natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 14. in 15. decembra 2006, v katerih je ta izrazil popolno podporo prizadevanjem Marttija Ahtisaarija za rešitev vprašanja o statusu Kosova in potrdil pripravljenost Unije, da igra pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju prihodnjega dogovora o statusu,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 14/15 December 2006, which fully support Martti Ahtisaari's efforts towards a solution of the status question and reaffirm the Union's readiness to play a significant role in the implementation of the future status settlement,
ob upoštevanju končnega poročila posebnega odposlanca za prihodnji status Kosova in celovitega predloga dogovora o statusa Kosova z dne 26. marca 2007,
having regard to the Special Envoy's final report on Kosovo's future status and the Comprehensive Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement of 26 March 2007,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0067/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A6-0067/2007 ),
ker vodilna načela za dogovor o statusu Kosova, ki jih je kontaktna skupina sprejela dne 7. oktobra 2005, poudarjajo, da bi morala biti mednarodna prednostna naloga doseči dogovor s pogajanji ter da pogajalskega procesa, ko se je ta že začel, ni mogoče ustaviti in ga je treba pripeljati do konca; ker ta načela jasno določajo, da ne more biti mogoča ponovna vzpostavitev razmer iz časa pred marcem 1999 oziroma da ne more priti do kakršne koli delitve Kosova ali njegove združitve s katero koli drugo državo ali delom države,
whereas the guiding principles for a settlement of the status of Kosovo adopted by the Contact Group on 7 October 2005 emphasise that a negotiated settlement should be an international priority and that, once started, the negotiation process cannot be blocked and must be brought to a conclusion; whereas those principles stipulate clearly that there cannot be any return to the pre–March 1999 situation, or any partition of Kosovo, or any union of Kosovo with any other country or part of any country,
ker je bilo prebivalstvo Kosova v devetdesetih letih žrtev sistematičnega nasilja in represije, ki se je leta 1999 stopnjevalo v množični izgon civilnega prebivalstva, zaradi česar se je Varnostni svet ZN neposredno po akciji Nata odločil za posredovanje in je na ozemlju uvedel mednaroden civilen in varnosten nadzor; ker je s tem nastal položaj, ki se v mednarodnem pravu doslej še ni pojavil,
whereas in the 1990s the population of Kosovo was subject to systematic acts of violence and repression which in 1999 escalated into in a mass expulsion of the civilian population, leading the UN Security Council, in the wake of NATO action, to intervene and to place the territory under international civil and security control; whereas this created an unprecedented situation in international law,
ker dogodki iz marca 2004, ki jih je treba obsoditi, dokazujejo, da na Kosovu še naprej ostaja napetost med albansko in srbsko skupnostjo ter da je treba najti rešitev, ki zagotavlja pravice za obe narodnosti in druge etnične skupine, v skladu z objavami Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE), Sveta Evrope in drugih organizacij, ki imajo pristojnosti na področju varstva manjšin,
whereas the events of March 2004, which must be condemned, prove the persisting tensions within Kosovo between the Albanian and the Serb communities and the need to find a solution which guarantees the rights of both ethnicities and of other ethnic groups, in line with the publications of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), the Council of Europe and other organisations with competencies in the field of the protection of minorities,
ker bo določitev prihodnjega statusa Kosova prispevala k njegovemu gospodarskemu razvoju, nastanku zrelega političnega razreda in razvoju strpne, nesegregacijske družbe v pokrajini,
whereas determining the future status of Kosovo will contribute to its economic development, the emergence of a mature political class and the development of a tolerant, non–segregational society in the province,
ker navkljub številnim krogom pogajanj na žalost ni bilo mogoče doseči nobenega dogovora, sprejemljivega za obe strani, ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je posebni odposlanec ZN kontaktni skupini in generalnemu sekretarju ZN predstavil predloge za dogovor,
whereas despite the numerous rounds of talks unfortunately no negotiated settlement acceptable to both sides could be reached, and taking note of the fact that the UN Special Envoy presented to the Contact Group and to the UN Secretary-General the proposals for the settlement,
ker na končni dogovor ne smejo vplivati grožnje z radikalizacijo na Kosovu ali v Srbiji, ampak mora biti ta dosežen z rešitvijo, pri kateri se upoštevajo interesi vseh vpletenih strani,
whereas the final settlement cannot be dictated by threats of radicalisation in Kosovo or Serbia but must be the result of a solution which takes into account the interests of all parties involved,
ker bi nadaljnja zamuda pri določanju statusa Kosova lahko negativno vpliva na že tako krhke in napete razmere,
whereas further delay in determining the status of Kosovo could have a negative impact on the already fragile and tense situation,
ker so dogodki iz leta 1999, dolgotrajna prehodna mednarodna uprava ter nastanek in postopna utrditev začasnih institucij kosovske samouprave povzročili izjemen položaj, zaradi katerih ponovna priključitev Kosova Srbiji ni realistična,
whereas the events of 1999, the long interim international administration and the emergence and gradual consolidation of Kosovo's Provisional Institutions of Self-government have created an exceptional situation that makes the reintegration of Kosovo into Serbia unrealistic,
ker je treba odnose med Kosovom in Srbijo, zaradi tesnih kulturnih, verskih in gospodarskih vezi, dodatno razvijati v duhu partnerstva in dobrih sosedskih odnosov v korist vsega prebivalstva Kosova in Srbije,
whereas relations between Kosovo and Serbia, given their close cultural, religious and economic ties, should be further developed in a spirit of partnership and good neighbourliness in the interests of the whole population of Kosovo and Serbia,
ker bo na Kosovu v bližnji prihodnosti še vedno potrebna navzočnost mednarodne skupnosti zaradi pomanjkanja zaupanja med različnimi etničnimi skupinami, še vedno negotovega položaja ter potrebe po nadaljnjem razvoju in utrditvi večetničnih ustanov,
whereas the lack of trust between the different ethnic groups, the still volatile situation and the need to further develop and consolidate democratic, multi-ethnic institutions in Kosovo call for a continuous international presence for the foreseeable future,
ker bi morala mednarodna skupnost nadaljevati z vlaganjem v vzgojo, zlasti glede na težke izzive, s katerimi se bo morala spopasti mlajša generacija na Kosovu,
whereas the international community should continue to invest in education, especially in view of the serious challenges faced by Kosovo's younger generation,
ker mora Evropska unija zaradi strateškega položaja Kosova igrati osrednjo vlogo pri spremljanju, zagotavljanju in spodbujanju izvajanja dogovora o statusu Kosova ter prav tako pomagati pri oblikovanju in utrditvi njegovih demokratičnih institucij, Parlament pa mora opravljati nalogo nadzora,
whereas, given Kosovo's strategic position, the European Union must play a central role in monitoring, guaranteeing and facilitating the implementation of the status settlement as well as assisting in the establishment and consolidation of democratic institutions in Kosovo, with Parliament exercising its monitoring responsibilities,
ker mora biti prispevek EU pogojen s tem, da so v dogovoru izpolnjene določene minimalne zahteve,
whereas the EU contribution must, however, be conditional on the fulfilment, in the settlement, of certain minimum requirements,
ker mora biti dogovor o končnem statusu Kosova skladen z EU, torej bi moral poskrbeti za ustavni okvir, ki je v skladu z evropsko perspektivo Kosova, in omogočiti Uniji uporabo vseh instrumentov, ki jih ima na voljo,
whereas the final status settlement must be EU-compatible, i.e. it should provide for a constitutional framework which is compatible with Kosovo's European prospects and should allow the Union to deploy the full range of instruments it has at its disposal,
podpira proces za določitev končnega statusa Kosova pod vodstvom ZN in prizadevanja za vzpostavitev okvira, ki bo sposoben preživeti in bo zagotavljal stabilnost in zaščito za vse skupnosti na Kosovu ter dolgoročen samozadosten gospodarski in družbeni razvoj; podpira celovit predlog dogovora o statusu Kosova, ki ga je pripravil Martti Ahtisaari, in meni, da je suverenost pod nadzorom mednarodne skupnosti najboljša možnost za uresničitev teh ciljev; na tej osnovi pričakuje, da bo Varnostni svet ZN hitro sprejel novo resolucijo, ki bo nadomestila resolucijo 1244 (1999);
Supports the UN-led process to determine the final status of Kosovo and the efforts to establish a viable framework that guarantees stability and protection for all the communities in Kosovo and long-term, self-sustaining economic and social development; endorses Mr Ahtisaari's Comprehensive Proposal for a Kosovo Status Settlement and takes the view that sovereignty supervised by the international community is the best option for securing those objectives; on this basis, expects the UN Security Council to adopt swiftly a new resolution replacing Resolution 1244 (1999);
meni, da je dogovor o Kosovu lahko trajen le, če:
Takes the view that the only sustainable settlement for Kosovo is one which:
zagotavlja Kosovu dostop do mednarodnih finančnih organizacij ter mu s tem omogoča začetek gospodarskega okrevanja in oblikovanje pogojev za ustvarjanje delovnih mest;
grants Kosovo access to international financial organisations and thus allows it to start its economic recovery and create the conditions for employment creation;
predvideva mednarodno prisotnost, da bi se ohranil večetnični značaj Kosova in zaščitili interesi in varnost srbskega in romskega prebivalstva ter drugih etničnih skupin;
envisages an international presence in order to maintain the multi-ethnic character of Kosovo and to safeguard the interests and security of the Serb and Roma populations and of other ethnic communities;
poskrbi za mednarodno podporo, da se zagotovi razvoj učinkovitih in samostojnih institucij za celotno prebivalstvo Kosova, ki bodo delovale v skladu s pravno državo in osnovnimi načeli demokracije;
provides international support in order to secure the development of effective, self-sustaining institutions for the entire population of Kosovo, operating in accordance with the rule of law and the basic ground-rules of democracy;
omogoča Kosovu uresničitev njegove želje po vključitvi v Evropo, kar bo sčasoma pripeljalo do odnosov medsebojne soodvisnosti z njegovimi sosedi;
allows Kosovo to achieve its desire to be integrated in Europe, which in time will lead to relations of mutual interdependence with its neighbours;
meni, da mora biti vsak dogovor o prihodnjem statusu Kosova v skladu z mednarodnim pravom;
Considers that any settlement regarding the future status of Kosovo must be in accordance with international law;
izraža upanje, da bo v Srbiji kmalu mogoče oblikovati močno in Evropi jasno naklonjeno vlado, ki se bo resno in pozitivno vključila v iskanje rešitve za vprašanje statusa Kosova; poudarja, da je takšna vlada potrebna tudi za popolno sodelovanje z Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo (ICTY) ter bo pod temi pogoji omogočila ponoven začetek pogajanj o stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenem sporazumu med Srbijo in Evropsko unijo ter njegovo dokončno sklenitev;
Expresses the hope that a strong and clearly pro-European government can be formed soon in Serbia, which will be seriously and positively engaged in seeking a solution to the question of the status of Kosovo; emphasises that such a government is also necessary for the purposes of full cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and will allow, under these conditions, for the re-opening of the negotiations on, and the final conclusion of, a Stabilisation and Association Agreement between Serbia and the European Union;
meni, da bi moral končni dogovor med drugim zajemati naslednje vidike:
Believes that the final settlement should cover inter alia the following aspects:
jasno opredelitev vloge in pristojnosti mednarodne civilne in varnostne navzočnosti;
a clear definition of the role and mandate of the international civilian and security presence;
jasne določbe o decentralizaciji, ki zagotavljajo precejšnjo avtonomijo na ključnih področjih, kot so izobraževanje, zdravstvo in lokalni varnostni organi, ter v primeru srbskih občin omogočajo neposredne vendar pregledne stike z oblastmi v Beogradu; takšne določbe morajo biti finančno vzdržljive in ne smejo spodkopati proračunskih, izvršilnih in zakonodajnih pristojnosti enotnega Kosova;
clear provisions on decentralisation which grant substantial autonomy in key areas such as education, health and local security and, in the case of Serb municipalities, allow direct but transparent links with Belgrade; such provisions must be financially sustainable and must not undermine the budgetary, executive and legislative prerogatives of a unitary Kosovo;
popolno spoštovanje človekovih pravic, vključno z dolžnostjo zagotavljanja ustavnega jamstva za glavne interese manjšin in beguncev ter ustreznih mehanizmov za zaščito teh interesov;
full respect for human rights including the obligation to provide constitutional guarantees for the vital interests of minorities and refugees, and adequate mechanisms for safeguarding such interests;
zaščito vseh kulturnih in verskih krajev;
the protection of all cultural and religious sites;
določbe o oblikovanju lahko oboroženih večetničnih notranjih kosovskih varnostnih sil z omejenim obsegom, zmogljivostmi in nalogami ter pod strogim nadzorom mednarodnih sil pod vodstvom Nata na Kosovu (KFOR);
provisions regarding the establishment of a lightly-equipped, multi-ethnic internal Kosovar Security Force with limited scope, capability and functions, under the strict supervision of the NATO-led Kosovo Force (KFOR);
mednarodna jamstva vseh sosednjih držav za ozemeljsko celovitost;
international guarantees for the territorial integrity of all neighbouring states;
poudarja, da rešitev na Kosovu ne bo postavila precedensa v mednarodnem pravu, saj je Kosovo pod upravo ZN od leta 1999 in resolucija Varnostnega sveta ZN 1244 (1999) že vsebuje določbe o potrebi po rešitvi vprašanja končnega statusa Kosova; zato sklepa, da okoliščine, povezane s Kosovom, niso nikakor primerljive z razmerami v drugih konfliktnih regijah, ki niso pod upravo ZN;
Underlines that the solution in Kosovo will set no precedent in international law, as Kosovo has been under UN rule since 1999 and UN Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999) already contained provisions on the need to resolve the question of Kosovo's final status; concludes, therefore, that the situation regarding Kosovo is in no way comparable with the situation in other conflict regions which are not under UN administration;
poudarja, da mora dogovor o prihodnosti Kosova vključevati tudi posebno institucionalno ureditev za Kosovsko Mitrovico, ki v polni meri jamči za pravice in varnost srbske skupnosti, ne da spodkopava enotnost Kosova; meni, da bi morala biti takšna ureditev pod neposrednim nadzorom mednarodne skupnosti in bi se bilo treba o njej posvetovati z Beogradom; vendar opozarja Srbijo, da je njena vloga na Kosovu povezana z njenim sodelovanjem pri izvajanju končnega dogovora o statusu;
Emphasises that an agreement on the future of Kosovo must also include specific institutional arrangements for Kosovska Mitrovica which fully guarantee the rights and security of the Serb community without undermining the unity of Kosovo; believes that those arrangements should be directly supervised by the international community, in consultation with Belgrade; reminds Serbia, however, that such involvement in Kosovo is linked with Serbia's cooperation in implementing the final status settlement;
zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da Ahtisaarijev predlog načrtuje široko avtonomijo za srbsko in druge skupnosti, vključno z občutno stopnjo občinske avtonomije, v skladu z evropskimi načeli subsidiarnosti in samouprave;
Welcomes, therefore, the fact that the Ahtisaari proposal outlines wide-ranging autonomy for the Serbian and other communities, including a substantial degree of municipal autonomy in line with the European principles of subsidiarity and self-governance;
meni, da bi morala mednarodna skupnost svojo prisotnost na Kosovu naravnati, kolikor je mogoče, podpori lokalnim oblastem pri:
Is of the opinion that the international community should, as far as possible, gear its presence towards assisting local authorities in:
izvajanju določil iz dogovora;
implementing the terms of the settlement;
razvijanju avtonomnih institucionalnih, upravnih, sodnih in policijskih zmogljivosti, pri katerih so etnične skupnosti uravnoteženo zastopane;
developing autonomous, ethnically balanced institutional, administrative, judicial and policing capacity;
doseganju napredka pri izpolnjevanju standardov ZN ter stabilizacijskih in pridružitvenih meril EU;
achieving progress in complying with UN standards and EU stabilisation and association benchmarks;
zato meni, da mednarodna misija na Kosovu, ki bi sicer morala biti dovolj številčna za ustrezno izpolnjevanje svojih nalog, ne bi smela privesti do oblikovanje vzporedne uprave ali podvajati obstoječo upravo pod vodstvom Združenih narodov;
Believes, therefore, that, whilst it should be staffed in a manner commensurate with its tasks, the international presence in Kosovo should not result in the establishment of a parallel administration or replicate the existing UN-led administration;
poudarja, da mora imeti mednarodna skupnost neposredne pristojnosti za izboljšave in v omejenih primerih tudi za zamenjave na ključnih področjih, kot so:
Emphasises that the international community must have direct corrective and, in limited cases, substitution powers in crucial areas such as:
zaščita bistvenih interesov manjšin;
safeguarding the vital interests of minorities;
zaščita občutljivih krajev;
the protection of sensitive sites;
sodstvo in širše pravna država, še zlasti v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu;
the judiciary and the broader rule of law, particularly in the fight against organised crime;
poudarja, da so potrebna dodatna prizadevanja za podporo nadaljnjemu vračanju beguncev in razseljenih oseb povsod na Kosovu; poudarja, da so možnosti za delo osrednjega pomena za trajnostno vračanje in da mora trajnostni gospodarski razvoj sedaj postati prednostna naloga; poudarja, da je treba nesrbskim in nealbanskim beguncem, kot so Romi in Aškali, posvetiti posebno pozornost, vključno z notranje razseljenimi osebami romske narodnosti, ki živijo v taboriščih v Kosovski Mitrovici;
Stresses that additional efforts are needed to support the further return of refugees and displaced persons throughout Kosovo; underlines that the key to sustainable return is work opportunities and that sustainable economic development must now become a priority; underlines that non-Serb and non-Albanian refugees, such as Roma and Ashkali, need special attention, including the Roma internally displaced persons living in the camps in Kosovska Mitrovica;
podpira potrebo po vključujočem in pravičnem vzgojno–izobraževalnem sistemu, ki bo romskim in aškalskim učencem zagotavljal del izobraževanja v romskem jeziku in tako gojil identiteto in kulturo teh manjšinskih skupnosti;
Supports the need for an inclusive and fair educational system which will provide for Roma and Ashkali pupils to be partially educated in the Roma language, thereby nurturing the identity and culture of those minority communities;
poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo mora odigrati Varnostni svet ZN pri sprejetju končne odločitve o prihodnjem statusu Kosova; poziva Evropsko unijo in njene države članice, zlasti tiste, ki so tudi članice Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov, naj popolnoma in dejavno podprejo takšno rešitev za prihodnji status Kosova, ki bo sposobna preživeti;
Underlines the important role that the United Nations Security Council has to play for a final decision on the future status of Kosovo; urges the European Union and its Member States, and in particular those Member States which are also members of the UN Security Council, to give their full and active support to a viable solution for the future status of Kosovo;
meni, da je sprejetje nove resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov tudi bistveno za prihodnje obveznosti EU na Kosovu in da brez takšne resolucije ne bi smeli načrtovati nikakršne okrepljene prisotnosti EU;
Considers that the adoption of a new UN Security Council resolution is also crucial for the future engagement of the EU in Kosovo, and that no enhanced EU involvement should be envisaged in the absence of such a resolution;
je prepričan, da bi morala imeti Evropska unija, zaradi svoje osrednje vloge pri izvajanju dogovora, odločilno besedo pri določitvi dokončnih pogojev iz tega dogovora;
Is convinced that, in the light of its central role in the implementation of the settlement, the European Union should have a decisive say on the final terms of the settlement;
je prepričan, da bi morale države članice poskušati doseči enotno stališče glede vprašanja Kosova, zato poziva Svet, naj si prizadeva sprejeti skupno stališče o vprašanju statusa, v katerem določi minimalne zahteve glede trajnostne rešitve za Kosovo, ki bi bila v skladu z EU;
Believes that Member States should try to reach a single position on the question of Kosovo and therefore calls on the Council to endeavour to adopt a common position on the status issue spelling out the minimum requirements of a sustainable, EU-compatible solution for Kosovo;
opozarja, da bi v skladu s členom 19 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji od držav članic, ki so zastopane v Varnostnem svetu Združenih narodov, pričakovali, da bodo zagovarjale skupno stališče in da bodo Svet EU redno obveščale o poteku pogajanj; poziva tudi k rednemu obveščanju Parlamenta;
Recalls that, in accordance with Article 19 of the Treaty on European Union, Member States represented in the UN Security Council would be expected to uphold that common position and to keep the EU Council regularly informed about negotiations; also calls for Parliament to be kept regularly informed;
poziva države članice EU, ki so članice kontaktne skupine, naj izmenjajo svoje informacije s Svetom in vsemi drugimi državami članicami ter izboljšajo usklajevanje in sodelovanje z njimi, saj bo EU kot celota nosila mednarodno odgovornost in finančno breme končnega dogovora;
Calls on those EU Member States that are members of the Contact Group to share their information with the Council and all other Member States, and to improve coordination and cooperation with them, because the EU as a whole will bear the international responsibility and the financial burden of the final settlement;
poziva države članice v Varnostnem svetu Združenih narodov, še zlasti njegove stalne članice, naj igrajo konstruktivno vlogo, naj si prizadevajo zagotoviti, da bosta obe vpleteni strani delovali prožno, ter naj v skladu s predlogi posebnega odposlanca sprejmejo nedvoumno in trajno rešitev za Kosovo, s čim večjim soglasjem obeh strani;
Urges Member States in the UN Security Council and, in particular, the Permanent Members to play a constructive role, to strive to ensure that the two parties involved act in a flexible manner and to adopt an unambiguous, sustainable solution for Kosovo, along the lines of the proposals submitted by the Special Envoy, with the agreement of the two parties as far as possible;