natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
spodbuja Komisijo, da dober zgled državne pomoči za železniški vozni park, kot je bila omogočena pri namestitvi oziroma nadgradnji opreme ERTMS v vlakih, prenese tudi na zmanjševanje hrupa pri tovornih vagonih, saj bi to omogočilo prihranke pri naložbah v infrastrukturo;
Urges the Commission to extend the good example set within the field of state aid for rolling stock, made possible in connection with the installation/improvement of ERTMS in trains and to noise reduction in goods trucks, as this will enable savings to be made in infrastructure investments;
priznava, da je možnost prednostne obravnave železniškega potniškega prometa na račun železniškega tovornega prometa prek izjemno visokih cen prog dejavnik, ki negativno vpliva na konkurenčnost železniškega tovornega prometa; ugotavlja, da je za to obnašanje prevoznikov v železniškem prometu neposredno odgovorna nezadostna finančna pomoč, ki jo države članice namenjajo prevoznikom; zato poziva Komisijo, da sprejme vse pravne ukrepe in prepreči tako ravnanje;
Recognises that the option of giving preference to passenger rail transport at the expense of rail freight transport through very high route pricing is a factor which negatively affects the competitiveness of rail freight transport; notes that such action by rail undertakings is a direct result of the under-funding of these undertakings by the Member States; calls, therefore, on the Commission to take all legal steps to prevent this practice;
poziva Komisijo, da ukrepa proti takšni praksi subvencioniranja, ko pomoč EU za promet prejemajo države članice, ki to pomoč uporabljajo izključno za financiranje cestnega omrežja, železniško omrežje pa zanemarjajo; meni, da bi bilo treba pri sofinanciranju vsaj 40% sredstev nameniti železnicam;
Calls on the Commission to take action against the practice whereby EU transport aid flows into Member States which use it almost exclusively to subsidise their road networks while neglecting the railways; considers that, in the event of co-financing, at least 40% of the appropriations should be allocated to the railways;
ugotavlja, da se v treh baltskih članicah izvaja zakonodaja EU in da tam trenutno poteka liberalizacija trga, v sosednji državi, Rusiji, pa to ni tako.
Notes that the three Baltic Member States have implemented EU legislation and are liberalising their markets while this is not the case in their neighbouring country, Russia.
podpira Komisijo v njenih prizadevanjih za nadaljnje spodbujanje vseevropskega železniškega tovornega omrežja in pričakuje, da bo podpora namenjena predvsem prednostnim projektom vseevropskega cestnega omrežja;
Supports the Commission in its efforts to promote the trans-European rail freight network still further and expects support to be given in particular to the priority Trans-European Network projects;
zahteva, da Komisija predloži priporočilo o trajnostni reviziji finančne strukture železnic (glej člen 9 Direktive Sveta 91/440/EGS);
Requests the Commission to put forward recommendations for the sustainable reform of the railways" financial structure (see Article 9 of Council Directive 91/440/EEC);
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi načrt o pospeševanju obnove železniških povezav z industrijskimi podjetji ter poskrbi, da se preneha z uničevanjem povezav;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a plan for promoting the restoration of rail connections to industrial undertakings and to ensure that links are no longer destroyed;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost uvedbe večje preglednosti in predvidljivosti cene prog, z uvedbo načela minimalne usklajenosti cen na mednarodnih koridorjih, v katere vlagajo železniška podjetja, da bi izboljšala interoperabilnost;
Calls on the Commission to look into the possibility of making route prices more transparent and predictable , establishing the principle of a minimum of harmonisation of prices on international corridors in which railway undertakings are investing in order to improve interoperability;
meni, da je ločitev železniške infrastrukture od obratovanja zaradi osrednje vloge upravljavcev infrastrukture v železniškem sektorju ključno vprašanje železniške politike, in s tem v zvezi meni, da je nujno treba vzpostaviti neodvisen in pregleden regulatorni organ nadzora z ustreznim financiranjem;
Considers the separation of railway infrastructure and operations to be a key issue of rail policy, given the central role of infrastructure operators within the rail industry, and in this connection regards it as absolutely essential to create an independent and transparent regulatory body with adequate funding;
meni, da tako model, ki temelji na ločitvi, kot tisti, ki temelji na integraciji, ustrezata pravu Skupnosti, če je zagotovljena neodvisnost glavnih funkcij v skladu z Direktivo 2001/14/ES; meni, da temu še ni tako, kar kažejo mnoge pritožbe podjetij, ki so vstopila na trg in tekmujejo s starimi uveljavljenimi državnimi železniškimi podjetji; poudarja, da so ali so bili v pritožbah navedeni naslednji razlogi:
Considers both the separation and the integration models to be compatible with Community law, provided that the independence of the essential functions is safeguarded in accordance with Directive 2001/14/EC; considers that this is not fully the case, as is shown by the numerous complaints made by undertakings entering the market which are in competition with incumbent state railway undertakings; highlights that their complaints include or have included the following:
dostopa do omrežja ali do ugodne proge ni bilo mogoče dodeliti, ker je bil že dodeljen železniškemu podjetju, ki je pripadalo prevladujoči skupini,
access to the network or to a favourable route could not be granted because this route had already been allocated to a rail undertaking belonging to the dominant group;
njihovim željam ni bilo mogoče ugoditi, ker so bili pred tem odstranjeni kretniški jezički in/ali demontirani izogibalni tiri,
their wishes could not be met since points had previously been extended and/or passing loops dismantled;
na določenih odsekih je bila brez razloga odrejena počasnejša vožnja (omejitve hitrosti), da bi s tem zmanjšali zanesljivost konkurentovih povezav z drugimi vlaki,
low-speed stretches of route (speed limits) had been ordered – for no good reason – in order to undermine competitors" security of connections;
ni bilo mogoče kupiti rabljenih lokomotiv, ker so bile že razrezane oziroma so nacionalna železniška podjetja morebitnim kupcem preprečila nakup,
it was not possible to purchase second-hand locomotives because they had already been scrapped, or because potential buyers were prevented from doing so by national rail undertakings;
cene prog so se izjemno zvišale, potem ko je bilo kupljeno nekdanje državno železniško podjetje,
route prices were drastically increased after a former state railway undertaking was purchased;
cene so se dvignile v tako kratkem roku, da novih cen ni bilo mogoče upoštevati pri določanju cen, železniška podjetja iz prevladujoče skupine pa so bila o tem obveščena vnaprej,
route prices were raised at such short notice that it was not possible to take them into account in pricing, while the railway undertaking belonging to the dominant group was notified in advance;
navzkrižno financiranje znotraj prevladujočih skupin se ni preprečilo, saj je del plačanih uporabnin stekel v holdinško podjetje, namesto da bi ga uporabili v korist infrastrukture, kar ni le izboljšalo njihovih rezultatov, ampak jim je tudi omogočilo, da so svoje storitve zagotavljali na trgu po nižji ceni,
cross-subsidisation within dominant groups was not prevented, because parts of the route prices they paid flowed into the holding company instead of being used to benefit the infrastructure, which not only improved their results but also enabled them to provide their service more cheaply on the market;
nedržavna podjetja pogosto plačujejo višjo ceno energije kot podružnice skupin, čeprav je oskrba z energijo vključena v holdinško družbo, regionalno sodišče v Frankfurtu na Maini pa je celo presodilo, da je tako izkrivljanje konkurence sprejemljivo,
non-state undertakings often pay higher energy prices than group subsidiaries, even if energy supply is integrated into the holding company, and this distortion of competition has even been ruled permissible by the Frankfurt Regional Court ;
licenciranje, zlasti lokomotiv, je v posameznih državah različno urejeno in da vsaka država članica za svoje omrežje zahteva svojo lastno licenco, kar ni samo dolgotrajno, temveč je povezano tudi z zelo visokimi stroški;
licensing, particularly of locomotives, is regulated differently from one country to another and each Member State requires a separate licence for its own network, which is not only very time-consuming but also prohibitively expensive;
ugotavlja, da je vstop novih ponudnikov enovagonskega tovornega prometa na trg odvisen od učinkovitega dela ranžirnih postaj; meni, da je nevtralno upravljanje ranžirnih postaj nujno za zagotavljanje enakopravne obravnave vseh podjetij, in poziva Komisijo, naj preuči ustrezno dopolnitev prava EU;
Notes that the entry into the market of new service providers in the single wagonload traffic sector is dependent on the efficient operation of marshalling yards; regards it as necessary for marshalling yards to be neutrally operated in order to ensure that all undertakings are treated in a non-discriminatory manner, and calls on the Commission to consider amending EU law to this effect;
poziva Komisijo, da železniške sisteme, ki so omejeni na nacionalne meje, spremeni tako, da bo vsakemu železniškemu podjetju, ki izpolnjuje potrebne pravne in tehnične pogoje v svoji državi članici, dovoljeno obratovanje po vsem evropskem omrežju (vzajemna odobritev), kar ne bo spodbudilo le vseevropski, temveč tudi regionalni čezmejni promet; poudarja, da bo to odpravilo tudi prednosti cestnega in zračnega prometa, kjer so takšne razmere prisotne že mnogo let;
Calls on the Commission to adapt the rail systems currently confined within national borders in such a way that each rail undertaking which meets the necessary legal and technical requirements in a Member State be permitted to operate across the whole European network (cross-acceptance), thus promoting not only trans-European but also regional cross-border traffic; emphasises that this will also eliminate the advantages of road and air transport where these have existed for many years;
poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma začne sodni postopek proti državam članicam, ki do določenega datuma niso uresničile prvega in drugega železniškega paketa;
Calls on the Commission to initiate legal proceedings without delay against those Member States which have not implemented the first and/or second railway package by the specified date;
ugotavlja, da je treba absolutno prednost nameniti polnemu izvajanju prvega železniškega paketa, vključno s testnimi merili, ki jih je Komisija navedla v prilogah k svojem poročilu o izvajanju prvega železniškega paketa;
Notes that absolute priority must be given to the full implementation of the First Railway Package, including the test criteria laid down by the Commission in the Annexes to its report on the implementation of the First Railway Package;
poudarja, da se je od leta 2001 delež trga prevoza blaga po železnici v EU-25 stabiliziral in razen baltskih držav, ki so deležne ugodnosti zaradi geografske lege in narave proizvodov, ki se prevažajo, so najbolj učinkovite tiste države, ki so prve začele z reformo svojega železniškega sektorja pred razglasitvijo direktiv Skupnosti in odprtjem trga;
Highlights that the railways" share of the freight market has been stabilising since 2001 in the EU-25 and the best performance, disregarding the Baltic States which benefit from their very special geographical location and the kind of goods transported, can be seen in Member States that were first to commence with a reform of their railway industry in anticipation of the promulgation of the Community Directives and the opening up of the market;
ugotavlja, da ima pomanjkanje zmogljivosti v evropskem železniškem omrežju negativen vpliv na obratovanje železnic glede na druge načine prevoza; poziva Komisijo, naj pred koncem leta 2007 preuči vpliv členov 22, 25 in 26 Direktive 2001/14/ES glede na analizo zmogljivosti in načrt povečanja zmogljivosti, ki sta v primeru preobremenjenosti infrastrukture predpisana v teh členih;
Notes that capacity shortages on the railways in Europe have a negative effect on the operation of the railways in relation to other modes of transport; calls on the Commission, before the end of 2007, to study the effects of Articles 22, 25 and 26 of Directive 2001/14/EC with reference to the capacity analysis and capacity enhancement plan prescribed therein in the event of infrastructure congestion;
poudarja, da lahko razvoj konkurenčnosti sektorja z odprtjem trga pospeši naložbe v prihodnosti in tako zagotovi rast in zaposlovanje, ki si ga je zadala za cilj Lizbonska strategija; poleg tega meni, da Skupnost s prispevanjem k razvoju okolju prijaznega prevoza načrtno podpira razvoj trajnostnega prevoza;
Emphasises that improving the competitiveness of the sector through market opening will encourage future investment, thus ensuring growth and employment, two objectives that the Lisbon Strategy aims to attain; notes that, in addition, by contributing to the development of environmentally friendly transport, the Community thus opts for the development of sustainable transport;
poudarja pomen neodvisne vloge železniških podjetij, kot ga med drugim navaja člen 5 Direktive 91/440/EGS glede tehničnega, organizacijskega in finančnega upravljanja, ter ugotavlja pozitivni vpliv take vloge na razvoj železnice kot načina prevoza;
Stresses the importance of an independent role for railway undertakings, as enshrined, inter alia, in Article 5 of Directive 91/440/EEC with regard to technical, organisational and financial management, and notes the positive effects of such a role on the development of rail as a mode of transport;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. julija 2007 o sporočilu "Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju - Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino" ( 2006/2227(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 12 July 2007 on keeping Europe moving − Sustainable mobility for our continent ( 2006/2227(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu "Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju - Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino - Vmesni pregled Bele knjige Evropske komisije o prometu iz leta 2001" ( KOM(2006)0314 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament "Keep Europe moving - Sustainable mobility for our continent - Mid-term review of the European Commission's 2001 Transport White Paper" ( COM(2006)0314 ),
ob upoštevanju povzetka finskega predsedstva o vmesnem pregledu bele knjige Evropske komisije o prometu iz leta 2001, ki odraža razpravo v Svetu za promet z dne 12. oktobra 2006 (dok.
having regard to the synthesis of the Finnish presidency on the Mid-term review of the European Commission's 2001 Transport White Paper, which reflects the discussion at the Transport Council of 12 October 2006 (Council doc.
Sveta 13847/06 TRANS 257),
13847/06 - TRANS 257),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0190/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0190/2007 ),
ker je bilo zgoraj omenjeno sporočilo Komisije objavljeno po obširnih posvetovanjih z vpletenimi zainteresiranimi stranmi; ker besedilo temelji na posodobljenem pristopu in sledi lizbonskim ciljem ter se uvršča v okvir evropskega trajnostnega razvoja,
whereas the above mentioned Communication from the Commission has been published following an extensive consultation with the involvement of stakeholders; whereas it is based on an up-to-date approach, is in line with the Lisbon targets and falls within the framework of European sustainable development,
ker Parlament priznava dosežke na nekaterih področjih evropske prometne politike in poudarja pomen stalnih prizadevanj, kot so:
whereas Parliament acknowledges the achievements in some European transport policy fields and emphasises the importance of continuous efforts, such as:
oblikovanje notranjega trga prometnih storitev z medsebojnim povezovanjem infrastrukturnih omrežij, uresničevanjem politike za spodbujanje interoperabilnosti, zagotavljanjem dostopnosti do tega trga, da se zagotovi potrebna čezmejna prepustnost, ter uporabljanjem posebnih ukrepov za blažitev učinkov neugodnih geografskih značilnosti najbolj oddaljenih regij in držav na zunanjih mejah Unije,
building the internal market in transport services through infrastructure network interconnection, pursuing policies to promote interoperability, ensuring accessibility to this market in order to secure the necessary cross-border permeability and applying specific measures to alleviate the geographical handicaps of the outermost regions and countries on the Union's external borders,
zagotavljanje večje povezanosti med državljani prek prometne politike in drugih orodij,
ensuring greater cohesion between citizens through transport policy and other tools,
uporaba ukrepov za zmanjšanje negativnih posledic prometnega sektorja na okolje,
applying measures to reduce the negative environmental effects of the transport sector,
stalno pregledovanje in nadaljnji razvoj varnosti vseh vrst prometa (letalskega in pomorskega prometa ter prometa po celinskih plovnih poteh, železnici in cestah), pri čemer se upošteva njegov družbeno-gospodarski razvoj,
continually reviewing and further developing safety, taking into account its socio-economic importance, in all modes of transport (aviation, maritime, inland navigation, railway and road),
prizadevanja za povečanje kakovosti storitev in za varstvo potrošnikov v vseh vrstah prometa, da se izpolnjuje cilj oblikovanja notranjega trga,
efforts to increase quality of service and to protect consumers in all transport modes in order to comply with the objective of creating an internal market,
prizadevanja za zagotavljanje osnovnih pravic potnikov, nenazadnje s tem, da se v sodelovanju z državami članicami zagotavlja univerzalna storitev,
efforts to ensure basic passengers' rights, not least by guaranteeing a universal service in cooperation with Member States,
učinkovito izvajanje predpisov o delovnih pogojih,
effectively implementing rules on working conditions,
ker Parlament poudarja, da se mora evropska prometna politika spoprijeti z naslednjimi novimi izzivi:
whereas Parliament emphasises that the following new challenges must be met by European transport policy:
povpraševanje po prometu se povečuje hitreje, kot je bilo predvideno, in raste hitreje od BDP,
transport demand is growing faster than anticipated, and has grown more strongly than GDP,
konkurenčnost evropskega gospodarstva bolj kakor kdajkoli prej potrebuje učinkovit in dobro delujoč trajnostni prometni sistem, v okviru katerega bi se moral promet obravnavati kot sestavni del evropske rasti in konkurenčnosti,
the competitiveness of the European economy needs more than ever an efficient, well-functioning sustainable transport system, where transport should be seen as part of European growth and competitiveness,
povečanje škodljivih učinkov toplogrednih plinov na podnebne spremembe, sploh če se upošteva prispevek sektorja k podnebnim spremembam,
the adverse effects of greenhouse gases in terms of climate change have increased, not least because of the sector's contribution to climate change,
nadaljnja rast cen energije, zlasti cen fosilnih goriv, ki se uporabljajo v prometu,
energy prices, especially the prices of the fossil fuels used in transport, are continuing to rise,
možnosti za inovacije in nove tehnologije so se znatno povečale,
the potential of innovation and new technologies has increased significantly,
nove naloge, ki so se pojavile zaradi globalizacije,
new tasks have also arisen from globalisation,
varnost in zaščita prometne infrastrukture pred terorizmom postajata vedno bolj pomembni,
the security and protection of transport infrastructures from terrorism is becoming increasingly important,
povečale so se težave v sektorju prometa, ki so povezane s kriminalom v prometu ter organiziranimi krajami gospodarskih vozil in njihovega tovora,
problems, in the transport sector, pertaining to transport criminality and the organised theft of commercial vehicles and their loads have increased,
večja mesta vedno težje ohranjajo nemoteno pretočnost potniškega in tovornega prometa,
large cities are finding it increasingly difficult to maintain a smooth flow of passenger and goods traffic,
ker prometna industrija predstavlja približno 7 % evropskega BDP in se dohodki od prometa nenehno povečujejo; poudarja, da učinkovit promet ne prispeva le h gospodarski rasti, temveč je bistven tudi za naložbe v razpoložljive tehnologije, ki so komercialno mogoče in gospodarsko trajnostne; poudarja, da so se zastoji v prometu povečali in Evropsko unijo stanejo približno 1 % BDP in da prometna industrija predstavlja približno 5 % delovnih mest, kar pomeni, da je več kot 10 milijonov ljudi zaposlenih v sektorjih, povezanih s prometom; v zvezi s tem meni, da vmesni pregled daje priložnost Parlamentu, da bolj izrecno, nedvoumno in usmerjeno izrazi cilje evropske prometne politike, z namenom uresničevanja ciljev trajnostne mobilnosti,
whereas the transport industry accounts for about 7% of European GDP and the revenue from transport has grown continuously; stresses that efficient transport contributes not only to economic growth, but is also vital for investment in available technologies that are commercially possible and economically sustainable; points out that transport congestion has increased and costs the European Union about 1% of GDP, and the transport industry accounts for about 5% of employment, which means over 10 million people are employed in transport related sectors; believes that, in this context, the mid-term review gives Parliament an opportunity to express the aims of European transport policy more explicitly and unambiguously, with a focus on goals and a view to sustainable mobility,
poudarja pomen okrepljenega sodelovanja na evropski, državni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki bi moralo vključevati učinkovito izvajanje skupnih pravil in bolj učinkovite načine izvrševanja, prav tako poudarja potrebo po pragmatičnem in sodelovalnem medsebojnem povezovanju prometa in drugih področjih, kot so energetika, okolje in inovacije; predlaga, da bi se prometna politika v celoti vključila v Lizbonsko strategijo in bi se upoštevala pri oceni in priporočilih, ki jih vsako leto države članice predstavijo v svojih nacionalnih načrtih, da se meri in primerja napredek;
Stresses the importance of strengthened cooperation at European, national, regional and local levels, which should include the effective implementation of common rules and more efficient ways of enforcement; also stresses the need for pragmatic and cooperative interconnection of transport and other policy areas such as energy, environment and innovation; proposes that transport policy should be fully integrated into the Lisbon Strategy and taken into account in the assessment and recommendations put forward each year by the Member States in their national plans in order to measure and compare progress;