natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
izjeme, ki jih vsebuje navedena uredba (kot je varstvo postopka odločanja), je treba razlagati strogo in jih presojati z vidika prevladujočega javnega interesa za razkritje, ki je povezan z demokracijo, tesnejšim sodelovanjem državljanov v procesu odločanja, legitimnostjo uprave ter učinkovitostjo in odgovornostjo do državljanov Dokument, za katerega bi lahko veljala izjema (na primer "pravno mnenje"), je treba vsebinsko preučiti, da se določi, kateri njegovi deli so zajeti v izjemi; tveganje, povezano z razkritjem, "mora biti razumno predvidljivo in ne le hipotetično"; uravnotežiti je treba takšno tveganje in "javni interes, da se omogoči dostop do dokumenta ob upoštevanju prednosti, ki izhajajo [...] iz povečane preglednosti, to je tesnejšega sodelovanja državljanov v postopku odločanja in večje zakonitosti v upravi ter njeno učinkovitejše in odgovornejše ravnanje v razmerju do državljanov v demokratičnem sistemu".
the exceptions contained in that Regulation (such as the protection of the decision-making process) must be strictly interpreted and balanced against the overriding public interest in disclosure, as it is linked to democracy, participation of citizens more closely in the decision-making process, legitimacy of the administration, effectiveness and accountability to citizens A document that could be covered by an exception (such as a "legal opinion") should be examined as to its content to evaluate which parts of it are covered by the exception; the risks linked to disclosure must be "reasonably foreseeable and not purely hypothetical"; a balancing between such a risk and "the public interest in the document being made accessible in the light of the advantages stemming [...] from increased openness, in that enabled citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and accountable to the citizen in a democratic system".
ti zaključki so še pomembnejši, ko institucije EU delujejo v svoji zakonodajni funkciji Ker je "možnost državljanov, da poznajo temelje zakonodajne dejavnosti [...] namreč pogoj, da lahko učinkovito izvajajo svoje demokratične pravice" (odstavek 46 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco) in je prevladujoč interes javnosti, ki se poudarja v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001, v tem, "da lahko razkritje dokumentov [...] o pravnih vprašanjih, ki se pojavijo med razpravo o zakonodajnih pobudah, poveča preglednost in odprtost zakonodajnega postopka ter krepi demokratično pravico evropskih državljanov" (odstavek 67 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco).
these conclusions are even more important when EU institutions act in their legislative capacity As "the possibility for citizens to find out the considerations underpinning legislative action is a precondition for the effective exercise of their democratic rights" (Paragraph 46 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case) and an overriding public interest underlined in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 is that of "disclosure of documents [...] on legal questions arising when legislative initiatives are being debated increases the transparency and openness of the legislative process and strengthens the democratic right of European citizens" (Paragraph 67 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case).
preglednost glede različnih stališč o nekem aktu (in njegovi zakonitosti), "omogoča javno razpravo o razhajanjih med različnimi mnenji ter daje institucijam večjo legitimnost v očeh evropskih državljanov in povečuje njihovo zaupanje" Odstavek 59 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco.
openness with regard to different views concerning an act (and its legality) "contributes to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of European citizens and increasing their confidence in them by allowing divergences between various points of view to be openly debated" Paragraph 59 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case.
institucija mora predložiti podrobno navedbo razlogov za zavrnitev Odstavek 69 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco.
detailed statement of reasons for a refusal must be given by the institution Paragraph 69 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case.
izjema lahko velja le za obdobje, ko je varstvo dokumenta utemeljeno na podlagi vsebine dokumenta Odstavek 70 sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco.
an exception can only apply for the period during which protection is justified on the basis of the content of the document Paragraph 70 of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case.
poudarja, da omenjena sodba Sodišča v zadevi Turco v EU dodatno krepi načelo, po katerem morajo biti dejavnosti, dokumenti in odločitve demokratičnih institucij javne, kar je pogoj za njihovo zakonitost, legitimnost in odgovornost na podlagi člena 6 Pogodbe EU ter členov 254 in 255 Pogodbe ES, zaradi česar morajo biti dokumenti objavljeni in v vsakem primeru dostopni, vsako odstopanje od tega načela pa je treba strogo omejiti in strogo razložiti;
Emphasises that the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case further strengthens in the EU the principle by which democratic institutions have a duty to ensure publicity of their activities, documents and decisions, which is a condition of their legality, legitimacy and accountability, on the basis of Article 6 of the EU Treaty and of Articles 254 and 255 of the EC Treaty, and that consequently documents must be published and in any event accessible, and that any exception to this principle should be limited and interpreted strictly;
nujno poziva vse institucije EU, naj uporabljajo Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 v luči nedavne sodne prakse in zlasti sodbe Sodišča v zadevi Turco z vsemi njenimi posledicami, zlasti pri zakonodajnih postopkih (objava mnenj pravne službe, stroga razlaga izjem, obveznost podrobna navedba razlogov za zavrnitev itd.), in poziva Svet, naj pregleda tudi svoja pravila, da zagotovi javno dostopnost vseh razprav in informacij, vključno z identiteto delegacij držav članic v Svetu, pa tudi v njegovih delovnih skupinah in strokovnih skupinah, ter pripravi zapise svojih javnih sej, saj tudi v tem primeru velja sklep Sodišča, da interes javnosti do odprtosti prevlada nad izjemo v korist varstva postopka odločanja - različna stališča glede posameznega zakonodajnega akta namreč omogočajo večjo legitimnost institucij;
Urgently calls on all EU institutions to apply Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in the light of the recent case-law and notably of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case in all its implications, notably in the legislative procedures (publication of legal service opinions, strict interpretation of exceptions, obligation to provide a detailed statement of reasons for refusal, etc) and calls on the Council also to review its rules to ensure publicity of all discussions, documents and information, including the identity of the Member States" delegations in the Council, as well as in its working groups and expert groups, and to draw up a transcript of its public meetings, since the ECJ conclusions concerning the fact that the exception for the protection of the decision-making process is outweighed by the public interest in openness - as different views on a legislative act allow for a greater legitimacy for the institutions - apply also in this case;
poziva institucije EU, naj določijo skupna pravila o tem, kako izvajati upravne postopke in kako vlagati upravne dokumente, jih razvrščati kot zaupne, odpravljati njihovo zaupnost, jih registrirati in širiti v institucijah EU in zunaj njih, ob upoštevanju, da je načelo preglednosti neločljivo od načela dobrega upravljanja, kot so v členu 41 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah razglasili Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija; v istem oziru bi bilo treba v okviru revizije Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 le-to združiti z Uredbo Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 354/83 z dne 1. februarja 1983 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo UL L 43, 15.2.1983, str.
Calls on the EU institutions to define common rules on the way in which administrative procedures should be carried out and administrative documents should be tabled, classified, declassified, registered and disseminated inside and outside the EU institutions, bearing in mind that the transparency principle is indissociable from the principle of good administration as proclaimed by the European Parliament, Council and Commission in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union; in the same perspective, Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p.
, da bi vključevala opredelitve skupnih pravil glede sprotnih, vmesnih in zgodovinskih arhivov, s čemer bi se izognili sedanjim neskladjem v ravnanju institucij EU in držav članic;
should be merged as part of the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 to include definitions of common rules on live, intermediate and historical archives in order to avoid the current inconsistencies between the practices of the EU institutions and the Member States;
meni, da bi moral biti Parlament v ospredju, kar zadeva javnost, preglednost in odprtost v EU ter da bi moral pred parlamentarnimi volitvami leta 2009 začeti z izrednim akcijskim načrtom, na primer v okviru pobude o e-Parlamentu, s katerim bi zagotovil, da je zlasti na njegovi spletni strani na voljo več in lažje dostopnih informacij o:
Believes that Parliament should be at the forefront of publicity, transparency and openness in the EU, and that before the Parliamentary elections of 2009, it should launch an extraordinary action plan, for instance within the framework of the e-Parliament initiative, to ensure that more and easily accessible information is made available on its website, on:
dejavnostih, sodelovanju in prisotnosti poslancev Evropskega parlamenta pri parlamentarnem delu, in sicer v absolutnih, relativnih in odstotnih vrednostih, ki so na voljo in dostopne državljanom tudi prek iskalnih meril Kot so: koliko dni je bil vsak poslanec prisoten v EP in kje se je podpisal in/ali glasoval, pa tudi pri poimenskem glasovanju na plenarnih zasedanjih in v odborih; na katerih sejah institucionalnih organov je sodeloval (na plenarnem zasedanju in/ali v odborih in/ali delegacijah itd.); podatki bi morali biti na voljo tudi prek iskalnih meril, kot so ime poslanca / plenarno zasedanje / odbor / delegacija / glasovanje / prisotnost / dan / mesec / leto / zakonodajni mandat itd., povezave s to spletno stranjo pa bi bilo treba vključiti v spletne strani poslancev in v druge zadevne spletne strani; spletne strani poslancev Evropskega parlamenta bi morale vključevati te informacije ter imena asistentov, pripravljena mnenja, predloge sprememb na poročila in druge akte, vložene v odborih ali na plenarnih zasedanjih, razlage glasovanja, zvočne in slikovne prispevke, podpisane pisne izjave, vključno s seznami podpisov, itd.
MEPs' activities, participation in and attendance at Parliamentary work, in absolute, relative and percentage terms, available and accessible to citizens also through search criteria Such as: how many days each MEP has been present in the EP and where he has signed and/or voted, as well how when roll call votes take place, in plenary and in committee; in which institutional bodies' meetings he has participated, plenary and/or committee and/or delegation, etc; data should be available also through search criteria, such as name of the MEP / plenary / committee / delegation / votes / presence / day / month / year / legislative term / etc, and links to this webpage should be included in MEPs webpages and in other relevant websites; MEPs webpages should include this information as well as the name of the assistants, opinions given, amendments tabled in committee and plenary to reports and other acts, explanations of vote, audio-video interventions, written declarations signed, including the list of all signatories, etc;
in povezav do njih; s prenosi prek spleta bi moralo biti na spletni strani Parlamenta državljanom na voljo delo odborov in delegacij, kot so na voljo prenosi plenarnih zasedanj, in bi se morali shranjevati ter biti dosegljivi prek iskalnih meril; notranja telesa (kot so konferenca predsednikov, predsedstvo, kvestorji, delovna skupina za reformo Parlamenta itd.) bi morali spodbujali in zagotavljali najvišjo stopnjo preglednosti svojega dela nasproti drugim poslancem in državljanom z omogočanjem dostopa do vseh svojih dokumentov,
; committee and delegation work should be streamed on Parliament's website as plenary work is, and also recorded, and made available and accessible to citizens through search criteria; internal bodies (such as the Conference of Presidents, the Bureau, the Quaestors, the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform, etc) should promote and ensure the highest level of transparency of their work vis-a-vis other members and citizens by making all their documents available,
nadomestilih in izdatkih poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, skladno s stališčem evropskega varuha človekovih pravic glede tega, da bi moral dostop do informacij veljati tudi za tovrstne podatke Osnutek priporočila evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu v pritožbi 3643/2005/(GK)WP.
MEPs' allowances and spending, in conformity with the position taken by the European Ombudsman in relation to the fact that access to information should apply also to such data Draft recommendation of the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament in complaint 3643/2005/(GK)WP.
, pa tudi o vseh izjavah o finančnih interesih vseh poslancev, te informacije pa bi morale biti na voljo v vseh uradnih jezikih EU,
, as well as all declarations of financial interests for all MEPs, and that such information should be available in all EU official languages,
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva priporočilo evropskega varuha človekovih pravic (pritožba 3208/2006/GG) o registru Komisije, kar zadeva njeno obvezo, da "vključi sklicevanje na vse dokumente, v smislu člena 3(a), s katerimi razpolaga v registru, predvidenem v členu 11 [Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001], kolikor to še ni bilo storjeno";
Urges the Commission to follow the recommendation of the European Ombudsman (Complaint 3208/2006/GG) on the Commission register as regards its obligation to "include references to all the documents within the meaning of Article 3(a) that are in its possession in the register foreseen by Article 11 of [Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001], to the extent that this has not yet been done";
meni, da bi bil dostop do dokumentov in informacij lažji, če bi bili dokumenti vloženi, registrirani in ponovno uporabljeni s strani drugih institucij v skladu s skupnimi standardi (na primer za sklicevanje na različne verzije istega dokumenta ter predlogov sprememb, prilog in popravkov, ki se nanj nanašajo) Sedaj to ne velja, saj Komisija, Parlament in Svet sledijo različnim praksam.
Considers that retrieving documents and information would be easier if the documents themselves were tabled, registered and re-used by other legislative institutions in compliance with common standards (for instance for references to different versions of the same document, its amendments, annexes and corrigenda) This is not currently the case as the Commission, Parliament and Council follow different practices.
in sicer z uporabo urejevalnikov besedil z odprto kodo, dejanske večjezičnosti in tehnologij, ki omogočajo tudi invalidnim osebam dostop do informacij in dokumentov, kot je državam članicam predlagala Komisija v svojem sporočilu o interoperabilnostnih rešitvah za evropske javne uprave (ISA) ( KOM(2008)0583 ) in kot določa Direktiva 2003/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja UL L 345, 31.12.2003, str.
by using open-source word processors, effective multilingualism and technologies that also allow persons with disabilities to gain access to information and documents, as suggested by the Commission to the Member States in its Communication on interoperability solutions for European public administrations (ISA) (COM (2008)0583) and as provided for in Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p.
meni, da se navadni državljani pri dostopu do podatkov o institucijah EU še vedno srečujejo z mnogimi ovirami zaradi pomanjkanja učinkovite in k državljanom usmerjene medinstitucionalne politike preglednosti in komunikacije; meni, da bi morali imeti državljani EU možnost, da ne glede na točko dostopa sledijo danemu zakonodajnemu ali upravnemu postopku in da imajo dostop do vseh z njim povezanih dokumentov Gre na primer za izvirne predloge, zapisnike sej, poročila, predloge sprememb, glasovanja in rezultate glasovanj, razprave, veljavna besedila, izvajanje v državah članicah, poročila z oceno itd.
Believes that accessing information relating to the EU institutions still remains an obstacle-strewn path for ordinary citizens due to the lack of an effective citizen-oriented inter-institutional policy of transparency and communication; considers that regardless of the point of access, EU citizens should be able to track a given legislative or administrative procedure and access all the documents relating to it Such as the original proposal, minutes of meetings, reports, amendments, votes, result of votes, debates, text in force, implementation in Member States, evaluation reports, etc.
; že leta 2001 se bila podana zahteva, da se določi medinstitucionalni časovni načrt za izboljšanje, poenostavitev izpopolnitev registrov in spletnih strani institucij EU ter za zagotovitev njihove interoperabilnosti; institucije EU, ki bi rade vodile razvoj tehnik e-vlade bi morale biti sposobne in pripravljene vzpostaviti pravi medinstitucionalni iskalnik, s katerim bi postal dostop do dokumentov in podatkov uporabnikom bolj prijazen;
; as called for as early as in 2001, an inter-institutional road-map should be defined to improve, simplify and complete the EU institutions' registers and web pages and make them interoperable; EU institutions that aim to lead the development of e-government techniques should be able and willing to create a true inter-institutional search engine which would make access to documents and information more user-friendly for the public;
globoko obžaluje, da v nasprotju z določbami člena 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, številni pripravljalni zakonodajni dokumenti še niso registrirani (na primer gradiva za seje, o katerih razpravljajo zlasti v delovnih skupinah Sveta, ki jih je ustanovil Coreper I), ko pa jih registrirajo, niso opremljeni z medinstitucionalno kodo, zaradi česar jih ni mogoče vključiti v skupno medinstitucionalno evidenco v okviru pilotskega medinstitucionalnega projekta "Preglednost na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice" (Trans-JAI), začetega že leta 2004 in namenjenega zakonodajnim postopkom na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice; se seznani z novim rokom (2010), ki ga je na plenarnem zasedanju razglasil podpredsednik Wallström, in meni, da bo tudi ta rok zamujen, če ne bodo institucije EU nemudoma dale na voljo častnika za zvezo, ki bo lahko vstavljal medinstitucionalno kodo, kadar je na originalnih dokumentih ne bo; sedanje stanje ni le izguba javnega denarja, temveč tudi način, kako ne pustiti državljanov blizu pri vsakdanjih zakonodajnih opravilih na zelo občutljivih področjih, kot je območje svobode, varnosti in pravice; poziva Komisijo, naj predvidi začetek veljavnosti takšnega orodja na začetku naslednjega parlamentarnega obdobja;
Deeply regrets that, contrary to what is provided for in Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, many preparatory legislative documents are still not registered (such as the "room documents" mainly discussed within the Council working groups set up by Coreper 1) and when registered, they are missing the inter-institutional code so that it has proved impossible to merge them in a common inter-institutional record as part of the pilot inter-institutional project "Transparency in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice" (Trans-Jai) launched as far back as in 2004 for legislative procedures in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ); takes note of the new deadline (2010) announced in plenary by Vice-President Wallström, and considers therefore that this deadline will also be missed if the EU institutions do not immediately make available a liaison officer who could insert the inter-institutional code when it is missing in the original document; the current situation is not only a waste of public money but also a way to keep citizens at arm's length from daily legislative work in very sensitive areas such the AFSJ; urges the Commission to anticipate the entry into force of such a tool for the beginning of the next Parliamentary term;
meni, da bi morale institucije EU oblikovati enoten register/portal EU z informacijami in dokumenti, ki bi državljanom omogočal, da sledijo določenemu postopku in dostopajo do vseh dokumentov, ki so z njim povezani Gre na primer za izvirne predloge, zapisnike sej, poročila, predloge sprememb, glasovanja in rezultate glasovanj, razprave, veljavna besedila, izvajanje v državah članicah, poročila z oceno itd.
Believes that the EU institutions should create a single EU register/portal of information and documents, that should allow citizens to follow a certain procedure and access all the documents relating to it Such as the original proposal, minutes of meetings, reports, amendments, votes, result of votes, debates, text in force, implementation in Member States, evaluation reports, etc.
; takšen načrt bi moral vsebovati tako poenostavitev in dopolnitev njihovih registrov in spletnih strani ter medsebojno povezavo institucij EU kot njihovo vključitev v enoten EU portal; poziva, naj se pred začetkom naslednjega parlamentarnega mandata oblikuje medinstitucionalni bilten za vsakodnevno spremljanje, v katerem bi bile zbrane informacije in dokumenti, povezani z zakonodajnimi in nezakonodajnimi dejavnostmi EU ter njenim programom, kot je bilo leta 2004 načrtovano s projektom "Preglednost na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice" (Trans-JAI), ki je bil utemeljen na Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu leta 2004, vendar na žalost še ne deluje;
; such plan should go from simplifying and completing their registers and webpages and interconnecting them between EU institutions, to integrating them in a EU single portal; calls for the creation of an inter-institutional daily follow-up bulletin collecting information and documents related to EU legislative and non-legislative activities and agendas, as was planned with the Trans-Jai project founded on an inter-institutional agreement in 2004 and unfortunately not yet operational, before the beginning of the next Parliamentary term;
poziva institucije EU, naj zagotovijo, da je vsaj pred začetkom naslednjega mandata Parlamenta:
Calls on the EU institutions to ensure that, at least before the beginning of the next Parliamentary term:
v vseh pripravljalnih dokumentih naveden zakonodajni postopek,
all the preparatory documents mention the legislative procedure reference,
so v vseh dnevnih redih in zaključkih postopkov Sveta in pripravljalnih teles jasno navedeni referenčni dokumenti ter da so hitro in pravočasno registrirani in objavljeni v registru Sveta (tudi tako imenovana "gradiva za seje"),
all the agendas and outcome of the proceedings of the Council and preparatory bodies make clear reference to the background documents and are registered in good time and published in the Council Register (including the so called "room documents"),
državljanom pošteno in pregledno pojasnijo svoje organizacijske sheme in navedejo pristojnosti njihovih notranjih enot, notranji potek dela in približne roke za dosjeje, ki so v njihovi pristojnosti, ter na katere službe naj se državljani obrnejo, da bi pridobili podporo, informacije ali upravno varstvo,
they make clear to citizens in a fair and transparent way their organisational chart by indicating the remit of their internal units, the internal workflow and indicative deadlines of the dossier falling within their remit, to which services should citizens refer to obtain support, information or administrative redress,