natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja prizadevanja za usmeritev k evropskim referenčnim središčem in možnim koristim, ki jih bodo prinesla pri zdravljenju redkih bolezni; priznava, da lahko bolniki, oboleli za redkimi boleznimi ali stanji, pogosto potrebujejo večjo podporo pri dostopu do take specialistične oskrbe; poziva, da naj evropska referenčna središča ne bodo omejena le na redke bolezni, ampak razširjena na področje vseh bolezni, za katere je na voljo posebna koncentracija virov in strokovnega znanja; poudarja, da morajo, poleg zdravljenja teh bolezni, evropska referenčna središča igrati pomembno vlogo pri pridobitvi drugih mnenj in pri nadaljnjem usposabljanju medicinskih specialistov;
Welcomes efforts to move towards European Centres of Reference and the potential benefits that this will bring for treatment of rare diseases; recognises that patients affected by a rare disease or condition may often require greater support in accessing such specialist care; calls for the setting up of European Centres of Reference not to be limited to rare diseases but to be extended to cover all diseases for which a special concentration of resources and expertise is available; emphasises that, in addition to treating these diseases, European Centres of Reference should also play a prominent part in obtaining second opinions and in further training for medical specialists;
opozarja, da bo za podporo omrežja evropskih referenčnih središč potrebno dodatno financiranje;
Cautions that additional finances will be required to support a network of European Centres of Reference;
verjame, da lahko deljena uporaba zmogljivosti, še zlasti v primeru specializiranih oblik oskrbe, pomembno prispeva k povečani učinkovitosti storitev zdravstvene oskrbe;
Believes that the shared use of capacities, particularly in the case of specialised forms of care, can make an important contribution to increasing the effectiveness of healthcare services;
ugotavlja, da raziskava Univerze v Yorku o bolnikih v Združenem kraljestvu pri 87 % bolnikov kaže, da je glavni razlog njihovega zdravljenja v tujini krajše čakanje na zdravljenje kot v Angliji; kljub temu je prepričan, da si velika večina bolnikov želi in si bo še naprej želela zdravljenja kar najbližje domu;
Notes that in a University of York study of UK patients receiving treatment abroad 87% of patients stated the prospect of waiting longer for treatment in England as their motivation; nevertheless believes that the large majority of patients prefer and will continue to prefer to be treated as close to home as possible;
pozdravlja zavezanost Komisije k ohranjanju obstoječega prava o varstvu podatkov; ugotavlja pomen zagotavljanja učinkovitega in varnega načina izmenjavanja zdravstvenih kartonov med državami članicami;
Welcomes the Commission's commitment to upholding existing data protection law; notes the importance of providing an efficient and secure method of exchanging patient records between Member States;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije, ki določa "akcijski načrt e-zdravja" in priznava, da lahko informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, zlasti internet, izboljšajo dostopnost ter kakovost in učinkovitost zdravstvenih storitev, čeprav se lahko povečajo neenakosti kot posledica "digitalnega razkoraka"; poudarja potrebo po uporabi meril kakovosti na spletnih straneh, ki se nanašajo na zdravstveno varstvo; priznava vlogo, ki jo lahko imata telemedicina in telepsihiatrija pri izboljšanju možnosti bolnikov in zmanjšanju potrebe po mobilnosti bolnikov; meni, da je treba upoštevati tudi neenakosti v zvezi s starejšimi in nepismenimi osebami;
Welcomes the Commission communication setting out an "e-Health action plan", recognising that information and communication technologies, in particular the Internet, can help improve access to, and the quality and effectiveness of, health services, although it may also increase inequalities as a consequence of the "digital divide"; stresses the need to apply quality criteria for health-related websites; recognises the role that telemedicine and telepsychiatry could play in improving care options for patients and reducing the need for patient mobility; considers that account should also be taken of inequalities as regards the elderly and the illiterate;
spodbuja Komisijo k spremljanju uporabe evropske kartice zdravstvenega zavarovanja v državah članicah, da zagotavi, da države članice dajejo jasne in razumljive informacije javnosti o njenem delovanju;
Encourages the Commission to monitor the deployment of the European Health Card in Member States to ensure that Member States are providing clear and comprehensible information to the public about how the card works;
poziva Komisijo, da preuči, če je evropska kartica zdravstvenega zavarovanja lahko podlaga za spodbujanje skupnega pristopa k identifikatorjem bolnikov in za razvijanje novih funkcij, kot je shranjevanje podatkov o medicinski nujnosti, v skladu z akcijskim načrtom eEvropa 2005, ki ga je odobril Evropski svet v Sevilli z dne 21. in 22. junija 2002;
Asks the Commission to consider whether the European Health Card should form the basis for promoting a common approach to patient identifiers and developing new functions such as the storage of medical emergency data, in accordance with the eEurope 2005 Action Plan approved by the Seville European Council of 21 and 22 June 2002;
poziva Komisijo, da sestavi predlog za zapisovanje na evropsko kartico zdravstvenega zavarovanja, ob privolitvi zadevnih strani, ne le podrobnosti v zvezi z zavarovanjem, ampak tudi zdravstvenih podatkov v zvezi z bolniki, kar bi olajšalo njihovo mobilnost med državami članicami in prav tako zagotovilo ustrezen dostop do oskrbe in zdravljenja, ki ga zahteva njihovo zdravstveno stanje;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a proposal for recording on the European Health Card, with the consent of the parties concerned, not only insurance details but also medical data relating to patients, thereby facilitating their mobility between Member States and likewise ensuring appropriate access to the care and treatment that their state of health requires;
zahteva, da Komisija preuči, kako bi lahko bila evropska kartica zdravstvenega zavarovanja bolje prilagojena potrebam upokojencev iz ene države članice, ki začasno prebivajo ali se zadržujejo v drugi državi članici;
Requests that the Commission consider how the European Health Card can better relate to the needs of pensioners from one Member State temporarily residing or staying in another Member State;
ugotavlja pa, da mora vsaka nova funkcija evropske kartice zdravstvenega zavarovanja biti povezana z visoko ravnijo varstva podatkov ter da je treba na kartici pri shranjenih podatkih in izmenjanih informacijah med pristojnimi organi upoštevati obstoječe določbe o varstvu podatkov;
Notes, however, that there must be a high level of data protection in relation to any new functions of the European Health Card and that data stored on it and information exchanged between competent authorities must take account of existing provisions on data protection;
pozdravlja ustanovitev skupine na visoki ravni v okviru Komisije in tudi ustanovitev zdravstvene delovne skupine, ki se na uradni ravni sestaja v Svetu; zahteva, da Evropski parlament redno prejema posodobljene podatke Komisije in Sveta, ki se nanašajo na dejavnosti skupin; zahteva, da tudi Evropski parlament vsakih šest mesecev prejme poročilo skupine na visoki ravni;
Welcomes the establishment of the High Level Group in the Commission as well as the establishment of a Health Working Group meeting at official level in the Council; requests that the European Parliament receive regular updates from the Commission and from the Council on the Groups" activities; requests also that the European Parliament receive a report from the High Level Group every six months;
meni, da je varnost bolnikov odločilna za razvoj učinkovite zdravstvene politike EU; priznava potrebo po tesnejšem sodelovanju s svetovno zvezo za varnost bolnikov v okviru WHO; močno spodbuja skupino na visoki ravni, da v letu 2005 čim prej predloži predloge za mrežo varnosti bolnikov EU;
Believes that patient safety is critical to the development of effective health policy in the EU; recognises the need to work closely with the WHO World Alliance for Patient Safety; strongly encourages the High Level Group to bring forward proposals for an EU Patient Safety Network as soon as possible in 2005;
poudarja, da je treba zdravstveno varstvo in varnost bolnika upoštevati pri načrtovanju in izvajanju politike na drugih področjih; obžaluje občasno trenje med notranjim trgom in cilji zdravstvenega varstva; meni, da je zdravje državljanov predpogoj evropske gospodarske uspešnosti in konkurenčnosti;
Stresses that healthcare and patient safety considerations must be taken into account in the planning and implementation of policies in other areas; regrets the occasional friction between internal market and healthcare objectives; believes that the health of its citizens is a prerequisite to Europe's economic performance and competitiveness;
poudarja, da je ključna točka celotnega sistema bolnik, ki ga seveda zanima svoje zdravje in kakovost ter dostopnost zdravstvene oskrbe, ki je prejemnik oskrbe in ki plača oskrbo, ki jo prejme, neposredno ali prek zdravstvenega zavarovanja ali davkov; meni, da so bolniki povsem upravičeni, da se jih v celoti obvešča o zdravljenju in njihovem zdravstvenem stanju, in povsem upravičeni, da se jih vključi v odločanje v zvezi z uporabo zdravstvene oskrbe;
Emphasises that the focal point of the whole system is the patient, who has a natural interest in his or her own health and in the quality and accessibility of healthcare, who is the recipient of care and who pays for the care he or she receives, whether directly or through health insurance or taxation; believes, therefore, that patients are fully entitled to be kept completely informed about their treatment and their state of health and are fully entitled to be involved in decision-making with regard to healthcare consumption;
meni, da je treba vzpostaviti omrežje ustreznih informacij, dostopnih bolnikom, strokovnjakom zdravstvenega varstva in menedžerjem po vsej EU; zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija ustanovila zdravstveni portal EU, in upa, da bo portal po načrtih v spletu do konca leta 2005;
Believes that there is a need for a network of relevant information accessible to patients, health professionals and managers throughout the EU; welcomes, therefore, the establishment by the Commission of an EU Health Portal, and hopes that the Portal will be online by the end of 2005 as planned;
se strinja, da je treba tako državljanom, ki so bolni, zagotoviti pravno varnost in jasen pregled njihovih pravic in dolžnosti pri dostopu do zdravstvenega varstva in povračilu stroškov, nastalih v drugi državi članici;
Agrees that there is a need to provide citizens with legal certainty and a clear overview of their rights and duties as patients with regard to access to healthcare and reimbursement of costs incurred in another Member State;
meni, da je ključnega pomena sestava listine bolnikovih pravic, ki bi, med drugim, vsebovala zadeve v zvezi z njihovo mobilnostjo;
Considers it essential to draw up a Charter of Patients' Rights, which should cover, inter alia, matters relating to their mobility;
poziva Komisijo, da razvija smernice, ki bodo jasno opredeljevale pojme, kot so "brez nepotrebnega odlašanja", "ustaljena praksa", "primerljivi strošek", "bolnišnična oskrba", "izvenbolnišnična oskrba večjega obsega" in "izvenbolnišnična oskrba manjšega obsega", ter zagotovi največjo možno enotnost med državami članicami o zahtevah po predhodni odobritvi in razlagi "medicinsko upravičenega trajanja zdravljenja";
Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines to clearly define terms such as "without undue delay", "standard practices", "comparable cost", "hospital care", "major out-patient care" and "minor out-patient care", and to ensure maximum uniformity between Member States on prior authorisation requirements and on the interpretation of the term "a medically justifiable time-limit";
poudarja, da se mora čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo zagotavljati po potrebi ali v primeru časovno nesprejemljivih odlogov zdravljenja; meni, da so države članice odgovorne za zagotavljanje javne zdravstvene službe, ki temelji na načelu univerzalnega in neomejenega dostopa, s katero bo zagotovljeno, da ne bo prihajalo do nepotrebnega gibanja velikega števila bolnikov;
Stresses that cross-border healthcare should be delivered where necessary or in the event of temporary unacceptable delays in treatment; believes that the responsibility remains with Member States to ensure the existence of a public health service based on the principle of universal and unrestricted access that will make large-scale patient mobility unnecessary;
je zaskrbljen, da pogoji zdravljenja ne bi bili diskriminatorni do bolnikov z nizkim dohodkom, tako da na primer ne bi plačevali celotnih stroškov zdravljenja pred povračilom;
Is concerned that the terms of treatment should not discriminate against low-income patients so that, for example, they do not have to pay the full cost of treatment before reimbursement;
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije o odnosih med EU in OZN z dne 29. januarja 2004 UL C 96 E, 21.4.2004. str.
having regard to its resolution on EU-UN relations of 29 January 2004 OJ C 96 E, 21.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila "Varnejši svet: naša skupna odgovornost" Odbora na visoki ravni za preučitev groženj, izzivov in sprememb z dne 1. decembra 2004,
having regard to the report "A more secure world: our shared responsibility" by the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change of 1 December 2004,
ob upoštevanju poročila z dne 17. januarja 2005 "Vlaganje v razvoj: praktični načrt, kako doseči razvojne cilje tisočletja" OZN projekta tisočletja,
having regard to the report "Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals" by the UN Millennium Project of 17 January 2005,
ob upoštevanju poročila "V večji svobodi: na poti k razvoju, varnosti in človekovim pravicam za vse" generalnega sekretarja OZN z dne 21. marca 2005,
having regard to the report "In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all" by the Secretary-General of the UN of 21 March 2005,
ker poročilo Odbora na visoki ravni vsebuje več kot sto priporočil v zvezi s spremembami in potrebo po reformi OZN, da se bodo ti lahko soočili z izzivi in grožnjami, ki segajo od revščine, nalezljivih bolezni, okoljske škode in nasilja nad civilisti prek terorizma in orožja za množično uničevanje do neširjenja jedrskega orožja; ker poročilo generalnega sekretarja poudarja in odobrava večino teh priporočil,
whereas the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP) makes more than a hundred recommendations on change and the need to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non-proliferation; whereas the Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasises and endorses most of these recommendations,
ker poročilo Odbora na visoki ravni vsebuje novo vizijo kolektivne varnosti in se obravnava vse večje grožnje mednarodnega miru in varnosti, ki jih čutijo po vsem svetu,
whereas the RHP puts forward a new vision of collective security and addresses all of the major threats to international peace and security felt around the world,
ker je generalni sekretar, opirajoč se na poročilo Odbora na visoki ravni, poziva k reformi politike in institucij Združenih narodov, da bodo kos izzivom, ki izvirajo iz novih groženj in v izogib njihovi oslabitvi zaradi povečane neenotnosti med državami in njihovih enostranskih ukrepov,
whereas in the Secretary-General's view, following the RHP's recommendations, it is urgent that the policies and institutions of the United Nations be reviewed in order to rise to the challenge of meeting new threats and to avoid its erosion in the face of increased discord between States and unilateral action by them,
ker je v poročilu Odbora na visoki ravni nedvoumno navedeno, da bo uporaba sile, kadar bo potrebna, vedno zadnje sredstvo za reševanje sporov, ki ga je dovoljeno uporabiti le z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta, izdani po načelih o uporabi sile, ter nedvoumno odobrava "pojavljajoče se pravilo", da obstaja skupna mednarodna odgovornost za zaščito v primeru genocida in drugih obsežnih pobojev, etničnega čiščenja ali resnega kršenja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, katerih suverene vlade niso mogle ali niso hotele preprečiti,
whereas the RHP clearly states that the use of force, whenever necessary, should be deployed as a last resort, to be reiterated in a resolution of the Security Council on the principles relating to the use of force, and clearly endorses the "emerging norm" that there is a collective international responsibility to protect in the event of genocide and other large-scale killing, ethnic cleansing or serious violations of international humanitarian law, which sovereign governments have proved powerless or unwilling to prevent,
ker je okrepljena večstranskost, ki temelji na ustreznih institucijah in učinkovitih postopkih odločanja ter izvrševanja najbolj primerno orodje za premostitev težav in groženj, s katerimi se sooča mednarodna skupnost,
whereas genuine multilateralism is the most appropriate tool for solving the problems and threats faced by the international community, provided it is based on well-adapted institutions and efficient decision and enforcement processes,
ker je v poročilu generalnega sekretarja poudarjena potreba po dosegljivih konkretnih ukrepih in takojšnji reformi ter predstavljen niz konkretnih ukrepov, ki so jih voditelji držav in vlad zmožni sprejeti do septembra 2005,
whereas the RSG stresses the need for action and immediate reform, and presents a set of achievable concrete measures to be adopted by Heads of State and Government by September 2005,
ker si morajo države članice EU najbolj prizadevati za zagotovitev univerzalnega sodelovanja pri večstranskih konvencijah,
whereas EU Member States must be at the forefront of efforts to secure universal participation in multilateral conventions,
izrecno pozdravlja poročilo generalnega sekretarja, ki se ravna po poročilu Odbora na visoki ravni , in podpira temeljno odločenost trajno in korenito preoblikovati Združene narode, da se bo ta organizacija lažje prilagodila novim razmeram v svetu in postala bolj učinkovita, pravična, dolgoročno usmerjena in odgovorna pri zagotavljanju kolektivne varnosti v 21. stoletju; še posebej pozdravlja stvaren pristop v obeh poročilih, v katerih je vizija v nasprotju s prejšnjimi predlogi reform primerno usklajena z dejanskimi in praktično usmerjenimi izvedbenimi ukrepi;
Warmly welcomes the RSG following on from the RHP and strongly supports the underlying determination to achieve a consistent and thorough reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century; particularly welcomes the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action;
poziva Svet, da v celoti potrdi poročilo o reformi, ki ga je predložil Kofi Annan, in poziva luksemburško predsedstvo, da sodeluje pri uresničevanju sklepa Sveta o skupnem stališču EU do dejanskih reform OZN;
Calls on the Council fully to endorse the reform report presented by Kofi Annan and calls on the Luxembourg Presidency to engage in achieving a Council decision on a common EU position towards concrete UN reforms;
odobrava stališče, da se mora napredek na področju razvoja, varnosti in človekovih pravic prepletati ter da se reforme Združenih narodov ne sme obravnavati, kot sama sebi namen, ampak kot neizbežna posledica poglobljene analize političnih in varnostnih meril ter dejavnikov, ki obstajajo v novih in negotovih svetovnih razmerah; zato se zavzema za krepitev sistema Združenih narodov in njihovih institucij, saj ti predstavljajo najbolj primerne in edine globalne institucije, ki so potencialno sposobne na zakonit in hkrati učinkovit način spodbujati in zagotavljati kolektivno varnost;
Clearly endorses the view that progress in the areas of development, security and human rights must go hand in hand and that the reform of the United Nations should not be viewed as an end in itself, but rather as the ineluctable consequence of an in-depth analysis of the political and security parameters and factors at stake in a new and uncertain world environment; thus recommends strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient;
odobrava stroge omejitve pojma samoobrambe in uporabe orožja ter odgovornosti za varstvo civilnega prebivalstva, kot jih je opredelil Odbor na visoki ravni v skladu z duhom in besedilom Ustanovne listine OZN in se strinja, da takšna opredelitev naj ne ustavi preventivnih ukrepov Varnostnega sveta, tudi če bo igral bolj aktivno vlogo kot v preteklosti, saj je edini zakoniti organ za takšne ukrepe; ponovno opozarja, da je krizna zaščita učinkovita le, če imajo OZN stalna sredstva za stalni nadzor in opazovanje etničnih, jezikovnih ali verskih napetostih, ki bi se lahko razvile v krizo;
Approves the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations defined by the High-level Panel in accordance with the spirit and wording of the UN Charter, and agrees that such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively – and even in a more proactive manner than in the past – since it is the only legitimate body for such action; recalls that there can only be effective crisis protection if the UN has the means to monitor and to observe on a full-time basis the ethnic, linguistic or religious tensions likely to degenerate into a crisis;
ponavlja, da mora Varnostni svet pred nameravano uporabo sile vedno upoštevati naslednjih pet meril zakonitosti: stopnja ogroženosti, pravilen namen, zadnje sredstvo, sorazmernost sredstev in dopustitev posledic; se strinja, da je treba načela o uporabi sile in njeno zakonitost določiti z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta; predlaga, da se Varnostnemu svetu dovoli, da za namen obravnavanja jasno določenih razmer prek omejenega časovnega obdobja glede na posamezni primer prenese svoja pooblastila iz oddelka VII Ustanovne listine OZN na priznano regionalno organizacijo;
Reiterates that when considering the use of force the Security Council should always take into account the five criteria of legitimacy: seriousness of threat, proper purpose, last resort, proportional means and allowance for the consequences; agrees that the principles relating to the use of force and its authorisation should be laid down in a resolution of the Security Council; suggests that the Security Council be permitted, on a case-by-case basis for the purpose of dealing with a clearly defined situation over a limited period of time, to delegate its powers under Chapter VII of the UN Charter to a recognised regional organisation;