natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker druge regije in države sveta vedno več vlagajo v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije, zato bi morale biti naložbe EU na tem področju usmerjene v krepitev znanstvenih zmogljivosti, spodbujanje naložb v industriji in izboljšanje splošne konkurenčne zmožnosti EU; ker je treba v vsej „inovacijski verigi“ vzpostaviti sveženj usklajenih podpornih orodij, ki bodo zagotavljala ravnovesje med akademsko usmerjenim raziskovanjem, aplikativnimi znanstvenimi raziskavami in inovacijami,
F. whereas other regions and countries of the world are increasingly investing in R&D&I, and whereas EU investment in this domain should therefore be oriented towards a reinforcement of scientific capacity, encouragement of investment by industry and an improvement in overall EU competitive capacity; whereas the creation of a consistent set of support tools along the whole “innovation chain" is needed, ensuring proper balance between the academically oriented research, the applied scientific research and innovation,
G. ker se financiranje EU za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije sicer povečuje, vendar največji del razpoložljivih sredstev v okviru različnih okvirnih shem in programov financiranja (vključno z obsežnimi projekti) še vedno lahko pridobijo znanstveno in tehnološko naprednejše države članice EU, zaradi česar ostajajo nekatere države članice in evropske regije slabše zastopane glede dostopa do financiranja, pa tudi udeležbe; ker se je treba za dokončanje evropskega raziskovalnega prostora usmeriti v odličnost v vseh delih Unije, strukturni skladi in kohezijski sklad pa so poglavitno orodje za to,
G. whereas, although EU funding for R&D&I has been increasing, scientifically and technologically more developed EU Member States are still able to absorb the greatest slice of the available resources under the various Framework funding schemes and programmes (including large-scale projects), perpetuating the under-representativeness of some Member States and their regions in terms both of access to funding and of participation; whereas, in the interest of completing the European Research Area (ERA), the emergence of excellence in all parts of the Union needs to be aimed at, and whereas the Structural and Cohesion Funds are the prime instrument to achieve this,
H. ker so v EU še vedno velike in celo vse večje neenakosti glede nacionalnih zmogljivosti za financiranje raziskav in razvoja, industrijskih struktur in sistemov visokošolskega izobraževanja, te razlike pa se deloma odražajo tudi v splošni udeležbi v sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave; ker je treba vzpostaviti mehanizme za uravnoteženje raziskovalnih in inovacijskih zmogljivosti vseh držav članic in evropskih regij,
H. whereas there are still significant and growing inequalities within the EU in terms of national levels of R&D funding capacities, industrial structures and higher education systems, and whereas those differences are partly mirrored in overall participation in FP7; whereas balancing mechanisms should be put in place in order to enhance the research and innovation capacities of all Member States and European regions,
I. ker bi bilo treba skupni strateški okvir oblikovati po istih načelih kot evropski raziskovalni prostor, pri čemer bi izkoristili ogromni neizkoriščeni potencial za uskladitev 27 različnih nacionalnih raziskovalnih strategij in programov ter s tem zmanjšali nepotrebno razdrobljenost,
I. whereas the Common Strategic Framework (CSF) should be modelled on the same general principles as the ERA, capitalising on the enormous untapped potential for coordinating the 27 different national research strategies and programmes and reducing unnecessary fragmentation,
J. ker se velik pomen malih in srednjih podjetij za gospodarstvo in zaposlovanje v EU ne odraža tudi v ravni njihove udeležbe pri evropskih sredstvih za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije; ker bi morala udeležba tovrstnih podjetij v projektih raziskav, razvoja in inovacij doseči 15-odstotni delež in ker priznava, da je sodelovanje z industrijo spodbudilo občutna vlaganja industrije v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije, tako da sta poenostavitev in odprava odvečne birokracije nujen pogoj za uresničitev omenjenega cilja in za večjo udeležbo industrije kot celote;
J. whereas the great importance of SMEs for the EU economy and employment is not mirrored in their level of participation in EU R&D&I funds; whereas the participation of SMEs in R&D&I collaborative projects should reach a level of 15% and whereas, recognising that collaborative work with industry has encouraged significant investment in R&D&I by industry, simplification and cutting red tape are a necessary condition for reaching this aim and increasing the participation of industry as a whole,
K. ker bolezni, povezane z revščino, in zapostavljene bolezni ovirajo gospodarski razvoj, zlasti v državah v razvoju; ker tovrstne bolezni prizadenejo več kot milijardo ljudi in vsako leto povzročijo milijone smrtnih žrtev,
K. whereas poverty-related and neglected diseases hamper economic development, especially in developing countries; whereas such diseases affect more than a billion people and cause millions of deaths every year,
L. ker na univerzah diplomira več kot 60 % študentk, večino visokih akademskih mest (na primer doktorskih in profesorskih) pa še vedno zasedajo moški,
L. whereas over 60 % of students graduating from universities are women, but the majority of senior positions in universities (e.g. PhD posts and professorships) are still held by men,
M. ker je bilo od ustanovitve Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta v letu 2007 za sredstva iz njegovega proračuna izbranih 1700 projektov, kar znaša okoli 2,5 milijarde EUR, pri čemer je bilo skoraj 90 % teh sredstev dodeljenih moškim kandidatom,
M. whereas since the start of the European Research Council (ERC) in 2007, 1 700 projects have been selected to receive funding from the ERC, representing some EUR 2.5 billion in grants, and almost 90% of these grants went to male candidates,
N. ker ima vtis, da za raziskovalke obstaja problem „steklenega stropa“, kar pomeni, da je delež raziskovalk v obratnem sorazmerju z višino položaja v hierarhiji,
N. whereas a highly problematic ‘glass ceiling’ seems to exists for female researchers, meaning that the share of female researchers decreases with seniority,
O. ugotavlja, da so v izobraževalnih sistemih številnih držav članic na raziskovalnih področjih, kot je denimo naravoslovje, še vedno močno prisotni spolni stereotipi,
O. whereas in the educational systems of many Member States gender stereotypes still prevail in research areas such as the natural sciences
Gl. resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o ženskah in znanosti, odstavek 2.
See European Parliament resolution on women and science, paragraph 2.
2. meni, da imajo raziskovalni skladi in programi ter strukturni skladi in kohezijski sklad različne cilje in morajo zato ostati ločeni;
Takes the view that EU research funds and programmes and the Structural and Cohesion Funds have different aims and, as such, should be kept separate;
8. poziva, da bi glede na prihodnjo usmeritev kohezijske politike v strategijo Evropa 2020 naložili obvezno prednostno nalogo glede inovacij v regijah , ki jih zajemata cilja 1 in 2, to pa se mora odražati tudi v dodeljevanju sredstev na vseh ravneh;
In the light of the future gearing of cohesion policy to the Europe 2020 Strategy, calls for the ‘innovation’ priority to be binding on both Objective 1 and Objective 2 regions, and for that priority to be reflected in the funding allocated at all levels;
14. poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju in sinergiji med lokalnimi in regionalnimi, nacionalnimi in evropskimi čezmejnimi raziskovalnimi in inovacijskimi strategijami, pri čemer je treba spoštovati posebnosti različnih okolij, obenem pa povečati možnosti za dopolnjevanje in sodelovanje med njimi; je prepričan, da so za večjo učinkovitost financiranja in sofinanciranja poglavitni izmenjava informacij in najboljše prakse, skupna prizadevanja za načrtovanje programov, preprosta in prožna pravila in instrumenti, po potrebi pa tudi konvergenca;
Calls for better coordination and synergy between local and regional, national and European cross-border research and innovation strategies, respecting the specificities of the different contexts and, at the same time, reinforcing the possibilities for complementarities and cooperation between them; believes that access to and sharing of information and best practices, enhanced joint programming efforts, simple, flexible rules and instruments and, where appropriate, convergence of the latter is of key importance to increasing the effectiveness of funding, and possibly of co-funding;
§ demografske spremembe v starajoči se evropski družbi, pa tudi starostne bolezni in družinska politika, naraščanje svetovnega prebivalstva, zapostavljene bolezni, prehrana in zanesljivost preskrbe s hrano, urbanizacija, mobilnost, družbena kohezija in migracije,
§ the demographic changes as an ageing society in Europe, including age related diseases and family policies, a growing world population, neglected diseases, nutrition/food security, urbanisation, mobility, social cohesion and migration,
§ prehod k trajnostnemu gospodarjenju z viri – trajnostno upravljanje voda, raba in upravljanje zemljišč, blaženje podnebnih sprememb, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, morskih ekosistemov in gozdarstvo, obnovljivi viri energije in energetska učinkovitost, nujno potrebne surovine ter drugi biološki in fizični naravni viri,
§ the transition to sustainable management of scarce resources, including water, land use and soil management, mitigation of climate change, preservation of biodiversity, marine ecosystems and forestry, renewable energies, energy efficiency and energy security, critical raw materials and other biological and physical natural resources,
§ močna, stabilna in pravična gospodarska baza, gospodarsko okrevanje, izboljšanje izobraževanja in usposabljanja, okrepitev temeljnega in aplikativnega znanja v vseh strokah, od družbenih in humanističnih ved prek drugih področij, kot sta biologija in medicina ter raziskave civilne varnosti za državljane in infrastrukturo, do ključnih tehnologij, ki so potrebne za razcvet gospodarstva in zaposlovanja v EU;
§ a strong, stable and equitable economic base, including economic recovery, the enhancement of education and training and of fundamental and applied knowledge in all disciplines from social sciences and humanities, through other domains such as biological and medical sciences and research for the civil security of citizens and infrastructures, to key technologies in order to boost the EU's economy and employment;
meni, da bi moral biti skupni strateški okvir osredotočen zlasti na celostno odzivanje na te vélike družbene izzive z uravnoteženim naborom instrumentov, ki bi vključevali cel spekter dejavnosti na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja, raziskav in inovacij;
Believes that the CSF should focus on addressing those societal challenges in a comprehensive way through a balanced set of instruments covering the whole spectrum of education and training, research and innovation activities;
Na poti k novemu skupnemu strateškemu okviru
Towards a new Common Strategic Framework (CSF)
23. ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba v upravnih pravilih skupnega strateškega okvira, ki urejajo pogodbene postopke, upoštevati različne nacionalne predpise glede univerz in raziskovalnih centrov; zlasti pa poudarja, da mehanizem sofinanciranja ne bi smel delovati na škodo univerz in raziskovalnih inštitutov ter v nobenem primeru ne sme potisniti univerz v slabši položaj, kot so drugi akterji;
Notes that, in order to allow all researchers to take part in CSF projects, administrative rules covering contracting procedures should take into account the different national rules on universities and research centres; stresses in particular that the co-financing mechanism should not operate to the detriment of universities and research institutes, and that under no circumstances should universities be placed at a disadvantage compared with other actors;
25. je prepričan, da je treba različne naloge znotraj skupnega strateškega okvira obravnavati ločeno, vendar v tesnem medsebojnem odnosu: Evropski inštitut za inovacije in tehnologijo naj deluje predvsem kot mreža skupnosti znanja in inovacij, okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovativnost pa naj se osredotoči na svojo prednost pri podpiranju inovativnih malih in srednjih podjetij; naslednji okvirni program naj obravnava raziskave kot celoto, strukturne sklade in kohezijski sklad pa je treba uporabiti bolj usmerjeno, vendar morajo ostati ločeni; meni, da bi morali projekti sodelovanja ostati hrbtenica skupnega strateškega okvira;
Is convinced that different tasks within the CSF should be tackled separately but in close articulation and partnership with each other: the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) to operate mainly as a network of Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs); the innovation-related parts of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP) to concentrate on its strength in supporting innovative SMEs; the next FP to embrace research as a whole; and the structural/cohesion funds to be used in closer cooperation and in a more targeted way, but kept separate; takes the view that collaborative projects should remain the backbone of the CSF;
Prva raven: gradnja zmogljivosti in infrastruktura
1 st Layer: Capacity building and infrastructure
30. poziva k okrepitvi skupnega raziskovalnega središča kot notranjega dobavitelja znanstvenih in gospodarskih analiz za razvojne politike v skladu s strategijo Evropa 2020;
Calls for the role of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) as an internal supplier of scientific and economic analyses for development policy in line with the Europe 2020 strategy to be strengthened;
Druga raven: raziskave, potencial, sodelovanje in konsolidacija
2nd Layer: Research, Potential, Collaboration and Consolidation
34. tu so ključne besede izvirnost in veljavnost zamisli, kakovost ter potencial za znanstveno odličnost in dodano vrednost projektov, sem pa spadajo raziskave z visokim tveganjem in projekti „netehnoloških“ in „socialnih“ inovacij; poslovni načrt in tržni potencial sta tudi pozitivna dejavnika, nista pa nujna za odobritev projekta;
The key words here are originality and relevance of the idea, quality and potential for scientific excellence and added-value of projects, including high-risk research and projects concerning “non-technological innovation and social innovation”; the business plan and market potential are positive factors to be considered but not necessary conditions for approval;
36. poziva k večji prožnosti sheme za financiranje, da bi malim in srednjim podjetjem približali projekte sodelovanja, če bi jim shema omogočala, da se vključijo med samim izvajanjem projektov, kjer bi bilo to mogoče, in da bi v ta namen predvidevala odprto proračunsko postavko za projekt; meni, da bi mala in srednja podjetja na ta način jasneje videla priložnosti, saj bi se skrajšal čas od vstopa v projekt do trženja rezultatov;
Calls for a more flexible funding scheme in order to make the Cooperation theme more attractive for SMEs, whereby SMEs would be able to join collaborative projects during the projects implementation where possible, and an open budget line for this should be available for the project; believes that in this way the SME can see the opportunities more clearly since the timeframe from entering the project to market results is shortened;
39.meni, da obstajajo nadaljnje možnosti za razširitev koncepta Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta na skupne in večdisciplinarne raziskovalne projekte, če bi ohranili naravo „od spodaj navzgor“ in če bo glavno merilo za izbor znanstvena odličnost;
39.Believes there is further potential for extending the scope of the ERC concept to collaborative and multidisciplinary research projects, provided they maintain a bottom-up nature and scientific excellence is kept as the major selection criterion;
Tretja raven: trg in inovacije za skupne cilje
3 rd Layer: Market and innovation towards common goals
45. se zaveda, da je treba udeležbi malih in srednjih podjetij nameniti posebno pozornost, da se jim na prožen in učinkovit način omogoči uporaba novih zamisli in priložnosti, saj to odpira nove poti za inovacije; poudarja, da je opredelitev malih in srednjih podjetij po sektorjih predpogoj za njihovo uspešno udeležbo v skupnem strateškem okviru; ugotavlja, da je uspeh inovacijskih dejavnosti odvisen tudi od sposobnosti in izkušenj vodstvenega osebja;
Recognises that particular attention should be devoted to SMEs’ involvement, in order to enable the exploitation of new ideas and opportunities in a flexible and effective way as they emerge, opening new avenues for innovation; stresses that a sector-specific definition of SMEs is a prerequisite for their successful participation in the CSF; notes that the success of innovation activities depends also on the skills and experience of management staff;
· „mehka“ posojila, ki bi jih prejemniki v primeru uspeha vrnili, vendar brez upravnih stroškov,
· soft loans, which are reimbursed in the event of success, excluding administrative costs;
· prizadevati bi si bilo treba za celovito financiranje malih in srednjih podjetij (predvsem v zagonski fazi), ki bi zajemalo ves inovacijski ciklus, tudi dostopanje do raziskovalno-razvojnih storitev in svetovanja,
· efforts to provide comprehensive funding for SMEs (particularly in the seed and start-up phase) that will cover the full innovation cycle, including for accessing R&D services and advice;
· sklad za financiranje na osnovi delitve tveganja bi se moral uporabljati tako, da bi bilo mogoče manjše zneske zagotoviti prek nacionalnih posrednikov,
· the RSFF to be applied in such a way that granting of smaller funds is possible via national intermediates;
· lažje dostopanje do tveganega kapitala,
· easier access to risk and venture capital;
· večja udeležba malih in srednjih podjetij v določanju raziskovalnih časovnih načrtov;
· greater participation of SMEs in the setting of the research agendas;
– širiti njihovo uporabo v različnih industrijskih in storitvenih sektorjih,
– disseminating their use in various industrial and service sectors,
– uvesti dodatne, drugačne oblike uporabe na sorodnih ali dopolnilnih področjih;
– launching further additional applications in related or complementary fields;
59. je prepričan, da bi s poenostavitvijo moralo priti do zmanjšanja kombinacij stopenj financiranja in metod izračunavanja posrednih stroškov v vseh shemah financiranja, ne da bi odpravili razlikovanje med univerzami, raziskovalnimi organizacijami in industrijo;
Is convinced that simplification should lead to a reduction in the combination of funding rates and indirect costs calculation methods across financing schemes without, however, abolishing the differentiation applying for universities, research organisations and industry;
61. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj olajšajo dostop do evropskih raziskovalnih programov, na primer z vzpostavitvijo enotne kontaktne točke, načela en projekt – en dokument in foruma za izmenjavo dobre prakse; ob tem poudarja, da je potrebna zlahka dostopna enotna dostopna točka do svetovanja in finančne podpore za morebitne udeležence; graja premajhno preglednost in informacije o prihodnjih pozivih za zbiranje predlogov o raziskovalnih projektih, zaradi česar se raziskovalci in inštituti ne morejo ustrezno pripraviti, tako da ne morejo sodelovati;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make access to European research programmes easier, for example by setting up a single contact point, establishing a principle of ‘one project, one document’ and setting up a forum for exchange of good practice; in this respect, reiterates the need for an easily accessible single entry point to advice and financial support for potential participants; criticises the current lack of transparency and information on upcoming calls for proposals for research projects, which results in researchers and institutes being unable to properly prepare themselves and therefore impedes their participation;
Nekaj smernic za naslednji okvirni program
Some guidelines for the next Framework Programme
67. meni, da skupni strateški okvir ne bi smel biti omejen samo na inovacije, ki temeljijo na raziskavah in tehnologiji, temveč bi moral podpirati tudi druge vire inovacij; poudarja, da veliko podjetij – predvsem mala in srednja – uporablja druge vire inovacij, na primer stranke, trge, uporabnike in celo zaposlene, ter da je ta oblika inovacij pogosto bolj praktična in usmerjena k reševanju konkretnih problemov, povezanih s postopki, storitvami ali izdelki, saj predlagane rešitve pogosto prešinejo zaposlene, ki so najbližje proizvodnemu procesu, trge in stranke; meni, da bi morala EU okrepiti praktične inovacije delavcev;
Believes that the CSF should not be limited to focusing on research-driven or technology-based innovation alone, but that it should support different sources of innovation; points out that many companies – especially SMEs – use other sources of innovation such as clients, markets, users and, not least, employees, and that this form of innovation is often of a more practical nature and is focused on solving specific problematic issues related to processes, services or products, since the proposed solutions are often found by the employees that are closest to the production process, markets and clients; believes, therefore, that the EU should strengthen practice-oriented, employee-driven innovation;
70. izraža pomisleke glede učinkovitosti uporabe sredstev za ustvarjanje raziskovalnih mrež odličnosti, organizacijo konferenc in prireditev ter poziva k ukrepom za okrepitev elektronskega mreženja na področju raziskav in inovacij ter k razširjanju rezultatov raziskav prek interneta;
Voices its scepticism about the effectiveness of utilising the funds for creating research networks of excellence and organising conferences and events and calls for a strengthening of electronic networking measures for research and innovation and the dissemination of research results via the Internet;
73. da bi še nadalje spodbujali zanimanje in udeležbo državljanov in civilne družbe v raziskavah, poziva k nadaljevanju podprograma „Znanost v družbi“ kot samostojne teme in tudi k njegovemu horizontalnemu širjenju, da bi zajel velike družbene izzive; poleg tega meni, da bi morala Komisija podpirati nadaljnji razvoj in širše razširjanje etičnih smernic ter nadaljnji razvoj instrumentov, namenjenih organizacijam civilne družbe;
In order further to attract the interest and involvement of citizens and civil society in research, calls for the continuation of the Science in Society theme as a stand-alone and for its horizontal expansion to cover the great societal challenges; in addition, believes that the Commission should support further development and wider dissemination of guidelines on ethics, and the further development of instruments designed for Civil Society Organisations (CSOs);
75. meni, da ni pomembno ocenjevanje in vrednotenje posameznih raziskovalnih programov samo z ekonomskega vidika, temveč tudi vrednotenje z družbenega in etičnega vidika ter vidika trajnosti, ki ga je treba izboljšati in širše spodbujati tako na evropski kot na nacionalni ravni; podpira pobude Komisije na tem področju, na primer razvoj načel odgovornih raziskav in inovacij, ter spodbuja njihovo nadaljnjo promocijo in uporabo;
Believes that not only economic, but also societal, ethical and sustainability assessment and evaluation of the specific research programmes is an important process that must be improved and more widely promoted, at both European and Member State level; supports the Commission's initiatives in this field, such as the development of Responsible Research and Innovation principles, and encourages their further promotion and uptake;