natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju sklepa odbora LIBE, da pozove Agencijo za temeljne pravice, naj izda letno poročilo o razmerah na področju svobode medijev v državah članicah EU,
– having regard to the decision by the LIBE Committee to request the Fundamental Rights Agency to issue an annual report on the situation of media freedom in the EU Member States,
A. ker Evropska unija temelji na vrednotah, navedenih v členu 2 PEU, zato tudi jamči in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je zapisano v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, pri čemer sta svoboda in pluralizem medijev osnovni pravici, ti pravici pa zajemata svobodo izražanja mnenja ter svobodo prejemanja in posredovanja informacij brez vmešavanja ali pritiska javnih oblasti,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values spelled in article 2 TEU and consequently guarantees and promotes freedom of expression and of information, as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, for which media freedom and pluralism are an essential prerequisite, and whereas these rights include freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without interference or pressure from public authorities,
B. ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, zlasti v Italiji, Bolgariji, Romuniji, Češki republiki in Estoniji, kot je bilo izpostavljeno ob nedavnih kritikah med junijem in decembrom 2010 uvedenega zakona o medijih na Madžarskem, ki so jih izrazile mednarodne organizacije, kot so OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, poklicna združenja novinarjev, urednikov in publicistov, nevladne organizacije s področja človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Evropska komisija,
B. whereas media pluralism and freedom continues to be a grave concern in the EU and its Member States, notably in Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, Czech Republic, Estonia, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media laws in Hungary introduced between June and December 2010, expressed by international organisations, such as OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, professional organisations of journalists, editors and publishers, human rights and civil liberties NGOs, as well as by Member States and the European Commission,
C. ker je Komisija izrazila pomisleke in od madžarske vlade zahtevala informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo madžarskega zakona o medijih z zakonodajo EU, vključno z Listino temeljnih svoboščin EU in direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, in sicer kar zadeva obveznost o uravnoteženem poročanju, ki velja za vse ponudnike avdiovizualnih storitev, načelo države izvora in zahteve za prijavo, madžarska vlada pa se je odzvala tako, da je zagotovila dodatne informacije in izrazila pripravljenost, da omenjeni zakon ponovno pregleda in spremeni,
C. whereas the Commission has raised doubts and requested information to the Hungarian government in relation to the conformity of the Hungarian media laws with EU law, including the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the AVMSD in relation to the obligation of balanced coverage imposed to all audiovisual media service providers, the country of origin principle and the registration requirements, and whereas the Hungarian government responded by providing further information and by declaring their readiness to review the laws and amend them,
ter navedla, da nova zakonodaja ogroža pluralizem medijev, ukinja politično in finančno neodvisnost javnih medijev, dolgoročno utrjuje negativne značilnosti za svobodne medije, da sta organ za medije in Svet politično homogena Pismo predstavnika OVSE za svobodo medijev predsedniku odbora EP LIBE, 14. januar 2010.
, indicating that the new legislation undermines media pluralism, abolishes the political and financial independence of public service media, cements the negative features for free media for the long term, that the Media Authority and Council are politically homogeneous Letter by OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media to the EP Chairman of the LIBE committee, 14.01.2010.
in izvajata razširjen in centraliziran vladni in politični nadzor nad vsemi mediji; nadaljnji pomisleki zadevajo denimo nesorazmerne in izredno stroge kazni za prekrške iz spornih in neopredeljenih razlogov, nemožnost avtomatične prekinitve kazni, ki jo naloži organ za medije, v primeru pritožbe nanjo sodišču, kršitev načela zaupnosti novinarskih virov, varstvo družinskih vrednot,
and exert a pervasive and centralized governmental and political control on all media; further concerns are the disproportionate and extreme sanctions for debatable and undefined reasons, the lack of an automatic suspension of sanctions in case of appeal to courts against a Media authority sanction, the violation of the principle of the confidentiality of journalistic sources, the protection of family values, among others,
E. ker je komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice madžarske oblasti pozval, naj pri ponovnem pregledu v zakon o medijih vključijo standarde Sveta Evrope o svobodi izražanja in pluralizmu medijev, ustrezna priporočila odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope, zlasti zavezujoče standarde iz Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in sodno prakso sodišča v Strasbourgu; navedel je uporabo nejasnih opredelitev, ki se jih lahko narobe razume, ustanovitev politično neuravnoteženega regulativnega mehanizma z nesorazmernimi pooblastili in pomanjkanjem popolnega sodnega nadzora, ogrožanje neodvisnosti javnih medijev in izpodkopavanje zaščite novinarskih virov informacij; ker je poudaril, da morajo imeti vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, tudi opozicijske stranke in civilna družba, možnost smotrnega sodelovanja pri pregledu te zakonodaje, ki določa tako bistveni vidik delovanja demokratične družbe http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp .
E. whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner on Human rights called the Hungarian authorities to incorporate Council of Europe standards on freedom of expression and media pluralism when reviewing its media laws, the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and notably the binding standards contained in the ECHR and the case-law of the Strasbourg Court; he referred to the use of unclear definitions that may be subject to misinterpretation; the establishment of a politically unbalanced regulatory machinery with disproportionate powers and lack of full judicial supervision; threats to the independence of public-service broadcast media; and erosion of the protection of journalists’ sources; whereas he stressed the need for all relevant stakeholders, including opposition parties and civil society, to be able to participate in a meaningful manner in the review of this legislation, which regulates such a fundamental aspect of the functioning of a democratic society http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp
F. ker bi bilo treba zato ta zakon nujno ponovno pregledati na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Komisije, OVSE in Sveta Evrope za zagotovitev, da bo dosledno skladen z zakonodajo EU ter evropskimi vrednotami in standardi glede svobode izražanja in obveščanja ter svobode in pluralizma medijev,
F. whereas the media laws consequently should be urgently reviewed on the basis of the Commission, OSCE and the Council of Europe remarks and proposals, to ensure that it is fully in conformity with EU law and European values and standards on freedom of expression and information, media freedom and pluralism,
G. ker je Komisija doslej odlašala s predlogom direktive o svobodi in pluralizmu medijev, ki je vedno bolj potreben in nujen, čeprav jo je Parlament k temu večkrat pozval, in ker Evropska unija od držav kandidatk zahteva, da izpolnijo köbenhavnska merila, ki zajemajo svobodo in pluralizem medijev, se ta merila izpolnjujejo tudi v EU na podlagi tovrstne direktive;
G. whereas despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on minimum standards on media freedom and pluralism, the Commission has up to now delayed this proposal, which has become increasingly necessary and urgent and whereas the European Union requires candidate countries to abide by the Copenhagen criteria that include media freedom and pluralism, these principles shall be enforced also in the EU through a such a directive,
1. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da pozove k pojasnitvi madžarskega zakona o medijih in njegove skladnosti s Pogodbami in pravom EU, pa tudi z izjavami madžarskih oblasti, da so omenjeni zakon pripravljene spremeniti;
Welcomes the initiative of the Commission to call for clarifications on the Hungarian media laws and their conformity with EU Treaties and law, as well as the announcement made by the Hungarian authorities in relation to their readiness to amend the laws;
4. poziva Komisijo, naj določi kratek rok, v katerem naj bi madžarske oblasti zakon spremenile v skladu s točkami, ki so jih podali OVSE, Svet Evrope in Komisija, in naj v primeru neupoštevanja roka sprejme ustrezne ukrepe;
Calls the Commission to set a close deadline for the Hungarian authorities to change the law on the points raised by OSCE, the Council of Europe and the Commission, and take appropriate measures shall the deadline not be met;
7. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope ter vladam in nacionalnim parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice in OVSE.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and national parliaments of Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency and the OSCE.
PE459.637v01-00 B7‑0105/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Evropi 2020
PE459.637v01-00 B7‑0105/2011 European Parliament resolution on Europe 2020
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom„Letni pregled rasti : napredek EU pri celovitem odzivu na krizo,
– having regard to the Commission's communication ‘Annual Growth Survey: advancing the EU's comprehensive response to the crisis’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Evropa 2020: strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“,
– having regard to the- having regard to the Commission's communication ‘ Europe 2020: a strategy for a smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. junija 2010 o gospodarskem upravljanju in EU 2020,
– having regard its resolutions of 16 June 2010 on economic governance and EU 2020,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o finančni, gospodarski in socialni krizi,
– having regard its resolution of 20 October 2010 on the financial, economic and social crisis,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. decembra 2010 o stalnem mehanizmu za reševanje krize,
– having regard its resolution of 16 December 2010 on the permanent crisis mechanism,
– – ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to the article 3 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union,
A. ker se več držav članic še vedno spopada z naraščanjem nezaposlenosti, saj je brez dela že več kot 23 milijonov ljudi, zaradi šibke rasti v večini držav članic in drugih ključnih regijah sveta pa jih bo še več, to pa povzroča ogromne težave v življenju družbe in ljudi;
A. whereas many Member States are still facing rising unemployment, with more than 23 million people out of work, and more to come due to anaemic growth in most member states and in other key regions in the world, thereby generating immense social and human difficulties,
B. ker je kriza dramatično razkrila šibkosti obstoječega sistema upravljanja v evroobmočju, pomanjkanje skupnih konceptov in instrumentov pa je privedlo do krize verodostojnosti in do dragega odlašanja političnih odločitev v državah članicah,
B. whereas the crisis has dramatically exposed the weaknesses of the existing euro area governance system, and the lack of common concepts and instruments has led to a crisis of credibility and to costly political hesitations among Member States,
C. ker so vzpostavitev stalnega mehanizma za reševanje krize zaradi ohranitve finančne stabilnosti evroobmočja in najnovejši zakonodajni predlogi Komisije o reformi pakta stabilnosti in rasti ter uvedbi nadzornega postopka za makroekonomska neravnovesja potreben, vendar še vedno nezadosten korak v smeri ekonomske in monetarne unije s polnimi pooblastili,
C. whereas the creation of a permanent crisis mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area and the current legislative proposals by the Commission for a reform of the stability and growth pact and for the creation of a surveillance procedure for macroeconomic imbalances are a necessary but still insufficient step in the direction of a fully-fledged economic and monetary union,
D. ker bi morala strategija Evropa 2020 Evropi pomagati, da okreva in da bo ob izhodu iz krize močnejša, in sicer s pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rastjo, ki bo temeljila na petih krovnih ciljih EU glede spodbujanja zaposlovanja: izboljšanju pogojev za inovacije, raziskave in razvoj, izpolnjevanju ciljev v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami in energijo ter izboljšanju ravni izobrazbe in spodbujanju socialnega vključevanja, zlasti z zmanjšanjem revščine,
D. whereas the EU 2020 strategy should help Europe recover from the crisis and come out stronger, through a jobs and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth based on five EU headline targets as regards promoting employment; improving the conditions for innovation, research and development; meeting our climate change and energy objectives; improving education levels and promoting social inclusion in particular through the reduction of poverty,
2. poudarja, da je nujno potrebna dosledna in bolje usklajena strategija, da se okrepi politična odgovornost držav pri izvajanju strategije in zagotovi njen uspeh ter konkretne rezultate;
Stresses that a more consistent and coherent strategy is a prerequisite to strengthen the political ownership of the strategy at national levels and to ensure delivery and concrete achievements;
4. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi pobud o ustvarjanju novih orodij za okrepljeno usklajevanje gospodarskih politik med državami članicami evroobmočja zunaj okvira Skupnosti; meni, da bi morali strategija Evropa 2020 ter aktualni zakonodajni predlogi o gospodarskem upravljanju, o katerih poteka razprava, zagotavljati boljše usklajevanje v okviru Pogodbe, svari, da bodo napadi na delovno zakonodajo in kolektivna pogajanja še bolj spodkopali zaupanje državljanov in podporo evropskemu projektu;
Expresses its concerns regarding any initiatives to create new tools for enhanced coordination of economic policies between Euro member states out of the community framework; considers that the EU 2020 strategy and the current legislative proposals currently discussed on the economic governance should ensure better coordination in the framework of the Treaty; warns that attacks on labour regulations and collective bargaining will further erode citizens' faith and support to the European project;
Krovni cilji in upravljanje strategije Evropa 2020
Headline targets and governance of the EU 2020 strategy
8. meni, da sta letni pregled rasti in okvir evropskega semestra ključni orodji za okrepljeno usklajevanje gospodarskih politik; vseeno pa poudarja, da ne bi smela nadomestiti ali zmanjšati pomena obstoječih orodij, predvidenih s Pogodbo, zlasti širših smernic gospodarskih politik in smernic za zaposlovanje v državah članicah, ki predvidevajo močno udeležbo Parlamenta in pravno posvetovanje z njim; izraža močno zaskrbljenost zaradi težnje, da bi zmanjšali pomen letne razprave o teh orodjih, ter opozarja, da to resno spodkopava cilj povečanja lastne odgovornosti držav in demokratične odgovornosti;
Considers the annual growth survey and the framework of the European semester as crucial tools for an enhanced coordination of economic policies; however, stresses that they should not replace nor diminish the importance of the existing tools provided by the Treaty, in particular the broad economic policy guidelines and the guidelines for the employment of the Member States, where Parliament is respectively strongly involved and legally consulted; voices its strong concerns about the tendency to downgrade the yearly debate on these tools and warns that this severely undermines the Commission and Council's affirmed objective of increasing ownership and democratic accountability;
11. poziva k dolgoročni strategiji za naložbe, ki naj temelji na večji usklajenosti med evropskimi in nacionalnimi proračunskimi prizadevanji, zlasti v okviru procesa evropskega semestra; k večji vlogi Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj pri podpiranju naložb v infrastrukturo, zelene tehnologije, inovacije ter majhna in srednja podjetja, s katero bi zagotovili, da bodo politike teh dveh bank skladne s politikami EU ter da bosta za svoje ukrepe demokratično odgovorni Parlamentu; k ustreznemu evropskemu okviru za javno-zasebna partnerstva;
Calls for a long-term strategy for investment, based on more coordination between European and national budgetary efforts, notably in the framework of the European semester process; a stronger role for the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development in supporting investments in infrastructure, green technologies, innovation and SMEs, ensuring that the policies of the EIB and the EBRD are consistent with those of the EU and that their actions are democratically accountable to Parliament; an appropriate European framework for public-private partnerships;
15. potrjuje, da je poglabljanje enotnega trga postavljeno na prvo mesto v okviru strategije Evropa 2020 za premagovanje finančne in gospodarske krize, saj utira pot trajnostni rasti, zaposlovanju, socialni vključenosti in večji konkurenčnosti; se spominja ambicij akta o enotnem trgu, da bi s celostnim pristopom zagotovili boljše gospodarske rezultate in okrepili socialno razsežnost, hkrati pa ponovno vzpostavili zaupanje s tem, ko bi državljane postavili v samo središče enotnega trga; obžaluje, da letni pregled rasti nima podobnega pristopa glede enotnega trga;
Acknowledges that deepening the Single market is of paramount importance in framework of the EU 2020 strategy to overcome the financial and economic crisis, paving the way to sustainable growth, employment, social inclusion and enhanced competitiveness; recalls the ambition of the Single Market Act for a holistic approach to ensure better economic performance and a strengthened social dimension while restoring confidence by putting citizens at the heart of the Single market; regrets that the Annual Growth Survey does not take a similar approach concerning the Single market;
Vodilne pobude za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast
Flagship initiatives for smart , sustainable and inclusive growth
24. odobrava vodilno pobudo o Uniji inovacij kot ključnemu gonilu za doseganje ciljev strategije Evropa 2020; meni, da bi bilo treba ambicije te pobude podpreti z izdatnejšim financiranjem raziskav; poudarja, da je za večje projekte raziskav in razvoja, bistvene naložbe v energetsko infrastrukturo, nove pristojnosti EU na področju vesoljske politike in financiranje politike inovacij EU potrebna trdna, verodostojna in trajnostna finančna podpora EU; vseeno pa izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nejasne povezave med partnerstvi za inovacije in Evropskim inštitutom za inovacije in tehnologijo;
Welcomes the flagships initiative on ‘Innovation Union’ as a key driver to achieve EU 2020 objectives; Considers that the ambition of innovation Union should be supported by increased financing of research; Underlines that major R&D projects, key energy infrastructure investments, the new EU competence of space policy, and the financing of the EU innovation policy requires solid, credible and sustainable financial assistance of the EU; Expresses however its concerns on the lack of clarity of the link between the Innovation partnerships and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology ;
27. poudarja pomen ukrepov za promocijo in razvoj učinkovitosti virov ter trajnostno proizvodnjo in potrošnjo pri izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020 z vidika ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti; poudarja, da je treba vključiti učinkovito merjenje porabljenih virov in produktivnosti virov;
Underlines the importance of measure to promote and develop resource efficiency and sustainable production and consumption in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy with regard to biodiversity conservation; stresses the need to integrate effective measuring of resource used and resource productivity ;
30. poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši revizijo direktive o obdavčitvi energije, in sicer tako, da bi postale emisije CO2 in energijska vsebnost eno izmed glavnih meril za obdavčitev energetskih proizvodov; to bo omogočilo zagotavljanje večjih spodbud za prehod na brezogljične, trajnostne in obnovljive vire energije ter postopno preložitev davčnega bremena z dela na dejavnosti, ki onesnažujejo okolje, ustvarjajo znatne emisije toplogrednih plinov ali porabijo velike količine virov;
Calls the Commission to speed up the revision of the energy taxation directive in order to make CO2 emissions and energy content one of the basic criteria for the taxation of energy products, in order to provide major incentives to shift towards carbon-free and sustainable and renewable energy sources and gradually shift the tax burden from the labour sector on to activities which pollute the environment, create significant greenhouse gas emissions or use considerable amounts of resources;
32. ponovno poziva k agendi za raziskave in tehnologijo na področju prometa, kjer se je treba prednostno osredotočiti na zmanjšanje ogljika v prometu, povečanje preglednosti oskrbovalne verige in prometne varnosti, ter izboljšanje prometnega upravljanja;
Recalls its earlier call for a research and technology agenda for the transport sector in which priority should be given to decarbonise transport, increase the transparency of the supply chain and transport safety and security and improve traffic management;
36. opozarja, da sta strategija EU 2020 in kohezijska politika v osnovi povezani in da zaradi nujnega ustreznega financiranja vodilnih pobud ne bi smelo biti na razpolago manj sredstev za kohezijsko politiko; meni zlasti, da je za dolgoročno gospodarsko in družbeno blaginjo Evrope nujna močnejša kohezija;
Recalls that the EU 2020 strategy and cohesion policy are fundamentally linked and that the need to appropriately fund the flagship initiatives should not result in less resources for cohesion policy; Considers in particular, the greater cohesion is essential to Europe’s long-term economic and social well being;
40. meni, da mora naložbena politika EU v prihodnje spodbujati naložbe, ki so trajnostne, upoštevajo pravico vlad do sprejemanja zakonov, ki so v javnem interesu, ter spodbujajo kakovostne delovne pogoje v podjetjih, katerim so naložbe namenjene;
Considers that EU’s future investment policy must promote investments which are sustainable, respects the governments' right to regulate in favour of the public interest, and encourages good quality working conditions in the enterprises targeted by the investments;
PE459.638v01-00 B7‑0106/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Evropi 2020
PE459.638v01-00 B7‑0106/2011 European Parliament resolution on Europe 2020
– ob upoštevanju integriranih smernic Evropa 2020, ki jih je sprejel Svet leta 2010 (del I – Širše smernice ekonomskih politik, del II – Smernice za zaposlovanje),
– having regard to the Europe 2020 Integrated Guidelines as adopted by the Council in 2010 (Part I - BEPGs, Part II - Employment Guidelines),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 17. junija 2010 (strategija Evropa 2010), 16. decembra 2020 (gospodarsko upravljanje) in 4. februarja 2011 (energetska politika v okviru strategije Evropa 2020, inovacije),
– having regard to the Councils Conclusions of 17 June 2010 (Europe 2020 Strategy), of 16 December 2010 (Economic Governance) and of 4 February 2011 (Europe 2020 Energy Policy, Innovation),