natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker bi tem ljudem življenje v okolju, kjer bi bili preskrbljeni s svojimi vsakdanjimi predmeti, dalo več varnosti in jim zmanjšalo njihov občutek izključenosti in osamljenosti,
whereas living in an environment furnished with their own everyday belongings would make such persons more secure and reduce their sense of extraneousness and isolation,
poziva Komisijo, da v zvezi z 'Dnevom starejših' državam članicam predlaga, da opravijo raziskavo in zagotovijo financiranje projektov 'varovanih stanovanj', to je zgradb z namestitvijo, ki preprečujejo potrebo po hospitalizaciji starejših ljudi in jim omogoča življenje s svojimi osebnimi predmeti, ter da se tem zgradbam dodeli skupne storitve kot so zdravstvena oskrba, osebne storitve in kulturne dejavnosti, rekreacija in rehabilitacijske dejavnosti;
Calls on the Commission to propose to the Member States, in connection with the 'Day of the Elderly', that research be conducted and financing provided for projects for 'protected houses', which is to say buildings with accommodation that precludes the need for elderly people to be hospitalised and allows them to live surrounded by their personal belongings, and to call for these buildings to benefit from common services such as healthcare, personal services and cultural, recreational and rehabilitative activities;
o strategiji EU boja proti drogam (2005 - 2012)
on the draft EU drugs strategy (2005-2012)
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o strategiji EU boja proti drogam (2005 - 2012)
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the draft EU drugs strategy (2005-2012)
ob upoštevanju seje Sveta za sodstvo in notranje zadeve z dne 2. in 3. decembra 2004, na kateri se bo razpravljalo o predlogu strategije EU boja proti drogam za obdobje 2005 - 2012,
having regard to the meeting of the JHA Council of 2 and 3 December 2004, at which a draft EU drugs strategy for the period 2005-2012 is to be considered,
ob upoštevanju seje Evropskega sveta z dne 17. decembra 2004, na kateri bo predlog strategije EU boja proti drogam za obdobje 2005 -2012 sprejet,
having regard to the European Council of 17 December 2004, at which the draft EU drugs strategy for the period 2005-2012 is to be adopted,
ob upoštevanju člena 114(1) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 114(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker bodo okvir in prednostne naloge, ki jih določa nova strategija EU boja proti drogam, služili za temelj dvema zaporednima triletnima akcijskima načrtoma EU boja proti drogam (2005-2007 in 2009-2011), obema pa bo sledilo enoletno evalvacijsko obdobje (2008 in 2012),
whereas the framework and priorities laid down in the new EU drugs strategy are to serve as a basis for two consecutive three‑year EU action plans to combat drugs (2005-2007 and 2009-2011), each to be followed by a one-year period of evaluation (2008 and 2012),
ker je eden od temeljnih elementov politike na področju boja proti drogam v okviru EU izboljšanje sodelovanja med institucijami EU,
whereas an essential aspect of drugs policy within the EU consists in improving cooperation between EU institutions,
ker je treba to priložnost izkoristiti za spodbuditev in razvoj učinkovitih in globalnih politik boja proti drogam,
whereas it is important to seize this opportunity to encourage and develop effective, comprehensive policies to combat drugs,
naslovi naslednje priporočilo na Svet:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
a) naj uvede resnično evropsko politiko boja proti drogam, osredotočeno na zmanjšanje povpraševanja in ponudbe, kot tudi na obveščanje in evalvacijo;
a) establish a genuine European policy to combat drugs, focussed on reducing supply and demand, and on the provision of information and evaluation;
b) naj spodbudi in razvije politike zmanjšanja škode v državah članicah, ne da bi kateri od njih prepovedali sprejetje ukrepov ali uresničitev izkušenj na tem področju;
b) encourage and develop harm reduction policies in the Member States, without preventing individual Member States from adopting measures or conducting pilot schemes in this area;
c) naj strogo skrbi za spoštovanje klavzule proti drogam v mednarodnih sporazumih in naj v ta namen zahteva, da se ji prizna status "temeljne klavzule";
c) strictly verify compliance with the clause relating to combating drugs in international agreements and, to that effect, ask that 'essential clause' status be accorded;
d) naj poskrbi, da bo Komisija osnutka akcijskih načrtov boja proti drogam (2005-2007 in 2009-2011) pripravila v soglasju z Evropskim parlamentom, Evropskim centrom za spremljanje drog in odvisnosti (ECSDO) in Europolom ter ob posvetovanju z zadevnimi organizacijami civilne družbe;
d) see to it that the draft action plans to combat drugs (2005-2007 and 2009-2011) are drawn up by the Commission in cooperation with the European Parliament, the EMCDDA and Europol and in consultation with relevant civil society organisations;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu ter v vednost Evropskemu svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the European Council and the Commission.
ki ga predlaga Antoine Duquesne
by Antoine Duquesne
v imenu skupine ALDE/ADLE
on behalf of the ALDE/ADLE Group
o revidiranem Akcijskem načrtu/Delovnem programu EU o boju proti terorizmu
on the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o revidiranem Akcijskem načrtu/Delovnem programu EU o boju proti terorizmu
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme
ob upoštevanju Izjave o boju proti terorizmu, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju dne 24. in 25. marca 2004,
having regard to the Declaration on the fight against terrorism which was adopted at the European Council meeting of 24-25 March 2004,
ob upoštevanju revidiranega Akcijskega načrta/Delovnega programa EU o boju proti terorizmu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju dne 17. in 18. junija 2004,
having regard to the EU's revised anti-terrorism Action Plan which was adopted at the European Council meeting of 17-18 June 2004,
ob upoštevanju vrste ukrepov, ki jih vsebuje Akcijski načrt o boju proti terorizmu, ki ga bo Evropski svet obravnaval na zasedanju dne 17. decembra 2004,
having regard to the package of measures contained in the anti-terrorism Action Plan which is to be considered at the European Council meeting to be held on 17 December 2004,
ker je izboljšanje primernega sodelovanja med institucijami EU eden od ključnih elementov politike EU na področju boja proti terorizmu,
whereas improving fair cooperation between the EU institutions is one of the essential aspects of the EU's anti-terrorism policy,
ker je treba izkoristiti priložnost za pospeševanje in razvoj učinkovite vsestranske politike boja proti terorizmu,
whereas advantage must be taken of the opportunity to stimulate and develop effective, comprehensive anti-terrorism policies,
naslovi naslednja priporočila na Svet:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
a) da oblikuje primerno evropsko politiko boja proti terorizmu, ki bi se soočila z vsemi dejavniki, ki prispevajo k nastanku in razvoju terorizma tako v EU, kot drugje po svetu;
(a) that a proper EU anti-terrorism policy should be devised in order to combat all the factors which contribute to the emergence and development of terrorism, both within the EU and elsewhere in the world;
b) da zahteva od držav članic, naj vsestransko in učinkovito izvajajo ukrepe proti terorizmu, ki jih je sprejel Svet;
(b) that the Member States should be required to implement comprehensively and effectively the anti-terrorism measures adopted by the Council;
c) da čimprej odobri vse potrebne zakonodajne ukrepe za vzpostavitev vsestranskega globalnega okvira za boj proti terorizmu, vključno z ukrepi za zagotavljanje trdnega sodelovanja med varnostnimi silami in organi;
(c) that all the legislative measures needed in order to create a comprehensive, coherent anti-terrorism framework (which must include measures to facilitate seamless cooperation between security forces and bodies) should be adopted as soon as possible;
d) da uporabi klavzulo, predvideno za primer terorističnih napadov, iz člena 42 osnutka Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo in vključeno v Izjavo, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju dne 25. in 26. marca 2004;
(d) that the solidarity clause provided for in Article 42 of the draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and incorporated into the Declaration adopted at the 25-26 March 2004 European Council meeting should be implemented in the event of an assumed terrorist attack;
e) da odobri v letnih proračunih Evropske unije sredstva, potrebna za zagotavljanje pomoči in primernih odškodnin žrtvam terorizma;
(e) that the funding required to provide the victims of terrorism with adequate assistance and compensation should be entered in the EU's annual budgets;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu ter v vednost Komisiji in Evropskemu svetu.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission and the European Council.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0015/2004
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0015/2004
ki ga predlagajo Françoise Castex, Glenys Kinnock, Erika Mann, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez in Margrietus J. van den Berg
by Françoise Castex, Glenys Kinnock, Erika Mann, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez and Margrietus J. van den Berg
o sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z naslovom 'Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015'
on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee 'Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015' ( COM(2004) 461 )
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z naslovom 'Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015' ( KOM(2004) 461 )
European Parliament resolution on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee 'Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015' ( COM(2004) 461 )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o državah v razvoju, mednarodni trgovini in trajnostnemu razvoju: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015 ( KOM(2004) 461 ) UL C ... . ,
having regard to the Commission Communication on developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015 ( COM(2004) 461 ) OJ C ... . ,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2501/2001 z dne 10. decembra 2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 UL L 346, 31.12.2001, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2211/2003 z dne 15. decembra 2003, ki spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 2501/2001 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 in podaljšuje njeno veljavnost do 31. decembra 2005 UL L 332, 19.12.2003, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2211/2003 of 15 December 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 and extending it to 31 December 2005 OJ L 332, 19.12.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o shemi splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 UL C 153E, 27.6.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 OJ C 153E, 27.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. decembra 2003 o shemi splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2002 do 31. decembra 2004 in o podaljšanju njene veljavnosti do 31. decembra 2005 P5-TA(2003)0538. ,
having regard to its resolution of 4 December 2003 on a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 and extending it to 31 December 2005 P5-TA(2003)0538. ,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Krepitev kulture posvetovanja in dialoga - splošna načela in minimalni standardi za posvetovanje Komisije z zainteresiranimi strankami" ( KOM(2002) 704 ) UL C ... . ,
having regard to the Communication from the Commission 'Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue - General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission' ( COM(2002) 704 ) OJ C ... . ,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov svetovnega vrha o trajnostnem razvoju (WSSD) v Johannesburgu (Južna Afrika) od 26. avgusta do 4. septembra 2002,
having regard to the outcome of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) held in Johannesburg (South Africa) from 26 August to 4 September 2002,
ob upoštevanju Deklaracije tisočletja iz leta 2000 in zavezanosti ZN in njenih držav članic k doseganju Razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja do leta 2015;
having regard to the Millennium Declaration of 2000 and the commitment of the UN and its member countries to achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015,
ob upoštevanju člena 108(5) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 108(5) of the Rules of Procedure,
ker je bil splošni sistem preferencialov (GSP) vse od njegove uvedbe leta 1971 naprej ključno orodje razvojne politike EU kot tudi trgovinske politike ES,
whereas since its creation in 1971 the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) has been a key instrument of the EU's development policy as well as EC trade policy,
ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu določa nove desetletne smernice za splošni sistem preferencialov kot osnovo za serijo triletnih uredb,
whereas the Commission's Communication sets out new ten-year guidelines for the Generalised System of Preferences, on the basis of which a series of three-year regulations will subsequently ensue,
ker bo vsaka sprememba v sedanji shemi GSP neposredno, pozitivno in negativno, vplivala na veliko število zainteresiranih strani,
whereas any change in the current GSP scheme will directly affect, positively and negatively, a wide variety of stakeholders,
ker se je, kot je navedeno v sporočilu Komisije "Krepitev kulture posvetovanja in dialoga - splošna načela in minimalni standardi za posvetovanje Komisije z zainteresiranimi strankami" ( KOM(2002) 704 ), Evropska komisija zavezala k obsežnim in preglednim posvetovanjem s stranmi, na katere vpliva kakršna koli večja politična pobuda,
whereas, as stated in the Commission Communication 'Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue - General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission' ( COM(2002) 704 ), the Commission has committed itself to wide and transparent consultations with the actors affected by any major policy initiative,
ker je prizivno telo WTO v odločbi o shemi splošnega sistema preferencialov (GSP) ES z dne 7. aprila 2004 navedlo, da lahko razvite države določijo različne tarife za izdelke iz različnih držav upravičenk do GSP, če so te diferencialne tarife v skladu z ostalimi določbami klavzule o upravičenosti in tako ne zapostavljajo držav z enakimi razvojnimi, finančnimi in trgovskimi potrebami, katerim so ugodnosti namenjene,
whereas the WTO India Appellate Body, in the ruling on the EC's Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) scheme on 7 April 2004, stated that developed countries may grant different tariffs to products originating from different GSP beneficiaries, provided that such differential tariff treatment meets the remaining conditions in the Enabling Clause and thus ensures non-discrimination against countries with the same development, financial and trade needs which the benefits are intended to address,
pozdravlja cilje iz sporočila in podpira odločnost Komisije, da izboljša sedanji splošni sistem preferencialov s poenostavljenimi, stabilnejšimi in jasnejšimi določbami, z osredotočanjem preferencialov na tiste države v razvoju, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, in z dodatnim poudarkom na trajnostnem razvoju;
Welcomes the objectives set out by the Communication and endorses the Commission's resolve to improve the current Generalised System of Preferences through the simplification, stabilisation and clarification of the arrangements, the concentration of preferences on those developing countries most in need, and the enhancement of the sustainable development component;
ugotavlja, da Komisija za dosego teh ciljev predlaga daljnosežne reforme sedanjega sistema GSP, med drugim zmanjšanje števila določb s petih na tri, nov ocenjevalni sistem, osnovan samo na merilih tržnega deleža, ter poenostavitev pravil o izvoru;
Notes that, in order to achieve its declared objectives, the Commission proposes far-reaching reforms of the current GSP system, such as, amongst others, reduction of the arrangements from five to three, a new graduation system based only on market share criteria and the simplification of rules of origin;
ugotavlja, da se to pomembno sporočilo, ki določa nove desetletne smernice za GSP, ne nanaša na nobeno prejšnjo temeljito oceno delovanja in vplivov sedanjega GSP kot sredstva, s katerim bi oblikovalci politike pridobili zanesljive informacije tako o potrebnosti reform kot o možnostih za izboljšanje;
Notes that this important Communication, which sets out new ten-year guidelines for the GSP, does not refer to any prior thorough evaluation of the functioning and impact of the current GSP as a means to provide decision-makers with solid elements of information on both the need for reform and the potential for improvement;
obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije ni rezultat ustreznega posvetovanja zainteresiranih strani in da prihaja prepozno za kakršna koli konkretna posvetovanja v pričakovanju objave predloga za naslednjo uredbo;
Regrets that the Commission’s communication was not the result of a proper stakeholder consultation and does not come sufficiently in advance to allow for meaningful consultations in anticipation of the expected release of the proposal for the next regulation;
opozarja, da carine še nikoli niso bile tako nizke in da bi morala biti nadaljnja zniževanja tarif predmet sporazuma na pogajanjih WTO o razvojni agendi iz Dohe, ter ugotavlja, da bi se moral s posledično odpravo preferencialov ukvarjati novi sistem GSP;
Recalls that customs duties have steadily fallen to an all-time low and that further tariff reductions should be agreed upon as a result of WTO negotiations on the Doha Development Agenda, and considers that the subsequent erosion of preferences must be addressed by the new GSP system;
poudarja, da bi morala zaradi izboljšanja učinkov na posebne potrebe držav v razvoju naslednja uredba o GSP:
Stresses that, in order to improve its impact on the special needs of developing countries, the next GSP Regulation should:
a) dodeljevati preferenciale v skladu z izvoznim potencialom primernih držav v razvoju;
a) grant preferences in accordance with the export potential of eligible developing countries;
b) razširiti veljavnost preferencialov na nove izdelke, precejšnje število izdelkov, trenutno opredeljenih s kategorijo 'občutljivo', pa prekvalificirati v kategorijo 'normalno';
b) extend preferential access to a wide range of new products and transfer a significant number of products currently classified as 'sensitive' to the 'non-sensitive' category;
c) upoštevati pomembnost suverenosti hrane in pravice vsake države, da pri izvajanju GSP zaščiti svoje kmetijstvo;
c) consider the importance of food sovereignty and the right of each country to protect its agriculture in the implementation of GSP;
d) d) zagotoviti, da izvajanje novega ocenjevalnega sistema ne bo negativno vplivalo na nobeno državo v razvoju;
d) ensure that the new graduation system applied does not impact negatively on any developing country;
e) e) zagotoviti, da se 'GSP Plus' uporabi za vse države v razvoju, ki ne izpolnjujejo meril za EBA;
e) ensure that 'GSP Plus' is applied to all developing countries which do not qualify for EBA;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost razširitve preferencialov za kategorijo "občutljivo";
Calls on the Commission to explore the possibility of increasing the preferential margin for sensitive products;
pozdravlja splošno težnjo po poenostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma, vendar z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da novi ocenjevalni sistem, kot ga je zastavila Komisija, temelji samo na merilih tržnega deleža, ne upošteva pa kazalcev razvoja in revščine, ter verjame, da bi takšen sistem lahko zapostavljal velike, toda revne izvoznike;
Welcomes the overall objective of simplifying the graduation mechanism but notes with concern that the new graduation system outlined by the Commission is based solely on market share criteria, disregarding development and poverty indicators, and believes that such a system could discriminate against big yet poor exporters;
poudarja potrebo po natančni oceni dobrih in slabih plati novega ocenjevalnega sistema in po mehanizmu za ublažitev škodljivih vplivov, ki bi jih lahko ocenjevanje povzročilo revnemu delu prebivalstva v državah v razvoju;
Stresses the need to carefully evaluate the pros and cons of the new graduation system and to foresee a mechanism that mitigates the adverse effects that graduation may impose on poor layers of population in developing countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj še pred objavo naslednje uredbe o GSP priskrbi več informacij o vplivu različnih ocenjevalnih pragov na sedanje države upravičenke do GSP;
Calls on the Commission to provide more information about the impact that different graduation thresholds would have on current GSP beneficiaries well in advance of the release of the next GSP Regulation;
podpira spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja kot ključnega dela GSP, vendar opozarja na osnovni pogoj, da mora biti predlagani enotni sistem dodatnih koncesij (GSP plus) preprost in predvidljiv ter združljiv s klavzulo WTO o upravičenosti, tako da vključuje objektivna merila za izbor in ocenjevanje držav upravičenk;
Endorses the promotion of sustainable development as a key component of the GSP but draws attention to the fundamental requirement that the proposed single system of additional concessions (GSP plus) be a simple and predictable arrangement that is compatible with the WTO Enabling Clause and thus provides for objective criteria for the selection and evaluation of beneficiary countries;
vztraja, da morajo države upravičenke za izpolnitev sprejemnih meril za 'GSP Plus' nujno tako ratificirati kot izvajati ustrezne mednarodne konvencije, in da mora bodoča uredba določiti zanesljive ocenjevalne postopke za preverjanje dosežkov teh držav, ki bodo za primere nezadostnega izvajanja določali možnost začetka preiskave;
Insists that it is crucial that, to qualify for 'GSP Plus', beneficiary countries must have both ratified and implemented the relevant international conventions, and that the forthcoming Regulation must specify credible procedures by which this can be assessed, and by which investigations can be initiated in case of evidence of inadequate implementation;
verjame, da se je potrebno o vsaki prijavi države za obravnavo v okviru 'GSP Plus' posvetovati z Evropskim parlamentom in s socialnimi partnerji;
Believes that the European Parliament and the social partners should be consulted on any request for 'GSP Plus' benefits;