natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so najrevnejše regije EU tiste, ki spadajo v okvir konvergenčnega cilja kohezijske politike in katerih BDP na prebivalca je nižji od 75 % povprečja BDP na prebivalca v celotni Uniji,
whereas the poorest EU regions are regions coming under the cohesion policy convergence objective whose per capita GDP is less than 75% of average per capita GDP for the EU as a whole,
ker pojem kohezije ni bil jasno opredeljen in zajema različne dejavnosti, ki pospešujejo usklajen gospodarski, socialni in teritorialni razvoj v regijah EU,
whereas the concept of cohesion has not been clearly defined and covers various activities fostering harmonious economic, social and territorial development in the EU regions,
ker je v sklepih njegove resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007 o posledicah prihodnjih širitev za učinkovitost kohezijske politike Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0130 .
whereas the conclusions of its resolution of 24 April 2007 on the consequences of future enlargements on the effectiveness of cohesion policy Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0130 .
navedeno, da je treba sedanjo strukturo financiranja kohezijske politike ponovno pregledati zaradi novih širitev; poleg tega predlagajo, da se mora financiranje regionalne konkurenčnosti in teritorialnega sodelovanja bolj osredotočati na vključevanje regionalnih gospodarstev in infrastrukture evropskega pomena ter na pomoč regijam, da se bodo lahko soočale z izzivi globalizacije in demografskimi spremembami;
mention that the present structure of cohesion policy financing is to be reviewed in view of future enlargements; whereas they also propose that the financing of regional competitiveness and territorial cooperation has to be more focused on the integration of regional economies and infrastructure of European importance and on helping regions to cope with globalisation and demographic change,
ker je eno izmed temeljnih načel EU solidarnost, ki omogoča zmanjševanje neenakosti pri regionalnem razvoju Unije;
whereas one of the fundamental principle of the EU is the principle of solidarity, which serves to reduce disparities in the Union's regional development,
ker je dosedanja kohezijska politika EU učinkovito prispevala k razvoju številnih regij v nekdanjih kohezijskih državah (Irska, Grčija, Portugalska in Španija), čeprav so nekatere še vedno precej nerazvite, njen vpliv v smislu konvergence najrevnejših regij pa je pripomogel k povečanju blaginje v celotni EU,
whereas, to date, EU cohesion policy has made an effective contribution to the development of many regions of the former cohesion countries (Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain), even though some regions are still significantly underdeveloped and whereas its impact in terms of the convergence of the poorest regions has helped to increase the prosperity of the EU as a whole,
ker je cilj kohezijske politike ta, da države članice in regije postanejo uspešna gospodarstva in s tem neodvisne od zunanje pomoči, čeprav prejem sredstev iz strukturnih skladov ni časovno omejen,
whereas the aim of cohesion policy is to render Member States and regions economically viable and thus independent from external aid, although the receipt of Structural Funds is not subject to time limitations,
ker ni dovolj podrobnih podatkov in primerjalnih študij z razvrstitvijo napredka regij, ki prejemajo sredstva iz strukturnih skladov,
whereas there is a lack of detailed information and comparative studies with rankings on the advancement of regions that profit from Structural Funds,
ker je število prebivalcev EU po njeni razširitvi na 27 držav članic naraslo na skoraj 493 milijonov 492 852 386.
whereas, after enlargement to 27 Member States, the EU now has a population that has risen to nearly 493 million 492 852 386.
Vir: Eurostat/Urad za cenzus ZDA.
Source: Eurostat/US Census Bureau.
, pri čemer jih okoli 30 % Vir: Eurostat, Statistika v središču – ekonomija in finance 17/2006.
, approximately 30% Source: Eurostat, Statistics in Focus – Economy and Finance 17/2006.
živi v sedanjih sto regijah s konvergenčnim ciljem, in ker so razlike v BDP med regijami v EU-27 sedaj veliko večje, kot so bile v EU-15, s povprečnim BDP na prebivalca od 24 % (jugovzhodna Romunija) do 303 % (ožji predel mesta London) povprečnega BDP EU,
of whom live in the current 100 convergence objective regions, and whereas the disparities between regions in GDP terms in EU-27 are currently significantly larger than they were in EU-15, with average per capita GDP ranging from 24% (south-eastern Romania) to 303% (Inner London) of average EU GDP,
ker so v EU-27 najrevnejše regije s konvergenčnim ciljem zlasti tiste v novih državah članicah, ki so kohezijsko politiko šele začele izvajati, zato ni mogoče oceniti njene učinkovitosti pri zmanjševanju neenakosti,
whereas in EU-27 the poorest convergence objective regions are located principally in the new Member States, where the implementation of cohesion policy only recently began, and thus it is impossible to evaluate its success in reducing disparities,
ker je v najrevnejših državah članicah gospodarska rast neenakomerna in je skoncentrirana okoli mestnih območij, velik delež prebivalstva teh držav pa živi na podeželju,
whereas in the poorest Member States economic growth is unevenly distributed and tends to be concentrated around urban areas, while in these countries a substantial part of the population lives in rural areas,
ker v regijah, ki so gospodarsko revne zaradi pomanjkanja osnovne infrastrukture, omejenega dostopa do javnih storitev in visoke brezposelnosti, število prebivalcev upada hitreje kot v drugih regijah, kar ogroža njihovo zmožnost za zagotavljanje resničnega razvoja,
whereas regions suffering from economic poverty resulting from a lack of basic infrastructure, restricted access to public services and high unemployment are becoming depopulated at a faster rate than other regions and whereas this, in turn, undermines their ability to secure genuine development,
ker člen 299(2) Pogodbe ES določa, da mora Skupnost svojo politiko prilagoditi ter sprejeti posebne in specifične ukrepe za najbolj oddaljene regije, pri čemer mora upoštevati poseben položaj teh regij, med katerimi večina spada med najrevnejše regije EU zaradi kombiniranih ter trajnih posledic strukturnih in geografskih pomanjkljivosti, ki močno ovirajo njihov razvoj,
whereas Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty requires the Community to adjust its policies and to apply special and specific measures to the outermost regions, given the specific situation of these regions, most of which are among the poorest regions of the EU, a factor which severely handicaps their development because of the combined and lasting effects of structural and geographic disadvantages,
ker je bila v sklopu kohezijske politike uporaba sredstev v najrevnejših regijah nekaterih novih držav članic v obdobju 2004–2006 nizka,
whereas in some of the new Member States the uptake of funding in the poorest regions coming under cohesion policy was low during the period 2004 to 2006,
ker je za uspešno izvajanje financiranja iz strukturnih skladov, kakršno mora biti, da bi najrevnejšim regijam zagotovili znatno gospodarsko rast, ki bi jim omogočila, da postopoma ujamejo razvitejše regije glede na BDP na prebivalca, potrebno tesno sodelovanje med organi na lokalni, regionalni in nacionalni ravni ter na ravni Skupnosti,
whereas, if structural funding is to be successfully implemented, which it must be in order to ensure substantial economic growth for the poorest regions such as will enable them gradually to catch up with the more developed regions in terms of per capita GDP, close coordination is required between authorities at local, regional, national and Community levels,
ker odobritev financiranja sama po sebi še ne zagotavlja, da bodo sredstva dobro uporabljena, in ker organi v revnih regijah pogosto nimajo ustreznega znanja in izkušenj ter osnovnih primernih sredstev, da bi lahko v celoti izkoristili kohezijska sredstva, do katerih so upravičeni,
whereas the fact that funding has been granted does not guarantee per se that it will be put to good use, and whereas authorities in poor regions often lack the appropriate skills and experience and the essential matching funds to be able to make full use of the cohesion funding to which they are entitled,
ker obstaja vrsta razlogov za gospodarsko zaostalost posameznih regij in ker v najrevnejših regijah EU primanjkuje predvsem osnovne infrastrukture, ki je bistvena za uravnotežen trajnostni razvoj in dodatne naložbe, ter ustreznih človeških virov in pobud na področju izobraževanja, vseživljenjskega učenja in inovacij,
whereas there are a number of reasons for the economic backwardness of individual regions and whereas the poorest EU regions above all lack the basic infrastructure that is essential for balanced sustainable development and further investment, as well as adequate human resources and adequate incentives for education, lifelong learning and innovation,
ker so zasebni lastniški kapital, tvegani kapital, menjavajoči se skladi in mikroposojila za novoustanovljena podjetja, ključna gonilna sila za podjetništvo, inovacije in ustvarjanje delovnih mest;
whereas private equity, venture capital, rotating funds and micro-credits for start-ups play an essential role as a driving force for entrepreneurship, innovation and job creation,
ker socialna izključenost in izredno visoka raven dolgotrajne brezposelnosti prevladujeta predvsem v revnejših regijah, zlasti med ženskami, starejšimi in invalidnimi osebami ter ranljivimi etničnimi skupinami,
whereas social exclusion and extremely high long-term unemployment rates are particularly prevalent in the poorest regions, especially among women and the elderly, disabled persons and vulnerable ethnic groups,
ker temeljne pravice državljanov zajemajo enak dostop moških in žensk do vseh javnih storitev, enake možnosti na trgu dela in enak dostop do izobraževanja, kulture ter zdravstvenih in socialnih storitev,
whereas fundamental citizens' rights include equal access for men and women to all utilities, equal opportunities on the labour market and equal access to education, culture and health and social services,
poziva k odločnemu ukrepanju za zmanjšanje največjih razvojnih pomanjkljivosti v najrevnejših regijah EU in zlasti ugotavlja, da nove države članice, v katerih se od leta 2004 izvaja kohezijska politika, potrebujejo posebno podporo zaradi stalnih institucionalnih, upravnih in gospodarskih težav;
Urges that resolute action be taken to reduce the most acute development shortfalls in the poorest EU regions, and notes in particular that the new Member States, which have come under cohesion policy since 2004, require special support owing to their ongoing institutional, administrative and economic difficulties;
poudarja, da je treba v kohezijskih državah EU-15 preučiti zgodovinski razvoj; poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z zadevnimi državami članicami, njihovimi regijami, lokalnimi organi in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi jasno poudari ukrepe, ki so v uspešnih regijah (na primer na Irskem) omogočili razvoj, in glavne ovire v regijah, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, da do njih ne pride tudi v regijah novih držav članic;
Stresses the importance of analysing historical developments in the cohesion countries of EU-15; calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States concerned, their regions, local authorities and other interested parties, to clearly highlight on one hand growth generating measures in successful regions (such as Ireland) and on the other hand the main obstacles in the regions lagging behind, so that the impediments do not arise again in the regions of the new Member States;
meni, da so težave s financiranjem velika in nujna skrb, zlasti za nove države članice, ki težko izpolnjujejo zapletene zahteve kohezijske politike in pogosto nimajo dovolj lastnega (zasebnega ali javnega) kapitala za predfinanciranje subvencij Skupnosti glede na postopkovne težave in časovne omejitve pri izvajanju projektov, zaradi česar možni upravičenci ne morejo pridobiti ali zahtevati sredstev, ki bi jih lahko koristno uporabili;
Takes the view that funding uptake difficulties are a major and pressing concern, particularly for the new Member States, which are finding it difficult to satisfy complicated cohesion policy requirements and often lack sufficient own contribution (private or public) capital to pre-finance Community grants, because of the procedural difficulties and time restrictions involved in implementing projects, as a result of which potential beneficiaries are unable to obtain or even claim funds which they could put to good use;
izraža zaskrbljenost, da je pomoč Skupnosti v nekaterih regijah slabo usmerjena, zaradi česar se položaj v njih kljub večletnem financiranju ne izboljšuje in se neprimerno zapravlja sredstva Skupnosti;
Is concerned that in some regions Community assistance is poorly targeted, with the result that the situation in those regions fails to improve despite many years of funding and that Community resources are squandered;
predlaga, naj se v kohezijski politiki EU upošteva raznolikost potreb najrevnejših regij, pri čemer se pomoč prilagodi njihovim posebnim značilnostim in pogojem ter se izkoristi njihov potencial, da bi se lahko izvajali projekti, ki ustvarjajo trajne rezultate in resničen razvoj na podlagi večletnih razvojnih načrtov, ki ustrezno upoštevajo načrte za prostorski razvoj in druge politike Skupnosti;
Suggests that EU cohesion policy should take due account of the diversity of the needs of the poorest regions, with aid being tailored to their specific features and conditions and their potential being exploited, so as to implement projects that produce lasting results and genuine development on the basis of multiannual development plans taking due account of spatial development plans and of other Community policies;
priporoča, naj se kohezijsko politiko EU prilagodi potrebam najbolj oddaljenih regij, kot so navedene v členu 299(2) prek posebnih in specifičnih ukrepov; podpira strategijo EU za pomoč njenim najbolj oddaljenim regijam in Komisijo poziva, naj hitro predloži podrobne podatke o vsebini napovedanega "tesnejšega sodelovanja", zlasti v zvezi z izboljšanjem konkurenčnosti najbolj oddaljenih regij in akcijskim načrtom za širšo sosesko;
Recommends that EU cohesion policy be adapted to the outermost regions, as referred to in Article 299(2) through special, specific measures; supports the strategy deployed by the EU to help its outermost regions, and calls on the Commission rapidly to give details of the substance of the "stronger partnership" that it has announced, particularly with regard to improving the competitiveness of the outermost regions and its action plan for the wider neighbourhood;
priporoča, naj regije in države članice za pospešitev gospodarske rasti, dodatne naložbe in zagotovitev uravnoteženega trajnostnega razvoja v najrevnejših regijah dajo prednost projektom, s pomočjo katerih bi te regije postale dostopnejše z zagotovljeno osnovno infrastrukturo, zlasti na področju prometa, informacijske tehnologije in telekomunikacij, pri čemer je treba upoštevati socialni in okoljski vpliv takih projektov;
Recommends that, with a view to speeding up economic growth, further investment and balanced sustainable development in the poorest regions, regions and Member States give priority to projects designed to make regions more accessible by providing them with basic infrastructure, particularly in the transport and ITC fields, having due regard for the social and environmental impact of such projects;
poziva države članice ter regionalne in lokalne organe, naj pri načrtovanju prihodnjih regionalnih razvojnih programov upoštevajo potrebo po uravnoteženem razvoju v posameznih regijah; meni, da je zlasti pomembno upoštevati posebne potrebe mestnih območij z ustrezno urbanistično politiko, vključno s stanovanjsko politiko za "revne predele", in izvajati ustrezno podeželsko politiko;
Calls on the Member States and regional and local authorities to take due account of the need for balanced development within individual regions when planning future regional development programmes; believes it particularly important for account to be taken of the specific needs of urban areas, with an appropriate urban policy including a housing policy for 'poor neighbourhoods', and for an appropriate rural policy to be pursued;
meni, da je zlasti pomembno dodeliti mestom več pristojnosti na področju kohezijske politike, da se bodo lahko skupaj odzvala na posebne potrebe mestnih območij; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v celoti izrabijo možnosti programov celostnega razvoja, kjer je mogoče kohezijsko politiko neposredno povezati z mestnim načrtovanjem;
Believes it is particularly important to attribute more competences in cohesion policy to cities so that they can react in partnership to the specific needs of urban areas; in this context calls on the Commission and Member States to fully exploit the potential of integrated development plans where cohesion policy can directly be linked with town planning;
pozdravlja osredotočanje na kohezijsko politiko za krepitev inovacijske zmogljivosti Skupnosti v obdobju 2007–2013; ugotavlja, da mora ta cilj veljati tudi za najrevnejše regije; zlasti poudarja, da je treba odpraviti razlike v tehnološkem razvoju v posameznih regijah, med regijami in v državah članicah s podpiranjem omrežij za tehnološko sodelovanje;
Welcomes the focus on using cohesion policy to enhance the Community's innovation capacity over the period 2007 to 2013; notes that this objective should also apply to the poorest regions; places particular emphasis on the need to reduce the technology gap within and between regions and Member States by bolstering technological cooperation networks;
Komisijo in države članice opominja, da je treba na podlagi vseh ocen kohezijske politike zagotoviti boljšo inovativno kohezijsko politiko v prihodnji razširjeni Uniji; opozarja, da se je treba osredotočiti na nove pojme teritorialnega razvoja in konkretnejše zamisli za podpiranje razvoja regionalne kritične mase okoli mestnih območij ali drugih regionalnih grozdov; opozarja tudi na to, da je treba pri uporabi strukturnih skladov uporabiti pristope, ki se bodo razlikovali glede na potrebe vseh regij;
Reminds the Commission and the Member States that any assessment of cohesion policy should lead to improved, innovative cohesion policy in any enlarged Union of the future; recalls the need to focus on new concepts of territorial development and more specific ideas for supporting the development of regional critical mass surrounding urban areas and other regional clusters; also recalls the need to use a differentiated approach to the use of Structural Funds specific to the needs of all regions;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj podprejo projekte, ki krepijo regionalno zmogljivost za ustvarjanje in prevzem nove tehnologije, zlasti tiste, ki je povezana z varstvom okolja in razvojem naravnih virov ter zajema razširjanje modelov, ki temeljijo na manjši porabi energije in uporabi obnovljivih virov energije, kar bo tem regijam omogočilo doseg vodilnega položaja na področju ekoinovacij, ne da bi pri tem utrpele negativne posledice netrajnostnega razvoja, kot so jih v procesu razvoja utrpele druge regije;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to support projects that increase regional capacity to generate and absorb new technologies, particularly those relating to environmental protection and the development of natural resources and involving the dissemination of models based on lower energy consumption and the use of renewable energies, so that the regions can develop a lead in eco-innovation without having to endure negative non-sustainable development aspects experienced by other regions in their development cycle;
poudarja, da je na področju kohezijske politike za spodbujanje uravnoteženega razvoja pomembno teritorialno sodelovanje (čezmejno, nadnacionalno in medregionalno); v zvezi s tem spodbuja vzpostavitev mrež regionalnega in medsektorskega sodelovanja, v katere bodo vključene predvsem najrevnejše regije;
Stresses the importance of territorial cooperation (cross-border, transnational and interregional) in the context of the EU's cohesion policy in order to promote balanced development; encourages in this regard the setting up of regional and sectoral cooperation networks, involving, especially the poorest regions;
poziva Komisijo, države članice in lokalne organe, naj v najrevnejših regijah spodbujajo podjetništvo z integriranim sistemom gospodarskih in socialnih spodbud za vlagatelje, pri tem pa opozarja, da je treba upravne postopke precej poenostaviti, zlasti kar zadeva vzpostavitev novih in razširitev obstoječih gospodarskih dejavnosti;
Encourages the Commission, Member States and local authorities to promote entrepreneurship in the poorest regions by means of an integrated system of economic and social incentives for investors, and draws attention to the need for significant simplification of administrative procedures, particularly in relation to the setting up of new, and expansion of existing, economic activities;
spodbuja države članice, naj podpirajo podjetništvo v šolah in programe usposabljanja za bodoče podjetnike, ki so namenjeni predvsem mladim, ženskam, starejšim osebam in manjšinam, izpostavljenim socialni izključenosti;
Encourages the Member States to promote entrepreneurship in schools and to support training schemes for future entrepreneurs, aimed in particular at young people, women, elderly persons and minorities exposed to social exclusion;
pozdravlja sprejem novih instrumentov, kot sta pobudi Skupna evropska sredstva za mikro, mala in srednje velika podjetja (JEREMIE) in Skupna evropska podpora za trajnostne naložbe v mestna območja (JESSICA); vendar opozarja, da sta se omenjena instrumenta v celoti začela izvajati pozno in da je ozaveščenost o možnosti, ki jih ponujata na lokalni in regionalni ravni, še vedno nizka; ugotavlja vse večje potrebo po tem, da se taki instrumenti objavijo in uporabljajo v čim širšem obsegu v državah članicah ter uporabljajo v skladu z dejanskimi razmerami v teh državah, pri čemer je treba upoštevati resnične potrebe morebitnih upravičencev in njihovo zmožnost, da te instrumente uporabijo v praksi;
Welcomes new instruments such as the Joint European Resources for Micro to Medium Enterprises (JEREMIE) and Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas (JESSICA) initiatives; nevertheless points to the fact that these instruments came late to be fully utilised and that awareness of the possibilities they offer at local and regional level is still very low; notes the pressing need for such instruments to be publicised and applied as widely as possible in the Member States, and applied in accordance with the actual situation in those States, with account being taken of the real needs of the potential beneficiaries and their capacity in practical terms to make use of these instruments;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja za zagotovitev tehnične pomoči državam članicam in regijam z vzpostavitvijo primernega programa za usposabljanje; pozdravlja pobudo za skupno pomoč pri podpori projektov v evropskih regijah (JASPERS), ki zagotavlja pomoč pri izvajanju velikih projektov;
Calls on the Commission to step up efforts to provide technical assistance to Member States and regions by setting up an appropriate training programme; welcomes the Joint Assistance in Supporting Projects in European Regions (JASPERS) initiative to provide assistance in implementing large projects;