natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
63. ugotavlja, da bi morala imeti EU dejavno vlogo pri prenovi mednarodnega monetarnega in finančnega sistema z močnim zunanjim predstavništvom, ki bi temeljilo na učinkovitejšem in bolj preglednem notranjem procesu odločanja v skladu z ustreznimi določbami Lizbonske pogodbe,
States that the EU should play an active role in reshaping the international monetary and financial system via more powerful external representation based on more efficient and transparent internal decision-making in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Lisbon Treaty;
67. poudarja, da bi lahko proizvodnjo svetovnih javnih dobrin, kot sta zaščita podnebja in izpolnjevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, podprli z okvirom EU za upravičen dostop do trga;
Underlines the fact that the production of global public goods such as climate protection and the fulfilment of the Millennium Development Goals could be favoured by an EU qualified market access framework;
70. opozarja, da bi moralo imeti euroobmočje v skladu s členom 138 Lizbonske pogodbe enotno zunanje predstavništvo; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v ta namen predstavi zakonodajni predlog;
Recalls that, under Article 138 of the Lisbon Treaty, the euro area is supposed to introduce unified external representation; urges the Commission to put forward a legislative proposal to that effect;
Pripravljavec mnenja: Yannick Jadot
Rapporteur: Yannick Jadot
2. je zaskrbljen zaradi trajne dinamike naraščanja neravnovesij na svetovni ravni, kar kažejo vedno višji primanjkljaji na tekočih računih EU in ZDA v letu 2010;
Is concerned about the persistence of dynamics of increasing imbalances at the global level, as shown by the rising current account deficits of the EU and the US throughout the year 2010;
7. poudarja, da bi lahko proizvodnjo svetovnih javnih dobrin, kot sta zaščita podnebja in izpolnjevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, podprli z okvirom EU za upravičen dostop do trga;
Underlines the fact that the production of global public goods such as climate protection and the fulfilment of the Millennium Development Goals could be favoured by an EU qualified market access framework;
10. je posebej zaskrbljen, ker je treba omejiti nestanovitnost cen hrane; poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu predstavi neodvisno oceno učinka o izzivih, ki jih ta trend postavlja tako pred potrošnike kot pred proizvajalce, predlaga ukrepe za izboljšanje dobavne verige in skladiščnih objektov, s katerimi bi preprečili izgube med proizvodnjo in prevozom na trg, ter preuči učinek nizkih obrestnih mer na blagovne borze; poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje poseben odbor EU za blagovne terminske posle po vzoru ZDA, oblikuje strožjo pravno ureditev za blagovno trgovino ter svetovne standarde za obračun in poravnavo, vključno s pristojnostjo določanja posameznih in skupnih pozicijskih limitov za vse blagovne terminske menjave;
Is particularly concerned about the need to curb food price volatility; urges the Commission to present the European Parliament with an independent impact assessment on the challenges posed to both consumers and producers by this trend and to suggest measures to improve supply chain and storage facilities to avoid waste during production and transportation to markets and look into the impact of low interest rates on commodity markets; calls on the Commission to design a specific EU Commodity Futures Trading Committee, following the US model, to draw up stricter regulations on commodities trading and global standards for clearing contracts, including a competence to set individual and aggregated position limits on all commodity futures exchanges;
12. poziva EU, naj uresničuje izjave vrhunskih srečanj skupine G8/G20, predvsem kar zadeva subvencije za fosilna goriva in kmetijstvo, upoštevaje smernice OECD na tem področju ter nestanovitnost cen hrane in blagovne borze;
Calls on the EU to implement declarations by the G8/G20 summits, in particular with regard to subsidies for fossil fuels and agriculture, taking into account the OECD guidelines in this domain, and to food price volatility and commodities markets;
14. opozarja, da morajo vsi sedanji trgovinski sporazumi EU vključevati jasne zahteve glede trajnosti; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da mora gospodarsko upravljanje služiti socialnemu in okoljskemu napredku ter ne sme biti omejeno zgolj na denarna merila;
Recalls that all current EU trade agreements need to include a strong sustainability chapter; emphasises, in this context, that economic governance needs to serve social and environmental advancement and must not be limited to purely monetary criteria;
William (grof) Dartmouthski (William (The Earl of) Dartmouth), Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Kader Arif, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Christofer Fjellner, Metin Kazak, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Cristiana Muscardini, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Keith Taylor, Paweł Zalewski
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Kader Arif, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Christofer Fjellner, Metin Kazak, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Cristiana Muscardini, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Keith Taylor, Paweł Zalewski
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Syed Kamall, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Hans-Peter Martin, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Alfredo Pallone, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Syed Kamall, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Hans-Peter Martin, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Alfredo Pallone, Anni Podimata, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells, Corien Wortmann-Kool
MNENJE ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE..................................12
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............13
o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah
on the Mutual Evaluation Process of the Services Directive
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Boljšemu delovanju enotnega trga za storitve naproti – uporaba rezultatov postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah“ ( KOM(2011)0020 ) in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEC(2011)0102 ), priloženega temu sporočilu, o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah,
– having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘Towards a better functioning Single Market for services – building on the results of the mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive’ ( COM(2011)0020 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ‘On the process of mutual evaluation of the Services Directive’ ( SEC(2011)0102 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 10. marca 2011 o boljšem delovanju enotnega trga za storitve – postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah,
– having regard to the Council Conclusions of 10 March 2011 on a better functioning Single Market for services – mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive,
UL L 376, 27.12.2006, str.
OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p.36. ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu
– having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0144 . ,
Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0144 . ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 15. februarja 2011 o izvajanju Direktive o storitvah 2006/123/ES
– having regard to its resolution of 15 February 2011 on implementation of the Services Directive 2006/123/EC
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0051 . ,
Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0051 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenje Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7-0324/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs( A7-0324/2011 ),
A. ker storitve še vedno obsegajo zgolj približno petino skupne trgovine znotraj EU, hkrati pa ustvarjajo več kot dve tretjini BDP in zaposlitev,
A. whereas services still represent only around one-fifth of total intra-EU trade while accounting for over two thirds of the EU GDP and employment,
B. ker dejavnosti, ki jih zajema direktiva o storitvah, ustvarjajo 40 % BDP in delovnih mest v EU in ker predstavljajo tudi nekatere najpomembnejše neizkoriščene možnosti za gospodarsko rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v EU, saj na notranjem trgu še vedno obstaja veliko ovir za trgovino s storitvami,
B. whereas activities covered by the Services Directive account for 40% of EU GDP and jobs, but whereas these activities also represent some of the most important untapped potential for economic growth and job creation in the EU, since many obstacles to trade in services still exist in the Internal Market,
C. ker storitve spodbujajo gospodarstva držav članic z ustvarjanjem delovnih mest, rastjo in inovacijami in je zato dobro delujoč in povezan notranji trg storitev zaradi sedanje gospodarske in finančne krize ter kot pogoj za okrevanje toliko bolj potreben,
C. whereas services drive the economies of the Member States by creating jobs, growth and innovation, and whereas a well-functioning and integrated internal market in services is therefore all the more necessary in the light of the current economic and financial crisis and as a condition for recovery;
D. ker je direktiva o storitvah dejavnik rasti Evropske unije in ker je njeno celovito in pravilno izvajanje vključeno v okvir strategije Evropa 2020 ter Akta za enotni trg,
D. whereas the Services Directive is a lever for the growth of the European Union and whereas its full and correct implementation is included in the framework of the Europe 2020 strategy and the Single Market Act,
E. ker pravočasen in pravilen prenos direktive o storitvah v nacionalno zakonodajo pomeni izziv za uprave držav članic, vendar je hkrati potreben in tudi trdna osnova za razvoj upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami,
E. whereas, while timely and correct transposition of the Services Directive has been a challenge for the Member States' administrations, it is necessary and it is also a strong basis for the development of administrative cooperation between the Member States,
F. ker je bilo med postopkom preverjanja Evropski komisiji priglašenih skoraj 34 000 zahtevkov,
F. whereas close to 34 000 requirements have been notified to the European Commission in the context of the screening process,
2. poudarja, da je delujoč enotni trg storitev pogoj za spodbujanje rasti, dostojnega zaposlovanja in inovacij v Evropi ter za ohranitev konkurenčne vloge Evrope na svetovnem prizorišču;
Highlights the fact that a functioning Single Market in services is a prerequisite for generating growth, decent employment and innovation in Europe and for maintaining Europe's competitive role on the world stage;
4. meni, da sta za oblikovanje enotnega trga storitev najpomembnejša popolno izvajanje direktive o storitvah v vseh državah članicah ter vzpostavitev povsem delujočih enotnih kontaktnih točk;
Considers that the first priority for the creation of a Single Market in Services is the full and complete implementation of the Services Directive in all Member States and setting up fully operational Points of Single Contact;
Izkušnje s postopkom medsebojnega ocenjevanja
Experiences with the Mutual Evaluation Process
9. obžaluje zamude pri izvajanju direktive o storitvah v nekaterih državah članicah in meni, da so vplivale na postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja;
Deplores the delays in the implementation of the Services Directive in some Member States and considers that these have had an impact on the process of mutual evaluation;
16. ugotavlja, da so se deležniki v postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja vključevali le v omejenem obsegu; priznava, da je bila neka mera zaupnosti pomemben pogoj za vzpostavitev medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami; vendar obžaluje, da deležniki niso redno dobivali povratnih informacij;
Notes that the involvement of stakeholders in the process of mutual evaluation was limited; acknowledges that a certain degree of confidentiality was an important condition to create a mutual trust between Members States; Nevertheless, regrets that the regular feedback of the process has not been provided to the stakeholders;
Izsledki in spremljanje za izboljšanje delovanja notranjega trga storitev
Results and Follow-up to improve the functioning of the Internal Market for Services
19. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvešča o napredku in rezultatih dialoga z državami članicami o izvajanju direktive o storitvah; poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi sprejme dodatne izvršilne ukrepe;
Urges the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the progress and outcomes of the dialogue held with Member States on the implementation of the Services Directive; Calls on the Commission to take further enforcement measures when deemed necessary;
21. pozdravlja pobudo za preverjanje uspešnosti notranjega trga in upa, da se bo s tem občutno izboljšalo praktično razumevanje uporabe različnih zakonodajnih aktov EU in njihovega vzajemnega delovanja v praksi; meni, da bi bilo treba preverjanje uspešnosti izvesti ob upoštevanju vidika uporabnikov enotnega trga;
Welcomes the internal market performance check initiative and hopes that this exercise will significantly improve the practical understanding of how different pieces of EU legislation are applied and interact on the ground; Considers that the performance check exercise should be performed by taking into account the perspective of the Single Market users;
32. poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja redno preverjanje in ocenjevanje dela enotnih kontaktnih točk v državah članicah, ki imajo bistveno vlogo pri zagotavljanju informacij ponudnikom storitev na sodoben in potrošniku prijazen način;
Calls on the Commission to pay careful attention to the regular checks and evaluations of the work of the Points of Single Contact in Member States, which play a key role in making necessary information available to service-providers in an up-to-date and user-friendly manner;
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja kot orodje
The Mutual Evaluation Process as a tool
38. vseeno poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli cilje in končne rezultate medsebojnega ocenjevanja, preden predlaga medsebojno ocenjevanje za druge direktive, in tako zagotovi, da postopek ne bi po nepotrebnem obremenil ocenjevalnih organov;
Calls on the Commission, however, to clearly define the aims and deliverables of mutual evaluation before proposing mutual evaluation on other Directives, in order to ensure that the process does not impose unnecessary burdens on the evaluating authorities;
41. poudarja, da se namen primerjalnih tabel in medsebojnega ocenjevanja razlikuje, zato bi jih bilo treba obravnavati kot ločena orodja politike, ki jih ni mogoče izmenjati med seboj, ter da so korelacijske tabele zato nujne za prenos zakonodaje EU;
Points out that correlation tables and mutual evaluation have different purposes and therefore should be regarded as separate and not interchangeable policy tools, and that the correlation tables are therefore indispensable in the transposition of European legislation;
CILJ POROČILA
OBJECTIVE OF THE REPORT
Poročilo obravnava izkušnje z medsebojnim ocenjevanjem v okviru direktive o storitvah, ter na splošno, vendar pod nekaterimi pogoji podpira uporabo te metode na drugih področjih politik.
This report takes a look at the experiences of the mutual evaluation within the framework of the Services Directive and gives the general but conditional support to the application of this method for the other policy areas.
Preučuje tudi izsledke in spremljanje medsebojnega ocenjevanja z namenom boljšega delovanja notranjega trga storitev in podpira ukrepe, ki jih je predlagala Komisija.
This report also reflects on the results and follow – up of the mutual evaluation for the better functioning of internal market for services and supports actions proposed by the Commission.
Direktiva o storitvah, ki je bila sprejeta leta 2006, je še vedno najpomembnejše sredstvo za oblikovanje delujočega enotnega trga storitev.
The Services Directive was adopted in 2006 and remains a vital tool for the establishment of fully functioning Single Market for services.
Države članice si močno prizadevajo za njeno izvajanje.
Member States have made a significant effort towards implementation.
Vendar pa bi bilo treba še okrepiti prizadevanja za njeno celovito in pravilno izvajanje ter vzpostavitev delujočih enotnih kontaktnih točk.
Nevertheless efforts should be stepped up for the full and correct implementation of the Services Directive and setting up of fully operational Points of Single Contact.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja je predviden v členu 39 direktive o storitvah.
The mutual evaluation process was foreseen in Article 39 of the Services Directive.
To je novo orodje, ki je v pravnem aktu EU uporabljeno prvič.
It is a novel tool used for the first time in the EU legal instrument.
Njegov glavni cilj v okviru direktive o storitvah je bil oceniti stanje na notranjem trgu storitev po uveljavitvi direktive.
Its main goal in the framework of the Services Directive was to assess the state of the internal market for services after the implementation of the Directive.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja ni zajel vseh določb direktive, temveč se je usmeril na konkretne vrste zahtev, kjer direktiva ni predvidela prepovedi, pač pa je državam članicam dopuščala določen manevrski prostor.
The mutual evaluation process did not cover all the provisions of the Directive but was focused on the specific types of requirements for which the Directive did not provide for a prohibition, but which left a certain degree of discretion to the Member States.
Medsebojno ocenjevanje se je usmerilo na vrsto pravnih zahtev, ki jih morajo ponavadi izpolniti ponudniki storitev in zadevajo:
The mutual evaluation focused on the number of legal requirements typically imposed on the services providers, which concern:
1. ustanavljanje podjetij,
1. the establishment of businesses
2. čezmejno opravljanje storitev.
2. the cross border provision of services
Delovni dokument služb Komisije o postopku medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah ponuja pregled dela, ki so ga opravile države članice.
The Commission Staff Working Paper on the process of mutual evaluation of the Services Directive gives an overview of the work undertaken by Members States.
Razlaga tudi uporabljene pristope in izbiro politik držav članic pri ocenjevanju nekaterih zahtev.
It also sheds some light on the approaches applied and policy choices by the Member States when evaluating certain requirements.
Poleg tega ponuja prvo podrobno ceno izvajanja določb direktive o storitvah (zlasti kar zadeva člene 9, 15 in 16).
Furthermore it provides a first detailed assessment of the implementation of the provisions of the Services Directive (as regards especially Article 9, 15 and 16).
IZKUŠNJE S POSTOPKOM MEDSEBOJNEGA OCENJEVANJA
EXPERIENCES WITH THE MUTUAL EVALUATION PROCESS
Opozoriti je treba, da je člen 39 direktive o storitvah nedorečen glede natančnih ciljev postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja.
It should be noted that Article 39 of the Services Directive remains vague as to the precise objectives of the mutual evaluation.
Posledica te nenatančnosti so bila različna pričakovanja in dojemanja postopka med deležniki in tudi oblikovalci politike.
This lack of the precision resulted in different expectations and perceptions of process among stakeholders but also policy makers.
Pogosto se medsebojno ocenjevanje meša z delom pri uveljavitvi in prenosu direktive o storitvah v nacionalne zakonodaje.
The common confusion is to associate the mutual evaluation with the work on the implementation and the transposition of the Services Directive.
Zato je po mnenju poročevalke nujno poudariti, da je bilo medsebojno sodelovanje na vrsti šele po uveljavitvi.
Therefore your rapporteur thinks that it is necessary to underline that the mutual evaluation took place after the implementation.
Tak vrstni red je upravičen, če upoštevamo, da so med medsebojnim ocenjevanjem države članice razpravljale o spremembah svojega regulativnega okvira in zahtevah, ki so se ohranile, so bile odpravljene ali so se spremenile zaradi izvajanja direktive o storitvah.
This sequence seems to be justified when taking into account that during the mutual evaluation Member States were discussing the changes in their regulatory framework and the requirements maintained, abolished or changed as the result of the implementation of the Services Directive.
Razprave so tako omogočile boljše poznavanje položaja v vsaki države članici in preostalih ovir po uveljavitvi direktive o storitvah.
Thus the discussions enabled a better understanding of the situation in each Member State and the remaining barriers still in place after the implementation of the Services Directive.
To bi morali obravnavati kot velik prispevek k boljši oceni trenutnega stanja na enotnem trgu storitev.
This should be seen as a great contribution towards the better assessment of the current state of the Single Market for services.
Vendar pa so zamude pri izvajanju direktive o storitvah pomenile izziv za postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, saj so otežile razprave predvsem za tiste države članice, kjer prenos določb v nacionalno zakonodajo še ni bil dokončan.
However, the delays in the implementation of the Services Directive posed a challenge to the mutual evaluation process, as they made discussions more difficult especially for those Members States where the transposition was not finalised.
Pri medsebojnem ocenjevanju so bile države članice razdeljene v šest skupin s po petimi državami.
When working on the mutual evaluation, Members States have been divided in 6 clusters of 5 countries each.
Sestavo skupin je predlagala Komisija ob upoštevanju jezikov, ravni trgovine in zemljepisne bližine.
The clusters’ composition was proposed by the Commission taking into account languages, levels of trade and geographical proximity.
Vse države članice niso bile zadovoljne s svojo uvrstitvijo.
Not all Member States have been satisfied with the allocation made.
Skupinske razprave so veljale za osrednji del medsebojnega ocenjevanja.
Cluster discussions were considered a core element of the mutual evaluation.
Poročevalka upa, da se bo izkušnja z neposrednim sodelovanjem nacionalnih uprav v evropskem duhu še naprej uporabljala za enotni trg storitev.
Your rapporteur hopes that the experience of direct engagement of the national administrations and the "European spirit' will be further used for the single market in services.
Ob medsebojnem ocenjevanju pa se je pojavilo vprašanje, ali je postopek pregleden in, ali in do kakšne mere bi morali biti deležniki vključeni v postopek, ki jih neposredno zadeva.
The mutual evaluation raised however the questions about the transparency of the process and if, or to what extent, the stakeholders should be involved in the process that directly affects them.
Poročevalka je prepričana, da je za učinkovitost postopka potrebna neka mera zaupnosti, vendar bi morali deležniki prejeti poročilo o napredku.
Your rapporteur believes that the efficiency of the process requires a certain degree of confidentiality but that the reporting on the progress should have been provided to the stakeholders.
IZSLEDKI IN SPREMLJANJE ZA IZBOLJŠANJE DELOVANJA NOTRANJEGA TRGA STORITEV
RESULTS AND FOLLOW-UP TO IMPROVE THE FUNCTIONING OF THE INTERNAL MARKET FOR SERVICES