natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da narašča število različnih akterjev, ki so vključeni v krizne humanitarne razmere, in meni, da je treba v soglasju določiti smernice glede novih tveganj in odgovore nanje ter na izzive pri izvajanju in usklajevanju ter potrditi zavezanost EU humanitarnim načelom in mednarodnemu humanitarnemu pravu; opominja, da je EU največja donatorka humanitarne pomoči na svetu; poleg tega meni, da to ustrezno potrjujejo sklepi z zasedanja Evropskega sveta 21. in 22. junija 2007, v skladu s katerimi je bila humanitarna pomoč v osnutku Lizbonske pogodbe priznana kot samostojno politično področje EU;
Takes note of the increasing number of different actors involved in humanitarian crisis situations, and believes that the Consensus should provide guidance on and answers to the new risks and implementation and coordination challenges, while reaffirming the EU's commitment to humanitarian principles and IHL; recalls that the EU is the largest humanitarian aid donor in the world; and further believes that the conclusions of the European Council of 21-22 June 2007, following which humanitarian aid has been recognised as an EU policy area in its own right in the draft Treaty of Lisbon, are a welcome recognition of that fact;
Del I: Vizija EU glede humanitarne pomoči
Part I: The EU Vision of Humanitarian Aid
Skupni cilji
Common objectives
meni, da je treba v soglasje vključiti natančno opredelitev ciljev humanitarne pomoči EU na podlagi zgoraj omenjene Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1257/96 ter zgoraj navedenih načel in primerov dobre prakse človekoljubnega donatorstva (pobuda GHD), in da je treba med temi cilji posebno pozornost nameniti najbolj ranljivim skupinam, kot so ženske, otroci, invalidi, starejši in narodnostne manjšine ter begunci iz konfliktnih območij;
Takes the view that the Consensus should contain a detailed definition of the objectives of EU humanitarian aid, based on the above-mentioned Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 and on the above-mentioned Principles and Good Practice of Humanitarian Donorship (GHD), and that amongst these objectives particular attention should be paid to the most vulnerable groups, such as women, children, the disabled, the elderly and ethnic minorities, including refugees fleeing conflict zones;
poudarja, da mora učinkovito zagotavljanje humanitarne pomoči, vključno z nudenjem pomoči v kriznih razmerah, temeljiti na oceni razmer in potreb ter načelu, da zagotovitev sredstev za preživetje rešuje življenja, in usmerjeno mora na doseganju rezultatov; poudarja tudi, da humanitarna pomoč ni orodje za obvladovanje kriz ter jo je treba zagotavljati na pregleden način izključno na podlagi ocene dejanskih potreb in neodvisno od političnih vprašanj; posebej poudarja, da se je treba na vsak način izogniti negativnim vplivom pomoči v hrani na lokalne trge ali prihodnji odvisnosti in da bi morala ta pomoč prispevati k dolgoročni varnosti preskrbe s hrano; podpira mednarodna prizadevanja za reformo konvencije o pomoči v hrani, ki naj bi zagotovila spoštovanje teh načel;
Stresses that effective humanitarian action, including emergency food aid, should be situation- and needs-based, result-oriented and driven by the principle that saving livelihoods saves lives; stresses further that humanitarian aid is not a crisis management tool and should be allocated in transparent fashion solely on the basis of real needs and independently of all political considerations; stresses in particular that delivery of food aid must try by all means to avoid any harmful effect on local markets or future dependence and should contribute to long-term food security; supports international efforts to reform the Food Aid Convention to ensure respect for these principles;
poudarja, da mora biti cilj humanitarne pomoči omogočanje samorazvoja in samooskrbe držav oziroma regij prejemnic pomoči, ne pa njihova prevelika odvisnost od dodatne pomoči ali zunanje podpore;
Stresses that humanitarian aid must take account of self-development and self-sufficiency and must not be geared towards making the countries or regions to which the aid is given too dependent on further aid or external assistance;
Skupne vrednote, načela in dobra praksa
Common values, principles and good practice
poudarja, da morajo humanitarne dejavnosti EU usmerjati humanitarna načela, zapisana v načelih in dobri praksi humanitarnega donatorstva:
Stresses that the EU's humanitarian action should be guided by the humanitarian principles enshrined in the Principles and Good Practice of Humanitarian Donorship (GHD):
načelo človekoljubnosti, kar pomeni, da je v središču pozornosti reševanje človeških življenj in lajšanje trpljenja, kjerkoli se pojavi;
the principle of humanity, meaning the centrality of saving human lives and alleviating suffering wherever it is found;
načelo nepristranskosti, kar pomeni ukrepanje zgolj na temelju potreb, brez diskriminacije med ali v delih prizadetega prebivalstva;
the principle of impartiality, meaning the implementation of actions solely on the basis of need, without discrimination between or within affected populations;
načelo nevtralnosti, kar pomeni, da humanitarne akcije na območju, kjer se izvajajo, ne smejo podpirati nobene strani v oboroženem spopadu ali drugačnem sporu; in
the principle of neutrality, meaning that humanitarian action must not favour any side in an armed conflict or other dispute where such action is carried out; and
načelo neodvisnosti, kar pomeni, da morajo biti humanitarni cilji neodvisni od političnih, gospodarskih, vojaških ali drugih, ki bi jih lahko postavljali različni akterji v zvezi z območji, kjer se humanitarna akcija izvaja;
the principle of independence, meaning the autonomy of humanitarian objectives from the political, economic, military or other objectives that any actor may hold with regard to areas where humanitarian action is being implemented;
takojšnje ukrepanje, kar pomeni, da si je treba bolj prizadevati za odpravo neupravičenih zamud pri dostavi humanitarne pomoči, po potrebi pa tudi pod vprašaj postaviti morebitne zamude; in
immediacy, meaning a stronger emphasis on the elimination of all unreasonable delays in the supply of humanitarian aid and on questioning any delays when appropriate;
učinkovitost, kar pomeni, da morajo biti rezultati jasno izmerljivi, kar omogoča demokratični nadzor;
effectiveness, meaning that there is a clear measurability of output against which democratic accountability can be properly directed; and
ter meni, da si mora EU glede na svoj politični pomen in vpliv kot največja mednarodna donatorka dosledno prizadevati za spodbujanje teh načel in tako zagotoviti dostop do prizadetega prebivalstva in spoštovanje humanitarnega prostora;
considers that, in view of its political weight and influence as the largest international donor, the EU should consistently promote these principles in order to ensure access to crisis-affected populations and respect for humanitarian space;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za začetek dobrega donatorskega partnerstva, ki bi spodbudil splošno humanitarno reformo in donatorje, izvajalske partnerje in upravičence združil v skupni platformi; pozdravlja tudi smernice o spodbujanju spoštovanja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, ki jih je EU sprejela leta 2005; želi, da bi imela EU vodilno vlogo pri spremljanju zaščite, spodbujanju, razširjanju in krepitvi spoštovanja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, tudi s strani nedržavnih akterjev, da bi se ohranil humanitarni prostor; želi, da vse države članice, ki tega še niso storile, brezpogojno sprejmejo zgoraj navedena načela in dobro prakso človekoljubnega donatorstva (pobuda GHD); poudarja, da je treba ta načela izvajati v praksi, njihovo upoštevanje pa morajo redno (vsaki dve leti) oceniti institucije EU in stalni poročevalec Parlamenta za humanitarno pomoč;
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to launch a Good Humanitarian Partnership, enhancing global humanitarian reform by bringing together donors, implementing partners and beneficiaries in a joint platform and the adoption by the EU in 2005 of operational guidelines on the promotion of respect for IHL; wishes to see the EU play a leading role in monitoring the defence, promotion, dissemination and enforcement of respect for IHL, including by non-State actors, in order to preserve the humanitarian space; wishes to see all the Member States which have not yet done so subscribe without reservation to the above-mentioned Principles and Good Practice of Humanitarian Donorship (GHD); stresses the need for these principles to be translated into practice and for their observance to be assessed on a regular (biennial) basis by the EU institutions and Parliament's standing rapporteur on humanitarian aid;
meni, da se je treba bolj osredotočiti na varnost in zaščito humanitarnih delavcev, ki se morajo pogosto odpravljati na nevarna območja; obžaluje, da so ti delavci prepogosto žrtve nesmiselnega nasilja, zaprti ali zajeti kot talci; odločno obsoja vsakršna dejanja, uperjena proti humanitarnim delavcem;
Considers that more attention should be paid to the safety and protection of aid workers, who regularly have to venture into dangerous areas; deplores the fact that they are far too frequently the victims of senseless violence, imprisonment or hostage-taking; roundly condemns any action taken against aid workers;
ugotavlja, da so Združeni narodi v omenjeni resoluciji št. 60/1 sprejeli koncept "odgovornost za zaščito" zaradi vedno več kršitev mednarodnega humanitarnega prava in človekovih pravic in zaradi nezmožnosti ali nepripravljenosti vlad, da zaščitijo svoje državljane; opozarja, da je humanitarna pomoč eden od načinov, ki jih ima na voljo mednarodna skupnost za svoj prispevek k zaščiti ogroženega prebivalstva, ter poudarja skrb EU, da se odzove na takšne kršitve; poziva k temeljiti politični razpravi v državah članicah in institucijah Unije o pravici ali celo dolžnosti intervencije v primeru resne kršitve mednarodnega humanitarnega prava in/ali človekovih pravic; meni, da bi v tej politični razpravi morali upoštevati tudi ugotovitve in priporočila iz omenjenega poročila mednarodne komisije o intervencijah in državni pomoči v zvezi z "odgovornostjo za zaščito" z decembra 2001;
Notes the recognition of the concept of the 'responsibility to protect' in the above-mentioned UN Resolution 60/1 in response to the increase in violations of IHL and human rights and to the powerlessness or unwillingness of governments to protect their own citizens; recalls that humanitarian aid is one of the ways in which the international community can contribute to the protection of threatened peoples and stresses the EU's concern not to remain inactive in the face of such violations; calls for a thorough political debate in the Member States and EU institutions on the right, or indeed the duty, of intervention in cases of serious violation of IHL and/or human rights, taking also into account the conclusions and recommendations of the above-mentioned Report of December 2001 by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty on "The responsibility to protect";
meni, da bi morala Unija pripraviti pobude za uresničitev koncepta "odgovornost za zaščito" in dati prednost preventivnemu delovanju, civilnim sredstvom in podpori vladam tretjih držav pri izpolnjevanju njihove dolžnosti zaščite prebivalstva; poudarja, da se lahko prisilni ukrepi, kar zadeva tudi vojaško intervencijo, uporabijo le kot zadnja možnost in ob upoštevanju določil mednarodnega prava; še zlasti želi ponovno opozoriti, da bi moral varnostni svet vsakič, ko proučuje možnost uporabe sile, upoštevati pet meril upravičenosti, ki jih je 21. marca 2005 v svojem zgoraj navedenem poročilu predlagal generalni sekretar Združenih narodov in podprl Parlament, in sicer: stopnja ogroženosti, pravi namen, zadnja možnost, sorazmerna sredstva in razumne možnosti za uspeh; soglaša, da je treba načela v zvezi z uporabo sile in njeno odobritvijo določiti v posebni resoluciji varnostnega sveta;
Believes that the EU should develop initiatives to make the concept of 'responsibility to protect' a reality, while giving precedence to preventive action, civilian means and support for third-country governments in fulfilling their obligations to protect their populations; stresses that coercive measures, including military intervention, may only be used as a last resort and strictly in accordance with international law; in particular, reiterates that, when considering the use of force, the Security Council should always take into account the five criteria of legitimacy proposed by the above-mentioned report of 21 March 2005 by the UN Secretary-General and supported by Parliament: seriousness of threat, proper purpose, last resort, proportional means and a reasonable chance of success; agrees that the principles relating to the use of force and its authorisation should be laid down in a resolution of the Security Council;
Del II: Prenos načel v prakso: skupni okvir za humanitarno pomoč EU
Part II: Translating Principles into Practice: a common framework for EU Humanitarian Aid
Usklajevanje, skladnost in dopolnjevanje v EU
EU coordination, coherence and complementarity
meni, da mora soglasje vsebovati načela usklajevanja, skladnosti politike, dopolnjevanja in uskladitve postopkov med državami članicami, kot je že določeno v navedenem evropskem soglasju o razvoju, ter da mora Skupnost v celoti uporabiti člen 10 omenjene Uredbe (ES) št. 1257/96 in izkoristiti zmogljivosti GD ECHO in njegovo povezovalno vlogo; kljub temu poudarja, da morajo mehanizmi EU za usklajevanje okrepiti prizadevanja Združenih narodov, zlasti urada za usklajevanje humanitarne pomoči (OCHA), za mednarodno usklajevanje delovanja, ne pa ga podvajati, ter v to vključiti nacionalne in lokalne organe; Unijo poziva, naj oblikuje atlas donatorjev humanitarne pomoči EU, podobno kot v primeru razvojne pomoči Unije;
Considers that the Consensus should enshrine the principles of coordination, policy coherence, complementarity and harmonisation of procedures among the Member States, as already stated in the above-mentioned European Consensus on Development, and that the Community should make full use of Article 10 of the above-mentioned Council Regulation (EC) No 1257/96 and exploit the capabilities of DG ECHO in its federating role; stresses, nevertheless, that EU coordination mechanisms must reinforce the international coordination efforts of the United Nations, particularly those of OCHA rather than duplicate them, and include national and local authorities; calls on the EU to establish an EU humanitarian aid donors' atlas, similar to the exercise undertaken for EU development aid;
pozdravlja priznanje v sklepih predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 21. in 22. junija 2007, da je treba politiko humanitarne pomoči opredeliti kot samostojno politiko EU, in meni, da bi morale Skupnost in države članice spodbujati strateško politično razpravo o humanitarnih dejavnostih v ustreznem forumu Sveta z vzpostavitvijo posebne delovne skupine Sveta (npr. delovne skupine Sveta za humanitarno pomoč (COHUMA)), ki bi oblikovala metode za hitro in usklajeno zagotavljanje pomoči;
Welcomes the recognition in the Presidency conclusions of the European Council held in Brussels on 21 and 22 June 2007 of the need for humanitarian aid policy to be fully recognised as an EU policy in its own right, and considers therefore that the Community and the Member States should foster strategic policy discussion of humanitarian action in an adequate Council forum through the creation of a specific Council Working Group (e.g. a COHUMA, i.e. a Council Working Group on Humanitarian Aid), which will allow cohesive methods ensuring swift and consistent action to be drawn up;
Zagotavljanje ustrezne in učinkovite pomoči
Providing adequate and effective aid
meni, da se mora EU s soglasjem odločno zavezati k ustreznemu zagotavljanju humanitarne pomoči ter ustrezni predvidljivosti in prilagodljivosti financiranja na podlagi ustreznih letnih predhodnih proračunskih določb; poudarja, da bi morala EU dajati prednost kriznim humanitarnim razmeram, ki prejemajo premalo sredstev, so zanemarjene ali pozabljene; treba bi bilo tudi proučiti inovativne mehanizme za boljšo oceno razkoraka med potrebami in obstoječimi sredstvi ter poskrbeti za splošne humanitarne potrebe;
Considers that the Consensus should include a strong commitment by the EU to adequate provision of humanitarian aid as well as to adequate predictability and flexibility in funding, through adequate annual up-front budgetary provisions; stresses that the EU should prioritise those humanitarian crises which are underfunded, neglected or forgotten and that innovative mechanisms should be explored to better quantify the gap between needs and existing funds and to ensure that global humanitarian needs are met;
meni, da mora EU izraziti jasno stališče glede splošnega postopka reforme humanitarnega sistema ter zlasti podpreti Osrednji sklad za hitro odzivanje (CERF) kot koristen dodatek k obstoječim finančnim instrumentom, kjer predstavlja dodatni vir financiranja, vendar ne usmeri podpore na druge humanitarne operacije in partnerje; dalje meni, da mora EU pozdraviti področni pristop in spodbuditi vključitev številnih humanitarnih akterjev;
Considers that the EU should clearly position itself in the global humanitarian reform process, and in particular to support the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) as a useful supplement to a range of available financing instruments, where this represents additional financing that does not displace support to other humanitarian operations and partners, to welcome the 'clusters approach' and to promote the inclusiveness of a broad range of humanitarian actors;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije o ustanovitvi skupnega okvira EU za ocenjevanje potreb in izmenjavo strokovnih analiz ter opozarja, da mora dati EU prednost lokalnim in regionalnim virom, kadar je to mogoče;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal to establish an EU common framework for the assessment of needs and sharing of expert analysis; recalls that the EU should give preference to local and regional sourcing whenever possible;
poudarja, da je v nujnih razmerah, zlasti v primeru naravnih nesreč, prvih 48 ur bistvenega pomena za reševanje življenj, da pa se je izkazalo, da mednarodna skupnost pri takojšnjem odzivu ni dovolj učinkovita; meni, da bi se EU morala s tem izzivom soočiti in po eni strani okrepiti preprečevanje, pripravljenost in odzivno sposobnost na lokalni ravni, po drugi pa izboljšati usklajevanje, mehanizme zgodnjega opozarjanja in predhodno pripravo materiala in zalog na mednarodni ravni; poziva EU, naj podpre in dopolnjuje mednarodna prizadevanja urada OCHA in Združenih narodov za okrepitev hitrih odzivnih sposobnosti, pa tudi takojšnje financiranje in zagotavljanje posebnih ekip za hitro ukrepanje;
Emphasises that in emergency situations, and especially in the case of emergencies caused by natural disasters, the first forty-eight hours are crucial in order to save lives, and that the international community has demonstrated that its immediate response is not efficient enough; considers that the EU should meet this challenge, on the one hand, by strengthening local prevention, preparedness and response capacity and, on the other , by improving coordination, early warning mechanisms and adequate pre-positioning of material and stocks at international level; calls on the EU to support and complement international efforts led by OCHA and the UN to strengthen rapid response capabilities, including instant access to funding as well as stand-by teams for emergency operations;
meni, da bi morala EU povečati naložbe v razumevanje in spremljanje faktorjev, ki vplivajo na ranljivost prebivalstva; še posebej EU poziva, da se v vseh humanitarnih operacijah odzove na nujne zdravstvene potrebe, zlasti kar zadeva reproduktivno zdravje, in sicer v skladu s standardi SPHERE;
Considers that the EU should invest more in understanding and monitoring the vulnerability factors of the population; calls in particular on the EU to ensure that in all humanitarian operations emergency health needs are met, in particular as regards reproductive health, in line with the respective SPHERE standards;
podpira prizadevanja mednarodne zveze in nacionalnih združenj Rdečega križa in Rdečega polmeseca, da bi ugotovili težave in pripravili priporočila na področju mednarodnih zakonov, predpisov in načel za odzive na nesreče, ter pričakuje pozitivne rezultate 30. mednarodne konference Rdečega križa in Rdečega polmeseca, ki bo potekala novembra 2007;
Supports the efforts by the International Federation and National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies to identify problems and make recommendations in the field of International Disaster Response Laws, Rules and Principles (IDRL), and looks forward to the results of the 30th International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent, to be held in November 2007;
Raznolikost in kakovost partnerstva
Diversity and quality in partnership
pozdravlja predloge Komisije, da se poudari podpora EU velikemu številu izvajalskih partnerjev, zlasti nevladnim organizacijam, Združenim narodom in gibanju Rdeči križ/Rdeči polmesec, ter podpira merila za izbiro partnerjev, ki jih je predlgala; poziva Komisijo, naj nudi pomoč izvajalskim agencijam iz novih držav članic (EU-12, tj. desetih držav članic, ki so k EU pristopile leta 2004, ter Bolgarije in Romunije, ki sta pristopili leta 2007), da začnejo v celoti izvajati dejavnosti na področju zagotavljanja humanitarne pomoči; meni, da je treba v soglasju priznati in dodatno opredeliti različne vloge, pooblastila in primerjalne prednosti različnih humanitarnih udeležencev, da bi preprečili navzkrižje pooblastil in tekmovanje za pridobitev sredstev, ter da mora EU podpirati krepitev zmogljivosti v humanitarni skupnosti, pri tem pa posebno pozornost nameniti zmogljivostim lokalnih in regionalnih organov; meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti vlogi nevladnih organizacij, nacionalnih združenjem Rdečega kriza in Rdečega polmeseca ter civilne družbe na severu in jugu, ne le pri dostavljanju pomoči, ampak tudi pri oblikovanju politike, ki bi upoštevala dejanske potrebe in skrbi lokalnih partnerjev na jugu, ter pri pridobivanju podpore evropskih državljanov;
Welcomes the Commission's proposals to underline the EU's support for a plurality of implementing partners, in particular NGOs, the UN and the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, and supports its proposed criteria for partner selection; calls on the Commission to help implementing agencies from the new Member States (the EU-12, i.e., the ten new Member States, which acceded to the EU in 2004, and Bulgaria and Romania, which acceded to the EU in 2007) become fully integrated into humanitarian aid activities; considers that the Consensus should recognise and further define the different roles, mandates and comparative advantages of the various humanitarian actors, in order to avoid a conflict of mandates and competition for resources among them, and that the EU should support capacity-building within the humanitarian community, with particular attention to local and regional capacity; believes that special attention should be given to the role of NGOs, the National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and civil society actors, both from the South and the North, not only in the delivery of aid, but also in developing policies that reflect the real needs and concerns of local partners in the South and in gaining the support of European citizens;
meni, da bi morala EU oblikovati strategije za povezavo z netradicionalnimi donatorji, katerih financiranje je pogosto namensko in/ali pogojeno, da se spodbujajo model pomoči, ki temelji na potrebah, načela mednarodnega humanitarnega prava in koncept partnerstva; pri tem pa poudarja, da ti novi viri financiranja ne smejo voditi v zmanjševanje sredstev, ki jih nakazujejo države članice EU in Komisija;
Believes that the EU should develop strategies to reach out to non-traditional donors whose funding is often earmarked and/or conditional, with the aim of promoting a model of needs-based aid, the principles of IHL and the concept of partnership; stresses however that these new sources of funding must not result in a reduction in the funds coming from the EU Member States and the Commission;