natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker ta resolucija za vsak organ v smislu člena 185 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 vsebuje horizontalne pripombe, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici v skladu s členom 96 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 in člena 3 Priloge V Poslovnika Parlamenta,
whereas this resolution contains, for each body within the meaning of Article 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, the horizontal observations accompanying the discharge decision in accordance with Article 96 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 and Article 3 of Annex V to Parliament's Rules of Procedure,
ker so po sprejetju prej omenjenega sporočila Komisije Parlament, Svet in Komisija ponovno začeli projekt za opredelitev skupnega okvira za agencije in oblikovali medinstitucionalno delovno skupino,
whereas, following the adoption of the above-mentioned Commission Communication, Parliament, the Council and the Commission have re-launched the project of defining a common framework for the agencies and set up an inter-institutional working group,
opaža, da je Računsko sodišče leta 2007 revidiralo 23 decentraliziranih agencij, tri izvajalske agencije in Agencijo za oskrbo Euratom, organ, ki je bil uveden s pogodbo o Euratomu; ugotavlja, da so subvencije iz proračuna Skupnosti za decentralizirane agencije leta 2007 znašale 452 000 000 EUR; poudarja, da se je v proračune agencij iz drugih virov, na primer z lastnimi prihodki v obliki pristojbin, prispevki držav EFTA in posebnimi prispevki iz programov Skupnosti in drugih programov, nateklo več kot 1 000 000 000 EUR;
Observes that in 2007 the European Court of Auditors (ECA) audited 23 decentralised agencies, 3 executive agencies and the Euratom Supply Agency, a body set up under the Euratom Treaty; notes that the subsidies from the Community budget in 2007 for the decentralised agencies amounted to EUR 452 000 000; emphasises that more than EUR 1 000 000 000 has been allocated to agencies' budgets through other revenues such as own revenues from fees, contributions from EFTA countries and special contributions of Community programmes;
ugotavlja, da se je število agencij, ki so vključene v postopek podelitve razrešnice, močno povečalo v zadnjih letih z osem agencij leta 2000 na 21 decentraliziranih in tri izvajalske agencije leta 2007, ne da bi upoštevali tri agencije, ki jih je Računsko sodišče revidiralo, a niso vključene v postopek Parlamenta za podelitve razrešnice;
Notes that the number of agencies subject to the discharge procedure has greatly increased in recent years from 8 in 2000 to 21 decentralised plus three executive agencies in 2007, not including three agencies which are audited by the ECA but not subject to discharge by Parliament;
poudarja, da je proračunski organ v kadrovskem načrtu decentraliziranim agencijam odobril 3 487,5 delovnih mest; ugotavlja, da je bilo sodeč po podatkih iz dokumentov Računskega sodišča zapolnjenih 2 823 delovnih mest, poleg tega pa še 961,5 delovnih mest s pogodbenimi delavci ali nacionalnimi strokovnjaki;
Points out that the budgetary authority has authorised 3 487,5 posts in the establishment plans of the decentralised agencies; notes that, according to the documents provided by the ECA, 2 823 posts have been filled, in addition to the 961,5 contractual agent and national expert posts;
pozdravlja prej omenjeno sporočilo Komisije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnicah za leto 2006;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission report on the follow-up to 2006 Discharge Decisions;
znova poudarja, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ne vsebuje opredelitve agencije, in se zavzema za to, da bi se agencije opredelile kot "organi, ki jih ustanovi Skupnost in so pravne osebe" Glej dokaze v študiji o razrešnicah agencijam, ki jo je pripravila enota za proračunsko podporo Evropskega parlamenta decembra 2006.
Points out again that Community law does not contain a definition of an agency, and supports the definition of agencies as "bodies set up by the Communities having legal personality" See the arguments developed in the Study on the Agencies' discharge by the Budgetary Support Unit of the European Parliament, December 2006.
; znova navaja tri vrste agencij, ki ustrezajo tej opredelitvi, in sicer: decentralizirane agencije, izvajalske agencije in drugi organi;
; recalls the three categories of agency that fit this definition, namely decentralised agencies, executive agencies and other bodies;
v zvezi s tem ponavlja, da je izraz "decentralizirane agencije" splošna oznaka za tradicionalne agencije; meni, da je izraz "regulativna agencija", ki se vse bolj uporablja kot splošno poimenovanje, zavajajoč, saj vse decentralizirane agencije nimajo regulativnih nalog;
Reiterates in this context the term "decentralised agencies" as a general term for the traditional agencies; considers that the term "regulatory agency", which is increasingly used as a generic term, is misleading, as not all decentralised agencies have regulatory tasks;
znova opozarja, da evropski zakonodajalec decentralizirane agencije ustanavlja iz različnih razlogov, na primer za opravljanje določenih storitev, zaposlovanje posebnih strokovnjakov, izvajanje regulativnih nalog in spremljanje;
Recalls that decentralised agencies are set up by the European legislator for a variety of reasons such as the provision of certain services, the employment of specialist expertise and the carrying-out of regulatory and monitoring tasks;
meni, da sta določitev proračuna decentraliziranih organov in ocena izvrševanja tega proračuna osrednji nalogi Odbora za proračun;
Considers the establishment of the budget of decentralised bodies and assessment of the implementation of the respective budget as core responsibilities of its Committee on Budgets;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v naslednjem letnem poročilu zaradi preglednosti obravnava vse tri vrste agencij;
Urges the ECA, for the sake of transparency, to consider the three categories of agencies in its next annual report;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče opazilo izboljšanje glede finančne discipline v primerjavi s proračunskim letom 2006, vendar so pri nekaterih agencijah na področju zaposlovanja in javnih naročil še vedno prisotne pomanjkljivosti, s katerimi se morajo soočiti odredbodajalci;
Notes that the ECA observed an improvement with regard to financial discipline compared to the financial year 2006, but that nevertheless in some of the agencies the areas of recruitment and procurement still contained weaknesses which must be addressed by the authorising officers;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče pri mnogih agencijah ponovno odkrilo resne težave pri izvajanju pravil javnega naročanja in kadrovskih predpisov; ni pripravljen sprejeti, da te pomanjkljivosti trajajo že več let; meni, da revizija Uredbi (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 ne bo rešila teh težav in da bi bilo treba temeljito pregledati pravni okvir;
Deplores the fact that the ECA again found serious problems as regards the implementation of procurement rules and the Staff Regulations in many agencies; is not prepared to accept that these weaknesses have persisted over many years; considers that the revision of the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 will not do away with these problems and that a fundamental overhaul of the legal framework is needed;
je seznanjen z izjavo Komisije, da so vse agencije, ki so želele prestopiti k ABAC (računovodstvo na podlagi nastanka poslovnih dogodkov), dobile vso potrebno podporo; ugotavlja, da so agencije v nekaterih primerih menile, da podpora ni zadostna;
Notes the Commission's statement that all necessary support was granted to those agencies wishing to migrate to ABAC (Accrual Based Accounting); notes that the agencies in some cases considered the support as insufficient;
ugotavlja, da je bilo vprašanje agencij, ki precenjujejo svoje finančne zahteve, obravnavano v revidirani Uredbi (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, ki vsebuje določbo za okrepitev obveznosti agencij, da morajo v svojih zahtevkih za plačila predložiti natančno napoved svojih dejanskih finančnih potreb skozi celo leto, da se preprečijo nepotrebni denarni tokovi;
Notes that the issue of agencies over-estimating their cash requirements was addressed in the revised Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 , which contains provisions reinforcing the agencies' obligation to submit, in their payment requests, rigorous forecasts of their real cash requirements throughout the year, in order to avoid unnecessary cash-flows;
poziva Komisijo, naj obravnava tehnični pavšalni odbitek za zmanjšanje presekov v primeru nizkih stopenj izvrševanja in vztrajno visokih stopenj prostih delovnih mest, kar bi sprožilo znižanje namenskih prejemkov;
Urges the Commission to consider technical abatement in order to lower surpluses in case of low implementation rates and persistently high vacancy rates, which will also trigger a reduction of assigned revenue;
v zvezi s tem opozarja na težave decentraliziranih agencij pri zaposlovanju visokokvalificiranih kadrov in strokovnjakov; poziva Komisijo in Evropski urad za izbor osebja, naj okrepita prizadevanja glede podpore;
Notes, in this context, the difficulties of decentralised agencies in recruiting highly qualified staff and experts; invites the Commission and the European Personnel Selection Office to strengthen their supporting efforts;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej nadzira izvrševanje proračuna agencij za leto 2008 in 2009 ter izvede potrebne prilagoditve predlogov proračunov agencij;
Urges the Commission to continue scrutinizing the agencies' budget implementation for 2008 and 2009 and to make the necessary adjustments to the agencies' budget proposals;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije od predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2009, da pri izračunu prispevka Skupnosti sistematično upošteva zadnje znane presežke (v primeru predhodnega predloga proračuna za leto 2009, tiste iz leta n-2); za boljšo preglednost in učinkovitost poziva Komisijo, naj kot glavno pravilo zagotovi podrobne informacije o postopkih izračuna in utemeljitve vseh vrst namenskih prejemkov, s katerimi razpolagajo agencije, zlasti tistih, ki so posledica presežkov prejšnjih let;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts, since the 2009 Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB), to systematically take into account the last known surpluses (in the case of the 2009 PDB, those of year n-2) when calculating the Community contribution; in order to improve transparency and efficiency, calls on the Commission, as a principal rule, to provide detailed information on the procedures for calculating and accounting for all types of assigned revenue at the agencies' disposal, specifically those arising from previous years' surpluses;
pozdravlja sklep Komisije, da bo upoštevala zahteve proračunskega organa in pri pripravi predhodnega predloga proračuna decentraliziranih agencij za leto 2009 upoštevala namenske prejemke; meni, da je to nedvomno korak k večji proračunski preglednosti;
Welcomes the Commission's decision to follow the requests of the budgetary authority to take assigned revenues into account when drawing up the PDB for the decentralised agencies for 2009; considers that this is undoubtedly a step towards greater budgetary transparency;
opozarja, da sedanja uporaba instrumentov namenskih prejemkov še vedno ogroža preglednost proračuna in dobro finančno poslovodenje sredstev EU, ker so ocene namenskih prejemkov še vedno težavne in ker različne vrste, leta izvora in postopki za sprostitev namenskih prejemkov ne omogočajo njihove vključitve v proračunsko načrtovanje in upravljanje na jasen način;
Draws attention to the fact that the current use of the assigned revenue instruments still bears risks for budgetary transparency and sound financial management of EU funds insofar as estimations of assigned revenue remain difficult and the various types, years of origin and procedures to release assigned revenue does not enable them to be integrated in the budget planning and management in a clear manner;
ugotavlja, da so tri izvajalske agencije v letu 2007 prevzele obveznosti za približno 550 000 000 EUR sredstev iz programov Skupnosti; poleg sredstev za poslovanje je bilo porabljenih še 47 000 000 EUR za upravne namene, tj. delovanje izvajalskih agencij; ugotavlja, da je v teh agencijah delalo 119 začasnih in 279 pogodbenih uslužbencev;
Notes that in 2007 about EUR 550 000 000 of Community programme funds were committed by three executive agencies; in addition to the operational appropriations, EUR 47 000 000 was used for administrative purposes, i.e. operating the respective executive agency; notes that 119 temporary agents and 279 contract agents were operative in these agencies;
znova opominja na dejstvo, da se sredstva iz proračunov za operativne programe uporabljajo za financiranje izključno upravnih nalog; poziva Odbor za proračunski nadzor, naj v prihodnje budno spremlja, kako poteka zunanje izvajanje upravnih nalog Komisije;
Reiterates the fact that the amounts taken from operational programme envelopes are used to finance purely administrative operations; invites its Committee on Budgetary Control to monitor closely future developments in the outsourcing of the administrative tasks of the Commission;
ugotavlja, da Agencija za oskrbo Euratom deluje kot upravna enota Komisije, kar je mogoče razbrati tudi iz proračunske nomenklature in dejstva, da je generalni direktor te agencije uslužbenec Komisije;
Notes that the Euratom Supply Agency functions as an administrative unit of the Commission, which is reflected by the budget nomenclature and by the fact that its Director-General is a staff member of the Commission;
Skladnost s Finančno uredbo in kadrovskimi predpisi
Compliance with financial regulations and the Staff Regulations
ugotavlja, da je resna težava, ker je vrsta agencij znova in znova kritiziranih zaradi nespoštovanja pravil, kot je Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, zlasti pravil javnega naročanja in kadrovskih predpisov; ugotavlja, da je glavni vzrok ta, da je večina pravil namenjenih večjim institucijam in da večina manjših agencij nima kritične mase, ki bi zmogla izpolnjevati predpisane zahteve;
Notes that it is a serious problem that a number of agencies are repeatedly criticised for not following rules such as Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, in particular the procurement rules, and the Staff Regulations; notes that the principal reason is that most rules are designed for larger institutions and that most of the small agencies do not have the critical mass to be able to cope with these regulatory requirements;
obžaluje, da Komisija kljub zahtevi Parlamenta iz resolucije o razrešnici za agencije iz leta 2006 ni predložila hitre rešitve in jo zato ponovno poziva, naj poišče hitro rešitev za povečanje učinkovitosti tako, da bo združila upravne funkcije različnih agencij;
Regrets that the Commission, despite Parliament's request in 2006 discharge resolutions on agencies, has not presented a rapid solution and therefore asks the Commission again to look for a quick solution in order to enhance effectiveness by grouping the administrative functions of various agencies together;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj si še bolj prizadeva pri zagotavljanju vse potrebne upravne pomoči relativno majhnim in zlasti novoustanovljenim agencijam; glede na slabe izkušnje iz preteklosti poziva Komisijo, naj v najkrajšem možnem času objavi agencijam namenjene posebne smernice o uporabi finančnih pravil v zvezi z zaposlovanjem osebja, oddaje javnih naročil in podobno;
Encourages the Commission to increase its efforts in providing all necessary administrative assistance to relatively small and especially newly-created agencies; bearing in mind negative experiences from the past; calls on the Commission to issue in the shortest possible time special guidelines for the agencies concerning the application of financial rules in relation to staff recruitment, public procurement and so on;
namerava v zvezi s tem zelo pozorno oceniti raziskavo o možnosti in izvedljivosti skupne službe za podporo za agencije EU, ki sta jo naročila Odbor za proračun in Odbor za proračunski nadzor;
Will, in this context, assess very carefully the study entitled "Opportunity and feasibility of establishing common support services for EU agencies" commissioned by its Committee on Budgets and Committee on Budgetary Control;
je zadovoljen, da je služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije v svojem letnem poročilu dejavnosti za leto 2007 umaknila zadržke iz prejšnjega leta, ko je navedla, da zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev ne more enkrat letno revidirati vseh operativnih decentraliziranih agencij;
Is satisfied that the Commission's internal audit service, in its annual activity report 2007, lifted its reservation from the previous year, when it declared that it was not in a position to audit each of the operational decentralised agencies once a year due to a lack of resources;
pozdravlja pragmatično sodelovanje med notranjim revizorjem Komisije ter notranjimi revizorji in drugimi osebami, odgovornimi za notranjo revizijo v agencijah;
Welcomes the pragmatic cooperation between the internal auditor of the Commission and the internal auditors and other persons in charge of internal audit in the agencies;
opominja, da je Parlament v svoji resoluciji o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 vprašal agencije, če in kako izpolnjujejo obveznost iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002, da pošljejo letno poročilo o notranji reviziji organu, pristojnemu za podelitev razrešnice, in Komisiji; obžaluje, da je od 21 agencij, ki so vključene v postopek podelitve razrešnice za leto 2007, Parlament prejel to poročilo le od dveh agencij (Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja in Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu);
Recalls that Parliament asked the agencies, in its 2006 discharge resolutions on agencies, if and how they comply with the obligation in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 to send to the discharge authority and the Commission an annual report on internal audits; regrets the fact that, whereas 21 agencies are subject to the 2007 discharge procedure, Parliament only received such a report from two (the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training and the European Aviation Safety Agency);
Ocena delovanja agencij
Evaluation of the agencies" performance
je seznanjen z nadaljnjim ukrepanjem Komisije po sprejetju resolucije o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 in ugotavlja, da je septembra 2008 končala:
Notes the Commission's follow-up on the 2006 discharge resolutions on the agencies, and that in September 2008 it finalised the following:
pregled ocene decentraliziranih agencij, ki ponuja seznam že ocenjenih agencij in povzetek glavnih ugotovitev;
an overview of the evaluation of the decentralised agencies, which provides a list of the agencies already assessed and a summary of the major findings;
dokument o sedanjih razmerah in načrtovanju glede ocene decentraliziranih agencij; ter
a document on the state of play and planning with regard to evaluation of the decentralised agencies; and
metaštudijo o decentraliziranih agencijah z medsektorsko analizo o ugotovitvah ocene, ki jo je pripravil zunanji izvajalec;
a "Meta-study on decentralised agencies: cross-cutting analysis of evaluation findings", prepared by an external contractor;
je prepričan, da bo ocena decentraliziranih agencij, ki jo je začela in jo nadzoruje Komisija in naj bi bila končana še leta 2009, prispevala k opredelitvi pomanjkljivosti in slabosti teh agencij; je zadovoljen, da je Komisija vzpostavila referenčno skupino, ki naj bi začela študijo;
Is convinced that the evaluation of decentralised agencies launched and supervised by the Commission, and to be completed by the end of 2009, will contribute to the assessment of shortfalls and shortcomings of the agencies; is satisfied by the fact that the Commission has set up a reference group to launch the study;
opominja na horizontalno oceno Komisije o decentraliziranih agencijah, navedeno v prej omenjenem sporočilu, katere rezultati bi morali biti na voljo do leta 2009-2010; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo ocene agencij postale preglednejše, kar je v interesu agencij in zainteresiranih strani;
Recalls the Commission's horizontal evaluation of the decentralised agencies referred to in its above-mentioned Communication, the results of which should be available by 2009-10; calls on the Commission to ensure that evaluations of agencies become more transparent in the interests of both the agencies and stakeholders;
opominja, da je Parlament v svojih resolucijah o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2006 pozval agencije, naj preučijo možnost medagencijske disciplinske komisije; je seznanjen s tem, da je bil sicer dosežen napredek, da pa še vedno ostajajo težave, zlasti pri iskanju osebja iz primernih kariernih razredov, ki bi bili člani komisije; poziva agencije, naj obvestijo organ, pristojen za razrešnice, ali je ustanovitev medagencijske disciplinske komisije izvedljiva ali ne, ter naj po potrebi predložijo alternativno rešitev;
Recalls that Parliament, in its 2006 discharge resolutions concerning agencies, called on the agencies to consider an inter-agency disciplinary board; notes that progress has been made, but that difficulties remain, in particular due to problems in finding staff who have the appropriate career grade to be a member of the board; calls on the agencies to inform the discharge authority as to whether the inter-agency disciplinary board is feasible or not and, if applicable, to come forward with an alternative solution;
Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 5/2008
ECA Special Report No 5/2008
pozdravlja pravočasno objavo omenjenega posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča in odločno poziva decentralizirane agencije, naj upoštevajo pomanjkljivosti, opredeljene v poročilu, in ukrepajo v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča;
Welcomes the timely publication by the ECA of its above-mentioned special report, and urges the decentralised agencies to take on board the shortcomings identified in the report as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA;
poudarja, da morajo osnovni akti agencij EU vsebovati jasno opredelitev njihovih nalog in pristojnosti ter poudariti pristop dela agencij, ki temelji na rezultatih;
Points out that the basic acts of the EU agencies must contain a clear definition of their tasks and competences and highlight the results-based approach of the agencies' work;
poudarja, da morajo agencije pripraviti večletne delovne programe v skladu z večletno strategijo Skupnosti v sektorju; zadevni letni delovni programi morajo določati jasne, specifične in merljive cilje, ki bodo osnova za ukrepe, vire, pristope in časovne razporede za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja pričakovanih rezultatov; poudarja, da mora delovni program spoštovati meje proračuna agencije, kot jih odobri proračunski organ;
Stresses that the agencies must draw up multiannual work programmes in accordance with the multiannual Community strategy in the sector; the relevant annual work programme should set clear, specific and measurable objectives, which should then form the basis of actions, resources, approaches and timetables in order to guarantee the achievement of expected results; underlines that the work programme should respect the limits of the agency's budget as authorised by the budgetary authority;
zahteva, naj upravni odbori agencij EU pri načrtovanju nalog in virov (finančnih in človeških) dosežejo največjo možno skladnost z uvedbo proračunskega načrtovanja in upravljanja na podlagi dejavnosti (ABB/ABM), in poudarja, da za agencije veljata načelo dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in proračunska disciplina;
Demands that the EU agencies' management boards achieve maximum convergence between the planning of tasks and of resources (both financial and human) through the introduction of activity-based budgeting and management (ABB/ABM), and underlines that the agencies are subject to the principle of sound financial management and budgetary discipline;
ugotavlja, da mora delo vsake agencije spremljati ocena tveganja za čim boljšo optimizacijo izdatkov in upravljanja človeških virov;
Notes that the work of each agency should be accompanied by risk assessment in order to optimise expenditure as well as human resource management;