natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da je bila velika večina ukrepov v sedanjem akcijskem načrtu izvedenih zadovoljivo;
Notes that the vast majority of the measures contained in the current action plan have been implemented satisfactorily;
ugotavlja, da je bil zaradi akcijskega načrta 2006–2010 dosežen napredek pri dobrem počutju živali, da pa se evropskim kmetom njihov trud ni poplačal na trgih in v mednarodni trgovini; vztraja, da mora biti to poudarjeno v naslednjem akcijskem načrtu;
Notes that there has been a positive development in the welfare of animals as a result of the action plan 2006-2010, but points out that the EU's farmers have not benefited from their efforts on the markets and in international trade and maintains that this should be highlighted in the next action plan;
ceni vloženi trud pri iskanju nadomestnih metod za poskuse na živalih vendar obžaluje dejstvo, da še vedno ni bilo storjeno dovolj za zagotovitev uporabe takšnih nadomestnih metod, kadar so na voljo, kot to določa pristojna zakonodaja EU;
Appreciates the work which has been done to develop alternatives to animal testing, but deplores the fact that not enough has yet been done to ensure that such alternatives are used if they are available, as required by the relevant EU legislation;
priznava prizadevanja Komisije za vključevanje netrgovinskih zahtev, vključno z dobrim počutjem živali, v dvostranske trgovinske sporazume, vendar poudarja, da je treba take netrgovinske zahteve učinkovito spodbujati prek STO;
Acknowledges the efforts of the Commission to include non-trade concerns, including animal welfare, in bilateral trade agreements, but stresses that such non-trade concerns must be promoted efficiently via the WTO;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, koliko napredka je bilo doseženega v pogajanjih v okviru STO glede priznavanja tako imenovanih netrgovinskih vprašanj, kamor sodi tudi dobro počutje živali, ter v kolikšni meri se vprašanja in standardi dobrega počutja živali upoštevajo v krogu pogajanj STO v Dohi;
Calls on the Commission to outline what progress has been made in WTO negotiations towards securing acknowledgment of non-trade-related concerns, which include animal welfare, as well as the extent to which animal welfare issues and standards are being taken into account in the Doha round of WTO negotiations;
z velikim zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bil v okviru projekta „The Animal Welfare Quality Project“ dosežen velik napredek glede novih znanstvenih dosežkov in spoznanj v zvezi s kazalniki zdravstvenega varstva in dobrega počutja živali; kljub temu pa opozarja, da projekt ni v celoti upošteval spodbujanja uporabe teh kazalnikov v praksi;
Notes with great satisfaction the progress which has been made in the Animal Welfare Quality Project as regards new science and knowledge relating to animal health and welfare indicators; notes, however, that this project has not fully taken into account the promotion, in practice, of the use of these indicators;
priznava, da je treba nadgraditi obstoječa pravila za prevoz živali v državah članicah EU ter zagotoviti njihovo izvajanje, zlasti pa se je treba posvetiti vprašanju razvoja satelitskega sistema za sledenje prevozu živali; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v preostalem času pred iztekom akcijskega načrta izpolni svoje obveznosti na tem področju ter predstavi študijo, ki jo je zahteval Evropski parlament in je omenjena v členu 32 Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2005; zahteva, naj se pred uveljavitvijo vsakih novih pravil izvede ocena ekonomskih vplivov na živinorejo, ki bi morala temeljiti na znanstveno dokazanih in objektivnih kazalnikih
Recognises that there is a need to follow up and ensure proper implementation of the existing rules on animal transport in the EU Member States, with particular reference to the issue of developing a satellite system to monitor such transport, and urges the Commission, in the time still remaining before the action plan expires, to discharge its responsibilities in this field and to present the study requested by Parliament and referred to in Article 32 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2005; requests an economic impact analysis on livestock farming to be conducted before any new rules, which should be based on scientifically proven and objective indicators, are implemented;
meni, da bi bilo smiselno spodbuditi regionalno rejo, dajanje na trg in zakol živali, s čimer bi preprečili dolge prevoze plemenskih živali in živali za zakol;
Takes the view that it would make sense to create incentives for the regional breeding, marketing and slaughter of animals in order to obviate the need for breeding and slaughter animals to be transported over long distances;
meni, da imajo živalski vrtovi pomembno vlogo pri obveščanju javnosti o ohranjanju prosto živečih živali in njihovem dobrem počutju; je zaskrbljen nad pomanjkanjem strogega nadzora za zagotovitev spoštovanja Direktive Sveta 1999/22/ES UL L 94, 9.4.1999, str.
Believes that zoos play an important role in informing the public about the conservation and welfare of wild animals; is concerned that there is a lack of stringent supervision to ensure compliance with Council Directive 1999/22/EC OJ L 94, 9.4.1999, p.
o zadrževanju prosto živečih živali v živalskih vrtovih ter poziva Komisijo, naj sproži raziskavo o učinkovitosti izvajanja te direktive v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije;
relating to the keeping of wild animals in zoos, and urges the Commission to initiate a study of the effectiveness and implementation of the Directive in all European Union Member States;
pozdravlja doseženi napredek pri spoštovanju zahtev za prašičerejo, čeprav še vedno obstajajo primeri neupoštevanja pravil; je pa zaskrbljen, ker kljub priporočilom in sklepom Evropske agencije za varnost hrane na tem področju še vedno ni delujočih načrtov v zvezi z izvajanjem posameznih določb direktive 2008/120/ES z dne 18. decembra 2008 o določitvi minimalnih pogojev za zaščito prašičev; zato poziva Komisijo, države članice in zadevne sektorje, naj odkrijejo primere neupoštevanja pravil in razloge za takšno vedenje ter storijo vse potrebno za zagotovitev večje skladnosti s to direktivo;
Welcomes the progress made in connection with compliance with the rearing requirements for pigs, even though there are still cases of non-compliance; is concerned, however, that, despite recommendations by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) in this regard, workable plans are still lacking as regards the implementation of individual provisions of Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs, and calls, therefore, on the Commission, the Member States and the sectors involved to identify cases of non-compliance and the reasons for such behaviour, and make the necessary efforts to ensure greater compliance with this Directive;
poleg tega Komisijo odločno poziva, naj zagotovi, da se bo v državah članicah pravočasno izvajala prepoved neurejenih kletk brez gnezd za kokoši nesnice, ki začne veljati leta 2012, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj storijo vse potrebno za zagotovitev, da bo lahko sektor izpolnil te obveznosti, ter spremljajo izvajanje v državah članicah; vztraja, da morajo za jajca, uvožena v EU, veljati isti proizvodni pogoji kakor za jajca domačih proizvajalcev;
Urges the Commission likewise to ensure that the ban on systems lacking cages with nests for laying hens, which enters into force in 2012, is fully complied with, and calls on the Commission and Member States to introduce the necessary measures to make sure that the sector is able to comply with this obligation and to monitor the process of implementation in the Member States; maintains that imports of eggs into the EU must likewise comply with the production conditions imposed on European producers;
poziva k prepovedi trženja jajc, ki niso skladna z zakonodajo, v vsej EU;
Calls for an EU-wide trade ban on eggs that do not comply with the law;
ugotavlja, da je izvajanje obstoječega akcijskega načrta neustrezno v več ozirih, in poudarja, da je treba pred uvedbo novih predpisov ustrezno izvajati že obstoječe; v zvezi s tem opozarja, da je pomembno imeti učinkovite kazni za neupoštevanje predpisov v vseh državah članicah;
Concludes that the implementation of the current action plan is inadequate in a number of respects and stresses the need to enforce existing rules before drawing up new ones; draws attention in that connection to the importance of effective penalties for non-compliance in all Member States;
poudarja, da mora ocena, ki jo mora Komisija opraviti v letu 2010, vsebovati temeljito analizo dosežkov in novih spoznanj, ki izhajajo iz morebitnih pomanjkljivosti;
Stresses the need for the Commission's own evaluation exercise, to be undertaken in 2010, to include a thorough analysis of achievements and of the lessons to be learned from potential flaws;
obžaluje, da Komisija v zadnjih letih ni oblikovala jasne strategije obveščanja o vrednosti proizvodnje, ki je v skladu s standardi dobrega počutja živali, temveč se je omejila zgolj na poročilo, ki ga je predložila oktobra 2009;
Regrets that the Commission has not, during this period, developed a clear communication strategy on the value of products that comply with animal welfare standards, contenting itself with the report presented in October 2009;
ugotavlja, da Skupnost obravnava vse živali kot čuteča bitja (člen 13 Pogodbe); ugotavlja, da so se torej dejavnosti doslej vse preveč osredotočale na živali za proizvodnjo hrane ter da je treba v akcijski načrt 2011–2015 vključiti tudi druge kategorije živali;
Acknowledges that the Community regards all animals as sentient beings (Article 13 of the Treaty); recognises that action has thus far predominantly focused on food-producing animals and that there is a need to bring other categories of animals into the Action Plan 2011 – 2015;
Akcijski načrt za obdobje 2011–2015
Action plan for 2011-2015
opominja, da je že v omenjeni resoluciji iz leta 2006 zahteval, naj sedanjemu akcijskemu načrtu sledi nov načrt, ter zato odločno poziva Komisijo, naj – na podlagi novih znanstvenih spoznanj in izkušenj – predloži poročilo, ki bo vsebovalo oceno izvajanja veljavnega načrta ter stanje politike za dobro počutje živali v EU in na podlagi katerega bo izdelala akcijski načrt za zaščito živali za obdobje 2011–2015, podprt s potrebnimi finančnimi sredstvi;
Recalls that its above-mentioned resolution of 2006 already called for the existing action plan to be followed by a new one, and urges the Commission therefore to submit – based on new scientific evidence and experience – a report assessing the implementation of the current plan and the situation concerning animal welfare policy in the EU, on the basis of which it should compile the action plan for animal welfare 2011-2015 backed by the required funding;
poziva, naj se z ukrepi zagotovi uveljavitev obstoječe zakonodaje brez nepotrebnega odlašanja ter naj se zagotovi uskladitev standardov in enaki pogoji na notranjem trgu; priporoča, naj se ob vsakem predlogu nove zakonodaje preučijo možnosti polnega izvajanja obstoječe zakonodaje, da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu podvajanju;
Calls for measures to be taken to ensure that existing legislation is enforced without delay and to secure the harmonisation of standards and a level playing-field within the internal market; recommends that any proposals for new legislation be assessed against the alternative course of fully implementing existing legislation, to avoid unnecessary duplication;
predlaga Komisiji, naj v svojem ocenjevalnem poročilu med drugim razišče, koliko je sedanji akcijski načrt izpolnil zahteve naše družbe po dobrem počutju živali in vzdržnosti sistema za naše proizvajalce ter kako je njegovo izvajanje vplivalo na delovanje notranjega trga;
Suggests to the Commission that, in its assessment report, it analyse inter alia the extent to which the current action plan has met the demands of European society in the area of animal welfare, the sustainability of the system for European producers, and how the functioning of the internal market has been affected since the implementation of this plan;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi učinke standardov za dobro počutje živali ter naj v celoti upošteva medsebojne vplive različnih dejavnikov, kot so dobro počutje živali, trajnost, zdravstveno varstvo živali, okolje, kakovost proizvodov in gospodarnost;
Calls on the Commission to demonstrate the impact of animal welfare standards and to take full account of the way different factors, such as animal welfare, sustainability, animal health, the environment, product quality and economic viability, interrelate;
Splošna evropska zakonodaja za dobro počutje živali
A general European animal welfare law
ugotavlja, da člen 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije prinaša nov pravni položaj, po katerem morajo Unija in države članice pri oblikovanju in izvajanju politik Skupnosti na področju kmetijstva, ribištva, prometa, notranjega trga, raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja ter vesolja v celoti upoštevati zahteve po dobrem počutju živali kot čutečih bitij, pri čemer morajo spoštovati zakonodajne ali upravne določbe in ustaljene običaje držav članic, zlasti glede verskih obredov, kulturnih tradicij in regionalne dediščine; meni, da omenjeni člen velja za vse proizvodne živali in živali v ujetništvu, kot so živali, namenjene prehrani, hišne živali, cirkuške živali in živali v živalskih vrtovih ali potepuške živali, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da različne lastnosti in življenjski pogoji zahtevajo različno obravnavo;
Observes that Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has created a new legal situation under which, when formulating and implementing Union policy in the fields of agriculture, fisheries, transport, the internal market, research and technological development and space, the Union and Member States must, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals, while respecting the legislative or administrative provisions and customs of the Member States relating in particular to religious rites, cultural traditions and regional heritage; considers that this article applies to all livestock and animals in captivity, such as food-producing animals, pets, circus animals and animals in zoos or stray animals, whilst bearing in mind that differing characteristics and living conditions require differentiated treatment;
poziva Komisijo, naj z ozirom na člen 13 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi študije vplivov in po posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi najpozneje do leta 2014 poda utemeljen predlog splošne zakonodaje EU za dobro počutje živali, ki bo na podlagi znanstvenih spoznanj in izkušenj, ki so na voljo, prispevala k enotnemu pojmovanju dobrega počutja živali, s tem povezanih stroškov in veljavnih temeljnih določb;
Calls on the Commission, in the light of Article 13 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to submit, no later than 2014 and on the basis of an impact study and after consulting stakeholders, a reasoned proposal for general animal welfare legislation for the EU, which, on the basis of the available science and proven experience, should contribute to a common understanding of the concept of animal welfare, the associated costs and the fundamental conditions applicable;
meni, da mora ta splošna zakonodaja za dobro počutje živali v skladu z zakonodajo o zdravstvenem varstvu živali vsebovati ustrezne smernice za odgovorno rejo živali, enoten sistem nadzora in zbiranja primerljivih podatkov ter zahteve o usposabljanju oseb, ki ravnajo z živalmi, in določbe o specifičnih odgovornostih lastnikov, rejcev oziroma skrbnikov živali; meni, da bi morale vse te zahteve spremljati določbe o virih, zagotovljenih proizvajalcem, da bi zagotovili njihovo pravilno izvajanje;
Considers that this general animal welfare legislation must include, in accordance with animal health law, suitable guidelines on responsible keeping of animals, a uniform system for monitoring and for gathering comparable data, as well as requirements relating to the training of animal handlers and provisions establishing the particular responsibilities of animal owners , farmers and keepers; considers that all these requirements should go hand in hand with the provision of resources to producers in order to ensure that they are properly implemented;
meni, da bi bilo treba v evropski zakonodaji o dobrem počutju živali določiti enotno osnovno raven dobrega počutja živali v Evropski uniji, kar je predpogoj za svobodno in pošteno konkurenco na notranjem trgu za domače proizvode in proizvode, uvožene iz tretjih držav; meni pa, da bi morale imeti regije in države članice možnost, da posameznim proizvajalcem ali skupinam proizvajalcev dovolijo prostovoljno vzpostavitev daljnosežnejših sistemov brez izkrivljanja konkurence in ob ohranjanju konkurenčnosti EU na mednarodnih trgih;
Considers that European animal welfare legislation should establish a common basic level of animal welfare in the European Union, which is the precondition for free and equitable competition within the internal market for both domestic products and third-country imports; considers, however, that Member States and regions should have the possibility to allow individual producers or groups of producers to introduce voluntary systems which are more far-reaching while avoiding distortion of competition and safeguarding the EU's competitiveness on international markets;
meni, da morajo uvoženi proizvodi izpolnjevati enake standarde dobrega počutja živali, kot veljajo za evropske izvajalce;
Considers that imported products must comply with the same animal welfare requirements as those imposed on European operators;
poziva, naj se evropskim kmetom povrnejo višji proizvodni stroški, ki so povezani z višjimi standardi dobrega počutja živali; predlaga, naj se financiranje ukrepov za dobro počutje živali vključi v nove programe podpore v okviru skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013;
Calls for European farmers to be compensated for the higher production costs associated with higher animal welfare standards; suggests that financing for animal welfare measures be incorporated into the new common agricultural policy support schemes from 2013;
meni tudi, da mora biti obveščanje državljanov o visoki stopnji dobrega počutja živali v EU in prizadevanjih različnih zadevnih sektorjev bistvena sestavina te politike;
Considers also that information to citizens on the high level of animal welfare in the EU and on the efforts made by the various sectors involved should be a key element in this policy;
meni, da je vključitev zahtev glede dobrega počutja živali v mednarodne sporazume nujna, da se našim proizvajalcem omogoči konkurenčnost na globaliziranem trgu in prepreči selitev proizvodnje na območja, kjer so ravni dobrega počutja živali bistveno nižje in zato nepošteno konkurirajo našemu modelu;
Considers that the inclusion of animal welfare requirements in international agreements is essential in order to allow our producers to compete in a globalised market and prevent the relocation of production to regions which have much lower levels of animal welfare and thus compete unfairly with our model;
pozdravlja razpravo o različnih možnih sistemih označevanja v zvezi z dobrim počutjem živali iz omenjenega poročila Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009; vendar opozarja, da je te možnosti treba obravnavati v širšem kontekstu, zlasti ob upoštevanju različnih sistemov označevanja na podlagi okoljskih, prehrambenih in podnebnih meril; poudarja, da mora obveščanje evropskih potrošnikov na tem področju temeljiti na neizpodbitnih in usklajenih znanstvenih dognanjih ter da morajo biti informacije berljive potrošnikom,
Welcomes the debate concerning various possible animal welfare labelling schemes in the aforementioned Commission communication of 28 October 2009; recalls, however, the need to consider them in a wider context, taking account, in particular, of the various existing environmental, nutritional and climate labelling schemes; stresses that information on the subject for European consumers absolutely must have a sound and consensual scientific basis and be clear to consumers;
priporoča, naj bodo informacije na etiketi natančne in jasne ter naj opozarjajo na skladnost z visokimi standardi, ki jih EU zahteva glede dobrega počutja živali; trdi, da bi morala Komisija poskrbeti, da so državljanom na voljo potrebne informacije o evropskem sistemu za dobro počutje živali in se tako zagotovijo objektivne informacije;
Recommends that the information given on the label should be precise and direct and should make reference to compliance with the high animal welfare standards demanded by the EU; maintains that it should be the task of the Commission to provide citizens with the necessary information on the European animal welfare system, so as to ensure that they receive objective information;
priporoča, da se pregleda skladnost politike o dobrem počutju živali z drugimi politikami EU;
Recommends that a review be conducted of the consistency of animal welfare policy with the Union's other policies;
poziva Komisijo, naj opravi podrobno oceno morebitnih težav s konkurenčnostjo, ki bi jih lahko evropski standardi dobrega počutja živali povzročali našim proizvajalcem, ter naj pregleda sisteme podpor za proizvajalce, povezane z izvajanjem teh predpisov;
Calls on the Commission to carry out a thorough assessment of the possible problems that European animal welfare standards cause for the competitiveness of our producers and to review the support systems for producers relating to the implementation of these standards;
meni, da bi bilo treba pred oblikovanjem vsake nove zakonodaje najprej zagotoviti dobro izvajanje obstoječih splošnih in posebnih predpisov; kot primer navaja prepoved neurejenih kletk brez gnezd za kokoši, predpise o prašičih in predpise o prevozu živali ter o vzreji gosi in rac; poudarja, da bi bilo treba nadaljnje ukrepe za dobro počutje živali uskladiti z drugimi cilji Skupnosti, kot so trajnostni razvoj, zlasti trajnostna živinoreja, varovanje okolja in biotske raznovrstnosti, strategija za boljše izvajanje obstoječe zakonodaje in skladna strategija za pospešitev napredka v smeri raziskav brez poskusov na živalih;
Considers that, before any new legislation is drafted, existing rules – whether general or specific – should be enforced properly; points, by way of examples, to the ban on battery cages for hens, the rules on pigs and the rules on animal transport and the rearing of geese and ducks; stresses that further animal welfare measures should be brought into line with other Community objectives such as sustainable development, in particular sustainable livestock production and consumption, protection of the environment and biodiversity, a strategy to improve the enforcement of existing legislation, and a coherent strategy to speed up progress towards non-animal research;