natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker pristop držav zahodnega Balkana, če jih obravnavamo posamično, zaradi njihove velikosti, števila prebivalstva in gospodarske razvitosti, tudi v okviru veljavnega finančnega okvira ne bi povzročil nobenih statističnih učinkov na upravičenost regij v državah članicah, niti ne bi vodil v drastične finančne učinke na kohezijsko politiko v sedanji Uniji s 27 državami članicami; ker bi Hrvaška, s katero so pogajanja najbolj napredovala in je z družbeno–gospodarskega vidika celo bolj razvita od nekaterih sedanjih držav članic, primerjalno gledano predstavljala najmanjše finančno breme za Unijo, glede na velikost, število prebivalstva in raven gospodarske razvitosti države ter ne bi imela nobenega statističnega učinka v zvezi z upravičenostjo območij na regionalni in nacionalni ravni, celo v sedanjem finančnem obdobju,
whereas the accession of the Western Balkan states taken individually, even during the current financial framework, would not give rise to any statistical effect on the eligibility of Member State regions, nor would it lead to any dramatic financial impact on the cohesion policy of the current Union of 27 Member States due to their size, population and economic development; whereas Croatia, with which negotiations are the furthest advanced and which is even more developed in socio-economic terms than some current Member States, would, in comparative terms, represent the smallest financial burden for the Union, given the country's size, population and level of economic development and would not give rise to any statistical effect in relation to the eligible areas at regional and national level, even in the current financial period,
ker je bilo v sklepih predsedstva Evropskega sveta junija 2006 poudarjeno, da bi morala EU pri sprejemanju novih držav članic ostati sposobna ohranjati dinamiko evropskega povezovanja ter "da bi bilo treba storiti vse, da se zaščiti kohezija in učinkovitost Unije",
whereas, the Presidency Conclusions of the June 2006 European Council pointed out that, in accepting new Member States, the EU should remain in a position to maintain the dynamic of European integration and 'that every effort should be made to protect the cohesion and the effectiveness of the Union',
ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 8. novembra 2006 poziva, naj se pred kakršno koli nadaljnjo širitvijo podrobno preučijo učinki na proračun EU, pri čemer se upošteva prihodnji razvoj pomembnejših političnih področij, kot sta kmetijstvo in kohezijska politika,
whereas, in its Communication of 8 November 2006, the Commission calls for the effects on the EU budget to be examined in detail ahead of any further enlargements, taking into account the future development of relevant policy areas such as agriculture and cohesion policy,
ker bo o regionalni politiki, ki predstavlja eno največjih proračunskih postavk EU, potekala še posebej temeljita razprava – nenazadnje v zvezi z merili učinkovitosti – pri reviziji finančnega okvira EU, ki je predvidena za 2008–2009,
whereas regional policy, as one of the largest EU budget items, will come under particularly intensive discussion – not least with reference to efficiency criteria – in the review of the EU financial framework scheduled for 2008-2009,
ker je v Uniji, ki se še vedno širi, bolj kot kadarkoli potrebna učinkovitost politik Skupnosti, saj sta učinkovitost kohezijske politike in njena že dokazana dejanska dodana vrednost v veliki meri odvisni od razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev; ker bi bilo zato treba posvetiti kar največjo pozornost reviziji sistema virov lastnih sredstev Skupnosti,
whereas, in a still enlarging Union, the efficiency of Community policies is needed more than ever, the effectiveness of cohesion policy and its demonstrated genuine added-value being heavily dependent on the financial resources available; whereas, therefore, the utmost attention should be paid to the review of the Community's system of own resources,
meni, da sposobnost Evropske unije za sprejemanje novih članic pomeni zlasti, da mora biti sposobna, glede na proračunske danosti, zasledovati cilj socialne, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije; zato meni, da se je treba ob pristopu vsake države kandidatke odločiti, ali je EU to državo sposobna integrirati;
Considers that the integration capacity of the European Union means in particular that it must be in a position, in the light of budgetary realities, to pursue the objective of social, economic and territorial cohesion; considers therefore that it is necessary at the time of the accession of every candidate country to decide whether the EU is capable of integrating the state in question;
meni, da je institucionalna, finančna in politična reforma potrebna tudi v zvezi z revizijo finančnega okvira EU; s tem v povezavi meni, da bi bilo treba primerjati učinke različnih pomembnejših instrumentov financiranja (Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj, Evropski socialni sklad, Kohezijski sklad, Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja) na razvoj EU–27 in s tem omogočiti sprejemanje ustreznih proračunskih odločitev;
Considers that institutional, financial and political reform is also necessary in the context of a review of the EU's financial framework; in this connection, believes that a comparison should be made between the effects of the various main funding instruments (European Regional Development Fund, European Social Fund, Cohesion Fund, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development) on the development of EU-27, thus enabling appropriate budgetary decisions to be taken;
meni, da prihodnje širitve ne smejo voditi v to, da vedno večje število regij ne bo več upravičeno do sredstev iz kohezijske politike v okviru veljavnega cilja 1 zaradi statističnega učinka in ne da bi se obstoječa neskladja dejansko odpravila;
Considers that future enlargements must not lead to ever more regions ceasing to be eligible for cohesion policy funding under the current Objective 1 as a result of the statistical effect and without existing disparities really being eliminated;
poudarja, da je poštena in učinkovita kohezijska politika nemogoča brez povečanja porabe EU na 1,18 % BND EU, kot je Parlament izjavil v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. junija 2005 o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007–2013 UL C 124 E, 25.5.2006, str.
Stresses that an honest and efficient cohesion policy is impossible without an increase in EU spending to 1,18 % of EU GNI, as was stated by Parliament in its resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 OJ C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p.
zato obžaluje, da Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 8. novembra 2006 o širitveni strategiji ni predložila nobene poglobljene analize finančnih posledic prihodnjih širitev;
Regrets, therefore, that, in its Communication of 8 November 2006 on Enlargement Strategy, the Commission does not offer any in-depth analysis of the financial consequences of future enlargements;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi natančno analizo učinka, da se lahko ustrezno predvidijo vse posledice pristopa Romunije in Bolgarije za strukturno politiko;
Calls on the Commission to present a detailed impact analysis in order to enable a proper forecast to be made of the full effects on structural policy of the accession of Romania and Bulgaria;
poziva Komisijo tudi, naj v zvezi s prihodnjimi širitvami redno izračunava, tako da prikaže ločene zneske za vsako državo, kakšni bi utegnili biti izdatki EU za regionalno politiko – pri čemer uporabi veljavna ter spremenjena in razširjena merila – ter kakšne bi bile posledice tega za dosedanjo upravičenost regij do pomoči; s tem v povezavi ugotavlja, da bi bilo mogoče uporabiti tudi zbirke podatkov in analitične instrumente Evropskega omrežja za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON); meni, da bi bilo treba pozornost posvetiti tudi izboljšanju povezovanja različnih instrumentov EU za financiranje;
Calls also on the Commission, in connection with forthcoming enlargements, regularly to calculate, showing separate figures for each state, the regional policy expenditure which the EU would be likely to incur, using the current as well as the amended and extended criteria, and what consequences this would have on the existing eligibility for funding of the regions; in this respect, notes that the databases and analytical instruments of the European Spatial Planning Observation Network (ESPON) could also be used; believes that consideration should also be given to improving the integration of the various EU funding instruments;
meni, da obstaja potreba po študijah, ki temeljijo na izkušnjah, pridobljenih s preteklimi širitvami, in vključujejo družbeno-gospodarske izboljšave, do katerih bo prišlo v tokratnem programskem obdobju, da se razvijejo scenariji za prihodnje financiranje kohezijske politike EU;
Considers that there is a need for ongoing studies that are based on experience gained with previous enlargements and that include the socio-economic improvements that will take place during the current programming period, in order to develop scenarios for the future financing of EU cohesion policy;
poudarja pomen zelo strogega pristopa pri količinskem in kakovostnem ocenjevanju rabe strukturnih skladov, kar naj ima za posledico dobro upravljanje in ustrezen nadzor, da se v korist državljanov Unije optimizira razmerje med stroški in koristmi pri izdatkih EU za kohezijo;
Stresses the importance of a very strict approach in terms of quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the use of the Structural Funds entailing sound management and appropriate monitoring in order, in the interests of Union citizens, to optimise the cost-benefit ratio of the EU's cohesion expenditure;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svojem prihodnjem, četrtem kohezijskem poročilu poglavje nameni svojemu pogledu na vzdržnost sedanje kohezijske politike in prihodnjim ukrepom, ki bi lahko, kjer je to primerno, učinkovali na kohezijsko politiko;
Calls on the Commission to devote a chapter in its forthcoming Fourth cohesion report to its view of the sustainability of current cohesion policy and to the future measures that might, where appropriate, impact on cohesion policy;
meni, da bi bilo glede na trenutno stanje sistema virov EU težko financirati kakršne koli prihodnje širitve, ne da bi pri tem ogrozili učinkovitost sedanjih kohezijskih politik;
Considers that, in view of the current state of the EU's resources system, it would be difficult to finance future enlargements without jeopardising the effectiveness of current cohesion policies;
nujno poziva Komisijo, naj objavi sporočilo, v katerem določi predlog postopnega modela kohezijske politike, ki bo omogočal nadaljnjo razlikovanje med predpristopno pomočjo in članstvom ter bo potencialnim kandidatkam za pristop, pred njihovim morebitnim članstvom v Evropski uniji, omogočil prejemanje učinkovite podpore za regionalni razvoj, ki bo odvisna od njihovega političnega napredka;
Urges the Commission to issue a communication setting out a proposal for a graduated model for cohesion policy, making it possible to draw a further distinction between pre-accession assistance and membership and enabling potential accession candidates to receive effective support for regional development, subject to their political progress, prior to possible membership of the European Union;
zlasti glede Turčije poziva k postopnemu pristopu, ki bo tesneje osredotočen na financiranje posebnih vsebinskih področij (kot so panožni grozdi, vzpostavljanje institucij in enakopravnost) ter regij, da bi se tako izognili nepremišljenemu sprejemanju običajnih finančnih ukrepov, povezanih s pristopom, ter dosegli bolj usmerjene učinke na koheziji in rasti;
Calls for a graduated approach to Turkey in particular, more closely focussed on the funding of specific thematic areas (such as industry clusters, institution-building and equality) and regions, so as to avoid the unthinking adoption of the usual accession-related financial measures and achieve more targeted effects on cohesion and growth;
prosi, da se postopek soodločanja uporablja za oceno in reformo predpristopne pomoči po letu 2010;
Asks for the co-decision procedure to apply to the evaluation and reform of pre-accession assistance from 2010 onwards;
poziva Komisijo, naj natančneje opredeli, kaj misli z "okrepitvijo sosedske politike" , in naj s tem v zvezi posveti tudi več pozornosti instrumentom za strukturno financiranje;
Calls on the Commission to define in more detail what it means by 'reinforcing the neighbourhood policy', and in this context to give more thought to structural funding instruments;
meni, da je treba za uspešnost kohezijske politike v prihodnje nujno okrepiti lastno odgovornost držav članic;
Considers it essential for the effectiveness of cohesion policy that the individual responsibility of the Member States should be increased in the future;
v zvezi z razpravo o prihodnosti kohezijske politike predlaga, da bi morala EU pri financiranju posojil v večji meri uporabljati učinek vzvoda, – zlasti v regijah, ki so že več let prejemale sredstva EU – da izboljša učinkovitost podpore Skupnosti, vendar ne da bi se ta pomoč tako nadomestila;
Proposes, in the context of the debate on future cohesion policy, that the EU should make greater use of the leverage effect of loan financing − particularly in regions that have already received EU funding for many years − in order to improve the effectiveness of Community support, albeit without replacing it;
s tem v zvezi meni, da bi bilo treba določiti ugodnejše pogoje za financiranje posojil in subvencij za najmanj razvite regije EU;
Considers in this connection that more favourable conditions should be set for the financing of loans and grants for the least developed regions of the EU;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za prihodnjo kohezijsko politiko, ki bo bolj po meri dejanskih potreb regij, saj so regije, ki že 10, 20 ali 30 let prejemajo pomoč iz skladov EU, očitno dosegle drugačno raven razvitosti kot tiste regije, ki še niso prejele nikakršnega financiranja; meni, da je večje razlikovanje lahko odgovor za prihodnje izzive, s katerimi bo soočena kohezijska politika EU;
Calls on the Commission to devise proposals for a future cohesion policy tailored more closely to the actual needs of the regions, since regions which have been receiving aid from EU funds for 10, 20 or 30 years have clearly achieved a different level of development than those which have not yet received any funding; believes that greater differentiation may possibly be the answer to the future challenges facing EU cohesion policy;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da je v nekaterih regijah pomoč EU slabo usmerjena, posledica tega pa je, da se razmere v teh regijah navkljub večletni finančni podpori ne izboljšujejo, kar pomeni, da se zapravljajo sredstva Skupnosti;
Expresses concern at the fact that in some regions EU aid is poorly targeted, as a result of which the situation in those regions is failing to improve despite many years of financial support, meaning that Community resources are being wasted;
poziva, da se kot vir sofinanciranja strukturnih sredstev bolj uporabljajo zasebna sredstva ter da se v skladu z najboljšimi praksami znatno poenostavi zasebno sofinanciranje projektov in programov iz strukturnih skladov;
Calls for more use to be made of private funds as a source of co-financing structural funding, and for the private co-financing of projects and programmes under the Structural Funds to be significantly simplified in line with best practice;
poziva, naj bodo strukturna sredstva v prihodnje naravnana tako, da se preprečijo učinki premeščanja pa tudi financiranje EU za podjetja, ki se selijo, ter meni, da mora Komisija, v povezavi s kohezijsko politiko, kritično preveriti, ali so subvencije, ki se namenjajo podjetjem, učinkovite pri vplivanju na poslovne odločitve o lokaciji, pri čemer se upošteva velikost zadevnih podjetij;
Calls for future structural funding to be geared so as to avoid displacement effects as well as the EU funding of company relocations, and considers that the Commission must look critically, in the context of cohesion policy, at whether subsidies given to firms are effective in influencing business decisions regarding location, taking into account the size of the firms in question;
ugotavlja, da je uspeh kohezijske politike povezan z nacionalnimi gospodarskimi politikami in da s tem v zvezi izvajanje nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za Lizbonsko strategijo še posebej vpliva na uspeh kohezijske politike;
Notes that the success of cohesion policy is linked to national economic policies and that in this connection the implementation of the National Action Plans for the Lisbon Strategy has a particular influence on the success of cohesion policy;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se v okviru prihodnjih programov za regionalno konkurenčnost in za ozemeljsko sodelovanje financiranje tesneje osredotoči na evropeizacijo regionalnega gospodarstva in na infrastrukturo evropskega pomena;
Urges the Commission to ensure that, in the framework of future programmes for regional competitiveness and for territorial cooperation, funding is concentrated more closely on the Europeanisation of the regional economy and on infrastructures of European importance;
poziva, naj se v prihodnje strukturne sklade več uporablja za ublažitev učinkov demografskih sprememb in posledičnega regionalnega preseljevanja;
Calls for greater use to be made of the Structural Funds in future in order to cushion the effects of demographic change and resulting regional migration;
meni, da bi morali v prihodnje Evropski socialni sklad v še večji meri uporabljati kot horizontalen inštrument, med drugim tudi za pomoč regijam pri soočanju z družbenimi izzivi globalizacije, pa tudi z učinki demografskih sprememb;
Considers that greater use should be made in future of the European Social Fund as a horizontal instrument, among other things, to help regions cope with the social challenges of globalisation as well as the effects of demographic change;
poudarja, da je rezultate kohezijske politike mogoče preveriti le, če dodeljevanje strukturnih sredstev poteka pregledno, in zato Evropsko unijo poziva k uvedbi zelo strogih meril za preglednost pri dodeljevanju sredstev;
Stresses that the results of cohesion policy can only be reviewed if the award of Structural Funds takes place in a transparent manner, and therefore calls for the European Union to employ very stringent transparency criteria for the award of funding;
poziva k strožjim sankcijam v primeru dokazane zlorabe sredstev ter k učinkovitejšim postopkom za povračilo sredstev;
Calls for tougher sanctions in the event of proven abuse of funding and more effective procedures for the recovery of funds;
ugotavlja, da so uspešni ukrepi za boj proti korupciji in vzpostavljanje upravnih zmogljivosti za učinkovito in pregledno izvajanje programov strukturnih skladov bistven predpogoj za prejemanje strukturnih sredstev; poziva k dosledni in nepopustljivi uporabi nadzornih instrumentov;
Notes that successful measures to combat corruption, and the building of administrative capacity to implement Structural Fund programmes efficiently and transparently, are crucial preconditions for the receipt of structural funding; calls for consistent and rigid application of the control instruments;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj vse te točke upoštevajo pri izvedbi vmesnega pregleda veljavnega finančnega okvira EU, ki je načrtovan za 2008-2009;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to consider all these points when conducting its mid-term review of the EU's current financial framework scheduled for 2008-2009;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in Odboru regij.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Committee of the Regions.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. aprila 2007 o letni strategiji politik Komisije za proračunski postopek 2008 ( 2007/2017(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 April 2007 on the Commission's annual policy strategy for the 2008 budget procedure ( 2007/2017(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom "Letna strategija politik za leto 2008" ( KOM(2007)0065 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Annual Policy Strategy for 2008 ( COM(2007)0065 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0123/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on International Trade ( A6-0123/2007 ),
ker bo proračun EU za leto 2008 drugi proračun, določen v okviru Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju,
whereas the EU budget for 2008 will be the second to be agreed in the framework of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) on budgetary discipline and sound financial management agreed on 17 May 2006,
ker bo proračun za leto 2008 prvi sprejeti proračun z Romunijo in Bolgarijo kot članicama EU,
whereas the 2008 budget will be the first to be agreed with Romania and Bulgaria as members of the EU,
ker postopek globalizacije hitro napreduje, z vsemi spremljajočimi gospodarskimi, socialnimi in okoljskimi priložnostmi ter izzivi, ker mora proračun 2008 zagotoviti, da bo EU še naprej zmožna izkoristiti priložnosti in se soočiti z izzivi globalizacije ter obvladovati svojo obveznost kot globalni akter z ustrezno kombinacijo dolgoročnih notranjih in zunanjih politik,
whereas the process of globalisation continues apace, with all of its attendant opportunities and challenges in the economic, social, and environmental spheres; whereas the 2008 budget must ensure that the EU continues to be in a position to benefit from the opportunities and meet the challenges of globalisation and to cope with its responsibility as a global actor through an appropriate mix of forward-looking internal and external policies,
ker bo leto 2007 prvo leto izvajanja več novih evropskih programov porabe za obdobje finančnega načrtovanja 2007–2013 po sprejetju številnih novih pravnih podlag v letu 2006; ker bodo podatki o izvajanju proračuna za leto 2007, zlasti v smislu odobritev za prevzem obveznosti, zagotovili pomembne informacije o zmožnosti Komisije in držav članic za izvajanje prednostnih nalog Parlamenta,
whereas 2007 will be the first year of implementation of many new EU spending programmes for the 2007 - 2013 financial programming period, following the adoption of many new legal bases during 2006; whereas data on implementation of the 2007 budget, particularly in terms of commitment appropriations, will provide important information as to the capacity of the Commission and the Member States to implement Parliament's priorities,
poudarja, kako pomembno je, da EU s sedemindvajsetimi državami članicami izkoristi globalizacijo v prid svojih državljanov in v mednarodnem merilu prevzame vodilno vlogo pri soočanju z izzivi globalizacije; s tem v zvezi poudarja pomen ustrezne porazdelitve finančnih in človeških virov EU za ustrezno delovanje EU;
Underlines the importance it attaches to the capacity of an EU of 27 members to make globalisation an opportunity for its citizens and to lead international action in meeting the challenges that globalisation presents; highlights, in this context, the importance of ensuring that the EU's financial and human resources are appropriately allocated so as to secure the proper functioning of the EU;