natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pristojnosti pa parlament ima s soodločanjem o 7. okvirnem raziskovalnem programu.
They call on the Commission and Council to acknowledge the effects of global warming on sub-Saharan Africa and act in Europe to mitigate those effects by adopting stringent CO2 reduction strategies at Union level.
"Pomembno področje tega programa je zdravje.
They consider that natural resource exploitation needs to be taken into account in trade negotiations with African countries.
Finančna sredstva, ki jih bomo usmerili za ta program, morajo odražati demografske kazalce in resnične potrebe naših državljank in državljanov.
Furthermore, Parliament calls for action to ensure that the cancellation of Niger's external debt announced at the G8 summit actually takes place and calls on the Commission to implement, once the emergency is over, a comprehensive policy for tackling the root causes of the crisis, in order to address the underlying structural causes and improve agricultural productivity in the region.
Tudi na ta način se lahko približamo ljudem, ki bodo dobili priložnost, da neposredno spoznajo, kako skupna evropska politika vpliva na kakovost njihovega življenja," je dejala poslanka Jordan Cizelj.
MEPs call on the governments of the region to implement a policy of sustainable development in the agricultural sector and on the UN General Assembly to define at its September 2005 session forms and instruments of international aid with a view to eradicating poverty and hunger in the world, pursuant to the millennium goals.
Poročilo je bilo sprejeto .
Intolerance since 1994.
Turizem in razvoj
Parliament calls on the Commission and the Council
Poročilo: Thierry CORNILLET (ALDE, FR) -
Syria told: free your political prisoners
Poslanci so poročilo sprejeli s 368 glasovi za, 81 proti in 17 vzdržanimi.
all charges against civil activists Hazan Zeino, Yassin al-Hamwi and
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-1887/04
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1887/04
predložil Christopher Huhne (ALDE)
by Christopher Huhne (ALDE)
Zadeva: Rast domačega povpraševanja
Subject: Domestic demand growth
Ali Komisija meni, da bo rast domačega povpraševanja v gospodarstvu območja evra samodejno dosegla osnovno rast proizvodnjega potenciala?
Does the Commission have a view on whether domestic demand growth in the eurozone economy is likely to rise to the underlying growth of productive potential of its own accord?
Če da, kateri mehanizmi so vključeni?
If so, what are the mechanisms involved?
Če ne, kaj je treba spremeniti v politiki, da bi se spodbudila rast domačega povpraševanja?
If not, what policy changes are required to boost domestic demand growth?
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-2724/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2724/06
predložil i Graham Watson (ALDE) , Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (ALDE) , Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck (ALDE) , Jelko Kacin (ALDE) , Cecilia Malmström (ALDE) , Lydie Polfer (ALDE) , István Szent-Iványi (ALDE) , Paavo Väyrynen (ALDE) , Anneli Jäätteenmäki (ALDE) , Sajjad Karim (ALDE) , Graf Alexander Lambsdorff (ALDE) , Janusz Onyszkiewicz (ALDE) , Marco Pannella (ALDE) , Lapo Pistelli (ALDE) , Frédérique Ries (ALDE) , Anders Samuelsen (ALDE) , Dirk Sterckx (ALDE) in Edward McMillan-Scott (PPE-DE)
by Graham Watson (ALDE) , Baroness Nicholson of Winterbourne (ALDE) , Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck (ALDE) , Jelko Kacin (ALDE) , Cecilia Malmström (ALDE) , Lydie Polfer (ALDE) , István Szent-Iványi (ALDE) , Paavo Väyrynen (ALDE) , Anneli Jäätteenmäki (ALDE) , Sajjad Karim (ALDE) , Graf Alexander Lambsdorff (ALDE) , Janusz Onyszkiewicz (ALDE) , Marco Pannella (ALDE) , Lapo Pistelli (ALDE) , Frédérique Ries (ALDE) , Anders Samuelsen (ALDE) , Dirk Sterckx (ALDE) and Edward McMillan-Scott (PPE‑DE)
(21. junij 2006)
(21 June 2006)
Zadeva: Zapor za pripadnike gibanja Falun Gong
Subject: Prison camp for Falun Gong practitioners
Je Komisija seznanjena s trditvami o obstoju kitajskega zapora v Siu Jia Tunu v provinci Šenjang za pripadnike gibanja Falun Gong, v katerem se zapornikom domnevno jemlje organe za prodajo?
Is the Commission aware of allegations of a Chinese prison camp for Falun Gong practitioners at Siu Jia Tun in Shenyang province, at which it is alleged that body organs are removed from prisoners for sale?
Bo Komisija načela to vprašanje z oblastmi v LR Kitajski in Evropskemu parlamentu poročala o svojih ugotovitvah?
Will the Commission raise these allegations with the PRC authorities and report to the European Parliament on its findings?
Ferrero-Waldner v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mrs Ferrero-Waldner on behalf of the Commission
Komisija je dobro seznanjena z obtožbami glede preprodaje organov zapornikov, obsojenih na smrt v nekaterih kitajskih taboriščih.
The Commission is well aware of the allegations of trafficking of organs of prisoners sentenced to death in certain Chinese camps.
Zaenkrat še ni našla nobenih stvarnih dokazov, ki bi potrjevali te obtožbe, in bo nadaljevala s preiskovanjem.
It has not found, at present, any concrete evidence in support of these allegations and will investigate further.
Če bodo te obtožbe potrjene, bo Komisija resno in na najustreznejši način načela to vprašanje s kitajskimi predstavniki.
Should these allegations be confirmed, the Commission would urgently raise the issue with its Chinese counterpart in the most appropriate manner.
Medtem pa se je EU resneje osredotočila na splošno prakso kitajskih oblasti glede pridobivanja organov za uporabo v medicinskih postopkih presaditve in je ocenila zadevo glede na ozadje novih kitajskih predpisov o presaditvah človeških organov, ki jih je izdalo ministrstvo za zdravje in ki so začeli veljati 1. julija 2006.
In the meantime, the EU has more strongly focused on the Chinese Government’s general practice of harvesting organs for use in medical transplant procedures and has assessed the issue against the background of the new Chinese regulation on human organ transplants issued by the Ministry of Health and which became effective on 1 July 2006.
Po mnenju EU se ta zakonodaja ne ukvarja v zadostni meri z vprašanjem privolitve darovalcev, še posebej tistih, ki so umrli v zaporu ali so bili usmrčeni.
In the EU’s opinion, this legislation does not adequately address the issue of donor consent, particularly for those who have died in custody or have been executed.
EU je svoje pomisleke že sporočila – in jih bo sporočala tudi v prihodnje – kitajskim oblastem, tako skozi dvostranski dialog o človekovih pravicah kot skozi širše politične poti, in je ob teh priložnostih poudarila, da bi bili potrebni boljša zakonodaja in kazenski zakoni za učinkovito preprečevanje zlorab.
The EU has made — and will continue to make — its concerns known to the Chinese government both through the bilateral dialogue on human rights and wider political channels and stressed at these occasions that better legislation and criminal law would be necessary to effectively ban misuse.
Primerno bi bilo tudi raziskati možnosti za pogovore med strokovnjaki o medicinskih in pravnih standardih glede človeških organov in darovanja tkiva ter presaditev.
It could also be opportune to explore ways allowing for an exchange by practitioners on medical and legal standards for human organs and tissue donation and transplantation.
Komisija bo zadevo pozorno spremljala in s tem skušala zagotoviti, da bodo vsa darovanja organov uradno odobrena s strani darovalcev.
The Commission will closely follow this matter with a view to assuring that any donation of organs be subject to a formal consent of the donor.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-2725/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2725/06
Je Svet seznanjen s trditvami o obstoju kitajskega zapora v Siu Jia Tunu v provinci Šenjang za pripadnike gibanja Falun Gong, v katerem se zapornikom domnevno jemlje organe za prodajo?
Is the Council aware of allegations of a Chinese prison camp for Falun Gong practitioners at Siu Jia Tun in Shenyang province, at which it is alleged that body organs are removed from prisoners for sale?
Bo Svet načel to vprašanje z oblastmi v LR Kitajski in Evropskemu parlamentu poročal o svojih ugotovitvah?
Will the Council raise these allegations with the PRC authorities and report to the European Parliament on its findings?
Špidle v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Špidla on behalf of the Commission
Komisija je bila obveščena o sklepu slovenskega Ministrstva za delo, družino in socialne zadeve, da ministrstvo v okviru poziva k oddaji predlogov za projekte, ki ga je objavilo, ne bo odobrilo sredstev za projekt, ki ga je predložila nevladna organizacija, dejavna na področju boja proti diskriminaciji zaradi spolne usmerjenosti.
The Commission has been made aware of a decision by the Slovenian Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Affairs not to allocate funds under a call for project proposals run by this Ministry to a project put forward by a non-governmental organisation (NGO) active in the field of combating discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.
Komisija je bila tudi obveščena, da ministrstvo v navedenem sklepu navaja kot enega izmed razlogov za zavrnitev tega projekta, da so bila za isto področje politike odobrena znatna sredstva v okviru projekta EQUAL, ki ga vodi druga organizacija.
The Commission has also been made aware that the Ministry, in the abovementioned decision, mentions as one of the grounds for not accepting the project that substantial funds are granted to an EQUAL project in the same policy field, run by a different organisation.
Prvič, Komisija poudarja, da programa, v okviru katerega je bil objavljen ta poziv k oddaji predlogov, ne sofinancira Evropska unija.
Firstly, the Commission underlines that the programme under which this call for proposals was launched is not co-financed by the European Union.
Drugič, Komisija ni bila obveščena o tem, da bi bila zaradi tega odtegnjena vladna sredstva, namenjena drugim organizacijam, ki zastopajo lezbijke, geje ter transseksualne in biseksualne osebe.
Secondly, the Commission is not aware that government funding is withheld, on the same ground, for other organisations representing lesbian, gay, transgender and bisexual people.
Komisija nima na voljo statističnih podatkov, ki omogočajo primerjavo zneskov, odobrenih v Sloveniji za dejavnosti na področju boja proti diskriminaciji zaradi spolne usmerjenosti.
The Commission does not avail of statistics allowing a comparison of amounts granted to activities in the field of combating discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation in Slovenia.
Komisija ne more ugotoviti, ali so finančna sredstva Skupnosti, ki so namenjena takim dejavnostim, dodatna sredstva ali pa nadomestek za sredstva, ki jih je Slovenija prej odobrila za take dejavnosti.
The Commission can not establish whether Community financing for such activities is additional to, or substitutes, financing formerly granted by Slovenia for such activities.
V vsakem primeru načelo dodatnosti iz Uredbe o strukturnih skladih Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1260/1999 z dne 21.6.1999 o splošnih določbah za strukturne sklade, UL L 161, 26.6.1999 . ne pomeni zahteve po „dodatnosti“ za posamezna področja politik, kot je boj proti diskriminaciji zaradi spolne usmerjenosti.
In any case, the additionality principle under the Structural Funds Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds, OJ L 161, 26.6.1999. does not require ‘additionality’ for specific policy fields such as the fight against discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation.
Komisija se ne more vmešavati v nacionalne postopke za izbiro projektov.
The Commission is not in a position to interfere in national procedures for the selection of projects.
Glede bolj splošnega vprašanja spodbujanja enakih možnosti in različnosti je spoštovanim poslancem znano, da je bilo leto 2007 razglašeno za evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse.
With regard to the more general question of promotion of equal opportunities and diversity, the Honourable Members will recall that 2007 has been designated the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All.
V okviru tega evropskega leta so na razpolago sredstva za dejavnosti na nacionalni ravni, ki bi morale obravnavati diskriminacijo zaradi razlogov, ki so na ravni EU prepovedani – spola, rasne ali etnične pripadnosti, vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti.
In the context of the Year, there is funding available for activities at national level which should deal with discrimination on grounds banned at EU level — sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, handicap, age and sexual orientation.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-4557/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-4557/06
predložili Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE-DE) in Edit Herczog (PSE)
by Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE‑DE) and Edit Herczog (PSE)
Zadeva: Stabilnost v balkanski regiji
Subject: Stability in the Balkan Region
Predhodno, sedanje in prihodnje predsedstvo Sveta se upravičeno strinjajo, da so energija, okolje in odvisnost od uvoza prednostna vprašanja za EU.
Past, current and future Council Presidencies rightly agree that energy, environment and external dependency are high priority issues for the EU.
Evropski parlament kot celota (Van Ordenovo poročilo o članstvu Bolgarije ( A6-0078/2005 )), Odbor za zunanje zadeve in posamezniki (Eija-Riitta Korhola, vprašanje Komisiji E-2421/05 junija 2005) so zahtevali, naj se sporazum o zaprtju štirih od skupaj šestih blokov bolgarske jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj razume z nekaj prožnosti.
The European Parliament as a whole (Van Orden Report on Bulgaria’s Accession ( A6-0078/2005 )), in the Foreign Affairs Committee, and individually (Eija-Riitta Korhola Question E‑2421/05 to the Commission, June 2005) have asked for the agreement to close four out of six units at Bulgaria’s Kozloduy Plant to be treated with some flexibility.
Za zaprtje blokov 3 in 4 v Kozloduju je določen datum 31. december 2006, ko je povpraševanje po elektriki v regiji največje.
Kozloduy Units 3 and 4 are set to close on 31 December 2006, just as the regional electricity demand is at its peak.
Bolgarija sedaj izvaža električno energijo v vse sosednje države.
Bulgaria currently exports electricity to all its neighbours.
Celo če se proizvodnja energije deloma nadomesti v elektrarnah na lignit, ki zelo onesnažujejo okolje, se izpadom električne energije ne bo mogoče izogniti.
Even allowing for limited replacement generation by highly polluting lignite plants, power cuts in the region are certain.
Glede na to, da so skupina Sveta za jedrska vprašanja in drugi pozitivno ocenili varnost te elektrarne, prosimo Svet, naj bolgarsko vlado pozove, da zaprtje odloži za 8 mesecev, ko je povpraševanje precej manjše.
Bearing in mind that the Council’s Atomic Questions Group and others have commented favourably on the safety of this plant, would the Council please ask the Government of Bulgaria to delay that closure by eight months, when the demand will be much lower.
V tem času je mogoče zaprtje presoditi po sedanjih regionalnih, okoljskih, socialnih in ekonomskih merilih ter merilih odvisnosti od uvoza energije, pa tudi realno oceniti potencialno, novo čisto proizvodnjo energije v prihodnjih nekaj letih.
The intervening time could be used to review the closure against current regional, environmental and external energy dependency, social and economic criteria and a realistic assessment of potential new clean generation in the next few years.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-5141/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5141/06
predložila Ljudmila Novak (PPE-DE)
by Ljudmila Novak (PPE‑DE)
Zadeva: Vprašanje o plačilu ekspertov
Subject: Payments to experts
Komisijo prosimo za pojasnilo, ali agencije, ki jih financirajo direktorati Komisije, enakopravno obravnavajo, vključujejo in plačujejo eksperte iz novih (10) držav članic in eksperte iz starih (15) članic.
Do agencies financed by Commission directorates treat, include and pay experts from the 10 new Member States and the 15 old Member States on an equal basis?
Če je izbira, obravnava ali plačevanje ekspertov različno, prosimo za pojasnilo in za pravno podlago za takšno ravnanje.
If there are any differences in the selection, treatment or payment of experts, could the Commission please provide an explanation and specify the legal basis for such differences.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-5562/06
WRITTEN QUESTION E-5562/06
predložila Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE-DE)
by Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE‑DE)
Zadeva: Potrdila o izvoru hidroelektrične energije, ki jo proizvaja Holding Slovenske elektrarne (HSE)
Subject: Guarantees of Origin (GoOs) for HSE-produced hydroelectric energy
Italijanske družbe so v letu 2005 kupile 1.922.516 MWh hidroelektrične energije, ki jo je proizvedel HSE, največji proizvajalec električne energije v Sloveniji.
In the year 2005 Italian companies purchased 1922516 MWh of hydroelectric energy produced by HSE, the main electricity producer in Slovenia.
Poglavitni razlog za nakup te energije je bil njen izvor, tj. da je bila proizvedena iz obnovljivih virov.
The main reason for purchasing this energy was its origin, i.e. it had been produced from renewable sources.
Italijanska zakonodaja zahteva, da proizvajalci in uvozniki električne energije iz konvencionalnih virov vnesejo v italijanski energetski sistem nekaj energije, pridobljene iz obnovljivih virov.
Italian laws require producers and importers of electrical energy from conventional sources to introduce into the Italian energy system a certain amount of energy produced from renewable sources.
HSE je kupcem v Italiji še pred 31. marcem 2006, ki so ga italijanski organi določili kot rok za uveljavitev potrdil za leto 2005, zagotovil potrdila o izvoru kot dokazilo, da energija, uvožena iz te družbe v letu 2005, prihaja iz obnovljivih virov energije.
HSE has provided the purchasing companies in Italy with Guarantees of Origin (GoOs) as evidence guaranteeing that the energy imported from HSE during the year 2005 comes from renewable sources before 31 March 2006, the due date defined by the Italian authorities for certification for 2005.
Potrdila o izvoru hidroelektrične energije, ki jo je HSE proizvedel v letu 2005, so bila izdana v skladu z Direktivo 2001/77/ES UL L 283, 27.10.2001, str.
GoOs for HSE-produced hydroelectric energy in 2005 have been issued in line with Directive 2001/77/EC OJ L 283, 27.10.2001, p.
Italijansko ministrstvo za gospodarski razvoj prej Ministrstvo za proizvodne dejavnosti - PAM. je v poročilu, sprejetem šele 15. marca 2006, pojasnilo in določilo pravila, ki se v skladu z italijansko Zakonodajno uredbo št. 387 z dne 29. decembra 2003 Italijanska vlada v skladu z Uredbo št. 387 priznava in sprejema zgolj potrdila o izvoru, ki so jih druge države članice izdale v skladu z Direktivo 2001/77/ES. uporabljajo za uvoženo energijo, pridobljeno iz obnovljivih virov.
With a report adopted as late as 15 March 2006, the Italian Economic Development Ministry Formerly Production Activities Ministry — PAM. clarified and defined the rules to be applied for imported energy obtained from renewable sources pursuant to the Italian Legislative Decree No 387 of 29 December 2003 According to Decree No 387 the Italian Government recognises and accepts only GoOs issued by other Member States pursuant to Directive 2001/77/EC. .
V tem poročilu je italijanska vlada navedla, da ne bo sprejemala potrdil vlad, katerih določbe o uzakonitvi so začele veljati po 31. decembru 2005.
In the report the Italian Government declared that it would not accept certifications from governments whose enactment provisions came into force later than 31 December 2005.
Italijansko ministrstvo in GRTN sta obvestilo o sprejetju uredbe o izdaji potrdil o izvoru v Sloveniji in njen neuradni prevod prejela kmalu po njeni objavi v uradnem listu.
The Italian ministry and GRTN received a note on acceptance of the Decree on issuing GoOs in Slovenia and its unofficial translation very soon after it was published in the Official Gazette.
Kljub temu je GRTN 10. julija 2006 pojasnil, da trenutno ne more sprejemati slovenskih potrdil o izvoru za leto 2005.
On 10 July 2006, GRTN nevertheless stated that it could not at the moment accept Slovenian GoOs for 2005.
Kot razlog je navedel datum začetka veljave uredbe o izdaji potrdil o izvoru električne energije v Sloveniji, ki je bila v Uradnem listu RS št. 121 objavljena 30. decembra 2005 in je začela veljati 14. januarja 2006.
The stated reason is the date of entry into force of the Decree on Issuing of GoOs of Electricity in Slovenia, which was published in the Slovenian Official Gazette No 121 on 30 December 2005, and came into force on 14 January 2006.
GRTN torej ni oporekal ustreznosti meril za izdajo potrdil o izvoru, uvedenih s slovensko zakonodajo, ampak zgolj dejstvu, da so začela veljati po 31. decembru 2005.
GRTN has thus not objected to the merits of the GoO issuing criteria introduced by the Slovenian laws, but only that it had come into force after 31 December 2005.
Tega pa nikakor ni mogoče obravnavati kot izdajo potrdil o izvoru za nazaj, saj se ta postopek tudi v skladu z italijanskimi zakoni vedno izvaja kot končna letna ocena v letu, ki sledi letu, ko je bila energija dejansko proizvedena (postopek priznavanja/izdaje italijanskih zelenih certifikatov - „Certificati Verdi“).
However, this fact cannot be seen in any way as issuing GoOs retroactively, since this procedure, also according to the Italian laws, is always carried out as a final year-in estimate the year following the year in which energy has been actually produced (Italian Certificati Verdi recognition/issuing procedure).
Negotovost in nepreglednost meril glede sprejemljivosti slovenskih potrdil o izvoru za italijansko vlado, s katero se sooča Slovenija, ni v skladu s členom 5(4) Direktive 2001/77/ES, ki navaja, da države članice ta potrdila medsebojno priznavajo.
The uncertainty and non-transparent criteria regarding the acceptance of Slovenian GoO by the Italian Government that Slovenia is facing, is not in accordance with Article 5(4) of Directive 2001/77/EC stating that GoOs are to be mutually recognised by Member States.
Posamezna država članica lahko priznanje potrdila zavrne zlasti iz razlogov, povezanih s preprečevanjem goljufij, vendar mora zavrnitev temeljiti na stvarnih, preglednih in nediskriminatornih merilih.
A Member State can refuse to recognise GoOs, particularly for reasons related to fraud prevention, but such a refusal must be based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria.
Kako se Komisija ponavadi odziva na nepregledne pogoje, ki jih neka država članica vsiljuje drugi državi članici?
How does the Commission normally react to such nontransparent conditions imposed upon a Member State by another Member State?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti, da odpravi negotovost, s katero se Slovenija sooča glede sprejemljivosti slovenskih potrdil o izvoru v Italiji?
What measures does the Commission intend to take to resolve the uncertainty Slovenia is facing regarding the acceptance of Slovenian GoOs in Italy?
Piebalgsa v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Piebalgs on behalf of the Commission
(30. januar 2007)
(30 January 2007)
Komisiji je znana težava, da Italija ne priznava slovenskih potrdil o izvoru obnovljive električne energije, proizvedene v letu 2005.
The Commission is aware of the problem of non-recognition by Italy of Slovenian guarantees of origin for renewable electricity produced in the year 2005.
Cenjena članica je pravilno opozorila na to, da država članica lahko zavrne priznanje potrdil o izvoru, zlasti iz razlogov, povezanih s preprečevanjem goljufij, vendar mora takšna zavrnitev temeljiti na stvarnih, preglednih in nediskriminatornih merilih.
As the Honourable Member correctly points out, a Member State can refuse to recognise guarantees of origin, particularly for reasons related to fraud prevention, but such a refusal must be based on objective, transparent and non-discriminatory criteria.