natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je razočaran nad zastojem pri pogajanjih Sveta o patentu Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi ustrezen pravni okvir za zaščito patentov in pravic intelektualne lastnine v zvezi z razširjanjem inovativnih zamisli med malimi podjetji in vsemi drugimi organi, ki delujejo na notranjem trgu; poudarja, da mora biti pridobitev patenta malim podjetjem cenovno dostopna;
Is disappointed by the deadlock in the Council's negotiations on a Community patent; urges the Commission to provide a suitable legal framework to protect patent and intellectual property rights regarding the dissemination of innovatory ideas among small enterprises and all other bodies operating within the internal market; stresses that patents should be affordable for small businesses;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za umik tretjine pregledanih zakonodajnih predlogov, da zagotovi preglednost in visoko kakovost zakonodajnega okvira, v katerem delujejo podjetja; poziva države članice, da podprejo Komisijo pri tem projektu z enakovrednimi ukrepi na nacionalni ravni; pozdravlja predlog Komisije, da se nove predpise preveri na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti, da se oceni njihov pozitiven in negativen vpliv na mala podjetja in podjetnike; zahteva strožje upoštevanje načela subsidiarnosti ter bolj sistematično uporabo ocenjevanja vpliva in javnega posvetovanja pri razvoju novih predlogov politike; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo študije učinkov zakonodaje Skupnosti jasno in izrecno zajele mala podjetja; meni, da bi morali predlog Komisije v zvezi z novimi uredbami uradno razširiti na obstoječe uredbe, in da bi bilo treba uredbe ponovno pregledati ali razveljaviti takoj, ko bi se na ravni Skupnosti izkazale za nepotrebne; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi jasno zastavljen časovni okvir in akcijski načrt za dosego tega cilja;
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to withdraw one third of screened legislative proposals to ensure that the regulatory framework in which businesses operate is simple and of high quality; calls upon the Member States to support the Commission in this project with equivalent measures at national level; welcomes the Commission's proposal that new regulations at national and Community level should be screened to assess their impact, both positive and negative, on small enterprises and entrepreneurs; requests that the principle of subsidiarity be more rigorously taken into account and a more systematic use be made of impact assessments and public consultation in the development of new policy proposals; calls accordingly on the Commission to ensure that impact assessments of Community legislation are clearly and specifically extended to small enterprises; believes that this Commission proposal concerning new regulations should also be formally extended to include existing regulations and that, where legislation is deemed unnecessary at Community level, it should be revised or repealed; calls on the Commission to draw up a clear timetable and action plan in order to deliver this objective;
poudarja potrebo po pospeševanju dolgoročnih strukturnih reform v vseh državah članicah, da se okrepi konkurenčnost malih podjetij, ustvarijo ugodnejši pogoji za podjetja, zlasti za mala podjetja, in dokončno vzpostavi povsem delujoči notranji trg;
Underlines the need to accelerate far-reaching structural reforms in each Member State in order to strengthen small enterprises' competitiveness, create favourable conditions for businesses, especially small businesses, and complete the creation of a fully-functioning internal market;
zato zahteva konkretne politike in ukrepe za povečanje vlaganj na nacionalni in regionalni ravni; nujno poziva k ustreznim investicijskim spodbudam za mala podjetja, kakršne so poenostavitev postopkov za podporo malim naložbam preko javnih skladov za razvoj, skladov tveganega kapitala (posebno skladov semenskega kapitala), financiranja poslovnih angelov in naložb fizičnih oseb (mikroangeli) ter skladov za mikrokredite, ki delujejo na podlagi partnerstva med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem; spodbuja združevanje virov in informacij v zvezi s skupnimi projekti, večje sodelovanje pri projektih, ki jih izvajajo države članice, ter preglednost obdavčevanja na področju politik, usmerjenih v pritegnitev tujih vlaganj;
Calls, for that reason, for concrete policies and actions to increase investments at national and regional level; calls urgently for suitable investment incentives to be given to small businesses, such as simplified procedures for supporting small investments via public development funds, venture capital funds (especially seed capital funds), business angel finance, investment by private individuals (micro-angels) and micro-credit funds operating on a public-private partnership basis; encourages the pooling of resources and information concerning joint projects, greater participation in projects carried out by Member States and transparency of taxation regarding policies aimed at attracting foreign investments;
priznava potrebo po posebni pomoči malim podjetjem pri izvajanju okoljske in socialne zakonodaje;
Recognises the need for special assistance to small enterprises in implementing environmental and social legislation;
meni, da morajo vsi v listini določeni ukrepi, ki pospešujejo podjetništvo, v enaki meri uporabljati tudi za samozaposlene, predvsem kar zadeva njihova interesna področja, kot je sistem socialne varnosti, preprečevanje poklicnih nevarnosti ali zavarovanje za primer brezposelnosti;
Believes that all the measures laid down in the Charter to stimulate business enterprise should be equally applicable to the self-employed, especially as regards matters of interest to them, such as social security systems, prevention of occupational hazards, and unemployment insurance;
O prihodnosti listine
The Charter's future
upošteva predlog, da se poročila o napredku akcijskega načrta za spodbujanje podjetništva poveže z mehanizmi spremljanja izvajanja listine, in, če bo to potrebno, tudi preučil vsebino in prednostne naloge akcijskega načrta;
Takes note of the suggestion of linking the progress reports on the Entrepreneurship Action Plan with the reporting mechanism for the Charter, and revising the content and priorities of the Action Plan, if need be;
v primeru pregleda listine poziva, da se v besedilu opredelijo obrtna podjetja; zato upa, da si bo četrta evropska konferenca obrti in malih podjetij kot glavni cilj zastavila pomoč pri določanju skupnih interesov obrtnega sektorja na evropski ravni in da bo imela tehnična, človeška, finančna in politična sredstva, s katerimi bo lahko izdelala strategijo, ki bo bolje prilagojena specifični naravi, potrebam in pričakovanjem obrtnega sektorja;
With a view to the possible revision of the Charter, calls for craft enterprises to be expressly recognised in the text; with this in view, hopes that the main goal of the Fourth European Conference on Crafts and Small Businesses will be to help define the common interests of craft sectors at European level and that it will have the technical, human, financial and political means to enable it to draw up a strategy better geared to the specific nature, needs and expectations of craft sectors;
čestita novim državam članicam za dejavno učenje od drugih in za začetne dosežke pri izvajanju listine, čeprav je nujno poskrbeti tudi za nadaljnji razvoj; opozarja na še posebej pomembno vlogo MSP v novih državah članicah, predvsem v tistih, kjer pomembne institucionalne in politične spremembe še potekajo;
Congratulates the new Member States for actively learning from others and on their early results in implementing the Charter though further progress must be made; draws attention to the particularly important role played by SMEs in the new Member States, especially in those in which significant institutional and political changes are underway;
obžaluje dejstvo, da v prihodnje ne bo več letnih poročil o listini, saj bodo ta odslej vključena v poročilo o lizbonski strategiji; meni, da za krepitev vloge MSP to vsekakor pomeni korak nazaj; nadalje obžaluje, da bo postopek poročanja o listini, ki vključuje letne dvostranske razprave med predstavniki podjetniških organizacij odslej potekel brez neposrednega sodelovanja MSP; ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba to odločitev spremeniti;
Regrets the fact that there will be no more annual Charter reports in future, as Charter reporting will from now on be absorbed into Lisbon reporting; believes that this is certainly a backward step as far as future focus on SMEs is concerned; further regrets that the process of Charter reporting, which involved annual bilateral discussions with representatives of business organisations, will now lapse without such future direct input from SMEs; considers that this decision should be revisited;
meni, da bi predlog lahko omogočil racionalno spremljanje obeh instrumentov, vendar opozarja, da listina ne bi smela postati zgolj ena od rubrik akcijskega načrta;
Considers that while this would make it possible to rationalise follow-up action for the two instruments, it is not acceptable for implementation of the Charter to become merely a subheading of the Action Plan;
meni, da je treba posvetiti pozornost posebnemu položaju neprofitnih MSP;
Believes that consideration needs to be given to the special situation of non-profit SMEs;
ocenjuje, da je predlagana rešitev mogoča le ob upoštevanju sledečih pogojev:
Therefore considers that this solution would be acceptable only on the following conditions:
ohranitvi poudarka v listini na malih in mikro podjetjih in z njimi povezanimi specifičnimi dejavnostmi,
retaining the small and micro-businesses dimension of the Charter, with actions specifically intended for them;
uvedbi posebnega mehanizma za spremljanje in ocenjevanje držav pristopnic in kandidatk ter pridruženih držav, ki niso vključene v akcijski načrt,
setting up a specific follow-up and evaluation mechanism for the accession and candidate countries, and associated states that are not party to the Action Plan;
upoštevanju sodelovanja strokovnih organizacij, ki imajo pri izvajanju listine bolj pomembno vlogo kot v akcijskem načrtu,
taking account of the participation of the professional organisations, which have a more important role in implementing the Charter than in the Action Plan;
zagotavljanju širitve in izmenjave najboljših praks med državami podpisnicami listine;
maintaining the dissemination of best practices and exchanges between the Charter's signatory states;
poudarja, da spremljanje izvajanja listine, vključeno v lizbonsko strategijo, ne sme biti samo sebi namen; poudarja, da se morebitna poenostavitev tega spremljanja ne bi smela izvesti na škodo vsebine in snovi letnih poročil o spremljanju listine, ki jih posredujejo članice; zato poziva, da se ta nacionalna letna poročila še naprej osredotočajo na uvajanje najboljših praks, preizkušanje, predstavljanje otipljivih zakonodajnih ukrepov in posebnih političnih obvez, ki bodo namenjeni majhnim in mikro podjetjem;
Stresses that including the follow-up to the implementation of the Charter as part of the Lisbon Strategy must not be an end in itself; emphasises that, if this follow-up action is simplified in any way, this should not be at the expense of the content and substance of the annual reports forwarded by the states concerning follow-up to the Charter; calls therefore for these national reports to continue to focus on the introduction of best practice, experimentation, the presentation of concrete legislative measures and specific political commitments aimed at small and micro enterprises;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da bo ocenila izvajanje listine v kontekstu lizbonskega procesa;
Welcomes the intention of the Commission to evaluate the implementation of the Charter in the contextual framework of the Lisbon process;
poziva Komisijo, naj vključi vse predstavnike malih in obrtnih podjetij v vsak postopek pregleda in naj upošteva te pogoje v predlogu za pregled listine in izboljšanje njenega spremljanja, ki ga bo predstavila Parlamentu;
Calls on the Commission to involve all representatives of small and craft enterprises in any revision process and to take these conditions into account when it presents to Parliament a proposal for revising the Charter and improving its follow-up action;
poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bo letno poročilo o listini ostalo ključni instrument za nadzor razvoja na področju podjetništva;
Calls on the Council, the Commission, and the Member States to ensure that the annual report on the Charter remains the key instrument for monitoring the development in the field of entrepreneurship;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o skupni ureditvi trgov za sladkor ( KOM(2005)0263 – C6-0243/2005 – 2005/0118(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the common organisation of the markets in the sugar sector ( COM(2005)0263 – C6-0243/2005 – 2005/0118(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0263 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0263 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0243/2005 ),
having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0243/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračun, Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0391/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Committee on International Trade ( A6-0391/2005 ),
opozarja, da so sredstva iz predloga uredbe do sklenitve sporazuma o finančni perspektivi za obdobje od leta 2007 dalje zgolj okvirni;
Records that the appropriations shown in the proposal for a regulation are for guidance only until such time as an agreement has been reached on the financial perspective for the period covering 2007 onwards;
poziva Komisijo, naj po sprejetju naslednje finančne perspektive potrdi navedene zneske v predlogu uredbe ali po potrebi predloži prilagojene zneske v odobritev Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ter na ta način zagotovi združljivost z ustreznimi mejami;
Asks the Commission, once the next financial perspective has been adopted, to confirm the amounts shown in the proposal for a regulation or, where appropriate, to submit the adjusted amounts for the approval of the European Parliament and the Council, thereby ensuring compatibility with the relevant ceilings;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da je Svet Evropske unije naznanil politični dogovor glede reforme sladkorne sheme, ki prinaša daljnosežne posledice za prihodnost sektorja v mnogih državah članicah, brez predhodne pridobitve mnenja Parlamenta; Svet ne sme nikoli dokončno zaključiti političnega dogovora pred zaključkom posvetovanja s Parlamentom;
Considers it unacceptable that the Council should have announced a political agreement on sugar reform, with far-reaching implications for the future of the industry in many Member States, without first having obtained the opinion of the European Parliament; the Council may never conclude a final political agreement before consultation of the European Parliament has been completed;
Trg sladkorja v Skupnosti temelji na načelih, ki so bila na področju drugih skupnih tržnih ureditev v preteklosti
The sugar market in the Community is based on principles which for other common market organisations have been
v temelju pregledati
fundamentally review
skupno ureditev trga za sladkor.
the common organisation of the market in the sugar sector.
(3a) Trg sladkorja Skupnosti bi lahko bil zlasti spremenljiv v prvih štirih letih reforme (od leta 2006 do 2010), ko se bo začela izvajati shema za prestrukturiranje.
(3a) The Community sugar market is likely to be particularly volatile for the first four years of the reform (2006 to 2010), whilst the restructuring scheme is put into operation.
V štirih letih v obdobju od leta 2006 do 2010 je treba ohraniti sistem intervencijskih cen ter po potrebi predvideti nakup sladkorja s strani intervencijskih organov.
It is therefore necessary to retain the intervention price system for the four-year period from 2006 to 2010, with provision being made, where necessary, for sugar being bought in by the intervention agencies.
V ta namen je treba določiti intervencijsko ceno za beli in surovi sladkor na ravni, ki bo na eni strani pridelovalcem sladkorne pese ali trsa zagotavljala pravično plačilo, na drugi pa omogočala spoštovanje interesov potrošnikov.
To this end, intervention prices should be set for both white and raw sugar at a level that ensures a fair income for sugar beet and sugar cane producers, while protecting the interests of consumers.
Od tržnega leta 2010/2011 naprej bo določena referenčna cena, ki bo nadomestila intervencijski sistem.
As from the marketing year 2010/2011, a reference price should be established in place of the intervention system.
Sprememba 3 Uvodna izjava 5 a (novo)
Amendment 3 Recital 5 a (new)
Sprememba 4 Uvodna izjava 6 a (novo)
Amendment 4 Recital 6 a (new)
(6a) Ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se bo samo majhen del pri znižanju cen sladkorja povrnil evropskim potrošnikom (1,5 % za predelan sladkor, kar predstavlja 70 % vsega proizvedenega sladkorja; 5 % surovega sladkorja, kar predstavlja 30 % vsega proizvedenega sladkorja), je treba ravni referenčnih ali intervencijskih cen in minimalnih cen sladkorne pese določiti predvsem glede na spreminjanje količin proizvodnje, uvoza in porabe, da bi tako zagotovili ravnovesje na trgu Skupnosti.
(6a) As only a small proportion of the reduction in sugar prices will be passed on to the European consumer (1.5% for white sugar, which accounts for 70% of sugar production; 5% for raw sugar, which accounts for the remaining 30%), the reference or intervention price and the minimum price for beet should be established primarily on the basis of the trends in quantities produced, imports and consumption, in such a way as to ensure balance on the Community market.
Posebni instrumenti so potrebni, da se zagotovi primerno ravnovesje pravic in obveznosti med podjetji za proizvodnjo sladkorja in pridelovalci sladkorne pese.
Specific instruments are needed to ensure a fair balance of rights and obligations between sugar undertakings and sugar beet growers.
Okvirni predpisi
framework provisions
naj bi zato določali le minimalna jamstva, ki jih zahtevajo tako pridelovalci sladkorne pese kot tudi industrija sladkorja, da se zagotovi neovirano delovanje trga s sladkorjem z možnostjo odstopanja od nekaterih pravil v kontekstu panožnih sporazumov.
should only define the minimum guarantees required by both sugar beet growers and the sugar industry to ensure a smooth functioning of the sugar market with the possibility to derogate from some rules in the context of an agreement within the trade.
V primeru specifičnih gospodarskih težav, pri katerih
If specific economic difficulties arise for which the
panožni sporazumi
framework provisions
, po predhodnem posvetovanju s službami Komisije, uvedli odstopanja od določenih pravil pod pogojem, da so sorazmerna in časovno omejena.
cannot provide a valid solution, it should be possible for agreements within the trade to introduce, following consultation of the Commission's services, derogations from certain rules provided they are proportionate and of limited duration
Razlogi, ki so Skupnost v preteklosti privedli do sprejetja sistema proizvodnih kvot za sladkor, izoglukozo in inulinski sirup, še vedno veljajo.
The reasons which in the past led the Community to adopt a production quota system for sugar, isoglucose and inuline syrup still remain valid.
Vendar pa je zaradi razvoja znotraj Skupnosti in na mednarodnem področju potrebno prilagoditi proizvodni sistem,
However, due to developments within the Community and internationally, it is necessary to adjust the production system
da bi omogočili novo ureditev in zmanjšanje kvot
in order to provide for new arrangements and reductions of the quotas
zlasti kvote, da bi tako vzpostavili tržno ravnovesje v sektorju sladkorja
, in particular the quotas, with a view to ensuring balance on the markets in the sugar sector
Sprememba 7 Uvodna izjava 8 a (novo)
Amendment 7 Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Leta 2000 je Evropska unija uvedla ureditev, ki temelji na neomejenem dostopu do ničte dajatve za sladkor, proizveden v državah z območja Balkana, kar je povzročilo izjemno povečanje uvoza, zlasti zaradi nezakonitega trgovanja, ki je bilo dolgo časa neodkrito.
(8a) The introduction by the European Union in 2000 of a regime based on unlimited zero-duty access to sugar from the Balkan countries resulted in an unprecedented rise in imports, due, in particular, to irregular trade practices which remained undetected for a considerable time.
Sprememba 8 Uvodna izjava 8 b (novo)
Amendment 8 Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) Obstaja objektivno tveganje, da se nezakonito trgovanje, ki se je razvilo po odprtju trga Skupnosti uvozu sladkorja iz držav z Balkana, brez carine in količinskih omejitev, ponovno pojavi z dejanskim začetkom veljavnosti pobude "vse razen orožja", sprejete v korist najmanj razvitih držav.
(8b) There are objective risks that the irregular trade practices that developed following the opening-up of the Community market to zero-duty, quota-free sugar imports from the Balkan countries could reappear with the full entry into force of the "Everything But Arms" initiative for the least developed countries (LDCs).
Da bi Skupnost lahko uspešno in racionalno nadaljevala s sprejemanjem proizvodnih kvot, je zelo pomembno, da pripravi primerne regulacijske instrumente, ki ji bodo omogočili nadzor nad ponudbo sladkorja na svojem trgu in preprečili nezakonito trgovanje, ki sproža motenje na trgu in je vir neravnovesja proizvodnega sistema Skupnosti.
If the Community is to adapt its production quotas in an effective and rational fashion, it will need suitable regulatory instruments, which enable it to keep control over the supply of sugar on its market and to eliminate all irregular trade practices, given that the latter disturb the market and unbalance the Community's production system.
Sprememba 9 Uvodna izjava 8 c (novo)
Amendment 9 Recital 8 c (new)
(8 c) Pri pobudi "vse razen orožja", v skladu s katero bodo lahko najmanj razvite države uvažale sladkor brez tarif in kvot, obstaja tveganje, da se pojavi tristranska trgovina, ki bi jo bilo v okviru zmernih finančnih pogojev težko odkriti in ki bi morda lahko ogrozila stabilnost trga Skupnosti.
(8c) In the case of the "Everything But Arms" initiative, under which the LDCs will be able to import sugar free of tariffs and quotas, there is some risk of three-way trading, which would be virtually impossible to detect under reasonable financial conditions and which could potentially undermine the stability of the Community market.
Ta tristranska trgovina lahko ogrozi tudi sam razvoj v najmanj razvitih državah, ker bodo imeli koristi le veliki mednarodni akterji, pri čemer ne bo pozitivnega učinka na lokalne skupnosti, ki so odvisne od proizvodnje sladkorja.
This three-way trading might also threaten development itself in the LDCs, since it would benefit only the major international operators, whilst having no positive effect on the local communities dependent on sugar production.
Ker je večina držav v razvoju dejansko odvisna od sladkorja v izrazito izvozno usmerjenih proizvodnih ureditvah, je zelo pomembno zagotoviti, da nevarnost tristranske trgovine ne ovira dostopa držav v razvoju do trgov EU.
Given that many developing countries are in fact dependent on sugar under purely export-oriented production regimes, it is crucial to ensure that the threat of three-way trading does not hinder developing countries" access to EU markets.
Sprememba 10 Uvodna izjava 9
Amendment 10 Recital 9