natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je predlog temeljil na členu 308 Pogodbe ES, ki je določal posvetovanje s Parlamentom in soglasno sprejetje v Svetu,
whereas that proposal was based on Article 308 of the EC Treaty, which required consultation with Parliament and a unanimous vote in the Council,
ker je Parlament v skladu s postopkom posvetovanja v svojem stališču z dne 10. aprila 2002 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o patentu Skupnosti UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
whereas in its position of 10 April 2002 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
odobril predlog Komisije, kakor je bil spremenjen,
Parliament, acting under the consultation procedure, approved the Commission proposal as amended,
ker je hitro postalo jasno, da imajo nekatere države članice določene težave, zaradi katerih niso mogle sprejeti predlagane uredbe; ker zlasti nekatere države članice niso mogle sprejeti ureditve prevajanja za patent Skupnosti, zaradi česar je Svet sklepal, da zaradi vprašanja prevajanja ne more doseči političnega sporazuma o predlogu Komisije, saj zanj ni soglasja,
whereas it had quickly become clear that some Member States had specific problems which made it impossible for them to accept the proposed regulation; whereas, in particular, some Member States were unable to accept the translation arrangements for the Community patent, which led the Council to conclude that, on account of the translation regime issue, the Council was unable to reach a political agreement on the Commission proposal, due to the lack of a unanimous consensus,
ker je Komisija 9. januarja 2006 začela posvetovanja o prihodnji patentni politiki v Evropi, na kar se je Parlament odzval s sprejetjem resolucije 12. oktobra 2006 UL C 308 E, 16.12.2006, str.
whereas on 9 January 2006 the Commission launched a consultation on future patent policy in Europe to which Parliament responded by adopting a resolution on 12 October 2006 OJ C 308 E, 16.12.2006, p.
ker so se posvetovanja v Svetu znova začela 3. aprila 2007, po sprejetju sporočila Komisije o izboljšanju patentnega sistema v Evropi ( KOM(2007)0165 ),
whereas discussions in the Council were re-launched after the adoption on 3 April 2007 of the Commission Communication on enhancing the patent system in Europe ( COM(2007)0165 ),
ker je 4. decembra 2009 Svet sprejel sklepe o glavnih značilnostih prihodnjega patentnega sistema, ki bo temeljil na dveh stebrih: (i) oblikovanju enotnega sistema reševanja patentnih sporov in (ii) oblikovanju patenta EU – pravnega instrumenta, ki bo jamčil veljavnost patentov po celotni EU; ker Svet meni, da morajo biti ti sklepi del skupnega končnega sporazuma o svežnju ukrepov za izboljšanje patentnega sistema v Evropi, ki zajemajo ustanovitev sodišča za evropske patente in patente EU, uvedbo patenta EU, vključno s posebno ureditvijo prevajanja, okrepljeno partnerstvo med Evropskim patentnim uradom in osrednjimi uradi držav članic za industrijsko lastnino in, v potrebnem obsegu, spremembe Evropske patentne konvencije,
whereas on 4 December 2009 the Council adopted conclusions on the main features of the future patent system based on two pillars: (i) the creation of a unified patent litigation system, and (ii) the creation of an EU patent – a legal instrument for granting patents valid across the EU as a whole; whereas the Council considered that those conclusions should form part of the overall final agreement on a package of measures for an Enhanced Patent System in Europe comprising the creation of a European and EU Patents Court (EEUPC), an EU patent, including the separate regulation on the translation arrangements, an Enhanced Partnership between the European Patent Office and central industrial property offices of Member States and, to the extent necessary, amendments to the European Patent Convention,
ker se je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 z uvedbo člena 118 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) spremenila pravna podlaga za uvedbo patenta EU, in sicer je v tem členu navedeno: „Pri vzpostavitvi ali delovanju notranjega trga Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita ukrepe za uvedbo evropskih pravic intelektualne lastnine, da se zagotovi enotno varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine v vsej Uniji in vzpostavi centralizirana ureditev na ravni Unije na področju potrjevanja, usklajevanja in nadzorovanja.“;
whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009 brought about a change of the legal basis for the creation of the EU patent by introducing Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), according to which: ‘In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union-wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements’,
ker je v skladu s prvim odstavkom člena 118 PDEU patent EU kot evropska pravica intelektualne lastnine lahko uveden po rednem zakonodajnem postopku; ker mora v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 118 PDEU Svet po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku in soglasno odločiti o jezikovni ureditvi za te pravice,
whereas in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 118 TFEU the EU patent as a European intellectual property right can be established under the ordinary legislative procedure; whereas, however, in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 118 TFEU a special legislative procedure requiring unanimity within the Council must be followed for the establishment of the language arrangements for such rights,
ker je po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe Komisija potrdila svoj predlog iz leta 2000 KOM(2009)0665 .
whereas following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon the Commission confirmed its 2000 proposal COM(2009)0665 .
; ker je Parlament v resoluciji z dne 5. maja 2010 o posledicah začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja ( KOM(2009)0665 ) – „omnibus“ Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0126 .
; whereas in order to accelerate the procedure and allow the Council to formally transpose its political conclusions of 4 December 2009 into a Council position, which would be the next step in the ordinary legislative procedure, Parliament in its resolution of 5 May 2010 on the consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures ( COM(2009)0665 ) – ‘omnibus’ Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0126 .
potrdil svoje stališče, da pospeši postopek, Svetu pa omogoči, da uradno prenese svoje politične sklepe z dne 4. decembra 2009 v stališče Sveta, kar je naslednji korak v rednem zakonodajnem postopku; ker Svet svojih sklepov ni spremenil v stališče in torej dela v zvezi s patentom EU ni možno nadaljevati na podlagi predloga Komisije iz leta 2000,
confirmed its 2002 position as its first-reading position; whereas the Council has not transposed its conclusions into a position and, accordingly, no further work on the EU patent can be carried out on the basis of the 2000 Commission proposal,
ker je Komisija 30. junija 2010 sprejela predlog Uredbe Sveta o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije ( KOM(2010)0350 ), ki nadgrajuje obstoječi jezikovni sistem Evropskega patentnega urada,
whereas on 30 June 2010 the Commission adopted a proposal for a Council Regulation on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent ( COM(2010)0350 ), which built on the existing language regime of the European Patent Office,
ker je bilo kljub nekaj krogom pogajanj, ki jih je leta 2010 pripravil Svet, na seji Sveta za konkurenčnost dne 10. decembra 2010 potrjeno, da so težave nepremostljive, zaradi česar soglasje o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije ni možno niti sedaj niti v bližnji prihodnosti, in da z uporabo ustreznih določb pogodb ni bilo mogoče v razumnem času doseči ciljev predlaganih uredb za vzpostavitev enotnega patentnega varstva po vsej Evropski uniji,
whereas despite several rounds of negotiations undertaken by the Council in 2010, it was confirmed at the Competitiveness Council meeting on 10 December 2010 that insurmountable difficulties existed making a decision on the translation arrangements requiring unanimity impossible now and in the foreseeable future and that the objectives of the proposed Regulations to establish unitary patent protection in the entire European Union could not be attained within a reasonable period by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties,
ker je več držav članic nakazalo, da so pripravljene obravnavati možnost vzpostavitve enotnega patenta v sklopu okrepljenega sodelovanja,
whereas several Member States indicated their readiness to consider the possibility of establishing a unitary patent within the framework of enhanced cooperation,
ker je z naslovitvijo prošnje na Komisijo v skladu s členom 329(1) PDEU več kot devet držav članic sporočilo, da nameravajo vzpostaviti medsebojno okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva, nato pa je Komisija predložila predlog sklepa Sveta o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva,
whereas more than nine Member States have indicated their intention to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection by addressing a request to the Commission in accordance with Article 329(1) TFEU, and subsequently the Commission has presented a proposal for a Council decision authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection,
ker je Parlament preveril skladnost člena 20 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členov 326 do 334 PDEU,
whereas Parliament has verified compliance with Article 20 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Articles 326 to 334 TFEU,
ker je v skladu s členom 20 PEU za vzpostavitev medsebojnega okrepljenega sodelovanja, ki ni na področju izključne pristojnosti Unije, potrebnih najmanj devet držav članic, pri čemer lahko v mejah in v skladu s postopki ter pod pogoji, določenimi v tem členu in v členih 326 do 334 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, uporabijo njene institucije in izvajajo te pristojnosti ob pravno dosledni uporabi določb Pogodb;
whereas, according to Article 20 TEU, a minimum of nine Member States may establish enhanced cooperation between themselves within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competences, while using its institutions and exercising those competences by applying the provisions of the Treaties in a legally consistent manner, subject to the limits and in accordance with the arrangements laid down in that Article and in Articles 326 to 334 TFEU,
ker uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva ni na seznamu področij v izključni pristojnosti Unije, določenih v členu 3(1) PDEU; ker je pravna podlaga za uvedbo evropskih pravic intelektualne lastnine člen 118 PDEU, ki posebej navaja vzpostavitev in delovanje notranjega trga, ki je v skladu s členom 4 PDEU v deljeni pristojnosti Unije; ker torej spada uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva, vključno z ustrezno ureditvijo prevajanja, v področje, ki ni v izključni pristojnosti Unije,
whereas the creation of unitary patent protection is not included in the list of areas of exclusive competence of the Union set out in Article 3(1) TFEU; whereas the legal basis for the creation of European intellectual property rights is Article 118 TFEU, which makes a specific reference to the establishment and functioning of the internal market, one of the shared competences of the Union according to Article 4 TFEU; whereas the creation of unitary patent protection, including applicable translation arrangements, therefore falls within the framework of the Union's non-exclusive competence,
ker lahko zlasti za to okrepljeno sodelovanje menimo, da spodbuja cilje Unije, varuje njene interese in krepi proces vključevanja v pomenu člena 20 PEU, glede na oceno učinka zgoraj omenjenega predloga iz leta 2010 za uredbo o ureditvi prevajanja za patent Evropske unije, ki jo je pripravila Komisija in je pokazala, da ni enotnega patenta, ki bi zagotavljal varstvo po vsej EU, zaradi česar je patentni sistem razdrobljen; ker so posledice te razdrobljenosti visoki stroški in zapleteno potrjevanje evropskih patentov v posameznih državah članicah, ki lahko znašajo do 40 odstotkov celotnih stroškov postopka patentiranja v Evropi; ker bi uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva za skupino držav članic izboljšala raven zaščite patentov, saj bi se lahko pridobilo enotno patentno varstvo na ozemlju sodelujočih držav članic in bi bili s tem na njihovem ozemlju odpravljeni stroški in zapleti, kar bi spodbujalo znanstveni in tehnološki napredek in delovanje notranjega trga,
whereas, in particular, this enhanced cooperation may be regarded as furthering the Union's objectives, protecting its interests and reinforcing its integration process within the meaning of Article 20 TEU, in the light of the Commission's impact assessment in connection with its above-mentioned 2010 proposal for a regulation on the translation arrangements for the European Union patent, which pointed to the lack of a unitary patent providing protection across the entire EU leading to a fragmented patent system; whereas this fragmentation is caused by the high costs and complexity of validating European patents in individual Member States, which can amount to 40% of the overall costs of patenting in Europe; whereas the creation of unitary patent protection for a group of Member States would improve the level of patent protection by making it possible to obtain uniform patent protection throughout the territories of the participating Member States and would eliminate the costs and complexity for those territories, thus fostering scientific and technological advances and the functioning of the internal market,
ker je iz vsega, kar se je dogajalo pred to pobudo, razvidno, da je sklep predlagan kot zadnja možnost in ciljev sodelovanja v Uniji ne bo možno doseči v razumnem času;
whereas it is apparent from the antecedents of this initiative that the proposed decision is being put forward as a last resort and that the objectives of the cooperation cannot be attained within a reasonable period by the Union,
ker so izpolnjene tudi zahteve iz členov 326 do 334 PDEU; ker bo okrepljeno sodelovanje z odpravo ovir za prost pretok blaga prispevalo k pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga, pripomoglo k preprečevanju kršitev patentov, morebiti po vsej Uniji povečalo število izumiteljev, ki zaprosijo za patentno varstvo, omogočilo enak dostop do enotnega patentnega varstva za vse izumitelje, inovativna podjetja in imetnike patentov, bodisi iz sodelujočih držav članic ali tistih, ki ne sodelujejo, zagotavljalo dodaten instrument, ki bo dostopen vsem imetnikom patentov v Uniji, izboljšalo okvirne pogoje za inovativna podjetja v Uniji, med sodelujočimi državami članicami pa odpravilo sedanjo razdrobljenost zaradi „razmejitev“ patentih pravic med državami članicami,
whereas the requirements of Articles 326 to 334 TFEU are also satisfied; whereas enhanced cooperation will facilitate the proper functioning of the internal market by eliminating obstacles to the free movement of goods, helping to tackle patent infringements, possibly increasing the number of inventors seeking patent protection throughout the Union, providing equal access to unitary patent protection to all inventors, innovative companies and patent-holders whether they come from participating Member States or non-participating Member States, providing an additional instrument available to all patent-holders in the Union, improving the framework conditions for innovative businesses throughout the Union, and eliminating, among participating Member States, the current fragmentation where patent right ‘borders’ exist between Member States,
ni približevanja materialnega patentnega prava na ravni Unije ter ker Uredba (ES) št. 1610/96 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. julija 1996 o uvedbi dodatnega varstvenega certifikata za fitofarmacevtska sredstva UL L 198, 8.8.1996, str.
, no approximation of substantive patent law exists at Union level, and whereas Regulation (EC) No 1610/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation of a supplementary protection certificate for plant protection products OJ L 198, 8.8.1996, p.
in Uredba (ES) št. 469/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. maja 2009 o dodatnem varstvenem certifikatu za zdravila UL L 152, 16.6.2009, str.
and Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products OJ L 152, 16.6.2009, p.
urejata način podaljšanja veljavnosti patentov za določene vrste vsebin patentov; ker okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju patentov ne bi povzročilo razlikovanja, saj bodo enotni patent lahko uporabljali vsi uporabniki patentnega sistema po vsej Uniji,
concern patent term extensions for specific types of patented subject matter; whereas enhanced cooperation in the area of patents would not cause discrimination since access to the unitary patent will be open to users of the patent system from all over the Union,
ker bo okrepljeno sodelovanje spoštovalo pravice, pristojnosti in obveznosti držav članic, ki v njem ne sodelujejo, če možnost pridobitve enotnega patentnega varstva na ozemlju sodelujočih držav članic ne bo vplivala na dostopnost ali pogoje patentnega varstva na ozemljih držav članic, ki ne sodelujejo,
whereas enhanced cooperation will respect the rights, competences and obligations of the non-participating Member States, inasmuch as the possibility of obtaining unitary patent protection on the territories of the participating Member States does not affect the availability or the conditions of patent protection on the territories of non-participating Member States,
ker člen 328(1) PDEU določa, da se lahko v okrepljeno sodelovanje kadar koli vključi vsaka država članica, ki v njem želi sodelovati; ker bi morale Komisija in države članice, ki so že udeležene pri okrepljenem sodelovanju, od začetka in ves čas naprej spodbujati in k udeležbi privabljati čim večje število držav članic,
whereas Article 328(1) TFEU provides that enhanced cooperation is to be open at any time to all Member States that wish to participate; whereas the Commission and the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation should promote from the beginning, and keep promoting and encouraging, the participation of as many Member States as possible,
ker je za okrepljeno sodelovanje potrebna privolitev Parlamenta ne glede na to, katere države članice bodo udeležene,
whereas the consent of Parliament concerns the enhanced cooperation and does not prejudge which Member States will participate in it,
ker člen 333(2) PDEU omogoča Svetu (natančneje, tistim članicam Sveta, ki zastopajo države članice, ki sodelujejo v okrepljenem sodelovanju), da odloči, da bo namesto po posebnem zakonodajnem postopku iz drugega odstavka člena 118, po katerem se je s Parlamentom zgolj posvetoval, ukrepal po rednem zakonodajnem postopku,
whereas Article 333(2) TFEU allows the Council (or, more precisely, those members of the Council representing the Member States participating in enhanced cooperation) to adopt a decision stipulating that it will act under the ordinary legislative procedure, rather than the special legislative procedure provided for in the second paragraph of Article 118 TFEU, under which Parliament is merely consulted,
odobri osnutek sklepa Sveta, ne glede na to, katere države članice so udeležene;
Consents to the draft Council decision, without prejudice to which are the participating Member States;
poziva Svet, naj sprejme sklep v skladu s členom 333(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, da bo o predlogu uredbe Sveta za izvajanje okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva glede jezikovne ureditve za evropske pravice intelektualne lastnine v skladu s členom 118 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije odločal po rednem zakonodajnem postopku,
Calls on the Council to adopt a decision pursuant to Article 333(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union stipulating that, when it comes to the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with respect to language arrangements for the European intellectual property rights pursuant to the second paragraph of Article 118 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, it will act under the ordinary legislative procedure;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. februarja 2011 o predlogu uredbe Sveta (Euratom) o najvišji dovoljeni stopnji radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti (prenovitev) ( KOM(2010)0184 – C7-0137/2010 – 2010/0098(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 February 2011 on the proposal for a Council regulation (Euratom) laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency (recast) ( COM(2010)0184 – C7-0137/2010 – 2010/0098(COD) )
(Redni zakonodajni postopek: prva obravnava – prenovitev)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading -recast)
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2010)0184 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2010)0184 ),
ob upoštevanju posvetovanja Sveta s Parlamentom ( C7-0137/2010 ),
having regard to Council's consultation of Parliament ( C7-0137/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in 168(4)(b) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 168 (4) (b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 15. septembra 2010 UL C 48, 15.2.2011, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 15 September 2010 OJ C 48, 15.2.2011, p.
ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve Odboru za industrijo, raziskave in energijo z dne 29. junija 2010 v skladu s členom 87(3) Poslovnika,
having regard to the letter of 29 June 2010 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju členov 87, 55 in 37 Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 87, 55 and 37 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energijo ( A7-0001/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0001/2011 ),
sprejme stališče v prvi obravnavi, kot je opredeljeno v nadaljevanju, ob upoštevanju priporočil posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
poziva Komisijo, naj zadevo ponovno predloži Parlamentu, če namerava svoj predlog bistveno spremeniti ali nadomestiti z drugim besedilom.
Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
delovanju Evropske unije
on the Functioning of the
in zlasti člena
, and in particular Article
[Sprememba 32]
[Amendment 32]
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. februarja 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 15 February 2011.
Uredba Sveta (Euratom) št. 3954/87 z dne 22. decembra 1987 o najvišji dovoljeni stopnji radioaktivnega onesnaženja živil in krme po jedrski nesreči ali kateri koli drugi radiološki nevarnosti UL L 371, 30.12.1987, str.
Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87 of 22 December 1987 laying down maximum permitted levels of radioactive contamination of foodstuffs and of feedingstuffs following a nuclear accident or any other case of radiological emergency OJ L 371, 30.12.1987, p.