natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
; 12. glede na količino razpoložljivih spletnih informacij o zakonodaji Skupnosti meni, da sodniki ne smejo biti usposobljeni le v zvezi z vsebino zakonodaje, ampak tudi glede učinkovitega dostopa do posodobljenih pravnih virov; 13. pozdravlja zavezo Komisije, da objavi povzetek pravnih aktov Skupnosti, namenjen državljanom, ter meni, da bi takšni nepravniški povzetki pravnikom prav tako pomagali do hitrejšega dostopa do zadevnih informacij; 14. spodbuja razvoj spletnih orodij in pobud na področju e-učenja, ki jih je treba, medtem ko niso popoln odgovor na usposabljanje, obravnavati kot dopolnilne k medosebnemu stiku med sodniki in učitelji;
; 12.Considers, given the wealth of online information available on Community law, that judges must be trained not only in the substance of the law, but also in how to access up-to-date legal sources efficiently; 13.Welcomes the Commission's commitment to publish citizens" summaries of Community legal acts, and considers that such non-legalistic summaries would also help legal practitioners to access relevant information more quickly; 14.Encourages the development of online tools and initiatives in the field of e-learning, which, whilst not being a complete answer to training, should be seen as complementary to face-to-face contact between judges and trainers;
poziva, naj bo prispevek EU k usposabljanju vseh članov sodstva na nacionalni ravni:
Calls for the EU component in the training at national level of all members of the judiciary:
dodatno okrepljen čim bolj na začetku z večjo usmerjenostjo v praktične vidike,
to be further strengthened from the earliest possible stage onwards, with an increased focus on practical aspects,
zajema metode razlage in pravna načela, ki so lahko domačemu pravnemu redu neznana, vendar imajo pomembno vlogo v zakonodaji Skupnosti;
to cover methods of interpretation and legal principles which may be unknown to the domestic legal order, but which play an important role in Community law;
ugotavlja vse večjo uspešnost programov izmenjave med člani sodstva; spodbuja evropsko mrežo za usposabljanje sodstva, naj poskrbi, da bo dostopna najširšemu krogu sodnikov, ter zagotovi ustrezno vključitev sodnikov iz civilnega, gospodarskega in upravnega okolja; pozdravlja dejavnosti mreže na področju jezikovnega usposabljanja in razširitev programa izmenjave na Sodišče, Eurojust in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;
Takes note of the growing success of the exchange programme for members of the judiciary; encourages the EJTN to make it accessible to the widest number of judges, and to ensure an adequate inclusion of judges from civil, commercial and administrative backgrounds; welcomes the EJTN's activities in the field of language training and the extension of the exchange programme to the Court of Justice, Eurojust and the European Court of Human Rights;
meni, da je razpoložljivost nacionalnih sodnikov za sodelovanje pri osnovnem in naprednem usposabljanju najpomembnejše logistično in finančno vprašanje za države članice; meni, da sodniki načeloma ne bi smeli plačevati nobenih stroškov za svoje usposabljanje na področju zakonodaje Skupnosti; zahteva, da Komisija Parlamentu zagotovi oceno stroškov za začasno nadomeščanje sodnikov, ki se udeležijo programov izmenjave, za vsako državo članico;
Regards the availability of national judges to participate in basic and advanced training as a major logistical and financial issue for Member States; considers, in principle, that judges should not have to bear any of the costs related to their training in Community law; requests the Commission to provide Parliament with estimates for each Member State of the cost involved in temporarily replacing judges who participate in exchange programmes;
ker je Komisija priznala, da ima EJTN dejansko monopol nad izvajanjem programa izmenjave za sodne organe, jo poziva, naj zagotovi, da se v postopkih, na podlagi katerih se uporablja EJTN za sredstva tega programa izmenjav, upošteva ta monopol; zlasti poziva, naj se te postopke poenostavi in s tem zagotovi, da bi bila sredstva na voljo pravočasno in bi EJTN tako lahko pripravil in izvajal učinkovit program, ki bo izpolnjeval pričakovanja in dane zaveze sodelujočim nacionalnim šolam, mednarodnim organom ter sodnikom in tožilcem; meni, da bi lahko bila v nasprotnem primeru vprašljiva verodostojnost programa izmenjav, kar bi škodovalo državnim sodnikom in tožilcem, ki v njem sodelujejo, in doseganju vzajemnega zaupanja v evropske pravosodne sisteme;
Taking into account the Commission's recognition that the EJTN enjoys a de facto monopoly for operating the Exchange Programme for Judicial Authorities, calls on the Commission to ensure that the procedures by which the EJTN applies for funds for that Exchange Programme reflect that monopoly situation; calls, in particular, for those procedures to be streamlined in order to ensure that funds are made available timeously so as to enable the EJTN to organise and run an efficient programme which meets the expectations of, and commitments made to, participating national schools, international bodies and judges and prosecutors; considers that, if this is not the case, the credibility of the Exchange Programme may be called into question, to the detriment of national judges and prosecutors interested in taking part and the advancement of mutual confidence across European judiciaries;
upošteva oceno Komisije, da je zdaj najprimernejša možnost za spodbujanje usposabljanja na področju evropskega sodstva finančna podpora različnim organom prek okvirnega programa za pravice in pravosodje za obdobje 2007–2013, ter da je mogoče ponovno odpreti vprašanje razvoja evropskih struktur za usposabljanje sodstva v primerjavi z drugimi oblikami, ko se program zaključi;
Takes note of the Commission's assessment that the most appropriate option for promoting training in the European judicial area is currently financial support to various bodies through the Fundamental Rights and Justice Framework Programme for 2007-2013, and that the question of developing European judicial training structures towards other forms could be raised again when that programme comes to an end;
poziva Komisijo, naj strogo oceni rezultate tega okvirnega programa glede na to resolucijo in oblikuje nove predloge za razvoj in raznolikost ukrepov za spodbujanje poklicnega usposabljanja sodnikov;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate rigorously the results of this framework programme, in the light of this resolution, and to formulate new proposals for the development and diversification of measures to promote professional training for judges;
vendar meni, da je zdaj čas za pragmatično institucionalno rešitev za vprašanje usposabljanja sodstva na ravni EU, ki v celoti uporablja obstoječe strukture, medtem ko se izogiba nepotrebnemu podvajanju programov in struktur; zato poziva k oblikovanju evropske akademije za pravosodje, sestavljene iz evropske mreže za usposabljanje sodstva in akademije za evropsko pravo; poziva, naj ta institucionalna rešitev upošteva zadevne izkušnje, pridobljene pri vodenju evropske policijske akademije;
Considers, however, that the time is ripe for a pragmatic institutional solution to the question of judicial training at EU level which makes full use of existing structures whilst avoiding unnecessary duplication of programmes and structures; calls, therefore, for the creation of a European Judicial Academy composed of the EJTN and the Academy of European Law; calls for this institutional solution to take account of relevant experience gained in running the European Police College;
meni, da nacionalni sodniki ne morejo zavzeti pasivnega odnosa do zakonodaje Skupnosti, kot je razvidno iz sodne prakse Sodišča v zvezi z nacionalnimi sodišči, ki na lastno pobudo odpirajo vprašanja zakonodaje Skupnosti Zadeve C-312/93
Considers that national judges cannot adopt a passive attitude to Community law, as made clear by the Court of Justice's case-law on national courts raising Community law issues of their own motion Cases C-312/93
[2002] ECR I-10875 in C-168/05
[2002] ECR I-10875 and C-168/05
poziva, naj se usposabljanje kandidatov za imenovanje na sodniške položaje okrepi od začetka, sorazmerno z navedenimi odstavki o državnih sodnikih;
Calls for the training of candidates for judicial appointment to be strengthened from the earliest point onwards and by analogy with the above suggestions and proposals concerning national judges;
Okrepljen dialog med nacionalnimi sodniki in Sodiščem
A reinforced dialogue between national judges and the Court of Justice
meni, da je postopek predhodnega odločanja temeljno jamstvo za skladnost pravnega reda Skupnosti in enotne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Considers that the preliminary ruling procedure is an essential guarantee of the coherence of the Community legal order and the uniform application of Community law;
poziva Sodišče in vse zadevne strani, naj dodatno skrajšajo povprečno dolžino postopka predhodnega odločanja, s čimer zagotovijo temeljno priložnost za dialog, ki bo privlačnejši za nacionalne sodnike;
Calls on the Court of Justice and all parties concerned to further reduce the average length of the preliminary ruling procedure, thus making this crucial opportunity for dialogue more attractive to national judges;
poziva Komisijo, naj razišče, ali nacionalna pravila o postopku pomenijo resnično ali možno oviro možnosti, da sodišče države članice sprejme predlog za sprejetje predhodne določbe, kot je določeno v drugem odstavku člena 234 Pogodbe ES, ter naj strogo obravnava vse kršitve, ki jih pomeni takšna ovira;
Urges the Commission to investigate whether any national procedural rules constitute an actual or potential hindrance to the possibility for any court or tribunal of a Member State to make a preliminary reference, as provided for in the second paragraph of Article 234 of the EC Treaty, and to pursue vigorously the infringements which such hindrances represent;
meni, da omejitve pristojnosti Sodišča, zlasti v zvezi z naslovom IV Pogodbe ES, po nepotrebnem posegajo v enotno uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti na teh področjih ter pošiljajo negativno sporočilo večini sodnikov, ki se ukvarjajo s temi zadevami, s čimer jim onemogočajo vzpostavitev neposrednega stika s Sodiščem ter ustvarjajo nepotrebne zamude;
Considers that limitations on the Court of Justice's jurisdiction, particularly those concerning Title IV of the EC Treaty, unnecessarily prejudice the uniform application of Community law in those areas, and send a negative message to the vast majority of judges dealing with such matters, making it impossible for them to establish direct contact with the Court of Justice and creating unnecessary delays;
obžaluje, da bodo po členu 10 Protokola o prehodnih določbah, priloženega Lizbonski pogodbi, pristojnosti Sodišča v zvezi z akti na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, sprejetimi pred začetkom veljavnosti pogodbe, ostale enake, kot so po sedanji Pogodbi EU, za prehodno obdobje petih let; vendar pozdravlja izjavo medvladne konference v zvezi s tem členom protokola ter poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj sodelujeta s Parlamentom pri ponovnem sprejetju tistih aktov na področju policijskega in sodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, ki so bili sprejeti pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe;
Regrets that, under Article 10 of the Protocol on transitional provisions annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, the powers of the Court of Justice with respect to acts in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters adopted before the entry into force of that Treaty are to remain the same as they are under the present EU Treaty for a transitional period of five years; welcomes, however, the declaration made by the Intergovernmental Conference concerning that article of the Protocol and accordingly urges the Council and the Commission to join with Parliament in re-adopting those acts in the field of police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters which were adopted before the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon;
glede uvedbe obveznega postopka predhodnega odločanja se strinja s Svetom, da je pomembno, da Sodišče zagotovi navodila, na katera se lahko sklicujejo nacionalni sodniki, ko se odločajo, ali naj zahtevajo nujni postopek;
In view of the introduction of an urgent preliminary ruling procedure, agrees with the Council that it is important for the Court of Justice to provide guidance to which national judges could refer when deciding whether to request the urgent procedure;
poziva Sodišče, naj preuči vse mogoče izboljšave postopka predhodnega odločanja, ki bi predložitvenega sodnika tesneje vključile v postopke Sodišča, vključno z boljšimi možnostmi za pojasnitev sklicevanja in sodelovanje pri ustnem postopku;
Calls on the Court of Justice to consider all possible improvements to the preliminary ruling procedure which would involve the referring judge more closely in its proceedings, including enhanced possibilities for clarifying the reference and participating in the oral procedure;
meni, da v decentraliziranem in zrelem evropskem pravnem redu državni sodniki ne smejo biti zapostavljeni, ampak jim je treba dodeliti več odgovornosti ter jih dodatno spodbuditi pri njihovi vlogi prvih sodnikov prava Skupnosti; zato poziva k preučitvi sistema "zelene luči", pri katerem bi lahko državni sodniki svoje predlagane odgovore na vprašanja vključili v vprašanja, ki jih posredujejo Sodišču, ki bi se lahko nato v določenem času odločilo, ali sprejme predlagano sodbo ali samo odloča na način pritožbenega sodišča;
Considers that, in a decentralised and mature Community legal order, national judges should not be marginalised but rather given more responsibility and further encouraged in their role as first judges of Community law; therefore urges consideration of a "green light" system whereby national judges could include their proposed answers to the questions they refer to the Court of Justice, which could then decide within a given period whether to accept the proposed judgment or whether to rule itself in the manner of an appellate court;
Pravni predpisi, bolje prilagojeni uporabi nacionalnih sodnikov
Laws better tailored to application by national judges
je seznanjen z oblikovanjem foruma za razprave o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja ter poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo forum svoja posvetovanja opravljal na pregleden način; je seznanjen z zavezo Komisije, da redno poroča Parlamentu in Svetu;
Takes note of the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice, and calls on the Commission to ensure that the Forum carries out its deliberations in a transparent manner; notes the Commission's commitment to report on a regular basis both to Parliament and to the Council;
vztraja pri potrebi po jasnejšem jeziku v zakonodaji Skupnosti ter večji terminološki skladnosti med zakonodajnimi instrumenti; zlasti podpira uporabo načrtovanega skupnega referenčnega okvira v evropskem pogodbenem pravu kot instrumenta za sprejemanje boljše zakonodaje;
Insists on the need for clearer language in Community legislation, and greater terminological coherence between legal instruments; supports in particular the use of the projected Common Frame of Reference in European contract law as a better law-making instrument;
odločno podpira vztrajanje Komisije pri tem, da države članice sistematično zagotovijo korelacijske tabele, ki kažejo, kako se direktive Skupnosti uporabljajo v nacionalnih predpisih; se strinja, da takšne tabele zagotavljajo koristne informacije ob najmanjših stroških in obremenitvah; razen tega meni, da korelacijske tabele povečujejo preglednost izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti ter dajejo nacionalnim sodnikom in strankam dejansko priložnost, da ugotovijo, ali je zakonodaja Skupnosti podlaga za določen nacionalni predpis, ter da sami preverijo, ali je bil prenos opravljen ustrezno, in če je bil opravljen ustrezno, kako je bil izveden;
Strongly supports the Commission's insistence that the Member States systematically provide correlation tables setting out how Community directives are applied in national regulations; agrees that such tables provide valuable information at minimal cost and burden; considers, moreover, that correlation tables increase transparency in the implementation of Community law and give national judges and parties before them a realistic opportunity to see whether Community law lies behind a particular national rule and to check for themselves whether, and if so how, transposition has been properly carried out;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in priložene dokumente posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču in Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the committee responsible to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, and the European Ombudsman.
ob upoštevanju sporov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) med Evropsko unijo (EU) in Združenimi državami Amerike (ZDA) zaradi domnevnih subvencij Airbusu in Boeingu,
having regard to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) disputes between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) on alleged subsidies to Airbus and Boeing,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o transatlantskih gospodarskih odnosih EU–ZDA UL C 298 E, 8.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations OJ C 298E, 8.12.2006, p.
ker ceni transatlantsko partnerstvo med EU in ZDA in na splošno podpira pravične in uravnotežene trgovinske politike,
whereas it values the transatlantic partnership between the EU and the US and supports fair and balanced trade policies in general,
ker so v zadnjem desetletju transatlantski gospodarski odnosi doživeli obdobje povezovanja, kakršnega še ni bilo, saj so evropske naložbe v ZDA predstavljale 75 % celotnega ameriškega priliva naložb v letu 2006, naložbe ZDA v Evropi pa so se povečale na rekordnih 128 milijard USD (128 000 000 000), kar je 59 % celotnega ameriškega tujega neposrednega odliva naložb v letu 2006,
whereas, over the past decade, the transatlantic economic relationship has experienced an unprecedented period of integration, with European investment in the US representing 75% of total US investment inflows in 2006 and US investment in Europe rising to a record USD 128 billion (128 000 000 000), or 59% of total US foreign direct investment outflows, in 2006,
ker je bila zaradi sporazuma iz leta 1992 v tem sektorju stabilnost ohranjena do leta 2004, ko so se ZDA enostransko odločile odstopiti od sporazuma in predložiti zadevo Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji zoper EU zaradi evropskega vračljivega financiranja, ki je v celoti v skladu s sporazumom iz leta 1992 in je podobno financiranju Boeinga, namenjeno za razvoj in proizvodnjo velikih delov modela 787 na Japonskem in v drugih državah, ki si delijo tveganje,
whereas the 1992 Agreement maintained stability in the sector until 2004, when the US unilaterally purported to withdraw from it and brought a WTO case against the EU, citing European repayable financing which fully complied with the 1992 Agreement and which is similar to that benefiting Boeing for the development and production of large parts of its 787 in Japan and other risk-sharing countries,
ker ponovno izraža svojo podporo Komisiji, ki je bila vedno naklonjena uravnoteženi in sporazumni rešitvi brez pogojevanja,
whereas it reaffirms its support for the Commission's consistent openness to a balanced, negotiated solution without preconditions,
ker je financiranje Airbusa s strani držav članic strogo omejeno, vračljivo z obrestmi in nima nobenega vpliva na konkurenčnost Boeinga, saj je Airbus povrnil 40 %, več kot je prejel od vlad držav članic od leta 1992, ter je doslej preplačal 7 milijard EUR,
whereas the Member States´ financing for Airbus is strictly limited, repayable with interest and clearly has no impact on Boeing's ability to compete, as Airbus repaid 40 % more than it has received from governments of the Member States since 1992 and has repaid in excess of EUR 7 billion so far,
ker EU oporeka številnim nedovoljenim in kaznivim ameriškim zveznim, državnim in lokalnim subvencijam za Boeing, ki znašajo 23,7 milijard USD v obliki nevračljivih subvencij za obdobje zadnjih dveh desetletij in do leta 2024,
whereas the EU is challenging various prohibited and actionable US Federal, State and local subsidies benefiting Boeing, totalling USD 23.7 billion in non-repayable subsidies over the past two decades and up to 2024,
ker zaskrbljeno opaža ostre napade Boeinga, ki želi vodstvo EADS in nekatere države članice prikazati kot "nezanesljive poslovne partnerje na letalskem in vesoljskem področju" ter kot varnostno grožnjo za vojaško pripravljenost ZDA; to sporočilo v Evropi ni ostalo neopaženo,
whereas Parliament notes, however, with deep concern, the bitter attacks by Boeing in an attempt to portray EADS operations and certain Member States as 'unreliable aerospace business partners' and a security risk to US military readiness, a message that has not gone unnoticed in Europe,
ker je poročilo urada za vladno odgovornost ZDA, ki podpira pritožbo na ponudbo Boeinga, priznano zgolj kot ocena postopka izbire in ne kot ocena letala; ker ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da bo neoporečnost postopka javnih razpisov ameriškega ministrstva za obrambo ostala nespremenjena za vse konkurente,
whereas the report of the Government Accountability Office sustaining Boeing's bid protest is recognised as an evaluation merely of the selection process and not the merits of the aircraft; whereas it reaffirms its belief that the integrity of the US Department of Defence procurement process will remain intact for all competitors;
na Komisijo naslavlja naslednja priporočila v imenu EU za zaščito interesov držav članic in obsežne civilne letalske industrije EU:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Commission, acting on behalf of the EU in defending the interests of the Member States and the EU large civil aircraft industry:
Parlament poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj zagotovijo, da se bodo Skupnost in države članice primerno odzvale na vse protikonkurenčne ukrepe v zakonodaji ali izvajanih politikah, ki bi neustrezno omejevali konkurenčnost podjetij EU pri civilnih ali vojaških programih;
Parliament calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure that any anti-competitive actions contained in legislation or in executive policy that would improperly restrict the ability of EU companies to compete in either civil or military programmes should be met with the appropriate response by the Community and its Member States;
Parlament v celoti podpira zaščito interesov EU v sedanjem postopku reševanja spora pri STO in poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za to; vendar dvomi, da bo odločitev STO zagotovila potrebno dolgoročno rešitev, ki je potrebna za trg kot osnova za prihodnjo mirno in pravično konkurenco v tem sektorju, do česar pa bi lahko privedla sporazumna rešitev;
Parliament fully supports the defence of EU interests in the pending dispute settlement proceedings before the WTO and urges the Commission to continue its efforts in this regard: it doubts, however, whether WTO rulings in themselves will provide the necessary long-term solution the market requires as a basis for future peaceful and fair competition in this sector which, by contrast, a negotiated solution could deliver;
Parlament meni, da mora biti izhodiščna točka za vse pogovore razprava brez postavljanja predpogojev za pogajanja, s čimer bi bila dokazana resnična namera obeh strani glede dosege pragmatičnega ravnotežja med civilno podporo EU in vojaško-industrijsko shemo ZDA, ki ureja tiste vidike vladnega posredovanja, ki se dejansko vtikajo v vzpostavitev resnične enakopravnosti.
Parliament considers that the starting point for any talks would need to be a discussion without preconditions on the terms of negotiation, demonstrating the genuine intent by both sides to arrive at a pragmatic balance between EU civil support and the US military-industrial scheme, which lays down those aspects of government involvement genuinely impinging on the establishment of a truly level playing field.