natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
posebej opozarja na možne nevarnosti za komunikacijsko vrzel med posamezniki različnega kulturnega izvora in na socialne razlike med večjezičnimi in enojezičnimi ljudmi; opozarja, da je v številnih državah članicah pomanjkanje jezikovnih spretnosti še naprej velika ovira za vključevanje v družbo in na trg dela za delavce, ki niso državljani teh držav; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za zmanjšanje razlik med večjezičnimi posamezniki, ki imajo v Evropski uniji več priložnosti, ter enojezičnimi, ki dobijo manj priložnosti;
Draws particular attention to possible dangers in the communication gap between individuals with different cultural backgrounds and the social divide between multilingual and monolingual people; draws attention to the fact that the lack of language skills continues to be a serious obstacle to the social and labour market integration of non-national workers in many Member States; urges the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to take measures to narrow the gap between multilingual people, who have more opportunities in the European Union and monolingual people who are excluded from many opportunities;
meni, da je treba podpreti učenje jezikov tretjih držav, tudi v EU;
Believes that support should be provided for learning third country languages, including within the EU;
meni, da je treba kazalnike jezikovnih kompetenc čim prej razširiti na vse uradne jezike EU, brez poseganja v njihovo širitev tudi na druge jezike, ki se govorijo v Evropski uniji;
Demands that the coverage of the language competence indicators should be extended as soon as possible to all the official EU languages, without prejudice to their also being extended to other languages spoken in the European Union;
meni, da mora zbiranje podatkov vključevati preverjanje štirih jezikovnih spretnosti, tj. razumevanja pisanega jezika, razumevanja govorjenega jezika, pisnega izražanja in ustnega izražanja;
Considers that the collection of data should include testing the four language skills, that is, understanding of the written and spoken language and written and oral expression;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si bolj prizadevajo za pospeševanje sodelovanja med državami članicami z uporabo odprte metode usklajevanja, da bi olajšale izmenjavo izkušenj in zgledov dobre prakse na področju večjezičnosti, pri čemer naj upoštevajo ekonomske koristi, npr. v večjezičnih podjetjih;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen their efforts in enhancing cooperation between the Member States by making use of the open method of coordination, in order to facilitate the exchange of experiences and good practices in the area of multilingualism, taking account of the economic benefits, for example in multilingual undertakings;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009 o Zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji in napredku razprave o prihodnji reformi kohezijske politike ( 2008/2174(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion and the state of the debate on the future reform of cohesion policy ( 2008/2174(INI) )
ob upoštevanju petega poročila Komisije z dne 19. junija 2008 o napredku gospodarske in socialne kohezije – Rastoče regije, rastoča Evropa ( KOM(2008)0371 ) (peto poročilo o napredku),
having regard to the Commission's fifth progress report of 19 June 2008 on economic and social cohesion - Growing regions, growing Europe ( COM(2008)0371 ) (Fifth Progress Report),
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 6. oktobra 2008 o teritorialni koheziji – Teritorialna raznolikost kot prednost ( KOM(2008)0616 ) (zelena knjiga),
having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 6 October 2008 on Territorial Cohesion – Turning territorial diversity into strength ( COM(2008)0616 ) (Green Paper),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2008 z naslovom "Regije 2020 – ocena prihodnjih izzivov za regije EU" ( SEK(2008)2868 ) (poročilo Komisije o regijah 2020),
having regard to the Commission staff working document of 14 November 2008 on Regions 2020 – an assessment of Future Challenges for EU Regions ( SEC(2008)2868 ) (Commission Report on Regions 2020),
ob upoštevanju členov 158, 159 in 299(2) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 158 and 159 and Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju četrtega poročila Komisije z dne 30. maja 2007 o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ( KOM(2007)0273 ),
having regard to the Commission's fourth Report of 30 May 2007 on Economic and Social Cohesion ( COM(2007)0273 )
ob upoštevanju Teritorialne agende Evropske unije - Za bolj konkurenčno in trajnostno Evropo raznolikih regij (Teritorialna agenda) in Leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih (Leipziška listina) ter izvajanja prvega akcijskega programa o izvajanju Teritorialne agende EU,
having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU - Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (Territorial Agenda) and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities (Leipzig Charter), and the First Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 21. februarja 2008 o četrtem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0068 .
having regard to its resolutions of 21 February 2008 on the fourth report on economic and social cohesion Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0068 .
(resolucija o četrtem poročilu o napredku), z dne 21. februarja 2008 o spremljanju izvajanja Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine: Evropskemu akcijskemu programu za prostorski razvoj in ozemeljsko kohezijo naproti Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0069 .
(resolution on the Fourth Progress Report), of 21 February 2008 on the follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: Towards a European Action Programme for Spatial Development and Territorial Cohesion Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0069 .
ter z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o vodenju in partnerstvu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0492 .
, and of 21 October 2008 on governance and partnership Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0492 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Evropskega omrežja za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON) z naslovom "Prihodnost ozemlja – teritorialni scenariji za Evropo" (poročilo ESPON) ter poročila Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom "Regionalna neskladja in kohezija: strategije za prihodnost",
having regard to the report by the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) entitled 'Territorial Futures − Spatial scenarios for Europe" (the ESPON report) and to the report of Parliament entitled 'Regional Disparities and Cohesion: what Strategies for the Future?',
ob upoštevanju sklepov konference o teritorialni koheziji in prihodnosti kohezijske politike v Parizu z dne 30. in 31. oktobra 2008,
having regard to the conclusions of the Conference on territorial cohesion and the future of cohesion policy held in Paris on 30 to 31 October 2008,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0083/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0083/2009 ),
ker vse države članice še niso ratificirale Lizbonske pogodbe, v kateri je teritorialna kohezija navedena med temeljnimi cilji Evropske unije, poleg ekonomske in socialne kohezije,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty, which enshrines territorial cohesion as among the fundamental objectives of the European Union alongside economic and social cohesion, has not yet been ratified by all Member States,
ker je koncept teritorialne kohezije impliciten v kohezijski politiki od njenega začetka in je bistven za njen razvoj; ker je postal ta koncept v Lizbonski pogodbi in zeleni knjigi vidnejši in izrazitejši,
whereas the concept of territorial cohesion has been implicit in cohesion policy since its inception and at the core of its development; whereas the Lisbon Treaty and the Green Paper have made that concept more visible and explicit,
ker ostaja kohezijska politika EU temeljni steber procesa evropske integracije in ena od najuspešnejših politik EU, ki pospešuje konvergenco med vse bolj raznolikimi regijami ter spodbuja rast in zaposlovanje; ker je kohezijska politika EU najbolj viden, otipljiv in merljiv izraz evropske solidarnosti in enakosti, na enakih načelih pa temelji tudi teritorialna kohezija kot del te politike,
whereas the EU cohesion policy remains an essential pillar in the process of European integration and one of the most successful EU policies, by facilitating convergence between increasingly diverse regions and stimulating growth and employment; whereas the EU cohesion policy is the most visible, tangible and quantifiable expression of European solidarity and equity, and whereas territorial cohesion, as an integral part of the EU cohesion policy, is based on the same principles,
ker najnovejša poročila o koheziji kljub precejšnjemu uspehu pri doseganju konvergence v Evropski uniji kažejo na trend večanja neenakosti med regijami EU, na primer v smislu dostopnosti, zlasti za regije EU v strukturno neugodnem položaju, pa tudi v neenakosti v posameznih regijah in na ozemljih EU, zaradi česar bi lahko nastala prostorska segregacija in bi se lahko povečale razlike med regijami EU v ravni blaginje,
whereas, despite significant progress made in terms of convergence in the European Union, the most recent cohesion reports highlight a trend towards worsening territorial disparities between EU regions, for instance in terms of accessibility, in particular for the structurally disadvantaged EU regions, but also at an intra-regional level and within EU territories, which could lead to spatial segregation and widen the differences in the levels of prosperity of the EU regions,
ker se je kohezijska politika EU že izkazala za uspešno, saj je omogočila pomembno medsebojno dopolnjevanje z drugimi politikami EU, da bi se povečal njihov vpliv na terenu in v korist državljanov Unije, medtem ko je na primer medsebojno dopolnjevanje med kohezijsko politiko ter raziskavami in inovacijami ali lizbonsko strategijo, kot tudi medsebojno dopolnjevanje na čezmejni ravni, že prineslo otipljive pozitivne rezultate, ki jih je treba utrjevati in širiti,
whereas the EU cohesion policy has already been successful in creating some important synergies with other EU policies with the aim of increasing their impact on the ground and for the benefit of citizens of the Union and whereas, for example, synergies between cohesion policy and research and innovation or the Lisbon Strategy, and synergies at cross-border level, have delivered tangible positive results that must be confirmed and expanded,
pozdravlja poglavitne sklepe javnega posvetovanja o prihodnosti kohezijske politike EU, predstavljene v petem poročilu o napredku; je zadovoljen nad velikim zanimanjem, ki so ga za to razpravo že pokazali različni akterji s področja regionalne politike, zlasti lokalni in regionalni organi;
Endorses the main conclusions of the public consultation on the future of EU cohesion policy, as presented in the Fifth Progress Report; is satisfied by the great interest that different stakeholders in the field of regional policy, in particular local and regional authorities, have already attached to that debate;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da so ti sklepi v veliki meri skladni s stališčem, ki ga je sam izrazil v resoluciji o četrtem poročilu o napredku; poudarja, da je bila ta resolucija prvi prispevek Parlamenta k tej javni razpravi;
Welcomes the fact that those conclusions correspond to a very large extent to the view expressed in its resolution on the Fourth Progress Report; recalls that that resolution represented Parliament' first contribution to the public debate;
ugotavlja, da stališče, ki ga je izrazil v svoji resoluciji o četrtem poročilu o napredku, zajema naslednja priporočila: prvič, zavrniti je treba vsak poskus ponovne nacionalizacije ter se je treba zavezati k enotni in prožni politiki EU, ki se bo lahko prilagajala najustreznejšemu obsegu ukrepanja ter spoprijela s skupnimi izzivi, kot so globalizacija, podnebne in demografske spremembe (vključno s staranjem, migracijami in upadanjem prebivalstva), revščina in oskrba z energijo; drugič, Parlament je trdno prepričan, da mora kohezijska politika EU zajemati vse regije EU, tudi tiste, ki imajo posebne geografske značilnosti, ter zagotoviti dodano vrednost za vse; tretjič, določiti je treba prednostne naloge za financiranje iz strukturnih politik in ukrepov EU, pa tudi sprejeti, s pridržki, opredeljevanje namembnosti; ter četrtič, potrebno je vzajemno dopolnjevanje in celovit pristop med različnimi sektorskimi politikami, da bi dosegli čim boljši rezultat za rast in razvoj na terenu;
Observes that the views expressed in its resolution on the Fourth Progress Report include the following recommendations: first, that any attempt for re-nationalisation should be rejected and that there should be a commitment to a single, flexible EU policy, capable of adapting to the most appropriate scale of intervention, which should also be in a position to address common challenges such as globalisation, climate change, demographic change (including ageing, migration and depopulation), poverty, and energy supply; second, a strong belief that the EU cohesion policy should cover all EU regions, including those with special geographical characteristics, and should import added value for everyone; third, that there is a need to set priorities in the spending of EU structural policies and actions and the endorsement, with reservations, of an 'earmarking' exercise; and fourth, that there is a need for synergies and an integrated approach between the different sectoral policies in order to achieve the optimal result for growth and development on the ground;
meni, da je teritorialna kohezija osrednji steber za doseganje ciljev kohezijske politike EU, saj krepi tako ekonomsko kot socialno kohezijo; poudarja, da teritorialna kohezija učinkovito prispeva k odpravi razvojnih neenakosti med državami članicami ter v samih državah članicah in med regijami; zato meni, da mora prihodnja reforma regionalne politike EU vključevati sklepe razprave o zeleni knjigi;
Believes that territorial cohesion is a central pillar for achieving the objectives pursued by the EU cohesion policy, by reinforcing both economic and social cohesion; stresses that territorial cohesion contributes effectively to closing the development gaps between but also within Member States and regions; considers, therefore, that the future reform of EU regional policy should incorporate the conclusions of the debate on the Green Paper;
pozdravlja sprejetje zelene knjige Komisije, saj je to odgovor na zahtevo, pri kateri je Parlament dolgo vztrajal; v celoti podpira odločitev o izvedbi analize teritorialne kohezije, ki je že dolgo v ospredju vseh razprav o regionalni politiki, pa čeprav Lizbonska pogodba še ni ratificirana;
Welcomes the Commission's adoption of the Green Paper, in response to Parliament's long-standing demand; fully endorses the decision to proceed with the analysis of 'territorial cohesion', which has long been at the forefront of any debate on regional policy, notwithstanding the fact that the Lisbon Treaty has not yet been ratified;
obenem meni, da so zastavljeni cilji v zeleni knjigi premalo ambiciozni, saj teritorialna kohezija in njen cilj nista jasno opredeljena ter ne zagotavlja boljšega razumevanja tega novega koncepta, da bi uspešno pripomogel k ublažitvi razlik med regijami; poleg tega obžaluje, da v tem dokumentu ni pojasnjeno, kako bo teritorialna kohezija vključena v sedanji okvir kohezijske politike oziroma s kakšnimi metodološkimi orodji in operativnimi sredstvi bo iz okvira načel postala intervencijski mehanizem, ki naj bi začel delovati v prihodnjem programskem obdobju;
Considers, however, that the Green Paper lacks ambition to the extent that it fails to propose either a clear definition of or an objective for territorial cohesion and does not advance significantly the understanding of that new concept, so that it can effectively contribute to the alleviation of disparities between regions; regrets, moreover that the Green Paper does not explain how territorial cohesion will be integrated into the existing framework of cohesion policy or with what methodological tools or resources it will be transformed from a framework of principles into operational mechanisms to be applied on the ground during the next programming period;
pozdravlja analizo v zeleni knjigi, kjer so opredeljeni trije ključni koncepti, ki bi morali biti v ospredju razvoja teritorialne kohezije: koncentracija, povezovanje in sodelovanje; meni, da lahko ti koncepti prispevajo k odpravi nekaterih temeljnih elementov, ki ovirajo skladen, uravnovešen in trajnosten razvoj Evropske unije, na primer negativne posledice koncentracije gospodarskih dejavnosti, zlasti v nekaterih nacionalnih in regionalnih prestolnicah, neenak dostop do trgov in storitev zaradi oddaljenosti, koncentracije ali pomanjkljive infrastrukture ter delitev zaradi meja med državami članicami, pa tudi regijami;
Welcomes the analysis in the Green Paper which defines three key concepts that should be central to the development of territorial cohesion: concentration, connection and cooperation; considers that those concepts can contribute to the solution on some basic obstacles that hinder the harmonious, balanced and sustainable development of the European Union, such as the negative effects associated with the concentration of economic activity, in particular in certain national and regional capitals, the inequalities in terms of access to markets and services that result from distance or concentration, lack of infrastructure, and the divisions that are imposed by boundaries between Member States but also regions;
meni, da zelena knjiga ne upošteva zadosti zavez iz teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine, zlasti kar zadeva načelo policentrizma ali novo partnerstvo med mesti in podeželjem, ki dajejo teritorialni koheziji strateško in operativno vizijo; zato meni, da morajo biti ti cilji v ospredju razprave o teritorialni koheziji;
Considers that the Green Paper does not take due account of the commitments made in the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter, which give territorial cohesion a strategic and operative vision, in particular as regards the polycentrism principle or the new urban-rural partnership; considers that those objectives need to be central to the debate on territorial cohesion;
pozdravlja pričetek javnega posvetovanja o teritorialni koheziji, kakor je bilo zahtevano v zeleni knjigi; meni, da je uspešnost javnih posvetovanj neposredno odvisna od čim širše udeležbe različnih zainteresiranih strani in civilne družbe; poziva pristojne nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe, naj brez odlašanja objavijo ustrezne informacije, da bi javnost ozaveščali o pomembnosti tega novega koncepta;
Welcomes the launching of the public consultation on territorial cohesion, as requested in the Green Paper; considers that the success of any public consultation is directly linked with the widest possible participation of the different stakeholders and civil society; calls on the competent national, regional and local authorities to disseminate, without delay, the relevant information, in order to raise awareness about the importance of this new concept;
meni, da je uskladitev vseh sektorskih politik EU z velikim teritorialnim vplivom temeljnega pomena za razvoj teritorialne kohezije ter okrepitev ekonomske in socialne kohezije; zato obžaluje, da so v omenjeni analizi v zeleni knjigi te politike EU zgolj navedene, niso pa predlagani načini za izboljšanje njihovega medsebojnega dopolnjevanja ali celo metode, na podlagi katerih bi bilo resnično mogoče meriti teritorialni vpliv teh politik;
Considers the coordination of all sectoral EU policies that have a strong territorial impact to be central to the development of territorial cohesion and the reinforcement of economic and social cohesion; regrets, therefore, that the relevant analysis in the Green Paper is confined to listing those EU policies without suggesting ways of improving synergies between them or even methods by which, in fact, to measure the territorial impact of those policies;
podpira odločitev, da se v zeleno knjigo ali javno razpravo ne vključijo podatki o morebitnih proračunskih in finančnih posledicah teritorialne kohezije; meni, da bi bila tovrstna analiza prezgodnja, dokler se tega koncepta jasno ne opredeli in dokler ga vse zainteresirane strani ne razumejo, da pa so razprave o tem vprašanju neločljivo povezane s celotnim procesom pogajanj in načrtovanja v zvezi s kohezijsko politiko EU v prihodnosti; zahteva, da se izid te razprave uporabi kot osnova za pripravo prihodnjega finančnega okvira;
Agrees with the approach of not including any references to possible budgetary and financial implications of territorial cohesion in the Green Paper or in the public debate; considers that such an analysis would be premature until the concept itself is clearly defined and understood by all stakeholders; considers, however, that any discussion on this issue is inseparable from the whole process of negotiating and planning the future EU cohesion policy; requests that the outcome of that debate will serve as the basis for the next financial framework;
meni, da je trdna in ustrezno financirana regionalna politika Evropske unije nujen pogoj za soočanje s prihodnjimi širitvami ter za ustvarjanje socialne, ekonomske in teritorialne kohezije v razširjeni EU;
Considers that the existence of a strong and well-financed EU regional policy is an indispensable condition for tackling successive enlargements and for achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion in an enlarged European Union;
Analiza koncepta teritorialne kohezije
Analysis of the concept of territorial cohesion
podpira stališče iz zelene knjige, da je namen teritorialne kohezije na podlagi načela enakih možnosti omogočati policentričen razvoj Evropske unije kot celote ter uravnotežen in trajnosten razvoj ozemelj z različnimi značilnostmi in posebnostmi, pri čemer se ohranja njihova raznolikost; podpira tudi stališče, da mora teritorialna kohezija državljanom omogočati, da lahko v celoti izkoristijo ter razvijejo prostorske vrednosti in potencial njihovih regij; poudarja, da je teritorialna kohezija horizontalen koncept, ki podpira razvoj Evropske unije, ter da mora teritorialna kohezija učinkovito prispevati k odpravi razlik v regijah Evropske unije in med posameznimi regijami ter tako preprečevati asimetričen razvoj; zagovarja stališče, da teritorialna kohezija vključuje tako kopno kot morje;
Endorses the position of the Green Paper that territorial cohesion, based on the principle of equal opportunities, is about ensuring the polycentric development of the European Union as a whole, as well as the balanced and sustainable development of territories with different characteristics and specificities while also preserving their diversity; also endorses the view that territorial cohesion should ensure that citizens are able to exploit to the full and develop the assets and potentials of their regions; places emphasis on the fact that territorial cohesion is a horizontal concept that underpins the development of the European Union ; strongly believes that territorial cohesion should effectively contribute to closing the gaps between and within the regions of the European Union and thus prevent the prospect of asymmetry; asserts that territorial cohesion has both a land and a maritime dimension;