natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker so bili 31. decembra 2010 v Moskvi po opozicijskih demonstracijah aretirani Boris Nemcov in okoli 70 drugih,
E. whereas Boris Nemtsov and some 70 others were arrested on 31 December 2010 in Moscow, following an opposition demonstration,
F. ker so neodvisni novinarji, aktivisti civilne družbe, odvetniki in zagovorniki človekovih pravic pogosto žrtev groženj in nasilnih dejanj; ker so protiekstremistična zakonodaja in nove določbe zakona o zvezni varnostni službi nejasne, zato se pogosto uporabljajo za nadlegovanje nevladnih organizacij, verskih manjšin in medijskih hiš,
F. whereas independent journalists, civil society activists, lawyers and human rights defenders have often been the victims of threats and acts of violence; whereas the anti-extremist legislation and the new provisions of the law on the Federal Security Service (FSB) are unclear and, as a result, are often used to harass NGOs, religious minorities and media organisations,
G. ker ruske oblasti še vedno niso razrešile primerov novinarjev Ane Politkovske, Natalije Estemirove in Anastazije Baburove ter smrti odvetnika Sergeja Magnickega,
G. whereas the cases of journalists Anna Politkovskaya, Natalia Estemirova and Anastasia Baburova and the death of lawyer Sergei Magnitsky have not yet been solved by the Russian authorities,
H. ker je predsednik Medvedjev večkrat zajamčil, da bo okrepil pravno državo, in zagotovil, da je njegova naloga ustvariti popolnoma neodvisna moderna sodišča, ki bodo dorasla gospodarski razvitosti države,
H. whereas President Medvedev has on many occasions pledged to reinforce the rule of law, stating that his task is to create absolutely independent modern courts that are in keeping with Russia’s level of economic development,
3. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi poročil o politično motiviranih sojenjih, nepravičnih postopkih in opustitvi preiskovanja resnih zločinov, kot so uboji, nadlegovanje in druga nasilna dejanja; poziva rusko sodstvo in organe pregona, naj učinkovito, nepristransko in neodvisno izvajajo svoje naloge ter privedejo storilce pred sodišča;
Expresses concern over reports of politically motivated trials, unfair procedures and failures to investigate serious crimes such as killings, harassment and other acts of violence; urges the Russian judicial and law enforcement authorities to carry out their duties in an effective, impartial and independent manner in order to bring perpetrators to justice;
6. obžaluje razganjanje miroljubnih shodov v zvezi s 31. členom ruske ustave, ki potekajo na zadnji dan vsakega drugega meseca , pa tudi večkratno prijetje vidnih članov opozicije, na primer Borisa Nemcova;
Deplores the breaking up of peaceful rallies held on the last day of every second month in relation to Article 31 of the Russian Constitution, as well as the repeated arrests of opposition figures, as in the case of Boris Nemtsov;
8. opozarja Svet ter visoko predstavnico na vrsto primernih ukrepov, ki bi jih lahko uporabili spričo sistematske zlorabe človekovih pravic in nespoštovanja pravne države;
Reminds the Council and the High Representative of the full array of appropriate measures they may bring to bear when faced with systematic human rights abuses and failures to uphold the rule of law;
10. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi precejšnjega števila prijavljenih kršitev človekovih pravic v Rusiji, vključno s pravico do mirnega zbiranja, in poudarja, da je trajen dialog o človekovih pravicah pomemben del posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah med EU in Rusijo, s posebnim poudarkom na ukrepih, ki jih ruske oblasti izvajajo za zagotavljanje varnosti zagovornikov človekovih pravic;
Expresses concern over the considerable number of reported violations of human rights in Russia, including the right of peaceful assembly, and emphasises the importance of continuous dialogue on human rights as part of the EU-Russia human rights consultations, with a special focus on the steps taken by the Russian authorities with the aim of ensuring the safety of human rights defenders;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu nujno predstavi oceno o tem, ali so sodni ukrepi proti družbi Yukos in njenemu vodstvu skladni z zahtevami, ki so bile Rusiji postavljene v zvezi z njeno željo po polnopravnem članstvu v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji;
Calls on the Commission to urgently submit to Parliament an assessment of whether the judicial measures taken against Yukos and its executives are compatible with the requirements placed on Russia in connection with its ambition to become a full member of the WTO;
14. ponovno poziva k okrepitvi posvetovanj na področju človekovih pravic, da bi bila učinkovitejša in usmerjena v rezultate, in sicer z udeležbo ruskih ministrstev za pravosodje, notranje in zunanje zadeve na sestankih v Bruslju in Moskvi ter s polno udeležbo Evropskega parlamenta na vseh ravneh; opozarja visoko predstavnico na proračunski sklep Parlamenta, da bo ustanovil forum civilne družbe;
Reiterates its call for the human rights consultations to be stepped up and made more effective and results-oriented, with the Russian Ministries of Justice, the Interior and Foreign Affairs taking part in the meetings in both Brussels and Moscow and with the full involvement of the European Parliament at all levels; reminds the High Representative of Parliament’s budget decision to set up a civil society forum;
16. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, vladi in parlamentu Ruske federacije, Svetu Evrope in Organizaciji za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the government and parliament of the Russian Federation, the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
PE459.635v01-00 } PE459.636v01-00 } PE459.639v01-00 } PE459.644v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o madžarskem zakonu o medijih
PE459.635v01-00 } PE459.636v01-00 } PE459.639v01-00 } PE459.644v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on media law in Hungary
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, povezanih s spoštovanjem, spodbujanjem in varstvom temeljnih pravic, zlasti svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter pravico do pluralizma medijev,
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) relating to respect for and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/13/EU z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah) UL L 95, 15.04.2010, str.
– having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive -AVMSD) OJ L 95, 15.4.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju Evropske listine o svobodi tiska z dne 25. maja 2009, delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralizmu medijev v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ), pristopa k pluralizmu medijev v treh korakih, kot ga opredeljuje Komisija, ter neodvisne študije, ki je bila izvedena za Komisijo in dokončana leta 2009,
– having regard to the European Charter on Freedom of the Press of 25 May 2009, to the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ), to the ‘three-step approach to media pluralism’ defined by the Commission, and to the independent study carried out on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 22. aprila 2004 o tveganjih kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji, zlasti v Italiji (člen 11(2) Listine o temeljnih pravicah) UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
– having regard to its resolutions of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information (Article 11(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
, ter z dne 7. septembra 2010 o novinarstvu in novih medijih – oblikovanje javnega prostora v Evropi Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0307 .
, and of 7 September 2010 on journalism and new media – creating a public sphere in Europe Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0307 .
– ob upoštevanju izjav Komisije, vloženih vprašanj Parlamenta in razprav v Evropskem parlamentu o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji 8. oktobra 2009 in 8. septembra 2010, ter razprav v Odboru za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 17. januarja 2011 v zvezi z madžarskim zakonom o medijih,
– having regard to the statements by the Commission, to the parliamentary questions tabled and debates held in the European Parliament on 8 October 2009, regarding freedom of information in Italy, and on 8 September 2010, and to the discussions held in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 17 January 2011 regarding the Hungarian media law,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, da pozove Agencijo za temeljne pravice, naj izda letno primerjalno poročilo o razmerah na področju svobode, pluralizma in neodvisnega upravljanja medijev v državah članicah EU, ki naj vključuje tudi kazalnike,
– having regard to the decision by the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to request the Fundamental Rights Agency to issue an annual comparative report on the situation with regard to media freedom, pluralism and independent governance in the EU Member States, including indicators,
A. ker je Evropska unija utemeljena na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države, kot je določeno v členu 2 PEU, in posledično jamči in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je določeno v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ter priznava pravno vrednost pravic, svoboščin in načel, kot so določeni v Listini o temeljnih pravicah, kar je dokazala tudi s podpisom navedene konvencije, po kateri sta svoboda in pluralizem medijev nujna pogoja, in ker te pravice zajemajo svobodo izražanja mnenj in svobodo prejemanja in sporočanja informacij brez nadzora, vmešavanja ali pritiskov javnih organov,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU, and consequently guarantees and promotes freedom of expression and of information, as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in Article 10 of the ECHR, and recognises the legal value of the rights, freedoms and principles as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which it has also demonstrated by acceding to the ECHR, for which media freedom and pluralism are essential prerequisites, and whereas these rights include freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without control, interference or pressure from public authorities,
B. ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, zlasti v Italiji, Bolgariji, Romuniji, Češki republiki in Estoniji, kot je bilo izpostavljeno ob nedavnih kritikah zakona o medijih in ustavnih sprememb, sprejetih na Madžarskem med junijem in decembrom 2010, ki so jih izrazile mednarodne organizacije, kot so OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, veliko število mednarodnih in nacionalnih združenj novinarjev, urednikov in publicistov, nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Komisija,
B. whereas media pluralism and freedom continues to be a matter of grave concern in the EU and its Member States, notably in Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, the Czech Republic and Estonia, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media law and constitutional changes enacted in Hungary between June and December 2010 which has been voiced by international organisations, such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, by a large number of international and national journalists’ organisations, by editors and publishers, by NGOs active in the areas of human rights and civil liberties, and by Member States and the Commission,
C. ker je Komisija izrazila pomisleke in od madžarske vlade zahtevala informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo madžarskega zakona o medijih z direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah in pravnim redom Skupnosti nasploh, zlasti kar zadeva obveznost uravnoteženega poročanja, ki velja za vse ponudnike avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, pri čemer je pod vprašaj postavila tudi njegovo skladnost z načelom sorazmernosti in spoštovanjem temeljne pravice do svobode izražanja in obveščanja iz člena 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, načelom države izvora in zahtevami za prijavo, ter ker se je madžarska vlada odzvala z zagotovitvijo dodatnih informacij ter izrazila pripravljenost za ponovni pregled in spremembo omenjenega zakona,
C. whereas the Commission has raised concerns and requested information from the Hungarian Government regarding the conformity of the Hungarian media law with the AVMSD and the acquis communautaire in general, notably in relation to the obligation to offer balanced coverage applicable to all audiovisual media service providers, and has also questioned whether that law complies with the principle of proportionality and respect the fundamental right to freedom of expression and information enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the country-of-origin principle and registration requirements, and whereas the Hungarian Government has responded by providing further information and by declaring its readiness to review the law and amend it,
in navedel, da nova zakonodaja ogroža pluralizem medijev, ukinja politično in finančno neodvisnost javnih medijev, dolgoročno utrjuje negativne elemente za svobodne medije, ter da sta organ za medije in svet za medije politično homogena Pismo predstavnika OVSE za svobodo medijev z dne 14. januarja 2010 Odboru za državljanske pravice, pravosodje in notranje zadeve.
, indicating that the new legislation undermines media pluralism, abolishes the political and financial independence of the public-service media and cements the negative features for the free media in the long term, and that the Media Authority and Media Council are politically homogeneous Letter of 14 January 2010 from the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media to the Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.
in izvajata razširjen in centraliziran vladni in politični nadzor nad vsemi mediji; ker nadaljnji pomisleki zadevajo nesorazmerne in izredno stroge kazni iz spornih ter neopredeljenih razlogov, nemožnost avtomatičnega postopka za prekinitev kazni v primeru pritožbe na sodišču proti sodbi organa za medije, kršitev načela zaupnosti novinarskih virov in varstvo družinskih vrednot,
and exert pervasive and centralised governmental and political control over all media; whereas further concerns include the disproportionate and extreme penalties imposed for debatable and undefined reasons, the lack of an automatic procedure for suspending penalties in the event of an appeal to the courts against a Media Authority ruling, the violation of the principle of the confidentiality of journalistic sources and the protection of family values,
E. ker se strinja s pomisleki OVSE v zvezi z organom za medije in svetom za medije, da so najspornejše značilnosti zakonodaje v nasprotju s standardi OVSE in mednarodnimi standardi o svobodi izražanja, na primer z odpravo politične in finančne neodvisnosti javnih medijev, področja uporabe uredbe (vsebinsko področje uporabe in ozemeljska veljavnost) ter odločitev, da se ne opredelijo osnovni pojmi, zaradi česar utegne postati nemogoče, da bi novinarji vedeli, kdaj kršijo zakon;
E. sharing the serious reservations expressed by the OSCE concerning the Media Authority and Media Council, the fact that the most problematic features of the legislation contravene OSCE and international standards on freedom of expression, for example by doing away with the political and financial independence of public-service media, the scope of the regulation (material and territorial), and the decision not to define key terms, making it impossible for journalists to know when they may be breaking the law,
F. ker je komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice pozval madžarske oblasti, naj pri pregledu zakona o medijih upoštevajo standarde Sveta Evrope o svobodi izražanja in pluralizmu medijev, ustrezna priporočila odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope, zlasti pa zavezujoče standarde iz Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;ker je navedel uporabo nejasnih opredelitev, ki jih je mogoče narobe tolmačiti, ustanovitev politično neuravnoteženega regulativnega mehanizma z nesorazmernimi pooblastili, ki ni v celoti sodno nadzorovan, ogrožanje neodvisnosti radiodifuzijskih medijev in spodkopavanje zaščite novinarskih virov informacij; ker je poudaril tudi, da morajo vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, vključno z opozicijskimi strankami in civilno družbo, imeti možnost smotrnega sodelovanja pri pregledu te zakonodaje, ki določa ta bistveni vidik delovanja demokratične družbe http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp .
F. whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner on Human rights has called on the Hungarian authorities to take account of Council of Europe standards on freedom of expression and media pluralism, the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and, in particular, the binding standards set out in the ECHR and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights when reviewing its media law; whereas he referred to the use of unclear definitions which are open to misinterpretation, the establishment of politically unbalanced regulatory machinery with disproportionate powers which is not subject to full judicial supervision, threats to the independence of public-service broadcast media, and the erosion of the protection of journalists’ sources; whereas he also stressed the need for all relevant stakeholders, including opposition parties and civil society, to be able to participate in a meaningful manner in the review of this legislation, which regulates such a fundamental aspect of the functioning of a democratic society http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp .
G. ker bi bilo treba zato nujno začasno odložiti izvajanje madžarskega zakona o medijih in ga pregledati na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Komisije, OVSE in Sveta Evrope, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bo povsem v skladu z zakonodajo EU ter evropskimi vrednotami in standardi o svobodi in pluralizmu ter neodvisnem upravljanju medijev,
G. whereas the Hungarian media law should consequently be suspended as a matter of urgency and reviewed on the basis of the Commission’s, OSCE’s and Council of Europe’s comments and proposals, in order to ensure that it is fully in conformity with EU law and European values and standards on media freedom, pluralism and independent media governance,
H. ker je kljub večkratnim pozivom Parlamenta k direktivi o svobodi, pluralizmu in neodvisnem upravljanju medijev Komisija doslej odlašala s tem predlogom, ki postaja vedno potrebnejši in nujnejši,
H. whereas despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on media freedom, pluralism and independent governance, the Commission has up to now delayed this proposal, which has become increasingly necessary and urgent,
I. ker bi morala kobenhavnska merila za članstvo v EU, ki so bila sprejeta junija1993 na Evropskem svetu v Kobenhavnu in ki zadevajo svobodo tiska in izražanja, podpreti vse države članice EU in jih uveljavljati prek zadevne zakonodaje EU,
I. whereas the Copenhagen criteria for EU membership, as established in June 1993 at the Copenhagen European Council, relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression should be upheld by all EU Member States and enforced through relevant EU legislation,
J. ker je Sodišče v združenih zadevah C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, v odstavkih 45 in 46 dosodilo, da dostop do informacij državljanom omogoča tesnejše sodelovanje v postopku odločanja, upravi pa v demokratičnem sistemu zagotavlja večjo legitimnost, učinkovitost in odgovornost državljanom ter je osnovni pogoj za učinkovito uveljavljanje njihovih demokratičnih pravic,
J. whereas in paragraphs 45 and 46 of its judgment in joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P the Court of Justice has held that access to information enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system and that it ‘is a precondition for the effective exercise of citizens’ democratic rights’,
2. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da zahteva pojasnila o madžarskem zakonu o medijih in njegovi skladnosti s Pogodbami in pravom EU, pa tudi o izjavah madžarskih oblasti, da so omenjeni zakon pripravljene spremeniti;
Welcomes the Commission initiative to request clarifications on the Hungarian media law and its conformity with EU Treaties and law and the announcement made by the Hungarian authorities in relation to their readiness to amend the law;
5. poziva madžarske organe, naj vključijo vse zainteresirane strani v revizijo zakona o medijih in ustave, ki je temelj na pravni državi temelječe družbe, z ustreznim ravnotežjem oblasti, s katerim se varujejo temeljne pravice manjšine pred tveganjem tiranije večine;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to involve all stakeholders in the revision of the media law and of the Constitution, which is the basis for a democratic society founded on the rule of law, with appropriate checks and balances to safeguard the fundamental rights of the minority against the risk of the tyranny of the majority;
8. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope ter vladam in n parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice in OVSE.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
PE459.646v01-00 } PE459.647v01-00 } PE459.648v01-00 } PE459.649v01-00 } PE459.650v01-00 } PE459.651v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o rastočih cenah hrane
PE459.646v01-00 } PE459.647v01-00 } PE459.648v01-00 } PE459.649v01-00 } PE459.650v01-00 } PE459.651v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on rising food prices
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. januarja 2011 o priznavanju kmetijstva kot strateškega sektorja v okviru zanesljive preskrbe s hrano Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0006 .
– having regard to its resolution of 18 January 2011 on recognition of agriculture as a strategic sector in the context of food security Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0006 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. septembra 2010 o poštenih prihodkih za kmete: bolje delujoča veriga preskrbe s hrano v Evropi Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0302 .
– having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2010 on fair revenues for farmers: A better functioning food supply chain in Europe Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0302 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010 o kmetijstvu EU in podnebnih spremembah Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0131 .
– having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2010 on EU agriculture and climate change Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0131 .