natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja na potrebo po politiki Skupnosti na področja priseljevanja in azila, ki bi temeljila na odprtju zakonitih kanalov priseljevanja in na opredelitvi skupnih standardov varovanja temeljnih pravic priseljencev in prosilcev azila v vsej Evropski uniji, kot je določil Evropski svet v Tampereju leta 1999 in potrdil Haaški program;
Draws attention to the need for a Community immigration and asylum policy based on opening legal immigration channels and defining common standards for the protection of immigrants’ and asylum seekers’ fundamental rights throughout the European Union, as laid down by the Tampere European Council in 1999 and confirmed by the Hague Programme;
ponovno potrjuje velike zadržke v zvezi s pristopom najmanjšega skupnega imenovalca v projektu direktive Sveta o azilnih postopkih in zahteva, da države članice ravnajo brez odlašanja pri prenosu Direktive 2004/83/ES;
Reiterates its deep reservations about the lowest common denominator approach in the draft Council directive on asylum procedures and calls on Member States to ensure prompt transposition of Directive 2004/83/EC;
Boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu
Combating organised crime and terrorism
- ne obstaja resnična evropska strategija notranje varnosti, ki bi opredelila otipljive cilje, odgovornost za njeno izvajanje in pričakovane rezultate ter objektivna merila za presojo izvedbe,
- firstly, there is as yet no genuine European domestic security strategy laying down tangible objectives, where implementing responsibility lies, what outcomes are expected and objective performance assessment criteria;
- da, po drugi strani, ne glede na odsotnost zastavljenih ciljev, ki bi jih dosegli na evropski ravni, države članice zahtevajo sprejetje splošnih ukrepov zbiranja in dostopa do podatkov, pa naj bodo le-ti operativni (ob uveljavi načela razpoložljivosti podatkov) ali pa povezani z vsakodnevnimi dejavnostmi posameznikov (potovanja, komunikacije);
- secondly, in spite of this vagueness as to the objectives to be realised at European level, Member States are insisting on the adoption of blanket measures to gather and access data - both data relating to operations (pursuant to the data availability principle) and data relating to individuals' daily activities (travel, communications);
sklene, da zaradi nerazpoložljivosti ustreznih podatkov o tej temi s strani Sveta zadolži svoj pristojen parlamentarni odbor, da preveri, kateri strateški in operativni ukrepi za boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu se trenutno izvajajo na evropski ravni; v luči tega bi moral Odbor LIBE do konca leta 2005 pripraviti predstavitve mnenj:
Resolves, given the lack of relevant information from the Council on this issue, to instruct its competent committee to check what strategic and operational measures are being taken at present at European level to counter terrorism and organised crime; takes the view that the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ought therefore, by the end of 2005, to hear:
- odgovorne osebe Sveta za ocene groženj (SITCEN) in v Generalnem direktoratu Evropske komisije za svobodo, varnost in pravico, zadolženem za politike boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu,
- the senior staff in SITCEN and the Commission's DG Justice, Freedom and Security with responsibility for policies on combating organised crime;
- odgovorne osebe iz Europola, Eurojusta in Olafa, da bi se seznanil s trenutnimi razmerami na področju sodelovanja med državami članicami in organizacijami Unije, kot tudi z verodostojnimi perspektivami za to sodelovanje,
- the management of EUROPOL, EUROJUST and OLAF so as to ascertain what the current position and credible outlook is with regard to cooperation between Member States and the Union's bodies;
- odgovorne osebe Interpola, da bi se seznanili s trenutnimi razmerami in perspektivami za sodelovanje med državami članicami, EU in njenimi agencijami ali sistemi za izmenjavo podatkov,
- the head of INTERPOL so as to ascertain what the current position and outlook is with regard to cooperation between that body and Member States, the EU and its agencies and information exchange systems;
- odgovornih pravosodnih in policijskih nacionalnih organov, da bi preveril dejansko raven sodelovanja med državami članicami, med njimi in EU ter njenimi agencijami (pri izmenjavi podatkov, skupnih ekipah, dvostranskih sporazumih),
- national judicial and policing authorities so as to ascertain what the true extent is of cooperation among Member States and between them and the EU and its agencies (data exchange, joint teams, bilateral agreements);
- najvišjih predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov, zadolženih za naštete teme;
- national-parliament representatives with responsibility for the issues referred to above;
poziva Komisijo, naj:
Calls on the Commission:
- opredeli novo pravno podlago Skupnosti za Europol in pred začetkom veljavnosti ustavne pogodbe predvidi oblike sodelovanja med to organizacijo in Eurojustom ter ustrezne oblike nadzora teh dveh uradov s strani Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov,
- to submit a Community legal basis for EUROPOL before the entry into force of the Constitutional Treaty and make provision for intensive forms of cooperation between it and EUROJUST plus appropriate forms of European Parliament and national parliament oversight over the two bodies;
- opredeli pravno podlago za to, da se sestavi evropski seznam posameznikov, skupin in dejavnosti, za katere veljajo omejevalni ukrepi v okviru boja proti terorizmu ter oseb, ki potencialno ogrožajo javni red (člena 96 in 99 Schengenske konvencije),
- to submit the legal basis for establishing a European list of persons, groups and activities subject to restrictive anti-terrorism measures and a list of persons potentially presenting a public-order risk (Articles 96 and 99 of the Schengen Convention);
- preuči možnosti uporabe takšnega seznama, pod pogojem vzajemnosti, v mednarodnih odnosih, zlasti z Združenimi državami Amerike;
- to consider the possibility of making use of those lists, subject to reciprocity, within international relations, in particular in dealings with the US;
Splošna politika nadzora, zahteve za sorazmernost ter varstvo podatkov
A policy of blanket surveillance, proportionality and data protection imperatives
podpira pristop Evropskega sveta k racionalnemu upravljanju s podatki, s katerimi razpolagajo Unija in države članice; vseeno opozarja, so bili vsi omenjeni sistemu osnovani z točno določenim ciljem in ob upoštevanju načela sorazmernosti, ki v demokratični družbi lahko utemelji omejitve njihove uporabe z vidika varstva podatkov;
Shares the European Council's approach seeking rational management of the information available to the Union and Member States; points out, however, all the IT systems processing information potentially relevant to the Union’s security policy were designed for specific purposes and with due regard for the proportionality principle, which in democratic societies, on data protection grounds, may justify placing constraints on their use;
opozarja, da ne smemo pozabiti na te omejitve, češ da je to potrebno zaradi novih zahtev v boju proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu, ampak se je treba vnaprej dogovoriti o želenih ciljih in posledično opredeliti podatke, ki so nujno potrebi za doseganje zastavljenega ter pristojnim organom omogočiti dostop do teh podatkov v ustreznem obdobju; ponovno poudarja svojo zahtevo po prehodu iz sistema «pull» na sistem «push» za posredovanje podatkov ameriškim organom ter zelo previdnega ravnanja glede vzpostavitve evropskega sistema PNR, za katerega naj bi bil pristojen Europol, kot je predvideno v obvestilu o centraliziranem upravljanju na evropski ravni s podatki, povzetimi iz evidenc potnikov v zračnem prometu, ki jih je obravnaval Europol ; zahteva od Komisije in Sveta, da pri vseh pogajanjih s tretjimi državami ali mednarodnimi organizacijami, še posebej s ICAO, upoštevata resolucijo EP z dne 31. marca 2004 o PRN;
Points out that those constraints cannot be brushed aside by simply invoking the new imperatives of the fight against terrorism and organised crime, but, rather, that there must be prior agreement on the objectives to be pursued and, consequently, the information which is essential to achieve what is sought must be defined and placed at the disposal of the competent authorities for an appropriate period; repeats its call to switch from a 'pull' system to a 'push' system for the transmission of data to the US authorities, and harbours the utmost reservations as to the establishment of a European PNR system to be placed under the responsibility of EUROPOL, as envisaged in the communication on European centralised management of data included in air passenger name records for processing by EUROPOL COM(2003) 826 . ; calls on the Commission and the Council to take into consideration Parliament's resolution of 31 March 2004 on PNR P5_TA(2004)0245. during all negotiations with third countries or international organisations, in particular the ICAO;
opozarja, da delovna skupina in evropski varuh osebnih podatkov iz odstavku 29 menita, da nacionalne pobude iz aprila 2004, ki obravnavajo izmenjavo podatkov za namene varnosti, niso povsem v skladu z EKČP in Listino temeljnih pravic Evropske unije;
Recalls that the Article 29 Working Group and the European Data Protection Supervisor consider that the national initiatives of April 2004 dealing with data retention for security purposes do not fully comply with the ECHR and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
poudarja, da mora stroške analize zbranih podatkov podpreti organ prosilec, da se izogne nesorazmernemu številu zahtev;
Stresses that the costs of analysing the data collected should be borne by the body requesting the data so as to avoid a disproportionate number of queries;
ki ga vlaga Armin Laschet
by Armin Laschet
o reformi OZN
on the reform of the United Nations
ob upoštevanju poročila "Varnejši svet: naša skupna odgovornost" Visokega odbora za preučitev groženj, izzivov in sprememb z dne 1. decembra 2004,
having regard to the report ‘A more secure world: our shared responsibility’ by the High‑level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change of 1 December 2004,
ob upoštevanju revizijskega poročila o projektu ciljev tisočletja in akcijskega načrta za dosego razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015,
having regard to the review report of the Millennium Project and the plan of action to achieve the Millennium Development Goals by 2015,
ob upoštevanju poročila "V večji svobodi: na poti k razvoju, varnosti in človekovim pravicam za vse" generalnega sekretarja ZN z dne 21. marca 2005,
having regard to the report ‘In larger freedom: towards development, security and human rights for all’ by the Secretary-General of the UN of 21 March 2005,
ker poročilo Visokega odbora vsebuje več kot sto priporočil v zvezi s spremembami in potrebo po reformi ZN, da se bodo ti lahko soočili z izzivi in grožnjami, ki segajo od revščine, nalezljivih bolezni, okoljske škode in nasilja nad civilisti preko terorizma in orožja za množično uničevanje do neširjenja jedrskega orožja; ker poročilo generalnega sekretarja poudarja in odobrava večino teh priporočil,
whereas the Report of the High-level Panel (hereafter RHP) makes more than a hundred recommendations on change and the necessity to reform the UN in order to address challenges and threats ranging from poverty, infectious diseases, environmental damage and civil violence to terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and nuclear non‑proliferation; whereas the Report by the Secretary-General (hereafter RSG) emphasises and endorses most of these recommendations,
ker poročilo Visokega odbora vsebuje novo vizijo kolektivne varnosti in se ukvarja z vsemi večjimi grožnjami mednarodnega miru in varnosti, ki jih čutijo po vsem svetu,
whereas the RHP puts forward a new vision of collective security and addresses all of the major threats to international peace and security felt around the world,
ker je generalni sekretar, opiraje se na poročilo Visokega odbora poziva k reformi politike in institucij Združenih narodov, da bodo kos izzivom, ki izvirajo iz novih groženj in v izogib njihovi oslabitvi zaradi povečane neenotnosti med državami in njihovih enostranskih ukrepov,
whereas in the Secretary-General’s view, following on the RHP, it is urgent that the policies and institutions of the United Nations be reviewed in order to rise to the challenge of meeting new threats and to avoid its erosion in the face of increased discord between States and unilateral action by them,
ker je v poročilu Visokega odbora nedvoumno navedeno, da bo uporaba sile, kadar bo potrebna, vedno zadnje sredstvo za reševanje sporov, ki ga je dovoljeno uporabiti le po ustrezni resoluciji Varnostnega sveta, izdani po načelih o uporabi sile, ter nedvoumno odobrava „pojavljajočo se normo“, da obstaja skupna mednarodna odgovornost za zaščito v primeru genocida in drugih obsežnih pobojev, etničnega čiščenja ali resnega kršenja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, katerih suverene vlade niso mogle ali niso hotele preprečiti,
whereas the RHP clearly states that the use of force, whenever necessary, should be deployed as a last resort, to be reiterated in a resolution of the Security Council on the principles relating to the use of force, and clearly endorses the ‘emerging norm’ that there is a collective international responsibility to protect in the event of genocide and other large-scale killing, ethnic cleansing or serious violations of international humanitarian law, which sovereign governments have proved powerless or unwilling to prevent,
ker je okrepljena večstranskost, ki temelji na ustreznih institucijah in učinkovitih postopkih odločanja ter izvrševanja najbolj primerno orodje za premostitev težav in groženj, s katerimi se sooča mednarodna skupnost,
whereas genuine multilateralism is the most appropriate tool for solving the problems and threats faced by the international community, provided it is based on well‑adapted institutions and efficient decision and enforcement processes,
ker je v poročilu generalnega sekretarja ZN poudarjena potreba po dosegljivih konkretnih ukrepih in takojšnji reformi ter predstavljen niz konkretnih ukrepov, ki so jih voditelji držav in vlad zmožni sprejeti do septembra 2005,
whereas the RSG stresses the need for action and immediate reform, and presents a set of achievable concrete measures to be adopted by Heads of State and Government by September 2005,
ker si morajo države članice EU najbolj prizadevati za zagotovitev univerzalnega sodelovanja pri večstranskih konvencijah,
whereas EU Member States must be in the forefront of efforts to secure universal participation in multilateral conventions,
Kolektivna varnost v 21. stoletju: preprečevanje, ozaveščanje in deljena odgovornost
Collective security in the 21 st century: prevention, awareness and shared responsibility
izrecno pozdravlja poročilo generalnega sekretarja, ki se ravna po poročilu Visokega odbora za preučitev groženj, izzivov in sprememb ter podpira temeljno odločenost, trajno in korenito preoblikovati Združene narode, da se bo ta organizacija lažje prilagodila novim razmeram na svetu in postala bolj učinkovita, pravična, dolgoročno usmerjena in odgovorna pri zagotavljanju kolektivne varnosti v 21. stoletju; še posebej pozdravlja stvaren pristop v obeh poročilih, v katerih je vizija v nasprotju s prejšnjimi predlogi reform primerno usklajena z dejanskimi in praktično usmerjenimi izvedbenimi ukrepi;
Warmly welcomes the RSG following on from the Report by the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Changes and strongly supports the underlying determination to achieve a consistent and thorough reform of the United Nations in order to adapt the organisation to new world realities and make it more efficient, equitable, geared to the long term and accountable in providing collective security in the 21st century; particularly welcomes the realistic approach of both reports, which, unlike previous reform proposals, adequately combine vision with concrete and practice-oriented measures for action;
poziva Svet, da v celoti potrdi poročilo o reformi, ki ga je predložil Kofi Annan, in poziva luksemburško predsedstvo, da sodeluje pri uresničevanju sklepa Sveta o skupnem stališču EU do dejanskih reform ZN;
Calls on the Council fully to endorse the reform report presented by Kofi Annan and calls on the Luxembourg Presidency to engage in achieving a Council decision on a common EU position towards concrete UN reforms;
odobrava stališče, da se mora napredek na področju razvoja, varnosti in človekovih pravic prepletati ter da se reforme Združenih narodov ne sme obravnavati, kot bi bila sama sebi namen, ampak kot neizbežno posledica poglobljene analize političnih in varnostnih meril ter dejavnikov, ki obstajajo v novih in negotovih svetovnih razmerah; zato se zavzema za krepitev sistema Združenih narodov in njihovih institucij, saj ti predstavljajo najbolj primerne in edine globalne institucije, ki so potencialno sposobne na zakonit in hkrati učinkovit način spodbujati in zagotavljati kolektivno varnost;
Clearly endorses the view that progress in the areas of development, security and human rights must go hand in hand and that the reform of the United Nations should not be viewed as an end in itself, but rather as the ineluctable consequence of an in-depth analysis of the political and security parameters and factors at stake in a new and uncertain world environment; thus recommends strengthening the United Nations system and institutions, since they constitute the most appropriate and only global institutions potentially able to foster and ensure collective security in a manner which is both legitimate and efficient;
odobrava stroge omejitve pri zakoniti samoobrambi in uporabi orožja ter odgovornosti za varstvo civilnega prebivalstva, kot jih je opredelil Visoki odbor v skladu z duhom in besedilom Ustanovne listine ZN in se strinja, da takšna opredelitev ustaviti preventivnih ukrepov Varnostnega sveta, tudi če bo igral bolj aktivno vlogo kot v preteklosti, saj je edini zakoniti organ za takšne ukrepe; ponovno opozarja, da je krizna zaščita učinkovita le, če imajo ZN stalna sredstva za nadzor in opazovanje, ki temeljijo etničnih, jezikovnih ali verskih napetostih z verjetnostjo, da se lahko razvijejo v krizo;
Approves the strict limitation of the notion of self-defence and the use of force and responsibility to protect civilian populations defined by the High-level Panel in accordance with the spirit and wording of the UN Charter, and agrees that such a definition should not prevent the Security Council from acting preventively – and even in a more proactive manner than in the past – since it is the only legitimate body for such action; recalls that there can only be effective crisis protection if the UN has the means to monitor and to observe on a full-time basis the ethnic, linguistic or religious tensions likely to degenerate into a crisis;
ponavlja, da mora Varnostni svet pred nameravano uporabo sile vedno upoštevati naslednjih pet meril zakonitosti: stopnja ogroženosti, pravilen namen, zadnje sredstvo, sorazmernost sredstev in dopustitev posledic; se strinja, da je treba načela o uporabi sile in njeno zakonitost podkrepiti z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta; predlaga, da se Varnostnemu svetu dovoli, da na osnovi posameznega primera za namen obravnavanja jasno določenih položajev prek omejenega časovnega obdobja prenese pooblastila iz oddelka VII Ustanovne listine ZN na priznano regionalno organizacijo;
Reiterates that when considering the use of force the Security Council should always take into account the five criteria of legitimacy: seriousness of threat, proper purpose, last resort, proportional means and allowance for the consequences; agrees that the principles relating to the use of force and its authorisation should be granted by a resolution of the Security Council; suggests that the Security Council be permitted, on a case-by-case basis for the purpose of dealing with a clearly defined situation over a limited period of time, to delegate its powers under section VII of the Charter to a recognised regional organisation;
podpira poziv Visokega odbora, kot je potrjeno v poročilu generalnega sekretarja, da se Mednarodni agenciji za atomsko energijo dodeli večjo vlogo in okrepljena sredstva, vključno s krepitvijo njenega organa preverjanja, v boju proti jedrskem širjenju in preprečevanju uporabe atomskega, biološkega in kemičnega orožja; močno podpira poziv, da se države zavežejo popolni usklajenosti z vsemi členi Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja, Konvencije o biološkem in toksičnem orožju ter Konvencije o kemičnem orožju, da bi še naprej krepili večstranski okvir za neširjenje in razorožitev ter tudi posebne predloge na tem področju;
Supports the High-level Panel’s call, as confirmed in the Report by the Secretary-General, to grant to the International Atomic Energy Agency an increased role and reinforced means, including the strengthening of its verification authority, in the fight against nuclear proliferation and in preventing the use of atomic, biological and chemical (ABC) weapons; strongly supports the call for States to pledge full compliance with all articles of the Treaty on Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention and the Chemical Weapons Convention in order further to strengthen the multilateral framework for non-proliferation and disarmament, as well as the specific proposals in this area;
podpira zagotavljanje dobave goriva, nujnega za razvoj miroljubne uporabe, kot je ureditev, v kateri bi MAAE imela vlogo garanta za dobavo cepljivih snovi civilnim uporabnikom jedrskega orožja po tržnih obrestnih merah za države, ki prostovoljno opustijo razvoj obogatitve domačega urana in obratov za ločevanje plutonija;
Supports the guaranteeing of the supply of fuel necessary to develop peaceful uses, such as an arrangement in which IAEA would act as a guarantor for the supply of fissile material to civilian nuclear users at market rates for States who voluntarily forego the development of domestic uranium enrichment and plutonium separation facilities;
podpira prizadevanja Združenih narodov, da bi izdelali strategijo za boj proti terorizmu, ki bo spoštovala človekove pravice in pravno državo, vključevala civilno družbo in temeljila na petih stebrih, katerih namen je odvračati terorizem ali ga ne podpirati, onemogočati teroristom dostop do finančnih sredstev in materialnih virov, odvračati države od podpiranja terorizma, razvijanje zmogljivosti za boj proti terorizmu na državni ravni in zaščita človekovih pravic;
Supports the forging by the United Nations of a strategy of counter-terrorism, which is respectful of human rights and the rule of law, which involves civil society and which is based on the five pillars of dissuading from resort to terrorism or support thereof, denying terrorists access to funds and material resources, deterring States from supporting terrorism, developing State capacity to combat terrorism, and defending human rights;