natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je pred nedavnim Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti s sodbami v zadevah Viking Line, Laval, Rüffert in Luxembourg omejilo pravico do stavke in kolektivnih pogajanj s trditvijo, da svoboščine notranjega trga prevladajo nad temi temeljnimi socialnimi pravicami; ker se na podlagi teh sodb minimalni standardi socialne zaščite iz direktive o napotitvi delavcev razlagajo kot maksimalni standardi, s čimer se daje prednost tekmovanju za čim nižje plače v istem kraju dela, državam članicam pa odreka pravica, da bi zahtevale ugodnejše delovne pogoje in plačilo za napotene delavce v okviru nacionalne zakonodaje,
whereas the recent judgements of the European Court of Justice on the cases Viking Line, Laval, Rüffert and Luxembourg restricted the right to strike and to collective bargaining by claiming the supremacy of internal market freedoms over such fundamental social rights; whereas these judgements interpreted the minimum social protection standards contained in the Directive on the Posting of Workers as maximum standards, thus favouring downward wage competition at the same workplace and denying Member States the right to require more favourable working conditions and remuneration for posted workers under national legislation,
ker je tak razvoj dogodkov močno prispeval k zelo razširjenemu javnemu mnenju, da je Evropska unija preveč naklonjena prostemu trgu in konkurenci ter zanemarja solidarnost in socialni napredek; ker se je zaradi poglabljajoče se krize glede legitimnosti Evropske unije povečal razkorak med evropskimi projekti, ki jih narekuje trg in podpirajo elite, ter dvomom številnih evropskih državljanov o dodani vrednosti evropskih politik za vsakdanje življenje in socialno blaginjo, kot je prek kratkim pokazala zavrnitev lizbonske pogodbe na Irskem,
whereas these developments strongly contributed to widespread public perceptions that the EU is leaning too far towards free markets and competition and is abandoning solidarity and social progress; whereas this deepening crisis of legitimacy of the European Union has led to a growing distance between a market-driven European project supported by its elites and the scepticism among large sections of the European population about the 'added value' of European policies for their daily lives and social wellbeing, as again recently expressed by the Irish 'No' to the Lisbon Treaty,
ker je glede na to ozadje obnovljeno socialno agendo, ki jo je pripravila Evropska komisija, treba razumeti kot poskus pomiritve jeze in nezadovoljstva velikih skupin prebivalstva zaradi sedanje neoliberalne usmeritve evropskega projekta povezovanja; ker pa t. i. socialni sveženj večinoma tvorijo nezakonodajna sporočila, poročila in priporočila, katerih prispevek k spodbujanju vidnega socialnega napredka v Evropski uniji je vprašljiv,
whereas, against this background, the 'Renewed Social Agenda' presented by the Commission must be interpreted as an attempt to assuage the anger and dissatisfaction of large swathes of the population with the current neo-liberal trajectory of the European integration project; whereas, however, the so-called 'Social Package' mainly consists of non-legislative communications, reports and recommendations whose effect in terms of promoting measurable social progress throughout the European Union is doubtful,
ker so zaradi monetarne in makroekonomske politike, in sicer pakta stabilnosti, neoliberalne lizbonske strategije in odločitev Evropske centralne banke, za obdobje od leta 2000 značilni počasna gospodarska rast in rast zaposlovanja, nespoštovanje dela, stalno visoka stopnja brezposelnosti, revščina, nestalna delovna mesta, razlike v dohodkih, pri čemer imajo vedno večji dobiček velike finančne in gospodarske skupine, ki črpajo koristi iz liberalizacije in privatizacije strateško produktivnih sektorjev in temeljnih javnih storitev,
whereas due to monetary and macro-economic policies, namely the Stability Pact, the neo-liberal Lisbon Strategy and ECB decisions, there have been, since 2000, slow economic and employment growth, a decline in the value attached to work, persistently high unemployment levels, poverty, precarious work and inequalities in income distribution, accompanied on the other hand by increasing gains to big financial and economic groups which benefit from the liberalisation and privatisation of strategic productive sectors and fundamental public services,
meni, da je socialni sveženj slabo zasnovan poskus, da bi pozornost javnosti odvrnili od politične naravnanosti Evropske komisije in Sveta v smeri nazadovanja na področju socialne politike, kar je med drugim razvidno iz načrtovane deregulacije delovnega časa, kot jo določa direktiva o delovnem času, ter pogubnih posledic nedavnih sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti o temeljnih pravicah in kolektivnih pogajanjih;
Considers that the 'Social Package' is an ill-designed attempt to distract public attention from socially regressive policy stances of the Commission and the Council such as the planned deregulation of working time as governed by the Working Time Directive and the devastating effects of the recent judgements of the European Court of Justice on fundamental rights and collective bargaining;
poudarja, da je Evropski parlament v prvi obravnavi revizije direktive o delovnem času pozval k postopni odpravi možnosti odstopanja; ostro kritizira, da je Svet s političnim dogovorom zavrnil to zahtevo; iz tega razloga nasprotuje dogovoru Sveta;
Points out that the European Parliament called for a phasing-out of the opt-out in its first reading on the revision of the Working Time Directive; strongly criticises the fact that the Council's political agreement rejected that demand; therefore states its opposition to the Council agreement;
vztraja, da bi morala biti vsaka revizija direktive o delovnem času, ki bi bila pomembna s socialnega vidika, osredotočena na usklajevanje poklicnega in zasebnega življenja s skrajšanjem maksimalnega dnevnega in tedenskega delovnega časa; poudarja, da je treba dokončno ukiniti možnost odstopanja, v celoti upoštevati sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti o času dežuranja in nadomestnem času počitka in jo vključiti v direktivo ter preprečiti vsako morebitno znižanje stopnje zaščite, ki jo določa veljavna direktiva;
Insists that any socially meaningful revision of the Working Time Directive must focus on the reconciliation of work and non-work life by way of shorter maximum daily and weekly working hours; underlines that the opt-out must be completely abolished, that the ECJ's case law on time spent on call and compensatory rest periods must be fully implemented and integrated into the Directive and that any lowering of the level of protection granted by the existing Directive must be blocked;
poziva Svet in države članice, naj podrobno razpravljajo o vprašanjih, ki so jih sprožile nedavne sodbe Sodišča; močno spodbuja Svet, naj zagotovi, da bodo socialne pravice prevladale nad svoboščinami notranjega trga; zahteva zelo natančno revizijo pogodb, da bi utrli pot socialni Evropi; meni, da bi se, če evropskim institucijam tega ne bi uspelo doseči, resna kriza legitimnosti današnjega evropskega ekonomskega in socialnega modela dramatično poglobila;
Calls on the Council and the Member States to thoroughly discuss the issues raised by the recent Court rulings; strongly urges the Council to take action to ensure the primacy of social rights over the freedoms of the internal market; therefore requests a thorough revision of the Treaties in order to open the road towards a Social Europe; considers that if the European institutions fail to deliver on this, the serious crisis of legitimacy of the current European economic and social model will deepen dramatically;
je seznanjen s prvim dvoletnim poročilom Komisije o položaju glede socialnih storitev splošnega interesa v Evropski uniji; vztraja, da je vprašanje storitev splošnega interesa naslednja pomembna točka, kjer je revizija pogodb nujna; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi morala primarna zakonodaja Evropske unije vsebovati jasne določbe o tem, da za javne dobrine, javne storitve, storitve splošnega interesa in nepridobitni sektor ne veljajo pravila o konkurenci, državni pomoči, javnih naročilih in notranjem trgu, ampak tvorijo sektor, ki ga vodi le javni interes in je organiziran po načelu subsidiarnosti, pri čemer izključno pristojnost za njihovo pravilno delovanje nosijo države članice ter njihovi regionalni in lokalni organi;
Takes note of the Commission's first biennial report on the situation of social services of general interest in the EU; insists that the issue of services of general interest is another important point where revision of the treaties is needed; in that respect emphasises the need for clear provisions in EU primary law indicating that public goods, public services, services of general interest and the non-profit sector are not subject to the rules on competition, State aid, public procurement and the internal market, but form a sector which is guided solely by the public interest and which is organised according to the principle of subsidiarity within the sole competence of the Member States and their respective regional and local authorities to ensure their proper functioning;
- da se Pogodbe ne sme razlagati tako, kot da na kakršen koli način vpliva na uveljavljanje temeljnih pravic, ki jih priznavajo države članice, vključno s pravico do stavke in kolektivnih ukrepov na nacionalni ravni, pa tudi čezmejnih stavk in kolektivnih ukrepov;
that the Treaty may not be interpreted as affecting in any way the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in Member States, including the right to strike and to take collective action at national level and also the right to cross-border strikes and collective action;
- da vedno, kadar bi bile zgoraj navedene pravice in pristojnosti držav članic ali sistemi odnosov med delodajalci in delojemalci v nasprotju z ureditvijo notranjega trga ali temeljnimi svoboščinami notranjega trga, prve (temeljne pravice itd.) prevladajo nad slednjimi;
that wherever the rights cited above and Member States' social policy competences or industrial relations systems might conflict with internal market regulation or the 'fundamental freedoms' of the internal market, the former (fundamental rights etc.) must prevail over the latter;
poudarja, da so zakonodajni projekti iz socialnega svežnja bodisi namenjeni poglobitvi liberalizacije notranjega trga, kot v primeru predlagane direktive o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, kar temelji na starih Bolkesteinovih predlogih za zdravstvo v okviru direktive o storitvah, bodisi glede spodbujanja socialnega napredka niso dovolj ambiciozno zastavljeni, kot v primeru predloga za revizijo direktive o evropskem svetu delavcev, ter zaradi tega niso ustrezno sredstvo za ponovno spodbuditev socialne Evrope, kot trdi francosko predsedstvo;
Points out that the legislative projects contained in the 'Social Package' either aim to increase the liberalisation of the internal market, as in the case of the proposed Directive on 'the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare', which is modelled on the old Bolkestein proposals on health care in the framework of the Services Directive, or lack ambition to promote social progress, as in the case of the proposal on the revision of the European Works Council Directive, and that therefore they are not adequate tools for 'restarting Social Europe' as the French Presidency claims;
poudarja, da so bile zdravstvene storitve z dobrim razlogom izvzete iz direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu, saj je zdravstvo del sistemov socialne varnosti, ne pa področje, kjer se lahko da prednost tržnim silam; poudarja, da ni potrebe, da bi zdravstvo uredili na podlagi pravil notranjega trga, niti to ni v pristojnosti EU; vztraja, da je treba vprašanja, ki jih je Komisija obravnavala v predlogu direktive, rešiti in urediti v okviru koordinacije sistemov socialne varnosti (uredba (ES) št. 883/2004);
Points out that health services have been excluded from the Directive on Services in the Internal Market for good reasons, as health care is part of social security systems and not a field where market forces should prevail; underlines that there is neither any need for the European Union to regulate health care on the basis of internal market rules, nor does it possess any such competence; insists that the issues addressed by the Commission's proposal for a Directive must be solved and regulated as part of the coordination of social security schemes (Regulation (EC) No 883/2004);
ostro kritizira predlog Komisije za direktivo o uveljavljanju pravic pacientov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva; poudarja, da ta predlog temelji na pristopu notranjega trga, njegov namen pa je predvsem omogočiti bogatejšimi in bolj izobraženim, da bi poiskali cenejše zdravstvene storitve v tujini; meni, da se s predlogom ruši enakost v sistemih zdravstvenega varstva, saj pacienti iz revnejših držav članic z nadomestilom ne bodo mogli pokriti stroškov zdravljenja kakovostne zdravstvene nege v bogatejših državah članicah;
Strongly criticises the Commission proposal for a Directive on the application of patients' rights in cross-border health care; points out that this proposal is based on an internal market approach and is mainly designed to enable wealthier and better educated people to go shopping for cheaper health care abroad; considers that the proposal undermines equality in health care systems, as the reimbursement for patients from poorer Member States will not allow them to cover treatment costs for high-quality health care in richer Member States;
ostro kritizira predlog Komisije za revizijo direktive o evropskem svetu delavcev, ki ni dovolj ambiciozno zastavljen; opozarja Komisijo na zahteve Parlamenta v zvezi z revizijo te direktive, ki jih je že pred sedmimi leti navedel v resoluciji z dne 4. septembra 2001 in niso bile upoštevane;
Strongly criticises the fact that the Commission proposal for the revision of the Directive on European Works Councils (EWC) lacks ambition; reminds the Commission of Parliament's demands for the revision of that Directive already stated seven years ago in its resolution of 4 September 2001, which have not been taken on board;
poudarja osnovne potrebe za revizijo direktive o evropskem svetu delavcev: izboljšana opredelitev obveščanja in posvetovanja (pravočasno pošiljanje pisnih in natančnih informacij) ter nadnacionalnih zadev, znižanje praga za ustanavljanje evropskih svetov delavcev, priznavanje vloge in pravic sindikatov, izboljšanje delovnih pogojev za evropske svete delavcev, učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračalne kazni za podjetja, ki se ne ozirajo na določbe direktive, in uvedbo pravice evropskih svetov delavcev do veta na načrte vodstva glede prestrukturiranja, združitev, prevzemov ali napotitev na čakanje, pri čemer je treba končno odločitev odložiti, dokler evropski svet delavcev ne predlaga drugih rešitev in se o njih podrobno ne posvetuje z vodstvom;
Emphasises the core needs for a revision of the EWC Directive: an improved definition of 'information' and 'consultation' (detailed written information provided in due time) and of 'transnational' matters, the lowering of thresholds for establishing EWCs, recognition of the role played by and the rights of trade unions and improved working conditions for EWCs, effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties for companies flouting the provisions of the Directive, and the establishment of a right for EWCs to veto management plans for restructuring, mergers and take-overs or layoffs, postponing any final decisions until the EWC has been able to propose alternative solutions and these have been discussed in detail between the EWC and management;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije o horizontalni direktivi, ki bi prepovedovala diskriminacijo izven zaposlovanja; ostro kritizira dejstvo, da zavarovalni in drugi finančni proizvodi ne bodo zajeti v direktivi, kar bo finančni in zavarovalniški industriji omogočilo, da nadaljujeta z diskriminacijo in zahtevata višje prispevke zaradi tveganja, povezanega z zdravjem starostjo, spolom in invalidnostjo;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission proposes a horizontal Directive outlawing discrimination outside employment; strongly criticises the fact that insurance and other financial products are not to be covered by the Directive, allowing the financial and insurance industry to continue with the discriminatory practice of demanding higher contributions because of risks related to health, age, gender and disability;
poudarja, da je treba državljanom tretjih držav omogočiti dostop do zaposlitve v Evropski uniji kot tudi enake pravice, še posebej glede plače, kolektivnih pogajanj in socialnega varstva; v okviru evropskih sklepov in okvirnih sklepov podpira vključitev vseh določb Mednarodne konvencije o varstvu pravic vseh delavcev migrantov in njihovih družinskih članov, ki jo je generalna skupščina Združenih narodov sprejela 18. decembra 1990; podpira zamisel o dovoljenju za prebivanje pri iskanju zaposlitve;
Points out that third-country nationals need to be granted access to employment in the EU, as well as equal rights, particularly in relation to salaries, collective bargaining and social protection; urges the inclusion, within European decisions and framework decisions, of all provisions established by the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 18 December 1990; supports the idea of a residence permit for job seeking;
ugotavlja, da je namen Komisije izboljšati opaznost in delovne metode strategije EU za socialno vključevanje in socialno zaščito ter okrepiti njeno povezovanje z drugimi politikami; vendar poudarja, da sta Komisija in Svet zavrnila poziv Parlamenta po uvedbi nove smernice za socialno vključenost, ki bi bila vključena v smernice za zaposlovanje v obdobju 2008 - -2010, in tako zavrnila, da se izboljšata opaznost in povezovanje z drugimi politikami;
Takes note of the Commission's aim to improve the visibility and working methods of the EU Strategy on Social Inclusion and Social Protection and strengthen its interaction with other policies; points out, however, that the Commission and the Council rejected the call by Parliament for the introduction of a new guideline on Social Inclusion into the Employment Guidelines 2008-2010 and thus refused to improve such visibility and interaction with other policies;
podpira predlog Komisije za določitev ciljev glede zmanjšanja revščine (revščine na splošno, revščine otrok, revščine med zaposlenimi ter dolgotrajne revščine), in njene predloge glede minimalnega dohodka iz pokojnin ali dostopnosti in kakovosti zdravstvenega varstva (zmanjšanje umrljivosti otrok, izboljšanje zdravstvenega statusa in podaljšanje življenjske dobe itd.) za naslednjo fazo strategije EU za socialno vključenost in socialno zaščito; vztraja, da je treba te cilje določiti tudi v zvezi z načrti za minimalni dohodek (60 odstotkov mediane ekvivalentnega nacionalnega dohodka) in minimalno plačo (60 odstotkov nacionalne ali sektorsko specifične povprečne plače), da bi se borili proti revščini in spodbujali socialno vključenost;
Supports the Commission's proposal to set targets for the reduction of poverty (in general and of child poverty, in-work poverty and persistent long-term poverty) and its proposals on a minimum level of income provided through pensions and on access to and quality of health care (reducing infant mortality, enhancing health status and life expectancy, etc.) for the next phase of the EU Strategy on Social Inclusion and Social Protection; insists that such targets must also be set in relation to minimum income schemes (60% of the national median equalised income) and minimum wages (60% of the national or sector-specific average wage) in order to combat poverty and social exclusion;
podpira cilj Komisije za spodbujanje koncepta dostojnega dela v notranji in zunanji politiki Evropske unije; poudarja, da je pomemben del koncepta dostojnega dela pojem svobodne izbire zaposlitve, ki jo je treba zagotoviti; zato vztraja, da morajo države članice pregledati politike trga dela, ki brezposelne silijo v slabo plačano in negotovo zaposlitev, ki je niso sami izbrali, ali pa morajo delati za prejemanje socialne podpore;
Supports the Commission's aim to promote the concept of Decent Work in the EU's internal and external policies; points out that one important pillar of the concept of Decent Work is the notion of 'freely chosen employment', which must be guaranteed; insists, therefore, that Member States revise labour-market policies which force unemployed people into low-paid, precarious employment not freely chosen by them or to work for their welfare benefits (workfare programmes);
podpira predlog Komisije za vključitev mednarodnih pomorskih delovnih standardov (konvencija MOD iz leta 2006) v evropsko delovno zakonodajo na podlagi evropskega sporazuma med delodajalci in sindikati v tej panogi; podpira tudi potezo Komisije za prednostno izvajanje konvencij MOD; vendar poudarja, da je sodba Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi Rüffert v nasprotju s konvencijo št. 94, ki izrecno omogoča usklajenost s kolektivnimi pogodbami, ki se zahteva v predpisih o javnih naročilih; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj konvencijo MOD št. 94 uvrstita na seznam prednostnega izvajanja;
Supports the Commission's proposal to incorporate international maritime working standards (ILO MLC of 2006) in European labour law based on the European agreement between employers and trade unions in that sector; also supports the Commission's move on priority implementation of ILO conventions; underlines, however, that the ECJ ruling in the Rüffert case contradicts ILO Convention 94, which explicitly allows compliance with collective agreements to be required in public procurement regulations; calls on the Council and the Commission to put ILO Convention 94 on the list for priority implementation;
soglaša s Komisijo, da je treba narediti več za zmanjšanje in odpravo razlik v plači glede na spol v Evropski uniji; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj dodatno okrepita pravni okvir, določita cilje za zmanjšanje razlike v plačah med spoloma med drugim glede dostopnosti poklicnega usposabljanja in priznavanja kvalifikacij in usposobljenosti žensk, razlike v plačah med spoloma pri zaposlitvi s skrajšanim delovnim časom in razlike v pokojnini, ter naj pri javnem naročanju spodbujata določbe o enakosti;
Agrees with the Commission that more action is needed to reduce and eradicate the gender pay gap in the European Union; calls on the Commission and the Council to further strengthen the legal framework, to set a target for reducing the gender pay gap also with regard to access to vocational training and recognition of women's qualifications and skills, the part-time gender pay gap and the gender pension gap, and to promote equality clauses in public contracts;
je seznanjen s poročilom Komisije o instrumentih in politikah Skupnosti za vključevanje Romov; poudarja potrebo po odločnih ukrepih za vključevanje Romov (akcijski načrt za Rome), k čemur je Parlament pozval v svojih resolucijah na to vsebino;
Takes note of the Commission's report on Community Instruments and Policies for Roma Inclusion; underlines the need for firm action for Roma Inclusion (a Roma Action Plan) as demanded by Parliament's resolutions on this topic;