natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker imajo vse razvite države kmetijsko politiko; ker nove okoliščine, kot je rastoče svetovno prebivalstvo, spremembe podnebja, vedno večje povpraševanje po energiji, vse manjša zaščita cen in večja odprtost na svetovni trg po eni strani postopoma vodijo k višjim tržnim cenam za kmetijske proizvode v EU, po drugi strani pa k močno povečanemu nihanju cen in donosa ter je treba zato bolj kot kdaj koli nadaljevati s skupno kmetijsko politiko;
whereas all developed countries have an agricultural policy; whereas new circumstances, such as the increasing world population, climate change, increasing demand for energy, a reduction in price support and greater openness to the world market are leading, on the one hand, to a rise in market prices for agricultural products in the EU and, on the other hand, to considerably wider fluctuations in yields and greater price volatility, and it is therefore more necessary than ever to continue with the common agricultural policy,
ker bo varnost zagotavljanja hrane (v kvantitativnem in kakovostnem smislu) skupaj z ohranjanjem ekosistemov ostala eden ključnih ciljev skupne kmetijske politike, brez katerih nista mogoči občutljiva in trajnostna proizvodnja ter optimizacija rabe tal v vsej EU,
whereas security of food supply (understood in both the quantitative and the qualitative sense) will remain one of the key aims of the CAP, alongside the preservation of ecosystems, without which there can be no sensible, sustainable production, and optimisation of land use throughout the EU,
ker si je EU močno prizadevala za zmanjšanje kmetijske porabe v celotnem proračunu, saj se je njen skoraj 80 % delež iz 70. let zmanjšal na 33 % do konca sedanje finančne perspektive, medtem ko se je skupna površina, namenjena kmetijstvu, od leta 2003 zaradi pristopa novih držav članic povečala za 37 %,
whereas the EU has made a considerable effort to reduce agricultural spending in relation to the total budget, as a proportion of which it has fallen from almost 80% in the 1970s to 33% by the end of the current financial perspective, while the total area given over to farming has increased by 37% since 2003, owing to the accession of new Member States,
ker so voditelji držav in vlad na vrhu v Berlinu obljubili, da bodo jamčili za skupne odhodke za prvi steber skupne kmetijske politike do leta 2013,
whereas the Heads of State and Government made commitments at the Berlin Summit regarding the guarantee of total expenditure for the first pillar of the CAP until 2013,
ker Akt o pristopu iz leta 2004 predvideva odstopanja od uporabe nekaterih pravil skupne kmetijske politike za nove države članice, da bi izravnali nižjo raven neposrednih plačil,
whereas the 2004 Act of Accession provides derogations from the application of certain rules of the CAP to the new Member States in order to offset the lower level of direct payments,
ker v nekaterih regijah ni drugih možnosti za nadomestitev nekaterih tradicionalnih oblik kmetijske proizvodnje, ki so pogosto ključne kmetijske dejavnosti v teh regijah in jih je zato treba iz nujnih razlogov, ki zadevajo okoljsko in regionalno politiko, ter za zaščito gospodarske in socialne strukture za vsako ceno ohraniti in podpirati, in sicer zlasti z vidika vloge, ki jo ima skupna kmetijska politike v t.i. konvergenčnih regijah, kjer sta poljedelstvo in živinoreja zelo pomembna kot instrumenta gospodarskega razvoja in ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest,
whereas there is, in some regions, no alternative to some traditional types of agricultural production, which often constitute key agricultural activities for the regions in question and must therefore be preserved and supported at all costs, on imperative environmental and regional policy grounds and in order to safeguard the economic and social fabric especially in view of the CAP's role in the so-called convergence regions, where agriculture and stockbreeding tend to be of major importance as an instrument of economic development and job creation,
ker mora biti kmetom v EU zajamčena stabilnost, ki bo preprečila, da bi njihova pričakovanja in naložbe propadli, medtem ko morajo regulativni sistemi v nekaterih sektorjih omogočiti srednjeročne in dolgoročne napovedi,
whereas farmers in the EU must be guaranteed stability so as to ensure that their expectations are met and that they are not defrauded of their investments, while in some sectors the regulatory systems need to allow for medium and long-term forecasts,
ker mora zakonodajalec EU preprečiti diskriminacijo kmetov in živinorejcev iz EU tako znotraj same EU kot tudi v primerjavi s konkurenti iz tretjih držav ali z ustreznimi instrumenti vzpostaviti enake možnosti za kmete in živinorejce iz EU (enake konkurenčne pogoje); ker je treba zlasti zagotoviti, da kakovostne, zdravstvene in okoljske standarde ter standarde dobrega počutja živali, ki so jih morajo izpolnjevati kmetje EU, spoštujejo tudi vsi, ki izvažajo kmetijske proizvode v EU,
whereas the EU legislator must avoid discrimination against EU farmers and stockbreeders both within the EU itself and vis-à-vis competitors from third countries, or use suitable instruments to create equal opportunities for EU farmers and stockbreeders (level playing-field); whereas, in particular, it should be ensured that the quality, health, environmental, animal welfare and other standards with which EU farmers are required to comply are also observed by anyone exporting agricultural products to the EU,
ker so cilji skupne kmetijske politike opredeljeni v členu 33 Pogodbe ES in ker bo, če bodo Lizbonsko pogodbo ratificirale vse države članice, soglasje Parlamenta potrebno za vse bistvene pravne in proračunske odločitve glede skupne kmetijske politike,
whereas the aims of the CAP are formulated in Article 33 of the EC Treaty and, subject to the full ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, all essential legal and budgetary decisions concerning the CAP will require the approval of Parliament,
ker zagotavljanje zanesljive preskrbe s hrano državljanom EU sodi med prednostne naloge in ker se to lahko najbolje doseže s kombinacijo podpore proizvodnje hrane v EU in uvoza v okviru pravil STO; takšna varnost zanesljivosti hrane je odvisna tudi od prispevka EU k ustvarjanju svetovnih zalog (ki so danes izredno majhne), kar EU omogoča, ne le da se zaščiti pred pomanjkanji, ampak tudi prevzame odgovornost v zvezi z zanesljivostjo preskrbe s hrano na svetovni ravni,
whereas guaranteeing security of food supply for EU citizens is a priority, and whereas this can best be achieved through a combination of supporting EU food production and through imports within the framework of the WTO rules; such security of food supply also depends on the EU's contribution to the building up of world stocks (which today are dramatically low), allowing the EU not only to protect itself against shortages, but also to take responsibility with regard to global security of food supply,
ker je treba glede na mednarodne okoliščine v zvezi s proizvodnjo in cenami surovin bolj natančno preučiti razvoj trgov in njegovih posledic na notranjem trgu,
whereas there is a need for more detailed reflection on the evolution of the markets and its repercussions on the internal market, given the international context regarding raw material production and prices,
vztraja pri konceptu trajnostnega, konkurenčnega in večfunkcionalnega kmetijstva, ki ohranja posebnosti vsakega posameznega sektorja in področja proizvodnje in katerega osnovni cilj je preskrba prebivalstva z zdravimi in varnimi prehrambenimi proizvodi v zadostnih količinah in po razumnih cenah za potrošnika;
Insists on upholding the concept of a sustainable, competitive and multifunctional agriculture, which maintains the specific character of each sector and area of production and whose basic objective is to supply the population with healthy and safe food products, in sufficient quantities and at reasonable prices for the consumer;
meni, da je bila reforma skupne kmetijske politike iz leta 2003 pri poglavitnih vprašanjih zelo uspešna, saj so močno porasle preglednost in učinkovitost skupne kmetijske politike ter lastna odgovornost in tržna usmerjenost kmetov, ter meni, da se mora ta proces nadaljevati na podlagi spoštovanja zaveze voditeljev držav in vlad iz decembra 2002, da se finančna sredstva za prvi steber kmetijske politike ohranijo v celoti do leta 2013; opozarja, da je treba še naprej močno poenostavljati upravljanje skupne kmetijske politike ter številne direktive in uredbe EU, ki imajo posledice za kmete, da se razbremeni kmete, čeprav ta poenostavitev ne sme privesti do ponovne nacionalizacije skupne kmetijske politike ali znatnega zmanjšanja pomoči, ki jih prejemajo kmetje v EU;
Believes that the 2003 CAP reform was, in key aspects, a great success as it markedly improved the transparency and efficiency of the CAP and the responsibility and market orientation of farmers, and believes that this process must be continued on the basis of respect for the undertaking given by the Heads of State and Government in December 2002 to maintain the first-pillar agricultural funds in full until 2013; points out that, in return, the administration of the CAP and the many EU Directives and Regulations which have an impact on farmers must undergo further, significant simplification so as to relieve the burden on farmers, although this simplification must not lead to a renationalisation of the CAP or to a larger cut in the aids received by farmers in the EU;
meni, da opustitev kakršne koli oblike urejanja v skupni ureditvi trga ni politično zaželena, saj so evropske in svetovne zaloge na dramatično nizki ravni, kot kaže trenutno stanje, kar negativno vpliva na kupno moč potrošnikov in prihodke kmetov, obenem pa spodbuja špekulacijo; poudarja pa, da je treba pripraviti instrumente proti morebitni spremembi konjunkture ali za soočanje z morebitnimi zdravstvenimi nesrečami ali nesrečami kot posledicami naravnih katastrof, ki so vse pogostejše zaradi podnebnih neravnovesij;
Considers the scrapping of all form of regulation within the CMOs to be politically undesirable since, as the current situation shows, European and global reserves stand at dramatically low levels, which is having negative repercussions on consumer purchasing power and farmers" incomes, while at the same time encouraging speculation; emphasises that, besides this, instruments are needed to combat a potential economic downturn and the risks posed by health incidents and increasingly frequent natural disasters arising from the unsettled climate;
zato pozdravlja tehnične prilagoditve, ki izhajajo iz zgoraj navedenega sporočila Komisije, namenjenega zagotovitvi delovanja reforme iz leta 2003, in poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru skupne kmetijske politike zagotovi osnovno ekonomsko načelo stabilnosti;
Welcomes, therefore, the technical adjustments arising from the above-mentioned Commission Communication aimed at ensuring that the 2003 reform works, and calls on the Commission to underwrite the basic economic principle of stability within the CAP;
poziva Komisijo, naj glede na prihodnje reforme izvede analizo stroškov in koristi skupne kmetijske politike, kar zadeva varnost zagotavljanja hrane, samozadostnost preskrbe in ohranjanje podeželskih skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj opravi analizo potencialnih stroškov za potrošnika zaradi višjih cen hrane, ki so posledica povečanega svetovnega povpraševanja, v primerjavi odhodki, ki jih kmetijska politika danes predstavlja za javnost;
Calls on the Commission, with a view to future reforms, to carry out a cost-benefit analysis of the CAP in terms of security of food supply, self-sufficiency of supply and the preservation of rural communities; calls on the Commission to undertake an analysis of the potential cost to the consumer of higher food prices arising from increased world demand vis-à-vis the expenditure represented today by agricultural policy for the public;
meni, da je izziv EU, kar zadeva pogajanja v STO, biti kos vsakršnim prihodnjim oviram na način, ki maksimizira njeno domačo blaginjo; poudarja, da mora prav EU najbolje izkoristiti prožnost, ki je na voljo, npr. ko gre za "občutljive proizvode"; vendar poudarja, da je treba za kakršen koli sporazum STO o kmetijstvu prej doseči sporazum o intelektualni lastnini, ki zajema geografske označbe in priznanje netrgovinskih dejavnikov kot uvoznih meril;
Believes that the challenge for the EU as regards the WTO negotiations is to match any future constraints in a way that maximises its domestic welfare; stresses that it is for the EU to make the best use of the available flexibility, e.g. in the case of "sensitive products"; stresses, however, that the condition for any WTO agreement on agriculture is to reach an agreement on intellectual property covering geographical indications and recognition of the Non-Trade Concerns as import criteria;
v okviru tekočih pogajanj STO poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva posebnosti kmetijske proizvodnje kot sektorja za proizvodnjo hrane in strukturnega elementa ozemeljskega ravnotežja, ohranitve okolja in zaščite ustreznih količinskih in kakovostnih ravni varnosti hrane;
Calls on the Commission, in the context of the current WTO negotiations, to take account of the specific characteristics of agricultural production as a food production sector and a structuring element for territorial balance, preservation of the environment and the safeguarding of adequate quantitative and qualitative levels of food safety;
meni pa, da mora imeti EU tudi v prihodnosti dovolj instrumentov za preprečevanje tržnih kriz in kriz v preskrbi v kmetijskem in zdravstvenem sektorju;
Considers, however, that the EU must still have sufficient instruments to be able to safeguard against market and supply crises in the agricultural and health sectors in the future;
poudarja, da je treba na učinkovit način in z ustreznimi sredstvi (finančnimi in drugimi) začeti s priznavanjem proizvodnih, okoljskih in podeželskih funkcij kmetijstva;
Stresses the need to proceed to the recognition, in an effective manner and by suitable means (financial and others), of agriculture's productive, environmental and rural functions;
načeloma podpira vključevanje splošnih ciljev v skupno kmetijsko politiko, zlasti ciljev varnosti zagotavljanja hrane, ozemeljske celovitosti ter varstva potrošnikov, okolja, podnebja, živali obnovljivih virov energije in biotske raznovrstnosti; vendar poudarja, da mora biti to del politike trajnostnega razvoja, ki združuje gospodarsko učinkovitost, ohranjanje naravnega okolja in virov, lokalni razvoj in socialno pravičnost; poudarja pa, da so voditelji držav in vlad potrdili cilje skupne kmetijske politike s tem, ko so bistvo člena 33 Pogodbe ES ohranili v Lizbonski pogodbi, podpisani 13. decembra 2007;
Supports, in principle, the integration of general aims into the CAP, in particular those of security of food supply, territorial coherence, the protection of consumers, the environment, the climate, animals, renewable energy and biodiversity; points out, however, that this must form part of a sustainable development policy combining economic performance, the conservation of natural environments and resources, local development and social justice; points out, however, that the Heads of State and Government have confirmed the aims of the CAP by retaining the substance of Article 33 of the EC Treaty in the Treaty of Lisbon signed on 13 December 2007;
poudarja, da vključitev splošnih ciljev v skupno kmetijsko politiko ne sme ogroziti proizvodnje poljedeljskih in živinorejskih proizvodov v gorskih, prikrajšanih, oddaljenih in otoških regijah EU, ki temeljijo na sistemih ekstenzivne proizvodnje in večinoma proizvajajo poljedelske in živinorejske proizvode za lokalni trg, vendar prodajajo te proizvode tudi na nacionalnih trgih držav članic;
Stresses that the integration of general aims into the CAP should not call into question the production of agricultural and livestock products in the mountain, disadvantaged, remote and island regions of the EU, which use extensive production systems, produce agricultural and livestock products in large measure for the local market but also sell such products on Member States' national markets;
meni, da mora EU v primeru, da uvede stroge zahteve za evropske kmete in proizvajalce, zagotoviti, da te zahteve izpolnjujejo vsi, ki izvažajo kmetijske pridelke v EU, ter da si mora EU prizadevati za vključitev že omenjenih splošnih ciljev v pogajanja v okviru STO;
Takes the view that, if the EU introduces stringent requirements for EU farmers and producers, it should ensure that those same requirements are met by anyone exporting agricultural products to the EU and that the EU must push for the inclusion of the general aims referred to above in the WTO negotiations;
odklanja zmanjšanje skupnega proračuna prvega stebra za obdobje do leta 2013 in opozarja, da kmetje v obdobju, ko se kmetijski trgi hitro spreminjajo in so reforme do polovice izvedene, nujno potrebujejo zanesljivost, varnost in spoštovanje odločitev, sprejetih leta 2003;
Rejects a reduction in the total budget of the first pillar for the period up to 2013 and points out that, at a time of sudden upheavals in agricultural and stockbreeding markets and with ongoing reforms at their mid-term stage, reliability, security and, in particular, respect for the decisions taken in 2003 are crucial concerns for farmers;
pri neposrednih plačilih odklanja vsakršno diskriminacijo glede na velikost in pravno obliko podjetij, vendar hkrati priznava, da mora vsaka prerazporeditev pomoči iz prvega stebra temeljiti na celostni oceni njenih učinkov na socialno in regionalno kohezijo, zaposlovanje, okolje, konkurenčnost in inovacije;
Rejects any discrimination according to farm size and legal form in the direct payments but acknowledges at the same time that all redistribution of aid in the first pillar must be based on a holistic assessment of its effects on social and regional cohesion, employment, environment, competitiveness and innovation;
poziva, naj bo pomoč namenjena izključno aktivnim kmetovalcem;
Calls for aid to be reserved exclusively for farmers actively involved in agriculture;
poudarja, da Komisija v svojem zgoraj navedenem sporočilu namenja premalo pozornosti težavam, potrebam in izzivom, s katerimi se sooča kmetijski sektor v 12 novih državah članicah, ter poziva, naj se to upošteva v prihodnjih reformah in naj se tudi razmisli o usmerjenem dodatnem financiranju za prestrukturiranje in modernizacijo;
Points out that the above-mentioned Commission Communication pays too little attention to the problems, needs and challenges facing the agricultural sector of the 12 new Member States, and urges that this be taken into account in the forthcoming reforms, and that targeted additional funding for restructuring and modernisation also be considered;
Neposredna plačila
Direct payments
meni, da so neposredna plačila tudi v prihodnje nujno potrebna za zagotavljanje dohodkovne osnove ne le v primeru tržnih neuspehov, temveč tudi za zagotavljanje oskrbe z javnimi dobrinami iz kmetijstva in kot nadomestilo za evropske standarde na področju varstva okolja, varnosti hrane in preskrbe s hrano, sledljivosti, dobrega počutja živali ter socialnega varstva, ki so v mednarodni primerjavi zelo visoki;
Considers that direct payments will remain vitally necessary in the future as a basic income guarantee, not only in the event of market failure but also for the provision of public goods by farmers and as compensation for Europe's environmental, food safety and security, traceability, animal welfare and social standards, which are very high by international comparison;
po drugi strani ugotavlja, da višina plačil ni vedno sorazmerna s prizadevanji kmetov za izpolnjevanje zahtev, ker so plačila še vedno v veliki meri odvisna od pretekle porabe;
Notes, however, that the level of payments does not always seem to be in balance with the compliance efforts made by the farmers concerned, because payments still depend to a large extent on historic spending;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o oceni dodatnih stroškov, ki jih imajo kmetje zaradi izpolnjevanja skupnih standardov na področju varstva okolja, dobrega počutja živali in varnosti hrane v primerjavi z njihovimi glavnimi konkurenti na svetovnem trgu; poročilo mora tudi primerjati te stroške z dejanskimi zneski neposrednih plačil, ki jih prejmejo kmetje; poročilo mora biti dovolj specifično za različne kmete iz posameznih držav članic; poročilo mora biti objavljeno, preden se začnejo postopki odločanja o skupni kmetijski politiki za obdobje po letu 2013;
Calls, therefore, for a report by the Commission, which should assess the extra costs which farmers incur due to their compliance with the common standards in the field of the environment, animal welfare and food safety in comparison with their main competitors on the world market; the report should further compare these costs with the actual amount received by farmers in direct payments; the report should be sufficiently specific for different kinds of farmers in the separate Member States; the report should also be published before the decision-making procedures for the common agricultural policy after 2013 start;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije, se na prostovoljni osnovi omogoči državam članicam večjo prožnost pri ločitvi neposrednih plačil od zgodovinskih referenčnih vrednosti in prehodu na bolj pavšalen sistem, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ob predložitvi zakonodajnega predloga pojasni, ali je glede na pozitivne izkušnje v državah članicah možen pospešen prehod na enotno regionalno ali nacionalno premijo na površino ločenih plačil, ki bi bila za države članice prostovoljna, že do leta 2013; vendar meni, da lahko tiste države članice, v katerih že velja polna (ali delna) ločitev na osnovi preteklih plačil, obdržijo veljavni sistem do leta 2013; poziva Komisijo, naj izpelje študijo o možnih učinkih premije na površino, zlasti za kmetije z visoko gostoto živine na razmeroma majhni površini;
Welcomes the proposal of the Commission to allow Member States, on a voluntary basis, more flexibility in moving towards a separation of direct payments from historical reference values and towards a flatter system, and calls on the Commission to clarify, together with the submission of the legislative proposal, whether in view of positive experience in the Member States a faster transition to an area-based regional or national single premium of decoupled payments would be feasible for Member States on a voluntary basis by 2013; notes, however, that those Member States with full (or partial) decoupling based on historical payments may choose to leave this system in place until 2013; calls on the Commission to undertake a study of the potential impact of an area-based premium, in particular with regard to farms with high livestock densities on comparatively small areas;
poudarja, da je treba pri odločitvi za prehod na regionalni model upoštevati težave, ki bodo nastale zaradi posebne narave specifičnih pravic za živinorejo, tj. da nekateri živinorejci nimajo kmetijskega zemljišča ali ga imajo zelo malo ter da ekstenzivna živinoreja v mnogih regijah v EU temelji na skupni rabi pašnikov, ki so v lasti občin, skupnosti ali vladnih organov;
Stresses that, by opting for a transition to a regional model, account should be taken of the difficulties arising from the particular nature of specific rights for livestock farming, i.e. the fact that some livestock farmers do not have any, or have only a small area of agricultural land, and also the fact that extensive livestock farming in many regions within the EU is based on collective use of commonly held grazing land, which belongs to municipalities, communities or government bodies;