natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker je sklep držav članic EU jasen pokazatelj solidarnosti in enotnosti EU pri zunanjih zadevah in bosta učinkovitost dejanj EU ter uspešno spodbujanje in izvajanje evropskih vrednot v EU in zunaj nje odvisna od odločne zavezanosti skupnemu delovanju;
G. whereas the decision of the EU member states is a clear sign of solidarity and unity of the EU in foreign affairs matters and effectiveness of the EU actions and successful promotion of European values inside as well as outside the EU and its successful implementation will depend on its firm commitment to act united;
H. ker politika EU glede Belorusije še vedno temelji na pogoju, da morajo beloruske oblasti za izboljšanje odnosov med EU in Belorusijo izpustiti vse politične zapornike;
H. whereas the EU policy towards Belarus remains based on conditionality whereas the Belarusian authorities to improve EU-Belarus relations by releasing all the political prisoners;
I. ker je izboljšanje dvostranskih odnosov z Evropsko unijo odvisno tudi od napredka vlade Belorusije pri izpolnjevanju obvez v okviru Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter spoštovanja temeljnih človekovih pravic, pravne države in demokratičnih načel; vključno z izpustitvijo političnih zapornikov; ker bi bila posledica povečanje samoizolacije, ki bi vplivala na belorusko ljudstvo in vodila k večji odvisnosti od Rusije;
I. whereas the improvement of bilateral relations with the European Union is also conditional on progress by the Government of Belarus towards the fulfilment of its OSCE commitments and the respect for fundamental human rights, the rule of law and democratic principles; including the release of political prisoners; whereas as a consequences increase its self-isolation, which would affect the Belarusian people and also lead to a stronger dependence on Russia;
K. ker je EU z 38 % največja trgovska partnerica za beloruski izvoz; ker je bil presežek Belorusije pri trgovanju z EU v letu 2011 približno 6 milijard USD;
K. whereas the EU is the largest trade partner for Belarus exports with 38%; whereas the Belarusian trade surplus with the EU was about $ 6 billion in 2011;
L. ker države članice EU niso dosegle soglasja o sankcijah za vplivne poslovneže, ki so tesno povezani z režimom in ga podpirajo;
L. whereas EU Members States could not reach an agreement on the sanctioning of so called bagmen, influential businessmen that are closely linked to and supporting the regime;
2. poudarja, da bi lahko odločna zavezanost vseh držav članic EU ter drugih demokratičnih držav k skupnemu delovanju v času stiske pripomogla k uspešnemu spodbujanju splošnih vrednot v državah, kot je Belorusija, in te države približala prehodu v demokracijo;
Emphasise that a firm commitment of all EU member states as well as other democratic countries to act united in times of need may foster a successful promotion of universal values in such countries as Belarus and bring these countries closer towards the path of democratic transition;
9. istočasno poziva EU, naj okrepi svoje sodelovanje z belorusko civilno družbo in odnose z opozicijo ter podpre demokratična prizadevanja beloruskega ljudstva;
Calls on the EU at the same time to strengthen its engagement with Belarusian civil society, enhance its ties with the opposition and support democratic aspirations of the Belarusian people;
13.3.2012 B7-0183/2012 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko
13.3.2012 B7-0183/2012 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
PE486.722v01-00 B7‑0183/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Belorusiji ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
PE486.722v01-00 B7‑0183/2012 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Belarus ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2010/639/SZVP, kakor se izvaja z izvedbenim sklepom Sveta 2012/126/SZVP, ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 765/2006, kakor se izvaja z izvedbeno uredbo Sveta (EU) št. 170/2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Belorusiji,
– having regard to the Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2012/126/CFSP, and Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 170/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta 2011/69/SZVP s spremembi seznama posameznikov, za katere se uporabljajo omejevalni ukrepi, da se vključijo odgovorni za kršenje mednarodnih volilnih standardov med predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji 19. decembra 2010,
– having regard to the Council Decision 2011/69/CFSP amending the list of individuals to restrictive measures to include persons responsible for the violations of international electoral standards in the presidential elections in Belarus on 19 December 2010,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije Organizacije združenih narodov proti mučenju in drugemu okrutnemu, nečloveškemu ali ponižujočemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju, katere podpisnica je tudi Belorusija,
– having regard to the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment to which Belarus is a state party,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o Belorusiji, sprejetih na 3065. zasedanju Sveta za zunanje zadeve v Bruslju 31. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the Council conclusions on Belarus adopted at the 3065th Foreign Affairs Council meeting in Brussels on 31 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izjave z vrhunskega srečanja vzhodnega partnerstva, ki je od 7. do 9. maja 2009 potekalo v Pragi, in izjave o razmerah v Belorusiji, sprejete 30. septembra 2011 na vrhunskem srečanju vzhodnega partnerstva v Varšavi,
– having regard to the Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit in Prague 7‑9 May 2009 and the Declaration on the situation in Belarus, adopted on the occasion of the Eastern Partnership Summit, Warsaw, 30 September 2011,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope št. 1857(2012) z dne 25. januarja 2012 o razmerah v Belorusiji,
– having regard to the Council of European Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1857(2012) on the situation in Belarus of 25 January 2012,
A. ker so bili s sklepom Sveta 2012/126/SZVP omejevalni ukrepi proti Belorusiji razširjeni na devetnajst sodnikov in tožilcev ter dva policijska uradnika, ki naj bi bili odgovorni za zatiranje demokratične opozicije in aktivistov civilne družbe; ker je s temi sankcijami soglašalo 27 zunanjih ministrov EU;
A. whereas in the Council Decision 2012/126/CFSP restrictive measures on Belarus were expended on nineteen judges and prosecutors and two police officials deemed responsible for repressing the democratic opposition and civil society activists; whereas these sanctions were agreed by the 27 EU foreign ministers;
B. ker so beloruske oblasti 28. februarja 2012 pozvale veleposlanika EU in Poljske v Minsku, naj zapustita državo, ter na posvetovanja v Minsk poklicale vodji svojih diplomatskih predstavništev pri Evropski uniji in v Varšavi;
B. whereas on 28 February 2012 the Belarusian authorities called on the EU and Polish ambassadors in Minsk to leave the country and called back the heads of their diplomatic institutions to the European Union and Warsaw for consultations to Minsk;
C. ker je Evropska unija istega dne v odgovor na ukrep beloruskih oblasti sklenila na posvetovanja poklicati vse veleposlanike držav članic EU v Minsku;
C. whereas in response to the action of Belarusian authorities on the same day the EU decided to appeal to a consultation of all the ambassadors of EU member states in Minsk;
D. ker je Evropska unija že uvedla zamrznitev premoženja in prepoved izdajanja vizumov 210 osebam zaradi nenehnega zatiranja civilne družbe, politične opozicije in neodvisnih medijev, ki ga izvaja Lukašenkov režim;
D. whereas EU had already introduced an assets freeze and visa ban on 210 people over the continuing repression by Lukashenko’s regime of civil society, the political opposition, and the independent media;
E. ker je Evropska unija že sporočila, da bo marca 2012 potekala razprava o sankcijah proti poslovnežem, ki financirajo Lukašenkov režim;
E. whereas EU has announced a debate to be held in March 2012 on sanctions against businessmen who finance the Lukashenko’s regime;
F. ker so Rusija, Belorusija in Kazahstan v skupni izjavi razglasile gospodarske sankcije proti Minsku za nesprejemljive; ker je Vladimir Putin dejal, da Rusija nasprotuje vsem sankcijam, saj vodijo do posredovanja kot v tragičnih primerih Libije in Iraka;
F. whereas in a joint statement Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan considered economic sanctions against Minsk as unacceptable; whereas Vladimir Putin said that Russia opposed all sanctions because they lead to intervention as in tragic cases of Libya and Iraq;
G. ker se v Belorusiji nenehno dogajajo nadlegovanje in pridržanja zagovornikov človekovih pravic in ker je Lukašenkov režim okrepil zatiranje aktivistov civilne družbe, demokratične opozicije in svobodnih medijev;
G. whereas there are continuous harassments and detentions of human rights defenders in Belarus and Lukashenko’s regime intensified repression against civil society activists, democratic opposition and free media;
H. ker v Belorusiji ni dovolj zaupanja v pravno državo in neodvisnost sodstva, sodni procesi pa očitno ne izpolnjujejo mednarodno priznanih standardov;
H. whereas in Belarus there is insufficient confidence in the rule of law, the independence of the judiciary, and the judicial processes clearly do not meet internationally recognised standards;
I. ker so številni opozicijski politiki, aktivisti civilne družbe in zagovorniki človekovih pravic, na primer Mikolaj Statkevič, Andrej Sanjikav, Pavel Sevjarinec, Dimitrij Bandarenka in Ales Bjaljacki še vedno v zaporu in kazenskih kolonijah;
I. whereas large number of opposition politicians, civil society activists and human rights defenders are still in prison and penal colonies, among them Mikalai Statkevich, Andrei Sannikau, Pavel Seviarynets, Dzmitry Bandarenka and Ales Bialiatski;
J. ker so Sergeja Kavalenko, člana konzervativne krščanske stranke, obsodili na dve leti in mesec zaporne kazni, ker je na božičnem drevesu v Vicjebsku razobesil belo-rdečo-belo zastavo (simbol neodvisne Belorusije); ker Sergej Kavalenka že 86 dni gladovno stavka proti nepravični kazni;
J. whereas Syarhiej Kavalenka, a member of the Conservative Christian Party, has been sentenced for 2 years and 1 month of jail for hanging the white-red-white flag (a symbol of independent Belarus) on the Christmas tree in Vitebsk; whereas Syarhiej Kavalenka continues a hunger strike against an unjust sentence for 86 days now;
K. ker so 14. februarja 2012 Ivana Šilo, beloruskega državljana, ki je študiral na Poljskem, agenti Specnaza aretirali pred centrom PEN v Minsku, kjer naj bi se udeležil slovesnosti ob podelitvi nagrade „Ljubim Belorusijo“; ker je sodišče odločilo, da mora Ivan Šila zaradi lanskoletne solidarnostne kampanje za Dimitrija Daškeviča za 22 dni v zapor;
K. whereas Ivan Shyla, the citizen of Belarusian studying in Poland was arrested on 14 February 2012 by the Spetsnaz officers in front of the PEN Center office in Minsk, where he was to attend the awards ceremony, ‘I love Belarus’; whereas the court decided that Ivan Shyla will spend 22 days in jail for last year’s campaign of solidarity with Dzmitrijem Dashkevich;
L. ker naj bi Belorusija leta 2014 gostila svetovno prvenstvo v hokeju na ledu;
L. whereas Ice Hockey World Championships are expected to be held in Belarus in 2014;
1. odločno obsoja nadaljnje nadlegovanje in pridržanja zagovornikov človekovih pravic pod Lukašenkovim režimom ter poziva beloruske oblasti, naj ustavijo zatiranje aktivistov civilne družbe in neodvisnih novinarjev;
Strongly condemns continuous harassment and detentions of human rights defenders by the Lukashenko regime and urges Belarusian authorities to stop repressions targeted against civil society activists and independent journalists;
3. obsoja aretacijo in obsodbo mladega aktivista Mlade fronte Ivana Šile; opozarja, da dejanja solidarnosti s političnimi zaporniki ne smejo biti izgovor za zatiranje opozicije;
Condemns the arrest and conviction of a young activist of the ‘Young Front’ Ivan Shyla; recalls that the actions of solidarity with political prisoners may not be an excuse to crackdown on opposition;
5. pozdravlja predhodne sankcije EU proti predstavnikom beloruskega režima ter poziva visoko predstavnico EU, Komisijo in Svet, naj preučijo možnost njihove razširitve;
Welcomes previous EU sanctions against representatives of Belarusian regime and calls on the EU High Representative, the Commission and the Council to consider further extension of sanctions;
7. odločno poudarja, da je dialog z beloruskim režimom mogoč samo, če bodo njegove oblasti izpolnile svoje ustavne in mednarodne obveznosti glede pravne države, človekovih pravic in demokracije; ponovno poudarja, da napredek pri dialogu med EU in Belorusijo ni mogoč brez napredka Belorusije na poti do demokracije, človekovih pravic in pravne države;
Strongly stresses that any dialogue with the Belarusian regime is possible only if its authorities will fulfil their constitutional and international obligations on the rule of law, human rights and democracy; reiterates that there cannot be any progress on EU-Belarus dialogue without progress of Belarus towards democracy, human rights and rule of law;
20.3.2012 B7-0187/2012 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
20.3.2012 B7-0187/2012 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and the Commission
o procesu vključevanja Kosova v Evropsko unijo ( 2011/2885(RSP) )
on the European Integration Process of Kosovo ( 2011/2885(RSP) )
PE486.729v01-00 B7‑0187/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o procesu vključevanja Kosova v Evropsko unijo
PE486.729v01-00 B7‑0187/2012 European Parliament resolution on the European Integration Process of Kosovo ( 2011/2885(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. oktobra 2011 z naslovom „Strategija širitve in glavni izzivi za obdobje 2011–2012“ (COM(2011) 666) in priloženega poročila o napredku za Kosovo za leto 2011 (SEC(2011) 1207),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 October 2011 entitled ‘Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012’ (COM(2011)666) and the Commission’s accompanying 2011 Progress Report on Kosovo ( SEC(2011)1207 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov sej Sveta za splošne zadeve z dne 7. decembra 2009, 14. decembra 2010 in 5. decembra 2011, v katerih je poudarjeno in ponovno potrjeno, da bi bilo treba po izpolnitvi vseh pogojev tudi za Kosovo brez poseganja v stališče držav članic do njegovega statusa uvesti liberalizacijo vizumske ureditve, ter ob podpiranju namena Komisije, da do konca leta sproži dialog o vizumih ter da si na podlagi strukturiranega pristopa še naprej prizadeva za približevanje kosovskega prebivalstva EU,
– having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs Council meeting of 7 December 2009, 14 December 2010 and 5 December 2011 stressing and reaffirming that Kosovo, without prejudice to Member States’ position on its status, should also benefit from the perspective of eventual visa liberalisation once all conditions are met, welcoming the intention of the Commission to launch a visa dialogue towards the end of the year and inviting it to move forward with a structured approach to bring the people of Kosovo closer to the EU,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1244/2009 z dne 30. novembra 2009 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 539/2001 o seznamu tretjih držav, katerih državljani morajo pri prehodu zunanjih meja imeti vizume, in držav, katerih državljani so oproščeni te zahteve, in zlasti njene Priloge I, ki zaradi pravne jasnosti in varnosti omenja osebe, ki prebivajo na Kosovu UL L 336, 18.12.2009, str.
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1244/2009 of 30 November 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement , and in particular its Annex I in which a reference to persons residing in Kosovo was made for reasons of legal clarity and security OJ L 336, 18.12.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/124/SZVP z dne 4. februarja 2008 o misiji Evropske unije za utrditev pravne države na Kosovu, EULEX KOSOVO, kakor je bil spremenjen s Skupnim ukrepom Sveta 2009/445/SZVP z dne 9. junija 2009 in Sklepom Sveta 2010/322/SZVP z dne 8. junija 2010,
– having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP of 4 February 2008 on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO, amended by Council Joint Action 2009/445/CFSP of 9 June 2009 and by Council Decision 2010/322/CFSP of 8 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega ukrepa Sveta 2008/123/SZVP z dne 4. februarja 2008 o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije na Kosovu in Sklepa Sveta 2011/478/SZVP z dne 28. julija 2011 o podaljšanju mandata posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije na Kosovu,
– having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/123/CFSP of 4 February 2008 appointing a European Union Special Representative in Kosovo and Council Decision 2011/478/CFSP of 28 July 2011 extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative in Kosovo,
– ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice Evropske unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko/podpredsednice Komisije o razmerah na Kosovu z dne 27. julija 2011,
– having regard to the Statement by European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Commission Vice-President on the situation in Kosovo, 27 July 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Sveta Evropske unije za javnost o dialogu, ki ga spodbuja EU,
– having regard to the Council of the European Union’s press releases on the EU-facilitated dialogue,
– ob upoštevanju skupnih izjav z medparlamentarnih srečanj predstavnikov Evropskega parlamenta in Kosova 28. in 29. maja 2008, 6. in 7. aprila 2009, 22. in 23. junija 2010 ter 20. maja 2011,
– having regard to the joint statements of the EP-Kosovo Inter-Parliamentary meetings of 28-29 May 2008, 6-7 April 2009, 22-23 June 2010, and 20 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila misije strokovnjakov EU za volitve na Kosovu z dne 25. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the final report of European Union Election Expert Mission to Kosovo of 25 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije varnostnega sveta Organizacije združenih narodov št. 1244(1999),
– having regard to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244(1999),
– ob upoštevanju soglasne resolucije generalne skupščine ZN z dne 9. septembra 2010 (A/RES/64/298), ki so jo skupaj vložile Srbija in 27 držav članic EU, o dialogu med Beogradom in Prištino, v kateri je navedeno, da je cilj tega dialoga spodbujanje sodelovanja, doseganje napredka na poti v Evropsko unijo in izboljšanje življenja ljudi ter ki pozdravlja pripravljenost EU, da to omogoči;
– having regard to the consensus resolution of UN General Assembly of 9 September 2010 (A/RES/64/298) tabled jointly by Serbia and the 27 EU Member States on the Belgrade‑Pristine dialogue, stating that its aim would be to ‘promote cooperation, achieve progress on the path to the European Union and improve the lives of the people’ and welcoming the EU’s willingness to facilitate it,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila posebnega odposlanca ZN o prihodnjem statusu Kosova in celovitega predloga za dogovor o statusu Kosova z dne 26. marca 2007 ter zlasti določb tega predloga o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah skupnosti in njihovih članov, verski in kulturni dediščini ter decentralizaciji,
– having regard to the UN Special Envoy’s final report on Kosovo’s future status and the Comprehensive Status Proposal for the Kosovo Status Settlement of 26 March 2007, and in particular its provisions on Human Rights and Fundamental freedoms of Communities and their Members, Religious and Cultural Heritage, and decentralisation,
– ob upoštevanju svetovalnega mnenja Meddržavnega sodišča z dne 22. julija 2011 o skladnosti enostranske razglasitve neodvisnosti Kosova, za katero so se odločile začasne institucije samouprave na Kosovu, z mednarodnim pravom,
– having regard to the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 22 July 2011 on the accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo,
A. ker je Evropski Svet v Solunu 19. in 20. junija 2003 vsem državam zahodnega Balkana obljubil, da se bodo včlanile v Evropsko unijo, in ker je bila ta obljuba ponovljena na srečanju na visoki ravni o zahodnem Balkanu 2. junija 2010 v Sarajevu,
A. whereas at the Thessaloniki European Council of 19 and 20 June 2003 a promise was made to all the Western Balkan States that they would join the European Union, and whereas this promise was reiterated at the High-Level Meeting on the Western Balkans in Sarajevo on 2 June 2010;
B. ker je Evropska unija vedno zagovarjala trajnost večetničnih in večverskih držav na zahodnem Balkanu, ki temeljijo na vrednotah demokracije, strpnosti in večkulturnosti,
B. whereas the European Union has always defended the sustainability of multiethnic and pluri-religious states in the Western Balkans, based on the values of democracy, tolerance and multiculturalism;
C. ker so regionalno sodelovanje in dobri sosedski odnosi bistveni v procesu evropskega povezovanja ter za zagotavljanje varnosti in stabilnosti v regiji;
C. whereas regional cooperation and good neighbourly relations are essential for the process of European integration and for ensuring security and stability in the region;
D. ker je Ahtisaarijev načrt še naprej dober okvir za rešitev spora na severu ter za ohranitev ozemeljske in politične celovitosti Kosova;
D. whereas the Ahtisaari Plan remains a good framework for resolving the conflict over the north and for maintaining the territorial and political integrity of Kosovo;
E. ker nespremenjena šibkost pravne države ovira utrjevanje demokracije in škodi gospodarstvu, s čimer preprečuje dolgoročni razvoj;
E. whereas the persistent weakness of the rule of law delays the maturing of democracy and harms the economy, undermining long-term development;
F. ker so med ključnimi prednostnimi nalogami misije EULEX boj proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu ter preiskovanje in pregon vojnih zločinov;
F. whereas among key priorities of the EULEX mission are the fight against corruption and organised crime and the investigation and prosecution of war crimes;
4. ponovno izraža mnenje iz svojih resolucij z dne 29. marca 2007, 5. februarja 2009 in 8. julija 2010, v katerih zavrača možnost delitve Kosova;
Reiterates its view, as expressed in its resolutions of 29 March 2007, 5 February 2009 and 8 July 2010, that the possibility of partitioning Kosovo should be rejected;
6. poziva vse strani, vlado in opozicijo, da hitro nadaljujejo z obljubljenimi ustavnimi in volilnimi reformami, kot so volivcem prisegli po volitvah, da bo volilni sistem postal bolj pregleden ter da bo usklajen z mednarodnimi standardi, zlasti s standardi Sveta Evrope;
Calls on all parties, whether in government or in opposition, swiftly to proceed with the promised constitutional and electoral reforms, as pledged to the electorate after the elections, in order to make the electoral system more transparent and to bring it in line with international standards, in particular th o se of the Council of Europe;
9. poudarja, da ostaja vračanje beguncev in notranje razseljenih oseb izziv za Kosovo; pozdravlja prizadevanja kosovskih oblasti na tem področju in spodbuja nadaljnja prizadevanja na centralni in lokalni ravni, da se zagotovi družbeno-gospodarsko vključevanje povratnikov ob posebnem upoštevanju potreb romskih, aškalskih in egipčanskih povratnikov;
Stresses that the return of refugees and internally displaced persons remains a challenge for Kosovo ; welcomes the efforts of the Kosovar authorities in this field , and encourages further efforts on central and local level to ensure the socio-economic integration of the returnees, taking into special consideration the needs of the Serbian, Roma, Ashkali and Egyptian returnees;