natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje zamude pri doseganju preglednosti sredstev EU, ki jih upravljajo mednarodne organizacije, zlasti pa OZN (pri „skupnem upravljanju“); obžaluje težave, ki jih ima Računsko sodišče s pridobivanjem revizijskih poročil in podpornih dokumentov od OZN, kljub večkratnim pozivom Komisije k spoštovanju Okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma (FAFA); priznava in pozdravlja dosežen napredek, zlasti sklenitev sporazuma o revizijskih pooblastilih med službenimi obiski, namenjenimi preverjanju, aprila 2009 in podpis skupnih smernic o poročanju;
Deplores the delays in achieving transparency over EU funds administered by international organisations and especially by the UN (in ‘joint management’); deplores the difficulties the Court has had to face, despite the Commission's repeated calls for observance of the Financial and Administrative Framework Agreement (FAFA), in obtaining audit reports and supporting documents from the UN; recognises and welcomes the progress made, in particular the conclusion of an agreement on terms of reference for verification missions in April 2009 and the signature of the joint guidelines on reporting;
pozitivno ocenjuje dejstvo, da imajo organizacije ZN pogosto posebne izkušnje in strokovno znanje, ki jih drugje ni mogoče zlahka najti; vseeno izraža zaskrbljenost, ker Komisija ni prepričljiva pri predhodnem predstavljanju dokazov o tem, da je izbira organizacij ZN dejansko učinkovitejši in uspešnejši način za zagotavljanje pomoči Glej posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 15/2009 „Pomoč Evropske unije, ki se izvaja prek organizacij Združenih narodov: odločanje in spremljanje“.
Appreciates that UN organisations often possess specific experience and expertise not readily found elsewhere; none the less, expresses concern that the Commission does not convincingly demonstrate beforehand whether the choice of a UN organisation is in fact more efficient and effective than other ways of delivering aid See Special Report No 15/2009 of the Court of Auditors on ‘EU assistance implemented through United Nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring’.
od drugih načinov; poziva Komisijo k izvajanju preglednejših in bolj nepristranskih postopkov pri izbiri kanalov za izvajanje pomoči;
; calls on the Commission to implement a more transparent and objective process for selecting aid implementation channels;
ugotavlja, da se glede na trenutne trende prispevki v sklade več donatorjev, zlasti prispevki ZN, povečujejo, v skladu z načelom dobrega donatorskega sodelovanja; vseeno izraža nezadovoljstvo z nenehnimi težavami, s katerimi se Računsko sodišče sooča pri dostopu do finančne dokumentacije agencij ZN; pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da bi Računskemu sodišču olajšala postopek revizije, in poziva k nadaljnjim ukrepom, s katerimi bi povsem zaščitili finančne interese Evropske unije in povečali preglednost postopkov, med drugim k spremembam okvirnega finančnega in upravnega sporazuma (FAFA), če bodo potrebne;
Notes the ongoing trend of increasing contributions to the multi-donor funds and in particular to the UN, in line with the principles of good donor cooperation; however, expresses its dissatisfaction concerning the persisting problems faced by the Court of Auditors in accessing the financial documents emanating from the UN agencies; welcomes the steps taken by the Commission to facilitate the auditing processes of the Court of Auditors and calls for further measures in order to fully safeguard the financial interests of the European Union and to increase the transparency of the process including, if necessary, modifications to the FAFA;
v povezavi s tem izraža globoko obžalovanje in nezadovoljstvo, ker Komisija še ni oblikovala resničnega evropskega instrumenta za obvladovanje izrednih razmer, kot je bilo zahtevano v prejšnjih resolucijah o razrešnicah; ponovno zahteva, da se to nujno izvede, in poziva novo Komisijo, da si ustvari možnost, da bi sama upravljala večdonatorske sklade v prihodnji reviziji Finančne uredbe;
Stresses in this context its deep frustration and dissatisfaction that the Commission has so far failed to act in order to create a truly European instrument for the implementation of crisis management, as it has been asked to do in previous discharge resolutions; once more insists that this should be done urgently, and calls on the new Commission to give itself the possibility of managing multi-donor trust funds itself in the forthcoming revision of the Financial Regulation;
pozdravlja pozitivne premike v zvezi s preglednostjo, cilji in usklajevanjem med mednarodnimi donatorji, ki jih je prinesla vzpostavitev mehanizma PEGASE Palestinsko-evropski mehanizem za upravljanje in socialno-ekonomsko pomoč.
Welcomes the positive developments in terms of transparency, goals and international donor coordination brought about by the establishment of the PEGASE mechanism Mécanisme ‘Palestino Européen de Gestion et d'Aide Socio-Economique’.
; ta temelji na začasnem mednarodnem mehanizmu Začasni mednarodni mehanizem.
, which was built upon the TIM Temporary International Mechanism.
, vendar je njegov obseg širši, saj v skladu s palestinskim načrtom za reforme in razvoj zajema tako odhodke začasnega mehanizma kot stroške ponovnega zagona gospodarskih dejavnosti – proračunsko podporo, financiranje infrastrukture in socialnih zadev;
but which is wider in scope as it covers both TIM expenditure and expenses relating to the re-launching of economic activities – budgetary support, the financing of infrastructures and social issues – in line with the Palestinian Reform and Development Plan;
je seznanjen s priporočili Računskega sodišča, da je treba v strateških programskih dokumentih za evropski sosedski in partnerski instrument opredeliti jasne strateške cilje in merljive kazalnike uspešnosti; meni, da bi bilo treba nekaj podobnega storiti tudi pri drugih zunanjih instrumentih, katerih področje je še vedno precej splošno;
Notes the Court's recommendation that clear strategic objectives and measurable performance indicators should be established in the strategy programming documents for the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument; considers that similar steps should also be taken in relation to other external instruments, which continue to be very general in scope;
predlaga, da Komisija pripravi študijo, v kateri bi preverila možnosti za povečanje prilagodljivosti proračunov na področju zunanjih politik; meni, da naj bi glede na dosedanje prekoračitve proračuna in še naprej rastoče potrebe na tem političnem področju že od vsega začetka obstajale možnosti za povečanje prilagodljivosti, čeprav ne na račun dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in proračunskega nadzora;
Suggests that the Commission draw up a study assessing the scope for making external policy budgets more flexible; considers that, in view of the budget surpluses which have arisen to date and the still growing needs in this field of policy, scope for greater flexibility should be provided for in advance, although not at the expense of proper budgeting and budgetary control;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče z revizijo prevzetih obveznosti za proračunsko podporo ugotovilo, da nanje vpliva visoka stopnja količinsko neopredeljivih napak; vztraja, da Komisija še strožje ocenjuje ta plačila; v zvezi s tem z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je bil februarja 2009 opravljen pregled finančnih tokov za ta plačila;
Deplores the finding by the Court's audit that budget support commitments were affected by a high level of non-quantifiable errors; insists that the Commission should assess these payments even more rigorously; notes with satisfaction in this context the review in February 2009 of the financial circuits for this type of payments;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je povečala jasnost in izboljšala struktura ocen Komisije o skladnosti z določili Sporazuma o IRS (finančni instrument za razvojno sodelovanje); vendar kljub temu obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče odkrilo pogoste primere, v katerih Komisija ni na strukturiran in formaliziran način prikazala, da je bilo upravljanje javnih financ dovolj pregledno, odgovorno in uspešno, ali da vsaj obstaja verodostojen in ustrezen program za spremembe;
Notes with satisfaction the improvement in the clarity and structure of the Commission's assessments of compliance with the requirements of the DCI Agreement (Financing instrument for development cooperation); however, deplores the fact that the Court has found frequent cases in which the Commission did not demonstrate in a structured and formalised manner that public finance management was sufficiently transparent, accountable and effective, or, at least, that a credible and relevant reform programme was in place;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da bi morala Komisija nadaljevati s prizadevanji za podporo svojih odločitev glede upravičenosti do pomoči iz proračunskih sredstev in zagotoviti, da bodo vsi prihodnji sporazumi o financiranju pomenili celovito in jasno podlago za oceno skladnosti s pogoji plačila;
Agrees with the Court that the Commission should pursue its efforts to support its decisions on the eligibility of budget support and to ensure that all future financing agreements provide a comprehensive and clear basis for the assessment of compliance with payment conditions;
glede proračunske podpore poziva Komisijo, naj podpre nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme za zagotavljanje zakonitosti plačil, naj tesneje spremlja organizacije, ki izvajajo projekte, financirane s sredstvi EU, naj izvaja učinkovitejše revizije s strogimi spremljevalnimi ukrepi in naj razvije smernice za proračunsko podporo, ki bodo bolj naravnane k rezultatom;
Calls on the Commission, as regards budget support, to bolster supervisory and control systems for ensuring the regularity of payments, to monitor more closely organisations implementing EU-funded projects, to carry out more effective audits, with rigorous follow-up, and to develop more results-oriented budget support guidelines;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga partnerskim državam pri razvoju parlamentarnega nadzora in zmogljivosti revizije, zlasti ko se pomoč zagotavlja s proračunsko podporo, in poziva Komisijo, naj redno poroča o doseženem napredku;
Urges the Commission to help partner countries develop parliamentary control and audit capacities, in particular when aid is provided via budget support, and invites the Commission to report regularly on progress achieved;
poudarja, da je njegova vloga pri pomoči iz proračunskih sredstev zagotoviti, da Komisija prevzame odgovornost za rezultate porabe in da je proračunska podpora instrument pomoči, ki zahteva drugačen način nadzora, in sicer prehod s kontrole nad vloženimi viri na nadzor rezultatov v primerjavi s kazalniki;
Points out that its role as regards budget support is to hold the Commission accountable for the results of spending, and that budget support is an aid instrument which requires a paradigm shift in oversight behaviour, moving from control over inputs to the checking of results against indicators;
ponovno izraža svojo zahtevo, da bi morali biti razvojna pomoč in zlasti proračunska podpora na splošno vedno bolj vezani na predhodno nacionalno izjavo o razkritju, ki jo izda vlada države prejemnice in podpiše finančni minister, o izbranih vprašanjih, ki vplivajo na strukturo upravljanja in odgovornosti države prejemnice;
Reiterates its request that development aid in general and budget support in particular should be progressively linked to an ex-ante country disclosure statement, issued by the recipient country's government and signed by its finance minister, concerning selected issues that affect the governance and accountability structure of a beneficiary country;
poziva novo Komisijo, naj prevzame vodilno vlogo in predloži ta predlog drugim mednarodnim donatorjem – zlasti Svetovni banki – da bi razvili in izvajali tak instrument v dogovoru z drugimi donatorji; čaka na sporočilo Komisije o možnem časovnem okviru za ta pogajanja;
Invites the new Commission to take the lead and to present this proposal to other international donors – in particular the World Bank – with a view to developing and implementing such an instrument in agreement with other donors; waits to be informed by the Commission about a possible timeframe for such negotiations;
poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli strateške cilje in ustrezne kazalnike uspešnosti, ki bodo omogočali učinkovito oceno vpliva ukrepov EU;
Urges the Commission to define strategic objectives and adequate performance indicators that would allow an efficient impact assessment of EU actions;
poziva Komisijo, naj na splošno nameni večjo pozornost zdravju žensk v državah v razvoju, zlasti izboljšanju zdravja mater, saj prav na tem področju doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja poteka najpočasneje;
Invites the Commission to place greater emphasis on women's health in developing countries in general, and improvements in maternal health in particular, as this is the area in which the MDG targets are furthest from being met;
pozdravlja napredek pri razdelitvi dela med donatorji in drugih načelih o učinkovitosti pomoči; vseeno meni, da bi morala Komisija povečati prizadevanje za usklajevanje dejavnosti držav članic na tem področju;
Welcomes progress as regards division of labour between donors, as well as other aid effectiveness principles; feels, however, that the Commission should step up its efforts to coordinate Member States‘ activities in this respect;
poudarja potrebo po večji učinkovitosti in manjši razdrobljenosti pomoči; meni, da je treba zmanjšati veliko število projektov, ki jih upravljajo Komisija in države članice (približno 40.000 projektov) na ta način, da se da prednost učinkovitejšim programom in boljši usklajenosti z donatorji EU, z jasno usmerjenostjo k bolj omejenemu številu prednostnih področij ukrepov pomoči za vsako državo upravičenko, pri čemer se ne sme izključiti majhnih, vendar učinkovitih nevladnih organizacij, ki so dejavne na tem področju;
Stresses the need to increase aid effectiveness and to reduce aid fragmentation; considers that the great number of projects managed by the Commission and Member States (some 40 000 projects) should be reduced by giving the priority to more effective programmes and better coordination with EU donors through a clear focus on a more limited number of priority intervention areas for each beneficiary country, whilst not excluding small but effective NGOs working in the field;
ugotavlja, da je izvrševanje 63 % sredstev, ki so bila do zdaj namenjena uporabi v okviru instrumenta za hrano, potekalo prek mednarodnih organizacij, in opominja, da Uredba (ES) št. 1337/2008 Uredba (ES) št. 1337/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2008 o ustanovitvi instrumenta za hitro odzivanje na hitro naraščajoče cene hrane v državah v razvoju (UL L 354, 31.12.2008, str.
Notes that 63 % of funds committed so far under the ‘Food Facility’ have been channelled through international organisations, and recalls that Regulation(EC) No 1337/2008 Regulation (EC) No 1337/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 December 2008 establishing a facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries (OJ L 354, 31.12.2008, p.
določa, da mora Komisija v zvezi z izvrševanjem pomoči ohraniti „ustrezno ravnotežje“ S projekti skupnega upravljanja z mednarodnimi organizacijami so bila izvršena sredstva v višini 530 milijonov EUR od 837 milijonov EUR.
stipulates that, as regards implementation, the Commission is obliged to maintain an ‘appropriate balance’ EUR 530 million out of EUR 837 million concerned joint management projects with international organisations.
med mednarodnimi organizacijami in „drugimi upravičenimi subjekti“;
between international organisations and ‘other eligible entities’;
znova poziva k večji vključenosti parlamentov in k posvetovanju s civilno družbo Posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča št. 4/2009 „Komisijino upravljanje vključenosti nedržavnih akterjev v razvojno sodelovanje ES“.
Calls once again for greater involvement of parliaments and consultation of civil society Special Report No 4/2009 of the Court of Auditors on ‘The Commission's management of non-state actors’ involvement in EC development cooperation‘.
Uredba (ES) št. 1905/2006 (DCI) v členih 19(8) in 20(2) od Komisije zahteva, da se „v zgodnji fazi“ postopka načrtovanja programov posvetuje s predstavniki civilne družbe.
Article 19(8) and Article 20(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 (DCI) require the Commission to consult representatives of civil society ’at an early stage‘ of the programming process.
v partnerskih državah pri pripravi in pregledu državnih strateških dokumentov v okviru instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje;
in partner countries when drawing up and reviewing DCI Country Strategy Papers;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za večjo prepoznavnost dejavnosti, ki jih financira EU, v tujini;
Urges the Commission to ensure better visibility for EU-funded activities overseas;
je seznanjen s pisnimi pripombami komisarjev Maroša Šefčoviča in Algirdasa Šemete z dne 8. marca 2010, v katerih so podrobne informacije o tem, kako Komisija in izvajalske agencije financirajo nevladne organizacije;
Notes the written comments from Commissioners Maroš Šefčovič and Algirdas Šemeta dated 8 March 2010 including detailed information about financing of NGO-type organisations by the Commission and the Executive Agencies;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje javni register nevladnih organov, ki jih financirajo službe Komisije, da bi uskladila različne podatkovne zbirke o upravičencih, ki iz proračuna EU ali Evropskega razvojnega sklada prejemajo sredstva, v računovodskem sistemu nakazala neprofitno naravo upravičencev in raziskala možnost, da bi register zastopnikov interesov razširila z informacijami o sredstvih, ki so jih ti prejeli od EU;
Invites the Commission to establish a public register of NGO-type bodies funded by Commission services, to harmonise its various databases on beneficiaries receiving funds from the EU budget or the European Development Fund, to indicate in its accounting system the ‘not-for-profit’ nature of the beneficiary entities and to look into the possibility of expanding the register of interest representatives by including information about their funding received from the EU;
je zaskrbljen, ker nacionalni organi v Bolgariji in Romuniji pomanjkljivo upravljajo predpristopna sredstva, in pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih izvaja Komisija, med drugim prekinitev plačil, podrobno spremljanje in sodelovanje z obema državama članicama, kar je pripomoglo k bistvenemu izboljšanju razmer; vendar je kljub temu še naprej zaskrbljen zaradi poglavitnih slabosti, povezanih z morebitnimi nepravilnostmi pri upravljanju sredstev iz programa Phare dveh izvajalskih agencij v Bolgariji, čeprav je sklepanje pogodb za sredstva Phare že končano; je seznanjen s prizadevanji sedanjih oblasti, ki raziskujejo nepravilnosti in izvajajo reformo o upravljanju sredstev EU;
Is concerned by the weaknesses in the management of pre-accession funds by national authorities in Bulgaria and Romania and welcomes the measures implemented by the Commission, including the interruption of payments, close monitoring and cooperation with the two Member States, all of which have led to a significant improvement in the situation; however, remains concerned about the fundamental weaknesses concerning potential irregularities in the management of Phare funds by two implementing agencies in Bulgaria, even though the contracting for Phare funds has been terminated; notes the commitment on the part of the current authorities to investigate the irregularities and to reform the management of EU funding;
je seznanjen s tem, da naj bi se razgradnja na jedrski elektrarni Kozloduj (jedrski bloki 1 do 4) zaključila do 19. oktobra 2035; ugotavlja nepreglednost pri izvoru sredstev iz različnih generalnih direkcij Komisije; prosi Računsko sodišče za izvedbo pregleda tam uporabljenih sredstev;
Notes that decommissioning work at the Kozloduy nuclear power station (Kozloduy blocks 1 to 4) is to be completed by 19 October 2035; notes a lack of transparency in the origin of the funds from various Directorates-General at the Commission; requests the Court of Auditors to scrutinise the funds used there;
obžaluje, da ni prišlo do bistvenega napredka pri odpravi ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti (zlasti glede nacionalnega sklada za obnovo cest); glede na to podpira previden pristop Komisije in njeno zavezo, da bo skrbno spremljala razmere in nadaljnje ugotovitve ter bolgarskim oblastem zagotavljala nasvete in pomoč, kako odpraviti ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti; poziva Komisijo, naj bo nadvse pozorna in stroga pri odobritvi poročil o oceni skladnosti operativnih programov, ki jih predložijo bolgarske oblasti, in pred začetkom izplačevanja vmesnih izplačil za programsko obdobje 2007–2013; je seznanjen z ukrepi, ki jih je sprejela Bolgarija; pozdravlja pozitiven izid postopkov Komisije glede ocene skladnosti za vse operativne programe, medtem pa poudarja, da je treba tudi v prihodnje nadaljevati z učinkovito kontrolo in smernicami Komisije;
Deplores the absence of substantial progress in addressing the weaknesses identified (in particular in relation to the National Road Infrastructure Fund); consequently,supports the Commission's prudent approach and its undertaking to closely monitor the situation, to follow up on the findings and to provide advice and assistance to the Bulgarian authorities with a view to addressing the weaknesses identified; urges the Commission to apply the utmost vigilance and rigour when approving the compliance assessment reports submitted for the operational programmes proposed by the Bulgarian authorities and before starting to disburse the intermediate payments in respect of the 2007-2013 programming period; notes the steps taken by Bulgaria; welcomes the positive outcome of the Commission's compliance assessment procedures for all operational programmes, whilst stressing that effective control and guidance from the Commission should be further applied;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija julija 2008 začasno ustavila plačila Romuniji po programu SAPARD zaradi pomanjkljivosti in nepravilnosti, ki so jih našle njene službe, ter pozdravlja akcijski načrt, ki ga je predložila Romunija za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti, zaradi česar je Komisija julija 2009 lahko umaknila začasno ustavitev plačil;
Notes the suspension by the Commission of payments in Romania under the SAPARD programme in July 2008 due to weaknesses and irregularities identified by its services, and welcomes the action plan presented by Romania addressing these deficiencies, which allowed the Commission to withdraw the suspension of payments in July 2009;
podpira Komisijo, ker je leta 2008 začasno prekinila plačila Bolgariji v okviru treh predpristopnih programov, Phare/Prehodni viri, ISPA in SAPARD, da bi zaščitila finančne interese EU zaradi pomanjkljivosti in nepravilnosti, ki so jih našle njene službe pri upravljanju teh sredstev; pozdravlja pozitiven odgovor Bolgarije na vsa priporočila, kar je Komisiji omogočilo, da je leta 2009 umaknila začasno ustavitev plačil;
Supports the suspension by the Commission of payments in Bulgaria under the three pre-accession programmes, Phare/Transition Facility, ISPA and SAPARD, made in 2008 in order to protect the financial interests of the EU in view of weaknesses and irregularities identified by its services in the management of these funds; welcomes the positive reaction from Bulgaria to all recommendations, which allowed the Commission to withdraw its payment suspensions in 2009;
kljub temu obžaluje pomanjkljivosti, zlasti povezane s tem, da nepravilne vloge za podporo niso bile odkrite in zaradi tega niti spremljane, in poziva Bolgarijo, naj sprejme podroben akcijski načrt v tesnem sodelovanju s Komisijo in pod strogim nadzorom neodvisnega revizorja;
Nevertheless, regrets the weaknesses, in particular the failure to identify irregular support applications and adequately to follow up the irregularities, and urges Bulgaria to adopt a detailed action plan in close cooperation with the Commission and under close supervision by an independent auditor;