natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju, da se monetarne spodbude, zagotovljene v zadnjih letih, postopoma umikajo, poziva Komisijo k doslednemu tolmačenju obnovljenega pakta stabilnosti in rasti ter poziva države članice, naj skušajo na letni ravni zmanjšati svoj ciklično prilagojeni proračunski primanjkljaj za priporočenega 0,5 % BDP, kar bi ublažilo inflacijske pritiske in ohranilo nizke obrestne mere na ravni, ki ne ogroža sedanjega gospodarskega okrevanja; s tem v zvezi opozarja na dodano vrednost boljšega davčnega, zlasti proračunskega, usklajevanja med državami članicami, da bi v primerjavi z dobro razvito monetarno politiko EMU dosegli skladnejše ravnotežje makroekonomske politike;
Taking into account that the monetary stimulus given in recent years is gradually being withdrawn; calls on the Commission to adhere to a strict interpretation of the renewed Stability and Growth Pact and on Member States to pursue an annual improvement in their cyclically adjusted budget deficits of 0,5% of GDP as a benchmark, which will help to dampen inflationary pressures and keep interest rates down at levels that do not endanger the current economic recovery; recalls in this context the added value of better fiscal, especially budgetary, coordination among Member States towards a more coherent macro-economic policy balance, as compared to the well-developed monetary policy of the EMU;
meni, da je pomembno, da vse države članice, vsaj države članice euro območja – brez poseganja v načelo subsidiarnosti pri davčni politiki in ob spoštovanju posebnih pravic nacionalnih vlad pri oblikovanju svoje strukturne in proračunske politike, pri svojih nacionalnih proračunskih napovedih in načrtovanih proračunskih ukrepih uporabljajo podobna merila in statistike, da bi se izognili razlikam, ki izhajajo iz uporabe različnih makroekonomskih kazalnikov (gospodarska rast v svetu, rast v EU, cena za sodček nafte, obrestne mere) in drugih parametrov; meni, da ima Komisija lahko pri tem pomembno vlogo;
Considers that, without questioning the principle of subsidiarity in fiscal policy and respecting the prerogatives of national governments in determining their structural and budgetary policies, it is important that all Member States, at least those belonging to the euro area, coordinate their different national fiscal calendars and base their budgetary projections on similar criteria in order to avoid disparities caused by the use of different macro-economic forecasts (global growth, EU growth, price per barrel of oil, interest rates) and other parameters; believes that the Commission can provide an important contribution to achieve this mission;
poziva države članice, naj precejšen delež dodatnih davčnih prihodkov, ki so posledica trenutne gospodarske rasti, namenijo zmanjšanju javnega dolga, s čimer se bodo sprostila sredstva za izobraževanje, poklicno usposabljanje, infrastrukturo, raziskave in inovacije v skladu s cilji Lizbonske in Göteborške strategije ter za reševanje težav v zvezi s staranjem prebivalstva in podnebnimi spremembami;
Calls on Member States to allocate a substantial share of additional fiscal revenues obtained from the current economic growth to reduce public debt which will free resources to be invested in education, vocational training, infrastructure, and research and innovation in line with the objectives set by the Lisbon-Göteborg Strategy and to face the challenges presented by an ageing population and climate change;
opozarja Komisijo, da je Parlament v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 4. aprila 2006 zahteval izvedbo splošnega pregleda davčnih sistemov držav članic, ki je ključna metoda za krepitev konkurenčnosti gospodarstva in trajnosti javnih financ;
Reminds the Commission that in its above-mentioned resolution of 4 April 2006, the Parliament asked for a general review of the Member States' fiscal systems, which is a key method to strengthen the competitiveness of the economy and the sustainability of public finances;
poziva Komisijo, da pripravi raziskavo o koristih, za euro območje in Unijo kot celoto, boljšega delovanja gospodarskega stebra EMU, veljavno za euro območje z vidika rasti in zaposlovanja;
Invites the Commission to prepare a study on the benefits for the euro area and for the Union as a whole of a better functioning of the economic pillar of the EMU applied to the euro area in terms of growth and employment;
Gospodarske reforme
Economic reforms
s tem v zvezi ponovno opozarja na pomen aktivnega in takojšnjega izvajanja Lizbonske strategije in sicer v enaki meri na vseh ravneh in na vseh področjih politike, ki potrebujejo uskladitev in integracijo celotne vrste reform na področju gospodarske, zaposlovalne, okoljske in socialne politike;
Recalls in this context the importance of the active and urgent implementation of the Lisbon Strategy equally at all levels and in all policy fields concerned by a multi-supportive policy mix of economic, employment, environment and social policy reforms;
ugotavlja, da se gospodarstvo euro območja zelo počasi prilagaja ponovni rasti svetovnega gospodarstva, zlasti zaradi šibkega domačega povpraševanja, in da bodo gospodarske reforme na trgu proizvodov, dela in kapitala omogočile hitrejše prilagajanje cen in plač spreminjajočim se gospodarskim okoliščinam, kar je bistveno za povečevanje potenciala rasti, odpravljanje neosnovanih razlik v rasti in inflaciji med državami članicami euro območja in prilagajanje morebitnim neugodnim razmeram v mednarodnem okolju;
Realises that the euro area economy adjusted to world growth recovery only very sluggishly, mainly due to the weakness in domestic demand and that economic reforms in product, labour and capital markets will help prices and wages to respond more rapidly to changing economic circumstances, this being essential for raising the potential for growth, dealing with unwarranted disparities in growth and inflation among Member States in the euro area, and adjusting to potentially adverse global developments;
upošteva dejstvo, da so nekatere države članice sprejele obveznosti v okviru svojih nacionalnih programov reform (NPR), vendar ugotavlja, da to ni dovolj ter poziva države članice, da ukrepajo; opozarja, da bi sprejetje kodeksa ravnanja pospešilo gospodarsko uspešnost; omogočilo bi vzajemno spremljanje NPR s strani držav članic prek izmenjav najboljše prakse in z objavo letne "razpredelnice uspešnosti" s strani Komisije, ki prikazuje države z najboljšimi in najslabšimi rezultati, kot predlaga poročilo iz novembra leta 2004 z naslovom "Sprejeti izziv - Lizbonska strategija za rast in zaposlovanje", ki ga je pripravila skupina Komisije na visoki ravni pod predsedstvom Wima Koka;
Takes into account that some Member States have shown commitment in their national reform programmes (NRPs), but realises that this is not sufficient and urges the Member States to undertake action; recalls that economic performance would be furthered by the approval of a code of conduct allowing for mutual monitoring by Member States of NRPs, through the exchange of best practices and the publication by the Commission of an annual "league table" showing the best and worst-performing countries, as proposed in the report of November 2004 by the Commission's High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok entitled 'Facing the Challenge - The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment';
meni, da bi morale države članice euro območja nadaljevati istočasni napredek glede treh načel Lizbonsko-göteborškega modela (gospodarska rast, socialna kohezija in varstvo okolja) ter poudarja tudi potencial "prožne varnosti" (prožnost in varnost) za povečanje udeležbe na trgu dela, zlasti žensk, starejših delavcev, mladih, kronično nezaposlenih in priseljencev;
Considers that the euro-area Member States should continue to progress simultaneously as regards the three principles of the Lisbon-Göteborg model (economic growth, social cohesion and environmental protection) and also emphasises the potential of 'flexicurity' (flexibility and security) for increasing labour market participation, in particular that of women, older workers, young people, the long-term unemployed, and immigrants;
ponovno izraža svoje prepričanje, da je mogoče skupno konsolidirano davčno osnovo za pravne osebe uvesti tudi z mehanizmom okrepljenega sodelovanja, če države članice ne bi bile sposobne soglasno sprejeti dogovora; poudarja, da bi mehanizem okrepljenega sodelovanja, čeprav manj zaželen kot soglasen sporazum držav članic, omogočil veliki večini držav članic napredovanje na področju skupnega okvira za obdavčitev podjetij na notranjem trgu, medtem ko bo državam članicam, ki pri tem niso udeležene, omogočeno, da se pridružijo kasneje; je prepričan, da je to vprašanje vedno večjega pomena za euro območje in poziva države članice euro območja, da povečajo svoja prizadevanja za dosego napredka na tem področju;
Recalls its conviction that the objective of introducing a common consolidated corporate tax base in Europe could also be achieved through the mechanism of enhanced cooperation if Member States were unable to reach unanimous agreement; underlines that the mechanism of enhanced cooperation - though less desirable than a unanimous agreement of the Member States - would allow the great majority of Member States to progress in the field of a common framework for company taxation in the internal market while allowing the non-participating Member States the possibility to join at a later stage; believes that this issue is ever more relevant for the euro area and urges the Member States of the euro area to step up their efforts in order to make progress in this field;
meni, da je dokončna vzpostavitev notranjega trga, zlasti na področju storitev, ključna za pospeševanje gospodarske rasti in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v EMU; zato poziva k nadaljnjemu in izboljšanemu izvajanju direktiv; obsoja ukrepe, ki so jih sprejele nekatere države članice za zaščito svojih ključnih industrijskih panog in storitev pred čezmejno konkurenco ter ponovno poudarja svojo zavezanost načelom prostega pretoka oseb, blaga, storitev in kapitala;
Considers that the completion of the internal market, especially in services, is crucial to fostering economic growth and job creation within the EMU; therefore calls for further and better implementation of directives; condemns the policies adopted by some Member States to protect their key industries and services from cross-border competition and renews its commitment to the principles of free movement of persons, goods, services and capital;
soglaša s Komisijo glede potrebe po odstranitvi ovir za vzpostavitev enotnega evropskega plačilnega območja in sprejetju nadaljnjih ukrepov za odpiranje razdrobljenih trgov finančnih storitev na drobno (varčevalne sheme, hipoteke, zavarovanja in pokojnine) ter hkrati po zagotovitvi varstva potrošnikov; poudarja pomen razvijanja skupnega evropskega pristopa k urejanju finančnega trga in njegovemu nadzoru ter opozarja, da je potrebno pregledati pravila v zvezi s plačilno sposobnostjo zavarovalnic (Solventnost II) in diskrecijskimi pravicami regulatorjev v primeru čezmejnih združitev, da se preprečijo spori med nadzornimi organi v matičnih državah članicah in državah članicah gostiteljicah;
Agrees with the Commission on the necessity of removing barriers for the creation of a Single European Payment Area and of taking further action to open up the fragmented retail financial services markets (savings plans, mortgages, insurance and pensions) while ensuring the protection of consumers; underlines the importance of developing a pan-European approach to financial market regulation and supervision and recalls that it is necessary to review the rules on insurance solvency (Solvency II) as well of those concerning the discretionary powers of regulators in the case of cross-border mergers to avoid conflicts between the supervisors in the home and host Member States;
meni, da je ambiciozna politika EU na področju inovacij eden temeljev trajnostnega razvoja in ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest ter bi jo bilo treba kot najpomembnejšo prednostno nalogo vključiti v okvir izboljšanega gospodarskega usklajevanja; obžaluje, da izdatki za raziskave in razvoj v euro območju obsegajo okoli 2 % BDP in torej občutno manj od cilja 3 %, določenega za EU kot celoto; poziva Komisijo, da vloži konkretne predloge v zvezi s financiranjem raziskovanja in razvoja v EU in učinkovitim okvirom za zaščito pravic intelektualne lastnine; poziva države članice, naj dodelijo več sredstev za raziskave in inovacije in uvedejo davčne spodbude za podjetja in univerze, ki vlagajo v raziskave in razvoj, saj so tovrstne spodbude v primerjavi z neposrednimi subvencijami boljše jamstvo, da bodo javna sredstva porabljena za podporo uspešnih projektov;
Believes that an ambitious EU innovation policy is one of the main cornerstones of sustainable development and job creation and should be included as a top priority in the framework of an improved economic coordination approach; regrets that research and development expenditures in the euro area stand at around 2% of GDP, and thus fall significantly short of the EU-wide objective of 3%; calls on the Commission to table concrete proposals regarding the financing of R&D within the EU and an efficient framework of intellectual property rights; calls on Member States to allocate more resources to research and innovation and to establish tax incentives for businesses and universities investing in R&D, knowing that, compared with direct subsidies, such incentives are a better guarantee that public resources will be used to support successful ventures;
meni, da bi trg delovne sile moral postati prožnejši, odpraviti pa bi morali tudi tiste zakonodajne vidike v zvezi s zaposlovanjem za nedoločen čas, ki ovirajo prilagajanje trga dela; priznava, da bi morale dolgoročno dejanske plače in produktivnost sočasno rasti; obžaluje, da številni predlogi Parlamenta niso bili upoštevani, zlasti tisti v zvezi z izboljšanjem zmogljivosti za varstvo otrok, doseganjem boljšega ravnotežja med delom in življenjem, uvajanjem spodbud za delavce, ki se odločijo za poznejšo prostovoljno upokojitev, oblikovanjem politik za vključevanje zakonitih priseljencev na trg dela in boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju;
Considers that labour markets should be made more flexible and those aspects of the legislation on permanent employment that may act as a barrier to labour market adjustment should be removed; admits that in the long term, real wages and productivity should grow simultaneously; regrets that many of the proposals made by the Parliament have not been taken into account, especially those referring to the improvement of child-care facilities, the achievement of a better work-life balance, the setting up of incentives to encourage workers to delay voluntary retirement, and the establishment of policies aimed at integrating legal immigrants into the labour market and combating illegal immigration;
obžaluje, da je sedanja raven izobraževanja in vseživljenjskega učenja, ki bi ju bilo treba vključiti kot prvenstveni prednostni nalogi v okvir izboljšanega gospodarskega usklajevanja, nedvomno nezadostna in soglaša z večino predlaganih ukrepov Komisije; vendar obžaluje, da nekateri predlogi Parlamenta niso bili upoštevani, zlasti tisti, katerih cilj je izboljšati znanje tujih jezikov, matematike in naravoslovnih predmetov v osnovni in srednji šoli, doseči integriran model poklicnega usposabljanja, spodbuditi študente k izbiri poklicne poti na znanstvenem področju, okrepiti sodelovanje med univerzami ter industrijskim in poslovnim sektorjem, spodbujati ponudbo izobraževanja, ki upošteva povpraševanje na trgu dela, vsem zagotoviti dostop do terciarnega izobraževanja, spodbujati vseživljenjsko učenje, ustrezno reševati dolgoročno brezposelnost in brezposelnost mladih ter zagotoviti boljše sporočanje, širjenje in uporabo rezultatov raziskav;
Regrets that the current levels of education and lifelong learning, which should be included as top priorities in the framework of an improved economic coordination approach, are clearly insufficient and agrees with most of the measures proposed by the Commission; regrets, however, that some of the proposals approved by the Parliament have not been taken on board especially those with the objective of improving the knowledge of foreign languages, mathematics and sciences in primary and secondary education, to achieve an integrated model of professional training, to attract more students to scientific careers, to strengthen cooperation between universities and the industrial and commercial sectors, to encourage educational provision that takes into account labour market demand, to guarantee access to tertiary education for all, to promote lifelong learning and address long-term and youth unemployment accordingly, and to ensure the better communication, dissemination and application of the outcomes of research;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, da med svoje najpomembnejše prednostne naloge vključijo vzpostavitev notranjega trga za energijo, izboljšano politiko R&R na področju nadomestnih energetskih virov ter okolju prijaznejšo in čistejšo energijo, vključno s prizadevanjem za večjo uporabo obnovljive energije, večjim zavzemanjem za prihranek energije in energetsko učinkovitost, pa tudi okrepitvijo političnih in gospodarskih povezav s čim več državami dobaviteljicami, da bi imeli različne energetske vire in bolje reševali pomanjkanje ponudbe;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to include within their top priorities the achievement of an internal market for energy, improved R&D policy on alternative energy sources and more environmentally friendly and cleaner energy, including a push towards the increased use of renewable energies, an increased commitment to energy savings and efficiency, as well as the reinforcement of political and economic links with as many supplier countries as possible in order to diversify energy sources and deal better with shortages of supply;
soglaša s Komisijo, da so razlogi za razlike v stopnjah rasti in inflacije v euro območju vse bolj strukturne narave; v letu 2005 so razlike v rasti segale do 4,5 %, razlike v inflaciji pa do 2,7 %; obžaluje, da različne stopnje inflacije med državami članicami z višjimi stopnjami inflacije negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost in monetarno stabilnost euro območja kot celote; ugotavlja, da so te razlike včasih rezultat pozitivnega procesa konvergence različnih ravni dohodkov in ravni cen, in sicer zaradi procesa zmanjševanja gospodarskega zaostanka; ponovno poziva države, ki so članice euro območja, da povečajo prizadevanja za učinkovito usklajevanje gospodarske in monetarne politike, zlasti s krepitvijo skupnih strategij znotraj Euroskupine zaradi izboljšanja dejanskega zbliževanja gospodarstev in omejitve tveganja asimetričnega šoka v EMU;
Agrees with the Commission that the disparities in growth and inflation rates within the euro area, with differences of up to 4,5 % in growth and up to 2,7 % in inflation in 2005, is increasingly due to structural reasons; regrets that dispersion in inflation rates among Member States with higher inflation rates has a negative effect on the competitiveness and monetary stability of the euro area as a whole; notes that these differences are sometimes part of a positive process of convergence in revenues and price level, due to the "catch up" process; calls once more on Member States of the euro area to strengthen their efforts towards effective coordination of economic and monetary policies notably through the reinforcement of their common strategies within the Eurogroup, in order to improve the real convergence of economies and to limit the risks of asymmetric shock in the EMU;
pozdravlja vključitev Slovenije v euro območje 1. januarja 2007; poziva nove države članice, da sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za izpolnjevanje konvergenčnih meril iz Maastricta in opozarja na dejstvo, da morata ECB in Komisija uporabljati merilo stabilnosti cen, kot je določeno v Pogodbi ES, ki se razlikuje od merila, ki ga ECB uporablja pri izvajanju svoje monetarne politike; predlaga, da ECB in Komisija ocenita, ali je upravičeno ohranjati tako različen pristop;
Welcomes Slovenia to the euro area on 1st January 2007; calls on new Member States to undertake the necessary actions to fulfil the Maastricht convergence criteria and draws attention to the fact that the ECB and the Commission must apply the price stability criterium as set out in the EC Treaty, which differs from that applied by the ECB when conducting its monetary policy, and suggests that the ECB and the Commission evaluate whether it is justified to retain such a difference in approach;
priznava, da v skladu s konvergenčnimi merili iz Maastrichta stopnja inflacije ne sme presegati za več kot 1,5 % stopnje inflacije treh držav članic z najboljšimi doseženimi rezultati na področju stabilnosti cen; poudarja, da je treba pozorno preučiti opredelitev treh najuspešnejših držav članic glede na stabilnost cen kot tudi metodologijo izračunavanja referenčne vrednosti, da bosta odražali dejstvo, da sedaj dvanajst držav članic EU sodeluje v EMU, uporablja skupno valuto, ki se upravlja s skupno monetarno politiko in da razlike v njihovem individualnem obvladovanju inflacije odražajo strukturne dejavnike bolj kot različne izbire makroekonomske politike;
Recognises that according to the Maastricht convergence criteria, the rate of inflation must not exceed by more than 1,5 % that of the three best-performing Member States in terms of price stability; points out that both the definition of the three best-performing Member States in terms of price stability as well as the method of calculating the reference value need to be carefully examined to reflect the fact that there are now twelve Member States participating in the EMU, using a single currency, which is managed by a common monetary policy, and that the differentials in their individual inflation performance reflect structural factors rather than differences in macroeconomic policy stances;
poziva Komisijo in Eurostat, da povečata kakovost statističnih makroekonomskih podatkov (zlasti proračunski primanjkljaj in javni dolg) ter uporabita vsa svoja razpoložljiva sredstva za preprečevanje javnofinančnega neravnovesja v kateri koli državi članici; poziva k nadaljnjemu povečanju pristojnosti Komisije za preverjanje kakovosti posredovanih podatkov;
Calls on the Commission and Eurostat to increase the quality of statistical macro data (especially budgetary deficit and state debt) and to use all their tools to avoid fiscal imbalances in any of the Member States; calls for a further increase of the Commission's powers to verify the quality of the transmitted data;
poziva Komisijo, naj nameni več pozornosti vplivu delovanja finančnih trgov na makroekonomski položaj v euro območju;
Invites the Commission to pay closer attention to the impact of the behaviour of the financial markets on the macroeconomic situation of the euro area;
poziva pristojne nadzornike k večjim prizadevanjem za učinkovitejšo oceno dejavnosti skladov za zavarovanje vlaganj v tvegane naložbe z vidika sistemskih tveganj, ki jih slednji lahko ustvarijo, ter poziva Euroskupino, da obravnava to vprašanje;
Urges the competent supervisors to step up their efforts in order to assess the activities of hedge funds more efficiently with regard to the systemic risks which they may create and invites the Eurogroup to examine this issue;
Zastopanje Unije v razmerju do tretjih držav
External representation