natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je Evropski parlament kot del proračunskega organa odgovoren za čim boljše izvajanje financiranja s strani držav članic v proračun EU; je odločen izboljšati izvajanje programov, ki se bodo financirali v naslednjem finančnem okviru; poziva države članice k zagotovitvi potrdila o njihovih finančnih obveznostih za vse politike v skupni pristojnosti prek uradne predhodne objave v uradnem poročilu in letne naknadne uradne izjave o zanesljivosti, ki jo izda najvišja politična in upravna oblast države članice (finančni minister); zato poziva Komisijo, da uvede primerne mehanizme za odlog plačil, če ta zahteva ni izpolnjena; ni pripravljen predlagati nobenih znatnih povečanj pri financiranju programov brez jamstev držav članic, da bodo odobrile proračunska sredstva; meni, da je sprejetje koncepta "objave v uradnem poročilu" osnovni pogoj za soglasje Evropskega parlamenta k novemu medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu o finančni perspektivi,
considers that the European Parliament, as part of the budgetary authority, has a responsibility to optimise the implementation of funding allocated by the Member States to the EU budget; is determined to improve the implementation of the programmes to be financed under the next financial framework; urges the Member States to provide a certification of their financial commitments for all policies run under shared competencies through a formal ex-ante disclosure swatement and an annual ex-post declaration of assurance, made by the Member States' highest political and managing authority (Finance Minister); in consequence, asks the Commission to introduce the appropriate mechanisms to suspend payments in the event of non-compliance with this request; is not ready to propose any significant increases in funding to programmes without guarantees by the Member States that they will commit the appropriations; considers the acceptance of the concept of "disclosure statements" to be a condition for the European Parliament's consent to a new Interinstitutional Agreement on the Financial Perspective;
odobrava sklepe Evropskega sveta decembra 2004, da je treba na pogajanja o izdatkih Evropske unije gledati v celotnem smislu, vključno z vprašanjem virov lastnih sredstev, korekcijskim mehanizmom in preučitvijo mogoče poenostavitve sistema; poziva k reviziji sistema virov lastnih sredstev, ki bo kratkoročno pripeljal do pravičnejše porazdelitve neto obremenitev in pred iztekom naslednje finančne perspektive ustvaril neodvisen sistem financiranja EU; predlaga, da se priprava takega novega sistema zaupa medparlamentarni konferenci, ki bo vključevala Evropski parlament in nacionalne parlamente, v skladu z duhom protokola k Ustavi o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov,
endorses the conclusions of the European Council of December 2004 that the negotiations on the European Union's expenditure must be seen in an overall context including the question of own resources, the correction mechanism and the examination of a possible simplification of the system; calls for a revision of the own resources system which leads in the short term to a fairer distribution of net burdens and establishes, before the end of the next Financial Perspective, an independent EU funding system; proposes that the work of preparing such a new system should be conferred on an interparliamentary conference, involving the European Parliament and the national parliaments, in keeping with the spirit of the protocol to the Constitution on the role of the national parliaments,
– Finančni instrumenti in sofinanciranje
- Financial instruments and co-financing
naproša Komisijo za predloge, ki bodo spremljali izvajanje vseh skupnih politik z novimi finančnimi instrumenti in mehanizmi sofinanciranja; ti instrumenti bi se morali osredotočiti na tržne neuspehe in na zasebne vlagatelje delovati kot katalizatorji; glavna cilja bi morala biti optimizacija proračuna in velik učinek finančnega vzvoda; to je mogoče doseči še zlasti z jamstvenimi instrumenti za MSP, pa tudi z usmerjeno pomočjo tveganega kapitala, vključno z mrežami poslovnih angelov in prenosom tehnologije;
asks the Commission to make proposals to accompany the implementation of all common policies with new financial instruments and co-financing mechanisms; these instruments should address market failures and act as catalysts for private investors; budget optimisation and a high leverage effect should be key objectives, to be achieved, in particular, by SME guarantee instruments, but also by targeted venture capital support, including to business angels networks and technology transfer;
Del IV Priporočila za stalne odbore o zakonodajnih vidikih
Part IV Recommendations for the standing committees on legislative aspects
meni, da bi morala biti naslednja priporočila okvirna usmeritev za specializirane odbore, brez poseganja v prihodnje zakonodajne odločitve;
Considers that the following recommendations should constitute an indicative orientation for the specialised committees, without prejudice to future legislative decisions;
Konkurenčnost in inovativnost
Competitiveness and innovation
Vesoljski program
Space Programme
ugotavlja, da je evropska vesoljska politika zdaj del okvirnega programa za raziskave; poudarja, pred začetkom veljavnosti ustreznih določb Ustave, v kateri ima vesoljski program svojo pravno podlago (člen III-254), da bi se moralo to obravnavati kot ločeno politično področje z lastno jasno opredeljeno pravno podlago in da se zanj zagotovijo zadostna finančna sredstva in ustrezni finančni instrumenti za podporo raziskovalnih dejavnosti, povezanih z vesoljem, in tudi razvoj in delovanje infrastruktur Galileja in pobude globalnega nadzorovanja okolja in varnosti ter dostopa EU do vesolja; verjame, da bi bilo treba v okvirni program uvesti konkretna pravila, ki bi omogočila izvajanje teh konkretnih dejavnosti;
Notes that the European space policy is now a part of the Research Framework Programme; points out that, in anticipation of the entry into force of the relevant provisions of the Constitution, where the Space Programme has its own legal base (Article III-254), this should be treated as a separate policy area with its own clearly defined legal basis and be endowed with adequate financial resources and appropriate financial instruments to support space-related research activities as well as the development and operation of infrastructures of Galileo and GMES, and EU access to space; believes that particular rules must be introduced into the Framework Programme to enable the implementation of these specific activities;
ugotavlja, da zaradi velikosti projektov in njihovih finančnih okvirov ni resničnega nadomestila za nacionalno financiranje ali financiranje Skupnosti; opaža, da velikokrat izraženo upanje, da bi se povečalo sodelovanje zasebnih vlagateljev, ostaja zaenkrat, z nekaj izjemami, neuresničeno; upošteva sprejetje nove Uredbe (ES) št. 807/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2236/95 o določitvi splošnih pravil za dodelitev finančne pomoči Skupnosti na področju vseevropskih omrežij UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
Notes that, due to the size of projects and their financial envelopes, there is no real substitute for national or Community funding; observes that the often-embraced hope of seeing growth in the participation of private investors remains for the moment, with a few rare exceptions, unrealised; takes note of the adoption of the new Regulation (EC) No 807/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2236/95 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of trans-European networks OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
, kar omogoča usmerjanje pomoči na projekte, ki so je najbolj potrebni (prednostni čezmejni projekti ali tisti, ki prečkajo naravne ovire), in povečanje deleža pomoči za prednostne projekte do največ 20 %-30 % in do 50 % v izjemnih primerih;
, which allows aid to be concentrated on projects which have the greatest need (priority cross-frontier projects, or those crossing natural obstacles), and increases the maximum rate of support for priority projects to 20%-30% and to 50% in exceptional cases;
upošteva zakonodajni predlog za novi program PROGRESS in poudarja pomembnost in potrebnost usklajenega evropskega programa, vključno z zadostnim financiranjem tega področja, ki spodbuja dejavnosti na nacionalni ravni; zato meni, da je treba razširiti finančni okvir programa PROGRESS, če Evropska unija res misli resno z izvajanjem Lizbonske strategije in programa socialne politike;
Takes note of the legislative proposal for the new PROGRESS programme and stresses the importance of, and the need for, a coherent European programme including adequate funding in this area, which stimulates action at national level; considers therefore that the financial framework of PROGRESS must be increased if the European Union is really serious about implementing the Lisbon Strategy and the Social Policy Agenda;
opozarja, da regionalne politike ni mogoče obravnavati ločeno od regionalne zakonodaje, ki ureja dodeljevanje pomoči, ter poziva k skladnosti predlogov, pri čemer je treba preprečiti nastanek pretiranih razlik pri dodeljevanj pomoči regijam, ki mejijo druga na drugo, ker to lahko povzroči izkrivljanje konkurence; opozarja na poseben položaj najbolj oddaljenih regij (člen 299(2) Pogodbe ES), ki v zvezi s parametri kohezijske politike zahteva drugačno obravnavo; predlaga prehodni mehanizem, ki regijam, prizadetim zaradi statističnega učinka, omogoča, da še naprej zahtevajo ustrezno podporo EU, ker nobena regija ne bi smela čutiti, da je trpela zaradi širitve; ob tem poudarja, da je treba v regijah pod vplivom statističnega učinka priznati interakcijo med regionalno politiko in politiko konkurence ter jo zajeti v analizo učinkov, ki jih imajo (ali jih bodo imeli) sedanji in bodoči prepisi o državni pomoči na omenjene regije; poudarja tudi, da je treba regijam v prehodu, zlasti tistim, ki sodijo v okvir cilja 1, a tudi tistim, ki jih krije cilj 2, nuditi primerno podporo in jih prednostno obravnavati pri uporabi pravil glede državne pomoči;
Points out that regional policy cannot be seen in isolation from regional aid law and calls for proposals to be coherent and for excessive disparity in assistance between neighbouring regions to be avoided, since this can lead to glaring distortions of competition; highlights the particular situation of the outermost regions (Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty), which require differential treatment vis-à-vis the cohesion policy parameters; proposes a transitional mechanism to allow the regions affected by the statistical effect to continue to require adequate support from the EU, since no region should feel that it has suffered as a result of enlargement; points out, furthermore, that the interaction between regional policy and competition policy in the regions affected by the statistical effect must be acknowledged and must be included in the analysis of the effects which current and future rules on state aid have (or will have) on such regions, and also that regions in transition, especially those technically falling under objective 1 but also those covered by objective 2, should receive adequate support and be given preferential treatment in the application of State aid rules;
pozdravlja objavo osnutka besedila, v katerem skuša Komisija uvesti jamstveni instrument za posojila EU, namenjena projektom TEN na področju prometa; meni, da bi se lahko ta ureditev razširila tudi na druga področja, s ciljem pospeševanja naložb, potrebnih za dosego lizbonskih ciljev;
Welcomes the publication by the Commission of a draft text which seeks to introduce an EU loan guarantee instrument for TEN projects in the transport sphere; takes the view that such an arrangement could be extended to cover other areas with the aim of fostering the investment required to achieve the Lisbon objectives;
meni, da je glavni cilj skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) zagotovitev modela večfunkcionalnosti evropskega kmetijskega sektorja, da se zaščiti delovanje notranjega trga kmetijskih proizvodov in ustreznimi dohodki kmetov zaradi zagotovitve doma pridelanih kakovostnih kmetijskih proizvodov, vključno z visokimi zdravstvenimi standardi in standardi dobrega počutja živali, za zagotovitev nadaljnje podpore za podeželska območja, ki zaostajajo za mestnimi območji glede na dohodke, infrastrukturo in dostop do storitev, spodbujanja trajnostnih in okolju prijaznih kmetijskih praks zaradi ohranitve okolja in, z Lizbonsko strategijo v ozadju, krepitve konkurenčnosti evropske kmetijske industrije, tako da bo lahko prispevala k zagotavljanju delovnih mest v kmetijskem sektorju;
Considers that a major objective of the CAP is to guarantee the model of multifunctionality of the European agricultural sector, to secure the functioning of the internal market in agricultural products and appropriate incomes for farmers, to guarantee the availability of home-produced, high quality agricultural products, including high standards of animal health and welfare, to provide further support for rural areas which lag far behind urban areas in terms of income, infrastructure and access to services, to promote sustainable and environmentally friendly farming practices in order to preserve the environment and, against the background of the Lisbon Strategy, to strengthen the competitiveness of the European farming industry, so that it can make a contribution to securing jobs in the agricultural sector;
ugotavlja, da je Evropska unija od leta 1999 izvedla pomembne reforme SKP in organizacij skupnega trga; na tej podlagi poziva Komisijo, da partnerjem EU pojasni, koliko so proizvajalci Skupnosti že žrtvovali kot rezultat teh reform, in da brani večnamenski model za evropsko kmetijstvo na trgovskih pogajanjih o razvojnem programu iz Dohe; nadalje poudarja potrebo po ohranjanju prednostne obravnave Skupnosti, zlasti z doseganjem pravičnega in nepristranskega ravnotežja med zahtevami držav v razvoju po dostopu do trga ter stabilnostjo in vitalnostjo trgov Skupnosti, tako da bi lahko učinkovito upravljali te trge in se izognili krizam, ki bi dodatno finančno bremenile Evropsko unijo in tako ustvarile nove proračunske težave;
Notes the significant reforms of the CAP and the common market organisations which the European Union has carried out since 1999; on that basis, calls on the Commission to make clear to the EU's partners the major sacrifices which have already been made by Community producers as a result of those reforms and to defend, in the Doha development agenda trade negotiations, the multifunctional model for European agriculture; emphasises, further, the need to safeguard the Community preference, in particular by striking a fair and equitable balance between requests from the developing countries for market access and the stability and viability of Community markets, so that those markets can be effectively managed and crises which would impose additional financial burdens on the European Union, and thus create fresh budgetary problems, can be avoided;
opozarja, da je temeljna politična reforma v kmetijstvu v letu 2003, vključno z reformo skoraj vseh organizacij skupnega trga, temeljila na veljavnem finančnem okvirju, določenem v sklepu Evropskega sveta oktobra 2002; nadalje opozarja, da se je Evropski parlament strinjal s Pogodbo in Aktom o pogojih pristopa desetih novih držav članic, ki je svoje finančne vidike, povezane s kmetijstvom, zasnoval na podlagi sporazuma Evropskega sveta;
Recalls that the fundamental agricultural policy reform in 2003, including the reform of nearly all common market organisations, was based on the validity of the financial framework laid down in the decision of the European Council in October 2002; recalls furthermore that the European Parliament has agreed to the Treaty and Act concerning the conditions of the accession of the 10 new Member States, which based its financial aspects concerning agriculture on the European Council's agreement;
meni, da je skupna ribiška politika (SRP) eden od bistvenih elementov okoljskih prizadevanj EU za vzpostavitev ponovnega ravnotežja morskega ekosistema, v katerem so nekatere vrste preveč izkoriščane; meni, da so sredstva, ki jih predvideva Komisija, absolutni minimum, potreben za ohranitev ribjih staležev in za doseganje ciljev, ki temeljijo na trajnostnem razvoju in so bili dogovorjeni ob reformi skupne ribiške politike leta 2002; meni, da mora SRP bolje upoštevati položaj ribičev in biti zlasti pozorna na najbolj oddaljene regije;
Considers the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) an essential element, amongst others, of the European Union's environmental efforts to rebalance the marine ecosystem, some species of which are being over-exploited; considers that the funding provided for by the Commission is the essential minimum required for conservation of stocks and for the purposes of achieving the objectives based on sustainable development which were agreed when the CFP was reformed in 2002; considers that the CFP must take better account of the situation of fishermen and pay particular attention to the specific case of the extremely remote regions;
meni, da se je okoljska politika EU izkazala za bistven instrument pri blaženju posledic podnebnih sprememb, zaviranju propada naravnih življenjskih prostorov in biološke raznolikosti, zaščiti vodnih virov, izboljšanju okolja, zdravja in kakovosti življenja, spodbujanju trajnostnega izkoriščanja in upravljanja naravnih virov in odpadkov ter pri razvoju strateških pristopov k razvojni politiki ter izvajanju in povečanju obveščenosti/ozaveščenosti, kot tudi trajnostni gospodarski rasti, zaposlovanju in ekološki koheziji;
Is of the opinion that the European Union's environmental policy has proven to be an essential instrument in contributing to mitigating the effects of climate change, halting the decline in natural habitats and bio-diversity, protecting water resources, improving the environment, health and the quality of life, promoting the sustainable use and management of natural resources and waste and developing strategic approaches to policy development, implementation and information/awareness raising as well as sustainable economic growth and employment and ecological cohesion;
poudarja, da področja okoljske politike prispevajo k doseganju lizbonskih in göteborških ciljev; je močno naklonjen vključitvi področij okoljske politike na področja drugih politik; poudarja, da se morajo okoljski vidiki in vplivi na okolje, kot so okoljske tehnologije, okoljske raziskave in varstvo okolja, v celoti upoštevati pri financiranju politik v okviru razdelka 1 in razdelka 2;
Points out that environmental policy areas contribute to the attainment of the Lisbon and Gothenburg objectives; is strongly in favour of mainstreaming environmental policy areas into other policy areas; emphasises that environmental aspects and impacts such as environmental technologies, environmental research and nature protection have to be fully taken into account in financing policies under Heading 1 and under Heading 2;
Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice
An area of Freedom, Security and Justice
pozdravlja prizadevanja za poenostavitev in racionalizacijo sedanjih razmer na tem področju z opredelitvijo treh okvirnih programov ("Solidarnost", "Varnost" in "Pravica"), ki bodo omogočili večjo prilagodljivost pri razporejanju prednostnih nalog med različnimi dejavnostmi, vendar pa poudarja, da ta pristop ne bi smela zmanjšati političnega in proračunskega nadzora s strani Evropskega parlamenta; svari, da morajo uvedbo pojma "skupno upravljanje z državami članicami" za izvajanje programov s tega področja spremljati ustrezni nadzorni mehanizmi;
Welcomes the efforts to simplify and rationalise the current situation in this area through the definition of three framework programmes ("Solidarity", "Security" and "Justice"), which will also allow for greater flexibility in the allocation of priorities among the different actions, but stresses that this approach should not diminish the political and budgetary control by the European Parliament; warns that the introduction of the notion of "shared management with Member States" for implementing the programmes in this area needs to be accompanied by adequate control mechanisms;
odloži, dokler Komisija ne predstavi svojih zakonodajnih predlogov, svoje končno mnenje v zvezi s posebno vsebino programov in zlasti v zvezi s tem, ali bo delež globalnih skladov, ki jih je za vsak program predlagala Komisija, zadostoval za potrebno preglednost glavnih prednostnih nalog Evropskega parlamenta na tem področju: spodbujanje temeljnih pravic, krepitev varnosti državljanov in učinkovito izvajanje skupne priseljenske in azilne politike (zlasti v zvezi z Evropskim skladom za begunce);
Reserves, until after the Commission presents legislative proposals, its final opinion on the specific content of the programmes and particularly whether the proportion of the global funds proposed by the Commission for each programme is adequate to give the necessary visibility to the European Parliament's main priorities in this area: the promotion of fundamental rights, reinforcement of the security of citizens and effective implementation of common immigration and asylum policies (particularly with regard to the Refugee Fund);
Varstvo potrošnikov in javno zdravje
Consumer protection and public health
poziva Komisijo, da brez zamude predloži zakonodajne predloge za novo potrošniško politiko in program javnega zdravja, da lahko Evropski parlament in Svet pravočasno začneta z zakonodajnim delom in omogočita, da začneta programa veljati v začetku leta 2007; je še vedno prepričan, da bo razdelitev na nov program potrošniške politike in nov program javnega zdravja najboljša rešitev za doseganje prednostnih ciljev EU; poudarja, da je treba finančna sredstva, dodeljena novemu programu, znatno povečati glede na trenutno stanje; opaža, da je treba upoštevati učinek prejšnje širitve in bodoče širitve na države z deficiti na področju zdravja in potrošnikov, pa tudi predlagano širitev ciljev programa;
Calls on the Commission to submit the legislative proposals for the new Consumer Policy and Public Health programme without any delay, in order to enable the European Parliament and the Council to begin legislative work in time to allow for the programmes to enter into force at the beginning of 2007; is still convinced that a division into a new Consumer Policy programme and a new Public Health programme will provide the best solution to meet the EU's priorities; underlines that the financial resources allocated to the new programme need to be substantially increased compared to the current situation; observes that the impact of the previous enlargement round and the future enlargement on countries with deficits in the health and consumer field as well as the proposed widening of the scope of the programme need to be taken into account;
meni, da je za mobilnost študentov v zvezi s programom Erasmus treba povečati povprečje štipendij; meni, bi moral v obdobju trajanja programa cilj podprograma Comenius biti vključevanje večjega števila dijakov v skupne dejavnosti izobraževanja; meni, da te izboljšave programa zahtevajo znatno povečanje referenčnega zneska, ki ga predlaga Komisija;
Believes that an increase in the average Erasmus student mobility grant is necessary; believes that, over the lifetime of the programme, the Comenius sub-programme should aim to involve more pupils in joint educational activities; considers that these improvements to the programme require a substantial increase in the reference amount proposed by the Commission;
Spodbujanje evropske kulture in raznolikosti
Fostering European culture and diversity