natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, zlasti v Italiji, Bolgariji, Romuniji, Češki republiki in Estoniji, kot je bilo poudarjeno v nedavnih kritikah zakona o medijih in ustavnih sprememb, sprejetih na Madžarskem med junijem in decembrom 2010, ki so jih izrazile mednarodne organizacije, kot so OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, številna mednarodna in nacionalna združenja novinarjev, uredniki in publicisti, nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Komisija,
B. whereas media pluralism and freedom continue to be matters of grave concern in the EU and its Member States, notably in Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, the Czech Republic and Estonia, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media law and constitutional changes enacted in Hungary between June and December 2010 which has been voiced by international organisations, such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, by a large number of international and national journalists’ organisations, by editors and publishers, by NGOs active in the areas of human rights and civil liberties, and by Member States and the Commission,
C. ker je Komisija izrazila pomisleke in od madžarske vlade zahtevala informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo madžarskega zakona o medijih z direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah in pravnim redom Skupnosti na splošno, zlasti glede obveznosti uravnoteženega poročanja, ki velja za vse ponudnike avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, pri čemer je pod vprašaj postavila tudi njegovo skladnost z načelom sorazmernosti in spoštovanjem temeljne pravice do svobode izražanja in obveščanja iz člena 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, načelom države izvora in zahtevami za prijavo; ker se je Madžarska na to odzvala tako, da je zagotovila dodatne informacije ter začela postopek spremembe zakona, da bi upoštevala pomisleke, ki jih je izrazila Komisija,
C. whereas the Commission raised concerns and requested information from the Hungarian Government regarding the conformity of the Hungarian media law with the AVMSD and the acquis communautaire in general, notably in relation to the obligation to offer balanced coverage applicable to all audiovisual media service providers, and also questioned whether that law complied with the principle of proportionality and respected the fundamental right to freedom of expression and information enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the country-of-origin principle and registration requirements, and whereas the Hungarian Government responded by providing further information and by commencing the process of amending the law to address the points raised by the Commission,
, ter navedel, da nova zakonodaja ogroža pluralizem medijev, ukinja politično in finančno neodvisnost javnih medijev, dolgoročno utrjuje negativne elemente za svobodne medije, organ za medije in svet za medije pa sta politično homogena Pismo predstavnika OVSE za svobodo medijev Odboru za državljanske pravice, pravosodje in notranje zadeve dne 14. januarja 2010.
, indicating that the new legislation undermined media pluralism, abolished the political and financial independence of the public-service media and cemented the negative features for the free media in the long term, and that the Media Authority and Media Council were politically homogeneous Letter of 14 January 2010 from the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media to the Chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.
in izvajata oster in centraliziran vladni in politični nadzor nad vsemi mediji; ker so nadaljnji pomisleki vključevali nesorazmerne in zelo stroge kazni na podlagi spornih in neopredeljenih razlogov, pomanjkanje avtomatičnega postopka za prekinitev kazni v primeru pritožbe na sodišču zoper sodbo organa za medije, kršitev načela zaupnosti novinarskih virov in varstvo družinskih vrednot,
and exerted pervasive and centralised governmental and political control over all media; whereas further concerns included the disproportionate and extreme penalties imposed for debatable and undefined reasons, the lack of an automatic procedure for suspending penalties in the event of an appeal to the courts against a Media Authority ruling, the violation of the principle of the confidentiality of journalistic sources and the protection of family values,
E. ker se strinja s pomisleki OVSE v zvezi s politično homogeno sestavo organa za medije in sveta za medije, časovnim okvirom, izvajanjem ostrega in centraliziranega vladnega, sodnega in političnega nadzora nad vsemi mediji in dejstvom, da so najbolj sporne značilnosti zakonodaje v nasprotju s standardi OVSE in mednarodnimi standardi o svobodi izražanja, na primer odprava politične in finančne neodvisnosti javnih medijev, področje uporabe zakona (materialno in teritorialno) ter odločitev, da se ne opredelijo osnovni pojmi, zaradi česar novinarji ne morejo vedeti, ali morebiti kršijo zakon,
E. sharing the serious reservations expressed by the OSCE in relation to the politically homogeneous composition of the Media Authority and Media Council, the timeframe, the exertion of a pervasive and centralised governmental, judicial and political control over all media, the fact that the most problematic features of the legislation contravene OSCE and international standards on freedom of expression, for example by doing away with the political and financial independence of public-service media, the scope of the regulation (material and territorial), and the decision not to define key terms, making it impossible for journalists to know when they may be breaking the law,
F. ker je komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice pozval madžarske oblasti, naj pri pregledu zakona o medijih upoštevajo standarde Sveta Evrope o svobodi izražanja in pluralnosti medijev, ustrezna priporočila odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope, zlasti pa zavezujoče standarde iz Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice; ker je navedel uporabo nejasnih opredelitev, ki jih je mogoče narobe tolmačiti, ustanovitev politično neuravnoteženega regulativnega mehanizma z nesorazmernimi pooblastili, ki ni predmet celovitega sodnega nadzora, ogroženo neodvisnost storitev javne radiotelevizije in spodkopavanje zaščite novinarskih virov informacij; ker je poudaril tudi, da bi morale vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, vključno z opozicijskimi strankami in civilno družbo, imeti možnost smiselnega sodelovanja pri pregledu te zakonodaje, ki določa tako pomemben vidik delovanja demokratične družbe http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp .
F. whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights called on the Hungarian authorities, when reviewing the media law, to take account of Council of Europe standards on freedom of expression and media pluralism, the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and, in particular, the binding standards set out in the ECHR and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights; whereas he referred to the use of unclear definitions which are open to misinterpretation, the establishment of politically unbalanced regulatory machinery with disproportionate powers which is not subject to full judicial supervision, threats to the independence of public-service broadcast media, and erosion of the protection of journalists’ sources; whereas he also stressed the need for all relevant stakeholders, including opposition parties and civil society, to be able to participate in a meaningful manner in the review of this legislation, which regulates such a fundamental aspect of the functioning of a democratic society http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp .
G. ker je v drugem mnenju, izdanem 25. februarja 2011, komisar za človekove pravice priporočil celovito revizijo svežnja madžarske zakonodaje o medijih, med drugim zaradi obnovitve natančne zakonodaje, ki bo spodbujala pluralne in neodvisne medije ter še trdneje zagotavljala, da na regulativne mehanizme za medije ne bo mogoče politično vplivati https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1751289 .
G. whereas, in a second opinion issued on 25 February 2011, the Commissioner for Human Rights recommends a ‘wholesale review’ of the Hungarian media law package, with the objectives, inter alia, of reinstating precise legislation promoting a pluralistic and independent media, and strengthening the guarantees that media regulatory mechanisms will be immune from political influence https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1751289 .
; ker v nadaljevanju ugotavlja, da morajo biti mediji na Madžarskem sposobni opravljati vlogo psa čuvaja v pluralni demokratični družbi, da bi to dosegla pa mora Madžarska spoštovati obveznosti, ki jih je sprejela kot članica Sveta Evrope, ter čim bolje izkoristiti znanje in izkušnje te organizacije na področju svobode izražanja ter medijske neodvisnosti in pluralnosti,
; whereas he further states that the media in Hungary must be able to perform their role as watchdog in a pluralistic democratic society and that in order to achieve this, Hungary should abide by its commitments as a member state of the Council of Europe and make the most of that organisation’s expertise in the fields of freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism,
H . ker bi bilo treba zato nujno opustiti izvajanje madžarskega zakona o medijih ter zakon revidirati na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Komisije, OVSE in Sveta Evrope, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bo povsem v skladu z zakonodajo EU in evropskimi vrednotami ter standardi o svobodi in pluralnosti ter neodvisnem upravljanju medijev,
H. whereas the Hungarian media law should consequently be suspended as a matter of urgency and reviewed on the basis of the Commission’s, OSCE’s and Council of Europe’s comments and proposals, in order to ensure that it is fully in conformity with EU law and European values and standards on media freedom, pluralism and independent media governance,
I. ker je kljub večkratnim pozivom Parlamenta k pripravi direktive o svobodi, pluralnosti in neodvisnem upravljanju medijev Komisija doslej odlašala s tem predlogom, ki postaja vedno bolj potreben in nujen,
I. whereas, despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on media freedom, pluralism and independent governance, the Commission has up to now delayed this proposal, which has become increasingly necessary and urgent,
J. ker bi köbenhavnska merila za članstvo v EU, ki se nanašajo na svobodo tiska in izražanja in so bila določena junija1993 na Evropskem svetu v Köbenhavnu, morale podpreti vse države članice EU ter jih uveljaviti prek ustrezne zakonodaje EU,
J. whereas the Copenhagen criteria for EU membership, as established in June 1993 at the Copenhagen European Council, relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression should be upheld by all EU Member States and enforced through relevant EU legislation,
K. ker je Sodišče v združenih zadevah C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P v odstavkih 45 in 46 razsodilo, da dostop do informacij državljanom omogoča tesnejše sodelovanje v postopku odločanja, upravi pa v demokratičnem sistemu omogoča, da ima večjo legitimnost, je bolj učinkovita in odgovorna do državljanov, kar je pogoj za učinkovito uveljavljanje njihovih demokratičnih pravic,
K. whereas, in paragraphs 45 and 46 of its judgment in joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, the Court of Justice has held that access to information enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system and that it ‘is a precondition for the effective exercise of citizens’ democratic rights’,
2. pozdravlja sodelovanje Komisije z madžarskimi organi pri usklajevanju madžarskih medijev s pravom Skupnosti in pogodbami ter začetek postopka spremembe na nacionalni ravni;
Welcomes the Commission’s cooperation with the Hungarian authorities to bring Hungarian media law into conformity with EU Treaties and law, and the commencement of the amending process at national level;
4. poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s skrbnim spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem skladnosti madžarskega zakona o medijih, kot je bil spremenjen skladno z evropsko zakonodajo, zlasti z Listino o temeljnih pravicah;
Calls on the Commission to continue the close monitoring and assessment of the conformity of Hungarian media law as amended in accordance with European legislation, particularly with the Charter on Fundamental Rights;
8. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice, OVSE in Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and parliaments of Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
o redkih zemljah
on rare earths
PE459.737v01-00 B7‑0192/2011 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o redkih zemljah
PE459.737v00-01 B7‑0192/2011 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on rare earths
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor O–000036/2011 , O–000043/2011 in O–000041/2011 ,
– having regard to questions for oral answer O–000036/2011 , O–000043/2011 and O–000041/2011 ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o industrijski politiki za dobo globalizacije ( 2010/2095(INI) ),
– having regard to the report on an Industrial Policy for the Globalised Era ( 2010/2095(INI) ),
A. ker se redke zemlje uporabljajo za proizvodnjo ekranov, mobilnih telefonov in drugih naprav za vsakodnevno uporabo, in ker so ključnega pomena za izdelavo zelo zmogljivih trajnih magnetov, ki se uporabljajo pri vetrnih turbinah, električnih vozilih, avtomobilskih katalizatorjih, vezjih, optičnih vlaknih in visoko temperaturnih superprevodnikih;
A. whereas rare earths are used in the production of monitors, mobile phones and other appliances in daily use, and whereas they are essential for the manufacture of high-performance permanent magnets used in wind turbines, electric vehicles, catalytic converters for cars, circuits, optical fibre and high-temperature superconductors,
B. ker je EU popolnoma odvisna od uvoza surovin in ker bosta gonilo za povpraševanje po surovinah prihodnji razvoj gospodarstev v vzponu in hitra širitev ključnih spodbujevalnih tehnologij,
B. whereas the EU is fully dependent on imports of raw materials, and whereas the demand for raw materials will be driven by future developments in emerging economies and the rapid dissemination of key enabling technologies,
C. ker se, za razliko od elektrike, s surovinami in redkimi zemljami trguje na svetovni ravni, trgi za nekatere surovine in redke zemlje so manj pregledni in ker so količine, s katerimi se trguje, zelo majhne v primerjavi z drugimi materiali,
C. whereas, unlike electricity, raw materials and rare earths are traded globally, the markets for certain raw materials and rare earths are less transparent and trading volumes are very low compared with those for other materials,
D. ker imajo izkopavanje, rafiniranje in recikliranje redkih zemelj, če se ne izpeljejo pravilno, resne okoljske posledice,
D. whereas the mining, refining and recycling of rare earths has serious environmental consequences if not managed properly,
o obnovi protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med ES in Mavretanijo
on the Renewal of the Protocol of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EC and Mauritania
PE459.738v01-00 B7‑0193/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o obnovi protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med ES in Mavretanijo
PE459.738v01-00 B7‑0193/2011 European Parliament resolution on the Renewal of the Protocol of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EC and Mauritania
– ob upoštevanju člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– upoštevanju Priloge II okvirnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 20. februarja 2010,
– having regard to Annex II of the Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission of 20 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije Svetu o pooblastilu Komisije, da v imenu Evropske unije začne pogajanja za obnovitev Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju z Mavretanijo (SEC(2011)137 končno),
– having regard to the Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the Commission to open negotiations on behalf of the European Union for the renewal of the protocol of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement with Mauritania (SEC(2011)137 final),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja za ustni odgovor Komisiji o obnovitvi Protokola k Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med EU in Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo (B7 0015/2011),
– having regard to the oral question to the Commission on the Renewal of the Protocol of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the EU and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania (B7 0015/2011),
– ob upoštevanju sedanjega protokola, ki poteče 31. decembra 2012,
– having regard to the current protocol, which expires on 31st December 2012,
A. ker sedanji protokol k Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju z Islamsko republiko Mavretanijo poteče 31. julija 2012 in ker namerava Evropska komisija začeti pogajanja za njegovo obnovitev, zaradi česar je v skladu s predpisi zaprosila Svet za mandat,
A. whereas the current protocol to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement with the Islamic Republic of Mauritania expires on 31 July 2012 and the European Commission intention to launch negotiations for its renewal, for which it has requested the prescriptive mandate from the Council,
B. ker člen 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določa jasne pogoje, pod katerimi mora biti Evropski parlament vključen v odločanje o sporazumih o ribištvu, zaradi česar je želja Evropskega parlamenta, da sodeluje v procesu ter zastopa svoja stališča v pogajanjih o novih protokolih, legitimna,
B. whereas Article 218 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union provides for clear conditions under which the European Parliament should be associated to decisions made on fisheries agreements, which legitimate the European Parliament wish to collaborate in the process expressing its priorities for the new Protocols to be renegotiated,
D. ker je sporazum z Mavretanijo eden od štirih preostalih mešanih sporazumov s tretjimi državami in je zato bistven za flote EU, pa tudi izjemnega pomena za oskrbo trga Evropske unije s številnimi ribiškimi proizvodi, ki na tem trgu primanjkujejo,
D. whereas the Agreement with Mauritania is one of the four remaining mixed agreements with third countries and in this regard is essential for the EU fleets, and is of utmost importance to supply the European Union market in a wide range of fisheries products, of which it is highly deficient,
F. ker so zaporedni protokoli, podpisani z Mavretanijo, omogočili znaten napredek pri podpiranju razvoja mavretanskega ribiškega sektorja, ohranjanju ribolovnih zalog in izboljšanju nadzora, čeprav obstajajo vidiki, ki jih je treba še okrepiti in razjasniti, vključno z delovanjem nadzora prek sistema VMS, izmenjavo podatkov o vkrcanju in spodbujanjem določene infrastrukture, naj podpira večje naložbe EU v Mavretaniji,
F. whereas the successive Protocols signed with Mauritania have allowed substantial progress in supporting the development of the Mauritanian fisheries sector, conservation of the fishing stock and improvement in the control, although there are aspects that still need to be strengthened and clarified, including the operation of the control by VMS, sharing of information regarding boarding, and the promotion of certain infrastructure to encourage greater community investment in Mauritania,
G. ker je treba pri pogajanjih o ribolovnih priložnostih novega protokola upoštevati odnose ribiškega sektorja Mavretanije s tretjimi državami, ki tudi izkoriščajo možnosti ribolova v izključnih ekonomskih conah v okviru dvostranskih ali zasebnih sporazumov,
G. whereas it is necessary, when negotiating fishing opportunities of the new protocol to take into account the relations of Mauritanian fisheries sector with third countries which also exploit the EEZ fishing opportunities through bilateral or private agreements,
H. ker so, kot je navedeno v osnutku mandata, glavni cilji novega protokola krepitev dialoga o sektorski politiki z namenom, spodbujanje izvajanja odgovorne ribiške politike, razvoj ribiške industrije v Mavretaniji ter prispevanje h gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju v skladu z razvojnimi cilji te države,
H. whereas the main objectives of the New Protocol, as expressed in the Draft Mandate are strengthening dialogue on sectoral policy with a view to encourage the implementation of a responsible fisheries policy, developing the fisheries industry in Mauritania, and contributing to the economic and social development, in line with the development objectives of the country,
1. se strinja s stališčem, ki ga je podala Komisija ob prejšnjih sporazumih o ribolovu, da bi moralo biti obdobje veljavnosti protokola čim daljše, da se omogoči boljše načrtovanje poslovnih dejavnosti ter zagotovijo večja stalnost in naložbeni projekti skupnosti, da se zagotovi stabilen in stalen okvir ukrepov za podporo industriji ter ribiški politiki v Mavretaniji ter da se opravijo znanstvene raziskave o stanju virov;
Shares the point of view expressed by the Commission on previous fisheries agreements that the duration of the Protocol should be as wide as possible to allow better planning of business activities and to ensure greater continuity and community investment projects, to provide a stable framework and continuous measures to support the industry and sectoral fisheries policy in Mauritania and to pursue scientific research on the status of the resources;
3. vztraja, da je pridobivanje zanesljivih informacij in podatkov o ribolovnih možnosti tretjih držav v mavretanskih vodah poglavitni element, ki ga je treba upoštevati pri pogajanjih za opredelitev presežka virov, ki jih je mogoče dati na voljo EU;
Insists on getting reliable information and figures on the fishing opportunity of third countries in the waters of Mauritania as a key element to take into account during the negotiations in order to identify the surplus resources that can be made available to the EU;
6. na enak način bi morala biološka obnovitev, opisana v novem protokolu, temeljiti samo na znanstvenih merilih, brez diskriminacijskih elementov, njen edini namen in cilj pa mora biti trajnost virov;
In the same way biological recovery periods described in the new protocol should be based on scientific criteria only, with no discriminatory elements and having as sole purpose and objective the sustainability of the resources;
11. je zaskrbljen zaradi nezakonitih vkrcanj mavretanskih oblasti na plovila Unije, saj gre za ponavljajočo se težavo, zlasti povezano z dejstvi iz prejšnjega odstavka; poudarja, da mavretanski organi ne spoštujejo Poglavja VI Priloge II protokola, zlasti odstavka 3 o postopkih v primeru vkrcanja na plovila;
Shows its concern about illegal boarding of community vessels by the Mauritanian authorities, which is a recurrent problem linked, notably, to the facts reported in the previous paragraph; underlines the non compliance of the Mauritanian authorities with the Chapter VI of Annex II of the protocol, in particular its paragraph 3 on the procedures in case boarding of vessels;
13. poziva Komisijo, naj pravočasno obvesti Evropski parlament o naknadnem vrednotenju veljavnega protokola, da bi zagotovili dovolj informacij za njegovo oceno in opredelitev ponavljajočih se težav;
Asks the Commission to inform the European Parliament, in due time, on the ex-post evaluation of the current Protocol, in order to have sufficient elements to asses the Protocol and to identify persistent problems;