natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja potrebo po poglobljeni analizi vsakega posameznega primera, preden se sprejmejo sankcije, da se oceni možen učinek različnih sankcij in določi, katere sankcije so najučinkovitejše glede na vse ostale pomembne dejavnike in primerljive izkušnje; meni, da je takšna predhodna preučitev toliko bolj utemeljena, ker se je težko vrniti nazaj, ko se postopek sankcij enkrat začne, ne da bi to ogrozilo verodostojnost EU ali izražanje podpore EU prebivalstvu ciljne tretje države, glede na to, da lahko organi te države izrabijo odločitev EU; v tem smislu upošteva sedanjo prakso, po kateri Svet razpravlja o ustreznosti, naravi in učinkovitosti predlaganih sankcij na podlagi ocene vodij misije EU v zadevni državi, ter poziva k vključitvi neodvisnega strokovnega poročila v takšno oceno;
Underlines the need for an in-depth analysis of each specific situation prior to the adoption of sanctions in order to assess the potential impact of different sanctions, and to determine which are the most effective in the light of all other relevant factors and comparable experiences; considers that such prior analysis is all the more justified since it is difficult to backtrack once the sanctions process has been initiated without undermining the EU's credibility and the expression of the EU's support for the population of the target third country, given the fact that the country's authorities can instrumentalise the EU decision; takes note in this respect of the current practice whereby the appropriateness, nature and effectiveness of the proposed sanctions are discussed in the Council on the basis of assessment by the EU Heads of Mission in the country concerned, and calls for the inclusion of an independent expert's report in such assessment;
vendar poudarja, da se takšne analize ne bi smele uporabiti za odložitev sprejetja sankcij; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da dvostopenjski postopek za naložitev sankcij v okviru SZVP določa področje delovanja za nujni politični odziv, sprva prek sprejetja skupnega stališča, ki se določi po poglobljeni analizi uredbe s podrobno opredelitvijo natančne vrste in področja delovanja sankcij;
Stresses, however, that such analysis should not be used to delay the adoption of sanctions; emphasises in this respect that the two-step procedure for the imposition of sanctions under the CFSP provides scope for an urgent political reaction, initially through the adoption of a common position to be set out after a more in-depth analysis of the Regulation, detailing the exact nature and scope of the sanctions;
poziva, da se v pravne instrumente sistematično vključijo jasna in posebna merila uspešnosti kot pogoji za odpravo sankcij; vztraja zlasti, da se referenčna merila oblikujejo na podlagi neodvisne strokovne ocene in da se kasneje ne spreminjajo glede na politične spremembe znotraj Sveta;
Calls for the systematic inclusion in the legal instruments of clear and specific benchmarks as conditions for the lifting of the sanctions; insists, in particular, that the reference criteria should be established on the basis of an independent evaluation and that those criteria should not be altered at a later stage, depending on political changes within the Council;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da vzpostavita vzorčen postopek pregleda sankcij, ki bo vključeval predvsem sistematično vključitev klavzule o pregledu, ki uvaja ponovno obravnavo režima sankcij na podlagi določenih meril uspešnosti ter oceno, ali so bili cilji izpolnjeni; vztraja, da je treba pozdraviti izjave o nameri ali pripravljenost, da se vzpostavijo postopki, ki vodijo k pozitivnim rezultatom, vendar poudarja, da te pri ocenjevanju sankcij v nobenem primeru ne smejo nadomestiti doseganja vidnega in dejanskega napredka v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem referenčnih meril;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to set up an exemplary sanctions review process, notably involving the systematic inclusion of a review clause which entails revisiting the sanctions regime on the basis of the established benchmarks and assessing whether the objectives have been met; insists that declarations of intent or the will to establish procedures that will produce positive results are to be welcomed, but stresses that they should under no circumstances, when sanctions are evaluated, replace the achievement of tangible and genuine progress in meeting reference criteria;
meni, da embargo na orožje proti Kitajski kaže skladnost in doslednost EU, saj je bil ta embargo uveden po pokolu v Tiananmenu leta 1989, in da ni razloga za njegovo odpravo, ker EU do zdaj ni prejela nobenih pojasnil o pokolu;
Believes that the arms embargo imposed on China is an illustration of EU coherence and consistency, given that this embargo was originally established following the 1989 Tiananmen massacre and the EU has not received to date any explanations about that massacre, and that there is therefore no reason to lift this embargo;
poziva formacijo za sankcije Delovne skupine svetovalcev za zunanje odnose (RELEX/sankcije), da v celoti izpolni svoj mandat; vztraja zlasti, da je treba pred sprejetjem sankcij izvesti raziskavo in po njihovem sprejetju zagotoviti redne posodobljene informacije o nadaljnjem poteku dogodkov ter razviti najboljše prakse v zvezi z izvajanjem in uveljavljanjem omejevalnih ukrepov;
Calls on the "Sanctions" formation of the Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party (RELEX/Sanctions) to fulfil their mandate to the full; insists in particular on the need to conduct research prior to the adoption of sanctions and, after their adoption, to provide on a regular basis updated information on developments and to develop best practices with regard to the implementation and enforcement of restrictive measures;
priznava, da so države članice ter mednarodne in regionalne organizacije odgovorne za mednarodno nezakonita dejanja pri izvajanju sankcij, ter v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po sodnem mehanizmu, ki bi zagotavljal skladnost z mednarodnim in humanitarnim pravom;
Recognises that states as well as international and regional organisations should be accountable for internationally wrongful acts in the implementation of sanctions and stresses in this regard the need for a judicial mechanism with a view to guaranteeing conformity with international law and humanitarian law;
zahteva, da Parlament sodeluje na vseh stopnjah postopka sankcij: v postopku sprejemanja odločitev za sankcije in pri izbiri najustreznejših sankcij za posamezne primere, opredelitvi meril uspešnosti, oceni njihovega izvajanja v okviru mehanizma za pregled ter odpravi sankcij;
Requests that Parliament be associated in all the stages of a sanctions process: the decision-making process leading to sanctions, the selection of the sanctions most appropriate to the situation, and also the definition of benchmarks and the evaluation of their implementation within the framework of the review mechanism and the lifting of the sanction;
Ciljno usmerjene sankcije kot učinkovitejše orodje?
Targeted sanctions as a more efficient tool?
obžaluje, da ni mogoče presojati učinkovitosti ciljnih ukrepov, ker se ne izvaja ocenjevanje; kljub temu priznava veliko humanitarno skrb EU, ki je povzročila opustitev sankcij splošnega gospodarskega obsega, kot je že storila v primeru Iraka, in uvedbo bolj ciljno usmerjenih "pametnih" sankcij, povezanih z doseganjem čim večjega učinka na tiste, na katerih vedenje se želi vplivati, pri čemer so čim manjši škodljivi humanitarni učinki ali negativne posledice za ljudi, na katere sankcije niso usmerjene, ali na sosednje države;
Deplores the fact that, owing to a lack of evaluation, it is impossible to assess the effectiveness of targeted measures; recognises, however, the EU's strong humanitarian concern, which has led to the abandonment of sanctions of general economic scope, as previously done in the case of Iraq, and to the imposition of more targeted, "smart" sanctions, geared to achieving the maximum impact on those whose behaviour it wants to influence while minimising adverse humanitarian effects or consequences for persons not targeted or neighbouring countries;
meni, da gospodarske sankcije, ki se uporabljajo ločeno od drugih političnih instrumentov, zelo verjetno ne bodo prisilile režima, proti kateremu so usmerjene, v velike politične spremembe; poleg tega opozarja, da lahko daljnosežne gospodarske omejitve povzročijo previsoke gospodarske in humanitarne stroške, ter zato ponovno poudarja svoj poziv k natančneje oblikovanim in bolj ciljno usmerjenim gospodarskim sankcijam, ki želijo vplivati predvsem na glavne voditelje ciljnih režimov in kršitelje človekovih pravic;
Considers that economic sanctions used in isolation from other policy instruments are extremely unlikely to force a targeted regime to make major policy changes; stresses, moreover, that far-reaching economic restrictions may entail excessively high economic and humanitarian costs, and therefore reiterates its call for more carefully designed and better targeted economic sanctions, designed to have an impact primarily on key leaders of targeted regimes and perpetrators of human rights violations;
poudarja, da bi morale biti vsakršne gospodarske sankcije usmerjene predvsem na tiste sektorje, v katerih je zaposlitvena intenzivnost nizka in imajo omejen pomen za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so pomembna za gospodarski razvoj in prerazporeditev dohodka;
Emphasises that any economic sanctions should first and foremost target those sectors that are not employment-intensive and are of limited relevance for small and medium-sized enterprises, which are important both for economic development and for redistribution of income;
podpira uporabo ciljno usmerjenih finančnih sankcij proti glavnim voditeljem ciljnih režimov in njihovim ožjim družinskim članom, ki delujejo neposredno na dohodek sankcioniranih posameznikov; poudarja, da morajo te sankcije spremljati ustrezni ukrepi proti gospodarskim subjektom EU, ki sodelujejo s takšnimi osebami; poudarja, da predstavljajo ciljno usmerjene blagovne sankcije, katerih cilj je posebni ali glavni vir dohodka nekega režima, tveganje obsežnejših in nerazlikovalnih učinkov na prebivalstvo ter lahko povzročijo razvoj "sive ekonomije";
Supports the use of targeted financial sanctions against key leaders of targeted regimes and their immediate family members, which act directly on the income of the sanctioned individuals; stresses the need for these sanctions to be accompanied by appropriate measures against EU economic operators cooperating with such persons; stresses that targeted commodity sanctions targeting a specific or major source of income of a regime present the risk of more wide-ranging, indiscriminate effects on the population and may favour the development of a "black economy";
meni, da morajo gospodarske in finančne sankcije, tudi če so ciljno usmerjene, izvajati vse fizične in pravne osebe, ki opravljajo gospodarske dejavnosti v EU, vključno z državljani EU ali pravnimi osebami, registriranimi ali ustanovljenimi v skladu z zakonodajo države članice EU, ki opravlja gospodarsko dejavnost izven EU;
Considers that economic and financial sanctions, even when they are targeted, must be applied by all natural and legal persons pursuing commercial activities in the EU, including citizens of third countries, and EU citizens or legal persons registered or established in accordance with the legislation of an EU Member State who pursue commercial activities outside the EU;
poziva k omejeni uporabi "posebnih izjem" v okviru zamrznitve sredstev; poziva k uvedbi posebnega postopka za ugovore v primeru, da želi država članica odobriti izjemo v okviru zamrznitve sredstev, saj pomanjkanja takega postopka ogroža učinkovitost omejevalnega ukrepa glede na to, da morajo države članice le vnaprej obvestiti Komisijo o taki izjemi;
Calls for a limited application of the "extraordinary exemptions" to the freezing of assets; calls for the creation of a specific procedure for objections in the event that a Member State wishes to grant an exemption to the freezing of assets, since the efficiency of the restrictive measure is undermined by the lack of such a procedure given that the Member States are only required to inform the Commission in advance of such an exemption;
poziva k ukrepom za izboljšanje uporabe ciljno usmerjenih finančnih sankcij EU, ki naj zagotovijo, da v praksi ukrepi določenim osebam in subjektom popolnoma preprečijo dostop do vseh finančnih storitev v sodni pristojnosti EU, vključno s tistimi, ki to počnejo prek klirinških hiš ali kako drugače uporabljajo finančne storitve znotraj sodne pristojnosti EU; poudarja, da mora biti v EU in državah članicah distribucija seznamov sankcij vsem subjektom, za katere veljajo obveznosti, določene v Tretji direktivi o pranju denarja Direktiva 2005/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma (UL L 309, 25.11.2005, str.
Calls for action to improve the application of the EU's targeted financial sanctions, in order to ensure that, in practice, the measures comprehensively deny designated persons and entities access to all financial services within the EU's jurisdiction, including those that pass through EU clearing-house banks or otherwise make use of financial services within the EU's jurisdiction; stresses the need for greater flexibility in the distribution of sanction lists within the EU and within Member States to all persons covered by the obligations laid down in the Third Money Laundering Directive Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p.
, prožnejša; predlaga, da vsaka država članica imenuje eno institucijo, odgovorno za razširjanje teh podatkov;
; proposes that each Member State designate one institution responsible for disseminating this information;
poziva k okrepljenemu sodelovanju Sveta in Komisije z vodstvom Družbe za svetovno medbančno finančno telekomunikacijo (SWIFT)in delničarji v Evropi, da se doseže boljše rezultate pri zamrznitvi bančnih računov s črnega seznama in preprečijo prenosi denarja s teh računov ali nanje;
Calls for enhanced cooperation by the Council and the Commission with the SWIFT management and shareholders in Europe, so as to achieve improved results in the freezing of blacklisted accounts and the elimination of money transfers from/to such accounts;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da preučita možnosti in načine, kako konstruktivno uporabiti zamrznjene dohodke ciljnih organov, na primer z dodelitvijo teh sredstev žrtvam kršenja človekovih pravic ali za razvojne namene v okviru poglavja VII Ustanovne listine ZN;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to investigate the possibilities and ways to use frozen income of targeted authorities in a constructive manner, for example by allocating them to victims of human rights violations or for development purposes within the framework of Chapter VII of the UN Charter;
ugotavlja, da so embargi na orožje oblika sankcioniranja, katere namen je ustaviti tok orožja in vojaške opreme na območja sporov ali režimom, ki bi jih verjetno uporabili za notranjo represijo ali nasilje proti tuji državi, kot je določeno v Kodeksu glede izvoza orožja;
Notes that arms embargoes are a form of sanction designed to stop the flow of arms and military equipment to conflict areas or to regimes that are likely to use them for internal repression or aggression against a foreign country as set out in the Code of Conduct on arms exports;
poziva k usklajenemu sodelovanju med državami članicami in Komisijo pri izvajanju embargov EU na orožje, ki jih uporabljajo države članice;
Calls for coordinated cooperation between Member States and the Commission regarding the implementation of EU arms embargoes which are applied by each Member State;
poziva države članice k sprejetju skupnega stališča o izvozu orožja, na podlagi katerega bo sedanji Kodeks glede izvoza orožja pravno zavezujoč;
Calls on the Member States to adopt the common position on arms exports that will make the current Code of Conduct on arms exports legally binding;
poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, naj si še naprej prizadevajo za izboljšave zmogljivosti ZN za spremljanje in izvrševanje, ter podpira stališče, da je treba oblikovati stalno skupino ZN za oceno trgovine s spornim blagom in vrednosti sankcij, povezanih z njim;
Urges the Council, the Commission and Member States to continue to work for improvements in UN monitoring and enforcement capabilities, and supports the view that a permanent UN team should be established to assess trade in conflict commodities and the value of sanctions in relation to them;
opozarja, da predstavljajo omejitve vstopa (prepoved potovanj, prepoved izdaje vizumov) enega od začetnih ukrepov v zaporedju sankcij EU, ki imajo za posledico prepoved osebi ali nedržavnemu subjektu s črnega seznama, da bi se udeleževal uradnih srečanj EU in iz osebnih razlogov potoval v EU;
Recalls that restrictions on admission (travel bans, visa bans) constitute one of the initial steps in the EU's sanctions sequence, entailing the prohibition of blacklisted persons or non-state entities from attending EU official meetings and also from travelling to the EU for private reasons;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da države članice ne upoštevajo v celoti prepovedi izdaje vizumov v okviru EU; poziva države članice, da pri uporabi omejitev potovanja in ustreznih klavzul o izjemah sprejmejo usklajen pristop;
Notes with concern that Member States" adherence to EU visa bans has not been optimal; calls on the Member States to adopt a concerted approach in applying travel restrictions and the relevant exemption clauses;
Spoštovanje človekovih pravic pri uporabi ciljno usmerjenih sankcij v boju proti terorizmu
Respect for human rights in applying targeted sanctions in the fight against terrorism
upošteva dejstvo, da so avtonomne sankcije EU v boju proti terorizmu in izvajanje sankcij Varnostnega sveta ZN v boju proti terorizmu s strani EU predmet več zadev pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti in Sodiščem prve stopnje;
Takes account of the fact that both the autonomous EU anti-terrorist sanctions and the EU implementation of UN Security Council anti-terrorist sanctions are the subject of several cases before the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance;
opozarja, da je obveznost držav članic EU, da pripravijo sankcije v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe EU, ki obvezuje Unijo k spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, kot jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter kot izhajajo iz skupnih ustavnih tradicij držav članic; poudarja, da so obstoječi postopki uvrščanja na črne sezname na ravni EU in ZN z vidika pravne varnosti in pravnih sredstev pomanjkljivi; poziva Svet, naj potegne vse potrebne sklepe in v celoti izvrši sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje glede avtonomnih sankcij EU;
Recalls the obligation of Member States to draft sanctions in compliance with Article 6(2) of the TEU, which requires the Union to respect fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States; stresses that the present blacklisting procedures at both the EU and the UN levels are deficient from the perspective of legal security and legal remedies; urges the Council to draw all the necessary conclusions and to fully apply the judgments of the Court of First Instance as regards EU autonomous sanctions;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da revidirata obstoječe postopke za uvrščanje na črni seznam in umikanje z njega, da se za posameznike in subjekte zagotovi spoštovanje procesnih pravic in bistvenih človekovih pravic ter zlasti mednarodnih standardov o pravici do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva pred neodvisnim in nepristranskim sodiščem in do poštenega postopka, vključno s pravico do seznanjenosti in ustrezne obveščenosti o obtožbah, ki so vložene proti zadevnemu posamezniku ali subjektu, ter o sprejetih odločitvah in pravici do odškodnine za morebitno kršenje človekovih pravic; prav tako poziva države članice EU k spodbujanju takega pregleda v okviru mehanizmov ZN, da se zagotovi spoštovanje temeljnih pravic pri uporabi ciljno usmerjenih sankcij v okviru boja proti terorizmu;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to review the existing procedure for blacklisting and delisting, in order to respect blacklisted individuals" and entities" procedural and substantive human rights and notably international standards as regards the obtaining of an effective remedy before an independent and impartial body and due process, including the right to be notified and adequately informed of the charges brought against the individual or entity in question and of the decisions taken and the right to compensation for any violation of human rights; calls, similarly, on the EU Member States to promote such a review within the UN mechanisms in order to ensure respect for fundamental rights when applying targeted sanctions in the fight against terrorism;
meni, da bo člen 75 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije priložnost, ki jo mora Parlament izkoristiti, da se odpravijo pomanjkljivosti sedanje prakse, kar zadeva uvrstitev imen na črni seznam, ter podpre vse potekajoče parlamentarno delo, ki bo vključeno na dnevni red zakonodajnega programa za leto 2009;
Considers that Article 75 of the TFEU would be an opportunity to be seized by Parliament in order to remedy the shortcomings in current practice as regards the inclusion of names on a blacklist, and supports all the current parliamentary work aimed at being included on the agenda for the 2009 legislative programme;
vendar ponovno poudarja, da je sistem protiterorističnih seznamov, če spoštuje najnovejšo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, učinkovit instrument protiteroristične politike Evropske unije;
Reiterates, however, that the system of anti-terrorist lists, provided that it respects the most recent case-law of the Court of Justice, is an effective instrument of European Union anti-terrorist policy;
poudarja, da terorizem ogroža varnost in svobodo ter zato Svet poziva, naj pregleda in posodobi seznam terorističnih organizacij ob upoštevanju njihovih dejavnosti na vseh celinah;
Stresses that terrorism is a threat to safety and freedom, and therefore urges the Council to review and update the list of terrorist organisations, taking into account their activities on all continents;
ugotavlja, da je EU vedno spodbujala pozitiven pristop k uporabi sankcij z namenom, da se spodbudijo spremembe; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je pomembno dati prednost povezanemu svetovnemu delovanju prek progresivne strategije, ki temelji na pritiskih in spodbudah;
Notes that the EU has always promoted a positive approach to the use of sanctions with a view to encouraging change; stresses, to this end, that it is important to give priority to an integrated global action through a progressive strategy of pressures and incentives;