natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– predhodni zaključki sistema Združenega kraljestva za uporabo podatkov o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih ne dokazujejo uporabnosti množičnega zbiranja in uporabe teh podatkov za boj proti terorizmu (dokazuje pa uporabnost v druge namene, kot tudi uporabo pri posamičnih primerih obravnavanih primerov, z nalogom in upravičenimi ciljem);
– the preliminary conclusions from the UK system for the use of PNR data provides no evidence of the usefulness of the mass collection and use of PNR data for counter terrorism purposes (it does provide evidence of its usefulness for other purposes, as well as the value of using PNR on a case-by-case basis in the context of ongoing investigations, on the basis of a warrant and with due cause);
Omejitev namena
Purpose limitation
poudarja, da načelo omejitve namena predstavlja eno izmed osnovnih načel o varstvu podatkov; zlasti poudarja, da Konvencija št. 108 določa, da se osebni podatki „shranijo za določene in zakonite namene in ne uporabijo na način, ki ni združljiv s temi nameni“ (člen 5. b); ugotavlja tudi, da so izjeme glede tega načela dopustne le, kadar so predpisane z zakonom in predstavljajo potreben ukrep v demokratični družbi, med drugim v interesu „zatiranja kriminala“ (člen 9); poudarja, da je iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice jasno, da gre za sorazmerne, natančne in predvidljive izjeme, in sicer glede na drugi odstavek 8. člena Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah;
Stresses that the principle of purpose limitation is one of the basic principles of data protection; points out, in particular, that Convention 108 states that personal data shall be ‘stored for specified and legitimate purposes and not used in a way incompatible with those purposes’ (Article 5(b)); notes also that derogations to this principle are allowed only insofar as they are provided for by law and constitute a necessary measure in a democratic society in the interests of, inter alia, the ‘suppression of criminal offences’ (Article 9); points out that the case law of the European Court of Human Rights has made clear that these derogations must be proportionate, precise and foreseeable, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights;
obžaluje, da ne obstaja natančna omejitev glede na cilj, kar je osnovno zagotovilo pri izvajanju omejitvenih ukrepov, in meni, da je tovrstno varovanje še pomembnejše pri tajnih nadzornih ukrepih, saj je tveganje samovoljnih dejanj v teh razmerah večje; meni, da je treba nenatančno določene omenjene cilje in opredelitve natančno opredeliti, da bi se izognili pravnim spodrsljajem evropske sheme o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih;
Deplores the lack of precise purpose limitation which is an essential guarantee in the imposition of restrictive measures, and considers that such protection is even more important as regards secret surveillance measures, given the heightened risk of arbitrariness in such circumstances; considers that, as the stated purposes and definitions are imprecise and open-ended, they should be strictly specified to avoid the EU PNR scheme undergoing a legal challenge;
ponovno poudarja, da bi lahko bili podatki iz evropske sheme o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih zelo uporabni in v veliko pomoč pri dodatnih dokazih za posamezne preiskave o znanih terorističnih osumljencih in njihovih sostorilcih; vendar poudarja, da ni dokazov, da bi bili podatki o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih uporabni za množične samodejne raziskave in analize na osnovi meril ali vzorcev tveganja (to je profiliranje ali pridobivanje podatkov) pri iskanju morebitnih teroristov Poročilo CRS za ameriški kongres „Pridobivanje podatkov in državna varnost: Pregled“ – avtor: Jeffrey Seifert; „Učinkovit boj proti terorizmu in omejena vloga prediaktivnega pridobivanja podatkov“ – CATO Institute; „Varovanje zasebnosti posameznikov v boju proti terorizmu: ocena okvirnega programa“; „Brez sanjske vozovnice do varnosti“ – avtor Frank Kuipers, Clingendael Institute, Avgust 2008. ;
Reiterates that PNR data may be very useful as supportive, additional evidence in a specific investigation on known terrorism suspects and associates; points out, however, that there is no evidence that PNR data are useful for massive automated searches and analysis on the basis of risk criteria or patterns (i.e. profiling or data mining) in seeking potential terrorists CRS report for the American Congress 'Data Mining and Homeland Security: An Overview' by Jeffrey Seifert; 'Effective counter-terrorism and the limited role of predicative data mining' by CATO Institute; 'Protecting individual privacy in the struggle against terrorists: a framework for program assessment'; 'No dream ticket to security' by Frank Kuipers, Clingendael Institute, August 2008. ;
nadalje poudarja, da določbe pri varovanju podatkov v Evropi omejujejo profiliranje na temelju osebnih podatkov (člen 8 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah); zato se strinja z mnenjem Agencije za temeljne pravice, da se profiliranje, ki temelji na podatkih o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih, opravlja samo pri obveščanju in da temelji na posameznih primerih in dejanskih merilih;
Stresses, furthermore, that European data protection rules place restrictions on the application of profiling on the basis of personal data (Article 8 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention of Human Rights); concurs, therefore, with the opinion of the Fundamental Rights Agency that profiling based on PNR data should only be intelligence-led, based on individual cases and factual parameters;
ponovno izraža zaskrbljenost glede ukrepov, ki predvidevajo nediskriminatorno uporabo podatkov o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih za profiliranje in opredelitev dejavnikov tveganja; opozarja, da je treba vsako profiliranje na osnovi narodnosti, državljanstva, vere, spolne usmerjenosti, spola, starosti ali zdravstvenega stanja izrecno prepovedati kot neskladno s prepovedjo vse diskriminacije v pogodbah EU in Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
Reiterates its concerns on the measures outlining an indiscriminate use of PNR data for profiling and for the definition of risk assessment parameters; recalls that any kind of profiling based on ethnicity, nationality, religion, sexual orientation, gender, age or medical condition should be explicitly banned as incompatible with the prohibition of any discrimination defined in EU Treaties and in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights;
opozarja, da morata Komisija in Svet v primeru vseh širitev ciljev predloga natančno razjasniti razlog za uporabo podatkov o evidenci podatkov o letalskih potnikih in zakaj obstoječi organi kazenskega pregona ne zadostujejo; meni, da je treba ustvariti zakonodajne temelje za vsak cilj posebej;
Recalls that, in the event of any extension of the proposal's scope, the Commission and the Council should clarify in detail for each stated purpose what use will be made of the PNR data and why existing law enforcement powers are not sufficient; considers that, for each specific purpose, the appropriate legal basis must be established;
poudarja, da je absolutni predpogoj za kakršno koli evropsko shemo za evidenco podatkov o letalskih potnikih sprejetje ustreznega okvira za varstvo podatkov v tretjem stebru, pa tudi posebna pravila za podatke iz te sheme, za katere ne bi veljal evropski okvir varstva podatkov za prvi in tretji steber; poudarja, da je treba pojasniti, kateri predpisi o varstvu podatkov bi veljali za enote za informacije o potnikih, in zagotoviti sledljivost za vse dostopanje, prenašanje in uporabo podatkov iz evidence podatkov o letalskih potnikih;
Stresses that the adoption of an adequate data protection framework under the third pillar is an absolute precondition for any EU PNR scheme, as are specific rules for the transfer and use of PNR data that are not covered by the EU data protection framework for the first and third pillars; stresses the need to clarify what data protection rules apply to Passenger Information Units (PIUs) and to ensure the traceability of all access, transfer and use of PNR data;
poudarja, da se lahko občutljivi podatki uporabijo le pri redni preiskavi ali kazenskem pregonu na podlagi sodnega naloga in za vsak primer posebej; se zaveda zaskrbljenosti letalskih prevoznikov, da občutljivih podatkov ne bo mogoče ločiti od splošnih informacij; zato poziva k opredelitvi strogih pogojev za obdelavo teh podatkov v enotah za informacije o potnikih, kakor je v svojem mnenju zapisala Agencija za temeljne pravice;
Underlines that sensitive data may only be used on a case-by-case basis in the context of a regular investigation or prosecution, obtained with a warrant; notes the concern of airlines that sensitive data cannot be filtered from general remarks; calls, therefore, for the definition of strict conditions for the processing of these data by PIUs, as defined by the Fundamental Rights Agency in its opinion;
Podrobnosti izvedbe
Details of implementation
glede dolžine hranjenja podatkov poudarja, da Komisija ni zadovoljivo utemeljila predlaganega obdobja hrambe; meni pa, da bi morali za oblikovanje kazalnikov tveganja in vzpostavljanje potovalnih in vedenjskih vzorcev zadostovati anonimni podatki; meni tudi, da če se področje uporabe sheme za evidenco podatkov o letalskih potnikih razširi, je treba obdobja hrambe utemeljiti za vsak cilj posebej;
Stresses that, as regards storage periods, the Commission fails to justify the proposed retention period; considers, however, that for the purpose of developing risk indicators and establishing patterns of travel and behaviour, anonymised data should be sufficient; considers also that, if the scope of the PNR scheme is extended, retention periods must be justified for each separate purpose;
ponovno poudarja, da bi morali podatke prenašati zgolj z metodo PUSH in da tretje države ne bodo imele neposrednega dostopa do evidence podatkov o letalskih potnikih v evropskih sistemih za rezervacije;
Reiterates that data transfers should be made using the PUSH method alone and that third countries will not have direct access to PNR in European reservation systems;
glede dostopa do podatkov iz evidence podatkov o letalskih potnikih pozdravlja, da je v predlogu zapisano, da morajo biti vsi subjekti z dostopom do teh podatkov navedeni na podrobnem seznamu;
Welcomes the fact that, as regards access to PNR data, the proposal states that all entities having access to PNR data should be included in an exhaustive list;
glede prenosov v tretje države poudarja, da se podatki ne smejo posredovati v tretje države, razen če zadevne tretje strani (v skladu s konvencijo 108) ne zagotovijo ustrezne ravni varstva (kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi 95/46/ES in pravnih instrumentih za ustanovitev Europola in Eurojusta) ali ustreznih varoval, in da se lahko ti prenosi izvedejo samo za vsak primer posebej;
Stresses, as regards transfers to third countries, that data may not be transferred to third countries unless an adequate level of protection (as specified in Directive 95/46/EC and the legal instruments establishing Europol and Eurojust) or appropriate safeguards are guaranteed by those third parties concerned (in accordance with Convention 108), and that transfers should only be made on a case-by-case basis;
ponovno poudarja, da morajo biti potniki celovito in na dostopen način obveščeni o podrobnostih te sheme in o svojih pravicah ter da so za zagotovitev teh informacij odgovorni organi držav članic; predlaga, naj se za to uporabi zgled informacij o zavrnitvi vkrcanja na letališčih; meni, da je bistveno, da se za potnike opredeli pravica do dostopa, popravka in pritožbe;
Reiterates that passengers must be informed in full and in an accessible manner of the details of the scheme and of their rights, and that the Member State authorities are responsible for providing this information; suggests that the example of the 'denied boarding' information in airports should be used; considers it essential to define a right of access, rectification and appeal for passengers;
poziva, naj se opredelijo natančna in usklajena pravila za zaščito podatkov iz evidenc podatkov o letalskih potnikih, tako glede informacijskotehnoloških rešitev kot glede pravil o pooblastilih in dostopanju;
Requests that detailed and harmonised rules be laid down on the security of PNR data, in terms of both IT solutions and authorisation and access rules.
Posledice za prevoznike
Consequences for carriers
ugotavlja, da letalski prevozniki zbirajo podatke o letalskih potnikih za komercialne namene, ki pa se ne zbirajo sistematično in ne zajemajo vseh področij za tovrstne evidence; vztraja, da se od letalskih družb ne bi smelo zahtevati zbiranje dodatnih podatkov kot tistih, ki jih že zbirajo za svoje komercialne namene; meni, da letalski prevozniki ne bi smeli biti odgovorni za preverjanje, ali so evidence popolne in točne, niti ne bi smelo biti sankcij za nepopolne ali nepravilne podatke; poziva, naj se jasno ovrednotijo stroški, povezani z vzpostavljanjem evropske evidence podatkov o letalskih potnikih: meni, da bi morale dodatne stroške kriti tisti, ki so jih s svojo zahtevo povzročili;
Notes that air carriers collect PNR data for commercial purposes and that data is not systematically collected to complete all PNR fields; insists that airlines should not be required to collect any data additional to those they are collecting for their commercial purposes; considers that air carriers should not be made responsible for verifying whether records are complete and accurate, nor should any sanctions be applied for incomplete or incorrect data; calls for a clear evaluation of the costs involved by an EU PNR; considers that any additional costs should be borne by the requesting parties;.
Posredniki / enote za informacije o potnikih
Intermediaries/ Passenger Information Units (PIUs)
poziva k jasni opredelitvi vloge in pristojnosti enot za informacije o potnikih, zlasti glede preglednosti in demokratične odgovornosti, zato da bi postavili ustrezna pravila za varstvo podatkov; poziva, naj se vloga teh enot omeji na prenos podatkov pristojnim organom, zato da se zagotovi, da bodo ocene tveganja izvajali zgolj pristojni organi in zgolj v okviru preiskave; prosi za pojasnitev, katero pravo bo veljalo za ocene tveganja, ki jih bodo izvajale te enote, in za odgovornost organov za varstvo podatkov, kadar bodo države članice sodelovale in vzpostavile skupne enote za informacije o potnikih;
Calls for a clear definition of the role and powers of the PIUs, in particular in terms of transparency and democratic accountability and in order to set appropriate data protection rules; requests that the role of PIUs be limited to the transfer of data to competent authorities, in order to ensure that risk assessments can only be carried out by competent authorities and in the context of an inquiry; asks for clarification of the law which will govern the risk assessment conducted by the PIU, and the responsibility of data protection authorities in cases where Member States cooperate to set up a joint PIU;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji vladam in parlamentom držav članic, evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov, Agenciji za temeljne pravice ter delovni skupini iz člena 29 in delovni skupini za policijo in pravosodje.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the PlaceNameplaceMemberPlaceType States, the EDPS, the Fundamental Rights Agency and the Article 29 Working Party and Working Party on Police and Justice.
o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Državo Izrael na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Države Izrael v programih Skupnosti
on the conclusion of a protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their PlaceNameplaceMemberPlaceType States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, on a framework Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on the general principles governing the State of Israel's participation in Community programmes
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Državo Izrael na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Države Izrael v programih Skupnosti
European Parliament resolution on the conclusion of a protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, on a framework Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on the general principles governing the State of Israel's participation in Community programmes
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 2000 o sklenitvi Evro-mediteranskega sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in državo Izrael na drugi strani (2000/384/ES, ESPJ),
having regard to the decision of the Council and the Commission of 19 April 2000 on the conclusion of a Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part and the State of Israel, of the other part (2000/384/EC, ECSC),
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-mediteranskemu sporazumu o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Državo Izrael na drugi strani, o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Države Izrael v programih Skupnosti (dokument Sveta 5471/08),
having regard to the Council decision on the conclusion of a protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part, on a Framework Agreement between the European Community and the State of Israel on the general principles governing the State of Israel’s participation in Community programmes (Council document 5471/08),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2002 o Bližnjem vzhodu Sprejeta besedila , P5-TA(2002)0173 in UL C 127E, 29.5.2003, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2002 on the Middle East Texts Adopted , P5-TA(2002)0173 and OJ C 127E, 29.5.2003, p.
584. , v kateri je Izrael pozval k polnemu spoštovanju človekovih pravic, s čimer bi prispeval k pravilnemu delovanju pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropskima skupnostma in Izraelom,
584. , which called for full observance of human rights by Israel for the proper functioning of the Association Agreement between the European Communities and Israel,
ob upoštevanju izjave Evropske unije po osmem srečanju pridružitvenega sveta EU-Izrael 16. junija 2008,
having regard to the European Union statement following the Eighth Meeting of the EU-Israel Association Council of 16 June 2008,
ob upoštevanju priporočila št. 1/2005 pridružitvenega sveta EU-Izrael s 26. aprila 2005 o izvajanju akcijskega načrta EU-Izrael,
having regard to Recommendation No 1/2005 of the EU-Israel Association Council of 26 April 2005 on the implementation of the EU-Israel Action Plan,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1638/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o splošnih določbah o ustanovitvi Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva,
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 of the European Parliament and the Council of 24 October 2006 laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o splošnem pristopu, s katerim se partnerskim državam Evropske sosedske politike omogoči sodelovanje v agencijah Skupnosti ter v programih Skupnosti (KOM(2006) 724),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and to the European Parliament on the general approach to enable ENP partner countries to participate in Community agencies and Community programmes (COM(2006) 724),
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1639/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006, ki vzpostavlja Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije (2007–2013) UL L 310, 09.11.06, str.
having regard to Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013) OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o okvirnih raziskovalnih programih in resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2007 Sprejeta besedila , P6-TA(2007)0390 . o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o znanstvenem in tehničnem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Državo Izrael (KOM(2007)0276 – C6-0237/2007 – 2007/0096(CNS)),
having regard to its resolutions on the research framework programmes and its resolution of 25 September 2007 Texts Adopted , P6-TA(2007)0390 . on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement on Scientific and Technical Cooperation between the European Community and the State of Israel (COM(2007)0276 - C6-0237/2007 - 2007/0096(CNS)),
ob upoštevanju evro-sredozemskega pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Palestinsko osvobodilno organizacijo (PLO) UL L 187, 16.07.97, str.
having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Interim Association Agreement between the European Community and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) OJ L 187, 16.7.1997, p.
ker sta se EU in Izrael v pridružitvenem sporazumu zavezala k oblikovanju ustreznega okvira za politični dialog in vzpostavitev tesnega partnerstva na številnih področjih, med drugim gospodarskem, znanstvenem, tehnološkem, avdiovizualnem in kulturnem;
whereas, in the Association Agreement, the EU and Israel committed themselves to creating an appropriate framework for political dialogue and to establishing a close partnership in various fields, including economic, scientific, technological, audiovisual and cultural cooperation,
ker želi evropska sosedska politika utrditi blaginjo, stabilnost in varnost, razviti tesne stike s sosednjimi državami EU in med njimi ter te države zavezati k izvajanju reform za demokracijo, ki bo temeljila na spoštovanju človekovih pravic, pravni državi, dobrem upravljanju ter trajnostnemu gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju; ker je bil Izrael prva partnerska država evropske sosedske politike, s katero je bil dosežen dogovor o akcijskem načrtu,
whereas the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) aims to consolidate a ring of prosperity, stability and security, to develop close ties with and between the EU's neighbouring countries, and to commit them to pursue reforms towards democracy based on respect for human rights, the rule of law, better governance and sustainable economic and social development; whereas Israel was the first ENP partner country to agree on an Action Plan,
ker je cilj evropske sosedske politike tudi ponuditi okvir za razvoj dobrih sosedskih odnosov med sosednimi državami, da bi premagale pretekle razlike in napetosti in prispevale k celovitemu reševanju še vedno odprtih konfliktov; ker je resnični razvoj evropske sosedske politike mogoč le, če bo prišlo do napredka pri reševanju sedanjih konfliktov,
whereas the European Neighbourhood Policy aims also at providing a framework for developing good-neighbourly relations between bordering countries with a view to overcoming past differences and tensions and facilitating a comprehensive settlement of the ongoing conflicts; whereas a genuine development of the European Neighbourhood Policy can only be possible if progress is made in the resolution of the existing conflicts,