natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na splošno mora veljati: krajši ko so roki, učinkoviteje delujejo ukrepi.
The general rule which should apply is that the shorter time limits are, the more effective the measures in question will be.
Dokler protidampinški ali protisubvencijski postopek še poteka, niti uvozniki niti izvozniki ne vedo, pod kakšnimi pogoji bodo lahko trgovali v bližnji prihodnosti.
So long as an anti-dumping or anti-subsidy procedure is pending, neither importers nor exporters know under what conditions they will be able to operate in the near future.
Zato se upravičeno zavzemajo za hitre in predvidljive postopke.
They are therefore, rightly, interested in rapid, predictable procedures.
Ukinitev dosedanjega posvetovalnega postopka je omogočila dodatno racionalizacijo postopkov.
The abolition of the consultation procedures which have existed hitherto renders a further streamlining of procedures possible.
Podaljšanje rokov na 18 mesecev ni potrebno.
There is no need to extend them to 18 months.
Če pa bi v celoti izkoristili vse roke postopka pregleda in pritožbenega postopka, bi prišlo do časovne zagate.
Only if all the time limits for the examination and appeal procedures were to be exploited to the full would a time problem arise.
To bi se lahko zgodilo, če se pri postopku pregleda ne bi sprejela končna odločitev in bi bilo treba zato uporabiti pritožbeni postopek.
Specifically, this would be the case if during the examination procedure no final decision were arrived at and therefore the appeal committee had to be asked for a decision.
Podvajanje postopkov odborov (postopek pregleda in pritožbeni postopek) z negotovim izidom bi povzročilo, da roka ne bi bilo mogoče spoštovati.
The ‘duplication’ of committee procedures (examination procedure plus appeal procedure), with an uncertain result in prospect, would make it impossible to comply with the time limit.
Zato je v poročilu samo za tak primer predvidena izjemna možnost podaljšanja roka.
The report therefore allows the time limit to be extended in this special case, and only in this case.
Natančneje so v poročilu predvidene naslednje spremembe:
The report therefore contains the following amendments:
· ukinitev posvetovalnega postopka omogoča skrajšanje standardnih postopkov na 14 mesecev pri protidampinških primerih in na 12 mesecev pri protisubvencijskih primerih;
· The abolition of the consultation procedures makes it possible to reduce the regulatory procedure to 14 months in anti-dumping cases and 12 months in anti-subsidy cases.
· če je po neuspešnem poteku postopka pregleda potrebna odločitev pritožbenega odbora, mora obstajati možnost podaljšanja roka na 15 mesecev za protidampinške primere in na 13 mesecev za protisubvencijske primere, saj sicer rokov ne bi bilo mogoče spoštovati;
· If, after the examination procedure has been completed without result, a decision is needed from the appeal committee, it must be possible to extend the time limit to 15 months in anti-dumping cases and 13 months in anti-subsidy cases, because otherwise it would be impossible to comply with the time limits.
V poročilu je zato – namenoma za razliko od Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011, kjer ta problematika ni zadovoljivo rešena – predvideno najdaljše dovoljeno trajanje enega meseca za vse tri vrste postopkov, poleg tega pa je določen tudi rok za oddajo predlogov sprememb.
The report therefore provides for a maximum time limit of one month for all three types of procedure – deliberately departing from the provisions of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011, which does not resolve this problem satisfactorily – and in addition sets a time limit for amendments.
Morebitne predloge sprememb je treba vložiti tri dni pred srečanjem posameznih odborov.
Any amendments must be suggested, at the latest, three days before the meeting of the relevant committee.
Za večino obravnavanih uredb se v poročilu priporoča uvedba obveznosti Komisije, da poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in javnosti.
In most of the regulations in question, the report recommends requiring the Commission to report to the European Parliament and to the public.
Vse informacije, ki niso zaupne, je treba zbrati in objaviti v letnih oz. dveletnih poročilih.
All information which is not confidential must be set out in an annual or biennial report and published.
To je potrebno tudi zato, da se Parlament in javnost seznanita s tistimi poročili, ki jima zaradi sprejetja izvedbenih določb niso bila neposredno na voljo, in da se omogoči ustrezna kontrola v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011.
This is necessary in order to supply information about fields which have been placed beyond the immediate reach of the European Parliament and hence of the public by adopting implementing provisions, thus facilitating scrutiny in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Poročevalka je predložila poročilo, ki temelji na spremembah Lizbonske pogodbe in sprejetju Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 ter jih sistematično prenaša v sekundarno zakonodajo, ki ureja skupno trgovinsko politiko.
The rapporteur is tabling a report which is based on the changes brought about by the Lisbon Treaty and by the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 and which systematically incorporates those changes into the secondary law of the common commercial policy.
V poročilu je natančno pojasnjen predlog Komisije glede na bistvo vseh 26 uredb.
The report fleshes out the provisions of the Commission proposal in relation to the substance of all 26 regulations.
Ocenjuje, ali je boljša uporaba delegiranih aktov ali izvedbenih določb, ter primerja uporabo svetovalnega postopka in postopka pregleda.
It weighs up the pros and cons of using delegated acts and implementing provisions and compares the advisory and examination procedures.
Rezultat je uravnoteženo razmerje med različnimi pravnimi instrumenti, pri katerem se upoštevajo materialni in pravno-politični interesi vseh sodelujočih, dosedanja zakonodaja, sprejeta od 1. decembra 2009, kot tudi institucionalni interesi treh evropskih institucij.
The result is a balanced relationship among the various legal instruments which takes into account the substantive and legal interests of all parties concerned, the legislation which has been in force since 1 December 2009 and the institutional interests of the three European Institutions.
o ženskah pri sprejemanju političnih odločitev – kakovost in enakost
on women in political decision-making – quality and equality
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti členov 2 in 3(3) Pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular Articles 2 and 3(3) thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenih členov 21 in 23,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Articles 21 and 23 thereof,
– upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah iz leta 1948,
– having regard to the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju dogovorjenih sklepov Komisije za položaj žensk iz leta 2006 o „enaki udeležbi žensk in moških v procesu odločanja na vseh ravneh“,
– having regard to the Agreed Conclusions of the Commission on the Status of Women of 2006 on ‘Equal participation of women and men in decision-making processes at all levels’,
– ob upoštevanju dogovorjenih sklepov Komisije za položaj žensk 1997/2 o „ključnih področjih, ki jih zadevajo pekinška izhodišča za ukrepanje 1996–1999“,
– having regard to the Commission on the Status of Women Agreed Conclusions 1997/2 on the Critical Areas of Concern of the Beijing Platform for Action 1996-1999,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije A/RES/58/142 generalne skupščine Združenih narodov o ženskah in njihovem političnem udejstvovanju,
– having regard to UN General Assembly Resolution A/RES/58/142 on women and political participation,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Strategija za enakost žensk in moških 2010–2015“ ( COM(2010)0491 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015’ ( COM(2010)0491 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Komisije z dne 19. junija 2000 o uravnoteženi zastopanosti obeh spolov v odborih in strokovnih skupinah, ki jih ustanovi Komisija
– having regard to the Commission Decision of 19 June 2000 relating to gender balance within the committees and expert groups established by it
UL L 154, 27.6.2000, str.
OJ L 154, 27.6.2000, p.34. ,
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila Odbora ministrov Sveta Evrope Rec (2003)3 za uravnoteženo udeležbo žensk in moških v političnem in javnem odločanju, sprejetega dne 12. marca 2003, in rezultatov dveh krogov spremljanja napredka pri izvajanju tega priporočila na podlagi vprašalnika o udeležbi žensk in moških v političnem in javnem odločanju po spolu, ki sta bila zaključena leta 2005 in 2008,
– having regard to the Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe Rec (2003)3 on balanced participation of women and men in political and public decision-making, adopted on 12 March 2003, and the results of the two rounds of monitoring of the progress made in the implementation of this Recommendation Rec (2003)3, based on a questionnaire on gender-segregated data on the participation of women and men in political and public decision-making, completed in 2005 and 2008 respectively,
– ob upoštevanju Resolucije 1079(1996) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope o večji zastopanosti žensk v parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope, Priporočila 1413(1999) o enaki zastopanosti v političnem življenju, Resolucije 1348(2003) o uravnoteženi zastopanosti obeh spolov v parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope, Priporočila 1665(2004) o udeležbi žensk na volitvah in Resolucije 303(2010) o doseganju trajnostne enakosti med spoloma v lokalnem in regionalnem političnem življenju,
– having regard to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Resolution (PACE) 1079 (1996), on the increased representation of women in the PACE, Recommendation 1413 (1999) on equal representation in political life, Resolution 1348 (2003) on gender-balanced representation in the PACE, Recommendation 1665 (2004), on women’s participation in elections and Resolution 303 (2010) on achieving sustainable gender equality in local and regional political life,
– ob upoštevanju Resolucije 85(1999) Kongresa lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti Sveta Evrope, Priporočila 68(1999) o udeležbi žensk v političnem življenju v regijah Evrope ter Priporočila 111(2002) o individualnih volilnih pravicah in demokratičnih zahtevah žensk,
– having regard to the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Resolution 85 (1999), Recommendation 68 (1999) on women’s participation in political life in the regions of Europe and Recommendation 111 (2002) on women's individual voting rights and democratic requirements,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije o udeležbi žensk na volitvah, ki jo je sprejela Evropska komisija za demokracijo skozi pravo (t.i. beneška komisija),
– having regard to the Declaration on Women’s participation in elections adopted by the European Commission for Democracy through Law (‘Venice Commission’),
– ob upoštevanju priročnika o praktičnem izvajanju načela enakosti spolov pri pripravi proračuna, ki ga je pripravil Generalni direktorat za človekove pravice in pravne zadeve Sveta Evrope (april 2009),
– having regard to the handbook ‘Gender budgeting: practical implementation’ prepared by the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs of the Council of Europe (April 2009),
– ob upoštevanju Priporočila 1899(2010) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope o povečanju zastopanosti žensk v politiki prek volilnega sistema, sprejetega dne 27. januarja 2010,
– having regard to Recommendation 1899(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on increasing women’s representation in politics through the electoral system, adopted on 27 January 2010,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. marca 2000 o ženskah na vodilnih položajih
– having regard to its resolution of 2 March 2000 on women in decision-making
UL C 346, 4.12.2000, str.
OJ C 346, 4.12.2000, p.82. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0029/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0029/2012 ),
A. ker so ženske in moški neenakomerno udeleženi v političnem in javnem odločanju ter so ženske občutno premalo zastopane na voljenih in imenovanih političnih položajih na ravni Evropske unije in njenih držav članic; ker zastopanost žensk na vmesnih volitvah v Evropskem parlamentu zaskrbljujoče nizka;
A. whereas there is an imbalance in participation by women and men in political and public decision-making and clear under-representation of women in elected and nominated political positions at the level of the European Union and in its Member States; whereas there is an alarming under-representation of women in the mid-term elections within the European Parliament;
B. ker se udeležba žensk v političnem odločanju ter metode, strategije in kulturna nagnjenja in orodja za odpravo razlik na nacionalni ravni v EU in med državami članicami, političnimi strankami in socialnimi partnerji močno razlikujejo; Ab.
B. whereas the participation of women in political decision-making and the methods, strategies and cultural attitudes and tools to combat discrepancies vary greatly at national level within the EU and among its Member States, political parties and social partners;
C. ker je zastopanost žensk v Evropskem parlamentu narasla na 35 %, vendar pa ženske še vedno niso enako zastopane kot moški; ker je zastopanost žensk na vodilnih položajih v odborih in političnih skupinah še nižja; ker zastopanost žensk v Evropski komisiji stagnira pri eni tretjini članov in ker Komisiji še nikoli ni predsedovala ženska;
C. whereas women’s representation in the European Parliament has increased to 35% but has not yet reached parity; whereas women are even more under-represented in leading positions in committees and political groups; whereas the representation of women in the European Commission is stagnating at one third, and the Commission has never been chaired by a woman;
D. ker statistike kažejo, da kljub številnim izvedenim ukrepom prevladuje neenakost in je zastopanost žensk pri političnem odločanju v zadnjih letih ostala enaka, namesto da bi se linearno povečevala, pri čemer je razmerje med spoloma v nacionalnih parlamentih v EU nespremenjeno – 24 % žensk in 76 % moških – in je med ministri skupno le 23 % žensk
D. whereas, according to statistics and despite the numerous actions undertaken, an absence of parity prevails, and women’s representation in political decision-making has stagnated in recent years instead of displaying linear improvement, the gender balance in national parliaments across the EU remaining unchanged at 24 % women and 76 % men, with women accounting for only 23 % of ministers overall
Glej zbirko podatkov Evropske komisije o ženskah in moških pri odločanju, ki je posodobljena vsako četrtletje. ;
See the quarterly update of the European Commission’s database on women and men in decision-making. ;
E. ker se danes dejansko uporablja neformalni sistem kvot, v katerem imajo moški prednost pred ženskami in moški na odločilne položaje izbirajo moške, kas sicer ni formaliziran sistem, je pa sistematična in zelo resnična globoko zakoreninjena kultura pozitivne obravnave moških;
E. whereas today an informal system of quotas is de facto in play, where men are privileged over women and where men choose men for decision-making positions, which is not a formalised system but nevertheless a systematic and very real deep-rooted culture of positive treatment of men;
F. ker je enaka zastopanost žensk in moških pri političnem odločanju vprašanje človekovih pravic in družbene pravičnosti ter bistvena zahteva za delovanje demokratične družbe; ker je vztrajno prenizka zastopanost žensk demokratični primanjkljaj, ki spodkopava legitimnost odločanja na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni;
F. whereas equal representation of women and men in political decision-making is a matter of human rights and social justice and a vital requirement for the functioning of a democratic society; whereas the persistent under-representation of women is a democratic deficit that undermines the legitimacy of decision-making at both EU and national level;
G. ker proces odločanja temelji na pripravah na upravni ravni in je zato število žensk na upravnih položajih, zlasti na vodstvenih, vprašanje enakosti ter zagotavlja, da so pri pripravi vseh politik upoštevani vidiki, povezani s spolom;
G. whereas decision-making is based on administrative preparations and thus the number of women in administrative positions, especially in leadership, is a matter of equality and ensures that gender aspects are taken into account in the preparation of all policies;
H. ker so evropske volitve, ki bodo potekale leta 2014, in potem imenovanje naslednje Evropske komisije in imenovanje kandidatov na „vodilna delovna mesta“ EU priložnost za napredek v smeri demokracije enakosti na ravni EU in priložnost, da EU postavi zgled na tem področju;
H. whereas the European elections to be held in 2014, followed by the appointment of the next European Commission and the nominations for the EU ‘Top Jobs’, is a chance to move toward parity-based democracy at the EU level and for the EU to be a role model in this area;
I. ker Konvencija ZN o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk med drugim določa, da bi morale države podpisnice sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo diskriminacije žensk v političnem in javnem življenju;
I. whereas the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women states, inter alia, that State parties should take all appropriate measures, including positive measures, to eliminate discrimination against women in political and public life;
J. ker parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope spodbuja:
J. whereas the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe encourages:
– reforme volilnih sistemov, da bodo bolj naklonjeni zastopanosti žensk;
- reforms in electoral systems to make them more favourable to women’s representation;
– določbe o prepovedi diskriminacije na podlagi spola v ustavah in volilni zakonodaji, pri čemer je treba dovoliti izjemo, tj. ukrepe pozitivne diskriminacije v korist premalo zastopanega spola;
- gender-based anti-discrimination provisions in constitutions and electoral laws, with the necessary exception of allowing positive discrimination measures for the under-represented sex;
– državljansko vzgojo, ki se posveča vprašanju spolov, in odpravo stereotipov o spolih in „vgrajenih“ predsodkov do kandidatk, zlasti v političnih strankah, pa tudi v medijih;
- gender-sensitive civic education and elimination of gender stereotypes and ‘built-in’ bias against women candidates, especially within political parties but also in the media;
K. ker pekinška deklaracija in izhodišča za ukrepanje na področju žensk na vodilnih položajih in sprejemanja odločitev poudarjajo, da je enaka zastopanost nujni pogoj za upoštevanje interesov žensk ter je potrebna za krepitev in pravilno delovanje demokracije; ker potrjujejo tudi, da je aktivno udejstvovanje žensk pod enakimi pogoji, kot veljajo za moške, na vseh ravneh odločanja ključno za doseganje enakopravnosti, trajnostnega razvoja, miru in demokracije;
K. whereas the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action on women in power and decision-making underlines the fact that equal participation is a necessary condition for women’s interests to be taken into account and is needed in order to strengthen democracy and promote its proper functioning; whereas it reaffirms also that the active participation of women, on equal terms with men, at all levels of decision-making is essential to the achievement of equality, sustainable development, peace and democracy;
L. ker se zaradi vztrajnih stereotipov o spolih nadaljuje razlikovanje med ključnimi vodilnimi političnimi položaji, pri čimer so oskrbovalne in distributivne naloge, kot so zdravstvo, socialno varstvo ter okolje, zaupane ženskam, moškim pa so dodeljene naloge moči, povezane z rabo virov, kot so gospodarske in denarne zadeve, trgovina, proračun, obrambne in zunanje zadeve, kar izkrivlja strukturo moči in dodeljevanje virov;
L. whereas owing to persisting gender stereotypes there is still a severe segregation in key political decision-making positions, with care and distributive tasks such as health, social welfare and the environment being entrusted more to women, while men are assigned powerful, resource-related tasks such as economic and monetary affairs, trade, budget, defence and foreign affairs, which distorts the power structure and resource allocation;
M. ker imajo politične stranke, ki so odgovorne za izbiro, razvrščanje in imenovanje kandidatov za vodilne položaje, zares ključno vlogo pri zagotavljanju enake zastopanosti žensk in moških v politiki ter bi morale torej podpirati primere dobre prakse, kot so prostovoljne strankarske kvote na volitvah, ki so jih že uvedle nekatere politične stranke v 13 državah članicah EU;
M. whereas political parties, which bear responsibility for selecting, ranking and nominating candidates for leading positions, have a central role in guaranteeing the equal representation of women and men in politics and should therefore endorse good practices such as voluntary party quotas for elections, which have already been introduced by some political parties in 13 EU Member States;
N. ker je Svetovna banka v študiji iz leta 2008 o „korupciji in ženskah v vladi“ ugotovila, da je v vladah z večjim številom žensk manj korupcije, ker ženske v skladu z ugotovitvami te študije spoštujejo višje etične standarde in se bolj zavzemajo za „skupno dobro“;
N. whereas the World Bank’s 2008 study on ‘Corruption and Women in Government’ concludes that lower levels of government corruption are found where there are higher levels of female participation, because, according to the findings of this research, women have higher ethical behaviour standards and show themselves to be more concerned with the ‘common good’;
O. ker so potrebne celovite večplastne strategije, ki vključujejo nezavezujoče ukrepe, kot so cilji in prostovoljne strankarske kvote, pomožne ukrepe, kot so izobraževanje o enakosti spolov, mentorstvo in kampanje za ozaveščanje, ter pravno zavezujoče ukrepe, kot so volilne kvote po spolu, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da so se za najučinkovitejše pri doseganju uravnotežene zastopanosti spolov v politiki izkazali pravno zavezujoči ukrepi, ki so skladni z institucionalnim in volilnim sistemom ter vključujejo pravila za razvrščanje, spremljanje in učinkovite sankcije v primeru neupoštevanja;
O. whereas comprehensive multifaceted strategies are needed, consisting of non-binding measures such as targets and voluntary party quotas, enabling measures such as gender education, mentoring and awareness-raising campaigns and legally binding measures such as electoral gender quotas, bearing in mind that legally binding measures, which are compatible with the institutional and electoral system and which entail rank-order rules, monitoring and effective sanctions for non-compliance, have proved most effective in achieving gender balance in politics;
P. ker je dostop žensk do financiranja volilnih kampanj pogosto bolj omejen zaradi diskriminacije znotraj političnih strank, izključenosti žensk iz mrež z denarjem ter nižjih prihodkov in prihrankov žensk;
P. whereas women’s access to electoral campaign funding is often more restricted, owing to discrimination within political parties, women’s exclusion from moneyed networks and their lower income and savings;
Q. ker imajo postopki v volilnih sistemih, političnih institucijah in političnih strankah odločilno vlogo in pogosto velik vpliv na učinkovitost strategij, ki se uporabljajo, in na raven uravnotežene zastopanosti spolov v politiki;
Q. whereas procedures in electoral systems, political institutions and political parties play a decisive role and have a serious impact on the effectiveness of strategies applied and on the extent to which gender balance is achieved in politics;