natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj Komisiji in Svetu o omejevalnih ukrepih z dne 16. novembra 2009 (O 0135/2009 – B7-0233/2009 , O 0136/2009 – B7-0234/2009 ),
– having regard to the questions of 16 November 2009 to the Commission and to the Council on restrictive measures ( O‑0135/2009 – B7-0233/2009 , O‑0136/2009 – B7-0234/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju stališča, ki ga je na svoji seji 3. decembra 2009 Odbor za pravne zadeve izrazil glede pravne podlage v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo za predloge o besedilih o Osami bin Ladnu, mreži Al Kajda in talibanih ter Zimbabveju in Somaliji,
– having regard to the views expressed by its Committee on Legal Affairs at its meeting on 3 December 2009 on the legal bases for the proposals concerning the texts on Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, Somalia and Zimbabwe under the Treaty of Lisbon,
A. ker je spoštovanje človekovih pravic ena temeljnih vrednot Unije (člen 2 PEU), kar se odraža tudi v njenem zunanjem delovanju, saj v skladu s členom 21(1) PEU „Unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni vodijo načela, ki so bila podlaga njenega nastanka, razvoja in širitve in ki jih želi s svojim delovanjem tudi spodbujati v svetu: demokracija, pravna država, univerzalnost in nedeljivost človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, enakost in solidarnost ter spoštovanje načel Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov in mednarodnega prava”,
A. whereas respect for human rights is one of the founding values of the Union (Article 2 TEU) which is also reflected in its external action, Article 21(1) TEU stipulating that its ‘action on the international scene shall be guided by the principles which have inspired its own creation, development and enlargement, and which it seeks to advance in the wider world: democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law’,
B. ker je Evropska unija zavezana boju proti terorizmu v vseh njegovih razsežnostih, najsi izvira ali deluje znotraj ali zunaj njenih meja, pri čemer Unija z različnimi instrumenti in sredstvi deluje v mejah, ki so opredeljene z vladavino prava in spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic; ker si je treba še posebej prizadevati, da bo zagotovljeno, da se na tem področju temeljne pravice v celoti spoštujejo in da so vsi ukrepi, sprejeti za boj proti terorizmu, sorazmerni, primerni in učinkoviti;
B. whereas the Union is committed to the fight against terrorism in all its dimensions – whether its origin lies, or its activities occur, inside or beyond EU borders – while acting, through different instruments and means within the clear limits defined by the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; whereas extreme care must be taken to ensure that in this particular field fundamental rights are fully respected and that all the measures adopted with a view to the fight against terrorism are proportionate, appropriate and effective,
C. ker sredstva, s katerimi želi Unija doseči zgoraj navedene cilje, med njimi boj proti terorizmu, vključujejo omejevalne ukrepe (sankcije) (čeprav se ne omejujejo le nanje) proti pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom; ker se še naprej porajajo vprašanja, ali so Združeni narodi in EU v zadostni meri dokazali, da se s temi ukrepi uspešno omejuje financiranje terorističnih dejanj, ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da imajo ukrepi velik vpliv na verodostojnost EU in Združenih narodov ter njuni zavezanosti temeljnim pravicam,
C. whereas the means by which the Union aims to achieve the objectives highlighted above, among them the fight against terrorism, include (but are not limited to) restrictive measures (sanctions) against the governments of third States, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities; whereas questions are still being asked as to what extent the UN and the EU have produced sufficient evidence of the success of such measures in restricting the financing of acts of terrorism; and having regard to the significant impact the measures have had on the credibility of the EU's and UN’s commitment to fundamental rights,
D. ker se v skladu s splošno prakso EU tukaj brez razlikovanja uporabljata izraza „sankcije” in „omejevalni ukrepi” Vrste omejevalnih ukrepov se razlikujejo in vključujejo embargo na orožje, trgovinske sankcije, finančne/gospodarske sankcije, zamrznitev sredstev, prepoved poletov, omejevanje vstopa, diplomatske sankcije, bojkotiranje športnih in kulturnih dogodkov ter prekinitev sodelovanja s tretjo državo.
D. whereas, in line with general EU practice, no distinction is being made here between the terms ‘sanctions’ and ‘restrictive measures’ The types of restrictive measures vary and include arms embargoes, trade sanctions, financial/economic sanctions, freezing of assets, flight bans, restriction on admission, diplomatic sanctions, boycotts of sports and cultural events, and suspension of cooperation with a third country.
; ker je Svet opozoril, da bi morale biti sankcije usmerjene tako, da imajo čim večje posledice za tiste, na katerih ravnanje se želi vplivati; pri tem bi morala natančna usmeritev na najmanjši možni obseg skrčiti vsak negativen humanitarni učinek, tveganje nenamernih posledic za osebe, ki niso tarče ukrepov, in možne negativne učinke na sosednje države,
; whereas the Council has pointed out that sanctions should be targeted in such a way as to have maximum impact on those whose behaviour they are intended to influence; in doing so, accurate targeting should reduce to the absolute minimum any adverse humanitarian effects, the risk of unintended consequences for persons not targeted or possible adverse effects on neighbouring countries,
E. ker člen 215(2) PDEU določa, da "kadar sklep, sprejet v skladu s poglavjem 2 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, tako predvideva, lahko Svet po postopku iz odstavka 1 sprejme omejevalne ukrepe proti fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom"; in ker prvi odstavek člena 75 PDEU določa, da „če je to potrebno za doseganje ciljev iz člena 67, zlasti kar zadeva preprečevanje terorizma in z njim povezanih dejavnosti ter boj proti njim, Evropski parlament in Svet z uredbami, sprejetimi po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, določita okvir upravnih ukrepov glede pretoka kapitala in plačil, kot so zamrznitev sredstev, finančnega premoženja ali ekonomskih dobičkov, ki pripadajo fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom ali so v njihovi posesti ali imetništvu”,
E. whereas Article 215(2) TFEU provides that 'where a decision adopted in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union so provides, the Council may adopt restrictive measures under the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 against natural or legal persons and groups or non-State entities'; and whereas Article 75, first paragraph, TFEU provides that 'where necessary to achieve the objectives set out in Article 67, as regards preventing and combating terrorism and related activities, the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall define a framework for administrative measures with regard to capital movements and payments, such as the freezing of funds, financial assets or economic gains belonging to, or owned or held by, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities',
F. ker drugi pododstavek člena 275 PDEU določa tudi, da „je Sodišče pristojno [...] za odločanje o tožbah, vloženih v skladu s pogoji četrtega pododstavka člena 263 te pogodbe, v katerih se nadzira zakonitost sklepov, ki predvidevajo omejevalne ukrepe proti fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, ki jih je Svet sprejel na podlagi poglavja 2 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji”,
F. whereas Article 275, second subparagraph, TFEU also prescribes that 'the Court shall have jurisdiction [...] to rule on proceedings, brought in accordance with the conditions laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 263 of this Treaty, reviewing the legality of decisions providing for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons adopted by the Council on the basis of Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union',
G. ker sta v členu 16(2) PDEU Evropski parlament in Svet pozvana, da vzpostavita jasen in stabilen okvir za varstvo osebnih podatkov s pravili „o varstvu fizičnih oseb pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije ter držav članic v okviru dejavnosti s področja uporabe prava Unije in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov”; ker isti člen določa, da „upoštevanje teh pravil nadzirajo neodvisni organi”; ker se razume, da bi omenjena pravila veljala tudi pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani institucij Unije na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike; ker je treba člen 39 PEU (v poglavju 2 z naslovom Posebne določbe o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki) razumeti kot odstopanje od člena 16 PDEU, ki določa, da „Svet sprejme sklep o določitvi pravil o varstvu fizičnih oseb, ko države članice obdelujejo osebne podatke pri opravljanju dejavnosti s področja uporabe tega poglavja, in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov”; ker enako kot člen 16(2) PDEU določa, da „upoštevanje teh pravil nadzirajo neodvisni organi“;
G. whereas Article 16(2) TFEU calls on Parliament and the Council to establish a clear and stable framework for data protection with rules 'relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of Union law, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data'; whereas the same Article states that 'compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities'; whereas the implication is that the above-mentioned rules would apply also to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions in the area of the common foreign and security policy; whereas Article 39 TEU (in Chapter 2 which is entitled 'Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy') must be read as a derogation from Article 16 TFEU which requires that the 'Council shall adopt a decision laying down the rules relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of this Chapter, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data'; whereas, in the same way as Article 16(2) TFEU, it prescribes that 'compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities',
H. ker je v omenjeni zadevi Kadi in Al Barakaat International Foundation proti Svetu in Komisiji Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razveljavilo Uredbo (ES) št. 881/2002, kar zadeva Jasina Abdulaha Kadija in družbo Al Barakaat International Foundation, in je izrazilo mnenje, da mora organ Skupnosti, ki odloči o zamrznitvi sredstev in ekonomskih virov posameznika ali subjekta v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 881/2002, posamezniku ali subjektu, ki ga ukrep zadeva, sporočiti, na kateri podlagi temelji odločitev, da se na ta način spoštuje pravica do obrambe, zlasti pravica do zaslišanja in pravica do sodnega pregleda odločitve; glede na to, da te osebe ali subjekti niso bili obveščeni o dokazih, ki so bili zbrani proti njim, niso mogli v zadovoljivih pogojih braniti svojih pravic pred sodstvom Skupnosti,
H. whereas in the above-mentioned case of Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission , the Court of Justice annulled Regulation (EC) No 881/2002, in so far as it concerned Mr Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation, and considered that the Community authority deciding to freeze the funds and economic resources of an individual or entity in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 must communicate the grounds on which that decision is based to the individual or entity concerned, in order to observe the rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and the right to judicial review, and that, given that those persons or entities were not informed of the evidence adduced against them, they had also been unable to defend their rights with regard to that evidence in satisfactory conditions before the Community judicature,
) potrdile tri zaporedne odločitve Sveta o tem, da se odvetnikom Joseja Marie Sisona ne dovoli dostop do listin, na podlagi katerih se je Svet odločil, da ga uvrsti na seznam oseb, ki so tarča posebnih omejevalnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001,
) upheld three successive Council decisions to deny lawyers for Jose Maria Sison access to the documents underlying the Council’s decision to include him on the list of persons subject to specific restrictive measures under Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001,
; popolni pregled vseh imen na skupnem seznamu,
; a complete review of all the names on the Consolidated List,
L. ker še vedno ni mednarodnega pravnega mehanizma za nadzor/pregledovanje točnosti podatkov, ki so podlaga za uvrščanje na črni seznam s strani odbora za sankcije Združenih narodov, ali potrebe po sprejetih ukrepih in njihove sorazmernosti; ker posamezniki še vedno nimajo pravice do sodnega varstva ali varstva kvazisodnega organa na ravni Združenih narodov Cameron, str.
L. whereas there is still no international legal mechanism for checking/reviewing the accuracy of the information forming the basis of a UN Sanctions Committee blacklisting, or the necessity for, and proportionality of, the measures adopted; whereas the individual still has no right of access to a court or a quasi-judicial body at UN level Ibid Cameron, p.
Nujnost doslednega in jasnega pristopa ter ustrezne udeležbe Parlamenta
Need for a coherent and clear ap proach and proper involvement of Parliament
2. meni, da je na specifičnem področju protiterorističnih sankcij težko v praksi upravičiti razlikovanje med „notranjo” in „zunanjo” nevarnostjo, še zlasti ko bi te sankcije lahko kršile tudi pravice državljanov EU in oseb, ki stalno prebivajo v EU, v skladu z Listino Cameron, str.
Takes the view that, in the specific area of anti-terrorism sanctions, the distinction between 'external' and 'internal' threats is difficult to justify in practice, especially when such sanctions could also infringe the rights of EU citizens and residents under the Charter Ibid Cameron, p.
4. znova izraža zahtevo, da se na letni ravni temeljito oceni izvajanje določb o omejevalnih ukrepih in njihovo učinkovitost ter da se hkrati ustrezno in pravočasno obvešča Parlament o teh vprašanjih; meni, da morajo v ta namen sankcije vedno spremljati jasna merila uspešnosti;
Reiterates its request for a thorough evaluation of the implementation, on an annual basis, of the provisions prescribing restrictive measures and of their effectiveness, together with proper and timely transmission of information to Parliament in such matters; considers that, to this end, sanctions should always be accompanied by clear benchmarks;
6. poudarja, da se pripombe, ki sledijo, med drugim nanašajo na vsebino predlogov, ki jih je predložila Komisija v skladu s prejšnjim pravnim okvirom in so postali z novim pravnim okvirom iz Lizbonske pogodbe zastareli; poudarja, da je sklicevanje na Sklep Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
Emphasises that the following comments refer, inter alia, to the substance of the proposals put forward by the Commission under the former legal framework, which are now obsolete in the light of the legal framework established by the Treaty of Lisbon; points out that any reference to Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
O omejevalnih ukrepih, uperjenih proti nekaterim osebam in subjektom, povezanim z Osamo bin Ladnom, mrežo Al Kajda in talibani
On restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban
10. se v zvezi z obrazložitvijo, ki mora biti predložena, sprašuje, ali predlog Komisije in besedilo Sveta ustrezata zahtevam iz sodbe v prej omenjeni zadevi Kadi in Al Barakaat International Foundation proti Svetu in Komisiji , v kateri se Sodišče sklicuje na obvezno navedbo razlogov, zaradi katerih je bilo ime posameznika ali subjekta vključeno na seznam, in še posebej poudarja pravico posameznikov in subjektov, da so seznanjeni z dokazi, zbranimi proti njim;
Queries, in relation to the ‘statement of reasons’ to be provided, whether either the Commission proposal or the Council text complies with the requirements of the judgment in the above-mentioned case of Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council and Commission , which referred to the obligation to communicate the grounds on which, in such cases, the name of a person or entity is included in the list, taking into particular account the right of persons and entities concerned to be informed of the evidence against them;
13. meni, da bi bilo nujno treba izboljšati postopke Združenih narodov pri oblikovanju seznamov in umiku z njih ter da bi si morale države članice prizadevati tudi za izboljšanje internih postopkov za izvajanje usmerjenih sankcij, kot je bilo omenjeno v prej omenjenemu poročilu in dopolnilu Odbora za pravne zadeve in človekove pravice pri parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope;
Considers that improvements in UN listing and de-listing practices should be pursued as a matter of urgency and that Member States should also work towards improving their internal targeted sanctioning (implementation) procedures, as suggested in the above-mentioned report and addendum by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;
O nekaterih omejevalnih ukrepih proti Zimbabveju in nekaterih posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim fizičnim in pravnim osebam, subjektom in telesom, povezanim z razmerami v Somaliji
On certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe and on certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Somalia
15. meni, da je treba opraviti natančen nadzor, da bi lahko ocenili, ali razlogi, zaradi katerih so bili sprejeti omejevalni ukrepi, še obstajajo, ter našli način, kako te ukrepe združiti z verodostojnimi pobudami za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic v Zimbabveju;
Is of the opinion that careful monitoring must be conducted in order to assess whether the grounds on which the restrictive measures were adopted persist, and to explore how restrictive measures can be combined with credible incentives to promote democracy and human rights in Zimbabwe;
18. poudarja, kot je izpostavil Odbor za pravne zadeve, da se za zadevne ukrepe uporablja člen 215 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, vendar je treba pred tem izpolniti vrsto pogojev: ukrepi morajo na primer temeljiti na predlogu podpredsednika Komisije/visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, Komisija pa mora vanje vključiti določbe, potrebne za pravna varovala;
Points out that, as underlined by its Committee on Legal Affairs, Article 215 TFEU would apply to the measures in question, but that a series of conditions should be fulfilled: measures must, for example, be based on a proposal from the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission must include the necessary provisions for legal safeguards;
O vidikih varstva podatkov
On data-protection aspects
, in da se ta omenja le v členu 7d(1);
, which is mentioned only in Article 7d(1);
(Pomanjkljivosti varstva podatkov v tretjem in drugem stebru EU; Ali lahko Lizbonska pogodba pomaga?), Common Market Law Review 2009, str.
Can the Lisbon Treaty be expected to help?’, Common Market Law Review 2009, p.
25. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter generalnima sekretarjema Združenih narodov in Sveta Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the Council of Europe.
10.12.2009 B7-0243/2009 PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA SVETU v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
10.12.2009 B7-0243/2009 PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL pursuant to Rule 121(1) of the Rules of Procedure
PE432.827v01-00 B7‑0243/2009 Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o 65. zasedanju generalne skupščine Združenih narodov
PE432.827v01-00 B7‑0243/2009 European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the 65th Session of the United Nations General Assembly
Prispevek Evropske unije k reformi Združenih narodov
The EU ’s contribution to the reform of the United Nations
10.12.2009 B7-0244/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
10.12.2009 B7-0244/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o prekinitvi pristopnih pogajanj s Turčijo
on breaking off the accession negotiations with Turkey
PE432.828v01-00 B7‑0244/2009 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o prekinitvi pristopnih pogajanj s Turčijo
PE432.828 B7‑0244/2009 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on breaking off the accession negotiations with Turkey
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom Strategija širitve in glavni izzivi za obdobje 2009–2010 (KOM(2009)533),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled ‘Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2009-2010’, COM(2009) 533,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o napredku Turčije za leto 2009 ( SEC(2009)1334 ),
– having regard to the Turkey 2009 Progress Report ( SEC(2009)1334 ),
A. ker Komisija poudarja, da Turčija pri političnih kriterijih za pristop napreduje le malo, v omejenem obsegu ali pa sploh ne,
A. whereas, with respect to the political criteria for accession, the Commission emphasises that Turkey is making little, limited or absolutely no progress,
B. ker Turčija še vedno v celoti ne izvaja dodatnega protokola k pridružitvenemu sporazumu in tega glede na izjave njenega ministra za evropske zadeve Egemena Bagisa tudi ne namerava,
B. whereas Turkey has still not fully implemented the Additional Protocol to the Association Agreement and, according to statements made by its Minister for EU Affairs, Egemen Bağış, does not intend to do so,
C. ker prevzema pravnega sistema EU ni mogoče imeti za napredek, če se to ne odraža v realnosti,
C. whereas the adoption of the EU acquis cannot be deemed as progress if this is not reflected in the real situation,
D ker čedalje več ljudi v državah članicah Evropske unije, pa tudi v Turčiji, odklanja turško članstvo v Evropski uniji, temu mnenju pa se pridružuje tudi čedalje več vlad držav članic,
D. whereas more and more people in the EU Member States, and in Turkey, are opposed to Turkey becoming a member of the EU and an increasing number of Member State governments share this view,
10.12.2009 B7-0245/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
10.12.2009 B7-0245/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o položaju človekovih pravic v Turčiji
on the human rights situation in Turkey
PE432.829v01-00 B7‑0245/2009 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o položaju človekovih pravic v Turčiji
PE432.829/rev. B7‑0245/2009 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the human rights situation in Turkey
A. ker politični islam v Turčiji postaja čedalje vplivnejši in prodira na vsa področja življenja,
A. whereas political Islam in Turkey is gaining more and more influence and intruding into all areas of life,
B. ker temeljne svoboščine, kot so svoboda tiska, svoboda zbiranja ali svoboda izražanja, obstajajo le v omejenem obsegu,
B. whereas fundamental freedoms such as freedom of the press, freedom of assembly or freedom of opinion are very restricted,