natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
podpira predlog Komisije, da bi se v letu 2007 aktiviralo premostitvene klavzule, predvidene v členu 67 Pogodbe ES (z odpravo ovir pri pristojnosti Sodišča na področju naslova IV Pogodbe ES) in členu 42 Pogodbe EU, kot je že priporočil Evropski parlament Evropskemu svetu 14. oktobra 2004 ( Priporoča Evropskemu svetu in Svetu, naj pri opredelitvi prihodnosti OSVP upoštevata tri zahteve splošnega pomena: a) okrepiti legitimnost OSVP: ob sklepu, v skladu z duhom Ustave in že sprejetih sporazumov o izvajanju Pogodbe iz Nice, o prehodu k postopku soodločanja s Parlamentom, o odločanju s kvalificirano večino v okviru Sveta in o razširitvi nadzora Sodišča na področja OSVP, v prvi vrsti za ukrepe s področja priseljevanja (člen 67 Pogodbe ES) in za ukrepe v zvezi z bojem proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu (člen 42 Pogodbe EU); ),
endorsing the proposal by the Court of Justice that during 2007 the ‘passerelles’ provided for by Article 67 TEC (by eliminating the restrictions on the Court’s jurisdiction with regard to matters falling under Title IV of the TEC) and Article 42 TEU, as already recommended to the European Council on 14.10.04 by the European Parliament Recommends that, when defining the future of the AFSJ, the European Council and the Council base their actions on the following three general requirements: (a) enhancing legitimacy of the AFSJ: – by determining, in keeping with the spirit of the Constitution and of the agreements already concluded on the implementation of the Treaty of Nice, to use the codecision procedure, to use qualified majority voting in the Council and to extend the jurisdiction of the Court to cover the AFSJ, initially for immigration measures (Article 67 of the EC Treaty) and, subsequently, for measures connected with combating terrorism and international crime (Article 42 of the EU Treaty). ,
opozarja, da aktiviranje "premostitvene klavzule" dopušča odprto možnost Svetu, da se odloči o svojih pogojih glasovanja in da se v tem okviru lahko poišče več rešitev za, v določenih primerih in/ali za določena obdobja, ohranitev soglasja, pod pogojem, da se na vseh področjih, ki zadevajo pravice evropskih državljanov, ohrani soodločanje Parlamenta, saj slednji ne igra manj odločilne vloge od najmanjše države članice,
recalling that the activation of the ‘passerelle’ leaves the possibility open for the Council to decide on its voting conditions and that in this context various solutions could be found to preserve unanimity in certain cases and/or for specific periods, providing that, in any event in all matters affecting European citizens’ rights, there was EP codecision, and that the EP could not be viewed as having less decisive weight than the smallest Member State,
ker so "premostitvene klavzule", aktivirane na podlagi obstoječih pogodb, že v skladu z okvirom, ki ga nalaga ustavna pogodba in ne smejo iti preko predvidenega (na primer glede kvot na področju migracijske politike),
whereas the ‘passerelles’ activated on the basis of the existing Treaties are already consistent with the framework imposed by the Constitutional Treaty and do not go beyond what the latter provides for (e.g. with regard to migration policy quotas),
glede na številne zahteve državljanov in strokovnjakov za izboljšanje resničnega sodelovanja, kot je zapisano že v trenutnih pogodbah, kakor tudi na zahteve Sveta, znotraj katerega vse do danes ni sporazuma, ki bi omogočal pravo napredovanje tega sodelovanja,
having regard to the strong demand from citizens and practitioners for an improvement in practical cooperation, as the Treaties stand at present, as well as from the Council, within which, to date, there has been no agreement enabling genuine progress to be made with this cooperation,
ker se novih držav članice, ki izpolnjujejo schengenska merila, in ki bi lahko vstopile v sistem, ne sme krivično kaznovati z znatnimi zaostanki pri izvajanju SIS II (Druga generacija schengenskega informacijskega sistema),
whereas the new Member States which meet the Schengen criteria and are in a position to enter the system must not be unfairly penalised on account of significant delays in the implementation of SIS II (Second-Generation Schengen Information System),
ker je Evropski parlament dokazal zavidanja vredno hitrost in duh za kompromis, s tem, da je dosegel sporazum na prvi obravnavi treh zakonodajnih besedil, ki oblikujejo sveženj, ki se nanaša na pravno podlago za SIS II,
whereas the European Parliament has demonstrated remarkable speed and a noteworthy spirit of compromise in having secured an agreement at first reading on the three legislative texts which constitute the package relating to the legal basis for SIS II,
zahteva, da Komisija v letu 2007 posreduje Svetu osnutek sklepa za aktiviranje člena 42 Pogodbe EU in premesti v okvir Skupnosti (Naslov IV Pogodbe ES) ukrepe, ki se nanašajo na policijsko (vključno z EUROPOL-om) in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah (vključno z EUROJUST-om);
Calls on the Commission to submit to the Council in 2007 the draft Decision activating Article 42 TEU and bringing the provisions concerning police (including EUROPOL) and judicial cooperation on criminal matters (including EUROJUST) into the Community sphere (Title IV TEC);
zahteva, da Svet:
Calls on the Council:
- v skladu z mnenjem Parlamenta, nemudoma sprejme osnutek sklepa, ki temelji na členu 67(2) Pogodbe ES, ki zadeva odpravo ovir pri pristojnosti Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v okviru Naslova IV Pogodbe ES in da si prizadeva za pospešitev odločanj o predhodnih vprašanjih pri zadevah, ki izhajajo iz OSVP;
- to adopt as a matter of urgency, in keeping with Parliament’s opinion, the draft Decision based on Article 67(2) TEC with regard to removing the restrictions on the powers of the Court of Justice in the context of Title IV of the TEC and to do everything to speed up the handling of preliminary rulings in AFSJ matters;
- predvidi razširitev postopka soodločanja s Parlamentom in glasovanja s kvalificirano večino v Svetu v vseh primerih, kjer je to mogoče v skladu z veljavnimi pogodbami, kot so nezakonito priseljevanje ali vključevanje državljanov tretjih držav, kot je leta 2004 predvidelo nizozemsko predsedstvo Sveta;
- to provide for extending codecision with Parliament and qualified majority voting in Council to all areas where this is in keeping with the Treaties currently in force, such as legal immigration or integration of third-country nations, as planned in 2004 by the Dutch Council Presidency;
poziva Evropski svet, da Svetu in Komisiji posreduje smernice za:
Calls on the European Council to issue guidelines to the Council and Commission to:
ukrepati za okrepitev zaščite načel, na katerih je bila ustanovljena Evropska unija (člen 6 Pogodbe EU), kot tudi mehanizmov za opozarjanje in sankcije, predvidenih v členu 7 Pogodbe EU.
take steps to strengthen the protection of the founding principles of the EU (Article 6 TEU) and of the early warning and penalty mechanisms provided for in Article 7 of the TEU.
Sodna praksa evropskih sodišč, ustavnih sodišč in raziskave, tako na ravni Sveta Evrope kot Evropskega parlamenta, dokazujejo, da mora biti spoštovanje teh načel stalna skrb držav članic in institucij Evropske unije, ter da bi slednje morale določiti javna referenčna merila za izboljšanje kakovosti sodnega sistema in policijskega sodelovanja; v tem okviru bi sprožitev postopka za obveščanje, predvidenega v členu 7(1) Pogodbe EU, sodila med običajna merila za medsebojno pomoč, potrebna za zagotavljanje visoke stopnje zaščite načel, predvidenih v členu 7 Pogodbe EU;
The case law of the European Courts, the Constitutional Courts, and the inquiries launched both at Council of Europe and EP level are enough to show that observance of those principles must be a constant concern for Member States and for EU institutions and that the former must set themselves public reference criteria for improving the quality of justice and police cooperation; in this context, activating the alert procedure provided for by Article 7(1) of the TEU should be one of the normal mutual assistance measures necessary for ensuring a high level of protection for the principles laid down in Article 6 of the TEU;
odgovoriti na zahtevo za dejansko izboljšanje sodelovanja v praksi prek krepitve in harmonizacije pristojnosti, s katerimi trenutno razpolagajo Eurojust in njegovi nacionalni člani, zlasti prek podeljevanja dejanske moči za usklajevanje preiskav in kazenskih pregonov, pristojnosti za sprožitev kazenskih pregonov, doprinos k reševanju sporov glede pristojnosti, kot tudi prek podelitve pristojnosti Europolu za organiziranje in usklajevanje preiskav in operativnih ukrepov skupaj s pristojnimi organi držav članic v okviru skupnih preiskovalnih skupin; nacionalni parlamenti in Evropski parlament morajo vsako leto razpravljati o napredku in težavah, na katere so naleteli med takšnimi dejavnostmi ter preveriti, če so na ravni nacionalne in evropske zakonodaje potrebne spremembe;
meet the call for genuine improvement of practical cooperation through strengthening and harmonising the present powers of Eurojust and its national members, in particular by conferring a genuine power to coordinate investigations and prosecutions, a power to have prosecutions initiated, and help settle disputes over competence, and by conferring on Europol the power to organise and coordinate investigations and operational actions jointly with Member States’ competent authorities in joint investigation teams; each year, national parliaments and the European Parliament should discuss progress made and problems encountered with this type of activity and check whether adjustments are needed to national and European legislation;
se prepričati, da se prek evropske zakonodaje ne ustvarja stanja nadzora, in da so vmešavanja javne oblasti v uživanje svoboščin posameznikov strogo omejena ter da se jih periodično ocenjuje skupaj z Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti;
make sure that a surveillance state is not created via European legislation and that public authorities’ interference in the exercise of individual liberties is strictly limited and subject to periodic review involving the European Parliament and national parliaments;
zapolnitev trenutnega primanjkljaja znotraj evropske zakonodaje na področju obdelave zaupnih podatkov, kadar le-te zadržijo institucije EU ; posledično predvideti revizijo člena 9 Uredbe 1049/01, in oblikovanje odbora, znotraj EP, za nadzor zaupnih dejavnosti;
make good the current deficit within European legislation with regard to handling of confidential data when the latter are held by the EU institutions; provide, accordingly, for revision of Article 9 of Regulation 1049/01 and for the setting up within the EP of a committee to monitor confidential activities;
spodbujanje, s sprejetjem priporočil Sveta, uporabe, v državah članicah, načel/priporočil generalnega sekretariata Sveta Evrope pri uporabi člena 52 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, kar se tiče parlamentarnega nadzora nad tajnimi službami (zlasti glej bodoča priporočila parlamentarnega odbora, zadolženega za pregled dosjeja letov CIE);
promote, through the adoption of Council recommendations, the implementation in the Member States of the principles/recommendations of the COE’s Secretary-General with regard to applying Article 52 of the European Convention on Human Rights as regards parliamentary oversight over intelligence services (see in particular the future recommendations of the parliamentary committee tasked with considering the CIA flights issue);
poziva Svet, da Evropskemu parlamentu čim prej predloži smernice, ki jih trenutno črta glede osnutka okvirnega sklepa o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki so obdelani v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah; opozarja pred tveganjem, da bi se bistvo tega predloga izgubilo in spominja na obveze, ki jih je sprejel Svet glede političnega vključevanja Parlamenta pri sprejemanju tega okvirnega sklepa;
Calls upon the Council to submit to Parliament without undue delay the guideline which it is currently devising on the subject of the draft Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in connection with police and legal cooperation in criminal matters; warns against the risk of draining that proposal of its substance and recalls the undertakings given by the Council concerning Parliament’s political involvement in the adoption of the Framework Decision;
poziva nacionalne parlamente, da v čim krajšem času na nacionalni ravni preverijo vpliv novih določb, ki jih predvideva Svet na področju zaščite podatkov in izvajanja načela, da morajo biti baze obdelanih podatkov iz varnostnih razlogov dostopne in med seboj povezane; navaja, da se že zanima za upoštevanje rezultatov takšnega pregleda v mnenjih, ki jih bo na to temo posredoval Svetu;
Invites the national parliaments to ascertain as soon as possible the impact at national level of the new provisions contemplated by the Council as regards data protection and application of the principle that databases of data processed for security purposes must be accessible and interlinked; states now that it is interested in taking account of the results of that verification in the opinions it will deliver to the Council on these issues;
poziva Komisijo, da vsako leto objavi poročilo o dejavnostih skupine komisarjev, pristojnih za temeljne pravice; prav tako poziva Komisijo, da čim prej predloži pregled dejavnosti in sklepov, ki jih je sprejela zgoraj omenjena skupina v obdobju zadnjih dveh let in pol;
Urges the Commission to publish every year a report on the activities of the group of Commissioners in charge of fundamental rights; also urges the Commission to provide as soon as possible an overview of the activities and decisions taken by the above-mentioned group during the last two-and-a-half years;
tako za veljavno pravico do zakonodajne pobude držav članic (Svet bi se lahko obvezal in v skladu s členom 208 Pogodbe ES od Komisije zahteval, da predloži zakonodajne predloge na področjih, ki jih določi četrtina držav članic);
both as regards the Member States’ current right of legislative initiative (the Council could commit itself to asking the Commission, under Article 208 of the TEC to submit legislative proposals in areas indicated by a quarter of the Member States),
kot tudi, da se nacionalnim parlamentom omogoči, da oblikujejo svoje stališče glede potekajočih predlogov na področju OSVP.
and in order to allow the national parliaments to adopt positions on the proposals in question in the field of AFSJ.
Trenutno za te predloge velja rok šestih tednov, preden Svet odloči o danem predlogu.
They currently have a six week deadline before the Council decides on a given proposal.
Evropski parlament bi se lahko zavezal, da pred istim rokom ne sklene sporazuma v prvi obravnavi s Svetom;
The European Parliament could commit itself not to reach an agreement at first reading with the Council before the six week deadline has elapsed;
opozarja, da je treba ohraniti določeno skladnost pri zakonodajnih pristojnostih na ravni EU ter na primer ob tem predvideti, da se zakonodaja na področju priseljevanja ne omejuje samo na nezakonito priseljevanje, ampak pokriva tudi zakonito priseljevanje;
Recalls the need to maintain a certain consistency as regards legislative powers at EU level by providing, for example, for immigration legislation not to be limited to illegal immigration only, but to cover legal immigration too;
kar zadeva začasni sporazum z ZDA glede evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR), izraža globoko zaskrbljenost nad ameriškim pismom glede razlage tega sporazuma, ki kaže, da so ameriške oblasti interpretirale zadevo izven vsebine sporazuma, zlasti kar zadeva namero sporazuma, dostop agencij in organov ZDA do podatkov iz PNR ter številna podatkovna polja, ki se jih lahko poišče;
As far as the interim PNR agreement with the US is concerned, expresses its deep concern at the US letter of interpretation of the agreement which shows that the US authorities have an interpretation going beyond the content of the agreement, in particular as regards the purpose of the agreement, access by US agencies and bodies to the PNR data and the number of data fields that can be consulted;
poziva Svet, da nemudoma sprejme osnutek okvirnega sklepa o procesnih pravicah pri kazenskih postopkih na celotnem območju Evropske unije (KOM(2004)0328), ob ustreznem upoštevanju mnenja, ki ga je sprejel Evropski parlament 12. aprila 2005 (T6-0091/2005);
Urges the Council to adopt without delay the draft Framework Decision on procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union (COM(2004)0328), taking due consideration of the opinion adopted by the European Parliament on 12 April 2005 (T6-0091/2005);
poudarja, da je treba, v skladu s predvidenim v Temperah leta 1999:
Reiterates the need, as foreseen at Tampere in 1999:
- posplošiti načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, da bi tako postalo ključni element zakonodaje EU;
- to apply the principle of mutual recognition across the board, so as to make it the keystone of EU legislation;
- še bolj okrepiti dostop do sodnega sistema, kot je predvideno v predlogih na področju civilnega posredovanja, majhnih zahtevkov ("small claims") in odredb za plačilo;
- subsequently to strengthen access to justice, as provided for by the proposals concerning civil mediation, small claims and payment orders;
- predvideti ukrepe za harmonizacijo zakonodaje samo po oceni vpliva na področju temeljnih pravic, v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti;
- provide for legislative harmonisation measures only after an impact assessment concerning fundamental rights, involving national parliaments in the process;
poudarja potrebo po ohranitvi, tudi v primeru komunitarizacije tretjega stebra, in brez poseganja v prerogative Komisije, pravice držav članic, da si medsebojno pomagajo in se nadzirajo, kot se že dogaja pri schengenskem sodelovanju in pri boju proti terorizmu;
Affirms the need to preserve, even when communitarising the third pillar and without prejudice to the Commission’s prerogatives, the right of the Member States to help one another and to carry out reciprocal monitoring, as is already the case for Schengen cooperation and for the fight against terrorism;
podpira nedavno sporočilo Komisije, ki ima za cilj vzpostavitev sistema za ocenjevanje politik, povezanih z OSVP, in opozarja, da bi ocena morala:
Supports the recent Commission communication seeking to establish an AFSJ policy evaluation system, and recalls that the evaluation should:
biti predmet letnega sporočila Evropskemu parlamentu, da bi le-ta lahko o njem razpravljal v skladu s pogodbami in v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti;
be the subject of an annual communication to the European Parliament, so that the latter can debate it, in accordance with the Treaties, and involving the national parliaments in that debate;
še bolj vplesti predstavnike civilne družbe in akademskega sveta v ocenjevanje vpliva politik in ukrepov, povezanih z OSVP;
further involve the representatives of civil society and the academic world in evaluating the impact of AFSJ-linked policies and measures;
nazadnje meni, da najbolj visoko zastavljeni cilji ostajajo samo namere, če niso podprti s primernimi človeškimi viri in zadostnimi finančnimi sredstvi, ki omogočajo:
Believes, finally, that the noblest of objectives would remain mere good intentions if they are not backed up by adequate human and financial resources:
izvajanje načela solidarnosti in lojalnega sodelovanja (kot tudi finančnega) na ravni EU med državami članicami;
implementing at EU level the principle of solidarity and sincere cooperation, including financial cooperation between Member States;
prilagajanje pristojnosti evropskih agencij (Europol, Eurojust, Frontex, Olaf, CEPOL, ....), da se jim omogoči izvajanje strateških prednostnih nalog, ki so ji države članice opredelile na ravni EU;
adapting the powers of the European agencies (Europol, Eurojust, Frontex, Olaf, CEPOL, etc.) so as to enable them to implement the strategic priorities established by the Member States at EU level;
preprečevanje civilnih kriz mednarodnega obsega in soočanje z njimi.
making it possible to prevent and tackle civil crisis situations with international repercussions.
Na tem področju sta Komisija in generalni sekretariat Sveta že nabrala določeno strokovno znanje za takojšnje mobiliziranje človeških, tehničnih in finančnih virov;
Here, there already exists a certain amount of expertise at Commission and Council secretariat-general level for pooling human, technical and financial resources at very short notice;
poziva Komisijo, da si prizadeva za pospešitev začetka izvajanja druge generacije schengenskega informacijskega sistema in za obveščanje Evropskega parlamenta o napredovanju procesa, kot tudi, da obrazloži zamude, ki so že nastale in zamude, ki naj bi nastale v prihodnje;
Calls upon the Commission to endeavour to speed up the process of implementing the second-generation Schengen Information System, to keep the European Parliament informed regarding the advances made in the process and to submit justifications relating to delays which have already occurred and to any further delays which may occur in the future;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Evropskemu svetu, Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States.
o prepovedi poligamije v Evropi
on the prohibition of polygamy in Europe
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o prepovedi poligamije v Evropi
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the prohibition of polygamy in Europe
ker je v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije poligamija kaznivo dejanje,
whereas polygamy is regarded as a crime in all the countries of the European Union,
ker so v mnogih državah islamska združenja, v Italiji UCOI, začela s kampanjami, da bi nacionalna zakonodaja s področja družinskega prava priznala poligamijo,
whereas in many countries Islamic organisations (such as the UCOI in Italy) are campaigning for polygamy to be recognised in national family law,
ker je v državah, kjer je priznana poligamija, ženska žrtev vsakodnevnega nasilja ter ji niso priznane temeljne pravice in se ne spoštuje njenega dostojanstva,
whereas in countries where polygamy is common, women are subjected to violence on a daily basis and their most fundamental rights and personal dignity fail to be respected,
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbudi države članice k nadaljnjemu nepriznavanju poligamije v svojih zakonodajnih ureditvah, ker bi to bilo v nasprotju z zakonodajo Skupnosti s področja varstva ženskih pravic.
Calls on the Commission to invite the Member States to continue not to recognise polygamy in their national laws, on the grounds that it violates Community legislation on the protection of women.
o omejevalnih ukrepih pri prodaji igrač v obliki orožja
on restrictions on the sale of toy weapons
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o omejevalnih ukrepih pri prodaji igrač v obliki orožja
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on restrictions on the sale of toy weapons
ob upoštevanju negativnega mnenja, ki je bilo že večkrat izraženo v zvezi s prodajo igrač, podobnih orožju,
having regard to the adverse opinion expressed on a number of occasions by Parliament on the distribution of toys which resemble weapons of war,
ker v nekaterih evropskih državah obstaja zakonodaja, ki prepoveduje prodajo igrač, narejenih po vzoru orožja, izdelanega po drugi svetovni vojni,
whereas in several European countries there are legislatures which prohibit the sale of toys that are replicas of weapons built after the World War,
ker nobena igrača ni tako nevarna kot sodobne igrače, ki imajo obliko orožja, ne samo zato, ker lažno orožje ustrahuje kot pravo, ampak tudi zato, ker se s takimi igračami nove generacije vzgaja k prestopniškemu in nasilnemu obnašanju,
whereas no toys are more dangerous than the current toy weapons, not only because being threatened with a fake weapon is as terrifying as being threatened with a real one, but also because it teaches the new generations to behave in a deviant and violent manner,