natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja s tem v zvezi, da so bili specializirani odbori Parlamenta pri pripravi prve obravnave Parlamenta skromni pri svojih zahtevah po povečanju odobritev plačil v proračunu za leto 2007, glede na to, da so bile glavne nove pravne podlage dogovorjene v letu 2006 z namenom, da se bo novo načrtovanje izdatkov EU začelo v letu 2007;
Notes in this context that Parliament's specialised committees were modest in their demands for increased payment appropriations in the establishment of Parliament's first reading on the 2007 budget given that the main new legal bases have been agreed during the course of 2006 with a view to new EU spending programmes beginning in 2007;
na splošni ravni odobritev za prevzem obveznosti je Parlament ravnal previdno v skladu s specializiranimi odbori in ni zahteval uporabe instrumenta prilagodljivosti; določa odobritve za prevzem obveznosti na ali blizu zgornjih meja iz Priloge I Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 za večino razdelkov proračuna za leto 2007;
On the overall level of commitment appropriations, notes that Parliament has taken a prudent approach in line with that of the specialised committees and has not requested the use of the flexibility instrument; sets commitment appropriations at or close to the ceilings in Annex I of the IIA of 17 May 2006 for the majority of the headings of the 2007 budget;
v zvezi s Skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko (SZVP) je za leto 2007 sklenil ponovno vzpostaviti odobritve za prevzem obveznosti na ravni, ki je bila predvidena v predhodnem predlogu proračuna v višini 159 200 000 EUR, vendar pričakuje, da bo Svet uporabil nasvet Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 glede izdatkov za SZVP in kot je potrjeno pri izmenjavi pisem med predsednikom Brokom in Lewandowskim ter finskim ministrom Wideroosom;
On the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), decides to restore commitment appropriations for 2007 to the level foreseen in the Preliminary Draft Budget (PDB) of EUR 159 200 000, but expects Council to implement both the spirit and the letter of the IIA of 17 May 2006 as regards CFSP spending and as confirmed in the exchange of letters between Chairmen Brok and Lewandowski and Finnish Minister Wideroos;
Zagotavljanje stroškovne učinkovitosti
Delivering value for money
poudarja, da je bil pristop stroškovne učinkovitosti nov element v proračunskem postopku za leto 2007 za zagotovitev boljšega vrednotenja programov EU in nadzora nad izvrševanjem proračuna v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami Parlamenta in njegovimi institucionalnimi pristojnostmi;jemlje na znanje skupno izjavo v dogovoru s Komisijo o primernem izvrševanju proračuna in poudarja, da je splošen cilj tega proračunskega leta zagotavljanje večje stroškovne učinkovitosti evropskim državljanom ter odgovor na izzive, s katerimi se EU sooča z najboljšo možno delitvijo sredstev (glej priloženo izjavo);
Emphasises that the value for money approach has been an innovative element of the 2007 budgetary procedure with a view to ensuring improved evaluation of EU programmes and scrutiny of budget implementation in line with Parliament's priorities and its institutional prerogatives; notes the joint statement agreed with the Commission on proper budget implementation and emphasises that the overall objective of this exercise is to deliver better value for money to European citizens and to respond to the challenges which the EU faces through the best possible allocation of funds (see attached declaration);
opozarja na svoj sklep, da prenese 30 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev v skupni vrednosti nad 500 milijonov EUR v rezervo v približno 40 proračunskih postavk, pri katerih je bil Parlament zaskrbljen glede kakovosti in ravni izvrševanja proračuna na podlagi natančnega pregleda razpoložljivih virov informacij; pozdravlja konstruktiven odgovor Komisije na zahteve Parlamenta za sprostitev teh rezerv v svojih predlogih sprememb proračuna; poleg odgovora Komisije, ki je priložen običajnemu pismu o izvedljivosti v začetku novembra, je sprejel odločitev, da bo za dve proračunski postavki v rezervi ohranil 8 900 000 EUR; sklene nadaljevati s skrbnim spremljanjem kakovosti in izvrševanja izdatkov v teh postavkah v letu 2007 v skladu z izjavo o večji stroškovni učinkovitosti;
Recalls its decision to place 30% of appropriations, totalling over EUR 500 million, in reserve on nearly 40 budget lines on which Parliament has had significant concerns about the quality and level of budget implementation on the basis of a thorough examination of the available information sources; welcomes the constructive response of the Commission to the requirements set out by Parliament for the release of these reserves in its budgetary amendments; further to the response from the Commission annexed to its traditional early-November letter of executability, decides to maintain over EUR 8 900 000 in reserve on 2 budget lines; resolves to continue to monitor closely the quality and level of implementation of spending on these lines during the course of 2007 in line with a declaration on better value for money;
poleg tega pozdravlja srečanje z dne 15. novembra 2006 s komisarjem za finančno načrtovanje in proračun ter generalnim sekretarjem Komisije kot močan dokaz zavezanosti Komisije k pristopu stroškovne učinkovitosti; vzame na znanje, da bo Odbor za proračun Parlamenta v prvi polovici leta 2007 opravil predstavitev o nadaljevanju pristopa stroškovne učinkovitosti;
Further welcomes the meeting of 15 November 2006 with the Commissioner for Financial Programming and Budget and the Commission Secretary-General as a strong demonstration of the Commission's commitment to the value for money approach; notes that Parliament's Committee on Budgets will conduct, in the first part of 2007, a hearing on taking forward the value for money approach;
ponovno opozarja na velik pomen, ki ga Parlament pripisuje doseganju pozitivne izjave o zanesljivosti za sredstva z deljenim upravljanjem; poudarja, da namerava v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 17. maja 2006 zagotoviti, da bodo ustrezni revizijski organi v državah članicah pripravili oceno skladnosti sistemov upravljanja in kontrole s predpisi Skupnosti; ponovno zahteva, da bi se morale države članice obvezati, da bodo na ustrezni nacionalni ravni pripravile letni povzetek revizij in izjav, ki jih imajo na razpolago;pozdravlja razvoj dogodkov v eni državi članici, da bi konsolidirali vse ločene račune, na katerih se porablja denar EU ob deljenem upravljanju z namenom kasnejše revizije teh zneskov; meni, da bo pregled metodologije Računskega sodišča za ocenjevanje skladnosti s finančnimi pravili EU s postopkom medsebojnega pregleda z drugimi primerljivimi institucijami prispeval k izboljšanju pristopa Sodišča k reviziji računov EU; z začudenjem ugotavlja, da še ni bil opravljen noben medsebojni pregled ter zahteva, da se to opravi do 31. julija 2007;
Recalls the importance attached by Parliament to the achievement of a positive statement of assurance for funds under shared management; underlines its intention to ensure that, in line with the IIA of 17 May 2006, the relevant audit authorities in Member States produce an assessment of the compliance of management and control systems with Community regulations; reiterates that Member States should therefore undertake to produce an annual summary at the appropriate national level of the available audits and declarations; welcomes the recent development in one Member State to consolidate all the separate accounts where EU money is spent under shared management with a view to the subsequent auditing of these figures; considers that a review of the Court of Auditors' methodology for assessing compliance with EU financial rules through a peer review process with other comparable institutions will contribute to improvements in the Court's approach to auditing EU accounts; notes with amazement that no such peer review process has yet been completed; requests this to be done by 31 July 2007;
glede treh novih agencij (Agencija za kemikalije, Inštitut za enakost med spoloma in Agencija za temeljne pravice) ugotavlja, da so se Parlament, Svet in Komisija dogovorili o skupni izjavi glede financiranja in finančnega načrtovanja za te agencije v smislu Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006; glede obstoječih agencij sklene, da se ponovno vzpostavi predhodni predlog proračuna in prenese sredstva, ki presegajo referenčni znesek, v rezervo, dokler delovanje agencije ne bo pozitivno ocenjeno glede na njihove končne delovne programe; ugotavlja, da bi se ta vrednotenja morala zaključiti glede na srečanje vodij agencij spomladi 2007;
On the three new agencies (Chemicals Agency, Gender Institute and Agency on Fundamental Rights), notes the joint declarations agreed between the Parliament, Council and Commission regarding the financing and the financial programming for these agencies in the context of the IIA of 17 May 2006; regarding the existing agencies, decides to restore appropriations in the PDB but place in reserve increases above a reference amount pending a positive evaluation of the performance of the agencies against their final work programmes; notes that these evaluations should be completed in the context of a meeting with the Heads of the agencies in Spring 2007;
Priprava na pregled obdobja 2008/2009
Preparing for the 2008/2009 review
ponavlja svojo skrb, da bi morala Evropska unija razviti bolj proaktivno strategijo, da se bo spoprijela s priložnostmi in izzivi sedanjega procesa globalizacije; meni, da je ponovno ovrednotenje pristopa EU k partnerstvu s tretjimi državami in regijami s tem v zvezi potrebno ter da bi se morala uporaba pojma "strateški" pridržati za najpomembnejša partnerstva EU, kot so čezatlantsko partnerstvo z Združenimi državami Amerike;
Reiterates its concern that the European Union should develop a more pro-active strategy to engage with the opportunities and challenges of the ongoing process of globalisation; considers that a re-evaluation of the EU's approach to partnerships with third countries and regions is necessary in this context and that use of the term "strategic" should be reserved for the EU's most important partnerships, such as the trans-atlantic partnership with the United States of America;
potrjuje, da sta politična analiza, ki jo je pripravil "Začasni odbor za politične izzive in proračunska sredstva razširjene Unije 2007–2013", in ustrezna resolucija, ki jo je Parlament sprejel dne 8. junija 2005 UL C 124 E, 25.5.2006, str.
Confirms that the political analysis as prepared by the "Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013" and the relevant resolution adopted by Parliament on 8 June 2005 OJ C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p.
, še vedno osnova za revizijo in vsako morebitno spremembo medinstitucionalnega sporazuma; meni, da je treba vključiti tudi oceno uspešnosti in izvajanja nove generacije večletnih programov in instrumentov;
remain the basis for the review and any possible changes of the IIA; considers that the evaluation of the effectiveness and the implementation of the new generation of multiannual programmes and instruments have to be included;
ugotavlja, da je namen pripravljalnih ukrepov, ki jih je Parlament sprejel na podjetniškem in znanstvenem področju s Kitajsko in Indijo, opozoriti na pomen, ki ga Parlament pripisuje razvijanju močnejšega sodelovanja s hitro razvijajočima se državama;
Notes that the preparatory actions adopted by Parliament as regards business and scientific exchanges with China and India are intended to signal the importance attached by Parliament to developing stronger cooperation with these rapidly developing countries;
meni, da bi Komisija morala doseči večjo stopnjo preglednosti glede prednosti in pomanjkljivosti dela z NVO pri zagotavljanju razvojne pomoči EU; z vidika priporočil, da se mora o delovanju NVO opraviti analiza stroškov in koristi; namerava pregledati tudi področje za večjo uporabo mikrokreditov v prihodnji razvojni pomoči EU;
Considers that a greater degree of transparency should be achieved by the Commission as regards the advantages and disadvantages of working with NGOs in delivering EU development assistance; in this light recommends that a cost-benefit analysis be carried out on the functioning of NGOs; intends to examine further the scope for a greater use of micro-credits in future EU development assistance;
meni, da bi morala Komisija ponovno preveriti naravo strateškega partnerstva EU v poročilu, ki naj bi ga predstavila do 30. aprila 2007, v katerem je zlasti opredeljen pomen besede strateško, ter da je to samo en primer večje potrebe, da mora Evropska unija jasno opredeliti svoje splošne politične prednostne naloge tako, da jih bo možno čim bolj jasno sporočiti državljanom Evrope; ugotavlja, da so jasne politične prednostne naloge predpogoj za razdelitev proračunskih sredstev tem nalogam; poudarja, da je Parlament v svojem delu v zvezi s proračunom za leto 2007 že na začetku postopka določil svoje politične prednostne naloge ter tako oblikoval učinkovito strategijo za proračun 2007;
Considers that the Commission should re-examine the nature of the EU's strategic partnerships in a report to be presented by 30 April 2007, defining in particular the meaning of the word strategic, and that this is but one example of the wider need for the European Union clearly to establish its overall policy priorities in a manner that can be effectively communicated to the citizens of Europe; notes that clear policy priorities are a pre-requisite for the allocation of budgetary resources to these priorities; highlights that in its work on the 2007 budget Parliament established its policy priorities early in the procedure and so developed an effective strategy for the 2007 budget;
zato je prepričan, da bi moral Parlament graditi na pristopu opredeljevanja prednostnih nalog, ki ga je uporabil v proračunskem postopku 2007, med drugim z vrsto predstavitev specifičnih političnih tem, da bi opredelil svoje srednjeročne politične prednostne naloge; meni, da bi to lahko v skladu z odstavki 38 do 40 resolucije o letni strategiji politik z dne 18. maja 2006 pripomoglo k temu, da bi Parlament oblikoval strategijo za pregled obdobja 2008/2009;
Believes therefore that Parliament should build upon the priority-setting approach taken in the 2007 budgetary procedure, inter alia through a series of hearings on specific policy topics, to define its medium-term policy priorities; considers that, in line with paragraphs 38 to 40 of the APS resolution of 18 May 2006, this should contribute to the development by Parliament of a strategy for the 2008/2009 review;
Horizontalna vprašanja in ključni elementi po razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira
Horizontal issues and key elements per MFF heading
glede pilotnih projektov in pripravljalnih ukrepov ugotavlja, da so se z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 17. maja 2006 dvignile zgornje meje za nove projekte ter poudarja, da ti projekti omogočajo Parlamentu navedbo prednostnih področij za oblikovanje evropskih politik; zato predlaga številne nove projekte, ki so večinoma usklajeni s prednostnimi nalogami iz odstavka 6 resolucije o letni strategiji politik z dne 18. maja 2006;
On pilot projects and preparatory actions, notes the increased ceilings for new projects set out in the IIA of 17 May 2006 and highlights that these projects allow Parliament to indicate priority areas for developing European policies; decides therefore to propose a number of new projects broadly in line with the priorities set out in paragraph 6 of the APS resolution of 18 May 2006;
ugotavlja, da je bil sprejet pisni predlog spremembe št. 3/2007 Komisije in deli pisnega predloga spremembe št. 2/2007 Komisije, vključno z določbami, ki se nanašajo na klasifikacijo v zvezi s programom Herkul II in Evropskim skladom za prilagajanje globalizaciji; zavrača druge dele pisnega predloga spremembe št. 2/2007 ter sklene, da bo zagotovil ustrezne zneske in proračunsko nomenklaturo v skladu s svojimi zunanjimi prednostnimi nalogami;
Notes the adoption of the Commission's Letter of amendment No 3/2007 and the elements of the Commission's Letter of amendment No 2/2007 including the provisions relating to classification concerning Hercule II and the European Globalisation Fund; rejects other elements of Letter of amendment 2/2007 and decides to introduce appropriate amounts and budget nomenclature in line with its external priorities;
pozdravlja, da je bil dosežen dogovor, da bo v proračunu za leto 2007 za Evropski sklad za prilagajanje globalizaciji na voljo 500 000 000 EUR; poudarja, da je postopek, sprejet za vključitev sklada v proračun, v skladu z določbami točke 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 ter potrjuje svoje stališče, da je v skladu s sporazumom zaporedje virov, uporabljenih za financiranje Evropskega sklada za prilagajanje globalizaciji v letu N tisto, ki izhaja iz kronološkega zaporedja razpoložljivosti informacij o rezervah in zapadlih obveznostih, to je prvič, zapadle odobritve za prevzem obveznosti iz leta N-2, drugič, rezerva, ki ostane na voljo v letu N-1, in tretjič, zapadle odobritve za prevzem obveznosti iz leta N-1; pozdravlja stališče Komisije v zvezi s tem vprašanjem, ki ga je izrazila v pismu komisarke za finančno načrtovanje in proračun predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta z dne 17. novembra 2006,
Welcomes the agreement reached to make available an amount of EUR 500 million for the European Globalisation Fund budgeted for the year 2007; stresses that the procedure adopted for budgeting the Fund remains in conformity with the provisions of Point 28 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 and reaffirms its view that in accordance with the Agreement the order of the sources used for financing the European Globalisation Fund in a year N is the one resulting from the chronological sequence of availability of the information on margins and cancelled commitments, i.e. firstly, cancelled commitment appropriations from year N-2, secondly, margin left available in year N-1, thirdly, cancelled commitment appropriations from year N-1; welcomes the Commission's view on this issue as expressed in the letter of the Commissioner for Financial Programming and Budget to the President of the European Parliament of 17 November 2006;
Glavni elementi v skladu z razdelki medinstitucionalnega sporazuma
Main elements per IIA heading
potrjuje svoje prepričanje, izraženo v resoluciji o letni politični strategiji z dne 18. maja 2006, da so znanje, veščine, raziskovanje in razvoj, inovacije, tehnologije informacijske družbe, trajnosten promet in energetska politika osnova zdravega modernega gospodarstva in da so bistveni za ustvarjanje delovnih mest; zato se je odločil zavrniti znižanje sredstev, ki ga je Svet predlagal za številne pomembne proračunske postavke, namenjene izboljšanju konkurenčnosti gospodarstva EU; je sklenil povečati odobritve za prevzem plačil, čeprav na nižji ravni kot v prvi obravnavi, za prednostne programe, povezane z Lizbonsko strategijo, kot je Program za konkurenčnost in inovacije ter Sedmi okvirni program Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013);
Confirms its conviction expressed in its APS resolution of 18 May 2006 that knowledge, skills, research and development, innovation, information society technologies, and a sustainable transport and energy policy form the basis of a healthy modern economy and are essential for job creation; has therefore decided to reject the Council's approach of reductions in a number of crucial budget lines aiming at improving the competitiveness of the EU's economy; has decided to increase payment appropriations, albeit at a reduced level relative to its first reading, for priority programmes linked to the Lisbon agenda such as the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme (CIP) and the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013);
je prepričan, da je povečanje konkurenčnosti EU najpomembnejši dejavnik odziva EU na izzive globalizacije; zato meni, da je povečanje sredstev v razdelku 1a jasen znak za prihodnjo usmeritev porabe EU; opozarja na potrebo po primernem javnem financiranju, da bi dosegli takšen učinek finančnega vzvoda, kot se ga pričakuje od sofinanciranja s strani Evropske investicijske banke; nestrpno pričakuje predloge Komisije in Sveta o tej zadevi; poudarja, da je za Evropski investicijski sklad zaželeno povečanje dolgoročnega vpisanega kapitala, ki bi potekalo istočasno z uvajanjem novih nalog (vključno s programom za konkurenčnost in inovacije) v letu 2007 in s katerim bi se financirale dejavnosti projektov za prenos novih tehnologij, kot želijo Parlament, Svet ali Komisija;
Is convinced that raising the EU's competitiveness is an essential element of the EU's response to the challenges of globalisation; therefore considers increases in appropriations in heading 1a to be a clear signal of the future direction that EU spending should take; recalls the need for adequate public funding to create the pump-priming effect expected of European Investment Bank cofinancing; awaits with impatience the proposals by the Commission and Council on this subject; stresses that an increase in the long-term subscribed capital would be desirable for the European Investment Fund, both to accompany the introduction of the new mandates (including the CIP) in 2007 and to finance the new technology transfer project operations, as wished by Parliament, the Council or the Commission;
poudarja tehnološki in gospodarski pomen programa Galileo; opozarja Komisijo, da je za ta program v novem večletnem finančnem okviru, če gledamo obdobje kot celoto, namenjenih premalo finančnih sredstev, in poziva Komisijo, da čim prej najde izvedljivo in trajno rešitev, s katero bo zagotovljena uspešnost programa;
Stresses the technological and economic significance of the Galileo programme; reminds the Commission that, taken over the period as a whole, this programme is underfinanced in the new MFF and calls on the Commission to seek promptly a workable and lasting solution in order to ensure the success of this programme;
ugotavlja, da so sredstva za strukturne in kohezijske sklade v večletnem finančnem okviru za obdobje 2007–2013 znatno nižja, kot je bilo predvideno, kar je zlasti posledica sklepov Evropskega sveta decembra 2005; zato meni, da bi bilo treba ponovno vzpostaviti raven sredstev iz PPP; poudarja, da je zdaj, po sprejetju novega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, pomembno, da se čim prej določijo in potrdijo nacionalni programi; poudarja pomen kohezije kot ene od političnih prednostnih nalog EU; poziva Komisijo, naj tekom leta 2007 predloži zahtevo za prenos ali spremembo proračuna, če se izkaže, da predvideni zneski za predpristopno pomoč v proračunu za leto 2007 ne zadostujejo;
Notes that the appropriations for the Structural and Cohesion funds are considerably lower for the 2007-2013 MFF than had been anticipated, largely as a result of the conclusions of the December 2005 European Council; considers therefore that the appropriations in the PDB should be restored; underlines the importance of establishing and approving as quickly as possible national programmes now that the new IIA has been agreed; stresses the importance of cohesion as one of the policy priorities of the EU; on pre-accession assistance, asks the Commission to present a transfer request or amending budget during the course of 2007 if the amounts foreseen in the 2007 Budget turn out to be insufficient;