natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj pospešeno nadaljuje poenostavljanje skupne kmetijske politike in ob tem redno pregleduje zakonodajo in določi, ali je potrebna in ali so njene določbe učinkovite; v zvezi s tem naj predlaga dodatne ukrepe, na primer poenostavljena pravila prenosa za pravice do plačila pri neizkoriščenosti, spojitev manjših pravic do plačila, uvedbo enotne premije za manjše prejemnike, poenostavitev pravil za nacionalno rezervo ali njeno zmanjšanje ali ukinitev v odvisnosti od prehoda na regionalno/nacionalno enotno premijo na površino, opustitev propada pravic do plačila pri neuporabi, ukinitev ročno napisanih registrov goveda in druge živine;
Calls on the Commission to press on with the simplification of the CAP and, in so doing, regularly to review items of legislation to determine whether they are necessary and whether their actual provisions are expedient; states, in this regard, that it should propose additional measures, such as simplified transfer rules for payment entitlements in the event of non-activation, merging of minimum payment entitlements, introduction of a single premium in the case of small recipients, simplification, reduction or abolition of the rules governing the national reserve, depending on the transition to the regional/national single area payment, waiving the cancellation of payment entitlements in the event of non-use, abolition of handwritten registries for cattle and other livestock;
nadalje poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo pravočasna plačila ter Komisijo, naj omogoči predplačila kmetom;
Calls further on the Member States to ensure timely payments, and on the Commission to allow prepayments to be made to farmers;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi potrebne mehanizme, ki bi zagotavljali, da bo uvoz iz tretjih držav skladen s standardi za proizvode Skupnosti v smislu pogojenosti, varnosti hrane itd.;
Calls on the Commission to create the necessary mechanisms to ensure that third-country imports meet the same standards as Community products in terms of conditionality, food safety, etc;
Varnostna mreža
Safety net
meni, da je dodatno preprečevanje tveganj kot varnostna mreža ključnega pomena zaradi pričakovanega povečanja okoljskih in podnebnih nevarnosti, nevarnosti epidemij in velikega nihanja cen na kmetijskih trgih;
Considers that, in view of the anticipated increase in environmental and climate dangers and in the risk of epidemics and considerable price fluctuations in the agricultural markets, additional risk prevention is of vital importance as a safety net;
opozarja, da so tržno usmerjena proizvodnja, prilagojeno kolobarjenje, raznolikost, finančni tržni instrumenti, pogodbe znotraj dobavne verige in zavarovanja pomembni načini, s katerimi se kmetje lahko zavarujejo proti tveganju, in da so za njihovo ustrezno preprečevanje načeloma odgovorni kmetje;
Recalls that market-oriented production, appropriate crop rotation, diversification, financial market instruments, supply chain contracts and insurance are all important ways in which farmers can protect themselves against risk and that, in principle, responsibility for appropriate risk prevention lies with farmers;
meni, da je treba pri preprečevanju rušenja trga vzdrževati in obnavljati intervencijski sistem tako, da se ustvari pravo varnostno omrežje za izredne razmere, temelječe na načelih svetovnega trga;
Believes that, in order to address market failure, the intervention system should be kept and reformed into a strict safety net for exceptional circumstances with rules based on world market trends;
zato podpira predlog Komisije, da zniža intervencijski prag za tržne proizvode na nič in po potrebi močno znižan intervencijski prag obdrži samo pri pšenici;
Supports, therefore, the Commission's proposal to lower the intervention thresholds for market crops to zero, maintaining an - if appropriate reduced - intervention threshold only in the case of wheat;
meni, da je treba zaradi vse večjih tveganj nujno razviti zavarovalniške sisteme zasebnega gospodarstva ali mešane zavarovalniške sisteme, kot je paketno zavarovanje kmetijskih pridelkov; se zaveda, da to brez javne udeležbe pri financiranju ne bo mogoče; poudarja, da uvajanje teh sistemov ne sme pod nobenim pogojem ogrožati enakih konkurenčnih pogojev med različnimi državami članicami; poziva Komisijo, naj ob nastajajočih težavah v zvezi s podnebnimi ali okoljskimi katastrofami pretehta možnost prihodnjega uvajanja podpornega sistema za vso Skupnost;
Considers that private sector or mixed insurance schemes, such as multi-hazard insurance, must be developed as a matter of urgency in view of increasing risks; is aware of the fact that this can only succeed with public contributions to the financing; underlines the fact that the introduction of these schemes must not under any circumstances endanger the level playing field between the different Member States; calls on the Commission to consider introducing or supporting a Community-wide reinsurance system in the future, with a view to dealing with problems arising from climate-related or environmental disasters;
opozarja, da imajo tako rekoč vse pomembnejše tretje države takšne sisteme, ki jih podpira država;
Recalls that almost all relevant third countries operate this kind of State-aided system;
zato meni, da je treba najprej zagotoviti možnosti financiranja nacionalne ali regionalne podpore zavarovalniških sistemov od leta 2009, ki bodo upoštevali različna potencialna tveganja v Evropi; Komisija naj preveri, do kakšne mere se lahko skupnosti proizvajalcev, sektorska združenja, medstrokovne organizacije in zasebne zavarovalniške hiše vključijo v te sisteme;
Considers that, as a result, a first step should be the creation of sources of financing for the national or regional funding of risk insurance schemes starting in 2009, to take account of the various potential risks in Europe; considers also that the Commission should examine the extent to which producer groups, sectoral and interprofessional associations and private insurance companies can be incorporated into the schemes;
meni, da je verjetno treba dati sektorskim rešitvam (primerljivim z rešitvami v sektorju sadja in zelenjave) zaradi povsem različnih razmer v posameznih sektorjih prednost pred horizontalnimi pristopi;
Considers that, in view of the completely different conditions in the individual sectors, different sectoral solutions (comparable to the solution in the fruit and vegetable sector) are probably preferable to horizontal approaches;
meni, da bi ti ukrepi lahko bili delno financirani iz prvega stebra na osnovi člena 69, saj sodijo v področje tržne politike;
Considers that these measures should be partly funded under the first pillar on the basis of Article 69, since they fall within the scope of market policy;
zahteva, da Komisija preuči uvedbo instrumentov za obvladovanje krize trga in podnebnih kriz, ki bi bili namenjeni organizacijam proizvajalcev in zadrugam, kar bi jim pomagalo nositi stroške v primeru, če bi padel celokupni prispevek proizvoda s strani njihovih članov;
Requests the Commission to consider the possibility of introducing instruments for managing market crises and climate crises, aimed at producer groups and cooperatives, to help them bear the costs associated with a fall in the aggregate amount contributed by their members;
meni, da ukrepi obvladovanja in preprečevanje tveganj ne smejo privesti do ponovne uvedbe podpornih ukrepov, pogojenih s proizvodnjo;
Considers that risk management and risk prevention measures must not be allowed to lead to the reintroduction of support measures based on production;
zato meni, da mora Komisija razviti skupen okvir za podporo sistemov za obvladovanje tveganj s strani držav članic, ki upošteval sisteme, ki so že v uporabi ali ki jih je Komisija odobrila, da se čim bolj preprečijo učinki izkrivljene konkurence in trgovine, po potrebi z izdelavo pravil Skupnosti v enotni tržni ureditvi;
Considers, therefore, that the Commission must develop a common framework for the funding of risk management systems by Member States on the basis of respect for the systems currently in use or approved by the Commission in the past, in order to exclude, as far as possible, effects that distort competition and trade, if necessary by establishing common rules within the single market organisations;
poziva Komisijo, naj do 30. junija 2010 predloži izčrpno analizo obstoječih sistemov obvladovanja tveganj in možnosti njihovega nadaljnjega razvoja na ravni Skupnosti po letu 2013;
Calls on the Commission to submit, by 30 June 2010, a comprehensive analysis of existing risk management systems and possibilities for their further development at Community level after 2013;
poudarja, da imajo lahko postopno zmanjšane omejitve, modulacija in proračunska disciplina, če se predlogi Komisije izvedejo, občutne posledice na prerazporeditve v nekaterih regijah;
Points out that the imposition of degressive ceilings, modulation and budgetary discipline may, if the Commission's proposals are implemented, have a substantial redistributive impact in certain regions;
meni, da se morajo o vsaki spremembi odobrenih sredstev za razvoj podeželja, ki ni v skladu z dogovorjenimi zgornjimi mejami oz. delnimi zgornjimi mejami iz Priloge III k Medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006, dogovoriti vse tri podpisnice;
Considers that any change in rural development appropriations which is incompatible with the agreed (sub)ceilings of Annex III of the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) of 17 May 2006, must be agreed by all three signatory parties;
poudarja, da zaenkrat ni ocene vpliva nadaljnjega izvajanja modulacije, degresivnosti in najnižjih pragov na trg dela na podeželju in na regionalno kohezijo; zato poudarja, da mora biti opravljena ocena prvega stebra;
Points out that there has been as yet no impact assessment of the effects of further modulation, degressivity and minimum thresholds on the labour market in rural areas and regional cohesion; points out that, for that reason, an assessment of the first pillar must be carried out;
poudarja, da bi nižje meje, ki jih predlaga Komisija, lahko imele nezanemarljive posledice za nekatere države članice in bi lahko vplivale na razporeditev financiranja skupne kmetijske politike med državami članicami, medtem ko bi zgornja meja pomenila prenos kakih 500 milijonov EUR iz prvega v drugi steber; opozarja, da ostajajo resni pomisleki glede sedanje stroškovne učinkovitosti ukrepov drugega stebra; zato verjame, da bi moral prihranek iz morebitnega izvajanja tega ukrepa ostati v prvem stebru;
Stresses that the lower limits proposed by the Commission could have a non-negligible impact in some Member States and may affect the distribution of CAP payments between Member States, whereas the upper limit implies a transfer of some EUR 500 million from the first to the second pillar; recalls that there are serious doubts remaining regarding the present cost-effectiveness of second pillar measures; believes, therefore, that savings coming from the possible application of this measure should remain within the first pillar;
zavrača predlog Komisije o degresivnosti (z znižanjem do 45 %) v njegovi sedanji obliki, ker ni jasne povezave med obsegom in premožnostjo kmetije, kar onemogoči oceno potrebne delovne sile za ohranitev velikih kmetijskih gospodarstev; predlog Komisije bi neupravičeno oškodoval velike kmetije ali združenja ter pripeljal do zmanjšanja delovne sile in uničenja dobro razvitih, konkurenčnih struktur, prihajalo bi do cepitev kmetij zgolj z namenom pridobitve subvencij, kar bi v nekaterih pokrajinah Evrope privedlo do strukturnih zlomov;
Rejects the Commission proposal on degressivity (with a reduction of up to 45%) in its present form, as there is no clear link between the size and wealth of a farm, and as it fails to factor in the workforce needed to maintain a large scale agricultural holding; the Commission proposal would put large farms or associations at an unjustifiable disadvantage and lead to a reduction in the workforce and the destruction of well-developed, competitive structures and would result in the splitting of farms purely for support-related reasons, which would cause structural fracturing in some regions of Europe;
meni, da je degresivnost in/ali vzpostavitev zgornje meje smotrna samo na podlagi izčrpne ocene posledic za delovni trg in regionalno politiko in samo, če se zagotovi možnost, da se število delavcev, zaposlenih za poln delovni čas z obveznim socialnim zavarovanjem, ali nekatere strukture podjetja (podjetja, ki jih upravlja več družin, zadružne organizacije) ali skupni stroški kmetije za delovno silo upoštevajo kot dejavniki za zmanjševanje degresije; poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva, da manjše kmetije, ki so združene v skupnost, ki ima pravno osebnost zato, da lahko ustvarijo ekonomijo obsega in postanejo bolj konkurenčne, ne bi smele biti oškodovane;
Considers that degressivity and/or the establishment of maximum ceilings can only be acceptable on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of the consequences for the job market and regional policies, and only if it became possible for account to be taken of the number of full-time workers covered by social security or certain farm structures (farms run by several families, cooperative organisations, etc.) compram or the total farm labour costs, with a view to a reduction of degressivity; calls on the Commission to bear in mind that smaller farms joining together to form a single legal entity in order to create economies of scale and become more competitive should not be disadvantaged;
poziva, da sredstva z naslova degresivnosti ostanejo v regijah zadevne države članice in se tam na primer uporabijo za ukrepe po členu 69 ali iz drugega stebra; poziva, naj se ta sredstva neposredno namenijo kmetom;
Calls for any funds resulting from degressivity to be kept in the regions or Member State concerned, where they will be used, for example, to finance measures in accordance with Article 69 or under the second pillar; calls for these funds to be applied directly for the benefit of farmers;
podpira predlagani dvig najnižjih pragov, tudi v zvezi z letnim poročilom za 2006 Računskega sodišča, ki bi morali biti določeni na en hektar ali ustrezno vsoto 250 EUR, v kombinaciji z uvedbo enotne premije ali minimalne povprečnine za manjše prejemnike; vendar v bi moralo biti državam članicam omogočeno, da v ustrezno upravičenih primerih večjih razlik med kmetijskimi strukturami določijo najnižji prag;
Supports the proposed raising of the minimum thresholds, in light also of the 2006 annual report of the Court of Auditors, which could be set at one hectare or the corresponding amount of EUR 250, combined with the introduction of a single premium or a minimum lump sum for small recipients; states, however, that in duly justified cases of major differences in agricultural structures, Member States should be granted the option of setting the minimum thresholds;
vendar podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da zagotovi ustrezno financiranje trajnostne politike za podeželje v drugem stebru skupne kmetijske politike, čeprav ta cilj ne sme biti dosežen na račun prvega stebra;
Supports, however, the efforts of the Commission to secure appropriate financing for a sustainable policy for rural areas under the second pillar of the CAP, although that objective must not be attained at the expense of the first pillar;
opozarja, da glede na že tako radikalna posamezna zmanjšanja ni mogoče privoliti v nadaljnje zmanjšanje neposrednih plačil za 8 odstotkov brez predložitve ocene učinka;
Points out that, in view of the already drastic nature of individual reductions, a further reduction in direct payments of 8% cannot, in the absence of an impact assessment, be accepted;
meni, da je progresivna modulacija glede na močno razširjene zahteve po zmanjšanju večjih plačil na podlagi dosedanjih spoznanj in brez ocene učinka sprejemljiva ob upoštevanju strukturo kmetije (združenje itd.), delovne sile na kmetiji in/ali ceno delovne sile ter posamezne tipe proizvodnje v različnih sistemih neposrednih plačil (na primer specifične težave kmetij z visoko gostoto živine na razmeroma majhni površini).
Considers that, in light of widespread calls for a reduction in large payments, a progressive modulation could be envisaged, on the basis of the available information and on the basis of an impact assessment taking into account farm structure (associations etc), farm labour and/or labour costs and specific production types in the different direct payment systems (for example, specific problems of farms and regions with high density livestock on comparatively small areas).
Sredstva iz progresivne modulacije se razdelijo v skladu z veljavnimi pravili za modulacijske sklade in ostanejo v regiji države članice, v kateri so nastala;
The funds from the progressive modulation are to be distributed according to the prevailing rules governing modulation funds and to remain in the regions or Member State in which they accrue;
neposredna plačila od 10 000 do 100 000 EUR – 1 % (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 10 000 - 100 000 - 1% (for the entire period 2009-2013)
neposredna plačila od 100 000 do 200 000 EUR – 2 % (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 100 000 - 200 000 - 2% (for the entire period 2009-2013)
neposredna plačila od 200 000 do 300 000 EUR – 3 % (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013)
Direct payments of EUR 200 000 - 300 000 - 3% (for the entire period 2009-2013)
neposredna plačila nad 300 000 EUR – 4 % (za celotno obdobje 2009–2013);
Direct payments of over EUR 300 000 - 4% (for the period period 2009-2013)
terja, da prostovoljno modulacijo zamenja obvezna modulacija;
Calls for voluntary modulation to be replaced by compulsory modulation;
meni, da je treba sredstva modulacije prednostno zagotoviti za ukrepe, ki uporabljajo metodo LEADER, boj proti izgubi biotske raznovrstnosti in preprečevanje tveganj, prilagajanje spremembi podnebja, ukrepe za trajnostno uporabo biomase, spremljevalne ukrepe pri strukturnih reformah (npr. ureditev trga z mlekom), zavarovanje proizvodnje v gorskih območjih, na majhnih otokih in podobnih zapostavljenih območjih, zagotavljanje kakovosti, vključno z ukrepi za zaščito živali, biološko kmetovanje, prodajne ukrepe in prilagajanje tehničnemu napredku; poziva, naj se ti ukrepi neposredno namenijo kmetom;
Considers that modulation funds should be made available primarily using the LEADER method and for measures aimed at combating the loss of biodiversity, risk insurance, adapting to climate change, measures targeting the sustainable use of biomass, accompanying measures for structural reform (e.g. organisation of the milk market), safeguarding production in mountain or small island regions and other similarly disadvantaged areas, quality assurance including animal welfare measures, organic farming, disposal measures and adapting to technical advances; calls for all these measures to be targeted directly at farmers;
se zaveda, da se sistem mlečnih kvot po letu 2015 verjetno ne bo nadaljeval v sedanji obliki in poziva Komisijo, naj temeljito preuči prihodnjo ureditev trga z mlekom; poziva Komisijo, naj za obdobje po letu 2015 predloži prepričljiv načrt za mlečni sektor, ki bo zagotavljal, da se bo proizvodnja mleka v Evropi nadaljevala tudi na hribovitih, odročnih in drugih posebno težavnih regijah;
Is aware that the current system of milk quotas in its present form is unlikely to be continued after 2015, and calls on the Commission to carry out a comprehensive examination of how the organisation of the milk market might look in the future; calls on the Commission to put forward for the period after 2015 a convincing plan for the milk sector that guarantees the continuation of milk production in Europe, including in mountain regions, outlying regions, and other regions with specific difficulties;
opozarja Komisijo na svoje sklepe Sprejeta besedila z dne 5.9.2007, P6_TA(2007)0371 , P6_TA(2007)0372 , P6_TA(2007)0373 .
Draws the Commission's attention to its decisions Texts adopted of 5.9.2007, P6_TA(2007)0371 , P6_TA(2007)0372 , P6_TA(2007)0373 .
v okviru mini paketa za mleko v zvezi s tržnimi ukrepi in skladom za mleko;
in connection with the mini-milk package concerning market measures and the milk fund;
poziva vse udeležence, naj čas do leta 2015 izkoristijo za utrditev ali okrepitev svojega položaja na trgu ter po možnosti s povečanjem strukturnih kvot zagotovijo "nežen pristanek" evropskega mlečnega sektorja;
Calls on all parties involved to use the time up until 2015 to stabilise or strengthen market positions, and ensure a 'soft landing' for the European dairy sector, preferably by structural quota increases;
terja, da se mlečne kvote ob spremembah v povpraševanju na svetovnih trgih ustrezno prilagodijo trgu; zato meni, da bi morale države članice v mlečnem letu 2008/2009 prostovoljno povečati kvote za 2 %; poziva Komisijo, naj to povečanje dodeli nacionalni rezervi; poziva k letnemu pregledu kvot;
Calls for the milk quota to be adjusted according to the market in response to changes in demand on world markets; considers, therefore, that quotas should be increased by 2% in the milk year 2008/2009 on a voluntary basis for each Member State; calls on the Commission to allocate the increase to the national reserve; calls for an annual review of the quota;
poleg tega poziva k znatnemu znižanju dodatnih dajatev za mlečno leto 2009/2010 in nadaljnjim znižanjem v naslednjih letih, da omeji porast cen kvot, ter k naknadnemu vseevropskemu saldiranju, ki bo omogočilo njihov boljši izkoristek;
Calls, furthermore, for a substantial reduction in the super-levy for the 2009/2010 milk year and further decreases in subsequent years in order to counterbalance a rise in quota prices and for Europe-wide ex-post offsetting of quotas in order to enable quotas to be better utilised;
poziva k posebnim spremljevalnim ukrepom, ki bodo preprečevali opuščanje mlečne proizvodnje v gorskih in drugih posebej težavnih območjih, kjer ni alternativ za tradicionalno mlečno proizvodnjo ali bi opuščanje kmetijstva privedlo do izgube pomembnih naravnih območij;
Calls for specific accompanying measures to prevent the dairy industry in mountain regions and other regions with particular difficulties from being abandoned in cases where there are no alternatives to the traditional dairy industry or where abandoning agricultural activity would lead to the loss of areas of natural significance;
meni, da je treba predvsem v skladu s členom 69 zagotoviti dovolj sredstev za ohranitev mlečne proizvodnje zlasti v gorskih območjih, najbolj oddaljenih regijah (kot so Azori) in drugih regijah s podobnimi težavami, na primer z dodatki na plačila na površino (primerljivo z ukrepi v sektorju sladkorja), v obliki premij za krave molznice, travnike ali ekstenzivno pašo, s posebnimi premijami za mleko ali posebnimi regionalnimi programi za krepitev ali preoblikovanje sektorja ter podporo nekaterih visokokakovostnih proizvodov;
Considers that sufficient funds to maintain the dairy industry – especially in mountain areas, outermost regions (such as the Azores) and other regions with comparable difficulties – must be made available, primarily by means of Article 69, e.g. by means of top-ups to area payments (comparable to measures in the sugar sector), in the form of premiums for dairy cattle, for grassland or extensive grazing, of a specific milk payment or special regional programmes to reinforce or restructure the sector and to promote specific high-quality products;
meni, da bi krepitev združenj proizvajalcev ter sektorskih in medpanožnih organizacij lahko bila nadaljnja sestavina revidiranega člena 69;
Considers that strengthening of producer associations, sectoral and inter-professional organisations could constitute a further element of the revised Article 69;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj preučijo možnost nelinearnega povečanja nacionalnih kvot, da bi lahko uvedle dodatna povečanja za države članice, v katerih so proizvodne kvote že od nekdaj prenizke;
Asks the Commission and the Member States to examine the possibility of a non-linear increase in national quotas with a view to introducing additional increases for Member States where the production quotas have traditionally been in deficit;