natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Meni, da bi morali vidike uvedbe postopkov uskladiti z direktivo, tako da bi veljalo naslednje:
The European Parliament considers that a directive should harmonise aspects of the opening of proceedings in such a way that:
– postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo proti dolžnikom, ki so fizične ali pravne osebe ali združenja;
– insolvency proceedings can be brought against debtors who are natural persons, legal entities or associations;
– postopki zaradi insolventnosti se začnejo pravočasno, da je rešitev podjetja v težavah še možna;
– insolvency proceedings are initiated in a timely manner in order to allow a rescue of the troubled enterprise;
– postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo glede premoženja zgoraj omenjenih dolžnikov, premoženja subjektov, ki niso pravne osebe (npr. evropskega gospodarskega interesnega združenja), zapuščine in premoženja v skupni lasti;
– insolvency proceedings can be opened concerning the assets of the above-mentioned debtors, the assets of entities without legal personality (e.g. a European Economic Interest Grouping), a descendant’s estate and the assets of a community of property;
– postopke zaradi insolventnosti lahko uvedejo vsa podjetja, če bodo to storila začasno z namenom, da se zavarujejo;
– all companies can start insolvency proceedings in cases where the insolvency is temporary, in order to protect themselves;
– postopki zaradi insolventnosti se lahko uvedejo tudi po prenehanju pravne osebe ali subjekta brez statusa pravne osebe, če premoženje še ni bilo razdeljeno, ali če je premoženje še na razpolago;
– insolvency proceedings can also be opened after the dissolution of a legal entity or of an entity without legal personality, as long as the distribution of the assets has not yet taken place, or in cases where assets are still available;
– postopke zaradi insolventnosti lahko uvede sodišče ali drugi pristojni organ na pisni predlog upnika ali dolžnika; zahtevek za začetek postopka je mogoče umakniti, dokler se postopek ne prične ali sodišče zahtevka ne zavrne;
– insolvency proceedings can be opened by a court or other competent authority upon a written request of a creditor or the debtor; the request for the opening of the proceedings can be withdrawn as long as the proceedings have not been opened or the request has not been refused by a court;
– upnik lahko zahteva uvedbo postopka, če ima pravni interes in verodostojno dokaže, da je njegov zahtevek upravičen;
– a creditor may request the opening of proceedings if he/she has a legal interest therein and shows credibly that he/she has got a claim;
– postopek se lahko uvede, če je dolžnik insolventen, tj. nesposoben poravnati plačilne obveznosti; če zahtevek vloži dolžnik, je postopek lahko uveden tudi, če je dolžnik na pragu insolventnosti, tj. če je zelo verjetno, da dolžnik ne bo zmožen poravnati plačilnih obveznosti;
– proceedings can be opened if the debtor is insolvent, i.e. unable to satisfy the payment obligations; if the request is made by the debtor, the proceedings can also be opened if the debtor’s insolvency is imminent, i.e. if the debtor is likely not to be able to satisfy the payment obligations;
– kar zadeva dolžnikovo obvezno razglasitev stečaja, je mogoče postopek uvesti od enega do dveh mesecev po prenehanju plačevanja, če sodišče še ni začelo predhodnega postopka ali sprejelo drugih ustreznih ukrepov, da se zaščiti premoženje, in če je še razpoložljivo ustrezno premoženje za kritje stroškov postopkov zaradi insolventnosti;
– as far as mandatory filing for bankruptcy by the debtor is concerned, the proceedings must be opened within a period of between one and two months after the cessation of payments if the court has not already initiated preliminary proceedings or other appropriate measures in order to protect the assets and provided that adequate assets are available to cover the costs of the insolvency proceedings;
– države članice morajo določiti pravila, po katerih bi bil dolžnik odgovoren, če ne bi vložil zahtevka za začetek postopka ali če ga ne bi vložil ustrezno, morajo pa tudi poskrbeti za učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije;
– Member States are required to lay down rules rendering the debtor liable in the event of non-filing or improper filing, and to provide for effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Priporočila o uskladitvi nekaterih vidikov prijave terjatev
Recommendation on the harmonisation of certain aspects of the filing of claims
Evropski parlament predlaga uskladitev pogojev, pod katerimi je mogoče prijaviti terjatve v postopkih zaradi insolventnosti.
The European Parliament proposes harmonisation of the conditions under which claims in insolvency proceedings are to be filed.
Meni, da bi morali z direktivo uskladiti vidike prijave terjatev, tako da bi veljalo naslednje:
The European Parliament considers that a directive should harmonise aspects of the filing of claims in such a way that:
– datum za ugotovitev neplačanih terjatev je isti kot datum začetka insolventnosti delodajalca, se pravi datum sklepa o zahtevi za začetek postopka zaradi insolventnosti;
– the date for determining outstanding claims is the date on which the employer becomes insolvent, i.e. the date of the decision on the application to open insolvency proceedings or the date when the opening of proceedings was refused on grounds that the costs were not covered;
– upniki pisno prijavijo terjatve pri upravitelju v določenem časovnem roku;
– creditors file their claim with the liquidator in written form within a certain period of time;
– države članice to obdobje določijo od enega do treh mesecev od datuma objave sklepa o stečaju;
– Member States are required to fix the above-mentioned period of time within one to three months from the date of publication of the bankruptcy decision;
– upnik mora posredovati dokumentacijo, s katero dokaže terjatev;
– the creditor is required to submit documentation in support of the claim;
– upravitelj pripravi seznam vseh prijavljenih terjatev in ga posreduje pristojnemu sodišču v smislu člena 2(d) uredbe o insolventnosti;
– the liquidator establishes a table of all claims filed and that table is displayed at the competent court within the meaning of point (d) of Article 2 of the Insolvency Regulation;
– pozne prijave, tj. prijave upnika, ki prispejo po preteku roka za prijavo terjatve, se preverijo, vendar ima lahko upnik zaradi njih dodatne stroške.
– late filings, i.e. filings by a creditor who has missed the deadline for filing the claim, are to be verified but may entail additional costs for the creditor in question.
Priporočilo o uskladitvi vidikov izpodbijanja dolžnikovih dejanj
Recommendation on the harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions
Evropski parlament predlaga uskladitev vidikov izpodbijanja dolžnikovih dejanj, tako da bi veljalo naslednje:
The European Parliament proposes harmonisation of aspects of avoidance actions in such a way that:
– zakonodaja držav članic določa možnosti za izpodbijanje pravnih dejanj, ki se na škodo upnikov izvedejo pred začetkom postopka;
– the laws of the Member States provide for the possibility of challenging acts done before the opening of the proceedings which are detrimental to the creditors;
– pravna dejanja, ki jih je mogoče izpodbijati, so transakcije v primeru neizbežne insolventnosti, oblikovanje zavarovanih terjatev, transakcije s povezanimi strankami in transakcije, katerih namen je goljufanje upnikov;
– acts that can be the object of an avoidance action are transactions in a situation of imminent insolvency, the creation of security rights, transactions with connected parties and transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors;
– obdobje, v katerem je mogoče izpodbijati pravna dejanja, je različno dolgo, kar je odvisno od njihovega značaja; obdobje se začne z datumom vložitve predloga za začetek postopka; traja lahko od tri do devet mesecev za transakcije v primeru neizbežne insolventnosti, od šest do dvanajst mesecev za oblikovanje zavarovanih terjatev, od enega do dveh let za transakcije s povezanimi strankami ter od tri do pet let za transakcije, katerih namen je goljufanje upnikov;
– the periods during which an act can be challenged by an avoidance action vary according to the nature of the act at issue; the periods start with the date of the request for the opening of proceedings; the periods could be between three and nine months for transactions carried out in a situation of imminent insolvency, between six and twelve months for the creation of security rights, between one and two years for transactions with connected parties, and between three and five years for transactions carried out with the intention of defrauding creditors;
– dokazno breme glede izpodbojnosti dejanja načeloma nosi stranka, ki trdi, da je mogoče dejanje izpodbijati; za transakcije s povezanimi strankami nosi dokazno breme povezana oseba.
– the onus of proof to show whether or not an act can be challenged lies in principle with the party who claims that the act can be challenged; for transactions with connected parties, the onus of proof lies with the connected person.
Priporočilo o uskladitvi splošnih vidikov zahtev za kvalifikacijo in delo upraviteljev
Recommendation on the harmonisation of general aspects of the requirements for the qualification and work of liquidators
– upravitelja mora potrditi pristojni organ države članice oziroma ga mora imenovati pristojno sodišče v državi članici, imeti mora dober ugled in ustrezno izobrazbo, ki je potrebna za opravljanje njegovih dolžnosti;
– the liquidator must be approved by a competent authority of a Member State or appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction of a Member State, must be of good repute and must have the educational background needed for the performance of his/her duties;
– upravitelj mora biti usposobljen in kvalificiran za oceno položaja dolžnikove pravne osebe ter prevzem dolžnosti vodenja podjetja;
– the liquidator must be competent and qualified to assess the situation of the debtor’s entity and to take over management duties for the company;
– upravitelj ob začetku glavnega postopka zaradi insolventnosti dobi pooblastilo, da v roku šestih mesecev z učinkom za nazaj razglasi premoženje za zavarovano, če se v podjetju nadaljuje s prenosom sredstev;
– when main insolvency proceedings are opened, the liquidator should be empowered for a period of six months to decide on the protection of assets with retroactive effect in cases where companies have moved capital;
– upravitelju se omogoči, da s pomočjo ustreznih prednostnih postopkov povrne zneske, dolgovane družbi v višini, potrebni za poravnavo dolgov upnikom, oziroma s prenosom terjatev;
– the liquidator must be empowered to use appropriate priority procedures to recover monies owing to companies, in advance of settlement with creditors and as an alternative to transfers of claims;
– upravitelj mora biti neodvisen od upnikov in drugih deležnikov v postopkih zaradi insolventnosti;
– the liquidator must be independent of the creditors and other stakeholders in the insolvency proceedings;
– v primeru navzkrižja interesov mora upravitelj odstopiti s položaja.
– in the event of a conflict of interest, the liquidator must resign from his/her office.
Priporočilo o uskladitvi vidikov načrtov prestrukturiranja
Recommendation on the harmonisation of aspects of restructuring plans
Evropski parlament predlaga uskladitev vidikov oblikovanja, učinkov in vsebine načrtov prestrukturiranja, tako da bi veljalo naslednje:
The European Parliament proposes harmonisation of aspects of the establishment, effects and content of restructuring plans in such a way that:
– dolžniki ali upravitelji lahko kot alternativo upoštevanju zakonskih določb pripravijo načrt prestrukturiranja;
– as an alternative to complying with statutory rules, debtors or liquidators may present a restructuring plan;
– načrt mora vsebovati pravila za poplačilo upnikov in odgovornost dolžnika po zaključku postopkov zaradi insolventnosti;
– the plan must contain rules for the satisfaction of the creditors and for the debtor’s liability after the insolvency proceeding have been concluded;
– načrt mora vsebovati vse ustrezne informacije, da se upniki lahko odločijo, ali načrt lahko sprejmejo;
– the plan must contain all relevant information enabling the creditors to decide whether they can accept the plan;
– načrt se potrdi ali zavrne v posebnem postopku na ustreznem sodišču;
– the plan must be approved or disapproved in a specific procedure before the relevant court;
– v celoti poplačani upniki ali stranke, na katere načrt ne vpliva, ne bi smeli imeti pravice glasovanja o načrtu ali vsaj ne bi smeli imeti možnosti, da preprečijo njegovo izvedbo.
– unimpaired creditors, or parties that are not affected by the plan, should not be entitled to vote on the plan or, at least, should not be able to impede it.
Del 2: Priporočila glede revizije Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti
Part 2: Recommendations regarding the revision of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings
Priporočilo o področju uporabe uredbe o insolventnosti
Recommendation on the scope of the Insolvency Regulation
Evropski parlament meni, da je treba področje uporabe uredbe o insolventnosti razširiti, da bo vključevalo postopke zaradi insolventnosti, v katerih dolžnik ohrani premoženje ali v katerih je imenovan predhodni upravitelj.
The European Parliament considers that the scope of the Insolvency Regulation should be broadened to include insolvency proceedings in which the debtor remains in possession or where a preliminary liquidator has been appointed.
Ustrezno bi bilo treba revidirati prilogo A uredbe o insolventnosti.
Annex A to the Insolvency Regulation should be revised accordingly.
Priporočilo o opredelitvi pojma „središče dolžnikovih glavnih interesov“
Recommendation on the definition of ‘c entre of main interest s ’
Evropski parlament meni, da mora uredba o insolventnosti vključevati pojem „središče dolžnikovih glavnih interesov“, ki bo opredeljen tako, da bo onemogočal goljufivo prasko izbiranja najugodnejšega sodišča.
The European Parliament considers that the Insolvency Regulation should include a definition of the term ‘centre of main interest’ formulated in such a way as to prevent fraudulent forum-shopping.
Evropski parlament predlaga, da se doda uradna opredelitev, oprta na besedilo uvodne izjave 13, ki zadeva objektivno možnost določitve za tretjo stran.
The European Parliament suggests that a formal definition should be inserted, based on the wording of Recital 13, which is concerned with the objective possibility for third parties to ascertain it.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi morala opredelitev upoštevati značilnosti, kot so od zunaj določljivo splošno vodenje poslovnih dejavnosti, lokalizacija premoženja, središče operativne ali proizvodne dejavnosti, delovno mesto zaposlenih itd.
The European Parliament considers that the definition should take account of such features as the externally ascertainable principal transaction of business operations, the location of assets, the centre of the operational or production activities, the workplace of employees, etc.
Priporočilo o opredelitvi pojma „poslovalnica“ v kontekstu sekundarnih postopkov
Recommendation on the definition of ‘ establishment ’ in the context of secondary proceedings
Evropski parlament meni, da mora uredba o insolventnosti vključevati opredelitev „poslovalnice“ kot katerega koli kraja delovanja, kjer dolžnik opravlja neprehodno gospodarsko dejavnost z ljudmi, premoženjem in storitvami.
The European Parliament considers that the Insolvency Regulation should include a definition of ‘establishment’ as any place of operations where the debtor carries on a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods and services.
Priporočilo o sodelovanju med sodišči
Recommendation on cooperation between courts
Evropski parlament meni, da mora člen 31 uredbe o insolventnosti opredeliti nedvoumno dolžnost posredovanja informacij in sodelovanja ne le med upravitelji, ampak tudi med sodišči.
The European Parliament considers that Article 32 of the Insolvency Regulation should provide for an unequivocal duty of communication and cooperation not only between liquidators but also between courts.
Želi, da so v primeru začetka glavnega postopka zaradi insolventnosti roki za obravnavo tega postopka usklajeni in skrajšani.
In the event of main and secondary insolvency proceedings being opened, the timeframes for these procedures should be harmonised and shortened.
Evropski parlament meni, da bi bilo treba člen 13 uredbe o insolventnosti ponovno pregledati, da ne bi spodbujal čezmejnih izpodbijanj dolžnikovih dejanj, temveč bi pripomogel k neuspehu izpodbijanj dolžnikovih dejanj s pomočjo klavzul o izbiri prava.
The European Parliament considers that Article 13 of the Insolvency Regulation should be reviewed so that it does not encourage cross-border avoidance actions but helps to prevent avoidance actions from succeeding by means of choice-of-law clauses.
V vsakem primeru bi moral pregled določb o izpodbijanju dolžnikovih dejanj upoštevati stališče, da se dobro poslujoče podružnice insolventnega holdinga ne bi smele pripeljati do insolventnosti z izpodbijanjem dolžnikovih dejanj, temveč bi jih bilo treba v interesu dolžnikov prodati kot uspešna podjetja.
In any event, the review of the avoidance action rules should take into account the consideration that healthy subsidiaries of an insolvent holding company should not be driven into insolvency due to avoidance actions rather than being sold in the interests of the creditors as a going concern.
Del 3: Priporočila o insolventnosti povezanih družb
Part 3: Recommendations on t he insolvency of groups of companies
Evropski parlament meni, da bi morala Komisija zaradi različnih stopenj povezanosti, ki so možne v skupinah družb, predstaviti prožen predlog za ureditev insolventnosti povezanih družb, pri čemer bi upoštevali naslednje:
Due to the different levels of integration which may exist within a group of companies, the European Parliament considers that the Commission should present a flexible proposal for the regulation of the insolvency of groups of companies, taking into account the following:
Ko funkcionalna/lastniška struktura to omogoča, bi morali uporabiti naslednji pristop:
Whenever the functional/ownership structure allows it, the following approach should apply:
Določi se en strokovnjak za vodenje postopkov zaradi solventnosti (stečajni upravitelj).
C. A single insolvency practitioner should be appointed.
Za postopke zaradi insolventnosti pri decentraliziranih skupinah bi moral instrument poskrbeti za naslednje:
For insolvency proceedings in respect of decentralised groups, the instrument should provide for the following:
Na izmenjavo informacij, usklajevanje ravnanja in oblikovanje skupnih rešitev bi vplivalo naslednje:
These would affect the exchange of information, the coordination of operations and the drafting of common solutions:
– posredovanje informacij med sodišči na kakršen koli način,
– communication of information between courts by any means,
– usklajevanje upravljanja in nadzora dolžnikovega premoženja in poslov,
– coordination of the administration and supervision of the debtor's assets and affairs,
– pogajanja, odobritev in izvajanje insolvenčnih sporazumov o usklajevanju postopkov,
– the negotiation, approval and implementation of insolvency agreements concerning the coordination of proceedings,
– delitev nalog med strankami sporazuma;
– allocation of responsibilities between the parties to the agreement;
– razpoložljivost in usklajevanje pomoči;
– availability and coordination of relief;
– usklajevanje vračanja premoženja v korist upnikov nasploh;
– coordination of recovery of assets for the benefit of creditors generally;
– posredovanje in obdelava terjatev;
– submission and processing of claims;
– metode komuniciranja, vključno z jezikom, pogostostjo in sredstvi;
– methods of communication, including language, frequency and means,
– uporaba in odtujitev premoženja;
– use and disposal of assets;
– usklajevanje načrtov reorganizacije;
– coordination and harmonisation of the reorganisation plans;
– vprašanja, ki se posebej dotikajo sporazuma, vključno s spremembami in prenehanjem, razlago, učinkovitostjo in reševanjem sporov;
– issues related specifically to the agreement, including amendment and termination, interpretation, effectiveness and dispute resolution;
– upravno vodenje postopka, zlasti glede prekinitev postopka ali sporazumov med strankami, da ne bodo posegle po določenih pravnih dejanjih;
– administration of proceedings, in particular with respect to stays of proceedings or agreements between parties not to have recourse to certain legal actions;
– stroški in pristojbine.
– costs and fees.
Del 4: Priporočilo o oblikovanju registra insolventnosti na ravni EU
Part 4: Recommendation on the creation of an EU insolvency register
Evropski parlament predlaga, naj se v okviru evropskega portala e-pravosodje oblikuje register insolventnosti EU, ki bi za vsak uveden čezmejni postopek insolventnosti vseboval:
The European Parliament proposes the creation of an EU insolvency register in the context of the European e-Justice Portal, which should contain, for every cross-border insolvency opened, at least:
– ustrezne sklepe in odločbe sodišča;
– the relevant court orders and judgments,
– ime upravitelja in njegove kontaktne podatke;
– the appointment of the liquidator and that person's contact details,
– roke za prijavo terjatev.
– the deadlines for filing claims.
Posredovanje teh podatkov v register EU bi moralo biti za sodišča obvezno.
Transmission of these data to the EU registry by the courts should be compulsory.
Informacije bi morale biti navedene v uradnem jeziku države članice, v kateri je bil postopek uveden, in v angleščini.
The information should be expressed in the official language of the Member State in which the proceedings are opened and in English.
23. marca 2011 je Odbor za pravne zadeve pripravil delavnico o usklajevanju postopkov zaradi insolventnosti na ravni EU.
On 23.3.2011, the Legal Affairs Committee held a workshop on "harmonisation of insolvency proceedings at EU level".
Cilj delavnice je bil določiti, katera področja v nacionalnih predpisih o insolventnosti je mogoče in smiselno uskladiti.
The aim was to identify areas in national insolvency laws that are accessible and eligible for harmonisation.
Med pripravami predstavitve je Odbor za pravne zadeve naročil izdelavo študije z naslovom „Uskladitev insolvenčnega prava na ravni EU“.
In preparation of the hearing, the Legal Affairs Committee commissioned a study on "Harmonisation of Insolvency Law at EU level".
Priporočila v tem poročilu upoštevajo ideje, ki so jih strokovnjaki izpostavili v študiji in med predstavitvijo ter so bile dodatno obrazložene v spremljajočem gradivu.
The recommendations of this report take into account the ideas that experts elaborated in the aforementioned study and during the hearing and that were further explained in the accompanying documentation.
Na predstavitvi so bila obravnavana različna vprašanja, ki nakazujejo potrebo po četverni strukturi prihodnjih zakonodajnih pobud: (1) uskladitev, kjer je mogoče, (2) revizija uredbe o insolventnosti na področjih, kjer bo poleg uskladitve ostala veljavna in kjer je iz prakse razvidno, da so izboljšave možne, (3) izboljšanje sodelovanja upraviteljev in sodelovanja na upravni ravni na splošno v primerih, ko postanejo insolventna podjetja, ki so del povezanih družb, in (4) oblikovanje registra insolventnosti EU.
The different issues that were mentioned during the hearing suggested a four-fold structure of future legislative initiatives: (1) harmonisation where possible, (2) revision of the Insolvency Regulation where it will remain - in addition to harmonisation - relevant and where the practice has proven that improvement can be made, (3) improvement of the cooperation of liquidators and cooperation in general on administrative level in cases where enterprises that are part of a group of companies become insolvent and (4) creation of an EU Registry for insolvency cases.