natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja elemente reforme Komisije Uredbe ES o združitvah UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str.
Welcomes elements of the Commission's reform of the EC Merger Regulation OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
, a obžaluje, da Komisija ni podprla zaskrbljenosti Parlamenta v zvezi z elementi zadevnega predloga za reformo glede pravne varnosti in pravičnem postopku;
, but regrets that Parliament's concerns about some elements of the proposal regarding legal certainty and fair process were not supported by the Commission;
pozdravlja reorganizacijo Generalnega direktorata za konkurenco Komisije v okviru nadzora združevanja, zlasti prestrukturiranje med sektorskimi vrstami, krepitev gospodarske ocenitve in boljšo opredelitev vloge potrošnikov;
Welcomes the reorganisation of the Competition Directorate-General of the Commission in the context of the merger control, particularly the restructuring along sectoral lines, the strengthening of economic assessment and greater definition concerning the role of consumers;
pozdravlja obvezo Komisije, da pomaga desetim novim državam članicam, da bi se hitro prilagodile pravilom konkurence, protimonopolni zakonodaji in zlasti predpisom o državni pomoči ter poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s postopkom tehnične pomoči in sodelovanja;
Welcomes the Commission's commitment to help the ten new Member States to adapt rapidly to the competition rules, anti-trust legislation and, in particular, state-aid regulation and urges the Commission to pursue the process of technical assistance and cooperation;
pozdravlja obvezo Komisije, da nadaljuje politiko okrepljenega dvostranskega sodelovanja z glavnimi trgovskimi partnerji Skupnosti in da razširi večstransko sodelovanje na področju konkurence; še posebej je treba Komisiji čestitati za zaključek sporazumov o sodelovanju na področju konkurence med Združenimi državami, Kanado in Japonsko;
Welcomes the Commission's commitment to pursue a policy of enhanced bilateral cooperation with the Community's main trading partners and to expand multilateral cooperation in the field of competition; in particular, the Commission must be congratulated for concluding cooperation agreements in competition matters with the United States, Canada and Japan;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s sodelovanjem z državami OECD, azijskimi državami (s posebnim poudarkom na Kitajski) in državami Latinske Amerike;
Urges the Commission to continue to cooperate with OECD countries, Asian countries (with a particular focus on China) and Latin American countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s pogajanji s STO o vzajemnem delovanju trgovine in politike konkurence v duhu Deklaracije iz Dohe novembra 2001;
Urges the Commission to pursue negotiations with the WTO on the interaction between trade and competition policy, in the spirit of the Doha Declaration of November 2001;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje to resolucijo Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission.
ob upoštevanju osnutka Sklepa Komisije o uporabi člena 86 Pogodbe o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil za javne storitve, ki so dodeljena nekaterim podjetjem, ki izvajajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, z dne 18. februarja 2004, kakor je bil za pripravo mnenja posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu 8. septembra 2004,
having regard to the Commission draft decision on the application of Article 86 of the Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest, of 18 February 2004, as transmitted to the European Parliament for opinion on 8 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju osnutka Direktive Komisije o spremembi Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji z dne 18. februarja 2004, kakor je bil za pripravo mnenja posredovan Evropskemu parlamentu 8. septembra 2004,
having regard to the Commission draft directive amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings, of 18 February 2004, as transmitted to the European Parliament for opinion on 8 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov Komisije o okviru Skupnosti za državno pomoč v obliki nadomestil za javne storitve (v nadaljnjem besedilu "okvir"), kakor so bili posredovani za pripravo mnenja Evropskemu parlamentu 8. septembra 2004,
having regard to the Commission working paper on a Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (the "Framework"), as transmitted to the European Parliament for opinion on 8 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 5, 16, 73, 86, 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 2, 5, 16, 73, 86, 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o storitvah splošnega pomena, še zlasti resolucij: z dne 17. decembra 1997 o sporočilu Komisije "Storitve splošnega pomena v Evropi" UL C 14, 19.1.1998, str.
having regard to its previous resolutions on services of general interest, in particular to its resolutions: of 17 December 1997 on the communication from the Commission on services of general interest in Europe OJ C 14, 19.1.1998, p.
; z dne 18. maja 2000 o osnutku Direktive o spremembi Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji UL C 59, 23.2.2001, str.
; of 18 May 2000 on the draft directive amending Commission Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings OJ C 59, 23.2.2001, p.
; z dne 13. novembra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije "Storitve splošnega pomena v Evropi" UL C 140 E, 13.6.2002, str.
; of 13 November 2001 on the Commission communication "Services of General Interest in Europe" OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p.
in resoluciji Komisije z dne 14. januarja 2004 o "Zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena" UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
and its resolution of 14 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju "Zelene knjige o storitvah splošnega pomena" Komisije ( KOM(2003)0270 ) in sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij – "Bela knjiga o storitvah splošnega pomena" ( KOM(2004)0374 ),
having regard to the Commission Green paper on services of general interest ( COM(2003)0270 ) and to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - White Paper on services of general interest ( COM(2004)0374 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000, Evropskega sveta v Laeknu z dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001 in Evropskega sveta v Barceloni z dne 15. in 16. marca 2002, od katerih zadnja zahtevata od Evropske komisije, da pojasni ureditev državnih pomoči v okviru člena 86(2) Pogodbe,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, the Laeken European Council of 14 and 15 December 2001 and the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002, the latter two of which request the Commission to bring some clarity to the State aid regime in the framework of Article 86(2) of the Treaty,
ob upoštevanju poročila, ki ga je novembra 2004 izdala skupina na visoki ravni, ki ji predseduje Wim Kok, glede lizbonske strategije, imenovane "Soočenje z izzivom – lizbonska strategija za rast in zaposlovanje" http://europa.eu.int/growthandjobs/group/index_en.htm.
having regard to the November 2004 report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok regarding the Lisbon Strategy entitled "Facing the challenge - the Lisbon strategy for growth and employment" http://europa.eu.int/growthandjobs/group/index_en.htm
ob upoštevanju členov I-3, I-5, II-96, III-122, III-166, III-167 in III-238 Pogodbe o sprejetju Ustave za Evropo, ki so jo države članice podpisale v Rimu 29. oktobra 2004,
having regard to Articles I-3; I-5; II-96; III-122; III-166; III-167; III-238 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, as signed by Member States in Rome on 29 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča v zvezi s storitvami splošnega pomena in še zlasti ob upoštevanju sodbe v primeru Altmark z dne 24. julija 2003 Primer C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, in Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-7747.
having regard to the case-law of the European Court of Justice relating to services of general interest, and in particular to the Altmark judgment of 24 July 2003 Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht [2003] ECR I-7747.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 29. septembra 2004,
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 29 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 12. oktobra 2004,
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 12 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 112(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 45 and 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0034/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0034/2005 ),
ker visoko kakovostne storitve splošnega pomena, dostopne vsem, niso pomembne samo za socialno in gospodarsko povezanost, temveč lahko tudi v veliki meri prispevajo h konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva,
whereas high-quality services of general interest (SGI), accessible to all, are not only an important element of social and economic cohesion, but may also contribute considerably to the competitiveness of the European economy,
ker Pogodba o sprejetju Ustave za Evropo priznava pravico lokalnih organov do samouprave (člen I-5) in določa teritorialno povezanost kot splošni skupni cilj Unije (člen I-3),
whereas the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe recognises the right of local authorities to self-government (Article I-5) and makes territorial cohesion a general overall objective of the Union (Article I-3),
ker mora biti interes državljana v njegovi dvojni vlogi potrošnika (storitev) in davkoplačevalca vodilno načelo; ker morajo biti nadomestila za podjetja, ki zagotavljajo storitve splošnega pomena, odobrena samo z namenom, da bi zagotovili visoko kakovostne, dostopne in cenovno ugodne storitve; druge cilje je treba doseči z drugimi oblikami pomoči,
whereas the interest of the citizen in his dual role of consumer (of services) and taxpayer must be the guiding principle; whereas compensation to undertakings providing SGIs must be granted with the sole purpose of securing the provision of high-quality, accessible and affordable services; other objectives must be attained with other forms of support,
ker se, brez poseganja v obstoječa pravila notranjega trga, lokalne javne storitve izvajajo na podlagi odločitev, ki jih sprejmejo demokratično legitimirani organi, ki so blizu državljanom ter se lahko ustrezno in inovativno odzivajo na potrebe državljanov,
whereas, without prejudice to the existing internal market rules, local public services are run on the basis of decisions taken by democratically legitimised bodies close to the citizens and able to respond adequately and innovatively to citizens´ needs,
ker so notranji trg, liberalizacija in poštena konkurenca v celoti omogočili izboljšan dostop do storitev splošnega pomena, novih storitev z večjo izbiro, boljšo kvaliteto in nižje cene za potrošnike,
whereas the internal market, liberalisation and compliance with the rules on competition have on the whole led to improved access to SGIs, new services with more choice, better quality and lower costs for consumers,
ker bi glede na oblikovanje politike na podlagi jasnosti, Komisija morala predstaviti trdne in izčrpne ocene procesa liberalizacije, ob upoštevanju stališča vseh interesnih skupin (uporabnikov, lokalnih oblasti, podjetij itd.),
whereas, with a view to evidence-based policy making, the Commission should present a sound and exhaustive evaluation of the liberalisation process, taking into account the point of view of all stakeholders involved (users, local authorities, undertakings, etc.),
ker znaša skupni znesek državne pomoči, ki je letno dodeljen v Evropski uniji, več kot 50 % letnega proračuna Evropske unije tudi po najbolj konzervativni oceni; ker državna pomoč vpliva na sposobnost javnih financ in sposobnost zasebnih podjetij pri vlaganju v globalno gospodarsko okolje; ker nadomestila državne pomoči zberejo evropski davkoplačevalci in morajo zato biti odgovorno porabljena, ob zagotavljanju stroškovne učinkovitosti,
whereas the total amount of state aid granted each year in the European Union is equivalent to more than 50% of the annual budget of the European Union even by the most conservative estimates; whereas state aid has consequences for public finances, for competition and for the ability of private undertakings to invest in a globalised economic environment; whereas state aid compensation is raised from European taxpayers and must therefore be spent responsibly, providing value for money,
ker pa ni vedno mogoče jasno razločevati dveh ločenih kategorij, in sicer storitev splošnega pomena in storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ker ima kategorija "negospodarski" dve dimenziji: cilj in namen storitve in pravni status ponudnika (javni, zasebni ali drugo) ter gospodarski kontekst, v katerem deluje ponudnik (prosti trg, organizirani trg, državni monopol itd.); ker pri obeh vidikih med državami članicami obstajajo ogromne razlike, zaradi česar je enotna evropska opredelitev nemogoča in v nasprotju z načelom subsidiarnosti in samoupravljanja; ker je zaradi praktičnih in operativnih razlogov potrebno opredeliti merila za določitev, v kakšnih okoliščinah je možno dovoliti odstopanje od pravil konkurenčnosti; ker mora kategorija "negospodarski" temeljiti na merilih, ki zadevajo na eni strani namen storitve, na drugi pa značilnosti ponudnika storitev in gospodarski kontekst,
whereas it is not always possible to clearly distinguish two separate categories, namely SGI and Services of General Economic Interest (SGEI), as the qualification "non-economic" has two dimensions: the objective and purpose of the service and the legal form of the provider (public, private or other) and the economic context in which it operates (free market, regulated market, state monopoly, etc); whereas there are great differences across the Member States on both aspects, making a single European definition both impossible and contrary to the principles of subsidiarity and self-government; whereas for practical and operational purposes, however, it is necessary to draw up criteria for establishing under what circumstances exemptions to the competition rules may be granted; whereas the qualification "non-economic" must rest on criteria concerning both the purpose of the service on the one hand, and the service provider and economic context on the other,
ker ohranijo javni organi ves čas edino in glavno odgovornost pri oblikovanju okvira za merila in pogoje za izvajanje storitev, ne glede na pravni status ponudnika storitev in ne glede na to, ali se storitev zagotavlja na osnovi proste konkurence,
whereas public authorities retain sole responsibility at all times for setting the framework of criteria and conditions for service provision, irrespective of the legal status of the provider and of whether the service is provided on the basis of free competition,
ker je opredelitev storitev splošnega pomena, izbira ponudnikov storitev ter določanje okvirnih meril in pogojev stvar nacionalne, regionalne ali lokalne tradicije in kulturne raznolikosti ter jo je zato treba prepustiti pristojnim nacionalnim, regionalnim ali lokalnim oblastem v okviru njihove pravice do samoupravljanja in brez poseganja v obstoječa pravila notranjega trga,
whereas the setting of framework criteria and conditions for SGIs and the expected level of service are very much a question of national, regional or local traditions, and should therefore be left to the competent national, regional and local authorities, in the context of their right of self-government, and without prejudice to the current internal market rules,
ker je treba takšno storitev dodeliti z uradnim dejanjem, ki določa podrobnosti obveznosti storitev na način, ki zagotavlja, da predlagane določbe veljajo samo za priznane storitve javnega interesa,
whereas such a service should be assigned by way of an official act outlining the details of the service obligation, so as to ensure that only recognised SGIs will benefit from the proposed arrangements,
ker mora dodelitev z navedenimi uradnimi akti izpolnjevati merila o preglednosti in temeljiti na pogojih, enakih za vse kandidate,
whereas the assignment by such an official act must satisfy transparency criteria and be based on equal conditions for all competitors,
ker zajema pojem nadomestila katero koli vrsto pomoči, denarno ali v obliki fizičnih ali človeških virov ali na podlagi pravnega predpisa ali pravne narave statusa upravičenca v zvezi s financiranjem pogodbe,
whereas the concept of compensation encompasses any type of aid, whether in the form of cash or physical or human resources, or based on a legal provision or on the legal nature of the beneficiary's status with respect to the financing of the contract,
ker se predlog Komisije uporablja samo za tiste primere, ki ne izpolnjujejo vseh štirih meril, kakor so opredeljene v sodbi Sodišča v primeru Altmark; ker se nadomestilo ne šteje za državno pomoč, če so ta štiri merila izpolnjena,
whereas the Commission proposal applies only to cases which do not satisfy the four criteria defined by the Court of Justice in its Altmark judgment; whereas compensation is not deemed to be state aid if those four criteria are satisfied,
ker znesek nadomestila ne sme biti večja, kot je potrebno za opravljanje storitev, in se ne sme uporabiti za financiranje dejavnosti, ki niso del zadevne storitve (tako imenovano navzkrižno subvencioniranje),
whereas the amount of compensation may not exceed what is necessary for the operation of the service and must not be used to finance activities outside the scope of the service in question (so-called cross-subsidies),
ker morajo biti nadomestila dostopna vsem ponudnikom storitev, ne glede na njihov pravni status, ki so pooblaščeni za opravljanje storitev splošnega pomena,
whereas compensation must be available to all operators, irrespective of their legal status, which are entrusted with providing SGIs,
ker dodeljevanje državne pomoči monopolu najpogosteje ovira dobro delujoč trg in mora biti zato podrobno raziskano in utemeljeno,
whereas the granting of state aid to a monopoly usually constitutes an obstacle to a properly functioning market, and must therefore be thoroughly investigated and justified,
ker je treba storitev, za katero je v skladu s predlagano ureditvijo dovoljeno nadomestilo, dodeliti ali s poštenim in preglednim razpisnim postopkom ali z uradnim aktom, ki lahko ima, odvisno od prava v državi članici, obliko enega ali večih zakonodajnih ali regulatornih instrumentov ali pogodbe,
whereas the service for which compensation or state aid is permissible under the proposed arrangements should be assigned either by way of a fair and transparent tendering procedure or by way of an official act that, depending on the law in the Member States, may take the form of one or more legislative or regulatory instruments or a contract,
ker je težko oceniti področje uporabe in učinek predlogov brez zadevnih podatkov o številu podjetij, celotnem znesku državne pomoči in celotnem upravnem bremenu,
whereas it is difficult to judge the scope and impact of the proposals without data on the number of undertakings, the total amount of state aid and the total administrative burden involved,
ker bi morala biti obrazložitev za dodeljevanje državne pomoči podjetjem, odgovornim za storitve splošnega pomena,ali državnega nadomestila redno pregledana, če se pojavijo nove storitve, ali se katere ukinejo, ali nasprotno, če obstoječe storitve zastarijo ali se zaradi tehničnega napredka in družbenih sprememb opravljajo z novimi instrumenti,
whereas the justification for granting state aid to undertakings responsible for an SGI or state compensation should be reviewed at regular and appropriate intervals as new services emerge or, conversely, as existing services become obsolete or are provided by means of new instruments owing to technological progress and changes in society,
ker je potreben učinkovit in strog nadzor dodeljevanja državnih pomoči ali nadomestil, da se zagotovita poštena konkurenca in preglednost ter se prepreči diskriminacija,
whereas effective, stringent controls over the granting of state aid or compensation are required in order to ensure fair competition and transparency and to avoid discrimination,
ker bi se pri uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti Komisija morala osredotočiti na nadzor kršitev, ki občutno vplivajo na notranji trg; ker lokalne javne storitve običajno ne vplivajo na čezmejno trgovino,
whereas, when applying the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, the Commission should focus on controlling infringements that have a significant impact on the internal market; whereas local public services do not normally affect cross-border trade,
pozdravlja predlog Komisije in potrjuje cilj zmanjševanja nepotrebnih birokratskih zadev, pa tudi zagotavljanje pravnega pojasnila; opaža, da morajo v skladu z napovedmi Komisije v zgoraj omenjeni Beli knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena pravno pojasnilo vključevati opredelitev, kdaj nadomestilo ne pomeni državne pomoči; vendar poziva Komisijo, da pojasni, kaj ni državna pomoč;
Welcomes the proposals of the Commission and endorses the aims of reducing unnecessary red tape and providing legal clarification; notes that, as announced by the Commission in its abovementioned White Paper on services of general interest, legal clarification must include a definition of when compensation does not constitute state aid; calls on the Commission, however, to clarify what does not constitute state aid;
priporoča, da se ureditve za nadomestila in državno pomoč zagotovijo nemudoma, da bi najbolj omejili pravno praznino med izrekom sklepa v primeru Altmark in datumom začetka veljavnosti predlagane ureditve; meni, da mora ta ureditev upoštevati vse primere državne pomoči, ki so bili sprejeti pred njihovim začetkom veljavnosti in ki izpolnjujejo pogoje iz členov 1 in 2 Sklepa; meni, da naj se vse državne pomoči, ki ne izpolnjujejo teh zahtev, obravnavajo v okviru zadevnih okvirnih direktiv, smernic in mnenj;
Recommends that the arrangements be put in place without delay, so as to limit to a minimum the legal gap that exists between the pronouncement of the Altmark ruling and the date on which the proposed arrangements are to enter into force; considers that, pending their entry into force, these arrangements should apply to all state aid granted after the Altmark ruling and fulfilling the conditions laid down in Articles 1 and 2 of the Decision; considers that state aid not fulfilling those conditions should be dealt with in accordance with the relevant framework directives, guidelines and opinions;
poziva Komisijo, da ustrezno pojasni vse pravne posledice in soodvisnosti ter združljivost predlaganih instrumentov z obstoječo ureditvijo EU na področju javnih naročil ter v zvezi z zakonodajo EU za zadevne sektorje;
Calls on the Commission to clarify adequately all the legal consequences of the proposed instruments and how they interact and their compatibility with existing EU rules concerning public procurement and with sector-specific EU legislative provisions;
poziva Komisijo, da pojasni pravni status okvira, tudi zato da Evropskemu parlamentu omogoči, da v celoti odigra svojo vlogo v tej izrazito politični razpravi;
Asks the Commission to clarify the legal status of the Framework, also with a view to enabling the European Parliament to play its full role in this highly political debate;