natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ostro kritizira dejstvo, da dodelitev posebnih pravic črpanja v višini 250 milijard dolarjev ni bila vezana na prerazporeditev glasovalnih pravic, tako da bo 44 % te vsote dodeljenih skupini G7, torej največjim gospodarstvom, države s srednjimi dohodki in revne države pa bodo skupaj prejele le okoli 80 milijard dolarjev; močno obžaluje, da na vrhu skupine G20 niso obravnavali predloga predsednika kitajske centralne banke o reformi sistema posebnih pravic črpanja na podlagi skupnih sredstev; poudarja, da je bila tako zamujena priložnost, da bi naredili korak k „novemu brettonwoodskemu sistemu“;
Strongly criticises the fact that the $ 250 billion allocation of special drawing rights was not linked to a reshuffling of voting rights, so that 44% of this sum will go to the G7, i.e. the largest economies, and only about $ 80 billion will go to all the middle-income and poor countries combined; strongly regrets that the G20 summit did not discuss the proposal of the President of the Chinese Central Bank to reform the system of special drawing rights on a basis of global resources; points out that thus the opportunity to move towards a 'new Bretton Woods system' was missed;
kritizira, da namerava skupina G20 okrepiti vlogo Mednarodnega denarnega sklada pri ponovnem zagotavljanju kreditov, rasti in delovnih mest v svetovnem gospodarstvu; poudarja, da je treba začeti reforme instrumentov sprejemanja političnih odločitev, ki jih ima na voljo Mednarodni denarni sklad, in preprečiti, da bi skladi postali orodje zahodnega sveta; pozdravlja previdne napovedi glede izvajanja reformnega paketa glede kvot in glasovanja Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, kot je bilo dogovorjeno aprila 2008, in poziv Mednarodnemu denarnemu skladu, naj do januarja 2011 dokonča naslednjo revizijo kvot;
Criticises the intention of the G20 summit to strengthen the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in restoring credit, growth and jobs in the world economy; underlines the need to start with reform of the political decision-making instruments of the IMF in order to prevent the funds functioning as a tool of the 'western world'; welcomes the cautious announcements regarding implementing the package of IMF quota and voting reforms agreed in April 2008 and the call on the IMF to complete the next review of quotas by January 2011;
poziva k temeljiti reformi posojilne politike Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, ki na primer za Latvijo, Madžarsko in druge države pogojuje posojila z znižanjem plač in pokojnin ter krčenjem javnega sektorja in zdravstvenega varstva itd.; poudarja, da takšno pogojevanje posojil ne bo samo najbolj prizadelo najrevnejših družbenih slojev, ampak tudi poglobilo gospodarsko recesijo, saj močno zavira povpraševanje; poudarja, da podpora Evropske unije taki politiki ne more šteti kot evropska solidarnost v krizi;
Calls for a thorough reform of the lending policy of the IMF, which, for example, for Latvia, Hungary and other countries is making loans conditional on cuts in wages and pensions, downsizing of the public sector, curbing healthcare, etc; points out that these types of conditionality will not only hit the poorest strata of society worst but also deepen the economic recession since they heavily curb demand; points out that support for this policy by the EU cannot be considered as 'European solidarity' in the crisis;
podpira predlog sosveta Organizacije združenih narodov, ki ga vodi ekonomist Joseph Stiglitz, o zamenjavi institucije G20 z novim svetovnim gospodarskim svetom; poudarja, da bi bil tovrstni organ Organizacije združenih narodov veliko boljši forum za pripravo programa za svetovno gospodarsko in finančno politiko, saj bi zagotovil zastopanost manj in najmanj razvitih držav, ki so zdaj izključene iz procesa skupine G20; podpira predlog o vzpostavitvi novega svetovnega sistema rezerv, ki bi zagotavljal redno podporo državam v razvoju in pri katerem industrializirane države, ki močno vplivajo na obstoječe mednarodne finančne institucije, kot je Mednarodni denarni sklad, ne bi imele pravice veta;
Supports the proposal of the UN advisory panel headed by the economist Joseph Stiglitz for replacing the institution of the G20 with a new Global Economic Council; underlines that such a UN body would be a much better forum for setting the agenda for worldwide economic and financial policy, since it would ensure the representation of the less and least developed countries now excluded from the G20 process; endorses the proposal for creating a new global reserve system which would provide support to developing countries on a regular basis and would not be subject to veto by the industrialised countries that dominate existing international financial institutions such as the IMF;
pozdravlja, da so se voditelji skupine G20 sporazumeli, da so glavni razlogi za krizo bile velike pomanjkljivosti v finančnem sektorju ter pri finančnem urejanju in nadzoru; kritizira pa, da na vrhu niso uspeli obravnavati vprašanja nujne stabilizacije bank in finančnega sistema, da bi omogočili ponovno delovanje kreditnega sistema; poudarja, da je nujno treba vzpostaviti močnejši in globalno skladnejši nadzorni in regulativni okvir za finančni sektor v prihodnosti, ki bo podpiral trajnostni razvoj na svetovni ravni; poudarja, da bi se na vrhu morali dogovoriti tudi o vzpostavitvi veliko boljšega sistematičnega sodelovanja med državami za urejanje financ; poudarja, da mora finančni sektor sprejeti nižje donose in sisteme nagrajevanja, da bi preprečili tveganja in dosegali dolgoročne cilje namesto kratkoročnih dobičkov;
Welcomes the agreement by the G20 leaders that major failures in the financial sector and in financial regulation and supervision were fundamental causes of the crisis; criticises, however, the summit's failure to address the need for stabilisation of banks and the financial system in order to get the credit system working again; points out the urgent need to build a stronger and more globally consistent supervisory and regulatory framework for the future financial sector, which will support global sustainable development; underlines that the summit should also have agreed to establish much greater systematic cooperation between countries to regulate finance; stresses that the financial sector must accept lower returns and agree to bonus payment systems geared to risk aversion and long-term targets instead of short-term profits;
ugotavlja, da si voditelji skupine G20 prizadevajo za izvedbo akcijskega načrta, o katerem so se dogovorili na zadnjem srečanju, za ustanovitev novega odbora za finančno stabilnost, ki bi nasledil forum za finančno stabilnost, vključno z vsemi državami G20, člani foruma za finančno stabilnost, Španijo in Evropsko komisijo; vendar obžaluje, da odbor za finančno stabilnost nima formalnih pristojnosti in da naj bi deloval le vzporedno z Mednarodnim denarnim skladom; poudarja, da sploh ni bilo rešeno vprašanje, kako bi lahko odbor za finančno stabilnost zagotovil ustrezno nadziranje in izvajanje globalno usklajenih nacionalnih odzivov na reševanje krize;
Notes that the G20 leaders wish to implement the Action Plan agreed at their last meeting establishing a new Financial Stability Board (FSB) as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum (FSF), including all G20 countries, FSF members, Spain, and the European Commission; deplores, however, the absence of any formal powers for the FSB, which is supposed only to work alongside the IMF; points out that the question of how the FSB can ensure proper monitoring and implement global consistency between national responses for crisis management has not been resolved at all;
ostro kritizira, da bosta urejanje in nadzor obsegla samo vse sistemsko pomembne finančne institucije, instrumente in trge; poudarja, da je potrebna strožja ureditev, da bi preprečili nevarnosti zaradi novih in tveganih finančnih proizvodov, ki jih je treba prepovedati ali pa strogo omejiti in nadzirati njihovo trženje; ostro kritizira tudi, da naj bi urejanje preprečilo samo pretirane finančne vzvode; meni, da je treba glede tega uvesti stroge omejitve za vse regulirane finančne institucije; poudarja, da pokojninskim skladom, zlasti poklicnim pokojninskim skladom, ne bi smeli dovoliti naložb v finančne proizvode, kot so hedge skladi ali skladi zasebnega kapitala, ki pomenijo sistematično tveganje, ker bi lahko imel stečaj teh skladov negativne posledice za pokojninske pravice;
Strongly criticises the fact that the extent of regulation and oversight will include only all systemically important financial institutions, instruments and markets; underlines that stricter regulation is needed to prevent hazards caused by any new risky financial products and that either these must be prohibited or their trading must be severely restricted and monitored; strongly criticises, also, the notion that regulation should prevent only excessive leverage; believes that strict limits need to be introduced on leverage for all regulated financial institutions; underlines that pension funds, and especially occupational pension funds, must not be allowed to invest in financial products that entail systematic risks such as hedge funds or private equity, because the failure of such funds would negatively affect pension entitlement;
pozdravlja, da nameravajo voditelji skupine G20 ukrepati proti jurisdikcijam, ki niso pripravljene sodelovati, vključno z davčnimi oazami, in uvesti sankcije za zaščito javnih financ in finančnih sistemov; pozdravlja njihovo izjavo, da je obdobje bančne tajnosti končano; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da morajo države EU, ki delujejo kot davčne oaze (Avstrija, Belgija, Združeno kraljestvo in Luksemburg), in Švica odpraviti bančno tajnost in prenehati to nezaslišano ravnanje;
Welcomes the intention of the G20 leaders to take action against non-cooperative jurisdictions, including tax havens, and to deploy sanctions to protect public finances and financial systems; welcomes their declaration that 'the era of banking secrecy is over'; underlines in this context that EU countries that function as tax havens (Austria, Belgium, the UK, Luxembourg) as well as Switzerland must do away with banking secrecy and put an end to their outrageous practices;
poziva Evropsko unijo in države članice, naj obravnavajo tudi probleme, ki so nastali zaradi internih in eksternih „offshore“ finančnih centrov (Kanalski otoki, Kajmanski otoki itd.), in naj prepovedo poslovanje z njimi, če ne upoštevajo predpisov; poudarja, da globalni odziv na problem utaje davkov pomeni tudi, da se je treba osredotočiti na velike finančne centre, kajti mnoge manjše davčne oaze so le njihovi sateliti;
Calls on the EU and its Member States also to tackle the problems created by internal and external offshore financial centres (the Channel islands, the Cayman Islands, etc), and to prohibit doing business with these in case of non-compliance; underlines that a global response to the problem of tax evasion also means targeting the big financial centres, of which many of the small tax havens are mere satellites;
pozdravlja namero o razširitvi regulativnega nadzora in registracije na bonitetne agencije; poudarja, da potrebujemo za odpravo navzkrižja interesov, ki ovira postopke ocenjevanja bonitete, javno evropsko bonitetno agencijo, ki ne bo delala za dobiček;
Welcomes the intention to extend regulatory oversight and registration to credit rating agencies; points out that a public European Credit Rating Agency that does not work for profit is required in order to overcome conflicts of interest which impair the rating process;
obžaluje, da voditelji skupine G20 niso omenili predlogov o davkih na devizne transakcije (Tobinov davek) in na borzne transakcije (vključno s prosto prodajo);
Regrets that proposals on taxes on currency transactions ('Tobin tax') and on stock exchange transactions (including over-the-counter transactions) were not mentioned by the G20 leaders;
kritizira zavezo skupine G20 o zagotovitvi ambicioznega zaključka razvojnih pogajanj iz Dohe; poudarja, da bi ta razširil sistem trgovinskih pravil, ki škodijo gospodarstvom držav v razvoju in posegajo na področje njihove notranje politike; poziva k opustitvi pogajanj o javnih naročilih, pravicah intelektualne lastnine ter liberalizaciji naložb in storitev, saj so samo v interesu razvitih držav, ovirajo zagotavljanje javnih storitev ter ogrožajo gospodarsko in finančno stabilnost;
Criticises the commitment of the G20 summit to securing an ambitious conclusion to the Doha Development Round; points out that the Round would expand a system of trade rules that do harm to the economies of developing nations and interfere with countries' domestic policy space; calls for the suspension of the negotiations on government procurement, intellectual property rights, and the liberalisation of investment and services, since these are in the sole interest of the developed countries, undermine the provision of public services, and threaten economic and financial stability;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje voditeljem skupine G20, Svetu, Euroskupini, Komisiji, Evropski centralni banki, parlamentom držav članic, Odboru regij in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the G20 leaders, the Council, the Eurogroup, the Commission, the European Central Bank, the Parliaments of the Member States, the Committee of the Regions, and the European Economic and Social Committee.
ki ga predlagata Magor Imre Csibi in Péter Olajos
by Magor Imre Csibi and Péter Olajos
o spopadanju z izzivi krčenja in propadanja gozdov z namenom preprečevanja podnebnih sprememb in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti
on addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o spopadanju z izzivi krčenja in propadanja gozdov z namenom preprečevanja podnebnih sprememb in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti
European Parliament resolution on addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o spopadanju z izzivi krčenja in propadanja gozdov z namenom preprečevanja podnebnih sprememb in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti (KOM(2008)0645),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss (COM(2008)0645),
ob upoštevanju sklepov pete ministrske konference o varstvu gozdov v Evropi (MCPFE, 2007, Varšava, Poljska) o oceni posledic podnebnih sprememb za stanje gozdov in o politiki za trajnostno gozdarstvo,
having regard to the decisions taken at the Fifth Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE, 2007, Warsaw, Poland) on assessing the effects of climate change on the state of forests and on a policy for a sustainable forest economy,
ker želi EU omejiti globalno segrevanje na 2 °C in prepoloviti izgubljanje biotske raznovrstnosti; ker se v Eliaschevem poročilu ocenjuje, da bo za prepolovitev krčenja gozdov do leta 2020 vsako leto potrebnih med 17 in 33 milijard USD,
whereas the EU wishes to limit global warming to 2°C and to halve biodiversity loss; whereas the Eliasch Review estimates that USD 17-33 billion will be required annually to halve deforestation by 2020,
ker je trajnostno gozdarstvo življenjskega pomena pri boju proti krčenju gozdov in predstavlja bistven vidik gospodarskega razvoja,
whereas a sustainable forest economy is of vital importance in combating deforestation and is an essential aspect of economic development,
ker krčenje gozdov povzroča približno 20 % svetovnih emisij toplogrednih plinov, je glavni razlog za izgubljanje biotske raznovrstnosti in resna grožnja za razvoj, zlasti za preživetje revnih,
whereas deforestation accounts for some 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions, is a major driver of biodiversity loss and constitutes a serious threat to development and, in particular, to the livelihoods of the poor,
ker se gozdovi krčijo z zaskrbljujočo hitrostjo 13 milijonov hektarjev na leto – predvsem v tropskih območjih, do neke mere pa tudi v Evropi, zlasti srednji in vzhodni,
whereas deforestation occurs at the alarming rate of 13 million hectares per year, primarily in tropical forests, but also to a certain extent in Europe, especially Central and placeEastern Europe,
ker ima krčenje gozdov za posledico okoljsko škodo, ki jo je težko odpraviti, na primer dolgotrajne motnje v vodnih razmerah, nastajanje step in puščav ter zmanjšanje biotske raznovrstnosti, celotni gospodarski stroški tega pa zelo presegajo izdatke za ukrepe za zaščito in izboljšanje,
whereas deforestation results in environmental damage which is hard to reverse, such as long-term disruption of water conditions, steppe-formation and desertification, and biodiversity loss, the overall economic costs of which far exceed expenditure on protection and improvement measures,
ker ima propadanje gozdov različne pojavne oblike in ga je težko opredeliti, vendar močno vpliva na podnebje, biotsko raznovrstnost ter dobrine in storitve,
whereas forest degradation takes different forms and is difficult to define, but has major impacts on climate, biodiversity and goods and services,
ker je treba doseči veliko odstopanje glede na „običajno“ rast emisij v državah v razvoju, vključno z zmanjšanjem emisij, povezanih s krčenjem gozdov, poleg 25–40-odstotnega zmanjšanja v industrializiranih državah do leta 2020 glede na emisije iz leta 1990, da se segrevanje ozračja omeji na 2 °C v skladu s četrtim ocenjevalnim poročilom medvladnega foruma o podnebnih spremembah,
whereas a significant deviation from 'business-as-usual' emissions growth in developing countries, including a reduction in emissions related to deforestation, needs to be achieved in addition to a 25-40% reduction in industrialised countries by 2020 compared to 1990 to limit global warming to 2°C, according to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,
ker bo imelo zmanjšanje krčenja gozdov pomembno vlogo pri ublažitvi podnebnih sprememb, pa tudi pri prilagajanju nanje,
whereas reducing deforestation will play an important role as regards not only climate change mitigation but also adaptation to climate change,
poudarja, da je potrebna večja skladnost med varstvom gozdov ter politikami za trajnostno upravljanje in drugimi notranjimi in zunanjimi politikami EU; poziva h količinsko opredeljeni presoji vpliva politik EU na gozdove, na primer energetske (zlasti za biogoriva) in kmetijske politike ter politike o trajnostni proizvodnji in potrošnji, javnih naročilih, trgovini in razvojnem sodelovanju;
Stresses the need for more coherence between forest conservation and sustainable management policies and other EU internal and external policies; calls for a quantified evaluation of the impact on forests of EU policies such as energy (especially bio-fuels), agriculture, sustainable production and consumption, procurement, trade and development cooperation;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu in Svetu predstavi predloge za stroge zahteve Skupnosti glede vsega lesa in lesnih proizvodov, pridobljenih iz gozdov;
Calls on the Commission to present to Parliament and the Council proposals for stringent Community sustainability requirements for all timber and timber products sourced from forests;
poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2009 objavi celovito študijo o presoji vplivov, ki jih imajo proizvodnja, potrošnja in trgovina EU – tako prehrambenih kot neprehrambenih izdelkov – na krčenje gozdov in njihovo uničenje; poziva, naj se v študiji oceni in podrobno opredeli morebiten negativni prispevek različnih industrijskih sektorjev ter navede priporočila za nadaljnjo politiko in inovacije za zmanjšanje tovrstnih vplivov;
Calls on the Commission to publish by the end of 2009 a comprehensive study assessing the impact of EU production, consumption and trade in both food and non-food commodities on deforestation and forest degradation; calls for the study to evaluate and specify any negative contribution by different industry sectors and make recommendations for further policy and innovation, in order to reduce such impacts;
opozarja, da se je treba v okviru gozdarstva previdno spoprijeti s težavami, povezanimi z vodnimi razmerami, in opozarja, da je bistvena potreba po skupnem razvoju gozdnih in vodnih virov ter uskladitvi ustreznih politik EU, da se obnovi in izboljša zmožnost ekosistemov za zadrževanje vode;
Points out that problems relating to water conditions must be dealt with carefully in the context of the forest economy, and points to the vital need for joint development of forest and water resources and harmonisation of the relevant EU policies, with a view to restoring and improving the water retention capacity of ecosystems;
pozdravlja zelene politike javnih naročil in uveljavljanje instrumentov, kot so okoljsko označevanje in sistemi certificiranja gozdov; poziva k hitremu sprejetju in izvajanju zelenih politik javnih naročil za lesne proizvode v vsej EU; poziva države članice, naj njihova politika javnih naročil temelji na visokih trajnostnih standardih in naj ustrezno zastavijo cilje, povezane s tovrstnimi standardi;
Welcomes green public procurement (GPP) policies and the promotion of instruments such as eco-labelling and forest certification schemes; calls for the swift adoption and implementation of GPP policies for wood products across the EU; calls on the Member States to base their public procurement policy on high sustainability standards and accordingly to set realistic targets in relation to such standards;
meni, da je treba zagotoviti veliko finančno pomoč državam v razvoju, da najpozneje do leta 2020 zaustavijo surovo krčenje tropskega gozda, ter da bo dokaz predanosti temu odločilen pri mednarodnih pogajanjih o celovitem svetovnem podnebnem sporazumu za obdobje po letu 2012;
Considers that significant financial support must be provided to developing countries to halt gross tropical deforestation by 2020 at the latest, and that demonstration of commitment to this will be decisive in the international negotiations for a comprehensive global post-2012 climate agreement;
priznava, da bo uporaba zadostnih sredstev v okviru svetovnega podnebnega dogovora bistvena za prepolovitev in sčasoma ustavitev svetovnega krčenja gozdov; pri tem podpira predlog Komisije za oblikovanje svetovnega mehanizma za ogljik v gozdovih v okviru konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC), ki temelji na stalnem sistemu financiranja; poziva države članice, naj podprejo svojo zavezo za ustavitev svetovnega krčenja in uničevanja gozdov s tem, da velik del prihodkov od dražb v sistemu EU za trgovanje z emisijami namenijo za zmanjšanje krčenja in uničevanja gozdov v državah v razvoju ter z osredotočanjem na pogajanja o virih financiranja, kot so začrtani v sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Za celovit sporazum o podnebnih spremembah v Köbenhavnu; poziva države članice, naj podprejo predlog Komisije o sprejetju norveškega predloga financiranja in namenijo del prihodnjih prihodkov od dražb dodeljenih količin za svetovni mehanizem za ogljik v gozdovih;
Recognises that mobilising sufficient funding under a global climate deal will be absolutely crucial for halving and eventually halting global deforestation; supports, in this context, the Commission’s proposal to create a Global Forest Carbon Mechanism (GFCM) within the UNFCCC framework, based on a permanent financing scheme; calls on Member States to back up their commitment to halting global deforestation and forest degradation by earmarking a significant part of the auctioning revenues from the EU emissions trading scheme (ETS) for reducing deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries and by focusing the negotiations on funding sources as outlined in the Commission Communication entitled 'Towards a comprehensive climate change agreement in Copenhagen'; calls on Member States to support the Commission’s proposal to embrace the funding proposal made by Norway and to allocate part of future revenues from auctioning of Assigned Amount Units to the GFCM;