natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker člen 7(3) Sklepa 1999/468/ES in točka 1 Sporazuma določata, da Evropski parlament "prejema dnevne rede sej odborov, odborom predložene osnutke ukrepov za izvrševanje aktov […], izide glasovanj in povzetke zapisov sej ter sezname organov in organizacij, katerim pripadajo osebe, ki so jih države članice imenovale za svoje predstavnike",
whereas Article 7(3) of Decision 1999/468/EC and point 1 of the Agreement provide that the European Parliament 'is to receive, at the same time as the members of the committees and on the same terms, the draft agendas for committee meetings, the draft implementing measures submitted to the committees... and the results of voting and summary records of the meetings and lists of the authorities to which the persons designated by Member States to represent them belong',
ker je Evropski parlament osnutek odločbe, do katere je upravičen v skladu s Sklepom 1999/468/ES, prejel šele 28. januarja 2005 in še to zgolj na zahtevo,
whereas Parliament received the draft decision by virtue of its right of scrutiny pursuant to Decision 1999/468/EC only on 28 January 2005 and only upon request,
ker Evropski parlament do tega dne ni prejel skoraj nobenega od dokumentov, ki bi jih moral v zvezi z zasedanji odbora za prilagoditev zakonodaje ES o odpadkih znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku v letu 2004,
whereas, by that date, Parliament had received almost none of the documents that it should have received in relation to the meetings of the committee for the adaptation to scientific and technical progress of EC legislation on waste in the course of 2004,
ker je pristojni parlamentarni odbor Komisijo dne 3. februarja 2005 opozoril, da ni upoštevala Sklepa 1999/468/ES in Sporazuma; ker se je Komisija 16. februarja 2005 zavezala, da bo uvedla nov postopek komitologije in predložila vse manjkajoče dokumente,
whereas the committee responsible in Parliament raised the Commission's non-compliance with Decision 1999/468/EC and the Agreement with the Commission on 3 February 2005; whereas the Commission undertook to start a new comitology procedure and to submit all the missing documents on 16 February 2005,
ker je Evropski parlament 25. februarja 2005 prejel nov osnutek odločbe,
whereas Parliament received a new draft decision on 25 February 2005,
ker člen 5(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES dovoljuje spremembe, potrebne za prilagoditev Priloge znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku,
whereas Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC allows for amendments necessary to adapt the Annex to scientific and technical progress,
ker obstajajo ali že razvijajo varnejše alternative nevarnim snovem iz člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES za uporabo, ki imajo trenutno korist kot izjema,
whereas safer alternatives to the hazardous substances covered by Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are available or being developed for applications that currently benefit from an exemption,
ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES določa edino merilo, ki ga je mogoče upoštevati pri pripravi osnutka odločbe o dodatnih izjemah,
whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC lays down the only criteria that can be taken into consideration with a view to preparing a draft decision for additional exemptions,
ker Komisija v uvodni izjavi 2 svojega osnutka odločbe trdi, da je "uporaba teh nevarnih snovi v navedenih specifičnih materialih in sestavnih delih še vedno neizogibna",
whereas the Commission asserts in recital 2 of its draft decision that the 'use of these hazardous substances in those specific materials and components is still unavoidable',
ker se mora Komisija v skladu s členom 5(2) Direktive 2002/95/ES pred spreminjanjem Priloge med drugim posvetovati z zainteresiranimi stranmi in "poročati o prejetih podatkih",
whereas, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC, the Commission shall inter alia consult stakeholders before amending the Annex and 'shall provide an account of the information it receives',
dokazno breme veljavnosti ali neveljavnosti zahtevanih izjem so morale prevzeti zainteresirane strani, ne pa vlagatelji,
the burden of proof concerning the validity or non-validity of the requested exemptions was put on the stakeholders and not on the applicant,
zahteve po izjemah niso bile javno dostopne, kar Parlamentu otežuje izvajanje učinkovitega nadzora, zlasti pri ugotavljanju upravičenosti ugotovitve iz uvodne izjave 2 osnutka odločbe,
the requests for exemptions have not been made publicly available, which jeopardises Parliament's ability to exercise effective scrutiny, in particular to assess whether the statement in recital 2 of the draft decision is justified,
pri posvetovanju zainteresiranih strani so bili upoštevani stroškovni dejavniki, čeprav jih Direktiva 2002/95/ES ne vsebuje; ker neprimerno posvetovanje o stroških zbuja dvom v podlago za osnutek odločbe,
cost considerations were included in the stakeholder consultation, although Directive 2002/95/EC does not include cost considerations; whereas the undue consultation about costs raises doubts about the basis of the draft decision,
ker so se pri pregledu poročila o oceni upravičenosti zahtev, ki ga je naročila Komisija, pokazale naslednje težave:
whereas scrutiny of the report commissioned by the Commission to assess the validity of the requests revealed the following problems:
stroški se izrecno upoštevajo kot merilo za priznavanje izjem, kar pomeni kršitev določb Direktive 2002/95/ES; ker je zaradi nedovoljenega upoštevanja stroškov vprašljiva veljavnost poročila;
costs are explicitly considered a criterion for granting exemptions, which runs counter to the provisions of Directive 2002/95/EC; whereas the undue consideration about costs calls into question the validity of the report,
glavna razlika med datumi prenehanja veljavnosti, ki so jasen znak za gospodarske subjekte, ter splošno klavzulo o pregledu, ki je po naravi odprta, ni bila razumljena; ker splošne klavzule o pregledu ni mogoče izenačiti z nedvoumnimi datumi prenehanja veljavnosti,
the major difference between expiry dates providing a clear signal to economic operators and a general review clause which is open by nature is not understood; whereas a general review clause cannot be considered to be equal to clear expiry dates,
podatki o trenutno razpoložljivih nadomestnih snoveh niso povsem v skladu s trenutnimi razmerami; ker je zaradi tega vprašljiva veljavnost poročila v zvezi z oceno meril iz člena 5(1)(b),
information about currently available substitutes does not fully reflect the actual situation; whereas this calls into question the validity of the report for assessing the criteria of Article 5(1)(b),
ker so se pri pregledu osnutka odločbe glede na razpoložljive podatke o posvetovanju zainteresiranih strani in poročila, ki ga je naročila Komisija, pokazale naslednje težave zlasti v zvezi z Prilogo k osnutku odločbe:
whereas scrutiny of the draft decision in light of the limited information available from the stakeholder consultation and the report commissioned by the Commission revealed the following problems, in particular with the annex thereto:
predvidene so bile izjeme, čeprav so na voljo nadomestne snovi (točka 7 (druga alinea), 10, 12, 13 in 14), kar je v nasprotju s členom 5(1)(b),
exemptions have been provided where substitutes are available (points 7 (second indent), 10, 12, 13 and 14), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),
ena od izjem je bila razširjena brez posvetovanja zainteresiranimi stranmi (točka 8, kadmij v električnih stikalih), kar je v nasprotju s členom 5(2),
one exemption was extended without any stakeholder consultation (point 8, cadmium in electrical contacts), contrary to Article 5(2),
datum prenehanja veljavnosti za točko 7 (druga alinea), namreč leto 2010, je bil črtan brez utemeljitve,
the expiry date for point 7 (second indent) of 2010 was removed with no justification,
v odločbi niso določeni drugi datumi prenehanja veljavnosti – niti za točko 7 (tretja alinea), kar je v nasprotju z jasnim mandatom točke 10 Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES,
no other expiry dates were set by the decision – not even on point 7 (third indent), contrary to the clear mandate in point 10 of the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC,
datumi prenehanja veljavnosti, ki so jih vlagatelji predlagali za številne točke, niso bili vključeni (točke 10, 11, 13, 14),
expiry dates suggested on a number of items by the applicants themselves have not been included (points 10, 11, 13 and 14),
nekatere izjeme so bile odobrene v obsegu, ki je širši od zahtevanega in/ali upravičenega (točki 10, 12), kar je v nasprotju s členom 5(1)(b),
some exemptions have been given a broader scope than requested and/or justified (points 10 and 12), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),
predvidene so bile izjeme, ki so bile osnovane na neutemeljenih ali nekoličinskih tehničnih razpravah (točka 7 (druga alinea), 10, 14), kar je v nasprotju s členom 5(1)(b),
exemptions have been provided on the basis of unsubstantiated or unquantified technical discussions (points 7 (second indent), 10 and 14), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),
točka 10 Priloge je bila ponovno napačno oštevilčena, čeprav se je Komisija pred tem zavezala, da bo to zaradi zavajajoče razlage direktive, ki ga je povzročilo to oštevilčenje (točka 15), popravila,
the erroneous numbering of point 10 of the Annex was reintroduced, although the Commission had undertaken to rectify it following a misleading interpretation of the Directive due to this numbering (point 15),
ker člen 8 Sklepa 1999/468/ES določa, da ima Parlament pravico sprejeti resolucijo, če želi opozoriti, da osnutek izvedbenih ukrepov "presega izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena v temeljnih aktih",
whereas Article 8 of Decision 1999/468/EC lays down Parliament's right to adopt a resolution to indicate that the draft implementing measures 'would exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instruments',
meni, na podlagi omejenih podatkov, ki jih ima na razpolago, da Komisija ni ravnala v skladu s členi 5(1), 5(1)(b) in 5(2) Direktive 2002/95/ES ter zaradi tega prekoračila izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena z navedeno direktivo;
Considers, on the basis of the limited information available, that the Commission has not acted in accordance with Article 5(1), 5(1)(b) and 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC and has therefore exceeded the implementing powers provided for in that Directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno preuči svoj osnutek Odločbe o spremembi Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES, da bi jo prilagodila tehničnemu napredku ter zagotovi, da bodo vse spremembe Priloge popolnoma usklajene z določbami navedene Direktive;
Calls on the Commission to re-examine its draft decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment in the light of this resolution, and to ensure that any amendment to the Annex fully respects the provisions of that Directive;
potrjuje, da so naknadni pregledi drugih dokumentov o postopku v odboru pokazali, da neupoštevanje Sklepa 1999/468/ES in Sporazuma s strani Komisije v smislu postopkovnih določb ni osamljen primer;
Confirms that subsequent scrutiny of other comitology files has revealed that the Commission's non-compliance with Decision 1999/468/EC and the Agreement in terms of the procedural provisions is not an isolated case;
poziva Komisijo, naj spoštuje pravico Parlamenta do podatkov in nadzora v skladu s Sklepom 1999/468/ES in Sporazumom;
Calls on the Commission to respect Parliament's right to information and scrutiny pursuant to Decision 1999/468/EC and the Agreement;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o nekaterih postopkovnih pravicah v kazenskih postopkih na celotnem območju Evropske unije (KOM(2004)0328 – C6-0071/2004 – 2004/0113(CNS))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union ( COM(2004)0328 – C6-0071/2004 – 2004/0113(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije (KOM(2004)0328) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0328 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 31(1)(c) Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Article 31(1)(c) of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0071/2004 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0071/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0064/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0064/2005 ),
poziva Komisijo, da ustrezno spremeni svoj predlog v skladu s členom 250(2) Pogodbe ES;
Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
poziva Svet, da obvesti Parlament, ali ima namen odstopiti od besedila, ki ga je odobril Parlament;
Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to stališče posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Celotno besedilo
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Entire text
Besede "takoj, ko je mogoče" se nadomesti z "brez nepotrebnega odlašanja".
The words "as soon as possible" to be replaced by "without undue delay"
Sprememba 2 Uvodna izjava 5a (novo)
Amendment 2 Recital 5 a (new)
(5a) Pravice, določene v EKČP, je treba obravnavati kot najnižje standarde, v skladu s katerimi morajo države ravnati v vsakem primeru, prav tako kot morajo ravnati v skladu s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
(5a) The rights laid down in the ECHR should be regarded as minimum standards with which Member States should in any event comply, just as they should comply with the case-law of the European Court on Human Rights.
Sprememba 3 Uvodna izjava 7 (7)
Amendment 3 Recital 7 (7)
Načelo medsebojnega priznavanja temelji na visoki stopnji zaupanja med državami članicami.
The principle of mutual recognition is based on a high level of confidence between Member States.
Sprememba 51 Uvodna izjava 8 (8)
Amendment 51 Recital 8 (8)
Predlagane določbe nimajo namena vplivati na specifične ukrepe, ki so na področju boja proti določenim resnim in kompleksnim oblikam kriminala, točneje terorizma, v veljavi v okviru nacionalnih zakonodaj.
The proposed provisions are not intended to affect specific measures in force in national legislations in the context of the fight against certain serious and complex forms of crime in particular terrorism.
Sprememba 5 Uvodna izjava 10 (10)
Amendment 5 Recital 10 (10)
Pet področij je bilo označenih kot primernih za takojšnjo uvedbo omenjenih skupnih standardov.
Five areas have been identified as appropriate ones in which common standards may be applied in the first instance.
Zaradi spodbujanja medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami bi bilo treba določiti zaščitne ukrepe, ki bodo ščitili temeljne pravice ne le osumljencev, ampak tudi žrtev in prič kaznivih dejanj
In order to promote mutual trust between Member States, safeguards should be put in place to protect the fundamental rights not only of suspected persons, but also of victims of crime and witnesses to crime.
Sprememba 6 Uvodna izjava 10a (novo)
Amendment 6 Recital 10 a (new)
Če je to primerno, ga je treba spremeniti, da se izboljša zaščitne ukrepe, kot so določeni.
If appropriate, it should be amended so as to improve the safeguards laid down.
Sprememba 8 Uvodna izjava 16 (16)
Amendment 8 Recital 16 (16)
Pravica do konzularne pomoči temelji na določbi člena 36 Dunajske konvencije o konzularnih odnosih iz leta 1963, ki pravi, da imajo vsi državljani držav podpisnic pravico do stika s svojim nacionalnim zastopstvom.
The right to consular assistance exists by virtue of Article 36 of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations where it is a right conferred on States to have access to their nationals.
V skladu s tem bo z dolgoročnim oblikovanjem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, kjer bo zaupanje vzajemno med vsemi državami članicami, zmanjšana in na koncu povsem odpravljena potreba po konzularni pomoči.
That said, in the longer term, the creation of an area of freedom, security and justice in which trust is reciprocated between Member States should reduce and ultimately abolish the need for consular assistance.
Sprememba 9 Uvodna izjava 17 (17)
Amendment 9 Recital 17 (17)
Pisno obveščanje osumljencev in obdolžencev o njihovih temeljnih pravicah je ukrep, ki omogoča pošten postopek in v določeni meri zagotavlja, da je vsak, ki je osumljen ali obdolžen kaznivega dejanja, seznanjen s svojimi pravicami.
Notifying suspects and defendants of their basic rights in writing is a measure that improves fairness in proceedings, and goes some way to ensuring that everyone suspected of, or charged with, a criminal offence is aware of their rights.
Pisno obveščanje osumljencev o njihovih pravicah s preprostim "obvestilom o pravicah" bo ta problem odpravilo.
Giving suspects written notification of their rights, by way of a simple "Letter of Rights", will remedy this problem.
Osumljenci, ki so slepi ali slabovidni ali imajo motnje branja, morajo biti ustrezno obveščeni o svojih temeljnih pravicah.
Suspected persons with a visual handicap or reading disabilities should be notified orally of their basic rights.
Sprememba 10 Uvodna izjava 18 (18)
Amendment 10 Recital 18 (18)
Za oceno učinkovitosti tega okvirnega sklepa je potrebno razviti določen mehanizem.
It is necessary to establish a mechanism to assess the effectiveness of this Framework Decision.
To bo povečalo medsebojno zaupanje, saj bo vsaka država članica vedela, da se postopki v drugih državah članicah izvajajo skladno s pravico do poštenega postopka.
This will enhance mutual trust since each Member State will know that other Member States are complying with fair trial rights.
Države članice bodo v ta namen zbirale in shranjevale informacije,
Member States should therefore gather and record information,
vključno z informacijami nevladnih organizacij, medvladnih organizacij in poklicnih združenj odvetnikov, tolmačev in prevajalcev,
including information from NGOs, intergovernmental organisations and the professional bodies of lawyers, interpreters and translators,
za namene vrednotenja in spremljanja.
for the purpose of evaluation and monitoring.
Taki postopki so v nadaljevanju označeni kot "kazenski postopki".
Such proceedings are referred to hereafter as "criminal proceedings".
Sprememba 12 Člen 1, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 12 Article 1, paragraph 2 2.
pristojni organi države članice, pa do
by the competent authorities of a Member State
končne sodbe
finally judged
ali na zastopnika pravne osebe, če je osumljena pravna oseba,
or, where the suspected person is a legal person, to the legal person's representative,
od trenutka, ko so k njej
from the time when he is
pristojni organi države članice, pa do
by the competent authorities of a Member State until
končne sodbe, vključno z izrekanjem kazni in razrešitvijo pritožb.
final judgment, including sentencing and the resolution of any appeal.
Sprememba 13 Člen 1a (novo)
Amendment 13 Article 1 a (new)
(a) "pravna pomoč" pomeni:
(a) "legal advice" means:
– pomoč zagovornika ali druge osebe, ki je za to primerno usposobljena, osumljencu pred in med policijskim zaslišanjem v zvezi s kaznivim dejanjem, za katerega je ta oseba osumljena;
- the assistance provided by a lawyer, or a duly qualified person as referred to in Article 4(1), to a suspected person before and during any police questioning in relation to the offence of which that person is suspected;
– pomoč in zastopstvo osumljenca s strani zagovornika ali druge osebe, ki je za to primerno usposobljena, v celotnem kazenskem postopku;
- the assistance provided to, and the representation of, a suspected person by a lawyer, or a duly qualified person as referred to in Article 4(1), throughout criminal proceedings;
(b) "kazenski postopki" pomenijo:
(b) "criminal proceedings" means:
− postopke za ugotavljanje krivde ali nedolžnosti osumljenca ali za izrekanje kazni tej osebi;
(i) proceedings for establishing the guilt or innocence of a suspected person or for sentencing that person;
− pritožbo na postopke iz prve alinee; ali
(ii) an appeal from proceedings as referred to in point (i), or
− postopke upravnih organov za dejanja, ki so kazniva po zakonodaji države članice in kadar se lahko na podlagi odločitve uvede postopek pred sodiščem, pristojnim zlasti za kazenske zadeve;
(iii) proceedings brought by administrative authorities in respect of acts which are punishable under the law of a Member State, and where the decision may give rise to proceedings before a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters;
(c) "osebe, za katere je odgovoren" pomenijo:
(c) 'persons assimilated to family members" means:
– osebe, ki v skladu z zakoni države članice živijo v registrirani ali na drugačen način zakonsko urejeni istospolni skupnosti z osumljencem;
- persons who, under the law of a Member State, live in a registered or otherwise legalised same-sex partnership with the suspected person,
Sprememba 14 Člen 1b (novo)
Amendment 14 Article 1 b (new)
Preden dajo izjavo ali takoj, ko se uvedejo ukrepi, ki omejujejo njihovo prostost, še preden so dali izjavo, so posamezniki upravičeni, da so s strani pristojnih organov obveščeni o obtožbah proti njim in o razlogih zanje.
Before they make statements or as soon as they are subject to measures which restrict their freedom, whichever is sooner, suspected persons shall be entitled to be informed by the authorities of the charges laid against them and of the grounds for suspicion.
Sprememba 15 Člen 2 1.
Amendment 15 Article 2 1.
Osumljenec ima pravico do
A suspected person
pravne pomoči
shall have
, preden je dolžan odgovarjati na vprašanja v zvezi z
answering questions in relation to the charge
v vseh primerih
in all cases
Sprememba 16 Člen 2, odstavek 2a (novo)
Amendment 16 Article 2, paragraph 2 a (new)
– pogovora s svojim zagovornikom na samem (četudi morajo biti zaradi varnosti v policijskem pridržanju), pri čemer je njihov pogovor z zagovornikom zaupen;
- consult their lawyer in private (even if they are required for security reasons to be kept in police custody), with their conversation with the lawyer to remain entirely confidential;
– dostopa do celotnega gradiva, ki zadeva kazenski postopek, tudi prek posredništva zagovornika;
- have access to all material relating to the criminal proceedings, including through the intermediary of their lawyer;
– zagotovitve, da je njihov zagovornik seznanjen s potekom kazenskega postopka in da je prisoten med zasliševanjem;
- ensure that their lawyer is informed regarding the progress of the criminal proceedings and that he is present during questioning;
– zagotovitve, da je njihov zagovornik prisoten pred sodiščem in da zastavlja vprašanja pred sodiščem v predhodnem postopku in tudi med samim sojenjem.
- ensure that their lawyer is present and that he puts questions to the court, either during the pre-trial stage or during the trial itself.
Sprememba 17 Člen 2, odstavek 2b (novo)
Amendment 17 Article 2, paragraph 2 b (new)
Nespoštovanje pravice do pravne pomoči razveljavi vsa nadaljnja dejanja in na njih temelječa dejanja v kazenskem postopku.
Failure to respect the right to legal advice shall invalidate all subsequent acts and those dependent on them throughout the criminal proceedings.
Sprememba 18 Člen 2, odstavek 2c (novo)
Amendment 18 Article 2, paragraph 2 c (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da ima zagovornik predhodno dostop do celotnega kazenskega spisa za razumno obdobje, da lahko pripravi obrambo.
Member States shall ensure that the lawyer has access to the entire case-file within good enough time to be able to prepare the defence.
Sprememba 19 Člen 3, uvodni del
Amendment 19 Article 3, introductory part