natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija z izvedbenim aktom določi enotne pogoje, pod katerimi lahko Grčija spremeni namembnost sredstev, ki se dodelijo vsako leto za različne proizvode, deležne ugodnosti posebnega režima preskrbe.
The Commission shall establish by implementing act the uniform conditions under which Greece may amend the allocation of resources allocated each year to the various products benefiting from the specific supply arrangements.
Komisija sprejme izvedbene akte, s katerimi določi enotne podrobne določbe, v skladu s katerimi lahko Grčija spremeni namembnost sredstev, ki se dodelijo vsako leto za različne proizvode, deležne ugodnosti posebnega režima preskrbe.
The Commission shall adopt implementing act s the uniform detailed provisions in accordance with which Greece may amend the allocation of resources allocated each year to the various products benefiting from the specific supply arrangements.
Pooblastila Komisije
Commission powers
Kadar so na Komisijo prenesena pooblastila, Komisija pri delegiranih aktih ravna v skladu s postopkom iz člena 22, pri izvedbenih aktih pa v skladu s postopkom iz člena 25.
When powers are granted to the Commission, it shall act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22, in the case of delegated acts, and in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 25, in the case of implementing acts.
Sklicevanje na člen 22 in 25 je vključeno že v standardnih določbah v prejšnjih členih o delegiranih in izvedbenih aktih.
The reference to Articles 22 and 25 is already included in the 'Standardised Provisions' used in previous articles for delegated and implementing acts.
Pooblastila za sprejetje delegiranih aktov iz te uredbe se za nedoločen čas podelijo Komisiji .
The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in this Regulation shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time .
Pooblastilo za sprejetje delegiranih aktov je preneseno na Komisijo pod pogoji, določenimi v tem členu .
The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article .
Ko Komisija sprejme delegirani akt, o tem hkrati obvesti Evropski parlament in Svet.
As soon as it adopts a delegated act, the Commission shall provide simultaneous notification thereof to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz členov 6(3), 11(2), 13(3), 14(2), 15(4) in 18(4) se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od ...*.
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article s 6 (3) , 11 (2) , 13 (3) , 14 (2) , 15(4) and 18(4) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of 5 years from …*.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenesenem pooblastilu najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja.
The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power not later than nine months before the end of the five-year period.
Prenos pooblastila se samodejno podaljša za enaka obdobja, razen če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotuje temu podaljšanju najpozneje tri mesece pred koncem vsakega obdobja .
The delegation of power shall be tacitly extended for periods of an identical duration, unless the European Parliament or the Council opposes such extension not later than three months before the end of each period.
Komisiji se pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov podeli v skladu s pogoji iz členov 23 in 24 .
The power to adopt delegated acts shall be conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 23 and 24.
Pooblastilo iz členov 6(3), 11(2), 13(3), 14(2), 15(4) in 18(4) lahko kadarkoli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet .
The delegation of power referred to in Articles 6(3), 11(2), 13(3), 14(2) , 15(4) and 18(4) may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Z odločitvijo o preklicu preneha veljati prenos pooblastila, naveden v tej odločitvi.
A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision.
Odločitev začne učinkovati dan po njeni objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ali na poznejši datum, ki je v njej določen.
It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein.
Delegirani akt, sprejet v skladu s členi 6(3), 11(2), 13(3), 14(2), 15(4) in 18(4), začne veljati le, če niti Evropski parlament niti Svet ne nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu v roku dveh mesecev od uradnega obvestila Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o tem aktu, ali če sta pred iztekom navedenega roka tako Evropski parlament kot Svet obvestila Komisijo, da ne bosta nasprotovala.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 6(3), 11(2), 13(3), 14(2 ), 15(4) and 18(4 ) shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
Ta rok se na pobudo Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta podaljša za dva meseca.
That period shall be extended by two months at the initiative of the European Parliament or of the Council.
Datum začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Date of entry into force of this Regulation
Preklic pooblastila
Revocation of delegation
Evropski parlament ali Svet lahko kadar koli prekličeta pooblastilo iz člena 22(1).
The delegation of power referred to in Article 22, paragraph 1 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek, da bi se odločila, ali namerava preklicati prenos pooblastila, o tem obvesti drugega zakonodajalca in Komisijo najpozneje mesec pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri čemer navede prenesena pooblastila, ki bodo morebiti preklicana, ter razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall inform the other legislator and the Commission at the latest one month before the final decision is taken, stating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and the reasons for a revocation.
Odločitev začne veljati takoj ali na dan, določen v navedeni odločitvi.
It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein.
Ne vpliva na veljavnost že veljavnih delegiranih aktov.
It shall not affect the validity of the delegated acts already in force.
Zajeto v členu 22.
Covered by Article 22.
Nasprotovanje zoper delegirane akte
Objections to delegated acts
Evropski parlament in Svet lahko ugovarjata zoper delegirani akt v dveh mesecih od dne, ko sta bila o njem obveščena.
The European Parliament or the Council may object to the delegated act within a period of two months from the date of notification.
Če do izteka tega roka zoper delegirani akt ne ugovarja ne Evropski parlament ne Svet ali če sta pred tem dnem Evropski parlament in Svet obvestila Komisijo o odločitvi, da zoper delegirani akt ne bosta ugovarjala, začne delegirani akt veljati z dnem, predvidenim v njegovih določbah.
If, on expiry of that period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, or if, before that date, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they have decided not to raise objections, the delegated act shall enter into force at the date stated in its provisions.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet ugovarja zoper delegirani akt, akt ne začne veljati.
If the European Parliament or the Council objects to a delegated act, it shall not enter into force.
Izvedbeni akt – odbor
Implementing acts - committee
Komisiji pomaga odbor za neposredna plačila, ustanovljen na podlagi člena 141 Uredbe (ES) št. 73/2009.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Management Committee for Direct Payments established under Article 141 of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009.
Ta odbor je odbor v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011.
That c ommittee shall be a c ommittee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No. 182/2011.
Če so izvedbeni akti sprejeti na podlagi te uredbe, se uporablja člen [5] Uredbe (EU) št. [xxxx/yyyy] (dopolniti po sprejetju uredbe iz člena 291(3) PDEU o pravilih nadzora, o kateri trenutno poteka razprava v Evropskem parlamentu in Svetu) (postopek pregleda) .
When implementing acts are adopted pursuant to this Regulation, Article [5] of Regulation (EU) No. [xxxx/yyyy] (to be completed following the adoption of the regulation on control mechanisms, as referred to in Article 291(3) of the TFEU, currently the subject of discussion by the European Parliament and the Council) shall apply (examination procedure).
Pri sklicevanju na ta odstavek se uporablja člen 5 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 .
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No. 182/2011 shall apply.
Uporabi se besedilo standardnih določb za izvedbene akte, o katerih so se dogovorile institucije.
The wording of the 'Standardised Provisions' agreed on between the institutions regarding implementing acts shall be used.
Regulativni okvir in kratko zgodovinsko ozadje
Regulatory framework and brief historical background
Po členu 174 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije je krepitev ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije Unije bistvenega pomena za spodbujanje njenega skladnega in uravnoteženega razvoja.
Under Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) the strengthening of the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union is of major importance in promoting its harmonious and balanced development.
Člen navaja, da si Unija prizadeva zmanjšati neskladje med stopnjami razvitosti različnih regij in zaostalost regij z najbolj omejenimi možnostmi, zlasti otokov ter čezmejnih in gorskih regij.
The article states that the Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions, in particular island, cross-border and mountain regions.
V letih 1989 in 1991 je Svet sprejel programe možnosti za oddaljene in otoške regije, znane kot POSEI.
In 1989 and 1991 the Council adopted 'Programmes of Options Specifically Relating to Remoteness and Insularity' known as POSEI.
Leta 1993 je bil sprejet podoben program, ki je zajemal manjše egejske otoke.
In 1993 a similar programme was adopted covering the smaller Aegean islands.
Komisija je na osnovi sklepov Evropskega sveta iz decembra 1988 na Rodosu oblikovala akcijski program zaradi posebnih pogojev, ki jih ustvarjata teritorialna razpršenost ter oddaljenost in izoliranost egejskih otokov.
Acting on the conclusions of the European Council of December 1988 held in Rhodes, the Commission drew up a programme of action in the light of the specific conditions created by the territorial dispersion and the remote and isolated nature of the Aegean islands.
Skupnost manjše egejske otoke podpira predvsem s posebnimi ukrepi za spodbujanje proizvodnje, predelave in trženja nekaterih kmetijskih proizvodov ter za preskrbo otokov s surovinami.
Community support for the 'smaller Aegean islands' basically involves specific measures to promote the production, processing and marketing of certain agricultural products and to supply the islands with raw materials.
Ker Pogodbe egejskih otokov ne priznavajo kot najbolj oddaljeno regijo, je bil z ločenim regulativnim ukrepom sprejet poseben režim, po katerem se odobrena proračunska sredstva črpajo iz istega sklada kot za POSEI, to je Evropskega kmetijskega jamstvenega sklada/Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, ukrepi pa načrtujejo in izvajajo na isti osnovi in v istem okviru.
Since the Aegean islands were not recognised under the Treaties as outermost regions, special arrangements were adopted under a separate regulatory measure, appropriations being drawn from the same fund as for the POSEI, that is to say the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund/European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, while measures are planned and implemented on the same basis and within the same framework.
Pravna podlaga za predlog Komisije za uredbo o manjših egejskih otokih je člen 42, ki navaja, da „Svet lahko na predlog Komisije odobri dodelitev pomoči: (a) za zaščito podjetij, ki so zaradi strukturnih ali naravnih razmer v slabšem položaju ...”.
The legal basis for the Commission's proposal for a regulation on small Aegean islands is Article 42 which states that ‘the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise the granting of aid: (a) for the protection of enterprises handicapped by structural or natural conditions ...’
Predlog obravnavane uredbe pomeni nadaljnjo prilagoditev režimu, ki je bil uveden leta 1993 in nato večkrat spremenjen, nazadnje leta 2006 (Uredba 1405/2006).
The proposal for a regulation under examination constitutes a further adjustment to the arrangements introduced in 1993 and subsequently modified a number of times, most recently in 2006 (Regulation 1405/2006).
Komisija je predlog sprejela po načelu subsidiarnosti, da bi spodbudila udeležbo pri odločanju o sprejetju in izvajanju režima.
Under the principle of subsidiarity, the Commission adopted the proposal seeking to encourage participation in decision making for adoption and implementation of the arrangements.
Zato so grški organi odgovorni za oblikovanje programa podpore in njegovo predložitev Komisiji v odobritev.
The Greek authorities are accordingly responsible for drawing up the support programme and submitting it to the Commission for approval.
V skladu s trenutnimi potrebami otokov lahko predlagajo tudi njegove spremembe.
They are also able to propose changes thereto in line with the current requirements of the islands.
Posebne razmere na egejskih otokih
Particular circumstances on the Aegean islands
Poročevalec meni, da je veliko število manjših egejskih otokov velik izziv za politiko teritorialne kohezije, kot je bila sprva zasnovana v zakonodaji EU in vključena v ekonomsko in socialno kohezijsko politiko.
The rapporteur takes the view that the plethora of small Aegean islands is a major challenge to the policy of territorial cohesion as originally conceived under EU law and embodied in economic and social cohesion policy.
Sistematično in dosledno navajanje posebnih teritorialnih značilnosti različnih podenot EU in njihov vpliv na družbenoekonomski in ekološki razvoj bi morala priti do izraza v jasnem okviru za vzpostavitev potrebnih ciljev in oblikovanje primernih politik.
The systematic and consistent reference to the special territorial characteristics of various EU sub-units and the implications thereof for their socio-economic and ecological development should be reflected in a clear framework for establishment of the required objectives and the formulation of suitable policies.
Pri načrtovanju to pomeni operacijsko interoperabilnost posameznih teritorialnih enot in ukrepov za premostitev vrzeli med njimi ter povečanje njihove dostopnosti.
In planning terms this means operational interoperability between individual territorial units and measures to bridge the gap between them and make them more accessible.
Ukrepi za povečanje relativnih prednosti posamezne regije in po potrebi večja specializacija v ekonomskem, socialnem in okoljskem pomenu ter premoščanje slabosti so pogoj za ohranitev teritorialne raznolikosti in večjo kohezijo.
Action to enhance the relative advantages of each region and, where appropriate, achieve greater specialisation in economic, social and environmental terms, as well as overcoming disadvantages, is a precondition for the conservation of territorial diversity and greater cohesion.
Poleg tega funkcionalne razlike med teritorialnimi enotami EU pomenijo, da so interaktivne, medsebojno odvisne in se dopolnjujejo.
Furthermore, the functional differences between EU territorial units mean that they are interactive, interdependent and complementary.
Njihov razvoj ni vedno predvidljiv, saj ima vsaka svoj sistem delitve dela in specializacije ter svoje povezave z drugimi teritorialnimi enotami.
They do not always follow a predicable course, each having its own system of work sharing and specialisation and its own links with other territorial units.
Razpršenost otokov in njihov položaj glede na druge otoke v arhipelagu ovirata preskrbo in trgovino, zaradi česar so prevozni stroški precej višji.
The dispersal of the islands and their position in relation to each other within the archipelago is an obstacle to supply and trade, resulting in greatly increased transport costs.
Obstoječe prometne mreže ne zadoščajo in so ogrožene zaradi strukturnih šibkosti (stare flote, drage voznine), ki povzročajo „dvojno otoško lego”, saj se manjši otoki preskrbujejo z drugih otokov na bolj osrednjih legah.
Existing transport networks are inadequate and undermined by structural weaknesses (ageing fleets, high fares) resulting in 'dual insularity', the smaller islands being supplied from other more central islands.
Omejena velikost, premajhna notranja in zunanja dostopnost, upad in staranje prebivalstva, pomanjkanje osnovnih dobrin in javnih storitev (voda, elektrika, ogrevanje) ter geofizikalni in podnebni pogoji (skalna tla, razpršene kmetije, suša in močni vetrovi), vse to ločuje egejske otoke.
Limited size, lack of accessibility both within and without, declining and ageing populations, lack of basic commodities and public services (water, electricity, heating) and geophysical and climatic conditions (rocky soil, scattered farms, drought and high winds) are what set the Aegean islands apart.
Poleg tega se nahajajo na zunanjih mejah EU.
They are also situated on the EU's external borders.
Izredno težavnim pogojem kmetovanja na manjših egejskih otokih se pridružujejo zunanji pritiski, ki so posledica (nezakonitega) preseljevanja.
The particularly difficult farming conditions on the smaller Aegean islands are being compounded by external pressures as a result of (illegal) migration.
Predlog Komisije za uredbo
The Commission's proposal for a regulation
Zaradi zaporednih sprememb obstoječe ureditve, razvoja zakonodaje EU, izkušenj pri izvajanju v praksi in novega regulativnega okvira, ki je bil vzpostavljen z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, je treba nekatere določbe preoblikovati in prestrukturirati predlog.
Successive amendments to the existing regulation, the development of EU law, experience gained from the implementation thereof in practice and the new regulatory framework established following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty all make it necessary to reformulate certain provisions and restructure the proposal.
Predlog Komisije je eden od ukrepov, ki je bil uveden zaradi posodobitve zakonodaje ES/EU glede na spremembe, ki jih je uvedla Lizbonska pogodba.
The Commission proposal is one of the measures being introduced with a view to updating EC/EU legislation following the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty.
Konkretno to pomeni uskladitev številnih določb iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1405/2006 z določbami novih členov 290 (delegirani akti) in 291 (izvedbeni akti) Pogodbe o delovanju EU.
Specifically, a number of provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1405/2006 are brought into line with the provisions of the new Articles 290 (delegated acts) and 291 (implementing acts) of the TFEU.
Predlog Komisije ne predvideva uvedbe večjih sprememb.
The Commission proposal is not seeking to introduce major changes.
Pričakuje se, da bo Komisija leta 2011 pripravila poročilo o učinku dosedanjih posebnih ukrepov in priporočila njihove vsebinske spremembe.
It is expected to produce a report in 2011 on the impact of special measures to date and recommend amendments to the substance thereof.
Predlagane spremembe besedila pojasnjujejo cilje uredbe in so namenjene prestrukturiranju zakonodajnega besedila zaradi izvajanja.
The proposed rewording clarifies the objectives of the regulation and seeks to restructure the text of the legislation for implementation purposes.
Posebej je treba omeniti predlog Komisije, naj se v posebnem režimu preskrbe povečajo proračunske odobritve za Grčijo za 20 %.
A special mention should be made of the Commission proposal to increase by 20% budget appropriations for Greece under the special supply arrangements.
V skladu z ugotovitvami iz poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o posebnih ukrepih za najbolj oddaljene regije in manjše egejske otoke (Posebno poročilo 10/2010) Komisija priznava, da se je potreba po osnovnih dobrinah od leta 2007 povečala zaradi razvoja živinorejskega sektorja in demografskega pritiska.
In accordance with the findings of the report by the European Court of Auditors regarding special measures for the outermost regions and smaller Aegean islands (Special Report 10/2010), the Commission recognises that there has since 2007 been an increased need for basic commodities because of developments in the livestock sector and demographic pressures.
S povečanjem, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, se ne bi povečal skupni proračun, ki bi glede na prejšnja leta ostal nespremenjen.
The increase proposed by the Commission does not involve an increase in the total budget, which remains the same as in previous years.
Ne glede na svoje prednosti pa predlog vsebuje tudi nekaj slabih strani, kot je zmanjšanje sredstev, ki so bila določena za posebne ukrepe kmetijske podpore.
Notwithstanding the advantages of this proposal, it may also have substantial drawbacks, involving deductions from funding previously earmarked for special agricultural support measures
V oceni finančnih posledic k predlogu so sredstva vključena v proračunski vrstici v prvem stebru (neposredna pomoč) skupne kmetijske politike (Evropski kmetijski jamstveni sklad).
In the financial statement accompanying the proposal funding is entered under two budget headings in the first pillar (direct aid) of the common agricultural policy (European Agricultural Guarantee Fund).
Poročevalec posebej resno obravnava ugotovitve Evropskega računskega sodišča glede izvajanja v praksi in skupne učinkovitosti ukrepa.
The rapporteur takes the observations of the European Court of Auditors particularly seriously regarding implementation in practice and the overall effectiveness of the measure.
Akcijski program za Grčijo mora odražati ekonomsko analizo potreb kmetovanja na egejskih otokih in zagotoviti skupno strategijo, ki bo jasno določala razmerje med posameznimi predlaganimi ukrepi in skupnimi cilji ter načrtovani učinek.
The programme of action for Greece must reflect the economic analysis of the needs of farming in the Aegean islands, providing overall strategy which clearly establishes the relationship between the various measures proposed and the overall objectives and the intended effect.
Kmetijstvo, kot ga dojemamo danes, je neločljivo povezano s trajnostnim ekonomskim, socialnim in ekološkim razvojem.
Agriculture as perceived today is inextricably linked with sustainable economic, social and ecological development.
Na egejskih otokih je potrebno táko kmetijstvo, da lokalno gospodarstvo ne bi postalo preveč odvisno od svojega glavnega vira dohodka, turizma, ampak bi se namesto tega osredotočilo na ohranjanje dragocenih naravnih in kulturnih virov.
Agriculture in the Aegean islands must be carried out in such a way as to ensure that the local economy does not become excessively dependent on its principal source of revenue, tourism, concentrating instead on conserving valuable natural and cultural resources.
Predlog Komisije, ki določa specifične ukrepe v prid kmetijstvu na manjših egejskih otokih, pa si bolj prizadeva na novo izraziti obstoječo uredbo, namesto da bi jo spreminjal.
However, the Commission proposal laying down specific measures in favour of agriculture in the smaller Aegean islands seeks to reword rather than amend the existing regulation.
Vsi predlogi Evropskega parlamenta morajo upoštevati področje uporabe režima, za katerega se sredstva vključijo v prvi steber skupne kmetijske politike.
Any proposals by the European Parliament must take into account the regulatory scope of the arrangements, for which funding is entered under the first pillar of the CAP.