natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obsoja maltuziansko politiko Evropske komisije, zaradi katere postajamo vedno bolj odvisni od tujine za zagotavljanje našega gospodarskega razvoja in varnosti hrane ali energetske varnosti;
Condemns the European Commission’s Malthusian policies, which makes us increasingly dependent on the world beyond Europe for our economic development and security of food and energy supply;
ponovno poudarja preferenčno načelo Skupnosti kot eno od bistvenih načel evropske solidarnosti in osveščanja Evropejcev o njihovi pripadnosti istemu zemljepisnemu območju, ki ga tvorijo suvereni narodi;
Reaffirms the principle of Community preference as one of the essential principles of European solidarity and of the necessary realisation by Europeans that they belong to a single geographical ensemble made up of sovereign Nations;
meni, da so javne storitve del kulture nekaterih držav članic in da jih je zato treba varovati in modernizirati, ne pa izpostavljati konkurenci, kot to počne Evropska komisija, ki je varuhinja splošnih interesov;
Takes the view that the public services are part of the culture of some Member States and, this being case, that they must be defended and modernised and cannot be opened to competition by the European Commission, which is the guardian of the public interest;
meni, da bi morala biti varnost hrane in zdravja ena od prednostnih nalog nemškega predsedstva, zlasti zaradi vrnitve virusa ptičje gripe H5N1;
Takes the view that food safety and health protection should be one of the German Presidency’s priorities, particularly with the return of the H5N1 virus and avian flu;
je začuden, da niti Komisija niti Svet ne obsojata selitve podjetij ali njihovih sedežev izven Evropske unije, kar ogroža na tisoče delovnih mest v regijah, ki jih je brezposelnost že tako prizadela, in zaradi česar so države prikrajšane za znatne davčne prilive;
Is surprised that neither the Commission nor the Council expresses opposition to relocation outside the European Union of businesses and company headquarters, which endangers thousands of jobs in regions already hit by unemployment and deprives the States of substantial tax revenue;
meni, da nadaljevanje pogajanj v STO, zlasti kroga iz Dohe, ni mogoče doseči pod katerimi koli pogoji in da skupna kmetijska politika v nobenem primeru ne more biti spremenljivka za prilagoditev kateremu koli sporazumu z Združenimi državami in državami v vzponu;
Takes the view that the relaunch of the WTO and the Doha Round cannot take place at just any price, and that whatever happens the CAP must not be used as an adjustment variable for any agreement with the United Staes and the emerging nations;
ostro obsoja vsakršen poskus Sveta, da bi kritiziral neposredno obdavčevanje, ki je suverena pristojnost držav, vključno z davki na dobiček podjetij;
Vigorously opposes any attempt by the Council to attack direct taxation, a sovereign prerogative of the States, in any form whatsoever, including taxes on companies;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu in državam članicam.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States.
ki ga vlagajo Bruno Gollnisch, Philip Claeys in Petre Popeangă
by Bruno Gollnisch, Philip Claeys and Petre Popeangă
o evro-sredozemskih odnosih
on Euro-Mediterranean relations
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o evro-sredozemskih odnosih
European Parliament resolution on Euro-Mediterranean relations
ker so se razmere na Bližnjem vzhodu poslabšale, predvsem zaradi:
whereas the situation in the Middle East has deteriorated, with, in particular:
– poostritve izraelsko-palestinskega spora,
– a worsening of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,
– razširitve tega spora na Libanon julija 2006,
– the extension of the conflict to Lebanon in July 2006,
– izbruha palestinske državljanske vojne med pripadniki Fate in Hamasa,
– the escalation of the civil war between Palestinians supporting Fatah and those supporting Hamas,
– političnega pat položaja v Libanonu med opozicijo in vlado, ki je bila izvoljena na svobodnih volitvah 2005,
– a political stalemate in Lebanon between the opposition and the government formed following the free elections in 2005,
ker so islamska politična gibanja v vzponu,
whereas Islamist political movements are on the rise,
ker obsoja preganjanje krščanskih skupnosti, zlasti v Egiptu,
condemning the persecution of Christian communities, particularly in Egypt,
ker Turčija ne želi priznati Cipra,
deploring Turkey's refusal to recognise Cyprus,
ker so se gospodarske razmere v državah na jugu in vzhodu Sredozemlja le malo izboljšale;
whereas there has been little improvement in the economic situation in southern and eastern Mediterranean countries,
ker je priseljevanje z južne obale Sredozemlja veliko breme za evropsko družbo, ki meni, da to ogroža njeno identiteto, a tudi za mlade izkoreninjene priseljence in njihove države, ki s tem izgubljajo del mladega prebivalstva;
whereas immigration from southern Mediterranean countries is a dramatic problem for European societies, whose identities are threatened, but also for the uprooted immigrants themselves and for their countries, which are losing part of their younger generation in this process,
ugotavlja, da evro-sredozemsko partnerstvo, sklenjeno na barcelonski konferenci 1995 s ciljem oblikovati območje miru in blaginje, ni uspelo;
Noting the failure of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership formed as a result of the Barcelona Conference in 1995, the aim of which was to establish an area of peace and prosperity;
meni, da so pogoji za zagotovitev trajnega miru na Bližnjem vzhodu vzpostavitev varnih in priznanih meja za Izrael ter države za Palestince, pa tudi spoštovanje politične neodvisnosti Libanona;
Considers that lasting peace in the Middle East calls for secure, recognised borders for Israel, a state for the Palestinians and respect for Lebanese sovereignty;
predlaga novo obliko evro-sredozemskega sodelovanja, ki bo temeljilo ne le na pomoči, temveč tudi na dejanskem partnerstvu, ki bo državljanom južnosredozemskih držav z ustvarjanjem blaginje in delovnih mest omogočilo življenje in delo v lastni državi;
Proposes that a new form of Euro-Mediterranean cooperation be established, based not just on assistance but also on a genuine partnership that will create wealth and jobs in southern Mediterranean countries and thus enable their nationals to live and work in their home countries;
o družbi SWIFT, sporazumu PNR in čezatlantskem dialogu o teh vprašanjih
on SWIFT, the PNR agreement and the transatlantic dialogue on these issues
ob upoštevanju izjav Sveta in Komisije med razpravo 31. januarja 2007 po vprašanju za ustni odgovor glede družbe SWIFT ter glede pogajanj o novem sporazumu med EU in ZDA o evidenci imen letalskih potnikov (PNR),
having regard to the declarations of the Council and the Commission during the debate of 31 January 2007, following the oral question on SWIFT as well as the negotiations for a new EU-US PNR (passenger name record) agreement,
ob upoštevanju odgovora Evropske centralne banke na vprašanje, ki se je nanašalo na to, da ni obvestila centralnih bank in posledično nacionalnih bank o ravnanju ZDA, po katerem te dostopajo do podatkov, povezanih s finančnimi transakcijami, ki jih ustvarja SWIFT,
having regard to the reply by the European Central Bank to the question put to it, which raised the point that the ECB had failed to inform the central banks, and as a result the national banks, of the US practice of accessing data related to financial transactions generated by SWIFT,
ob upoštevanju mnenj delovne skupine iz člena 29 o prihodnjem sporazumu PNR in evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov o vlogi ECB v zadevi SWIFT,
having regard to the opinion of the Article 29 Working Party on the future PNR agreement and of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) as regards the role of the ECB in the SWIFT case,
ker je izmenjava podatkov in informacij pomembno orodje v mednarodnem boju proti terorizmu in z njim povezanemu kriminalu,
whereas the sharing of data and information is a valuable tool in the international fight against terrorism and related crime,
ker so podjetja, ki poslujejo na obeh straneh Atlantika, vedno pogosteje ujeta med nasprotujoče si pravne zahteve iz pristojnosti ZDA in EU,
whereas businesses with operations on both sides of the Atlantic increasingly find themselves caught between the conflicting legal requirements of the US and EU jurisdictions,
ker mora izmenjava osebnih podatkov potekati na ustrezni pravni podlagi, ki je povezana z jasnimi pravili in pogoji, urejati pa jo mora tudi ustrezno varstvo zasebnosti in državljanskih svoboščin posameznih državljanov,
whereas the sharing of personal data must take place on a proper legal basis, linked to clear rules and conditions, and must be covered by adequate protection of the privacy and civil liberties of individual citizens,
ker mora imeti boj proti terorizmu in kriminalu primerno demokratično legitimnost, kar pomeni, da se mora nenehno izvajati parlamentarni nadzor in sodno preverjanje programov za izmenjavo podatkov,
whereas the fight against terrorism and crime must have proper democratic legitimacy, meaning that data-sharing programmes must at all times be subject to parliamentary scrutiny and judicial review;
poudarja, da je v zadnjih nekaj letih več sporazumov, ki so nastali zaradi zahtev ZDA in so bili sprejeti brez kakršnegakoli sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta – zlasti sporazumi o PNR, SWIFT in obstoj ameriškega sistema ATS ( Automated Targeting System ) –, vodilo v razmere pravne negotovosti, kar zadeva potrebna jamstva o varstvu podatkov pri izmenjavi in prenosu podatkov med EU in ZDA za namene zagotavljanja javne varnosti ter še posebej za preprečevanje terorizma in boj proti njemu;
Stresses that during the last few years several agreements prompted by US requirements and adopted without any involvement of the European Parliament, notably the agreements on PNR, SWIFT and the existence of the US Automated Targeting System (ATS), have led to a situation of legal uncertainty with regard to the necessary data protection guarantees for data sharing and transfer between the EU and the US for the purposes of ensuring public security and, in particular, preventing and fighting terrorism;
ponovno poudarja, da rešitve, ki so jih doslej predvideli Svet in Komisija ter zasebna podjetja, ne varujejo ustrezno osebnih podatkov državljanov EU (kar ugotavlja tudi Peter Schaar, predsednik delovne skupine iz člena 29, v svojem pismu o novem prehodnem sporazumu PNR) ter da bi to lahko predstavljalo kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalnih zakonodaj kot v primeru SWIFT (glej mnenji delovne skupine iz člena 29 in evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov);
Reaffirms that the solutions envisaged so far by the Council and the Commission as well as by private companies do not adequately protect the personal data of EU citizens (as also noted in the letter from Mr Schaar, Chair of the Article 29 Working Party, regarding the new interim PNR agreement), and that this could constitute to a violation of Community as well as national legislation, as in the SWIFT case (see the opinion of the Article 29 Working Party and the EDPS);
opozarja, da je v boju proti terorizmu kongres ZDA od administracije ZDA dolgo časa zahteval sprejetje bolj ciljno naravnanih ukrepov, ki bi bolje varovali zasebnost in nad katerimi bi se izvajal parlamentarni in sodni nadzor (enaka zahteva je bila postavljena, ko se je kongres seznanil z obstojem programa Nacionalne varnostne agencije za prisluškovanje telefonskim pogovorom);
Notes that in the fight against terrorism the US Congress has for some time asked the US administration to adopt more targeted measures that better ensure privacy and are subject to parliamentary and judicial control (as was demanded when Congress was made aware of the existence of the NSA programme of telephone tapping);
potrjuje svojo zadržanost, s katero je nedavno soglašal kongres, do načina profiliranja in zbiranja podatkov, za katerega je značilno vsesplošno kopičenje vedno večjega obsega osebnih podatkov, kot se dogaja v primeru sistema ATS, ki ga uporablja administracija ZDA;
Confirms its reservations that have recently been shared by the Congress as regards the method of profiling and data mining, which consists in accumulating in an indiscriminate manner larger and larger volumes of personal data, as in the case of the ATS used by the US administration;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je administracija ZDA nedavno seznanila s temi zadržki in da bo poskušala izboljšati položaj z naslednjimi ukrepi:
Welcomes the fact that the US administration has recently taken note of these reservations and that it will seek to improve the situation with the following steps:
(a) imenovanje uradnikov za zasebnost in/ali oblikovanje neodvisne agencije za zasebnost v okviru zvezne uprave, ki naj bi ocenjevali vpliv na zasebnost vseh pobud, katere bi utegnile kršiti zasebnost;
(a) the establishment of privacy officers and/or an independent privacy agency within the federal administration, who are to undertake privacy assessments of all initiatives that could potentially impinge on privacy;
(b) vzpostavitev mehanizma, da se državljanom ZDA zagotovi pravica do pritožbe v primeru nepravilne uporabe njihovih podatkov;
(b) setting up a mechanism to guarantee US citizens a right of appeal in the event of incorrect use of their data;
vendar verjame, da so te izboljšave nezadostne, kar zadeva varstvo podatkov za državljane EU, in da bi bilo zelo dobrodošlo, če bi zakon o zasebnosti iz leta 1974 na podlagi vzajemnosti lahko veljal tudi za državljane EU, da bil ti lahko dostopali do svojih podatkov, jih tudi popravljali in spreminjali, ter bi imeli dostop do pravnega mehanizma za odškodovanje in do neodvisnega organa za varstvo podatkov;
Believes, however, that these improvements are insufficient as regards data protection for EU citizens and that it would be warmly welcomed if the 1974 Privacy Act could also apply to EU citizens on a reciprocity basis in order for them to have access to their data, including rectification and modification, as well as having access to a legal redress mechanism and to an independent data protection authority;
opozarja na svoje prepričanje, da bi takšna varnostna jamstva olajšala izmenjavo podatkov in obenem zagotavljala varstvo zasebnosti ter da bi morali takšni prenosi v vsakem primeru temeljiti na enem ali več mednarodnih sporazumih, ki bi bili po strukturi podobni sporazumu o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in izročitvah med EU in ZDA, katerega trenutno preučuje kongres ZDA;
Recalls its belief that such data protection guarantees would facilitate data sharing whilst ensuring protection of privacy, and that such transfers would in any case need to be based on one or more international agreements similar in structure to that of the EU/US agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and extradition which is currently being examined by the US Congress;
verjame, da bi morali biti Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti ter kongres ZDA pri tem celovito vključeni, saj se tovrstni mednarodni sporazumi nanašajo na temeljne pravice tako državljanov EU kot tudi ZDA;
Believes that since such international agreements concern the fundamental rights of EU as well as US citizens, the European Parliament and the national parliaments of the Member States should be fully involved, as should the US Congress;
vztraja, da bi si morali na področju varovanja podatkov s sporazumi prizadevati, da se doseže visoka stopnja varstva podatkov, zaradi tveganja zlorab, in bi jih morala spremljati obvezujoča načela na ravni EU o varstvu podatkov za varnostne namene (tretji steber);
Insists that in matters of data protection the agreements should strive to achieve a high level of protection as regards risks of abuse and should be supplemented with binding principles at EU level as regards the protection of data for security purposes (third pillar);
poudarja potrebo po sprejetju okvirnega sklepa o varstvu osebnih podatkov v tretjem stebru; opozarja na dejstvo, da je v mnenju, ki ga je soglasno sprejel 27. septembra 2006, pozval k oblikovanju celovitega in ambicioznega področja, s katerim bi se poskrbelo za pravila o varstvu podatkov, ki bi urejala tudi izmenjavo osebnih podatkov s tretjimi državami;
Stresses the need for the adoption of a Framework Decision on the protection of personal data in the third pillar; draws attention to the fact that, in the opinion it adopted unanimously on 27 September 2006, it called for a comprehensive and ambitious scope which would provide for data protection rules also covering the exchange of personal data with third countries;
verjame, da je treba z ZDA opredeliti skupen in enoten okvir, s katerim bi se zavarovale obveze, ki so potrebne v posebnem partnerstvu med EU in ZDA v boju proti terorizmu, in v katerem bi se lahko obravnavali tudi vsi vidiki, ki zadevajo prosto gibanje oseb med EU in ZDA;
Believes that it is necessary to define with the US a common and shared framework to safeguard the necessary guarantees that are needed in the special EU-US partnership in the fight against terrorism, which could also deal with all aspects concerning the free movement of persons between the EU and the US;
pričakuje, da bo na naslednjem vrhunskem srečanju EU-ZDA 30. aprila 2007 prišlo do razprave o tej strategiji čezatlantskega partnerstva, in meni, da je treba v tej luči okrepiti stike med Evropskim parlamentom in kongresom; zahteva, da:
Expects that this strategy of transatlantic partnership will be discussed at the next EU-US summit on 30 April 2007 and considers that, in this perspective, contacts should be strengthened between the European Parliament and Congress; requests that:
(a) se poročevalcem Evropskega parlamenta dovoli, da so prisotni na predstavitvi o temah, ki so v skupnem interesu (sporazum o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in izročitvah med EU in ZDA, ATS, SWIFT), v kongresu ZDA;
(a) rapporteurs from the European Parliament be allowed to attend a hearing in the US Congress on themes that are of mutual interest (the EU-US agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and extradition, ATS, SWIFT);
(b) se predsednike pristojnih odborov kongresa povabi pred naslednjim čezatlantskim dialogom (Bruselj-Berlin sredi aprila 2007) in v vsakem primeru pred naslednjim spomladanskim vrhunskim srečanjem EU-ZDA;
(b) the Chairs of the competent Congress committees be invited with a view to the next transatlantic dialogue (Brussels-Berlin in mid-April 2007) and in any case before the next EU-US spring summit;
Kar zadeva pogajanja o dolgoročnem sporazumu PNR
As regards the negotiation of the long-term PNR agreement
poudarja, da bi moral imeti prihodnji dolgoročni sporazum PNR, razen v točkah, ki jih je Parlament sprejel že septembra, podlago v naslednjih načelih:
Stresses that, in addition to the points already adopted by Parliament in September, a future long-term PNR agreement should be founded on the following principles:
(a) oblikovanje politik, utemeljeno na dokazih: pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma je treba pripraviti temeljito oceno; odgovoriti bi bilo treba na vprašanje učinkovitosti obstoječega sporazuma (in tistega prejšnjega), pa tudi na vprašanje stroškov in konkurenčnosti evropskih letalskih družb; ocena se mora nanašati na izvajanje obvez in na vprašanje podatkov iz PNR v ATS;
(a) evidence-based policy-making: a thorough evaluation must be carried out before a new agreement is concluded; the question of the effectiveness of the current agreement (and the previous one) should be addressed, as should the issue of the costs and competitiveness of European airline companies; the evaluation must address the implementation of the undertakings and the matter of PNR data in ATS;
(b) prenos PNR mora temeljiti na jasnem načelu omejevanja na podlagi namena;
(b) transfers of PNR must be based on a clear purpose limitation principle;
(c) utemeljenost in sorazmernost: zdi se, da podatki iz sistema APIS ( Advanced Passenger Information System ) v praksi več kot zadostujejo za namene kazenskega pregona in za varnostne namene; ti podatki se v Evropi že zbirajo v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (EGS) 2299/89 in je zato v primerljivem režimu že mogoča njihova izmenjava z ZDA; kot kaže, imajo podatki o obnašanju v PNR le omejeno uporabnost, saj jih ni mogoče prepoznati, če niso povezani s sistemom APIS; utemeljitev za splošen prenos podatkov iz PNR torej ni zadovoljiva;
(c) justification and proportionality: it would seem that in practice, for law enforcement and security purposes, APIS data are more than sufficient; these data are already collected in Europe in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) 2299/89, and may therefore be exchanged with the US under a comparable regime; behaviour data in the PNR seem to be of limited use, as they cannot be identified if not linked to APIS; the justification for the general transfer of PNR data is therefore not satisfactory;
(d) prihodnji sporazum mora temeljiti na ugotavljanju primernosti, kar zadeva varstvo osebnih podatkov; z evropske strani je očitno, da so nujno potrebna pravila za varstvo osebnih podatkov v tretjem stebru, pa tudi svetovna merila, ki bi urejala vse kategorije osebnih podatkov;
(d) a future agreement must be based on an adequacy finding with regard to the protection of personal data; from the European side, it is clear that rules for the protection of personal data in the third pillar are urgently needed, as well as global standards covering all categories of personal data;
(e) obstajati mora redno ocenjevanje primernosti in učinkovitosti varstva podatkov v programu pri čemer sodeluje EP in po možnosti kongres ZDA; letno ocenjevanje mora biti del vsakega prihodnjega sporazuma; poročilo o oceni je treba objaviti in predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu;
(e) there must be a regular evaluation of the programme's data protection adequacy and effectiveness, involving the EP and, if possible, the US Congress; an annual evaluation must be part of any future agreement; the evaluation report must be made public, and must be submitted to the European Parliament;
(f) alternativne rešitve, kot je elektronska odobritev potovanj v okviru programa oprostitve vizumov ( Visa Waiver Program ), ki nadomeščajo prenos PNR s strani letalskih družb, morajo ravno tako izpolnjevati evropska merila za varstvo podatkov;
(f) alternative solutions, such as the Electronic Travel Authorisations within a Visa Waiver Programme, instead of the transfer of PNR by airline companies, must equally comply with European data protection standards;
(g) pogoji, ki so trenutno določeni v obveznostih ZDA, morajo postati sestavni del sporazuma in morajo biti pravno obvezujoči; prihodnji sporazum mora imeti več demokratične legitimnosti s celovito udeležbo Evropskega parlamenta in/ali ratifikacijo v nacionalnih parlamentih;
(g) the conditions currently laid down in the US undertakings must become an integral part of the agreement and must be legally binding; a future agreement must have more democratic legitimacy, with full involvement of the European Parliament and/or ratification by national parliaments;
(h) v vsakem primeru mora prihodnji sporazum temeljiti na sistemu PUSH, sistem PULL pa ne bi smel biti več sprejemljiv, saj bi moral že prejšnji sporazum uvesti sistem PUSH, takoj ko je bil tehnično izvedljiv;
(h) in any case, a future agreement must be based on the PUSH system and the PULL system should no longer be acceptable given that PUSH should already have been introduced under the previous agreement, as soon as it was technically feasible;
(i) potniki bi morali biti obveščeni o prenosu evidenc iz PNR in imeti dostop do svojih podatkov, vključno z možnostjo njihovega popravljanja in spreminjanja, imeti pa bi morali tudi pravno sredstvo za dostop do zakonskega mehanizma ali neodvisnega organa za varstvo podatkov;
(i) passengers should be informed of the transfer of PNR records and have access to their data, including rectifying and modifying them, as well as having legal recourse to a legal mechanism or to an independent data protection authority;
Kar zadeva dostop do podatkov družbe SWIFT
As regards the access to SWIFT data