natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja nov pristop, ki predvideva prehod s političnega dialoga na strateško politično sodelovanje, v katerem je Južna Afrika opredeljena kot "država stabilnosti", sposobna doseganja skupnih ciljev glede regionalnih, afriških in svetovnih vprašanj, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da ima Južna Afrika pomembno vlogo kot predstavnica držav podsaharske Afrike v mednarodnih forumih, npr. v STO in ZN;
Welcomes the new approach which is to move from political dialogue to strategic political cooperation in which South Africa is identified as the 'anchor country' capable of pursuing shared objectives on regional, African and global issues, taking into account the fact that South Africa plays an important role as spokesperson for Sub-Saharan African countries in international fora such as the WTO and the United Nations;
poziva Južno Afriko, naj razjasni odnos med Južnoafriško razvojno skupnostjo (SADC), Južnoafriško carinsko unijo (SACU) in Sporazumom o trgovini in razvojnem sodelovanju (TDCA), da bi se načrtovala bolj urejena razvojna politika; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni politiko EU v odnosu do SADC, SACU in TDCA, pri čemer naj upošteva pogajanja o sporazumu o gospodarskemu partnerstvu;
Calls for South Africa to clarify the relationship between SADC, SACU and TDCA , with a view to devising a more orderly regional development policy; calls on the Commission to clarify EU policy in relation to SADC, SACU and TDCA, taking into account the EPA negotiations;
predlaga, naj se politični dialog med EU in Južno Afriko še naprej razvija preko rednih izmenjav obiskov parlamentarnih delegacij (ki so ključne za večje vzajemno razumevanje vprašanj skupnega interesa, demokratičnih sistemov obeh strani in področij pristojnosti);
Suggests that the EU-South Africa political dialogue should be further developed by means of regular exchange visits by parliamentary delegations (which are essential if there is to be greater mutual understanding of matters of common interest, the two parties' respective democratic systems and areas of responsibility);
poudarja specifično politično vlogo, ki jo Južna Afrika že ima za celino (npr. v Sudanu, Kongu, Liberiji); meni, da mora Evropska unija to vlogo priznati in jo podpirati; v tem kontekstu poudarja pomen Afriške unije, katere ena od ustanoviteljic in aktivnih članic je Južna Afrika, kot morebitne predstavnice afriške celine v globaliziranem svetu ter upa, da se bo Afriška unija še naprej razvijala;
Emphasises the specific political role which South Africa is already playing for the whole continent (e.g. for Sudan, Congo, Liberia) and considers that this position has to be acknowledged and supported by the European Union; emphasises in this context the importance of the African Union − of which South Africa is one of the founders and also an active member − as a possible spokesperson for the African continent in a globalised world, and hopes for further development of the African Union;
v zvezi s tem poziva Južno Afriko, naj uporabi svoj politični vpliv za dosego miroljubne rešitve krize v svoji mejni državi Zimbabve;
Calls, in this respect, on South Africa to use this political influence to bring about a peaceful settlement of the crisis in its neighbouring country Zimbabwe;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva dejstvo, da je Južna Afrika v sklopu mednarodnih povezav ustvarila pomembne politične in trgovinske vezi z azijskimi državami in državami Latinske Amerike ter z razvitimi državami;
Asks the Commission to bear in mind the fact that South Africa has built up important policy and trade links with Asian and Latin American countries and with developed countries in the context of international configurations;
poudarja, da mora akcijski načrt upoštevati gospodarske razlike med EU in Južno Afriko, zlasti na področju trgovine, saj je z vidika pol-razvitih gospodarstev s strani STO priznana pri svojih prizadevanjih posebnega, diferenciranega obravnavanja, ki bo omogočilo ohranjanje nekaterih tarif in ostalih trgovinskih ukrepov, potrebnih za zaščito teh gospodarstev v nastajanju;
Stresses that the Action Plan should take economic differences between the EU and South Africa into account, particularly in the area of trade, as − with regard to semi-developed economies − is acknowledged by the WTO itself in its advocacy of special, differential treatment which will enable certain tariffs and other trade measures needed for the purpose of protecting those fledgling economies to remain in force;
poudarja, da mora biti v akcijskem načrtu posebej poudarjeno ustvarjanje pobud za tuja vlaganja preko oblikovanja inovativne strategije ob povezovanju z vlado Južne Afrike, da bi presegli glavne ovire za vlaganja, kot so družbene in gospodarske posledice AIDS-a, visoka stopnja kriminala in vpletenost države v politiko zaposlovanja in premoženje;
Stresses that under the Action Plan, particular emphasis should be placed on creating incentives for foreign investment through the drawing up of an innovative strategy in association with the South African authorities with a view to overcoming the main obstacles to investment, such as the social and economic impact of AIDS, the high crime rate and state involvement in employment policy and property;
poziva Komisijo, naj ne vztraja pri vključitvi elementov v revidiran Sporazumu o trgovini, razvoju in sodelovanju, ki bi ovirali južnoafriški gospodarski razvoj ali boj za zmanjšanje revščine, naj se ne vmešava v odločanje Južne Afrike glede udeležbe zasebnega sektorja pri zagotavljanju osnovnih storitev in naj ne ponovi napak, ki so povzročile neuspeh prostotrgovinskih pogajanj, v katerih so ZDA skušale vsiliti nesprejemljive pogoje državam Južnoafriške carinske unije;
Urges the Commission not to insist on including in the revised TDCA elements which would hamper South African economic development or the struggle for poverty alleviation, not to interfere in South Africa's decisions regarding the participation of the private sector in the provision of basic services and to draw lessons from the failure of the SACU-US free trade negotiations, in which the USA tried to impose unacceptable conditions on SACU;
predlaga, da se iz proračuna EU zagotovi sredstva za olajšanje zahtevnega procesa integracije trgovine v južnoafriški regiji,
Suggests that the EU budget provide appropriations to facilitate the difficult trade integration process in the southern African region;
predlaga, da se v akcijski načrt in proračun EU vključi podporo za dobro južnoafriško strategijo varnosti preskrbe z energijo ob upoštevanju podnebnih sprememb ter njihovega socialnega in okoljskega vpliva na revne v Južni Afriki in okoliški regiji, pri čemer se med drugim osredotoči na razvoj obnovljivih virov energije, zlasti na majhne hidroelektrarne, vetrno energijo in biomaso;
Suggests that the Action Plan and the EU budget include support for a sound South African energy security strategy taking into account climate change and its social and environmental impact on the poor in South Africa and the region, focusing inter alia on the development of renewable sources of energy, in particular small hydropower plants, wind energy and biomass;
poudarja, da mora biti akcijski načrt participativen in zajemati več zainteresiranih strani ter biti osredotočen na podporo prednostnim nalogam Južne Afrike, vključno z dejavnostmi za preprečevanje širjenja virusa HIV, vladnimi ukrepi za oživitev gospodarstva in bojem proti gospodarskim razlikam; akcijski načrt naj podpira socialno kohezijo in zagotovi, da od gospodarstva ne bo imela koristi le finančna elita, v skladu s pobudo za pospešeno in skupno rast Južne Afrike in strategijo za gospodarsko udejstvovanje temnopoltega prebivalstva;
Stresses that the Action Plan should have a participatory and multi-stakeholder approach and focus on support for South African priorities, including action to combat the spread of HIV, the government's measures for economic recovery and the fight against economic inequality, foster social cohesion and ensure that economic benefits spread beyond the emerging financial elite, in line with the ASGISA and the BEE strategy;
predlaga, naj se nameni prednost tistim prošnjam Južne Afrike za tehnično pomoč, ki so osredotočene na doseganje razvojnih ciljev države in obenem prispevajo k družbenemu in gospodarskemu razvoju regije, s čimer se bo vzpodbudilo ostale afriške voditelje, da prevzamejo odgovornost glede oblikovanja in izvedbe trajnostnega modela gospodarskega razvoja za celino;
Suggests that those South African demands for technical assistance which are focused on reaching the development objectives of the country and also contribute to the social and economic development of the region should be prioritised, with a view to encouraging other African leaders to assume their responsibilities as regards drawing up and implementing a sustainable economic development model for the continent;
poleg tega predlaga, naj se na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja oblikuje področje sodelovanja, v katerem bodo študenti in učitelji, ter se odpre program Erasmus Mundus za Južno Afriko;
Furthermore, proposes that an area of cooperation should be developed in the field of education and training, to include exchanges of students and teachers and a South Africa Window in the Erasmus Mundus programme;
ugotavlja, da je imela Južna Afrika dokajšnje koristi zaradi posojil Evropske investicijske banke in poziva, naj se za obdobje 2007-2013 ohrani vsaj enaka raven podpore, ob upoštevanju potreb mikropodjetij ter malih in srednjih podjetij;
Notes the considerable benefits that South Africa has derived from loans from the European Investment Bank and calls for at least an equal level of support to be maintained for the period 2007-2013 while taking into account the needs of micro enterprises and SMEs;
vztraja, da mora biti razvojna pomoč dodeljena lokalno ter da se lahko zunanje strokovnjake zaposli in blago uvaža samo, ko v regiji ni na razpolago primerljivega znanja ali blaga;
Insists that development assistance should be allocated locally and external experts only employed and goods only imported when no comparable expertise or goods are available in the region;
poudarja, da lahko Južna Afrika v južnoafriški regiji in tudi na celotni afriški celini po zaslugi svojih edinstvenih izkušenj utre pot na področju politike priseljevanja; zato poudarja, da mora Južna Afrika nujno okrepiti prizadevanja za sprejetje skladnega in učinkovitega načrta priseljevanja; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj podpreta ta prizadevanja preko izmenjave izkušenj ter naj se osredotočita na to posebno vlogo Južne Afrike v migracijskih programih, kot je program za finančno in tehnično pomoč tretjim državam na področjih migracije in azila (AENEAS), in program njegovega spremljanja;
Stresses the pioneering role in the field of immigration policy which South Africa could play for the southern African region and also for the African continent as a whole thanks to its unique experience in this field; stresses therefore that South Africa urgently needs to strengthen its efforts to adopt a coherent and efficient migration policy; calls on the Council and the Commission to foster these efforts with an exchange of experiences as well as to focus on this special role of South Africa in migration programmes such as AENEAS and its follow-up programme;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzdržuje stalen dialog z južnoafriško vlado in naj vključi Parlament, lokalne vlade in civilno družbo v razpravo o strateškem partnerstvu, akcijskem načrtu in njegovem kasnejšem izvajanju;
Urges the Commission to stay in constant dialogue with the South African Government and to include Parliament, local governments and civil society in the discussion of Strategic Partnership and of the Action Plan and its subsequent implementation;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic EU ter vladi in Državnemu zboru Republike Južne Afrike.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the EU Member States and the Government and the National Assembly of the Republic of South Africa.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnem instrumentu za okolje (LIFE+) (6284/1/2006 – C6-0226/2006 – 2004/0218(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Financial Instrument for the Environment (LIFE+) (6284/1/2006 – C6-0226/2006 – 2004/0218(COD) )
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (6284/1/2006 – C6-0226/2006 ) UL C 238 E, 3.10.2006, str.
having regard to the Council common position (6284/1/2006 – C6-0226/2006 ) OJ C 238 E, 3.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave UL C 157 E, 6.7.2006, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0621 ),
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0621 ),
ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2004)0621 /2),
having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0621 /2),
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0288/2006 )
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0288/2006 ),
poziva Komisijo, naj v odsotnosti sporazuma med so-zakonodajalci o LIFE+ v drugi obravnavi predloži rešitev, ki bo omogočala financiranje dejavnosti, ki sodijo v institucionalne pristojnosti in ki bodo od leta 2007 naprej uvrščene v program LIFE+; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga začasne ukrepe za projektne dejavnosti, da bi se izognili finančni vrzeli in zagotovili kontinuiteto okoljske politike Komisije in trajnostnega razvoja v letu 2007;
Urges the Commission, in the absence of an agreement between the co-legislators on LIFE+ at second reading, to present a solution permitting the financing of activities falling under the institutional prerogatives that from 2007 onwards are due to fall under the LIFE+ programme; calls on the Commission to propose provisional measures for project activities in order to avoid a financing gap and to guarantee continuity of the Community's environmental policy and sustainable development in 2007;
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C 255, 14.10.2005, str.
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C 255, 14.10.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij UL C 231, 20.9.2005, str.
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions OJ C 231, 20.9.2005, p.
27. junija 2006 (UL C 238 E, 3.10.2006, str.
27 June 2006 (OJ C 238 E, 3.10.2006, p.
24. oktobra 2006.
24 October 2006.
trajnostnega razvoja
sustainable development
Evropske unije.
of the European Union
Ti finančni instrumenti Skupnosti ne zajemajo vseh okoljskih prednostnih nalog.
These Community financial instruments do not cover all environmental priorities.
Podporo bi bilo treba zagotoviti s pomočjo sporazumov o donacijah in pogodb o javnih naročilih v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
Support should be provided through grant agreements and public procurement contracts in accordance with Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
Za zagotovitev najboljše možne porabe sredstev Skupnosti bi morali ukrepi in projekti, ki se financirajo iz LIFE+, izpolnjevati merila za pridobitev
Measures and projects financed under LIFE+ should meet eligibility criteria to secure the best possible use of Community
Na področju narave in biotske raznovrstnosti izvajanje politike in zakonodaje Skupnosti samo po sebi zagotavlja okvir za evropsko dodano vrednost.
In the area of nature and biodiversity, the implementation of Community policy and legislation itself provides a framework for European added value.
Ukrepi in projekti najboljše prakse ali demonstrativni ukrepi in projekti, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani z upravljanjem in določitvijo območij Natura 2000 v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
Best practice or demonstration measures and projects, including those relating to the management and designation of Natura 2000 sites in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
in Direktivo Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
and Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
, bi morali biti upravičeni do financiranja Skupnosti iz LIFE+, razen če so že upravičeni do financiranja v okviru drugih finančnih instrumentov Skupnosti.
, should be eligible for Community financing under LIFE+, except where they are eligible for funding under other Community financial instruments.
Komisija bi morala do pregleda finančnega okvira leta 2008/2009 pripraviti pregled obsega, v katerem ti dopolnilni instrumenti prispevajo k financiranju omrežja Natura 2000, da bo možno LIFE+ prilagoditi potrebnim spremembam ter zagotoviti visoko stopnjo sofinanciranja Skupnosti.
The Commission should produce a review of the contribution of these complementary instruments to the financing of Natura 2000 in time for the 2008/2009 review of the Financial Framework with a view to adapting LIFE+ to the necessary changes and ensuring a high level of Community co-financing.
Države članice so se v Malahidu leta 2004 dogovorile, da je treba uvesti ukrepe za zagotovitev ustreznega financiranja omrežja Natura 2000, vključno s sofinanciranjem Skupnosti.
The Member States agreed in Malahide in 2004 that arrangements needed to be established to ensure adequate financing for the Natura 2000 network, including Community co-financing.
Ker bo s to uredbo omogočeno financiranje zgolj najboljših praks ali demonstrativnih ukrepov, povezanih z upravljanjem območij Natura 2000, bodo morale Komisija in države članice zagotoviti, da bo na voljo dovolj sredstev prek drugih instrumentov za upravljanje omrežja, ki EU kot celoto po ocenah letno stane približno 6 100 000 000 EUR.
Since this Regulation will only finance best practice or demonstration measures related to the management of Natura 2000 sites, the Commission and Member States will need to ensure that sufficient funds are made available through other instruments for the management of the network, the annual cost of which is estimated to be around EUR 6 100 000 000 for the EU as a whole.
Inovativni ukrepi in projekti ali demonstrativni ukrepi in projekti, ki se nanašajo na okoljske cilje Skupnosti, kar vključuje razvoj ali širjenje tehnik najboljše prakse, znanja in izkušenj ali tehnologij, ter ukrepi in projekti za kampanje osveščanja in posebno usposabljanje oseb, ki sodelujejo pri preprečevanju gozdnih požarov, bi morali biti upravičeni do financiranja Skupnosti iz LIFE+, razen če so že upravičeni do financiranja v okviru drugih finančnih instrumentov Skupnosti.
Innovative or demonstration measures and projects relating to Community environmental objectives, including the development or dissemination of best practice techniques, know-how or technologies, as well as measures and projects for awareness-raising campaigns and special training for agents involved in forest fire prevention interventions should be eligible for Community financing under LIFE+, except where they are eligible for funding under other Community financial instruments.
Ukrepi in projekti za razvoj in izvajanje ciljev Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na široko zasnovano, usklajeno, izčrpno in dolgoročno spremljanje gozdov in medsebojnih okoljskih vplivov, bi morali biti upravičeni do financiranja Skupnosti iz LIFE+, razen če so že upravičeni do financiranja v okviru drugih finančnih instrumentov Skupnosti.
Measures and projects for the development and implementation of Community objectives relating to the broad-based, harmonised, comprehensive and long-term monitoring of forests and environmental interactions should be eligible for Community financing under LIFE+, except where they are eligible for funding under other Community financial instruments.
Z izzivom, ki ga predstavlja razvoj in izvajanje učinkovite politike na podlagi 6.
The challenge of effective policy development and implementation under the 6th EAP can be met only through support for
Finančna podpora na podlagi te uredbe bi morala biti zato usmerjena v razvoj, izvajanje, spremljanje in ocenjevanje okoljske politike in zakonodaje ter v obveščanje o njej ter v njeno razširjanje na celotnem območju Skupnosti.
Financial support under this Regulation should therefore contribute to the development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of environmental policy and legislation, as well as its communication and dissemination throughout the Community.
LIFE+ bi morali sestavljati trije deli: LIFE+ Narava in biotska raznovrstnost; LIFE+ Okoljska politika in upravljanje; LIFE+ Informacije in obveščanje.
LIFE+ should have three components: LIFE+ Nature and Biodiversity, LIFE+ Environment Policy and Governance, and LIFE+ Information and Communication.
Treba bi bilo omogočiti, da ukrepi in projekti, ki se financirajo iz LIFE+, prispevajo k uresničitvi posebnih ciljev več kakor zgolj enega od teh treh delov, da vključujejo sodelovanje več kakor ene države članice ter da prispevajo tudi k razvoju strateških pristopov za doseganje okoljskih ciljev.
It should be possible for measures and projects financed by LIFE+ to contribute to the achievement of the specific objectives of more than one of these three components and to involve the participation of more than one Member State, as well as to contribute to the development of strategic approaches to meeting environmental objectives.
Za izpolnitev svoje vloge glede dajanja pobud za razvoj okoljskih politik in glede njihovega izvajanja bi morala Komisija uporabljati sredstva iz LIFE+, in sicer da bi izvedla študije in ocene, prevzela naloge v zvezi z izvajanjem in vključevanjem okoljske politike in zakonodaje, organizirala sestanke, seminarje in delavnice s strokovnjaki in zainteresiranimi stranmi ter da bi razvijala in vzdrževala mreže in računalniške sisteme.
In order to carry out its role in the initiation of environment policy development and implementation, the Commission should use resources from LIFE+ to complete studies and evaluations, to undertake services with a view to the implementation and integration of environment policy and legislation, to hold meetings, seminars and workshops with experts and stakeholders, to develop and maintain networks and to develop and maintain computer systems.
Poleg tega bi morala Komisija uporabljati del proračuna LIFE+, ki se upravlja centralno, za izvajanje dejavnosti v zvezi z obveščanjem, objavljanjem in razširjanjem informacij, vključno s prireditvami, razstavami in podobnimi ukrepi za osveščanje, za pripravo in produkcijo avdiovizualnega materiala ter za tehnično in/ali administrativno pomoč, potrebno za opredelitev, pripravo, upravljanje, spremljanje, revizijo in nadzor programov in projektov.
In addition, the Commission should use the centrally managed part of the LIFE+ budget to undertake information, publication and dissemination activities, including events, exhibitions and similar awareness-raising measures, for the preparation and production costs of audio-visual materials, and to obtain technical and/or administrative assistance relating to the identification, preparation, management, monitoring, audit and supervision of programmes and projects.
Nevladne organizacije (NVO) prispevajo k razvoju in izvajanju okoljske politike in zakonodaje Skupnosti.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) contribute to the development and implementation of Community environmental policy and legislation.