natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker je vodja oddelka v uradu generalnega tožilca dne 1. marca 2012 izjavil, da se lahko osebam, ki tuje države in mednarodne organizacije pozivajo k uvedbi gospodarskih in drugih sankcij za Belorusijo začasno prepove potovanje v tujino ali se jih celo kazensko preganja, in zaradi tega nekateri zagovorniki človekovih pravic, opozicijski politiki in neodvisni novinarji niso smeli zapustiti Belorusije, ali pa jim je bil izstop iz države zavrnjen na meji z EU;
E. whereas, on 1 March 2012 a department head at the Prosecutor General’s Office stated that ‘persons calling on foreign states and international organisations to impose economic and other sanctions against Belarus might be subjected to a temporary ban on foreign travel and even to criminal prosecution’ and, as a follow-up to this, some human rights defenders, opposition politicians and independent journalists have not been allowed to leave Belarus or have been even turned away at the border with EU;
F. ker so države članice EU svoje veleposlanike v Minsku poklicale na posvetovanja in so vse države članice EU beloruske veleposlanike povabile na svoja zunanja ministrstva;
F. whereas the ambassadors of the EU Member States in Minsk were all called back for consultations to their capitals and all EU Member States summoned Belarusian ambassadors to their foreign ministries;
G. ker je sklep držav članic EU jasen pokazatelj solidarnosti in enotnosti EU pri zunanjih zadevah in bosta učinkovitost dejanj EU ter uspešno spodbujanje in izvajanje evropskih vrednot v EU in zunaj nje odvisna od odločne zavezanosti k skupnemu delovanju;
G. whereas the decision of the EU Member States is a clear sign of solidarity and unity of the EU in foreign affairs matters and effectiveness of the EU actions and successful promotion of European values inside as well as outside the EU and its successful implementation will depend on its firm commitment to act united;
H. ker politika EU glede Belorusije še vedno temelji na pogoju, da morajo beloruske oblasti za izboljšanje odnosov med EU in Belorusijo izpustiti vse politične zapornike, ali posledično;
H. whereas the EU policy towards Belarus remains based on conditionality whereas the Belarusian authorities to improve EU-Belarus relations by releasing all the political prisoners or, as a consequence;
I. ker je izboljšanje dvostranskih odnosov z Evropsko unijo odvisno tudi od napredka vlade Belorusije pri izpolnjevanju obvez v okviru Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter spoštovanje temeljnih človekovih pravic, pravne države in demokratičnih načel; vključno z izpustitvijo političnih zapornikov; ker bi bila posledica povečanje samoizolacije, ki bi vplivala na belorusko ljudstvo in vodila k večji odvisnosti od Rusije;
I. whereas the improvement of bilateral relations with the European Union is also conditional on progress by the Government of Belarus towards the fulfilment of its OSCE commitments and the respect for fundamental human rights, the rule of law and democratic principles; including the release of political prisoners; whereas as a consequences increase its self-isolation, which would affect the Belarusian people and also lead to a stronger dependence on Russia;
J. ker je Svet EU sklenil razširiti seznam oseb, za katere veljajo sankcije, saj beloruski režim vedno bolj zatira družbo;
J. whereas the EU Council has decided to extend the list of persons subject to sanctions because of the Belarusian regime’s increasing repression of society;
1. pozdravlja sklep o odpoklicu vseh veleposlanikov držav članic EU iz Belorusije, kar je v diplomatski praksi EU dejanje brez primere in kar dokazuje, da beloruskim oblastem ni uspelo razdeliti Evropske unije pri sklepih o sankcijah;
Welcomes the decision to withdraw all the Ambassadors of the EU Member States from Belarus, which is an unprecedented move in the EU’s diplomatic practice and proves that the Belarusian authorities’ attempts to divide the European Union over decisions on sanctions have failed;
9. istočasno poziva EU, naj okrepi svoje sodelovanje z belorusko civilno družbo, okrepi odnose z opozicijo in podpre demokratična prizadevanja beloruskega ljudstva;
Calls on the EU at the same time to strengthen its engagement with Belarusian civil society, enhance its ties with the opposition and support democratic aspirations of the Belarusian people;
13.3.2012 B7-0180/2012 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko
13.3.2012 B7-0180/2012 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
o Belorusiji ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
on Belarus ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
PE486.719v01-00 B7‑0180/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Belorusiji ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
PE486.719v01-00 B7‑0180/2012 European Parliament resolution on Belarus ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Belorusiji, zlasti tistih z dne 15. februarja 2012, 13. septembra 2011, 12. maja 2011, 10. marca 2011, 20. januarja 2011, 10. marca 2010 in 17. decembra 2009,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Belarus, in particular that of 15 February 2012, 13 September 2011, 12 May 2011, 10 March 2011, 20 January 2011, 10 March 2010, 17 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta EU za zunanje zadeve z dne 23. januarja 2012 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Belorusiji,
– having regard to the EU Foreign Affairs Council decision of 23 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta EU za zunanje zadeve 2012/126/SZVP z dne 28. februarja 2012 o okrepitvi omejevalnih ukrepov za Belorusijo in uvrstitvi še 21 oseb, odgovornih za zatiranje civilne družbe in demokratične opozicije na seznam tistih, za katere velja prepoved potovanja in zamrznitev premoženja,
– having regard to the EU Foreign Affairs Council decision 2012/126/CFSP of 28 February 2012 to reinforce restrictive measures against Belarusian adding additional 21 persons responsible for the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition on the travel ban and asset freeze list,
– ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice Catherine Ashton z dne 28. februarja 2012 o sklepu beloruskih oblasti glede odpoklica vodje delegacije EU in poljskega veleposlanika v Minsku,
– having regard to the Statement by High Representative Catherine Ashton of 28 February 2012 on the decision of Belarusian authorities to recall the EU Head of Delegation and Polish Ambassador to Minsk,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije 1857(2012) Sveta Evrope z dne 25. januarja 2012 o razmerah v Belorusiji, s katero je obsodil nenehno preganjanje pripadnikov opozicije in nadlegovanje aktivistov civilne družbe, neodvisnih medijev in zagovornikov človekovih pravic v Belorusiji,
– having regard to the Council of Europe resolution on the situation on Belarus of 25 January 2012 1857(2012) condemning continuous persecution of members of the opposition and the harassment of civil society activists, independent media and human rights defenders in Belarus,
A. ker se je diplomatski spor med EU in Belorusijo razsežnosti brez primere zaostril po tem, ko so beloruske oblasti v odgovor na sklep Evropskega sveta z dne 28. februarja 2012 zahtevale, da veleposlanik Evropske unije in poljski veleposlanik zapustita državo, ter odpoklicale svoja veleposlanika iz Bruslja in Varšave;
A. whereas EU-Belarus diplomatic conflict of unprecedented scope escalated after the Belarusian authorities requested that the ambassador of the European Union and the Polish ambassador leave the country and recalled its own ambassadors from Brussels and Warsaw as a response to the European Council decision of 28 February 2012;
B. ker so bili veleposlaniki držav članic EU v Minsku odpoklicani na posvetovanja v ustrezne prestolnice in so vse države članice EU beloruske veleposlanike povabile k svojim zunanjim ministrom;
B. whereas the ambassadors of the EU Member States in Minsk were all called back for consultations to their capitals and all EU Member States summoned Belarusian ambassadors to their foreign ministries;
1. zahteva, da beloruske oblasti nemudoma in brezpogojno izpustijo vse zapornike, zaprte iz političnih razlogov, in jim povrnejo pravice; ostro graja nadaljevanje represivnih ukrepov proti članom demokratične opozicije, svobodnim medijem, aktivistom civilne družbe in zagovornikom človekovih pravic; poziva beloruske oblasti, naj izpolnijo svoje mednarodne obveznosti na področju civilnih in političnih pravic;
Demands that the Belarusian authorities immediately and unconditionally release and rehabilitate all those detained on political grounds; strongly criticises the continuation of the repressive measures against members of the democratic opposition, the free media, civil society activists and human rights defenders; calls on the Belarusian authorities to fulfil its international obligations in the field of civil and political rights;
3. izraža globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi diplomatskega spora med beloruskimi oblastmi in Evropsko unijo; je zaskrbljen, da dejavnosti obeh strani krepita ozračje nezaupanja in sovražnosti med Belorusijo in Evropsko unijo, zaradi česar se navzkrižja poslabšujejo, namesto da bi med njima potekal tvoren dialog in bi iskali mehanizme vzajemno koristnega sodelovanja in sosedstva;
Expresses deep concern at the diplomatic conflict between the authorities of Belarus and the European Union; is concerned that the actions of both sides reinforces the atmosphere of mistrust and hostility between Belarus and the European Union, leading to further aggravation of contradictions instead of holding productive dialogue and searching mechanisms of mutually beneficial cooperation and neighbourhood;
5. naroči predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje parlamentu in oblastem Belorusije, državam članicam, Komisiji in Svetu, parlamentarni skupščini Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje ter vladi in parlamentu Rusije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Belarus Parliament and authorities, the Member States, the Commission and the Council, and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Parliamentary Assembly of the OSCE, the government and Parliament of Russia.
13.3.2012 B7-0181/2012 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko
13.3.2012 B7-0181/2012 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
PE486.720v01-00 B7‑0181/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Belorusiji ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
PE486.720v01-00 B7‑0181/2012 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Belarus ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Belorusiji, zlasti z dni 15. februarja 2012, 13. septembra 2011, 12. maja 2011, 10. marca 2011, 20. januarja 2011, 10. marca 2010 in 17. decembra 2009,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Belarus, in particular that of 15 February 2012, 13 September 2011, 12 May 2011, 10 March 2011, 20 January 2011, 10 March 2010, 17 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega sveta z dne 1. in 2. marca 2012 o globoki zaskrbljenosti glede nadaljnjega poslabšanja razmer v Belorusiji,
– having regard to the European Council Conclusion as of 1‑2 March 2012 expressing its deep concern over the further deterioration of the situation in Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta EU za zunanje zadeve 2012/126/SZVP z dne 28. februarja 2012 o okrepitvi omejevalnih ukrepov proti beloruskemu režimu,
– having regard to the EU Foreign Affairs Council decision 2012/126/CFSP of 28 February 2012 to reinforce restrictive measures against Belarusian regime,
– ob upoštevanju izjave, ki jo je po sklepu beloruskih oblasti dala visoka predstavnica Catherine Ashton dne 28. februarja 2012, in sicer da bosta odpoklicana vodja delegacije EU in poljski veleposlanik v Minsku,
– having regard to the Statement by High Representative Catherine Ashton of 28 February 2012 on the decision of Belarusian authorities to recall the EU Head of Delegation and Polish Ambassador to Minsk,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice z dne 17. junija 2011, ki obsoja kršitve človekovih pravic v času pred predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji, med njimi in po koncu volitev ter poziva belorusko vlado, naj preneha s preganjanjem opozicijskih voditeljev,
– having regard to the UN Human Rights Council resolution of 17 June 2011 condemning human rights violations before, during and after the presidential elections in Belarus and calling on the Belarusian government to end the ‘persecution’ of opposition leaders,
– ob upoštevanju izjave vrha vzhodnega partnerstva, sprejete na srečanju v Pragi od 7. do 9. maja 2009, in izjave o razmerah v Belorusiji, sprejete 30. septembra 2011 na vrhu vzhodnega partnerstva v Varšavi,
– having regard to the Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit adopted in Prague on 7‑9 May 2009 and the Declaration on the situation in Belarus adopted on the occasion of the Eastern Partnership Summit in Warsaw on 30 September 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa letnega kongresa Mednarodne hokejske zveze v Bernu maja 2009, da bo svetovno prvenstvo v hokeju na ledu leta 2014 gostila Belorusija, sprejetega kljub preganjanju političnih nasprotnikov Aleksandra Lukašenka in številnih kršitev človekovih pravic v Belorusiji,
– having regard to the decision of the Annual Congress of the International Ice Hockey Federation in Bern of May 2009 to host the 2014 IIHF World Championship in Belarus, despite persecution of Alyaksandr Lukashenka’s political opponents and widespread human rights abuse in Belarus,
B. ker so se politične razmere od predsedniških volitev 19. decembra 2010 resno poslabšale zaradi represivnih ukrepov proti pripadnikom demokratične opozicije, svobodnim medijem, aktivistom civilne družbe in zagovornikom človekovih pravic kljub temu, da je mednarodna skupnost oblasti večkrat pozvala, naj se ti ukrepi nemudoma končajo;
B. whereas the political situation in Belarus has been seriously deteriorating since the presidential elections of 19 December 2010 with repressive measures, being undertaken against members of the democratic opposition, the free media, civil society activists and human rights defenders, despite repeated calls from the international community to halt these measure immediately;
C. ker se je doslej najhujši diplomatski spor med EU in Belorusijo zaostril po tem, ko so beloruske oblasti na sklep Evropskega sveta z dne 28. februarja 2012 odzvale z zahtevo, da veleposlanik Evropske unije in poljski veleposlanik zapustita državo, ter odpoklicale svoja veleposlanika iz Bruslja in Varšave;
C. whereas EU-Belarus diplomatic conflict of unprecedented scope escalated after the Belarusian authorities requested that the ambassador of the European Union and the Polish ambassador leave the country and recalled its own ambassadors from Brussels and Warsaw as a response to the European Council decision of 28 February 2012;
D. ker je Aleksander Lukašenko v tem okviru osebno napadel nemškega zunanjega ministra, pri tem pa presegel mejo diplomatskega bontona;
D. whereas, in this context, Aleksandr Lukashenka followed up with a personal attack on the Foreign Minister of Germany that went beyond any diplomatic etiquette;
E. ker je vodja oddelka urada generalnega tožilca dne 1. marca 2012 izjavil, da se lahko osebam, ki tuje države in mednarodne organizacije pozivajo k uvedbi gospodarskih in drugih sankcij za Belorusijo, začasno prepove potovanje v tujino ali se jih celo kazensko preganja, zaradi česar nekateri zagovorniki človekovih pravic, opozicijski politiki in neodvisni novinarji niso smeli zapustiti Belorusije, ali pa so bili zavrnjeni na meji z EU;
E. whereas, on 1 March 2012 a department head at the Prosecutor General’s Office stated that ‘persons calling on foreign states and international organizations to impose economic and other sanctions against Belarus might be subjected to a temporary ban on foreign travel and even to criminal prosecution’ and, as a follow up to this, some human rights defenders, opposition politicians, independent journalists have not been allowed to leave Belarus or have been even turned away at the border with EU;
F. ker je belorusko ministrstvo za pravosodje dne 14. februarja 2012 že četrtič brez pravne podlage sprejelo sklep o zavrnitvi registracije beloruske krščanske demokratske stranke, pri tem pa so člani te stranke po poročanju prvič prejeli grožnje o fizičnem napadu, v kolikor ne bodo umaknili svojih podpisov kot ustanoviteljev stranke;
F. whereas the Belarusian Ministry of Justice took the decision on 14 February 2012 to refuse registration of the Belarusian Christian Democracy party for the fourth time already with no legal reasons to do so while, according to reports, for the first time the BCD members heard the threats of physical assault on them if they do not withdraw their signatures as the party founders;
G. ker so države članice EU svoje veleposlanike v Minsku poklicale na posvetovanja in so vse države članice EU beloruske veleposlanike povabile na svoja zunanja ministrstva;
G. whereas the ambassadors of the EU Member States in Minsk were all called back for consultations to their capitals and all EU Member States summoned Belarusian ambassadors to their foreign ministries;
H. ker je sklep držav članic EU jasen pokazatelj solidarnosti in enotnosti EU pri zunanjih zadevah in bosta učinkovitost dejanj EU ter uspešno spodbujanje in izvajanje evropskih vrednot v EU in zunaj nje odvisna od odločne zavezanosti skupnemu delovanju;
H. whereas the decision of the EU member states is a clear sign of solidarity and unity of the EU in foreign affairs matters and effectiveness of the EU actions and successful promotion of European values inside as well as outside the EU and its successful implementation will depend on its firm commitment to act united;
I. ker je izboljšanje dvostranskih odnosov z Evropsko unijo odvisno tudi od izpustitve vseh političnih zapornikov ter napredka vlade Belorusije pri izpolnjevanju obvez v okviru Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter spoštovanje temeljnih človekovih pravic, pravne države in demokratičnih načel;
I. whereas the improvement of bilateral relations with the European Union is also conditional upon the release of all political prisoners as well as progress by the Government of Belarus towards the fulfilment of its OSCE commitments and the respect for fundamental human rights, the rule of law and democratic principles;
1. poudarja, da sklep o umiku vseh veleposlanikov držav članic EU iz Belorusije dokazuje, da beloruskim oblastem ni uspelo razdeliti Evropsko unijo pri sklepih o sankcijah;
Underlines that the decision to withdraw all the Ambassadors of the EU member states from Belarus proves that the Belarusian authorities’ attempts to divide the European Union over decisions on sanctions have failed;
10. poudarja, da bi morali imeti Evropska unija in Belorusija dobre sosedske odnose in da te odnose zelo krepi tesno sodelovanje EU z belorusko civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo ter podpora EU demokratičnim prizadevanjem beloruskega ljudstva;
Stresses that the European Union and Belarus should have good neighbourly relations, and that those are strongly supported by EU close engagement with Belarusian civil society and democratic opposition and its support of democratic aspirations of the Belarusian people;
13.3.2012 B7-0182/2012/REV PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko
13.3.2012 B7-0182/2012/REV MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
PE486.721v01-00 B7‑0000/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Belorusiji ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
PE486.721v01-00 B7‑0182/2012 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Belarus ( 2012/2581(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega sveta z dne 1. in 2. marca 2012, s katerim je izrazil globoko zaskrbljenost glede nadaljnjega poslabšanja razmer v Belorusiji,
– having regard to the European Council Conclusion as of 1/2 March 2012 expressing its deep concern over the further deterioration of the situation in Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta EU za zunanje zadeve 2012/126/SZVP z dne 28. februarja 2012 o okrepitvi omejevalnih ukrepov proti beloruskemu režimu po nadaljnjem poslabšanju razmer v Belorusiji z uvrstitvijo še 21 oseb, odgovornih za zatiranje civilne družbe in demokratične opozicije, na seznam tistih, za katere velja prepoved potovanja in zamrznitev premoženja,
– having regard to the EU Foreign Affairs Council decision 2012/126/CFSP of 28 February 2012 to reinforce restrictive measures against Belarusian regime following further deterioration of the situation in Belarus, by adding additional 21 persons responsible for the repression of civil society and the democratic opposition on the travel ban and asset freeze list,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice z dne 17. junija 2011, ki obsoja kršitve človekovih pravic v času pred predsedniškimi volitvami v Belorusiji, med njimi in po koncu volitev ter poziva belorusko vlado, naj preneha s preganjanjem opozicijskih voditeljev,
– having regard to the UN Human Rights Council resolution of 17 June 2011 condemning human rights violations before, during and after the presidential elections in Belarus and calling on the Belarusian government to end the ‘persecution’ of opposition leaders,
– ob upoštevanju izjave vrha vzhodnega partnerstva, sprejete na srečanju v Pragi od 7. do 9. maja 2009, in izjave o razmerah v Belorusiji, sprejete 30. septembra 2011 na vrhu vzhodnega partnerstva v Varšavi,
– having regard to the Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit adopted in Prague on 7-9 May 2009 and the Declaration on the situation in Belarus adopted on the occasion of the Eastern Partnership Summit in Warsaw on 30 September 2011,
B. ker so se politične razmere od predsedniških volitev 19. decembra 2010 resno poslabšale zaradi represivnih ukrepov proti pripadnikom demokratične opozicije, svobodnim medijem, aktivistom civilne družbe in zagovornikom človekovih pravic, čeprav je mednarodna skupnost oblasti večkrat pozvala, naj se ti ukrepi nemudoma končajo;
B. whereas the political situation in Belarus has been seriously deteriorating since the presidential elections of 19 December 2010 with repressive measures, being undertaken against members of the democratic opposition, the free media, civil society activists and human rights defenders, despite repeated calls from the international community to halt these measure immediately;
C. ker se je doslej najhujši diplomatski spor med EU in Belorusijo zaostril po tem, ko so beloruske oblasti v odgovor na sklep Evropskega sveta z dne 28. februarja 2012 zahtevale, da veleposlanik Evropske unije in poljski veleposlanik zapustita državo, ter odpoklicale svoja veleposlanika iz Bruslja in Varšave;
C. whereas EU-Belarus diplomatic conflict of unprecedented scope escalated after the Belarusian authorities requested that the ambassador of the European Union and the Polish ambassador leave the country and recalled its own ambassadors from Brussels and Warsaw as a response to the European Council decision of 28 February 2012;
D. ker je Aleksander Lukašenko v tem okviru osebno napadel nemškega zunanjega ministra, pri tem pa uporabil negativne in žaljive izraze ter presegel mejo diplomatskega bontona;
D. whereas, in this context, Aleksandr Lukashenka followed up with a personal attack on the Foreign Minister of Germany using an obscure offensive lexicology that went beyond any diplomatic etiquette;
F. ker so države članice EU svoje veleposlanike v Minsku poklicale na posvetovanje in so vse države članice EU beloruske veleposlanike povabile na svoja zunanja ministrstva;
F. whereas the ambassadors of the EU Member States in Minsk were all called back for consultations to their capitals and all EU Member States summoned Belarusian ambassadors to their foreign ministries;