natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– posredovanje jasnih in preglednih informacij o načinu opravljanja storitev, o prekinitvi ali prenehanju zagotavljanja storitev;
- clear and transparent information on the arrangements for execution, suspension or termination of the service provided;
– posredovanje izčrpnih informacij o dajatvah, obrestih, provizijah, jamstvih, penalih, odškodninah in plačilnih obrokih;
- full information on fees, interest, commissions, guarantees, penalties, compensation and instalments;
– predhodno pisno obvestilo potrošnikom o spremembah obrestnih mer ali provizij, ki so del pogodbe, ali pridobitev predhodnega dovoljenja potrošnikov;
- notification of the consumer in writing before any change in interest rates or commission, or, alternatively, prior agreement of the consumer in writing;
– podelitev pravice potrošnikom, da se odpovejo storitvam in brez dodatnih stroškov odstopijo od pogodbe, če zavračajo spremembe pogodbenih klavzul, in kaznovanje gospodarskih subjektov, če ne bi upoštevali sprememb teh klavzul;
- agreement concerning the consumer's right to withdraw from the service and contract without additional costs should he not wish to accept modifications to the terms of the contract, and penalisation of economic operators who do not abide by such modifications to those terms;
– odškodnina potrošnikom, ki bi utrpeli škodo zaradi gospodarskih subjektov;
- compensation for the consumers affected in case of damage for which the economic operator is responsible;
– priprava pogodb v čitljivi obliki z velikostjo uporabljenih črk vsaj 10.
- drawing-up of contracts in a legible format and in at least a 10-point font.
ki ga predlagajo Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Daniel Dăianu, Marian Zlotea in Rareş-Lucian Niculescu
by Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Daniel Dăianu, Marian Zlotea and Rareș-Lucian Niculescu
o povečanju sredstev mehanizma za srednjeročno finančno pomoč v zvezi s plačilno bilanco v državah članicah
on expanding the medium-term financial assistance mechanism for the balance of payments in the Member States
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o povečanju sredstev mehanizma za srednjeročno finančno pomoč v zvezi s plačilno bilanco v državah članicah
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on expanding the medium-term financial assistance mechanism for the balance of payments in the Member States
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z dne 18. februarja 2002,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002,
ker višina sredstev mehanizma Skupnosti za srednjeročno finančno pomoč v zvezi s plačilno bilanco v državah članicah znaša le 12 milijard EUR, medtem ko je leta 1999 znašala 16 milijard EUR,
whereas the medium-term Community financial assistance mechanism for the balance of payments in the Member States amounts to a mere EUR 12 bn, by contrast with a 1999 level of EUR 16 bn,
ker se je od leta 1999 število držav članic povečalo od 15 na 27,
whereas the number of Member States has increased since 1999 from 15 to 27,
ob upoštevanju hudih posledic finančne krize v novih državah članicah, ki niso del euroobmočja,
having regard to the severe impact of the financial crisis in the new Member States which are outside the eurozone,
ker bi bilo zaželeno, da se novim državam članicam omogoči, da po potrebi najprej izkoristijo podporo v okviru institucij EU,
whereas it is desirable that the new Member States should be able to appeal if necessary, in the first place, to the support agreed by the EU institutions,
ker se je obstoječi mehanizem izkazal za nezadostnega pri nudenju pomoči državam članicam za upravljanje možne neuravnoteženosti plačilne bilance,
whereas the existing mechanism has proved to be insufficient in terms of aiding Member States to manage potential balance of payments imbalances,
meni, da je treba med sedanjo gospodarsko konjunkturo povečati financiranje za ta mehanizem, in sicer od sedanjih 12 na najmanj 20 milijard EUR;
Considers that the present economic conjuncture calls for an increase in funding for this mechanism, from the present EUR 12 bn to at least EUR 20 bn;
meni, da je treba uporabo tega instrumenta oceniti v povezavi z uporabo drugih instrumentov, ki so na razpolago institucijam EU.
Considers that the use of this mechanism should be assessed in conjunction with that of other instruments available to the EU institutions.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0480/2008
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0480/2008
o razmerah na področju čebelarstva
on the situation in the beekeeping sector
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah na področju čebelarstva
European Parliament resolution on the situation in the beekeeping sector
ker je čebelarstvo v svetu in zlasti v Evropi v zelo hudih težavah,
whereas the beekeeping sector throughout the world, and more particularly in placeEurope, is encountering very serious difficulties,
ker je čebelarstvo koristno za celoten ekosistem, zlasti pa za kmetijski ekosistem,
whereas apiculture has a beneficial impact on the ecosystem as a whole and the agricultural ecosystem in particular,
ker je ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti temeljnega pomena, čebele pa k temu pomembno prispevajo z opraševanjem,
whereas it is essential to preserve biodiversity, to which apiculture makes a significant contribution through cross-pollination activities,
ker je čebelarstvo dejavnost, ki se v Evropi opravlja že nekaj tisoč let ter je sestavni del kulturne in kmetijske dediščine,
whereas beekeeping has been practised in placeEurope for thousands of years and forms an integral part of its cultural and agriculture heritage,
ker imajo čebelarski proizvodi dober hranilni in zdravilni učinek,
noting the nutritional and medicinal benefits of apiculture products,
ker so med in drugi čebelarski proizvodi, kot so matični mleček, propolis, strup in čebelji vosek, ki jih proizvaja evropsko čebelarstvo, zaradi njegove izkušenosti in različnih podnebnih razmer zelo raznoliki in visoke kakovosti,
bearing in mind the variety and high quality of honey and other apiculture products such as royal jelly, propolis, venom and beeswax produced by the European beekeeping sector due to its expertise and the diversity of its climate,
ker je čebelarstvo žrtev nelojalne konkurence proizvodov iz tretjih držav, ki se jih uvaža za tržišče Skupnosti,
whereas the sector suffers unfair competition from products originating in third countries and imported into the Community market,
ker se med lahko uvaža iz različnih območij sveta, vendar le zadostno število čebel zagotavlja opraševanje,
whereas honey may be imported from various regions of the world, but only bees, in sufficient numbers, can guarantee pollination,
ker grozi resnična nevarnost, da bo zaradi zmanjšanja razpoložljivosti cvetnega prahu in nektarja upadlo število čebeljih kolonij,
noting the serious threat of a decline in bee colonies due to the significant reduction in the supply of pollen and nectar,
ker je v svetu že močno upadlo število čebeljih kolonij,
having regard to the drastic decline in the number of bee colonies in the world,
ker so med razlogi za težko zdravstveno stanje čebel stalna prisotnost v panjih različnih vrst pršice varoja, kolaps čebeljega roja (CCD-colony collapse disorder) ter nosemavost (širjenje enocelične praživali noseme ceranae ) ,
whereas the continued presence in hives of Varroa spp. parasites, colony collapse disorder and the spread of Nosema ceranae are among the causes of the crisis in bee health,
ker je 76 % živilskih proizvodov za prehrano ljudi odvisnih od čebelarstva,
whereas 76% of the production of food for human consumption is dependent on the beekeeping sector,
ker je 84 % rastlinskih vrst, gojenih v Evropi, odvisnih od opraševanja,
whereas 84% of vegetable species cultivated in placeEurope depend on pollination,
ker se prepogosto ne upoštevajo navodila in dobra praksa pri uporabi biocidov,
whereas the instructions and good practice applicable to the use of biocides are too often ignored,
ker še ne obstajajo metode za izkoreninjanje nekaterih čebeljih obolenj, ki povzročajo upad njihove odpornosti ter izgubo čebeljih rojev,
recalling that no methods exist as yet to eradicate certain bee diseases resulting in a reduction in their resistance capacity and the loss of hives,
meni, da se je treba na primeren način in z učinkovitimi sredstvi nemudoma odzvati na težko zdravstveno stanje čebel,
Considers that it is essential to respond without delay to the crisis in bee health in an appropriate manner and with effective weapons;
meni, da je treba sprejeti ukrepe proti nelojalni konkurenci čebelarskih proizvodov iz tretjih držav, ki nastaja zaradi nižjih proizvodnih stroškov, zlasti cene sladkorja in delovne sile;
Considers that action should be taken to tackle unfair competition from apiculture products originating in third countries, which is partly the result of lower production costs, particularly as regards the price of sugar and labour;
poziva Komisijo, naj takoj začne s spodbujanjem raziskav o zajedavcih in boleznih, ki desetkajo čebelje družine, in o razlogih zanje, ter naj omogoči dodatna proračunska sredstva za tovrstne raziskave;
Calls on the Commission to immediately step up further research into the parasites and diseases decimating the bee population and their causes, while making additional budgetary resources available for this research;
meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se na oznakah obvezno navede država, iz katere izvira med;
Considers it vital to make it compulsory to indicate the country of origin of bee honey on labels;
poziva Komisijo, naj ob pregledu skupne kmetijske politike oblikuje ukrepe za spodbujanje vzpostavitve nadomestnih ekoloških območij (kot so območja prahe za čebele), zlasti na večjih območjih ornih kultur; poziva, naj se ta območja vzpostavijo v predelih, kjer so najtežji pogoji za obdelavo in kjer bodo lahko rasle facelija, boraga, njivska gorčica ali bela plazeča deteljica, ki predstavljajo dragoceni vir nektarja na območjih, kjer čebele nabirajo medičino;
Calls on the Commission to put in place measures within the CAP Health Check encouraging the creation of ecological compensation zones (such as apicultural set-aside areas) especially in large areas of arable cultivation; calls for such zones to be situated in those parts of fields which are difficult to cultivate, where plants such as phacelia, borage, charlock and wild white clover could be grown, providing rich sources of nectar in bees' gathering areas;
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja ukrepe, potrebne za omejitev tveganj zaradi nezadostnega opraševanja tako za čebelarje kot za kmete, katerih proizvodnja bi se lahko močno povečala;
Calls on the Commission to promote the necessary measures to limit the risk of insufficient pollination both for beekeepers and for farmers, whose production could increase considerably;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi nadzor in spremljanje kakovosti površinskih voda, saj so čebele zelo občutljive na vsakršno poslabšanje stanja v njihovem okolju;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the quality of surface water is monitored and controlled, as bees are highly sensitive to any deterioration in their environment;
poziva Komisijo, naj začne z raziskavami o povezavi med smrtnostjo čebel in uporabo pesticidov, kot so tiametoksam, imidakloprid, klotianidin in fipronil, da bi se po potrebi sprejeli ustrezni ukrepi v zvezi z dovoljeni za te proizvode;
Calls on the Commission to undertake research into the link which exists between bee mortality and the use of pesticides such as thiamethoxam, imidacloprid, clothianidin and fipronil so that it can take whatever appropriate measures are necessary as regards authorisation of such products;
poziva Komisijo, naj uskladi vse informacije o sedanjih razmerah, s katerimi trenutno razpolagajo države članice; meni, da bi Komisija morala sodelovati s priznanimi organizacijami, s katerimi bi si izmenjala znanstvene informacije, ki so jim na voljo, o posledicah, ki jih imajo pesticidi za čebele;
Calls on the Commission to coordinate all information pertaining to this situation that is presently available in each Member State; believes that the Commission should cooperate with recognised organisations with a view to exchanging scientific information they have concerning the impact of pesticides on bees;
meni, da je nujno treba uvesti obvezo, da se uvoženi med da v analizo ter tako odkrije morebitno prisotnost bacila, ki povzroča gnilobo čebelje zalege;
Considers it vital to introduce a requirement that imported honey be analysed to detect the possible presence of American foulbrood bacteria;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga mehanizem finančne pomoči za čebelarje, ki so se zaradi smrtnosti svojih čebel znašli v težavah;
Urges the Commission to propose a financial aid mechanism for apiaries which are in difficulties due to bee mortality;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svojo veterinarsko politiko vključi raziskave o boleznih čebel ter ukrepe za boj proti tem boleznim;
Calls for the Commission to incorporate into its veterinary policy research into, and action to tackle, bee diseases;
poziva Komisijo k spodbujanju vseh držav članic, naj čebelarskemu sektorju namenijo takojšnjo pomoč;
Calls on the Commission to urge all Member States to bring forward immediate support for the beekeeping sector;
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0479/2008
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0479/2008
ki ga predlagata Miroslav Ouzký in Caroline Jackson
by Miroslav Ouzký and Caroline Jackson
o reviziji priporočila 2001/331/ES o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah
on the review of Recommendation 2001/331/EC providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the PlaceNameMember States
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o reviziji priporočila 2001/331/ES o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah
European Parliament resolution on the review of Recommendation 2001/331/EC providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States
ob upoštevanju priporočila 2001/331/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta s 4. aprila 2001 o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah (2001/331/ES),
having regard to the Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States (2001/331/EC),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije (KOM(2007)707) Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o reviziji priporočila 2001/331/ES o določitvi najmanjših meril za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede v državah članicah,
having regard to Communication COM(2007)707 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the review of Recommendation 2001/331/EC providing for minimum criteria for environmental inspections in the Member States,
ker sta Evropski parlament in Svet leta 2001 sprejela priporočilo 2001/331/ES, ki vsebuje nezavezujoča merila za načrtovanje, izvajanje in spremljanje okoljskih inšpekcij ter poročanje o njih in ki ugotavlja, da obstajajo velike razlike med inšpekcijskimi sistemi držav članic,
whereas in 2001 Parliament and the Council adopted Recommendation 2001/331/EC, containing non-binding criteria for planning, carrying out, following up and reporting on environmental inspections, recognising that there was a wide disparity between inspection systems in the Member States,
ker je bil namen priporočila povečati ravnanje v skladu s pravom varstva okolja Skupnosti in prispevati k njegovi doslednejši uporabi in zagotavljanju izvrševanja v vseh državah članicah,
whereas this recommendation's aim was to strengthen compliance with Community environmental law and to contribute to its more consistent implementation and enforcement in all Member States,
ker sporočilo KOM(2007)707 vsebuje stališča Komisije o nadaljnjem razvoju priporočila, ki med drugim temeljijo na poročilih držav članic o izvajanju priporočila,
whereas Communication COM(2007)707 sets out the Commission's views on further development of the recommendation, based, inter alia, on the reports that the Member States have submitted on their implementation of the recommendation,
ker sporočilo ugotavlja, da so informacije držav članic o tem, kako izvajajo priporočilo, 'nepopolne ali pa jih je bilo težko primerjati',
whereas the Communication noted that the information submitted by the Member States on how they were implementing the recommendation was 'incomplete or difficult to compare',
ker so informacije držav članic kazale na to, da 'ga je le nekaterim uspelo izvesti v celoti' in da 'še vedno obstaja veliko neskladje glede načina izvajanja okoljskih inšpekcijskih pregledov znotraj Skupnosti',
whereas the information submitted by the Member States demonstrated that 'only a few have achieved full implementation', and that 'there are still large disparities in the way environmental inspections are being carried out within the Community',
ker gre, po mnenju Komisije, nepopolno izvajanje deloma pripisati različnemu razumevanju držav članic opredelitev in meril iz priporočila ter obveznosti poročanja,
whereas according to the Commission the situation of incomplete implementation is partially due to differing interpretations by Member States of the definitions and criteria of the recommendation and of the reporting requirements,
ker Komisija priznava, da je področje uporabe priporočila neprimerno in ne vključuje številnih pomembnih dejavnosti, kot so Natura 2000, nadzor nezakonitih pošiljk odpadkov, registracija in avtorizacija kemikalij (REACH), omejevanja uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v izdelkih (npr. direktiva RoHS), trgovina z ogroženimi vrstami ter dejavnosti, povezane z gensko spremenjenimi organizmi ter sistemi odgovornosti proizvajalcev,
whereas the Commission recognises that the scope of the recommendation is inadequate and does not include many important activities, such as Natura 2000, the control of illegal waste shipments, the registration and authorisation of chemicals (REACH), the restriction of certain hazardous substances in products (e.g. the RoHS Directive), trade in endangered species as well as activities related to genetically modified organisms and producer responsibility systems,
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi zaključka Komisije, da v Skupnosti ni mogoče zagotoviti popolnega izvajanja okoljske zakonodaje, saj to vodi k nadaljnjemu okolju škodljivemu ravnanju, pa tudi k izkrivljanju konkurence;
Voices its concern at the Commission's conclusion that the full implementation of environmental legislation in the Community cannot be ensured, since this leads not only to continuing damage to the environment but also to distortions of competition;
poudarja, da je dobro in enakomerno izvajanje prava varstva okolja Skupnosti nujno, vsaka pomanjkljivost v zvezi s tem pa ne izpolnjuje pričakovanj javnosti in slabi ugled Skupnosti kot učinkovitega varuha okolja;
Emphasises that good and even enforcement of Community environmental law is essential, and that anything less falls short of public expectations and undermines the reputation of the Community as an effective guardian of the environment;
nasprotuje namenu Komisije, da reši težavo le s pomočjo nezavezujočega priporočila ter z vključitvijo posebnih pravno zavezujočih zahtev v področno zakonodajo;
Opposes the Commission's intention of dealing with the problem only through a non-binding recommendation and through the insertion of specific legally binding requirements in sectoral legislation;
poziva Komisijo, naj raje pred koncem leta 2009 predlaga direktivo o okoljskih inšpekcijskih pregledih, ki bi pojasnila opredelitve in merila ter razširila področje uporabe;
Urges the Commission to instead come forward, before the end of 2009, with a proposal for a directive on environmental inspections, clarifying the definitions and criteria and extending the scope;
meni, da je nujno okrepiti mrežo Evropske unije za izvajanje in uveljavljanje zakonodaje na področju okolja (IMPEL), in poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2009 poroča o tem, kako bi bilo mogoče to doseči, vključno z ustanovitvijo organa Skupnosti za okoljske inšpekcijske preglede;
Considers it essential to strengthen the European Union Network for the Implementation and Enforcement of Environmental Law (IMPEL) and urges the Commission to report, before the end of 2009, on possible ways of doing so, including the establishment of a Community environmental inspection force;
predlaga, da se nameni večji poudarek podpori okoljskega izobraževanja in zagotavljanju informacij, katerih posebna vsebina se določi na lokalni, regionalni ali nacionalni ravni na osnovi ugotovljenih potreb in problemov določenega območja;
Proposes that greater emphasis be placed on supporting environmental education and information provision, the specific content of which would be determined at local, regional or national level on the basis of the needs and problems identified in a given area;
OSNUTEK PREDLOGA RESOLUCIJE
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION
ki ga predlagajo Zita Gurmai, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Michael Cashman, Stephen Hughes, Anna Hedh in Anne Van Lancker
by Zita Gurmai, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Jan Marinus Wiersma, Michael Cashman, Stephen Hughes, Anna Hedh and Anne Van Lancker
o virusu HIV/aidsu: zgodnje odkrivanje in zdravljenje
on HIV/AIDS: Early diagnosis and early care
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o virusu HIV/aidsu: zgodnje odkrivanje in zdravljenje
European Parliament resolution on HIV/AIDS: Early diagnosis and early care
upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. aprila 2007 o boju proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropski uniji in sosednjih državah za obdobje 2006–2009 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0137 . ;
having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2007 on combating HIV/AIDS within the European Union and in the neighbouring countries, 2006-2009 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0137 . ,
ob upoštevanju bremenske deklaracije z dne 13. marca 2007 z naslovom Odgovornost in partnerstvo – skupaj proti virusu HIV/aidsu,
having regard to the Bremen Declaration of 13 March 2007 on 'Responsibility and Partnership – Together against HIV/AIDS',
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2006 z naslovom "HIV/AIDS: čas za ukrepanje" Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0321 . ,
having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2006 on HIV/AIDS: time to deliver Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0321 . ,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 30. novembra 2006 o aidsu Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0526 . ,
having regard to its resolution of 30 November 2006 on AIDS Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0526 . ,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 6. junija 2005 o boju proti virusu HIV/aidsu,
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 6 June 2005 on combating HIV/AIDS,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o boju proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropski uniji in sosednjih državah za obdobje 2006–2009 KOM(2005)0654. ,
having regard to the Commission Communication to the Council and the European Parliament on 'Combating HIV/AIDS within the European Union and in the neighbouring countries, 2006-2009' COM(2005)0654. ,
ob upoštevanju Dublinske deklaracije o partnerstvu za boj proti okužbam z virusom HIV/aidsom v Evropi in Srednji Aziji, ki jo je sprejela ministrska konferenca z naslovom "Premostimo ovire – partnerstvo za boj proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropi in Srednji Aziji", ki je potekala v okviru irskega predsedovanja EU 23. in 24. februarja 2004,
having regard to the 'Dublin Declaration' on partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia, adopted at the Ministerial Conference 'Breaking the Barriers – Partnership to fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and Central Asia' held within the framework of the Irish EU Presidency on 23-24 February 2004,
ob upoštevanju poročila UNAIDS/WHO za Evropo za leto 2008 z naslovom Napredek pri izvajanju Dublinske deklaracije o partnerstvu za boj proti virusu HIV/aidsu v Evropi in Srednji Aziji,
having regard to the UNAIDS/WHO Europe report entitled 'Progress on implementing the Dublin Declaration on Partnership to Fight HIV/AIDS in Europe and placeCentral Asia' of 2008,