natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
K. ker Abd al Rahim al Naširi trdi, da je bil med letoma 2002 in 2003 nekaj mesecev zaprt v skritem zaporu obveščevalne agencije CIA na Poljskem in da so ga v tem obdobju mučili, ter ker se je ob podpori nevladnih organizacij s področja človekovih pravic pritožil na Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice,
K. whereas Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri has alleged that for several months in 2002 and 2003 he was held in secret CIA detention in Poland and that he was tortured during this period, and whereas on 10 May 2011 he appealed to the European Court of Human Rights with the support of human rights NGOs,
L. ker je kljub dokazom, da so bile v boju proti terorizmu po mednarodnem pravu zagrešene hude kršitve človekovih pravic in hudodelstva, kot so mučenje, trpinčenje, pridržanje v izolaciji in prisilno izginotje, bilo tako v ZDA kot v EU sproženih le malo sodnih postopkov,
L. whereas notwithstanding the evidence that extremely serious human rights violations and crimes under international law, such as torture, ill-treatment, incommunicado detention and enforced disappearances, have taken place in the fight against terrorism, few people have been brought to justice in this connection, either in the US or in the EU,
3. ponavlja svoje vztrajno nasprotovanje uporabi mučenja in trpinčenja ter smrtni kazni v vseh primerih in v vseh okoliščinah, ter še enkrat poudarja, da odprava smrtne kazni prispeva h krepitvi človekovega dostojanstva in postopnemu razvoju človekovih pravic;
Reiterates its long-standing opposition to the use of torture and ill-treatment and to the death penalty in all cases and under all circumstances, and emphasises once again that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity and the progressive development of human rights;
8. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so številne države članice sprejele pripornike iz Guantanama, in poziva, naj še več držav članic sodeluje pri tem z vlado ZDA;
Welcomes the fact that a number of Member States have accepted Guantánamo detainees for resettlement, and calls on more Member States to cooperate with the US Government to this effect;
o Ukrajini: primer Julije Timošenko in drugih članov nekdanje vlade
on Ukraine: the cases of Yulia Tymoshenko and other members of the former government
PE465.675v01-00 } PE465.677v01-00 } PE465.678v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Ukrajini: primer Julije Timošenko in drugih članov nekdanje vlade
PE465.675v01-00 } PE465.677v01-00 } PE465.678v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on Ukraine: the cases of Yulia Tymoshenko and other members of the former government
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Ukrajini, zlasti resolucije z dne 25. februarja 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0444 .
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Ukraine, in particular its resolution of 25 November 2010 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0444 .
– ob upoštevanju pridružitvenega načrta med EU in Ukrajino, ki nadomešča akcijski načrt in ki ga je junija 2009 sprejel svet za sodelovanje med EU in Ukrajino,
– having regard to the EU-Ukraine Association Agenda, which replaces the Action Plan and was endorsed by the EU-Ukraine Cooperation Council in June 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. maja 2011 z naslovom Pregled evropske sosedske politike ( KOM(2010)0207 ) in poročila o napredku o izvajanju evropske sosedske politike z dne 25. maja 2011,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 May 2011 entitled ‘Taking stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy’ ( COM(2010)0207 ) and to the progress report of 25 May 2011 on implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy,
– ob upoštevanju izjave svojega predsednika o pridržanju Julije Timošenko 24. maja 2011,
– having regard to the statement made by its President on the detention of Yulia Tymoshenko on 24 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izjave predstavnika za stike z javnostjo visoke predstavnice EU Catherine Ashton o primeru Julije Timošenko z dne 26. maja 2011,
– having regard to the statement made on 26 May 2011 by the spokesperson of EU High Representative Catherine Ashton on the case of Yulia Tymoshenko,
– ob upoštevanju zakona, ki ga je sprejel ukrajinski parlament 7. aprila 2011 o preprečevanju in odpravljanju korupcije, ki bo začel veljati 1. julija 2011,
– having regard to the bill on preventing and tackling corruption that was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada on 7 April 2011 and will come into effect on 1 July 2011,
A. ker je EU naklonjena stabilni in demokratični Ukrajini, ki bo spoštovala načela tržnega gospodarstva in pravne države, človekove pravice in varstvo manjšin ter zagotavljala temeljne pravice; ker so notranja politična stabilnost Ukrajine, njena osredotočenost na notranje reforme in spoštovanje načela pravne države, kar vključuje poštene, nepristranske in neodvisne sodne postopke, predpogoj za nadaljnji razvoj odnosov med EU in Ukrajino; ker vzhodno partnerstvo obsega vsa ta načela,
A. whereas the EU favours a stable and democratic Ukraine that respects the principles of a social market economy, the rule of law, human rights and the protection of minorities and that guarantees fundamental rights; whereas domestic political stability, a focus on internal reform and respect for the rule of law, incorporating fair, impartial and independent legal processes, in Ukraine are prerequisites for the further development of relations between the EU and Ukraine; whereas the Eastern Partnership encompasses all these principles,
B. ker se obsežna reforma sodstva in ukrepi za zagotovitev spoštovanja načela pravne države pri kazenskih preiskavah in pregonih, vključno z načelom poštenih, nepristranskih in neodvisnih sodnih postopkov v Ukrajini, še ne izvaja,
B. whereas a comprehensive reform of the judiciary and measures to ensure respect for the rule of law in criminal investigations and prosecutions, including the principle of fair, impartial and independent judicial proceedings, has not yet been implemented in Ukraine,
C. ker korupcija in zloraba moči v Ukrajini ostaja razširjena težava, ki zahteva jasen odziv organov za privedbo odgovornih pred sodišče; ker morajo biti pregoni in preiskave nepristranski in neodvisni in se ne smejo uporabljati za uresničevanje političnih ciljev,
C. whereas corruption and abuse of power remain widespread in Ukraine and require an unequivocal response by the authorities in bringing those responsible to justice; whereas prosecutions and investigations must be impartial and independent and must not be used for political ends,
D. ker je 24. maja 2011 ukrajinski urad splošnega državnega tožilca zaključil preiskavo v zvezi s primerom nekdanje predsednice vlade Julije Timošenko, na podlagi katere je bila obtožena zlorabe položaja pri sklepanju pogodb o dobavi plina z Rusko federacijo v letu 2009,
D. whereas on 24 May 2011 the Prosecutor General’s Office in Ukraine completed the investigation into the case against Yulia Tymoshenko, former Prime Minister of Ukraine, and brought charges of abuse of power in connection with the conclusion of gas contracts with the Russian Federation in 2009,
E. ker sta bila 21. februarja 2011 dva kazenska postopka proti Juliji Timošenko združena v enega, v katerem je obtožena poneverjanja sredstev iz naslova prodaje pravic do emisij toplogrednih plinov v okviru kjotskega protokola in neprimerne razporeditve 67 milijonov ukrajinskih hrivnij, ki so bili iz ukrajinskega državnega proračuna na podlagi vladne garancije dodeljeni avstrijski vladi za nakup in uvoz 1000 vozil Opel Combo, navidezno namenjenih za zdravstvene namene na podeželskih območjih, ko je bila predsednica vlade,
E. whereas on 21 February 2011 two criminal proceedings against Yulia Tymoshenko were combined into one case in which she is accused of embezzling funds from the sale of greenhouse-gas emission quotas under the Kyoto Protocol and of misappropriating UAH 67 million that has been allocated from Ukraine’s State budget, under a government guarantee to the Austrian Government, for the purchase and import of 1 000 Opel Combo vehicles ostensibly to be used for medical purposes in rural areas while she was prime minister,
F. ker je bila Julija Timošenko od začetka preiskav 15. decembra 2010 zaslišana 44-krat in ji je bila za skoraj 6 mesecev izrečena prepoved potovanja tako znotraj kot tudi zunaj Ukrajine, in so ji ukrajinske oblasti v štirih primerih preprečile potovanje znotraj Ukrajine ter v Bruselj v februarju in juniju in je bila 25. maja 2011 pozvana pred sodišče, kjer so jo več ur zasliševali preden je bila izpuščena,
F. whereas, since the launch of the investigations on 15 December 2010, Yulia Tymoshenko has been interrogated 44 times, a travel ban has been imposed on her, both domestically and internationally, for nearly six months, she has been prevented by the Ukrainian authorities from travelling inside Ukraine on four occasions, as well as from travelling to Brussels in February and in June, and she was summoned and questioned on 25 May 2011 for several hours before being released,
G. ker se 12 nekdanjih visokih uradnikov vlade Julije Timošenko nahaja v preiskovalnem priporu, vključno z nekdanjim ministrom za notranje zadeve Jurijem Lučenkom, enim od voditeljev stranke za samoobrambo ljudstva, ki je bil obtožen zlorabe položaja in neustrezne dodelitve sredstev ter je bil aretiran 26. decembra 2010 za domnevno nepripravljenost na sodelovanje s tožilstvom, in nekdanjim namestnikom ministra za pravosodje Jevhenom Korničukom, ki je bil aretiran 22. decembra 2010 zaradi obtožb v zvezi s kršitvijo zakonodaje pri postopkih javnih naročil za pravne storitve,
G. whereas 12 former high-ranking officials from the Tymoshenko government are in pre-trial detention, including the former Interior Minister, Yuri Lutsenko, one of the leaders of the People's Self-Defence Party, who has been charged with abuse of office and misappropriation of funds and was arrested on 26 December 2010 for alleged non-cooperation with the prosecution, and the former First Deputy Minister of Justice, Yevhen Korniychuk, who was arrested on 22 December 2010 on charges of breaking the law in connection with public procurement procedures for legal services,
H. ker Lučenko ni bil izpuščen iz preiskovalnega pripora, ko se je 23. maja 2011 začelo njegovo sojenje, čeprav je pripor zaradi domnevne nepripravljenosti na sodelovanje pri preiskavi njegovega primera izredno nesorazmeren ukrep,
H. whereas Mr Lutsenko was not released from pre-trial detention when his trial opened on 23 May 2011, despite the fact that detention for alleged non-cooperation in the investigation of his case is an extremely disproportionate measure,
I. ker so bila v predhodnem poročilu danskega Helsinškega odbora za človekove pravice o sojenju Lučenku in Korničuku navedene grobe kršitve Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah,
I. whereas a preliminary report of the Danish Helsinki Committee for Human Rights on the Lutsenko and Korniychuk trials has listed massive violations of the European Convention on Human Rights,
J. ker so se začeli kazenski postopki proti nekdanjemu ministru za gospodarstvo Bogdanu Danilišinu, ki je pobegnil iz Ukrajine in mu je Češka republika odobrila politični azil; ker se s kazenskimi obtožbami soočata tudi nekdanji minister za okolje Georgij Filipčuk in nekdanji začasni minister za obrambo Valerij Ivašenko,
J. whereas criminal proceedings have been started against the former Economy Minister, Bohdan Danylyshin, who fled Ukraine and has been granted political asylum in the Czech Republic; whereas the former Environment Minister, Georgy Filipchuk, and the former Acting Defence Minister, Valery Ivashchenko, also face criminal charges,
K. ker je bil 24. januarja 2011 priprt nekdanji predsednik Krimskega parlamenta Anatolij Gričenko (stranka regij) ter obtožen zlorabe položaja, ki vključuje nezakonito oddajo 4800 hektarov zemljišč; ker je bil kasneje odprt drug kazenski primer, ki vključuje nepremičninsko goljufijo v povezavi s turističnimi zemljišči na Jalti,
K. whereas the former speaker of the Crimean Parliament, Anatoliy Grytsenko (Party of Regions), was detained on 24 January 2011 and accused of an abuse of power involving the giving away of 4800 hectares of land illegally; whereas another criminal case was later opened, involving land fraud in connection with resort land in Yalta,
L. ker je urad splošnega državnega tožilca prav tako sprožil kazensko preiskavo zaradi zlorabe položaja proti nekdanjemu predsedniku Ukrajine Leonidu Kučmi,
L. whereas the Prosecutor General's Office has also opened a criminal investigation for abuse of power against the former President of Ukraine, Leonid Kuchma,
M. ker ukrajinska ustava določa kolektivno odgovornost za odločitve, ki jih je sprejela ukrajinska vlada,
M. whereas the Constitution of Ukraine provides for collective responsibility for the decisions that the Ukrainian Government makes,
N. ker EU še naprej poudarja, da je treba spoštovati načela pravne države, ki vključuje poštene, nepristranske in neodvisne sodne postopke, in se obenem izogibati nevarnemu vtisu, da se sodni ukrepi uporabljajo selektivno; ker EU meni, da so ta načela še posebej pomembna v državi, ki želi skleniti globlja pogodbena razmerja, ki temeljijo na političnem združevanju,
N. whereas the EU continues to emphasise the need for respect to be shown for the rule of law, incorporating fair, impartial and independent legal processes, while avoiding the danger of giving rise to any perception that judicial measures are being used selectively; whereas the EU considers these principles especially important in a country which aspires to enter into a deeper contractual relationship based on a political association,
3. opozarja ukrajinske oblasti, da načelo kolektivne odgovornosti za odločitve vlade ne dovoljuje pregona posameznih članov vlade zaradi odločitev, ki so bile sprejete soglasno;
Reminds the Ukrainian authorities that the principle of collective responsibility for the decisions of the government does not permit the prosecution of individual members of the government for decisions that were taken collegially;
5. poudarja dejstvo, da sta krepitev načela pravne države in verodostojen boj proti korupciji bistvena ne samo za sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma ter poglobitev odnosov med EU in Ukrajino na splošno, ampak tudi za utrditev demokracije v Ukrajini;
Underlines the fact that strengthening of the rule of law and a credible fight against corruption are essential not only for the conclusion of the Association Agreement and the deepening of EU-Ukraine relations in general, but also for the consolidation of democracy in Ukraine;
o prenovi madžarske ustave
on the Revised Hungarian Constitution
PE465.702v01-00 } PE465.705v01-00 } PE465.713v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o prenovi madžarske ustave
PE465.702v01-00 } PE465.705v01-00 } PE465.713v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the Revised Hungarian Constitution
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 3, 4, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ki obravnavajo spoštovanje, spodbujanje in zaščito temeljnih pravic,
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which deal with respect for and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights,
– ob upoštevanju madžarske ustave, ki jo je 18. aprila 2011 sprejel parlament Republike Madžarske in bo začela veljati 1. januarja 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu: nova ustava),
– having regard to the Basic Law of Hungary, adopted on 18 April 2011 by the National Assembly of the Hungarian Republic that will enter into force on 1 January 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the new Constitution’),
– ob upoštevanju predloga resolucije št. 12490 o resnem nazadovanju na področjih pravne države in človekovih pravic na Madžarskem, ki je bila 25. januarja 2011 vložena v parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope,
– having regard to motion for resolution No 12490 on serious setbacks in the fields of the rule of law and human rights in Hungary tabled on 25 January 2011 in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe,
– ob upoštevanju sodbe št. 30141/04 Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (Schalk in Kopf proti Avstriji), zlasti njenih postranskih razlogov,
– having regard to the ruling No 30141/04 of the European Court of Human Rights (Schalk and Kopf vs. Austria), and particularly its obiter dicta ,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor Evropskega parlamenta o novi madžarski ustavi ter izjav Sveta in Komisije o njeni prenovi in nadaljnje razprave, ki je potekala 8. junija,
- having regard to the Oral Questions tabled in the European Parliament on the new Hungarian Constitution and to the Council and Commission statements on the revised Hungarian constitution and following the debate held on 8 June 2011,
A. ker Evropska unija temelji na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države, kot je določeno v členu 2 PEU, na nedvoumnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, kot je zapisano v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, ter na priznavanju pravne vrednosti teh pravic, svoboščin in načel, kar bo Evropska unija še dodatno podkrepila z bližnjim pristopom k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU, on unequivocal respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the ECHR, and on the recognition of the legal value of said rights, freedoms and principles, which is further demonstrated by the EU’s forthcoming accession to the ECHR,
B. ker je Madžarska podpisala Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah, Mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter druge mednarodne pravne instrumente, ki jo zavezujejo k spoštovanju in izvajanju načel o delitvi oblasti, medsebojnemu institucionalnem nadzoru vej oblasti ter spodbujanju demokracije in človekovih pravic,
B. whereas Hungary has signed the ECHR, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other international legal instruments obliging it to respect and implement principles concerning the separation of powers, the implementation of institutional checks and balances and the promotion of democracy and human rights,
C. ker sta priprava in sprejetje nove ustave sicer v pristojnosti držav članic, vendar so sedanje države članice, države, ki se pridružujejo, ter Evropska unija dolžne zagotoviti, da so vsebina in postopki v skladu z vrednotami EU, Listino temeljnih pravic, Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah ter da črka in duh sprejetih ustav niso v nasprotju s temi vrednotami in instrumenti; ker se to jasno kaže v dejstvu, da so morale številne sedanje države članice EU svojo ustavo pred pristopom k EU pregledati in spremeniti ali jo prilagoditi kasnejšim zahtevam pogodb EU, zlasti na zahtevo Komisije;
C. whereas, while the drafting and the adoption of a new constitution falls within the remit of Member States’ competences, Member States, current and acceding, and the EU have a duty to ensure that the contents and processes are in conformity with EU values, the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the ECHR, and that the letter and spirit of adopted constitutions do not contradict these values and instruments; whereas this is clearly demonstrated by the fact that a number of current EU Member States had to review and amend their constitutions to ensure accession to the EU or adapt their constitutions to subsequent EU treaty requirements, notably at the request of the Commission,
D. ker proces oblikovanja madžarske ustave ni bil pregleden in sta bili priprava ter sprejetje nove ustave končana v izjemno kratkem časovnem obdobju, ki ni omogočalo dovolj časa za temeljito in vsebinsko javno razpravo o osnutku besedila, ter ker bi morala uspešna in legitimna ustava temeljiti na čim širšem soglasju,
D. whereas the constitution-making process lacked transparency and the drafting and adoption of the new Constitution was conducted in an exceptionally short time frame that did not allow sufficient time for a thorough and substantial public debate on the draft text; and whereas a successful and legitimate constitution should be based on the largest consensus possible,
E. ker so ustavo močno kritizirale nacionalne, evropske in mednarodne nevladne ter druge organizacije, Beneška komisija ter predstavniki vlad držav članic, sprejeta pa je bila izključno na podlagi glasov poslancev iz vladajočih strank, tako da ni bilo doseženo politično in družbeno soglasje,
E. whereas the Constitution has been widely criticised by national, European and international NGOs and organisations, the Venice Commission and representatives of Member States’ governments, and was adopted exclusively with the votes of the MPs from the governing parties, so that no political or social consensus was achieved,
F. ker je podobno kot Beneška komisija tudi Evropski parlament zaskrbljen zlasti glede preglednosti, odprtosti, vključenosti in časovnega okvira postopka sprejetja ter glede slabitve sistema zavor in ravnovesij, zlasti določb, ki se nanašajo na ustavno sodišče, sodišča in sodnike, kar bi lahko ogrozilo neodvisnost madžarskega pravosodja,
F. whereas the European Parliament shares the concerns voiced by the Venice Commission, particularly regarding the transparency, openness and inclusiveness of and the time frame for the adoption process, and regarding the weakening of the system of checks and balances, in particular the provisions concerning the Constitutional Court and the courts and judges that may put the independence of the Hungarian judiciary at risk,
G. ker nova ustava ne določa izrecno številnih načel, ki jih mora Madžarska spoštovati in spodbujati na podlagi svojih pravno zavezujočih mednarodnih obveznosti, kot so prepoved smrtne kazni in dosmrtne zaporne kazni brez možnosti pogojne izpustitve, prepoved razlikovanja na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti ter opustitve ali omejevanja temeljnih pravic s posebno pravno ureditvijo,
G. whereas the new Constitution fails to explicitly lay down a number of principles which Hungary, stemming from its legally binding international obligations, is obliged to respect and promote, such as the ban on the death penalty and life imprisonment without parole, the prohibition on discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation and the suspension or restriction of fundamental rights by means of special legal orders,
H. ker nova ustava prek vrednot, ki so v njej zapisane, in z nejasno ubeseditvijo pri opredeljevanju osnovnih pojmov, kot so družina in pravica do življenja od trenutka spočetja, ustvarja tveganje za razlikovanje nekaterih skupin v družbi, tj. etničnih, verskih in spolnih manjšin, enostarševskih družin, oseb, ki živijo v civilnem partnerstvu, in žensk,
H. whereas the new Constitution, through the values it enshrines and its unclear wording when defining basic notions such as ‘family’ and the right to life from the moment of conception, creates the risk of discrimination against certain groups in society, namely ethnic, religious and sexual minorities, single-parent families, people living in civil partnerships and women,
I. ker bi lahko nejasno besedilo preambule, zlasti delov o obveznosti Madžarske kot države do madžarskih etničnih pripadnikov v tujini, ustvarilo pravno podlago za ukrepe, ki bi jih sosednje države štele za poseganje v njihove notranje zadeve, kar bi lahko povzročilo naraščanje napetosti v tej regiji,
I. whereas the unclear wording of the preamble, particularly the parts concerning the Hungarian state’s obligations towards ethnic Hungarians living abroad, may create a legal basis for actions that neighbouring countries would consider as interference in their internal affairs, which may lead to tensions in the region,