natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Komisija in države članice so tudi pozvane, naj preučijo, kako bi lahko izboljšale zakonodajo in praktične podporne ukrepe za zaščito žrtev.
It also calls on the Commission and the Member States to examine how to improve legislation on and practical support measures for the protection of victims.
Ta direktiva predstavlja del skladnega in celovitega sklopa ukrepov v zvezi s pravicami žrtev.
This Directive forms part of a coherent and comprehensive set of measures on victims' rights.
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji
The resolution of the European Parliament of
V skupnem območju pravice brez notranjih meja je treba zagotoviti, da se zaščita
In a common area of justice without internal borders, it is necessary to ensure that the protection provided to a
osebe, zagotovljena v eni državi članici, ohrani in nadaljuje v kateri koli drugi državi članici, v katero se oseba preseli oziroma se je preselila.
person in one Member State is maintained and continued in any other Member State to which the person moves or has moved.
Treba bi bilo tudi zagotoviti, da državljani Unije zaradi legitimnega uveljavljanja svoje pravice do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic v skladu s členom 3(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členom 21 PDEU ne bi izgubili
It should also be ensured that the legitimate exercise by citizens of the Union of their right to move and reside freely within the territory of Member States, in accordance with Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and Article 21 of the TFEU, does not result in a loss of their
Za dosego teh ciljev bi morala biti v tej direktivi določena pravila, s katerimi se lahko zaščita, ki izhaja iz
In order to attain these objectives, this Directive should set out rules whereby the protection stemming from
odloči prebivati ali zadrževati
decides to reside or stay
(„država izvršiteljica“).
(‘the executing State’).▌
V tej direktivi so upoštevane različne pravne tradicije držav članic pa tudi dejstvo, da se lahko učinkovita zaščita zagotovi tudi z odredbo o zaščiti, ki jo izda organ, ki ni kazensko sodišče.
This Directive takes account of the different legal traditions of the Member States as well as the fact that effective protection can be provided by means of protection orders taken by an authority other than a criminal court.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, katerih namen je zaščita osebe pred kaznivim dejanjem druge osebe, ki lahko na kakršen koli način ogrozi njeno življenje, telesno in duševno celovitost ali spolno nedotakljivost, npr. s preprečevanjem vseh oblik nadlegovanja, ter njeno dostojanstvo in osebno svobodo, npr. s preprečevanjem ugrabitev, zalezovanja in drugih oblik posredne prisile, pa tudi preprečevanje novih kaznivih dejanj oziroma zmanjšanje posledic prejšnjih kaznivih dejanj.
This Directive applies to protection measures which aim at protecting a person against a criminal act of another person which may, in any way, endanger his or her life, physical, psychological and sexual integrity, such as by preventing any form of harassment, as well as his or her dignity or personal liberty, such as by preventing abductions, stalking and other forms of indirect coercion, and aiming at avoiding new acts of crime or at reducing the consequences of previous acts of crime.
Te osebne pravice zaščitene osebe ustrezajo temeljnim vrednotam, ki se priznavajo in podpirajo v vseh državah članicah.
These personal rights of the protected person amount to fundamental values recognised and upheld in all Member States.
Ta direktiva se uporablja za zaščitne ukrepe, neodvisno od narave – kazenske, civilne ali upravne – sodnega ali enakovrednega organa, ki sprejme zadevno odločbo bodisi v okviru kazenskih postopkov ali v okviru vseh drugih postopkov v zvezi z dejanjem, ki je bilo ali bi lahko bilo predmet postopkov pred sodiščem, pristojnim zlasti za kazenske zadeve.
This Directive applies to protection measures, independently of the nature − criminal, civil or administrative − of the judicial or equivalent authority that adopts the decision concerned, be it in the context of criminal proceedings or in the context of any other proceedings with regard to an act which has been or could have been the object of proceedings by a court having jurisdiction in particular in criminal matters.
Ta direktiva je namenjena uporabi zaščitnih ukrepov v korist žrtev ali morebitnih žrtev kaznivih dejanj in se ne bi smela uporabljati za ukrepe, izdane z namenom zaščite prič.
This Directive is intended to apply to protection measures issued in favour of victims, or possible victims, of crimes; it should not apply to measures issued with a view to witness protection.
Če je zaščitni ukrep, kot je opredeljen v tej direktivi, izdan za zaščito sorodnika glavne zaščitene osebe, se lahko za evropsko odredbo o zaščiti zaprosi in se jo izda tudi za sorodnika, v skladu s pogoji iz te direktive.
If a protection measure, as defined in this Directive, is issued for the protection of a relative of the main protected person, a European protection order may also be requested by and issued with regard to this relative, subject to the conditions laid down in this Directive.
Vsako prošnjo za izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti bi bilo treba obravnavati dovolj hitro, ob upoštevanju posebnih okoliščin zadeve, vključno z njeno nujnostjo, predvidenim datumom prihoda zaščitene osebe na ozemlje države izvršiteljice in če je možno, stopnjo ogroženosti zaščitene osebe.
Any request for the issuing of a European protection order should be treated with adequate speed taking into consideration the specific circumstances of the case, including the urgency of the matter, the date foreseen for the arrival of the protected person on the territory of the executing State and, where possible, the degree of risk for the protected person.
Kadar se v skladu s to direktivo informacijo posreduje povzročitelju nevarnosti ali zaščiteni osebi, bi bilo treba to informacijo posredovati tudi morebitnemu skrbniku ali zastopniku zadevne osebe, kjer je to ustrezno.
Where information is to be provided under this Directive to the person causing danger or to the protected person, this information should also be provided to the guardian or to the representative of the person concerned where relevant.
Pristojne oblasti bi morale v postopku za izdajo in priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti ustrezno pozornost posvetiti potrebam žrtev, zlasti ranljivih oseb, kot so mladoletniki in invalidne osebe.
In the procedures for the issuing and recognition of a European Protection order, competent authorities should give appropriate consideration to the needs of victims, including particularly vulnerable persons, such as. minors or persons with disabilities.
Za uporabo te direktive je morda uveden zaščitni ukrep v skladu s sodbo, opredeljeno v členu 2
For the application of This Directive, a protection measure may have been imposed following a judgment, as defined by Article 2 of Council
Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/947/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in pogojnih odločb zaradi zagotavljanja nadzorstva nad spremljevalnimi ukrepi in alternativnimi sankcijami UL L 337, 16.12.2008, str.
Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions OJ L 337, 16.12.2008, p.
ali v skladu z odločbo o nadzornih ukrepih, opredeljeno v členu 4
or following a decision on supervision measures as defined in Article 4 of
Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2009/829/PNZ z dne 23. oktobra 2009 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu UL L 294, 11.11.2009, str.
Council Framework Decision 2009/829/JHA of 23 October 2009 on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention OJ L 294, 11.11.2009, p.
V skladu s členom 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter odstavkom 2 člena 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah bi bilo treba povzročitelju nevarnosti omogočiti, da je zaslišan in da izpodbija zaščitni ukrep, bodisi med postopkom, ki vodi k sprejetju zaščitnega ukrepa, bodisi pred izdajo evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
In conformity with Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and with Article 47, paragraph 2, of the Charter on Fundamental Rights of the European Union, the person causing danger should be provided, either in the procedure leading to the adoption of a protection measure or before issuing a European protection order, with the possibility to be heard and to challenge the protection measure.
Da bi se preprečilo, da bi bilo proti žrtvi v državi izvršiteljici storjeno kaznivo dejanje ali novo kaznivo dejanje, bi bilo treba tej državi ponuditi pravno podlago za priznanje odločbe, ki je bila predhodno sprejeta v korist žrtve v državi izdajateljici, hkrati pa tudi preprečiti, da bi morala žrtev v državi izvršiteljici sprožiti nov postopek ali predložiti dokaze, kot da država izdajateljica ni sprejela odločbe.
In order to prevent a crime or new crime being committed against the victim in the executing State, that State should be given a legal basis for recognising the decision previously adopted in the issuing State in favour of the victim, while also avoiding the need for the victim to start new proceedings or to produce evidence in the executing State again as if the issuing State had not adopted the decision.
Priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti s strani države izvršiteljice med drugim pomeni, da pristojni organ te države ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive sprejema obstoj in veljavnost zaščitnega ukrepa, sprejetega v državi izdajateljici, prizna dejansko stanje, opisano v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, in soglaša, da bi bilo treba zagotoviti zaščito in jo tudi neprekinjeno zagotavljati v skladu z njegovo nacionalno zakonodajo.
The recognition of the European protection order by the executing State implies inter alia that the competent authority of that State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive, accepts the existence and validity of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State, acknowledges the factual situation described in the European protection order, and agrees that protection should be provided and should be continued to be provided in accordance with its national law.
Ta direktiva vsebuje zaključeno število obveznosti oziroma prepovedi, ki morajo, če so bile uvedene v državi izdajateljici in so vsebovane v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, biti priznane in se morajo izvajati v državi izvršiteljici ob upoštevanju omejitev iz te direktive.
This Directive contains a closed number of obligations or prohibitions which, when imposed in the issuing State and contained in the European protection order, should be recognised and enforced in the executing State, subject to the limitations set out in this Directive.
Druge vrste zaščitnih ukrepov lahko obstajajo na nacionalni ravni, kot je, če to predpisuje nacionalna zakonodaja, dolžnost povzročitelja nevarnosti, da ostane v določenem kraju.
Other types of protection measures may exist at national level, such as, if provided by national law, the obligation on the person causing danger to remain in a specified place.
Ker so v državah članicah za izdajo in izvajanje zaščitnih ukrepov pristojni različni organi (civilni, kazenski ali upravni), se zdi primerno v tej direktivi zagotoviti visoko stopnjo prožnosti v mehanizmu sodelovanja med državami članicami.
Since in the Member States different kind of authorities (civil, criminal or administrative) are competent to issue and enforce protection measures, it seems appropriate to provide a high degree of flexibility in the cooperation mechanism between the Member States under this Directive.
Pristojnemu organu države izvršiteljice zato ni treba v vseh primerih sprejeti enakega zaščitnega ukrepa, kot je sprejet v državi izdajateljici, in ima določeno stopnjo diskrecije, da sprejme kateri koli ukrep, za katerega meni, da je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ustrezen v podobnem primeru in primeren za zagotavljanje neprekinjene zaščite zadevne osebe z vidika zaščitnega ukrepa, ki je sprejet v državi izdajateljici in kot je opisan v evropski odredbi o zaščiti.
Therefore, the competent authority in the executing State does not in all cases have to take the same protection measure as adopted in the issuing State, but it has a degree of discretion to adopt any measure which it would deem adequate and appropriate under its national law in a similar case in order to provide continued protection to the protected person in the light of the protection measure adopted in the issuing State, and as described in the European protection order.
Obveznosti oziroma prepovedi, na katere se ta direktiva nanaša, med drugim obsegajo ukrepe, katerih cilj je omejitev osebnih stikov ali stikov na daljavo med zaščiteno osebo in povzročiteljem nevarnosti, npr. z določitvijo nekaterih pogojev za takšne stike ali z uvedbo omejitev glede vsebine komunikacije.
The obligations or prohibitions to which this Directive applies include, among others, measures aimed at limiting personal or remote contacts between the protected person and the person causing danger, for example by imposing certain conditions on such contacts or imposing restrictions on the contents of communications.
Pristojni organ države izvršiteljice bi moral obvestiti povzročitelja nevarnosti, pristojni organ države izdajateljice in zaščiteno osebo o vsakem ukrepu, ki se sprejme na podlagi evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
The competent authority of the executing State should inform the person causing danger, the competent authority of the issuing State and the protected person of any measure taken on the basis of the European protection order.
V uradnem obvestilu povzročitelju nevarnosti bi bilo treba ustrezno upoštevati interes zaščitene osebe in ne razkriti njenega naslova ali drugih kontaktnih podatkov.
In the notification of the person causing danger due regard should be taken of the interest of the protected person in not having his or her address or other contact details disclosed.
Takšne podatke bi bilo treba izločiti iz uradnega obvestila, pod pogojem, da naslov ali drugi kontaktni podatki niso zajeti v obveznostih oziroma prepovedih, ki so kot izvršilni ukrep naložene povzročitelju nevarnosti.
Such details should be excluded from the notification, provided that the address or other contact details are not comprised in the obligation or prohibition imposed as an enforcement measure on the person causing danger.
Ko pristojni organ države izdajateljice prekliče evropsko odredbo o zaščiti, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice ustaviti ukrepe, ki jih je sprejel za izvršitev evropske odredbe o zaščiti, pri čemer se razume, da lahko pristojni organ v državi izvršiteljici – samostojno, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo – sprejme kakršen koli zaščitni ukrep v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo za zaščito zadevne osebe.
When the competent authority in the issuing State has withdrawn the European protection order, the competent authority in the executing State should end the measures which it has adopted in order to enforce the European protection order, it being understood that the competent authority in the executing State may - autonomously, according to its national law - adopt any protection measure under its national law in order to protect the person concerned.
Ker so v tej direktivi obravnavani primeri, pri katerih je zaščitena oseba tista, ki se preseli v drugo državo članico, izvajanje njenih določb ne pomeni prenosa pooblastil na državo izvršiteljico v zvezi z glavno, odloženo, drugačno, pogojno ali sekundarno kaznijo ali varnostnim ukrepom, izrečenim zoper povzročitelja nevarnosti, če ta še naprej prebiva v državi, ki je izdala zaščitni ukrep.
Given that this Directive deals with situations in which the protected person moves to another Member State, executing its provisions does not imply any transfer to the executing State of powers relating to principal, suspended, alternative, conditional or secondary penalties, or relating to security measures imposed on the person causing danger, if the latter continues to reside in the State that issued the protection measure.
Po potrebi bi morali ukrepi, sprejeti pri izvajanju te direktive, v praksi biti uveljavljeni elektronsko, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom in postopki.
Where appropriate, it should be possible to use electronic means with a view to putting into practice the measures adopted in application of this Directive, in accordance with national laws and procedures.
V okviru sodelovanja med organi, vključenimi v zagotavljanje zaščite zadevne osebe, bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice sporočiti vsako kršitev ukrepov, sprejetih v državi izvršiteljici z namenom izvrševanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti.
In the framework of cooperation among the authorities involved in ensuring the safeguard of the protected person, the competent authority of the executing State should communicate to the competent authority of the issuing State any breach of the measures adopted in the executing State with a view to executing the European protection order.
Takšen odziv lahko po potrebi vključuje uvedbo ukrepa odvzema prostosti namesto prvotno sprejetega ukrepa brez odvzema prostosti, npr. kot alternativo preventivnemu priporu ali kot posledico pogojne odložitve kazni.
Such reaction may comprise, where appropriate, the imposition of a custodial measure in substitution of the non-custodial measure originally adopted, for example as an alternative to preventive detention or as a consequence of conditional suspension of a penalty.
Razumljivo je, da takšna odločitev, ki ne pomeni nove uvedbe kazenske sankcije v zvezi z novim kaznivim dejanjem, ne posega v možnost države izvršiteljice, da v primeru kršitve ukrepov, sprejetih za izvrševanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, kjer je primerno, naloži kazenske ali nekazenske sankcije.
It is understood that such decision, since it does not consist in the imposition ex novo of a criminal sanction in relation to a new criminal offence, does not interfere with the possibility that the executing State may, where applicable, impose criminal or non-criminal sanctions in the event of breach of the measures adopted in order to execute the European protection order.
Glede na različne pravne tradicije držav članic bi moral pristojni organ države izvršiteljice, če v tej državi ni nobenega zaščitnega ukrepa za primer, podoben dejanskemu stanju, opredeljenemu v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, poročati pristojnemu organu države izdajateljice o vsaki kršitvi zaščitnega ukrepa, opredeljenega v evropski odredbi o zaščiti, s katero je seznanjen.
Considering the different legal traditions of the Member States, where no protection measure would be available in the executing State in a case similar to the factual situation described in the European protection order, the competent authority of the executing State should report any breach of the protection measure described in the European protection order of which it is aware to the competent authority of the issuing State.
Za nemoteno uporabo te direktive v vseh posameznih primerih bi morali pristojni organi države izdajateljice in države izvršiteljice svoje pristojnosti izvajati v skladu z določbami te direktive in ob upoštevanju načela ne bis in idem.
In order to achieve the smooth application of this Directive in each particular case, the competent authorities of the issuing and the executing States should exercise their competencies in conformity with the provisions of this Directive, taking into account the principle of ne bis in idem.
Zaščitena oseba ne bi smela nositi stroškov za priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, ki bi bili nesorazmerni v primerjavi s podobnim nacionalnim primerom.
The protected person should not be required to sustain costs for the recognition of the European protection order which are disproportionate with respect to a similar national case.
Države članice bi morale pri izvajanju te direktive zagotoviti, da zaščitena oseba po priznanju in kot neposredna posledica priznanja evropske odredbe o zaščiti ne bi bila dolžna začeti novih postopkov na nacionalni ravni, da bi od izvršilnega organa prejela odločbo o sprejetju ukrepov, ki so v skladu z njegovo nacionalno zakonodajo na voljo za podobne primere zaščite zaščitene osebe.
When implementing this Directive, Member States should ensure that, after and as a direct consequence of the recognition of the European protection order, the protected person should not be required to initiate further national proceedings to obtain from the executing authority the decision adopting any measure that would be available under its national law in a similar case in order to ensure the safeguard of the protected person.
Ob upoštevanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja, na katerem temelji ta direktiva, bi morale države članice v največji možni meri spodbujati neposredne stike med pristojnimi organi pri izvajanju tega instrumenta.
Bearing in mind the principle of mutual recognition on which this Directive is based, Member States should promote to the widest extent possible direct contact between the competent authorities in the application of this instrument.
Brez poseganja v pravosodno neodvisnost in raznolikost sodnih sistemov po Uniji bi morale države članice razmisliti o tem, da ustanove, ki so pristojne za usposabljanje sodnikov, tožilcev, policijskih delavcev in delavcev v pravosodju, ki sodelujejo v postopkih za izdajo in priznanje evropske odredbe o zaščiti, zaprosijo za ustrezno usposabljanje v skladu s cilji te direktive.
Without prejudice to judicial independence and differences in the organisation of the judiciary across the Union, Member States should consider requesting those responsible for the training of judges, prosecutors, police and judicial staff involved in the procedures aiming at issuing or recognising a European protection order to provide appropriate training with respect to the objectives of this Directive.
Države članice bi morale z namenom, da zagotovijo ocenjevanje uporabe te direktive, sporočiti Komisiji ustrezne podatke o izvajanju nacionalnih postopkov po evropski odredbi o zaščiti in vsaj o številu zaprošenih, izdanih in/ali priznanih evropskih odredb o zaščiti.
In order to facilitate the evaluation of the application of this Directive, Member States should communicate to the Commission relevant data related to the application of national procedures on the European protection order, at least on the number of European protection orders requested, issued and/or recognised.
Ker cilja te direktive, in sicer zaščititi ogrožene osebe, države članice same zaradi čezmejne narave zadevnih primerov ne morejo v zadostni meri doseči in bi bil cilj zaradi obsega in morebitnega vpliva lažje dosežen na ravni Unije, lahko Unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 PEU.
Since the objective of this Directive, namely to protect persons who are in danger, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States alone, given the cross-border nature of the situations involved, and can therefore by reason of the scale and effects be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the TEU.
Skladno z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvira, potrebnega za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve that objective.