natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C. ker s predlagano pogodbo demokratično izvoljene vlade ne bodo več odločale o fiskalni politiki in te odločitve ne bodo več pod demokratičnim nadzorom prebivalcev Evrope, vključno z nacionalnimi parlamenti, ter se bo oblikoval trajni okvir varčevalnih ukrepov;
C. whereas the proposed Treaty will remove fiscal policy choices from democratically elected governments of Member States and democratic control by the peoples of Europe, including by the national parliaments, and will establish a permanent austerity framework;
D. ker nezaupanje ljudi v države članice in institucije EU še vedno narašča, kar vodi v pomanjkanje legitimnosti EU;
D. whereas the crisis of confidence between people in EU Member States and the EU institutions continues to grow, leading to a crisis of legitimacy for the EU;
E. ker se ta sporazum ni oblikoval po preglednem postopku, saj ni bilo demokratičnega nadzora, ki naj bi bil običajen pri vsaki reformi Unije;
E. whereas the process which led to this agreement has not been transparent thereby ignoring the democratic scrutiny that should normally characterise any reform of the Union;
F. ker so vlade po vsej Evropi sprejele navodila finančnih trgov in zato svoje politične predloge prilagodile izključno zadovoljevanju teh trgov;
F. whereas governments across Europe have accepted the diktats of the financial markets and have therefore oriented their policy proposals entirely towards satisfying the markets;
G. ker brez popolnega sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov ni mogoče uvesti nobenih večjih sprememb politike EU;
G. whereas any major EU policy changes cannot be undertaken without the full involvement of the EU and national parliaments;
H. ker vse več ljudi politike EU dojema kot grožnjo njihovi ekonomski in socialni blaginji, kot vir naraščajoče negotovosti njihovih delovnih mest in dohodkov, kot pospeševalca neenakosti in krivic ter oviro za demokratičen nadzor ljudi nad njihovim življenjem;
H. whereas the people increasingly perceive EU policies as being a threat to their economic and social well-being, as a source of increasing insecurity for their work and income, as a promoter of inequality and injustice and as an obstacle to people’s democratic control over their own lives;
6. opozarja, da dolžniška kriza nekaterim državam članicam koristi ter da je k neprimerni razporeditvi produktivnih virov in nastanku ekonomskega balona močno prispevala usmerjenost nekaterih držav članic k uvozu; poziva te države, naj več prispevajo k reševanju te krize; poziva države članice, naj uvedejo mehanizme, ki temeljijo na solidarnosti in sorazmernosti;
Reminds that some Member States are benefitting from the sovereign debt crisis, recalls that the export orientation led by some Member States contributed strongly to the misallocation of productive resources and the creation of economic bubbles and calls on these countries to make a bigger contribution to solving the crisis; calls on the Member States to introduce mechanisms based on solidarity and proportionality;
14. ugotavlja, da je za vsako spremembo irske ustave potreben referendum in da so proračunske pristojnosti z irsko ustavo podeljene irskemu parlamentu in vladi, ter da je zato v primeru prenosa proračunskih pristojnosti potrebna sprememba ustave;
Notes that any change to the Irish constitution requires a referendum, and that budgetary powers are vested by the Irish constitution in the Irish Parliament and Government, therefore necessitating an amendment of the constitution in the event of any transfer of budgetary powers;
o zasedanju Evropskega sveta 30. januarja 2012
on the European Council of 30 January 2012
PE479.465v01-00 B7‑0044/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zasedanju Evropskega sveta dne 30. januarja 2012
PE479.465v01-00 B7‑0044/2012 European Parliament resolution on the European Council of 30 January 2012
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 30. januarja 2012,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 30 January 2012,
– ob upoštevanju stališča vlade ZK,
– having regard to the position of the UK government,
– ob upoštevanju t.i. šesterčka in dveh predlogov Komisije o dodatni krepitvi fiskalne discipline Uredba o okrepitvi gospodarskega in proračunskega nadzora v državah članicah ( COM(2011)0819 ) in Uredba o skupnih določbah za spremljanje in ocenjevanje osnutkov proračunskih načrtov ( COM(2011)0821 ).
– having regard to the ‘Six-Pack’ and the two Commission proposals on further strengthening fiscal discipline Regulation on the strengthening of the economic and budgetary surveillance of Member States, ( COM(2011)0819 ), and Regulation on common provisions for monitoring and assessing draft budgetary plans, ( COM(2011)0821 ).
– ob upoštevanju izjave predsednika Komisije na srečanju 18. januarja 2012,
– having regard to the declaration made by the President of the Commission at its session on 18 January 2012,
– ob upoštevanju izida pogajanj v ad hoc delovni skupini Euroskupine in Euroskupini,
– having regard to the outcome of the negotiations held in the ad hoc Euro Working Group and the Euro Group,
– ob upoštevanju potrebe po ohranitvi enotnosti med pogodbenicami iz euroobmočja in tistimi, ki niso članice euroobmočja,
– having regard to the need to preserve unity between euro area and non euro area contracting parties,
– ob upoštevanju vloge, ki so jo v imenu Parlamenta podali predstavniki v ad hoc delovni skupini,
– having regard to the submission made on behalf of Parliament by its representatives in the ad hoc working group,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. januarja 2012 o osnutku mednarodnega sporazuma o stabilnosti, usklajevanju in upravljanju v ekonomski in monetarni uniji,
– having regard to its Resolution of 18 January 2012 on the draft International Agreement on stability, coordination and governance in EMU,
3. meni, da je končno besedilo v več točkah boljše od izvirnega in da so bile na predlog Parlamenta vključene številne spremembe, predvsem naslednje:
Believes that the final text improves in several points on the original text and that a number of the modifications proposed by Parliament have been incorporated, in particular:
– zaveza, da se bo metoda Skupnosti v celoti uporabljala;
– an undertaking that the Community method will fully apply;
– stabilnost, usklajevanje in upravljanje bo izvedeno s pomočjo sekundarne zakonodaje, pri čemer bo Parlament v celoti vključen;
– that stability, coordination and governance will be implemented via secondary legislation, fully involving Parliament;
– večja, četudi nepopolna, skladnost med t.i. šesterčkom in novo pogodbo;
– greater, although incomplete, coherence between the ‘six pack’ and the new Treaty;
– priznanje, da imajo pogodbenice, katerih valuta ni euro, pravico sodelovati pri tistih delih vrhunskih srečanj euroobmočja, ki obravnavajo konkurenčnost, globalno arhitekturo euroobmočja in temeljna pravila, ki bodo veljala v prihodnje;
– recognition of the rights of contracting parties whose currency is not the euro to take part in those parts of the euro summit meetings dealing with competitiveness, the global architecture of the euro area and the fundamental rules that will apply to it in future;
– sodelovanje med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti je predvideno na podlagi vzajemnega dogovora in v skladu s Pogodbo;
– cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments is foreseen on a mutually agreed basis and in accordance with the Treaty;
– doda se referenca na cilje trajnostne rasti, zaposlovanja, konkurenčnosti in socialne kohezije;
– the addition of a reference to the objectives of sustainable growth, employment, competitiveness and social cohesion;
– zaveza, da se bo vsebina sporazuma v petih letih vključila v pravni okvir EU;
– a commitment to incorporate the content of the Agreement into the EU legal framework within five years;
6. poleg vrste ukrepov za zagotavljanje fiskalne stabilnosti zahteva tudi oblikovanje projektnih obveznic, načrt za obveznice stabilnosti ter uvedbo davka na finančne transakcije na evropski ravni v skladu z že podanim predlogom Komisije;
Further to the series of measures to ensure fiscal stability, calls now for the establishment of project bonds, a roadmap for stability bonds and the introduction of an FTT at European level, for which the Commission has already made a proposal;
– izogibanje dvojnim merilom med predpisi v sporazumu in tistimi iz Lizbonske pogodbe in pravnega reda Skupnosti;
– the avoidance of double standards between the norms in the Agreement and those in the Lisbon Treaty and contained in the acquis communautaire;
– vse podpisnice sporazuma, sedanje in prihodnje članice euroobmočja, bi morale imeti pravico do enakopravnega sodelovanja na vseh vrhunskih srečanjih euroobmočja;
– all the contracting parties to the agreement, present and future members of the euro, should have the same right to fully participate in all euro summit meetings;
10. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje voditeljem držav in vlad, predsedniku Evropskega sveta, predsedniku Euroskupine, nacionalnim parlamentom, Komisiji in Evropski centralni banki.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Heads of State and Government, the President of the European Council, the President of the Eurogroup, the national parliaments, the Commission and the European Central Bank.
o osnutku Uredbe Komisije o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 glede seznama prehranskih trditev
on the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 with regard to the list of nutrition claims
PE479.466v01-00 B7‑0045/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o osnutku Uredbe Komisije o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 glede seznama prehranskih trditev
PE479.466v01-00 B7‑0045/2012 European Parliament resolution on the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 with regard to the list of nutrition claims
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih UL L 404, 30.12.2006, str.
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods OJ L 404, 30.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Komisije o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 glede seznama prehranskih trditev,
– having regard to the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) 1924/2006 with regard to the list of nutrition claims,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja, ki ga je 13. oktobra 2011 predložil odbor iz člena 25 Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006,
– having regard to the opinion delivered on 13 October 2011 by the committee referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (EU) št. 1169/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom UL L 304, 22.11.2011, str.
– having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p.
– ob upoštevanju člena 5a(3)(b) Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
– having regard to Article 5a(3)(b) of the Council Decision of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
A. ker v skladu s členom 3 Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 uporaba prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditev ne sme biti napačna, dvoumna ali zavajajoča;
A. whereas, as stated in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the use of nutrition and health claims must not be false, ambiguous or misleading;
B. ker je lahko v skladu s členom 5(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 uporaba prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditev dovoljena le, če se lahko pričakuje, da bo povprečen potrošnik razumel v trditvi navedene pozitivne učinke;
B. whereas, as stated in Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, the use of nutrition and health claims can only be permitted if the average consumer can be expected to understand the beneficial effects as expressed in the claim;
C. ker morajo v skladu s členom 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 primerjalne prehranske trditve primerjati sestavo zadevnega živila z vrsto drugih živil, ki spadajo v isto kategorijo, tudi živil drugih znamk;
C. whereas, as stated in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, comparative nutrition claims must compare the composition of the food in question with a range of foods of the same category, including foods of other brands;
D. ker v skladu s členom 7 Uredbe (EU) 1169/2011 podatki o hrani potrošnika ne smejo zavajati glede narave, lastnosti in značilnosti posameznega živila;
D. whereas, as stated in Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 1169/2011, food information must not mislead the consumer as to the nature, properties and characteristics of a foodstuff;
E. ker je nova prehranska trditev Komisije „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“, ki naj bi se vključila v prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 1624/2006, glede na osnovna načela, ki urejajo izbiro dovoljenih prehranskih trditev na živilih, kot je navedeno zgoraj, v nasprotju z namenom in vsebino temeljnega instrumenta, saj je za povprečnega potrošnika dvoumna, zavajajoča in nejasna;
E. whereas in the light of the underlying principles governing the selection of permitted nutrition claims on foodstuffs, as outlined above, the new nutrition claim proposed by the Commission ‘now contains X% less of [nutrient]’, to be included in the annex to Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, runs counter to the purpose and content of the basic instrument by being ambiguous, misleading and confusing to the average consumer;
F. ker nova trditev „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“ krši načelo primerjalnih trditev v skladu s členom 9(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006, saj omogoča primerjavo hranilnih vrednosti izdelka z njegovo predhodno različico ne glede na začetno raven hranilne vrednosti zadevnega izdelka, kar bi lahko bilo pretirano visoko v primerjavi z drugimi izdelki na tržišču; ker izdelki z nespremenjeno sestavo, ki kljub temu vsebujejo nižjo raven določene hranilne vrednosti v primerjavi z izdelkom druge znamke s spremenjeno sestavo, ne bodo mogli imeti prehranske trditve, kar bo za potrošnike zagotovo zavajajoče;
F. whereas the newly introduced claim ‘now contains X% less of [nutrient]’ violates the principle of comparative claims, as laid down in Article 9(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006; whereas it allows for the nutritional values of a product to be compared with a previous version of that product, regardless of the starting level of the nutrient in question, which could be excessively high by comparison with other products on the market; whereas products which have not been reformulated, but are nevertheless lower in a certain nutrient than the reformulated product of a different brand, will not be allowed to bear a nutrition claim, and this will inevitably mislead consumers;
G. ker lahko trditev „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“ predstavlja nelojalno konkurenco obstoječim trditvam, kot so „manj [hranila]“ in „lahek“; ker se v zadnjem primeru zahteva znižanje za vsaj 10 % (za mikrohranila), 25 % (za natrij) ali 30 % (za sladkor/maščobe) v primerjavi z drugimi podobnimi izdelki; ker bi lahko potrošnik razumel, da količinska izjava v trditvi „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“ pomeni večje zmanjšanje v primerjavi s trditvama „manj [hranila]“ ali „lahek“, čeprav so zahteve za ti trditvi precej strožje kot za trditev „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“, za katero se zahteva zgolj minimalno 15-odstotno zmanjšanje;
G. whereas the ‘now contains X% less of [nutrient]’ claim might give rise to unfair competition vis-à-vis existing claims, such as ‘reduced [nutrient]’ and ‘light/lite’; whereas in the latter case a reduction of at least 10% (for micronutrients), 25% (for sodium) or 30% (for sugars/fats) by comparison with other similar products is required; whereas a consumer might assume that the quantified statement in the ‘now contains X% less’ claim signifies a greater reduction than that implied by the ‘reduced [nutrient]’ or ‘light’ claims, despite the requirements being much stricter for the latter than for the ‘now contains X% less of [nutrient]’ claim, for which a minimum reduction of just 15% is specified;
H. ker bi lahko trditev „sedaj vsebuje X % manj [hranila]“proizvajalce odvrnila od obsežnejše spremembe sestave njihovih izdelkov, da bi izpolnjevali zahteve za trditvi „manj [hranila]“ ali „lahek“, saj je lažje zmanjšati vsebnost hranila za 15 % kot za 30 %;
H. whereas the ‘now contains X% less of [nutrient]’ claim could act as a disincentive to producers to reformulate their products more substantially in order to meet the requirements for the ‘reduced [nutrient]’ or ‘light’ claims, as it is easier to reduce a nutrient by 15% than by 30%;
I. ker Komisija v uvodni izjavi 4 osnutka ukrepa izrecno priznava, da potrošniki ob zmanjšanju sladkorja pričakujejo zmanjšanje energijske vrednosti; ker Komisija v zvezi s predlogom spremembe trditve „manj maščob/sladkorja“ v skladu s točko 2 priloge k osnutku ukrepa dovoljuje navedbo tovrstnih trditev tudi takrat, kadar je energijska vrednost izdelka z navedeno trditvijo še vedno „enaka“ energijski vrednosti podobnega izdelka;
I. whereas in Recital 4 of the draft measure the Commission clearly acknowledges that ‘when sugars are reduced, consumers expect reduction in energy’; whereas, with regard to the suggested amendment to the ‘reduced fats/sugars’ claim as laid down in point 2 of the annex to the draft measure, the Commission also allows for such claims to be made even when the energy in the product bearing the claim is still ‘equal to’ the energy contained in a similar product;
o potrebi po financiranju sejemskih zmogljivosti za mala in srednja podjetja v evro-sredozemskem območju
on the need to finance SME trade fairs in the Euro-Mediterranean area
PE479.471v01-00 B7‑0046/2012 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o potrebi po financiranju sejemskih zmogljivosti za mala in srednja podjetja v evro-sredozemskem območju
PE479.471v01-00 B7‑0046/2012 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the need to finance SME trade fairs in the Euro-Mediterranean area
– ob upoštevanju osnutka poročila o trgovini za spremembe: trgovinska in naložbena strategija EU za južno Sredozemlje po arabski pomladi ( 2011/2113(INI) ),
– having regard to the draft report on trade for change: the EU trade and investment strategy for the Southern Mediterranean following the Arab Spring revolutions ( 2011/2113(INI) ),
A. ker mala in srednja podjetja v evro-sredozemskem območju ustvarijo delovna mesta za 25 % delovne sile v regiji;
A. whereas SMEs in the Euro-Mediterranean area employ 25% of the regional labour force;
B. ker 70 % neformalnih zaposlitev v evro-sredozemskem območju zagotavljajo mala in srednja podjetja, ki svoje dejavnosti ne opravljajo v kmetijskem sektorju, temveč delujejo na črnem trgu, saj jih uradni upravni organi različnih držav ne registrirajo;
B. whereas 70% of informal employment in the Euro-Mediterranean area is accounted for by non-agricultural SMEs operating on the ‘black market’, given that they have not been registered by official national authorities;
C. ker mala in srednja podjetja, ki delujejo na črnem trgu, niso pozorna na možnosti, ki jih ponujajo trgovinski partnerji iz držav evro-sredozemskega območja, zato bolj malo prispevajo h gospodarski rasti tega območja;
C. whereas ‘black market’ SMEs are not receptive to opportunities offered by trading partners in Euro-Mediterranean countries and can therefore do little to boost the region’s economic growth;
D. ker je glede na skorajšnjo vzpostavitev prostotrgovinskega območja z državami evro-sredozemskega območja bistveno in ustrezno zagotoviti večji pretok blaga in ljudi ter spodbuditi vzajemno poznavanje izdelkov, s katerimi bi lahko regiji trgovali ter tako prispevali k razvoju;
D. whereas if the EU and the Euro-Mediterranean countries are to be encompassed within a single free trade area, goods and persons will need to move more freely and it will be essential to foster shared knowledge of products that could be traded between the two regions and hence generate development;
o sporazumu med EU in Marokom o vzajemnih ukrepih liberalizacije v zvezi s kmetijskimi in ribiškimi proizvodi ( 2012/2522(RSP) )
on the agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products ( 2012/2522(RSP) )
PE479.473v01-00 B7‑0047/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in Marokom o vzajemnih ukrepih liberalizacije v zvezi s kmetijskimi in ribiškimi proizvodi ( 2012/2522(RSP) )
PE479.473v01-00 B7‑0047/2012 European Parliament resolution on the agreement between the EU and Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products and fishery products ( 2012/2522(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o vzajemnih ukrepih liberalizacije v zvezi s kmetijskimi proizvodi, predelanimi kmetijskimi proizvodi ter ribami in ribiškimi proizvodi, nadomestitvi protokolov 1, 2 in 3 ter njihovih prilog in spremembah Evro-mediteranskega sporazuma o pridružitvi med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani (15974/2010),
– having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco concerning reciprocal liberalisation measures on agricultural products, processed agricultural products, fish and fishery products, the replacement of Protocols 1, 2 and 3 and their Annexes and amendments to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part (15974/2010),
A. ker je Evropska unija po začetku barcelonskega procesa leta 1995 s približno dvanajstimi državami južnega Sredozemlja podpisala sporazume o pridružitvi, da bi okrepila dialog in sodelovanje ter tako vzpostavila območje miru, varnosti in blaginje;
A. whereas the Barcelona process, launched in 1995, led to Association Agreements between the European Union and around a dozen Southern Mediterranean countries, with the aim to enhance dialogue and cooperation and thereby establish an area of peace, security and stability;
B. ker je načrt iz Rabata, oblikovan leta 2005, premaknil žarišče sodelovanja, saj je prednost namenil vzpostavljanju proste trgovine namesto uravnoteženemu razvoju vseh stebrov, tako da se je trgovinski steber zaradi nadaljnje liberalizacije izluščil iz tega sporazuma;
B. whereas the Rabat roadmap, established in 2005, changed the focus of the cooperation, privileging the creation of free trade over balanced development of all pillars, which led to a singling out of the trade pillar of the AA's for further liberalisation processes,
C. ker bi moralo biti osrednje vprašanje trgovinske politike EU v zvezi z državami na južni strani sredozemskega bazena zagotavljanje ukrepov za mir, varnost in stabilnost prek regionalnega povezovanja, proizvodnje blaga z dodano vrednostjo in lokalne potrošnje;
C. whereas the key concern for EU trade policy towards countries on the Southern side of the Mediterranean basin should be the provision of measures to improve peace, security and stability via regional integration, production upstream the added value ladder, and local consumption;
D. ker je arabska pomlad pokazala, da je treba na vseh področjih politike med EU in državami južnega Sredozemlja najprej obravnavati demokratični deficit;
D. whereas the Arab Spring has shown that democratic shortcomings have to be addressed first in any policy area between the EU and the Southern Mediterranean countries;