natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme strožja merila za opredelitev davčnih oaz in naj si prizadeva za mednarodno zavezujoč večstranski sporazum o samodejni izmenjavi davčnih podatkov, vključno za sklade in fundacije, v katerem bi bili za primere nespoštovanja navedeni protiukrepi; poziva Komisijo, naj države v razvoju podpre pri njihovem boju proti nezakonitim odlivom in begu kapitala, saj so glavna ovira za uporabo domačih prihodkov za razvojne namene; opozarja Komisijo zlasti na resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. aprila 2009 o predlogu direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2003/48/ES o obdavčevanju dohodka od prihrankov v obliki plačil obresti Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0325 .
Calls on the Commission to adopt more stringent criteria for the identification of tax havens and to work towards an internationally binding multilateral automatic tax-information exchange agreement, including for trusts and foundations, envisaging countermeasures in the event of non-compliance; calls on the Commission to support developing countries in their fight against illicit outflows and capital flight, as these are identified as a major obstacle to mobilisation of domestic revenue for development; draws the Commission's attention in particular to the European Parliament resolution of 24 April 2009 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2003/48/EC on taxation of savings income in the form of interest payments Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0325 .
in na ukrepe, priporočene za boj proti davčnim oazam;
and to the recommended measures for combating tax havens;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker davčni sporazumi niso ugodno vplivali na porazdelitev prihodkov od davkov; ugotavlja, da metoda, po kateri se pravica do obdavčitve določi po načelu države sedeža in ne države izvora, prispeva k favoriziranju davčnih oaz; meni, da je treba preučiti pravičnost davčnih sporazumov, ki omogočajo zagotavljanje primarne pravice do obdavčenja v državi izvora, kjer se dejansko izvaja dejavnost;
Expresses its concern about the unfortunate effect of tax treaties on the distribution of tax revenues; notes that the method of assigning the right to tax based on the domicile principle rather than the source country helps to make tax havens a more favourable location; deems that tax treaties should be reviewed for fairness, which implies the possibility of granting the primary right to tax in the source country where real activities are pursued;
obžaluje, da skupina G20 še ni predstavila jasnega časovnega načrta in konkretnih sankcijskih mehanizmov za učinkovit boj proti davčnim oazam; poziva k sprejetju mednarodne konvencije, ki bo vključevala sankcije za nekooperativne jurisdikcije in finančne institucije, ki sodelujejo z davčnimi oazami, da bi se odpravile škodljive davčne strukture; poziva EU, naj sprejme podobne ukrepe, kot je zakon ZDA za odpravo zlorabe davčnih oaz, in naj preuči možnost odvzema dovoljenja za opravljanje bančnih storitev finančnim ustanovam, ki uporabljajo davčne oaze;
Deplores the fact that the G20 has not yet proposed a clear timetable and concrete sanction mechanism to make effective the fight against tax havens; calls for the adoption of an international convention with the purpose of eliminating harmful tax structures that would include sanctions both for non-cooperative jurisdictions and for financial institutions that operate with tax havens; urges the EU to adopt measures similar to the US Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act and to consider the possibility of withdrawing banking licences from financial institutions that operate with tax havens;
meni, da bi morala EU na evropski in mednarodni ravni zagotoviti tudi skladnost pri izvajanju standardov na področju bonitetnega nadzora, davkov ter pranja denarja;
Considers that the EU should also ensure consistency in the implementation at EU and international level of standards in the areas of prudential supervision, taxation and money laundering;
poziva k mednarodnemu razkritju struktur oderuških skladov, da se jih odkrije in prepove njihovo delovanje;
Calls for international disclosure of the structures of vulture funds to identify them and ban their activities;
poziva, naj se v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu uvede mehanizem za neodvisen nadzor, ki bo ocenjeval neto davčni učinek odprave carin sočasno z doseženim napredkom na področju davčnih reform v vsaki državi posebej; poziva k uvedbi določbe, ki predvideva obvezen splošni pregled vsakega sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu v obdobju od tri do pet let in omogoča spremembo določb vsakega sporazuma v prid izkoreninjenju revščine, trajnostnemu razvoju in regionalnemu povezovanju; poziva k obveznemu pregledu napredka posameznih držav pri izvajanju davčnih reform ali učinkovitem pobiranju davkov v skladu z najnovejšimi različicami vzorčne konvencije Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj o davku na dohodek in kapital;
Calls for the creation, in the EPA framework, of an independent monitoring mechanism to assess the net tax impact of abolishing customs duties and, at the same time, the progress being made in the area of tax reform country by country; calls for a clause to be introduced providing for a mandatory overall review of all EPAs within three to five years and for the provisions of each agreement to be amended to make them more conducive to poverty eradication, sustainable development and regional integration; calls, further, for a mandatory review of individual countries' progress in implementing tax reforms or efficient tax collection in line with the latest versions of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital;
poudarja, da morajo v državah v razvoju zlasti pri davčni in proračunski politiki sodelovati tudi davčne uprave (če niso del ministrstva za finance) na način, ki ne spodbuja rivalstva in zavisti, pač pa neguje naravo dobrih odnosov in dobrega upravljanja v davčnih zadevah;
Stresses that tax administrations in developing countries need to cooperate if they are not part of the respective Ministries of Finance, especially over tax and budgetary policy, in ways that do not stimulate rivalry and jealousy but foster good relationships and good governance in tax matters;
poziva k vzpostavitvi ali institucionalni izboljšavi (če so že vzpostavljeni) tako imenovanih (delno) neodvisnih davčnih organov prek ustreznega sistema nadzora in ravnovesij, s čimer bi preprečili zlorabo davčnih organov;
Calls for the establishment or (if they are already in place) institutional improvement of so called (semi-)autonomous revenue authorities (ARA), through adequate systems of checks and balances, to prevent abuse of tax authorities;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je visok status in neodvisnost pri upravljanju neodvisnih davčnih organov treba uravnati s pluralistično ureditvijo upravljanja, s katero se zagotovi, da;
Underlines in this context that the high status and managerial autonomy of ARAs should be offset by pluralistic governance arrangements which make sure:
ima neodvisni davčni organ zagotovljen proračun, ki ga vlade ne morejo spremeniti;
that an ARA has a guaranteed budget that cannot be changed by the government;
so njihov status, odgovornosti in pooblastila uzakonjeni in da jih lahko varujejo policija in sodišča;
that its status, responsibilities and powers are enshrined in law and can be protected by the police and the courts;
za imenovanje v nadzorni svet (ki bo vzpostavljen) skrbijo različni javni akterji (različna ministrstva, poslovna in odvetniška združenja);
that appointments to the supervisory board (to be established) are made by a variety of public agents (different ministries, business and lawyers' associations);
je imenovanje v nadzorni svet dolgoročno in za določen čas;
that appointments to the supervisory board are for a long term and of fixed duration;
je upravno in operativno osebje odgovorno zgolj nadzornemu svetu;
and that managerial and operational staff are answerable only to the supervisory board;
meni, da mora razvoj učinkovitega sistema obdavčenja v državah v razvoju postati bistveni del njihovih javnih financ; meni, da bi morala nova politika vlaganj EU v države v razvoju prispevati k vzpostavitvi okolja, ki bo bolj naklonjeno tujim in domačim zasebnim naložbam, ter pogojev za učinkovitejšo mednarodno pomoč; opozarja, da se mora politika vlaganj EU osredotočiti na razvoj malih in srednjih podjetij, tudi z zagotavljanjem mikrokreditov, ter spodbujati inovacije, učinkovitost javnih služb, javno-zasebna partnerstva in prenos znanja, da bi pospešili rast;
Considers that the development of an efficient tax system in developing countries must become the backbone of their public finances; considers that the new EU investment policy in developing countries should contribute to establishing an environment more favourable to foreign and domestic private investment and to creating the conditions for more effective international assistance; recalls that the EU's investment policy must focus on SME development, including through the provision of micro-credit, and encourage innovation, public service efficiency, public-private partnerships and knowledge transfer in order to promote growth;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. marca 2011 o kmetijstvu EU in mednarodni trgovini ( 2010/2110(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on EU agriculture and international trade ( 2010/2110(INI) )
ob upoštevanju naslova III tretjega dela ter naslovov II in V petega dela Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
having regard to Part Three, Title III and Part Five, Titles II and V of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju načela o zahtevah po dobrem počutju živali iz člena 13 v naslovu II prvega dela Lizbonske pogodbe,
having regard to the principles relating to the welfare requirements of animals laid down in Article 13 of the TFEU,
ob upoštevanju sporazumov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), zlasti sporazuma o kmetijstvu, ki je bil dosežen v urugvajskem krogu in začel veljati 1. januarja 1995,
having regard to the WTO agreements, and in particular to the Agreement on Agriculture which was negotiated during the Uruguay Round and entered into force on 1 January 1995,
ob upoštevanju deklaracije, sprejete na četrti ministrski konferenci STO, ki je potekala od 9. do 14. novembra 2001 v Dohi, sklepa generalnega sveta STO z dne 1. avgusta 2004 in deklaracije, sprejete na šesti ministrski konferenci STO, ki je potekala od 13. do 18. decembra 2005 v Hongkongu,
having regard to the Declaration adopted at the fourth Ministerial Conference held in Doha from 9 to 14 November 2001, to the Decision adopted by the WTO General Council on 1 August 2004 and to the Declaration adopted at the sixth Ministerial Conference held in Hong Kong from 13 to18 December 2005,
ob upoštevanju revidiranega osnutka modalitet za kmetijstvo, ki ga je 6. decembra 2008 razposlal vodja pogajanj o kmetijstvu pri STO,
having regard to the revised draft modalities for agriculture circulated on 6 December 2008 by the WTO chairperson of the agriculture negotiations,
ob upoštevanju memoranduma o soglasju med Združenimi državami Amerike in Evropsko komisijo z dne 15. maja 2009 glede uvoza govejega mesa živali, ki niso dobivale nekaterih hormonov za pospeševanje rasti, in glede povečanih dajatev za nekatere proizvode Evropskih skupnosti v Združenih državah,
having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding of 15 May 2009 between the United States of America and the European Commission regarding the importation of beef from animals not treated with certain growth-promoting hormones and increased duties applied by the United States to certain products of the European Communities,
ob upoštevanju sporazumne rešitve spora med Kanado in Evropsko unijo z naslovom „Evropske skupnosti – ukrepi, ki vplivajo na odobritev in trženje biotehnoloških proizvodov“, ki je bila sprejeta 15. julija 2009,
having regard to the mutually agreed solution reached on 15 July 2009 between Canada and the European Union to the dispute entitled ‘European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products’,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma, ki so ga 15. decembra 2009 parafirale EU in države Latinske Amerike in ki določa pogoje za zaključek nerešenih sporov o ureditvi uvoza banan v EU (ženevski sporazum),
having regard to the agreement initialled on 15 December 2009 between the EU and Latin American countries setting the conditions for the final settlement of pending disputes on the EU import regime for bananas (Geneva Agreement),
ob upoštevanju sklepov pogajanj med EU in Marokom z dne 17. decembra 2009 o sporazumu glede ukrepov za liberalizacijo proizvodov iz kmetijstva in ribištva,
having regard to the conclusion, on 17 December 2009, of the negotiations between the EU and Morocco on an agreement concerning liberalisation measures on agricultural and fisheries products,
ob upoštevanju sklepov pogajanj med EU, Perujem in Kolumbijo z dne 1. marca 2010 o podpisu večstranskega sporazuma,
having regard to the conclusion, on 1 March 2010, of the negotiations between the EU, Peru and Colombia on the signing of a Multi-Party Agreement,
ob upoštevanju sporazumne rešitve spora med Republiko Argentino in Evropsko unijo z naslovom „Evropske skupnosti – ukrepi, ki vplivajo na odobritev in trženje biotehnoloških proizvodov“, ki je bila sprejeta 18. marca 2010,
having regard to the mutually agreed solution reached on 18 March 2010 between the Argentine Republic and the European Union to the dispute entitled ‘European Communities - Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products’,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25.marca 2010 o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: katera strategija je prava?
having regard to its resolution of 25 March 2010 on ‘Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow?’
ob upoštevanju sklepov pogajanj med EU in Srednjo Ameriko z dne 19. maja 2010 o trgovinskem stebru pridružitvenega sporazuma,
having regard to the conclusion, on 19 May 2010, of the negotiations between the EU and Central America on the trade pillar of the Association Agreement,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Južno Korejo, ki je bil podpisan 6. oktobra 2010,
having regard to the Free Trade Agreement between the EU and South Korea signed on 6 October 2010,
ob upoštevanju tekočih pogajanj med EU in Mercosurjem za sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma,
having regard to the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Mercosur towards an Association Agreement,
ob upoštevanju tekočih pogajanj med EU in Kanado za sklenitev celovitega gospodarskega in trgovinskega sporazuma,
having regard to the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Canada towards a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement,
ob upoštevanju tekočih pogajanj med EU in Indijo za sklenitev sporazuma o prosti trgovini,
having regard to the ongoing negotiations between the EU and India towards a Free Trade Agreement,
ob upoštevanju tekočih pogajanj med EU in Ukrajino za sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma,
having regard to the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Ukraine towards an Association Agreement,
ob upoštevanju svoje študije z naslovom „Pregled pogajanj STO o kmetijstvu po neuspehu pogovorov iz leta 2008“ (Stocktake of the WTO Agricultural Negotiations after the Failure of the 2008 Talks), objavljene junija 2009,
having regard to its study entitled ‘Stocktake of the WTO Agricultural Negotiations after the Failure of the 2008 Talks’, of June 2009,
Načrt za zaščito imetnikov geografskih označb v drugih članicah STO“ (Geographical Indications and TRIPs: 10 Years Later.
having regard to the guide entitled ‘Geographical Indications and TRIPs: 10 Years Later.
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 15. septembra 2010 za uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvedenih finančnih instrumentih OTC, centralnih nasprotnih strankah in repozitorijih sklenjenih poslov ( KOM(2010)0484 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal of 15 September 2010 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (COM (2010)0484),
ob upoštevanju vprašanja liberalizacije carin za Pakistan iz člena 1 predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi nujnih avtonomnih trgovinskih preferencialov za Pakistan ( KOM(2010)0552 ),
having regard to the issue of the liberalisation of duties for Pakistan, as provided for in Article 1 of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council introducing emergency autonomous trade preferences for Pakistan ( COM(2010)0552 ),
ob upoštevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja Organizacije združenih narodov,
having regard to the UN Millennium Development Goals,
ob upoštevanju člena 208 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 208 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za razvoj ( A7–0030/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Development ( A7-0030/2011 ),
ker je EU še vedno največja uvoznica kmetijskih proizvodov na svetu, saj se je vrednost uvoza v preteklem desetletju skoraj podvojila in sedaj znaša skoraj 20 % vsega svetovnega uvoza,
whereas the EU remains by far the largest importer of agricultural goods in the world, with imports having almost doubled in value over the past decade and now accounting for nearly 20% of world imports,
ker se delež EU v svetovnem kmetijskem izvozu znižuje zaradi hitrejše rasti drugih ključnih kmetijskih trgovinskih partneric; ker je v letih 2007–2009 izvoz končnih izdelkov znašal 68 % skupne vrednosti izvoza EU, medtem ko je bil ta delež pri polizdelkih 23 % in pri osnovnih proizvodih 9 %, ker so cene na svetovnem trgu eden od dejavnikov, ki Uniji povzročajo težave pri izvozu proizvodov, saj so na splošno cene nizke, proizvodni stroški v Uniji pa višji,
whereas the EU's share of global agricultural exports is declining as a result of the faster growth of other key agricultural trading partners; whereas final products accounted for 68% of the value of EU exports in 2007-2009, while intermediate products and commodities represented 23% and 9% respectively; whereas, furthermore, world market prices are a factor in the difficulties the EU is experiencing in exporting its products, given that, in general, prices are low and the Union has higher production costs,
ker je trgovinski primanjkljaj EU v kmetijstvu leta 2008 dosegel rekordnih 7 milijard EUR; ker se je trgovinski primanjkljaj EU z Mercosurjem, na primer, od leta 2000 več kot podvojil, tako da vrednost uvoza kmetijskih proizvodov iz Mercosurja v EU zdaj znaša 19 milijard EUR, vrednost izvoza iz EU v Mercosur pa zgolj 1 milijardo EUR,
whereas the EU agricultural trade deficit reached a record high of €7 billion in 2008; whereas the EU's trade deficit with Mercosur, for example, has more than doubled since 2000 and EU imports of agricultural products from Mercosur are now worth €19 billion worth, as against €1 billion worth of exports,
ker je EU največja uvoznica kmetijskih proizvodov iz držav v razvoju, uvaža namreč več kot ZDA, Japonska, Kanada, Avstralija in Nova Zelandija skupaj; ker približno 71 % celotnega kmetijskega uvoza EU izhaja iz držav v razvoju, in sicer po zaslugi pobude „vse razen orožja“ za najmanj razvite države, splošnega sistema preferencialov in sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu,
whereas the EU is the world's largest importer of agricultural goods from developing countries, importing more than the US, Japan, Canada, Australia and New Zealand combined; whereas around 71% of the EU's total agricultural imports originate from developing countries, as a result of the Everything but Arms (EBA) initiative for least developed countries (LDCs), the generalised system of preferences (GSP), and the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs),
ker bi osnutek modalitet za kmetijstvo Svetovne trgovinske organizacije za leto 2008 od EU zahteval dodatno popuščanje v primerjavi z že tako velikodušno ponudbo EU iz oktobra 2005,
whereas the 2008 WTO draft modalities on agriculture would require even greater concessions from the EU than those set out in the already substantial offer made by the EU in October 2005,
ker bo zagotavljanje skladnosti politike za razvoj (SPR) pri kmetijstvu in trgovini vplivalo tudi na uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja št. 1 (izkoreninjenje skrajne revščine in lakote) in 8 (globalno partnerstvo za razvoj), vključno z določbami za bolj pravična trgovinska pravila in dostop do trga;
whereas the application of policy coherence for development (PCD) to agriculture and trade will also impact on the fulfilment of Millennium Development Goals 1 (eradication of extreme poverty and hunger) and 8 (global partnership for development), including through provisions for fairer trade rules and market access,
ker je EU že močno zmanjšala domačo podporo kmetijstvu, ki je izkrivljala trg, medtem ko ključne trgovinske partnerice tega niso storile, zlasti ZDA, ki so z zakonom o kmetijstvu iz leta 2008 ohranile in v nekaterih primerih celo okrepile svoje instrumente,
whereas the EU has already drastically reduced its trade-distorting domestic support, unlike key trading partners, in particular the US, which maintained and in some cases strengthened its instruments under the 2008 Farm Bill,
ker je EU enostransko močno znižala svoja izvozna nadomestila, saj je njihov delež v proračunu SKP padel z 29,5 % leta 1993 na samo 1,2 % leta 2009, delež izvoznih nadomestil v vrednosti kmetijskega izvoza pa je padel s 25 % leta 1992 na zgolj 0,9 % v letu 2009; ker nekatere ključne trgovinske partnerice še naprej izdatno uporabljajo druge oblike izvoznih spodbud,
whereas the EU has unilaterally made a substantial reduction in its export refunds, with their share of the CAP budget falling from 29.5 % in 1993 to only 1.2 % in 2009, and with the proportion of the value of agricultural exports for which export refunds are paid falling from 25% in 1992 to only 0.9% in 2009; whereas some key trading partners are continuing to make considerable use of other forms of export incentives,
ker ZDA v okviru spora o hormonih v govedini ohranjajo sankcije proti EU in so celo napovedale njihovo kolobarjenje, tako da bodo zajele druge kmetijske proizvode EU, da bi povečale njihov učinek (t. i. vrtljiva zakonodaja); ker je EU z memorandumom o soglasju odobrila uvozno kvoto s stopnjo dajatve nič za 20 000 ton govedine,
whereas, in the framework of the ‘beef hormones’ dispute, the US is continuing to impose sanctions on the EU and had even announced that they will be rotated to cover other EU agricultural products, in order to increase their impact (‘carousel’ legislation); whereas under the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) the EU grants a zero-duty import tariff quota of 20 000 tons of beef,
ker ZDA pri STO spodbijajo pravila EU o higieni in trženju perutnine,
whereas the US has challenged, within the WTO, the EU rules governing the hygiene and marketing of poultry,
ker je EU s Kanado in Argentino dosegla sporazumno rešitev spora o gensko spremenjenih organizmih; ker so ZDA podale zahtevo o splošnih povračilnih ukrepih,
whereas a mutually agreed solution was reached with Canada and Argentina on the ‘GMOs dispute’; whereas the US has made a general retaliation request,
ker je bila odločba odbora STO za sladkor med glavnimi dejavniki, ki so spodbudili reformo sektorja sladkorja EU v letu 2006, in ker ta odločba še vedno močno vpliva na trgovino s sladkorjem; ker skupna ureditev trga za sladkor spoštuje vse trgovinske obveznosti EU; ker se je EU, prej druga največja izvoznica sladkorja, v treh letih preobrazila v drugo največjo neto uvoznico, s tem pa so največ pridobile države v razvoju (najmanj razvite države in države AKP),
whereas the ruling of the WTO panel on sugar was one of the main drivers of the 2006 EU sugar reform and is still having a major impact on trade in sugar; whereas the common market organisation for sugar respects all EU trade commitments; whereas in the space of three years the EU has changed from being the second largest exporter of sugar to the second largest net importer, mainly for the benefit of developing countries (LDCs and ACP countries),