natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Med aretiranimi so poleg Maryam Bahreman, na katero se nanaša spoštovana komisarka, tudi fotografinja Maryam Madji, režiserka Mahnaz Mohammadi, novinarka Zahra Yazadi in Mansoureh Behkish.
These include Maryam Bahreman, to whom the Honourable Member refers, as well as photographer Maryam Madji, filmmaker Mahnaz Mohammadi, journalist Zahra Yazadi and Mansoureh Behkish.
V svoji izjavi, ki je na voljo v farsiju, da bi tako dosegla širšo množico, je visoka predstavnica in podpredsednica pozvala Iran k spoštovanju pravice do svobode izražanja v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi Irana na področju človekovih pravic.
In her statement, which was made available in Farsi so as to reach a wide public, the High Representative/Vice-President called on Iran to respect the right to freedom of expression in accordance with its international human rights obligations.
Visoka predstavnica in podpredsednica je nadalje iranske oblasti pozvala, naj nemudoma izpustijo te in druge pridržane borke za pravice žensk v Iranu.
The High Representative/Vice-President furthermore called on Iran to immediately release these women, and other detained women's right defenders in Iran.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006486/2011
Question for written answer E-006486/2011
Sonia Alfano (ALDE) , Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (ALDE) , Oriol Junqueras Vies (Verts/ALE) , Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE) , Rui Tavares (Verts/ALE) , Gesine Meissner (ALDE) , Arlene McCarthy (S&D) , Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu (S&D) , Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR) , Anneli Jäätteenmäki (ALDE) , Britta Thomsen (S&D) , Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Kinga Göncz (S&D) in Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE)
Sonia Alfano (ALDE) , Izaskun Bilbao Barandica (ALDE) , Oriol Junqueras Vies (Verts/ALE) , Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE) , Rui Tavares (GUE/NGL) , Gesine Meissner (ALDE) , Arlene McCarthy (S&D) , Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu (S&D) , Janusz Wojciechowski (ECR) , Anneli Jäätteenmäki (ALDE) , Britta Thomsen (S&D) , Cornelia Ernst (GUE/NGL) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Kinga Göncz (S&D) and Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE)
(1. julij 2011)
(1 July 2011)
Zadeva: Primer Simoneja Righija
Subject: The Simone Righi case
Novinarka španskega časopisa El Pais Rosa Montero je zgodbo Simoneja Righija opisala kot „noro“.
‘Crazy’ is how the journalist of the Spanish newspaper El Pais , Rosa Montero, described the story of Simone Righi.
Ta mladi Italijan iz Bologne je konec leta 2007 s svojim dekletom in tremi psi potoval v Španijo.
This young Italian, a resident of Bologna, travelled to Spain in late 2007 with his girlfriend and three dogs.
Pse je za štiri dni oddal v zavetišče v Cádizu.
He placed the dogs for a period of four days in the ‘El Refugio’ shelter in Cadiz.
Po štirih dneh se je vrnil po pse.
Four days later he went back to retrieve his dogs.
Soočiti sta se morala s krutim prizorom: eden od psov je bil mrtev, druga dva sta bila pogrešana.
They had to face a horrifying scenario: one of his dogs was dead and the other two were missing.
Dne 7. oktobra 2007 se je Simone Righi udeležil demonstracij proti zavetišču za živali (ki so ga zaradi več pritožb zaradi slabega ravnanja zaprli).
On 7 October 2007, Simone Righi took part in a demonstration against the animal shelter (which was closed after several complaints of bad treatment).
Med tem dogodkom naj bi bila Teófila Martínez, županja Cádiza, žrtev napada Simoneja Righija.
During this event Teófila Martínez, the Mayor of Cadiz, was allegedly assaulted by Simone Righi.
Po tem dogodku je bil Simone Righi dva meseca v priporu.
Following this episode, Simone Righi was remanded in custody for two months.
Dne 8. februarja 2011 je sodišče v Cádizu Simoneja Righija obsodilo na štiriinpolletno zaporno kazen zaradi njegovega domnevnega fizičnega napada na županjo Cádiza in zaradi oviranja javnega uslužbenca pri izvajanju njegovih dolžnosti.
On 8 February 2011, Simone Righi was sentenced by the Court in Cadiz to four and a half years in jail for his alleged physical attack on the Mayor of Cadiz and for resisting a public official in the exercise of his duty.
Pri odmeri zaporne kazni ni bilo – brez vsakršne utemeljitve – upoštevano pričanje novinarke časopisa „La Voz de Cádiz“ Silvie Tubio, ki je bila med napadom na županjo v bližini Simoneja.
The sentence did not take into consideration, without apparent justification, the testimony of the journalist of the newspaper La Voz de Cádiz , Silvia Tubio, who was close to Simone during the aggression on the mayor.
V skladu z izjavo priče je Simone Righi nedolžen.
According to the witness, Simone Righi is innocent.
Prav tako sodišče ni upoštevalo videoposnetka, ki jasno kaže, da je bil Righi aretiran, ne da bi se upiral.
Moreover, the Court gave no importance to a movie that clearly shows that Righi was arrested without resistance.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno: 1.
In light of the above: 1.
Ali je Komisija seznanjena s primerom Simoneja Righija? 2.
Is the Commission aware of the Simone Righi case? 2.
Ali Komisija lahko potrdi, ali so bili členi 47, 48 in 49 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah kršeni? 3.
Can the Commission say whether Articles 47, 48 and 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union have been violated? 3.
Katere ukrepe namerava sprejeti Komisija, da bi bila vsakemu evropskemu državljanu zagotovljena pravica do odvetnika, pravica do komunikacije med priporom, pravica do pravne pomoči in pravica do poštenega sojenja?
What measures does the Commission intend to adopt to ensure that every European citizen has the right to access to a lawyer, the right to communicate while in detention, the right to legal aid and the right to a really fair trial?
(28. julij 2011)
(28 July 2011)
Komisija je seznanjena s primerom Simoneja Righija.
The Commission is aware of Simone Righi's case.
Kar zadeva vprašanja temeljnih pravic (členi 47, 48 in 49 Listine o temeljnih pravicah), Komisija opozarja, da se v skladu s členom 51(1) Listine njene določbe nanašajo na države članice samo, ko izvajajo pravo Unije.
With regard to fundamental rights issues (Articles 47, 48 and 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights), the Commission notes that, according to Article 51(1) of the Charter, the provisions of the Charter are addressed to the Member States only when they are implementing Union law.
Iz informacij, ki so jih predložili spoštovani poslanci, ni videti, da bi v tem primeru zadevna država članica ukrepala v okviru izvajanja prava EU.
On the basis of the information provided by the Honourable Members, it does not appear that in the matter referred to, the Member State concerned acted in the course of the implementation of EC law.
Zato morajo države članice same zagotoviti spoštovanje svojih obveznosti v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, ki izvirajo iz mednarodnih sporazumov in nacionalne zakonodaje.
Therefore, it is for the Member States alone to ensure that their obligations regarding fundamental rights — as resulting from international agreements and from internal legislation — are respected.
Španija mora, tako kot vse druge države članice, spoštovati Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP).
Spain, like any other Member State, is bound to respect the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR).
Krepitev procesnih pravic osebe, ki je osumljena ali obtožena storitve kaznivega dejanja, je ena od najpomembnejših prednostnih nalog Komisije.
The strengthening of the procedural rights of a person suspected or accused of having committed a crime is a top priority for the Commission.
Komisija je julija 2010 predstavila predlog v zvezi s pravico do obveščenosti o pravicah in obtožbah.
The Commission put forward a proposal on the right to information about rights and about charges in July 2010.
Predlog vsebuje obveznost držav članic, da vsem osebam, ki jim je odvzeta prostost, izročijo obvestilo o pravicah, s katerim jih seznanijo z njihovimi pravicami.
It includes the obligation for Member States to provide all persons deprived of their liberty with a Letter of Rights, informing them of their rights.
O predlogu potekajo pogajanja.
The proposal is in negotiation.
Komisija je 8. junija 2011 sprejela predlog direktive o dostopu do odvetnika in pravici priprtih oseb do komunikacije z osebo po njihovi izbiri ter s konzularnimi organi.
On 8 June 2011, the Commission adopted a proposal for a directive on access to a lawyer and on the right for detained persons to communicate with a person of their choice and with consular authorities.
Komisija namerava s tem svežnjem ukrepov določiti skupne najnižje standarde poštenega sojenja na podlagi Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah in sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
With this package of measures, the Commission intends to establish common minimum fair trial standards, drawing on the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Druga dva predloga, tj. o pravicah ranljivih oseb do obrambe in o pravni pomoči, bosta sledila leta 2012 oziroma 2013.
Other proposal, e.g. on the defence rights of vulnerable persons and on legal aid will follow in 2012 and 2013.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006598/2011
Question for written answer E-006598/2011
(4. julij 2011)
(4 July 2011)
Zadeva: Sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in zastopanost znanstvenikov
Subject: Seventh Framework Programme for Research and the representation of scientists
Sedmi okvirni program za raziskave je začel veljati po dveh širitvah EU, ko se je integraciji priključilo 12 novih držav članic.
The Seventh Framework Programme for Research came into effect following the two EU enlargements which brought in 12 new countries.
Širitev ni pomenila le geografskih sprememb, temveč je povečala tudi raznolikost v Uniji.
Those enlargements not only brought about geographic changes, they also increased the diversity within the EU.
Prav tako so raziskovalci iz manjših držav članic zelo redko prisotni kot koordinatorji projektov.
Similarly, very few of the project coordinators are researchers from the smaller Member States.
Komisija v pojasnilo kot vzrok za tako stanje navaja, da je v okvirnem programu glavni kriterij izbire raziskovalna odličnost.
The Commission has explained that the reason for this situation is that the main selection criterion for the framework programme is research excellence.
Potemtakem je mogoče sklepati, da je v regijah, ki so v projektih zelo malo prisotne, edini razlog slaba kakovost raziskovalnega dela.
It can therefore be concluded that the only reason for certain regions having a very low involvement in projects is the poor quality of research work.
Komisijo zato sprašujem: 1.
In view of the above, I would like to ask the Commission: 1.
Na osnovi česa Evropska komisija sklepa, da je glavni kriterij za izbor znanstvenikov raziskovalna odličnost? 2.
On what basis does it conclude that the main criterion for the selection of scientists is research excellence? 2.
Ali namerava Evropska komisija narediti študijo vzrokov zelo različne geografske porazdeljenosti projektov in koordinatorstva? 3.
Does it intend to look into the causes of the very uneven geographical distribution of projects and project coordination? 3.
S kakšnimi ukrepi lahko po mnenju Komisije na evropskem nivoju spodbudimo geografsko enakovrednejšo udeležbo raziskovalcev v okvirnem programu?
What measures does it believe we could apply at European level to promote a more even geographical distribution of researchers in the framework programme?
Odgovor komisarke Geoghegan-Quinn v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Ms Geoghegan-Quinn on behalf of the Commission
(11. avgust 2011)
(11 August 2011)
Stremljenje k odličnosti je v izhodišču vsakega raziskovalnega postopka in predstavlja prvotno podlago za odločitev, katere raziskave financirati.
The search for excellence is at the heart of the research process itself and is the primary basis for the decision on which research to fund.
Pri raziskovanju vlada velika konkurenca in tisti, ki v teh postopkih končajo na drugem mestu, so redko nagrajeni.
Research is a fiercely competitive process where there are few rewards for those who come second.
Zato je najboljši način za zagotavljanje čim boljših možnosti uspeha pri raziskovanju in s tem učinkovitosti sistema financiranja ravno spodbujanje odličnega raziskovanja.
Accordingly, the best way of maximising both the chances of success in research and hence the effectiveness and efficiency of the funding system is through supporting excellent research.
Uspešnost tega pristopa potrjuje vmesna ocena 7OP, v kateri je navedeno: „…je načelo odličnosti pri izbiri projektov večinoma doseženo.
The success of this approach is confirmed by the Interim Evaluation of FP7, which concludes: ‘….the principle of excellence in project selection is largely achieved.
V velikem delu programa Sodelovanje , za katerega sta namenjeni skoraj dve tretjini sredstev 7OP, se financirajo vodilni raziskovalci, kakovost predlogov je na splošno ocenjena kot visoka, za financiranje pa obstaja velika konkurenca.
In much of the Cooperation Programme to which nearly two-thirds of FP7 funding is allocated, leading researchers are being funded, the quality of proposals is generally assessed to be high and there is robust competition for funding.
Evropski raziskovalni svet je kljub temu, da gre za nov in nepreizkušen instrument, očitno uspel privabiti in financirati raziskovanje na najvišji ravni, pomembno vlogo pa ima tudi pri zadrževanju talentiranih raziskovalcev.“ Vmesna ocena Sedmega okvirnega programa – Poročilo skupine strokovnjakov, http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/fp7_interim_evaluation_expert_group_report.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none, stran 8.
Despite being a new, and thus untried, instrument, the European Research Council (ERC) has manifestly succeeded in attracting and funding world-class research and is playing an important role in anchoring research talent’ Interim evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme — Report of the Expert Group, http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/other_reports_studies_and_documents/fp7_interim_evaluation_expert_group_report.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none, page 8. .
Komisija že podrobno in celovito spremlja izvajanje OP, vključno s sodelovanjem zadevnih zainteresiranih strani.
The Commission already undertakes detailed and comprehensive monitoring of FP implementation, including participation by the relevant stakeholders.
Te informacije so na voljo, na primer, v letnih poročilih o spremljanju http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=fp7-monitoring in podatkovnem skladišču CODRA, do katerega imajo države članice dostop.
This information is available through, for example, the annual monitoring reports (http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=fp7-monitoring) and the CORDA data warehouse to which the Member States have access.
Poleg tega je Komisija začela s preučevanjem ozadij različnih vzorcev udeležbe v OP ter možnih vzrokov in posledic.
In addition, the Commission is currently undertaking work to examine what lies behind the variety of participation patterns in the FP, possible causes and implications.
Komisija mora to vprašanje proučiti na podlagi sklepa Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 9. marca ter do konca leta 2011 poročati o ugotovitvah.
The Commission was requested to examine this issue in the 9 March conclusions of the Competitiveness Council and to report back by the end of 2011.
Komisija bo do konca leta 2011 nadaljevala z delom, v posvetovanja in analize pa namerava vključiti tudi države članice.
The Commission will continue further work during the remainder of 2011, with plans to engage Member States in the discussions and analysis.
V skladu z navedenim in cilji, metodologijo ter načini izvajanja iz strategije Evropa 2020 bo Komisija ocenila potencial raziskovanja in razvoja in napredek v primerjavi z dogovorjenimi cilji za vsako državo posebej, torej ne na podlagi vnaprej določenih skupin držav članic, kot na primer EU-12 in EU-15, kar bi lahko vodilo do posplošenih napačnih predstav.
In this respect and in line with the goals, methodology and implementation modalities set by the Europe 2020 strategy, the Commission will assess the R & D potential and progress against commonly agreed targets for each country separately and not on the basis of predefined groupings of Member States such as EU‑12 and EU‑15 which, in any case, may risk leading to generalised misconceptions.
Uspešnost pri udeležbi države članice ima lahko veliko vzrokov, v večini primerov pa jih je treba obravnavati v povezavi s specifičnimi družbeno-ekonomskimi zmožnostmi države in njenim potencialom na področju raziskav in razvoja.
There can be many reasons for a country's participation performance and, in most cases, they should be considered in relation to the country's specific socioeconomic capacities and R & D potential.
Kot primer se je pokazalo, da je uspešnost države v 7OP (v smislu prejetega financiranja) med drugim močno povezani z nacionalno izbiro prednostnih nalog politike in proračunskih prioritet.
It has been shown, for example, that a country's performance in FP7 (in terms of funding received) is strongly related, among other factors, to its own national choices on policy and budgetary priorities.
V primeru številnih držav članic EU-12 drugi dejavniki vključujejo nižje življenjske stroške in dejstvo, da se še vedno nahajajo v prehodni fazi, v kateri se infrastruktura in viri za raziskovanje postopno prilagajajo na integracijo v EU.
In the case of many of the EU‑12 Member States, other factors may include the lower cost of living and the fact that they are still undergoing a transition phase during which research infrastructures and resources are gradually adapting towards EU integration.
Končno, Komisija meni, da je glede na to, da se bo 7OP izvajal do konca leta 2013, na tej stopnji iz teh podatkov prezgodaj, da bi lahko dokončno sklepali o geografski porazdeljenosti projektov po posameznih državah, saj pomemben del proračunskih sredstev še ni bil porabljen.
Finally, the Commission is of the opinion that it is, at this stage, premature to draw any definitive conclusions from these mentioned figures in terms of geographical distribution of projects per participating country, considering that FP7 will continue to be operational until the end of 2013 with a significant budget still to be committed.
Strukturni skladi že podpirajo številne ukrepe na nacionalni in regionalni ravni za povečanje znanstvenih in tehnoloških zmogljivosti držav članic in regij.
Many actions at national and regional level, in favour of the increase of scientific and technological capacity of the Member States and regions, are already supported with the Structural Funds.
Kohezijska politika zagotavlja pomembno finančno podporo raziskavam in inovacijam, zlasti izgradnji zmogljivosti, Komisija pa se močno zavzema za vzpostavitev večje sinergije med Okvirnim programom za raziskave in razvoj in kohezijsko politiko (kot je poudarjeno v sporočilu o vodilni pobudi „Unija inovacij“ Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij, Vodilna pobuda iz strategije Evropa 2020 Unija inovacij, 6.10.2010 (COM(2010) 546 konč., SEC(2010) 1161). in sporočilu „Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020“ Sporočilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij, Prispevek regionalne politike k pametni rasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020, 6.10.2010, (COM(2010) 553 konč., SEC(2010) 1183). ).
Cohesion policy provides significant financial support for research and innovation, notably for capacity building, and the Commission is vigorously pursuing the establishment of stronger synergies between the Research and Development Framework Programme and cohesion policy (as is outlined in the communications on the ‘Innovation Union’ flagship Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union, Brussels, 6.10.2010, COM(2010)546 final, SEC(2010)1161. and ‘Regional policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020’ Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Regional policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020, Brussels, 6.10.2010, COM(2010)553 final, SEC(2010)1183. ).
V naslednjem programskem obdobju bo doseženo boljše osredotočanje nacionalnega in regionalnega financiranja raziskav, zlasti z uporabo strategij pametne specializacije (S3), za katere je Komisija ravno uvedla podporno platformo http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/research-and-innovation/s3platform.cfm. .
For the next programming period, a better focus of national and regional research funding will be achieved, in particular through the deployment of Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) for which the Commission just launched a support platform http://ipts.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/research-and-innovation/s3platform.cfm .
Splošni cilj je zagotoviti, da se strukturni skladi uporabljajo v celotnem obsegu za podporo izgradnji zmogljivosti v regijah, in sicer z namenskimi dejavnostmi, osredotočenimi na ustanavljanje centrov odličnosti, posodabljanje univerz, nakup znanstvene opreme, razvoj in prenos lokalne tehnologije, podporo ustanavljanju in odcepljanju podjetij in lokalno povezanost industrije in akademskih krogov.
The overall aim is to ensure that the Structural Funds are deployed to their full extent to support capacity building in the regions through dedicated activities aimed at founding centres of excellence, modernising universities, purchase of scientific equipment, local technology development and transfer, support to start-ups and spin-offs, and local interaction between industry and academia.
Komisija meni, da se bo s tem lahko razvila „pot do odličnosti“, ki bo tem regijam omogočila polno udeležbo v pobudi Obzorja 2020, ki temelji na odličnosti.
The Commission believes that this will allow a ‘staircase of excellence’ to be developed, leading these regions to fully participate in Horizon 2020, based on excellence.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006599/2011
Question for written answer E-006599/2011
Zadeva: Nemške jedrske elektrarne in posledice njihovega zaprtja
Subject: German nuclear power stations and the consequences of shutting them down
Odločitev nemške vlade, da do leta 2022 postopoma zapre svoje jedrske elektrarne, je popolnoma legalna odločitev suverene države.
The German Government’s decision to gradually shut down its nuclear power stations by 2022 is a perfectly legitimate decision for a sovereign state to take.
Vendar bo ta odločitev imela posledice za energetski trg drugih evropskih držav, pa tudi za okolje.
However, that decision will have repercussions for the energy market of other European countries, as well as for the environment.
Zaprtje jedrskih elektrarn bo verjetno povzročilo, da bodo gospodinjstva in podjetja v prihodnjih letih plačevala več za svojo porabo elektrike.
The closure of these nuclear power stations will probably mean households and businesses paying more for their electricity in the coming years.
Glede na čezmejne tokove preskrbe z elektriko se bo to zvišanje cene občutilo tudi izven Nemčije.
And given that energy supplies flow across borders, that price rise will also be felt outside Germany.
Nemška zvezna agencija za omrežja (Bundesnetzagentur) je že opozorila, da bo simultano zapiranje številnih jedrskih elektrarn v Nemčiji predstavljalo tveganje za porušenje ravnovesja električnega omrežja.
The German federal network agency (Bundesnetzagentur) has already warned that the simultaneous closure of many nuclear power stations in Germany risks upsetting the balance in the electricity network.
Posledice bodo občutne tako v Nemčiji kot v drugih evropskih državah.
The consequences will be considerable, both in Germany and in other European countries.