natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
države članice poziva tudi, naj tiskane informacije nadomestijo z informacijami, ki so objavljene elektronsko in na svetovnem spletu z uporabo inteligentnih portalov, kjer je to mogoče;
Also calls on the Member States to replace the production of printed information with information produced electronically and on the Internet, using smart Internet portals where possible;
naroči predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. septembra 2007 o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja ( 2007/2096(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 4 September 2007 on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment ( 2007/2096(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, podpisanega 16. decembra 2003 UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement on better lawmaking, signed on 16 December 2003 OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2000 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu: "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1998: skupna odgovornost (1998)" in "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1999" UL C 197, 12.7.2001, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 1998 - A shared responsibility (1998)" and "Better lawmaking 1999" OJ C 197, 12.7.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o Beli knjigi Komisije o evropskem javnem upravljanju UL C 153, 27.6.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the Commission White Paper on European governance OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2000" in "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2001" 4 UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 8 April 2003 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 2000" and "Better lawmaking 2001" OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. februarja 2004 o poročilu Komisije z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2002" 5 UL C 98 E, 23.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 February 2004 on the Commission report entitled "Better Lawmaking 2002" OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju zakonodajne dejavnosti Skupnosti 6 UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2004 on the Commission communication on simplifying and improving the Community's regulatory activity OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o oceni učinka zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopkov posvetovanja 7 UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on assessment of the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedures OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja 8 UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: Uporaba načela subsidiarnosti – 12. letno poročilo 9 UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on "Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report" OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 14. novembra 2006 z naslovom: "Prvo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2006)0690 ),
having regard to the Commission working document of 14 November 2006 entitled "First progress report on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2006)0690 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0271/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0271/2007 ),
ker si Komisija, Svet in Evropski parlament sistematično prizadevajo za izvajanje, opredelitev in izboljšanje uporabe instrumentov za poenostavitev zakonodaje,
having regard to the current unstinting and systematic commitment by the Commission, the Council and Parliament to bring about, define and improve the application of legislative simplification tools,
ker je poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja z namenom zagotavljanja jasnosti, učinkovitosti in kakovosti zakonodaje predpogoj za doseganje cilja "izboljšanja priprave zakonodaje", ki je ena od prednostnih nalog Evropske unije in katere cilj je zagotoviti visoko raven rasti in zaposlovanja,
whereas simplifying the legislative environment to ensure the clarity, efficacy and quality of legislation is an essential prerequisite for attaining the objective of "better lawmaking", which, in turn, is a priority for the Union with a view to securing high levels of growth and employment,
ker je eden od ključnih dosežkov poenostavitve njena postopna razširitev na vsa področja zakonodaje Evropske skupnosti,
whereas one of the main results of simplification is its progressive coverage of all EC regulatory areas,
ob upoštevanju obveznosti in ciljev, predvidenih v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, predvsem obveznosti in ciljev v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in zmanjšanjem obsega zakonodaje Skupnosti ter vplivom te zakonodaje v državah članicah,
having regard to the obligations and aims laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, especially those intended to simplify and reduce the volume of Community legislation and those relating to the impact of that legislation in the Member States,
ker je omenjeni delovni dokument Komisije nadaljevanje in uresničitev sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2005 z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2005)0535 ),
whereas the above-mentioned Commission working document is a follow-up to, and implements, the Commission communication of 25 October 2005 entitled "Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2005)0535 ),
ker omenjeni delovni dokument vsebuje nov tekoč "program poenostavitve" za obdobje 2006-2009 z napovedjo ukrepov za poenostavitev oblike, ki zajemajo 43 prenovitev, 12 kodifikacij in 8 razveljavitev ter drugih 46 ukrepov za poenostavitev vsebine, ki se običajno opredeljujejo kot "revizije",
whereas the above-mentioned working document sets out a new "simplification rolling programme" covering the period 2006-2009, in which measures are announced to simplify form, based on 43 recasts, 12 codifications and 8 repeals, in addition to 46 other measures to simplify substance, generally defined as cases of "revision",
ker je bilo prejšnjim ukrepom poenostavitve dodanih še približno 500 novih zakonodajnih pobud (od katerih 200 v letu 2007) iz ločenega tekočega programa, ki je posebej posvečen kodifikacijam,
whereas in addition to the above simplification measures, some 500 new legislative initiatives (some 200 of which in 2007 alone) have been included in a separate rolling programme specifically dedicated to codifications,
ker je Komisija pojasnila, da ostaja program kodifikacije okviren, saj je odvisen od dostopnosti aktov, ki jih je treba kodificirati, v vseh jezikih, in ker je po besedah Komisije treba kodifikacijo prestaviti, kadar so predvidene nove spremembe teh aktov, iz česar sledi, da se po mnenju Komisije vrstni red za predložitev kodifikacij, navedenih v tekočem programu, lahko spremeni glede na ta dva dejavnika,
whereas the Commission points out that the codification programme remains indicative, since it depends on the availability in all languages of the acts to be codified and whereas, according to the Commission, codification should be postponed when new amendments of those acts are envisaged, with the result that, in the Commission's view, the order of acts in the rolling programme might change in the light of these two factors,
ker Komisija v omenjenem delovnem dokumentu predlaga okrepitev prakse uvajanja uvodnega obrazložitvenega memoranduma v predloge, ki jih oblikuje, da bi lahko bolje obrazložila cilje poenostavitve,
whereas, in the above-mentioned working document, the Commission proposes increasing the practice of including in its proposals an initial explanatory memorandum in order better to explain the simplification objectives pursued,
ker so homogeni sklop metodologij, izboljšan na podlagi posvetovanj z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi in izvedbe sektorskih analiz, sodelovanje med Komisijo, Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, pa tudi obširnejša uporaba samoregulacije in koregulacije dejavniki uspešnosti pri pobudah za poenostavitev,
whereas the success factors for achieving the simplification goals include a solid set of methodologies, which has improved thanks to consultation with all interested parties and to the development of sector-specific analyses, close cooperation between the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council and an increasing use of self-regulation and co-regulation,
ker mora poenostavitev na evropski ravni spremljati ustrezna poenostavitev na nacionalni ravni, s čimer se zagotovi, da nacionalni predpisi ali tehnične ovire ne ogrozijo prednosti poenostavitve na ravni Skupnosti,
whereas the simplification being promoted at European level should be accompanied by appropriate simplification at national level to ensure that the advantages of Community simplification are not undermined by national rules or technical barriers,
poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, uporabi in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to place greater emphasis on implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the "better regulation" process;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so pobude za poenostavitev prvič vključene v zakonodajni in delovni program Komisije za leto 2007, kar jasno kaže, da je strategija za poenostavitev politična prednostna naloga;
Welcomes the fact that, for the first time, the simplification initiatives have been included in the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2007, in confirmation of the political priority to be given to the simplification strategy;
poziva Komisijo, naj odslej sistematično vključuje pobude za poenostavitev v posebni del zakonodajnega in delovnega programa; v tem delu naj tudi navede, kakšno prednost namerava dati posameznim pobudam poenostavitve, ter naj v ta namen določi predloge za poenostavitev že v letni politični strategiji na začetku letnega procesa načrtovanja zakonodaje; poziva Komisijo, naj tudi prepreči nastajanje prevelikega števila dokumentov z navedenimi seznami pobud za poenostavitev, da bi bil referenčni okvir čim jasnejši;
Calls on the Commission systematically to include from now on the simplification initiatives in a specific part of the legislative and work programme, to indicate therein what priority it intends to give to each individual simplification initiative and, to that end, to set out its simplification proposals already in its annual policy strategy at the start of the annual legislative programming process; calls on the Commission, lastly, to avoid the proliferation of documents containing lists of simplification initiatives, in order to have as clear a reference framework as possible;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej začne reševati težave, povezane s prevajanjem, in naj prepreči, da bi predstavitev novih zakonodajnih predlogov negativno vplivala na pobude za kodifikacijo, kar bi škodilo celotnemu procesu poenostavitve; vztraja, naj bo Komisija dosledna in naj v zakonodajnem in delovnem programu ne navaja načrtov za kodifikacijo vsebin, glede katerih namerava predstaviti zakonodajne predloge;
Calls on the Commission to address, as soon as possible, the difficulties relating to translation and to prevent the submission of new legislative proposals from having a negative impact on the codification initiatives, thereby undermining the entire simplification process; stresses that the Commission should be consistent and thus refrain from setting out in its legislative and work programme plans for codification on the same topics as those in relation to which it intends to submit substantive legislative proposals;
predlaga, naj Komisija enkrat za vselej sprejme prenovitev kot običajno zakonodajno tehniko, kar bo omogočilo, da bo za vsako pobudo na voljo celotno besedilo, tudi kadar bodo prisotne specifične spremembe, z jasno navedbo novih in nespremenjenih delov, s čimer bo zagotovljena čitljivost in večja preglednost zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Proposes that the Commission once and for all adopt recasting as a standard legislative technique so that, for each initiative, the text can be available in its entirety, also where there are specific amendments, providing a clear indication of the new parts and those which are unchanged, thereby increasing the legibility and transparency of Community legislation;
poziva Komisijo, naj v primerih, ko prenovitev ni mogoča, upošteva kodifikacijo zadevnega zakonodajnega okolja kot običajno zakonodajno tehniko, izvedljivo v roku šestih mesecev; meni, da bi bilo mogoče v okviru zgoraj navedenega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma v sodelovanju s Svetom in Komisijo vzpostaviti posebne ad hoc strukture in predvideti ustrezno vključitev zainteresiranih strani, prav z namenom spodbujanja poenostavitve;
Calls on the Commission, furthermore, to bear in mind that where recasting is impossible, the codification of the legislative area concerned should be the standard legislative technique to be carried out within a six-month time-frame; takes the view that, in accordance with the above-mentioned interinstitutional agreement, Parliament, together with the Council and the Commission and providing for the necessary involvement of those parties concerned, could set up special ad hoc structures with the precise aim of promoting simplification;
odobrava obveznost, ki jo je prevzela Komisija, da bo izdelala homogene metodološke temelje za postopek poenostavitve; zato poziva Komisijo, naj vztraja pri posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi, na primer z razširitvijo pobud, napovedanih oktobra 2005 na področju kmetijstva in ribištva, na druge sektorje in z okrepitvijo ukrepov, ki jih namerava sprejeti v zvezi s tem na področju prava družb in avtorskih pravic; spodbuja Komisijo, naj pospeši sektorske analize in meritve upravne obremenitve, ki jo povzroča veljavna zakonodaja Skupnosti;
Welcomes the commitment taken on by the Commission to develop a solid set of methodologies for the work of simplification; to that end, calls on the Commission to persist in consulting the interested parties, for instance by extending to other sectors the initiatives already announced in October 2005 concerning agriculture and fisheries and by strengthening the measures it intends to adopt in this regard in the field of company law and copyright; encourages the Commission to further develop sector-specific analyses and the measurement of the administrative burdens generated by existing Community legislation;
poudarja temeljni pomen sodelovanja med institucijami Skupnosti kot nujen pogoj za uspeh vsake strategije poenostavitve; v zvezi s tem opozarja na pomembno znamenje dobre volje, ki ga je dal Evropski parlament s spremembami svojega Poslovnika, katerih namen je olajšati postopek sprejemanja kodifikacij oziroma uvesti ad hoc zakonodajni postopek za prenovitve;
Stresses the vital importance of cooperation between the Community institutions as a prerequisite for the success of any simplification strategy; highlights in this respect the strong signal of goodwill emitted by the European Parliament thanks to the amendments to its Rules of Procedure designed, respectively, to facilitate the adoption procedure for codifications and to introduce an ad hoc legislative procedure for recasts;
poudarja, da morajo biti tradicionalni zakonodajni instrumenti še naprej običajni način za doseganje političnih ciljev, ki jih določajo Pogodbe; meni, da koregulacija in samoregulacija lahko koristno dopolnjujeta ali nadomeščata zakonodajne ukrepe, če omogočata izboljšave, ki so enakovredne ali večje od tistih, ki jih je možno uresničiti z zakonodajo; poudarja, da mora biti vsaka uporaba postopkov alternativne zakonske ureditve skladna z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljši pripravi zakonodaje; opozarja Komisijo, da je dolžna opredeliti pogoje in omejitve, ki jih morajo strani spoštovati pri izvajanju teh praks, ter da se sme te prakse uporabljati le pod nadzorom Komisije in brez poseganja v pravico Evropskega parlamenta do nasprotovanja njihovi uporabi;
Reiterates that the traditional legislative instruments should continue to be used as a general rule in order to attain the objectives laid down in the Treaty; considers that co-regulation and self-regulation could usefully supplement or replace legislative measures where those methods make improvements of equivalent or broader scope than legislation can provide; stresses that any use of alternative regulatory arrangements should be in compliance with the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making; points out that the Commission has to lay down the conditions and limits which the parties must observe when employing such methods, and that these should in any event be used under Commission supervision and without prejudice to Parliament's right to object to their use;
poziva Komisijo, naj si čimbolj prizadeva, da procesa poenostavitve in izboljšanja kakovosti zakonodaje v splošnem, ki poteka na ravni Skupnosti, na nacionalni ravni ne ogrozijo notranji predpisi ali tehnične ovire; od Komisije zahteva, da ta proces usmerja in spremlja tudi na nacionalni ravni, na primer tako, da tudi s pomočjo opozoril subjektov, ki jih to neposredno zadeva, opravlja funkcijo centra za zbiranje in širjenje najboljših praks, razvitih v Evropski uniji in v državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to make every effort to ensure that the process being promoted at European level to simplify regulation and generally to improve its quality is not undermined at national level by internal rules or technical barriers; calls on the Commission to guide and monitor this process also at national level, for instance by acting as a centre for collecting and disseminating the best practices developed within the European Union and its Member States and, not least, responding to indications from stakeholders;
poudarja, da imajo redne in temeljite ocene učinka bistveno vlogo v postopku poenostavitve in da bi jih morala Svet in Parlament upoštevati pri vlaganju predlogov sprememb k predlogu v okviru zakonodajnega postopka.
Stresses that regular and thorough impact assessments play a key role in the simplification process and that such assessments should be considered by the Council and Parliament when amendments are made to a proposal during the legislative process;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. septembra 2007 o pravnih in institucionalnih vidikih uporabe instrumentov "mehkega prava" ( 2007/2028(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 4 September 2007 on institutional and legal implications of the use of "soft law" instruments ( 2007/2028(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in zlasti členov 211, 230 in 249 Pogodbe,
having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Articles 211, 230 and 249 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ustavne zadeve, Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0259/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6-0259/2007 ),
ker je pojem mehko pravo po običajni praksi dvoumen in škodljiv in ker se ga ne bi smelo uporabljati v dokumentih institucij Skupnosti,
whereas the notion of soft law, based on common practice, is ambiguous and pernicious and should not be used in any documents of the Community institutions,
ker se razlike med
whereas the distinction between
ne bi smelo sprejeti ali je priznati, saj je konceptualno zmotna,
, being conceptually aberrant, should not be accepted or recognised,
ker tako imenovani instrumenti mehkega prava, kot so priporočila, zelene in bele knjige ali sklepi Sveta, nimajo nobene pravne vrednosti in niso zavezujoči,
whereas so-called soft law instruments, such as recommendations, green and white papers or Council conclusions, do not have any legal value or binding force,
ker "mehko pravo" ne nudi popolnega sodnega varstva,
whereas "soft law" does not provide full judicial protection,
ker bi obsežna uporaba instrumentov "mehkega prava" pomenila premik z edinstvenega modela Skupnosti na bolj tradicionalne modele mednarodnih organizacij,
whereas extensive recourse to "soft law" instruments would signify a shift from the unique Community model to that of a traditional international organisation,
ker trenutno poteka razprava o tem, kako bi se lahko izboljšalo učinkovitost regulativne funkcije Evropske unije, tako kar zadeva "mehko pravo" kot tudi, kar zadeva "trdo pravo",
whereas there is currently a dispute as to how to make the regulatory function of the European Union more efficient with regard to both "soft law" and "hard law",
ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi
whereas in
Van Gend in Loos
Van Gend en Loos
ugotovilo, da je Pogodba "več kot mednarodni sporazum, ki vzpostavlja zgolj obojestranske obveznosti držav pogodbenic. ...
the Court of Justice of the European Communities held that the Treaty "is more than an agreement which merely creates mutual obligations between the Contracting States. ...
Take pravice nastanejo ne samo z izrecno podelitvijo s Pogodbo, ampak tudi na podlagi obveznosti, ki jih Pogodba jasno opredeli in naloži posameznikom, državam članicam in institucijam Skupnosti" Zadeva 26/62,
These rights arise not only where they are expressly granted by the Treaty, but also by reason of obligations which the Treaty imposes in a clearly defined way upon individuals as well as upon the Member States and upon the institutions of the Community" Case 26/62
Van Gend in Loos
Van Gend & Loos
[1963] ECR 1.
[1963] ECR 1.
ker se posledično pravo Skupnosti razlikuje od mednarodnega javnega prava po tem, da je zavezujoče ne le za države, ampak tudi za posameznike, ki na podlagi prava Skupnosti izvršujejo pravno zavarovane pravice, ter po tem, da vključuje vrsto institucij, vključno z Evropskim parlamentom, ki ga državljani Unije volijo neposredno; ker evropski pravni red temelji na demokraciji in pravni državi, kot je jasno izraženo v členu 6 in preambuli Pogodbe EU,
whereas, consequently, Community law may be distinguished from public international law by reason of the fact that it is binding, not only on States but on individuals, who derive legally enforceable rights from it, and involves a set of institutions, including the European Parliament, which is directly elected by Union citizens; whereas, moreover, the European legal order is based on democracy and the rule of law, as Article 6 of and the preamble to the EU Treaty make clear,
ker to pomeni, da lahko institucije EU delujejo le v skladu z načelom zakonitosti, in sicer kadar jim je dodeljena pristojnost na pravni podlagi, in v okviru omejitev svojih pooblastil, in ker za upoštevanje tega skrbi Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti,
whereas this means that the EU institutions may only act in accordance with the principle of legality, that is to say, where a legal basis confers competence and within the limits of their powers, and whereas there is a European Court to ensure that they do so,