natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom „Boljšemu delovanju enotnega trga za storitve naproti – uporaba rezultatov postopka medsebojnega ocenjevanja direktive o storitvah“ na podlagi izsledkov medsebojnega ocenjevanja predstavi nadaljnje korake, da bi čim bolje izkoristili enotni trg za storitve.
The Commission's Communication "Towards a better functioning Single Market for services - building on the results of the mutual evaluation process of the Services Directive" uses the finding of the mutual evaluation to present further steps to fully benefit from the Single Market for services.
Poročevalka podpira ciljno naravnane ukrepe, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, vendar meni, da bi se morali usmeriti v take korake, ki bodo prinesli čim večjo dodano vrednost za delovanje enotnega trga.
Your rapporteur supports targeted actions proposed by the Commission, believes however, that they should be focused on the measures that will bring maximum added value to the functioning of the single market.
Nedvomno je osrednjega pomena celovit in pravilen prenos direktive o storitvah v nacionalno zakonodajo.
Without any doubt, the full and correct transposition of the Services Directive remains the urgent priority.
Dvostranska srečanja Komisije in držav članic o izvajanju direktive že potekajo.
The bilateral meetings between the Commission and the Members States on the implementation of the Directive are already taking place.
Poročevalka meni, da bi moral biti Parlament obveščen o napredku tega dialoga in da bi morala Komisija, kadar je to potrebno, uporabiti tudi izvršilne ukrepe.
Your rapporteur believes that the Parliament should be kept informed about the progress of this dialogue and when necessary the Commission should not hesitate to take enforcement measures.
Komisija bo izvedla tudi prvo ekonomsko oceno dejanskega izvajanja direktive.
The first economic assessment of the actual implementation of the Directive will also be carried out by the Commission.
Ker je Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 28. januarja 2011 o izvajanju direktive o storitvah 2006/123/ES že pozval k celoviti oceni direktive o storitvah, poročevalka meni, da bi morali biti njeni izsledki Parlamentu na voljo, takoj ko bodo dostopni.
As the Parliament has already called for the comprehensive assessment of the Services Directive in its Resolution of 28 January 2011 on implementation of the Services Directive 2006/123/EC , your rapporteur thinks that its findings should be made available to the Parliament as soon as they are available.
Komisija predlaga tudi „preverjanje uspešnosti“, s čimer bi ocenili uporabo različnih zakonodajnih aktov EU in njihovo delovanje v praksi.
The Commission is also proposing to carry out "performance checks" to assess how different pieces of EU legislation are working in practice and how they interact.
Rezervirane dejavnosti, zahteve glede pravne oblike, lastništva kapitala in zavarovanja bodo prav tako predmet poglobljene analize, saj je bilo ugotovljeno, da so še vedno ovira za podjetja in državljane.
Reserved activities , legal form and capital ownership requirements and insurance requirements will be also subject to the in-depth analysis as they have been identified as still posing barriers for businesses and citizens.
Svoboda opravljanja storitev iz člena 16 direktive o storitvah je ena njenih glavnih določb.
The freedom to provide services in Article 16 of the Services Directive is one of the main provisions of the Services Directive.
Izsledki medsebojnega ocenjevanja kažejo, da zahteve za čezmejne storitve še vedno pomenijo veliko težavo.
The results of the mutual evaluation show that the requirements applied to cross - border services are still considered a serious problem.
Države članice in Komisija bi si morale še naprej prizadevati za njeno ustrezno izvajanje.
Member States and the Commission should work further to ensure its proper application.
V skladu z določbami njenega člena 16(4) bi moralo biti poročilo o uresničevanju pravice do opravljanja storitev na voljo do konca leta 2011.
According to the provisions of Article 16 (4) of the Directive the report of the application of the freedom to provide services clause should be made available by the end 2011.
Parlament ga že pričakuje, da se bo lahko bolje seznanil s težavami pri čezmejnem opravljanju storitev.
The Parliament awaits this report to better understand the problems encountered in the cross - border provision of services.
MEDSEBOJNO OCENJEVANJE KOT ORODJE
MUTUAL EVALUATION AS A TOOL
Splošna ocena medsebojnega ocenjevanja kot orodja politike je pozitivna.
The overall assessment of the mutual evaluation as a policy tool is positive.
Poročevalka meni, da so izkušnje in izsledki medsebojnega ocenjevanja koristni in dragoceni, zato predlaga, da se njegova uporaba razširi še na druga področja politike.
The rapporteur believes that the experiences and the results of the mutual evaluation are useful and valuable and therefore proposes to extend its use to other policy areas.
Vendar pa bi morala biti odločitev o uporabi medsebojnega ocenjevanja za druge direktive EU premišljena, odvisna od vsakega posameznega primera in bi morala temeljiti na teh pogojih:
However the decision on the application of the mutual evaluation to other EU Directives should be balanced and should be made on the case - by case basis and should be subject to the following conditions:
· postopek bi moral biti omejen na okvirno direktivo, ki državam članicam dopušča določen manevrski prostor;
· the process should be limited to the framework Directive which gives a certain degree of discretion to the Members States;
· medsebojno ocenjevanje bi moralo obsegati samo ključne določbe in se izogniti temu, da bi bile vanj vključene številne določbe, kar bi povzročilo nepotrebno birokratsko breme za uprave držav članic.
· the mutual evaluation should only cover key provisions, avoiding the situation when numerous provisions are subject to the procedure and cause unnecessary bureaucratic burdens to the Member States' administrations.
Poročevalka prav tako meni, da bi bilo treba izboljšati preglednost postopka.
Your rapporteur also believes that the transparency of the process should be improved.
Za razprave med upravami držav članic je sicer potrebna določena stopnja zaupnosti, vendar bi morala biti deležnikom na voljo redna poročila.
Some degree of confidentially seems to be necessary to foster discussions between Member States' administrations but regular reports should be available to the stakeholders.
Poročevalec: Frank Engel
Rapporteur: Frank Engel
2. ker so bile v zadnjih letih storitve vir vseh neto ustvarjenih delovnih mest v EU, meni, da še ni bil izkoriščen celoten potencial enotnega trga ter da je direktiva o storitvah pomembno orodje za nadaljnjo sprostitev tega potenciala za trajnostno in vključujočo rast ter nova delovna mesta;
Given that in recent years services have been the source of all net job creation in the EU, considers that the full potential of the Single Market has not yet been realised and that the Services Directive is an important tool in further unlocking this potential for sustainable and socially inclusive growth and jobs;
5. ugotavlja, da so bile nekatere storitve zaradi njihovih posebnih lastnosti izključene iz področja direktive o storitvah in da je morda treba sprejeti sektorsko zakonodajo EU, pri tem pa zagotoviti spoštovanje načel sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti;
Notes that certain services have been excluded from the scope of the Services Directive because of their specific nature and that there may be a need to adopt sectoral EU legislation, whilst ensuring that the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity are observed;
7. opominja, da akt za enotni trg vključuje zavezo, da bo do leta 2011 predstavljen niz ukrepov, ki bi moral izboljšati delovanje enotnega trga za storitve; pozdravlja predlagane ukrepe v aktu za enotni trg o delovnih pogojih delavcev, zaposlenih v storitvenem sektorju v EU, zlasti napotenih delavcev; poudarja, da mora evropski enotni trg temeljiti na trdnih gospodarskih in socialnih pravilih, da bi vzpostavili enake konkurenčne pogoje;
Recalls that the Single Market Act includes a pledge to bring forward, in 2011, a set of measures which should improve the functioning of the Single Market for services; welcomes the measures proposed under the Single Market Act which address the labour conditions of workers delivering services in the EU, especially as regards posted workers; stresses the need to base the European Single Market on sound economic and social rules, so as to create a level playing field;
9. poudarja, da neupravičene ali nesorazmerne zahteve najbolj vplivajo na male in srednje ponudnike storitev, ki so bistvena gonilna sila zaposlovanja in socialnega vključevanja; ugotavlja, da so pri zagotavljanju, da lahko ponudniki storitev, zlasti mala in srednja podjetja, v celoti uveljavljajo svoje pravice na enotnem trgu, pomembni alternativni mehanizmi za reševanje sporov, kot je SOLVIT; pozdravlja izjavo Komisije, da bo ocenila učinkovitost teh orodij in poročala o potrebi po nadaljnjih specifičnih pobudah.
Emphasises that small and medium-sized service providers, who are key drivers for employment and social inclusion, are those worst affected by unjustified or disproportionate requirements; notes the important role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms such as SOLVIT in ensuring that service providers, and in particular SMEs, can fully exploit their Single Market rights; welcomes the Commission’s announcement that it will assess the effectiveness of these tools and report on the need for further specific initiatives.
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Marian Harkin, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Pascal Canfin, Frank Engel, Marielle Gallo, Anna Hedh, María Irigoyen Pérez, Othmar Karas, Constance Le Grip, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Olle Schmidt, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Anja Weisgerber
Pascal Canfin, Frank Engel, Marielle Gallo, Anna Hedh, María Irigoyen Pérez, Othmar Karas, Constance Le Grip, Antonyia Parvanova, Sylvana Rapti, Olle Schmidt, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Anja Weisgerber
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o finančnih pravilih, ki se uporabljajo za letni proračun Unije
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financial rules applicable to the annual budget of the Union
(Skupne seje odborov – člen 51 Poslovnika)
(Joint committee meetings – Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure)
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve .......................................................................178
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...............................................189
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ...........................190
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy .............202
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ................................................................207
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ................................219
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0815 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0815 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 294(2) in 322 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter člena 106a Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7–0016/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 322 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as well as Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0016/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenj 3/2010
– having regard to the opinions 3/2010
UL C 145 z dne 3.06.2010, str.
OJ C 145, 3.06.2010, p.
1. in 6/2010
1. and 6/2010
UL C 334 z dne 10.12.10, str.
OJ C 334, 10.12.2010, p.
1. , Evropskega računskega sodišča kot sta bili revidirani in posodobljeni 25. januarja 2011,
1. of the European Court of Auditors , as revised and updated on 25 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju skupnih razprav Odbora za proračun in Odbora za proračunski nadzor v skladu s členom 51 poslovnika,
– having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control under Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0325/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0325/2011 ),
(1) Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti, je bila večkrat bistveno spremenjena.
(1) Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities has been substantially amended several times.
Ker so potrebne nadaljnje spremembe, med drugim zaradi upoštevanja sprememb, uvedenih z Lizbonsko pogodbo, bi bilo zaradi jasnosti treba Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 nadomestiti s to uredbo.
Since further amendments are to be made, including changes to take account of amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 should be replaced by this Regulation, in the interests of clarity.
Ker so potrebne nadaljnje spremembe, med drugim zaradi upoštevanja sprememb, uvedenih z Lizbonsko pogodbo, bi bilo zaradi jasnosti treba Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 nadomestiti s to uredbo v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ki sta jo skupaj sprejela Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
Since further amendments are to be made, including changes to take account of amendments introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon, the Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 should be replaced by this Regulation, according to the Treaty of Lisbon adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council according to the ordinary legislative procedure, in the interest of clarity.
Ta uvodna izjava bi morala odražati okrepljeno vlogo EP.
Enforced role of the EP should be reflected in this recital.
(2) Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 je določila proračunska načela in finančna pravila, ki jih morajo vse institucije upoštevati v vseh zakonodajnih aktih.
(2) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 laid down the budgetary principles and financial rules to be respected in all legislative acts and by all institutions.
Treba bi bilo ohraniti temeljna načela, zasnovo in zgradbo navedene uredbe ter osnovna pravila upravljanja proračuna in finančnega poslovodenja.
The fundamental principles, the concept and the structure of that Regulation and the basic rules of budgetary and financial management need to be maintained.
Odstopanja od navedenih temeljnih načel bi bilo treba pregledati in čim bolj poenostaviti, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, ali so še relevantna, kakšna je njihova dodana vrednost za letni proračun Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proračun) in kakšno breme nalagajo zainteresiranim stranem.
Derogations to those fundamental principles should be reviewed and simplified as far as possible, taking into account their continuing relevance, their added-value for the annual budget of the Union (hereinafter the ‘budget’), and the burden they impose on stakeholders.
Treba je ohraniti in okrepiti ključne elemente finančne reforme – vlogo finančnih udeležencev, združevanje kontrol v operativnih službah, notranje revizorje, oblikovanje proračuna po dejavnostih, posodobitev računovodskih načel in pravil ter osnovna načela za donacije.
It is necessary to maintain and strengthen the key elements of the financial reform: the role of the financial actors, the integration of controls in operational services, the internal auditors, the Activity Based Budgeting, the modernisation of accounting principles and rules and the basic principles for grants.
(2) Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 je določila proračunska načela in finančna pravila za določitev in izvrševanje splošnega proračuna, ki zagotavljajo dobro in učinkovito upravljanje, nadzor in zaščito finančnih interesov Unije ter večjo preglednost , ki jih morajo vse institucije upoštevati v vseh zakonodajnih aktih.
(2) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 laid down the budgetary principles and financial rules governing the establishment and implementation of the general budget, ensuring sound and effective management, control and protection of the financial interests of the Union, as well as increasing transparency, to be respected in all legislative acts and by all institutions.
Odstopanja od navedenih temeljnih načel bi bilo treba pregledati in čim bolj poenostaviti, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, ali so še relevantna, kakšna je njihova dodana vrednost za letni proračun Unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: proračun) in kakšno breme nalagajo zainteresiranim stranem. proračun) in kakšno breme nalagajo zainteresiranim stranem.
Derogations to those fundamental principles should be reviewed and simplified as far as possible, taking into account their continuing relevance, their added-value for the annual budget of the Union (hereinafter the ‘budget’), and the burden they impose on stakeholders.
(4a) Kar zadeva okvirne programe Unije za raziskave, bi bilo treba poskrbeti za nadaljnjo poenostavitev in uskladitev pravil in postopkov, kot je zapisano v resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. novembra 2010 o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov 1 in v končnem poročilu strokovne skupine za vmesno oceno sedmega okvirnega programa, objavljenem 12. novembra 2010 na podlagi člena 7(2) Sklepa št. 1982/2006/ES;
(4a) As regards the Union’s research framework programmes, further simplification and harmonisation of rules and procedures should be introduced, as stated in the European Parliament resolution of 11 November 2010 on simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes 1 , and in the Final Report of the Expert Group on Interim Evaluation of the Seventh Framework Programme, published on 12 November 2010 on the basis of Article 7(2) of Decision No 1982/2006/EC;
1 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-(2010)0401.
1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0401 .
Evropski parlament je v resoluciji z dne 11. novembra 2010 o poenostavitvi izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov ( 2010/2079(INI) ) pozval k poenostavitvi in uskladitvi pravil in postopkov v finančni uredbi.
The European Parliament resolution of 11 November 2010 on simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes (2010/2079 (INI)) called for simplification and harmonisation of rules and procedures in Financial Regulation.
(5) Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 je bila omejena na določitev splošnih načel in temeljnih pravil za celotni proračunski sektor, ki ga zajemata Pogodbi , izvedbena pravila pa so bila določena v Uredbi Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti, da bi zagotovili boljšo hierarhijo pravil in razumljivost Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 .
(5) Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 was confined to stating the broad principles and basic rules governing the whole budgetary sector covered by the Treaties, while the implementing provisions were laid down in Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities 11 in order to produce a better hierarchy of rules and make Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 easier to read.
Na podlagi Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU) se lahko Komisija pooblasti za sprejemanje aktov, ki se splošno uporabljajo in dopolnjujejo ali spreminjajo nekatere nebistvene elemente zakonodajnih aktov.
Under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter the ‘ TFEU ’ ) the Commission may receive delegation to adopt acts of general application to supplement or amendment certain non-essential elements of legislative acts .
Zato bi bilo treba nekatere določbe iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 vključiti v to uredbo.
As a consequence, some provisions laid down in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, should be incorporated into this Regulation .
Podrobna pravila za uporabo te uredbe, ki jih sprejme Komisija, bi morala biti omejena na tehnične podrobnosti in izvedbene postopke.
The detailed rules for the application of this Regulation adopted by the Commission should be confined to technical details and implementing modalities .
Na podlagi člena 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (v nadaljnjem besedilu: PDEU) se lahko z zakonodajnim aktom na Komisijo prenese pristojnost za sprejemanje nezakonodajnih aktov, ki samo dopolnjujejo ali spreminjajo nekatere nebistvene elemente zakonodajnega akta.
Under Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereinafter the ‘ TFEU ’ ) a legislative act may delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts only to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act .
Zato bi bilo treba nekatere določbe iz Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 vključiti v to uredbo.
As a consequence, some provisions laid down in Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, should be incorporated into this Regulation.
Uvodna izjava bi morala bolje odražati novo podlago ustavnega prava.
The recital should better reflect the new constitutional law basis.
(8) Pravila, ki se nanašajo na obresti iz predhodnega financiranja, bi bilo treba poenostaviti, ker povzročajo pretirano upravno breme tako za prejemnike sredstev Unije kot tudi za službe Komisije, poleg tega pa povzročajo nesporazume med službami Komisije ter subjekti in partnerji.
(8) The rules governing interest generated by pre-financing should be simplified as they generate excessive administrative burden on both recipients of Union funds and Commission services and create misunderstandings between the Commission services and operators and partners.
Zaradi poenostavitve, zlasti v zvezi s prejemniki donacij, ter v skladu z načelom dobrega finančnega poslovodenja bi bilo treba odpraviti obveznost ustvarjanja obresti iz predhodnega financiranja in izterjave teh obresti.
For reasons of simplification, in particular in respect of grant beneficiaries, and in line with the principle of sound financial management, there should no longer be an obligation to generate interest on pre-financing and to recover such interest.