natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
šteje kot zelo pozitivno, da si poročilo Sveta prvič prizadeva dati priznanje dejavnosti Evropskega parlamenta, vseeno pa prihodnje finsko predsedstvo poziva, da se pri pripravi osmega letnega poročila EU o človekovih pravicah dejavno posvetuje z Evropskim parlamentom, poroča, kako sta Svet in Komisija upoštevala njegove resolucije, in kot bistveno k pripravi poročila na ustrezen način pritegne predstavnike Parlamenta, tako da bodo v končni različici čim uspešneje izražena stališča Sveta, Komisije in Parlamenta; meni, da mora Evropski parlament nadaljevati z izdajanjem lastnega poročila glede ocene politike EU na področju človekovih pravic kot sredstva izvajanja parlamentarnega nadzora;
Considers it a positive development that the Council's report for the first time endeavours to do justice to the activities of the European Parliament, but invites the future Finnish Presidency in its drafting of the Eighth EU Annual Report on Human Rights to consult actively with the European Parliament, to report on the way that Parliament's resolutions have been taken into account by the Council and the Commission, and to include, as a fundamental element, a role for the Parliament in the drafting of the report in some suitable form so that the final version will be a real attempt to reflect the views of the Council, the Commission and the Parliament; takes the view that the European Parliament must continue to issue its own report in order to assess the EU's human rights policy and to exercise parliamentary control;
predlaga, da Svet v prihodnjih poročilih o človekovih pravicah osrednje mesto nameni analizi in izvajanju smernic EU ter predstavi ocene učinka vsake posamezne smernice, pri čemer naj izpostavi, kako so prispevale k spremembam v tretjih državah;
Suggests that a key priority for the Council in future human rights reports should be the analysis and implementation of the EU's guidelines, as well as the production of impact assessments for each of the guidelines, weighing up their effectiveness in forging change in third countries;
zahteva, da morajo prihodnja letna poročila o človekovih pravicah analizirati, kako se človekove pravice obravnavajo v zunanji razsežnosti drugih politik EU, kot sta razvojna in trgovinska, in sicer tako, da se predstavi, v kolikšnem obsegu EU v odnosih s tretjimi državami uporablja klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji; razen tega v zvezi s tem zahteva, da se v prihodnjih letnih poročilih o človekovih pravicah oceni dejansko izpolnjevanje klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v sporazumih EU, kakor je potrdil Parlament v navedeni resoluciji z dne 14. februarja 2006;
Asks that future annual reports on human rights should analyse how human rights are dealt with within the external dimension of other EU policies, such as development and trade, including by reporting on the extent to which human rights and democracy clauses have been utilised in the EU's relationships with third countries; calls in addition, in this connection, for future annual reports on human rights to assess actual compliance with the human rights and democracy clause in EU agreements, as endorsed by Parliament in its abovementioned resolution of 14 February 2006;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da sta luksemburško predsedstvo in predsedstvo Združenega kraljestva na tem področju medsebojno sodelovala, in izraža zadovoljstvo nad nadaljevanjem tovrstnega pristopa, ki se kaže v sprejetju skupnega letnega programa avstrijskega in finskega predsedstva; meni, da takšno sodelovanje prispeva k večji usklajenosti in doslednosti ukrepov EU, ter upa, da se bo v prihodnosti nadaljevalo in še okrepilo;
Welcomes the cooperation-focused approach of the Luxembourg and UK Presidencies and looks forward to seeing this continue during the Austrian and Finnish Presidencies through the adoption of a joint annual programme; considers that such cooperation should increase the coordination and consistency of EU action and hopes that this trend will continue and be further enhanced in the future;
pozdravlja prizadevanja in zavezo luksemburškega predsedstva ter predsedstva Združenega kraljestva za razvoj metodologije in meril za učinkovitejše izvajanje smernic EU, vključno z ukrepi za tretje države v zvezi s posameznimi primeri, javnimi izjavami in deklaracijami; poudarja pomen vzpostavitve posebnega mehanizma za sistematično zbiranje praks na lokalni ravni s strani vodij misij EU in delegacij Evropske komisije, da se ugotovijo primeri "najboljših in najslabših praks" na terenu, kar lahko omogoči oceno izvajanja na lokalni ravni;
Welcomes the efforts and commitment of the Luxembourg and UK Presidencies to develop a methodology and criteria for more effective implementation of the EU guidelines, including demarches to third countries regarding individual cases, public statements and declarations; and emphasises the importance of setting up a special mechanism for a systematic compilation of practices at local level by the heads of EU missions and Commission delegations, in order to identify examples of "best and bad practices" of implementation on the ground, which could permit an assessment of local implementation;
pozdravlja pobude luksemburškega predsedstva za reševanje problema omejenih sredstev s porazdelitvijo bremena, zgodnjimi pogajanji, združevanjem sredstev in neformalnimi trojkami z drugimi državami članicami za posebna vprašanja; poziva Svet, da razvije ta pristop med drugimi predsedovanji;
Welcomes the initiatives taken by the Luxembourg Presidency to overcome the problem of limited resources through burden-sharing, early negotiations, the pooling of resources and informal troikas with other Member States on particular issues; calls on the Council to develop this approach during other Presidencies;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad pristopom predsedstva Združenega kraljestva v zvezi s smrtno kaznijo, po katerem so bili v skladu s smernicami EU o smrtni kazni pripravljeni ukrepi v državah, kjer je obstajala možnost, da se
Appreciates the approach of the UK Presidency regarding the death penalty, in line with the EU Guidelines on the Death Penalty, undertaking demarches in countries where either a moratorium on the death penalty was in danger of being
odpravi moratorij na smrtno kazen, in v državah, kjer so preučevali notranje postopke za njegovo uvedbo; poziva avstrijsko predsedstvo in vsa prihodnja predsedstva, da sledijo temu zgledu in redno sprejemajo ukrepe za takšne države; poziva vsa predsedstva, da ustrezno nadaljujejo izvajanje sprejetih ukrepov; poziva Komisijo, da od delegacij EU v tistih tretjih državah, ki imajo smrtno kazen, zahteva, da podprejo prizadevanja Sveta za uveljavitev moratorija na smrtno kazen in podvojijo prizadevanja v primerih, ko so v tretjih državah na smrtno kazen obsojeni evropski državljani; skladno s tem pozdravlja resolucijo, ki jo je 21. novembra 2005 v Rabatu sprejela Evro-sredozemska parlamentarna skupščina, s katero ta poziva države partnerice barcelonskega procesa, da podprejo moratorij na smrtno kazen;
lifted or where internal steps aimed at introducing a moratorium were under consideration; asks the Austrian Presidency and all future Presidencies to follow this example to demarche such countries regularly; requests all Presidencies to follow up on demarches previously carried out, as appropriate; calls on the Commission to instruct its delegations in third countries which have the death penalty to support the Council's moves to secure a moratorium and to redouble their efforts in cases of European citizens under sentence of death; welcomes the resolution adopted by the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly in Rabat on 21 November 2005, which calls on the Barcelona Process partner countries to support the moratorium on the death penalty;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je britansko predsedstvo izpolnjevanje obveznosti s področja človekovih pravic opredelilo kot prednostno in kot pogoj za začetek pristopnih pogajanj s Turčijo in Hrvaško, za podelitev statusa države kandidatke Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji in za začetek pogajanj za Stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum s Srbijo in Črno goro ter Bosno in Hercegovino; poziva Komisijo, da spremlja, ali v državah kandidatkah na področju človekovih pravic prihaja do dejanskega napredka, zlasti na področju zaščite manjšin, verske svobode, svobode izražanja, razseljenih oseb in beguncev, oseb z motnjami v duševnem zdravju in/ali duševnem razvoju in na področju sodelovanja z mednarodnim sodiščem, pač v skladu z evropskimi načeli in pravnim redu Skupnosti; zahteva, da Svet in Komisija v pogodbena razmerja z državami kandidatkami in državami v stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenem procesu kot ključno točko vključita izpolnjevanje zahtev konvencij ZN; poudarja pomen pridružitvenega in pristopnega procesa pri zagotavljanju spodbude za izvajanje potrebnih reform na področju človekovih pravic;
Welcomes the priority given to compliance with human rights obligations as part of the steps taken during the UK Presidency to open accession negotiations with Turkey and Croatia, to grant the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia candidate-country status and to open negotiations for Stabilisation and Association Agreements with Serbia- Montenegro and Bosnia-Herzegovina; asks the Commission to ensure that real progress is made by the candidate countries in the field of the human rights, and in particular regarding protection of minorities, religious freedom and freedom of expression, displaced and refugee populations, people with mental health problems and/or intellectual disabilities and cooperation with international justice, in accordance with European principles and the Community acquis; urges the Council and the Commission to include compliance with UN Conventions in contractual relationships with candidate countries and countries in the Stabilisation and Association process as a key issue; underlines the importance of the association and accession process in providing the impetus to carry out necessary human rights reforms;
pozdravlja, da se boj proti trgovini z ljudmi obravnava kot prednostna naloga predsedstev Sveta; poziva EU, da sprejme celosten pristop, osredotočen na človekove pravice, za reševanje tega rastočega pojava;
Notes with approval that combating human trafficking is regarded as a priority of the Council's Presidencies; urges the EU to adopt an integrated, human rights-centred approach to tackling this growing phenomenon;
pozdravlja izbiro svobode izražanja za glavno temo človekovih pravic v času predsedovanja Združenega kraljestva; je zaskrbljen zaradi velikega števila novinarjev po vsem svetu, zlasti na Kitajskem, v Belorusiji, na Kubi in v Severni Koreji, ki so bili obsojeni za domnevno obrekovanje javnih uslužbencev ali politikov; poziva Svet, da se za začetek zavzema za svetovni moratorij takšnega zapiranja novinarjev; vseeno poudarja, da svoboda izražanja ne izključuje medsebojnega spoštovanja in razumevanja med različnimi civilizacijami;
Welcomes the choice of freedom of expression as a major human rights theme during the UK Presidency; is concerned at the high number of journalists worldwide, and in particular in China, Belarus, Cuba and North Korea, being convicted for alleged defamation of public officials or politicians; asks the Council to advocate a worldwide moratorium on such imprisonment of journalists as a first step; stresses, however, that freedom of expression does not exclude mutual respect and understanding between different civilisations;
izraža obžalovanje, ker predsedstvu Združenega kraljestva ni uspelo organizirati tretjega srečanja mreže kontaktnih točk EU za genocid, zločine proti človeštvu in vojne zločine Sklep Sveta 2003/659/PNZ z dne 18. junija 2003 (UL L 245, 29.9.2003, str.
Expresses dismay at the failure of the UK Presidency to organise a third meeting of the EU Network of contact points for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes Council Decision 2003/659/JHA of 18 June 2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p.
, saj gre za neprecenljiv način spodbujenega sodelovanja držav članic EU pri preiskovanju in kazenskemu pregonu mednarodnih zločinov na nacionalni ravni;
, which represents an invaluable means of strengthening cooperation among EU Member States in investigations and prosecutions of international crimes at national level;
Izvajanje dejavnosti Sveta in Komisije na področju človekovi pravic na mednarodnih forumih
Performance of Council and Commission activities in the area of human rights in international fora
spoštuje ciljno usmerjen pristop predsedstva EU in Sveta na 61. zasedanju UNCHR; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja ključno vlogo EU pri sprejemu bistvenih in konstruktivnih resolucij o človekovih pravicah v Demokratični republiki Kongo, Nepalu, Severni Koreji, Sudanu, Uzbekistanu, Turkmenistanu ter o človekovih pravicah in boju proti terorizmu, ter tudi imenovanje posebnih poročevalcev za pripravo načel in smernic o diskriminaciji na podlagi dela in izvora; pozdravlja tudi podporo pri imenovanju posebnega predstavnika, ki bo prispeval h krepitvi standardov človekovih pravic na delovnem mestu;
Appreciates the result-oriented approach of the EU Presidency and the Council in the 61st session of the UNCHR; in this context, welcomes the key role played by the EU in securing critical and constructive resolutions on human rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nepal, North Korea, Sudan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, and on human rights and counter-terrorism and the appointment of Special Rapporteurs to develop principles and guidelines on discrimination based on work and descent; equally welcomes the support given to the appointment of a Special Representative to contribute to the strengthening of standards on human rights at work;
vseeno opozarja Svet na navedeno resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 24. februarja 2005 in v kateri poziva EU, da pripravi resolucije o določenem številu prednostnih vprašanj; obžaluje zlasti zavrnitev pokroviteljstva EU za resolucije o zlorabah človekovih pravic na Kitajskem, v Zimbabveju in Čečeniji; v zvezi s tem opozarja na obveznosti, ki jih je Svet sprejel v okviru smernic EU o dialogih o človekovih pravicah, ki jasno navajajo, da dialog o človekovih pravicah s tretjo državo ne more preprečiti, da bi Svet v Svetu ZN o človekovih pravicah prevzel pokroviteljstvo za resolucijo o zadevni državi; v zvezi s tem upošteva tudi izjavo v poročilu za leto 2005, da zlasti afriška skupina ni želela sodelovati v razpravah o stanju človekovih pravic v nekaterih afriških državah v času delovanja tretjega odbora Generalne skupščine ZN; zato Komisijo in Svet poziva k uporabi vseh razpoložljivih sredstev, da afriško skupino v prihodnosti prepričata k sodelovanju z Generalno skupščino ZN; to naj storita z dialogom in informacijami o afriških državah, zlasti tistih, za katere člen 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU določa začasno prekinitev sodelovanja z AKP-EU, ali tistih, s katerimi poteka politični dialog na podlagi člena 8 navedenega sporazuma; predlaga, da v prihodnosti Evropski parlament pri predložitvi predlogov resolucij Svetu te predloge omeji na ključne države in da odločneje podpira delo Sveta na tem področju;
Reminds the Council, however, of its abovementioned resolution of 24 February 2005, which called on the EU to present resolutions on a certain number of priority issues; regrets, in particular, the EU's refusal to sponsor resolutions on human rights abuses in China, Zimbabwe and Chechnya; recalls, in this regard, the commitments entered into by the Council in the context of the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Dialogues, which clearly state that a human rights dialogue with a third country cannot prevent the Council from sponsoring a resolution on that specific country in the UN Human Rights Council; in this context, also takes account of the statement in the 2005 Report that the African group in particular has not been cooperative when discussing the human rights situation in specific African countries during the proceedings of the UN General Assembly's Third Committee; therefore calls on the Commission and the Council to use all means at their disposal to persuade the African group to cooperate with the UN General Assembly in the future by conducting dialogue and providing information on the African countries concerned, especially those with whom ACP-EU cooperation is suspended under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement or with whom political dialogue is conducted under Article 8 thereof; suggests that the European Parliament should in future, when submitting its proposals for resolutions to the Council, limit them to those relating to key countries of concern, and that it should support more strongly the Council's work in this regard;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da si močno prizadevata za nenehno povezovanje svojih razprav na mednarodnemu forumu z dvostranskimi političnimi dialogi Evropske unije, politiko razvoja in trgovine ter da se izogibata zdajšnjemu položaju, ki državam omogoča, da v mednarodnem forumu nasprotujejo pobudam EU o človekovih pravicah, ne da bi zaradi tega pričakovale negativne posledice na področju dvostranskih odnosov;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to make significant efforts to continuously link their discussions conducted in international fora with the European Union's bilateral political dialogues, development and trade policy, and to avoid the current situation in which countries opposing EU human rights initiatives in international fora can do so with little expectation that they will suffer any adverse consequences in respect of bilateral relations;
zlasti opozarja Svet in Komisijo, da večina zlorab človekovih pravic ne bi bila mogoča v državah z močnejšo tradicijo na področju svobode govora in svobode tiska; zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, da to ključno točko poudarita, kolikor je to mogoče, v vseh političnih dialogih, kot na primer v razvojni in trgovinski politiki;
Specifically reminds the Council and the Commission that most human rights abuses would be impossible in countries with stronger traditions of freedom of speech and press freedom; therefore calls on the Council and the Commission to emphasise this key point as strongly as possible in all political dialogues, as in the case of development and trade policy;
pozdravlja stalno podporo Sveta za ustanovitev močnega, prepričljivega in učinkovitega Sveta ZN za človekove pravice z naslednjimi glavnimi značilnostmi: biti mora stalni organ z zadostnim številom dovolj dolgih zasedanj, da lahko primerno opravlja svoje naloge in se lahko odziva na nujne razmere; ohraniti se mora sistem posebnih postopkov in visoka raven sodelovanja nevladnih organizacij; poziva Svet, da si še naprej prizadeva za določitev standardov za članstvo v novem Svetu, vključno z volilnimi postopki, ki naj vključujejo neposredne in posamezne glasove absolutne večine članov, da bi s tem zagotovili verodostojnost in učinkovitost prihodnjega telesa; v tej zvezi izraža zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da so bile za članice sveta ZN za človekove pravice izvoljene države, ki nezadovoljivo spoštujejo človekove pravice, zato poudarja pomen vzpostavitve na eni strani univerzalnega načina ocenjevanja razmer na področju človekovih pravic v vseh državah in na drugi nadzora nad izvajanjem mednarodnih konvencij in standardov; obžaluje, da so bile v teh pogajanjih proti koncu leta 2005 države članice EU očitno izigrane s strani majhne skupine članic ZN, držav, v katerih je spoštovanje človekovih pravic vprašljivo; vseeno izraža zadovoljstvo nad končnim sporazumom, doseženim v New Yorku, in pričakuje močno in učinkovito zastopanost EU v Svetu ZN za človekove pravice;
Welcomes the Council's continued support for the establishment of a strong, forceful and effective UN Human Rights Council, with the following essential characteristics: it must be a standing body with a sufficient number of sessions of adequate length to enable it to properly perform its mandate, it must be capable of responding to urgent situations, the system of Special Procedures must be retained and the Committee of NGOs should be reformed so as to permit a strong level of independent NGO participation; asks the Council to continue to take action to set standards for membership of the new UN Human Rights Council, including election procedures, involving direct and individual votes by an absolute majority of members, which seek to guarantee the credibility and efficacy of the future body; in this regard, is concerned that countries with a poor human rights record have been elected as members of the UN Human Rights Council, and therefore stresses the importance of establishing a universal "peer review" with the task of examining the human rights situation in all countries and monitoring the implementation of international conventions and standards; regrets that during the latter months of 2005 EU Member States appear to have been out-manoeuvred in the negotiations by a small group of UN members composed of countries which themselves have suspect human rights records; nevertheless welcomes the final agreement secured in New York and looks forward to a strong and effective EU representation in the agreed UN Human Rights Council;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da sistematično nasprotujeta, da bi se državam, ki ne spoštujejo človekovih pravic, podelilo predsedovanje Svetu ZN za človekove pravice;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to systematically oppose the conferment of the presidency of the UN Human Rights Council on countries which fail to respect human rights;
poziva k nadaljnjim prizadevanjem Sveta in Komisije za hitro dosego sporazuma o predlagani konvenciji ZN o pravicah invalidnih oseb in pozdravlja rezultat sedmega zasedanja začasnega odbora, vključno s sporazumom o dopolnitvi osnutka besedila o nasilju nad invalidnimi osebami, človekovih pravicah oseb s kompleksnimi potrebami zaradi odvisnosti in pravicah gluhih do uporabe znakovnega jezika; države članice, Svet in Komisijo poziva, da podprejo nadaljnje dopolnjevanje obstoječega osnutka besedila v zvezi z neprostovoljnim zdravljenjem invalidnih oseb in poziva k podpori trenutnim prizadevanjem v zvezi z mednarodnim sodelovanjem za podporo invalidnim osebam v državah v razvoju ter k močnejšemu in neodvisnemu mehanizmu za spremljanje in izvajanje, ki lahko obravnava posamezne pritožbe;
Calls for continued support from the Council and the Commission for the speedy agreement of the proposed UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities; welcomes the outcome of the 7th Ad Hoc Committee session including agreement on strengthening the draft text in relation to violence against disabled people, the human rights of people with complex dependence needs and the right of deaf people to use sign language; calls on the Member States, the Council and the Commission to support a further strengthening of the existing draft text in relation to the involuntary treatment of people with disabilities and in respect of its implementation; calls for support for current efforts regarding international cooperation aimed at supporting disabled people in developing countries, and for a strong and independent monitoring and enforcement mechanism capable of receiving and handling individual complaints;
na splošno meni, da so dejavnosti EU v ZN v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami preveč vase usmerjene; poziva Svet, da si prizadeva pospešiti proces posvetovanja, da bi omogočil več časa za posvetovanje s partnerji, ki niso člani EU; poziva Svet, da preuči možnost, da bi COHOM (Delovna skupina za človekove pravice) zagotovila le pogajalski okvir za predstavnike EU, ki so prisotni na mednarodnih forumih, in da bi nanje prenesel pristojnost za sprejemanje začasnih odločitev, če je to potrebno;
In general, considers that EU activities in the UN with respect to human rights are too introverted; asks the Council to endeavour to speed up the consultation process so as to allow more time for consultation with non-EU partners; asks the Council to consider having its Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM) provide only a negotiation framework to EU representatives present at international fora and to delegate to those representatives authority to make ad hoc decisions as necessary;