natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11. je zaskrbljen zaradi endemične revščine v Jemnu, izginjanja tamkajšnjih vodnih virov, slabe infrastrukture, naraščanja stroškov za hrano in drugih socialno-ekonomskih stisk; vztraja, naj EU ponudi svojo pomoč pri reševanju teh težav, s čimer bo zmanjšala privlačnost islamskih skupin, kot je Al Kajda;
Expresses its concern for the endemic poverty within Yemen, the depletion of its water supplies, poor infrastructure, the rise in food costs and other socio-economic complaints; insists that the EU lend its support to addressing these problems as a means to diffusing the appeal of Islamist groups such as al-Qaeda;
PE465.719v01-00 B7‑0391/2011 Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o načinih za morebitno ustanovitev Evropske ustanove za demokracijo
PE465.719v01-00 B7‑0391/2011 European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the modalities for the possible establishment of a European Endowment for Democracy
– ob upoštevanju dveh sklopov sklepov Sveta o podpori demokraciji v zunanjih odnosih Evropske unije, z dne 17. novembra 2009 in 13. decembra 2010, ki vsebujejo poročilo o napredku za leto 2010 in seznam pilotnih držav,
– having regard to the two sets of Council conclusions on ‘Democracy support in the EU’s external relations’: those of 17 November 2009 and those of 13 December 2010 containing the ‘2010 progress report and list of pilot countries’,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o krepitvi demokracije v zunanjih odnosih EU UL C 265 E, 30.9.2010, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 22 October 2009 on democracy building in the EU’s external relations OJ C 265E, 30.9.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2002 o sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Vloga Evropske unije pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic in demokratizacije v tretjih državah ( KOM(2001)0252 ) UL C 131 E, 5.6.2003, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2002 on the Commission communication entitled ‘The European Union’s role in promoting human rights and democratisation in third countries’ ( COM(2001)0252 ) OJ C 131E, 5.6.2003, p.
A. ker so politične stranke ter svobodno in pošteno izvoljeni parlamenti bistveni za vsako demokracijo in proces demokratizacije, ter ker podpora za evropski instrument za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) in njegova uporaba še nista skladni s pomembnostjo teh akterjev v preteklosti,
A. whereas political parties and freely and fairly elected parliaments are centrally important to each democracy and democratisation process, and whereas support for, and application of the EIDHR has not yet corresponded to the importance of these actors in the past,
B. ker je treba okrepiti ureditev političnih strank, zlasti tistih, ki spodbujajo demokratične vrednote, ne da bi pri tem zavzeli določeno stran,
B. whereas there is the need to strengthen the organisation of political parties, particularly those that promote democratic values, without taking sides,
C. ker je podpora za nove, svobodno in pošteno izvoljene parlamente, predvsem v državah, ki so v procesu tranzicije ali v katerih je EU napotila misije za spremljanje volitev, izrednega pomena,
C. whereas the support for new, freely and fairly elected parliaments, especially in countries in transition and those to which the EU has sent election observation missions is of utmost importance,
(a) naj upošteva, da Evropska unija potrebuje prožnejši in manj birokratski instrument, ki bi političnim akterjem pomagala pri prizadevanju za demokratične spremembe v njihovih državah,
(a) to consider that the European Union needs a more flexible and less bureaucratic instrument to assist political actors striving for democratic change in their countries,
(b) naj predvidi ustanovitev Evropske ustanove za demokracijo kot neprofitne organizacije, ki bo podeljevala donacije, ter krepila demokratične institucije po vsem svetu,
(b) to envisage the establishment of an EED as a non-profit, grant-making organisation created to strengthen democratic institutions around the world,
(d) naj spoštuje pravico Evropskega parlamenta do nadzora v procesu ustanovitve morebitne prihodnje Evropske ustanove za demokracijo, pri opredelitvi letnih ciljev, prednostnih nalog, pričakovanih rezultatov in dodeljenih finančnih sredstev na splošno;
(d) to respect the right of scrutiny for the European Parliament in the process of setting up the possible future EED, in the determination of annual objectives, priorities, expected results and financial allocations in broad terms;
o spremembah v zvezi s Schengnom
on changes to Schengen
PE465.720v01-00 B7‑0392/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o spremembah v zvezi s Schengnom
PE465.720v01-00 B7‑0392/2011 European Parliament resolution on changes to Schengen
– ob upoštevanju člena 2 PEU in členov 18, 20, 21, 67, 77, 80 PDEU,
– having regard to Article 2 TEU and to articles 18, 20, 21, 67, 77, 80 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
– having regard to article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 24. junija 2011,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 24 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Evropske komisije o migraciji z dne 5. maja 2011 ( KOM(2011)0248 konč.),
– having regard to the European Commission Communication on Migration of 5 May 2011, COM(2011) 248 final,
– ob upoštevanju schengenskega sporazumaz dne 14. junija 1985,
– having regard to the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o izvajanju Schengenskega sporazuma z dne 19. junija 1990,
– having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 19 June 1990,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic,
– having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah),
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda ( KOM(2010)0624 – C7-0370/2010 – 2010/0312(COD) ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis ( COM(2010)0624 – C7 0370/2010 – 2010/0312(COD) ),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka poročila o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda ( KOM(2010)0624 ),
– having regard to the draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis( COM(2010)0624 ),
A. ker je bila ustanovitev schengenskega območja in vključitev schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir EU eden največjih dosežkov procesa evropske integracije, s katerim je bila odpravljena kontrola potnikov na notranjih mejah in prvič zagotovljena svoboda gibanja znotraj EU,
A. whereas the creation of the Schengen area and the integration of the Schengen acquis into the EU framework is one of the greatest achievements of the European integration process, marked by the removal of controls on persons at internal borders and by unprecedented freedom of movement inside the EU,
B. ker je svoboda gibanja postala steber državljanstva EU in eden od temeljev Evropske unije kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki vključuje pravico do prostega gibanja in bivanja v vseh državah članicah, pri čemer veljajo enake pravice, zaščita in garancije, vključno s prepovedjo diskriminacije na podlagi nacionalnosti,
B. whereas freedom of movement has become one of the pillars of EU citizenship and one of the foundations of the European Union as an area of freedom, security and justice, enshrining the right to move and reside freely in all Member States enjoying the same rights, protections and guarantees, including the ban of any discrimination on the grounds of nationality,
C. ker so schengenski predpisi, ki določajo pogoje v zvezi z gibanjem oseb preko notranjih meja, določeni v Zakoniku o schengenskih mejah, in so v členih od 23 do 26 že določeni natančni ukrepi in postopki za začasno ponovno uvedbo mejnih kontrol na notranjih mejah,
C. whereas the Schengen rules governing the conditions for the movement of persons across internal borders have been defined in the Schengen Borders Code, whose articles 23 to 26 already set out precise measures and procedures for the temporary reintroduction of border controls at internal borders,
D. ker se lahko v skladu z Zakonikom o schengenskih mejah in členom 45 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah svoboda gibanja znotraj EU pod natančnimi pogoji razširi tudi na državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito bivajo v EU,
D. whereas according to the Schengen Borders Code and to article 45 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, freedom of movement in the EU may be extended at precise conditions also to third country nationals legally residing in the EU,
E. ker se mehanizem evalvacije, ki temelji na povsem medvladnem telesu, in sicer na delovni skupini za schengensko evalvacijo (SCH-EVAL), ni izkazal za zadosti učinkovitega,
E. whereas the evaluation mechanism based on the Schengen Evaluation Working Group (SCH-EVAL), a purely intergovernmental body, has not proven sufficiently effective,
F. ker je bil v predlogu uredbe o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda določen nov mehanizem ocenjevanja, ki ga sedaj v okviru rednega zakonodajnega postopka obravnava Evropski parlament; ker ta mehanizem že določa postopke, načela in sredstva za podporo in ocenjevanje skladnosti držav članic s schengenskim pravnim redom, tudi v primeru nepredvidenih dogodkov,
F. whereas a new evaluation mechanism has been set out in the proposal for a Regulation establishing an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis, currently being examined in ordinary legislative procedure by the EP; that this mechanism already defines procedures, principles and tools for supporting and assessing Member states’ compliance with the Schengen acquis, also in presence of unforeseen events,
1. ponovno poudarja, da je svoboda gibanja v Evropskem območju svobode, varnosti in pravice temeljna pravica in steber državljanstva EU, pogoji njegovega izvajanja pa so določeni s Pogodbami in z Direktivo 38/2004;
Recalls that freedom of movement in a European area of freedom, security and justice is a fundamental right and a pillar of EU citizenship, whose conditions of exercise are laid out in the Treaties and in Directive 2004/38/EC;
PE465.721v01-00 B7‑0393/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o spremembah v zvezi s Schengnom
PE465.721v01-00 B7‑0393/2011 European Parliament resolution on changes to Schengen
– ob upoštevanju člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Article 2 of the TEU,
– ob upoštevanju členov 18, 20, 21, 67, 77, 80 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 18, 20, 21, 67, 77, 80 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju Schengenske konvencije in zakonika Skupnosti o mejah,
– having regard to the Schengen Convention and the Schengen Borders Code,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic,
– having regard to the Directive 2004/38/EC on the Right of Citizens of the EU and their family Members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda KOM 2010/0624,
– having regard to the Proposal for a Regulation on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis COM 2010/0624,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o migracijah (KOM 2011/248/2) z dne 4. maja 2011,
– having regard to the Commission Communication on migration (COM 2011/248/2) on 4 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 9. junija 2011,
– having regard to the Justice and Home Affairs Council conclusions of 9 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 23. in 26. junija 2011,
– having regard to the European Council Conclusions of 23 and 24 of June 2011,
A. ker je vzpostavitev schengenskega območja konec 80-ih in v začetku 90-ih let eden največjih dosežkov v evropski zgodovini, ki sta ga zaznamovala odprava nadzora na skupnih mejah in uvedba prostega gibanja na tem območju,
A. whereas the creation of the Schengen area in the late 1980s and early 1990s was one of European history's greatest successes, characterised by the absence of controls at shared borders between participating countries and the introduction of freedom of movement within this area,
B. ker je nastala enotna zunanja meja in so bili uvedeni različni izravnalni ukrepi, zlasti krepitev nadzora na zunanjih mejah ter krepitev policijskega, carinskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja, vzpostavitev schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS) in skupna vizumska politika,
B. whereas a single external border has been created and various compensatory measures were implemented, namely the strengthening of controls at external borders and of police, customs and judicial cooperation, the creation of the Schengen Information System (SIS) and a common visa policy,
C. ker odprava nadzora na notranjih mejah zahteva, da si države članice medsebojno popolnoma zaupajo, da so sposobne v celoti izvajati spremljevalne ukrepe, ki omogočajo odpravo tega nadzora,
C. whereas the abolition of internal border controls requires full mutual trust between the Member States in their capacity to fully implement the accompanying measures allowing those controls to be lifted,
D. ker je schengenski sporazum mejnik v evropski integraciji in ker schengensko območje po več uspešnih širitvah zdaj obsega ozemlje 25 evropskih držav, v katerih prebiva 400 milijonov ljudi na območju 4 312 099 km 2 ,
D. whereas the Schengen Agreement is a milestone in European integration and, the Schengen area after several successful enlargements comprises now the territories of 25 European countries, covering a population of over 400 million people and an area of 4 312 099 km 2 ,
I. ker so nekatere države članice pred nedavnim izvajale pritisk na ta sistem, saj so zaradi nenadnega, velikanskega migracijskega toka priseljencev razmišljale o ponovni uvedbi nadzora na nacionalnih mejah,
I. whereas the system has been, recently, under pressure with some Member States considering the reintroduction of national border controls in face of the sudden and enormous migratory inflow of immigrants,
J. ker je evropska komisarka za notranje zadeve Cecilia Malmström četrtega maja predstavila kar nekaj pobud za bolj strukturiran, celovit in hitroodzivni pristop EU k izzivom in priložnostim preseljevanja, pri katerih je upoštevala zlasti nedavne dogodke v Sredozemlju,
J. whereas on the 4th of May the EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmström has presented several initiatives for a more structured, comprehensive, rapid-response approach from the EU to the challenges and opportunities of migration, especially taking into account the recent developments in the Mediterranean,
K. ker mora Komisija na podlagi sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 23. in 24. junija 2011 predstaviti predlog za zaščitni mehanizem, ki bi omogočal odzivanje na izredne okoliščine, ki bi lahko ogrozile celotno delovanje schengenskega sodelovanja, ne da bi ogrozil načelo prostega pretoka oseb,
K. whereas the European Council Conclusions of the 23 and 24 June 2011 demand the Commission to present a proposal concerning a safeguard mechanism in order to respond to exceptional circumstances that might put the overall functioning of Schengen cooperation at risk, but without jeopardising the principle of free movement of persons,
L. ker bi moral ta izvedljivi mehanizem obsegati več ukrepov, ki bi se uporabili postopoma, diferencirano in usklajeno, da bi pomagali državam članicam, ki doživljajo hud pritisk na zunanjih mejah,
L. whereas this possible mechanism should comprise a series of measures to be applied in a gradual, differentiated and coordinated manner in order to assist a Member State facing heavy pressure at the external borders,
1. priznava, da je prosti pretok ljudi čez evropske meje pomemben dosežek, pravzaprav eden glavnih stebrov EU, ki ga nikakor ni mogoče ukiniti, temveč ga je treba okrepiti;
Recognises that the free movement of people across European borders is a major achievement, in fact, one of the main pillars of the EU, that cannot by any means be reversed, but instead of that it should be strengthened;
8. ponovno poudarja, da je treba odpraviti dvojne standarde v Schengnu, kjer se od vseh držav kandidatk zelo veliko zahteva, države, ki so že članice schengenskega območja, pa se obravnavajo zelo popustljivo;
Recalls the need to finish with the existence of double standards in Schengen, where high demands are made to all candidate countries and the countries that are already Members of the Schengen area are treated in a very complacent way;
10. meni, da je učinkovitost tega sistema odvisna od možnosti uporabe sankcij, če se pomanjkljivosti ne odpravijo in so take, da bi lahko ogrozile splošno varnost schengenskega območja;
Believes that the effectiveness of this system relies on the possibility of the application of sanctions, in case the deficiencies persist and are such that they might put at stake the overall security of the Schengen area;
12. pričakuje, da bo za zaščito schengenskega območja in ohranitev njegove stabilnosti verjetno treba predvideti možnost začasne ponovne uvedbe omejenega nadzora na notranjih mejah v skrajno izjemnih okoliščinah, vendar le v skrajnem primeru in ob privolitvi institucij EU ter nikoli kot enostranski ukrep;
Foresees that in order to protect the Schengen area and to safeguard its stability, it may also be necessary to foresee the possibility of temporary re-introduction of limited internal border controls under very exceptional circumstances, as a last resource and only with the consent of the EU institutions and never in a unilateral way;
o pripravah na decembrske volitve v dumo Ruske federacije
on the preparations for the Russian State Duma elections in December
PE465.724v01-00 B7‑0396/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pripravah na decembrske volitve v dumo Ruske federacije
PE465.724v01-00 B7‑0396/2011 European Parliament resolution on the preparations for the Russian State Duma elections in December
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Rusiji, zlasti z dne 17. februarja 2011 o pravni državi v Rusiji in z dne 9. junija 2011 o vrhunskem srečanju med EU in Rusijo,
– having regard to its previous on Russia with regard, in particular, to the one of 17 February 2011 on the Rule of Law in Russia, the one of 9 June 2011 on the EU/Russia Summit in Nizhny Novgorod,
– ob upoštevanju potekajočih pogajanj, ki so se začela leta 2008 o novem sporazumu, ki bo zagotovil nov celostni okvir za odnose med EU in Rusijo, ter partnerstva za modernizacijo, sklenjenega leta 2010,
– having regard to the ongoing negotiations initiated in 2008 for a new agreement providing a new comprehensive framework for EU-Russia relations, as well as to the 'Partnership for Modernisation ' initiated in 2010,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah med EU in Rusijo, zlasti zadnjega srečanja 4. maja 2011,
– having regard to the EU-Russia Consultations on Human Rights and in particular to the latest meeting held on 4 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izjave predstavnika visoke predstavnice Catherine Ashton o registraciji strank v Rusiji z dne 22. junija 2011,
– having regard to the statement by the spokesperson of High Representative Catherine Ashton on party registration in Russia of 22 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izjave visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko z dne 24. maja 2011 o primeru Mihajla Hodorkovskega in Platona Lebedjeva,
– having regard to the statement by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 24 May 2011, on the Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev case,
A. ker je kljub vse večji trgovinski in gospodarski soodvisnosti v odnosih med EU in Rusijo opaziti le majhen napredek zaradi nerazumevanja in nezaupanja glede temeljnih političnih in gospodarskih vprašanj, kar preprečuje, da bi strani zgradili pravo strateško partnerstvo,
A. whereas in spite of the growing trade and economic interdependence the relations between the EU and Russia are making limited progress due to misunderstanding and mistrust on fundamental political and economic issues that have prevented the parties from building a genuine strategic partnership,
B. ker bi z novim sporazumom, s katerim bi nadomestili sporazum o partnerstvu in sodelovanju iz leta 1997, zagotovili celosten okvir za poglobljene in okrepljene odnose, dokler pogajanja potekajo v dobri veri in obe strani izpolnjujeta vse obveznosti,
B. whereas the new agreement replacing the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement of 1997 could provide the comprehensive framework for deeper and strengthened relations as long as negotiations are carried on in good faith and all the commitments are fully respected by both sides,
C. ker je svoboda izražanja, zbiranja in združevanja v Ruski federaciji še vedno ogrožena kljub pozitivnejšemu pristopu ruskih organov ter ker so pobude in dejavnosti zagovornikov človekovih pravic, neodvisnih organizacij civilne družbe, političnih nasprotnikov, neodvisnih medijev in običajnih državljanov pogosto omejene ali ovirane,
C. whereas in spite of a more positive approach by the Russian authorities freedoms of expression, association and assembly in Russian Federation are still threatened and the initiatives and activities of human rights defenders, independent civil society organizations, political opponents, independent media and ordinary citizens are often restricted or hindered,
D. ker so številna sojenja in sodni postopki v zadnjih letih, vključno z nedavnim primerom Mihajla Hodorkovskega in Platona Lebedjeva, vzbudili dvome o neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti sodnih ustanov Ruske federacije; ker so politično vmešavanje, postopkovne pomanjkljivosti, korupcija, zaprtost, nepravičnost in grožnje, usmerjene proti pričam, še vedno velika ovira za doseganje pravice v Rusiji,
D. whereas several trials and judicial proceedings over the last years, including recently the cases of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev, called into question the independence and the impartiality of the judicial institutions of the Russian Federation; whereas political interference, procedural shortcomings, corruption, closeness, unfairness and threats towards the witnesses remain a severe impediment for delivery of justice in Russia,