natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja Komisijo, da skladen in usklajen računovodski sistem v Evropski uniji pospešuje trgovino na notranjem trgu, vendar obstoječa računovodska pravila prekomerno obremenjujejo mikro podjetja, kot so majhni trgovci ali obrtniki; opozarja, da ta podjetja nimajo čezmejnega učinka na notranji trg ali na konkurenco v EU, če so dejavna predvsem v eni državi članici na lokalni ali regionalni ravni; zato bi morale države članice imeti možnost, da ta podjetja v celoti ali deloma izvzamejo iz zakonskih računovodskih obveznosti;
Reminds the Commission that, while a coherent and harmonised accounting system in the European Union facilitates trade within the internal market, micro-entities are excessively burdened by existing accounting rules; that those companies may, for example, be small retailers or handicraft businesses; that, where those undertakings are active mainly within one Member State at local or regional level, they have no cross-border impact on the internal market or on competition within the EU; and that Member States should therefore have the option of fully or partly exempting those companies from statutory accounting obligations;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži zakonodajni predlog, ki bo državam članicam omogočal, da iz področja uporabe četrte in sedme direktive o pravu družb izvzamejo podjetja, ki na dan svoje bilance stanja ne presegajo meje dveh od naslednjih meril:
Calls on the Commission to present a legislative proposal that allows Member States to exempt from the scope of the 4th and 7th Company Law Directives companies which – on the basis of their balance-sheet data – do not exceed the limits of two of the following three criteria:
bilančna vsota: 500 000 EUR,
balance sheet total: EUR 500 000
čisti prihodki iz prodaje: 1 000 000 EUR,
net turnover: EUR 1 000 000
povprečno število zaposlenih v poslovnem letu: 10;
average number of employees during the financial year: 10
poslovne dejavnosti teh podjetij pa se izvajajo na lokalni ali regionalni ravni znotraj ene države članice;
if the business activities of those companies are conducted at local or regional level within one Member State;
poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za revizijo četrte in sedme direktive o pravu družb ter naj pred koncem leta 2009 predstavi enoten evropski računovodski okvir, da bi pospešila poenostavitev in uskladitev prava družb in še posebej računovodskih pravil na notranjem trgu; opozarja Komisijo, da bo enotni standard zmanjšal upravno breme za mala in srednje velika podjetja in povečal preglednost za vse zainteresirane strani ter da je treba poenostavitev v veliki meri spodbujati tudi s strukturirano uvedbo razširljivega jezika za poslovno poročanje (XBRL - Extensible Business Reporting Language) na evropski ravni;
Calls on the Commission, with a view to stimulating simplification and harmonisation of company law and in particular of accounting rules within the internal market, to continue its efforts to review the 4th and 7th Company Law Directives and to present a uniform European accountancy framework before the end of 2009; reminds the Commission that a uniform standard will reduce the administrative burden for all small and medium-sized companies and will increase transparency for all relevant stakeholders, and that simplification should also be greatly stimulated by a structured European introduction of XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language);
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. decembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o evropskih javnih listinah ( 2008/2124(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on the European Authentic Act ( 2008/2124(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. maja 2005 z naslovom "Haaški program: Deset prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let.
having regard to the Commission's communication of 10 May 2005 entitled "The Hague Programme: Ten priorities for the next five years.
Partnerstvo za evropsko prenovo na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice" ( KOM(2005)0184 ),
The Partnership for European renewal in the field of Freedom, Security and Justice" ( COM(2005)0184 ),
ob upoštevanju primerjalne študije o javnih listinah, ki jo je opravil Odbor za pravne zadeve,
having regard the comparative study on authentic instruments conducted for the Committee on Legal Affairs,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0451/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0451/2008 ),
ker je v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu o Haaškem programu Komisija kot eno prednostnih nalog navedla, da je treba zajamčiti resnični evropski prostor za civilno pravosodje, še zlasti kar zadeva priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb; ker je s ciljem večjega vzajemnega zaupanja v Evropski uniji program kot osrednjo prednostno nalogo za prihajajoča leta opredelil nadaljnje izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja kot konkretne oblike varstva pravic državljanov in načina za njihovo uporabo tudi v drugih državah članicah,
whereas, in its aforesaid communication on the Hague Programme, the Commission singled out, as one of its priorities, the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions; whereas, with the aim of strengthening mutual trust within the European Union, that programme stated that continued implementation of the principle of mutual recognition was a main priority in the coming years, as mutual recognition is a specific means of protecting the rights of citizens and guaranteeing their application across borders in Europe,
ker Haaški program predvideva, da je nadaljnje izvajanje programa vzajemnega priznavanja osrednja prednostna naloga in da ga je treba dokončno izvesti do leta 2011,
whereas the Hague Programme states that continued implementation of the programme of mutual recognition is a main priority and that this should be completed by 2011,
ker je pretok državljanov znotraj Evropske unije vedno večji; ker zaradi tega vedno pogosteje prihaja do pravnih položajev, ki zadevajo dve državi članici ali več,
whereas there is a steady increase in the movement of citizens within the Union; whereas there is therefore a development in the number of legal situations concerning two or more Member States,
ker sektorski in neusklajeni pristop k skupni zakonodaji na tem področju ni zadovoljiv Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 Sveta (UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
whereas the sectoral and inconsistent approach taken by Community legislation in this field is not satisfactory Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 (OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
1); Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 805/2004 (UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
1); Council Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 (OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
ker je treba evropske državljane zaščititi pri njihovih družinskih in dednih čezmejnih odnosih,
whereas there is a need to protect European citizens in their cross-border family and property relationships,
ker imajo podjetja vse več ustanov v tujini in se njihova dejavnost odvija znotraj Skupnosti, zaradi česar javne listine o ustanovitvi in delovanju podjetij krožijo vse pogosteje,
whereas businesses have more and more branches abroad and intra-Community activities that result in the greater movement of authentic acts relating to the setting-up and operation of businesses,
ker je temeljnega pomena, da se v Uniji vzpostavi jasen in celovit pravni okvir, ki bo državljanom in gospodarskim subjektom jamčil varen in predvidljiv pravni položaj ter postopke, ki jih izvajajo pooblaščenci javnih organov,
whereas it is essential to establish a clear and comprehensive legal framework for the Union that guarantees citizens and economic operators the certainty and predictability of legal situations and transactions drawn up by those delegated with public authority,
ker je oblikovanje učinkovitega evropskega pravosodnega prostora v sodnih postopkih odvisno od čezmejnega priznavanja sodnih odločitev določenega sodišča ali upravnega organa, v izvensodnih postopkih pa od čezmejnega priznavanja javnih listin, ki jih je sestavil ali overil sodni organ ali javni uslužbenec oziroma oseba javnega zaupanja, imenovana z nalogo overjanja listin,
whereas the creation of a genuine European legal area is based, in the field of litigation, on the cross-border recognition of legal decisions made by a court or administrative authority and, in non-judicial matters, on the cross-border recognition of authentic acts drawn up or registered by a judicial authority or by public officials appointed to authenticate legal acts,
ker se za javne listine, ki jih izdajo javni organi, uporabljajo uredbe s področja vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločitev,
whereas the existing regulations on the mutual recognition of legal decisions apply to authentic acts when these emanate from the public authorities,
ker je osnovni pogoj za dokazno moč javne listine priznavanje njene verodostojnosti in ker jo je v tem smislu izdal javni uslužbenec ali oseba javnega zaupanja, pooblaščena za sestavljanje javnih listin, ali drug javni organ; ker vzajemno zaupanje pravosodne sisteme držav članic upravičuje, da se postopki preverjanja pristnosti listine v prihodnje uporabljajo samo ob resnem dvomu glede njene verodostojnosti,
whereas the prerequisite for the probative value of an authentic act is recognition of its authenticity, in that it emanates from a public official vested with the power to draw up authentic acts or from a public authority; whereas mutual trust in the legal systems of the Member States justifies making authenticity verification procedures only applicable in future when serious doubts arise as to the veracity of the document,
ker upoštevanje zakonodaje države članice, na čigar ozemlju se mora listina predložiti z namenom njene uporabe, vseeno predpostavlja gotovost, da priznavanje dokazne moči ne pomeni, da tuja javna listina zaradi priznavanja v državi članici, v kateri se mora predložiti, uživa večjo dokazno moč kot javne listine v tej državi članici; ker bi materialno področje uporabe zahtevane uredbe moralo zajemati bistveni del civilnega in gospodarskega prava, z izjemo nekaterih natančno opredeljenih zadev,
whereas respect for the legislation of the Member State on the territory of which the act is to be produced for use nevertheless entails the certainty that recognition of the probative value does not mean that the foreign authentic act enjoys a greater probative value than national authentic acts in that Member State by virtue of its recognition in the Member State in which it is to be produced; whereas the material scope of the Regulation requested should cover an essential part of civil and commercial law, with the exception of certain clearly defined matters,
ker razlike v strukturi in organizaciji sistemov javnih registrov s področja lastnine nepremičnin, pa tudi razlike v značaju in stopnji javnega zaupanja vanje, narekujejo izključitev prenosa stvarnih nepremičninskih pravic iz prihodnjega instrumenta Skupnosti, in sicer zaradi precejšnje soodvisnosti med načinom izdajanja javnih listin na eni strani in vpisa v javni register na drugi,
whereas differences in the structure and organisation of public registry systems in the field of immoveable property, as well as differences concerning the nature and scale of the public confidence placed in them, mean that the transfer of immoveable property rights has to be excluded from a future Community instrument, given the close correlation between the method of drawing up an authentic act and entry in the public register,
ker za priznavanje sodnih odločb po Evropski uniji takšna izključitev pomeni, da so za pritožbe v zvezi s stvarnimi nepremičninskimi pravicami izključno pristojna sodišča, na območju katerih leži nepremičnina, za pritožbe v zvezi z veljavnostjo vpisa v javni register pa sodišča, na ozemlju katerih se javni register vodi Glej člen 22(1) in (3) Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001.
whereas, as regards the recognition of legal decisions across the Union, this exclusion corresponds to attributing exclusive competence to the courts of the place where the property is situated for all appeals relating to immoveable property rights and to the courts on the territory where the public register is kept for all appeals relating to the validity of entries in the public register See Article 22, points 1 and 3, of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.
ker se zahtevana uredba ne sme uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi z veljavnim pravom, opredeljenim z drugimi instrumenti Skupnosti, niti za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo, organiziranostjo in strukturo organov in javnih uslužbencev oziroma oseb javnega zaupanja, vključno s postopkom overjanja, ki spadajo v pristojnost držav članic,
whereas the Regulation requested may not apply either to matters relating to the applicable law covered by other Community instruments or to questions relating to the competence, organisation and structure of public authorities and officials, including the authentication procedure, which come under the jurisdiction of the Member States,
meni, da vzajemno zaupanje v pravosodju znotraj Skupnosti upravičuje, da se v prihodnje odpravijo postopki, vezani na preverjanje verodostojnosti javnih listin v čezmejnih zadevah; meni, da se priznavanje javne listine za namene njene uporabe v zaprošeni državi članici lahko zavrne samo v primeru resnega in utemeljenega dvoma glede njene verodostojnosti ali če je priznavanje v nasprotju z javnim redom zaprošene države članice;
Considers that mutual trust in the field of law within the Community justifies the future abolition of procedures for checking the accuracy of authentic acts in cross-border matters; considers that this recognition of an authentic act for the purpose of its use in the requested Member State can only be refused in the case of serious and substantiated doubts as to its authenticity, or if recognition is contrary to public policy in the Member State requested;
poziva Komisijo, naj mu na osnovi člena 65(a) in druge alineje člena 67(5) Pogodbe ES predloži zakonodajni predlog o vzpostavitvi vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanja javnih listin;
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament, on the basis of Article 65(a) and the second indent of Article 67(5) of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on establishing the mutual recognition and enforcement of authentic acts;
poudarja, da priznavanje listin ne more imeti za posledico tega, da bi tuja listina dobila večji učinek, kot bi ga imela domača;
Stresses that recognition may not result in giving a foreign act greater effect than a national act would have;
želi, da bi se zahtevana uredba uporabljala za vse javne listine v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, razen tistih, ki se nanašajo na nepremičnine in morajo biti ali so lahko predmet vpisa ali zaznamka v javni register;
Asks that the Regulation requested apply to all authentic acts in civil and commercial matters except those which relate to immoveable property and which must or may be subject to entry or mention in a public register;
poudarja, da se zahtevana uredba ne bi smela uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi s predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za vsebino javne listine, niti za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo, organiziranostjo in strukturo organov, javnih uslužbencev ali oseb javnega zaupanja, vključno s postopkom overjanja;
Specifies that the Regulation requested should not apply either to matters relating to the law applicable to the subject-matter of the authentic act or to questions relating to the competence, organisation and structure of public authorities and officials, including the authentication procedure;
ugotavlja, da priporočila, navedena v prilogi, spoštujejo načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter temeljne pravice državljanov;
Notes, in this context, that the recommendations annexed hereto respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and the fundamental rights of citizens;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in spremljajoča natančna priporočila posreduje Komisiji in Svetu ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations to the Commission and the Council, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Priznavanje javne listine za namene njene uporabe v zaprošeni državi članici se lahko zavrne samo v primeru resnega in utemeljenega dvoma glede njene verodostojnosti ali če je priznavanje v nasprotju z javnim redom zaprošene države članice.
This recognition of an authentic act for the purpose of its use in the requested Member State can only be refused where there is serious and substantiated doubt as to its authenticity, or if recognition is contrary to public policy in the Member State requested.
Parlament poziva Komisijo, naj mu na osnovi člena 65(a) in druga alineje člena 67(5) Pogodbe ES predloži zakonodajni predlog o vzpostavitvi vzajemnega priznavanja in izvrševanja javnih listin.
Parliament requests the Commission to submit to it, on the basis of Article 65(a) and the second indent of Article 67(5) of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal on establishing the mutual recognition and enforcement of authentic acts.
Akt iz tega zakonodajnega predloga bi se moral uporabljati za vse javne listine v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, razen tistih, ki se nanašajo na nepremičnine in morajo biti ali so lahko predmet vpisa ali zaznamka v javni register.
4 The act that is the subject of the legislative proposal should apply to all authentic acts in civil and commercial matters except those which relate to immoveable property and which must or may be subject to entry or mention in a public register.
Ne bi se smel uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi s predpisi, ki se uporabljajo za vsebino javne listine niti za vprašanja v zvezi s pristojnostjo, organiziranostjo in strukturo organov, javnih uslužbencev ali oseb javnega zaupanja, vključno s postopkom overjanja.
It should not apply either to matters relating to the law applicable to the subject-matter of the authentic act or to questions relating to the competence, organisation and structure of public authorities and officials, including the authentication procedure.
ob upoštevanju dela delovne skupine Sveta za obdelavo pravnih podatkov (e-pravosodje),
having regard to the work of the Council's Working Party on Legal Data Processing (e-Justice),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 30. maja 2008 z naslovom "Za evropsko strategijo na področju e-pravosodja" ( KOM(2008)0329 ),
having regard to the Commission's communication of 30 May 2008 entitled "Towards a European e-Justice Strategy" ( COM(2008)0329 ),
ob upoštevanju dela, ki ga na tem področju opravlja evropska komisija Sveta Evrope za učinkovitost pravosodja,
having regard to the ongoing work carried out in this field by the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) at the Council of Europe,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0467/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0467/2008 ),
ker se je Svet leta 2007 odločil, da začne z razvojem uporabe informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije na evropski ravni na področju pravosodja, zlasti z oblikovanjem evropskega portala,
whereas the Council decided in 2007 to start work on the development at European level of the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in the justice field, particularly by creating a European portal,
ker se ocenjuje, da je približno 10 milijonov ljudi udeleženih v čezmejne sodne spore v Evropi, zaradi česar je večja raba informacijske tehnologije bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje boljšega dostopa državljanov do sodstva in za to, da se racionalizira in poenostavi sodne postopke ter skrajša procesne roke in zmanjša operativne stroške v čezmejnih sodnih sporih,
whereas, with some 10 million people estimated to be involved in cross-border litigation in Europe, greater recourse to information technology (IT) is essential in order to ensure better access to justice for citizens and with a view to rationalising and simplifying judicial proceedings and reducing procedural deadlines and operating costs in cross-border litigation,
ker je e-pravosodje širok pojem in zajema splošno uporabo elektronskih tehnologij, ki se uporabljajo v pravosodju, in ker ta pojem vključuje številne vidike, ki niso nujno povezani s pojmom e-pravosodja, kot si ga razlagata Komisija v zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu z dne 30. maja 2008 in delovna skupina Sveta, ki se ukvarja z e-pravosodjem,
whereas e-Justice has a broad definition including, in general, the use of electronic technologies in the field of justice, and whereas this definition covers a number of issues which are not necessarily linked to the concept of e-Justice as interpreted by the Commission in its above-mentioned communication of 30 May 2008 and by the Council's Working Party on e-Justice,
ker lahko informacijska tehnologija, če se pravilno uporablja, znatno prispeva k izboljšanju dostopnosti in učinkovitosti sodnih in pravnih sistemov v Evropi; ker bodo z vedno bolj povezanim notranjim trgom in rastočo mobilnostjo znotraj Evrope izzivi, s katerimi se sam po sebi sooča čezmejni sodni sistem, kot na primer jezik, razdalje in nepoznani pravni sistemi, verjetno postali bolj vsakodnevni; ker je te težave vseeno mogoče v določeni meri ublažiti z ustrezno uporabo informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije, s čimer se ne izboljša zgolj dostopnost sodstva za evropske državljane, temveč to prispeva tudi k učinkovitosti enotnega trga,
whereas, if it is applied properly, IT can make a significant contribution to improving the accessibility and efficiency of Europe's judicial and legal systems; whereas, with an increasingly integrated internal market and growing mobility within Europe, the challenges inherently faced by a cross-border judicial system, such as language, distance and unfamiliar legal systems, are likely to become more common; whereas these problems can, however, be eased to some extent through the appropriate application of ICT, thus not only improving access to justice for Europe's citizens but also contributing to the efficiency of the single market,
ker je v poročilu Komisije Sveta Evrope za učinkovitost pravosodja o uporabi informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij v evropskih pravosodnih sistemih poudarjeno, da uporaba elektronskih tehnologij v sodstvu nima vedno pozitivnega učinka in da je treba za doseganje dobrih rezultatov dejavnosti izvajati na institucionalni in strateški ravni,
whereas, as stressed in the CEPEJ report on the use of ICT in European judicial systems, the application of electronic technologies to justice does not always have a positive effect and, in order to obtain good results, the action must be carried out in an institutional and strategic way,