natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
AZ. ker svetovno prebivalstvo narašča, zaradi česar je moč pričakovati, da se bo skupna poraba bistveno povečala, kar še povečuje pritisk na ravnanje z odpadki; ker bi reševanje teh težav med drugim zahtevalo tudi večjo ozaveščenost in izvajanje načela hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki;
AZ. whereas the world population is growing and therefore the total consumption is expected to increase significantly, which puts more pressure on waste management; whereas the solution to this problem would require, among other things, an increased awareness and implementation of the waste hierarchy principle;
2. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja prenos direktive EU o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja v zakonodaje držav članic, da bo pravočasen in učinkovit;
Calls on the Commission to carefully monitor the transposition by the Member States of the EU directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law, to ensure that it is done promptly and effectively;
6. poziva Komisijo k oblikovanju posebnih smernic, ki bi pristojnim organom pomagale pri pravilnem izvajanju pravnega reda na področju odpadkov, vendar opozarja, da so viri, ki so na voljo na evropski ravni, aktualno neustrezni; zato meni, da je treba sprejeti dopolnilne finančne in upravne ukrepe za zagotavljanje večjih zmogljivosti za usmerjanje in usposabljanje uradnikov, zaposlenih v sektorju odpadkov;
Calls on the Commission for more specific guidance to be provided for competent authorities in order to assist them with the correct implementation of the waste acquis but notes that the resources available at European level are currently inadequate; considers, therefore, that complementary financial and administrative measures should be taken to provide better guidance and training facilities for officials working in the waste sector;
8. meni, da vzpostavitev nove agencije EU za ravnanje z odpadki ni zaželena in da je obstoječa institucionalna struktura na ravni EU – ki temelji na Generalnemu direktoratu Komisije za okolje in Evropski agenciji za okolje kot središču strokovnega znanja in odličnosti – stroškovno učinkovitejša, čeprav jo je treba dodatno okrepiti, da bo dejavneje nadzorovala in skrbela za izvrševanje zakonodaje;
Believes that the establishment of a new EU Agency for waste management is not desirable and considers that the present institutional structure at EU level – based upon the Commission’s DG Environment and the European Environment Agency as a centre of expertise and excellence – is more cost-effective, although these must be further reinforced in order to provide more active oversight and enforcement;
13. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v tem okviru spodbujajo večjo okoljsko ozaveščenost prebivalstva o prednostih učinkovitega ravnanja z odpadki, zlasti z informiranjem o predhostih predhodnega ločevanja odpadkov in dejanskih stroških zbiranja gospodinjskih odpadkov, pa tudi o finančnih koristih, ki jih prinaša predelava gospodinjskih odpadkov;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to promote, in this context, greater environmental awareness among the population about the advantages of efficient waste management, notably by advising them of the merits of pre-sorting waste and the real cost of collecting household waste, as well as of the financial gain obtained from recovering this household waste;
17. poudarja temeljni pomen pravilnega in popolnega izvajanja direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje ter ustreznega usklajevanja postopkov izdaje dovoljenj, ki izhajajo iz okoljske zakonodaje;
Emphasises the fundamental importance of the correct and full implementation of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive and proper coordination of the permitting procedures required under environmental legislation;
20. je prepričan, da je treba izboljšati dialog med javnimi organi, zasebnimi izvajalci in prizadetim prebivalstvom ter da morajo imeti državljani boljši dostop do objektivnih informacij, po potrebi pa morajo biti na voljo tudi bolj učinkovite mehanizme za upravno in sodno presojo;
Is convinced that dialogue between public authorities, private-sector operators and affected populations must be improved and that citizens must have better access to objective information, with more effective mechanisms for administrative and judicial reviews where these are necessary;
23. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga jasnejša in bolj natančna merila za izbiro lokacije odlagališč v povezavi z bližino lokalnih hiš, šol in zdravstvenih ustanov, da bi zagotovila trdnejša jamstva zoper morebitne nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi in okolja, pri čemer ne gre pozabiti, da je treba upoštevati številne spremenljivke in lokalne značilnosti ter v celoti spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti;
Urges the Commission to propose clearer and more specific criteria for the location of landfills in relation to local housing, schools or health facilities in order to ensure more robust guarantees against potential risks to human health and the environment, bearing in mind that there are a large number of variables and local considerations that need to be taken into account. with full respect for the subsidiarity principle;
26. spodbuja Komisijo, naj, kadar je za to pristojna, zagotovi skladnost s postopkovnimi zahtevami, ki izhajajo iz prava EU (presoja vplivov na okolje, javna posvetovanja), vključno z zahtevami, ki jih določajo direktive za varovanje narave in območij zgodovinske dediščine;
Encourages the Commission, where it is the competent authority, to ensure compliance with procedural requirements under EU law (Environmental Impact Assessment, public consultation), including requirements under the Directives for the protection of nature and historical heritage sites;
29. meni, da je treba večji poudarek nameniti predelavi organskih odpadkov, zlasti v pretežno kmetijskih regijah, saj se temu področju do sedaj ni namenjalo ustrezne pozornosti;
Considers that more emphasis must be placed on the recovery of organic waste, especially in broadly agricultural regions, something which seems to have received little attention so far;
34. priporoča uvedbo sorazmernih in odvračilnih glob in kazni za nezakonito odlaganje odpadkov, zlasti strupenih in nevarnih odpadkov, s katerimi bi, skladno z načelom onesnaževalec plača, deloma nadomestili okoljsko škodo; meni, da bi bilo treba nezakonito odlaganje močno onesnaženih kemičnih ali radioaktivnih odpadkov na podeželju kaznovati z izredno strogimi kaznimi, sorazmernimi z nevarnostmi, ki jih ima takšno ravnanje za ljudi in okolje;
Recommends the imposition of adequate and dissuasive fines and penalties for the illegal disposal of waste, especially toxic and hazardous waste, partly to compensate for environmental damage in accordance with the polluter-pays principle; believes that illegal dumping in the countryside of highly contaminated chemical or radioactive waste should be punished with very severe sentences commensurate with the dangers this practice poses for people and the environment;
36. priporoča, naj lokalni in /ali nacionalni organi vzpostavijo učinkovit finančni nadzor zasebnih podjetij, ki so prejela javni denar za upravljanje obdelave odpadkov, glede uporabe teh sredstev, da bi zagotovili pravno skladnost s predpisi EU;
Recommends that, if public funds are allocated to private enterprises to manage waste processing, effective financial monitoring over the use of these funds should be put in place by local and/or national authorities to guarantee legal compliance with EU rules;
Večina evropskih državljanov pričakuje od javnih organov učinkovite in uspešne javne storitve na področju zdravja, izobraževanja, prometa in varnosti.
Most European citizens expect public authorities to provide efficient and effective public services in terms of health, education, transport and security.
Kljub temu pa dozdevna nesposobnost javnih organov številnih držav za zadovoljivo spopadanje s težavami glede ravnanja z odpadki sproža vedno večje število peticij.
However, one issue that provokes a growing number of petitions is the apparent inability of public authorities in many countries to deal satisfactorily with the problem of waste management.
Evropska unija je sprejela širok nabor zakonodaje, ki velja v vseh državah članicah, s katero je želela zagotoviti obstoj pravnega okvira za soočanje z neizogibnim rezultatom našega sodobnega življenjskega sloga, in sicer z vsemi stvarmi in predmeti, ki jih odvržemo v gospodinjstvih, na delovnem mestu, v bolnišnicah, industrijskih obratih itn.
The European Union has adopted a broad raft of legislation, applicable in all Member States, in order to ensure that the legal framework exists to deal with the inevitable result of our modern life-style, in terms of all the things we discard as waste, from our household, from our place of work, from our hospitals, from our industries and so on.
Jasno je, da neuspehi pri reševanju tovrstnih vprašanj, pa tudi neuspehi pri prednostni obravnavi prizadevanj na tem področju, prispevajo ne le k negativnim vplivom na zdravje in dobro počutje ljudi, ampak tudi k preživetju našega planeta in okolja v širšem smislu.
It is obvious to all that failure to manage such issues, and failure to prioritise efforts in this respect, produces not only negative effects on human health and well-being, but also on the viability of the planet and its environment in the broadest sense.
Glede na prejete peticije je mogoče sklepati, da se pomisleki številnih lokalnih skupnosti povečujejo, to pa kaže na to, da postaja ravnanje z odpadki eden od pomembnejših političnih in družbenih problemov, in da ljudje pričakujejo, da se bo Evropska unija, ki sprejema zakonodajo na tem področju, z njim spopadla.
Judging by the petitions received, the concern of many local communities is growing and this indicates that waste management is becoming a major political and social problem and people expect the European Union, which adopts such legislation, to deal with it.
Verodostojnost zakonodaje EU se je tako znašla pred pomembno preizkušnjo
Indeed, it is the credibility of EU legislation which is at stake.
Glej delovni dokument z naslovom „Vprašanja vlagateljev peticij glede izvajanja direktive za ravnanje z odpadki in z njo povezanih direktiv v državah članicah Evropske unije“, DDT867298. .
See Working Document on ‘The issues raised by petitioners in relation to the application of the Waste Management Directive, and related directives, in the Member States of the European Union’, DT867298.
Za industrijo odpadkov je v Evropski uniji pristojen javni sektor, vendar pa jo pogosto upravljajo zasebni interesi in multinacionalke, ki obdelajo 60 % gospodinjskih odpadkov in 75 % odpadkov, ki jih proizvedejo podjetja, in letno ustvarijo več kot 75 milijard EUR prometa
The waste industry in the European Union is a public responsibility, frequently managed by private interests and multinational companies, who deal with 60% of household waste and 75% of waste from businesses, with an annual turnover in excess of 75 billion euros.
„Bruseljska deklaracija“ Evropske zveze služb za ravnanje z odpadki in okolje (FEAD), 15. februar 2011. .
FEAD ‘Brussels Declaration’ 15 February 2011.
Največji izmed teh gospodarskih družb, Onyx (Veolia) in Sita (Suez), sta prisotni v dveh tretjinah držav članic EU, vsaka družba pa zaposluje več kot 50.000 ljudi.
The largest of these companies Onyx (Veolia) and Sita (Suez) are present in 2/3rds of the EU Member States employing more than 50,000 people in each case.
Omenjeni družbi, pa tudi številne druge, kot sta Remondis in FCC, spadata med izkušena in strokovno podkovana podjetja, ki se zavzemajo, da bi pri izvajanju svojih najpomembnejših nalog na področju upravljanja cikla odpadkov vzpostavila in ohranila svoj strokovni ugled.
These, and the many other companies such as Remondis and FCC, are experienced and professional businesses which have an interest in establishing and maintaining a good professional reputation for their key responsibilities in the management of the waste cycle.
Odpadki tako ne predstavljajo zgolj javne storitve, ampak tudi dobičkonosno gospodarsko panogo, politične oblasti pa so v tem okviru dolžne zagotoviti ustrezen nadzor ter dosledno izvajanje zakonov in predpisov na področju cikla odpadkov.
Waste is therefore not only a public service but a profitable industry and in this context the political authorities have a duty to ensure proper supervision and the strict application of the laws and regulations of the waste cycle.
Analiza politik za ravnanje z odpadki, ki se izvajajo v državah članicah EU, nudi precej nasprotujoče si informacije.
An analysis of the waste management policies implemented in the Member States of the EU provides very contrasting information.
Peščica držav članic, vključno z Dansko, Nizozemsko, Avstrijo in Švedsko, je zelo naprednih; državljani teh držav namreč niso predložili nobene peticije, v kateri bi izrazili kakršne koli pomisleke glede ravnanja z odpadki.
A handful of Member States, including Denmark, Netherlands, Austria and Sweden are very advanced; indeed no petitions have been received from citizens in these countries expressing any concern about waste management.
Vendar pa številne druge države EU močno zaostajajo z izvajanjem svojih strategij za ravnanje z odpadki, pri čemer sta zapuščina preteklosti in pretirana odvisnost od odlagališč v povezavi s potrebo po spremembi odnosa do odstranjevanja odpadkov
However, many other EU countries are far behind in their implementation of waste strategies and in this context the legacy of the past, and an excessive dependence on landfill options, linked to the need to change attitudes towards waste disposal
Izraz „kultura odpadkov“ (waste culture) se nanaša na potrebo po usposabljanju državljanov o razlikah med različnimi vrstami gospodinjskih odpadkov in na z njimi povezane zahteve, ki izhajajo iz „hierarhije odpadkov“ (waste hiearchy), in sicer preprečevanje, ločevanje in recikliranje – tovrstne nujne zahteve bi morale v vsakem gospodinjstvu postati nekaj povsem običajnega. privedli do hudih kršitev zakonodaje EU.
‘Waste culture’ is a term employed to indicate the need to educate citizens about how to differentiate between different types of household waste and the corresponding requirements of the ‘Waste hierarchy’, notably prevention, selection and recycling - such imperative requirements should become natural in every household. has caused serious breaches of EU legislation to occur.
„Hierarhija odpadkov“ vzpostavlja prednostno obravnavo za preprečevanje nastanka odpadkov in ravnanje z njimi, člen 4 okvirne direktive o odpadkih pa v nasprotju s predhodno direktivo kot nujno opredeljuje: preprečevanje, pripravo za ponovno uporabo, recikliranje, druge oblike predelave – vključno s pridobivanjem energije – in odstranjevanje odpadkov s pomočjo varnega sežiganja, pri čemer odlaganje na odlagališčih predstavlja zadnjo možnost.
The ‘waste hierarchy’ establishes a prioritisation for waste prevention and management and, in contrast to the former Directive, in article 4 of the new WFD it becomes imperative: prevention, preparation for re-use, recycling, other recovery - including energy recovery, and disposal by means of safe incineration, with landfill as the very last resort.
Druge države članice pa se na tovrstne izgovore ne morejo več zanašati.
Other Member States have no such excuses.
Komisija je januarja 2011 objavila, da je od izteka roka za uveljavitev direktive o odlagališčih leta 2001 v 177 primerih sprožila postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev v zvezi z odlagališči.
The Commission reported in January 2011 that 177 infringement cases concerning landfills had been launched since the deadline for implementing the Landfill Directive in 2001.
Pri Komisiji so tudi izračunali, da je v EU še vedno v uporabi najmanj 619 nezakonitih odlagališč.
They had furthermore calculated that there were at the very least 619 illegal landfills still being used in the EU.
Tem je treba dodati še približno 1.000 odlagališč, ki ne dosegajo standardov in ki jih je treba čim prej bodisi posodobiti bodisi zapreti – v obdobju od 2004 do 2006 je bilo zaprtih okrog 3.300 odlagališč.
Added to this are about 1000 substandard landfills which are either to be upgraded or closed as soon as possible - some 3,300 landfills were closed between 2004 and 2006.
V svojem strateškem poročilu o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov je Komisija jasno nakazala, da si po svojih najboljših močeh prizadeva za reševanje vprašanja ravnanja z odpadki
In its strategic report on the prevention and recycling of waste the Commission clearly demonstrates that it is using its best efforts to address the issue of waste management.
Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o tematski strategiji o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov.
Report from the Commission to the EP, Council, EESC and CoR on the Thematic Strategy on the Prevention and Recycling of Waste.
KOM(2011)13 konč. .
COM(2011) 13 Final.
V njem je orisala tudi svoje srednjeročne predloge in predlagala t.i. „koncept življenjskega cikla“ v politiki za ravnanje z odpadki.
It outlines its medium term proposals and suggests introducing what it calls ‘life-cycle thinking’ in waste policy.
Kljub temu pa se ni odločila, da bi v poročilu poimensko navedla in osramotila tiste države članice, ki veljavne direktive ne izvajajo, niti da bi preučila vse trdovratne težave, ki so se pojavile v preteklih letih in ki še vedno obstajajo.
There is however, no attempt in the report to name or shame Member States which are not applying existing Directives, nor does it look at the sorts of persistent problems which have arisen over the years and which remain.
V tem okviru je treba opozoriti, da je cilj velikega števila omenjenih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev zagotoviti pravno skladnost, medtem ko predlagatelji peticij menijo, da si je treba v večji meri prizadevati za zagotavljanje ustreznih ukrepov za nadaljnje spremljanje izvajanja zakonodaje v praksi.
It should be recalled in this context that the large number of infringement cases mentioned aim at ensuring legal compliance, yet from the petitioners’ perspective more efforts need to be made to ensure proper follow-up actions in the actual implementation of the law.
In prav na tem področju je izvrševanje zakonodaje v državah članicah bistvenega pomena.
This is where Member State enforcement becomes a critical factor.
To je tudi področje, za katerega Komisija priznava, da bi bilo treba storiti še več, in kjer predlaga proaktivni postopek preverjanja v povezavi s sistemom zgodnjega opozarjanja glede skladnosti.
This is also where the Commission recognises more needs to be done, and it raises the prospect of a more pro-active verification procedure combined with an early-warning system on compliance.
Kljub temu pa poročevalec meni, da to ne nudi ustreznih možnosti za nujno reševanje številnih utemeljenih primerov, ki so jih predlagatelji peticij predstavili Odboru.
However again, your rapporteur is of the opinion that this does not address adequately the urgency of the many justified cases brought by petitioners to the attention of the Committee.
S procesom ravnanja z odpadki so, čeprav zadevajo predhodne faze tega procesa, tesno povezane direktive EU, ki urejajo presojo vplivov na okolje in dostop državljanov do informacij, povezanih z okoljem.
Closely linked to the waste management process, although upstream of the process, are the EU Directives dealing with Environmental Impact Assessment and the access of citizens to information concerning the environment.
Vse države članice EU ter njihovi regionalni in občinski organi morajo ne glede na to, ali se pripravljajo načrti za sežigalnice, obrate za metanizacijo ali odlagališča, spoštovati postopke EU, ki jih določajo te direktive.
Whether plans are being prepared for incinerator plants, methanisation plants or landfill facilities, EU procedures as established through these Directives must be respected by all Member States and their regions and municipal authorities.
Na podlagi informacij, prejetih s strani predlagateljev peticij, se zdi, da v številnih državah članicah obstajajo hude pomanjkljivosti glede spoštovanja ciljev, ki jih vsebujejo te direktive, za katere se zdi, da se pogosto napačno ali pa sploh ne razlagajo.
From the information received from petitioners there appears to be serious shortcomings regarding the due respect by several Member States for the objectives contained in these Directives which appear to be often inexactly interpreted, if at all.
V objavljenih rezultatih javnega posvetovanja o direktivi o presoji vplivov na okolje Komisija ugotavlja, da je 56 % vprašanih menilo, da bi bilo treba proces izboljšati, s čimer bi zagotovili učinkovitejše varstvo okolja, medtem ko bistvene spremembe niso potrebne.
Publishing the results of a public consultation on the EIA Directive, the Commission notes that 56% of respondents felt the process should be improved to ensure more effective environmental protection, although not radically changed.
Ena izmed možnosti, ki bi jih bilo treba preučiti, so tudi natančnejše smernice ter izboljšano spremljanje in povečanje sinergij z drugimi direktivami EU, vključno z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih.
More specific guidelines were one option to be considered, as well as an improvement in monitoring and better synergies with other EU Directives, including the WFD.
Odbor za peticije je v zadnjih letih izvedel številne misije, ki so njegovim članom omogočile neposredno pridobivanje informacij od zainteresiranih strani o težavah, s katerimi se soočajo lokalne skupnosti na področju odpadkov.
Of course, in recent years the Petitions Committee has conducted a number of missions which have allowed its members to obtain first-hand information from interested parties on the problems faced by local communities on the waste issue.
Obisk na Irskem leta 2007 je Odboru omogočil preučevanje učinkov velike količine industrijskih odpadkov iz tovarne aluminija na bregu reke Shannon v kraju Aughinish (podobnim tveganjem smo bili kasneje priča na Madžarskem, ko je prišlo do izlitja iz bazenov, ki so vsebovali enak strupen mulj rdeče barve, kar je privedlo do smrtnih žrtev in opustošenja vaške skupnosti), težav, povezanih s sežigalnico na polotoku Poolbeg v Dublinu, obdelave odpadne vode v mestih Kilkenny in Galway ter v kraju Ringsend in izgradnje odlagališča v kraju Nevitt v okrožju Lusk.
A visit to Ireland in 2007 enabled the Committee to investigate the impact of large scale industrial waste from an aluminium plant on the banks of the Shannon at Aughinish, (similar risks to those later witnessed in Hungary when ponds containing the same red toxic sludge were breached leading to several deaths and the devastation of a village community) the problems related to the site of an incinerator on the Poolbeg Peninsular in Dublin, on Waste water treatment in Kilkenny and Galway as well as in Ringsend, and on the development of a landfill in Nevitt Lusk.
Ob obisku velikega odlagališča v bližini Marseilla leta 2008 so se člani po eni strani imeli priložnost seznaniti z dejstvom, da je to odlagališče skoraj v celoti zasičeno (čeprav je dobro upravljano), po drugi strani pa izgradnja sežigalnice v kraju Fos-sur-Mer, ki so jo predlagatelji peticije in lokalni organi močno kritizirali, še naprej ostaja sporna in poraja resne pomisleke glede njenih učinkov na zdravje lokalnega prebivalstva.
Visiting the huge landfill facility near Marseilles, in 2008, members were able to observe on the one hand the fact that the facility itself was near saturation (though well-managed) but the development of the incinerator plant at Fos-sur-Mer, strongly criticised by the petitioners and local authorities, remains deeply controversial with serious concerns about its impact on the health of the local population.
V Združenem kraljestvu je Odbor obiskal sežigalnico Carntyne v Glasgowu, glede katere je bil zelo kritičen, saj se ta nahaja na revnem urbanem območju, ki je bilo izpostavljeno smradu in onesnaženju zaradi sežiganja govedi v krizi, ki je nastopila po odkritju BSE.
In the United Kingdom, the Committee had visited the Carntyne Incinerator plant in Glasgow about which it was strongly critical, situated as it was in a poor urban area which was exposed to the stench and pollution from cattle incineration following the BSE crisis.