natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je sedanji pravni red EU o varstvu potrošnikov razdrobljen: v skladu z razdelitvijo pristojnosti v pogodbah je EU le za določene sektorje in storitve določila jasna pravila, kot so pogodbe pri prodaji na daljavo, nepoštena poslovna praksa, potrošniški krediti, organizirane počitnice in časovni zakupi,
whereas the current EU consumer acquis is fragmented: in line with the allocation of competence in the Treaties, the EU has laid down clear rules only in certain sectors or services, such as distance contracts, unfair commercial practices, consumer credit, package holidays and timeshares,
ker obstajajo dokazi, da lahko sedanja razdrobljenost zakonodajnega okvira odvrača potrošnike od opravljanja čezmejnih transakcij ter da lahko povzroča nedobrodošle možnosti za čezmejne goljufije in daje priložnosti goljufom,
whereas there is evidence to suggest that the current fragmentation of the legislative framework may act as a deterrent to engagement in cross-border transactions on the part of consumers and that that fragmentation could provide unwelcome opportunities for cross-border scams and fraudsters,
ker zelena knjiga o pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov ne obravnava obveznosti ponudnikov storitev,
whereas the Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis does not address the obligations of service providers,
ker niti potrošniki niti ponudniki storitev ne morejo vedno jasno opredeliti, kateri pravni okvir se uporablja za posamezen vidik njihovih dejavnosti oziroma ali se uporablja pravo države gostiteljice ali matične države ali se uporablja regulativni okvir države gostiteljice ali matične države,
whereas neither the consumer nor the service provider are always able to determine with clarity which legal regime is applicable to each aspect of their activities, that is to say, whether the law of the host or home country applies or whether the regulatory regime of the host or home country applies,
ker so v nekaterih državah članicah uporabniki storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo zasebni subjekti, bolje zavarovani kot uporabniki storitev, ki jih opravljajo javni subjekti,
whereas, in some Member States, users of services provided by private entities are better protected than users of services provided by public entities,
ker obstoječa zakonodaja praviloma ne obravnava dejanskih obveznosti s strani ponudnika storitev in potrošnikom ne zagotavlja posebnih pravnih sredstev, v nasprotju z ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti v zvezi s prostim pretokom blaga,
whereas existing legislation does not, as a rule, address the substantive obligations of service providers, nor does it provide specific remedies for the consumer, in contrast to measures that have been adopted concerning the free movement of goods,
ker pomanjkanje pravne strukture na ravni Skupnosti, ki bi potrošnikom omogočala čezmejno kolektivno ukrepanje proti goljufom in slabim ponudnikom storitev, predstavlja vrzel v zakonodajnem okviru in še pomembneje oviro za potrošnike pri čezmejnem pridobivanju stroškovno učinkovitih pravnih sredstev in odškodnin,
whereas the lack of any legal structure at Community level allowing consumers to take collective action on a cross-border basis against fraudsters and deficient service providers constitutes both a gap in the regulatory regime and more importantly a barrier to consumers obtaining cost-effective legal redress and compensation cross-border,
ker v nekaterih državah članicah noben organ ni pristojen za pomoč pri izvensodnih poravnavah sporov, obstoječe strukture na ravni Skupnosti, zlasti ECC-Net (Mreža evropskih centrov za potrošnike) in FIN-NET (Čezmejna mreža za izvensodno reševanje sporov v sektorju finančnih storitev v Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru), pa niso dovolj prepoznavne, poleg tega pa nimajo dovolj sredstev,
whereas, in some Member States, there is no body competent to assist in out-of-court dispute resolution and existing structures at Community level, namely the ECC-Net (European Consumer Centres Network) and FIN-NET (Cross-Border Out-of-Court Complaints Network for Financial Services in the European Economic Area), are both insufficiently well-known and under resourced,
spodbuja razvoj ukrepov, ki dokončno vzpostavljajo notranji trg za storitve;
Encourages the development of measures that will complete the internal market for services;
prepričan je, da je za ponudnike storitev potreben enotnejši sistem obveznosti, saj postaja trg storitev vedno bolj čezmejen z namenom, da se še naprej omogoča razvoj brezhibnega notranjega trga storitev;
Is convinced that a more uniform system of obligations for service providers is needed as the market in services becomes increasingly cross-border in order further to facilitate the development of a seamless internal market for services;
se zaveda, da mora imeti Direktiva o storitvah, da bo prenesena v nacionalno pravo vseh držav članic do 28. decembra 2009, močan vpliv na zagotavljanje čezmejnih storitev, vendar ugotavlja, da se direktiva ne nanaša na bistvene obveznosti ponudnikov storitev;
Is aware that the Services Directive, to be transposed into national law in all Member States by 28 December 2009, should have a considerable impact on the cross-border provision of services, but notes that the Directive does not address the substantive obligations of service providers;
meni, da bo razjasnjevanje pravnega sistema o obveznostih ponudnikov storitev v EU povečalo konkurenčnost in izbiro za potrošnike, istočasno pa ne sme omogočiti neupravičene ovire za prosti pretok storitev na notranjem trgu;
Believes that clarifying the legal system of obligations of service providers in the EU will bring more competition as well as greater choice for consumers and at the same time should not create unjustified obstacles to the free movement of services in the internal market;
meni, da povzročajo različni zakoni in drugi predpisi v državah članicah negotovost in pomanjkanje preglednosti tako za ponudnike storitev kakor tudi za potrošnike in otežujejo uporabo skupnih virov EU, kljub temu pa omogočajo konkurenčnost v zaščiti potrošnikov;
Believes that the different laws, regulations and administrative practices in the Member States cause uncertainty and lack of transparency for both service providers and consumers and make the use of the EU's common resources more difficult, but also provide an opportunity for competition in consumer protection;
obžaluje, da zaradi mešanice pravnih instrumentov, ki vključuje kolizijska pravila in instrumente notranjega trga, ni mogoče natančno določiti njihovega vzajemnega delovanja, kar pomeni, da niti potrošniki niti ponudniki storitev ne morejo vedno jasno opredeliti, kateri pravni okvir se uporablja za posamezen vidik njihovih dejavnosti oziroma ali velja pravo države gostiteljice ali matične države ali regulativni okvir države gostiteljice ali matične države;
Regrets that the present mix of legislative instruments between rules on conflict of law and internal market instruments and the failure clearly to determine their interaction mean that neither the consumer nor the service provider is always able to know with clarity which legal regime is applicable to each aspect of their activities, that is to say, whether the law of the host or home country applies or whether the regulatory regime of the host or home country applies;
je prepričan, da skušajo potrošniki ob občutku negotovosti glede varnosti in kakovosti storitev, miselne ovire postaviti pred tuje dobavitelje, kar jih odvrača od uporabe čezmejnih storitev in da potrošnik takrat, ko doživi negativno izkušnjo, le-to pogosto nepravično prenese na vse tuje ponudnike storitev;
Is convinced that when consumers feel uncertain about the safety and quality of a service, they tend to erect mental barriers to foreign suppliers, which deters them from making use of cross-border services, and that when a consumer has a negative experience, it frequently is made to reflect unfairly on all foreign service providers;
poudarja, da kupci v primeru opravljanja storitev v okviru zakonodaje Skupnosti niso tako dobro zaščiteni kot kupci blaga;
Points out that when it comes to the performance of a service, consumers are not as well protected under the Community acquis as consumers who purchase goods;
izraža zadržke, vendar se pripravlja na popolno izvajanje Direktive o storitvah, kar zadeva daljnosežne, nove horizontalne instrumente za oblikovanje notranjega trga za storitve;
Expresses its reservations, nonetheless, pending full implementation of the Services Directive, as regards far-reaching new horizontal tools for the completion of the internal market for services;
meni, da so storitve pogosto zapletene strukture, ki vključujejo izmenjavo človeških virov in izbiro;
Is aware that services are often complex structures involving human interaction and choice;
je prepričan, da imajo lahko ne le potrošniki, temveč tudi in zlasti mala in srednje velika podjetja, tako v vlogi kupcev pa tudi prodajalcev čezmejnih storitev, koristi od dodatne pravne jasnosti, enostavnosti in znižanja stroškov;
Is convinced that not only consumers, but also and in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), could, both as buyers and sellers of cross-border services, benefit from additional legal certainty, simplicity and a reduction in costs;
ponovno poudarja Splošni sporazum o trgovini s storitvami, ki navaja, da se čezmejne storitve izvajajo na različne načine (spletna trgovina, potovanje v drugo državo zaradi storitve ali potovanje ponudnika storitve v matično državo potrošnika), ki jih je treba upoštevati;
Recalls that, as stated in the General Agreement on Trade in Services, cross-border services are provided in many different ways (such as selling online, travelling to another country for the service, or through a visit by the service provider to the consumer's home country), which should be taken into consideration;
ugotavlja, da je v pripravi več zakonodajnih pobud o zagotavljanju pravne varnosti, kar zadeva pravice in zlasti obveznosti ponudnikov čezmejnih storitev, in sicer predlog uredbe o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti (Rim I) ( KOM(2005)0650 ), Uredbe (ES) št. 864/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti (Rim II) UL L199, 31.7.2007, str.
Notes that there are several pending legislative initiatives aimed at ensuring legal certainty as regards the rights and especially the obligations of cross-border service providers, namely the proposal for a regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) ( COM(2005)0650 ), Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
in zelena knjiga Komisije o pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov;
and the Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis;
poudarja, da je člen 5 predloga Rim I ključen za določanje, ali velja zakonodaja o varstvu potrošnikov države izvora (ponudnika storitev) ali države stranke (potrošnika storitve); poudarja, da je treba počakati na izid tega zakonodajnega postopka;
Points out that Article 5 of the Rome I proposal is essential in order to determine whether the consumer protection legislation of the country of origin (of the service provider) or of the client (consumer of the service) applies; stresses that it is important to await the outcome of this legislative procedure;
je prepričan, da je vzpostavitev notranjega trga za storitve, za katerega zakonski okvir temelji na temeljnih svoboščinah ustanavljanja in zagotavljanju storitev, kakor je določeno v Pogodbi in opredeljeno v Direktivi o storitvah, odvisna od ustreznih ukrepov tako s pravnega kot tudi praktičnega vidika;
Is convinced that the establishment of an internal market for services, the legal framework for which is based on the fundamental freedoms of establishment and to provide services, as set out in the EC Treaty and as defined in the Services Directive, depends on the relevant measures being clear from both a legal and a practical perspective;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri obveznostih izvajalcev storitev upošteva, da se ne razlikuje med javnimi in zasebnimi izvajalci storitev, ki bi morali biti enako predmet področja uporabe direktiv o varstvu potrošnikov;
Calls on the Commission to bear in mind that, when it comes to the obligations of services providers, no difference should be made between public and private service providers, which should both be equally subject to the application of the directives on consumer protection;
priznava, da ima lahko obstoječa zakonodaja EU, tako kot ta direktiva o storitvah in direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah Direktiva 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu (direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah) (UL L 149, 11.6.2005, str.
Recognises that, even though existing legislation in the EU, such as the Services Directive and the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market (Unfair Commercial Practices Directive) (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p.
, posredni vpliv na nacionalno zakonodajo na tem področju, čeprav ne vsebujejo nikakršnih posebnih določb, ki so namenjene urejanju čezmejnih odgovornosti ponudnikov storitev;
, does not contain any specific provisions aimed at regulating the cross-border liability of service providers, it may have an indirect effect on national legislation in this field;
poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno nadzoruje prenos in izvajanje obstoječe in prihodnje horizontalne in sektorske zakonodaje, ki je povezana z odgovornostjo čezmejnih izvajalcev storitev;
Calls on the Commission to monitor thoroughly the transposition and implementation of existing and forthcoming horizontal and sectoral legislation relating to the liability of cross-border service providers;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči ukrepe kot je uvedba standardov na ravni EU, kot sredstvo za spodbujanje varnosti storitev in zagotavljanje pravic potrošnikov, ki so povezani s čezmejnimi storitvami, ki jih ponujajo države članice;
Calls on the Commission to examine measures, such as the introduction of standards at EU level, for promoting the safety of services and for guaranteeing consumers' rights in the field of cross-border services provided by Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej razvija, namenja sredstva in spodbuja delo mrež evropskih centrov za potrošnike in omrežja FIN-NET, ter naj v primeru, da alternativni sistemi za reševanje sporov še naprej ne bodo na voljo v ključnih storitvenih sektorjih v državah članicah, premisli vsaj o priporočilu za to zadevo;
Calls on the Commission further to develop, resource and promote the work of the ECC-Net and of FIN-NET and, in the event that alternative dispute resolution systems remain unavailable in key service sectors in Members States, to consider at least a recommendation on that subject;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej dejavno preučuje uvedbo pravnega instrumenta na ravni Skupnosti, da bi olajšali čezmejno kolektivno ukrepanje potrošnikov, da bi omogočili večji dostop do pravnih sredstev;
Calls on the Commission to continue active consideration of the introduction of a legal instrument at Community level to facilitate collective action by consumers on a cross-border basis so as to allow greater access to legal redress;
priznava, da v vseh državah članicah obstajajo režimi odgovornosti za ponudnike storitev, pa čeprav na različnih stopnjah, vendar verjame, da je zaradi jasnosti in ustvarjanja zaupanja potrošnikov nujno vsaj nekaj konvergence, zlasti v ključnih čezmejnih sektorjih; meni tudi, da, kjer je to ustrezno, obstaja potreba po tesnejšem sodelovanju med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in poklicnimi organizacijami;
Recognises that liability regimes for service providers exist, albeit to varying degrees, in all Member States, but believes that in the interests of clarity and so as to create consumer confidence there needs to be some convergence, especially in key cross-border sectors; believes also that there is a need for greater co-operation between national regulatory bodies and professional organisations, where appropriate;
Zahteva za predlog horizontalnega instrumenta o obveznostih ponudnikov storitev
Request for a proposal for a horizontal instrument on the obligations of service providers
poziva Komisijo, naj, medtem ko nadaljuje delo na sektorski podlagi na ključnih področjih, v 12 mesecih predloži delovni program za primerno presojo vpliva obstoječe in prihodnje zakonodaje na notranjem trgu o ponudnikih čezmejnih storitev in potrebe po morebitnih obširnih horizontalnih instrumentih, ki bodo uskladili pravila ponudbe čezmejnih storitev, da se omogoči visoko raven varstva potrošnikov;
Calls on the Commission, whilst continuing work on a sectoral basis in key areas, to submit, within 12 months, a work programme for an appropriate assessment of the impact of existing and forthcoming legislation in the internal market on the obligations of cross-border service providers and of the need for a possible broad horizontal instrument to align the rules on cross-border service provision in order to provide a high level of consumer protection;
meni, da bi morala taka presoja preveriti morebiten obširni instrument, ki bi moral vsebovati vsaj osnovna splošna pravila, ki zahtevajo primerne informacije o cenah, pogodbenih pogojih in sredstva v primeru nepopolnih storitev ali storitev, ki so bile opravljene prepozno;
Considers that such an assessment should examine a possible broad instrument which should at least contain basic general rules requiring adequate information on pricing, contract terms and remedies in the case of defective or delayed services;
poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli povezanost med instrumenti zasebnega mednarodnega prava in instrumenti notranjega trga, da se preprečijo dvomi o tem, kdaj se uporabljajo zakonodaja ali uredbe matične države ali države gostiteljice, in da se ne dopusti vrzeli v ureditvi odgovornosti, ki se uporablja za ponudnike storitev, če je to mogoče;
Calls on the Commission to define clearly the interaction between private international law instruments and internal market instruments with a view to leaving no doubt as to when home or host country legislation or regulation applies and so, as far as possible, to leave no gaps in the liability regime applicable to service providers;
meni, da bi morala Komisija upoštevati vpliv kakršne koli pobude na mala in srednje velika podjetja;
Considers that the Commission should take into account the impact of any initiative on SMEs;
poziva vse tiste, ki so v generalnih direktoratih Komisije vključeni v zakonodajo za storitveni sektor, naj še naprej sodelujejo v nadaljnjem delu skupnega referenčnega okvira, da vključijo dele o storitvenih pogodbah, zlasti na področjih, kjer je že ali pa najbrž še bo nastala čezmejna dejavnost, kot so na primer finančne storitve in zdravstveni sektor;
Calls on all those Commission Directorates-General involved in legislation for the service sector to participate in the continuing work on the Common Frame of Reference with a view to including sections on service contracts, especially in those areas where there is already, or there is likely to be, cross-border activity, such as, by way of example only, financial services and the health sector;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 27. septembra 2007 o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost ( 2007/2094(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 27 September 2007 on the application of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin ( 2007/2094(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov in Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0278/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality and of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0278/2007 ),
ker je EU politični projekt, ki temelji na skupnih vrednotah, kot je varstvo človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki so navedene v členu 6 Pogodbe EU in Listini o temeljnih pravicah, ter spodbuja enakost in nediskriminacijo s politiko in zakonodajo tudi na podlagi člena 13 Pogodbe ES,
whereas the EU is a political project based on common values such as the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, as stated in Article 6 TEU and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and promotes equality and non-discrimination through its policies and laws, also on the basis of Article 13 TEC,
ker je pomembno, da politične izjave o boju proti diskriminaciji spremljata postopen razvoj ter dosledno in pravilno izvajanje politik in zakonov, predvsem direktiv za preprečevanje diskriminacije in projektov za spodbujanje enakosti, kot je evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse,
whereas it is important that political declarations on the fight against discrimination are matched by the progressive development and full and correct implementation of policies and laws, and notably of the anti-discrimination directives and of the projects promoting equality, such as the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All,
C. ker letno poročilo Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije za leto 2006 potrjuje, da je diskriminacija v državah članicah še vedno resen problem; D.
C. whereas the 2006 annual report of the European Monitoring Centre for Racism and Xenophobia confirms that discrimination remains a serious problem in the Member States, D.
ker nedavna raziskava Eurobarometra kaže, da 64 % državljanov v 25 državah članicah, vključenih v raziskavo, meni, da je diskriminacija na podlagi narodnostne pripadnosti še vedno razširjena;
whereas a recent Eurobarometer survey shows that 64% of citizens in 25 Member States surveyed think discrimination based on ethnic origin is still widespread,
ker je sprejetje Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost UL L 180, 19.7.2000, str.
whereas the adoption of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p.
pomemben korak k izboljšanju ravni varstva žrtev diskriminacije na podlagi rase ali narodnosti ter k zagotavljanju boljših možnosti glede odškodnin,
may be seen as a major step in raising the level of protection for victims of discrimination based on racial or ethnic origin and in giving them better possibilities of redress,
ker je določba o dokaznem bremenu ključni vidik direktive, saj prispeva k učinkovitemu uveljavljanju varstva, ki ga zagotavlja;
whereas the burden of proof provision is a key aspect of the Directive because it contributes to the effective enforcement of the protection which it offers,
ker sodna praksa na področju dokaznega bremena kaže, da med državami članicami še vedno obstajajo bistvene razlike v zvezi s tem, kaj je sprejeto kot dokaz prima facie na sodiščih; ker bi bilo zato treba države članice spodbujati, da v zvezi s tem izmenjajo mnenja, da bi ugotovile, ali je mogoče sodne postopke medsebojno uskladiti,
whereas the case-law on the burden of proof shows that there are still considerable divergences between Member States as to what is accepted as prima facie evidence by the courts; whereas Member States should therefore be encouraged to exchange views on the subject, with a view to seeing whether it is possible to bring judicial procedures into line with one another,