natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vključuje splošne cilje in načela ukrepanja upravljavca ter vlogo in odgovornost upravljanja ob upoštevanju nadzora nad nevarnostmi večjih nesreč.
It shall include the operator's overall aims and principles of action and the role and responsibility of management with respect to the control of major-accident hazards.
Izraz „varnostna kultura“ ni povezana z operativnimi zahtevami.
The notion of a ‘safety culture’ has nothing to do with operational requirements.
Politika preprečevanja večjih nesreč se posreduje pristojnemu organu in lokalnim oblastem v naslednjih rokih:
The MAPP shall be sent to the competent authority and local authorities within the following time-limits:
Gre za pojasnitev zakonodajnega besedila.
Clarity of the legislative text.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organ z uporabo informacij, ki jih prejme od upravljavcev v skladu s členoma 6 in 9 ali z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu s členom 19, določi vse organizacije nižje stopnje in višje stopnje ali skupine organizacij, za katere obstajata večja verjetnost in možnost nastanka večjih nesreč ali možnost hujših posledic večjih nesreč zaradi lokacije in bližine takšnih organizacij ali naravnih tveganj zaradi njihove zemljepisne lege ter njihovih zalog nevarnih snovi.
Member States shall ensure that the competent authority, using the information received from the operators in compliance with Articles 6 and 9 or through inspections pursuant to Article 19, identifies all lower-tier and upper-tier establishments or groups of establishments where the likelihood and the possibility or consequences of a major accident may be increased because of the location and the proximity of such establishments, or the natural risks associated with their geographical position, and their inventories of dangerous substances.
Države članice zagotovijo, da pristojni organ ta verižni učinek upošteva pri izdelavi načrtov ukrepov zunaj organizacije ob nesrečah.
Member States shall ensure that the competent authority takes into account the domino effect when drawing up external emergency plans.
( c) organi, ki jih za ta namen imenuje država članica, pripravijo načrt ukrepov zunaj organizacije ob nesrečah za ukrepe, ki jih je treba izvesti zunaj organizacije, v enem letu po prejemu informacij od upravljavca v skladu s točko (b).
(c) the authorities designated for that purpose by the Member State draw up an external emergency plan for the measures to be taken outside the establishment within one year following receipt of the information from the operator pursuant to point (b).
c) organi, ki jih za ta namen imenuje država članica, pripravijo načrt ukrepov zunaj organizacije ob nesrečah za ukrepe, ki jih je treba izvesti zunaj organizacije, v dveh letih po prejemu informacij od upravljavca v skladu s točko (b).
c) the authorities designated for that purpose by the Member State draw up an external emergency plan for the measures to be taken outside the establishment within two years following receipt of the information from the operator pursuant to point (b).
Enoletno obdobje ni realistično zaradi narave potrebnega dela in fiksnih rokov postopka (posvetovanje z javnostjo, ki traja dva meseca, priglasitev, odobritev ...).
The nature of the efforts required and the fixed timeframes involved (two-month public consultation, notification, approval, etc.) mean that one year is not enough.
Že samo upravni roki in posvetovanje trajajo več kot šest mesecev.
The administrative deadlines and consultation periods alone account for more than six months.
(ca) posredovanje pomembnih informacij podizvajalskim podjetjem v organizaciji;
(ca) communicating the relevant information to sub ‑contractors at the site;
Države članice zagotovijo, da upravljavci organizacij nižje stopnje na zahtevo pristojnega organa zagotovijo dovolj informacij o tveganjih, povezanih z organizacijo, ki so potrebne za namene načrtovanja prostora.
Member States shall ensure that operators of lower-tier establishments provide, at the request of the competent authority, sufficient information on the risks arising from the establishment necessary for land-use planning purposes.
Države članice zagotovijo, da upravljavci organizacij nižje stopnje na zahtevo pristojnega organa in lokalnih organov zagotovijo informacije o tveganjih, povezanih z organizacijo, za katere menijo, da so potrebne za namene načrtovanja prostora.
Member States shall ensure that operators of lower-tier establishments provide, at the request of the competent authority and local authorities , the information it deems necessary on the risks arising from the establishment necessary for land-use planning purposes.
O količini in kakovosti informacij, ki so potrebne za opredelitev stopnje varnosti v organizaciji, odloča pristojni organ.
It is up to the competent authority to decide as to the quantity and quality of information it needs to ascertain precisely what level of safety has been reached in the establishment.
Informacije se pregledujejo in po potrebi posodobijo vsaj enkrat na leto.
The information shall be reviewed and where necessary updated at least once a year.
Države članice zagotovijo, da so informacije iz delov 1 in 2 Priloge V vedno dostopne javnosti, tudi v elektronski obliki , informacije iz Dela 3 Priloge V pa so razpoložljive na zahtevo .
Member States shall ensure that the information referred to in Parts 1 and 2 of Annex V is permanently available to the public, including in electronic format and that the information referred to in Part 3 of Annex V is made available to the public upon request .
Na podlagi inšpekcijskega poročila in inventarja nevarnih snovi morda obstajajo gospodarski in varnostni razlogi, da se javnosti zagotovijo informacije samo na zahtevo.
Regarding the inspection reports and the inventory of dangerous substances there might be economic and security reasons to only provide the information to the public on request.
V tem primeru bi se lahko države članice same odločile, ali bi bilo primerno od upravljavcev zahtevati, naj to informacijo objavijo na spletu.
The Member States could then decide themselves whether they consider it to be appropriate to require the operators to put this information also on the internet.
Kot je navedeno v predlogu spremembe Priloge V, bi morali biti upravljavci dolžni zagotoviti enostavno razlago o nevarnih snoveh na spletu in navesti, kdaj so bili v organizaciji izvedeni inšpekcijski pregledi in kje je mogoče zahtevati inšpekcijsko poročilo.
As indicated in the amendments to Annex V, operators should be obliged to explain the dangerous substances in simple terms on the internet and to indicate when an establishment has been inspected and where the inspection reports can be requested.
Dostop do informacij iz odstavkov 1 in 2 se obravnava v skladu z Direktivo 2003/4/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28 . januarja 2003 o dostopu javnosti do informacij o okolju .
Access to the information referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be handled in accordance with Directive 2003/4/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information .
V tem odstavku ni primerno uporabiti „zahteve za dostop“, saj bi bilo treba informacije iz člena 2(a) zagotoviti brez posebne zahteve.
As the information referred to in 2(a) should be provided without specific request, it is not correct to use "Requests for access" in this paragraph.
Poleg tega bi morala biti odstavka 1 in 2 v celoti v skladu s celotno Direktivo 2003/4/ES.
Furthermore, the whole of paragraph 1 and 2 should be in accordance with the whole of Directive 2003/4/EC.
(ba) v primeru okoljske škode ponovno vzpostavi prvotno stanje v okolju, kjer je možno, in ustrezno poplača nastalo škodo, ki jo je utrpelo prebivalstvo, v skladu z Direktivo 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode 1 ;
(ba) to restore the environment, in the case of proven environmental damage to its original condition, where possible, and to appropriately compensate the population affected, as provided for in Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage 1 ;
(ca) sprejme vse ukrepe za obveščanje žrtev o njihovih pravicah ter
(ca) to take all necessary measures to inform victims of their rights; and
Za žrtve sta potrebna priznanje in podpora.
Victims require recognition and support.
To je predmet novega člena 15a, v katerem morajo biti opredeljene pravice žrtev pred začetkom izvajanja te direktive.
This is the purpose of the new Article 15(a), which should be introduced to legislate on victims’ rights before the directive is implemented.
(c) sodelovanje upravljavca v sistemu Unije za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ali enakovrednemu priznanemu sistemu okoljskega upravljanja .
(c) participation of the operator in the Union eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council , or in an equivalent recognised environmental management scheme .
Treba je zagotoviti možnost, da se poleg sistema EMAS uporabljajo tudi drugi priznani sistemi okoljskega upravljanja, na primer ISO, ki se zelo pogosto uporablja v mednarodno dejavnih podjetjih.
It ought to be possible to participate in environmental management schemes other than EMAS, e.g. schemes like ISO, which are very widely used by international companies.
Ta zahteva je v skladu z določbami točke a) Priloge III tega predloga direktive.
This chimes with the provisions laid down in Annex III, point (a) to the proposal for a directive.
Inšpekcijski pregledi se , kadar je to mogoče, uskladijo z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Unije in se, kadar je to ustrezno , med seboj kombinirajo.
Inspections shall whenever possible be coordinated with inspections under other Union legislation and combined, where appropriate .
Inšpekcijski pregledi se uskladijo z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Unije , zlasti z Direktivo 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) 1 in se, kolikor je mogoče , med seboj kombinirajo.
Inspections shall be coordinated with inspections under other Union legislation , in particular Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) 1 , and , to the extent possible, combined.
Zahteve po informacijah, ki jih prejmejo pristojni organi v skladu s to direktivo , se lahko zavrnejo , če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 4(2) Direktive 2003/4/ES.
Requests for information obtained by the competent authorities under this Directive may be refused where the conditions down in Article 4(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC are fulfilled.
Dostop do informacij v skladu s to direktivo se lahko omeji , če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 4(2) Direktive 2003/4/ES.
Access to information under this Directive may be restricted where the conditions laid down in Article 4(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC are fulfilled.
Komisija šest mesecev po sprejetju akta o prilagoditvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 tehničnemu napredku preuči, ali je treba zaradi snovi, ki morda pomenijo nevarnost večje nesreče, in meril za uporabo člena 4, prilagoditi tudi Prilogo I.
Within six months of the adoption of an adaptation to technical progress made to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the Commission shall assess whether Annex I needs to be adapted, taking into account the major accident hazard potential of a substance and the criteria for the application of Article 4.
Uskladitev področja uporabe direktive Seveso Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 (uredba CLP) in njeno prilagajanje bi morala postati nenehen proces, saj uredba CLP že po naravi predpostavlja dinamičen proces.
The alignment of the scope of the Seveso Directive to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) and its adaptations should become an on-going process, as CLP is by nature a dynamic process.
Brez poseganja v člen 4 Komisija zaradi prilagoditve Dela 3 Priloge I in prilog II do VI tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku sprejme delegirane akte v skladu s členom 24.
Without prejudice to Article 4, in order to adapt Part 3 of Annex I and Annexes II to VI to technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24.
Z delegiranimi akti bi moralo biti mogoče spreminjati Del 3 Priloge I (ki spreminja področje uporabe, vendar samo v posebnih dobro opredeljenih okoliščinah) in prilog II do VI.
It should be possible to amend part 3 of Annex I (which changes the scope, but only for very specific well defined cases) and the Annexes II to VI by delegated acts.
Spremembe delov 1 in 2 Priloge I in Priloge VII pa bi lahko zelo vplivale na področje uporabe, zato bi jih morali obravnavati po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
Amendments to Part 1 and 2 of Annex I and to Annex VII can have a major impact on the scope and should therefore be dealt with through the ordinary legislative procedure.
Priloga I – Del 1 – Oddelek P – stolpec 1
Annex I – Part 1 – Section P – box 1
P1a EKSPLOZIVI (glej opombo 8)
P1a EXPLOSIVES (see note 8)
–...nestabilni eksplozivi, ali
-....Unstable explosives or
–...eksplozivi, podrazred 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5 ali 1.6, ali
-....Explosives, Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5 or 1.6, or
Ta kategorija zajema izdelke, ki so po direktivi CLP razvrščeni kot eksplozivi, in snovi ali zmesi, ki imajo eksplozivne lastnosti v skladu z metodo A.14 uredbe ES št. 440/2008.
This category includes products classified as explosive under the CLP Regulation, as well as substances or mixtures with explosive properties as established using method A.14 under Regulation EC No 440/2008.
Zaradi skladnosti in jasnosti bi bilo treba pri eksplozivih in drugih kategorijah uporabiti samo merila za razvrstitev po direktivi CLP, ne pa tudi drugih metod za razvrstitev.
To ensure the legislation is clear and coherent, it would be a good idea to stick to the classification criteria for explosives and the other categories set out in the CLP Regulation, rather than taking account of other classification methods.
Priloga I – Del 1 – Oddelek E – stolpca 1 in 2
Annex I – Part 1 – Section E - boxes 1 and 2
Oddelek E – NEVARNOSTI ZA OKOLJE
Section ‘E’ – ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS
E1 Nevarno za vodno okolje v kategoriji akutno 1 ali kronično 1
E1 Hazardous to the Aquatic Environment in Category Acute 1 or Chronic 1
E2 Nevarno za vodno okolje v kategoriji
E2 Hazardous to the Aquatic Environment in Category
kronično 2
Chronic 2
E1 Nevarno za vodno okolje v kategoriji
E1 Hazardous to the Aquatic Environment in Category
akutno 1 ali kronično 1 (snovi z M≥10)
Acute 1 or Chronic 1 (substances with M≥10)
akutno 1 ali kronično 1 (snovi z M=1 in zmes)
Acute 1 and Chronic 1 (substances with M=1 and mixture)
E3 Nevarno za vodno okolje v kategoriji
E3 Hazardous to the Aquatic Environment in Category
Spremembe sistema razvrščanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 (CLP), ki zadevajo tveganja za okolje, v predlogu Komisije niso ustrezno razvidne.
The classification changes in the CLP Regulation ((EC) No 1272/2008) are insufficiently reflected in the Commission proposal as far as risks to the environment are concerned.
Zato bo več organizacij umetno razvrščenih v področje uporabe direktive Seveso, čeprav ne predstavljajo novih tveganj za večje nesreče.
This means that more establishments that do not pose any new major-accident hazards will needlessly be brought under the Seveso provisions.
Nekatere spremembe glede mejnih vrednosti, ki zadevajo tveganja za okolje, niso bile prilagojene spremembam pravil sistema razvrščanja, zlasti drugega sporazuma ATP uredbe CLP.
Some of the changes to the prescribed thresholds for environmental hazards have not been adapted to take account of the changes made to the classification rules, in particular the second adaptation of the CLP Regulation to technical progress.
Priloga I – Del 2 – stolpec 37 b (novo)
Annex I – Part 2 – box 37 b (new)
Eterična olja in podobne snovi (opomba 19a)
Essential oils and similar substances (see note 19a)
Pragi nevarnosti za vodno okolje ne upoštevajo sprememb sistema razvrščanja iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008.
The aquatic environment hazard thresholds fail to take account of the classification changes in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Pragi v vrednosti 1000/5000 bi bili bolj prilagojeni tem proizvodom kmetijskega izvora, ki se pakirajo in shranjujejo v sodih s kapaciteto 180 kg neto, brez nevarnosti domino efekta, če so shranjeni v skupnem zaprtem prostoru.
Thresholds of 1000 / 5000 would be more appropriate for these products of agricultural origin packaged and stored in 180 kg net drums, with which there is no risk of a domino effect where they are stored in a single sealed-off area.
Drugače bi mnoga podjetja, pogosto mala in srednja podjetja, specializirana za proizvodnjo, shranjevanje, distribucijo ali mešanje eteričnih olj, spadala pod direktivo Seveso, ne da bi predstavljala nova tveganja za velike nesreče.
A large number of undertakings – many of them SMEs which specialise in producing, storing, distributing or blending essential oils – would otherwise come under the Seveso provisions without posing any new major-accident hazards.
Priloga I – Opombe k prilogi 1 – točka 3 a (novo)
Annex I – Notes to Annex 1 – point 3 a (new)
Zmesi, ki so razvrščene kot nevarne za okolje v oddelkih E1 in E2 v Delu 2, se pri določitvi količin za razvrstitev ne upoštevajo, če so pakirane v omejenih količinah (posamično pakiranje do 5 litrov/5 kg in skupno pakiranje do 30 kg).
When determining the qualifying quantities, mixtures classified as hazardous to the environment under sections E1 and E2 in Part 2 shall not be taken into account when they are packaged in limited quantities (inner pack up to 5 litres/5kg and combination pack up to 30 kg).
Tako kot velja za prevoz, je tudi pakiranje način za zmanjšanje nevarnosti izpusta snovi v okolje.
As in the case of transportation, packaging is a means of mitigating the risk of accidental release into the environment.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je uskladitev direktive s standardi iz Evropskega sporazuma o mednarodnem prevozu nevarnega blaga po cesti (ADR 2011).
This amendment brings this Directive in line with the standards already established under ADR 2011 European Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road.
Priloga I – Opombe k prilogi 1 – točka 19 a (novo)
Annex I – Notes to Annex 1 – point 19 a (new)
Eterična olja in podobne snovi (1000/5000):
Essential oils and similar substances (1000/5000)
To se uporablja za eterična olja in podobne snovi, kot so opredeljene s standardom ISO 9235, razen za tiste, razvrščene kot akutno strupene, kategorija 1 – vse vrste izpostavljenosti, kategorija 2 – vse vrste izpostavljenosti in kategorija 3 – načina izpostavljenosti v stiku s kožo in pri vdihavanju (glej opombo 7) in strupene za posamezne organe (STOT) – enkratna izpostavljenost, kategorija 1.
This applies to essential oils and similar substances as defined by the ISO 9235 standard, with the exception of those in acute toxicity category 1 – all exposure routes, category 2 – all exposure routes and category 3 – dermal and inhalation routes (see Note 7), and specific target organ toxicity (STOT) – single exposure, category 1.
a) opis glavnih dejavnosti in proizvodov delov organizacije, navedba podizvajalskih podjetij, ki so pomembni z vidika varnosti, ter opis virov tveganj za večje nesreče in razmer, v katerih bi se takšna večja nesreča lahko zgodila, skupaj z opisom predlaganih preventivnih ukrepov;
a) description of the main activities and products of the parts of the establishment , and identification of sub ‑contractors, which are important from the point of view of safety, sources of major-accident risks and conditions under which such a major accident could happen, together with a description of proposed preventive measures;
(v) varnostno kulturo, tj. ukrepi za oceno in izboljšanje varnostne kulture;
(v) safety culture — measures to assess and improve safety culture;
Predlog o novem postopku v sistemu upravljanja varnosti v zvezi z varnostno kulturo je nejasen.
The proposal to include ‘safety culture’ in the section on safety management systems seems rather vague.
Evropska industrijska oprema se stara in je bila malokrat obnovljena.
Europe has an ageing industrial landscape with low levels of renovation.
Za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varnosti so potrebni novi postopki, ki morajo postati del vsakdanjega delovanja organizacije (okrepljen nadzor, zamenjava izrabljenih delov itd.).
In order to ensure a high level of safety, new procedures must be introduced and made part of the day-to-day running of an establishment (e.g. an increased level of monitoring, replacement of worn parts, etc.).
Postopki ne morejo ostati enaki, kot so bili v času začetka delovanja organizacije.
Procedures cannot remain as they were when the establishment concerned was new.
Priloga IV – Del 1 – točka e a (novo)
Annex IV – Part 1 – point e a (new)
(ea) Ureditve za usposabljanje osebja za naloge, ki jih bodo morali opravljati, in po potrebi za usklajevanje tega s službami zunaj organizacije za ukrepanje ob nesrečah.
(ea) Arrangements for training staff in the duties which they will be expected to perform and, where necessary, coordinating them with off-site emergency services.
Priloga V – Del 1 – točka 6
Annex V – Part 1 – point 6
To določbo je treba črtati zaradi resnih tveganj, povezanih z objavo ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti na območjih Seveso, ki bi lahko bile uporabljene v namene terorizma in gospodarsko obveščevalne dejavnosti.
This provision has to be deleted in view of the high risks that publicising the weak points identified at Seveso sites would pose in terms of terrorism and economic intelligence.
Priloga V – Del 2 – točka 1
Annex V – Part 2 – point 1
Povzetek glavnih predvidenih potekov večjih nesreč in glavnih vrst dogodkov, ki lahko sprožijo vsakega od teh predvidenih potekov.
Summary details of the main types of major-accident scenarios and the main types of events which may play a role in triggering each of these scenarios.
Iz istega razloga kot v prvem delu te priloge se ne sme objaviti glavnih predvidenih potekov večjih nesreč, še manj pa virov, ki lahko sprožijo morebitne nesreče.
As was the case with regard to part 1 of this annex, it is vital that details of the main types of major-accident scenarios, and, even more importantly, the types of events that might trigger such scenarios, are not made public.
Edine informacije, ki se lahko objavijo, so netehnični povzetki študije nevarnosti.
The only information available for distribution should be the non-technical summary of the hazard assessment study.
Priloga VI – Del 2 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Annex VI – Part 2 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) šest oseb je poškodovanih v organizaciji in hospitaliziranih najmanj 24 ur;
(b) six persons injured within the establishment and hospitalized for at least 24 hours;
(b) najmanj dve osebi v organizaciji sta poškodovani in hospitalizirani najmanj 24 ur;
(b) two or more persons injured within the establishment and hospitalized for at least 24 hours;
Priloga VII – odstavek 1 (novo)
Annex VII – paragraph 1 (new)
Majhnih količin snovi, strupenih za okolje, ne bi smeli upoštevati, ob upoštevanju količine, ki se lahko izpusti.
Storing a small amount of a substance that is toxic to the environment should not be taken into account, in view of the quantity that can be released.
Izpust strupene snovi za okolje, ki je shranjena v majhnih količinah, nima enakih posledic za okolje kot v primeru izpusta iz skladiščnega rezervoarja.
A leak involving a small amount of a substance that is toxic to the environment does not have the same impact on the environment as a leak from a storage tank.