natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(10a) Da pa bi lahko upravičenci uživali pravice, ki so nanje prešle z dedovanjem, v drugi državi članici, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti, da se neznana stvarna pravica prilagodi najbolj enakovredni stvarni pravici po pravu te druge države.
(10a) However, in order t o allow the beneficiaries to enjoy in another Member State the rights which have been created or transferred to them by succession , this Regulation should provide for the adaptation of an unknown right in rem to the closest equivalent right in rem under the law of that other Member State.
Pri tej prilagoditvi bi bilo treba upoštevati namene in interese določene stvarne pravice ter z njo povezane učinke.
When proceeding to such an adaptation account should be taken of the aims and the interests pursued by the specific right in rem and the effects attached to it.
Organi ali pristojne osebe v državi, katere pravo se je uporabilo za dedovanje, se lahko zaprosijo za dodatne informacije o naravi in učinkih stvarne pravice, če je to potrebno za določitev najbolj enakovredne nacionalne stvarne pravice.
For the purposes of determining the closest equivalent national right in rem, the authorities or competent persons of the State whose law applied to the succession may be contacted for further information on the nature and the effects of the right.
V ta namen bi bilo treba uporabiti obstoječe mreže za pravosodno sodelovanje v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in druga razpoložljiva sredstva za lažje razumevanje tujega prava.
In this context, the existing networks in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters could be used as well as any other available means facilitating the understanding of foreign law.
(10b) Prilagoditev neznanih stvarnih pravic, določena v tej uredbi, ne bi smela izključevati drugih oblik prilagoditev v okviru uporabe te uredbe.
(10b) The adaptation of unknown rights in rem as explicitly provided for by this Regulation should not preclude other forms of adaptation in the context of the application of this Regulation.
(10c) Zahteve za vpis pravice na nepremičnini ali premičnini v register bi morale biti izključene iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
(10c) The requirements for the recording in a register of a right in immovable or movable property should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Zato bi moralo zakonske pogoje in način vpisa pravice ter organe (kot so zemljiška knjiga ali notarji), pristojne, da preverijo, ali so izpolnjene vse zahteve in ali je predložena ali veljavna dokumentacija zadostna oziroma vsebuje vse potrebne informacije, določati pravo države članice, v kateri se vodi register (za nepremičnine, lex rei sitae).
It should therefore be the law of the Member State in which the register is kept (for immoveable property, the lex rei sitae) which determines under what legal conditions and how the recording must be carried out and which authorities, such as land registers or notaries, are in charge of checking that all requirements are met and that the documentation presented or established is sufficient or contains the necessary information.
Organi lahko zlasti preverijo, ali je pravica zapustnika na zapuščinskem premoženju, ki je navedena v listini, predloženi za vpis, vpisana v register ali kako drugače izkazana v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri se vodi register.
In particular, the authorities may check that the right of the deceased to the succession property mentioned in the document presented for registration is a right which is recorded as such in the register or which is otherwise demonstrated in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the register is kept.
Da ne bi prišlo do podvajanja listin, bi morali organi, pristojni za vpis, priznati listine, ki jih sestavijo pristojni organi v drugi državi članici in katerih obtok je predviden v tej uredbi.
In order to avoid duplication of documents, the registration authorities should accept such documents drawn up in another Member State by the competent authorities whose circulation is provided for by this Regulation.
Zlasti evropsko potrdilo o dedovanju, ki se izda v skladu s to uredbo, bi moral biti veljavna listina za vpis zapuščinskega premoženja v register države članice.
In particular, the European Certificate of Succession issued under this Regulation should constitute a valid document for the recording of succession property in a register of a Member State .
To ne pomeni, da organi, pristojni za vpis, ne morejo zahtevati, naj oseba, ki zaprosi za vpis, zagotovi dodatne informacije ali predloži dodatne listine, ki se zahtevajo po pravu države članice, v kateri se vodi register, na primer informacije ali lisitne v zvezi s plačilom davka.
This should not preclude the authorities involved in the registration from ask ing the person applying for registration to provide such additional information, or to present such additional documents as are required under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept, for instance information or documents relating to the payment of revenue.
Pristojni organ lahko osebi, ki zaprosi za vpis, svetuje, kako lahko dobi manjkajoče informacije ali listine.
The competent authority may indicate to the person applying for registration how the missing information or documents can be provided.
(10d) Iz področja uporabe te uredbe bi morali biti izključeni tudi učinki vpisa pravice v register.
(10d) The effects of the recording of a right in a register should also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Zato bi moralo pravo države članice, v kateri se vodi register, določati, ali ima vpis na primer deklaratorni ali konstitutivni učinek.
It should therefore be the law of the Member State in which the register is kept which determines whether the recording is, for instance, declaratory or constitutive in effect.
Če je torej po pravu države članice, ki vodi register, pridobitev pravice na nepremičnini treba vpisati v register, da se zagotovi učinek erga omnes takega vpisa ali da se zaščitijo pravne transakcije, pravo te države določa, kdaj se takšna pravica pridobi.
Thus, where, for example, the acquisition of a right in an immovable property has to be recorded in a register under the law of the Member State in which the register is kept in order to ensure the erga omnes effect of registers or to protect legal transactions, the moment of such acquisition should be governed by the law of that Member State.
(11) Ta uredba bi morala upoštevati različne sisteme za urejanje dednih zadev, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
(11) This Regulation should respect the different systems for dealing with matters of succession applied in the Member States.
Zato bi moral imeti izraz „sodišče” v tej uredbi širok pomen, tako da se ne bi nanašal le na sodišča v pravem pomenu besede, ki izvajajo sodno funkcijo, temveč tudi na notarje ali matične urade v nekaterih državah članicah, ki v nekaterih dednih zadevah tako kot sodišča izvajajo sodno funkcijo, ter na notarje in poklicne pravnike v nekaterih državah članicah, ki v določenih dednih zadevah izvajajo sodno funkcijo na podlagi prenosa pooblastil s strani sodišča .
For the purposes of this Regulation the term "court" should therefore be given a broad meaning so as to cover not only courts in the true sense of the word, exercising judicial functions, but also the notaries or registry offices in some Member States who or which, in certain matters of succession, exercise judicial functions like courts, and the notaries and legal professionals who, in some Member States, exercise judicial functions in a given succession by delegation of power by a court.
Za vsa sodišča, kot so opredeljena v tej uredbi, bi morala veljati pravila o pristojnosti iz te uredbe.
All courts as defined in this Regulation should be bound by the rules of jurisdiction set out in this Regulation.
Nasprotno pa izraz „sodišče” ne bi smel vključevati zunajsodnih organov držav članic, ki so po nacionalnem pravu pooblaščeni za obravnavanje dednih zadev, kot so notarji v večini držav članic, v katerih navadno ne izvajajo sodne funkcije.
C onversely, the term "court" should not cover non-judicial authorities of a Member State empowered under national law to deal with matters of succession, such as the notaries in most Member States where, as is the usual case, they are not exercising judicial functions.
(11a) Ta uredba bi morala vsem notarjem, ki so pristojni za obravnavanje dednih zadev v državah članicah, omogočiti izvajanje te pristojnosti.
(11a) This Regulation should allow all notaries who have competence in matters of succession in the Member States to exercise such competence.
Ali za notarje v določeni državi veljajo pravila o pristojnosti iz te uredbe, bi moralo biti odvisno od tega, ali spadajo v opredelitev sodišča iz te uredbe.
Whether or not the notaries in a given Member State are bound by the rules of jurisdiction set out in this Regulation should depend on whether or not they are covered by the term "court" for the purposes of this Regulation.
(11b) Listine, ki jih notarji izdajo v dednih zadevah v državah članicah, bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu s to uredbo.
(11b) Acts issued by notaries in matters of succession in the Member States should circulate under this Regulation.
Če notarji izvajajo sodno funkcijo, zanje veljajo pravila o pristojnosti, sodne odločbe, ki jih izdajo, pa bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu z določbami o priznavanju, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju sodnih odločb.
When notaries exercise judicial functions they are bound by the rules of jurisdiction, and the decisions they give should circulate in accordance with the provisions on recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions.
Če notarji ne izvajajo sodne funkcije, zanje ne veljajo pravila o pristojnosti, javne listine, ki jih izdajo, pa bi morale biti v obtoku v skladu z določbami o javnih listinah.
When notaries do not exercise judicial functions they are not bound by the rules of jurisdiction, and the authentic instruments they issue should circulate in accordance with the provisions on authentic instruments.
(12) Ob upoštevanju vse večje mobilnosti evropskih državljanov bi bilo treba zaradi zagotovitve pravilnega delovanja pravosodja v Evropski uniji in zagotovitve, da med dedovanjem in državo članico, v kateri se izvaja pristojnost, obstaja resnična navezna okoliščina , v tej uredbi določiti, da mora biti splošna navezna okoliščina za določitev pristojnosti in tudi prava, ki se uporablja, običajno prebivališče zapustnika v trenutku njegove smrti .
(12) In view of the increasing mobility of citizens and in order to ensure the proper administration of justice within the Union and to ensure that a genuine connecting factor exists between the succession and the Member State in which jurisdiction is exercised , this Regulation should provide that the general connecting factor for the purposes of determining both jurisdiction and the applicable law should be the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death.
Da bi se določilo običajno prebivališče, bi moral organ, ki obravnava dedno zadevo, oceniti vse okoliščine življenja zapustnika v letih pred njegovo smrtjo in ob njegovi smrti, pri čemer bi moral upoštevati vsa pomembna dejstva, zlasti kako dolgo in kako pogosto je zapustnik bival v zadevni državi, pa tudi pod kakšnimi pogoji in zakaj je tam bival.
In order to determine the habitual residence, the authority dealing with the succession should make an overall assessment of the circumstances of the life of the deceased during the years preceding his death and at the time of his death, taking account of all relevant factual elements, in particular the duration and regularity of the deceased's presence in the State concerned and the conditions and reasons for that presence.
Tako določeno običajno prebivališče bi moralo izkazovati posebej tesno in trdno povezavo z zadevno državo, upoštevajoč posebne cilje te uredbe.
The habitual residence thus determined should reveal a close and stable connection with the State concerned taking into account the specific aims of this Regulation.
(12a) V nekaterih primerih se lahko izkaže, da je določitev običajnega prebivališča zapustnika zapletena.
(12a) In certain cases, determining the deceased's habitual residence may prove complex.
Do takšnega primera bi lahko zlasti prišlo, če je zapustnik iz poklicnih ali ekonomskih razlogov odšel delat v tujino, lahko tudi za dalj časa, vendar je ohranil tesno in trdno povezavo z državo izvora.
Such a case may arise, in particular, where the deceased for professional or economic reasons had gone to live abroad to work there, sometimes for a long t ime, but had maintained a close and stable connection with his State of origin.
V takšnem primeru se glede na okoliščine lahko šteje, da ima zapustnik še vedno običajno prebivališče v svoji državi izvora, ki je še vedno središče interesov njegove družine in kjer se je odvijalo njegovo družabno življenje.
In such a case, the deceased could, depending on the circumstances of the case, be considered still to have his habitual residence in his State of origin in which the centre of interests of his family and his social life was located.
Do drugih zapletenih primerov bi lahko prišlo, če je zapustnik izmenično živel v več državah ali potoval iz ene države v drugo, ne da bi se v kateri stalno naselil.
Other complex cases may arise where the deceased lived in several States alternately or travelled from one State to another without settling permanently in any of them.
Če je bil zapustnik državljan ene od teh držav ali je imel vse glavno premoženje v eni od teh držav, bi bilo lahko državljanstvo ali kraj, kjer se premoženje nahaja, poseben dejavnik v skupni oceni vseh dejanskih okoliščin.
If the deceased was a national of one of those States or had all his main assets in one of those States, the nationality or the location of the assets could be a special factor in the overall assessment of all the factual circumstances.
(12b) Za določitev prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, lahko organ, ki obravnava dedovanje, v izjemnih primerih, če se je zapustnik na primer razmeroma nedavno pred smrtjo preselil v državo, v kateri je imel običajno prebivališče, in je iz vseh okoliščin zadeve jasno, da je bil očitno tesneje povezan z neko drugo državo, zaključi, da bi moralo biti pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, pravo države, s katero je bil zapustnik očitno tesneje povezan, ne pa pravo države, v kateri je imel običajno prebivališče.
(12b) With regard to the determination of the law applicable to the succession the authority dealing with the succession may in exceptional cases – where, for instance, the deceased had moved to the State of his habitual residence fairly recently before his death and all the circumstances of the case indicate that he was manifestly more closely connected with another State – arrive at the conclusion that the law applicable to the succession should not be the law of the State of the habitual residence of the deceased but rather the law of the State with which the deceased was manifestly more closely connected.
Vendar se očitno najtesnejša povezava ne bi smela uporabljati kot pomožna navezna okoliščina vsakič, ko bi se določanje običajnega prebivališča zapustnika ob njegovi smrti izkazalo za težavno.
That manifestly closest connection should , however , not be resorted to as a subsidiary connecting factor whenever the determination of the habitual residence of the deceased at the time of death proves complex.
(12c) Ta uredba v ničemer ne bi smela preprečevati sodiščem, da uporabijo mehanizme za preprečevanje izogibanja zakonov, kot je izigravanje zakonodaje (fraus legis) v mednarodnem zasebnem pravu.
(12c) Nothing in this Regulation should prevent a court from applying mechanisms designed to tackle the evasion of the law, such as fraude à la loi in the context of private international law.
(12d) Pravila te uredbe so zasnovana tako, da bo organ, ki obravnava dedno zadevo, v večini primerov uporabil svoje pravo.
(12d) The rules of this Regulation are devised so as to ensure that the authority dealing with the succession will, in most situations, be applying its own law.
Ta uredba zato predvideva vrsto mehanizmov, ki bi se uporabili v primerih, ko bi zapustnik za pravo, ki ureja dedovanje po njem, izbral pravo države članice, katere državljan je bil.
This Regulation therefore provides for a series of mechanisms which would come into play where the deceased had chosen as the law to govern his succession the law of a Member State of which he was a national.
(12e) Eden od teh mehanizmov bi moral strankam v dedni zadevi omogočiti, da sklenejo dogovor o izbiri sodišča v korist sodišč države članice, katere pravo je bilo izbrano.
(12e) One such mechanism should be to allow the parties concerned by the succession to conclude a choice - of - court agreement in favour of the courts of the Member State of the chosen law.
Za vsak primer posebej bi bilo treba glede na vprašanje, na katero se nanaša dogovor o izbiri sodišča, določiti, ali morajo dogovor skleniti vse stranke v dedni zadevi ali pa se lahko nekatere od njih dogovorijo, da pred izbranim sodiščem začnejo postopek glede točno določenega vprašanja, če odločitev sodišča o tem vprašanju ne bi vplivala na druge stranke.
It would have to be determined on a case - by - case basis, depending in particular on the issue covered by the choice - of - court agreement, whether the agreement would have to be concluded between all parties concerned by the succession or whether some of them could agree to bring a specific issue before the chosen court in a situation where the decision by that court on that issue would not affect the rights of the other parties to the succession.
(12f) Sodišče, ki je začelo postopek v dedni zadevi po uradni dolžnosti, kot to poteka v nekaterih državah članicah, bi moralo končati postopek, če se stranke dogovorijo, da bodo dedovanje sporazumno uredile z izvensodno poravnavo v državi članici, katere pravo je bilo izbrano.
(12f) A court seised of the succession of its own motion, as is the case in certain Member States, should close the proceedings if the parties agree to settle the succession amicably out of court in the Member State of the chosen law.
Če sodišče postopka ni začelo po uradni dolžnosti, ta uredba ne bi smela preprečevati strankam, da dedovanje sporazumno uredijo zunaj sodišč (na primer pri notarju) v državi članici, ki so jo izbrale, če je to mogoče po pravu te države članice.
Where a court is not seised of its own motion, this Regulation should not prevent the parties from settling the succession amicably out of court, for instance before a notary, in a Member State of their choice where this is possible under the law of that Member State.
To bi moralo veljati, tudi če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ni pravo te države članice.
This should be the case even if the law applicable to the succession is not the law of that Member State .
(13) Da bi zagotovili, da bodo lahko sodišča vseh držav članic izvajala pristojnost za odločanje o dedovanju po osebah, ki ob smrti niso imele običajnega prebivališča v državi članici, na podlagi istih razlogov, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi taksativno in po pomembnosti našteti razloge, na podlagi katerih je mogoče izvajati takšno subsidiarno pristojnost.
(13) In order to ensure that the courts of all Member States may, on the same grounds, exercise jurisdiction in relation to the succession of persons not habitually resident in a Member State at the time of death, this Regulation should list exhaustively, in a hierarchical order, the grounds on which such subsidiary jurisdiction may be exercised .
(13a) Da bi odpravili zlasti primere odrekanja sodnega varstva, bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti tudi forum necessitatis, tako da bi lahko sodišče neke države članice izjemoma odločalo o dedovanju, ki je tesno povezano s tretjo državo.
(13a) In order to remedy, in particular, situations of denial of justice this Regulation should provide a forum necessitatis allowing a court of a Member State, on an exceptional basis, to rule on a succession which is closely connected with a third State.
Do takšnega izjemnega primera bi lahko prišlo, če postopek v tretji državi ne bi bili mogoč, na primer zaradi državljanske vojne, ali če ni mogoče upravičeno pričakovati, da bo upravičenec lahko začel ali izvedel postopek v tej državi.
Such an exceptional basis may be deemed to exist when proceedings prove impossible in the third State in question, for example because of civil war, or when a beneficiary cannot reasonably be expected to initiate or conduct proceedings in that State.
Pristojnost na podlagi forum necessitatis pa bi se lahko izvajala le, če bi bila zadeva v zadostni meri povezana z državo članico, v kateri je sodišče, pred katerim se je začel postopek.
Jurisdiction based on forum necessitatis should, however, be exercised only if the case has a sufficient connection with the Member State of the court seised.
(14) Za olajšanje življenja dedičev in volilojemnikov, ki nimajo običajnega prebivališča v državi članici, v kateri poteka ali bo potekal zapuščinski postopek , bi morala ta uredba vsem osebam, ki lahko po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje , dajo izjave o sprejemu dediščine, volila ali nujnega deleža ali odpovedi dediščini , volilu ali nujnemu deležu ali omejitvi svoje odgovornosti za zapustnikove dolgove, omogočiti, da dajo takšne izjave v obliki, določeni s pravom države, v kateri imajo običajno prebivališče, ▌pred sodišči te države članice .
(14) In order to simplify the lives of heirs and legatees habitually resident in a Member State other than that in which the succession is being or will be dealt with , this Regulation should allow any person entitled under the law applicable to the succession to make declarations concerning the acceptance or the waiver of the succession, a legacy or a reserved share , or concerning the limitation of his liability for the debts of the estate , to make such declarations in the form provided for in the law of the Member State of his habitual residence ▌ before the courts of that Member State.
To ne bi smelo pomeniti, da takšnih izjav ni mogoče dati pred drugimi organi v tej državi članici, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom pristojni za sprejemanje izjav.
This should not preclude such declarations being made before other authorities in that Member State which are competent to receive declarations under national law.
Osebe, ki se bodo odločile za možnost, da dajo izjavo v državi članici, v kateri imajo običajno prebivališče, bi morale sodišče ali organ, ki vodi ali bo vodil zapuščinski postopek, same obvestiti o obstoju takšnih izjav v roku, ki ga določa pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
P ersons choosing to avail themselves of the possibility to make declarations in the Member State of their habitual residence should themselves inform the court or authority which is or will be dealing with the succession of the existence of such declarations within any time - limit set by the law applicable to the succession.
(14a) Če želi oseba omejiti svojo odgovornost za zapustnikove dolgove, za to ne bi smela zadostovati izjava v ta namen pri sodiščih ali drugih pristojnih organih države članice, v kateri ima običajno prebivališče, če pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, od njega zahteva, da na pristojnem sodišču začne poseben sodni postopek, npr. postopek za popis dediščine.
(14a) It should not be possible for a person who wishes to limit his liability for the debts under the succession to do so by a mere declaration to that effect before the courts or other competent authorities of the Member State of his habitual residence where the law applicable to the succession requires him to initiate specific legal proceedings, for instance inventory proceedings, before the competent court .