natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker sta Evropski parlament in Svet sprejela zakonodajne instrumente za izvajanje Stockholmske konvencije2 Uredba (ES) št. 850/2004 z dne 29.4.2004 o obstojnih organskih onesnaževalcih, ki spreminja Direktivo 79/117/ES; Uredba (ES) št. 304/2003 z dne 28.1.2003 o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij; Direktiva Sveta 96/59/ES z dne 16.9.1996 odstranjevanju polikloriranih bifenilov in polikloriranih terfenilov (PCB/PCT). in s tem pokazala svojo zavezanost za kar največjo možno odpravo obstojnih organskih onesnaževalcev,
whereas the European Parliament and the Council have adopted the legislative instruments to implement the Stockholm Convention Regulation (EC) No 850/2004 of 29.4.2004 on persistent organic pollutants and amending Directive 79/117/EC; Regulation (EC) No 304/2003 of 28.1.2003 concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals; Council Directive 96/59/EC of 16.9.1996 on the disposal of polychlorinated biphenyls and polychlorinated terphenyls (PCB/PCT). and thereby demonstrated the commitment to eliminate persistent organic pollutants as far as possible,
ker bo prva konferenca podpisnic pripravila podlago za prihodnje konference podpisnic (COP) in ker se bo na COP-1 razpravljalo in odločalo o številnih pomembnih temah,
whereas the first Conference of the Parties will prepare the ground for future COPs and whereas a large number of important topics will be discussed and decided upon at COP-1,
ker Konvencija ni statičen zakonodajni instrument, ampak zagotavlja mehanizem za dodajanje novih vsebin,
whereas the Convention is not a static legislative instrument, but provides for a mechanism to add new substances,
poziva EU, da prevzame aktivno vlogo pri pogajanjih v okviru uspešnega sodelovanja med Komisijo, Svetom in Parlamentom;
Urges the EU to take an active role in the negotiations by means of effective cooperation between the Commission, the Council and Parliament;
meni, da je konferenca dobra priložnost za postavitev ambicioznih ciljev za sprejetje predvidenih ukrepov, zlasti za odpravo proizvodnje, trženja in uporabe namerno proizvedenih obstojnih organskih onesnaževalcev;
Believes that the Conference will provide a good opportunity to set ambitious targets for taking measures designed in particular to eliminate the production, placing on the market and use of intentionally produced persistent organic pollutants;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da zagotovijo učinkovito izvajanje sklepov, sprejetih na COP-1, in nadaljnji razvoj Konvencije kot tudi skladnost teh sklepov z okoljskimi cilji Skupnosti ter cilji njene razvojne politike in zakonodaje;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the decisions taken at COP-1 ensure effective implementation and further development of the Convention, as well as coherence of those decisions with the Community's environmental and development policy objectives and legislation;
da je razširitev posebne oprostitve na substance, naštete v Prilogi A, dovoljena le v izjemnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih;
(a) specific exemptions of substances listed in Annex A are granted only in exceptional and well-justified cases;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da zagotovijo pravično teritorialno zastopanost EU v Odboru za pregled POP, kot je bilo sklenjeno v Rotterdamski konvenciji;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure equitable geographical representation of the EU in the POPs Review Committee, as has been achieved under the Rotterdam Convention;
meni, da mora biti Globalni sklad za okolje še naprej najpomembnejši subjekt, zadolžen za upravljanje s finančnim mehanizmom, predvsem za podporo najmanj razvitim državam pri doseganju zastavljenih ciljev;
Believes that the Global Environment Facility should continue to be the principal entity entrusted with the operation of the financial mechanism, mainly by supporting LDCs in achieving the established goals;
meni, da je treba pri izvajanju določb Rotterdamske, Stockholmske in Baselske konvencije na ravni Skupnosti ter pri sodelovanju v razvoju strateškega pristopa k mednarodnemu upravljanju s kemikalijami („Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management“ ali SAICM) v okviru OZN zagotoviti usklajenost in povezanost;
Believes that coordination and coherence need to be ensured when implementing at Community level the provisions of the Rotterdam, Stockholm and Basel Conventions and when participating in the development of the Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) within the United Nations framework;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da oblikujejo ustrezne smernice za pripravo nacionalnih izvedbenih načrtov; poziva države, ki tega še niso storile, da kar najhitreje oblikujejo svoje nacionalne izvedbene načrte;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to establish appropriate guidance for the elaboration of national implementation plans; urges those States which have not yet done so to develop their national implementation plans as soon as possible;
meni, da morajo poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, ki so v delegaciji ES, prispevati pomemben delež in zato pričakuje, da bodo imeli vsaj na podlagi statusa opazovalca (z ali brez pravice do govora) dostop do usklajevalnih sestankov EU v Punti del Este;
Believes that the Members of the European Parliament who are part of the EC delegation have an essential contribution to make and expects, therefore, that they will have access to EU coordination meetings in Punta del Este, on the basis of at least observer status, with or without speaking rights;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, sekretariatu Programa Združenih narodov za okolje, z zahtevo, da se razdeli vsem podpisnicam, ki niso članice EU.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretariat of the United Nations Environment Programme, with the request that it be circulated to all non-EU contracting parties.
o osnutku sklepa Komisije, ki spreminja prilogo k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, da bi jo prilagodila tehničnemu napredku (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642)
on the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o osnutku sklepa Komisije, ki spreminja prilogo k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, da bi jo prilagodila tehničnemu napredku (CMT-2005-151 in CMT-2005-642),
European Parliament resolution on the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642)
ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/95/ES UL L 37, 13.2.2003, str.
having regard to European Parliament and Council Directive 2002/95/EC OJ L 37, 13.2.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Komisije, ki spreminja prilogo k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, da bi jo prilagodila tehničnemu napredku (CMT-2005-151 in CMT-2005-642),
having regard to the draft Commission decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (CMT-2005-151 and CMT-2005-642),
ob upoštevanju mnenja z dne 16.marca 2005, ki ga je podal odbor, omenjen v členu 7 zgoraj omenjene Direktive,
having regard to the opinion delivered on 16 March 2005 by the committee referred to in Article 7 of the above directive,
ob upoštevanju člena 8 Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
having regard to Article 8 of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
23 in Sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo glede načina izvajanja Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES UL L 256,10.10.2000, str.
23. , and the Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission on procedures for implementing Council Decision 1999/468/EC OJ L 256,10.10.2000, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 95(3) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 95(3) of the EC Treaty,
ker člen 4 (1) Direktive 2002/95/ES prepoveduje uporabo svinca, živega srebra, kadmija, šestvalentnega kroma, polibromiranih bifenolov (PBB) in polibromiranih difeniletrov (PBDE) v novi električni in elektronski opremi, ki bo dana v promet po 1. juliju 2006, razen če je v prilogi predvidena kot izjema,
whereas Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC restricts the use of lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE) in new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market from 1 July 2006 unless exempted under the Annex,
ker je odbor, ki je naveden v členu 7 Direktive 2002/95/ES, 10. decembra 2004 izglasoval osnutek sklepa Komisije o spremembi priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES, zato da bi dodal nove izjeme in spremenil obstoječe,
whereas, on 10 December 2004, the committee established under Article 7 of Directive 2002/95/EC voted in favour of a draft Commission Decision to amend the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC in order to add new exemptions and modify existing ones,
ker člen 7(3) Sklepa o postopku v odboru in člen 1 Sporazuma določata, da Evropski parlament "istočasno in pod enakimi pogoji, kot veljajo za člane odborov, prejema osnutke dnevnega reda sej odborov, osnutke izvedbenih ukrepov, ki so odborom predloženi ... izide glasovanja in sklepne beležke sej ter sezname organov, katerim osebe, ki so jih države članice imenovale za predstavnike, pripadajo",
whereas Article 7(3) of the Comitology Decision and Article 1 of the Agreement provide that the European Parliament 'is to receive, at the same time as the members of the committees and on the same terms, the draft agendas for committee meetings, the draft implementing measures submitted to the committees... and the results of voting and summary records of the meetings and lists of the authorities to which the persons designated by Member States to represent them belong',
ker je Evropski parlament osnutek sklepa, do katerega je upravičen v skladu s Sklepom o postopku v odboru, prejel šele 28. januarja 2005 in zgolj na zahtevo,
whereas Parliament received the draft decision by virtue of its right of scrutiny pursuant to the Comitology Decision only on 28 January 2005 and only upon request,
ker Evropski parlament do tega dne ni prejel skoraj nobenega od dokumentov, ki bi jih moral v zvezi z zasedanji odbora za prilagoditev zakonodaje ES o odpadkih znanstenemu in tehničnemu napredku v letu 2004,
whereas, by that date, Parliament had received almost none of the documents that it should have received in relation to the meetings of the committee for the adaptation to scientific and technical progress of EC legislation on waste in the course of 2004,
ker je odgovorni parlamentarni odbor Komisijo dne 3. februarja 2005 opozoril, da ni upoštevala Sklepa o postopku v odboru in Sporazuma; ker se je Komisija zavezala, da bo uvedla nov komitološki postopek in 16. februarja 2005 predložila vse manjkajoče dokumente,
whereas the committee responsible in Parliament raised the Commission's non-compliance with the Comitology Decision and the Agreement with the Commission on 3 February 2005; whereas the Commission undertook to start a new comitology procedure and to submit all the missing documents on 16 February 2005,
ker je Evropski parlament 25. februarja 2005 prejel nov osnutek sklepa,
whereas Parliament received a new draft decision on 25 February 2005,
ker člen 5(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES dovoljuje spremembe, potrebne za prilagoditev priloge znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku,
whereas Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC allows for amendments necessary to adapt the Annex to scientific and technical progress,
ker obstajajo ali že razvijajo varnejše alternative nevarnim snovem, navedenim v členu 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES, za področje uporabe, ki trenutno predstavljajo izjeme,
whereas safer alternatives to the hazardous substances covered by Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are available or being developed for applications that currently benefit from an exemption,
ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES določa, da je treba "izvzeti materiale in komponente električne in elektronske opreme iz člena 4(1), če je tehnično ali znanstveno neizvedljivo, da se jih odstrani ali nadomesti s spremembo konstrukcije ali z materiali in komponentami, ki ne zahtevajo katerega od materialov ali snovi iz tega člena, ali kadar bi negativni vplivi na okolje, zdravje in/ali varnost potrošnika, ki bi jih povzročila nadomestitev, utegnili prevladati nad prednostmi za okolje, zdravje in/ali varnostjo potrošnika",
whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for 'exempting materials and components of electrical and electronic equipment from Article 4(1) if their elimination or substitution via design changes or materials and components which do not require any of the materials or substances referred to therein is technically or scientifically impracticable, or where the negative environmental, health and/or consumer safety impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the environmental, health and/or consumer safety benefits thereof',
ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES predstavlja edino merilo, ki ga je mogoče upoštevati pri pripravi osnutka sklepa o dodatnih izjemah;
whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides the sole criteria that can be taken into consideration with a view to preparing a draft decision for additional exemptions,
ker Komisija v uvodni izjavi 2 svojega osnutka sklepa trdi, da je uporaba teh nevarnih snovi v navedenih specifičnih materialih in sestavnih delih še vedno neizogibna,
whereas the Commission asserts in recital 2 of its draft decision that the 'use of these hazardous substances in those specific materials and components is still unavoidable',
ker se mora Komisija v skladu s členom 5(2) Direktive 2002/95/ES pred spreminjanjem Priloge med drugim posvetovati z zainteresiranimi stranmi in "poročati o prejetih podatkih";
whereas, pursuant to Article 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC, the Commission shall inter alia consult stakeholders before amending the Annex and 'shall provide an account of the information it receives',
ker so se pri pregledu posvetovanj zainteresiranih strani pokazale naslednje težave:
whereas scrutiny of the stakeholder consultation revealed the following problems:
pri posvetovanju zainteresiranih strani so bili upoštevani stroškovni dejavniki, čeprav jih Direktiva 2002/95/ES ne vsebuje; ker neprimerno posvetovanje o stroških zbuja dvom v podlago za osnutek sklepa,
∙ cost considerations were included in the stakeholder consultation, although Directive 2002/95/EC does not include cost considerations; whereas the undue consultation about costs raises doubts about the basis of the draft decision,
glavna razlika med datumi prenehanja veljavnosti, ki so jasen znak za gospodarske subjekte, ter splošno klavzulo o pregledu, ki je po naravi odprta, ni bila razumljena; ker splošne klavzule o pregledu ni mogoče izenačiti z nedvoumnimi datumi prenehanja veljavnosti,
∙ the major difference between expiry dates providing a clear signal to economic operators and a general review clause which is open by nature is not understood; whereas a general review clause cannot be considered to be equal to clear expiry dates,
dovoljeno so bile izjeme, čeprav so na voljo nadomestne snovi (točka 7 (druga alinea), 10, 12, 13 in 14), kar je v nasprotju s členom 5(1)(b),
∙ exemptions have been provided where substitutes are available (item 7 (second indent), 10, 12, 13 and 14), contrary to Article 5(1)(b),
datum prenehanja veljavnosti za točko 7 (druga alinea), namreč leto 2010, je bil črtan brez utemeljitve,
∙ the expiry date for item 7 (second indent) of 2010 was removed with no justification,
datumi prenehanja veljavnosti, ki so jih vlagatelji predlagali za številne točke, niso bili vključeni (točke 10, 11, 13, 14),
∙ expiry dates suggested on a number of items by the applicants themselves have not been included (items 10, 11, 13, 14),
na podlagi omejenih podatkov, ki jih ima na razpolago, meni, da Komisija ni ravnala v skladu s členi 5(1), 5(1)(b) in 5(2) Direktive 2002/95/ES ter zaradi tega prekoračila izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena v tej direktivi;
Considers, on the basis of the limited information available, that the Commission has not acted in accordance with Article 5(1), 5(1)(b) and 5(2) of Directive 2002/95/EC and has therefore exceeded the implementing powers provided for in this directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno preuči svoj osnutek sklepa, ki spreminja prilogo k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi, da bi jo prilagodila tehničnemu napredku ter zagotovi, da bodo vse spremembe Priloge popolnoma usklajene z določbami Direktive 2002/95/ES;
Calls on the Commission to re-examine its draft decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment in the light of this resolution, and to ensure that any amendment to the Annex fully respects the provisions of Directive 2002/95/EC;
potrjuje, da so naknadni pregledi drugih dokumentov o postopku v odboru pokazali, da neupoštevanje Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/EGS in Sporazuma s strani Komisije v smislu postopkovnih določb ni osamljen primer;
Confirms that subsequent scrutiny of other comitology files has revealed that the Commission's non-compliance with Council Decision 1999/468/EEC and the Agreement in terms of the procedural provisions is not an isolated case;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno oceni vse primere neizpolnjevanja Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/EGS in Sporazuma od spremembe postopkov s konca leta 2003 ter pri tem navede posamezni pravni akt in natančno obliko neupoštevanja, skupno oceno pa v treh mesecih predloži Parlamentu;
Calls on the Commission to make a detailed assessment of all cases of non-compliance with Council Decision 1999/468/EEC and the Agreement since the modification of the procedures at the end of 2003, specifying the act and the exact form of non-compliance, and to forward the full assessment to Parliament within 3 months;
poziva Komisijo, naj spoštuje pravico Parlamenta do podatkov in nadzora v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/EGS in Sporazumom;
Calls on the Commission to respect Parliament's right to information and scrutiny pursuant to Council Decision 1999/468/EEC and the Agreement;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, and the parliaments and governments of the Member States.
ki ga vlagajo Nirj Deva, Timothy Kirkhope, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Malcolm Harbour in John Purvis
by Nirj Deva, Timothy Kirkhope, Philip Bushill-Matthews, Malcolm Harbour and John Purvis
o vesoljski sondi Huygens
on the Huygens space probe
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o vesoljski sondi Huygens
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the Huygens space probe
ker je sonda Huygens iz Evropske vesoljske agencije uspešno pristala na Saturnovi luni Titanu in poslala pomembne, do sedaj neznane podatke o atmosferi, pokrajini in vremenu na tej luni;
whereas the European Space Agency's Huygens probe has successfully landed on Titan, a moon of Saturn, and communicated important, hitherto unknown information about Titan's atmosphere, landscape and weather,
upoštevajoč težave, ki jih je premagala misija Cassini-Huygens; prepotovala je namreč razdaljo 3,5 milijard milj, prestala težavne pospešitve hitrosti zaradi različnih gravitacijskih sistemov treh planetov, prenesla temperaturo 8000°C, premostila zamik pri prenosu navodil v času vstopanja v atmosfero Titana in potovala s hitrostjo 6 km/s;
noting the difficulties which the Cassini-Huygens mission overcame, covering a distance of 3.5 bn miles, undertaking difficult speed boosts from three planets' gravitational systems, contending with a temperature of 8000° C and a delay in relay time for instructions whilst entering into Titan's atmosphere, and travelling at a speed of 6 km/sec.,
ker je pristanek, ki je omogočil več kot 90 minut prenosa podatkov, presegel pričakovanja znanstvenikov;
observing that the landing exceeded scientists' expectations, with over 90 minutes' data transmission.
ker do sedaj na Saturnovi luni ni pristalo še nobeno vesoljsko plovilo;
whereas nobody has ever before landed a spacecraft on a moon of Saturn,
ker je NASA čestitala Evropski vesoljski agenciji za to „zmago na področju tehniških ved in znanosti“;
whereas NASA congratulated ESA on this 'engineering and scientific victory',
ob upoštevanju sodelovanja britanskih univerz in podjetij: sondo je izdelala univerza „The Open University“, medtem ko sta „Imperial College London“ in „Leicester University“ sodelovala pri izgradnji poskusnih naprav; podjetje „LogicaCMG“ je izdelalo letalsko programsko opremo, „Meggitt Aerospace“ cevi za gorivo, „John Heathcote and Company“ pa visoko odporen material za padala;
noting the involvement of British universities and companies: the Open University built the probe, whilst Imperial College London and Leicester University helped build experimental devices; LogicaCMG manufactured flight software, Meggitt Aerospace made fuel hoses and John Heathcote and Company produced high-tensile parachute fabric,
poziva Komisijo, da uradno čestita ekipi za njene dosežke.
Requests that the Commission officially congratulate the team on its achievements;
o boju proti pohabljanju ženskih spolnih organov
on combating female genital mutilation
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o boju proti pohabljanju ženskih spolnih organov
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on combating female genital mutilation
ker vsako leto približno 2 milijona deklic tvega, da bo žrtev pohabljanja spolnih organov,
whereas every year more than 2 million young girls are likely to be subjected to sexual mutilation,
ker je program DAPHNE I uvrstil pohabljanje spolnih organov med svoje prednostne naloge za obdobje dveh zaporednih let in ker program DAPHNE II predvideva sredstva v višini 50 milijonov evrov za boj proti nasilju nad otroki, mladimi in ženskami,
whereas the DAPHNE I programme made genital mutilation one of its priorities for two consecutive years and the DAPHNE II programme earmarks EUR 50 million to combating violence against children, young people and women,
- izdajo direktive, ki prepoveduje prakso pohabljanja ženskih spolnih organov;
- a directive should be issued banning the practice of female genital mutilation,
- pripravo pobud za pravilno osveščanje o problemu, zlasti z namenom zagotoviti podporo priseljencem, ki prihajajo iz držav, v katerih vlada strpnost glede teh navad ali so le-te celo dovoljene;
- initiatives be drawn up for proper education on the subject, in particular in order to provide support for immigrants coming from countries where such customs are tolerated and even considered lawful,