natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da obstaja potreba po patentu in blagovni znamki Skupnosti in po izboljšanju vzajemnosti med evropskim, ameriškim in japonskim patentnim sistemom; poudarja, da mora biti celovit patentni sistem Skupnosti, ki temelji na demokratičnih pravnih standardih, del strategije za inovacije, s katero je treba zagotoviti ravnotežje med varstvom industrijske lastnine, širjenjem tehničnega znanja ter svobodno in neomejeno konkurenco; poudarja, da je namen varstva, ki ga zagotavlja patent, zaščita inovacije in ne nadzor tržnih sektorjev;
Notes the need for a Community patent and trademark, and for improved reciprocity between the European, United States' and Japanese patent systems; stresses that an integrated Community patent system based on democratic legal standards must be part of an innovation strategy, in which it is essential to ensure a balance between protection of industrial property, dissemination of technical knowledge and free and unrestricted competition; underlines that the purpose of the protection provided by a patent is the safeguarding of an invention and not the controlling of market sectors;
poziva Svet, naj omogoči prosto pot za dokončno oblikovanje osnutka evropskega patenta glede jezikovne ureditve;
Asks the Council to end the stalemate over the proposed Community patent as far as the language regime is concerned;
opozarja Komisijo in države članice na nedavne spremembe na področju varstva in širjenja znanstvenega znanja in izkušenj, na uspeh objavljenih in javno dostopnih strokovnih presoj ter na licenco "skupna znanstvena lastnina";
Draws the attention of the Commission and the Member States to the recent changes concerning the protection and dissemination of scientific know-how, to the success of scientific reviews published with free access and to the "Science Commons" licence;
nujno poziva države članice, naj pripomorejo k vzpostavljanju tesnejših stikov med inštituti za uporabne raziskave in industrijo, inkubatorji in sorodnimi znanstvenimi ali industrijskimi parki ter jim s tem omogočijo doseganje kritične mase;
Urges Member States to help put institutes for applied research in closer contact with industry, incubators and neighbouring science or industrial parks, enabling them to achieve critical mass;
ugotavlja, da ključni evropski sektorji še naprej trpijo zaradi slabe usklajenosti in povezanosti, ozkih grl ter slabega upravljanja znanja; ugotavlja, da bi večja udeležba MSP v evropskih tehnoloških platformah pripomogla k reševanju teh vprašanj;
Notes that key European sectors continue to suffer from poor coordination and integration, bottlenecks, and poor knowledge management; notes that more SME involvement in European technology platforms would help address these issues;
poudarja potrebo, da se raziskovalce podpre pri dostopanju do financiranja v začetni fazi, s čimer bi pridobili sredstva za dejavnosti, ki imajo za cilj vlagateljem dokazati, da lahko nova tehnologija komercialno in tehnično preživi na določeni ravni;
Stresses the need to support researchers in accessing pre-seed financing which would enable them to fund activities aimed at proving to investors that a new technology has a certain level of commercial and technical viability;
izraža zaskrbljenost, da bodo kljub dejstvu, da ima spodbujanje tehnoloških raziskav in inovacij na evropski ravni ključni pomen, rezultati, doseženi v Evropski uniji, omejeni na ravni financiranja, izvajanja in izrabe zmogljivosti;
Expresses its concern that, even if the vital importance of promoting technological research and innovation is recognised at European level, results obtained within the EU will be limited in terms of funding, performance and capacity utilisation;
poudarja potrebo po bolj razvitem sistemu javno-zasebnih partnerstev, da se z zagotavljanjem sodobne opreme, infrastrukture in storitev izboljša kakovost raziskav;
Stresses the need for a more developed system of public-private partnerships to improve the quality of research by providing up-to-date equipment, infrastructure and services;
pozdravlja pomembno vlogo poslovnih angelov pri zagotavljanju naložb za inovativna podjetja, zlasti MSP, ki bi bile sicer zanje nedosegljive;
Welcomes the important role of business angels in providing otherwise unavailable investment to innovative firms, especially SMEs;
ugotavlja, da ekološke inovacije, zlasti metode za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti, zagotavljajo konkurenčne prednosti za evropska podjetja;
Notes that eco-innovation, in particular methods of boosting energy efficiency, offers competitive advantages to European companies;
ugotavlja, da posojila in nepovratna sredstva, ki so rezultat posamičnih pogajanj in pri katerih se oblika finančnega instrumenta določi v tesnem stiku s strankami, vodijo k učinkoviti porabi sredstev v smislu obsega in časa trženja, ki je osredotočen na dejanske potrebe;
Notes that individually negotiated loans and grants, where the precise form of the instrument is determined in close contact with customers, will lead to the effective use of funds in terms of volume and time-to-market, focused on real needs;
ugotavlja, da je za ustvarjanje, rast, spodbujanje ter združevanje raziskav in inovacij med novimi podjetniško naravnanimi družbami potreben ustrezen tvegani kapital;
Notes that adequate venture capital is necessary for the creation, growth, boosting and bringing together of research and innovation amongst new entrepreneurial firms;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami MSP zagotovi strukturno pomoč, ki jim bo omogočila boljše upravljanje znanj in tehnoloških virov, dejavnejšo vlogo na inovacijskem trgu, ki ga narekuje povpraševanje, ter aktivno vključevanje v tehnološke raziskave in razvoj;
Urges the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to provide SMEs with a framework of structural assistance to upgrade their knowledge management and technological resources, enabling them to play an active role in a demand-led innovation market and become actively involved in technological research and development;
opaža, da je potrebno MSP omogočiti boljši dostop do financiranja;
Observes that it is necessary to provide SMEs with improved access to funding;
podpira zamisel, ki jo je v marcu 2006 potrdil Evropski svet v Bruslju in ki se nanaša na lažji in širši dostop do posojil Evropske investicijske banke za poslovne subjekte, še zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, ki še najbolj potrebujejo spodbudo na področju inovacij in raziskav;
Supports the idea, endorsed by the March 2006 Brussels European Council, of easier and wider access to loans from the European Investment Bank for businesses, particularly SMEs which are most in need of encouragement in the field of innovation and research;
predlaga, da se na strukturne sklade gleda kot na ključno sredstvo za podporo raziskovalnim in inovacijskim zmogljivostim, zlasti v prizadevanjih za kohezijo; predlaga, da se potroji znesek iz strukturnih skladov, ki je namenjen raziskavam in inovacijam;
Proposes that structural funds should be seen as a key means of supporting research and innovation capacity, especially in the pursuit of cohesion; proposes a trebling of the amount of structural funds to be spent on research and innovation;
ugotavlja, da je uporaba javnih naročil za spodbujanje raziskav in inovacij ključnega pomena, vendar ta ne bi smela izkrivljati konkurence ali dajati prednosti pomembnejšim akterjem na trgu;
Notes that using public procurement to foster research and innovation is key but that it should not distort competition or favour major market players;
meni, da javnih naročil ne bi smeli omejevati na spodbujanje zasebnega vlaganja, ampak bi ta morala igrati strateško vlogo ter pritegniti podjetja k spodbujanju inovacij in pridobivanju novega znanja;
Considers that public procurement should not be limited to providing private investment inducements but should play a strategic role, inspiring companies to promote innovation and acquire fresh know-how;
priznava, da je lahko mrežno povezovanje MSP z večjimi izvajalci tako iz zasebnega kot iz javnega sektorja pomembno za spodbujanje inovacij; poudarja, da lahko javna naročila inovativnih izdelkov tako na državni ravni kot na ravni Skupnosti pomaga zapolniti vrzeli na trgu ter spodbudi inovativne izdelke in storitve na sploh;
Recognises, that networking between SMEs and large contractors from both the private and the public sector can play an important role in reinforcing innovation; emphasises that public provision of innovative products at both national and Community level can help to fill gaps in the market and promote innovative products and services in general;
pozdravlja temeljito reformo pravil EU glede državne pomoči, ki preusmerja subvencije od velikih družb, ki so v težavah, k malim in inovativnim podjetjem;
Commends the sweeping reform of the EU's State aid rules, shifting subsidies from big, ailing companies to small and innovative businesses;
opaža, da sta prožnost in preglednost prvi pogoj za inovacije;
Notes that flexibility and transparency are prerequisites for innovation;
meni, da je treba najti široko paleto možnosti za zagotovitev naložb v raziskovalno opremo;
Considers it necessary to find a wider range of ways to secure investment in research equipment;
predlaga izvajanje sistema kreditiranja davkov, da se spodbudi storitveni sektor in se nameni pozornost rezultatom raziskav in izvajanju teh rezultatov;
Proposes the implementation of a tax credit system to encourage the service sector to take an interest in research findings and their implementation;
predlaga "strukturo enotnega sklada", da ne bi prihajalo do dvojne obdavčitve vlagateljev, ki imajo sedež v eni državi članici in preko sklada vlagajo v drugi državi članici;
Proposes a "single fund structure" to avoid the double taxation of investors located in one Member State investing through a fund in another;
poudarja, da je treba preveriti, ali so obstoječe strukture in mehanizmi s posebnim znanjem na področju inovacij primerni, da zagotovijo širok pristop do inovacij in njihovo spodbujanje s prispevanjem k boljšemu usklajevanju dejavnosti in politike;
Emphasises the need to examine whether the current structures and mechanisms with particular expertise in innovation are adequate to ensure a broad approach to innovation and able to promote it by contributing to a better coordination of action and policies;
poziva Svet, naj Evropskemu parlamentu letno poroča o trendu vlaganj iz nacionalnih proračunov v javni raziskovalni sektor (cilj je 1 % BDP);
Asks the Council to report annually to the European Parliament on the trends in investment from national budgets in public research (the objective being 1% of GDP);
ugotavlja, da cilj vlagati 3 % BDP EU v raziskave od danes do 2010 verjetno ne bo dosežen; obžaluje, da na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Bruslju marca 2006 države članice niso sprejele konkretnejših obveznosti v korist raziskav in inovacij; obžaluje tudi, da niso zastavile minimalnega cilja povečanja javne pomoči za leto 2010;
Notes that the objective of investing 3% of EU GDP in research by 2010 will probably not be achieved; regrets that at the March 2006 Brussels European Council the Member States did not make firmer commitments in favour of research and innovation; regrets that they did not fix a minimum target for increasing public aid in 2010;
meni, da lahko instrumenti Skupnosti, kot so strategija i2010, sedmi okvirni program za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti ter Okvirni program za konkurenčnost in inovacije, prispevajo k zmanjševanju vrzeli med rezultati raziskav in finančnimi koristmi;
Believes that Community instruments such as the i2010 strategy, the seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities and the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme can contribute to bridging the gap between research findings and financial gain;
poudarja, da morata izboljšani raziskovalna in inovacijska politika preko trajnostnega razvoja prispevati k novim možnostim zaposlovanja, s tem da se usmerita na ekološke inovacije in trajnostno proizvodnjo (npr. sončne-vodikove tehnologije, vetrno energijo, gorivne celice, biomaso, rastlinsko kemično industrijo), na ekološko učinkovite storitve (ohranjanje energije, storitve mobilnosti, ponovno uporabo in recikliranje) ter na metode trajnostnega inženiringa in upravljanja (npr. bioniko, celovito politiko proizvodov);
Stresses that improved research and innovation policies must contribute to new employment opportunities through sustainable development, with a focus on eco-innovation and sustainable production (e.g. solar-hydrogen technologies, wind energy, fuel cells, biomass, plant based chemical industry), eco-efficient services (energy conservation, mobility services, re-use and recycling) and sustainable engineering and management methods (e.g. bionics, Integrated Product Policy);
pozdravlja priporočilo Komisije, da mora v okviru pobude za "boljše predpise'ocena vpliva vključevati oceno učinkov priporočil na področju raziskav in inovacij;
Welcomes the Commission's recommendation that within the framework of the "Better Regulation" initiative, the impact assessment should include assessments of the effects of recommendations in the field of research and innovation;
poziva države članice, naj bolje uporabljajo evropska sredstva, ki so jim dodeljena, in opozarja na tiste države članice, ki so ustvarjanju delovnih mest namenile osrednjo vlogo v svojih projektih z vlaganjem več kot 35 % sredstev Evropskega socialnega sklada v posodobitev svojih sistemov za izobraževanje in usposabljanje;
Calls on the Member States to make better use of the European funds allocated to them and draws attention to those Member States which have put job creation at the heart of their plans by investing more than 35% of the appropriations from the European Social Fund in the modernisation of their education and training systems;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and to the governments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o političnem okviru za krepitev proizvodnje EU – za celovitejši pristop k industrijski politiki ( 2006/2003(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on a policy framework to strengthen EU manufacturing - towards a more integrated approach for industrial policy ( 2006/2003(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Politični okvir za krepitev proizvodnje EU – za celovitejši pristop k industrijski politiki" ( KOM(2005)0474 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled 'Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A policy framework to strengthen EU manufacturing - towards a more integrated approach for industrial policy' ( COM(2005)0474 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov osebja Komisije, ki spremljajo to sporočilo ( SEK(2005)1215 , SEK(2005)1216 in SEK(2005)1217 ),
having regard to the Commission Staff Working Documents accompanying that communication ( SEC(2005)1215 , SEC(2005)1216 and SEC(2005)1217 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta EU za konkurenčnost z dne 28. novembra 2005,
having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 28 November 2005,
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 23. in 24. marca 2006,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 23 and 24 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora k zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije (INT/288 - CESE 595/2005),
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee to the aforementioned Commission communication (INT/288 – CESE 595/2006),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0206/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0206/2006 ),
ker je v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije, izdelanem na podlagi podrobne preučitve konkurenčnosti 27 posameznih sektorjev, predviden industrijsko politični delovni program proizvodnje v prihodnjih letih,
whereas the abovementioned Commission communication outlines, on the basis of a detailed screening of the competitiveness of 27 individual sectors, a work programme for industrial policy in manufacturing industries for the coming years,
ker so dinamična in visoko konkurenčna industrija ter visoki socialni in okoljski standardi prvine evropskega modela gospodarskega razvoja,
whereas a dynamic and highly competitive industrial sector and high social and environmental standards are the ingredients of the European model of economic development,
ker proizvodna industrija EU zagotavlja približno 20 % proizvodnje EU in zaposluje približno 34 milijonov ljudi, od katerih več kot polovica dela v malih in srednje velikih podjetjih (MSP),
whereas the EU manufacturing industry provides around 20% of EU output and employs some 34 million people more than half of which work in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs),
ker Svet priznava, da je proizvodna industrija pomembna za ustvarjanje novih in inovativnih izdelkov,
whereas the Council recognises the importance of the manufacturing industry as a generator of new and innovative products,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije, v katerem sta določena politični okvir in razširjeni delovni program proizvodne industrije v prihodnjih letih; meni, da je sporočilo pomemben temeljni kamen za oblikovanje trdne in uravnotežene industrijske politike, ki združuje konkretne sektorske ukrepe z medsektorskimi političnimi pobudami;
Welcomes the Commission communication, which sets out a policy framework and an enhanced work programme for the manufacturing industries for the coming years; considers this communication a major building-block for shaping a sound and balanced industrial policy by combining concrete sectoral actions with cross-sectoral policy initiatives;
priznava, da imajo proizvodne industrije v EU pomembno vlogo; poudarja, da so proizvodnja, storitve in trgovina v sodobnem poslovnem okolju močno in vse bolj povezane; zato močno podpira razvoj skladne industrijske politike na evropski ravni, ki bo sprejela izzive globalizacije;
Recognises the important role of the manufacturing industries in the EU; points out that manufacturing, services and trade are strongly and increasingly interlinked in the modern business environment; strongly supports, therefore, the development of a coherent industrial policy at European level to tackle the challenges of globalisation;
opozarja, da mora EU težiti k temu, da ostane industrijska velesila, namesto da se omeji zgolj na razvoj svojega sektorja storitev;
Recalls that the EU must aspire to remain a major industrial power, and not merely confine itself to developing its services sector;
meni, da bi si morala EU prizadevati za skupni razvoj strategij konkurenčnosti v sektorjih industrije in storitev ter spodbujati preverjeno prakso v podjetniškem okolju in podjetništvu, vključno z družbeno odgovornostjo podjetij in enakimi možnostmi moških in žensk;
Considers that the EU should take care to ensure the joint development of competitiveness strategies in the industrial and service sectors and promote good practice as regards the entrepreneurial environment and entrepreneurship, including corporate social responsibility and equal opportunities for men and women;
opozarja, da so cilji Lizbonske strategije minimalni cilji, k izpolnitvi katerih bi se morale države članice zavezati; ugotavlja, da več držav članic sprejelo nacionalno politiko za krepitev proizvodne industrije; verjame, da bi lahko posamezne nacionalne politike ovirale razvoj evropske industrijske politike in da bi večja usklajenost med ukrepi, ki jih sprejmejo države članice, in ukrepi Skupnosti lahko oboje okrepila; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj z vključevanjem vlad, industrije in zainteresiranih strani na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni izdelajo mehanizem za učinkovito usklajevanje ukrepov na tem področju;
Recalls that the objectives of the Lisbon strategy are minimum objectives which the Member States should commit themselves to upholding; notes that, recently, several Member States adopted national policies to strengthen manufacturing industries; believes that isolated national policies could hamper the development of a European industrial policy and that better coordination between actions taken by the Member States and Community actions could strengthen both; therefore urges the Commission and the Member States to devise mechanisms to effectively coordinate actions in this field, involving governments, industry and stakeholders at European, national and regional level;
ugotavlja, da brez vladnih ukrepov za industrijo ne bo mogoče vzpostaviti okvira, ki bi bil trden, zanimiv in bi zagotavljal pravno varnost; poudarja, da je delovanje sodobnega javnega sektorja bistveno za vzpostavljanje infrastrukture ter spodbujanju izobraževanja in inovacij;
Notes that, without government action, it will be impossible to establish a framework for industry which is stable and attractive and affords legal certainty; points out that the work of a modern public sector is vital for dealing with infrastructure and fostering both education and innovation;
meni, da mora politika Skupnosti za pomoč in podporo nacionalnim industrijskim politikam stremeti k razvoju evropskih vzorov odličnosti in pri tem ustvariti sinergijo med strokovnimi znanji, ki jih ponujajo lokalni trgi dela in raziskovalni centri, ne da bi zanemarila političnega in makroekonomskega okolja, usmerjenega v razvoj, ter kot sredstvo za krepitev naložb težiti k blaginji in kakovostnim delovnim mestom s pravicami; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je v sporočilu Komisije opredeljena evropska industrijska politika; vseeno poudarja, da ta pristop ne sme biti zgolj horizontalen, temveč bi se moral nanašati tudi na posamezne sektorje;
Considers that the Community policy of aid and support for national industrial policies must aim to develop European Flagships for Excellence, creating synergies between the skills of local labour markets and research centres, without neglecting a political and macroeconomic environment which is geared to development, and as a means of promoting greater investment and creating wealth and high-quality jobs with rights; welcomes the fact that the Commission communication gives a definition of a European industrial policy; stresses, however, that this approach must not be purely horizontal but that there is also a need to think in sector-specific terms;
opozarja Komisijo na potrebo po uvedbi ukrepov za varčevanje in učinkovito uporabo energije na vseh političnih področjih; ugotavlja, da so energetski stroški v mnogih industrijskih panogah pomemben dejavnik, in zato poziva Komisijo, naj kot del svoje industrijske politike glede tega predlaga posebne ukrepe in programe;
Reminds the Commission of the need to mainstream energy -saving and efficiency measures in all policy areas; notes that energy costs are a major factor in many industries and calls, therefore, on the Commission to propose specific measures and programmes in this respect as part of its industrial policy;