natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Svet se je sicer odločil, da evropskega naloga za prijetje ne bo povezal s schengenskim območjem, vendar se je strinjal, da bi bilo koristno, če bi glede na njihovo privilegirano partnerstvo z državami članicami EU model postopka predaje uporabili za vse schengenske države.
Despite the decision not to link the European arrest warrant to Schengen, the Council agreed that it would be useful to apply the surrender procedure model to the Schengen countries, given their privileged partnership with the EU Member States.
Svet je pooblastil predsedstvo Sveta, da se z Norveško in Islandijo pogaja o sporazumih o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in postopkih predaje na podlagi členov 24 in 38 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
The Council authorised the Presidency of the Council to negotiate Agreements with Norway and Iceland on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and surrender procedures on the basis of Articles 24 and 38 of the Treaty on European Union.
Svet je sprejel splošni pristop o sporazumu o predaji 28. junija 2006, vendar sporazum še ni bil formalno sklenjen, saj v trenutku uveljavitve Lizbonske pogodbe postopek ratifikacije v državah članicah še ni bil zaključen, sedaj pa je treba uporabiti nov postopek iz člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU).
Council reached a general approach on the surrender agreement on 28 June 2006 but the agreement has not yet been formally concluded as at the moment of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon the ratification process by Member States was not finalised and the new procedure provided for by Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) has now to be applied.
Posledično lahko Svet sprejme sklep o sklenitvi sporazuma le po odobritvi Evropskega parlamenta.
As a consequence, the Council may adopt the decision concluding the agreement, only after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.
II - Vsebina sporazuma
II - Substance of the Agreement
Namen tega sporazuma je izboljšati postopek predaje zaradi uvedbe kazenskega postopka ali izvršitve kazni med državami članicami na eni strani ter Norveško in Islandijo na drugi strani z upoštevanjem določb Konvencije z dne 27. septembra 1996 o izročitvi med državami članicami EU kot minimalnih standardov.
This agreement is aimed at improving the surrender procedure between the Member States and Norway and Iceland for the purpose of the prosecution or execution of sentence, by taking account of the terms of the Convention of 27 September 1996 relating to extradition between the Member States of the EU as minimum standards.
V skladu z določbami sporazuma bodo pogodbenice zagotovile, da bo sistem izročitve zasnovan na mehanizmu predaje na podlagi naloga za prijetje.
In accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, the contracting parties will ensure that the extradition system will be based on a mechanism of surrender pursuant to an arrest warrant.
Nalog za prijetje se lahko izda za dejanja, ki se po pravu države izdajateljice kaznujejo z zaporno kaznijo ali ukrepom, vezanim na odvzem prostosti, za najmanj 12 mesecev ali, kadar sta kazen ali ukrep odvzema prostosti izrečena, za kazni do najmanj štirih mesecev.
An arrest warrant may be issued for acts punishable by the law of the issuing state by a custodial sentence or a detention order for a maximum period of at least 12 months or, where a sentence has been passed or a detention order has been made, for sentences of at least four months.
III - Stališče poročevalca
III - Your rapporteur's position
Kolikor ta sporazum le na zahtevo Norveške in Islandije širi na ti dve državi določbe, ki že veljajo med državami članicami, poročevalec ne vidi razloga, da bi temu nasprotoval.
Insofar as this agreement merely extends to Norway and Iceland - on request of these two countries - provisions that are already in place among EU Member States, your rapporteur does not see reasons to object.
Vendar meni, da je treba evropski nalog za prijetje ponovno preučiti, da se upošteva zaskrbljenost javnosti o možnih zlorabah ali pomanjkljivostih tega instrumenta.
However, he is of the opinion that the European Arrest Warrant must be the object of an evaluation in order to respond to public concerns on possible abuses or defects of this instrument.
Poročevalec je zlasti zaskrbljen zaradi težav, do katerih lahko pride zaradi delnega odstopa od načela dvojne kaznivosti.
In particular, your rapporteur expresses his concern on problems that the partial waiver on dual criminality may lead to.
Ta odstop iz člena 3(4) sporazuma ustvarja možnost za aretacijo in predajo za dejanja, ki niso kazniva v obeh vpletenih državah.
This waiver, as framed by Article 3(4) of the agreement, creates the possibility of arrest and surrender on practices that do not constitute a crime in both concerned countries.
Primer za to je možnost odstopa od dvojnega preverjanja v primerih „omogočanja nedovoljenega vstopa in bivanja“.
A case in point is the possibility to waive double-verification of criminality on "facilitation of unauthorised entry and residence".
Poročevalec meni, da bi stranke sporazuma morale omejiti tako odstopanje od preverjanja dvojne kaznivosti, v izogib aretacijam in predajam zaradi lažjih kaznivih dejanj.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that the agreeing parties should exercise restraint on such waivers of double-criminality verification, in order to avoid arrests and surrenders on minor offences.
Nazadnje poročevalec poudarja, da je treba napredovati na področju postopkovnih pravic, da bi imeli državljani na razpolago širok izbor pravic, ki bi sodile k uporabi evropskega naloga za prijetje, s čimer bi zajamčili spoštovanje državljanskih svoboščin in javno zaupanje v ta instrument.
Finally, your rapporteur emphasises the need to go further in the area of procedural rights, in order to provide citizens with a robust array of rights to go together with the use of the European Arrest Warrant, thus providing guaranties to civil liberties and public trust on this instrument.
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Alexander Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Mario Borghezio, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, baronica Sarah Ludford (Baroness Sarah Ludford), Monica Luisa Macovei, Véronique Mathieu, Nuno Melo, Jan Mulder, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Carmen Romero López, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Sonia Alfano, Alexander Alvaro, Roberta Angelilli, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Mario Borghezio, Rita Borsellino, Emine Bozkurt, Simon Busuttil, Philip Claeys, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Hélène Flautre, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Monica Luisa Macovei, Véronique Mathieu, Nuno Melo, Jan Mulder, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Georgios Papanikolaou, Carmen Romero López, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Renate Sommer, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Jean Lambert, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Hubert Pirker, Michèle Striffler, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Ioan Enciu, Monika Hohlmeier, Jean Lambert, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Mariya Nedelcheva, Hubert Pirker, Michèle Striffler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Cecilia Wikström
o enostranskih izjavah v zapisniku sej Sveta
on unilateral statements entered in the minutes of Council meetings
– ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika konference predsednikov odborov predsedniku Odbora za ustavne zadeve z dne 8. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the letter of 8 December 2009 from the Chair of the Conference of Committee Chairs to the Chair of its Committee on Constitutional Affairs,
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 22. decembra 1998 o skupnih smernicah za pripravo kakovostnih pravnih aktov Skupnosti
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 22 December 1998 on common guidelines for the quality of drafting of Community legislation
UL C 73, 17.3.1999, str.
OJ C 73, 17.3.1999, p.
– ob upoštevanju odgovorov Sveta in Komisije na pisni vprašanji P-3977/2010 in E-3981/2010 ,
– having regard to the answers by the Council and the Commission respectively to Written Question P-3977/2010 and E-3981/2010 ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0269/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0269/2011 ),
A. ker je Sodišče jasno in izključno pristojno, da odloča o razlagi primarnega in sekundarnega prava Unije,
A. whereas the Court of Justice has the clear and exclusive competence to rule on the interpretation of Union law, be it primary or secondary,
B. ker je Sodišče večkrat potrdilo, da izjave niso pravno zavezujoče,
B. whereas the Court of Justice has repeatedly confirmed that declarations are not legally binding,
C. ker je Svet zavezan, da v zakonodajnih postopkih Parlament celovito obvešča o svojem stališču
C. whereas the Council has the duty to inform Parliament fully of its position in the context of legislative procedures
Člen 294 PDEU (v prvi obravnavi). ,
Article 294 TFEU (at first reading). ,
D. ker so po Pogodbi institucije zavezane, da med seboj lojalno sodelujejo
D. whereas under the Treaty the institutions are required to practise mutual sincere cooperation
Člen 13 PEU. ,
Article 13 TEU. ,
E. ker bi lahko enostranske izjave držav članic ali Sveta neugodno učinkovale na zakonodajna pooblastila Parlamenta ter ker škodijo kakovosti pravnih aktov Unije in slabijo načelo pravne varnosti,
E. whereas unilateral statements by Member States or the Council might adversely affect Parliament’s legislative powers, are damaging to the quality of Union legislation and undermine the principle of legal certainty,
F. ker nobena izjava v zapisniku sej Sveta ali spravnega odbora ne more na kateri koli stopnji zakonodajnega postopka vnaprej določiti izid pogajanj med dvema vejama zakonodajne oblasti,
F. whereas no statement entered in the minutes of meetings of the Council or of the conciliation committee at any stage of the legislative procedure can pre-empt the outcome of negotiations between the two branches of the legislative authority,
4. poziva Svet, naj zapisnike o zakonodajnem delu svojih sej ne samo Parlamentu, temveč hkrati tudi nacionalnim parlamentom in vladam držav članic;
Calls on the Council to forward the minutes of the legislative part of its meetings to Parliament at the same time as to the national parliaments and Member State governments;
6. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj na podlagi člena 295 PDEU s Parlamentom začneta pogajanja za posodobitev skupne izjave o praktičnih ureditvah za postopek soodločanja (zdaj redni zakonodajni postopek), da bi se upoštevalo začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in jasno razmejilo področje uporabe enostranskih izjav;
Calls on the Council and Commission to enter into negotiations with Parliament, on the basis of Article 295 TFEU, with a view to updating the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure (now ordinary legislative procedure) in order to take account of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and to clearly delimit the scope of unilateral statements;
To poročilo je nastalo po tem, ko je konferenca predsednikov odborov na Odbor za ustavne zadeve naslovila zahtevo po pojasnitvi stališča Parlamenta glede pomena in pravnega statusa enostranskih izjav, vnesenih v zapisnik sej Sveta.
This report originates in a request by the Conference of Committee Chairs addressed to the Constitutional Affairs Committee in order to clarify the position of Parliament as regards the meaning and legal status of unilateral statements entered in the minutes of Council meetings.
Nekateri predsedniki odborov so izrazili pomisleke glede množičnosti takšnih izjav, zlasti v okviru postopka soodločanja, kjer bi lahko oslabili zakonsko moč in obseg uporabe sprejetih aktov, s tem pa vplivali na namen Parlamenta kot sozakonodajalca.
Several committee chairs expressed their concerns about the proliferation of such statements, in particular in the framework of the codecision procedure where they could weaken the legal force and scope of the adopted acts, and so possibly affect Parliament's will as a co-legislator.
S tem v zvezi je treba poudariti, da sporne izjave izvirajo zlasti iz posameznih držav članic ali majhnih skupin držav članic, saj so te pristojne za prenos zakonodajnih aktov na nacionalno raven.
It has to be stressed in this regard that the contentious statements are mainly originating from one or several Member States since they are in charge of the transposition of legislative acts at national level.
Če bi tem aktom skušali dati drugačno interpretacijo od tiste, ki sta jo sozakonodajalca dosegla v soglasju, bi dejansko izničili nujno usklajenost izvajanja zakonodaje Unije.
An attempt to interpret those acts in a way which could be divergent from the result achieved by common agreement of the two legislators would indeed undermine the necessary coherence of application of the Union law.
Izjave, ki jih dajo posamezne institucije, predsedstvo Sveta ali trojka predsedstev, se lahko uporabijo za zabeleženje dodatnih zavez ali za napoved nadaljnjih korakov.
Other statements when made by an institution as such or the Council Presidency or trio Presidency may reversely be useful to record parallel engagements or announce further steps.
Zato tudi Parlament včasih daje izjave in jih priloži sprejetim aktom (po potrebi skupaj z izjavami Sveta in/ali Komisije), ki so objavljeni v seriji C Uradnega lista Evropske unije.
It is why Parliament sometimes also make statements and attaches them to the acts it adopts (together when appropriate with statements by the Council and/or the Commission), which are published in series C of the Official Journal of the European Union.
Tudi glede na sodno prakso Sodišča se pri interpretaciji zakonskih aktov Unije ni mogoče zanašati na takšne enostranske izjave.
The case-law of the Court of Justice confirms that no reliance may be placed on such unilateral statements when it comes to interpret a Union legal act.
V ta namen jih je mogoče uporabiti le, če je njihova vsebina omenjena v besedilu ustreznega akta.
They may be used to this end only where reference is made to its content in the wording of the relevant act.
Zakonski akti bi morali biti samoumevni; vse potrebno za njihovo interpretacijo izhaja iz njihovega normativnega dela ali uvodnih izjav.
Indeed legal acts should be self-explanatory and any elements required for their interpretation flow from their enacting terms or recitals.
Parlament bi moral biti kot enakopraven sozakonodajalec s Svetom v celoti obveščen o vseh enostranskih izjavah držav članic, vnesenih v zapisnik sej Sveta, v kateri koli fazi zakonodajnega postopka.
As a co-legislator on an equal footing with the Council, Parliament should also be fully informed of any unilateral statements by the Members States entered in the minutes of the Council meetings and this all along the different stages of the legislative procedure.
Zdi se, da spremenjeni poslovnik Sveta vse od začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe omogoča neposreden prenos zapisnikov zakonodajnega dela sej Sveta vladam držav članic in nacionalnim parlamentom, Evropski parlament pa ni omenjen.
It appears that since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the amended Rules of Procedure of the Council provide for a direct transmission of the minutes of the legislative deliberations' part of Council meetings to both Member States' governments and national Parliaments, while no mention is made to the European Parliament.
Nacionalni parlamenti so tako bolje obveščeni kot Evropski parlament, čeprav je ta sozakonodajalec skupaj s Svetom.
This places the national Parliaments in a better position as far as information is concerned than the European Parliament, although the latter is co-legislator with the Council.
Poleg tega enostranskih izjav držav članic o zakonskih aktih ne bi smeli objavljati v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, saj s tem pridobijo na pomenu.
At the same time however and in order not to give them more significance, unilateral statements by Member States regarding legal acts should not be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Iz zgornjih navedb očitno sledi, da je treba posodobiti skupno izjavo o praktičnih ureditvah za postopek soodločanja, zato da bi se čim bolj izognili uporabi enostranskih izjav in da bi Svet Parlamentu omogočil dostop do vseh informacij v vseh fazah zakonodajnega postopka.
The preceding observations obviously call for an updating of the Joint Declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure in order to ensure that the recourse to unilateral statements is avoided as far as possible and that full information is provided by Council to Parliament at all stages of the legislative procedure.
Carlo Casini, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Daniel Hannan, Stanimir Ičhev (Stanimir Ilchev), Constance Le Grip, David Martin, Morten Messerschmidt, Paulo Rangel, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski, Luis Yáñez-Barnuevo García
Carlo Casini, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Daniel Hannan, Stanimir Ilchev, Constance Le Grip, David Martin, Morten Messerschmidt, Paulo Rangel, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, Søren Bo Søndergaard, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski, Luis Yáñez-Barnuevo García
o predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (vloga EGF/2011/000 TA 2011 – tehnična pomoč na pobudo Komisije)
on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2011/000 TA 2011 - technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission)
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA ZAPOSLOVANJE IN SOCIALNE ZADEVE.....................9
ANNEX: LETTER OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS....9
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2011)0358 – C7 0167/2011),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0358 – C7-0167/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0270/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0270/2011 ),
B. ker Komisija ESPG uporablja v skladu s splošnimi pravili iz Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti
B. whereas the Commission implement the Fund in accordance with the general rules set up by the Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities
1. , in v skladu z izvedbenimi pravili, ki se uporabljajo za to obliko izvrševanja proračuna,
1. and the implementing rules applicable to this form of implementation of the budget,
C. ker mora biti finančna pomoč Unije za presežne delavce dinamična ter na razpolago čim hitreje in na najučinkovitejši način v skladu s skupno izjavo Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, ki je bila sprejeta na spravnem sestanku 17. julija 2008, in ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 glede sprejetja sklepov za uporabo sredstev ESPG,
C. whereas the Union's financial assistance to workers made redundant should be dynamic and made available as quickly and efficiently as possible, in accordance with the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission adopted during the conciliation meeting on 17 July 2008, and having due regard for the IIA of 17 May 2006 in respect of the adoption of decision to mobilise the EGF,
D. ker se vsako leto na pobudo Komisije lahko uporabi znesek do višine 0,35 % ESPG za tehnično pomoč, in sicer za financiranje dejavnosti spremljanja, obveščanja, upravne in tehnične podpore, revizije, nadzora in vrednotenja, potrebne za izvajanje uredbe o ESPG, kot določa člen 8(1) navedene uredbe, vključno z zagotavljanjem informacij in usmerjanjem držav članic pri uporabi, spremljanju in ocenjevanju ESPG ter zagotavljanju informacij o uporabi ESPG evropskim in nacionalnim socialnim partnerjem (člen 8(4) uredbe o ESPG),
D. whereas up to 0.35% of the annual EGF amount can be made available each year for technical assistance at the initiative at the Commission, in order to finance monitoring, information, administrative and technical support, audit, control and evaluation activities necessary to implement the EGF Regulation, as stipulated in Article 8(1) of that Regulation, including the provision of information and guidance for the Member States in using, monitoring and evaluation the EGF and providing information on using the EGF to the European and national social partners (Article 8(4) of the EGF Regulation),
E. ker ima Komisija v skladu s členom 9(2) (Informacije in obveščanje javnosti) uredbe o ESPG nalogo vzpostaviti spletno mesto v vseh jezikih z informacijami o vlogah, pri čemer je poudarjena vloga proračunskega organa,
E. whereas, in accordance with Article 9(2), 'Information and publicity ', of the EGF Regulation, the Commission shall set up an internet site, available in all languages, to provide and diffuse information on applications, highlighting the role of the budget authority,
F. ker je na podlagi teh členov Komisija zahtevala, da se uporabijo sredstva sklada za njene upravne potrebe pri spremljanju izvajanja sklada ESPG in obveščanju o njem, pri oblikovanju zbirke znanja, ki bo omogočila hitrejše vloge in hitrejšo obravnavo, pri upravni in tehnični podpori, izmenjavi uspešnih praks med državami članicami ter vmesni oceni sklada,
F. whereas, on the basis of these articles, the Commission requested that the Fund be mobilised in order to cover its administrative needs for monitoring and information on the implementation of the EGF, creation of a knowledge base, which would allow applications and their processing to be speeded up, administrative and technical support, exchange of successful practices among the Member States and mid-term evaluation of the EGF,
G. ker vloga izpolnjuje merila za upravičenost do pomoči, določena v uredbi o ESPG,
G. whereas the application fulfils the eligibility criteria set up by the EGF Regulation,