natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi bilo zelo koristno, če bi na podlagi tega končnega dokumenta Komisije Ekonomsko-socialni svet začel primerjalno analizo in razpravo o ustreznih lastnostih sistemov, ki jih države članice uporabljajo za zagotovitev nadzora nad sredstvi, dodeljenimi iz proračuna Skupnosti;
Considers that it would be extremely useful for the Economic and Financial Affairs Council to use the final document drawn up by the Commission as the basis for a comparative analysis and a debate on the suitability of the systems used by Member States for control of the funds they receive from the Community budget;
ponovno opozarja na sporočilo Komisije z dne 15. junija 2005 o časovnem načrtu za integriran okvir notranje kontrole ( KOM(2005)0252 ), katere točka B določa, da "če država članica ne uspe ustrezno izpolniti svojih nalog v zvezi z obvladovanjem tveganja napake, Komisija zaščiti proračun EU s strogo uporabo obstoječih določb o ustavitvi plačil in finančnih popravkih".
Recalls the Commission's communication of 15 June 2005 on a roadmap to an integrated internal control framework ( COM(2005)0252 ), whose point B states: 'When a Member State fails to adequately address the risks of error, the Commission will protect the EC budget by rigorously applying the existing provisions for the suspension of payments and financial corrections';
v celoti podpira Komisijo pri strogem uveljavljanju zakonodaje na področju začasne ustavitve plačil in pozdravlja že začete ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se prenos sredstev ne izvede, če Komisija nima nobenih brezpogojnih zagotovil v zvezi z zanesljivostjo upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov držav članic, ki so upravičene do zadevnih sredstev;
Assures the Commission of its full support in the rigorous application of the legislation on suspension of payments, and welcomes the measures already initiated for the non-transfer of funds where the Commission does not have an absolute guarantee of the reliability of the management and control systems of the Member State which is the beneficiary of those funds;
ocenjuje, da bo na področju ponavljajočih se pridržkov, povezanih z načrti odhodkov določene države članice, začasna ustavitev plačil kot oblika pritiska prispevala k povečanju interesa držav članic za pravilno uporabo prejetih sredstev Skupnosti;
Believes that, in the case of recurrent reserves for expenditure programmes in a particular Member State, suspension of payments, as a means of pressure, will contribute to the greater involvement of the Member States in the correct use of Community funds received;
poziva Komisijo, da poenostavi pravila in uporabi obstoječo zakonodajo na področju začasne ustavitve plačil, ko je to potrebno, ter Svet, Parlament in Računsko sodišče pravočasno obvesti o zneskih teh začasnih ustavitvah plačil in razlogih zanje;
Calls on the Commission to simplify the rules and apply the existing legislation on suspension of payments in the cases where it is necessary, and to inform the Council, Parliament and the Court of Auditors in good time concerning the suspensions of payments and their results;
vztraja, da bi morala biti plačila sredstev v celoti ali deloma zaustavljena, če države članice ne izpolnjujejo osnovnih zahtev, kot v primeru sistema IACS v Grčiji, in če grške oblasti ne odpravijo obstoječih težav v predvidenem roku, kot določa akcijski načrt, ki so ga skupaj sprejele Komisija in grške oblasti in si prizadeva za vzpostavitev popolno delujočega sistema IACS;
Insists that payments should be fully or partly suspended in the case where Member States are not complying with basic requirements, as in the case of the IACS system in Greece, and where the Greek authorities do not remedy the existing problems within the time limits set, as scheduled by the jointly adopted action plan which the Commission has requested from the Greek authorities for a fully functioning IACS system;
meni, da različni standardi kontrole, ki jih uporabljajo posamezne države članice, škodujejo podobi EU;
Considers it detrimental for the image of the EU if individual Member States can apply different control standards;
meni, da bi morala Komisija na področju deljenega ali decentraliziranega upravljanja v celoti izvajati člen 53(5) Finančne uredbe, na podlagi katerega mora v skladu s členom 174 Pogodbe ES prevzeti končno odgovornost pri izvrševanju proračuna prek postopkov za potrditev obračuna ali mehanizmov finančnih popravkov;
Considers that, in the case of shared or decentralised management, the Commission should fully apply Article 53(5) of the Financial Regulation, thus assuming final responsibility for the execution of the budget, in line with Article 274 of the Treaty, by means of 'clearance-of-accounts procedures or financial correction mechanisms';
poudarja, da lahko Komisija ob upoštevanju večletne narave odhodkov v programih Skupnosti postopke za potrditev obračuna in mehanizme finančnih popravkov, katerih cilj je naknadno odpravljanje ugotovljenih napak, začne izvajati šele ob koncu večletnih ciklov, če je na voljo obsežna in jasno razumljiva dokumentacija o izvajanju projekta; nadalje poudarja, da je finančne popravke treba izvesti takoj, ko države članice zaznajo nepopravljene nepravilnosti, ne pa čakati na konec večletnega cikla;
Stresses that, given the multiannual character of expenditure in Community programmes, it is only at the end of a multiannual cycle that the Commission can proceed to the application of those 'clearance-of-accounts procedures or financial correction mechanisms', whose aim is the a posteriori rectification of errors detected, if comprehensive and clearly comprehensible documentation on programme implementation is available; further emphasises the need to undertake financial corrections as soon as uncorrected irregularities are detected by the Member States, without waiting for the end of the multiannual cycle;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da Sodišče izraža ostre kritike glede finančnih popravkov, ki jih izvaja Komisija in ki ne omogočajo "preprečevanja ter pravočasnega opredeljevanja in odpravljanja napak", ne upoštevajo dovolj pomanjkljivosti, ugotovljenih pri poslovnih dogodkih, torej na ravni končnega upravičenca, ter "držav članic ne spodbujajo k uvedbi ukrepov za preprečevanje nepravilnosti ali izboljšanje njihovih upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov"(točki 1.64 in 6.35 letnega poročila Računskega sodišča);
Notes with concern that the Court is extremely critical of the financial corrections applied by the Commission, which do not 'ensure the prevention and timely identification and correction of errors', do not take sufficient account of the deficiencies identified in the underlying operations, that is, at the level of the final beneficiary, and do not 'encourage Member States to take action to prevent irregularities or to improve their management and control systems' (paragraphs 1.64 and 6.35 of the Court of Auditors' annual report);
opozarja, da je cilj končnih odločb in popravnih ukrepov Potrditev obračunov v okviru Jamstvenega oddelka EKUJS, zapiranje operativnih programov strukturnih skladov in zaključevanje revizij v zvezi z decentraliziranim upravljanjem.
Notes that the objective of the final decisions and corrective measures Liquidation of accounts for the EAGGF (Guarantee), closure of the operational programmes under the Structural Funds, and completion of the audits for the decentralised management of external actions.
, da se iz financiranja Skupnosti izključijo odhodki, ki niso nastali v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, in da bi morale te odločbe, ki so v pristojnosti Komisije, predstavljati pomemben instrument v sistemih spremljanja in nadzora;
is to remove Community funding from expenditure which has not been carried out in conformity with Community rules, and that such decisions, which are a matter for the Commission, should constitute a major instrument in the control and monitoring systems;
meni, da končni popravni ukrepi, ki se ne uporabljajo neposredno za dejavnosti na ravni končnega upravičenca, glede na ugotovitve Sodišča v praksi povzročajo preusmeritev stroškov nezakonitih in nepravilnih poslovnih dogodkov iz proračuna Skupnosti k nacionalnim davkoplačevalcem in ne h končnemu upravičencu, ki je storil napako (točka 1.65 letnega poročila Računskega sodišča); ugotavlja, da imajo zato popravki le omejen preventiven in svarilen učinek na upravičence in upravitelje;
Notes that the final corrective measures, where they are not charged directly to the operations at the level of the final beneficiary, have the effect in practice - as the Court points out - of transferring the costs of illegal and irregular operations from the Community budget to national taxpayers as a whole, rather than to the final beneficiary who is responsible for the error (paragraph 1.65 of the Court of Auditors' annual report); notes that those corrections therefore have only a limited preventive and deterrent effect on beneficiaries and managers;
zato poudarja, da je zelo pomembno, da imajo države članice na voljo ustrezne sisteme za izboljšanje preprečevanja in opredeljevanja napak na ravni končnega upravičenca, kar bo odpravilo potrebo po izvajanju popravnih ukrepov s strani Komisije;
Stresses, therefore, the great importance of the Member States having appropriate systems for improving the prevention and identification of errors at the level of the final beneficiary, thus reducing the need for the Commission to apply final corrective measures;
ugotavlja, da mora načelo uspešne in učinkovite uporabe sredstev voditi v uspešno izterjavo; meni, da bi izboljšana izterjava dokazala učinkovitost kazni EU ter povečala verodostojnost evropskih institucij;
Notes that, as a result of the principle of efficient and effective use of appropriations, there must be effective recovery; takes the view that improved recovery would provide proof of the effectiveness of EU penalties and further boost the European institutions" credibility;
meni, da lahko uspešna izterjava poteka samo prek izvršilnih organov držav članic; zato poziva, da se pri izterjavi upošteva stroške držav članic v zvezi z njihovimi izvršilnimi organi;
Notes that effective recovery can only take place via the Member States" enforcement agencies; calls therefore, in connection with recovery, for Member States" costs for their enforcement agencies to be taken into account;
je prepričan, da je mogoče obseg izterjav izboljšati z objavo dolžnikov, ki so bili pravnomočno obsojeni in kljub temu niso pripravljeni poravnati svojih obveznosti;
Is convinced that an improvement in the recovery rate can be achieved by revealing the identities of debtors who have been found liable by the courts and can no longer appeal, but are unwilling to make payment;
ugotavlja, da mora Komisija ob upoštevanju resnih kritik Sodišča sprejeti vse ustrezne ukrepe, da se napake in nepravilnosti sploh ne bi pojavile, ter obžaluje, da Komisija očitno namenja več pozornosti mehanizmom za izvajanje končnih finančnih popravkov, ki imajo po mnenju Sodišča resne pomanjkljivosti in "jih ni mogoče opredeliti kot mehanizme, ki bodo preprečili in pravočasno zaznali ter popravili napake" (odstavek 1.64 letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča);
Concludes that the Commission, for its part and in the light of the Court's severe criticisms, needs to take all appropriate action in order to prevent errors and irregularities in occurring in the first place and regrets that the Commission apparently puts more emphasis on final financial correction mechanisms which, as the Court notes, have serious weaknesses and "cannot be regarded as mechanisms to ensure the prevention and timely identification and correction of errors" (paragraph 1.64 of the annual report of the European Court of Auditors);
poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu in Sodišču predstavi opredelitev, ki podrobno navaja različne pojme, zajete v izrazu "finančni popravki", in zneske dejansko izvedenih popravkov iz leta 2005;
Calls on the Commission to supply both Parliament and the Court of Auditors with an explicit definition of the different concepts grouped under the term 'financial correction mechanisms', as well as with the amounts actually involved in the corrections of 2005;
poziva Komisijo, da v prihodnje predstavi letno poročilo, v katerim bo naveden natančen znesek dejansko izvedenih finančnih popravkov;
Calls on the Commission to submit in future a detailed annual report including the amounts actually involved in the financial corrections;
pozdravlja, da je Komisija dne 17. januarja 2006 sprejela sporočilo Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Računskemu sodišču o akcijskem načrtu Komisije za integrirani okvir notranje kontrole ( KOM(2006)0009 in SEK(2006)0049 ), ki določa 16 konkretnih ukrepov, s katerimi naj bi dosegli bolj učinkovito notranjo kontrolo sredstev EU;
Welcomes the Commission's adoption on 17 January 2006 of its communication to the Council, the European Parliament and the Court of Auditors: Commission Action Plan towards an Integrated Internal Control Framework ( COM(2006)0009 and SEC(2006)0049 ), which sets out 16 concrete actions to be undertaken in order to contribute to ensuring more effective internal controls over EU funds;
z navdušenjem pozdravlja prvi polletni pregled napredka na področju izvajanja ukrepov iz navedenega akcijskega načrta, ki ga je Komisija predstavila dne 19. julija 2006 ( SEK(2006)1001 ) v skladu z zahtevo Parlamenta iz resolucije o razrešnici za leto 2004; pričakuje, da bo Parlament drugi polletni pregled napredka prejel pred 1. januarjem 2008;
Welcomes the first half-yearly scoreboard submitted by the Commission on 19 July 2006 ( SEC(2006)1001 ) on the implementation of the above Action Plan, pursuant to Parliament's request in its resolution on the discharge for 2004; expects that the second half-yearly scoreboard will reach Parliament before 1 January 2008;
kljub temu obžaluje, da se v skladu z navedenim poročilom nekateri ukrepi niso izvajali zaradi zamud v predvidenem časovnem razporedu, zlasti ukrepi 7, 9 in 10 Ukrep 7:
Regrets, however, the fact that, as that report states, some of the actions have not even been started and there is thus already a degree of delay with regard to the planned calendar, particularly concerning Actions 7, 9 and 10 Action 7:
spodbujanje najboljših praks za izboljšanje razmerja med stroški in koristmi pri revizijah na ravni projektov;
Promote best practices for increasing the cost-benefit of audits at project level
Ukrep 9:
; Action 9:
spodbujanje pristopa enotne revizije;
Promote the single audit approach
Ukrep 10:
; Action 10:
poudarja, da je Računsko sodišče v letnem poročilu za leto 2005 v zvezi z vzpostavitvijo integriranega okvira notranje kontrole menilo, da "sorazmernost in stroškovna učinkovitost kontrol predstavljata enega najpomembnejših ciljev, ki jih je odobrila Komisija" (točki 2.9 in 2.10);
Points out that the Court of Auditors, in its annual report for 2005 and with respect to the establishment of an integrated internal control framework, takes the view that 'one of the most important objectives approved by the Commission is represented by the proportionality and cost-effectiveness of controls' (paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10);
opozarja tudi, da je Ekonomsko-socialni svet dne 8. novembra 2005 razsodil, da je izvajanje integrirane notranje kontrole bistveno, in navedel, da je Svet v skladu z mnenjem Sodišča št. 2/2004 sklenil, da bi moral doseči sporazum z Evropskim parlamentom v zvezi z dopustnimi tveganji pri transakcijah, ob upoštevanju stroškov in koristi kontrol v okviru različnih politik ter ustreznega zneska odhodkov; pričakuje, da bo Svet hitro uresničil svoje sklepe;
Recalls, furthermore, that the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 8 November 2005, as mentioned above, laid major stress on the need to implement an integrated internal control system, and stated: 'The Council believes, in line with the Court's opinion 2/2004, that it should reach an understanding with the European Parliament regarding the risks to be tolerated in the underlying transactions, having regard to the costs and benefits of controls for the different policy areas and the value of the expenditure concerned'; expects the Council to act on its own decision promptly;
opozarja na ukrep 4 zgoraj navedenega akcijskega načrta, ki v skladu s priporočili Parlamenta, predlaga "začetek medinstitucionalnega dialoga o dopustnih tveganjih pri transakcijah, povezanih z računovodskimi izkazi";
Recalls Action 4 of the above-mentioned Action Plan, which, in line with the recommendations of Parliament, proposes initiating 'interinstitutional dialogue on risks to be tolerated in the underlying transactions';
opozarja tudi na ukrep 10, katerega cilj je izvajanje "analize stroškov kontrol", ker je treba doseči "ustrezno ravnovesje med stroški in koristmi kontrol", in rezultate katerega se bo predstavilo v začetku leta 2007, vendar ugotavlja, da se je ta ukrep šele začel izvajati;
Also recalls Action 10, which proposes making an 'analysis of the costs of controls', in view of the 'need to reach an appropriate balance between the costs and benefits of controls', and which states that the results will be presented in early 2007; notes, however, that implementation of this action has scarcely begun;
s tem v zvezi poudarja pomen Mnenja Računskega sodišča št. 2/2004 glede modela enotne revizije, zlasti v zvezi s potrebo po zagotovitvi sovpadanja ravni organov, ki predpisujejo, financirajo in imajo koristi (točka 24), glede sorazmernosti med stroški in koristmi kontrol (točka 25) in glede preglednosti kontrol (točka 26);
Stresses, in this context, the importance of Opinion No 2/2004 of the Court of Auditors regarding the Single Audit Model, namely as regards the need to insure the coincidence between the level of authority that legislates, finances and benefits from controls (point 24), as regards proportionality between costs and benefits of controls (point 25) and as regards transparency of controls (point 26);
obžaluje, tako kot Računsko sodišče v svojem mnenju št. 4/2006, da še ni bilo določeno razmerje med sprejemljivim tveganjem ter razmerjem med stroški in koristmi kontrol, ter da še ni bilo pojasnjeno, kako je mogoče določiti sprejemljivo tveganje, čeprav gre za bistven koncept sistema integrirane notranje kontrole;
Agrees with the Court of Auditors when, in its Opinion No 4/2006, it regrets that the relationship between tolerable risk levels and the cost-benefit ratio of controls has yet to be established and that, even though it is a vital concept for the integrated control system, it has not yet been clarified how an 'acceptable risk level' is to be determined;
zato meni, da bi morala Komisija ob spoštovanju načel sorazmernosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti kontrolnih sistemov oceniti obstoječe razmerje med sredstvi, ki so na voljo za posamezno politiko, ter delom teh sredstev, ki jih uporablja v kontrolnih sistemih glede na področje odhodkov, in tudi sredstvi, ki bi se lahko izgubila zaradi tako ugotovljenih napak;
Considers, therefore, that the Commission, in line with the principles of proportionality and cost efficiency (value for money) of the control systems, should evaluate the relationship between, on the one hand, the resources available for each particular policy, and, on the other, the part of those resources dedicated to the control systems broken down by area of expenditure, and any resources lost thanks to errors thus detected;
poziva Komisijo, da javnosti v celoti razkrije metode, ki jih uporablja za določanje stopenj napake, ter jo spodbuja k medinstitucionalnem dialogu o metodologiji revizije;
Invites the Commission to fully disclose to the public the methods it uses for the determination of the rates of error, and encourages the Commission to pursue an interinstitutional dialogue on audit methodology;
meni, da je za Komisijo bistveno, da razpolaga z verodostojnim načrtom za doseganje pozitivne izjave o zanesljivosti;
Considers it essential for the Commission to have a credible roadmap to achieve a positive DAS;
poziva Komisijo, da uspešno izvede to primerjalno analizo, ki je edini temelj za določitev ravni dopustnega tveganja, ter jo predloži Parlamentu, Svetu in Računskemu sodišču v skladu z zahtevo Ekonomsko-socialnega sveta;
Calls on the Commission to carry out that comparative analysis, as forming the sole basis which will make it possible to establish an 'acceptable risk level', and to forward it to Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors, in compliance with the wishes of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council;
meni, da bi moral biti odnos med stroški in koristmi, ki obstaja med sredstvi, uporabljenimi pri dejavnostih nadzora, in rezultatom teh kontrol, temeljni element, ki ga mora Računsko sodišče upoštevati pri oblikovanju izjave o zanesljivosti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo poslovnih knjig;
Believes that the cost-benefit ratio existing between the resources dedicated to control activities and the results obtained by the controls should be a key element to be taken into account by the Court of Auditors when it delivers its statement of assurance;
poudarja, da različna vsebina letnih poročil o dejavnostih služb ovira ta postopek; vendar je zaskrbljen nad izjavo Sodišča, da nekatera od teh poročil še vedno ne vključujejo ustreznih dokazov za izjavo o zanesljivosti (točke 2.15, 2.18 in 2.19 letnega poročila za leto 2005);
Stresses that the differing information content of services" annual activity reports is a hindrance to this procedure; is concerned at the Court's statement that some of those reports still do not include sufficient evidence for its statement of assurance (paragraphs 2.15, 2.18 and 2.19 of the annual report for 2005);
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da bodo letna poročila o delu in priložene izjave podrobneje, po možnosti na ravni posameznih držav članic, obravnavali obstoječe sisteme, ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti in njihove finančne posledice;
Asks the Commission to ensure that its annual activity reports and statements go into much greater detail - where possible on the level of the individual Member States - in the evaluation of the existing systems, the shortcomings detected by them and their financial impact;
znova poziva generalnega sekretarja Komisije, da pri oblikovanju zbirnega poročila izda izjavo o zanesljivosti v zvezi z izjavami vseh generalnih sekretarjev, da bi se izrecno poudarila pomoč, ki jo daje kolegiju komisarjev, ko se odločajo o svojem stališču glede vsebine poročila;
Asks the Commission once again to ensure that its Secretary-General, when preparing the synthesis report, draws up a statement of assurance which includes reference to the statements of each of the directors-general, with the aim of making express mention of their assistance to the Commissioners in the adoption of that report;
poudarja pomen mnenja notranjega revizorja Komisije, ki ga je ta izrazil v letnem poročilu o notranjih revizijah, v skladu s katerim "bi polna vključenost komisarjev pri oceni političnih tveganj omogočila boljše celovito obvladovanje tveganj ter s tem boljše načrtovanje in dodeljevanje sredstev ter uresničevanje politik" Letno poročilo organu, ki podeli razrešnico, o notranjih revizijah, opravljenih leta 2005 (Člen 86(4) Finančne uredbe) ( KOM(2006)0279 ), točka 2.1, str.
Stresses the importance of the opinion expressed by the Commission's internal auditor in his annual report on the internal audits to the effect that 'a full involvement of Commissioners to evaluate political risks would allow better overall management of risks and thus improve planning, resource allocation and policy delivery' Annual report for 2005 of the internal auditors to the discharge authority (Article 86.4 of the Financial Regulation) ( COM(2006)0279 ), point 2.1, p.