natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
10. močno podpira diplomatska prizadevanja EU in njenih mednarodnih partnerjev, da bi varnostni svet OZN obsodil nasilje, do katerega prihaja v Siriji, zavrnil nekaznovanost in pozval sirske oblasti k podpiranju legitimnega stremljenja sirskega naroda; obžaluje, da ta prizadevanja doslej niso obrodila sadov in da se ne da sprejeti resolucije; poziva države članice EU in visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, naj še naprej sodeluje z mednarodnimi partnerji za ukrepanje varnostnega sveta OZN glede razmer v Siriji in za to, da bi sirske oblasti uresničile svojo odgovornost za zaščito sirskega prebivalstva;
Strongly supports the EU’s diplomatic efforts with its partners in the international community to ensure that the UN Security Council (UNSC) condemns the ongoing violence in Syria, rejects impunity and urges the Syrian authorities to meet the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people; regrets the fact that these efforts have not been successful so far and that a resolution could not be introduced; calls on the EU Member States and the VP/HR to continue working with their international partners to secure the involvement of the UNSC in the situation in Syria and the implementation by the Syrian authorities of their responsibility to protect the Syrian population;
13. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj nemudoma priskrbita pomoč in podporo turškim in libanonskim oblastem pri njihovih prizadevanjih za obvladanje humanitarne krize na meji s Sirijo, med drugim z vzpostavitvijo humanitarnega koridorja na ravni OZN;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to immediately provide aid and support to the Turkish and Lebanese authorities in their efforts to manage the humanitarian crisis on their borders with Syria, including by setting up a humanitarian corridor at UN level;
17. izraža solidarnost z jemenskim ljudstvom, pozdravlja njegovo željo po demokratičnih spremembah v državi in podpira prizadevanja Sveta za sodelovanje v Zalivu, kolikor so usmerjena k iskanju sporazumne rešitve v okviru bolj vključujočega političnega sistema, zajemajo odstop predsednika Saleha in njegovih družinskih članov, ki ostajajo na položajih politične moči, ter so usmerjena v zmanjšanje revščine in izboljšanje življenjskih razmer večine prebivalstva;
Expresses its solidarity with the people of Yemen, welcomes their aspirations for democratic change in their country and supports the efforts of the GCC in as much as these are directed at finding a negotiated solution, which implies the resignation of President Saleh and his of family members who remain in positions of power, within the framework of a more inclusive political system geared towards poverty alleviation and improved living conditions for the majority of the population;
20. pozdravlja misijo urada visoke komisarke OZN za človekove pravice v Jemnu, ki je ocenila tamkajšnje razmere glede človekovih pravic in bo oblikovala priporočila za jemensko vlado in mednarodno skupnost;
Welcomes the mission of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to Yemen, which assessed the human rights situation in that country and will make recommendations to the Yemeni Government and to the international community;
23. poziva bahrajnske oblasti, naj spremenijo smrtno obsodbo Alija Abdulaha Hasana Al Sankisa in Abdulaziza Abdulride Ibrahima Huseina in naj uvedejo de facto moratorij za smrtno kazen;
Calls on the Bahraini authorities to commute the death sentences of Ali Abdullah Hassan al-Sankis and Abdulaziz Abdulridha Ibrahim Hussain, and to reinstate the de facto moratorium on capital punishment;
25. pozdravlja oblikovanje ministrstva za človekove pravice in družbeni razvoj v Bahrajnu in ga poziva, naj deluje v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi in obveznostmi na področju človekovih pravic;
Welcomes the setting-up of a Ministry for Human Rights and Social Development in Bahrain, and calls on that ministry to act in accordance with international human rights standards and obligations;
28. ponavlja zavezanost mednarodne skupnosti zaščiti civilistov v Libiji, tudi s povečanjem pritiska na tamkajšnji režim, in podporo gradnji demokratične libijske države; pozdravlja odločitev EU, da bo zaostrila sankcije zoper ta režim in na seznam o zamrznitvi premoženja dodala šest pristaniških uprav, ki so pod njegovim nadzorom; ponavlja, naj polkovnik Moamer Mohamed Abu Minjar Gadafi takoj odstopi;
Reiterates the commitment of the international community to protect civilians in Libya, including through the intensification of pressure on the Libyan regime, and to support the building of a democratic Libyan state; welcomes the EU’s decision to step up its sanctions against the regime by adding six port authorities under the regime’s control to the EU asset‑freeze list; reiterates its call on Colonel Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi to relinquish power immediately;
33. pozdravlja zavezanost političnim reformam v Jordaniji, zlasti revizijo ustave in delo odbora za nacionalni dialog; pozdravlja prizadevanja jordanskih oblasti in poudarja, da je treba reforme konkretno izvajati; želi spomniti, da je EU Jordaniji leta 2010 podelila „prednostno“ partnerstvo;
Welcomes the commitment to political reforms of Jordan, and in particular the review of the Jordanian Constitution and the work of the National Dialogue Committee; commends the efforts made by the Jordanian authorities and emphasises the need for the concrete implementation of reforms; notes that the EU agreed to grant Jordan ‘Advanced Status’ partnership in 2010;
36. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj primere držav južnega Sredozemlja obravnavata posamično s pristopom „več za več“, kakor je bilo opredeljeno v skupnem sporočilu z dne 25. maja 2011, pri čemer je treba nagraditi napredek na področju demokracije, svobodnih in pravičnih volitev, predvsem pa človekovih pravic;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to follow a differentiated approach based on the ‘more for more’ policy as set out in the Joint Communication of 25 May 2011 with regard to Southern Mediterranean countries, under which real progress on democracy, free and fair elections and, above all, human rights should be rewarded;
vv imenu skupine Verts/ALE
on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
PE465.720v01-00 } PE465.721v01-00 } PE465.728v01-00 } PE465.746v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o spremembah v zvezi s Schengnom
PE465.720v01-00 } PE465.721v01-00 } PE465.728v01-00 } PE465.746v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on changes to Schengen
– ob upoštevanju člena 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in členov 3, 18, 20, 21, 67, 77 in 80 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 2 TEU and Articles 3, 18, 20, 21, 67, 77 and 80 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to Article 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 19. junija 1990,
– having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, of 19 June 1990,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str.
– having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 562/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o Zakoniku Skupnosti o pravilih, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek meja (Zakonik o schengenskih mejah) UL L 105, 13.4.2006, str.
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda ( KOM(2010)0624 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis ( COM(2010)0624 ),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka poročila o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda,
– having regard to the draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. aprila 2009 o uporabi Direktive 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ( 2008/2184(INI) ) UL C 137 E, 27.5.2010, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2009 on the application of Directive 2004/38/EC on the right to citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (2008/2184 (INI)) OJ C 137 E, 27.5.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o migracijah z dne 4. maja 2011 ( KOM(2011)0248 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 4 May 2011 on migration ( COM(2011)0248 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 9. junija 2011,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 9 June 2011,
A. ker je vzpostavitev schengenskega območja in vključitev schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir EU eden največjih dosežkov procesa evropskega povezovanja, ki sta ga zaznamovala odprava osebnih kontrol na notranjih mejah in dotlej nepoznana svoboda gibanja za več kot 400 milijonov prebivalcev na ozemlju 4 312 099 km 2 ,
A. whereas the creation of the Schengen area and the integration of the Schengen acquis into the EU framework is one of the greatest achievements of the European integration process, marked by the removal of controls on persons at internal borders and unprecedented freedom of movement for a population of more than 400 million people over an area of 4 312 099 km 2 ,
B. ker je svoboda gibanja postala eden od stebrov državljanstva EU in eden od temeljev tega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki obsega pravico do svobodnega gibanja in prebivanja v vseh državah članicah ter uživanja enakih pravic, zaščite in jamstev, vključno s prepovedjo vseh oblik diskriminacije na osnovi državljanstva,
B. whereas freedom of movement has become one of the pillars of EU citizenship and one of the foundations of the EU as an area of freedom, security and justice, enshrining the right to move and reside freely in all Member States while enjoying the same rights, protections and guarantees, including the ban on all forms of discrimination based on nationality,
C. ker se lahko svoboda gibanja v EU v skladu z zakonikom o schengenskih mejah in členom 45 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah pod posebnimi pogoji prenese tudi na državljane tretjih držav, ki zakonito prebivajo v EU,
C. whereas, according to the Schengen Borders Code and Article 45 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, freedom of movement in the EU may, under specific conditions, also be extended to third-country nationals legally resident in the EU,
Nedavni dogodki
Recent events
D. ker so se zlasti v preteklem letu ljudje množično selili iz več severnoafriških držav; ker je bil schengenski sistem pred nedavnim pod pritiskom zaradi nekaterih držav članic, ki so zaradi nenadnega pritoka migrantov razmišljale o ponovni uvedbi nadzora na državnih mejah,
D. whereas, especially in the last year, there has been a massive displacement of people from several North African countries; whereas the Schengen system has recently come under pressure, with some Member States considering the reintroduction of national border controls in the face of the sudden influx of migrants,
E. ker je Komisija 4. maja 2011 predstavila več pobud za bolj strukturiran pristop k preseljevanju, pri čemer je upoštevala zlasti nedavne dogodke v sredozemski regiji in vključila vanje predlog o Schengnu; ker se Komisija v sklepih Evropskega sveta z dne 23. in 24. junija 2011 poziva k predstavitvi predloga o „zaščitnem mehanizmu” za odziv na „izredne okoliščine”, ki bi lahko ogrozile schengensko sodelovanje,
E. whereas on 4 May 2011 the Commission presented several initiatives for a more structured approach to migration, taking into account in particular the recent developments in the Mediterranean region and including a proposal on Schengen; whereas the European Council conclusions of 23-24 June 2011 ask the Commission to present a proposal on a ‘safeguard mechanism’ in order to respond to ‘exceptional circumstances’ that might put the Schengen cooperation at risk,
Zakonik o schengenskih mejah/politika preseljevanja
Schengen Borders Code/migration policy
F. ker so schengenska pravila, ki urejajo gibanje oseb prek notranjih meja, določena v zakoniku o schengenskih mejah, katerega členi od 23 do 26 določajo ukrepe in postopke za začasno ponovno uvedbo nadzora na notranjih mejah, ker pa tak nadzor, če je enostranski, onemogoča, da bi prevladali skupni interesi EU,
F. whereas the Schengen rules governing the movement of persons across internal borders are defined in the Schengen Borders Code, Articles 23 to 26 of which set out measures and procedures for the temporary reintroduction of internal border controls, but whereas such controls, being of a unilateral nature, do not allow the collective EU interest to prevail,
G. ker se je z vzpostavitvijo schengenskega območja določila skupna zunanja meja, za katere upravljanje je EU po členu 80 PDEU skupno odgovorna; ker EU še ni v celoti izpolnila te zahteve, čeprav je že poskušala vzpostaviti učinkovit nadzor in sodelovanje med carinskimi, policijskimi in pravosodnimi organi, razviti skupno priseljevalno, azilno in vizumsko politiko ter vzpostaviti schengenski informacijski sistem druge generacije (SIS II) ter vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS),
G. whereas the creation of the Schengen area defined a common external border, which the EU has a joint responsibility to manage under Article 80 TFEU; whereas the EU has not yet fully complied with this requirement, although it has sought to establish effective controls and cooperation between customs, police and judicial authorities, to develop a common immigration, asylum and visa policy and to establish the second-generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) and the Visa Information System (VIS),
H. ker je za odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah nujno, da države članice popolnoma zaupajo druga drugi, da so sposobne v celoti izvesti spremljevalne ukrepe, ki omogočajo odpravo tega nadzora, ker je varnost na schengenskem območju odvisna od tega, kako strogo in učinkovito posamezne države članice izvajajo nadzor na zunanjih mejah, ter od kakovosti in hitrosti izmenjave informacij prek schengenskega informacijskega sistema; ker neustrezno delovanje katerega koli teh elementov ogroža varnost EU kot celote,
H. whereas the abolition of internal border controls requires the Member States to have complete trust in one another’s capacity to implement fully the accompanying measures allowing such controls to be lifted; whereas the security of the Schengen area depends on the rigour and effectiveness with which each Member State carries out controls at its external borders, as well as on the quality and speed of exchanges of information via the SIS; whereas the inadequate functioning of any of these elements presents a risk to the security of the EU as a whole,
I. ker je za brezhibno delovanje schengenskega območja pomembno oceniti, ali države članice spoštujejo schengenski pravni red; ker se je pokazalo, da ocenjevalni mehanizem na osnovi delovne skupine za schengensko evalvacijo (SCH-EVAL), ki je povsem medvladno telo, ni dovolj učinkovit,
I. whereas it is essential to evaluate the Member States’ compliance with the Schengen acquis in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the Schengen area; whereas the evaluation mechanism based on the Schengen Evaluation Working Group (SCH-EVAL), a purely intergovernmental body, has not proven sufficiently effective,
J. ker je treba ukiniti dvojne standarde, ki se trenutno uporabljajo za Schengen, ko se za vse države kandidatke postavljajo zelo visoke zahteve, države, ki so že članice schengenskega območja, pa obravnavajo izjemno popustljivo;
J. whereas the double standards currently operating in respect of Schengen, whereby high demands are placed on all candidate countries while those countries already belonging to the Schengen area are treated very complacently, should be abolished,
K. ker je bil v predlogu uredbe o vzpostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma za preverjanje uporabe schengenskega pravnega reda določen nov mehanizem ocenjevanja, ki ga zdaj v rednem zakonodajnem postopku obravnava Evropski parlament; ker ta mehanizem že določa postopke, načela in sredstva, ki podpirajo in ocenjujejo, kako države članice spoštujejo schengenski pravni red tudi ob nepredvidenih dogodkih,
K. whereas a new evaluation mechanism is set out in the proposal for a Regulation establishing an evaluation mechanism to verify application of the Schengen acquis , which is currently being examined by the EP under the ordinary legislative procedure; whereas this mechanism already specifies procedures, principles and tools for supporting and assessing the Member States’ compliance with the Schengen acquis , including in the face of unforeseen events,
L. ker člen 77 PDEU navaja, da Evropski parlament in Svet po rednem zakonodajnem postopku sprejmeta ukrepe, med drugim tudi glede kontrole, ki se opravi pri osebah pri prehodu zunanjih meja, če ni preverjanja oseb pri prehajanju notranjih meja ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo,
L. whereas Article 77 TFEU states that Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall adopt measures concerning, inter alia, the checks to which persons crossing external borders are subject in the absence of any controls of persons, whatever their nationality, when crossing internal borders,
Pomen Schengna
Importance of Schengen
2. močno priporoča, da se okrepi upravljanje schengenskega območja, da bi se vsem državam članicam pomagalo zagotoviti učinkovit nadzor nad njihovim delom zunanjih meja EU, okrepilo medsebojno zaupanje in povečalo zaupanje v učinkovitost sistema, s katerim EU upravlja preseljevanje; odločno poudarja, da je potrebna večja solidarnost do držav članic, v katerih je pritok migrantov največji, da se jim pomaga reševati te izjemne razmere;
Strongly recommends strengthening the Schengen governance in order to help ensure that each Member State can effectively control its section of the EU’s external borders, to reinforce mutual trust and to build confidence in the effectiveness of the EU system of migration management; firmly stresses the need for greater solidarity towards those Member States facing the greatest influx of migrants in order to help them deal with extraordinary situations of this nature;
5. meni, da je ocenjevalni mehanizem učinkovit, ker vsebuje možnost sankcij, kadar se pomanjkljivosti ne odpravijo in ogrožajo splošno varnost schengenskega območja; opozarja, da je osnovni namen takih sankcij odvračanje;
Believes that the effectiveness of the evaluation mechanism lies in the possibility of sanctions in the event that deficiencies persist and jeopardise the overall security of the Schengen area; recalls that the primary purpose of such sanctions is dissuasion;
8. močno obžaluje poskuse nekaterih držav članic, da bi ponovno uvedle nadzor na mejah, ki jasno ogrožajo samo bistvo schengenskega pravnega reda;
Strongly regrets the attempt by several Member States to reintroduce border controls, which clearly jeopardises the very spirit of the Schengen acquis ;
o Indoneziji
on Indonesia
PE465.722v01-00 } PE465.734v01-00 } PE465.752v01-00 } PE465.753v01-00 } PE465.754v01-00 } PE465.755v01-00 } PE465.756v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Indoneziji
PE465.722v01-00 } PE465.734v01-00 } PE465.752v01-00 } PE465.753v01-00 } PE465.754v01-00 } PE465.755v01-00 } PE465.756v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on Indonesia
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. decembra 2010 o letnem poročilu EU o človekovih pravicah v svetu za leto 2006 ter zadevne politike EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0489 .
– having regard to its resolution of 16 December 2010 on the Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2009 and the European Union’s policy on the matter Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0489 .
– ob upoštevanju izvolitve Indonezije v Svet Združenih narodov za človekove pravice (UNHRC) maja 2011; ker se od članov UNHRC pričakuje, da bodo zagovarjali najvišje standarde glede promocije in varovanja človekovih pravic,
– having regard to Indonesia’s election to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in May 2011; whereas UNHRC members are required to uphold the highest standards regarding the promotion and protection of human rights,
– ob upoštevanju predsedovanja Indonezije Združenju držav jugovzhodne Azije (ASEAN) v letu 2011, listine združenja ASEAN, ki je začela veljati 15. decembra 2008 in ustanovitve medvladne komisije ASEAN za človekove pravice 23. oktobra 2009,
– having regard to Indonesia’s chairmanship of ASEAN in 2011, the ASEAN Charter, which entered into force on 15 December 2008, and the creation of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights on 23 October 2009,
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, ki ga je Indonezija ratificirala leta 2006,
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Indonesia ratified in 2006,
– ob upoštevanju 29. poglavja indonezijske ustave, ki zagotavlja svobodo vere,
– having regard to Chapter 29 of the Indonesian Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion,
– ob upoštevanju členov 156 in 156(a) indonezijskega kazenskega zakonika, ki prepovedujeta bogoskrunstvo, krivo vero in versko obrekovanje,
– having regard to Articles 156 and 156(a) of the Indonesian Criminal Code prohibiting blasphemy, heresy and religious defamation,
– ob upoštevanju predsedniškega odloka št. 1/PNPS/1965 o preprečevanju bogoskrunstva in zlorabe vere;
– having regard to Presidential Decree No 1/PNPS/1965 on the prevention of blasphemy and abuse of religions,
– ob upoštevanju izjave EU z dne 8. februarja 2011 o nedavnih napadih na ahmadijce in ubojih njihovih pripadnikov v provinci Banten,
– having regard to the EU statement of 8 February 2011 on the recent attacks on and killings of Ahmadis in Banten province,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med ES in Indonezijo in prvega kroga dialoga o človekovih pravicah , ki je potekal v njegovem okviru junija 2010 v Džakarti,
– having regard to the EU-Indonesia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) and the first round of the Human Rights Dialogue held in that framework, which took place in June 2010 in Jakarta,
A. ker je Indonezija največja država na svetu, kjer je muslimansko prebivalstvo v večini, in ker je v njeni nacionalni ideologiji imenovani pancasila zapisana tradicija pluralizma, kulturne skladnosti, verske svobode in socialne pravičnosti,
A. whereas Indonesia is the world’s largest predominantly Muslim nation, and whereas Indonesia’s tradition of pluralism, cultural harmony, religious freedom and social justice is enshrined in the national ideology of ‘Pancasila’,
B. ker smo priča precejšnjemu stopnjevanju napadov na verske manjšine, zlasti na ahmadijce, ki se štejejo za muslimane, pa tudi na kristjane, budiste in napredne organizacije civilne družbe,
B. whereas there has been a significant increase in the incidence of attacks against religious minorities, particularly Ahmadis, who consider themselves Muslims, but also against Christians, Buddhists and progressive civil society organisations,