natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nova Priloga 12 h kmetijskemu sporazumu bo izboljšala dvostransko trgovino s kmetijskimi proizvodi med ES in Švico.
The new Annex 12 to the "Agricultural Agreement" will improve of the bilateral EC-Switzerland agricultural trade.
Zato je sprememba Dodatnega sporazuma korak, ki je obenem pozitiven in nujen.
Therefore amending the "Additional Agreement" is also a positive and necessary step.
Poročevalec Parlamentu predlaga, naj ta sporazum odobri.
The rapporteur recommends Parliament to give its consent to the agreement.
Catherine Bearder, George Sabin Cutaş, Syed Kamall, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Elisabeth Köstinger, Jörg Leichtfried, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
Catherine Bearder, George Sabin Cutaş, Syed Kamall, Maria Eleni Koppa, Elisabeth Köstinger, Jörg Leichtfried, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
o 27. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava EU (2009)
on the twenty-seventh annual report on monitoring the application of European Union law (2009)
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................10
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 11
MNENJE Odbora za peticije ..........................................................................................13
OPINION of the Committee on Petitions ...............................................................14
– ob upoštevanju 27. letnega poročila o spremljanju uporabe prava EU (2009) ( KOM(2010)0538 ),
– having regard to the twenty-seventh annual report on monitoring the application of European Union law (2009) ( COM(2010)0538 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov osebja Komisije SEK(2010)1143 in SEK(2010)1144 ,
– having regard to Commission staff working documents ( SEC(2010)1143 ) and ( SEC(2010)1144 ),
– ob upoštevanju ocenjevalnega poročila Komisije o sistemu „EU pilot“ ( KOM(2010)0070 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission entitled ‘EU Pilot Evaluation Report’ ( COM(2010)0070 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o izvajanju člena 260(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( SEC(2010)1371 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication on the implementation of Article 260(3) TFEU ( SEC(2010)1371 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. septembra 2007 z naslovom „Evropa rezultatov – uporaba prava Skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 5 September 2007 entitled ‘A Europe of results – applying Community law’ ( COM(2007)0502 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o 26. letnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije (2008)
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the twenty-sixth annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2008)
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0437 . ,
Texts adopted P7_TA(2010)0437 . ,
– ob upoštevanju odgovora Komisije na njegovo resolucijo z dne 25. novembra 2010 o 26. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije (2008),
– having regard to the Commission’s reply to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the twenty-sixth annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2008),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in Odbora za peticije ( A7-0249/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0249/2011 ),
A. ker je 1. decembra 2009 začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, ki je uvedla številne nove pravne podlage, katerih namen je lažje izvajanje, uporaba in izvrševanje prava EU,
A. whereas the Lisbon Treaty entered into force on 1 December 2009 and introduced a number of new legal bases intended to facilitate the implementation, application and enforcement of EU law,
B. ker v skladu s členom 298 PDEU institucije, organe, urade in agencije Unije pri izvajanju njihovih nalog podpira odprta, učinkovita in neodvisna evropska uprava,
B. whereas according to Article 298 TFEU, in carrying out their missions, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration,
2. poudarja temeljni pomen, ki ga ima vladavina prava za legitimnost vsakršne oblike upravljanja in vodenja ter za resnično demokracijo, v kateri so posebni ukrepi skladni z veljavnimi splošnimi pravili, pa tudi za predvidljivost in objektivno utemeljene odločitve in kot jamstvo državljanom, da lahko polno in učinkovito uživajo svoje zakonite pravice;
Emphasises the fundamental importance of the rule of law as a condition not only for the legitimacy of any form of governance and administration and for genuine democracy in which specific actions comply with the general norms laid down, but also for the predictability and objective soundness of decisions, and as a guarantee that citizens can fully and effectively enjoy their rights as provided by law;
Ocenjevalno poročilo sistema „EU pilot“, str.
EU Pilot Evaluation Report, p.
2. in v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi upravami preučuje, kako izvajati pravo EU; meni, da ta pobuda delno ustreza novi potrebi, ki je nastala s sprejetjem Lizbonske pogodbe, in sicer po sodelovanju med vsemi institucijami Evropske unije, vendar spodbuja Komisijo, naj jamči državljanom, da bodo vedno vključeni pri obravnavi skladnosti s pravom EU;
2. and is considering, in close cooperation with national administrations, how to deal with the application of EU law; considers that this initiative partially responds to the new need for cooperation between all institutions of the European Union following the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, but urges the Commission to guarantee that citizens are always included when dealing with compliance with EU law;
Glej zgoraj omenjeno sporočilo z dne 20. marca 2002, str.
See the Commission’s above-mentioned communication of 20 March 2002, p.
7. je seznanjen s številom peticij, za katere ni možno najti rešitve po sekundarni zakonodaji EU ali določb Pogodb, ki se uporabljajo neposredno, ki pa vendarle kažejo na kršitve načel, ki so zahtevana za vstop v Unijo in ki ustrezajo vrednotam, določenim v členu 2 PEU, pri čimer člen 7 PEU ureja postopke za spoštovanje teh vrednot;
Notes the number of petitions for which no solution can be provided under EU secondary legislation or directly applicable treaty norms, but which nevertheless indicate violations of the principles required for entering the Union that correspond to the values laid down in Article 2 TEU, with Article 7 TEU regulating the procedures for upholding these values;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. novembra 2010 o 26. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije (2008) ( P7_TA(2010)0437 ). ;
European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on the 26th Annual Report on Monitoring the application of European Union law (2008) ( P7_TA(2010)0437 ). ;
11. pozdravlja zaveze Komisije, vendar meni, da so potrebna dodatna prizadevanja vseh vpletenih strani – držav članic, Komisije, Sveta in Parlamenta –, da bi Unija in njen notranji trg postala oprijemljiva resničnost za državljane, njihove organizacije in podjetja;
Welcomes the Commission’s commitments, but considers that further efforts are needed by all concerned – Member States, the Commission, the Council and Parliament – in order to make the Union and its internal market a tangible reality for citizens, their organisations and enterprises;
15. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je z uporabo metode pilotskega projekta skrajšalo obdobje, potrebno za preiskovanje domnevnih kršitev, vendar meni, da mora Komisija Parlamentu pojasniti in posredovati dodatne podatke, da bo lahko presodil o uspešnosti te metode s stališča njenega dejanske spoštovanja v državah članicah;
Welcomes the shorter timeframes needed for investigating alleged infringements through use of the pilot project method, but considers that clarification and further information is needed from the Commission in order for Parliament to be able to judge the success of this method from the point of view of actual compliance by Member States;
Sodbe Splošnega sodišča v zadevi T-105/95, WWF Združeno kraljestvo proti Komisiji, [1997] ECR II-313, in zadevi T191/99, Petrie in drugi proti Komisiji, [2001] II-3677, in sodba sodišča z dne 21. septembra 2010 v združenih zadevah C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P in C-532/07 P, Kraljevina Švedska proti Association de la presse internationale in Evropski komisiji, Association de la presse internationale ASBL proti Evropski komisiji in Evropska komisija proti Association de la presse internationale, ki še niso bile objavljene v Zbirki odločb. , ki potrjujejo potrebo po tem, da Komisija zagotavlja zaupnost dokumentov, ki se nanašajo na postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev in preiskave pred začetkom teh postopkov; opozarja Komisijo, da Sodišče v teh zadevah nikoli ni zanikalo tega, da je dostop do dokumentov mogoče utemeljiti s prevladujočim javnim interesom; dodaja še, da je varuh človekovih pravic glede izdaje dokumentov, povezanih s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, podal pozitivno mnenje
Judgments of the General Court in Case T-105/95 WWF UK v Commission [1997] ECR II-313 and in Case T‑191/99 Petrie and Others v Commission [2001] II-3677 and judgment of the Court of Justice in 21 September 2010 in Joined Cases C-514/07 P, C-528/07 P and C-532/07 P Kingdom of Sweden v Association de la presse internationale and European Commission , Association de la presse internationale ASBL v European Commission and European Commission v Association de la presse internationale, not yet reported in the ECR . , which would confirm the need for the Commission to ensure the confidentiality of documents which relate to infringement proceedings and pre-infringement proceeding investigations; reminds the Commission that the Court of Justice has never denied in those cases that an overriding public interest might well justify access to documents; also notes that the Ombudsman has showed a positive approach to the release of documents related to infringement procedures
19. je seznanjen, da je navzkrižje interesov organov odločanja omenjeno v mnogih peticijah, in odločno podpira sprejetje uredbe EU o upravnih postopkih, ki mora vključevati tudi splošna načela za postopke ugotavljanja kršitev;
Notes that many petitions refer to conflicts of interest among decision-makers and strongly supports the adoption of a regulation on EU administrative procedures which should also include general principles on infringement proceedings;
22. opominja Komisijo, da že omenjeno sporočilo z dne 20. marca 2002 o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami prava EU vsebuje postopkovne korake, ki jih Komisija pri urejanju svoje diskrecijske pravice ocenjuje kot sprejemljive, zaradi česar ne bi smelo biti nobenih zadržkov pri oblikovanju uredbe na osnovi tega instrumenta; je seznanjen z namero Komisije, da to sporočilo znova preuči; poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev ne uporablja nezavezujočih aktov, temveč naj predlaga uredbo, da bo Parlament pri tako bistvenem elementu pravnega reda EU v polni meri udeležen kot sozakonodajalec;
Reminds the Commission that the above-mentioned Communication of 20 March 2002 concerning the relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of EU law contains procedural steps that the Commission finds acceptable in respect of regulating its discretion and that there should therefore be no obstacle to basing a regulation on this instrument; notes the Commission’s intention to review that communication; urges the Commission not to make use of soft law when dealing with the infringement procedure but to propose a regulation in order for Parliament to be fully involved as co-legislator in such an essential element of the EU’s legal order;
25. ocenjuje kot nujno, da Komisija to sredstvo in vsa druga sredstva uporabi za zagotovitev tega, da države članice zakonodajo Unije prenesejo pravočasno in pravilno, zlasti ko gre za okoljske primere;
Considers it of the utmost importance that the Commission should use this and all other possible means to guarantee that Member States transpose Union legislation in a timely and correct way, especially with reference to environmental cases;
28. poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi svojega priporočila z 29. junija 2009 o ukrepih za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga nadaljuje spodbujanje najboljših praks pri prenosu zakonodaje o enotnem trgu
Calls on the Commission to continue promoting ‘best practices’ in the transposition of single market legislation, building on its recommendation of 29 June 2009 on measures to improve the functioning of the single market
31. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se Komisija večkrat posluži misij za ugotavljanje dejstev pri preiskavah kršitev na kraju samem, in meni, da je treba stremeti k usklajevanju in sinergijam z misijami Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti Odbora za peticije, hkrati pa spoštovati neodvisnost vsake institucije.
Welcomes the Commission’s greater use of fact-finding missions to investigate infringements in situ and considers that coordination and synergies should be sought with the missions carried out by the EP, notably the Committee on Petitions, whilst respecting the independence of each institution.
34. je zaskrbljen zaradi velikega števila kršitev na področjih priznanja strokovnih kvalifikacij, storitev in javnih naročil; meni, da bi bilo koristno dodatno razjasniti zakonodajni okvir na teh področjih, da bi nacionalnim organom pomagali pri njegovem izvajanju;
Is concerned about the high number of infringements in the fields of recognition of professional qualifications, services and public procurement; is of the opinion that further clarification of the legal framework in these fields would be useful in order to help national authorities with the implementation process;
41. pozdravlja, da 27. letno poročilo vsebuje poseben razdelek o peticijah, kakor je zaprosil Parlament, v katerem je Komisija razčlenila prejete nove peticije in ugotovila, da „čeprav večina peticij ne zadeva kršitev, pa vsebujejo uporabne informacije za Parlament in Komisijo o interesih državljanov“.
Welcomes the specific section on petitions contained in the 27th annual report, as requested by Parliament, in which the Commission gives a breakdown of new petitions received and states that ‘even if most petitions do not concern infringements they provide Parliament and Commission with useful information on citizens’ concerns’;
To poročilo ocenjuje, kako je Komisija spremljala uporabo prava Evropske unije v letu 2009.
This report evaluates the Commission’s monitoring of the application of European Union law in 2009.
Osredotoča se na ključno vlogo Komisije kot varuhinje pogodb in na njena pooblastila in dolžnosti za začetek postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državam članicam, ki niso izpolnile obveznosti iz pogodb.
It focuses on the fundamental role of the Commission as ‘Guardian of the Treaty‘ and the Commission’s power and duty to bring infringements proceedings against a Member State that has failed to fulfil an obligation under the Treaty.
Znova izpostavlja, da je postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev sestavljen iz dveh delov: upravnega postopka (preiskava) in sodnega postopka pred Sodiščem.
It reiterates that the infringement procedure consists of two phases: the administrative (investigation) stage and the judicial stage before the Court of Justice.
V upravnem delu igrajo državljani kot pritožniki bistveno vlogo pri zagotavljanju skladnosti prava Unije na terenu.
In the administrative phase the role of citizens (complainants) in ensuring compliance with Union law on the ground is of paramount importance.
Približevanje Evrope njenim državljanom in uporaba tehnik dobrega upravljanja sta med seboj neločljivo povezana.
Bringing Europe closer to its citizens and embracing techniques of good governance are intrinsically linked.
Eno izmed področij neposredne povezanosti med Evropo in državljani EU je ravno administrativni del člena 258 PDEU, po katerem se državljani na Komisijo in Parlament lahko obrnejo za pomoč pri uveljavljanju svojih evropskih pravic.
One of the areas of direct interaction between ‘Europe‘ and the EU citizens is precisely the administrative phase of article 258 TFEU, where citizens turn to the Commission and Parliament for help in order to access their European rights.
Zaradi tega je bistveno, da so pritožniki obravnavani v skladu z načeli dobrega upravljanja
As such, it is vital that complainants are treated according to principles of good administration
Glej članek Melanie Smith z naslovom „Izvajanje, spremljanje, preverjanje, zunanje izvajanje; nazadovanje procesa za ugotavljanje kršitev”, (2008) 33, European Law Review 7777 . .
See Melanie Smith, ‘Enforcement, monitoring, verification, outsourcing: the decline and decline of the infringement process´(2008) 33 European Law Review 7777. .
V poročilu se zato Komisijo poziva k predložitvi postopkovnih pravil v obliki uredbe v skladu z novo pravno podlago iz člena 298 PDEU, da bi okrepili pravice državljanov in zagotovili preglednost.
The report calls therefore on the Commission to propose a ‘procedural law‘ in the form of a regulation under the new legal basis of article 298 TFEU in order to reinforce citizens’ rights and guarantee transparency.
o 27. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava EU (2009)
on the twenty-seventh annual report on monitoring the application of EU law (2009)
6. je zaskrbljen zaradi velikega števila kršitev na področjih priznanja strokovnih kvalifikacij, storitev in javnih naročil; meni, da bi bilo koristno dodatno razjasniti zakonodajni okvir na teh področjih, da bi nacionalnim organom pomagali pri njegovem izvajanju;
Is concerned about the high number of infringements in the fields of recognition of professional qualifications, services and public procurement; is of the opinion that further clarification of the legal framework in these fields would be useful in order to help national authorities with the implementation process;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi svojega priporočila z 29. junija 2009 o ukrepih za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga nadaljuje spodbujanje najboljših praks pri prenosu zakonodaje o enotnem trgu
Calls on the Commission to continue promoting ‘best practices’ in the transposition of single market legislation, building on its recommendation of 29 June 2009 on measures to improve the functioning of the single market
13. poudarja, da so sodni postopki dragi in od potrošnikov in podjetij terjajo preveč časa, hkrati pa predstavljajo zelo veliko breme za sodišča EU in nacionalna sodišča, ki so že tako preobremenjena; poudarja pomen, ki ga imajo za odpravo teh bremen ustrezni mehanizmi alternativnega reševanja sporov;
Points out that judicial proceedings are costly and time-consuming for both individuals and businesses and represent a significant burden on EU and national courts, which are already overloaded; underlines the importance of preventive measures and proper alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in order to reduce this burden;
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Róża, grofica von Thun Und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
2. poudarja, da državljani, organizacije civilne družbe in podjetja še naprej uporabljajo mehanizem vlaganja peticij predvsem zato, da poročajo o nespoštovanju prava EU ter se čezenj pritožijo, pri čemer so to največkrat nanaša na okolje in notranji trg, pogosto pa tudi na področja prostega gibanja, temeljnih pravic in državljanstva;
Points out that the petition mechanism continues to be used by citizens, civil society organisations and enterprises mainly to report on, and complain about, non-compliance with EU law by Member State authorities on different levels, the main issues invoked being related to the environment and the internal market, with freedom of movement, fundamental rights and citizenship featuring prominently;
4. poudarja, da ima Komisija sicer prav, ko poudarja, da so v primeru kršitve prava EU dolžni ukrepati predvsem pravosodni organi držav članic, vendar pa imajo državljani pogosto znatne težave v zvezi s postopki pred nacionalnimi sodišči, ki so lahko predragi ali predolgi; zato meni, da bi bilo treba slediti smernicam iz stockholmskega programa;
Stresses that, whilst the Commission is correct in pointing out that it is primarily the duty of Member States’ judicial systems to act on infringements of EU law, citizens often face considerable difficulties stemming from national court procedures, which can prove expensive or too lengthy; considers, therefore, that the guidelines laid down in the Stockholm Programme should be followed;
7. pozdravlja, da Komisija poudarja potrebo po uspešnejšem preprečevanju kršitev z uporabo vseh orodij, ki so na voljo, ter zagotavljanjem zadostnih sredstev.
Welcomes the Commission’s emphasis on the need to improve the prevention of infringements by using all existing tools and ensuring that sufficient means are available;
11. je seznanjen, da je navzkrižje interesov organov odločanja omenjeno v mnogih peticijah, in odločno podpira sprejetje uredbe EU o upravnih postopkih, ki mora vključevati tudi splošna načela za postopke ugotavljanja kršitev;
Notes that many petitions refer to conflicts of interest among decision-makers and strongly supports the adoption of a regulation on EU administrative procedures which should also include general principles on infringement proceedings;
13. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je z uporabo metode pilotskega projekta skrajšalo obdobje, potrebno za preiskovanje domnevnih kršitev, vendar meni, da mora Komisija Parlamentu pojasniti in posredovati dodatne podatke, da bo lahko presodil o uspešnosti te metode s stališča njenega dejanske spoštovanja v državah članicah;
Welcomes the shorter timeframes needed for investigating alleged infringements through use of the pilot project method, but considers that clarification and further information is needed from the Commission in order for Parliament to be able to judge the success of this method from the point of view of actual compliance by Member States;
15. pozdravlja dejstvo, da se Komisija večkrat posluži misij za ugotavljanje dejstev pri preiskavah kršitev na kraju samem, in meni, da je treba stremeti k usklajevanju in sinergijam z misijami Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti Odbora za peticije, hkrati pa spoštovati neodvisnost vsake institucije.
Welcomes the Commission’s greater use of fact-finding missions to investigate infringements in situ and considers that coordination and synergies should be sought with the missions carried out by the EP, notably the Committee on Petitions, whilst respecting the independence of each institution.