natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. septembra 2008 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic na področju ekstrakcijskih topil, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji živil in njihovih sestavin (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0154 – C6-0150/2008 – 2008/0060(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 September 2008 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the Member States on extraction solvents used in the production of foodstuffs and food ingredients (recast) ( COM(2008)0154 – C6-0150/2008 – 2008/0060(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0154 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0154 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C6-0150/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0150/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju obveze, ki jo je predstavnik Sveta navedel v pismu z dne 17. septembra 2008 o sprejetju predloga, kakor je bil spremenjen, v skladu s prvo alineo drugega pododstavka člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to the undertakings given by the Council representative by letter of 17 September 2008 to adopt the proposal as amended, in accordance with Article 251(2), second subparagraph, first indent of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 51 in 80a svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 80a and 51 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0284/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0284/2008 ),
odobri predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen v skladu s priporočili posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije in kakor je bil spremenjen spodaj;
Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and as amended below;
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Direktivi 2009/32/ES.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive2009/32/EC.)
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. septembra 2008 o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/475/PNZ o boju proti terorizmu ( KOM(2007)0650 – C6-0466/2007 – 2007/0236(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 September 2008 on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism ( COM(2007)0650 – C6-0466/2007 – 2007/0236(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0650 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0650 )
ob upoštevanju člena 29, člena 31(1)(e) in člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Article 29, Article 31(1)(e) and Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0466/2007 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0466/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0323/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0323/2008 ),
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj po pričetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe prednostno obravnavata vse naslednje predloge za spremembo tega besedila v skladu s členom 10 Protokola o prehodnih določbah, priloženega Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo ter s tem povezano izjavo št. 50;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, to treat as a priority any subsequent proposal designed to amend this text pursuant to Article 10 of the Protocol on Transitional Provisions to be annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and pursuant to Declaration No 50 relating to that Protocol;
izjavlja, da je že pripravljen, ko bo začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, za pregled takšnega predloga, če bo potrebno v okviru nujnega postopka in v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti; če bi novi predlog odražal vsebino tega mnenja, bi se lahko uporabljal predvideni postopek iz Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma na področju kodifikacije;
Declares itself already prepared – once the Treaty of Lisbon comes into force – to consider any such proposal if necessary in accordance with the urgency procedure and in close cooperation with Member States' parliaments; should the new proposal reflect the substance of this opinion, the procedure laid down in the interinstitutional agreement as regards codification could apply;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to mnenje posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this opinion to the Council and the Commission.
Dejavnosti Evropske unije v boju proti terorizmu bi bilo treba voditi v tesnem sodelovanju z lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi, ki igrajo ključno vlogo, zlasti na področju preprečevanja, kadar storilci terorističnih dejanj ali napeljevalci k njim živijo v lokalnih skupnostih, kjer se povezujejo s prebivalstvom ter uporabljajo njihove storitve in instrumente demokracije.
Action by the European Union to combat terrorism should be taken in close cooperation with local and regional authorities who have a key role to play, particularly in relation to prevention, in so far as the instigators and perpetrators of terrorist acts live within local communities with whose population they interact, and whose services and instruments of democracy they employ.
Ta predlog predvideva inkriminacijo kaznivih dejanj, povezanih s terorizmom, da bi tako prispeval k splošnejšemu političnemu cilju preprečevanja terorizma z zmanjšanjem razširjanja gradiv, ki
The current proposal foresees the criminalisation of terrorist linked offences in order to contribute to the more general policy objective of prevention of terrorism through reducing the dissemination of those materials
imajo namen in
with the intention and the likelihood of inciting
bi lahko spodbudila posameznike k izvrševanju terorističnih napadov.
persons to commit terrorist attacks.
k terorističnemu kaznivemu dejanju, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti, če je to dejanje namerno.
to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
(Sprememba velja za obravnavano zakonodajno besedilo v celoti, z izjemo uvodne izjave 9.)
(This amendment applies to the entire legislative text under consideration, with the exception of Recital 9; if it is adopted, technical adjustments will have to be made throughout the text.)
ali lahko storijo
or being liable for
k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti, če so ta dejanja storjena nezakonito in namerno.
to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism, when committed intentionally.
Nezmožnost Sveta, da bi dosegel dogovor o procesnih pravicah v kazenskem postopku ovira evropsko pravosodno sodelovanje; ta zastoj je nujno treba odpraviti.
The failure of the Council to agree on procedural rights in criminal proceedings hampers European judicial cooperation; this deadlock urgently needs to be overcome.
Določiti je treba dodatna pravila glede pristojnosti za zagotovitev učinkovitega pregona javnega spodbujanja k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenja in usposabljanja za teroristične dejavnosti, ko so ta dejanja usmerjena v storitev ali pomenijo storitev terorističnega kaznivega dejanja, ki je v pristojnosti države članice.
Additional jurisdictional rules should be established to ensure that public provocation to commit a terrorist offence, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism may be effectively prosecuted when they are directed towards or resulted in the commission of a terrorist offence which is subject to the jurisdiction of a Member State.
Predlog sklepa – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a framework decision – amending act
Ta okvirni sklep dopolnjujejo določbe Konvencije Sveta Evrope o preprečevanju terorizma z dne 16. maja 2005, zato je nujno, da vzporedno z začetkom njegove veljavnosti vse države članice v najkrajšem možnem času ratificirajo to konvencijo.
This Framework Decision is complementary to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of 16 May 2005, and it is therefore essential, in parallel with the entry into force of this Framework Decision, that all Member States ratify that Convention.
Ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu ni mogoče razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju temeljnih pravic ali svoboščin, kot so svoboda izražanja misli, zbiranja ali združevanja,
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict fundamental rights or freedoms such as freedom of expression, assembly, or of association,
svoboda tiska ter svoboda izražanja drugih medijev, ali
freedom of the press and freedom of expression of other media, or
pravica do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja, vključno s pravico do spoštovanja zaupnosti korespondence,
the right to respect for private and family life, including the right to respect of the confidentiality of correspondence,
k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem, novačenje in usposabljanje za teroristične dejavnosti so namerna kazniva dejanja.
to commit terrorist offences, recruitment for terrorism and training for terrorism are intentional crimes.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom, ne spada v področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public
k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem –
to commit terrorist offences,
Zato ni mogoče ničesar v tem okvirnem sklepu razlagati, kot da je namenjeno zmanjšanju ali omejevanju razširjanja informacij za znanstvene, akademske
Therefore, nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as being intended to reduce or restrict the dissemination of information for scientific, academic
ali poročevalske namene.
or reporting purposes.
Izražanje radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom, ne sodi na področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in zlasti ne v opredelitev javnega
The expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism, falls outside the scope of this Framework Decision and, in particular, of the definition of public
k terorističnim kaznivim dejanjem.
to commit terrorist offences,
Člen 1 – točka -1 (novo)
Article 1 − point -1 (new)
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a
z namenom spodbujanja
with the intent to incite
naj se neposredno zavzema za teroristična kazniva dejanja ali ne,
, whether or not directly advocating terrorist offences,
povzroča nevarnost za storitev enega ali več takšnih kaznivih dejanj.
causes a danger that one or more such offences may be committed;
z jasnim in namernim pozivanjem
clearly and intentionally advocating
h kateremu od
the commission of one of the
dejanj, navedenih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h), pri čemer takšno ravnanje
listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h), where such conduct
Člen 1 – točka 1
Article 1 − point 1
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 1 – točka b
Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 − paragraph 1 − point b
nagovarjanje druge osebe, naj stori eno od
to solicit another person to commit one of the
členu 1(1)(a) do (h)
listed in Article 1(1)
ali v členu 2(2);
, or in Article 2(2);
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 2 – točka d
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point d
(d) velike tatvine z namenom storitve enega od
(d) aggravated theft with a view to committing one of the
dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1);
listed in Article 1(1);
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 2 – točka e
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point e
(e) izsiljevanje z namenom storitve enega od
(e) extortion with a view to the perpetration of one of the
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 2 – točka f
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 - paragraph 2 - point f
dejanj, naštetih v členu 1(1)(a) do (h) in členu 2(2)(b).
listed in Article 1(1)(a) to (h) and Article 2(2)(b).
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 - paragraph 3 a (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da so dejanja iz odstavka 2(a) do (c) tega člena inkriminirana ob ustreznem spoštovanju obveznosti glede svobode govora in svobode združevanja, ki jih morajo te države članice spoštovati, še zlasti obveznosti glede svobode tiska in svobode govora v drugih medijih, ter ob spoštovanju zaupnosti korespondence, med drugim tudi vsebine elektronskih sporočil in drugih oblik elektronske korespondence
Member States shall ensure that the acts referred to in paragraph 2(a) to (c) of this Article are criminalised with due respect for the obligations relating to freedom of speech and freedom of association by which those States are bound, in particular the obligations relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression in other media, and with due respect for the confidentiality of correspondence, including the content of e-mail and other kinds of electronic correspondence.
Inkriminacija dejanj iz odstavka 2(a) do (c) ne bo zmanjšala ali omejila razširjanja informacij za znanstvene, akademske, umetniške ali poročevalske namene ter izražanja radikalnih, polemičnih ali spornih stališč v javnih razpravah o občutljivih političnih vprašanjih, vključno s terorizmom.
academic, artistic or reporting purposes, the expression of radical, polemic or controversial views in the public debate on sensitive political questions, including terrorism.
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 3 – odstavek 3 b (novo)
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 3 - paragraph 3 b (new)
Države članice zagotovijo, da je inkriminacija dejanj iz odstavka 2(a) do (c) tega člena izvedena tako, da je sorazmerna z vrsto kaznivega dejanja in okoliščinami, v katerih je bilo to storjeno, glede na zakonite cilje in nujen obstoj tovrstnih ciljev v demokratični družbi, in izključuje vse oblike arbitrarnosti ali diskriminatornega obravnavanja.
Member States shall also ensure that the criminalisation of the acts referred to in paragraph 2(a) to (c) of this Article is effected in a way which is proportionate to the nature and the circumstances of the offence, having regard to the legitimate aims pursued and the necessity thereof in a democratic society, and excludes any form of arbitrariness and discriminatory or racist treatment.
Okvirni sklep 2002/475/PNZ Člen 9 – odstavek 1 a
Framework decision 2002/475/JHA Article 9 - paragraph 1 a
za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3(2)(a) do (c),
the offences referred to in Article 3(2)(a) to (c)
kadar je bilo kaznivo dejanje namenjeno izvršitvi kaznivega dejanja iz člena 1 ali je privedlo do nje in za tako kaznivo dejanje velja sodna pristojnost države članice po katerem koli od meril, določenih v odstavku 1(a) do (e) tega člena.
where the offence was directed towards or resulted in the carrying out of an offence referred to in Article 1 and such offence is subject to the jurisdiction of the Member State under any of the criteria set out in paragraph 1(a) to (e) of this Article."
Države članice se lahko odločijo, da ne bodo uporabljale določb o sodni pristojnosti iz odstavkov 1(b) in (e) ali da jih bodo uporabljale le v posebnih primerih ali okoliščinah
may decide not to apply, or to apply only in specific cases or under specific circumstances, the jurisdictional provisions in paragraph 1(d) and (e) in respect of
za kazniva dejanja iz člena 3(2)(a) do (c)
the offences referred to in Article 3(2)(a) to (c)
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. septembra 2008 o osnutku Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah (16069/2007 – C6-0010/2008 – 2005/0202(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 23 September 2008 on the draft Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (16069/2007 – C6-0010/2008 – 2005/0202(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju osnutka Sveta (16069/2007),
having regard to the draft Council Framework Decision (16069/2007),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 27. septembra 2006 UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
having regard to its position of 27 September 2006 OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 7. junija 2007 UL C 125 E, 22.5.2008, str.
having regard to its position of 7 June 2007 OJ C 125 E, 22.5.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0010/2008 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0010/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 93 in 51 ter člena 55(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 93, 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0322/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0322/2008 ),
odobri osnutek Sveta, kakor je bil spremenjen;
Approves the draft Council Framework Decision as amended;
poziva Komisijo, naj ustrezno spremeni svoj predlog na podlagi člena 250(2) Pogodbe ES;
Calls on the Commission to amend its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
poziva Svet, naj se ponovno posvetuje s Parlamentom, če namerava bistveno spremeniti osnutek ali ga nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the draft substantially or to replace it by another text;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj po pričetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe prednostno obravnavata vse naslednje predloge za spremembo tega besedila v skladu s členom 10 Protokola o prehodnih določbah, priloženega Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo ter s tem povezano izjavo št. 50, zlasti glede pristojnosti Evropskega sodišča;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, to treat as a priority any subsequent proposal designed to amend this text pursuant to Article 10 of the Protocol on Transitional Provisions to be annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and pursuant to Declaration No 50 relating to that Protocol, in particular with respect to the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments of the Member States.
Osnutek okvirnega sklepa Sveta
Draft Council Framework Decision
Člen 16 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki jo uvaja Lizbonska pogodba, bo omogočil utrditev predpisov o varstvu podatkov za namene policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah.
Article 16 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union as introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon will enable data protection rules for the purposes of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters to be strengthened.
da bi bila izključena vsakršna diskriminacija zoper to sodelovanje med državami članicami
in a way excluding any discrimination of this cooperation between the Member States while
, hkrati pa bi bile v celoti spoštovane temeljne pravice posameznikov.
fully respecting fundamental rights of individuals.
Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takšnih podatkov se ne uporablja za obdelavo osebnih podatkov v sklopu dejavnosti izven področja uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti, na primer tiste, ki jih predvideva naslov VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, v vsakem primeru pa ne za obdelavo, povezano z javno varnostjo, obrambo, državno varnostjo ter dejavnostmi države na področjih kazenskega prava.
Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data does not apply to the processing of personal data in the course of an activity which falls outside the scope of Community law, such as those provided for by Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, or, in any case, to processing operations concerning public security, defence, State security and the activities of the State in areas of criminal law.
Izmenjava osebnih podatkov v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, predvsem v skladu z načelom dostopnosti informacij, zapisanim v Haaškem programu, bi morala biti oprta na jasna, (…) pravila, ki bi krepila medsebojno zaupanje med pristojnimi organi ter zagotavljala varstvo zadevnih informacij, hkrati pa bi bile v celoti spoštovane temeljne pravice posameznikov.
The exchange of personal data in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, notably under the principle of availability of information as laid down in the Hague Programme, should be supported by clear (...) rules enhancing mutual trust between the competent authorities and ensuring that the relevant information is protected fully respecting fundamental rights of individuals.
Okvirni sklep se uporablja le za podatke, ki jih pristojni organi zbirajo ali obdelujejo za namen preprečevanja, preiskovanja, odkrivanja ali pregona kaznivih dejanj ali izvajanja kazni.
The Framework Decision applies only to data gathered or processed by competent authorities for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties.
Ta okvirni sklep se ne uporablja za osebne podatke, ki jih je država članica pridobila v okviru področja uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa in ki izvirajo iz te države članice.
This Framework Decision shall not apply to personal data which a Member State has obtained within the scope of this Framework Decision and which originate in that Member State.
Približevanje zakonodaj držav članic nikakor ne bi smelo znižati ravni varstva podatkov, ki jo te zagotavljajo; nasprotno, z njim bi si morali prizadevati za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva znotraj Unije.
The approximation of Member States" laws should not result in any lessening of the data protection they afford but should, on the contrary, seek to ensure a high level of protection within the Union.
Približevanje zakonodaj držav članic nikakor ne bi smelo znižati ravni varstva podatkov, ki jo te zagotavljajo; nasprotno, z njim bi si morali prizadevati za zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva znotraj Unije
The approximation of Member States" laws should not result in any lessening of the data protection they afford but should, on the contrary, seek to ensure a high level of protection within the Union