natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
To pomeni, da se moramo tesno posvetovati glede ukrepov na deviznih trgih in ustrezno sodelovati.
This implies to consult closely in regard to actions in exchange markets and to cooperate as appropriate.
Strokovna literatura kaže, da je v izjemnih okoliščinah sodelovanje, na primer prek posegov v devizne tečaje, lahko učinkovito, zlasti če so taki posegi usklajeni, skladni s temeljnimi ekonomskimi razmerami in uradno komunikacijo ter če se uporabljajo, kadar so neravnovesja deviznih tečajev velika.
The academic literature indicates that cooperation in exceptional circumstances through e.g. foreign exchange interventions can be effective, notably if such in-terventions are concerted, consistent with fundamentals and official communica-tion, and undertaken when exchange rate misalignments are large.
Usklajeni posegi gospodarstev skupine G7 (na primer poseg v zvezi z evrom leta 2000 ali poseg v zvezi z jenom leta 2011) na splošno veljajo kot uspešni s tega vidika.
The con-certed interventions by the G7 economies (such as those of 2000 on the euro or of 2011 on the yen) are broadly deemed as having been successful in this re-spect.
V zvezi z mednarodno vlogo evra sem seznanjen z nevtralnim stališčem, ki ga je leta 1999 zavzela Evropska centralna banka, ki ne poskuša niti ovirati niti spodbujati njegove mednarodne uporabe.
On the international role of the euro, I take note of with the neutral stance adopted by the ECB in 1999, neither trying to hinder nor trying to foster its in-ternational use.
Mednarodna uporaba valut bi morala biti rezultat tržnega procesa.
The international use of currencies should be the outcome of a market-driven process.
Vendar bi bilo, glede na to, da je mednarodni monetarni sistem na prehodu v večpolni valutni sistem, to politiko mogoče revidirati.
However, since the international monetary system is in transition towards a multipolar currency system, this policy could be reviewed.
Skupina G20 kot glavni forum za svetovno gospodarsko upravljanje je imela odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju političnega zagona na visoki ravni za obvladovanje krize, krizno upravljanje in preprečevanje kriz v prihodnosti.
The G20, as the premier forum for global economic governance, has played a crucial role in providing high-level political impetus for crisis containment, cri-sis management and future crisis prevention.
Zato je zelo dobrodošlo, da voditelji skupine G20 poudarjajo pomembnost nadaljnjega sodelovanja v mednarodni politiki za reševanje temeljnih vzrokov finančne krize in ustvarjanje temeljev za zanesljivo svetovno gospodarsko rast.
It is hence I highly welcome that G20 Leaders underline the importance of continued international policy cooperation to address the root causes of the financial crisis and to lay the foundations for sound global eco-nomic growth.
Tudi sam sem se udeležil številnih sestankov finančnih ministrov in guvernerjev centralnih bank držav skupine G20, pa tudi srečanj voditeljev držav skupine G20, in povedati moram, da je visoka zavest o kolektivni odgovornosti držav skupine G20 spodbudna.
Having myself attended many meetings of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors as well as G20 leaders’ summits, I must say that I am encouraged by the high level of collective responsibility by G20 members.
Med raznimi točkami na dnevnem redu skupine G20 bi poudaril naslednje:
Among the various items on the agenda of the G20, I would highlight the fol-lowing:
Prvič, v letošnjem letu je bilo pod francoskim predsedstvom opravljenega veliko dela za krepitev delovanja mednarodnega monetarnega sistema.
First, under the French Presidency this year, a lot of work has been done to strengthen the functioning of the International Monetary System.
Skupaj z mehiškim kolegom sem predsedoval delovni skupini G20 na to temo.
Together with my Mexican colleague I co-chaired a G20 working group on the subject.
Dosegli smo napredek, med drugim na področju krepitve nadzora, oblikovanja skladnih sklepov o upravljanju kapitalskih tokov ter spremljanja in ocenjevanja likvidnosti na svetovni ravni.
We achieved progress nter alia on strengthening surveillance, on devising coherent conclusions on capital flow management as well as on the monitoring and as-sessment of global liquidity.
Po mojem mnenju je pomemben dosežek to, da so se države G20 strinjale, da morata obe področji postati – skupaj z zadevami, povezanimi z menjalnimi tečaji, in gibali kopičenja rezerv – del rednega nadzora, glede na potencialne zunanje dejavnike, ki jih imajo lahko politike držav na teh področjih na druge.
I regard it as important achievements that G20 countries have agreed that both areas should become – together with exchange rate matters and drivers of reserve accumulation – a regular part of surveillance, given the potential externalities that countries’ policies in these areas can have on others.
Kar zadeva vprašanje likvidnosti na svetovni ravni, bi poudaril, da je zelo pomembno, da se začne redni proces spremljanja in ocenjevanja, ter da lahko centralne banke najbolje spremljajo razvoj likvidnosti na globalni ravni v kontekstu struktur za sodelovanje centralnih bank Banke za mednarodne poravnave v Baslu.
As far as the issue of global liquidity is concerned, I would emphasize that it is indeed important to start a regular process of monitoring and assess-ment and that central banks are best placed to monitor global liquidity develop-ments in the context of the central bank cooperative structures of the BIS in Ba-sle.
Kar zadeva zagotavljanje likvidnosti po velikih pretresih, so se v skupini držav G20 začele razprave, ki se bodo nadaljevale v Mednarodnem denarnem skladu, o tem, ali in kako še naprej krepiti posojilne instrumente Mednarodnega denarnega sklada.
With regard to liquidity provision following major shocks, discussions were started in the G20 and will continue in the IMF on whether and how to further strengthen the IMF’s lending toolkit.
Drugič, voditelji skupine G20 so potrdili ključne sestavine za globalno regulativno reformo, vključno z delom, ki sta ga opravila baselski odbor in odbor za finančno stabilnost.
Second, G20 Leaders endorsed the key building blocks for the global regulatory reform, including the work done by the Basel Committee and the FSB.
Članice skupine G20 morajo zdaj doseči nadaljnji napredek pri izvajanju doseženih sporazumov in zgledno izpolnjevati sprejete zaveze.
It is now crucial for G20 members to make further progress on implementing the agree-ments reached and to lead by example in living up to the commitments made.
Glavna vprašanja vključujejo: (i) polno izvajanje sporazumov Basel II in III v skladu z dogovorjeno časovnico; (ii) izvajanje okvira baselskega odbora za bančni nadzor za sistemsko pomembne banke in širitev okvira za zajem vseh sistemsko pomembnih finančnih institucij; (iii) soglasje s priporočili za krepitev nadzora in regulacije vzporednega bančnega sistema; (iv) polno in dosledno izvajanje priporočil za izvedene finančne instrumente OTC.
Key issues include: (i) fully implement Basel II and III along the agreed time-lines; (ii) implement the BCBS framework for Systemically Important Banks and extend the framework to encompass all SIFIs; (iii) agree on recommenda-tions to strengthen oversight, supervision and regulation of shadow banking sys-tem; (iv) full and consistent implementation of OTC derivative recommenda-tions.
Druga pomembna področja vključujejo zmanjšanje pretiranega zanašanja na bonitetne agencije ob hkratni krepitvi njihove regulacije in nadzora nad njimi ter krepitvi upravljanja in sredstev odbora za finančno stabilnost.
Other important areas include reducing the over-reliance on credit rating agencies while strengthening their regulation and supervision as well as strengthening the governance and resources of the FSB.
Tretjič, okvir skupine G20 za močno, trajnostno in uravnoteženo rast je ključni mehanizem za večstransko sodelovanje.
Third, the G20 Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth is a key mechanism in multilateral cooperation.
Namen tega okvira je pomagati pri upravljanju prehoda iz krize v obdobje močne, trajnostne in uravnotežene svetovne rasti ter odpraviti svetovna neravnovesja, ki so prispevala k finančni krizi.
The aim of this framework is to help manage the transition from crisis response to a strong, sustainable and balanced pattern of global growth as well as to address the global imbalances that con-tributed to the financial crisis.
Ustanovitev treh evropskih nadzornih organov (ESA) predstavlja velik korak naprej.
The establishment of the three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) is a major step forward.
Možnost izdajanja pravno zavezujočih tehničnih standardov na podlagi uredb/direktiv, ki jih Parlament in Svet sprejmeta s soodločanjem, bo omogočila oblikovanje pravilnika EU na področju finančnih storitev, ki bo spodbujal enotne konkurenčne pogoje in prispeval k ustrezni zaščiti deponentov, vlagateljev in potrošnikov v Evropi.
The possibility to issue legally binding technical standards on the ba-sis of regulations / directives adopted by the Parliament and the Council in co-decision will allow creating an EU financial services rulebook, which will pro-mote a level playing field and contribute to the adequate protection of deposi-tors, investors and consumers in Europe.
V vedno bolj tržno usmerjenem in medsebojno povezanem finančnem sistemu je verjetno, da motnje vplivajo na temeljne tržne mehanizme, kot je distribucija likvidnosti, da imajo čezmejen vpliv in da se širijo bolj nepredvidljivo.
In an increasingly market-based and interconnected fi-nancial system, disturbances are likely to affect core market mechanisms, such as the distribution of liquidity, have cross-border implications in a more unpre-dictable manner.
Za ustrezno oceno takšne dinamike je potreben čezmejni sistemski vpogled, kot tudi ustrezna sredstva in znanja za analiziranje finančne stabilnosti, kar lahko zagotovijo centralne banke.
An adequate appreciation of such dynamics requires a cross-border systemic perspective as well as appropriate resources and expertise for financial stability analysis as it is the case with central banks.
Poleg tega so v času finančne krize v ospredje prišle sinergije med centralnim bančnim poslovanjem in funkcijami nadzora, še posebej pri zbiranju in ocenjevanju podatkov.
Moreover, during the financial crisis the synergies between the central banking and the supervisor functions have been evident with particular regard to the gathering and assess-ment of information.
Drugič, ob upoštevanju izkušenj iz obdobja krize se je v številnih državah članicah vloga centralnih bank pri bonitetnem nadzoru močno okrepila.
Second, taking stock of experience during the crisis, in a number of Member States the role of central banks in prudential supervision has been greatly strengthened.
Ti dogodki bi lahko na daljši rok spodbudili dodatni premislek o institucionalni vlogi Evropske centralne banke in možnosti, ki je omenjena v Pogodbi, da se specifične naloge na področju bonitetnega nadzora prenesejo na Evropsko centralno banko, tudi v luči morebitnih nadaljnjih širitev evroobmočja.
Such developments may over time facilitate further considering the institutional role of the ECB and the possibility given by the Treaty to confer specific tasks in the field of prudential supervision upon the ECB, also in the light of possible further enlargement of the euro-area.
To je se izkazalo kot učinkovito pri upravljanju institucionalnih nalog, ki jih opredeljuje Pogodba, in sicer tudi v okviru finančne krize.
This setting has proved effective in managing the insti-tutional tasks assigned by the Treaty also in the context of the financial crisis.
Zagotavlja namreč ustrezen okvir za izvajanje nalog na področju nadzora.
It could provide an appropriate framework for the exercise of supervisory respon-sibilities.
Ta mikrobonitetni nadzor dopolnjuje vloga Evropske centralne banke v novo ustanovljenem Evropskem odboru za sistemska tveganja v zvezi z makrobonitetnim nadzorom.
This microprudential supervision is complemented by the role of the ECB in the newly established ESRB on macroprudential supervision.
Delovanje ECB ter demokratična odgovornost in preglednost
D. Functioning of the ECB and democratic accountability and transparency
Ali menite, da bi se morale različne odgovornosti članov odbora spreminjati, skladno s spremembami nalog in prednostnih nalog ECB?
In your view, should the different responsibilities of Board members change with time, in line with the changes happening in the ECB's tasks and priorities?
Člen 12 Statuta ESCB in ECB („Statut“) določa odgovornosti izvršilnega odbora ECB.
Article 12 of the Statute of the ESCB and the ECB (“the Statute”) lays down the responsibilities of the ECB’s Executive Board.
Ta člen nalaga izvršilnemu odboru izvajanje monetarne politike v skladu z odločitvami, ki jih sprejme Svet ECB, in pripravo sej Sveta ECB.
The article allocates to the Ex-ecutive Board the implementation of monetary policy in accordance with the de-cisions taken by the Governing Council and of the preparation of the meetings of the Governing Council.
Poleg tega člen 11 Statuta določa, da je izvršilni odbor odgovoren za tekoče poslovanje ECB, vendar ne podaja natančne opredelitve izraza „tekoče poslovanje“.
In addition, according to Article 11 of the Statute the Executive Board is responsible for the current business of the ECB, without however, giving an exact definition of ‘current business’.
Oba člena se nanašata na izvršilni odbor kot celoto in ne dodeljujeta posebnih nalog posameznim članom izvršilnega odbora kot kolegijskega organa, ki sprejema odločitve.
Both articles refer to the Executive Board as a whole and do not allocate specific tasks to individual Executive Board members, given that the Executive Board is a collegiate decision-making body.
To pomeni, da odločitve sprejema izvršilni odbor kot celota in ne posamezni člani izvršilnega organa.
This means that decisions are taken by the entire Executive Board and not by individual Executive Board members.
Poleg tega so vprašanja pogosto medsebojno povezana, odločitve pa morajo upoštevati vse vidike zadeve, tj. pravne, operativne in strateške.
Fur-thermore, issues are often interlinked and decisions need to take into account all aspects of an item, i.e. legal, operational and strategic considerations.
Zato se vsi člani izvršilnega odbora posvečajo vsem področjem njegove pristojnosti, kot so monetarna politika, plačilni sistemi, bankovci itd., in so vključeni vanje.
As a re-sult, all Executive Board members take an interest and are involved in all areas of the Executive Board’s competence, be it monetary policy, payment systems, banknotes, etc.
Vendar se od zunaj zdi, da so se člani izvršilnega odbora medsebojno dogovorili, da bodo za olajšanje učinkovitega upravnega obravnavanja spisov poskrbeli, da bodo posamezna področja poslovanja ECB neposredno dodeljena posameznim članom izvršilnega odbora, ne da bi se odrekli kolektivni odgovornosti celotnega izvršilnega odbora.
At the same time, to facilitate the efficient administrative handling of dossiers, it seems from the outside that the Executive Board members have agreed among themselves to assign to individual ECB business areas direct reporting lines to one Executive Board member, which, however, does not derogate from the col-lective responsibility of the entire Executive Board.
Ta pristop zagotavlja dodatno prednost, saj omogoča kar najboljšo uporabo znanja posameznih članov izvršilnega odbora.
This approach offers the additional advantage to allow making the best possible use of individual Executive Board members’ background.
Dodelitev posameznih področij se občasno pregleduje, zlasti pri spremembah v sestavi izvršilnega odbora.
The allocation of re-porting lines is reviewed from time to time, in particular, when there are changes in the composition of the Executive Board.
Poleg tega prerazporeditev odgovornosti za posamezna delovna področja med člani izvršilnega odbora prispeva tudi h krepitvi kolegialnosti.
In addition, re-shuffling portfolio re-sponsibilities between Executive Board members also contributes to the strengthening of collegiality.
Pogodba izrecno navaja, da je treba pri izbiri članov izvršilnega odbora upoštevati merilo poklicnih izkušenj in strokovnega znanja.
The Treaty exclusively contains the criterion of professional experience and ex-pertise when selecting Executive Board members.
Pogodba navaja, da se člane izvršilnega odbora ECB „imenuje med ljudmi z ugledom in s poklicnimi izkušnjami na monetarnem ali bančnem področju“.
It states that the members of the ECB’s Executive Board ‘shall be appointed among persons of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters’.
Edini razmislek, ki je povezan z državljanstvom in je skoraj samoumeven, je zahteva, da mora biti bodoči član izvršilnega odbora državljan evroobmočja.
The only consideration related to nationality - and that is almost self-evident – is the re-quirement for a prospective Executive Board member to hold euro area national-ity.
Pravna besedila se zavestno izogibajo določitvi kakršnih koli drugih pogojev v zvezi z državljanstvom ali spolom, saj to ne bi bilo v skladu z izborom na podlagi kvalifikacij.
The legal texts consciously refrain from laying down any other pre-requisites related to nationality or gender as this would hardly be in line with a selection based on qualification.
Kljub tem pravnim razmislekom osebno menim, da je raznolikost institucij pomembna; ta je povezana z državljanstvom, spolom, starostjo ter poklicnimi in osebnimi izkušnjami.
Nevertheless these legal considerations, I per-sonally consider diversity of institutions to be important; this relates to nationali-ties, gender, age, professional backgrounds and personal experiences.
Glede na to, da je ECB nadnacionalna institucija, mora svoje odločitve sprejemati izključno v interesu evroobmočja, zato je upoštevanje posebnih nacionalnih interesov izključeno.
Furthermore, given that the ECB is a supranational institution, its decisions must be taken exclusively with a euro area perspective, and this clearly excludes tak-ing into account particular national interests.
Temelj sestave Eurosistema je, da člani odborov ECB, ki sprejemajo odločitve, sodelujejo pri sprejemanju odločitev kot posamezniki in ne zastopajo držav članic, iz katerih prihajajo.
It is a cornerstone of the Eurosys-tem construction that the members of the ECB decision-making bodies partici-pate in the decision-making in their personal capacity and do not represent the Member States from which they come.
Dejstvo, da ima v postopku imenovanja ključno vlogo Evropski parlament, zagotavlja, da je postopek objektiven in v skladu z določenimi merili.
The fact that the appointment procedure gives a prominent role to the European Parliament ensures an objective process in compliance with the stipulated crite-ria.
Kakšno je vaše mnenje o potrebi po zaposlitvi „najboljše ekipe“ (tj. najbolj delujočega kolektiva) članov izvršilnega odbora v nasprotju z zaposlitvijo „najboljših posameznikov“ v ožjem smislu?
What is your view on the need to recruit "the best team" (ie the best functioning collective) of Executive Board members as opposed to simply more narrowly speaking "the best individual"?
Pravni okvir je zelo jasen pri navajanju kvalifikacij, ki jih mora imeti član izvršilnega odbora, zato bi bilo precej tvegano, če bi se uvedla dodatna „mehka“ merila, ki jih je težko meriti in izvajati.
The legal framework is very clear in stating what qualifications are required for an Executive Board member and it would be rather dangerous to invent addi-tional ‘soft’ criteria which are hard to measure and difficult to implement.
Glede na to, da je izvršilni odbor kolegijski organ s kolegijsko odgovornostjo za vse odločitve, ki jih sprejme, mora seveda dobro delovati kot skupina.
Obvi-ously, given that the Executive Board is a collegiate body with collegiate re-sponsibilities for all decisions it takes, it is a prerequisite that it functions well as a team.
Upravičeno je mogoče pričakovati, da morajo imeti osebe, predlagane kot kandidati za člane izvršilnega odbora, poleg priznanega ugleda in poklicnih izkušenj na monetarnem ali bančnem področju tudi omenjene dodatne veščine in znanja.
One should reasonably expect that persons put forward as candidates for the Executive Board would in addition to their recognised standing and profes-sional experience in monetary or banking matters also possess those additional skills.
V tem smislu močno strokovno ozadje/izkušnje posameznikov dejansko ne morejo odtehtati opravljanja nalog v odlično delujočem kolektivu.
In that sense there is per se no trade-off between a strong professional in-dividual background/experience and being part of an excellent functioning col-lective.
Na podlagi svojih poklicnih izkušenj, ki sem jih predstavil tudi na predavanjih na poslovni šoli v Milanu, lahko trdim, da so skupine v povprečju uspešnejše pri doseganju trajnih rešitev in bolj ustvarjalne od posameznikov (razen izjemnih posameznikov, vendar so to redki primeri).
My professional experience – and that was also the demonstrated in courses at the business school in Milan – is, that on average teams are better to achieve lasting solutions and to be creative than individuals (this might be dif-ferent for brilliant individuals, but these are rare species).
Pogodba in Statut ne vsebujeta nobenih določb v zvezi s tem.
Again, the Treaty and the Statute remain silent in this respect.
Seveda oseba „priznanega ugleda in poklicnih izkušenj na monetarnem ali bančnem področju“ ne pomeni nujno predstavnika centralne banke.
Of course, being a person ‘of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary or banking matters’ does not mean that one necessarily has to be a central banker.
Vendar ni presenetljivo, da so bogate izkušnje iz centralnih bank pogosto pomembne in jih je vredno upoštevati.
Nevertheless, it is not surprising that a rich central bank experience is often relevant and has to be taken into account.
Vendar sem sam dokaz, da lahko tudi različna ozadja, v mojem primeru je to ministrstvo za finance, zagotovijo izkušnje, ki jih potrebuje član izvršilnega odbora ECB.
However, I myself am a case in point, proving that a different background, in my case the Ministry of Finance, can also provide the experience necessary to qualify as a member of the ECB’s Ex-ecutive Board.
Moje lastne poklicne izkušnje in znanja mi bodo zagotovo dobro služili na področju delovanja ECB.
My own professional experience and the insights I have gained would certainly serve me well in the ECB context.
To jasno kaže, da so lahko druge poklicne izkušnje in znanja izredno dragoceni.
This shows clearly that other professional backgrounds and experiences can be extremely valuable.
Poklicno ozadje in izkušnje sedanjih in preteklih članov izvršilnega odbora dokazujejo, da raznoliko znanje in izkušnje zagotavljajo dragoceno dodano vrednost v procesu sprejemanja odločitev.
The curricula and the professional experience of the current and past members of the Executive Board prove that a wide variety of expertise and experience certainly adds valuable input to the decision-making process.
Menim, da je konstruktiven socialni dialog eden od ključnih dejavnikov uspeha za dobro delujočo organizacijo.
I believe that a sound social dialogue is one of the key success factors for a well-functioning organisation.
Do tega spoznanja sem prišel v okviru sedanjega delovnega mesta na nemškem Zveznem ministrstvu za finance.
This I have experienced in my current job at the Ger-man treasury.
V celoti sem zavezan sodelovanju v dialogu z osebjem ECB in njihovimi predstavniki ter pričakujem plodno in učinkovito izmenjavo mnenj z njimi, na primer o delovnih razmerah in drugih socialnih zadevah.
I am fully committed to participating in the dialogue with the staff of the ECB as well as with their representatives and I expect fruitful and effec-tive exchanges of view with them, for instance on working conditions and other social matters.
Zlasti podpiram pristop izmenjave informacij s predstavniki osebja in posvetovanja o pomembnih zadevah v zgodnji fazi.
In particular, I support an approach in which information is shared with staff representatives and a consultation on relevant matters is initiated at an early stage.