natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da ti kazalniki, čeprav ne zajemajo vseh vidikov potrošniškega okolja, omogočajo zadostno podlago za določanje prednostnih nalog in ugotavljanje, kje je potrebna nadaljnja analiza, če so podatki, ki jih zagotovijo države članice, popolni in se lahko združujejo na lahko primerljivi podlagi;
Acknowledges that, although the five indicators do not capture all aspects of the consumer environment, they provide a sufficient basis for setting priorities and drawing conclusions as to where further analysis is needed, provided that the information provided by Member States is comprehensive and can be compiled on an easily comparable basis;
meni, da sedanji podatki o pritožbah potrošnikov, cenah, zadovoljstvu, preklapljanju in varnosti še vedno niso dovolj za dokončne ugotovitve in da je potrebnih več visokokakovostnih podatkov, da bi razvili trdno zbirko potrošniških podatkov; poudarja, da je treba te kazalnike dodatno razviti, zbiranje podatkov pa bolje organizirati in pri tem upoštevati razlike med nacionalnimi sistemi;
Considers that the current evidence on consumer complaints, prices, satisfaction, switching and safety is still not sufficient to draw definite conclusions and that more high-quality data are needed in order to develop a solid consumer evidence base; stresses that indicators therefore need to be further developed and data collection needs to be organised taking into account the differences between national systems;
predlaga, naj Komisija, ko bosta peterica osnovnih kazalnikov in z njimi povezana metodologija zadosti razviti, da bosta dali zelo kakovostne rezultate, preuči, ali je v pregled primerno vključiti dodatne dolgoročne kazalnike, kot so kazalniki o tržnih deležih, kakovosti, oglaševanju, preglednosti in primerljivosti ponudbe, pa tudi kazalnike, povezane z izvajanjem in močjo potrošnikov, socialne, okoljske in etične kazalnike ter kazalnike za merjenje pravnega varstva in škode, povzročene potrošnikom; meni pa, da bi bilo to treba razvijati postopoma, da bi zagotovili osredotočenost in razumljivost pregleda, s čimer bi dosegli celovit pristop k varstvu potrošnikov in jim omogočili, da v celoti izkoristijo prednosti notranjega trga;
Suggests that, once the five basic indicators and the associated methodology have been sufficiently developed to produce results of high quality, the Commission should consider including in the Scoreboard additional long-term indicators such as those relating to market shares, quality, advertising, transparency and comparability of offers, indicators related to enforcement and consumer empowerment, social, environmental and ethical indicators, as well as indicators to measure redress and consumer detriment; considers, however, that this should be done gradually in order to ensure a focused and intelligible Scoreboard, with a view to ensuring a more comprehensive approach to consumer protection and enabling consumers to benefit fully from the advantages offered by the internal market;
ponovno poudarja, da bi moral pregled zajemati glavne kategorije potrošniških izdatkov, da bi ugotovili, kateri trgi so najbolj problematični, in se pripravili za dodatno podrobnejšo analizo posameznih sektorjev, zlasti tam, kjer bi podatki razkrili težave, ki so skupne različnim trgom; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo ustrezna finančna sredstva in osebje za nadaljnji razvoj pregleda;
Reiterates that the Scoreboard should cover all the main categories of consumer expenditure, in order to identify the most problematic markets and set the ground for further, more detailed sector-specific analysis, in particular where evidence reveals problems common to different markets; calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Member States to ensure adequate financing and staffing for the further development of the Scoreboard;
se zaveda, da so potrošniki manj zadovoljni s storitvami in imajo pri njih več težav kot pri blagu, kar deloma razkriva večjo kompleksnost pogodbenih razmerij pri storitvah; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede poglobljene analize vseh problematičnih sektorjev, opredeljenih v pregledu; prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo temu po potrebi sledile posebne zakonodajne pobude in priporočila za politiko za države članice, ter naj da povratne informacije Parlamentu;
Is aware that consumers are less satisfied, and experience more problems, with services than with goods, which partly reflects the greater complexity of contractual relations and of delivery in respect of services; urges the Commission to carry out in-depth analyses of all problematic sectors identified in the Scoreboard; calls also on the Commission to ensure that such exercises are followed up, where appropriate, with specific legislative initiatives and policy recommendations for Member States, and to provide feedback to Parliament;
pozdravlja zanimanje in kakovost dela Komisije v njeni študiji o maloprodajnih finančnih storitvah, ki jo je objavila kot nadaljnji ukrep po pregledu; je seznanjen tudi s težavami, ugotovljenimi na področju finančnih storitev, ki so se zaradi finančne krize še poslabšale; pozdravlja zlasti ugotovitve, ki jih je ta študija omogočila na primer v zvezi z velikimi težavami pri preglednosti in primerljivosti stroškov, povezanih s tekočimi računi v Evropski uniji; meni, da je zaradi tega potrebna boljša ureditev tega sektorja;
Welcomes the interest and quality of the work done by the Commission in its study on retail financial services, published as a follow-up to the Scoreboard; notes the problems identified in the field of financial services, further aggravated by the financial crisis; welcomes in particular the revelations which emerged from this study regarding, for example, major problems concerning the transparency and comparability of current-account costs in the EU; considers that all appropriate conclusions should be drawn as to the need for better regulation of this sector;
poudarja, da so sicer pritožbe potrošnikov pomembne za odkrivanje pomanjkljivega delovanja trga, vendar njihova odsotnost ne pomeni vedno, da trgi dobro delujejo, saj se potrošniki v nekaterih državah članicah manj pritožujejo zaradi različne potrošniške tradicije ali pričakovanja, ali bo pritožba uspešna; poudarja, da po drugi strani veliko število pritožb v posamezni državi članici ni nujno znak neuspešnega trga, pač pa je lahko tako zaradi navzočnosti učinkovitih organov za pritožbe ali nedavne kampanje o potrošniških pravicah;
Points out that, while consumer complaints are important in detecting market malfunctioning, an absence of complaints does not always mean that markets are functioning well, since in some Member States consumers have less of a tendency to complain due to different consumer traditions or perceptions of the likelihood of success; points out, on the other hand, that a high number of complaints in a single Member State should not necessarily be interpreted as a sign of a failing market but may be due to the presence of effective complaint-handling bodies or a recent information campaign on consumer rights;
ugotavlja, da je v EU več kot 700 organizacij, ki zbirajo pritožbe potrošnikov, njihovo delo pa je zelo različno urejeno in le malo jih zbira podatke o naravi pritožb in sektorjih; meni, da to ni ustrezno za prepoznavanje morebitnih pomanjkljivosti trga z vidika potrošnika, čeprav zadostuje za svetovanje ali informiranje; poziva vse organe za pritožbe, naj sprejmejo usklajeno metodologijo za razvrščanje potrošniških pritožb in poročanje o njih, ter jih spodbuja, naj sporočajo podatke o pritožbah za vse področja, ki jih Komisija predlaga v osnutku svojega priporočila – priporočena in prostovoljna; meni, da bo razvoj usklajene metodologije državam članicam omogočil, da zberejo več tehtnih podatkov in pridobijo popolnejšo sliko o nacionalnih potrošniških trgih, kar bi pripomoglo k vzpostavitvi vseevropske zbirke podatkov, ki bo omogočila primerjavo med potrošniškimi težavami po vsej EU;
Notes that there are more than 700 third-party organisations collecting consumer complaints in the EU but the arrangements for doing so differ considerably and relatively few such organisations collect data about the nature of the complaint and the sector concerned; considers that, while this might be sufficient for purposes of offering advice or information, it is not at all adequate for identifying potential market failures from a consumer perspective; calls on all complaints bodies, therefore, to adopt a harmonised methodology for classifying and reporting consumer complaints and encourages them to report complaints data corresponding to all fields – recommended and voluntary – proposed by the Commission in its draft recommendation; believes that the development of a harmonised methodology will allow Member States to collect more meaningful data and to construct a more complete picture of national consumer markets, leading to the establishment of an EU-wide database which will enable comparison of consumer problems across the EU;
opozarja na analizo dostopnih podatkov o cenah, ki kaže nerazložljiva čezmejna nihanja pri številnih izdelkih in storitvah; meni, da razlike v cenah, čeprav so pogosto povezane z razlikami v povpraševanju, stopnjo stroškov, davkov ali strukturo stroškov, pogosto tudi kažejo razdrobljenost ali slabo delovanje notranjega trga; predlaga, da je treba, kjer je cena posameznega izdelka višja od referenčne vrednosti, preveriti razmerje med uvoznimi in potrošniškimi cenami ter skrbno preučiti razloge za različno višino cen;
Draws attention to the analysis of the available price data which shows unexplained cross-border variations in a number of goods and services; considers that, although price differences are often linked to differences in demand, expenditure levels, taxes or cost structure, they are also often a sign of internal market fragmentation or malfunctioning; suggests that, where the price of a given product is higher than a benchmark, it is necessary to look at the relationship between import and consumption prices and to examine carefully the reasons for the different price levels;
meni, da dostopni podatki o cenah ne zadostujejo za ustrezno spremljanje notranjega trga, in poziva nacionalne statistične urade in Eurostat, naj sodelujejo s Komisijo, naj priskrbijo več podatkov in nadalje razvijajo svojo metodologijo za zbiranje povprečnih cen primerljivih in tipskih izdelkov in storitev; v zvezi s tem opozarja, da morajo nacionalni statistični uradi potrjevati postopke zbiranja in izračunavanja povprečnih cen in pri teh postopkih bolj sodelovati; poudarja, da se bo s predstavitvijo preglednejših podatkov o cenah zaupanje potrošnikov povečalo, ker bodo med drugim videli, da se rešujejo težave, s katerimi se vsakodnevno srečujejo;
Believes that the available price data are not sufficient for monitoring the internal market properly and calls on the national statistical offices and Eurostat to work together with the Commission to provide more data and to develop further the methodology for collecting average prices of comparable and representative goods and services; recalls, in this context, that national statistical offices need to validate, and to participate more fully in the work of gathering data on, and calculating, average prices; stresses that the provision of more transparent price data would inspire greater confidence among consumers and would show them that their everyday concerns are being addressed;
priznava, da je zadovoljstvo potrošnikov pomemben pokazatelj za razumevanje, kako dobro ali slabo trgi služijo potrošnikom; poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje razvije svojo metodologijo in merilne tehnike za izvajanje anket o zadovoljstvu potrošnikov ter v prihodnje zajame tudi dodatne sektorje;
Acknowledges that consumer satisfaction is an important indicator in understanding how well or poorly markets are delivering for consumers; asks the Commission to develop further its methodology and measuring techniques for carrying out consumer satisfaction surveys and to cover additional sectors in the future;
je prepričan, da je zmožnost preklapljanja med ponudniki bistvena značilnost konkurence v tržnem gospodarstvu; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj ukrepajo za lažje preklapljanje pri vseh pomembnejših maloprodajnih storitvah;
Holds the view that the ability to switch providers is an essential feature of competition in a market economy; urges the Commission and the Member States to take measures to facilitate switching in all important retail services;
ugotavlja, da je zaupanje potrošnikov v varnost izdelkov na splošno veliko, čeprav se to, kako potrošniki razumejo varnost, med državami članicami občutno razlikuje; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj izboljšajo dostopne podatke o varnosti potrošniških izdelkov, ki se zbirajo v glavnem na podlagi poročil o nesrečah in poškodbah zaradi pokvarjenih izdelkov ali v sistemih za opozarjanje o nevarnosti; poudarja, da je treba zlasti biti pozoren na varnost igrač;
Notes that surveys indicate a generally high level of consumer confidence in product safety although consumer perceptions of safety differ significantly between Member States; asks the Commission and the Member States to improve the data currently available on the safety of consumer products, which are compiled mainly on the basis of reported accidents and injuries from defective products, or through risk notification systems; stresses in particular the need for vigilance on the safety of toys;
spodbuja vse države članice, naj prek skupne podatkovne baze sistematično zbirajo in beležijo nesreče ali poškodbe, da bi še bolj okrepile varnost potrošnikov;
Urges all Member States, in the interests of improving consumer safety, to collect systematically and record details of accidents or injuries in a common database;
ugotavlja, da je čezmejna dejavnost v EU precej različno razširjena in čeprav je povprečni izdatek za čezmejne nakupe znaten (737 EUR na osebo na leto), večina (75 %) prodajalcev na drobno prodaja zgolj potrošnikom v svoji državi in le četrtina potrošnikov v EU opravlja čezmejne nakupe; meni, da bi večje zaupanje potrošnikov znatno povečalo raven čezmejne trgovine, čeprav je več strukturnih ovir, na primer jezik, razdalja in razlike v zakonodaji o varstvu potrošnikov; meni, da razvoj čezmejne trgovine ne sme povzročiti zmanjšanja regulacije, pač pa so zaradi njega še toliko bolj potrebna prizadevanja za zagotovitev optimalnega varstva potrošnikov v Evropski uniji;
Notes that the prevalence of cross-border activity still varies significantly across the EU, and although average expenditure on cross-border purchases is considerable (EUR 737 per person per year), the great majority (75%) of retailers sell only to consumers in their own country, while only a quarter of EU consumers make cross-border purchases; considers that, while there are a number of structural barriers, such as language, distance, and differences in consumer protection law, stronger consumer confidence would substantially increase the levels of cross-border trade; considers that the development of cross-border trade should not reduce the level of regulation but, on the contrary, that it renders even more necessary efforts to maintain an optimal level of consumer protection in the EU;
ugotavlja, da se spletno nakupovanje čedalje bolj širi, čezmejna e-trgovina pa se ne razvija tako hitro kot nakupovanje od doma; poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnjih pregledih zajame več podatkov o dejanski stopnji čezmejne prodaje in težavah, s katerimi se srečujejo ti potrošniki;
Takes note of the fact that online shopping is becoming more widespread but cross-border e-commerce is not developing as fast as domestic shopping; asks the Commission to include in future Scoreboards more complete data on the real level of cross-border sales and the problems encountered by cross-border consumers;
ugotavlja, da okoli polovica potrošnikov EU (51 %) meni, da jih veljavni potrošniški ukrepi ustrezno varujejo, več kot polovica (54 %) jih meni, da javni organi dobro varujejo njihove pravice, nekaj več (59 %) pa, da prodajalci in izvajalci storitev spoštujejo njihove pravice;
Notes that just over half of EU consumers (51%) feel that they are adequately protected by existing consumer measures, more than half (54%) believe that public authorities protect their rights well and a slightly higher proportion (59%) believe that sellers and providers respect their rights;
poudarja, da skoraj tretjina (30 %) potrošnikov EU, ki so opravili nakup na daljavo po internetu, telefonu ali pošti, poroča o težavah z dostavo; seznanjen pa je, da je devetim od desetih, ki so poskušali vrniti nakupljeno ali v času za premislek preklicati pogodbo, to uspelo;
Stresses that almost a third (30%) of EU consumers who have made a distance purchase over the Internet, by telephone or by post report that they have experienced delivery problems; notes, however, that nine out of ten of those who tried to return a purchase or to cancel a contract within the cooling-off period managed to do so;
poudarja, da je več držav članic razvilo orodja za spremljanje nacionalnega trga z vidika potrošnika, na primer opazovalne službe za spremljanje cen ali obsežne sisteme za pritožbe za oblikovanje politike, medtem ko druge države članice ne uporabljajo podatkov za spremljanje potrošniških trgov in podatke le s težavo zbirajo; poudarja, da je zato potrebna izmenjava najboljše prakse med državami članicami;
Recalls that several Member States have developed tools, such as price observatories, to monitor their national markets from the consumer perspective or comprehensive complaints systems to inform policymaking, whereas other Member States do not use data to monitor consumer markets and have difficulties in aggregating data; with this in mind, stresses the need for exchanges of best practices between Member States;
poudarja, da bosta velik prispevek nacionalnih statističnih uradov in Eurostata ter tesno sodelovanje med njimi, Komisijo, oblikovalci potrošniške politike, nacionalnimi izvršilnimi organi in organizacijami potrošnikov in podjetij, bistvena za zagotavljanje kakovosti in popolnosti podatkov ter nadaljnji razvoj potrebne zbirke podatkov; poziva Eurostat, države članice in vse zainteresirane strani, naj ukrepajo in omogočijo takšno sodelovanje;
Emphasises that significant input from national statistical offices and Eurostat, as well as close cooperation between these bodies, the Commission, consumer policymakers, national enforcement authorities and consumer and business organisations, will be crucial in ensuring the quality and completeness of data and further developing the evidence base needed; calls on Eurostat, the Member States and all stakeholders to take steps to facilitate such cooperation;
meni, da imajo lahko podatki, pomembni za trg, osrednjo vlogo pri spodbujanju inovacij in konkurenčnosti; zato poudarja, kako pomemben je pregled kot orodje, ki omogoča opredelitev želja in zahtev potrošnikov; opozarja, da ti podatki lahko spodbujajo inovacije, tako da podjetjem dajejo pobudo za vstop na nove trge in povzročijo pritisk nanje, da izboljšajo svoje izdelke in storitve;
Takes the view that market-relevant data can play a crucial role in driving both innovation and competitiveness; emphasises, therefore, the importance of the Scoreboard as an enabling tool for identifying consumer preferences and demands; notes that this data can stimulate innovation by providing businesses with incentives to enter new markets and creating pressure on firms to improve their products and services;
meni, da bi moral biti pregled, ko bo dopolnjen z zanesljivimi in med 27 državami članicami lahko primerljivimi podatki, bogat vir primerljivih podatkov za snovalce nacionalnih politik o konkurenci, varstvu potrošnikov in drugih področij politike ter jim na nacionalni ravni pomagati prepoznati trge, ki ne delujejo dovolj dobro za potrošnike;
Takes the view that the Scoreboard, once backed up by reliable and easily comparable data for the 27 Member States, should serve as a rich source of comparative data for national policymakers in competition, consumer and other policy areas and should help them to identify at national level the markets that do not function well for consumers;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede primerjalno analizo potrošniškega okolja v vseh državah članicah, pri tem pa upošteva razlike v potrošniškem pravu in potrošniški tradiciji; ponovno poudarja, da primerjava potrošniških učinkov med državami članicami in primerjalna analiza potrošniškega okolja po vsej EU pomagata prepoznavati najboljše prakse ter s tem oblikovati notranji trg, ki bo potrošnikom ustrezal;
Calls on the Commission to benchmark the consumer environment in each Member State, taking account of differences in consumer law and consumer traditions; reiterates that comparing consumer outcomes between Member States and benchmarking the consumer environment across the EU helps indentify best practices and ultimately deliver an internal market that works for consumers;
spodbuja vse države članice, naj vsako leto izvedejo široko kampanjo spremljanja trga, da bi prepoznale trge, ki v odnosu do potrošnikov niso uspešni, in priskrbijo popolne podatke, ki bodo Komisiji omogočili spremljanje in primerjavo težav, s katerimi se spoprijemajo potrošniki na notranjem trgu;
Encourages all Member States to carry out a broad market-monitoring exercise on an annual basis in order to identify markets which are failing for consumers and to provide complete data that will allow the Commission to monitor and compare the problems faced by consumers in the internal market;
vztraja, da namen pregleda ne bi smela biti samo boljša potrošniška politika, pač pa da bi moral prispevati k vsem politikam, ki zadevajo potrošnike, in s tem zagotoviti, da bi vključili potrošniške interese v vse politike EU ter cilj trajnostnega razvoja v politiko varstva potrošnikov; poudarja, da bi moral pregled tudi spodbuditi splošnejšo razpravo o vprašanjih potrošniške politike;
Maintains that the Scoreboard should not only be used to deliver a better consumer policy but must also feed through all policies that affect consumers, ensuring thereby a better integration of consumer interests into all EU policies and incorporation of the objective of sustainable development into consumer protection policy; underlines that the Scoreboard should also stimulate a more general debate on consumer policy issues;
poziva Komisijo, naj s podporo držav članic razvije strategijo za boljše sporočanje pregleda širši javnosti, med drugim z omogočanjem dostopa in vidnosti na ustreznih spletnih mestih, ter naj spodbuja ustrezno razširjanje pregleda medijem, nacionalnim organom, potrošniškim organizacijam in drugim zainteresiranim stranem; meni, da je treba pregled še naprej letno objavljati kot brošuro, in sicer v vseh uradnih jezikih EU; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pri evropskih državljanih primerno spodbujajo uporabo spletnega mesta „eYou Guide“, ki ga je Komisija oblikovala nalašč kot vodič po pravicah državljanov;
Asks the Commission to develop, with the support of the Member States, a strategy to communicate the Scoreboard better to a wider audience, inter alia by ensuring that it is easily accessible and visible on relevant websites, and to promote its proper dissemination to the media, national authorities, consumer organisations and other stakeholders; considers that it is necessary to continue annual publication of the Scoreboard in a brochure and to make it available in all the official EU languages; calls on the Commission and Member States to take appropriate steps to promote the use by European citizens of the ‘eYou Guide’ website, which was specially set up by the Commission as a guide to citizens‘ rights;
pozdravlja pet prednostnih področij ukrepanja, ki jih je Komisija navedla v sporočilu o izvrševanju pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov;
Welcomes the five priority action areas identified by the Commission in its communication on the enforcement of the consumer acquis;