natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
27. obžaluje, da ni med cilji te vodilne pobude, da bi postala gospodarnost z viri krovna prednostna naloga politike EU; poudarja, da je nujno vključevanje gospodarnosti z viri na vsa področja, kot so kmetijstvo, transport in energija; vztraja, da se mora EU prizadevati, da bi postala reciklažno gospodarstvo, v katerem so cene oblikovane realno in odražajo resnične okoljske stroške, zagotavljajo zmanjševanje nastajanja odpadkov in vrednotijo ponovno uporabo virov; poudarja, da je okoljska trajnost odvisna od absolutnega zmanjšanja porabe virov; je razočaran, ker vodilna pobuda ne omenja ekološki odtis Evrope, ki je jasen kazalnik netrajnostne porabe virov; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi niz ustreznih kazalnikov, ki jih bo mogoče spremljati v prihodnjem letnem pregledu rasti;
Regrets that this flagship communication fails to set out any targets to put resource efficiency as an overarching EU policy priority; stresses the urgent need to mainstream resource efficiency across policy fields, such as agriculture, transport and energy; insists the EU needs to start moving towards a recycling economy with real pricing that reflects true environmental costs and ensures a reduction in waste production, and the value of reusing resources; stresses that environmental sustainability depends on an absolute reduction in resource use; is disappointed the flagship does not mention Europe’s ecological footprint, as this is a clear indicator of our unsustainable use of resources; calls on the Commission to come up with a set of indicators to this effect so that they can be monitored in the next Annual Growth Survey;
30. je seznanjen s predlogom za celovito industrijsko politiko, ki ga je podala Komisija, in opaža, da je poudarek na obnovitvi konkurenčnosti industrije EU; v tej zvezi poudarja, da je zaradi svetovnih izzivov ter dejanskega pomanjkanja in izčrpavanja virov bistveno, da bo prenova industrije v Evropi temeljila na učinkovitosti virov in energije ter razvoju industrijskih proizvodnih sistemov zaprtega kroga,
Acknowledges the proposal for Integrated Industrial policy proposed by the Commission and notices its focus on restoring EU’s industry competitiveness; stresses, in this respect, that, in the face of the global challenges and the reality of resources scarcity and depletion, it is essential that energy and resources efficiency and the development of close loop industrial production systems are at the basis of the European industrial renewal;
32. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi preverjanje trajnosti sektorskih pristopov v skladu s cilji podnebne in energetske politike EU, z določanjem ambicioznih ciljev za učinkovitost virov, ciljev in instrumentov pa okrepi produktivnosti virov EU in izboljša trajnost, ponovno uporabo, recikliranje in ponovno izdelavo;
Call on the Commission to secure sustainability proofing of the sector specific approaches in line with EU’s climate and energy policy objective, and with the setting of ambitious resource efficiency objectives, targets and instruments to enhance EU’s resource productivity and improve durability, reuse, recycling and remanufacturing;
34. pričakuje tesnejše sodelovanje med državami članicami in spremljanje industrijskih politik na evropski ravni in ravni držav članic po novi Lizbonski pogodbi (člen 173 PDEU o industrijski politiki), v sklopu strategije Evropa 2020 pa izvajanje gospodarskega upravljanja in evropskega semestra;
Looks forward to the implementation of the closer cooperation with Member States and the monitoring of industrial policies at the European and Member State level under the new Lisbon Treaty’s TFEU Article 173 on industrial policy and in the context of the EU 2020 Strategy, the economic governance and the European semester;
o zakonu o medijih na Madžarskem
on media law in Hungary
PE459.635v01-00 B7‑0103/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zakonu o medijih na Madžarskem
PE459.635v01-00 B7‑0103/2011 European Parliament resolution on media law in Hungary
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah ter drugih določb EU in mednarodnega prava, povezanih s spoštovanjem, spodbujanjem in varstvom temeljnih pravic ter svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter še posebej pravico do pluralizma medijev,
– having regard to Articles 2, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and other provisions of the EU and international law related to the respect of, promotion and protection of fundamental rights and of the freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism in particular,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/13/EU z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (Direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah),
– having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive - AVMSD),
– ob upoštevanju Evropske listine o svobodi tiska z dne 25. maja 2009 in delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralizmu medijev v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ), pristopa k pluralizmu medijev v treh korakih, kot ga opredeljuje Komisija, ter neodvisne študije, ki je bila izvedena v imenu Komisije in dokončana leta 2009,
– having regard to the European Charter on Freedom of the Press of 25 May 2009 and the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ), the "three-step approach to media pluralism" defined by the Commission and to the independent study carried out on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji, z dne 22. aprila 2004 o tveganjih kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji, zlasti v Italiji, ter z dne 7. septembra 2010 o novinarstvu in novih medijih – oblikovanje javnega prostora v Evropi,
– having regard to its resolutions of 25 September 2008 of concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union, of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information, and of 7 September 2010 on journalism and new media – creating a public sphere in Europe,
– ob upoštevanju izjav Komisije in vloženih vprašanj Parlamenta in razprav v Evropskem parlamentu 8. oktobra 2009 o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji, ter v odboru LIBE 17. januarja 2011 v zvezi z madžarskim zakonom o medijih,
– having regard to the statements by the Commission and the parliamentary questions tabled and debates held in the European Parliament on 8 October 2009 regarding freedom of information in Italy, and in the LIBE committee on 17 January 2011 regarding the Hungarian media law,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa odbora LIBE, da pozove Agencijo za temeljne pravice, naj izda letno primerjalno poročilo o razmerah na področju svobode, pluralizma in neodvisnega upravljanja medijev v državah članicah EU, ki naj vključuje tudi kazalnike,
– having regard to the decision by the LIBE Committee to request the Fundamental Rights Agency to issue an annual comparative report on the situation of media freedom, pluralism and independent governance in the EU Member States, including indicators,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije UNESCO o zaščiti in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnega izražanja, zlasti njenih členov 5(2), 7 in 11,
– having regard to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, in particular Articles 5(2), 7, and 11,
A. ker je Evropska unija utemeljena na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države, kot je zapisano v členu 2 PEU, in posledično jamči in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je določeno v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, za katere sta medijska svoboda in pluralizem medijev nujna pogoja, in ker te pravice zajemajo svobodo izražanja mnenj in svobodo prejemanja in sporočanja informacij brez nadzora, vmešavanja ali pritiskov javnih organov,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law as spelled out in article 2 TEU and consequently guarantees and promotes freedom of expression and of information, as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, for which media freedom and pluralism are an essential prerequisite, and whereas these rights include freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without control, interference or pressure from public authorities,
B. ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, kot je bilo poudarjeno v nedavnih kritikah med junijem in decembrom 2010 uvedenih zakonodaje o medijih in ustavnih sprememb na Madžarskem, ki so jo podale mednarodne organizacije, na primer OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, strokovna združenja novinarjev, urednikov in založnikov, nevladne organizacije s področja človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Evropska komisija,
B. whereas media pluralism and freedom continues to be a grave concern in the EU and its Member States, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media laws and constitutional changes in Hungary introduced between June and December 2010, expressed by international organisations, such as OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, professional organisations of journalists, editors and publishers, human rights and civil liberties NGOs, as well as by Member States and the European Commission,
C. ker je Komisija izrazila pomisleke in od madžarske vlade zahtevala informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo madžarskega zakona o medijih z direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah ter pravnim redom Skupnosti nasploh, zlasti kar zadeva obveznost o uravnoteženi pokritosti, ki velja za vse ponudnike avdiovizualnih storitev, načelom države izvora, zahtevami za prijavo, in ker se je madžarska vlada odzvala z zagotovitvijo dodatnih informacij o teh zadevah ter tako, da je izrazila pripravljenost za pregled in spremembo zakonov,
C. whereas the Commission has raised doubts and requested information to the Hungarian government in relation to the conformity of the Hungarian media laws with the AVMSD and acquis in general notably in relation to the obligation of balanced coverage applicable to all audiovisual media service providers, the country of origin principle, the registration requirements, and whereas the Hungarian government responded by providing further information into these matters and by declaring their readiness to review the laws and amend them,
in navedel, da nova zakonodaja ogroža pluralizem medijev, ukinja politično in finančno neodvisnost javnih medijev, dolgoročno utrjuje negativne značilnosti za svobodne medije, da sta organ za medije in Svet politično homogena Pismo predstavnika OVSE za svobodo medijev predsedniku odbora EP LIBE, 14. januar 2010.
, indicating that the new legislation undermines media pluralism, abolishes the political and financial independence of public service media, cements the negative features for free media for the long term, that the Media Authority and Council are politically homogeneous Letter by OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media to the EP Chairman of the LIBE committee, 14.01.2010.
in izvajata razširjen in centraliziran vladni in politični nadzor nad vsemi mediji; nadaljnji pomisleki zadevajo med drugim nesorazmerne in izredno stroge kazni za prekrške iz spornih in neopredeljenih razlogov, nemožnost avtomatične prekinitve kazni, ki jo naloži organ za medije, v primeru pritožbe nanjo sodišču, kršitev načela zaupnosti novinarskih virov, varstvo družinskih vrednot,
and exert a pervasive and centralized governmental and political control on all media; further concerns are the disproportionate and extreme sanctions for debatable and undefined reasons, the lack of an automatic suspension of sanctions in case of appeal to courts against a Media authority sanction, the violation of the principle of the confidentiality of journalistic sources, the protection of family values, among others,
E. ker je komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice pozval madžarske oblasti, naj pri ponovnem pregledu v zakonodajo o medijih vključijo standarde Sveta Evrope o svobodi izražanja in pluralizmu medijev, ustrezna priporočila odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope, zlasti zavezujoče standarde iz Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice; navedel je uporabo nejasnih definicij, ki se jih lahko narobe razume; ustanovitev politično neuravnoteženega regulativnega ustroja z nesorazmernimi pooblastili in pomanjkanje popolnega sodnega nadzora, ogrožanje neodvisnosti javnih radiodifuznih medijev in zmanjševanje zaščite novinarskih virov informacij; ker je poudaril, da morajo vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, vključno z opozicijskimi strankami in civilno družbo, imeti možnost smotrnega sodelovanja pri pregledu te zakonodaje, ki določa tako bistveni vidik delovanja demokratične družbe http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp
E. whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner on Human rights called the Hungarian authorities to incorporate Council of Europe standards on freedom of expression and media pluralism when reviewing its media laws, the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and notably the binding standards contained in the European Convention on Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights; he referred to the use of unclear definitions that may be subject to misinterpretation; the establishment of a politically unbalanced regulatory machinery with disproportionate powers and lack of full judicial supervision; threats to the independence of public-service broadcast media; and erosion of the protection of journalists’ sources; whereas he stressed the need for all relevant stakeholders, including opposition parties and civil society, to be able to participate in a meaningful manner in the review of this legislation, which regulates such a fundamental aspect of the functioning of a democratic society http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp
F. ker bi bilo treba zato madžarski zakon o medijih nujno pregledati na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Komisije, OVSE in Sveta Evrope, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bo povsem v skladu z zakonodajo EU ter evropskimi vrednotami in standardi o svobodi in pluralizmu medijev ter neodvisnem upravljanju,
F. whereas the Hungarian media laws consequently should be urgently reviewed on the basis of the Commission, OSCE and the Council of Europe remarks and proposals, to ensure that it is fully in conformity with EU law and European values and standards on media freedom, pluralism and independent governance,
G. ker je kljub večkratnim pozivom Parlamenta k direktivi o svobodi in pluralizmu medijev ter neodvisnem upravljanju Komisija doslej odlašala s tem predlogom, ki postaja vedno potrebnejši in nujnejši,
G. whereas despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on media freedom, pluralism and independent governance, the Commission has up to now delayed this proposal, which has become increasingly necessary and urgent,
H. ker bi morale pogoje iz københavnskih meril za članstvo v EU, ki so bili sprejeti junija1993 na Evropskem svetu v Kobenhavnu in ki zadevajo svobodo tiska in izražanja, podpreti vse države članice EU in jih uveljavljati prek zadevne zakonodaje EU,
H. whereas the conditions in the Copenhagen criteria for membership to the EU, established in June 1993 at the Copenhagen European Council relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression, should be upheld by all Member States within the EU and enforced through relevant EU legislation,
I. ker je Sodišče dosodilo v združenih zadevah C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, odstavka 45 in 46, da dostop do informacij državljanom omogoča tesnejše sodelovanje v postopku odločanja, upravi pa v demokratičnem sistemu zagotavlja večjo legitimnost, učinkovitost in odgovornost državljanom ter je osnovni pogoj za učinkovito uveljavljanje njihovih demokratičnih pravic,
I. whereas the Court of Justice has held in joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, paragraphs 45 and 46, that access to information enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system and that it ‘is a precondition for the effective exercise of their democratic rights’,
1. je seznanjen s pobudo Komisije, da pozove k pojasnitvi madžarske zakonodaje o medijih in njene skladnosti s Pogodbami in pravom EU, pa tudi z izjavami madžarskih organov, da so zakon pripravljeni spremeniti; obžaluje, da se je Komisija omejeno usmerila le na tri točke pri tem, kako Madžarska izvaja pravni red, in zlasti, da ni navedla člena 30 direktive o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, ter je tako omejila lastno pristojnost za nadzor skladnosti Madžarske z Listino EU o temeljnih pravicah pri izvrševanju prava EU;
Notes the initiative of the Commission to call for clarifications on the Hungarian media laws and their conformity with EU Treaties and law, as well as the announcement made by the Hungarian authorities in relation to their readiness to amend the law; regrets the Commission's limited targeting of only three points in implementation of the acquis by Hungary and especially the absence of reference to article 30 of the AVMSD, thereby limiting its own competence to scrutinise Hungary's compliance with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights while implementing EU law;
3. poziva madžarske organe, naj prekinejo izvajanje novega zakona o medijih, saj dvotretjinska zakonodajna večina vlade tej ne daje pravice, da bi sama odločala o zadevah medijske svobode; namesto tega naj začne s sprejemanjem zakona na novo s razpravo na forumu, ki bo temeljila na enakopravnosti ter vključila opozicijo in civilno družbo, da bi izboljšali zakone tudi na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Evropskega parlamenta, Komisije, OVSE in komisarja Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, priporočil Odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope ter sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to suspend the implementation of the new media laws, as the government's 2/3 legislative majority does not give it a right to decide alone in matters of media freedom; and instead start the legislation anew in parity-based discussion fora that include opposition and civil society, with a view of improving the laws also on the basis of the remarks and proposals made by the European Parliament, the Commission, OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner on Human Rights, recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj določi kratek rok, v katerem naj bi madžarske oblasti spremenile zakon v skladu s točkami, ki so jih podali OVSE, Svet Evrope, Komisija in Evropski parlament, ter naj, če v roku ne bo sprememb, začne postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev;
Calls on the Commission to set a close deadline for the Hungarian authorities to change the law on the points raised by OSCE, the Council of Europe, the Commission and the European Parliament, and shall the deadline not be met, proceed with infringement proceedings;
8. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zagotovita spoštovanje demokratičnih vrednot, vključno s svobodo medijev, v EU in njihovo ohranjanje v osrčju zunanje politike, hkrati pa še naprej podpirata zagovornike svobode medijev v EU in zunaj nje;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure that democratic values including media freedom are respected within the EU and remain central to its foreign policy, while continuing to show support to media freedom campaigners inside and out of the EU;
11. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope ter vladam in nacionalnim parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice in OVSE.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and national parliaments of Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency, OSCE and the Council of Europe.
PE459.636v01-00 B7‑0104/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zakonu o medijih na Madžarskem
PE459.636v01-00 B7‑0104/2011 European Parliament resolution on the media law in Hungary
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji Zlasti člena 2 PEU in členov v zvezi s spoštovanjem, spodbujanjem in varstvom temeljnih pravic, ter členov 11, 25, 49, 56, 103, 107, 114 in 167 Pogodbe ES.
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union In particular its article 2 TEU and those relating to respect for, and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, and to Articles 11, 25, 49, 56, 103, 107, 114 and 167 of the EC Treaty.
, Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah Zlasti člena 11.
, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union In particular Article 11.
in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah Zlasti člena 10.
and the European Convention on Human Rights In particular Article 10.
, zlasti členov o spoštovanju, spodbujanju in varstvu temeljnih pravic ter svobodi izražanja in obveščanja ter še posebej pravici do pluralizma medijev,
, and notably their articles related to the respect, the promotion and protection of fundamental rights and of the freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism in particular,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/13/EU z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov (direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah),
– having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive - AMSD),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralizmu medijev v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ), pristopa k pluralizmu medijev v treh korakih, kot ga Komisija opredeljuje, ter neodvisne študije, ki je bila izvedena za Komisijo in dokončana leta 2009,
– having regard to the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ), the "three-step approach to media pluralism" defined by the Commission and to the independent study carried out on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji, 22. aprila 2004 o nevarnosti kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji in predvsem v Italiji,
– having regard to its resolutions of 25 September 2008 concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union, of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information,
– ob upoštevanju izjav Komisije in vloženih vprašanj Parlamenta ter razprav v Evropskem parlamentu 8. oktobra 2009 in 8. septembra 2010 ter v odboru LIBE 17. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the statements by the Commission and the parliamentary questions tabled and debates held in the European Parliament on 8 October 2009 and on 8 September 2010 and in the LIBE committee on 17 January 2011,