natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je seznanjen z namenom Komisije, da ta cilj doseže s proračunsko podporo, vendar obžaluje, da ni bila skupaj z državami prejemnicami izdelana globalna strategija za vključitev zdravstvenega in izobraževalnega sektorja med prednostne naloge v strateških dokumentih držav; poziva, naj se to vprašanje znova pretehta ob vmesnemu pregledu doseganja cilja 20 %;
Notes the Commission's intention to attain this objective through budgetary support, but regrets that no global strategy has been drawn up jointly with the beneficiary countries to include the health and education sectors in the priorities in the national strategy papers; calls for this issue to be reassessed in the context of the mid-term review to attain the 20% objective;
poudarja, da je mogoče trajno zmanjšati revščino le v razmerah trajnostnega gospodarskega, družbenega in okoljskega razvoja; razen tega poudarja, da morajo biti vse dejavnosti ERS del razvojnega procesa s ciljem ustvarjanja močnega gospodarstva, ki varuje okolje in vsem zagotavlja osnovne storitve socialnega varstva;
Stresses that durable poverty reduction can only be achieved in a situation of sustainable economic, social and environmental development; stresses further that all EDF action should therefore be part of a development process aimed at creating a strong economy that is protective of the environment and where nobody is deprived of basic social services;
poudarja, da trajnostnega razvoja v celoti ni mogoče doseči v vojnih razmerah, civilnih sporih ali med politično nestabilnostjo; zato meni, da bi morale imeti prednost širjenje demokracije in prizadevanje za ohranitev ali podporo miru, pravne države, stabilne in demokratične institucije ter tudi popolno spoštovanje človekovih pravic;
Stresses that sustainable development can never be fully achieved in situations of war, civil strife or political instability; considers therefore that priority should also be given to democracy-building and efforts to maintain or support peace, the rule of law, stable and democratic institutions, as well as full respect for human rights;
meni, da bi morali biti strateški dokumenti držav predmet demokratičnega nadzora, torej se ne bi izdelali in izvajali brez parlamentarnega nadzora; meni, da je prenos strateških dokumentov držav v skupno parlamentarno skupščino AKP-EU pomemben prispevek k doseganju lastništva, enega od ciljev sporazuma iz Cotonouja, in je pozitiven korak pri dodeljevanju institucionalnih pristojnosti skupni parlamentarni skupščini AKP in Evropskemu parlamentu v okviru komitologije; poziva Komisijo, da skupni parlamentarni skupščini zagotovi materialna sredstva za dobro opravljanje njenega dela v zvezi s strateškimi dokumenti držav in da poročilo Komisije o spremljanju obravnava njena mnenja;
Takes the view that national strategy papers should be subject to democratic scrutiny and should not therefore be drawn up and applied without parliamentary scrutiny; considers that passing on national strategy papers to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA) is a significant contribution to the ownership objective enshrined in the Cotonou Agreement and represents a positive step towards conferring institutional power, in the comitology framework, on the JPA and the European Parliament; calls on the Commission to ensure that the JPA has the material resources to successfully complete its work on the national strategy papers and that its opinions are dealt with in Commission follow-up reports;
obžaluje, da Uredba (ES) št. 617/2007 ob pripravi spremljanja in presoje strateških dokumentov držav izrecno ne predvideva udeležbe Evropskega parlamenta, nacionalnih parlamentov, lokalnih organov in nevladnih akterjev niti posvetovanja z njimi; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj takšno posvetovanje sistematično vključita v načrtovanje programov;
Deplores the fact that Regulation (EC) No 617/2007 makes no provision for any explicit procedure to involve or consult the European Parliament, the national parliaments, local authorities and non-state actors (NSAs) in the drafting, monitoring and assessment of national strategy papers; calls on the Council and the Commission to systematically include such consultations in the programming;
obžaluje, da ta tema ni ostala specifično področje ukrepanja; poziva, naj se ta odločitev znova pretehta ob vmesnem pregledu izvajanja ERS v soglasju partnerskih držav AKP;
Deplores the fact that the gender dimension has not been included as a specific area of action; calls for this decision to be reconsidered in the context of the mid-term review of the implementation of the EDF, in agreement with the ACP partners;
poziva Komisijo, naj spoštuje obveznosti v zvezi z enakostjo spolov v ključnih dokumentih politike, kot so Evropsko soglasje o razvoju in skupna strategija Afrika-EU ter seveda sporazum iz Cotonouja, ter tako zagotovi, da bodo vprašanja, povezana s spolom, med prednostnimi področji politik partnerstva AKP-EU, z ustrezno pozornostjo in financiranjem v okviru vključevanja tega načela v politike; vztraja pri večji vidnosti vprašanja vidika spola tako, da se v letno poročilo Komisije doda novo poglavje in uvedejo specifični kazalniki, kar bo omogočilo boljše spremljanje doseženega napredka in nadzor nad njim;
Calls on the Commission to honour commitments made with regard to gender equality in key policy documents such as the European Consensus on Development and the Joint EU-Africa Strategy and indeed in the Cotonou Agreement, and thus to guarantee that gender issues will be included among the political priorities of the ACP-EU partnership, with adequate attention and funding given in the context of gender mainstreaming; insists that the visibility of gender issues be increased by including a relevant chapter and specific indicators in the annual report drawn up by the Commission in order to improve the monitoring and supervision of the progress achieved;
meni, da lahko proračunska podpora prispeva k izkoreninjenju revščine in doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, zlasti kadar so sredstva osredotočena na sektor osnovnega zdravja in izobraževanja; skupaj s Komisijo si želi, da se proračunska pomoč opredeli kot vzvod za povečanje dela nacionalnih proračunov, namenjenega tem sektorjem;
Takes the view that budgetary support can make an effective contribution to the eradication of poverty and achievement of the MDGs, in particular where resources are concentrated on the basic education and health sectors; shares the Commission's avowed determination to apply leverage through budgetary support in order to increase the proportion of national budgets earmarked for these sectors;
želi spomniti, da je proračunska podpora učinkovita in legitimna ob izpolnjevanju strogih predpogojev, zlasti ob okrepljenem sodelovanju med donatorji na eni strani in na drugi strani ob delovanju po demokratičnih pravilih, dobrem upravljanju in če upravljanje z javnimi financami v državi prejemnici nadzira demokratično izvoljen parlament; poziva Komisijo, naj navedene pogoje natančno upošteva, preden se obveže za kakršen koli program proračunske podpore;
Recalls that the effectiveness and legitimacy of budgetary support are conditional upon strict respect for a number of prior conditions, in particular, on the one hand, closer coordination between donors and, on the other, respect for democratic rules, good governance and a system for the management of public finances scrutinised by a democratically elected parliament in the beneficiary countries; calls on the Commission to ensure that these prior conditions are rigorously complied with before initiating any budgetary support programme;
pozdravlja zavezanost Komisije, da poveže proračunsko pomoč neposredno z napredkom pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja in da spodbuja uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja s pogodbami razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja, ki predvidevajo zagotovljeno financiranje v daljšem obdobju, kar prispeva k okrepitvi predvidljivosti pomoči;
Welcomes the Commission's undertaking to link budgetary support directly to progress made in achieving the MDGs and to help attain the MDGs by means of "MDG contracts" providing guaranteed funding over a longer period, thus serving to make aid more predictable;
poziva, da se ocena proračunske pomoči na podlagi zanesljivih in preglednih kazalnikov ter kazalnikov, ki omogočajo merjenje napredka razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja, vključi v letno poročilo, ki se predloži Evropskemu parlamentu, skupni parlamentarni skupščini AKP, nacionalnim parlamentom in nevladnim akterjem;
Calls for budgetary support to be assessed on the basis of transparent, reliable indicators enabling progress on the MDGs to be gauged and for that assessment to be the subject of a report to be submitted annually to the European Parliament, the JPA, the national parliaments, and NSAs;
poziva, naj se znotraj proračunske podpore namenijo posebna sredstva krepitvi zmogljivosti vseh parlamentov držav AKP za proračunsko spremljanje;
Calls for specific resources to be allocated, in the context of budgetary support, to capacity building for all ACP parliaments in the area of budgetary monitoring;
želi spomniti na svojo predanost spodbujanju dobrega upravljanja, zato podpira načelo "premije za dobro upravljanje" v političnem dialogu iz člena 8 sporazuma iz Cotonouja pod pogojem, da so merila in načini njegovega izvajanja jasni in pregledni;
Recalls its attachment to the promotion of good governance and is prepared to endorse the principle of a 'good governance premium' in the framework of the political dialogue defined in Article 8 of the Cotonou Agreement, provided that the criteria for allocating this premium and implementing procedures are clear and transparent;
ugotavlja, da se z več merili, ki jih je Komisija opredelila za dodelitev motivacijskega deleža, daje prednost interesom Severa, in nasprotuje vsakršni obliki pogojevanja pomoči, ki ne temelji izključno na merilih dobrega upravljanja;
Notes that a number of criteria established by the Commission for the breakdown of the incentive tranche primarily reflect the interests of the North and protests against any drift towards a form of conditionality of aid based on criteria which do not relate exclusively to good governance;
izraža zaskrbljenost glede razlage meril gospodarskega in socialnega upravljanja; nasprotuje postavljanju "skritih pogojev" na gospodarskem in socialnem področju ter meni, da analiza zakonodaje in javne politike na tem področju ne sme privesti do zahtev po liberalizaciji in deregularizaciji; priporoča, da se profilom upravljanja dodajo merila, povezana z obstojem in kakovostjo javnih storitev; želi spomniti, da stališče držav ali regij AKP o končni odločitvi o sodelovanju v sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu ne sme biti merilo;
Voices its concern at the interpretation of criteria relating to economic and social governance; protests against the imposition of economic and social 'hidden criteria' and considers that the analysis of legislation and public policy in this area should not lead to liberalisation and deregulation requirements; recommends that criteria relating to the existence and quality of public services should be added to governance profiles; points out that the stance of ACP states or regions on the final choice of whether or not to take part in the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPA) should not constitute a criterion;
poziva Komisijo, da pojasni postopek odločanja, ki ureja dodelitev sredstev motivacijskega deleža, in oblikuje predloge za zagotavljanje informacij Evropskemu parlamentu in nevladnim akterjem na tem področju;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the decision-making that will determine how incentive tranche funds are to be broken down, and to produce proposals to ensure that the European Parliament and NSAs are informed about this matter;
Regionalno povezovanje, pomoč za trgovino in sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu
Regional integration, aid for trade and EPAs
želi spomniti, da se je Evropska unija zavezala, da bo povečala pomoč za trgovino na 2 000 000 000 EUR letno in 50 % te dodatne pomoči namenila državam AKP, to povečanje pa se mora kriti iz dodatnih sredstev; pripisuje velik pomen spoštovanju zavez Evropske unije glede pomoči za trgovino in poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj povzameta trenutno stanje zavez Evropske unije in držav članic za doseganje tega cilja;
Recalls that the EU has undertaken to increase its aid for trade to EUR 2 000 000 000 per year and to devote 50% of this additional aid to ACP countries, with this increase being covered by additional funds; considers it extremely important that the EU honour its commitment on aid for trade and calls on the Commission and the Council to report on the current situation as regards commitments by the EU and the Member States to attain this objective;
vztraja pri tem, da so vse države in regije AKP, neodvisno od njihove končne odločitve o sodelovanju v sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, enakopravno udeležene pri financiranju regionalnih programov združevanja; nasprotuje kakršnemu koli pogojevanju pri dodeljevanju omenjenih sredstev, povezanemu s sodelovanjem v sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu;
Insists that funding from integrated regional programmes should benefit all ACP countries or regions equitably, irrespective of the states' final decision on whether or not to take part in the EPAs; protests against all forms of conditionality linked to participation in an EPA in the allocation of integrated regional programme funds;
ponovno poziva, da se posebne potrebe, povezane s prilagajanjem gospodarstev držav AKP na sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu, zajamejo v dodatnih sredstvih ERS;
Repeats its request that the specific needs linked to adjustment of ACP economies in line with EPAs be met using funds over and above the EDF;
obžaluje, da je opredelitev pravil o vlogi akterjev v programiranju pomoči Skupnosti še posebej ohlapna in dvoumna (glej člen 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 617/2007); poziva, naj predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta, nacionalnih parlamentov, lokalnih organov in nedržavnih akterjev sodelujejo v procesu programiranja, spremljanja in nadzora izvajanja ERS;
Deplores the particularly vague and ambiguous wording of the rules laying down the role of the players in the programming of Community aid (see Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 617/2007); calls for the European Parliament, the national parliaments, local authorities and representative NSAs to be involved in the programming process and in the monitoring and supervision of EDF implementation;
poziva nacionalne parlamente držav EU in AKP, naj izvajajo dosleden parlamentarni nadzor nad izvršnimi organi glede načrtovanja programov ERS; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi dejavno posvetovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti pri vseh korakih oblikovanja in spremljanja strateških dokumentov;
Calls on the national parliaments of the EU Member States and ACP countries to exercise close parliamentary scrutiny of governments as regards the programming of the EDF; calls on the Commission to ensure that the national parliaments are actively consulted at every stage when strategy papers are being drafted and followed up;
ponovno izraža svojo podporo zahtevi skupne parlamentarne skupščine, ki jo je izrazila na svojem 9. zasedanju aprila 2005, da se v interesu trajnostne krepitve dobrega upravljanja, pravne države, demokratičnih struktur in sodelovanja med vlado in opozicijo v pluralističnih demokracijah, ki temeljijo na svobodnih volitvah, ustrezen delež sredstev ERS nameni izobraževanju in političnemu usposabljanju poslancev ter političnih, gospodarskih in socialnih voditeljev;
Reiterates its support for the call by the JPA, made at the Assembly's 9th session in April 2005, for an appropriate percentage of EDF funding to be allocated for the education and political training of parliamentary representatives and political, business, and community leaders in order to promote lasting consolidation of good governance, the rule of law, democratic structures, and interaction between government and opposition in pluralist democracies founded on free elections;
poziva k posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom, nacionalnimi parlamenti in nevladnimi akterji leta 2010 ob vmesni presoji izvajanja ERS in obveščanju Evropskega parlamenta o rezultatih vmesne ocene sklada za spodbujanje naložb;
Calls for the European Parliament, the national parliaments and NSAs to be consulted in 2010 on the mid-term review of the implementation of the EDF and the investment facility;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Komisija pripravila letno poročilo o uporabi pomoči iz naslova ERS, ki je bilo posredovano Evropskemu parlamentu, in ga bo zelo pozorno preučil z vidika učinka pomoči na izkoreninjenje revščine in prispevek k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poziva, da ga prejmejo tudi skupna parlamentarna skupščina, nacionalni parlamenti in predstavniki nevladnih akterjev;
Welcomes the Commission's drafting of an annual report on the implementation of aid provided under the EDF, which is forwarded to the European Parliament; will be particularly vigilant, in examining this annual report, with regard to the impact of aid on the eradication of poverty and its contribution to achieving the MDGs; calls for this annual report also to be forwarded to the JPA, the national parliaments and non-state actors;
pozdravlja namen Komisije in Evropske investicijske banke, da bosta redno ocenjevali rezultate, s posebnim poudarkom na doseženem napredku pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja, in med ocenjevanjem pomoči Skupnosti povezali vse zadevne akterje, vključno z nevladnimi akterji, kar seveda vključuje Evropski parlament, nacionalne parlamente in skupno parlamentarno skupščino; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, na kakšen način in kako pogosto se bodo ocenjevanja izvajala;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB) intend to assess outcomes regularly, focusing particular attention on progress towards achieving the MDGs, and to involve all stakeholders, including non-state actors, when the time comes to assess Community aid, a process in which the European Parliament, the national parliaments and the JPA will naturally be called upon to participate; calls on the Commission to specify what procedures will be employed and how often such assessments will be made;
poudarja, da so v času krize ali konflikta izkušnje ter strokovno znanje poslancev in predstavnikov civilne družbe toliko bolj potrebni, in poziva Komisijo, naj se posvetuje z njimi pred sprejetjem posebnih ukrepov iz člena 8(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 617/2007;
Maintains that, in times of crisis or conflict, the experience and expertise of members of parliament and civil society representatives are particularly valuable and calls on the Commission to consult them before taking special measures within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 617/2007;
je izrazil zadovoljstvo, da je bila omenjena pariška deklaracija o učinkovitosti razvojne pomoči, in vztraja pri usklajevanju načrtovanja izvajanja ERS na podlagi priporočil iz te deklaracije; vendar poudarja, da oblikovanje uravnoteženega in enakovrednega partnerstva med EU in AKP ne more temeljiti le na usklajevanju in prilagajanju donatorjev, ampak mora spodbujati zlasti medsebojne obveznosti in vzajemno zavezanost, zlasti v zvezi z upravljanjem;
Notes with satisfaction that the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness has been mentioned and calls for the programming of the EDF to conform to its recommendations; maintains, however, that a balanced partnership of equals between the EU and the ACP countries cannot be built solely on the strength of harmonisation and an organised grouping of financial backers, but must foster above all reciprocal obligations and mutual accountability, for instance as regards governance;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj udejanji svojo namero natančnega spremljanja napredka na tem področju in pripravi posebno poročilo v okviru priprav na vrhunsko srečanje v Akri septembra 2008; poziva, naj se o presoji učinkovitosti redno pripravlja poročila in se jih posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu;
Encourages the Commission to implement its plan to closely monitor progress in this area and to draw up a specific report in the context of preparations for the Accra summit in September 2008; calls for the assessment of the effectiveness of aid to form the subject of a periodic report, to be submitted to the European Parliament;
se zaveda, da so prizadevanja Komisije za pospešitev izplačil sredstev omogočila občutno večjo stopnjo izvajanja ERS; vendar poudarja, da je na tem področju še potreben napredek, in poziva države članice, naj k tem dejavno prispevajo; poziva Komisijo, naj vsake tri mesece posreduje povzetek izplačil sredstev Evropskemu parlamentu in skupni parlamentarni skupščini;
Acknowledges that the efforts made by the Commission to speed up payments have made it possible to significantly improve the rate of implementation of the EDF; stresses, however, that more needs to be done in this area and calls on Member States to contribute actively to the process; calls on the Commission to draw up, for the European Parliament and the JPA, a three-monthly statement on the disbursement of funds;
se popolnoma strinja z željo po okrepitvi predvidljivosti pomoči v okviru izvajanja ERS;
Fully shares the determination to make aid more predictable when implementing the EDF;
trdno podpira mirovno pomoč za Afriko in poziva, naj pravila o upravljanju tega instrumenta pomenijo okrepitev političnega partnerstva med EU in Afriško unijo v skladu s smernicami nove skupne strategije EU-Afrika;
Strongly supports the introduction of an African Peace Facility and calls for the operating rules for that instrument to reflect a more intensive political partnership between the EU and the African Union, consistent with the main thrust of the new EU-Africa Joint Strategy;
poudarja, da je treba mirovno pomoč za Afriko obravnavati kot instrument skupne zunanje in varnostne politike, ki ne temelji na razvoju po merilih Odbora za razvojno pomoč; v zvezi s tem močno obžaluje odločitev Sveta z dne 11. aprila 2006, ki določa financiranje mirovne pomoči iz ERS;
Maintains that the African Peace Facility should be considered a Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) instrument and does not fall under the heading of development as defined by the DAC criteria; greatly deplores the Council's decision of 11 April 2006 that the peace facility should be financed by the EDF;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj predvidita nadomestno obliko financiranja, najkasneje ob presoji postopka financiranja mirovne pomoči za Afriko, ki naj bi se izvedla leta 2010; poziva, naj se v okviru te presoje posvetujeta z njim;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to provide alternative funding at the latest following the evaluation which should be carried out in 2010 of the African Peace Facility; asks to be consulted within this evaluation;
poziva k posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom in skupno parlamentarno skupščino o akcijskem programu za obdobje 2008–2010 in letnem poročilu Komisije o uporabi sredstev;
Calls for the European Parliament and the JPA to be consulted on the 2008-2010 action programme and the annual activity report on the use of funds, drawn up by the Commission;
priporoča, da se to omogoči drugim finančnim instrumentom EU, in ponovno poziva, da se oblikuje nov vseafriški finančni okvir, ki bo načrtovan in predvidljiv ter bo temeljil na sredstvih ERS, tematskih instrumentih razvojnega sodelovanja in instrumentu evropske sosedske politike, za financiranje in podporo izvajanju nove skupne strategije EU-Afrika;
Recommends that this possibility be made available to other EU financial instruments and repeats its call for a new programmable and predictable pan-African financial package to be established, to be funded by the EDF, the specific DCI instruments, and the European neighbourhood policy instrument with a view to financing and supporting the implementation of the new EU-Africa Joint Strategy;