natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi morala evropska industrija in zainteresirane strani okrepiti naložbe ter korporativno, socialno in okoljsko udejstvovanje ter tesno sodelovati pri oblikovanju ugodnih okvirnih pogojev; meni, da bi morala industrija naložbe in proizvodnjo ohraniti v Evropi, ohraniti lastna prizadevanja na področju raziskav in si prizadevati za trajnostno rast, inovacije in pošteno plačano delo; meni, da bi morala imeti industrija ključno vlogo pri razvoju nove kulture kvalifikacij, zagotavljanju dobrih priložnosti za visokokakovostno usposabljanje in še več trajnostnih inovacij na področju izdelkov in procesov ter v Evropi, kjer je le mogoče, sklepati strateška partnerstva;
Takes the view that European industry and stakeholders should step up their investments, corporate, social and environmental engagements and cooperate closely to develop favourable framework conditions; believes that industry should maintain investment and production in Europe, sustain its own research efforts, and strive towards sustainable growth, innovation and fairly-paid employment; believes that industry has a role to play in developing a new culture of qualifications offering good opportunities for high quality training and even more innovative, sustainable products and processes, and should enter wherever possible into strategic partnerships in Europe;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj izdelajo nove pristope posredovanja za spremljanje in vzpostavitev nove infrastrukture ter izboljšanje udeležbe državljank in državljanov, da bi bila čim prej na razpolago infrastruktura, potrebna za trajnostno prenovo industrijske baze (npr. „pametna“ omrežja, vetrne elektrarne, nove železniške proge);
Calls on the Commission and Member States to devise new mediation approaches to monitoring and building new infrastructure and to implement them so as increase the involvement of citizens, so that infrastructure which is necessary for the sustainable renewal of the industrial base (e.g. smart networks, wind farms, new railway lines) can quickly become possible;
izraža svoje prepričanje, da je svetovna gospodarska kriza jasno pokazala potrebo, da podjetja ravnajo z vso potrebno skrbnostjo in popolnoma v skladu z načeli družbene odgovornosti gospodarskih družb v zvezi z dobrim upravljanjem podjetij in spoštovanjem okoljske in družbene odličnosti;
Expresses its conviction that the world economic crisis has clearly demonstrated the need for companies to act with due diligence in full conformity with the principles of CSR regarding both good corporate governance and respect for the environment and social excellence;
poudarja, da regionalne strukture pomembno prispevajo h krepitvi industrije v Evropi; meni, da so industrijske mreže in inovacijski grozdi (podjetja, univerze, raziskovalna središča, tehnološke storitve, inštituti za usposabljanje itd.) ter mreže podjetij (verige dodane vrednosti, sinergije) in drugih akterjev pomembni za naložbeno odločanje. zato meni, da:
Stresses that regional structures make a major contribution to strengthening industry in Europe; considers that competitive clusters and innovation networks (businesses, universities, research centres, technology services, training institutes, etc.) and linkages among businesses themselves and with other players (value-added chains, synergies) are essential to investment decisions; for this reason, takes the view that:
bi morali biti inovativni grozdi in mreže, predvsem evropski grozdi konkurenčnosti in nova inovacijska partnerstva, ki se bodo začela v letu 2011 v okviru pobude „Unija inovacij“, predvsem na področju ključnih spodbujevalnih tehnologij, deležni večje podpore, da bi na ta način spodbujali usklajeno prenašanje znanja in tehnologije ter raziskave, izboljšali kvalifikacije in infrastrukturo, kar bi morala biti tudi prednostna naloga Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj,
innovation clusters and networks, in particular the European competitiveness clusters and the new innovation partnerships to be launched in 2011 as part of the ‘Innovation Union’ initiative, and mainly in the field of key enabling technologies, should be given greater support, enabling knowledge and technological transfer and research, better training and the infrastructure to be promoted in a coordinated way, something which should also be a priority for the European Regional Development Fund,
bi morale regionalne omrežne strukture in podeželske regije prejemati pomoč EU za krepitev industrijske osnove,
regional network structures and rural regions should receive EU assistance with promoting their industrial base,
bi bilo treba grozde in mreže združiti v okviru evropskih platform, da bi lahko okrepili podporo grozdov in mrež,
the clusters and networks should be brought together under the ‘umbrella’ of European platforms, so that support for clusters and networks can be strengthened,
je treba pobude, kot je združenje županov in pametnih mest, podpirati, saj koristijo industriji ter malim in srednjim podjetjem,
initiatives such as the Covenant of Mayors and Smart Cities should be supported, as industry and SMEs also benefit from these,
bi morala Evropska investicijska banka okrepiti povezavo med industrijsko politiko in teritorialno kohezijo;
the European Investment Bank should strengthen the link between industrial policy and territorial cohesion;
priznava prispevek industrije EU k viziji o socialni, ekonomski in teritorialni koheziji ter meni, da je uspešna industrija bistven pogoj za gospodarsko rast in socialno stabilnost v regijah EU;
Recognises the contribution of EU industry to the vision of socio-economic and territorial cohesion and considers prosperous industry to be a crucial condition for economic growth and social stability in EU regions;
zato poziva k dosledni uporabi in krepitvi razpoložljivih znanstvenih in tehnoloških kompetenc v regijah, zlasti na področju ključnih tehnologij, pa tudi k močnejšemu spodbujanju politike grozdov;
Calls, therefore, for concerted efforts to use and build on the scientific and technological skills which are already available in the regions, in particular in the area of key technologies, and for more emphasis to be placed on cluster policies;
opozarja, da je postopno uvajanje ustrezne digitalne infrastrukture in inovativnih tehnologij strateški element za povečanje konkurenčnosti regij in industrijskih panog EU, da ima sektor IKT ključno vlogo pri krepitvi produktivnosti drugih industrijskih sektorjev, da bi bilo treba sodobno komunikacijsko infrastrukturo z visoko zmogljivostjo prenosa graditi predvsem v manj pokritih regijah, in da bi to lahko privedlo do ugodnega okolja za javne in zasebne naložbe ter bi, kar je še bolj pomembno, pomagalo dvigniti standard digitalne pismenosti za podjetja;
Points out: that the roll-out of appropriate digital infrastructures and innovative technologies is a strategic element for increasing the competitiveness of EU regions and industries; that the ICT sector plays a key role in enhancing the productivity of other industrial sectors; that modern communication infrastructures with high transmission capacity should primarily be built in underserved regions; and that this could result in a favourable environment for public and private investment and, importantly, would help raise the digital literacy standard of business;
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 3, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, povezanih s spoštovanjem, spodbujanjem in varstvom temeljnih pravic, zlasti svobode izražanja in obveščanja ter pravice do pluralnosti medijev,
having regard to Articles 2, 3, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) relating to respect for and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, in particular freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2010/13/EU z dne 10. marca 2010 o usklajevanju nekaterih določb zakonov ali drugih predpisov v državah članicah v zvezi z zagotavljanjem avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev (direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah),
having regard to Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive – AVMSD),
ob upoštevanju Evropske listine o svobodi tiska z dne 25. maja 2009, delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralnosti medijev v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ), pristopa k pluralizmu medijev v treh korakih, kot ga opredeljuje Komisija, ter neodvisne študije, ki je bila izvedena za Komisijo in dokončana leta 2009,
having regard to the European Charter on Freedom of the Press of 25 May 2009, to the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ), to the ‘three-step approach to media pluralism’ defined by the Commission, and to the independent study carried out on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 22. aprila 2004 o nevarnosti kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji, zlasti v Italiji UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju izjav Komisije, vloženih poslanskih vprašanj in razprav v Evropskem parlamentu o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji 8. oktobra 2009 in 8. septembra 2010, ter razprav na skupnem zasedanju Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje 17. januarja 2011 v zvezi z madžarskim zakonom o medijih,
having regard to the statements by the Commission, to the parliamentary questions tabled and debates held in the European Parliament on 8 October 2009, regarding freedom of information in Italy, and on 8 September 2010, and to the discussions held in the joint meeting of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE Committee) and the Committee on Culture and Education (CULT Committee) on 17 January 2011 regarding the Hungarian media law,
ob upoštevanju sklepa Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, da izda letno primerjalno poročilo o razmerah na področju svobode, pluralnosti in neodvisnega upravljanja medijev v državah članicah EU, ki bo vključevalo kazalnike,
having regard to the decision by the LIBE Committee to request the Fundamental Rights Agency to issue an annual comparative report on the situation with regard to media freedom, pluralism and independent governance in the EU Member States, including indicators,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije UNESCO o zaščiti in spodbujanju raznolikosti kulturnega izražanja, zlasti njenih členov 5(2), 7 in 11,
having regard to the UNESCO Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions, in particular Articles 5(2), 7, and 11 thereof,
ker Evropska unija temelji na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države, kot je določeno v členu 2 PEU, zato zagotavlja in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je določeno v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ter priznava pravno vrednost pravic, svoboščin in načel, kot so določena v Listini o temeljnih pravicah, kar je dokazala tudi s podpisom Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, po kateri sta svoboda in pluralizem medijev nujna pogoja; ker te pravice vključujejo svobodo izražanja mnenj ter svobodo prejemanja in sporočanja informacij brez nadzora, vmešavanja ali pritiskov javnih organov,
whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU, and consequently guarantees and promotes freedom of expression and of information, as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in Article 10 of the ECHR, and recognises the legal value of the rights, freedoms and principles as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which it has also demonstrated by acceding to the ECHR, for which media freedom and pluralism are essential prerequisites, and whereas these rights include freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without control, interference or pressure from public authorities,
ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, zlasti v Italiji, Bolgariji, Romuniji, Češki republiki in Estoniji, kot je bilo poudarjeno v nedavnih kritikah zakona o medijih in ustavnih sprememb, sprejetih na Madžarskem med junijem in decembrom 2010, ki so jih izrazile mednarodne organizacije, kot so OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, številna mednarodna in nacionalna združenja novinarjev, uredniki in publicisti, nevladne organizacije, ki delujejo na področju človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Komisija,
whereas media pluralism and freedom continue to be matters of grave concern in the EU and its Member States, notably in Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, the Czech Republic and Estonia, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media law and constitutional changes enacted in Hungary between June and December 2010 which has been voiced by international organisations, such as the OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, by a large number of international and national journalists' organisations, by editors and publishers, by NGOs active in the areas of human rights and civil liberties, and by Member States and the Commission,
ker se strinja s pomisleki OVSE v zvezi s politično homogeno sestavo organa za medije in sveta za medije, časovnim okvirom, izvajanjem ostrega in centraliziranega vladnega, sodnega in političnega nadzora nad vsemi mediji in dejstvom, da so najbolj sporne značilnosti zakonodaje v nasprotju s standardi OVSE in mednarodnimi standardi o svobodi izražanja, na primer odprava politične in finančne neodvisnosti javnih medijev, področje uporabe zakona (materialno in teritorialno) ter odločitev, da se ne opredelijo osnovni pojmi, zaradi česar novinarji ne morejo vedeti, ali morebiti kršijo zakon,
sharing the serious reservations expressed by the OSCE in relation to the politically homogeneous composition of the Media Authority and Media Council, the timeframe, the exertion of a pervasive and centralised governmental, judicial and political control over all media, the fact that the most problematic features of the legislation contravene OSCE and international standards on freedom of expression, for example by doing away with the political and financial independence of public-service media, the scope of the regulation (material and territorial), and the decision not to define key terms, making it impossible for journalists to know when they may be breaking the law,
ker je komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice pozval madžarske oblasti, naj pri pregledu zakona o medijih upoštevajo standarde Sveta Evrope o svobodi izražanja in pluralnosti medijev, ustrezna priporočila odbora ministrov in parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope, zlasti pa zavezujoče standarde iz Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice; ker je navedel uporabo nejasnih opredelitev, ki jih je mogoče narobe tolmačiti, ustanovitev politično neuravnoteženega regulativnega mehanizma z nesorazmernimi pooblastili, ki ni predmet celovitega sodnega nadzora, ogroženo neodvisnost storitev javne radiotelevizije in spodkopavanje zaščite novinarskih virov informacij; ker je poudaril tudi, da bi morale vse zadevne zainteresirane strani, vključno z opozicijskimi strankami in civilno družbo, imeti možnost smiselnega sodelovanja pri pregledu te zakonodaje, ki določa tako pomemben vidik delovanja demokratične družbe http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp.
whereas the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights called on the Hungarian authorities, when reviewing the media law, to take account of Council of Europe standards on freedom of expression and media pluralism, the relevant recommendations of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, and, in particular, the binding standards set out in the ECHR and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights; whereas he referred to the use of unclear definitions which are open to misinterpretation, the establishment of politically unbalanced regulatory machinery with disproportionate powers which is not subject to full judicial supervision, threats to the independence of public-service broadcast media, and erosion of the protection of journalists' sources; whereas he also stressed the need for all relevant stakeholders, including opposition parties and civil society, to be able to participate in a meaningful manner in the review of this legislation, which regulates such a fundamental aspect of the functioning of a democratic society http://www.coe.int/t/commissioner/News/2011/110201Hungary_en.asp.
ker je v drugem mnenju, izdanem 25. februarja 2011, komisar za človekove pravice priporočil celovito revizijo svežnja madžarske zakonodaje o medijih, med drugim zaradi obnovitve natančne zakonodaje, ki bo spodbujala pluralne in neodvisne medije ter še trdneje zagotavljala, da na regulativne mehanizme za medije ne bo mogoče politično vplivati https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1751289.
whereas, in a second opinion issued on 25 February 2011, the Commissioner for Human Rights recommends a ‘wholesale review’ of the Hungarian media law package, with the objectives, inter alia, of reinstating precise legislation promoting a pluralistic and independent media, and strengthening the guarantees that media regulatory mechanisms will be immune from political influence https://wcd.coe.int/wcd/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1751289.
; ker v nadaljevanju ugotavlja, da morajo biti mediji na Madžarskem sposobni opravljati vlogo psa čuvaja v pluralni demokratični družbi, da bi to dosegla pa mora Madžarska spoštovati obveznosti, ki jih je sprejela kot članica Sveta Evrope, ter čim bolje izkoristiti znanje in izkušnje te organizacije na področju svobode izražanja ter medijske neodvisnosti in pluralnosti,
; whereas he further states that the media in Hungary must be able to perform their role as watchdog in a pluralistic democratic society and that in order to achieve this, Hungary should abide by its commitments as a member state of the Council of Europe and make the most of that organisation's expertise in the fields of freedom of expression and media independence and pluralism,
ker bi bilo treba zato nujno opustiti izvajanje madžarskega zakona o medijih ter zakon revidirati na podlagi pripomb in predlogov Komisije, OVSE in Sveta Evrope, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bo povsem v skladu z zakonodajo EU in evropskimi vrednotami ter standardi o svobodi in pluralnosti ter neodvisnem upravljanju medijev,
whereas the Hungarian media law should consequently be suspended as a matter of urgency and reviewed on the basis of the Commission's, OSCE's and Council of Europe's comments and proposals, in order to ensure that it is fully in conformity with EU law and European values and standards on media freedom, pluralism and independent media governance,
ker je kljub večkratnim pozivom Parlamenta k pripravi direktive o svobodi, pluralnosti in neodvisnem upravljanju medijev Komisija doslej odlašala s tem predlogom, ki postaja vedno bolj potreben in nujen,
whereas, despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on media freedom, pluralism and independent governance, the Commission has up to now delayed this proposal, which has become increasingly necessary and urgent,
ker bi köbenhavnska merila za članstvo v EU, ki se nanašajo na svobodo tiska in izražanja in so bila določena junija1993 na Evropskem svetu v Köbenhavnu, morale podpreti vse države članice EU ter jih uveljaviti prek ustrezne zakonodaje EU,
whereas the Copenhagen criteria for EU membership, as established in June 1993 at the Copenhagen European Council, relating to freedom of the press and freedom of expression should be upheld by all EU Member States and enforced through relevant EU legislation,
ker je Sodišče v združenih zadevah C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P v odstavkih 45 in 46 razsodilo, da dostop do informacij državljanom omogoča tesnejše sodelovanje v postopku odločanja, upravi pa v demokratičnem sistemu omogoča, da ima večjo legitimnost, je bolj učinkovita in odgovorna do državljanov, kar je pogoj za učinkovito uveljavljanje njihovih demokratičnih pravic,
whereas, in paragraphs 45 and 46 of its judgment in joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, the Court of Justice has held that access to information enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system and that it ‘is a precondition for the effective exercise of citizens’ democratic rights‘,
poziva madžarske organe, naj ponovno vzpostavijo neodvisno upravljanje medijev in prekinejo vmešavanje države v svobodo izražanja in t.i. uravnoteženo medijsko pokritost, ter meni, da ima prekomerno zakonsko urejanje področja medijev nasprotni učinek ter ogroža dejanski pluralizem v javnem prostoru;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to restore the independence of media governance and halt state interference with freedom of expression and ‘balanced coverage’, and believes that over-regulation of the media is counterproductive, jeopardising effective pluralism in the public sphere;
pozdravlja sodelovanje Komisije z madžarskimi organi pri usklajevanju madžarskih medijev s pravom Skupnosti in pogodbami ter začetek postopka spremembe na nacionalni ravni;
Welcomes the Commission's cooperation with the Hungarian authorities to bring Hungarian media law into conformity with EU Treaties and law, and the commencement of the amending process at national level;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s skrbnim spremljanjem in ocenjevanjem skladnosti madžarskega zakona o medijih, kot je bil spremenjen skladno z evropsko zakonodajo, zlasti z Listino o temeljnih pravicah;
Calls on the Commission to continue the close monitoring and assessment of the conformity of Hungarian media law as amended in accordance with European legislation, particularly with the Charter on Fundamental Rights;
poziva madžarske organe, naj vključijo vse zainteresirane strani v revizijo zakona o medijih in ustave, ki je temelj na pravni državi temelječe demokratične družbe, z ustreznim nadzorom in uravnoteženostjo, ki sta potrebna za varovanje temeljnih pravic manjšine pred tveganjem tiranije večine;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to involve all stakeholders in the revision of the media law and of the Constitution, which is the basis for a democratic society founded on the rule of law, with appropriate checks and balances to safeguard the fundamental rights of the minority against the risk of the tyranny of the majority;