natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vrednosti iz razpredelnice 1 je mogoče v gorskih območjih pomnožiti s faktorjem do 2, če je to upravičeno z nakloni cest, višino in/ali temperaturnimi inverzijami.
The values of Table 1 may be multiplied by a factor of up to 2 in mountain areas to the extent that it is justified by the gradient of roads, altitude and/or temperature inversions.
Neodvisni organ lahko uporabi druge možne načine in uporabi podatke meritev onesnaževal zraka ter lokalno vrednost denarne vrednosti stroškov onesnaževal, če rezultati ne presegajo rezultatov, ki bi jih dobili z zgornjo formulo ali zgornjimi vrednostmi enot za vse razrede vozil.
The independent authority may adopt alternatives methods using data from air pollutant measurement and the local value of the monetary cost of air pollutants, provided that the results do not exceed the results which would have been obtained with the above formulae or the above unit values for any class of vehicles.
Vsi parametri, podatki in druge informacije, brez katerih razumevanje izračuna stroškov onesnaževanja zraka, ki se lahko zaračunajo, ni mogoče, so dostopni javnosti.
All parameters, data and other information necessary to understand how the chargeable air pollution cost is calculated shall be made public.
Stroški obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa
Cost of traffic-based noise pollution
Ko se država članica odloči, da bo v pristojbinah za zunanje stroške upoštevala celotne stroške obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa ali njihov del, neodvisni organ izračuna stroške obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa, ki se lahko zaračunajo, tako da uporabi spodnji formuli ali pa upošteva vrednosti enot iz razpredelnice 2, če so slednje nižje:
When a Member State chooses to include all or part of the cost of traffic-based noise pollution in the external cost charge, the independent authority shall calculate the chargeable cost of traffic –based noise pollution by applying the following formulae or by taking the unit values in Table 2 if the latter are lower:
NCVij (podnevi) = ∑k NCjk x POPk / ADT
NCVij (day) = ∑k NCjk x POPk / ADT
NCVij (ponoči) = n x NCVij (podnevi) pri čemer
NCVij (night) = n x NCVij (day) where
NCVij pomeni stroške obremenitev s hrupom vozila razreda i na cesti vrste j (euro/prevožen kilometer vozila)
NCVij noise cost of vehicle class i on road type j (euro/vehicle.kilometre)
NCjk pomeni stroške obremenitev s hrupom na osebo, izpostavljeno na vrsti ceste j ravni hrupa k (euro/osebo)
NCjk noise cost per person exposed on road type j to noise level k (euro/person)
POPk pomeni prebivalstvo, izpostavljeno dnevni ravni hrupa k na kilometer (oseba/kilometer)
POPk population exposed to daily noise level k per kilometre (person/kilometre)
ADT pomeni povprečni dnevni obseg prometa (vozilo)
ADT average daily traffic (vehicle)
n pomeni nočni korekcijski faktor
n night correction factor
Prebivalstvo, izpostavljeno ravni hrupa k, se vzame iz strateških kart hrupa, navedenih v členu 7 Direktive 2002/49/ES
The population exposed to noise level k shall be taken from the strategic noise maps drafted under Article 7 of Directive 2002/49/EC
Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. junija 2002
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 june 2002 relating to the assessment
o ocenjevanju in upravljanju okoljskega hrupa *
and management of environmental noise
UL L 189, 18.7.2002, str.
OJ L 189, 18.7.2002, p.
Za povprečni dnevni obseg prometa se med težkimi tovornimi vozili in osebnimi avtomobili uporabi ponderirani faktor, ki je manjši ali enak 4.
The average daily traffic shall assume a weighting factor of no more than 4 between heavy goods vehicles and passenger cars.
Razpredelnica 2: Stroški obremenitev s hrupom vozil, ki se lahko zaračunajo (NCV)
Table 2: Chargeable noise cost of vehicles (NCV)
Vir: Priročnik za ocenjevanje zunanjih stroškov v prometnem sektorju, razpredelnica 22║.
Source: Handbook on estimation of external cost in the transport sector, table 22║
Vrednosti iz razpredelnice 2 je mogoče v gorskih območjih pomnožiti s faktorjem do 5, če je to upravičeno z nakloni cest, temperaturnimi inverzijami in/ali učinkom amfiteatra, ki ga imajo doline na širjenje hrupa.
The values of Table 2 may be multiplied by a factor of up to 5 in mountain areas to the extent that it is justified by the gradient of roads, temperature inversions and/or amphitheatre effect of valleys.
Vsi parametri, podatki in druge informacije, brez katerih razumevanje izračuna stroškov obremenitev s hrupom, ki se lahko zaračunajo, ni mogoče, so dostopni javnosti. "
All parameters, data and other information necessary to understand how the chargeable noise cost is calculated shall be made public."
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) )
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast) ( COM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) )
skladno s postopkom, navedenim v členu 251 Pogodbe ...
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty ...
Potrebne so številne bistvene spremembe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije UL L 145, 31.5.2001, str.
A number of substantive changes are to be made to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p.
Javnost omogoča državljanom, da tesneje sodelujejo v postopku odločanja, in zagotavlja, da je uprava deležna večje zakonitosti ter je učinkovitejša in bolj odgovorna državljanu v demokratičnem sistemu.
Openness enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system.
S preglednostjo bi se okrepila tudi načela dobrega upravljanja v institucijah EU, kot to določa člen 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije
Transparency should also strengthen the principles of good administration in the EU institutions as provided for by Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
Ustrezno bi bilo treba opredeliti notranje postopke in poiskati ustrezne finančne in človeške vire za uresničitev načela odprtosti v praksi.
Internal procedures should be defined accordingly and adequate financial and human resources should be made available to put the principle of openness into practice.
[Sprememba 1]
[Am 1 ]
[Sprememba 2]
[Am 2]
[Sprememba 3]
[Am 3]
Posvetovanje Komisije je pokazalo podporo civilne družbe pozivu Evropskega parlamenta k uvedbi instrumenta o resnični svobodi informacij, ki bi veljal za institucionalni okvir Evropske unije v skladu s pravico do dobrega upravljanja iz člena 41 Listine.
The consultation conducted by the Commission showed broad support from civil society for the European Parliament's call for the introduction of a genuine freedom of information instrument applicable to the institutional framework of the European Union, in accordance with the right to good administration laid down Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
[Sprememba 92]
[Am 92]
v skladu s členom 255(2) Pogodbe ES
such access in accordance with Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty
, hkrati pa upoštevati izkušnje, pridobljene z izvajanjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 in resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. aprila 2006 s priporočili Komisiji o dostopu do besedil institucij
and taking into account the experience of the initial implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and of the resolution of the European Parliament of 4 April 2006 with recommendations to the Commission on access to the institutions' texts
Ta uredba ne posega v obstoječe pravice držav članic, sodnih organov ali preiskovalnih teles do dostopa do dokumentov
This Regulation is without prejudice to existing rights of access to documents for Member States, judicial authorities or investigative bodies
V skladu s členom 255(2) Pogodbe ES ta uredba določa splošna načela in omejitve na podlagi javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki urejajo pravico dostopa
In accordance with Article 255(2) of the EC Treaty, this Regulation details the general principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing the right of
do dokumentov
access to documents
in ki bi jih morali upoštevati vsa druga pravila EU
with which all other EU rules should comply
[Sprememba 16]
[Am 16]
V skladu s členoma 28(1) in 41(1) Pogodbe EU velja pravica do dostopa tudi za dokumente, ki se nanašajo na skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter na policijsko sodelovanje in sodelovanje sodstva v kazenskih zadevah. ▌
In accordance with Articles 28(1) and 41(1) of the EU Treaty, the right of access also applies to documents relating to the common foreign and security policy and to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters. ▌
[Sprememba 5]
[Am 5]
Ker vprašanje dostopa do dokumentov ni zajeto v določbe Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo, bi se morali Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija v skladu z Izjavo št. 41 priloženo Sklepni listini Amsterdamske pogodbe, v zvezi z dokumenti, ki zadevajo v navedeni pogodbi zajete dejavnosti, ravnati po tej uredbi.
Since the question of access to documents is not covered by provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission should, in accordance with Declaration No 41 attached to the Final Act of the Treaty of Amsterdam, draw guidance from this Regulation as regards documents concerning the activities covered by that Treaty.
Glede dostopa do dokumentov z informacijami o okolju mora biti ta uredba skladna z Uredbo (ES) št. 1367/2006.
With regard to access to documents containing environmental information, this Regulation should be consistent with Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006.
Svet in Komisija delujeta v svoji zakonodajni funkciji, ko ob dejavnem sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta v obliki uredb, direktiv, okvirnih sklepov ali odločb na podlagi ustreznih določb iz Pogodb sprejmeta pravila splošnega obsega – tudi s prenesenimi pristojnostmi – ki so v državah članicah ali zanje pravno zavezujoča.
The Council and the Commission act in their legislative capacity when, by associating the European Parliament, they adopt, even under delegated powers, rules of general scope which are legally binding in or for the Member States, by means of regulations, directives, framework decisions or decisions, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Treaties.
V skladu z demokratičnimi načeli iz člena 6(1) Pogodbe EU in sodno prakso Sodišča v zvezi z izvajanjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, bi bilo treba
In compliance with the democratic principles outlined in Article 6(1) of the EU Treaty and the case-law of the Court of Justice on the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, wider
Pravna besedila bi morala biti napisana jasno in razumljivo
Legal texts should be drafted in a clear and understandable way
ter objavljena v Uradnem listu Evropske unije; pripravljalni dokumenti in vse z njimi povezane informacije, vključno s pravnimi mnenji in medistitucionalnim postopkom, bi morali biti državljanom enostavno in pravočasno dostopni na spletu.
and published in the Official Journal of the European Union; preparatory documents and all related information, including legal opinions and the interinstitutional procedure, should be made easily accessible by citizens on the Internet in a timely manner.
O boljši praksi pri pripravi zakonodaje, izboljšanih modelih in tehnikah priprave besedil in tehničnih rešitvah za spremljanje življenjskega cikla pripravljalnih dokumentov in njihovega posredovanja institucijam in organom, ki sodelujejo v postopku, se v skladu s to uredbo, objavljeno v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, dogovorijo Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija.
Better law-making practices, drafting models and techniques as well as technical solutions to track the life-cycle of preparatory documents and to share them with the institutions and bodies associated in the procedure should be agreed by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission in accordance with this Regulation and published in the Official Journal of the European Union.
[Sprememba 8]
[Am 8]
Medinstitucionalni register lobistov in drugih zainteresiranih strani je pravo sredstvo za spodbujanje odprtosti in preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka.
An interinstitutional register of lobbyists and other interested parties is a natural tool for the promotion of openness and transparency in the legislative process.
Preglednost zakonodajnega postopka je za državljane izrednega pomena.
Transparency in the legislative process is of utmost importance for citizens.
Komisija bi z dopolnitvijo te uredbe morala predlagati instrument, ki bi ga sprejela Evropski parlament in Svet, o skupnih pravilih, ki urejajo ponovno uporabo informacij in dokumentov s strani institucij s smiselnim izvajanjem načel iz Direktive 2003/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja
By way of complementing this Regulation, the Commission should propose an instrument, to be adopted by the European Parliament and the Council, on common rules governing the re-use of information and documents held by the institutions which implements, mutatis mutandis, the principles outlined in Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public-sector information
[Sprememba 22]
[Am 22]
Brez poseganja v nacionalno zakonodajo v zvezi z dostopom do dokumentov, v skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja pri izvajanju aktov institucij EU, države članice ne bi smele delovati v nasprotju z zastavljenimi cilji iz te uredbe, vključno s stopnjo preglednosti, ki naj bi jo uredba zagotovila na ravni EU, zato bi morale še posebej poskrbeti, da bodo njihovi domači predpisi, s katerimi se izvaja zakonodaja EU, evropskim državljanom in drugim osebam, ki jih to zadeva, omogočili jasno in natančno razumevanje njihovih pravic in obveznosti, nacionalnim sodiščem pa omogočili, da zagotovijo spoštovanje teh pravic in obveznosti.
Without prejudice to national legislation on access to documents, in accordance with the principles of loyal cooperation and legal certainty, when implementing acts of the EU institutions, the Member States should not undermine the attainment of the objectives of this Regulation, including the level of transparency which it seeks to ensure at EU level and should, in particular, ensure that the Member States' national provisions implementing EU legislation should give European citizens and other persons concerned a clear and precise understanding of their rights and obligations and enable national courts to ensure that those rights and obligations are respected.
na podlagi načela lojalnega sodelovanja, ki ureja odnose med institucijami in državami članicami, države članice
Even though it is neither the object nor the effect of this Regulation to amend national legislation on access to documents, it is nevertheless clear that, by virtue of the principle of loyal cooperation which governs relations between the institutions and the Member States,
svojim državljanom na nacionalni ravni zagotoviti vsaj enako raven preglednosti, kot je pri izvajanju pravil EU zagotovljena na ravni EU.
the Member States should grant to their citizens at national level at least the same level of transparency as is granted at EU level when implementing EU rules
paziti, da ne ovirajo
Member States should take care not to hamper
obdelave tajnih dokumentov EU
the processing of EU classified documents
[Sprememba 20]
[Am 20]
Dokumenti v zvezi z nezakonodajnimi postopki, kot so zavezujoči ukrepi brez splošnega obsega ali ukrepi za urejanje notranje organizacije, upravni ali proračunski akti oziroma nezavezujoči dokumenti politične narave (kot so sklepi, priporočila ali resolucije), bi morali biti v skladu z načelom dobrega upravljanja iz člena 41 Listine dostopni enostavno, čeprav bi morali sočasno zagotavljati učinkovitost postopka odločanja v institucijah.
Documents related to non- legislative procedures, such as binding measures without general scope or measures dealing with internal organisation, administrative or budgetary acts, or non-binding acts of a political nature (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions) should be easily accessible in compliance with the principle of good administration outlined in Article 41 of the Charter, while at the same time preserving the effectiveness of the institutions' decision-making process.
Možni so posebni dogovori z zainteresiranimi stranmi v postopku, tudi če dostop javnosti ne bi bil odobren; institucije bi morale ustrezno upoštevati priporočila Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Special arrangements may be made with the interested parties in the procedure even when public access could not be granted; the institutions should duly take into account the recommendations of the European Ombudsman.
[Sprememba 9]
[Am 9]
Institucije bi se morale sporazumeti o skupnih smernicah za evidentiranje notranjih dokumentov, določitev stopnje njihove tajnosti in arhiviranje za zgodovinske potrebe v skladu z načeli iz te uredbe.
The institutions should agree on common guidelines as to the way in which to register their internal documents, to classify them and to archive them for historical needs according to the principles outlined in this Regulation.
Uredba Sveta (EGS, Euratom) št. 354/83 z dne 1. februarja 1983 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo
Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community
bi bilo potem treba razveljaviti.
should then be repealed.
Da bi razvili dejavnosti institucij na področjih, ki zahtevajo določeno stopnjo zaupnosti, je prav, da se vzpostavi celovit varnostni sistem za obdelavo tajnih podatkov EU.
In order to develop the activities of the institutions in areas which require a degree of confidentiality, it is appropriate to establish a comprehensive security system covering the treatment of EU classified information.
V skladu z demokratičnimi načeli iz člena 6(1) Pogodbe EU bi moral imeti Evropski parlament dostop do tajnih podatkov EU, zlasti če je tak dostop potreben za opravljanje zakonodajnih ali nezakonodajnih dolžnosti po Pogodbah.
In accordance with the democratic principles outlined in Article 6(1) of the EU Treaty, the European Parliament should have access to EU classified information notably when such access is necessary for the performance of legislative or non- legislative duties conferred by the Treaties
Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000
o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
Institucije bi morale določiti notranje postopke, pri tem pa ustrezno upoštevati priporočilo Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov
The institutions should define their internal procedures, duly taking into account the recommendation of the European Data Protection Supervisor
Od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 so sodna praksa Sodišča ter odločitve in stališča, ki sta jih sprejela Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, razjasnile razmerje med to uredbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001, v skladu s čimer se mora za zahteve za dokumente, ki vsebujejo osebne podatke, uporabljati Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 ter mora uporaba izjem od pravil, ki dovoljujejo dostop do dokumentov in informacij, za namene varstva osebnih podatkov temeljiti na potrebi po zaščiti zasebnosti in integritete posameznika.
Since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 the case-law of the Court of Justice and decisions and positions adopted by the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor have clarified the relationship between that Regulation and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, to the effect that it is Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 which is to be applied to requests for documents containing personal data and that any application of the exceptions to the rules allowing access to documents and information for the purpose of protecting personal data must be based on the need to protect the privacy and integrity of an individual.
[Sprememba 7]
[Am 7]
Pravica do dostopa do javnih dokumentov ne vpliva na pravico do dostopa do osebnih podatkov v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001.
The right of access to public documents is without prejudice to the right of access to personal data under Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Če oseba zahteva dostop do podatkov, ki se nanjo nanašajo, bi morala institucija na lastno pobudo preučiti, ali je ta oseba upravičena do dostopa v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001.
When a person requests access to data concerning him or her, an institution should on its own initiative examine whether that person is entitled to access under Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
[Sprememba 99]
[Am 99]
Člen 4 Statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta dokumente poslancev Evropskega parlamenta izključuje iz področja uporabe opredelitve pojma "dokument" po tej uredbi.
Article 4 of the Statute for Members of the European Parliament excludes the documents of Members of the European Parliament from the scope of the definition of "document" used in this Regulation.
treba jasna pravila glede razkrivanja dokumentov, ki izvirajo iz držav članic, in dokumentov tretjih strank, ki so del sodnih spisov ali so jih institucije pridobile zaradi svojih posebnih preiskovalnih pooblastil, ki jih imajo na podlagi prava ES.
Clear rules should be established regarding the disclosure of documents originating from the Member States and of documents of third parties which are part of judicial proceedings files or obtained by the institutions by virtue of specific powers of investigation conferred upon them by EC law.
Sodišče je pojasnilo, da obveznost posvetovanja z državami članicami glede zahtev za dostop do njihovih dokumentov ne daje državam članicam pravice, da zavrnejo tak dostop ali da se sklicujejo na nacionalne zakone ali določbe in da lahko institucija, na katero je naslovljena zahteva, zavrne dostop samo na podlagi izjem, določenih v tej uredbi.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities has specified that the obligation for Member States to be consulted in relation to requests for access to documents originating from them does not give them a right of veto, or the right to invoke national laws or provisions, and that the institution receiving a request may refuse access only on the grounds of the exceptions in this Regulation.
Vendar je še vedno treba razjasniti status dokumentov, ki izvirajo od tretjih strank, za zagotovitev, da se informacije, ki se nanašajo na zakonodajne postopke, ne delijo bolj obširno s tretjimi strankami, vključno z upravnimi organi tretjih držav, kot pa z državljani Unije, na katere se bo zakonodaja nanašala.
However, there is still a need to clarify the status of documents originating from third parties in order to ensure that information relating to legislative procedures is not shared more broadly with third parties,( including administrations of third countries) than with Union citizens to whom the legislation will apply.
[Spremembi 93+110]
[Ams 93/110]
V skladu s členom 255(1) Pogodbe ES bi morala Komisija nemudoma omogočiti javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju.
In accordance with Article 255(1) of the EC Treaty, the Commission should immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available.