natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da so nadzorni organi ZDA napredovali pri uvajanju sporazuma Basel II v zvezi z velikimi bankami, vendar obsoja nekatere odmike od sporazuma, ki jih je treba popraviti, saj nalagajo dodatne obveznosti ameriškim podružnicam evropskih bank, s čimer slabijo njihov konkurenčni položaj, ter še nekatera druga vprašanja (v zvezi s finančnimi holdingi in malimi bankami), ki jih bo treba čim prej razjasniti; spodbuja kongres ZDA, da razmisli o skladnejši nadzorni strukturi v bančnem in zavarovalniškem sektorju, kar bi omogočilo lažje usklajevanje med EU in ZDA;
Acknowledges that the US supervisory authorities have made progress in implementing the Basel II agreements with regard to large banks, but criticises the discrepancies that remain to be corrected as they impose additional burdens on American subsidiaries of European banks, thereby reducing their competitiveness, and notes that there are still some issues (financial holdings and small banks) that need to be cleared up as soon as possible; encourages the US Congress, therefore, to consider a more coherent supervisory structure in the banking and insurance sectors so as to facilitate EU-US coordination;
poziva k večjemu sodelovanju nadzornih organov pri nadziranju delovanja čezmejnih finančnih družb in preprečevanju poslovanja finančnih družb s sedežem v državah z nejasnim pravnim redom, s katerimi je težko sodelovati, ter poziva k ukinitvi davčnih oaz;
Calls for greater cooperation between the supervisory bodies in supervising the activities of cross-border financial institutions and preventing action by financial institutions domiciled in jurisdictions that are uncooperative and less than transparent, and calls for the abolition of tax havens;
poziva organe EU in ZDA, naj regulirajo bonitetne agencije na podlagi skupnih načel in metod, da se bo ponovno vzpostavilo zaupanje v bonitete in zagotovila njihova stabilnost; kljub temu opozarja, da mora EU razviti lasten zakonodajni okvir, saj zunajozemeljska uporaba predpisov, ki jih je odobril nadzorni organ ZDA za vrednostne papirje in borzno menjavo (SEC), v ameriških agencijah, ki delujejo na evropskem trgu, ne bi bila sprejemljiva;
Urges the EU and US authorities to regulate credit rating agencies in accordance with jointly held principles and methods so as to restore confidence in ratings and place them on a sound footing; points out however that the EU needs to develop its own regulatory framework as the extra-territorial application of US Securities and Exchange Commission standards to US agencies operating in the European market would not be acceptable;
se strinja s Komisijo, da je treba kreditnim institucijam naložiti, da zadržijo določen delež odobrenih kreditov in s tem prevzamejo del prenesenih tveganj; poziva k obravnavi tega vprašanja v čezatlantskem dialogu, da bi ohranili enake pogoje na mednarodni ravni in omejili sistemska tveganja na svetovnih finančnih trgih; meni, da bi bilo treba sprejeti kodeks ravnanja za državne premoženjske sklade;
Agrees with the Commission that credit originator institutions should be obliged to retain a fraction of the credit issued in order to force them to accept their share of the risks transferred; calls for this issue to be raised in the transatlantic dialogue in order to preserve equal conditions at international level and limit systemic risks on the world financial markets; considers that a code of conduct should be agreed upon for sovereign wealth funds;
poziva novi kongres, naj spremeni predpis ZDA o 100-odstotnem pregledu blaga, ki je namenjeno tej državi, in naj tesno sodeluje z EU, da bo zagotovil izvajanje večplastnega pristopa, ki temelji na dejanskem tveganju; ugotavlja, da je v vedno bolj povezanem svetovnem gospodarstvu še posebej pomembna varna trgovina, vendar meni, da ta grob ukrep predstavlja potencialno novo trgovinsko oviro, ki nalaga velike stroške gospodarskim subjektom in ki nikakor ne bo koristila varnosti dobavne verige;
Calls on the new Congress to modify the US regulation which provides for the scanning of 100 % of inbound cargo and urges it to work closely with the EU to ensure the implementation of a multi-layered approach based on actual risk; notes that secure trade is particularly important in an ever more integrated global economy, but considers that this blunt measure represents a potential new trade barrier, imposing significant costs on economic operators, which will not bring any benefit in terms of supply chain security;
meni, da bi čezatlantski ekonomski svet v Bruslju in Washingtonu lahko organiziral seminarje o vprašanju 100-odstotnega pregleda, da bi se omogočila globlje razumevanje med zakonodajalci EU in ZDA ter hitra rešitev te težave, ki bo sprejemljiva za obe strani;
Believes that the TEC could usefully organise seminars on the 100 % scanning issue in Brussels and Washington in order to foster a deeper understanding between EU and US legislators and to promote an early and mutually acceptable resolution of this problem;
priporoča, naj se na naslednji seji čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta razpravlja o tem, ali bi bilo koristno v pristojnost sveta vključiti več tehničnih vprašanj ter ali je večje sodelovanje med Evropsko unijo in ZDA bistvenega pomena za vzpostavitev učinkovitega sistema omejevanja emisij in trgovanja z njimi; priporoča, da se obstoječa skupna mednarodna merila za energijsko intenzivne industrijske panoge razvijejo ali vključijo v okvir čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta;
Recommends that the next TEC meeting should discuss whether it would be helpful to integrate more technical topics into the scope of the TEC and whether greater cooperation between the EU and the US is essential in order to achieve a workable cap-and-trade-emission system; recommends that existing common international benchmarks for energy-intensive industries should be developed or integrated into the TEC process;
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. marca 2009 Svetu o okrepitvi varnosti in temeljnih svoboščin na internetu ( 2008/2160(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation of 26 March 2009 to the Council on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet ( 2008/2160(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga je predlagal Stavros Lambrinidis v imenu skupine PSE, o okrepitvi varnosti in temeljnih svoboščin na internetu ( B6-0302/2008 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Stavros Lambrinidis on behalf of the PSE Group on strengthening security and fundamental freedoms on the Internet ( B6-0302/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, Konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenih določb o varstvu osebnih podatkov, svobodi izražanja, spoštovanju zasebnega in družinskega življenja in pravici do svobode in varnosti,
having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular the provisions thereof relating to the protection of personal data, freedom of expression, respect for private and family life, as well as the right to liberty and security,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/977/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah UL L 350, 30.12.2008, str.
to Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p.
, Direktive 2003/98/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. novembra 2003 o ponovni uporabi informacij javnega sektorja UL L 345, 31.12.2003, str.
to Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, OJ L 345, 31.12.2003, p.
, predloga Komisije z dne 13. novembra 2007 o Direktivi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 2002/22/ES o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami, Direktive 2002/58/ES o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij in Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov (KOM (2007)0698), Direktive 2006/24/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. marca 2006 o hrambi podatkov, pridobljenih ali obdelanih v zvezi z zagotavljanjem javno dostopnih elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ali javnih komunikacijskih omrežij UL L 105, 13.4.2006, str.
to the Commission's proposal of 13 November 2007 for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2002/22/EC on universal service and users" rights relating to electronic communications networks, Directive 2002/58/EC concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on consumer protection cooperation ( COM(2007)0698 ), to Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/222/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o napadih na informacijske sisteme UL L 69, 16.3.2005, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2005/222/JHA of 24 February 2005 on attacks against information systems, OJ L 69, 16.3.2005, p.
, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2001/413/PNZ z dne 28. maja 2001 o boju proti goljufijam in ponarejanju v zvezi z negotovinskimi plačilnimi sredstvi UL L 149, 2.6.2001, str.
to Council Framework Decision 2001/413/JHA of 28 May 2001 on combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment, OJ L 149, 2.6.2001, p.
, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/919/PNZ z dne 28. novembra 2008 o spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/475/PNZ o boju proti terorizmu UL L 330, 9.12.2008, str.
to Council Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA of 28 November 2008 amending Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA on combating terrorism, OJ L 330, 9.12.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju dela, ki poteka v Svetu Evrope, Organizaciji za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter Organizaciji združenih narodov na področju boja proti kriminalu in kibernetskemu kriminalu in na področju varstva temeljnih pravic in svoboščin tudi na internetu Npr.
having regard to the work undertaken within the framework of the Council of Europe, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United Nations (UN), both as concerns the combating of crime and cybercrime and as concerns the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, including on the Internet E.g.
Konvencija Sveta Evrope o kibernetski kriminaliteti iz dne 23. novembra 2001 in Konvencija Sveta Evrope za varstvo posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov z dne 28. januarja 1981.
Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime of 23 November 2001; Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data of 28 January 1981.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0103/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A6-0103/2009 ),
ker razvoj interneta dokazuje, da ta postaja nujno orodje za spodbujanje demokratičnih pobud, nov forum za politične razprave (na primer e-volilne kampanje in e-volitve), bistven instrument za uveljavljanje svobode izražanja na svetovni ravni (na primer spletni dnevniki) in za razvoj gospodarskih dejavnosti, pa tudi mehanizem za spodbujanje digitalne pismenosti in razširjanje znanja (e-učenje); ker internet prinaša tudi vedno večje število možnosti za ljudi vseh starosti, da lahko denimo komunicirajo z ljudmi iz različnih delov sveta, in je tako razširil ljudem možnosti, da spoznavajo druge kulture ter s tem drugačne ljudi in kulture tudi bolje razumejo; ker se je z internetom povečala tudi raznolikost virov novic, saj posamezniki zdaj lahko spremljajo novice iz različnih delov sveta,
whereas the evolution of the Internet proves that it is becoming an indispensable tool for promoting democratic initiatives, a new arena for political debate (for instance e-campaigning and e-voting), a key instrument at world level for exercising freedom of expression (for instance blogging) and for developing business activities, and a mechanism for promoting digital literacy and the dissemination of knowledge (e-learning); whereas the Internet has also brought with it an increasing number of opportunities for people of all ages to communicate with people from different parts of the world, for example, and has thereby expanded the scope for people to familiarise themselves with other cultures and thus enhance their understanding of other people and cultures; whereas the Internet has also extended the diversity of news sources for individuals as they are now able to tap into the flow of news from different parts of the world,
ker bi morale vlade in organizacije ter institucije, ki delujejo v javnem interesu, zagotoviti primeren zakonodajni okvir in ustrezna tehnična sredstva, da bi državljanom omogočile dejavno in učinkovito udeležbo v upravnih postopkih z aplikacijami e-uprave,
whereas governments and public interest organisations and institutions should provide a suitable regulatory framework and appropriate technical means to allow citizens actively and efficiently to take part in administrative processes through e-government applications,
ker internet v celoti ustreza opredelitvi svobode izražanja iz člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti delu, ki pravi "ne glede na državne meje",
whereas the Internet gives full meaning to the definition of freedom of expression enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially in terms of its 'regardless of frontiers' dimension,
ker bi preglednost, spoštovanje zasebnosti in okolje, kjer vlada zaupanje med zainteresiranimi internetnimi stranmi, morali veljati za nujne elementi pri oblikovanju trajnostnega varnostnega koncepta interneta,
whereas transparency, respect for privacy and an environment of trust amongst I-stakeholders should be considered indispensable elements in order to build a sustainable security vision for the Internet,
ker sta svoboda izražanja in zasebnost na internetu lahko večji, hkrati pa tudi bolj izpostavljeni vdorom in omejitvam, tako s strani zasebnih kot javnih akterjev,
whereas on the Internet, freedom of expression and privacy can at the same time be both better enhanced and more exposed to intrusions and limitations by both private and public actors,
ker se internet, zaradi svobode, ki jo zagotavlja, mnogokrat uporablja tudi za širjenje nasilnih sporočil, kot so bila tista, ki so namenoma spodbujala k terorističnim napadom, ter za spletne strani, ki lahko posebej spodbujajo kazniva dejanja iz sovraštva, in ker se je po vsem svetu povečala nevarnost računalniškega kriminala, ki ogroža posameznike (tudi otroke) in omrežja,
whereas, through the freedom that it provides, the Internet has also been used as a platform for violent messages such as the ones intentionally inciting terrorist attacks, as well as for websites which can specifically incite hate-based criminal acts, and whereas cybercrime threats more broadly have increased worldwide and are endangering individuals (including children) and networks,
ker se je treba učinkovito in odločno zoperstaviti tovrstnemu kriminalu, brez spreminjanja temeljne svobodne in odprte narave interneta,
whereas these crimes must be countered effectively and decisively, without altering the fundamental free and open nature of the Internet,
ker so v demokratični družbi državljani upravičeni do tega, da neprestano opazujejo in presojajo dejanja in prepričanja svojih vlad in zasebnih podjetji, ki jim nudijo storitve; ker to načelo vedno bolj ogrožajo tehnološko napredne tehnike nadzorovanja, ki včasih sovpadajo z odsotnostjo ustreznih pravnih jamstev glede omejevanja njihove uporabe,
whereas, in a democratic society, it is the citizens who are entitled to observe and to judge daily the actions and beliefs of their governments and of private companies that provide them with services; whereas technologically advanced surveillance techniques, sometimes coupled with the absence of adequate legal safeguards regarding the limits of their application, increasingly threaten this principle,
ker imajo posamezniki pravico do svobodnega izražanja na internetu (na primer z vsebinami, ki jih ustvarjajo uporabniki, spletnimi dnevniki in socialnimi omrežji) in ker so internetni iskalniki in ponudniki storitev ljudem znatno olajšali pridobivanje informacij o denimo drugih posameznikih; ker vendarle pride do situacij, ko posamezniki želijo izbrisati podatke, shranjene v tovrstnih podatkovnih bazah; ker morajo biti podjetja zato sposobna posameznikom zagotoviti, da se lahko njihovi osebni podatki izbrišejo iz podatkovnih baz,
whereas individuals have the right to express themselves freely on the Internet (for instance user-generated content, blogs and social networking) and whereas Internet search engines and service providers have made it considerably easier for people to obtain information about, for example, other individuals; whereas, however, there are situations in which individuals wish to delete information held in such databases; whereas, therefore, companies must be able to ensure that individuals can have person-related data deleted from databases;
ker tehnološki napredek vedno pogosteje omogoča tajno nadzorovanje dejavnosti državljanov na internetu, ki ga posameznik praktično ne more zaznati; ker zgolj obstoj tehnologije za nadzor ne opravičuje samodejno tudi njene uporabe, temveč bi bilo treba omejitve in natančne okoliščine, v katerih bi javni organi ali podjetja takšno tehnologijo smeli uporabiti, določiti na podlagi prevladujočega interesa varovanja temeljnih pravic državljanov; ker boj proti kriminalu na internetu in grožnje odprti demokratični družbi, ki jih predstavljajo nekatere osebe in organizacije, ko uporabljajo internet v škodo pravic državljanov, ne smejo pomeniti, da si države članice lahko vzamejo pravico do prestrezanja in nadzorovanja vsega podatkovnega prometa na internetu, ki poteka na njihovem ozemlju, bodisi da to velja za njihove državljane ali za podatkovni promet iz tujine; ker mora biti boj proti kaznivim dejanjem sorazmeren z naravo kaznivih dejanj,
whereas technological leaps increasingly allow for the secret surveillance, virtually undetectable to the individual, of citizens" activities on the Internet; whereas the mere existence of surveillance technologies does not automatically justify their uses, but whereas the overriding interest of protecting citizens" fundamental rights should determine the limits and precise circumstances under which such technologies may be used by public authorities or companies; whereas combating Internet crime and the threats to an open democratic society which certain persons and organisations constitute when they use the Internet to damage citizens' rights must not mean that Member States assume the right to intercept and monitor all data traffic on the Internet which occurs on their territory, whether that applies to their own citizens or data traffic from abroad; whereas the combating of crime must be proportionate to the nature of the crime;
ker kraja identitete in njeno lažno prikazovanje predstavljata vedno večji problem, ki ga oblasti, posamezni državljani in podjetja šele začenjajo spoznavati in ki povzroča velike varnostne pomisleke v zvezi s povečano uporabo interneta za širok spekter namenov, vključno s prodajo in izmenjavo zaupnih informacij,
whereas identity theft and fraud are an increasing problem that the authorities, individual citizens and companies are only beginning to recognise, leaving major security concerns in relation to the intensified use of the Internet for a wide range of purposes, including commerce and the exchange of confidential information,
ker bi bilo treba opozoriti, da lahko javni organi omejijo uveljavljanje pravic, kot sta svoboda izražanja ali spoštovanje zasebnega življenja, če so te omejitve v skladu z zakonom, nujne, sorazmerne in primerne za demokratično družbo,
whereas it should be recalled that, when dealing with rights such as freedom of expression or respect for private life, limitations to the exercise of such rights may be imposed by public authorities if they are in accordance with the law, necessary, proportionate, and appropriate in a democratic society,
ker na internetu obstaja velik razkorak v moči in znanju med gospodarskimi in vladnimi subjekti na eni strani ter posameznimi uporabniki na drugi strani; ker je zato treba sprožiti razpravo o potrebnih omejitvah glede "soglasja", in sicer glede tega, kakšna razkritja lahko podjetja in vlade zahtevajo od uporabnikov, in v kakšni meri naj bi bili posamezniki dolžni razkriti svojo zasebnost in se odpovedati drugim temeljnim pravicam, da bi lahko uporabljali določene internetne storitve ali druge ugodnosti,
whereas, on the Internet, there is a major power and knowledge divide between corporate and government entities on the one hand, and individual users on the other; whereas, therefore, a debate must be launched on necessary limitations to "consent," both in terms of what companies and governments may ask a user to disclose and to what extent individuals should be required to cede their privacy and other fundamental rights in order to receive certain Internet services or other privileges,
ker internet zaradi svoje globalne, odprte in participativne narave praviloma velja za svobodnega, kar pa ne pomeni, da ni treba razmisliti o načinu spoštovanja in zaščite temeljnih svoboščin internetnih uporabnikov in njihove varnosti, in sicer na državni in mednarodni ravni ter v javnem in zasebnem okviru,
whereas due to its global, open, and participatory nature, the Internet enjoys freedom as a rule, but this does not preclude the need to reflect (at national and international levels, as well as in public and in private settings) upon how the fundamental freedoms of Internet users as well as their security are respected and protected,