natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so državni organi ustavili vse registracije novih časopisov; ker vsak dan potekajo sojenja časopisom in novinarjem in ker so bile večini obstoječih časopisov naložene denarne kazni, kar jim onemogoča nadaljevanje objavljanja,
whereas all registration of new newspapers has been stopped by the state authorities, trials of newspapers and journalists take place every day and many existing newspapers have been burdened with fines which make it impossible for them to continue publishing,
ker je predsednik Lukašenko mednarodnemu omrežju NVO v Evropi in Belorusiji skoraj v celoti onemogočil, da otrokom, ki trpijo zaradi posledic černobilske tragedije, nudijo pomoč pri potovanju in konvalescenci v drugih državah,
whereas President Lukashenko has made it almost impossible for the international network of NGOs in Europe and Belarus to help children suffering from the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster to travel to various countries to convalesce,
ker je Poljska po vrsti izgonov diplomatov odpoklicala svojega ambasadorja iz Minska ter ovrgla obtožbe predsednika Lukašenka, da se Poljska vmešava v zadeve njegove države,
whereas Poland temporarily recalled its ambassador from Minsk after a series of expulsions of diplomats, rejecting President Lukashenko's accusations that Poland was meddling in his country's affairs,
ker je beloruski predsednik Lukašenko na vrhu Združenih narodov 15. septembra 2005 v New Yorku obtožil organe ZN za človekove pravice, da dopuščajo, da jih nekateri zlorabljajo za nadzor nad drugimi državami,
whereas at the United Nations Summit in New York on 15 September 2005 President Lukashenko accused UN human rights bodies of allowing themselves to be misused to control other countries,
ker pristopu Sveta do Belorusija manjka odločnosti in vztrajnosti,
whereas the Council approach towards Belarus has been lacking decisiveness and resolve,
močno obsoja brezobzirne napade beloruskega režima na medije, borce za manjšine in človekove pravice, člane opozicije, verske voditelje in vse ljudi, ki skušajo svobodno izraziti kritike na račun predsednika in režima; tako ravnanje se odraža v samovoljnih aretacijah, slabem ravnanju z zaporniki, izginotjih, preganjanju iz političnih razlogov in drugih dejanjih represije, ki so v posmeh osnovnim načelom demokracije in pravne države;
Strongly condemns the Belarus regime's indiscriminate attacks on the media, minority and human rights activists, members of the opposition, religious leaders, and any person who attempts freely to voice criticism of the President and the regime, as manifested through arbitrary arrests, ill-treatment of detainees, disappearances, politically motivated persecution and other acts of repression that flout the basic principles of democracy and the rule of law;
obsoja spremembo uredbe 460 v zvezi s predpisi za sprejemanje tuje pomoči, ki jo je beloruski režim sprejel 17. avgusta 2005 in ki podaljšuje seznam ciljev, za katere ni dovoljeno sprejeti zunanje pomoči; trenutno sta prepovedana sprejemanje in uporaba zunanje pomoči za "protiustavne namene", za strmoglavljenje oblasti, vmešavanje v notranje zadeve Belorusije, pripravo volitev ali referendumov, organizacijo srečanj, shodov, stavkovnih straž ali stavk ter pripravo in razširjanje propagandnih materialov; onemogočena je uporaba sredstev pomoči iz tujine za organiziranje konferenc, seminarjev in srečanj;
Condemns the Belarus regime's amendment to Decree 460 on the regulations for accepting foreign aid, dated 17 August 2005, which extends the list of objectives for which external aid cannot be accepted: notes that it is now forbidden to accept and use international aid for 'unconstitutional purposes', to overthrow authorities, interfere with the internal affairs of Belarus, prepare elections or referendums, organise meetings, rallies, pickets or strikes, or prepare and distribute propaganda materials, and it is impossible to organise conferences, seminars and meetings of any kind using aid funds from abroad;
obsoja odločitev režima z dne 22. avgusta, da prepove protestantsko cerkev, ki je prisotna v Belorusiji že več kot 400 let; protestantska cerkev. je bila prepovedana, ker skupnost ni imela pravnega naslova; tega pa tudi ne bi mogla prijaviti, saj so jo oblasti pred tem pregnale iz vseh molilnic, kar je v nasprotju z beloruskim zakonom o svobodi vere;
Condemns the regime's decision of 22 August to ban the Reformed Evangelical Church, which had been present in Belarus for more than 400 years and which was outlawed because the community had no legal address, nor could it have registered one, because the authorities had previously evicted it from all of its prayer houses, which violated Belarussian law on the freedom of belief;
obsoja vladno akcijo proti poljskemu združenju v Belorusiji kot kršitev temeljnih načel "Okvirne konvencije Sveta Evrope o varstvu narodnih manjšin" iz leta 1995 in kot poizkus omejiti največjo nevladno organizacijo in eno redkih, ki jih vlada ni nadzorovala; opozarja, da spoštovanje pravic manjšin zajema tudi svobodo združevanja in priznavanja izvoljenih zakonitih organov organizacije; obžaluje vladin poizkus prevzem nadzora nad časopisom "Glos znad Niemna";
Condemns the government's action against the Union of Poles in Belarus as a violation of the basic principles of the Council of Europe 'Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities' of 1995 and as an attempt to curb the largest non-governmental organisation and one of the few that were not controlled by the government; recalls that respect for minority rights also includes freedom of association and recognition of the elected statutory bodies of the organisation; deplores the government's assumption of control over the 'Glos znad Niemna' newspaper;
obsoja stalno preganjanje aktivistov poljske manjšine, ki želijo ohraniti neodvisnost svojega združenja; najbolj aktivne aktiviste nadlegujejo s ponovljenimi pozivi iz urada državnega tožilca in policije; v zadnjih tednih so vodjo združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji Angeliko Borys (ZBP) zaslišali več kot 50-krat; ustanovitelja in trenutnega podpredsednika ZPB Tadeusza Gawina so obsodili na 30-dnevno zaporno kazen;
Condemns the continuous persecution of activists belonging to the Polish minority who wish to preserve the independence of their association; observes that the most active are harassed by repeated summonses to the prosecutor's office and the police, that Angelika Borys, the leader of the Union of Poles in Belarus (ZPB), has been interrogated more than 50 times in recent weeks and that Tadeusz Gawin, a founder member and current vice-president of ZPB, has been sentenced to 30 days' imprisonment;
obsoja izrečene kazni do dveh let zapora za aktiviste ZPB Jozefa Parzeckiga, Wieslawa Kiewlaka, Andrzeja Pisalnika in Andrzeja Poczobuta zaradi neresničnih kazenskih obtožb ;
Condemns the sentencing of ZPB activists Jozef Parzecki, Wieslaw Kiewlak, Andrzej Pisalnik and Andrzej Poczobut to up to two years' imprisonment on false criminal charges;
obsoja popolno zapostavljenost romske manjšine, ki ji je beloruski režim omejil državljanske pravice ter najostreje obsoja sovražni govor v uradnih medijih, ki je naravnan proti Romski populaciji;
Condemns the Belarus regime's complete marginalisation of the Roma minority in Belarus, whose basic civic rights have been curtailed, and strongly condemns hate speech against the Roma population in the official media;
obsoja beloruske oblasti, ker niso odobrile vstopnih viz delegaciji članov evropskega parlamenta, ki so se 8. avgusta 2005 napotili na misijo za raziskavo dejstev;
Condemns the Belarus authorities for not granting entry visas to a delegation of Members of the European Parliament who went on a fact-finding mission on 8 August 2005;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da pripravita program štipendiranja, obiskovanja in prakse za aktiviste NVO, borce za človekove pravice in pravice manjšin;
Calls on the Council and Commission to create a programme of scholarships, visits and placements for NGOs and human rights and minority activists;
meni, če beloruske oblasti ne bodo izboljšale položaja glede svobode govora, združevanja in verske svobode, ali če se bo položaj še poslabšal, da morajo Komisija, Svet in Parlament sprožiti postopek širjenja seznama prepovedi izdaje vizumov na beloruske oblasti, ki sodelujejo pri preganjanju; sankcije proti Lukašenkovemu režimu naj tudi vključujejo zamrznitev kapitala beloruskih oblasti v tujini;
Should the Belarussian authorities fail to improve the situation regarding freedom of speech, assembly and religion, thus permitting its further deterioration, the Commission, the Council and Parliament should initiate the procedure to expand the visa-ban list to include representatives of Belarussian authorities involved in persecution; considers that the sanctions against President Lukashenko's regime should also include the freezing of assets of Belarussian authorities abroad;
ponovno poudarja, da bo nadaljnji razvoj odnosov EU z Belorusijo še naprej odvisen od napredka v smeri demokratizacije in reform v državi; in dostopnosti Belorusov do objektivnih, svobodnih in preglednih medijev ter spoštovanja manjšinskih in verskih pravic in svoboščin ;
Emphasises once again that the further development of EU relations with Belarus will also continue to depend on the progress made towards democratisation and reform in the country and access for Belarussians to objective, free and transparent media, as well as respect for minority and religious rights and freedoms;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija namenila še več pomoči neodvisni radiodifuziji v Belorusiji; poudarja potrebo po zagotavljanju visoko kakovostnih in neodvisnih informacij beloruskemu ljudstvu; poziva Svet in Komisijo, da čimprej dodelita še več pomoči svobodnim medijem in neodvisnim NVO v Bolorusiji in da še razširi pobude kar zadeva radiodifuzijo;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has launched further support for independent broadcasting in Belarus; stresses the importance of offering high quality and independent information to the Belarus public; calls on the Council and Commission to grant as soon as possible even greater assistance to the free media and independent NGOs in Belarus and to extend broadcasting initiatives;
poziva Komisijo, naj prepreči, da bi "izmišljene NVO", ki jih beloruske oblasti ustanavljajo z namenom privabljanja sredstev tujih donatorjev, pridobile sredstva iz skladov EU ali iz proračuna EU;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that no 'pseudo-NGOs', which are created by the Belarus authorities in order to obtain funds from foreign donors, receive any EU funding or any contributions from EU budget;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da podpreta demokratično iz voljeno poljsko združenje v Belorusiji ter upravne odbore drugih demokratično izvoljenih nevladnih organizacij, ki so prav tako žrtve zatiranja Lukašenkovega režima;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to support the democratically elected board of the Union of Poles in Belarus, as well as the boards of other democratically elected non-governmental organisations which are also subject to repression by the Lukashenko regime;
poziva k ustanovitvi ad hoc delegacij na visoki ravni, ki bi jih poslali na misijo za raziskavo dejstev v Belorusijo in ki bi o svojih ugotovitvah poročale Parlamentu;
Calls for the creation of an ad-hoc high level delegation to be sent on a fact-finding mission to Belarus and to report its findings to Parliament;
odločno podpira naznanitev predsednika Komisije, da bo v Belorusiji namestila posebnega diplomata, katerega naloga po spremljanje položaja človekovih pravic in poziva Komisijo, da pospeši odprtje stalnega predstavništva Evropske unije v Minsku, kar bo omogočalo lažje širjenje informacij, koordiniranje projektov in spremljanje situacije v Belorusiji;
Strongly supports the announcement by the President of the Commission of the posting of a special diplomat to Belarus to monitor the human rights situation and calls on the Commission to accelerate the opening of a permanent representation of the European Union in Minsk, so as to be able to better distribute information, coordinate projects and monitor the situation in Belarus;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da sprožita vprašanje o Belorusiji z ruskimi oblastmi za določitev skupne akcije, ki bo omogočila konkretne demokratične spremembe v tej državi;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to raise the issue of Belarus with the Russian authorities so as to define a common responsibility for bringing about concrete democratic changes in that country;
poziva vse države članice EU, da začnejo s postopki izdajanja brezplačnih viz za beloruske državljane;
Appeals to all EU Member States to introduce free visas for Belarussian citizens;
poziva evropske politične stranke in politične skupine v Evropskem parlamentu, da povečajo svoje stike in politično podporo beloruski opoziciji;
Calls on European political parties and the political groups in the European Parliament to increase their contacts with and political support for the Belarussian opposition;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu, parlamentom in vladam držav članic, parlamentarni skupščini OVSE ter Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Parliaments and Governments of the Member States and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
– María Esther Herranz García, Christa Klaß, Astrid Lulling in Giuseppe Castiglione, v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– María Esther Herranz García, Christa Klaß, Astrid Lulling and Giuseppe Castiglione, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– María Isabel Salinas García, Vincenzo Lavarra in Katerina Batzeli, v imenu skupine PSE
– María Isabel Salinas García, Vincenzo Lavarra and Katerina Batzeli, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Anne Laperrouze, Niels Busk, Willem Schuth, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis in Ignasi Guardans Cambó, v imenu skupine ALDE
– Anne Laperrouze, Niels Busk, Willem Schuth, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis and Ignasi Guardans Cambó, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Marie-Hélène Aubert in Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
– Marie-Hélène Aubert and Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
– Ilda Figueiredo in Marco Rizzo, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
– Ilda Figueiredo and Marco Rizzo, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
– Sergio Berlato, Roberta Angelilli in Sebastiano (Nello) Musumeci, v imenu skupine UEN
– Sergio Berlato, Roberta Angelilli and Sebastiano (Nello) Musumeci, on behalf of the UEN Group
o sporazumu o vinogradništvu med EU in ZDA
on the EU-US wine agreement
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu o vinogradništvu med EU in ZDA
European Parliament resolution on the EU-US wine agreement
ob upoštevanju dvostranskega sporazuma o vinogradništvu, ki sta ga Evropska unija in Združene države Amerike podpisali 14. septembra 2005,
having regard to the bilateral agreement initialled by the European Union and the United States on 14 September 2005 on trade in wine,
ob upoštevanju kmetijskega dela pogajanj, ki potekajo s Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo,
having regard to the agricultural chapter of the ongoing negotiations in the World Trade Organisation,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 1493/1999 z dne 17. maja 1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino;
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine,
ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma med Evropsko komisijo in Evropskim parlamentom, po katerem je Komisija pri mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih dolžna Parlament pravočasno in jasno obveščati tako o pripravah sporazumov kot o poteku in zaključku mednarodnih pogajanj, kar velja za osnutke pogajalskih smernic, sprejete pogajalske direktive, izvedbo pogajanj in njihov zaključek,
having regard to the Framework Agreement between the Commission and Parliament stipulating that, in connection with international trade agreements, the Commission shall provide early and clear information to Parliament both during the phase of preparation of the agreements and during the conduct and conclusion of international negotiations, including draft negotiating directives, the adopted negotiating directives, the subsequent conduct of negotiations and the conclusion of the negotiations,
ker so politični in gospodarski odnosi temeljni kamen odnosov med EU in ZDA, njihov obseg pa se neprestano veča,
whereas political and economic relations are the bedrock of EU-US relations, the scope of which is constantly widening,
ker je vsebina tega prvega sporazuma med EU in Združenimi državami Amerike, sprejetega po dvajsetih letih neuspešnih pogajanj, precej skromna in vprašanja v zvezi z dvostransko trgovino z vinom, ki bodo predmet druge faze sporazumov, obravnava nezadovoljivo,
whereas this first agreement between the EU and the United States, which has been concluded after two decades of fruitless negotiations, has only minimal scope and does not deal satisfactorily with all the issues relevant to the bilateral trade in wine, which will be the subject of a second round of agreements,
ker dvostranski sporazum še čaka na postopek ratifikacije, zlasti v ameriškem kongresu,
whereas the bilateral agreement still has to be ratified, inter alia by the United States Congress,
ker moramo upoštevati negativne posledice, ki jih lahko ima neomejeno vzajemno priznavanje enoloških postopkov za evropske pridelovalce vina,
having regard to the negative consequences of the unrestricted mutual recognition of oenological procedures for the European wine industry,
ker si tretje države nezakonito prilaščajo geografske označbe iz EU, kar predstavlja kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in povzroča gospodarsko škodo zakonitim imetnikom geografskih označb, saj slednji izgubljajo tržišča,
whereas the wrongful use of EU geographical indications of origin by third countries violates intellectual property rights and causes economic harm to the legitimate holders of the designations on account of loss of market share,
ker je pravni okvir geografskih označb pomemben element politike EU, saj priznava pomen večfunkcionalnega kmetijstva in socialni in okoljski vpliv pridelave vina v hribovitih predelih in slabše razvitih območjih,
whereas the legal framework of geographical indications is an important element in EU policies, recognising as it does the importance of multifunctional agriculture and the social and environmental impact of wine production in mountainous areas and disadvantaged regions,
ker se zelo pogosto dogaja, da lažne označbe porekla povzročajo hudo konkurenco pravim; ker ZDA ne upoštevajo vin z zaščiteno označbo porekla in jih na domačem trgu obravnavajo le nekaj bolje kot generične izdelke,
whereas false designations often provide stiff competition for genuine designations; whereas the United States does not respect the protection of wines with a designation of origin, and regards them merely as semi-generic products on its domestic markets,
ker vinski sektor v Evropi predstavlja pomemben vir delovnih mest in dohodka za male družinske kmetije in mala vinska podjetja; ker temelji na teritorialnem pristopu evropske politike s področja vinogradništva,
whereas the wine sector in Europe offers a major source of employment and income from small family farms and small wine enterprises, based on the territorial approach of European wine policies,
ker pristop, ki je predhodno veljal pri dvostranskih sporazumih, ni več aktualen, kot tudi ni več aktualna zamisel mednarodnega urada za vino in vinsko trto (O.I.V.) o vzpostavitvi mednarodnih meril za pridelavo vina,
having regard to the deviation from the previous line for bilateral agreements and from the idea of an international standard for wine and manufacturing put forward by the International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV),
ker je večina vin, ki se ponašajo z označbo porekla, plod tradicionalnih načinov pridelave, ki so dragi in sledijo predpisom o kakovosti ter jih je nemogoče primerjati z industrijsko pridelavo, uporabljeno pri ameriških vinih, ki se pojavljajo ob boku vin, označenih z evropskimi označbami porekla,
whereas most of the wines which have a designation of origin are produced using costly traditional processes and adhering to strict standards of quality, and whereas these processes cannot be compared to the industrial processes used in making American wines, which exist alongside the wines bearing European designations of origin,
ker bi ta sporazum predstavljal precedenčen primer glede obravnave po načelu največjih ugodnosti STO,
whereas this agreement would set a precedent in terms of the WTO most-favoured-nation clause,
ker moramo upoštevati neugoden položaj, v katerem so se posebna vina znašla na evropskem vinskem trgu zaradi opredelitve pojma "vino";
having regard to the disadvantages caused by the definition of the term ‘wine’ on the European wine market for special wines,
ugotavlja, da je dvostranski sporazum, dosežen po 20 letih pogajanj, potreben, če prispeva k dodatni varnosti izvoza v ZDA - na najpomembnejše tržišče za evropske vinogradnike, če vzpostavlja ozračje zaupanja in zagotavlja nemoteno trgovinsko izmenjavo;
Notes that this bilateral agreement, reached after 20 years of negotiation, is necessary if it helps to ensure exports to the United States, which constitutes the principal market for EU wine makers, to restore a climate of trust and to ensure the smooth flow of trade;
se zaveda potrebe po dvostranskem sporazumu o vinogradništvu med EU in ZDA in izraža upanje, da bo druga faza pogajanj prinesla zadovoljive rezultate za tradicionalno pridelavo, družinsko vinogradništvo in kakovost naših vin; poudarja, da sporazum, četudi nezadosten in ne povsem ustrezen, vseeno predstavlja prvi korak na poti priznavanja tradicionalnih zaščitenih oznak Evropske unije na mednarodni ravni;
Agrees with the need for a bilateral agreement between the EU and the United States on trade in wine, and hopes that the next phase of the negotiations will result in a satisfactory outcome for traditional production methods, family-based wine making and the quality of our wines; emphasises that the agreement constitutes merely an initial, insufficient and inadequate step towards international recognition of the EU's protected traditional names;
kritizira delovanje Komisije, ki je dvostranski dogovor z ZDA sklenila, ne da bi o tem pravočasno obvestila Parlament, ki zaradi tega ni mogel izraziti svojega stališča in Komisija ni mogla upoštevati njegove mnenja, kot sicer določa člen 19 okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskih parlamentom in Komisijo (2005/2076(ACI));
Criticises the Commission for having agreed to a bilateral deal with the US without informing Parliament in sufficient time for it to be able to express its point of view and for the Commission to be able to take Parliament’s views into account, as laid down in Article 19 of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission (2005/2076(ACI);
opozarja na posledice, ki bi jih novi sporazum lahko imel na politiko Evropske unije na področju trgovine z vinom in posledično na tradicionalne načine pridelave, na katere stavi politika Skupnosti za priznavanje kakovosti;
Draws attention to the repercussions that the new agreement could have for EU wine trade policy and its possible consequences for traditional models of production, which form the basis of the recognition of Community quality policy;
obžaluje dejstvo, da bo sporazum bistveno oslabil položaj EU v pogajanjih o kmetijstvu v okviru STO, saj izpodkopava teritorialni in v kakovost usmerjeni pristop, ki se izvaja v precejšnjem delu vinogradniškega sektorja;
Deplores the fact that this agreement will substantially weaken the EU’s position in the negotiations on agriculture within the WTO, as it undermines the territorial and quality‑oriented approach which is practised in a large part of the wine sector;