natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi vpliva velikih trgovinskih verig na splošno kakovost živilskih proizvodov v EU, pa tudi zaradi dejstva, da se na trgih, za katere je značilna močno koncentrirana distribucija, pojavlja težnja po poenotenju in zmanjšanju raznolikosti agroživilskih proizvodov, zaradi česar je na policah manj tradicionalnih in več predhodno obdelanih proizvodov; predlaga Komisiji, naj določi predpise za postopek nabavne dražbe, ki so ga uveljavile nekatere velike evropske nakupovalne centrale, saj ima uničujoče posledice za kakovostne proizvode;
Is concerned at the influence of the big retail chains on the general quality level of EU food products, as well as at the trend on those markets characterised by a high levels of concentration of distribution towards standardisation and reduction of variety of agricultural and food products, in the wake of the declining presence of traditional products and a greater stress on processed products; suggests that the Commission take note of the need to regulate the reverse tendering practices imposed by a small number of bulk buyers, in view of their disastrous consequences for quality products;
Zahteve proizvodnje in tržni standardi
Requirements concerning production and marketing standards
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi zapletenosti sistema EU glede osnovnih standardov in številnih predpisov, ki jih morajo upoštevati kmetje v EU; si prizadeva za poenostavitev in zagovarja pristop, po katerem mora biti vsak nov predpis preverljiv po merilih primernosti, potrebnosti in sorazmernosti;
Is concerned at the complexity of the EU system of basic standards and at the multiplicity of rules which farmers in the European Union have to comply with; favours a simplified system and calls for each new rule to be assessed in accordance with the criteria of suitability, necessity and proportionality;
poziva k dodatni poenostavitvi tržnih standardov z razjasnitvijo osnovnih meril, ki jih je treba uporabljati; poziva k oblikovanju smernic EU o uporabi splošnih rezerviranih navedb, kot so "nizka vsebnost sladkorja", "nizkoogljičen", "dietičen" ali "naraven", za preprečevanje zavajajočih praks;
Calls for further simplification of marketing standards by clarifying the main criteria to be applied; calls for the development of EU guidelines on the use of general reserved terms, such as "low in sugar", "low carbon", "dietary" and "natural", in order to avoid misleading practices;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nezadostne obveščenosti večine evropskih potrošnikov o prehranjevalni verigi, zlasti kar zadeva poreklo proizvodov in surovin; je naklonjen uvedbi obvezne navedbe kraja proizvodnje primarnih proizvodov v obliki označbe države porekla, da bi tako ustregli želji potrošnikov po več informacijah o poreklu proizvoda, ki ga kupijo; meni, da bi bilo treba ta sistem uporabljati tudi za predelane živilske proizvode in za zagotovitev podatkov o poreklu glavnih sestavin in surovin ter navesti njihov kraj porekla in kraj, kjer je bil proizvod nazadnje predelan;
Is concerned at the fact that the majority of EU consumers are not sufficiently well-informed concerning the food chain, especially as regards products' and raw materials' origins; advocates mandatory indication of place of production of primary products based on a country of origin label, reflecting consumer desire to know more about the origins of the product they are buying; believes such a system should also apply to processed food products and should provide information on the origins of the main ingredients and raw materials, specifying their place of origin as well as the place of final processing;
meni, da je avstralski model sistema za označevanje države porekla odličen primer, če se istočasno upoštevajo posebne danosti različnih proizvodnih sektorjev v EU, saj označuje različne stopnje, na primer: "proizvedeno v/na" za živila, izdelana v zadevni državi iz sestavin s poreklom iz zadevne države, ali "izdelano v/na" za živila, ki so bila v zadevni državi bistveno predelana, ali "izdelano v/na ... na osnovi lokalnih ali uvoženih sestavin"; opozarja, da tudi druge pomembne trgovinske partnerice Evropske unije, kot so Združene države ali Nova Zelandija, uporabljajo podobne sisteme označevanja;
Considers the Australian model to be an excellent example for such a system of labelling of the country of origin, while bearing in mind the specific characteristics of the European Union's various production sectors, in its defining of various different levels such as "produced in" (for food products produced locally with local ingredients), "made in" (for food products which have undergone substantial processing locally), or "made in country X using local or imported ingredients"; recalls that similar labelling systems are used by other major trading partners such as the US and New Zealand;
meni, da tržni standardi ne smejo ovirati dostopa proizvodov na trg na podlagi njihovega videza, oblike ali velikosti, če ti proizvodi izpolnjujejo standarde varnosti hrane;
Considers that, provided food safety requirements are complied with, marketing standards should not have the effect of blocking market access for products on grounds of their appearance, shape or size;
meni, da mora skupna oznaka kakovosti EU z besedilom "proizvedeno v Evropski uniji" na koncu zagotoviti, da zahvaljujoč zahtevnim standardom, v skladu s katerimi so proizvedeni, proizvodi EU na trgu pozitivno odstopajo;
Takes the view that the use of the general EU quality label, bearing the words "produced in the European Union", must ultimately ensure that EU products stand out on the market, on the basis of the high quality standards governing their production;
meni, da je treba spodbujati predvsem neobvezne rezervirane navedbe in ne toliko obveznih tržnih standardov; vendar meni, da je lahko uvedba takšnih usklajenih opredelitev, ki naj bi zadovoljile vse udeležence, zaradi različnih prehranjevalnih navad in tradicij povezana s težavami, poleg tega pa lahko povzroči povečanje količine informacij, s katerimi se sooča potrošnik, kot tudi potrebo po vzpostavitvi nadzornega sistema za preverjanje uporabe teh navedb;
Considers that the optional reserved terms should be promoted as an alternative to compulsory marketing standards; considers, however, that the introduction of these uniform definitions satisfying all interested parties may encounter difficulties, bearing in mind the differences in dietary habits and traditions, with an increase in the amount of consumer information provided and the need to develop a system to monitor the use of these terms;
je naklonjen ukrepom za poenostavitev predpisov Skupnosti, če ti ne vodijo v razvodenitev teh predpisov, in omejitev področij, ki so prepuščena samoregulaciji; meni, da je treba oblikovati skupne tržne standarde, ki se lahko učinkoviteje določijo; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba spodbujati koregulacijo v okviru običajnega postopka za sprejetje zakonodaje Skupnosti na tem področju; poziva, naj bodo v ta postopek vključeni nacionalni organi, predstavniki živilskega sektorja in kmetje;
Advocates taking measures to simplify the EU rules, without this resulting in their dismantling, and to limit the scope for self-regulation; believes that common marketing standards are necessary and can be established in a more efficient manner; considers, in this connection, that joint regulation should be promoted as the usual means of adopting Community legislation in the field; calls for municipal authorities, food industry representatives and farmers' representatives to be involved in the process;
Posebni sistemi kakovosti v Evropski uniji
Specific quality systems in the European Union
poudarja, da morajo sistemi kakovosti hrane potrošnikom ponujati informacije in jamstvo o pristnosti lokalnih sestavin in proizvodnih postopkov; zato meni, da se morajo takšni sistemi izvajati in upravljati z okrepljenim nadzorom in sistemi sledljivosti;
Underlines that food quality systems should provide information and offer a guarantee for consumers of the authenticity of local ingredients and production techniques; considers, therefore, that such schemes must be implemented and operated with reinforced controls and traceability systems;
meni, da je treba uvesti preglednejše sisteme označevanja, ki jih bo prepoznala večina potrošnikov, ter da je za pregledno označevanje porekla treba tako pri proizvodih iz EU kot tudi pri proizvodih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav, navesti poreklo bistvenih kmetijskih sestavin, ki opredeljujejo proizvod;
Believes that there needs to be a more transparent labelling system enjoying broad consumer recognition, and that, in the interests of transparent labelling of origin, the provenance of essential product-defining agricultural ingredients should be shown both on EU products and on those imported from third countries;
meni, da je treba zagotoviti, da se kot surovine uporabljajo izključno originalni proizvodi z ZOP, zgolj če se pri označevanju in reklamiranju predelanega proizvoda uporablja zaščiteno ime; poudarja, da se na ta način po eni strani preprečuje zavajanje potrošnikov, po drugi strani pa spodbuja povpraševanje po proizvodih z ZOP;
Considers that the need to ensure the exclusive use of authentic PDO products as raw materials applies only where protected nomenclature is used for labelling and advertising a processed product; points out that this prevents consumers from being misled on the one hand, and stimulates demand for PDO products on the other;
meni, da je smotrno določiti pravila za uporabo navedb "gorski" in "otoški", saj bi to dalo veliko dodatno prednost kmetijskim proizvodom in živilom iz teh območij z omejenimi možnostmi; meni, da je treba pri uporabi navedb "gorski" in "otoški" obvezno dodati državo porekla proizvoda;
Advocates the adoption of rules concerning the use of the terms 'mountain' and 'island' given the significant resulting added value for agricultural products and foodstuffs from these less-favoured areas; believes that use of the terms 'mountain' and 'island' must be accompanied by compulsory indication of the country of origin of the product;
v zvezi s tem opozarja, da povprečen potrošnik ne pozna dobro razlike med ZOP in ZGO in da je treba potrošnike na to razliko opozoriti z obveščevalno kampanjo;
Points out in this connection that, for the average consumer, the difference between PDO and PGI is not clear, and that an information campaign is needed to make consumers aware of that difference;
nasprotuje določitvi strožjih meril za ocenjevanje, ki bi temeljila na primer na izvoznih možnostih in trajnosti; opozarja, da obstajajo številni primeri proizvodov, ki se sicer ne izvažajo, vendar so vseeno zelo pomembni za oblikovanje lokalnih gospodarstev ter za ohranjanje socialne kohezije;
Opposes the adoption of stricter assessment criteria, such as exportability and sustainability; points out that there are a number of examples of products which, while not exportable, are of major importance in shaping the local economy and ensuring continued social cohesion;
poudarja, da so označbe porekla del pomembne evropske dediščine, ki jo je treba ohraniti, zaradi njene znatne gospodarske moči in njenih temeljnih družbenoekonomskih učinkov za številne regije EU; meni, da so te označbe jamstvo za kakovost, ki ga je treba okrepiti, zlasti s strožjim nadzorom upravljanja označb porekla v združenjih, ki so zanje zaprosila; meni, da te označbe potrošnikom pomagajo izbirati med proizvodi;
Stresses that designations of origin constitute a crucial part of the European heritage which needs to be preserved because of its crucial economic power and because it has a key socio-economic impact on many EU regions; believes that they offer a guarantee of quality, which must be reinforced, particularly by stricter control over the management of designations of origin by the applicant groups representing them; considers that they help consumers in making their choice from the range of goods on offer;
meni, da je treba bolje razjasniti razlike med blagovnimi znamkami in označbami porekla ter sprejeti ukrepe za dejansko uporabo veljavnih predpisov Skupnosti, ki preprečujejo registracijo blagovne znamke, ki bi vsebovala ZOP/ZGO ali bi se nanjo sklicevala, gospodarskim subjektom, ki ne zastopajo organizacij proizvajalcev teh ZOP/ZGO; meni, da je nujno treba izvesti promocijske kampanje z lastnim proračunom za informiranje potrošnikov o prednostih teh javnih shem za potrjevanje;
Considers that there is a need to better explain the differences between trademarks and designation of origin and to take measures to enable the existing Community rules preventing registration of a trademark containing or referring to PDOs/PGIs by operators who do not represent the producer organisations of those PDOs/PGIs to be applied in practice; considers it vitally important to launch promotional campaigns, with their own budgets, to inform consumers on the benefits of those public sector certification systems;
meni, da bi morali imeti proizvajalci proizvodov z geografskimi označbami na voljo instrumente, ki bi jim omogočali primerno upravljanje proizvedene količine blaga, da bi se ohranila kakovost in ugled geografskih označb;
Believes that, in the interests of preserving quality and maintaining the reputation of the geographical indications, producers of products bearing geographical indications should have instruments at their disposal to enable them to manage the volumes produced in a proper manner;
meni, da morajo imeti zaščitni ali drugi pristojni organi v primeru uporabe proizvoda z ZGO v sestavljenem kuhanem proizvodu – ob spremembi lastnosti proizvoda z ZGO – možnost, da izvajajo usmerjene kontrole za preverjanje, ali se lastnosti proizvoda z ZGO niso preveč spremenile;
Considers that, where a product with a PGI is used in a compound cooked product and the characteristics of the PGI product are altered, the protecting bodies or competent authorities must be allowed to conduct specific checks aimed at ascertaining whether or not the characteristics of the PGI product have been altered excessively;
poziva k boljši zaščiti registriranih označb, zlasti v nekaterih fazah embaliranja in trženja teh proizvodov izven območja proizvodnje ter kadar obstaja nevarnost neprimerne uporabe teh označb; poziva k uporabi predpisov Skupnosti, ki prepovedujejo registracijo označbe z imenom, podobnim imenu že registrirane ZOP ali ZGO;
Advocates greater protection for registered nomenclature, in particular at certain stages of packaging and marketing outside the production area wherever there is a danger of such nomenclature being improperly used; calls for the Community rules prohibiting the registration of marks with a designation similar to that of a PDO or PGI that has already been registered to be enforced;
zagovarja oblikovanje skupnih predpisov za proizvajalce proizvodov z geografskimi označbami, ki bodo določali pogoje za njihovo uporabo, tudi pri označevanju predelanih proizvodov;
Advocates the introduction of common rules to enable producers of products bearing geographical indications to determine the conditions for applying those indications, also in relation to their use in the designation of processed products;
je naklonjen poenostavitvi postopka registracije označb porekla in skrajšanju časa, potrebnega za pridobitev teh označb;
Favours simplifying the procedure for registering designations of origin and reducing the time required for obtaining them;
meni, da bi bilo treba okrepiti mednarodno zaščito označb porekla; poziva Komisijo, naj zlasti na politični ravni okrepi svoja prizadevanja za izboljšanje zaščite ZGO v pogajanjih v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (bodisi za razširitev zaščite v skladu s členom 23 Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine na vse proizvode bodisi za vzpostavitev večstranskega registra ZGO), pa tudi v okviru pogajanj o sprejetju novih držav v STO ter tekočih pogajanj o dvostranskih sporazumih;
Believes that the international protection of designations of origin should be strengthened; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts, particularly at political level, to bring about an improvement in PGI protection in the course of the WTO talks (either by extending the protection under Article 23 of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights to all products, or by establishing a multilateral register of PGIs), and also in the accession negotiations for new member countries joining the WTO and bilateral agreements currently being negotiated;
meni, da mora ta mednarodna zaščita s strani EU veljati za proizvode, ki se izvažajo, in za tiste, ki se ne, se pa lahko razlikuje glede na dejansko nevarnost ponarejanja proizvodov znotraj EU, tako da so proizvodi, za katere je nevarnost ponarejanja večja in ki se izvažajo, pod mednarodno zaščito znotraj STO, medtem ko bi se za proizvode z manjšo nevarnostjo ponarejanja na bolj lokalnih tržiščih lahko uporabljal enostavnejši postopek, ki bil po priznanju s strani države članice sporočen Komisiji (primerljiv s sedanjo začasno zaščito) in užival pravno varstvo Skupnosti;
Takes the view that both exporting and non-exporting producers should be covered by that international protection on the part of the EU, which might differ on the basis of the risk of the actual counterfeiting of products, in such a way that products at high risk of counterfeiting, and which are exported, enjoy international protection at the WTO, while for products running a more moderate risk of counterfeiting, on markets at local level, a simplified procedure could be proposed, which, once recognised by the Member States, shall be notified to the Commission (comparable to the level of the current temporary protection) and enjoy Community legal protection;
opozarja, da tretje države na svojem območju sistematično neupravičeno uporabljajo nekatere označbe, s čimer zavajajo potrošnike in ogrožajo ugled originalnih proizvodov; poudarja, da je zaščita označbe v tretji državi izjemno dolgotrajen postopek, ki ga posamezne organizacije proizvajalcev le težko izvedejo, saj ima vsaka država posebne sisteme in postopke zaščite; poziva Komisijo, naj deluje posvetovalno ter organizacijam proizvajalcev pri sklepanju dogovorov s tretjimi državami zagotovi znanje in izkušnje, pa tudi pravno podporo;
Points out that certain nomenclatures are being systematically usurped on the territory of third countries, thereby misleading consumers and undermining the reputation of authentic products; points out that measures to ensure the protection of a nomenclature in a third country is a particularly time-consuming process which cannot easily be achieved by isolated producer groups given that specific protection arrangements and procedures exist in each country; urges the Commission to play an advisory role, providing producer groups with know-how and legal support regarding the conclusion of agreements with third countries;
meni, da mora biti uporaba zaščitenih označb porekla in zaščitenih geografskih označb pod nadzorom Skupnosti in nacionalnim nadzorom, in zagovarja stroge kazni za odvračanje od nezakonite uporabe teh instrumentov, tako da bi jih bile države članice v primerih ponarejanja ali imitacije zaščitenih označb dolžne izvajati; predlaga, da se ustrezna določba vključi v člen 13 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb porekla za kmetijske proizvode in živila UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
Takes the view that Community and national checks are essential with regard to protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications, and advocates severe penalties to deter unauthorised use of those instruments, in such a way that Member States are required to apply these automatically in the event of counterfeiting or imitation of protected designations; suggests bringing forward a specific clause in Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p.
; je naklonjen poenostavljenemu pridobivanju ZOP in uvedbi strogega nadzora, za kar morajo poskrbeti organi posamezne države članice, da bi zagotovili izvedbo vseh stopenj v postopku proizvodnje v zadevni geografski regiji;
in that respect; favours simplifying the procedures for obtaining PDOs, as well as stringent checks by Member State authorities when certifying that all stages of the production process have taken placed in the geographical area concerned;
meni, da nadzor trga glede izvajanja vseh določb o ZOP in ZGO sicer predstavlja večje upravno breme za države članice, vendar bo znatno prispevalo k učinkovitejši zaščiti; je naklonjen zagotavljanju tehnične pomoči Skupnosti pri izvajanju nadzora s strani držav članic, da bi tako zagotovili čim bolj enotno uveljavitev zaščite ZOP in ZGO v EU;
Considers that market monitoring for the enforcement of all PDO and PGI provisions will increase administrative costs for the Member States but will greatly contribute to more effective protection; favours Community technical assistance for monitoring by the Member States so as to ensure that PDO and PGI protection arrangements are implemented as uniformly as possible on the territory of the EU;
meni, da je treba z evropsko finančno pomočjo okrepiti dejavnosti obveščanja in populariziranja teh sistemov na notranjem trgu pa tudi v tretjih državah; meni tudi, da je treba za programe Skupnosti za obveščanje o proizvodih v EU in pospeševanje njihove prodaje povečati del sofinanciranja EU; upa, da se bo Komisija še naprej zavzemala za spodbujanje zamisli ZGO v tretjih državah, zlasti z večjo tehnično podporo v povezavi z organizacijami proizvajalcev ZGO;
Advocates further action to disseminate information on these systems and popularise them, with Community financial support, both within the internal market and in third countries; believes that the Community cofinancing rate for EU information and promotion programmes on quality EU products needs to be increased; hopes that the Commission will continue to promote the concept of PGI with non-member States, particularly by undertaking more technical assistance missions in conjunction with PGI producer groups;
priporoča vzpostavitev evropske agencije za kakovost proizvodov, ki bi tesno sodelovala z Evropsko agencijo za varnost hrane in s službami Komisije, pristojnimi za zaščito kakovosti živil; ta agencija bi odločala tudi o vse številnejših prijavah tretjih držav za priznanje ZOP, ZGO ter zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti (ZTP);
Suggests setting up a European Agency for Product Quality, which would work closely with the European Food Safety Authority and the Commission's units responsible for food quality, and which would also adjudicate on the increasing number of requests from third countries in relation to PDO, PGI and traditional speciality guaranteed products;
poudarja pomen Uredbe (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. septembra 2003 o gensko spremenjenih živilih in krmi UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str.
Stresses the importance for consumer choice of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on genetically modified food and feed OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p.
za svobodno izbiro potrošnikov; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži zakonodajni predlog tudi za obvezno označevanje živalskih proizvodov, kot so mleko, meso in jajca, če so živali za njihovo proizvodnjo hranjene z gensko spremenjeno krmo;
; calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal whereby a labelling requirement would also be introduced for animal products such as milk, meat and eggs produced by feeding animals with genetically modified feed;