natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
26. pozdravlja, da je Evropski svet poudaril bistveno vlogo skupne kmetijske politike in kohezijske politike v podporo strategiji EU 2020; poziva k močni povezavi med strategijo EU 2020 in kohezijsko politiko, ob upoštevanju morebitnega velikega vpliva kohezijske politike na doseganje dolgoročnih ciljev strategije EU 2020 in na trajnostno in socialno odpravljanje posledic finančne krize; poudarja, da mora biti kohezijska politika bistven element strategije EU 2020 ter da mora biti politika za vse evropske regije, s čimer se dodatno okrepi resnično evropski vpliv strategije; vztraja, da so osnovna načela kohezijske politike – celovit pristop, upravljanje na več ravneh in resnično partnerstvo – bistvenega pomena pri doseganju ciljev strategije EU 2020 in bi jih bilo zato treba v celoti vključiti vanjo; poudarja, da mora biti tudi ozemeljska kohezija sestavni del strategije EU 2020, v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Welcomes that the European Council stressed the key role of the common agricultural policy and cohesion policy to support the EU 2020 strategy; calls for a strong linkage between the EU 2020 strategy and cohesion policy, taking into account the huge potential impact of cohesion policy on achieving the long-term aims of the EU 2020 strategy and on tackling the effects of the financial crisis in a sustainable and social way; emphasises that cohesion policy must be a key element of the EU 2020 strategy and must be a policy for all European regions, thus further reinforcing the truly European impact of the strategy; insists that the basic principles of cohesion policy – an integrated approach, multi-level-governance and true partnership – play a key role in achieving the goals of the EU 2020 strategy and should thus be completely integrated in it; stresses that territorial cohesion must also be, in line with the Lisbon Treaty, an integrated part of the EU 2020 strategy;
28. poudarja, da je ribištvo (tako ribolov v naravi kot ribogojstvo) eden od najpomembnejših stebrov zanesljiv oskrbe s hrano Evropske unije in da je treba zato zagotoviti njegovo trajnost in stabilnost, da bo lahko v prihodnosti z ribiškimi proizvodi v kakovostnem in količinskem smislu prispevalo za potrebe več kot pol milijarde Evropejcev;
Stresses that fisheries (wild fishing as well as aquaculture) is one of the most important pillars of the European Union’s food security and that as such its sustainability and stability must be secured, so that it can in future contribute to the needs of more than half a billion Europeans through fisheries products in qualitative and quantitative terms;
31. poziva Komisijo k širšemu in celovitejšemu pristopu pri svojem zunanjem delovanju, v skladu s konceptom EU o usklajenosti politik za razvoj; opozarja, da nova določba Lizbonske pogodbe zahteva, da se skupna trgovinska politika izvaja ob popolnem spoštovanju načel in ciljev zunanjega delovanja Unije;
Urges the Commission to have a broader and more comprehensive approach in its external action in line with the EU concept of Policy coherence for development; reminds that the new provision of the Lisbon Treaty requests that the Common Commercial Policy shall be conducted in full respect of the principles and objectives of the Union’s external action;
36. v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu pred Evropskim svetom junija 2010 predloži celovit seznam direktiv in uredb za uresničitev ciljev, ki naj bi bili opredeljeni za novo strategijo;
Calls, in this respect, on the Commission to submit to the Council and the European Parliament in the run-up to the June 2010 European Council a comprehensive list of directives and regulations to achieve the goals to be defined for the new strategy;
o strategiji EU 2020
on the EU 2020 strategy
PE441.863v01-00 B7‑0269/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU 2020
PE441.863v01-00 B7‑0269/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU 2020 strategy
– ob upoštevanju izjav Evropskega sveta in Komisije o strategiji EU 2020,
– having regard to statements by the European Council and Commission on the EU 2020 strategy,
A. ker mora strategija EU 2020 stopnjevati gospodarsko rast ter ustvarjati konkurenčnost in delovna mest, a naj bi rast BDP ponovno povečala industrijsko proizvodnjo in izboljšala zaposlovanje,
A. whereas the EU 2020 strategy must push the economic growth and create competitiveness and jobs, with again growth GDP pushing industrial production and creating new employment,
B. ker bi se morala strategija EU 2020 uporabljati kot konkreten program za rast in zaposlovanje, če želimo premagati gospodarsko krizo,
B. whereas the EU 2020 strategy should serve as a concrete programme for growth and employment in order to face the economic crisis,
C. ker lizbonska strategija zaradi šibke upravne strukture, pomanjkanja odgovornosti in pravega okvira EU ter zapletenih končnih ciljev z mnogimi vmesnimi cilji ni prinesla pričakovanega uspeha,
C. whereas the Lisbon Strategy under performed due to a weak governance structure, lack of accountability and of a real EU framework, complex objectives with many targets,
D. ker je sedanja gospodarska in finančna kriza v nekaterih državah članicah nastala zaradi nespoštovanja pravil pakta za stabilnost in rast,
D. whereas the current economic and financial crisis in certain Member States is due to the non respect of the rules of Growth and Stability Pact,
E. ker bi morale države članice povečati ekonomski učinek z uvedbo strukturnih reform, s katerimi bi zmanjšale javno porabo, spodbujale gospodarstvo, nudile malim in srednjim podjetjem več možnosti za razvoj ter uporabljale pozitiven pristop, ker je to boljši način za doseganje gospodarske rasti in zagotavljanje delovnih mest za revne državljane,
E. whereas Member States should increase their economic performance by introducing structural reform reducing public expenditure, pushing economy, giving SMEs more possibility to develop and to have low-friendly approach considering that is the better way to help the economic growth and provide pour citizens with jobs,
1. pozdravlja sklep Sveta o daljnosežnem sporazumu, ki bi zagotavljal stabilnost evra, in vzpostavitvi novega evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo, sestavljenega iz obsežnega svežnja;
Welcomes the decision taken by the Council of a far reaching agreement to ensure the stability of euro and to install a new European Financial Stabilisation mechanism that consists on a comprehensive package;
8. poudarja, da nedavni dogodki dokazujejo, da je treba s srednje- in dolgoročno strategijo EU razviti odločnejše gospodarsko upravljanje območja evra; poudarja, da je lahko monetarni instrument uspešen le, če upošteva družbenoekonomske razmere;
Stresses that the recent events show that the eurozone is in need of bolder economic governance developed in the framework of a medium and long term EU strategy; stresses that a monetary instrument has to take into account the social-economic situation in order to be successful;
11. ugotavlja, da je evro vse bolj ogrožen, ker se grška dolžniška kriza širi na druge države; poziva Komisijo, naj hitro izdela predloge, ki jih je Olli Rehn nedavno predstavil in so namenjeni srednje- in dolgoročni krepitvi upravljanja območja evra, da se prepreči ponovitev sedanje valutne krize;
Acknowledges that the euro is under increasing threat as the Greek debt crisis spreads to other countries; urges the Commission to quickly develop the proposals outlined recently by Olli Rehn for strengthening the management of the eurozone in the medium and long term to avoid any repetition of the current currency crisis;
13. poudarja, da mora Komisija neodvisno od Sveta sprejeti odločitev o tem, ali države članice izpolnjujejo pakt za stabilnost in rast, zato da se v celoti spoštujejo načela tega pakta; meni, da je mogoče predvideti uvedbo stalnih finančnih revizij na osnovi skupnih načel, sprejetih na predlog Komisije;
Underlines that the decision on compliance of Member States with the Stability and Growth Pact should be taken independently from the Council by the Commission in order to fully respect the SGP principles; it is foreseeable to create a constant financial audit based on common criteria decided on the proposal of the Commission;
15. izraža močno zaskrbljenost za dolgoročno vzdržnost javnih financ po finančni in gospodarski krizi; ponovno opozarja, da so bila prizadevanja v okviru pakta za stabilnost in rast pred krizo v veliki meri usmerjena v premagovanje vse večjih demografskih izzivov;
Expresses its deep concern about the long-term sustainability of public finances in the aftermath of the financial and economic crises; recalls that the efforts made in the framework of the SGP prior to the crises were to a very high degree geared towards meeting the growing demographic challenge;
19. poziva Evropski svet, naj prilagodi svojo strategijo EU 2020, pri tem upošteva nedavne odločitve in odloži njeno sprejetje na drugo polovico leta; poudarja, da je treba pred končno odločitvijo o spremenjenem besedilu upoštevati tudi njegovo mnenje;
Urges the European Council to adapt its EU 2020 strategy taking into account the recent decisions and to postpone its adoption to second half of the year; stresses that it should the EP's view before any final decision one the modified text is made;
Potrebna krepitev strukture upravljanja strategije EU 2020
Strengthening of Europe 2020 governance structure necessary
Okrepljena vloga Evropskega parlamenta
Enhanced role for the European Parliament
28. obžaluje, da Parlament kot predstavnik državljanov Evrope ni bil vključen v posvetovanje o kazalcih, ki so osnova za nacionalni program reform EU 2020; poziva Svet, naj odloži svojo odločitev in se najprej posvetuje z njim;
Regrets that Parliament as representative of the citizens of Europe is not consulted on the indicators that are the basis of the EU 2020 National Reform Programme; ask the Council to postpone their decision and to consult first with Parliament;
32. načeloma pozdravlja splošno usmeritev osnutka proračuna za leto 2011, vendar je zaskrbljen zaradi omejenih mejnih vrednosti v različnih postavkah in zato neustrezno odraža sedanje družbene in gospodarske izzive, da bi Unijo spremenili v pametno, trajnostno in na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo;
In principle welcomes the overall direction of the Draft Budget 2011, but is concerned about the tight margins in the different headings and that it does therefore not sufficiently reflect current social and economic challenges to turn the Union into a smart, sustainable and inclusive knowledge-based economy;
33 poudarja, da je s proračunskega vidika nemogoče jasno določiti finančne vplive strategije EU 2020, in sicer proračunske vrstice, ki jih vključujejo vodilne pobude; vendar pa izraža svojo zavezanost dejavnemu prizadevanju v smeri, določeni v okviru proračuna za leto 2011, da bi se na tej stopnji zagotovilo ustrezno financiranje strategije EU 2020.
33 Stresses that it is impossible to identify clearly, from a budgetary point of view, the financial implications of the EU 2020 strategy of the exact budget lines that are covered by the new flagship initiatives; expresses its commitment, however, to actively work to this direction already in the framework of the 2011 Budget, in order to ensure at this stage an adequate financing of the EU 2020 strategy;
17.5.2010 B7-0270/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE za zaključek razprave o izjavah Evropskega sveta in Komisije
17.5.2010 B7-0270/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the European Council and Commission
o novi evropski strategiji za delovna mesta in rast Evropa 2020
on Europe 2020 – new European strategy for jobs and growth
PE441.864v01-00 B7‑0270/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o novi evropski strategiji za delovna mesta in rast Evropa 2020
PE441.864v01.00 B7‑0270/2010 European Parliament resolution on Europe 2020 – new European strategy for jobs and growth
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije KOM(2010)250 o okrepljenem usklajevanju gospodarske politike,
– having regard to the Commission communication COM (2010) 250 on the reinforcement of economic policy coordination,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo,
– having regard to the Council Regulation establishing a European financial Stabilization mechanism,
– ob upoštevanju srečanja Evropskega sveta 25. in 26. marca 2010,
– having regard to the European Council of 25-26 March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z naslovom: Evropa 2020 „Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication on Europe 2020 ‘A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM(2010) 2020),
– ob upoštevanju členov 3 in 122 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 3 and 122 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju izjav Evropskega sveta in Komisije o novi evropski strategiji za delovna mesta in rast Evropa 2020,
– having regard to statements by the European Council and the Commission on Europe 2020 – new European strategy for jobs and growth,
A. ker Komisija v svojih posvetovanjih o prihodnji strategiji EU 2020 ni predvidela primernega postopka posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi in sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta,
A. whereas the Commission’s consultation on the future EU 2020 strategy lacks a proper process of consultation of stakeholders and EP involvement,
B. ker cilji, določeni v lizbonski strategiji, niso bili uresničeni; ker mora zato opredelitev prihodnje strategije EU 2020 temeljiti na pravilni in nadrobni oceni lizbonske strategije,
B. whereas the objectives set in the Lisbon Strategy have not been attained; whereas the definition of the future EU 2020 strategy needs therefore to be based on a proper and thorough assessment of the Lisbon Strategy,
C. ker je bilo zaradi krize ukinjenih na milijone delovnih mest in sta se poglobili negotovost zaposlitve ter revščina; ker grozi 16 % prebivalcev EU revščina; ker je 9,6 % prebivalcev EU brezposelnih; ker 8 % zaposlenih prebivalcev EU velja za „revne zaposlene“ z dohodki pod 60 % nacionalnega povprečja,
C. whereas the crisis has been wiping out millions of jobs and has aggravated job precariousness and poverty; whereas 16% of EU inhabitants are at risk of poverty; whereas 9.6% of EU inhabitants are unemployed ; whereas 8% of employed EU inhabitants are considered to be 'working poor', with an income below 60% of the national medium,
D. ker se je v gospodarski in finančni krizi pokazala strukturna ranljivost EU, še posebej pa evroobmočja; ker so razmere v Grčiji in drugih občutljivih državah evropske monetarne unije (EMU), ki so se v zadnjih tednih izoblikovale v sistemsko krizo evroobmočja, izjemno zaskrbljujoče in pomenijo nujen izziv za širše in hitrejše gospodarsko povezovanje EU,
D. whereas the economic and financial crisis has exposed the EU's – and more specifically the euro zone's – structural vulnerability; whereas the situation in Greece and other vulnerable EMU countries which has morphed in the last weeks into a systemic crisis of the eurozone is a matter of alarm and an urgent challenge for a broader and faster EU economic integration,
E. ker so lahka dostopnost posojil, kratkoročna usmerjenost, deregulacija financ ter prekomerna zadolženost in tveganje na finančnih trgih spodbudili špekulativno ravnanje, ki je privedlo do napihnjene rasti in povečanja nevzdržnega neravnovesja v EU in po svetu; ker kriza pomeni tudi obsežen prenos bogastva iz javnega v zasebni sektor;
E. whereas the availability of easy credit, short-termism, the deregulation of finance and excessive debt and risk-taking in financial markets have fuelled speculative behaviour, which in turn has led to a bubble-driven growth and the rise of unsustainable EU internal and global imbalances, Whereas the crisis involves a massive transfer of wealth from the public to the private sector,
F. ker podnebne spremembe terjajo temeljite in nujne ukrepe,
F. whereas climate change requires drastic and urgent action,
H. ker je pospešen prehod na zeleno gospodarstvo visoke učinkovitosti, ki bo docela temeljilo na obnovljivih virih energije, edina možnost za boj proti podnebnim spremembam, ohranjanje zanesljive oskrbe ter zagotavljanje visoke stopnje zaposlenosti in socialne kohezije,
H. whereas there is no option but to accelerate the transition to a green fully renewables-based highly efficient economy in order to tackle climate change, ensure security of supply and deliver high employment and social cohesion,
I. ker je okoljsko trajnost mogoče zagotoviti le z učinkovito in manjšo uporabo virov v absolutnem merilu,
I. whereas resource efficiency and a reduction of resource use in absolute terms are required in order to ensure environmental sustainability,
K. ker se jasno kaže potreba po pravičnejši razdelitvi dela in varstva med moškimi in ženskami, izboljšanju položaja žensk na trgu dela in splošno po uveljavljanju enakosti med spoloma,
K. whereas there is a clear need to divide labour and care more equally between men and women, improve the situation of women in the labour market and more broadly pursue gender equality,
M. ker Komisija v svoji predstavi o prihodnosti strategije EU 2020 ni upoštevala pomembne vloge biotske raznovrstnosti in kmetijstva ter širše vloge, ki jo ima kmetijsko gospodarstvo za zanesljivost preskrbe s hrano, upravljanje naravnih virov in zaposlovanje ter njegovega velikega potenciala za boj proti podnebnim spremembam in drugim pomembnim izzivom; ker so bili okoljski, socialni in ekonomski stroški izginevanja biotske raznovrstnosti v poročilu TEEB (Ekonomija ekosistemov in biotske raznovrstnosti) za leto 2008 ocenjeni na 1,35 do 3,1 bilijonov EUR na leto oziroma do leta 2050 na 7% svetovnega BDP,
M. whereas the Commission's vision of the future of the EU 2020 strategy ignores the important role of biodiversity as well as of agriculture and the wider role that rural economies play in securing food supply, natural resources management and employment and their great potential to combat climate change and other key challenges; whereas biodiversity loss has a worldwide environmental, social and economic cost estimated in the TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity) Report at between EUR 1 350 and 3 100 billion per annum in 2008 and at 7% of global GDP by 2050,
N. ker se v sedanjih stališčih Komisije in Evropskega sveta o strategiji EU 2020 kaže nedvoumno nezavedanje, da je potrebna korenita reforma skupne kmetijske politike in politike razvoja podeželja, da bi lahko zagotovili varnost oskrbe s hrano, vzpostavili trajnostne prakse z upravljanjem voda in tal, zmanjšali odvisnost od nafte, ohranili biotsko raznovrstnost in trajnostno diverzificirali zaposlovanje v kmetijstvu in kmetijskem gospodarstvu,
N. whereas the current Commission and European Council positions on the EU 2020 strategy show a clear unawareness of the need to substantially reform the Common Agricultural Policy and rural development policies in order to in sure food security, establish sustainable practices through water and soil management, reduce dependence on oil, preserve biodiversity and diversify employment in agriculture and the rural economy in a sustainable way,
O. ker proračun EU znaša samo 2,5 % skupnih javnih izdatkov v EU in manj kot 1 % BDP Evropske unije,
O. whereas the EU budget represents only 2.5% of total public expenditure in the EU and less than 1% of the EU's GDP,
P. ker je Evropski svet pri vmesnem pregledu lizbonske strategije marca 2005 potrdil, da je treba strategijo obravnavati v širšem kontekstu trajnostnega razvoja, ki velja za vodilno načelo vseh politik in dejavnosti Unije;
P. whereas the European Council reaffirmed in the framework of the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy in March 2005 that the Strategy was to be seen in the wider context of the sustainable development which is considered a key principle governing all the Union’s policies and activities,
Q. ker Lizbonska pogodba jasno določa, da Unija opredeli in izvaja svoje zunanje delovanje zato, da spodbuja trajnostni gospodarski, družbeni in okoljski razvoj držav v razvoju, pri čemer je glavni cilj odprava revščine, ter da spodbuja vključevanje vseh držav v svetovno gospodarstvo,
Q. whereas the Lisbon Treaty clearly stipulates that the Union shall define and pursue its external action in order to foster sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary objective of eradicating poverty and in order to encourage the integration of all countries into the world economy,
1. poudarja, da bi morala biti dva glavna cilja strategije EU 2020 v sedanji globoki gospodarski in socialni krizi nujno zagotoviti socialno varstvo in se odzvati na okoljski izziv;
Emphasises that the two main goals of the EU 2020 strategy in the current context of deep economic and social crisis should be to secure, as a matter of urgency, social protection and to respond to the environmental challenge;
3. ocenjuje, da sedanja kriza izpostavlja ranljivost in slabosti modela EU za upravljanje in razvoj, ki se je uporabljal v zadnjih tridesetih letih;
Deems that the current crisis highlights the vulnerability and the weakness of the EU governance and development model adopted during the last thirty years;
6. je seznanjen s Sporočilom Komisije KOM (2010) 250 kot velikim prispevkom k daljnosežnim reformam upravljanja EU; meni, da bi morali prihodnji predlogi Komisije o gospodarskem nadzoru temeljiti na členu 121(6), da bi sprejeli s tem povezane nadaljnje predloge s soodločanjem po rednem zakonodajnem postopku;
Takes note of the Commission communication COM (2010) 250 as a substantial contribution to a far reaching governance reform of the EU; deems that forthcoming Commission's proposals on economic surveillance should be based on article 121(6) in order to adopt further proposals in this respect in co-decision following the ordinary legislative procedure;
10. poudarja, da je treba razširiti sedanje mehanizme usklajevanja politik na območju evra, da bodo kos sedanjim in prihodnjim ekonomskim neravnovesjem in odstopanjem v evroobmočju; v zvezi s tem obžaluje, da med vladami ni zavezujočih obveznosti o okrepitvi usklajevanja v EMU in širše v EU;
Points out that the current mechanisms for policy coordination within the euro area needs to be enlarged in order to cope with current and future economic imbalances and divergences within the euro area; regrets in this context that there are no binding commitments among governments to enforce coordination within EMU and more broadly the EU;
13. meni, da je nujno treba pregledati pravila pakta za stabilnost in razvoj, ki niso bila zasnovana za pokrizne ravni nakopičenega dolga v številnih državah članicah ali za spremljanje razvoja zasebnega dolga;
Considers it necessary to review the rules of the SGP, which were not designed for the purposes of the expected post-crisis levels of accumulated debt in many Member States or for the purpose of monitoring the evolution of private debt;
16. poziva države s presežkom na tekočem računu, naj spodbujajo zaposlovanje in notranje povpraševanje, med drugim s povečanjem naložb za trajnost in odpravo omejevanja plač; poziva države, ki imajo primanjkljaj v tekočem računu, naj zajezijo prekomerno porabo in povečajo trajnostne naložbe;
Calls upon countries with current account surpluses to stimulate employment and internal demand inter alia by increasing investment for sustainability and ending wage moderation,; calls upon countries with current account deficits to curb excessive consumption and increase sustainable investment;
Znatno izboljšanje regulacije in nadzora finančnih trgov
A substantial enhancement of financial regulation and supervision
i) trden okvir za preprečevanje na podlagi boja proti špekulacijam in internalizacije negativnih zunanjih vplivov, ki jo povzročajo finančni trgi, na podlagi načela „plača povzročitelj obremenitve“, ki vključuje:
i) a strong prevention framework based on the fight against speculation and the internalization of negative externalities created by financial markets on the basis of the principle 'polluter pays' including:
– davek na finančne transakcije in progresivne obdavčitve bank,
- a financial transaction tax and progressive bank levies,