natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obsoja uporabo političnih zavezništev za zaščito nekaterih držav pred pregledom, namesto da bi se kritično ocenjevala stanje in zaščita človekovih pravic, kar resno ogroža namen splošnega rednega pregleda; ugotavlja, da je ta praksa dosegla nevarno raven pri pregledu Tunizije, ki je vključeval izjave, ki so se močno razlikovale od ugotovitev neodvisnih strokovnjakov; ugotavlja pa, da ta primer očitno ni odražal trenda;
Denounces the use of political alliances to shield certain States from scrutiny rather than to critically assess human rights conditions and protections, which seriously undermines the very purpose of the UPR; notes that this practice reached a dangerous level in the review of Tunisia, which contained declarations significantly contradicting independent experts' findings; notes, however, that that particular review did not seem to reflect a trend;
pozdravlja odločitev EU, da ne bo izvajala skupnih posredovanj pri pregledih držav, ampak bo zagotavljala skladnost posredovanj, da bo mogoče zastaviti vprašanja širokega spektra; v zvezi s tem opozarja na poskuse EU glede odpravljanja mentalitete "blokovske razdelitve" na UNHRC z medsebojnim zastavljanjem vprašanj držav članic EU o rezultatih; pozdravlja stopnjo sodelovanja držav članic EU pri pregledih, vključno s tistimi, ki zadevajo druge države članice EU; spodbuja EU, naj še naprej oblikuje model ohlapnega usklajevanja in naj zagotavlja, da EU ustrezno natančno obravnava vse države in vse teme in da prepreči podvajanje;
Welcomes the EU's decision not to make joint interventions in the country reviews but to ensure the complementarity of interventions so that the broad spectrum of issues may be raised; stresses in this respect the EU's attempts to break down the "bloc mentality" at the UNHRC by EU Member States raising questions on each other's record; welcomes the level of engagement of EU Member States in reviews, including those relating to other EU Member States; encourages the EU to build further on the current model of "loose coordination", and to ensure that all countries and all topics are covered by EU Member States in sufficient depth and that any repetition is avoided;
je zaskrbljen, ker v več primerih končno poročilo v okviru splošnega rednega pregleda in interaktiven dialog med pregledom nista odražala informacij iz povzetkov dokumentov ali sta bila celo v nasprotju z ugotovitvami neodvisnih strokovnjakov, zaradi česar je bil postopek pregleda neprimeren, in ker so bila priporočila iz poročil delovne skupine preveč nejasna in niso imela operativne vsebine; poziva člane delovne skupine za splošni redni pregled, da v okviru prihodnjih pregledov na podlagi informacij, ki so jih pridobili neodvisni mehanizmi za nadzor ali nevladne organizacije, zagotovijo merljiva, konkretna, realistična in k žrtvam usmerjena priporočila;
Expresses concern that, in several cases, the final report of the UPR and the interactive dialogue during the review did not reflect the information contained in the summary documents or even contradicted independent experts' findings, thus depriving the review process of its pertinence, and that the recommendations put forward in the reports of the Working Group were too vague and lacked any operational substance; calls on the members of the UPR Working Group to provide measurable, concrete, realistic and victim-oriented recommendations in its future reviews, based on information established by independent monitoring mechanisms or NGOs;
obžaluje nezavezujoč značaj priporočil iz splošnega rednega pregleda, ki izhaja iz pravice, da splošni redni pregled omogoča državam, da se odločijo, katera priporočila lahko sprejmejo; ugotavlja, da je bil v nekaterih primerih, kot v primeru Šrilanke, odstotek sprejetih priporočil nizek; meni pa, da vsa priporočila morda niso koristna ali v skladu z mednarodnimi obvezami na področju človekovih pravic; zato meni, da to dokazuje, da se splošni redni pregled v nekaterih primerih morda ne bo izkazal kot najuporabnejši instrument, ter poudarja pomen neodvisnih mehanizmov za nadzor in ugotovitev nevladnih organizacij v postopku splošnega rednega pregleda, pri čemer se ohranijo mandati držav Komisije Združenih narodov za človekove pravice;
Regrets the non-binding character of UPR recommendations, which stems from the right that the UPR affords States to decide which recommendations they can accept; notes that in some cases, such as that of Sri Lanka, the percentage of accepted recommendations was low; considers, however, that not all recommendations may be valuable or in line with international human rights obligations; therefore considers that this shows that the UPR may prove not to be the most useful instrument in certain cases, and highlights the importance of independent monitoring mechanisms and findings in the UPR process by NGOs while maintaining UNCHR country mandates;
obsoja poskuse nekaterih držav članic UNHRC, da cenzurirajo prispevke nevladnih organizacij; obžaluje omejen vpliv sodelovanja nevladnih organizacij pri končni odločitvi, glede na to, da imajo v razpravi o poročilu splošnega rednega pregleda omejen čas za govor, in da je obseg njihovega posredovanja omejen, kar jim omogoča, da podajajo le splošne pripombe, ne pa da ponovno obravnavajo vprašanja, o katerih se je razpravljalo v delovnih skupinah;
Condemns the attempts made by certain UNHRC member states to censor contributions from NGOs; regrets the limited impact of NGO participation on the outcome decision, given the limited speaking time assigned to them for discussing the UPR report as well as the limited permitted scope of their interventions, which allows them to make general comments but not to re-open issues discussed in the Working Groups;
obžaluje pomanjkanje vključujočega nacionalnega posvetovanja glede poročil držav članic Združenih narodov, pri čemer bi sodelovale nevladne organizacije; zato poziva vse države, ki so predmet pregleda, naj se na pregleden način vključijo v izčrpne razprave stanju na področju človekovih pravic pri njih, pri čemer naj vključijo vse sektorje vlade in civilne družbe ter upoštevajo, da je glavni namen postopka pregleda izboljšanje stanja človekovih pravic na terenu;
Regrets the lack of inclusive national consultations, involving the participation of NGOs, on UN member states' reports; consequently, urges all States under review to engage in a substantive discussion of their human rights record in a transparent manner, involving all sectors of government and civil society and bearing in mind that the main objective of the review process is the improvement of human rights on the ground;
poziva vse države, naj na podlagi priporočil iz pregleda izvedejo obsežno nacionalno posvetovanje; poziva EU, naj nadalje preučijo, kako je mogoče ta priporočila uporabiti pri razvoju programov tehnične pomoči;
Calls on all States to carry out an extensive national consultation following the review, on the basis of its recommendations; calls on the EU to investigate further how those recommendations can be used in the development of technical assistance programmes;
poziva UNHRC, da si še naprej prizadeva za povečanje odgovornosti držav članic Združenih narodov na področju človekovih pravic, in sicer tako, da poveča učinkovitost splošnega rednega pregleda, zlasti s poostritvijo postopkov, da se prepreči namerno oviranje ali preusmerjevalne taktike, ki ogrožajo same cilje Združenih narodov, UNHRC in splošnega rednega pregleda;
Calls on the UNHRC to sustain efforts aimed at increasing the accountability of UN member states in the field of human rights by increasing the efficiency of the UPR, notably by tightening up procedures with a view to avoiding deliberate obstruction or diversionary tactics, which undermine the very goals of the UN, the UNHRC and the UPR;
ponovno poudarja pomen sodelovanja civilne družbe pri delu UNHRC in poziva države članice EU, da uvedejo učinkovite načine in instrumente, ki bi civilni družbi omogočili sodelovanje v UNHRC, in uporabljajo posebne pravice, ki jim jih zagotavlja njihov posvetovalni status, namreč da predlagajo pisna sporočila in dajejo ustne izjave;
Reiterates the importance of participation by civil society in the work of the UNHRC, and urges the EU Member States to introduce effective ways and instruments enabling civil society to participate in the UNHRC and to avail themselves of the prerogatives granted by their consultative status to submit written communications and make oral declarations;
pozdravlja ohranitev prakse sodelovanja nevladnih organizacij za človekove pravice v razpravah in upa, da se bo to sodelovanje v prihodnosti izboljšalo in okrepilo; ponovno poziva k reformi Odbora Združenih narodov za nevladne organizacije, da bi zagotovili učinkovito udeležbo neodvisnih nevladnih organizacij, in poudarja, da morajo priporočila za akreditacijo dati neodvisni strokovnjaki na podlagi dela in prispevkov nevladnih organizacij;
Welcomes the retention of the practice of the participation of human rights NGOs in the debates and hopes that this participation will be improved and strengthened in the future; reiterates its call for a reform of the UN Committee on NGOs, so as to ensure the effective participation of independent NGOs, and points out that recommendations for accreditation must be made by independent experts on the basis of the work and contributions of NGOs;
ugotavlja, da status UNHRC kot stalnega organa predstavlja posebne izzive za nevladne organizacije, ki imajo sedež zunaj Ženeve; zato pozdravlja prispevke agencij, ki se namesto nevladnih organizacij povezujejo z Uradom visokega komisarja za človekove pravice in uradom Združenih narodov v Ženevi, da nevladnim organizacijam zagotovijo informacije o dejavnostih in olajšujejo njihovo sodelovanje pri dejavnostih UNHRC;
Notes that the UNHRC's character as a permanent body presents particular challenges to NGOs not based in Geneva; welcomes, therefore, the contributions of the agencies liaising on behalf of NGOs with the OHCHR and the UN Office in Geneva to providing NGOs with information about activities and facilitating their participation in the work of the UNHRC;
poziva donatorje, da obravnavajo potrebe organizacij za človekove pravice, zlasti tistih, ki nimajo sedeža v Ženevi, glede usposabljanja in finančnih sredstev, da bodo lahko dosledno in učinkovito sodelovale pri dejavnostih UNHRC; poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej podpira pobude civilne družbe glede nadzora vladnih politik na področju človekovih pravic v okviru Združenih narodov;
Calls on donors to address the training and funding needs of human rights organisations, especially those not based in Geneva, in such a way as to enable them to participate consistently and effectively in the work of the UNHRC; calls on the Commission to further support civil society initiatives for the scrutiny of government policies on UN human rights issues;
obžaluje pomanjkanje zanimanja javnosti za UNHRC in poznavanja te organizacije; zato pozdravlja pobude Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice, namenjene povečanju preglednosti, predvsem o oblikovanju biltena neuradnih srečanj; pozdravlja predvajanje zasedanj UNHRC prek spleta, ki je namenjeno povečanju osveščenosti javnosti glede njihovega dela;
Regrets the lack of public interest in, and knowledge of, the UNHRC; welcomes, therefore, the initiatives of the OHCHR aimed at increasing transparency, namely the creation of the "Bulletin of informal meetings"; welcomes the web-streaming of the sessions of the UNHRC, designed to raise public awareness of its work;
Urad visokega komisarja za človekove pravice
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
ponovno poudarja svoje mnenje, da je Urad visokega komisarja za človekove pravice ključen organ v Združenih narodih, saj ima bistveno vlogo pri zaščiti in spoštovanju človekovih pravic tako, da te pravice vključuje v celoten sistem Združenih narodov in v vse ustrezne organizacije, zlasti glede dejavnosti, ki so povezane s ponovno vzpostavitvijo ali krepitvijo miru, razvojem ali humanitarnimi dejavnostmi;
Reaffirms its opinion that the OHCHR is a key body within the UN system since it plays a crucial role in protecting and upholding human rights by mainstreaming those rights throughout the UN system and within all relevant organisations, notably in connection with activities linked to the restoration or strengthening of peace, development and humanitarian action;
ponovno poudarja svojo podporo Uradu visokega komisarja za človekove pravice ter svojo zavezanost k integriteti pristojnosti tega organa ter k njegovi neodvisnosti in nepristranskosti;
Reaffirms its support for the OHCHR and its attachment to the integrity of that body's remit, as well as to its independence and impartiality;
spodbuja prizadevanja Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice, da okrepi svojo prisotnost na terenu tako, da odpre regionalne urade; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja podpis memoranduma o soglasju med Uradom visokega komisarja za človekove pravice in organi Republike Kirgizije o ustanovitvi regionalne pisarne Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice v Biškeku; ponovno izraža hvaležnost za delo, ki ga Urad visokega komisarja za človekove pravice opravlja v podporo organom za spremljanje izvajanja pogodb in posebnih postopkov;
Encourages the efforts of the OHCHR to strengthen its presence on the ground through the opening of regional offices; in this respect, welcomes the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the OHCHR and the authorities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the opening of an OHCHR regional office in Bishkek; reiterates its appreciation of the work done by the OHCHR in support of treaty bodies and Special Procedures;
ceni delo gospe Louise Arbour kot visoke komisarke za človekove pravice, poleg zavezanosti in integritete, ki ju je pokazala, ter verjame, da bo njena naslednica, Navanethem Pillay, delala s podobnim navdušenjem in se zmogla soočiti z izzivi tega delovnega mesta;
Expresses its appreciation of the work of Ms Louise Arbour as High Commissioner for Human Rights, together with the commitment and integrity that she has shown, and is confident that her successor, Ms Navanethem Pillay, will engage with similar enthusiasm and live up to the challenges of the post;
pozdravlja prostovoljne prispevke, ki jih je Komisija več let namenjala Uradu visokega komisarja za človekove pravice, vključno s 4 milijoni EUR za leto 2008 v okviru Evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice; poziva države članice EU, naj še naprej podpirajo Urad visokega komisarja za človekove pravice, zlasti v upravnem in proračunskem petem odboru Generalne skupščine, in tako preprečijo vsakršno poseganje v njegovo neodvisnost ter zagotovijo, da se mu dodelijo vsa finančna sredstva, potrebna za izvajanje mandata;
Welcomes the voluntary contributions that the Commission has for years made to the OHCHR, including EUR 4 million for 2008, under the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights; calls on the EU Member States to continue to support the OHCHR, especially in the Administrative and Budgetary Fifth Committee of the General Assembly, so as to ensure that there is no interference with its independence and that it is granted all the financial resources needed to enable it to carry out its mandate;
pozdravlja aktivno sodelovanje EU v prvih treh letih delovanja UNHRC, in sicer prek oblikovanja ali sodelovanja pri oblikovanju resolucij, izdajanja izjav, posredovanja v interaktivnih dialogih in razpravah ter uspešnega pozivanja k izrednim zasedanjem o razmerah na področju človekovih pravic v Darfurju decembra 2006, v Burmi/Mjanmaru oktobra 2007 in na vzhodu Demokratične republike Kongo novembra 2008; priznava zaveze EU glede obravnavanja razmer v posameznih državah v okviru UNHRC;
Welcomes the EU's active participation in the first three years of functioning of the UNHRC, namely through sponsoring or co-sponsoring resolutions, issuing statements, intervening in interactive dialogues and debates, and successfully calling for special sessions on the situation regarding human rights in Darfur in December 2006, in Burma/Myanmar in October 2007 and in the East of the Democratic Republic of the Congo in November 2008; recognises the commitments made by the EU to addressing country situations in the UNHRC;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bile vse resolucije, ki jih je EU predlagala ali je pri njihovem oblikovanju sodelovala, sprejete s strani UNHRC na prvih devetih rednih zasedanjih in prvih osmih izrednih zasedanjih; vendar ugotavlja, da se o številnih spornih in nesporazumnih vprašanjih ni glasovalo;
Welcomes the fact that all of the resolutions proposed or co-sponsored by the EU have been approved by the UNHRC during its first nine regular sessions and first eight special sessions; notes, however, that many controversial and non-consensual issues were not put to a vote;
ugotavlja, da so države članice EU, ki sodelujejo v UNHRC, razdeljene v dve regionalni skupini, in sicer na skupino zahodnoevropskih držav in skupino vzhodnoevropskih držav; ugotavlja, da EU nasprotuje sistemu, po katerem vsaka regija predlaga le toliko kandidatov, kot je mest (sistem zaprtih kandidatur), ki vodi v to, da države članice EU med seboj tekmujejo za izvolitev v UNHRC;
Takes note that the EU Member States participating in the UNHRC are split into two regional groupings, namely the Western European States group and the Eastern European States group; notes that the EU opposes the system whereby each region proposes only as many candidates as there are seats (the "clean slate" system), which results, effectively, in EU Member States competing between themselves for election to the UNHRC;
poziva EU, naj še naprej vztraja pri oblikovanju meril za izvolitev v UNHRC, vključno z izdajanjem stalnih povabil za nosilce mandatov za posebne postopke, in pri spremljanju dejanskega izvajanja volilnih obljub držav članic Združenih narodov; prav tako ponovno poziva k uporabi tega pravila pri odločanju o tem, ali bi morala EU podpreti države kandidatke; obžaluje ker EU te zahteve še ni izpolnila;
Encourages the EU to continue to press for the establishment of membership criteria for election to the UNHRC, including the issuing of permanent invitations to Special Procedures mandate-holders, as well as for monitoring of the actual implementation of the UN member states" election pledges; also reiterates its call for this rule to be applied in determining whether the EU should support candidate countries; regrets that this request has not yet been upheld by the EU;
ugotavlja, da je EU znotraj UNHRC v številčni manjšini, kar gotovo predstavlja izziv pri uveljavljanju njenih stališč; pozdravlja prakso "osveščanja" drugih članic UNHRC in "porazdelitve bremena" med državami članicami EU, ki je bila izpostavljena med slovenskim predsedovanjem; poziva države članice EU, da še naprej razvijajo in krepijo to prakso;
Notes that the EU finds itself in a numerical minority within the UNHRC, which certainly presents a challenge when it comes to making its voice heard; welcomes the practice put forward during the Slovenian presidency of "outreach" towards other UNHRC members and burden-sharing between EU Member States; calls on the EU Member States to further develop and strengthen this practice;
pozdravlja naraščajoči trend, v skladu s katerim države članice EU poleg predsedovanja EU sodelujejo v razpravah; poziva, naj se ta trend še nadalje razvije, države članice EU pa poziva, da okrepijo sporočilo EU z uveljavitvijo načela "eno sporočilo z več glasovi"; spodbuja države članice EU, naj še naprej razvijajo medregionalne pobude kot koristen način za boj proti blokovskim politikam; poziva EU in Organizacijo islamske konference, naj okrepita prizadevanja za izboljšanje medsebojnega razumevanja in sodelovanja;
Welcomes the increasing trend whereby EU Member States intervene in the debates in addition to the EU Presidency; calls for this to be further developed, and calls on EU Member States to reinforce the EU's message by putting across "one message, but with many voices"; encourages EU Member States to further develop cross-regional initiatives as a useful way of counteracting bloc policies; calls on the EU and the Organisation of The Islamic Conference to intensify efforts to improve their mutual understanding and collaboration;
podpira pristop EU pri iskanju usklajenega, skupnega stališča pri UNHRC; vendar obžaluje, da v postopku oblikovanja skupne politike med državami članicami EU pri UNHRC EU pogosto sodeluje na forumu UNHRC z najmanjšim skupnim imenovalcem, s čimer omejuje dinamiko diplomatskega potenciala EU z drugimi regionalnimi skupinami; spodbuja visokega predstavnika EU za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko, Javierja Solano, naj podeli mandat svojemu osebnemu predstavniku za demokracijo in človekove pravice – po potrebi z napotitvijo osebnih odposlancev – ki bo v Afriki, Aziji in Latinski Ameriki vodil intenzivna pogajanja o vprašanjih, o katerih se razpravlja v UNHRC, z namenom, da bi države drugih blokov vključili v skupne pobude na ravni Združenih narodov;
Supports the EU's stance in seeking a coordinated, common position at the UNHRC; regrets however that, in the process of achieving a common policy amongst the EU Member States at the UNHRC, the EU often arrives at the UNHRC forum with the lowest common denominator, thereby restricting the dynamics of the EU diplomatic potential with other regional groupings; encourages the EU High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, Javier Solana, to give a mandate to his Personal Representative for Democracy and Human Rights – if necessary by dispatching personal envoys – to conduct intensive consultations in Africa, Asia and Latin America on issues discussed at the UNHRC, with a view to engaging with countries from other blocs in common initiatives at the UN level;
obžaluje, da delno zaradi časa in prizadevanj, ki so potrebni za doseganje skupnega stališča, EU ni mogla učinkovito izvajati vpliva v širšem sistemu Združenih narodov; poziva EU, da ostane zavezana doseganju skupnega stališča, obenem pa postane bolj prilagodljiva glede manj pomembnih vprašanj, da bo lahko v pogajanjih o temeljnih vprašanjih ukrepala hitreje in učinkoviteje;
Regrets that, partly due to the time and effort needed to reach a common position, the EU has not been able to exercise influence effectively within the wider UN system; calls on the EU, while remaining committed to achieving a common position, to increase its flexibility on minor issues so as to become capable of acting more rapidly and efficiently in negotiations on fundamental issues;
obžaluje nekoliko obramben odnos EU v UNHRC, zlasti njeno nasprotovanje predložitvi resolucij o razmerah v posameznih državah, saj te pogosto naletijo na velik odpor v nekaterih državah, ter njeno namerno izbiro konsenza in izogibanje besedam, ki bi povzročile nasprotovanje, kar na koncu privede do sprejetja kompromisov, ki ne odražajo preferenc EU, kot v primeru resolucij, sprejetih dne 27. marca 2007 o razmerah na področju človekovih pravic v Sudanu Resolucija A/HRC/7/16.
Regrets the rather defensive attitude adopted by the EU in the UNHRC, in particular its reluctance to put forward resolutions on country situations, as these usually meet with intense resistance from particular countries, as well as its deliberate choice of consensus and its tendency to avoid language that would generate opposition, which in turn results in the acceptance of compromises that do not reflect the EU's preferences, as in the case of the resolutions adopted on 27 March 2007 on the situation of human rights in the Sudan Resolution A/HRC/7/16.
in dne 13. decembra 2007 o skupini strokovnjakov za Darfur Resolucija A/HRC/6/35
and on 13 December 2007 on the Group of Experts on the situation of human rights in Darfur Resolution A/HRC/6/35.
, kar je povzročilo, da je bila skupina razpuščena kljub temu, da je EU prvotno podpirala njeno ohranitev;
, which resulted in the Group being disbanded despite the EU having originally pushed for it to be maintained;