natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja tudi kritiko upravičencev glede števila priročnikov, navodil o upravnih pregledih, delovnih dokumentov in pravil o sodelovanju, ki se uporabljajo za donacije; zahteva konsolidacijo teh dokumentov in razpravo s Parlamentom glede poenostavitve izvedbenih pravil;
Also notes with concern beneficiaries' criticism of the number of manuals, guidance notes, working documents and participation rules applicable to grants; calls for those documents to be consolidated and for discussion with Parliament on simplifying the implementing rules;
meni, da kontrolni sistemi odražajo zapletenost uredb in pravil različnih, včasih prekrivajočih se ravni; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši izvajanje poenostavitve ob polnem sodelovanju Parlamenta; poziva države članice in regije, naj sprejmejo enake ukrepe;
Emphasises that control systems are a reflection of the complexity of regulations and rules on the various, sometimes overlapping levels; urges therefore the Commission to accelerate the simplification exercise whilst fully involving Parliament; asks Member States and regions to undertake the same efforts;
zahteva, da Komisija pregleda pogoje za uporabo standardne metode, da se poveča zanesljivost v prid upravičencem; meni, da je nesprejemljivo naknadno imeti pomisleke glede izbire fiksnih zneskov;
Calls on the Commission to review the conditions for using the flat-rate method so as to increase reliability in beneficiaries' interest; regards it as unacceptable to dispute - after the event - the flat rates opted for;
obžaluje, da je prišlo do zamude pri izvajanju ukrepa 4 akcijskega načrta za integrirani okvir notranje kontrole, ki zadeva vzpostavitev medinstitucionalne pobude o osnovnih načelih, ki jih je treba upoštevati v zvezi z dopustnimi tveganji pri transakcijah, povezanih z računovodskimi izkazi;
Deplores the fact that Action 4 of the Action Plan, concerning the launching of an interinstitutional initiative on the basic principles to be considered regarding the risks to be tolerated in the underlying transactions, is being implemented late;
ravno tako s tem v zvezi opozarja na pomen ukrepa 10 iz omenjenega akcijskega načrta, ki predlaga izvedbo analize stroškov kontrol, saj je treba doseči primerno ravnovesje med stroški in koristmi kontrol;
Points also, in this context, to the importance of Action 10 of the Action Plan, which proposes making an 'analysis of the costs of controls', in view of the 'need to reach an appropriate balance between the costs and benefits of controls';
pričakuje tudi, da bo letno poročilo o dejavnostih generalnih direktoratov ponovno vsebovalo informacije o kakovosti kontrol v državah članicah in o njihovem izboljšanju ter poziva Komisijo, da uvrsti vse plačilne agencije in certifikacijske organe;
Also expects the annual activity reports of the directorates-general to include, again, information on the quality of, and improvement in, controls in the Member States, and calls on the Commission to grade all payment agencies and certification bodies;
zahteva, da Komisija redno predstavi oceno integriranega sistema notranje kontrole, in zahteva, da letno poročilo o dejavnostih in zbirno poročilo še bolje pokrivata službe Komisije in sistem držav članic z deljenim upravljanjem, zlasti glede tehnične kakovosti in etičnih vidikov, na primer raven neodvisnosti nacionalnih revizijskih organov;
Calls on the Commission to present regular assessments of the integrated internal control system, and calls for even better coverage – in the annual activity reports and the synthesis report – of Commission departments' and Member States' shared-management systems, in particular as regards technical quality and ethical considerations, e.g. the level of independence of national audit authorities;
zahteva, da Komisija izvede celovito in izčrpno oceno odhodkov in sredstev, ki so namenjeni sistemom kontrole po področju porabe, in to za vsa področja porabe Unije, kot je zahteval Parlament v svojih resolucijah o razrešnici v prejšnjih letih ter z vidika koncepta doseganja rezultatov;
Calls on the Commission to carry out a more complete and exhaustive evaluation of the resources given over to control systems, by spending area, for all Union spending areas, as called for by Parliament in its discharge resolutions in previous years and in view of the "getting results" concept;
ravno tako poziva Komisijo, da na osnovi prejetih letnih povzetkov analizira prednosti in pomanjkljivosti nacionalnih sistemov vsake države članice na področju uprave in kontrole sredstev Skupnostim, skupaj z oceno stroškov nacionalnih kontrolnih sistemov sredstev Skupnosti; opozarja Komisijo na njeno zavezanost izboljšanju kakovosti letnih povzetkov držav članic, da bi postali koristni instrumenti za zmanjšanje tveganja napak v prihodnjih letih; zahteva, naj Komisija izpolni svoje obljube v tem oziru;
Calls on the Commission in addition, on the basis of the annual summaries received, to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of each Member State's national system for the administration and control of Community funds, together with an estimate of the cost of national systems for the control of Community funds; reminds the Commission of its commitment to improve the quality of the annual summaries of the Member States in order to make them useful instruments to mitigate the risk of errors for the years to come; asks the Commission to live up to its commitment in this respect;
meni, da bi morala biti ta primerjalna analiza posredovana Parlamentu, Svetu in Računskemu sodišču konec leta 2009/začetek leta 2010 in bi morala služiti kot podlaga za medinstitucionalno razpravo o dopustnem tveganju napake;
Considers that that comparative analysis should be forwarded to Parliament, the Council and the ECA in late 2009 or early 2010 and should serve as a basis for interinstitutional dialogue on tolerable risk of error;
ugotavlja, da je medtem, ko je stopnja dopustnega tveganja bistven pojem v okviru integrirane notranje kontrole, ki jo mora upoštevati Računsko sodišče pri podajanju izjave o zanesljivosti, v skladu z mnenjem št. 4/2006 Računskega sodišča o osnutku uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 UL C 273, 9.11.2006, str.
Notes that while 'tolerable risk of error' is, in an integrated internal control framework, a fundamental concept to be taken into consideration by the ECA when it issues its DAS, it should, according to ECA Opinion No 4/2006 on the draft Council regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 OJ C 273, 9.11.2006, p.
, treba le opredeliti na kakšen način se določi stopnjo dopustnega tveganja;
, be stipulated exactly how to determine tolerable risk of error;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije z dne 16. decembra 2008 o enotnemu razumevanju koncepta dopustnega tveganja napake kot trdno metodološko podlago za gospodarsko analizo stopnje sprejemljivega tveganja in pričakuje, da bo Komisija dokončala to delo pri pripravi predloga glede stopnje sprejemljivega tveganja v okviru proračunskega področja; s tem v zvezi priznava pomen tega sporočila kot prve podlage za razmislek, iz strogo gospodarskega stališča, glede stopnje sprejemljivega tveganja za dve področji porabe Unije, tj. za strukturne sklade in Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP); vendar zahteva, da je dialog med zunanjim revizorjem in revidirancem v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi revidiranja, v skladu s katerimi mora zunanji revizor oceniti tveganja, na osnovi katerih utemeljuje svojo izbiro revizijskih postopkov;
Welcomes the Commission communication of 16 December 2008 on a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error as a sound methodological basis for an economic analysis of acceptable level of risk, and expects the Commission to take this work further when preparing its proposal on tolerable level of risk by budgetary area; recognises, in this context, the importance of that communication as an initial basis for discussion, from a strictly economic perspective, on 'tolerable level of risk' for two Union spending areas, i.e. the Structural Funds and the EAFRD; calls, however, for this dialogue between external auditor and audited party to continue to comply with international auditing standards which stipulate that it is for the external auditor to decide which risks he should take as the basis for his judgment as to the choice of audit procedure;
obžaluje, da se Komisija v zgoraj omenjenem poročilu pritožuje zaradi težav, ki jih je imela pri pridobivanju dovolj zanesljivih informacij od držav članic, in meni, da ta ocena škodi podobi Unije;
Deplores the fact that, in the abovementioned communication, the Commission exposes the problems encountered in obtaining sufficiently reliable information from Member States, and regards this as detrimental to the Union's image;
dvomi v zanesljivost podatkov, ki jih zagotavljajo države članice, in zato zahteva, naj Komisija zbere nove številčne podatke in s tehnično podporo Računskega sodišča opravi njihovo poglobljeno analizo, ko bo zaznaven vpliv pravil za obdobje 2007 – 2013, in to analizo posreduje Parlamentu in Svetu do konca leta 2011;
Has doubts as to the reliability of data provided by Member States and therefore calls on the Commission to compile fresh statistics, plus an in-depth analysis thereof, once the impact of the 2007-2013 rules becomes clear and to forward that analysis to Parliament and the Council before the end of 2011;
meni, da je določitev ravni dopustnega tveganja zelo pomembna in izjemno zapletena; meni, da bi morala biti raven dopustnega tveganja tesno povezana s poglobljeno študijo o stroškovni učinkovitosti sistemov kontrole Komisije in držav članic za vsako področje porabe Skupnosti;
Considers that determining tolerable level of risk is most important and highly complex; takes the view that there should be a close tie-in between tolerable level of risk and an in-depth study into the cost-effectiveness of Commission and Member State control systems for each Community spending area;
poziva Komisijo glede na nujno potrebo po nadaljevanju analize stroškov in koristi kontrole, naj s tehnično podporo Računskega sodišča opravi poglobljeno analizo na področju raziskav, zunanjih odnosov in upravnih odhodkov, ter predloži poročilo o ugotovitvah do konca leta 2010;
Calls, given the pressing need to continue to analyse the costs and benefits of control, calls on the Commission, with the technical support of the ECA, to carry out an in-depth analysis in the areas of research, external relations and administrative expenditure, and to submit a report on the findings before the end of 2010;
meni, da bi bilo treba zneske iz evropskih sredstev, ki so se izgubila zaradi napak, ravno tako upoštevati pri določanju stopnje dopustnega tveganja;
Considers that the volume of Community funds lost because of errors should also be taken into consideration when a tolerable error rate is determined;
meni, da bi se morali oblikovati konkretni predlogi glede izboljšanja upravljanja in kontrole porabe Skupnosti, oziroma glede nekaterih vidikov za določeno usklajenost, in predlaga, da Parlament Komisiji med prihodnjim proračunskim postopkom dodeli sredstva, potrebna za izvedbo študije;
Takes the view that tangible proposals should be produced with regard to improving the management and control of Community spending and, indeed, for some aspects, a degree of harmonisation, and proposes that, during the forthcoming budgetary procedure, Parliament should give the Commission the resources needed to undertake a study;
zahteva, naj Komisija nemudoma predloži svoje predloge za doseganje cilja za pozitivno izjavo o zanesljivosti;
Calls on the Commission without delay to submit its proposals for achieving the objective of a positive DAS;
opozarja na odločitev Komisije, da se vzpostavi prostovoljni register lobistov in ovrednoti sistem po enem letu; pozna pravno podlago za obvezno registracijo, ki jo določa lizbonska pogodba; opozarja, da je obstoječi register Parlamenta obvezen, in da bi moral biti morebitni skupni register dejansko obvezen, saj je registracija v obeh primerih predpogoj za pridobitev dostopa do Parlamenta;
Recalls the Commission's decision to start with a voluntary register for lobbyists and to evaluate the system after one year; is aware of the legal basis for a mandatory register provided by the Treaty of Lisbon; recalls that Parliament's current register is already mandatory and that a possible common register would be de facto mandatory, since registering is, in either case, a prerequisite for gaining access to Parliament;
obžaluje, da svoja zahteva po novem kodeksu ravnanja za člane Komisije, da se izboljša skupna politična pristojnost in odgovornost za politične sklepe, pa tudi za izvajanje politike s strani njihovih služb, še ni bila upoštevana;
Deplores the fact that its call for a new code of conduct for Members of the Commission, so as to improve and define more clearly their individual and collective political responsibility and accountability for their decisions and for the implementation of their policies by their services, has not been followed up;
ponovno opozarja na odgovornost Komisije, da so podatki, ki jih posredujejo upravičenci do sredstev EU, popolni, z možnostjo iskanja in primerljivi, ter obžaluje, da ta cilj še ni bil dosežen;
Recalls once again the Commission's responsibility for ensuring the completeness, searchability and comparability of data provided on the beneficiaries of EU funding and regrets that this objective has still not been achieved;
ponovno opozarja na pomen popolne preglednosti in obveščanja glede osebja kabineta komisarjev, ki ni bilo zaposleno v skladu s kadrovskimi predpisi;
Recalls once again the importance of complete transparency and publicity with regard to the cabinet staff of Members of the Commission not recruited in accordance with the Staff Regulations;
ugotavlja, da je objava imen upravičencev do sredstev EU od proračunskega leta 2007 dalje obvezna; z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da Parlament nima celovitega vpogleda v objavljanje oziroma v podatke o upravičencih in njihove projekte; poziva Komisijo, da oceni koristnost podatkov, ki jih objavijo države članice glede naštetih političnih ciljev;
Notes that, since the financial year 2007, it has been compulsory to publish the names of recipients of European funds; notes with regret that Parliament has no overview either of publication or of the details of recipients and their projects; calls on the Commission to assess the usefulness of the information published by the Member States in the light of the policy objectives set forth;
; poziva Komisijo, naj vnese sredstva iz izvenproračunskega bančnega računa za nekdanji Economat v redni proračun pred pripravo predlogov za njegovo uporabo;
; calls on the Commission to enter the money from the ex-Economat off-budget bank accounts in the ordinary budget before making proposals for its use;
opozarja Komisijo na dejstvo, da mora biti celovita lahko dostopna podatkovna zbirka, ki bo vsebovala informacije o vseh končnih upravičencih sredstev EU, na voljo pred naslednjimi evropskimi volitvami;
Reminds the Commission of the fact that a comprehensive, easily accessible public database containing information on all final beneficiaries of EU funding should be available before the next European elections;
z zadovoljstvom opaža, da je poenostavitev, ki se je začela pri zadnji reviziji Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, pokazala zaželene učinke na področju javnih naročil;
Notes with satisfaction that the simplification begun when Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 was last revised has had the desired effects as regards public procurement;
vendar ugotavlja, da so ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti za donacije, pokazali le za delno učinkovite; zahteva, da Komisija do 1. januarja 2010 predstavi predlog revidirane in popolnoma konsolidirane finančne uredbe s posebnimi poglavji za individualne programe porabe sredstev, ki združujejo vse zahteve, ki jih mora upravičenec do programa izpolniti v enem samem celovitem viru in z nadaljnjimi poenostavitvami glede dodelitve in kontrole donacij; poziva v skladu s členom 184 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 k naslednji triletni reviziji Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002, ki se opravi z uporabo spravnega postopka;
Points out, however, that the measures taken on grants have demonstrated their effectiveness only in part; asks that the Commission present to it by 1 January 2010 proposals for a revised and fully consolidated Financial Regulation with chapters specific to individual expenditure programmes which bring together all the requirements which a beneficiary of a programme must fulfil in one single comprehensive source and with further simplifications as regards the award and control of grants; calls, pursuant to Article 184 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, for the next three-yearly review of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 to be carried out by means of the conciliation procedure;
poziva Komisijo, naj že zelo zgodaj opravi posvetovanje z drugimi institucijami, za katere velja Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002;
Invites the Commission to engage at a very early stage in consultations with the other institutions subject to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja delovne pogoje OLAF-a; zahteva, da Komisija OLAF-u zagotovi takojšnji dostop do svojih podatkovnih zbirk, če je to potrebno v povezavi s preiskavami, da se tako omogoči odprtje in takojšnje izvajanje preiskave;
Notes with concern OLAF's working conditions; calls on the Commission to give OLAF immediate access to its databases if this is necessary in connection with an investigation, so that investigations can be opened and conducted without delay;
ravno tako zahteva, da se zagotovi, da tretje države upravičenke ponudijo OLAF-u vso potrebno pomoč pri kontrolah in preverjanjih na kraju samem, kakor tudi vse ustrezne informacije o spremljanju izvedenih preiskav; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo vse prihodnje pogodbe določale, da morajo zadevni organi držav članic v celoti sodelovati z OLAF;
Calls also for action to ensure that beneficiary third countries give OLAF all necessary assistance during on-the-spot inspections and checks, together with all relevant information on follow-up to investigations carried out; asks the Commission to ensure that all future contracts stipulate that the authorities of the countries concerned must fully cooperate with OLAF;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da je le 6,7 % pravnih nadaljnjih priporočil OLAF sprožilo dejanske pravne postopke; se zaveda, da je 60 % vseh OLAF preiskav leta 2007 sprožilo pravna nadaljnja priporočila; meni, da je to stanje, ki ogroža pravno državo in zaupanje državljanov, in ga lahko koristijo le domnevni goljufi, nesprejemljivo; zato odločno poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi vsa pooblastila, ki so ji na voljo iz pogodb, da doseže učinkovito sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi v boju proti goljufijam v Skupnosti;
Is greatly concerned at the fact that only 6.7% of OLAF's "judicial follow-up" recommendations gave rise to actual judicial proceedings; is aware that in 2007 60% of all OLAF investigations gave rise to "judicial follow-up" recommendations; regards this state of affairs, which undermines the rule of law and citizens' confidence and from which only presumed fraudsters can benefit, as unacceptable; therefore strongly urges the Commission to use all the powers available to it under the Treaties to bring about effective cooperation among national authorities in the fight against Community fraud;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi mehanizem izmenjave informacij med OLAF in državami članicami o nadaljnjem ukrepanju po preiskavah Skupnosti za boj proti goljufijam; še zlasti poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo nacionalni sodni organi redno obveščeni s poročilom o napredku o rezultatih sodnih postopkov, ki so bili sprejeti v boju proti goljufijam v Skupnosti, po posredovanju dosjejev OLAF;
Calls once again on the Commission to establish a mechanism for exchanges of information between OLAF and the Member States concerning the follow-up to Community anti-fraud investigations; in particular, calls on the Commission to ensure that national judicial authorities keep OLAF regularly informed, by means of progress reports, on the outcome of the judicial action taken in the fight against Community fraud, following the forwarding of OLAF files;
opozarja na odstavek 93 svoje zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007 o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2005, v kateri poudarja, da bo razporeditev posredno merjenih storitev finančnega posredništva za namene lastnih sredstev iz naslova BND samodejno vključena v prihodnji sklep o lastnih sredstvih, saj Komisija v svojem predlogu sklepa Sveta o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0099 ) v zvezi s tem ni vključila nobenega pridržka;
Draws attention to paragraph 93 of its abovementioned resolution of 24 April 2007 on discharge in respect of the financial year 2005, in which it pointed out that allocated FISIMs will automatically be included in the own resource decision, for GNI own resource purposes, since, in its proposal for a Council decision on the system of the European Communities' own resources ( COM(2006)0099 ), the Commission entered no limiting reservation in that respect;
ugotavlja, da Svet ob sprejemu Sklepa 2007/436/ES, Euratom z dne 7. junija 2007 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti UL L 163, 23.6.2007, str.
Notes that the Council, when adopting Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources OJ L 163, 23.6.2007, p.
na osnovi predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0099 ) prav tako ni vključil nobenega pridržka glede FISIM; zato pričakuje, da se bodo podatki o BND, vključno s FISIM, z začetkom veljavnosti novega sklepa o lastnih sredstvih, in z uporabo za nazaj od 1. januarja 2007, uporabljali za izračun lastnih sredstev Skupnosti, ter se bodo na tej osnovi na novo izračunala pretekla in prihodnja plačila držav članic;
on the basis of the Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0099 ), likewise entered no limiting reservation concerning FISIM; expects, therefore, that when the new own resources decision comes into force, and backdated to 1 January 2007, GNI data including FISIMs will be used to calculate Community own resources and that, on that basis, past and future payments by the Member States will be calculated afresh;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče prišlo do zaključka, da na transakcije, povezane z odhodki, prijavljenimi za to skupino politik, kot celoto pomembno vpliva stopnja napak glede zakonitosti in/ali pravilnosti (točki 5.12 in 5.13 letnega poročila za 2007) in je seznanjen tudi s težavami, ki jih je Računsko sodišče odkrilo na ravni končnega upravičenca, in z dejstvom, da se je približno 20 % revidiranih plačil na tej ravni ponovno izkazalo za nepravilna; seznanjen pa je z manjšo pogostostjo napak ter z njihovim omejenim finančnim vplivom (0,83 % zadevnih odhodkov);
Notes with concern the ECA's conclusion that the transactions underlying this policy group, taken as a whole, are affected by a material level of error of legality and/or regularity (paragraphs 5.12 and 5.13 of the annual report for 2007), and also takes note of the problems found by the ECA at final-beneficiary level and of the fact that about 20% of payments audited at that level again turned out to be incorrect; notes, however, the decreasing frequency of errors and the limited financial impact of these errors (0.83% of the expenditure concerned);