natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker, čeprav se je z določbami Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 predvidelo njen pregled po treh letih veljavnosti in čeprav je Parlament Komisijo večkrat pozival k izboljšanju in okrepitvi preglednost EU zakonodaje, še vedno ni v pripravi predloga v pomenu člena 39(2) Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas, even though provision was made in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 for its revision after three years, and despite the fact that Parliament has asked the Commission on several occasions to improve and strengthen Community legislation on transparency, no proposal within the meaning of Rule 39(2) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure has been brought forward,
ker so v nekaterih pogledih težave pri uporabi Uredbe, ki se pojavijo z neustreznim izvajanjem; ker je sodna praksa Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zvezi z Uredbo prav tako pokazala, da je treba natančneje razviti in razjasniti nekatere določbe Uredbe, zlasti tiste o dokumentih, ki jih pripravijo države članice in tretje stranke, ter o izjemah zaradi preiskav, pravnega nasveta in "časa za premislek",
whereas the problems in applying the Regulation have in some respects arisen through inadequate implementation; whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice has also revealed the need to develop and clarify some of the provisions of the Regulation, particularly those concerning documents produced by the Member States and third parties, and the exceptions for investigations, legal advice and the 'time for reflection',
ker v primerjavi s tajnimi pogajanji v okviru Sveta pregledna in odprta pogajanja ter lojalno sodelovanje med institucijami predstavljajo boljši način zagotavljanja učinkovitosti postopka odločanja iz člena 207 Pogodbe ES; ker zato obžaluje, da se je Svet v zaključkih svojega predsedstva z dne 22. decembra 2005 odločil, da ne bo spremenil svojega Poslovnika, tako da bi v zakonodajnem postopku imel pregledne razprave na ministrski ravni,
whereas transparent and open negotiations and loyal cooperation between the institutions are better ways of ensuring the effectiveness of the decision-making process referred to in Article 207 EC than secret negotiations within the Council; whereas it therefore regrets that, in its Presidency Conclusions of 22 December 2005, the Council chose not to amend its Rules of Procedure so as to have transparent debates at ministerial level throughout the legislative procedure,
zahteva od Komisije, naj Parlamentu v letu 2006 na podlagi člena 255 Pogodbe ES predloži zakonodajni predlog o "pravici dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije ter o splošnih načelih in omejitvah na podlagi javnega ali zasebnega interesa, ki urejajo to pravico", ki bi moral biti pripravljen v medinstitucionalni razpravi in bi moral upoštevati podrobna priložena priporočila;
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament in 2006, on the basis of Article 255 EC, a legislative proposal on 'the right of access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, and general principles and limits on grounds of public or private interest governing this right of access', a proposal to be prepared in inter-institutional discussions and which should follow the detailed recommendations set out below;
potrjuje, da ta priporočila spoštujejo načelo subsidiarnosti, temeljne pravice državljanov, sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, zlasti v zvezi s členom 8 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah ter člena 7 in 8 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije;
Confirms that these recommendations respect the principle of subsidiarity, the fundamental rights of citizens, the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, particularly that on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
poudarja, da bi se morali novi predpisi o dostopu do dokumentov uporabljati od datuma začetka veljave potencialno spremenjene Uredbe in zato ne bi smela imeti povratne veljave;
Stresses that any new rules on access to documents should apply as from the date of the entry into force of the prospectively amended Regulation and should, therefore, have no retroactive effect;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in priložena podrobna priporočila posreduje Komisiji in Svetu ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic, držav pristopnic in kandidatk.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations to the Commission and the Council, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and accession and candidate countries.
Priporočilo 1 (o členu 255 Pogodbe ES in Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001 z ustavnega vidika)
Recommendation 1 (on Article 255 EC and Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 from a constitutional perspective)
Komisija bi morala izboljšati jasnost navedb sklicevanja in uvodnih izjav v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001, da bo razvidno, da člen 255 Pogodbe ES
The Commission should improve the clarity of the citations and recitals in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in order to make it quite clear that Article 255 EC
Člen 255 Pogodbe ES:
Article 255 EC:
, ki predstavlja pravno podlago Uredbi sami:
, which is the legal basis for the Regulation itself:
predstavlja glavno pravno podlago v pogodbah za izvajanje temeljnih načel Unije, opisanih v členu 1 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, po katerem "...se odločitve sprejemajo čimbolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljanom", ter v členu 6 iste pogodbe, po katerem "Unija temelji na načelih ...demokracije ...ter pravne države";
is the main legal basis in the Treaties for implementing the founding principles of the Union, outlined in Article 1 of the Treaty on the European Union, according to which '... decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen', and in Article 6 EU, according to which 'the Union is founded on the principles of ... democracy ... and the rule of law';
predstavlja osrednjo pravno podlago kar zadeva preglednost in zaupnost vseh dejavnosti Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije ("zakonodajnega trikotnika"), ko delujejo v skladu s Pogodbo ES in Pogodbo EU;
is the pivotal legal basis, as far as transparency and confidentiality are concerned, for all the activities of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission (the 'legislative triangle') when acting under the EC Treaty and the EU Treaty;
mora biti dosledno in popolnoma vključen v Poslovnike Evropskega parlamenta
must be sincerely and fully implemented in the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament
Člen 199 Pogodbe ES: Evropski parlament sprejme svoj Poslovnik z večino svojih članov.
Article 199 EC:
Postopki Evropskega parlamenta se objavijo na način, določen v njegovem Poslovniku.
The European Parliament shall adopt its Rules of Procedure, acting by a majority of its Members The proceedings of the European Parliament shall be published in the manner laid down in its Rules of Procedure..
Zagotovi objavo tega poslovnika..
It shall ensure that these Rules are published.
Svet sprejme svoj Poslovnik.
The Council shall adopt its Rules of Procedure.
Za namen uporabe člena 255(3) Svet v tem poslovniku opredeli pogoje, pod katerimi ima javnost dostop do dokumentov Sveta.
For the purpose of applying Article 255(3), the Council shall elaborate in these Rules the conditions under which the public shall have access to Council documents.
Za namen tega odstavka Svet določi primere, v katerih ga je treba obravnavati kakor zakonodajni organ, da bi bil v teh primerih omogočen boljši dostop do dokumentov in hkrati ohranjena učinkovitost njegovega postopka odločanja.
For the purpose of this paragraph, the Council shall define the cases in which it is to be regarded as acting in its legislative capacity, with a view to allowing greater access to documents in those cases, while at the same time preserving the effectiveness of its decision-making process.
V vsakem primeru, ko Svet odloča kot zakonodajni organ, se rezultati in razlage glasovanja ter izjave v zapisniku objavijo.
In any event, when the Council acts in its legislative capacity, the results of votes and explanations of vote as well as statements in the minutes shall be made public.
mora biti dosledno uporabljen, ko institucije delujejo kakor zakonodajno telo (kakor je opisano v členu 207 Pogodbe ES) ali izvajajo zakonodajo EU in ES (člen 202 Pogodbe ES)
must be applied consistently when the institutions act in a legislative capacity (as outlined in Article 207 EC) or implement EU or EC legislation (Article 202 EC)
– skrbi za usklajevanje splošnih ekonomskih politik držav članic;
- ensure coordination of the general economic policies of the Member States,
– ima pristojnost odločanja;
- have power to take decisions,
– v pravnih aktih, ki jih sprejema, prenese pristojnost za izvajanje svojih predpisov na Komisijo.
- confer on the Commission, in the acts which the Council adopts, powers for the implementation of the rules which the Council lays down.
Zgoraj navedeni postopki morajo biti skladni z načeli in pravili, ki jih je Svet predhodno soglasno sprejel na predlog Komisije in po pridobitvi mnenja Evropskega parlamenta.
The procedures referred to above must be consonant with principles and rules to be laid down in advance by the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after obtaining the opinion of the European Parliament.
, ne glede na to katera institucija pooblašča ali izvaja EU ali ES pravila.
, irrespective of which institution implements the legislation or exercises implementing powers.
Priporočilo 2 (o pojmih zakonodajni in nezakonodajni dokumenti)
Recommendation 2 (on the concepts of legislative and non-legislative documents)
Po razpravi v medinstitucionalnem odboru, ustanovljenem na podlagi člena 15 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 in v skladu z načeli, orisanimi v Priporočilu 1, naj Komisija spremeni Uredbo:
The Commission, following discussion in the inter-institutional committee provided for in Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and in compliance with the principles outlined in Recommendation 1, should amend the Regulation:
ponovno naj opredeli
by re-defining
pojem "zakonodajni dokumenti
the concept of 'legislative documents'
", ki so trenutno določeni v členu 12(2) kakor dokumenti, ki so "...pripravljeni ali prejeti med postopki za sprejmanje aktov, ki so pravno zavezujoči v državah članicah ali zanje", z navedbo, da bi moral biti pojem (zakonodajnega) akta rezerviran le za sekundarno pravo (z neposredno pravno podlago v Pogodbah);
, currently defined in Article 12(2), as documents '...drawn up or received in the course of procedures for the adoption of acts that are legally binding in or on the Member States', by adding a reference to the fact that the concept of (legislative) act should be reserved for secondary law only (with a direct legal basis in the Treaties);
za zakonodajne dokumente bi dostop moral biti zagotovljen:
As far as legislative documents are concerned, access should be granted:
do vseh pripravljalnih dokumentov, povezanih z opredeljenimi postopki odločanja; dostop bi moral biti odobren takoj, ko so v procesu odločanja udeležene institucije formalno oddale dokumente;
to all preparatory documents connected with an identified decisional procedure; access should be granted as soon as those documents are formally submitted by each institution taking part in the decision;
do zapisa razprav Parlamenta ali Sveta, kadar ti dve instituciji delujeta kot zakonodajni telesi ter do obravnavanih dokumentov (če le-ti niso zaupni, glej Priporočilo 3);
to the record of Parliament or Council debates, where those institutions are acting in a legislative capacity, and to the documents discussed (if not classified, see Recommendation 3 below);
do imen avtorjev vsake pobude ali uradnega predloga spremembe;
to the identity of the author of each initiative or formal amendment;
do ustreznih dodatnih informacij ali dokumentov, povezanih z zasedanji delovnih skupin institucij, in do dokumentov, predloženih s strani sekretariatov institucij (vključno s pravnimi službami), ko le-ti niso le upravne narave.
to relevant complementary information or documents relating to the meetings of the institutions' working groups, and to the contributions submitted by the secretariats of the institutions (including the legal services), where such documents are not simply administrative in nature.
Spremenjena uredba naj bo zakonodajna podlaga za oblikovanje predpisov, dobre prakse in medinstitucionalnih sporazumov, namenjenih izboljšanju priprave zakonodajnih besedil in zagotavljanju dostopa do končnih oblik zakonodajnih besedil, kakor predpisi, ki veljajo za:
The amended Regulation should also be the legal basis for establishing rules, good practice and inter-institutional agreements designed to improve the drafting of legislative texts and to ensure that final legislative texts are accessible, such as the rules to be followed for:
pripravljanje osnutkov zakonodajnih aktov,
drafting legislative acts,
njihovo objavo v elektronski obliki v Uradnem listu,
publishing them in electronic form in the Official Journal,
združevanje osnovnih besedil in njihovih aktov o spremembah, in
consolidating basic texts with their amending acts, and
določanje formata Uradnega lista, izvajanje večjezičnosti in opredeljevanje nalog Urada za uradne publikacije Evropskih skupnosti;
determining the format of the Official Journal, implementing multilingualism and defining the tasks of OPOCE;
opredeli naj
by defining
"nezakonodajne dokumente"
the concept of 'non-legislative documents'
kakor dokumente, povezane s postopki za izvajanje zakonodajnih aktov (ne glede na to, katera institucija je vpletena) in dokumente, povezane s postopki sprejemanja nezavezujočih aktov; glede na njihov upravni značaj, bi moralo biti mogoče zanje uveljaviti manj stroge predpise o preglednosti;
as documents connected with procedures for implementing legislative acts (whichever institutions are involved) and documents connected with procedures for adopting non-binding acts; it should be possible to apply less stringent transparency rules to such documents, given their administrative nature;
omogočiti javnost postopkov, ki se jih spoštuje za nezakonodajne dokumente, in jasno opredeliti, kdaj in kako lahko zainteresirani sodelujejo v zadevnem postopku ter kdaj in kako lahko javnost dostopa do dokumentov;
should make public the procedure to be followed for non-legislative documents and lay down clearly when and how interested parties may take part in the procedure concerned and when and how the public may have access to the documents;
tudi jasno navesti organizacijske enote, ki so vključene v upravne postopke, načine shranjevanja dokumentov, tako začasno kakor trajno, in kako do njih dostopati.
should also clearly indicate the organisational units involved in administrative procedures, the way in which documents are stored, both temporarily and permanently, and how they can be accessed.
opredli naj
by defining
"regulativne dokumente"
the concept of 'regulatory documents'
ukrepe splošnega dosega za izvajanje bistvenih določb temeljnih aktov, vključno z ukrepi za zaščito zdravja ali varnosti ljudi, živali ali rastlin, je treba sprejeti po regulativnem postopku; kadar temeljni akt predvideva prilagoditev ali dopolnitev nekaterih nebistvenih določb akta z izvedbenimi postopki, je treba takšne ukrepe sprejeti po regulativnem postopku".
'measures of general scope designed to apply essential provisions of basic instruments, including measures concerning the protection of the health or safety of humans, animals or plants, should be adopted by use of the regulatory procedure; where a basic instrument stipulates that certain non-essential provisions of the instrument may be adapted or updated by way of implementing procedures, such measures should be adopted by use of the regulatory procedure'.
kakor dokumente, povezane s postopki za sprejemanje aktov, ki dopolnjujejo ali s katerimi se spreminjajo neključne določbe zakonodajnih aktov (kakor je opredeljeno v točki (a)), ne glede na to, ali te regulativne dokumente sprejme Svet ali je pristojnost za to predana Komisiji; taki dokumenti bi morali biti dostopni smiselno pod enakimi pogoji, kakor veljajo za zakonodajne dokumente (na primer v postopkih komitologije se dostop omogoči takoj, ko je osnutek ukrepa formalno posredovan odboru); podobno naj se dostop omogoči tudi do ustreznih dopolnilnih dokumentov (kakor so na primer dnevni redi, zapisniki, rezultati glasovanj odborov).
as documents connected with procedures for adopting acts which complete or amend non-essential elements of legislative acts (as defined in point (a)) regardless of whether such regulatory documents are adopted by the Council or delegated to the Commission; such documents should be accessible 'mutatis mutandis' under the same conditions as those applicable to legislative documents (e.g., in comitology procedures, access should be granted as soon as a draft measure is formally submitted to a committee); similarly, access should also be granted to the relevant complementary documents (e.g. the agendas, minutes and result of votes of the committee).
Ob upoštevanju najboljše prakse v državah članica bi morala biti spremenjena tudi Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 in sicer tako, da se jasno opredeli "... omejitve iz razlogov javnega ali zasebnega interesa", kakor jo navaja člen 255 Pogodbe ES, zaradi katerega bi bil lahko odložen ali preprečen dostop do dokumentov institucij (ali njihovih ustreznih delov); Uredba bi zatorej morala:
Taking into account best practice in the Member States, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should also be amended in such a way as to clearly define the '... limits on grounds of public or private interest', as referred to in Article 255 EC, which could delay or prevent access to the institutions' documents (or relevant parts of them); the Regulation should therefore contain rules for:
zagotoviti, da se, ne glede na področje dejavnosti EU, podlage, na katerih se sprejemajo sklepi o temeljni politiki in zakonodaja, sprejemajo javno; pojasniti je treba tudi razlike med potrebo po zaupnosti, denimo v primeru načrtovanega tekočega delovanja varnostnih služb, na eni strani ter zahtevami po odgovornosti in naknadnem nadzoru na drugi strani,
ensuring that, regardless of the field of EU action, the grounds on which basic policy decisions are taken and on which legislation is adopted are in the public domain; there is also a need for clarification of the distinction between, on the one hand, the need for confidentiality as regards, for instance, planned or on-going operations by security services and, on the other hand, the requirements of accountability and a posteriori control,
zagotoviti, da se dokumentov ne bo označevalo kakor zaupne povsem rutinsko, samo zato ker se nanašajo na vprašanje, ki je ali bi lahko bilo pomembno iz zornega kota varnosti, in
ensuring that documents are not classified as confidential as a matter of routine, simply because they refer to a issue which is or might be of concern from a security point of view, and
zagotoviti primeren nadzor s strani Evropskega parlamenta (demokratičen parlamentarni nadzor).
ensuring adequate control by the European Parliament (democratic parliamentary scrutiny).
Priporočilo 4 (o odnosu med EU in državami članicami glede izmenjave informacij/dokumentov)
Recommendation 4 (on the relationship between the EU and Member States as regards sharing information/documents)
Ob upoštevanju načela, določenega v členu 296 Pogodbe ES, po katerem "nobena država članica ne sme biti prisiljena posredovati informacije, katerih razkritje bi bilo v nasprotju s ključnimi interesi njene varnosti", bi bilo treba Uredbo spremeniti tako, da:
Taking into account the principle outlined in Article 296 EC according to which 'no Member State shall be obliged to supply information the disclosure of which it considers contrary to the essential interests of its security', the Regulation should be amended in such a way as to:
omeji pravico držav članic do omejevanja dostopa do njihovih prispevkov/sprememb v zakonodajnih/regulativnih postopkih;
limit the right of Member States to limit access to their contributions/amendments in legislative/regulatory procedures;
omogoči popoln dostop do informacij, posredovanih Komisiji, ko le-ta izvaja ES ali EU zakonodajo, do takrat, dokler se ne sproži postopka pred Sodiščem.
give full access to information submitted to the Commission when dealing with the implementation of EC or EU legislation until such time as any proceedings before a court have begun.
Ob upoštevanju izkušnje iz prvega štiriletnega obdobja veljavnosti Uredbe, bi morala Komisija spremeniti Uredbo z jasnim predlogom, s katerim bi:
Taking into account the experience of the first four-year period of the Regulation's being in force, the Commission should amend the Regulation by making a coherent proposal for:
dostop do dokumentov, ki vključujejo zakonodajne ali regulativne postopke, zagotovila z ene same točke po jasni in strukturirani poti (glej Priporočilo 2);
ensuring a single point of access in a clear and structured way to all preparatory documents dealing with a legislative or regulatory procedure (see Recommendation 2);
prestrukturirala registre institucij z uporabo skupnega vmesnika, tako da so vsi trije registri za državljana/uporabnika enako funkcionalni;
reorganising the institutions' registers by adding a common interface so that the citizen/user is able to find the same functionalities in the three registers;
opredelila skupna pravila za arhiviranje dokumentov brez podvojevanja ter zagotovila verodostojnost različnih verzij;
defining common rules for archiving documents, avoiding duplication and ensuring the authenticity of the various versions;
na jasen in razumljiv način predstavila potek dela v institucijah in, kjer je to potrebno, točko dostopa do dokumentov.
presenting in a clear and comprehensible way the work-flow of the Institutions and, where relevant, the point of access to the documents.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o oceni pogajalskega kroga iz Dohe po ministrski konferenci Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hongkongu ( 2005/2247(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong ( 2005/2247(INI) )
ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije šeste ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO), sprejete dne 18. decembra 2005 Dokument številka 05-6248, oznaka dokumenta WT/MIN(05)/DEC.
having regard to the Ministerial Declaration of the Sixth Session of the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO), adopted on 18 December 2005 Document number 05-6248, document symbol WT/MIN(05)/DEC)
ob upoštevanju sklepnih deklaracij parlamentarne konference STO ob zaključku zasedanj v Hongkongu od 12. do 15. decembra 2005 in v Bruslju od 24. do 26. novembra 2004,
having regard to the Final Declarations by the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO at the conclusion of its sessions in Hong Kong from 12 to 15 December 2005 and in Brussels from 25 to 26 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o razvojni agendi STO iz Dohe po izredni seji Sveta za zunanje zadeve v Luksemburgu dne 18. oktobra 2005 (13378/05),
having regard to the Council conclusions on the WTO Doha Development Agenda (DDA), following the extraordinary General Affairs and External Relations Council meeting in Luxembourg on 18 October 2005 (13378/05),
ob upoštevanju sklepa generalnega sveta STO z dne 1. avgusta 2004 Dokument št. 04-3297, oznaka dokumenta WT/L/579.
having regard to the WTO General Council Decision of 1 August 2004 Document number 04-3297, document symbol WT/L/579)
ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije STO iz Dohe z dne 14. novembra 2001 Dokument št. 01-5859, oznaka dokumenta WT/MIN/(01)/DEC/1.
having regard to the Doha Ministerial Declaration of the WTO of 14 November 2001 Document number 01-5859, document symbol WT/MIN(01)/DEC/1)
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij z dne 15. decembra 1999 o tretji ministrski konferenci STO v Seattlu UL C 296, 18.10.2000, str.
having regard to its previous resolutions of 15 December 1999 on the Third WTO Ministerial Conference in Seattle OJ C 296, 18.10.2000, p.
, z dne 13. decembra 2001 o zasedanju STO v Katarju UL C 177 E, 25.7.2002, str.
, of 13 December 2001 on the WTO meeting in Qatar OJ C 177 E, 25.7.2002, p.