natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker je bil napredek pri zmanjševanju odpadkov in recikliranju gospodinjskih odpadkov minimalen in ker se gospodinjski in drugi odpadki še vedno brez razlike odlagajo na odlagališčih, včasih pa so celo očitno pomešani z različnimi vrstami industrijskih odpadkov,
G. whereas the progress made in terms of waste reduction and the recycling of household waste has been minimal and household and other waste has continued to be brought to landfills indiscriminately, in some cases apparently mixed with various types of industrial waste,
H. ker so bila mnoga odlagališča razglašena za področja strateškega pomena, zaradi česar javnost, župan in lokalni organi, vključno s policijo, niso mogli preverjati, kaj se na njih dejansko odlaga;
H. whereas many landfills have been declared areas of strategic interest, so that members of the public, mayors and local authorities, including the police, have been prevented from checking what is actually brought there,
I. ker je glavna značilnost upravljanja krize z odpadki ta, da so dovoljena odstopanja od predpisov in nadzora, tudi na primer od ocene vplivov na okolje in zakonodaje o javnih naročilih; ker so bili imenovani komisarji, ki so bili pooblaščeni za odločanje o lokaciji obratov, odlagališč in sežigalnic, ter izbiro izvajalcev, ne da bi se morali o svojih odločitvah posvetovati z lokalnimi oblastmi in prebivalci ali jih obveščati; ker se sam sistem ravnanja z odpadki prek komisarjev spopada z ostrimi kritikami, ker na to temo potekajo številne sodne preiskave, in ker velik del prebivalstva ravnanje z odpadki prek komisarjev dejansko vidi kot del problema in ne del rešitve,
I. whereas the key feature of the management of the waste crisis is the practice of derogating from regulations and controls, including, for example, the granting of exemptions from environmental impact assessments and public procurement legislation; whereas commissioners were appointed with the authority to decide on the location of plants, landfills and incinerators and to select contractors, without proper consultation of or the provision of information to local authorities and local residents about the decisions taken; and whereas the system involving the management of waste by emergency commissioners has come under heavy criticism and given rise to judicial proceedings and is actually seen by much of the population as part of the problem, owing to its lack of transparency and the lack of institutional supervision, rather than the solution,
J. ker imajo po Aarhuški konvenciji državljani pravico do obveščenosti o razmerah na njihovem ozemlju in ker je dolžnost oblasti, da zagotovijo informacije in državljane spodbujajo, naj razvijejo odgovoren odnos in oblike vedenja; ker morajo države članice v skladu z Direktivo 2003/35/ES javnosti zagotoviti, da lahko že od začetka in učinkovito sodelujejo pri pripravi, spremembi ali reviziji načrtov ali programov, ki jih je treba oblikovati,
J. whereas under the Aarhus Convention citizens have the right to be informed of the situation in their own territory and it is the duty of the authorities to provide information and to motivate citizens to develop a responsible attitude and forms of behaviour; whereas in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC Member States are required to ensure that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation and modification or review of any plans or programmes which have to be drawn up,
K. ker javnosti, ki je protestirala proti razmeram ali poskušala predlagati alternativne pristope, ni bila posvečena ustrezna pozornost; ker so nacionalne politične oblasti na odlagališčih in sežigalnici v Acerri uvedle strog vojaški nadzor; ker v zadnjem času med demonstracijami zaradi problematike odpadkov prihaja tudi do aretacij, kar kaže na to, da so odnosi med državljani in oblastmi načeti ter da se nezadovoljstvo ljudi sčasoma povečuje,
K. whereas no proper attention was paid to members of the public who protested at the situation or tried to propose alternative approaches; whereas the national political authorities have placed waste sites and the Acerra incinerator under strict army control; whereas recently there have been some arrests during public demonstrations about the matter, showing that the relationship between the public and the authorities has been damaged as civil discontent increases over time,
L. ker je Komisija leta 2007 sklenila, da bo vse dokler se ne odpravi sistem komisarjev ustavila plačilo 135 milijonov EUR iz prispevkov za projekte, povezane z odpadki, predvidenih za finančno obdobje 2006–2013, ter nadaljnjih 10,5 milijonov EUR za finančno obdobje 2000–2006,
L. whereas in 2007 the Commission decided to suspend payment of €135 million in contributions from the 2006-2013 financing period to waste-related projects and a further €10.5 million from the 2000-2006 financing period until the commissioner structure is abolished,
M. ker je bil v večini mest napredek pri zmanjševanju odpadkov in recikliranju gospodinjskih odpadkov minimalen, ker je presenetljivo, da je bil kljub temu v nekaterih mestih dosežen bistven napredek pri ločevanju in zbiranju gospodinjskih odpadkov, čeprav se veriga upravljanja z odpadki še vedno močno opira na odlagališča in sežiganje odpadkov, kar je v nasprotju s smernicami nove okvirne direktive o odpadkih (2008/98/ES); ker se trenutno ocenjuje skladnost načrta ravnanja z odpadki z načeli iz zakonodaje EU o odpadkih glede hierarhije upravljanja z odpadki ter varne uporabe odlagališč ali sežigalnic,
M. whereas in most cities progress in terms of waste reduction and the recycling of household waste has been minimal; whereas, remarkably, significant progress has been made in some cities in the separation and collection of household waste, although the waste cycle still relies heavily on landfill and incineration, contrary to the guidelines laid down in the new Waste Framework Directive (2008/98/EC); whereas a waste management plan is currently being assessed in terms of its compliance with the principles laid down in EU waste legislation regarding the hierarchy of treatment and the safe use of landfills or incineration,
N. ker se kakovost gospodinjskih odpadkov in odlaganje strupenih odpadkov na nezakonitih odlagališčih ne preverjata ter ker je zaradi dejstva, da pri odločanju o lokaciji odlagališč v mestih, kot je Chiaiano, niso bili ustrezno upoštevani geološki in hidrološki dejavniki, prišlo do visokega tveganja onesnaženosti površinskih ali podtalnih vodnih virov v okolici; ker je to v nasprotju s členoma 17 in 18 Okvirne direktive o odpadkih in določbami direktive o odlagališčih,
N. whereas no checks are carried out on the quality of household waste and the dumping of hazardous waste in illegal sites, and whereas the fact that geological and hydrological factors have not been taken properly into account in decisions on the location of landfills at sites such as Chiaiano has given rise to serious risks of the contamination of surrounding soil and groundwater; whereas this is in violation of Articles 17 and 18 of the Waste Framework Directive, and of the Landfill Directive,
O. ker je Sodišče v svoji sodbi z dne 26. aprila 2007 v zadevi C-135/05 izjavilo, da Italijanska republika ni izpolnila obveznosti iz prava Skupnosti, saj ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev zlasti zbiranja in predelave odpadkov brez ogrožanja zdravja ljudi ter uporabe postopkov ali metod, ki bi lahko škodovali okolju, ter ni prepovedala zapuščanja, odlaganja ali nenadzorovanega odstranjevanja odpadkov; ker je Sodišče v svoji nedavni sodbi z dne 4. marca 2010 v primeru C-297/08 izjavilo, da Italijanska republika s tem, ko ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za regijo Kampanija, ni izpolnila obveznosti iz členov 4 in 5 Direktive 2006/12/ES,
O. whereas in its judgment of 26 April 2007 in Case C-135/05 the Court of Justice declared that, firstly, by not adopting all the necessary measures to ensure, in particular, that waste is recovered or disposed of without endangering human health and without using processes or methods which could harm the environment, and, secondly, by not prohibiting the abandonment, dumping or uncontrolled disposal of waste, the Italian Republic had failed to fulfil its obligations under Community law; whereas in its recent judgment of 4 March 2010 in Case C-297/08 the Court declared that, by not adopting all the necessary measures for the region of Campania, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 2006/12/EC,
P. ker Komisija ni prejela končne različice načrta ravnanja z odpadki za deželo Kampanija , ki bi bila skladna s sodbo Sodišča Evropskih unije; ker je Parlament ugotovil, da je bil po izteku roka 31. decembra 2010 predložen osnutek načrta ravnanja z odpadki,
P. whereas the Commission has not received a final version of the waste management plan for the Region of Campania, in keeping with the Court of Justice ruling; whereas Parliament has, however, noted a draft waste management plan presented after the 31 December 2010 deadline,
1. poziva, naj se čim prej opredeli trajnostna rešitev, ki bo izpolnjevala merila EU, zlasti glede izvajanja načrta ravnanja z odpadki, ki mora po direktivi 2008/98/ES temeljiti na spoštovanju hierarhije verige ravnanja z odpadki; poziva Komisijo, naj ga obvešča o razvoju dogodkov, vključno z izvajanjem načrta ravnanja z odpadki, in skladnostjo s sodbo Sodišča Evropske unije z dne 4. marca 2010 ter s predpisi EU;
Calls for a sustainable solution to be urgently identified that meets EU criteria, namely the implementation of a waste management plan under which, in accordance with Directive 2008/98/EC, respect for the waste cycle hierarchy is fundamental; asks the Commission to keep it informed about developments, including the implementation of a waste management plan, and compliance with the Court of Justice ruling of 4 March 2010 and EU rules;
5. ponovno poudarja, da je Komisija trenutno blokirala sredstva iz strukturnih skladov EU, namenjenih Kampaniji, ki bodo sproščena šele takrat, ko bo načrt ravnanja z odpadki dejansko v skladu s pravom EU;
Reiterates the fact that the Commission is currently withholding EU structural funds intended for Campania, funds that will be released only once the waste management plan is actually consistent with EU law;
13. ugotavlja, da Italija do določenega roka, tj. do 26. decembra 2010, ni podala uradnega obvestila o prenosu Direktive 2008/99/ES o zaščiti okolja s kazenskim pravom, vendar pričakuje, da bo v celoti spoštovala direktivo ter da bo, če bo potrebno, tudi pravnim osebam naložila kazni v skladu s prekrški pri ravnanju z odpadki, opredeljenimi v direktivi;
Notes that Italy did not notify its transposition of Directive 2008/99/EC on the protection of the environment through criminal law by the deadline of 26 December 2010, but expects Italy to comply fully with the directive and to impose penalties accordingly for the waste-related offences listed in the directive, including on legal persons when the relevant conditions are met;
28.1.2011 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 115(5) poslovnika,
31.1.2011 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 115(5) of the Rules of Procedure
PE455.903v01-00 } PE445.905v01-00 } PE455.918v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Pobudi za cepljenje proti tuberkulozi, konkretnem prispevku strategije 2020 za dosego 6. razvojnega cilja tisočletja in odpravo tuberkuloze do leta 2050
PE455.903v01-00 } PE455.905v01-00 } PE455.918v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (TBVI) – practical implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy with a view to meeting MDG 6 and eliminating tuberculosis by 2050
– ob upoštevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja Organizacije združenih narodov, da se do leta 2015 ustavi naraščanje in obrne trend obolevnosti za tuberkulozo,
– having regard to the United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which provide for halting the increase in the incidence of tuberculosis by 2015 and reversing the trend,
– ob upoštevanju lizbonske strategije za oblikovanje evropskega območja za raziskave in inovacije, Evrope inovacij EU 2020, in vodilne pobude iz strategije Evropa 2020 – Unija inovacij,
– having regard to the Lisbon Strategy, which seeks to establish a European research and innovation area, the Europe of Innovation initiative and the Europe 2020 strategy flagship initiative on an Innovation Union,
– ob upoštevanju programa za preprečevanje tuberkuloze Mednarodne zdravstvene organizacije, ki si je zastavila cilj, da do leta 2015 za 50 % zmanjša prevalenco in umrljivost v primerjavi z letom 1990 ter da do leta 2050 odpravi tuberkulozo,
– having regard to the Stop Tuberculosis programme, under the aegis of the WHO, which has set itself the goal of a 50% reduction in the tuberculosis prevalence and mortality rates, from a 1990 baseline, by 2015 and eliminating the disease by 2050,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije z naslovom „Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response“ (WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3) o zaskrbljujočem pojavu sevov, odpornih in zelo odpornih na zdravljenje,
– having regard to the WHO report (WHO/HTM/TB/2010.3) entitled ‘Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response’, on the worrying emergence of strains of tuberculosis resistant or highly resistant to treatment,
– ob upoštevanju berlinske izjave o tuberkulozi na evropskem ministrskem forumu Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije (The Berlin Declaration on Tuberculosis – All Against Tuberculosis, EUR/07/5061622/5, WHO European Ministerial Forum, 74415) z dne 22. oktobra 2007,
– having regard to the Berlin Declaration on Tuberculosis at the WHO European Ministerial Forum of 22 October 2007, entitled ‘All Against Tuberculosis’ (EUR/07/5061622/5, 74415),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Svetovalnega odbora za znanost evropskih akademij (EASAC), ki navaja, da samo stroški zdravljenja tuberkuloze v Evropski uniji znašajo 2 milijardi EUR letno (EASAC Policy report 10, marec 2009, ISBN: 9789-0-85403-746-9),
– having regard to the report of the European Academies’ Science Advisory Council, which found that the cost of tuberculosis treatment alone in the EU was EUR 2 billion a year (EASAC Policy Report 10, March 2009, ISBN: 9789-0-85403-746-9),
A. ker je dostop do zdravniške oskrbe priznan v splošni deklaraciji človekovih pravic in ker morajo vlade izpolniti svojo obveznost ter vsemu prebivalstvu zagotoviti storitve javnega zdravstva,
A. whereas access to health care is a right recognised in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and governments must meet their obligation to provide public health services to their entire population,
B. ker se zdravila ne morejo v celoti enačiti s tržnimi proizvodi,
B. whereas medicines cannot be treated as purely commercial products,
C. ker je incidenca tuberkuloze po svetu štiri leta pred rokom za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja kljub doseženemu napredku še vedno zaskrbljujoča,
C. whereas, with four years to go until the MDG deadline, the incidence of tuberculosis around the world remains a cause for concern, despite the progress made,
D. ker je tuberkuloza še vedno med glavnimi vzroki smrti po svetu, saj za njo vsako leto umre okrog dva milijona ljudi,
D. whereas tuberculosis remains one of the main causes of death in the world, with nearly 2 million people dying as a result of the disease every year,
E. ker razvojni cilji tisočletja vključujejo tudi zmanjšanje umrljivosti otrok in izboljšanje zdravja mater,
E. whereas the MDGs also include reducing infant mortality and improving maternal health,
F. ker Pobuda za cepljenje proti tuberkulozi, namenjena ljudem s tuberkulozo po svetu, zlasti v najmanj razvitih državah, lahko postane konkreten prispevek strategije 2020 ter bo lahko okrepila strateško samostojnost EU v boju proti tuberkulozi in drugim nalezljivim boleznim,
F. whereas the TBVI, applied in the interests of tuberculosis sufferers worldwide – and particularly in the least advanced countries – should become part of the practical implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy, thereby enhancing the EU’s strategic independence in the fight against tuberculosis and other contagious diseases,
G. ker kljub proračunskim omejitvam vztrajamo pri cilju, da se v raziskave in razvoj vložijo 3 % BDP ( KOM(2010)2020 in KOM(2010)0546 ),
G. whereas the objective is still to invest 3% of GDP in research and development in spite of budgetary constraints ( COM(2010)2020 and COM(2010)0546 ),
H. ker zaradi tropskih boleznih, kot so malarija, tuberkuloza in spalna bolezen, vsako leto umrejo milijoni ljudi, saj so te bolezni postale bolj odporne (epidemija, odporna na več zdravil, ali izredno odporna epidemija je velik problem) ali zdravil zanje ni, ker so bile raziskave opuščene le zaradi tržne rentabilnosti,
H. whereas tropical diseases such as malaria, tuberculosis and sleeping sickness kill millions of people each year, owing in particular to growing resistance to treatments, or in some cases to an absence of treatments as the result of research being discontinued for purely commercial reasons,
I. ker je tuberkuloza v oči bijoč primer neenakosti med narodi, saj je bila v industrijsko razvitih državah skoraj odpravljena,
I. whereas tuberculosis is a striking example of inequality between peoples – having been all but eradicated in industrialised countries,
J. ker je tuberkuloza ob sočasni okužbi z virusom HIV/aidsom zelo huda bolezen,
J. whereas tuberculosis is one of the major diseases involved in cases of co-infection with HIV/Aids,
K. ker se najbolj zapostavljene bolezni, ki prizadenejo samo države v razvoju, trenutno ne raziskujejo dovolj,
K. whereas insufficient research is currently being conducted into the most neglected diseases, which affect only people in developing countries,
L. ker uspeh vertikalnih skladov, namenjenih posameznim boleznim, na primer aidsu, malariji ali tuberkulozi, ne sme voditi v odvzem sredstev osnovni zdravstveni (tako imenovani horizontalni) infrastrukturi,
L. whereas the success of ‘vertical’ funds to tackle specific diseases such as Aids, malaria and tuberculosis must not mean a siphoning-off of resources from so-called ‘horizontal’ basic health care infrastructure,
M. ker zdravstvene storitve v večini držav v razvoju ne zadovoljujejo potreb prebivalstva in ker so programi za strukturno prilagajanje iz devetdesetih let prispevali k poslabšanju razmer, saj je zaradi njih prišlo do krčenja proračunskih sredstev v socialnem sektorju,
M. whereas the health services in most developing countries are far from able to meet the needs of local populations, and whereas structural adjustment programmes in the 1990s made the situation worse by giving rise to drastic cuts in social services budgets,
1. poudarja, da lahko samo obsežen program cepljenja pozitivno učinkuje na uresničitev 6. razvojnega cilja tisočletja po letu 2015 ter zlasti na odpravo tuberkuloze do leta 2050;
Underlines the fact that only a vaccination programme involving a large-scale vaccination campaign could have a positive impact in terms of achieving MDG 6 after 2015, and in particular the eradication of tuberculosis by 2050;
31.1.2011 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 110(4) poslovnika,
31.1.2011 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 110(4) of the Rules of Procedure
PE455.907v01-00 } PE455.908v01-00 } PE455.909v01-00 } PE455.910v01-00 } PE455.916v01-00 } PE455.917v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Tuniziji
PE455.907v01-00 } PE455.908v01-00 } PE455.909v01-00 } PE455.910v01-00 } PE455.916v01-00 } PE455.917v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Tunisia
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o človekovih pravicah v Tuniziji, zlasti resolucij z dne 29. septembra 2005, 15. decembra 2005 in 15. junija 2005,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the human rights situation in Tunisia, particularly those of 29 September 2005, 15 December 2005 and 15 June 2005,
– ob upoštevanju evro-sredozemskega sporazuma o pridružitvi, podpisanega v marcu 1998 med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami ter Republiko Tunizijo,
– having regard to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement of March 1998 establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Tunisia, of the other part,
– ob upoštevanju politike Unije o človekovih pravicah in demokratizaciji v tretjih državah, ki jo je v decembru 2005 sprejel Svet,
– having regard to Union policy on human rights and democratisation in third countries, as adopted by the Council in December 2005,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 4. decembra 2006 o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike ( KOM(2006)0726 ),
– having regard to the Commission's Communication of 4 December 2006 on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy ( COM(2006)0726 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o pregledu evropske sosedske politike v letu 2009, poročilo o spremljanju Tunizije ( KOM(2006)0726 ) - SEC(2010)513),
– having regard to the Commission Communication entitled ‘Implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy in 2009: progress report on Tunisia’ ( COM(2010)0207 - SEC(2010)0513 ),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta med Evropsko unijo in Tunizijo,
– having regard to the European Union-Tunisia Action Plan,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o politiki EU za zaščito zagovornikov človekovih pravic, ki je bilo sprejeto 14. maja 2010,
– having regard to its Report on EU policies in favour of human rights defenders, adopted on 14 May 2010,
– ob upoštevanju izjave Evropske unije ob koncu osmega srečanja pridružitvenega sveta EU-Tunizija, ki je potekal 11. maja 2010,
– having regard to the European Union statement issued following the Eighth Meeting of the EU-Tunisia Association Council of 11 May 2010,
– ob upoštevanju izjav visoke predstavnice Unije Catherine Asthon in evropskega komisarja Stefana Füleja z dne 13. januarja in 17. januarja 2011 o razmerah v Tuniziji,
– having regard to the statements made by Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Commissioner Stefan Füle on the situation in Tunisia on 13 and 17 January 2011 respectively,
– ob upoštevanju izjave predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Jerzyja Buzeka z dne 17. januarja 2011 o razmerah v Tuniziji,
– having regard to the statement made by Mr Buzek, President of the European Parliament, on the situation in Tunisia on 17 January 2011,
B. ker je policija s silo zatrla miroljubne demonstracije in tako povzročila več kot 100 mrtvih;
B. whereas the peaceful protest movement was violently repressed by the forces of law and order, leaving over one hundred dead,
C. ker Evropska unija ni sposobna razviti resnično usklajene in učinkovite zunanje politike do svojih partnerjev, zlasti ker so mehanizmi sodelovanja med EU in Tunizijo šibki, ter ker je treba ponovno poudariti zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta, da mora klavzulo o človekovih pravicah iz sporazuma o pridružitvi dosledno spremljati mehanizem za njeno učinkovito izvajanje, ker je zaradi tega treba pregledati sedanjo sosedsko politiko;
C. whereas the European Union has proved unable to develop a genuine foreign policy that is consistent and effective vis-à-vis its partners; particularly noting the weakness of the EU-Tunisia cooperation mechanisms and reiterating its call for human rights clauses in association agreements to be systematically backed up by a mechanism to implement those clauses; having regard in this context to the ongoing and necessary review of the neighbourhood policy,