natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
· Poročevalka meni, da bi neobvezne rezervirane navedbe iz priloge II morale ostati v enotni skupni ureditvi trga in bi jih zato bilo treba vključiti v uredbo o tržnih standardih, saj bolje odraža naravo neobveznih instrumentov politike.
· Your rapporteur believes optional reserved terms (comprised in Annex II) should remain in the Single CMO and therefore should be included in the Regulation on marketing standards, as it better reflects the nature of these optional policy instruments.
Hkrati potrebujemo pravno podlago za neobvezne navedbe kakovosti , ki jih bo Komisija morda predlagala v prihodnosti.
At the same time, a legal basis for optional quality terms that the Commission may put forward in the future is needed.
Zato poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba tako pravno podlago obdržati.
Thus, the rapporteur believes such a legal basis should be kept.
Kot prvo tako neobvezno navedbo kakovosti poročevalka predlaga „proizvod gorskega kmetovanja“.
As first such optional quality term, your rapporteur propose the 'products of mountain farming';
· Poročevalka meni, da bi bilo treba uvesti shemo za proizvode gorskega kmetovanja .
· Your rapporteur believes a scheme for products of mountain farming should be introduced.
Po obsežnih posvetovanjih je postalo jasno, da si te sheme ne želijo samo v sektorju, temveč je bilo ugotovljeno, da bi prineslo jasno dodano vrednost za potrošnika in za vrednost proizvodov.
Following extensive consultations, it became clear that this scheme is not only desired by the sector, but also the clear added value it would result for the consumer and the value of the products was established.
· Prav tako upamo, da bo Komisija preučila in kmalu predlagala nove neobvezne navedbe kakovosti, kot so „otoški“ in „arktični“ proizvodi.
· Also, we hope the Commission will analyze and will be able to present soon proposals for new optional quality terms, such as 'island', 'Arctic' products.
Nadalje zahtevamo dodatni razmislek v okviru predlagane ureditve prostovoljnih pravil označevanja govedine.
We further request further consideration within the proposed regulation of voluntary labelling system for beef.
· Kar zadeva vlogo skupin proizvajalcev v shemah ZOP in ZGO je poročevalka naklonjena predlogu Komisije in si želi, da bi bile te čim prej vzpostavljene.
· As regards the role of producer groups in the PDO and PGI schemes, your rapporteur is in favour of the Commission proposals and wishes to see these put in place at the soonest.
Poročevalka meni, da obstajajo pogoji za dodatno okrepitev vloge skupin.
Moreover, your rapporteur believes the conditions for a further strengthening of the role played by the groups are met.
Zato predlaga, da se pod skrbnim nadzorom držav članic in Komisije skupinam proizvajalcem v omejenih in nadzorovanih razmerah dodeli vloga vzpostavitve ukrepov za upravljanje proizvodnje.
Thus, I propose that in carefully limited and controlled situations a role for establishing production management measures be granted to producer groups, under the tight supervision of Member States and the Commission.
Razlog je v tem, da je bilo dokazano, da taki sistemi lahko vodijo k večji stabilnosti za proizvajalce proizvodov ZOP in ZGO z visoko vrednostjo in preprečijo spremenljivost cen v tem sektorju.
This is because it has been demonstrated that such systems may lead to greater stability for producers of PDO and PGI high value products and avoid extreme price volatility in this sector.
· Kar zadeva izvrševanje smernic (o prostovoljnih shemah certificiranja in uporabe ZOP/ZGO kot sestavin) pozivamo Komisijo, naj najkasneje tri leta po uveljavitvi te uredbe zakonodajalcu poroča o možnosti uvedbe zavezujoče zakonodaje na tem področju.
· As regards the application of the guidelines (on voluntary certification schemes and the use of PDOs/PGIs as ingredients, we demand that the Commission report to the legislator 3 years following the entry into force of this Regulation on the possibility to introduce mandatory legislation in this field;
· Poročevalka zagotavlja tudi pojasnila v zvezi s postopki za ugovor , in sicer tako, da omogoči podaljšanje predvidenega časa, če je verjetno, da bo dosežen sporazum.
· Your rapporteur also makes clarifications with regards to procedures for opposition , by creating a possibility for the extension of the time foreseen, when it is likely that an agreement will be reaached;
· Poročevalka predlaga, da se v priloge, ki zajemajo proizvode, ki lahko imajo ZOP, ZGO ali ZTP zaščito, vključijo dodatni proizvodi.
· Your rapporteur proposes that additional products are included in the annexes that include the products that can benefit from PDO, PGI and TSG protection.
· Priloga II (neobvezne rezervirane navedbe) se premakne v uredbo o tržnih standardih.
· Annex II (currently the optional reserved terms) shall be moved to the Regulation on marketing standards.
Kar zadeva uskladitev poročevalka meni, da je treba doseči ravnotežje med potrebo, da Komisija deluje učinkovito in hitro, in pooblastili, ki jih imata po Lizbonski pogodbi Parlament in Svet v zvezi z zakonodajnim postopkom.
With regards to alignment, your rapporteur believes a balance should be achieved between the need for the Commission to act efficiently and expediently on one hand and the powers Parliament and Council have under the Lisbon Treaty with regards to the legislative process.
Poročevalka je v splošnem naklonjena večini predlogov za delegirane ali izvedbene akte in meni, da je Komisija v zvezi s tem podala uravnotežen predlog.
Your rapporteur is generally in favour of most proposals for delegated or implementing acts and believes the Commission has made a balanced proposal in this regard.
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Hans-Petru Martinu
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Hansu-Petru Martinu, ki jo je 29. aprila 2011 posredovalo državno tožilstvo na Dunaju, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 12. maja 2011,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Hans-Peter Martin, forwarded by the Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office on 29 April 2011 and announced in plenary sitting on 12 May 2011,
– po zagovoru Hans-Petra Martina 21. maja 2011 v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Hans-Peter Martin on 21 May 2011, in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 in člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Article 9 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju člena 57 avstrijske ustave,
– having regard to the provisions of Article 57 of the Austrian Constitution,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0267/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0267/2011 ),
A. ker je državno tožilstvo na Dunaju zahtevalo odvzem imunitete poslancu Evropskega parlamenta Hansu-Petru Martinu, kar bi avstrijskim oblastem omogočilo, da opravijo potrebne preiskave in sprožijo sodni postopek zoper Hansa-Petra Martina, zahtevajo preiskavo njegovega doma in pisarne, zasežejo listine in opravijo pregled računalnika ali po potrebi drugih elektronskih naprav in začnejo kazenski postopek zoper poslanca Hansa-Petra Martina zaradi poneverbe sredstev stranke ali druge pravne opredelitve domnevnega kaznivega dejanja ali kaznivih dejanj pred pristojnim kazenskim sodiščem,
A. whereas the Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office has requested the waiver of immunity of Hans-Peter Martin, Member of the European Parliament, in order to enable the Austrian authorities to conduct the necessary investigations and to take legal action against Hans-Peter Martin, to call for a search of his house or offices, to seize documents and to carry out computer checks or any other electronic searches which may be necessary and to initiate criminal proceedings against Mr Martin on the grounds of misappropriation of party funding or any other legal description that might be given to the alleged offence(s) before the criminal courts having jurisdiction,
B. ker odvzem imunitete Hansu-Petru Martinu zadeva domnevna kazniva dejanja v zvezi s poneverbo sredstev stranke, ki je vsebovana v oddelku 2b zakona o političnih strankah,
B. whereas the waiver of immunity of Hans-Peter Martin concerns alleged offences related to misappropriation of party funding, covered by Section 2b of the Law on Political Parties,
C. ker je zato primerno, da se v tem primeru priporoči odvzem poslanske imunitete,
C. whereas it is therefore advisable to recommend that parliamentary immunity be waived in the case in question,
Na plenarnem zasedanju 12. maja 2011 je predsednik skladno s členom 6(2) Poslovnika sporočil, da je 29. aprila 2011 prejel pismo državnega tožilstva na Dunaju, ki ga je posredovalo stalno predstavništvo Avstrije pri Evropski uniji, z zahtevo, da se Hansu-Petru Martinu odvzame poslanska imuniteta.
At the plenary sitting of 12 May 2011, the President announced, in accordance with Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure that he had received a letter from the Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office, forwarded by the Permanent Representation of Austria to the European Union on 29 April 2011, requesting the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Mr Hans-Peter Martin.
Državno tožilstvo na Dunaju namerava začeti postopek zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta Hansa-Petra Martina, na podlagi navedb, da je Hans-Peter Martin kršil določbe oddelka 2b avstrijskega zakona o političnih strankah s tem, da je nezakonito uporabil državna sredstva za pokrivanje zasebnih stroškov in za plačevanje pretiranih računov, ki so mu jih izdajali prijatelji ali poslovni partnerji.
The Vienna Public Prosecutor’s Office intends to institute proceedings against Mr Hans-Peter Martin, Member of the European Parliament, on the basis of allegations that Mr Hans-Peter Martin has breached the provisions of Section 2b of the Austrian Law on Political Parties by using State funding inappropriately to meet private expenditure and to settle inflated invoices submitted to him by friends or business associates.
Te navedbe se nanašajo na obdobje evropske volilne kampanje v letih 2008 in 2009.
The allegations relate to the period of the European election campaign, between 2008 and 2009.
Poleg tega je Hans-Peter Martin obtožen, da je zavedel revizorje, odgovorne za pregled uporabe sredstev, s predložitvijo fiktivnih listin, s katerimi je želel upravičiti zakonitost vodenja računov in/ali izkazati pravno podlago za uporabo sredstev.
In addition, Mr Martin is accused of having misled the auditors responsible for scrutinising the use of funds by submitting ‘fictitious documents’ to justify the lawfulness of the accounting and/or the legal basis for the use of funds.
Dunajsko tožilstvo namerava med postopkom odrediti različne preiskave, zlasti prostorov, ki jih je uporabljalo osebje „Liste Martin“, in pridobiti informacije o bančnih računih in transakcijah v Avstriji in Nemčiji.
In the course of the preliminary investigation, the Vienna Prosecutor’s Office intends to order searches, in particular on the premises used by the staff of the ‘Liste Martin’ and to obtain the release of information concerning bank accounts and bank transactions in both Austria and Germany.
Med zaslišanjem v Odboru za pravne zadeve je Hans-Peter Martin zatrjeval, da je postopek začet na pobudo drugega poslanca in njegovega asistenta, da bi zasedel njegovo mesto poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
In the course of his hearing by the Committee on Legal Affairs, Mr Martin maintained that the prosecution was brought as a result of the efforts of another Member and his assistant to take his place as Member of the European Parliament.
To je pomenilo nezakonito pridobitev listin v prostorih Evropskega parlamenta ter prestrezanje elektronske pošte Hansa-Petra Martina, o čemer se je poslanec pritožil predsedniku Buzku.
This had involved obtaining documents illegally from the premises of the European Parliament and the interception of Mr Martin’s emails, about which Mr Martin had complained to President Buzek.
Protokol št. 7 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije, ki je priloga k pogodbam, določa:
Protocol No 7 on privileges and Immunities of the European Union annexed to the Treaties provides as follows:
a) na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države,
a)in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament,
b) na ozemlju drugih držav članic imuniteto pred kakršnim koli ukrepom ali priporom in sodnim postopkom.
b)in the territory of other Member States, immunity from any measure or detention and from legal proceedings.
Za člane velja imuniteta tudi med tem, ko potujejo do kraja zasedanja Evropskega parlamenta in nazaj.
Immunity shall likewise apply to Members while they are travelling to and from the place of meeting of the European parliament.
Avstrijsko pravo
Austrian Law
Oddelek 2b avstrijskega zakona o političnih strankah določa:
Section 2 b of the Austrian Law on Political Parties reads as follows:
(1) Za dejavnosti stikov z javnostmi prejme vsaka politična stranka na zahtevo javna sredstva v obsegu, določenem v nadaljevanju.
(1) For purposes of public relations activities, each political party shall, upon request, be granted public funds to the extent provided as follows.
(2) Obseg sredstev se določi, kot sledi:
(2) The volume of such grants shall be ascertained as follows:
a) vsaka stranka, ki ima v državnem zboru najmanj pet poslancev (minimalna zahteva, da se ustanovi skupina), prejme osnovni znesek v višini 218.019 EUR letno;
a) each party represented in the National Council with at least five Members (minimum requirement for constituting a club) shall receive an annual basic amount of Euro 218 019;
b) po odbitju zneskov iz pododstavka a) se preostala sredstva iz odstavka 1 razdelijo med politične stranke, ki imajo predstavnike v državnem zboru, sorazmerno s številom prejetih glasov na zadnjih volitvah v državni zbor;
b) after deduction of the amounts due pursuant to subparagraph a, the remaining funds pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be distributed among the political parties represented in the National Council pro rata to the votes cast for them in the last National Council elections held;
c) politične stranke, ki nimajo predstavnika v državnem zboru, vendar so na volitvah v državni zbor prejele več kot 1 odstotek veljavnih oddanih glasov, imajo v letu volitev pravico do sredstev za stike z javnostmi (odstavek 1) enako kot politične stranke iz pododstavka b); ta sredstva se izplačajo v prvem četrtletju leta, ki sledi volitvam.
c) political parties not represented in the National Council but having received in an election to the National Council more than 1 per cent of the valid votes cast, shall for the election year be entitled to funds granted for the purpose of public relations activities (paragraph 1) in the same way as political parties pursuant to sub-paragraph b; such funds shall be paid during the first quarter of the year following the election.
(3) Sredstva, dodeljena v skladu z odstavkom 2, znašajo 14.383.200 EUR.
(3) The funds granted pursuant to paragraph 2 shall amount to Euro 14 383 200.
Nazadnje je treba glede na to, da člen 9(a) protokola napotuje na uporabo nacionalnih določb o imuniteti, upoštevati avstrijsko ustavo, ki v členu 57 določa:
Lastly, given that Article 9(a) of the Protocol refers to national law on immunities, it is necessary to refer to the Austrian Constitution, Article 57 of which provides as follows:
(1) Poslanec državnega zbora ni kazensko odgovoren za glas, ki ga je izrekel pri izvajanju svoje funkcije, za ustne ali pisne izjave, ki jih je podal med izvajanjem svoje funkcije, pa lahko odgovarja le pred državnim zborom.
( 1) The members of the National Council may never be made responsible for votes cast in the exercise of their function and only by the National Council on the grounds of oral or written utterances made in the course of their function.
(2) Poslanec državnega zbora je lahko priprt zaradi kaznivega dejanja le s privolitvijo državnega zbora, razen če je bil zaloten pri kaznivem dejanju.
(2) The members of the National Council may on the ground of a criminal offence – the case of apprehension in the act of committing a crime excepted – be arrested only with the consent of the National Council.
Privolitev državnega zbora je potrebna tudi za hišne preiskave pri poslancih državnega zbora.
Domiciliary visitations of National Council members likewise require the National Council ’ s consent.
(3) Sodni postopek zaradi kaznivega dejanja proti poslancu državnega zbora se lahko brez dovoljenja zbora začne le, če to dejanje očitno ni povezano s politično dejavnostjo zadevnega poslanca.
(3) Legal action on the ground of a criminal offence may otherwise without the national Council ’ s consent be taken against members of the National Council only if it is manifestly not connected with the political activity of the member in question.
Pristojni organ mora vseeno zaprositi državni zbor, da se izreče o obstoju tovrstne povezave, če tako zahteva zadevni poslanec ali tretjina članov stalnega odbora, ki je pristojen za ta vprašanja.
The authority concerned must however seek a decision by the National Council on the existence of such a connection if the member in question or a third of the members belonging to the Standing Committee entrusted with these matters so demands.
V primeru takšne zahteve se mora sodni postopek takoj prekiniti ali prenehati.
Every act of legal process shall in the case of such a demand immediately cease or be discontinued.
(4) V vseh primerih se šteje, da je državni zbor dal svoj pristanek, če v roku osmih tednov ni odgovoril na ustrezno zahtevo organa, pristojnega za sodni postopek; da bi zagotovil pravočasno sprejetje odločitve državnega zbora, predsednik predloži glasovanje o takšni zahtevi vsaj dan pred iztekom tega roka.
(4) In all these cases the consent of the National Council counts as granted if within eight weeks it has not given a ruling on an appropriate request by the authority competent for the institution of legal action; the President, with a view to the National Council ’ s adoption of a resolution in good time, shall at the latest put such a request to the vote on the day but one before expiry of the deadline.
Pri določitvi tega roka se ne upošteva obdobja, ko državni zbor ne zaseda.
The latter does not include the period when the National Council is not in session.
(5) V primeru, da je bil poslanec priprt, ker je bil zaloten pri kaznivem dejanju, mora zadevni organ o priprtju nemudoma obvestiti predsednika državnega zbora.
(5) In case of a member ’ s apprehension in the act of committing a crime, the authority concerned must immediately notify the President of the National Council of the occurrence of the arrest.
Če tako zahteva državni zbor ali, v času, ko ta ne zaseda, stalni odbor, pristojen za ta vprašanja, je treba prekiniti pripor ali opustiti celoten sodni postopek.
If the National Council or when it is not in session the Standing Committee entrusted with these matters so demands, the arrest must be suspended or the legal process as a whole be dropped.
(6) Imuniteta poslancem preneha z dnevom ustanovne seje novoizvoljenega državnega zbora, funkcionarjem državnega zbora, katerih mandat traja dlje, pa ob izteku njihovega mandata.
(6) The immunity of members ends with the day of the meeting of the newly elected National Council, that of functionaries of the National Council whose tenure of office extends beyond this date on the expiry of this term of office.
(7) Zvezni zakon o poslovniku državnega zbora podrobneje ureja te določbe.
(7) The detailed provisions are settled by the federal law on the House of Representatives ’ Standing Orders.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(2) Poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti poslančeve imunitete, Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament Hansu-Petru Martinu odvzame imuniteto.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs, having examined the reasons for and against waiving the Member’s immunity, recommends that the European Parliament should waive the parliamentary immunity of Hans-Peter Martin.
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Alexandra Thein, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Alexandra Thein, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško o postopku predaje med državami članicami Evropske unije ter Islandijo in Norveško
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway
Poročevalec: Rui Tavarestta
Rapporteur: Rui Tavares
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (05307/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (05307/2010),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma med Evropsko unijo ter Republiko Islandijo in Kraljevino Norveško o postopku predaje med državami članicami Evropske unije ter Islandijo in Norveško (09644/2006),
– having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the surrender procedure between the Member States of the European Union and Iceland and Norway (09644/2006),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s točko (d) člena 82(1) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0032/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0032/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A7-0268/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A7-0268/2011 ),
Julija 2001 je Svet pooblastil predsedstvo Sveta, da ob pomoči Evropske komisije začne pogajanja o sporazumih o medsebojni pravni pomoči in izročitvi z Norveško in Islandijo.
In July 2001 the Council authorised the Council Presidency, assisted by the European Commission, to start negotiating MLA and extradition agreements with Norway and Iceland.
Sporazum o izročitvi naj bi za Norveško in Islandijo uveljavil določbe Konvencije EU o izročitvi iz leta 1996, za katero velja, da ne sodi v schengenski pravni red.
The extradition agreement was due to apply to Iceland and Norway the provisions of the 1996 EU Convention on Extradition, considered as not being part of the Schengen aquis.
Opis nalog je bil spremenjen leta 2002, ko je bilo dogovorjeno, da bo izročitev znotraj EU nadomestil postopek predaje v okviru evropskega naloga za prijetje.
The mission statement was updated in 2002 after it was agreed that extradition within the EU would be replaced by a surrender procedure under the European arrest warrant.