natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da se kot primernega premoženja ne bi smelo opredeliti le dvostopenjskih komercialnih zapisov, zavarovanih s premoženjem, zato poziva Komisijo, da v skladu s četrto alineo člena 19(1)(h) Direktive KNPVP-III dovoli tudi druge komercialne zapise, zavarovane s premoženjem, kot primerno premoženje za KNPVP;
Takes the view that not only two-tier asset-backed commercial papers should be authorised as eligible assets, and calls, therefore, on the Commission, having due regard to the fourth indent of Article 19(1)(h) of the UCITS-III Directive, also to allow other asset-backed commercial papers as UCITS assets;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije o strategiji širitve in glavnih izzivih 2006–2007 ( 2006/2252(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the Commission's Communication on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2006–2007 ( 2006/2252(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o strategiji širitve in glavnih izzivih za obdobje 2006–2007 ( KOM(2006)0649 ),
having regard to the Commission's Communication on the Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2006–2007 ( COM(2006)0649 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Kobenhavnu 21. in 22. junija 1993, v Madridu 15. in 16. decembra 1995, v Luksemburgu 12. in 13. decembra 1997, v Solunu 19. in 20. junija 2003 in v Bruslju 16. in 17. decembra 2004, 16. in 17. junija 2005 ter 15. in 16. junija 2006,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Copenhagen European Council of 21-22 June 1993 and of the Madrid European Council of 15-16 December 1995, of the Luxembourg European Council of 12-13 December 1997, of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19-20 June 2003 and of the Brussels Councils of 16-17 December 2004, 16-17 June 2005 and 15-16 June 2006,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. januarja 2006 o obdobju za razmislek: potek, teme in okvir za ovrednotenje razprave o Evropski uniji UL C 287 E, 24.11.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2006 on the period of reflection: the structure, subjects and context for an assessment of the debate on the European Union OJ C 287 E, 24.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0436/2006 ), ker:
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0436/2006 ), whereas,
je Evropska unija politični projekt, ki temelji na skupnih vrednotah in na ciljih, katere se zasleduje skupaj,
the European Union is a political project based on shared values and commonly pursued objectives,
se je EU razvila v politično unijo demokracij, ki se zavzema za demokratične standarde in za razvoj prave demokratične kulture,
the EU has evolved into a political union of democracies which is itself committed to democratic standards and to developing a vivid democratic culture,
so spodbude, ki jih ponuja možnost članstva v EU nedvomno prispevale k spodbujanju reform, utrjevanju demokracije, krepitvi spoštovanja človekovih pravic in večji stabilnosti v sosednjih državah,
the incentive offered by the prospect of EU membership has undeniably contributed to the promotion of reforms, the consolidation of democracy, increased respect for human rights and increasing stability in neighbouring countries,
Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Solunu 19. in 20. junija 2003 ponovno potrdil zavezo k polni izvedbi solunskega načrta, Evropski svet v Bruslju z dne 15. in 16. junija 2006 pa je potrdil, da namerava spoštovati svoje obveznosti do jugovzhodnih evropskih držav glede širitve (Turčija in Hrvaška, državi, s katerima pogajanja o pristopu že potekajo, država kandidatka Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija in države zahodnega Balkana kot možne kandidatke), pri tem pa poudaril potrebo po zagotovitvi "zmožnosti delovanja Unije v političnem, finančnem in institucionalnem smislu tudi po širitvi",
the Thessaloniki European Council of 19-20 June 2003 reaffirmed the commitment to full implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda, and the Brussels European Council of 15-16 June 2006 reaffirmed the intention to honour the existing commitments made to the South-East European countries (Turkey and Croatia, countries with which accession negotiations are underway, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia/FYROM, as candidate country, and the Western Balkans countries, as potential candidates) concerning enlargement, while emphasising the need to ensure that the Union "is able to function politically, financially and institutionally as it enlarges",
lahko Evropski parlament v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti in s podporo regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter organi civilne družbe prispeva k večji preglednosti in odgovornosti procesa širitve ter s tem poveča soglašanje javnosti glede tega vprašanja,
the European Parliament, in conjunction with national parliaments, and with the support of regional and local authorities and civil society bodies, can contribute to improving transparency and accountability of the enlargement process and thereby increase public consensus on this issue,
širitev bi morala, kakor je določeno v Pogodbi, prispevati k procesu evropske integracije in doseganju vse tesnejše zveze med narodi Evrope in ne spodkopavati politične narave tega projekta; morala bi spodbujati mir, varnost, stabilnost, demokracijo in blaginjo v Evropi,
enlargement should – as laid down in the Treaty – contribute to the European integration process and to the achievement of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe but not undermine the political nature of this project; it should promote peace, security, stability, democracy and prosperity in Europe,
zato je treba pri razmišljanju o prihodnosti Unije upoštevati njeno sposobnost integracije,
for that reason, the Union's integration capacity must be taken into account when consideration is given to the future of the Union,
izjava Evropskega sveta v Kobenhavnu z dne 21. in 22. junija 1993 navaja, da je "sposobnost sprejeti nove države članice in hkrati ohraniti zagon evropske integracije" pomembno vprašanje,
the declaration issued at the European Council in Copenhagen of 21-22 June 1993 mentioned as an important consideration 'the Union's capacity to absorb new members, while maintaining the momentum of European integration',
ker bi se morale države članice in institucije EU pogumno spoprijeti z institucionalnimi, finančnimi in političnimi dejavniki, ki so temeljni za sposobnost Unije, da integrira nove države članice,
Member States and the EU Institutions must address courageously the institutional, financial and political factors which underlie the Union's capacity to integrate new Member States,
ker to predpostavlja temeljito analizo posledic, ki bi jih lahko povečano članstvo imelo na kohezijsko politiko Unije in njene finance,
this presupposes a thorough analysis of the implications which increased membership may entail for the Union's cohesion policies and for its finances,
ker je sposobnost integracije razvojni koncept, ki ga je treba redno ocenjevati glede na nove okoliščine,
integration capacity is an evolutionary concept which must be assessed regularly in the light of new circumstances,
ker temelji sposobnost integracije na objektivnih merilih in ker se nanaša na konkretne težave ter je zato ne bi smeli zamenjevati s predstavo javnosti o tem, kakšen bo učinek nadaljnjih širitev,
integration capacity is based on objective criteria and addresses real problems and therefore should not be confused with public perception of the impact of further enlargements,
sposobnost integracije ni novo merilo, veljavno za države kandidatke, temveč predpogoj za uspeh širitve in poglobitev procesa evropske integracije; je za izboljšanje sposobnosti integracije odgovorna Unija in ne države kandidatke,
integration capacity is not a new criterion applicable to the candidate countries but a pre-requisite for the success of enlargement and for deepening the process of European integration; responsibility for improving its integration capacity lies with the Union and not with the candidate countries,
morajo države pristopnice in države kandidatke izpolniti pristopna merila, uvedena s strani Evropskega sveta v Kobenhavnu (københavnska merila) in vse ostale obveznosti iz pogodb in dvostranskih sporazumov,
acceding and candidate countries must comply with the accession criteria established by the Copenhagen European Council (Copenhagen criteria) and all other obligations stemming from the Treaties and bilateral agreements,
se strinja s Komisijo, da so bile pretekle širitve uspeh, da so okrepile Evropsko unijo s spodbujanjem gospodarske rasti, s krepitvijo njene vloge v svetu in spodbujanjem razvoja novih politik EU, demokracije, miru in blaginje v Evropi; poudarja, da je na splošno širitev eden najučinkovitejših instrumentov zunanje politike in politik za reševanje sporov EU; opozarja, da ta uspeh izvira iz široke podpore preteklih širitev kot izpolnitve prvotnega poslanstva evropske integracije – združitve evropskega kontinenta po političnih razhajanjih 20. stoletja;
Agrees with the Commission that past enlargements have been a success, have strengthened the European Union by stimulating its economic growth, reinforcing its role in the world and promoting the development of new EU policies, and have promoted democracy, peace and prosperity in Europe; emphasises that enlargement in general is among the most effective instruments of foreign policy and conflict prevention policies of the EU; recalls that this success derives from the widespread support for past enlargements as the fulfilment of the initial mission of European integration to reunite the European continent after the political divisions of the twentieth century;
vseeno ugotavlja, da smo se iz preteklih izkušenj naučili predvsem tega, da je treba vsako državo kandidatko ocenjevati na osnovi lastnih zaslug in se pogajati o pristopu v skladu s časovnim razporedom na osnovi učinkovitega izpolnjevanja københavnskih meril, ter da se je treba izogniti prezgodnjemu določanju datuma za končni pristop;
Notes nevertheless that lessons can be learned from past experience, notably the need to judge each candidate country on its own merits and to negotiate its accession in accordance with a timetable based on effective compliance with the Copenhagen criteria, as well as the need to avoid setting too early a date for final accession;
meni, da moramo zaradi teh izkušenj izboljšati kvaliteto in preglednost širitvenega procesa;
Believes that these lessons should be used to improve the quality and transparency of the enlargement process;
meni, da bi morala Unija spoštovati svoje zaveze do držav, ki že imajo možnost članstva, pod pogojem, da bodo te države izpolnjevale københavnska merila za članstvo v EU in obveznosti, ki iz njega izhajajo; poudarja, da je izpolnjevanje teh zavez močna spodbuda tem državam za nadaljevanje reform;
Is of the opinion that the Union should honour its commitments to the countries which already have membership prospects, provided that those countries comply with the Copenhagen criteria and fulfil the obligations arising therefrom; emphasises that fulfilment of these commitments is a strong incentive for those countries to pursue their reforms;
se strinja, da so utrjevanje zavez, izpolnjevanje pogojev in obveščanje vodilna načela strategije širitve EU; meni, da bo vsaka nadaljnja zaveza k širitvi zahtevala veliko večji nadzor kot kdaj prej nad vprašanjem sposobnosti integracije Unije, naj bo to z institucionalnega, finančnega ali političnega vidika;
Agrees that consolidation, conditionality and communication are the guiding principles of the EU's enlargement strategy; is of the view that any further commitment to enlarge will require far more in-depth scrutiny than ever before of the question of the Union's integration capacity, be it from an institutional, financial or political standpoint;
zato obžaluje, da Komisija ni uspela zagotoviti zadostno poglobljene analize vprašanj, ki jih je treba rešiti, preden lahko Unija nadaljuje z nadaljnjimi širitvami;
Therefore regrets the Commission's failure to provide a sufficiently in-depth analysis of the issues which need to be resolved before the Union can proceed with further enlargements;
meni, da je "Posebno poročilo o sposobnosti EU za vključitev novih članic" v Prilogi I Sporočila nezadovoljiv odgovor na zahtevo Parlamenta iz odstavka 5 njegove zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 16. marca 2006 za "poročilo, v katerem določi načela, ki podpirajo to opredelitev";
Considers the 'Special report on the EU's capacity to integrate new members' in Annex I of the Communication, an unsatisfactory answer to Parliament's request, in paragraph 5 of its abovementioned resolution of 16 March 2006, for a 'report ... setting out the principles which underpin this concept';
meni, da sposobnost Unije za integracijo temelji v osnovi na treh stebrih, in sicer na njenih institucijah ter njihovi legitimnosti in sposobnosti, da v novih okoliščinah demokratično in učinkovito ukrepajo in sprejemajo odločitve, na njenih finančnih virih in njihovem celotnem prispevku k ekonomski in socialni koheziji ter na sposobnosti razširjene Unije, da zasleduje svoje politične cilje;
Is of the opinion that the integration capacity of the Union rests fundamentally on three pillars, namely its institutions and their legitimacy and ability to act and take decisions democratically and efficiently under new circumstances, its financial resources and their overall contribution to economic and social cohesion, and the capacity of an enlarged Union to pursue its political objectives;
opozarja, da je zato za izboljšanje sposobnosti integracije odgovorna Unija in ne države kandidatke;
Recalls that responsibility for improving its integration capacity therefore lies with the Union and not with the candidate countries;
meni, da lahko EU pričakuje od svojih državljanov pozitiven odnos do širitve le, če vidijo Evropo, ki dosega rezultate; zato poudarja, da sposobnosti integracije ne smemo videti ločene od sposobnosti EU za ukrepanje; meni, da bi morala biti širitev del agende državljanov Unije in da je treba v skladu s tem o njej komunicirati;
Believes that the EU can only expect its citizens to have a positive attitude towards enlargement if they see a Europe that delivers results; emphasises, therefore, that integration capacity cannot be seen in isolation from the EU's capacity to act; considers that enlargement should be a part of the Union's Citizens" Agenda and should be communicated accordingly;
meni, da pravilno delovanje Unije temelji na brezpogojni vdanosti vseh njenih članic k univerzalnim vrednotam, ki jih EU poudarja kot politični projekt: neodtujljivost in nedotakljivost človekovih pravic, svoboda, demokracija, enakost in pravna država, ki predstavljajo evropsko identiteto;
Considers that the Union's proper functioning rests on the unqualified adherence of all its members to the universal values that underlie the EU as a political project: the inalienable and inviolable rights of the human person, freedom, democracy, equality and the rule of law which make up the European identity;
verjame, da lahko neuspeh pri zagotavljanju skladnosti med sposobnostjo integracije EU in načrtom širitve oslabi Unijo navznoter in navzven ter zmanjša prednosti nastajajočega članstva za vse članice, ter da te posledice ni mogoče nadomestiti s povečano zunanjo velikostjo;
Believes that any failure to ensure that the EU's integration capacity matches its enlargement agenda would weaken the Union internally and externally and reduce the benefits of increased membership for all its members, and that this effect would not be compensated by increased external size;
opozarja na pogoje iz svoje zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 19. januarja 2006 in ponovno poudarja, da po pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije Pogodba iz Nice ne bo zagotovila zadostne osnove za nadaljnje širitve;
Recalls the terms of its abovementioned resolution of 19 January 2006 and reaffirms that, following the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, the Treaty of Nice will not provide an adequate basis for further enlargements;
zato poziva voditelje držav in vlad, da do konca leta 2008 zaključijo ustavni postopek, kot je bilo določeno na Evropskem Svetu v Bruslju junija 2006, s čimer bi Uniji omogočili bolj učinkovito, pregledno in demokratično delovanje, kar je predpogoj za nadaljnje širitve;
Therefore urges the Heads of State and Government to conclude the constitutional process by the end of 2008, as stated at the European Council in Brussels of June 2006, in order the enable the Union to work more effectively, more transparently and more democratically, which is a pre-requisite for further enlargements;
opozarja voditelje držav in vlad na njihovo dolžnost zaključiti postopek pred naslednjimi evropskimi volitvami, da bi se izognili zamudi pri trenutnih pristopnih pogajanjih;
Reminds Heads of State and Government of their duty to complete this process before the next European elections, so as to avoid delay in current accession negotiations;
poudarja, da je institucionalna reforma Unije potrebna sama po sebi, ne glede na nadaljnje širitve, ter da bi si bilo treba zanjo prizadevati odločno in hitro;
Emphasises that the institutional reform of the Union is a need per se, regardless of further enlargements, and should be pursued rigorously and expeditiously;
ponovno poudarja, da bodo pristopna pogajanja napredovala glede na zasluge in dosežke vsakega pogajalskega partnerja;
Confirms that accession negotiations will progress according to the merits and achievements of each negotiating partner;
pozdravlja in podpira zavezo Komisije, da bo izboljšala kvaliteto pristopnega procesa in ga naredila za bolj ciljno usmerjenega in preglednega ter na ključnih točkah procesa sistematično ocenjevala vpliv na ključna politična področja;
Welcomes and supports the Commission's commitment to improve the quality of the accession process by making it more benchmark-driven and transparent and by systematically making impact assessments on key policy areas at key stages of the process;
je mnenja, da mora načrtovana revizija proračuna Unije za leti 2008/2009 upoštevati nadaljnjo integracijo sedanjih kandidatk in držav, ki so zaprosile za status kandidatke;
Takes the view that the planned revision of the Union's budget in 2008/2009 must take account of the future integration of the current candidate and pre-candidate countries;
poudarja, da sporočilo Komisije finančnih posledic nadaljnjih širitev ne obravnava izčrpno in poziva Komisijo, naj pred nadaljnjimi širitvami pripravi jasne in verodostojne ocene učinka na proračun;
Points out that the Commission's Communication does not deal thoroughly with the financial implications of further enlargements and calls on the Commission to provide clear and credible estimates of the budgetary implications before any further accession;
ponovno poudarja, da ta razprava vsebuje zahtevna vprašanja, ki bi lahko vplivala na skupne politike, tudi na kohezijsko politiko;
Reiterates that this debate involves difficult issues which might have implications for the Union's common policies, including its cohesion policies;
meni, da se je treba nujno spoprijeti s finančnimi učinki nadaljnjih širitev, katerih zapletenost so posredno priznali voditelji držav in vlad, ko so zavrnili njihovo vključitev v finančni okvir 2007–2013; poziva Svet za splošne zadeve in svet ECOFIN, naj o tem vprašanju opravita skupno razpravo;
Takes the view that the financial implications of further enlargements, the complexity of which has been implicitly recognised by Heads of State and Government when they declined to take them into account in the 2007-2013 financial framework, must be urgently addressed; calls on the General Affairs and ECOFIN Councils to hold a joint debate on this issue;
poudarja, da bi moralo izpolnjevanje političnih meril, določenih na Evropskem svetu v Kobenhavnu, vključno z načelom pravne države, biti bolj v ospredju, kot je bilo v pristopnih pogajanjih doslej, ter da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti neposredno povezavo med temi merili ter začetkom in splošnim napredovanjem pogajanj;
Emphasises that compliance with the political criteria set out at the Copenhagen European Council, including in the area of the rule of law, should be given greater priority than has hitherto been the case in accession negotiations, and that a direct link should be established between those criteria and the start, as well as the overall pace, of negotiations;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil v sedanji pogajalski okvir vključen odstavek o sodstvu in temeljnih pravicah, ki bo institucijam EU omogočil, da bodo pozorno preučile napredek na teh ključnih področjih;
Welcomes in this respect the inclusion in the current negotiating framework of a chapter on Judiciary and Fundamental Rights, covering the political issues, which will enable EU institutions to closely scrutinise progress in these crucial areas;
meni, da pri prejšnjih širitvah napredku na področju pravosodja, korupcije in temeljnih pravic v zgodnjih fazah pogajanj ni bilo namenjeno dosti pozornosti; se zavezuje, da bo prevzel dejavnejšo vlogo pri spremljanju pristopnega procesa, s posebnim poudarkom na njegovih političnih vidikih, in poziva Svet, naj stori enako ter naj državam kandidatkam raje da jasna in dobro premišljena priporočila, kot da zgolj beleži tehnični napredek v pogajanjih;
Is of the opinion that in previous enlargements progress in the fields of justice, corruption and fundamental rights did not receive enough attention in the early phases of negotiations; pledges to take a much more active role in monitoring the accession process, with particular emphasis on its political aspects, and calls upon the Council to do the same and to issue clear and duly reasoned recommendations to candidate countries, rather than merely take note of technical progress in the negotiations;
opozarja na jasne možnosti za članstvo v EU, ki jih je Evropski svet v Solunu dne 19. in 20. junija 2003 ponudil državam zahodnega Balkana; ostaja v celoti zavezan tem obetom, ki jih je treba ohraniti za utrditev stabilnosti in mir v regiji; opozarja te države, da bo vsaka od njih ocenjena na osnovi lastnih zaslug in da bo to odločalo o hitrosti njihove integracije v EU;
Recalls the clear European membership prospects which the Thessaloniki European Council of 19-20 June 2003 offered to the western Balkan countries; remains fully committed to these prospects which have to be maintained in order to consolidate stability and peace in the region; reminds those countries that they will each be assessed on the basis of their own merits and that this will determine the pace of their integration into the EU;
pozdravlja odločitev Sveta z dne 13. novembra 2006, da sprejme pogajalske mandate za sporazuma o vizumskih olajšavah in o ponovnem sprejetju z državami zahodnega Balkana kot prvi korak pri spodbujanju medčloveških odnosov med temi državami in EU; kljub temu pa poudarja, da je cilj odprava potovalnih vizumov;
Welcomes the Council's decision of 13 November 2006 to adopt the negotiation mandates for visa facilitation and re-admission agreements with western Balkan countries as a first step in promoting people-to-people contacts between those countries and the EU; emphasises, however, that the objective is visa-free travel;
pozdravlja stalni napredek države kandidatke Hrvaške na poti do integracije v EU in poziva pogajalce na obeh straneh, naj ohranijo zagon, dosežen v teh pogajanjih, da se bodo hitro zaključila;
Welcomes the continued progress made by the candidate country Croatia towards EU integration and calls on the negotiators on both sides to maintain the momentum achieved in these negotiations, with a view to their early conclusion;