natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
kot praktičen predlog za izboljšanje učinkovitosti programov EU meni, da je nujno, da se pri pripravi novega proračuna bolje izkoristijo sedanji cikli upravljanja in proračunski cikli; v tehničnem smislu to pomeni, da je treba pri trenutnem postopku (proračun za leto 2010) pravočasno zagotoviti letna poročila o dejavnostih in njihovo zbirno poročilo za leto 2008, ki vsebujejo rezultate o tem, v kolikšni meri so bili cilji izpolnjeni, ter jih izčrpneje uporabiti v vseh predlogih Komisije v letu 2009; izraža željo, da bi morale obstajati "sistematične posledice" kot rezultat tega, kako napredujejo prejšnje prednostne naloge in cilji; kritizira dejstvo, da iz leta v leto ni namenjene dovolj pozornosti temu, kaj je bilo v povezavi z zgoraj navedenim narejenega in kako naj se to odraža v prihodnjih letih;
As a practical proposal to improve the performance of EU programmes, considers it necessary that the current management and budgetary cycles be better used when preparing the new budget; in technical terms this means that for the current procedure (Budget 2010), the AARs and their Synthesis report for 2008, containing the results on whether the objectives were fulfilled or not, must be available in time and more extensively used throughout the Commission's proposals made during 2009; stresses its wish that there should be "systematic consequences" as a result of how previous priorities and goals are progressing; criticises the fact that, from one year to another, there is not enough focus on what has been done with regard to these and how that should reflect on the following years;
pozdravlja določene izboljšave v poročilih o dejavnostih, ki se predložijo s predhodnim predlogom proračuna kot utemeljitev zahtevanih sredstev; obžaluje dejstvo, da informacije včasih še vedno niso zahtevane kakovosti, ki bi spodbudila na primer povečanje proračuna, ter prav tako obžaluje, da se proračunskemu organu še ni zdelo primerno nagraditi dobrih izvajalcev oz. nasprotno, ohraniti ali celo zmanjšati proračune oddelkov, ki imajo neustrezne rezultate;
Welcomes a certain improvement in Activity Statements which are provided with the PDB to justify the requested resources; deplores the fact, however, that information is still sometimes not of the quality required to motivate, say, a budget increase and, also, regrets that so far the budgetary authority has not really seen fit to reward "good performers" and, conversely, to maintain or even reduce the budgets of those departments that supply inadequate results;
meni, da je treba dolgoročne cilje in načrte, tj. večletni finančni okvir in petletne strateške cilje kakor tudi letno strategijo politik, bolje pojasniti ter povezati z delom posameznih generalnih direktoratov in služb kot pomemben del motiviranja zaposlenih, ki naj čutijo, da so del pomembnih ciljev organizacije kot celote ter da prispevajo k tem ciljem; zato zahteva od Komisije, da v svojih letnih načrtih upravljanja in letnih poročilih o dejavnostih jasneje poveže pozitivne in negativne prednostne naloge s splošnimi večletnimi strateškimi cilji;
Considers that the long-term objectives and plans, i.e. the MFF and the five-year strategic objectives as well as APS also need to be better explained and linked to the work of individual DGs and services as an important part of motivating these staff and making them feel part of, and contributors to, the overriding objectives of the organisation as a whole; asks the Commission, therefore, to link more clearly the positive and negative priorities in the Annual Management Plans and AARs to the overall multiannual and strategic objectives;
prav tako meni, da ti strateški cilji na žalost večinoma niso predmet nikakršnega resnega poskusa vrednotenja glede napredka; meni, da bi lahko na primer opravili srednjeročni pregled izpolnjevanja strateških ciljev in da bi se vsi generalni direktorati lahko vključili v ta proces, tako da bi navedli, kateri ukrepi so bili izvedeni, katera sredstva uporabljena in kako je to prispevalo k izpolnjevanju splošnih ciljev; poudarja, da je treba z namenom, da bi to uresničili v praksi, v strateškem kontekstu čimbolj opredeliti cilje in kazalnike, uporabljene za merjenje uspešnosti;
Also believes that, by and large, these strategic objectives are unfortunately not subject to any real attempt of evaluation in terms of progress; believes that, for example, a mid-term review on how the strategic goals have been met could be implemented and that each DG could feed into that process by indicating what actions have been undertaken, what resources have been used, and how this has contributed to fulfilling the overall goals; stresses that, in order to achieve this practicably, the objectives and indicators used to measure performance would also need to be defined in that strategic context as far as possible;
poudarja, da je takšna vključenost nenazadnje ključnega pomena za odgovorno upravljanje sredstev na operativnih ravneh in tudi, na primer, ključni element pri motiviranju enot, da si prizadevajo za učinkovite delovne prakse, ustvarjanje prihrankov, kjer je mogoče, sodelovanje z drugimi oddelki itd.;
Emphasises that such involvement, ultimately, is also key to responsible management of resources at the operational levels and, for example, also a key part in motivating units to look for efficient work practices, find savings when possible, co-operate with other departments etc;
meni, da je treba ABB/ABM razvijati tako, da se zagotovi večja preglednost in obrazložitev delitve odgovornosti med centralnimi in decentraliziranimi nalogami v Komisiji ter da se, še pomembneje, omogočijo jasne smernice glede številk in stroškov za osebje/vire, namenjene upravni podpori in usklajevalnim nalogam, vključno s podporo za cikel ABB/ABM, ter na ta način prispeva k pravemu ravnotežju med centralnim in decentraliziranim pristopom;
Considers that ABB-ABM must be developed in such a way that greater transparency and explanations concerning the division of responsibilities between central and decentralised functions in the Commission can be available and, importantly, provide clear guidance as to the numbers and costs for staff/resources devoted to administrative support and coordination functions including support for the ABB-ABM cycle itself and, in this way, contributing to finding the right balance between a centralised and decentralised approach;
poziva Komisijo, naj cikel SPP-ABM bolje vključi in poenostavi, tako da bo mogoče dejanske rezultate izvajanja politik in dejavnosti ustrezno upoštevati pri dodeljevanju človeških in finančnih virov; poudarja, da bi to moralo omogočiti tudi opredelitev morebitnih "negativnih prednostnih nalog";
Requests the Commission to better integrate and streamline the SPP-ABM cycle so that the actual results of the implementation of policies and activities can be taken into due consideration when allocating human and financial resources; emphasises that this should also result in the identification of possible "negative priorities";
meni, da si je treba bolj prizadevati, da bi se pri oblikovanju letne strategije politik sistematično upoštevali rezultati preteklih let, s tem bi prispevali tudi k zmanjšanju upravnega bremena Komisije;
Believes greater consideration should be given to making the Annual Policy Strategy an exercise by which the results of previous years are systematically taken into account, thereby also contributing to reducing the administrative burden on the Commission;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba poenostaviti in izboljšati tudi predstavitev vsebine ključnih dokumentov SPP-ABM, kot sta letno poročilo Komisije o dejavnostih in zbirno poročilo, da bi bolje ustrezali potrebam organa, pristojnega za sprejem proračuna in podeljevanje razrešnice;
Stresses that simplifications and improvements in presentation should also be made to the content of the SPP-ABM key documents, such as Commission's Annual Activity and Synthesis Reports, to make them better match the Budgetary and Discharge Authority's needs;
vztraja, da ta ukrep ne bi smel povzročiti povečane upravne delovne obremenitve; zato poziva Komisijo, naj opravi natančno analizo upravnih stroškov ciklusa SPP/ABM, da bi opredelila možne upravne poenostavitve, ter pozorno spremlja ustreznost dodeljevanja človeških virov, zlasti za dejavnost načrtovanja in dejavnost načrtovanja proračuna;
Insists that this move should not result in an increased administrative workload; asks the Commission therefore to carry out a detailed analysis of the administrative costs of the SPP-ABM cycle, in order to identify possible administrative simplifications, and to monitor closely the appropriateness of the allocation of human resources, especially to programming and budgeting activities;
poziva Komisijo, naj v naslednjem poročilu o pregledu poroča Parlamentu o rezultatih takšnih analiz kot tudi o opravljenih ukrepih in napredku glede zahtev iz te resolucije, in sicer pred prvo obravnavo proračuna za leto 2010 v Parlamentu;
Asks the Commission to report back to the Parliament on the results of such analyses in the next screening report, as well as on the actions implemented and progress made in respect of the requests made in this resolution before Parliament's first reading on Budget 2010;
meni, da bi bilo treba nameniti več poudarka opredelitvi meril kakovosti, s katerimi bi morali biti usklajeni podatki o uspešnosti;
Believes that more emphasis should be placed on establishing quality criteria to which performance information should comply;
nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvešča o sprejetih ukrepih za ocenjevanje ter izboljšanje organizacijske uspešnosti in učinkovitosti, predvsem glede razdelitve upravne podpore in nalog usklajevanja med centralno in operativno ravnjo v Komisiji;
Further asks the Commission to keep the Parliament informed of the actions taken to assess and improve organisational efficiency and effectiveness, particularly regarding the division of administrative support and coordination functions between central and operational levels within the Commission;
poudarja, da bi med letnimi poročili o dejavnostih, letno strategijo politik in predhodnim predlogom proračuna Komisije morala obstajati jasnejša povezava ter da bi si v večletnem obdobju morali prizadevati za uskladitev programskih in proračunskih dejavnosti z boljšo povezavo med večletnim finančnim okvirjem, strateškim načrtom Komisije in letno strategijo politik;
Stresses that there should be a clearer connection between AARs, APS and the Commission's PDB and that the alignment between programming and budgeting activities should be promoted with a multiannual perspective, through a better link between the MFF, the Commission's Strategic Plan and the APS;
meni, da bi te izboljšave spremenile ABB-ABM v učinkovit instrument v smislu proračuna, usmerjenega k rezultatom, ter znotraj Komisije povečale kulturo odgovornosti in obveznosti;
Considers that these improvements would make ABB-ABM an effective instrument in view of a budget for results and foster a culture of responsibility and accountability within the Commission;
meni, da bi Parlament moral pregledati, kako se uporabljajo podatki o uspešnosti, ki izhajajo iz dokumentov SPP/ABM, da bi okrepil svoj dialog s Komisijo;
Believes that Parliament should review how it uses the performance information from the SPP-ABM documents to strengthen its dialogue with the Commission;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2009 o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira 2007 – 2013 ( 2008/2055(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2009 on the Mid-Term Review of the 2007-2013 Financial Framework ( 2008/2055(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES, zlasti njenih členov 268 do 280,
having regard to the EC Treaty and in particular Articles 268 to 280 thereof,
ob upoštevanju potekajočega postopka ratifikacije Lizbonske pogodbe,
having regard to the ongoing ratification process of the Treaty of Lisbon,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. junija 2005 o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007–2013 UL C 124 E, 25.5.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 OJ C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 3. novembra 2008 o reformi proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi ( SEK(2008)2739 ),
having regard to the Commission working document of 3 November 2008 on Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe ( SEC(2008)2739 ),
ob upoštevanju konference z naslovom "Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi", ki jo je priredila Komisija dne 12. novembra 2008,
having regard to the results of the Conference on Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe hosted by the Commission on 12 November 2008,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 13. decembra 2007 o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2008 (vsi oddelki) UL C 323 E, 18.12.2008, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 13 December 2007 on the 2008 draft general budget of the European Union (all sections) OJ C 323 E, 18.12.2008, p.
in 18. decembra 2008 o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2009 (vsi oddelki) Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0622 .
and of 18 December 2008 on the 2009 draft general budget of the European Union (all sections) Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0622 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. marca 2007 o prihodnosti lastnih sredstev Evropske unije UL C 27 E, 31.1.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 March 2007 on the future of the European Union's own resources OJ C 27 E, 31.1.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. decembra 2007 o spremenjenem predlogu Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju v zvezi z večletnim finančnim okvirom UL C 323 E, 18.12.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 12 December 2007 on the amended proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management as regards the multiannual financial framework OJ C 323 E, 18.12.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 15. in 16. decembra 2005, 21. in 22. junija 2007 in 11. ter 12. decembra 2008,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Councils of 15-16 December 2005, 21-22 June 2007 and 11-12 December 2008,
– ob upoštevanju odgovora Evropskega računskega sodišča na sporočilo Komisije "Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi" ( SEK(2007)1188 ),
having regard to the response by the European Court of Auditors to the Commission's communication "Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe" ( SEC(2007)1188 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve, Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračunski nadzor, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbor za regionalni razvoj ter Odbora za kmetijstvo ( A6-0110/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgetary Control, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture ( A6-0110/2009 ),
ker so Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija sklenili Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006) po intenzivnih pogajanjih na podlagi pogajalskega stališča Evropskega parlamenta z dne 8. junija 2005, ki je temeljilo na poglobljeni analizi potreb, da bi se tako opredelile politične prednostne naloge, in na sporazumu, ki so ga sklenile države članice leta 2005,
whereas the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed on the IIA of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management ("IIA of 17 May 2006") following intense negotiations based on the European Parliament's negotiating position of 8 June 2005, which was based on an in-depth analysis of the needs in order to identify political priorities, and on the agreement achieved by the Member States in 2005,
ker Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 predvideva, da bo Komisija poročala o delovanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma do konca leta 2009, in poziva Komisijo, da opravi obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike odhodkov EU, vključno s Skupno kmetijsko politiko in viri, vključno s popustom Združenega kraljestva, in da poroča v obdobju 2008 – 2009,
whereas the IIA of 17 May 2006 provides that the Commission will report on the functioning of the IIA by the end of 2009 and invites the Commission to undertake a full wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the Common Agricultural Policy and resources, including the UK rebate, and to report in 2008-2009,
ker je Komisija septembra 2007 začela z obširnim javnim posvetovanjem, ki je zbralo več kot 300 prispevkov, in je 12. novembra 2008 priredila konferenco na temo Reforma proračuna v spreminjajoči se Evropi, ki je pomenila prvi korak postopka pregleda,
whereas the Commission launched a wide public consultation in September 2007, to which more than 300 contributions were made, and hosted a conference "Reforming the Budget, Changing Europe" on 12 November 2008 which marked the first step of the review process,
ker Komisija namerava predstaviti sporočilo, v katerem bodo predstavljene glavne smernice, ki bi morale določiti naslednji finančni okvir najkasneje jeseni 2009 in predstaviti poročilo o delovanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 (drugi korak postopka), medtem ko bo nova Komisija v letu 2010 pripravljala predloge za prihodnji večletni finančni okvir in Medinstitucionalni sporazum (tretji korak),
whereas the Commission intends to present a Communication outlining the main orientations that should design the next financial framework at the latest in Autumn 2009 and should present a report on the functioning of the IIA of 17 May 2006 (step two of the process) while the proposals for the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and IIA will be made by the next Commission (step three) in the course of 2010,
ker postopek ratifikacije Lizbonske pogodbe še ni zaključen,
whereas the ratification process of the Treaty of Lisbon is not yet completed,
ker je v finančnih določbah Lizbonske pogodbe predvideno, da bo imel večletni finančni okvir pravno zavezujoči značaj v okviru Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in bo trajal vsaj 5 let,
whereas the financial provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon provide that the MFF will have legally binding status under the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and have a duration of "at least 5 years",
ker je v Lizbonski pogodbi predvidena razširitev pristojnosti Evropske unije, posledice tega se bodo morebiti odražale v številu novih politik, za katere bomo potrebovali primerne pravne osnove in sredstva,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon provides for an extension of competences of the European Union, the consequences of which might be reflected in a number of new policies for which appropriate legal bases and financing might be necessary,
ker bi morale institucije zagotoviti, da bo časovni razpored naslednjega finančnega okvira omogočal demokratično legitimnost in bo kolikor mogoče ustrezal mandatu Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta, če se upošteva morebitno podaljšanje in prilagoditev večletnega finančnega okvira do 2015/2016,
whereas the institutions should ensure that the calendar of the next financial framework allows for democratic legitimacy and matching of the Commission and Parliament mandates as far as possible, considering a possible prolongation and adjustment of the current MFF until 2015/2016,
ker bi moralo biti imenovanje nove Komisije in s tem povezane predstavitve priložnost za na novo izvoljeni Parlament, da zasliši in oceni nove komisarje glede njihovih zadevnih političnih prednostnih nalog in oceni v ta namen potreben proračun,
whereas the designation of a new Commission and the hearings due to take place in this context should be an opportunity for the newly elected Parliament to question and evaluate the new Commissioners on their respective policy priorities and the budgets deemed necessary for that purpose,
ker bi moral vmesni pregled potekajočih zakonodajnih programov, predvidenih v obdobju 2010 – 2011, predstavljati glavni temelj za prihodnje preglede potekajočih programov in prihodnjih prednostnih nalog in ga je treba ustrezno upoštevati pri morebitnem podaljšanju in prilagoditvi trenutnega finančnega okvira do konca leta 2015/2016,
whereas the mid-term evaluation of the ongoing legislative programmes, due in 2010-2011, should represent a major basis for a future assessment of ongoing programmes and future priorities, and should be duly taken into account in the context of a possible prolongation and adjustment of the current financial framework until the end of 2015/2016,
opozarja, da je Parlament učinkovito prispeval k oblikovanju večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007 – 2013 in Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, medtem ko je istočasno omogočal neprekinjen potek zakonodaje Skupnosti prek sprožanja ogromnega števila večletnih programov; meni, da je večina priporočil iz poročila Parlamenta še vedno veljavnih, saj so temeljila na načelu od spodaj navzgor, ki je povezalo naloge in obljube s potrebnimi proračunskimi sredstvi; s tem v zvezi meni, da se morajo nekatera splošna načela in široke smernice, ki temeljijo na preteklih izkušnjah, prenesti na bodoči Parlament;
Recalls that Parliament has intensively contributed to the setting-up of the 2007-2013 MFF and IIA of 17 May 2006 while, in parallel, allowing the continuity of Community legislation through the launching of a huge number of multiannual programmes; thinks that most of the recommendations of the Parliament's report are still valid because they were based on a bottom-up approach that linked tasks and promises with the necessary budgetary means; in this context, is of the opinion that some broad principles and orientations based on past experience should be transmitted to the incoming Parliament;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za pripravo širokega in odprtega posvetovanja za iskanje novih idej in nastajajočih trendov; vendar opozarja, da se, v okviru institucionalnih pravic, ki jih uživa vsaka institucija, Parlament pooblasti, da poišče druge rešitve in razmisli o podlagi za posvetovanje in predstavitve, ki jih je sam načrtoval;
Welcomes the initiative taken by the Commission in organising a broad open consultation seeking to find new ideas and emerging trends; recalls, however, that, within the bounds of the institutional prerogatives which each institution enjoys, Parliament is entitled to explore other solutions and lines of thought on the basis of consultations and hearings it has planned itself;
meni, da je bil v zadnjih dveh letih, ki so sledila začetku veljave sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira (2007-2013) in Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, dosežen določen napredek na področju treh stebrov, ki jih je razvil Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 17. maja 2006 o sklenitvi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
Considers that, over the last two years following the entry into force of the current MFF (2007-2013) and of the IIA of 17 May 2006, some progress has been made on the three pillars developed by Parliament in its resolution of 17 May 2006 on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.