natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V kadrovskem načrtu varuha je trenutno 64 delovnih mest.
The Ombudsman’s establishment plan currently comprises 64 posts.
Za leto 2012 je varuh predvidel povišanje za 11 delovnih mest (7 AST in 4 AD).
For 2012 the Ombudsman foresees upgrades for 11 posts (7 AST and 4 AD).
Varuh v proračunu za leto 2012 ni zahteval novih delovnih mest.
In the budget for 2012, the Ombudsman requests no new posts.
V skladu z novo politiko usposabljanja, ki se je začela izvajati leta 2010, pa je varuh za leto 2012 zahteval povečanje sredstev za izobraževanje.
In line with the new training policy launched in 2010 the Ombudsman for 2012 requests an increase in appropriations for training.
Naslova II in III
Title II & III
Varuh v zvezi z nepremičninami za bližnjo prihodnost nima načrtov in namerava še naprej ohraniti v najemu pisarne Evropskega parlamenta v Strasbourgu in Bruslju za skupni znesek 488.000 EUR, kar je nekoliko več kot v letu 2010, ko je najemnina znašala 479.200 EUR.
As regards buildings the Ombudsman does not have any plans, in the near future, to change the current arrangements in which he rents offices in Strasbourg and Brussels from the European Parliament for a total amount of EUR 488,000 which is slightly up from EUR 479,200 in 2010.
Odhodki v naslovih II in III so se povečali za 0,77 % (+15.400 EUR).
The expenditure under Title II and III shows an increase of 0.77% (+ EUR 15,400).
Ta znesek je rezultat izračuna, po katerem so bili od skupnega povečanja v znesku 63.300 EUR odšteti prihranki v znesku 47.900 EUR.
This figure is the result of a total increase of EUR 63,300 which is offset by savings amounting to EUR 47,900.
Varuh nadaljuje svojo strategijo nadziranja vseh proračunskih vrstic, da bi poiskal možnosti za prihranke.
The Ombudsman is continuing his strategy of scrutinising all budget lines in order to identify and generate savings.
Institucija izvaja večletno perspektivo, kar ji omogoča načrtovanje projektov za več let, razporeditev potreb po sredstvih v daljšem obdobju, prerazporeditev sredstev med proračunskimi vrsticami in s tem ustvarjanje prihrankov.
The institution operates a multiannual perspective which allows it to schedule projects over several years, spread the need for appropriations, effect redeployments between budget lines and thus make savings.
Ta sistematični pristop je omogočil zmanjšanje 16 od skupno 23 proračunskih vrstic.
This systematic approach has led to decreases on sixteen budget lines out of a total of 23.
- Skupni znesek proračunskih sredstev, ki jih zahteva urad evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, zadostuje za izpolnjevanje vseh obveznosti in učinkovito opravljanje nalog.
- The total amount of budgetary resources as requested by the Ombudsman will enable him to meet his obligations and carry out his tasks effectively.
- Majhno povečanje načrtovanih proračunskih sredstev je glede na trenutne finančne in gospodarske razmere ustrezno, prav tako kot konsolidacija varuhovega kadrovskega načrta.
- The modest increase in the budget estimates is appropriate in view of the current financial and economic situation, as is the consolidation of the Ombudsman’s establishment plan.
- Politiko usposabljanja je treba nadaljevati in upravičuje zahtevano povečanje sredstev za izobraževanje.
- The training policy should be continued and justifies the requested increase in resources for training.
- Strategija večletne perspektive, prerazporeditev in sistematičnega nadzora proračunskih vrstic z namenom prihrankov se je izkazala za koristno in bi jo bilo treba nadaljevati.
- The strategy of using a multiannual perspective, redeployments and systematic scrutiny of budget lines in order to generate savings has proved to be productive and should be continued.
s priporočili Komisiji o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti v okviru prava družb EU
with recommendations to the Commission on insolvency proceedings in the context of EU company law
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE: PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA GLEDE VSEBINE ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA 7
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION: DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED 8
MNENJE Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ..................................17
OPINION of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ............19
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................20
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............22
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings
UL L 160, 30.6.2000, str.
OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p.
1. (uredba o insolventnosti),
1. (the Insolvency Regulation),
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropske unije z dne 2. maja 2006
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 2 May 2006
Zadeva C-444/07, MG Probud Gdynia sp. z o.o.
Case C-444/07 MG Probud Gdynia sp. z o.o.
(UL C 63, 13.3.2010, str.
(OJ C 63, 13.3.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7–0355/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A7-0355/2011 ),
A. ker neenakosti med nacionalnim insolvenčnim pravom povzročajo konkurenčne prednosti in/ali slabosti ali težave za družbe s čezmejnimi dejavnostmi, kar bi lahko oviralo uspešno prestrukturiranje insolventnih podjetij; ker te neenakosti spodbujajo izbiro najugodnejšega sodišča; ker bi enaki pogoji notranjemu trgu koristili;
A. whereas disparities between national insolvency laws create competitive advantages or disadvantages and difficulties for companies with cross-border activities which could become obstacles to a successful restructuring of insolvent companies; whereas those disparities favour forum-shopping; whereas the internal market would benefit from a level playing field;
B. ker je treba sprejeti ukrepe, da se preprečijo zlorabe, in vsakršno širjenje, pojava izbiranja najugodnejšega sodišča in ker bi bilo treba preprečiti potekanje več glavnih postopkov hkrati,
B. whereas steps must be taken to prevent abuse, and any spread, of the phenomenon of forum shopping, and whereas competing main proceedings should be avoided;
C. ker insolvenčnega materialnega prava na ravni EU sicer ni mogoče ustvariti, vseeno pa obstajajo področja insolvenčnega prava, na katerih je uskladitev možna in koristna;
C. whereas even if the creation of a body of substantive insolvency law at EU level is not possible, there are certain areas of insolvency law where harmonisation is worthwhile and achievable;
D. ker se nacionalno insolvenčno pravo v državah članicah postopoma zbližuje;
D. whereas there is a progressive convergence in the national insolvency laws of the Member States;
E. ker je bila leta 2000 sprejeta uredba o insolventnosti, ki velja že več kot devet let; ker bi morala Komisija najkasneje do 1. junija 2012 pripraviti poročilo o njenem izvajanju;
E. whereas the Insolvency Regulation was adopted in 2000 and has been now in force for more than nine years; whereas the Commission should present a report on its application no later than 1 June 2012;
F. ker je bila uredba o insolventnosti rezultat zelo dolgih pogajanj, zaradi česar so bila opuščena mnoga občutljiva področja, njen pristop k številnim vprašanjem pa je bil že v času sprejetja uredbe zastarel;
F. whereas the Insolvency Regulation was the outcome of a very lengthy negotiation process, the result of which is that many sensitive issues were left out and that its approach on a number of questions was already outdated at the moment of its adoption;
G. ker se je od začetka veljavnosti uredbe o insolventnosti marsikaj spremenilo, Uniji se je pridružilo 15 novih držav članic in se je izrazito povečalo število povezanih družb;
G. whereas since the entry into force of the Insolvency Regulation many changes have taken place, 15 new Member States have joined the Union and the phenomenon of groups of companies has increased enormously;
H. ker insolventnost negativno vpliva ne samo na prizadeta podjetja, temveč tudi na gospodarstvo držav članic, zaradi česar bi si bilo treba prizadevati, da bi vsak gospodarski subjekt, vsakega davkoplačevalca in delodajalca obvarovali pred posledicami insolventnosti,
H. whereas insolvency has an adverse impact not only on the businesses concerned but also on the economies of the Member States, and whereas the aim should therefore be to safeguard all economic stakeholders, taxpayers and employers against the repercussions of insolvency;
I. ker je pristop k postopku zaradi insolventnosti zdaj bolj usmerjen v reševanje podjetij kot alternativo za stečaj;
I. whereas the approach in relation to insolvency proceedings is now centred more on corporate rescue as an alternative to liquidation;
J. ker bi moralo biti insolvenčno pravo orodje za reševanje podjetij na ravni Unije; ker takšno reševanje, če je možno, koristi tako dolžniku kot upnikom in zaposlenim;
J. whereas insolvency law should be a tool for the rescue of companies at Union level; whereas such rescue, whenever it is possible, is to the benefit of the debtor, the creditors and the employees;
K. ker upniki ne smejo zlorabljati postopka zaradi insolventnosti, da bi se izognili rednemu postopku za povrnitev terjatev, in ker so zato potrebna ustrezna postopkovna varovala;
K. whereas insolvency proceedings should not be used abusively by a creditor to avoid joint action for the recovery of debts, and whereas it is therefore necessary to introduce appropriate procedural safeguards;
L. ker bi bilo treba sprejeti pravni okvir, ki bi bil bolj prirejen primerom začasne insolventnosti podjetij;
L. whereas a legal framework should be established that better suits cases of companies which are temporarily insolvent;
M. ker Komisija v sporočilu s 3. marca 2010 z naslovom Evropa 2020: Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ( KOM(2010)2020 ) ob navajanju vrzeli in ovir za dokončno vzpostavitev enotnega trga za 21. stoletje zapiše: „Izboljšati je treba dostop malih in srednjih podjetij do enotnega trga.
M. whereas in its Communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ (COM (2010) 2020), the Commission, referring to the missing links and bottlenecks obstructing the achievement of a single market for the 21st century, stated as follows: ‘Access for SMEs to the single market must be improved.
Podjetništvo moramo razvijati s konkretnimi pobudami v okviru politik, vključno s poenostavitvijo prava o gospodarskih družbah (stečajni postopki, statut zasebne družbe ipd.), ter pobudami, ki podjetnikom omogočajo nov začetek po neuspelih podvigih“;
Entrepreneurship must be developed by concrete policy initiatives, including a simplification of company law (bankruptcy procedures, private company statute, etc.), and initiatives allowing entrepreneurs to restart after failed businesses’;
N. ker bi moralo insolvenčno pravo določati tudi pravila za likvidacijo podjetja na čim bolj neškodljiv in ugoden način za vse udeležence, če se izkaže, da rešitev podjetja najbrž ne bo ali ni uspela;
N. whereas insolvency law should also lay down rules for the winding-up of a company in a way which is the least harmful and the most beneficial for all participants once it is established that the corporate rescue is likely to fail or has failed;
O. ker je treba v vsakem konkretnem primeru raziskati razloge za insolventnost podjetja, t. j. ugotoviti, ali so finančne težave podjetja prehodne, ali pa je podjetje popolnoma plačilno nesposobno; ker je v bistvu treba ugotoviti, kolikšno je celotno premoženje dolžnika in njegovih obveznosti, da bi lahko ocenili njegovo (ne)sposobnost plačevanja;
O. whereas in each specific case the reasons for the insolvency of a business must be investigated, i.e. it must be ascertained whether the business’s financial difficulties are merely transient or whether the business is completely insolvent; whereas what is fundamentally required is to establish all the assets of a debtor and his liabilities in order to be able to assess his solvency or insolvency;
P. ker so povezane družbe razširjen pojav, vendar se na ravni Unije vprašanje njihove insolventnosti še ni obravnavalo; ker obstaja velika možnost, da ima insolventnost povezanih družb glede na vsako posamezno članico skupine za posledico več ločenih postopkov zaradi insolventnosti v različnih pravnih redih; ker v primeru, da postopkov ni mogoče uskladiti, ni verjetno, da bi bilo mogoče skupino reorganizirati kot celoto, zato jo utegne biti potrebno razdeliti na sestavne dele, kar za upnike, zainteresirane strani in zaposlene pomeni izgubo;
P. whereas groups of companies are a common phenomenon but their insolvency has not yet been addressed at Union level; whereas the insolvency of a group of companies is likely to result in the commencement of multiple separate insolvency proceedings in different jurisdictions with respect to each of the insolvent group members; whereas unless those proceedings can be coordinated, it is unlikely that the group can be reorganised as a whole and it may have to be broken up into its constituent parts, with consequent losses for the creditors, shareholders and employees;
Q. ker je pri insolventnosti povezanih družb trenutno v EU težko izvesti sanacijo zaradi različnih predpisov držav članic, zaradi tega pa je ogroženih na tisoče delovnih mest;
Q. whereas where groups of companies become insolvent, a recovery is currently difficult to achieve in the EU, due to the differences in Member States’ rules, thus endangering thousands of jobs;
R. ker bi se lahko upniki, delničarji, delavci in sodišča s povezovanjem državnih registrov insolventnosti, kar bi privedlo do vzpostavitve dostopne in celovite podatkovne zbirke EU o postopkih zaradi insolventnosti, seznanili z začetkom postopka zaradi insolventnosti v drugi državi članici ter z roki in podrobnostmi o prijavljenih terjatvah; ker bi to spodbudilo stroškovno učinkovito upravo in povečalo preglednost, hkrati pa bi bilo upoštevano varovanje podatkov;
R. whereas the interlinking of national insolvency registers leading to the creation of a generally accessible and comprehensive EU database of insolvency proceedings would allow creditors, shareholders, employees and courts to determine whether insolvency proceedings have been opened in another Member State and to ascertain the deadlines and details for the presentation of claims; whereas this would promote cost-effective administration and increase transparency while respecting data protection;
S. ker bi morali biti čezmejni načrti izrednih ukrepov in reševanja (oporoke za časa življenja) za finančne ustanove pravno izvršljivi in bi jih bilo treba upoštevati za vse sistemsko pomembne družbe, tudi če niso finančne ustanove, saj so pomemben korak v postopku vzpostavljanja ustreznega čezmejnega okvira za insolventnost;
S. whereas cross-border ‘living wills’ should be legally enforceable in the case of financial institutions and should be considered for all systemically relevant corporations, even if they are not financial institutions, as an important step in the process of achieving an appropriate cross-border insolvency framework;
T. ker morajo določbe o postopkih zaradi insolventnosti dopuščati posebno ureditev za izločitev enot, ki so sposobne preživeti in ponujajo osnovne storitve, kot so plačilni sistemi in drugi mehanizmi, opredeljeni v „oporokah za časa življenja“, in ker bi morale države članice tudi zagotoviti, da so v njihove zakone o insolventnosti vnesene ustrezne določbe, sprejete na ravni EU z namenom, da se iz insolventnih čezmejnih konglomeratov ločijo enote, ki so sposobne preživeti;
T. whereas provisions for insolvency proceedings must allow special arrangements for separation of viable units that provide essential services, such as payment systems and other mechanisms defined in ‘living wills’ and whereas, in this respect, Member States should also ensure that their insolvency laws include adequate provisions allowing special arrangements at EU level for separation of insolvent cross-border conglomerates into viable units;
U. ker bi morali postopki zaradi insolventnosti upoštevati prenose znotraj skupin, da bi bila sredstva zaradi pravičnega rezultata po potrebi čezmejno izterljiva;
U. whereas insolvency proceedings should take account of intra-group transfers, with the aim of ensuring that, where appropriate, assets are recoverable across borders, in order to achieve an equitable result;
V. ker nekaterih investicijskih družb, zlasti zavarovalnic, ni mogoče razpustiti v trenutku in je potrebna rešitev, ki bo vodila v pravično postopno razporeditev premoženja; ker se prenosa poslovanja, prenehanja ali nadaljnjega delovanja ne sme preprečiti in je treba tem vprašanjem po potrebi dati prednost;
V. whereas some investment companies, particularly insurers, cannot be dissolved on a ‘snapshot’ basis and require an outcome that achieves an equitable distribution of assets over time; whereas transfer of business, run-off, or continuity of operation should not be prevented and may need to be prioritised;
W. ker bi morale biti odločitve o tem, da se v postopke zaradi insolventnosti vključijo tudi skupine in ne samo posamezni pravni subjekti, ciljno usmerjene v rezultate in bi morale upoštevati vse morebitne posledice, kot sta uporaba drugih reševalnih instrumentov ali učinek na jamstvene sheme, ki zajemajo različne blagovne znamke znotraj skupine;
W. whereas the decision to involve whole groups rather than single legal entities in insolvency proceedings should be outcome-oriented and should take account of any knock-on effects such as the triggering of other resolution tools or the effect on guarantee schemes that cover multiple brands within a group;
X. ker bi bilo primerno preučiti in opredeliti postopke za reševanje in standarde za čezmejne konglomerate, zlasti zamenjavo terjatev v lastniške deleže;
X. whereas it would be appropriate to explore the definition of harmonised bail-in procedures and standards for cross-border conglomerates, including in particular debt-to-equity swaps;
Y. ker je delovno pravo predvsem v pristojnosti držav članic, vendar pa lahko insolvenčno pravo vpliva nanj in je treba v obdobju povečane globalizacije in gospodarske krize vprašanje insolventnosti preučiti z vidika delovnega prava, saj različne opredelitve izrazov „zaposlitev“ in „zaposleni“ v državah članicah ni bi smele škoditi pravicam zaposlenih v primeru insolventnosti; ker razprava o specifičnem vprašanju insolventnosti vseeno ne more biti samodejna pretveza za urejanje delovnega prava na ravni EU;
Y. whereas although employment law is the responsibility of the Member States, insolvency law can have an impact on employment law, and whereas in the context of increasing globalisation – and, indeed, of the economic crisis – the issue of insolvency needs to be considered from an employment-law perspective, as differing definitions of ‘employment’ and ‘employee’ in Member States should not undermine the rights of employees in the event of insolvency; whereas, however, any debate on the specific issue of insolvency should not automatically be a pretext for regulating employment law at EU level;
Z. ker je Direktiva 2008/94/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o varstvu delavcev v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti delodajalca
Z. whereas the objective of Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer
UL L 283, 28.10.2008, str.
OJ L 283, 28.10.2008, p.
36. izpolnila zadani cilj, t.j. zagotoviti minimalno zaščito delavcev v primeru plačilne nesposobnosti delodajalca ob hkratni ustrezni prilagodljivosti za države članice; ker med državami članicami obstajajo razlike pri izvajanju in je zaradi njih potreben razmislek;
36. is to ensure a minimum degree of protection for employees in the event of insolvency, whilst maintaining adequate flexibility for Member States; whereas differences between Member States in terms of implementation do exist and those differences should be considered;
AA. ker Direktiva 2008/94/ES izrecno predvideva, da se v njeno področje uporabe vključijo delavci s krajšim delovnim časom, delavci a določen čas in začasni delavci; ker je treba za primer insolventnosti še bolj zaščititi delavce z netipičnimi pogodbami o zaposlitvi;
AA. whereas Directive 2008/94/EC explicitly includes in its scope part-time employees, employees with a fixed-term contract and employees with a temporary employment relationship; whereas greater protection in the event of insolvency should also be afforded to employees on non-standard contracts;
AB. ker trenutno razvrščanje upnikov ni usklajeno, zaradi česar je izid sodnih postopkov manj predvidljiv; ker je treba prednostno obravnavati terjatve delavcev v primerjavi z drugimi upniki;
AB. whereas the current lack of harmonisation with regard to the ranking of creditors reduces predictability of outcomes of judicial proceedings; whereas it is necessary to increase the priority of employees' claims relative to other creditors' claims;
AC. ker je področje uporabe Direktive 2008/94/ES, zlasti razumevanje pojma „neporavnane terjatve“, preširoko, saj številne države članice uporabljajo ozko opredelitev prejemkov (ki ne vključuje npr. odpravnine, dodatkov, povračila stroškov itd.), kar lahko povzroči, da znatni zahtevki ostanejo neporavnani;
AC. whereas the scope of Directive 2008/94/EC, in particular the understanding of ‘outstanding claim’, is too wide, as a number of Member States apply a narrow definition of remuneration (e.g. excluding severance pay, bonuses, reimbursement arrangements, etc.) that can result in substantial claims not being met;
AD. ker so države članice pristojne za opredelitev „nadomestil“ in „plačil“, če naj spoštujejo splošni načeli enakosti in nediskriminacije med delavci, kar pomeni, da morajo v vsakem primeru insolventnosti, ki je delavcem škodljiva, pri njihovih odškodninah upoštevati socialne cilje Direktive 2008/94/ES in najnižji znesek, ki ga je treba še določiti;
AD. whereas Member States are competent to define ‘remuneration’ and ‘pay’, provided that they adhere to the general principles of equality and non-discrimination between workers, with the result that any insolvency situation which is potentially prejudicial to the latter should be taken into account for the purposes of compensating them in accordance with the social objective of Directive 2008/94/EC and with threshold levels of compensation to be determined;
AE. ker je zaradi pogodb o zaposlitvi po EU in njihove raznolikosti v državah članicah trenutno nemogoče opredeliti „zaposlenega“ na evropski ravni;
AE. whereas, due to employment contracts across the EU and the diversity of such contracts within Member States, it is currently impossible to seek to define ‘employee’ at European level;
AF. ker bi se bilo treba kar najbolj izogibati izjemam glede področja uporabe Direktive 2008/94/ES;
AF. whereas exemptions from the scope of Directive 2008/94/EC should be avoided as far as possible;
AG. ker naj bi zakonodajni ukrep iz te resolucije, temeljil na podrobnih ocenah učinka, kot je to zahteval Parlament;
AG. whereas the legislative action requested in this resolution should be based on detailed impact assessments, as requested by Parliament;
Del 1: Priporočila glede uskladitve nekaterih vidikov insolvenčnega prava in prava gospodarskih družb
Part 1: Recommendations regarding the harmonisation of specific aspects of insolvency and company law
Priporočilo o uskladitvi nekaterih vidikov uvedbe postopkov zaradi insolventnosti
Recommendation on the harmonisation of certain aspects of the opening of insolvency proceedings
Evropski parlament predlaga uskladitev pogojev, pod katerimi je mogoče uvesti postopke zaradi insolventnosti.
The European Parliament proposes harmonisation of the conditions under which insolvency proceedings may be opened.