natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotovil, da je bilo v nasprotju z določbami finančne uredbe centra knjigovodstvo v letu 2005 vodeno brez upoštevanja metode dvostavnega knjigovodstva, kar je povzročalo tveganje napak;
noted that, contrary to the provisions of the Centre's financial regulation, its accounts were not kept in accordance with the double-entry method during 2005, thus creating a risk of error,
zahteva, da Računsko sodišče ali drug neodvisni revizor redno (in ad hoc) opravlja revizije uspešnosti agencij; meni, da se pri tem ne bi smeli omejiti na običajne dejavnike finančnega poslovodenja in pravilne uporabe javnega denarja, ampak bi morali vključiti tudi upravno učinkovitost in uspešnost ter oceno finančnega upravljanja vsake agencije;
7 Requests that the performance of the agencies be regularly (and on an ad hoc basis) audited by the Court of Auditors or another independent auditor; considers that this should not be limited to traditional elements of financial management and the proper use of public money, but should also cover administrative efficiency and effectiveness and should include a rating of the financial management of each agency;
ugotavlja, da so bile mnoge agencije tarča kritik, ker niso spoštovale pravil za javna naročila, Finančne uredbe, kadrovskih predpisov ipd., in opozarja na resnost te težave; meni, da je glavni razlog za takšno stanje dejstvo, da je večina predpisov, tudi Finančna uredba, sestavljenih za večje institucije, večina manjših agencij pa nima kritične mase, ki bi jim omogočala izpolnjevanje predpisanih zahtev; zato poziva Komisijo, naj poišče hitro rešitev in poveča učinkovitost z združitvijo upravnih funkcij različnih agencij, s čimer bi bila dosežena potrebna kritična masa (pri tem je treba upoštevati tudi potrebne spremembe v osnovnih predpisih, ki urejajo delovanje agencij in njihovo proračunsko samostojnost), ali pa čim prej pripravi osnutek specifičnih predpisov za agencije (zlasti izvedbena pravila za agencije), ki bi omogočali popolno izpolnjevanje zahtev;
Notes that it is a serious problem that a number of agencies is criticised for not following rules on public procurement, the Financial Regulation, the Staff Regulations, etc.; considers that the principal reason for this is that most regulations and the Financial Regulation are designed for bigger institutions and that most of the small agencies do not have the critical mass to be able to cope with these regulatory requirements; therefore asks the Commission to look for a rapid solution in order to enhance the effectiveness by grouping the administrative functions of various agencies together, in order to achieve this critical mass (taking into consideration the necessary changes in the basic regulations governing the agencies and their budgetary independence), or urgently to draft specific rules for the agencies (in particular implementing rules for the agencies) which allow them to be in full compliance;
opozarja na svoj sklep v zvezi z razrešnico za proračunsko leto 2005, v katerem je Komisijo pozval, naj vsakih pet let predloži študijo o dodani vrednosti za vse agencije; poziva ustrezne institucije, naj v primeru negativne ocene o dodani vrednosti agencije sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, tako da spremenijo mandat zadevne agencije ali pa jo zaprejo; ugotavlja, da Komisija v letu 2007 ni opravila niti enega ocenjevanja; vztraja pri tem, da bi morala Komisija pred podelitvijo razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2007 predložiti vsaj pet takšnih ocen, začenši z najstarejšimi agencijami;
Recalls its decision on discharge in respect of the financial year 2005, in which it invited the Commission to present every five years a study on the added value of every existing agency; invites all relevant institutions in the case of a negative evaluation of the added value of an agency to take the necessary steps by reformulating the mandate of that agency or by closing it; notes that there has not been one single evaluation undertaken by the Commission in 2007; insists that the Commission should present at least 5 such evaluations before the decision on discharge in respect of the financial year 2007, starting with the oldest agencies;
meni, da je treba čim prej upoštevati priporočila Računskega sodišča in uskladiti raven subvencij, izplačanih agencijam, z dejanskimi finančnimi potrebami; prav tako meni, da je treba predloge sprememb k splošni finančni uredbi vnesti tudi v okvirne finančne uredbe in posebne finančne uredbe agencij;
Is of opinion that recommendations of the Court of Auditors should be promptly implemented and the level of subsidies paid to the agencies should be aligned with their real cash requirements; considers further that the amendments to the general Financial Regulation should be incorporated into the agencies' framework financial regulation and into their various specific financial regulations;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 12. aprila 2005 Vse resolucije o agencijah so bile objavljene v UL L 196, 27.7.2005.
Recalls its resolution of 12 April 2005 All resolutions regarding the agencies were published in OJ L 196, 27.7.2005.
, v katerem so direktorji agencij pozvani, da od sedaj naprej k letnemu poročilu o dejavnosti, predstavljenemu skupaj s finančnimi podatki in podatki o upravljanju, priložijo izjavo o zanesljivosti glede zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovanja, ki je podobna izjavam, ki jih podpišejo generalni direktorji Komisije;
, inviting the Directors of the Agencies from now on to accompany their annual activity report, which is presented together with financial and management information, with a declaration of assurance concerning the legality and regularity of operations, similar to the declarations signed by the Directors-General of the Commission;
), da črpanje subvencij, ki jih Komisija izplačuje iz proračuna Skupnosti, ne poteka na osnovi ustrezno utemeljenih ocen denarnih potreb agencij ter da to v povezavi z izdatnimi prenosi sredstev povzroča, da imajo agencije veliko likvidnih sredstev na računu; seznanjen je tudi s priporočilom Računskega sodišča, da bi morala biti raven izplačanih subvencij agencijam v skladu z njihovimi resničnimi denarnimi potrebami;
) that the disbursement of subsidies paid by the Commission from the Community budget is not based on sufficiently justified estimates of the agencies' cash requirements and that this, combined with the size of carry-overs, leads them to hold sizeable cash balances; notes further the Court's recommendation that the level of subsidies paid to the agencies should be in line with their real cash requirements;
upošteva pripombo sodišča (letno poročilo, odstavek 1.25) glede vračunanih stroškov za neizkoriščeni dopust, ki so jih obračunale nekatere agencije; opozarja, da je Računsko sodišče podalo izjavo o zanesljivosti v primeru treh agencij (Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja (CEDEFOP), Evropska policijska akademija (CEPOL) in Evropska agencija za železniški promet za proračunsko leto 2006 (2005: CEDEFOP, Evropska agencija za varnost hrane, Evropska agencija za obnovo);
Notes the Court's remark (Annual Report, paragraph 1.25) concerning accrued charges for untaken leave which are accounted for by some agencies; points out that the Court of Auditors has qualified its statement of assurance in the case of three agencies (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP), CEPOL and the European Railway Agency) for the financial year 2006 (2005: CEDEFOP, European Food Safety Authority, European Agency for Reconstruction);
opozarja na pridržek notranjega revizorja v letnem poročilu o dejavnosti za leto 2006, ki pravi,
Draws attention to the reservation entered in the Internal Auditor's Annual Activity Report for 2006 as follows:
"Notranji revizor Komisije ne more zadovoljivo izpolnjevati svoje obveznosti notranjega revizorja organov Skupnosti iz člena 185 Finančne uredbe zaradi pomanjkanja osebja.";
The Internal Auditor of the Commission is not in a position to properly fulfil his obligation assigned by Article 185 of the Financial Regulation as internal auditor of the Community bodies due to a lack of staff resources.
je seznanjen z naraščajočim številom regulativnih in izvajalskih agencij ter skupnih podjetij, ki jih mora služba za notranjo revizijo revidirati v skladu s členom 185 Finančne uredbe, narašča; poziva Komisijo, naj pristojni odbor obvesti, ali bo imela služba za notranjo revizijo v prihodnjih letih na voljo dovolj kadrov za izvajanje letne revizije vseh takih organov;
Notes the ever-growing number of regulatory and executive agencies and joint undertakings required to be audited by the IAS under Article 185 Financial Regulation; asks the Commission to inform its competent committee as to whether the staff resources at the IAS's disposal will be sufficient to conduct an annual audit of all such bodies in the coming years;
ugotavlja, da člen 72(5) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 zahteva, da vsaka agencija organu za razrešnice in Komisiji vsako leto predloži poročilo, ki ga pripravi njen direktor in v katerem so povzeti število in vrsta notranjih revizij, ki jih je opravil notranji revizor, njegova priporočila in ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti v zvezi s temi priporočili; poziva agencije, naj navedejo, ali se to izvaja, in če se, na kakšen način;
Observes that Article 72(5) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 requires each agency to send each year to the discharge authority and the Commission a report drawn up by its director summarising the number and type of internal audits conducted by the internal auditor, the recommendations made and the action taken on these recommendations; asks the agencies to indicate whether this is done and, if so, how;
, ki je bila dogovorjena na usklajevanju pred Ekonomsko-finančnim svetom za proračun dne 13. julija 2007 in ki zahteva (i) seznam agencij, ki jih Komisija namerava oceniti, in (ii) seznam že ocenjenih agencij, skupaj s povzetkom pomembnejših ugotovitev;
negotiated at the conciliation before the ECOFIN budget Council of 13 July 2007 calling for (i) a list of agencies which the Commission intends to assess, and (ii) a list of the agencies already assessed, together with a summary of the major findings;
ugotavlja, da imajo posamezne agencije zaradi svoje velikosti težave pri ustanavljanju ad hoc disciplinskih komisij, ki jih sestavljajo uslužbenci iz ustreznih kariernih razredov, in da preiskovalni in disciplinski urad Komisije (IDOC) ni pristojen za agencije; poziva agencije, naj premislijo o medagencijski disciplinski komisiji;
Notes that, because of their size, individual agencies have difficulty in setting up ad hoc disciplinary boards composed of staff at the appropriate career grade and that the Commission's IDOC (Investigation and Disciplinary Office) is not competent for agencies; calls on the agencies to consider an inter-agency disciplinary board;
opozarja na osnutek Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije, ki ga je predložila Komisija ( KOM(2005)0059 ), katerega namen je oblikovanje horizontalnega okvira za oblikovanje, strukturo, delovanje, ocenjevanje in nadzor evropskih regulativnih agencij; ugotavlja, da je osnutek koristna pobuda pri prizadevanju za racionalizacijo ustanavljanja in vodenja agencij; upošteva izjavo Komisije v zbirnem poročilu 2006 (odstavek 3.1, KOM(2007)0274 ), da so bile razprave o zadevi obnovljene na zasedanju Sveta ob koncu leta 2006, čeprav je napredek pri pogajanjih po objavi osnutka zastal; obžaluje, da pri sprejemanju ni bilo mogoče doseči napredka;
Recalls the draft Interinstitutional Agreement on the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies presented by the Commission ( COM(2005)0059 ), which was intended to create a horizontal framework for the creation, structure, operation, evaluation and control of the European regulatory agencies; notes that the draft represents a useful initiative in the effort to rationalise the creation and running of agencies; notes the statement in the Commission's 2006 synthesis report (paragraph 3.1, COM(2007)0274 ) that although progress in negotiations stalled after publication of the draft, discussions on substance were relaunched in the Council at the end of 2006; regrets that it has not been possible to make further progress towards adoption;
meni, da je Evropski center za preprečevanje in obvladovanje bolezni pomembna institucija pri krepitvi in razvoju evropskega nadzora nad boleznimi, sistema zgodnjega opozarjanja in verodostojnih znanstvenih mnenj o tveganjih, ki jih pomenijo nove in pojavljajoče se nalezljive bolezni; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je center v letu 2006 razvil veliko število proizvodov in storitev, da bi izpolnil svoj mandat;
Considers the Centre to be an important institution for the strengthening and development of European disease surveillance, early warning systems and authoritative scientific opinions on risks posed by new and emerging infectious diseases; notes with satisfaction that the Centre was able to develop a considerable number of products and services in 2006, so as to fulfil its mandate;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo poročila Računskega sodišča za leto 2006, da je bilo prenesenih skoraj 45 % obveznosti, sprejetih med letom, in da je bilo v drugi polovici leta 2006 opravljenih veliko prenosov, v glavnem zaradi nenatančnih ocen kadrovskih potreb, ne da bi bil upravni odbor centra o njih pravočasno obveščen;
Notes the Court of Auditors' observation in its 2006 report that nearly 45 % of the commitments entered into during the year were carried over, and that during the second half of 2006, numerous transfers were made, due mainly to imprecise estimates of staffing needs, without the Centre's Management Board having been informed in due time;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad ugotovitvami Računskega sodišča, da so bile pravne obveznosti znova sprejete brez predhodnih proračunskih obveznosti, kar je v nasprotju s Finančno uredbo;
Expresses concern at the Court's finding that once again legal commitments were entered into in the absence of prior budgetary commitments, in breach of the Financial Regulation;
poziva center, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe v zvezi z ugotovitvijo Računskega sodišča, da pravice dostopa do računalniškega sistema za upravljanje proračuna niso bile vedno v skladu s pristojnostmi, ki jih je dodelil direktor, ter da računovodja še ni potrdil glavnih postopkov za prevzem obveznosti in za plačila;
Invites the Centre to take the necessary steps to deal with the Court's observation that rights of access to the computerised budget management system were not always consistent with the authorisations granted by the Director and that the accounting officer has not yet validated the main commitment and payment procedures;
je seznanjen z naslednjimi odgovori centra:
Notes the Centre's replies indicating that
za odpravo ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti ter izboljšanje sistemov notranje kontrole so bile vzpostavljene notranje zmogljivosti in sprejeti določeni ukrepi;
internal capacities have been established and measures taken to address the identified weaknesses, as well to improve the internal control systems;
center je imenoval uradnika za varnost finančnih sistemov (SI2) in vzpostavil zmogljivosti za izvedbo notranje revizije;
the Centre has appointed a financial systems (SI2) security officer and set up an internal audit capability;
na podlagi izkaza poslovnega izida centra ugotavlja, da je s prihodkom 15,8 milijona EUR center dosegel poslovni rezultat 5,3 milijona EUR s skupno gotovino na računu v višini 7,2 milijona EUR, medtem ko bilanca stanja vključuje 400.000 EUR za vnaprejšnje financiranje, ki jih je treba vrniti Komisiji;
Notes from the Centre's economic outturn account that in 2006 on the basis of revenue of EUR 15,8 million it achieved an economic result of EUR 5,3 million, with total cash in the bank of EUR 7,2 million, and that the balance sheet includes EUR 400 000 for pre-financing to be returned to the Commission;
opozarja, da se je proračun centra povečal s 4,53 milijona EUR v letu 2005 na 17,15 milijona EUR v letu 2006, število zaposlenih pa s 43 na 85; ugotavlja, da je poleg Računskega sodišča revizijo centra v maju 2006 opravila tudi služba za notranjo revizijo Komisije, na podlagi katere je nastal akcijski načrt, leta 2006 pa je center ustanovil revizijski odbor;
Recalls that the Centre's budget grew from EUR 4,53 million in 2005 to EUR 17,15 million in 2006, with an increase in staff from 43 to 85; notes that, in addition to the audit by the Court of Auditors, the Centre was audited by the IAS of the Commission in May 2006, resulting in an action plan, and that in 2006 the Centre established an audit committee;
pozdravlja vključitev 24 standardov notranjega nadzora v letno poročilo centra; meni, da bi bilo koristno, če bi to storile vse agencije;
Welcomes the inclusion in the Centre's annual report of the 24 internal control standards; takes the view that this is an example which could usefully be followed by all agencies.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 22 April 2008 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju zaključnega letnega računa Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006 UL C 261, 31.10.2007, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006 OJ C 261, 31.10.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Računskega sodišča o zaključnem letnem računu Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006 z odgovori Centra UL C 309, 19.12.2007, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006, together with the Centre's replies OJ C 309, 19.12.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1920/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o Evropskem centru za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami UL L 376, 27.12.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1920/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p.
ter zlasti člena 15 Uredbe,
, and in particular Article 15 thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0116/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0116/2008 ),
podeli razrešnico direktorju Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami glede izvrševanja proračuna centra za proračunsko leto 2006;
Grants the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre's budget for the financial year 2006;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in resolucijo, ki je del sklepa, posreduje direktorju Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 o zaključku poslovnih knjig Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 22 April 2008 on the closure of the accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
ugotavlja, da je zaključni letni račun Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami taki, kot v prilogi k poročilu Računskega sodišča;
Notes that the final annual accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction are as annexed to the Court of Auditors' report;
odobri zaključek poslovnih knjig Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006;
Approves the closure of the accounts of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep posreduje direktorju Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami, Svetu, Komisiji in Računskemu sodišču ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za proračunsko leto 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 22 April 2008 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the financial year 2006 ( C6-0375/2007 – 2007/2050(DEC) )
ker je Računsko sodišče navedlo, da je prejelo zadostno zagotovilo o zanesljivosti letnega računa za proračunsko leto 2006 ter o zakonitosti in pravilnosti z njimi povezanih transakcij;
whereas the Court of Auditors stated that it has obtained reasonable assurance that the annual accounts for the financial year 2006 are reliable, and the underlying transactions are legal and regular,
ker je Parlament 24. aprila 2007 direktorju Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami podelil razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna centra za proračunsko leto 2005 UL L 187, 15.7.2008, str.
whereas on 24 April 2007 Parliament granted the Director of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction discharge in respect of the implementation of the Centre's budget for the financial year 2005 OJ L 187, 15.7.2008, p.
ugotovil, da upravni odhodki kažejo visoko stopnjo prenesenih sredstev, tj. skoraj 40%; pozval center k boljšemu upravljanju politike javnih naročil, da bi se izognil prenosu sredstev;
noted that expenditure on administration showed a high carry-over rate of almost 40 %; invited the Centre to manage its procurement policy better, in order to avoid carrying over appropriations;
ugotovil pomanjkljivosti pri zaposlovanju osebja in pri postopkih glede službenih potovanj ter pozval center k pravilni uporabi teh postopkov;
noted deficiencies in staff recruitment and mission procedures and invited the Centre to apply those procedures correctly;
opozoril na različna odstopanja, ki so bila odkrita pri preverjanju postopkov za naročila in sklepanje pogodb;
noted that a number of anomalies were revealed in the course of checks on procurement and contracting procedures;
pozval center, da sisteme za vodenje osnovnih sredstev vključi v splošno računovodstvo, ker brez zanesljivega sistema označevanja ni mogoče zagotoviti sledljivosti sredstev, vodenih v evidenci;
invited the Centre to include the fixed asset inventory systems in the general accounts, as in the absence of a reliable labelling system, the traceability of assets entered in the inventory cannot be assured,