natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva sektor, naj poveča svoje pobude, v povezavi s Komisijo in zakonodajalci, če jih za to prosi sektor, za razvoj operativnega, standardiziranega in doslednega evropskega modela za obdelavo skladov v varnem okolju, s čimer bi se omogočilo zmanjšanje stroškov; meni, da bi to vodilo k razvoju enotnih skupnih standardov;
Calls on the industry to step up its own initiatives, in coordination with the Commission and regulators if called on by the industry, to develop an operational, standardised and consistent European model for fund processing in a secure environment, thereby making it possible to reduce costs; suggests that this would lead to the development of uniform common standards;
podpira večjo uporabo elektronske obdelave skladov prek vzpostavitve skupnih standardov;
Supports the greater use of electronic fund processing through the creation of common standards;
ugotavlja, da velikost in število evropskih skladov nista optimalna in da bi večja konsolidacija vlagateljem prinesla nižje stroške in/ali višje neto dobičke; ugotavlja tudi, da bi bila večja prilagodljivost in boljša kakovost produktov, predvsem s ciljem večje čezmejne konkurence v skladu z evropskim konkurenčnim pravom, koristna;
Notes that the size and number of European funds is sub-optimal and that greater consolidation would bring lower costs and/or higher net returns for investors; notes also that greater flexibility and higher product quality, especially aiming at more cross-border competition in accordance with European competition law would be beneficial;
meni, da pooblastila niso vedno optimalna rešitev zaradi dodatnih stroškov za lokalne zaposlene in ker določenih nalog ni mogoče prenesti;
Does not consider that delegation is the optimum solution in all cases because of the additional costs of local employees and the fact that certain functions cannot be delegated;
o čezmejnem združevanju delniških družb in 90/434/EGS UL L 225, 20.8.1990, str.
and 90/434/EEC OJ L 225, 20.8.1990, p.
o obdavčenju združevanj;
on taxation of mergers;
ugotavlja, da bi sektor rad razvil čezmejna skupna vlaganja, ki bi imela za izhodišče obstoječe nacionalne izkušnje, kot na primer domača združevanja v glavni sklad v Španiji, Franciji in Luksemburgu, vendar vnaprej opozarja, da morajo biti skupni stroški (vključno s stroški obremenitve) jasno prikazani vlagatelju;
Notes that the industry would like to develop cross-border pooling starting from existing national experiences, such as, for instance, domestic master-feeder structures in France, Spain and Luxembourg, but anticipates that the total costs (including load fees) of such arrangements must be made clear to the investor;
poziva CESR in CEIOPS, da si prizadevata za večjo ureditveno zbliževanje na področju skupnih vlaganj in meni, da je na področju pokojnin nujno sodelovanje med odbori;
Calls on the CESR and the CEIOPS to work towards greater regulatory convergence in pooling and considers that in the field of pensions, cooperation between the Committees is necessary;
opozarja, da je potrebna sprememba Direktive 85/611/EGS, da bi omogočili združevanje v glavni sklad;
Points out that an amendment to Directive 85/611/EEC is necessary to allow master-feeder structures;
poudarja, da bosta možni obe vrsti skupnih vlaganj (vlaganja v pravno osebo in virtualna vlaganja); potreben je dialog nadzornih organov, da lahko skupna vlaganja učinkovito delujejo;
Stresses that both kinds of pooling (entity pooling and virtual pooling) must be possible and that a dialogue of supervisory authorities is necessary to enable pooling to function effectively;
vseeno izpostavlja, da bi se bilo treba poleg na uskladitev davkov osredotočiti tudi na zagotavljanje zbliževanja splošnih zakonodajnih in ureditvenih pogojev in da ukrepi za čezmejno združevanje ne bi smeli imeti za posledico majhnega števila velikih družb za upravljanje v prevladujočem položaju, ki izkrivljajo konkurenco;
Points out, however, that, alongside tax harmonisation, the focus should be on ensuring the convergence of the general legislative and regulatory conditions and that measures for cross-border consolidation should not be allowed to result in a small number of large management companies in a dominant position distorting competition;
načeloma pozdravlja nastanek odprte strukture s pomočjo konkurenčnih distribucijskih kanalov;
Welcomes, in principle, the creation of an open architecture through competing channels of distribution;
spodbuja sektor, da nadalje razvije neposredno distribucijo prek interneta, vendar z ustreznim varovanjem vlagateljev;
Encourages the industry to develop further direct distribution via the Internet but with appropriate investor safeguards;
vendar obžaluje, da v številnih državah članicah distribucija in prodaja pogosto ostajata lokalni z zelo omejeno konkurenco;
Regrets, however, that in a number of Member States, distribution and sales often remain locally based, with very limited competition;
ima zadržke glede določanja cen, njihove preglednosti (glede stroškov distribucije) in stroškov, ki jih naložijo distributerji za sklade tretje stranke, ter poziva Komisijo, naj to razišče z vidika konkurence; meni, da bi bilo treba ta pogoj razširiti na vse finančne produkte, ki se jih prodaja vlagateljem na drobno, da se prepreči, da distributerji uporabijo nepoštene cene;
Has reservations concerning the fixing of prices, their transparency in terms of distribution costs and the charges imposed by distributors for third-party funds, and calls on the Commission to investigate this from a competition law perspective; considers that this requirement should be extended to all financial products which are sold to retail investors in order to prevent distributors from applying unfair prices;
zagovarja enotna pravila za distribucijo in svetovanje pri vsakem produktu, ki bo prodan malim vlagateljem; zlasti bi moral distributer kupcu razkriti stroške vrednostne verige; ponovno izpostavlja, da bi morale vse zahteve po razkritju veljati ne le za KNPVP, temveč tudi za vse konkurenčne produkte; predlaga, da se funkcije upravljanja premoženja, skupnih vlaganj in distribucije, pa tudi vsi stroški in takse, ki so s tem povezani, jasno opredelijo in razkrijejo stranki;
Advocates uniform rules on distribution and advice on each product sold to small investors; in particular the distributor should disclose value chain costs to the client; points out, once again, that all disclosure requirements should apply not only to UCITS but equally to all competing products; suggests that the functions of asset management, pooling and distribution, as well as all related costs and fees, must be clearly defined and disclosed to the client;
meni, da se morajo naložbe, ki so primerne za KNPVP, obvezno razširiti in prilagoditi nastalim spremembam in inovacijam na trgu ter da so predmet enotne definicije na evropski ravni;
Considers it to be essential that the investments eligible for UCITS should be extended and adapted in line with changes and innovations in the market and should be subject to a uniform pan-European definition;
meni, da bi bilo treba vlagatelje obveščati o spremembah v investicijski sestavi, ki ne sledi predhodno dogovorjeni strateški razporeditvi sredstev; meni, da bi bilo treba stranki razkriti spodbude, prejete od tretjih strank;
Believes that investors should be informed if there is a change in investment structure, that does not respect the strategic allocation of the fund assets previously defined; considers that inducements received from third parties need to be disclosed to the client;
izpostavlja, da bi ta podatek moral pokrivati tudi vse spremembe v tveganju, kateremu je izpostavljen vlagatelj kot posledica prestrukturiranja;
Points out that information given to investors should also cover any changes in the risks to which the investor is exposed as the result of restructuring;
pozdravlja svetovanje CESR o primernih sredstvih za vlaganje KNPVP in podpira vključitev nepremičninskih skladov, ki kotirajo na borzi, zasebnih kapitalskih skladov in certifikatov med primerno premoženje za vlaganje, ter poziva Komisijo, naj z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi preuči, ali je možno brez primarne zakonodaje doseči predpis na tej osnovi; vseeno obžaluje, da so hedge skladi ostali zunaj pooblastil CESR; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali bi bilo treba v področje uporabe Direktive 85/611/EGS vključiti določbo s tem učinkom; poudarja, da KNPVP mora nadaljevati z izpolnjevanjem zahtev obvladovanja tveganj, ki jih določata tako direktiva kot tudi Priporočilo Komisije 2004/383/EC UL L 144, 30.4.2004, str.
Welcomes the CESR advice on eligible assets for investments of UCITS and supports the inclusion of listed real estate investment trusts, private equity funds and certificates among the eligible assets for investment and calls on the Commission to examine with all stakeholders whether a provision on the basis thereof can be achieved without primary legislation; regrets, however, that funds of hedge funds have remained outside the CESR mandate; calls on the Commission to examine whether a provision to this effect should be incorporated into the scheme of Directive 85/611/EEC; stresses that UCITS must continue to fulfil the risk-management requirements set out in the directive as well as Commission Recommendation 2004/383/EC OJ L 144, 30.4.2004, p.
o uporabi izvedenih finančnih instrumentov za KNPVP, medtem ko vodi k skupnim praksam obvladovanja tveganj;
on the use of financial derivative instruments for UCITS while leading to common risk management practices;
Razprava: naložbe zunaj KNPVP
Excursus: Non-UCITS investments
ugotavlja, da nepremičninski sklad, hedge sklad, krovni hedge sklad, zasebni kapitalski skladi, certifikati in pokojninski sklad ne spadajo v Direktivo 85/611/EGS, hkrati pa ugotavlja, da se vlaganje v njih povečuje;
Notes that although real estate investment funds, hedge funds, funds of hedge funds, private equity funds, certificates, and pension funds do not fall within the scope of the Directive 85/611/EEC, they are becoming increasingly popular types of investment;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z nadzorovanjem stanja glede vlaganj izven KNPVP in naj v bližnji prihodnosti obvesti Parlament o prednostih in drugih učinkih urejanja za vlagatelje, ki so primerni za taka vlaganja, vključno s pozornostjo naslednjim ukrepom: na eni strani, vzpostavitev vseevropskega režima zasebne prodaje in izvedba študije o mehanizmih, ki povzročajo, da so taki produkti primerni za vlaganja na drobno, ko to postane zaželeno, ter na drugi strani, vzpostavitev vseevropskega okvira za posredna vlaganja v nepremičnine;
Calls on the Commission to continue to monitor the situation with regard to non-UCITS investments and to inform the Parliament in the very near future of the advantages and other effects of regulation for suitable investors in such investments, including consideration of the following measures: on the one hand, the creation of a pan-European private placement regime and a study concerning the mechanism for making such products eligible for retail investment when this becomes desirable, and, on the other, the establishment of a pan-European framework for indirect investments in real estate;
poziva države članice, da v skladu z direktivo o pokojninskem skladu omogoči celotni ali delni prenos funkcij upravljanja premoženja pokojninskega sklada na druga podjetja;
Calls on the Member States, in accordance with the pension fund directive, to permit the full or partial transfer of the asset management function of pension funds to other undertakings;
opozarja na pomen skladnega prenosa in izvajanja zakonodaje ES ter tako imenovanih odborov tretje stopnje ter njihovega medsebojnega sodelovanja;
Draws attention to the importance of the coherent transposition and implementation of EC legislation, of the Level-3 committees, and of cooperation between them;
prosi nacionalne nadzorne organe, da tesneje sodelujejo, zlasti da zagotovijo dostop do informacij nadzornim organom iz drugih držav članic, in opozarja na pomen regulativne arbitraže; ugotavlja, da je to izjemnega pomena, predvsem zaradi predvidene rasti čezmejne prodaje produktov skladov neprofesionalnim vlagateljem, širitve elektronskega trženja in svetovalnih kanalov ter interesa, ki ga je izrazil sektor skladov in njihovih finančnih partnerjev v sektorje bančništva in zavarovalništva v vseevropskem potnem listu družb za upravljanje;
Asks the national supervisory authorities to cooperate more closely, in particular to ensure access to information for supervisory authorities from other Member States and draws attention to the importance of regulatory arbitrage; notes that this is of considerable importance, particularly because of the anticipated growth in cross-border sales of fund products to non-professional investors, the expansion of electronic marketing and advisory channels and the interest expressed by the fund industry and its financial partners in the banking and insurance sectors in a pan-EU management company passport;
priznava, da glede na pozitivne izkušnje že prenesenih direktiv, kot na primer direktivi 2003/6/ES UL L 96, 12.4.2003, str.
Recognises that, based on the successful experience of directives already transposed, such as Directives 2003/6/EC OJ L 96, 12.4.2003, p.
o prospektu, ima pristop Lamfalussy pomembno vlogo pri izboljšanju in zagotovitvi učinkovitega in doslednega izvrševanja ukrepov v vsej EU;
on the prospectus, the Lamfalussy approach has, in many areas, been playing an important role in improving and ensuring an effective and consistent implementation of measures throughout the EU;
izpostavlja, da bi bilo koristno, če bi se tako imenovani odbori 3. stopnje bolj držali načel enostavnosti, jasnosti in izvedljivosti in bi razvili več medsebojnih skupnih metod;
Points out that it would be beneficial if the Level 3 committees adhered more closely to the principles of simplicity, clarity and practicability and developed more common methods among themselves;
ugotavlja, da ob sprejetju Direktive 85/611/EGS postopek Lamfalussy še ni obstajal in da zaradi obstoječe natančne zakonodaje sprememba navedene direktive v popolno direktivo tipa Lamfalussy brez celovitega pregleda in prestrukturiranja direktive ni možna; meni, da to v tem trenutku ni smiselno, vendar pa je vredno premisleka, če kratkoročni ukrepi ne bi učinkovali;
Notes that the Lamfalussy process did not exist when Directive 85/611/EEC was adopted, and that, because of the detailed legislation currently in force, Directive 85/611/EEC cannot be transformed into a Lamfalussy-style directive without being completely revised and restructured; does not consider this to be appropriate at present but believes that it would be worth considering if measures taken in the near future are not effective;
pozdravlja, da se že uporabljajo nekateri mehanizmi, ki so podobni postopku Lamfalussy, na primer postopek posvetovanja in sodelovanja vseh zainteresiranih strani ter zbliževanje najboljše prakse, in priporoča, naj bodo zakonodajne spremembe Direktive 85/611/EGS, kakor je bila spremenjena s KNPVP III, skladne s postopkom Lamfalussy;
Welcomes the fact that some Lamfalussy-style mechanisms are already being applied, for instance the consultation and cooperation of all stakeholders and the convergence of best practices, and recommends, as a practical solution, that legislative amendments to Directive 85/611/EEC, as amended by UCITS III, should be compliant with Lamfalussy;
spodbuja Svet in Komisijo, naj za vse stranke zadovoljivo skleneta tekoča pogajanja o komitologiji, da podeli Parlamentu popolno pravico preklica v vseh postopkih komitologije, ki so povezani s postopkom soodločanja; meni, da je sklenitev takega dogovora predpogoj za nadaljevanje postopka Lamfalussy; ponovno poudarja, da bodo določbe o časovni omejitvi glede ključnih direktiv o finančnih storitvah, kot so MiFID in bodoče preoblikovane direktive o kreditnih institucijah in kapitalski ustreznosti investicijskih družb in kreditnih institucij začele učinkovati 1. aprila 2008, če do tega dne Parlamentu ne bo dodeljena popolna pravica preklica;
Encourages the Council and the Commission to conclude, in a satisfactory manner for all parties, the current negotiations on comitology so as to give the Parliament full call-back rights in all comitology procedures related to codecision procedures; considers that the conclusion of such an agreement is a precondition for the continuance of the Lamfalussy process;. recalls that sunset clauses as regards key financial services directives such as MiFID and the forthcoming recast directives on credit institutions and capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions will become effective on 1 April 2008 if no full call-back right is given to the Parliament before that date;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sektorskih vidikih akcijskega načrta državne pomoči: pomoč za inovacije ( 2006/2044(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on sectoral aspects of the State Aid Action Plan: aid for innovation ( 2006/2044(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. septembra 2005 z naslovom "Dokument o posvetovanju o državni pomoči za inovacije" ( KOM(2005)0436 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 21 September 2005 entitled, 'Consultation Document on State Aid for Innovation' ( COM(2005)0436 ),
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta državnih pomoči Komisije: Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005-2009 z dne 7. junija 2005 ( KOM(2005)0107 ),
having regard to the Commission's State aid action plan, Less and better-targeted State aid: a roadmap for State aid reform 2005-2009 of 7 June 2005 ( COM(2005)0107 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. februarja 2006 o reformi državnih pomoči 2005-2009
having regard to its resolution of 14 February 2006 on State aid reform 2005-2009
Sprejeta besedila
Texts adopted,
ob upoštevanju osnutka sporočila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2005 z naslovom "Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013" UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
having regard to the draft Commission Communication of 21 December 2005 entitled, 'Guidelines on National Regional Aid for 2007-2013' OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
Sporočilo, kakor je bilo nazadnje spremenjeno s sporočilom Komisije v zvezi s podaljšanjem Okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj (UL C 310, 8.12.2005, str.
5 as last amended by the Commission communication concerning the prolongation of the Community Framework for State Aid for Research and Development, OJ C 310, 8.12.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju rezultatov industrijskih naložb EU v raziskave in razvoj (R&R) iz 2005 Objavila Komisija dne 9.12.2005.
having regard to the 2005 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard Published by the Commission on 9.12.2005.
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o državni pomoči in rizičnem kapitalu UL C 235, 21.8.2001, str.
having regard to the Commission Communication on State aid and risk capital OJ C 235, 21.8.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. oktobra 2005 z naslovom "Več raziskav in inovacij – naložbe za rast in zaposlovanje: skupni pristop" ( KOM(2005)0488 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 12 October 2005 entitled, 'More Research and Innovation - Investing for Growth and Employment: A Common Approach' ( COM(2005)0488 ),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 z dne 5. decembra 2002 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči na področju zaposlovanja UL L 337, 13.12.2002, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 5 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju ciljev Lizbonske strategije,
having regard to the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy,
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 5, 81, 82, 87, 88 in 163 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 2, 5, 81, 82, 87, 88 and 163 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0073/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0073/2006 ),
ker EU namerava zmanjšati splošno raven državne pomoči in jo prerazporediti v korist horizontalnih ciljev,
whereas the EU aims to reduce the general level of State aid and redeploy it in favour of horizontal objectives,
ker je raven inovacij v EU nižja od optimalne in zaostaja za svojimi trgovskimi partnerji tako na področju naložb v R&R, kakor tudi na področju rasti produktivnosti; ker je treba obrniti trend "bega možganov" in tok naložb, ki sedaj poteka v smeri iz EU v druge dele sveta,
whereas the level of innovation in the EU is sub-optimal and lags behind its trading partners as regards both R&D investment and productivity growth; whereas the trend of the 'brain drain' and the investment flow from the EU to other parts of the world should be reversed,
ker v primeru inovacij ter R&R horizontalna pomoč obstaja na področju, ki je življenjskega pomena za konkurenčnost EU, ter na področju, na katerem naši konkurenti dajejo na razpolago bistveno več državne pomoči od tiste, ki je dovoljena v EU,
whereas in the case of innovation and R&D, horizontal aid exists in a field which is vital to the EU's competitiveness and one in which our competitors provide substantially more State aid than is permitted in the EU,
ker inovacijski postopki rabijo prostor za razvoj in preizkušanje,
whereas innovation processes need scope for development and room for experimentation,
ker je vrzel inovacijskih dosežkov med EU in njenimi svetovnimi konkurenti posledica dejavnikov, kot so majhne javne in zasebne naložbe v R&R, nezadostno število usposobljenih delavcev in zaviralni dejavniki v patentnih predpisih EU,
whereas the innovation performance gap between the EU and its global competitors is due to factors such as low public and private investment in R&D, an insufficient number of skilled workers, and disincentives inherent in EU rules on patents,
ker je javna podpora med dejavniki, ki vplivajo na odločitve o naložbah pri R&R, nizko uvrščena; ker se pomen neposredne javne podpore v različnih državah članicah lahko zelo razlikuje od ene države članice do druge in je eden izmed dejavnikov, ki jih podjetja morajo upoštevati pri svojih naložbenih odločitvah v R&R, ki ga ne bi smeli osamiti od poslovnega okolja, ki je naklonjen R&R ter bi moral biti predmet urejanja pravil ES o konkurenci,
whereas public support ranks very low among the factors influencing investment decisions in R&D; whereas the significance of direct public support varies considerably from one Member State to another and is one of the factors taken into account by enterprises for their investment decisions in R&D, which should not be isolated from an R&D-favourable business environment and should be subject to EC competition rules,
ker politika inovacij na področju R&R predstavlja izrazito majhen delež nacionalnih proračunov in BDP-ja držav članic, kar je tudi dejavnik, ki pripomore k zastoju pri izvrševanju ciljev lizbonske strategije in doseganju ciljev povečanja zaposlitve in kohezije,
whereas innovation policy in the fields of technology and R&D accounts for a manifestly small proportion of Member States' national budgets and GDP, which is in turn a factor that contributes to the delay in implementing the Lisbon Strategy objectives and achieving the goals of boosting employment and cohesion,
ker mora državna pomoč ostati izjema, sredstvo za popravo neravnovesij, ki se jih ni možno lotiti z običajnimi političnimi instrumenti, in ker nizka raven naložb v R&R zahteva obsežnejši politični pristop,
whereas State aid should remain the exception, an instrument to correct imbalances that cannot be addressed by regular policy instruments, and whereas the low level of investment in R&D requires a more comprehensive policy approach,