natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi preglednosti sprejema odločitve o uradnem nasprotovanju standardom v konsolidirani in javno dostopni obliki ter da na voljo posodobljeno tabelo dejavnosti v zvezi z uradnim nasprotovanjem; Komisijo poziva tudi, naj predstavi letno poročilo o standardizacijskih mandatih in o napredku pri njihovem izpolnjevanju;
Asks the Commission, for the sake of transparency, to make decisions on formal objections to standards public in a consolidated way, and make available an updated table of all actions in relation to formal objections; calls also on the Commission to present an annual report on the standardisation mandates and the progress on their fulfilment;
poziva evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, naj okrepijo svoje pritožbene mehanizme, ki so namenjeni uporabi v primeru nestrinjanja o standardu; ugotavlja, da sedanji mehanizmi morda niso vedno učinkoviti, saj njihova sestava v praksi odraža stališče tistih, ki so standard potrdili; zato predlaga razširitev sodelujočih na zunanje neodvisne strokovnjake in/ali evropske socialne interesne skupine, ki so pridruženi člani ali sodelujoči partnerji evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo;
Invites the ESOs to reinforce their existing appeal mechanisms which are meant to be used should a disagreement over a standard arise; notes that the current mechanisms may not always be effective as their composition reflects in practice the position of those that approved a standard; proposes, therefore, enlarging the composition to enable the participation of external independent experts and/or European societal stakeholders that are currently associate members or cooperating partners of the ESOs;
izraža podporo prostovoljni evropski certifikacijski oznaki Keymark, ki je v lasti Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo/Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki in dokazuje skladnost z evropskimi standardi; poudarja, da je Keymark dragocena nadomestna možnost za različne nacionalne sheme certificiranja, katerih posledica je mnogovrstno testiranje in označevanje proizvodov v več državah članicah, zaradi česar lahko postanejo ovira za trgovino na notranjem trgu in povzročijo znatne stroške za majhne družbe, ki se lahko odražajo v višjih cenah za potrošnika; zato spodbuja nacionalne organe za standarde in drugi nacionalne organe za certificiranje, naj spodbujajo Keymark kot nadomestno možnost za sheme nacionalnega certificiranja; poziva tudi k vseevropski obveščevalni kampanji, da bi povečali poznavanje koristi oznake Keymark med podjetji in potrošniki;
Expresses its support for the Keymark, a voluntary European certification mark, owned by CEN/CENELEC, which demonstrates compliance with European standards; stresses that the Keymark is a valuable alternative to the various national certification schemes that entail multiple testing and marking of products in several Member States and can therefore become a barrier to trade within the Internal Market and cause significant costs for small companies that may be reflected in higher prices for the consumer; encourages, therefore, national standards bodies, and other national certification bodies, to promote the Keymark as an alternative to national certification schemes; calls also for a pan-European information campaign in order to raise awareness amongst businesses and consumers about the benefits of the Keymark;
se zaveda, da sedanji sistem financiranja EU v podporo evropski standardizaciji pogosto povzroča nezadovoljstvo zaradi sprememb pravil, visoke cene revizij in zamud pri odobritvah plačil; poudarja, da je treba nujno zmanjšati te stroške in veliko upravno breme, ki včasih presega koristi zagotovljene finančne podpore, hkrati pa spoštovati finančne predpise EU; poziva Komisijo in vse interesne skupine, naj zagotovijo finančno vzdržnost evropskega sistema, vključno z javno-zasebnimi partnerstvi in večletnim finančnim načrtovanjem, ki je bistveno za zagotovitev uspešnosti in učinkovitosti v globalni konkurenci; meni, da bi lahko Komisija in evropske organizacije za standardizacijo bolje sodelovale, da bi zagotovile trden in uporabniku prijazen okvir za finančne prispevke EU k evropski standardizaciji, kar bo znatno povečalo učinkovitost sistema;
Is aware that the current system of EU funding in support of European standardisation often leads to frustration in terms of rule changes, the high cost of auditing and delays in the authorisation of payments; stresses that there is an urgent need to reduce these costs and the high administrative burden that at times outweigh the benefits of the financial support provided, while respecting EU financial rules; calls on the Commission and all stakeholders to ensure the financial sustainability of the system, including through public-private partnerships and through multiannual financial planning, which is essential to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency in global competition; considers that the Commission and the ESOs could improve their cooperation in order to guarantee a stable and user-friendly framework for the EU financial contribution to European standardisation which will increase significantly the efficiency of the system;
priznava načelo nacionalnih delegacij kot temelj evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, zlasti pri postopku razvoja standardov Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo in Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki; vendar ugotavlja, da – kot je bilo potrjeno v študiji o dostopu do standardizacije – v veliki večini evropskih držav socialne interesne skupine pri oblikovanju standardov sodelujejo zelo malo ali pa sploh ne;
Recognises the principle of national delegation as a cornerstone of the European standardisation system, particularly in the standards-development process of CEN and CENELEC; notes, however, that – as confirmed in the study on access to standardisation – in the vast majority of European countries societal stakeholders participate very little, or not at all, in the standard-setting process;
spodbuja evropske in nacionalne organe za standardizacijo, naj spodbujajo in omogočajo učinkovito sodelovanje vseh zainteresiranih strani v standardizacijskem postopku, zlasti predstavnikov malih in srednjih podjetij ter vseh interesnih skupin, ki zastopajo javne interese, na primer potrošnikov (vključno z invalidi in ranljivimi potrošniki), okoljevarstvenikov ter delavcev in organov, ki zastopajo druge družbene interese;
Encourages European and national standardisation bodies, therefore, to promote and facilitate effective participation in the standardisation process by all interested parties, in particular representatives of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and all stakeholders representing the public interest such as consumers (including people with disabilities and vulnerable consumers), environmentalists, workers and bodies representing other societal interests;
poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj razišče vzroke za slabo udeležbo socialnih interesnih skupin ter malih in srednjih podjetij na nacionalni ravni ter po potrebi spodbuja ukrepe za države članice, ki bodo tem skupinam in podjetjem zagotovili dostop do nacionalnega standardizacijskega postopka; pozdravlja prizadevanja Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo/Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki ter nacionalnih standardizacijskih organov pri izvajanju „zbirke 58 priporočil“ iz študije dostopnosti za mala in srednja podjetja ter priporočil iz poročila skupine EXPRESS v zvezi z izboljšanjem dostopa za vse interesne skupine;
Calls also on the Commission to investigate the reasons for the low level of societal stakeholder and SME participation at national level and, where appropriate, to promote measures for the Member States which will give societal stakeholders and SMEs better access to the national standardisation process; welcomes the efforts of CEN/CENELEC and national standards bodies (NSBs) in implementing the ‘Toolbox of 58 recommendations’ of the study on SME access to standardisation and the recommendations of the EXPRESS Report with a view to improving access for all stakeholders;
poudarja potrebo po zagotovitvi neposredne udeležbe socialnih interesnih skupin na evropski ravni, ki je priznana že od devetdesetih let prejšnjega stoletja, da bila njihova stališča učinkoviteje izražena, saj je njihovo zastopstvo v nacionalnih tehničnih odborih v večini držav članic še vedno šibko; glede na to, da je bil pri povečevanju udeležbe socialnih interesnih skupin na nacionalni ravni dosežen zelo majhen uspeh, potrjuje, da je treba finančno in politično podporo evropskim organizacijam, ustanovljenim za zastopanje teh interesnih skupin, ohraniti in krepiti vsaj še v obdobju do leta 2020; poziva te organizacije, naj prevzamejo vidnejšo vlogo pri zagotavljanju nasvetov državam članicam in nacionalnim združenjem interesnih skupin, zato da bi okrepili sodelovanje ustreznih interesnih skupin na nacionalni ravni;
Stresses the need, which has been recognised since the 1990s, to ensure direct participation by societal stakeholders at European level in order to reflect their views more effectively, given that their representation on national technical committees in most Member States remains weak; affirms that, as very limited success has been achieved in increasing societal stakeholder participation at national level, financial and political support for the European organisations established to represent such stakeholders needs to be maintained and strengthened at least in the period to 2020; calls on those organisations to play a prominent role in providing advice to Member States and national stakeholder associations with a view to strengthening the participation of the respective stakeholders at national level;
meni, da bi bilo treba tem evropskim organizacijam, ki zastopajo družbene interese, dodeliti močnejšo vlogo v evropskih organizacijah za standardizacijo; zato poziva Komisijo in evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, naj spodbujajo različne ukrepe za uresničitev tega cilja, kar brez poseganja v načelo nacionalnih delegacij zajema tudi organizacije z dejanskim članstvom, a brez glasovalnih pravic v evropskih organizacijah za standardizacijo, pod pogojem, da so pridružene članice ali sodelujoče partnerice; meni, da bi morali imeti nacionalni organi za standarde ključno vlogo pri spodbujanju in krepitvi sodelovanja socialnih interesnih skupin v postopku standardizacije, saj ima prednost načelo nacionalnih delegacij;
Holds the view that these European organisations representing societal interests must obtain a stronger role within the ESOs; calls therefore on the Commission and the ESOs to promote different measures to achieve this purpose, including, without prejudice to the national delegation principle, providing those organisations with an effective membership, but without voting rights, within the ESOs, on condition that they are associate members or cooperating partners; considers also that the NSBs must play a key role in promoting and reinforcing the participation of societal stakeholders in the standardisation process, given the primacy of the national delegation principle;
je seznanjen z nedavnim razvojem v Mednarodni organizaciji za standardizacijo, zlasti z modelom, uporabljenim za razvoj standarda ISO 26000 za družbeno odgovornost, v katerem so nacionalni organi za standarde v delovno skupino lahko imenovali samo po enega predstavnika iz vsake od šestih opredeljenih kategorij interesnih skupin (industrija, potrošniki, vlada, delavci, nevladne organizacije in dodatna kategorija (storitve, podpora, raziskave in drugo); vztraja, da bi morale evropske organizacije za standardizacijo in Komisija ob sodelovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi temeljito oceniti uporabo podobnega modela kot nadomestno možnost za pripravo standardov na področjih izrednega javnega interesa ter da bi morale o ugotovitvah te ocene poročati Parlamentu; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga način financiranja, s katerim bi podprli tak nadomestni model;
Notes recent developments in the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), in particular the model used to develop the ISO 26000 standard on social responsibility, in which NSBs were entitled to nominate to the respective working group only one representative from each of six stakeholder categories (industry, consumers, government, labour, NGO, SSRO (service, support, research and others)) that were identified; maintains that the use of a similar model should be thoroughly assessed by the ESOs and the Commission, in cooperation with all interested parties, as an alternative for the drafting of standards in areas of exceptional public interest, and that the findings of this assessment should be reported to Parliament; invites the Commission to propose financial means to support such an alternative model;
poudarja, da so nacionalni organi za standarde sicer bistveni element evropskega standardizacijskega sistema, vendar med njimi obstajajo številne razlike glede sredstev, strokovnih izkušenj in znanja ter udeleženosti interesnih skupin v standardizacijskem postopku; poudarja, da zaradi obstoječih neenakosti nastaja veliko neravnovesje v njihovi učinkoviti udeležbi v evropskem standardizacijskem sistemu, pri čemer lahko omejeni viri nekaterih nacionalnih organov za standarde ovirajo njihovo učinkovito vključevanje v proces oblikovanja standardov;
Points out that, although NSBs constitute a core element in the European standardisation system, there are significant differences among them in terms of resources, technical expertise and stakeholder engagement in the standardisation process; stresses that the existing inequalities create a significant imbalance in their effective participation in the European standardisation system, while limited resources in some NSBs may hamper their effective involvement in the standard-setting process;
poziva Komisijo in evropske organizacije za standardizacijo, naj spodbujajo programe usposabljanja in sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi šibkejši nacionalni organi za standarde, ki zaenkrat še nimajo sekretariatov tehničnih odborov ali ne sodelujejo pri evropski standardizaciji na ravni, ki bi bila sorazmerna z njihovo ekonomsko strukturo, prevzeli dejavnejšo vlogo v standardizacijskem postopku, zato da bi povečali zaupanje v notranji trg in zagotovili enake pogoje za vse udeležence; meni, da so programi usposabljanja potrebni tudi za mala in srednja podjetja, zato da bi povečali njihovo udeležbo pri procesu oblikovanja standardov ter povečali pomembnost standardizacije kot strateškega poslovnega orodja;
Asks the Commission and the ESOs to promote training programmes and to take all measures needed to enable weaker NSBs, which do not currently run technical-committee secretariats, or do not participate in European standardisation at a level commensurate with their economic structure, to assume a more active role in the standardisation process, in order to enhance confidence in the internal market and ensure a level playing field; considers that training programmes are also necessary for the SMEs in order to increase their participation in the standard-setting process and raise the importance of standardisation as a strategic business tool;
pozdravlja pobudo Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo in Evropskega odbora za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki za uvedbo postopka medsebojnega strokovnega ocenjevanja, s katerim bi ovrednotili, ali nacionalni organi za standarde pravilno uporabljajo načela (in dodatne oznake) Svetovne trgovinske organizacije ter spodbudili stalno izboljševanje in izmenjavo dobre prakse; poudarja, da mora ta projekt služiti kot učinkovito orodje za krepitev nacionalnih organov za standarde in boljšo udeležbo vseh ustreznih interesnih skupin na nacionalni ravni; meni, da morajo pri tem projektu sodelovati vsi nacionalni organi za standarde, podprt pa mora biti z neodvisnimi revizijami; poziva Evropski odbor za standardizacijo in Evropski odbor za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki, naj pripravita in objavita poročilo o rezultatih postopka medsebojnega strokovnega ocenjevanja;
Commends the initiative of CEN and CENELEC to introduce a peer assessment process in order to evaluate the correct application by the NSBs of the WTO principles (and additional attributes) and to encourage continuous improvement and exchange of good practice; stresses that this project should serve as an effective tool for the strengthening of the NSBs and the improved participation of all relevant stakeholders at national level; believes that this project should involve all NSBs and be underpinned by independent audits; invites CEN and CENELEC to prepare and make publicly available a report on the results of the peer assessment process;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo učinkovito zastopanje vseh pomembnih interesnih skupin v nacionalnih tehničnih odborih, in sicer tako, da vzpostavijo mehanizme za spremljanje in poročanje ter zagotovijo usposabljanje in finančno podporo za šibkejše socialne interesne skupine in po potrebi tudi za združenja malih in srednjih ter obrtniških podjetij, zato da bi zagotovile njihovo dejansko udeležbo; poudarja, kako pomembno je zagotavljanje digitalnega dostopa uporabnikom do informacij o standardih;
Urges Member States to ensure effective representation of all relevant stakeholders on national technical committees by establishing monitoring and reporting mechanisms and providing training and financial support to weaker societal stakeholders, and, where appropriate, to federations of SMEs and craft enterprises, in order to ensure their effective participation; stresses the importance of providing digital access to users on information about standards;
poziva evropske organizacije za standardizacijo in države članice, naj Komisiji redno zagotavljajo poročila o napredku glede njihovih dejavnosti za zagotovitev ustrezne zastopanosti vseh interesnih skupin v tehničnih organih, odgovornih za razvoj mandatiranih standardov, ki morajo temeljiti na posebnih zahtevah glede poročanja; poudarja, da je treba ta poročila naknadno vključiti v poročilo Komisije o prizadevanjih evropskih in nacionalnih organizacij za standardizacijo in doseženih rezultatih;
Calls on the ESOs and Member States to provide periodically to the Commission a progress report on their actions to ensure appropriate representation of all stakeholders in the technical bodies responsible for the development of mandated standards, which should be based on specific reporting requirements; stresses that these reports should subsequently feed into a Commission report on the efforts undertaken by the European and national standardisation organisations and the results achieved;
poziva nacionalne organe za standarde, naj šibkejšim interesnim skupinam zagotovijo prost dostop do odborov za standardizacijo in razvijejo orodja za izboljšanje udeležbe interesnih skupin, vključno z brezplačnim spletnim mehanizmom za posvetovanje za vse nove predloge standardov, ki ga bo enostavno uporabljati; spodbuja te organe, naj v celoti izkoristijo informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (IKT), da bi okrepili sodelovanje interesnih skupin prek spletnih sestankov in razprav; poleg tega spodbuja nacionalne organe za standarde, naj zagotovijo komunikacijo onkraj omejitev sistema, zlasti za javne poizvedbe o novih standardih, glede na to, da so javne poizvedbe navadno usmerjene na sedanje udeležence v sistemu;
Invites NSBs to provide free access to standardisation committees for the weaker stakeholders and develop tools to improve stakeholder involvement, including a free-of-charge, easy-to-use online consultation mechanism for all new standards proposals; encourages those organisations to make full use of information and communication technologies (ICT) to strengthen stakeholder participation through web-based meetings and online discussion; encourages also NSBs to ensure communication beyond the system boundaries, especially for public enquiries on new standards, given that public enquiries are usually directed at the current participants of the system;
obžaluje, da javni organi v večini držav članic kažejo omejeno zanimanje za udeležbo pri postopku razvijanja standardov, ne glede na pomembnost standardizacije kot orodja za podporo zakonodaji in javnim politikam; poziva države članice – kot predstavnice interesov državljanov – še posebej pa organe za nadzor trga, naj pošljejo predstavnike, ki bodo sodelovali v vseh nacionalnih tehničnih odborih, ki odražajo razvoj standardov v podporo politikam in zakonodaji EU; poudarja, da je udeležba nacionalnih organov v razpravi o razvoju standardov bistvena za pravilno delovanje zakonodaje na področjih, ki jih zajema novi pristop, ter za preprečitev naknadnega uradnega nasprotovanja usklajenim standardom;
Regrets that public authorities in most Member States show limited interest in participating in the standards-development process, notwithstanding the importance of standardisation as a tool to support legislation and public policies; urges Member States – as the representatives of the interests of the citizens – and in particular market surveillance authorities to send representatives to take part in all national technical committees mirroring the development of standards in support of EU policies and legislation; stresses that the presence of national authorities in the debate on standards development is crucial for the proper functioning of legislation in the areas covered by the ‘New Approach’, and for the avoidance of ex-post formal objections to harmonised standards;
poziva nacionalne organe za standarde, naj zaradi poštene konkurence na notranjem trgu sledijo kodeksu etike Mednarodne organizacije za standardizacijo, da bi zagotovili, da druge dejavnosti, na primer certificiranje in akreditacija, ne bodo ogrožale nepristranskosti standardov; poleg tega poudarja pomen oblikovanja standardov in navodil za oceno skladnosti ter spodbujanja njihovega sprejetja in poštene uporabe, zlasti v zvezi z zahtevami o integriteti, objektivnosti in nepristranskosti;
Calls on NSBs, in the interests of fair competition in the internal market, to follow the ISO Code of Ethics, in order to ensure that the impartiality of standards is not endangered by other activities such as certification or accreditation; stresses also the importance of developing standards and guides for conformity assessment and promoting their adoption and fair use, in particular as far as requirements for integrity, objectivity and impartiality are concerned;
priznava, da evropska standardizacija pomaga ustvarjati enake pogoje za vse udeležence na trgu, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, ki so glavni steber evropskega gospodarstva in bistveno prispevajo k sistemu; priznava pa tudi, da njihova udeležba pri standardizaciji ni vedno sorazmerna z njihovim gospodarskim pomenom, pri čemer lahko zapletenost in stroški standardov pomenijo oviro za mala in srednja podjetja;
Recognises that European standardisation helps create a level playing-field for all market actors, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, which form the backbone of the European economy and are vital contributors to the system; acknowledges, however, that their involvement in standardisation is not always commensurate with their economic importance, whereas the complexity and cost of standards can represent an obstacle to SMEs;