natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kadar se namerava pristojni odredbodajalec na podlagi prenosa odpovedati ali delno odpovedati izterjavi ugotovljene terjatve, zagotovi, da je odpoved pravilna ter v skladu z načelom dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in sorazmernosti.
Where the competent authorising officer by delegation is planning to waive or partially waive recovery of an established amount receivable, he/she shall ensure that the waiver is in order and complies with the principle of sound financial management and proportionality.
Odločitev o odpovedi izterjave mora biti utemeljena in evidentirana v poročilih o letnih dejavnostih iz člena 63(9).
The waiver decision must be substantiated and shall be presented in the annual activity reports referred to in Article 63(9) .
Odredbodajalec lahko prenese pooblastilo za tako odločitev.
The authorising officer may delegate the decision.
Odgovorni odredbodajalec lahko v celoti ali delno razveljavi ugotovljeno terjatev v skladu s pogoji iz delegirane uredbe iz člena 199 .
The responsible authorising officer may cancel an established amount receivable in full or in part in accordance with the conditions set out in the delegated Regulation referred to in Article 199 .
Delna razveljavitev ugotovljene terjatve ne pomeni, da se Unija odpoveduje ugotovljeni upravičenosti.
The partial cancellation of an established amount receivable does not imply a waiver of a Union’s established entitlement.
Pristojni odredbodajalec lahko v celoti ali delno razveljavi ugotovljeno terjatev.
The competent authorising officer may cancel an established amount receivable in full or in part.
Delna razveljavitev ugotovljene terjatve ne pomeni, da se Unija odpoveduje ugotovljeni upravičenosti.
The partial cancellation of an established amount receivable does not imply a waiver of a Union ’s established entitlement.
Poslovnik in merila za odločitev o odpovedi izterjatve ter njen prenos s strani odredbodajalca in ukinitev ugotovljenega zneka se določi v delegirani uredbi iz člena 199.
The rules for the procedures and criteria of a waiver decision as well as the delegation thereof by the authorising officer and the cancellation of an established amount shall be laid down in the delegated regulation referred to Article 199.
Namen tega predloga spremembe je uskladiti pravila za izterjavo.
The amendment aims at streamlining the rules for recoveries.
Temelji na členu 32 Uredbe 1290/2005 (o skupni kmetijski politiki).
It is based on Article 32 of Regulation 1290/2005 (on the Common Agricultural Policy).
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 a (novo)
Article 77 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Zneski, ki jih izterjajo države članice zaradi nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti, in pripadajoče obresti, se nakažejo organu upravljanja, ki jih vknjižijo kot prihodke, za mesec, ko je bil denar dejansko prejet.
Sums recovered by the Member States following the occurrence of irregularity or negligence and the interest on these sums shall be made over to the managing authority and booked by it as revenue in the month in which the money is actually received.
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 b (novo)
Article 77 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Ob nakazovanju v proračun Unije lahko država članica za pavšalno povračilo stroškov izterjave zadrži 20 % ustreznega zneska, razen zneskov, ki se izterjajo zaradi nepravilnosti ali malomarnosti upravnih organov ali drugih uradnih organov.
When the Union budget is credited, the Member State may retain 20 % of the corresponding amounts as flat rate recovery costs, except in cases of irregularity or negligence attributable to its administrative authorities or other official bodies.
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 c (novo)
Article 77 – paragraph 2 c (new)
V utemeljenih primerih se lahko države članice odločijo, da ne bodo izvajale postopka izterjave.
If there is justification for doing so, Member States may decide not to pursue recovery.
Ta odločitev se lahko sprejme le v naslednjih primerih:
A decision to this effect may be taken only in the following cases:
(a) če je skupna vsota že obstoječih in predvidenih stroškov izterjave višja od zneska izterjave;
(a) if the costs already and likely to be incurred total more than the amount to be recovered, or
(b) če izterjave ni mogoče izvršiti zaradi plačilne nesposobnosti dolžnika ali oseb, ki so sodno odgovorne za nepravilnost, pri čemer je plačilna nesposobnost ugotovljena in priznana v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo zadevne države članice.
(b) if recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity.
Temelji na členu 32 Uredbe 1290/2005 (o skupni kmetijski politiki).
It is based on Article 32 regulation 1290/2005 (on the Common Agricultural Policy).
Člen 77 a (novo)
Article 77 a (new)
Člen 77a
Article 77a
Finančni popravki držav članic v sistemu skupnega upravljanja iz naslova II dela 2
Financial corrections by Member States in shared management under Title II of Part 2
Države članice so predvsem odgovorne za preiskovanje nepravilnosti na podlagi dokazov o večji spremembi, ki vpliva na naravo ali okoliščine izvajanja ali nadzor poslovanja ali operativnih programov iz nalova II dela 2, in izvedbo potrebnih finančnih popravkov skladno z odstavki 2 do 4.
The Member States shall in the first instance bear the responsibility for investigating irregularities, acting upon evidence of any major change affecting the nature or the conditions for the implementation or control of operations or operational programmes under Title II of Part 2 and making the financial corrections required in accordance with paragraphs 2 to 4.
Poleg tega izterjajo sredstva, na katera vplivajo nepravilnosti v odhodkih, nastale po naslovu I dela 2.
They shall also recover funds affected by irregularities in expenditure effected under Title I of Part 2.
Država članica izvede potrebne finančne popravke v povezavi s posameznimi ali sistemskimi nepravilnostmi, odkritimi v poslovanju ali operativnih programih.
The Member State shall make the financial corrections required in connection with the individual or systemic irregularities detected in operations or operational programmes.
Popravki države članice obsegajo preklic celote ali dela javnega prispevka iz operativnega programa.
The corrections made by a Member State shall consist in cancelling all or part of the public contribution to the operational programme.
Država upošteva naravo in resnost nepravilnosti ter finančno izgubo sklada.
The Member State shall take into account the nature and gravity of the irregularities and the financial loss to the Funds.
Če tako določa ustrezna pravna podlaga, lahko država članica sredstva iz skladov, ki so bila sproščena na ta način, ponovno porabi za dejavnosti v okviru zadevnega operativnega programa (nadomestno financiranje).
Where this is provided for in the relevant legal basis, the resources from the funds released in this way may be reused by the Member State for operations within the operational programme concerned (replacement operation).
Prispevek, preklican v skladu z odstavkom 2, se ne sme ponovno porabiti za:
The contribution cancelled in accordance with paragraph 2 may not be reused for:
(a) posel ali posle, ki so bili predmet popravka, niti
(a) the operation or operations that were the subject of the correction, nor
(b) kadar je bil finančni popravek izveden zaradi sistemske nepravilnosti za obstoječe posle v okviru celote ali dela prednostne osi, kjer je do te sistemske napake prišlo, niti
(b) where a financial correction is made for a systemic irregularity, for existing operations within the whole or part of the priority axis where the systemic irregularity occurred, nor
(c) kadar se finančni popravek izvede v nadomestnem financiranju.
(c) where a financial correction is made in a replacement operation.
V primeru sistemskih nepravilnosti država članica razširi svojo preiskavo na vse posle, ki bi lahko bili prizadeti.
In the case of a systemic irregularity, the Member State shall extend its enquiries to cover all operations liable to be affected.
Ta predlog spremembe je odgovor na dolgotrajno kritiko Računskega sodišča glede upravljanja sredstev.
The amendment responds to long standing criticism of the ECA with regard to the management of funds.
Izboljšati je treba sledljivost sredstev.
The traceability of the funds is to be improved.
Člen 77 b (novo)
Article 77 b (new)
Člen 77b
Article 77b
Merila za finančne popravke Komisije
Criteria for financial corrections by the Commission
Komisija izvede finančne popravke, tako da prekliče celoten prispevek ali del prispevka Unije operativnemu programu, če po ustrezni preučitvi ugotovi, da:
The Commission applies financial corrections by cancelling all or part of the Union contribution to an operational programme where, after carrying out the necessary examination, it concludes that:
(a) obstaja resna pomanjkljivost v sistemu upravljanja in kontrole programa, kar ogroža prispevek Unije, ki je programu že bil izplačan;
(a) there is a serious deficiency in the management and control system of the programme which has put at risk the Union contribution already paid to the programme;
(b) je odhodek v potrjenem izkazu o odhodkih nepravilen in ga država članica pred začetkom sanacijskega postopka iz tega odstavka ni popravila;
(b) expenditure contained in a certified statement of expenditure is irregular and has not been corrected by the Member State prior to the opening of the correction procedure under this paragraph;
(c) država članica ni izpolnila svojih obveznosti iz člena 77a pred začetkom postopka finančnih popravkov iz tega odstavka.
(c) a Member State has not complied with its obligations under Article 77a prior to the opening of the correction procedure under this paragraph.
Komisija svoje finančne popravke utemelji na posameznih primerih ugotovljene nepravilnosti, pri čemer upošteva sistemsko naravo nepravilnosti, da ugotovi, ali je treba uporabiti pavšalen ali ekstrapolacijski popravek.
The Commission shall base its financial corrections on individual cases of irregularity identified, taking account of the systemic nature of the irregularity to determine whether a flat rate or extrapolated correction should be applied.
Pavšalni popravki se uporabljajo samo takrat, kadar je zaradi narave primera nemogoče določiti obseg in znesek ugotovljene nepravilnosti ali ekstrapolirati zneska, ki ga je treba popraviti.
Flat rate corrections shall only be applied where it is impossible, due to the nature of the case, to either identify the extent and amount of the irregularity found or to extrapolate the amount to be corrected.
Komisija pri odločanju o višini popravka upošteva naravo in resnost nepravilnosti ter obseg in finančne posledice ugotovljenih pomanjkljivosti v zadevnem operativnem programu.
The Commission shall, when deciding the amount of a correction, take into account the nature and gravity of the irregularity and the extent and financial implications of the deficiencies found in the operational programme concerned.
Če ni drugače določeno v veljavni zakonodaji, veljajo naslednje stopnje popravkov:
Unless otherwise provided for in the applicable legal basis, the following rates for correction apply:
Stopnja popravka se lahko določi na 100 %, kadar so pomanjkljivosti v sistemu države članice za upravljanje in kontrolo ali posamezne kršitve tako resne, da predstavljajo popolno nezmožnost izpolnjevanja pravil Skupnosti, tako da so vsa plačila nepravilna;
The rate of correction may be fixed at 100% when the deficiencies in the Member State’s management and control system are, or an individual breach is, so serious as to constitute a complete failure to comply with Community rules, thus rendering all the payments irregular;
Kadar je uporaba sistema države članice za upravljanje in kontrolo hudo pomanjkljiva in obstajajo dokazi o obsežnih nepravilnostih in malomarnosti pri odpravljanju nepravilnosti ali sleparski praksi, je utemeljen 25 % popravek, saj se lahko upravičeno domneva, da bo svoboda predložitve nepravilnih zahtevkov brez kazni povzročila izjemno velike izgube za sklad.
When a Member State’s application of its management and control system is gravely deficient, and there is evidence of widespread irregularity, and negligence in countering irregular or fraudulent practices, a correction of 25% is justified, as it can then reasonably be assumed that the freedom to submit irregular claims with impunity will occasion exceptionally high losses to the Fund.
Popravek te stopnje je ustrezen tudi za nepravilnosti v posameznem primeru, ki so resne, vendar ne razveljavijo celotne operacije;
A correction at this rate is also appropriate for irregularities in an individual case which are serious but do not invalidate the whole operation;
Kadar ena ali več ključnih sestavin sistema ne deluje ali pa delujejo tako slabo ali neredno, da so povsem neučinkovite za določanje upravičenosti zahtevka ali preprečevanje nepravilnosti, je utemeljen 10 % popravek, saj lahko razumno sklepamo, da obstaja veliko tveganje obsežne izgube za sklad.
When one or more key elements of the system do not function or function so poorly or so infrequently that they are completely ineffective in determining the eligibility of the claim or preventing irregularity, a correction of 10% is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that there was a high risk of widespread loss to the Fund.
Ta stopnja popravka je ustrezna tudi za posamezne nepravilnosti zmerne resnosti glede na ključne sestavine sistema.
This rate of correction is also appropriate for individual irregularities of moderate seriousness in relation to key elements of the system;
Kadar vse ključne sestavine sistema delujejo, vendar ne tako dosledno, pogosto ali poglobljeno, kakor zahtevajo predpisi, je utemeljen 5 % popravek, saj lahko razumno sklepamo, da ne zagotavljajo zadostne stopnje pravilnosti zahtevkov in obstaja znatno tveganje za sklade.
When all the key elements of the system function, but not with the consistency, frequency, or depth required by the regulations, then a correction of 5% is justified, as it can reasonably be concluded that they do not provide a sufficient level of assurance of the regularity of claims, and that the risk to the Funds was significant.
5 % popravek je lahko ustrezen tudi za manj resne nepravilnosti v posameznih operacijah glede na ključne sestavine.
A 5% correction can also be appropriate for less serious irregularities in individual operations in relation to key elements.
Dejstvo, da je mogoče način, kako sistem deluje, izpopolniti, samo po sebi ni zadosten razlog za finančni popravek.
The fact that the way in which a system operates is perfectible is not in itself sufficient grounds for a financial correction.
Obstajati mora resna pomanjkljivost skladnosti z izrecnimi pravili Unije ali standardi dobre prakse, pomanjkljivost pa mora pomeniti resno tveganje izgube ali nepravilnosti za strukturni sklad.
There must be a serious deficiency of compliance with explicit Union rules or standards of good practice and the deficiency must expose the Structural Funds to a real risk of loss or irregularity;
Kadar je izvajanje ustrezno glede na ključne sestavine sistema, vendar povsem odpove pri delovanju ene ali več pomožnih sestavin, je utemeljen 2 % popravek glede na manjše tveganje izgube za sklad in manjšo resnost kršitve.
When performance is adequate in relation to the key elements of the system, but there is a complete failure to operate one or more ancillary elements, a correction of 2% is justified in view of the lower risk of loss to the Fund, and the lesser seriousness of the infringement.
2 % popravek se poveča na 5 %, če se po datumu uvedbe prvega popravka ugotovi ista pomanjkljivost v zvezi z izdatki in država članica po prvem popravku ne sprejme ustreznih korektivnih ukrepov za del sistema z napako.
A 2% correction will be increased to 5% if the same deficiency is established in relation to expenditure after the date of the first correction imposed and the Member State has failed to take adequate corrective measures for the part of the system at fault after the first correction.
2 % popravek je utemeljen tudi, kadar Komisija obvesti državo članico, ne da bi uvedla kak popravek, da je treba izboljšati pomožne sestavine sistema, ki so uvedene, vendar ne delujejo zadovoljivo, država članica pa ne sprejme potrebnih ukrepov.
A correction of 2% is also justified where the Commission has informed the Member State, without imposing any correction, of the need to make improvements to ancillary elements of the system that are in place but do not operate satisfactorily, but the Member State has not taken the necessary action.
Popravki se naložijo samo za pomanjkljivosti v pomožnih sestavinah sistemov za upravljanje in kontrolo, kadar niso ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti pri ključnih sestavinah.
Corrections are only imposed for deficiencies in ancillary elements of management and control systems where no deficiencies have been identified in key elements.
Če obstajajo pomanjkljivosti v zvezi s pomožnimi, pa tudi ključnimi sestavinami, se popravki naredijo samo po stopnji, ki se uporablja za ključne sestavine.
If there are deficiencies in relation to ancillary elements as well as in key elements, corrections are only made at the rate applicable to the key elements.
Če država članica ne spoštuje svojih obveznosti iz veljavne zakonodaje, lahko Komisija izvede finančni popravek, glede na stopnjo nespoštovanja teh obveznosti, z ukinitvijo dela ali celotnega prispevka zadevni državi članici.
When a Member State does not comply with its obligations under the applicable legal basis, the Commission may, in relation to the degree of non-compliance with these obligations, make a financial correction by cancelling all or part of the contribution to the Member State concerned.
Če ni drugače določeno v veljavni zakonodaji, so finančni popravki, ki veljajo za:
Unless otherwise provided for in the applicable legal basis, the financial corrections applicable to:
(a) neupoštevanje predpisov za javna naročila, in
(a) non compliance with public procurement rules, and
(b) pomanjkljivosti med dogovorjenimi in doseženimi cilji ter
(b) shortcomings between agreed target levels and levels achieved, as well as
(c) katere koli druge obveznosti, ki izhajajo neposredno iz uporabe pravne podlage ali, kadar je to določeno v sporazumu o financiranju, in kadar kršitev teh obveznosti v celoti ali delno ovira politiko Unijo, na kateri temelji financiranje, ali kadar je to potrebno za zaščito finančnih interesov Unije;
(c) any other obligations arising directly out of the application of the legal basis or where this is stipulated in a funding agreement, where the breach of such obligations frustrates in full or in part the Union’s policy on which the funding is based or where the protection of the Union’s financial interests so requires
tisti popravki, ki jih določa delegirana uredba iz člena 199.
shall be those laid down in the delegated regulation referred to with Article 199.
Če Komisija svoje stališče utemeljuje na podlagi dejstev, ki so jih ugotovili revizorji zunaj njenih služb, izpelje lastne zaključke glede finančnih posledic po pregledu ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela zadevna država članica v skladu s členom 77a, poročil, predloženih v skladu s členom 56, in vseh odgovorov države članice.
Where the Commission bases its position on facts established by auditors other than those of its own services, it shall draw its own conclusions regarding the financial consequences after examining the measures taken by the Member State concerned under Article 77a, the reports supplied under Article 56, and any replies from the Member State.
Člen 77 c (novo)
Article 77 c (new)
Člen 77c
Article 77c
Zmanjšanje finančnih popravkov
Reduction of financial corrections
Če organ upravljanja poda resnično in zanesljivo izjavo o upravljanju, se višina finančnega popravka za vsak posamezni sklad v dani državi članici, za katero velja tak popravek, zmanjša:
The amount of financial corrections for any specific funds in any given Member State subject to such correction shall be reduced where the management body has given a true and fair management declaration:
(a) za 10 %, če Komisija ugotovi, da je ta država članica v zadnjih dveh zaporednih letih dosegala stopnjo napak pod 2 %;
(a) where the Commission has established for the two consecutive previous years that this Member State has achieved an error rate below 2%, by 10%;
(b) za 20 %, če Komisija ugotovi, da je ta država članica v zadnjih petih zaporednih letih dosegala stopnjo napak pod 2 %;
(b) where the Commission has established for the five consecutive previous years that a Member State has achieved an error rate below 2%, by 20%;
(c) za 50 %, če Komisija ugotovi, da je ta država članica v zadnjih desetih zaporednih letih dosegala stopnjo napak pod 2 %,
(c) where the Commission has established for the ten consecutive previous years that a Member State has achieved an error rate below 2%, by 50%;
razen če je bil sam izračun stopnje napak izveden na goljufiv ali drugače nameren ali skrajno malomaren način
unless the act of establishment of the error rate itself has been subject to fraud or other intentional or grossly negligent misconduct.
Finančni popravek se zmanjša za petnajst odstotkov na sklad, če država članica predloži nacionalno izjavo o odhodkih, ki jih je imela po sistemu deljenega upravljanja v skladu s členom 56(6b).
The financial correction shall be reduced by fifteen per cent per fund, where a Member State has submitted a national declaration on the expenditure made under the system of shared management in accordance with Article 56(6b).
Ne glede na druge ukrepe, ki jih sprejme Komisija, se organ upravljanja, ki je predložil lažno izjavo o upravljanju, izključi iz zmanjšanja v skladu s tem členom.
Without prejudice to other measures taken by the Commission, a management body that has returned a false management declaration shall be barred from reductions in application of this Article.
Člen 77 d (novo)
Article 77 d (new)
Člen 77d
Article 77d
Kontradiktorni postopek
Contradictory procedure
Preden Komisija sprejme odločitev o finančnem popravku, uvede kontradiktorni postopek, tako da državo članico seznani s svojimi začasnimi sklepi.
Before taking a decision on a financial correction, the Commission shall open the contradictory procedure by informing the Member State of its provisional conclusions.
Država članica v dveh mesecih po prejemu začasnih sklepov:
Within two months following receipt of the provisional conclusions, the Member State shall:
(a) potrdi prejem teh sklepov in soglaša z njimi; ali
(a) confirm receipt and agree to the provisional conclusions; or
(b) dobi možnost, da s pregledom ustrezne dokumentacije dokaže, da je bil obseg nepravilnosti manjši, kot je ocenila Komisija, če ta predlaga finančni popravek na osnovi ekstrapolacije ali pavšala.
(b) be given the opportunity to demonstrate through an examination of the documentation concerned, that the actual extent of irregularity was less than the Commission’s assessment, where the Commission proposes a financial correction on the basis of extrapolation or at a flat rate.
V soglasju s Komisijo lahko država članica omeji obseg tega pregleda na ustrezen delež ali vzorec zadevne dokumentacije. ali
In agreement with the Commission, the Member State may limit the scope of this examination to an appropriate proportion or sample of the documentation concerned; or
(c) jo Komisija povabi na zaslišanje, ki ga vodi komisija, sestavljena iz vnaprej izbranih izvedencev iz držav članic in Komisije, pri katerem si obe strani na partnerski osnovi prizadevata doseči dogovor o ugotovitvah in potrebnih zaključkih.
(c) be invited to a hearing by the Commission, and chaired by a pre-selected panel comprising experts from both the Member States and Commission in which both sides in cooperation based on the partnership shall make efforts to reach an agreement concerning the observations and the conclusions to be drawn from them.
Razpoložljivi čas za postopke v točkah (a) in (b) se za vsako stran podaljša samo enkrat za največ dva meseca, potem ko zadevna stran drugo o tem na utemeljen način obvesti.
The time allowed for procedures under points (a) and (b) shall only be prolonged once for each party by a maximum of two months upon substantiated notice by the respective party to the other.