natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Poročilo o teh ocenah pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu in Komisiji."
The report on this evaluation shall be sent to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission."
Sklep 2002/187/PNZ Člen 32 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Decision 2002/187/JHA Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Sklep 2002/187/PNZ Člen 32 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 2
Decision 2002/187/JHA Article 32 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
– drugi pododstavek odstavka 1 se nadomesti:
– the second subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be replaced by the following:
Sklep 2002/187/PNZ Člen 32 – odstavek 2
Decision 2002/187/JHA Article 32 – paragraph 2
vsako leto
Each year the
Evropskemu parlamentu o
to the European Parliament on
Sklep 2002/187/PNZ Člen 42 – odstavek 2 2.
Decision 2002/187/JHA Article 42 – paragraph 2 2.
Komisija redno preučuje izvajanje tega sklepa s strani držav članic in o tem predloži
The Commission shall at regular intervals examine the implementation by the Member States of this Decision and shall submit a report thereon to
Svetu poročilo, ki mu po potrebi priloži predloge za izboljšanje pravosodnega sodelovanja in delovanja Eurojusta.
the Council together with, if appropriate, necessary proposals to improve judicial cooperation and the functioning of Eurojust.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 343/2003 z dne 18. februarja 2003 o vzpostavitvi meril in mehanizmov za določitev države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, ki jo v eni od držav članic vloži državljan tretje države ("Dublinska uredba") UL L 50, 25.2.2003, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national ('the Dublin Regulation') OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2725/2000 z dne 11. decembra 2000 o vzpostavitvi sistema Eurodac za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije UL L 316, 15.12.2000, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2725/2000 of 11 December 2000 concerning the establishment of 'Eurodac' for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention ('the Eurodac Regulation') OJ L 316, 15.12.2000, p.
("Direktiva o sprejemu"),
('the Reception Directive'),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 862/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o statistikah Skupnosti o selitvah in mednarodni zaščiti ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 311/76 o zbiranju statističnih podatkov o tujih delavcih UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 311/76 on the compilation of statistics on foreign workers OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o dostopu policijskih organov in organov kazenskega pregona držav članic ter Europola do sistema Eurodac 2807. zasedanje Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve v Luksemburgu, 12. in 13. junij 2007.
having regard to the Council Conclusions on access to Eurodac by Member States" police and law enforcement authorities as well as Europol 2807th Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting in Luxembourg, 12 and 13 June 2007.
ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 v okviru splošnega programa Solidarnost in upravljanje migracijskih tokov in razveljavitvi Odločbe Sveta 2004/904/ES UL L 144, 6.6.2007, str.
having regard to Decision No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the General programme Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2006 o položaju beguncev na Malti UL C 293 E, 2.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2006 on the situation with refugee camps in Malta OJ C 293 E, 2.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju poročil Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve o svojih obiskih v centrih za pridržanje v več državah članicah,
having regard to the reports of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on its visits to detention centres in several Member States,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. junija 2007 o azilu: sodelovanje v praksi in kakovost odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 21 June 2007 on asylum: practical cooperation, quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0287/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0287/2008 ),
ker ima vsak prosilec za azil pravico, da se njegova prošnja preuči posamično in temeljito,
whereas every asylum seeker is entitled to a full, individual examination of his or her claim,
ker se zakonodaja o azilu in praksa v posameznih državah še vedno zelo razlikujeta in so zaradi tega prosilci za azil v posameznih državah članicah v okviru dublinskega sistema različno obravnavani,
whereas asylum legislation and practice still vary widely from country to country and, as a result, asylum-seekers receive different treatment from one Dublin State to another,
ker dublinski sistem temelji na vzajemnem zaupanju in zanesljivosti in ker je zaradi neizpolnjenosti teh pogojev, tj. v primeru resnih pomanjkljivosti pri zbiranju podatkov in neskladnosti v procesu odločanja v določenih državah članicah, ogrožen celoten sistem,
whereas the Dublin system is rooted in such premises as mutual trust and reliability and, if these prerequisites are not fulfilled, i.e. if there are serious gaps in data collection or inconsistencies in the decision-making process in certain Member States, the whole system suffers,
ker obstajajo dokazi, da nekatere države članice ne zagotavljajo dejanskega dostopa do postopka za določanje statusa begunca,
whereas there is evidence that some Member States do not guarantee effective access to a procedure for determining refugee status,
ker nekatere države članice Direktive o sprejemu ne uporabljajo učinkovito ne za prosilce za azil, ki čakajo na predajo v drugo državo v skladu z Dublinsko uredbo, ne ob njihovi vrnitvi v pristojno državo članico,
whereas some Member States do not apply the Reception Directive effectively, either to asylum applicants awaiting transfer to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation, or at the point of return to the Member State responsible,
ker nekatere države članice sistematično pridržujejo osebe, ki spadajo pod dublinski sistem,
whereas some Member States systematically place persons subject to the Dublin system in detention,
ker visoko število večkrat vloženih prošenj in nizko število opravljenih predaj kažeta na pomanjkljivost dublinskega sistema in nujno potrebo po vzpostavitvi skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema,
whereas the high level of multiple requests and the low level of effected transfers are indicators of the deficiencies of the Dublin system and of the need to establish a common European asylum system,
ker lahko pravilno izvajanje Dublinske uredbe povzroči neenakomerno porazdelitev odgovornosti za osebe, ki iščejo zaščito, v škodo nekaterih držav članic, ki so zaradi geografske lege zlasti izpostavljene migracijskim tokovom,
whereas a correct implementation of the Dublin Regulation may well result in the unequal distribution of responsibility for persons seeking protection, to the detriment of some Member States particularly exposed to migration flows simply on the grounds of their geographical location,
ker ocena Komisije kaže, da je moralo leta 2005 13 držav članic na zunanjih mejah Unije obravnavati vedno večje izzive, ki so posledica dublinskega sistema,
whereas the Commission's evaluation reveals that, in 2005, the thirteen Member States at the borders of the Union had to deal with increasing challenges raised by the Dublin system,
ker morajo južne države članice sprejemati prošnje za azil nezakonitih priseljencev, ki jih rešijo, ko na poti v Evropo zaidejo v težave,
whereas southern Member States are having to accept asylum applications from irregular immigrants who are rescued when in distress whilst they are on their way to Europe,
ker morajo južne države članice sprejemati prošnje za azil nezakonitih priseljencev brez kakršne koli pomoči tretjih držav, čeprav so k temu zavezane v skladu z mednarodnim pravom,
whereas southern Member States are having to accept asylum applications from irregular immigrants without any assistance from third countries which are obliged to provide such assistance under international law,
ker morda izpolnjevanje obveznosti glede evidentiranja nezakonitih priseljencev v zbirko podatkov Eurodac ni v interesu držav članic, ker se zaradi tega lahko poveča število prošenj za azil, ki jih bodo morale obravnavati,
whereas Member States may have no interest in complying with the obligation of registering illegal entrants in the Eurodac database, as this may result in increasing the number of applications for asylum which they will have to deal with,
ker Dublinska uredba uvaja sistem, ki je namenjen določitvi države članice, pristojne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, vendar na začetku ni bil vzpostavljen kot mehanizem za porazdelitev bremena, zato tudi temu ne služi,
whereas the Dublin Regulation establishes a system which is designed to determine the Member State responsible for dealing with a claim, but it was not originally put in place for, and therefore fails to serve as, a burden-sharing mechanism,
ker mora kakršna koli ocena dublinskega sistema vključevati konkreten, trajen, pravičen in funkcionalen mehanizem za porazdelitev bremena,
whereas it is essential that any evaluation of the Dublin system is accompanied by a concrete, permanent, fair and functional burden-sharing mechanism,
ker je načelo države prvega vstopa v okviru dublinskega sistema zelo pritiskalo na države članice na zunanjih mejah,
whereas the Dublin system's first-country-of-entry criteria put a lot of pressure on the border Member States,
ker se v posameznih državah članicah stopnje priznavanja kandidatov za status begunca za nekatere državljane tretjih držav razlikujejo od približno 0 % do 90 %,
whereas recognition rates of candidates for refugee status vary for certain third-country nationals from approximately 0% to 90% within Member States,
ker je bistveno, da so posamezniki, ki vlagajo prošnje, v celoti seznanjeni z dublinskim postopkom in njegovimi možnimi posledicami v jeziku, ki ga razumejo,
whereas it is essential that individuals lodging claims are fully apprised of the Dublin process, in a language which they understand, and its possible consequences,
ker člen 24(2) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah določa, da morajo javni organi ali zasebne ustanove pri ukrepanju v zvezi z otroki vedno upoštevati predvsem koristi otroka,
whereas Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union states that in all actions relating to children, whether taken by public authorities or private institutions, the child's best interests must be a primary consideration,
ker čeprav Dublinska uredba kot prvo merilo, ki ga je treba uporabiti, navaja enotnost družine, se ta določba pogosto ne uporablja,
whereas although family unity is mentioned first in the hierarchy of criteria applied in the Dublin Regulation, that provision is not often applied,
ker so statistični podatki o predajah očitno pomanjkljivi, saj na primer ne vključujejo informacij o številu zahtev za sprejema prosilca za azil zaradi nezakonitega prehoda meje, ali deleža "sprejemov" v primerjavi z deležem "ponovnih sprejemov",
whereas there is an obvious lack of accuracy in statistical data on transfers, as they do not indicate, for instance, the rate of requests for taking charge of an asylum applicant based on an irregular crossing of the border, or the proportion of 'taking charge' versus 'taking back' requests,
ker je leta 2005 devet od novih držav članic objavilo, da so zabeležile več predaj v državo v okviru izvajanja Dublinske uredbe, in ker so države članice, ki nimajo zunanjih kopenskih meja Unije, objavile, da so zabeležile več predaj iz države,
whereas in 2005 nine of the new Member States stated that they were registering more "incoming" transfers under the Dublin Regulation and Member States with no external land border of the Union stated that they were registering more "outgoing" transfers,
ker Komisija ni uspela oceniti stroškov dublinskega sistema in je ta podatek pomemben, da se lahko oceni njegovo učinkovitost,
whereas the Commission has been unable to evaluate the cost of the Dublin system and whereas that information is important to be able to assess its effectiveness,
ker je Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve na zasedanju v Luksemburgu 12. in 13. junija 2007 Komisijo pozval, da čim prej predloži predlog spremembe k Uredbi Eurodac, da se policijskim organom in organom kazenskega pregona držav članic ter Europolu pod določenimi pogoji omogoči dostop do zbirke podatkov Eurodac, ki je bila prvotno vzpostavljena kot orodje za izvajanje Dublinske uredbe,
whereas the Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting in Luxembourg on 12 and 13 June 2007 invited the Commission to present as soon as possible an amendment to the Eurodac Regulation with the aim of enabling Member States' police and law-enforcement authorities, as well as Europol, to have access under certain conditions to Eurodac, a database which was conceived originally as a tool for implementing the Dublin Regulation,
Učinkovitost sistema in porazdelitev odgovornosti
Efficiency of the system and responsibility sharing
je trdno prepričan, da je treba v Evropski uniji zagotoviti zadovoljivo in enotno raven zaščite, drugače dublinski sistem ne bo nikoli dosegel zadovoljivih rezultatov s tehničnega vidika in vidika prosilcev za azil, ki bodo še naprej imeli utemeljene razloge za vlaganje prošenj v določeni državi članici, da bi lahko izkoristili najugodnejše postopke sprejemanja odločitev;
Strongly believes that unless a satisfactory and consistent level of protection is achieved across the European Union, the Dublin system will always produce unsatisfactory results from both the technical and the human viewpoints, and asylum seekers will continue to have valid reasons for wishing to lodge their application in a specific Member State to take advantage of the most favourable national decision-making;
je trdno prepričan, da bo dublinski sistem zaradi pomanjkanja pravega evropskega azilnega sistema in enotnega postopka še naprej nepravičen za prosilce za azil in hkrati za nekatere države članice;
Strongly believes that in the absence of a genuine common European asylum system and a single procedure the Dublin system will continue to be unfair both to asylum seekers and to certain Member States;
ponovno poudarja nujno potrebo po izboljšanju kakovosti in usklajenosti procesa odločanja; je prepričan, da lahko v zvezi s tem pomembno vlogo igra Evropski azilni urad, na primer z zagotavljanjem usposabljanja za dosego visokih skupnih standardov in zagotavljanjem podporne strokovne skupine;
Reaffirms the urgent need for the improvement of both the quality and the consistency of the decision-making process; is convinced that a European Asylum Support Office could play a valuable role in this respect, for example in providing training to high common standards and through the provision of expert support teams;
poziva Komisijo, da preuči načine za zagotovitev neposrednega financiranja Visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce (UNHCR) kot dopolnitev sedanjega financiranja na podlagi projektov, da bo ta lahko okrepil spremljanje in svetovanje v EU in naprej razvijal metode, namenjene podpiranju nacionalnih organov pri njihovih prizadevanjih za izboljšanje kakovosti njihovega odločanja;
Asks the Commission to consider ways of providing the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) with direct financing to complement project-based funding in order to enable it to enhance its monitoring and advisory work in the EU and continue developing methods intended to support national authorities in their efforts to improve the quality of their decision-making;
poziva Komisijo, da pred vzpostavitvijo evropskih mehanizmov za porazdelitev bremen preuči možnost vzpostavitve drugačnih mehanizmov, ne le finančnih, na podlagi Dublinske uredbe, da se bodo odpravile pogubne posledice njenega izvajanja za manjše države članice na zunanjih mejah Unije;
Calls on the Commission, pending the introduction of European burden-sharing mechanisms, to consider providing for mechanisms other than financial within the Dublin Regulation to correct the adverse effects of its implementation for the smaller Member States at the Union's external borders;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi zavezujoč mehanizem za preprečitev predaje prosilcev za azil državam članicam, ki ne zagotavljajo celovite in pravične obravnave njihovih prošenj, in da sistematično sprejme ukrepe proti tem državam;
Asks the Commission to provide for a binding mechanism to stop transfers of asylum applicants to Member States that do not guarantee full and fair treatment of their claims and to take systematic measures against those States;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi pomembne dvostranske delovne odnose s tretjimi državami, da se olajša sodelovanje in zagotovi izpolnjevanje mednarodnih pravnih obveznosti s strani teh tretjih držav glede Ženevske konvencije z dne 28. julija 1951 o statusu beguncev in glede reševanja na morju;
Calls on the Commission to establish meaningful bilateral working relations with third countries in order to facilitate cooperation and ensure that such third countries meet their international legal obligations with regard to the Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 and rescue at sea;
Pravice prosilcev za azil
Rights of the claimants
poziva Komisijo, da v novo uredbo uvede jasnejše in strožje določbe v zvezi z načini obveščanja ljudi, ki iščejo zaščito, o posledicah Dublinske uredbe in da razmisli o izdelavi brošure, ki bi jo lahko prevedli v določeno število jezikov in razdelili v vseh državah članicah in bi upoštevala raven pismenosti posameznikov;
Asks the Commission to introduce into the new regulation clearer and more stringent provisions concerning the means by which the persons seeking protection are informed of the implications of the Dublin Regulation, and to consider drafting a standard leaflet which could be translated into a certain number of languages and be distributed to all Member States, and which should also take into account the individual levels of literacy;
poziva Komisijo, da spremeni člena 19 in 20 Dublinske uredbe v zvezi s sprejemom in ponovnim sprejemom tako, da se prosilcem zagotovi avtomatična pravica do pritožbe z odložilnim učinkom zoper odločitev o prenosu odgovornosti na drugo državo v skladu z Dublinsko uredbo;
Asks the Commission to amend Articles 19 and 20 of the Dublin Regulation on 'taking charge and taking back', so as to provide applicants with an automatic suspensory right of appeal against a decision to transfer responsibility to another Member State under the Dublin Regulation;
meni, da je treba izboljšati izmenjavo informacij o predajah med državami članicami, zlasti v zvezi s posebno zdravstveno oskrbo, ki jo prosilci potrebujejo;
Considers that information-sharing on transfers between Member States should be improved, especially with respect to special medical care needed for the transferees;
poziva Komisijo, da preuči možnost, da bi se lahko zadevna oseba, ki bi se morala na podlagi dublinskega sistema predati drugi državi članici, predala državi izvora le na njeno izrecno prošnjo in ob popolnem spoštovanju postopkovnih pravic;
Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility for individuals concerned by a transfer to another Member State under the Dublin system to be able to be transferred to their country of origin, solely at their express request and on the basis of full compliance with procedural rights;
predlaga, da se na ravni EU sprejmejo skupne smernice glede ugotavljanja starosti in da se v dvomu odloči v korist otroka;
Recommends that a set of common guidelines on age-assessment be adopted at European Union level and that in the event of uncertainty, the benefit of the doubt be given to the child;
opozarja, da je treba pri odločanju v zvezi z otroki vedno upoštevati načelo največje koristi za otroka; vztraja, da mladoletniki brez spremstva nikoli ne smejo biti pridržani ali predani drugi državi članici, razen za namen ponovne združitve družine ter če se izkaže, da je takšna predaja potrebna, pri čemer mora biti otroku v celotnem postopku zagotovljeno zakonito zastopstvo in spremstvo; zato pozdravlja namen Komisije, da nadalje pojasni uporabo dublinskih pravil za mladoletnike brez spremstva;
Recalls that in all decisions relating to children, the best interests of the child must be paramount; insists that unaccompanied minors should never be detained or transferred to another Member State, except for the sake of family reunification, and that if such a transfer proves necessary, the child must be duly represented and accompanied throughout the procedure; welcomes, therefore, the Commission's intention to further clarify the applicability of Dublin rules to unaccompanied minors;
obžaluje, da je opredelitev družinskega člana v skladu z veljavno uredbo preveč omejevalna, ter poziva Komisijo, da razširi opredelitev tako, da bo vključevala vse bližnje sorodnike in dolgoletne partnerje, zlasti tiste, ki nimajo druge družinske podpore, in odrasle otroke, ki ne morejo skrbeti sami zase;
Regrets that the definition of a family member under the current Regulation is too restrictive and asks the Commission to extend the present definition to include all close relatives and long-term partners, particularly those who have no other family support, and adult children unable to care for themselves;
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da razširi obseg uporabe Dublinske uredbe na subsidiarno zaščito ter s tem omogočila prosilcem za subsidiarno zaščito, da se ponovno združijo z družinskimi člani, ki jim je bila tovrstna zaščita odobrena ali so zaprosili zanjo v drugi državi članici;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to extend the scope of the Dublin Regulation to include subsidiary protection, as this should enable applicants for subsidiary protection to be reunited with family members who were granted this type of protection or are asking for it in another Member State;
poziva Komisijo, da doda določbo, v skladu s katero se pridržanje prosilcev uporabi le kot ukrep v skrajni sili, obenem pa določi razloge za pridržanje in postopkovne zaščitne ukrepe, ki jih je treba zagotoviti;
Asks the Commission to add a provision restricting the detention of Dublin claimants to a measure of last resort, thereby specifying the grounds on which detention may be employed and the procedural safeguards which should be provided for;
poziva Komisijo, da se v Dublinski uredbi izrecno navede, da so prosilci v okviru dublinskega sistema upravičeni do enakih pogojev za sprejem kot drugi prosilci za azil v skladu s členom 3(1) Direktive o sprejemu, ki določa splošna pravila zlasti v zvezi z materialnimi pogoji za sprejem, zdravstvenim varstvom, svobodo gibanja in šolanjem mladoletnikov;
Asks the Commission to state explicitly in the Dublin Regulation that Dublin claimants are entitled to the same reception conditions as other asylum seekers, in accordance with the Reception Directive, Article 3(1) of which lays down general rules notably on material reception conditions, health care, freedom of movement and the schooling of minors;
Humanitarna določba in določba o prenosu suverenosti
Humanitarian and Sovereignty Clauses