natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da si upravljanje zemljišč in ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti nista v nasprotju in da celostno upravljanje ustvarja habitate za biotsko raznovrstnost;
Emphasises that land management and the conservation of biodiversity are not opposites and that integrated management creates habitats for biodiversity;
poudarja, da je pomembno zaustaviti in obrniti upad biotske raznovrstnosti gojenih vrst in sort rastlin, ki vodi v zmanjševanje genetske osnove, na kateri temelji prehrana ljudi in živali; poudarja, da je treba spodbujati uporabo tradicionalnih kmetijskih sort, značilnih za določene regije;
Stresses the importance of halting and reversing the decline in the diversity of cultivated plant species and varieties, which leads to the erosion of the genetic basis on which human and animal nutrition depends; underlines the need to promote the use of traditional agricultural varieties specific to certain regions;
ob upoštevanju gospodarske, družbene in okoljske vrednosti kmetijske raznovrstnosti in genske raznovrstnosti živine poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli posebne prednostne cilje za zaustavitev izgube genske raznovrstnosti in zaustavitev izgube avtohtonih vrst; poziva k sprejetju opredelitve „avtohtonih“/„neavtohtonih“ pasem in ukrepov za njihovo ohranitev;
Taking into account the economic, social and environmental value of agricultural and livestock genetic diversity, urges the Commission to define specific priority targets to halt the loss of genetic diversity and halt the loss of native species; calls further for the adoption of a definition of ‘native’ / ‘non-native’ breeds and measures for their conservation;
ocenjuje, da bi morala SKP kmetom, ki nudijo dodatne storitve v dobro ekosistemov in pomagajo ohranjati biotsko raznovrstnost, zagotoviti dodatna neposredna plačila na površino, ki bi jih financirala Evropska unija; ponovno poudarja svojo zahtevo glede „bonusnega“ sistema navzkrižne skladnosti, s katerim se kmetom dodelijo „bonusne“ točke za ukrepe za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, ki presegajo obveznosti, določene z zadovoljivo kmetijsko in okoljsko navzkrižno skladnostjo;
Considers that the CAP should reward farmers who provide additional ecosystem services which help conserve biodiversity via an EU-funded top-up direct area payment; reiterates its request for ‘bonus’ cross-compliance that awards farmers bonus points for actions fostering biodiversity and implemented in addition to the obligations arising from good agro-environmental cross-compliance;
ugotavlja, da je bil v okoljski zakonodaji dosežen velik napredek, npr. z uvedbo celostnega zatiranja škodljivcev ter novo zakonodajo EU o pesticidih, ki omogoča posebno varstvo rastlin, pri čemer se zatirajo škodljivci in ščitijo koristni organizmi;
Notes that much progress has been made in environmental legislation, such as the introduction of integrated pest management and the new EU pesticide legislation, which makes it possible for pest management to target harmful organisms, thereby protecting beneficial organisms;
pozdravlja reformo skupne ribiške politike, ki se zdaj pripravlja, in poziva Komisijo, naj vključi merila biotske raznovrstnosti v prihodnje zakonodajne predloge; poleg tega vztraja, da je treba kot nadomestno možnost ribolovu razviti trajnostne modele ribogojstva v skladu s smernicami, ki jih je predlagala Komisija v svojem sporočilu o izgradnji trajnostne prihodnosti ribogojstva ( KOM(2009)0162 ) in ob upoštevanju stališča Evropskega parlamenta v svoji resoluciji z dne 17. julija 2010;
Welcomes the reform of the common fisheries policy currently being prepared and calls on the Commission to mainstream biodiversity criteria in its future legislative proposals; furthermore, insists that, as a possible alternative to fishing, sustainable aquaculture models should be developed along the lines proposed by the Commission in its communication on building a sustainable future for aquaculture ( COM(2009)0162 ), taking into account the European Parliament's position in its resolution of 17 July 2010;
poudarja, da so poleg direktiv o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic in habitatov glavno orodje za doseganje/uresničitev ciljev biotske raznovrstnosti v morskem okolju okvirna direktiva o vodah za obalne vode in okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji za vse morske vode;
States that the major tools for achieving biodiversity objectives in the marine environment, in addition to the Habitats and Birds Directives, are the Water Framework Directive for coastal waters and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive for all marine waters;
meni, da mora biti zmanjšanje zavržkov eden glavnih ciljev skupne ribiške politike in poziva Komisijo, naj ugotovi vzroke za zavržke ter pripravi specifične rešitve za vsako ribolovno območje, zlasti z določitvijo kvot za več vrst ali za biomaso, s selektivnostjo ribolovnega orodja, na primer splošno uporabo mrež s kvadratastimi mrežnimi očesi, ter s prostorskim upravljanjem staležev;
Considers that a reduction in discards must be a major objective of the CFP and calls on the Commission to identify the causes of discards and to work out solutions specific to each fishery, in particular through the introduction of multi-species or biomass quotas, through the selectivity of gear, such as the general use of square-meshed nets, and through spatial management of stocks;
meni, da so za upravljanje ribiških dejavnosti in zagotavljanje odgovornega ribolova na odprtem morju pristojne regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva; zato ocenjuje, da je nujno okrepiti njihove pristojnosti, zlasti glede nadzora in odvračilnih kazni, ter da morajo zlasti regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva biti odgovorne za upravljanje staležev nekaterih komercialno pomembnih vrst rib in zahtevati uporabo potrdil o ulovu;
Considers that regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) are responsible for the management of fisheries and guarantors of responsible fishing on the high seas; considers that it is therefore essential to strengthen their powers, in particular with regard to controls and deterrent penalties, and that it is first and foremost up to RFMOs to manage the stocks of certain marine species of commercial importance and to require the use of catch certificates;
poudarja, da je potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje na področju integriranega upravljanja obalnega območja in pomorskega prostorskega načrtovanja, saj bi to lahko bila pomembna elementa ekosistemskega pristopa sodelovanja, ki bi zagotovil ohranjanje in trajnostno upravljanje z morskimi in obalnimi viri ob hkratnem spoštovanju naravnih procesov in zmogljivost ekosistema;
Stresses the need for further action in the field of integrated coastal zone management (ICZM) and maritime spatial planning as these could be important elements of a participatory ecosystem approach, ensuring the conservation and sustainable management of marine and coastal resources, respecting natural processes and ecosystem carrying capacity;
glede na znaten upad vodne biotske raznovrstnosti in degradacije sladkovodnih ekosistemov poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti polno izvajanje okvirne direktive o vodah in poudarja, da je treba obravnavati upad biotske raznovrstnosti v okviru načrtovanja upravljanja povodij;
Given the significant decline in aquatic biodiversity and degradation of freshwater ecosystems, emphasises the importance of ensuring the full implementation of the Water Framework Directive and stresses the need to address biodiversity decline in river basin management planning;
poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo gozdarsko politiko tako, da bo v celoti upoštevala vlogo gozda kot rezerve za biotsko raznovrstnost, ohranjanje in nastajanje tal, skladiščenje ogljika in čiščenje zraka ter za rekreacijo naših državljanov;
Urges Member States to design their forestry policy in a way that takes fully into account the role of forests as a reserve for biodiversity, soil retention and formation, carbon sequestration and air purification characteristics and for purposes of recreation for our citizens;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije ( KOM(2008)0645 konč.) o spopadanju z izzivi krčenja in propadanja gozdov z namenom preprečevanja podnebnih sprememb in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti, v kateri navaja cilj, da se do najpozneje leta 2030 zaustavi izginjanje gozdne odeje po vsem svetu;
Welcomes the Commission's communication on addressing the challenges of deforestation and forest degradation to tackle climate change and biodiversity loss ( COM(2008)0645 final), which calls for halting the global forest cover loss by 2030 at the latest;
poudarja, da naraščajoče povpraševanje po biogorivih ter posledično povečanje pritiska za njihovo proizvodnjo ogrožata biotsko raznovrstnost, zlasti v državah v razvoju, kar povzroča degradacijo in spreminjanje habitatov in ekosistemov, kot so mokrišča in gozdovi;
Points out that growing demand for agri-fuels and the consequent intensification of pressure for their production are threatening biodiversity, notably in developing countries, owing to the degradation and conversion of habitats and ecosystems such as wetlands and forests, among others;
poudarja potrebo po povečanju proračuna za raziskave na področju okolja in biotske raznovrstnosti v okviru osmega okvirnega programa, sorazmerno z velikimi potrebami po obravnavanju vprašanja izgube biotske raznovrstnost in podnebnih sprememb ter s tem povezanim izzivom;
Stresses the need to increase the budget for research dedicated to the environment and biodiversity under the Eighth Framework Programme, proportionate to the huge needs and challenges of tackling both biodiversity loss and climate change;
navaja, da Svet v odstavku 8 svojih sklepov z dne 21. oktobra 2009 poziva Komisijo, naj za vsak posamezen sektor nujno pregleda subvencije, ki imajo negativne posledice za okolje; poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma ukrepa v skladu s temi sklepi, da bi se izognili subvencijam za ukrepe, ki imajo negativne posledice za evropsko biotsko raznovrstnost;
Notes that paragraph 8 of the Council conclusions of 21 October 2009 invites the Commission to undertake an urgent sector-by-sector review of subsidies which have an adverse environmental impact; calls on the Commission to act on those conclusions immediately in order to avoid subsidies to policies which have a negative impact on European biodiversity;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si že na pripravljalni stopnji razvoja sedmega okoljskega akcijskega programa prizadeva za napredovanje in spodbujanje razprave in posebnih ukrepov v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo v EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use the preparatory phase of the development of the Seventh Environment Action Programme to advance and promote the debate as well as specific actions on biodiversity in the EU;
Biotska raznovrstnost in podnebne spremembe
Biodiversity and climate change
poudarja velik pomen biotske raznovrstnosti in odpornih ekosistemov za ublažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagoditev nanje, ob upoštevanju, da kopenski in morski ekosistemi zdaj vsrkavajo približno polovico antropogenih emisij CO2;
Underlines the vital importance of biodiversity and resilient ecosystems for climate change mitigation and adaptation, given the fact that terrestrial and marine ecosystems currently absorb around half of anthropogenic CO2 emissions;
pozdravlja vedno večjo podporo ukrepom za zmanjšanje vpliva podnebnih sprememb, ki lahko koristijo biotski raznovrstnosti, vendar ne smejo negativno vplivati na financiranje biotske raznovrstnosti kot tako;
Welcomes the increasing support for measures to reduce the impact of climate change from which biodiversity can also benefit, but which should not have a negative impact on the funding for biodiversity as such;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da ukrepi, sprejeti v okviru blažitve podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanja nanje, ne bodo imeli škodljivih učinkov na kopensko in morsko biotsko raznovrstnost;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that actions taken in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation do not have adverse effects on marine and terrestrial biodiversity;
meni, da imajo tla pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo; se zaveda, da ima degradacija tal primarno lokalne in regionalne vzroke in posledice ter da bi bilo posledično treba upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti; poziva države članice, naj izpolnijo svoje obveznosti glede zagotavljanja kakovosti tal in poskrbijo za dobro stanje tal ter poziva tiste države članice, ki nimajo zakonodaje o varstvu tal, naj prevzamejo svojo odgovornost;
Underlines that soil plays a vital role in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective; recognises that soil degradation has primarily local and regional causes and impact, and that the principle of subsidiarity should consequently be respected; calls on all Member States to fulfil their obligations in terms of guaranteeing soil quality and keep the soil in good condition and urges those Member States without soil protection legislation to shoulder their responsibilities;
Ekonomska vrednost biotske raznovrstnosti
Economic value of biodiversity
opozarja na osnovno gospodarsko in socialno vlogo ribištva v obalnem razvoju in okoljsko vlogo v morskih ekosistemih; meni, da SRP ne sme ovirati temveč mora lajšati skladnost ukrepov držav članic z zakonodajo o biotski raznovrstnosti, zlasti kar zadeva oblikovanje ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov na območjih Nature 2000;
Stresses the essential role played by fisheries from an economic and social point of view in coastal development and from an environmental point of view in marine ecosystems; considers that the CFP must not hinder but facilitate Member States' compliance with biodiversity legislation, in particular the establishment of adequate protection measures in marine Natura 2000 sites;
priznava velike zaposlitvene možnosti, povezane z razvojem trajnostnega gospodarstva in zelene infrastrukture, ki bi glede na svojo naravo pomenile lokalna delovna mesta (ki jih ni mogoče seliti v tretje države) in tako bistveno prispevale k strategiji EU 2020;
Recognises the considerable job potential that is linked to the development of a sustainable economy and green infrastructure, which by their nature would imply local jobs (which cannot be relocated to third countries), thus contributing considerably to the EU's 2020 Strategy;
poleg tega močno verjame, da so lahko in morajo biti učinkovitost virov, trajnostni gospodarski razvoj in ohranjanje narave usklajeni; zlasti poudarja razvoj ekološkega in kmečkega turizma, kjer se rekreacija in ohranjanje medsebojno krepita;
Furthermore, strongly believes that resource efficiency, sustainable economic development and nature conservation can and should go hand in hand; draws particular attention to the development of eco- and agri-tourism, whereby recreation and conservation are mutually reinforcing;
poudarja pomen ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti pri izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020, in sicer ne le zaradi zaposlitvenega potenciala, ki ga lahko ustvari, temveč tudi zaradi njenega prispevka k učinkoviti in trajnostni rabi virov; priznava, da so vse višje ravni proizvodnje surovin, trgovine in potrošnje pomembna gonilna sila za izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti, in zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za spodbujanje in razvoj učinkovitosti virov ter politike za trajnostno porabo in proizvodnjo;
Emphasises the importance of biodiversity conservation in the implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy, owing not only to the employment potential it can generate, but also to the contribution it makes to the efficient and sustainable use of resources; recognises that rising levels of materials production, trade, and consumption are an important driving force behind biodiversity loss, and therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to adopt measures to promote and develop resource efficiency and sustainable consumption and production (SCP) policies;
je seznanjen z oceno Komisije iz leta 2004, da bodo letni stroški za upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000 znašali 6,1 milijarde EUR; vendar opozarja, da je v skladu s poročilom TEEB donos naložb v ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti do stokrat višji;
Takes note of the Commission's estimates in 2004 for the annual cost of managing the Natura 2000 network at EUR 6.1 billion; points out however, that according to the TEEB report, the return on biodiversity conservation investment is up to a hundred times more;
vendar obžaluje, da Evropska komisija ni pripravila nobenih lastnih dodatnih virov financiranja za izvajanje direktiv Natura 2000 ter da ni jasne razčlenitve dejanskega zneska, porabljenega vsako leto za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti v EU, in vztraja, naj države članice in Komisija sodelujejo in zagotovijo jasnejšo sliko;
Deplores, however, the fact that no additional sources of funding for the implementation of the NATURA 2000 directives have been made available by the Commission, and that a clear breakdown of the actual amounts being spent per annum on biodiversity conservation in the EU is lacking, and insists that Member States and the Commission cooperate to provide a clearer picture;
meni, da bi morala Skupnost prevzeti večjo odgovornost za zaščito naravnih vrednot v omrežju Natura 2000, zlasti v smislu financiranja;
Believes that the Community should take greater responsibility for safeguarding natural values in the Natura 2000 network, particularly in the context of funding;
pozdravlja povečanje porabe za program LIFE+ (+ 8 % v osnutku proračuna za leto 2011), vendar poudarja, da ta instrument še vedno pomeni le zelo majhen del proračuna EU (0,2 %); poleg tega ugotavlja, da se ukrepi za ohranjanje, ki jih financira EU, po ustavitvi financiranja Skupnosti ne nadaljujejo vedno; poziva Komisijo, naj v večji meri obravnava različne dejavnike, ki so pomembni za trajnost projektov, ter uvede sistematsko spremljanje projektov po zadnjem izplačilu;
Welcomes the increase in spending for LIFE+ (+ 8% in the 2011 draft budget), but underlines that this instrument continues to represent only a very small part of the EU budget (0,2%); notes, moreover, that EU-funded conservation measures are not always continued once Community financing stops; calls on the Commission to give fuller consideration to the various factors relevant to the sustainability of projects and to introduce systematic monitoring of projects after the final payment;
se zaveda, da lahko dodatna finančna sredstva za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti zagotovijo drugi instrumenti, kot so strukturni skladi in sklad za razvoj podeželja, vendar obžaluje, da večina držav članic to možnost uporablja v omejenem obsegu; opozarja, da največji delež k financiranju biotske raznovrstnosti trenutno prispeva Evropski kmetijski sklad za razvoj podeželja;
Is aware that additional funding for biodiversity conservation is available through other instruments, such as the Structural Funds and the Rural Development Fund, but deplores the limited use most Member States make of this possibility; recalls that the biggest contribution for financing biodiversity is currently available through the EAFRD;
ne glede na prihodnje razprave in odločitve o novem večletnem finančnem okviru (od leta 2014 naprej) in vmesni pregled trenutnega proračunskega okvira (2007–2013) pričakuje, da bo treba zaradi proračunskih omejitev bolj kot kadar koli doseči visoko dodano vrednost in večjo učinkovitost porabe evropskih sredstev, tudi porabe za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti;
Without pre-empting future discussions and decisions about the new multiannual financial framework (from 2014 onwards) and the mid-term review of the current budgetary framework (2007-2013), expects that budgetary constraints will make it more necessary than ever to achieve high added value and increased effectiveness of European spending, including biodiversity spending;
zato poudarja, da je potreben boljši vpogled v učinkovitost porabe za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti, in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi primere dobre prakse v zvezi z učinkovitostjo in dodano vrednostjo;
Therefore, underlines the need to gain greater insight into the effectiveness of biodiversity spending and calls on the Commission to provide examples of good practice in terms of effectiveness and added value;
pozdravlja priporočilo Mednarodne zveze za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov, naj se 0,3 % BDP nameni za nacionalne ukrepe za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti;
Welcomes the recommendation made by IUCN for 0,3% of GDP to be spent on national biodiversity conservation measures;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je število projektov, financiranih iz programa LIFE+, v več državah članicah vsako leto pod okvirno dodelitvijo; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni razloge za to nezadostno izvajanje ter po potrebi predlaga spremembe pravil za ta program, zlasti v zvezi z ravnmi financiranja;
Notes with concern that the number of projects financed under the LIFE+ programme each year is below the indicative allocation in various Member States; invites the Commission to assess the reasons for this under-implementation and where necessary to propose changes to the rules governing the programme, particularly as regards co-financing levels;
je prepričan, da le javna poraba ne bo zadostovala za uresničitev glavnega cilja EU, in poudarja, da mora družbena odgovornost podjetij vključevati tudi vidik biotske raznovrstnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči načine izvajanja politik, ki spodbujajo pozitivne naložbe v ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in odvračajo od naložb, ki vplivajo nanjo, tako v javnem kot v zasebnem sektorju; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija vzpostavila platformo za podjetja in biotsko raznovrstnost, da bi vključila zasebni sektor v agendo o biotski raznovrstnosti;
Is convinced that public spending alone will not suffice to reach the EU headline target and underlines the importance of corporate responsibility to also take into account biodiversity; calls on the Commission to look into means of implementing policies that encourage positive investments in conserving biodiversity and discourage investment which impacts on biodiversity, in both the public and private sectors; welcomes in this regard the launch of the Business and Biodiversity Platform by the Commission to engage the private sector in the biodiversity agenda;
priporoča večjo prilagodljivost pravil o upravičenosti do financiranja projektov, povezanih z biotsko raznovrstnostjo, da bi spodbudili vse zadevne akterje, da se prijavijo zanj;
Recommends that greater flexibility be injected into the rules on eligibility for financing biodiversity-related projects and to encourage all the relevant players to apply for it;
poudarja potrebo po vključitvi zunanjih stroškov, tveganj in učinkov, kot so ohranjanje kmetijskih zemljišč, škoda, povzročena za biotsko raznovrstnost, ali stroškov podpiranja biotske raznovrstnosti, v končno ceno izdelkov na trgu; poudarja, da je to dolgoročno v interesu podjetij, če želijo ohraniti dostop do naravnih virov; nujno poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj čim prej objavi napovedano sporočilo o prihodnjem financiranju omrežja Natura 2000, vsekakor pa v letu 2010, da bi do leta ta vidik lahko preučili skupaj z novo strategijo 2020 o biotski raznovrstnosti;
Underlines the need to incorporate external costs, risks and effects, such as the preservation of agricultural land, the damage done to biodiversity or the costs incurred to support biodiversity, into the final price of products on the market; points out that this is in the long-term interest of companies if they wish to continue to have access to natural resources; urges the European Commission to publish the communication that it has announced on the future financing of Natura 2000 as soon as possible and in any event during 2010 so that this aspect can be examined together with the new biodiversity strategy for the period up to 2020;
Baza podatkov in znanja
Data and knowledge base