natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da sta zrušenje finančnega sistema ter počasen odziv nanj v Evropi kruto opozorila na institucionalne in politične omejitve integracijskega projekta Evropske unije ter na pomanjkanje solidarnosti, ki bi omogočila uporabo resnično skupnega pristopa;
Stresses that the meltdown of the financial system and the slow speed of reaction to it in Europe have cruelly exposed the institutional and political limits of the European Union’s integration project and the lack of the solidarity that would have allowed a genuinely common response to be embarked upon;
odločno kritizira dejstvo, da so voditelji Evropske unije kljub pogostemu omenjanju skupnega evropskega delovanja in solidarnosti na eni strani ter svoji nesposobnosti, da bi se na začetku oktobra 2008 dogovorili o skupni evropski reševalni akciji, na drugi strani, namesto tega začeli politiko „prosjači svojega soseda“ s konkurenčnimi nacionalnimi sistemi za jamčenje vlog in pomoč bankam, da bi preprečili odtekanje prihrankov v druge države članice Evropske unije;
Strongly criticises the fact that European Union leaders, for all their customary talk of collective European action and solidarity on the one hand and their inability to agree on a joint European rescue operation at the beginning of October 2008 on the other, instead started a ‘beggar thy neighbour’ policy of competing national schemes to guarantee deposits and prop up banks in order to prevent outflows of savings towards other EU Member States;
ugotavlja, da je Svet večinoma potrdil sveženj ukrepov, predlaganih v akcijskem načrtu članic evroobmočja z dne 12. oktobra 2008 v Parizu; meni, da se je Svet s tem strinjal zgolj o osnovnih pravilih za nacionalne načrte za dokapitalizacijo bančnih sistemov ter zagotovitev zavarovanja za oživitev medbančnih posojil, ni pa jasno opredelil, kako je treba reševati številna čezmejna vprašanja, ki so se pojavila; meni, da bi sistem dokapitalizacije v Združenem kraljestvu z delno nacionalizacijo bank lahko bil začetek bolj sistematičnega pristopa;
Notes that the Council mainly confirmed the package of measures proposed in the euro area countries’ action plan of 12 October 2008 in Paris; considers that the Council thus only agreed on ground rules for national plans to re-capitalise the banking systems and to provide insurance to revive inter-bank lending, without clarifying how to solve the numerous cross-border issues which have arisen; considers, however, that the UK recapitalisation scheme with part-nationalisation of banks could be a starting point for a more systematic approach;
poudarja, da je treba čim prej zagotoviti absolutno jamstvo za vloge malih in srednjih varčevalcev po vsej Evropski uniji; zaradi tega pozdravlja predlog Komisije o spremembi direktive EU o sistemih zajamčenih vlog, čeprav je prišel nekoliko pozno; se strinja s Komisijo, da je treba vloge jamčiti do ravni 100 % ter da je treba obdobje izplačil zmanjšati na 3 dni po propadu banke; vendar vztraja, da je treba raven jamstva 100 000 EUR enotno uporabljati po celotni Evropski uniji;
Points out that, as a matter of priority, deposits of small and medium savers must be absolutely guaranteed across the entire European Union; welcomes, therefore, the Commission proposal to amend the EU Directive on Deposit Guarantee Schemes, although this is coming late; agrees with the Commission that deposits must be guaranteed up to 100% of the coverage level and that the payout period must be reduced to 3 days after the failure of a bank; insists, however, on a coverage level of at least EUR 100 000 to be applied uniformly throughout the European Union;
podpira ukrepe za dokapitalizacijo bank z nakupom želenega bančnega premoženja namesto, da država kupuje premoženje od njih ter tako 'socializira izgube špekulantov'; podpira tudi ukrepe za zagotavljanje državnega jamstva za zavarovanje dolga, usmerjanje likvidnosti in ustvarjanje kreditov preko Evropske centralne banke in centralnih bank z namenom pravilnega delovanja medbančnega posojanja in za zaostritev nadzora nad celotnim finančnim sektorjem;
Supports measures to recapitalise banks by buying up preferred banking stock instead of the State buying toxic assets from them and thus ‘socialising the losses of the speculators’; also supports measures to provide government guarantees for senior bank debt insurance, to steer liquidity and credit creation via the ECB and central banks with a view to the proper functioning of inter-bank lending and to tighten the oversight of the entire financial sector;
podpira pobudo Evropske konfederacije sindikatov (ETUC) v korist evropskega sodelovanja, kot ga sedaj predvideva Svet; poudarja, da mora ta pobuda skladno obravnavati skupno delovanje za reševanje čezmejnih večnacionalnih bančnih skupin in opustiti sedanje 'protekcionistične' politike;
Supports the initiative of the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) in favour of a European cooperation such as is now envisaged by the Council; points out that such an initiative must coherently tackle joint rescue operations for cross-border multinational banking groups and abandon the current ‘beggar-thy-European-neighbour’ policies;
meni, da so 'načela', ki jih je predvidel Svet za reševanje finančnega sektorja, preveč nejasna in neskladna ter puščajo širok manevrski prostor za različna tolmačenja; vztraja, da mora sistem jamstva EU temeljiti na strogih pogojih, ki jih mora izpolnjevati bančni sektor, ko prejema javno pomoč; s tem v zvezi poudarja, da mora finančni sektor zopet delovati v javnem interesu ter sprejeti nižje donose in nagrajevanje pri plačilnih sistemih, da bi se izognili tveganju in dosegali dolgoročne namesto kratkoročne dobičke;
Considers that the ‘principles’ envisaged by the Council to rescue the financial sector are much too vague and incoherent and leave a wide margin for different interpretations; insists that the EU’s bail-out scheme must be based on strict conditions that the banking sector has to comply with when receiving public assistance; stresses in this context that the financial sector must be brought back to functioning in the public interest and accepting lower returns and bonus payment systems geared to risk aversion and long-term targets instead of short-term profits;
poudarja, da mora biti pristop z dokapitalizacijo usmerjen k trajnostni nacionalizaciji bančnega zdravega premoženja, z namenom podružbljanja celotnega bančnega sektorja ter vzpostavitve finančnega težišča v javni lasti, ki bo usmerjalo kredite v družbeno in okoljsko koristne naložbe, ki bodo ustvarjale kakovostna delovna mesta; meni, da mora sprejemanje odločitev o kreditni politiki bančnega sektorja priti pod demokratičen javni nadzor z demokratičnim sodelovanjem zaposlenih in potrošnikov;
Points out that the recapitalisation approach must be steered towards a sustainable nationalisation of the banks’ healthy assets, with a view to the full socialisation of the banking sector and the constitution of a publicly owned financial pole that steers credit towards socially and environmentally useful investments which create good-quality employment; considers that decision making on the banking sector’s credit policies must come under democratic public control, with democratic participation by employees and consumers;
podpira zahtevo Sveta po dosledni uporabi (s strani finančnih institucij) priporočil glede preglednosti njihovih zavezanosti in tveganj; poudarja tudi, da so same zahteve po preglednosti nezadostne ter da je potrebna strožja zakonska ureditev finančnega trga;
Supports the Council’s call for rigorous implementation by financial institutions of recommendations on the transparency of their commitments and risks; stresses, however, that mere transparency requirements are insufficient and that a stricter regulation of financial markets is necessary;
podpira poziv Sveta k okrepitvi pravil za bonitetne agencija in njihov nadzor na evropski ravni; predlaga ustanovitev evropske javne bonitetne agencije za reševanje navzkrižja interesov, ki ovirajo postopek ocenjevanja bonitete;
Supports the Council’s call for the rules on rating agencies to be strengthened and for their supervision at European level; proposes the establishment of a public European Credit Rating Agency in order to overcome conflicts of interest which impair the credit rating process;
pozdravlja namero Sveta, da vzpostavi neformalno opozarjanje, izmenjavo informacij in mehanizem ocenjevanja; podpira tudi načrt Sveta s tem v zvezi za skupino na visoki ravni, ki naj jo ustanovi Komisija; poudarja pa, da je potrebna strožja zakonska ureditev finančnih trgov, da se prepreči sistemsko tveganje, ki ga povzročajo novi in tvegani proizvodi, ki morajo biti prepovedani ali pa je treba njihovo trženje strogo omejiti in nadzirati; poudarja tudi, da stroge omejitve za finančne vzvode za vse regulirane finančne institucije in da je treba nujno uvesti strožja pravila o kapitalski ustreznosti bank; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj razširijo okvir zaupanja in ureditve EU ter usklajevanje, da bo odražalo vse vire sistemskega tveganja, zlasti z vključitvijo subjektov finančnih vzvodov, ki nosijo sistemsko tveganje v teh okvirih ne glede na njihovo pravno obliko ali sedež;
Welcomes the intention of the Council to establish an informal warning, information exchange and evaluation mechanism; supports also the Council’s plan in this context for a high-level group to be set up by the Commission; underlines, however, that stricter regulation of financial markets is needed to prevent systemic risks caused by new and risky financial products, which must either be prohibited or their trading severely restricted and monitored; stresses furthermore that strict limits on leverage for all regulated financial institutions and stricter rules on banks’ capital adequacy must be introduced as a matter of urgency; calls on the Commission and the Member States to expand the EU’s prudential and regulatory framework and coordination to reflect all sources of systemic risk, in particular by including leveraged entities carrying systemic risk in such a framework regardless of their legal form or seat;
poudarja, da pokojninskim skladom, zlasti poklicnim pokojninskim skladom ne bi smeli dovoliti naložb v finančne proizvode, kot so hedge skladi ali zasebne delniške sklade, ki imajo za posledico sistemsko tveganje, ker bi imel neuspeh teh skladov negativen vpliv na pokojninske pravice; meni, da je treba ustrezno revidirati Direktivo 2003/41/ES o dejavnostih in nadzoru institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje;
Points out that pension funds, and especially occupational pension funds, must not be allowed to invest in financial products such as hedge funds and private equity that entail systemic risks, because failure of such funds would negatively affect pension entitlements; considers that Directive 2003/41/EC on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision must be reviewed accordingly;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za končanje davčnih oaz in obravnavajo probleme, nastale z offshore finančnimi središči, da uvedejo davke na devizne transakcije (Tobinov davek) ter na borzne transakcije (vključno s transakcijami na prostem trgu), da ustavijo privatizacijo pokojnin ter okrepijo javni pokojninski in bančni sistem;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt measures to close down tax havens and tackle the problems created by offshore financial centres, to introduce taxes on currency transactions (Tobin Tax) and stock exchange transactions (including Over-the-Counter transactions), to stop pension privatisations and to strengthen public pension and banking systems;
poudarja, da mora Evropska unija združiti svoje reševalno delovanje, namenjeno stabilizaciji bančnega in kreditnega sistema z ukrepi za oživitev in stabilizacijo 'pravega gospodarstva' na poti k okoljsko in socialno trajnostnemu razvoju; pozdravlja sklep Evropske investicijske banke, da uporabi 30 milijard EUR za podporo evropskih malih in srednjih podjetij ter njeno zavezanost, da poveča svojo sposobnost posredovanja pri infrastrukturnih projektih kot prvi pozitivni korak, vendar poudarja, da je znesek 30 milijard EUR nezadosten; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj nadaljujeta v tej smeri in pripravita evropski investicijski program za trajnostni razvoj, zaposlovanje in socialno vključenost, ki bo znašal vsaj 1 % BDP EU in ki bi ga dopolnili s podobnimi javnimi investicijskimi programi na strani držav članic, da bi utrdili gospodarstvo in ukrepali proti podnebnim spremembam ter spodbujali polno zaposlenost s kakovostnimi delovnimi mesti in socialnimi pravicami;
Stresses that the European Union needs to combine its rescue operation designed to stabilise the banking and credit system with measures to revive and stabilise the ‘real economy’, setting it on a path towards environmentally and socially sustainable development; welcomes the European Investment Bank’s decision to mobilise EUR 30 billion to support European SMEs and its undertaking to step up its ability to intervene in infrastructure projects as a positive first step, but points out that the amount of EUR 30 billion is insufficient; calls on the Commission and the Council to go further in this direction by drawing up a ‘European Investment Programme for Sustainable Development, Employment and Social Inclusion’ of at least 1 % of EU GDP, which should be complemented by similar public investment programmes on the part of the Member States in order to stabilise the economy, counter climate change and promote full employment with high-quality jobs and social rights;
poudarja, da je treba Evropski investicijski banki ter Evropski banki za obnovo in razvoj zagotoviti potrebna sredstva za učinkovito povečanje kreditnih linij po zelo nizki obrestni meri za mala in srednja podjetja, ekološko proizvodnjo in storitve, socialne in zdravstvene službe itd., pod pogojem, da ti ustvarjajo kakovostna delovna mesta s socialnimi pravicami, primerno plačilo in delovne pogoje;
Points out that the EIB and the EBRD must be provided with the resources needed to increase drastically their credit lines at very low interest rates for SMEs, ecological production and services, social and health services etc., on condition that these create high-quality employment with social rights and decent pay and working conditions;
poudarja, da mora sedaj Evropa sprejeti realno rast plač, ki nadomešča povečanje produktivnosti in inflacije ter tudi začne s prerazporejanjem, ki temelji na deležu plač v bruto nacionalnem dohodku; opozarja Evropsko centralno banko, Komisijo in Svet, da je velika depresija iz leta 1930 dobila dobro podlago le zato, ker so delodajalci začeli zniževati plače in kriza je preskočila iz finančnega trga na trg blaga in storitev;
Stresses that Europe now needs to accept real wage growth that compensates for productivity increases and inflation and also embarks on a redistribution aimed at increasing the wage share in Gross National Income; reminds the ECB, the Commission and the Council that the Great Depression of the 1930s only took a firm grip when employers started to cut wages and the crisis jumped over from the financial market to the goods and services market;
predlaga, da bi poleg tega države članice uvedle ukrepe za stabilizacijo in izboljšanje kupne moči, zlasti tistih z nizkimi dohodki (naraščanje cen hrane, energije, prevoza), na primer z uvedbo socialnih tarif za plin, elektriko, telekomunikacije, javni prevoz itd.;
Proposes that Member States also introduce measures to stabilise and enhance purchasing power, especially of low-income people (rising prices for food, energy, transport), for example by introducing social default tariffs for gas, electricity, telecommunications, public transport etc.;
pozdravlja nedavno znižanje obrestne mere s strani Evropske centralne banke za nadaljnjo sprostitev monetarne politike, da bi kljubovala pričakovani gospodarski recesiji; kritizira dejstvo, da je znižanje obrestne mere prišlo prepozno, da bi imelo večje pozitivne učinke; poudarja, da se hkrati že zmanjšuje nevarnost inflacije v vseh industrializiranih državah ter da je treba preprečiti deflacijske pritiske;
Welcomes the recent interest rate cut by the ECB and calls on the ECB to further relax its monetary policy in order to counter the coming economic downturn; criticises the fact that the interest rate cut came too late to have greater positive effects; stresses that the inflation threat is already receding across the industrialised countries simultaneously and that deflationary pressures must be prevented;
poudarja, da se pojavlja soglasje o tem, da se v razmerah finančne krize pakt stabilnosti in rasti ne bo uporabljal, kar je pravilno; vseeno meni, da je treba pakt stabilnosti in rasti razveljaviti; kritizira, da se Svet ne zmeni za nove razmere, saj zahteva, da se nadaljuje s proračunskimi politikami, da bi bili v skladu z revidiranim paktom o stabilnosti in rasti;
Emphasises that there seems to be an emerging consensus that the Stability and Growth Pact shall not be applied in a situation of financial crisis, which is a step in the right direction; considers, however, that the Stability and Growth Pact must be revoked; criticises the fact that the Council is ignoring the new situation by calling for budget policies to continue to be in line with the revised Stability and Growth Pact;
poudarja dejstvo, da se bo sedanja lizbonska strategija Evropske unije iztekla leta 2010 ter da je treba kmalu pripraviti prihodnjo strategijo Evropske unije; poudarja, da je treba opustiti osredotočenost na liberalizacijo trga in konkurenčnost in jo nadomestiti z novo celovito evropsko strategijo za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj, ki bo temeljila na štirih enako pomembnih stebrih (gospodarstvo, okolje, zaposlovanje ter socialno varstvo in vključenost);
Highlights the fact that the European Union’s current Lisbon Strategy will reach its end in 2010 and a future EU strategy must be drawn up soon; emphasises that the current focus on market liberalisation and ‘competitiveness’ must be abandoned and replaced by a new integrated European Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development which is based on four pillars of equal weighting (economy, environment, employment and social protection and inclusion);
Lizbonska pogodba
placeCityLisbon Treaty
obžaluje dejstvo, da je Svet ponovno zavrnil upoštevanje demokratičnega glasovanja Ircev ter je vztrajal na nadaljevanju ratifikacije lizbonske pogodbe; poziva Svet, naj se kaj nauči iz izidov referendumov o osnutku ustavne pogodbe v Franciji in na Nizozemskem ter zavrnitve lizbonske pogodbe na Irskem, ki so jasno pokazali na odpor evropskih državljanov do neoliberalnih politik in militarizacije Evropske unije; meni, da bo neuspeh evropskih institucij, da bi izpolnile pričakovanja evropskih državljanov, močno poglobil krizo legitimnosti Evropske unije; vztraja, da Svet ustavi postopek ratifikacije ter začne s poglobljeno revizijo pogodb, da bi utrli pot demokratični, socialni in miroljubni Evropi;
Regrets the fact that the Council again refused to respect the democratic vote of the people of Ireland and has insisted on continuing the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty; calls on the Council to learn the lessons of the outcome of the referenda on the Constitutional Treaty in France and the Netherlands and the rejection of the Lisbon Treaty in Ireland, which clearly reflected opposition to the neoliberal policy and militarisation of the European Union; considers that a failure of the European Institutions to meet the aspirations of citizens in Europe will result in a dramatic deepening of the crisis of legitimacy of the EU; insists that the Council halt the ratification process and initiate a profound revision of the Treaties in order to open the road to a democratic, social and peaceful Europe;
poudarja, da se finančna kriza ne sme uporabiti kot izgovor za zanemarjanje zavezanosti podnebnim spremembam ter poudarja, da je pomembno ohranjati raven ciljev energetsko-podnebnega svežnja; ponovno poudarja zavezanost sklenitvi sporazuma o energetsko-podnebnem svežnju do konca letošnjega leta ter zahteva, naj v tem prizadevanju Svet in Komisija sodelujeta z Evropskim parlamentom;
Stresses that the financial crisis should not be used as an excuse to backtrack on climate change commitments and emphasises that it is crucial to maintain the level of ambition of the energy-climate package; reaffirms its commitment to reaching an agreement on the energy-climate package by the end of this year and asks the Council and Commission to work closely with the EP in this endeavour;
ponovno potrjuje, da je pomembno najpozneje do decembra 2009 v Köbenhavnu skleniti nov celovit mednarodni sporazum o podnebnih spremembah pod okriljem okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja, in meni, da je v zvezi s tem izjemnega pomena skleniti dogovor z ambicioznimi cilji energetsko-podnebnega svežnja, ki bo Evropski uniji tudi omogočal, da bo ohranjala vodilno vlogo v pogajanjih o globalnih podnebnih spremembah; zato obžaluje, da si nekatere države članice prizadevajo podnebni sveženj Evropske unije spremeniti tako, da bi lahko bila ogrožena sposobnost Evropske unije, da doseže svoje cilje, kot so bili dogovorjeni marca 2007;
Reaffirms the importance of reaching a new comprehensive international agreement on climate change under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change no later than December 2009 in Copenhagen and considers that reaching an agreement with ambitious targets on the energy-climate package will also allow the EU to maintain its leadership position in the global climate change negotiations; regrets, therefore, that some Member States are pushing to have the EU climate change package amended in a way that could undermine the EU’s ability to meet its own targets as agreed in March 2007;
pozdravlja štiri zakonodajne predloge Komisije, ki tvorijo podnebni in energetski sveženj in katerega revizija dovoljenj za sisteme trgovanja z emisijami predstavlja glavni vidik doseganja cilja Evropske unije za znižanje toplogrednih plinov; poziva Svet in države članice, naj jamčijo okoljsko celovitost sistema, tako da ne dovolijo povečevanj kreditov v okviru lastnega razvojnega mehanizma in mehanizmov skupnega izvajanja ter da upoštevajo načelo, po katerem onesnaževalec plača, da energetskemu sektorju ne dajejo brezplačnih dodelitev ter da namenijo prihodke od dražb blaženju podnebnih sprememb in ukrepom prilagajanja.
Welcomes the Commission’s four legislative proposals forming the climate and energy package, in which the revision of the emission permit trading scheme constitutes a major aspect of achieving the EU’s greenhouse gas reduction target; calls on the Council and the Member States to guarantee the environmental integrity of the scheme by not allowing any increase in credits under own-development and joint-implementation mechanisms, to respect the ‘polluter pays’ principle by granting no free allocations to the power sector and to earmark auctioning revenues for climate mitigation and adaptation measures;
poudarja, da so energetska učinkovitost in obnovljivi viri energije najboljša podlaga evropske strategije o energetski varnosti; poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, naj določijo cilj Evropske unije za obvezno zmanjšanje izgube energije za 20% do leta 2020 ter s tem sprožijo prihranke pri stroških ter okoljske in ekonomske koristi po vsej Evropi;
Points out that energy efficiency and renewable energies are the best foundation for a European strategy on energy security; urges the Council, the Commission and the Member States to make the EU objective of cutting energy waste by 20% by 2020 mandatory, thereby triggering cost savings and environmental and economic benefits across Europe;
Energetska politika
Energy Policies