natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
spodbuja Komisijo, naj razjasni včasih nejasne odnose med nacionalnimi organi za varstvo konkurence in njihovimi "nacionalnimi prvaki", da bi odvrnila vse sume o povezanosti in da bi zaščitila interese potrošnikov, saj so na primer v začetku leta 2005 mediji razkrili skrite dogovore med tremi največjimi francoskimi operaterji mobilne telefonije; priznava, da ni preteklo dovolj časa, da bi lahko ocenili učinkovitost reform, ki izvajanje protimonopolne zakonodaje ES decentralizirajo na raven nacionalnih organov za varstvo konkurenco; opozarja, da je Evropska mreža organov za varstvo konkurence, ki jo sestavljajo Komisija in nacionalni organi za varstvo konkurence, forum za sodelovanje in je kot organizacija nujno potrebna za doslednejšo in učinkovitejšo uporabo pravil ES o konkurenci, ter poziva njene člane, naj v tej organizaciji bolj dejavno sodelujejo in dajo zalet njenemu ogromnemu potencialu v skladu s strateško vlogo, ki jo ima politika konkurence v Evropski uniji;
Encourages the Commission to clarify the occasionally obscure relationships among NCAs and 'national champions', so as to remove any suspicion of complicity and safeguard consumers' interests (for instance, at the beginning of 2005 the media revealed secret agreements between the three main French mobile telephony operators); recognises that there has been insufficient time so far to assess the effectiveness of the reforms devolving the implementation of EC competition law to NCAs; points out that the ECN, which is comprised of the Commission and the NCAs, is a cooperation forum and is essential, as a body, for the strengthening of the consistency and effectiveness of the application of the EC competition rules, and urges its members to play an active part in that body and to provide impetus for its enormous potential in accordance with the strategic role given to competition policy in the EU;
čestita Komisiji za njeno skrbno spremljanje primerov združitev in nakupov, ki bi lahko vodili v okrepitev prevladujočih položajev;
Congratulates the Commission on its vigilance with regard to the regulation of mergers and acquisitions that could lead to the strengthening of dominant positions;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker še vedno ni uspela liberalizacija trgov EU na področju plina in elektrike ter pozdravlja sektorsko preiskavo Komisije na področju delovanja notranjega trga s plinom in elektriko;
Expresses its concern at the continued failure to achieve full liberalisation on the EU gas and electricity markets and welcomes the sector inquiry launched by the Commission into the functioning of the internal market in gas and electricity;
pozdravlja sektorske preiskave, ki jih je sprožila Komisija, v zvezi s sistemi bančnih plačil in poslovnimi zavarovanji, hkrati pa poziva, naj postopek preiskave poteka tako, da zagotovi dovolj časa za pripravo popolnih in temeljitih odgovorov Komisiji;
Welcomes the sector inquiries launched by the Commission in relation to bank payment systems and business insurance, but urges that the inquiry process be undertaken in a way that allows adequate time for full and thorough responses to the Commission;
predlaga, da morajo v primeru velikih omrežnih javnih storitev konkurenco obvladovati zavezujoče obveznosti javnih storitev, zato da so zagotovljene nujne naložbe in se prepreči nastanek novih monopolov;
Suggests that in the case of major networked public services, competition must be guided by strong public service obligations so as to ensure necessary investment and prevent the emergence of new monopolies;
se zaveda pomena učinkovite politike o konkurenci za uresničitev Lizbonske strategije;
Recognises the important contribution which an effective competition policy makes to the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy;
pozdravlja okolju prijazna merila, ki jih je Komisija uporabila pri potrjevanju več shem za okoljsko pomoč, vključno z merili za železniški promet, in poziva Komisijo, naj pogoje za preglednost takšnih shem razvije še naprej, da bi takšni projekti predstavljali zgled za druge regije in države članice;
Welcomes the environmentally friendly criteria of the Commission applied in the approval of several environmental aid schemes, including those concerning rail transport, and urges the Commission to develop further the conditions for transparency for such schemes, so that they may serve as precedents for other regions and Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj brani svojo doktrino boja proti monopolom in nezakonitim dogovorom ter utemeljene obrazložitve državnih pomoči v bodočih pogajanjih o organizaciji mednarodne trgovine; Komisijo poziva tudi, naj spodbuja mednarodno sodelovanje na področju konkurence s pomočjo instrumentov večstranske ali dvostranske narave in novo nastale države in države v razvoju spodbuja, naj pri tem čedalje bolj sodelujejo;
Calls on the Commission to defend its doctrine of combating monopolies and illegal cartels and of providing reasons to justify State aid in future negotiations on the organisation of international trade; also urges the Commission to promote international cooperation in competition matters by means of instruments of a multilateral or bilateral nature and to encourage emerging and developing countries to participate increasingly in that cooperation;
poudarja, da je pomembno spodbujati obveščenost potrošnikov, opozarja na njeno poglavitno vlogo pri zagotavljanju prave kulture konkurence in prav tako poudarja, da je treba preučiti možnosti zasebnih odškodnin v primeru protikonkurenčnega obnašanja;
Highlights the importance of encouraging consumer information, draws attention to the fundamental role of consumer information in ensuring that there is a genuine competition culture, and points out the need to consider, at Community level, private compensation in cases of anti-competitive conduct;
ponovno izraža svojo podporo za bolj proaktivno vlogo Parlamenta pri razvoju politike konkurence z okrepitvijo pooblastil Parlamenta v postopku soodločanja;
Reaffirms its support for a more proactive role of Parliament in the development of competition policy by enhancing the co-decision powers of the Parliament;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej nadzoruje delovanje sodnega sistema v okviru konkurenčnih zadev, da se hitrost dostopa do sodstva po možnosti izboljša in da se pridobi čim več izkušenj in strokovnega znanja za sodnike, ki obravnavajo konkurenčne zadeve;
Urges the Commission to continue to review the operation of the judicial system in relation to competition cases in order to consider improvements to the speed of access to justice and in order to maximise the experience and skills of the judiciary dealing with competition cases;
poziva Komisijo, naj si pomaga z imenovanjem uradnika za stike s potrošniki z namenom razviti tesnejši dialog in boljše sodelovanje med Komisijo in potrošniki;
Urges the Commission to build on the appointment of a Consumer Liaison Officer in order to develop a closer dialogue and closer cooperation between the Commission and consumers;
verjame, da je učinkovito izvajanje politike o konkurenci pomembno sredstvo za pridobitev učinkovite tržne strukture, ki uveljavlja interese potrošnikov ter ima pozitiven in pomemben vpliv na njihovo vsakdanje življenje; želi poudariti, da tesnejša povezanost notranjega trga včasih omogoča bolj naravno analizo položaja konkurence na celotnem notranjem trgu in ne le na raznih podtrgih; in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi bolj jasne smernice o svoji opredelitvi "trga" v takšnih primerih;
Believes that the effective application of competition policy is an essential tool to achieving an efficient market structure, which operates in the interests of consumers and which has a positive and significant impact upon consumers' daily lives; wishes to emphasise that closer integration of the internal market sometimes makes it more natural to analyse the state of competition on the internal market as a whole rather than on different submarkets; and calls on the Commission to produce clearer guidelines on its market definition in such cases;
pozdravlja pozitivni odgovor Komisije na priporočila Parlamenta v zvezi z nadaljnjim razvojem evropskih dni konkurence, vključno s sodelovanjem potrošniških organizacij in nacionalnih medijev v procesu načrtovanja evropskih dni konkurence;
Welcomes the Commission's positive response to Parliament's recommendations concerning the further development of European Competition Days (ECDs), including the integration in the planning process of ECDs of consumer organisations and the national media;
v skladu z novimi smernicami spodbuja Komisijo, naj se osredotoči na pomembna vprašanja, predvsem na cilje Unije in vpliv na življenjske pogoje državljanov, ter naj se pri tem zavzame, da ne bo le reagirala na spremembe, ampak jih po potrebi tudi predvidela in spodbudila;
Encourages the Commission, in accordance with the new guidelines, to focus on relevant questions, predominantly on the Union's objectives and the impact on citizens" living conditions, committing itself not just to responding to change but also to anticipating change and to encouraging it when it is needed;
pozdravlja zavezo Komisije mednarodni mreži organov za varstvo konkurence, zlasti pri pomoči Kitajski pri razvoju osnutka protimonopolne zakonodaje;
Welcomes the Commission's continued commitment to the International Competition Network, particularly as regards its work undertaken in assisting China in the development of its draft antitrust law;
pozdravlja nenehno napredovanje desetih novih držav članic pri hitrem prilagajanju pravil konkurence, nadzoru ES pri združevanju in zlasti predpisom o državni pomoči ter poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s postopkom tehnične pomoči in sodelovanja;
Welcomes the continued progress which the ten new Member States are making in rapidly adapting to the competition rules, EC merger control and, in particular, State aid regulation and urges the Commission to pursue the process of technical assistance and cooperation;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o posebnem poročilu Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o osnutku priporočila Svetu Evropske unije v zvezi s pritožbo 2395/2003/GG glede odprtja sej Sveta za javnost, kadar slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca ( 2005/2243(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the Special Report from the European Ombudsman following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 2395/2003/GG concerning the openness of the meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity ( 2005/2243(INI) )
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po osnutku priporočila Svetu Evropske unije v zvezi s pritožbo 2395/2003/GG,
having regard to the Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 2395/2003/GG,
ob upoštevanju člena 1 Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Article 1 of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije UL L 145, 31.5.2001, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 255 Pogodbe ES o dostopu do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije,
having regard to Article 255 of the EC Treaty concerning access to documents of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission,
ob upoštevanju členov 195 in 207 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 195 and 207 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Laakenske izjave o prihodnosti Evropske unije Priloga I k sklepom predsedsedstva z zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Laeknu dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001.
having regard to the Laeken Declaration on the future of the European Union Annex I to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of Laeken of 14 and 15 December 2001.
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Sevilli dne 21. in 22. junija 2002,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Seville European Council of 21 and 22 June 2002,
ob upoštevanju člena 3(7) Statuta Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic UL L 113, 4.5.1994, str.
having regard to Article 3(7) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 195(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 45 and 195(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0056/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0056/2006 ),
ker člen 195 Pogodbe ES pooblašča Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za sprejemanje pritožb državljanov Unije glede nepravilnosti pri dejavnostih institucij ali organov Skupnosti,
whereas Article 195 of the EC Treaty empowers the European Ombudsman to receive complaints from any citizen of the Union concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies,
ker so pritožniki v pritožbi 2395/2003/GG Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic trdili, da seje Sveta, ko zaseda v vlogi zakonodajalca, ne potekajo v skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU in so za javnost odprte le v obsegu, kot to predvidevata člena 8 in 9 Poslovnika Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002, naknadno spremenjenega 22. marca 2004 UL L 106, 15.4.2004, str.
whereas the complainants in complaint 2395/2003/GG to the European Ombudsman alleged that meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity are not consistent with Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty and are only open to the extent provided for in Articles 8 and 9 of the Council's Rules of Procedure of 22 July 2002, subsequently amended on 22 March 2004 OJ L 106, 15.4.2004, p.
ker pritožniki menijo, da bi morale biti seje Sveta, kadar ta nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, odprte za javnost, in v ta namen zahtevajo spremembo Poslovnika Sveta,
whereas the complainants considered that meetings of the Council acting in its legislative capacity should be public and requested a change in the Council's Rules of Procedure to that effect,
ker v skladu s členom 12(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 in členom 7 Poslovnika Sveta, kakor je bil spremenjen, Svet nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca v smislu drugega pododstavka člena 207(3) Pogodbe ES, kadar sprejema predpise, ki so pravno zavezujoči v državah članicah ali zanje v obliki uredb, direktiv, okvirnih sklepov ali sklepov na podlagi ustreznih določb v Pogodbah, z izjemo razprav, ki vodijo k sprejetju notranjih ukrepov, upravnih ali proračunskih aktov, aktov, ki se nanašajo na medinstitucionalne ali mednarodne odnose ali nezavezujočih aktov (kot so zaključki, priporočila ali resolucije),
whereas, under Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and Article 7 of the Council's Rules of Procedure, as amended, the Council acts in its legislative capacity within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 207(3) of the EC Treaty when it adopts rules which are legally binding in or for the Member States, by means of regulations, directives, framework decisions or decisions, on the basis of the relevant provisions of the Treaties, with the exception of discussions leading to the adoption of internal measures, administrative or budgetary acts, acts concerning inter-institutional or international relations or non-binding acts (such as conclusions, recommendations or resolutions),
ker je v smislu zgornje opredelitve zakonodajne dejavnosti Sveta njegova nezakonodajna dejavnost sorazmerno manjša v primerjavi z njegovo zakonodajno dejavnostjo in ker bi moralo zato pri odločanju veljati pravilo preglednosti, zaupnost pa naj bi veljala le v primeru nezakonodajne dejavnosti, kjer je to primerno,
whereas, according to the above definition of its legislative activity, the Council's non-legislative activity accounts for a far smaller proportion than its legislative activity, and whereas transparency should accordingly be the rule in respect of its deliberations, confidentiality applying only to its non-legislative activity, where appropriate,
ker se v skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU odločitve v Evropski uniji sprejemajo "čim bolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani",
whereas, pursuant to Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty, decisions in the EU should be taken "as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizens",
ker je dne 19. novembra 2003 generalni sekretar Sveta Solana v odgovoru na odprto pismo pritožnikov navedel, da obstaja široka podpora za odprtje zakonodajnih posvetovanj Sveta za javnost,
whereas, on 19 November 2003, Mr Solana, the Council's Secretary General, in his reply to the complainants' open letter stated that opening up the Council's legislative deliberations to the public was an issue that found the very widest support,
ker je Svet v odgovoru Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic priznal velik pomen načela odprtosti za javnost, ki je, med drugim opredeljeno s členom 1(2) Pogodbe EU,
whereas the Council, in its reply to the Ombudsman, acknowledged that the principle of openness laid down inter alia in Article 1(2) of the EU Treaty is of great importance,
ker Svet v svojem poslovniku, kakor je bil spremenjen leta 2004, uvaja večjo dostopnost za javnost tistih sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca,
whereas the Council, in its Rules of Procedure, as amended in 2004, introduced rules that provide for greater openness as regards the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity,
ker so države članice oktobra 2004 podpisale Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo, ki vsebuje izrecno določbo, da se Svet, ko se posvetuje in glasuje o zakonodajnih aktih, sestaja ob navzočnosti javnosti,
whereas, in October 2004, the Member States signed the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which contains an express provision to the effect that the Council is to meet in public when considering and voting on draft legislative acts,
ker Svet v odgovoru na posebna vprašanja Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ni navedel nobenih ovir za izvajanje sprememb svojega poslovnika, kot so zahtevali pritožniki, niti se ni skliceval na načela ali višje cilje, na podlagi katerih bi upravičeno zavrnil dostop javnosti do sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, ter hkrati trdil, da je sprejetje lastnega poslovnika politično in institucionalno vprašanje, o katerem odloča Svet sam,
whereas, in its reply to specific questions from the Ombudsman, the Council did not mention any obstacles to the implementation of the amendment of its Rules of Procedure, as requested by the complainants, nor any principles or aims of a higher order that would entitle it to refuse to open to the public the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity, but contended that the adoption of its Rules of Procedure was a political and institutional matter to be decided upon by the Council itself,
ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic v svojem letnem poročilu za leto 1997 http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report97/pdf/en/rap97_en.pdf
whereas, in his Annual Report for 1997 http://www.euro-ombudsman.eu.int/report97/pdf/en/rap97_en.pdf
opredelil kot nepravilnost tako delovanje javnega organa, ki ni v skladu z zanj zavezujočimi pravili ali načeli,
, the European Ombudsman considered that maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it,
ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic ugotovil, da zavračanje javnosti sej Sveta brez utemeljenega razloga, kadar deluje v vlogi zakonodajalca, pomeni nepravilnost,
whereas the Ombudsman concluded that the fact that the Council refused to decide to meet publicly whenever it acts in its legislative capacity without giving good reasons for that refusal was an instance of maladministration,
ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic v osnutku priporočila Svetu v skladu s členom 3(6) Statuta Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic navedel: "Svet Evropske unije bi moral ponovno preučiti zavrnitev odprtja za javnost tistih svojih sej, na katerih nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca"; ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic v svojem posebnem poročilu ponovil svoje priporočilo Svetu in predlagal, da Evropski parlament obravnava morebitno sprejetje njegovega priporočila v resoluciji,
whereas, in his draft recommendation to the Council pursuant to Article 3(6) of the Statute of the European Ombudsman, the Ombudsman stated that: "The Council of the European Union should review its refusal to decide to meet publicly whenever it is acting in its legislative capacity"; whereas, in his Special Report, the Ombudsman reiterated his recommendation to the Council and suggested that the European Parliament consider adopting his recommendation as a resolution,
ker, zlasti kadar Svet sprejema akte pod "točko A", razprava in zakonodajno delo dejansko potekata v odboru COREPER in omenjene akte Svet samo odobri,
whereas, in particular when the Council adopts acts as "A-points", the actual debate and legislative work is done by Permanent Representatives Committee (COREPER) and the acts in question are merely approved by the Council,
ker Svet kot zakonodajalec deluje tudi na sejah spravnih odborov,
whereas the Council also acts in its legislative capacity in the meetings of the conciliation committees,
ker načelo javne odgovornosti ministrov predvideva, da so stališča in odločitve držav članic pri glasovanju v Svetu znana javnosti,
whereas the accountability and public responsibility of ministers require that Member States' positions and votes in the Council be known to the public,
ker zakonodajni veji EU še vedno delujeta na podlagi deloma različnih informacij; ker so dokumenti, ki jih hrani Parlament, večinoma javni, medtem ko Svet pogosto dela tudi z dokumenti in podatki, označenimi kot zaupni, vključno takrat, ko obravnava vprašanja, o katerih se odloča s postopkom soodločanja,
whereas the two legislative branches of the EU still work on the basis of partially different sets of information; whereas the documents held by Parliament are in general public, while the Council often works also on the basis of classified documents and information, including when it considers certain questions which require adoption under the codecision procedure,
ker je britansko predsedstvo Sveta podalo dva alternativna predloga za odziv na priporočila Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, pri čemer eden od njiju vključuje spremembo Poslovnika Sveta, z drugim pa bi si prizadevali za večjo preglednost znotraj veljavnih predpisov,
whereas the UK Presidency made two alternative proposals to the Council with the aim of responding to the Ombudsman's recommendations, one of which would have involved amending the Council's Rules of Procedure, while the other merely sought to improve transparency within the scope of the existing rules,
ker se je Svet za tem odločil, da ne bo spremenil svojega poslovnika,
whereas the Council subsequently chose not to amend its Rules of Procedure,
podpira priporočilo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Svetu;
Εndorses the European Ombudsman's recommendation to the Council;