natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da mora ta akcijski načrt dosegati specifične, opazne, dosegljive, smotrne in časovno določene cilje ter kjer je to ustrezno zlasti oblikovati pregledna pravila za oddajo javnih naročil, ki so skladna z mednarodnimi standardi in ki ne omejujejo konkurenčnosti mednarodnih ponudnikov s postavljanjem velikih notranjih upravnih ovir; nadalje je mnenja, da morajo biti ti cilji osredotočeni na vzpostavitev in ohranitev sodnih in upravnih struktur, ki bodo v celoti delovale;
Stresses that this action plan must attain specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed targets, in particular, where relevant, the creation of transparent procurement rules which meet international standards and do not restrict competition from international bidders by imposing huge internal administrative burdens on them; further considers that these targets must focus on the establishment and maintenance of fully operational judicial and administrative structures;
pozdravlja posodobljene podatke Komisije o statusu izvrševanja sredstev EU v Bolgariji in Romuniji; vendar še naprej opaža obstoj nedoslednosti in nepravilnosti v predloženih poročilih o napredku; se mu zdi, da obstoječi modeli poročil o napredku onemogočajo njena prizadevanja za ocenjevanje napredka sodnega in upravnega sistema; od Komisije zahteva, naj še naprej budno spremlja sisteme teh držav članic in uresničevanje sprejetih akcijskih načrtov, ter predlaga, naj tudi urad OLAF še naprej podpira te države članice pri izvajanju njihovih obveznosti, povezanih z zaščito finančnih interesov Unije;
Welcomes the updated information from the Commission on the status of implementation of EU funds in Bulgaria and Romania; however, notes the continuous existence of inconsistencies and irregularities in the progress reports submitted; finds its efforts to evaluate progress in the judicial and administrative system frustrated by the existing designs of the progress reports; requests the Commission to continue to closely monitor those Member States‘ systems and the implementation of the agreed action plans, and suggests that OLAF also should maintain the support given by it to those Member States in fulfilling their obligations concerning the protection of the financial interests of the Union;
zahteva, da se v poročilih podajo jasne navedbe o napredku na ključnih področjih boja proti goljufiji in korupciji; opozarja na svojo zahtevo po semafornem sistemu (rdeče, jantarne in zelene barve), ki temelji na posebnih kazalnikih (količina in kakovost sodnih in upravnih ukrepov, sprejetih za preprečevanje, kaznovanje in odvračanje od goljufije in korupcije), ki bodo podali jasno sliko o razvoju obstoječih sistemov v tistih državah; je presenečen, da pri sestavi poročil niso bila vedno opravljena posvetovanja z uradom OLAF; prosi Komisijo, da vključi pripombe Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam v naslednja poročila o napredku;
Demands that the reports give clear indications as to progress in the key areas of the fight against fraud and corruption; recalls its demand for a traffic-light system (red, amber and green), based on specific indicators (quantity and quality of legal and administrative measures taken to prevent, deter and punish fraud and corruption), so as to give a clear picture of the evolution of existing systems in those countries; is astonished that OLAF was not always consulted in the compilation of the reports; asks the Commission to include OLAF's comments in the upcoming progress reports;
je seznanjen z ukrepi Komisije za izboljšanje celotnega izvajanja predpristopne pomoči na Hrvaškem v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi organi in za podrobno spremljanje razmer za popolno decentralizacijo sredstev iz instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč; poudarja, da bi izkušnje s težavami, povezanimi z izvrševanjem predpristopnih sredstev v Bolgariji in Romuniji, morale pomagati hrvaškim oblastem, da se s pomočjo Komisije izognejo podobnih težavam pri izvrševanju predpristopnih sredstev v njihovi državi; obžaluje dejstvo, da Komisija ni upoštevala zahteve Parlamenta po vzpostavitvi semafornega sistema (rdeča, jantarna in zelena barva), predstavljenega v poročilih o napredku, ki prikazujejo razvoj na področjih, zelo pomembnih za boj proti goljufiji, kot denimo vzpostavitev in ohranitev trdnih in učinkovitih struktur za sodstvo in javno upravo;
Notes the steps taken by the Commission to improve the overall performance of pre-accession assistance in Croatia in close cooperation with the national authorities and to closely monitor the conditions for the full decentralisation of IPA funds; stresses that lessons learned from problems concerning the implementation of pre-accession funds in Bulgaria and Romania should help the Croatian authorities, with the Commission's assistance, to avoid similar difficulties when implementing the pre-accession funds in respect of their country; deplores the fact that the Commission failed to act on Parliament's request for a traffic-light system (green, amber and red) to be introduced into the progress reports, showing developments in areas of high importance for the fight against fraud such as the establishment and maintenance of stable and efficient structures for the judiciary and the administration;
je razočaran nad dejstvom, da ključni slabosti (prenizka pripravljenost za programiranje in neenakomerna učinkovitost po sektorjih), ki sta pripeljali do „zmerno nezadovoljive“ splošne učinkovitosti, povezane s predpristopno pomočjo v Turčiji, še vedno prevladujeta;
Is disappointed by the fact that key weaknesses (lack of programming readiness and uneven performance across sectors), which have resulted in a ‘moderately unsatisfactory’ overall performance as regards pre-accession assistance in Turkey, continue to prevail;
je seznanjen z ukrepi Komisije v državah kandidatkah in preostalih državah na Zahodnem Balkanu za boj proti korupciji, ter spodbuja k izvajanju projektov, ki krepijo neodvisnost sodstva, oblikovanje strokovnih organov pregona in podporo za boj proti korupciji, v okviru regionalne in nacionalne pomoči; opozarja, da se je po Solunski agendi za Zahodni Balkan EU zavzela za tesno sodelovanje z zahodnimi državami Balkana, da bi še naprej utrjevali mir in spodbujali stabilnost, demokracijo in načela pravne države ter spoštovali človekove pravice in pravice manjšin; poudarja, da to zadeva tudi boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in korupciji, prav tako pa okrepitev regionalnega sodelovanja;
Notes the steps taken by the Commission in the candidate countries and other countries in the Western Balkans to fight corruption, and encourages the implementation of projects strengthening the independence of the judiciary, the development of professional law enforcement and support for the fight against corruption, within the framework of the regional and national assistance; recalls that under the Thessaloniki Agenda for the Western Balkans the EU undertook to work closely with the western Balkan countries to further consolidate peace and to promote stability, democracy, the rule of law and respect for human and minority rights; stresses that this also applies to the fight against organised crime and corruption as well as to the enhancement of regional cooperation;
opozarja, da Računsko sodišče ni odkrilo jasne metodologije Komisije, s pomočjo katere Komisija meri napredek na teh področjih; še zlasti prosi Generalni sekretariat Komisije, da Parlamentu zagotovi poročilo o izvajanju Solunske agende, ki bi lahko tvorila podlago za zunanje ocenjevanje njenega napredka; poziva Komisijo, da vzpostavi jasno povezavo med plačevanjem predpristopnih sredstev in dokazanimi ter vidnimi dosežki na področjih Solunske agende;
Recalls that the Court of Auditors found no clear Commission methodology by which the Commission measures progress in those areas; in particular, asks the Commission's Secretariat-General to provide Parliament with a report on the implementation of the Thessaloniki Agenda which could serve as the basis for an external evaluation of its progress; calls on the Commission to establish a clear connection between the payment of pre-accession funds and evidenced and visible achievements in the fields of the Thessaloniki Agenda;
opozarja, da poročilo o napredku 2009 za Hrvaško kaže pomanjkljivosti na področju sodstva zaradi pomanjkanja preglednosti in uporabe enotnih, objektivnih meril pri izbiri sodnikov in tožilcev; zato dvomi, da so bila sredstva, ki so bila porabljena za Poglavje 23, porabljena učinkovito in uspešno;
Recalls that the 2009 progress report for Croatia shows deficiencies in the fields of the judiciary due to shortcomings in the transparency and application of uniform, objective criteria in the selection of judges and prosecutors; doubts, therefore, that the funds spent on Chapter 23 were spent efficiently and effectively;
opaža, da Svet za regionalno sodelovanje deluje že več kot leto dni; prosi Komisijo, da zagotovi podatke z namenom krepitve regionalnega sodelovanja v okviru decentraliziranega sistema izvajanja in z namenom, da se proračunskemu organu predstavi njen strateški načrt na tem področju;
Notes that the Regional Cooperation Council has been active for more than a year; asks the Commission to provide information with a view to strengthening regional cooperation under the decentralised implementation system and to present to the budget authority its strategic considerations in that area;
opozarja na potrebo, da države kandidatke zagotovijo učinkovito izvajanje novih in preoblikovanih pravnih določb s pomočjo ambiciozne, pregledne, odgovorne učinkovite in uspešne javne službe; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je ne glede na različen razvoj v obeh državah korupcija na Hrvaškem in v Makedoniji še vedno zelo razširjena in da gre za precej resno težavo; obžaluje dejstvo, da je bila v primerih korupcije na visoki ravni preiskava izvedena le do določene mere in da je v povprečju le malo preiskav privedlo do kazenskih ovadb; poudarja, da to kaže na resne pomanjkljivosti v pravosodnem sistemu;
Recalls the need for the candidate countries to ensure effective implementation of new and reformed legal provisions by means of an ambitious, transparent, accountable, effective and efficient public service; notes with concern that – notwithstanding different developments in both countries – both in Croatia and in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) corruption is still widespread and constitutes a very serious problem; deplores the fact that in cases of high-level corruption only limited investigation was carried out and that, overall, only a small number of investigations led to criminal charges; stresses that this indicates serious shortcomings in the judicial system;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej spremlja in poroča proračunskemu organu o zaostankih in številu novih kazenskih ovadb in sodb, pa tudi o zaostankih in številu novih sodnih primerov na podlagi obtožb zaradi kršitev zakonodaje javnega naročanja na Hrvaškem in v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji;
Asks the Commission to continuously monitor and report to the budgetary authority on the backlog and number of new criminal charges and verdicts and the backlog and number of new court cases brought on charges of infringement of public procurement laws in Croatia and in FYROM;
ugotavlja, da še vedno obstaja potreba po stalnem, objektivnem in preglednem spremljanju napredka; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, da v pristopnem procesu oblikuje izhodišče na ključnih področjih, pomembnih za pristop, in da to izhodišče uporabi kot priporočilo in merilo v celotnem pristopnem procesu; meni, da sta trajnost napredka v pristopnem procesu ter potrjevanje ciljev, doseženih v času takšnega procesa, največjega pomena za uspešno nadaljevanje Unije; posledično prosi za redno popristopno spremljanje;
Concludes that the need for constant, objective and transparent progress monitoring remains; in that regard, calls on the Commission in the event of accession proceedings to establish a starting-point in key areas relevant for accession and to use that starting-point as a reference and benchmark throughout the accession process; considers that the sustainability of progress in the accession process and affirmation of the aims achieved during such process are of paramount importance for the successful continuation of the Union; consequently, asks for a regular post-accession follow-up;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da revizija Računskega sodišča ni pokazala nobenih resnih napak, ki bi škodile zakonitosti in pravilnosti upravnih odhodkov;
Notes with satisfaction that the Court's audits brought to light no material errors affecting the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure.
poziva Komisijo naj med desetim vmesnim pregledom Evropskega razvojnega sklada razmisli o povečanju svoje pomoči zdravstvenem sektorju in s tem okrepi svojo podporo zdravstvenim razvojnim ciljem tisočletja, ter zagotovi, da bo njena pomoč zdravstvenemu sektorju razporejena tako, da bo upoštevala politične prednostne naloge podpore zdravstvenim sistemom;
Invites the Commission to consider increasing its aid to the health sector during the 10th EDF mid-term review to support its commitment to the health MDGs, and to ensure that its assistance to the health sector is distributed respecting its policy priority of support to health systems;
opominja Komisijo, da se je v povezavi z instrumentom za razvojno sodelovanje obvezala, da bo 20 % sredstev v vseh izdatkih evropske razvojne politike do leta 2009 namenila zdravstvu in osnovnemu izobraževanju, ter od nje zahteva, da redno obvešča Parlament, kakšen odstotek celotne razvojne pomoči, namenjene Podsaharski Afriki, je bil odobren za osnovno- in srednješolsko izobraževanje in osnovno zdravstvo po posameznih državah;
Reminds the Commission of the undertaking given in the context of the Development Cooperation Instrument to devote 20 % of funds to health and basic education by 2009 in all European development policy spending, and requests it to regularly inform Parliament what percentage, broken down by country, of the total development assistance allocated to sub-Saharan Africa is committed for basic and secondary education and basic health;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi zadostno strokovno znanje s področja zdravja, da bo lahko imela učinkovito vlogo v dialogu v zdravstvenem sektorju, in sicer tako, da poskrbi, da bodo imele vse delegacije, pri katerih je zdravje najpomembnejše področje, strokovnjake za zdravstvo, da v državah, kjer so se končali spopadi, tesneje sodeluje z zdravstvenimi svetovalci direktorata Komisije za humanitarno pomoč, da sklepa tesnejša partnerstva z uradi Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije v državah in tako uporabi njihovo strokovno znanje ter da sklene uradne sporazume z državami članicami EU o uporabi njihovega strokovnega znanja; zahteva od Komisije, naj Parlamentu sporoči število strokovnjakov za zdravje in izobraževanje, ki so na voljo v regiji, tako v delegacijah kot tudi na sedežih, ter pregled, iz katerega je razvidno, ali ji je uspelo povečati število teh strokovnjakov;
Urges the Commission to ensure that it has sufficient health expertise to play an effective role in the health sector dialogue by ensuring that all delegations where health is a focal sector have health specialists, by working more closely in post-conflict countries with ECHO health advisers, by forming closer partnerships with World Health Organization country offices with a view to drawing on their expertise and by entering into formal agreements with EU Member States to use their expertise; requests the Commission to communicate to Parliament the number of health and education experts respectively available in the region, at delegation level as well as in its headquarters, and an overview indicating whether it has succeeded in increasing this number;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej povečuje porabo sektorske proračunske podpore v zdravstvenem sektorju, naj svojo splošno proračunsko podporo usmerja na izboljšavo zdravstvenih storitev in naj še naprej uporablja projekte za podporo oblikovanja politike in razvoja zmogljivosti;
Invites the Commission to continue to increase use of Sector Budget Support in the health sector, to focus its General Budget Support (GBS) on improving health services and to continue to use projects for support to policy development and capacity-building;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje mehanizme in pripomočke za spremljanje, s katerimi bo zagotovila, da ustrezni delež pomoči iz splošne proračunske podpore podpira osnovne potrebe, zlasti v zdravstvenem sektorju, naj uporabi cilje, ki neposredno merijo rezultate politik, naj pomaga pri razvoju zmogljivosti in obvešča Parlament o ukrepih, ki jih je izvedla v ta namen;
Urges the Commission to put in place mechanisms and monitoring tools to ensure that an adequate proportion of GBS aid is supporting basic needs, particularly in the health sector, to use targets that directly measure the outcome of policies, to provide support for capacity-building and to inform Parliament about the steps it has taken to that end;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje jasnejše smernice za uporabo vsakega instrumenta in njihovih kombinacij in naj tesneje in učinkovitejše sodeluje z Globalnim skladom v državah upravičenkah;
Invites the Commission to establish clearer guidance on the use of each instrument and their combinations, as well as to work more closely and efficiently with the Global Fund in beneficiary countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z Računskim sodiščem ugotovi, kako odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, navedene v poročilu Računskega sodišča, in naj Parlament obvesti o rezultatu teh razprav;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Court of Auditors, to identify how the weaknesses noted in the Court's report can be addressed, and to report to Parliament on the outcome of these discussions;
Posebno poročilo št. 12/2008 o instrumentu strukturnih politik v predpristopnem obdobju (ISPA), 2000–2006
Special report No 12/2008 on the Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-accession (ISPA), 2000-2006
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno spremlja izvajanje nekdanjih projektov ISPA, preuči, kako bi lahko v prihodnosti preprečili ali zmanjšali zamude v izvajanju projektov pri podobnih instrumentih (na primer IPA), in sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje zamud pri pripravi prihodnjih pisnih navodil;
Urges the Commission to closely follow up the implementation of ex-ISPA projects, to examine how delays in the implementation of projects could be avoided or reduced in the future when implementing similar instruments (for instance, the IPA), and to take all necessary steps in order to prevent delays in the preparation of future guidance documents;
zahteva strožje in stvarnejše načrtovanje prosilcev za projekte ter načine za pospešitev postopkov pri izvajanju podobnih instrumentov v prihodnosti, tako na ravni Komisije kot v nacionalnih upravah držav upravičenk;
Calls for more rigorous and realistic planning by projects‘ applicants and for ways to speed up the procedures, when implementing similar instruments in the future, both at the Commission level and within national administrations of beneficiary countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej revidira sisteme, s čimer bo zagotovila pripravo zanesljivih sistemov za upravljanje strukturnega in kohezijskega sklada, ter naj prepreči morebitne zelo tvegane razmere v prihodnosti;
Invites the Commission to continue its systems audits in order to ensure that reliable systems are created for the management of the Structural and Cohesion Funds, and to prevent potential high-risk situations in the future;
opozarja Komisijo, da je treba izboljšati učinkovitost usklajevanja pomoči med Unijo, Evropsko investicijsko banko in drugimi mednarodnimi in lokalnimi partnerji ter redno izmenjavo informacij, zlasti na lokalni ravni, da bi povečali doslednost in skladnost dejavnosti;
Draws the Commission's attention to the need to improve effective coordination of assistance by the Union, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and other international and local partners, and regular exchange of information, in particular at the local level, in order to increase the consistency and complementarity of activities;
ugotavlja, da se je raven spremljanja kasneje izboljšala, a v prvih letih programa MEDA ni bila primerna, zlasti v primerih, ko se je Komisija v celoti zanašala na spremljanje, ki ga je opravila Evropska investicijska banka pred letom 2005;
Notes that, although the level of monitoring subsequently improved, it was not adequate during the first years of the MEDA programme, in particular in cases where the Commission relied entirely on the monitoring performed by the EIB before 2005;
poudarja pomen sporazuma o upravljanju bančnih ukrepov, za katere je po pooblastilu Komisije pristojna Evropska investicijska banka, da bi zagotovili ustrezno spremljanje, upoštevali okoljske vidike, zavarovali finančne interese Unije in zagotovili, da posredniki in nosilci izpolnijo svoje finančne obveznosti in obveznosti poročanja;
Underlines the importance of a management agreement concerning the referred banking measures mandated to the EIB on behalf of the Commission in order to ensure appropriate monitoring, to cover the environmental aspects, to safeguard the financial interests of the Union and to ensure that the intermediaries and promoters fulfil their financial and reporting obligations;
poudarja pomen posebej zasnovanih programov vrednotenja in spremljanja za bančne ukrepe za uporabo v okviru instrumenta evropske sosedske politike;
Stresses the importance of a tailor-made evaluation and monitoring programme for banking measures to be applied within the framework of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument;
Posebno poročilo št. 2/2009 o programu javnega zdravja Evropske unije (2003–2007): Uspešen način za izboljšanje zdravja?
Special report No 2/2009 on the European Union's Public health Programme (2003-2007): an effective way to improve health?
meni, da je bil program javnega zdravja (2003–2007) ambiciozno zasnovan, a cilji niso bili dovolj jasni in tudi ne prilagojeni omejenim proračunskim sredstvom; poudarja, da je imel program zaradi tega preveč področij ukrepanja, ki v nekaterih primerih niti niso bila zajeta v projektih; ugotavlja, da se je zaradi tega znižala kakovost programa, obenem pa se je obseg projektov tako razširil, da Komisija nima popolnega pregleda nad vsemi obstoječimi programi; zato poziva Komisijo, naj poroča Parlamentu o izidu zbiranja podatkov o sedanjem programu javnega zdravja in poudarja, da je treba tveganje slabitve programov obravnavati v vmesni in naknadni oceni programa;
Considers that the Public Health Programme (PHP) (2003-2007) was ambitiously set, but that its objectives were neither clear enough nor adjusted to the limited budgetary means; points out that this led to the programme having too many action areas, which in some cases were not even covered by projects; notes that this dilution has decreased the quality of the programme, at the same time as making the range of projects so wide that the Commission is not fully aware of all existing projects; therefore invites the Commission to report to Parliament on the outcome of its mapping exercises for the current PHP and stresses that the risk of dilution should be addressed in the mid-term and ex-post evaluations of the programme;
ugotavlja, da je Sodišče podvomilo v koristnost delov programa javnega zdravja in obžaluje, da je program v nekaterih primerih financiral projekte (zlasti pod naslovom „determinante zdravja“), kjer je evropska dodana vrednost omejena;
Notes that the Court has questioned the utility of parts of the PHP and regrets that the programme has, in some cases, financed projects (in particular under its ‘health determinants’ strand) in which European added value is limited;
zato meni, da se mora vsako nadaljevanje programa javnega zdravja osredotočiti na omrežja in izmenjavo najboljših praks ter da se je treba v večji meri posluževati odprte metode usklajevanja za spodbujanje izmenjave dobre prakse;
Considers, therefore, that any successor PHP should focus on networks and exchange of best practice and that more use should be made of the open method of coordination with a view to encouraging the exchange of ‘good practices’;