natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da urbanistični organi težko usklajujejo področja financiranja iz Evropskega socialnega sklada, kjer gre za ekonomski in socialni razvoj, in financiranja iz evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj, kjer gre za načrtovanje naložb v fizično infrastrukturo; meni, da je treba spremeniti načelo "en program, en sklad" ter da bi morali lokalni in regionalni organi bolje izkoristiti sinergije pomoči iz Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj in Evropskega socialnega sklada ter okrepiti celovito financiranje; poziva Komisijo, naj na dolgi rok preuči možnost združitve obeh skladov, če bi to zagotovilo poenostavitev postopkov;
Recognises the difficulty for urban authorities in reconciling the domains of the European Social Fund (ESF) funding whilst pursuing economic and social development and ERDF funding whilst planning physical infrastructure investments; believes that the "one programme, one fund" principle should be reviewed and that local and regional authorities should make better use of the synergies of ERDF and ESF funding and reinforce integrated funding; in the long term, invites the Commission to study the possibility of merging the two funds, if this could ensure the simplification of procedures;
podpira zamisel o obnovljivem mehanizmu instrumenta JESSICA in njegov potencial za gospodarsko rast na urbanih območjih ter meni tudi, da bi morala v naslednjem programskem obdobju regionalna politika bolj izkoristiti uporabo mehanizmov finančnega inženiringa, kot so obnovljivi skladi, in ponujati ugodna posojila, namesto da se zanaša izključno na nepovratna sredstva kot sedaj;
Supports the idea of the principle of revolving JESSICA funds and its potential for economic growth in urban areas and also believes that in the next programming period, regional policy needs to take advantage of using, to a greater extent, financial engineering mechanisms such as revolving funds, offering favourable loans, rather than relying solely on grants, as is the case at present;
je seznanjen s potencialom zasebnega sektorja za razvoj mest ter meni, da bi z uporabo javno-zasebnih partnerstev morali sistematično načrtovati in spodbujati vzpostavitev inovativnih sistemov in projektov financiranja za spoprijem z velikimi gospodarskimi in socialnimi problemi urbanih območij, zlasti za izgradnjo infrastrukture in stanovanja; poudarja zlasti, da so za to potrebna jasna in pregledna pravila ravnanja, zlasti kar zadeva delovanje podjetij in javnih ustanov, ki morajo v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti sprejemati strateške odločitve o izbiri vrst storitev, pripravi specifikacij in ohranjanju določene stopnje nadzora;
Notes the urban development potential of the private sector and believes that the use of Public Private Partnerships should be systematically envisaged and encouraged for the establishment of innovative financing schemes and projects in order to tackle the major economic and social problems of urban areas, notably for the construction of infrastructure and for housing; emphasises that this requires a clear, transparent code of conduct, particularly regarding the activities of public authorities, which have to take, according to the subsidiarity principle, the strategic decisions on the choice of service provision methods, drawing up specifications, and also on maintaining a certain degree of control;
poudarja izvedbeni in upravni vidik urbane razsežnosti ter poziva k nadaljnjim prizadevanjem za poenostavitev izvedbenih pravil kohezijske politike in splošnemu zmanjšanju prekomerne birokracije v zvezi z upravljanjem in nadzorom skladov ter posameznih projektov;
Highlights the implementation and administrative aspects of the urban dimension and calls for further efforts in order to simplify the implementation rules of cohesion policy and the overall reduction of excessive bureaucracy as regards the management and control of the funds and individual projects;
ugotavlja, da poleg kohezijske politike urbana območja finančno podpirajo tudi druge politike Skupnosti, zato poziva Komisijo, naj razvije in predlaga boljše usklajevanje zadevnih politik za združitev vseh sredstev Evropske unije, namenjenih urbanim območjem, da bi zagotovila izvajanje celovitega pristopa v praksi, hkrati pa naj vedno upošteva kohezijsko politiko;
Notes that apart from cohesion policy, there are other Community policies that also provide financial support to urban areas and thus calls on the Commission to develop and propose greater coordination of the policies involved that would bring together all EU resources allocated to urban areas to secure in practice the implementation of the integrated approach, whilst always taking cohesion policy into account;
meni, da vodstvene strukture v državah članicah niso najbolje prilagojene za spodbujanje horizontalnega sodelovanja, in odločno poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja vzpostavitev strukture medsektorskega upravljanja;
Believes that the governance structures in place in the Member States are still ill adapted to encouraging horizontal cooperation and strongly urges the Commission to promote the principle of a cross-sectoral management structure;
poziva, da se razpoložljivi finančni, človeški in organizacijski viri uporabljajo učinkoviteje, da bi ustvarili in okrepili mreže mest in velemest na področju trajnostnega razvoja mest, saj imajo pomembno vlogo v teritorialnem sodelovanju; pri tem poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti infrastrukturo, s katero se bodo ohranile posebne značilnosti (npr. zgodovinske) in ki bo omogočila posodabljanje (npr. inovacijska središča), gospodarsko rast (npr. mala in srednje velika podjetja) in sezonske dejavnosti, ter poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi položaj urbanih območij v pobudi "Regije za gospodarske spremembe";
Calls for existing financial, human and organisational resources to be used more efficiently in order to create and strengthen the networks established by towns and cities in the field of sustainable urban development, as they play an important part in territorial cooperation; in that context, stresses the need for infrastructure which helps maintain particular characteristics (e.g. historical), modernisation (e.g. innovation poles), economic growth (e.g. SMEs) and seasonal activities and calls on the Commission to strengthen the position of urban areas in the Regions for Economic Change Initiative;
ugotavlja, da so za ustrezno izvajanje politike regionalnega razvoja in trajnostni teritorialni razvoj potrebno ravnotežje politik na urbanih, primestnih in podeželskih območjih, ki jih je treba uskladiti z ukrepi na podeželju, ter ponovno poudarja, da ima politika za razvoj podeželja pomemben vpliv na prostor in da politiki za razvoj mest in podeželja nista dovolj povezani; poudarja potrebo po pravi sinergiji med tema politikama, ki bi omogočila dejanski razvojni potencial ter prispevala k območjem privlačnosti in konkurenčnosti; poziva države članice in regije, naj uporabljajo instrument partnerstva med mesti in podeželjem, da bi dosegle cilj uravnoteženega prostorskega razvoja;
Notes that appropriate implementation of regional development policy and a sustainable territorial development strategy require a balance between policies that concern urban, suburban and rural areas and consequently affect the development of real regional cohesion, and reiterates the fact that rural development policy has a significant spatial impact and that there is insufficient integration of urban and rural development policies; underlines the need for real synergy between these policies culminating in real development potential and the promotion of attractiveness and competitiveness areas; calls on the Member States and regions to use the urban-rural partnership instrument in order to achieve the goal of balanced spatial development;
poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej razvija in redno posodablja projekt Urban Audit ter obenem zagotavlja informacije o stanju ločnice med mestom in podeželjem v vseh državah članicah, da bi dobili jasno predstavo o položaju ter prepoznali posebne potrebe za uravnotežen razvoj mest in podeželja;
Calls on the Commission to further develop and regularly update the Urban Audit and at the same time provide information on the situation on the 'urban - rural divide' for all Member States in order to have a clear picture of the situation and to identify the specific needs for balanced urban and rural development;
priporoča Komisiji in državam članicam, naj ustanovijo evropsko skupino na visoki ravni za razvoj mest in uporabljajo odprto metodo usklajevanja za politiko razvoja mest na ravni Evropske unije;
Recommends that the Commission and Member States establish an EU High Level Group on Urban Development and apply the open method of coordination to urban development policy at EU level;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009 o izvajanju Uredbe o strukturnih skladih 2007–2013: rezultati pogajanj glede nacionalnih strategij in operativnih programov kohezijske politike ( 2008/2183(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on the implementation of the Structural Funds Regulation 2007-2013: the results of the negotiations on the national cohesion strategies and the operational programmes ( 2008/2183(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES, zlasti členov 2 in 3(2) Pogodbe,
having regard to the EC Treaty and in particular Articles 2 and 3(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 14. maja 2008 o rezultatih pogajanj glede strategij in programov kohezijske politike za programsko obdobje 2007–2013 ( KOM(2008)0301 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 14 May 2008 on the results of the negotiations concerning cohesion policy strategies and programmes for the programming period 2007-2013 ( COM(2008)0301 ),
(splošna uredba o ESRR, ESS in Kohezijskem skladu),
(General Regulation on the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund),
(strateške smernice o koheziji),
(Strategic guidelines on cohesion),
ob upoštevanju izidov pogajanj o strategijah in programih kohezijske politike za obdobje 2007–2013 - podatkovni listi držav članic,
having regard to the Results of the negotiation of Cohesion Policy strategies and programmes 2007-2013 – Fact sheets by Member State,
ob upoštevanju četrtega poročila o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ( KOM(2007)0273 ) (četrto kohezijsko poročilo),
having regard to the Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion ( COM(2007)0273 ) (The Fourth Cohesion Report),
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu v zvezi z nekaterimi določbami glede finančnega upravljanja ( KOM(2008)0803 ),
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund concerning certain provisions relating to financial management ( COM(2008)0803 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1080/2006 o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj v zvezi z upravičenostjo do naložb v energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive vire energije pri stanovanjskih objektih ( KOM(2008)0838 ),
having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund as regards the eligibility of energy efficiency and renewable energy investments in housing ( COM(2008)0838 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1081/2006 o Evropskem socialnem skladu, da se dodajo vrste stroškov, upravičenih do prispevka iz ESS ( KOM(2008)0813 ),
having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1081/2006 on the European Social Fund to extend the types of costs eligible for a contribution from the ESF ( COM(2008)0813 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A6-0108/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6-0108/2009 ),
ker je Komisija objavila zgoraj omenjeno sporočilo na podlagi izidov pogajanj z državami članicami o nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirih in operativnih programih,
whereas the Commission has published the abovementioned Communication on the basis of the results of negotiations with Member States on the National Strategic Reference Frameworks and Operational Programmes,
ker si Skupnost v skladu s členom 158 Pogodbe prizadeva zmanjšati razlike v stopnji razvitosti različnih regij in zaostalost najmanj razvitih regij oziroma otokov, vključno s podeželjskimi območji, da bi okrepila svojo gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo,
whereas, according to Article 158 of the Treaty, in order to strengthen its economic and social cohesion, the Community aims to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions or islands, including rural areas,
ker sta zadnji dve širitvi Evropske unije povzročili znatno povečanje regionalnih razlik v Skupnosti, ki jih je treba ustrezno obravnavati, da bi spodbudili skladen, uravnotežen in trajnosten razvoj,
whereas the last two enlargements of the European Union generated a substantial widening of regional disparities in the Community that need to be addressed appropriately in order to promote harmonious, balanced and sustainable development,
ker zadnja poročila o koheziji izpostavljajo trend naraščanja teritorialnih razlik med regijami EU in na podregionalni ravni, za katero so značilni pojavi, kot je prostorska segregacija, ki so povzročili nastanek nekaterih oblik getoizacije, ter nadaljnje nazadovanje nekaterih oddaljenih, pretežno kmetijskih območij,
whereas the recent reports on cohesion highlight a trend towards a worsening of territorial disparities between EU regions and, at sub-regional level, disparities characterised by phenomena such as spatial segregation, which have resulted in the emergence of a certain kind of ghettoisation, and the continued decline of some remote and predominantly agricultural areas,
ker je Svet oktobra 2006 sprejel zgoraj navedene strateške smernice o koheziji kot okvirno ogrodje držav članic za pripravo nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirov in operativnih programov za obdobje 2007–2013,
whereas in October 2006 the Council adopted the abovementioned Strategic guidelines on cohesion, as an indicative framework for the Members States for the preparation of the National Strategic Reference Frameworks and Operational Programmes for the period 2007-2013,
ker se tri prednostne naloge, določene v strateških smernicah o koheziji, nanašajo na povečanje privlačnosti Evrope in njenih regij za naložbe in zaposlitve, povečanje znanja in inovacij za rast ter ustvarjanje več in boljših delovnih mest,
whereas the three priorities laid down in the Strategic guidelines on cohesion refer to making Europe and its regions more attractive places in which to invest and work, improving knowledge and innovation for growth and creating more and better jobs,
ker bi moralo spreminjanje teh prednostih nalog v operativne programe regijam omogočiti, da bi se spoprijele z izzivi globalizacije ter strukturnimi, demografskimi in podnebnimi spremembami ter okrepile trajnostni razvoj,
whereas translating these priorities into operational programmes should enable regions to face the challenges of globalisation, structural, demographic and climate change and to strengthen sustainable development,
ker so med državami članicami pomembne razlike pri izvajanju teh prednostnih nalog v njihovih operativnih programih glede na to, kaj je regionalni razvojni cilj v posamezni regiji – konvergenca ali regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje,
whereas there are significant differences in the ways Member States have implemented the abovementioned priorities in their operational programmes, depending on which regional development objective, convergence or regional competitiveness and employment any specific region comes under,
ker so države članice, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile pred 1. majem 2004, glede na splošno uredbo o ESRR, ESS in kohezijskem skladu morale 60 % vseh izdatkov za konvergenčni cilj ter 75 % za cilja regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja nameniti za prednostne naloge, povezane z lizbonsko strategijo, in ker je bilo državam članicam, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile 1. maja 2004 ali kasneje, svetovano, naj sprejmejo enak pristop,
whereas Member States which joined the Union before 1 May 2004 were required by the General Regulation on the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund to earmark 60% of the total expenditure for the 'convergence' objective and 75% for the regional competitiveness and employment objective to priorities related to the Lisbon Strategy, and whereas Member States which joined the Union on or after 1 May 2004 were advised to adopt the same approach,
ker so trajnost, preprečevanje vsakršne diskriminacije, dobro upravljanje in uporaba načela partnerstva ob močni institucionalni ter upravni zmogljivosti bistveni za uspešno izvajanje kohezijske politike,
whereas sustainability, prevention of any kind of discrimination, good governance and application of the partnership principle, together with a strong institutional and administrative capacity, are essential to the successful implementation of cohesion policy,
ker mora biti kohezijska politika dovolj močna in prilagodljiva, da lahko prevzame pomembno vlogo pri prizadevanjih Unije za preprečitev posledic sedanje svetovne gospodarske krize,
whereas cohesion policy must be strong and flexible enough to be able to play an important role in the Union's efforts to counteract the effects of the present global economic crisis,
priznava prizadevanja vseh držav članic, da bi v svoje operativne programe vključile tri prednostne naloge, določene v strateških smernicah o koheziji, ki ustrezajo ciljem lizbonske agende;
Acknowledges the efforts made by all Member States to incorporate the three priorities laid down in the Strategic guidelines on cohesion, which correspond to the objectives of the Lisbon agenda, into their operational programmes;
ugotavlja, da številne države članice razmeroma počasi začenjajo novo programsko obdobje, kar bi lahko ogrozilo učinkovito porabo sredstev; prepričan pa je, da bodo obveznosti, prevzete med procesom pogajanj in sprejemanja operativnih programov, spoštovane v korist regij in Unije kot celote;
Notes the fairly slow start made to the new programming period in many Member States, which might jeopardise the effective use of the funding; expresses, however, confidence that commitments made during the negotiation and approval process of operational programmes will be respected for the benefit of the regions and of the Union as a whole;
opaža odločenost držav članic, da obravnavajo posebne ozemeljske potrebe, ki izhajajo iz zemljepisne lege ter razvitosti gospodarstva in institucij, z oblikovanjem strategij za zmanjšanje neravnovesij znotraj regij in med njimi; v zvezi s tem opozarja na ukrepe, ki so jih države članice predlagale za spoprijemanje s posebnimi razvojnimi izzivi, s katerimi se srečujejo regije s posebnimi geografskimi značilnostmi, na primer gorske regije, otoki, najbolj oddaljene regije, odročna obmejna mesta, regije, v katerih prebivalstvo upada, in obmejne regije; ponavlja, da sta ekonomsko in okoljsko uravnovešen razvoj ter zmanjšanje regionalnih razlik še vedno glavna cilja regionalne politike EU;
Takes note of the determination of Member States to address the specific territorial needs arising from their geographical location and economic and institutional development, by drawing up strategies to diminish intra-regional and inter-regional imbalances; recalls, in this context, the measures proposed by Member States to face particular development challenges of regions with specific geographical features, such as mountain regions, islands, the outermost regions, remote border towns, regions suffering from depopulation and border regions; reiterates the fact that economic and environmentally sound development, as well as the reduction of regional disparities remain the principal goals of EU regional policy;
obžaluje, da načela trajnosti, enakih možnosti in nediskriminacije ter partnerstva v številnih nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirih in operativnih programih niso bila dovolj uporabljena in dokumentirana; je kritičen do dejstva, da je Komisija kljub temu odobrila operativne programe s takimi pomanjkljivostmi in ni vztrajala, da jih države članice ali regije izboljšajo;
Regrets that the principles of sustainability, equality of opportunity and non-discrimination, as well as partnership, have been insufficiently applied and documented in many National Strategic Reference Frameworks and Operational Programmes; is critical of the fact that the Commission has none the less approved Operational Programmes with such deficits and has not insisted on improvements by Member States or regions;
poudarja, da pretekle izkušnje kažejo, da lahko konvergenca med državami prikrije večanje razlik med regijami in znotraj njih; ugotavlja tudi, da so te regionalne in lokalne razlike opazne na številnih področjih – pri zaposlovanju, produktivnosti, prihodkih, stopnji izobraženosti in inovativni sposobnosti; poudarja pomen teritorialne razsežnosti kohezije pri premagovanju teh težav;
Stresses that past experience has shown that convergence between countries may mask a widening gap between and within regions; notes furthermore that these regional and local disparities can be observed in a number of areas, such as employment, productivity, income, education levels and innovation capacity; stresses the importance of the territorial dimension of cohesion in overcoming these problems;
Kohezijska politika pri uresničevanju lizbonske agende
Cohesion policy delivering the Lisbon agenda
pozdravlja izkazana prizadevanja nacionalnih organov pri zagotavljanju, da bi povprečna dodelitev izdatkov za doseganje ciljev lizbonske agende dosegla 65 % razpoložljivih sredstev v konvergenčnih regijah in 82 % v regijah regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, kar je dejansko več, kot je bilo sprva zahtevano;
Appreciates the efforts made by the national authorities to ensure that the average allocation of expenditure for the achievement of the Lisbon agenda constitutes 65% of the available funds in the convergence regions and 82% in the regional competitiveness and employment regions, which is in fact more than was initially requested;