natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da nadaljujeta odločna prizadevanja za splošno ratifikacijo Rimskega statuta in sprejetje potrebnih nacionalnih predpisov v skladu s Skupnim stališčem Sveta 2003/444/SZVP z dne 16. junija 2003 o Mednarodnem kazenskem sodišču UL L 150, 18.6.2003, str.
Calls on the Council and the Commission to continue their vigorous efforts to promote the universal ratification of the Rome Statute and the adoption of the necessary national implementing legislation, in conformity with Council Common Position 2003/444/CFSP of 16 June 2003 on the International Criminal Court OJ L 150, 18.6.2003, p.
in z njim povezanem akcijskem načrtu z dne 4. februarja 2004; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Čad nedavno ratificiral Rimski statut, s čimer je skupno število držav pogodbenic dne 1. januarja 2007 naraslo na 104; poziva Češko republiko kot edino državo članico EU, ki še ni ratificirala Rimskega statuta, naj to nemudoma stori; v enakem duhu poziva Svet in Komisijo, da spodbujata tretje države pri vzpostavljanju prehodnih sodnih mehanizmov na svojem ozemlju, kar predstavlja korak k zadostitvi pravice za žrtve hudih kršitev človekovih pravic;
and the related Action Plan of 4 February 2004; welcomes the fact that Chad recently ratified the Rome Statute, thereby bringing the total number of states parties to 104 as at 1 January 2007; urges the Czech Republic, as the only remaining EU Member State not to have ratified the Rome Statute, to do so without delay; in the same spirit, calls on the Council and the Commission to encourage third countries to promote transitional justice mechanisms on their territory as a step towards securing justice for the victims of grave violations of human rights;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je sklicevanje na Mednarodno kazensko sodišče navedeno v kar nekaj novih evropskih akcijskih načrtih s področja sosedske politike (za Egipt, Jordanijo, Moldavijo, Armenijo, Azerbajdžan, Gruzijo, Libanon in Ukrajino) in v nekaterih drugih novih akcijskih načrtih in sporazumih o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, o katerih še potekajo pogajanja; v celoti podpira finančna sredstva, s katerimi Komisija preko Evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) med drugim podpira delo zveze mednarodnih kazenskih sodišč, Odbora "Ni miru brez pravice", Mednarodne federacije za človekove pravice in zveze parlamentarcev za globalno ukrepanje s ciljem hitrejše ratifikacije in izvajanja rimskega statuta;
Welcomes the fact that references to the ICC have been included in several new European Neighbourhood Action Plans (relating to Egypt, Jordan, Moldova, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Lebanon and Ukraine) and are being negotiated in the context of other new Action Plans as well as Partnership and Cooperation Agreements with several countries; fully supports the Commission's financing, via the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), of the work of, inter alia, the Coalition for the International Criminal Court, of No Peace Without Justice, of the International Federation for Human Rights and of Parliamentarians for Global Action to promote the ratification and implementation of the Rome Statute;
se zaveda pomena ratifikacije Rimskega statuta s strani Združenih držav s svetovnega stališča; ponovno poziva Svet in Komisijo, da uporabita vse razpoložljive mehanizme, s katerimi bosta ZDA spodbudila k podpisu in ratifikaciji Rimskega statuta, da ostro nasprotujeta prizadevanjem ZDA, ki drugim državam aktivno preprečujejo ratifikacijo statuta, ter da tretjim državam predlagata vzporedne sporazume, kot so dvostranski sporazumi o oprostitvi;
Recognises the importance that ratification of the Rome Statute by the United States would have from a global perspective; calls once again on the Council and the Commission to use all available mechanisms to encourage the US to sign and ratify the Rome Statute and also to express strong disapproval of US efforts to actively prevent other countries from ratifying the Statute and from proposing to third countries parallel agreements such as bilateral exemption treaties;
poziva države članice, naj sodelujejo v mehanizmih mednarodnega kazenskega sodstva, zlasti pri prijetju in kazenskem pregonu ubežnikov;
Urges all Member States to collaborate fully in international criminal justice mechanisms, and especially in bringing fugitives to justice;
poziva države članice, naj aktivno sodelujejo pri ad hoc mehanizmih mednarodnega sodstva, zlasti tistih, ki so financirana s prostovoljnimi prispevki;
Urges all Member States to contribute actively to ad hoc international judicial mechanisms, particularly those receiving voluntary funding;
poudarja, da se zgoraj navedeni prehodni sodni mehanizmi ne smejo nikoli oddaljiti od spoštovanja človekovih pravic in vladavine prava, saj so to edina sredstva, s katerimi se lahko zadosti pravici žrtev in prepreči nadaljnja nekaznivost hudih kršitev človekovih pravic;
Stresses that the above-mentioned transitional judicial mechanisms must never deviate from respect for human rights and the rule of law, this being the only means of ensuring justice for victims and preventing continued impunity for the most serious human rights violations;
ceni prizadevanja za izvedbo metod in političnih prednostnih nalog iz petih smernic EU o človekovih pravicah; izraža tudi zadovoljstvo nad ocenami učinka, ki so bile opravljene za vsako od smernic in ki merijo njihov vpliv na spremembe v tretjih državah; izraža zaskrbljenost nad rednimi poročili o tem, da veleposlaništva držav članic EU v tretjih državah in misije EU smernic skorajda ne poznajo;
Appreciates the ongoing efforts to implement the methods and policy priorities outlined in the five EU guidelines on human rights as well as the production of impact assessments for each of those guidelines, weighing up their effectiveness in forging change in third countries; is concerned at regular reports that the embassies of EU Member States in third countries and EU missions have little or no knowledge of the guidelines;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo vsi njeni uslužbenci, zlasti tisti, ki se ukvarjajo z razvojno politiko, v zadostni meri seznanjeni s smernicami o človekovih pravicah; se zaveda, da si je treba prizadevati za večjo preglednost nad načini izvajanja smernic, kar vključuje tudi povratne informacije o posameznih primerih in podatke o delovanju nevladnih organizacij; se zavzema za redne in pregledne ocene izvajanja smernic EU, pri katerih bo sodeloval tudi Evropski parlament, kar mu bo zagotovilo aktivno vlogo pri ugotavljanju odgovornosti;
Asks the Commission to ensure that all its staff, in particular those working in the field of development policy, are sufficiently aware of the human rights guidelines; recognises the need for greater transparency regarding the way in which the different guidelines are operated, including feedback on individual cases and information on action taken by NGOs; calls for regular and transparent evaluations of the implementation of the EU guidelines involving Parliament, so as to allow it to play an active role in accountability;
čestita nemškemu predsedstvu za njegovo zavezanost vzpostavitvi smernic EU o pravicah otrok; poziva ga, da se o podrobnostih v zvezi s temi smernicami posvetuje s Parlamentom, Komisijo in civilno družbo ter se glede njihove polne uvedbe po potrebi uskladi s prihodnjim portugalskim predsedstvom; cilj teh smernic bi moral biti dejanska odprava dela otrok, predvsem bi se bilo treba osredotočiti na učenje in izobraževanje otrok, saj je to eden izmed razvojih ciljev tisočletja;
Commends the German Presidency's commitment to establish EU human rights guidelines on the rights of the child; encourages it to consult Parliament, the Commission and civil society on the detail of such guidelines and, if necessary, to coordinate with the future Portuguese Presidency in order to complete the introduction of those guidelines, which should aim at the effective elimination of child labour, focusing principally on teaching and educating children, this being one of the Millennium Development Goals;
ugotavlja, da se smernice EU na različne države nanašajo različno in da njihova izvedba v različnih okoliščinah zahteva posamične načrte;
Notes that the EU guidelines relate to different countries in different ways and that individual plans to implement the guidelines are required in different circumstances;
se zaveda odgovornosti, ki jo pri promociji smernic EU nosijo posebni predstavniki in misije EU v tujini; se zavzema za bolj proaktiven pristop k promociji smernic na vseh ravneh; izpostavlja finančne in kadrovske težave, s katerimi se pri poznavanju, spremljanju in izvajanju smernic srečujejo misije EU v tretjih državah; poziva predstavništva držav članic v tretjih državah in delegacije Komisije, naj se bolj učinkovito usklajujejo, in sicer tako, da si delijo opremo in osebje, kar bo ustvarilo prava "veleposlaništva Evropske unije" po svetu, ter naj prejmejo odgovornost na področju človekovih pravic;
Notes the responsibility of EU Special Representatives and EU missions abroad in promoting the EU guidelines; encourages a more proactive approach to promoting the guidelines at all levels; underlines the resource and personnel problem within EU missions in third countries concerning guideline awareness, monitoring and implementation; calls on the Member State representations in third countries and the Commission delegations to coordinate more effectively, sharing structures and staff so as to create genuine "European Union embassies" throughout the world and thereby assume responsibilities in the field of human rights;
poziva predsedstva, naj se tudi v prihodnje zavzemajo za odpravo smrtne kazni in naj se prednostno posvetijo tistim državam, kjer se kaže možnost pozitivne politične spremembe;
Urges Presidencies to continue the approach of promoting the abolition of the death penalty by prioritising a specific number of countries where there are prospects for a positive change in policy;
spodbuja predsedstva, da javno predstavijo, na katere države se v zvezi s smernicami EU o smrtni kazni nameravajo osredotočiti v okviru posebne akcije'countries on the cusp", namenjene državam, ki spreminjajo odnos do smrtne kazni; spodbuja Svet in Komisijo, naj si prizadevata za večjo podporo za dejanja generalne skupščine ZN, ki bodo usmerjena k dosegi splošnega moratorija na smrtno kazen, kar bo vodilo k njeni popolni odpravi, vključno z njenim izrekom; poziva Svet, da posodobi smernice, ki so bile pripravljene leta 1998, kar bo omogočalo upoštevanje novih elementov in strategij, oblikovanih v vmesnem času;
Encourages Presidencies to disclose which countries they intend to target in the context of the EU guidelines on the death penalty under the so-called "countries on the cusp" campaign aimed at states whose policy on the death penalty is in flux; encourages the Council and the Commission to seek greater support for moves by the current UN General Assembly to achieve a universal moratorium on capital punishment leading to its total abolition, including sentencing; urges the Council to update the guidelines, which date back to 1998, so that new elements and strategies which have developed since then can be taken into consideration;
predlaga, da Svet opravi revizijo teh smernic, da bi bilo z njo omogočeno posredovanje EU v posameznih primerih, ki vzbujajo posebno skrb, a niso uvrščeni med minimalne standarde ZN, kot to določajo smernice;
Suggests that the Council undertake a review of the guidelines and that this review could provide for the EU to intervene with regard to individual cases of particular concern which do not fall under UN minimum standards as provided for in the guidelines;
poziva predsedstvo, da države, ki še niso podpisale in ratificirale Drugega izbirnega protokola k mednarodnemu paktu o državljanskih in političnih pravicah (ICCPR), spodbudi k podpisu ter da tako ravna tudi v primeru držav članic, ki še niso podpisale Protokola št. 13 h EKČP glede odprave smrtne kazni v vseh okoliščinah Do 7. februarja 2007 Protokola št. 13 niso ratificirale Francija, Italija, Latvija, Poljska in Španija.
Calls on the Presidency to encourage those remaining countries which have not signed up to and ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) to do so, as well as those Member States that have not signed Protocol No. 13 to the ECHR concerning the abolition of the death penalty in all circumstances As at 7 February 2007, France, Italy, Latvia, Poland and Spain had signed but not ratified Protocol No. 13.
; v tem oziru priznava, da bi se smernice o smrtni kazni izvajale skladneje, če bi države članice podpisale in ratificirale te protokole in konvencije;
; recognises, in that regard, that the guidelines on the death penalty could be implemented more coherently if Member States were to sign up to and ratify such protocols and conventions;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil med 1. in 3. februarjem 2007 v Parizu organiziran Tretji svetovni kongres proti smrtni kazni in se pridružuje njegovi končni deklaraciji; namerava nadaljevati z začrtanim delom kongresa, zlasti preko parlamentarne razsežnosti svetovne kampanje proti smrtni kazni in preko izpostavljanja zadeve na srečanjih medparlamentarnih delegacij in skupnih parlamentarnih skupščin; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj ob vsaki priložnosti podpreta vzpostavitev regionalnih koalicij držav, ki si prizadevajo za odpravo smrtne kazni, ter naj se zlasti osredotočita na arabske države;
Welcomes the organisation in Paris (1-3 February 2007) of the third World Congress against the Death Penalty and associates itself with its final declaration; intends to follow up on the Congress, notably by developing the parliamentary dimension of the global campaign against the death penalty and raising the matter through its inter-parliamentary delegations and participations in joint parliamentary assemblies; calls on the Council and the Commission to take every possible opportunity to support the establishment of regional abolitionist coalitions, with a special focus on Arab countries;
kot lep primer učinkovitega upoštevanja smernic EU o smrtni kazni pozdravlja usklajen in javni odziv predstavnikov EU v Peruju na predloge tamkajšnjih oblasti o razširitvi smrtne kazni v državi, ki so bili v nasprotju z določili peruanske ustave in ameriške konvencije o človekovih pravicah;
Welcomes – as a good example of the effective use of the EU guidelines on the death penalty – the coordinated and public reaction of EU representations in Peru to the proposals to extend the death penalty in that country in violation of the Peruvian constitution and the American Convention on Human Rights;
pozdravlja usklajeno in učinkovito akcijo (tako javno kot diplomatsko) Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta, Komisije, zadevnih držav članic in NVO, s katero so zagotovili suvereno odločitev pakistanskega predsednika, da spremeni smrtno kazen Mirze Tahirja Hussaina, britanskega državljana, ki je 18 let služil zaporno kazen na oddelku za obsojence na smrt v Pakistanu, ter da ga končno izpusti; poziva EU, naj še nadalje izpostavlja posamične primere v okviru smernic o smrtni kazni in predlaga, da Svet in Komisija v zvezi s tem učinkovito uporabita parlamentarno razsežnost, zlasti hitre in koristne posege medparlamentarnih delegacij;
Applauds the coordinated, effective action – both public and diplomatic – of the European Parliament, the Commission, concerned Member States and NGOs to secure the sovereign decision of the President of Pakistan to commute the death sentence imposed on, and ultimately release, Mirza Tahir Hussain, a British national who had served 18 years on death row in Pakistan; urges the EU to continue to raise individual cases under the death penalty guidelines and recommends that the Council and the Commission make effective use of the parliamentary dimension in this regard, having recourse, in particular, to timely and useful interventions by inter-parliamentary delegations;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je dne 22. junija 2006 začel veljati Izbirni protokol h Konvenciji proti mučenju (OPCAT); ugotavlja, da je do danes protokol podpisalo samo 19 držav članic EU, ratificiralo pa samo 9 članic Do vključno januarja 2007 so ga podpisale, a še ne ratificirale naslednje države: Avstrija (2003), Belgija (2005), Ciper (2004), Finska (2003), Francija (2005), Nemčija (2006), Italija (2003), Luksemburg (2005), Nizozemska (2005), Portugalska (2006) in Romunija (2007).
Welcomes the entry into force on 22 June 2006 of the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT); notes that only 19 EU Member States have so far signed and only 9 ratified the Protocol Signed but not yet ratified (as of January 2007): Austria (2003), Belgium (2005), Cyprus (2004), Finland (2003), France (2005), Germany (2006), Italy (2003), Luxembourg (2005), the Netherlands (2005), Portugal (2006) and Romania (2007).
To pomeni, da izbirnega protokola h Konvenciji proti mučenju zaenkrat niso ne podpisale ne ratificirale: Grčija, Madžarska, Irska, Latvija, Litva in Slovaška.
Therefore, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia have so far neither signed nor ratified the OPCAT.
; poziva vse države članice EU, ki Izbirnega protokola h Konvenciji proti mučenju še niso podpisale in ratificirale, da to storijo tekom prihajajočega leta;
; urges all EU Member States which have not so far signed and ratified the OPCAT to do so in the coming year;
pozdravlja sprejetje Mednarodne konvencije o varstvu vseh oseb pred prisilnim izginotjem; poziva vse države članice, naj jo nemudoma podpišejo in ratificirajo;
Welcomes the launch of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance; asks all EU Member States to sign and ratify it promptly;
priporoča, da EU v okviru smernic o mučenju še nadalje izpostavlja posamezne primere mučenja tako, kot je to storila s primeri smrtne kazni v okviru smernic o smrtni kazni;
Recommends that the EU continue to raise individual cases of torture under the torture guidelines in the same way as it has done with death penalty cases under the death penalty guideline;
soglaša z odločitvijo Sveta, da javnosti predstavi pogoje za določene ukrepe, in se zaveda, da je to prvi korak do večje preglednosti; poziva Svet in Komisijo, da še posebej upoštevata ugotovitve in priporočila parlamentarne študije o izvedbi smernic EU o mučenju in drugem krutem, nečloveškem ali ponižujočem ravnanju ali kaznovanju;
Approves of the Council's decision to make the terms of certain demarches public, and recognises this step as progress towards greater transparency; asks the Council and the Commission to take into particular consideration the conclusions and recommendations of Parliament's study concerning implementation of the EU guidelines on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
poudarja, da čeprav so bile smernice sprejete že leta 2001, je v zvezi z dejansko prakso mučenja le malokrat prišlo do političnega dialoga, izjav ali demarš; spodbuja prihodnja predsedstva, naj opravijo oceno in presojo ter osnujejo načrt za smernice o mučenju; poziva Svet, da v postopku vrednotenja smernic v prihodnje upošteva priporočila, ki jih nudi študija o tem vprašanju, ki jo je zahteval njegov Pododbor za človekove pravice znotraj Odbora za zunanje zadeve; spodbuja EU, da razširi polje izvajanja, zlasti z oblikovanjem postopka za opredelitev demarš v posameznih primerih v izbranih državah;
Underlines that, although those guidelines were adopted as long ago as 2001, the use of political dialogues, declarations and demarches in relation to the actual practice of torture has been minimal; encourages future Presidencies to carry out an assessment, evaluation and planning for the torture guidelines; calls on the Council to take into consideration the recommendations provided by the study on this matter requested by its Subcommittee on Human Rights within the Foreign Affairs Committee in the future process of evaluation of those guidelines; encourages the EU to broaden the scope of implementation, in particular by developing a procedure to identify and demarche on individual cases in selected countries;
priporoča nemškemu in portugalskemu predsedstvu, da nadaljujeta z demaršami v zvezi z mučenjem, kadar in kjer je to potrebno; vseeno poudarja, da same demarše niso dovolj in da bi bilo treba po temeljiti analizi lokalnih razmer dosledno izvajati druge dopolnilne ukrepe, na primer, prvič, z vzpostavitvijo tesnejših odnosov s skupinami civilne družbe, ki se ukvarjajo s problematiko mučenja in slabega ravnanja, drugič, z iskanjem učinkovitih načinov za posredovanje v posameznih primerih mučenja in slabega ravnanja in ne le v primerih, ki zadevajo znane zagovornike človekovih pravic, in tretjič, z zagotavljanjem skladnega in stalnega delovanja misij EU pri njihovih prizadevanjih proti mučenju in slabemu ravnanju v tretjih državah;
Recommends to the German and Portuguese Presidencies that they continue the series of demarches on torture when and where relevant; underlines nevertheless that demarches alone are not enough and that other complementary actions should be carried out consistently and after thorough analysis of local situations, for example by strengthening relations with civil society groups working in the field of torture and ill-treatment, considering efficient ways to address individual cases of torture and ill-treatment in addition to those involving well-known human rights defenders and ensuring the coherence and continuity of action of EU missions committed to fighting torture and ill-treatment in third countries;
poudarja, da redna navzočnost predsedstva ali sekretariata Sveta v ustreznih odborih ZN ter nadaljnje sodelovanje s Svetom Evrope in njegovim Odborom za preprečevanje nasilja lahko privedeta do precejšnjih in koristnih konkretnih rezultatov pri sprejemanju odločitev glede ukrepanja v zvezi z določenimi državami;
Emphasises that the regular presence of the Presidency or the Council Secretariat in the relevant UN Committees as well as further cooperation with the Council of Europe and its Committee for the Prevention of Torture can result in substantial and useful material input into decision-making concerning demarches towards certain countries;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da nadaljujeta s prakso posredovanja pri mednarodnih partnerjih EU v zvezi z ratifikacijo mednarodnih konvencij, ki prepovedujejo mučenje in slabo ravnanje pa tudi predpise o rehabilitaciji tistih, ki so preživeli mučenje; poziva EU, da boj proti mučenju in slabemu ravnanju obravnava kot najpomembnejšo prednostno nalogo politike na področju človekovih pravic, zlasti prek izboljšanega izvajanja smernic EU in vseh drugih instrumentov EU, kot je EIDHR ter s preprečevanjem državam članicam, da uporabijo diplomatska zagotovila s tretjimi državami, če obstaja realna nevarnost mučenja ali slabega ravnanja;
Urges the Council and the Commission to continue the practice of demarches in respect of all of the EU's international partners regarding the ratification of international conventions banning the use of torture and ill-treatment, as well as the provisions of rehabilitation to torture survivors; calls on the EU to regard the fight against torture and ill-treatment as a top priority of its human rights policy, in particular through enhanced implementation of the EU guidelines and all other EU instruments such as the EIDHR and by ensuring that EU Member States refrain from using diplomatic assurances with third countries where there is a real risk of people being subjected to torture or ill-treatment;
ponovno poudarja, da je pohabljanje ženskih spolnih organov kršitev človekove pravice do telesne celovitosti in je zaskrbljen zaradi poskusov, da se tovrstna pohabljanja uvrstijo med standardne medicinske posege;
Reaffirms that female genital mutilation is a violation of the human right to physical integrity and is alarmed at attempts to place such acts of mutilation in the same category as standard medical practices;