natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker morajo biti skupni ukrepi omejeni na področje pristojnosti Skupnosti, evropske pristope pa je treba sprejeti le, kadar obetajo, da bodo uspešnejši od nacionalnih ukrepov,
whereas joint measures must be confined to the Community's area of competence, and whereas European approaches should be adopted only when they promise to be more successful than national actions,
ker je treba ohraniti pravice državljanov EU in pravice do zaščite, zlasti zaščite podatkov, skupno pravosodje in notranje zadeve pa morajo ostati pod parlamentarnim nadzorom,
whereas EU citizens" rights and rights of protection, especially data protection, must be preserved, and whereas the common justice and home affairs policy must remain subject to parliamentary supervision,
ker mora biti preglednost v zakonodajnem postopku najpomembnejša in ker bi morali imeti državljani in nacionalni parlamenti možnost spremljati in nadzorovati oblikovanje in izvajanje politik, povezanih z OSVP,
whereas transparency in the law-making process must be paramount and whereas national parliaments and citizens should be able to follow and monitor the definition and implementation of AFSJ-related policies,
ker z Lizbonsko pogodbo predviden pristop Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ne bo vplival na zaščito temeljnih pravic v Uniji, ki temelji na Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in sodni praksi Sodišča, bo pa dragocen dejavnik dodatne zaščite, čeprav bo treba vzpostaviti jasno razlikovanje med pristojnostmi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti,
whereas the accession of the Union to the ECHR, provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon, will not affect the protection of fundamental rights in the Union based on the Charter and the case-law of the Court of Justice, and will constitute a precious element of supplementary protection, while bearing in mind that a clear distinction between the jurisdictions of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice will have to be established,
ker je za odločen in pravočasen boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, goljufijam in korupciji ter za zaščito finančnih interesov EU treba okrepiti policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje, v preiskave bolj sistematično vključevati Europol in Eurojust, ustanoviti evropsko javno tožilstvo ter doseči učinkovite in izmerljive rezultate; ker hočejo državljani EU imeti večjo vlogo pri preprečevanju korupcije,
whereas it is necessary, in the interests of combating organised crime, fraud and corruption in a robust and timely manner, and of protecting the financial interests of the EU, to strengthen police and judicial cooperation, to involve Europol and Eurojust more systematically in investigations, to create the office of European Prosecutor, and to achieve effective and measurable results, and whereas EU citizens want the EU to play an enhanced role in combating corruption,
ker morajo prednostne naloge za naslednjih pet let na področju civilnega sodstva odražati potrebe, ki jih izražajo posamezni državljani in podjetja,
whereas in the field of civil justice the priorities for the next five years must reflect the needs expressed by individual citizens and business,
ker vzajemno priznavanje, kot temeljni kamen OSVP, predpostavlja medsebojno spoštovanje in zaupanje v pravni sistem drugih držav; ker sta ti vrednoti možni le ob medsebojnem poznavanju in razumevanju kot osnovi za oblikovanje evropske pravosodne kulture,
whereas mutual recognition, as the cornerstone of the AFSJ, requires mutual trust and confidence in other countries' legal systems, and whereas those values can be secured only through mutual knowledge and understanding, thus creating a European judicial culture,
ker mora evropski pravosodni prostor temeljiti na evropski pravosodni kulturi odvetnikov, sodstva, in tožilcev, ki ne bo imela podlage zgolj v pravu Unije, temveč se bo razvila tudi z vzajemnim poznavanjem in razumevanjem nacionalnih sodnih sistemov, korenito prenovo univerzitetnih učnih načrtov, izmenjavami, študijskimi obiski in skupnim usposabljanjem ob dejavni podpori evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje in evropske pravne akademije,
whereas the European judicial area must be built on a European judicial culture among practitioners, the judiciary and prosecutors which is not only based on Union law but developed through mutual knowledge and understanding of the national judicial systems, a root-and-branch revamping of university curricula, exchanges, study visits and common training with the active support of the European Judicial Training Network and the Academy of European Law,
ker je vzajemno zaupanje odvisno tudi od rednih ocen, s katerimi so v procesu na nacionalni in evropski ravni ocenjeni učinkovitost in rezultati posameznih nacionalnih sistemov; ker je v tej zvezi treba omeniti neprecenljivo delo Evropske komisije za učinkovito pravosodje pri Svetu Evrope,
whereas mutual trust also depends on an ongoing valuation of the effectiveness and results of the various national systems, conducted at both the national and the European levels; whereas in this connection reference must be made to the invaluable work of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice at the Council of Europe,
ker morajo evropska omrežja v različnih sektorjih sodnega sistema (evropska mreža za sodniško usposabljanje, evropska mreža svetov za pravosodje, mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč Evropske unije, mreža evropskih generalnih državnih tožilcev Eurojustice, Evropska pravosodna mreža v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ter omrežja pravosodnih delavcev) igrati dejavno vlogo pri nadaljnjem oblikovanju evropske pravosodne kulture, ob upoštevanju resolucije Parlamenta z dne 10. septembra 1991 o vzpostavitvi evropske pravne akademije UL C 267, 14.10.1991, str.
whereas the European networks in the various sectors of the judicial system (the European Judicial Training Network, the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, the Network of the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of the European Union, the Eurojustice network of European Prosecutors-General, the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters, and networks of practitioners) must play an active role in the further realisation of a European judicial culture, and having regard to its resolution of 10 September 1991 on the establishment of a European Law Academy OJ C 267, 14.10.1991, p.
, njegovega stališča z dne 24. septembra 2002 o sprejetju sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
, its position of 24 September 2002 on the adoption of a Council decision setting up a European judicial training network OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
ker v zadnjih letih močno narašča kibernetski kriminal, kar povzroča zapletene sodne izzive in obremenjuje zmogljivosti sodišč; ker je treba zaradi takšnega razvoja dogodkov preučiti možnost ustanovitve evropskega sodišča za kibernetske zadeve, ki bo specializirano za zadeve v zvezi s kibernetskim kriminalom,
whereas cybercrime has been significantly increasing over the past years, leading to more complex judicial challenges and placing a burden on the capacities of courts; whereas, on account of these developments, it is necessary to examine the setting-up of a European Court of Cyber Affairs specialising in matters related to cybercrime,
ugotavlja, da se bo novi večletni program OSVP verjetno sprejel in izvajal v skladu z novim pravnim okvirom, opredeljenim z Lizbonsko pogodbo, zaradi česar mora že vsebovati vse novosti, ki so vključene v njej in v skladu s katerimi:
Notes that the new multiannual programme in the AFSJ is likely to be adopted and implemented under the new legal framework defined by the Treaty of Lisbon, so that it must already embody all the innovations therein according to which:
se schengensko sodelovanje, ki pomeni svobodo gibanja oseb v EU, potrdi kot jedro OVSP, schengensko območje pa bi bilo treba dodatno razširiti;
Schengen cooperation, which enshrines the freedom of movement of persons within the EU, is confirmed as the core of the AFSJ and the Schengen area should be further enlarged;
varstvo in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic vsake osebe ter oblikovanje Evrope pravic, pravičnosti, solidarnosti in različnosti so nedeljive osrednje vrednote evropskih politik; so v ospredju evropske agende, dolžnost institucij EU pa bo, da bodo spoštovale načelo enakih pravic vseh ljudi;
the protection and promotion of every person's fundamental rights and the building of a Europe of rights, justice, solidarity and diversity are undivided core values of European policies; they are at the top of the European agenda, and the EU institutions will be called upon to respect the principle of equal rights for all people;
se bo proces sprejemanja odločitev okrepil z uporabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, nad vsem pa bo sodni nadzor izvajalo Sodišče;
the decision-making process will be strengthened by the use of the ordinary legislative procedure, all under the judicial supervision of the Court of Justice;
bodo dodatne varovalke zagotovile dosledno spoštovanje načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti v OSVP z zagotavljanjem, da bo lahko določeno število nacionalnih parlamentov sprožilo "postopke opozarjanja", pa tudi s tem, da bo imela posamezna država članica pravico do uporabe "zasilne zavore", ko bo menila, da utegne osnutek pravnega instrumenta na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah vplivati na bistvene elemente njene notranje nacionalne ureditve; uporaba "zasilne zavore" bo praviloma vodila v okrepljeno sodelovanje med skupino držav, ki bodo želele integrirati svoje politike;
additional safeguards will secure strict respect for the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality in the AFSJ by ensuring that a number of national parliaments can launch an "alert procedure" as well as by conferring on a single Member State the right to make use of an "emergency brake" when it considers that a draft legal instrument in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters is liable to affect essential elements of its internal national order; the use of the emergency brake will normally lead to enhanced cooperation among a core group of States that wish to integrate their policies;
ugotavlja, da bodo ukrepi EU postali bolj verodostojni s tem, ko bodo utemeljeni na novem ali preoblikovanem pravnem okviru, ki bo vključeval nove določbe o varstvu temeljnih pravic, tudi pravic narodnih manjšin, nove določbe za preprečevanje vseh oblik neenakosti, zlasti med moškimi in ženskami (člen 8 PDEU), ali vseh oblik diskriminacije (člen 10 PDEU), določbe za spodbujanje preglednosti v vseh institucijah, organih, uradih in agencijah EU (člen 15 PDEU), določbe o varstvu osebnih podatkov pred zlorabami s strani zasebnih ali javnih subjektov (člen 16 PDEU), o konzularni in diplomatski zaščiti (člen 23 PDEU), o skupnih politikah na področju azila in priseljevanja (člen 77 in nasl.
Observes that EU action will become more credible as it will be founded on a new or reshaped legal framework, including new provisions on the protection of fundamental rights, including rights of national minorities, new provisions for the prevention of any form of inequality, especially between men and women (Article 8 TFEU), or any form of discrimination (Article 10 TFEU), provisions promoting transparency in all the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies (Article 15 TFEU), provisions on the protection of personal data from the abuses of private or public entities (Article 16 TFEU), on consular and diplomatic protection (Article 23 TFEU), on common policies in the fields of asylum and immigration (Article 77 et seq.
poudarja, kako pomembno je, da se pristojnost Sodišča razširi brez omejitev, kar velja tako za njegovo predhodno odločanje o vseh vprašanjih OSVP kot za to, da Komisija lahko sproži postopek za ugotavljanje kršitve Treba je upoštevati člen 10 Protokola 36 o prehodnih določbah in člen 276 PDEU.
Emphasises the importance of extending without restriction the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice, both in order to deliver preliminary rulings on any question arising from the AFSJ and in order to allow the Commission to launch infringement proceedings Subject to Article 10 of Protocol 36 on transitional provisions and to Article 276 of the TFEU.
poudarja, da je za državljane in podjetja v evropskem OSVP dostop do sodnega varstva bolj zapleten in manj pregleden zaradi nacionalnih odstopanj in da bi se bilo treba zato tem odstopanjem, kjer je to mogoče, izogibati zaradi pravičnosti, doslednosti in enostavnosti;
Points out that access to justice for citizens and enterprises across Europe's AFSJ is rendered more complicated and less transparent by the existence of national opt-outs, and that accordingly, in the interests of fairness, coherence and simplicity, these should be avoided wherever possible;
meni, da načelo solidarnosti med državami članicami in med državami članicami in Unijo z OSVP dobiva poseben pomen in se mora pretvoriti v aktivno, obvezno solidarnost zlasti kar zadeva nadzor na mejah, priseljevanje, civilno zaščito in solidarnostno klavzulo;
Considers that the principle of solidarity between Member States, and between Member States and the Union, takes on particular significance in the AFSJ and must be converted into active, compulsory solidarity particularly as regards border control, immigration, civil protection and the solidarity clause;
poudarja, da EU temelji na načelu svobode; poudarja, da si je treba v podporo tej svobodi prizadevati za varnost v skladu s pravno državo in z obveznostmi, ki izhajajo iz temeljnih pravic; izjavlja, da je na ravnovesje med varnostjo in svobodo treba gledati s tega vidika;
Stresses that the EU is rooted in the principle of freedom; points out that, in support of that freedom, security must be pursued in accordance with the rule of law and subject to fundamental rights obligations; states that the balance between security and freedom must be seen from this perspective;
meni, da bi moral Stockholmski program še posebej:
Considers that the Stockholm programme should in particular:
obravnavati problem migracij in solidarnosti;
address the problems of migration in solidarity;
doseči boljše ravnotežje med varnostjo državljanov (t. j. varovanje zunanjih meja, pregon čezmejnega kriminala) in varovanjem njihovih pravic;
strike a better balance between the security of citizens (e.g. protection of external borders, prosecution of trans-border crime) and the protection of their individual rights;
zagotoviti državljanom pravičen dostop do sodnega varstva in
provide citizens with fair access to justice; and
rešiti praktične probleme, s katerimi se državljani v Evropski uniji soočajo pri zadevah, za katere veljajo različni pravni redi;
settle the practical problems which citizens face in the European Union in matters subject to different legal orders;
poudarja, da je v novem pravnem in institucionalnem okviru, ki ga oblikuje Lizbonska pogodba, mogoče razviti nadaljnje ukrepe v OSVP le ob pravočasni in ustrezni vključitvi Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov ter civilne družbe, da se vzpostavi odprta in stalna razprava;
Points out that in the new legal and institutional framework created by the Treaty of Lisbon further action in the AFSJ can be developed only by duly associating the European Parliament and national parliaments and civil society in an appropriate manner, with a view to building an open and continuous debate;
poziva k preglednejšim zakonodajnim postopkom na ravni EU in na nacionalni ravni in pozdravlja uporabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, ki bodo zagotavljal kar najširšo uporabo pravice dostopa do dokumentov in informacij v procesu sprejemanja odločitev, zlasti kadar bi predlogi lahko vplivali na pravice posameznika in državljana, ne glede na to, ali pobudo predloži Komisija ali skupina držav članic;
Calls for a more transparent law-making process at EU and national level and welcomes the use of the ordinary legislative procedure, which will allow for the widest application of the right of access to documents and information in the decision-making process, especially in cases where a proposal could affect the rights of the individual and of the citizen, regardless of whether the initiative is submitted by the Commission or by a group of Member States;
napoveduje, da se v korist pregledne priprave zakonodaje na mednarodni ravni, kjer je Komisija pridobila pristojnosti na ravni Skupnosti, Parlamentu pa je ostala zgolj pravica do soglasja – to je zlasti razvidno iz dogodkov, povezanih s Haaško konferenco o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu – zavezuje tesnemu spremljanju poteka Haaške konference o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu; zavezuje se, da bo podprl oblikovanje parlamentarnega foruma, ki bo dostopen zainteresiranim poslancem Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, z namenom zagotavljanja sredstva za obveščanje parlamentarcev o poteku konference ter o njenemu delu in dosežkih in da bi omogočil javno razpravo o različnih vprašanjih;
Announces – in the interests of transparent law-making at an international level where the Commission has gained Community competence, leaving Parliament merely with the right of assent, as is particularly evidenced by the developments in connection with the Hague Conference on Private International Law – that it is committed to following developments at the Hague Conference on Private International Law closely; undertakes to sponsor the creation of a Parliamentary Forum, open to interested MEPs and members of national parliaments, with a view to providing a means of informing parliamentarians about developments in the Conference and its work and achievements and allowing the various issues to be debated in a public forum;
ugotavlja, da je v OSVP trenutno več sistemov ocenjevanja in da jih je treba združiti v enoten in skladen okvir, ki bo vključeval vse vidike, od predhodnega ocenjevanja do ocenjevanja izvrševanja zakonodaje,
notes that there are currently several evaluation systems in place in the AFSJ and that these need to be consolidated into a single and coherent framework, covering all aspects from ex-ante evaluations to the evaluation of the implementation of legislation,
meni, da bi moralo biti ocenjevanje, ki ga opravljajo različni organi EU, bolj usklajeno,
considers that evaluations carried out by different EU bodies should be better coordinated,
poziva k vzpostavitvi sistema ocenjevanja, ki bi Parlamentu in nacionalnim parlamentom omogočal dostop do informacij, povezanih s politiko (člen 70 PDEU) in dejavnostmi odbora za notranjo varnost (člen 71 PDEU), Europola (člen 88 PDEU) in Eurojusta (člen 85 PDEU), skupaj z Evropsko agencijo za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (Frontex), Evropskim uradom za podporo azilu in schengenskim sistemom, pri tem ocenjuje, da bi Parlament moral imeti pravico podati zavezujoče mnenje pri imenovanju direktorjev agencij (saj je Parlament tudi proračunski organ),
calls for the creation of the evaluation system to give Parliament and national parliaments access to information related to the policies (Article 70 of the TFEU) and activities of the internal security committee (Article 71 of the TFEU) as well as of EUROPOL (Article 88 of the TFEU) and Eurojust (Article 85 of the TFEU), together with the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex), the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) and the Schengen system; considers, in this framework, that Parliament should be granted the right to deliver a binding opinion on the appointment of the agencies' directors (as Parliament is also the budgetary authority),
nadalje meni, da bi bilo za utrditev sodelovanja med Parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti v okviru območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, smiselno vzpostaviti stalni forum predstavnikov na politični ravni (po dva predstavnika na zbornico in njihova namestnika), ki bi se sestal dvakrat letno in vzpostavil skupni delovni prostor, kjer bi lahko takoj izmenjali vse informacije, povezane z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, tudi tiste interne narave, nadalje meni, da bi moralo biti predstavnikom nacionalnih parlamentov omogočeno, da se udeležijo postopkov Parlamenta na ravni odborov ter na letni razpravi o napredku območja svobode, varnosti in pravice;
considers further that, in order to frame Parliament's cooperation with national parliaments within the AFSJ, it would be worth creating a permanent forum of representatives at political level (two per Chamber + two substitutes) meeting twice a year and sharing a common workspace where all the information dealing with the AFSJ, including that of a restricted nature, could be shared in real time); considers also that the representatives of the national parliaments should be allowed to attend Parliament's proceedings at committee level and during Parliament's annual debate on the progress of the AFSJ;
meni, da bi bilo treba dati prednost zmanjševanju velike vrzeli med predpisi in politiko, odobrenimi na evropski ravni, in njihovim izvrševanjem na nacionalni ravni;
Considers that priority should be given to narrowing the wide gap between the rules and policies approved at European level and their implementation at national level;
meni, da sta učinkovita zaščita in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic osnova demokracije v Evropi in glavni pogoj za utrditev OSVP; zato je trdno prepričan, da sta Svet in Komisija odgovorna, da dejavno predlagata ukrepe za spodbujanje temeljnih pravic;
Considers that effective protection and promotion of fundamental rights form the basis of democracy in Europe and are prerequisites for the consolidation of the AFSJ; therefore firmly believes that the Council and the Commission have a responsibility actively to propose measures to promote fundamental rights;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z razvojem Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, upoštevajoč Lizbonsko pogodbo in posledice povezave med Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice in institucijami EU;
Calls on the Commission further to develop the interinstitutional agreement in the light of the Treaty of Lisbon and the consequences of the link between the ECHR, the European Court of Human Rights and the EU institutions;
zahteva jasen in izčrpen predlog o pravicah, ki naj bodo zajamčene obtožencem, da se jim zagotovi pravično sojenje, in zavrača postopen pristop, ki se trenutno uporablja;
Demands a clear and comprehensive proposal on the rights to be secured to defendants in order to ensure that they receive a fair trial, and rejects the incremental approach currently adopted;
opozarja, da Listina o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije z Lizbonsko pogodbo postaja zavezujoča v enaki meri kot pogodbe, kar pomeni, da se bo v celoti uporabljala za vse sprejete ukrepe na področju OSVP, njeno spoštovanje pa bo nadzorovalo Sodišče; vseeno obžaluje, da je uvedba protokola omejila učinek Listine na nacionalno zakonodajo dveh držav članic, in ponovno izraža skrb, da bi zaradi tega lahko prišlo do neenakega obravnavanja med ljudmi;
Recalls that, with the Treaty of Lisbon, the Charter will become binding, on the same footing as the Treaties, and entirely applicable to all measures taken under the AFSJ, and that compliance with the Charter will be monitored by the Court of Justice; deplores, however, the introduction of the protocol limiting the effect of the Charter on the domestic law of two Member States and reiterates its concerns about the inequality among people this may produce;