natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če spol v politično razmišljanje ni vključen že od vsega začetka, obstaja nevarnost, da projekti in predlogi privzeto ustvarjajo pristransko predstavo: oseba, na katero se nanašajo, je samoumevno bel, zdrav, heteroseksualen moški s stalno zaposlitvijo.
If gender is not incorporated into political discussions from the outset, the resulting projects and proposals are in danger of being biased by default, through use of an implicitly white, able-bodied, heterosexual male in permanent employment as their reference model.
Razširitev naše predstave ni samo vprašanje pravičnosti, ampak predvsem učinkovitosti.
We must broaden our outlook not just as a matter of justice but in order to make our actions more effective.
Ženske namreč predstavljajo polovico prebivalstva in imajo precejšnjo moč delovanja in vpliva.
Women form half the population and have significant potential for action and impact.
Poročevalka je želela poudariti priložnosti, ki jih prinaša upoštevanje žensk: če iz naših podnebnih politik nezavedno izpustimo polovico državljanov tega sveta, se odrečemo ogromni zakladnici znanj, ukrepov in vzvodov.
Your rapporteur has sought to highlight the opportunities presented by including women: at the moment we are failing to tap a vast reservoir of ideas, actions and leverage mechanisms by unconsciously excluding half the world's citizens from our climate policies.
Nezadostna povezava med spolom in podnebnimi spremembami?
Gender and climate change: the missing link?
Kljub prizadevanjem Evropske unije, da bi okoljska vprašanja v svoje politike vključila kot večsektorsko politiko, in kljub že ugotovljenim povezavam med spolom in razvojnimi politikami, povezave med spoloma in politikami ublažitve posledic podnebnih sprememb, zlasti znotraj Evropske unije, niso raziskane ali se ne uporabljajo.
Although the European Union has made efforts to include environmental considerations as a cross-cutting policy and the links between gender and development policy are well established, the link between gender and mitigation policy, especially within the EU, has been neither explored nor used.
Kljub temu poročilo Evropskega parlamenta o vključevanju načela enakosti spolov v politike poudarja pomen spodbujanja enakosti med ženskami in moškimi v vseh politikah Evropske unije.
And yet Parliament's report on gender mainstreaming stresses the importance of promoting male-female equality in all EU policies.
Izražamo željo, da razsežnosti spola ne bi bilo treba upravičevati za vsako področje posebej in da njeno upoštevanje ne bi bilo omejeno na vprašanje zastopanosti žensk v politiki ali gospodarstvu.
It is to be hoped that it will not be necessary to justify the importance of gender mainstreaming field by field and that awareness will not be confined to matters of women's representation in politics and the economy.
Za izvajanje celostne politike, ki spodbuja enakost med ženskami in moškimi, je treba preučiti bolj implicitne izvore neenakosti.
The implementation of a comprehensive policy to promote male-female equality calls for close study of the less explicit causes of inequality.
Če oblikovanja politik ne spremlja zavestno prizadevanje za upoštevanje enakosti spolov, lahko te politike negativno vplivajo na prizadevanja za dosego enakosti med ženskami in moškimi.
When policies are drawn up without a conscious effort to include gender mainstreaming, they run the risk of obstructing efforts to achieve equality between women and men.
Pomanjkanje raziskav in številčnih podatkov, ki bi bili razčlenjeni po spolu in bi jih lahko uporabili pri teh raziskavah na področjih, kot so promet, energija in kmetijska politika, onemogoča boljše razumevanje in boljše upoštevanje razsežnosti spola.
Progress towards better understanding and increased awareness of gender issues is hampered by the lack of research, and of gender-disaggregated data with which to carry it out, in fields such as transport, energy and agricultural policy.
Da bi se izognili nastanku nesmiselnih dodatnih upravnih stroškov, predlagamo, da se to zbiranje podatkov sistematično izvaja samo pri zagonu novih projektov ali med rednimi fazami ocenjevanja obstoječih projektov.
To avoid generating unreasonable administrative overheads, we propose that this type of data collection should only be systematically used when launching new projects or for the periodic evaluation of existing ones.
Dostop do teh novih podatkov bo raziskovalcem in raziskovalkam omogočil analiziranje in oblikovanje predlogov za leta, ki prihajajo.
Access to this new data will enable researchers to carry out analyses and draw up new proposals for the years to come.
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za pravice žensk in enakost spolov kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
3. opozarja, da je medvladni forum o podnebnih spremembah (IPCC) leta 2007 v svojem četrtem ocenjevalnem poročilu potrdil, da so posledice podnebnih sprememb različne glede na spol, starost in razred, pri čemer je za revne najverjetneje, da bodo najbolj trpeli; poudarja, da mora pogajalski proces za okvirno konvencijo Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja v vseh fazah, od raziskav in analize do zasnove in izvajanja ter oblikovanja strategij blažitve in prilagajanja, upoštevati načela enakosti spolov;
Recalls that, in its 2007 4th Assessment Report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confirmed that the impact of climate change varies according to gender, age and class, with the poor most likely to suffer the most; underlines that the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiation process must at all stages, from research and analysis to design and implementation and the creation of mitigation and adaptation strategies, take into account the principles of gender equality;
8. opozarja, da so ženske po vsem svetu dejavnejše v civilni družbi in da sta torej spodbujanje mrež ženskih organizacij in dejavnosti civilne družbe ter podpora le-tem pomemben korak naprej;
Points out that women are globally more active in activities at civil society level, and thus the facilitation and support of networks of women’s organisations and civil society activities are important steps forward;
– vključijo vidik enakosti spolov v svoje nacionalne politike, akcijske načrte in druge ukrepe, povezane s trajnostnim razvojem, tveganjem nesreč in podnebnimi spremembami, in sicer z izvajanjem sistematičnih analiz vidika enakosti spolov, z oblikovanjem kazalnikov in meril, ki bodo upoštevali vidik enakosti spolov, ter z razvijanjem praktičnih orodij;
– mainstream gender perspectives into their national policies, action plans and other measures relating to sustainable development, disaster risk and climate change by carrying out systematic gender analyses, establishing gender-sensitive indicators and benchmarks and developing practical tools;
– razvijejo programe za ublažitev posledic podnebnih sprememb in prilagoditev nanje, ki za izboljšanje dobrobiti žensk in deklet uporabljajo analizo po spolu – npr. dostop do posojila, storitve za krepitev zmogljivosti in svetovalne storitve, širjenje informacij, izboljšan dostop do zemlje, naravnih virov, trajnostne energije in tehnologije ter dostop do informacij o reproduktivnem zdravju in z njim povezanih storitev;
– develop climate change mitigation and adaptation programmes that use gender analysis to improve the welfare of women and girls – e.g. access to credit, capacity building and extension services, information dissemination, improved access to land and natural resources, sustainable energy and technology and access to reproductive health information and services;
– zagotovijo, da se bodo potrebe in prednostne naloge žensk odražale v mehanizmih financiranja, in vključijo dejavno sodelovanje žensk v razvoj meril za financiranje in dodelitev sredstev za pobude s področja podnebnih sprememb, zlasti na lokalni ravni;
– reflect women’s priorities and needs in financing mechanisms and include the active participation of women in the development of funding criteria and allocation of resources for climate change initiatives, particularly at local level;
20. poudarja potrebo po širšem in učinkovitejšem razvoju podnebne diplomacije EU v vseh mednarodnih pogajanjih o podnebju; meni, da bi povečanje udeležbe žensk in njihove vloge na tem področju z uvedbo koncepta „mehke sile“ lahko imelo pozitiven vpliv;
Stresses the need for a wider and more effective development of EU climate diplomacy in all international climate negotiations; considers that reinforcing the involvement and empowerment of women in this field by introducing the ‘soft power’ concept could have a positive influence;
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Yves Cochet, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Zofija Mazej Kukovič, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Milan Cabrnoch, Martin Callanan, Nessa Childers, Yves Cochet, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Julie Girling, Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Zofija Mazej Kukovič, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Frédérique Ries, Oreste Rossi, Dagmar Roth-Behrendt, Daciana Octavia Sârbu, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bogusław Sonik, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Glenis Willmott, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
Gaston Franco, Jutta Haug, Bill Newton Dunn, Michèle Rivasi, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Andrea Zanoni
Gaston Franco, Jutta Haug, Bill Newton Dunn, Michèle Rivasi, Eleni Theocharous, Andrea Zanoni
Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Kent Johansson, Christa Klaß, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Ana Miranda, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Katarína Neveďalová, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Sirpa Pietikäinen
Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Kent Johansson, Christa Klaß, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Ana Miranda, Mariya Nedelcheva, Katarína Neveďalová, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Sirpa Pietikäinen
o zahtevi za odvzem imunitete Krisztini Morvai
on the request for waiver of the immunity of Krisztina Morvai
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odvzem imunitete Krisztini Morvai, ki jo je 13. oktobra 2010 posredovalo osrednje okrožno sodišče Pešta v Budimpešti (Madžarska) v zvezi s postopkom pred tem sodiščem in ki je bila razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 24. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the request for waiver of the immunity of Krisztina Morvai, forwarded on 13 October 2010 by the Pest Central District Court in Budapest (Hungary) in connection with proceedings pending before that court and announced in plenary on 24 November 2010,
– po zagovoru Krisztine Morvai v skladu s členom 7(3) Poslovnika,
– having heard Krisztina Morvai, in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju pisne dokumentacije osrednjega okrožnega sodišča v Pešti z dne 19. decembra 2011 kot odgovor na prošnjo Odbora za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 7(3) poslovnika po dodatnih informacijah in pojasnilih,
– having regard to the written submissions from the Pest Central District Court of 19 December 2011 in reply to the request of the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 7(3) for further information and explanations,
– ob upoštevanju členov 8 in 9 Protokola (št. 7) o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije z dne 8. aprila 1965 ter člena 6(2) Akta o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami z dne 20. septembra 1976,
– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol (No 7) on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, annexed to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0050/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0050/2012 ),
A. ker je osrednje okrožno sodišče v Pešti zahtevalo odvzem parlamentarne imunitete poslanki Evropskega parlamenta Krisztini Morvai v zvezi s postopkom, ki proti njej teče pred tem sodiščem;
A. whereas the Pest Central District Court has requested the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of a Member of the European Parliament, Krisztina Morvai, in connection with proceedings before it;
B. ker se zahteva sodišča navezuje na kazenski postopek v zvezi s kazenskim dejanjem zoper čast in dobro ime, ki naj bi ga Krisztina Morvai zagrešila z izjavami o fizični osebi na Madžarskem;
B. whereas the request by the Court relates to criminal proceedings relating to the criminal offence of public defamation in connection with statements made by Krisztina Morvai concerning a private individual in Hungary;
C. ker se v skladu s členom 8 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti;
C. whereas, according to Article 8 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties;
D. ker dejstva v tej zadevi, kot so prikazana v dokumentaciji peštanskega sodišča Odboru za pravne zadeve, kažejo, da gre za izjave Krisztine Morvai, ko ta še ni bila poslanka Evropskega parlamenta;
D. whereas the facts of the case, as manifested in the submissions from the Court to the Committee on Legal Affairs, indicate that the statements were made at a time when Krisztina Morvai was not a Member of the European Parliament;
Na zasedanju 24. novembra 2010 je predsednik v skladu s členom 6(2) Poslovnika razglasil, da je 13. oktobra 2010 prejel zahtevo osrednjega okrožnega sodišča v Pešti za odvzem poslanske imunitete Krisztini Morvai v skladu s členoma 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske Unije.
At the sitting of 24 November 2010 the President announced, under Rule 6(2) of the Rules of Procedure, that on 13 October 2010 he had received a request from the Pest Central District Court concerning the waiver of the parliamentary immunity of Krisztina Morvai with reference to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Union.
Pismo je v skladu s členom 6(2) Poslovnika posredoval Odboru za pravne zadeve.
The President referred this request to the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 6(2).
Sodišče je dodatne informacije in pojasnila poslalo v pismu z dne 19. decembra 2011.
The Court provided the requested information and explanations in a letter of 19 December 2011.
Ozadje zahteve za odvzem imunitete je naslednje: 14. aprila 2005 je János Zombori, bivajoč v Nemčiji, pri glavni policijski upravi v Budimpešti, Madžarska, vložil tožbo zoper „neznane storilce“ za kaznivo dejanje zoper čast in dobro ime po členu 179(1) madžarskega kazenskega zakonika, ki se nanaša na večje število poročil v tiskanih medijih, na svetovnem spletu in na televiziji marca in aprila 2005 o tem, da naj bi Zombori fizično in mentalno zlorabil svojega sina.
The background to the request for waiver is as follows: On 14 April 2005, Mr János Zombori, a resident of Germany, filed a complaint with the National Police Department in Budapest, Hungary, against “unknown perpetrators” for the offence of public defamation under Article 179(1) of the Hungarian Criminal Code, which referred to a large number of media reports in printed articles, on the Internet and on television dating from March and April 2005 in which Mr Zombori was alleged to have physically and mentally abused his son.
Po zaslišanju tožeče stranke 6. decembra 2006 je sodišče odredilo začetek preiskave.
After hearing the complainant on 6 December 2006, the Court directed that an investigation be initiated.
Sodišče je 28. maja 2008 pripravilo zaslišanje, na katerega sta bila pravilno pozvana tožeča stranka in Krisztina Morvai, vendar sta se obe stranki opravičili, sodišče pa je tedaj odločilo, da loči postopek v dve zadevi, eno zoper identificirane domnevne storilce in eno zoper še neidentificirane osebe.
The Court held a hearing on 28 May 2008, to which both the complainant and Krisztina Morvai had been duly summoned but had justified their absence, at which it decided to separate the proceedings into two cases, one concerning the identified alleged perpetrators and one concerning still unidentified persons.
Zaradi pomanjkanja identificiranih oseb v tej drugi zadevi se je sodišče 15. decembra 2008 odločilo, da postopek zaključi.
Because of the lack of identified persons in the latter case, the Court decided on 15 December 2008 to terminate those proceedings.
Tožeča stranka se je zoper to odločitev pritožila pred občinskim sodiščem v Budimpešti, nakar je to 26. februarja 2009 odločitev razveljavilo in postopek je bil obnovljen.
This decision was appealed by the complainant, and the Municipal Court of Budapest quashed the decision on 26 February 2009 and the proceedings therefore recommenced.
Sodišče je 30. septembra 2009 pripravilo zaslišanje, ker pa tožeča stranka nanj ni prišla, je bilo prestavljeno na 4. maj 2010, po katerem je bila tožeča stranka pozvana, da pojasni obtožbe.
A hearing was set by the Court for 30 September 2009, but since the complainant did not appear it was postponed until 4 May 2010, following which the complainant was invited to clarify the accusations.
23. junija 2010 je tožeča stranka naznanila, da želi nadaljevanje kazenskega postopka proti dvema identificiranima domnevnima storilcema, ki sta dala specifične izjave na televiziji, ena med njima pa je bila Krisztina Morvai.
On 23 June 2010, the complainant indicated that he wished criminal proceedings to go ahead against two identified alleged perpetrators who had made specified statements on television, one of whom was Krisztina Morvai.
Sodišče je postopek prekinilo 8. oktobra 2010, da bi Evropski parlament zaprosilo, naj Krisztini Morvai odvzame poslansko imuniteto.
The Court suspended the proceedings on 8 October 2010 in order to make a request to the European Parliament to waive the parliamentary immunity of Krisztina Morvai.
Sodišče je odbor obvestilo, da po madžarskem kazenskem zakoniku zastaralni rok za kaznivo dejanje ustreza zgornji meji predpisane kazni, vendar ni krajši od treh let.
The Court has informed the Committee that the limitation period under the Hungarian Criminal Code for an offence is a period corresponding to the upper limit of the prescribed punishment but no shorter that three years.
Ker je po kazenskem zakoniku predpisana kazen za kazniva dejanja zoper čast in dobro ime dve leti, je zastaralni rok zanj torej najmanj tri leta.
Since the prescribed punishment for public defamation is two years under the Criminal Code, the limitation period for this offence is therefore the minimum of three years.
Tek zastaralnega roka se prekine, ko steče kazenski postopek proti domnevnim storilcem.
This limitation period is however interrupted by the initiation of criminal proceedings against alleged offenders.
Po mnenju Krisztine Morvai bi moral Parlament njeno poslansko imuniteto podpreti.
For her part, Krisztina Morvai submits that Parliament should uphold her parliamentary immunity.
Zastaralni rok je torej pretekel 8. oktobra 2010, ko je bila izdana zahteva za odvzem poslanske imunitete.
The limitation period had therefore expired on 8 October 2010, when the request for waiver of the parliamentary immunity was made.
Krisztina Morvai meni, da sta tožeča stranka in sodišče postopek zoper njo sprožila šele potem, ko je bila leta 2009 že izvoljena za poslansko Evropskega parlamenta.
She considers that the complainant and the Court pursued the proceedings against her only after she had been elected Member of the European Parliament in 2009.
Zoper poslanca Evropskega parlamenta se ne sme začeti preiskava, ne sme biti priprt niti se zoper njega ne sme začeti sodni postopek zaradi mnenja ali glasu, ki ga je izrekel pri opravljanju svojih dolžnosti .
Members of the European Parliament shall not be subject to any form of inquiry, detention or legal proceedings in respect of opinions expressed or votes cast by them in the performance of their duties .
Med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta njeni člani uživajo: a.
During the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members shall enjoy: a.
na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane članom parlamenta te države ; b.
in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament ; b.
na ozemlju drugih držav članic imuniteto pred kakršnim koli ukrepom ali priporom in sodnim postopkom.
in the territory of other Member States, immunity from any measure or detention and from legal proceedings.
Postopek v Evropskem parlamentu urejata člena 6 in 7 poslovnika.
The procedure in the European Parliament is governed by Rules 6 and 7 of the Rules of Procedure.
Ustrezne določbe se glasijo (poudarki so dodani):
The relevant provisions read as follows (emphasis added):
Parlament si pri izvajanju svojih pooblastil v zvezi s privilegiji in imunitetami predvsem prizadeva ohranjati integriteto kot demokratična zakonodajna skupščina in zagotoviti neodvisnost poslancev pri opravljanju njihovih nalog .
In the exercise of its powers in respect of privileges and immunities, Parliament shall seek primarily to uphold its integrity as a democratic legislative assembly and to secure the independence of its Members in the performance of their duties .
Člen 7 – Postopki v zvezi z imuniteto
Rule 7 - Procedures on immunity
Zadevni poslanec ima možnost zagovora ; predloži lahko vse dokumente ali druge pisne dokaze, ki se mu zdijo pomembni. (...) 7.
The Member concerned shall be given an opportunity to be heard , may present any documents or other written evidence deemed by that Member to be relevant and may be represented by another Member. (...) 7.
Odbor lahko poda obrazloženo mnenje o pristojnosti organa in dopustnosti zahteve, vendar se v nobenem primeru ne izreče niti o krivdi ali nekrivdi poslanca niti o tem, ali mnenja oziroma dejanja, ki so mu pripisana, upravičujejo kazenski pregon, četudi se pri obravnavi zahteve podrobno seznani z dejstvi primera.
The committee may offer a reasoned opinion about the competence of the authority in question and the admissibility of the request, but shall not, under any circumstances, pronounce on the guilt or otherwise of the Member nor on whether or not the opinions or acts attributed to him or her justify prosecution, even if, in considering the request, it acquires detailed knowledge of the facts of the case.