natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da so glede na vse večje število sektorjev, ki jih pokriva sistem enotnega plačila in glede na izkušnje, pridobljene pri izvajanju tega sistema, nekatere odločitve in pravila izvajanja nepotrebno toga in zapletena ter da je zato treba na novo opredeliti pravila, doseg in ustrezno vodenje izvajanja sistema v tistih državah članicah, ki to želijo;
Believes that, given the increasing number of sectors covered by the Single Payment Scheme (SPS), and in light of the experience obtained in implementing that regime, certain decisions and implementing rules appear to be unnecessarily rigid and complicated, and that it therefore seems necessary to redefine the rules, scope and suitable management patterns of its implementation in those Member States and sectors which so wish;
meni, da je ločitev neposrednih plačil na splošno pripeljala do uspešne tržne usmeritve kmetijstva EU, kar se kaže v povečanem učinku na dohodek in večji avtonomiji odločanja kmetov ter s tem povezani poenostavitvi skupne kmetijske politike; poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za pospešeno uveljavitev politike ločitve, razen kadar bi to povzročilo znatno družbeno, ekonomsko ali okoljevarstveno škodo v posameznih regijah, zlasti v regijah z najbolj omejenimi možnostmi; vendar ugotavlja, da je treba pripraviti nove presoje vpliva, da bo mogoče celostno ugotoviti učinke ločitve za posamezne regije, za proizvodnjo in za trg z zemljišči;
Considers that decoupling of direct payments has in general led to a successful market orientation of EU agriculture, given the increased effect on income and greater autonomy in decision-making on the part of farmers and the associated simplification of the CAP; calls on the Commission to push through the decoupling policy at a faster pace, unless this were to result in considerable social, economic or environmental drawbacks in certain regions, in particular the least favoured regions; notes however, that further impact assessments are to be prepared in order to comprehensively determine the effects of decoupling for specific regions, for production and the land market;
meni, da lahko na splošno nevezana neposredna pomoč iz kmetijske proizvodnje dolgoročno prispeva k zmanjšanju negativnega vpliva evropskega kmetijstva na okolje, če jo spremlja okrepljena podpora za trajnostne prakse razvoja podeželja;
Believes that, in general, decoupling direct aid from agricultural production can in the long term contribute to reducing the negative environmental impact of EU agriculture, provided that it is accompanied by increased support for sustainable practices in rural development;
poudarja, da mora vsaka nadaljnja ločitev biti izpeljana po temeljitem razmisleku o možnih učinkih, med drugim tudi in ne samo o ravnovesju med različnimi kmetijskimi sektorji, o večji nevarnosti monokultur in o ogroženosti delovno intenzivnih kmetijskih sektorjev;
Points out, that any further decoupling should only take place after careful consideration of the potential effects including, but not limited to, the balance between the different agricultural sectors, the increased danger of monocultures, and the threat to labour-intensive agricultural sectors;
priznava, da stanje pri premijah na glavo živine, tudi pri mlečnih premijah, s tem ni primerljivo zaradi izkrivljanja razmer na trgu, ki ga med drugim povzročajo čedalje višje cene krme, ki imajo večji učinek na nekatere živinorejske sisteme v EU;
Recognises that the situation regarding headage-based premiums, including milk premiums, is not comparable, in view of serious market distortions caused, inter alia, by rising feed prices, which have a greater effect on certain livestock production systems practised in the EU;
meni, da bodo nekatere regije, na primer gorske in druge specifično zahtevne regije (otoki, suha in vlažna območja, oddaljene regije itd.), kjer reje živali, ki je razmeroma delovno intenzivna, ni mogoče nadomestiti, ob popolni ločitvi premij na glavo živine utrpele hudo družbeno, gospodarsko ali okoljsko škodo zaradi spremenjenih stroškov pridelave, kar pa ni v skladu s cilji Pogodbe; poziva, naj se kot osnova za dodelitev plačil, če pride do (delne) ločitve, uporabijo natančni referenčni podatki;
Considers that, in certain regions, such as mountain regions and other regions with specific difficulties (islands, dry or humid areas, outermost regions etc.), where there are no alternatives to relatively labour-intensive livestock farming, a complete decoupling of headage-based premiums may be accompanied by substantial social, economic and environmental drawbacks following changing input prices, which are incompatible with the goals of the Treaty; calls for accurate reference data to be used as a base for awarding payment entitlements in case (partial) decoupling takes place;
se zaveda ključnega pomena, ki jo ima reja živali za evropsko kmetijstvo, zlasti v nekaterih državah in regijah z obsežno živinorejo, in meni, da je zaenkrat smiselno delno ohraniti vezane premije na glavo živine; se zaveda pomembne vloge, ki jo imajo te zelo uspešne kmetije v regionalnem gospodarstvu; opozarja, da členi od 47 do 50 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 vsebujejo rešitev za območja intenzivne živinoreje, ki jo je treba preučiti tudi za obdobje o letu 2013;
Is aware of the key role played by livestock farming in European agriculture, especially in certain countries and regions with large-scale animal husbandry and, as a result, considers that it would be reasonable to partially maintain coupled animal premiums for the time being; recognises the important role these very successful farm holdings play in the regional economy; recalls that Articles 47 to 50 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 contain a solution for high livestock densities that should be further explored for the period after 2013;
meni pa, da to ne bo zadostovalo; zato pozdravlja napovedano spremembo člena 69 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 (v nadaljevanju "člen 69") kot prvi korak v pravo smer; vendar ugotavlja, da se ta instrument ne sme uporabljati kot prikrit način uvajanja prostovoljne modulacije in dvojne krepitve drugega stebra; poleg tega ta instrument ne sme povzročiti ponovne nacionalizacije skupne kmetijske politike, v čim večji meri pa je treba spoštovati enake pogoje za vse države članice;
Considers, however, that this in itself will not be enough; welcomes, therefore, as a first step in the right direction, the announced amendment of Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 (hereinafter referred to as 'Article 69'); notes, however, that this instrument should not be used as a disguised way of introducing voluntary modulation and a double strengthening of the second pillar; furthermore, this instrument should not lead to renationalisation of the CAP and the level playing field between Member States should be respected as much as possible;
terja, da se sredstva iz člena 69 prednostno uporabljajo za ukrepe ozemeljske celovitosti in krepitve posameznih sektorjev, zlasti ukrepe, ki preprečujejo opuščanje kmetijske proizvodnje, zlasti živinoreje v območjih, v katerih bi to škodljivo vplivalo na naravo, pokrajino ali regionalni razvoj (zlasti gorska območja, mokrišča ali sušna območja in druga zapostavljena območja ter odmaknjeni pašniki), ukrepe, ki služijo prestrukturiranju in krepitvi ključnih kmetijskih področij (npr. mlečni sektor, govedo in ovce), okoljske ukrepe na površino (npr. biološko kmetijstvo), ki zaenkrat še niso zajeti v drugem stebru, in obvladovanje tveganj;
Calls for appropriations under Article 69 to be allocated primarily for measures to promote territorial coherence and strengthen individual sectors, in particular measures to prevent agricultural production, and especially livestock farming, from being abandoned in areas where this would have highly detrimental effects on nature, the countryside or regional development (in particular mountain areas, wetlands or areas affected by water scarcity, other especially disadvantaged areas and grassland in extreme locations), measures designed to restructure and boost key agricultural sectors (e.g., the dairy and beef cattle and sheep sectors), and area-based environmental measures (e.g. organic farming) which to date have not been included in the second pillar and risk management;
meni, da bi lahko sredstva za revidirani člen 69 glede na rezultate presoje vplivov in na prostovoljni osnovi obsegala do 12 % neposrednih plačil na državo članico;
Considers that the budget for the revised Article 69 could, subject to the results of an impact assessment and on a voluntary basis, cover up to 12% of direct payments per Member State;
poziva Komisijo, naj poda predloge za skupna pravila v zvezi z uveljavljanjem člena 69 v državah članicah, da bi se čim bolj izognili trgovinskim oviram in izkrivljanju konkurence, ter naj se pravila, kjer je to potrebno, vključijo v skupno organizacijo trga; poziva tudi, da se o vseh ukrepih, za katere se uporabi člen 69, obvesti Komisijo; končno poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi analizo vpliva, ki mora biti priložena zakonodajnemu predlogu;
Calls on the Commission to submit proposals for common rules in respect of Member States' application of Article 69 in order to avoid barriers to trade and distortion of competition as far as possible, incorporating them, where necessary, within the common organisation of the market; calls also for all measures requiring the application of Article 69 to be notified to the Commission; calls, finally, on the Commission to draw up an impact analysis, which should be annexed to its legislative proposal;
meni, da je treba ukrepe, ki so namenjeni krepitvi posameznih sektorjev, načeloma financirati iz prvega stebra; zato tudi meni, da mora Komisija pri pripravi reforme po letu 2013 temeljito ovrednotiti rezultate uporabe revidiranega člena 69;
Considers that measures designed to strengthen individual sectors should in principle be funded under the first pillar in the long term; considers, therefore, that the Commission must carry out a thorough evaluation of the results of the implementation of the revised Article 69 in preparation for post-2013 reform;
Komisijo tudi poziva, naj do 30. junija 2010 predloži poročilo, v katerem bodo izčrpno predstavljene možnosti, kako v Evropi dolgoročno ohraniti poljedelstvo v Skupnosti in varnost preskrbe za živinorejo glede na različne proizvodne sisteme v EU, večfunkcionalnost in regionalne okoliščine (kot so gorska območja, območja z omejenimi možnostmi in otoki); v poročilu mora biti obravnavano tudi vprašanje, v kakšni meri se lahko učinkoviteje in usmerjeno uresničujejo cilji skupne kmetijske politike, med drugim tudi v povezavi s trajnostjo in socialnimi vidiki, z ločeno, posredno podporo, na primer s premijami za ekstenzivne travnike in pašnike ali posebno premijo za mleko in proizvodnjo mesa, s premijami za hleve, ki so zgrajeni in opremljeni v skladu z dobrim počutjem živali in okoljskimi standardi, ali s specifičnimi instrumenti za obvladovanje kriz; poudarja, da mora poročilo dati odgovor na vprašanje, ali in v kolikšni meri bodo, glede na specifične potrebe regij z intenzivno živinorejo, tudi po letu 2013 potrebne vezane premije na glavo živine ali rešitve v povezavi s členi od 47 do 50 Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003;
Calls on the Commission, in addition, to submit, by 30 June 2010, a report setting out comprehensively how Community production of arable products as well as security of supply for livestock farming in Europe can be safeguarded in the long term with regard to the different production systems within the EU, multi-functionality and regional aspects (such as mountain, disadvantaged and small island areas); considers that the report should also deal with the question of how far the aims of the CAP, including as they relate to sustainability and social aspects, can be achieved in a more efficient, targeted way by means of decoupled, indirect support, e.g. premiums for extensive grassland and pasture land, a special milk and meat production payment, premiums for stables which are constructed and furnished in line with common animal welfare and environmental standards, or specific instruments for crisis management; stresses that the report needs to answer the question of whether, or to what extent, in view of the specific needs of regions with intensive animal holdings, coupled animal premiums or solutions along the lines of those suggested in Articles 47 to 50 of Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 will still be needed after 2013;
priporoča, da morajo nove države članice, ki to želijo, imeti možnost do leta 2013 uporabljati poenostavljeno enotno plačilo na površino (SAPS), in poziva Komisijo, naj preveri, ali je mogoče uporabo tega plačila še poenostaviti s spremembo pravil za površine, za katere je mogoče uveljavljati podporo;
Recommends that those new Member States who so wish should be permitted to apply the Single Area Payment Scheme (SAPS) until 2013, and calls on the Commission to examine whether implementation of the SAPS could be further simplified by amending the rules on areas eligible for aid;
meni, da morajo biti vsa neizkoriščena ali shranjena proračunska sredstva, namenjena izvajanju skupne kmetijske politike, porabljena v okviru skupne kmetijske politike;
Believes that all budgetary appropriations earmarked for CAP implementation that are saved, or are not utilised, should be spent within the CAP;
meni, da bodo neposredna plačila potrebna tudi po letu 2013, da pa bi morala temeljiti na novih objektivnih merilih, zlasti na neposrednem zaposlovanju na kmetijah, ali bi se morala močneje razvijati v smer nagrajevanja kmetov za upravljanje zemlje ali v smer nadomestil za določene učinkovite storitve splošnega interesa ali za posebne standarde, ki vključujejo standarde za zaščito živali, in da je treba pri tem preveriti tudi smiselnost velikih razlik med regionalnimi plačili na površino v Evropi ter različno financiranje drugega stebra; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ustrezne ukrepe, ki bodo zagotovili, da bodo polno stopnjo neposrednih plačil prejemale samo osebe ali podjetja, ki se dejansko ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom;
Considers that direct payments will also be required after 2013, but that these need to be based on new objective criteria, notably on direct employment generated by farms, or developed more clearly in the direction of a reward for farmers for land stewardship or compensation for certain effective services of general interest or for specific standards, including animal welfare standards, and that the extent to which the significant differences between regional area payments within Europe and the different funding for the second pillar are appropriate, should be examined; calls on the Commission to propose suitable measures designed to ensure that the full rate of direct payments is received only by persons and undertakings which are actually involved in agriculture;
Poenostavitev, upoštevanje drugih obveznosti (navzkrižne skladnosti) in tržna usmeritev
Simplification, cross-compliance and market orientation
podpira po ustreznem obdobju opuščanja postopno vključitev manjših in zato težje upravljivih plačilnih sistemov na podlagi proizvodnje (suhe krme, konoplje, lanu, krompirjevega škroba) v sistem enotne premije na površino, razen če bi to povzročilo resno družbeno, ekonomsko ali okoljsko škodo v posameznih regijah; kjer je to potrebno zaradi regionalne politike, morajo biti na voljo spremljevalni ukrepi v skladu s členom 69; poziva Komisijo, naj za vsak posamezen primer pripravi analizo ekonomskega in regionalnega vpliva, ki bo pokazala, da gre za primerno rešitev, in opredelila potreben časovni okvir izvajanja; poudarja, da ločitev ne sme ogroziti obstoja zadevnih oblik proizvodnje;
Supports, after an appropriate phasing-out period, the gradual integration of production-based payment schemes which are smaller and therefore very cumbersome to administer (dried fodder, hemp, flax, potato starch) into the single area payment scheme, unless this were to result in considerable social, economic or environmental drawbacks in particular regions; if necessary, for reasons of regional policy, accompanying measures should be provided for in accordance with Article 69; calls on the Commission to carry out a case-by case analysis of its economic and regional impact, which demonstrates that this is the appropriate solution and identifies the necessary timeframe for its implementation; stresses that decoupling should not jeopardise the very existence of the forms of production concerned;
podpira takojšnjo ukinitev obveznosti prahe, ki je v sistemu ločenih neposrednih plačil izgubila pomen kot instrument za nadzorovanje količine in jo je poleg tega tudi zelo zahtevno upravljati, ter preoblikovanje pravic prahe v običajne pravice;
Supports the immediate abolition of the set-aside obligation, a volume control instrument which has lost its significance in a decoupled direct payment system and is extremely cumbersome to administer, and the conversion of set-aside entitlements into normal entitlements;
meni, da v zvezi z zmanjšanjem površin prahe zaradi povečanega povpraševanja po kmetijskih proizvodih lahko države članice z ukrepi iz drugega stebra ter s spremembo opredelitve vzdrževanja dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev prek spodbujanja razvoja biotske raznovrstnosti živali in njihovega življenjskega prostora bolje in bolj neposredno dosežejo vse prednosti za okolje, ki jih omogoča praha, kot je na primer opraševanje kulturnih rastlin s čebelami;
Considers that, against the background of a reduction in the areas under set-aside following the increase in demand for agricultural products, any environmental advantages procured through set-aside, such as crop pollination by bees, can be better and more directly obtained by Member States through measures under the second pillar and by altering the definition of the maintenance of good agricultural and environmental conditions (GAEC) to facilitate development of the biodiversity of wildlife and its habitats;
poziva k postopni odpravi premije za energetske rastline v obdobju postopnega opuščanja, ker je njihova obravnava zelo zamudna, v sedanjem tržnem okolju pa imajo malo ali nobene prednosti za energetsko politiko;
Calls for the gradual abolition of the energy crop premium in the course of a phasing-out period, because energy crop premiums are very cumbersome to administer and have little or no energy policy advantages in the current market environment;
poziva, naj se sredstva, ki niso bila uporabljena kot posledica odprave podpore za energetske rastline, med drugim ciljno uporabijo za spremljevalne ukrepe v okviru organizacije trga mleka, zlasti za hribovita in posebno težavna območja;
Calls for the appropriations which have not been used as a result of abolishing the energy crop premium to be made available, inter alia, specifically for accompanying measures in connection with the organisation of the milk market, especially in mountain areas and other areas with specific difficulties;
poziva Komisijo, naj neporabljena sredstva iz proračuna za kmetijstvo, namenjena za izvajanje ukrepov na trgu, kot so intervencije, izvozne subvencije ali skladiščenje predvsem prek člena 69, nameni krepitvi gospodarstva na podeželju, natančneje kmetijskih gospodarstev in tako prispeva k ciljem razvoja podeželja;
Calls on the Commission to make available unused appropriations under the agriculture budget which were earmarked for market management measures such as intervention, export subsidies or storage, primarily on the basis of Article 69 for strengthening the economy in rural areas, in particular agricultural holdings, in keeping with rural development objectives;
meni, da neposrednih plačil ni več možno utemeljiti brez navzkrižne skladnosti; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da mora EU novim državam članicam v prehodnem obdobju pomagati pri izvajanju pravil navzkrižne skladnosti;
Considers that direct payments without cross-compliance (CC) can no longer be justified; emphasises in that respect that the new Member States must be assisted by the EU in the application of the CC rules in the course of a transitional period;
zaradi zniževanja neposrednih plačil zavrača širitev področja uporabe navzkrižne skladnosti, dokler države članice in Komisija ne bodo dosegle vidnega napredka pri poenostavitvi in uskladitvi pravil o nadzoru ter Komisija ne bo predložila pregleda stroškov za kmete v zvezi z navzkrižno skladnostjo; v zvezi s tem se sklicuje na svoje stališče z dne 11. decembra 2007;
Rejects any widening of the scope of CC, in view of reductions in direct payments, as long as Member States and the Commission fail to make substantial progress in simplifying and harmonising monitoring rules and the Commission does not present an overview of the costs connected with CC to farmers; refers in this context to its position of 11 December 2007;
meni, da bi se navzkrižna skladnost morala omejiti na preverjanje temeljnih standardov evropskega modela proizvodnje in na standarde, ki so dostopni za sistematične in usklajene preglede v različnih državah članicah;
Considers that CC should be restricted to checks on essential standards of the European model of production and standards to which systematic and harmonised checks in the different Member States can be applied;
poziva k večji učinkovitosti pri doseganju ciljev in enotnejšemu izvajanju navzkrižne skladnosti v državah članicah; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi jasnejše smernice za pomoč državam članicam pri izvajanju;
Calls for greater effectiveness of CC in relation to its objectives and a more homogeneous implementation across the Member States; calls on the Commission to develop clearer guidelines to assist the Member States in implementation;
poziva, da se pretirane obremenitve za živinorejo zaradi navzkrižne skladnosti prenehajo; zlasti poziva h kritični obravnavi posameznih higienskih in označevalnih standardov (npr. ušesne znamke);
Calls for an end to disproportionate burdens placed on livestock farming by CC; calls, in particular, for a critical examination of certain hygiene and identification standards (e.g. ear tags);
si lahko predstavlja zmerno prilagoditev zahtev po ohranitvi dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev ter trajnostnega upravljanja s kmetijskim površinami glede na spremenjene okoljske in proizvodne pogoje (sprememba podnebja, biomasa), če se zagotovi, da se nove zahteve v vsej Evropi izvajajo na podoben način;
Could envisage a modest adaptation of the requirements to maintain GAEC and sustainable land management with regard to altered environmental and production conditions (climate change, biomass), if the introduction of the new requirements in a comparable way throughout Europe were guaranteed;
meni, da bi države članice, ki izvajajo shemo enotnega plačila na površino, morale imeti možnost postopnega izvajanja načel navzkrižne skladnosti, da bi se lahko ustrezno pripravile za uvedbo potrebnih sistemov nadzora in da bi prepričale kmete, naj se prilagodijo uvedenim standardom;
Considers that Member States applying the SAPS should be entitled to implement the CC principle progressively, in order to be able to properly prepare for the introduction of the necessary control systems and convince farmers of the need to meet the appointed standards;