natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(22) Nekatere nepremičnine, podjetja in druge posebne kategorije premoženja so zaradi svojega gospodarskega, družinskega ali družbenega pomena predmet posebne ureditve ▌v državi članici, v kateri se nahajajo , ter za njih veljajo določene omejitve, ki zadevajo dedovanje tega premoženja ali nanj vplivajo .
(22) For economic, family or social considerations , certain immovable property, certain enterprises and other special categories of assets are subject to special rules in the Member State in which they are located setting restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of those assets .
Ta uredba bi morala zagotoviti uporabo teh posebnih pravil .
This Regulation should ensure the application of such special rules .
Vendar je treba to izjemo od uporabe prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, razlagati strogo, da ne bi bila v nasprotju s splošnim ciljem te uredbe.
However, this exception to the application of the law applicable to the succession requires a strict interpretation in order to remain compatible with the general objective of this Regulation.
Zato niti kolizijska pravila , v skladu s katerimi za nepremičnine velja drugačno pravo kot za premičnine, niti določbe o nujnem deležu zapuščine , ki določajo drugačen delež, kot ga določa pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje v skladu s to uredbo, ne veljajo za posebna pravila o omejitvah, ki zadevajo dedovanje določenega premoženja ali nanj vplivajo .
Therefore, neither conflict of laws rules subjecting immovable property to a law different from that applicable to movable property nor provisions providing for a reserved share of the estate greater than that provided for in the law applicable to the succession under this Regulation may be considered as special rules setting restrictions concerning or affecting the succession in respect of certain assets .
(23) Da bi zagotovili enotno obravnavo primerov, ko umreta dve ali več oseb , katerih dedovanje bi urejali različni pravni sistemi, pa ni gotov vrstni red smrti teh oseb , bi moralo biti v tej uredbi določeno , da nobeden od teh zapustnikov nima dednih pravic po drugem ali drugih .
(23) To ensure a uniform handling of a situation in which it is uncertain in what order two or more persons whose succession would be governed by different laws died, this Regulation should provide for a rule laying down that none of the deceased persons should have any rights in the succession of the other or the others .
(23a) V določenih okoliščinah se lahko zgodi, da je zapuščina brez dediča.
(23a) In some situations an estate may be left without a claimant.
V različnih pravnih sistemih so ti primeri različno urejeni.
Different laws provide differently for such situations.
Po nekaterih pravih ima država na primer pravico do dedovanja, ne glede na to, kje se premoženje nahaja.
Under some laws, for instance, the State will be able to claim the vacant estate as an heir irrespective of where the assets are located.
Po nekaterih drugih pravih pa si lahko država prisvoji samo premoženje, ki je na njenem ozemlju.
Under some other laws the State will be able to appropriate only the assets located on its territory.
V tej uredbi bi bilo zato treba določiti, da uporaba prava, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ne bi smela preprečevati državi članici, da si po svojem pravu prisvoji premoženje, ki je na njenem ozemlju.
This Regulation should therefore provide for a rule laying down that the application of the law applicable to the succession should not preclude that a Member State may appropriate under its own law the assets located on its territory.
Da bi zagotovili, da s tem pravilom ne bo oškodovani upniki, ki imajo terjatve do zapuščine, bi bilo treba dodati določbo o tem, da lahko upniki, ki imajo terjatve do zapuščine, zahtevajo, da se te pobotajo s celotnim zapuščinskim premoženjem, ne glede na to, kje se nahaja.
However, to ensure that this rule is not detrimental to the creditors of the estate, a proviso should be added under which the creditors of the estate should be able to seek satisfaction of their claims out of all the assets of the estate, irrespective of their location.
(23b) Uporaba kolizijskih pravil iz te uredbe lahko pomeni, da se bo uporabilo pravo tretje države.
(23b) The conflict of laws rules laid down in this Regulation may lead to the application of the law of a third State.
V takšnem primeru bi bilo treba upoštevati pravila mednarodnega zasebnega prava te države.
In such cases regard should be had to the private international law rules of that State.
Če je v teh pravilih določeno odkazovanje na pravo države članice ali pravo tretje države, ki bi za dedovanje uporabila svoje pravo, bi bilo treba zaradi mednarodne skladnosti takšno odkazovanjee sprejeti.
If those rules provide for either the renvoi to the law of a Member State or to the law of a third State which would apply its own law to the succession such renvoi should be accepted in order to ensure international consistency.
Odkazovanje pa bi moralo biti izključeno, če je zapustnik za dedovanje izbral pravo tretje države.
Renvoi should however be excluded in situations where the deceased had made a choice of law in favour of the law of a third State.
(24) Zaradi javnega interesa bi morala imeti sodišča in drugi pristojni organi, ki obravnavajo dedne zadeve v državah članicah, v izjemnih okoliščinah možnost neupoštevanja nekaterih določb tujega prava, kadar bi bila njegova uporaba v določenem primeru očitno nezdružljiva z javnim redom zadevne države članice .
(24) Considerations of public interest should allow courts and other competent authorities dealing with matters of succession in the Member States to disregard , in exceptional circumstances, certain provisions of a foreign law ▌where , in a given case, applying such provisions would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the Member State concerned .
Vendar sodišča ali drugi pristojni organi ne bi smela imeti možnosti uporabe izjeme javnega reda, da bi zavrnila pravo druge države članice ali priznanje ali mogoče izvršitev izdane sodne odločbe, javne listine, sodne poravnave, izdanih v drugi državi članici, kadar bi bilo to v nasprotju z Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti s členom 21 Listine, ki prepoveduje vsakršno diskriminacijo.
However, the courts or other competent authorities should not be able to apply the public-policy exception in order to set aside the law of another State or to refuse to recognise , or, as the case may be, accept, or enforce a decision, an authentic instrument, or a court settlementfrom another Member State when doing so would be contrary to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 21, which prohibits all forms of discrimination.
(25) Glede na splošni cilj te uredbe, ki je vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb, izdanih v državah članicah v zapuščinskih zadevah ▌ ne glede na to, ali so bile takšne sodne odločbe izdane v pravdnem ali nepravdnem postopku , bi bilo treba v tej uredbi določiti pravila o priznavanju, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju sodnih odločb, podobnih tistim iz drugih instrumentov Unije s področja pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah .
(25) In the light of its general objective, which is the mutual recognition of decisions given in the Member States in matters of succession ▌, irrespective of whether such decisions were given in contentious or non-contentious proceedings , this Regulation should lay down rules relating to the recognition, enforceability and enforcement of decisions similar to those of other Union instruments in the area of judicial cooperation in civil matters .
(26) Da bi upoštevali različne sisteme za obravnavo dednih zadev v državah članicah, bi bilo treba s to uredbo zagotoviti sprejemljivost in izvršljivost javnih listin, izdanih v dednih zadevah, v vseh državah članicah.
(26) In order to take into account the different systems for dealing with matters of succession in the Member States, this Regulation should guarantee the acceptance and enforceability in all Member States of authentic instruments in a matter of succession .
(26a) Javne listine bi morale imeti v drugi državi članici enako dokazno moč kot v državi članici izvora ali najbolj primerljive učinke.
(26a) Authentic instruments should have the same evidentiary effects in another Member State as they have in the Member State of origin or the most comparable effects.
Pri določanju dokazne moči neke javne listine v drugi državi članici ali njenih najbolj primerljivih učinkov bi bilo treba upoštevati vrsto in obseg dokazne moči javne listine v državi članici izvora.
When determining the evidentiary effects of a given authentic instrument in another Member State or the most comparable effects, reference should be made to the nature and the scope of the evidentiary effects of the authentic instrument in the Member State of origin.
Zato bo dokazna moč javne listine v drugi državi članici odvisna od prava države članice izvora.
It will therefore depend on the law of the Member State of origin which evidentiary effects a given authentic instrument should have in another Member State .
(26b) Verodostojnost javne listine bi morala biti avtonomen pojem, ki naj zadeva vprašanja, kot so pristnost listine, obličnostne zahteve za listino, pooblastila organa, ki sestavi listino, in postopek, po katerem se listina sestavi.
(26b) The "authenticity" of an authentic instrument should be an autonomous concept which should cover elements such as the genuineness of the instrument, the formal prerequisites of the instrument, the powers of the authority drawing up the instrument and the procedure under which the instrument is drawn up.
Vključevati bi moral tudi dejstva, ki jih v javno listino zapiše zadevni organ, kot je dejstvo, da sta se navedeni stranki določenega dne sestali v prisotnosti tega organa in dali navedene izjave.
It should also cover the factual elements recorded in the authentic instrument by the authority concerned, such as the fact that the indicated parties appeared before that authority on the indicated date and that they made the indicated declarations.
Stranka, ki želi izpodbijati verodostojnost javne listine, bi morala to storiti na pristojnem sodišču države članice, iz katere izvira javna listina, po pravu te države članice.
A party who wishes to challenge the authenticity of an authentic instrument should do so before the competent court in the Member State of origin of the authentic instrument under the law of that Member State .
(26c) Pojme "pravni posli ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini" bi bilo treba razlagati kot sklicevanje na materialno vsebino javne listine.
(26c) The terms "the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument" should be interpreted as a reference to the contents as to substance recorded in the authentic instrument.
Pravni posli, zapisani v javni listini, bi bili lahko na primer pogodba med strankama o delitvi zapuščine, oporoka ali dednopravna pogodba oziroma druga izjava volje.
The legal acts recorded in an authentic instrument could be for instance the agreement between the parties on the sharing-out or the distribution of the estate, or it could be a will or an agreement as to succession, or another declaration of intent.
Pravna razmerja bi bila lahko na primer določitev dedičev in drugih upravičencev, določenih po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ter določitev njihovih deležev, obstoj nujnega deleža ali drugi elementi po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
The legal relationships could be for instance the determination of the heirs and other beneficiaries as established under the law applicable to the succession, their respective shares and the existence of a reserved share, or any other element established under the law applicable to the succession.
Stranka, ki želi izpodbijati pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisana v javni listini, bi morala to storiti na sodiščih, pristojnih po tej uredbi, ki bi morala o tem odločati po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje.
A party who wishes to challenge the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument should do so before the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation, which should decide on the challenge in accordance with the law applicable to the succession.
(26d) Če je vprašanje, ki zadeva pravne posle ali pravna razmerja, zapisane v javni listini, obravnavano kot predhodno vprašanje na sodišču države članice, bi moralo biti za odločanje o tem vprašanju pristojno to sodišče.
(26d) If a question relating to the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in an authentic instrument is raised as an incidental question in proceedings before a court of a Member State , that court should have jurisdiction over that question.
(26e) Izpodbijana javna listina ne bi smela imeti nobene dokazne moči v državi članici, ki ni država članica izvora, dokler postopek izpodbijanja ni končan.
(26e) An authentic instrument being challenged should not produce any evidentiary effects in a Member State other than the Member State of origin as long as the challenge is pending.
Če se izpodbija samo določena zadeva v zvezi s pravnimi posli ali pravnimi razmerji, zapisanimi v javni listini, izpodbijana javna listina v državi članici, ki ni država članica izvora, ne bi smela imeti nobene dokazne moči glede izpodbijane zadeve, dokler postopek izpodbijanja ni končan.
If the challenge only concerns a specific matter relating to the legal acts or legal relationships recorded in the authentic instrument, the challenged authentic instrument should have no evidentiary effects in a Member State other than the Member State of origin with regard to the matter being challenged as long as the challenge is pending.
Javna listina, ki je zaradi izpodbijanja razglašena za neveljavno, ne bi smela imeti nobene dokazne moči več.
An authentic instrument which has been declared invalid as a result of a challenge should cease to produce any evidentiary effects.
(26f) Organ, ki bi na podlagi uporabe te uredbe prejel neskladni javni listini, bi moral oceniti, katera od obeh, če sploh katera, naj ima prednost glede na okoliščine posamezne zadeve.
(26f) An authority which, in the context of the application of this Regulation, would be presented with two incompatible authentic instruments should assess the question as to which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority taking into account the circumstances of the particular case.
Če iz teh okoliščin ni razvidno, katera od obeh javnih listin, če sploh katera, bi morala imeti prednost, bi morala o tem odločiti sodišča, ki so pristojna v skladu s to uredbo, ali – če se to vprašanje postavi kot predhodno vprašanje v postopku, sodišče, pred katerim teče ta postopek.
Where, from those circumstances, it is not clear which authentic instrument, if any, should be given priority, the question should be determined by the courts having jurisdiction under this Regulation, or, where the question is raised as an incidental question in the course of proceedings, by the court seised of those proceedings.
Če sta neskladni javna listina in sodna odločba, bi bilo treba upoštevati razloge za nepriznanje iz te uredbe.
In the event of an incompatibility between an authentic instrument and a decision, regard should be had to the grounds of non-recognition of decisions under this Regulation.
(27) Za vzpostavitev hitre, poceni in učinkovite ureditve dedovanja s čezmejnimi posledicami v Evropski uniji bi moral imeti dedič, volilojemnik, izvršitelj oporoke ali upravitelj zapuščine možnost, da na zlahka dokaže svoj status in/ali uveljavlja svoje pravice in pooblastila v drugi državi članici , na primer v državi članici , v kateri je zapuščina.
(27) A speedy, easy and efficient settlement of a succession with cross-border implications within the Union implies that the heirs, legatees, executors of the will or administrators of the estate should be able to demonstrate easily their status and/or rights and powers in another Member State , for instance in a Member State in which succession property is located .
V ta namen bi morala ta uredba določati uvedbo enotnega potrdila, tj. evropskega potrdila o dedovanju (v nadaljnjem besedilu: potrdilo), ki se izda za uporabo v drugi državi članici.
To enable them to do so this Regulation should provide for the creation of a uniform certificate, the European Certificate of Succession (hereinafter referred to as "the Certificate") to be issued for use in another Member State .
To potrdilo zaradi upoštevanja načela subsidiarnosti ne bi smelo nadomestiti nacionalnih dokumentov, ki se lahko za enak namen izdajajo v državah članicah ▌.
In order to respect the principle of subsidiarity, the Certificate should not substitute internal documents which may exist for similar purposes in the Member States ▌.
(27a) Organ, ki izda potrdilo, bi moral upoštevati obličnosti, ki so potrebne za registracijo nepremičnine v državi članici, kjer je register.
(27a) The authority which issues the Certificate should have regard to the formalities required for the registration of immoveable property in the Member State in which the register is kept.
Ta uredba mora zato določiti izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami o teh obličnostih.
For that purpose, this Regulation should provide for an exchange of information on such formalities between the Member States.
(27b) Uporaba potrdila ne bi smela biti obvezna.
(27 b ) The use of the Certificate should not be mandatory.
To pomeni, da osebam, ki lahko zaprosijo za potrdilo, tega ni treba storiti, temveč lahko uporabijo druge instrumente, ki so na voljo v skladu s to uredbo (sodne odločbe, javne listine ali sodne poravnave).
This means that the persons entitled to apply for a Certificate should be under no obligation to do so but should be free to use the other instruments available under this Regulation (decisions, authentic instruments and court settlements).
Vendar pa noben organ ali oseba, ki se mu/ji predloži potrdilo, izdano v drugi državi članici, ne bi smela zahtevati, da se mu/ji namesto potrdila predloži sodna odločba, javna listina ali sodna poravnava.
However, n o authority or person presented with a Certificate issued in another Member State should be entitled to request that a decision, authentic instrument or court settlement be presented instead of the Certificate.
(27c) Potrdilo bi morala izdati država članica, katere sodišča so pristojna v skladu s to uredbo.
(27 c ) The Certificate should be issued in the Member State whose courts have jurisdiction under this Regulation.
Države članice bi morale v nacionalni zakonodaji določiti, kateri organi bodo pristojni za izdajo potrdila, tj. bodisi sodišča, kot so opredeljena v tej uredbi, bodisi drugi organi, ki so pristojni za dedne zadeve, kot so na primer notarji.
It should be for each Member State to determine in its internal legislation which authorities should have competence to issue the Certificate, whether courts as defined for the purposes of this Regulation, or other authorities with competence in matters of succession, such as for instance notaries.
Države članice bi morale v nacionalni zakonodaji določiti tudi, ali lahko organ, ki izda potrdilo, pri izdaji sodeluje z drugimi pristojnimi organi, na primer organi, ki so pristojni za sprejemanje zapriseženih izjav.
It should also be for each Member State to determine in its internal legislation whether the issuing authority may involve other competent bodies in the issuing process, for instance bodies competent to receive statutory declarations in lieu of an oath.
Komisiji bi morale sporočiti ustrezne informacije o svojih organih, pristojnih za izdajo potrdil, da bi se lahko objavile.
The Member States should communicate to the Commission the relevant information concerning their issuing authorities in order for that information to be made publicly available.
(27d) Potrdilo bi moralo imeti enake učinke v vseh državah članicah.
(27 d ) The Certificate should produce the same effects in all Member States.
Samo po sebi ne bi smelo biti izvršilni naslov, imeti pa bi moralo dokazno moč, poleg tega bi se moralo zanj predpostavljati, da točno odraža elemente, ki so bili ugotovljeni po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, ali po katerem koli drugem pravu, ki se uporablja za posamezne elemente, kot je materialna veljavnost razpolaganja za primer smrti.
It should not be an enforceable title in its own right but should have an evidentiary effect and should be presumed to demonstrate accurately elements which have been established under the law applicable to the succession or under any other law applicable to specific elements, such as the substantive validity of dispositions of property upon death.
Dokazni učinek potrdila ne bi smel vključevati elementov, ki ne spadajo na področje uporabe te uredbe, kot je na primer očetovstvo ali vprašanje, če je določeno premoženje pripadalo ali ne pokojniku.
The evidentiary effect of the Certificate should not extend to elements which are not governed by this Regulation, such as, for instance, the question of affiliation or the question whether or not a particular asset belonged to the deceased.
Vsakomur, ki izroči plačilo ali preda zapuščinsko premoženje osebi, ki je v potrdilu navedena kot upravičena, da prejme takšno plačilo ali premoženje kot dedič ali volilojemnik, bi bilo treba zagotoviti ustrezno zaščito, če je ravnal v dobri veri in se pri tem zanašal na to, da so informacije, navedene v potrdilu, točne.
Any person who makes payments or hands over succession property to a person indicated in the Certificate as being entitled to accept such payment or property as heir or legatee should be granted appropriate protection if he acted in good faith relying on the accuracy of the information certified in the Certificate.
Enako zaščito bi bilo treba zagotoviti vsakomur, ki se zanaša na to, da so informacije, navedene v potrdilu, točne, in ki kupi ali prejme premoženje od osebe, ki je v potrdilu navedena kot upravičena, da razpolaga s tem premoženjem.
The same protection should be granted to any person who, relying on the accuracy of the information certified in the Certificate, buys or receives succession property from a person indicated in the Certificate as being entitled to dispose of such property.
Če so predložene overjene kopije, bi bilo treba zagotoviti zaščito.
The protection should be ensured if still valid certified copies are presented.
Ta uredba ne bi smela urejati vprašanja, ali je takšna pridobitev premoženja veljavna ali ne.
Whether or not such an acquisition of property by a third person is effective should not be determined by this Regulation.
(27e) Pristojni organ bi moral izdati potrdilo na zahtevo.
(27 e ) The competent authority should issue the Certificate upon request.
Organ, ki ga je izdal, bi moral izvirnik potrdila obdržati, prosilcu zahtevka in vsem drugim osebam, ki izkažejo upravičeni interes, pa izdati eno ali več overjenih kopij.
The original of the Certificate should remain with the issuing authority which should issue one or more certified copies of the Certificate to the applicant and to any other person demonstrating a legitimate interest.
To ne bi smelo preprečevati državam članicam, da v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov dovolijo, da se kopije potrdila razkrijejo javnosti.
This should not preclude that a Member State , in accordance with its national rules on public access to documents, may allow copies of the Certificate to be disclosed to members of the public.
Ta uredba bi morala omogočati pritožbe zoper odločitve organa izdajatelja, vključno zoper odločitev o zavrnitvi izdaje potrdila.
This Regulation should provide for redress against decisions of the issuing authority, including decisions to refuse the issue of a Certificate.
Če je bilo potrdilo popravljeno, spremenjeno ali preklicano, bi moral organ izdajatelj s tem seznaniti osebo, ki so ji bile izdane kopije, da bi se preprečila njihova nepravilna uporaba.
When the Certificate is rectified, modified or withdrawn, the issuing authority should inform the persons to whom certified copies have been issued so as to avoid wrongful use of such copies .