natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2007 o tematski strategiji o trajnostni rabi naravnih virov UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Thematic Strategy for the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2006 o tematski strategiji za urbano okolje UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2006 on the thematic strategy on the urban environment OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. novembra 2007 o tematski strategiji za varstvo tal Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0504 .
having regard to its resolution of 13 November 2007 on the thematic strategy for soil protection Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0504 .
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 14. novembra 2007 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za varstvo tal in spremembi Direktive 2004/35/ES Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0509 .
having regard to its position of 14 November 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0509 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2006 o tematski strategiji o onesnaževanju zraka UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2006 on the thematic strategy on air pollution OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 26. septembra 2006 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kakovosti zunanjega zraka in čistejšem zraku za Evropo UL C 306 E, 15.12.2006, str.
having regard to its position of 26 September 2006 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. februarja 2007 o tematski strategiji o recikliranju odpadkov UL C 287 E, 29.11.2007, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 February 2007 on a thematic strategy on the recycling of waste OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 13. februarja 2007 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odpadkih UL C 287 E, 29.11.2007, str.
having regard to its position of 13 February 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti za doseganje trajnostne rabe pesticidov Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0444 .
having regard to its position of 23 October 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action to achieve a sustainable use of pesticides Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0444 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. oktobra 2007 o tematski strategiji o trajnostni rabi pesticidov Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0467 .
having regard to its resolution of 24 October 2007 on a Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Pesticides Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0467 .
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0445 .
having regard to its position of 23 October 2007 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0445 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino, Odbora za regionalni razvoj in Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0074/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0074/2008 ),
ker Evropa še vedno ni na poti k resnično trajnostnem razvoju,
whereas Europe is not yet on the path towards genuinely sustainable development,
ker Komisija priznava, da ni bilo velikega napredka glede temeljnih vprašanj vključevanja okoljskih zadev v druga področja politike in izboljšav pri izvrševanju zakonodaje Skupnosti,
whereas the Commission recognises that there has been only limited progress on the fundamental issues of integrating environmental concerns into other policy areas and improving the enforcement of Community legislation,
ker Komisija poudarja, da pritisk na okolje na mnogih področjih dejansko narašča: povečujejo se globalne emisije toplogrednih plinov, pospešeno izginja biološka raznovrstnost, onesnaževanje ima še vedno velik vpliv na javno zdravje, še naprej se povečuje količina odpadkov, proizvedenih v EU, povečujejo pa se tudi posledice našega vpliva na okolje; ker se zaradi tega dejansko postavlja vprašanje, ali nimajo druge pomembnejše politike EU nasprotnega učinka na okolje,
whereas the Commission points to the fact that many environmental pressures are actually increasing: global emissions of greenhouse gases are rising, the loss of biodiversity is accelerating, pollution still has a major effect on public health, the amount of waste produced within the EU continues to increase, and our ecological footprint is steadily growing; whereas this raises serious questions about the environmentally counterproductive effects of other major EU policies,
ker je malo verjetno, da je mogoče doseči trajnostni razvoj brez vključitve okoljskih vprašanj na vsa pomembnejša področja politike,
whereas it is unlikely that sustainable development will ever be achieved as long as environmental concerns are not fully integrated into all major policy areas,
ker je čisto in zdravo okolje bistveno za dobro počutje ljudi ter dobre socialne razmere,
whereas a clean and healthy environment is essential for human well-being and good social conditions,
ugotavlja, da so predzakonodajni postopki zaradi uporabe tematske strategije kot novega postopkovnega orodja postali pomembnejši, ustvarile pa so se tudi dodatne priložnosti za sodelovanje interesnih skupin in bolj strateški pristop k zakonodajni politiki EU; vendar obžaluje, da je zaradi tematskih strategij daljši tudi postopek oblikovanja okoljske politike, saj nastajajo zamude pri pripravi dejanskih predlogov v zvezi s politiko in sprejetju ukrepov na podlagi te politike;
Notes that the use of thematic strategies as a new procedural tool has increased the importance of the pre-legislative processes and created additional opportunities for stakeholder involvement and a more strategic approach to EU legislative policy; however, regrets that thematic strategies have also lengthened the duration of the environmental policy-making process by delaying the formulation of concrete policy proposals and the adoption of resulting measures;
meni, da bi bilo treba okoljsko politiko zaradi pomena, ki ga ima za industrijo, in ker jo v glavnem izvajajo lokalni organi, upoštevati pri oblikovanju zakonodaje, stališča industrije, malih podjetij in lokalnih organov pa predstaviti posvetovalnim organom, ki bi jih morali upoštevati;
Considers, in view of the importance of environmental policy to industry and the fact that it is, in general, implemented by local authorities, that it should be taken into account when legislation is drafted and that the views of industry, small business and local authorities should be represented in and listened to by the relevant consultative bodies;
meni, da je bistveno okrepiti stališče iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa kot okoljske razsežnosti strategije EU za trajnostni razvoj;
Considers it essential to strengthen the position of the Sixth EAP as the environmental dimension of the EU's sustainable development strategy;
meni, da morajo biti pristojnosti v Evropski uniji jasno dodeljene in opredeljene ter poudarja, da se v vmesnem pregledu Komisije kažejo zmeda in notranje nejasnosti glede pristojnosti Komisije in držav članic; poudarja, da je treba jasno določiti in opredeliti ter razmejiti pristojnosti in posebne odgovornosti vsake strani, da se zagotovi spoštovanje teh pristojnosti tudi v prihodnosti;
Believes that, within the EU, competences must be clearly allocated and defined and points out that the Commission's mid-term review shows confusion and internal ambiguity with regard to the competences of the Commission and of the Member States; points out that both the limits of their respective competences and their specific responsibilities must be clearly established and set down in order to ensure that those responsibilities continue to be met;
poudarja, da tematske strategije niso uporabne, če časovno sovpadajo z obsežno zakonodajno dokumentacijo, ampak so koristne pred nastankom ustreznega zakonodajnega dokumenta ali če se pojavijo samostojno;
Points out that thematic strategies are not useful if they coincide in timing with large legislative dossiers, they are useful either before the appearance of the relevant legislative document or on their own;
poudarja, da obstaja neposredna medsebojna zveza med stanjem človekovega okolja in zdravjem ljudi; poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi izvajanja pristopa zdravja v vseh politikah izdela študije, ki bodo prikazovale vzročni odnos med spremembo v kakovosti okolja in spremembo v zdravstvenemu stanju ljudi;
Stresses the direct connection between the state of the human environment and human health; calls on the Commission, with the aim of implementing the 'health in all policies' approach, to draft studies indicating the causal relationship between change in the quality of the environment and change in the state of people's health;
meni, da je EU za uresničitev ciljev diplomatskega reševanja problemov zaradi podnebnih sprememb iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa ravnala dosledno; vendar opozarja, da EU v zvezi s cilji in prednostnimi ukrepi za zaustavitev podnebnih sprememb ni uspela izpolniti vseh obveznosti; je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi večjih emisij v prometu in počasnih učinkov ukrepov, ki se uporabljajo pri poskusu izboljšanja energetske učinkovitosti; poziva Komisijo, naj objavi sporočilo o okoljskih ciljih za trajnostni prevozni sistem, izraženih s številkami; pričakuje, da bodo države članice do leta 2012 uresničile cilje iz kjotskega protokola za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov za posamezne države;
Considers that the EU has acted consistently to attain the climate diplomacy objectives set in the Sixth EAP; recalls, however, that, as far as the objectives and priority actions to halt climate change are concerned, the EU has not succeeded in fulfilling all the commitments; is extremely concerned about the increase in transport emissions and the slow effect of the measures which have been used in an attempt to improve energy efficiency; reminds the Commission to publish a communication on quantified environmental objectives for a sustainable transport system; expects Member States to attain the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for individual countries laid down in the Kyoto Protocol by 2012;
obžaluje dejstvo, da cilj zaustavitve upadanja biološke raznovrstnosti verjetno ne bo uresničen do leta 2010 ter da se dejanski okoljski rezultati na podlagi predlagane strategije za varstvo morskega okolja in tal ne bodo dosegli do leta 2012; ugotavlja, da si je treba bolj prizadevati za pomoč pri vključevanju politike o biološki raznovrstnosti v druga področja politike; opozarja na potrebo po ustreznem financiranju programa Natura 2000 in drugih prednostnih ciljev, ki so tesno povezani s programom;
Deplores the fact that the objective of halting the decline of biodiversity by 2010 will probably not be attained and that the proposed strategies for protecting the marine environment and soil will not produce concrete environmental results by 2012; notes that greater effort is needed to assist the integration of biodiversity policy into other policy areas; draws attention to the need for appropriate funding of Natura 2000 and other closely related priority objectives;
meni, da se je v zvezi s kemikalijami z Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) in o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za kemikalije UL L 396, 30.12.2006, str.
Considers that, as far as chemicals are concerned, Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p.
dosegel napredek pri zmanjševanju nevarnosti za ljudi in okolje, vendar se mora še pokazati, da se bo nevarnost dejansko bistveno zmanjšala, in obžaluje, da je ta uredba skladna s cilji iz šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa le v nekaterih vidikih; obžaluje, da je bila tematska strategija v zvezi s trajnostno rabo pesticidov pripravljena z znatno zamudo ter da ukrepi za izboljšanje kakovosti zraka in mestnega okolja ter za zmanjšanje hrupa niti približno ne dosegajo ciljev iz okoljskega akcijskega programa; poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži predlog za spremenjeno direktivo o nacionalnih zgornjih mejah emisij Direktiva 2001/81/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2001 o nacionalnih zgornjih mejah emisij za nekatera onesnaževala zraka (UL L 309, 27.11.2001, str.
represents progress in reducing risks to human beings and the environment, but that it has yet to prove that it will effectively do so in a significant manner, and regrets that the regulation does not in all respects accord with the objectives agreed in the Sixth EAP; considers it regrettable that the thematic strategy concerning the sustainable use of pesticides has been substantially delayed, and that the measures taken to improve air quality and the urban environment and to reduce noise fall far short of the objectives of the Environment Action Programme; calls on the Commission to present a proposal for a revised National Emission Ceilings Directive Directive 2001/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants (OJ L 309, 27.11.2001, p.
; meni, da je treba zagotoviti izvajanje direktive o okoljskem hrupu v celoti UL L 189, 18.7.2002, str.
as soon as possible; believes that it is necessary to ensure full enforcement of the Environmental Noise Directive OJ L 189, 18.7.2002, p.
zaradi učinkov kakovosti zraka v zaprtih prostorih na zdravje poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj podprejo prizadevanja Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije na tem področju ter poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži konkretne zakonodajne ukrepe na to temo;
Given that indoor air quality affects health, urges the Commission and the Member States to support the World Health Organisation's work on indoor air quality and calls on the Commission to propose concrete legislative measures on indoor air quality as soon as possible;
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2008/32/ES (UL L 81, 20.3.2008, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2008/32/EC (OJ L 81, 20.3.2008, p.
v celoti in ponovno oceni vključevanje obveznosti EU v zvezi z varstvom voda v druge politike; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži predlog direktive o zmanjševanju uporabe fosforja v kmetijstvu ter v detergentih v skladu s členom 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 648/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o detergentih UL L 104, 8.4.2004, str.
and to re-evaluate the integration of EU water protection commitments into other policies; in addition, urges the Commission to put forward as soon as possible a proposal for a directive on cutting the phosphorus load in agriculture as well as in detergents pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on detergents OJ L 104, 8.4.2004, p.
poudarja, da je potrebna nova vodna politika, ki bo temeljila na varčevanju in trajnostnem upravljanju vodnih virov;
Emphasises the need for a new water policy that focuses on the saving of water and on the sustainable management of water resources;
obžaluje, da sta tematski strategiji za naravne vire in odpadke ublažili cilje šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa; obžaluje, da na ravni EU niso oblikovani nobeni dejanski cilji za ločitev gospodarske rasti in uporabe virov s preusmeritvijo v trajnostni model proizvodnje in potrošnje; se strinja, da so potrebni nadaljnji ukrepi v zvezi z biološkimi odpadki za spodbujanje njihove nadaljnje preusmeritve z odlagališča in zagotovitev upoštevanja najboljših možnosti za obdelavo, kot je obdelava, s katero se zmanjšujejo podnebne spremembe; še naprej spodbuja podporo okolju prijaznih oblik ravnanja z odpadki in strožjih ukrepov proti odlaganju odpadkov, ki onesnažuje okolje;
Considers it regrettable that the thematic strategies on natural resources and waste have watered down the objectives of the Sixth EAP; regrets that no concrete targets have been formulated at EU level to decouple economic growth from resource use by turning towards a sustainable model of production and consumption; agrees that further action is needed on bio-waste to encourage further diversion from landfill and ensure that the best treatment options, such as those based on mitigating climate change, are followed; further encourages support for environmentally friendly forms of waste management and measures to render more severe the consequences of land-filling of waste, which pollutes the environment;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za razumno in učinkovito uporabo naravnih virov, ki ne bo ogrožala biološke raznovrstnosti;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take all appropriate action in order to ensure that natural resources are used rationally and efficiently and in a way which does not jeopardise biodiversity;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije za krepitev izvrševanja okoljske zakonodaje na nacionalni ravni z boljšim dostopom do pravice in usklajene uporabe kaznovalnega prava; ugotavlja, da prispevajo preventivni vidiki kaznovalnega prava k boljšemu izvrševanju okoljske zakonodaje in varstvu okolja;
Commends the Commission's proposals to strengthen enforcement of environmental legislation at the national level through improved access to justice and harmonised use of punitive law; notes that the preventive aspects of punitive law contribute to better enforcement and protection of the environment;
poziva k nadaljnjemu oblikovanju in pregledu okoljske politike EU, kjer bo več pozornosti namenjene predpisovanju ciljev kot opisovanju sredstev za doseganje ciljev, kar bo državam članicam in kmetom omogočilo, da poiščejo najuspešnejše in najučinkovitejše načine za doseganje zastavljenih ciljev;
Calls, furthermore, for EU environmental policies to be designed, and reviewed, so as to focus more on goal prescriptions rather than means descriptions, leaving Member States and farmers free to find the most effective and efficient means for reaching the desired goals;
Narava, biološka raznovrstnost in sprememba podnebja
Nature, biodiversity and climate change
meni, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti popolno izvajanje direktiv o pticah in habitatih; ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti priporoča, da se sprejmejo davčni ukrepi za spodbujanje najboljše prakse in odvračanje ljudi od dejavnosti, ki povzročajo onesnaževanje;
Considers that the Commission should ensure full implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives; recommends, with due regard for the principle of subsidiarity, that taxation measures be taken to promote best practice and deter people from engaging in activities that generate pollution;
kljub temu opozarja Komisijo na dejstvo, da napotki na morebitne posledice v kazenskem pravu ne zadoščajo vedno za preprečitev nezakonitega ravnanja, s katerim se hkrati onesnažuje okolje; zato poudarja pomen naknadnega kaznovanja po kazenskem pravu, zlasti nezakonitega odlaganja nevarnih odpadkov na področju drugih držav;
Draws the Commission's attention, however, to the fact that holding out the prospect of consequences under criminal law is not sufficient in every case to prevent illegal and at the same time environmentally polluting behaviour; stresses therefore the importance of penalties after the fact under criminal law, particularly for the illegal dumping of hazardous waste in the territory of other countries;
Okoljske pobude in reforma v zvezi z dodeljevanjem subvencij za projekte, škodljive okolju
Environment incentives and reform of environmentally harmful subsidies
pozdravlja pripravo zelene knjige Komisije o tržnih instrumentih za namene okoljske politike in z njo povezanih politik; meni, da je potrebna bolj splošna uporaba tržnih instrumentov, pri čemer je treba upoštevati vpliv vseh proizvodnih in distribucijskih postopkov ter vzorcev porabe na okolje;
Welcomes the Commission's green paper on market-based instruments for environment and related policy purposes; believes that wider use of market-based instruments, taking the environmental impact of all production and distribution processes and consumption patterns into consideration, is needed;
meni, da evropski sistem trgovanja z emisijami zaradi preveč radodarne dodelitve pravic do emisij doslej še prinesel zmanjšanja emisij CO2; poudarja, da se je EU zavezala, da bo do leta 2020 zmanjšala emisije toplogrednih plinov za vsaj 20 % v primerjavi z ravnmi iz leta 1990; vztraja pri tem, da bi moral sistem trgovanja z emisijami EU za obdobje po letu 2012 določati dovolj strogo zgornjo mejo, licitiranje ter količinsko in kvalitativno omejitev pri uporabi enot potrjenega zmanjšanja emisij (CER) in enot zmanjšanja emisij (ERU);
Is of the opinion that the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) has so far not led to reductions in CO2 emissions because of the overly generous allocation of emission allowances; points out that the EU has committed itself to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 levels by at least 20% by 2020; insists that the EU ETS for the post-2012 period should include a sufficiently stringent cap, full auctioning and a quantitative and qualitative limit of the use of certified emission reductions (CERs) and emission reduction units (ERUs);
vendar ugotavlja, da je ekološko obdavčevanje še naprej manj pomembno in bo takšno ostalo še nekaj časa; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si bolj prizadevajo za reformo v zvezi z ekološkim davkom, vključno s postopnim prenosom davčne obremenitve z davkov, ki imajo negativen vpliv na blaginjo (npr. davki na delo), na davke, ki imajo pozitiven vpliv na blaginjo (npr. dejavnosti, ki škodujejo okolju, kot je raba virov ali onesnaževanje); poudarja, da zagotavljajo pogodbe kljub zahtevi po soglasju na področju obdavčevanja, možnost za okrepljeno sodelovanje, ter opozarja na obstoj odprte metode usklajevanja;
Nevertheless, notes that the role of eco-taxation remains modest and does not show an increasing trend; calls on the Commission and the Member States to devote more effort to ecological tax reform including a gradual shift of the tax burden from welfare-negative taxes (e.g. on labour) towards welfare-positive taxes, (e.g. on environmentally damaging activities, such as resource use or pollution); points out that, despite the unanimity requirement in the area of taxation, the treaties offer the possibility of enhanced cooperation, and draws attention to the existence of the open coordination method;