natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je prenos pooblastila zahtevno dejanje, pri katerem dobi Komisija nalogo, da izvrši pooblastilo, ki je lastno vlogi zakonodajalca; ker mora zato biti izhodišče pri tehtanju vprašanja o prenosu vedno svoboda zakonodajalca,
whereas delegation is a delicate operation in which the Commission is instructed to exercise a power which is intrinsic to the Legislator's own role; whereas the starting-point in examining the issue of delegation must therefore always be the freedom of the Legislator,
ker se lahko pooblastilo prenese le za dopolnitev ali spremembo delov zakonodajnega akta, ki jih zakonodajalec ocenjuje kot nebistvene; ker bodo delegirani akti, ki jih bo na tej osnovi sprejela Komisija, nezakonodajni akti splošnega obsega; ker mora temeljni akt izrecno opredeljevati cilje, vsebino, področje uporabe in trajanje prenosa pooblastila, pa tudi določati pogoje tega prenosa,
whereas this delegated power can only consist in supplementing or amending parts of a legislative act which the Legislator does not consider to be essential; whereas the resulting delegated acts adopted by the Commission will be non-legislative acts of general scope; whereas the basic act must explicitly define the objective, content, scope and duration of that delegation, and must lay down the conditions to which the delegation is subject,
ker bodo delegirani akti pomembno vplivali na številna področja; ker je zato zlasti v zvezi z delegiranimi akti nadvse pomembno, da se jih razvije in o njih odloča na povsem pregleden način, ki sozakonodajalcema dejansko omogoča, da demokratično nadzirata Komisiji dodeljena pooblastila, vključno z javno razpravo v Parlamentu, kadar je to potrebno,
whereas delegated acts will have important implications in many areas; whereas it is therefore of paramount importance, in particular with regard to delegated acts, that they are developed and decided upon in a fully transparent manner which effectively enables the co-legislators to democratically control the exercise of the power delegated to the Commission, including by public debate in Parliament, where necessary,
ker bi moral biti Parlament Svetu enakopraven glede vseh vidikov pristojnosti zakonodajnega pooblastila,
whereas Parliament should be on an equal footing with the Council with respect to all aspects of the power of legislative delegation,
ker je Lamfalussyjev postopek utrl pot sedanjemu mehanizmu prenosa pooblastila s popolnim nadzorom zakonodajalca; ker izjava št. 39 konference predstavnikov vlad držav članic z dne 23. julija 2007, priložena Lizbonski pogodbi, priznava specifično naravo področja finančnih storitev; ker novi režim za delegirane akte nikakor ne sme spodkopati obstoječih pravic Parlamenta na tem področju, še posebej kar zadeva zgodnje posredovanje dokumentov in informacij,
whereas the ‘Lamfalussy procedure’ paved the way for the present mechanism of delegation with full control by the Legislator; whereas Declaration 39 of the Conference of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 23 July 2007, annexed to the Treaty of Lisbon, recognised the specific nature of the financial services area; whereas the new regime for delegated acts cannot in any way undermine Parliament's existing rights in that area, especially concerning the early transmission of documents and information,
ker je treba na prenos pooblastil gledati kot na orodje za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje, katere cilj je, da bi bila zakonodaja preprosta ter bi jo bilo mogoče dopolniti in posodobiti brez ponovnih zakonodajnih postopkov, pri čemer pa zakonodajalec vseeno ohrani končno pristojnost in odgovornost,
whereas delegation can be seen as a tool for better law-making, the objective of which is to ensure that legislation can at the same time remain simple and be completed and updated without needing to have recourse to repeated legislative procedures, whilst also allowing the Legislator to maintain its ultimate power and responsibility,
ker člen 290 PDEU, v nasprotju s pristopom iz člena 291 PDEU o izvedbenih ukrepih, ne vsebuje pravne podlage za sprejetje horizontalnega akta, ki bi določal pravila in splošna načela za prenos pooblastila; ker je zato treba ta pravila opredeliti v vsakem temeljnem aktu posebej,
whereas, by contrast with the approach taken in Article 291 TFEU concerning implementing measures, Article 290 TFEU does not contain a legal basis for the adoption of a horizontal act setting out the rules and general principles applicable to delegations of power; whereas those conditions must therefore be set out in each basic act,
ker je Komisija odgovarja Parlamentu; ker se je komisar, pristojen za medinstitucionalne odnose in administrativne zadeve, v svoji predstavitvi pred Odborom za ustavne zadeve 18. januarja 2010 zavezal k tesnemu sodelovanju s Parlamentom in bi Komisija na ta način prenesena pooblastila izvrševala v skladu z željami Parlamenta,
whereas the Commission is accountable to Parliament; whereas the Commissioner responsible for inter-institutional relations and administration made a commitment, at his hearing before the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on 18 January 2010, to work very closely with Parliament to ensure that the Commission's exercise of delegated power was to Parliament's satisfaction,
Vidiki, ki naj jih opredeljuje temeljni akt
Aspects to be defined in the basic act
meni, da je treba cilje, vsebino, področje uporabe in trajanje pooblastila v skladu s členom 290 PDEU izrecno in natančno opredeliti v vsakem temeljnem aktu;
Considers that the objectives, content, scope and duration of a delegation pursuant to Article 290 TFEU must be expressly and meticulously defined in each basic act;
poudarja, da daje člen 290 PDEU zakonodajalcu svobodo pri izbiri nadzornega mehanizma; meni, da sta dva primera, našteta v členu 290(2), in sicer nasprotovanje in preklic, zgolj ponazorilna ter da bi se lahko prenos pooblastila podredil tudi drugim načinom nadzora, kot sta na primer izrecna odobritev Parlamenta in Sveta za vsak delegirani akt ali možnost preklica posameznih delegiranih aktov, ki so že v veljavi;
Stresses that Article 290 TFEU gives the Legislator the freedom to choose which control mechanism(s) to put in place; considers that the two examples enumerated in Article 290(2), objection and revocation, are purely illustrative and that one could envisage subjecting a delegation of power to other means of control, such as an express approval by Parliament and the Council of each delegated act or a possibility of repealing individual delegated acts already in force;
je sicer mnenja, da je mogoče primera možnih pogojev iz člena 290(2) PDEU, nasprotovanje in preklic, obravnavati kot najbolj običajna načina nadzora nad Komisijo pri njenem izvajanju prenesenega pooblastila, zato bi ju moral vsebovati vsak temeljni akt;
Takes the view, however, that the two examples of possible conditions mentioned in Article 290(2) TFEU, objection and revocation, may be regarded as the most usual ways to control the Commission's use of delegated powers and should both be included in every basic act;
meni, da morajo nadzorni mehanizmi, ki jih določi zakonodajalec, spoštovati nekatera splošna načela prava Unije in da morajo še zlasti:
Is of the opinion that the control mechanisms set out by the Legislator must respect certain general principles of Union law and that, in particular, they must:
biti preprosti in lahko razumljivi,
be simple and easily understandable,
zagotavljati pravno varnost,
safeguard legal certainty,
Komisiji omogočati učinkovito izvajanje prenesenega pooblastila, in
enable the Commission to exercise the delegated power effectively, and
zakonodajalcu omogočati ustrezen nadzor nad uporabo prenesenega pooblastila;
enable the Legislator to monitor properly the use made of delegated power;
meni, da je uveljavljanje pravice Parlamenta do nasprotovanja nujno pogojeno z njegovo parlamentarno vlogo in kraji dela; meni, da fiksen rok za nasprotovanje, ki bi veljal za vse pravne akte, ni upravičen in da mora biti v temeljnem aktu določen za vsak primer posebej, s čimer se bo lahko upoštevala kompleksnost posamezne zadeve, rok pa mora biti zadosti dolg, da bo omogočal učinkovit nadzor nad prenosom pooblastila, a brez nepotrebnega zavlačevanja uveljavitve nespornih delegiranih aktov;
Considers that Parliament's exercise of the right of objection is necessarily conditioned by its parliamentary role and places of work; considers that a fixed period for objection applicable to all legal acts is not warranted, and that that period should be fixed on a case-by-case basis in each basic act taking into account the complexity of the issues and must be sufficient to permit effective control of the delegation, without unduly delaying the entry into force of uncontroversial delegated acts;
meni, da bi moral biti nujni postopek iz temeljnega akta uveden le za zelo izjemne primere, povezane na primer z varnostnimi vprašanji, zdravjem ali humanitarnimi krizami;
Considers that an urgency procedure provided for in the basic act itself should be introduced for particularly exceptional cases, for example relating to security matters, health or humanitarian crises;
meni, da bi lahko veliko večino primerov, pri katerih je potrebno hitro sprejetje delegiranih aktov, na zahtevo Komisije v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih vendarle obravnavali s prožnim postopkom zgodnjega nenasprotovanja Parlamenta in Sveta;
Believes, however, that the vast majority of situations requiring the speedy adoption of delegated acts could be dealt with by a flexible procedure for early non-objection by Parliament and the Council, following a request by the Commission in duly justified cases;
vztraja, da je trajanje prenosa pooblastila lahko neomejeno, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se prenos pooblastila lahko kadarkoli prekliče; vendar meni, da bi pooblastilo z omejenim trajanjem lahko redno podaljševali na izrecno zahtevo Komisije; meni, da se lahko prenos pooblastila podaljša, če ne Parlament ne Svet v predvidenem roku ne nasprotujeta;
Maintains that the duration of a delegation can be indefinite, taking into account the fact that the delegation can be revoked at any time; is of the opinion, however, that a delegation of a limited duration could provide for the possibility of periodic renewal following an express request by the Commission; considers that the delegation can only be renewed if neither Parliament nor the Council expresses any objections within a specified deadline;
močno nasprotuje temu, da bi v temeljne akte poleg določb, ki jih že vsebuje člen 290 PDEU, vključili še določbe o dodatnih obveznostih zakonodajalca;
Strongly rejects the insertion in basic acts of provisions imposing on the Legislator additional obligations over and above those already contained in Article 290 TFEU;
meni, da bi bilo določene praktične predpise bolje usklajevati s skupnim dogovorom med institucijami, ki bi bil lahko v obliki medinstitucionalnega sporazuma in bi med drugim zajemal:
Considers that certain practical arrangements could be better coordinated in a Common Understanding between the institutions, which may take the form of an inter-institutional agreement covering inter alia:
posvetovanje pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov,
consultations in the preparation and drawing-up of delegated acts,
izmenjavo informacij, še zlasti v primeru preklica,
mutual exchanges of information, in particular in the event of a revocation,
postopke za posredovanje dokumentov,
arrangements for the transmission of documents,
minimalne roke za nasprotovanje Parlamenta in Sveta,
minimum periods for objection by Parliament and the Council;
računanje rokov,
computation of time periods,
objavo aktov v
the publication of acts in the
Uradnem listu
Official Journal
na različnih stopnjah postopka;
at different stages in the procedure;
poudarja, da mora Komisija pri pripravi in oblikovanju delegiranih aktov:
Stresses that, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, the Commission must:
zagotoviti zgodnje in stalno posredovanje informacij in dokumentov pristojnim odborom Parlamenta, vključno z osnutki delegiranih aktov in prejetimi prispevki; v ta namen bi se komitološki register lahko uporabljal kot model za boljši digitalni informacijski sistem;
ensure an early and continuous transmission of information and relevant documents to Parliament's relevant committees, including successive drafts of delegated acts and any contributions received; to this end, the current comitology register could be used as a model for an improved digital information system,
omogočiti udeležbo Parlamenta na pripravljalnih sestankih, izmenjavah mnenj in posvetovanjih;
give Parliament access to related preparatory meetings, exchanges of views and consultations;
je mnenja, da preglednost, vljudnost in lojalno sodelovanje med institucijami narekujejo, da se pred preklicem izmenjajo informacije, s čimer se zagotovi, da so z možnostjo preklica pravočasno in v celoti seznanjene vse institucije; hkrati ocenjuje, da bi bilo odveč in bi povzročalo zmedo, če bi v temeljne akte poleg splošne zahteve iz člena 296 PDEU, ki velja za vse pravne akte, uvedli še posebno pravno obveznost utemeljitve za sprejetje določenih pravnih aktov;
Is of the opinion that the exchange of information prior to a revocation should take place as a matter of transparency, courtesy and loyal cooperation between the institutions concerned thereby ensuring that all institutions are fully aware of the possibility of revocation in good time; however, deems it redundant and confusing to introduce a specific legal obligation in basic acts requiring a statement of reasons for the adoption of certain legal acts in addition to the general requirement laid down in Article 296 TFEU which is applicable to all legal acts;
predlaga, naj se minimalni rok za nasprotovanje določi v prihodnjem sporazumu, česar se ne sme razumeti kot omejevanje, temveč le kot minimum, brez katerega bi demokratični nadzor Parlamenta postal neučinkovit; meni, da bi moral biti rok, v katerem se lahko aktu nasprotuje, najmanj dva meseca z možnostjo podaljšanja za nadaljnja dva meseca na pobudo Parlamenta ali Sveta; vendar poudarja, da bi moral biti rok za nasprotovanje odvisen od narave delegiranega akta;
Proposes that a minimum period for objection be fixed in any future Agreement, it being made clear that this should be understood not as a straitjacket but merely as a minimum below which Parliament's democratic control would become nugatory; considers that the minimum period for objection should be two months, with a possibility of its being extended by a further two months at the initiative of Parliament or the Council; stresses, however, that the period for objection should depend on the nature of the delegated act;
poudarja, da je pri sklepanju vsakršnega sporazuma treba upoštevati, da lahko različni roki za nadzor nad delegiranimi akti stečejo šele potem, ko Komisija posreduje vse jezikovne različice, in da morajo ustrezno upoštevati parlamentarne počitnice in volilna obdobja;
Insists, in the context of any future Agreement, that the various periods for scrutiny of delegated acts must only start on transmission by the Commission of all language versions, and must properly take account of Parliament's recess and electoral periods;
poudarja, da je pri sklepanju vsakršnega sporazuma treba upoštevati, da so lahko delegirani akti, pri katerih se lahko uveljavlja pravica do nasprotovanja, objavljeni le v Uradnem listu in da začnejo veljati po izteku roka za nasprotovanje, razen v primeru zgodnjega nenasprotovanja; meni, da je izrecna obveznost, po kateri morata Parlament in Svet v vsakem temeljnem aktu objaviti sprejete odločitve o nadzoru nad Komisijo pri njenem izvajanju prenesenega pooblastila, odvečna;
Stresses, in the context of any future Agreement, that delegated acts subject to a right of objection can only be published in the Official Journal and thus enter into force after the expiry of the period for objection, except where an early non-objection is granted; considers that an express obligation requiring Parliament and the Council in each basic act to publish decisions taken in controlling the Commission's exercise of delegated power is superfluous;
poziva vse svoje odbore, naj izmenjujejo in redno posodabljajo najboljšo prakso in vzpostavijo mehanizem za čim bolj usklajeno delovanje Parlamenta v skladu s členom 290 PDEU; poudarja, da mora vsak parlamentarni odbor svoje delo organizirati skladno s svojo posebno naravo in z uporabo pridobljenega strokovnega znanja;
Calls on each of its committees to exchange and regularly update best practice and establish a mechanism to ensure that Parliament's practices under Article 290 TFEU are as coherent as possible; underlines the need for each parliamentary committee to organise its work in a way that is consistent with its specific nature and takes advantage of its accumulated expertise;
naloži upravi Parlamenta, naj s (proračunsko nevtralno) prerazporeditvijo zagotovi sredstva za potrebna nova delovna mesta za ustrezno podporo pri nalogah, ki izhajajo iz člena 290 PDEU; poziva k institucionalnemu pristopu do ocenjevanja upravnih struktur in človeških virov, ki so na voljo za razvoj prenesenih pristojnosti;
Requires Parliament's administration to reallocate resources as a (budget-neutral) means of providing the posts needed to deliver appropriate support for the performance of tasks connected with Article 290 TFEU; calls for an institutional approach to assess the administrative structures and human resources available to develop delegated competences;
, opredelijo kot delegirani akti;
are defined as delegated acts;
meni, da je treba za celovito ohranitev pristojnosti zakonodajalca posebno pozornost nameniti ustrezni uporabi členov 290 in 291 PDEU ter praktičnim posledicam sklicevanja na en ali drug člen, pa naj bo to med zgoraj omenjeno prilagoditvijo ali pri obravnavi predlogov po rednem zakonodajnem postopku; vztraja, da imata sozakonodajalca moč odločiti, ali naj se zadeve, ki so bile že sprejete v regulativnem postopku s pregledom, sprejmejo v skladu s členom 290 PDEU ali po rednem zakonodajnem postopku;
Considers that, in order to fully preserve the Legislator's prerogatives, special attention should be given to the relative use of Articles 290 and 291 TFEU and to the practical consequences of having recourse to one article or the other, be it during the above-mentioned alignment or when dealing with proposals under the ordinary legislative procedure; insists that the co-legislators have the power to decide that the matters previously adopted under the regulatory procedure with scrutiny can be adopted either under Article 290 TFEU or under the ordinary legislative procedure;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 o strateških ciljih in priporočilih za pomorsko prometno politiko EU do leta 2018 ( 2009/2095(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 May 2010 on strategic goals and recommendations for the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018 ( 2009/2095(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. januarja 2009 o strateških ciljih in priporočilih za pomorsko prometno politiko EU do leta 2018„ ( COM(2009)0008 ) (v nadaljevanju: sporočilo o pomorski prometni politiki EU do leta 2018),
having regard to the Commission communication of 21 January 2009 on strategic goals and recommendations for the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018 ( COM(2009)0008 ) (‘communication on the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018’),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. oktobra 2007 o celostni pomorski politiki za Evropsko unijo ( COM(2007)0575 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 10 October 2007 on an integrated maritime policy for the European Union ( COM(2007)0575 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0114/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0114/2010 ),
ker evropski lastniki ladij pomembno prispevajo k evropskemu gospodarstvu, vendar morajo biti konkurenčni v globalnem okolju,
whereas European ship owners make an important contribution to the European economy but have to compete in a global environment,
ker so strukturni in celoviti ukrepi za zaščito in razvoj uspešnega pomorskega sektorja v Evropi pomembni in bi morali okrepiti konkurenčnost v pomorskem prometu in sorodnih sektorjih ter biti skladni z zahtevami trajnostnega razvoja in poštene konkurence,
whereas structural and integrated measures to preserve and develop the thriving maritime sector in Europe are important and ought to enhance the competitiveness of maritime transport and related sectors, integrating the requirements of sustainable development and fair competition,
ker je treba mlade nujno navdušiti za pomorske poklice in jih zadržati na tem področju in ker je treba raven izobraževanja na področju pomorstva v Evropi s prihodnjim pregledom Mednarodne konvencije o standardih za usposabljanje, izdajanje spričeval in ladijsko stražarjenje pomorščakov (konvencija STCW) izboljšati,
whereas attracting young people to, and keeping them in, maritime careers is an absolute necessity, and the level of training for maritime professionals in Europe needs to be improved through the impending revision of the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping of Seafarers (STCW Convention),
ker so podnebne spremembe največji izziv 21. stoletja za vsa področja evropske politike,
whereas climate change poses the greatest challenge for all areas of European policy in the 21st century,
ker je pomorski promet okolju razmeroma prijazna vrsta prometa z veliko potenciala, da postane še čistejši, in ker mora sodelovati pri prizadevanjih za boj proti podnebnim spremembam tako, da postopoma znižuje ogljikov odtis ladij in pristaniških infrastruktur,
whereas maritime transport is a relatively environmentally sound mode of transport, which nonetheless has much potential to become even cleaner than it already is; whereas it must be involved, through a gradual reduction in the carbon footprint of vessels and port infrastructures, in the efforts to combat climate change,
ker je varnost najpomembnejši pogoj za pristaniška podjetja, lastnike ladij in osebje na kopnem in morju; ker morajo varnostni ukrepi upoštevati zaščito obalnega in morskega okolja ter delovne razmere v pristaniščih in na plovilih,
whereas safety is of the utmost importance to ports, ship owners and seafarers on board and on shore; whereas safety measures must take into consideration protection of the coastal and marine environment as well as working conditions in ports and on board vessels,
ker v Adenskem zalivu, pred obalo Somalije in v mednarodnih vodah še naprej prihaja do kriminalnih napadov na evropske ribiške, trgovske in potniške ladje,
whereas criminal attacks on European fishing and commercial vessels and passenger ships continue to take place in the Gulf of Aden, off the coast of Somalia and in international waters,
ker ima evropska pomorska industrija vodilno vlogo v svetu, ki jo mora ohraniti na dolgi rok, to pa je mogoče doseči samo z inovativnostjo,
whereas the European maritime industry is a world leader, its lead must be safeguarded in the long term and this is achievable only through innovation,
ker je treba odločitve sprejemati na ustrezni upravni ravni, tj. na svetovni ravni, kadarkoli je to mogoče, in na evropski ravni, kadarkoli je to potrebno,
whereas decisions need to be taken at the right administrative level, which means at global level where possible and at European level where necessary,
pozdravlja sporočilo o pomorski prometni politiki do leta 2018;
Welcomes the communication on the EU's maritime transport policy until 2018;
poudarja, da je sektor pomorskega prometa izjemno pomemben za evropsko gospodarstvo, saj prevaža potnike, surovine, blago in energetske proizvode in je tudi jedro širšega spektra pomorskih dejavnosti, kot so pomorska industrija, logistika, raziskave, turizem, ribolov in ribogojstvo ter izobraževanje;
Stresses the importance of the maritime transport sector to the European economy, not only as a carrier of passengers, raw materials, goods and energy products but also as the core of a wider cluster of maritime activities such as the naval industry, logistics, research, tourism, fisheries and aquaculture, and education;