natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja na zgoraj navedeno sporočilo iz leta 2008 ( KOM(2008)0110 ), v katerem je Komisija izjavila, da so ukrepi 1, 3, 3N, 5, 8 in 13 zaključeni;
Recalls the statement made by the Commission in its above-mentioned 2008 communication ( COM(2008)0110 ) that Actions 1, 3, 3N, 5, 8 and 13 have been completed;
kljub temu poudarja, da doslej ni bil seznanjen z obstojem dokumentacije ali dokazil, ki bi upravičevali to izjavo; zato je primoran izraziti resne dvome o tem, ali so bili ukrepi zaključeni, preneseni v prakso in ali so pripomogli k napredku pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta;
Points out nevertheless that so far it has been unaware of supporting documents or statements justifying such a declaration; is forced therefore to seriously question whether these measures have been completed and whether they have been implemented or have had an impact on the progress of the implementation of the Action Plan;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj podrobneje poroča o sodelovanju z nacionalnimi partnerskimi organi in navede, kdaj naj bi bili vidni pozitivni učinki sodelovanja;
Calls on the Court of Auditors to report in more detail on cooperation with its national counterparts and to predict when this cooperation will show positive effects;
Ukrepa 5 in 13: spodbujanje uporabe letnih povzetkov in izjav uprave
Actions 5 and 13: promotion of the use of annual summaries and management declarations
pozdravlja letne povzetke revizij in izjave na nacionalni ravni, prvič predstavljene dne 15. februarja 2008, ki so velik korak na poti do uresničitve cilja izboljšave upravljanja sredstev EU; obžaluje pa pomanjkljivo preglednost v zvezi z letnimi povzetki, ki jih Komisija ni posredovala Parlamentu;
Welcomes the annual summaries of available audits and declarations at national level, presented for the first time on 15 February 2008, which are a considerable step towards the target of improving management of EU funds; regrets, however, the lack of transparency concerning these annual summaries, which the Commission had not sent to Parliament;
pozdravlja pripravo letnih povzetkov od leta 2008 naprej, oceno in izjave, ki jih je v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leti 2006 in 2007 podal generalni direktorat, zadolžen za strukturne sklade, vendar meni, da ukrepa 5 in 13 še zdaleč nista zaključena, saj Parlament ni prejel dovolj informacij;
Welcomes the provision as from 2008 of annual summaries and the assessment and declarations provided in the 2006 and 2007 Annual Activity Reports of the Directorates-General dealing with Structural Funds, but is far from considering Actions 5 and 13 as having been completed as there is a lack of information to Parliament;
obžaluje, da Parlament od Komisije doslej še ni prejel popolnih informacij v zvezi z oceno in primerjalno analizo prvih predstavljenih letnih povzetkov;
Regrets that Parliament has until now not received complete information from the Commission concerning the assessment and comparative analysis of the first annual summaries presented;
poudarja tudi, da Evropsko računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu za 2007 navaja, da letna poročila zaradi nesorazmernih predstavitev še ne nudijo zanesljive ocene o delovanju in učinkovitosti sistema;
Points out moreover that in its Annual Report for 2007, the ECA states that due to the disparity of presentation, annual summaries do not yet provide a reliable assessment of the functioning and effectiveness of the system;
Ukrep 11N: razvoj tipologije napak ter povezava z izterjavami in finančnimi popravki
Action 11N: developing a typology of error and relationship with recoveries and financial corrections
obžaluje, da Komisija po besedah Evropskega računskega sodišča kljub velikim prizadevanjem ni predstavila popolnih podatkov ali dokazala, da je mogoče sčasoma predstavljene podatke brez dvoma uskladiti z objavljenimi finančnimi izkazi;
Regrets the fact that, despite the considerable efforts made by the Commission, according to the ECA the Commission was unable to present complete figures or demonstrate that the figures eventually presented could be clearly reconciled with the published financial statements;
poziva Komisijo, naj ta pomemben ukrep dokončno izvede ter tako izboljša izpolnjevanje zahtev za poročanje ter poveča natančnost podatkov, ki jih posredujejo države članice;
Encourages the Commission to complete the implementation of this important action in order to obtain a greater degree of compliance with reporting requirements and to improve the accuracy of the data provided by Member States;
Ukrep 8N: sodelovanje z nacionalnimi vrhovnimi revizijskimi institucijami in možnosti uporabe njihovega dela za zagotavljanje zanesljivosti
Action 8N: cooperation with the National Supreme Audit Institutions and how their work can be used to provide assurance
poudarja, da utegnejo neodvisne vrhovne revizijske institucije kot zunanji revizorji nacionalne javne porabe igrati ključno vlogo pri reviziji javnih sredstev, čeprav niso del okvira notranje kontrole;
Points out that, although not a part of the internal control framework, the independent Supreme Audit Institutions, as external auditors of national public spending, may be able to play a key role in the audit of public funds;
v celoti podpira sodelovanje med nekaterimi nacionalnimi vrhovnimi revizijskimi institucijami in Komisijo, do katerega je prišlo na pobudo slednje, in spodbuja ohranjanje stikov s temi institucijami, da se ugotovi, kako je mogoče z njihovim delom povečati zanesljivost pri izvajanju programov v državah članicah;
Fully supports the cooperation started by the Commission with some of the National Supreme Audit Institutions, and encourages continued contact with such institutions with the aim of determining how their work can be used to increase assurance as regards the execution of programmes in the Member States;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za razvoj strukturiranega pristopa k ohranjanju stikov z nacionalnimi vrhovnimi revizijskimi institucijami ter poziva Komisijo, naj zaključi izvajanje tega ukrepa v tesnem sodelovanju z Evropskim računskim sodiščem;
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to develop a structured approach to support contacts with National Supreme Audit Institutions and furthermore encourages the Commission to complete the implementation of this action in close cooperation with the ECA;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. marca 2009 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah ( 2008/2180(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters ( 2008/2180(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 z dne 28. maja 2001 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah ( KOM(2007)0769 ),
having regard to the Commission's report on the application of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters ( COM(2007)0769 ),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 UL L 174, 27.6.2001, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju tekočega dela haaške konference o praktični uporabi Haaške konvencije z dne 18. marca 1970 o pridobivanju dokazov v tujini v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah,
having regard to the ongoing work of the Hague Conference on the practical operation of the Hague Convention of 18 March 1970 on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0058/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0058/2009 ),
ker se Uredba (ES) št. 1206/2001 ni izvajala tako učinkovito, kot bi bilo mogoče, in je zato treba sprejeti nadaljnje ukrepe, da bi se izboljšalo sodelovanje med sodišči držav članic na področju pridobivanja dokazov in povečala učinkovitost uredbe,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 has not been enforced as effectively as it might have been, and further action is therefore needed in order to improve cooperation between the Member States" courts for the purposes of taking evidence and enhancing the efficiency of the Regulation,
ker se z Uredbo (ES) št. 1206/2001 želi izboljšati, poenostaviti in pospešiti sodelovanje med sodišči pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 sets out to improve, simplify and accelerate cooperation between courts on the taking of evidence in civil and commercial matters,
ker je Komisija sicer na koncu leta 2006 in v začetku leta 2007 poskrbela za razdelitev skupno 50 000 izvodov praktičnega vodnika državam članicam, vendar je bilo to storjeno veliko prepozno in je zato treba sprejeti več dodatnih ukrepov, da bi bili udeleženi v postopkih, zlasti sodišča in pravniki, bolje obveščeni o uredbi,
whereas the Commission admittedly arranged for the distribution of a total of 50 000 copies of the practice guide to Member States in late 2006/early 2007, but this was done much too late, and other steps accordingly need to be taken in addition so as to enable those involved in proceedings, especially courts and practitioners, to be better informed about the Regulation,
ker je Komisija vseeno ugotovila, da je 90-dnevni rok za izpolnitev zaprosil za pridobivanje dokazov iz člena 10(1) uredbe prekoračen v znatnem številu primerov ter da je v "nekaterih primerih [...] potrebnih celo več kot 6 mesecev",
whereas the Commission finds nevertheless that the 90-day time-limit for complying with requests for the taking of evidence laid down in Article 10(1) of the Regulation is exceeded in a "significant number of cases" and that "in some cases even more than 6 months are required",
ker je le v malo državah članicah že na voljo oprema za videokonference in se zato te ne uporabljajo v zadostni meri, in ker hkrati države članice ne spodbujajo dovolj uvajanja sodobne komunikacijske tehnologije, pa tudi Komisija ni predlagala jasnih izboljšav v zvezi s tem,
whereas only a few Member States currently have facilities for video-conferencing, which is consequently not being sufficiently used; whereas, in addition, Member States are not doing enough to introduce modern communications technology, and nor is the Commission proposing any specific remedies on that point,
obsoja zapoznelo predložitev prej omenjenega poročila Komisije, ki bi moralo biti po členu 23 Uredbe (ES) št. 1206/2001 predloženo do 1. januarja 2007, dejansko pa je bilo predloženo šele 5. decembra 2007;
Condemns the late submission of the above-mentioned Commission report, which, according to Article 23 of Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001, should have been submitted by 1 January 2007 but in fact was not submitted until 5 December 2007;
soglaša s Komisijo, da bi si morale države članice bolj prizadevati za to, da bi sodniki in pravniki v državah članicah bolj upoštevali uredbo, da se tako spodbudijo neposredni stiki med sodišči, saj se je izkazalo, da lahko neposredno pridobivanje dokazov iz člena 17 uredbe poenostavi in pospeši zbiranje dokazov, ne da bi povzročalo kakšne težave;
Concurs with the Commission that greater efforts should be made by Member States to bring the Regulation sufficiently to the attention of judges and practitioners in the Member States in order to encourage direct court-to-court contacts, since the direct taking of evidence provided for in Article 17 of the Regulation has shown its potential to simplify and accelerate the taking of evidence, without causing any particular problems;
meni, da je nujno treba upoštevati, da imajo osrednji organi iz uredbe še vedno pomembno vlogo pri nadzorovanju dela sodišč, ki so pristojna za obravnavanje zaprosil v skladu z uredbo, in pri reševanju nastalih težav; poudarja, da lahko Evropska pravosodna mreža pomaga pri reševanju težav, ki jih ne rešijo osrednji organi in da bi se lahko manj posluževali teh organov, če bi bila sodišča, ki zaprosijo, bolje seznanjena z uredbo; meni, da je lahko pomoč osrednjih organov odločilna za majhna lokalna sodišča, ki se prvič spopadajo s težavo pri pridobivanju dokazov v čezmejnem sporu;
Considers that it is essential to bear in mind that the central bodies provided for in the Regulation still have an important role to play in overseeing the work of the courts which have responsibility for dealing with requests under the Regulation and in resolving problems when they arise; points out that the European Judicial Network can help to solve problems which have not been resolved by the central bodies and that recourse to those bodies could be reduced if requesting courts were made more aware of the Regulation; takes the view that the assistance provided by the central bodies may be critical for small local courts faced with a problem relating to the taking of evidence in a cross-border context for the first time;
zagovarja obsežno uporabo informacijske tehnologije in videokonferenc, skupaj z varnim sistemom za pošiljanje in prejemanje elektronske pošte, ki bi morala sčasoma postati običajen način za posredovanje zaprosil za pridobivanje dokazov; ugotavlja, da nekatere države članice v svojih odgovorih na vprašalnik, ki ga je poslala haaška konferenca, omenjajo težave v zvezi z združljivostjo video povezav, in meni, da bi bilo treba to obravnavati v okviru evropske strategije na področju e-pravosodja;
Advocates the extensive use of information technology and video-conferencing, coupled with a secure system for sending and receiving e-mails, which should become in due course the ordinary means of transmitting requests for the taking of evidence; notes that, in their responses to a questionnaire sent out by the Hague Conference, some Member States mention problems in connection with the compatibility of video links, and considers that this should be taken up under the European e-Justice strategy;
meni, da dejstvo, da v številnih državah članicah oprema za videokonference še ni na voljo, ter ugotovitev Komisije, da se sodobna komunikacijska sredstva še vedno redko uporabljajo, potrjujeta razumnost načrtov za evropsko strategijo na področju e-pravosodja, ki jih je nedavno priporočil Odbor za pravne zadeve Parlamenta; poziva države članice, naj namenijo več sredstev namestitvi sodobne komunikacijske opreme na sodišča ter usposabljanju sodnikov za njihovo uporabo, in poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi konkretne predloge za izboljšanje sedanjega stanja; meni, da je treba čim prej v ustreznem obsegu omogočiti pomoč in finančno podporo Evropske unije;
Considers that the fact that in many Member States facilities for video-conferencing are not yet available, together with the Commission's finding that modern means of communication are "still used rather rarely", confirms the wisdom of the plans for the European e-Justice strategy recently recommended by Parliament's Legal Affairs Committee; urges Member States to put more resources into installing modern communications facilities in the courts and training judges to use them, and calls on the Commission to produce specific proposals aimed at improving the current state of affairs; takes the view that the appropriate degree of EU assistance and financial support should be provided as soon as possible;
meni, da bi si bilo treba v okviru strategije e-pravosodja prizadevati za pomoč sodiščem pri zadovoljevanju potreb po prevajalcih in tolmačih, ki nastanejo zaradi čezmejnega pridobivanja dokazov v razširjeni Evropski uniji;
Takes the view that efforts should be made in the context of the e-Justice strategy to assist courts in meeting the translation and interpreting demands posed by the taking of evidence across borders in an enlarged European Union;
z veliko zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Komisija prišla do zaključka, da je 90-dnevni rok za izpolnitev zaprosil za pridobivanje dokazov iz člena 10(1) uredbe prekoračen v velikem številu primerov ter da je v "nekaterih primerih [...] potrebnih celo več kot 6 mesecev"; poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži konkretne predloge za ukrepe, da bi se rešil ta problem, pri čemer bi bilo treba upoštevati tudi možnost pritožbenega organa ali kontaktne točke v Evropski pravosodni mreži;
Notes with considerable concern the Commission's finding that the 90-day time-limit for complying with requests for the taking of evidence, as laid down in Article 10(1) of the Regulation, is exceeded in a "significant number of cases" and that "in some cases even more than 6 months are required"; calls on the Commission to submit specific proposals as quickly as possible on measures to remedy this problem, one option to consider being a complaints body or contact point within the European Judicial Network;
obsoja dejstvo, da poročilo Komisije navaja, da se je zaradi Uredbe (ES) št. 1206/2001 pridobivanje dokazov izboljšalo v vseh pogledih, in tako daje napačno predstavo o razmerah; zato poziva Komisijo, naj omogoči praktično pomoč, med drugim v okviru strategije e-pravosodja, in si bolj prizadeva za uresničitev možnosti, ki jih daje uredba za izboljšanje delovanja civilnega sodstva za državljane, podjetja, pravnike in sodnike;
Criticises the fact that, by concluding that the taking of evidence has been improved in every respect as a result of Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001, the Commission report presents an inaccurate picture of the situation; calls on the Commission, therefore, to provide practical support, inter alia in the context of the e-Justice strategy, and to make greater efforts to realise the true potential of the Regulation for improving the operation of civil justice for citizens, businesses, practitioners and judges;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. marca 2009 o izvajanju Direktive 2006/43/ES o obveznih revizijah za letne in konsolidirane računovodske izkaze ( 2008/2247(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 on implementation of Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts ( 2008/2247(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/43/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. maja 2006 o obvezni reviziji letnih in konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazov UL L 157, 9.6.2006, str.
having regard to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti – 24. letno poročilo Komisije Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0494 .
having regard to its resolution of 21 October 2008 on monitoring the application of Community law – 24th annual report from the Commission Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0494 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji UL C 187 E, 24.07.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better regulation in the European Union OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0014/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0014/2009 ),
ker je Parlament večkrat poudaril, da ima zakonodaja EU smisel samo v primeru, če jo države članice upoštevajo, in ker je zato treba izboljšati spremljanje prenosa in uporabe zakonodaje EU v državah članicah; ker je Parlament predlagal, naj pristojni poročevalec predloži poročilo o napredku po izteku roka za prenos,
whereas Parliament has repeatedly stated that there is a point to EU legislation only if it is complied with in the Member States, and whereas monitoring of the transposition and application of EU legislation by Member States must therefore be stepped up; whereas Parliament has proposed that, after the transposition deadline has expired, the rapporteur should inform Parliament of the state of play,
ker sta Parlament in Svet dne 17. maja 2006 sprejela Direktivo 2006/43/ES (direktivo) in se je 29. junija 2008 iztekel rok za prenos v državah članicah ter ker je treba preveriti, ali je bil prenos izveden pravilno,
whereas Directive 2006/43/EC ("the Directive") was adopted by Parliament and the Council on 17 May 2006 and the period for transposition in the Member States expired on 29 June 2008, and whereas there must be an examination as to whether transposition has proceeded correctly,
ker je Komisija objavila pregled napredka, ki sicer opredeljuje, katere člene kdo izvaja, vendar ne podaja informacij o poteku izvajanja in ne navaja, ali nacionalni predpisi dosegajo minimalni standard, ki ga določa direktiva,
whereas the "scoreboard" published by the Commission, whilst identifying which articles have been implemented by whom, provides no information on the way in which implementation has proceeded or on whether national rules meet the minimum standard set by the Directive,
ker je cilj direktive, prvič, izboljšati kakovost revizij letnih računovodskih izkazov po vsej EU in tako povečati zaupanje v to poročanje in izboljšati stanje na finančnih trgih, in drugič, vzpostaviti enake pogoje za računovodski sektor na notranjem trgu,
whereas the objective of the Directive is, first, to optimise the quality of audits of annual accounts throughout the EU, thus increasing confidence in such reporting and improving the situation in the financial markets, and, second, to establish a level playing-field for the accountancy sector within the internal market,
ker je treba preveriti izvajanje direktive v državah članicah glede na oba cilja,
whereas implementation of the Directive in Member States must be checked by reference to this twin objective,
ugotavlja, da je bila direktiva sprejeta v odziv na krizo, ki je sledila propadu družbe Enron; poudarja, da trenutna finančna kriza opozarja na pomen visoko kakovostnih računovodskih in revizijskih praks; obžaluje, da je direktivo v celoti preneslo samo 12 držav; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi takojšen prenos in izvajanje;
Notes that the Directive was adopted in response to the crisis that followed the collapse of Enron; emphasises that the current financial crisis highlights the importance of high-quality accounting and auditing practices; deplores the fact that only 12 Member States have transposed the Directive in full; urges the Commission to ensure its immediate transposition and enforcement;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da prenos ključnih pojmov "subjekt javnega interesa" Člen 2(13) direktive.
Notes with concern that transposition of the crucial notions of "public-interest entity" Article 2(13) of the Directive.
in "mreža" Člen 2(7) direktive.
(PIE) and "network" Article 2(7) of the Directive.