natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
kljub stalnemu napredku izjav o zanesljivosti od leta 2003 (leta 2008 je 56 % odhodkov dobilo pozitivna revizijska mnenja Računskega sodišča v primerjavi s 6 % leta 2003), ostaja zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče ocenilo, da še ni mogoče ugotoviti, ali je imel akcijski načrt merljive učinke na nadzorne in kontrolne sisteme, in ker Komisija ne more pokazati, da so bili izvedeni ukrepi za izboljšavo nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov učinkoviti pri zmanjševanju možnosti napak na nekaterih proračunskih področjih (točki 2.28 in 2.33 Letnega poročila za leto 2008);
Notwithstanding the progressive improvement in the DAS since 2003 (56 % of expenditure being given positive audit opinions by the Court in 2008 compared to 6 % in 2003), remains concerned by the Court's assessment that it is not yet possible to determine whether the Action Plan has had a measurable impact on the supervisory and control systems, and that the Commission is not able to demonstrate that the steps taken by it to improve supervisory and control systems have been effective in mitigating the risk of error in some areas of the budget (points 2.28 and 2.33 of the 2008 Annual Report);
zahteva, da Komisija še naprej redno predloži oceno integriranega sistema notranje kontrole, in zahteva, da letno poročilo o dejavnostih in zbirno poročilo še bolje in jasneje pokrivata delovanje službe Komisije in sistem deljenega upravljanja držav članic, kakor v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnosti že počne Generalni direktorat Evropske komisije za regionalno politiko;
Calls on the Commission to continue to present regular assessments of the integrated internal control system, and calls for even better and more explicit coverage – in the annual activity reports and the synthesis report – of the functioning of Commission departments‘ and Member States’ shared-management systems, as is already done by the Commission's DG for Regional Policy in its annual activity report;
Analiza obstoječega ravnovesja med odhodki iz poslovanja in stroški kontrolnega sistema za sredstva EU
Analysis of the existing balance between operational expenditure and the cost of the EU funds‘ control system
v zvezi s tem opozarja na pomen ukrepa 10 iz omenjenega akcijskega načrta, ki predlaga izvedbo analize stroškov kontrol, saj je treba doseči primerno ravnovesje med stroški in koristmi kontrol;
Draws attention, in this context, to the importance of Action 10 of the above-mentioned Action Plan, which proposes making an ‘analysis of the costs of controls’, in view of the ‘need to reach an appropriate balance between the costs and benefits of controls’;
poziva Komisijo, naj leta 2010 celoviteje in bolj izčrpno oceni sredstva, namenjena sistemom kontrole za odhodke na področju raziskav, energetike, prometa, razvoja podeželja, zunanje pomoči in upravljanja, kot je zahteval Parlament v svojih prejšnjih resolucijah, priloženih sklepom o razrešnicah;
Calls on the Commission to carry out in 2010 a more complete and exhaustive evaluation of the resources given over to control systems in the areas of research, energy, transport, rural development, external aid and administrative expenditure, as requested by Parliament in its previous resolutions accompanying the discharge decisions;
meni, da bo to glavni pripomoček za oceno, kakšen napredek se lahko doseže v prihodnosti in za kakšne stroške, skladno s predlogom Računskega sodišča v Letnem poročilu za leto 2008 (točka 2.35(a)), ter za dosego napredka, povezanega z vprašanjem dopustnega tveganja napake;
Believes that this will be a crucial tool for assessing what future improvements can be achieved and at what cost, as recommended by the Court in its 2008 Annual Report (point 2.35(a)), and for achieving progress on the question of tolerable risk of error;
upošteva zgoraj omenjeno sporočilo Komisije z dne 16. decembra 2008 o enotnem razumevanju pojma dopustnega tveganja napake, ki bo dobra metodološka osnova za ekonomsko analizo sprejemljive stopnje tveganja; ponovno izraža dvome glede številk, ki so jih posredovale države članice v zvezi s stroški kontrole, in Komisijo poziva, naj posodobi in dopolni številke, uporabljene v sporočilu; Komisijo poziva, naj obravnava vse slabosti in pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče, in izpostavlja naslednje:
Takes note of the above-mentioned Commission communication of 16 December 2008 on a common understanding of the concept of tolerable risk of error as a sound methodological basis for an economic analysis of acceptable levels of risk; recalls its doubts concerning the figures provided by the Member States on control costs and calls on the Commission to update and complete the figures used in the communication; invites the Commission to address all weaknesses and shortcomings identified by the Court of Auditors, and underlines the following:
opredelitev dopustnega tveganja napake je le eden od več elementov, ki jih je treba raziskati z namenom, da se izboljša finančno poslovodenje Evropske unije; drugi elementi so (1) boljša uporaba obstoječih sistemov kontrole, (2) povečanje na splošno zelo nizkih stroškov kontrole, (3) poenostavitev in (4) koncentracija;
the definition of a possible tolerable risk of error is only one of several elements to be explored with a view to improving financial management in the European Union; other elements are (1) better use of existing control systems, (2) an increase in what are generally very low control costs, (3) simplification and (4) concentration;
kakovost informacij, ki so na voljo v državah članicah, trenutno ne zadostuje kot podlaga za vzpostavitev in odobritev dopustnega tveganja napake;
the quality of the information available from the Member States is currently not sufficient as a basis for the establishment and approval of a tolerable risk of error;
stališče Sveta glede tega vprašanja ni znano;
the Council's position on the question is not known;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi podrobno analizo pomanjkljivosti in slabosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Evropsko računsko sodišče http://eca.europa.eu/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/2410290.PDF.
Calls on the Commission to provide a detailed analysis of the shortcomings and weaknesses identified by the Court of Auditors http://eca.europa.eu/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/2410290.PDF.
, zlasti glede kakovosti podatkov, ki so na voljo v državah članicah;
, especially regarding the quality of the data available from the Member States;
ponovno opozarja na ukrep 4 zgoraj navedenega akcijskega načrta, ki v skladu s priporočili Parlamenta predlaga „začetek medinstitucionalnega dialoga o dopustnih tveganjih pri transakcijah, povezanih z računovodskimi izkazi; vendar ugotavlja, da se je ta ukrep komaj začel izvajati;
Recalls Action 4 of the above-mentioned Action Plan, which, in line with the recommendations of Parliament, proposes the initiation of ‘interinstitutional dialogue on risks to be tolerated in the underlying transactions’; notes, however, that implementation of this action has scarcely begun;
zato meni, da bi morala Komisija ob upoštevanju načel sorazmernosti in stroškovne učinkovitosti (cenovne primernosti) kontrolnih sistemov oceniti razmerje med sredstvi, ki so na voljo za posamezno politiko, na eni strani ter delom teh sredstev, namenjenim kontrolnim sistemom glede na področje odhodkov na drugi strani;
Considers, therefore, that the Commission, in line with the principles of proportionality and cost efficiency (value for money) of the control systems, should evaluate the relationship between, on the one hand, the resources available for each particular policy, and, on the other, the part of those resources dedicated to the control systems broken down by area of expenditure;
poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli politično zelo občutljiva področja (kjer obstaja veliko tveganje izgube ugleda), za katera je treba namesto ekonomskega uvesti kakovosten pristop k stopnjam napak;
Asks the Commission to identify areas of high political sensitivity (with high ‘reputational risk’) where a quality approach to rates of error (rather than an economic one) should be adopted;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri določanju stopnje dopustne napake upoštevati tudi obseg sredstev Unije, za katere obstaja tveganje zaradi napak;
Considers that the volume of Union funds at risk because of errors should also be taken into consideration when a tolerable error rate is determined;
meni, da bi moralo biti razmerje med stroški in koristmi med sredstvi, namenjenimi za kontrolo, in rezultati teh kontrol, temeljni element, ki ga mora upoštevati Računsko sodišče pri oblikovanju izjave o zanesljivosti;
Believes also that the cost-benefit ratio existing between the resources dedicated to control activities and the results obtained by the controls should be a key element to be taken into account by the Court when it delivers its DAS;
obžaluje, da Komisija več truda vlaga v prepričevanje Parlamenta o potrebi po uvedbi „dopustnega tveganja napake“, kot pa v prepričevanje držav članic o potrebi po obveznih nacionalnih izjavah o upravljanju;
Regrets that the Commission puts more effort into convincing Parliament about the need to introduce a ‘tolerable risk of error’ than into persuading Member States of the need for mandatory national management declarations;
poudarja, da kontrolni sistemi odražajo zapletenost uredb in pravil na različnih, včasih prekrivajočih se ravneh; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši proces poenostavitve in pri tem v celoti vključi Parlament, ter prosi države članice in regije, naj temu namenijo ustrezna prizadevanja;
Emphasises that control systems are a reflection of the complexity of regulations and rules on the various, sometimes overlapping levels; urges the Commission, therefore, to speed up the simplification exercise whilst fully involving Parliament, and asks Member States and regions to make corresponding efforts to that end;
Medinstitucionalna razprava o veljavnem sistemu postopka za razrešnico
Interinstitutional debate on the current discharge procedure system
poziva Komisijo, naj organizira medinstitucionalno razpravo, v kateri bodo sodelovali v začetni fazi na najvišji ravni predstavniki Sveta, Komisije, Računskega sodišča in Parlamenta, in v drugi fazi predstavniki iz držav članic, nacionalnih parlamentov in vrhovnih revizijskih ustanov, v kateri bi celostno obravnavali veljavni sistem postopka za razrešnico;
Calls on the Commission to organise an interinstitutional discussion involving in the initial phase, at the highest level, representatives of the Council, of the Commission, of the Court of Auditors and of Parliament, and in the second phase representatives from the Member States, of national parliaments and supreme audit institutions, with a view to embarking on a comprehensive debate on the current discharge procedure system;
predlaga, da bi dal Komisiji v prihajajočem proračunskem postopku potrebne finančne vire za organizacijo te razprave;
Proposes to give the Commission, during the forthcoming budgetary procedure, the financial resources needed to organise such debate;
Letna poročila o dejavnosti
Annual activity reports
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu za 2008 ponovno poudarilo, da nekatera letna poročila o dejavnosti še vedno ne vključujejo zadostnih dokazov za izjavo o zanesljivosti; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj v različna poglavja letnega poročila vključi podrobno analizo ustreznih letnih poročil o dejavnosti;
Regrets that, in the 2008 Annual Report, the Court once again stresses that some of the annual activity reports still do not include sufficient evidence for its DAS; invites the Court of Auditors to include in the different chapters of the Annual Report a detailed analysis of the corresponding annual activity reports;
z zaskrbljenostjo opaža, da Računsko sodišče še vedno ugotavlja pomanjkljivosti pri delovanju nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ter pri ustreznih pridržkih na zagotovila v izjavah generalnih direktorjev Komisije, kar zadeva njihov vpliv na zagotovilo o zakonitosti in pravilnosti zadevnih transakcij, ter opozarja države članice in Komisijo na njihove pristojnosti na tem področju;
Expresses its concern about the fact that the Court continues to find weaknesses in the operation of supervisory and control systems and in the relevant reservations on the assurance given in the declarations by the Commission's Directors-General, namely as regards their impact on the assurance concerning the legality and regularity of underlying transactions, and reminds the Member States and the Commission of their respective responsibilities in this field;
vztraja, da mora imeti javnost dostop do informacij o vseh članih strokovnih in delovnih skupin, ki sodelujejo s Komisijo, kakor tudi do razkritja upravičencev do sredstev EU;
Insists that the public must have access to information on all members of expert groups and working groups working with the Commission as well as disclosure concerning beneficiaries of EU funding;
ponovno opozarja, da mora Komisija odgovarjati za to, da so podatki, ki jih posreduje o upravičencih do sredstev EU, popolni, da jih je možno najti in da so primerljivi, vključno s podrobnostmi o prejemnikih in njihovih projektih;
Insists that the Commission must be responsible for ensuring the completeness, searchability and comparability of the data provided concerning the beneficiaries of EU funding, including details of recipients and their projects;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bo o podatkih o upravičencih do sredstev EU obveščena širša javnost, na lahko dostopni in uporabnikom prijazni spletni strani, ter poziva k standardizaciji strukture in predstavitve nacionalnih, regionalnih in mednarodnih strani, dostopnih z osrednjega portala;
Welcomes the fact that the information on EU funding beneficiaries is to be published more widely and on an easily accessible and user-friendly website, and calls for standardisation of the structure and presentation of national, regional and international sites accessible from a central portal;
ponovno poudarja, da je treba pregledati veljaven Kodeks ravnanja članov Komisije, da bi odpravili pomanjkljivosti, kot so: (a) kodeks ne opredeljuje izraza „navzkrižje interesov“, (b) kodeks ne predpisuje ukrepanja, če pride do navzkrižja interesov, (c) nejasnost glede sprejemanja daril in gostoljubnosti, in (d) odsotnost organa, ki bi bil zadolžen za pregled pritožb in predsednika odvezal od (morebitne) dolžnosti samoocenjevanja;
Emphasises once again the need to revise the present Code of Conduct of the Members of the Commission in order to remedy shortcomings such as: (a) the absence of any definition of the term ‘conflict of interest’, (b) the failure to prescribe a course of action if a conflict of interest arises, (c) a lack of clarity with regard to the acceptance of gifts and hospitality, and (d) the absence of any body designated to look into complaints as well as to relieve the President from the (possible) duty of self-assessment;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija začela s postopkom posvetovanj s Parlamentom o reviziji veljavnega Kodeksa ravnanja za člane Komisije skladno z dogovorom, ki sta ga 27. januarja 2010 dosegla predsednik José Manuel Barroso in parlamentarna delovna skupina za revizijo okvirnega sporazuma med Parlamentom in Komisijo, in da bo najkasneje do avgusta 2010 sprejela spremenjeno različico Kodeksa ravnanja članov Komisije, hkrati pa opaža, da bi morala biti ta revizija opravljena pred imenovanjem nove Komisije;
Expects the Commission to begin the process of consulting Parliament on revision of the present Code of Conduct of the Members of the Commission in accordance with the common understanding reached on 27 January 2010 between President José Manuel Barroso and Parliament's Working Party on the revision of the Framework Agreement between the Parliament and the Commission, and to adopt the revised version of its Code of Conduct of the Members of the Commission by August 2010 at the latest, whilst observing that this revision should have been done prior to the appointment of the new Commission;
opozarja na pomen popolne preglednosti in obveščanja glede osebja v kabinetih članov Komisije, ki ni bilo zaposleno v skladu s Kadrovskimi predpisi;
Recalls the importance of complete transparency and publicity with regard to staff working in the cabinets of Members of the Commission who have not been recruited in accordance with the Staff Regulations;
poleg tega opozarja, da bi moral zavezujoči Kodeks ravnanja članov Komisije zajemati potrebne etične standarde in vodilna načela, ki jih morajo komisarji spoštovati pri opravljanju svoje funkcije, zlasti pri imenovanju sodelavcev v svojem kabinetu;
Also recalls that the binding Code of Conduct of the Members of the Commission should incorporate the necessary ethical rules and the principal guidelines to be observed by Commissioners in the conduct of their office, in particular when appointing colleagues, especially to their cabinets;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da so vsi zaposleni dobro usposobljeni in primerno obveščeni o svojih dolžnostih in pravicah iz členov 22a in 22b kadrovskih predpisov;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that all staff are well trained and properly briefed about their obligations and rights under Articles 22a and 22b of the Staff Regulations;
opaža majhno zmanjšanje (iz 31,8 % leta 2007 na 30,9 % leta 2009) osebja za „upravno podporo in usklajevalne dejavnosti“, kar je le del skupnih splošnih stroškov; opozarja na svojo prejšnjo zahtevo po ukrepih, s katerimi bi dosegli 20-odstotni delež na tem področju (odstavek 217 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 23. aprila 2009);
Notes the small decrease (from 31,8 % in 2007 to 30,9 % in 2009) in staff allocated to ‘administrative support and coordination functions’, which forms only part of the overall overhead; recalls its previous demands for measures aimed at attaining a proportion of 20 % in this area (paragraph 217 of its above-mentioned resolution of 23 April 2009);
poziva Komisijo, da pred obnovo kadrovskih predpisov za uradnike in pogojev za zaposlitev drugih uslužbencev na ustrezni pravni in aktuarski osnovi izdela in predloži alternativne metode za uskladitev nadomestil uradnikov in drugih uslužbencev; meni, da bo tako dosežena širša osnova za izračun letne uskladitve in hitrejša uskladitev nadomestil, posledično pa se bo v tem tudi bolje odražal splošen razvoj gospodarstva v državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission, in the run-up to review of the Staff Regulations of officials and Conditions of Employment of other servants, to devise and submit alternative methods for the adjustment of the pay of officials and other servants on a proper legal and actuarial basis; considers that this should bring about a broader basis of calculation for the annual adjustment and a prompter pay adjustment, and thus more appropriately reflect general economic developments in the Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči koristi uvrščanja kandidatov v vstopne plačilne razrede izključno glede na njihovo primernost ter naj predloži predloge za uvrščanje usposobljenega osebja v višje plačne razrede; v okviru ocene pričakuje tudi poročilo o konkretni uporabi članov kabineta po njihovem izstopu in glede na pogoje, ki so jih morali izpolnjevati ob prihodu;
Calls on the Commission to assess the value of placing candidates in entry pay grades solely in the light of their suitability and to put forward proposals for placing qualified staff in higher pay grades; expects also, as part of the assessment, a report on the practical use of cabinet members after they leave office and in relation to the entry conditions they were expected to fulfil;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi stališče o tem, v kolikšni meri so bili izpolnjeni varčevalni cilji, opredeljeni ob spremembi kadrovskih predpisov leta 2004, predvsem z vidika povečanja prispevkov uradnikov in drugih uslužbencev za področje zdravstvene preventive in pokojnin;
Calls on the Commission to state its position on the extent to which the savings foreseen in the 2004 reform of the Staff Regulations have actually been achieved, especially with regard to the increase in contributions by officials and other servants in the areas of health care and pensions;
ponovno opozarja na svojo zahtevo (odstavka 254 in 255 zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 23. aprila 2009) po oblikovanju in uvedbi splošnega sistema upravljanja „regulativnih agencij“ ter uvedbi učinkovitega nadzornega sistema za agencije Unije;
Recalls its demand (paragraphs 254 and 255 of its above-mentioned resolution of 23 April 2009) for the development and implementation of a general management system for the ‘regulatory agencies’ as well as for the introduction of an effective monitoring system for the Union agencies;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je Komisija, ne glede na to, da so nekatere agencije pravno neodvisne, še vedno odgovorna za izvrševanje proračuna (skladno s členom 317(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, členi 54, 55 in 185 Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 in členoma 37 in 41(2) Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št 2342/2002);
Stresses in that regard that, notwithstanding the legally independent status of certain agencies, the Commission remains responsible for the implementation of the budget (in accordance with Article 317(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Articles 54, 55 and 185 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 and Article 37 and Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002);
je zaskrbljen zaradi števila preiskav, ki trajajo več kot devet mesecev, in zaradi nizke stopnje nadaljnje obravnave primerov, ki jih preiskuje urad OLAF s strani nacionalnih pravosodnih organov, ter meni, da bi bilo treba opraviti oceno kadrovskih virov urada OLAF, da bi ugotovili, ali bi povečanje števila zaposlenih lahko prineslo izboljšave na teh dveh področjih;
Is concerned at the number of investigations taking over nine months and the low level of follow-up in national judiciaries of cases investigated by OLAF, and believes that an assessment of the staffing resources in OLAF should be carried out in order to see whether increased staffing could bring improvements in these two areas;
pozdravlja, da si je nova Komisija dne 15. januarja 2010 prizadevala sprostiti razpravo o reformi urada OLAF v Svetu in najpozneje do sredine leta 2010 kot podlago za pogajanja v Svetu pripraviti obljubljen „dokument o razmisleku“, ki bi moral biti pripravljen že zdavnaj;
Welcomes the undertakings of 15 January 2010 by the new Commission to unblock discussions in the Council about the reform of OLAF and to come forward, at the latest by July 2010, with the promised and long overdue Commission's ‘reflection paper’ as a basis for negotiations in the Council;
ponovno poudarja pomen upoštevanja stališča Parlamenta po prvi obravnavi z dne 20. novembra 2008 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 glede preiskav, ki jih opravlja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) UL C 16 E, 22.1.2010, str.
Reiterates the importance of taking into account Parliament's first-reading position of 20 November 2008 on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) OJ C 16 E, 22.1.2010, p.
, ter želi poudariti, da bi moral urad OLAF zaradi svoje moči v prihodnje ostati v okviru Komisije in obenem ohraniti svojo neodvisnost; ponovno poudarja, da člen 317 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije državam članicam namenja večjo odgovornost in tako podpira ponavljajoče se pozive Parlamenta k tesnejšemu sodelovanju držav članic z uradom OLAF;
, and wishes to re-emphasise that, for the future strength of OLAF, it should remain within the Commission whilst retaining its independence; recalls that Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union places an enhanced responsibility on the Member States and thus supports Parliament's continuous call for improved cooperation by the Member States with OLAF;