natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je zaskrbljen zaradi stalnega večanja števila vseh vrst agencij (decentraliziranih, izvršnih in regulatornih agencij) ter obžaluje, da Komisija ni mogla zagotoviti podrobnosti o večletnem programu dela za agencije v naslednjem finančnem okviru; poziva zakonodajne oblasti, da pri ustanavljanju novih agencij upoštevajo učinek na proračun; poudarja, da na proračun EU močno vpliva tudi povečanje delovnih nalog posameznih agencij; poziva države članice, da pri ustanavljanju novih agencij prevzamejo potrebno odgovornost za njihovo financiranje v prihodnje;
Is concerned about the constant increase of all types of agencies (decentralised, executive and regulatory agencies) and deplores the fact that the Commission has not been able to provide details of multi-annual programming for agencies over the next financial framework; calls on the legislative authorities to take budgetary impacts into account when establishing new agencies; emphasises, in the same context, that the increase in the working tasks of individual agencies also has massive budgetary impacts on the EU budget; calls on the Member States, in connection with the establishment of new agencies, to take the necessary responsibility for their future financing;
poudarja, da bi morali proračunski in zakonodajni organi v prihodnje stalno nadzorovati razvoj agencij, ne le zaradi upravnega bremena, ki ga decentralizirani organi ustvarjajo za proračun (2735 uslužbencev več, kot v kadrovskih načrtih Komisije v proračunu za leto 2005), ampak tudi zaradi tveganja medvladnega vplivanja na skupno politiko prek prisotnih predstavnikov držav članic v njihovih upravnih odborih in pomanjkanja demokratične odgovornosti Evropskemu parlamentu;
Stresses that the development of agencies should in future be continuously examined by both the budgetary and legislative authorities, not only because of the administrative burden decentralised bodies create for the budget (2 735 staff on top of the Commission's establishment plans in the 2005 budget), but also because of the risk of intergovernmental influence on common policies through the presence of Member States' representatives on their management boards and the lack of democratic accountability to the European Parliament;
poziva k podobnemu pristopu, kot je bil zahtevan za upravne izdatke Komisije, ki temelji na vzpostavitvi obvezujoče zgornje meje za agencije, zunaj preglednice finančne perspektive, ki jo lahko zviša le sklep proračunskega organa, ob uporabi vseh sredstev, ki jih bo ponujal prihodnji medinstitucionalni sporazum; s temi sredstvi namerava izboljšati nadzor in preglednost nad agencijami brez škodljivih vplivov na programe;
Calls for an approach similar to that requested for the Commission's administrative expenditure, based on the establishment of a binding ceiling for the agencies, outside the Financial Perspective table, which can be increased only by a decision of the budgetary authority using all means offered by the future Interinstitutional Agreement; intends by these means to improve control and transparency over the agencies without adverse effects on the programmes;
Revizija, prilagodljivost in rezerve
Revision, flexibility and reserves
opozarja, da so bili v sedanji finančni perspektivi aktivirani vsi različni instrumenti, predvideni za povišanje zgornje meje finančne perspektive, kot so revizija, prilagoditev, prilagodljivost in solidarnostni sklad, po skupnem sporazumu za odzivanje na stalne in strukturne potrebe ali za financiranje nepredvidenih potreb; poudarja, da je instrument prilagodljivosti nujno potreben z vidika večletnega okvira; opozarja, da je bila finančna perspektiva do leta 1999 večkrat revidirana in da se je v zadnjih letih, zlasti pa med sedanjo finančno perspektivo (2000-2006), instrument prilagodljivosti uporabil šest let od sedmih, kar jasno kaže, da so bili nekateri razdelki nezadostno financirani; poziva, da se mehanizmi prilagodljivosti v prihodnje ne uporabljajo za financiranje trajnih letnih potreb;
Recalls that during the current Financial Perspective all the various instruments provided for to increase the ceiling of the Financial Perspective, such as revision, adjustment, flexibility and the Solidarity Fund, were mobilised following a joint agreement to respond to permanent and structural needs or to finance unforeseen needs; stresses that flexibility is an indispensable tool in a multi-annual context; recalls that until 1999 the Financial Perspective was revised on a number of occasions and that, over recent years, and especially during the current Financial Perspective (2000-2006), the Flexibility Instrument has been mobilised six years out of seven, which clearly shows that some headings were underfinanced; calls, in future, for the flexibility mechanisms not to be used to finance permanent annual needs;
poudarja, da bo prilagodljivost imela ključno vlogo pri pogajalskem izhodišču Evropskega parlamenta; zavrnil bo vsakršen poskus Sveta, da bi sprejel finančni okvir brez primernih mehanizmov, ki bi ga prilagodili prihodnjim potrebam, in meni, da ima proračunski organ veliko odgovornost za zagotovitev takšnih mehanizmov; meni, da so obseg in instrumenti prilagodljivosti tesno povezani z določitvijo skupnih številk in končno zgradbo ter trajanjem finančnega okvira;
Emphasises that flexibility will play a crucial part in the European Parliament's negotiating position; will reject any attempt by the Council to agree on a financial framework without appropriate mechanisms to adapt it to future needs and considers that it is a major responsibility of the budgetary authority to provide for such mechanisms; believes that the volume and the instruments of flexibility are closely linked to the decision on the overall figures and the final structure and duration of the financial framework;
zato predlaga:
Therefore proposes:
da se sprejme predlog Komisije za postopek revizije z večletnim učinkom, ki bo vključeval trajne spremembe finančnega okvira, ki jih lahko pospeši sprejetje z isto večino kot za sprejetje proračuna (s kvalificirano večino v Svetu in absolutno večino v Parlamentu),
to accept the Commission proposal for a revision procedure with multi-annual effect to cover lasting changes to the financial framework which may be facilitated by being adopted by the same majority as for the adoption of the budget (qualified majority in Council and absolute majority in Parliament),
da se sprejme predlog Komisije o prilagodljivosti za zakonodajne akte, vendar da se ta prilagodljivost poveča na 10 % nad vsotami, določenimi s soodločanjem, ali pod njimi,
to accept the Commission proposal on flexibility for legislative acts but to increase this flexibility to 10 %, above or below the amounts fixed under codecision;
da se zavrne predlog Komisije o prilagodljivosti pri prerazporeditvi proračunskih sredstev med razdelki,
to reject the Commission proposal for the reallocation flexibility between headings,
da se oblikujejo znatne rezerve za prilagodljivost zunaj finančnega okvira, ki bodo Evropski uniji omogočile odziv na nepredvidene potrebe in nepričakovane krize,
to create significant reserves for flexibility outside the financial framework to enable the European Union to respond to unforeseen needs and unexpected crises;
da se načrtuje prenova finančne perspektive, če se spremenijo temeljne predpostavke glede gospodarskega razvoja, npr. v primeru znatnega odstopanja od predvidene stopnje rasti 2,3 %;
to plan an overhaul of the Financial Perspective if fundamental assumptions regarding economic development change, for example in the event of a significant deviation from the assumed growth rate of 2.3%;
poudarja, da je načelo oblikovanja rezerv za prilagodljivost neprenosljiv del celotnega sporazuma o finančnem okviru; meni, da bi morala biti stopnja prilagodljivosti tesno povezana s splošno zgornjo mejo finančnega okvira in da bilo treba zneske za nepredvidene potrebe:
Stresses that the principle of creating reserves for flexibility is a non-negotiable part of the overall agreement on the financial framework; considers that the level of flexibility should be closely linked to the global ceiling of the financial framework and that the amounts allocated to unforeseen needs should:
izključiti iz finančnega okvira,
be placed outside the financial framework,
aktivirati v skladu s predlogom Komisije z odločitvijo proračunskega organa,
be mobilised pursuant to a Commission proposal by a decision of the budgetary authority,
– s ponovnim načrtovanjem znotraj poglavij,
- through re-programming within the headings,
– s prerazporeditvijo neporabljenih dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev znotraj razdelkov in med njimi,
- through the redeployment of unused appropriations within and across headings,
– z novimi proračunskimi sredstvi, če sta prva dva načina nezadostna;
- through new appropriations in the event that the first two means are insufficient;
poziva, da se v primeru dodelitve novih proračunskih sredstev zahteva sredstva od držav članic šele po sprejetju odločitve, da se kar najbolj zmanjša obremenitev davkoplačevalcev; predlaga, naj se proračunski organ dogovori o poenostavljenem postopku, da se pospeši izvajanje vseh odločitev;
asks that, in the event of new appropriations, the funds should be demanded from Member States only after the decision has been taken, reducing to an absolute minimum the burden on taxpayers; proposes that the budgetary authority should agree on a simplified procedure to speed up the implementation of each decision;
meni, da bi morala skupna prilagodljivost predstavljati 0,03 % BND (v skladu s točko 20 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999) in bi jo bilo treba uporabiti za naslednje cilje:
Considers that this overall flexibility should represent 0.03% of GNI (in line with point 20 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999) and should be used for attainment of the following objectives:
– rezerva za konkurenčnost (največ 7 milijard EUR):
- Reserve for competitiveness (up to a maximum of EUR 7 billion):
nov instrument, ki nadomešča sklad za prilagajanje rasti in ga predlaga Komisija, namenjen povečanju rasti in konkurenčnosti, Uniji pa bo omogočil odziv na gospodarske spremembe,
new instrument replacing the Growth Adjustment Fund, proposed by the Commission, to be mobilised to boost growth and competitiveness and to allow the Union to react to economic changes;
– rezerva za kohezijo (največ 3 milijarde EUR):
- Reserve for cohesion (up to a maximum of EUR 3 billion):
nov instrument za razvoj mehanizma, ki je namenjen odzivu na gospodarske šoke in nenadne spremembe v regijah EU in državah članicah, upravičenih v skladu z razdelkom 1b) tudi s ponovnim načrtovanjem neporabljenih dodeljenih proračunskih sredstev,
new instrument aiming to develop a mechanism to be mobilised to react to economic shocks and abrupt changes in EU regions and Member States eligible under Heading 1b) even through the reprogramming of unused appropriations;
– rezerva: nujna pomoč (največ 1,5 milijarde EUR):
- Reserve: Emergency Aid (up to a maximum of EUR 1.5 billion):
obstoječ instrument, ki ga je treba izključiti iz finančne perspektive,
existing instrument to be placed outside the Financial Perspective;
– rezerva: solidarnostni sklad (največ 6,2 milijarde EUR):
- Reserve: Solidarity Fund (up to a maximum of EUR 6.2 billion)
obstoječ instrument, ki ni vključen v finančno perspektivo in za katerega Komisija predlaga, da se ga v proračunu načrtuje pod zgornjo mejo,
existing instrument that is already outside the Financial Perspective and that the Commission proposes to budget under the ceiling;
– rezerva za garancije (največ 3,0 milijarde EUR):
- Reserve for loans guarantee (up to a maximum of EUR 3.0 billion):
del te rezerve je bil predviden v razdelku 4; to načelo bi bilo treba razširiti na zagotovitev finančnih sredstev za projekte na področju prevoza in infrastrukture; ta instrument bi bilo treba izključiti iz finančne perspektive,
part of this reserve existed under Heading 4; the principle should be extended to guarantee the financing of transport and infrastructure projects; this instrument should be placed outside the Financial Perspective;
– rezerva za prožnost (največ 3,5 milijarde EUR):
- Reserve for flexibility (up to a maximum of EUR 3.5 billion):
obstoječ instrument, ki je izključen iz finančne perspektive in je zanj predviden višji znesek 500 milijonov EUR;
existing instrument already placed outside the Financial Perspective and with an increased amount of EUR 500 million;
Del III Proračunska sredstva in nadomestne možnosti
Part III Budgetary means and alternatives
meni, da je predlog Komisije gledano v celoti sprejemljiv; meni, da če so bili nekateri razdelki precenjeni, drugi ne izražajo ambicij, ki bi jih razširjena Unija s 490 milijoni prebivalcev lahko v prihodnjih letih pričakovala v političnem, gospodarskem in solidarnostnem smislu;
Considers that the Commission proposal is globally acceptable; is of the opinion that, whilst some headings have been overestimated, others do not reflect the ambitions that an enlarged Union of 490 million inhabitants may expect in political, economic and solidarity terms over the coming years;
meni, da je treba raziskati možnosti in nadomestne možnosti za kompromis med ambicijo poglobitve evropske povezave, strogostjo proračuna, zakonitimi pričakovanji novih držav članic in predlogi Komisije; je tudi pripravljen vzpostaviti ponovno ravnotežje globalnega obsega izdatkov glede na svoje politične prednostne naloge v prihodnosti;
Is of the opinion that options and alternatives need to be explored to find a compromise between the ambition to deepen European integration, budgetary rigour, the legitimate expectations of the new Member States and the Commission's proposals; is also willing to rebalance the global volume of expenditure in accordance with its own political priorities for the future;
opaža, da bo po predlogu Komisije obseg sredstev, namenjenih kmetijstvu, zmanjšan s 45 % leta 2007 na 35 % leta 2013; opaža, da čeprav se sčasoma poveča le za 3 %, to še vedno predstavlja nesorazmerje v obsegu proračunskih sredstev, ki bo celo še večje, če se obseg nekaterih politik zoži v primerjavi z drugimi politikami; bo zavrnil vsakršen poskus za renacionalizacijo SKP; je zaskrbljen, da je, ob odsotnosti političnega in finančnega sporazuma, še vedno vprašljivo financiranje ukrepov, povezanih s trgom, in neposrednih izplačil za Bolgarijo in Romunijo nad zgornjo mejo, ki jo je določil Svet leta 2002 za EU-25, in zato predlaga, da bi se morala za zagotovitev ravni podpore, določene s sklepom Evropskega sveta oktobra 2002, vzpostaviti možnost uvajalnega postopka obveznega sofinanciranja v EU-15, če potrebe presežejo napovedi,
observes that, in accordance with the Commission proposal, the volume of appropriations earmarked for agriculture will fall from 45% in 2007 to 35% in 2013; observes that, although it increases only by 3% over the period, it still represents a disproportionate volume of appropriations which will be even higher if some policies are reduced compared with other policies; will reject any attempt to renationalise the CAP; is concerned that, in the absence of political and financial agreement, the funding of market-related measures and direct payments for Bulgaria and Romania above the ceiling agreed by the Council in 2002 for EU-25 remains in doubt, and proposes therefore that, in order to guarantee the level of support set by the decision of the European Council of October 2002, the possibility of a phasing-in process of compulsory co-financing should be initiated within EU-15 if the needs exceed the forecasts,
– Evropski razvojni sklad (ERS):
- European Development Fund (EDF):
ponovno opozarja, da je Evropski parlament močno podpiral vključitev ERS v splošni proračun na podlagi načela enotnosti proračuna in zaradi preglednosti, vendar pa ugotavlja, da vključitev v proračun v finančnem smislu ne bi smelo ogrožati drugih politik; zato poudarja, da je vključitev v proračun sprejemljiva le, če splošna zgornja meja finančnega okvira ustvari dodatna sredstva v splošnem proračunu; poudarja, da je treba v proračunu predvidena odobrena sredstva namensko dodeliti, da bi preprečili negativen učinek na države AKP; poudarja, da je treba spoštovati načelo partnerstva z državami AKP, ko bo ERS vključen v splošni proračun,
recalls that the European Parliament has strongly supported the integration of the EDF into the general budget on the basis of the principle of the unity of the budget and for reasons of transparency, but observes that, in financial terms, the budgetisation should not jeopardise other policies; underlines therefore that the budgetisation is only acceptable if the overall ceiling of the financial framework brings additional resources into the general budget; points out that the appropriations budgeted should be ring-fenced to avoid any negative effect on the ACP countries; stresses that the principle of partnership with the ACP countries must be respected when the EDF is integrated into the general budget,
– Sklad za prilagajanje rasti:
- Growth Adjustment Fund:
zavzema negativno stališče do predloga Komisije; se strinja s rezervo prilagodljivosti za konkurenčnost iz odstavka 47,
takes a negative view of the Commission proposal; is in favour of a flexibility reserve for competitiveness as described in paragraph 47,
– Solidarnostni sklad:
- Solidarity Fund:
meni, da je bolje ohraniti sedanji sistem, ki se financira kot rezerva zunaj omejitev, najvišji znesek pa se uporabi le, kadar je to nujno, kot je navedeno v odstavku 47,
considers it preferable to maintain the current system, financed as a reserve outside the ceilings with a maximum amount to be mobilised only when deemed necessary, as described in paragraph 47,
– Nujna pomoč:
- Emergency aid:
zavzame negativno stališče do predloga Komisije za vključitev nujne pomoči v zgornje meje; predlaga vzpostavitev mehanizma nujne pomoči, omejenega zunaj določenih zgornjih meja, ki bi se po potrebi financiral z enakim mehanizmom kot sedanji solidarnostni sklad, kot je navedeno v odstavku 47,
takes a negative view of the Commission proposal to include emergency aid under the ceilings; proposes the creation of an emergency aid mechanism ring-fenced outside the ceiling to be funded when deemed necessary with the same mechanism as for the current Solidarity Fund, as described in paragraph 47
zavzema negativno stališče do predlogov Komisije za ta mehanizem iz razdelka 4 in predlaga, da se podoben mehanizem razširi na druge razdelke, kot je navedeno v odstavku 47,
takes a negative view of the Commission proposals for this mechanism under Heading 4 and proposes to extend a similar mechanism to other headings as described in paragraph 47,
– Podrazdelek 1a): Konkurenčnost za rast in zaposlovanje:
- Sub-Heading 1a) Competitiveness for Growth and Employment:
meni, da bi morali "lizbonski cilji" ostati prednostna naloga za Unijo v naslednjem finančnem okviru, za dosego ciljev pa si je treba močno prizadevati; meni, da bi morala proračunska sredstva biti primerna, ampak realna, povečana, ampak ne precenjena, omejena na subsidiarnost in jasno evropsko dodano vrednost; zato v celoti podpira predlog Komisije za raziskave in TEN-T; predlaga globalno prerazporeditev 4,7 milijard EUR iz rezerve in neprednostnih dejavnosti v razdelek 3 (+ 1,3 milijarde EUR), razdelek 4 (+ 2,7 milijarde EUR) in vseživljenjsko učenje (+ 670 milijonov EUR); razen tega tudi notranjo prerazporeditev 200 milijonov EUR iz TEN-E v socialni program,
considers that the "Lisbon objectives" should remain a priority for the Union in the next financial framework, and that significant efforts must be made towards achieving the targets; considers that the budgetary means should be appropriate but realistic, increased but not overestimated, limited to subsidiarity and clear European added value; therefore fully supports the Commission proposal for research and TENs-T; proposes a global redeployment of EUR 4.7 billion from the margin and non-priority activities towards Heading 3 (+ EUR 1.3 billion), Heading 4 (+ EUR 2.7 billion) and lifelong learning (+ EUR 670 million), as well as an internal redeployment of EUR 200 million from TEN-E to the Social Agenda,
– Razdelek 3: Državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravica:
- Heading 3: Citizenship, freedom, security and justice:
zavzame stališče, da so politike, ki se bodo financirale iz tega poglavja, zlasti svoboda, varnost in pravica, ter tudi mladina in kultura, zelo pomembne prednostne naloge za Evropski parlament; zato bi se moral globalni obseg proračunskih sredstev povečati za 1,3 milijarde EUR, od tega za + 1 milijardo EUR za temeljne pravice in boj proti kriminalu, 140 milijonov EUR za kulturo in 189 milijonov EUR za mlade,
takes the view that the policies to be financed under this heading, in particular Freedom, Security and Justice, as well as Youth and Culture, are high priorities for the European Parliament; therefore, the global volume of appropriations should be increased by EUR 1.3 billion, of which + EUR 1 billion for fundamental rights and the fight against crime, EUR 140 million for Culture, and EUR 189 million for Youth,
– Razdelek 4: EU kot svetovni partner (in SZVP):
- Heading 4: The EU as a global partner (and CFSP):
meni, da ambicije za razširjeno Unijo v naslednjem obdobju, zlasti za predpristopni instrument ter instrument o sosedstvu in partnerstvu, nujnost financiranja kriznih razmer in preoblikovanje zunanje politike iz osnutka Ustave omogočajo povečanje za 2,5 milijardi EUR in prerazporeditev 1,2 milijarde EUR; poudarja, da bi bilo povečanje za 900 milijonov EUR za SZVP na razpolago šele po sporazumu s Svetom o vlogi Evropskega parlamenta pri odločanju,
is of the opinion that the ambitions of the enlarged Union over the next period, in particular for Pre-Accession (IPA) and Neighbourhood and Partnership (ENPI) instruments, the need to finance crises, and the reshaping of foreign policy contained in the Constitution allow for an increase of EUR 2.5 billion and a redeployment of EUR 1.2 billion; underlines that the increase of EUR 900 million for the CFSP would only be made available after agreement with the Council on the role of the European Parliament in decision-making,
– Upravni izdatki:
- Administrative expenditure:
meni, da bi se morali upravni izdatki Komisije zmanjšati za 2,9 milijardi EUR v skladu s strogostjo, ki jo nalagajo nacionalne uprave, in ob upoštevanju novih oblik vodenja (agencije) ter upoštevanju tega, da nadaljnje širitve ne bi smele sistematično ustvarjati novih virov;
considers that the Commission's administrative expenditure should be reduced by EUR 2.9 billion in line with the rigour imposed on national administrations and bearing in mind the development of new forms of governance (agencies), considering that successive enlargements should not systematically generate new resources;
– Vidiki, povezani z Ustavo:
Aspects linked to the Constitution:
– Finančna uredba:
Financial Regulation:
je prepričan, da je treba načela razumnega upravljanja iz Finančne uredbe in njenih pravil o izvajanju pregledati zaradi lažjega izvajanja in pospešitve plačil (ali nadomestil) državam članicam; poziva Komisijo in Svet, da se dogovorita o ponovnem sprejetju določb zaradi lažjega izvajanja in preprostejših postopkov,
is convinced that the principles of sound management contained in the Financial Regulation and its implementing rules need to be reviewed to facilitate implementation and accelerate repayments (or reimbursements) to Member States; urges the Commission and the Council to agree on a recasting of the provisions which must facilitate implementation and simplify procedures,
– Upravno breme:
- Administrative Burden:
– Overitev s strani držav članic:
Certification by Member States: