natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da nekooperativen odnos Komisije v tej in drugih zadevah grozi, da bo izničil zaupanje državljanov v Komisijo in spodkopal zmožnost Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in Evropskega parlamenta, da ustrezno in uspešno nadzirata Komisijo, ter da je takšen odnos sam po sebi v nasprotju z načelom vladavine prava, na katerem je utemeljena EU;
Considers that the Commission's uncooperative attitude in this and other cases risks eroding citizens' trust in the Commission and undermining the ability of the European Ombudsman and the European Parliament to adequately and effectively supervise the Commission, and that it as such, runs counter to the very principle of the rule of law upon which the European Union is founded;
zahteva, naj se Komisija v odnosu do Evropskega parlamenta zaveže, da bo v prihodnosti izpolnjevala svojo dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja z Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic;
Demands that the Commission give an undertaking to the European Parliament that it will fulfil its duty of sincere cooperation with the European Ombudsman in future;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. novembra 2010 o 26. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije (2008) ( 2010/2076(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on the 26th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of European Union Law (2008) ( 2010/2076(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o oceni pilotnega projekta EU ( KOM(2010)0070 ),
having regard to the Report from the Commission entitled ‘EU Pilot Evaluation Report’ ( COM(2010)0070 ),
ob upoštevanju 25. letnega poročila Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti (2007) ( KOM(2008)0777 ),
having regard to the 25th Annual Report from the Commission on Monitoring the application of Community law (2007) ( COM(2008)0777 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov služb Komisije ( SEK(2009)1683 , SEK(2009)1684 , SEK(2009)1685 in SEK(2010)0182 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working documents SEC(2009)1683 , SEC(2009)1684 , SEC(2009)1685 and SEC(2010)0182 ,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. septembra 2007 z naslovom „Evropa rezultatov - uporaba prava skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 5 September 2007 entitled ‘A Europe of results – applying Community law’ ( COM(2007)0502 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. marca 2002 o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0141 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 March 2002 on Relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law ( COM(2002)0141 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o 23. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2005) UL C 184 E, 6.8.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on the Commission's 23rd Annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2005) OJ C 184 E, 6.8.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in Odbora za peticije ( A7-0291/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0291/2010 ),
obžaluje, da Komisija ni odgovorila na vprašanja, ki jih je postavil Parlament v dosedanjih resolucijah, zlasti v omenjeni resoluciji z dne 21. februarja 2008; ugotavlja, da ni bilo izboljšav glede preglednosti, še zlasti v zvezi s pilotnim projektom EU in vprašanjem človeških virov;
Regrets that the Commission has not responded to the issues raised by Parliament in its previous resolutions, in particular the aforementioned resolution of 21 February 2008; notes the lack of improvement with regard to transparency, particularly with reference to the ‘EU Pilot’ project and the issue of human resources;
ugotavlja, da poskuša Komisija prek pilotnega projekta EU okrepiti zaveze, sodelovanje in partnerstvo z državami članicami Poročilo o oceni pilotnega projekta EU, str.
Notes that through EU Pilot the Commission is aiming to increase ‘commitment, co-operation and partnership between the Commission and Member States’ EU Pilot Evaluation Report, p.
in v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi upravami preučuje, kako izvajati zakonodajo Evropske unije; meni, da ta pobuda ustreza novi potrebi, ki je nastala s sprejetjem Lizbonske pogodbe, in sicer po sodelovanju med vsemi institucijami Evropske unije v korist dobro delujoče Unije, ki v središče postavlja državljana; poudarja dolžnost Komisije iz člena 17 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, da „skrbi za uporabo Pogodb in ukrepov, ki jih institucije sprejmejo na njuni podlagi“;
and is considering, in close cooperation with national administrations, how to deal with the application of European Union law; considers that this initiative responds to the new need for cooperation between all Institutions of the European Union in the interests of a well functioning, citizen-focused Union following the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty; underlines the obligation on the Commission laid down in Article 17 TEU to ‘ensure the application of the Treaties, and of measures adopted by the institutions pursuant to them’;
ugotavlja, da se po eni strani zdi, kot da imajo državljani poglavitno vlogo pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja zakonodaje EU v praksi Sporočilo Komisije iz leta 2002, str.
Notes that on the one hand citizens are portrayed as having an essential role in ensuring compliance with EU law on the ground Commission 2002 Communication, p.
5: „Komisija je vedno priznavala ključno vlogo, ki jo pri odkrivanju kršitev prava Skupnosti igrajo pritožniki“.
5: ‘the Commission has regularly acknowledged the vital role played by the complainant in detecting infringements of Community law’.
, po drugi strani pa so v pilotnem projektu EU še v večji meri izključeni iz nadaljnjih postopkov; meni, da to ni v skladu s slovesnimi izjavami iz pogodb, da se „odločitve sprejemajo čim bolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani“ (člen 1 PEU), da institucije Unije „pri svojem delu kar najbolj upoštevajo načelo javnosti delovanja“ (člen 15 PDEU) in da „Unija pri vseh svojih dejavnostih upošteva načelo enakosti svojih državljanov, ki so deležni enake obravnave s strani njenih institucij“ (člen 9 PEU);
, whilst on the other – in EU Pilot – they are even further excluded from any subsequent procedure; considers that this is not in line with the Treaties' solemn declarations that ‘decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen’ (Article 1 TEU), that ‘the Union institutions ... shall conduct their work as openly as possible’ (Article 15 TFEU) and that ‘[I]n all its activities, the Union shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions’ (Article 9 TEU);
ugotavlja, da je Komisije za uspešno delovanje pilotnega projekta v praksi vzpostavila „zaupno podatkovno bazo“ Poročilo Komisije o oceni pilotnega projekta EU ( KOM(2010)0070 ), str.
Notes that in order to make the EU Pilot operational, the Commission has created a ‘confidential on-line database’ Report from the Commission ‘EU Pilot Evaluation Report’ COM(2010)0070 , p.
, ki služi za komuniciranje med službami Komisije in organi držav članic; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu omogoči pravi dostop do te podatkovne baze, da bo lahko opravljal svojo funkcijo nadzora nad tem, kako Komisija opravlja svojo funkcijo varuhinje Pogodb;
for communication between Commission services and Member State authorities; calls on the Commission to give Parliament meaningful access to that database in order to enable it to perform its role of scrutiny of the Commission's discharge of its role as guardian of the Treaties;
poudarja, da je dejavna vloga državljanov Evropske unije jasno navedena v Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, zlasti v zvezi z evropsko državljansko pobudo; meni, da je možnost, ki državljanom omogoča oblikovanje zakonodajnega programa, neposredno povezana tudi z njihovo sedanjo bistveno vlogo pri zagotavljanju pravilne uporabe in spoštovanja zakonodaje Evropske unije ter preglednosti in gotovosti postopkov;
Highlights that the active role of the citizens of the European Union is clearly stated in the Treaty on European Union, particularly with reference to the European Citizens' Initiative; considers that the possibility for citizens to set the legislative agenda is also directly connected with their current essential role in ensuring the correct application of, and compliance with, European Union law and the transparency and reliability of the related procedures;
je mnenja, da letna poročila Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije v sedanji obliki državljanom in drugim institucijam ne nudijo zadostnih informacij o resničnem stanju uporabe zakonodaje EU, saj Komisija navaja le uradne postopke, ki so bili sproženi proti državam članicam, ki zakonodaje EU niso prenesle v nacionalne pravne sisteme; meni, da bi bilo za državljane in Parlament zelo koristno, če bi bili obveščeni o tem, kdaj Komisija sproži postopek zaradi nepravilnega ali slabega prenosa zakonodaje EU in kakšne so podrobnosti kršitev;
Is of the opinion that, in their present form, the Commission's annual reports ‘on monitoring the application of European Union law’ do not give citizens or the other institutions sufficient information about the true state of application of EU law, as the Commission only makes reference to formal proceedings being opened against Member States that have not transposed EU law into their national legal systems; considers however that it would also be very much in the interest of citizens and Parliament to be informed when the Commission opens infringements for the incorrect or bad transposition of EU law, with details of those infringements also being supplied;
želi zagotoviti, da bi Komisija še naprej zagotavljala podrobne podatke o vseh vrstah kršitev in da bi bili vsi ti podatki neovirano dostopni Parlamentu, da bi ta lahko opravljal svojo funkcijo nadzora nad tem, kako Komisija opravlja vlogo varuhinje Pogodb; poudarja, da bi moralo biti primerjanje in razvrščanje teh podatkov v skladu s prejšnjimi letnimi poročili, da bi Parlamentu pomagali pri pripravi smiselnih ocen napredka Komisije, ne glede na to, ali je kršitev obravnavana prek pilotnega projekta EU ali s prvotnim postopkom za ugotavljanje kršitev;
Wishes to ensure that the Commission continues to produce detailed data on all types of infringement, and that the entirety of this data is made freely available to Parliament to enable it to perform its role of scrutiny of the Commission's discharge of its role as guardian of the Treaties; points out that the collation and categorisation of such data should be consistent with previous annual reports in order to assist Parliament in making meaningful assessments of the progress being made by the Commission, regardless of whether the infringement has been processed via the EU Pilot or the original infringement procedure;
ugotavlja, da zamude pri pravilni uporabi, prenosu in izvrševanju zakonodaje Evropske unije neposredno vplivajo na vsakdanje življenje državljanov in uživanje njihovih pravic, kar vodi v pravno negotovost in državljanom preprečuje, da bi v polni meri uživali koristi notranjega trga; opozarja na visoke stroške zaradi neupoštevanja in neuporabe zakonodaje EU ter posledično pomanjkanje zaupanja v evropske institucije;
Notes that delays in correctly applying, transposing and enforcing European Union law directly affect the daily lives of citizens and businesses and the enjoyment of their rights, resulting in legal uncertainty and preventing them from enjoying the full benefits of the internal market; highlights the high costs deriving from non-compliance with, and non-application of, EU law and the consequent lack of trust in the European Institutions;
obžaluje dejstvo, da nekatere države članice podcenjujejo pomen ustrezne in pravočasne uporabe prava Evropske unije; poziva jih, naj prenosu in uporabi namenijo primerno pozornost, da bi se izognili zamudam;
Deplores the fact that some Member States underestimate the value of the correct and timely application of EU law; urges them to give suitable priority to transposition and application, in order to avoid delays;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje postopkovna pravila v obliki uredbe v skladu z novo pravno podlago iz člena 298 PDEU, ki določa različne vidike postopkov zaradi kršitev, med njimi obvestila, roke, pravico do zaslišanja, dolžnost obrazložitve itd., da bi tako zaščitili pravice državljanov in preglednost; opozarja Komisijo, da predstavlja njeno sporočilo iz leta 2002 pomembno oporno točko pri oblikovanju omenjenih postopkovnih pravil;
Calls on the Commission to propose a ‘procedural code’ in the form of a regulation under the new legal basis of Article 298 TFEU, setting out the various aspects of the infringement procedure, including notifications, time-limits, the right to be heard, the obligation to state reasons, etc., in order to enforce citizens' rights and transparency; reminds the Commission that its 2002 Communication represents an important point of reference for the drafting of such a ‘procedural code’;
opozarja, da je Odbor za pravne zadeve pred nedavnim ustanovil delovno skupino za upravno pravo EU, da bi preučila, ali je mogoča kodifikacija upravnega prava EU in kaj bi takšen projekt vključeval v praksi; meni, da bi bilo treba zaključke te delovne skupine upoštevati pri razpravah o evropskem upravnem zakoniku;
Recalls that its Legal Affairs Committee recently launched a Working Group on EU administrative law with the aim of examining whether a codification of EU administrative law is possible and what such a project would involve in practice; considers that the conclusions of this Working Group should be taken into account when discussing a European administrative code;
opominja, da je Odbor za pravne zadevne nedavno soglasno sprejel pismo v podporo zahtevam vlagatelja peticije za uvedbo standardnega administrativnega postopka za nadzorovanje in izvajanje zakonodaje EU, ki bi upošteval diskrecijsko pravico Komisije, da odloči, kdaj in proti komu začne postopek zaradi kršitev, vendar bi to pravico omejeval z ustrezno upravno prakso
Recalls that its Legal Affairs Committee recently unanimously adopted a letter in support of a petitioner's views calling for a standard administrative procedure for supervising and enforcing EU law which, while respecting the Commission's discretion as to when and against whom to instigate proceedings, would restrict that discretion to within the boundaries of good administration practice
„Diskrecija je v sodobni vladi lahko nujno zlo; vseeno pa je absolutna diskrecija, skupaj z absolutnim pomanjkanjem preglednosti, v temeljnem nasprotju s pravno državo“, Poročilo Frassoni ( 2005/2150(INI) ) o 21. in 22. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2003 in 2004), obrazložitev, str.
‘Discretion may be a necessary evil in modern government; absolute discretion coupled with an absolute lack of transparency, however, is fundamentally contrary to the rule of law’ - Frassoni Report ( 2005/2150(INI) ) on the Commission's 21st and 22nd Annual Reports on Monitoring the application of Community law (2003 and 2004), p.
opozarja, da ima Komisija kot varuhinja Pogodb glavno vlogo pri zagotavljanju tega, da države članice pravilno in pravočasno izvajajo zakonodajo Evropske unije; spodbuja Komisijo, naj uporabi vse pristojnosti, ki so ji dodeljene s Pogodbami, zlasti nove določbe člena 260 PDEU v zvezi z neizpolnjevanjem obveznosti o obvestilu glede ukrepov o prenosu direktiv;
Recalls that the Commission has a primary role as the guardian of the Treaties in ensuring the correct and timely application of European Union law by the Member States; encourages the Commission to use all the competences granted to her by the Treaties, especially the new provisions of Article 260 TFEU concerning Member States' failure of notification of transposition measures of directives;
opozarja na resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo Sprejeta besedila na ta dan, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
Recalls the Parliament's resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission Texts adopted of that date, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
podpira ukrepe, ki jih je Komisija načrtovala za leto 2009 in kasneje, da bi se zagotovilo, da države članice spoštujejo evropsko zakonodajo, in zahteva možnost sodelovanja pri postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev v primerih, kjer peticije še niso zaključene, kot v primeru Kampanije, ki zadeva zakonodajo o odpadkih, in v primeru Španije, ki zadeva zakonodajo o upravljanju z vodami;
Endorses the measures planned by the Commission for 2009 and beyond to ensure compliance by Member States with European legislation and asks to be associated in the infringement procedures in cases where petitions are pending, such as in the cases of Campania on the subject of waste legislation and Spain on the subject of water management legislation.
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu posreduje ustrezne podatke za izvedbo analize o dodani vrednosti, ki jo pilotni projekt EU prinaša obstoječemu procesu obravnave primerov kršitev, da bi utemeljili razširitev projekta; meni, da bi morali ti podatki na primer Parlamentu omogočati, da preveri, ali obdobje desetih tednov, ki ga imajo države članice na voljo za razrešitev konkretnega primera, še dodatno zavlačuje postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki je že tako zelo dolgotrajen in časovno neomejen;
Calls on the Commission to supply Parliament with relevant data to enable an analysis to be made of the added value EU Pilot brings to the existing process of managing infringement files, which would justify extending the project further; considers that this data should, for example, allow Parliament to check whether the 10 weeks granted to a Member State to find a solution to a concrete case have not further delayed the initiation of an infringement procedure, the duration of which is already extremely lengthy and indeterminate;
s posebnim zanimanjem ugotavlja, da se je Komisija zavezala sistematičnemu ocenjevanju odgovorov na pritožbo, ki jih podajo države članice; poziva Komisijo, naj takšno oceno poda zelo natančno in po takojšnji preučitvi zadeve; poziva k pojasnitvi vloge pritožnika v procesu ocenjevanja;
Notes with particular interest the Commission's commitment to deliver systematically an evaluation of the reply to a complaint provided by a Member State; calls on the Commission to provide such an evaluation with the greatest attention and after prompt analysis of the dossier; calls for a clarification of the role of complainant in the evaluation process;
poziva Komisijo, naj nameni zadostna sredstva za to, da bo lahko popolnoma nadzorovala uporabo prava EU, sama sprožila postopke in oblikovala prednostne naloge za okrepljeno in bolj sistematično delovanje; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu, kot je to že večkrat zahteval, zagotovi jasne in izčrpne podatke o sredstvih, ki so v različnih generalnih direktoratih namenjena za obravnavo primerov kršitev, in o sredstvih, namenjenih pilotnemu projektu EU; opominja Komisijo, da se je Parlament zavezal k temu, da jo bo podpiral pri povišanju proračunskih sredstev za povečanje virov;
Asks the Commission to allocate sufficient resources to be able to monitor fully the implementation of EU law, initiate own cases and develop priorities for stronger and systematic actions; calls on the Commission to provide Parliament, as has been repeatedly requested, with clear and exhaustive data on the resources earmarked for processing infringement cases in the various Directorates-General and on those allocated to the EU Pilot project; reminds the Commission that Parliament committed itself to supporting the Commission via increased budget appropriations for increased resources;
poziva Komisijo, naj za učinkovitejšo uporabo prava Evropske unije preuči nove mehanizme, kot je postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, ki je predviden v direktivi o storitvah;
Asks the Commission to consider innovative mechanisms, such as the mutual evaluation procedure envisaged in the Services Directive, to ensure more effective application of EU law;
opominja na obljubo Sveta, da bo države članice spodbujal k oblikovanju in objavi razpredelnic, ki bodo prikazovale ujemanje med direktivami in nacionalnimi ukrepi za prenos zakonodaje; poudarja, da imajo takšne razpredelnice bistveno vlogo pri tem, da bo lahko Komisija učinkovito spremljala uporabo ukrepov v vseh državah članicah;
Recalls the Council's pledge to encourage Member States to draw up and publish tables illustrating the correlation between directives and national transposition measures; stresses that such tables are essential in order for the Commission to be able to monitor implementation measures in all Member States effectively;
poziva k okrepitvi vloge Parlamenta na področju uporabe, izvrševanja in nadzorovanja predpisov o enotnem trgu; podpira zamisel o letnem forumu o enotnem trgu;
Urges that Parliament's role in the areas of the application, enforcement and monitoring of single market rules be strengthened; supports the idea of an annual Single Market Forum;
poudarja pomen, ki ga imata za učinkovitejšo rabo instrumentov nadzora in primerjalnih analiz – ti so pomemben posredni disciplinski mehanizem – pregled notranjega trga in pregled stanja potrošniških trgov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo ustreza finančna sredstva in človeške vire za nadaljnji razvoj pregleda stanja potrošniških trgov;
Stresses the key role of the Internal Market Scoreboard and the Consumer Market Scoreboard in the context of the more effective use of monitoring and benchmarking instruments, which constitute an important indirect disciplinary mechanism; calls on the Commission and Member States to provide adequate financing and staffing so as to ensure that the Consumer Market Scoreboard can be further developed;
ugotavlja, da imajo nacionalna sodišča bistveno vlogo pri uporabi prava EU in v celoti podpira prizadevanja EU, da okrepi in uskladi usposabljanje za nacionalne sodnike, pravosodne delavce, uradnike in javne uslužbence v nacionalnih upravah;
Notes that the national courts play a vital role in applying European Union law and fully supports the EU's efforts to enhance and coordinate judicial training for national judges, legal professionals, officials and civil servants in the national administrations;
meni, da bi morala Komisija ob začetku postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev proti državi članici izdati tudi sporočilo o tem, da lahko prizadeti državljani zadevne države članice pred nacionalnimi sodišči ugovarjajo dejanju, s katerim je bila kršena zakonodaja EU;
Is of the opinion that when the Commission starts an infringement procedure against a Member State, it should also issue a communication stating that the act which infringed EU legislation can be challenged by the citizens affected in the Member State in question before their national courts;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 17. junija 2010 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov v civilnih in trgovskih zadevah; meni, da je zelo pomembno okrepiti izobraževanje pravosodnih organov, tudi z vidika akcijskega načrta za izvajanje stockholmskega programa;
Recalls its resolution of 17 June 2010 on judicial training in civil and commercial matters; takes the view that it is of fundamental importance that judicial training be enhanced, inter alia in the context of the Action Plan implementing the Stockholm Programme;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropske unije, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the European Ombudsman and the parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. novembra 2010 o javni radioteleviziji v digitalni dobi: prihodnost dvojnega sistema ( 2010/2028(INI)
European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on public service broadcasting in the digital era: the future of the dual system ( 2010/2028(INI) )