natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
38. odločno kritizira zavezo Komisije in Sveta, da bosta nadaljevala agendo o boljši zakonodaji, ki se je v okviru EU 2020 prekrstila v „pametno zakonodajo“, katere namen je omejiti regulativne pristojnosti javnih organov; poudarja, da težke posledice finančne krize niso edini dokaz, da je nujno potrebna temeljna okrepitev javne regulacije; poudarja, da je treba okrepiti obvezne trajnostne ocene o ciljih na področju okolja, sociale, spolov in enakosti ter oceniti stroške ukrepanja in neukrepanja; poudarja, da morajo imeti države članice pravico, da vzpostavijo nadzor cen, da bi prilagodile naraščajoče cene osnovnih dobrin;
Strongly criticises the Commission's and the Council's commitment to continue with the 'better regulation' agenda, newly baptised 'smart regulation' in the framework of EU 2020, which aims at limiting the regulatory capacity of the public authorities; underlines that not only the bitter results of the financial crisis have demonstrated the urgency of a fundamental strengthening of public regulation; points out the need to strengthen compulsory sustainability assessments on environment, social, gender and equality objectives and assess costs of action and inaction; underlines that member states must have the right to establish price controls in order to adjust rising basic goods prices;
14.6.2010 B7-0355/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0355/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o potrebni krepitvi gospodarskega upravljanja
on the need for strengthened economic governance
PE441.937v01-00 B7‑0355/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o potrebni krepitvi gospodarskega upravljanja
PE441.937v01-00 B7‑0355/2010 European Parliament resolution on the need for strengthened economic governance
– ob upoštevanju ocene Komisije o lizbonski strategiji (SEK (2010)114),
– having regard to the Commission’s evaluation of the Lisbon Strategy (SEC(2010)114),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Evropskega sveta z naslovom Sedem korakov za evropsko strategijo za rast in delovna mesta,
– having regard to the European Council document entitled ‘Seven steps to deliver on the European strategy for growth and jobs’,
A. ker bi morala strategija Evropa 2020 spodbujati gospodarsko rast in ustvarjati delovna mesta, saj so štiriodstotni padec BDP, upad industrijske proizvodnje in skupaj več kot 23 milijonov brezposelnih žensk in moških socialno in gospodarsko vprašanje,
A. whereas the EU 2020 strategy should promote economic growth and create jobs, whereas the 4% drop in GDP, falling industrial production and a total of more than 23 million unemployed women and men represent a social and economic challenge,
C. ker morajo države članice povečati gospodarsko storilnost z uvedbo strukturnih reform, da bi zmanjšale javno porabo in birokracijo, povečale odgovornost državljanov, spodbudile podjetništvo in inovacije, prilagodile zakonodajo malim in srednje velikim podjetjem ter omogočile ljudem, da bi čim bolje izkoristili svoje zmogljivosti in ne bi bili več odvisni od socialne pomoči,
C. whereas Member States should increase their economic performance by introducing structural reforms in order to reduce public expenditure, decrease bureaucracy, increase the self-responsibility of citizens, encourage entrepreneurship and innovation, make legislation more SME-friendly and provide people with the opportunity to maximise their potential instead of being dependent on social welfare,
1. meni, da je dogovor o ustanovitvi evropskega finančnega stabilizacijskega mehanizma z 9. maja, da bi pomagali državam evroobmočja in tistim zunaj njega, ki imajo finančne težave, odločilni trenutek v evropski zgodovini, vendar obžaluje, da so evropski snovalci politike izgubili več mesecev in milijarde evrov, ker niso prej odločno ukrepali;
Considers that the agreement reached on the 9th of May to establish a European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism to help both eurozone and non-eurozone countries in financial difficulties was a crucial moment in European history, but regrets that European policymakers have lost months and billions of euros as a result of in not taking decisive action earlier;
3. opominja Komisijo in države članice, da bo Evropski parlament moral dati svoje soglasje, če bosta Komisija in Svet želela povečati reševalni sklad na mednarodnih kapitalskih trgih;
Reminds the Commission and the Member States that the European Parliament will have to give its approval in case the Commission and Council want to raise the bailout fund on the international capital markets;
5. pozdravlja predloge Komisije za srednje in dolgoročno okrepitev upravljanja evroobmočja, da bi preprečili ponovitev sedanje krize valute;
Welcomes the Commission proposals for strengthening the management of the eurozone in the medium and long-term to avoid any repetition of the current currency crisis;
15. meni, da bi morale države članice v tesnem sodelovanju s Komisijo pripraviti akcijske načrte, v katerih bi upoštevale evropski kodeks za doseganje konvergence z največjimi in najmanjšimi vrednostmi, ki naj se uporabljajo pri določenih makroekonomskih vidikih njihovega gospodarstva; ta kodeks pripravi Evropska komisija, sprejme pa ga Evropski svet;
Takes the view that the Member States, in close cooperation with the European Commission, should draft national action plans respecting a European code of convergence with maximum and minimum values to be applied to certain macro-economic aspects of their economies; this Code of Convergence is to be drafted by the European Commission and adopted by the European Council;
Evropski proračun ne odraža ambicioznosti, ki je bila prikazana v sporočilu Komisije o Evropi 2020
The European budget does not reflect the same level of ambition as displayed in the Commissio n Communication on Europe 2020
20. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj junija predloži občutno spremembo evropskega proračuna pri pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira, da bi dvignila stopnjo ambicioznosti in omogočila uspeh strategije Evropa 2020;
Calls on the European Commission to come forward with an ambitious overhaul of the European budget in the revision of the multiannual financial framework in June to raise the level of ambition to make the Europe 2020 strategy a success;
14.6.2010 B7-0356/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Sveta in Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0356/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o gospodarskem upravljanju
on economic governance
PE441.938v01-00 B7‑0356/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o gospodarskem upravljanju
PE441.938v01-00 B7‑0356/2010 European Parliament resolution on economic governance
A. ker mora strategija EU 2020 stopnjevati gospodarsko rast ter ustvarjati konkurenčnost in delovna mesta, rast BDP pa naj bi spodbudila industrijsko proizvodnjo in odpiranje novih delovnih mest,
A. whereas the EU 2020 strategy must push the economic growth and create competitiveness and jobs, with again growth GDP pushing industrial production and creating new employment,
D. ker je sedanja gospodarska in finančna kriza v nekaterih državah članicah nastala zaradi nespoštovanja pravil pakta stabilnosti in rasti,
D. whereas the current economic and financial crisis in certain Member States is due to the non respect of the rules of Growth and Stability Pact,
E. ker bi morale države članice povečati ekonomski učinek, zato pa uvesti strukturne reforme, s katerimi bi zmanjšale javno porabo, spodbudile gospodarstvo, nudile malim in srednjim podjetjem več možnosti za razvoj ter uporabljale pozitiven pristop, ker je to boljši način za doseganje gospodarske rasti in zagotavljanje delovnih mest za naše državljane,
E. whereas Member States should increase their economic performance by introducing structural reform reducing public expenditure, pushing economy, giving SMEs more possibility to develop and to have low-friendly approach considering that is the better way to help the economic growth and provide pour citizens with jobs,
1. pozdravlja sklep Sveta o daljnosežnem sporazumu za zagotovitev stabilnosti evra in vzpostavitev novega evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo, sestavljenega iz celovitega svežnja ukrepov;
Welcomes the decision taken by the Council of a far reaching agreement to ensure the stability of euro and to install a new European Financial Stabilisation mechanism that consists on a comprehensive package;
6. pozdravlja obsežne načrte grške vlade, da posodobi državo, odpravi toge strukture, se bori proti korupciji, izdela zanesljiv statistični sistem, zmanjša proračunski primanjkljaj, poveča učinkovitost sistema pobiranja davkov in spremeni strukturo javnih izdatkov; vztraja, da mora Grčija pri tem čim prej doseči rezultate;
Welcomes the Greek government’s wide-ranging plans to modernise the country, overcome structural rigidities, combat corruption, create a reliable statistical system, reduce the budget deficit, increase the efficiency of the tax-collecting system and review the structure of the public expenses; insists on Greece to deliver results as soon as possible;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj na območju evra uvede okrepljen, samodejni mehanizem sankcij (na primer navajanje in izpostavljanje držav, odvzem glasovalne pravice, zmanjšanje subvencij iz strukturnih skladov in finančne kazni), ki bi države članice silil k upoštevanju pravil iz pakta stabilnosti in rasti;
Urges the Commission to include an enforced sanctioning mechanism in an automatic way (e.g. naming and shaming, withdrawing of voting power, reduced subsidies from structural funds and financial penalties) within the eurozone in order to force Member States to respect the rules of the Stability and Growth Pact;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj predloži oceno makroekonomskega vpliva svežnja ukrepov za ohranitev finančne stabilnosti v Evropski uniji ter predstavi sporočilo o izvedljivosti, tveganjih in prednostih izdaje evroobveznic;
Asks the Commission to come up with a macro-economic impact assessment of the package of measures to preserve financial stability in the European Union and come up with a communication on the feasibility, the risks and advantages of issuing Eurobonds;
23. meni, da bo treba širše smernice ekonomskih politik in priporočila za posamezne države pripraviti dovolj podrobno, če naj bodo dejansko učinkovite; poudarja, kako pomembna je močnejša povezava med instrumenti pakta stabilnosti in rasti, makroekonomskimi instrumenti in nacionalnimi programi reform strategije EU 2020, ki jih je treba predstaviti časovno usklajeno, vanje pa vključiti primerjavo med nacionalnimi proračuni glede porabe v različnih kategorijah; države članice morajo svoje gospodarske politike obravnavati ne le kot zadevo skupnega pomena, ampak jih morajo tudi usklajevati tako, da se medsebojno ne bodo izključevale; opozarja na okrepljeno vlogo širših smernic ekonomskih politik;
Takes the view that the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines (BEPGs) and the country specific recommendations will need to be detailed enough to have a real effect; Stresses the importance of a stronger link between the instruments of the Stability and Growth Pact macro economic instruments and the EU 2020 National Reform Programmes by presenting them in coherent way time-wise and including enhanced comparability of national budgets as regards spending in different categories; the Member states not only have considered their economic policy as a matter of common interest, but they have to coordinate them in a way that they do not cancel out each other; reminds of the enhanced role of the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines;
25. meni, da je treba povečati pristojnosti Eurostata, tudi z dodelitvijo preiskovalnih pooblastil; meni, da morajo biti odprte in pregledne statistične informacije pogoj za dostopanje do strukturnih skladov; Komisija mora prevzeti odgovornost za ocenjevanje statističnih podatkov, s čimer bo preverjala, ali država članica izpolnjuje zahtevano obveznost in oceno;
Considers that the powers of EUROSTAT should be enhanced, including investigative powers conferred to EUROSTAT; considers that open and transparent statistical information should be a precondition for accessing structural funds; Commission must take the responsibility to evaluate the statistic in order to decide if a Member State complies with requested obligation and assessment;
29. obžaluje, da Parlament kot predstavniško telo državljanov Evrope ni bil vključen v posvetovanje o kazalcih, ki so osnova za nacionalni program reform EU 2020; poziva Svet, naj odloži svojo odločitev in se najprej posvetuje z njim;
Regrets that Parliament as representative of the citizens of Europe is not consulted on the indicators that are the basis of the EU 2020 National Reform Programme; ask the Council to postpone their decision and to consult first with Parliament;
32. večletni finančni okvir: poudarja, da je treba pri sedanji reviziji večletnega finančnega okvira upoštevati sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 15. in 16. decembra 2005 in ga uskladiti z zahtevami Lizbonske pogodbe, da se s tem zagotovi financiranje pobud iz strategije EU 2020 ter raznih drugih pobud in političnih obvez, sprejetih v sedanjem in prihodnjem večletnem finančnem okviru;
MFF: Underlines the importance of the revision of the current multi-annual financial framework (MFF) to comply with the conclusions of the European Council of 15-16 December 2005 and bring it into line with the requirements of the Lisbon Treaty in order to provide financing for the initiatives outlined in the EU 2020 strategy as well as the various initiatives and political commitments which were taken during the current and next MFF;
34. poudarja, da je s proračunskega vidika nemogoče jasno določiti finančne posledice strategije EU 2020 za posamezne proračunske vrstice, iz katerih se črpajo sredstva za nove vodilne pobude; vseeno se obvezuje, da si bo za to dejavno prizadeval že v okviru proračuna za leto 2011, da bi se že na tej stopnji zagotovilo ustrezno financiranje strategije EU 2020;
Stresses that it is impossible to identify clearly, from a budgetary point of view, the financial implications of the EU 2020 strategy of the exact budget lines that are covered by the new flagship initiatives; expresses its commitment, however, to actively work to this direction already in the framework of the 2011 Budget, in order to ensure at this stage an adequate financing of the EU 2020 strategy;
14.6.2010 B7-0357/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0357/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o gospodarskem upravljanju EU
on EU economic governance
PE441.939v01-00 B7‑0357/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o gospodarskem upravljanju EU
PE441.939v01-00 B7‑0357/2010 European Parliament resolution on EU economic governance
– ob upoštevanju sklepov spomladanskega srečanja Evropskega sveta na vrhu z dne 26. marca 2010 o strategiji Evropa 2020 in gospodarskem upravljanju,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council's Spring Summit of 26 March 2010 on Europe 2020 and economic governance,
– ob upoštevanju izjave voditeljev držav in vlad območja evra z dne 7. maja 2010,
– having regard to the statement of the heads of state or government of the euro area of 7 May 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov izrednega srečanja Sveta za gospodarske in finančne zadeve z dne 18. maja in 8. junija 2010,
– having regard to the results of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council's meetings of 18 May and 8 June 2010,
A. ker se je Evropski svet konec leta 2009 dogovoril o strategiji za izhod iz krize in proti 20 državam članicam začel postopke zaradi čezmernega primanjkljaja, po katerih morajo do leta 2013/2014 ali prej proračunski primanjkljaj zmanjšati pod 3 % BDP; ker so številne države članice že začele varčevati pri plačah in občutno oklestile javno porabo, kar bo povzročilo zmanjšanje plač v javnem sektorju in pokojnin ter zmanjšanje obsega javnih storitev in njihovo privatizacijo, sprejele pa so tudi ukrepe za dvig DDV, socialnih prispevkov in obvezne starosti za upokojitev;
A. whereas at the end of 2009 the European Council agreed on an 'exit strategy' and launched deficit procedures against 20 Member States, requiring them to cut budget deficits under 3 % of GDP by 2013/14 or earlier; whereas many Member States have already launched attacks on wages and implemented severe cuts in public spending, driving down public sector wages and pensions, downsizing and privatising public services, as well as measures to raise VAT, social security contributions and the statutory retirement age,
B. ker strategija Evropske unije za izhod iz krize in ravnanje finančnega sektorja kažeta na globoko zakoreninjen cinizem: primanjkljaji so visoki, javni dolg pa se povečuje, zlasti zato, ker so vlade reševale finančni sektor pred posledicami špekulacij in škode, ki jo je povzročil gospodarstvu; ker se finančni trgi zdaj obračajo prav na vlade, ki so jih rešile, te pa prelagajo breme odplačevanja javnega dolga upnikom iz istega finančnega sektorja na delavce, upokojence in druge, katerih delovna mesta, plače, socialni prispevki in pravice so ogroženi;
B. whereas the EU 'exit strategy' and the behaviour of the financial sector expose a deep seated cynicism: deficits are high and public debt is soaring mainly because governments were saving the financial sector from the results of its speculation and the damage it was inflicting on the economy; whereas financial markets now turn on the very same governments that rescued them in the first place, and governments put the burden to repay public debt to the same financial sector creditors on the ordinary population of workers, pensioners etc. whose jobs, wages, social benefits and rights are under attack,
C. ker je Komisija v svoji oceni programov stabilnosti in konvergence 24 držav članic Evropske unije z dne 17. in 24. marca 2010 ter 14. aprila 2010 večino teh držav pozvala k večjemu zmanjšanju javne porabe in k več strukturnim reformam; ker Komisija predlaga uvedbo mehanizma za še strožji nadzor primanjkljaja pri srednjeročnem proračunskem načrtovanju držav članic; ker sklepi spomladanskega srečanja Sveta o gospodarskem upravljanju spodbujajo tudi k uporabi člena 136 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije kot instrumenta za strožji nadzor nad proračunom ter k osredotočanju na pereče izzive konkurenčnosti in na gibanje plačilne bilance;
C. whereas the Commission in its assessment of the stability and convergence programmes of 24 EU Member States of 17 and 24 March 2010 and 14 April 2010 urged most of them to go for tougher public spending cuts and more 'structural reforms'; whereas the Commission proposes to establish mechanisms for even tighter deficit oversight of Member States' medium-term budgetary planning; whereas the Spring Council's conclusions on 'economic governance' also advocate to use Article 136 of the Treaty (TFEU) as an instrument to achieve tighter budgetary surveillance and to focus on the 'pressing challenges of competitiveness and balance of payments developments',
1. poudarja, da sado-monetaristična strategija izhoda iz krize EU državam članicam ne bo omogočila konsolidacije javnih financ, saj bo oslabila samodejne stabilizatorje, kot so socialna zaščita in javne naložbe, in znižala plače, s tem pa zmanjšala notranje povpraševanje in davčne prihodke; opozarja, da bo gospodarsko upravljanje EU, kot ga predlaga Svet, pripeljalo do nazadovanja na socialnem področju, še bolj oslabilo gospodarstvo ter omajalo evropsko povezovanje in demokracijo;
Highlights that the sado-monetarist EU exit strategy will not enable Member States to achieve fiscal consolidation, as automatic stabilisers such as social protection and public investment will be weakened by it, wages depressed and in return internal demand and tax revenues diminished; points out that 'EU economic governance' as proposed by the Council along these lines will lead to social regression, a further weakened economy and the de-stabilisation of European integration and democracy;
5. predlaga, da bi del naložbenih programov načrta za oživitev obravnaval predvsem tiste industrijske panoge, ki jih je najbolj prizadela kriza, da bi upoštevali potrebo po polni in dostojni zaposlitvi: preusmeritev avtomobilske industrije k trajnostnim prometnim storitvam, razširitev železniških omrežij in nudenje celovitih in obsežnih regionalnih železniških storitev (železniški program Evropa 2025), spodbujanje zelenega ladjedelstva in stabilizacija jeklarske industrije v tem smislu; vztraja, da morajo EU in države članice temu preusmerjanju dodati ukrepe za ohranjanje delovnih mest, usposabljanje, preusposabljanje in razvoj usposobljenosti ter varne prehode v zaposlovanju za delavce v teh panogah;
Suggests that a part of the recovery plan's investment programmes should particularly address industry branches most hit by the crisis, in order to comply with the need to achieve full and decent employment: re-conversion of the car industry towards sustainable transport services, extension of railway networks and supply of spatially inclusive and comprehensive regional train services (Programme Rail Europe 2025), promotion of 'green' shipbuilding and stabilisation of the steel industry in that context; insists that the EU and the Member States should accompany such re-conversion by measures for job retention, training, re-training and skills development, and secure employment transitions for workers in the industries concerned;
7. meni, da mora upravljanje gospodarstva EU temeljito obravnavati sedanja neravnovesja med tekočimi računi v EU-27, saj imajo države v južni in vzhodni Evropi visoke primanjkljaje, Nemčija, Avstrija in Nizozemska pa visoke presežke; poudarja, da morajo države z visokim presežkom preusmeriti svoj gospodarski razvoj v okrepitev notranjega povpraševanja in domačega gospodarstva; predlaga ustanovitev mehanizma za „klirinško unijo“ v EU-27, ki bi države s presežkom obvezal, da bi državam s primanjkljajem plačevale pozitivne obrestne mere, kar bi slednjim omogočilo vlaganje v posodobitev proizvodnje, storitev in infrastrukture, povečanje produktivnosti in zmanjšanje sedanjih primanjkljajev na tekočem računu;
Considers that the current account imbalances within the EU-27 – countries with high current account deficits in southern and eastern Europe, countries with high current account surpluses such as Germany, Austria and the Netherlands – must be thoroughly addressed by EU economic governance; highlights that the surplus countries need to shift their economic development to strengthen internal demand and their domestic economy; proposes to establish a ‘clearing union’ mechanism within the EU-27 obliging the surplus countries to pay positive interest rates to the deficit countries, thus allowing those to invest in the modernisation of production, services and infrastructure, increase productivity and bring down current account deficits;
9. poziva Svet, naj razširi mandat Evropske investicijske banke in Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj, da bodo njune politike posojil lahko krile ves obseg novega evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva (na primer tudi trajnostno industrijsko politiko in tako dalje);
Calls on the Council to broaden the mandate of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), so that their lending policies can cover the whole range of the new European Recovery Plan (e.g. including sustainable industrial policy etc.);