natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da se uspešnost in učinkovitost ureditev za upravljanje in izvajanje MEDA izboljšujeta, vendar še vedno nista povsem zadovoljivi;
Underlines that the effectiveness and efficiency of MEDA management and implementation arrangements is improving but is still not fully satisfactory;
ugotavlja, da so se v smislu finančne učinkovitosti sredstva programa MEDA II v celoti črpala hitreje kot pri MEDA I: v podobnem obdobju kot v času MEDA I je bila 30 % plačilna raven dosežena v povprečno treh letih, medtem ko je bilo v času MEDA II to doseženo v dveh letih;
Notes that in terms of financial efficiency the total MEDA II Programme has disbursed funds faster than did MEDA I: over a similar period as during MEDA I it took on average three years to reach a 30% payment level, whereas during MEDA II this was reduced to two years;
OBVEZNOSTI/ČRPANJE SREDSTEV MEDA 1995-2005
MEDA COMMITMENTS/DISBURSEMENTS 1995-2005
1995 do 1999
1995 to 1999
2000 do 2006
2000 to 2006
1995 do 2006
1995 to 2006
Skupaj dvostranski
Total bilateral
Skupni znesek, ki je na voljo v skladu z MEDA I in II = 3 424 + 5 350 = 8 774 milijonov EUR.
The total amount available under MEDA I and II = 3 424 + 5 350 = EUR 8 774 million.
Iz tega zneska je bilo porabljenih približno 852 milijonov EUR za Turčijo med letoma 1996 in 2002 (manjše razlike so posledica zaokroževanja)
From this an amount of about EUR 852 million was committed for Turkey during 1996 to 2002 (minor differences are due to rounding).
ugotavlja, da se je po navedbah posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča 5/2006 upravljanje programa MEDA s strani Komisije od prvih let delovanja opazno izboljšalo in se lahko šteje kot zadovoljivo ob upoštevanju postopkovnih in zunanjih omejitev, prizadevanje v okviru programa pa je sčasoma omogočilo bolj enakomerno porazdelitev sredstev, obdobja priprave so se skrajšala, črpanje sredstev pa se je znatno povečalo;
Notes that according to the Court of Auditors' Special Report 5/2006 the Commission's management of the MEDA Programme has clearly improved since the early years and can be considered as satisfactory taking into account procedural and external constraints, and programming efforts have resulted in a more even allocation of resources over time; preparation periods are becoming shorter and disbursements have increased significantly;
poudarja dejstvo, da rezultati srednjeročne ocene programa MEDA II in ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v zvezi z uspešnostjo in učinkovitostjo izvajanja in upravljanja, in sicer, da "se izboljšujeta, vendar še nista zadovoljivi", sami po sebi ne morejo razložiti razlik v učinkovitosti MEDA v posameznih državah in programih; ugotavlja, da imajo zunanji dejavniki (finančna ureditev, upravljanje, kulturni dejavniki) pomembno vlogo pri razlagi ugotovljenih razlik pri hitrosti doseganja sprememb in vzorcih črpanja finančnih sredstev; poziva Komisijo, da te dejavnike upošteva pri načrtovanju, izvajanju, spremljanju in ocenjevanju;
Stresses the fact that the findings of the mid-term evaluation of the MEDA II Programme and of the Court of Auditors on implementation and management effectiveness and efficiency – "improving but still not fully satisfactory" – cannot by themselves explain the differences in MEDA performance between countries and programmes; notes that external factors (financial regulation, governance, cultural factors) clearly play an important role in explaining the observed differences in speed of change and in financial disbursement patterns; invites the Commission to take these factors into consideration in its planning and in implementation, monitoring and evaluation;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da namenita prednost barcelonskemu procesu kot gonilni sili za določanje politike v okviru instrumenta evropske sosedske politike (obdobje 2007-2013) z bolj učinkovitimi politikami in ukrepi, ki upoštevajo posebne izzive in težave sredozemskih partnerskih držav;
Invites the Commission and the Council to give high priority to the Barcelona Process as a driving force for policy setting under the European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument (period 2007-2013) with more efficient policies and measures having regard to the specific challenges and problems of the Mediterranean partner countries;
opozarja, da mora v skladu s členom 15 Uredbe MEDA II Komisija skupaj z EIB izdelati celovito ocenjevalno poročilo o pomoči, ki jo je že dodelila sredozemskim partnerjem, vključno z učinkovitostjo programov, pripraviti naknadno oceno projektov in glavnih področij posredovanja, preveriti napredek pri izvajanju ter predložiti letno poročilo Parlamentu in Svetu najpozneje do 30. junija naslednjega leta; v zvezi s to obveznostjo poziva Komisijo, da ga seznani s sedanjim stanjem priprave takšnih naknadnih ocen po posameznih projektih in področjih ter jih skupaj z zadnjimi letnimi poročili pošlje Parlamentu in Svetu;
Recalls that according to Article 15 of the MEDA II Regulation the Commission has, together with the EIB, to produce an overall evaluation report of the assistance already provided to the Mediterranean partners, including the effectiveness of the programmes, evaluate ex post their respective projects and main sectors of intervention and examine progress in implementation, and submit to the Parliament and the Council an annual report, no later than 30 June of the following year; with respect to this obligation, invites the Commission to inform it of the current stage of elaboration of such ex post evaluations by individual projects and sectors, and to transmit these and the latest annual reports to the Parliament and the Council;
poziva Komisijo, da upošteva dejavnike, ki prispevajo k izboljšanju prihodnjega upravljanja:
Urges the Commission to take into consideration the factors contributing to the improvement of future management:
povečanje števila projektov in programov, hkrati z oceno njihove vsebine, učinka in kakovosti;
an increase in the number of projects and programmes, in parallel with the evaluation of their content, their effect and their qualitative value;
večji delež proračunske pomoči v celotnem programu;
a larger share of budget support in the total programme;
celoten pozitiven vpliv prenosa odgovornosti v zvezi s pripravo in izvajanjem projekta s sedeža Komisije na njene delegacije na terenu (vplivi decentralizacije);
the overall positive effect of devolution of responsibilities from the Commission's headquarters to its delegations in the field in relation to project preparation and implementation (effects of decentralisation);
sodelovanje in učinkovita udeležba lokalnih organov;
the cooperation and effective participation of the local authorities;
izboljšanje sodelovanja med sredozemskimi partnerskimi državami (jug–jug) za dosego cilja regionalne razsežnosti;
the enhancement of cooperation between the Mediterranean partner countries (South-South) for the achievement of the objective of regional dimension;
verjame, da druge izboljšave vključujejo bolj sistematično spremljanje in ocenjevanje ter okrepljen dialog in usklajevanje z lokalnimi sodelavci in drugimi donatorji; poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi bolj redne mehanizme spremljanja, prilagojene vsaki vrsti projekta;
Believes that other improvements include more systematic monitoring and evaluation and more intensive dialogue and coordination with local counterparts and other donors; invites the Commission to secure more regular monitoring mechanisms adapted to each type of project;
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da mora Komisija:
Agrees with the Court of Auditors on the need for the Commission to:
zagotoviti nemoten in hiter prehod k novim državnim programom, da se izogne negativnim posledicam za izvajanje v prihodnosti,
ensure a smooth and quick transition towards the new country programmes to avoid negative consequences for future implementation,
v dokumentih novih državnih programov bolj jasno opredeliti svoje strateške cilje in vzpostaviti ustrezne kazalnike, da se omogoči boljše spremljanje in ocenjevanje posledic,
define more clearly in the new country programming documents its strategic objectives and establish appropriate indicators, to allow for better monitoring and evaluation of impact,
še naprej osredotočati svojo pomoč na omejeno število področij posredovanja, da zagotovi skladnost in možnost upravljanja programov,
continue to focus its support on a limited number of intervention areas to ensure coherence and to keep the programmes manageable,
nadaljevati z iskanjem najboljših praks pri upravljanju projektov, da se izogne zamudam;
continue to search for best practices in managing projects to avoid delays.
podpira 19 priporočil vmesne ocene programa MEDA II v zvezi z vlogo, uspešnostjo in učinkovitostjo upravljanja programa MEDA;
Supports the 19 recommendations of the mid-term evaluation of the MEDA II Programme regarding the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the management of the MEDA Programme;
poziva Komisijo, da ohrani ravnotežje med uspešnostjo pomoči v smislu trajnostnega institucionalnega razvoja ter učinkovitostjo pomoči v smislu absorpcijske sposobnosti in hitrosti črpanja finančnih sredstev, preglednosti in nadzora upravljanja proračuna;
Calls on the Commission to maintain a balance between the effectiveness of assistance in terms of sustainable institutional development and the efficiency of assistance in terms of absorption capacity and financial disbursement speeds, transparency and budget management control;
poziva Komisijo, da nadalje izboljša kakovost strateškega in okvirnega načrtovanja z vlaganjem v središča znanja MEDA za poglobljeno razumevanje vidikov pogojev izvajanja in institucionalne hitrosti sprememb v državah MEDA, kot to predlaga vmesna ocena v smislu spremembe uredbe (Evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva);
Calls on the Commission to further improve the quality of strategic and indicative programming by investing in a MEDA knowledge centre for in-depth understanding of implementation conditions and the institutional speed of changes aspects in the MEDA countries, as suggested by the mid-term evaluation in view of the revision of the regulation (European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument);
meni, da je treba gospodarske vidike partnerstva preusmeriti proti socialni koheziji in trajnostnemu gospodarskemu razvoju, vendar meni tudi, da je izpolnjevanje vseh ciljev barcelonskega procesa pomembno za celotno regijo; zato poziva Komisijo, da nameni čim več pozornosti vprašanjem vzpostavljanja institucij, pravne države, svobode tiska, človekovih pravic in enakosti spolov;
Takes the view that the economic aspect of the partnership must be redirected towards social cohesion and sustainable economic development but also considers that pursuing all objectives of the Barcelona Process is important for the whole region; therefore invites the Commission to pay as much attention as possible to the issues of institution building, the rule of law, freedom of the press, human rights and gender equality;
poziva Komisijo, da spodbudi in obveže svoje partnerje v državah MEDA k izpolnjevanju tudi vseh negospodarskih ciljev programa MEDA in sistematičnemu spremljanju kazalnikov v zvezi s temi cilji;
Invites the Commission to motivate and commit its partners in the MEDA countries to pursue also all non-economic objectives of the MEDA Programme, and to systematically monitor indicators concerning these objectives;
meni, da je glede na gospodarski položaj sredozemskih partnerskih držav potrebna precejšnja podpora za infrastrukturne projekte, zlasti na področjih prevoza, zdravstva, stanovanj in oskrbe s pitno vodo;
Considers that, in view of the Mediterranean partner countries' economic situation, significant support is required for infrastructure projects, particularly in the fields of transport, health, housing and the supply of drinking water;
priporoča, da Komisija poveča zmogljivost upravljanja projektov manjšega obsega, ki temeljijo na pobudah civilne družbe, ter priporoča sprejetje ukrepov za izboljšanje gospodarske rasti in skladnosti, zlasti z uporabo posojil in mikro posojil s strani majhnih in srednje velikih podjetij v partnerskih državah;
Recommends that the Commission increase the capacity to manage small-scale projects based on civil society initiatives and recommends the adoption of measures to enhance economic growth and cohesion, in particular through the use of loans and micro-credit facilities by small and medium-sized enterprises in the partner countries;
poudarja, da spoštovanje načela enakosti spolov pomeni spoštovanje človekovih pravic in demokratičnosti ter zahteva, da se vključevanje enakosti spolov izrecno horizontalno vključi v barcelonski proces in v tri stebre partnerstva;
Stresses that respect of the principle of gender equality is a matter of respect of human rights and of democracy and calls for gender mainstreaming to be explicitly incorporated horizontally in the Barcelona Process and in the three pillars of the partnership;
poudarja dejstvo, da imajo ženske pomembno vlogo pri gospodarskem in družbenem razvoju partnerskih držav, ter poziva Komisijo, da poroča o izpolnjevanju in učinkoviti uporabi finančnih obveznosti, določenih v programu MEDA za podporo dejavnega sodelovanja žensk v gospodarskem in družbenem življenju (izobraževanje, usposabljanje, zaposlovanje);
Underlines the fact that women play a significant role in the economic and social development of the partner countries and calls on the Commission to report on the fulfilment and effective application of the financial commitments laid down in the MEDA Programme to support women's active participation in economic and social life (education, training, employment);
opozarja na pomen izboljševanja dopolnjevanja in skladnosti med MEDA, drugimi zunanjimi ukrepi EU in dejavnostmi EIB;
Recalls the significance of enhancing the complementarity and coherence between MEDA, other EU external actions and EIB activities;
meni, da s pomočjo medparlamentarnega dialoga ima lahko Evro-mediteranska parlamentarna skupščina ključno vlogo pri izboljševanju Evro-mediteranskega partnerstva, ker naknadno razvija trdne medparlamentarne odnose, določa politične usmeritve z izjavami in resolucijami ter spodbuja sistematičen politični nadzor in ocenjevanje izvajanja programa MEDA;
Considers that the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly could play through inter-parliamentary dialogue a key role in the improvement of the Euro-Mediterranean partnership, as it subsequently develops stable inter-parliamentary relations, giving political orientations through its declarations and resolutions and promoting a systematic political control and evaluation of the implementation of the MEDA Programme;
pozdravlja ustanovitev FEMIP leta 2002 v okviru EIB, vendar poziva k nadaljnjim razpravam med državami članicami EU in njihovimi Evro-mediteranskimi partnerji s ciljem razviti to pobudo v pristen finančni instrument za sodelovanje, s katerim se je mogoče odzivati na nove potrebe in izzive javnega in zasebnega sektorja;
Welcomes the establishment in 2002 of FEMIP within the framework of the EIB, but calls for further discussion between the EU Member States and their Euro-Mediterranean partners with the aim of developing this initiative into a genuine financial instrument for cooperation, responding to the new needs and challenges of both the public and private sector;
opozarja, da je razdelitev nalog med GD za zunanje odnose in urada EuropeAid funkcionalna v smislu, da je politična razsežnost programa ločena od funkcije za pripravo in nudenje strokovne pomoči ter da ostaja možnost za izboljšave v smislu uspešnosti in učinkovitosti;
Recalls that the task division between DG Relex and EuropeAid is functional in the sense that the political dimension of the programme is separate from the professional assistance formulation and delivery function and that there is, however, scope for improvement in terms of efficiency and effectiveness;
priznava, da je Komisija dosegla napredek pri zagotavljanju boljše prepoznavnosti zunanjega sodelovanja Skupnosti, in jo spodbuja k nadaljnjemu prizadevanju; kljub temu obžaluje, da javnost ni seznanjena s tesnim sodelovanjem EU v številnih projektih in programih; poziva Komisijo, da ustanovi svoja predstavništva v mednarodnih organizacijah in nevladnih organizacijah za:
Acknowledges the progress made by the Commission in ensuring a higher profile for Community external cooperation and urges it to continue the efforts currently being made; deplores, however, the fact that the public is not aware of the EU's close involvement in many projects and programmes; calls on the Commission to make representations to international organisations and NGOs with a view to:
zagotavljanje dobre javne prepoznavnosti prispevkov in sodelovanja EU,
ensuring public awareness of EU contributions and involvement,
zagotavljanje določb, ki omogočajo ustrezno izvajanje ukrepov vrednotenja, revizije in nadzora, tudi za projekte in programe, ki se izvajajo skupaj s temi mednarodnimi organizacijami ali nevladnimi organizacijami ali z njihovim posredovanjem;
laying down provisions enabling proper assessment, audit and control operations to be carried out also in connection with projects and programmes conducted jointly with or through international organisations or NGOs;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 1. junija 2006 o humanitarni krizi na palestinskih ozemljih in vlogi EU, v kateri je pozval Komisijo in Svet k razvoju začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma za preprečitev resnejše humanitarne krize na teh ozemljih; opominja, da je po priporočilih Evropskega sveta in Četverice iz junija 2006 pozdravil vzpostavitev začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma (TIM) za palestinske oblasti s strani EU in njegovo poznejšo obnovitev;
Recalls its resolution of 1 June 2006 on the humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian territories and the role of the EU in which it called on the Commission and the Council to develop a temporary international mechanism (TIM) in order to avoid a major humanitarian crisis in these territories; recalls having welcomed, following the recommendations of the European Council and the Quartet in June 2006, the setting-up by the EU of the TIM for the Palestinian Authority and its subsequent renewal;
ugotavlja, da je to začasno finančno sredstvo popolnoma pregledno in v partnerstvu s predsednikom palestinskih oblasti omogočilo, da se je omejilo najbolj nezaslišano človeško trpljenje, ki je posledica zamrznitve evropske in mednarodne finančne pomoči, dejstva, da je Izrael delno plačal palestinske davčne in carinske prihodke ter splošnega onemogočenega razvoja trajnostnega gospodarstva v sedanjem položaju zasedbe;
Notes that this financial stopgap measure made it possible, in a transparent manner and in partnership with the President of the Palestinian Authority, to limit the most egregious humanitarian suffering caused by the freezing of European and international financial aid, Israel's partial payment of Palestinian tax and customs revenues and the general impossibility of developing a viable economy in the current occupation situation;
čestita Komisiji za oblikovanje in izvajanje začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma v težkih razmerah ter meni, da so upravni stroški za začasni mednarodni mehanizem, ki za Okni II in III Vir: Sporočilo z dne 4. junija 2007 GD za pomoč in sodelovanje, enota za finance, pogodbe in revizijo za Evropo, Sredozemlje in Bližnji vzhod: TIM Okni II in III – pregled dodatkov in bančnih provizij.
Congratulates the Commission on the design and implementation of the TIM under difficult circumstances and considers the administrative cost of the TIM at the level of 5% for Windows II and III Source: Communication of 4 June 2007 from DG AidCo, Unit Finance, Contracts and Audit for Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East: TIM Windows II and III -– Summary of Allowances and Bank Fees.
dosegajo raven 5%, skromni, in ocenjuje, da je način neposrednega izplačevanja gospodinjstev prek poslovnih bank ustrezen; poleg tega poudarja, da v okviru Okna III mednarodno in lokalno delujoča banka (HSBC) zaračunava 8 EUR na prenos (3 % vseh namenjenih sredstev);
as modest, and the method of direct payment via commercial banks to the beneficiary households adequate; underlines moreover that under Window III the international and locally operating bank (HSBC) receives EUR 8 per transfer (3% of the total allocated amount);
poudarja, da plačila v okviru začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma niso bila namenjena ali izvedena preko predsedniškega urada Palestinske uprave ali ministrstva za finance, temveč so bili računi poravnani z neposrednimi plačili ali pa so bila posameznim upravičencem izplačana gotovinska plačila; ugotavlja, da sredstva niso zajemala varnostnega osebja ali podpore politikom;
Underlines that payments under the TIM did not go to, or through, the Office of the President of the Palestinian Authority or the Ministry of Finance, but that it provided for direct payment of invoices, or for cash payments to individual beneficiaries of allocations; notes that allocations did not cover security staff or support to politicians;
obžaluje, da finančna pomoč ni odtehtala tragičnih razmer v Palestini in da so se gospodarski, socialni in človeški pogoji tam v zadnjih mesecih poslabšali Poročilo delegacije Parlamenta za odnose s palestinskim Zakonodajnim svetom o misiji v vzhodni Jeruzalem, Ramalo in Gazo od 29. aprila do 3. maja 2007; Pregled javnih odhodkov Zahodnega brega in Gaze: "Od krize k večji fiskalni neodvisnosti" – dokument Svetovne banke, februar 2007.
Regrets however, that this financial assistance did not compensate for the tragic situation in Palestine and that conditions worsened in the past months in economic, social and human terms Report of the Parliament's delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council on its mission to East Jerusalem, Ramallah and Gaza on 29 April – 3 May 2007; West Bank and Gaza Public Expenditure Review: "From Crisis to Greater Fiscal Independence" – World Bank Document, February 2007.
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je mogoče z začasnim mednarodnim mehanizmom in brez sodelovanja vlade, ki jo vodi Hamas, več kot 140.000 gospodinjstvom z nizkimi prihodki, ki vključujejo več kot 800.000 oseb, neposredno zagotoviti skromna, vendar koristna sredstva v okviru Okna III, ter da je s podporo začasnega mednarodnega sporazuma nemoteni oskrbi osnovnih storitev v okviru Oken II mogoče preprečiti popolno odpoved delovanja bolnišnic in drugih osnovnih služb;
Welcomes the fact that through the TIM and without the involvement of the Hamas-led Government more than 140 000 low income households comprising more than 800 000 persons could be provided directly with modest but helpful allocations under Window III, and that the operation of hospitals and other basic services could be prevented from complete breakdown due to the TIM's support for the uninterrupted supply of essential services under Window II;
kljub temu obžaluje počasno izvajanje Okna I začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma, ki podpira zagotavljanje osnovnih zalog in kritje tekočih stroškov za bolnišnice s programom pomoči Svetovne banke za ukrepanje ob izrednih dogodkih (ESSP); ugotavlja, da je prva dostava zdravil v okviru ESSP potekala le 24. januarja 2007 za bolnišnice v Gazi; poziva Komisijo, da analizira razloge za te zamude in predlaga nadomestne možnosti za zagotovitev pravočasnega izvajanja ciljev Okna I začasnega mednarodnega mehanizma;
Regrets however the slow implementation of TIM Window I supporting the provision of essential supplies and running costs for hospitals through the World Bank's Emergency Services Support Programme (ESSP); notes that the first delivery of medicines under the ESSP took place only on 24 January 2007, to Gaza hospitals; invites the Commission to analyse the reasons for these delays and to suggest alternatives to ensure the timely implementation of the objectives of TIM Window I;
poudarja, da so mehanizmi kontrole in notranje revizije, ki jih palestinske oblasti vzpostavljajo od leta 2003, trdno jamstvo proti goljufijam in korupciji;
Stresses that the control mechanisms and internal audit put in place by the Palestinian Authority in 2003 constitute a solid guarantee against fraud and corruption;