natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da je zmanjšanje cene sladkorja, ki ga predlaga Komisija, večje kot bi bilo potrebno za prilagajanje pravilom STO; zato zahteva, da se to zmanjšanje omeji na nujno potrebno, da se v EU doseže in vzdržuje trajna, učinkovita in trdna proizvodnja sladkorja v skladu s pravili STO; meni, da mora biti zmanjšanje kvot podrejeno enakemu načelu in da skupni učinek zmanjšanja cen in kvot izpostavlja možnost za preživetje sektorja, tako v najbolj ranljivih kot tudi v najbolj konkurenčnih regijah;
Notes that the reduction in sugar prices proposed by the Commission goes beyond the requirements for compliance with the WTO rules; therefore calls for this reduction to be limited to what is strictly necessary to achieve and maintain a sustainable, efficient, robust sugar production in the EU, in compliance with the WTO rules; considers that the reduction in quotas must be governed by the same principle and that the cumulative effect of the reduction in prices and quotas calls into question the viability of the sector in both the most vulnerable and the most competitive regions;
zavrača predlog Komisije o povečanju kvot za izoglukozo, ker bi zaradi tega bilo potrebno nadalje zmanjšati kvote za sladkor;
Rejects the Commission's proposal to increase quotas for isoglucose, as this would make it necessary to further reduce the quotas for sugar;
obžaluje, da vprašanje lastništva kvot še ni pravno opredeljeno, in poziva Komisijo, naj določi, da so lastniki kvot posamezni pridelovalci sladkorne pese in sladkornega trsa;
Regrets that the question of quota ownership has not yet been legally determined and calls on the Commission to establish that the quotas are owned by the individual beet and cane growers;
ocenjuje, da sistem prenosa kvot, ki ga predlaga Komisija, ne ustreza ciljem na področju konkurence, zaposlovanja in solidarnosti Skupnosti; ga zavrača, ker ogroža najbolj ranljive, zlasti s prenosom zaposlitev in nesprejemljivo premestitvijo dejavnosti proizvodnje;
Considers that the quota transfer system proposed by the Commission fails to meet the objectives of competitiveness, employment and Community solidarity; rejects it on the grounds that it threatens those that are most vulnerable, in particular by causing a transfer of jobs and a relocation of productive activity which is unacceptable;
od Komisije zahteva, da razmisli o oblikovanju posebnega sklada, ki ga upravlja Evropska unija in ki bi omogočal tistim, ki to želijo, da zapustijo sistem pod razumnimi pogoji s prostovoljno prodajo kvot Evropski uniji po spodbudni ceni in s postopnim zmanjševanjem v omejenem obdobju, pri čemer bi te kvote bile takoj nato izbrisane; predlaga proračunsko nevtralno obliko financiranja v povezavi z akterji na tem področju in trgu;
Calls on the Commission to consider setting up a specific fund, managed by the European Union, to enable those wishing to leave the system to do so under reasonable conditions, through the voluntary sale of quotas to the European Union at an attractive price, degressive over time, for a limited period, immediately after which these quotas should be abolished; suggests a financing formula which is neutral in budgetary terms and involves stakeholders in the sector and also the market;
meni, da kvote predstavljajo ustrezno sredstvo za uravnotežen razvoj proizvodnje v Skupnosti in da jih je treba za ta namen tudi uporabljati; predlaga, da zakonodajni predlog vključuje pojem najnižje proizvodne kvote, ki se ohrani znotraj države članice;
Considers that quotas are an appropriate means of achieving a balanced development of production throughout the Community and that they should be used to that effect; suggests that the legislative proposal include the concept of a minimum production quota, to be maintained within a Member State;
poziva Komisijo, naj umakne predlog v zvezi s prenosom kvot med državami članicami;
Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal which allows the transfer of quotas between Member States;
poudarja, da so se nove članice pridružile Evropski uniji na temelju obveznosti, za spoštovanje katerih je bilo potrebno veliko truda; predlaga, da Komisija razmisli o možnosti, ki tem državam omogoča, da ne trpijo zaradi obsežnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje kvot; v tej zvezi opozarja na bistveno razliko v zvezi z načinom določitve kvote B za nove države članice; z zadovoljstvom sprejema predlog Komisije o dodelitvi nadomestila v celoti za proizvajalce sladkorne pese v novih državah članicah;
Points out that the new Member States joined the European Union on the basis of commitments that have demanded a significant effort to meet; suggests that the Commission should give thought to an arrangement whereby those States would not have to suffer excessive quota reduction measures; draws attention, in this context, to the substantial difference in the manner in which quota B is fixed for the new Member States; is delighted at the Commission's proposal to award full compensation to sugar beet growers in the new Member States;
poudarja, da mora biti reforma usklajena s pravili STO in zagotavljati ponovno ravnovesje trga Skupnosti na področju sladkorja ter vzdrževati proizvodnjo in varovanje življenjske ravni kmetov;
Notes that the reform should be consistent with WTO rules but should also ensure a balance on the Community sugar market, the continuation of production and the protection of farmers' living standards;
ocenjuje, da zmanjšanje ali ukinitev pomoči za izvoz ne sme voditi k varčevanju pri proračunskih sredstvih Skupnosti, temveč mora sektorju koristiti in omogočiti najboljše nadomestilo za izpad dohodka iz kmetijstva ali sprejetje drugih ukrepov za vzpostavitev ravnovesja na trgu;
Considers that the expected cuts in or abolition of export subsidies must not result in savings of Community budget resources but should be used for the benefit of the sector in order to enable farmers to be more adequately compensated for loss of income or other measures to be taken to achieve market equilibrium;
od Komisije zahteva, da upošteva rezultate v okviru STO pri pripravi zakonodajnega predloga; zato želi, da dokument predlaga rešitve v zvezi s prihodnostjo sladkorja C; na primer zahteva, da Komisija nujno ukrepa na področju razvoja alternativnih trgov za porabo sladkorja, da bi ponudila nove prodajne možnosti za proizvodnjo Skupnosti, ob upoštevanju možnosti, predstavljenih v zvezi z razvojem biogoriv; med drugim poziva Komisijo, da se usmeri h gospodarskim in ekološkim vidikom morebitne uporabe sladkorja kot biogoriva;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the outcome of the WTO panel in drafting its legislative proposal; in this context, hopes that the document will put forward solutions as regards the future of C sugar; for instance, calls on the Commission to take urgent steps to develop alternative outlets for the use of sugar so as to offer fresh marketing prospects for Community production, having regard, in particular, to the opportunities afforded by the development of biofuels; calls on the Commission to examine the possibilities of using sugar as biofuel, from an economic and environmental point of view;
zahteva, da je proizvodnja sladkorja kot živila in biogoriva predmet socialno-ekonomskih meril ter vsaj predpisov, ki določajo vzajemno spoštovanje kmetijskih in okoljskih potreb, pa tudi predmet povečanega števila kultur, ki zahtevajo kolobarjenje, kar kmetom omogoča izboljšavo zemlje in zagotavlja večfunkcionalnost kmetijstva z vidika proizvodnje sladkorja;
Calls for the application of social and environmental standards to the production of sugar both as food and fuel, including at least the environmental standards of cross-compliance and extended crop rotation as farmers' contribution to soil rehabilitation, thereby also promoting the multifunctional nature of agriculture in sugar production;
meni, da nadomestila za predviden izpad dohodka niso ustrezna; predlaga, da se v primeru omejenega znižanja cen, kot predlagano v odstavku 4, ohranja in dodeli proračun, ki ga predvideva Komisija, posebej lastnikom plantaž in gojiteljem pese, tako da prejmejo največje možno nadomestilo; poziva Komisijo, da pri izračunih nadomestil zaradi znižanja cen upošteva nižje cene v državah članicah, kjer se te cene uporabljajo;
Believes that the compensation for likely income losses is inadequate; proposes that in the event of a limited cut in prices, as suggested in paragraph 4, the budget originally proposed by the Commission should be maintained and allocated specifically to planters and beet growers so that they receive the fullest possible compensation; calls also on the Commission to ensure that, when compensation for price reductions is being calculated, the lower prices practised in the Member States which have applied them are taken into account;
upa, da bo del sklada, omenjenega v odstavku 8 (ali drug poseben sklad), bil namenjen za dohodke kmetovalcev kot nadomestilo za izgubo njihovih pravic dostave in v smislu preusmeritve njihove dejavnosti; hkrati zahteva sprejetje ukrepov socialne zaščite, ki bodo koristili delavcem, prizadetim zaradi zaprtja podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo s sladkorjem;
Hopes that some of the funds referred to in paragraph 8 (or some other specific fund) can be earmarked for farmers' incomes, as compensation for the loss of their delivery rights and with a view to helping them switch to other activities; also calls for social security measures for the workers affected by the closure of sugar farms;
pozdravlja obvezo Komisije v korist posebnega ravnanja pri najbolj oddaljenih regijah; kljub temu obžaluje ukinitev pomoči za prodajo; zahteva ponovno vzpostavitev tega mehanizma in povrnitev celotne odškodnine zaradi izpada dohodka, s čimer bi se v resnici upoštevale težave najbolj oddaljenih regij;
Endorses the Commission's commitment to special treatment for the outermost regions; nonetheless regrets the abolition of marketing aid; calls for the reinstatement of this mechanism and total compensation for income losses so as to take proper account of the disadvantages specific to the outermost regions;
upa, da bo Komisija z vso pozornostjo obravnavala položaj proizvodnje v manj razvitih regijah Evropske unije in prepoznala ukrepe, potrebne za izogibanje izginjanju proizvodnje pese in sladkorja v teh območjih v zvezi z reformo;
Hopes that the Commission will carefully assess the production situation in the disadvantaged areas of the EU and will identify the action which needs to be taken in order to prevent sugar-beet production from ceasing in such areas in the wake of the reform;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da podrobno spremljajo socialne posledice možnega zapiranja tovarn v zvezi s prihodnjo reformo ureditve na trgu sladkorja in da sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, če bodo socialni načrti nezadovoljivi;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor closely the social consequences of the possible closure of factories, due to the forthcoming reform of the sugar regime, and to take appropriate action if social plans are unsatisfactory;
Zunanji vidiki reforme
External aspects of the reform
opozarja, da ima zmožnost Unije, da nadzira ponudbo sladkorja na trgu, temeljno vlogo pri ravnovesju in delovanju skupne ureditve trga za sladkor;
Points out that the Union's ability to manage the supply of sugar on its market plays a key role in the balance and viability of the common organisation of the market in sugar;
poziva Komisijo, da zadosti zahtevam držav AKP in najmanj razvitih držav ter preuči možnosti ureditve pobude EBA na način, ki bi omogočal Evropski uniji ohraniti njeno sposobnost upravljanja ponudbe in se izogniti temu, da raven proizvodnje v Skupnosti ne bo postala obligatorna sprejemljivka prilagajanja v novi skupni ureditvi trga; predlaga, da ta oblika vzpostavi sredstva za količinski nadzor uvoznih kvot, ki so lahko redno ocenjene na podlagi resničnega vpliva pobude EBA za razvoj zadevnih držav, zlasti v zvezi z lokalno zaposlenostjo in proizvodnjo; predlaga, da so te kvote določene na ravni, ki omogoča nadaljnjo proizvodnjo živil, namenjenih za zagotavljanje oskrbe z živili za zadevno državo;
Urges the Commission to satisfy the requests of the ACP countries and the LDCs and explore the possibility of a regulatory arrangement for the EBA initiative which allows the European Union to retain its ability to manage supply and avoids making the level of Community production the obligatory adjustment variable of the new common organisation of the market; suggests that this formula should take the shape of instruments for the quantitative monitoring of import quotas which could be reviewed at regular intervals on the basis of the real impact of the EBA initiative on the development of the countries concerned, particularly in terms of local employment and production; proposes that the quotas be at a level which enables other foodstuffs to be produced to meet the country's own needs;
zahteva, da zakonodajni predlog Komisije onemogoči kakršen koli izvoz sladkorja iz tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo, ki bi bil izveden v okviru tristranske trgovine prek najmanj razvitih držav;
Calls for the Commission's legislative proposal to make it impossible to export any sugar from third countries to the European Union through triangular trade via the LDCs;
zahteva, da proizvodnja uvoženega sladkorja ustreza enakim socialno-ekonomskim merilom kot proizvodnja sladkorja v EU; v primeru, če države dobaviteljice ne spoštujejo teh meril, predlaga dajatev na uvožen sladkor, s katerim se bo polnil novi sklad EU, namenjen spodbujanju kmetijstva, prijaznega človeku in okolju, v državah v razvoju, ki dobavljajo sladkor;
Calls for the production of imported sugar to be subject to the same social and environmental standards as production of sugar in the EU; in the event that the supplier countries fail to comply with those standards, calls for the imposition of a levy on the imported sugar, which should be channelled into a new EU fund to promote humane and environment-friendly agriculture in the sugar-supplying developing countries;
poziva Komisijo, da takoj določi kvote za države Zahodnega Balkana, izračunane na podlagi potrjenih pridobljenih podatkov, in sicer tako, da te kvote ne rušijo ravnotežja domače proizvodnje in porabe in zato ne omogočajo ponovnega izvoza v EU;
Calls on the Commission to establish quotas for the West Balkan countries without delay, and based on duly confirmed historical data, in a way which ensures that these quotas will not overrun the net balance of domestic production and consumption, and, consequently, will not allow them to re-export sugar to the EU;
poziva Komisijo, da izboljša uveljavljen sistem nadzora za zagotavljanje spoštovanja pravil o poreklu, zlasti v zvezi z dejstvom, da razširjen dostop do evropskega trga v skladu z režimom EBA lahko povzroči cenovne razlike, ki bi lahko spodbudile goljufivo ravnanje;
Calls on the Commission to improve the control systems put in place to verify whether the rules of origin are respected, especially since increased access to the European market through the EBA scheme may create price differences which could incite fraudulent practices;
poziva Komisijo, da nujno predloži ustrezne spremljajoče ukrepe, namenjene pomoči državam AKP, ki so zelo odvisne od izvoza sladkorja v EU, za povečevanje njihove konkurenčnosti in zmogljivosti za raznolikost gospodarstva;
Calls on the Commission to urgently propose proper flanking measures to assist ACP countries depending heavily on sugar exports to the EU in increasing their competitiveness and enhancing their capacity to diversify their economic base;
zahteva zagotovilo Komisije, da stališče Evropske unije pri pogajanjih v okviru STO vključuje trenutno reformo, tako da prihodnje večstranske obveznosti ne bodo zahtevale nadaljnje reforme, ki bi povzročila, da bi proizvajalci plačevali dvakrat;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the current reform is built into the European Union's position in the WTO negotiations so that future multilateral commitments do not require further reform, which would result in producers having to pay twice;
prosi Komisijo, da še zlasti upošteva posledice reforme, zlasti v Braziliji, kjer sta proizvodnja in predelava sladkorja v rokah majhne skupine posameznikov in v škodo številnih delavcev na plantažah in v tovarnah; ocenjuje, da je EU moralno odgovorna za nadzor nad tem, da njene reforme ne podpirajo nevzdržnega latifundijskega načina proizvodnje sladkorja, ki se odvija v Braziliji;
Urges the Commission to take into consideration the impact of the reform in particular in Brazil, where sugar production and processing is controlled by a small number of individuals, to the detriment of the many who work in the sugar fields and factories; considers that the EU has a moral responsibility to ensure that its reforms do not facilitate the unsustainable latifundary method of sugar production as practised in Brazil;
poziva Komisijo, da se pogodi o povezovanju reforme o skupni evropski ureditvi trga za sladkor s podobnimi reformami ureditve trga sladkorja v drugih državah, zlasti v Združenih državah Amerike;
Calls on the Commission to negotiate coupling of the reform of the European common organisation of the market in sugar to similar reforms of the sugar market organisation in other countries, predominantly the United States of America;
poziva Komisijo, da naredi vse za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov v okviru STO za nadzor nad proizvodnjo in ceno sladkorja;
Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to reach international agreements within the WTO framework on the control of sugar production and sugar prices;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, parlamentom držav članic EU ter vladam in parlamentom držav AKP in najmanj razvitih držav.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Parliaments of the EU Member States and the Governments and Parliaments of the ACP and LDC countries.
B6-0193 , 0198 , 0206 , 0209 in 0212/2005
B6-0193 , 0198 , 0206 , 0209 and 0212/2005
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razmerah v Belorusiji, zlasti resolucij z dne 16. septembra 2004 Sprejeta besedila s tega dne, P6_TA(2004)0011.
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus, in particular that of 16 September 2004
ob upoštevanju mnenja št. 314/2004 o referendumu 17. oktobra 2004 v Belorusiji, ki je bilo sprejeto na 60. plenarnem zasedanju Beneške komisije Sveta Evrope 8. in 9. oktobra 2004,
having regard to Opinion No 314/2004 on the referendum of 17 October 2004 in Belarus, adopted by the Council of Europe's Venice Commission at its 60th Plenary Session on 8-9 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju končnih ugotovitev mednarodne misije Parlamentarne skupščine OVSE za opazovanje volitev z dne 9. decembra 2004,
having regard to the final conclusions of the International Election Observation Mission of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly of 9 December 2004,
ob upoštevanju resolucij Parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope o razmerah v Belorusiji, zlasti njene Resolucije 1372 (2004) z dne 28. aprila 2004 o preganjanju medijev v Republiki Belorusiji,
having regard to the resolutions by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the situation in Belarus and, in particular, to its Resolution 1372 (2004) of 28 April 2004 on the persecution of the press in the Republic of Belarus,
ob upoštevanju izjave vodje pisarne OVSE v Minsku septembra 2004 o zaporni kazni za dva člana beloruske opozicije, obtožena obrekovanja beloruskega predsednika,
having regard to the declaration of the Head of the OSCE Office in Minsk of September 2004 on the prison sentences passed on two members of the Belarus opposition accused of defaming the President of Belarus,
ob upoštevanju nagrade Saharov za svobodo misli, ki jo je decembra 2004 prejela Zveza novinarjev Belorusije,
having regard to its Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, which was awarded to the Belarusian Association of Journalists in December 2004,
ob upoštevanju resolucije o spoštovanju človekovih pravic v Belorusiji, ki jo je 15. aprila 2004 sprejela Komisija OZN za človekove pravice,
having regard to the resolution on the situation of human rights in Belarus adopted by the UN Commission on Human Rights on 15 April 2004,
ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter zlasti členov 19 in 21, ki zagotavljata pravico do svobode izražanja in mirnega zbiranja,
having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and in particular to Articles 19 and 21 which guarantee the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly,
ob upoštevanju sankcij EU, sprejetih 2. julija 2004 proti beloruskim uradnikom po izginotju treh beloruskih opozicijskih voditeljev in enega novinarja,
having regard to the EU sanctions adopted on 2 July 2004 against Belarusian officials following the disappearance of three Belarusian opposition leaders and one journalist,
ker se položaj v Belorusiji namesto izboljševanja stalno slabša, kar je pripeljalo do tega, da so človekove pravice in pravice manjšin brezobzirno kršene, da je spodnji dom brez svojih zakonodajnih pravic, gospodarsko življenje pa nadzira predsednik; ker te kršitve vključujejo zapor članov demokratične opozicije in druge oblike represije nad njimi, prekinitev registracije političnih strank pred volitvami, nadlegovanje in ustrahovanje opozicijskih kandidatov in prepoved navzočnosti predstavnikov opozicijskih strank na voliščih,
whereas, instead of improving, the situation in Belarus continues to deteriorate, which has led to a situation where human rights and the rights of minorities are blatantly violated, the Lower House is deprived of its legislative rights, and economic life is controlled by the President; whereas these violations include imprisonment of members of the democratic opposition and other forms of repression against them, the de-registration of political parties in the run-up to the elections, harassment and intimidation of opposition candidates and the banning of representatives of opposition parties at polling stations,
ker je bil Mihail Marinič, bivši minister za zunanje ekonomske odnose, nekdanji veleposlanik in predsedniški kandidat na volitvah sredi leta 2001, obsojen na pet let zapora, kazen pa je bila 18. februarja 2005 znižana na tri leta in šest mesecev,
whereas Mikhail Marynich, ex-Minister for Foreign Economic Relations, former Ambassador and presidential candidate in the mid-2001 elections, was sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment, which, on 18 February 2005, was reduced to 3 years and 6 months,
ker je bilo v zadnjih nekaj letih več političnih strank in več kot 50 demokratičnih NVO z različnih področij in različnih političnih prepričanj, 25 neodvisnih množičnih medijev in več izobraževalnih ustanov zaprtih zaradi "tehničnih" razlogov, vendar je bilo pri vseh primerih jasno, da so bile te organizacije kaznovane zaradi kritiziranja predsednika in njegove politike,
whereas over the past few years several political parties and more than 50 pro-democracy NGOs of different levels and different political persuasions, 25 independent mass media entities and several educational establishments have been closed down for "technical" reasons, but whereas it was clear that in every case these organisations were being punished for criticising the President and his policy,
ker so politične aretacije in sodni procesi aktivistov demokratičnega gibanja in neodvisnih novinarjev ter izgon tujih državljanov v Belorusiji redna praksa; ker sta bila septembra 2004 dva člana beloruske opozicije, Valerij Levonevski in Aleksander Vasiljev, obsojena na dve leti zapora zaradi obrekovanja beloruskega predsednika,
whereas politically motivated arrests and trials of activists belonging to the democratic movement and independent journalists and deportations of foreign citizens are continually taking place in Belarus; whereas in September 2004 two members of the Belarus opposition, Valery Levonevsky and Alexander Vasilyev, were sentenced to two years in prison on a charge of defaming the President of Belarus,