natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje, da države članice glede lastnih sredstev Unije niso izkoristile priložnosti, da bi vzpostavile sistem pravih lastnih sredstev Unije, kar bi bilo pravičnejše, preglednejše, državljanom razumljivejše in bi zanje veljal bolj demokratičen postopek odločanja;
Regrets that, as regards the Union's own resources, the Member States have failed to take the opportunity to establish a system of genuine own resources that is fairer, more transparent, more readily understandable to the public and subject to a more democratic decision-making procedure;
obžaluje zlasti, da ni bil dosežen napredek pri vključevanju Parlamenta v določanje omejitev in vrste lastnih sredstev, ki jih ima Unija na voljo; opozarja, da se ohranja ločevanje med odločanjem o prihodkih in odločanjem o odhodkih;
Regrets, in particular, that no progress has been made in involving Parliament in the process of determining the limits to and the nature of the own resources available to the Union; points out that decision making on revenue and decision making on expenditure remain separate;
pozdravlja pa prizadevanja glede možnosti za sprejetje ukrepov za izvajanje sklepa o lastnih sredstvih s posebnim zakonodajnim postopkom, v katerem Svet odloča s kvalificirano večino le po pridobitvi odobritve Parlamenta;
Welcomes, however, the efforts made to ensure that measures implementing the decision on own resources can be adopted by means of a special legislative procedure under which the Council acts by a qualified majority only after securing Parliament's consent;
poziva Svet, naj to ureditev uporablja, kadar je mogoče, da bi bil postopek odločanja prožnejši;
Calls on the Council to employ that arrangement wherever possible in order to make the decision-making procedure more flexible;
pozdravlja formalizacijo VFO v Lizbonski pogodbi, ki je postal pravno zavezujoči akt; opozarja, da VFO uvaja načrtovanje odhodkov Unije ter določa njihove zgornje meje za določeno obdobje ter prispeva h krepitvi proračunske discipline;
Welcomes the formal status granted in the Lisbon Treaty to the MFF, which becomes a legally binding act; points out that the MFF programmes EU expenditure and places a ceiling on Union spending over a given period, thereby helping to strengthen budgetary discipline;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da morata uredbo, ki določa VFO, v posebnem postopku skupaj odobriti Parlament in Svet;
Welcomes the fact that the regulation laying down the MFF will have to be jointly approved by Parliament and the Council, under a special procedure;
vendar obžaluje, da je Lizbonska pogodba ohranila zahtevo po soglasni odločitvi Sveta za sprejetje VFO, kar otežuje postopek odločanja ter spodbuja pogajanja na osnovi "najmanjšega skupnega imenovalca"; zato spodbuja Evropski svet, naj, takoj ko je mogoče, uporabi določbo, ki mu s soglasno sprejetim sklepom omogoča, da preide na odločanje s kvalificirano večino za sprejetje VFO;
Regrets, however, that the Lisbon Treaty has retained the requirement that the Council should act unanimously when adopting the MFF, rendering the decision-making procedure very difficult and encouraging negotiations on the basis of the "lowest common denominator"; urges the European Council, therefore, to make use as soon as possible of the provision which enables it, by means of a unanimous decision, to impose a switch to qualified-majority voting for the adoption of the MFF;
prav tako obžaluje, da ima Parlament v novem postopku samo pravico, da daje odobritev in ne prave pravice soodločanja; poudarja pa dejstvo, da Lizbonska pogodba določa, da morajo institucije sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za začetek postopka, da zagotovijo njegov končni uspeh; zato poziva Svet, naj pokaže pripravljenost že na začetku postopka za oblikovanje strukturiranega političnega dialoga s Parlamentom, da bi se v celoti upoštevale te prednostne naloge;
Regrets, further, that under the new procedure Parliament has only a right of approval and no genuine power of codecision; however, emphasises the fact that the Lisbon Treaty stipulates that the institutions must take any measure necessary, throughout the procedure, to ensure that is ultimately successful; calls on the Council, therefore, to demonstrate its willingness, from the start of the procedure, to develop a structured political dialogue with Parliament in order to take full account of the latter's priorities;
ugotavlja, da Lizbonska pogodba navaja, da VFO poleg "letnih zgornjih meja glede odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za prevzem obveznosti po vrstah odhodkov in letnih zgornjih meja odobrenih proračunskih sredstev za plačila" vsebuje tudi "vse druge potrebne določbe za nemoten potek letnega proračunskega postopka" Člen 312(3) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (konsolidirana različica) (UL C 115, 9.5.2008, str.
Notes that the Lisbon Treaty stipulates that the MFF will determine not only the "amounts" of the "annual ceilings on commitment appropriations by category of expenditure and of the annual ceiling on payment appropriations", but will also lay down "any other provisions required for the annual budgetary procedure to run smoothly' Article 312(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version) (OJ C 115, 9.5.2008, p.
pozdravlja dejstvo, da Lizbonska pogodba omogoča petletno finančno načrtovanje, tako da (če je treba vpeljati potrebne spremembe) večletni finančni okvir sovpada, kolikor je le mogoče, z mandatom Parlamenta in Komisije, kot zahteva demokratična logika; poudarja, da utegnejo biti potrebne posebne rešitve, da bi lahko zadovoljili potrebe posameznih politik po dolgoročnejših finančnih obdobjih;
Welcomes the fact that the Lisbon Treaty provides for the possibility of financial programming over five years, so that, if the necessary changes are introduced, the MFF can be made to match, as far as possible, Parliament's parliamentary term and the Commission's term of office, as democratic logic requires; emphasises that particular arrangements to cope with the needs of specific policies for longer-term financial periods could be required;
zato podpira prehod na petletni večletni finančni okvir, vendar se zaveda, da je popolno sovpadanje med večletnim finančnim okvirom in mandatom Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije težavno, saj meni, da potrebujemo obdobje pogajanj, ki traja vsaj eno leto, da se vsakemu novemu Parlamentu in vsaki novi Komisiji omogoči sprejemanje temeljnih odločitev glede finančne politike med svojim mandatom;
Supports, therefore, the switch to a five-year MFF, but is aware that a full coincidence between the MFF and the term of the European Parliament and the term of Office of the Commission might be difficult, as it considers that a negotiating period of at least one year may be necessary to allow each new Parliament and each new Commission to take fundamental financial policy decisions during their terms of office;
meni, da je vključitev VFO v celostni pristop medinstitucionalnega strateškega načrtovanja - ki ga med drugim poudarja Lizbonska pogodba -, kot ga predlaga poročilo Odbora za ustavne zadeve o institucionalnem ravnotežju Poročilo z dne 18. marca 2009 o vplivu Lizbonske pogodbe na razvoj institucionalnega ravnotežja v Evropski uniji ( A6-0142/2009 ).
Takes a very favourable view of the incorporation of the MFF into a comprehensive approach to interinstitutional strategic programming - one which, moreover, is consolidated in the Lisbon Treaty - as suggested in the report by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs on the institutional balance Dehaene report of 18 March 2009 on the impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the development of the institutional balance of the European Union ( A6-0142/2009 ).
podpira predlog, ki je oblikovan v tem poročilu, po katerem mora novi kolegij komisarjev ob predstavitvi svojega "programa zakonodajnega obdobja" predložiti predloge smernic finančnega okvira, za katere misli, da so potrebne za izpolnjevanje političnih prednostnih nalog za zadevni mandat, prednostne naloge, ki se bodo potem, ko bo med institucijami dogovorjen program zakonodajnega obdobja, razvijale po predlogih v VFO;
Endorses the proposal made in that report that the new College of Commissioners, when presenting its "programme for its term of office", should submit proposals concerning the guidelines for the financial framework which it regards as necessary to achieve political priorities for its term of office - priorities which, once the programme for the parliamentary term has been agreed between the institutions, would be developed through its proposals in the MFF;
poleg tega meni, da mora med razpravami na plenarnem zasedanju in predstavitvami pred parlamentarnimi odbori imenovani kandidat za predsednika Komisije že biti sposoben podati informacije o predvidljivih finančnih posledic političnih ciljev, ki jim namerava slediti nova Komisija;
Takes the view, moreover, that at debates in plenary and hearings before the parliamentary committees the nominee for the post of President of the Commission should already be in a position to provide an outline of the likely financial implications of the political objectives the new Commission intends to pursue;
poudarja, da prehod na zgoraj omenjeno petletno finančno načrtovanje zahteva podaljšanje in prilagoditev obstoječega večletnega finančnega okvira do vključno leta 2016, da bo začel naslednji petletni finančni okvir veljati najkasneje v začetku leta 2017 V skladu z modelom, ki ga opisuje tabela poročila Odbora za proračun z dne 26. februarja 2009 o vmesnem pregledu finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007-2013 ( A6-0110/2009 ): Leto 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Predlog proračuna 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Zakonodajno obdobje 2004 / 2009 2009 / 2014 2014 / 2019 VFO Pregled za obdobje 2007 / 2013 2013 / 2016 2017 / 202
Emphasises that the switch to five-year financial programming, as referred to above, could necessitate the prolongation and adjustment of the current MFF to 2016 inclusive, so that the next five-year MFF can enter into force, at the latest, in early 2017 In keeping with the model described in the following table taken from the Committee on Budgets" report of 26 February 2009 on the mid-term review of the financial framework 2007-2013 ( A6-0110/2009 ): Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 budget prep 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Parliamentary term 2004 / 2009 2009 / 2014 2014 / 2019 MFF Review 2007 / 2013 2013 / 2016 2017 / 202
; priporoča, da se v vsakem primeru pogajanja za prihodnji večletni finančni okvir zaključijo do konca prvega trimesečja leta 2016, da se tako omogoči, da proračunski postopek za leto 2017 poteka že znotraj parametrov okvira, ki bo veljaven leta 2017;
; recommends that the negotiations for the next MFF be in any case concluded by the end of the first trimester of 2016, in order to allow for the budgetary procedure for 2017 to run already within the parameters of the framework that will be in force in 2017;
poudarja, da morajo biti pogajanja končana na takšen način, da se institucijam omogoči načrtovanje začetka veljavnosti novega večletnega finančnega okvira že leta 2016;
Stresses that the negotiations should be conducted in such a way as to allow the institutions to envisage the entry into force of a new MFF already in 2016;
meni, da se o podaljšanju in prilagoditvi trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira lahko razmisli pri opravljanju vmesnega pregleda leta 2010;
Considers that the prolongation and adjustment of the current MFF should be considered when the next mid-term review is carried out in 2010;
poudarja, da je zaradi pravno zavezujoče narave VFO potrebno bolj kot kdajkoli uvesti večjo prilagodljivost, da bi Uniji omogočili dovolj prožno in učinkovito odzivanje na nepredvidene izzive tako v Uniji kot zunaj nje;
Emphasises that the legally binding nature of the MFF necessitates, even more than before, the introduction of more flexible implementing arrangements so that the Union can respond sufficiently flexibly and effectively to unforeseen challenges, both within and outside the Union;
opozarja na dejstvo, da Lizbonska pogodba predvideva razširitev zgornjih meja in drugih določb VFO, ki ustrezajo preteklemu letu, če novi VFO ne bo sprejet pred potekom prejšnjega; meni, da to predstavlja dodatno utemeljitev za večjo prilagodljivost;
Draws attention to the fact that the Lisbon Treaty stipulates that the ceilings corresponding to the last year of the existing MFF and other provisions will be extended if the new MFF has not been adopted before the preceding MFF expires; regards this as a further argument in favour of increased flexibility;
s tem v zvezi poudarja pomen okrepitve mehanizmov prilagodljivosti v okviru in med posameznimi postavkami na eni strani, ter prek posebnih instrumentov prilagodljivosti, ki se lahko uporabijo zunaj zgornjih meja na drugi strani;
Emphasises, in that connection, the importance of strengthening flexibility mechanisms operating within and between each heading and through specific flexibility instruments which can be mobilised outside the margins;
opozarja, da bo Odbor za proračun podal mnenje o teh vprašanjih pri sprejetju svojega poročila o vmesnem pregledu večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 2007–2013;
Points out that the Committee on Budgets will give its views on these matters when adopting its report on the mid-term review of the 2007-2013 MFF;
opozarja, da je treba pravočasno pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe doseči soglasje med institucijami o načinu prehoda iz sedanjega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma v VFO, ki je vsebovan v zakonodajnem aktu, kot določa Lizbonska pogodba; ponovno opozarja, da je za pregled osnutkov zakonodajnih aktov v nacionalnih parlamentih potrebno obdobje osmih tednov;
Draws attention to the need, in good time prior to the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, for the institutions to reach agreement on the arrangements for making the transition from the current interinstitutional agreement to an MFF contained in a legislative act, as provided for by the Lisbon Treaty; recalls that a period of eight weeks is required for scrutiny by national parliaments of draft legislative acts;
s tem v zvezi meni, da bo treba doseči soglasje glede porazdelitve določb, ki jih sedaj vsebuje medinstitucionalni sporazum, in ki morajo preiti v VFO in bodo vključene v prihodnjo finančno uredbo oziroma bodo, po potrebi, upravičile ohranitev medinstitucionalnega sporazuma - ki bi bil po možnosti obogaten z novimi določbami - o proračunskem sodelovanju; opozarja, da mora delitev določb iz sedanjega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma upoštevati merila, ki jih določa sama Lizbonska pogodba;
Takes the view, in that connection, that agreement will have to be reached as to which of the provisions that currently form part of the interinstitutional agreement should be switched to the MFF, which should be incorporated into the future Financial Regulation and which might justify the retention of an interinstitutional agreement - possibly incorporating new provisions - on budgetary cooperation; points out that this process of dividing up the provisions of the current interinstitutional agreement will have to take account of the criteria laid down in the Lisbon Treaty itself;
pozdravlja odpravo ločevanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, zaradi česar ima sedaj Parlament pravico odločanja o vseh izdatkih Unije pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet;
Warmly welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory expenditure (CE) and non-compulsory expenditure (NCE), as a result of which Parliament now has the right to take decisions concerning all Union expenditure on an equal footing with the Council;
poudarja, da odprava ločevanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki ni v nasprotju z obveznostmi Unije, da spoštuje finančne obveznosti, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da Lizbonska pogodba priznava, da Parlament, Svet in Komisija zagotovijo, da so Uniji "na voljo finančna sredstva, ki ji omogočajo izpolnjevanje njenih pravnih obveznosti do tretjih strani" Člen 323 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (konsolidirana različica).
Emphasises that the abolition of the distinction between CE and NCE is not at odds with the Union's obligation to honour its financial commitments, and welcomes the fact that the Lisbon Treaty acknowledges that it is for Parliament, the Council and the Commission to ensure "that the financial means are made available to allow the Union to fulfil its legal obligations in respect of third parties" Article 323 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version).
ugotavlja, da morajo spremembe letnega proračunskega postopka služiti njegovi poenostavitvi z določitvijo ene obravnave za vsako institucijo ter z uvedbo številnih določb, ki bodo namenjene omogočanju doseganja soglasja med obema vejama proračunskega organa; poudarja, da morajo te spremembe privesti do zmanjšanja birokracije;
Notes that the changes to the annual budgetary procedure should serve to make it more simple by laying down the principle of a single reading for each institution and by introducing a number of mechanisms designed to help the two arms of the budgetary authority reach agreement; emphasises that these changes should lead to less bureaucracy;
poudarja okrepitev vloge, dodeljene Komisiji, ki pridobi pravico do pobude na proračunskem področju in lahko spremeni svoj predlog proračuna vse do trenutka, ko se ne skliče Spravni odbor;
Emphasises the strengthening of the role conferred on the Commission, which acquires a right of initiative in the budgetary sphere and may amend its draft budget until such time as the Conciliation Committee is convened;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da pogodba prav tako priznava, da Komisija med delom Spravnega odbora prevzame vse potrebne pobude za uskladitev stališč Parlamenta in Sveta, in jo poziva, naj v celoti prevzame svojo vlogo posrednice med Parlamentom in Svetom, da se doseže soglasje;
Welcomes the fact that the Treaty also acknowledges that it is for the Commission to take all the necessary initiatives with a view to reconciling the positions of Parliament and the Council during the proceedings of the Conciliation Committee, thus inviting it to play to the full its role of mediator between Parliament and the Council with a view to securing an agreement;
opozarja, da novi postopek vsebuje le eno obravnavo predloga proračuna v vsaki instituciji; poudarja, da novi postopek z eno obravnavo institucijam dejansko več ne omogoča prilagoditve njihovega stališča v drugi obravnavi, kot je bilo to mogoče prej; je torej prepričan, da bo postopek zahteval, da Parlament v zgodnji fazi natančno opredeli svoje politične prednostne naloge in v skladu s tem spremeni svoj operativni pristop in organizacijo, ki omogočata doseganje vseh zastavljenih ciljev;
Draws attention to the fact that the new procedure provides for only a single reading of the draft budget by each institution; emphasises that the new procedure and the single reading will no longer make it possible in de facto terms for the institutions to adjust their standpoints at second reading, as they were able to hitherto; is convinced, therefore, that this procedure will require Parliament to fine-tune its political priorities at an earlier stage and adapt accordingly its operational approach and organisational arrangements so as to enable it to achieve all the objectives set;
opozarja, da mora ta obravnava potrditi politične prednostne naloge Parlamenta in mu tudi omogočati doseganje soglasja s Svetom, ko Spravni odbor zaključi delo (ali, da ponovno glasuje o svojih predlogih sprememb z veliko večino, če z besedilom, ki ga pripravi Spravni odbor, Parlament soglaša, Svet pa ga zavrne);
Points out that this single reading must be used to assert Parliament's political priorities, but must also enable it to reach agreement with the Council by the time the Conciliation Committee has completed its work (or enable it to adopt its amendments again by a large majority, in the event of approval by Parliament and rejection by the Council of the text drawn up by the Conciliation Committee);
s tem v zvezi poudarja, da je treba ohraniti pragmatičen časovni razpored, ki je podoben sedanjemu, ter zahteva pravočasno uporabo usklajevalnih mehanizmov; opozarja, da je uvedba neformalnih mehanizmov dialoga med institucijami bistvenega pomena za lažje doseganje soglasja pred začetkom postopka koz tudi med njim;
Emphasises, in that connection, the importance of retaining a pragmatic timetable similar to the current one, whilst calling for conciliation to be initiated in good time; points out, moreover, that the introduction of informal arrangements for dialogue between the institutions is crucial to facilitating agreement before the procedure starts and then throughout its duration;
prepričan je, da bo Lizbonska pogodba okrepila pristojnosti Parlamenta, če bo ta lahko učinkovito obvladoval tesen časovni razpored in povečano potrebo po načrtovanju vnaprej, ki sledi z novim postopkom;
Is convinced that the Lisbon Treaty will strengthen Parliament's powers, provided that it equips itself with the means to manage effectively both the tighter timetable and the greater need to plan ahead thoroughly which will result from the introduction of the new procedure;
meni, da bo v prihodnje resolucija Parlamenta pred prvim spravnim sestankom imela večji pomen, saj bo Parlamentu omogočala, da bo formalno izrazil proračunske prednostne naloge za prihodnje proračunsko leto, brez pogojenosti s taktičnimi premisleki, ki izhajajo iz stališča Sveta o predlogu proračuna; meni, da bo omenjena resolucija tako omogočila drugim institucijam, da jasno vidijo prednostne naloge Parlamenta pred medinstitucionalnimi pogajanji; dodaja, da bo to Parlamentu zagotovilo tudi priložnost za predstavitev izhodiščnih smernic o pilotnih projektih in pripravljalnih ukrepih;
Takes the view that in future its resolution before the first conciliation meeting will take on increased importance, since it will enable Parliament formally to set out its budgetary priorities for the coming financial year, unencumbered by tactical considerations linked to the Council's position on the draft budget; takes the view that that resolution will thus give the other institutions a clear picture of Parliament's priorities before the interinstitutional negotiations start; adds that this will also provide Parliament with an opportunity to set out some initial guidelines concerning pilot projects and preparatory actions;
opozarja, da bodo te prednostne naloge tudi zelo koristne za Parlament kot smernice za obravnavo predloga proračuna in za mandat njegove delegacije pri pogajanjih v Spravnem odboru;
Points out that these priorities will also be of great value to Parliament both as guidelines for its reading of the draft budget and as a negotiating mandate for its delegation to the Conciliation Committee;
poudarja pomen priprave tristranskega pogovora v juliju, da bi vsaki instituciji omogočili jasen vpogled v prednostne naloge drugih strani, in Parlamentu, da bo druge institucije seznanil z vsebino julijske resolucije o predlogu proračuna;
Stresses the importance of organising a trialogue in July of each year in order to enable each institution to gain a clear insight into the priorities of the other parties and to enable Parliament to apprise the other institutions of the substance of the resolution on the draft budget to be adopted in July;
poudarja politično vrednost vzpostavitve (ob spoštovanju pristojnosti vsake strani) poglobljenega dialoga sodelujočih odborov nacionalnih parlamentov o predlogu proračuna in prednostnih nalogah Parlamenta za letni proračunski postopek;
Highlights the political value of the establishment – in keeping with each body's respective powers – of in-depth dialogue with the counterpart committees from the national parliaments on the draft budget and Parliament's priorities for the annual budgetary procedure;