natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ki ga predlagata Giles Chichester in Urszula Gacek
by Giles Chichester and Urszula Gacek
o obvladovanju cen energije
on getting a grip on energy prices
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o obvladovanju cen energije
European Parliament resolution on getting a grip on energy prices
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o odvisnosti od nafte z dne 29. septembra 2005 (P6‑TA (2005)361) in o krizi v ribiškem sektorju zaradi naraščanja cen goriva z dne 19. junija 2008 (P6–TA (2008)308),
having regard to its having regard to its resolutions on oil dependency of 29 September 2005 (P6-TA (2005)361) and on the crisis in the fisheries sector caused by rising fuel prices of 19 June 2008 (P6-TA (2008)308),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o soočanju z izzivom višjih cen nafte (KOM(2008) 384 končno),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission on ‘Facing the challenge of higher oil prices’ (COM(2008) 384 final),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 19. in 20. junija 2008,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the European Council of 19-20 June 2008,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma z neuradnega zasedanja sveta ECOFIN 12. in 13. septembra 2008,
having regard to the agreement at the informal ECOFIN Council of 12-13 September 2008,
ker so poleti leta 2008 cene nafte realno dosegle najvišjo raven doslej, zvišale so se tudi cene drugih energetskih proizvodov, cene goriva za potrošnike pa so sledile trendu, ki so ga začele cene surove nafte, ker se je pritisk na cene nafte zaradi šibkega dolarja še povečal,
whereas in the summer oil prices reached their all-time highest level in real terms, prices of other energy products have also risen and consumer fuel prices have been following the trend of the crude oil price; whereas the weak dollar has contributed to pressure on oil prices,
ker bodo po ocenah cene nafte srednjeročno in dolgoročno ostale visoke, to pa bo negativno vplivalo na inflacijo in rast gospodarstva v EU,
whereas estimates indicate that oil prices will stay high in the medium‑ to long‑term and this will have a negative impact on inflation and the growth of the EU economy,
ker višje ravni cen ogrožajo kupno moč državljanov EU, pri čemer najhujše posledice doletijo gospodinjstva z najnižjimi dohodki in energetsko intenzivne industrijske sektorje,
whereas the higher price levels are undermining the purchasing power of EU citizens, with the most negative impact being on the lowest income households and energy‑intensive industry sectors,
ker na porast cen energije vpliva več zapletenih nizov dejavnikov: strukturni premik pri ponudbi nafte in povpraševanju po njej, vse manjše število in obseg novih naftnih polj, omejena širitev proizvodnje nafte, geopolitični dejavniki, manj naložb v tehnološki napredek, višji stroški naložb in pomanjkanje kvalificirane delovne sile v glavnih državah proizvajalkah,
whereas the hike in energy prices is influenced by a combination of complex sets of factors: structural shift of oil supply and demand; shrinking number and size of new oilfields; limited oil production expansion; geopolitical factors; less investment in technology advances; higher investment costs; lack of qualified workforce in the main producing countries,
ker so boljša preglednost in zanesljivost ter pogostejše objavljanje podatkov o komercialnih zalogah nafte pomembni za učinkovito delovanje naftnih trgov,
whereas the increased transparency, reliability and more frequent publication of data on commercial oil stocks are important for the efficient functioning of oil markets,
ker so sedanji finančni pretresi prisilili vlagatelje v iskanje alternativnih naložb in so prispevali k večji kratkoročni cenovni nestanovitnosti,
whereas the current financial turmoil has pushed investors to seek alternative investments and has contributed to increased short‑term price volatility;
ker je gospodarstvo EU še vedno močno odvisno od uvoza nafte in so morebitna nova polja večinoma na „nekonvencionalnih nahajališčih“, zaradi česar se povišajo stroški naložb za njihov razvoj,
whereas the EU economy is still highly dependent on imported oil, and potential new fields are mostly in ‘unconventional deposits’, making investment costs higher for their development,
izraža zaskrbljenost nad zvišanjem cen energije, zlasti zaradi negativnih posledic na evropsko gospodarstvo in konkurenčnost, kar ovira uresničitev ciljev lizbonske strategije;
Expresses it concern at the increase in energy prices, notably because of its negative effect on the European economy and competitiveness, which is hampering attainment of the Lisbon Strategy objectives;
poudarja, da je treba sprejeti ukrepe, ki bodo gospodarstvu EU omogočili, da ostane konkurenčno in se prilagodi okolju z novimi cenami nafte;
Underlines the necessity to take measures that will enable the EU economy to maintain its competitiveness and to adapt to the new oil price environment;
poziva k močni politični zavezanosti prehodu na evropsko gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika, spodbujanju obnovljivih virov energije, energetski učinkovitosti in drugim virom energije z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika ter k prizadevanju za raznolikost oskrbe z energijo in zmanjšanju odvisnosti od uvoženih fosilnih goriv, saj je ta premik najbolj logičen odziv na višje cene nafte; se strinja, da morajo tem strateškim ukrepom nujno slediti večje finančne obveznosti na področju raziskav in razvoja;
Calls for strong political commitment to move to a low-carbon EU economy, to promote renewables, energy efficiency and other low‑carbon energy sources, and to pursue diversification of energy supply and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuels, as this shift is the most logical response to higher oil prices; endorses the need for those strategic measures necessarily to be followed up by strong financial commitments in R&D;
podpira sklep Evropskega sveta, da je treba sprejeti kratkoročne in ciljno usmerjene ukrepe, da se ublaži negativni učinek na najrevnejša gospodinjstva; vendar meni, da se je treba izogibati ukrepom, ki bi povzročili višjo inflacijo in zmanjšali število pobud za varčevanje z energijo, saj lahko poslabšajo vzdržnost javnih financ in jih višje cene nafte lahko izničijo;
Supports the European Council’s decision that short-term and targeted measures should be taken in order to alleviate the negative impact on the poorest households; however, considers that measures inducing more inflation and less energy‑saving incentives should be avoided as they can be a detriment to public finance sustainability and invalidated by higher prices of oil;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da potrošniki še vedno plačujejo višje cene, pri čemer se znižanja cen ne odražajo vedno v celoti;
Notes with concern that consumers continue to pay higher prices not always fully reflecting downwards fluctuations in prices;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja za izboljšanje stanja konkurence v naftnem sektorju in zagotovi skladnost z obstoječimi pravili o konkurenci; meni, da se je treba osredotočiti zlasti na preiskovanje oligopolov in kartelov pri rafiniranju in distribuciji do točk potrošnje ter boj proti njim;
Calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to improve the terms of competition in the oil sector and to ensure compliance with existing competition rules; considers that a particular focus should be placed on investigating and combating oligopolies and cartels in refining and distribution to points of consumption;
meni, da bi morala imeti Evropska investicijska banka pomembnejšo vlogo pri zagotavljanju sredstev za energetsko učinkovitost, obnovljive vire energije ter projekte raziskav in razvoja, s posebnim poudarkom na malih in srednjih podjetjih;
Considers that the EIB should have a more prominent role in providing funding for energy efficiency, renewables and R&D projects, especially with a focus on SMEs;
poziva Komisijo, naj svoj predlog o pregledu direktive o obdavčitvi energije predstavi po natančni preučitvi učinkov, ki bi jih davčni ukrepi lahko imeli na inflacijo, nove naložbe v proizvodnjo in iskanje nafte ter na prehod na evropsko gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika;
Invites the Commission to present its proposal on the Energy Tax Directive review, after carefully examining the effects that taxation measures could have on inflation, on new investments in oil production and exploration, and on the transition to the EU low‑carbon economy;
poudarja pomen boljše preglednosti in zanesljivosti podatkov o naftnih trgih in zalogah nafte; meni, da je treba izboljšati razumevanje razvoja cen naftnih proizvodov; poziva k pravočasni reviziji zakonodaje Skupnosti o varnostnih zalogah nafte;
Stresses the importance of the increased transparency and reliability of data on oil markets and oil stocks; considers is important to improve the understanding of oil product price development; calls for a timely revision of the Community legislation on emergency oil stocks;
poziva EU, naj okrepi učinkovit dialog z državami članicami organizacije OPEC in državami, ki niso članice te organizacije, katerega cilj naj bo večja stabilnost cen nafte in predvidljivost pri oskrbi s končnimi naftnimi proizvodi ter plačevanje nafte v evrih namesto v ameriških dolarjih;
Calls on the EU to improve an effective dialogue with OPEC and non-OPEC countries, aimed at greater stability of oil prices, more predictability in supplies of finished oil products and payment for oil sales in euros instead of US dollars;
ponovno poudarja pomen skupne energetske politike EU in zanesljivosti oskrbe ter evropske sosedske politike; meni, da bi morala EU v zvezi s tem prevzeti vodilno vlogo pri energetskem dialogu s ključnimi dobavitelji nafte; pozdravlja zamisel o srečanju na visoki ravni med državami porabnicami in državami proizvajalkami nafte;
Reiterates the importance of an EU common energy policy and security of supply, and of the European Neighbourhood Policy; believes in this respect that the EU should take the lead in the energy dialogue with key oil suppliers; welcomes the idea of a high‑level summit between oil consuming and producing countries;
spodbuja podjetja iz EU, naj bodo bolj proaktivna, in sicer z dodatnimi naložbami, ter naj pri novih tehnologijah prevzamejo vodilno vlogo na področju strokovnega in inženirskega znanja, da bi za glavne države proizvajalke ostala ključni partner;
Encourages EU companies to be more proactive, namely by making further investments, and take the lead in new technology know-how and engineering skills, in order to remain key partners with the main oil producing countries;
ugotavlja, da je treba izboljšati družbeno odgovornost podjetij v glavnih naftnih družbah, da bi se več zasebnih naložb, financiranih s trenutnimi nepričakovanimi dobički v naftni industriji, preusmerilo v programe varčevanja z energijo in alternativne energetske tehnologije ter raziskave in razvoj;
Notes that Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) should be improved within the major oil companies in order to channel more private investment, financed by any current windfall profits in the oil industry, into energy‑saving programmes and alternative energy technologies and related R&D;
poziva države članice, naj uskladijo politične ukrepe za spopadanje z višjimi cenami nafte; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi analizo na podlagi političnih ukrepov, s katerimi se države članice soočajo z izzivi visokih cen nafte in ki so se v preteklosti izkazali za uspešne;
Invites the Member States to coordinate policy interventions in tackling oil price increases; calls on the Commission to come up with an analysis based on Member States’ ‘best practice’ policy measures in their response to high oil price challenges;
poziva Svet, naj si prizadeva za sporazum o nadaljnjih pomembnih ukrepih za resnično liberaliziran notranji energetski trg;
Calls on the Council to push for an agreement on the next key steps towards achieving a truly liberalized Energy internal market;
ki ga predlagajo Jean Lambert, Elisabeth Schroedter, Sepp Kusstatscher, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg in Bart Staes
by Jean Lambert, Elisabeth Schroedter, Sepp Kusstatscher, Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg and Bart Staes
ob upoštevanju socialnega svežnja, ki ga je predstavila Komisija 2. julija 2008 in je vseboval njeno sporočilo o „Prenovljeni socialni agendi: priložnost, dostopnost in solidarnost v Evropi 21. stoletja“ (KOM(2008)412), ter nekatere druge nezakonodajne predloge,
having regard to the Social Package presented by the Commission on 2 July 2008 containing the Commission Communication on the 'Renewed social agenda: Opportunities, access and solidarity in 21st century placeEurope' (COM(2008) 412) and several other non-legislative proposals,
ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevah Viking Line, Laval, Rüffert in Komisija proti Luksemburgu ter kontroverznih političnih razprav o njih,
having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities on the Viking Line, Laval, Rüffert and Commission v Luxembourg cases and the controversial political debate thereon,
ob upoštevanju listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ker so temeljne pravice razlog za obstoj Evrope in socialnih politik,
whereas fundamental rights are the raison d’être of placeEurope and social policies,
ker socialni sveženj vsebuje številne pobude, ki jih je Parlament zahteval že več let,
whereas the Social Package contains a number of initiatives which Parliament had called for over several years,
ker izraz „socialni sveženj“ obljublja več kot zagotavlja, saj so bili nekateri dokumenti, predstavljeni 2. julija, objavljeni v različnem času in so sedaj predstavljeni kot sveženj skupnih ukrepov in ker se to zdi „premalo in prepozno“,
whereas the name 'Social Package' promises more than it delivers, as the publication of some of the documents presented on 2 July had been promised at different times and they are now presented as a package of joint measures; whereas this appears as 'too little too late',
ker je Sodišče evropskih skupnosti leta 2008 sprejelo sklepe, ki so odločilni za pripravo in uporabo socialnih standardov v EU,
whereas in 2008 the European Court of Justice has taken decisions which are decisive for realising and implementing social standards in the EU,
ker Komisija, kljub resnemu socialnemu položaju z vedno večjo brezposelnostjo in visoko stopnjo revščine in socialne izključenosti, še naprej daje izključni poudarek rasti in delovnim mestom,
whereas despite the urgent social situation, with increasing unemployment and high rates of poverty and social exclusion, the Commission’s exclusive emphasis on growth and jobs remains unchanged,
Obnovljena socialna agenda
Renewed Social Agenda
pozdravlja namero Komisije, da dosega napredek z novo socialno agendo; ugotavlja, da nujno potrebno uresničiti obljubo socialne Evrope; zahteva, da mora pravo evropsko socialno agendo sestavljati skladen niz ukrepov in instrumentov; zahteva, da temeljne pravice vodijo vse odločitve, ki se sprejemajo na ravni Evropske unije;
Welcomes the intention of the Commission to move forward with a new social agenda; sees the urgent need to truly deliver on Social Europe; demands that a true European Social Agenda should consist of a coherent set of actions and instruments; demands that fundamental rights guide all decisions taken at European Union level;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkanja usklajenosti in usmeritve pobud, ki so bile predstavljene v okviru socialne agende;
Is concerned about the lack of either coherence or direction in the initiatives presented in the context of the Renewed Social Agenda;
poziva Svet, naj v sodelovanju s Parlamentom predlaga socialni pakt za boj proti diskriminaciji, pospeševanje enakosti, boj proti revščini, krepitev socialne infrastrukture, vključitev socialnih vprašanj in ponovno vzpostavitev ravnotežja med temeljnimi pravicami in tržnimi svoboščinami kot pravi napredek v primerjavi s tako imenovanim socialnim paketom;
Calls upon the Council in cooperation with Parliament to put forward a Social Pact to fight discrimination, promote equality, combat poverty, strengthen the social infrastructure, mainstream social issues and restore the balance between fundamental rights and market freedoms as a true move forward compared to the so-called Social Package;
Direktiva o čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu
Directive on cross-border health care
ostaja prepričan, da bo direktiva o čezmejnem zdravstvenem varstvu izboljšala čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo, kjer bo to potrebno;
Remains to be convinced that the Directive on cross-border health care will improve cross-border health care where necessary;
pozdravlja študijo Komisije o „Kakovosti in enakosti dostopa do storitev zdravstvenega varstva“; poudarja dejstvo, da čezmejno zdravstveno varstvo lahko najde svoje meje tam, kjer ogroža prost in splošen dostop vsakomur;
Welcomes the Commission study on 'Quality in and Equality of Access to Healthcare Services'; points to the fact that cross-border health care may come up against its limits where it endangers free and universal access for everybody;
meni, da morajo ukrepi, sprejeti na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, upoštevati sposobnost preživetja in finančno vzdržnost sistemov socialne varnosti držav članic ter spoštovati subsidiarnost, da bi izboljšali dostop do zdravstvenega varstva ter ohranili visoke standarde preskrbe z zdravstvenim varstvom;
Considers that action taken in the area of cross-border health care should take into account the viability and financial sustainability of Member States' social security systems and respect subsidiarity while aiming to improve access to health care and maintain high standards of health care provision;
priznava potrebo po večji jasnosti v zvezi z vprašanji, kot so pravna odgovornost v korist tistih, ki dostopajo do zdravstvenega varstva v drugih državah članicah;
Recognises the need for greater clarity in relation to issues such as legal liability for the benefit of those accessing health care in other Member States;
priznava tudi, da je treba pojasniti vprašanja, povezana z opredelitvami, ki jih je uvedlo Sodišče evropskih skupnosti, kot so razlika med bolnišnično in nebolnišnično oskrbo in tudi povračilo za oskrbo v okviru nacionalnih sistemov zdravstvenega varstva, ki jo zajemata Uredba (EGS) št. 1408/71 in nova Uredba (ES) št. 833/04;
Recognises also the need to clarify issues relating to definitions brought into play by the ECJ, such as the difference between hospital and non-hospital care, and also relating to reimbursement for care provided under national health care schemes, as covered by Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 and the new Regulation (EC) No 883/2004;
Direktiva o evropskem svetu delavcev
European Works Council Directive
ugotavlja, da je bilo preoblikovanje direktive o evropskem svetu delavcev končno objavljeno in obžaluje precejšnjo zamudo pri njeni objavi;
Notes that the recast of the European Works Council Directive has finally been published and regrets the considerable delay in its publication;
obžaluje tudi omejeno naravo preoblikovanja, zaradi česar se ne more obravnavati nekaterih pomembnih vprašanj;
Regrets also the limited nature of the recast, which means that certain crucial issues may not be addressed;
vztraja, da je pravica do uspešnega in učinkovitega obveščanje ter posvetovanja ključna za ustvarjanju enakih pogojev za delodajalce in delojemalce na mednarodni ravni; opozarja na pomanjkljivosti preoblikovanja, ki zadeva pravico do obveščanja in posvetovanja ter zahteva, naj Svet izboljša preoblikovano direktivo v tesnem sodelovanju s Parlamentom;
Maintains that efficient and effective information and consultation rights are key when creating a level playing field for both sides of industry at transnational level; points to shortcomings in the recast as regards information and consultation rights and calls upon the Council to improve the recast Directive in close cooperation with Parliament;
Protidiskriminacijska direktiva
Anti-discrimination Directive
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija ukrepala na odločen poziv Parlamenta k pripravi protidiskriminacijske direktive, ki bo zajemala vse štiri razloge, ki jih je predvidel Parlament v členu 13; zahteva, naj Komisija preuči, če je diskriminacija zaradi spola prepovedana na istih področjih kot diskriminacija zaradi drugih razlogov;
Is delighted that the Commission has acted on Parliament's strong call for an anti-discrimination directive that covers all four grounds which Parliament requested under Article 13; requests that the Commission study whether discrimination based on sex is prohibited in the same areas as discrimination based on the other grounds;
opozarja Svet na dejstvo, da je ta direktiva pomembna za izvajanje člena 13(1); zato zahteva, naj Svet ohrani glavno idejo predloga Komisije, to je, da se zajame vse razloge za diskriminacijo ter da ni treba uvesti hierarhije diskriminacije;
Alerts the Council to the fact that this Directive is essential in order to implement Article 13(1); therefore requests that the Council maintain the key approach of the Commission proposal, namely that all grounds of discrimination are covered and that no hierarchy of discrimination should be introduced;
zahteva, naj Svet v sedanjem osnutku omeji obseg klavzul o izjemi;
Requests that the Council limit the number of exception clauses in the current draft;
Vključevanje protidiskriminacije
Mainstreaming anti-discrimination
pozdravlja pobude v ta namen, vendar opozarja, da je treba poleg starševskega dopusta obravnavati tudi dopust za druge namene nege;
Welcomes the initiatives to this end but points out the need to address not only parental leave but leave for other caring purposes;
poudarja, da spremembe zakonodaje ne smejo služiti omejevanju pravic posameznih zaposlenih;
Stresses that changes in legislation must not serve to lessen the rights of individual employees;
Sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti
ECJ rulings
meni, da predlagani forum ne more nadomestiti jasnosti zakonodaje glede pravic delavcev in spoštovanja kolektivnih pogodb, zahteva, naj se priznajo te temeljne pravice ter, kjer je to potrebno, ustrezno revidira obstoječo zakonodajo; s tem v zvezi zahteva revizijo direktive o napotitvi delavcev;
Considers that the proposed Forum cannot substitute for legislative clarity concerning the rights of workers and respect for collective bargaining agreements; requests that these fundamental rights be recognised and that, where necessary, existing legislation be revised accordingly; demands in this context a revision of the Posting Directive;
Dvoletno poročilo o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena
Biennial report on social services of general interest
je seznanjen z dvoletnim poročilom o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena; poudarja, da imajo socialne in zdravstvene storitve pomembno vlogo v naši družbi in prispevajo k spodbujanju kohezije, zaposlovanja, socialne vključenosti in gospodarske rasti;
Takes note of the Biennial Report on social services of general interest; stresses that social and health services play a vital role in our societies and help promote cohesion, employment, social inclusion and economic growth;
ostaja prepričan, da potrebujejo zdravstvene in socialne storitve posebno varstvo na notranjem trgu, kar v sporočilu ni omenjeno, ter pravni okvir o storitvah splošnega pomena v podporo varovanju temeljnih pravic;
Remains convinced that health and social services need special protection within the internal market, which is not mentioned in the communication, and that a legal framework for services of general interest will be supportive in safeguarding fundamental rights;
obžaluje popolno odsotnost zakonodajne pobude s strani Komisije glede priznanja in varovanja socialnih in zdravstvenih storitev splošnega pomena;
Deplores the absolute lack of any legislative initiative by the Commission regarding the recognition and safeguarding of social and health services of general interest;
Učinkovitost javne porabe
Efficiency of public spending