natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vključitev rezultatov revizij v postopke upravljanja mora biti pospremljena s priporočili za izboljšanje upravljanja programov.
The inclusion of audit results in management procedures should be accompanied by the development of recommendations designed to improve programme management.
Kako bi lahko izboljšali sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem, državnimi revizijskimi organi in Evropskim parlamentom (Odbor za proračunski nadzor) pri revidiranju proračuna EU?
How could cooperation between the Court of Auditors, the national audit institutions and the European Parliament (Committee on Budgetary Control) on auditing of the EU budget be improved?
Dejstvo, da se proračun Evropske unije napaja s sredstvi držav članic, že samo po sebi pomeni, da so nacionalni parlamenti in nacionalni revizijski organi (ponavadi računska sodišča) vključeni v vse revizijske postopke.
We need to take as our starting point the fact that the EU's budget resources come from the Member States, which means that national parliaments and national auditing bodies (usually the national courts of auditors) are automatically implicated in any auditing process.
Upoštevati je treba tudi, da velik delež odhodkov za evropske programe (več kot 80 %) izvršujejo nacionalni organi.
It should also be borne in mind that a substantial part of spending on European programmes (over 80%) is carried out by national authorities.
Zato je izjemno pomembno zbrati čim več informacij o delovanju nacionalnih računskih sodišč.
This makes it extremely important to gather as much information as possible about the activities of the national courts.
Eden od ukrepov, s katerimi bi lahko poglobili sodelovanje med omenjenimi organi, bi bilo lahko povečanje vloge odbora za stike med predsedniki računskih sodišč Evropske unije.
One measure which could be useful in promoting cooperation between these bodies would be to strengthen the role of the Contact Committee of the presidents of all the European courts of auditors.
Menim, da Lizbonska pogodba ponuja zelo zanimive možnosti za sodelovanje na tem področju, zlasti kar zadeva vlogo nacionalnih parlamentov.
I believe that the Lisbon Treaty provides us with very useful instruments for collaboration in this sphere, particularly where the role of national parliaments is concerned.
Ena od prednostnih nalog bi morala biti torej izboljšanje obveščanja in dodelitev konkretnih nadzornih nalog nacionalnim parlamentom.
It should be a priority task to improve information and give specific content to national parliamentary control
Temeljni pogoj za to je razviti in uporabljati izjave nacionalnih organov o uporabi evropskih sredstev ter revizije uporabe teh sredstev v posameznih državah, ob primernem usklajevanju in ob uporabi standardnih modelov uspešnosti, ki bi izboljšali raven sodelovanja med organi.
A basic requirement will be to encourage the development and use of declarations by national bodies on the use of European funds and audits of their implementation in each State, properly coordinated and using standardised performance models as a means of improving the level of cooperation amongst all the agencies involved.
Seveda, saj brez podpore Parlamenta ne bi mogel opravljati nalog, ki se pričakujejo od računskega sodnika.
Yes, since without Parliament's support I would be unable to carry out my duties as a Member of the Court.
o imenovanju Vítorja Manuela da Silve Caldeire za člana Računskega sodišča
on the nomination of Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira as a Member of the Court of Auditors
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS VÍTORJA MANUELA DA SILVE CALDEIRE
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITÆ OF Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira
PRILOGA 2: POVZETEK IZKUŠENJ VítorJA ManuelA da SilvE CaldeirE KOT ČLANA SODIŠČA IN CILJI ZA PRIHODNJI MANDAT
ANNEX 2: SUMMARY BY Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira OF EXPERIENCE AS A COURT MEMBER AND OBJECTIVES FOR A FUTURE MANDATE
– ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je posvetoval s Svetom ( C7‑0344/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0344/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je Odboru za proračunski nadzor na seji dne 23. novembra 2011 predstavil kandidat, ki ga Svet predlaga za člana Računskega sodišča,
– having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 Novemner 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7‑0423/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0423/2011 ),
A. ker Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira izpolnjuje pogoje, ki jih določa člen 286(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
A. whereas Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU;
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS VÍTORJA MANUELA DA SILVE CALDEIRE
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITÆ OF Vítor Manuel da Silva Caldeira
Rojen v Campu Maiorju (Portugalska) leta 1960.
Born in Campo Maior (Portugal) in 1960.
Diplomiral iz prava (Univerza v Lizboni, Portugalska).
Graduate in Law (Lisbon University, Portugal).
Podiplomska specializacija iz evropskih študij (Evropski inštitut, Pravna fakulteta, Univerza v Lizboni).
Postgraduate qualification in European Studies (European Institute, Faculty of Law, Lisbon University).
Predavatelj na Pravni fakulteti, Univerza v Lizboni (1983–1984) in na Višjem inštitutu za nove poklice (1996–1999).
Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, Lisbon University (1983-1984) and at the Higher Institute for New Professions (1996-1999).
1984-2000: zaposlen na Generalnem inšpektoratu za finance (IGF) kot inšpektor za finance/direktor (1989–1995) in kot generalni podinšpektor za finance od leta 1995 do februarja 2000.
1984-2000: employed at the Inspectorate-General for Finance (IGF), as Inspector of Finance/Director (1989-1995) and Sub-Inspector‑General of Finance from 1995 to February 2000.
Od leta 1995 odgovoren za področje IGF za usklajevanje inšpekcije Skupnosti in notranjega inšpekcijskega sistema za državno finančno upravo, kar vključuje naslednje dejavnosti: predsedovanje medresorskemu odboru za usklajevanje in inšpekcijo sistema financiranja EKUJS (jamstveni del), sodelovanje pri delu skupine osebnih predstavnikov ministrov za finance za dobro gospodarsko upravljanje (SEM 2000) in ad hoc delovnih skupin Sveta za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boj proti goljufijam, članstvo v portugalski delegaciji v svetovalnem odboru Evropske komisije za usklajevanje preprečevanja goljufij (COCOLAF).
From 1995, responsible for the IGF's area of coordination of Community inspection and the system of internal inspection of the State's financial administration, carrying out the following activities: Chairman of the Interministerial Committee for Coordination and Inspection of the EAGGF (Guarantee) Financing System; participant in the work of the Group of Personal Representatives of Finance Ministers for sound economic management (SEM 2000) and in ad hoc Council working groups on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud; member of the Portuguese delegation to the Advisory Committee for Coordination of the Fight Against Fraud (COCOLAF) under the aegis of the European Commission.
Svetovalec OECD za pobudo SIGMA (podpora za izboljšanje vodenja in upravljanja v državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope) z misijami na finančnih ministrstvih Češke (1997), Poljske (1998) in Estonije (1999).
Adviser to the OECD for the initiative known as SIGMA (Support for Improvement in Governance and Management in Central and Eastern European Countries), with missions to the finance ministries of the Czech Republic (1997), Poland (1998) and Estonia (1999).
Član Evropskega računskega sodišča od marca 2000, do konca leta 2001 odgovoren za revizijo bančnih dejavnosti EU, vključno z Evropsko skupnostjo za premog in jeklo, Evropskimi šolami, decentraliziranimi organi in Agencijo za oskrbo Euratom.
Member of the European Court of Auditors since March 2000, with responsibility up to the end of 2001 for auditing the EU's banking activities, including the ECSC, the European Schools, the decentralised bodies and the Euratom Supply Agency.
Od januarja 2002 do 8. marca 2006 član Sodišča, odgovoren za izjavo o zanesljivosti (DAS) in poročevalec za Mnenje Sodišča št. 2/2004 o modelu enotne revizije (in o predlogu okvira notranje kontrole Skupnosti).
From January 2002 to 8 March 2006, Member of the Court responsible for its Statement of Assurance (DAS) and rapporteur for the Court's opinion No 2/2004 on the single audit model (and the proposal for a Community internal control framework).
Marca 2005 izvoljen za doajena skupine CEAD (koordinacija, komunikacija, vrednotenje, zanesljivost, razvoj) in od 9. marca 2006 do 15. januarja 2008 član Sodišča, odgovoren za oddelek ADAR (metodologija revidiranja in priprava poročil).
In March 2005, elected Dean of the CEAD Group (Coordination, Communication, Evaluation, Assurance and Development) and the member responsible for the ADAR (Audit Development and Reports) Division from 9 March 2006 to 15 January 2008.
16. januarja 2008 izvoljen za predsednika Računskega sodišča za mandat treh let.
Elected President of the Court of Auditors on 16 January 2008 for a three-year term of office.
12. januarja 2011 ponovno izvoljen za drugi triletni mandat.
Re‑elected on 12 January 2011 for a second three-year term.
Kot predsednik Sodišča je odgovoren za nadzor nad izvajanjem dela Sodišča, odnose z institucijami Evropske unije, vrhovnimi revizijskimi institucijami in mednarodnimi revizijskimi organizacijami ter za pravne zadeve in notranjo revizijo.
As President, he is responsible for supervising the performance of the Court's work, for relations with the European Union's institutions, for relations with the Supreme Audit Institutions and international auditing organisations, for legal affairs and for the internal audit.
Od reorganizacije Sodišča 1. junija 2010 je predsednik upravnega odbora.
Since 1 June 2010, following the reorganisation of the Court, has been Chairman of the Administrative Committee.
Član skupnega revizijskega odbora Europola (2002–2004).
Member of Europol's Joint Audit Committee (2002-2004).
Trenutno član svetovalnega odbora Akademije za evropsko pravo (Trier).
Currently a member of the Advisory Committee of the Academy of European Law (Trier).
Kot govornik vabljen na različne konference in seminarje.
Invited speaker at various conferences and seminars.
Objavil članke o javnih financah, finančni kontroli in reviziji.
Has published articles on public finances, financial control and auditing.
Biti član Evropskega računskega sodišča (ERS) je hkrati čast in velika odgovornost.
It is both a privilege and a great responsibility to serve as a Member of the European Court of Auditors (ECA).
ERS kot zunanji revizor Unije opravlja pomembno nalogo.
The ECA has an important mission to fulfil as the external auditor of the Union.
Od marca 2000, ko sem postal član Sodišča, sem si prizadeval pomagati ERS pri izpolnjevanju te naloge v različnih vlogah, med drugim tudi kot sedanji predsednik ERS.
Since becoming a Member in March 2000, I have strived to help the ECA to fulfil that mission in many roles including as the ECA’s current President.
Izkušnje kot član ERS
Experience as a Member of the ECA
Svoj prvi mandat sem začel marca 2000 kot član Sodišča, odgovoren za revizijo bančnih dejavnosti in agencij EU.
I began my first mandate in March 2000 as the Member responsible for the audit of the EU's banking activities and Agencies.
Januarja 2002 sem postal "član za DAS", odgovoren za revizijo letnih računovodskih izkazov EU in izjavo o zanesljivosti.
In January 2002, I became the “DAS Member” responsible for the audit of the EU’s annual accounts and the Statement of Assurance.
Bil sem tudi član poročevalec za mnenje Sodišča o "enotni reviziji", ki je bilo spodbuda za integriran okvir notranje kontrole za uporabo sredstev EU, ki ga je kasneje razvila Komisija s podporo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
I was also the reporting Member for the Court’s “Single audit" opinion that inspired the Integrated Internal Control Framework for the use of EU funds subsequently developed by the Commission with the support of the European Parliament and Council.
Na začetku svojega drugega mandata, marca 2006, sem postal doajen skupine CEAD in član Sodišča, odgovoren za metodologijo revidiranja in pripravo poročil.
At the start of my second mandate, in March 2006, I became the Dean of the CEAD Group and the Member responsible for audit development and reports.
Januarja 2008 sem bil izvoljen za predsednika ERS za mandat treh let, ki je bil obnovljen januarja 2011.
In January 2008, I was elected President of the ECA for a term of three years which was renewed in January 2011 for a further three years.
ERS je med mojim predsedovanjem zaključilo proces pomembne notranje reforme, ki je vključeval medsebojni strokovni pregled.
During my presidency, the ECA has completed an important internal reform process which included a peer review.
Tako je ERS popravilo svoja notranja pravila, da bi izboljšalo postopek odločanja in učinkovitost, ter uvedlo sistem senatov za sprejemanje poročil in mnenj in boljšo upravljavsko strukturo.
As a result, the ECA amended its internal rules in order to improve decision making and efficiency, introducing a system of Chambers for the adoption of reports and opinions as well as a better management structure.
Sprejelo je tudi svojo prvo revizijsko strategijo, izboljšalo rezultate in veliko prispevalo k javnim podatkovnim zbirkam o reformi proračuna EU, javnem naročanju in dogodkih v zvezi z gospodarskim upravljanjem EU.
It also adopted its first audit strategy, improved existing output, and made significant contributions to the public debates on EU budget reform, public procurement, and developments in EU economic governance.
Moje prednostne naloge bi bile:
My priorities would be to:
· zagotoviti, da se strategija Sodišča za obdobje od leta 2009 do leta 2012 uspešno zaključi in da se v celoti obravnavajo priporočila medsebojnega strokovnega pregleda iz leta 2008;
· Ensure the Court’s strategy for 2009 to 2012 is successfully completed and that the recommendations of the 2008 peer review are fully addressed.
· usmerjati razvoj nove daljnovidne strategije za ERS za obdobje po letu 2013, ki si prizadeva za to, da bosta Sodišče in njegovo delo bolj ustrezala pričakovanjem zainteresiranih strani in glavnim izzivom, s katerimi se sooča EU;
· Steer the development of a new outward looking strategy for the ECA after 2013 that focuses on making the Court and its work more relevant to its stakeholders’ expectations and to the main challenges that the EU is facing.
· izkoristiti nova notranja pravila ERS za bolj prilagodljivo uporabo njegovih virov in nadaljnje izboljšanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti;
· Take advantage of the ECA’s new internal rules to use its resources more flexibly and to further improve efficiency and effectiveness.
· spodbujati uspešno javnofinančno odgovornost in revizijo javnih financ v EU s sodelovanjem z Evropskim parlamentom in drugimi institucijami EU in nacionalnimi institucijami, vključno z vrhovnimi revizijskimi institucijami;
· Promote effective public accountability and public audit in the EU by working with the European Parliament as well as other EU and national institutions, including Supreme Audit Institutions.
· izboljšati komuniciranje ERS z njegovimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, da bo njegovo sporočilo slišano in njegov težko zaslužen ugled zaščiten.
· Improve the ECA’s communication with its stakeholders in order to ensure it gets its messages across and protects its hard earned reputation.
Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Andrea Cozzolino, Tamás Deutsch, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Mulder, Jan Olbrycht, Crescenzio Rivellini, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Andrea Cozzolino, Tamás Deutsch, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iliana Ivanova, Monica Luisa Macovei, Jan Mulder, Jan Olbrycht, Crescenzio Rivellini, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
o letnem poročilu o politiki konkurence EU
on the Annual Report on EU Competition Policy
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2010 ( KOM(2011)0328 ) in spremljajočega delovnega dokumenta Komisije ( SEC(2011)0690 ),
– having regard to the Commission Report on Competition Policy 2010 ( COM(2011)0328 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working paper ( SEC(2011)0690 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (uredba ES o združitvah)
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation)
UL L 24, 29.01.2004, str.
OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije o načinu določanja glob, naloženih v skladu s členom 23(2)(a) Uredbe št. 1/2003
– having regard to the Commission Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003
2. (smernice za nalaganje glob),
2. (the Fining Guidelines),
UL C 270, 25.10.2008, str.
OJ C 270, 25.10.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2008 o dokapitalizaciji finančnih institucij v trenutni finančni krizi: omejitev pomoči na najmanjšo potrebno in zaščitni ukrepi za preprečevanje neupravičenega izkrivljanja konkurence
– having regard to the Commission communication of 5 December 2008 entitled ‘The recapitalisation of financial institutions in the current financial crisis: limitation of aid to the minimum necessary and safeguards against undue distortions of competition’
UL C 10, 15.01.2009, str.
OJ C 10, 15.1.2009, p.
2. (sporočilo o dokapitalizaciji),
2. (the Recapitalisation Communication),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. februarja 2009 o obravnavanju oslabljenih sredstev v bančnem sektorju Skupnosti
– having regard to the Commission communication of 25 February 2009 entitled ‘The treatment of impaired assets in the Community banking sector’
UL C 72, 26.03.2009, str.
OJ C 72, 26.3.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. julija 2009 o ponovni vzpostavitvi uspešnega poslovanja in oceni ukrepov prestrukturiranja v finančnem sektorju v sedanji krizi na podlagi pravil o državni pomoči
– having regard to the Commission communication of 23 July 2009 entitled ‘The return to viability and the assessment of restructuring measures in the financial sector in the current crisis under the State aid rules’
UL C 195, 19.08.2009, str.
OJ C 195, 19.8.2009, p.
9. (sporočilo o prestrukturiranju),
9. (the Restructuring Communication),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 17. decembra 2008 o začasnem okviru Skupnosti za ukrepe državne pomoči v podporo dostopa do sredstev v trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi
– having regard to the Commission communication of 17 December 2008 entitled ‘Temporary Community framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis’
UL C 16, 22.01.2009, str.
OJ C 16, 22.1.2009, p.
1. (originalni začasni okvir),
1. (the original Temporary Framework),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 1. decembra 2010 o začasnem okviru Unije za ukrepe državne pomoči v podporo dostopa do sredstev v trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi
– having regard to the Commission communication of 1 December 2010 entitled ‘Temporary Union framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis’
– ob upoštevanju študije iz junija 2011 o državni pomoči - krizna pravila za finančni sektor in za resnično gospodarstvo
– having regard to the study, commissioned by Parliament, of June 2011 entitled ‘State aid – Crisis rules for the financial sector and the real economy’
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2011 o učinkih začasnih pravil o državni pomoči, ki so bila sprejeta v okviru finančne in gospodarske krize ( SEC(2011)1126 ),
– having regard to the Commission Staff working paper of 5 October 2011 entitled ‘The effects of temporary State aid rules adopted in the context of the financial and economic crisis’ ( SEC(2011)1126 ),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka uredbe Komisije o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 659/1999 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo člena 93 Pogodbe ES zaradi poenostavitve obveznosti poročanja držav članic,
– having regard to the draft Commission regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty as regards the simplification of Member States’ reporting obligations,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta osebja Komisije o javnih posvetovanjih: Usklajenemu evropskemu pristopu h kolektivnim tožbam naproti ( SEC(2011)0173 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘Public Consultation: Towards a Coherent European Approach to Collective Redress’ ( SEC(2011)0173 ),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta GD za konkurenco o najboljši praksi v postopkih v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 PDEU
– having regard to the DG Competition document entitled ‘Best Practices on the conduct of proceedings concerning Articles 101 and 102 TFEU’
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta GD za konkurenco o smernicah za postopke pooblaščencev za zaslišanje v postopkih v skladu s členoma 101 in 102 PDEU
– having regard to the DG Competition document entitled ‘Guidance on procedures of the Hearing Officers in proceedings relating to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU’
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta GD za konkurenco o najboljših praksah za predložitev gospodarskih dokazov in za zbiranje podatkov v primerih, ki so povezani z uporabo členov 101 in 102 PDEU, in v primeru združitve
– having regard to the DG Competition document entitled ‘Best practices for the submission of economic evidence and data collection in cases concerning the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU and in merger cases’
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 20. novembra
– having regard to the Framework Agreement of 20 November 2010 on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission
47. (v nadaljnjem besedilu: okvirni sporazum), predvsem njegovih odstavkov 12
47. (referred to hereinafter as ‘the Framework Agreement’), in particular paragraphs 12
„Vsak član Komisije zagotovi reden in neposreden pretok informacij med njim in predsednikom zadevnega parlamentarnega odbora.“ in 16
‘Each Member of the Commission shall make sure that there is a regular and direct flow of information between the Member of the Commission and the chair of the relevant parliamentary committee.’ and 16
„V treh mesecih po sprejetju resolucije parlamenta Komisija v pisni obliki sporoči Parlamentu informacije o ukrepih, sprejetih kot odgovor na posebne zahteve, ki jih je Parlament v svojih resolucijah naslovil nanjo, vključno v primerih, ko mnenj Parlamenta ni mogla upoštevati.“ ,
‘Within 3 months after the adoption of a parliamentary resolution, the Commission shall provide information to Parliament in writing on action taken in response to specific requests addressed to it in Parliament’s resolutions, including in cases where it has not been able to follow Parliament’s views. [...]’ thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2007 o zeleni knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES
– having regard to its resolutions of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules
Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0152 . in z dne 26. marca 2009 o beli knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES
Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0152 . and of 26 March 2009 on the White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules