natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je predsednik Kibaki dne 2. januarja 2009 sprejel nov osnutek zakona o komunikacijah v Keniji iz leta 2008, ki spreminja zakon o komunikacijah v Keniji iz leta 1998,
whereas on 2 January 2009 President Kibaki assented to the Kenya Communications (Amendment) Bill 2008, which amended the Kenya Communications Act of 1998,
ker zakon, kot je zdaj, ne upošteva pravice do svobode izražanja in svobode tiska, ki je zapisana v Splošni deklaraciji o človekovih pravicah in se pojavlja v drugih mednarodnih konvencijah, ki jih je Kenija podpisala in ratificirala, vključno z Afriško listino o človekovih pravicah in pravicah ljudstev,
whereas the 2008 Act, as it stands, disregards the rights to freedom of expression and press freedom as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and echoed in other international conventions which Kenya has signed and ratified, including the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights,
ker sta najbolj problematična oddelka 88 in 46; ker oddelek 88 podeljuje ministru za informiranje velike pristojnosti za preiskavo medijskih organizacij, ki naj bi ogrožale nacionalno varnost, in uničenje njihove opreme za oddajanje; ker oddelek 46 daje državi pristojnost za urejanje vsebin, ki se prenašajo prek elektronskih medijev ali so objavljene v tiskanih medijih,
whereas the two main problematic sections are Sections 88 and 46; whereas Section 88 gives the Information Minister considerable powers to raid media organisations that are deemed to be a threat to national security and to dismantle their broadcasting equipment; whereas Section 46 gives the State the power to regulate contents to be aired and published by electronic and print media respectively,
ker naj bi po izjavi, ki jo je objavilo Združenje vzhodnoafriških novinarjev, ta zakon iz leta 2008 uvedel neposredno vladno cenzuro medijev,
whereas according to a press release issued by the East African Journalists' Association (EAJA), the 2008 media Act would introduce direct media censorship by the government,
ker se je predsednik vlade Odinga pridružil široki opoziciji proti zakonodaji; ker so vodje Oranžnega demokratičnega gibanja (ODM) nedavno imeli krizne pogovore in predsednika obtožili, da se o zakonu ni posvetoval s predsednikom vlade,
whereas Prime Minister Odinga has joined widespread opposition to the legislation; whereas Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) officials recently held crisis talks, claiming that the President had failed to consult the Prime Minister over the Act,
ker predsednikova zelena luč osnutku zakona po mnenju Kenijske komisije za človekove pravice pomeni, da velika koalicija ne deluje enoglasno,
whereas, according to the Kenyan National Commission for Human Rights, the presidential assent to the Bill indicates that the Grand Coalition is not working in unison,
ker je svoboda izražanja temeljna človekova pravica, kot je zapisano v členu 19 Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah,
whereas freedom of expression is a fundamental human right, as stated in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
ker so pred letom dni demonstracijam na cestah, do katerih je prišlo zaradi spornih predsedniških volitev v Keniji, sledili nemiri in etnični spopadi, v katerih je umrlo več kot 1.000 ljudi, 350.000 pa jih je ostalo brez strehe nad glavo,
whereas, a year ago, following flawed presidential elections in Kenya, street demonstrations led to riots and ethnic clashes that spread across the country, killing more than 1 000 people and leaving another 350 000 homeless,
obžaluje, da je predsednik Kibaki podpisal osnutek zakona o komunikacijah v Keniji in pri tem ni upošteval zadržkov, o katerih se je veliko poročalo;
Regrets the signing of the Kenya Communications (Amendment) Bill by President Kibaki, who neglected to take widely reported reservations about it into consideration at the time of its signature;
kljub vsemu pozdravlja zadnjo potezo predsednika Kibakija, da bo pregledal zakon in upošteval spremembe, ki jih predlagajo zaposleni na področju medijev;
Welcomes, however, President Kibaki's recent move to revise the Act and his gesture to consider amendments to the legislation proposed by members of the media;
ponavlja svojo zavezo svobodi tiska in temeljnim pravicam do svobode izražanja, obveščanja in združevanja; poudarja, da je dostop do informacij o različnih pogledih bistven za nudenje pravic državljanom;
Reiterates its commitment to press freedom and the fundamental rights of freedom of expression, information and association; stresses that access to information representing a plurality of opinion is essential for the empowerment of citizens;
poziva kenijsko vlado, naj sproži posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi, da se sprejme soglasje o tem, kako komunikacijske panoge najbolje urediti, ne da bi pri tem posegali v svobodo tiska; poziva predsednika Kibakija in predsednika vlade Odingo, naj storita vse za zagotovitev, da bo posodobljena različica novega zakona o medijih upoštevala načela svobode izražanja in obveščanja;
Calls on the Kenyan Government to initiate stakeholder consultations in order to build a consensus on how to better regulate the communications industry without interfering with press freedom; asks President Kibaki and Prime Minister Odinga to do their utmost to guarantee that any updated version of the new media Act will be compatible with the principles of freedom of expression and information;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic, vladi Kenije, sopredsednikoma skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU, Vzhodnoafriški skupnosti ter predsednikoma komisije in izvršnega sveta Afriške unije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States, the Government of Kenya, the Co-Presidents of the ACP EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly, the East African Community, and the Chairmen of the Commission and the Executive Council of the African Union.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2009 o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o podaljšanju Sporazuma o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Združenih držav Amerike ( KOM(2008)0581 – C6-0392/2008 – 2008/0184(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 February 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the extension of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America ( COM(2008)0581 – C6-0392/2008 – 2008/0184(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0581 ),
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0581 ),
ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0392/2008 ),
having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0392/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0006/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0006/2009 ),
odobri podaljšanje sporazuma;
Approves extension of the Agreement;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Združenih držav Amerike.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the United States of America.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2009 o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi sporazuma o podaljšanju Sporazuma o znanstvenem in tehnološkem sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Ruske federacije ( KOM(2008)0728 – C6-0456/2008 – 2008/0209(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 February 2009 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement on cooperation in science and technology between the European Community and the Government of the Russian Federation ( COM(2008)0728 – C6-0456/2008 – 2008/0209(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2008)0728 ),
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2008)0728 ),
ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0456/2008 ),
having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0456/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0005/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0005/2009 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in Ruske federacije.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Russian Federation.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2009 o divjini v Evropi ( 2008/2210(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 3 February 2009 on Wilderness in Europe ( 2008/2210(INI) )
(Direktiva o pticah),
(Birds Directive),
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
having regard to Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
(Direktiva o habitatih),
(Habitats Directive),
ob upoštevanju ekološkega omrežja posebnih ohranitvenih območij v Evropski uniji Natura 2000, oblikovanega z navedenima direktivama,
having regard to the European Union's ecological network of special areas of conservation established by the two above-mentioned Directives, called the "Natura 2000" network,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov devetega srečanja konference pogodbenic (COP 9) Konvencije o biotski raznovrstnosti,
having regard to the outcome of the ninth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 9) to the Convention on Biological Diversity,
ob upoštevanju poročila št. 3/2008 Evropske agencije za okolje z naslovom "Evropski gozdovi – razmere v ekosistemih in trajnostna raba",
having regard to the report No 3/2008 of the European Environment Agency (EEA) "European forests - ecosystem conditions and sustainable use",
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0478/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0478/2008 ),
ker je učinkovito varstvo in po potrebi obnova zadnjih evropskih območij divjine bistvenega pomena za zaustavitev zmanjševanja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010,
Whereas the effective protection and, where necessary, restoration of Europe's last wilderness areas are vital to halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010,
ker cilj zaustavitve zmanjševanja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 ne bo dosežen in ker se že čuti negativen družbeni in gospodarski vpliv zmanjševanja biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemskih storitev,
Whereas the target to halt the loss of biodiversity by 2010 will not be achieved and the negative social and economic impact of biodiversity loss and declining ecosystem services are already being felt,
ker bi Evropska unija morala graditi na sedanjih dosežkih, kot je Natura 2000, ter razvijati bistveno močnejši in ambicioznejši nov političen okvir za biotsko raznovrstnost po letu 2010,
Whereas the European Union should build on current achievements such as Natura 2000 and develop a significantly strengthened and ambitious new policy framework for biodiversity after 2010,
ker direktivi o pticah in habitatih zagotavljata trden in uporaben okvir za varstvo narave, skupaj z območji divjine, pred škodljivim razvojem,
Whereas the Birds and Habitats Directives provide a strong and workable framework for the protection of nature, including wilderness areas, from harmful developments,
ker cilji politike Evropske unije za biotsko raznovrstnost ter direktiv o pticah in habitatih še zdaleč niso ustrezno vključeni v sektorske politike, kot so kmetijstvo, regionalni razvoj, energija ali promet,
Whereas the objectives of the European Union's biodiversity policy and of the Birds and Habitats Directives are still far from being properly integrated in sectoral policies, such as agriculture, regional development, energy or transport,
ker številna območja divjine zagotavljajo pomembne zaloge ogljika, njihovo varstvo pa je pomembno za biotsko raznovrstnost ter za varstvo podnebja,
Whereas many wilderness areas provide important carbon stocks, whose protection is important both for biodiversity and for climate protection,
ker učinek invazivnih tujih vrst na biotsko raznovrstnost resno ogroža območja divjine, kjer zgodnje odkrivanje invazivnih vrst morda ni mogoče in kjer lahko pride do večje ekološke in gospodarske škode, še preden je mogoče ukrepati,
Whereas the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity constitute a particularly serious threat to wilderness areas, where early detection of invasive species may not be possible, and where significant ecological and economic damage may occur before action can be taken,
poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli, kaj je divjina; opredelitev mora upoštevati vidike, kot so ekosistemske storitve, ohranitvena vrednost, podnebne spremembe in trajnostna raba;
Calls on the Commission to define wilderness; the definition should address aspects such as ecosystem services, conservation value, climate change and sustainable use;
poziva Komisijo, naj pooblasti Evropsko agencijo za okolje in druge ustrezne evropske organe, da kartirajo zadnja evropska območja divjine, da se opredeli sedanja razporeditev, raven biotske raznovrstnosti ter površina še neokrnjenih območij in območij z minimalno človeško dejavnostjo (razdeljenih v glavne habitatne tipe: področja divjine z gozdovi, v sladkih vodah in na morju);
Calls on the Commission to mandate the EEA and other relevant European bodies to map Europe's last wilderness areas, in order to ascertain the current distribution, level of biodiversity and cover of still-untouched areas as well as areas where human activities are minimal (divided into major habitats types: forest, freshwater and marine wilderness areas);
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi študijo o vrednosti in koristih varstva divjine; ta študija mora zlasti obravnavati vprašanja, povezana z ekosistemskimi storitvami, ravnjo biotske raznovrstnosti na območjih divjine, prilagajanjem podnebnim spremembam in trajnostnim turizmom, povezanim z naravo;
Calls on the Commission to undertake a study on the value and benefits of wilderness protection; the study should particularly address the issues of ecosystem services, the level of biodiversity of wilderness areas, climate change adaptation and sustainable nature tourism;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi strategijo EU o divjini, ki bo skladna z direktivama o pticah in habitatih, ter pri tem uporabi ekosistemski pristop, s katerim bo določila ogrožene vrste in biotope, ter določi prednostne naloge;
Calls on the Commission to develop an EU wilderness strategy, coherent with the Birds and Habitats Directives, using an ecosystem approach, identifying threatened species and biotopes, and setting priorities;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj oblikujejo območja divjine; poudarja, da so potrebna posebna sredstva za zmanjšanje razdrobljenosti, skrbno upravljanje območij, ponovno prepuščenih divjini, vzpostavitev mehanizmov in programov za nadomestila, ozaveščanje, dvig razumevanja ter uveljavitev pojmov v zvezi z divjino, kot je vloga prostih naravnih procesov in strukturnih elementov, ki nastanejo s takšnimi procesi, pri spremljanju in merjenju ugodnega ohranitvenega stanja; meni, da mora to delo potekati v sodelovanju z lokalnim prebivalstvom in zainteresiranimi stranmi;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop wilderness areas; stresses the need for the provision of special funding for reducing fragmentation, careful management of re-wilding areas, development of compensation mechanisms and programmes, raising awareness, building understanding and introducing wilderness-related concepts such as the role of free natural processes and structural elements resulting from such processes into the monitoring and measurement of favourable conservation status; considers that this work should be carried out in cooperation with the local population and other stakeholders;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sodelujejo z lokalnimi nevladnimi organizacijami, zainteresiranimi stranmi in lokalnim prebivalstvom pri predstavljanju divjine kot vrednote;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to co-operate with local non-governmental organisations, stakeholders and the local population to promote the value of wilderness;
poziva države članice, naj uvedejo in podprejo informacijske kampanje za ozaveščanje splošne javnosti o divjini in njenem pomenu ter spodbujajo stališče, da je varovanje biotske raznovrstnosti lahko v skladu z gospodarsko rastjo in zaposlovanjem;
Calls on the Member States to launch and support information campaigns to raise awareness among the general public about wilderness and its significance and to cultivate the perception that biodiversity protection can be compatible with economic growth and jobs;
poziva države članice, naj izmenjujejo izkušnje o najboljših praksah in pridobljena znanja o območjih divjine, tako da povežejo najpomembnejše evropske strokovnjake pri preučitvi pojma divjine v Evropski uniji ter uvrstitvi divjine med evropske teme;
Calls on the Member States to exchange their experiences of best practices and lessons learned about wilderness areas by bringing together key European experts to examine the concept of wilderness in the European Union and place wilderness on the European agenda;
ob upoštevanju izčrpno dokumentirane škode, ki jo turizem marsikje povzroča najdragocenejši evropski naravni dediščini, poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bo upravljanje turizma, tudi kadar gre za vodenje obiskovalcev po habitatih in živalstvu območja divjine, skrajno previdno ter da bodo pri tem v celoti uporabljene izkušnje o zmanjševanju njegovega vpliva, pridobljene znotraj in zunaj Evrope, in po potrebi upoštevan člen 6 Direktive o habitatih; preučiti je treba modele, po katerih na območjih divjine večinoma ni dovoljen dostop (razen za odobrene znanstvene raziskave), omejen del takega območja pa je odprt za visokokakovosten trajnostni turizem, ki temelji na izkušnjah z divjino in lokalnim skupnostim prinaša gospodarske koristi;
In view of the well-documented damage which tourism has inflicted, and continues to inflict, on a great deal of Europe's most precious natural heritage, calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that tourism, even if focused on introducing visitors to the habitats and wildlife of a wilderness area, is handled with extreme care, making full use of experience gained inside and outside Europe on how to minimise its impact, and with reference, where appropriate, to Article 6 of the Habitats Directive; models where wilderness areas are for the most part closed to access (outside of permitted scientific research), but where a limited part is opened to sustainable high-quality tourism based on the wilderness experience and economically benefiting local communities, should be considered;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj namenijo posebno pozornost učinkovitemu varstvu območij divjine;
Calls on the Commission and Member States to devote special attention to the effective protection of wilderness areas;
poziva Komisijo, naj ugotovi, katere so neposredne nevarnosti v zvezi z območji divjine;
Calls on the Commission to detect immediate threats linked to wilderness areas;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje ustrezna priporočila, ki bodo države članice usmerila glede najboljših pristopov za zagotovitev zaščite naravnih habitatov;
Calls on the Commission to develop appropriate recommendations that provide guidance to the Member States on the best approaches for ensuring the protection of natural habitats;
in Okvirne direktive o morski strategiji Direktiva 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za delovanje Skupnosti na področju vodne okoljske politike (UL L 164, 25.6.2008, str.
and the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p.
ter z boljšim financiranjem, da bi preprečili uničenje teh območij zaradi škodljivega, neekološkega razvoja;
in a more effective and more consistent way, with better financing, in order to avoid the destruction of these areas by harmful, non-sustainable development;
pozdravlja pregled direktiv o pticah in habitatih, da bi jih po potrebi prilagodili za boljšo zaščito ogroženih vrst in biotopov;
Welcomes the review of the Birds and Habitats Directives with a view, where necessary, to amending them to provide better protection for threatened species and biotopes;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme partnersko pobudo Wild Europe, pri kateri sodeluje več naravovarstvenih organizacij, ki se posebej ukvarjajo z območji divjine ali poldivjine, med drugimi Mednarodna zveza za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov (IUCN), Svetovna komisija za zaščitena območja (IUCN-WCPA), Svetovni sklad za naravo (WWF), partnerska organizacija Birdlife International in pobuda PAN Parks;
Calls on the Commission to accept the Wild Europe Initiative, a partnership of several nature conservation organisations including IUCN, IUCN-WCPA, WWF, Birdlife International and PAN Parks, with a strong interest in wild lands or nearly wild areas;
poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z zainteresiranimi stranmi oblikuje smernice za varovanje, upravljanje, trajnostno uporabo, spremljanje in financiranje področij divjine v okviru omrežja Natura 2000, zlasti ob upoštevanju prihodnjih izzivov, kot so podnebne spremembe, nezakonita sečnja in vedno večje povpraševanje po blagu;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with stakeholders, to develop guidelines on how to protect, manage, use sustainably, monitor and finance wilderness areas under the Natura 2000 network, especially with regard to upcoming challenges such as climate change, illegal logging and increasing demand for goods;
izraža globoko zaskrbljenost glede evropske politike na področju biotske raznovrstnosti zaradi pomanjkanja finančnih sredstev za upravljanje omrežja Natura 2000; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi sofinanciranje Skupnosti za upravljanje območij v državah članicah, kot je predvideno v Direktivi o habitatih;
Expresses deep concerns for European biodiversity policy due to lack of funding for management of the Natura 2000 network; in this context, calls on the Commission to prepare, as provided for in the Habitats Directive, Community co-funding for the management of sites in Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj območjem divjine v okviru omrežja Natura 2000 določi posebno mesto in strožje varstvo;
Calls on the Commission to give a special status to and stricter protection for wilderness zones in the Natura 2000 network;
meni, da je treba okrepiti politiko razvoja podeželja in vključevanje varstva okolja v kmetijskem sektorju EU; vendar ocenjuje, da sklad za razvoj podeželja ne zadostuje za financiranje varovanja biotske raznovrstnosti in divjine v smislu sredstev ter načrtovanja in stroke;
Considers that rural development policy and the integration of environmental protection into the EU agricultural sector must be reinforced; judges, however, the Rural Development Fund insufficient to finance biodiversity and wilderness conservation in terms of resources and its programming and expertise;