natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zato meni, da bi bilo treba določeno število vmesnih in dolgoročnih posamičnih ciljev znova potrditi ali določiti, temeljili pa naj bi na previdnostnem načelu in bi bili ambiciozni in stvarni ter bi se ustrezno in sistematično uporabljali in spremljali; meni, da bi morali zlasti obravnavati tekoče negativne trende na področju rabe zemljišč in zemeljskih virov, prevoza, podnebnih sprememb, ribištva, uporabe fosilnih goriv ter izkoriščanja biološke raznovrstnosti ter spodbujati način prenosa, ločitev gospodarske rasti od prevoza, zmanjšanje učinka toplogrednih plinov v skladu s segrevanjem do največ +2°C v primerjavi s predindustrijskim obdobjem;
Considers, therefore, that a limited number of intermediate and long-term targets should either be reconfirmed or established, should be based on the precautionary principle and be ambitious and realistic in nature, and should then be properly and systematically applied and monitored; believes that they should address, in particular, current negative trends in the fields of land use and land resources, transport, climate change, fisheries, use of fossil fuels and depletion of biodiversity, and should also seek to encourage modal shift, the decoupling of economic growth from transport, and greenhouse-gas emission reductions in line with max+2°C warming as compared to pre-industrial levels;
podpira predlagani poudarek na prizadevanjih za merjenje učinkovitosti virov z uporabo evidence okoljskih virov; predlaga, da se nameni posebno pozornost pozornemu spremljanju ekoloških sledi v EU in svetu ter analizi okoljskega vpliva potrošnje in proizvodnje ter da se določi cilj sistematičnega zmanjševanja ekološke sledi v EU;
Supports the proposed new emphasis on seeking to measure resource efficiency through application of environmental resource accounting; suggests that special efforts should be made to monitor closely the ecological footprint of the EU in the world, analysing environmental impact from both the consumption and the production end, and setting as a target that the EU footprint be systematically reduced;
poleg tega pozdravlja predlog Komisije za evropsko leto boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi bolj specifične pobude in učinkovite ukrepe za izvajanje in s tem omogoči pravi napredek; ob tem kot primer navaja pobudo Komisije, katere cilj je preučiti vpliv starajoče se družbe, ki se zavzema za konkretne rešitve na podlagi sodelovanja različnih ravni političnega odločanja v EU in civilne družbe;
Welcomes, moreover, the Commission's proposal for a European Year of combating poverty and social exclusion; urges the Commission to put forward more specific initiatives and efficient implementation measures to enable real progress to be made; points in this connection, by way of example, to the Commission's initiative aimed at analysing the impact of an ageing society, which seeks to achieve concrete solutions based on the participation both of the various levels of political decision-makers in the EU and of civil society;
Izboljšati kakovost razvoja kot pogoj za Strategijo trajnostnega razvoja
Improving the quality of growth as a precondition for the SDS
meni, da je treba pomen, ki ga ima BDP pri merjenju napredka v družbi, uravnovesiti s skrbjo za kakovostne vidike razvoja, saj so ti pogoj za trajnostni razvoj; zato meni, da je treba doseči sporazum o omejenem nizu ključnih kazalcev trajnosti, ki jih je treba predstaviti in o njih veliko razpravljati med letnim pregledom STR; meni, da bi se morali ti kazalci nanašati na temeljne vidike kakovosti življenja ter omogočati količinske in sprotne ocene zdravja (kakovost in razporeditev zdravstvenega varstva, pričakovana življenjska doba, umrljivost otrok itd.), ozaveščanja (izobraževanje in kultura, dostop do IKT itd.), vključenosti (sodelovanje pri odločitvah družbe in družbenemu kapitalu itd.) in kakovosti okolja (onesnaževanje zraka in vode itd.);
Considers that the emphasis placed on GDP in measuring progress in society should be balanced by an equal concern about the qualitative aspects of growth, as this is a prerequisite for sustainable development; believes, therefore, that agreement needs to be reached on a limited set of key sustainability indicators to be presented and widely discussed at the yearly review of the SDS; considers that these indicators should pertain to fundamental aspects of the quality of life and should allow quantitative and prompt assessments of health (quality and distribution of health care, life expectancy, child mortality, etc.), awareness (education and culture, ICT access, etc.), inclusion (participation in society's decisions and social capital, etc.) and environmental quality (air and water pollution, etc.);
poziva, da se evropski socialni model nadalje razvija in da se predstavijo priporočila, ki iz njega izhajajo, naj države članice preprečijo "netrajnostne" trende, kot so revščina, socialna izključenost in posledice staranja prebivalstva; meni, da je treba v ta namen razviti kazalce socialnega položaja in jih vključiti v presojo vplivov trajnosti; poudarja, da Evropa potrebuje makroekonomski okvir za podporo trajnostnemu razvoju in okrepitev okolju prijazno notranje povpraševanje, pospešitev zaposlovanja ter socialne kohezije;
Calls for the further development of the European social model and for recommendations, on the basis of that model, that the Member States take action to counteract the "unsustainable" trends of poverty, social exclusion and the consequences of the ageing of society; considers that, to this end, social situation indicators should be developed which would then be included in the sustainability impact assessment; emphasises that Europe needs a macroeconomic framework to support sustainable development, strengthening environmentally friendly internal demand, employment and social cohesion;
meni, da je trajnostni razvoj gospodarska priložnost, in ne prisila, ter da bi bilo treba nanj gledati kot na spodbudo za tehnološke inovacije in naložbe; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi učinkovito usklajevanje razvojne strategije Unije , ki bo vključevala informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije ter tehnologije za trajnostni razvoj in premišljeno rast, ki učinkovito izrabljajo vire, tako v Skupnosti kot zunaj nje;
Considers that sustainable development should be seen more as an economic opportunity than as a constraint, and as a spur to technological innovation and investment; calls, therefore, upon the Commission to ensure effective coordination of the Union's growth strategies, integrating information and communications technologies and resource-efficient technologies for sustainable development and 'smart growth' both at home and abroad;
meni, da je treba družbo, ki temelji na znanju, ozaveščenosti in sodelovanju ter vključenosti in medosebnih odnosih, spodbujati tudi zunaj okvirov Lizbonske strategije; meni, da bo to družba višje kakovosti, ki lahko prek široke podpore IKT zmanjša povpraševanje po energiji in drugih naravnih virih;
Believes that a society built on knowledge, awareness and participation, as well as on inclusion and interpersonal relationships, should be promoted that goes beyond the Lisbon Agenda; considers that this will represent a higher quality society and one that, through extended support for ICT, can reduce demand for energy and other natural resources;
meni, da je treba STR sistematično spremljati, če želimo, da se ustrezno izvaja;
Believes that the SDS requires systematic monitoring if it is to be properly implemented;
namerava voditi redne plenarne razprave o splošnih in posamičnih ciljih STR, ki bi temeljile na prispevkih vseh njegovih pristojnih odborov, da bi Parlament lahko pravočasno predstavil svoje mnenje o napredku in prednostnih nalogah STR in da bi ga Evropski svet pri pregledu STR lahko v celoti upošteval; poleg tega meni, da so potrebni redni dialogi, tako splošni kot dvostranski, z nacionalnimi parlamenti držav članic in parlamenti ustavno priznanih regij, da se preuči najboljša praksa na področju trajnostnega razvoja in se izmenjajo izkušnje o izvajanju STR tako na nacionalni ravni kakor ravni Skupnosti;
Resolves to hold a regular plenary debate on the objectives and targets contained in the Sustainable Development Strategy, based on contributions from all of its relevant committees, so that Parliament can state its views on progress and priorities for the SDS in time for these to be taken fully into account in the European Council reviews of the SDS; considers, furthermore, that it should hold regular dialogue with the Member States' national parliaments and the parliaments of the constitutional regions, on a general or bilateral basis, in order to examine best practice on sustainable development, as well as to exchange experiences of both Europe-wide and national implementation of the SDS;
poudarja pomen, ki ga imajo nacionalne strategije trajnostnega razvoja v vsaki posamezni državi članici EU, in potrebo po medsebojni izmenjavi najboljše prakse; poleg tega opozarja, da je treba glede STR ukrepati na regionalni in lokalni ravni ter na ravni posameznih državljanov in pri tem okrepiti izobraževanje ter postopke sodelovanja in ozaveščanja javnosti o načelih trajnostnega razvoja;
Emphasises the importance of national sustainable development strategies within each of the EU Member States, and the need for the exchange of best practice between them; underlines, furthermore, the need for action on the SDS at regional and local level, as well as at the level of individual citizens, with reinforcement of education, participatory processes and public awareness of sustainable development principles;
meni, da bi morali biti pregledi trajnosti osrednji del vseh presoj vplivov novih političnih ukrepov EU in naknadnega nadzora nad izvajanjem politik;
Considers that reviews of sustainability should be a central feature of all impact assessments of new EU policy measures and of 'ex post' monitoring of policy implementation;
meni, da je treba ukrepe na ravni Skupnosti dopolniti z ukrepi na mednarodni ravni, da se omogoči spodbujanje načel trajnostnega razvoja po vsem svetu, ne nazadnje v hitro razvijajočih se državah, za spodbujanje gospodarskega razvoja in zmanjšanje revščine ob varčevanju z omejenimi viri in varovanjem svetovnega okolja;
Believes that action at EU level needs to be complemented by action at international level, with a view to encouraging the promotion of sustainable development principles around the world, not least in the rapidly developing countries, with a view to promoting economic growth and reducing poverty while saving scarce resources and protecting the global environment;
zato poziva k bolj sistematičnemu letnemu spremljanju napredka pri uresničevanju ciljev Johannesburškega akcijskega programa in Razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Calls, therefore, for more systematic annual monitoring of progress towards meeting the targets in the Johannesburg Action Plan and the Millennium Development Goals;
priznava, da državam v razvoju ni treba ponoviti napak onesnaževanja, ki so jih pri razvoju gospodarstev naredile države v razvoju; poleg tega poziva, da se v dejavnosti razvojnega sodelovanja EU vključijo načela o trajnostnem razvoju in da se za obravnavo svetovnih okoljskih izzivov in potreb zagotovi ustrezno financiranje;
Recognises that developing countries do not have to repeat polluting mistakes of the industrialised countries in the development of their economies; calls, in addition, for the mainstreaming of sustainability principles into the development cooperation activities of the EU and for proper funding to be ensured in order to address global environmental challenges and needs;
poudarja potrebo po dopolnilnih ukrepih, kot so trajnostni davčni ukrepi in ukrepi na področju javnih naročil, in kakor hitro je mogoče odpravo nevzdržnih državnih subvencij na številnih področjih, zlasti na področju energetike in kmetijstva; meni, da trajnosti ne bo mogoče doseči brez preložitve davčnega bremena z dela na uporabo virov in onesnaževanje;
Emphasises the need for complementary measures, such as sustainable fiscal measures and public procurement, and, as soon as possible, the elimination of unsustainable public subsidies in a number of policy areas, in particular in the fields of energy and agriculture; believes that sustainability will not be achieved without shifting the tax burden from labour to resource use and pollution;
izpostavlja pomen, ki ga imajo programi razvoja podeželja in kmetijstvo (tako konvencionalno kot biološko) za trajnostni razvoj, ker lahko le gospodarsko in ekološko vitalna podeželska območja ustavijo trend zmanjševanja števila prebivalstva na podeželju in tako varujejo bistvene infrastrukture; poziva k posebnim prizadevanjem za raziskave morebitnih vplivov podnebnih sprememb na razpoložljivost vode in kakovosti tal v sredozemskem območju;
Underlines the importance of rural development programmes and agriculture (both conventional and organic) for sustainable development, given that only economically and ecologically viable rural areas can reverse the trend of rural depopulation and thus safeguard essential infrastructures; calls for specific research efforts with regard to the possible effects of climate change on water availability and soil quality in the Mediterranean area;
poudarja pomembno vlogo znanosti in inovacij pri obravnavi številnih izzivov, določenih v STR, tudi konkurenčnosti; obžaluje, da je podpora javnega sektorja energetskim raziskavam v EU in njenih državah članicah nedavno močno upadla, in poziva, naj se znatno poveča glede podpore uporabi obnovljivih virov in doseganju energetske učinkovitosti;
Emphasises the important role of science and innovation in addressing the many challenges defined in the SDS, including competitiveness; regrets that public-sector support for energy research within the EU and its Member States has been drastically reduced recently and calls for a significant increase in support for renewables and energy efficiency;
ugotavlja, da se varstvo okolja in potreba po neodvisnosti od fosilnih goriv pojavljata kot ključni prednostni nalogi pri oblikovanju politike EU, pri čemer ne zadoščajo zgolj širše zastavljeni domači ukrepi za zmanjšanje učinka toplogrednih plinov, temveč je potrebna tudi znatna finančna pomoč za tehnološko sodelovanje z državami v razvoju, kar bi spodbudilo naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost in tehnologije z nizko vsebnostjo ogljika; poudarja pomen energetskih prihrankov kot edinega pomembnejšega vira energije v Evropi, ki nima škodljivih vplivov na okolje;
Recognises that climate security and the need to break dependency on fossil fuels are emerging as top priorities within EU policy-making, requiring not only ambitious domestic action to curb greenhouse gases but also significant financial support for technology cooperation with developing countries to encourage investments in energy efficiency and low-carbon technologies; emphasises the importance of energy saving, which is the single most important source of energy in Europe and one which has no negative environmental impacts;
meni, da se morajo cilji STR zrcaliti v porabi proračuna EU v obdobju 2007.- 2013 in služiti kot pomoč pri pripravi načrta za celovit pregled proračuna EU za obdobje 2008 - 2009; ob tem pozdravlja dejstvo, da predlog Uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ( KOM(2004)0492 ) izrecno navaja, da se cilji skladov skušajo doseči v okviru trajnostnega razvoja, vendar obžaluje, da dodeljevanje pomoči, ki se sofinancira iz skladov, ne ustreza Strategiji trajnostnega razvoja, in meni, da je treba ta vidik ponovno preučiti;
Believes that the SDS objectives must be reflected in the use of the EU budget over the period from 2007-2013 and help to set the agenda for the full review of the EU's budget in 2008/2009; welcomes, in this context, the fact that the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ( COM(2004)0492 ) explicitly states that the objectives of the Funds are pursued within the framework of sustainable development, but regrets that the earmarking of the assistance co-financed by the Funds does not correspond to the SDS and considers that this ought to be reviewed;
vztraja, da se ukrepov za podporo ciljem trajnostnega razvoja ne sme obravnavati zgolj v luči kratkoročnih stroškov, temveč tudi dolgoročnih koristi, ter da je treba v celoti upoštevati posledice neukrepanja;
Insists, finally, that measures to support sustainable development objectives should not be judged just in the light of their short-term costs, but also of their longer-term benefits, and that the costs of inaction should also be fully taken into account;
B6-0330 , 0331 , 0332 in 0333/2006
B6-0330 , 0331 , 0332 and 0333/2006
ob upoštevanju mednarodnih instrumentov na področju človekovih pravic, ki prepovedujejo diskriminacijo na podlagi rase in narodnosti, in zlasti Mednarodne konvencije o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije in Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki so ju podpisale vse države članice EU ter v velikem številu tudi tretje države,
having regard to international human rights instruments which prohibit discrimination based on racial and ethnic origin, and notably the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), both signed by all Member States and a large number of third states,
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6, 7 in 29 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člena 13 Pogodbe ES, ki EU in njene države članice zavezujejo k vzdrževanju človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zagotavljajo evropsko sredstvo v boju proti rasizmu, ksenofobiji in diskriminaciji,
having regard to Articles 2, 6, 7 and 29 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 13 of the EC Treaty, which commit the EU and its Member States to uphold human rights and fundamental freedoms and which provide European means to fight racism, xenophobia and discrimination,
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti člena 21 Listine,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially Article 21 thereof,
ob upoštevanju dejavnosti Evropske unije v boju proti rasizmu, ksenofobiji, antisemitizmu in homofobiji, zlasti direktiv o preprečevanju diskriminacije: direktiv 2000/43/ES o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost UL L 180, 19.7.2000, str.
having regard to European Union activities to fight racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and homophobia, in particular the anti-discrimination Directives 2000/43/EC implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p.
in 2000/78/ES o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu UL L 303, 2.12.2000, str.
and 2000/78/EC establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p.
, ter osnutka okvirnega sklepa o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji UL C 75 E, 26.3.2002, str.
, as well as to the proposal for a framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia OJ C 75 E, 26.3.2002, p.
ker so vzroki za rasizem, ksenofobijo, antisemitizem, homofobijo in anti-ciganstvo nerazumni in so včasih povezani s socialno marginalizacijo, izključenostjo in brezposelnostjo, kakor tudi z zavrnitvijo spodbujanja raznolikosti v naših družbah kot viru bogastva,
whereas racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, homophobia and anti-gypsyism are motivated by irrational reasons and are sometimes linked to social marginalisation, exclusion and unemployment, as well as by a refusal to conceive diversity in our societies as a source of richness,
ker so nekatere države članice doživele nasilne dogodke in/ali umore zaradi rasnega, ksenofobičnega in antisemitskega sovraštva, medtem ko znotraj in izven EU še vedno trajajo druge oblike neposrednega in posrednega rasizma, ksenofobije, antisemitizma in homofobije,
whereas several Member States have experienced violent events and/or killings motivated by racist, xenophobic and anti-Semitic hatred, while other direct and indirect forms of racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and homophobia persist inside and outside the EU,
ker so ruski organi prepovedali shod za enakost in strpnost do gejev, lezbijk, biseksualcev in transseksualcev, ki je bil predviden 27. maja 2006 v Moskvi, s kršenjem pravice do mirnega zbiranja in demonstracij, ki jo zagotavlja Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, v položaju, ko so pri blatenju sodelovali politični in verski organi ter spodbujali nasilne dogodke (do katerih je kasneje prišlo) in sodelovali pri njih,
whereas the Russian authorities have banned the march for equality and tolerance for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people planned for 27 May 2006 in Moscow in violation of the right of peaceful assembly and demonstration guaranteed by the ECHR, in a situation where political and religious authorities were involved in denigration and incited and participated in the violent events that subsequently occurred,
ker so nekatere politične stranke, vključno s strankami, ki so na oblasti v številnih državah in tistimi, ki so dobro zastopane na lokalni ravni, namenoma postavile vprašanja rasne, narodnostne, verske in gejevske nestrpnosti v središče svoje agende, in se s tem političnim voditeljem omogočile način izražanja, ki spodbuja rasno in druge oblike sovraštva in neti ekstremizem v družbi,
whereas some political parties, including those in power in a number of countries or well represented at local level, have deliberately placed issues of racial, ethnic, national, religious and gay intolerance at the heart of their agenda, allowing political leaders to use language that incites racial and other forms of hatred and stokes extremism in society,
ker je izobraževanje, zlasti na osnovni ravni, kritično področje "politike proti toku" v boju proti rasističnemu razpoloženju in predsodkom kasneje in ker bi morali oblikovalci politike v celoti upoštevati prednosti dobre socialne in narodnostne povezave v državnem osnovnošolskem izobraževanju,
whereas education, especially at primary level, is a critical 'upstream policy' area in fighting racist attitudes and prejudice in later life, and whereas policy makers ought to pay due regard to the benefit of a good social and ethnic mix in state primary education,
ker imajo mediji pomembno in bistveno vlogo v tem, kako javnost dojema rasno nasilje in ker so v nekaterih državah članicah mediji nagnjeni k enodimenzionalnemu in pristranskemu opisovanju nasilja in zato nosijo odgovornost za širjenje napačnih informacij o rasizmu in ksenofobiji,
whereas the media play an important and significant role in the public perception of racist violence and in some Member States tend to use one-dimensional and biased descriptions of violence, thus bearing responsibility for spreading misinformation on racism and xenophobia,
ker obstoj velikega števila spletnih strani, ki zagotavljajo glavni vir informacij o rasističnih skupinah, ki spodbujajo sovraštvo, povečuje zaskrbljenost, kako se odzvati na ta problem brez kršitve svobode izražanja,
whereas the existence of a large number of internet homepages which provide the main source of information about racist groups and groups which incite hatred raises concerns as to how to counteract this problem without violating freedom of expression,