natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij kot metaokvir za vse oblike izobraževanja pomemben tudi za trg dela; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je zaradi Lizbonske strategije večja pozornost namenjena vseživljenskemu učenju na delovnem mestu ter s tem tudi priznavanju kvalifikacij, pridobljenih na delovnem mestu; poudarja, da mora vsaka od osmih stopenj poudariti sposobnosti, ki se lahko dosežejo z različnimi učnimi potmi in ki upoštevajo tako sposobnost opravljanja poklica in izkušnje kot uporabnost slednjih pri poklicnem napredovanju; zato zahteva, da se deskriptorji spremenijo, pri čemer se upoštevajo in ohranjajo bolonjske smernice, ki so povezane z akademsko izobrazbo, ter se te še dopolnijo, in sicer tako, da bolj upoštevajo poklicne sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Takes the view that, as a meta-framework for all forms of learning, the EQF is also relevant to the labour market; welcomes the fact that, as a result of the Lisbon Strategy, greater attention is being devoted to lifelong learning in the workplace and hence to the recognition of qualifications acquired at work; stresses that each of the eight proposed reference levels should emphasise abilities that can be gained via various educational pathways and take account of professional abilities and experience as well as their potential value in terms of professional advancement; therefore calls for the descriptors to be changed, not only taking into account and maintaining the Bologna precepts linked to academic education, but complementing them by also taking greater account of vocational training and further training systems;
ponovno zahteva spremembo dosedanjih samodejnih opredelitev referenčnih ravni 6, 7 in 8 v tri akademske naslove, opredeljene v okviru kvalifikacij bolonjskega procesa (diplomant, magister in doktor), tako da se posameznikovo dejansko znanje, spretnosti ter osebno in strokovno usposobljenost razvrsti neodvisno od kraja, kjer so bili pridobljeni;
Urges a change to the present system of automatically matching reference levels six, seven and eight to the three academic levels of the Bologna qualifications framework (bachelor, master and doctor), so that the individual's actual knowledge, abilities and personal and occupational skills gained are classified irrespective of the place they were acquired;
poziva, da se izboljša tabela 2, s katero bi se moralo povečati razumevanje referenčnih ravni; meni, da bi se morala tabela jasno ravnati po pristopu čim večje učinkovitosti, ker daje prednost formalnemu izobraževanju; zato pozdravlja priporočilo, da je treba tabelo 2 obravnavati previdno; meni, da mora evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij kot splošni okvir takšna podrobna vprašanja, npr. glede oblikovanja tabele 2, prepustiti akterjem na lokalni oz. nacionalni ravni;
Calls for the improvement of Table 2, which is intended further to explain the reference levels; considers that it should be clearly subordinated to the outcome-oriented approach, as it focuses on formal education; welcomes, therefore, the recommended cautious approach to Table 2; takes the view that the EQF as a general meta-framework should leave such questions of detail such as the design of Table 2 to actors at local or national level;
zahteva, da se okrepijo in spodbujajo skupna evropska načela za zagotavljanje in potrjevanje neformalnih in priložnostnih procesov učenja o vseživljenjskem učenju, zlasti na področju razširjanja tehničnega in znanstvenega znanja in spretnosti ter ob upoštevanju posebnosti posameznih poklicnih panog, regij in držav članic; meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti metodam in sistemom za ocenjevanje učnih uspehov, ki so bili pridobljeni na neformalen ali priložnosten način, ker se usposobljenosti v okviru vseživljenjskega učenja razvijajo v številnih različnih vsakdanjih delovnih razmerah;
Calls for stronger support and promotion of common European principles on providing and validating non-formal and informal learning processes on lifelong learning particularly regarding the acquisition of technological and scientific knowledge and skills and taking account of the particularities of the various professional disciplines and of the different regions and countries; takes the view that it is essential to pay particular attention to methods and systems of evaluating learning outcomes achieved by non-formal or informal methods, as the development of skills in the context of lifelong learning takes place in a wide range of everyday work situations;
poudarja, da so bili z razvojem evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij uvedeni skupni referenčni kazalniki, ki delojemalcem, ki se nadalje izobražujejo, olajšajo izgradnjo poklicne kariere v okviru vseživljenjskega učenja;
Maintains that the development of an EQF will lead to the introduction of common reference indicators, facilitating career planning by those in training and employment in the context of lifelong learning;
zato se zavzema, da vsaka država v sodelovanju s pristojnimi organi in zavodi pripravi svoj nacionalni okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij in zagotovi njihovo združljivost z evropskim okvirom za priznavanje kvalifikacij; meni, da je smiselno uvesti evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij v državah, v katerih nacionalnega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij ni, in v tistih državah, ki zanemarjajo neformalne in priložnostne kvalifikacije;
Calls for every country to have its own national or regional qualifications frameworks, organised in cooperation with the responsible organisations and bodies as appropriate, ensuring compatibility with the EQF; takes the view that in countries which do not yet have a national qualifications framework and in which informal and non-formal qualifications are neglected, it makes sense for the EQF to be introduced;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi proces usklajevanja rabljenih pojmov in izrazov;
Calls on the Commission to launch the process of harmonising conceptual approaches and terms;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni povezavo med okvirom za priznavanje kvalifikacij iz bolonjskega procesa in evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij ter navede, ali so predlagani kazalniki iz evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij edina referenčna točka za skupni evropski prostor vseživljenjskega učenja;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the relationship between the framework of qualifications envisaged under the Bologna process and the EQF, and to specify whether the indicators proposed under the EQF will constitute the sole point of reference for a common European area of lifelong learning;
zavrača določanje preskriptivnih meril za poti učenja ali trajanje in lokacije programov izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Rejects the setting of prescriptive criteria for learning pathways or for the duration and location of education and training courses;
meni, da je treba spodbuditi nastanek več instrumentov za podporo evropskemu okviru za priznavanje kvalifikacij, da se državljanom omogoči dostop do slednjega in, da je treba hkrati postaviti v ospredje sklepe iz Kopenhagna in Bologne, na podlagi katerih se oblikuje skladen pristop; meni, da je treba veliko pozornost nameniti delu, ki so ga mednarodne organizacije in evropski centri, kot sta Organizacija za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter Evropski center za razvoj poklicnega usposabljanja, opravile na področju izobraževanja in pridobivanja kvalifikacij in spretnosti; poziva Komisijo, da pospeši razvoj sistema Evropski prenosni kreditni sitem v poklicnem in strokovnem izobraževanju (ECVET), še naprej razvija in spodbuja instrument Europass ter razširi zbirko podatkov "Ploteus" ter še naprej podpira inovativne pristope k priznavanju neformalnega in priložnostnega učenja;
Takes the view that further instruments to support the EQF should be fostered in order to facilitate public access to the EQF, with the main focus on the Copenhagen and Bologna conclusions, to which the EQF should form a logically structured starting point; takes the view that special attention should also be given to the contribution of international organisations and European centres such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training in the field of learning and the acquisition of qualifications and skills; calls on the Commission to progress the development of the European Credit of Vocational Education and Training (ECVET) system to further develop and promote the Europass and to develop the "Ploteus" data bank and to promote further innovative approaches to the recognition of informal and non-formal learning;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj okrepijo vlogo in strukturo nacionalnih centrov Europass (NEC) ter jim olajšajo opravljanje njihovih temeljnih nalog in izpolnjevanje ciljev, ki jih je zastavila Evropska unija, pri čemer si je treba posebej prizadevati za razširjanje uporabe instrumentov, za katere neposredno skrbijo NEC (evropski življenjepis in Europass mobilnost), in postopno sprejetje sistema Europass;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance the role and structure of the National Europass Centre (NEC) and to make it easier for the NEC to fulfil its core tasks and to achieve the objectives laid down by the European Union, with particular reference to the wider dissemination of the instruments directly managed by the NEC (European Curriculum Vitae, Mobility Europass) and the progressive adoption of the Europass system;
poudarja, da je za izvajanje evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij na prostovoljni podlagi potrebna podpora in zavezanost zainteresiranih strani na nacionalni in sektorski ravni;
Underlines that the implementation of EQF on a voluntary basis requires the support and commitment of national and sectoral stakeholders;
priznava, da zahteva evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij, kot orodje za približevanje med posameznimi sistemi kvalifikacij, usklajenost in medsebojno zaupanje; priporoča, da se za mehanizme zagotavljanja kakovosti pripravijo načela preglednosti in zanesljivosti, zato da se zagotovi možnost primerjave in s tem medsebojnega priznavanja kvalifikacij državljanov EU;
Recognises that EQF, as a translation tool among different qualification systems, requires consistency and mutual trust; recommends that principles of transparent and trustworthy quality assurance mechanisms be drawn up so that comparisons may be made allowing for the mutual recognition of the qualifications of EU citizens;
poudarja, da lahko evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij najbolj prispeva k mobilnosti na evropskem trgu dela, če odločitev ene države članice o priznavanju posameznih nacionalnih kvalifikacij na ustrezne ravni evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij, sprejmejo tudi druge; meni, da so obveznosti držav članic, ki jih je v okviru zagotavljanja kakovosti predlagala Komisija, do upoštevanja več skupnih načel pomemben element uspešnega sodelovanja udeležencev na različnih ravneh; vendar opozarja, da bo tako le, če ne bo prišlo do prekrivanja z obstoječimi sistemi zagotavljanja kakovosti, npr. s standardi in smernicami za zagotavljanje kakovosti;
Emphasises that the EQF can make a significant contribution to the mobility of the European labour market if the decision of a Member State to match individual national qualifications to a particular EQF level is accepted by others; takes the view that, in the context of quality assurance, the Commission's proposal to oblige Member States to observe a number of common principles is an important element in the successful cooperation between stakeholders at various levels; notes, however, that this will only be the case if it does not duplicate existing quality assurances systems, such as the Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance;
meni, da mora biti medsebojno zaupanje rezultat okrepljenega sodelovanja med državami članicami v evropskem okviru za priznavanje kvalifikacij in temeljni pogoj za učinkovito delovanje evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij, saj so primerno poskusno obdobje, presoja vplivov ter ocenjevanje nujno potrebni za nenehno izboljševanje in prilagajanje evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij; poziva Komisijo, da v ta namen razvije in predlaga skupne metode in strategije;
Takes the view that mutual trust should be a result of increased cooperation between the Member States in the context of the EQF and also a precondition for the efficient functioning of the EQF an appropriate trial period, an impact assessment and a supporting evaluation are essential for the continual improvement and adaptation of the EQF; calls on the Commission to develop and propose appropriate methods and strategies to make this possible;
poudarja nadaljnji razvoj evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij, ki bo zrcalil zahteve zainteresiranih strani za pojasnitev, ki so jih izrazile v postopku posvetovanja;
Urges that EQF is further developed reflecting stakeholders' requests for clarification presented in the consultations process;
poziva Komisijo, naj svoj predlog spremeni na podlagi ugotovitev Parlamenta;
Calls on the Commission to revise its proposal on the basis of Parliament's observations;
poudarja pomen široke in dobro strukturirane strategije komunikacije in razširjanja za večjo ozaveščenost o koristih evropskega okvira za priznavanje kvalifikacij in zanimanje zanje;
Points to the importance of a wide and well-structured communication and dissemination strategy to raise awareness and interest in EQF's benefits;
meni, da je treba za uspešen evropski okvir za priznavanje kvalifikacij nujno natančno opredeliti koristi za končne uporabnike, tj. za državljane, delojemalce, delodajalce in izobraževalne zavode;
Takes the view that it is essential for the success of the EQF to provide something of practical use for end users, thus for citizens, employees and employers as well as for educational institutions;
poziva Komisijo, naj obvesti Evropski parlament o izidu nacionalnih posvetovanj ter pred pripravo končnega predloga nadaljuje z izmenjavo mnenj;
Calls on the Commission to brief Parliament on the outcome of the national consultations and to hold further exchanges of views before drawing up its final proposal;
naroči predsedniku, naj to resolucijo predloži Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
ker je bilo v severozahodnem Atlantiku v zadnjih štirih letih pobitih več kot milijon in pol mladičev grenlandskih tjulenjev in je bila velika večina teh živali stara manj kot tri mesece,
whereas more than one and a half million harp seal pups have been slaughtered in the North West Atlantic over the last four years and the vast majority of these animals were less than three months old,
ker se je v 50-ih in 60-ih letih 20. stoletja, ko je poboj tjulenjev zadnjič dosegel isti letni obseg, populacija tjulenjev zmanjšala za dve tretjini,
whereas the last time the annual number of seals now being killed was slaughtered in the 1950s and 1960s the seal population was reduced by two thirds,
ker v povprečju lovci na tjulenje iz lova na tjulenje prejmejo manj kot 5 % svojih prihodkov, kar predstavlja le nekaj delovnih dni letno,
whereas, on average, sealers receive less than 5% of their income from sealing, which provides only a few days' work each year,
ker je mednarodna ekipa veterinarjev ugotovila, da je bilo 42 % izmed pregledanih pobitih tjulenjev morda odrtih medtem, ko so bili še pri zavesti,
whereas a team of international veterinarians concluded that 42% of the slaughtered seals they examined may have been skinned whilst still conscious,
ker je bil uvoz krzna in izdelkov iz krzna grenlandskega tjulenja in kapičastega tjulenja v Skupnost prepovedan leta 1983 v skladu z Direktivo 83/129/EGS UL L 91, 9.4.1983, str.
whereas the import of whitecoat harp seal and blueback hooded seal furs and furskin products was banned within the Community in 1983 pursuant to Directive 83/129/EEC OJ L 91, 9.4.1983, p.
; ker lovci na tjulenje zdaj počakajo nekaj dni, da se mladiči grenlandskega tjulenja levijo, in ker se izdelke iz teh živali še vedno uvaža v Evropsko unijo,
; whereas sealers now wait a few days until harp seal pups have moulted and whereas the products of these animals are still imported into the European Union,
ker so nekatere države EU (Belgija, Luksemburg in Italija) že sprejele ukrepe za prepoved trgovine s proizvodi iz tjulenjev, medtem ko druge to še načrtujejo (Združeno kraljestvo in Nizozemska),
whereas a number of EU countries (Belgium, Luxembourg and Italy) have already taken steps to ban the trade in seal products, and others (the UK and the Netherlands) are considering action,
ker so ZDA, Mehika in Hrvaška prepovedale trgovino s proizvodi iz tjulenjev,
whereas the USA, Mexico and Croatia have banned the trade in seal products,
ker Svet Evrope trenutno preučuje pobudo za prepoved uvoza in uporabe tjulenjev oziroma njihovih delov,
whereas the Council of Europe is currently considering a motion that calls for a ban on the import and use of seals and seal parts,
zahteva, da Komisija takoj pripravi osnutek uredbe o prepovedi uvoza, izvoza in prodaje vseh proizvodov iz grenlandskega ali kapičastega tjulenja;
Requests the Commission to immediately draft a regulation to ban the import, export and sale of all harp and hooded seal products;
meni, da ta uredba ne bo vplivala na tradicionalni lov na tjulenje Inuitov, ki predstavlja zgolj 3 % delež zdajšnjega ulova;
Considers that this regulation should not have an impact on traditional Inuit seal hunting which, however, only accounts for 3% of the current hunt;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories, to the Council and the Commission.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ( KOM(2005)0475 – C6-0436/2005 – 2005/0202(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council framework decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters ( COM(2005)0475 – C6-0436/2005 – 2005/0202(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0475 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0475 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, na podlagi katerega se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0436/2005 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0436/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0192/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0192/2006 ),
poziva Svet, da obvesti Parlament, ali namerava odstopati od besedila, ki ga je odobril Parlament;
Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;
poziva Svet, da se ponovno posvetuje s Parlamentom, ali namerava bistveno spremeniti predlog Komisije;
Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o spremembah in podaljšanju Sklepa 2001/923/ES o vzpostavitvi programa izmenjave, pomoči in usposabljanja za zaščito eura pred ponarejanjem (program "Pericles") ( KOM(2006)0243 – C6-0179/2006 – 2006/0078(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the 'Pericles' programme) ( COM(2006)0243 – C6-0179/2006 – 2006/0078(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0243 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0243 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju tretjega stavka člena 123(4) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0179/2006 ),
having regard to Article 123(4), third sentence of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0179/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0276/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0276/2006 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o razširitvi na ne-sodelujoče države članice uporabe Sklepa 2006/…/ES o spremembah in podaljšanju Sklepa 2001/923/ES o vzpostavitvi programa izmenjave, pomoči in usposabljanja za zaščito eura pred ponarejanjem (program "Pericles") ( KOM(2006)0243 – C6-0180/2006 – 2006/0079(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision extending to the non-participating Member States the application of Decision 2006/…/EC amending and extending Decision 2001/923/EC establishing an exchange, assistance and training programme for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (the "Pericles" programme) ( COM(2006)0243 – C6-0180/2006 – 2006/0079(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0180/2006 ),
having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0180/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0277/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0277/2006 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o upoštevanju obsodb med državami članicami Evropske unije v novem kazenskem postopku ( KOM(2005)0091 – C6-0235/2005 – 2005/0018(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings ( COM(2005)0091 – C6-0235/2005 – 2005/0018(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2005)0091 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2005)0091 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 34(2)(b) Pogodbe o EU,
having regard to Article 34(2)(b) of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0235/2005 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0235/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0268/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0268/2006 ),
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Uvodna izjava 6
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 6
Morebitni vpis obsodbe, izrečene v drugi državi članici, v kazensko evidenco države članice v zvezi z državljani ali osebami, ki prebivajo v njej, mora upoštevati enaka pravila, kakor če bi šlo za obsodbo na nacionalni ravni, in ne sme biti vzrok za to, da so osebe, ki so bile obsojene v drugih državah članicah, obravnavane slabše kakor tiste, obsojene v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo.
The entry in the criminal record of a Member State of convictions against nationals or residents handed down in another Member State must be governed by the same rules as if it had been handed down by a national court and may not cause persons convicted in other Member States to be treated more unfavourably than those who have been convicted by national courts.
mora nadomestiti
decision is to replace
Sprememba 3 Člen 1, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 3 Article 1, paragraph 1 1.
Cilj tega okvirnega sklepa je določiti pogoje, na podlagi katerih država članica v
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to determine the conditions in which a Member State takes into account, in the course of