natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da preizkušanje transakcij na podlagi vzorca kaže najverjetnejšo stopnjo napake med 2 in 5 %; poziva Komisijo, da podvoji prizadevanja za znižanje te stopnje pod 2 %;
Notes that sampling checks on transactions reveal a margin of error most probably between 2 % and 5 %: calls on the Commission to intensify its efforts to bring this figure down to below 2 %;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče ocenilo, da so letni računovodski izkazi Izvajalske agencije za vseevropska prometna omrežja z vseh pomembnih vidikov zakoniti in pravilni; je zaskrbljen zaradi zamud pri zaposlovanju in pozdravlja cilj agencije, da zapolni trenutno prosta delovna mesta;
Notes with satisfaction that the Court of Auditors has taken the view that the annual accounts of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency are legal and regular in all significant aspects; is concerned about the delays in recruitment and welcomes the Agency's objective of filling posts that are currently vacant;
obžaluje pomanjkanje podatkov o ukrepih na področju turizma ter pozdravlja novo pravno in gospodarsko podlago, ki jo omogoča Lizbonska pogodba in ki ponuja možnosti za razvoj ukrepov v tem sektorju na ravni Evropske unije (socialni in kulturni turizem, destinacije odličnosti itd.), financiranih iz večletnega proračunskega okvira;
Regrets the lack of data on actions in the field of tourism and welcomes the new legal and economic framework provided by the Lisbon Treaty, which allows the development of actions at the European Union level (social and cultural tourism, destinations of excellence, etc.) in this sector supported in a multiannual budgetary framework;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za večjo preglednost in prijaznost do uporabnikov ter podpira nadaljnje korake v to smer; zahteva, da se ob vmesnem pregledu večletnih programov opravi poglobljena ocena izvajalskih in upravljavskih struktur; priporoča vključitev elementov za merjenje zadovoljstva strank v zvezi z nacionalnimi agencijami; v zvezi s tem znova opozarja, da skoraj 70 % sredstev za večletne programe uporabijo nacionalne agencije;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts to achieve greater transparency and customer-friendliness, and supports further steps in that direction; requests, for the upcoming mid-term reviews of the multiannual programmes, that an in-depth assessment be carried out of implementation and management structures; recommends the inclusion of elements to measure client satisfaction in relation to national agencies; recalls in this context that almost 70 % of the funds of the multiannual programmes are implemented through national agencies;
podpira smernice, ki jih je Komisija pripravila za nacionalne organe v zvezi z nadzorom nad delom omenjenih agencij, da bi dodatno olajšala izvajanje programov v državah članicah; spodbuja Komisijo, naj nacionalne agencije še naprej dejavno spremlja pri vodenju programov, da se bo mogoče izogniti motnjam pri izvajanju delov večletnih programov; podpira stroge ukrepe Komisije, ki v primerih, ko so ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti pri upravljanju, začasno zadrži izplačila nacionalnim agencijam; poziva vse vpletene strani, naj se skušajo izogniti negativnim posledicam takšnih napak za upravičence; poziva Komisijo, naj v interesu preglednosti in nadzora stroškov organizacijske in kadrovske stroške nacionalnih agencij loči od sredstev, ki se izplačajo kot subvencije;
Supports the guidance provided by the Commission to national authorities as regards the supervision of the work of national agencies with a view to further facilitating programme management in Member States; encourages the Commission to continue the active monitoring of programme management by national agencies, in order to avoid interruptions in the implementation of parts of the multiannual programmes; supports the strict line taken by the Commission of suspending payments to national agencies in cases where management weaknesses are detected; calls on all parties involved to avoid the negative consequences for beneficiaries caused by such failures; calls on the Commission, in the interests of transparency and cost control, to separate the organisational and staff costs of national agencies from funds to be paid in grants;
opozarja na nevarnosti nadzornih ukrepov, ki so nesorazmerni s proračunom, ki se izvršuje; meni, da zadevne zahteve za nadzor ne smejo v nobenem primeru privesti do pritiskov za povečanje obsega, zaradi katerih bi se zvišal prag za udeležence;
Draws attention to the dangers of control measures which are disproportionate to the budgets administered; considers that the relevant control requirements must not under any circumstances result in pressure to make increases in scale which will raise the threshold for participants;
ker se pripravlja revizija finančne uredbe, Komisijo poziva, naj si prizadeva za novo ureditev, po kateri bodo upravičenci lahko pridobili več sredstev brez strahu, da se bo zaradi tega zmanjšala podpora, ki jo prejemajo v obliki sofinanciranja EU;
Calls on the Commission, in the light of the revision of the Financial Regulation, to work towards a new arrangement under which beneficiaries can be allowed to acquire more assets without having to fear that this will result in a reduction in the support allocated to them on the basis of EU cofinancing;
poziva Komisijo in nacionalne agencije, naj poiščejo razumno in prilagodljivo rešitev za obresti za neporabljena decentralizirana proračunska sredstva, za katere je odtegnjen davek pri viru v državah članicah, nacionalne agencije pa jih morajo poravnati v celoti;
Calls on the Commission, together with the national agencies, to seek a reasonable and flexible solution to the problem of interest on unspent decentralised budgets, on which withholding tax is paid in the Member States but which national agencies must repay in full;
ugotavlja, da se je število napak pri izplačilih občutno zmanjšalo; vseeno meni, da so potrebne dodatne izboljšave pri vmesnih in končnih izplačilih; poziva Komisijo, naj pozorneje nadzira postopek naknadne letne izjave v zvezi s programom vseživljenjskega učenja, in sicer z obiski, namenjenimi spremljanju, in neposrednim preverjanjem;
Notes the significant reduction of errors related to payments; considers, however, that further improvements are needed for interim and final payments; calls on the Commission to supervise more closely the annual ex-post declaration process in respect of the Lifelong Learning Programme, by means of monitoring visits and direct verification;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda birokratske ovire za omenjeni program mobilne mladine; poziva k temu, da bi bila zlasti ukrepa 1.1 in 1.3 programa na voljo kot storitvi nizkega praga; poudarja, da morajo biti izbirna merila pregledna in razumljiva prosilcem; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o uvedbi novega načina dodeljevanja sredstev v programu za mobilno mladino, da bo denar na voljo tudi majhnim projektom in mladinskim projektom, ki trenutno ne morejo zbrati lastnih sredstev;
Calls on the Commission to review the bureaucratic obstacles impeding the ‘Youth in Action’ Programme; calls especially for the measures under Actions 1.1 and 1.3 of the Programme to be made available as low-threshold services; emphasises that selection criteria must be transparent and comprehensible for applicants; calls on the Commission to consider the introduction of a new mode of allocation of funding under the ‘Youth in Action’ Programme so as to make funding available to small-scale and youth projects which are unable in the current situation to raise their own finance;
ugotavlja relativen upad stopnje izvrševanja proračunskih obveznosti za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v letu 2008 v primerjavi z letom 2007 (87,51 % leta 2008 v primerjavi z 90,29 % leta 2007); je seznanjen s tem, da je bilo 75.000.000 EUR prenesenih v leto 2009, vendar po informacijah, ki so jih posredovale službe Komisije, ugotavlja, da so bile obveznosti za ta znesek sprejete pred 31. marcem 2009; poudarja, da se je stopnja izvrševanja plačil v primerjavi z letom 2007 povečala (80,88 % v letu 2008 v primerjavi s 60,41 % leta 2007); poziva generalni direktorat za svobodo, varnost in pravosodje, naj poskusi povečevati stopnjo izvrševanja obveznosti in plačil v letu 2009;
Notes a relative decrease in the level of implementation of commitments of the budget for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in 2008 compared to 2007 (87.51 % in 2008 compared to 90.29 % in 2007); notes that EUR 75 000 000 have been carried over in 2009, but observes that, according to the information received from the Commission services, that amount was committed before 31 March 2009; points out that the implementation level of payments has increased as compared with 2007 (80.88 % in 2008 against 60.41 % in 2007); calls on the Directorate-General for Freedom, Security and Justice to try to continue maximising the level of implementation of commitments and payments in 2009;
obžaluje, da Komisija prvih plačil za predhodno financiranje držav članic v okviru sklada za zunanje meje ni mogla izplačati vse do zadnjih mesecev leta 2008, ker so bila pravila za izvajanje sprejeta šele 5. marca 2008 in ker so nekatere države članice predložile prvotno različico opisa sistemov upravljanja in kontrole ter programske dokumente z znatno zamudo oziroma z nezadostno kakovostjo;
Regrets that, within the framework of the External Borders Fund, the first pre-financing payments to Member States could not be made by the Commission until the final months of 2008, as the implementing rules were only adopted on 5 March 2008 and some Member States submitted the initial versions of Descriptions of Management and Control Systems as well as of the programming documents with substantial delays or insufficient quality;
ugotavlja, da bi morala v prihodnjih letih razrešnica za izvrševanje proračuna agencije temeljiti tudi na oceni dela agencije med letom, ki jo opravi ustrezni odbor;
Notes that in the coming years the discharge for the implementation of the budget for the agencies should be further based on the relevant committee's assessment of the Agency's performance throughout the year;
Schengenski informacijski sistem druge generacije
Second-generation Schengen Information System
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi zamud pri vzpostavljanju Schengenskega informacijskega sistema druge generacije in zaradi posledic teh zamud za proračun EU in za proračune držav članic; ugotavlja, da tako imenovani „prvi osnovni test“, ki se nanaša na stabilnost, zanesljivost in učinek projekta SIS II, ki je bil izveden konec januarja 2010, ni bil uspešen;
Is very concerned about the delays in setting up the second-generation Schengen Information System and the implications of these delays for the EU budget and the Member States‘ budgets; notes that the so-called ’milestone 1 test‘ concerning the stability, reliability and performance of the SIS II project, carried out at the end of January 2010, was not successful;
ponovno opozarja na obveznost Komisije po Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 1104/2008 z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS I+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) UL L 299, 8.11.2008, str.
Recalls the Commission's obligation under Council Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008 of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS I+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) OJ L 299, 8.11.2008, p.
in Sklepu Sveta 2008/839/PNZ z dne 24. oktobra 2008 o migraciji s schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS I+) na drugo generacijo schengenskega informacijskega sistema (SIS II) UL L 299, 8.11.2008, str.
and Council Decision 2008/839/JHA of 24 October 2008 on migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS I+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) OJ L 299, 8.11.2008, p.
, da predloži poročilo o napredku v zvezi z razvojem SIS II in migracijo s SIS I + na SIS II Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu vsakih šest mesecev in prvič po šestih mesecih v letu 2009; ugotavlja, da je prvo poročilo o napredku, ki zajema obdobje od januarja 2009 do junija 2009 ( KOM(2009)0555 ) in je bilo objavljeno 22. oktobra 2009, zastarelo in da drugo poročilo o napredku še ni na voljo;
to submit a progress report concerning the development of SIS II and the migration from SIS I + to SIS II to Parliament and to the Council every six months and for the first time after the first six months of 2009; notes that the first progress report, covering the period from January 2009 to June 2009 ( COM(2009)0555 ) and published on 22 October 2009, is outdated and that the second progress report is not yet available;
ponovno poudarja zahtevo Sveta in Parlamenta Komisiji, ki sta jo podala Svet v svojih sklepih o nadaljnji usmeritvi SIS II z dne 4. in 5. junija 2009 in Parlament v resoluciji z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o napredku schengenskega informacijskega sistema II in vizumskega informacijskega sistema Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0055 .
Reiterates the Council's and Parliament's request to the Commission – made by the Council in its conclusions on the further direction of SIS II of 4/5 June 2009 and by Parliament in its resolution of 22 October 2009 on progress of Schengen Information System II and Visa Information System Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0055 .
, in sicer da je treba zagotoviti popolno preglednost glede finančnih vidikov razvoja druge generacije SIS;
– that it ensure full transparency as regards the financial aspects of the development of the second-generation SIS;
poudarja, da bi morala Komisija izpolnjevati svoje obveznosti poročanja na bolj pravočasen in preglednejši način;
Stresses that the Commission should comply with its reporting obligations in a more timely and transparent manner;
vabi Evropsko računsko sodišče, naj izvede podrobno revizijo in predloži posebno poročilo, v katerem bo ocenjeno, kako Komisija upravlja projekt SIS, od začetka projekta z začetnim javnim razpisom;
Invites the Court of Auditors to carry out an in-depth audit and to present a special report evaluating the management of the SIS II project by the Commission, from the beginning of the project starting with the initial call for tenders;
si pridržuje pravico, da zadrži v rezervi sredstva, ki naj bi bila dodeljena za razvoj SIS II v letnem proračunu za leto 2011, da bi zagotovil popoln parlamentarni nadzor in pregled nad postopkom;
Reserves the right to hold in reserve the funds to be allocated for the development of SIS II in the 2011 annual budget, in order to ensure full parliamentary scrutiny and oversight of the process;
opozarja Komisijo, da je v okviru člena 8 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije spodbujanje enakosti med moškimi in ženskami temeljno načelo Evropske unije in bi ga morali spoštovati pri vseh dejavnostih Evropske unije, zato mora biti prisotno tudi v razrešnici glede proračuna Evropske unije;
Reminds the Commission that under Article 8 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union the promotion of equality between men and women is a fundamental principle of the European Union and should be respected in all European Union activities, and therefore should also be traceable in the European Union budget discharge;
izraža obžalovanje, da se načelo enakosti spolov pri pripravi proračuna ne izvaja; zato ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme dodatne ukrepe za to, da se pri načrtovanju proračuna resnično upošteva vprašanje enakosti spolov;
Regrets that gender budgeting has still not been implemented; therefore reiterates its demand to the Commission to take further steps towards ensuring that gender mainstreaming becomes a reality in budgetary planning;
pozdravlja študijo izvedljivosti Študija za oceno izvedljivosti in možnosti za uvedbo načela enakosti spolov v postopek priprave proračuna EU, Evropska komisija (posebna pogodba GD za proračun ABAC 132007, na podlagi okvirne pogodbe BUDG 06/PO/01/Lot 002/ABAC-101922, končno poročilo, maj 2008 A).
Welcomes the feasibility study Study to assess the feasibility and options for the introduction of elements of gender budgeting into the EU budgetary process European Commission (DG Budget Specific contract ABAC 132007, Under the Framework Contract BUDG 06/PO/01/Lot 002/ABAC-101922 Final Report May 2008 A).
glede priprave proračuna ob upoštevanju načela enakosti spolov, ki jo pripravlja Komisija, in poziva vse partnerje proračunskega postopka Evropske unije, naj študijo upoštevajo pri pripravi, izvrševanju ali reviziji proračuna;
prepared by the Commission on gender budgeting, and calls on all partners in the European Union budgetary process to take the study into consideration when preparing, implementing or auditing the budget;
poziva Komisijo k dodatnemu prizadevanju za pripravo podatkov, ki zadevajo enakost spolov in ki se jih lahko vključi v poročila o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna, saj zelo omejen obseg podatkov, ki so zdaj na voljo, ne omogoča ustreznega vpogleda v trenutno stanje;
Calls on the Commission to make further efforts to develop gender-specific data that can be included in the budget discharge reports, since the very limited data available so far do not give an appropriate overview of the situation;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj vidikom enakosti spolov nameni poseben del svojega poročila o razrešnici;
Invites the Court of Auditors to dedicate a separate part within its discharge reports to gender equality aspects;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bili finančni mehanizmi za obdobje 2007–2013 poenostavljeni, vendar izraža obžalovanje, da so bile kljub temu napredku v letu 2008 znova storjene napake pri številnih nadomestilih za kohezijske projekte (to je področje Evropskega socialnega sklada in enakosti spolov); zato poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi večjo učinkovitost finančnih mehanizmov;
Welcomes the fact that financing mechanisms for 2007-2013 have been simplified, but regrets that, in spite of this improvement, in 2008 a large number of reimbursements to the Cohesion projects, (to which the European Social Fund and gender equality belong), were again affected by errors; therefore asks the Commission to ensure that financing mechanisms are more effective;
iz izkušenj iz let 2007 in 2008 ve, da je nujno potrebno zagotoviti, da se preglednost na tem področju politike neprestano izboljšuje, v povezavi z odhodki, zlasti glede na ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunajpolitično delovanje (EEAS);
Notes from experience in 2007 and in 2008 that it is essential to ensure that transparency in this policy area continues to improve in terms of expenditure, particularly in view of the setting-up of the European External Action Service (EEAS);
poziva Komisijo, naj še pred koncem postopka razrešnice za leto 2008 predloži natančne, podrobne in celovite načrte za osebje ter organizacijsko in nadzorno strukturo EEAS, iz katerega bo razvidno zlasti povečanje števila osebja in dodelitev osebja, predvidene posledice za proračun in spremembe Statuta in Finančne uredbe, in naj se začne na temelju predloženih predlogov takoj pogajati s proračunskim organom; zavrača pogajanja na podlagi nejasnih okvirnih sporazumov;
Calls on Commission to submit, before the end of the 2008 discharge procedure, concrete, detailed and all-encompassing plans for the staffing, organisational and control structure of the EEAS, showing in particular the increase in and allocation of staff, the envisaged budgetary implications and changes to the Statute and the Financial Regulation, and to enter immediately into negotiations with the budgetary authority on the basis of the proposals submitted; rejects negotiations based on vague framework agreements;
močno zagovarja stališče, da se pravica do nadzora Parlamenta kot organa, pristojnega za podeljevanje razrešnice, zaradi ustanovitve EEAS nikakor ne sme zmanjšati; pričakuje, da bo Komisija to upoštevala Glej Resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 22. oktobra 2009 o institucionalnih vidikih ustanovitve evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0057 ).
Is strongly of the view that Parliament's right of scrutiny as discharge authority should in no way diminish with the setting-up of the EEAS; expects the Commission to bear this See Parliament's resolution of 22 October 2009 on the institutional aspects of setting up the European External Action Service (Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0057 ).
, ko bo predlagala revizijo veljavne Finančne uredbe; poudarja, da mora biti ta revizija del običajne triletne revizije; zavrača idejo pospešenega postopka, ki ga predlaga Komisija;
in mind when proposing the review of the current Financial Regulation; stresses that this latter revision should be part of the normal triennial revision; rejects the idea of a fast-track procedure as envisaged by the Commission;
z veliko zaskrbljenostjo opaža, da je splošna ocena Računskega sodišča, da so nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi vseh zadevnih generalnih direktoratov (AIDCO, RELEX, ELARG in ECHO) še vedno samo delno učinkoviti, ter da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da na plačila v tej skupini politike vplivajo resne napake; poudarja, tako kot prej, da se napake pojavljajo zlasti pri dodeljevanju in pri upravičencih;
Notes with great concern that the Court's overall assessment that the supervisory and control systems of all DGs concerned (AIDCO, RELEX, ELARG and ECHO) are still only partially effective, as well as the Court's conclusion that payments in this policy group were affected by material error; points out that, as previously, errors are to be found mainly at delegation and beneficiary level;
pozdravlja izboljšave nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov GD AIDCO; vendar poziva urad EuropeAid, naj ustrezno izboljša svoje predhodne preglede, omogoči zunanje revizije ter odpravi nedoslednosti in pomanjkljivosti v svojem letnem revizijskem poročilu, v revizijskem modulu CRIS in celotnem spremljanju revizijskih rezultatov;
Welcomes DG AIDCO's improvements in its supervisory and control systems; however, encourages EuropeAid to make the necessary improvements to its ex-ante checks, to have recourse to external audits and to remedy the inconsistencies and shortcomings in its Annual Audit Plan, in the CRIS audit module and in the overall monitoring of audit results;
poziva GD RELEX, naj okrepi svoje predhodne preglede in odpravi pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je odkrilo Računsko sodišče v povezavi s finančnim poslovodenjem in nadzorom projektov; pozdravlja, da je GD RELEX spoznal, da mora temu problemu posvetiti večjo pozornost;
Urges DG RELEX to strengthen its ex-post controls and to remedy the weaknesses revealed by the Court in respect of its financial management and supervision of projects; welcomes the recognition by DG RELEX of the need to pay more attention to this problem;
opozarja na veliko morebitnih primerov goljufij (102 primera), ki jih v tej skupini politike raziskuje urad OLAF – druga najvišja številka, takoj za notranjimi preiskavami; pozdravlja usmerjenost urada OLAF na zunanjo pomoč, ko gre za preiskovalne in preventivne dejavnosti ter okrepljeno sodelovanje;
Draws attention to the substantial number of possible fraud cases (102 cases) under investigation by OLAF in this policy group – the second highest number, just behind internal investigations; welcomes the focus by OLAF on External Aid, in investigative and preventive work and intensified cooperation activities;