natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Popravek napovedi osnov za tradicionalna lastna sredstva, DDV in BND ter upoštevanje popravkov za Združeno kraljestvo v proračunih za leto 2006, 2007 in 2010.
A revision of the forecast of Traditional Own Resources, VAT and GNI bases, the budgeting of the corrections of UK rebate for the years 2006, 2007 and 2010 .
o četrtem forumu na visoki ravni o učinkovitosti pomoči
on the 4th High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness
Poročevalec: Cristian Dan Preda
Rapporteur: Cristian Dan Preda
Evropski parlament je,
The European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije tisočletja Združenih narodov z dne 8. septembra 2000;
– having regard to the United Nations Millennium Declaration of 8 September 2000,
– ob upoštevanju evropskega soglasja o razvoju iz leta 2005
– having regard to the 2005 European Consensus on Development
Sklepi Sveta št. 9558/07 z dne 15. maja 2007. ;
Council Conclusions 9558/07, 15.5.2007. ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 28. septembra 2006 o okrepitvi in izboljšanju sodelovanja: paket o učinkoviti pomoči za leto 2006
– having regard to its resolution of 28 September 2006 on ‘more and better cooperation: the 2006 EU aid effectiveness package’
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose z dne 17. novembra 2009 o operativnem okviru za učinkovitost pomoči
– having regard to the Conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 17 November 2009 on an Operational Framework on Aid Effectiveness
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zunanje zadeve (ministri za razvoj) z dne 14. junija 2010 o delitvi dela med državami, v katerih so bili dodani ali nadomeščeni nekateri elementi
– having regard to the Conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council (Development Ministers) of 14 June 2010 on Cross-country Division of Labour
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zunanje zadeve (ministri za razvoj) z dne 9. decembra 2010 o vzajemni odgovornosti in preglednosti: četrto poglavje operativnega okvira EU za učinkovitost pomoči
– having regard to the Conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council (Development Ministers) of 9 December 2010 on ‘Mutual Accountability and Transparency: A Fourth Chapter for the EU Operational Framework on Aid Effectiveness
– ob upoštevanju prečiščenega besedila Generalnega sekretariata Sveta Evropske unije z dne 11. januarja 2011 o operativnem okviru za učinkovitost pomoči
– having regard to the consolidated text of the Operational Framework on Aid Effectiveness adopted by the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union on 11 January 2011
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije iz Budimpešte o četrtem forumu na visoki ravni o učinkovitosti pomoči v Busanu v Južni Koreji (2011), sprejete med 21. skupno parlamentarno skupščino AKP-EU v Budimpešti;
– having regard to the Budapest Declaration on the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan, South Korea (2011), adopted at the 21st session of the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly in Budapest,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije iz Dilija z dne 10. aprila 2010 o vzpostavljanju miru in okrepitvi države;
– having regard to the Dili Declaration of 10 April 2010, which concerns peace-building and state-building,
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije iz Bogote z dne 26. marca 2010 o izvajanju načel agende za ukrepanje iz Akre (AUP) v sodelovanju jug–jug;
– having regard to the Bogotá Statement of 26 March 2010, which concerns the implementation of the principles of the Accra Agenda for Action (AAA) in the context of South-South cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju soglasja iz Tunisa z naslovom Učinkovitemu razvoju naproti (Targeting effective development) s 4. in 5. novembra 2010 o afriški agendi za učinkovit razvoj,
– having regard to the ‘Tunis Consensus: Targeting Effective Development’ of 4 and 5 November 2010, which is an African agenda for development effectiveness,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora OECD za razvojno pomoč (ORP) z naslovom Učinkovitost pomoči: poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju Pariške deklaracije iz junija 2009;
– having regard to the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) report on aid effectiveness, which is a progress report on the implementation of the June 2009 Paris Declaration,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z naslovom Aid Effectiveness Agenda: Program učinkovitosti pomoči: koristi evropskega pristopa iz oktobra 2009
– having regard to the Commission report of October 2009 entitled ‘Aid Effectiveness Agenda: Benefits of a European Approach’
Projekt št. 2008/170204 – različica 1. ;
Project No 2008/170204 – Version 1. ,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o akcijskem načrtu EU za enakost spolov in krepitev vloge žensk (2010–2015) (SEC(2010)265) in sklepov Sveta z dne 14. junija 2010 o razvojnih ciljih tisočletja, v katerih je potrdil zadevni akcijski načrt EU,
– having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women´s Empowerment in Development 2010-2015’ ( SEC(2010)0265 ), and to the Council Conclusions of 14 June 2010 on the Millennium Development Goals, which endorse the relevant EU action plan,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila Komisije z naslovom Joint Multi-annual Programming (Skupno večletno načrtovanje programov) iz marca 2011
– having regard to the Commission’s final report of March 2011 entitled ‘Joint Multiannual Programming’
Projekt št. 2010/250763 – različica 1. ;
Project No 2010/250763 – Version 1. ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Krepitev odgovornosti EU pri razvojnem financiranju – prispevek k medsebojnemu pregledu uradne razvojne pomoči EU iz aprila 2011 ( KOM(2011)0218 );
– having regard to the Commission communication of April 2011 entitled ‘Enhancing EU Accountability on Financing for Development towards the EU Official Development Assistance Peer Review’ ( COM(2011)0218 ),
– ob upoštevanju pobude Evropske komisije iz marca 2010 z naslovom Strukturiran dialog – za učinkovito partnerstvo za razvoj, s katero naj bi opredelili praktične načine za večjo učinkovitost organizacij civilne družbe in lokalnih organov v evropskem sodelovanju;
– having regard to the initiative launched by the Commission in March 2010 entitled ‘Structured Dialogue: for an efficient partnership in development’, which seeks to identify practical ways of ensuring more effective involvement of civil society organisations and local authorities in European cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila o oceni pariške izjave: faza 2, objavljenega v maju 2011,
– having regard to the ‘Final Report on the Evaluation of the Paris Declaration: Phase 2’, published in May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju člena 48 svojega poslovnika;
– having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0313/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A7-0313/2011 ),
A. ker bi bilo treba na četrtem forumu na visoki ravni (FVR-4) o učinkovitosti razvojne pomoči opredeliti prihodnje zaveze za učinkovitejšo razvojno pomoč, prispeval pa bo tudi k izvajanju novega mednarodnega sistema pomoči za izpolnjevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja za leto 2015 in pozneje;
A. whereas the Fourth High Level Forum on aid effectiveness (HLF-4) is expected to map out future commitments aimed at making development aid more effective, and to help develop a new international aid architecture in the run-up to the 2015 deadline for achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) and beyond;
B. ker se načela iz Pariške deklaracije osredotočajo predvsem na mehanizme razdeljevanja pomoči, namesto na oblikovanje uspešne razvojne politike; ker agendo za ukrepanje iz Akre o učinkovitosti pomoči ovira več dejavnikov: finančna kriza, zmanjšanje obsega uradne razvojne pomoči, spremenjena politika nekaterih financerjev, ki zahtevajo več kratkoročnih rezultatov, ter novi javni in zasebni financerji, ki niso del Odbora za razvojno pomoč in katerih pristop ni urejen s sporazumnimi normami sodelovanja;
B. whereas the principles set out in the Paris Declaration focus primarily on the mechanisms of aid delivery rather than on the framing of effective development policy; whereas the Accra Agenda for Action on Aid Effectiveness (AAA) has been hampered by several factors: the financial crisis, a reduction in the level of official development assistance (ODA), changes in the policies of some donors, who wish to see more short-term results´, and the emergence of new public and private donors who are not members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and whose approach is not governed by consensual cooperation standards;
C. ker vedno večji delež celotne uradne razvojne pomoči prihaja iz držav gospodarskem vzponu, ki niso članice OECD;
C. whereas an increasing proportion of total ODA comes from emerging countries which are not members of the OECD;
D. ker so najnovejše študije spremljanja in ocenjevanja pokazale, da so države prejemnice naredile več za izvajanje zavez iz Pariške deklaracije in agende za ukrepanje iz Akre kot države donatorke,
D. whereas recent monitoring studies and assessments have shown that recipient countries have done more than donor countries to implement the commitments set out in the Paris Declaration and the AAA;
E. ker dosedanje konference na visoki ravni niso dale potrebnega političnega pritiska ali pravno zavezujočega okvira in ker tudi z izvajanjem Pariške deklaracije ni bila dosežena pričakovana manjša razdrobljenost pomoči, preveč postopkov pa je še vedno nepreglednih, na primer v zvezi s pogoji,
E. whereas former high level conferences failed to produce the necessary political pressure or a legally binding framework and whereas implementation of the Paris Declaration has failed to produce the anticipated reduction in aid fragmentation, with too many operations still lacking transparency, for example with regard to conditionalities;
F. ker sta preglednost in odgovornost temeljna pogoja za učinkovitost pomoči, ne le med donatorji in vladami prejemnicami, temveč tudi med državo in družbo; ker so se donatorji in partnerske države v agendi za ukrepanje iz Akre dogovorili, da bodo pravočasno razkrili podrobne informacije o sedanjih in prihodnjih pretokih pomoči, da se državam v razvoju omogočita natančnejša priprava proračuna in izvajanje revizij; ker je za države donatorke bistvenega pomena tudi, da podprejo krepitev institucije parlamenta ter udeležbe lokalnih oblasti in organizacij civilne družbe, da bi razvojno politiko trdno zasidrali v demokratičnem procesu;
F. whereas transparency and accountability – both between the governments of donor and recipient countries and between the state and society – are prerequisites for aid effectiveness; whereas donors and partner countries agreed in the AAA to provide detailed information on current and future aid flows in good time to enable developing countries to draw up their budgets and audit their accounts more accurately; whereas, likewise, it remains crucial for donor countries to support the strengthening of the institution of parliament and the involvement of local authorities and civil society organisations, so as to anchor development policy firmly in the democratic process;
G. ker Unija in države članice na svetovni ravni prispevajo več kot polovico uradne razvojne pomoči in ker imajo zato pomembno vlogo v agendi učinkovitosti pomoči;
G. whereas the EU and its Member States contribute more than half of global ODA and therefore play an important role in the aid effectiveness programme;
H. ker je z vidika četrtega foruma pomembno spomniti države donatorke na zavezo, da bodo do leta 2015 namenile 0,7 % BNP/BND razvojni pomoči, da bodo vključile pomembno načelo enakosti med moškimi in ženskami v vse politike in prakse svojih odnosov z državami v razvoju, strožje opredelile URP in upoštevale še vedno veljavna načela agende za ukrepanje iz Akre; ker je treba preseči okvire uradne razvojne pomoči in zgraditi razvojna partnerstva, ki bodo podprla vizijo razvoja, katerega nosilke in gonilo so države same,
H. whereas it is important, in the run-up to the fourth Forum, to remind donor countries of their commitment to devote 0.7% of their GNP/GNI to development aid by 2015, to include a significant gender equality component in all policies and practices in the context of their relations with developing countries, to define ODA more rigorously and to uphold the principles laid down in the AAA, which remain valid, and whereas there is a need to move beyond ODA in order to build partnerships aimed at supporting the emergence of a vision of development that is owned and driven by the countries themselves;
I. ker se področje uporabe razvojne pomoči neprestano spreminja in ker bi se pojav novih donatorjev moral boljše kazati v mehanizmih za učinkovitost pomoči;
I. whereas the development aid landscape is constantly evolving, and whereas aid effectiveness mechanisms should better reflect the emergence of new donors;
J. ker morajo vse oblike financiranja, tudi inovativni mehanizmi financiranja, kot so davek na finančne transakcije in svetovni skladi za zdravje in izobraževanje, utelešati in izvajati načela Pariške deklaracije;
J. whereas all forms of development funding, including innovative financing mechanisms such as the financial transaction tax and the global funds for health and education, must embody and put into practice the principles of the Paris Declaration;
1. poudarja potrebo po ambicioznem stališču Unije na FVR-4, ki bi lahko pomembno prispevalo k poglabljanju in polnemu izvajanju zavez glede učinkovitosti pomoči; glede na pomembnost učinkovitosti pomoči za izboljšanje življenjske ravni in zmanjšanje revščine v državah prejemnicah ter za uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja upa na zastopanost Evropske unije na visoki ravni v Busanu;
Stresses the need for the EU to adopt an ambitious position at HLF-4 with a view to making a substantial contribution to deepening and fully implementing its aid effectiveness commitments; hopes, in view of the importance of aid effectiveness in terms of improving quality of life, reducing poverty in recipient countries and achieving the MDGs, that the EU will send high-level representatives to Busan;
1 a. opominja, da je eden glavnih pogojev za uresničitev agende za učinkovitost pomoči polno sprejetje načela „demokratične odgovornosti“, po katerem je država nosilka razvojne strategije, v kateri se odraža zavezanost vseh nacionalnih zainteresiranih strani;
Points out that one of the prerequisites in order to fulfil the ‘aid effectiveness agenda’ is to embrace fully the principle of ‘democratic ownership’, which means that development strategies must be driven by the countries themselves and reflect a commitment on the part of all national stakeholders;
5. opominja, da učinkovita pomoč pomeni, da se revnim državam omogoči mobilizacija domačih virov prihodkov; v zvezi s tem znova poziva EU, naj se prednostno posveti boju proti davčnim oazam in davčnim utajam, hkrati pa spodbuja alternativne vire za financiranje razvoja, tj. z določitvijo davka na finančne transakcije; EU poziva tudi, naj državam v razvoju zagotovi okrepljeno podporo pri davčnih reformah, da bi podprli delujoče, učinkovite, pravične in trajnostne davčne sisteme, ki bi morali voditi v zmanjševanje revščine in odvisnosti od pomoči;
Points out that aid effectiveness requires poor countries to be able to mobilise domestic revenues; urges the EU once again, therefore, to make the fight against tax havens and tax evasion its utmost priority, while also promoting alternative sources of development finance, for example through the introduction of a financial transaction tax; likewise, urges the EU to give developing countries more help with tax reforms, thereby supporting the establishment of effective, efficient, fair and sustainable tax systems, which should have the effect of reducing poverty and aid dependency;
8 poudarja, da prakse donatorjev v zvezi s preskrbo ovirajo takšno rast, saj zanemarjajo lokalno gospodarstvo; zato poziva donatorje, naj dajo prednost domači in regionalni preskrbi ter tako okrepijo lokalne gospodarske zmogljivosti;
8 Stresses that such growth is being hampered by certain procurement practices on the part of donors, which disregard the local economy; urges donors, therefore, to give preference to local and regional procurement, thereby enhancing local economic performance;
13. opozarja, da finančna pomoč ne zadošča za zagotavljanje trajnega razvoja ter da se morajo lokalne vlade in domači zasebni sektor potruditi za uresničitev projektov v okviru razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; poudarja vlogo zasebnih podjetij, kot so mlada in srednja podjetja, pri ustvarjanju bogastva ter odgovornost držav pri zagotavljanju stabilnosti in pravne države; vztraja, da je v državah prejemnicah pomembno dobro upravljanje;
Points out that financial aid is not in itself enough to guarantee sustainable development and that local government and the domestic private sector must play a major part in implementing MDG-related projects; emphasises the role played by private undertakings, such as small and medium enterprises, in wealth creation and the responsibility of States to guarantee stability and the rule of law; stresses, in that connection, the importance of good governance in recipient countries;
20. pozdravlja sprejetje Kodeksa ravnanja Evropske unije o delitvi dela v okviru razvojne politike in poudarja, da se doslej ta načela niso v celoti izvajala, ker ni bilo politične volje, kar ovira optimalno uporabo evropske pomoči, pa tudi možnost Unije, da igra vodilno vlogo pri delitvi dela v okviru četrtega foruma;
Welcomes the adoption of the EU Code of Conduct on the Division of Labour in Development Policy and stresses that its principles have not been fully implemented to date owing to a lack of political will, which is preventing optimum use of European aid and undermining the EU’s ability to be a driving force in the division of labour in the context of the fourth Forum;
22. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije iz zelene knjige o proračunski podpori, katere namen je predvsem spodbuditi endogeni razvoj partnerskih držav, ter poziva, naj se natančno določijo merila za upravičenost do proračunske pomoči, da se z upoštevanjem dejavnikov, kot je stopnja korupcije v državi, preprečijo morebitne zlorabe ali slaba uporaba tovrstne pomoči,
Welcomes the Commission initiative outlined in the Green Paper on budget support, which seeks primarily to promote local development in partner countries, and calls for budget support eligibility criteria to be tightened up so as to prevent departures from agreed approaches and the misuse of this type of aid, with due account being taken of factors such as a country’s corruption index rating;
24. zahteva, naj nacionalni parlamenti sprejmejo strateške dokumente po državah in letni proračun ob posvetovanju s civilno družbo in lokalnimi organi pred političnim dialogom z donatorji, da bi demokratičnemu nadzoru dali polno veljavo;
Calls on national parliaments to adopt country strategy documents and annual budgets in consultation with civil society and local authorities in advance of any political dialogue with donors, so as to give full weight to democratic scrutiny;
26. opozarja na pomembno vlogo višjih institucij za nadzor nad javnimi financami pri pomoči nacionalnim parlamentom pri njihovi nadzorni vlogi nad stroški za razvoj ter pri spodbujanju učinkovitosti pomoči;
Draws attention to the important role played by supreme audit institutions in assisting national parliaments in their task of scrutinising development-related expenditure and promoting aid effectiveness;
31. meni, da je enakost med spoloma prednostno področje pri oblikovanju razvojnih politik in zato poziva, naj se v celoti vključi v agendo učinkovitosti pomoči ter naj ženske organizacije sodelujejo v vseh razvojnih procesih;
Considers gender equality to be a priority in the shaping of development policies, and consequently calls for it to be fully integrated into the aid effectiveness agenda, and for women’s organisations to play an active part in all development processes;
33. meni, da bi moral biti Evropski parlament glede na svojo vlogo demokratičnega nadzornika še naprej vključen v ponovno opredelitev med trajanjem agende učinkovitosti pomoči, vključno z ustreznim sodelovanjem na srečanju v Busanu;
Maintains that, in view of its role in exercising democratic scrutiny, Parliament should continue to be involved in the ongoing recasting of the aid effectiveness programme, including through appropriate participation in the Busan meeting;
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous)
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Corina Creţu, Véronique De Keyser, Charles Goerens, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Franziska Keller, Bill Newton Dunn, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous
o predlogu direktive Sveta o skupnem sistemu obdavčitve matičnih družb in odvisnih družb iz različnih držav članic (prenovitev)
on the proposal for a Council directive on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (recast)
PRILOGA: PISMO ODBORA ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE...........................................................10
ANNEX: LETTER FROM THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS...................................10
(Posebni zakonodajni postopek – posvetovanje – prenovitev)
(Special legislative procedure – consultation – recast)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2010)0784 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2010)0784 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 115 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7‑0030/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 115 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7‑0030/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 25. marca 2011, naslovljenega na Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve v skladu s členom 87(3) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to the letter of 25 March 2011 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0314/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0314/2011 ),
1. odobri predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen v skladu s predlogi posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije in kakor je bil spremenjen v nadaljevanju;
Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and as amended below;
(9) Glede na obravnavo stalnih poslovnih enot bi države članice morale določiti pogoje in pravne instrumente za zaščito nacionalnih davčnih prihodkov in preprečitev izogibanja nacionalne zakonodaje, skladno z načeli Pogodbe in ob upoštevanju mednarodno sprejetih davčnih predpisov.
(9) In relation to the treatment of permanent establishments Member States may need to determine the conditions and legal instruments in order to protect the national tax revenue and fend off circumvention of national laws, in accordance with the Treaty principles and taking into account internationally accepted tax rules.
(9) Glede na obravnavo stalnih poslovnih enot bi države članice morale določiti pogoje in pravne instrumente za zaščito nacionalnih davčnih prihodkov in preprečitev izogibanja nacionalne zakonodaje ter ekstremnih oblik premajhne obdavčitve ali neobdavčitve , skladno z načeli Pogodbe in ob upoštevanju mednarodno sprejetih davčnih predpisov.
(9) In relation to the treatment of permanent establishments Member States may need to determine the conditions and legal instruments in order to protect the national tax revenue and fend off circumvention of national laws, and to avoid extreme forms of under-taxation or non-taxation, in accordance with the Treaty principles and taking into account internationally accepted tax rules.