natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2027/97 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. oktobra 1997 o odgovornosti letalskih prevoznikov v primeru nesreč,
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 785/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o zahtevah v zvezi z zavarovanjem za letalske prevoznike in operaterje,
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 785/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on insurance requirements for air carriers and aircraft operators,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. februarja 2004 o določitvi skupnih pravil glede odškodnine in pomoči potnikom v primerih zavrnitve vkrcanja,odpovedi ali velike zamude letov ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 295/91
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1008/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. septembra 2008 o skupnih pravilih za opravljanje zračnih prevozov v Skupnosti,
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community,
A. ker Direktiva Sveta 90/314/EGS ureja nekatere vidike organizacije paketih potovanj ter za primer stečaja podjetij, ki se s tem poslom ukvarjajo, določa ustrezno odškodnino in vrnitev potrošnikov na mesto odhoda,
A. whereas Council Directive 90/314/EEC regulates aspects of the package holiday business and provides for appropriate compensation and repatriation of consumers in the event of the bankruptcy of package holiday firms,
B. ker Uredba (ES) št. 2027/97 določa vrsto odgovornosti letalskih prevoznikov v primeru nesreč in ureja vprašanje odškodnin za potnike,
B. whereas Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 establishes the nature of air carriers' liability in the event of accidents and compensation arrangements for passengers,
C. ker Uredba (ES) št. 785/2004 določa zahteve v zvezi z zavarovanjem, ki jih morajo izpolnjevati letalski prevozniki in operaterji ,
C. whereas Regulation (EC) No 785/2004 lays down the insurance requirements air carriers and aircraft operators must meet,
D. ker Uredba (ES) št. 261/2004 določa odškodnino in pomoč potnikom, katerih vkrcanje je bilo zavrnjeno ali leti odpovedani ali pa imajo veliko zamudo,
D. whereas Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 provides for compensation for and assistance to passengers who are denied boarding or whose flights are subject to cancellation or long delay,
E. ker Uredba (ES) št. 1008/2008 uvaja stroga finančna pravila za letalske operaterje,
E. whereas Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 establishes stringent financial rules for aircraft operators,
F. ker se je v zadnjem desetletju močno povečalo število razmeroma majhnih nizkocenovnih letalskih prevoznikov, ki ponujajo lete v priljubljene počitniške kraje, pa tudi število potnikov, ki jih ti prevozniki prevažajo,
F. whereas there has been substantial growth in the last decade in the number of relatively small low-cost carriers flying to recognised holiday destinations and the number of passengers they carry,
G. ker je bilo v zadnjih devetih letih v letalskem sektorju 77 stečajev, zaradi katerih je bilo v nekaterih primerih na tisoče potnikov prisiljenih ostati v kraju počitnikovanja in svoje letalske vozovnice niso mogli izkoristiti za povratni let;
G. whereas there have been 77 bankruptcies in the aviation sector in the last nine years, resulting in some instances in many thousands of passengers being stranded at their destinations and unable to use the return portion of their flight ticket,
6. poziva Komisijo , naj preuči možnost razširitve teh ukrepov tudi na letalske družbe, ki so prenehale delovati in so potnikom s tem povzročile podobne preglavice kot družbe v stečaju;
Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of extending such measures to airlines which have ceased operations and caused passengers similar inconvenience to that caused by airlines which go into bankruptcy;
Komisijo poziva, naj preuči možnost hitre vrnitve letal, ki jih zasežejo nacionalni regulativni organi, da bi se lahko uporabila za vrnitev na mesto odhoda tistih potnikov, ki so obtičali na tujih letališčih;
Calls on the Commission to investigate the quick release of impounded aircraft by national regulatory bodies so that those aircraft can be used to bring stranded people home;
18.11.2009 B7-0154/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0210/2009
18.11.2009 B7-0154/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0210/2009
PE428.772v01-00 B7‑0154/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o odškodninah za potnike v primeru stečaja letalske družbe
PE428.772v01-00 B7‑0154/2009 European Parliament resolution on passenger compensation in the event of airline bankruptcy
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja za ustni odgovor za Komisijo z dne 15. oktobra 2009 o odškodnini za potnike v primeru stečaja letalske družbe ( O-0089/09 – B7‑0210/2009 ),
– having regard to the oral question of 15 October 2009 to the Commission on Passenger compensation in the event of airline bankruptcy ( O-0089/09 – B7-0210/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2027/97 z dne 9. oktobra 1997 o odgovornosti letalskih prevoznikov v primeru nesreč,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2027/97 of 9 October 1997 on air carrier liability in the event of accidents,
A. ker Direktiva Sveta 90/314/EGS ureja nekatere vidike organizacije paketnih potovanj ter za primer stečaja podjetij, ki se s tem poslom ukvarjajo, določa ustrezno odškodnino in vrnitev potrošnikov na mesto odhoda,
A. whereas Council Directive 90/314/EEC regulates aspects of the package holiday business and provides for appropriate compensation and repatriation of consumers in the event of the bankruptcy of package holiday firms,
1. opozarja, da je Komisija izvedla obsežno raziskavo o težavah, ki jih povzročajo stečaji letalskih družb in o njihovem vplivu na potnike;
Recalls that the Commission has undertaken a major study of the difficulties surrounding airline bankruptcy and its impact on passengers;
5. v zvezi s tem opozarja, da poleg nacionalnega regulativnega organa obstaja vrsta drugih možnosti, ki bi jih Komisija morala uporabiti za zaščito položaja potnikov v primeru stečaja letalske družbe in bi morale obsegati tudi obvezno obveščanje potnikov o tveganjih, možnostih zavarovanja in drugih zaščitnih mehanizmih;.
Recalls in this regard that there are a number of options, along with national regulatory controls, which the Commission should pursue in order to protect the position of passengers in cases of airline bankruptcy, and that these should include obligatory information for passengers regarding risk, insurance options and other protective mechanisms;
7. ugotavlja, da bi morali biti tovrstni potrebni zakonodajni ukrepi razumni in dobro uravnoteženi ter letalskim družbam in ustreznim organom držav/Skupnosti ne bi smeli nalagati dodatnih nesorazmernih upravnih in institucionalnih bremen ali izkrivljati konkurence, saj bi to pripeljalo do zvišanja cen potniških vozovnic;
States that any such legislative measures required should be reasonable and well-balanced and should not lead to additional disproportionate administrative and institutional burdens, either for airlines or for the respective state/Community bodies, or distort competition, which would lead to an increase in ticket prices for passengers;
Komisijo poziva, naj preuči možnost hitre vrnitve letalo, ki jih zasežejo nacionalni letalski/regulativni organi, da bi se lahko uporabila za vrnitev na mesto odhoda tistih potnikov, ki so obtičali na tujih letališčih;
Calls on the Commission to investigate the possibility of quick release of impounded aircraft by national aviation authorities/regulators so that those aircraft can be used to bring stranded passengers home;
18.11.2009 B7-0155/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
18.11.2009 B7-0155/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu: območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane – stockholmski program
on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen – Stockholm programme
PE428.773v01-00 B7‑0155/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu: območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane – stockholmski program
PE428.773v02-00 B7‑0155/2009 European Parliament resolution on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen – Stockholm programme
– ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe, zlasti njenih določb o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) in njenega novega pravnega okvira za varstvo temeljnih pravic in krepitev državljanstva Unije, členov 2, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kot je bil spremenjen z Lizbonsko pogodbo, protokola št. 8 k Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije, kot je bil vključen z Lizbonsko pogodbo in zadeva pristop Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ter Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, ki ima enako pravno veljavnost kot pogodbe,
– having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon, in particular its provisions dealing with the area of freedom, security and justice (‘the AFSJ’) and its new legal framework for the protection of fundamental rights and the strengthening of Union citizenship, Articles 2, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union as modified by the Treaty of Lisbon, Protocol No 8 to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) as inserted by the Treaty of Lisbon, relating to the accession of the Union to the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (‘the ECHR’), and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’), which has the same legal value as the Treaties,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. junija 2009 z naslovom Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane ( KOM(2009)0262 ), ki vsebuje pregled prednostnih nalog Komisije glede OSVP za obdobje 2010-2014, njene ocene haaškega programa in akcijskega načrta ( KOM(2009)0263 ) in z njo povezane preglednice izvajanja ( SEC(2009)0765 ), pa tudi prispevkov nacionalnih parlamentov, civilne družbe ter agencij in organov EU,
– having regard to the communication from the Commission of 10 June 2009 entitled ‘An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen’ ( COM(2009)0262 ), which outlines its priorities in the AFSJ for 2010-2014, together with its evaluation of the Hague Programme and Action Plan ( COM(2009)0263 ) and the associated implementation scoreboard ( SEC(2009)0765 ), as well as to the contributions made by national parliaments, civil society and EU agencies and bodies,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka dokumenta predsedstva Sveta z dne 16. oktobra 2009 z naslovom Stockholmski program – Odprta in varna Evropa za državljane (14449/09),
– having regard to the Council Presidency's draft document of 16 October 2009 entitled 'The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe serving the citizen' (14449/09),
– ob upoštevanju skupnih odločitev Odbora za pravne zadeve, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za ustavne zadeve v skladu s členom 51 poslovnika,
– having regard to the joint deliberations of the Committee on Legal Affairs, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs pursuant to Rule 51 of the Rules of Procedure,
A. ker je bilo OSVP od začetka veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe bistveni cilj Evropske unije; ker je nujno, da se vrnemo k izvirnemu duhu programa iz Tampereja, ki je zajel vidike kazenskega in civilnega prava ter se osredotočil na pravno državo ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin;
A. whereas ever since the entry into force of the Amsterdam Treaty, the AFSJ has been an essential objective of the European Union; whereas it is essential to return to the original spirit of the Tampere Programme, which embraced aspects of criminal and civil law, focusing on the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms,
B. ker globalizacija ne vpliva le na finančni sektor, temveč vedno bolj na OSVP; ker je potreben bolj celosten pristop oblikovanja politik, skupaj z ukrepi za reševanje nujnih vprašanj migracij in azila, še zlasti poziva k globljim izmenjavam in sodelovanju med tistimi, ki so vključeni v politike pravosodja in notranjih zadev, razvoja, mednarodne trgovine in socialnih zadev,
B. whereas globalisation affects not only the financial sector but increasingly the AFSJ; whereas it necessitates a more holistic policy approach together with measures to tackle the urgent questions of migration and asylum, and calls especially for deeper exchanges and cooperation between those involved in the policies of justice and home affairs, development, international trade and social affairs,
C. ker bo Lizbonska pogodba, nedavno potrjena s parlamentarnim glasovanjem ali referendumskim postopkom, preoblikovala pravno podlago, cilje, sredstva in metode odločanja politik, povezanih z OSVP,
C. whereas the Treaty of Lisbon, recently approved either through parliamentary vote or a referendum procedure, will reshape the legal bases, objectives, instruments and decision-making methods of AFSJ-related policies,
D. ker bodo pravice in institucionalna vloga, ki so z Lizbonsko pogodbo prvič dodeljene nacionalnim parlamentom, pozitivno vplivale zlasti na nadaljnji razvoj in delovanje OSVP, nenazadnje zato, ker bo zagotovljeno večje spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti,
D. whereas the rights and institutional role assigned to national parliaments for the first time by the Treaty of Lisbon will have a positive impact on the development and functioning of the AFSJ in particular, not least because it will provide a better guarantee that the subsidiarity principle will be respected,
E. ker na mnogih področjih pravosodja in notranjih zadev nacionalne rešitve niso več primerne in je zato treba oblikovati evropske odgovore na mednarodne izzive, ki jih prinašajo migracije, varnost in tehnologija, vključno z informacijsko in komunikacijsko tehnologijo,
E. whereas, in many areas of justice and home affairs policy, national solutions are no longer adequate and there is thus a need to develop European responses to the international challenges of migration, security and technology, including information and communications technology,
F. ker je odprava nadzora na notranjih mejah EU med največjimi dosežki evropskega povezovanja,
F. whereas the dismantling of the EU's internal border controls is one of the greatest achievements of European integration,
G. ker so državljani na ravni Unije neposredno zastopani v Evropskem parlamentu, države članice pa v Svetu prek svojih vlad, ki so demokratično odgovorne pred nacionalnimi parlamenti; ker mora zaradi tega nujna parlamentarizacija Evropske unije na eni strani temeljiti na razširitvi pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi z vsemi odločitvami Unije, na drugi strani pa na večanju nadzora nacionalnih parlamentov nad njihovimi vladami,
G. whereas citizens are directly represented at Union level in the European Parliament and the Member States are represented in the Council by their respective governments, which themselves are democratically accountable to their national parliaments; whereas, consequently, the necessary parliamentarisation of the European Union must rely, on the one hand, on broadening the European Parliament's powers vis-à-vis all the Union's decision-making and, on the other hand, on greater control of the national governments by their respective parliaments,
H. ker morajo biti skupni ukrepi omejeni na področje pristojnosti Skupnosti, evropske pristope pa je treba sprejeti le, kadar obetajo, da bodo uspešnejši od nacionalnih ukrepov,
H. whereas joint measures must be confined to the Community's area of competence, and whereas European approaches should be adopted only when they promise to be more successful than national actions,
I. ker je treba ohraniti pravice državljanov EU in pravice do zaščite, zlasti zaščite podatkov, skupno pravosodje in notranje zadeve pa morajo ostati pod parlamentarnim nadzorom,
I. whereas EU citizens’ rights and rights of protection, especially data protection, must be preserved, and whereas the common justice and home affairs policy must remain subject to parliamentary supervision,
J. ker mora biti preglednost v zakonodajnem postopku najpomembnejša in ker bi morali imeti državljani in nacionalni parlamenti možnost spremljati in nadzorovati oblikovanje in izvajanje politik, povezanih z OSVP,
J. whereas transparency in the law-making process must be paramount and whereas national parliaments and citizens should be able to follow and monitor the definition and implementation of AFSJ-related policies,
K. ker z Lizbonsko pogodbo predviden pristop Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ne bo vplival na zaščito temeljnih pravic v Uniji, ki temelji na listini o temeljnih pravicah in sodni praksi Sodišča, bo pa dragocen dejavnik dodatne zaščite, čeprav bo treba vzpostaviti jasno razlikovanje med pristojnostmi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Evropskega sodišča,
K. whereas the accession of the Union to the European Convention on the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon, will not affect the protection of fundamental rights in the Union based on the Charter and the case-law of the Court of Justice, and will constitute a precious element of supplementary protection, while bearing in mind that a clear distinction between the jurisdictions of the ECHR and the Court of Justice will have to be established,
L. ker je za odločen in pravočasen boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, goljufijam in korupciji ter za zaščito finančnih interesov EU treba okrepiti policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje, v preiskave bolj sistematično vključevati Europol in Eurojust, ustanoviti evropsko javno tožilstvo ter doseči učinkovite in izmerljive rezultate; ker hočejo državljani EU imeti večjo vlogo pri preprečevanju korupcije,
L. whereas it is necessary, in the interests of combating organised crime, fraud and corruption in a robust and timely manner, and of protecting the financial interests of the EU, to strengthen police and judicial cooperation, to involve Europol and Eurojust more systematically in investigations, to create the office of European Prosecutor, and to achieve effective and measurable results, and whereas EU citizens want the EU to play an enhanced role in combating corruption,
M. ker morajo prednostne naloge za naslednjih pet let na področju civilnega sodstva odražati potrebe, ki jih izražajo posamezni državljani in podjetja,
M. whereas in the field of civil justice the priorities for the next five years must reflect the needs expressed by individual citizens and business,
N. ker vzajemno priznavanje, kot temeljni kamen OSVP, predpostavlja medsebojno spoštovanje in zaupanje v pravni sistem drugih držav; ker sta ti vrednoti možni le ob medsebojnem poznavanju in razumevanju kot osnovi za oblikovanje evropske pravosodne kulture,
N. whereas mutual recognition, as the cornerstone of the AFSJ, requires mutual trust and confidence in other countries' legal systems, and whereas those values can be secured only through mutual knowledge and understanding, thus creating a European judicial culture,
O. ker mora evropski pravosodni prostor temeljiti na evropski pravosodni kulturi odvetnikov, sodstva, in tožilcev, ki ne bo imela podlage zgolj v pravu Unije, temveč se bo razvila tudi z vzajemnim poznavanjem in razumevanjem nacionalnih sodnih sistemov, korenito prenovo univerzitetnih učnih načrtov, izmenjavami, študijskimi obiski in skupnim usposabljanjem ob dejavni podpori evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje in evropske pravne akademije,
O. whereas the European judicial area must be built on a European judicial culture among practitioners, the judiciary and prosecutors which is not only based on Union law but developed through mutual knowledge and understanding of the national judicial systems, a root-and-branch revamping of university curricula, exchanges, study visits and common training with the active support of the European Judicial Training Network and the Academy of European Law,
P. ker je vzajemno zaupanje odvisno tudi od rednih ocen, s katerimi so v procesu na nacionalni in evropski ravni ocenjeni učinkovitost in rezultati posameznih nacionalnih sistemov; ker je v tej zvezi treba omeniti neprecenljivo delo Evropske komisije za učinkovito pravosodje pri Svetu Evrope,
P. whereas mutual trust also depends on an ongoing valuation of the effectiveness and results of the various national systems, conducted at both the national and the European levels; whereas in this connection reference must be made to the invaluable work of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice at the Council of Europe,
, njegovega stališča z dne 24. septembra 2002 o sprejetju sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje UL C 273 E, 14.11.03, str.
, its position of 24 September 2002 on the adoption of a Council decision setting up a European judicial training network OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
; njegove resolucije z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
, its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
, in njegovega priporočila Svetu z dne 7. maja 2009 o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0386 .
, and its recommendation of 7 May 2009 to the Council on development of an EU criminal justice area Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0386 .
R. ker v zadnjih letih močno narašča kibernetski kriminal, kar povzroča zapletene sodne izzive in obremenjuje zmogljivosti sodišč; ker je treba zaradi takšnega razvoja dogodkov preučiti možnost ustanovitve evropskega sodišča za kibernetske zadeve, ki bo specializirano za zadeve v zvezi s kibernetskim kriminalom,
R. whereas cybercrime has been significantly increasing over the past years, leading to more complex judicial challenges and placing a burden on the capacities of courts; whereas, on account of these developments, it is necessary to examine the setting-up of a European Court of Cyber Affairs specialising in matters related to cybercrime,
Prihodnje OSVP v okviru Lizbonske pogodbe
Looking ahead to the AFSJ under the Treaty of Lisbon
– se schengensko sodelovanje, ki pomeni svobodo gibanja oseb v EU, potrdi kot jedro OVSP, schengensko območje pa bi bilo treba dodatno razširiti
– Schengen cooperation, which enshrines the freedom of movement of persons within the EU, is confirmed as the core of the AFSJ and the Schengen area should be further enlarged;
– bosta državljanstvo Unije in varstvo temeljnih pravic postala jedro politik, povezanih z OSVP, dolžnost institucij EU pa bo, da bodo spoštovale načelo enakopravnosti državljanov EU
– Union citizenship and the protection of fundamental rights will become the core of AFSJ-related policies, and EU institutions will be called upon to observe the principle of the equality of EU citizens;
– se bo proces sprejemanja odločitev okrepil z uporabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, nad vsem pa bo sodni nadzor izvajalo Sodišče
– the decision-making process will be strengthened by the use of the ordinary legislative procedure, all under the judicial supervision of the Court of Justice;