natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju obiska visoke predstavnice/podpredsednice v Izraelu in na palestinskih ozemljih od 27. do 29. avgusta 2011,
– having regard to the HR/VP’s visit in Israel and the Palestinian territories on 27‑29 August 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o mirovnem procesu na Bližnjem vzhodu, sprejetih 18. julija 2011,
– having regard to Council conclusions on Middle East Peace Process adopted on 18 July 2011,
A. ker so neposredna pogajanja med Izraelom in Palestino septembra 2010 propadla in doslej še niso bila obnovljena kljub številnim predlogom četverice in Izraela;
A. whereas direct negotiations between Israel and Palestine broke down in September 2010 and have not been resumed to date, despite numerous proposals made by the Quartet and Israel;
B. ker je Mahmud Abas, predsednik palestinskih oblasti, pri varnostnem svetu Združenih narodov vložil prošnjo za članstvo Palestine v tej organizaciji;
B. whereas Mahmoud Abbas, President of the Palestinian Authority, filed a bid for UN membership for a state of Palestine to the United Nations Security Council;
C. ker je zaradi te odločitve predsednika Abasa prišlo do nesporazuma s Hamasom, ki o tej potezi ni mogel izraziti svojega mnenja in je prepovedal javne demonstracije v Gazi v njeno podporo;
C. whereas the decision of Mr Abbas created a rift with Hamas, which was not consulted on this move and has banned public demonstrations in Gaza to support it;
D. ker ima Palestinska osvobodilna organizacija že od leta 1974 status opazovalke v Združenih narodih;
D. whereas the Palestine Liberation Organization has held observer status at the UN since 1974;
E. ker mednarodno sprejeti okviri za mir na Bližnjem vzhodu, kot so resolucije varnostnega sveta ZN št. 242, 338 in 1850 ter časovni načrt, zahtevajo sporazumno rešitev konflikta s pogajanji in zavračajo vsakršno enostransko ukrepanje;
E. whereas internationally accepted frameworks for Middle East peace, such as UN Security Council Resolutions 242, 338, 1850, the Roadmap, call for a mutually – negotiated resolution of the conflict and reject any unilateral actions;
F. ker Izrael še vedno gradi naselja na Zahodnem bregu in v vzhodnem Jeruzalemu;
F. whereas Israel continues its settlement construction in the West Bank and East Jerusalem;
G. ker je zaradi arabske pomladi in sprememb, ki jih je prinesla v soseščino Izraela, rešitev za izraelsko-palestinski konflikt še toliko bolj nujna; ker je egiptovski premier izjavil, da mirovna pogodba njegove države z Izraelom ni „sveta“ in da je vedno mogoče razpravljati o njej ali jo spremeniti;
G. whereas the ‘Arab Spring’ and changes it brought in countries around Israel made it even more urgent to find a solution to the Israeli – Palestinian conflict; whereas the Prime Minister of Egypt said that his country’s peace treaty with Israel was ‘not sacred’ and was always open to discussion or change;
H. ker sta Fatah in Hamas, nasprotujoči si palestinski frakciji, podpisala sporazum o spravi, ki predvideva ustanovitev skupne začasne palestinske vlade pred nacionalnimi volitvami leta 2012;
H. whereas Fatah and Hamas, two rivalling Palestinian factions, signed the reconciliation agreement, which provides for the creation of a joint caretaker Palestinian government ahead of national elections in 2012;
I. ker je Hamas na seznamu terorističnih organizacij EU, saj vztrajno zavrača tri načela četverice: priznanje pravice Izraela do obstoja, sprejetje obstoječih mednarodnih obveznosti palestinskih oblasti in odpoved nasilju;
I. whereas Hamas is included in the EU’s list of terrorist organisations, continuously rejecting the three Quartet Principles: recognition of Israel’s right to exist, acceptance of existing PA’s international obligations and denouncing violence;
J. ker je izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu pozval k ponovnemu začetku neposrednih pogajanj brez vsakršnih pogojev;
J. whereas Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, has called for return to direct talks without any preconditions;
K. ker je Palestina v veliki meri odvisna od mednarodne finančne pomoči, predvsem pomoči EU in ZDA, pa tudi Izraela, ki zagotavlja vodo, elektriko in pomoč pri pobiranju davkov;
K. whereas Palestine is largely dependent on international financial aid, mainly from the EU and the US, as well as Israel, which provides it with water, electricity and assistance in collecting taxes;
L. ker je Evropska unija največja donatorka finančne pomoči Palestincem, vključno s palestinskimi begunci;
L. whereas the European Union is the biggest donor of financial assistance to the Palestinians, including the Palestinian refugees;
M. ker se je 27 držav Evropske unije vzdržalo stališča glede resolucije, ki bo morda predložena generalni skupščini, da bi čim bolj pritisnile na obe strani, naj se vrneta za pogajalsko mizo;
M. whereas the 27 countries of the European Union have withheld their position on a resolution that may come before the General Assembly in order to exert as much pressure as possible on both sides to return to negotiations;
2. poziva obe strani, naj obnovita neposredna pogajanja brez vsakršnih pogojev, da bo mogoče poiskati trajno rešitev; je trdno prepričan, da bo mogoče resničen in trajen mir doseči samo s pogajanji;
Calls on both sides to resume direct talks without any preconditions, so that lasting resolution can be found; firmly believes that the only way to achieve a true and sustainable peace is through negotiations;
6. ugotavlja, da bo Hamas, če se ne bo odrekel nasilju in sprejel načel četverice, ostal na seznamu prepovedanih terorističnih organizacij EU, zaradi česar bo sodelovanje EU z novo palestinsko vlado oteženo;
Notes the fact that unless Hamas denounces violence and accepts the Quartet principles, it will remain on the EU’s list of banned terrorist organizations, therefore making EU’s cooperation with the new Palestinian government difficult;
27.9.2011 B7-0531/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
27.9.2011 B7-0531/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o davčni oprostitvi za mikro- in mala podjetja v EU ter subvencijah za zaposlovanje mladih
on a tax-free allowance for micro and small enterprises in the EU and a bonus for recruiting young people
PE472.716v01-00 B7‑0531/2011 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o davčni oprostitvi za mikro- in mala podjetja v EU ter subvencijah za zaposlovanje mladih
PE472.716v01-00 B7‑0531/2011 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on a tax-free allowance for micro and small enterprises in the EU and a bonus for recruiting young people
A. ker je finančna kriza prizadela zlasti mala podjetja,
A. whereas the financial crisis has affected small businesses in particular,
B. ker je pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem upravičeno namenjena predvsem za doseganje ciljev s področja raziskav in inovacij,
B. whereas assistance for SMEs concerns primarily – and quite rightly – research and innovation-related businesses,
C. ker pa raziskave in inovacije zahtevajo finančna sredstva, ki so malim in srednjim podjetjem le težko dosegljiva,
C. whereas, however, research and innovation call for available financial resources which SMEs do not always have,
D. ker je treba upoštevati tudi, da evropsko podjetniško strukturo sestavljajo večinoma mala in srednja podjetja,
D. whereas the European business structure consists mainly of small and medium-sized enterprises,
E. ker imajo tudi mikropodjetja z do deset zaposlenimi koristno in posebno vlogo v gospodarstvu naših držav,
E. whereas micro-enterprises, having no more than around ten employees, play a useful and special role in the economies of our countries,
F. ker ponoven vzpon gospodarstva ovira tudi huda kriza zaposlovanja mladih,
F. whereas the serious youth unemployment crisis is also hampering recovery,
2. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj mikro- in malim podjetjem za tri leta omogočijo subvencije v vrednosti letnih socialnih prispevkov, če zaposlijo mlade delavce za nedoločen čas.
Calls on the Council and Commission to aid micro and small enterprises by means of a cash bonus, equal to the value of annual social security contributions for three years, if they recruit a young worker on an open-ended contract.
5.10.2011 B7-0532/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanjem za ustni odgovor B7‑0440/2011 , 0621/2011 in B7‑0439/2011
5.10.2011 B7-0532/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Questions for Oral Answer B7‑0440/2011 , 0621/2011 and B7‑0439/2011
o pridružitvi Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen
PE472.717v01-00 B7‑0532/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pridružitvi Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
PE472.717v01-00 B7‑0532/2011 European Parliament resolution on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen
– ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 8. junija 2011 o osnutku sklepa Sveta o uporabi določb schengenskega pravnega reda v Republiki Bolgariji in Romuniji P7_TA(2011)0254 .
– having regard to its legislative resolution of 8 June 2011 on the draft Council decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania P7_TA(2011)0254 .
– ob upoštevanju sklepov srečanja Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve, ki je 9. in 10. junija 2011 potekalo v Luksemburgu vnesti naknadno
– having regard to the conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council held in Luxembourg on 9 and 10 June 2011 to be completed.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 24. in 25. junija 2011 vnesti naknadno.
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 24 and 25 June 2011 to be completed.
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj Svetu in Komisiji z dne 29. septembra 2011 o pridružitvi Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju ( O-000224/2011 - B7 0440/2011, O-000225/2011 - B7 0621/2011, O-000223/2011 - B7 0439/2011),
– having regard to the questions of 29 September 2011 to the Council and the Commission on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen ( O-000224/2011 – B7‑0440/2011 , O-000225/2011 – B7‑0621/2011 , O-000223/2011 – B7‑0439/2011 ),
A. ker je prosti pretok oseb temeljna pravica, ki jo Pogodbi zagotavljata vsem državljanom EU;
A. whereas the free movement of persons is a fundamental right guaranteed to EU citizens by the Treaties;
B. ker sta vzpostavitev schengenskega območja in vključitev schengenskega pravnega reda v okvir EU med največjimi dosežki procesa evropskih integracij;
B. whereas the creation of the Schengen area and the integration of the Schengen acquis into the EU framework is one of the greatest achievements of the European integration process;
C. ker sta Romunija in Bolgarija izpolnili vsa merila za uspešen zaključek schengenske evalvacije;
C. whereas Romania and Bulgaria have fulfilled all the criteria for successful conclusion of the Schengen evaluation process;
D. ker sta Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 8. junija 2011 in Svet v svojih sklepih z dne 9. junija 2011 potrdila pripravljenost obeh držav za pristop k schengenskemu območju;
D. whereas both countries’ preparedness for joining the Schengen area was certified by Parliament in its resolution of 8 June 2011 and by the Council in its conclusions of 9 June 2011;
E. ker so se na zasedanju Evropskega sveta 24. junija 2011 predsedniki držav in vlad dogovorili, da je treba odločitev o pridružitvi Bolgarije in Romunije sprejeti najkasneje v septembru 2011;
E. whereas, during the European Council of 24 June 2011, the heads of state and government agreed that the decision concerning the accession of Bulgaria and Romania should be taken no later than September 2011;
F. ker je bila odločitev o pristopu Romunije in Bolgarije preložena po tem, ko Svet na svojem srečanju dne 22. septembra 2011 o tem ni mogel glasovati;
F. whereas the decision on the accession of Romania and Bulgaria has been postponed following the Council’s failure to vote during its meeting of 22 September 2011;
3. poudarja, da obe državi v celoti izvajata schengenski pravni red, ki je glede na njuni pristopni pogodbi in obstoječi pravni okvir EU edini pogoj za pristop k schengenskem območju;
Underlines that both countries have fully implemented the Schengen acquis , which –according to their Accession Treaty and the existing EU legal framework – is the only prerequisite for their accession to the Schengen area;
5. ponovno poudarja podporo Parlamenta širitvi schengenskega območja na Bolgarijo in Romunijo ter poziva Evropski svet, naj v skladu s Pogodbo EU sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za pridružitev teh držav k schengenskemu območju;
Reiterates Parliament’s support for enlarging the Schengen area to include Bulgaria and Romania, and calls on the European Council to proceed in accordance with the EU Treaty and to take the necessary measures to enable Romania and Bulgaria to accede to the Schengen area;
6.10.2011 B7-0533/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanjem za ustni odgovor B7‑0440/2011 in B7‑0621/2011 ter B7‑0439/2011
6.10.2011 B7-0533/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Questions for Oral Answer B7‑0440/2011 , B7-0621/2011 and B7‑0439/2011
PE472.718v01-00 B7‑0533/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pridružitvi Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju
PE472.718v01-00 B7‑0533/2011 European Parliament resolution on the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen
A. ker med glasovanjem Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve 22. septembra 2011 o pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskem območju zaradi nizozemskega in finskega veta ni bilo doseženo soglasje;
A. whereas the vote on Bulgarian and Romanian accession to the Schengen zone within the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 22 September 2011 did not reach a unanimous decision due to the Dutch and Finnish veto;
B. ker sta Francija in Nemčija izrazili dvom o tem vprašanju;
B. whereas France and Germany showed doubts on this issue;
C. ker Romunija in Bolgarija nista izpolnili meril schengenskega pravnega reda v zvezi z bojem proti korupciji in organiziranemu kriminalu, poleg tega pa Bolgarija ni sprejela vseh potrebnih ukrepov za spopadanje s predvidenim povečanjem tokov priseljevanja na mejah z Grčijo in Turčijo;
C. whereas Romania and Bulgaria did not achieve the Schengen acquis in the fight against corruption and organised crime as well as, regarding Bulgaria, the adoption of measures aimed at facing the increase of the migratory floods expected at the borders with Greece and Turkey;
D. ker bi lahko z odpravo nadzora na notranjih mejah spodbudili izseljevanje osumljenih zločincev v druge države članice, kar bi povzročilo povečanje kriminalitete, prezasedenost zaporov ter zmanjšanje varnosti in javnega reda;
D. whereas the removal of checks at the internal borders can encourage the emigration of suspected criminals to the other Member States causing an increase of the criminality, prison overcrowding and a decrease in security and public order;
1. poudarja, da morata Svet in Komisija glede pridružitve Bolgarije in Romunije k schengenskemu območju spoštovati načelo soglasja;
Stresses that the Council and the Commission must respect the unanimity principle to let Bulgaria and Romania join the Schengen zone;
o pripravah na zasedanje Evropskega sveta 23. oktobra 2011
on preparation for the European Council meeting (23 October 2011)
PE472.719v01-00 B7‑0534/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pripravah na zasedanje Evropskega sveta 23. oktobra 2011
PE472.719v01-00 B7‑0534/2011 European Parliament resolution on preparation for the European Council meeting (23 October 2011)
– ob upoštevanju govora o stanju Unije z dne 28. septembra 2011,
– having regard to the State of the Union speech of 28 September 2011,
- načrt EU za dokapitalizacijo evropskih bank,
- an EU plan for the recapitalisation of European banks,
- prenos Evropskega instrumenta za finančno stabilnost in prihodnjega evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost v pristojnost Unije ter oceno, ali bodo razpoložljiva in predvidena sredstva zadostovala za obvladovanje krize javnega dolga,
- the communitisation of the EFSF and the future ESM, and an assessment of whether the available and envisaged means will suffice to bring the sovereign debt crisis under control,
- tehten evropski načrt za rast, naložbe in zaposlovanje, ki bo vključeval tudi projektne obveznice,
- a meaningful European growth, investment and jobs plan that also includes project bonds,
- načine za izboljšanje prizadevanj držav članic za uskladitev delov njihovih davčnih sistemov, vključno z ukrepi za preprečevanje davčnih goljufij, utaj ali izogibanja davkom,
- ways of improving Member States’ efforts to coordinate and harmonise elements of their tax systems, including measures against tax fraud, evasion and avoidance,
- predlog za hitrejši in močnejši mehanizem, ki bo Komisiji omogočal izvrševanje pravnega reda za področje enotnega trga v državah članicah,
- a proposal for a faster and stronger mechanism which allows the Commission to enforce the Single Market acquis in Member States,
- gospodarsko vlado za euroobmočje, ki bo temeljila na metodi Skupnosti,
- an economic government for the euro area based on the Community method,
- predloge za zaključek prenove ureditve finančnega trga, da bi bilo gospodarstvo EU v prihodnosti odpornejše na krize,
- proposals to complete the overhaul of financial market regulation to make the EU economy more resilient to future crises,
- poročilo o vzpostavitvi sistema za skupno izdajanje evropskih državnih obveznic (euroobveznic) na podlagi solidarne odgovornosti pred koncem leta 2011.
- a report on the setting-up of a system of common issuance of European sovereign bonds (eurosecurities) on the basis of joint and several liability before the end of 2011.
6. poudarja, da je treba demokratično legitimnost in odgovornost takšnega načrta in z njim povezanih ukrepov zagotoviti s sodelovanjem Evropskega parlamenta, zlasti glede vzpostavitve gospodarske vlade;
Emphasises that the democratic legitimacy and accountability of such a plan and any related measure need to be ensured through the involvement of the European Parliament, particularly with regard to the setting-up of an economic government;
PE472.720v01-00 B7‑0535/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pripravah na zasedanje Evropskega sveta 23. oktobra 2011
PE472.720v01-00 B7‑0535/2011 European Parliament resolution on preparation for the European Council meeting (23 October 2011)
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 (EUCO 21/1/10 REV1),
– having regard to European Council Conclusions of 16 September 2010 (EUCO 21/1/10 REV1),
– ob upoštevanju izjav voditeljev na vrhunskih srečanjih skupine G-20 v Washingtonu leta 2008, v Londonu in Pittsburghu leta 2009 ter v Torontu in Seulu leta 2010,
– having regard to the G20 leaders declarations at G20 Summits that have been held in Washington in 2008, in London and Pittsburgh in 2009, and in Toronto and Seoul in 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila finančnih ministrov skupine G-20 in guvernerjev centralnih bank z dne 23. septembra 2011 v Washingtonu, ZDA,
– having regard to the to the Communiqué of 23 September 2011 of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in Washington DC, USA,
A. ker je finančna kriza, ki se je leta 2008 razširila po vsem svetu, v večini držav članic EU povečala javni primanjkljaj iz obdobja pred krizo, sledile pa so napetosti na trgih državnih dolgov v najbolj zadolženih, kot so Grčija, Portugalska ali Španija;
A. whereas the financial crisis that spread across the globe in 2008 has amplified the pre-crisis public deficits in most EU Member States, followed by tensions in sovereign debt markets in the most indebted ones, such as Greece, Portugal or Spain;
B. ker se strategije za izhod iz krize držav članic EU z velikim primanjkljajem osredotočajo na varčevalne programe in dokončanje potrebnih strukturnih reform za obnovitev konkurenčnosti in povečanje domačega varčevanja;
B. whereas the crisis exit strategies of EU Member States with large deficits focus on implementing austerity programmes and completing necessary structural reforms with a view to restoring competitiveness and increasing domestic savings;
C. ker so zunanji vidiki gospodarske politike Unije zelo odvisni od njene sposobnosti, da obnovi zaupanje v svoje gospodarstvo in privabi potrebne neposredne tuje naložbe v sektorje z visoko dodano vrednostjo, ki lahko ustvarijo kakovostna delovna mesta; ker se zato, da bi se ta ključni cilj podprl doma, v strategiji Evropa 2020 priporoča, da se nameni 3 % BDP Evropske unije (javni in zasebni skupaj) za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije, da se zagotovi trajnostna rast v prihodnosti;
C. whereas external aspects of the Union’s economic policy are heavily dependent on Union’s ability to restore confidence in its economy and attract necessary foreign direct investment in sectors of great added-value that can generate good quality jobs; whereas to support this key goal domestically, the EU2020 Strategy recommends committing 3% of the EU GDP (public and private combined) in R&D and innovation to ensure sustainable growth in the future;
D. ker bi moral biti regulatorni dialog za odstranitev ali zmanjšanje neupravičenih necarinskih ovir za trgovino in drugih regulatornih ovir pri ključnih strateških partnericah EU ena prednostnih regulatornih nalog nove trgovinske politike EU po strategiji Evropa 2020; meni, da so neutemeljene vse ovire, ki so posledica neusklajenega izvajanja dvostranskih, večstranskih in mnogostranskih pravil trgovanja;
D. whereas removing or reducing unjustified non-tariff barriers to trade and other regulatory obstacles of the EU's key strategic partner countries by means of regulatory dialogue should be one of the key regulatory priorities of the new EU trade policy under the Europe 2020 Strategy; regards as unjustified all barriers resulting from the incoherent implementation of bilateral, plurilateral and multilateral trade rules;
E. ker je mnogostranski in na pravilih temelječ trgovinski sistem, vzpostavljen v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, še vedno najprimernejši za urejanje in spodbujanje odprte in poštene trgovine; Evropska unija bi zato morala še naprej dajati prednost uravnoteženemu izidu pogajanj o razvojni agendi iz Dohe, ki bi podpiral vključevanje v mednarodni trgovinski sistem državam v razvoju, zlasti najmanj razvitim držav med njimi;
E. whereas the rule-based multilateral trading system, established through the World Trade Organisation (WTO), remains the most suitable framework for regulating and promoting open and fair trade; therefore, the EU should continue giving priority to achieving a balanced outcome of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA), which would support the integration of developing countries and particularly the least developed countries (LDCs) in the international trading system;
4. opominja Evropski svet, Svet Evropske unije in Komisijo, naj se za proračun EU in večletni finančni okvir uporabljajo enako stroga pravila o preglednosti, računovodenju in odgovornosti, kot se v okviru evropskega semestra zahteva za nacionalne proračune vseh držav članic EU, da bodo evropski državljani občutili koristi boljšega usklajevanja javnih proračunov in finančnih okvirjev;
Reminds the European Council, the Council of the European Union and the Commission that in order to achieve the benefits of better coordination of public budgets and fiscal frameworks for European citizens, the EU budget and related Multiannual Financial Framework should be subject to equally strict transparency, accounting, and accountability rules as is now being requested as part of the European Semester for the national budgets of all EU Member States;