natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker pogodbe ne omenjajo možnosti, da Komisija umakne zakonodajni predlog,
the Treaties are silent as to the possibility of the Commission withdrawing a legislative proposal,
ker Komisija kljub odsotnosti določb o umiku zakonodajnih predlogov redno umika zakonodajne predloge,
this absence of provisions concerning the withdrawal of legislative proposals has not prevented the Commission from regularly withdrawing legislative proposals,
ker se Parlament, Svet in Komisija ne uspejo sporazumeti o tem, kolikšne pristojnosti naj ima Komisija v zvezi z umikom zakonodajnih predlogov,
Parliament, Council and the Commission seem not to agree on the exact extent to which the Commission is entitled to withdraw its legislative proposals,
ker Komisija kljub tem nesoglasjem redno umika zakonodajne predloge, ne da bi bile zadeve kadar koli predložene Sodišču,
despite these disagreements, the withdrawal of legislative proposals has been a regular practice of the Commission, without ever having given rise to a case brought before the Court,
ker je tudi Parlament včasih pozval Komisijo, naj umakne svoje predloge,
Parliament itself has sometimes in the past asked the Commission to withdraw its proposals,
o odnosih med Parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 26. maja 2005 določa:
on relations between Parliament and the Commission of 26 May 2005 stipulates that:
za vse zakonodajne postopke se "Komisija zavezuje, da bo natančno preučila spremembe k svojim zakonodajnim predlogom, ki jih je sprejel Parlament, z namenom njihovega upoštevanja v morebitnem spremenjenem predlogu" (točka 31),
in all legislative procedures, "the Commission undertakes to carefully examine amendments to its legislative proposals adopted by Parliament, with a view to taking them into account in any amended proposal" (point 31),
da v vseh zakonodajnih postopkih "Komisija pred umikom predlogov o tem obvesti Parlament in Svet" (točka 32),
in all legislative procedures, "the Commission shall give Parliament and the Council prior notification before withdrawing its proposals" (point 32),
da se za zakonodajne postopke, ki ne vključujejo soodločanja, Komisija zavezuje, da bo "po potrebi" umaknila zakonodajne predloge, ki jih je Parlament zavrnil, in da bo tudi pojasnila razloge, zaradi katerih se je odločila ohraniti predlog (točka 33),
in legislative procedures not entailing codecision, the Commission undertakes to withdraw legislative proposals that have been rejected by Parliament, "if appropriate", and also to explain the reasons for not doing so if it decides to maintain the proposal (point 33),
ker bi sporazum o umiku in v potrebni meri o spremembi zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije, temelječ na skupnih smernicah treh institucij, pozitivno prispeval k nemotenemu poteku zakonodajnih postopkov,
an understanding, based on common guidelines between the three institutions, regarding the withdrawal and, to the extent necessary, the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission would positively contribute to the smooth running of legislative procedures,
pozdravlja zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije in meni, da bo umik ali sprememba velike večine njegovih predlogov dejansko prispevala k poenostavitvi zakonodajnega okolja Skupnosti; kljub temu vztraja, da Komisija ustrezno upošteva nasprotovanja, ki jih izraža predsednik Parlamenta v pismu z dne 23. januarja 2006;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission communication, and considers that the withdrawal or modification of the great majority of the proposals mentioned in it will in fact contribute to a simplification of the Community legislative environment, but insists that the Commission should take into proper consideration the objections raised by the President of the Parliament in his letter of 23 January 2006;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija v luči pomislekov Parlamenta ponovno pregledala svoje predloge, preden je sprejela svoje končno stališče; priznava, da je Komisija vsakič, ko pomislekov ni upoštevala, navedla razloge za to in v nekaterih primerih tudi podala možne pobude, preko katerih se bodo želje Parlamenta lahko upoštevale;
Welcomes the fact that, before adopting its final position, the Commission has again reviewed its proposals in the light of Parliament's objections; acknowledges that, in every case in which the Commission has not accepted those objections, it has stated reasons for not doing so and that in some cases it has also indicated possible initiatives by means of which Parliament's wishes could be met;
poudarja, da bi morala v prihodnje Komisija v takšnih primerih podati posebne razloge za umik ali spremembo posameznega predloga in da se ne sme le sklicevati na splošna načela, ki ne podajajo jasnih razlogov, zaradi katerih Komisija meni, da je treba določen predlog umakniti ali spremeniti;
Stresses that in future proceedings of this nature, the Commission should present specific reasons for the withdrawal or the modification of each proposal, and not confine itself to invoking general principles that do not clearly explain the reasons why the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija upošteva cilje Lizbonske agende, preden predlaga umik zakonodajnega predloga; zato obžaluje, da je Komisija umaknila predlog direktive o statutu o evropski vzajemnosti, ki predstavlja enega od ključnih elementov Lizbonske strategije; izraža začudenje, da Komisija navaja različnost nacionalnih zakonodaj kot oviro za pobude Skupnosti; zato poziva Komisijo, da pred koncem leta sproži pobudo za pripravo statuta o evropski vzajemnosti in evropskem združenju;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission takes account of the objectives of the Lisbon Agenda before proposing that a legislative proposal should be withdrawn; regrets therefore that the Commission has withdrawn the proposal for a directive on the Statute for a European mutual society despite the fact that it is one of the key elements of the Lisbon Strategy; expresses its surprise that the Commission adduces the diversity of national legislations as an argument against Community initiatives; calls on the Commission, therefore, to adopt an initiative before the end of the year to enable a Statute for a European mutual society and a European association to be drafted;
poziva Komisijo, naj takoj po svojem imenovanju Parlamentu in Svetu posreduje seznam zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije v predhodni sestavi, ki jih namerava ohraniti;
Asks the Commission, immediately after it has been appointed, to draw up and submit to Parliament and the Council a list stating which of its predecessor's legislative proposals it intends to retain;
poziva Komisijo, da v svoj letni zakonodajni in delovni program vključi seznam predlogov, ki jih namerava umakniti ali spremeniti, ter tako omogoči Parlamentu, da izrazi svoje stališče v skladu s svojimi posebnimi pravicami, kakor jih določajo pogodbe in postopki, opredeljeni v zgoraj navedenem Okvirnem sporazumu;
Asks the Commission to include in its annual legislative and working programme a list of the proposals it intends to withdraw or modify, in order to allow Parliament to express its point of view in accordance with its prerogatives under the Treaties and the procedures laid down in the above-mentioned Framework Agreement;
upošteva dejstvo, da nobena odločba v veljavnih pogodbah Komisiji ne omogoča, da umakne zakonodajni predlog, medtem ko je možnost spremembe zakonodajnega predloga zajeta v načelu iz člena 250(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim lahko Komisija spremeni svoj predlog med postopkom za sprejetje akta Skupnosti; priznava, da se to načelo uporablja tudi za postopek soodločanja iz člena 251 in postopek sodelovanja iz člena 252;
Takes note of the fact that the possibility of withdrawing a legislative proposal by the Commission is not mentioned in any provision of the existing Treaties, while the possibility of modifying a legislative proposal is covered by the principle that the Commission may modify its proposal during the procedure leading to the adoption of a Community act, as expressly provided in Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty; acknowledges that that principle is also applicable to the codecision procedure, provided for in Article 251, and the cooperation procedure, provided for in Article 252;
kljub temu ugotavlja, da znotraj jasno začrtanih meja zmožnost Komisije, da umakne zakonodajni predlog med postopkom za njegovo sprejetje,
Recognises, however, that, within clear limits, the ability of the Commission to withdraw a legislative proposal during a procedure leading to its adoption
izhaja iz njene pravice do zakonodajne pobude in logično dopolnjuje njeno zmožnost, da spremeni svoj predlog,
flows from its right of legislative initiative and constitutes a logical complement to its ability to modify a proposal,
lahko prispeva h krepitvi vloge Komisije v zakonodajnem postopku, in
may contribute to enhancing the role of the Commission in the legislative procedure, and
se lahko obravnava kot pozitiven dejavnik, ki zagotavlja, da postopki za sprejetje akta Skupnosti in medinstitucionalni dialog potekajo v duhu uveljavljanja "interesov Skupnosti";
can be considered as a positive element in ensuring that the procedures leading to the adoption of a Community act and the interinstitutional dialogue are aimed at promoting the "Community interest";
kljub temu vztraja, da je to možnost treba preučiti v luči posebnih pravic, ki jih uživajo različne institucije v zakonodajnem postopku, kakor so opredeljene v pogodbah, in v skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja med institucijami;
Maintains, however, that this possibility must be viewed in the light of the prerogatives of the various institutions in the legislative process, as defined in the Treaties, and in compliance with the principle of loyal cooperation among the institutions;
poudarja, da možnost umika ali spremembe zakonodajnih predlogov ne sme spremeniti vloge posamezne institucije v zakonodajnem procesu na način, da bi bilo ogroženo zakonodajno ravnovesje in da možnost umika predlogov ne pomeni neke vrste "pravice do veta" Komisije;
Stresses that the possibilities of withdrawal or modification must not alter the role of each institution in the legislative process in a way which would endanger the institutional balance, and that the possibility of withdrawing proposals does not signify recognition of some kind of "right of veto" by the Commission;
poudarja, da morajo za umik ali spremembo zakonodajnih predlogov veljati enaka splošna načela kakor za predložitev predlogov Komisije, kar pomeni, da mora biti ta ukrep v skladu z interesom Skupnosti in mora biti ustrezno utemeljen;
Stresses that the withdrawal or modification of legislative proposals must be subject to the same general principles that guide the presentation of proposals by the Commission, namely, it must be guided by the Community interest and must be duly justified;
meni, ne da bi posegal v pristojnost Sodišča, da določi obseg in meje posebnih pravic institucij, kakor jih določajo pogodbe, da bi določitev skupnih smernic institucij o umiku ali spremembi zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije kot dopolnitev ustreznih načel, ki so že določena v Okvirnem sporazumu o odnosih med Parlamentom in Komisijo ter v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, pomenila pomemben korak k olajšanju zakonodajnega procesa in dialoga med institucijami;
Considers, without prejudging the competence of the Court of Justice to define the exact scope and boundaries of the prerogatives vested in the institutions by the Treaties, that the definition of common guidelines by the institutions concerning the withdrawal or the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission, as a complement to the relevant principles already laid down in the Framework Agreement on relations between Parliament and the Commission and the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making, would constitute a positive step towards facilitating the legislative process and the dialogue between the institutions;
predlaga naslednje smernice o umiku in spremembi zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije:
Puts forward the following guidelines on the withdrawal and the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission:
Komisija lahko načeloma umakne ali spremeni zakonodajni predlog kadar koli med postopkom za njegovo sprejetje, vse dokler Svet ne odloči.
the Commission may, in principle, withdraw or modify a legislative proposal at any time during the procedures leading to its adoption as long as the Council has not acted.
če Parlament zavrne zakonodajni predlog ali predlaga bistvene spremembe ali če kako drugače prosi Komisijo, da umakne ali bistveno spremeni zakonodajni predlog, Komisija to stališče ustrezno upošteva.
where Parliament has rejected a legislative proposal or has suggested substantial amendments to it, or where Parliament has in some other way asked the Commission to withdraw or substantially modify a legislative proposal, the Commission shall take this position into proper consideration.
Če se Komisija zaradi pomembnih razlogov odloči, da ne upošteva stališča Parlamenta, razloge za tako odločitev predstavi v izjavi Parlamentu;
If, for important reasons, the Commission decides not to follow the position expressed by Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament,
če Komisija namerava umakniti ali spremeniti zakonodajni predlog na lastno pobudo, o svoji nameri vnaprej uradno obvesti Parlament.
where the Commission intends to withdraw or modify a legislative proposal on its own initiative, it shall give Parliament prior notification of its intention.
Uradno obvestilo, v katerem podaja jasne razloge, zaradi katerih meni, da je treba določen predlog umakniti ali spremeniti, Komisija pravočasno posreduje Parlamentu, da lahko izrazi svoje stališče o zadevi.
This notification shall be given in good time, allowing Parliament the opportunity to give its view on the matter, and shall include a clear explanation of the reasons for which the Commission believes that a specific proposal should be withdrawn or modified.
Komisija ustrezno upošteva stališče Parlamenta.
The Commission shall take the view of Parliament into proper consideration.
Če se Komisija zaradi pomembnih razlogov odloči umakniti ali spremeniti predlog in če je to v nasprotju z željo Parlamenta, razloge za tako odločitev predstavi v izjavi Parlamentu;
If, for important reasons, the Commission decides to withdraw or modify its proposal, against the wishes of Parliament, it shall explain the reasons for that decision in a statement to Parliament;
poudarja, da je obseg, v katerem Komisija upošteva stališča Parlamenta o umiku ali spremembi zakonodajnih predlogov, bistven element političnega zaupanja, na katerem temelji konstruktivno sodelovanje obeh institucij;
Stresses that the extent to which the Commission takes into consideration the views of Parliament in so far as concerns the withdrawal or the modification of legislative proposals constitutes an essential element of the political trust that forms the basis of sound cooperation between the two institutions;
meni, da je treba v primeru, če Komisija umakne ali bistveno spremeni zakonodajni predlog tako, da to vpliva na zakonodajne pristojnosti Parlamenta, zadevo predložiti v obravnavo ustreznim političnim organom Parlamenta; nadalje meni, da lahko v primeru, če Komisija umakne zakonodajni predlog tako, da to vpliva na pristojnosti obeh vej zakonodajnega organa, ti dve umik obravnavata kot ničen in nadaljujeta postopek v skladu s Pogodbami vse do morebitnega sprejetja zadevnega akta;
Considers that, should the Commission withdraw or substantially modify a legislative proposal in a way that affects the legislative prerogatives of Parliament, the question should be referred to the appropriate political bodies of Parliament for political consideration; furthermore, considers that, should the Commission withdraw a legislative proposal in a way that affects the prerogatives of the two branches of the legislative authority, these could consider this withdrawal as non-effective and continue the procedure as provided for in the Treaties up to the eventual adoption of the act in question;
meni, da bi morala Komisija v primeru, če je zakonodajni predlog oblikovan v skladu s členom 138 Pogodbe, ustrezno obvestiti evropske socialne partnerje, da namerava umakniti ali bistveno spremeniti zakonodajni predlog;
Considers that, where a legislative proposal has been formulated in accordance with Article 138 of the Treaty, the Commission should duly inform the European social partners about its intention to withdraw or substantially modify the legislative proposal;
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o priporočilu Sveta o imenovanju člana izvršilnega odbora Evropske centralne banke ( C6-0071/2006 – 2006/0801(CNS) )
European Parliament decision on the Council recommendation for the appointment of an Executive Board Member of the European Central Bank ( C6-0071/2006 – 2006/0801(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta z dne 14. februarja 2006 UL L 47, 17.2.2006, str.
having regard to the Council recommendation of 14 February 2006 OJ L 47, 17.2.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 112(2)(b) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0071/2006 ),
having regard to Article 112(2)(b) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0071/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0136/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0136/2006 ),
daje pozitivno mnenje o priporočilu Sveta o imenovanju Jürgena Starka za člana izvršilnega odbora Evropske centralne banke;
Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council recommendation to appoint Jürgen Stark as Executive Board Member of the European Central Bank;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep posreduje Svetu in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the governments of the Member States.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o odobritvi pristopa Evropske skupnosti k Ženevskemu aktu Haaškega sporazuma o mednarodni registraciji modelov, sprejetemu v Ženevi dne 2. julija 1999 ( KOM(2005)0687 – C6-0061/2006 – 2005/0273(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision approving the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs, adopted in Geneva on 2 July 1999 ( COM(2005)0687 – C6-0061/2006 – 2005/0273(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2005)0687 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2005)0687 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 308 in drugega stavka prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 308 and 300(2), first subparagraph, second sentence, of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0061/2006 ),
having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0061/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0166/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0166/2006 ),
odobri predlog sklepa Sveta;
Approves the Commission proposal;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi uredb (ES) št. 6/2002 in (ES) št. 40/94 za uveljavitev pristopa Evropske skupnosti k Ženevskemu aktu Haaškega sporazuma o mednarodni registraciji modelov ( KOM(2005)0689 – C6-0058/2006 – 2005/0274(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulations (EC) No 6/2002 and (EC) No 40/94 to give effect to the accession of the European Community to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement concerning the international registration of industrial designs ( COM(2005)0689 – C6-0058/2006 – 2005/0274(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0689 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0689 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 308 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0058/2006 ),
having regard to Article 308 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0058/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0167/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0167/2006 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
A6-0144 in 0150/2006
A6-0144 and 0150/2006
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o sklenitvi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju ( 2004/2099(ACI) - 2006/2028(ACI) )
European Parliament decision on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management ( 2004/2099(ACI) - 2006/2028(ACI) )
ter zlasti točke 26 Sorazuma,
, and in particular point 26 thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. junija 2005 o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007–2013 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0224 .
having regard to its resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0224 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. decembra 2005 o Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0453 .
having regard to its resolution of 1 December 2005 on the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0453 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. januarja 2006 o stališču Evropskega sveta glede finančne perspektive in obnove Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma za obdobje 2007–2013 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0010 .
having regard to its resolution of 18 January 2006 on the European Council's position on the Financial Perspective and the renewal of the Interinstitutional Agreement 2007-2013 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0010 .
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije: Predlog obnove Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in ukrepih za izboljšanje proračunskega postopka ( KOM(2004)0498 ),
having regard to the Commission working document: Proposal for renewal of the Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure ( COM(2004)0498 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije: Prispevek k medinstitucionalnim pogajanjem o predlogu obnove Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka ( KOM(2006)0075 ),
having regard to the Commission working document: Contribution to the Interinstitutional negotiations on the proposal for renewal of the Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure ( COM(2006)0075 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije: Spremenjeni predlog obnove Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka ( KOM(2006)0036 ),
having regard to the Commission working document: Revised proposal for renewal of the Interinstitutional agreement on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure ( COM(2006)0036 ),