natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se zaveda dejstva, da je v končnem sporazumu veliko število primanjkljajev ostalo brez rešitve – kot na primer vključitev izjav o regionalnem in nacionalnem upravljanju; poudarja, da se je pojavila potreba po dodatnem financiranju za politične prednostne naloge EU, zlasti za program Galileo, ETI in instrument za hrano, in da je bila najdena rešitev prek obstoječih instrumentov iz Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz dne 17. maja 2006; ugotavlja, da sam Svet ni mogel izvajati sporazuma Evropskega sveta, ki je nameraval dodeliti 5 000 000 000 EUR iz proračuna EU za načrt za oživitev in podporo; meni, da bomo znotraj veljavnega večletnega finančnega okvira in Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma potrebovali dodatne prilagoditve, ki temeljijo na zadostnem in ambicioznem pregledu;
Recalls its awareness of the fact that a number of deficits remained unresolved in the final agreement - such as the introduction of regional and national management declarations; stresses that the need for additional financing for EU political priorities, notably for Galileo, the European Institute of Technology and the food facility arose and a solution was found through the use of the existing instruments of the IIA of 17 May 2006; notes that the Council itself has been unable to implement the European Council's agreement seeking to allocate EUR 5 000 000 000 from the EU budget to the economic recovery and support programme; believes that further adjustments within the current MFF and IIA based on a sufficient and ambitious review will be necessary;
poudarja, da je treba razlikovati med pregledom nekaterih programov znotraj trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira, ki temeljijo na vmesnem pregledu zakonodaje, ki bo potekala v obdobju 2010–2011, obstoječih izzivih, ki izhajajo iz nezadostnega financiranja razdelka 4 in razdelka 1a, in na novih izzivih kot so energija, podnebne spremembe, državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravica, boj proti kriminalu, skupna zunanja in varnostna politika (SZVP) in druge politike, povezane z novimi pristojnostmi iz Lizbonske pogodbe, in pripravo novega večletnega finančnega okvira; poudarja, da podaljšanje sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira še toliko bolj izpostavlja potrebo po ambicioznem vmesnem pregledu;
Points out that a distinction should be made between the review of certain programmes within the current MFF based on the mid-term evaluation of legislation to take place in 2010-2011, the existing challenges resulting from the insufficient financing of heading 4 and heading 1a, and the new challenges such as energy, climate change, citizenship, freedom, security and justice, the fight against organised trans-border crime, Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and other policies linked to the new competences provided by the Treaty of Lisbon and the preparation of the new MFF; stresses that a prolongation of the present MFF makes an ambitious mid-term review an even more necessary precondition;
poudarja, da trenutne okoliščine in številne negotovosti, ki so na eni strani povezane s postopkom ratifikacije Lizbonske pogodbe in na drugi strani s koncem trenutnega zakonodajnega obdobja Parlamenta, izidi evropskih volitev in oblikovanjem nove Komisije v trenutnih gospodarskih okoliščinah, ne bodo omogočali oblikovanja podrobnih stališč, ki imajo za cilj ambiciozen pregled v naslednjih mesecih; poudarja pa, da bi moral biti ambiciozen pregled nujna prednostna naloga za novi Parlament in novo Komisijo;
Stresses that the current context and a number of uncertainties linked to the ratification process of the Treaty of Lisbon on the one hand, and, on the other, the end of the current parliamentary term, the outcome of the European elections and the setting-up of the new Commission in the current economic context, will not permit detailed positions aiming at an ambitious review to be taken in the coming months; stresses, though, that an ambitious review should be an urgent priority for the new Parliament and Commission;
zato meni, da bi moral realistični vmesni pregled potekati v treh korakih:
Is therefore of the opinion that a realistic mid-term review should develop in three steps:
(i) reševanje primanjkljajev in ostankov v okviru letnih proračunskih postopkov, če je mogoče prek večje prožnosti in, če je treba, z uporabo dela rezerve, ki je ostal pod zgornjo mejo lastnih sredstev,
(i) resolving deficits and left-overs in the context of the annual budgetary procedures, if possible through more flexibility and, if necessary, using part of the margin left below the own resources ceiling,
ocena vmesnega vrednotenja,
assessment of the mid-term evaluation,
(i) priprava morebitne prilagoditve in podaljšanja trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira do leta 2015/2016, da se omogoči gladek prehod sistema na petletni večletni finančni okvir, pri katerem bosta imela vsak sklic Parlamenta in Komisije v času trajanja mandata politično odgovornost za posamezni večletni finančni okvir,
(i) preparation of a possible adjustment and prolongation of the current MFF until 2015/2016 in order to allow for a smooth transition for a system of an MFF of five years' duration which gives to each Parliament and each Commission, during each of their respective terms of office, the political responsibility for each MFF,
morebitne prilagoditve in podaljšanje trenutnih programov, kakor jih predvideva zakonodaja (2010–2011) v skladu z morebitnim podaljšanjem večletnega finančnega okvira, kot je že večkrat zahteval Parlament,
possible adjustments and prolongation of the current programmes as provided for by legislation (2010-2011) in line with the possible prolongation of the MFF, as already demanded several times by Parliament,
priprava naslednjega večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje po letu 2016/2017; za ta korak bo odgovoren Parlament, ki bo izvoljen leta 2014;
preparation of the next MFF starting in 2016/2017; this phase will be the responsibility of the Parliament elected in 2014;
opozarja, da predstavlja zgornja meja lastnih sredstev 1,31 % BND Evropske unije za prevzete obveznosti in 1,24 % BND Evropske unije za plačila; opozarja tudi, da vsako leto ostanejo znatne rezerve pod zgornjo mejo, ki jo določa finančni okvir, zlasti za plačila (8 300 000 000 EUR leta 2007, 13 000 000 000 EUR leta 2008, 7 800 000 000 EUR leta 2009); poleg tega opozarja, da obstajajo ogromne rezerve med zgornjo mejo večletnega finančnega okvira in zgornjo mejo lastnih sredstev EU Sklep Sveta 2000/597/ES, Euratom z dne 29. septembra 2000 o sistemu virov lastnih sredstev Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 253, 7.10.2000, str.
Recalls that the own-resources ceiling represents 1,31 % of EU GNI in commitments and 1,24 % of EU GNI in payments; also recalls that every year significant margins are left below the ceiling set up by the financial framework, notably in payments (EUR 8 300 000 000 in 2007, EUR 13 000 000 000 in 2008, EUR 7 800 000 000 in 2009); moreover recalls that huge margins exist between the MFF ceiling and the ceiling of the EU own resources Council Decision 2000/597/EC, Euratom of 29 September 2000 on the system of the European Communities' own resources (OJ L 253, 7.10.2000, p.
(36 600 000 000 EUR za leto 2010, 44 200 000 000 EUR za leto 2011, 45 000 000 000 EUR za leto in 50 600 000 000 EUR za leto 2013) Zgornja meja lastnih sredstev v višini 1,24 % v primerjavi z zgornjo mejo večletnega finančnega okvira, ki temelji na ocenah za BND EU 27 za leto 2009.
(EUR 36 600 000 000 in 2010, EUR 44 200 000 000 in 2011, EUR 45 000 000 000 in and EUR 50 600 000 000 in 2013) 1.24 % own resources ceiling vs. MFF ceiling based on 2009 estimated EU 27 GNI.
potrjuje svoje stališče iz svoje zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 29. marca 2007, v katerem je poudaril, da je politična povezava med reformo prihodkov in pregledom odhodkov neizogibna in popolnoma razumljiva; meni, da bi se morala oba postopka izvajati vzporedno, z namenom zlitja v skupno celovito in integrirano reformo novega sistema financiranja in porabe EU najpozneje do večletnega finančnega okvira, ki bo postal veljaven leta 2016/2017, za kar bi bilo potrebno predhodno izpeljati pripravljalna dela, vključno z ratifikacijo; zahteva nadaljnjo preučitev sistema, saj bodo z njo prednosti in bremena med državami članicami večinoma dosegla primernejšo raven;
Confirms its position as expressed in its abovementioned resolution of 29 March 2007 in which it stressed that "the political link between the reform of revenue and a review of expenditure is inevitable and perfectly reasonable"; believes that the two processes should be run in parallel with the aim of merging them in a global and integrated reform for a new system of EU financing and spending at the latest for the MFF starting in 2016/2017, which would require the preparatory work, including ratification, to be done beforehand; calls for consideration of a system whereby benefits and burdens between the Member States come to a generally more adequate level;
meni, da trenutna svetovna gospodarska kriza ne sme vplivati na skupno količino virov EU, tudi če bo BND držav članic prenehal slediti vedno rastoči krivulji; zato je prepričan, da se morajo odhodki EU osredotočiti na politike z jasno evropsko dodano vrednostjo, ki je popolnoma v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, sorazmernosti in solidarnosti; opozarja, da v času krize obseg te dodane vrednosti v veliki meri temelji na temeljnem načelu solidarnosti med evropskimi narodi;
Believes that the general magnitude of EU resources must not be affected by the current world economic crisis, even if the Member States' GNI will cease to follow an ever increasing curve; is therefore convinced that EU spending should concentrate on policies with a clear European added value, fully in line with the principles of subsidiarity proportionality and solidarity; recalls that in a time of crisis this added value is measured largely in terms of the fundamental principle of solidarity between European peoples;
poudarja, da mora dobro finančno poslovodenje, izboljšano upravljanje s strani držav članic in usklajevanje političnih prednostnih nalog in finančnih potreb ostati prednostna naloga v prihajajočih letih in da si je treba prizadevati za doseganje tega cilja prek predhodne identifikacije pozitivnih in negativnih prednostnih nalog, in ne prek zgornjih meja, ki si jih sami naložijo, zato meni, da mora imeti večletni finančni okvir večjo stopnjo prožnosti; poudarja, da so izzivi, s katerimi se sooča Unija (kriza v prehrambenem, energetskem in finančnem sektorju), bili v njeni preteklosti le redko tako pomembni; meni, da pravi evropski odgovor na te krize zahteva mednarodne zakonodajne in proračunske ukrepe;
Stresses that sound financial management, improved management by the Member States and the Commission matching political priorities and financial needs should remain a priority for the coming years, and that this objective should be pursued through prior identification of positive and negative priorities rather than through self-imposed ceilings, therefore believes that the MFF should have a greater degree of flexibility; emphasises that the challenges facing the EU (with crises in food, energy and the financial sectors) are of a magnitude rarely seen in its history; considers that a truly European response to these crises requires international legislative and budgetary measures;
meni, da se politične prednostne naloge Unije zaradi globalizacije, demografskih sprememb, tehnološkega razvoja, potrebe po zagotavljanju zanesljivih in raznolikih virov dobave energije ter podnebnih sprememb stalno razvijajo, da je ponovna ocena in optimizacija porabe EU temeljnega pomena za doseganje največje dodane vrednosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov EU;
Believes, since the Union's policy priorities are in a state of constant evolution as a result of globalisation, demographic change, technological development, the need to ensure secure and diverse sources of energy supply, and climate change, that it is essential that EU spending be re-evaluated and optimised in order to achieve the highest value added and most effective EU action;
prepričan je, da je večja prilagodljivost v postavkah in med njimi absolutno potrebna za zmožnosti delovanja Unije, ne samo za soočanje z novimi izzivi EU, ampak tudi za olajšanje postopka sprejemanja odločitev znotraj institucij; pričakuje, da bo Komisija v svojih prihodnjih predlogih, ki temeljijo na izjavi št. 1 iz Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, s tem v zvezi sprejela ustrezne pobude;
Is convinced that more flexibility within and across headings is an absolute necessity for the functioning capacities of the Union not only to face the new challenges of the EU but also to facilitate the decision-making process within the Institutions; expects the Commission in its forthcoming proposals, based on Declaration No 1 of the IIA of 17 May 2006, to take relevant initiatives in this sense;
opozarja, da je v točki 21 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma predvideno, da se lahko finančni okvir ob nepredvidenih okoliščinah spremeni v skladu z najvišjimi obsegi lastnih sredstev; ponovno kritizira nespametno ravnanje Sveta, ki trdovratno nasprotuje uporabi te možnosti pregleda;
Recalls that Point 21 of the IIA lays down that "in the event of unforeseen circumstances the financial framework may, on a proposal from the Commission, be revised in compliance with the own-resources ceiling"; once again criticises the irrational behaviour of the Council which repeatedly opposes the use of this possibility of revision;
ponovno izraža željo po dejanskih in hitrih izboljšavah pri izvajanju politik EU in zlasti pri izvajanju kohezijske politike s strani držav članic in Komisije; odločno pričakuje skupno zavezo Komisije in Sveta v imenu držav članic novembra 2008 za poenostavitev postopkov (zlasti tako imenovanih Management Control Systems (MCS)), da se tako pospeši plačila in proizvede pozitivne učinke v prihodnjih proračunih; je pripravljen sprejeti politične in upravne ukrepe, če bi trenutne razmere ostale nespremenjene; predlaga, da je poenostavitev postopkov prednostna naloga tudi na drugih področjih, na primer na področju raziskav in inovacij ter politike glede malih in srednje velikih podjetij;
Reiterates its will to see a concrete and rapid improvement of the Member States' and the Commission's implementation of EU policies and of the cohesion policy in particular; firmly expects the joint commitment made by the Commission and the Council on behalf of the Member States in November 2008 to simplify the procedures (notably of the Management Control Systems (MCS)) in order to accelerate payments, and to produce a positive effect in the coming budgets; is ready to take political and administrative measures, should the current situation remain unchanged; suggests that simplification of procedures must be a priority also in other areas, for example research and innovation and SME policy;
ugotavlja, da je treba dati veliko prednost učinkovitemu upravljanju porabe EU; nadalje ugotavlja, da je zlasti pomembno, da dodeljevanje sredstev temelji na objektivnih merilih in stalnem vrednotenju njihove uspešnosti; ocenjuje, da naj se zato spodbuja tesno in uspešno javno-zasebno partnerstvo;
Notes that high priority should be given to effective management of EU spending; notes, further, that it is particularly important that allocations of funds are based on objective criteria and on a continuous evaluation of their performance; considers that strong and efficient Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) should be fostered in this respect;
obžaluje zamudo, ki je nastala pri razmisleku o reformi sistema za financiranje proračuna Unije, ki je še bolj nujna zaradi gospodarske krize; zlasti obžaluje, da se priložnost vzpostavitve sistema za dražbo emisij toplogrednih plinov ni izrabila za začetek temeljne politične razprave o dodeljevanju novih javnih sredstev , ki so bila oblikovana v sklepih Unije; vztraja, da se ta razprava spodbudi v okviru vmesnega pregleda veljavnega večletnega finančnega okvira;
Regrets the slow progress of the debate on reforming the EU budget financing system, which has become even more urgent as a result of the economic crisis; regrets in particular that the opportunity of establishing a system for auctioning greenhouse gas emission rights was not seized so as to launch a fundamental political debate on allocation of the new public resources created by EU decisions; urges that this debate be launched in the context of the mid-term review of the current MFF;
ugotavlja, da države članice v nacionalnih proračunih upoštevajo velik delež ciljev Unije; vztraja, da so tako uporabljena sredstva registrirajo in objavijo v vsaki državi članici, da se tako lažje izmerijo prizadevanja vsake države in bolje ocenijo zneski, ki jih je treba predvideti v proračunu EU na področjih, kjer je treba prizadevanja držav članic spodbuditi oziroma dopolniti;
Notes that a large proportion of the Union's objectives have been taken into account by the Member States in their national budgets; insists that the appropriations thus mobilised be recorded and published in each Member State to make it easier to gauge the effort made by each one and assess the amounts for which provision needs to be made in the EU budget in fields where Member States" efforts need to be encouraged or complemented;
opozarja, da razdelkom 1a, 3 in 4 ni namenjenih dovolj sredstev v sedanjem večletnem finančnem okviru; poudarja, da dodatne politike ne smejo spremeniti ravnovesja med glavnimi kategorijami veljavnega večletnega finančnega okvira, niti ne ogroziti obstoječih prednostnih nalog; poudarja tudi, da če bodo nekatere države članice še naprej vztrajale pri pristopu 1 %, ne bo obstajal proračunski način za financiranje novih prednostnih nalogkar bi moralo biti nesprejemljivo tako za Svet in še zlasti ne za Parlament;
Recalls that headings 1a, 3 and 4 are already under-financed in the current MFF; stresses that additional policies should not change the balance between the main categories of the current MFF nor jeopardise the existing priorities; stresses also that, should some Member States continue to insist on a "1 % approach", there will be no budgetary way to finance new priorities which should not be acceptable for the Council and not at all acceptable for Parliament;
meni, da bi moralo biti nudenje sredstev za Unijo, da se tako izpolnijo njene politične ambicije na področju energetske varnosti in boja proti podnebnim spremembam, del kratkoročnega pregleda, ki je neodvisen od začetka veljave Lizbonske pogodbe; je pripravljen na preučitev možnosti za oblikovanje posebnega sklada v ta namen; poudarja, da mora biti to osrednja prednostna naloga prihodnjega večletnega finančnega okvira, po možnosti prek skupnega sporazuma glede načinov financiranja politik podnebnih sprememb; z dolgoročnega vidika načrtuje oblikovanje nove kategorije, ki bi povezala vse proračunsko primerne politike v boju poti podnebnim spremembam;
Considers that providing the Union with the means to fulfil its political ambition in the areas of energy security and the fight against climate change should be part of a short-term review, independent of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon; is ready to examine the possibility of the creation of a specific fund for that purpose; stresses that this must also be a top priority for the next MFF, preferably through a global agreement on how to finance climate change policies; considers, with a long-term perspective, the creation of a new category bundling all budget-relevant policies in the fight against climate change;
poudarja potrebo po skladnosti politik na tem področju in kaže na potrebo, da se vse glavne programe preveri z vidika podnebnih sprememb, vključno s kmetijskimi programi, kohezijskimi programi, programi za prometna in energetska omrežja in razvojnimi programi;
Stresses the need for policy coherence in this respect and points to the need to carry out a climate change proofing of all major programmes including agriculture, cohesion programmes, transport and energy networks, and development programmes;
ponavlja svojo pripravljenost za začetek pogajanj s Svetom glede predlogov Komisije za financiranje projektov na področju energije in omrežja (širokopasovnega) v okviru načrta EU za oživitev gospodarstva;
Reiterates its readiness to enter into negotiations with the Council on the Commission proposals to finance energy and network projects (broadband) in the context of the EU Recovery Plan;
poudarja, da se trenutnih okoliščin upočasnitve gospodarske rasti ne sme uporabljati kot izgovor za zavlačevanje, ampak, prav nasprotno, kot priložnost za povečanje naložb v zelene tehnologije;
Stresses that the current context of economic slowdown should not be used as a pretext to delay but on the contrary be seen as an opportunity to increase investments in green technologies;
vztraja pri doseganju cilja za povečanje odhodkov za raziskave in razvoj na 3 % BND Evropske unije do leta 2010; poudarja, da so znanstvene raziskave, znanstvena infrastruktura, tehnološki razvoj in inovacije v središču lizbonske strategije in predstavljajo ključne dejavnike za rast, oblikovanje delovnih mest, trajnostni razvoj in konkurenčnost EU;
Insists on pursuing the target of an increase of Research and Innovation expenditure to 3 % of EU GNI by the year 2010; stresses that scientific research, scientific infrastructure, technological development and innovation are at the heart of the Lisbon Strategy and key factors for growth, job creation, sustainable development and EU competitiveness;
poudarja potencial programov s področja izobraževanja, kulture in mladih pri približevanju Evrope svojim državljanom in pri pospeševanju kulturne raznolikosti, kakor tudi medsebojnega razumevanja, poleg vloge, ki jo igra izobraževanje pri doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in pri prilagajanju strokovnega znanja novim izzivom in priložnostim, ki izhajajo iz finančne in gospodarske krize ter podnebnih sprememb;
Underlines the potential of education, culture and youth programmes to bring Europe closer to its citizens and to foster cultural diversity as well as mutual understanding, apart from the role that education plays in reaching the Lisbon targets and in matching skills with the new challenges and opportunities that arise from the financial and economic crisis and from climate change;
poudarja, da se za razdelek 4 "EU kot globalni partner" stalno namenja premalo sredstev; poziva Komisijo k oblikovanju predlogov za: financiranje dolgoročne perspektive, ki bo pomagala doseči razvojne cilje tisočletja, obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz mednarodnega sporazuma o podnebnih spremembah, ki je neodvisen od razvojne pomoči, za preprečevanje sporov in spodbujanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin; za verodostojno sosedsko politiko; ter za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter evropsko varnostno in obrambno politiko (ki sta predmet ustreznih postopkov razrešnic), da se tako izognemo pogostim in neskončnim pogajanjem s Svetom med letnimi proračunskimi postopki; poudarja, da je treba nove potrebe financirati z dodatnimi sredstvi;
Recalls that heading 4 "The EU as a global partner" remains chronically under-financed; asks the Commission to make proposals: for financing with a long-term perspective to help reach the Millennium Development Goals; for commitments resulting from an international climate change agreement independent of development aid; for preventing conflicts and promoting human rights and fundamental freedoms; for a credible neighbourhood policy; and for CFSP/ESDP (subject to adequate discharge procedures), in order to avoid recurrent and endless negotiations with the Council during the annual budgetary procedures; highlights that new needs should be financed with additional resources;