natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
N. ker so voditelji Brazilije, Rusije, Indije, Kitajske in Južne Afrike ob zaključku tretjega srečanja voditeljev držav BRICS 14. aprila 2011 izdali skupno deklaracijo, v kateri so zahtevali več mednarodnega sodelovanja in krepitev upravljanja na svetovni ravni ter izrazili podporo večstranski diplomaciji z Združenimi narodi in skupino G-20; ker je leta 2011 vseh pet držav BRICS hkrati prisotnih v Varnostnem svetu ZN; ker države BRICS pozivajo k spremembi upravnih struktur mednarodnih finančnih institucij in Združenih narodov, tako da bodo odražale spremembe v svetovnem gospodarstvu in bodo bolje obvladovale aktualne svetovne izzive;
N. whereas, at the end of their third meeting on 14 April 2011, the BRICS leaders issued a joint declaration calling for more international cooperation and a strengthening of global governance, and expressing support for multilateral diplomacy with the United Nations and the G-20; whereas all five BRICS countries have been concurrently present in the UN Security Council during 2011; whereas the BRICS have called for change in the governing structures of the international financial institutions and the UN to reflect the changes in the world economy and to better manage today's global challenges;
O. ker so med državami BRICS znatne razlike v političnih in gospodarskih sistemih, demografskih in družbenih trendih ter v zunanjih politikah;
O. whereas the BRICS display considerable divergences in their political and economic systems, demographic and social trends, and foreign policy outlooks;
P. ker je v sklepih Evropskega sveta z dne 16. septembra 2010 poudarjeno, da bi v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo in evropsko varnostno strategijo morale EU in njene države članice ukrepati bolj strateško, da bi resnični vpliv Evrope imel mednarodno veljavo, ter da strateška partnerstva s ključnimi svetovnimi igralci predstavljajo koristen instrument za uveljavljanje evropskih ciljev in interesov;
P. whereas the European Council conclusions of 16 September 2010 stressed that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty and in line with the European Security Strategy, the EU and its Member States would act more strategically so as to bring Europe's true weight to bear internationally and that the EU's strategic partnerships with key players in the world provide a useful instrument for pursuing European objectives and interests;
Q. ker obstoječi trgovinski sporazumi med EU in državami BRICS niso obojestransko koristni le v gospodarskem smislu, temveč obema stranema prinašajo tudi politične koristi;
Q. whereas current trade agreements between the EU and the BRICS countries are not only mutually beneficial in economic terms but also politically beneficial to both sides;
R. ker bi morala EU igrati proaktivno vlogo pri gradnji vključujočega, reprezentativnega in na partnerstvu temelječega sistema Združenih narodov, ki bi lahko učinkovito prispeval k svetovnemu redu in rešitvam, miru in varnosti, demokraciji ter mednarodnemu redu, ki bi temeljil na vladavini prava; ker je EU po členu 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) uradno zavezana uspešni večstranskosti, katere jedro so močni Združeni narodi;
R. whereas the EU should play a proactive part in building an inclusive and representative United Nations system based on partnership, that can effectively contribute to global governance and solutions, peace and security, democracy, human rights and a rule-of-law-based international order; whereas, in accordance with Article 21 of the TEU, the EU is formally committed to effective multilateralism with a strong UN at its core;
S. ker je z leti Evropska unija z državami BRICS razvila dvostranska partnerstva na podlagi skupnih vrednot in interesov, katerih namen je izboljšati odnose in okrepiti sodelovanje na vseh ravneh; ker se je pogosto izkazalo, da ta strateška partnerstva ne zadostujejo, zlasti kar zadeva spodbujanje demokracije, krepitev pravne države in oblikovanje skupnega pristopa k reševanju sporov;
S. whereas over the years the EU has developed with BRICS bilateral strategic partnerships based on shared values and interests aimed at upgrading the relations and enhancing cooperation at all level; whereas these strategic partnerships have often proved to be inadequate with regard, in particular, to promoting democracy, strengthening the rule of law and defining a common approach to the resolution of conflicts;
T. ker je treba nujno poiskati načine za okrepitev sodelovanja v okviru Združenih narodov in v okviru skupin vodilnih držav (G-7, G-20) ter izboljšati usklajevanje njihovega dela;
T. whereas there is an urgent need to seek ways of strengthening cooperation within the United Nations system and within the groups of leading countries (G-7, G-20) and improving the way their work is coordinated;
U. ker je skupina G-20, katere države članice predstavljajo 88 % svetovnega BDP in 65 % svetovnega prebivalstva, postala pomemben forum za sodelovanje na svetovni ravni, vendar pa je treba rešiti vprašanje njene reprezentativnosti in določiti njeno natančno vlogo v arhitekturi večstranskih odnosov;
U. whereas the Group of 20 (G-20), whose member countries account for 88 % of global GDP and 65 % of the world's population, has become an important forum for cooperation at global level, but the problem of its representativeness needs to be resolved and its precise role in the multilateral architecture determined;
2. meni, da imajo odnosi med EU in drugimi glavnimi silami na eni strani ter državami BRICS in drugimi državami v vzponu na drugi strani sicer še vedno pomembno gospodarsko razsežnost, vendar so v bistvu politični in bi morali imeti tudi politični okvir, saj imajo vse države skupen interes, da zagotovijo učinkovit sistem upravljanja na svetovni ravni ter se skupaj, v duhu sodelovanja in posvetovanja ter zbliževanja političnih stališč, soočijo s tveganji, ki ogrožajo svetovno stabilnost in varnost ter lahko zmanjšajo možnosti za svetovno rast; zato poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med EU in državami BRICS, tudi v smislu partnerstva s posameznimi državami BRICS, pri vprašanjih mednarodnega pomena;
Believes that relations between, on the one hand, the established powers and, on the other, the BRICS and other emerging powers maintain a relevant economic dimension, but are essentially political and should thus be politically framed, as all the countries concerned share an interest in ensuring an effective system of global governance and in tackling together, in a spirit of cooperation and consultation, and convergence of policy stances, those global stability and security risks which may pose a threat to sustainable global economic growth and its potential for the future; calls, therefore, for enhanced cooperation between the EU and the BRICS, including in terms of partnerships with individual BRICS countries, on all matters of international concern;
6. ugotavlja, da se zdi, da so države BRICS v preteklosti v nekaterih primerih usklajevale svoja zunanjepolitična stališča v Varnostnem svetu ZN, predvsem ob izbruhu krize v Libiji in Siriji, pa tudi ko so zavlačevale z glasovanjem o vlogi EU v Generalni skupščini ZN ter zavzele podobna stališča glede Slonokoščene obale in Sudana; poudarja, da se zato morda zdi, da države BRICS izpodbijajo obstoječi sistem upravljanja na mednarodni ravni, vendar lahko demokratični dialog, med drugim tudi na individualni ravni, in partnerstvo v ospredje postavita sinergije in pospešita nov, vključujoč sistem upravljanja na svetovni ravni; meni, da bi morala EU ustrezno upoštevati novo politično in gospodarsko vlogo držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu, saj lahko s tem prispeva k mirni reformi svetovnega reda, ne da bi ga destabilizirali;
Notes that in the past the BRICS have appeared to coordinate their stances in foreign policy terms in the UN Security Council in certain instances, most notably at the onset of the Libyan and Syrian crises and, additionally, by deferring the vote on the role of the EU in the UNGA and by adopting coinciding positions on Côte d'Ivoire and Sudan; points out in this regard that the BRICS may seem to be challenging the current system of international governance, but that democratic dialogue, political engagement, including on an individual basis, and true partnership may bring to the fore positive synergies and facilitate a new inclusive system of global governance; believes that the EU should duly take into account the new weight, in political and economic terms, of the BRICS and other emerging powers, as this may contribute to an orderly reform of global governance, based on a convergent platform without any destabilising effects;
11. meni, da morajo odnosi z državami BRICS temeljiti na dvostranskih dialogih, ki zajemajo in spodbujajo nadaljnjo demokratizacijo in utrjevanje pravne države, dobro upravljanje, zbliževanje pravnih ureditev, usklajevanje skupnih stališč na mednarodnih forumih in krepitev odnosov z EU;
Takes the view that relations with the BRICS countries should be built upon bilateral dialogues focusing on and fostering further democratisation and the consolidation of the rule of law, good governance, regulatory convergence, coordination of common positions in international fora and intensified relations with the EU;
14. poudarja pomen in potencial strateškega partnerstva med EU in Indijo; meni, da je treba v času svetovne gospodarske krize vprašanja, kot so družbena kriza, podnebne spremembe, migracijski tokovi in svetovna varnost, reševati v okviru bolj celovitega partnerstva med Indijo in EU; ugotavlja tudi, da potekajoča pogajanja o sporazumu o prosti trgovini krepijo odnose med EU in Indijo; kljub vsemu meni, da ti odnosi ne bi smeli biti omejeni zgolj na trgovinska vprašanja; si želi ponovne vzpostavitve podobnega združenja, kot je delegacija za odnose z Indijo v Evropskem parlamentu, na drugi strani, saj so bile izkušnje s skupino za prijateljstvo med Indijo in Evropo, ki je v indijskem parlamentu delovala do volitev leta 2009, dobre;
Highlights the importance and potential of the EU-India strategic partnership; considers that, in the current global economic crisis, issues such as the social crisis, climate change, migration flows and global security should be addressed in a more comprehensive partnership between India and the EU; notes also that the ongoing free-trade agreement negotiations are reinforcing EU-India relations: considers, however, that this relationship should not be limited to trade issues; would welcome the re-establishment of a counterpart grouping to the European Parliament Delegation for relations with India ,following the experience of the India-Europe Friendship Group, which existed in the Indian Parliament before its 2009 elections;
16. poudarja strateško naravo odnosov med EU in Južno Afriko; pozdravlja pozitivne rezultate četrtega vrha med EU in Afriko septembra 2011, zlasti zbližanje stališč o položaju v Libiji; poziva EU in Južno Afriko, naj čim prej skleneta pogajanja o novem sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu; meni, da lahko Južna Afrika, glede na njen uspešen in miren prehod v demokracijo ter njeno vlogo regionalne sile, postane pomembna sila pri spodbujanju demokracije in dobrega upravljanja, pospeševanju regionalnega gospodarskega povezovanja in podpiranju narodne sprave po vsej Afriki ter ključna partnerica EU pri teh prizadevanjih; poudarja pomen tesnega sodelovanja med EU in Južno Afriko na področju podnebnih sprememb, trajnostnega razvoja in reform mednarodnih institucij;
Underscores the strategic nature of EU-South Africa relations; welcomes the positive outcome of the fourth EU-Africa summit of September 2011, in particular the convergence of views on the situation in Libya; urges the EU and South Africa to conclude, as soon as possible, negotiations on a new Economic and Partnership Agreement; contends that South Africa, given its record of successful and peaceful transition to democracy and its role as a regional power, can be a major force in promoting democracy and good governance, fostering regional economic integration, and supporting national reconciliation across Africa, and a key partner for the EU in these efforts; stresses the importance of close cooperation between the EU and South Africa on climate change, sustainable development and reforms of international institutions;
19. poziva EU, naj za hitrejši napredek pri reformiranju svetovnih institucij za finančno in gospodarsko upravljanje, tj. institucij sistema Bretton Woods, okrepi politični dialog in sodelovanje z državami BRICS, da bi glede na njihov spreminjajoči se gospodarski vpliv zagotovili široko zastopanost vseh članic;
Calls on the EU to enhance political dialogue and cooperation with the BRICS to push further forward the reform of global financial and economic governance institutions, i.e. the Bretton Woods institutions, with the aim of ensuring the broad representation of all member countries while reflecting changes in economic weight;
22. poudarja, da bi morala biti pri vprašanjih svetovnega pomena ali tistih, ki so povezana s svetovnim redom, glavna sogovornica razvitih držav, držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu EU, ne njene države članice; meni, da je za doseganje usklajene politične drže do držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu nujno, da države članice svoje dvostranske odnose gradijo skrajno pregledno in pri tem upoštevajo morebiten vpliv teh odnosov na politike in položaj EU; meni, da bi si morala EU prizadevati za večjo politično in gospodarsko kohezijo in rast, če želi ohraniti politični vpliv in ključno vlogo v nastajajočem večpolarnem sistemu in če želi, da bodo države BRICS in druge države v vzponu v njej videle nujnega in dragocenega sogovornika;
Stresses that for issues of global reach or related to global governance the EU, rather than its Member States, should be the interlocutor of emerged powers, the BRICS and other emerging countries; believes that, with a view to achieving a coherent policy stance towards the BRICS and other emerging powers, it is of fundamental importance that Member States develop their bilateral relations with maximum transparency and bearing in mind the potential impact of such relations on EU policies and stances; believes that the EU should strive to achieve more political and economic cohesion and growth in order to maintain political leverage and a key role in the multipolar system that is taking shape and be perceived as a necessary valuable counterpart by the BRICS and the new emerging countries;
24. meni, da usklajen zunanjepolitični pristop na ravni EU vključuje tudi okrepljeno sodelovanje med predsednikom Evropskega sveta, visoko predstavnico, Svetom, Parlamentom in Komisijo, ko gre za vprašanja, povezana s skupinami G-7, G-8 in G-20;
Takes the view that a coherent foreign policy approach at EU level also entails enhanced coordination between the President of the European Council, the High Representative, the Council, Parliament and the Commission on issues related to the agendas of the G-7, G-8 and G-20;
26. meni, da bi morali biti učinkovita večstranskost in večja usklajenost v večstranskih forumih za reševanje vprašanj svetovnega upravljanja še naprej v središču okrepljenega partnerstva z državami BRICS; predvsem priporoča EU, naj si še naprej prizadeva za to, da bodo države pri tem sodelovale;
Believes that ‘effective multilateralism’ and greater coordination in multilateral fora to address global governance issues should remain the core of enhanced partnership with the BRICS countries; recommends, in particular, that the EU pursue its efforts to engage these countries on this line;
30. poudarja, da bi morala biti poglabljanje odnosov in krepitev političnega sodelovanja z državami BRICS na vladni ravni vedno povezana s trajnim dialogom med organizacijami civilne družbe; v zvezi s tem poziva Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in delegacije EU, naj ustvarijo okvir, ki bo olajšal in okrepil stike med ljudmi ter kulturno in akademsko izmenjavo na podlagi obstoječih in priložnostnih programov, z namenom izboljšati medsebojno razumevanje ter razvijati skupne ukrepe in pobude;
Stresses that any deepening of relations and strengthening of political cooperation with BRICS at governmental level should go along with a sustained dialogue between civil society organisations; calls on the EEAS and EU delegations, in this connection, to create the framework to facilitate and step up people-to-people contacts and cultural and academic exchanges based on existing and ad hoc programmes with a view to improving mutual understanding and developing common actions and initiatives;
36. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje predsedniku Evropskega sveta, predsedniku Komisije, visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko/podpredsednici Komisije, Svetu, poljskemu predsedstvu Sveta Evropske unije, Komisiji in zunanjemu ministrstvu ZDA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union, the Commission, and the US State Department.
Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika (države BRICS) ter druge države v vzponu bi lahko ob nadaljnji gospodarski rasti dobile zelo pomembno zunanjepolitično vlogo na svetovni ravni.
The BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and other emerging economies could gather strong relevance in foreign policy terms on the global scene, provided their economic growth further consolidates.
Obseg gospodarstva sedmih držav v vzponu (Brazilije, Rusije, Indije, Kitajske, Indonezije, Mehike in Turčije) naj bi bil leta 2050 večji od skupnega obsega gospodarstva držav skupine G7 (ZDA, Japonske, Kanade, Združenega kraljestva, Nemčije, Francije in Italije).
In a global economic perspective, seven emerging countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China, Indonesia, Mexico and Turkey) are projected to have larger economies than, collectively, the G-7 countries (USA, Japan, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy) in 2050.
Kitajska naj bi še pred letom 2020 postala država z največjim BDP, Indija pa bi lahko še pred letom 2050 postala najhitreje rastoče gospodarstvo na svetu.
In terms of gross domestic product, China is projected to become the world’s largest economy before 2020 whilst India could become the fastest growing economy in the world before 2050.
Sedanja gospodarska kriza razkriva, da so razvite države in države v vzponu močno medsebojno odvisne in da je utrditev vodilne gospodarske vloge slednjih jasno odvisna od gospodarske uspešnosti in rasti prvih.
As the current economic crisis demonstrates, there is a strong degree of interdependence between emerged powers and emerging powers and the consolidation of the economic leadership of the latter is clearly conditional on the economic welfare and growth of the former.
Na podlagi tega je mogoče preseči povezovanje in sodelovanje zgolj na gospodarskem področju ter si namesto tega prizadevati za razvoj skupne zunanjepolitične platforme, če bo razvit nov sistem upravljanja na svetovni ravni na podlagi skupnih vrednot, v katerega bodo v zadostni meri vključene Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika in druge države v vzponu.
This provides the potential to go beyond comitas and cooperation in economic terms, and strive rather for the creation of a common platform in foreign policy terms, provided a new system of global governance, inclusive enough for the BRICS and other emerging powers and based on shared values, is devised.
V zvezi s tem je treba poudariti, da so Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika že jasno razkrile svoje zunanjepolitične ambicije: od leta 2009 se redno sestajajo in želijo sodelovati na mednarodni ravni.
In this regard, it should be pointed out that the BRICS have already shown clear ambitions in foreign policy terms: they have held regular meetings since 2009 and are seeking engagement at the international level.
Voditelji Brazilije, Rusije, Indije, Kitajske in Južne Afrike so na primer ob zaključku tretjega srečanja 14. aprila 2011 izdali skupno deklaracijo, v kateri so zahtevali več mednarodnega sodelovanja in krepitev upravljanja na svetovni ravni ter izrazili podporo večstranski diplomaciji z Združenimi narodi in skupino G-20.
In particular, at the end of the third BRICS leaders meeting, on 14 April 2011, the BRICS leaders issued a joint declaration calling for more international cooperation, a strengthening of global governance and expressing support for multilateral diplomacy with the United Nations and the G-20.
Poleg tega so poskušale Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika svojo vlogo že večkrat okrepiti tudi z usklajevanjem svojih stališč: vse so se vzdržale glasovanja o resoluciji Varnostnega sveta ZN 1973 (2011) o Libiji (Južna Afrika takrat še ni bila del te skupine držav), zavlačevale so z glasovanjem o vlogi EU v Generalni skupščini ZN ter zavzele ista stališča glede Slonokoščene obale, Sudana in pošiljanja orožja v vesolje.
The BRICS have also been seeking to gather momentum by coordinating their stance on several occasions: they abstained from the vote on UNSC Resolution 1973 (2011) on Libya (South Africa was not yet part of the BRICS at that time), they deferred the vote on EU’s role in UNGA, and sought coinciding positions on Côte d’Ivoire, Sudan and on the placement of weapons in outer space.
Tako se zdi, da Brazilija, Rusija, Indija, Kitajska in Južna Afrika izpodbijajo obstoječi sistem mednarodnega upravljanja.
Thus, the BRICS seem to challenge the current system of international governance.
Vendar bi lahko, če bi vzpostavili nov, vključujoč sistem upravljanja, te države postale dragocene partnerice Zahoda, kot kažejo nedavna reforma Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, imenovanje novega generalnega direktorja sklada in sedanje razprave o soočanju z gospodarsko krizo v Evropi.
However, if an inclusive, new system of governance were to be devised, they could become valuable partners of the West, as the recent reform of the International Monetary Fund, the appointment of its new Director General and the ongoing discussions on how to manage the economic crisis in Europe indicate.
EU bo morala ustrezno upoštevati novo politično in gospodarsko vlogo držav BRICS in drugih držav v vzponu ter s političnimi vzvodi še naprej promovirati univerzalne vrednote v neizogibnem novem večpolarnem sistemu upravljanja na svetovni ravni in imeti vodilno vlogo v procesu reforme sistema upravljanja na mednarodni ravni.
The EU will have to duly take into account the new weight, in political and economic terms, of the BRICS and other emerging powers and use its political leverage to continue to promote universal values in the looming new multi-polar system of global governance and be at the forefront of the process of reform of the international governance system.
Vendar mora EU zato delovati kot enotna in odločna politična in gospodarska entiteta.
For this, however, the EU needs to act as a single and robust political and economic entity.
To je še toliko bolj nujno ob upoštevanju čezmejnih izzivov – kot so podnebne spremembe, vprašanja predpisov na svetovni ravni, dostop do surovin in redkih zemeljskih elementov, terorizem, trajnostni razvoj, svetovna politična stabilnost in varnost – zaradi katerih bo treba oblikovati vključujoč pristop na podlagi pravil, skupnih vrednot, konsenza, tesnih posvetovanj in sodelovanja z novimi državami v vzponu, če želimo najti učinkovite rešitve za čezmejne izzive, ki bodo zares skupne vsem.
This proves all the more necessary, considering that transnational challenges - such as climate change, global regulatory issues, access to raw materials and rare earths, terrorism, sustainable development, global political stability and security – will require a rule-based, inclusive approach based on common values, consensus, close consultation and cooperation with the new emerging powers, if truly shared, effective solutions to transnational challenges are to be found.
EU bi lahko prevzela pobudo in ključno vlogo – in bi jo vsekakor tudi morala – na tem področju.
The EU could and should by all means take initiative in this respect and play a central role.