natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da finančna uredba v primeru, ko dolžnik ne povrne dolga prostovoljno, predvideva, da se lahko izterjava terjatve EU doseže s pravnimi sredstvi ali z nalogom za izvršbo v skladu s členom 256 Pogodbe ES;
Recalls that the Financial Regulation states that the recovery of sums owing to the EU may, should the debtor not voluntarily effect the reimbursement, be secured by judicial means or by an enforcement order obtained pursuant to Article 256 of the EC Treaty;
pozdravlja predloge v zvezi z izterjavo, ki jih je predložila Komisija v okviru spremembe finančne uredbe 2002, katerih bistvo je:
Welcomes, as far as recovery is concerned, the three proposals submitted by the Commission in the framework of the 2002 reform of the Financial Regulation, whose main features are as follows:
priznavanje prednostnega značaja terjatev Skupnosti na podlagi enakovrednosti z davčnimi terjatvami držav članic,
recognition of the privileged nature of debts owed to the Community, on the grounds of equivalence to Member States" tax debts;
petletni rok za izterjavo zneskov, dolgovanih Skupnosti, seveda z možnostjo podaljšanja tega roka, če so bili narejeni dejavni koraki za jamčenje izterjave, to bi ustvarilo večjo varnost za institucije in dolžnike,
a five-year deadline for recovery of sums owed to the Community, subject naturally to the possibility of prolonging this deadline where active steps are being taken to secure recovery; this would create greater security for the institutions and for debtors;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi revizijo finančne uredbe, zlasti njenih pravil za izvajanje za pojasnitev natančne razvrstitve obračunskih pogojev dolgovanih sredstev, ki izhajajo iz posameznih vrst plačil Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission to prepare a revision of the Financial Regulation, especially its implementing rules, with a view to clarifying the exact classification in accrual terms of the sums owed in the context of different types of Community payment;
opozarja, da je ta predlog zajet v členu 3(1) pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe; poleg tega opozarja, da člen 105 pravil za izvajanje razlikuje med vnaprejšnjim financiranjem, vmesnimi plačili in zapiranjem izdatkov ter razlikuje tudi med vnaprejšnjim financiranjem držav članic v okviru izvajanja pogodbe v smislu člena 88 finančne uredbe ali v okviru predpristopne pomoči in predplačil v skladu s členom 265 pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe;
Recalls that this proposal is covered by Article 3(1) of the implementing rules for the Financial Regulation; recalls further that Article 105 of the implementing rules distinguishes between pre-financing, interim payments and closure of the expenditure and that a distinction is also made between pre-financing paid to Member States in performance of a contract within the meaning of Article 88 of the Financial Regulation or under pre-accession instruments and advances pursuant to Article 265 of the implementing rules for the Financial Regulation;
ugotavlja, da je treba urediti izterjavo predplačil v primeru zaključitve projekta zaradi višje sile ali drugih razlogov; ugotavlja tudi, da se takšni primeri lahko uredijo, namesto z izterjavo dolgovanega zneska, prek kompenzacije z zapadlo in nedvomno terjatvijo pogodbenega partnerja do Evropske unije v okviru druge pogodbe;
Notes that arrangements must be made to recover advance payments in cases where a project has to be discontinued owing to force majeure or for other reasons; notes also that such cases can be dealt with not by recovering the sum owed, but rather by offsetting it against a due and certain claim on the European Union by the contractual partner under another contract;
meni, da bi bilo treba zakonita pričakovanja upravičenca praviloma zaščititi, če je porabil denarna sredstva ali prevzel obveznosti v zvezi z denarnimi sredstvi, ki jih ne more preklicati ali jih lahko prekliče le ob nesorazmernih kaznih; meni, da se upravičenec ne more sklicevati na zakonita pričakovanja, če
Takes the view that the legitimate expectations of the beneficiary should as a rule be protected where he has used the monies or made arrangements relating to the monies which cannot be cancelled or can be cancelled only subject to unreasonable penalties; is of the opinion that the beneficiary cannot invoke legitimate expectations where:
je odobritev izdatkov dosegel z namerno prevaro, grožnjo ali podkupovanjem,
he has obtained authorisation of expenditure through deliberate deception, threat or bribery;
je odobritev izdatkov dosegel z zagotavljanjem informacij, ki so bile v pomembnih ozirih nepravilne ali nepopolne, in
the authorisation of expenditure has been obtained by supplying information which in essential respects was incorrect or incomplete; and
je upravičenec poznal nezakonitost ukrepov, na katerih temelji odobritev, ali je ni poznal zaradi velike malomarnosti;
the beneficiary was aware of the illegal nature of the measures on which the authorisation was based or was unaware thereof owing to gross negligence;
meni, da bi morala Komisija v rednih časovnih presledkih Parlamentu predložiti pregled še odprtih terjatev, razčlenjenih po skupnem dolgovanem znesku glede na posamezen generalni direktorat in po starosti odprtih terjatev;
Considers that the Commission should submit to Parliament, at regular intervals, an overview of outstanding amounts to be recovered broken down by the total owed per directorate-general and the length of time for which each amount has been outstanding;
meni, da se morata v pravilih za izvajanje in sektorski zakonodaji upoštevati načeli univerzalnosti in točnosti proračuna, kot sta predvideni v Pogodbi in sedanji finančni uredbi;
Considers that the principles of budget universality and accuracy, as embodied in the Treaty and the Financial Regulation, must be respected by the implementing rules and the sectoral legislation;
meni tudi, da morajo države članice predvsem dokazati, da upoštevajo mednarodne računovodske standarde ter se je treba vprašati, če bi se lahko uporabljali v EU, da bi razvili skupni pristop v tej zadevi;
Considers, furthermore, that the Member States need above all to prove their compliance with international accounting standards, and that it needs to be asked whether that could be used by the EU in order to develop a common approach in the matter;
opozarja, da lahko odredbodajalec v skladu s členom 78(1)(c) finančne uredbe ugotovi, ali so izdatki skladni z določbami pogodbe in da, preden odredbodajalec računovodji pošlje nalog za izterjavo, preveri, ali lahko upravičenec upravičeno pričakuje, da bodo izdatki odobreni in ali bi bilo treba njegova pričakovanja zaščititi ob upoštevanju javnega interesa v zvezi z izterjavo dolgovanih zneskov;
Points out that, pursuant to Article 78(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation, the authorising officer may ascertain whether expenditure is consistent with the provisions of the contract, and that, before the authorising officer can forward the recovery order to the accounting officer, he must consider whether the beneficiary could legitimately expect that the expenditure would be authorised and whether those expectations should be protected given the public interest in the recovery of the sums owed;
ugotavlja, da se premalo uporablja možnost, ki predvideva odobritev dodatnega časa za plačilo ob zagotovitvi jamstva in plačilu zamudnih obresti v skladu s členom 85 pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe, da bi se izterjal vsaj del dolgovanega zneska;
Notes that too little use is made of the possibility of granting the debtor additional time for payment against the lodging of a guarantee and payment of default interest pursuant to Article 85 of the implementing rules for the Financial Regulation with a view to recovering at least a part of the sum owed;
ugotavlja, da izterjava v večini primerov poteka s pobotom s plačilno obveznostjo do pogodbenega partnerja, če so izpolnjeni pogoji za pobot; ugotavlja, da se v primerih, ko pobot ni mogoč, dolgovani znesek končno lahko izterja le tako, da se pogodbenemu partnerju zagrozi, da njegove storitve v prihodnosti ne bodo zaželene, če ne povrne zahtevanega zneska;
Notes that, in most cases, recovery is effected by offsetting the sum owed against a debt payable to the contractual partner, if the conditions governing offsetting have been met; notes also that in cases where offsetting is not possible, the sum owed can ultimately be recovered only by threatening the contractual partner with the discontinuance of his services unless he repays the sum owed;
meni, da je pomembno opozoriti na to, da bi moral odredbodajalec nemudoma obvestiti OLAF, če ugotovi, da izdatki niso skladni s pogodbami ali da je bila odobritev dosežena s prevaro, grožnjo ali podkupovanjem;
Considers it important to point out that the authorising officer should inform OLAF immediately if he establishes that the expenditure is not consistent with the contract or that authorisation was obtained by deceit, threat or bribery;
ugotavlja, da sedem let po aferi z maslom s primesmi "Italburro" ter kljub pozornosti, ki jo zadevi namenjajo evropske institucije, zlasti Evropski parlament in Komisija (OLAF):
Notes that, seven years after the outbreak of the "Italburro" scandal over adulterated butter and despite the attention paid to the matter by the EU institutions, notably Parliament and the Commission (OLAF):
je izterjani znesek manjši od 0,1 % ocenjene vrednosti goljufije;
the sum recovered is less than 0,1% of the estimated amount of the fraud;
po ukrepih italijanskih organov, ki so omogočili razkritje kriminalne mreže, predajo sodišču desetin krivcev, zaseg na stotine ton ponarejenih proizvodov in zbiranje dokazov o tihotapljenju več deset tisoč ton masla s primesmi, poslanega v druge države EU, skoraj ni bilo nadaljnjih ukrepov, sodelovanje na evropski ravni pa je bilo posebej šibko ali pa ga sploh ni bilo;
the action of the Italian authorities, thanks to which it was possible to dismantle the criminal network, bring dozens of perpetrators to justice, confiscate hundreds of tonnes of adulterated products and collect proofs of trafficking in tens of thousands of tonnes of adulterated butter sent to other Member States, has had almost no follow-up, and the level of EU cooperation has been particularly disappointing, if not non-existent;
postopki posameznih držav članic so različni in nezdružljivi, trgovanje s ponarejenimi snovmi je lahko v eni državi članici hudodelstvo, v drugi pa administrativni problem, zato pa je učinek naloga za izterjavo desetkrat manjši od pričakovanega;
the Member States have different and mutually incompatible procedures, and the very fact that trafficking in adulterated substances is a crime in one Member State and a purely administrative problem in another has meant that the sum recovered has been a mere one-tenth of that expected;
javno zdravje je bilo zanemarjeno, doslej ni nihče analiziral morebitne prisotnosti v maslu snovi, prepovedanih v živilskih proizvodih po bolezni norih krav;
public health has been neglected, with no-one to date having analysed the possible contamination of the butter by the use of substances prohibited for food products in the wake of the BSE crisis;
ugotavlja, da čeprav je Komisija potrdila obstoj kršitev v tako imenovani aferi Blue Dragon in se odločila, da prekine izplačila iz skladov EU, povezanih z goljufijo, meni, da je izključna odgovornost države članice, ki deli upravljanje teh skladov, da preišče celoten obseg domnevnih nepravilnosti, izsledi krivce in/ali si prizadeva za odškodnino za žrtve goljufije; ugotavlja tudi, da afera Blue Dragon zadeva dve državi članici, Španijo in Francijo, kar otežuje porazdelitev odgovornosti in daje zadevi očitnejši evropski značaj; meni, da je Komisija javni organ z neposredno odgovornostjo do evropskih državljanov, ki je odvisen od njihovega zaupanja – prek posredovanja Evropskega parlamenta, in da si zato Komisija ne bi smela prizadevati le za povračilo sredstev v evropske sklade od države članice, v kateri so se zgodile zlorabe, ampak si tudi čim bolj prizadevati, da se krivci preganjajo in žrtvam plača odškodnina;
Notes that although the Commission has acknowledged the existence of wrongdoing in the so-called Blue Dragon affair and has decided to cut EU funds corresponding to the fraud, it considers it to be the sole responsibility of the Member State that shares the management of these funds to investigate the full extent of the alleged irregularity, to pursue its culprits, and/or to seek compensation for the victims of the fraud; notes also the fact that the Blue Dragon affair falls between two Member States, Spain and France, which makes the attribution of responsibility more difficult and which gives it a more obviously European character; considers that the Commission is a public authority with direct responsibilities concerning European citizens, on whose trust it depends - through the European Parliament - and that, therefore, the Commission should not only seek to recover European funds from a Member State where they have been misused, but should also use its best endeavours to see that wrongdoers are prosecuted and their victims compensated;
opozarja, da se postopek izterjave terjatev s pravnimi sredstvi ali z nalogom za izvršbo v skladu s členom 256 Pogodbe ES doslej ni uporabljal, razen izjemoma, predvsem za izterjavo denarnih kazni, določenih na področju prava konkurence; se seznani z namenom Komisije v skladu s finančno uredbo, da razširi obseg postopka v prihodnosti;
Recalls that the procedure for recovery of sums owed by legal means by an enforcement order, which may be obtained under Article 256 of the EC Treaty, has thus far been used only in exceptional circumstances, essentially for the recovery of fines imposed in competition cases; notes the Commission's intention, pursuant to the Financial Regulation, to widen the scope of the procedure in future;
ugotavlja, da je postopek izterjave, ki ga uporablja Komisija, institucionalne narave, saj je treba vzpostaviti stik z nacionalnimi organi, ko ni prostovoljnega plačila, ter preveč dolgotrajen, zato se ne more opraviti izterjava terjatve in v najboljšem primeru zastara v škodo finančnih interesov Skupnosti;
Stresses that the procedure currently followed by the Commission with regard to recovery, which is of an institutional nature and consists, in the absence of voluntary payment, of addressing the national authorities, is far too long-winded, and that the forced recovery of the sum owed cannot in that case be effected or, in the best of cases, is subject to delays which are contrary to the Communities" financial interests;
v zvezi z oblikami izvršbe meni, da bi moralo biti obveščanje med Komisijo in državami članicami poenostavljeno ter da bi se morali vzpostaviti bolj neposredni odnosi med službami Komisije in pristojnimi nacionalnimi službami;
Considers, with regard to enforcement orders, that communications between the Commission and the Member States would have to be simplified and that closer links need to be established between the Commission's services and those responsible in the Member States;
meni zato, da je treba po eni strani razmisliti o nadomestilu za nezadostna sredstva, s katerimi razpolagajo nacionalni organi, pristojni za kazenski pregon, da bi pravilno ocenili zapletenost goljufij znotraj EU, in po drugi strani razmisliti o načinu, kako bi lahko zadevni organi Unije računali na nacionalne nadzorne organe, da bi jih pripravili in vključili v preiskavo primerov, povezanih z goljufijami; opozarja, da nacionalni organi, ki delujejo na področju boja proti goljufijam, zaradi svoje narave niso obvezani, da vključijo te organe;
Believes, in addition, that it is necessary to reflect on how to compensate for the lack of means on the part of the national authorities responsible for legal proceedings in order to reach a correct estimate of the complexity of the fraud problem in the EU, and also to consider how the Union bodies responsible should best deal with the national control authorities, in order to alert them and involve them in investigating fraud-related cases; recalls that by their nature the national fraud authorities are not under a binding obligation to involve those bodies;
meni tudi, da je potrebno raziskati možnost boljšega sodelovanja z Eurojustom in Europolom za učinkovitejšo zaščito finančnih interesov Unije ter da bi se lahko vrednotile možnosti doseganja popolne upravne neodvisnosti OLAF-a od Komisije in drugih institucij;
Believes, furthermore, that the possibility of closer cooperation with Eurojust and Europol needs to be explored in order to strengthen the real protection of the Union's financial interests, as well as an evaluation of the possibility of OLAF's full administrative independence from the Commission and the other institutions;
ugotavlja, da je bila sedanja organizacija OLAF v zvezi z neodvisnostjo svojih preiskovalnih dejavnosti na eni strani in svojega upravnega sodelovanja OLAF s Komisijo na drugi strani v posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča 1/2005 označena kot dobro delujoča; zlasti je bilo v tem poročilu ugotovljeno, da je bila neodvisnost v praksi dejansko zagotovljena, ker Komisija ni posegala v delo OLAF;
Notes that the Court of Auditors' Special Report Nº 1/2005 described the present organisation of OLAF in regard to the independence of its investigative activities and its administrative cooperation with the Commission as functioning well, and that, in particular, the report noted that independence was guaranteed in practice, since the Commission had not interfered in OLAF's work;
ugotavlja, da kljub sprejetim ukrepom vprašanje pojasnitve pravil o začetku in zaključku preiskav OLAF kot tudi vprašanje razširitve pravil predpostavljata druge pobude zakonodajnega organa, ki bi morale upoštevati okrepitev povezave med Parlamentom in OLAF;
Notes that, despite the measures already decided, the issue of the clarification of the rules on opening and closing OLAF inquiries, as well as on their extension, will require further legislative initiatives, which should also involve strengthening the link between the Parliament and OLAF;
z zanimanjem pričakuje objavo predloga uredbe Komisije o reformi OLAF;
Awaits with interest the Commission's proposal for a regulation on the reform of OLAF;
opozarja, da se v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi nadomestila koristijo le za zakonite, zdrave in trgu prijazne izdelke ter da je v nasprotnem primeru vsakršna pomoč neupravičena;
Recalls that under the rules in force only legal, healthy and market-friendly products are eligible for refunds, and that products not meeting those conditions are ineligible for aid of any kind;
ugotavlja, kot je opozoril direktor OLAF na zgoranj navedenem srečanju na Bledu, da pomeni goljufija na področju trgovine s kmetijskimi proizvodi očitno možno tveganje za javno zdravje in za zdravje živali;
Observes, as the Director of OLAF pointed out at the above mentioned meeting in Bled, that fraud in trade in agricultural products is a clear potential risk to human and animal health;
poudarja, da je nujno potrebno, da nacionalne in mednarodne kontrolne službe posvečajo temu problemu večjo pozornost ter da lahko le tesno mednarodno sodelovanje, ki bi vključevalo tudi tretje države, dolgoročno zagotovi boljše varstvo potrošnika in finančnih interesov Unije;
Stresses the need to make the national and international control services more aware of this problem, and that only close cooperation at international level, also involving third countries, can in the long term ensure the better protection of the consumer and of the Union's financial interests;
poudarja, da je analiza posameznih nezakonitih praks pokazala nujno potrebo po okrepitvi sodelovanja med nacionalnimi carinami, veterinarskimi službami in organi EU, kot je OLAF;
Stresses that the various illegal practices analysed reveal the urgent need for closer cooperation between the national customs authorities, the veterinary services and EU authorities such as OLAF;
poudarja, da Komisija, v nasprotju z državami članicami, nima pristojnosti nadzora na področju analize proizvodov v zvezi z javnim zdravjem potrošnikov Unije;
Stresses that the Commission, unlike the Member States, has no powers of control as regards product analysis in relation to consumer health in the Union;
opozarja, da goljufija v primeru afere z maslom s primesmi ni bila zdravstvene narave, ampak je zadevala sestavo spornih proizvodov, ki sodijo v sektor, ki prejema visoke zneske subvencij Skupnosti;
Recalls that in the adulterated butter case the initial fraud concerned not a health matter but the composition of the incriminated products, which were from a sector receiving large amounts in Community subsidies;
meni, da bi morala Komisija in OLAF zagotoviti, da države članice preko svojih organov pol-javnega sektorja opravljajo učinkovit nadzor v zadostnem številu z resnično neodvisnimi nadzorniki;
Believes that the Commission and OLAF should ensure that the Member States, through their quasi-public bodies, are able to carry out a sufficient number of properly effective controls using genuinely independent inspectors;
meni, ker ima goljufija lahko v danem trenutku posledice za zdravje, da bi morale biti pristojne zdravstvene službe o njej obveščene in imeti v okviru postopka dostop do vzorcev ter da bi moralo biti trajanje hranjenja takšnih vzorcev bistveno daljše;
Considers that, where a fraud could at a given moment have health repercussions, the health services responsible should be informed and have access, in the context of a properly conducted procedure, to samples, and that such samples should be kept for a considerably longer period;
ugotavlja, da OLAF ne razpolaga z ustreznimi informacijami o količini sumljivih proizvodov, ker je kazenska obravnava preiskav z vidika izterjave pogubna, čeprav lahko OLAF pravno v imenu Komisije spodbija nacionalno odločbo;
Notes that OLAF does not possess suitable information on the quantities of incriminated products, while undertaking the inquiries in a criminal law context has proved disastrous from the viewpoint of recovery, even if it is true that in strictly legal terms OLAF is entitled, on behalf of the Commission, to contest a national decision;
opozarja, da kljub temu, da je v nekaterih državah možen začetek postopka izterjave, čeprav poteka kazenski postopek, ima v drugih kazensko pravo prednost pred civilnim pravom, tako da zaradi dejanja pravnega organa onemogoča izterjavo neupravičeno izplačanega zneska;
Recalls that, while in some countries recovery proceedings may be initiated even if a criminal action is under way, in others the criminal law has precedence over the civil law, so that the existence of an action on the part of a judicial authority makes it impossible to recover the disputed sums;
obžaluje, da se v določenih državah članicah nepravilnosti ali goljufije priznavajo le za zneske, ki se dokažejo posamično, to je po segmentih, če pa teh ni, se subjekt uradno obravnava kot nedolžen;
Deplores the fact that in some Member States irregularities and frauds are admitted only in respect of individually proven sums, that is, lot by lot, and that where no lot is present the operator is automatically deemed innocent;
obžaluje, da Komisija ni izvedla akcijskega načrta iz odstavkov od 39 do 43 zgoraj navedene resolucije o razrešnici za leto 2001 ter iz resolucije o nadaljnjih ukrepih po razrešnici;
Regrets the Commission's failure to implement the action plan referred to in paragraphs 39 to 43 of the above mentioned resolution on the discharge for 2001 and in the resolution on the follow-up to the discharge;