natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker skupno stališče Evropskega sveta, kot je bilo dogovorjeno na zasedanju 15.–16. decembra, predvideva v povprečju 1,045 % BND EU za odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v proračunu EU za 27 držav članic, skupna vsota odobritev za prevzem obveznosti pa znaša 862,363 milijard evrov,
whereas the European Council’s common position as agreed on 15-16 December foresees an average figure of 1.045% of EU GNI in commitment appropriations for 27 Member States within the EU budget, with total commitment appropriations amounting to EUR 862,363 billion,
ker pogajalsko stališče Evropskega parlamenta, sprejeto 8. junija 2005, predvideva finančni okvir 974,837 milijard EUR z odobritvami za prevzem obveznosti, ki znašajo povprečno 1,18 % BND EU, zagotavlja boljšo uskladitev političnih prednostnih nalog in finančnih potreb, posodobitev proračuna s pomočjo večje prilagodljivosti in kakovostnejše izvrševanje;
whereas the European Parliament’s negotiating position adopted on 8 June 2005 ensures a better match of political priorities and financial needs, a modernising of the budget through more flexibility, an improvement in the quality of implementation, with a financial framework amounting to EUR 974,837 billion, representing an average of 1.18% of EU GNI in commitment appropriations,
ugotavlja dejstvo, da je Evropskemu svetu končno uspelo doseči skupno stališče držav članic, ki omogoča začetek pogajanj z Evropskim parlamentom o naslednji finančni perspektivi;
Notes the fact that the European Council finally found a common position between Member States which allows for the opening of the negotiations with the European Parliament on the next Financial Perspective;
ugotavlja, da so sklepi Evropskega sveta osredotočeni na tradicionalne politike, ki jih vodijo države članice, in ne postavljajo v ospredje politik, ki omogočajo Uniji reševanje novih izzivov in razvoj evropske dodane vrednosti za državljane; poleg tega obžaluje, da se države članice borijo za ohranitev svojih nacionalnih interesov in ne spodbujajo evropske razsežnosti ter niso bile zmožne obravnavati glavnega vprašanja reforme sistema lastnih sredstev;
Notes that the conclusions of the European Council focus on traditional policies which are administrated by the Member States rather than putting emphasis on policies enabling the Union to face new challenges and to develop the European added value for citizens; deplores moreover that Member States fight to preserve their national interests rather than to foster the European dimension and were unable to address the major issue of reforming the own resources system;
opozarja, da sklepi Evropskega sveta, ki se včasih nanašajo na zelo posebna pravila v okviru programov porabe, ne morejo prevladati nad pristojnostmi, podeljenimi Evropskemu parlamentu kot eni izmed vej zakonodajnega in proračunskega organa, ter vztraja pri celovitem izvrševanju svoje parlamentarne vloge v opredeljevanju politik, njihove reforme in njihovega proračuna;
Recalls that the conclusions of the European Council - referring sometimes to very specific rules within spending programmes - cannot overrule the powers vested in the European Parliament as one arm of the legislative and budgetary authority and insists to play its full parliamentary role in the definition of policies, their reform and their budget;
zavrača skupno stališče Evropskega sveta v sedanji obliki, ker ne zagotavlja proračuna EU, ki bi v prihodnosti povečal blaginjo, konkurenčnost, solidarnost, kohezijo in varnost v skladu s politikami, ki jih je Svet že določil; ne izpolnjuje prevzetih obveznosti do novih držav članic ter ne predvideva zadovoljivega in natančnega mehanizma prilagodljivosti, trdne zavezanosti, da se opravi revizija in dodeli jasna vloga Evropskemu parlamentu, ali zadovoljivih spremljevalnih ukrepov, na primer za zagotavljanje boljšega izvrševanja in nadzora porabe sredstev v državah članicah;
Rejects the European Council’s common position in its current form, because it does not guarantee an EU budget enhancing prosperity, competitiveness, solidarity, cohesion and security in future, in compliance with policies already decided by the Council itself; it fails to fulfil commitments made towards the new Member States and does not provide for a sufficient and detailed flexibility mechanism, a firm commitment to undertake the review with a clear role for the European Parliament or sufficient accompanying measures for example to ensure better implementation and control of expenditure of funds in Member States;
poudarja pomen, ki ga pripisuje večji stopnji prilagodljivosti,
Underlines the importance it is attaching to a higher degree of flexibility;
ponovno potrjuje svoje stališče, sprejeto 8. junija 2005, in naroči Odboru za proračun, naj se skladno s tem pogaja o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu;
Reaffirms its position voted on 8 June 2005 and charges its Committee on Budgets to negotiate the inter-institutional agreement accordingly;
v skladu s členom 176 Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 176 of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlaga Konferenca predsednikov
on behalf of the Conference of Presidents
o ustanovitvi preiskovalnega odbora v zvezi s polomom družbe Equitable Life
on setting up a Committee of Inquiry on the demise of the Equitable Life Society
Sklep o ustanovitvi preiskovalnega odbora v zvezi s polomom družbe Equitable Life
Decision on setting up a Committee of Inquiry on the demise of the Equitable Life Society
ob upoštevanju člena 193 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 193 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju sklepa Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 1995 o podrobnih določbah glede uveljavljanja pravice Evropskega parlamenta do preiskave (95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ) UL L 113, 19.5.1995, str.
having regard to the Decision of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of April 19 1995 on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of enquiry (95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC) OJ L 113, 19.5.1995, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 176 Poslovnika in njegove Priloge VIII;
having regard to Rule 176 of the Rules of Procedure and to Annex VIII thereto,
ob upoštevanju zahteve, ki jo je vložilo 213 poslancev Evropskega parlamenta;
having regard to the request presented by 213 Members of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju Konference predsednikov dne 14. decembra 2005, na kateri so sklenili načelni dogovor o ustanovitvi preiskovalnega odbora, ki bi preučil obtožbe, podane v peticiji 611/2004 Arthurja Whita in peticiji 29/2005 skupine Equitable Members' Action Group (EMAG) ter v drugih peticijah, ki so jih kasneje glede istega vprašanja vložili predlagatelji iz Nemčije in Irske, vse pa so povezane z družbo Equitable Life;
having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 14 December 2005, agreeing in principle to establish a Committee of Inquiry into the allegations raised by petitions 611/2004 by Arthur White and 29/2005 by the Equitable Members' Action Group (EMAG) and by other subsequent petitions on the same subject submitted by petitioners from Germany and Ireland, all of which related to the Equitable Life Society,
sprejme odločitev o ustanovitvi preiskovalnega odbora, ki bo raziskal domnevne kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti in domnevne nepravilnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti v zvezi s polomom družbe Equitable Life, pri čemer preiskava ne bo imela vpliva na pristojnosti nacionalnih sodišč ali sodišča Skupnosti;
Decides to set up a Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions of Community law and alleged maladministration in the application of Community law related to the demise of the Equitable Life Society, without prejudice to the competences of national or Community courts;
sprejme odločitev, da bo preiskovalni odbor:
Decides that the Committee of Inquiry shall:
∙ raziskal, na kakšen način so v zvezi z družbo Equitable Life pristojne oblasti Velike Britanije izvajale direktivo Sveta 92/96/EGS z dne 10.11.1992 UL L 360, 9.12.1992, str.
∙ investigate the way in which Council Directive 92/96/EEC of 10 November 1992 OJ L 360, 9.12.1992, p.
1. , sedaj uzakonjeno v direktivi 2002/83/ES o življenjskem zavarovanju z dne 5. novembra 2002 UL L 345, 19.12.2002, str.
1. , now codified into the Codified Life Assurance Directive 2002/83/EC of 5 November 2002 OJ L 345, 19.12.2002, p.
1. , še posebej kar zadeva nadzorni režim in določbo o ustreznem nadzoru finančne trdnosti zavarovalnic, vključno z njihovo solventnostjo, oblikovanjem ustreznih rezervacij in kritjem teh rezervacij z ustreznimi sredstvi;
1 , has been applied by the United Kingdom's competent authorities in relation to Equitable Life, notably as regards the regulatory regime and the provision for adequate monitoring of the financial health of insurance undertakings, including their state of solvency, the establishing of adequate technical provisions and the covering of those provisions by matching assets;
∙ v zvezi s tem ocenil, ali je Evropska komisija na ustrezen način izpolnila svojo dolžnost, da nadzoruje pravilen in pravočasen prenos zakonodaje Skupnosti v nacionalno zakonodajo in prepozna morebitne sistemske šibkosti v zvezi z zadevnim vprašanjem;
∙ assess, in this respect, whether the European Commission has properly fulfilled its duty to monitor the correct and timely transposition of Community law, and identify whether systematic weaknesses contributed to the situation that has arisen;
∙ preučil obtožbe, da so bili nadzorni organi Velike Britanije več let, in sicer vsaj od leta 1989, neuspešni pri zaščiti imetnikov zavarovalnih polic, saj so spodleteli pri izvajanju strogega nadzora nad računovodskimi postopki in postopki rezervacij, ki jih je izvajala družba Equitable Life, ter nad njenim finančnim stanjem;
∙ assess allegations that the UK regulators consistently failed, over a number of years, and at least since 1989, to protect policy holders by exercising rigorous supervision of accounting and provisioning practices and the financial situation of Equitable Life;
∙ predložil predloge, ki jih bo ocenil kot potrebne.
∙ make any proposals the Committee deems necessary in this matter.
sprejme odločitev, da bo preiskovalni odbor Parlamentu predstavil vmesno poročilo v roku štirih mesecev po začetku delovanja z namenom, da predstavi končno poročilo v roku 12 mesecev po sprejetju tega sklepa;
Decides that the Committee of Inquiry shall present an interim report to Parliament within 4 months of starting its work, with a view to presenting its final report to Parliament within 12 months of the adoption of this decision;
sprejme odločitev, da bo odbor štel 22 poslancev Evropskega parlamenta.
Decides that the committee will be composed of 22 Members of the European Parliament.
ANNEX : Explanatory statement
ANNEX : Explanatory statement
2000, allegedly as a result of mismanagement and failure to comply with EU law, the Equitable Life Mutual Society was unable to pay the sum of £1.5 billion, as ordered by the House of Lords, to honour its pledge to over one million UK policyholders and more than 15 000 policy holders in other EU countries, notably Germany and Ireland.
2000, allegedly as a result of mismanagement and failure to comply with EU law, the Equitable Life Mutual Society was unable to pay the sum of £1.5 billion, as ordered by the House of Lords, to honour its pledge to over one million UK policyholders and more than 15 000 policy holders in other EU countries, notably Germany and Ireland.
a result, policy holders had to accept dramatic losses and cuts to their savings and private retirement pensions in order to prevent the collapse of Equitable Life.
a result, policy holders had to accept dramatic losses and cuts to their savings and private retirement pensions in order to prevent the collapse of Equitable Life.
The current inquiry by the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman's Office is not able to assess a number of factors including the status of claims by non-UK citizens; neither will it consider matters relating to the application of EU law.
The current inquiry by the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman's Office is not able to assess a number of factors including the status of claims by non-UK citizens; neither will it consider matters relating to the application of EU law.
The actions of the Financial Services Authority also fall outside the UK Ombudsman's jurisdiction.
The actions of the Financial Services Authority also fall outside the UK Ombudsman's jurisdiction.
Hence the need for the European Parliament to act, without prejudice to the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman's competences and proceedings.
Hence the need for the European Parliament to act, without prejudice to the UK Parliamentary Ombudsman's competences and proceedings.
v skladu s členom 175 Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 175 of the Rules of Procedure
ki ustanavlja začasni odbor za preučitev domnev, da ameriška obveščevalna agencija CIA uporablja evropske države za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje zapornikov
setting up a temporary committee on the presumed use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
Sklep, ki ustanavlja začasni odbor za preučitev domnev, da ameriška obveščevalna agencija CIA uporablja evropske države za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje zapornikov
Decision setting up a temporary committee on the presumed use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners
ob upoštevanju zavezanosti Evropske unije načelom svobode, demokracije in spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter vladavini prava, kot je opisano v preambuli Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in predvsem v členih 6 in 7 te Pogodbe,
having regard to the European Union’s attachment to the principles of liberty, democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and of the rule of law as outlined in the preamble to the Treaty on European Union and notably in Articles 6 and 7 of that Treaty,
ob upoštevanju, da je po mnenju Sodišča evropskih skupnosti tudi zaščita človekovih pravic del ustavnega reda Skupnosti,
bearing in mind that, according to the European Court of Justice, the protection of fundamental rights is also part of the constitutional order of the Community,
ob upoštevanju, da je zaščita človekovega dostojanstva ena izmed ključnih nalog iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije, ki so jo proglasile institucije 7. decembra 2000, in da bi bila ta temeljna vrednota kršena v primeru, da iz katerega koli razloga pride do okrutnega, nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja z ljudmi z neposredno ali posredno odgovornostjo katere od držav članic ali institucij EU,
bearing in mind that protecting human dignity is one of the key objectives of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as proclaimed by the institutions on 7 December 2000 and that this fundamental value would be violated in the case of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment of persons if it happens for whatever reason under the direct or indirect responsibility of EU Member States and institutions,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2005 o domnevah, da ameriška obveščevalna agencija CIA uporablja evropske države za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje zapornikov Sprejeto besedilo , P6_TA-PROV(2005)0529 , ki, upoštevajoč preiskavo, ki poteka na Svetu Evrope, predvideva potrebo po ustanovitvi začasnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta, ki bo spremljal tako preiskavo, predvsem glede na to, da so vpletene države članice EU,
having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2005 on presumed use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners Texts Adopted , P6_TA-PROV(2005)0529 , which, as regards the inquiry pending at the Council of Europe, envisages the need for a temporary committee of the European Parliament to be set up to accompany such an enquiry, particularly as European Union Member States are implicated,,
ob upoštevanju člena 175 Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 175 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju predloga konference predsednikov, ki določa naloge in sestavo začasnega odbora, o domnevah, da ameriška obveščevalna agencija CIA ali obveščevalne agencije drugih tretjih držav uporabljajo evropsko ozemlje, vključno s državami pristopnicami, kandidatkami s pridruženimi članicami, za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje zapornikov,
having regard to the proposal of the Conference of Presidents defining the mandate and the composition of the temporary committee on the presumed use of European Union territory, including acceding, candidate and associate countries, by the CIA or the intelligence services of other third countries for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners,
sklene, da ustanovi začasni odbor z naslednjimi nalogami:
Decides to set up a temporary committee with the following mandate:
zbirati in preučiti podatke za dognanje, ali:
to collect and analyse information to find out whether:
- so ameriška obveščevalna agencija (CIA), drugi ameriški agenti ali obveščevalne agencije tretjih držav izvajali ugrabitve, "izredne izročitve", pridržanja na skrivnih lokacijah, zatajena pridržanja, mučenja, okrutnosti, nečloveška ali ponižujoča ravnanja z ujetniki na ozemlju Evropske unije, vključno z državami pristopnicami ali kandidatkami, ali so to ozemlje uporabili v te namene, npr. za lete;
- the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other US agents or intelligence services of other third countries have carried out abductions, ‘extraordinary rendition’, detention at secret sites, detention incommunicado, torture, cruelty, inhuman or degrading treatment of prisoners on the territory of the European Union, including acceding and candidate countries, or have used this territory to these ends, for example through flights;
taka dejanja, ki so se domnevno dogajala na ozemlju Evropske unije v okviru boja proti terorizmu, bi lahko med drugim pomenila kršitev člena 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 2, 3, 5 in 6 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, Listine o človekovih pravicah, Konvencije Združenih narodov proti mučenju in drugim oblikam krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja, in sporazuma med EU in ZDA o izročitvah in medsebojni pravni pomoči, kot tudi drugih mednarodnih pogodb in sporazumov, ki so jih sklenili Evropska unija/skupnost in njene države članice, vključno s Severnoatlantsko pogodbo in z njo povezanih sporazumov o statusu sil ter Konvencije o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu;
- such actions, allegedly carried out in the territory of the European Union in the framework of the fight against terrorism, could be considered a violation inter alia of Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the North Atlantic Treaty and its related agreements on the status of forces and the Convention on International Civil Aviation;
- so med osebami, ko so vpletene ali ki so bile žrtve ugrabitev, "izrednih izročitev", pridržanj na skrivnih lokacijah, zatajenih pridržanj, mučenj, okrutnosti, nečloveških ali ponižujočih ravnanj, tudi državljani EU;
- EU citizens have been among those involved in or subjected to abductions, ‘extraordinary rendition’ operations, detention at secret sites, detention incommunicado, or torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment;
- so v nezakoniti odvzem prostosti posameznikom, vključno z njihovo ugrabitvijo, izročitvijo, prevozom, pridržanjem ali mučenjem, vpleteni tudi države članice, javni uradniki, osebe med opravljanjem uradne dolžnosti ali evropske institucije, ki so pri tem sodelovali ali proti temu niso ukrepali;
- Member States, public officials, persons acting in an official capacity or European Union institutions have been involved or complicit in illegal deprivation of liberty of individuals, including abduction, rendition, transfer, detention or torture, either by action or omission;
na plenarnem zasedanju predložiti vsako priporočilo, za katerega odbor meni, da je v tem primeru potrebno, predvsem glede političnih, pravnih in upravnih zaključkov, ki jih bo potrebno potegniti na evropski ravni, kot tudi možnih posledic za odnose EU s tretjimi državami;
to submit to the plenary any recommendation that the committee deems necessary in this matter, notably concerning the political, legal and administrative consequences to be drawn at European level as well as possible consequences for EU relations with third countries;
sklene, da se bo začasni odbor povezal in kolikor bo mogoče tesno sodeloval s Svetom Evrope in njegovim generalnim sekretariatom, parlamentarno skupščino, evropskim komisarjem za človekove pravice, komisarjem Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, kot tudi z nacionalnimi parlamenti;
Decides that the temporary committee will liaise and cooperate as closely as possible with the Council of Europe and its Secretary-General, the Parliamentary Assembly, the European Commissioner for Human Rights, the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights, as well as with national parliaments;
sklene, da bo začasni odbor v roku štirih mesecev po pričetku delovanja parlamentu predstavil vmesno poročilo z natančnimi predlogi o nadaljevanju svojega dela;
Decides that the temporary committee shall present an interim report to Parliament within four months after it has started its work, with detailed proposals on how it will continue its work;
sklene, da bo odbor štel 46 poslancev Evropskega parlamenta.
Decides that the temporary committee shall be composed of 46 Members of the European Parliament.
ki ga vlagajo Frank Vanhecke, Philip Claeys in Koenraad Dillen
by Frank Vanhecke, Philip Claeys and Koenraad Dillen
o konkordatu med Republiko Slovaško in Vatikanom
on the concordat between the Slovak Republic and the Vatican
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o konkordatu med Republiko Slovaško in Vatikanom
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the concordat between the Slovak Republic and the Vatican
ker konkordat med Republiko Slovaško in Vatikanom pomeni, da bo imelo zdravniško osebje v bolnišnicah pravico, da na podlagi ugovora vesti odkloni sodelovanje pri opravljanju splava, umetni oploditvi, poskusih na človeških zarodkih in človeških celicah, evtanaziji, kloniranju, sterilizaciji ali kontracepciji,
whereas the concordat between the Slovak Republic and the Vatican means that medical staff in hospitals will have the right to refuse to participate in performing abortions, artificial fertilisation, experiments on human embryos and human cells, euthanasia, cloning, sterilisation or contraception, on grounds of conscience,
ker je evropska mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov za temeljne človekove pravice 15. decembra 2005 objavila mnenje, v katerem je močno kritizirala priznavanje pravice do ugovora vesti pri splavu, evtanaziji, pomoči pri samomoru, poroki istospolnih partnerjev ali parov, v katerih je en partner transseksualen, ter celo zaključila, da Republika Slovaška s tem konkordatom krši obveznosti do EU na področju človekovih pravic,
whereas on 15 December 2005 the EU Network of Independent Experts in Fundamental Human Rights published an opinion in which it severely criticised recognition of the right to invoke grounds of conscience in cases of abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, the marriage of same-sex couples or a couple where one person is a transsexual, and even concluded that through this agreement the Slovak Republic is violating its EU obligations in the human rights sphere,
poudarja, da osebno in družinsko pravo nista del pravnega reda Evropskih skupnosti, ampak sta ravno nasprotno v izključni pristojnosti držav članic, ki imajo s tem tudi avtonomno pristojnost, da o teh zadevah sprejemajo mednarodne pogodbe;
Points out that the law of persons and family law are not part of the Community acquis but, on the contrary, fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of Member States, which therefore have full authority to conclude international agreements on such matters;
poziva institucije Evropske unije, da spoštujejo nacionalno identiteto Republike Slovaške, kot je določena v Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, ter načelo subsidiarnosti nasploh.
Urges the European institutions to respect both the national identity of the Slovak Republic, as laid down in the Treaty on European Union, and the principle of subsidiarity in general.