natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah, vseh konvencij Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah ter njihovih izbirnih protokolov, Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah in njegovih dveh izbirnih protokolov, Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, zlasti členov 1 in 25 ter členov 39 in 41 iz poglavja VII,
having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to all United Nations human rights conventions and the optional protocols thereto, to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the two optional protocols thereto, to the UN Charter and specifically Articles 1 and 25 and, in Chapter VII, Articles 39 and 41 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah) ter njenih protokolov in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti naslova VI (sodno varstvo), ki je pričela veljati 1. decembra 2009,
having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European Convention on Human Rights) and the protocols thereto, and to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter), in particular the Charter's Title VI, Justice, which entered into force on 1 December 2009,
ob upoštevanju ustreznih določb Lizbonske pogodbe, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji (PEU) in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti (PES), ter zlasti členov 75, 215 in 275 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in določb o demokratičnih načelih, ki so zapisana v naslovu II PEU,
having regard to the relevant provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon, which amends the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty establishing the European Community (TEC), and in particular to Articles 75, 215 and 275 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and to the provisions on democratic principles enshrined in Title II of the TEU,
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih ustreznih določb PEU (členov 3, 6, 11, 13, 19, 21, 29 in 39) in PES (členov 60, 133, 296, 297, 301 in 308),
having regard to the previous relevant provisions of the TEU (Articles 3, 6, 11, 13, 19, 21, 29 and 39) and of the TEC (Articles 60, 133, 296, 297, 301 and 308),
ob upoštevanju ustreznih aktov Sveta s tega področja Sporočilo delovne skupine svetovalcev za zunanje zadeve z dne 22. januarja 2004 z naslovom "Spremljanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike – ustanovitev sestave za sankcije znotraj delovne skupine svetovalcev za zunanje zadeve (Relex/sankcije)" (05603/2004); sporočilo sekretariata z dne 7. junija 2004 z naslovom "Temeljna načela pri uporabi omejevalni ukrepov (sankcij)" (10198/1/2004); sporočilo sekretariata z dne 2. decembra 2005 z naslovom "Smernice za izvajanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU" (15114/2005); sporočilo sekretariata z dne 9. julija 2007 z naslovom "Omejevalni ukrepi – najboljše prakse EU za učinkovito izvajanje omejevalnih ukrepov" (11679/2007) in sporočilo delovne skupine članov Sveta za zunanje zadeve z dne 24. aprila 2008 z naslovom "Omejevalni ukrepi (sankcije) – posodobitev najboljših praks EU" (08666/1/2008).
having regard to relevant Council documents in the area Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party note of 22 January 2004 entitled "Monitoring and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of CFSP – Establishment of a "Sanctions" formation of the Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party (RELEX/Sanctions)" (05603/2004); Secretariat note of 7 June 2004 entitled "Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)" (10198/1/2004); Secretariat note of 2 December 2005 entitled "Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy" (15114/2005); Secretariat note of 9 July 2007 entitled "Restrictive measures/ – EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures" (11679/2007) and Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party note of 24 April 2008 entitled "Restrictive measures (Sanctions) – Update of the "EU Best Practices" (08666/1/2008).
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta 2002/402/SZVP z dne 27. maja 2002 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti Osami bin Ladnu, članom organizacije Al Kajda in talibanom ter drugim osebam, skupinam, podjetjem in entitetam, povezanim z njimi UL L 139, 29.5.2002, str.
having regard to Council Common Position 2002/402/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Usama bin Laden, members of the Al-Qaida organisation and the Taliban and other individuals, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 881/2002 z dne 27. maja 2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z Osama bin Ladnom, mrežo Al Kajda in talibani UL L 139, 29.5.2002, str.
, and Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča 2009/138/SZVP z dne 16. februarja 2009 o omejitvenih ukrepih proti Somaliji UL L 46, 17.2.2009, str.
having regard to Common Position 2009/138/CFSP of 16 February 2009 concerning restrictive measures against Somalia OJ L 46, 17.2.2009, p.
, ustreznega predloga Komisije KOM(2009)0393 .
, to the relevant Commission proposal COM(2009)0393 .
, ter ustreznega predloga Komisije KOM(2009)0395 .
, and to the relevant Commission proposal COM(2009)0395 .
ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za pravne zadeve in človekove pravice pri parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope z dne 16. novembra 2007 z naslovom "Črni seznami varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov in Evropske unije" in dopolnila k temu poročilu z dne 22. januarja 2008,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 16 November 2007 entitled "United Nations Security Council and European Union blacklists" and to the addendum to that report of 22 January 2008,
ob upoštevanju ustrezne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti sodbe z dne 3. septembra 2008 v združenih zadevah C-402/05 P in C-415/05 P,
having regard to the relevant case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and in particular its judgment of 3 September 2008 in Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P,
ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 28 julija 2009 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 881/2002 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte, povezane z Osamo bin Ladnom, mrežo Al Kajda in talibani,
having regard to the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) of 28 July 2009 on the proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban,
ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Odbora za razvoj predsedniku Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 12. novembra 2009,
having regard to the letter of 12 November 2009 from the Chair of its Committee on Development to the Chair of its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj Komisiji in Svetu o omejevalnih ukrepih z dne 16. novembra 2009 ( O-0135/2009 – B7-0233/2009 , O-0136/2009 – B7-0234/2009 ),
having regard to the questions of 16 November 2009 to the Commission and to the Council on restrictive measures ( O-0135/2009 – B7-0233/2009 , O-0136/2009 – B7-0234/2009 ),
ob upoštevanju stališča, ki ga je na svoji seji 3. decembra 2009 Odbor za pravne zadeve izrazil glede pravne podlage v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo za predloge o besedilih o Osami bin Ladnu, mreži Al Kajda in talibanih ter Zimbabveju in Somaliji,
having regard to the views expressed by its Committee on Legal Affairs at its meeting on 3 December 2009 on the legal bases for the proposals concerning the texts on Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, Somalia and Zimbabwe under the Treaty of Lisbon,
ker je spoštovanje človekovih pravic ena temeljnih vrednot Unije (člen 2 PEU), kar se odraža tudi v njenem zunanjem delovanju, saj v skladu s členom 21(1) PEU "Unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni vodijo načela, ki so bila podlaga njenega nastanka, razvoja in širitve in ki jih želi s svojim delovanjem tudi spodbujati v svetu: demokracija, pravna država, univerzalnost in nedeljivost človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, enakost in solidarnost ter spoštovanje načel Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov in mednarodnega prava",
whereas respect for human rights is one of the founding values of the Union (Article 2 TEU) which is also reflected in its external action, Article 21(1) TEU stipulating that its "action on the international scene shall be guided by the principles which have inspired its own creation, development and enlargement, and which it seeks to advance in the wider world: democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law",
ker je Evropska unija zavezana boju proti terorizmu v vseh njegovih razsežnostih, najsi izvira ali deluje znotraj ali zunaj njenih meja, pri čemer Unija z različnimi instrumenti in sredstvi deluje v mejah, ki so opredeljene z vladavino prava in spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic; ker si je treba še posebej prizadevati, da bo zagotovljeno, da se na tem področju temeljne pravice v celoti spoštujejo in da so vsi ukrepi, sprejeti za boj proti terorizmu, sorazmerni, primerni in učinkoviti,
whereas the Union is committed to the fight against terrorism in all its dimensions – whether its origin lies, or its activities occur, inside or beyond EU borders – while acting, through different instruments and means within the clear limits defined by the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights; whereas extreme care must be taken to ensure that in this particular field fundamental rights are fully respected and that all the measures adopted with a view to the fight against terrorism are proportionate, appropriate and effective,
ker sredstva, s katerimi želi Unija doseči zgoraj navedene cilje, med njimi boj proti terorizmu, vključujejo omejevalne ukrepe (sankcije) (čeprav se ne omejujejo le nanje) proti pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom; ker se še naprej porajajo vprašanja, ali so Združeni narodi in EU v zadostni meri dokazali, da se s temi ukrepi uspešno omejuje financiranje terorističnih dejanj, ter ob upoštevanju dejstva, da imajo ti ukrepi velik vpliv na verodostojnost EU in Združenih narodov ter njuni zavezanosti temeljnim pravicam,
whereas the means by which the Union aims to achieve the objectives highlighted above, among them the fight against terrorism, include (but are not limited to) restrictive measures (sanctions) against the governments of third States, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities; whereas questions are still being asked as to what extent the UN and the EU have produced sufficient evidence of the success of these regimes in restricting the financing of acts of terrorism, bearing in mind the significant impact which these regimes have had on the credibility of the EU's and UN's commitment to fundamental rights,
ker se v skladu s splošno prakso EU tukaj brez razlikovanja uporabljata izraza "sankcije" in "omejevalni ukrepi" Vrste omejevalnih ukrepov se razlikujejo in vključujejo embargo na orožje, trgovinske sankcije, finančne/gospodarske sankcije, zamrznitev sredstev, prepoved poletov, omejevanje vstopa, diplomatske sankcije, bojkotiranje športnih in kulturnih dogodkov ter prekinitev sodelovanja s tretjo državo.
whereas, in line with general EU practice, no distinction is being made here between the terms "sanctions" and "restrictive measures" The types of restrictive measures vary and include arms embargoes, trade sanctions, financial/economic sanctions, freezing of assets, flight bans, restriction on admission, diplomatic sanctions, boycotts of sports and cultural events, and suspension of cooperation with a third country.
ker člen 215(2) PDEU določa, da "kadar sklep, sprejet v skladu s poglavjem 2 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, tako predvideva, lahko Svet po postopku iz odstavka 1 sprejme omejevalne ukrepe proti fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom"; in ker prvi odstavek člena 75 PDEU določa, da "če je to potrebno za doseganje ciljev iz člena 67, zlasti kar zadeva preprečevanje terorizma in z njim povezanih dejavnosti ter boj proti njim, Evropski parlament in Svet z uredbami, sprejetimi po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, določita okvir upravnih ukrepov glede pretoka kapitala in plačil, kot so zamrznitev sredstev, finančnega premoženja ali ekonomskih dobičkov, ki pripadajo fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, skupinam ali nedržavnim subjektom ali so v njihovi posesti ali imetništvu",
whereas Article 215(2) TFEU provides that 'where a decision adopted in accordance with Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union so provides, the Council may adopt restrictive measures under the procedure referred to in paragraph 1 against natural or legal persons and groups or non-State entities'; and whereas Article 75, first paragraph, TFEU provides that 'where necessary to achieve the objectives set out in Article 67, as regards preventing and combating terrorism and related activities, the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall define a framework for administrative measures with regard to capital movements and payments, such as the freezing of funds, financial assets or economic gains belonging to, or owned or held by, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities',
ker drugi pododstavek člena 275 PDEU določa tudi, da "je Sodišče pristojno [...] za odločanje o tožbah, vloženih v skladu s pogoji četrtega pododstavka člena 263 te pogodbe, v katerih se nadzira zakonitost sklepov, ki predvidevajo omejevalne ukrepe proti fizičnim ali pravnim osebam, ki jih je Svet sprejel na podlagi poglavja 2 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji",
whereas Article 275, second subparagraph, TFEU also prescribes that 'the Court shall have jurisdiction [...] to rule on proceedings, brought in accordance with the conditions laid down in the fourth paragraph of Article 263 of this Treaty, reviewing the legality of decisions providing for restrictive measures against natural or legal persons adopted by the Council on the basis of Chapter 2 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union',
ker sta v členu 16(2) PDEU Evropski parlament in Svet pozvana, da vzpostavita jasen in stabilen okvir za varstvo osebnih podatkov s pravili "o varstvu fizičnih oseb pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije ter držav članic v okviru dejavnosti s področja uporabe prava Unije in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov"; ker isti člen določa, da "upoštevanje teh pravil nadzirajo neodvisni organi"; ker se razume, da bi omenjena pravila veljala tudi pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov s strani institucij Unije na področju skupne zunanje in varnostne politike; ker je treba člen 39 PEU (v poglavju 2 z naslovom Posebne določbe o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki) razumeti kot odstopanje od člena 16 PDEU, ki določa, da "Svet sprejme sklep o določitvi pravil o varstvu fizičnih oseb, ko države članice obdelujejo osebne podatke pri opravljanju dejavnosti s področja uporabe tega poglavja, in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov"; ker enako kot člen 16(2) PDEU določa, da "upoštevanje teh pravil nadzirajo neodvisni organi",
whereas Article 16(2) TFEU calls on Parliament and the Council to establish a clear and stable framework for data protection with rules 'relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of Union law, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data'; whereas the same Article states that 'compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities'; whereas the implication is that the above-mentioned rules would apply also to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions in the area of the common foreign and security policy; whereas Article 39 TEU (in Chapter 2 which is entitled 'Specific provisions on the common foreign and security policy') must be read as a derogation from Article 16 TFEU which requires that the 'Council shall adopt a decision laying down the rules relating to the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Member States when carrying out activities which fall within the scope of this Chapter, and the rules relating to the free movement of such data'; whereas, in the same way as Article 16(2) TFEU, it prescribes that 'compliance with these rules shall be subject to the control of independent authorities',
ker je v omenjeni zadevi
whereas in the above-mentioned Case
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razveljavilo Uredbo (ES) št. 881/2002, kar zadeva Jasina Abdulaha Kadija in družbo Al Barakaat International Foundation, in je izrazilo mnenje, da mora organ Skupnosti, ki odloči o zamrznitvi sredstev in ekonomskih virov posameznika ali subjekta v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 881/2002, posamezniku ali subjektu, ki ga ukrep zadeva, sporočiti, na kateri podlagi temelji odločitev, da se na ta način spoštuje pravica do obrambe, zlasti pravica do zaslišanja in pravica do sodnega pregleda odločitve; glede na to, da te osebe ali subjekti niso bili obveščeni o dokazih, ki so bili zbrani proti njim, niso mogli v zadovoljivih pogojih braniti svojih pravic pred sodstvom Skupnosti,
, the Court of Justice annulled Regulation (EC) No 881/2002, in so far as it concerned Mr Yassin Abdullah Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation, and considered that the Community authority deciding to freeze the funds and economic resources of an individual or entity in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 must communicate the grounds on which that decision is based to the individual or entity concerned, in order to observe the rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and the right to judicial review, and that, given that those persons or entities were not informed of the evidence adduced against them, they had also been unable to defend their rights with regard to that evidence in satisfactory conditions before the Community judicature,
ker sodna praksa Sodišča prve stopnje Evropskih skupnosti poudarja, da je sodni pregled odločitev toliko pomembnejši, saj je edino procesno jamstvo za ravnovesje med potrebo po boju proti mednarodnemu terorizmu in varstvom temeljnih pravic Zadeva T-228/02,
whereas the case-law of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities emphasises that judicial review is all the more imperative because it constitutes the only procedural safeguard ensuring that a fair balance is struck between the need to fight international terrorism and the protection of fundamental rights Case T-228/02,
Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran proti Svetu,
Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran
II-4665, odstavek 155.
[2006] ECR II-4665, paragraph 155.
; ker so prejšnje sodbe Sodišča prve stopnje (združene zadeve T-110/03, T-150/03 in T-405/03,
; whereas earlier rulings of the Court of First Instance (Joined Cases T-110/03, T-150/03 and T-405/03
) potrdile tri zaporedne odločitve Sveta o tem, da se odvetnikom Joseja Marie Sisona ne dovoli dostop do listin, na podlagi katerih se je Svet odločil, da ga uvrsti na seznam oseb, ki so tarča posebnih omejevalnih ukrepov v skladu s členom 2(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 2580/2001,
) upheld three successive Council decisions to deny lawyers for Jose Maria Sison access to the documents underlying the Council's decision to include him on the list of persons subject to specific restrictive measures under Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001,
ker je resolucija varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov S/RES/1822 (2008) prinesla nekatere izboljšave, in sicer: zahtevo, da se obrazložitev v zvezi s podlago za uvrstitev osebe na seznam objavi na spletni strani odbora za sankcije; obveznost držav članic, da v skladu z domačo zakonodajo in prakso sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da se osebo ali subjekt, ki je uvrščen na seznam, o tem pravočasno obvesti, obvestilu pa se priloži kopija izvlečka iz izreka v tej zadevi, ki je dostopen javnosti, in druge pomembne informacije; vzpostavitev središča, na katerem se lahko osebe, ki so uvrščene na črni seznam, pritožijo Preprosto nekakšna "klirinška hiša" za pritožbe.
whereas UN Security Council Resolution S/RES/1822 (2008) has brought some improvements, namely: the requirement that the statements of reasons concerning the grounds for listing a person be published on the Sanctions Committee website; the obligation of Member States to take, in accordance with their domestic laws and practices, all possible measures to notify or inform in a timely manner the listed individual or entity of the designation and to include with that notification a copy of the publicly releasable portion of the case statement and other relevant information; the creation of a "focal point" to which blacklisted people can direct complaints Simply a "clearing house" for complaints.
ker še vedno ni mednarodnega pravnega mehanizma za nadzor/pregledovanje točnosti podatkov, ki so podlaga za uvrščanje na črni seznam s strani odbora Združenih narodov za sankcije, ali potrebe po sprejetih ukrepih in njihove sorazmernosti; ker posamezniki še vedno nimajo pravice do sodnega varstva ali varstva kvazisodnega organa na ravni Združenih narodov Cameron, str.
whereas there is still no international legal mechanism for checking/reviewing the accuracy of the information forming the basis of a UN Sanctions Committee blacklisting, or the necessity for, and proportionality of, the measures adopted; whereas the individual still has no right of access to a court or a quasi-judicial body at UN level Ibid Cameron, p.
Nujnost doslednega in jasnega pristopa ter ustrezne udeležbe Parlamenta
Need for a coherent and clear approach and proper involvement of Parliament
meni, da je na specifičnem področju protiterorističnih sankcij težko v praksi upravičiti razlikovanje med "notranjo" in "zunanjo" nevarnostjo, še zlasti ko bi te sankcije lahko kršile tudi pravice državljanov EU in oseb, ki stalno prebivajo v EU, v skladu z Listino Cameron, str.
Takes the view that, in the specific area of anti-terrorism sanctions, the distinction between 'external' and 'internal' threats is difficult to justify in practice, especially when such sanctions could also infringe the rights of EU citizens and residents under the Charter Ibid Cameron, p.