natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
16. meni, da se v panogi iger na srečo ne more uporabljati načelo vzajemnega priznavanja licenc, kljub temu pa v skladu z načeli notranjega trga vztraja, da morajo države članice, ki odprejo panogo spletnih iger na srečo za konkurenco za vse ali nekatere vrste spletnih iger na srečo, zagotoviti preglednost in omogočiti nediskriminativno konkurenco; v zvezi s tem priporoča državam članicam, da uvedejo model licenciranja, v skladu s katerim bo lahko zaprosil za licenco vsak evropski ponudnik iger na srečo, ki izpolnjuje pogoje, ki so jih določile države članice; v tistih državah članicah, ki so uvedle sistem licenciranja, bi lahko vzpostavili postopke za vložitev zahtevka za licenco, ki zmanjšujejo upravne obremenitve, da bi se izognili nepotrebnemu podvajanju zahtev in kontrol, ki se izvajajo v drugih državah članicah, pri tem pa zagotovili ključno vlogo regulativnega organa v državi članici, v kateri je bila zahteva vložena; zato meni, da je treba na podlagi tesnejšega upravnega sodelovanja okrepiti medsebojno zaupanje med nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi; poleg tega spoštuje odločitev nekaterih držav članic, da določijo število ponudnikov, vrste in obseg ponujenih iger, da bi zaščitile potrošnike in preprečile kazniva dejanja, pod pogojem da so te omejitve sorazmerne in upoštevajo skrb za omejitev dejavnosti v tej panogi na dosleden in sistematičen način;
Is of the opinion that the principle of mutual recognition of licences in the gambling sector does not apply, but nevertheless, in keeping with internal market principles, insists, that Member States which open up the online gambling sector to competition for all or certain types of online gambling must ensure transparency and make non-discriminatory competition possible; suggests, in this instance, that Member States introduce a licensing model which makes it possible for European gambling providers meeting the conditions imposed by the host Member State to apply for a licence; licence application procedures, which reduce administrative burdens by avoiding the unnecessary duplication of requirements and controls carried out in other Member States, could be set up in those Member States that have implemented a licensing system, while ensuring the pre-eminent role of the regulator in the Member State in which the application has been submitted; takes the view, therefore, that mutual confidence among national regulators needs to be enhanced through closer administrative cooperation; respects, furthermore, the decision of some Member States to determine the number of operators, types and quantities of games on offer, in order to protect consumers and prevent crime, on condition that those restrictions are proportionate and reflect a concern to limit activities in that sector in a consistent and systematic manner;
18. meni, da mora vseevropski kodeks ravnanja na področju spletnih iger na srečo obravnavati pravice in obveznosti ponudnika storitve in potrošnika; meni, da bi moral ta kodeks spodbujati odgovorno igranje na srečo, zagotavljati visoko raven varstva igralcev, zlasti mladoletnih in drugih ranljivih oseb, podpirati mehanizme za boj proti kibernetskemu kriminalu, goljufijam in zavajajočemu oglaševanju na ravni EU ter na nacionalni ravni in določiti okvir načel in pravil za enako varstvo potrošnikov povsod v EU;
Takes the view that a pan-European code of conduct for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer; considers that this code of conduct should help to ensure responsible gaming, a high level of protection for players, particularly in the case of minors and other vulnerable persons, support mechanisms both at EU and national level that fight cyber crime, fraud and misleading advertisement and ultimately provide a framework of principles and rules which ensures that consumers are protected evenly across the EU;
Sodelovanje med regulativnimi organi
Cooperation among regulatory bodies
25. poudarja zlasti, da so potrebni za stave na razliko – vrste igre na srečo, ki se izvaja predvsem prek spleta in v kateri lahko potrošniki izgubijo veliko več od svoje začetne stave – zelo strogi pogoji za dostop potrošnikov in bi jih bilo treba pravno urejati na način, podoben izvedenim finančnim instrumentom, kar v številnih državah članicah že velja;
Points out in particular that spread betting – a form of gambling which is conducted primarily online and in which consumers may potentially lose many times more than their initial stake – necessitates very strict conditions governing consumer access and should be regulated, as is already the case in a number of Member States, in a similar way to financial derivatives;
32. poudarja, da je zasvojenost z igrami na srečo vedenjska motnja, ki lahko v nekaterih državah zadeva do 2 % prebivalstva; zato poziva k študiji o stopnji zasvojenosti v posameznih državah članicah EU, ki bi bila podlaga za opredelitev povezane strategije za varstvo potrošnikov pred tovrstno zasvojenostjo; meni, da je treba takoj, ko se ustvari račun za igre na srečo, dati na voljo obsežne in natančne informacije v zvezi z igrami na srečo, odgovornim igranjem na srečo ter možnostmi za zdravljenje odvisnosti od iger na srečo;
Stresses that compulsive gambling is in fact a behavioural disorder which may affect up to 2% of the population in some countries; calls, therefore, for a survey of the extent of the problem in each EU Member State as a basis for an integrated strategy designed to protect consumers from this form of addiction; takes the view that as soon as a gambling account is created, comprehensive and accurate information must be made available with regard to gambling games, responsible gambling and opportunities for treatment of dependence on gambling;
Študija o čezmejnem alternativnem reševanju sporov v Evropski uniji, 2011,
Study on "Cross-Border Alternative Dispute Resolution in the European Union", 2011,
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?language=en&file=41671 . panoga iger na sreči tista, v kateri je mogoče najpogosteje občutiti posledice odsotnosti sistema alternativnega reševanja sporov; zato predlaga, naj nacionalni regulativni organi vzpostavijo sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov za panogo spletnih iger na srečo;
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies/download.do?language=en&file=41671 . , the gambling sector was identified as the sector where the lack of an alternative dispute resolution system most frequently makes itself felt; suggests, therefore, that national regulatory agencies could establish alternative dispute resolution systems for the online gambling sector;
36. ugotavlja, da se je nevarnost goljufij na športnih tekmovanjih, ki sicer obstaja že od začetka, s pojavom športnih stav na spletu še povečala in ogroža celovitost športa; zato meni, da bi bilo treba oblikovati skupno opredelitev goljufij in prevar v športu in v vsej Evropi kaznovati goljufije pri stavah kot kaznivo dejanje;
Notes that the risk of fraud in sports competitions – although present since the outset – has been exacerbated since the emergence of the online sports betting sector and represents a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the opinion that a common definition of sport fraud and cheating should be developed and that betting fraud should be penalised as a criminal offence throughout Europe;
40. poudarja, da je več evropskih držav že sprejelo strogo zakonodajo za preprečevanje pranja denarja v športnih stavah, goljufij v športu (ki so opredeljene kot posebno kaznivo dejanje) ter navzkrižij interesov med ponudniki stav in športnimi klubi, ekipami ali aktivnimi športniki;
Notes that several European countries have already adopted strict legislation against money laundering through sport betting, sport fraud (classifying it as a specific and criminal offence) and conflicts of interests between betting operators and sport clubs, teams or active athletes;
46. poudarja, da bi sklenitev pravno zavezujočih sporazumov med organizatorji športnih tekmovanj in ponudniki spletnih iger na srečo zagotovila bolj uravnoteženo razmerje med njimi;
Stresses that the conclusion of legally binding agreements between organisers of sports competitions and online gambling operators would ensure a more balanced relationship between them.
Panoga spletnih iger na srečo je v stalnem porastu.
The online gambling sector is growing constantly.
Po najnovejših podatkih se danes približno 10 % vseh iger na srečo v Evropi igra prek spleta ali podobnih kanalov, kot so na primer mobilni telefoni ali interaktivne televizijske platforme, ta delež pa še raste in ima tržni obseg, ki presega 10 milijard EUR.
Nowadays, according to current figures, about 10% - a figure which is rising - of all gambling in Europe takes place on the Internet or via comparable distribution channels such as mobile ‘phones or interactive television platforms, with a market volume in excess of EUR 10 billion.
Za trg običajnih iger na srečo v fizičnem prostoru in spletnih iger na srečo je značilen velik razpon proizvodov: klasične loterije, pa tudi športne stave, poker, tombola in vzajemne stave (totalizator) na konjske in pasje dirke.
The market for physical, location-based gambling and the online gambling sector are characterised by a wide range of products: traditional lotteries, but also sports betting, poker, bingo, and totalisator betting on horse and greyhound races.
Splet je že po naravi medij, ki sega čez meje: te zato ne zaustavijo spletnih iger na srečo.
By its very nature, the Internet is a cross-border medium. online gambling therefore does not stop at borders.
Zaradi čedalje večje ponudbe in rastočega števila igralcev je tudi v Evropi sedanja razdrobljenost trga na tem področju čedalje bolj očitna.
As a result of ever increasing offerings and the increasing number of gamblers, the current market fragmentation in this area in Europe is also becoming ever more obvious.
V številnih državah članicah veljajo popolne prepovedi ali prepovedi s pridržkom dovoljenja, nekatere druge pa imajo popolnoma odprt in liberaliziran trg.
In a host of Member States, there are total bans or bans with the possibility of authorisation, while others have a completely open and liberalised market.
Kakor je ugotovilo Sodišče v številnih sodbah, igre na srečo niso običajne storitve.
As the European Court of Justice has established in many judgments, gambling is not a normal service.
Zato so bile izrecno izvzete iz direktive o storitvah, čeprav svoboda opravljanja storitev v skladu s členom 56 PDEU samoumevno velja tudi za igre na srečo.
Accordingly, it was expressly exempted from the Services Directive, though it goes without saying that freedom to provide services, under Article 56 TFEU, also applies to gambling.
Države članice lahko, med drugim na podlagi členov 51 in 52 PDEU, same v veliki meri pravno urejajo svoj trg, dokler je njihova ureditev skladna z zastavljenimi cilji, na primer z bojem proti zasvojenosti z igrami na srečo.
Inter alia on the basis of Articles 51 and 52 TFEU, Member States may largely regulate their markets themselves, provided that the regulatory arrangements are consistent with objectives being pursued, e.g. combating gambling addiction.
Zaradi različnih običajev ima načelo subsidiarnosti še zlasti močno vlogo na tem področju.
Because of the very great differences in traditions, however, the subsidiarity principle plays a particularly powerful role in this area.
Ponudniki iger na srečo v državah članicah z odprtimi trgi in nizkimi davčnimi stopnjami so dostopni tudi v državah, v katerih so spletne igre na srečo prepovedane, ali pa tekmujejo z licenciranimi spletnimi ponudniki.
Gambling service providers from Member States with open markets and low tax rates are accessible in countries in which online gambling is banned, too, or are in competition with licensed online providers.
Ti ponudniki in ponudniki običajnih iger na srečo v fizičnem prostoru iz teh držav praktično ne morejo biti konkurenčni.
It is virtually impossible for those providers, and for providers of physical, location-based gambling services from those countries, to compete.
Poleg tega na spletu deluje obsežen neurejen črni trg.
Furthermore, there is a large unregulated black market on the Internet.
Prav zato mora biti osrednji cilj močna omejitev tega črnega (in sivega) trga.
The central objective must therefore be to contain that black (and grey) market to a large extent.
Ena od možnosti, da bi države članice uresničile ta cilj, bi bila absolutna prepoved, ki pa bi jo bilo seveda nato treba strogo uveljavljati.
One option for the Member States to realise that objective would be to impose a total ban, which, however, would then have to be strictly enforced.
Na podlagi načela subsidiarnosti se lahko države članice odločijo za to možnost.
The subsidiarity principle makes it possible for Member States to decide on that option.
Glede na to bi bilo treba trg odpreti in dovolj spodbuditi podjetja, da ponudijo zakonito ponudbo.
Accordingly, the market should be opened up and sufficient incentives should be created for firms to provide legal offerings.
Najboljši pristop za dosego navedenega je model licenciranja, če seveda temelji na načelu nediskriminativne konkurence.
To do this, a licensing model is the best approach, provided that it is based on the principle of non-discriminatory competition.
Pri takšnem sistemu, ki je že bil uspešno uveden v nekaterih državah članicah, na primer v Franciji in Italiji, nacionalni regulativni organi določajo pogoje za podelitev licenc.
In such a system, which has already been successfully introduced in some Member States, such as France and Italy, national regulatory bodies lay down the conditions for licences to be granted.
V Franciji, na primer, se je delež zakonitih ponudnikov močno povečal od uvedbe sistema licenciranja: ponudnikov z licenco je več kot 80 % francoske spletne panoge iger na srečo.
In France, for instance, the proportion of legal providers has sharply increased since the introduction of the licensing system: licensed providers now account for more than 80% of the French online gambling sector.
Pogoj za odprt in urejen trg spletnih iger na srečo je neodvisen in močan nacionalni regulativni organ.
An open and regulated market for online gambling presupposes an independent and powerful national regulatory body.
Ta mora določiti okvirne pogoje za igre na srečo, še posebej pa jih mora biti sposoben tudi uveljaviti.
It must determine, and above all also be able to enforce, the environment for gambling.
Nacionalni regulativni organi morajo imeti tudi potrebne pristojnosti, da lahko kaznujejo kršitelje in ukrepajo proti nezakonitim ponudnikom.
National regulators must therefore be given the necessary powers to penalise infringements and act against illegal providers.
Zaradi čezmejne narave spleta države članice same ne morejo urejati vseh področij spletnih iger na srečo.
Because of the cross-border nature of the Internet, however, Member States alone are not in a position to regulate all areas of online gambling.
Nujno je torej okrepljeno sodelovanje med regulativni organi.
Much-expanded cooperation between national regulatory bodies is therefore essential.
Doslej je šlo le za sodelovanje v manjšem obsegu, npr. prek dvostranskih postopkov.
To date, collaboration has been on a small scale, e.g. through bilateral procedures.
Potrebno pa bi bilo institucionalizirano sodelovanje, morda na podlagi informacijskega sistema za notranji trg, da bi se lahko informacije posredovale učinkovito in hitro.
What is needed, however, are institutionalised collaborative arrangements, e.g. on the basis of the Internal Market Information System, in order to share information efficiently and quickly.
Ena od možnosti je tudi razvito omrežje regulativnih organov, ki bi ga usklajevala Komisija.
An extended, Commission-coordinated network of regulators is also conceivable.
Samo s skupnim evropskim pristopom je mogoče preprečiti, da bi neregulirani ponudniki izkoriščali zakonodajne vrzeli in regulativne organe izigravali drugega proti drugemu.
Only through a common European approach can unregulated providers be prevented from exploiting regulatory gaps and playing national regulatory bodies off against each other.
Zaradi tega morajo Komisija in države članice hitro ukrepati, da potrošnike v Evropi zaščitijo pred ponudniki, nevrednimi zaupanja.
The challenge for the Commission and the Member States is to act quickly, therefore, in order to safeguard consumers in Europe against untrustworthy providers.
Igre na srečo vključujejo tudi nevarnost zasvojenosti.
Gambling involves a risk of addiction.
Raziskave kažejo, da je od uvedbe spletnih iger na srečo pred približno desetimi leti število ljudi, ki poiščejo pomoč v centrih za pomoč za zasvojene z igrami na srečo, močno naraslo.
Studies show that, since online gambling was introduced some 10 years ago, there has been a significant increase in the number of people approaching support centres for gambling addicts.
Obstajajo že številne pobude regulativnih organov ter pobude v obliki kodeksov ravnanja in zavez, ki poskušajo omejiti čezmejno igranje iger na srečo in zasvojenost s spletnimi igrami na srečo.
There are already many initiatives - both by regulatory bodies and in the form of codes of conduct and commitments - attempting to stem Internet problem gambling and gambling addiction.
Vendar je na tem področju težje dosegati cilje, če v vsaki državi članici veljajo različni standardi.
In this connection, however, it is not appropriate that different standards should apply in each Member State.
V številnih državah članicah ter pri državnih in zasebnih ponudnikih spletnih iger na srečo pa je mogoče najti vzorne zaščitne ukrepe.
In many Member States, both public- and private-sector providers of online gambling services operate exemplary safeguards.
Ti pogosto temeljijo samo na nacionalnih standardih in zato niso združljivi z idejo notranjega trga.
In many instances, however, they are based on purely national standards and are therefore not compatible with the notion of the internal market.
Tako se v nekaterih državah članicah za izkazovanje identitete na spletu zahteva elektronska osebna izkaznica.
In some Member States, for example, an electronic badge is required for identity checks on the Internet.
Tujci takšne izkaznice pogosto nimajo in zato ne morejo igrati spletnih iger na srečo, niti če imajo v tej državi članici stalno prebivališče.
Many foreign nationals do not have such a badge and are therefore debarred from online gambling - even if they are permanent residents in the Member State concerned.
Manjše ovire za vstop na trg so pomemben korak za oblikovanje zakonitega in urejene panoge iger na srečo.
Lower market entry barriers are an important step towards establishing a legal and regulated gambling sector.
Varstvo mladoletnikov pred igrami na srečo je nadaljnji splošni cilj; nanj ne vplivajo različni običaji ali kulture.
Safeguarding minors against gambling is a further universal objective; it is not governed by different traditions or cultures.
Zaradi tega se priporoča, da se določijo vseevropski minimalni standardi za zaščito mladoletnih oseb, boj proti zasvojenosti z igrami na srečo ter za boj proti pranju denarja in drugim kaznivim dejanjem, povezanim z igrami na srečo.
What obviously needs to be done, accordingly, is to lay down pan-European minimum standards for safeguarding minors and for combating gambling addiction, but also for combating money laundering and other crimes associated with gambling.
To bi bilo mogoče doseči v obliki predloga direktive Komisije, ki bi določil minimalne standarde, veljavne v vsej Evropi, ki bi bili obvezni za vse regulirane ponudnike spletnih iger na srečo.
This could be done in a Commission proposal for a directive laying down minimum standards applicable across Europe and binding on all regulated online gambling service providers.
Poleg tega bi lahko države članice prosto določile dodatna merila.
Member States would be free to set further criteria.
Odločno ukrepanje Komisije in držav članic je pomembno za zagotovitev enotne in visoke minimalne ravni varstva potrošnikov v vsej Evropi.
Resolute action by the Commission and the Member States is important in order to ensure, across Europe, a uniform and high minimum level of protection for consumers.
V večini držav članic prihodki iz iger na srečo prispevajo k financiranju dobrodelnih ali javno koristnih dejavnosti in športa.
In most Member States, revenue from gambling is also used for charitable and publicly beneficial purposes and for the funding of sport.
Seveda to velja samo za zakonite in regulirane ponudnike iger na srečo.
However, that only applies in the case of legal and regulated gambling providers.
Nezakoniti ponudniki ne plačujejo davkov in zato tudi družbi ne dajejo nobenega prispevka.
Illegal providers pay no taxes and therefore make no contribution towards society.
Če bi se trgi pravno urejali na ravni držav članic, bi morali ponudniki spletnih iger na srečo večino obračunanega davka od iger na srečo plačati v državi, iz katere je igralec.
If markets were regulated at Member State level, online gambling service providers would have to pay much of the gaming tax levied in the country of the gambler.
To je pomembno, da so lahko javni prihodki od iger na srečo v vsej Evropi na voljo za financiranje športa in za druge javno koristne namene.
That is important for ensuring that government revenue from gambling throughout Europe is available for the funding of sport and for other publicly beneficial purposes.
Na področju stav na konjske dirke je mogoče tako zagotoviti, da rejci dobijo delež prihodkov od stav, ki je potreben za nadaljnje financiranje vzreje.
With regard to horse race betting, for example, this can ensure that breeders receive a proportion of betting revenue so that breeding can continue to be funded.
Na žalost so se v preteklosti vedno znova pojavljali primeri goljufij pri športnih stavah, kar vzbuja dvome o celovitosti športa.
Time and time again in the past, regrettably, there have been cases of betting fraud in sport; that calls the integrity of sport into question.
V neposrednem interesu vseh zainteresiranih strani, tj. športnih zvez, navijačev, ponudnikov iger na srečo in igralcev, je, da zagotovijo celovitost športa in preprečijo goljufije pri stavah.
It is in the direct interest of all stakeholders, i.e. sports associations, fans, gambling service providers and players, to safeguard the integrity of sport and prevent betting fraud.
Proti tem se je mogoče najbolje boriti na evropski ravni.
Betting fraud can best be combated at European level.
Evropska komisija bi morala zato skupaj z državami članicami razviti sistem, ki bi učinkovito zatrl goljufije pri stavah.
The Commission should therefore develop a system, together with the Member States, which effectively combats betting fraud.
Skupno ukrepanje proti goljufijam pri stavah bi bilo tudi bolj učinkovito proti neevropskim kriminalnim združbam, ki se ukvarjajo z goljufijami.
Common action against betting fraud will also produce a greater impact vis-à-vis non-European criminal betting fraudsters.
Za zagotovitev celovitosti športa se je treba izogibati navzkrižju interesov med ponudniki športnih stav in športnimi združenji.
In the interests of the integrity of sport, conflicts of interest between sports betting providers and sports clubs must be avoided.
Vendar pa oglaševanje športnih iger ali sponzoriranje športnega združenja sama po sebi še ne pomenita navzkrižja interesov.
Advertising for gambling or sponsoring a sports club does not yet, in itself, constitute a conflict of interests, however.