natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. opozarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije potrdilo, da pomenijo čezmejne igre na srečo, vključno s tistimi, ki se prirejajo prek elektronskih medijev, gospodarsko dejavnost, ki spada na področje uporabe člena 56 PDEU, ki obravnava svobodo opravljanja storitev; potrjuje, da se omejitve svobode opravljanja storitev čezmejnih iger na srečo lahko utemeljijo z odstopanji, omenjenimi v členih 51 in 52 PDEU, ali iz razlogov prevladujočega javnega interesa, kar je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča;
Reiterates that the Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that cross-border gambling services – including those provided electronically – constitute an economic activity which falls under Article 56 TFEU on the freedom to provide services; confirms that restrictions on the freedom to provide cross-border gambling services may be justified on the basis of the grounds for exceptions referred to in Articles 51 and 52 TFEU or for reasons of overriding public interest, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice;
5. poudarja, da je glede na inherentne značilnosti katere koli spletne dejavnosti – še zlasti pa čezmejne narave takih dejavnosti in množitev ponudnikov offshore – potreben usklajen odgovor na evropski ali po potrebi svetovni ravni; poudarja pomen skupne opredelitve na ravni EU za spletne igre na srečo kot izhodišča za vso nadaljnjo zakonodajo;
Stresses that the inherent nature of all online activities, in particular the fact that they operate across national borders and the proliferation of offshore operators, means that they must be dealt with in a coordinated manner at the European or global level, where appropriate; highlights the importance of a common EU-wide definition of online gambling as a starting point for any future legislation;
8. poudarja zlasti, da stave na razliko, tj. oblika igre na srečo, ki se izvaja predvsem prek spleta in v kateri lahko potrošniki izgubijo veliko več od njihove začetne stave, so potrebni zelo strogi pogoji za dostop potrošnikov in bi jih bilo treba regulirati na način, podoben izvedenim finančnim instrumentom, kar v številnih državah članicah že velja;
Points out in particular that spread betting – a form of gambling which is conducted primarily online and in which consumers may potentially lose many times more than their initial stake – necessitates very strict conditions governing consumer access and should be regulated, as is already the case in a number of Member States, in a similar way to financial derivatives;
11. poudarja, da je zasvojenost z igrami na srečo vedenjska motnja, ki lahko v nekaterih državah zadeva do 2 % prebivalstva; zato poziva k študiji o stopnji zasvojenosti v posameznih državah članicah EU, ki bi bila osnova za opredelitev splošne politike zaščite potrošnikov pred tovrstno zasvojenostjo; meni, da je treba takoj, ko se ustvari račun za igre na srečo, dati na voljo obsežne in natančne informacije v zvezi z igrami na srečo, odgovornim igranjem na srečo in možnostmi za zdravljenje odvisnosti od iger na srečo; predlaga, da se igralce na srečo pozove, da si omejijo dnevno in mesečno denarno porabo, ki velja za celotno igralniško storitev;
Stresses that compulsive gambling is in fact a behavioural disorder which may affect up to 2% of the population in some countries; calls, therefore, for a survey of the extent of the problem in each EU Member State as a basis for an integrated strategy designed to protect consumers from this form of addiction; takes the view that as soon as a gambling account is created, comprehensive and accurate information must be made available with regard to gambling games, responsible gambling and opportunities for treatment of dependence on gambling; suggests that gamblers should be invited to set themselves daily and monthly monetary expenditure limits applicable to the whole gambling service;
16. meni, da utegneta razcvet nezakonitega spletnega igranja na srečo in dejstvo, da spletno igranje na srečo ni urejeno na svetovni ravni, ogroziti celovitost športa; poudarja, da je za sektor športa bistveno, da se zavarujeta verodostojnost in poštenost tekmovanj; vztraja, da je to mogoče učinkovito izvesti samo na čezmejni ravni; meni, da mora Evropska unija zato dejavneje sodelovati pri obrambi neokrnjenosti športa, skupaj z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi;
Takes the view that the proliferation of illegal online gambling and the fact that online gambling is not regulated at the global level may represent a threat to the integrity of sport; stresses that keeping sporting events credible and honest is vital to the sports industry as a whole; stresses that this can be done effectively only at transnational level; takes the view that the European Union must therefore play a more prominent role in safeguarding the integrity of sport, alongside all stakeholders;
19. poudarja pomen preglednosti na področju spletnih iger na srečo; opozarja predvsem na obveznost letnega poročanja, s pomočjo katerega bi, med drugim, lahko izvedeli, katere dejavnosti v javnem interesu in kateri športni dogodki se financirajo ali sponzorirajo z dohodki od iger na srečo; poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj preuči možnost obvezne predložitve letnega poročila.
Notes the importance of transparency in the online gambling sector; envisages, in this connection, annual reporting obligations, which should demonstrate, inter alia, what activities of general interest and/or sports events are financed and/or sponsored by means of the proceeds from gambling; calls on the Commission to investigate the possibility of compulsory annual reporting.
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Marianne Thyssen, Corien Wortmann-Kool,
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Sławomir Witold Nitras, Ivari Padar, Alfredo Pallone, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Olle Schmidt, Edward Scicluna, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Ivo Strejček, Marianne Thyssen, Corien Wortmann-Kool,
Sophie Auconie, Pervenche Berès, Herbert Dorfmann, Sari Essayah, Vicky Ford, Ashley Fox, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Andreas Schwab, Teodoros Skilakakis (Teodoros Skilakakis ), Catherine Stihler
Sophie Auconie, Pervenche Berès, Herbert Dorfmann, Sari Essayah, Vicky Ford, Ashley Fox, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Andreas Schwab, Theodoros Skylakakis, Catherine Stihler
o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu
on online gambling in the internal market
2. opozarja, da imajo države članice pravico do regulacije in nadzora svojih trgov iger na srečo v skladu z evropsko zakonodajo s področja notranjega trga ter s svojo tradicijo in kulturo;
Highlights the fact that Member States have the right to regulate and control their gambling markets in accordance with European internal market legislation and with their traditions and culture;
5. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj vzpostavijo učinkovite mehanizme za ozaveščanje o nevarnostih odvisnosti od iger, zlasti med mladimi;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction, targeting young people in particular;
9. poudarja, kako pomembne so nacionalne licence za ponudnike spletnih iger na srečo; meni, da je najprimerneje, da v zvezi s tem ukrepajo države članice, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti;
Underlines the importance of national licenses for online gambling operators; considers that in this regard the Member States are best placed to act, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity;
12. opozarja Komisijo kot varuhinjo pogodb na njeno nalogo, da mora po prejetju pritožb o kršitvi svoboščin, določenih v pogodbah, hitro ukrepati; zato jo poziva, naj nemudoma in brez izjeme obravnava stare in nove primere kršitve;
Reminds the Commission, as ‘guardian of the Treaties’, of its duty to swiftly act upon reception of complaints of violation of the freedoms enshrined in the Treaties; calls on the Commission, therefore, to urgently and systematically pursue existing and new infringement cases;
CWA 16259:2011: Ukrepi za odgovorno igranje iger na srečo na daljavo. , kljub temu pa ponovno potrjuje svoje stališče, da na področju iger na srečo samoregulacija v panogi lahko le dopolnjuje zakonodajo, ne more pa je nadomestiti;
CWA 16259:2011: Responsible Remote Gambling Measures. , but nevertheless reaffirms its position that, in the area of gambling, industry self-regulation can only complement, but not replace, statutory legislation;
16. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi smotrne zakonodajne predloge za zagotovitev zakonodajnega okvira, ki bo ustvaril pravno gotovost za zakonita evropska podjetja in zaščitil potrošnike.
Calls on the Commission to bring forward meaningful legislative proposals to provide a legal framework that will create legal certainty for legitimate European businesses and protect consumers;
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Alexandra Thein, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Alexandra Thein, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Robert Rochefort, Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov
Robert Rochefort, Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................15
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (*) 13
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................21
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................19
o alternativnem reševanju sporov v civilnih, gospodarskih in družinskih zadevah
on alternative dispute resolution in civil, commercial and family matters
– ob upoštevanju člena 3(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter člena 67 in člena 81(2)(g) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 3(2) of the Treaty on European Union, as well as Articles 67 and 81(2)(g) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovalnega dokumenta z naslovom „O alternativnem reševanju sporov kot sredstvu za reševanje sporov pri gospodarskih transakcijah in praksi v Evropski uniji“ z dne 18. januarja 2011 in povzetka prejetih odgovorov, ki je bil objavljen aprila 2011,
– having regard to the Commission’s consultation paper entitled ‘On the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution as a means to resolve disputes related to commercial transactions and practices in the European Union’ of 18 January 2011 and the document entitled ‘Summary of the responses received’ published in April 2011,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovalnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom „Alternativno reševanje sporov na področju finančnih storitev“ z dne 11. decembra 2008 in povzetka odgovorov po javnem posvetovanju o alternativnem reševanju sporov na področju finančnih storitev z dne 14. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the Commission’s consultation document entitled ‘Alternative dispute resolution in the area of financial services’ of 11 December 2008 and the document entitled ‘Summary of the responses to the public consultation on alternative dispute resolution in the area of financial services’ of 14 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige o alternativnem reševanju sporov v civilnem in gospodarskem pravu z dne 19. aprila 2002 ( KOM(2002)0196 ),
– having regard to the Green Paper on alternative dispute resolution in civil and commercial law of 19 April 2002 ( COM(2002)0196 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočil Komisije z dne 30. marca 1998 o načelih, ki se uporabljajo za organe, pristojne za izvensodno reševanje potrošniških sporov
– having regard to the Commission’s recommendations of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes
31. , in z dne 4. aprila 2001 o načelih za izvensodne organe, ki so vključeni v sporazumno reševanje potrošniških sporov
31. and of 4 April 2001 on the principles for out-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of consumer disputes
UL L 109, 19.4.2001, str.
OJ L 109, 19.4.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. aprila 2011 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg – Dvanajst pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja – Skupaj za novo rast“ ( KOM(2011)0206 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 13 April 2011 entitled ‘Single Market Act – Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence ‘Working together to create new growth’ ( COM(2011)0206 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 25. maja 2000 o vseskupnostni mreži za izvensodno reševanje potrošniških sporov
– having regard to the Council Resolution of 25 May 2000 on a Community-wide network of national bodies for the extra-judicial settlement of consumer disputes
– ob upoštevanju memoranduma o soglasju o omrežju čezmejnih izvensodnih pritožb v zvezi s finančnimi storitvami in evropskem gospodarskem prostoru z dne 30. marca 1998 ter omrežju FIN-NET,
– having regard to the Memorandum of Understanding on a Cross-Border Out-of-Court Complaints Network for Financial Services in the European Economic Area of 30 March 1998 and to FIN-NET,
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe Sveta z dne 28. maja 2001 o ustanovitvi evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
– having regard to Council Decision 2001/470/EC of 28 May 2001 establishing a European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters
– ob upoštevanju evropskega kodeksa ravnanja mediatorjev (v nadaljevanju: kodeks ravnanja) iz leta 2004,
– having regard to the European Code of Conduct for Mediators (hereinafter: ‘Code of Conduct’) launched in 2004,
UL L 136, 24.5.2008, str.
OJ L 136, 24.5.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju študije o stroških neobstoja alternativnega reševanja sporov – pregled in predstavitev dejanskih stroškov gospodarskih sporov znotraj Skupnosti z dne 9. junija 2010, ki jo je pripravil center ADR v Rimu, v Italiji,
– having regard to the study entitled ‘The Cost of Non ADR – Surveying and Showing the Actual Costs of Intra-Community Commercial Litigation’, dated 9 June 2010, by the ADR Center, Rome, Italy,
– ob upoštevanju ugotovitev testne skupine evropskih podjetij (European business test panel – EBTP) o alternativnem reševanju sporov v obdobju od 17. decembra 2010 do 17. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the findings of the European Business Test Panel (EBTP) on ‘Alternative Dispute Resolution’, covering the period from 17 December 2010 to 17 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2003 o zeleni knjigi Komisije o alternativnem reševanju sporov v civilnem in gospodarskem pravu
– having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2003 on the Commission’s Green Paper on alternative dispute resolution in civil and commercial law
– ob upoštevanju Poročila preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe Equitable Life Assurance Society, sprejetega dne 19. junija 2007
– having regard to its recommendation of 19 June 2007 based on the report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. septembra 2011 o izvajanju direktive o mediaciji v državah članicah, njenih posledicah za mediacijo in njeni uporabi na sodiščih
– having regard to its resolution of 13 September 2011 on the implementation of the directive on mediation in the Member States, its impact on mediation and its take-up by the courts
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0361 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0361 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov (A7 0343/2011),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0343/2011 ),
A. ker je dostop do sodnega varstva temeljna pravica;
A. whereas access to justice is a fundamental right,
B. ker mora območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, kot ga določajo Pogodbe, zadostiti potrebam državljanov in podjetij, na primer s preprostejšimi in jasnejšimi postopki, hkrati pa mora krepiti dostop do sodnega varstva;
B. whereas an area of freedom, security and justice, as laid down in the Treaties, must meet the needs of citizens and businesses, for example by creating simpler and clearer procedures, whilst enhancing access to justice,
C. ker imata sodni postopek in alternativno reševanje sporov tesno povezane cilje in sta namenjena hitri ponovni vzpostavitvi miru med strankami v sporu, ustrezni zaščiti subjektivne materialne pravice in reševanju sporov med strankami;
C. whereas the objectives of the judicial process and of alternative means of dispute settlement are closely linked and seek to swiftly restore legal peace between parties in dispute, suitably safeguard individuals' substantive rights and settle disputes between parties,
D. ker lahko alternativno reševanje sporov, s pomočjo katerega se lahko stranke izognejo običajni sodbi sodišča ponudi hitro in stroškovno učinkovito alternativo postopkom pred sodišči;
D. whereas alternative dispute resolution (ADR), which helps parties avoid traditional adjudicative procedures, is capable of constituting a quick and cost-effective alternative to litigation,
E. ker je alternativno reševanje sporov mehanizem zunajsodnega reševanja, ki potrošniku in trgovcu pomaga rešiti spor preko posredovanja tretje strani (mediator, arbiter);
E. whereas ADR is a mechanism for reaching out-of-court settlements by helping consumers and traders to resolve conflicts through the intervention of a third party (mediator or arbitrator),
F. ker imajo v številnih državah javni organi – vključno z varuhi človekovih pravic in regulativnimi organi – pomembno vlogo pri spodbujanju reševanja sporov;
F. whereas in many countries the public authorities – including ombudsmen and regulatory authorities – play an important role in encouraging the resolution of disputes,
G. ker lahko večje zaupanje državljanov v notranji trg in zaupanje v uveljavljanje pravic v čezmejnih sporih dodatno spodbudi gospodarstvo EU;
G. whereas by strengthening citizens’ confidence in the internal market, trust in the enforcement of rights in cross-border disputes can make a contribution towards stimulating the EU economy,
H. ker državljani EU slabo poznajo in razumejo sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov po Evropi ter samo majhen delež državljanov ve, kako vložiti zahtevek pri organu za alternativno reševanje sporov;
H. whereas the EU citizen’s knowledge and understanding of ADR schemes throughout Europe is low and confused, with only a small percentage of citizens knowing how to file a claim with an ADR body,
I. ker je pomembno, da se zagotovi boljše seznanjanje z obstojem alternativnega reševanja sporov in da se naredi več za spodbujanje potrošnikov in strokovnjakov k uporabi takega reševanja kot alternative za sodne postopke, ki omogoča izognitev soočenju in ponuja možnost rešitve, ugodne za vse udeležene;
I. whereas it is important to assure better publicising of the existence of ADR mechanisms and to do more to encourage consumers and professionals to use them as an alternative to court proceedings, in order to make it possible to avoid a confrontational approach and offer the prospect of a win-win situation,
J. ker si je treba prizadevati za uravnotežen pristop, ki bo upošteval tako prožnost sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov kot potrebo po zagotavljanju varstva potrošnikov in pravičnih postopkov;
J. whereas a balanced approach has to be sought which takes into consideration both the flexibility of ADR systems on the one hand and the need to ensure consumer protection and fair procedures on the other,
K. ker se je Parlament že večkrat zavzel za nadaljnja prizadevanja pri razvoju alternativnega reševanja sporov; ker je v svoji resoluciji z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu pozval Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnih načinov reševanja sporov v EU;
K. whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for further efforts to develop ADR; whereas it has called on the Commission in its resolution of 6 April 2011 on governance and partnership in the single market to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the EU by the end of 2011,
L. ker je Komisija vključila v svoj delovni program za leto 2011 zakonodajni predlog o alternativnem reševanju sporov kot strateško pobudo, v svoje sporočilo z dne 13. aprila 2011 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg“ pa kot eno od dvanajstih pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja s ciljem krepitve moči potrošnika;
L. whereas the Commission has included a legislative proposal on ADR, in its Work Programme 2011 as a strategic initiative and in its communication of 13 April 2011 on a ‘Single Market Act’, as one of the twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence, with the aim of consumer empowerment,
M. ker se je rok za izvedbo Direktive 2008/52/ES iztekel 21. maja 2011;
M. whereas the deadline for the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC expired on 21 May 2011,
Horizontalni pristop k alternativnemu reševanju sporov
Horizontal approach to ADR
7. v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnega reševanja potrošniških sporov v Uniji, in poudarja, da je treba ta predlog hitro sprejeti;
In this context, calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution for consumer matters in the EU by the end of 2011 and emphasises the importance of its swift adoption;
Skupni standardi za alternativno reševanje sporov
Common standards for ADR
Glej http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/consumer/docs/explanatory_note_results_feasibility_study_05_2011_en.pdf. predvidena odložitev zastaralnega roka v primeru postopkov arbitraže in mediacije ter v nekaterih drugih okoliščinah alternativnega reševanja sporov; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z delom na tem področju;
See http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/consumer/docs/explanatory_note_results_feasibility_study_05_2011_en.pdf. provides for a suspension of prescription in the case of arbitration and mediation proceedings, and in certain other ADR situations; calls upon the Commission to continue work on this;