natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
v zvezi z letnim poročilom Računskega sodišča na splošno meni, da bi bilo koristno, če bi Računsko sodišče pripravilo jasnejši oris dejanske škode, ki so jo povzročile morebitne ugotovljene nepravilnosti;
With regard to the Court of Auditors' Annual Report in general, would find it helpful if the Court provided a clearer picture of the actual damage caused by any irregularities which have been identified;
priznava potrebo po vzpostavitvi ravnotežja med zahtevami na področju poročanja in postopkov za nevladne organizacije na eni strani ter dejansko možnostjo za slednje, da redno izpolnjujejo te zahteve, na drugi strani; pozdravil bi razmišljanje Računskega sodišča o tem, kako najbolje uskladiti te interese;
Recognises the need to strike a balance between reporting and procedural requirements for NGOs on the one hand and the feasibility of NGOs meeting these on a regular basis on the other hand, and would welcome reflection by the Court on how these interests could be better reconciled;
sprašuje, če je Komisija skušala primerjati učinkovitost pomoči raznih mednarodnih donatorjev; če tega še ni storila, predlaga, da čim prej opravi to nalogo;
Asks whether the Commission has made attempts to compare the efficiency of various international aid donors; if not, proposes that such an exercise be undertaken as soon as possible;
opozarja, da je Parlament ob različnih priložnostih podprl zamisel o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada za Latinsko Ameriko; ugotavlja, čeprav obstaja občutna podpora v korist takšnega sklada, da bi ga morala spremljati večja socialna prizadevanja s strani političnega in gospodarskega vodstva zadevnih držav; zlasti opozarja na odgovornost, ki jo imajo države s posebno negativnimi rezultati na področju delitve dohodka, da poskušajo popraviti takšen položaj; ugotavlja, da bi Evropska unija morala uresničevati socialne cilje v takšnih državah tako z zagotavljanjem pomoči kot s prepričevanjem zadevnih držav, da si same bolj prizadevajo v tej smeri; meni, da je treba najti zadovoljivo ravnotežje med tema dvema elementoma;
Draws attention to the support given by Parliament on numerous occasions to the idea of having a Solidarity Fund for Latin America; notes that, while there is considerable support for such a fund, it would have to be accompanied by greater social commitment from the political and economic leadership of the countries in question; in particular, draws attention to the responsibility of countries with a particularly bad record of income distribution to seek to rectify this; notes that the EU should pursue social objectives in these countries by both delivering aid and convincing the countries in question to do more themselves, and that a satisfactory balance between these two elements should be found;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija zagotovila (pisno) utemeljitev Parlamentu, vsakokrat ko ne bo izvedla določbe iz proračunske pripombe;
Expects the Commission to provide a (written) explanation to Parliament each time it does not implement a provision set out in a budgetary remark;
meni, da razvojna politika predstavlja ključni element zunanjepolitičnega delovanja Unije: njen cilj je odpraviti revščino, to pa naj bi dosegli s krepitvijo socialne in zdravstvene infrastrukture ter infrastrukture s področja vzgoje in izobraževanja, z večanjem proizvodnih zmogljivosti revnega prebivalstva in zagotavljanjem podpore zadevnim državam pri njihovem pospeševanju domače rasti in razvoju potencialov; poudarja, naj bi uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja predstavljalo pomemben korak k doseganju tega cilja;
Takes the view that development policy is an essential component of the Union's external activities, its aim being to eradicate poverty by reinforcing social infrastructure, education and health, increasing the production capacity of poor population groups and giving support to the countries concerned so that they can develop growth and local potential; stresses that the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) would be a major step towards reaching this objective;
priznava prizadevanja Komisije pri osredotočanju svojih razvojnih ukrepov na uresničevanje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, vključno z opredelitvijo desetih ključnih kazalcev; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja v tej smeri, in priporoča, naj 35 % izdatkov za razvojno sodelovanje Evropske unije posveti uresničitvi razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja;
Recognises the Commission's efforts to focus its development operations on the achievement of the MDGs including the identification of ten key indicators; calls on the Commission to step up its efforts in this direction and recommends devoting 35% of the European Union's development cooperation expenditure to achieving the MDGs;
zaveda se težav v zvezi z merjenjem vpliva pomoči Skupnosti pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja v primeru več darovalcev; obžaluje dejstvo, da si Komisija ni prizadevala za vzpostavitev ustreznega mehanizma za merjenje takšnega vpliva in se je tako omejila na merjenje napredka pri uresničevanju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja v državah v razvoju; obžaluje dejstvo, da so odgovori Komisije na vprašalnik Odbora za razvoj posebej nejasni glede uresničevanja razvojnih ciljev tisočletja v okviru razvojnih ukrepov Komisije;
Recognises the problems of measuring the impact of Community assistance on the achievement of the MDGs in multi-donor environments; deplores the fact that the Commission has not made efforts to establish an appropriate mechanism to measure such impact and thus confines itself to measuring the process of the developing countries towards the MDGs; deplores the fact that the Commission's replies to the Development Committee's questionnaire are particularly vague as regards the implementation of the MDGs in the Commission's development actions;
pozdravlja izboljšave, ki jih je Komisija uvedla v svojem sistemu poročanja, in priznava kakovostno izboljšanje letnega poročila za leto 2004 o razvojni politiki in zunanji pomoči ES (KOM(2004)0536 in SEK(2004)1027);
Welcomes the improvements made by the Commission in its reporting system and recognises the improved quality of the Annual Report 2004 on EC Development Policy and External Assistance ( COM(2004)0536 and SEC(2004)1027 );
sklene uvesti letno plenarno razpravo o letnem poročilu Komisije o razvojni politiki in zunanji pomoči ES;
Decides to introduce an annual plenary debate on the Commission's Annual Report on EC Development Policy and External Assistance;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je delež porabe za socialne infrastrukture in storitve uradne razvojne pomoči, financirane v okviru splošnega proračuna ter Evropskega razvojnega sklada, ki je leta 2003 znašal skupno 8 269 milijonov EUR, povečal od 31,4 % leta 2002 na 34,7 % leta 2003;
Welcomes the fact that the share of spending for social infrastructure and services of the Official Development Assistance (ODA) financed by the general budget and the EDF, which totalled EUR 8 269 million in 2003, increased from 31,4% in 2002 to 34,7% in 2003;
obžaluje kot nesprejemljivo dejstvo, da je bilo samo 198 milijonov EUR (2,4 %) namenjenih osnovnemu izobraževanju in 310 milijonov (3,8 %) osnovnemu zdravstvu; poziva Komisijo, da poveča finančna sredstva za te sektorje in zahteva, da se v državah v razvoju 20 % izdatkov za razvojno sodelovanje Evropske unije nameni za osnovno izobraževanje in zdravstvo;
Deplores as unacceptable the fact that only EUR 198 million (2,4%) was earmarked for basic education and EUR 310 million (3,8%) for basic health; urges the Commission to increase funding for these sectors and calls for 20% of the European Union's development cooperation expenditure to be earmarked for basic education and health in the developing countries;
pozdravlja vlogo Komisije v razpravi o usklajevanju darovalcev in harmonizaciji postopkov; obžaluje pomanjkanje napredka na mednarodni ravni in odpor držav članic; poziva Komisijo, da poveča prizadevanja za preprečevanje podvajanja razvojnih ukrepov in za napredek v smeri komplementarnosti;
Welcomes the role of the Commission in the debate on donor coordination and harmonisation of procedures; deplores the lack of progress on the international level and the reluctance of Member States; urges the Commission to increase efforts to avoid duplications of development actions and to progress towards complementarity;
meni, da je bila podpora Komisije pri pripravi novih držav članic na sodelovanje v razvojni politiki EU nezadostna; poziva Komisijo, da podpre nove države članice in države kandidatke pri oblikovanju njihove razvojne politike ter postopku ozaveščanja v zvezi z razvojnimi vprašanji;
Considers that the Commission's support in preparing the new Members States for their participation in the EU development policy was insufficient; urges the Commission to support the new Member States and candidate countries in the establishment of their development policy and in the process of awareness building for development issues;
izraža pohvalo Komisiji za njeno požrtvovalno pomoč pri programu PHARE, ker je pripravila države kandidatke na upravljanje s strukturnimi skladi;
Commends the Commission for the efforts it has made so far through the PHARE programme in helping to prepare the candidate countries for managing the structural funds;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker Komisija ni zagotovila, da bi bil pred pristopom dokončan postopek pridobitve dovoljenj za številne agencije, ki izvajajo programe PHARE in ISPA v novih državah članicah; vendar poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva zagotoviti, da ne bo ponovila iste napake v primeru Romunije, Bolgarije in bodočih držav pristopnic;
Is nevertheless concerned by the failure to ensure that the accreditation process for many PHARE and ISPA agencies in the new Member States was completed before accession; urges the Commission, however, to endeavour to ensure that such a failure does not occur in relation to Romania, Bulgaria and the future acceding countries;
vendar pa ugotavlja, da je vrednost programa PHARE v smislu "učiti se z delom" omejena, saj so upravljani programi občutno drugačni kot programi Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj in Evropski socialni sklad, za katere bi se morali pripravljati, ter vsekakor ostaja velika potreba po večji pomoči pri vzpostavljanju institucij za upravljanje strukturnih skladov po pristopu; izraža zaskrbljenost glede sposobnosti držav kandidatk, da bi po pristopu lahko sprejele sredstva strukturnih skladov;
Notes, however, that the value of the PHARE programme in terms of 'learning by doing' is limited as the programmes managed differ significantly from the ERDF and ESF programmes for which they are meant to be preparing, and that there remains a significant need for greater institution-building support to help manage structural funds after accession; expresses concern about the capacity of the candidate countries to absorb structural funds after accession;
vendar pa načeloma pozdravlja predlog novega enotnega instrumenta za pripravo na upravljanje strukturnih skladov, pod pogojem, da njegova sestava ni preveč zapletena; poudarja potrebo po primernem nadzornem okviru, vendar poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo novi instrument čim bolj preprost, da bi na ta način izvajanje ne bilo ovirano;
Welcomes in principle, therefore, the proposal for a new single instrument for preparing for management of the structural funds, provided that its design is not overcomplicated; whilst underlining the need for an appropriate control framework, therefore urges the Commission to ensure that the new instrument is as kept simple as possible in order not to hinder its implementation;
zaključuje z dejstvom, da so bila prizadevanja in cilji programa SEPARD, prvega popolnoma decentraliziranega instrumenta predpristopne pomoči, odlični, čeprav niso bili v celoti doseženi; ugotavlja koristi programa SAPARD, ki ni samo pospeševal gospodarskega razvoja v državah kandidatkah, temveč je tudi spodbudil ljudi, da mislijo na nov razumnejši način, s poudarkom na projektu; ugotavlja, da je program prinesel koristi v smislu "učiti se z delom", s tem je oskrbel državne upravne organe v državah pristopnicah z neposrednimi izkušnjami glede upravljanja skladov Skupnosti; meni, da bodo vse izkušnje, pridobljene s tem programom, vsekakor dodana vrednost pri izvajanju bodočih programov Skupnosti; naproša Komisijo, da izboljša predhodno analizo potreb, da bi tako še bolj povečala dodano vrednost;
Concludes that the aims and objectives of SAPARD, as the first pre-accession aid to be fully decentralised, were excellent, even if it did not fully achieve them; acknowledges the benefit of the SAPARD programme, which not only stimulated economic development in candidate countries but also encouraged people to think in a new way which was more rational and project-based; acknowledges that the programme was beneficial in terms of learning by doing, in that it provided national administrative authorities in the accession states with direct experience in the management of Community funds; considers that the overall experience gained with this programme will definitely be of added value in the implementation of future Community programmes; urges the Commission to improve its ex-ante analysis of needs, so as to further increase added value;
priznava, da sistem decentraliziranega upravljanja, uporabljen pri izvajanju programa, na splošno deluje dobro, vendar poziva Komisijo, naj ga še dodatno izboljša na podlagi izkušenj, pridobljenih ob reševanju problemov, in zagotovi več podpore državam pristopnicam ob pojavu problemov ter večji nadzor programa samega;
Acknowledges that the decentralised management system used to implement the programme generally functions well, but urges the Commission to improve it further by learning from the problems encountered so far, providing more support to accession states when problems are found and doing more to follow up the programme;
opozarja, da med drugim zapleteni postopki in pravne negotovosti vodijo k občutni nezadostni porabi skladov; razočaran je, da je bila po petih letih izvajanja, glede na podatke z dne 15. decembra 2004 izplačana samo polovica sredstev končnim porabnikom; vsekakor pa izraža zadovoljstvo, da sredstva programa SAPARD ne bodo izgubljena zaradi zamud; vendar opozarja Komisijo, da želeno pospeševanje izplačil ne sme pod nobenim pogojem izločiti nadzora in kontrole programa;
Notes that, among other things, complex procedures and legal uncertainties lead to significant under-utilisation of funds, and is disappointed that after five years of implementation only half of the money was obtained by the (final) beneficiaries according to data as at 15 December 2004; is pleased, however, that no SAPARD money will be lost because of delays; nevertheless, points out to the Commission that under no circumstances should the desirable acceleration of payments eliminate regulation and supervision of the programme;
ugotavlja, da je bila večina sredstev programa SAPARD namenjena projektom, ki so povečali proizvodnjo, in zahteva, naj se v okviru novih programov nameni večji poudarek kakovosti, okoljskim in zdravstvenim standardom;
Notes that most of the SAPARD funds were spent on projects which increased production, and urges that greater emphasis be placed on quality, environmental and health standards in the new programmes;
priznava, da je bilo izplačevanje sredstev bolje upravljano kot pri programu PHARE, vendar zahteva še dodatna izboljšanja, da bi se na ta način zmanjšale izgube denarja Evropske unije;
Admits that clearance of accounts was better managed than in the case of PHARE, but urges further improvements to reduce loss of EU money;
izreka pohvalo Komisiji za prizadevanja, ki jih je vlagala prek posebne finančne pomoči v okviru predpristopne strategije za Malto in Ciper, s čimer je tema dvema državama pomagala pri pripravah na članstvo; vendar obžaluje, da sta bila Malta in Ciper izključena iz glavnih predpristopnih instrumentov, PHARE, SAPARD in ISPA, in so bile zato njune možnosti za pripravo na upravljanje sredstev Skupnosti bolj omejene.
Commends the Commission for the efforts made through the specific financial assistance in the pre-accession strategy for Malta and Cyprus in helping these two countries prepare for membership; regrets, however, that both Malta and Cyprus were excluded from the main pre-accession financial instruments, PHARE, SAPARD and ISPA, and therefore had more limited opportunities to prepare for managing Community Funds.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003, Oddelek I − Evropski parlament ( C6-0015/2005 − 2004/2041(DEC))
European Parliament decision on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section I - European Parliament ( C6-0015/2005 - 2004/2041(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju poročila o prihodkih in odhodkih ter bilance stanja za proračunsko leto 2003 ( C6-0015/2005 ),
having regard to the revenue and expenditure account and balance sheet in respect of the financial year 2003 ( C6-0015/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju Letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2003 in odgovorov institucij UL C 293, 30.11.2004, str.
having regard to the annual report of the Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 2003, together with the institutions" replies OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti s tem povezanih poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES UL C 294, 30.11.2004, str.
having regard to the Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions, provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty OJ C 294, 30.11.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 275 Pogodbe ES in člena 179a Pogodbe Euratom,
having regard to Article 275 of the EC Treaty and Article 179a of the Euratom Treaty,
, zlasti členov 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe,
, particularly Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
UL L 356, 31.12.1977, str.
having regard to the Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977 applicable to the general budget of the European Communities OJ L 356, 31.12.1977, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 71 in 74(3) ter Priloge V k svojemu Poslovniku,
having regard to Rules 71 and 74(3) of its Rules of Procedure and Annex V thereto,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0063/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0063/2005 ),
ker Računsko sodišče v zvezi z Evropskim parlamentom v odstavku 9.15 Letnega poročila za proračunsko leto 2003 ugotavlja, "da so revidirane transakcije načeloma zakonite in pravilne",
whereas the Court of Auditors in paragraph 9.15 of its annual report for the financial year 2003 found as regards the European Parliament that "the transactions audited were substantially legal and regular",
ker se Finančna uredba z dne 25. junija 2002 in Poslovnik Parlamenta, kakor je bil spremenjen 23. oktobra 2002, uporabljata od 1. januarja 2003 v zvezi s postopkovnimi pravili, ki urejajo postopek razrešnice,
whereas the Financial Regulation of 25 June 2002 and the Rules of Procedure of Parliament as amended on 23 October 2002 apply with effect from 1 January 2003 as regards procedural rules governing the discharge procedure,
ker je bil Poslovnik Parlamenta spremenjen 23. oktobra 2002 tako, da določa podelitev razrešnice predsedniku in ne generalnemu sekretarju,
whereas Parliament's Rules of Procedure were amended on 23 October 2002 to provide that discharge is to be given to the President rather than to the Secretary-General,
podeli svojemu predsedniku razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna za proračunsko leto 2003;
Grants its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2003;
navaja svoje pripombe v priloženi resoluciji;
Records its comments in the accompanying resolution;
naroči svojemu predsedniku , naj ta sklep in priloženo resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, Računskemu sodišču in Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic ter ju objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Instructs its President to forward this decision and the accompanying resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors and the Ombudsman and to have them published in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2003, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament ( C6-0015/2005 − 2004/2041(DEC))
European Parliament resolution containing the comments which are an integral part of the decision on the discharge for implementing the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2003, Section I - European Parliament ( C6-0015/2005 - 2004/2041(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti s tem povezanih poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES UL C 294, 30.11.2004, str.
having regard to the Statement of Assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty OJ C 294, 30.11.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija 2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti UL L 248, 16.09.2002, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
, zlasti členov 145, 146 in 147 Uredbe;
, particularly Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
ob upoštevanju členov 71 in 74(3) ter Priloge V svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 71 and 74(3) of its Rules of Procedure and Annex V thereto,
ker Računsko sodišče v zvezi z Evropskim parlamentom v odstavku 9.15 Letnega poročila za finančno leto 2003 ugotavlja, "da so revidirane transakcije načeloma zakonite in pravilne",
whereas the Court of Auditors in paragraph 9.15 of its annual report for the financial year 2003 found as regards the European Parliament that "the transactions audited were substantially legal and regular",
ker je treba resolucijo o razrešnici 2002, ki je bila sprejeta 21. aprila 2004 UL L 330, 4.11.2004, p.
whereas its resolution of 21 April 2004 OJ L 330, 4.11.2004, p.
, spremljati in oceniti napredek pri izvajanju njenih priporočil,
on the discharge for 2002 should be followed up and progress in implementing its recommendations assessed,
upošteva številke, s katerimi so bili zaključeni računi Evropskega parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2003, in sicer:
Takes note of the figures with which the European Parliament's accounts for the 2003 financial year were closed, namely:
Odobrena proračunska sredstva za proračunsko leto 2003
Appropriations for the 2003 financial year
Odobrena proračunska sredstva, prenesena iz proračunskega leta 2002
Appropriations carried over from the 2002 financial year
Odobrena proračunska sredstva 2003
Appropriations 2003
Odobrena proračunska sredstva iz namenskih prejemkov
Appropriations from assigned revenue
Člen 9(1) in (4) Finančne uredbe
Article 9(1) & 9(4) of Financial Regulation
Finančna uredba z dne 21. decembra 1977.
Financial Regulation of 21 December 1977.
Člen 9(2) in (5) Finančne uredbe
Article 9(2) & 9(5) of Financial Regulation
Odobrena proračunska sredstva, prenesena v 2004
Appropriations carried over to 2004
Člen 10 Finančne
Article 10 of Financial
Bilanca stanja z dne 31. decembra 2003: 1 407 572 773
Balance sheet at 31 December 2003: 1 407 572 773
opozarja, da je leta 2003 bilo 98,98 % odobrenih proračunskih sredstev, vnesenih v proračun Parlamenta, dodeljenih s stopnjo zapadlosti 1,02 % in da je bila v prejšnjih letih dosežena visoka stopnja izvajanja proračuna;
Notes that in 2003 98,98 % of the appropriations entered in Parliament's budget were committed with a cancellation rate of 1,02 % and that as in previous years a very high level of budget implementation was achieved;