natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da so peticije orodje, s katerim je mogoče oceniti, kaj evropska javnost pričakuje od EU in do kakšne mere lahko EU ta pričakovanja uresniči;
Believes that petitions offer an instrument with which to gauge what the European public expects from the European Union and the extent to which the European Union manages to deliver;
opozarja, da so peticije orodje, s katerim lahko državljani EU opozarjajo na pomanjkljivosti v zakonodaji Skupnosti ter opozorijo institucije EU na kršitve ali nepravilno izvajanje te zakonodaje;
Recalls the role of petitions as a tool to enable EU citizens both to signal loopholes in Community legislation and to alert the European institutions about any infringement or misapplication thereof;
poudarja, da lahko Evropski parlament s pomočjo peticij oceni dvoumnosti pri uporabi in izvajanju zakonodaje skupnosti na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, in, kjer je potrebno, tudi sprejme ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo teh dvoumnosti;
Underlines the opportunity that petitions offer the European Parliament to assess and, where necessary, take action to surmount, ambiguities in the application and implementation of Community law at European, national, regional and local levels;
poudarja, da je treba sodelovati s Komisijo pri iskanju ustreznih rešitev za skrb zbujajoče zadeve, na katere državljani EU opozorijo Odbor za peticije, saj kažejo na to, da zakonodaja, politika in dejavnosti Skupnosti neposredno vplivajo na življenje posameznikov;
Stresses the importance of cooperation with the Commission in finding appropriate solutions to matters of concern which European citizens bring to the attention of the Committee on Petitions, inasmuch as they reflect the direct impact of Community legislation, policies and activities on individuals;
obžaluje, da državam članicam pogosto ni uspelo pravilno izvajati okoljskih standardov Skupnosti, ter meni, da je treba izboljšati doslednost pri nadzoru, zlasti glede spoštovanja zakonodaje Skupnosti o zaščiti biološke raznovrstnosti in presoji vpliva nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov ter načrtov na okolje;
Regrets the widespread failure by Member States to implement Community environmental norms correctly, and considers that there is a need for improved consistency in the monitoring, notably, of respect for the rules of Community law on the protection of biodiversity and on the assessment of the impact of certain public and private projects and plans on the environment;
pozdravlja 23. letno poročilo Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0416 ), v katerem priznava pomembno vlogo postopka vlaganja peticij pri ugotavljanju kršitev;
Welcomes the Commission's 23rd Annual Report on monitoring the application of Community Law ( COM(2006)0416 ), which acknowledges the role of the petitions procedure in identifying infringements;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj ga obvesti o odločitvah o uvedbi postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev takoj, ko jih sprejme, ter o pomembnih odločitvah Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, predvsem kadar Parlament prejme peticijo v zvezi z zadevnim vprašanjem, in ugotavlja, da se Komisija ni odzvala na nenehne pozive Odbora za peticije glede tega;
Once again requests the Commission to notify decisions on the opening of infringement proceedings as soon as it makes such a decision, and also relevant decisions by the Court of Justice, in particular when Parliament has been petitioned on the issue in question, and observes that the Commission has not followed up on repeated calls by the Committee on Petitions in this area;
poziva Odbor za peticije, naj pisno in v čim krajšem času sporoči svoje odločitve o peticijah, ki jih obravnava na svojih sestankih, zato da bi se izognili nesporazumom in napačnim razlagam v množičnih medijih ali pri vlagateljih peticij;
Calls on the Committee on Petitions to notify, in writing and within a short time, its decisions relating to petitions that it considers at its meetings, so as to avoid misunderstandings and false interpretations by the mass media and petitioners;
ponovno poudarja, da se je treba uskladiti pri obravnavi vprašanj, ki jih državljani na Parlament naslovijo v obliki peticije, na Komisijo pa kot pritožbo, glede na to, da je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, zagotovljena v Pogodbi, da Parlament nudi pregleden okvir za razprave, kar je pogoj za večjo javno odgovornost, in da je treba pri tem prednost nameniti obravnavanju peticij;
Reiterates the importance of coordination in dealing with issues that are subject to both a petition to Parliament and a complaint to the Commission, given that the right to petition is a fundamental right, safeguarded by the Treaty, that Parliament provides a transparent framework for debates, which is a prerequisite for enhanced public accountability, and that in this context primacy must be accorded to the petitions process;
ponovno izraža zaskrbljenost Odbora za peticije, ker Komisija neupravičeno predolgo (pogosto tudi več let) obravnava in zaključuje postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ter nezadovoljstvo, ker države članice pogosto ne upoštevajo odločitev Sodišča; meni, da to ogroža verodostojnost oblikovanja in doslednega izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti ter povzroča nezaupanje v cilje EU;
Restates the Committee on Petitions' concern at the unjustified and excessive amount of time – often spanning several years – which the Commission takes to pursue and conclude infringement proceedings and its dissatisfaction with the frequent examples of non-compliance by Member States with decisions of the Court of Justice; considers that this undermines the credibility of the formulation and coherent application of Community law and that it serves to discredit the objectives of the EU;
ponovno poudarja, da mora Komisija izkoristiti možnost v skladu s členom 228 Pogodbe ES, da države članice privede pred Sodišče, na podlagi česar se jih lahko kaznuje z globo v obliki pavšalnih zneskov ali denarne kazni, kadar odlagajo izvajanje odločb Sodišča v postopkih ugotavljanja kršitev;
Reaffirms the need for the Commission to make use of the possibility of bringing Member States before the Court of Justice under Article 228 of the EC Treaty, so that fines in the form of lump sums and penalty payments may be imposed whenever Member States delay the implementation of judgments of the Court of Justice in infringement proceedings;
meni, da mora Komisija za zagotovitev verodostojnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti in enakih pogojev na notranjem trgu sprejeti odločne ukrepe proti kršitvam zakonodaje Skupnosti, vsaj v primerih nacionalnega pomena, ki postavljajo precedenčni primer za nacionalno sodno prakso, ter da taki ukrepi lahko močno zmanjša posledično potrebo državljanov po pritožbah Komisiji in peticijah Parlamentu na podobno temo;
Is of the opinion that, in order to ensure the credibility of Community law and a level playing field in the internal market, firm action needs to be taken by the Commission against infringements of Community law, at least in nationally important cases which set a precedent for national jurisprudence, and that such action could significantly reduce any subsequent need for citizens to complain to the Commission and petition Parliament on analogous issues;
pozdravlja trajni dialog med Odborom za peticije in Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic; poudarja, da je Odbor za peticije podprl posebna poročila o evropskih šolah in o preglednosti sej Sveta, ter pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija uspešno obravnavala pritožbe o domnevnih kršitvah, in podpira zahtevo varuha človekovih pravic, da se mu poveča proračun;
Welcomes the constant dialogue between the Committee on Petitions and the European Ombudsman; points out that the Committee on Petitions supported the Special Reports on the European Schools and on the transparency of the Council's meetings, welcomes the successful resolution brought about by the Commission's handling of complaints alleging an infringement, and supports the Ombudsman's request for an increase in his budget;
, ki je ugotovilo, da pri ukrepanju OLAF ni prišlo do kršitve zakonodaje, treba parlamentarni postopek v teku glede posebnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic v zvezi s pritožbo 2485/2004/GG zaključiti;
, which found that no breach of law had been committed regarding the action taken by OLAF, Parliament's proceedings on the outstanding Special Report of the Ombudsman referring to complaint 2485/2004/GG must be closed;
potrjuje, da mora Svet kot institucija tesneje sodelovati pri dejavnostih odbora, in spodbuja sodelovanje Sveta na sejah odbora na ustrezni ravni v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljši pripravi zakonodaje UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
Confirms the need for greater involvement on the part of the Council, as an institution, in the Committee's activities, and encourages its participation in meetings of the Committee at the appropriate level, as stated in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
, ki so ga dne 16. decembra 2003 sprejeli Svet, Evropski parlament in Komisija;
, adopted on 16 December 2003 by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
znova predlaga, naj Svet imenuje visokega uradnika za usklajevanje vprašanj v zvezi s peticijami, saj se veliko peticij dotika občutljivih političnih tem, ki zadevajo prenos zakonodaje Skupnosti s strani držav članic;
Reiterates the proposal that the Council designate a senior official to coordinate matters related to petitions, given that many petitions touch upon sensitive political issues concerning the transposition by Member States of Community legislation;
ponovno poudarja, da imajo države članice ključno vlogo pri pravilnem izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti in da je uporaba te zakonodaje v praksi odločilna za to, da bi EU postala pomembnejša za svoje državljane; poudarja, da morajo predstavniki držav članic in njihovih parlamentov bolj sodelovati v razpravah Odbora za peticije;
Emphasises once again the key role of the Member States in correctly implementing Community legislation, and underlines that the practical application thereof is decisive for the purposes of increasing the relevance of the European Union for its citizens; stresses the need for enhanced participation by representatives of the Member States and their parliaments in the debates of the Committee on Petitions;
opozarja, da Pogodba EU daje Parlamentu pristojnost za sprožanje postopkov iz člena 7(1) Pogodbe, ki lahko povzroči imenovanje neodvisnih posameznikov za poročanje o potencialni resni kršitvi načel, na katerih temelji Evropska unija, vključno s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic, ki jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin;
Recalls that the EU Treaty confers on Parliament the power to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 7(1) of the EU Treaty, which can lead to the appointment of independent persons to report on the risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the principles on which the European Union is founded, including in particular respect for human rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
pozdravlja delovanje Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society" ter prispevek članov Odbora za peticije in njegovega sekretariata, ki so neposredno sodelovali pri delu odbora; meni, da so se na podlagi odločitve o ustanovitvi tega odbora za nadaljnje obravnavanje prejetih peticij okrepila prizadevanja za zagotovitev pravilne uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti v vseh državah članicah;
Welcomes the activity of the Temporary Committee of Inquiry into the Crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society and the contribution made by the members of the Committee on Petitions and its secretariat who have directly participated in its work; considers that the decision to set up that committee as a follow-up to petitions received has enhanced the efforts to ensure the correct application of Community law in all Member States;
spodbuja napotitev misij za ugotavljanje dejstev v različne države članice v skladu s členom 192 svojega Poslovnika, da bi preučili vprašanja vlagateljev peticij in s tem spodbujali iskanje učinkovitih in pragmatičnih rešitev, ki so v interesu državljanov;
Encourages the practice of sending fact-finding missions pursuant to Rule 192 of its Rules of Procedure to various Member States of the EU to investigate issues raised by petitioners as a way to facilitate effective and pragmatic solutions in the interests of the citizen;
poudarja, da so te misije pomembne za izboljšanje komunikacije z državljani in boljšo ozaveščenost v državah članicah o dejavnostih Evropskega parlamenta nasploh in zlasti Odbora za peticije;
Stresses the significance of those missions in the efforts to improve communication with citizens and to raise awareness in the Member States about the activities of the European Parliament, in general, and of the Committee on Petitions, in particular;
poudarja, da je boljše razumevanje funkcije peticij kot sredstva, ki državljanom omogoča, da zahtevajo popravo krivic, tesno povezano s kakovostjo informacij o zakonodaji, politiki in ciljih Skupnosti, do katerih ima dostop splošna javnost v Evropi;
Emphasises that better understanding of the function of petitions as a tool enabling citizens to seek redress is closely connected to the quality of the information available to the general public in Europe about Community legislation, policies and objectives;
ugotavlja, da se število prejetih peticij v drugem letu po širitvi EU na 25 držav članic ni bistveno spremenilo; vendar opaža, da bo po pristopu Romunije in Bolgarije januarja 2007 Parlament po vsej verjetnosti prejel precej večje število peticij državljanov iz teh držav;
Notes that, during the second year since the enlargement of the EU to 25 Member States, the number of petitions received by Parliament has remained relatively constant; observes, however, that the accession of Romania and Bulgaria in January 2007 is likely to produce a considerable number of petitions from the citizens of those countries;
pozdravlja dogovor odbora o povečanju števila njegovih članov na 40 polnopravnih članov in meni, da bo državljanom EU ter osebam, ki prebivajo na ozemlju EU, s tem po vsej verjetnosti omogočeno boljše razumevanje njihovega primera v odboru, zaradi česar se bo lahko Parlament bolje odzval na pričakovanja vlagateljev peticij;
Welcomes the agreement within the Committee which has led to the increase in its membership to 40 full members, and considers that this is likely to ensure that European citizens and people residing in the territory of the EU obtain an even better understanding of their case in committee, thereby enabling Parliament to respond better to petitioners' expectations;
poudarja, da je treba okrepiti sekretariat odbora za izpolnitev potreb po jezikovnem, pravnem in političnem strokovnem znanju, saj bi s tem omogočili krajši odzivni čas, učinkovitejše preiskave in enako dostopnost storitev za vse državljane EU;
Underlines the need to strengthen the Committee's secretariat in order to cover the need for linguistic, legal and political expertise, so that response times may become shorter and investigations more effective, and so that the service which it provides may be equally available to all citizens of the EU;
ponovno poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti potrebna finančna sredstva za nadgrajevanje programske opreme sistema za elektronsko vlaganje peticij, ki deluje kot baza podatkov in orodje za upravljanje ter nudi informacije o poteku obravnave peticij, zato da bi izboljšali preglednost in učinkovitost delovanja odbora;
Reiterates the need to find the necessary financial resources to continue the development of the E-petition software system, which functions both as a database and as a management tool providing information about the petitions workflow, thus reinforcing the transparency and efficiency of the Committee's activity;
generalnega sekretarja poziva k nujni prenovitvi portala državljanov na spletni strani Evropskega parlamenta, da bi se izboljšala opaznost portala glede pravice vlaganja peticij, ter nadgradi njegovo podobo, da se zagotovita primerljivost in skladnost s spletno stranjo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki se za razliko od Odbora za peticije posebej ukvarja s pritožbami državljanov glede nepravilnosti v delovanju institucij ali organih EU;
Requests the Secretary-General to conduct an urgent review of the 'Citizens Portal' on the website of the European Parliament with the objective of enhancing the visibility of the portal relating to the right of petition, and upgrading its presentation in order to ensure its comparability and compatibility with the website of the European Ombudsman which, unlike the Committee on Petitions, is concerned specifically with citizens' complaints concerning allegations of maladministration within the EU institutions or bodies;
opominja, da Evropski parlament od leta 1998 poziva k reviziji Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o okrepitvi pravice do peticije iz leta 1989 UL C 120, 16.5.1989, str.
Recalls that, since 1998, Parliament has called for a review of the 1989 Interinstitutional Agreement on strengthening the right of petition OJ C 120, 16.5.1989, p.
; ponovno poziva Svet in Komisijo k reviziji tega sporazuma, da se zagotovijo učinkovitejša pravna sredstva ter se določi jasnejši in skladnejši okvir bistvenega sodelovanja med institucijami na zadevnem področju;
; reiterates its urgent requests for the Council and the Commission to undertake that review with a view to establishing a more effective means of redress and defining a clear and coherent framework for essential cooperation between the institutions in the area concerned;
pozdravlja odločitev o reviziji veljavnih pravil za postopek vlaganja peticij, da bi pojasnili, kako poteka ocenjevanje dopustnosti peticij, in okrepili postopke, povezane z varovanjem in zaupnostjo podatkov, ne da bi bila pri tem ogrožena nujna preglednost postopka za vlaganje peticij;
Welcomes the decision to conduct a review of the current rules governing the petitions procedure in order to provide clarification regarding the assessment of the admissibility of petitions and to reinforce procedures related to data protection and confidentiality without undermining the essential transparency of the petitions process itself;
poudarja pomen varovanja okolja ter pozdravlja izrazito zanimanje Odbora za peticije za peticije glede okolja, ki jih obravnava na svojih sejah;
Stresses the importance of protecting the environment and welcomes the Committee's intense interest in the petitions concerning the environment that it considers at its meetings;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo Odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter njihovim odborom za peticije in varuhom človekovih pravic oziroma podobnim pristojnim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and their committees on petitions and ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. novembra 2007 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o četrtletnih statističnih podatkih glede prostih delovnih mest v Skupnosti ( KOM(2007)0076 – C6-0090/2007 – 2007/0033(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 November 2007 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on quarterly statistics on Community job vacancies ( COM(2007)0076 – C6-0090/2007 – 2007/0033(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0076 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0076 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 285(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0090/2007 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0090/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0335/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0335/2007 ),
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Uredbi (ES) št. 453/2008.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 453/2008.)
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. novembra 2007 o osnutku Sklepa Sveta o uporabi vseh določb schengenskega pravnega reda v Češki republiki, Republiki Estoniji, Republiki Latviji, Republiki Litvi, Republiki Madžarski, Republiki Malti, Republiki Poljski, Republiki Sloveniji in Slovaški republiki (11722/2007 – C6-0244/2007 – 2007/0810(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 November 2007 on the draft Council decision on the full application of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic (11722/2007 – C6-0244/2007 – 2007/0810(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju osnutka Sklepa Sveta (11722/2007),
having regard to the draft Council decision (11722/2007),
, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0244/2007 ),
pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0244/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0441/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0441/2007 ),
odobri osnutek sklepa Sveta, kakor je bilo spremenjen;
Approves the draft Council decision as amended;
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Svet Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Uvodna izjava 4 (4)
Text proposed by the Council Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 4 (4)
Svet je X XXXXXX 2007 ugotovil, da zadevne države članice izpolnjujejo pogoje na vseh omenjenih področjih.
On X XXXXXX 2007, the Council concluded that the conditions in each of the areas mentioned had been fulfilled by the Member States concerned.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. novembra 2007 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o vzpostavitvi večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju ( KOM(2007)0169 – C6-0110/2007 – 2007/0058(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 15 November 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation establishing a multi-annual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean ( COM(2007)0169 – C6-0110/2007 – 2007/0058(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0169 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0169 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0110/2007 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0110/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0408/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0408/2007 ),
Države članice, vsaj mesec dni preden Komisiji pošljejo seznam plovil in pasti, obravnavanih v členih 12 in 13, po elektronski pošti Komisiji predložijo tudi ribolovni načrt, ki povzema število plovil in pasti, za katere bi želeli zaprositi za dovoljenje za ribolov, skupaj s podatki o predvidenem ribolovnem naporu.
At least one month before the list of vessels and traps which is referred to in Articles 12 and 13 is sent to the Commission, the Member States shall submit electronically to the Commission a fisheries plan indicating the number of vessels and traps for which fishing licences are to be requested, accompanied by information concerning the expected fishing effort.