natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da se Evropska unija vedno bolj uveljavlja kot politična skupnost skupnih vrednot in širi svoj prvotni cilj, ki je jasno osredotočen na trg;
Considers that the European Union is establishing itself increasingly as a political community of shared values and is further broadening its initial objective, clearly focused on the market;
meni, da je več ciljev Unije, kot so razvijanje področja svobode, varnosti in pravice, boj proti diskriminaciji, spodbujanje preglednosti in zaščita varstva podatkov, že neločljivo povezanih s spodbujanjem temeljnih pravic;
Considers that several Union objectives, such as those of developing the area of freedom, security and justice, combating discrimination, promoting transparency and protecting data protection, are already indissociable from the promotion of fundamental rights;
opozarja, da je potrebno v celoti uveljaviti in spoštovati temeljne pravice ter individualne svoboščine ob razširitvi pristojnosti Unije in da so nove oblike terorizma še povečale potrebo po zagotavljanju kolektivne varnosti; zato je mnenja, da je treba s primernimi politikami doseči ravnotežje med individualnimi svoboščinami ter kolektivno varnostjo, da bosta ta dva cilja usklajena;
Notes the need for fundamental rights and individual freedoms to be fully asserted and observed following the broadening of the competences of the Union, and that the new form of terrorism has further increased the need to ensure collective security; is therefore of the opinion that a balance between individual freedoms and collective security has to be achieved through adequate policies in order to make these two objectives compatible;
meni, da je nujno treba uveljaviti vrednote, proglašene v ustanovnih pogodbah in v novi Ustavi;
Considers it essential to give effect to the values proclaimed in the founding Treaties and in the new Constitution;
opozarja, da je preglednost demokratično načelo, ki je nujno potrebno za razmerje med Unijo in njenimi državljani, pravosodjem Skupnosti in njeno zakonodajo, EU in njenimi državami članicami ter med EU in Svetom Evrope;
Notes that transparency is a democratic principle which is essential for the relationship between the Union and its citizens, the Community judiciary and its legislature, the EU and its Member States, as well as the EU and the Council of Europe;
opozarja, da si Evropska unija in države članice delijo pristojnost za človekove pravice ter so zato na svojih področjih pristojnosti obvezane spoštovati človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, ob upoštevanju svoje zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004; poziva Komisijo, naj pred začetkom katerega koli pravnega postopka sprejme ukrepe za zagotovitev vsega potrebnega sodelovanja in pomoči, da omogoči državam članicam premagati katere koli težave, s katerimi se soočajo pri izvajanju prava Skupnosti in ukrepov Unije; meni, da je posebna stopnja preglednosti bistvenega pomena, ko pride do prenosa ukrepov Unije, ki vplivajo na temeljne pravice;
Notes that the European Union and Member States share competence for human rights, and that therefore they are obliged to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms in their respective spheres of competence in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, taking into account its abovementioned resolution of 20 April 2004; urges the Commission to take steps to guarantee all the cooperation and assistance required, even before it initiates any legal proceedings, with a view to enabling the Member States to overcome any problems they encounter in implementing Community law and Union measures; regards a special degree of transparency as essential when it comes to transposing Union measures which have a bearing on fundamental rights;
Naproti politiki EU na področju temeljnih pravic
Towards an EU fundamental rights policy
pozdravlja podpis Ustavne pogodbe, če ta Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti zagotavlja popolno pristojnost za področje svobode, varnosti in pravice, pristop k EČKP, vključitev Listine o temeljnih pravicah v Pogodbo in povečano uporabo postopka soodločanja, s tem pa spodbuja vlogo Evropskega parlamenta;
Welcomes the signature of the Constitutional Treaty, insofar as it provides for the Court of Justice to be fully competent for the area of freedom, security and justice, the accession to the ECHR, the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Treaty and more extensive use of the co-decision procedure, thereby enhancing the role of the European Parliament;
meni, da je izvajanje temeljnih pravic cilj vseh evropskih politik; v ta namen morajo institucije EU dejavno spodbujati in varovati temeljne pravice ter jih v celoti upoštevati, vključno z njihovim čezmejnim pomenom, pri pripravi osnutkov in sprejemanju zakonodaje;
Considers that the implementation of fundamental rights is a goal of all European policies; to this end EU institutions should actively promote and therefore protect fundamental rights and fully take them and their relevance across borders into account when drafting and adopting legislation;
meni, da je ključnega političnega pomena uvesti pojem spodbujanja temeljnih pravic med cilje, ki se bodo uresničevali v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in reorganizacijo pravnega reda Skupnosti in Unije; poziva, da vsako novo politiko, zakonodajni predlog in program spremlja presoja vpliva v zvezi s spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic; presoja naj bi bila del obrazložitve predloga;
Regards it as politically essential to incorporate the notion of promoting fundamental rights among the objectives to be pursued in connection with the simplification and reorganisation of the Community and Union acquis; calls for any new policy, legislative proposal and programme to be accompanied by an impact assessment as regards respect for fundamental rights; that assessment should form part of the justification for the proposal;
pozdravlja ustanovitev skupine komisarjev za "temeljne pravice, protidiskriminacijo in enako obravnavo"; poziva Komisijo in zlasti komisarje, odgovorne za temeljne pravice, da izdelajo izčrpno in usklajeno strategijo za zagotavljanje spoštovanja temeljnih pravic na vseh področjih politike Unije;
Welcomes the establishment of a Group of Commissioners on "Fundamental Rights, anti-discrimination and equal treatment"; calls on the Commission and especially the Commissioners responsible for fundamental rights to work out a comprehensive and coherent strategy to ensure that fundamental rights are observed in all areas of Union policy;
meni, da je Sodišče odigralo odločilno vlogo pri tem, da sta Skupnost in Unija postali "Skupnost" in Unija prava, zlasti s pomočjo plodnega dialoga med nacionalnimi in evropskimi sodniki v zvezi z nalogo zagotavljanja predhodnih razlag, ki jo pogodbe nalagajo Sodišču; podpira predlog Evropskega sveta v programu, ki je bil sprejet v Haagu in je usmerjen v krepitev dialoga med vrhovnimi sodišči držav članic ter meni, da takšne spodbude ne dokazujejo samo odločnosti najvišjih sodišč, da si delijo svoje izkušnje, ampak predstavljajo tudi začetek javne evropske politike, ki ima svoj smisel obstoja v skupnem cilju varovanja temeljnih pravic;
Takes the view that the Court of Justice has performed a decisive role in making the Community and the Union a 'Community' and a Union of law, in particular as a result of the fruitful dialogue between national and European judges in connection with the task of providing preliminary interpretations which the Treaties confer on the Court; supports the proposal put forward by the European Council in the programme adopted at The Hague to strengthen dialogue between the supreme courts of the Member States, and takes the view that such steps not only demonstrate the determination of the highest courts to share their experience, but also constitute the beginnings of a European public policy which finds its rationale in the shared objective of protecting fundamental rights;
poudarja, da države članice in ustanove Unije uživajo posebno pravico do vložitve tožb pred Sodiščem v korist prava, in zavzema stališče, da lahko Parlament z uporabo tega načina braniti pravice državljanov v primerih, v katerih akt Unije morebiti vpliva na temeljne pravice;
Points out that the Member States and the Union institutions enjoy a special right to bring actions before the Court in the interests of the law and takes the view that Parliament can, using that means, defend the rights of citizens in cases where fundamental rights might be affected by a Union act;
obžaluje, da so države članice v zvezi z izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti in Unije vse bolj nenaklonjene sprejemanju načela vzajemnega priznavanja in trdi, da je raven varstva temeljnih pravic v eni od držav članic neustrezna; v zvezi s tem opozarja na sodno prakso Sodišča Združena primera C-187/01 in C-385/01 Gözütok in Brügge [2003] ECR I-1345.
Regrets the fact that, in connection with the implementation of Community and Union law, the Member States are becoming more and more reluctant to accept the principle of mutual recognition, claiming that the level of protection of fundamental rights is inadequate in a given Member State; draws attention, in this connection, to the case law of the Court Joined Cases C-187/01 and C-385/01 Gözütok and Brügge [2003] ECR I-1345.
in poziva javne organe držav, ki morajo predložiti podrobne podatke za utemeljitev svoje nenaklonjenosti, in organe držav, ki takšne podatke zahtevajo, da predložijo vsa potrebna pojasnila;
and calls on both the public authorities of the States required to supply detailed information in order to justify their reluctance and the authorities of the States requesting such information to provide any clarifications necessary;
Sodelovanje z nacionalnimi institucijami za človekove pravice in nacionalnimi parlamenti
Cooperation with national human rights institutions and national parliaments
poudarja, da so v nekaterih državah članicah oblikovali nacionalne institucije za varstvo in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic, zlasti v zvezi s "Pariškimi načeli" Združenih narodov; poziva druge države članice, naj v ta namen ukrepajo in dodelijo nacionalnim odborom ter institucijam ustrezna finančna sredstva, med drugim ob upoštevanju, da pregledovanje vladnih politik na področju človekovih pravic predstavlja eno od funkcij teh organov, katerih cilj je preprečiti pomanjkljivosti in predlagati izboljšave, saj je učinkovitost povezana s preprečevanjem in ne samo z reševanjem težav;
Notes that some Member States have established national institutions for the protection and promotion of fundamental rights, in particular with reference to the United Nations "Paris principles"; calls on the other Member States to take steps to this end and to provide the national committees and institutes with adequate financial resources, bearing in mind, inter alia, that one of the functions of those bodies is to review governments' human rights policies to prevent shortcomings and suggest improvements, since efficiency lies in prevention and not only in solving problems;
podpira oblikovanje trajnega dialoga o temeljnih pravicah z nacionalnimi parlamenti držav članic;
Supports the establishment of an ongoing dialogue on fundamental rights with the national parliaments of the Member States;
meni, da zbiranje podatkov predstavlja prednostno nalogo, saj gre za metodološki pristop, ki omogoča primerjavo in analizo podatkov; meni, da imajo nacionalne institucije pri tem ključni pomen;
Is of the opinion that collecting data is a priority, as is methodological work to enable the data to be compared and analysed; considers that national institutions are key in this regard;
ostaja prepričan, da je varstvo človekovih pravic veliko bolj učinkovito, če se državljani sami zavedajo svojih pravic in so v stanju zahtevati njihovo varstvo, še preden nastopi potreba po pravnem ukrepanju, a jih je treba spodbujati k sodelovanju pri oblikovanju sklepov in izvajanju le-teh; je mnenja, da lahko v ta namen vzpostavitev nacionalnih odborov in institucij za temeljne pravice omogoči nevladnim organizacijam boljše strukturiranje svojih stališč, podrobnejšo opredelitev svojih zahtev in izpostavitev ravnanja, ki ga smatrajo kot nezakonitega; ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, da morajo nacionalne vladne in nevladne organizacije nadaljevati z izmenjavo najboljših praks na področju človekovih pravic;
Remains convinced that fundamental rights can be protected all the more effectively if citizens themselves are made aware of their rights and are in a position to demand the protection thereof well before legal action becomes necessary, by encouraging their involvement in shaping and implementing decisions; is of the opinion that, with that aim, the establishment of national committees and institutes for fundamental rights can enable NGOs both to establish clearer standpoints and to target more effectively their calls for action and their exposure of treatment regarded as unlawful; restates its view that national governmental and non-governmental organisations should exchange best practice regarding human rights;
meni, da mora biti Komisija pozorna na stalne in ponavljajoče se kršitve človekovih pravic (zlasti državljanskih pravic, kot sta aktivna in pasivna pravica do sodelovanja na volitvah), ki se dogajajo v nekaterih državah Unije in so bile predmet poročil komisarja za človekove pravice pri Svetu Evrope Alvara Gil-Roblesa;
Considers that the Commission should pay attention to the repeated and continuous violations of human rights - in particular civil rights such as the active and passive right to participate in election processes - committed in some Member States, which were the subject of reports by the Human Rights Commissioner of the Council of Europe, Mr Alvaro Gil-Robles;
Razširjanje načela varstva temeljnih pravic zunaj Unije
Spreading the principle of the protection of fundamental rights outside the Union
zavzema stališče, da mora univerzalnost in neločljivost temeljnih pravic spodbuditi Evropsko unijo in njene države članice, da pospešijo širitev teh pravic v odnosih s tretjimi državami, ne nazadnje z vidika sklenitve pridružitvenih sporazumov s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami, npr. z Združenimi narodi, ki so začeli postopek reforme s posebnim poudarkom na varstvu človekovih pravic; poudarja, da mora Evropska unija z nadaljnjo krepitvijo svojih zunanjih ukrepov na tem področju in s prispevkom k pripravi osnutka poročila Združenih narodov na to temo igrati dejavno vlogo pri izvajanju reforme;
Takes the view that the universality and indivisibility of fundamental rights must prompt the European Union and its Member States to encourage the spread of such rights in their relations with third countries, not least with a view to the conclusion of association agreements with third countries, and international organisations, such as the United Nations, which has embarked on a reform process which places particular emphasis on the protection of fundamental rights; stresses that the European Union as a body should play an active part in implementing such a reform by strengthening further its external action in this area and by contributing to the drafting of a United Nations report on this matter;
; verjame, da bi morala ta pravila urejati odnose med Unijo in več kot 120 državami, za katere se zdaj uporablja klavzula demokratičnosti kot ključni element kakršnega koli sporazuma, ki jih zavezuje;
; believes that the Code should govern relations between the Union and the more than 120 countries to which the democratic clause is currently applicable, as an essential element of the agreements of all kinds which bind them;
poziva Komisijo, naj v povezavi s svojim stališčem do Agencije izvede in predstavi Parlamentu temeljito študijo o potrebi po podobni strukturi (znotraj ali zunaj Komisije), ki bo priskrbela vse pomembne informacije o človekovih pravicah in vprašanjih demokracije v državah, ki jih ta agencija ne pokriva;
Calls on the Commission to undertake and to present to Parliament, in conjunction with its position on this Agency, a thorough study on the need for a similar structure (inside or outside the Commission) dealing with the provision of relevant information on human rights and democracy concerns in countries which are not covered by this Agency;
Sodelovanje z mednarodnimi organizacijami za človekove pravice
Cooperation with international human rights organisations
opozarja na pomembno vlogo različnih spremljevalnih mehanizmov Sveta Evrope in institucij na področju človekovih pravic; poziva institucije EU in Agencijo, da gradijo na tej izkušnji in upoštevajo te mehanizme z namenom njihove vključitve v postopek za delovanje v mreži in da uporabljajo standarde, ki jih je razvil Svet Evrope, in druge pomembne rezultate njegovega dela; trdno vztraja, da to sodelovanje ne sme povzročiti padca standardov EU;
Recalls the significant role of the various Council of Europe monitoring mechanisms and institutions in the human rights field; urges the EU institutions and the Agency to build on this experience, taking account of these mechanisms to incorporate them into a procedure for working in a network, and to make use of the standards developed by the Council of Europe and the other substantive results of its work; is adamant that this cooperation should not lead to any decline in EU standards;
verjame, da je treba izdelati delujoč model sodelovanja in da morajo obstajati konkretni predlogi v prihodnjem zakonodajnem predlogu Komisije v zvezi z Agencijo, vključno z jasnimi opredelitvami pristojnosti Agencije in različnih drugih agencij ter z institucializirano povezavo med Svetom Evrope in prihodnjo Agencijo za temeljne pravice, namen obeh je preprečevati podvajanja in priskrbeti Agenciji vse potrebne podatke;
Believes that a functional model of cooperation should be worked out and that there should be concrete proposals in the Commission's forthcoming legislative proposal on the Agency, including clear definitions of the competences of the Agency and of the various other agencies and an institutionalised link between the Council of Europe and the future Agency on Fundamental Rights, both to avoid duplication and to give the Agency all necessary input and to ensure its effectiveness;
Agencija kot operativno orodje za politiko EU na področju človekovih pravic kot celote
The Agency as an operational tool for the EU's human rights policy as a whole
poudarja, da mora ustanovitev Agencije prispevati k nadaljnjemu spodbujanju medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami in predstavljati jamstvo glede stalnega spoštovanja načel iz členov 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter meni, da mora Agencija zagotoviti vse potrebne informacije za razvoj zakonodajne dejavnosti Unije, njene nadzorovalne vloge ter njene politike osveščanja o temeljnih pravicah;
Points out that establishing the Agency should make a contribution to further enhancing mutual confidence between Member States and constitute a guarantee of continued observance of the principles set out in Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union and considers that the Agency should provide all the information required to develop the Union's legislative activity, monitoring role and policy on awareness raising for fundamental rights;
zavzema stališče, da mora imeti Agencija močna pooblastila in pristojnosti, ki ji omogočajo spremljanje razvoja izvajanja Listine o temeljnih pravicah znotraj Evropske unije in v državah pristopnicah, poudarja, da mora biti Agencija v stanju pokrivati tudi tretje države, če so te vpletene v vprašanja o človekovih pravicah, ki zadevajo Unijo, na primer v primerih domnevne kršitve klavzule demokratičnosti;
Takes the view that the Agency must have a strong mandate and the power to follow the development of the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights within the European Union and accession countries; stresses that the Agency should also be able to cover third countries when they are involved in human rights issues affecting the Union, for example in cases where there are suspected violations of the democracy clause;
meni, da mora Agencija za temeljne pravice uživati poseben status med agencijami EU; meni, da bo Agencija uživala večjo legitimnost, če bo Evropski parlament, kateremu bodo odgovorni, imenoval njene vodilne organe, ki bodo poročali pristojnim parlamentarnim odborom; prepričan je, da bosta neodvisnost in verodostojnost Agencije predpogoj za dobro sodelovanje Agencije in evropskih institucij;
Believes that the Fundamental Rights Agency should have special standing among EU agencies; believes that the Agency will enjoy enhanced legitimacy if its management bodies are appointed by, and answerable to, the European Parliament and report to the competent parliamentary committees; is convinced that the independence and credibility of the Agency is a prerequisite for proper interaction between it and the European institutions;
po njegovem mnenju je nujno, da se v vsakem pogledu Agencija obravnava kot popolnoma neodvisna; zato poudarja, da mora imeti dovolj osebja in proračunskih sredstev, ki ji omogočajo izpolniti ambiciozne naloge in pooblastila, ter visoko kakovostno, strokovno usposobljeno osebje s popolno integriteto in osebno verodostojnostjo;
Considers it essential for the Agency to be seen as fully independent in every respect; emphasises, therefore, that it should have sufficient staff and budgetary resources to allow it to fulfil its ambitious mandate and should be staffed with high-quality personnel with scientific expertise, unimpeachable integrity and personal credibility;
meni, da morajo ključne organe Agencije sestavljati neodvisni strokovnjaki (morebiti vključno s člani ustavnih sodišč) z najvišjim strokovnim ugledom iz držav članic ter visoki predstavniki institucij EU, Sveta Evrope in mednarodnih nevladnih organizacij; poudarja, da mora vodja Agencije uživati velik ugled na področju človekovih pravic in da ga mora imenovati Evropski parlament;
Considers that the key bodies of the Agency should be composed of independent experts (possibly including members of constitutional courts) of the highest professional repute from the Member States and high-level representatives of EU institutions, the Council of Europe and international NGOs; stresses that its head should enjoy an excellent record in the field of human rights and should be appointed by the European Parliament;
meni, da poskuša večina priporočil, naštetih v tej resoluciji, kot so ta, ki so navedena v naslednjih odstavkih:
Takes the view that most of the recommendations set out in this resolution, such as those contained in the following paragraphs:
11: ocenitev vpliva vsake zakonodajne in strateške pobude EU, ki se ravna po pristopu k ocenjevanju vplivov, ki ga je sprejela Komisija z dne 27. aprila 2005,
11: impact evaluation of every legislative and strategic EU initiative taking as model the approach on impact evaluation adopted by the Commission on April 27 2005;
13: spodbujanje dialoga in sodelovanja med vrhovnimi sodišči,
13: promotion of dialogue and cooperation between supreme courts;
16, 18 in 19: podpora inštitutom držav članic za temeljne pravice in komisijam za "enakost", ustanovljenih po Direktivi 2000/43/ES, glede zbiranja podatkov,
16, 18 and 19: support for Member State Institutes for fundamental rights and "equality" commissions established under Directive 2000/43/EC, in so far as data collection is concerned;
17: ustanovitev stalnega foruma z nacionalnimi parlamenti za vprašanja temeljnih pravic in vzpostavitev EU kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
17: establishment of a permanent forum with national parliaments on fundamental rights issues and establishment of the EU as an area of freedom, security and justice;
23: financiranje študije zunanjih dejavnikov, ki bi lahko vplivali na politike EU na področju človekovih pravic in morebitne posvetovalne vloge, ki bi jo imela evropska agencija za temeljne pravice,
23: financing a study on the external factors which could affect EU policies as regards human rights and the possible consultative role to be played by a European Fundamental Rights Agency;
24 in 25: strukturirano operativno sodelovanje in sinergija s Svetom Evrope,
24 and 25: structured operational cooperation and synergy with the Council of Europe;