natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker bi se lahko bilo smiselno, za boljšo kakovost pri obdelavi prošenj za azil in s tem za zmanjšanje števila sodnih postopkov in postopkovnih zamud, opreti na zadevne organizacije, recimo UNHCR, ki je razvila metodo podpore oblasti pri njihovih prizadevanjih za boljšo kakovost odločanja (Quality Initiative),
whereas, with a view to improving the processing of asylum applications, and thus reducing the number of court proceedings and procedural delays, it may make sense to draw on support from relevant organisations, for example UNHCR, which has developed a method intended to support authorities in their efforts to improve the quality of their decision-making (Quality Initiative),
ker je treba, kot je izjavil Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve 27. in 28. aprila 2006, podpreti uveljavitev enotnega postopka, da bi se izognili zamudam in s tem konkretno prispevali k večji učinkovitosti postopkov,
whereas, as the Justice and Home Affairs Council stated on 27 and 28 April 2006, efforts must be made to introduce a uniform procedure with a view to preventing delays and thus making a practical contribution to improving the effectiveness of the procedures,
ker kljub skupnim temeljnim ukrepom, ki so bili sprejeti na področju azila od začetka veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe naprej, države članice na nacionalni ravni še naprej izvajajo ukrepe in sprejemajo sklepe, ki vplivajo na druge države članice, zlasti v zvezi z zagotavljanjem mednarodne zaščite,
whereas, despite the existence of a common set of basic asylum-related measures adopted since the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam, at national level the Member States continue to implement measures or take decisions which have implications for the other Member States, in particular as regards the granting of international protection,
ugotavlja, da člen 29 Direktive 2005/85/ES določa pripravo minimalnega skupnega seznama tretjih držav, ki veljajo za varne države izvora, in opozarja, da ta seznam še vedno ni pripravljen in da Svet pri sprejemanju te direktive ni upošteval mnenja Parlamenta, zaradi česar je sedaj v teku postopek za razveljavitev Direktive 2005/85/ES pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti; ker bi bilo treba takšen seznam sprejeti s postopkom soodločanja; ker uvrstitev države na ta seznam ne pomeni, da bodo prosilci za azil iz te države avtomatično zavrnjeni, temveč, da bo v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo z dne 28. julija 1951 o statusu beguncev, kakor je bila spremenjena z Newyorškim protokolom z dne 31. januarja 1967 (Ženevska konvencija), vsaka prošnja obravnavana individualno,
whereas Article 29 of Directive 2005/85/EC provides for the drawing-up of a minimum common list of third countries regarded as safe countries of origin, and noting that on the one hand this list has still not been drawn up and on the other hand that the Council did not take into account Parliament's opinion when adopting that Directive, for which reason an action for annulment of Directive 2005/85/CE is now pending before the Court of Justice of the European Communities (the Court of Justice); whereas such a list should be adopted under the codecision procedure; whereas the inclusion of a country on that list does not mean automatically that asylum seekers from that country will be basically refused asylum, but rather that, according to the Geneva Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees, as amended by the New York Protocol of 31 January 1967 (Geneva Convention), there is an individual assessment of every single application,
ker je obžalovanja vredno, da se Svetu ni zdelo potrebno pri pripravi seznama varnih držav izvora uporabiti postopek soodločanja, in se z zanimanjem pričakuje sodbo, ki jo bo o tem vprašanju izreklo Sodišče,
whereas it is a matter for regret that the Council did not see fit to employ the codecision procedure in connection with the drawing-up of the list of safe countries of origin, and whereas the judgment which the Court of Justice will hand down on this issue is awaited with interest,
ker morajo imeti države članice na voljo kakovostne informacije o trenutnih nevarnostih v državah izvora, če naj zagotovijo zanesljivost in pravičnost postopkov, ki zagotavljajo spoštovanje pravic prosilcev za azil,
whereas the Member States must have high quality information about current dangers in countries of origin at their disposal if they are to guarantee reliable and fair procedures which ensure that asylum seekers" rights are respected,
ker se z nasiljem nad ženskam in grožnjami z nasiljem krši pravico do življenja, varnosti, svobode, dostojanstva in telesne in duševne integritete ter resno ogroža telesno in duševno zdravje žrtev,
whereas violence and the threat of violence against women constitute a breach of the right to life, safety, freedom, dignity and physical and emotional integrity, as well as being a serious threat to the physical and mental health of the victims of such violence,
ker je navkljub tehničnim in političnim težavam, ki ovirajo skupno uporabo občutljivih informacij o državah izvora, vzpostavitev skupne zbirke podatkov o državah izvora dolgoročno nujna, da se bodo lahko vse pristojne osebe pri obravnavi posameznih prošenj oprle na iste informacije,
whereas although there are technical and political problems which hamper the sharing of sensitive information about countries of origin, a joint database on countries of origin must surely ultimately be set up, so that all persons involved in the procedure can rely on the same information when dealing with an individual application,
ker je za izboljšanje postopkov odločanja treba povišati raven usposabljanja javnih uslužbencev, ki sprejemajo te odločitve,
whereas if decision-making procedures are to be improved the level of training of the civil servants who take the decisions will have to be raised,
ker je najprimernejši postopek, ki Sodišču omogoča zagotavljanje enotnosti prava Skupnosti, v členu 234 PES predvideni postopek za predhodno odločanje, in ker je pomemben del tega postopka tudi načelo, da lahko vsako nacionalno sodišče stopi v stik s Sodiščem; ker pa je na podlagi odstopanja od tega načela v skladu s členom 68 PES Sodišče na žalost pristojno za razlago določb na področju azila le takrat, kadar mu vprašanje predloži nacionalno sodišče zadnje stopnje,
whereas the procedure best suited to enabling the Court of Justice to guarantee the unity of Community law is the preliminary ruling procedure laid down in Article 234 of the EC Treaty, and whereas a key component of that procedure is the principle that any national court may ask the Court of Justice for a ruling; whereas, however, on the basis of the derogation from that principle laid down in Article 68 of the EC Treaty, the Court of Justice is unfortunately empowered to interpret asylum-related provisions only if consulted by the national court of final instance,
pozdravlja dosedanja prizadevanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema za izboljšanje sodelovanja v praksi; meni, da je izboljšanje kakovosti pri postopkih in odločitvah v interesu držav članic in prosilcev za azil;
Welcomes the efforts made to improve practical cooperation in the common European asylum system; considers that improving quality in procedures and decisions is in the interests of both the Member States and asylum-seekers;
obsoja očitno nezadostna sredstva, ki so na voljo Komisiji za spremljanje prenosa različnih direktiv s področja azila, in poziva države članice, naj Komisiji olajšajo njeno nalogo s sistematično predložitvijo ekvivalenčne tabele, v kateri je zapisano, s katerimi ukrepi so bile prenesene katere določbe teh direktiv;
Condemns the clearly inadequate resources available to the Commission to monitor the implementation of the various directives which deal with asylum-related matters, and urges the Member States to facilitate the Commission's task by systematically submitting to it a table of equivalences setting out exactly what measures have been taken to implement which provisions of those directives;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj si prizadevata za uvedbo enotnega postopka v vseh državah članicah, saj bo tako sprejemanje odločitev pravično in učinkovito, da se zagotovi odobritev statusa begunca čim prej vsem osebam, ki so do njega upravičene;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to work to bring about the introduction in all Member States of a single procedure which makes for fair and effective decision-making, in order to ensure that refugee status is granted as quickly as possible to all those who are entitled to it;
ugotavlja, da bodo z ozirom na pogoje in postopke za dodelitev mednarodne zaščite, zlasti pa subsidiarne zaščite, obstajale razlike med državami članicami in da bo trgovanje z vizumi ostalo problematično tako dolgo, dokler se bodo veljavne pravne določbe o področju azila opirale na minimalne standarde in najmanjši skupni imenovalec;
Points out, with regard to the conditions and procedures for granting international protection and, in particular, subsidiary protection, that as long as asylum-related legal provisions are based on minimum standards and on the lowest common denominator, differences between the Member States will continue to exist and 'asylum shopping' will remain an issue;
poudarja, da je eden od ciljev sprejetih inštrumentov, povezanih z azilom, omejiti t.i. "drugotna" gibanja; zato države članice poziva, naj si konkretno prizadevajo za čim večje zbliževanje svojih azilnih politik;
Emphasises that one of the objectives of the asylum-related instruments adopted is to curb so-called 'secondary' movements; therefore urges the Member States to take practical steps to achieve the highest possible degree of convergence among their respective asylum policies;
meni, da mora biti ena od izboljšav, ki jih je treba opraviti v evropskem azilnem sistemu, zavoljo večje solidarnosti tudi boljša razdelitev bremena zlasti med državami članicami, ki ležijo ob zunanjih mejah EU, in z zanimanjem pričakuje Komisijino presojo uredbe Dublin II in njene morebitne predloge na tem področju;
Takes the view that one of the improvements to be made to the EU asylum system should consist, for the sake of greater solidarity, in a fairer share of the burden carried in particular by those Member States at the external borders of the EU, and already awaits with interest the Commission's assessment of the Dublin II Regulation and any proposals it may make in this area;
meni, da je treba biti pozoren na dejstvo, da morajo biti javni uslužbenci, ki so pristojni za odločanje o dodelitvi statusa begunca, primerno usposobljeni na podlagi evropskega učnega načrta z možnostjo uvedbe obvezne kvalifikacije ali obvezne stopnje kvalifikacije;
Considers that due note should be taken of the fact that civil servants responsible for decisions granting refugee status must have proper training on the basis of a European curriculum, with the possibility of obligatory qualifications or an obligatory level of qualification being introduced;
poziva k izvajanju informacijskih kampanj v državah izvora in tranzita, ki morebitnim priseljencem pojasnjujejo tako tveganja pri nezakonitem priseljevanju, posledice nepriznavanja statusa begunca, možnosti zakonitega priseljevanja in možnost utemeljene prošnje za azil, kot tudi nevarnosti v zvezi s trgovanjem z ljudmi, zlasti ženskami in mladoletniki brez spremstva;
Calls for information campaigns to be carried out in countries of origin and transit with a view to making clear to potential migrants both the risks inherent in illegal immigration and the consequences of denial of refugee status, and the scope for legal migration and the possibility to apply for asylum in a justified case, as well as the dangers involved in trafficking in human beings, in particular women and unaccompanied minors;
poziva – potem ko so bila uporabljena vsa pravna sredstva – k pravičnemu in hitremu izvajanju ukrepov glede ljudi, ki jim ni bil dodeljen status begunca ali jim je bil ta status odvzet, ob polnem spoštovanju človekovega dostojanstva in temeljnih pravic oseb, ki jih je treba vrniti; nadalje s tem v zvezi poziva k čimprejšnji uvedbi postopka EU za vračanje;
Calls - once judicial remedies have been exhausted - for measures applicable to persons who have not been granted refugee status or whose refugee status has been revoked to be implemented quickly and fairly with full respect for the human dignity and fundamental rights of the persons who have to be repatriated; calls furthermore in this respect for the establishment in the shortest possible term of a EU repatriation procedure;
poziva k hitremu in pravičnemu izvajanju ukrepov glede oseb, ki jim je bil dodeljen status begunca ali humanitarna zaščita, da se lahko spodbudijo vzpostavitev primernih življenjskih razmer, učinkovita vključitev v družbeno in politično življenje ter skupna dejavna udeležba pri odločitvah, ki jih sprejme gostiteljska skupnost;
Calls for the measures applicable to persons who have been granted refugee status or humanitarian protection to be implemented quickly and fairly, in order that decent living conditions, effective integration in social and political life and shared active involvement in decisions taken by the host community may be fostered;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej odpravi tehnične in politične ovire pri uvedbi enotne zbirke podatkov o državah izvora; meni, da bi morala zbirka podatkov EU delovati kot odprt sistem, da se bodo lahko vse pristojne osebe pri obravnavi posameznih prošenj oprle na iste informacije; upa, da se bo za problem večjezičnosti našla praktična rešitev;
Calls on the Commission to overcome as quickly as possible the technical and political problems involved in introducing a joint database containing information about countries of origin; considers that an EU database should work as an open system, so that all persons involved in the procedure can rely on the same information when dealing with an individual application; hopes that a pragmatic solution can be found to the problem of multilingualism;
meni, da mora Komisija še naprej usklajevati dejavnosti, ki zadevajo sodelovanje v praksi na področju azila, za to pa ji morajo biti na razpolago primerna sredstva; poziva Komisijo, naj v poročilu o napredku pri prvem delu dejavnosti, ki ga bo predložila v začetku leta 2008, zagovarja to možnost, če pa bo izbrala drugo možnost, naj obrazloži, zakaj je potrebna ustanovitev nove strukture v obliki "evropske agencije za podporo", pri čimer bi bilo treba upoštevati razmerje med stroški in koristmi; meni, da bi morala biti Komisija strogo obvezana k vključitvi jamstev za preglednost in odgovornost, če predvideva ustanovitev evropske agencije za podporo;
Takes the view that coordinating activities in connection with practical cooperation on asylum-related matters must remain the task of the Commission, which must be provided with resources appropriate to that task; calls on the Commission to advocate that option in the report which it will submit in early 2008 concerning progress with the first phase of activities and, if it chooses another option, to justify why the establishment of a new structure in the form of a 'European Support Office' is considered necessary, whereas the cost-benefit ratio should be taken into account; takes the view that if the Commission envisages the creation of a European Support Office, it should be under a strict obligation to include guarantees of its transparency and accountability;
poziva države članice k polnemu sodelovanju z UNHCR, k ustrezni podpori tega organa in k uvedbi pobude "Quality Initiative" ter k objavi rezultatov te pobude, tako da bodo najboljše prakse pri obdelavi prošenj za mednarodno zaščito postale znane in da se bo spodbujala njihova raba;
Calls on the Member States to cooperate fully with UNHCR, to provide it with the appropriate support and to carry out a "Quality Initiative" exercise and publish the results of that initiative, so as to familiarise people with and encourage the use of best practices with regard to the processing of applications for international protection;
meni, da je namestitev prosilcev za azil v razmerah, v katerih jim je odvzeta osebna svoboda, nesprejemljiva;
Considers it unacceptable that asylum seekers should be held in conditions which deprive them of their individual freedom;
poudarja potrebo po vzpostavitvi sprejemnih centrov, ki bi imeli posebne strukture za družine, ženske in otroke ter ustrezne strukture za starejše in invalidne osebe, ki prosijo za azil; zahteva, da je potrebno v okviru izvajanja Direktive 2003/9/ES opraviti oceno o pogojih sprejema; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi bilo treba v polni meri izkoristiti možnosti, ki jih ponuja novi Evropski sklad za begunce;
Stresses the need to establish reception centres with separate facilities for families, women and children and suitable facilities for elderly and disabled asylum-seekers; calls for reception conditions to be assessed as part of measures implementing Directive 2003/9/EC; stresses, in this connection, the need for full use to be made of the opportunities afforded by the new European Refugee Fund;
poudarja, da je nadzor nad izvajanjem direktiv na področju azila naloga Komisije in da mora za ta namen imeti na voljo ustrezna sredstva, ki pa trenutno sploh ne zadoščajo za uspešno dokončanje tako obsežne naloge; meni, da je v igri verodostojnost Unije na tem področju in prihodnost enotne azilne politike;
Emphasises that it is the Commission's task to monitor the application of asylum-related directives and that the resources made available to it for this purpose currently fall well short of those needed to carry out such a comprehensive task successfully; takes the view that the credibility of the Union in this area and the future of the common asylum policy are at stake;
spodbuja Komisijo, da olajša dostop do finančnih instrumentov, kot sta Evropski sklad za begunce in program ARGO, ter tako omogoči državam članicam hiter dostop do finančnih sredstev v nujnih primerih;
Encourages the Commission to make it easier to access financial instruments such as the European Refugee Fund and the ARGO Programme so as to enable Member States to obtain funding swiftly in an emergency;
opozarja, da je treba zakonodajo Skupnosti na področju azilne politike enotno interpretirati in izvajati po vsej Uniji; meni, da bo usklajevanje na področju azilne politike lažje in hitrejše, če bodo Sodišču lahko predložila vprašanja tudi druga sodišča, ne pa samo nacionalna sodišča zadnje instance, kot velja sedaj; zato poziva Svet, naj Sodišču povrne vsa njegova pooblastila na področju predhodnega odločanja v skladu z naslovom IV Pogodbe ES; pozdravlja dokument Sodišča za razmislek o obravnavanju vprašanja za predhodno odločanje v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice Dokument Sveta 13272/06.
Points out that the body of Community law created in the area of asylum policy must be uniformly interpreted and applied throughout the Union; takes the view that harmonisation in the area of asylum policy will be facilitated and speeded up if the Court of Justice can in future be consulted by courts other than national courts of final instance, as is currently the case; calls on the Council, therefore, to restore to the Court of Justice its full powers in the area of preliminary rulings granted to it pursuant to Title IV of the EC Treaty; welcomes the Court of Justice Discussion Paper on the treatment of questions referred for a preliminary ruling concerning the area of freedom, security and justice Council Document 13272/06.
ter spodbuja razpravo o potrebi po določitvi postopka, prilagojenega posebnim značilnostim zadev na področju azila in priseljevanja;
and encourages discussion on the need for a procedure that is adapted to the specific nature of cases in the field of asylum and immigration;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. junija 2007 o zaupanju potrošnikov v digitalno okolje ( 2006/2048(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 21 June 2007 on consumer confidence in the digital environment ( 2006/2048(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije o pregledu pravnega reda o varstvu potrošnikov ( KOM(2006)0744 ) in Zbornika s primerjalno analizo potrošniške zakonodaje ES (EC Consumer Law Compendium – Comparative Analysis) http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/safe_shop/acquis/comp_analysis_en.pdf
having regard to the Commission Green Paper on the Review of the Consumer Acquis ( COM(2006)0744 ) and the EC Consumer Law Compendium – Comparative Analysis http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/cons_int/safe_shop/acquis/comp_analysis_en.pdf
ob upoštevanju javne obravnave, in izvedenskih raziskav, predstavljenih na njej, o zaupanju potrošnikov v digitalno okolje, ki je potekala v Evropskem parlamentu dne 24. januarja 2007,
having regard to the public hearing, and to the expert studies presented at that hearing, on consumer confidence in the digital environment, which took place at the European Parliament on 24 January 2007,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in zlasti členov 95 in 153 Pogodbe,
having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Articles 95 and 153 thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. marca 2006 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti: pot naprej UL C 292 E, 1.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 23 March 2006 on European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward OJ C 292 E, 1.12.2006, p.
in resolucije z dne 7. septembra 2006 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu, UL C 305 E, 14.12.2006, str.
and of 7 September 2006 on European contract law OJ C 305 E, 14.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju veljavne zakonodaje Skupnosti na področju varstva potrošnikov, e-poslovanja in razvoja informacijske družbe,
having regard to current Community legislation in the area of consumer protection, e-commerce and the development of the information society,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o boju proti neželeni elektronski pošti ter vohunski in zlonamerni programski opremi ( KOM(2006)0688 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on fighting spam, spyware and malicious software ( COM(2006)0688 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o pregledu regulativnega okvira EU za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve ( KOM(2006)0334 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on the Review of the EU Regulatory Framework for electronic communications networks and services ( COM(2006)0334 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0191/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0191/2007 ),
ker je digitalna tehnologija del vsakdanjega življenja, industrija informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij (IKT) ima pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju platform, naprav, programske opreme, informacijskih storitev, komunikacije, zabave in kulturnih dobrin, meja med blagom in storitvami postaja vse bolj nejasna, združujejo se različne oblike IKT, vse več je različnih načinov nakupovanja, potrošniki pa vse pogosteje oblikujejo vsebino izdelkov ali prispevajo k njihovi dodani vrednosti; poleg tega je v tej novi in zapleteni strukturi vse težje opredeliti, kdo zagotavlja določen del storitve, in razumeti učinek posebnih tehnologij ter novih poslovnih modelov;
whereas digital technology is a part of everyday life, the information and communication technology (ICT) industry plays a major role in providing platforms, devices, software, information services, communication, entertainment, and cultural goods, the boundary between goods and services is becoming blurred, various forms of ICT are converging, methods of purchase are diversifying and consumers are increasingly generating content for or adding value to products; whereas, moreover, in this complex new structure, it is increasingly difficult to identify who is providing a particular part of a service and to understand the impact of specific technology and new business models,