natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij: eEvropa 2002 – Merila kakovosti na spletnih straneh, ki se nanašajo na zdravstveno varstvo (KOM(2002)0667),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - eEurope 2002: Quality Criteria for Health related Websites ( COM(2002)0667 ),
ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti ("Sodišča") v primerih Decker (C-120/95, 28. april 1998), Kohll (C-158/96, 28. april 1998), Geraets-Smits & Peerbooms (C-157/99, 12. julij 2001), IKA (C-326/00, 25. februar 2003) ter Müller-Fauré & van Riet (C-385/99, 13. maj 2003),
having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities ("European Court of Justice") in Decker (C-120/95, 28 April 1998), Kohll (C-158/96, 28 April 1998), Geraets-Smits & Peerbooms (C-157/99, 12 July 2001), IKA (C-326/00, 25 February 2003) and Müller-Fauré & van Riet (C-385/99, 13 May 2003),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij (KOM(2002)0119),
having regard to the Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications ( COM(2002)0119 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o storitvah na notranjem trgu (KOM(2004)0002),
having regard to the Commission Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market ( COM(2004)0002 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. januarja 2003 o prihodnosti zdravstvenega varstva in oskrbe starejših UL C 38 E, 12.2.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2003 on the future of health care and care for the elderly OJ C 38 E, 12.2.2004, p.
ter svoje resolucije z dne 11. marca 2004 o zdravstvenem varstvu in oskrbi starejših UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
and its resolution of 11 March 2004 on health care and care for the elderly OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ( A6-0129/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0129/2005 ),
ker se je z razvojem medicine, tehnologije, e-zdravja, ozaveščenosti bolnikov in z zakonodajo zdravstveno varstvo EU spremenilo,
whereas healthcare in the EU is being transformed by developments in medicine, technology, e-health, patient awareness and law,
ker je sistem E111 za nepredvideno zdravljenje med začasnim bivanjem v drugi državi članici nadomestila evropska kartica zdravstvenega zavarovanja in ker je treba nadomestiti, ali znatno spremeniti birokratski in omejevalni sistem E112 za predvideno zdravljenje v drugi državi članici,
whereas the E111 system for unplanned health treatment when temporarily in another Member State is being superseded by the European Health Card, and whereas there is a need to replace, or significantly change, the bureaucratic and restrictive E112 system for planned health treatment in another Member State,
ker preprečevanje predstavlja ključen element celovite zdravstvene politike in sistematski preventivni ukrepi podaljšajo življenjsko dobo, omilijo razlike med socialnimi skupinami v zvezi s čakalnimi dobami v sistemu zdravstvenega varstva in ustavljajo širitev kroničnih bolezni, kar omogoča zmanjšanje stroškov zdravljenja,
whereas prevention represents a key element of a comprehensive health policy and systematic preventive measures increase life expectancy, lessen discrepancies between social groups in terms of waiting times in the healthcare system and stop the spread of chronic illnesses, thereby allowing reductions in treatment costs,
ker je evropska zdravstvena politika spodbujena z odločbami Sodišča o mobilnosti bolnikov in ker bo zaradi postopka širitve Sodišče ES obravnavalo še bolj zapletene primere in ker je v interesu bolnikov in vlad, da se nemudoma sprejme in uveljavi dogovor o jasni usmeritvi politike in postopkov,
whereas European health policy is being driven in a piecemeal fashion by European Court of Justice rulings on patient mobility, and the process of enlargement will bring even more complex cases for the European Court of Justice to deal with; whereas it is in both patients' and governments' interests that clear guidance on policy and procedures should be agreed and put in place without delay,
ker je glavna odgovornost za organizacijo, financiranje ter zagotavljanje zdravstvenih storitev in zdravstvenega varstva v pristojnosti držav članic, Evropska unija pa je odgovorna za področje javnega zdravja, promocijo zdravja, raziskovanje in zgodnje odkrivanje ter za čezmejno mobilnost,
whereas primary responsibility for the organisation, financing and delivery of health services and medical care lies with the Member States, while the European Union has a responsibility in the fields of public health, health promotion, research and early detection and a role in cross-border mobility,
ker je potrebna večja jasnost, da bodo bolniki, strokovnjaki zdravstvenega varstva ter plačniki in zavarovatelji v zdravstvenem varstvu razumeli čezmejno in nadnacionalno zdravstveno varstvo in bili vključeni vanj,
whereas further clarity is needed to enable patients, healthcare professionals and health budget holders and insurers to understand and participate in cross-border and transnational healthcare,
ker so pri preskrbi z zdravstvenim varstvom, ustrezni, varni in dostopni mobilnosti bolnikov v EU pomembni logistični, upravni, kulturni in klinični izzivi,
whereas there are significant logistical, administrative, cultural and clinical challenges in delivering a consistent, safe and accessible patient mobility framework for the EU,
ker sistemi zdravstvenega varstva v Uniji zagotavljajo ustrezno visokokakovostno oskrbo v primeru bolezni vsem osebam, ne glede na njihove prihodke, premoženje in starost, in temeljijo na načelih solidarnosti, enakosti in univerzalnosti,
whereas healthcare systems in the Union are founded on the principles of solidarity, equity and universality, in order to guarantee that all persons, regardless of their income, wealth and age, receive appropriate, high-quality care in the event of sickness,
ker je zaradi različnih nacionalnih sistemov zdravstvenega varstva in tradicij mobilnost bolnikov zapleteno vprašanje; ker to vseeno ne sme preprečiti prizadevanj za reševanje težav z usklajenostjo in učinkovitostjo, s katerimi se srečujejo uporabniki, ter prizadevanj za izboljšanje storitev,
whereas patient mobility is a complex issue owing to differences in national healthcare systems and traditions; whereas, however, this should not prevent efforts being made to resolve coordination and efficiency problems facing users and to improve services,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o mobilnosti bolnikov in idejah, ki jih poudarja za strukturno sodelovanje v zdravstvenem varstvu;
Welcomes the Commission communication on patient mobility and the ideas it outlines for structuring cooperation in healthcare;
verjame, da mora biti nadaljnje sodelovanje med državami članicami, ki ga, kjer je to potrebno, usklajuje Komisija, usmerjeno v posebne teme v zvezi s čezmejnim zdravstvenim varstvom; meni, da je treba posvečati posebno pozornost vidikom regionalnega sodelovanja, ustrezno je treba upoštevati tudi izkušnje, pridobljene v obmejnih regijah; meni, da je mogoče poiskati rešitve, prilagojene posebnim regijam, ki ustrezajo potrebam ljudi in da se praktične izkušnje lahko uporabijo kot vzorci najboljše prakse;
Believes that further cooperation between the Member States, coordinated by the Commission where appropriate, should concentrate on the specific issues related to cross-border health care; believes that, at the same time, particular attention should be paid to aspects of regional cooperation, and that the experiences gained in border regions should be taken into account appropriately; considers that in this way, solutions tailored to specific regions can be sought to meet people's needs and that practical experiences can be used in the form of best practice models;
meni, da je za zadeve mobilnosti bolnikov potreben ločen predlog Komisije in da bi se direktiva o storitvah morala bolj osredotočiti na storitve mobilnosti kot na mobilnost bolnikov, vendar pa bi morala vključevati poziv Komisiji, da pripravi predlog o mobilnosti bolnikov v šestih mesecih od začetka veljavnosti tega ukrepa; nadalje meni, da bi ta predlog moral temeljiti na delu skupine visoki ravni in obravnavati zlasti okvir za navodila bolnikom, zdravstvenim strokovnjakom in upravljavcem zdravstvenega proračuna ter predloge za posredovanje informacij bolnikom, varstvo bolnikov in zaupnost;
Believes that the issue of patient mobility needs a separate Commission proposal and that the Services Directive should concentrate on service mobility rather than patient mobility, but that the Services Directive should incorporate a call to the Commission to bring forward a proposal on patient mobility within six months of that measure entering into force; further believes that this proposal should be based on the work of the High Level Group on Health Services and Medical Care and should address in particular a framework for guidance to patients, health professionals and health budget managers and proposals to cover information to patients and patient security and confidentiality;
obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije o mobilnosti bolnikov ne vsebuje časovnega razporeda dejavnosti in se ne zavzema za integrirano politiko v zvezi z mobilnostjo bolnikov;
Regrets that the Commission communication on patient mobility does not provide a timetable for action and does not make any commitment to an integrated policy on patient mobility;
meni, da je odprta metoda usklajevanja primeren okvir za obravnavanje zadev v zvezi z mobilnostjo bolnikov brez hkratnega izključevanja sodelovanja med državami v zvezi z zadevami, za katere so odgovorne zdravstvene službe držav članic;
Considers that the open method of coordination is an appropriate framework for dealing with patient mobility issues, without simultaneously excluding cooperation between States on matters for which Member States' health services are responsible;
meni, da morajo smernice vsebovati postopke za dostop do zdravljenja, vire informacij o strokovnjakih zdravstvenega varstva in zmogljivostih zdravstvenega varstva, mehanizme plačevanja zdravstvenega varstva, navodila za potovanje in jezikovno podporo, navodila za nadaljevanje zdravljenja, spremljanje, rekonvalescenco in rehabilitacijo pred ali po povračilu, pritožbe in druge s tem povezane postopke ter posebno oskrbo starejših in upokojencev; opozarja, da morajo biti mehanizmi plačila za oskrbo enotni in nepristranski, da ne pride do neenakosti in slabšega položaja za nekatere bolnike;
Believes that guidelines should include procedures to obtain treatment, sources of information about health professionals and healthcare facilities, mechanisms for paying for care, arrangements for travel and linguistic support, arrangements for continuing care, follow-up, convalescence and rehabilitation prior to or after return, complaints and other related procedures and special care for the elderly and pensioners; points out that mechanisms of payment for care should be uniform and impartial so as to avoid inequalities and the creation of disadvantages to certain patients;
meni, da je nujno spodbujati čezmejno sodelovanje za omogočanje učinkovitega ali nujnega zdravljenja, še zlasti ob nujnih primerih, kroničnih obolenjih in resnih boleznih ali alergijah;
Considers it essential to promote cross-border cooperation in order to provide effective or urgent treatment, primarily in the case of emergencies, chronic disease, and serious illness or allergy;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o razširitvi "odprte metode usklajevanja" na zdravstveno varstvo in dolgoročno varstvo, kot tudi spremljanje z namenom zagotavljanja mehanizma strukturnega sodelovanja med državami članicami s specifičnimi cilji in rednimi preverjanji;
Welcomes the Commission communication on extending the "open method of coordination" to healthcare and long-term care and looks forward to follow-up work to provide a mechanism for structuring cooperation between Member States with specific objectives and regular reviews;
poziva k celotnemu znanstvenemu pristopu, ki je namenjen izgradnji postopka odprte metode usklajevanja na najboljši možen način; meni, da to zahteva združljivost podatkov po celi Evropi, pa tudi osrednji kazalec na metaravni in da je treba raziskati, do kolikšne mere je mogoče vključiti doslej dostopne podatke;
Calls for an overall scientific approach aimed at structuring the process of the open method of coordination in the best possible way; considers that this requires Europe-wide data compatibility as well as a central metalevel index, and that it should be investigated to what extent the data already available can be integrated;
pozdravlja načrt dela Generalnega direktorata za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov Komisije za leto 2005 pod okriljem okvirnega programa javnega zdravja, ki vključuje pilotske predloge za čezmejno sodelovanje na področju zdravstvenih storitev, kar pomaga pri razvoju sodelovanja in prepoznavanja morebitnih koristi in težav v zvezi s takim sodelovanjem;
Welcomes the 2005 workplan of the Commission's Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, established under the Public Health Framework Programme which includes pilot proposals for cross-border co-operation in health services, to help develop cooperation and to identify potential benefits and problems associated with such cooperation;
meni, da premajhen napredek pri informiranju bolnikov resno ogroža razvoj zdravstvenega varstva v EU in še zlasti doseganje mobilnosti bolnikov; poziva Svet in Komisijo, da nujno predložita okvir za vsakodnevno informiranje bolnikov;
Considers the lack of progress on patient information as a serious threat to the development of healthcare in the EU and in particular to the attainment of patient mobility; calls upon the Commission and the Council urgently to bring forward a framework for everyday patient information;
kritizira dejstvo, da usklajevanje pogledov na pravice in dolžnosti bolnikov – kar priporoča postopek presoje – še ni izvedeno, ter poziva Svet in Komisijo, da to nemudoma storita; poziva države članice, da sprejmejo zakon ali listino o bolnikih, ki bolnikom med drugim zagotavlja naslednje pravice:
Criticises the fact that a coordination of the views of the rights and duties of patients – as recommended by the Reflection Process – has not yet been carried out, and calls on the Council and the Commission to do so without delay; calls on the Member States to adopt a patients" law or patients" charter in which patients are granted, among others, the following rights:
pravico do ustrezne in strokovne zdravstvene oskrbe, ki jo ponuja usposobljeno zdravniško osebje,
the right to appropriate and qualified medical care provided by qualified medical staff,
pravico do samoodločanja na podlagi celotnih podatkov,
the right to self-determination based on full information,
pravico do evidenc zdravljenja in njihovega pregleda,
the right to treatment records and to inspection thereof,
pravico do zaupnosti in varovanja podatkov,
the right to confidentiality and data protection,
pravico do vložitve pritožbe,
the right to make a complaint,
zagotovilo, da se opazovanja in zdravniški preizkusi ne izvajajo brez predhodnega dovoljenja bolnika;
the guarantee that no observation or medical experiments will be carried out without prior patient consent;
ocenjuje, da čeprav so države članice na dobri poti k razvoju jasnih nacionalnih smernic za bolnike, ki ustrezajo njihovim nacionalnim sistemom zdravstvenega varstva; to Komisiji ne sme preprečiti vzpostavljanja skupnih bistvenih elementov informiranja bolnikov, sestavljanja vodiča po zdravstvenih storitvah ter določanja pravic in dolžnosti bolnikov, zajetega zdravljenja in podrobnosti povračila;
Believes that although Member States are better placed to develop clear national patient information guidance relevant to their national health systems this should not prevent the Commission from establishing common core elements on patient information, drawing up a guide to health services and setting out the rights and duties of patients, the treatment covered and reimbursement details;
poziva Komisijo, da ob upoštevanju nacionalnih predpisov obravnava usklajevanje postopkov v zvezi s povračilom stroškov, kakor je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 883/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti UL L 166, 30.4.2004, str.
Calls on the Commission to consider, while respecting national rules, harmonisation of the procedures with regard to reimbursement of costs, as established by Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 631/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 100, 6.4.2004, str.
Regulation last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 631/2004 (OJ L 100, 6.4.2004, P.7).
poziva Komisijo, da do 1. januarja 2007 izdela skupino smernic za ključne zadeve v zvezi z mobilnostjo bolnikov; meni, da morajo te biti podprte z nacionalnimi smernicami, ki jih izdelajo države članice v nadaljnjih 12 mesecih;
Calls upon the Commission to produce a set of guidelines on core patient mobility issues by 1 January 2007; believes that these should be supported by national guidelines produced by Member States within a further 12 months;
meni, da je treba v zvezi z mobilnostjo bolnikov prednost dati sprejetju smernic v zvezi z dostopom do zdravljenja, ki ni na voljo v državi članici, katere državljan je bolnik, in zdravljenja, ki je nujno, ampak ni nemudoma na voljo v državi članici izvora bolnika;
Considers that priority should be given, in the context of patient mobility, to adopting guidelines concerning access to treatments which do not exist in the patient's Member State of origin and treatments for which there is an urgent need but no possibility of immediate availability in the patient's Member State of origin;
meni, da je ključnega pomena, da države članice sprejmejo pravila za predpisovanje, izdajanje predpisanih navodil in povračila plačil, ki jih bolniki za zdravila plačajo v drugi državi članici za nadaljnje olajšanje mobilnosti bolnikov med državami članicami;
Considers it essential that Member States adopt rules on prescribing, the carrying out of prescription orders, and the reimbursement of payments made for drugs by patients in another Member State with a view to further facilitating patient mobility between Member States;
spodbuja Komisijo, da določi roke zbiranja in vrednotenja podatkov o obstoječem čezmejnem gibanju bolnikov in jo poziva, da ugotovitve takih študij čim prej objavi; ponovno poudarja pomen vrednotenja in izmenjave izkušenj, pridobljenih pri čezmejnih sporazumih, kot so projekti evroregij;
Encourages the Commission to set deadlines for the collection and evaluation of data on existing cross-border movement of patients and calls on the Commission to make the findings of such studies known as soon as possible; reiterates the value of evaluating and sharing the experience of cross-border agreements such as the Euregio projects;
poziva Komisijo, da pripravi poročilo o vrsti in razširjenosti zdravstvenega turizma ter o tem, v kakšnem obsegu povrne sedaj stroške državna zavarovalnica, v kakšnem obsegu zasebni zavarovalniški sektor ter koliko plača bolnik iz žepa;
Calls for a report from the Commission on the nature and prevalence of health tourism and the extent to which it is currently reimbursed by statutory agencies and by the private insurance sector or paid out of pocket;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da do junija 2007 sestavijo poročilo o obsegu mobilnosti bolnikov in storitvah, ki jih prejemajo obiskovalci in rezidenti v javnem in zasebnem sektorju;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to draw up a report by June 2007 on the extent of patient mobility and the services received by visitors and residents in both the public and private sectors;
poziva države članice, da pravočasno predstavijo ustanovitev jasnega in preglednega okvira za nakup čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva, napovedanega za to leto kot del skupine na visoki ravni;
Calls on the Member States to present in good time a clear and transparent framework for cross-border healthcare purchasing as announced for this year by the High-Level Group;
močno podpira prizadevanja za izboljšanje znanja in zakonodajo o gibanju strokovnjakov zdravstvenega in socialnega varstva; opominja Komisijo, da morajo biti v Direktivo o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij vključeni učinkoviti mehanizmi za podporo visoke ravni varnosti bolnika;
Strongly endorses efforts to improve knowledge and legislation on the movement of health and social care professionals; reminds the Commission that effective mechanisms to support high levels of patient safety must be incorporated in the Directive on the recognition of professional qualifications;
priznava, da je bilo delo pri vzpostavljanju registra zdravnikov in drugih strokovnjakov zdravstvenega varstva in nege v EU prekinjeno ali ustavljeno zaradi nesposobnosti ali neprimerne prakse; verjame, da mora biti to na voljo bolnikom in kupcem zdravstvenih storitev; in od Komisije zahteva redna poročila o napredku;
Recognises the work being undertaken to establish an EU-wide register of doctors and other health and care professionals suspended or struck off for incompetence or malpractice; believes that this should be accessible to patients and health purchasers; and requests regular progress reports from the Commission;
opozarja na možno tveganje "bega možganov" iz novih držav članic v države, ki nudijo višje plače, kar bi posledično ogrozilo zmogljivosti in standarde njihovih sistemov zdravstvenega varstva; zato spodbuja raziskave mogočih posledic povečane mobilnosti bolnikov na take premike in raziskave prihodnjega povpraševanja po strokovnjakih zdravstvenega varstva in ponudbe visokošolskih sistemov v EU;
Highlights the potential risk of a 'brain drain' from the new Member States to those offering higher salaries, with a subsequent threat to the capacity and standard of their healthcare systems; therefore encourages research into possible impacts of increased patient mobility on such movements, and research into the future demand for healthcare professionals and their supply through EU higher education systems;
poudarja, da prost pretok bolnikov pomeni spodbudo tudi za nacionalne zdravstvene storitve, da ustrezajo najvišjim možnim standardom in z visokokakovostnimi storitvami spodbujajo bolnike, da ne poiščejo enakega zdravljenja v tujini;
Emphasises that the free movement of patients constitutes an incentive also for national healthcare services to meet the highest possible standards and to encourage patients not to take the same treatment abroad by providing high-quality services;