natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja pomen dostopa proizvodnih industrij do trga; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s prizadevanji za sodelovanje s prizadetimi sektorji, da razkrije mednarodne prakse, zlasti predpise in subvencije, ki negativno vplivajo na konkurenčnost evropskih podjetij, in odpravi ovire za trgovino in naložbe, ki niso v skladu z mednarodnimi pravili; meni, da so dvostranski sporazumi izjemna priložnost za premagovanje teh izzivov na pravičen, pregleden in napreden način ter za določitev načela vzajemnosti za splošno pravilo trgovinskih odnosov Unije;
Stresses the importance of market access for the manufacturing industries; urges the Commission to continue its efforts, working in tandem with the sectors affected, to identify international practices which can adversely affect the competitiveness of European undertakings, particularly regulations and subsidies, and tackle barriers to trade and investment that are in breach of international rules; sees in bilateral agreements a good opportunity to overcome these challenges in a fair, transparent and forward-thinking manner and hence to make the principle of reciprocity the general rule in the Union's trading relations;
poudarja, da bi morala zakonodaja, ki si prizadeva vključiti okoljska vprašanja v gospodarsko politiko in strategije, državam članicam pustiti določeno stopnjo svobode pri izbiri gospodarskih in finančnih instrumentov;
Stresses that legislation seeking to include environmental matters in economic policies and strategies should allow the Member States scope for flexibility in the choice of economic and financial instruments;
meni, da je treba pri ukrepih, ki bodo sprejeti, zlasti v okviru STO, upoštevati okoliščine in posebne značilnosti vsakega sektorja, priložnosti in izzive, ki se pojavljajo, ter težave, s katerimi se soočajo posamezne države članice;
Believes that, as regards the measures to be taken, especially in the WTO, it is necessary to allow for the context obtaining in, and the specific characteristics of, each sector, the opportunities and challenges that may arise, and the difficulties posed for individual Member States;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj sledijo ciljem trajnostnega razvoja z ustvarjanjem primernega ravnovesja med gospodarskimi, socialnimi in okoljskimi vidiki;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to pursue sustainable development objectives by bringing economic, social, and environmental aspects into an even balance;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Direktive Sveta o spremembi Direktive 77/388/EGS v zvezi z nekaterimi ukrepi za poenostavitev postopka za računanje davka na dodano vrednost in za pomoč pri preprečevanju utaje in izogibanja davkom, ter o preklicu nekaterih odločb o dovoljenju odstopanj ( KOM(2005)0089 – C6-0100/2005 – 2005/0019(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 77/388/EEC as regards certain measures to simplify the procedure for charging value added tax and to assist in countering tax evasion and avoidance, and repealing certain Decisions granting derogations ( COM(2005)0089 – C6-0100/2005 – 2005/0019(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0089 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0089 ) Not yet published in the OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 93 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0100/2005 ),
having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0100/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0209/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0209/2006 ),
(1a) Da se Skupnosti zaščiti pred finančno škodo na področju davka na dodano vrednost, zlasti škodo, ki nastane zaradi goljufivih ali drugih nezakonitih čezmejnih dejavnosti, k čemur so se države članice zavezale na podlagi člena 280 Pogodbe,bi morale države članice tesno sodelovati z Evropskim uradom za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF).
(1a) To protect the Community against damage to its financial interests in relation to value added tax, and in particular against losses resulting from fraudulent or other illegal cross-border activities, as the Member States have committed themselves to do pursuant to Article 280 of the Treaty, Member States should cooperate closely with the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF).
Sprememba 2 UVODNA IZJAVA 9 A (novo)
Amendment 2 RECITAL 9 A (new)
(9a) Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v davčna pristojnost držav članic za odmero davkov.
(9a) This Directive should not encroach on the power of the Member States to levy taxes.
Sprememba 3 UVODNA IZJAVA 9 B (novo)
Amendment 3 RECITAL 9 B (new)
(9b) Racionalizacija odstopanj bi morala biti ob učinkovitem preprečevanju davčnih utaj in izogibanja davkom le manjši del obširnega programa reforme ureditve o davku na dodano vrednost v Skupnosti in bi bilo zato treba uvesti dodatne reforme ureditve davka na dodatno vrednost, med drugim s ciljem preprečevanja davčnih goljufij, za posodobitev in poenostavitev, na primer finančnih storitev, e-storitev, dvojnega obdavčevanja in javnih storitev.
(9b) In order to counter tax evasion and avoidance effectively, the streamlining of derogations should be only a limited component of a comprehensive programme to reform the Community's value added tax regime, and, thus, further reforms of the regime should be undertaken, aimed, inter alia, at combating tax fraud, with a view to modernising and simplifying, for example, financial services, e-services, double taxation situations, and public services.
Sprememba 4 UVODNA IZJAVA 9 C (novo)
Amendment 4 RECITAL 9 C (new)
(9c) Merila, ki jih je treba upoštevati v primeru kakršnih koli sprememb sistema pobiranja davka na dodano vrednost, so učinkovitost pobiranja davkov, enakost davčne obravnave in izvedljivost v poslovanju podjetij.
(9c) The criteria for consideration in any change in the system for levying value added tax should be the effectiveness of tax collection, equality in tax treatment, and practicability for businesses.
Sprememba 5 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 1 Člen 4, odstavek 4 (Direktiva 77/388/EGS)
Amendment 5 ARTICLE 1, POINT 1 Article 4, paragraph 4 (Directive 77/388/EEC)
Členu 4(4) se doda naslednji pododstavek:
In Article 4(4), the following subparagraph is added:
"Ko država članica uporabi možnost, zagotovljeno v drugem pododstavku, mora zagotoviti, da uporaba te možnosti ne ustvari neupravičene koristi ali neupravičene škode za davčne zavezance."
"Where a Member State exercises the option provided for in the second subparagraph, it shall ensure that the application of this option creates neither unjustifiable benefit nor unjustified disadvantage for taxable persons."
Sprememba 6 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2 Člen 5, odstavek 8, drugi stavek (Direktiva 77/388/EGS)
Amendment 6 ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 Article 5, paragraph 8, second sentence (Directive 77/388/EEC)
Drugi stavek v členu 5(8) se zamenja z naslednjim:
In Article 5(8) the second sentence is replaced by the following:
"Ko je to ustrezno in če prejemnik ni dolžan plačevati polnega davka, lahko države članice sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za preprečevanje izkrivljanja konkurence.
"Where appropriate, Member States may, in cases where the recipient is not wholly liable to tax, take the necessary measures to prevent distortion of competition.
Države članice zagotovijo, da se ne dodeli nobena neupravičena korist ali škoda."
They shall ensure that there is no unjustifiable benefit or unjustified disadvantage conferred."
Sprememba 7 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 A (novo) Člen 21, odstavek 2, točka (c a) (novo) (Direktiva 77/388/EGS)
Amendment 7 ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 A (new) Article 21, paragraph 2, point (c a) (new) (Directive 77/388/EEC)
(7a) V členu 21(2), v različici iz člena 28g, se doda točka (ca):
(7a) In Article 21(2), in the version set out in Article 28g, the following point (ca) shall be added:
"(ca) Razmejitev teh storitev, za katere prejemnik, ki je davčni zavezanec, dolguje davek, od drugih storitev, za katere dobavitelj storitev kot doslej dolguje davke, mora biti za podjetja jasna in nesporno razpoznavna ter obvladljiva."
"(ca) The distinction between those services in respect of which the taxable recipient is liable to pay tax and other services in respect of which, to date, the enterprise providing the service is liable to pay tax, must be clearly and indisputably recognisable to, and ascertainable by, enterprises."
Sprememba 8 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 B (novo) Člen 30 a (novo) (Direktiva 77/388/EGS)
Amendment 8 ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 B (new) Article 30 a (new) (Directive 77/388/EEC)
"Člen 30a
"Article 30a
Da bi preprečili čezmejne davčne goljufije, ki škoduje finančnim interesom Skupnosti, še zlasti davčne goljufije v obliki davčnega vrtiljaka, države članice pozivajo svoje pristojne organe, da v primeru suma goljufije na tem področju tesno sodelujejo z OLAF-om.
In order to counter cross-border value added tax fraud, affecting the Community's financial interests, and in particular so-called carousel fraud, Member States shall call upon their competent authorities to cooperate closely with the OLAF where fraud is suspected.
Sprememba 9 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 7 C (novo) Člen 34 a (novo) (Direktiva 77/388/EGS)
Amendment 9 ARTICLE 1, POINT 7 C (new) Article 34 a (new) (Directive 77/388/EEC)
(7c) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(7c) The following Article shall be inserted:
"Člen 34a
"Article 34a
Za opredelitev najboljše dolgoročne ureditve pobiranja davka na dodano vrednost v Evropski uniji Komisija pripravi obširen primerjalen povzetek, v okviru katerega oceni nacionalna stališča o tem področju in nazorno navede različne posledice, povezane s prehodom na model obrnjene davčne obveznosti, ter prednosti in slabosti za države članice in podjetja, dejavna v Skupnosti."
To determine the best long-term value added tax collection arrangements for the European Union, the Commission shall draw up a comprehensive comparative synopsis, assessing national thinking on the subject and specifying the many and varied consequences of changing the system to the reverse-charge model and the advantages and disadvantages for the Member States and businesses operating in the Community."
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o partnerstvu EU in Karibov za rast, stabilnost in razvoj ( 2006/2123(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the EU-Caribbean partnership for growth, stability and development ( 2006/2123(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru z dne 2. marca 2006 z naslovom "Partnerstvo EU in Karibov za rast, stabilnost in razvoj" ( KOM(2006)0086 ) (v nadaljevanju "sporočilo Komisije"),
having regard to the Communication of 2 March 2006 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee entitled 'An EU-Caribbean Partnership for Growth, Stability and Development' ( COM(2006)0086 ) (hereinafter the "Commission Communication"),
ob upoštevanju ocenjevalnega poročila o regionalni strategiji Komisije za Karibe, zvezka 1 in 2 iz aprila 2005,
having regard to the evaluation of the Commission's regional strategy for the Caribbean, Volumes 1 and 2, of April 2005,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanji odnose z dne 10. aprila 2006, ki vključujejo potrditev skupnega stališča o Kubi z dne 2. decembra 1996,
having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council of 10 April 2006, which include a confirmation of the Common Position on Cuba of 2 December 1996,
ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic v okviru Sveta ter Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije o razvojni politiki Evropske unije z naslovom "Evropsko soglasje" UL C 46, 24.2.2006, str.
having regard to the Joint statement by the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission on European Union Development Policy: 'The European Consensus' OJ C 46, 24.2.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Dunajske izjave o tretjem forumu civilne družbe Evrope, Latinske Amerike in Karibov z dne 1. aprila 2006,
having regard to the Vienna Declaration of the Third European-Latin American-Caribbean Civil Society Forum of 1 April 2006,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0211/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Development ( A6-0211/2006 ),
ker bo veliko karibskih držav do leta 2020 doseglo status razvitih držav, medtem ko drugim grozi, da bodo zdrsnile iz skupine držav s srednjimi prihodki v skupino držav z nizkimi prihodki,
whereas by 2020 some Caribbean States will have achieved developed country status, whilst others face a drop from the category of middle-income countries to that of low-income countries,
ker so te male otoške države po naravi občutljive za naravne nesreče in druge zunanje pretrese,
whereas these small island States have an inherent vulnerability to natural disasters and other external shocks,
ker so Komisija in predstavniki CARIFORUM Karibski forum afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (države AKP).
whereas a dialogue has taken place between the Commission and representatives of CARIFORUM The Forum of the Caribbean States of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States.
razpravljali o sporočilu Komisije, ko je bilo na stopnji osnutka,
on the Commission Communication when it was in draft form,
ker je vzpostavitev skupnega karibskega enotnega trga in gospodarstva (CSME) po lastni odločitvi pomemben instrument regionalnega povezovanja,
whereas the establishment, on the basis of self-determination, of the Caribbean Single Market and Economy (CSME) represents an important instrument for regional integration,
ker so države CARIFORUM želele, da pogajanja o sporazumu o gospodarskem partnerstvu vključujejo jasno razvojnopolitično razsežnost, da bi se preprečevali naraščajoča revščina in neenakost, spodbujala socialna kohezija in uresničevali razvojni cilji novega tisočletja,
whereas the CARIFORUM States wanted the EPA negotiations to incorporate a clear development policy dimension with a view to combating increasing poverty and inequality, fostering social cohesion and achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs),
ker je več kot 60 % prebivalstva v regiji mlajšega od 30 let in je v karibskih državah razen Kube dostop do izobraževanja za vse nerešen problem,
whereas over 60% of the region's population is under 30 years of age, and whereas universal access to education is an unresolved problem for all Caribbean States, with the exception of Cuba,
ker je belgijska vlada pozitivno ocenila odločilen dialog in razvojno sodelovanje s kubansko vlado,
whereas the Belgian Government has made a positive assessment of the critical dialogue and development cooperation with the Cuban Government,
ker se je začela programska stopnja za sredstva desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada in mora biti izplačilo teh sredstev v prihodnje hitrejše in učinkovitejše ter bolje prilagojeno potrebam držav regije,
whereas the programming phase for appropriations under the 10th European Development Fund has started, and whereas this aid should in future be disbursed more quickly and more efficiently and should be better tailored to the needs of the countries in the region,
izreka pohvalo vključitvi skupine CARIFORUM v razpravo o osnutku sporočila Komisije in pozdravlja upoštevanje večine pomislekov držav iz regije v sporočilu;
Applauds the involvement of the CARIFORUM Group in the discussions on the draft Commission Communication and welcomes the fact that the communication has taken account of most of the concerns raised by the States in the region;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije v strategiji, ki spodbuja duh enakosti, partnerstva in pripadnosti;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has based its strategy on the ethos of equality, partnership and ownership;
meni, da je dejanska marginalizacija Parlamenta s časovnim razporedom, ki izključuje udeležbo Parlamenta pri oblikovanju strategije sodelovanja za Karibe, zelo obžalovanja vredna sprememba načina delovanja treh evropskih institucij s soglasjem, ki se je že izkazalo pri oblikovanju strategije za Afriko in v evropskem soglasju o razvojni politiki Evropske unije;
Regards Parliament's de facto marginalisation by means of a timetable which ruled out its involvement in the drafting of the cooperation strategy for the Caribbean as an exceptionally regrettable departure from the consensual approach employed by the three European institutions, an approach which had proved its worth in connection with the drafting of the Africa Strategy and the European Consensus on the European Union's development policy;
obžaluje, da Komisija nezadostno upošteva priporočila iz svojega ocenjevalnega poročila;
Deplores the Commission's failure to take proper account of the recommendations made in its evaluation report;
se strinja z analizo Komisije, da sodelovanja obeh regij do zdaj še ni spremljal ustrezen politični dialog; meni, da je enourno srečanje med predsedniki vlad trojke EU in CARIFORUM enkrat v dveh letih nezadostno, in pozdravlja predlog, da se takšnemu dialogu na vseh ravneh v prihodnje nameni ustrezen čas;
Endorses the Commission's analysis that cooperation between the two regions has not thus far been accompanied by proper political dialogue; regards as inadequate the practice of holding, once every two years, a one-hour meeting between the EU Troika and the CARIFORUM heads of government and welcomes the proposal that in future the requisite amount of time should be allocated to such a dialogue at all levels;
pozdravlja načrtovano vključevanje francoskih čezmorskih departmajev v regiji (Gvadalup, Francoska Gvajana in Martinik) ter karibskih čezmorskih držav in ozemelj v prihodnji politični dialog; vendar v zvezi s tem zastopa stališče karibskih držav, da bi se bilo treba o urejanju tega vključevanja najprej pogajati s tistimi državami, ki so v okviru Sporazuma iz Cotonouja Sporazum o partnerstvu med skupino afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP) na eni strani in Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani, podpisan v Cotonouju 23. junija 2000 (UL L 317, 15.12.2000, str.
Welcomes the planned involvement of the French overseas departments in the region (Guadeloupe, French Guinea and Martinique) and the Caribbean overseas countries and territories (OCTs) in the future political dialogue; in that connection, however, endorses the view expressed by the Caribbean States that the arrangements for this involvement must first be negotiated with those States which, in the context of the Cotonou Agreement Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p.
podpisale sporazum o metodologiji za politični dialog;
, signed the agreement on the methodology for the political dialogue;
se strinja s stališčem držav AKP, da opredelitev ločenih politik EU za tri regije AKP nikakor ne sme oslabiti skupnega odnosa med Evropsko unijo in državami AKP; pozdravlja dodaten forum političnega dialoga, ki je nastal na vrhu Evropske unije ter držav Latinske Amerike in Karibov (latinskoameriške države), vendar vztraja pri tem, da imajo prednost dogovori iz Sporazuma iz Cotonouja;
Endorses the standpoint adopted by the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP) that the definition of separate EU policies for the three ACP regions must on no account serve to undermine overall relations between the European Union and the ACP States; welcomes the establishment of an additional forum for political dialogue in the form of summits between the European Union and the States of Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC States), but insists on the primacy of the arrangements made in the context of the Cotonou Agreement;
pozdravlja namero, navedeno v sporočilu Komisije, za okrepitev verodostojnosti institucij in spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja ter preglednost na finančnem, davčnem in pravnem področju v karibskih državah; poziva karibske države k ratifikaciji Konvencije ZN proti organiziranemu kriminalu in Konvencije ZN proti korupciji;
Welcomes the intention stated in the Commission Communication of strengthening credible institutions and of encouraging good governance and transparency in the spheres of finance, taxation and justice in the Caribbean States; calls on all Caribbean States to ratify the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the UN Convention against Corruption;
podpira namero Komisije, da prednostno podpre novooblikovani karibski enotni trg in gospodarstvo; ponavlja svoje stališče, da morajo biti razvojni cilji v središču pogajanj v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, da potrebuje karibski notranji trg, ki se postavlja na noge, ustrezno podporo, povezano s trgovino, ter vzpostavljanje zmogljivosti in liberalizacijo trgovine v ustreznem zaporedju;
Endorses the Commission's intention of giving priority to supporting the newly-created CSME; reiterates its view that development objectives must form the focus of the EPA negotiations, that the fledgling Caribbean internal market needs adequate trade-related support and capacity-building and that trade liberalisation must be properly sequenced;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu oblikujejo ob upoštevanju regionalnih danosti in omejitev in po potrebi dopuščajo možnost spremenljive geometrije; poziva, naj vsem obveznostim, sprejetim v okviru pogajanj o gospodarskem partnerstvu, sledi dostava razvojne pomoči, povezane s pogajanji v okviru sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki si prizadeva za ista pereča področja kot zadevne vlade, vključno s prestrukturiranjem gospodarstva za povečanje konkurenčnosti, davčnimi prilagoditvami in podporo za olajševanje trgovine;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that EPAs are structured in a way which takes into account regional realities and constraints, allowing for recourse to variable geometry if necessary; calls for any commitments undertaken within the framework of the EPA negotiations to be carefully sequenced with the delivery of EPA-related development support which targets the main areas of concern to the governments concerned, including economic restructuring to enhance competitiveness, fiscal adjustment and trade facilitation support;
ponovno opozarja na znaten prispevek iz prihodkov iz carinskih dajatev v proračun in za naložbeno sposobnost nekaterih karibskih držav ter na osnovi tega sklepa, da ukrepi, ki bi vodili v ukinitev tega prihodka, ki ga trenutno ni mogoče nadomestiti z obdavčenjem, ne smejo biti sprejeti, ne da se zagotovi ustrezno nadomestilo; vendar poudarja, da bi rast trgovine med karibskimi državami in med državami v razvoju na splošno pomagala nadomestiti izgube iz carinskih prihodkov in prispevala k bolj stabilnim virom dohodka;
Draws attention once again to the very significant contribution made by income from customs duties to the budgets and investment capacities of some Caribbean States and concludes, on that basis, that measures leading to the loss of this income, which at present cannot be offset by means of taxation, should not be taken without adequate compensation being provided; stresses, however, that the growth of trade between Caribbean States and between developing countries in general could help to offset losses of tariff revenues and contribute to more stable sources of revenue;