natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti zagotavljanju varstva potrošnikov in njihove izbire pri dokončanju notranjega trga za finančne storitve; poudarja, da so finančni, bančni in zavarovalniški proizvodi zelo zapleteni, ter da morajo zavezujoče politike, ki podpirajo obveščanje potrošnikov in svetovanje, potrošnikom omogočiti, da se seznanijo z vsemi možnostmi, ki so jim na voljo, če naj bi se spodbujalo večje sodelovanje državljanov pri oblikovanju teh proizvodov, zlasti v zvezi z njihovimi prihodnjimi pokojninami; vendar poudarja, da varstvo potrošnikov ne sme biti izgovor za protekcionizem; poudarja, da morajo popolnoma vključen trg maloprodajnih finančnih storitev voditi tržne sile;
Considers that special attention is needed to ensure consumer protection and choice in the completion of the internal market for financial services; stresses that financial, banking and insurance products are extremely complex, and that if citizens are to be encouraged to increase their use of those products, especially when dealing with their future pensions, binding policies favouring consumer information and advice should ensure that consumers are aware of all the options available; stresses, however, that consumer protection cannot be an excuse for protectionism; underlines that a fully integrated retail financial services market must be driven by market forces;
meni, da je ključno vprašanje v zvezi s finančnimi trgi prenos ter popolno izvajanje vse zakonodaje EU, kakor tudi usklajevanje v državah članicah; priporoča okrepitev enotnega izvajanja obstoječe zakonodaje preden se predlagajo dodatna pravila; glede nove zakonodaje poziva Komisijo, naj deluje v skladu z načeli bolje oblikovanih predpisov, da se izogne neupravičenemu dodatnemu bremenu za potrošnike in industrijo;
Believes that, in relation to financial markets, the key issue is the transposition and full implementation of all EU legislation, as well as harmonisation across the Member States; recommends strengthening uniform enforcement of existing legislation before proposing additional rules; in relation to new legislation, urges the Commission to comply with the principle of better regulation, avoiding unjustified additional burdens on consumers and industry;
Izboljšan dostop do pravnih sredstev
Improved access to redress
pozdravlja poudarek strategije na boljšem izvrševanju in boljšemu sistemu pravnih sredstev, ki sta pomembna dejavnika pri izgradnji zaupanja potrošnikov; meni, da je zaupanje potrošnikov najpomembnejši dejavnik za dokončanje notranjega trga za potrošniške proizvode in storitve; priporoča nadaljnje delo na tem področju;
Welcomes the strategy's focus on better enforcement and redress, which are important factors in creating consumer confidence; takes the view that creating consumer confidence is the most important factor for the completion of the internal market for consumer goods and services; advocates further work on this issue;
meni, da bi se morali spori med potrošniki in gospodarskimi subjekti reševati predvsem zunaj sodišča, saj se odločitve o odškodninah z nesodnimi sredstvi sprejemajo hitreje in ceneje; to pomeni, da je treba okrepiti evropske potrošniške centre in sistem SOLVIT ter povečati finančna sredstva za njihovo mrežo; opozarja, da lahko države članice predvidijo, da mora stranka, ki namerava vložiti tožbo, predhodno izvesti posvetovanje, s čemer se toženi stranki omogoči, da preneha s sporno kršitvijo;
Takes the view that disputes between consumers and economic operators should primarily be settled out of court, as solutions reached by non-judicial means of redress may be more rapid and reached at a lower cost; this necessitates strengthening the European Consumers Centres and SOLVIT and greater financial resources for their network; recalls that Member States are free to require that a prior consultation be undertaken by the party that intends to bring an action in order to give the defendant an opportunity to bring the contested infringement to an end;
opozarja, da so sistemi alternativnega reševanja sporov (ADR) po svoji naravi nadomestilo tradicionalnim zavezujočim pravnim mehanizmom; zato je spodbuda za uporabo ADR odvisna od obstoja nadomestnih možnosti zavezujočega prava, ki potrošnikom zagotavljajo učinkovita, lahko dostopna in nediskriminatorna pravna sredstva;
Recalls that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) systems are, by their nature, an alternative solution to traditional black-letter law mechanisms; the incentive to use ADR is therefore dependent on the existence of hard-law alternatives that provide effective, readily accessible and non-discriminatory redress for the consumer;
opozarja, da rast elektronskega trgovanja potrebuje usklajevanje ADR v vsej EU, ki izpolnjuje zahteve iz priporočila Komisije 98/257/ES z dne 30. marca 1998 o načelih, ki načelih, ki veljajo za organe, odgovorne za izvensodno reševanje potrošniških sporov UL L 115, 17.4.1998, str.
Recalls that the growth of e-commerce necessitates a harmonisation throughout the EU of ADR which satisfies the requirements of Commission Recommendation 98/257/EC of 30 March 1998 on the principles applicable to the bodies responsible for out-of-court settlement of consumer disputes OJ L 115, 17.4.1998, p.
in priporočila Komisije 2001/310/ES z dne 4. aprila 2001 o načelih za izvensodne organe, ki sodelujejo pri sporazumnem reševanju potrošniških sporov UL L 109, 19.4.2001, str.
and Commission Recommendation 2001/310/EC of 4 April 2001 on the principles for out-of-court bodies involved in the consensual resolution of consumer disputes OJ L 109, 19.4.2001, p.
; na področju reševanja sporov preko interneta je potrebnega več dela, k čemur Parlament poziva že vsaj od leta 1999;
; more work is needed on on-line dispute resolution, for which Parliament has been calling since at least 1999;
opozarja, da so za varovanje učinkovitega uveljavljanja pravic, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje Skupnosti, v prvi vrsti zadolžene države članice; odgovorne so, da nacionalno procesno pravo prilagodijo tako, da je te pravice mogoče začeti nemudoma izvajati v korist potrošnikov in gospodarskih subjektov; prvič, Skupnost nima pristojnosti, da bi izdajala predpise za nacionalno procesno pravo, poleg tega pa člen 5 Pogodbe ES nalaga, da Skupnost ne sme preseči okvirov, potrebnih za dosego ciljev Pogodbe; v skladu z navedenim členom je treba, kolikor je mogoče, upoštevati posebnosti nacionalnih pravnih sistemov in pustiti državam članicam možnost, da izberejo med različnimi možnostmi z enakim učinkom;
Recalls that safeguarding effective enforcement of rights originating from Community legislation is principally an obligation of Member States; they are responsible for adapting their national procedural law in such a way that these rights are readily enforceable, to the benefit of consumers and economic operators; first of all, the Community is not competent to prescribe rules for national procedural law, and moreover, Article 5 of the EC Treaty requires the Community not to go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty; consequently, in accordance with that Article, the specific features of national legal systems must as far as possible be taken into account by leaving Member States free to choose between different options having equivalent effect;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči prednosti imenovanja posebnega evropskega varuha pravic potrošnikov za čezmejne primere; ugotavlja, da ima kar nekaj držav članic varuhe pravic potrošnikov na različnih področjih, ki tako pomagajo potrošnikom pri soočanju z gospodarskimi subjekti; meni, da lahko Komisija preuči ta pristop za vsako državo posebej;
Calls on the Commission to explore the merits of establishing a special European Consumer Ombudsman for cross-border cases; notes that a number of Member States have consumer ombudsmen in several sectors, helping consumers to deal with economic operators; believes this approach could be examined by the Commission on a country-by-country basis;
ugotavlja, da v nekaterih, čeprav ne v vseh državah članicah že obstajajo elementi specifičnih potrošniških odškodninskih sistemov kot so skupne, skupinske, reprezentativne tožbe, testni primeri in postopki za zaplembo nezakonito pridobljenega dobička; poudarja dejstvo, da se zaradi tega lahko potrošniki soočajo z različnimi pravnimi določbami v čezmejnih primerih;
Notes that in some, but not all, Member States elements of a specific consumer redress system already exist, such as joint actions, group actions, representative actions, test cases and skimming-off procedures; points to the fact that, as a result, consumers may face different legal provisions in cross-border cases in this respect;
opozarja, da Direktiva 98/27/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov UL L 166, 11.6.1998, str.
Recalls that Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p.
meni, da je treba pred začetkom obravnavanja zakonodaje na ravni EU izvesti natančen pregled obstoječih težav, v kolikor obstajajo, in predvidenih koristi za potrošnike;
Considers that, before starting any reflections about legislation at EU level, a thorough examination of existing problems, if any, and the envisaged benefits for consumers should be undertaken;
meni, da v številnih državah članicah obstajajo ustavne ovire, ki jih je treba pri oblikovanju evropskega modela pravnih sredstev za potrošnike upoštevati; nadalje meni, da je treba v celoti upoštevati člen 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o načinu, na katerega namerava doseči potrebno ravnovesje med pravicami potrošnikov, potrošniškimi organizacijami in gospodarskimi subjekti;
Considers that in a number of Member States there are constitutional constraints that have to be taken into account when it comes to designing a European model for consumer redress; further considers that Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights needs to be fully respected; calls on the Commission to submit a report to the Parliament and the Council on how, in this regard, to achieve the necessary balance between the rights of consumers, consumer organisations and economic operators;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno preuči vprašanje o pravnih sredstvih za potrošnike v državah članicah, pri tem pa upošteva, da morajo vsi novi predlogi s tega področja temeljiti na natančnem pregledu obstoječih težav in predvidenih koristi za potrošnike in da je treba z ozirom na čezmejne postopke in možne sisteme kolektivnih pravnih sredstev izvesti natančen pregled, pri čemer je treba upoštevati izkušnje z vsega sveta, posebno pozornost pa nameniti pohvalam in kritikam, izraženim na račun ameriškega modela, in jasno rešiti vprašanje primerne pravne podlage za tak instrument na ravni EU; poziva Komisijo, naj nato, kot je primerno, predstavi jasno rešitev na evropski ravni, ki bo vsem potrošnikom omogočila dostop do sistemov kolektivnih pravnih sredstev za reševanje čezmejnih pritožb;
Calls on the Commission to carefully assess the issue of consumer redress in the Member States, bearing in mind that any new proposals by it in that area should be based on a thorough examination of existing problems and the envisaged benefits for consumers, andthat in respect of cross-border proceedings and possible systems of collective redress, extensive research should be carried out, drawing on experience around the world, with special regard to the concerns expressed at the excesses and drawbacks of the US model, and dealing clearly with the question of an appropriate legal base for such an instrument at EU level; asks the Commission then to present, as appropriate, a coherent solution at European level, providing all consumers with access to collective redress mechanisms for the settlement of cross-border complaints;
poziva Komisijo, da se o oceni teh študij posvetuje s Parlamentom in državami članicami;
Asks the Commission to consult Parliament and the Member States on the assessment of those studies;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 20. maja 2008 o napredku v EU na področjih enakih možnosti in nediskriminacije (prenos direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES) ( 2007/2202(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 20 May 2008 on progress made in equal opportunities and non-discrimination in the EU (the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC) ( 2007/2202(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o nediskriminaciji in enakih možnostih za vse – okvirna strategija ( KOM(2005)0224 ),
having regard to the Commission communication on non-discrimination and equal opportunities for all - A framework strategy ( COM(2005)0224 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o uporabi Direktive Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost ( KOM(2006)0643 ),
having regard to the Commission communication on the application of Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin ( COM(2006)0643 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije iz julija 2007 o oblikovanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v Evropi – primerjava 25 držav članic EU,
having regard to the Commission report on Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe: The 25 EU Member States compared, of July 2007,
ob upoštevanju nacionalnih poročil o izvajanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje in tematskih poročil mreže pravnih strokovnjakov za boj proti diskriminaciji, ki jo je ustanovila Komisija, da bi ji pomagala pri njenem delu ter zagotovila neodvisne informacije in nasvete o napredovanju v državah članicah,
having regard to the national reports on the implementation of anti-discrimination legislation and the thematic reports produced by the network of legal experts in anti-discrimination to support its work set up by the Commission in order to provide independent information and advice on relevant developments in the Member States,
ob upoštevanju mednarodne konvencije ZN o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije,
having regard to the UN International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije ZN o pravicah invalidov,
having regard to the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter Protokola številka 12 k tej konvenciji,
having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Protocol No12 thereto,
ob upoštevanju posebne raziskave Eurobarometra iz januarja 2007 o diskriminaciji v Evropski uniji, ki jo je naročila Komisija,
having regard to the Commission's Special Eurobarometer Survey on Discrimination in the European Union, of January 2007,
ob upoštevanju, da je bilo leto 2007 razglašeno za evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse, leto 2008 pa za evropsko leto medkulturnega dialoga,
having regard to the designation of 2007 as European Year of Equal Opportunities for All and 2008 as European Year of Intercultural Dialogue,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0159/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0159/2008 ),
ker je v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji zapisano, da Evropska unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, na načelih, ki so skupna vsem državam članicam, in ker je pomembno, da političnim izjavam o boju proti diskriminaciji sledi postopen napredek in pravilno izvajanje zakonodaje in politike, zlasti direktiv o prepovedi diskriminacije in projektov, ki spodbujajo enakost,
whereas Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union provides that the European Union shall be founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States and it is important that political declarations on the fight against discrimination are matched by the progressive development and full and correct implementation of legislation and policies, notably as regards the directives prohibiting discrimination and projects promoting equality,
ker je v členu 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji tudi zapisano, da Evropska unija spoštuje temeljne pravice, kakršne zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, in ker je v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe ES spodbujanje enakosti in nediskriminacije prednostna naloga zakonodaje in politike Evropske unije,
whereas Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union also provides that the European Union shall respect fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and the promotion of equality and non-discrimination in accordance with Article 13 of the EC Treaty should be a priority of the European Union's laws and policies,
ker je zaposlovanje eden osnovnih zahtev za socialno vključevanje, stopnja nezaposlenosti v številnih skupinah, zlasti med ženskami, migranti, invalidi, etničnimi manjšinami, starostniki in mladimi ter tistimi s posameznimi in nepriznanimi spretnostmi, pa ostaja nesprejemljivo visoka; ker je nezaposlenost med osebami, ki so izpostavljene večvrstni diskriminaciji, še višja,
whereas employment is one of the basic requirements of social inclusion but levels of unemployment among many groups, in particular women, migrants, people with disabilities, ethnic minorities, older and younger people and those with isolated or unrecognised skills, remain unacceptably high; whereas unemployment among persons suffering from multiple discrimination is even higher,
ker pravo Skupnosti trenutno ne pokriva diskriminacije v večini področij pristojnosti Skupnosti in ker obstajajo različne stopnje zaščite v direktivah 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES, ki povzročajo vrzeli pri zaščiti pred diskriminacijo, ki vpliva na zaposlovanje,
whereas Community law does not currently cover discrimination in most areas of Community competence and whereas Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC provide different levels of protection, which create gaps in protection against discrimination that impacts on employment,
ker pregled Komisije o razvoju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v Evropi potrjuje, da na ravni držav članic obstaja "kolaž" zakonodajnih aktov, ki ščitijo pred diskriminacijo na različne načine, pogosto pa ni skupne metode izvajanja, zaradi česar izvajanje direktiv ni usklajeno in se ljudje ne zavedajo dovolj svojih pravic,
whereas the Commission's mapping survey on Developing Anti-Discrimination law in Europe confirms that at Member State level there is a patchwork of legislation across Member States, protecting against discrimination in different ways and often lacking a common method of implementation, which has led to a lack of harmony in the implementation of directives and a situation in which people are not sufficiently aware of their rights,
ker neskladnost izvajanja politike nediskriminacije v državah članicah prispeva k pomanjkljivemu izvajanju direktiv Skupnosti o prepovedi diskriminacije, kar je razvidno iz poročil, kot je poročilo evropske skupine strokovnjakov za boj proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti pri zaposlovanju: zakonodaja v petnajstih državah članicah EU,
whereas the inconsistent application of non-discrimination policies in Member States contributes to the lack of implementation in practice of Community directives prohibiting discrimination, as is reflected in reports such as that of the European Group of Experts on Combating Sexual Orientation Discrimination entitled "Combating sexual orientation discrimination in employment: legislation in fifteen EU member states",
ker je Svet v svoji resoluciji z dne 5. decembra 2007 o nadaljnjem spremljanju evropskega leta enakih možnosti za vse (2007) UL C 308, 19.12.2007, str.
whereas in its resolution of 5 December 2007 on the follow-up of the European Year of Equal Opportunities for All (2007) OJ C 308, 19.12.2007, p.
pozval države članice in Komisijo, naj v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi ohranijo in okrepijo uvajanje vprašanj invalidnosti v vse ustrezne politike,
, the Council invited Member States and the Commission, in accordance with their respective competences, to sustain and reinforce the mainstreaming of disability issues into all relevant policies,
ker je Komisija zato upravičeno pričela postopke proti številnim državam članicam in mora tako še naprej ravnati, kadar je potrebno,
whereas the Commission has therefore justly commenced procedures against several Member States, and needs to continue doing so when necessary,
poziva države članice, da v svoji zakonodajni praksi ustrezno upoštevajo različne razloge za diskriminacijo iz člena 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
Calls on the Member States to take due account in their legislative practice of the various grounds for discrimination set out in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
opozarja, da direktivi 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES opredeljujeta minimalne zahteve in morata zato biti osnova, na kateri je treba oblikovati celovitejšo protidiskriminacijsko politiko;
Recalls that Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC provide minimum requirements and should be the foundation on which a more comprehensive Community anti-discrimination policy is built;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkljivosti pri prenosu in izvajanju direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES v nekaterih državah članicah in zaradi pomanjkljivega informiranja državljanov EU o možnih sredstvih v primerih diskriminacije;
Expresses concern about deficiencies in the transposition and implementation of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC by some Member States and the lack of information for EU citizens about possible remedies in cases of discrimination;
obžaluje, da direktivi 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES ne zajemata razlik v diskriminacijskem obravnavanju na podlagi telesnih meril, kot je višina ali barva kože, zlasti v zvezi z dostopom do delovnih mest, kjer ni neposredne povezave med temi telesnimi značilnostmi in spretnostmi, potrebnimi za opravljanje zadevnega dela;
Regrets that Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC do not cover differences in treatment of a discriminatory nature based on physical criteria such as height or complexion, particularly in relation to access to jobs where there is no direct link between those physical characteristics and the skills required to perform the jobs concerned;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da se direktivi 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES po prenosu vseh njunih določb v celoti, pravilno in učinkovito preneseta in ustrezno izvajata ter da se v skladu z njunimi določbami upravičijo vse izjeme;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that, following the transposition of all their provisions, Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC are fully, correctly and effectively transposed and adequately implemented, and that, in accordance with their provisions, any exemptions are objectively justified;
poziva pristojne organe na ravni EU, nacionalni in lokalni ravni, naj bolj uskladijo svoja prizadevanja za izvajanje; poziva k enotnemu pristopu k boju proti diskriminaciji, ki bo vključeval in hkrati upošteval vse razloge za diskriminacijo;
Calls on the competent EU, national and local authorities to improve the coordination of their efforts of implementation; calls for a unified approach to combating discrimination which is inclusive of, and takes into account, all grounds for discrimination at the same time;
poudarja, da imajo javni organi bistveno vlogo pri spodbujanju enakosti in preprečevanju diskriminacije, prek svojih politik, zagotavljanja storitev in prakse zaposlovanja;
Emphasises that public authorities have a key role to play in promoting equality and preventing discrimination, through their policies, their provision of services and their employment practices;