natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj določi jasno logiko posredovanja za vsak morebitni program, ki bo nasledil sedanji program javnega zdravja; poudarja, da je to treba izvesti v predhodni oceni učinka, ki bo priložena predlogu Komisije za takšen program;
Invites the Commission to set out an explicit intervention logic for any putative successor programme to the current PHP; stresses that this should be done in its ex-ante impact assessment which is to accompany the Commission proposal for such a programme;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj predloži uradno mnenje o predhodni oceni učinka Komisije pravočasno za posvetovanje Parlamenta in Sveta o predlogu Komisije za sklep o programu; meni, da mora Sodišče pri pripravi mnenja upoštevati stališča Parlamenta, kot so navedena zgoraj;
Asks the Court of Auditors to submit a formal opinion on the Commission's ex-ante impact assessment in time for the deliberation by Parliament and the Council of the Commission's proposal for a programme decision; considers that, when preparing its opinion, the Court should take into consideration Parliament's views as set out above;
ugotavlja, da so nekatere čistilne naprave premalo izkoriščene in zahteva, da je treba za čistilne naprave, ki jih financira EU, vzdrževati stroškovno učinkovit sistem delovanja; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj poiščejo načine za zagotovitev, da bodo čistilne naprave, ki jih financira EU, ustrezno priključene na kanalizacijsko omrežje; poudarja, da so države članice odgovorne za delovanje čistilnih naprav, in jih poziva, naj si prizadevajo za zagotovitev primerne kakovosti odplak in v celoti izkoristijo zmogljivosti;
Takes note of the under-utilisation of some treatment plants and urges the EU-funded treatment plants to maintain a cost-effective system of functioning; therefore encourages the Commission and Member States to find ways to ensure that EU-funded treatment plants are adequately connected to the sewage networks; stresses the Member States‘ responsibility for the operation of treatment plants and encourages the Member States to make efforts to ensure adequate effluent quality and the full use of capacities;
priznava prizadevanja Komisije za revizijo zadevne direktive (direktiva Sveta 86/278/EGS Direktiva Sveta 86/278/EGS z dne 12. junija 1986 o varstvu okolja, zlasti tal, kadar se blato iz čistilnih naprav uporablja v kmetijstvu (UL L 191, 15.7.1986, str.
Acknowledges the Commission's efforts to bring about a revision of the relevant Directive (Council Directive 86/278/EEC Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture (OJ L 191, 15.7.1986, p.
o blatu iz čistilnih naprav), spodbuja pospešitev sedanjega revizijskega postopka z namenom vključitve nedavnih dosežkov in poenotenja različnega ravnanja držav članic na tem področju ter poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo kakovost blata iz čistilnih naprav, ki bo v skladu z omejitvami EU;
– the Sewage Sludge Directive), encourages the speeding-up of the current revision procedure in order to incorporate recent developments and adjust Member States‘ different practices in this field, and urges the Member States to ensure a quality of sewage sludge that complies with EU limits;
poudarja potrebo po strožjem preverjanju projektov v fazi izvajanja, s čimer bi preprečili pomanjkljivosti v pričakovanem učinku; zato poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej razvija notranje smernice in kontrolne sezname za uporabo v postopkih ocenjevanja, da bi izboljšali skladnost vlog za financiranje ter zagotovili ustrezne nadaljnje ukrepe, ko ne bi bilo zahtevanih informacij ali ukrepov;
Underlines the need for a more rigorous examination of projects at the application stage in order to prevent shortcomings in anticipated effect; therefore invites the Commission to further develop internal guidelines and checklists for use in the appraisal process, in order to improve consistency of grant applications, and to ensure proper follow-up action in cases where required information or action is not forthcoming;
Posebno poročilo št. 4/2009 o Komisijinem upravljanju vključenosti nedržavnih akterjev v razvojno sodelovanje ES
Special report No 4/2009 on the Commission's management of Non-State Actors‘ involvement in EC Development Cooperation
obžaluje sedanje nedopustne vrzeli med obvezami politike EU glede udeležbe nedržavnih akterjev v razvojnem sodelovanju in dejanskimi praksami izvajanja teh obvez, zato pričakuje, da bo pristojni član Komisije predložil dokaze glede popolne politične podpore in vodilnih ukrepov za učinkovito izvajanje političnih obvez v povezavi z nedržavnimi akterji tako na sedežih Komisije kot v njenih delegacijah; obžaluje tudi, da je merilo uspešnosti za razvoj omejeno na „gospodarski razvoj“, saj ta pristop ne upošteva dejstva, da se je vrzel med tistimi, ki imajo, in tistimi, ki nimajo, zelo povečala; poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi, da bodo do konca leta 2010 vse delegacije za polni delovni čas zaposlile vsaj enega strokovnjaka za politike, kontakte in pogodbe na področju nedržavnih akterjev;
Regrets and cannot accept the existing gap between EU policy commitments as regards the involvement of Non-State Actors (NSAs) in development corporation and actual implementation practices, and therefore expects the competent Member of the Commission to present evidence showing full political support and leadership action for an effective implementation of policy commitments vis-à-vis NSAs, on the part of both its headquarters and the Commission delegations; further regrets that the success criterion for development is reduced to ‘economic development’, because this approach ignores the fact that the gap between those who have and those who have not has dramatically widened; requests the Commission to see to it that, by the end of 2010, every delegation has at least one responsible full-time expert dealing with NSAs‘ policies, contacts and contracts;
je seznanjen s tem, da so bile države v razvoju, ki so same prevzele izvajanje razvojnih procesov, uspešne pri zmanjševanju revščine; poudarja pomembno vlogo države pri razvoju ter poziva Komisijo in njene delegacije, naj še izboljšajo odnose z vladami partnerskih držav, da bo omogočeno učinkovitejše sodelovanje in posvetovanje z nedržavnimi akterji;
Notes that those developing countries which have taken their development process into their own hands have achieved good levels of poverty reduction; underlines the key role of the State in development and invites the Commission and its delegations to further improve relationships with partner country governments in order to enable there to be more effective engagement and consultation with NSAs;
močno obžaluje pomanjkanje popolnih in zanesljivih podatkov in pričakuje, da bo Komisija glede tega takoj ukrepala, saj so zanesljivi podatki pogoj za začetek merjenja rezultatov; zato poziva Komisijo, naj pred začetkom proračunskega postopka za leto 2011 Parlamentu predloži popoln finančen pregled sredstev EU, posredovanih prek nedržavnih akterjev iz različnih proračunskih vrstic, ki naj bo razčlenjen po zadevnih državah;
Finds the lack of complete and reliable data extremely regrettable and expects the Commission to take remedial action immediately in so far as reliable data is a condition for starting to measure results; therefore calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament a full financial overview of the EU funds channelled through NSAs from the different budget lines subdivided by the countries concerned before the start of the 2011 budget procedure;
meni, da je kakovost pomoči pomembnejša od njene količine ter poziva Komisijo, naj prevzame pomembno vlogo pri reševanju očitnega kaosa pri razvojni pomoči s spodbujanjem močnega in učinkovitega usklajevanja donatorjev in izboljšanjem sedanje strukture pomoči; poziva Komisijo, naj izkoristi ta trenutek in v celoti upošteva pripombe Sveta ter natančno pregleda ves sistem (so-)financiranja nedržavnih akterjev za zagotovitev, da se bodo ti lahko zanesli na pregledna in učinkovita pravila za sodelovanje v programih in projektih;
Takes the view that quality of aid is more important than quantity of aid and invites the Commission to play an important role in addressing the evident chaos in development assistance by promoting strong and efficient donor coordination and improving the current aid architecture; requests the Commission to consider whether this may not be the right moment, taking full account of the Court's remarks, to overhaul the whole system of (co-)financing of NSAs in order to make sure that NSAs can rely on transparent and efficient rules for the purposes of participation in programmes and projects;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva dejstvo, da so donatorji politični akterji in da v nekaterih primerih lahko pride do nasprotja interesov med donatorji in državami prejemnicami; poudarja, da so močne demokratične nacionalne institucije in dobro opredeljena politika za porazdelitev bogastva pogoj za trajnost; meni, da je za doseg skladnejše politike pri načrtovanju, kasnejših programih in projektih ter primernem ocenjevanju potreben bistven premik s sofinanciranih projektov za nedržavne akterje na projekte, ki jih bo 100 % financirala EU;
Invites the Commission to give due consideration to the fact that donors are political actors and that in some cases there might be conflicting interests between donors and recipient countries; underlines that strong democratic national institutions and a well-defined policy for distribution of wealth are preconditions of sustainability; is of the opinion that, in order to achieve a more coherent policy in programming and subsequent programmes and projects and adequate evaluation, there should be a substantial shift from co-financing projects for NSAs to a 100 % EU funding of projects;
meni, da se ocenjevanje pomoči EU, ki ga za Komisijo izvajajo organizacije civilne družbe http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/2008/1259_docs_en.htm
Believes there is a certain overlap between the evaluation carried out for the Commission of EU aid delivery through civil society organisations http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/2008/1259_docs_en.htm.
, do določene mere prekriva s posebnim poročilom Računskega poročila; poziva Sodišče in službe za ocenjevanje v Komisiji, naj si izmenjujejo informacije o načrtovanih dejavnostih in Parlamentu poročajo o izidih te prakse;
and the Court of Auditors‘ Special Report, and invites the Court and the evaluation units in the Commission to exchange information on planned activities and to report to Parliament on the results of this exercise;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predloge za spremembo finančne uredbe, ki bo EU omogočila močno vlogo med drugimi mednarodnimi donatorji;
Invites the Commission to present proposals for modifications of the Financial Regulation which will allow the EU to act as a strong player among other international donors;
meni, da bi morala Komisija izboljšati nadzor različnih dejavnosti pri vodenju zakladnice, v skladu s priporočilom Računskega sodišča pa bi se morala oba generalna direktorata (GD za proračun (GD BUDG) in GD za gospodarske in finančne zadeve (GD ECFIN)) pogosteje srečevati z namenom izmenjave informacij glede tveganj ter izmenjave izkušenj in najboljših praks v povezavi z upravljanjem zakladnice in premoženja na ravni celotne Komisije;
Considers that the Commission should improve its oversight of the different treasury management activities performed and, as recommended by the Court of Auditors, meetings should take place more regularly between the two DGs concerned (DG Budget (DG BUDG) and the DG for Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN)) with a view to sharing information on risks and exchanging experiences and best practices regarding treasury and asset management activities on a Commission-wide level;
meni, da bi morala Komisija še naprej ustrezno ukrepati, da bo skozi vse leto zagotovila učinkovito in natančno spremljanje pomembnih finančnih tveganj; pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je Komisija v želji, da bi izboljšala razmere, z Računskim sodiščem na lasten predlog že dogovorila, da se z zaključnim računom za leto 2008 vpletenim finančnim organizacijam začne pošiljati uradne okrožnice, da se od njih pridobi točne, popolne in standardizirane podatke o fiduciarnih računih;
Considers that the Commission should continue to take all necessary action to ensure that significant financial risks are effectively and closely monitored throughout the course of the year; welcomes the fact that, in order to further improve the situation, the Commission has already proposed to and agreed with the Court of Auditors that as from the 2008 closure an official circular letter is to be sent to the financial organisations concerned in order to obtain from them accurate, complete and standardised information regarding the fiduciary accounts;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi nadzorni načrt za GD BUDG za dvanajstmesečna obdobja na podlagi analize tveganj, opravlja nadzor tako med letom kot ob njegovem koncu ter Parlamentu najpozneje tri mesece po zaključku zadevnega leta poroča o morebitnih težavah;
Invites the Commission to draw up a control plan in DG BUDG for each 12-month period on the basis of risk analysis, to carry out controls during and after the year, and to report to Parliament on the problems encountered no later than three months after the end of the year concerned;
poziva Komisijo, naj pohiti s pregledom tveganj v zvezi s transakcijami zakladnice (GD BUDG), ki je del priprave letnih računovodskih izkazov, ter pripravi jasen in izčrpen povzetek o tem, kakšnim tveganjem je zakladnica izpostavljena, kako poteka obvladovanje teh tveganj in kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za njihov nadzor, zmanjševanje oziroma preprečevanje;
Invites the Commission to move ahead with the overview of the risks related to its treasury operations (DG BUDG), which forms part of its annual accounts and which provides a clear and comprehensive summary of the risks to which it is exposed, of the ways in which such risks are managed, and of the measures which have been put in place to control, minimise or neutralise them;
ocenjuje, da bi morala Komisija zaradi preglednosti jasneje dokumentirati svoje postopke za prenos denarja med računi lastnih sredstev držav članic in konkretne izbirne postopke v posameznih primerih;
Considers that, for the sake of transparency, the Commission should more clearly document its procedures for transferring funds between Member States‘ own resources accounts, and should and better document the specific selection procedure followed in each case;
poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša podatkovne zbirke za evidenco in navzkrižno preverjanje ter upošteva ugotovitve Računskega sodišča glede boljšega usklajevanja, ki je potrebno, da bo mogoče oceniti skupno izpostavljenost Komisije tveganju pri posamezni komercialni banki, kadar limit na računih pri teh bankah, kjer se hranijo sredstva, določata zadevna generalna direktorata;
Asks the Commission to improve its database record-keeping, to optimise cross-checks and to follow up on the Court's observation concerning the coordination improvement needed in order to take into consideration the Commission's overall risk exposure with each commercial bank when the accounts‘ limits for holding funds with commercial banks are established by the DGs concerned;
pozdravlja in podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da bi predlagala obstoječi sistem upravljanja začasno pobranih glob, ki je bil revidiran v letu 2008, in pričakuje, da bo predlog za odločbo Komisije v tej zadevi, ki jo je v začetku leta 2009 izdal GD BUDG, povečala njegovo varnost;
Welcomes and supports the Commission's endeavours to propose the current system for the management of provisionally cashed fines, which was subject to a review in 2008, and expects that the proposal for a Commission decision on this matter issued in early 2009 by DG BUDG will increase its security;
Posebno poročilo št. 6/2009 o pomoči Evropske unije v hrani za ogrožene osebe: ocena ciljev, sredstev in uporabljenih metod
Special report No 6/2009 on European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed
pozdravlja, da je Sodišče revidiralo ta program in predlog Komisije za reformo ( KOM(2008)0563 ); se sklicuje na svoje stališče z dne 26. marca 2009 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0188 .
Welcomes the Court's audit of this programme as well as the Commission's reform proposal ( COM(2008)0563 ); refers to its position adopted on 26 March 2009 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0188 .
, v kateri je podprl predlog reforme; poudarja, da so ukrepi za pomoč v hrani dodatna pomoč k že sprejetim ukrepom v državah članicah;
in which it supported the reform proposal;underlines that EU food aid action is a complement to already existing actions in the Member States;
opominja, da se socialna pomoč, ki jo zagotavljajo organi držav članic, redko osredotoča na dostop do hrane ter da bi morale pobude, povezane s hrano, ki so namenjene socialno izključenemu in obrobnemu prebivalstvu, voditi dobrodelne organizacije s pomočjo prostovoljcev;
Recalls that social support provided by Member State authorities rarely focuses on access to food and that food initiatives targeting socially excluded and marginal populations tend to be led by charitable organisations and run with the help of volunteers;
meni, da so potrebna boljša merila za usmerjanje pomoči tistim državam in prejemnikom, ki jo najbolj potrebujejo;
Believes that better criteria are needed to target aid at those countries and recipients that are most in need;
meni, da morajo države članice, ki sodelujejo pri programu, razviti učinkovite ukrepe za boj proti tratenju hrane;
Believes that Member States participating in the programme should develop efficient measures for combating food waste;
opominja Komisijo, da načelo subsidiarnosti ne zmanjšuje njenih obvez iz člena 317 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim Komisija izvršuje proračun na lastno odgovornost in ob upoštevanju načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Reminds the Commission that the principle of subsidiarity in no way reduces the Commission's obligations under Article 317 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, according to which the Commission implements the budget ‘on its own responsibility’ and ‘having regard to the principles of sound financial management’;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija izvedla priporočila Sodišča, da bosta proračunska organa imela na voljo popolne in nepristranske informacije o rezultatih programa;
Expects the Commission to implement the Court's recommendations in order to allow the budgetary authorities to have complete and objective information on the results of the programme;
obžaluje, da je bilo v skladu z ugotovitvami Sodišča upravljanje programa Galileo med razvojno in validacijsko fazo neustrezno; ugotavlja, da je pri tehnološkem razvoju prišlo do petletne zamude v primerjavi s prvotnim načrtovanjem ter da so se stroški, predvideni za razvojno in validacijsko fazo, skoraj podvojili z 1 100 000 000 EUR na 2 100 000 000 EUR;
Regrets that, according to the Courts‘ findings, the management of the development and validation phase of the Galileo programme was inadequate; notes that the technological development has been set back five years compared to the initial planning and that the cost estimates for the development and validation phase have almost doubled from EUR 1 100 000 000 to EUR 2 100 000 000;
poziva Komisijo, naj sledi priporočilom Sodišča v prihodnjem sporočilu o prihodnosti programa Galileo, zlasti glede razjasnitve političnih ciljev tega programa in njihovega prenosa v strateške in operativne cilje, kar bi programu zagotovilo trden časovni načrt do njegove popolne uvedbe;
Asks the Commission to follow up on the Courts‘ recommendation in the forthcoming Communication on the future of Galileo with a view to clarifying the Galileo programme's political objectives and translating them into strategic and operational objectives in order to establish a solid roadmap for Galileo pending full deployment;
je zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve Sodišča, da skupno podjetje Galileo (GJU) ni doseglo večine svojih ciljev in da so njegove dejavnosti resno ovirale težave v zvezi z vodenjem; poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s priporočili Sodišča zagotovi, da v primeru prihodnjih skupnih podjetij in programov vodstvena struktura ne bo ovirala dejavnosti skupnega podjetja;
Is worried by the Court's finding that the Galileo Joint Undertaking failed to achieve most of its objectives and that its activities were seriously constrained by governance issues; asks the Commission to ensure, in line with the Court's recommendation, that in the case of future joint undertakings the governance structure does not impede the activities of the joint undertaking;
meni, da je treba evropske davkoplačevalce obvestiti o kakršnem koli sodelovanju tretjih držav pri programih Galileo in EGNOS; zato zahteva, da Komisija Parlamentu posreduje podrobne podatke o vseh sodelovanjih med EU in tretjimi državami glede programov Galileo in EGNOS;
Considers that the European taxpayers should be informed of any participation by third countries in the Galileo and EGNOS programmes; therefore requests that the Commission provide Parliament with detailed information on any kind of cooperation between the EU and third countries concerning the Galileo and EGNOS programmes;
poziva, naj Komisija in Evropski nadzorni organ za GNSS v svojih računovodskih izkazih, Sodišče pa v svojih poročilih, organu za podelitev razrešnice nudijo jasnejše in celovite informacije glede opredmetenih in neopredmetenih sredstev, ki so bila ustvarjena v okviru programov Galileo in EGNOS in ki so last Evropske unije;
Calls on the Commission and the European GNSS Supervisory Authority, in its accounts, and the Court, in its reports, to provide the discharge authority with clear and comprehensive information concerning the tangible and intangible assets created under the Galileo and EGNOS programmes, which are owned by the European Union;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi posodobljene zneske ter analize stroškov in koristi za projekt Galileo in naj o tem ustrezno obvešča Parlament;
Calls on the Commission to prepare updated figures and cost benefit analyses of the Galileo project and to inform Parliament accordingly;
Posebno poročilo št. 8/2009 o „mrežah odličnosti“ in „integriranih projektih“ v raziskovalni politiki Skupnosti: ali so dosegli svoje cilje?
Special report No 8/2009 on ‘Networks of excellence’ and ‘Integrated projects’ in Community Research policy: did they achieve their objectives?
je seznanjen z visoko razliko med pričakovanji, saj je manj kot 55 % vseh projektov, ki so bili naknadno pregledani, obdržalo svojo začetno odlično oceno; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o svojih postopkih ocenjevanja;
Notes the existence of a high ‘expectation gap’, i.e. the fact that fewer than 55 % of all projects reviewed ex post maintained their initial ‘excellent’ evaluation; asks the Commission to reconsider its evaluation procedures;
opozarja, da velika večina vlog ne presega praga odličnosti (le 15 do 20 %), medtem ko stroške vloge nosijo prosilci (v nekaterih primerih stroški znašajo do 300.000 EUR); glede tega poziva Komisijo, naj skladno in učinkovito uporabi razumno preudarnost (na primer z večstopenjskimi postopki), da bo čim učinkoviteje porabila denar, namenjen izvajanju in ne upravljanju raziskav;
Recalls that the vast majority of applications do not exceed the ‘excellence’ threshold (only 15 % to 20 %), whereas application costs (amounting in some cases to as much as EUR 300 000) are borne by applicants; in this regard, urges the Commission to apply coherently and efficiently sensible discretion (e.g. multi-stage procedures) in order to make most efficient use of the money allocated to research instead of ‘administration of research’;