natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker problematika, ki jo je treba preučiti v skladu s prvim poročilom, predloženim na podlagi člena 16(c), zadeva vprašanje, ali naj se dovolijo patenti zaporedij genov (zaporedja DNK) v skladu s klasičnim modelom patentnega zahtevka, po katerem lahko prvi izumitelj zahteva izum, ki zajema morebitne prihodnje uporabe tega zaporedja, ali pa je treba patent omejiti, da se lahko zahteva samo posebna uporaba, kakor je izkazana v patentni prijavi ("namensko varstvo"),
whereas the issue to be reviewed, according to the first report submitted under Article 16(c) of the Directive, is the question whether patents on gene sequences (DNA sequences) should be allowed in accordance with the classical model of patent claim, whereby a first inventor can claim an invention which covers possible future uses of that sequence, or whether the patent should be restricted so that only the specific use disclosed in the patent application may be claimed ("purpose-bound protection"),
ker je treba za pridobitev embrionalnih zarodnih celic uničiti zarodke in ker je patentiranje tehnologij, s katerimi se zarodki uničujejo ali uporabljajo v komercialne ali industrijske namene, izključeno v skladu s členom 6(2)(c) Direktive,
whereas for the creation of embryonic stem cells embryos have to be destroyed and the patenting of technologies where human embryos are destroyed or used for commercial or industrial purposes is excluded according to Article 6(2)(c) of the Directive,
ker člen 6 direktive izključuje kloniranje človeških bitij in je Svet v svojih obrazložitvah Parlamentu jasno navedel, da prepoved patentiranja ne zajema le reproduktivnega kloniranja in da izraz "človeško bitje" v tem pomenu vključuje tudi zarodek,
whereas Article 6 of the Directive excludes the cloning of human beings and the Council made it clear in its explanatory statements to Parliament that this ban on patenting does not cover only reproductive cloning and that the term 'human being' in this regard includes the embryonic phase,
podpira biotehnologijo kot tehnologijo prihodnosti in meni, da je primeren politični okvir pomemben za podporo tej tehnologiji, pri čemer se upoštevajo tudi etični, okoljski in zdravstveni vidiki;
Supports biotechnology as a future technology and considers that an appropriate political framework is important to support this technology, also taking account of ethical, environmental and health aspects;
meni, da je patentiranje biotehnoloških izumov v skladu s skupnimi pravili po vsej Evropi pomemben predpogoj za zagotavljanje ustrezne podpore tej tehnologiji prihodnosti v Evropi;
Considers the patenting of biotechnological inventions in accordance with common rules throughout Europe to be an important precondition for the provision in Europe of appropriate support for this future technology;
podpira nadaljnje raziskave s področja izvornih celic in drugih alternativnih možnosti v korist človekovega zdravja, vendar opozarja na svoje temeljno stališče v zvezi z uporabo biotehnologije pri ljudeh, zlasti na dejstvo, da zavrača posege v človeško zarodno linijo, kloniranje človeka na vseh stopnjah razvoja in raziskave človeških zarodkov, ki slednje uničijo;
Supports further stem-cell research and other alternatives to promote human health but underlines its fundamental position regarding the application of biotechnology to human beings, especially the rejection of interventions in the human germ line, the rejection of cloning of the human being in all phases of its development and the rejection of research on human embryos, which destroys the embryo;
meni, da Direktiva v večini primerov zagotavlja okvir za to, vendar pomembna vprašanja ostajajo nerešena, na primer patentiranje človeške DNK;
Considers that the Directive provides the framework for this in most cases, but that it still leaves important questions open, such as the patenting of human DNA;
poziva Evropski patentni urad in države članice, naj patente človeških DNK podeljujejo samo v zvezi s konkretno uporabo in z omejitvijo obsega patenta na to konkretno uporabo, tako da lahko drugi uporabaniki uporabljajo in patentiranjo isto zaporedje DNK za druge namene (namensko varstvo);
Calls on the European Patent Office and the Member States to grant patents on human DNA only in connection with a concrete application and for the scope of the patent to be limited to this concrete application so that other users can use and patent the same DNA sequence for other applications (purpose-bound protection);
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali je mogoče pridobiti razlago Direktive v obliki priporočila državam članicam, ali pa je potrebna sprememba člena 5 Direktive;
Calls on the Commission to examine whether this interpretation of the Directive can be achieved by means of a recommendation to the Member States or whether it requires an amendment to Article 5 of the Directive;
ponovno ugotavlja, da raziskovalni razlogi v nobenem primeru ne smejo privesti do neupoštevanja dostojanstva človeškega življenja;
Reaffirms that no consideration of research can be allowed to override that of the dignity of human life;
je seznanjen z oblikovanjem neformalne skupine svetovalcev o etičnih posledicah biotehnologije, kakor je bilo objavljeno v prvem poročilu, predloženim v skladu s členom 16(c) Direktive, ki obravnava pomembna vprašanja o biotehnoloških izumih in svetovala Komisiji o pripravi prihodnjih poročil;
Notes the setting up of an informal Group of Advisers on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology, as announced in the first report submitted under Article 16(c) of the Directive, which is mandated to analyse important issues surrounding biotechnological inventions and to advise the Commission on the preparation of future reports;
poudarja, da zarodnih celic ne moremo patentirati kot del človeškega telesa in gotovo ne kot izum ter da patent EP1257168 predstavlja kršitev Direktive;
Points out that germ cells are not patentable as part of the human body and certainly not an invention, and that patent EP1257168 therefore constitutes an infringement of the Directive;
je globoko zaskrbljen zaradi kakršnega koli načrta, da bi uvedli metode za izbiro spola ljudi;
Points out its deep concern about any plan to introduce methods for the selection of sex in humans;
ugotavlja, da lahko v skladu s členom 99(1) Evropske patentne konvencije vsakdo vloži ugovor zoper patent;
Notes that any person may file a notice of opposition to the patent according to Article 99(1) of the European Patent Convention;
zahteva od Komisije, naj nemudoma vloži ugovor zoper patent EP1257168,
Asks the Commission to file a notice of opposition to patent EP1257168 without delay;
poziva Evropski patentni urad, Komisijo in pristojne organe v državah članicah, naj sodelujejo s Parlamentom za zagotovitev, da se iz patentiranja v skladu z Direktivo izključijo vse oblike kloniranja človeka;
Calls on the European Patent Office, the Commission and the competent authorities in the Member States to work together with Parliament to confirm that all kinds of human cloning are excluded from patenting under the Directive;
vztraja, da pridobivanje človeških embrionalnih zarodnih celic pomeni uničevanje človeških zarodkov in da zato patentiranje postopkov, ki vključujejo človeške embrionalne zarodne celice ali celice, pridobljene iz človeških embrionalnih zarodnih celic, pomeni kršitev člena 6(2)(c) Direktive;
Insists that the creation of human embryonic stem cells implies the destruction of human embryos and that therefore the patenting of procedures involving human embryonic stem cells or cells that are grown from human embryonic stem cells is a violation of Article 6(2)(c) of the Directive;
je seznanjen s sklepi drugega poročila o obsegu patentov in možnosti patentiranja zarodnih celic;
Takes note of the conclusions of the second report concerning the scope of patents and the patentability of stem cells;
poziva Komisijo, naj v naslednjem poročilu skrbno preuči pravilno izvajanje člena 4(1)(a) Direktive;
Calls on the Commission in the next report to consider carefully the proper implementation of Article 4(1)(a) of the Directive;
poziva Komisijo k nadaljnjemu spremljanju razvoja dogodkov, pri čemer naj upošteva tako etične vidike in kakor tudi možne vplive na razpoložljivost in cenovno dostopnost zdravstvene oskrbe ter konkurenčnost;
Calls on the Commission to continue monitoring developments, taking into account both the ethical aspects and the potential impact on the accessibility and affordability of health care and competitiveness;
poziva, naj Evropski patentni urad ustanovi nov organ, ki bo zaradi občutljivosti vprašanja preverjal patente, ki so občutljivi iz etičnega vidika, preden se jih podeli;
Requests the European Patent Office to set up a further body which, because of the sensitivity of the issue, checks patents that are sensitive from an ethical point of view before they are granted;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic in Evropskemu patentnemu uradu.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States and the European Patent Office.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pristopu EU do urejanja ekonomske migracije ( KOM(2004)0811 – 2005/2059(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on an EU approach to managing economic migration ( COM(2004)0811 - 2005/2059(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije o pristopu EU do urejanja ekonomske migracije ( KOM(2004)0811 ),
having regard to the Commission Green Paper on an EU approach to managing economic migration ( COM(2004)0811 ),
ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah in zlasti člena 13 Deklaracije o svobodi gibanja in bivanja ter pravici do povratka,
having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in particular to Article 13 thereof on freedom of movement and residence and the right to return,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah in zlasti člena 8 Konvencije o pravici do spoštovanja zasebnega in družinskega življenja,
having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and in particular to Article 8 thereof on the right to respect for private and family life,
ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in zlasti člena 15 Listine o poklicni svobodi in pravici do dela,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular to Article 15 thereof on professional freedom and the right to work,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Študija povezav med legalnimi in nelegalnimi migracijami" ( KOM(2004)0412 ),
having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'Study on the links between legal and illegal migration' ( COM(2004)0412 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Prvo letno poročilo o migracijah in vključevanju" ( KOM(2004)0508 ),
having regard to the Commission communication entitled 'First Annual Report on Migration and Integration' ( COM(2004)0508 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij z dne 15. decembra 2004 in 24. januarja 2005 o sporočilu Komisije z naslovom "Študija povezav med legalnimi in nelegalnimi migracijami",
having regard to the opinions of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 15 December 2004 and 24 January 2005 on the Commission Communication entitled 'Study on the links between legal and illegal migration',
ob upoštevanju Amsterdamske pogodbe, ki je na Skupnost prenesla naloge in pristojnosti na področjih priseljevanja in azila, ter člena 63 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to the Treaty of Amsterdam, which conferred on the Community tasks and responsibilities in the areas of immigration and asylum, and to Article 63 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z njegovih zasedanj 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 v Tampereju, 14. in 15. decembra 2001 v Laeknu, dne 21. in 22. junija 2002 v Sevilli ter dne 19. in 20. junija 2003 v Solunu,
having regard to conclusions of the European Council at its meetings of 15 and 16 October 1999 in Tampere, 14 and 15 December 2001 in Laeken, 21 and 22 June 2002 in Seville and 19 and 20 June 2003 in Thessaloniki,
ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila z dne 14. oktobra 2004 o prihodnosti območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter o ukrepih za krepitev njegove legitimnosti in učinkovitosti UL C 166 E, 7.7.2005, str.
having regard to its recommendation to the Council and to the European Council of 14 October 2004 on the future of the area of freedom, security and justice as well as on the measures required to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness thereof OJ C 166 E, 7.7.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z njegovega zasedanja 4. in 5. novembra 2004 v Bruslju ter priloženega haaškega programa,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council at its meeting of 4 and 5 November 2004 in Brussels and the attached Hague Programme,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter Odbora za pravice žensk in politiko enakih možnosti ( A6-0286/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A6-0286/2005 ),
ker bi morala biti naloga Evropske unije, v interesu urejenega priseljevanja delavcev v Skupnost in polne zaposlenosti, razvijati skupno migracijsko politiko v skladu z razvojno politiko Skupnosti in hkratno učinkovito uveljavljanje pravice do prostega pretoka oseb znotraj Skupnosti,
whereas it should be the task of the European Union, in the interests of the managed migration of workers into the Community and of full employment, to develop a common migration policy in accordance with Community development policy and alongside the effective implementation of the right of freedom of movement of persons within the Community,
ker ni evropske migracijske politike, ki bi zagotavljala celovit in usklajen okvir, Evropska unija in njene države članice pa morajo upravljati obstoječe migracijske tokove,
whereas there is no European migration policy providing a comprehensive and coordinated framework, and it is necessary for the European Union and its Member States to manage existing migratory flows,
ker mora Evropska unija v najkrajšem možnem času oblikovati pravo evropsko politiko priseljevanja,
whereas the EU must create a genuine European immigration policy as soon as possible,
ker lahko ekonomsko priseljevanje pomaga urejati obstoječe migracijske tokove in ima za enega pomembnih možnih učinkov zmanjšanje obsega nezakonitih migracij, in ker lahko to še dodatno pomaga odpravljati izkoriščanje nezakonitih priseljencev na črnem trgu in pri trgovini z ljudmi,
whereas economic immigration can help in the management of existing migratory flows, having as one of its important potential effects the reduction of illegal migration, and whereas it can also have the knock-on effect of helping to combat exploitation of illegal immigrants in the black economy and trafficking in people,
ker ekonomska migracija le delno rešuje demografske in gospodarske težave Skupnosti; ker si je treba zaradi soočenja z izzivi globalizacije prizadevati za nove rešitve na področju gospodarske politike in trga dela, zlasti v zvezi z uravnoteženostjo med poklicnim in družinskim življenjem žensk in moških ter z enakim plačilom za enaka dela;
whereas economic migration is only a part of the solution to the Community's demographic and economic difficulties; whereas, in order to meet the challenges of globalisation, efforts should be made to find new solutions in the field of economic policy and the labour market, notably in relation to the balance between professional and family life for women and men and equal pay for equal jobs,
ker mora evropska politika priseljevanja v skladu z veljavnimi mednarodnimi konvencijami temeljiti na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic človeka,
whereas a European immigration policy must be based on respect for the fundamental rights of the person, pursuant to the international conventions in force,
ob upoštevanju napovedi o staranju aktivnega evropskega prebivalstva in bodočimi pritiski na medgeneracijsko solidarnost v Evropi, kar bo v vseh državah članicah EU sprožilo nove potrebe po kvalificirani in nekvalificirani delovni sili,
having regard to the forecasts concerning the ageing of Europe's active population and the future threats to intergenerational solidarity in Europe, which will generate new needs for both skilled and unskilled labour in all the Member States,
ker so glede priseljevanja države članice Evropske unije prešle iz matičnih držav v namembne države;
whereas, with regard to immigration, the Member States have developed from being countries of origin into countries of destination,
ob upoštevanju, da migracijski tokovi ne zadevajo samo mejnih držav, ampak Evropsko unijo kot celoto, zaradi česar je še toliko bolj nujno sprejeti skupno politiko priseljevanja,
whereas, in view of the fact that migratory flows involve not only the border countries but also the European Union as a whole, it is all the more necessary to adopt a common immigration policy,
v prepričanju, da mora Evropska unija kot prostor brez notranjih meja imeti skupen, skladen in učinkovit pristop k varovanju svojih zunanjih meja ter zasnovati skupno politiko na področju vizumov, azila in priseljevanja, ki temelji na medsebojnem spoštovanju in solidarnosti ter je v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi na področju človekovih pravic, z namenom, da se zagotovi varna evropska družba; ker mora takšna politika spoštovati temeljne pravice, vključevati boj proti diskriminaciji, rasizmu in ksenofobiji ter uravnavati migracije na globalni, uravnoteženi in humani podlagi,
convinced that, as an area without internal frontiers, the European Union must pursue a common, coherent and effective approach to securing its external borders and devise a common visa, asylum and immigration policy which is based on mutual respect and solidarity and consistent with international human rights obligations in order to guarantee a safe European society; whereas such a policy must respect fundamental rights, include the fight against discrimination, racism and xenophobia and regulate migration on a global, balanced and humane basis,
ker se rok za prenos Direktive Sveta 2003/109/ES z dne 25. novembra 2003 o statusu državljanov tretjih držav, ki so rezidenti za daljši čas UL L 16, 23.1.2004, str.
whereas the deadline for transposition of Council Directive 2003/109/EC of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents OJ L 16, 23.1.2004, p.
, izteče 23. januarja 2006 in ker ta direktiva določa, da v primeru, ko državljan tretje države že pet let zakonito prebiva v državi članici EU, lahko pridobi status rezidenta za daljši čas in posledično pravico do bivanja v drugi državi članici EU,
will expire on 23 January 2006, and whereas that directive provides that, if a third-country national has resided legally in a Member State for five years, he or she may acquire long-term resident status and consequently the right to reside in another Member State,
ker predstavlja priseljevanje iz ekonomskih razlogov za Evropsko unijo velik izziv, ki zahteva skupen pristop namesto zgolj nacionalnega pogleda na priseljensko vprašanje,
whereas immigration on economic grounds represents a major challenge to the European Union which calls for a common approach rather than a strictly national view of the migration issue,
ker se je izkazalo, da ima priseljevanje pozitivne učinke na trg dela (dinamičnost) in bi zato moralo biti sprejeto kot priložnost, ne pa kot varnostno vprašanje;
whereas immigration has proven to have positive effects on the labour market (dynamism) and should therefore be welcomed as an opportunity, rather than defined as a security issue,
ker mora biti politika ekonomskih migracij povezana z lizbonsko strategijo in evropsko strategijo zaposlovanja,
whereas economic migration policies should be linked to the Lisbon Strategy and the European Employment Strategy,
v prepričanju, da morajo ukrepe za urejanje zakonitega priseljevanja in vključevanja spremljati ukrepi za zavarovanje zunanjih meja, politika vračanja in ukrepi za boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in trgovini z ljudmi ter izkoriščanju priseljencev za nezakonito zaposlovanje,
convinced that measures to regulate legal immigration and integration must be accompanied by measures to secure external borders, a return policy and measures to combat illegal immigration and human trafficking and the exploitation of immigrants in illegal employment,
v prepričanju, da je za uspeh politike zakonitega priseljevanja potrebno izvajati tudi celovito in bolj proaktivno strategijo za doseganje popolnega vključevanja, ki zajema vrsto socialnih, gospodarskih in civilnodružbenih ukrepov, kakor tudi programe uvajanja in učenje jezika, s tem da se politiki priseljevanja in vključevanja ne smeta obravnavati ločeno,
convinced that a successful policy of legal immigration also depends on the implementation of a comprehensive and more pro-active strategy to achieve full integration, covering a range of social, economic and civic measures, as well as introduction programmes and language training, given that immigration and integration policies must not be considered separately,
ker je bistveno za vse priseljence, ki zakonito prebivajo na ozemlju Evropske unije v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah, zagotoviti polno spoštovanje pravice do družinskega življenja, in ker je potrebno pregledati Direktivo Sveta 2003/86/ES z dne 22. septembra 2003 o pravici do združitve družine 1 UL L 251, 3.10.2003, str.
whereas it is essential to guarantee full respect for the right to family life for all immigrants legally resident on EU territory, pursuant to the European Convention on Human Rights, and whereas it is necessary to revise Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification OJ L 251, 3.10.2003, p.
z namenom, da se zagotovi spoštovanje te pravice,
in order to ensure that this right is respected,
zavedajoč se, da je sodelovanje med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami ter matičnimi državami zelo pomembno in ga mora spremljati prava politika sorazvoja,
aware that cooperation between the European Union and its Member States and countries of origin is of major importance and needs to be accompanied by a genuine policy for codevelopment,
ker morajo vse države članice ratificirati Mednarodno konvencijo o varovanju pravic vseh delavcev migrantov in članov njihovih družin,
whereas all Member States should ratify the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families,
ker je nezakonito delo največ, kar priseljenci lahko pričakujejo, in bi zato morale države članice združiti napore, da se soočijo z nezakonitim zaposlovanjem, in osebe, ki zaposlujejo nezakonite priseljence, od tega odvračajo in kaznujejo,
whereas illegal employment is the greatest draw for illegal immigration, and therefore Member States should step up efforts to tackle illegal employment and to deter and punish persons who employ illegal migrants,
obžaluje, da se je Svet odločil ohraniti soglasno odločanje in postopek posvetovanja na celotnem področju zakonitega priseljevanja; meni, nasprotno, da je edina pot za sprejetje učinkovite in pregledne zakonodaje na tem področju možna v okviru postopka soodločanja;
Regrets that the Council has decided to maintain unanimity and the consultation procedure in the whole area of legal immigration; however, believes that only by means of the codecision procedure will it be possible to adopt effective and transparent legislation in that field;
opozarja, da so priseljenci ogromno prispevali in še prispevajo k blaginji ter gospodarskemu, kulturnemu in socialnemu razvoju držav članic EU;
Recalls that migrants have made a major contribution to the prosperity and the economic, cultural and social development of the Member States, and continue to do so;