natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se mu ne zdi primerno podrediti delovanja Parlamenta pravilom ravnanja, ki bi urejali njegovo komuniciranje z državljani EU;
Does not consider it appropriate to submit Parliament to a code of conduct that regulates its communication with EU citizens;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, ki bo določal skupna načela sodelovanja med evropskimi institucijami na področju komuniciranja;
Asks the Commission to propose a draft interinstitutional agreement defining the common principles that could channel cooperation between the European institutions as regards communication;
poziva Komisijo, naj razišče možnosti za začetek izvajanja resničnega programa Skupnosti za informiranje in komuniciranje o Evropi, s čimer bi izboljšala obstoječe medinstitucionalne mehanizme s tega področja; izjavlja, da bo v primeru, če bo Komisija predstavila ustrezen predlog, Parlament dejavno sodeloval pri opredelitvi in podrobnem oblikovanju vsebine in obsega programa;
Urges the Commission to explore the possibility of launching of a genuine Community programme, for information and communication on Europe, in order to improve existing interinstitutional partnership mechanisms in this field; states that should the Commission come forward with a corresponding proposal, Parliament will be fully involved in defining and framing the precise content and scope of the programme;
je prepričan, da se je za določitev obsega evropske komunikacijske politike treba odločneje sklicevati na načela in vrednote, podane v Listini o temeljnih pravicah;
Is of the opinion that stronger reference be made to the principles and values enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights in order to determine the scope of a European communication policy;
želi spomniti, da so v Listini o temeljnih pravicah že opredeljene pravice državljanov na področju informiranja in da bi morali z vsakim novim instrumentom spoštovati posebne pravice Parlamenta, ki je izvoljena skupščina, zlasti njegovo pooblastilo, da prosto naslavlja državljane celotne Unije; poziva odbor, ki je pristojen za ustavne zadeve, naj preuči možno obliko in vsebino takšnega medinstitucionalnega instrumenta;
Stresses that the Charter of Fundamental Rights already lays down citizens' rights regarding information and that any new instrument should respect the prerogatives of Parliament as an elected assembly, in particular its power to freely address citizens from across the Union; calls for its Committee on Constitutional Affairs to examine the possible form and content of an interinstitutional instrument of this kind;
poudarja, da je ustava za Evropo pomembna, saj bi Unija dobila bolj političen in bolj demokratičen značaj, za državljane pa bi postala privlačnejša; želi spomniti na politično odgovornost, ki jo imajo za podporo temu procesu Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija;
Points to the importance of a Constitution for Europe to make the Union more political and democratic and capable of attracting citizens; points out that Parliament, the Council, and the Commission have a political responsibility to support this process;
pozdravlja željo Komisije, da Evropo vključi na vse ravni, oziroma da evropska vprašanja prenese na nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne ravni, da bi bilo sporočilo bolj decentralizirano, ter vztraja, da mora komuniciranje potekati redno; pozdravlja akcijski načrt Komisije in pričakuje njegovo takojšnjo izvedbo;
Welcomes the desire shown by the Commission to take Europe to all levels, in other words, to communicate European issues to national, regional and local level in order to decentralise the message, and insists on the need for such communication to take place on a very regular basis; welcomes the Commission's Action Plan and expects its prompt implementation;
meni, da bi razvoj evropske uprave na lokalni ravni, ki bi bila sposobna podpreti številne že obstoječe informacijske točke Evropske unije, pripomogel k vzpostavitvi močnih neposrednih povezav med Unijo in njenimi državljani, še zlasti z izboljšanjem dostopa državljanov do evropskih pobud in programov, ki jih zadevajo; meni, da imajo pri tem pomembno vlogo informacijske pisarne Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta; v zvezi s tem ocenjuje, da je treba ponovno temeljito razmisliti o dosedanjem delu teh informacijskih pisarn, saj njihova politika odnosov z javnostmi ne upošteva interesov državljanov in bi se sredstva za ta namen lahko izkoristila mnogo bolj učinkovito; zato želi, da bi pisarne imele bolj aktiven in manj birokratski značaj;
Considers that the development of a local European administration, able to support the numerous existing European Union information points, would help to form strong direct links between the Union and its citizens, in particular by improving citizens" access to the European initiatives and programmes that affect them; believes that the Commission's and Parliament's information offices in the Member States play an important role in this connection; sees a need in this connection for a thoroughgoing review and rethink of the work carried out to date in the Member States by these information offices, since their public relations activities do not appeal to citizens and the resources earmarked for them could be used far more efficiently; feels, therefore, that they should be more political and less bureaucratic;
pozdravlja pobudo za preglednost, ki jo je dala Komisija novembra 2005 in v kateri poudarja, da so visoki standardi preglednosti ena od legitimnih pravic vseh oblik sodobnega upravljanja; evropski državljani imajo pravico do učinkovitih in odgovornih javnih institucij, ki so pripravljene ustreči;
Welcomes the transparency initiative launched by the Commission in November 2005, which stresses that high standards of transparency are part of the legitimacy of any modern administration; the European public is entitled to expect efficient, accountable and service-minded public institutions;
se mu zdijo regije in mesta najbolj primerna ploščad za širjenje zamisli o Evropi med državljani in poziva Odbor regij k sodelovanju pri izvajanju bodoče komunikacijske politike;
Sees regions and cities as the most suitable platforms for promoting the idea of Europe among citizens and calls for the involvement of the Committee of the Regions in the implementation of a future communication policy;
podpira idejo okrepitve razprav v nacionalnih in regionalnih parlamentih;
Supports the idea of enhancing debates in national and regional parliaments;
vzpodbuja nacionalne parlamente, naj okrepijo nadzorno vlogo nad delom svojih vlad v Svetu in tako dvignejo osveščenost ter s tem demokratično odgovornost institucij EU;
Encourages the national parliaments to enhance the scrutiny role of their governments when they act at the Council, thus raising awareness and thereby the democratic accountability of the EU institutions;
poudarja, da si morajo nacionalni parlamenti prizadevati, da evropskim zakonodajnim načrtom posvetijo večjo pozornost veliko bolj zgodaj v procesu odločanja;
Stresses that national parliaments should strive to pay more attention to European legislative projects much earlier in the decision-making process;
opominjajoč na sklepe predsedstva konference predsednikov nacionalnih parlamentov Evropske unije (Budimpešta, 6. in 7. maja 2005), v katerih predsedstvo poziva nacionalne parlamente, naj vsako leto izvedejo razprave, najbolje na plenarnih zasedanjih, o letnem zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Evropske komisije,
Draws attention to the Presidency Conclusions of the Conference of the Speakers of European Union Parliaments (Budapest, 6 and 7 May 2005), which called upon the national parliaments to hold an annual debate, preferably in plenary session, on the Commission's annual legislative and work programme;
poudarja, da je treba sklicati medparlamentarne forume o prihodnosti Evrope, pri čemer bo eden izmed njih sklican ob 50. obletnici Rimske pogodbe; zahteva, da se pri evropski komunikacijski politiki upoštevajo razprave na ravni predstavnikov evropskega prebivalstva;
Points to the importance of convening interparliamentary forums on the future of Europe, one of which will be meeting to mark the 50th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome; calls, as far as European communication policy is concerned, for the discussions among the representatives of the European people to be taken into account;
izpostavlja pomen državljanske vzgoje o integraciji EU; meni, da je določena stopnja razumevanja Evrope predpogoj za uspešno interaktivno komunikacijo med državljani in EU ter lahko prispeva k razvijanju občutka evropskega državljanstva;
Underlines the importance of civic education on EU integration; considers that having a certain level of understanding about Europe is a prerequisite for successful interactive communication with the EU, and for contributing to a sense of European citizenship;
obžaluje zmanjševanje podpore sektorskim programom z mnogokratnimi učinki, kot so Leonardo da Vinci, Socrates in Erasmus, saj poudarjajo evropsko razsežnost in olajšujejo vzpostavitev nadnacionalnih omrežij;
Regrets that support for sectoral programmes with a strong multiplier effect such as Leonardo da Vinci, Socrates and Erasmus has been cut, since they accentuate the European dimension and facilitate the establishment of transnational networks;
meni, da je državljane moč doseči z boljšo komunikacijo in ponazoritvijo koristnosti odločitev EU za vsakdanje življenje preko sodelovanja z regionalnimi in lokalnimi institucijami; predlaga, da je treba dati poudarek rednemu obveščanju državljanov o ustreznih regionalnih in lokalnih projektih, pri katerih je sodelovala EU, s ciljem spodbujanja skupnega evropskega projekta;
Is of the opinion that in order to reach the citizen, it is important to communicate better and show the relevance and impact of EU decisions for daily life through cooperation with regional and local institutions; suggests that emphasis be placed on communicating regularly to the citizens about relevant regional and local projects in which the EU has participated, with the objective of favouring a common European project;
meni, da bi bilo pri razpravi treba upoštevati posebne potrebe in dejavnosti invalidov in manjšin, pa tudi nacionalnega in lokalnega občinstva ter specifičnih ciljnih skupin; opozarja, da bi bilo treba večjo pozornost nameniti usmerjanju bistvenih informacij in tudi informacij, vezanih na posamezne regije, k določenemu ciljnemu občinstvu, pri čemer je treba evropska vprašanja povezati z vsakdanjim življenjem državljanov;
Considers that the debate should take into account the specific needs and activities of disabled people and minority groups as well as national and local audiences and specific target groups; points out that more attention should be paid to channelling relevant, as well as regionalised information, to defined target audiences, thereby connecting European issues with citizens' daily lives;
pozdravlja pobude, ki so jih sprejela nekatera predstavništva Komisije in nacionalne uprave za sodelovanje pri informacijskih kampanjah o EU; opozarja, da takšno sodelovanje lahko prispeva k oblikovanju bolj neposredne povezave med državljani in institucijami;
Welcomes the initiatives taken by certain Commission representations and by national administrations so as to collaborate on EU-related information campaigns; points out that such collaboration could contribute to the creation of a more direct link between citizens and institutions;
poziva Komisijo, naj že na začetku oblikovanja politike omogoči posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi in javnostjo; meni, da bi lahko k presoji vplivov bistvenih predlogov dodali natančno opredelitev, kako so bili pri oblikovanju predloga upoštevani pomisleki državljanov; opozarja, da bi bilo treba pojasniti vpliv javnih posvetovanj na postopek odločanja EU;
Calls on the Commission to ensure consultation with stakeholders and the public at an early stage of policy shaping; considers that key proposals could be accompanied by an additional section in the impact assessment specifying how citizens´ concerns have been taken into account when drafting the proposal; points out that the impact of public consultations on the EU's decision-making process should be clarified;
poziva Komisijo, naj razvije dinamično in odzivno komunikacijsko politiko, ki se bo namesto na poročanje o na koncu doseženem soglasju bolj osredotočala na poročanje o tem, kako pride do odločitev, sprejetih na različnih stopnjah procesa odločanja; meni, da je cilj komunikacijske politike EU posredovanje jasnega razumevanja državljanom o tem, kako nastaja evropska zakonodaja;
Calls on the Commission to develop a dynamic and reactive communication policy, which, instead of mostly reporting the final consensus achieved, is more focused on reporting the evolution of decisions that are adopted at different stages in the decision-making process; considers that the aim of the Union's communication policy is to give citizens a clear understanding of how European law is made;
Sodelovanje z mediji in delo z novimi tehnologijami
Working with the media and new technologies
poudarja pomen medijev kot posrednikov, oblikovalcev mnenj in prenašalcev sporočil državljanom v evropskem javnem prostoru, ki ga Komisija želi razviti; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj podpre konkretne pobude, kot so forumi za razpravo o evropskih kulturnih in političnih vprašanjih, na katerih bi bili dokumenti na voljo v več jezikih, da bi lahko veliko evropskih državljanov sodelovalo v razpravi in izmenjalo svoje poglede;
Stresses the importance of the media as intermediaries, opinion formers, and carriers of messages to the citizen in the European public sphere which the Commission is aiming to develop; in that context, urges the Commission to support concrete initiatives such as discussion forums on European cultural and political issues where materials would be available in several languages so that many European citizens could interact and exchange;
poudarja, da je obveščen državljan temelj za delovanje participativnega demokratičnega sistema;
Emphasises that the informed citizen is the basis of a functioning participatory democratic system;
prosi Komisijo, naj čim bolj natančno opredeli vlogo, ki jo želi dati medijem, in naj sestavi načrt, ki v komunikacijsko politiko bolj tesno vključuje nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne medije, pri čemer je treba kot področje komuniciranja vključiti tudi alternativne medije;
Asks the Commission to define, with the greatest precision possible, which role it would like to assign to the media and stresses the need to find a formula that involves national, regional and local media more closely in communication policy, for which the use of alternative media as a communication channel should also be considered;
meni, da je treba okrepiti čezmejno sodelovanje med regionalnimi in lokalnimi mediji v zvezi z evropskimi političnimi vprašanji; meni tudi, da evropsko sodelovanje medijev in novinarjev pripomore k obveščanju o Evropski uniji in poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru proračuna ustanovi "evropski sklad za (preiskovalno) novinarstvo", ki bo podpiral projekte, v okviru katerih bodo novinarji iz različnih držav članic skupaj poglobljeno obravnavali določeno evropsko temo in jo prenesli v različne lokalne in regionalne okoliščine;
Takes the view that cross-border cooperation on European policy projects between regional and local media must be stepped up; believes that European cooperation between media and journalists benefits reporting on the European Union, and asks the Commission to set up, as part of the budget, a European Fund for (Investigative) Journalism that supports projects in which journalists from several Member States together explore a European subject in depth and apply it to the differences in local and regional situations;
pozdravlja umik predloga o ustanovitvi tiskovne agencije EU;
Welcomes the withdrawal of the proposal on the creation of an EU news agency;
priporoča redno izmenjavo mnenj med evropskimi institucijami, zlasti s Parlamentom, in mediji o vprašanjih komuniciranja EU;
Recommends the creation of regular exchanges of views on European communication matters between the European institutions, particularly Parliament, and the media;
se mu zdi na splošno odgovornost Komisije in zlasti držav članic, da posredujejo objektivne, zanesljive in nepristranske informacije o evropski politiki kot temelj za razpravo na podlagi točnih informacij; zato države članice poziva, naj okrepijo obveščenost svojih uradnikov o politiki, ki se izvaja na evropski ravni;
Sees it as the responsibility of the Commission in general, and the Member States in particular, to provide objective, reliable and impartial information on European policies as a basis for well-informed debate; accordingly calls on the latter to improve efforts to inform the Member States" civil servants about policies conducted at European level;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bela knjiga z vidika novih tehnologih usklajena z zadnjim poročilom Parlamenta o informacijski in komunikacijski strategiji EU;
Welcomes the fact that with respect to the new technologies, the White Paper is in line with Parliament's last report on the EU information and communication strategy;
pozitivno ocenjuje predloge Komisije za boljšo uporabo novih komunikacijskih tehnologij, vendar zahteva sprejetje ukrepov, s katerimi se bo preprečilo, da s "številčno razdrobitvijo" določen del državljanov ne bo še bolj izključen iz dostopa do informacij o Uniji; s tega vidika in zaradi globalnega pristopa poudarja, da je treba vključiti za različne institucije specifična sredstva komuniciranja, kakršna je bodoča "spletna TV" Evropskega parlamenta, ob hkratnem spoštovanju njegove avtonomije; razen tega poudarja, da morajo tradicionalna sredstva množične komunikacije, kot je televizija, izboljšati svojo kakovost;
Welcomes the Commission's proposals for a better use of new communication technologies, but calls for measures to be taken to prevent the "digital divide" making access to information about the Union even more difficult for a section of the population; underlines the need, in the interests of ensuring a coherent approach, to incorporate the means of communication peculiar to each institution, such as Parliament's planned "Web TV", while respecting its autonomy; maintains also that the traditional mass media, such as television, must be turned to account;
naroča Komisiji, naj Parlament obvešča o presoji posvetovanj, ki jih je izvedla;
Asks the Commission to inform Parliament about the assessment of the consultation it has undertaken;
se mu zdi vprašljiva ustanovitev Observatorija za evropsko javno mnenje v bližnji prihodnosti in meni, da bi morali pred tem bolj usklajeno uporabljati že razpoložljive podatke in vire;
Sees as questionable the establishment of an Observatory for European Public Opinion in the short term and considers that before such a task is carried out, more coordinated use should be made of the data and resources already available;
ugotavlja, da je treba za zadovoljivo komunikacijsko politiko natančno poznati pomanjkljivosti podatkov, ki so na voljo državljanom Unije, v zvezi z vsebino ukrepov Skupnosti ali institucijami in postopki, ki omogočajo njeno izvajanje; zato zahteva, da službe za pripravo eurobarometra izvedejo specifično in izčrpno javnomnenjsko raziskavo, ki bo omogočila sprejetje ukrepa, ki je natančen in prilagojen ravni informiranosti državljanov Skupnosti glede na njihovo matično državo, socialno-poklicno kategorijo in politično usmerjenost;
Notes that no satisfactory communication policy is possible without exact knowledge of the gaps in the information which Union citizens have, whether relating to the substance of Community action or to the institutions and procedures that serve to implement it; calls, therefore for Eurobarometer personnel to be instructed to carry out an exhaustive specific opinion survey in order to gauge exactly how well informed Community citizens are, distinguishing them according to their country of origin, socio-professional category, and political leanings;
naroča Komisiji, naj oblikuje konkretne predloge za izvajanje komunikacijske politike ter ovrednoti njene pravne in finančne vidike;
Asks the Commission to draw up concrete proposals for the implementation of the communication policy and to evaluate its legal and financial implications;
meni, da je treba analizirati delo Medinstitucionalne skupine za informiranje (IGI), da bi našli možne izboljšave;
Considers that the work of the Interinstitutional Group on Information (IGI) should be analysed to see if improvements are possible;
poudarja, da morajo vseevropske politične stranke glede EU tematike bolj poglobljeno sodelovati v dialogu s svojimi volilnimi bazami;
Stresses the need for closer involvement of pan-European political parties in dialogue with their constituencies on EU matters;
poudarja poseben pomen vloge, ki jo imajo politične stranke v zvezi z naklonjenostjo parlamentarni demokraciji na vseh ravneh; obžaluje, da zmogljivost nadnacionalnih političnih strank ostaja neizkoriščena; obžaluje, da veliko število nacionalnih političnih strank ne želi sprejeti evropske razsežnosti na dosleden in prepričljiv način; poziva politične stranke, da pri odločanju in v volilnih kampanjah upoštevajo evropska vprašanja ter da evropskim državljanom dejansko ponudijo možnosti odločanja o prihodnosti Evrope;
Attaches special importance to the role of political parties in sustaining parliamentary democracy at all levels; regrets that the potential of the transnational political parties remains unfulfilled; deplores the reluctance of many national political parties to embrace the European dimension in a coherent or convincing way; urges political parties to address EU politics in their policy-making and electoral campaigning, and to promote on behalf of the citizen real political choices about the future of Europe;
poudarja, da mora komunikacijska politika upoštevati poseben "časovni ritem" odvijanja evropskih zadev, ki je pogosto različen od političnih dnevnih redov posameznih držav ter dejansko ne more nastati nepovezano s politiko in dejanskimi ukrepi Evropske unije, ki imajo svoj neodvisen časovni razpored; zato meni, da bi se morali Komisija, Svet in Parlament uskladiti glede časovnega razporeda obravnavanja "velikih dosjejev", za katere se pričakuje zanimanje evropskega javnega mnenja, da bi tako lahko uskladili svoja prizadevanja za komuniciranje o omenjenih vprašanjih;
Emphasises that a communication policy must take into account the 'pace' of European affairs, which is often far removed from that of national political agendas, and cannot really develop separately from the specific Union policies and measures, which each have their own particular timetable; considers that the Commission, the Council, and Parliament should agree on a timetable for the key issues likely to be of more direct interest to the different sections of European public opinion in order to channel their communication efforts into these subjects;
poziva institucije, naj preučijo možnost oblikovanja koordinacijske skupine na drugi stopnji, v kateri bi bili zastopani pristojni generalni direktorati različnih institucij ter predstavniki odborov Parlamenta in katere cilj bi bil usklajevanje konkretnih dejavnosti pri izvajanju smernic IGI;
Calls on the institutions to examine the possibility of setting up a second-level coordination group, on which the competent DGs of the various institutions and representatives of Parliament's committees are represented, to coordinate the specific activities implementing the guidelines laid down by the IGI;