natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da ima zgolj federalna raven pristojnosti za odnose med EU in Kanado, pozdravlja pa sodelovanje provinc in ozemelj pri pogajanjih o celovitem gospodarskem in trgovinskem sporazumu ter pri nekaterih drugih vidikih odnosov med EU in Kanado;
Notes that competence for EU-Canada relations resides at the federal level alone, but welcomes the participation of the provinces and territories in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement negotiations and in some other aspects of EU-Canada relations;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, predsedstvu EU, podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter kanadski vladi.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the rotating EU Presidency, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Canadian Government.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije Svetu, naj odobri začetek pogajanj o sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah Ministrstvu za finance Združenih držav za preprečevanje terorizma oziroma njegovega financiranja in boj proti njemu SEC(2010)0315 konč.
having regard to the Recommendation from the Commission to the Council to authorise the opening of negotiations for an agreement between the European Union and the United States of America to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial payment messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing SEC(2010)0315 final.
ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 11. februarja 2010 o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah iz Evropske unije Združenim državam Amerike za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti (05305/1/2010 REV 1 – C7-0004/2010 – 2009/0190(NLE)) Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0029 .
having regard to its legislative resolution of 11 February 2010 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Financial Messaging Data from the European Union to the United States for purposes of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (05305/1/2010 REV 1 – C7-0004/2010 – 2009/0190(NLE)) Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0029 .
ob upoštevanju zahteve po soglasju, ki jo je predložil Svet v skladu s členom 218(6)(a) v povezavi s členoma 82(1)(d) in 87(2)(a) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0004/2010 ),
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 218 (6)(a) in conjunction with Articles 82(1)(d) and 87(2)(a) of the TFEU ( C7-0004/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. septembra 2009 o načrtovanem mednarodnem sporazumu o dostopu ministrstva za finance Združenih držav Amerike do podatkov o finančnih sporočilih o plačilih za preprečevanje terorizma oziroma njegovega financiranja in boj proti njemu Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0016 .
having regard to its resolution of 17 September 2009 on the envisaged international agreement to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial payment messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0016 .
ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2009)0703 in 05305/1/2010 REV 1),
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2009)0703 and 05305/1/2010 REV 1),
ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 12. aprila 2010 (omejeno),
having regard to the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 12 April 2010 (restricted),
ker je pozdravil sporazum o medsebojni pravni pomoči med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike in washingtonsko deklaracijo o krepitvi čezatlantskega sodelovanja na področju pravice, svobode in varnosti v povezavi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, ki jo je 28. oktobra 2009 sprejela ministrska trojka PNZ EU-ZDA,
whereas it welcomed the Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance between the European Union and the United States of America and the ‘Washington Declaration’, as adopted at the EU-US JHA Ministerial Troika on 28 October 2009, on enhancing transatlantic cooperation in the area of Justice, Freedom and Security within a context of respect for human rights and civil liberties,
ker pripisuje velik pomen potrebi po čezatlantskem sodelovanju,
whereas it places strong emphasis on the need for transatlantic cooperation,
ker je Svet 30. novembra 2009 podpisal začasni sporazum med EU in ZDA o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah za namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, ki naj bi se poskusno izvajal od 1. februarja 2010 do najpozneje 31. oktobra 2010, ko preneha veljati,
whereas on 30 November 2009 the Council signed an EU-US interim agreement on the processing and transfer of financial messaging data (FMDA) for the purposes of the US Terrorist Finance Tracking Program (TFTP) to be provisionally applied as from 1 February 2010 and expire on 31 October 2010 at the latest,
ker je bilo v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo za uradno sklenitev tega začasnega sporazuma potrebno njegovo soglasje,
whereas under the Treaty of Lisbon its consent to the formal conclusion of this interim agreement was required,
ker je 11. februarja 2010 sklenil, da ne bo dal soglasja k sklenitvi začasnega sporazuma o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah,
whereas on 11 February 2010 it decided to withhold its consent to the conclusion of the FMDA,
ker je od Komisije zahteval, naj Svetu nemudoma predloži priporočila za sklenitev dolgoročnega sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o preprečevanju financiranja terorizma,
whereas it requested the Commission immediately to submit recommendations to the Council with a view to a long-term agreement with the United States dealing with the prevention of terrorism financing,
ker je poudaril, da bi morali novi sporazumi na tem področju izpolnjevati zahteve novega pravnega okvira, vzpostavljenega z Lizbonsko pogodbo in sedaj zavezujočo Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
whereas it reiterated that any new agreement in this area should comply with the new legal framework established by the Treaty of Lisbon and the now binding Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ker je ponovno izrazil zahteve iz resolucije z dne 17. septembra 2009, zlasti tiste iz odstavkov 7 do 13,
whereas it renewed the requests made in its resolution of 17 September 2009, particularly those in paragraphs 7 to 13,
ker je Komisija 24. marca 2010 sprejela nova priporočila in pogajalske direktive v zvezi s programom za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti,
whereas the Commission adopted the new TFTP Recommendation and Negotiating Directives on 24 March 2010,
ker se od Sveta pričakuje, da bo 22. aprila 2010 sprejel odločitev o sprejetju pogajalskih direktiv,
whereas the Council is expected to take a decision on the adoption of the Negotiating Directives on 22 April 2010,
ker se v pogajalskih direktivah odsevajo pomembni elementi iz ustreznih resolucij Evropskega parlamenta na to temo,
whereas the Negotiating Directives reflect important elements contained in the relevant European Parliament resolutions on this issue,
pozdravlja novi duh sodelovanja, ki ga izkazujeta Komisija in Svet, ter njuno pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Parlamentom, pri čemer upoštevata obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Pogodbe, in sicer da morata nemudoma in izčrpno obveščati Parlament v vseh fazah postopka; ponovno izraža pripravljenost sprejeti sporazum, ki bi pomagal Evropi in Združenim državam Amerike, da v interesu varnosti državljanov okrepijo boj proti terorizmu, ne da bi spodkopali načela pravne države;
Welcomes the new spirit of cooperation demonstrated by the Commission and the Council and their willingness to engage with Parliament, taking into account their Treaty obligation to keep Parliament immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure; reiterates its openness to an agreement which would help both Europe and the United States strengthen their fight against terrorism in the interests of the security of their citizens, without undermining the rule of law;
računa, da se bodo predanost, duh plodnega sodelovanja in poštenost, ki so jih izkazali predstavniki vlade ZDA pred glasovanjem Parlamenta 11. februarja 2010 in po njem, nadaljevali tudi v prihodnje;
Counts on a continuation of the commitment, spirit of constructive cooperation and fairness demonstrated by representatives of the US Government in the run-up to Parliament's vote on 11 February 2010 and thereafter;
opozarja, da je trdno odločen napovedati boj proti terorizmu in prepričan, da je treba dodatno razviti in izboljšati okvir za čezatlantsko sodelovanje v namene boja proti terorizmu; obenem meni, da so evropske zakonske zahteve za pošteno, sorazmerno in zakonito obdelavo osebnih podatkov bistvenega pomena in jih je treba vedno spoštovati;
Recalls its strong determination to fight terrorism and its conviction that the framework of transatlantic cooperation for counter-terrorism purposes should be further developed and improved; believes, at the same time, that European legal requirements for the fair, proportionate and lawful processing of personal information are of paramount importance and must always be upheld;
poudarja, da predpisi EU o sledenju dejavnosti za financiranje terorizma temeljijo na poročanju o sumljivih ali nepravilnih transakcijah, ki ga opravljajo posamezni finančni subjekti;
Reiterates that the EU's rules on the tracking of terrorist financing activities are based on the reporting of suspicious or irregular transactions by individual financial operators;
poudarja, da mora EU še zmeraj določiti temeljna načela in navesti, kako bo v splošnem sodelovala z ZDA na področju boja proti terorizmu in kako bi bilo mogoče ponudnike storitev na področju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah prositi za pomoč pri tem boju, oziroma splošneje, kako podatke, zbrane v komercialne namene, uporabiti pri kazenskem pregonu;
Emphasises that fundamental principles still need to be laid down by the EU stating how it will generally cooperate with the US for counter-terrorism purposes and how financial messaging data providers could be asked to contribute to this fight, or indeed more generally to the use in connection with law enforcement of data collected for commercial purposes;
ponovno opozarja na „omejitev namena“ sporazuma, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bi bila vsakršna izmenjava podatkov strogo omejena na zadeve, nujno potrebne za namene boja proti terorizmu, in da bi izmenjava potekala na podlagi skupne opredelitve sestavnih elementov „teroristične dejavnosti“;
Reiterates its emphasis on the ‘purpose limitation’ of the agreement in order to ensure that any exchange of information is strictly limited to that required for the purposes of combating terrorism and that this is done on the basis of a common definition of what constitutes ‘terrorist activity’;
poudarja, da sta načeli sorazmernosti in nujnosti osrednjega pomena za načrtovani sporazum, in opozarja, da težave ponudnikov storitev na področju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah, ki (zaradi tehničnih in/ali upravljavskih razlogov) ne morejo iskati po vsebini sporočil, zato se podatki posredujejo v večjih količinah, ni mogoče odpraviti naknadno z nadzornimi in kontrolnimi mehanizmi, saj so takrat temeljna načela zakonodaje o varstvu podatkov že prekršena;
Stresses that the principles of proportionality and necessity are key to the envisaged agreement, and points out that the problem that financial messaging data providers are unable (for technical and/or governance reasons) to search the ‘content’ of the messages, leading to the transfer of data in bulk, cannot subsequently be rectified by oversight and control mechanisms, since basic principles of data protection law have already been compromised;
še vedno meni, da prenos podatkov v večjih količinah pomeni odstopanje od načel, na katerih temeljita zakonodaja in praksa EU, ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj se v pogajanjih ustrezno posvetita tej težavi, pri tem pa upoštevata, da je program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti sedaj oblikovan tako, da ne dovoljuje ciljno usmerjene izmenjave podatkov; rešitve bi morale zajemati omejitev obsega prenesenih podatkov in izpis vrste podatkov, ki jih lahko namenski ponudniki filtrirajo in izluščijo, pa tudi vrste podatkov, ki utegnejo biti vključeni v prenos;
Reiterates its opinion that bulk data transfers mark a departure from the principles underpinning EU legislation and practice, and asks the Commission and Council to address this issue properly in the negotiations, bearing in mind that the TFTP is currently designed in such a way that it does not allow for targeted data exchange; solutions should include restricting the scope of the transferred data and listing the types of data that the designated providers are able to filter and extract, as well as the types of data which may be included in a transfer;
meni, da sporazum o medsebojni pravni pomoči ni zadostna podlaga za zahteve po pridobivanju podatkov v namene programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, še posebej zato, ker ne velja za bančna nakazila med tretjimi državami in ker bi bila v vsakem primeru potrebna predhodna identifikacija določene banke, program za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti pa temelji na ciljno usmerjenem iskanju prenosov sredstev; v prihodnje se morajo pogajanja osredotočiti na iskanje rešitve, s katero bi postal prvi način združljiv z drugim;
Considers that the Agreement on Mutual Legal Assistance is not an adequate basis for requests to obtain data for the purposes of the TFTP, in particular because it does not apply to bank transfers between third countries and because it would, in any case, require the prior identification of a specific bank, whereas the TFTP is based on targeted searches of fund transfers; future negotiations should focus on finding a solution to make one compatible with the other;
meni, da je treba po vzpostavitvi mandata v EU imenovati javni pravosodni organ, katerega naloga bi bila sprejemanje zahtev finančnega ministrstva Združenih držav Amerike; poudarja, da je treba obvezno jasno opredeliti naravo tega organa in ureditev za pravosodni nadzor;
Takes this view that, once a mandate has been established, a judicial public authority should be designated in the EU with the responsibility to receive requests from the United States Treasury Department; points out that it is crucial that the nature of this authority and the judicial oversight arrangements should be clearly defined;
zato odločno poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj raziščeta načine za vzpostavitev preglednega in zakonitega postopka za odobritev prenosa in zajemanja ustreznih podatkov ter za izvajanje izmenjave podatkov in nadzor nad njo; poudarja, da je treba pri sprejemanju navedenih ukrepov v celoti upoštevati načela nujnosti in sorazmernosti, pravne države ter dosledno spoštovati zahteve zakonodaje EU v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami, odgovornost pa predati evropskemu organu, kar bi omogočilo izvajanje ustrezne evropske zakonodaje v polnem obsegu;
Urges the Council and Commission, therefore, to explore ways of establishing a transparent and legally sound procedure for the authorisation of the transfer and extraction of relevant data as well as for the conduct and supervision of data exchanges; emphasises that such steps are to be taken in full compliance with the principles of necessity and proportionality and the rule of law with full respect for fundamental rights requirements under EU law, by giving a role to a European authority, which would make it possible for relevant European legislation to become fully applicable;
če kratkoročno ne bo mogoče izpeljati zgoraj navedenih postopkov, vztraja pri dvotirnem pristopu, ki bi razlikoval med strogimi varovali, vključenimi v predvideni sporazum EU-ZDA, na eni strani ter temeljnimi dolgoročnimi političnimi odločitvami, ki se jim mora posvetiti EU, na drugi strani; znova poudarja, da mora vsak sporazum med EU in ZDA vsebovati stroga izvedbena in nadzorna varovala, s pomočjo katerih bi ustrezen organ, ki ga imenuje EU, lahko spremljal, kako oblasti ZDA vsakodnevno zajemajo, uporabljajo in dostopajo do vseh podatkov, ki so jim posredovani v skladu s sporazumom;
Insists, if the above arrangements are not feasible in the short term, on a twin-track approach which differentiates between, on the one hand, the strict safeguards to be included in the envisaged EU-US agreement, and, on the other, the fundamental longer-term policy decisions that the EU must address; emphasises once again that any agreement between the EU and the US must include strict implementation and supervision safeguards, monitored by an appropriate EU-appointed authority, on the day-to-day extraction of, access to and use by the US authorities of all data transferred to them under the agreement;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi največjo stopnjo jamstva dalo pridobivanje podatkov na ozemlju EU, v skupnih EU-ZDA objektih, in Komisijo in Svet prosi, naj obenem preučita:
In this respect, points out that the option offering the highest level of guarantees would be to allow for the extraction of data to take place on EU soil, in EU or Joint EU-US facilities, and asks the Commission and the Council to explore, in parallel:
načine, ki bi omogočili prehod na srednjeročno rešitev in bi sodno oblast EU pooblastili za nadzor nad pridobivanjem podatkov v EU, v imenu držav članic, po vmesnem parlamentarnem pregledu sporazuma;
ways to phase into a medium-term solution empowering an EU judicial authority to oversee the extraction in the EU, on behalf of Member States, after a mid-term parliamentary review of the agreement;
načine, da se medtem zagotovi, da se izbrano osebje EU (iz organov in institucij EU, vključno z denimo evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov ali skupnimi preiskovalnimi skupinami EU-ZDA), ki ima visoko raven dostopa do zaupnih podatkov, pridruži uradnikom organizacije SWIFT pri nadzorovanju postopka pridobivanja podatkov v ZDA;
ways to ensure, in the meantime, that EU select personnel – from EU organs or bodies, including for example, the EDPS, or joint EU-US investigation teams – with high clearance, joins SWIFT officials in the oversight of the extraction process in the US;
poudarja dejstvo, da mora biti vsakršna pogodba med EU in ZDA, ne glede na izbrani izvedbeni mehanizem, časovno omejena in zagotavljati jasno obvezo Sveta in Komisije, da bosta sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe, s katerimi bi poiskali trajno in zakonito evropsko rešitev za vprašanje zajemanja zahtevanih podatkov na evropskem ozemlju; sporazum mora Komisiji omogočati tudi, da v določenih trenutkih med izvajanjem opravi ocene in varnostne preglede;
Underlines the fact that any agreement between the EU and the US, regardless of the implementing mechanism chosen, should be limited in its duration and provide for a clear commitment on the part of both the Council and Commission to take all the measures required to devise a durable, legally sound European solution to the issue of the extraction of requested data on European soil; the agreement should also provide for evaluations and safeguard reviews by the Commission at set times during its implementation;
zahteva, da se sporazum ob neizpolnjevanju katere koli obveze nemudoma prekine;
Calls for the agreement to be terminated immediately if any obligation is not met;
poudarja, da bi po načelih dejanske vzajemnosti oblasti ZDA morale dovoliti organom EU in pristojnim organom iz držav članic, da pridobijo in uporabijo podatke o finančnih transakcijah in sorodne podatke, shranjene na strežnikih v ZDA, pod enakimi pogoji, kot veljajo za oblasti ZDA;
Points out that true reciprocity would require the US authorities to allow both the EU authorities and competent authorities in the Member States to obtain and use financial payment messaging and related data stored in servers in the US on the same terms as apply to the US authorities;
zahteva, da so vse ustrezne informacije in dokumentacija, tudi osnovna spoznanja obveščevalnih služb, na voljo za posvete v Evropskem parlamentu, v skladu z veljavnimi predpisi o zaupnosti, da se dokaže potreba po ureditvi v primerjavi z že obstoječimi instrumenti; prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj ga redno obvešča o načinu izvajanja sporazuma in ga docela seznani z vsakršnim revizijskim mehanizmom, vzpostavljenim v okviru tega sporazuma;
Requests that all relevant information and documents, including the underlying intelligence, must be made available for deliberations in the European Parliament, in line with the applicable rules on confidentiality, in order to demonstrate the necessity of the scheme in relation to already existing instruments; asks the Commission, further, to report regularly on the functioning of the agreement and to inform Parliament fully about any review mechanism to be set up under the said agreement;
zahteva popolne in podrobne informacije o posebnih pravicah evropskih in ameriških državljanov (npr. dostop, izboljšava, izbris, nadomestilo in pravna sredstva) ter o tem, ali bo predvideni sporazum zagotavljal varstvo pravic brez diskriminacije, ne glede na državljanstvo osebe, katere podatki so v obdelavi v skladu s tem sporazumom, in poziva Komisijo, naj mu posreduje pregled ustreznih pravic;
Asks to be provided with full and detailed information on the specific rights of European and US citizens (e.g. access, rectification, deletion, compensation and redress) and as to whether the envisaged agreement is to safeguard ‘rights’ on a non-discriminatory basis, regardless of the nationality of any person whose data are processed pursuant to it, and requests the Commission to submit an overview of the respective rights to Parliament;
izraža zaskrbljenost, da je komercialni položaj določenega ponudnika storitev na področju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ogrožen in bo tako ostal tudi v prihodnje, če bo še naprej deležen posebne obravnave;
Expresses concern that the commercial position of one specific financial messaging provider has been – and will continue to be – compromised if it continues to be singled out;
poudarja, da mora predvideni sporazum zagotoviti, da se osebni podatki, zajeti iz podatkovne baze programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, hranijo na podlagi strogo opredeljenega načela „nujnosti“ in ne za dlje, kot pa zahteva določena preiskava ali kazenski pregon, v okviru katerega se je opravil dostop do podatkov v skladu s programom za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti;
Emphasises that the envisaged agreement must ensure that personal data extracted from the TFTP database are kept on the basis of a strictly interpreted ‘necessity’ principle and for no longer than necessary for the specific investigation or prosecution for which they are accessed under the TFTP;
poudarja, da koncept nezajetih podatkov ni razumljiv sam po sebi, zato bi ga bilo treba pojasniti; zahteva, da se določi najdaljše obdobje hrambe, ki mora biti kolikor mogoče kratko, v nobenem primeru pa ne sme biti daljše od pet let;
Points out that the concept of non-extracted data is not self-evident and should thus be clarified; calls for a maximum storage period to be established, which should be as short as possible and in any case no longer than five years;