natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
26. poziva Komisijo, naj se pri javnih organih in operaterjih prepriča, ali Priročnik za uporabo pravil Evropske unije o državnih pomočeh, javnih naročilih in notranjem trgu pri storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena, zlasti storitvah splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti z dne 7. decembra 2010 učinkovito izpolnjuje svoj namen; poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi javnim organom in operaterjem zagotovi pripomoček za učenje, s pomočjo katerega bodo lahko pravilno izvajali ta pravila;
Calls on the Commission to ascertain from the public authorities and operators whether the ‘Guide to the application of the European Union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest’ of 7 December 2010 effectively fulfils its purpose; asks the Commission, should it prove necessary, to provide the public authorities and operators with a learning tool to guide them towards the proper application of these rules;
29. podpira ohranitev obstoječega odstopanja brez pragov za bolnišnice in socialne ustanove; pozdravlja napoved Komisije, da želi od obveznosti priglasitve izvzeti še več storitev splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo plačila nadomestil za vse storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena zadovoljevale bistvene socialne potrebe, kot so opredelile države članice, kot je skrb za starejše in invalide, skrb in socialno vključevanje ranljivih skupin, oskrba otrok in mladine, zdravstvena oskrba in dostop do trga dela so izvzeti iz zahteve za obvestilo;
Supports the retention of the existing exemption without thresholds for hospitals and social housing; welcomes the Commission’s assertion that it wishes to exempt further categories of SSGI from the requirement that aid to them be the subject of notification; calls on the Commission to ensure that compensation payments for all SGEI meeting essential social needs as defined by Member States, such as care of the elderly and of people with disabilities, the care and social inclusion of vulnerable groups, child and youth welfare, healthcare and access to the labour market are exempted from the requirement of notification;
Lokalne storitve
Local services
32. poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ustrezne pragove za pravilo de minimis za plačila nadomestil podjetij, ki jim je bilo zaupano opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, tako da bo mogoče te storitve obravnavati po poenostavljenem postopku ter z bistveno zmanjšanim upravnim bremenom za ponudnike storitev brez negativnih vplivov na enotni trg; predlaga kot možno podlago kombinacijo višine nadomestila in prihodka podjetja, katerega je lokalni organ pooblastil za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; nadalje meni, da bi bil morda prag za obdobje treh finančnih let bolj ustrezen za zagotovitev potrebne prožnosti;
Calls on the Commission to propose appropriate thresholds for the ‘de minimis’ rule for compensation payments to undertakings entrusted with the operation of SGEI, so that these services can be dealt with by a simplified procedure and the considerable administrative burden on service providers be significantly reduced without negative effects on the Single Market; suggests as a possible reference in this respect the combined indices of amount of compensation payment and level of turnover of the undertaking entrusted with the operation of the service by the local authority; considers furthermore that a threshold for a period of three financial years might be more appropriate in order to ensure the necessary flexibility;
Vidiki kakovosti in učinkovitosti
Quality and efficiency aspects
Vloga storitev splošnega pomena
Importance of services of general interest
Storitve splošnega pomena nimajo samo odločilne vloge za posameznika, ampak so zelo pomembne tudi za blaginjo celotne družbe.
Services of general interest are not only crucial to individuals but are also tremendously important to the well-being of society as a whole.
Raznolikost tovrstnih storitev je velika in v Evropski uniji nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi presojajo o tem, katere storitve sodijo med storitve splošnega pomena, in sicer katero storitev bi bilo treba zagotavljati v splošnem interesu.
Such services are highly diverse, and national, regional and local authorities within the EU have discretion in determining what constitutes a service of general interest, i.e. which services ought to be offered in the interests of the general public.
Vsem tem storitvam je skupno to, da gre za storitve, ki jih država ali državni organi obravnavajo kot posebej pomembne za vse državljane, vendar jih brez posredovanja države ni mogoče zagotavljati oziroma jih ni mogoče zagotavljati v zadostni meri.
However, all such services have this much in common: they are services regarded by the state or state authorities as particularly important to all members of the public but they cannot be provided, or cannot be provided adequately, without state intervention.
S poseganjem države bi morali zagotoviti, da bi imeli vsi državljani dostop do teh storitev oziroma da bi bile vsem državljanom na voljo po sprejemljivi ceni in bi bile zelo kakovostne.
The state intervenes to ensure that all members of the public have access to these services and/or that they are provided for all members of the public at an affordable price and a high level of quality.
Ponujene storitve bistveno prispevajo h gospodarski učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti ter spodbujajo socialno, ekonomsko in teritorialno kohezijo v EU.
The services provided make an important contribution to economic performance and competitiveness and promote social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU.
Z zagotavljanjem storitev splošnega pomena se spodbuja uspešno izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020 za rast, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja, izobraževanja in socialnega vključevanja.
Successful implementation of the Europe 2020 growth strategy, particularly in the areas of employment, education and training and social integration, is furthered by the provision of services of general interest.
Zlasti pomembne so storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti, ki imajo odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju temeljnih pravic in bistveno povečujejo enake možnosti.
Of particular significance are social services of general interest (SSGI), which have an important role in underpinning basic rights and make a major contribution to equality of opportunity.
Preoblikovanje pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
Reform of the state aid rules on services of general economic interest
Za nadomestila države ali državnih organov podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, v skladu s členom 106(2) PDEU veljajo pravila iz pogodb Evropske unije, zlasti pravila o konkurenci, če uporaba takih pravil pravno ali dejansko ne ovira izvajanja posebnih nalog.
Under Article 106(2) TFEU, compensatory payments made by the state or state authorities to undertakings entrusted with the operation of economic services of general interest are subject to the rules contained in the EU treaties, and specifically to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them.
Člen 14 PDEU pa določa, da Unija in države članice v mejah svojih pristojnosti na področju uporabe pogodb skrbijo za to, da službe splošnega gospodarskega pomena delujejo na podlagi načel in pogojev, zlasti ekonomskih in finančnih, ki jim omogočajo izpolnjevanje njihovih nalog.
Article 14 TFEU also stipulates that the Union and the Member States, each within their respective powers and within the scope of application of the Treaty, shall take care that such services operate on the basis of principles and conditions – particularly of an economic and financial nature – to enable them to fulfil their mission.
Zato bi morali pri preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči upoštevati oba člena in zagotoviti, da ta pravila ne bi preprečevala dodeljevanja ustreznih nadomestil podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Reform of the EU state aid rules must therefore take account of both these articles, and it must be ensured that the rules do not prevent undertakings entrusted with the operation of SGEI from being appropriately compensated.
V javnem posvetovanju iz leta 2010, ki ga je vodila Evropska komisija, pa se je glede veljavnega svežnja ukrepov izkazalo, da bi morali biti pravni instrumenti jasnejši, enostavnejši, sorazmernejši in učinkovitejši.
However, the public consultation undertaken by the Commission in 2010 on the package of measures currently in force showed that the legal instruments need to be even clearer and more straightforward, proportionate and effective.
V posvetovanju se je poleg tega pokazalo, da bi lahko poleg upravnih bremen tudi negotovost in nesporazumi, zlasti glede odločilnih konceptov pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, kot so akt o pooblastitvi, primeren donos, podjetja, gospodarske in negospodarske storitve ali pomen za notranji trg, prispevali k neizvajanju predpisov.
It also emerged from the consultation that, apart from the administrative burden, other factors possibly militating against application of the rules on state aid to SGEI have been uncertainties and misinterpretations, especially of key concepts in the rules, such as ‘act of entrustment’, ‘reasonable return’, ‘undertaking’, ‘economic and non-economic services’ and ‘internal market relevance’.
Temeljna težava je, da je financiranje in organizacija javnih storitev v EU odvisna od presoje v posameznih primerih in pravne razlage.
One basic problem is the fact that the financing and organisation of public services in the EU hinges on rulings in individual cases and on legal interpretations.
Brez jasnega pravnega okvira ne bo mogoče odpraviti negotovosti in nesporazumov.
In the absence of a clear legislative framework it is impossible to eliminate the uncertainties and misinterpretations.
Na podlagi tega, da člen 14 PDEU zagotavlja novo pravno podlago za horizontalni zakonodajni okvir, s katerim bi za javne storitve določili načela in pogoje, zlasti ekonomske in finančne, bo končno mogoče zagotoviti potrebno pravno varnost in jasnost.
Now that a new legal basis has been created, in the form of Article 14 TFEU, for a horizontal legislative framework determining the principles and conditions, particularly economic and financial conditions, on which public services operate, the necessary legal certainty and clarity can at last be provided.
Evropska komisija bi morala najkasneje do konca leta 2011 predložiti takšen horizontalni pravni okvir.
The Commission should therefore bring forward a proposal for such a horizontal legislative framework, as a matter of urgency, by the end of 2011.
Pri tem bi morali upoštevati, da je preoblikovanje pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena samo del tega nujno potrebnega okvira.
At the same time, it should be borne in mind that reform of the EU rules on state aid for SGEI is only part of this urgently necessary framework.
Upoštevati je treba namreč tudi to, da je za nekatere storitve nujna posebna sektorska zakonodaja.
Account must also be taken of the need for special sector-specific legislation for certain services.
Osrednje točke
Core considerations
3.1 Poenostavitev, jasnost in sorazmernost
3.1 Simplification, clarity and proportionality
Pozdraviti je treba cilje, ki jih namerava Komisija doseči s preoblikovanjem, in sicer zagotoviti večjo jasnost pri uporabi pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ter bolj raznolik in sorazmeren pristop k različnim vrstam teh storitev.
The aims of the reform proposed by the Commission – seeking to clarify application of the rules on aid for SGEI and to ensure specific and proportionate treatment for the different types of SGEI in accordance with their diversity – are to be welcomed.
K boljšemu izvajanju pravil bi lahko prispevali tudi tako, da bi uporabo pravil o pomoči tako poenostavili, da bi bila upravna bremena organov sorazmerna z učinkom ukrepa na konkurenco na notranjem trgu.
The concern to simplify application of the state aid rules, so that the administrative burden on the public authorities concerned is proportionate to the impact of a given measure on competition in the internal market, could also improve the way that the rules are implemented.
V zvezi s tem bi morali ustrezno glede na možnosti na pristojni upravni ravni oblikovati določbe o prepovedi in nadzoru državne pomoči podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, da bi zagotovili pravilno izvajanje predpisov in tako podjetjem omogočili v celoti izpolnjevati njihove posebne naloge.
In this regard, the rules on the prohibition and control of state aid to undertakings entrusted with the operation of public services should be framed in a manner appropriate to the capacities of the level of administration responsible, in order to ensure that they are applied correctly and, in particular, that the undertakings entrusted with operating public services can perform in full the tasks assigned to them.
Pragovi, pri katerih za državna nadomestila za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ni potrebna priglasitev, zmanjšujejo upravna bremena.
The existence of thresholds for exemption from the requirement to give notification of state compensatory payments for SGEI serves to lessen the administrative burden.
Da bi ta še bolj zmanjšali, bi morali na splošno zvišati veljavne pragove, ki urejajo uporabo odločbe SSGP.
To lessen it further, an overall raising of the current thresholds determining application of the SGEI Decision should therefore be considered.
K poenostavitvi bi lahko še dodatno prispevala uvedba pravila de minimis za državno pomoč podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena, pri katerih se zaradi njihovega lokalno omejenega področja delovanja pričakuje zanemarljiv učinek na poslovanje med državami članicami.
Another potential means of promoting simplification would be through the introduction of a ‘de minimis’ arrangement in respect of state aid to undertakings entrusted with the operation of SGEI where the locally limited scale of the activity makes the likely impact on trade between Member States negligible.
Vendar je treba pri tem zagotoviti, da se nadomestilo uporablja samo za opravljanje zadevnih storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
It must, however, be ensured here that the compensation is used solely for the operation of the SGEI in question.
Kot možno podlago za to bi lahko izbrali kombinacijo velikosti občine, višine nadomestila in prihodka podjetja, pooblaščenega za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
An approach based on the combined indices of size of municipality, amount of compensation payment and level of turnover of the undertaking entrusted with operating the service might be an appropriate choice.
3.2 Socialne storitve
3.2 Social services
Za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena na področju socialne varnosti, ki so zaradi svojevrstnosti krajevno omejene, bi morali za višino nadomestila upoštevati posebej visoke pragove, pri nedoseganju katerih ni pričakovati učinkov na poslovanje med državami članicami.
In the case of social services of general economic interest which, by their nature, are restricted to a given locality, special higher compensation thresholds should be considered, on the assumption that compensation not exceeding such levels will not adversely affect trade between Member States.
Razmisliti bi morali o razširitvi odstopanja od obveznosti za priglasitev na druge vrste storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena na področju socialne varnosti, na primer za ustanove za oskrbo starejših in invalidov ter zdravstveno oskrbo.
Consideration should be given to extending the general exemption from the requirement for notification of aid so as to cover other types of social service of general economic interest, such as care facilities for elderly people or people with disabilities, or healthcare provision.
Javne storitve morajo biti zelo kakovostne in dostopne vsem slojem prebivalstva.
Public services must be of a high quality and accessible to all sections of the population.
Poleg tega ne bi smeli samo varovati posebne vloge in narave storitev splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti, ampak ju v okviru sektorskih pravil tudi jasno opredeliti.
At the same time, the special remit and character of SSGI should not only be protected but should also be clearly defined under sector-specific rules.
Zaskrbljujoča je restriktivnost nekaterih držav članic, ki državno pomoč družbam za gradnjo socialnih stanovanj obravnavajo kot pomoč za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena na področju socialnega varstva samo, če se te storitve zagotavljajo izključno prikrajšanim državljanom in socialno šibkim skupinam, saj tako ozko razumevanje pojmov spodkopava prednostni cilj socialne raznolikosti.
The restrictive stance taken by certain Member States which, in relation to state aid for social housing associations, classify the services provided by such associations as SSGI only if they are reserved for socially disadvantaged persons or groups is a matter of concern, as such a limited interpretation is at odds with the higher goal of fostering an appropriate social mix.
Če naj storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena na področju socialne varnosti opravijo svojo nalogo, bi morale biti te storitve dostopne vsem državljanom ne glede na njihov dohodek ali premoženje.
In order for social services of general economic interest to perform their special function they must be open to all members of the public irrespective of income or resources.
3.3 Široko polje presoje nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov
3.3 The broad discretion enjoyed by national, regional and local authorities
Storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena morajo biti zelo kakovostne, poleg tega je treba spodbujati univerzalni dostop do njih.
SGEI must be of a high quality and universal access to them must be promoted.
Po Protokolu št. 26 k Lizbonski pogodbi imajo države članice primarno pristojnost, da zagotovijo, financirajo in organizirajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
Primary responsibility for commissioning, providing, financing and organising SGEI rests with the Member States – a principle enshrined in Protocol No 26 TFEU.
V pogodbah EU je posebej poudarjeno široko polje presoje nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov v EU pri storitvah splošnega gospodarskega pomena.
The EU treaties thus place particular emphasis on the broad discretion enjoyed by national, regional and local authorities within the Union in relation to SGEI.
Zato je pravila EU o državni pomoči mogoče preoblikovati samo ob doslednem spoštovanju načela subsidiarnosti.
The EU state aid rules can therefore be reformed only in strict adherence to the principle of subsidiarity.
Poleg tega je Evropska komisija v skladu z določbami PDEU o konkurenci pristojna samo za nadzor državne pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, merila za kakovost in učinkovitost pa je na evropski ravni mogoče določiti samo na podlagi člena 14 PDEU, pri čemer je treba upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti.
Furthermore, the Commission’s responsibility, under the TFEU competition rules, is confined to monitoring state aid for the provision of SGEI, and the only basis for setting European-level quality and efficiency criteria is Article 14 TFEU, with observance of the subsidiarity principle.
o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
on the Reform of EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
5. opozarja, da bi moral biti prevladujoči cilj reforme državljanom z učinkovito porabo sredstev zagotoviti visoko kakovostne storitve po dostopnih cenah, pri čemer se ne sme pozabiti nujnega trajnostnega in visoko kakovostnega zaposlovanja; je prepričan, da se lahko ta cilj doseže brez omejevanja priložnosti za rast in konkurenco tako, da se z državno pomočjo po potrebi financirajo navedene storitve, ne pa izvajalci;
Recalls that the reform’s overriding ambition should be to secure high-quality services, in a resource-efficient way and at affordable prices for citizens, but without losing sight of the need for sustainable and high-quality employment; is convinced that this ambition can be achieved, without limiting the opportunities for growth and competition, by state aid financing such services when appropriate, and not the providers;
8. priznava, da je treba v pravilih o državni pomoči jasneje razlikovati med gospodarskimi in negospodarskimi dejavnostmi, ter svari pred uvedbo usklajenega okvira ali opredelitve na ravni EU, saj bi s tem omejili avtonomnost lokalnih subjektov ter ovirali inovacije in nove poslovne modele, ki jih pogosto uvajajo mala in srednja podjetja.
Acknowledges the need for a clearer distinction between economic and non-economic activities under the state aid rules but warns against the introduction of an EU-harmonised framework or definition, as this would not only restrict the autonomy of local entities but would also hinder innovation and new business models, which are often introduced by SMEs.
o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
on the reform of EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
5. meni, da bi bilo treba sedanje pristojnosti Komisije, z odločanjem o vsakem primeru posebej, podpreti z jasnimi merili in cilji, ki jih bodo države članice lahko sprejele, ki bodo omejeni na notranji trg in bodo zmanjšali pogostost sporov;
Takes the view that the Commission’s current responsibilities, taking decisions on a case-by-case basis, should be underpinned by clear criteria and objectives that can be accepted by the Member States, are limited to the internal market and reduce the scope for litigation;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi pravila za izdajanje pooblastil; poziva, naj razpis za projekt skupaj s pogodbo o ciljih velja kot akt o pooblastitvi;
Calls on the Commission to simplify the rules for mandating; asks that a call for proposals accompanied by a target-based contract be deemed to constitute a mandate;
Burkhard Balz, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Alfredo Pallone, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen
Burkhard Balz, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Alfredo Pallone, Anni Podimata, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Ivo Strejček, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen
Sophie Auconie, Philippe De Backer, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ashley Fox, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Andreas Schwab, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis)
Sophie Auconie, Philippe De Backer, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ashley Fox, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Andreas Schwab, Theodoros Skylakakis
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1406/2002 o ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za pomorsko varnost
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1406/2002 establishing a European Maritime Safety Agency
Poročevalec: Knut Fleckenstein
Rapporteur: Knut Fleckenstein
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................53
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................55
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................67
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 70