natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja ustanovitev medresorskih skupin v Komisiji, kot sta skupini za vprašanja mestnih območij in celovitega pristopa; Komisijo poziva, naj razširi tovrsten prečen način dela ter Parlamentu in Odboru regij redno posreduje rezultate dela teh skupin;
Welcomes the establishment within the Commission of interdepartmental groups such as that on "urban policy" and that on "the integrated approach"; calls on the Commission to develop this cross-departmental approach further and to keep Parliament and the Committee of the Regions regularly informed of the outcome of the work of the groups in question;
se zavezuje, da bo preučil prilagoditev Poslovnika Parlamenta, z začasnimi delovnimi skupinami ali telesi, čimer bi omogočil navzkrižno obravnavanje vprašanj na področjih, za katera je pristojnih več parlamentarnih odborov, zlasti v okviru delovanja delovne skupine za parlamentarno reformo;
Undertakes to consider changes to its Rules of Procedure to make provision, by means of temporary working groups or other bodies, for cross-departmental work on topics involving several parliamentary committees, in particular in the context of the proceedings of the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform;
poziva Odbor regij, naj poglobi ukrepe za razvoj upravljanja v praksi s kvantitativnega, pa tudi kvalitativnega vidika;
Calls on the Committee of the Regions to step up its efforts to develop the practice of governance, in both quantitative and qualitative terms;
Orodja za spodbujanje učinkovitega upravljanja in partnerstva
Tools for promoting successful governance and partnership
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj podpirajo oblikovanje programov za usposabljanje na področju upravljanja in partnerstva, pri čemer bi sodelovale javne ter zasebne institucije na področju izobraževanja in usposabljanja, da bi se lahko soočili z velikimi izzivi Skupnosti;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to support the development of governance and partnership training measures, involving all public and private education and training organisations, with a view to addressing the major challenges facing the Community;
poziva države članice, naj primerno uporabijo prostorsko načrtovanje, da bi spodbujale uravnotežen regionalni razvoj;
Calls on the Member States to make proper use of spatial planning in order to assist in the facilitation of balanced regional development;
poziva izvoljene predstavnike in uslužbence državne, regionalne in lokalne javne uprave ter partnerje, ki sodelujejo pri upravljanju operativnih programov kohezijske politike v skladu s členom 11 Splošne uredbe o strukturnih skladih, naj porabijo finančna sredstva iz teh programov, da bo tehnična pomoč pridobila usposabljanje na področju upravljanja v zvezi s temi programi, zlasti projektnega vodenja; Komisijo pa poziva, naj od držav članic zahtevajo podrobno poročilo o porabi posebnih finančnih programov;
Calls on elected representatives and national, regional and local civil servants and partners involved in managing operational programmes in the context of cohesion policy in accordance with Article 11 of the General Regulation on Structural Funds, to use the financial resources available under these programmes for technical assistance to acquire training in the forms of governance associated with these programmes, in particular project management; also calls on the Commission to request Member States to give detailed accounts of the manner in which their specific financial programmes are used;
meni, da bi morale evropske mreže za izmenjavo dobrih praks razširiti delovanje na področju upravljanja in partnerstev, bolj poudariti politične in strateške izkušnje iz prejšnjih programskih ciklusov in zagotoviti javni dostop do izmenjave izkušenj v vseh jezikih EU ter s tem pomagati zagotavljati, da se bodo dobre prakse dejansko izvajale;
Takes the view that the European networks for exchanges of good practice should broaden their work in the area of governance and partnership, put more emphasis on political and strategic lessons learnt from previous programme cycles and should ensure public access to exchanges of experiences in all European Union languages and thus help to ensure that good practices are in fact implemented;
pozdravlja pobudo francoskega predsedstva Unije, da sproži postopek za oblikovanje referenčnega sistema za trajnostno in solidarno mesto, ter poziva, naj se v tem referenčnem sistemu upošteva razsežnost upravljanja in partnerstva;
Welcomes the launching by the French Presidency of the European Union of a project to draw up a set of benchmarks for urban sustainability and solidarity and calls for the governance and partnership dimension to be included in those benchmarks;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs is President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2006 v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ( 2008/2045(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 21 October 2008 on "Better lawmaking 2006" pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality ( 2008/2045(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2005: uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti – 13. letno poročilo UL C 187 E, 24.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better lawmaking 2005: application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality – 13th report OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji UL C 187 E, 24.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on better regulation in the European Union OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o strategiji za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja UL C 187 E, 24.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o pravnih in institucionalnih vidikih uporabe instrumentov "mehkega prava" UL C 187 E, 24.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on institutional and legal implications of the use of "soft law" instruments OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z naslovom "'Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2006" v skladu s členom 9 Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (štirinajsto poročilo)" ( KOM(2007)0286 ),
having regard to the Commission report entitled "Better lawmaking 2006" pursuant to Article 9 of the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality (14th report)" ( COM(2007)0286 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Drugi strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2008)0032 ),
having regard to the Commission communication entitled "Second strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union" ( COM(2008)0032 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom "Drugo poročilo o napredku strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2008)0033 ),
having regard to the Commission working document entitled "Second progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment" ( COM(2008)0033 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Takojšnji ukrepi za leto 2008 za zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji " ( KOM(2008)0141 ),
having regard to the Commission communication entitled "2008 Fast Track Actions to reduce administrative burdens in the European Union" ( COM(2008)0141 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom "Zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji – Poročilo o napredku 2007 in napovedi za leto 2008" ( KOM(2008)0035 ),
having regard to the Commission working document entitled "Reducing administrative burdens in the European Union – 2007 progress report and 2008 outlook" ( COM(2008)0035 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0355/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0355/2008 ),
ker mora biti zakonodajno okolje v Evropski uniji zasnovano na merilih jasnosti in učinkovitosti,
whereas the European Union's regulatory environment should be informed by criteria of clarity and effectiveness,
ker izboljšanje regulativnih postopkov lahko pomaga pri doseganju ciljev Evropske unije,
whereas improving regulatory procedures could help to achieve the objectives of the European Union,
ker sta načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti temeljni načeli primarne zakonodaje, ki ju je v primeru, da zakonodaja ni v izključni pristojnosti Skupnosti, treba brezpogojno upoštevati,
whereas the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality are key principles of primary law and, in areas where the Community does not have sole legislative power, must be respected at all costs,
ker je pravilna uporaba načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti temeljnega pomena za utrditev teže in učinkovitosti zakonodaje Skupnosti, kakor tudi za približanje odločitev državljanom in s tem za boljše sprejemanje Evropske unije s strani prebivalstva, in ker sta ti načeli nujno potrebni za uresničitev utemeljenosti in namena ukrepov Skupnosti, saj omogočata državam članicam izvajanje lastnih zakonodajnih pristojnosti, v duhu sodelovanja med različnimi ravnmi upravljanja, ter posledično krepita pravno varnost,
whereas the correct application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality makes a fundamental contribution to consolidating the authority and effectiveness of Community legislation and to ensuring that decisions are taken at a level closer to citizens, thereby ultimately securing greater public acceptance of the European Union, and whereas these principles are essential to legitimising the appropriateness and scope of Community action, inasmuch as they enable the Member States to exercise their own legislative powers in a spirit of collaboration between the various levels of government, thereby increasing legal certainty,
ker je sprejemanje zakonodaje Skupnosti sedaj odvisno od uporabe načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki zahtevata uvedbo postopkov usklajevanja med nacionalnimi zakonodajnimi, izvršnimi in sodnimi organi, za zagotovitev nujnosti in zakonitosti ukrepov Evropske unije,
whereas at present Community law-making is subject to the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, which require the establishment of procedures for coordination with the national legislative, executive and judicial authorities in order to guarantee that European Union action is both necessary and lawful,
ker Komisija poudarja vrsto pomembnih vidikov za izboljšanje zakonodaje Evropske unije, kot so ocena učinka, zmanjšanje upravnih stroškov in poenostavitev, izboljšanje ter posodobitev veljavnih predpisov,
whereas the Commission highlights a range of significant factors involved in improving European Union regulation, such as impact assessment, reducing administrative costs and simplifying, improving and updating existing regulations,
ker Komisija v zvezi s tem pripisuje velik pomen vzpostavitvi odprtega dialoga med socialnimi partnerji in nacionalnimi zakonodajalci,
whereas the Commission attaches importance in this respect to establishing an open dialogue with both sides of industry and with national legislators,
ker je Komisija v svojem delovnem dokumentu z naslovom "Prvo poročilo o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2006)0690 ) napovedala približno 50 pobud za kodifikacijo za leto 2006, vendar jih je bilo le 36 posredovanih Evropskemu parlamentu, in ker je, po drugi strani, napovedala 200 pobud za kodifikacijo za leto 2007, vendar jih je bilo zakonodajalcu posredovanih le 21,
whereas in its "First progress report on the strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2006)0690 ), the Commission announced approximately 50 codification initiatives for 2006, but only 36 were in fact forwarded to Parliament, and, while 200 codification initiatives were announced for 2007, only 21 were submitted to the legislator,
ker v svojem tekočem programu poenostavitve priloženemu zgoraj navedenem drugemu poročilu o napredku glede strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja Komisija meni, da sta si revizija ter prenova veljavnih predpisov na nekaterih področjih enakovredna (energetska učinkovitost stavb, civilno letalstvo itd.),
whereas, in its Simplification Rolling Programme annexed to its above-mentioned "Second progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment", the Commission treats the revision and the recasting of regulations current in various areas (energy efficiency of buildings, civil aviation, etc.) as being equivalent,
ker se je Komisija zavezala, da bo predstavila akcijski program, ki bi upravne obremenitve podjetij v Evropski uniji zmanjšal za 25 % do leta 2012, in ker je v ta namen predlagala vrsto takojšnjih ukrepov, ki zajemajo več zakonodajnih področij,
whereas the Commission has undertaken to submit an action programme intended to reduce the administrative burdens on companies in the European Union by 25% by 2012 and whereas, to that end, it has put forward a series of fast-track actions related to various legislative sectors,
podpira namen Komisije, da izboljša kakovost zakonodaje Skupnosti in zmanjša zakonodajno breme, vključno z odpravo nepotrebne zakonodaje, ki ovira rast in zavira inovativnost; poudarja, da je na številnih področjih potrebno še več prizadevanj, da se zagotovi, da bo zakonodaja o notranjem trgu prinesla največje možne gospodarske koristi;
Supports the Commission's objective of improving the quality of Community legislation and reducing the legislative burden, including abolishing legislation that is unnecessary, hampers growth and inhibits innovation; stresses that even greater efforts are required in a number of areas to ensure that the maximum economic benefit is derived from legislation relating to the internal market;
spodbuja zakonodajo, ki temelji na načelih, ter osredotočenost na kakovost in ne na količino; meni, da je razprava o boljši pravni ureditvi priložnost za razmislek o zakonodaji kot postopku, ki je namenjen doseganju jasno določenih ciljev politik z izboljšavo zakonodaje Skupnosti, da bo pripomogla k rasti in zaposlitvam, ter s tem, da obvezuje in vključuje vse zainteresirane strani v vse faze postopka, od priprave do izvajanja;
Promotes principles-based legislation and the focus on quality instead of quantity; sees the "better regulation" debate as a good opportunity to reflect on legislation as a process designed to achieve clearly defined policy goals by improving Community legislation so as to favour growth and jobs and by committing all stakeholders to, and involving them in, all phases of the process from preparation to enforcement;
poudarja pomen načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti pri prizadevanjih za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje, da bi tako odpravili nepotrebno upravno breme za države članice in druge vpletene, kot tudi zagotovili širše razumevanje ukrepov, ki se jih v skladu z obema načeloma ureja samo na ravni Skupnosti, pri državljanih EU;
Emphasises, in the context of the efforts to bring about better lawmaking, the importance of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality both in reducing unnecessary bureaucratic burdens on Member States and those affected by legislation and in securing broader acceptance among EU citizens for those measures which, in keeping with both principles, can only be taken at Community level;
pozdravlja izboljšavo postopkov posvetovanja med zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki jo je izvedla Komisija pri pripravi svojih zakonodajnih predlogov, in upošteva večinoma pozitivne odzive vprašanih, ki ocenjujejo delo Komisije pri spodbujanju k sodelovanju;
Welcomes the Commission's improved procedures for consulting interested parties when drawing up its legislative proposals, and notes the generally positive reaction of those consulted when evaluating the way in which the Commission encouraged their involvement;
obžaluje, da kljub izboljšavi svojih postopkov, Komisija še naprej pripravlja različne dokumente v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in boljšo pripravo zakonodaje, ki nimajo enakih seznamov strategij za poenostavitev, kar otežuje splošen pregled njene strategije; vztraja, da je treba preprečiti večanje števila teh dokumentov; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi enotni letni dokument; poudarja, da je treba podati politično oceno in spodbuditi dobro sodelovanje na ravni Evropske unije, zlasti prek prizadevanj Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Deplores the fact that, despite having improved its procedures, the Commission continues to draw up separate documents relating to simplification and "better lawmaking" that contain non-identical lists of simplification strategies, which makes it difficult to get a complete overview of the strategy; stresses that the proliferation of such documents must be avoided; calls on the Commission to draw up a single annual document; emphasises that political assessments and good cooperation must take place at European Union level, especially through efforts by Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
meni, da objektivne presoje vpliva predstavljajo pomembno orodje za ocenjevanju predlogov Komisije, zaradi česar se zavzema za zunanjo in neodvisno preverjanje izvajanja ocen učinka;
Believes that objective impact assessments are an important tool for assessing Commission proposals and calls, therefore, for external, independent scrutiny of the conduct of impact assessments;
meni, da so posvetovanja in ocene učinka bistvenega pomena za boljšo zakonodajo Skupnosti ter da ne bi smeli pomeniti dodatnega upravnega bremena niti ovir, ki Komisiji preprečujejo ukrepanje; nasprotno, pomagale naj bi vzpostaviti trden pravni okvir, ki prispeva k rasti v Evropski uniji;
Considers that consultations and impact assessments are essential to better drafted Community legislation and that they should neither increase bureaucracy nor present bureaucratic stumbling-blocks preventing the Commission from acting but should instead help to establish a sound legal framework that is conducive to growth in the European Union;
poudarja potrebo po analizah stroškov in koristi, ki odražajo strukturo regulativnih stroškov pri prenosu direktiv v nacionalno zakonodajo in spremembe regulativnega okvira, v katerem podjetja in posamezniki delujejo; vendar se zaveda, da take analize stroškov in koristi ne nadomeščajo politične razprave o razlogih za in proti določeni zakonodaji;
Stresses the need for cost-benefit analyses that reflect the regulatory cost structures when directives are transposed into national legislation and that change the regulatory framework within which companies and individuals operate; is aware, however, that such cost-benefit analyses are no substitute for the political debate about the pros and cons of particular legislation;
meni, da bi morala Parlament in Svet pri pripravi predlogov sprememb upoštevati oceno učinka Komisije in lastne ocene učinka, da bi se izboljšala kakovost priprave zakonodaje;
Is of the opinion that, when proposing their amendments, Parliament and the Council should take into account both the Commission's and their own impact assessments in order to improve the quality of the drafting of legislation;
nadalje meni, da morajo objektivne ocene učinka temeljiti tudi na pravočasnem in celovitem posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi; poziva Komisijo, naj v svoje ocene učinka vključi zadostno število scenarijev in možnosti strategij (med njimi možnost, da se ne stori ničesar, če je to potrebno) kot podlago za stroškovno učinkovite in trajnostne rešitve;
11 Takes the view, further, that objective impact assessments must be partly based on early and broad consultation of interested parties; calls on the Commission to incorporate in its impact assessments a comprehensive range of scenarios and policy options (including, where necessary, the "do nothing" option) as the basis for cost-effective and sustainable solutions;
upa, da bo vključitev napovedi upravnih stroškov v presoje vpliva pomagala pri izboljšanju njihove kakovosti;
Trusts that the inclusion of a forecast of administrative costs in the assessments will improve the quality of the latter;
poudarja pomen, ki ga ima politična ocena na ravni Evropske unije za predstavnike državljanov, kot je na primer Parlament, ali predstavnike lokalnih in socialnih skupnosti, kot sta na primer Odbor regij in Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor;
Stresses the importance of the political assessment carried out at European Union level by bodies representing citizens, such as Parliament, or bodies representing local and social bodies such as the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee respectively;
izraža zadržke glede spodbujanja samoregulacije in soregulacije, kar bi bilo mogoče razumeti kot nesprejemanje zakonov, ki bi koristilo le interesnim skupinam ter pomembnim akterjem v gospodarskem življenju; zato podpira sklep Komisije, da so pravila še vedno najlažji način za doseganje ciljev Evropske unije ter za zagotavljanje pravne varnosti podjetij in državljanov; poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem razvije bolj usklajen pristop;
Voices doubts as to the appropriateness of encouraging self-regulation and co-regulation, which could ultimately turn into a form of "legislative abstinence" that would favour only pressure groups and powerful players on the economic stage; for that reason, supports the Commission's conclusion that regulations continue to be the simplest way of achieving the European Union's objectives and providing both businesses and citizens with legal certainty; calls on the Commission to develop a more consistent approach in this connection;
poudarja, da bi morali nezakonodajni ukrepi spoštovati ravnotežje moči in vloge posameznih institucij; želi preudarno in usklajeno prispevati k takim ukrepom ter graditi na preteklih izkušnjah; poudarja potrebo po politični potrditvi takih inovativnih ukrepov;
Underlines that non-legislative measures should respect the balance of power and the respective roles of the institutions; wants to make a wise and coherent contribution to such measures, building on experience; stresses the need for political endorsement of such innovative measures;
meni, da je treba okrepiti formalni zakonodajni sistem Evropske unije v okviru določb iz Pogodb in se izogniti vsem bližnjicam, tudi nezavezujoči neformalni zakonodaji;
Believes that the European Union's formal regulatory system needs to be strengthened, in the terms set out in the Treaties, and that short cuts, even by means of informal legislation which has no binding force, should be avoided;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija sprejela ukrepe za odpravo zaostankov pri prevodu besedil, ki so v fazi kodificiranja, v nove uradne jezike Evropske unije; obžaluje, da je Komisija napovedala približno 50 pobud za kodifikacijo za leto 2006 in približno 200 za leto 2007, vendar jih je Evropskemu parlamentu predložila le 36 oziroma 21.
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken steps to put an end to the delay in the translation into the new official languages of the European Union of the texts being codified; deplores the fact that, despite approximately 50 codification initiatives having been announced for 2006 and approximately 200 for 2007, the Commission has forwarded only 36 and 21 proposals respectively to Parliament;