natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ali lahko visoka predstavnica pojasni, ali sta ona in/ali Komisija pristojni in, če sta, ali sta pripravljeni sprožiti preiskavo o tem, ali so evropska podjetja na področju IKT ter varnostna in telekomunikacijska podjetja in njihove podružnice, tj. tiste z zakonito registriranim sedežem v EU, s svojim poslovanjem in ravnanjem morda prispevali h kršitvam človekovih pravic, zlasti v Tuniziji, Egiptu, Siriji, Bahrajnu in Iranu, in ali bodo morda prispevali k tovrstnim kršitvam v prihodnosti?
Can the High Representative explain whether she and/or the Commission has the power, and if so, is willing, to start an inquiry into whether the business operations and conduct of European ICT, security and telecom companies and their subsidiaries, i.e. those with a legally registered office in the EU, might have contributed to human rights violations, in particular in Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Bahrain and Iran, or might do so in the future?
Ali se visoka predstavnica strinja, da je izvoz IKT ter drugih tehnologij in programske opreme z dvojno rabo v države in podjetja v državni lasti z represivnimi vladami prispeval h kršitvam človekovih pravic?
Does the High Representative agree that the export of ICT, as well as other technological dual-use items and software, to states and state-owned companies with repressive governments has become instrumental in the violation of human rights?
Ali se visoka predstavnica strinja, da je treba oblikovati celovitejši mehanizem EU za izvoz in licenciranje tehnologij z dvojno rabo ter ga vključiti v zakonodajo EU, da evropska podjetja in tehnologije ne bi prispevali h kršitvam človekovih pravic?
Does the High Representative agree that a more comprehensive EU export and licensing mechanism for dual-use technologies should be established, and laid down in EC law, in order to prevent European companies and technologies from becoming an accessory to and instrumental in human rights violations?
Če se visoka predstavnica s tem strinja, ali je pripravljena pozvati Komisijo in/ali Svet k sprejetju novih zakonodajnih pobud, vključno s „seznami“ potencialno škodljivih tehnologij, ki jih je treba redno pregledovati in posodabljati, ter k oblikovanju (globalnega) mehanizma zgodnjega opozarjanja, ki bo vključeval obveščanje o slabšanju stanja glede svobode izražanja, svobode tiska in internetne svobode ter o zlorabi evropske tehnologije IKT za kršenje univerzalnih človekovih pravic?
If so, is the High Representative willing to press for new legislative initiatives by the Commission and/or the Council, including continuously reviewed and updated ‘lists’ of potential harmful technologies, and a (global) early warning mechanism that includes the notification of the deterioration of freedom of expression, freedom of the press, Internet freedom and the misuse of European ICT technology in violating people's universal human rights?
Ali se visoka predstavnica strinja, da je treba evropska podjetja pozvati k izvajanju notranjih ukrepov in mehanizmov za zagotavljanje skladnosti z omejitvami EU v zvezi z izvozom tehnologij z dvojno rabo ter da se morajo ta podjetja soočiti s posledicami v primeru kršitev teh določb?
Does the High Representative agree that European companies should be required to implement internal measures and compliance mechanisms to comply with EU export restrictions on dual-use technologies, and should face the consequences in case of breach of those provisions?
Ali se visoka predstavnica strinja, da si morajo tako podjetja v EU kot evropska podjetja prizadevati za povečanje ozaveščenosti, v EU in zunaj nje, o dvoreznem meču, ki ga lahko prinašajo tehnologije, in o tem, kako se lahko končni uporabniki zavarujejo pred zlorabo, ter da je treba oblikovati kodeks ravnanja EU za podjetja na področju IKT in telekomunikacijska podjetja?
Does the High Representative agree that both the EU and European companies should make efforts to raise awareness, both inside and outside the EU, of the double-edged sword technologies can represent and of how end-users can protect themselves against misuse, including the drafting of an EU code of conduct for ICTs and telcos?
Odgovor visoke predstavnice in podpredsednice Catherine Ashton v imenu Komisije
Joint answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Ashton on behalf of the Commission
Pisna vprašanja : E-007865/11 , E-007997/11
Written questions : E-007865/11 , E-007997/11
Pogodbi EU visoki predstavnici ne podeljujeta nobenih splošnih pooblastil glede izvajanja preiskav o domnevnih kršitvah človekovih pravic zasebnih podjetij.
The EU Treaties do not confer any general power upon the High Representative to conduct enquiries into alleged human rights violations by private companies.
Vendar pa je varstvo človekovih pravic v pogodbah določeno kot cilj zunanjih ukrepov Unije.
However, the Treaties provide that the protection of human rights is an objective of Union external action.
Zato je visoka predstavnica zaskrbljena ob kakršnih koli trditvah, da je ravnanje podjetij iz EU lahko prispevalo h kršitvam človekovih pravic v tretjih državah.
In this light, the High Representative is naturally concerned by any allegations that the behaviour of EU companies may have contributed to human rights violations in third countries.
Informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije (IKT) imajo dvojno naravo same po sebi, saj imajo potencial za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic ali pa represivnim vladam omogočajo, da še bolj kršijo človekove pravice.
Information and communication technologies (ICT) have an inherently dual nature, in that they have the potential both to foster democracy and to promote human rights or to enable repressive governments to increase violations of human rights.
EU je že sprejela ukrepe, v skladu s katerimi bi se ob izdaji licenc tehnologij z dvojno rabo proučilo tudi vidike človekovih pravic, vključno s tehnologijami na področju telekomunikacij in „varnosti informacij“.
The EU has already taken steps to introduce human rights considerations into the licensing of dual-use technologies, including telecommunications and ‘information security’ technologies.
Uredba (ES) št. 428/2009 o vzpostavitvi režima Skupnosti za nadzor izvoza, prenosa, posredovanja in tranzita blaga z dvojno rabo določa, da se lahko dovoljenja za izvoz blaga z dvojno rabo zavrnejo iz različnih razlogov, vključno zaradi spoštovanja človekovih pravic.
Regulation 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items provides that authorisations for the export of dual use items may be refused on a variety of grounds, including for reasons of human rights considerations.
Komisija trenutno ocenjuje, kako bi lahko vprašanja človekovih pravic tesneje povezali s sistemom za nadzor izvoza blaga z dvojno rabo.
The Commission is currently assessing how human rights considerations could be integrated more strongly into the dual-use export control system.
Komisija je 30. junija 2011 sprejela zeleno knjigo o sistemu EU za nadzor izvoza blaga z dvojno rabo.
On 30 June 2011, the Commission adopted a Green Paper on the EU dual-use export control system.
Zelena knjiga začenja široko javno posvetovanje o delovanju sistema.
The Green Paper launches a broad public consultation concerning the functioning of the system.
Razdeljena je na tri dele: prvi del določa splošni okvir nadzora izvoza, drugi se ukvarja s specifičnimi vprašanji iz sedanje uredbe o blagu z dvojno rabo, tretji pa podrobneje opisuje srednje- do dolgoročno vizijo nadzora izvoza v EU.
The Green Paper is divided into three parts: the first setting out the overall context of export controls, the second dealing with specific issues under the current Dual-Use Regulation, and the third elaborating on a mid‑ to long-term vision of export controls in the EU.
Zainteresirane strani so pozvane, da predložijo odgovore na vsa vprašanja iz dokumenta.
Stakeholders are invited to provide responses on all of the issues set out in the document.
Svoje pripombe morajo poslati do 31. oktobra 2011.
The deadline for comments is 31 October 2011.
Visoka predstavnica ni pristojna za redne preglede in posodobitve seznamov potencialno škodljivih tehnologij, ker so predmet predloga Komisije.
The continuous review and updating of lists of potential harmful technologies is not within the remit of the High Representative as they are the subject of a Commission proposal.
Treba je omeniti, da se s temi seznami, ki se redno posodabljajo in prenašajo v zakonodajo EU, dejansko izvaja mednarodno dogovorjeni nadzor blaga z dvojno rabo.
It is worth mentioning that these lists actually implement internationally agreed dual-use controls which are regularly updated and implemented in EU legislation.
Morebitna vzpostavitev „mehanizma zgodnjega opozarjanja“ presega področje uporabe izvajanja uredbe o blagu z dvojno rabo in jo je treba obravnavati v širšem okviru.
The possible establishment of an ‘early warning mechanism’ goes beyond the scope of the implementation of the Dual-Use Regulation and should be dealt with in a wider framework.
Praviloma morajo evropska podjetja izpolnjevati določbe uredbe o blagu z dvojno rabo in vseh izvedbenih nacionalnih predpisov ter vzpostaviti ustrezne mehanizme za zagotavljanje skladnosti v ta namen.
It is in general incumbent upon European companies to comply with the provisions of the Dual-Use Regulation and any implementing national legislation, and to ensure that they have put in place appropriate compliance mechanisms to this end.
Poleg tega zlasti člen 20 Uredbe od podjetij zahteva, da za namen preverjanja skladnosti vzpostavijo evidence o svojih izvoznih poslih.
Moreover, Article 20 of the regulation, in particular, requires companies to establish records of their exports for the purpose of compliance.
Členu 24 Uredbe od držav članic zahteva, da v primeru kršitve določijo ustrezne in odvračilne kazni na nacionalni ravni.
Article 24 of the regulation requires the Member States to establish appropriate and dissuasive penalties at the national level in the event of breach.
EU odločno podpira vodilna načela ZN o podjetništvu in človekovih pravicah, ki jih je Svet ZN za človekove pravice podprl junija 2011.
The EU is a strong supporter of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights endorsed by the UN Human Rights Council in June 2011.
Visoka predstavnica pričakuje, da bodo ta načela izpolnjevala vsa evropska podjetja, in zlasti da: —
The High Representative expects all European companies to comply with these principles and in particular that business: —
ne bodo kršila človekovih pravic in bodo obravnavala vprašanja škodljivih vplivov na človekove pravice, v katera so vpletena,
avoid infringing on the human rights of others and should address adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved;
si bodo prizadevala za preprečevanje ali zmanjševanje škodljivih vplivov na človekove pravice, ki so neposredno povezani z njihovimi dejavnostmi, proizvodi ali storitvami, ki se izvajajo ali potekajo v okviru njihovih trgovinskih odnosov, tudi če k tem vplivom niso prispevala,
seek to prevent or mitigate adverse human rights impacts that are directly linked to their operations, products or services by their business relationships, even if they have not contributed to those impacts;
jih bodo, kadar ugotovijo, da so škodljivo vplivala na človekove pravice ali prispevala k škodljivim vplivom nanje, odpravila ali sodelovala pri njihovi odpravi.
Where business enterprises identify that they have caused or contributed to adverse impacts, they should provide for, or cooperate in, their remediation.
Komisija je tudi navedla, da bo do konca leta 2011 sprejela sporočilo o družbeni odgovornosti podjetij, ki bo podlaga za nadaljnje ukrepanje EU na področju podjetništva in človekovih pravic, vključno z učinkovitim izvajanjem vodilnih načel ZN.
The Commission has also stated that it will adopt a communication on Corporate Social Responsibility by the end of 2011, which will further advance the EU’s actions on business and human rights, including on an effective implementation of the UN Guiding Principles.
ESZD in Komisija bosta proučili možnost ustanovitve medsektorske skupine z ustreznimi službami, ki bi obravnavala izjemno zapletena vprašanja, povezana z zakonsko ureditvijo izvoza IKT ali pripravo kodeksa ravnanja industrije IKT v EU.
In the light of the extremely complex issues involved concerning either legal regulation of exports of ICT or the development of a code of conduct for the ICT industry in the EU, the possibility of establishing an inter-service group with the relevant services to study this issue will be explored by the EEAS and the Commission.
Poleg tega bo delovna skupina Sveta za človekove pravice (COHOM) pred koncem leta 2011 obravnavala vprašanji svobode izražanja in uporabe novih informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij.
Moreover, the Council Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM) will discuss the issue of the freedom of expression and the use of new information and communication technologies before the end of 2011.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-009391/2011
Question for written answer E-009391/2011
Lambert van Nistelrooij (PPE) in Alojz Peterle (PPE)
Lambert van Nistelrooij (PPE) and Alojz Peterle (PPE)
Zadeva: Prost dostop do rezultatov raziskav raka
Subject: Open access to cancer research results
Marca 2011 je v sklopu podpornih raziskav za projekt Eurocancercoms v sedmem okvirnem programu Evropsko združenje za raziskave raka (EACR) med svojimi člani, ki delajo v Evropi, izvedlo spletno anketo, da bi ugotovilo, kakšne so njihove izkušnje in odnos do vprašanj v zvezi z akademskimi objavami in prostim dostopom do njih.
In March 2011, as part of the background research to the FP7 Eurocancercoms project, the European Association for Cancer Research (EACR) conducted an online survey of its members working in Europe to discover their experiences of, and attitudes to, the issues surrounding academic publishing and open access.
Zanimivo je, da odzivi v anketi in v poročilu o njej kažejo na veliko naklonjenost načinom objave, ki omogočajo prost dostop.
Interestingly so, as according to this survey and the forthcoming report the responses show very positive attitudes to the open access publishing route.
Najbolj zanimiv je verjetno statistični podatek iz ankete EACR, da 88 % sodelujočih meni, da bi morale biti javno financirane raziskave na voljo v branje in uporabo brez ovir za dostop.
Perhaps the most challenging statistic from the EACR survey is that 88 % of respondents believe that publicly funded research should be made available to be read and used without access barriers.
Kljub tej očitni podpori prostemu dostopu je v praksi najpogosteje uporabljeni model še vedno tradicionalen, kar pomeni, da je prost dostop do akademskih objav omejen.
Despite this clear support for open access, in practice the model most used still is the traditional one, where open access to academic publishing is limited.
Vendar se glede na rezultate te raziskave zdi, da bo v prihodnosti več možnosti za prost dostop, saj to podpira večina raziskovalcev in znanstvenikov.
With the outcome of this research though, it seems that there would be more space in the future for open access because of the clear preference and support of most researchers and scientists.
Internet bi bil lahko tudi dober vir za uresničitev bolj prostega dostopa.
The Internet could also be a good source for realisation of more open access.
Na podlagi teh spoznanj bi radi Komisiji zastavili naslednja vprašanja: 1.
Against this background, we like to ask the Commission the following questions: 1.
Je Komisija seznanjena s tem poročilom, ki ga je nedavno objavilo Evropsko združenje za raziskave raka? 2.
Is the Commission familiar with this report recently published by the European Association for Cancer Research? 2.
Se Komisija zaveda dejstva, da večina raziskovalcev želi, da bi bili za objave akademskih informacij izbrani taki načini, ki omogočajo prost dostop do objav? 3.
Is the Commission aware of the fact that most researchers seem to prefer the open access route for the publication of academic information? 3.
Ali Komisija upošteva te informacije pri pripravi prihajajočega zakonodajnega predloga za Obzorje 2020? 4.
Is the Commission taking this information into account with regard to the upcoming legislative proposal on Horizon 2020? 4.
V kolikšni meri in na kakšen način si Komisija prizadeva za uresničitev prostega dostopa do objav akademskih informacij?
To what extent is the Commission actively working on making open access for the publication of academic information happen, and in what way?
Poročilo, ki ga je objavilo Evropsko združenje za raziskave raka, se nanaša na rezultate Eurocancercoms http://www.eurocancercoms.eu/ in SOAP http://project-soap.eu/ (študija objav s prostim dostopom), dveh pomembnih projektov, financiranih iz sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (FP7, 2007‑2013) v okviru delovnega programa za znanost v družbi (program Zmogljivosti).
The report published by the European Association for Cancer Research refers to the results of Eurocancercoms http://www.eurocancercoms.eu/ and SOAP http://project-soap.eu/ (Study of Open Access Publishing), which are two prominent projects funded by the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7, 2007-2013) in the context of the Work Programme Science in Society (Programme Capacities).
Praksa dodeljevanja brezplačnega dostopa preko interneta (prosti dostop) do rezultatov raziskav je način za izboljšanje izkoriščanja rezultatov raziskav in je še posebej primerna, ko so vključena javna sredstva.
The practice of granting free-of-charge access over the Internet (open access) to research outputs is a way of improving the exploitation of research results and is particularly appropriate when public funds are involved.
Komisija je dobro obveščena o mnenju evropskih raziskovalcev, zlasti tistih, ki so predstavljeni v zgoraj navedenih projektih.
The Commission is well informed of the opinion of European researchers and in particular those presented by the two abovementioned projects.
Poleg tega Komisija trenutno analizira približno 1200 odgovorov na javno spletno posvetovanje o znanstvenih informacijah v digitalni dobi http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/scientific_information/consultation_en.htm , ki je potekalo od julija do septembra 2011 in je najširšemu krogu zainteresiranih strani in strokovnjakov omogočilo, da izrazijo svoje poglede, zlasti o prostem dostopu.
Moreover, the Commission is currently analysing circa 1 200 answers to the online public consultation on scientific information in the digital age http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/scientific_information/consultation_en.htm that was open in July-September 2011, and which gave the possibility to the widest range of stakeholders and interested parties to express their views, in particular on open access.
Prosti dostop je politika, ki jo izvaja vse več univerz, raziskovalnih centrov in agencij za financiranje po vsem svetu, vključno s Komisijo.
Open access is a policy being adopted by a growing number of universities, research centres and funding agencies worldwide, including the Commission.
Leta 2008 je Komisija začela eksperimentirati s prostim dostopom in je vzpostavila pilotni projekt o prostem dostopu v 7. okvirnem programu, ki določa zahteve za prost dostop do znanstvenih publikacij, ki izhajajo iz projektov, financiranih v sedmih raziskovalnih področjih 7. okvirnega programa.
In 2008, the Commission started experimenting with open access and launched the Open Access Pilot in FP7, which sets the requirements for open access to scientific publications resulting from projects funded in seven research areas of FP7.
Vrednotenje delnih rezultatov te naloge je v teku.
An evaluation of the preliminary results of this exercise is under way.
Vzporedno potekajo dejavnosti v zvezi s predlogom Komisije o pravilih udeležbe in razširjanja okvirnega programa za raziskave in inovacije (2014–2020) – Horizont 2020 http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/index_en.cfm?pg=home , ki bo natančno opredelil specifične načine za izvajanje splošnega načela prostega dostopa do vseh znanstvenih publikacij, pripravljenih s sredstvi EU.
In parallel, work is under way on the proposal of the Commission for Rules for participation and dissemination of Horizon 2020 — the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) http://ec.europa.eu/research/horizon2020/index_en.cfm?pg=home , which will spell out the specific modalities to implement the general principle of open access to all scientific publications emanating from EU funding.
Prost dostop do rezultatov raziskav je pomemben vidik širšega območja kroženja znanja, za katerega se je Komisija zavezala, da ga bo raziskala v skladu s posebnimi izjavami iz vodilnih pobud EU Unija inovacij COM(2010)546, 06/10/2010 in digitalna agenda COM(2010)245, 26/8/2010 .
Open access to research results is an important aspect of the broader area of knowledge circulation, which the Commission is committed to exploring in line with specific statements made in the EU Flagship Initiatives Innovation Union COM(2010) 546, 6.10.2010. and Digital Agenda COM(2010) 245, 26.8.2010. .
Prost dostop je pomemben način za izmenjavo znanja znotraj in zunaj evropskega raziskovalnega prostora (ERA) in prispeva k ustvarjanju evropskega „enotnega trga“ za raziskave in inovacije, v katerem prosto krožijo raziskovalci, znanstvena spoznanja in tehnologija.
As an important way of sharing knowledge within and beyond the European Research Area (ERA), open access contributes to create a European ‘single market’ for research and innovation in which researchers, scientific knowledge and technology circulate freely.
Zaradi tega si Komisija že prizadeva in si bo še naprej prizadevala za razvoj politike na področju prostega dostopa v ERA.
For this reason, the Commission is already and will continue to push for policy development on open access in the ERA.
Komisija pripravlja novo sporočilo o dostopu in arhiviranju znanstvenih informacij v digitalni dobi, ki bo sprejeto leta 2012 na podlagi sporočila Komisije o znanstvenih informacijah v digitalni dobi COM(2007)56, 14/2/2007 iz leta 2007 in nadaljnjih sklepov Sveta http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/intm/97236.pdf .
Building on the 2007 Commission communication on scientific information in the digital age COM(2007) 56, 14.2.2007. and the following Council conclusions http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/intm/97236.pdf , the Commission is preparing a new communication on access to and preservation of scientific information in the digital age to be adopted in 2012.
V njem bo ocenjen razvoj dogodkov od leta 2007 in navedena bodo območja za nadaljnje ukrepe držav članic in Komisije.
It will take stock of developments since 2007 and indicate areas for further actions by Member States and the Commission.
Spremljalo ga bo priporočilo Svetu, ki bo vsebovalo posebne sklope ukrepov.
It will be accompanied by a recommendation to the Council that will suggest a specific set of actions.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-009999/2011
Question for written answer E-009999/2011
Pino Arlacchi (S&D) , Dimitar Stoyanov (NI) , Michail Tremopoulos (Verts/ALE) , Robert Rochefort (ALDE) , Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler (S&D) , Frieda Brepoels (Verts/ALE) , Boris Zala (S&D) , Liisa Jaakonsaari (S&D) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Mariya Nedelcheva (PPE) , Sabine Lösing (GUE/NGL) , Pavel Poc (S&D) , Roberto Gualtieri (S&D) , Kyriakos Mavronikolas (S&D) , Keith Taylor (Verts/ALE) , Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL) , Guido Milana (S&D) in Ana Gomes (S&D)
Pino Arlacchi (S&D) , Dimitar Stoyanov (NI) , Michail Tremopoulos (Verts/ALE) , Robert Rochefort (ALDE) , Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler (S&D) , Frieda Brepoels (Verts/ALE) , Boris Zala (S&D) , Liisa Jaakonsaari (S&D) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Mariya Nedelcheva (PPE) , Sabine Lösing (GUE/NGL) , Pavel Poc (S&D) , Roberto Gualtieri (S&D) , Kyriakos Mavronikolas (S&D) , Keith Taylor (Verts/ALE) , Nikolaos Chountis (GUE/NGL) , Guido Milana (S&D) and Ana Gomes (S&D)
Zadeva: Visoka predstavnica/podpredsednica - 53 milijonov USD vredna prodaja orožja ZDA Bahrajnu
Subject: VP/HR — USD 53 million sale of arms from the US to Bahrain