natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba z utemeljenim interesom in s sedežem ali prebivališčem v državi članici, ki ni država, iz katere je bil zahtevek predložen, lahko vloži ugovor pri državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, v roku, ki omogoča ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 1.
Any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than that from which the application was submitted, may lodge a statement of opposition to the Member State in which it is established within a time limit permitting an opposition in accordance with paragraph 1.
Vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba z utemeljenim interesom in s sedežem ali prebivališčem v državi članici, ki ni država, iz katere je bil zahtevek predložen, lahko vloži ugovor pri državi članici, v kateri ima sedež, v roku, ki omogoča ugovor v skladu z odstavkom 1.
Any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, established or resident in a Member State other than that from which the application was submitted, may lodge a notice of opposition to the Member State in which it is established within the time limit permitting an opposition pursuant to paragraph 1.
Če se pri Komisiji vloži ugovor, mu mora v dveh mesecih slediti utemeljitev ugovora.
If a notice of opposition is submitted to the Commission, it must be followed within two months by a reasoned statement of opposition.
Komisija preveri sprejemljivost ugovorov.
The Commission shall check the admissibility of statements of oppositions.
Kadar je ugovor sprejemljiv, Komisija povabi organ ali osebo, ki je ugovor vložila, in organ ali izvajalca, ki je vložil zahtevek, k ustreznim posvetovanjem za razumno obdobje, ki ne sme presegati treh mesecev.
Where statement of opposition is admissible, the Commission shall invite the authority or person that lodged the opposition and the authority or body that lodged the application to engage in appropriate consultations for a reasonable period that shall not exceed three months.
Kadar je utemeljen ugovor sprejemljiv, Komisija najpozneje v dveh mesecih povabi organ ali osebo, ki je ugovor vložila, in organ ali izvajalca, ki je vložil zahtevek, k ustreznim posvetovanjem za razumno obdobje, ki ne sme presegati treh mesecev.
Where a reasoned statement of opposition is admissible, the Commission shall within a period not exceeding two months invite the authority or person that lodged the opposition and the authority or body that lodged the application to engage in appropriate consultations for a reasonable period that shall not exceed three months.
Komisija lahko na zahtevo ene od udeleženih strani podaljša rok za posvetovanje za največ tri mesece, če meni, da bi podaljšanje roka prispevalo k sklenitvi dogovora, ali če je ena od udeleženih strani iz tretje države.
The Commission may, at the request of one of the parties involved extend the deadline for the consultations by a maximum of three months if the Commission deems that extending the deadline would contribute to reaching an agreement or if one of the parties involved is from a third country.
Člen 50 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1
Article 50 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Skupina z utemeljenim interesom lahko zaprosi za odobritev spremembe specifikacije proizvoda.
A group having a legitimate interest may apply for approval of an amendment to a product specification.
Skupina v smislu člena 3, ki ima utemeljen interes, lahko zaprosi za odobritev spremembe specifikacije proizvoda.
A group within the meaning of Article 3 that has a legitimate interest may apply for approval of an amendment to a product specification.
Člen 50 – odstavek 2 – pododstavek 1
Article 50 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1
Kadar sprememba vključuje eno ali več sprememb specifikacije, ki niso manjše, je treba v zahtevku za spremembo upoštevati postopek iz členov 46, 47, 48 in 49.
Where the amendment involves one or more amendments to the specification that are not minor, the amendment application shall follow the procedure laid down in Articles 46, 47, 48 and 49.
Preverjanje vloge se osredotoči izključno na predlagano spremembo.
The scrutiny of the application shall focus exclusively on the proposed amendment.
Člen 51 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Komisija lahko na lastno pobudo ali zahtevo katere koli fizične ali pravne osebe z utemeljenim interesom na podlagi izvedbenih aktov prekliče registracijo zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe ali zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti v naslednjih primerih:
The Commission may, on its own initiative or on request of any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, by means of implementing acts, cancel the registration of a protected designation of origin or of a protected geographical indication or of a traditional speciality guaranteed in the following cases:
Komisija lahko na zahtevo katere koli fizične ali pravne osebe z utemeljenim interesom po celoviti in nepristranski preiskavi, za katero je postopek določen v odstavku 2, na podlagi izvedbenih aktov prekliče registracijo zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe ali zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti v naslednjih primerih:
The Commission may, at the request of any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest, after a full and impartial inquiry of which the procedure is set out in paragraph 2, by means of implementing acts, cancel the registration of a protected designation of origin or of a protected geographical indication or of a traditional speciality guaranteed in the following cases:
Člen 51 – odstavek 1 – pododstavek 1 – točka (b)
Article 51 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b
(b) najmanj pet let ni bil na trg dan noben proizvod v okviru zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti, zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe.
(b) no product is placed on the market under the traditional speciality guaranteed, the protected designation of origin or the protected geographical indication for at least five years.
(b) najmanj deset let ni bil na trg dan noben proizvod v okviru zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti, zaščitene označbe porekla ali zaščitene geografske označbe.
(b) no product is placed on the market under the traditional speciality guaranteed, the protected designation of origin or the protected geographical indication for at least ten years.
Glede na dolgotrajen in natančen postopek, potreben za registracijo označb, je treba pogojem in postopkom za njihov preklic, vključno z obdobjem, v katerem ne smejo biti dane na trg, nameniti posebno pozornost.
Given the time-consuming and painstaking procedure required for the registering of a designation/indication, particular care must be taken regarding the conditions and procedures for cancellation thereof, including the period of time for which it may not be placed on the market.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov se prenese na Komisijo pod pogoji iz tega člena .
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article.
Prenos pooblastil iz odstavka 1 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet .
The delegation of powers referred to in paragraph 1 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Pooblastilo za sprejetje delegiranih aktov iz členov 2(1), 5(3), 7(3), 12(5), 13(3a), 16(2), 18(4), 19(2), 23(4), 25(3), 29(3), 29a, 39(2), 41(3), 46(1), 46(7), 48(6), 50(3), 51(2) se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje petih let od ...* .
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 2(1), 5(3), 7(3), 12(5), 13(3a), 16(2), 18(4), 19(2), 23(4), 25(3), 29(3), 29 a , 39(2), 41(3), 46(1), 46(7), 48(6), 50(3), 51(2) shall be conferred on the Commission for a period of five years from...*.
Komisija pripravi poročilo o prenosu pooblastila najpozneje devet mesecev pred koncem petletnega obdobja.
The Commission shall draw up a report in respect of the delegation of power no later than nine months before the end of the five-year period.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu prenosa pooblastil, obvesti drugega zakonodajalca in Komisijo vsaj en mesec pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri čemer navede prenesena pooblastila, ki bi se lahko preklicala, ter morebitne razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of powers shall inform the other legislator and the Commission, at least one month before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Z odločitvijo o preklicu prenehajo veljati pooblastila iz navedene odločitve.
The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the powers specified in that decision.
Odločitev začne veljati takoj ali na poznejši datum, ki je v njej določen.
It shall take effect immediately or at a later date specified therein.
Evropski parlament in Svet lahko nasprotujeta delegiranemu aktu v dveh mesecih od datuma uradnega obvestila.
The European Parliament and the Council may object to a delegated act within a period of two months from the date of notification.
Z odločitvijo o preklicu navedeno pooblastilo preneha veljati.
The decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of power specified in that decision.
Če do izteka navedenega obdobja niti Evropski parlament niti Svet delegiranemu aktu ne nasprotujeta, se akt objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na dan, ki je v njem določen.
If, on expiry of that period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act, it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force at the date stated therein.
Delegirani akt se lahko objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati pred iztekom tega obdobja, če Evropski parlament in Svet obvestita Komisijo o nameri, da delegiranemu aktu ne bosta nasprotovala.
The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections.
Če Evropski parlament ali Svet nasprotuje delegiranemu aktu, akt ne začne veljati.
If the European Parliament or the Council raises objections in respect of the delegated act, it shall not enter into force.
Institucija, ki je nasprotovala delegiranemu aktu, navede razloge za nasprotovanje.
The institution which has raised objections to the delegated act shall state the reasons therefore.
Delegirani akt, sprejet v skladu s to uredbo, začne veljati le, če mu Evropski parlament ali Svet v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila, ki sta ga prejela v zvezi s tem aktom, ne nasprotujeta ali če sta pred iztekom tega roka oba obvestila Komisijo, da mu ne bosta nasprotovala.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to this Regulation shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council, or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
* Datum začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
* Date of the entry into force of this Regulation
[Kadar so izvedbeni akti sprejeti v skladu s to uredbo, Komisiji pomaga Odbor za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov, pri čemer se uporablja postopek iz člena [5] Uredbe (EU) št. [xxxx/yyyy]
[Where implementing acts are adopted pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission shall be assisted by the Agricultural Product Quality Policy Committee and the procedure provided for in Article [5] of Regulation (EU) No [xxxx/yyyy] shall apply.]
Komisiji pomaga Odbor za politiko kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Agricultural Product Quality Committee.
Priloga I – del I – alinea 10 a (novo)
Annex I – part I – indent 10 a (new)
– rastlinska olja kmetijskega izvora za uporabo v kozmetiki,
– vegetable oils of agricultural origin for cosmetic purposes,
Priloga I – točka II – zadnja alinea (novo)
Annex I - point II - last dash (new)
Obstajajo tradicionalne, skoraj obrtniške metode za proizvodnjo soli.
There are traditional methods, almost artisanal, for the production of sea salt.
Te metode je treba priznati v okviru sheme ZTP.
These production methods need to be recognised under the TSG scheme.
Splošna predstavitev
General presentation
Evropsko kmetijstvo zagotavlja zelo raznoliko hrano, s proizvodnimi metodami, ki spoštujejo okolje in podeželske skupnosti.
European agriculture delivers food of great variety, with production methods that are respectful of the environment and of rural communities.
Kakovost evropske hrane je zaradi regionalne raznolikosti hrane, tradicionalnih metod proizvodnje, ki so včasih stare stoletja, poudarka na varnosti in dobrih okoljskih razmer med najvišjimi na svetu.
The regional diversity of food, the traditional methods of production sometimes going centuries back, the emphasis on safety and good environmental conditions lead to the fact that the quality of European food is among the highest in the world.
Tako kmete kot potrošnike je treba ozavestiti o posebnostih doma pridelane hrane.
Farmers and consumers alike need to be made aware of these special characteristics of their home grown food.
Poleg tega bi ta, v kakovost usmerjen pristop, lahko prispeval k nagrajevanju proizvodov najvišje kakovosti na domačem, pa tudi na mednarodnih trgih.
In addition, this quality oriented approach could help reward the best quality products on the domestic, as well as international markets.
EU je v okviru svoje politike kakovosti živil uvedla vrsto oznak in shem kakovosti, ki priznavajo visokokakovostne značilnosti proizvodov, pa tudi njihove regionalne posebnosti.
The EU introduced a series of labels and quality schemes under its Food Quality policy that provide recognition for the high value characteristics of the products and also for the regional specificities of the product.
Sedanje sheme kakovosti so: zaščitena označba porekla (ZOP), zaščitena geografska označba (ZGO), zajamčena tradicionalna posebnost (ZTP), ekološko pridelano in najbolj oddaljene regije, vsaka shema pa ima svoj logotip.
The current quality schemes are: Protected designation of origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), Traditional Specialty Guaranteed (TSG), Organic Farming and Outermost Regions, all with their respective logos.
Novi predlogi Komisije
Commission new proposals
Odbor Parlamenta za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja sedaj obravnava nov zakonodajni predlog Evropske komisije o kakovosti in tržnih standardih.
Parliament's Committee of agriculture and rural development currently works on a new legislative proposal of the European Commission on quality and on marketing standards.
Cilj svežnja kakovosti, ki ga je predstavila Komisija, je izboljšanje zakonodaje Unije na področju kakovosti ter delovanja nacionalnih in zasebnih shem certificiranja, da bi postale enostavnejše, preglednejše, razumljivejše, prilagodljive inovacijam ter manj obremenjujoče za proizvajalce in upravne organe.
The Quality Package presented by the Commission aims to improve the Union legislation in the field of quality, as well as in the operation of national and private certification schemes, in order to make them simpler, more transparent and easier to understand, adaptable to innovation, and less burdensome for producers and administrations.
Komisija je decembra lani po obširnem postopku javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je sprožila zelena knjiga o kakovosti leta 2009, predložila ta sklop zakonodajnih predlogov.
The Commission has presented this set of legislative proposals last December, following an extensive public consultation process launched by the publication of the Green Paper on quality in 2009.
Ta sveženj vključuje dva predloga uredb (enega o shemi kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in enega o tržnih standardih), pa tudi dva dokumenta s smernicami, enega o shemah certificiranja in enega o označevanju proizvodov s sestavinami ZOP-ZGO.
The package includes two proposals for regulations - one on agricultural product quality schemes and one on marketing standards - as well as two guideline documents, one on certification schemes and one on labelling of products using PDO-PGI ingredients.
Predlogi so obsežni in vključujejo številne točke, ki jih je zahteval Parlament v samoiniciativnem poročilu, ki ga je sestavil poslanec Giancarlo Scottà.
The proposals are extensive and include many of the points demanded by Parliament in our own initiative report drafted by Giancarlo Scottà MEP.
Poleg vsebinskih točk je treba opozoriti tudi na določbe o delegiranih in izvedbenih aktih, ki so zelo pomembni za to, kako se bo v praksi oblikovala politika v prihodnjih letih.
In addition to the points of substance, it is also important to note the provisions regarding delegated and implementing acts which bear an important significance for how policy making will be conducted in practice in the years to come.
Predlogi poročevalke
Rapporteur proposals
Poročevalka v splošnem meni, da bi med našimi prednostnimi nalogami morali biti poenostavitev in razvoj obstoječih shem, pa tudi dodajanje novih navedb kakovosti, ki bodo ustvarile vrednost za najboljše evropske proizvode.
Your rapporteur believes as a general remark that among our priorities should be the simplification and development of the current schemes, as well as the addition of new quality terms, that are likely to create value for the best European products.
Ker je predlog Komisije dobra in pohvalna začetna točka, poročevalka meni, da je mogoče doseči večjo jasnost in celovitejši evropski sistem kakovosti.
Whereas the Commission proposal constitutes a good and laudable departure point, your rapporteur believes greater clarity and a more comprehensive European quality system may be achieved.
Poročevalka se je pri pripravi osnutka poročila obsežno posvetovala s kolegi in poročevalci v senci, o zakonodajnem predlogu je dvakrat razpravljala v odboru ter je organizirala delavnico s strokovnjaki o tej politiki.
In preparing the draft report, the rapporteur has consulted extensively with colleagues and shadow rapporteurs, discussed the legislative proposals in the Committee on two separate occasions and hosted a workshop with experts on the policy.
Redno se je posvetovala s Komisijo in od nje zahtevala pojasnila; poleg tega se je poročevalka večkrat srečala s predstavniki panoge, zainteresiranimi stranmi ter z nacionalnimi in evropskimi institucijami, ki so v to vključene.
Further, regular consultations and clarification were asked from the Commission; also, the rapporteur held numerous meetings with the industry, stakeholders and national and European institutions involved.
Poročevalka je poskušala doseči večjo jasnost in poenostavitev besedila, kjer je bilo potrebno.
All throughout the text, your rapporteur has tried to achieve greater clarification and simplification, where this was needed.
Pomembna točka je bilo nudenje jasnejših opredelitev, da bi bilo besedilo razumljivejše tako za proizvajalce kot za potrošnike.
One important point in this sense was the provision of clearer definitions that render the text more comprehensive for both producers and consumers.
Ponekod je bila potrebna tudi večja pravna varnost.
Also, in some cases, greater legal certainty was needed.
V nadaljevanju poročevalka predstavlja spremembe, predlagane v vsakem naslovu uredbe.
In the following, your rapporteur presents the changes proposed to each title of the regulation.
· Sistem kakovosti zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti bi moral veljati tudi za nepredelane proizvode, saj obstajajo tradicionalne metode proizvodnje poljščin in živinorejskih proizvodov, ki niso omejene na posebno geografsko območje in katerih rezultat so proizvodi z značilnostmi, ki jim dajejo dodano vrednost, ali lastnosti, ki dodajajo vrednost zaradi tehnike kmetovanja in zato popolnoma ustrezajo cilju predloga iz točk a in b odstavka 2 člena 1.
· The quality system of traditional specialties guaranteed should also be applied to non-processed products, as there are traditional methods of crop and livestock production that are not limited to a specific geographic area and result in products with features that give added value or attributes that add value due to agricultural techniques and therefore fit perfectly the object of the proposal as outlined in Article 1, paragraph 2, points a and b.
· Poleg tega so ob upoštevanju opredelitve „predelave“ iz Uredbe (ES) št. 852/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2009 o higieni živil še vedno primeri, pri katerih ni jasno, ali je proizvod predelan, saj je treba oceniti, ali obdelava bistveno spremeni začetni proizvod.
· Moreover, taking into account the definition of "processing" that is set in Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs there are still cases in which it is not clear whether the product is processed or not, because we have to assess whether the treatment "significantly alters" or not the initial product.
S tem je povezana zahteva po vključitvi soli v področje veljavnosti sistema kakovosti zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti.
In this regard, requesting the inclusion of salt in the scope of quality system of traditional specialties guaranteed.
· Opredelitev „faz proizvodnje“.
· A definition for what is meant under 'production steps'
· Predlagamo vključitev opredelitve faz proizvodnje tudi v člen 3, saj to daje večjo jasnost, tudi ko govorimo denimo o fazah proizvodnje v členu 5(1)(b)(iii).;
· We propose to include the definition of 'production steps' also in Article 3, as this provides to greater clarity, also when we speak for example of 'production steps' in 5.1. b) (iii);
· V zvezi s členom 6 predlagamo alternativno besedilo, saj bi bilo treba vse vidike, ki so v sporazumu vezani na dodatno zaščito vin, razširiti tudi na živila, če je obdelava enaka za živila in vina (kar zadeva spoštovanje obveznosti EU, ki izvirajo iz sporazuma TRIPS, s strani Komisije), .
· In relation to Article 6, we propose an alternative wording because if treatment is identical to food products and wines in regard to the application by the Commission of the EU obligations arising from the TRIPS agreement, this should likewise be extended to food products, all aspects related to the additional protection afforded to wines in the agreement.
· Predlagamo, da se v točki b) odstavka 1 člena 7 ohrani „mikrobiološkimi ali organoleptičnimi“, kot je sedaj.
· In Article 7, paragraph 1, letter b), we suggest to maintain 'microobiological or organoleptic', as is the case at present;
· V zvezi z odstavkom 3 člena 12 poročevalka meni, da bi morali biti evropski simboli, ki so bili oblikovani in sprejeti za predstavljanje ZOP in ZGO, jasno navedeni na oznaki.
· In relation to Article 12, paragraph 3, your rapporteur believes the European symbols designed and adopted to represent the PDO and PGI should be clearly indicated on the label.
Po drugi strani poročevalka meni, da imajo lahko logotip EU in navedbe samo tisti proizvodi, ki se registrirajo po enakem postopku in pod enakimi pogoji kot proizvodi, ki izvirajo na enotnem trgu, ne pa prek dvostranskih sporazumov.
On the other hand, you rapporteur believes that only those products may carry the EU logo and the indications that go though the same registration procedure, on the same terms as products originating in the Single Market, rather than via bilateral agreements.
· Prizadevamo si za skladnost z drugimi spremembami, ki odpravljajo omejitev samo na predelana živila, poleg tega v primeru ZTP ta omejitev ni potrebna.
· Here, we seek to achieve consistency with the other amendments that depart from the limitation to processed foods only; also, we believe in the case of TSG, this limitation is not needed;