natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja hrabre madžarske može in ženske, ki so s svojim žrtvovanjem dali upanje drugim narodom pod komunistično vladavino;
Salutes the brave men and women of Hungary who, by their self-sacrifice, gave a beacon of hope to other nations under the stranglehold of Communist rule;
poudarja, da mora demokratična skupnost nedvoumno zavrniti represivno in nedemokratično komunistično ideologijo ter braniti načela svobode, demokracije, človekovih pravic in pravne države ter jasno obsoditi vse kršitve teh načel;
Underlines that the democratic community must unequivocally reject the repressive and undemocratic Communist ideology and uphold the principles of liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and take a clear stand whenever they are violated;
poziva demokratične države, naj jasno obsodijo zločine, ki jih zagrešijo totalitarni režimi;
Calls on all democratic countries to clearly condemn the crimes committed by all totalitarian regimes;
poziva k ustanovitvi evropskega programa za okrepitev sodelovanja med raziskovalnimi in dokumentacijskimi centri v državah članicah, ki preučujejo zločine totalitarnih režimov;
Calls for the establishment of a European programme to strengthen cooperation between research and documentation centres in Member States studying the crimes of totalitarian regimes;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
ob upoštevanju člena 103(2) svojega poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure
o 50. obletnici madžarske vstaje iz leta 1956 in njenem zgodovinskem pomenu za Evropo
on the 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Uprising and its historical significance for Europe
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta ob 50. obletnici madžarske vstaje iz leta 1956 in njenem zgodovinskem pomenu za Evropo
European Parliament resolution on the 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian uprising and its historical significance for Europe
ker je bila Evropa zaradi druge svetovne vojne razdeljena in je 50 let živela v razmerah hladne vojne, ki so je zaznamovala soočenja med velesilama Rusije in Združenih držav Amerike ter njunimi zavezniki,
whereas, as a result of the Second World War, Europe was divided and lived for 50 years under Cold War conditions marked by the confrontation between the superpowers – Russia and the United States – and their respective allies,
ker se je od 23. oktobra 1956 naprej zbiralo na sto tisoče ljudi v Budimpešti in drugih krajih Madžarske in zahtevalo svobodne volitve, izpustitev vseh političnih zapornikov, odpravo cenzure, odhod sovjetskih čet, višje plače in pokojnine, pošten davčni sistem ter program hitrejše državne gradnje stanovanj; globoko obžaluje, da te politične in socialne zahteve niso bile izpolnjene,
whereas from 23 October 1956 onwards, hundreds of thousands of people in Budapest and other places in Hungary rallied and demanded free elections, the release of all political prisoners, the abolition of censorship, the withdrawal of Soviet troops, higher wages and pensions, a fair system of taxation and a more rapid programme of house-building by the State; deeply deploring that these political and social demands were not met,
ker je vlada reformiranega komunista, predsednika vlade Imreja Nagyja stopila na stran protestnikov in sklenila, da se Madžarska loči od Varšavskega pakta ter razglasila madžarsko nevtralnost,
whereas the government of the reformist Communist Prime Minister Imre Nagy took sides with the protesters, decided that Hungary should withdraw from the Warsaw Pact and proclaimed Hungarian neutrality,
ker je madžarsko vstajo, tako kot leta 1953 v Nemški demokratični republiki in leta 1968 na Češkoslovaškem, nasilno zadušilo sovjetsko vojaško posredovanje,
whereas, as in 1953 in the GDR and in 1968 in Czechoslovakia, the Hungarian uprising was violently suppressed by Soviet military intervention,
globoko obžaluje dejstvo, da je bilo spodbudno prizadevanje madžarskega ljudstva leta 1956 za neodvisnost, demokracijo ter politične, gospodarske in socialne reforme, s silo zatrto; obsoja vojaško posredovanje Sovjetske zveze;
Deeply deplores the fact that the encouraging struggle of the Hungarian people in 1956 for independence, democracy and political, economic and social reforms was repressed by force; condemns the military intervention by the Soviet Union;
spominja se žrtev vstaje – padlih v boju, usmrčenih med letoma 1956 in 1961 ter priprtih in zaprtih med letoma 1956 in 1958;
Commemorates the victims of the uprising – people killed during the fighting and those executed between 1956 and 1961 or taken into custody and imprisoned between 1956 and 1958;
poudarja človeški in politični pogum Imreja Nagyja, reformiranega komunista, predsednika madžarske vlade, ki je pravilno razumel izraz volje ljudstva in sprejel vlogo političnega vodje v ljudski vstaji za svobodo in demokracijo ter je bil leta 1958 sramotno usmrčen;
Highlights the human and political courage of Imre Nagy, the reformist Communist Prime Minister of Hungary, who rightly understood the elementary expression of the will of the people, who agreed to be the political leader of the popular uprising for freedom and democracy and who was shamefully executed in 1958;
potrjuje svojo zavezanost vrednotam spoštovanja demokracije, socialnih pravic in pravičnosti, pravne države, spoštovanja človekovih pravic, nediskriminacije, strpnosti, solidarnosti ter enakosti med moškimi in ženskami; poudarja obvezo Evropske unije in držav članic, da ta načela v celoti podpirajo ter zavzamejo jasno stališče, kadar se katero koli izmed njih krši;
Reaffirms its commitment to the values of respect for democracy, social rights and justice, the rule of law, respect for human rights, non-discrimination, tolerance, solidarity and equality between women and men; underlines the obligation of the European Union and its Member States to uphold these principles in all their complexity and to take a clear stand whenever even one of them is violated;
poziva k ustanovitvi evropskega programa za okrepitev sodelovanja med raziskovalnimi in dokumentacijskimi centri v državah članicah preko zgodovinskih raziskav hladne vojne;
Calls for the establishment of a European programme to strengthen cooperation between research and documentation centres in Member States over historical research into the Cold War;
prav tako poziva vse evropske države, da storijo vse za končanje kakršnihkoli načrtov maščevanja in vojne, tako da omogočijo ponovno združitev Evrope v prihodnosti;
Calls also on all countries in Europe to do their utmost to put a definitive end to any thoughts of revenge and war so as to make the reunification of the whole of Europe possible in the future;
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0438/2006 Svetu in B6‑0439/2006 Komisiji
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0438/2006 to the Council and B6-0439/2006 to the Commission
ki ga vlagata Patrick Louis in Jens-Peter Bonde
by Patrick Louis and Jens-Peter Bonde
o posledicah sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. septembra 2005
on the action to be taken on the judgment of principle handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 September 2005
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o posledicah sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 13. septembra 2005
European Parliament resolution on the action to be taken on the judgment of principle handed down by the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 13 September 2005
ob upoštevanju naslovov IV Pogodbe ES in VI Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Title IV of the EC Treaty and Title VI of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 135 in 280 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 135 and 280 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 29, 30 in 31 Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Articles 29, 30 and 31 of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (veliki senat) v zadevi C-176/03 Komisija Evropskih skupnosti proti Svetu Evropske unije,
having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (Grand Chamber) in Case C-176/03 - Commission of the European Communities versus the Council of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju zaključkov generalnega pravobranilca Damasa Ruiz-Jaraba Colomerja o že imenovani zadevi C-176/03, ki jih je predstavil 26. maja 2005,
having regard to the conclusions of Advocate-General Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer presented on 26 May 2005 in said Case C-176/03,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo, ki je postala brezpredmetna 29. maja 2005,
having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, which became null and void on 29 May 2005,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 23. novembra 2005 o posledicah sodbe Sodišča v zadevi C-176/03,
having regard to the Communication of 23 November 2005 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the consequences of the judgment of the Court in Case C-176/03,
ker na področju kazenske zakonodaje ni nikakršne jasne dodelitve pristojnosti in ker je kazensko pravo izrednega pomena za suverenost držav članic, bi bilo nedopustno, da bi se ta pristojnost prikrito prenesla na Skupnost ob dodelitvi določenih materialnih pristojnosti,
whereas there has been no express conferral of powers in the field of criminal law, and whereas, given the considerable significance of criminal law for the sovereignty of Member States, there would be no grounds for accepting that these powers can have been implicitly transferred to the Community at the time when specific, substantive competences were conferred on it,
ker obrazložitev sodbe C-176/03, zlasti točka 47, navaja: "Načeloma kazenska zakonodaja ter predpisi o kazenskih postopkih niso v pristojnosti Skupnosti" in posebna točka 48, po kateri "ta trditev ne bi smela onemogočati zakonodajalcu Skupnosti [...], da sprejme ukrepe v zvezi s kazenskim pravom držav članic [...] za zagotavljanje popolne učinkovitosti predpisov, ki jih izdaja",
whereas the grounds for judgment C-176/03 state that 'as a general rule, neither criminal law nor the rules of criminal procedure fall within the Community's competence' (point 47) and (in the extraordinary point 48) that this finding 'does not prevent the Community legislator [...] from taking measures which relate to the criminal law of the Member States [...] in order to ensure that the rules which it lays down are fully effective',
ker člena 135 in 280 Pogodbe ES izrecno določata, da sta izvajanje kazenskega prava in upravljanje pravosodja v pristojnosti držav članic,
whereas Articles 135 and 280 of the EC Treaty expressly reserve to the Member States the application of national criminal law and the administration of justice,
ker pogodba o Evropski uniji posveča poseben naslov sodelovanju sodstva v kazenskih zadevah (člen 29 in naslednji Pogodbe EU), zlasti kar zadeva določanje elementov kaznivih dejanj in izvajanja sankcij,
whereas the Treaty on European Union devotes a specific title to judicial cooperation in criminal law matters (see Articles 29 et seq . ), in particular as regards the determination of the constituent elements of the relevant offences and penalties,
ker so sekundarni zakonodajni akti vedno upoštevali tradicionalno formulo, ki predvideva "učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne sankcije", ne da bi bila sporna svoboda držav članic pri izbiri upravnega ali kazenskega postopka,
whereas secondary legislation has always restated the traditional wording, by virtue of which 'effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions' are to be prescribed, without calling into question the freedom for the Member States to choose between proceeding under administrative or criminal law,
ker je posledica teleološke razlage, za katero se je zopet odločilo Sodišče, vključitev kazenskega prava v domeno Skupnosti na vseh področjih, ki jih pokriva njeno pravo, ne glede na prej omenjene določbe pogodb in nacionalne ustave držav članic, ob izvajanju katerih je kazensko pravo izglasovano v nacionalnih parlamentih; ker poročilo delegacije za Evropsko unijo nacionalne skupščine (št. 2829, januar 2006) poziva francosko vlado, naj upošteva posledice in spremeni francosko ustavo,
whereas the teleological approach which the Court of Justice has once again adopted will result in the Communitisation of criminal law in all the areas covered by Community law, disregarding the aforesaid provisions of the Treaties and of the national constitutions of the Member States, pursuant to which criminal law is enacted by the national parliaments; noting that in its report No 2829 of January 2006 the French National Assembly's Delegation for European Union Affairs even recommended that the French Government take appropriate action in response to this by revising the French Constitution,
ker je taka razlaga pogodb v očitnem nasprotju s stališčem, ki ga pred Sodiščem upravičeno zagovarjajo Svet in države članice; te edine lahko opozorijo na to, kaj je bil in je še vedno njihov skupni cilj, ko so se pogajale in podpisovale ter ratificirale že omenjene pogodbe Skupnosti,
whereas this interpretation of the Treaties is clearly at odds with the position rightly defended before the Court by the Council and Member States, who are the only parties qualified to state what was, and remains, their common intent when they negotiated, signed and ratified the said Community Treaties,
ker so nadnacionalne institucije, ki so bile ustanovljene s pogodbami, nastale z ustavnim nacionalnim privoljenjem, ki se ga lahko prekliče, so države članice in evropski narodi, ki so zastopani v Evropskem parlamentu, očitno žrtve hude zlorabe svojega privoljenja, če jim obvezujoče pravne sodbe vsilijo drugačno razlago pogodb od tiste, ki so jo podpisali,
whereas, whilst the supranational institutions created under the Treaties are the product of national and revocable constitutional consent, the Member States and the various peoples of Europe represented in the European Parliament would appear to be the victims of a serious misinterpretation of the consent they gave, since a binding legal decision is compelling them to interpret the Treaties in a manner different to that which they intended,
ker taka razlaga contra legem evropskih pogodb povzroča združitev stebrov v en sam institucionalni okvir, kar je predvidevala odločno zavrnjena evropska ustava, in predstavlja nasilen pravni poseg, brezobziren do načela o ločitvi oblasti,
whereas this contra legem interpretation of the European Treaties merges the pillars into a single institutional framework laid down in a European Constitution that has been overwhelmingly rejected, and represents a judicial hijack which shows no regard for the principle of the separation of powers,
ker pri izvajanju te zakonodaje na vseh področjih, ki predstavljajo "enega od bistvenih ciljev Skupnosti", zakonodajalec Skupnosti vsili predpise, ki imajo neposredne in prevladujoče posledice na naše nacionalne zakone, vključno z našimi ustavami, v imenu nepravične sodne oblasti, ki jo že od leta 1964 vztrajno izvaja Sodišče,
whereas, in application of this judgment, the Community legislator may, in all matters constituting 'one of the essential objectives of the Community', impose directly applicable rules which take precedence over our national laws, including our constitutions, by virtue of the consistently unjust jurisprudence which the Court has been handing down since 1964,
ker se, kot določa sodba z dne 13. septembra 2005 in vse uradne razlage, ki so sledile, vključitev kazenskega prava v domeno Skupnosti "zaradi zagotavljanja popolne učinkovitosti predpisov" lahko razširi vsepovsod – zagotovo na okoljsko politiko, vendar tudi na priseljensko, konkurenčno, zaposlovalno, socialno, prometno politiko itd. – in opraviči stalni prevzem nacionalnih pristojnosti v korist Evrope brez konca in kraja,
whereas, as shown by the ruling of 13 September 2005 itself and the official comments which followed it, it will be possible, in order to 'ensure that the rules laid down are fully effective', for the Communitisation of criminal law to extend indefinitely - not only to environmental policies, but also to immigration, competition, employment, social policy and transport, etc. - and to justify the continual absorption of national powers to the benefit of a bottomless, infinite Europe,
ker je v svojem sporočilu z dne 23. novembra 2005 Komisija predstavila začetni seznam devetih novih področij, na katerih namerava uveljavljati pravno prakso z dne 13. septembra 2005 in tako izničiti devet načrtov za okvirne sklepe, ki jih je izdelal Svet v okviru sodelovanja "pravo in notranje zadeve" z namenom, da se kazensko pravo, ki je v domeni Skupnosti, uveljavi na naslednjih področjih: pomoč pri vstopu, prehodu in bivanju nezakonitih priseljencev, onesnaževanje morja, goljufije s plačilnimi sredstvi, pranje denarja, kriminal na področju informatike, intelektualna lastnina, prekrški, vezani na evro,
whereas the Commission announced in its Communication of 23 November 2005 an initial list of nine new areas to which it intends to apply the judgment of 13 September 2005 by securing the annulment of nine draft framework decisions drawn up by the Council in the context of cooperation on justice and home affairs, in order to implement the Communitisation of criminal law in the following spheres: facilitation of unauthorised entry, transit and residence, marine pollution, counterfeiting of means of payment, money laundering, computer crime, intellectual property and offences relating to the euro,
ker tak obseg vključevanja prava v domeno Skupnosti presega ne samo okoljsko pravo, ampak tudi kazenskega, si sodniki v Luksemburgu neupravičeno lastijo pravo poslanstvo pravnega federalizma izven pogodb in v imenu istega "božjega" načela o prevladi, ki vodi evropske institucije, da se ne menijo za "ne",
whereas the scope of this Communitisation of law goes beyond the bounds not only of environmental law, but also of criminal law itself, with the judges in Luxembourg acting outside the Treaties and in the name of the same hegemonic principle of 'divine' order which led the European institutions to ignore the word 'no', as if on a veritable mission of judicial federalism,
ker je vzporedno s tem pravnim vključevanjem kazenskega prava v domeno Skupnosti Komisija že začela, brez kakršnega koli pooblastila ali osnove, ki bi izhajala iz pogodb, projekt "evropskega civilnega zakonika", ki ga pripravlja Von Barova skupina, financirana s 4.400.000 EUR v okviru programa Cordis; čeprav je zagotovo koristno postaviti referenčni okvir za lažje primerjanje nacionalnih zakonodaj (po vzoru "restatements" v Združenih državah), pa ta projekt poenotenja pripravlja izničenje različnih nacionalnih civilnih zakonodaj na zelo različnih področjih, kot so pogodbeno, družinsko, zavarovalno pravo, pravo o odgovornosti itd.,
whereas in parallel to this Communitisation of criminal law through jurisprudence, the Commission, without any mandate or any basis under the Treaties, had already begun work on a draft 'European Civil Code', which is being prepared by something called the 'Von Bar' group and is funded to the tune of EUR 4 400 000 under the Cordis programme; whereas, wherever it would doubtless make sense to establish an indicative reference framework to facilitate the comparison of national laws (along the lines of the 'restatements' used in the USA), preparations are instead being made under this unification project to do away with bodies of national civil law in areas as diverse as contracts, liability, the family, legal guarantees, etc.,
ker so naši državljani naveličani prav takšnih prevarantskih načinov in naddržave, ki se jo želi tako ustvariti in ki so jo v Franciji in na Nizozemskem že odločno zavrnili, in ker so z izvajanjem dunajske konvencije z dne 23. maja 1969 naredili Pogodbo o evropski ustavi za brezpredmetno, ob naklonjenosti državljanov, prikrajšanih za referendum,
whereas this insidious approach and the super-State it is attempting to bring forth is the very thing which our citizens no longer want and which France and the Netherlands have overwhelmingly condemned, under the benevolent eye of the peoples denied a referendum, thereby, pursuant to the Vienna Convention of 23 May 1969, rendering null and void the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
ugotavlja, da sodba Sodišča proti Svetu in državam članicam z dne 13. septembra 2005 v zadevi C-176/03 presega določila pogodb ter tako zadaja močan udarec privolitvi držav in suverenosti narodov;
Notes that the ruling handed down by the Court of Justice on 13 September 2005 in which it found against the Council and Member States in Case C-176/03 goes beyond the provisions of the Treaties and thus seriously undermines the principles of state consent and the sovereignty of peoples;
zahteva od Evropskega sveta predsednikov držav in vlad, da se sestane na izredni seji ter razpravlja in izda sklep, ki naj določi, da v primeru sporne razlage pogodb pravno in dejansko obvezno prevlada razlaga Sveta;
Calls on the European Council of heads of state and government to meet in extraordinary session to frame and adopt a decision stipulating that, in the event of conflicting interpretations of the Treaties, the Council's interpretation shall obligatorily take precedence in law and in fact;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje predsedstvu Evropskega sveta.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Presidency of the European Council.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o Bosni in Hercegovini
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on Bosnia and Herzegovina
ob upoštevanju sporazuma med konstitutivnima enotama Bosne in Hercegovine, sklenjenega oktobra lani, o sprejetju osnovnih načel, ki jih je v zvezi s prestrukturiranjem policijski sil začrtala Evropska komisija,
having regard to the agreement reached between the constituent entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina in October last year, to adopt the basic principles set out by the European Commission for the restructuring of police forces,
ob upoštevanju posledičnega sklepa Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2005, da z Bosno in Hercegovino začne pogajanja o stabilizacijskem in pridružitvenem sporazumu,
having regard to the Council's subsequent decision of 25 November 2005 to open negotiations with Bosnia and Herzegovina on a Stabilisation and Association Agreement,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma, doseženega 18. marca 2006 med voditelji glavnih političnih strank v Bosni in Hercegovini, o številnih predlogih ustavnih sprememb,
having regard to the agreement reached on 18 March 2006 between leaders of the main political parties in Bosnia and Herzegovina on a number of constitutional amendments,
ob upoštevanju sklepa usmerjevalnega odbora Sveta za uresničevanje miru, sprejetega junija lani, ki poziva urad visokega predstavnika, naj nemudoma začne priprave na zaprtje 30. junija 2007, in ki bo ponovno preučen in potrjen v začetku leta 2007, upoštevajoč celotne razmere v državi in regiji,
having regard to the Peace Implementation Council Steering Board's decision of last June inviting the Office of the High Representative (OHR) immediately to begin preparations to close on 30 June 2007 and to review and confirm in early 2007 the OHR closure, taking into account the overall situation in the country and in the region,
ob upoštevanju nedavnih predsedniških in parlamentarnih volitev v Bosni in Hercegovini,
having regard to the recent presidential and parliamentary elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina,
ob upoštevanju sklepov sveta za splošne zadeve o zahodnem Balkanu z dne 16. oktobra 2006,
having regard to the conclusions on the Western Balkans of the General Affairs Council of 16 and 17 October 2006,