natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob posebnem upoštevanju žrtev terorizma in njihovih mučnih izkušenj in ker je potrebno prednostno podpreti njihove pravice in ukrepe, s katerimi bi jim zagotovili zaščito in priznanje, ob zavedanju, da začnejo teroristi izgubljati, kadar njihove žrtve spregovorijo, družba pa jim prisluhne,
having very particular regard for the victims of terrorism and their agonising experience and for the need to give priority to upholding their rights and to measures seeking to afford them protection and recognition, ever bearing in mind that the terrorists begin to lose ground when their victims speak out and society gives them a hearing,
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi daljnosežnih posledic uporabe obsežnih baz podatkov o priseljevanju in azilu za namene boja proti terorizmu na ravni EU, zlasti pa zaradi omogočanja dostopa do baze podatkov Eurodac policiji in organom pregona držav članic ter Europolu v okviru njihovih nalog preprečevanja odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj, h kateremu pozivajo sklepi Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 12. in 13. junija 2007,
D concerned about the far-reaching consequences of using large-scale immigration and asylum databases at the EU level in the fight against terrorism and in particular about giving access to the Eurodac database to Member States' police and law enforcement authorities as well as Europol in the course of their duties in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences, as called for in the conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council of 12 and 13 June 2007,
se zato zaveda, da je boj proti terorizmu zelo večplastna zadeva in zdaj bolj kot kdajkoli prej zahteva večplastno in multidisciplinarno strategijo, kot na mednarodni ravni predvideva:
conscious, therefore, that the fight against terrorism is a very complex matter and requires, now more than ever, a multi-level and multi-disciplinary strategy as planned at international level:-
protiteroristična strategija ZN, sprejeta 8. septembra 2006 Glej http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.html
by the UN Counter-Terrorism Strategy adopted on 8 September 2006 See http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.html
, in Konvencija Sveta Evrope o preprečevanju terorizma, sprejeta 16. maja 2005 Glej http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=196&CM=2&DF=&CL=ENG (ratificirale so jo že BG, DK, RO, SL, SK).
and the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism concluded on 16 May 2005 See http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=196&CM=2&DF=&CL=ENG (already ratified by BG, DK, RO, SL, SK).
Evropski svet, ki je decembra 2005 sprejel strategijo za boj proti terorizmu Glej http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/05/st14/st14469-re04.en05.pdf
by the European Council when it adopted a Counter-Terrorism Strategy See http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/05/st14/st14469-re04.en05.pdf
, na žalost brez kakršnega koli sodelovanja Parlamenta ali nacionalnih parlamentov,
in December 2005, unfortunately without any substantial involvement by Parliament and by national parliaments,
Komisija, ki je predstavila svoj sveženj ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu 6. novembra 2007,
and by the Commission which presented its counter-terrorism package on 6 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju, da vsak vidik strategije EU – preprečevanje, zaščita, pregon, odzivanje – zahteva celovito udeležbo Parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, ki bi jih bilo treba celovito in redno obveščati na podlagi ocen, ki jih Komisija opravi vsaki dve leti, ter jim omogočiti, da bodo lahko preverili, kakšen je bil dejanski učinek sprejetih ukrepov, vključno z vplivom na temeljne pravice, ali so bili uresničeni izhodiščni cilji in kakšni so bili dejanski stroški pobud,
F considering that each one of the aspects of the EU strategy – prevention, protection, pursuit, response – requires the full involvement of Parliament and of national parliaments, which should be fully and regularly informed through evaluations carried out by the Commission every two years and enabled to verify the real effectiveness of the measures taken, including the impact on fundamental rights, whether the initial objectives have been implemented and the actual cost of the initiatives,
obžaluje, da prihaja do znatnega pomanjkanja preglednosti, demokratičnega nadzora, odgovornosti in pravnih sredstev, ter ugotavlja, da institucije EU in agencije, kot sta Europol in Eurojust, šele začenjajo bolj strukturirano zbirati informacije, potrebne za svoje dejavnosti,
regretting that there is a substantial lack of transparency, democratic oversight, accountability and judicial review, and noting that the EU institutions and agencies such as Europol and Eurojust are just starting to collect the information required for their activities in a more structured way,
izraža osuplost, ker nekatere vlade držav članic in Svet niso hoteli odgovoriti na obtožbe o zlorabi pristojnosti pod pretvezo boja proti terorizmu, zlasti v primeru izrednih izročitev in tajnih lokacij CIE,
dismayed at the refusal of some governments of the Member States and the Council to answer to allegations of abuse of powers under the pretext of counter-terrorism, in particular in the case of CIA extraordinary renditions and 'black sites',
je zaskrbljen, ker so bile pri osebah, osumljenih terorizma, uporabljene skrajne metode zasliševanja,
concerned that extreme interrogation techniques have been applied on terror suspects,
poudarja, da je treba v strategiji EU za boj proti terorizmu nameniti bistveno večjo pozornost vzrokom terorizma in vlogi Unije pri tem,
emphasising the need to pay considerably more attention in the EU counter-terrorism strategy to the causes of terrorism and the EU's role therein,
opozarja, da bi Lizbonska pogodba omogočila določitev preglednega, enostavnejšega in odgovornejšega okvira za vlogo Unije v boju proti terorizmu, krepitev solidarnosti držav članic ter vključitev Parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v ocenjevanje politik, povezanih z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, in hkrati obžaluje, da pri teh politikah na ravni EU ne bo celovitega sodnega nadzora nad zakonodajo, sprejeto pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe,
recalling that the Treaty of Lisbon should also make it possible to frame in a transparent, simpler and accountable way the Union's role in the fight against terrorism, to strengthen solidarity between the Member States and to associate Parliament and national parliaments in the evaluation of AFSJ-related policies, while regretting that for these policies there will be no full judicial control at EU level for legislation adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon,
toplo pozdravlja podpis Lizbonske pogodbe in poziva države članice, naj jo ratificirajo, da bo postala Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah zavezujoča, kar je nujna dopolnitev strategije EU za boj proti terorizmu;
Warmly welcomes the signing of the Treaty of Lisbon, and calls on the Member States to ratify it so as to make the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union binding, which is a necessary complement to the EU strategy for combating terrorism;
meni, da bi morala EU podpirati dejavnosti, katerih cilj je preprečevati nasilno radikalizacijo, na ravni EU ter na nacionalni in lokalni ravni, s pospeševanjem integracije ljudi prek medkulturnega dialoga ter spodbujanjem demokracije in človekovih pravic kot univerzalnih vrednot, na katerih temelji naša družba, s čimer bi se izognili socialnemu izključevanju; meni tudi, da se je potrebno boriti proti nasilni radikalizaciji, tudi proti spodbujanju k nasilnim dejanjem;
Considers that the EU should support actions at EU, national and local level aimed at preventing violent radicalisation, by fostering the integration of people through intercultural dialogue and the promotion of democracy and human rights as the universal values underpinning our society, avoiding social exclusion; also considers it necessary to combat violent radicalisation, including incitement to commit violent acts;
poziva, naj se na vseevropski ravni končno prepove vsakršno opravičevanje terorizma;
Demands that there be, at long last, a Europe-wide ban on any apology for terrorism;
meni tudi, da je pomemben element pri preprečevanju terorizma politika razvojne pomoči EU in držav članic, ki deluje tudi kot varnostna politika; meni, da sta spodbujanje civilne družbe in pomoč pri doseganju socialnega miru in blaginje primerna načina, kako ljudem predstaviti možnosti, ki jih imajo na voljo, ter omejiti širjenje skrajnih ideologij, zato meni, da je treba v državah, iz katerih po ugotovitvah izvira teroristična dejavnost, v okviru razvojne pomoči veliko večjo prednost kot doslej nameniti razvoju izobraževalnega in zdravstvenega sistema ter sistema socialne varnosti;
Believes, further, that an important element in preventing terrorism is an EU and Member State development aid policy that also functions as a security policy; considers that promoting civil society and helping to achieve social peace and prosperity are a suitable means of showing people their opportunities and restricting the spread of fundamentalist ideologies; believes, therefore, that the development of education, health and social security systems in countries often identified as the origin of terrorist activities should be made a much greater priority than before in development aid policy;
v zvezi s tem meni, da bi morala biti EU naklonjena najboljšim praksam in njihovemu širjenju v EU, ter ugotavlja, da bo Parlament v kratkem podal priporočila na tem področju, pri čemer bo upošteval prispevek Sveta in Komisije;
Deems, in this respect, that the EU should favour best practices and their dissemination within the EU, and notes that Parliament will shortly be making recommendations in this area, while taking of account the contributions of the Council and the Commission;
meni, da primeri, kot je nedavni, ko je vrhovno sodišče ZDA zavrnilo obravnavo pritožbe o mučenju Khalida Al-Masrija, lahko zlasti pri muslimanskih manjšinah v EU okrepijo vtis, da se s protiterorističnimi ukrepi ustvarjajo dvojna merila; zato poziva EU, naj bolj prepričljivo sodeluje pri prizadevanjih v podporo pravne države v mednarodnem kontekstu, zlasti tako, da brani svoje državljane v pravnih postopkih v tretjih državah, ki zadevajo nesorazmerno veliko državljanov muslimanskega porekla;
Believes that cases such as the US Supreme Court's dismissal of Khalid Al-Masri torture appeal tend to reinforce the impression, particularly among Muslim minorities in the EU, that anti-terror measures create double standards; calls, therefore, on the EU to engage more forcefully in the struggle to uphold the rule of law within the EU and in the international context, in particular by defending its own citizens in prosecutions in third countries in which citizens of Muslim descent are disproportionately concerned;
meni, da preprečevanje terorizma zahteva takšno zunanjo politiko EU, ki bo spodbujala demokracijo, načela pravne države in spoštovanje človekovih pravic v naši soseščini in drugje;
Considers that the prevention of terrorism requires an EU foreign policy that promotes democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights both in the EU's neighbourhood and beyond;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj na evropski in mednarodni ravni sprožita pobudo za namestitev guantanamskih zapornikov iz tretjih držav, ki se ne morejo vrniti v domovino, ker jim tam grozi preganjanje in mučenje;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to launch an initiative at the European and international levels for the resettlement of Guantánamo prisoners from third states who cannot be returned to their country of origin because they risk being persecuted or tortured;
ponovno poudarja pomen policije in pravosodnega sodelovanja na ravni EU, zlasti glede izmenjave podatkov in analiz, ter poziva države članice, naj ob usklajevanju in podpori Europola okrepijo medsebojno sodelovanje;
Reaffirms the importance of police and judicial cooperation at EU level, especially as far as exchanges of information and analysis are concerned, and calls on the Member States to reinforce their cooperation, with the coordination and support of Europol;
poziva, naj se okrepi vloga Europola, in poudarja, da mora biti Europol sam pristojen za preiskave v boju proti terorizmu; v zvezi s tem poziva tudi, naj se znotraj Europola ustanovi delovna skupina za boj proti terorizmu, v njej pa bodo delovali nacionalni strokovnjaki;
Demands that Europol's role be strengthened and reaffirms that, in the fight against terrorism, Europol needs its own investigative powers; further demands in this connection that Europol set up its own task force and staff it with national experts;
meni, da bi morale Komisija in države članice za povečanje učinkovitosti EU v boju proti terorizmu vzpostaviti stalno omrežje za izmenjavo podatkov med protiterorističnimi centri EU;
Considers that, in order to increase the EU's effectiveness in the fight against terrorism, the Commission and the Member States should put in place a permanent network of information exchange between EU anti-terrorist centres;
Kar zadeva "zaščito"
As far as 'protection' is concerned:
meni, da je "za zaščito državljanov, temeljnih pravic, človekovih pravic, demokracije in infrastrukture ter zmanjšanje ranljivosti EU za napade, vključno z večjo varnostjo meja, prometa in kritične infrastrukture", bistvenega pomena, da EU:
Considers that, in order to protect citizens, fundamental rights, human rights, democracy, and infrastructure and to reduce the EU's vulnerability to attack, including through improved security of borders, transport and critical infrastructure, it is essential that the EU:
v sodelovanju z državami članicami na vseevropski ravni oblikuje:
establish, with the cooperation of the Member States, an EU-wide
sistem za opozarjanje na krize in njihovo odkrivanje, temelječ tudi na nacionalnih programih zaščite, ki naj za primere katastrof, ki so posledica naravnih nesreč ali človeške dejavnosti, deluje 24 ur na dan vse dni v tednu,
crisis-alert and -detection system, based also on national protection schemes operational seven days a week and round-the-clock for disasters caused by nature or human activity,
načrt kritične in strateške infrastrukture in omrežij, ob upoštevanju prihodnje direktive Sveta o ugotavljanju in določanju evropske ključne infrastrukture ter o oceni, koliko je potrebno izboljšati njeno varovanje,
map of critical and strategic infrastructures and networks, taking into account the future Council Directive on the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection,
učinkovit solidarnostni mehanizem med državami članicami, ki omogoči takojšnji dostop do redkih virov, s katerimi razpolaga država (tako imenovana posebna sredstva, kot so cepiva ali napredne tehnologije),
effective solidarity mechanism between Member States which can give immediate access to rare resources available at national level (so-called 'assets' such as vaccines or sophisticated technologies);
zagotovi, da postanejo baze podatkov SIS II in VIS v celoti operativne, vključno z določbami o dostopu organov pregona; opozarja, da te baze podatkov niso prvenstveno namenjene pregonu in da je zato dostop za namen pregona omejen na posamične primere, kadar je to v demokratični družbi potrebno in sorazmerno; meni, da množično zbiranje osebnih podatkov in njihova obdelava, da se s tehnikami podatkovnega rudarjenja ustvarijo profili, kot predvideva nedavni predlog direktive EU o podatkih o letalskih potnikih, na evropski ravni nista dovoljena;
render the SIS II and VIS databases fully operational, including provisions regarding the access of law enforcement authorities; points out that these databases have no primary law enforcement purpose and that access for law enforcement purposes has thus been limited to specific cases, when necessary and proportionate in a democratic society; considers that mass collection of personal data and data processing in order to create profiles through data-mining techniques, as envisaged in the recent proposal for a directive on an EU-PNR system, are not allowed at EU level
s pomočjo držav članic bolje uskladi delo svojih obveščevalnih služb, da zagotovi hitro odpravo obstoječih ovir pri izmenjavi podatkov, kot je na primer pomanjkanje zaupanja, saj so individualni "podatkovni otoki" in preprečevanje dostopa do podatkov s strani nacionalnih obveščevalnih služb v nasprotju s pristopom Skupnosti k boju proti terorizmu;
coordinate better, through the Member States, the work of its intelligence services to ensure that existing obstacles to the exchange of information, such as a lack of trust, are swiftly removed, as individual 'information islands' and the sealing off of information by national intelligence services run counter to the Community approach to fighting terrorism;
racionalizira in izboljša jasnost, preglednost in uporabnost zakonodaje za boj proti terorizmu;
rationalise and improve the clarity, transparency and applicability of its counter-terrorism legislation;
poudarja, da kakršno koli spremljanje interneta, ki ima za cilj preprečevanje terorističnih napadov, nikakor ne sme vključevati omejevanja svobodnega izražanja, katerega namen ni hujskanje k terorističnim dejanjem in ki samo po sebi gotovo ne more voditi k takim dejanjem;
Emphasises that any monitoring of the internet in order to prevent terrorist attacks should under no circumstances entail restrictions on free speech that is not intended to incite terrorist acts and cannot reasonably in itself lead to such acts;
opozarja Svet na njegove obljube Parlamentu in ga poziva, naj končno sprejme okvirni sklep o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, ter okvirni sklep o nekaterih postopkovnih pravicah v kazenskih postopkih na vsem območju EU, preden uvede druge ukrepe v zvezi z zatiranjem terorizma;
Reminds the Council of its promises to Parliament, and calls on it finally to adopt the framework decision on the protection of personal data processed within the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters providing for an adequate level of data protection, and the framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the EU before introducing any further measures relating to the fight against terrorism;
opozarja, da je glavni namen Eurodaca kot podatkovne baze prvega stebra olajšati uporabo uredbe Dublin II pri določanju države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, in da je malo verjetno, da bi bil kateri koli predlog o spremembi te uredbe v varnostni ukrep in orodje za preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj po pravu EU in mednarodnem pravu zakonit;
Recalls that the primary purpose of Eurodac as a first pillar database is to facilitate the application of the Dublin II Regulation to establish the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, and that any proposal to transform it into a security measure and criminal investigation tool would be unlikely to be legal under EU or international law;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bi dostop organov pregona in Europola do podatkovne baze Eurodac lahko vodil v stigmatizacijo, diskriminacijo in potencialno ogroženost iskalcev azila;
Notes with concern that access by law enforcement authorities and Europol to the Eurodac database could lead to stigmatisation of, discrimination against, and possible danger to, asylum seekers;
poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, naj v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti do junija 2008 organizira predstavitev predlaganih in sprejetih ukrepov v okviru boja proti terorizmu na ravni EU, o njihovem izvajanju in učinkovitosti;
Calls on its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs to organise, in cooperation with the national parliaments, a hearing before June 2008 on measures proposed and adopted at EU level in the fight against terrorism and on their application and effectiveness;
meni, da je vsaka oblika "profiliranja" v okviru protiterorističnih ukrepov nesprejemljiva; meni, da niso sprejemljiva prizadevanja za sistem podatkov o letalskih potnikih EU brez popolnega ovrednotenja sporazumov o podatkih o letalskih potnikih med EU in ZDA ter med EU in Kanado, zlasti njihovega vpliva na zmanjšanje nevarnosti in izboljšanje varnosti ter na zasebnost in državljanske svoboščine;
Considers that any form of 'profiling' in counter-terrorism measures is unacceptable; regards it as unacceptable to pursue an EU-PNR system without a complete evaluation of the EU-US and EU-Canada PNR agreements, in particular their impact on reducing the threat and increasing security as well as their impact on privacy and civil liberties;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker bi se z dostopom organov pregona in Europola do podatkovne baze Eurodac lahko zmanjšala učinkovitost, ki je bila osnovni namen podatkovne baze Eurodac;
Expresses concern that access by law enforcement authorities and Europol to the Eurodac database could diminish the effectiveness of the principal purpose of the Eurodac database;
Kar zadeva "pregon"
As far as 'pursuit' is concerned:
poziva države članice, naj ne oklevajo več in naj okrepijo pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje na ravni EU v boju proti terorizmu; zahteva, da bo nemudoma obveščen glede uspešnosti sedanjega sodelovanja ter o tem, kakšni so bili rezultati mehanizma medsebojnega ocenjevanja med državami članicami in institucijami EU;
Urges the Member States to cease to hesitate and enhance judicial and police cooperation at EU level in the fight against terrorism; asks to be informed without delay of the effectiveness of current cooperation and what results have emerged from the mutual evaluation mechanism between the Member States and the EU institutions;
poudarja, da je treba okrepiti usklajevanje in operacijsko vlogo Eurojusta in Europola, ki sta nepogrešljivi orodji dejanskega in uspešnega sodelovanja pri pregonu na ravni EU; obenem ponovno poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti popoln demokratični nadzor na ravni EU;
Emphasises the need to strengthen the coordination and operational role of Eurojust and Europol, that are essential tools for real and effective cooperation in prosecution and pursuit at EU level; at the same time reaffirming the need to ensure full democratic control at EU level;
ponovno odločno poudarja, da je treba sprejeti okvirni sklep o varstvu podatkov v tretjem stebru, ki bo državljanom EU zagotovil visoko raven varoval, ki je na ravni EU v tem trenutku primanjkuje;
Firmly reiterates the urgent need to adopt a framework decision on data protection in the third pillar, ensuring a high level of safeguards for EU citizens, which is now lacking at EU level;
zato poziva
Therefore asks,
Komisijo, naj Parlamentu pred koncem leta posreduje odgovore na njene vprašalnike o izvajanju protiteroristične zakonodaje na nacionalni ravni, zlasti o okvirnem sklepu o terorizmu in evropskem nalogu za prijetje, ter direktive o hrambi podatkov, njenem vplivu na temeljne pravice ter o katerih koli razlikah pri njenem izvajanju po državah članicah, skupaj z oceno in morebitnimi predlogi, kako zagotoviti boljše izvajanje in uporabo veljavne zakonodaje s področja boja proti terorizmu;
the Commission to refer to Parliament before the end of the year the answers obtained to its questionnaires on the implementation at national level of the counter-terrorism legislation, in particular the framework decision on terrorism and on the European arrest warrant, and the directive on data retention, and its impact on fundamental rights and on any differences in implementation in the Member States, along with an assessment and any proposals with regard to how a better implementation and use of existing legislation on the fight against terror can be ensured;