natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje, da v zeleni knjigi vprašanju spola ni namenjene dovolj pozornosti; meni, da je sedanja razlika med spoloma glede ustreznosti pokojnin posledica trajnih neenakosti na trgu dela, kot so obdobja brezposelnosti, bolezen, skrb za svojce, razlike med plačami moških in žensk, večja zastopanost žensk na negotovih delovnih mestih in delovnih mestih s skrajšanim delovnim časom ter ovire pri usklajevanju poklicnega in zasebnega življenja; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj nadaljujejo prizadevanja za odpravo teh neenakosti in zagotovitev dolgoročno enakega obravnavanja žensk in moških glede pokojnin, na primer z upoštevanjem porodniškega dopusta in oskrbe starejših družinskih članov kot dejanskega dela, s katerim bi moški in ženske pridobili pokojninske pravice;
Regrets that the Green Paper does not devote enough attention to gender issues; considers that the present adequacy gaps in pensions between men and women are the result of persistent inequalities in the labour market, such as periods of unemployment, sickness, care duties, the pay gap between men and women, the overrepresentation of women in precarious and part-time jobs and barriers to reconciling work and private life; therefore calls on the Commission and Member States to continue their efforts to eradicate these inequalities and ensure long-term equal treatment for women and men with respect to pensions, for example through the inclusion of maternity leave and care for elderly family members as actual work giving rise to an entitlement to retirement benefits for men and women;
poudarja pomen individualizacije pokojninskih pravic in poziva k določitvi meril, ki bi jih uporabili pri izračunu pokojnine žensk na tak način, da bo zagotovljena ekonomska neodvisnost tako moških kot žensk; poziva države članice, naj upoštevajo vseživljenjski pristop do pokojnin, zato da bi odgovorili na izzive cikla sodobnega delovnega življenja;
Stresses the importance of individualising pension entitlements and calls for criteria to be used in calculating women's pensions in such a way as to guarantee the economic independence of both men and women; urges Member States also to consider a life course approach to pensions, so as to provide answers to challenges of a modern working life cycle;
opozarja, da morata biti medgeneracijska pravičnost in interes mlajše generacije glavna vidika okrepljene metode usklajevanja za nadaljnji razvoj nacionalnih pokojninskih politik na podlagi sodelovanja med državami članicami;
Notes that inter-generational justice and the interests of the younger generation must be central aspects of a strengthened coordination method for the further development of national pension policies on the basis of cooperation between the Member States;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj izvajalce poklicnih in drugih dodatnih pokojnin prisilijo, da pri izračunu pokojninskih pravic uporabijo tabele umrljivosti, ki so nevtralne glede na spol, da ženske ne bi bile kaznovane za daljšo pričakovano življenjsko dobo;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to obligate occupational and other supplementary pension providers to use gender-neutral mortality tables when calculating pension benefits so as to prevent women from being punished for their higher life expectancy;
meni, da je nemogoče, da bi EU določila ustrezno raven pokojnin, ker je potrebni znesek zelo odvisen od posebnih okoliščin v državah članicah; kljub temu poziva Komisijo, naj izdela smernice, ki bodo državam članicam omogočale določitev meril za zagotavljanje minimalne ravni pokojnin; meni, da bi morale države članice opredeliti ustreznost kot pogoj, potreben za dostojno življenje starejših;
Does not consider it possible for the EU to set adequate pension levels, because the amount required is very dependent on specific circumstances in the Member States; calls however on the Commission to come up with guidance that makes it possible for Member States to establish criteria for a minimum level of pensions; considers that Member States should define adequacy as the condition required for older people to live a decent life;
meni, da so države članice same odgovorne za zagotovitev ustreznih pokojnin za svoje državljane v okviru svoje socialne in ekonomske politike; spodbuja države članice, naj vzpostavijo sistem, ki bo najustrezneje zagotavljal dostojen življenjski standard za vse, pri čemer je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti najranljivejšim skupinam v družbi;
Considers that Member States are themselves responsible for making adequate pension provisions for their citizens as part of their social and economic policies; encourages them to put in place a system which is the most appropriate for guaranteeing a decent standard of living for everybody, with particular attention to the most vulnerable groups in society;
poudarja, da je lahko v okviru različnih pokojninskih sistemov ustrezna pokojnina zagotovljena z diverzifikacijo pokojninskih prihodkov, in sicer s kombiniranjem javnega sistema (prvi steber) in sistema, povezanega z delom (v večini primerov drugi steber);
Stresses that, within the range of pension systems, diversification of pension income from a mix of public (first pillar) and work-related (in most cases second pillar) schemes, can provide a guarantee of adequate pension provision;
ugotavlja, da je v večini držav članic najpomembnejši prvi steber, ki temelji na načelu solidarnosti, ter da bi bilo njegovo financiranje manj obremenjeno, če bi bilo zaposlenih več ljudi in bi obravnavali nezakonito in neprijavljeno delo, obenem pa bi lahko države članice z odprto metodo usklajevanja medsebojno razpravljale o drugih možnostih financiranja tega stebra; poudarja, da so zakonsko določeni dokladni sistemi na preizkusu ob finančni in gospodarski krizi dokazali svojo stabilnost in zanesljivost; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da pokojnine iz prvega stebra presegajo prag revščine;
Notes that in most Member States the first pillar is the most important one and based on the solidarity principle and that the financing of the first pillar will be less under pressure if more people are at work and if illegal and undeclared work is addressed, while other alternative forms of financing the first pillar could also be discussed between the Member States in the Open Method of Coordination; stresses that statutory pay-as-you-go schemes have proved their stability and reliability in the test presented by the financial and economic crisis; calls on Member States to ensure that first-pillar pensions are above the poverty line;
poudarja, da na vzdržnost in ustreznost pokojninskih sistemov v nekaterih državah članicah vplivajo prihranki iz tretjega stebra; vseeno poudarja, da je ta možnost na voljo le osebam z ustreznim prihodkom, ki jim omogoča vlaganje v takšne sisteme, zato ima pri zagotavljanju dostojne pokojnine le omejeno vlogo;
Stresses that, regarding the sustainability and adequacy of pension systems, in some Member States third pillar savings provisions play a role; stresses, however, that this option is available only to persons who have an adequate income which would enable them to contribute to such systems and therefore can only play a limited role in providing a decent income;
meni, da bi bilo zelo uporabno, če bi države članice bolje izmenjavale informacije o stroških in učinkovitosti oblik davčnih olajšav za zasebna pokojninska zavarovanja;
Believes that better sharing of information between Member States on the costs and effectiveness of forms of tax relief on private pensions would be very useful;
meni, da je glede na proračunski pritisk učinkovitost socialnih izdatkov izredno pomembna; meni, da igrajo v okviru trenutnih proračunskih pritiskov socialni izdatki pomembno ekonomsko in socialno vlogo pri blažitvi učinkov krize; meni, da so dokladni sistemi dokazali svojo ključno vlogo na področju solidarnosti med generacijami; poleg tega meni, da imata pri zmanjševanju tega pritiska drugi in tretji steber dopolnilno vlogo; zato poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo najboljšo možno kombinacijo oblik pokojninskega zavarovanja, da bi zagotovile pokojnine v prihodnje; poziva države članice, naj izboljšajo dostop državljanov do zasebnih sistemov varčevanja; poudarja, da zaradi finančne krize več držav članic načrtuje spremembe pokojninskih sistemov; vseeno jih poziva, naj zagotovijo, da bodo vsi pokojninski sistemi ostali stabilni, zanesljivi in vzdržni, ter da spremembe uvedejo po ustreznem socialnem dialogu in na podlagi zagotovljenih zadostnih informacij; se zavzema, da je v primeru, če imajo zaposleni možnost odločanja, treba zagotoviti dovolj časa, da se lahko informirajo in sprejmejo dobro premišljene odločitve;
Considers that, given budgetary pressure, efficiency in social spending is of major importance; considers that, in view of the current budgetary pressure, social spending has played a significant economic and social role in softening the effects of the crisis; considers that pay-as-you-go schemes have demonstrated their fundamental role in creating solidarity between generations; also considers that the second and third pillars have a supplementary role to play in reducing pressure; calls on Member States to ensure the best possible mix of forms of pension provision to safeguard pensions in the future; calls upon Member States to improve citizens' access to private savings schemes; points out that, because of the financial crisis, several Member States are planning to introduce changes to their pension systems; urges them, however, to ensure that all pension systems remain stable, reliable and sustainable, and that all changes are made after adequate social dialogue and on the basis of the provision of sufficient information; advocates that, if choices can be made by employees, enough time should be provided for them to make informed and well thought-out decisions;
poudarja, da gospodarska rast in visoka stopnja zaposlenosti izboljšujeta vzdržnost in ustreznost pokojninskih sistemov, visoka inflacija pa jima škoduje;
Stresses that economic growth and high employment rates increase, while high inflation damages, the sustainability and adequacy of pension systems;
meni, da je utaja davkov postala zaskrbljujoč pojav, s katerim se je treba kar najbolj učinkovito spopasti, saj ogroža prihodnjo ustreznost in stabilnost pokojninskih sistemov;
Considers that tax evasion has become a worrying phenomenon and must be combated as effectively as possible, because it undermines the future adequacy and stability of pension systems;
Upokojitvena Starost
Retirement age
meni, da sta glede na demografski trend in potrebo po zagotovitvi, da se pokojnine lahko plačujejo, potrebni številčnejša in daljša udeležba na trgu dela, vendar opaža, da se življenjska doba daljša in da je boljše zdravje pri delu osnovni pogoj za daljšo delovno dobo; poziva države članice, naj s socialnimi partnerji in ustreznimi organizacijami tistim, ki to želijo, omogočijo, da delajo še naprej; poziva države članice, ki so dvignile zakonsko upokojitveno starost ali to nameravajo storiti, naj spodbujajo delo starejših s pomočjo davčnih olajšav in olajšav na področju socialne varnosti; prav tako poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo prilagojene in prožne pogodbe o zaposlitvi ter pokojninske sisteme za starejše osebe in jih s tem spodbujajo, da bodo kombinirali delo in upokojitev, ter naj sprejmejo odvračilne ukrepe, da bodo podjetja težje odpuščala starejše osebe; poziva Komisijo, naj naroči študijo, v kateri bi analizirali, na kakšen način porazdelitev bogastva vpliva na pričakovano življenjsko dobo v državah članicah;
Considers that, in view of demographic trends and the need to ensure that pensions can be paid for, it is necessary for more people to participate in the labour market and to do so for longer, but observes that life expectancy is growing and that better occupational health is a precondition for longer working lives; calls on Member States to make it possible for people who want to carry on working to do so; calls on the Member States which have increased the statutory retirement age or will be doing so to encourage work by older people through fiscal and social security exemptions; also calls on the Member States to create adapted and flexible employment contracts and retirement schemes for older people and to encourage and facilitate combining work with retirement and put in place dissuasive measures so that companies find it harder to make older people redundant; calls on the Commission to set up a study analysing the way wealth distribution is influencing life expectancy in Member States;
ugotavlja, da so velike razlike med zakonsko upokojitveno starostjo in dejansko starostjo, v kateri starejši niso več zaposleni, in priporoča, da se je treba prednostno lotiti zagotavljanja, da lahko zaposleni delajo do zakonske upokojitvene starosti; ugotavlja, da so te razlike posebej očitne pri delavcih v najtežavnejših poklicnih kategorijah; zato poziva države članice in socialne partnerje, naj si izmenjajo informacije o dobri praksi; poleg tega jih poziva, naj sklenejo dogovore, ki bodo pozitivno vplivali na vzdržne pokojnine in na prožen način prispevali k podaljševanju delovnega življenja do zakonske upokojitvene starosti, na primer z razvojem celostnih strategij upravljanja staranja na nacionalni ravni in na ravni podjetij, z razvijanjem novih oblik določb o ravnovesju med poklicnim in zasebnim življenjem, ki bodo prilagojene posebnim potrebam starejših delavcev, in z nagrajevanjem tistih, ki delajo dlje;
Notes that there are major disparities in the statutory retirement age and in the actual age at which older people cease to be employed and recommends that priority should be given to ensuring that employees can work until the statutory retirement age; observes that these disparities are especially salient for employees in the most onerous occupational categories; calls on Member States and social partners, therefore, to exchange information about good practices; also calls on them to conclude agreements which have a positive impact on sustainable pensions and lead, in a flexible way, to a prolongation of working life until the statutory retirement age, for example by developing comprehensive age management strategies at national and company level, by developing new forms of work-life balance provisions adapted to the specific needs of older workers and by rewarding people who work longer;
poudarja, da lahko starejša delovna sila in daljša delovna aktivnost pozitivno prispevata k oživitvi in prihodnji rasti; meni, da mora dinamičen trg dela (starejšim) delavcem, ki opravljajo fizično in/ali umsko zahtevno delo, ponuditi ustvarjalne rešitve, kot so večja prilagodljivost zakonske upokojitvene starosti, delna upokojitev ali prilagojeni delovni pogoji, spodbujanje vseživljenjskega učenja, izboljšanje storitev za iskanje zaposlitve ali prehajanje iz ene zaposlitve v drugo, da bi med zahtevami glede zaposlitve in sposobnostmi delavcev vzpostavili trajno ravnovesje; meni, da je potrebna dejavna politika za preprečevanje diskriminacije na podlagi starosti s spremljanjem pravilnega izvajanja direktiv 2000/78/ES in 2006/54/ES in s spodbujanjem evropske kulture aktivnega staranja, s čimer bi zagotovili vitalno in dostojanstveno življenje starejših; poziva države članice, naj kazni za diskriminacijo na trgu dela združijo s spodbudami za delodajalce, da bodo oblikovali vključujoč trg dela; poziva države članice, naj v okviru reform in podaljšanja delovnega življenja ter s pomočjo Komisije učinkoviteje izvajajo direktive o zdravju in varnosti pri delu;
Stresses that an older labour force and longer working lives can make a positive contribution to the recovery and future growth; considers that, for (older) employees performing physically and/or mentally demanding work, a dynamic labour market must offer creative solutions such as greater flexibility in the statutory retirement age, part-time pensions, adapted working conditions, encouraging lifelong learning, improving job-seeking services or movement from one job to another, to strike a lasting balance between the requirements of employment and the capacities of workers; considers there to be a need for an active policy to prevent discrimination on grounds of age by monitoring the correct implementation of Directives 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC and promoting a European culture of active aging ensuring that older people have a life of vitality and dignity; calls on Member States to combine penalties for labour market discrimination with incentives for employers to create an inclusive labour market; calls on the Member States, in the context of the reforms and the extension of working life and with the assistance of the Commission, to implement more effectively the directives on health and safety at work;
Strategija EU 2020
EU 2020 Strategy
pozdravlja sklicevanje strategije 2020 na vključitev starejših delavcev na trg dela; obžaluje, da strategija 2020 dostojnim, vzdržnim in ustreznim pokojninskim sistemom ne namenja izrecne pozornosti, čeprav je doseganje nekaterih ciljev, ki so v njej navedeni, odvisno od njih; zato predlaga, da bi cilje zelene knjige vključili v strategijo 2020;
Welcomes the reference in the 2020 Strategy to the inclusion of older workers in the labour market; regrets that the 2020 Strategy devotes no explicit attention to decent, sustainable and adequate pension systems, although the attainment of some of the objectives presented in the 2020 Strategy depends on them; suggests, therefore, incorporating the objectives of the Green Paper in the 2020 Strategy;
meni, da bi uspešna strategija 2020 prinesla varnejša in kakovostnejša delovna mesta ter povečala število zaposlenih z ustrezno plačo in delovnimi pogoji, kar bi zvišalo plačila obveznih prispevkov za socialno varnost, ter da bi koristila gospodarski rasti, s čimer bi se okrepila vzdržnost in ustreznost pokojninskih sistemov;
Considers that, if the 2020 Strategy is successful, this will mean that more secure, quality jobs will be created and that more people are in work with appropriate wages and terms of employment, which will entail an increase in payments of compulsory social security contributions, and that economic growth will benefit from this, thus enhancing both the sustainability and adequacy of pension systems;
v skladu s strategijo 2020 podpira usmerjeno in dejavno politiko trga dela, s katero bi povečali zaposlovanje tistih, ki so sedaj nezadostno zastopani na trgu dela, zlasti najbolj ranljivih; meni, da bi morala EU razviti nove kazalnike za spremljanje učinka pokojninskih reform za ranljive skupine; poudarja, da je nezakonito delo v Evropski uniji še vedno močno razširjeno in da to slabi možnosti socialne politike; poziva pristojne organe v državah članicah k spodbujanju socialne vključenosti in preprečevanju neprijavljenega dela z namenom izboljšanja uravnoteženosti pokojninskih sistemov;
Supports, in accordance with the 2020 Strategy, a targeted and active labour market policy which will lead to increased participation in employment by those currently under-represented in the labour market, particularly the most vulnerable; considers that the EU should develop new indicators to monitor the impact of pension reforms on vulnerable groups; stresses that within the European Union illegal work is still widespread and that this weakens social policy options; calls on the competent bodies in the Member States to promote social inclusion and combat undeclared work in order to improve the balance of pension systems;
Direktiva o dejavnostih in nadzoru institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje (IORP)
IORP Directive
ugotavlja, da države članice na splošno zamujajo z izvajanjem direktive IORP; poziva Komisijo, naj po potrebi ukrepa proti državam članicam, da bi tako zagotovila ustrezno in pravočasno izvajanje te direktive;
Observes that the implementation of the IORP Directive by Member States generally has been delayed; calls on the Commission, if necessary, to take action against Member States in order to ensure correct and timely implementation of the IORP Directive;
se strinja, da bi morala biti cilj visoka stopnja varnosti za bodoče upokojence ob sprejemljivih stroških pokroviteljskih podjetij ter v okviru vzdržnih pokojninskih sistemov;
Agrees that a high degree of security for future pensioners, at a reasonable cost for the sponsoring undertakings and in the context of sustainable pension systems, should be the goal;
ugotavlja, da je v členu 15(6) direktive IORP o izračunavanju zavarovalno-tehničnih rezervacij navedeno, da „Komisija predlaga vse potrebne ukrepe za preprečitev morebitnih izkrivljanj zaradi različnih stopenj obrestnih mer in za zaščito interesov upravičencev in članov katerega koli načrta“; poziva Komisijo, naj pred revizijo direktive IORP opravi oceno učinka in upošteva trend povečevanja števila sistemov z določenimi prispevki in zmanjševanja števila sistemov z določenimi pravicami;
Notes that Article 15(6) of the IORP Directive states, with regard to the calculation of technical provisions, that ‘the Commission shall propose any necessary measures to prevent possible distortions caused by different levels of interest rates and to protect the interest of beneficiaries and members of any scheme’; calls on the Commission to carry out an impact assessment before revising the IORP Directive and to take account of the trend towards more defined-contribution schemes and fewer defined-benefit schemes;
opominja, da je v direktivi IORP navedeno, da je „pravi notranji trg finančnih storitev (...) bistvenega pomena za gospodarsko rast in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest v Skupnosti“ in da „s tem predstavlja ta direktiva prvi korak na poti k notranjemu trgu za zagotavljanje poklicnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, organiziranega v evropskem merilu“;
Recalls the statements in the IORP Directive that ‘a genuine internal market for financial services is crucial for economic growth and job creation in the Community’ and that ‘this Directive thus represents a first step on the way to an internal market for occupational retirement provision organised on a European scale’;
poudarja, da bi moral novoustanovljeni evropski nadzorni organ (Evropski organ za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine) v celoti uporabiti svoje pristojnosti in imeti pomembno vlogo pri pripravljalnem procesu za pregled direktive IORP ter pripravi pravnih predpisov, denimo osnutka tehničnih standardov, smernic in priporočil za režim plačilne sposobnosti; poudarja, da se direktiva IORP ne bi smela uporabljati za javne pokojninske obveznosti ali poklicne pokojninske sheme iz prvega stebra;
Emphasises that the newly established European supervisory authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority) must make full use of its competences and play an important role in the preparatory process for a review of the IORP Directive, and in developing legal provisions, such as draft technical standards, guidelines and recommendations for a solvency regime; recalls that the IORP Directive should not apply to any public pension liabilities or work-related pension systems in the first pillar;
meni, da so kvalitativni elementi Solventnosti II koristna izhodiščna točka za okrepitev nazora institucij za poklicno pokojninsko zavarovanje; ugotavlja, da to zlasti velja za zahteve v zvezi z dobrim obvladovanjem tveganja;
Considers the qualitative elements of Solvency II to be a valuable starting point for enhancing the supervision of IORPs; notes that this applies in particular to requirements in relation to good risk management;
Mobilnost in prenosi
Mobility and transfers