natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka a a (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point a a (new)
(aa) je očitno, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za begunca ali za status begunca v državi članici v skladu z Direktivo [.../../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih] ali
(aa) the applicant clearly does not qualify as a refugee or for refugee status in a Member State under Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive]; or
(da) so bile prosilčeve navedbe očitno nekonsistentne, protislovne, malo verjetne, nezadostne ali lažne, zaradi česar je njegova prošnja očitno neprepričljiva glede trditve, da je prosilec žrtev preganjanja v smislu Direktive […/.../ES][direktive o zahtevanih pogojih]; ali
(da) the applicant has made clearly inconsistent, contradictory, improbable, insufficient or false representations which make his/her claim plainly unconvincing in relation to his/her having been the object of persecution referred to in Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive]; or
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka d b (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point d b (new)
(db) je prosilec vložil naknadno prošnjo, ki očitno ne navaja nikakršnih novih pomembnih elementov o okoliščinah, ki ga zadevajo, ali o razmerah v njegovi izvorni državi; ali
(db) the applicant has submitted a subsequent application which clearly does not raise any relevant new elements with respect to his/her particular circumstances or to the situation in his/her country of origin; or
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka d c (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point dc (new)
(dc) prosilec brez upravičenega razloga ni vložil svoje prošnje že prej, če je imel za to možnost; ali
(dc) the applicant has failed without reasonable cause to make his/her application earlier, having had opportunity to do so; or
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka f a (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point f a (new)
(fa) prosilec brez pravega razloga ni uspel izpolniti obveznosti za sodelovanje pri razjasnitvi pomembnih dejstev in razkritju svoje identitete v skladu s členom 4(1) in (2) Direktive […./../ES] [direktive o zahtevanih pogojih] ali v skladu s členom 12(1) in (2)(a do c) in členom 24(1) te direktive, ali
(fa) the applicant has failed without good reason to comply with his/her obligations to cooperate in the examination of the facts of his/her case and the establishment of his/her identity referred to in Article 4(1) and (2) of Directive […/../EC] [the Qualification Directive] or in Article 12(1) and (2)(a), (b) and (c) and Article 24(1) of this Directive; or
Člen 27 – odstavek 6 – točka f b (novo)
Article 27 – paragraph 6 – point f b (new)
(fb) je prosilec nezakonito vstopil na ozemlje države članice ali nezakonito podaljšal svoje bivanje in se brez pravega razloga ni javil oblastem in/ali vložil prošnje za azil v najkrajšem možnem času glede na okoliščine njegovega vstopa; ali
(fb) the applicant entered the territory of the Member State unlawfully or extended his/her stay unlawfully and, without good reason, has either not presented himself/herself to the authorities and/or filed an application for asylum as soon as possible, given the circumstances of his/her entry; or
(fc) prosilec zaradi resnih razlogov lahko predstavlja grožnjo za nacionalno varnost države članice ali če je bil prosilec zaradi resnih razlogov javne varnosti in javnega reda po nacionalnem pravu prisilno izgnan.
(fc) the applicant may for serious reasons be considered a danger to the national security of the Member State, or the applicant has been forcibly expelled for serious reasons of public security and public order under national law.
Dejstvo, da je bila prošnja za mednarodno zaščito vložena po nezakonitem vstopu na ozemlje ali na meji, vključno s tranzitnimi območji, ter odsotnost dokumentov
The fact that an application for international protection was submitted after an irregular entry into the territory or at the border, including in transit zones, as well as the lack of documents
Ne glede na člen 23
Without prejudice to Article 23,
države članice štejejo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito za neutemeljeno le, če je organ za presojo ugotovil, da prosilec ne izpolnjuje pogojev za mednarodno zaščito v skladu z Direktivo […./../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih].
Member States shall only consider an application for international protection as unfounded if the determining authority has established that the applicant does not qualify for international protection pursuant to Directive […./../EC] [the Qualification Directive].
države članice opravijo
Member States
osebni razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje.
shall conduct a personal interview on the admissibility of the application.
organ za presojo opravi
the determining authority
Države članice zagotovijo, da uradnik organa za presojo, ki bo opravil razgovor o dopustnosti prošnje, ne nosi uniforme.
Member States shall ensure that the member of staff of the determining authority who conducts the interview on the admissibility of the application does not wear a uniform.
(b) sicer v tej državi uživa
(b) he/she otherwise enjoys
zaščito, vključno z načelom nevračanja,
protection in that country, including benefiting from the principle of non-refoulement;
Pri uporabi koncepta prve države azila za okoliščine posameznega prosilca za mednarodno zaščito
In applying the concept of first country of asylum to the particular circumstances of an applicant for international protection Member States
države članice upoštevajo člen 32(1).
take into account Article 32 (1).
Prosilec lahko izpodbija uporabo koncepta prve države azila z utemeljitvijo, da ta država v njegovem primeru ni varna.
The applicant shall be allowed to challenge the application of the concept of first country of asylum on the grounds that the first country of asylum in question is not safe in his or her particular case.
Države članice lahko uporabijo koncept varne tretje države samo, če so pristojni organi prepričani, da se z osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, v zadevni tretji državi ravna v skladu z naslednjimi načeli:
Member States may apply the safe third country concept only where the competent authorities are satisfied that a person seeking international protection will be treated in accordance with the following principles in the third country concerned:
(a) s pravili, ki zahtevajo zvezo med osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katerih bi bilo smiselno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
(a) rules requiring a connection between the person seeking international protection and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for that person to go to that country;
Prosilcu se omogoči, da lahko izpodbija obstoj zveze med njim in tretjo državo v skladu s točko (a).Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji izključno na tem členu, države članice:
The applicant shall also be allowed to challenge the existence of a connection between him/her and the third country in accordance with point (a) .When implementing a decision solely based on this Article, Member States shall:
Države članice lahko ohranijo ali sprejmejo zakonodajo, ki v skladu s Prilogo II dopušča nacionalno označitev varnih izvornih držav za namene obravnavanja prošenj za mednarodno zaščito.
Member States may retain or introduce legislation that allows, in accordance with Annex II, for the national designation of safe countries of origin for the purposes of examining applications for international protection. .
Ocenjevanje, ali je država varna izvorna država v skladu s tem členom, temelji na različnih virih podatkov, vključujoč zlasti podatke iz drugih držav članic, Evropskega urada za podporo azilu, UNHCR, Sveta Evrope in drugih ustreznih mednarodnih organizacij.
The assessment of whether a country is a safe country of origin in accordance with this Article shall be based on a range of sources of information, including in particular information from other Member States, the European Asylum Support Office, the UNHCR, the Council of Europe and other relevant international organisations.
Kadar oseba, ki je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito v državi članici, poda naknadne navedbe ali vloži naknadno prošnjo v isti državi članici, ta država članica obravnava te naknadne navedbe ali elemente naknadne prošnje v okviru obravnavanja predhodne prošnje ali v okviru preizkusa pravnega sredstva ali odločanja o pravnem sredstvu zoper odločbo, če lahko
Where a person who has applied for international protection in a Member State makes further representations or a subsequent application in the same Member State, that Member State shall examine these further representations or the elements of the subsequent application in the framework of the examination of the previous application or in the framework of the examination of the decision under review or appeal, insofar as the
Člen 35 – odstavek 8 – pododstavek 1 – uvodni del
Article 35 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
na podlagi dokončnega sklepa o nedopustnosti naknadne prošnje v skladu s členom 29(2)(d) ali dokončne odločbe o zavrnitvi naknadne prošnje kot neutemeljene
following a final decision to consider a subsequent application inadmissible pursuant to Article 29 (2) (d) or a final decision to reject a subsequent application as unfounded
zadevna oseba pred izvršitvijo odločbe o vrnitvi vloži novo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito v isti državi članici, lahko navedena država članica:
, the person concerned lodges a new application for international protection in the same Member State before a return decision has been enforced, that Member State may:
po zaključku postopka o prvi prošnji v skladu z odstavkom 2
after the procedure relating to the initial application has been terminated pursuant to paragraph 2,
pred izvršitvijo odločbe o vrnitvi vloži novo prošnjo za mednarodno zaščito v isti državi članici,
the person concerned lodges a new application for international protection in the same Member State before a return decision has been enforced,
za novo prošnjo pa ni potrebno nadaljnje obravnavanje v skladu s tem členom,
and that new application does not lead to a further examination pursuant to this Article,
lahko navedena država članica:
that Member State may:
(a) dopustnosti prošenj
(a) the admissibility of an application
v smislu člena 29
, within the meaning of Article 29,
, ki so bile vložene na teh krajih, in/ali
made at such locations; and/or
Zadrževanje prosilcev na mejah držav članic ali tranzitnih območjih je enako pridržanju iz člena 22.
The holding of applicants at Member States' borders or transit zones is equivalent to placing them in detention, as referred to in Article 22.
varne tretje države
safe third countries concept
Za namene odstavka 1 se
for the purposes of paragraph 1
Tretja država
A third country
lahko šteje za varno tretjo državo samo, če
only be considered as a safe third country where
se bo z osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, v zadevni tretji državi ravnalo v skladu z naslednjimi načeli in pogoji
a person seeking international protection will be treated in accordance with the following principles and conditions in the third country concerned
je ratificirala in spoštuje določbe Ženevske konvencije brez kakršnih koli geografskih omejitev;
it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations;
življenje in svoboda nista ogroženi zaradi rase, vere, državljanstva, pripadnosti določeni družbeni skupini ali političnega prepričanja;
life and liberty are not threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion;
ima z zakonom predpisan azilni postopek; in
it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law; and
ni tveganja resne škode, kot je opredeljeno v [Direktivi …/.../ES] [direktiva o zahtevanih pogojih];
there is no risk of serious harm as defined in [Directive …./../EC] [the Qualification Directive];
je ratificirala Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter spoštuje njene določbe, vključno s standardi za učinkovita pravna sredstva.
it has ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and observes its provisions, including the standards relating to effective remedies.
v skladu z Ženevsko konvencijo se spoštuje načelo nevračanja;
the principle of non-refoulement in accordance with the Geneva Convention is respected;
(d) spoštuje se prepoved odstranitve, ki bi kršila prepoved mučenja ter krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, kakor je določena v mednarodnem pravu;
(d) the prohibition of removal, in violation of the right to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment as laid down in international law, is respected;
(f) je ratificirala in spoštuje določbe Ženevske konvencije brez kakršnih koli geografskih omejitev;
(f) it has ratified and observes the provisions of the Geneva Convention without any geographical limitations;
(g) ima z zakonom predpisan azilni postopek; ter
(g) it has in place an asylum procedure prescribed by law; and
(h) sta jo za varno označila Svet in Parlament v skladu z odstavkom 2.
(h) it has been so designated by the Council and the Parliament in accordance with paragraph 2.
Evropski parlament in Svet v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom sprejmeta ali spremenita skupen seznam tretjih držav, ki štejejo za varne tretje države za namene odstavka 1.
The European Parliament and the Council shall, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, adopt or amend a common list of third countries that shall be regarded as safe third countries for the purposes of paragraph 1.
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1 in
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and
Zadevne države članice v nacionalnem pravu v skladu z načelom nevračanja določijo načine izvajanja določb odstavka 1
The Member States concerned shall lay down in national law the modalities for implementing the provisions of paragraph 1 and
in pravila, ki zahtevajo:
rules requiring:
(a) zvezo med osebo, ki išče mednarodno zaščito, in zadevno tretjo državo, na podlagi katere bi bilo smiselno, da ta oseba odide v to državo;
(a) a connection between the person seeking international protection and the third country concerned on the basis of which it would be reasonable for that person to go to that country;
Pri izvajanju odločbe, ki temelji
When implementing a decision
na tem členu, države članice
based on this Article, the Member States concerned shall
o tem obvestijo prosilca
inform the applicant accordingly
Države članice ne določijo nacionalnih seznamov varnih izvornih držav ali nacionalnih seznamov varnih tretjih držav.
Member States shall not designate national lists of safe countries of origin or national lists of safe third countries.
Države članice predvidijo
Member States shall provide for
roke in druga potrebna pravila za uveljavljanje pravice prosilca do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva v skladu z odstavkom 1.
time-limits and other necessary rules for the applicant to exercise his/her right to an effective remedy pursuant to paragraph 1.
Države članice določijo minimalni rok 45 delovnih dni, v času katerega lahko prosilci uveljavljajo pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva.
The Member States shall set a minimum time limit of forty-five working days during which applicants may exercise their right to an effective remedy.
Za prosilce, katerih prošnje so obravnavane po postopku pospešenega obravnavanja v skladu s členom 27(6), države članice predvidijo minimalni rok 30 delovnih dni.
For applicants under the accelerated procedure referred to in Article 27(6), the Member States shall lay down a minimum time limit of thirty working days.
V primeru odločbe, sprejete v postopku pospešenega obravnavanja v skladu s členom 27(6), in sklepa o tem, da je prošnja v skladu s členom 29(2)(d) nedopustna, ter če
In the case of a decision taken in the accelerated procedure pursuant to Article 27 (6) and of a decision to consider an application inadmissible pursuant to Article 29 (2) (d), and
v teh primerih
if, in such cases,
v nacionalni zakonodaji pravica ostati v državi članici do zaključka postopka s pravnim sredstvom ni določena, sodišče na podlagi prošnje zadevnega prosilca ali na lastno pobudo odloči, ali lahko prosilec ostane na ozemlju države članice.
the right to remain in the Member State pending the outcome of the remedy is not foreseen under national legislation, a court or tribunal shall have the power to rule whether or not the applicant may remain on the territory of the Member State, either upon request of the concerned applicant or acting on its own motion.
Države članice omogočijo prosilcem, da ostanejo na njihovem ozemlju do zaključka postopka iz odstavka 6.
Member States shall allow the applicant to remain in the territory pending the outcome of the procedure referred to in paragraph 6.
Države članice omogočijo prosilcem, da ostanejo na njihovem ozemlju do zaključka postopka iz odstavka 6;
Member States shall allow the applicant to remain in the territory pending the outcome of the procedure referred to in paragraph 6
izjema se lahko dodeli za naknadne prošnje, kjer ni nadaljnjega obravnavanja v skladu s členoma 35 in 36, če je bila sprejeta odločba o vrnitvi v skladu s členom 3(4) Direktive 2008/115/ES, in za odločbe v postopku v skladu s členom 38, če to določa nacionalna zakonodaja.
; an exception may be made for subsequent applications which do not lead to a further examination pursuant to Articles 35 and 36, if a return decision pursuant to Article 3(4) of Directive 2008/115/EC has been taken, and for decisions in the procedure pursuant to Article 38 if this is provided for in national legislation.
Po predložitvi poročila Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te direktive v državah članicah najmanj
After presenting the report, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application of this Directive in the Member States at least every
Komisija najpozneje […] poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi
No later than […], the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the application
in finančnih stroških
and the financial cost
te direktive v državah članicah in predlaga vse potrebne spremembe.
of this Directive in the Member States and shall propose any amendments that are necessary.
Države članice pošljejo Komisiji vse
Member States shall send the Commission all the information
informacije in finančne
and financial data
podatke, ki so potrebni za pripravo tega poročila.
that is appropriate for drawing up this report.
Države članice sprejmejo zakone in druge predpise, potrebne za uskladitev s členom 27(3) do [
Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Article 27(3) by [
od dneva prenosa direktive v nacionalno zakonodajo].
from the date of the transposition].
dve leti
two years
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. aprila 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o evropski statistiki turizma ( KOM(2010)0117 – C7-0085/2010 – 2010/0063(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 6 April 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning European Statistics on tourism ( COM(2010)0117 – C7-0085/2010 – 2010/0063(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0117 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0117 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 338(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0085/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 338(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0085/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju prispevkov, ki sta ju glede osnutka zakonodajnega akta predložila portugalska Republiška skupščina in italijanski Senat,
having regard to the contributions submitted by the Assembly of the Republic of Portugal and by the Italian Senate on the draft legislative act,
ob upoštevanju pisne zaveze predstavnika Sveta z dne 22. marca 2011 o odobritvi stališča Parlamenta v skladu s členom 294(4) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of 22 March 2011 to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7-0329/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0329/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 338(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union, and in particular Article 338(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisije,
Having regard to the proposal from the European-Commission,
po predložitvi
After transmission of the
osnutka zakonodajnega akta
draft legislative act
nacionalnim parlamentom,
to the national parliaments,
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. aprila 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 6 April 2011.
Evropski svet je v Sklepih predsedstva z dne 14. decembra 2007 poudaril ključno vlogo, ki jo ima turizem pri zagotavljanju rasti in novih delovnih mest v
The European Council, in its Presidency Conclusions of 14 December 2007, stressed the crucial role that tourism plays in generating growth and jobs in the
, ter pozval Komisijo, države članice, industrijo in druge zainteresirane strani, naj združijo sile pri pravočasnem izvajanju programa za trajnostni in konkurenčni evropski turizem.
and called on the Commission, Member States, industry and other stakeholders to join forces in the timely implementation of the Agenda for a sustainable and competitive European tourism.
Za oceno njegove konkurenčnosti
Any appraisal of its competitiveness
je treba dobro poznati obseg turizma, njegove značilnosti, značilnosti turista in turistično porabo
requires a good knowledge of the volume of tourism, its characteristics, the profile of the tourist and tourism expenditure
ter koristi za nacionalna gospodarstva držav članic
and benefits for national economies of the Member States
Da se lahko izmerijo sezonski vplivi povpraševanja po nastanitvenih gostinskih zmogljivostih in s tem pomaga državnim organom in gospodarskim subjektom razviti primernejše strategije in politike za izboljšanje sezonske razširjenosti, so potrebni mesečni podatki.
Monthly information is needed in order to measure the seasonal influences of demand on tourist accommodation capacity and thereby help public authorities and economic operators develop more suitable strategies and policies for improving the seasonal spread of holidays and tourism activities.
Glede na velikost MSP je treba preučiti potencialno upravno obremenitev in uvesti sistem pragov, tako da bodo zadovoljene potrebe uporabnikov, hkrati pa zmanjšati obremenitev vprašancev, pristojnih za zagotavljanje statističnih informacij, zlasti MSP.
Given the size of SMEs, the potential administrative burden needs to be considered, and a system of thresholds should be introduced so that users' needs can be met, while at the same time reducing the burden of response on the parties responsible for providing statistical information, particularly SMEs.
Spreminjajoča se turistična gibanja po začetku veljavnosti Direktive Sveta 95/57/ES z dne 23. novembra 1995 o zbiranju statističnih podatkov na področju turizma UL L 291, 6.12.1995, str.
The changing nature of tourism behaviour since the entry into force of Council Directive 95/57/EC of 23 November 1995 on the collection of statistical information in the field of tourism OJ L 291, 6.12.1995, p.