natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom "Sodelovanje z državami AKP, ki so vpletene v oborožene spopade" ( KOM(1999)0240 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Cooperation with ACP countries involved in armed conflicts" ( COM(1999)0240 ),
ob upoštevanju obvestila tematskega oddelka generalnega direktorata za zunanjo politiko Evropskega parlamenta iz junija 2004 o prednostih in slabostih proračunske pomoči kot načina za posredovanje pomoči,
having regard to the Note of the Policy Department of the Directorate-General for External Policies of the European Parliament, on the advantages and disadvantages of budget support as a modality for the delivery of aid, of June 2004,
ob upoštevanju srečanja na visoki ravni odbora OECD za razvojno pomoč (DAC), ki je bilo marca 2005 v Parizu,
having regard to the OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) high level meeting held in Paris in March 2005,
ob upoštevanju pariške deklaracije o učinkovitosti pomoči z dne 2. marca 2005,
having regard to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, dated 2 March, 2005,
ob upoštevanju okvira za ocenjevanje uspešnosti programa javnih financ in finančne odgovornosti (PEFA) iz junija 2005,
having regard to Performance Measurement Framework of the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability Programme (PEFA) of June 2005,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6-0005/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0005/2007 ),
ker se nadaljuje razprava o tem, kako lahko razvojni skladi najučinkoviteje delujejo, da bodo koristili ljudem v državah prejemnicah,
whereas there are ongoing discussions on how to obtain the most effective results from development funds in order to benefit people in recipient countries,
ker je treba pojasniti, da je bilo v mnogih delih sveta nekaj desetletno prizadevanje za izboljšanje dejanskih življenjskih razmer ljudi v državah v razvoju neuspešno zaradi različnih zapletenih razlogov in okoliščin, od katerih je mogoče nekatere jasno opredeliti kot slabo upravljanje, zloraba finančnih sredstev in korupcija,
whereas it must be stated that efforts over the course of several decades to improve the day-to-day living conditions of people in developing countries have failed in many parts of the world, for a variety of complex reasons and circumstances, some of which can clearly be identified as bad governance, misuse of funds and corruption,
ker je treba potrebo po razvojnem sodelovanju nenehno utemeljevati pred splošno javnostjo kot tudi v odnosih do drugih zainteresiranih strani na področju javnih financ,
whereas the need to engage in development cooperation requires continuous justification not only vis-à-vis the general public but also in the context of interaction with other stakeholders in the field of public expenditure,
ker je proračunska podpora priznana kot eden od bistvenih instrumentov razvojnega sodelovanja Evropske skupnosti in je približno petina pomoči ERS v obliki nenamenske proračunske podpore,
whereas budget support is acknowledged as an essential instrument of European Community development cooperation and whereas approximately one fifth of EDF aid is in the form of untargeted budget support,
ker je sestanek na visoki ravni odbora za razvojno pomoč v Parizu marca 2005 priznal potrebo po zagotavljanju predvidljive medvladne podpore s čim večjo uporabo lastnih sistemov držav prejemnic,
whereas the importance of providing predictable government-to-government support using recipient countries' own systems, as far as possible, was recognised by the DAC high level meeting held in Paris in March 2005,
ker proračunska podpora omogoča večjo usklajenost med donatorji,
whereas budget support allows for closer donor coordination,
ker so učinkovite strukture držav upravičenk tako v smislu delujoče demokracije, spoštovanja temeljnih svoboščin, človekovih pravic in političnega pluralizma kot v smislu proračunskih postopkov, pristojnosti glede izdatkov in nadzora nad opravljanjem storitev bistveni za učinkovitost proračunske podpore,
whereas effective recipient state structures, both in terms of a functioning democracy respecting fundamental freedoms, human rights and political pluralism and in terms of budgetary processes, expenditure competency and service provision that are amenable to scrutiny, are crucial to the effectiveness of budget support,
ker se lahko s proračunsko podporo državo prejemnico pooblasti za odločanje o svojem postopku razvoja,
whereas budget support can empower the recipient to determine its development process,
ker proces proračunske podpore poteka v okviru partnerstev z določanjem prednostnih nalog in ocenjevanje ter s stalnim političnim dialogom med donatorji in državami prejemnicami,
whereas the budget support process takes place within a framework of partnership, in terms of priority setting and assessment, through continuous donor-recipient policy dialogue,
ker mora proračunska podpora tudi spodbujati krepitev demokratičnega postopka, ki bo omogočil politično delovanje civilne družbe, zlasti prek sodelovanja pri načrtovanju izkoreninjena revščine in razvojne strategije, ter pospešil parlamentarni nadzor nad razvojno politiko in porabo proračunskih sredstev,
whereas budget support should also encourage the strengthening of democratic processes, affording policy space to civil society, especially through involvement in the shaping of a poverty reduction and development strategy, and promoting parliamentary scrutiny of development policy and budget spending,
ker je lahko proračunska podpora v obliki splošne proračunske podpore, ki zajema splošen makroekonomski in proračunski okvir, ali sektorske proračunske podpore,
whereas budget support can be either general budget support, which covers the overall macro-economic and budget framework, or sectoral budget support,
ker je pri razporeditvi proračunske podpore treba razmisliti o "vrzeli pri zunanjem financiranju", stopnji revščine, dobrem upravljanju, delovanju v preteklosti, zavezanosti razvoju in realni oceni mogočih rezultatov v zvezi z zmanjšanjem revščine, rastjo in industrijskimi reformami,
whereas the key considerations in deciding the allocation of budget support funding are: the 'external financing gap', the degree of poverty, good governance, past performance, development commitment and a realistic assessment of possible results, in terms of poverty reduction, growth and institutional reform,
ker so finančna sredstva, zagotovljena kot proračunska podpora, v celoti zamenljiva, ker se prenosi opravijo neposredno na zakladni račun države, kar posledično pomeni, da je za nadzor nad uporabo teh sredstev in lastništvo odgovorna država prejemnica,
whereas funds provided as general budget support are fully fungible, as transfers are made directly into the treasury account of a country, which effectively means that control over, ownership of and accountability with regard to the utilisation of those funds rests with the recipient,
ker so v členih 61(2) in 67 Sporazuma o partnerstvu iz Cotonouja jasno določeni pogoji upravičenosti države prejemnice do proračunske pomoči, med katerimi so izrecno zahtevani izpolnjevanje standardov upravljanja javnih izdatkov, makroekonomske in sektorskih politik ter javnih naročilih, poleg tega pa morajo donatorji in države prejemnice zagotoviti, da je prilagoditev gospodarsko izvedljiva ter družbeno in politično sprejemljiva,
whereas Articles 61(2) and 67 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement clearly determine the conditions governing the eligibility of a recipient country for budget support, expressly stating the need for standards regarding public expenditure management, macro-economic and sectoral policies and public procurement and, furthermore, requiring the donor and recipient to ensure that adjustment is economically viable and socially and politically workable,
ker je delujoča parlamentarna demokracija, v kateri se spoštujejo temeljne svoboščine in človekove pravice, vključno s političnim pluralizmom in učinkovitim sistemom upravljanja javnih financ, predhodni pogoj za proračunsko pomoč, ki bi jo bilo treba ovrednotiti glede na stopnjo odgovornega vodenja države, nadzor s strani demokratično izvoljenega parlamenta, pravno državo, odgovornost vlade, pristojnosti, dobro opredeljeno makroekonomsko, razvojno in sektorsko politiko ter stopnjo odprtosti in preglednosti javnih naročil,
whereas a functioning parliamentary democracy respecting fundamental freedoms and human rights, including political pluralism, and an effective public financial management system are prerequisites for budget support, and should be assessed in terms of the extent to which the recipient country is characterised by good governance, scrutiny by a democratically elected parliament, the rule of law, government accountability, competence, well-defined macro-economic, developmental and sectoral policies and the degree of openness and transparency of its public procurement,
ker je treba tveganje oceniti glede na sposobnost zadevnih državnih organov, da upravljajo in uporablja finančna sredstva, glede na dobro upravljanje, zavezanost načelom razvoja, prisotnosti korupcije, glede na demokracijo in človekove pravice,
whereas risk should be measured in terms of the ability of the state bodies concerned to administer and implement funds, good governance, commitment to development principles, the incidence of corruption, democracy and human rights,
ker so učinkovito upravljanje javnih financ in proračunski sistemi, namenjeni vzpostavljanju stabilnega makroekonomskega okolja, bistven pogoj razvoja,
whereas effective public financial management and budgetary systems aimed at creating a stable macro-economic climate are essential preconditions for development,
ker ima veliko partnerskih držav, ki prejemajo proračunsko podporo, zlasti države AKP, izjemno slabe sisteme upravljanja javnih financ,
whereas a number of budget support partner countries, especially in the ACP states, have extremely poor public financial management systems,
ker morajo donatorji in države prejemnice v okviru partnerstva skupaj učinkovito analizirati dosežke pri izvajanju razvojne politike in reform, ki so ključne za oceno izvedljivosti proračunske podpore,
whereas the donor-recipient partnership needs to ensure an effective joint analysis of the results of development policy implementation and reforms which are crucial to the assessment of the viability of budget support,
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj proračunsko pomoč uporabljajo le, če je možno dokazati koristi tega mehanizma na podlagi jasnih in objektivnih meril ter šele po celostni oceni s tem povezanega tveganja;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use budget support only if the net benefits of such a mechanism can be demonstrated in the light of clearly objectifiable criteria, and only after a full assessment of the risks involved;
poudarja, da je proračunska pomoč kot oblika pomoči lahko uspešna samo, če oba partnerja v celoti prevzameta odgovornosti v pravem duhu partnerstva in lastništva;
Stresses that budget support as an aid modality can be successful only if both partners fully assume their responsibilities in a true spirit of partnership and ownership;
poziva, da se proračunska podpora čim bolj osredotoči na razvoj prednostnih nalog za zmanjšanje revščine, da imajo te prednostne naloge v političnem dialogu med donatorji in državami prejemnicami osrednjo vlogo in da se zagotovi parlamentarni nadzor tako v odnosu do donatorjev kot prejemnikov;
Calls for budget support to focus, as far as possible, on poverty reduction development priorities, for those priorities to be given a central role in the donor-recipient policy dialogue and for parliamentary scrutiny to be ensured in respect of both the donor and the recipient;
poudarja pomen krepitve zmogljivosti vlad držav prejemnic, ki morajo prevzeti odločnejše vodstvo pri usklajevanju razvojne pomoči;
Stresses the importance of capacity-building by recipient governments, which have to assume a stronger leadership role in development assistance coordination;
poudarja pomen ustvarjanja kulture odgovornosti, v kateri so v celoti vključeni parlamenti in najvišje revizorske institucije; priznava, da mora biti proračunska pomoč tesno povezana s krepitvijo civilne družbe;
Stresses the importance of creating a culture of accountability which fully involves parliaments and the supreme audit institutions; recognises that budget support must go hand in hand with the strengthening of civil society;
meni, da je pravična uporaba jasnih, nedvoumnih in realnih pogojev, o katerih so se dogovorile vse stranke in so priloženi programu proračunske podpore, bistveni za instrument in nujni za preprečevanje nepredvidljivih nihanj pri dodeljevanju pomoči;
Regards the equitable application of clear, explicit and realistic conditions, agreed upon by all parties and attached to the budget support programme, as essential to the instrument in question and necessary in order to counteract unpredictable volatility in the granting of aid;
izreka pohvalo merilom o izpolnjevanju pogojev za uporabo proračunske podpore v državah AKP, ki so določena v členih 61(2) in 67 Sporazuma o partnerstvu iz Cotonuoja;
Commends the eligibility criteria for the use of budget support with ACP states, as enshrined in Articles 61(2) and 67 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement;
je zaskrbljen zaradi odločitve, da se proračunska podpora uporabi v Malaviju, ki je bil poznan po velikem tveganju, in v Keniji, ki so ji vse druge države članice začasno preklicale proračunsko podporo, kar povzroča dvom o sposobnosti Komisije, da učinkovito uporabi ta instrument;
Is concerned about the decision to use budget support in Malawi, where there were considerable known risks, and Kenya, in regard to which all Member States have suspended budget support, thus calling into question the Commission's ability to use this instrument effectively;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da je Komisija v nekaterih primerih nezadostno utemeljila dodelitev proračunskih sredstev državam s slabim sistemom upravljanja javnega financiranja nezadostni in da je bila razlaga člena 61(2) in 67 Sporazuma o partnerstvu iz Cotonouja pogosto široka in subjektivna;
Is concerned by the findings of the Court of Auditors that, in some cases, the Commission's reasons for granting budget support to countries with poor public financial management systems were insufficient, and that Articles 61(2) and 67 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement were often given a broad and subjective interpretation;
je zaskrbljen, ker je Računsko sodišče pri Komisiji našlo nepravilnosti v splošni skladnosti instrumenta ter pri nadzoru, spremljanju in podpori mehanizmov za proračunski nadzor v državah prejemnicah, torej parlamentih in najvišjih revizijskih institucijah; je zaskrbljen tudi, ker se tehnična pomoč premalo uporablja; vsi ti elementi so nepogrešljiv del instrumenta;
Is alarmed that the Court of Auditors has found inadequacies in the Commission's overall coherence of the budget support instrument and in the controls and monitoring and support for the recipient countries' own budgetary scrutiny mechanisms, namely the parliaments and supreme audit institutions of the countries concerned, and that technical assistance is being underused; all of these elements being indispensable to the instrument;
priznava, da lahko v posamezni državi obstaja le en program makroekonomskih reform, ki ga običajno usmerjajo mednarodne finančne ustanove, vendar si morajo Komisija in države članice prizadevati za dejavno vlogo pri poskusu vplivanja na politiko v zvezi s tem programom;
Recognises that there can only be one macro-economic reform programme in any given country, which is usually directed by the international financial institutions, but in relation to which the Commission and Member States should seek to play an active role in an effort to influence policy;
želi spomniti, da imajo makroekonomske reforme lahko trajnostni učinek le, če celostno zaobjamejo cilje človeškega in družbenega razvoja;
Recalls that macro-economic reforms can have a sustainable effect only when they fully embrace the objectives of human and social development;
verjame, da bi morala sektorska proračunska podpora ali pristop na sektorski ravni veljati za prednostna instrumenta poseganja v sektorja zdravstva in izobraževanja;
Believes that sectoral budget support or sector-wide approaches should be considered as privileged instruments for intervention in the health and education sectors;
potrjuje, da bi moral biti vsaj 20 % delež celotnih letnih obveznosti dodeljen dejavnostim v sektorjih osnovnega in srednjega šolstva ter osnovnega zdravstva (vključno s spolnim in reproduktivnim zdravjem);
Reaffirms that 20% of total annual commitments should be allocated to activities in the sectors of basic and secondary education and basic health (including sexual and reproductive health);
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme in izvaja nov okvir mednarodnega ocenjevanja uspešnosti, da bi presodila upravljanje z javnimi financami posamezne države, kot je določen s strani PEFA;
Calls on the Commission to adopt and apply the new international performance measurement framework in order to assess a country's public financial management, as established by PEFA;
poziva Komisijo, da se odzove skladno in nepristransko, če države ne spoštujejo načel demokracije in človekovih pravic;
Calls on the Commission to react coherently and even-handedly when countries cease to respect the principles of democracy and human rights;
poziva Komisijo, da v skladu s členom 9(3) in 97 Sporazuma o partnerstvu iz Cotonouja oceni razširjenost in tveganje, ki ju predstavlja korupcija;
Calls on the Commission to assess the prevalence and risks posed by corruption, in line with Articles 9(3) and 97 of the Cotonou Partnership Agreement;
poziva Komisijo, da si prizadeva za skladnost med politiko in sprejemanjem odločitev v donatorskih partnerstvih za proračunsko podporo, in zahteva, da se donatorska sredstva upravljajo učinkovito, zato da se preprečijo možnosti za nepredvidljiva nihanja pri dodeljevanju pomoči; meni, da je Komisija najprimernejša za pospeševanje usklajevanja donacij v EU;
Calls upon the Commission to seek coherence in policy and decision-making within donor budget support partnerships and demands that donor funds be administered effectively so as to eliminate the possibility of unpredictable volatility in the granting of aid, and considers that the Commission is best placed to facilitate EU donor coordination;
se mu zdi bistveno, da se izplačilo sredstev in postopek ocenjevanja prilagodita razvojni strategiji, proračunskim postopkom in postopkom ocenjevanja države prejemnice;
Considers it crucial that the disbursement of funds and the evaluation process be aligned with the recipients' own development strategy, budget and evaluation processes;
poziva Komisijo, da se še naprej močno posveča enakosti in zmanjševanju revščine, z osredotočanjem na najbolj obrobne in revne skupine v družbi;
Calls on the Commission to maintain its strong focus on equity and poverty reduction, concentrating on the most marginalised and poor amongst society;
izreka pohvalo uporabi različnih tranš, ki omogočajo na dosežkih temelječe pobude, vendar opozarja, da mora biti vsako neskladje izplačil čim bolj predvidljivo, da ne bi negativno vplivalo na proračunsko načrtovanje;
Commends the use of variable tranches, which offer results-based incentives, but notes that any variance of disbursement should be predictable, as far as possible, so as not to impact negatively on budgetary planning;
je zaskrbljen, ker je težko oceniti uresničevanje kazalnikov uspešnosti in zlasti posledice revščine in poziva Komisijo, naj podpre razvoj zmogljivosti glede statistik, zbiranja podatkov, presoje in analize kakovosti;
Is concerned about the difficulty inherent in assessing the achievement of performance indicators and especially poverty impact results, and calls on the Commission to support capacity development in statistics, data collection, quality assessment and analysis;
poziva Komisijo, da v rednih časovnih razmikih in ob sodelovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi potrdi, da je gospodarska politika v državah prejemnicah v skladu s cilji in načeli razvojne pomoči ter da so njeni pogoji v celoti izpolnjeni;
Calls on the Commission to verify at regular intervals, in collaboration with all stakeholders, that the economic policies of the recipient countries are in accordance with the objectives and principles of the development assistance and that its conditions are being fulfilled;
poziva Komisijo, države članice in države prejemnice, naj redno obveščajo splošno javnost v tem sektorju, zato da evropskim davkoplačevalcem predstavijo učinke proračunske pomoči in da povečajo ozaveščenost ljudi o splošni nujnosti razvojnega sodelovanja, zlasti pa o učinkih proračunske pomoči, da bi preprečila splošne obtožbe o zlorabi sredstev in obveščala o temeljnih zahtevah za uporabo tega instrumenta ter o primerih, v katerih se je ta instrument izkazal kot neučinkovit; od Komisije se zahteva, da izboljša prepoznavnost vloge EU pri razvojni pomoči ter dokumentira in dokaže napredek tretjih držav prejemnic pri odgovornem upravljanju te proračunske pomoči;
Calls on the Commission, Member States and the beneficiary countries to provide regular information to the general public in this sector, in order to make the impact of budget aid visible to the European taxpayer and to raise awareness of the need for development cooperation in general and the effects of budget support in particular, to counter general allegations of misuse of funds and to provide information on the basic requirements for the use of budget support and also on the cases where such support has proven ineffective; urges the Commission to improve the visibility of the EU in development aid and to document and demonstrate the progress made by beneficiary third countries in administering budget aid independently;
poziva Komisijo, naj redno preverja učinkovitost proračunske pomoči pri boju proti revščini glede na stroškovno učinkovitost ter prikaže napredek tretjih držav prejemnic pri upravljanju s proračunsko pomočjo; pri tem mora razlikovati med splošno proračunsko pomočjo in proračunsko pomočjo za posamezne sektorje, s čimer se doseže večja jasnost o učinkovitosti različnih instrumentov za spodbujanje v zvezi z zmanjšanjem revščine; oceniti je treba tudi upravne stroške proračunske in programske pomoči; cilj mora biti doseči možnost utemeljenega odločanja, kdaj naj se uporabi kateri instrument;
Calls on the Commission to assess at regular intervals the effectiveness of budget aid in combating poverty from the point of view of cost-effectiveness, and to show progress made by the third-country beneficiaries in independently administering the budget aid; in doing so, it should distinguish between general and sector-specific budget aid, so as to achieve greater clarity with regard to the effectiveness of the various aid instruments in reducing poverty; the administrative costs of budget and project aid must also be evaluated; the aim should be to be in a position to give a reasoned account of when each instrument should be used;
poziva Komisijo, da mora pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru in spremljanju preprečiti z uvedbo zunanjega nadzora nad proračunsko pomočjo (na primer prek Računskega sodišča); Komisijo je treba spodbuditi, da skupaj z drugimi velikimi donatorji sprejme pobudo za vzpostavitev skupne nadzorne institucije;
Calls on the Commission to tackle the shortcomings in control and supervision by introducing an external control for budget aid (for example via the Court of Auditors); the Commission should be encouraged to take the initiative of setting up a joint supervisory institution together with the other large financial donors;