natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
12. pri uporabi instrumentov nasprotovanja in tožbe zaradi kršitve subsidiarnosti opozarja, da materialnih meril za ugotavljanje kršitev načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ni, ter poudarja, da je treba na ravni EU določiti materialne pogoje za njuno izvajanje;
Points, in the context of the use made of the instruments for raising objections and actions on grounds of subsidiarity, to the lack of material criteria for establishing that there has been a breach of the subsidiarity or proportionality principle, and underlines the need for the material conditions for the application of those principles to be specifically defined at EU level;
Zmanjševanje upravnih bremen in zagotavljanje pravilnega izvajanja
Reducing administrative burdens and ensuring proper implementation
16. ugotavlja, da je skupina na visoki ravni neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravna bremena pozitivno prispevala k programu Komisije za zmanjšanje teh bremen; vendar poudarja, da bi morala biti sestava skupine bolj uravnotežena in vključevati več strokovnjakov iz vrst civilne družbe in drugih držav članic;
Notes the positive contribution made by the High-Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens to the programme to reduce those burdens that is being carried out by the Commission; emphasises, however, that the composition of the group should be better balanced, with the inclusion of more experts representing civil society and experts from other Member States;
19. poziva države članice k doslednem zmanjševanju upravnih bremen in z zadovoljstvom pričakuje stalno konstruktivno sodelovanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti na tem področju;
Calls on the Member States to work consistently to reduce administrative burdens, and looks forward to continued constructive cooperation with national parliaments on this matter;
25. meni, da bi bilo za boljše delovanje evropskega prava treba izboljšati obveščanje o zakonodajnem procesu in zakonodajnih predlogih, saj iz obvestil institucij za podjetja in državljane pogosto ni jasno razvidno, katera zakonodaja je bila na koncu sprejeta;
Considers that, in order for European legislation to function better, communication about the legislative process and legislative proposals should be improved, because the reports emanating from the institutions often make it unclear to businesses and the public exactly what legislation has ultimately been adopted;
30. poziva zlasti Komisijo, naj v javna posvetovanja in objavo njihovih rezultatov učinkovito vključi večjezičnost, saj je to pogoj za široko udeležbo vseh zainteresiranih strani v Evropi;
In particular, calls on the Commission to effectively mainstream multilingualism in the running and publication of the results of public consultations, as a prerequisite for extensive involvement of all the European stakeholders;
33. poudarja, kako pomembno je, da so analize, ki jih Komisija opravi z ocenami učinka, neodvisne in verodostojne, da se zavarujejo osnovni cilji iz načrta za pametno pravno ureditev; ponavlja svoje stališče o tem vprašanju iz resolucije z dne 8. junija 2011;
Underlines the importance of guaranteeing the independence and credibility of the analyses carried out in the Commission’s impact assessments so as to secure the overall goals of the smart regulation agenda, and reiterates Parliament’s position on the issue as set out in its resolution of 8 June 2011;
38. v tej zvezi meni, da ima ključno vlogo test MSP, sprejet z zakonom o malih podjetjih, in pričakuje, da ga bo Komisija v celoti uporabljala; poudarja, da mora Komisija zagotoviti usklajeno izvajanje testa MSP v vseh direktoratih Komisije, države članice pa spodbuja, naj podobne teste vključijo v svoje nacionalne postopke odločanja; poziva vse parlamentarne odbore, naj načela testa MSP uporabijo pri zakonodajnih poročilih, o katerih je pristojni odbor že glasoval in ki bodo predloženi v odobritev na plenarnem zasedanju;
Takes the view in this regard that the SME test adopted in the Small Business Act has a key role to play, and expects the Commission to make full use of the test; stresses the need for the Commission to ensure consistent application of the SME test across Directorates within the Commission, and encourages the Member States to include similar considerations in their national decision-making processes; calls on all the parliamentary committees to apply the principles of the SME test to legislative reports when they have been voted on by the relevant committee and are being submitted to plenary for approval;
Poenostavitev in naknadno vrednotenje
Simplification and ex-post evaluation
41. poziva Komisijo, naj gradi na uspešnih programih boljše priprave zakonodaje in upravne poenostavitve v državah članicah, vključno s široko uporabo elektronskih postopkov;
Calls on the Commission to build on the successful programmes of better lawmaking and of administrative simplification in the Member States, including the extensive use of electronic procedures;
46. poziva Komisijo, naj zlasti pregleda vse uredbe o financiranju, da bi se zmanjšala upravna obremenitev za prosilce subvencij EU in da bi bil celoten postopek za vložitev zahtevkov učinkovitejši;
Asks the Commission to review, in particular, all the funding regulations in order to reduce the administrative burden for applicants for EU subsidies with a view to making the whole application procedure more efficient;
Politična spodbuda in stalna pazljivost
Ensuring leadership and continued vigilance
49. se obvezuje, da bo pozorno spremljal, kako bo Komisija izvajala načrt za pametno pravno ureditev, in pozdravlja poročilo o napredku, načrtovano za drugo polovico leta 2012;
Undertakes to remain vigilant in monitoring the Commission’s implementation of the smart regulation agenda, and looks forward to the progress report scheduled for the second half of 2012;
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe 1. decembra 2009 so nacionalni parlamenti pridobili večjo vlogo pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja načela subsidiarnosti.
With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on 1 December 2009, National parliaments play a bigger role in ensuring respect for the principle of subsidiarity.
Medtem ko je Parlament prejel že precej prispevkov in utemeljenih mnenj, pa dejanska praktična izvedba te novosti, zlasti področje uporabe in vsebina prispevkov, še ni povsem dorečena.
While a considerable number of contributions and reasoned opinions have been received so far, the exact modalities of this innovation, in particular the scope and content of the contributions, are still being worked out and calibrated.
Ker se sporočilo Komisije o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti nanaša na leto 2009, je novost iz Lizbonske pogodbe v referenčnem obdobju učinkovala zgolj en mesec.
Whereas the Commission’s communication on subsidiarity and proportionality covers the year 2009, this innovation in the Lisbon Treaty was thus only in effect for one month of the relevant period.
Parlament je do zdaj prejel več kot 300 prispevkov nacionalnih parlamentov in bilo bi prav, da se ob tej priložnosti izreče, ali so sistemi, ki jih je vzpostavil za obravnavanje te novosti, učinkoviti, opredeli pomanjkljivosti ter predlaga izboljšanja.
Parliament has however thus far received over 300 submissions from national parliaments and it would be proper for it to take this opportunity to pronounce itself on the effective functioning of the systems put in place inside Parliament to accommodate this innovation and to identify any shortcomings and suggest improvements.
Malo verjetno je, da bo zastavljeni cilj o 25-odstotnem zmanjšanju upravnih bremen do leta 2012 izpolnjen brez večje angažiranosti in ukrepanja.
It seems very unlikely that the target of the programme to reduce administrative burdens, 25 % by 2012, will be attained without increased commitment and action.
Že sprejete ukrepe je torej treba okrepiti ter biti bolj ambiciozen.
Measures already taken must therefore be strengthened and the level of ambition redoubled.
Vse udeležene zainteresirane strani si morajo še bolj prizadevati, da bi cilj 25 odstotkov izpolnile in stroške predpisov zmanjšale še v tem mandatu Komisije, vsekakor pa po letu 2014.
All stakeholders involved must step up their game, not only to reach the 25 % goal, but to reduce regulatory costs further over the course of this Commission and indeed beyond 2014.
Glavni vprašanji, ki ju je treba obravnavati, so razlike v razlagi in pretirana natančnost zakonodaje („ gold-plating “); predvsem ju morajo obravnavati države članice same pri izvajanju in prenosu zakonodaje v nacionalno pravo, pa tudi Komisija kot varuhinja Pogodb.
Discrepancies in interpretation and the ‘gold-plating’ of legislation are major issues that need to be addressed, primarily by Member States themselves in implementing and transposing legislation into national law but also by the Commission in its role as guardian of the treaties.
Države članice bi torej morale biti dolžne utemeljevati, zakaj v domačo zakonodajo uvajajo zahteve, ki presegajo standarde iz zakonodaje EU.
Member States should therefore be required to justify their decision to introduce higher requirements in their domestic legislation beyond the standards set in the EU legislation being implemented.
Formuliranje politike
Policy formulation
Predlogi za zakonodajo EU bi morali nastati po temeljiti pripravljalni fazi, v kateri bi morala Komisija obvezno predstaviti belo knjigo, izvesti obširna posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi ter pripraviti ocene učinka.
Proposals for EU legislation should be preceded by a thorough preparatory phase, where the presentation by the Commission of a white paper and the conduction of comprehensive and inclusive consultations and impact assessments should be made mandatory.
Vedno je treba obravnavati učinke za mala in srednja podjetja, saj imajo zakonodajne zahteve zanje večje posledice kot za večje družbe.
The effects for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) must always be considered as they are more overwhelmed by regulatory requirements than larger corporations.
Ponovno je treba poudariti, da morajo prenos direktiv v državah članicah spremljati korelacijske razpredelnice, Parlament pa bi moral biti inovativen pri snovanju pobud, da se korelacijska tabela pripravi za vsak zakonodajni predpis.
The necessity of correlation tables accompanying the transposition of directives by Member States must once again be reiterated and Parliament should be innovative in coming up with incentives to make this happen for every single piece of legislation.
Program Komisije za poenostavitev bi se moral bolj osredotočiti na tehniko prenovitve, zagotoviti pa je treba tudi stalno ocenjevanje veljavne zakonodaje, da se sproti ugotavlja, ali jo je treba poenostaviti in v nekaterih primerih morda celo odpraviti.
The Commission’s simplification programme should have a stronger focus on the recasting technique, and it is important to ensure that existing legislation is continually evaluated in order to ascertain whether it should be simplified or, as the case may be, abolished.
Za konkretno izvajanje načrta za pametno pravno ureditev je potrebna resnična politična spodbuda vseh institucij in držav članic, čeprav ima osrednjo vlogo pri ohranjanju te teme visoko na političnem dnevnem redu Komisija.
Real political leadership is required from all institutions and the Member States in order to strengthen the smart regulation agenda, but the Commission plays a key role in maintaining this issue high on the political agenda.
Zato bi se moral z zadevo kot osrednjo nalogo ukvarjati eden od komisarjev.
A Commissioner should therefore be entrusted with this issue as the main part of his or her portfolio.
A tudi Parlament bi moral razmisliti, kako naj se še bolj obveže pripravi pametne pravne ureditve, na primer s pripravo sej, na katerih bi sodelovali različni odbori.
Parliament should at the same time investigate methods to increase its commitment to smart regulation, for instance by making use of inter-committee meetings.
Komisija bo poročilo o napredku načrta za pametno pravno ureditev predstavila v drugi polovici 2012.
The Commission will present a progress report on the smart regulation agenda in the second half of 2012.
5. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zmanjšajo upravne stroške in obremenitve malih in srednjih podjetij ter jim olajšajo dostop do posojil in trga storitev;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to reduce the administrative and bureaucratic burden on SMEs and to afford them easier access to credit and the services market;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj bolj spodbuja dialog in komunikacijo s civilno družbo v obliki javnih posvetovanj ter to obliko komunikacije kar najbolj prilagodi potrebam državljanov;
Calls on the Commission to give greater support to dialogue and communication with civil society in the form of public consultations and urges it to adapt this form of communication as much as possible to the needs of the ordinary citizen;
9. poudarja, da je odprt, pregleden in reden dialog osnovni pogoj za večje sodelovanje civilne družbe pri pripravi zakonodaje in javnem upravljanju;
Stresses that open, transparent and regular dialogue is a basic precondition for greater involvement of civil society in the process of shaping legislation and governance;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno vpliva na pravočasno delo odbora za oceno učinka in izboljša količinsko opredeljenost stroškov izvajanja in uveljavitve ter potencialne upravne obremenitve predlagane zakonodaje, kot je to v svojem posebne poročilu o ocenah učinka predlagalo Evropsko računsko sodišče
Calls on the Commission to further improve the timeliness of the Impact Assessment Board, the quantification of implementation and enforcement costs and the potential administrative burden of proposed legislation, as suggested by the European Court of Auditors in its Special Report on Impact Assessments
Ocene učinka v institucijah EU: ali pomagajo pri odločanju?
Impact assessments in the EU Institutions: do they support decision-making?
14. spodbuja sprejetje predloga Računskega sodišča, ki določa, da bi nacionalne ocene učinka lahko koristno dopolnjevale ocene učinka, ki jih izvaja Komisija; poziva k poenostavitvi zakonodaje in kar največjemu zmanjšanju upravnih obremenitev, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, izmenjavo najboljših praks med državami članicami ter njihove skupne ukrepe za zmanjšanje pretirane natančnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU;
Encourages the adoption of the proposal made by the Court of Auditors stipulating that national impact assessments could usefully complement those carried out by the Commission; calls for the simplification of legislation and minimisation of administrative burdens, particularly for SMEs, for the exchange of best practices between Member States, and for collective action to be taken by Member States to reduce ‘gold plating’ of EU legislation;
17. poziva Komisijo, naj zlasti pregleda vse uredbe o financiranju, da bi se zmanjšala upravna obremenitev za prosilce subvencij EU in da bi bil celoten postopek za vložitev zahtevkov učinkovitejši.
Requests the Commission to review, in particular, all the funding regulations in order to reduce the administrative burden for applicants for EU subsidies with a view to making the whole application procedure more efficient;
20. ob sklicevanju na Montijevo poročilo odločno poudarja, da bi bilo treba pri zakonodajnih predlogih v večji meri uporabljati uredbe, da bi tako sprejemali manj zakonodaje, ki pa bi bila boljša;
Stresses that, pursuing the same approach as was adopted in the Monti report, greater use should be made of regulations in legislative proposals, as part of the move towards less and better legislation;
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Sandra Kalniete, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Catherine Stihler, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Regina Bastos, Cornelis de Jong, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Morten Løkkegaard, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis)
Regina Bastos, Cornelis de Jong, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Morten Løkkegaard, Konstantinos Poupakis
Pripravljavec mnenja: Morten Messerschmidt
Rapporteur: Morten Messerschmidt
2. poudarja, da morajo evropske institucije pri oblikovanju predlogov upoštevati načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter upoštevati merila iz Protokola št. 2 k PDEU;
Emphasises that European institutions must comply with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality when formulating proposals and observe the criteria laid down in Protocol No 2 to the TFEU;
6. v okviru uporabe instrumentov pritožbe in tožbe zaradi kršitve subsidiarnosti opozarja, da ni materialnih meril za ugotavljanje kršitev načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ter poudarja, da je treba na ravni EU določiti materialne pogoje za izvajanje teh načel;
Points, in the context of the use made of the instruments for raising objections and actions on grounds of subsidiarity, to the lack of material criteria for establishing that there has been a breach of the subsidiarity or proportionality principle, and underlines the need for the material conditions for the application of those principles to be specifically defined at EU level;
8. v zvezi s tem poudarja, da morajo nacionalni parlamenti pri predlaganju mnenj, kolikor je le mogoče, razlikovati med vidikoma subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti;
Highlights, in this context, the need for the national parliaments, when submitting an opinion, to distinguish between the aspects of subsidiarity and proportionality as far as possible;
Pametna pravna ureditev
Smart regulation
20. opozarja, da mora Komisija državljansko pobudo, ki jo uvaja Lizbonska pogodba, obravnavati kot pomemben element participativne demokracije, saj odpira novo pot do zakonodaje;
Points out that the Commission must regard the citizens’ initiative introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon as an important element of participatory democracy, since it opens a new pathway to legislation;
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi določenih zastarelih aktov Sveta s področja skupne kmetijske politike
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on repealing certain obsolete Council acts in the field of the common agricultural policy
(Poenostavljeni postopek - člen 46(2) poslovnika)
(Simplified procedure – Rule 46(2) of the Rules of Procedure)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0764 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0764 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) ter prvega pododstavka člena 42 in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0006/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 42, first subparagraph and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0006/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 55 in člena 46(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 55 and 46(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7–0252/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0252/2011 ),
o razveljavitvi določenih zastarelih aktov Sveta s področja skupne kmetijske politike
on repealing certain obsolete Council acts in the field of the common agricultural policy
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, prvega pododstavka člena 42 in člena 43(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, first subparagraph of Article 42 and Article 43(2) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu iz leta 1979 ter zlasti členov 60, točke 5 člena 61 in člena 72(1) Akta,
Having regard to the 1979 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 60, Article 61(5) and Article 72(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pristopu Španije in Portugalske ter zlasti člena 234(3) Akta,
Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular Article 234(3) thereof,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske Komisije,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom in zahtevo po soglasju v Svetu iz člena 234(3) Akta o pristopu Španije in Portugalske
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and the requirement for unanimity in the Council provided for in Article 234(3) of the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne … (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in sklep Sveta z dne... ,
Position of the European Parliament of … (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of…. ,
(1) Izboljšanje preglednosti prava Unije je bistveni del strategije za boljše oblikovanje pravnih aktov, ki jo izvajajo institucije Unije.
(1) Improving the transparency of Union law is an essential element of the better lawmaking strategy that Union institutions are implementing.
Zato je primerno iz veljavne zakonodaje umakniti tiste akte, ki nimajo več nobenega pravega učinka.
In that context it is appropriate to remove from active legislation those acts which no longer have real effect.
(2) Številne uredbe, povezane s skupno kmetijsko politiko, so zastarele, vendar formalno še vedno veljajo.
(2) A number of Regulations relating to the Common Agricultural Policy have become obsolete, even though formally they are still in force.
(2a) Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2052/69 z dne 17. oktobra 1969 o financiranju izdatkov za izvajanje Konvencije o pomoči v hrani s strani Skupnosti
(2a) Regulation (EEC) No 2052/69 of the Council of 17 October 1969 on the Community financing of expenditure arising from the implementation of the Food Aid Convention
UL L 263, 21.10.1969, str.
OJ L 263, 21.10.1969, p.
6. ▌je postala brezpredmetna, saj so njeno vsebino povzeli poznejši akti.
6. ▌ has exhausted its effects since its content has been taken up by successive acts.
(2b) Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 1467/70 z dne 20. julija 1970 o določitvi nekaterih splošnih pravil za intervencije na trgu surovega tobaka
(2b) Regulation (EEC) No 1467/70 of the Council of 20 July 1970 fixing certain general rules governing intervention on the market in raw tobacco
UL L 164, 27.7.1970, str.
OJ L 164, 27.7.1970, p.
32. ▌je postala brezpredmetna zaradi poznejših reform sektorja tobaka po letu 1992 .
32. ▌ has exhausted its effects as a result of successive reforms of the tobacco sector since 1992 .
(2c) Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 3279/75 z dne 16. decembra 1975 o poenotenju režimov, ki jih uporabljajo posamezne države članice za uvoz živih dreves in drugih rastlin, čebulic, korenin in podobnega, rezanega cvetja in okrasnega listja iz držav nečlanic
(2c) Regulation (EEC) No 3279/75 of the Council of 16 December 1975 on the standardization of the treatment applied by the individual Member States to imports from non-member countries of live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage
UL L 326, 18.12.1975, str.
OJ L 326, 18.12.1975, p.
1. ▌je postala brezpredmetna, saj so njeno vsebino povzeli poznejši akti.
1. ▌ has exhausted its effects since its content has been taken up by successive acts.