natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, da igra aktivnejšo vlogo glede obstoječih sistemov kontrole izdatkov za Turčijo, Hrvaško, Srbijo, Nekdanjo jugoslovanska republika Makedonijo in druge države zahodnega Balkana med pristopnim obdobjem, in zahteva, da Parlamentu, v okviru svojih poročil o napredku o teh državah, posreduje podrobnejše informacije o tej zadevi, zlasti podrobno analizo razlogov za neuspeh; poziva Komisijo, da v poročilo o napredku uvede sistem semaforjev (zelena, rumena in rdeča luč), prek katerega bo označevala napredek na poti k doseganju različnih osrednjih ciljev;
Calls on the Commission to play a more active role in connection with the expenditure control systems existing in Turkey, Croatia, Serbia, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and the other Western Balkan countries during the pre-accession stage, and requests it to provide Parliament, in its report on the progress of those countries, with more detailed information on this issue, including a detailed analysis of the reasons for any failings; calls on the Commission to introduce in the progress reports a system of traffic lights (green, amber and red lights) to denote the progress made towards achieving the various key objectives;
obžaluje ugotovljene primere goljufij in nepravilnega upravljanja evropskih sredstev, ki so jih upravljali Združeni narodi, glede sredstev Unije, namenjenih za obnovo Kosova, in pomanjkanje spremljanja teh jasno identificiranih primerov s strani Združenih narodov; vendar želi izraziti tudi hvaležnost Evropski agenciji za obnovo in njenemu "evropskemu" ter lokalnemu osebju za delo, ki so ga opravili za ljudi v včasih težkih razmerah;
Deplores the cases of fraud and mismanagement of European funds administered by the United Nations identified in connection with EU funding of reconstruction work in Kosovo and the lack of follow-up by the United Nations of these clearly identified cases; wishes, however, also to express its gratitude to the European Agency for Reconstruction and its "European" and local staff for the work done for the people of Kosovo in sometimes difficult circumstances;
poziva Računsko sodišče, da pripravi posebno poročilo o učinkovitosti sistema, ki ga je vzpostavila Komisija za kontrolo evropskih sredstev, ki jih je prejelo Kosovo, in o uspešnosti sistema glede preprečevanja goljufij, in da preveri, ali je bilo financiranje v skladu s pogoji, predvideni v sporazumih o zadevnih programih, vključno s pravili za instrument za predpristopno pomoč Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1085/2006 z dne 17. julija 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Calls on the ECA to produce a special report on the effectiveness of the systems put in place by the Commission to control the European funds received by Kosovo and of those systems' performance as regard fraud prevention, and to check whether the conditions laid down in the agreements on the relevant programmes, as well as the rules laid down under the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance Council Regulation (EC) No 1085/2006 of 17 July 2006 establishing an Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
ter Uredbe (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002;
and Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, have been fully applied to such funding;
predlaga, da Komisija zahteva, da kosovska vlada predloži potrdilo o reviziji s strani svojega računskega sodišča glede evropskih sredstev, zlasti za tista, ki so vpisana v proračun;
Proposes that the Commission ask the Kosovo Government to supply an audit certificate in respect of European funds, in particular those included in the budget, from the country's audit authorities;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da revizija Računskega sodišča ni pokazala nobenih resnih napak, ki bi škodile zakonitosti in pravilnosti upravnih odhodkov;
Notes with satisfaction that the ECA's audits brought to light no material errors affecting the legality and regularity of administrative expenditure;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija zagotovila, da se vladi Belgije in Združenega kraljestva zavežeta za izpolnjevanje svojih obveznosti v obstoječih medvladnih sporazumih – za Belgijo čim hitrejšo razpoložljivost za četrto oziroma peto evropsko šolo, za Združeno kraljestvo zadostno dodeljevanje učiteljev – in pričakuje revizijo veljavne politike vpisa za šole Berkendael/Laeken, da se prepreči dolg in nesprejemljiv čas potovanja otrok;
Expects the Commission to ensure that the Belgian and United Kingdom governments commit to meeting their obligations under the existing inter-governmental agreements - for Belgium the earliest possible provision of a fourth or even a fifth European school, for the UK the secondment of a sufficient number of teachers - and expects the current enrolment policy regarding the Berkendael/Laeken schools to be revised in order to avoid long and unacceptable travelling times for children;
izraža razočaranje zaradi nezadostnih informacij, ki jih je predložila Komisija leta 2005 in 2006 na tem področju, ki je izredno pomembno z vidika proračuna; priznava prizadevanja v vmesnem času glede preglednosti na spletni strani Komisije in glede letnega poročila o oceni osebja;
Voices its disappointment at the inadequate information forwarded by the Commission in 2005 and 2006 in this area, which is extremely important from a budgetary point of view; acknowledges the efforts made in the meantime as regards transparency on the Commission website and the annual staff screening report;
izraža zaskrbljenost glede dejstva, da skoraj 32 % uslužbencev Komisije dela na področju oddelka za podporo upravi in usklajevanja; opozarja, da številka 10 % osebja, ki dela na področju proračuna, še ni vključena v to statistiko; poziva Komisijo, da iz teh številk oblikuje primerne sklepe in da ponovno organizira svoje človeške vire, da se delež osebja, ki dela na tem področju, zmanjša na 20%;
Voices concern at the fact that close to 32% of the Commission's staff work in administrative support and coordination; points out that that figure does not include the 10% of staff who work in the budget area; calls on the Commission to draw appropriate conclusions from these figures and to reorganise its human resources in order to reduce the proportion of staff working in these areas to 20%;
ugotavlja, da je bila mobilnost osebja prvotno mišljena samo za občutljiva delovna mesta; izraža presenečenje nad trenutno prakso Komisije, da uporablja pravilo mobilnosti za vse člane osebja po petih letih, oziroma najkasneje sedmih letih; se boji, da bo ta način izvajanja pravila mobilnosti zmanjšal učinkovitost Komisije in preprečil, da se potrebne izkušnje in znanje kopičita znotraj Komisije; poziva Komisijo, da ga obvešča o tem, na kakšen način se mobilnost lahko omeji samo na občutljiva delovna mesta;
Notes that staff mobility was originally intended to cover sensitive posts alone; expresses surprise at the Commission's current practice of applying the mobility rule to all staff members after five years or, at the most, seven years; fears that this way of applying the mobility rule could undermine efficiency within the Commission and prevent the necessary experience and know-how from being built up within that institution; calls on the Commission to inform it how mobility might be confined to sensitive posts;
Vprašanja v zvezi s stavbami Skupnosti
Matters relating to the Community's buildings
obžaluje pomanjkanje preglednosti Komisije pri upravljanju svojih 61 stavb v Bruslju in glede razvoja na področju stavbnega fonda;
Deplores the lack of transparency shown by the Commission in the management of its 61 buildings in Brussels and as regards developments concerning its buildings stock;
poziva Komisijo, da Parlament obvešča o vseh novih projektih, ki zadevajo njegov stavbeni fond, in to pred sprejetjem teh projektov, in da redno obvešča Odbor za proračunski nadzor o vseh pobudah in novih sklepih glede nepremičninskih projektov, vključno s pripravljalnimi deli in javnimi razpisi za katere je predlagano oblikovanje odbora za javne razpise, v kateri bodo zastopani predstavniki Parlamenta;
Calls on the Commission to inform it of all new projects concerning its buildings stock prior to their adoption, and to notify its Committee on Budgetary Control of all initiatives and new decisions concerning property projects, including preparatory work and invitations to tender, in respect of which it is proposed that a tender committee should be established, which would include representatives from Parliament;
poziva OLAF, da ga obvešča o vseh primerih goljufije, ki se pojavijo na področju nepremičninske politike, in da poišče morebitne konflikte interesov;
Calls on OLAF to notify it of any cases of fraud brought to light in the property policy field and to look into possible conflicts of interest;
poziva Komisijo, da izvede revizijo upravljanja njej lastnih stavb in stavb drugih institucij Evropske skupnosti, ter da poišče idejo o skupni strukturi za upravljanje z nepremičninami;
Calls on the Commission to conduct an audit of both its own buildings and the buildings of all the other Community institutions, and to look into the idea of a common property management structure;
obžaluje dejstvo, da v zaključnih računih Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2007 UL C 287, 10.11.2008, str.
Deplores the fact that, in the annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2007 OJ C 287, 10.11.2008, p.
, Komisija ni v celoti ponovila določb iz Pogodbe ES o spremljevalnih ukrepih v luči razrešnice, in da je omenila samo, da Parlament pri podeljevanju razrešnice lahko poudari pripombe, ki se mu zdijo pomembne, in pogosto priporoči ukrepe, ki bi jih morala Komisija sprejeti glede teh zadev; ugotavlja, da je ta pripomba umestna, vendar Komisija vedno pozabi omeniti, da se v členu 276 Pogodbe ES zahteva, da tudi Komisija sprejme vse primerne korake za odziv na pripombe v sklepih Parlamenta o podelitvi razrešnice glede izvrševanja odhodkov; zato opozarja Komisijo, da pozivi iz njegove resolucije o razrešnici niso samo nezavezujoča priporočila, ampak navodila, ki jih mora Komisija upoštevati pri izvajanju proračuna;
, the Commission fails to repeat in full the provisions of the EC Treaty on follow-up measures in the light of the discharge, stating merely that when granting discharge Parliament may highlight observations it considers important, often recommending actions that the Commission should take concerning these matters; notes that, although this is correct, the Commission fails to mention that Article 276 of the EC Treaty also requires the Commission to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations in Parliament's decisions giving discharge relating to the execution of expenditure; reminds the Commission, therefore, that the calls made in its discharge resolution are not simply non-binding recommendations, but instructions which the Commission must act on when implementing the budget;
Del I: Posebno poročilo št. 6/2007 o uspešnosti tehnične pomoči pri razvoju zmogljivosti
Part I: Special Report No 6/2007 on the effectiveness of technical assistance in the context of capacity development
meni, da tehnična pomoč in druge vrste zunanje pomoči, ki so še vedno predvsem odvisne od pobud donatorjev ter pogosto nezadostne in netrajnostne, nujno potrebujejo prenovo, med drugim s spodbujanjem lokalnega lastništva, učinkovitejšim usklajevanjem virov med državami članicami na ravni Unije in mednarodni ravni ter z zagotavljanjem zadostnega časa za izvajanje projektov;
Considers that technical assistance (TA) and other types of external aid, which is still too donor-driven, often inefficient and unsustainable, urgently needs to be reformed by, among other things, promoting local ownership, more effectively coordinating the resources between Member States at Union and international level, and ensuring that there is sufficient time to implement projects;
je v zvezi s tem seznanjen, da so službe Komisije julija 2008 odobrile okvirno strategijo in delovni načrt za uresničitev ciljev učinkovitosti pomoči za tehnično sodelovanje in enote za izvajanje projektov; zato poziva Komisijo, naj prvič obvesti Parlament o izvajanju te strategije pred koncem marca 2009, po tem pa vsakih šest mesecev;
Notes in this context the approval by the Commission's services in July 2008 of the Backbone Strategy and the Work Plan to meet aid effectiveness targets on Technical Cooperation and Project Implementation Units; calls therefore on the Commission to inform Parliament about the implementation of this strategy for the first time before the end of March 2009, and thereafter at six-monthly intervals;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija Računskemu sodišču poslala informacije o zneskih, porabljenih za tehnično pomoč, prepozno, šele po objavi posebnega poročila Sodišča; je presenečen, da te informacije niso bile dane na razpolago med pripravo posebnega poročila; priznava, da je opredelitev odbora za razvojno pomoč Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj, široka in v praksi vodi do razlik v razlagi; pričakuje, da bo strategija, ki jo je sprejela Komisija, prav tako vodila k bolj operativni opredelitvi tehnične pomoči;
Notes the belated information on the amounts spent on TA recently provided by the Commission to the ECA following publication of the ECA's special report; is surprised that this information was not made available during the preparation of the special report; acknowledges that the definition employed by the OECD's Development Aid Committee is broad and in practice leads to differences in interpretation; hopes that the strategy adopted by the Commission will also lead to a more operational definition of TA;
obžaluje, da Komisija zelo poredko uporabi klavzulo o odložitvi, ki omogoča pospešen postopek javnega naročila; zahteva, da Komisija ta instrument uporabi premišljeno, da se izboljša časovni razpored izvajanja operacij tehnične pomoči;
Deplores the fact that the suspension clause, allowing an accelerated procurement procedure, is barely used by the Commission; requests the Commission to use this facility wisely in order to improve the timetable for the implementation of TA operations;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da nekatere družbe namerno predlagajo strokovnjake z zanimivim življenjepisom, da bi pridobile naročilo, čeprav točno vedo, da strokovnjak ne bo na voljo za izvedbo naloge; se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da so izbirna merila, ki jih uporablja Komisija za tehnično pomoč, neprimerna;
Finds it unacceptable that some companies deliberately propose experts with good CVs in order to win a contract while knowing that the expert in question will not be available to take up the assignment; agrees with the ECA that the selection criteria for TA used by the Commission are inappropriate;
zato poziva Komisijo, da veliko bolj upošteva druga merila (kot so tista, ki jih predlaga Računsko sodišče), ne pa samo življenjepisa vodje skupine; predlaga, da se to na primer lahko stori z vzpostavitvijo zbirke podatkov, skladne s pravnimi zahtevami, ki vsebuje podjetja, ki ne zagotovijo predlaganih strokovnjakov, kar bi jim tako preprečilo, da sodelujejo pri javnih naročilih za določeno obdobje; ugotavlja, da je Komisija sprejela Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 1302/2008 z dne 17. decembra 2008 o centralni podatkovni zbirki o izključitvah UL L 344, 20.12.2008, str.
Requests therefore that the Commission take much greater account of other criteria (such as those proposed by the ECA), rather than solely considering the CV of the team leader expert; suggests that this could be done, for example, by creating a database, compatible with legal requirements, of firms which fail to provide the proposed expert, which should in turn prevent them from participating in procurement for a specified period; notes that the Commission has adopted Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1302/2008 of 17 December 2008 on the central exclusion database OJ L 344, 20.12.2008, p.
in Sklep št. 2008/969/ES, Euratom z dne 16. decembra 2008 o sistemu zgodnjega opozarjanja za odredbodajalce Komisije in izvajalske agencije UL L 344, 20.12.2008, str.
and Decision 2008/969/EC, Euratom of 16 December 2008 on the Early Warning System for the use of authorising officers of the Commission and the executive agencies OJ L 344, 20.12.2008, p.
, vendar pa ta nova instrumenta ne omogočata izključitve podjetij na tej podlagi; nadalje ugotavlja, da so ti vidiki del delovnega načrta (os 3, ukrepi 13 do 15), in poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma uporabi s tem povezane ukrepe;
, but that these new instruments do not make it possible to exclude firms on this basis; further notes that these aspects are part of the Work Plan (Axis 3, Actions 13-15), and calls on the Commission to apply the related actions immediately;
soglaša z Računskim sodiščem, da je pri pristopu Komisije v zvezi z uporabo sistemov partnerskih držav za upravljanje javnih financ in javnih naročil mogoče opaziti nedoslednost, kar je včasih popolnoma v nasprotju z zavezami, ki jih je sprejela Unija v okviru Pariške izjave o učinkovitosti pomoči, potrjene 2. marca 2005 Zaključena in sprejeta na forumu na visoki ravni 2. marca 2005 v Parizu s strani držav v razvoju in držav donatork, med njimi s strani Evropske unije, Afriške razvojne banke, Azijske razvojne banke, Evropske banke za obnovo in razvoj, Medameriške razvojne banke, odbora OECD za razvojno pomoč, Združenih narodov in Svetovne banke.
Agrees with the ECA that there is incoherence in the Commission's approach regarding the use of partner countries' public financial management and procurement systems, which stands, sometimes, in direct contradiction to the Union's commitments in the context of the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness endorsed on 2 March 2005 Agreed and adopted at the High Level Forum on 2 March 2005 in Paris by developing and donor countries, the EU, the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Development Assistance Committee of the OECD, the United Nations and the World Bank.
; zato poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi hitro spoštovanje teh zavez na podlagi strateškega dialoga, predvidenega v okviru poteka dela v Akri in po Akri, ter ukrepov iz delovnega načrta (os 1, zlasti ukrep 20);
; urges the Commission therefore to ensure the quick implementation of these commitments on the basis of the strategic dialogue provided for in the framework of the Accra and post-Accra work stream and the Work Plan actions (Axis 1, in particular Action 20);
poziva Komisijo, naj deluje čim bolj v skladu s pobudami o preglednosti in upošteva resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti pri finančnih zadevah Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0051 .
Calls on the Commission, as far as possible, to act in a manner consistent with its transparency initiatives and to take into account Parliament's resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0051 .
, ter priporoča, da se vzpostavi zbirka podatkov, ki bi zagotavljala pregled nalog tehnične pomoči in rezultatov, ki se lahko uporabijo za prihodnje misije tehnične pomoči, in da se prepreči podvajanja;
, and recommends that a database be set up providing an overview of TA missions and results which can be used for future TA tasks and to prevent duplications;
Del II: Posebno poročilo št. 1/2008 o procesu obravnavanja vlog in vrednotenja v zvezi z velikimi naložbenimi projekti iz programskih obdobij 1994–1999 in 2000–2006
Part II: Special Report No 1/2008 concerning the procedures for the preliminary examination and evaluation of major investment projects for the 1994-1999 and 2000-2006 programming periods
poziva Komisijo, da ohrani svoj strogi postopek za odobritev velikih projektov, vendar priporoča, da racionalizira svoje sprejemanje odločitev tako, da bo imelo realno vrednost, ter se tako izogne obravnavanju postopka kot pretirano "upravnega postopka", zmanjša dolžino postopka za sprejemanje odločitev znotraj razumnih meja, in, kolikor je mogoče hitro, vpelje neodvisne enote za velike projekte s horizontalno pristojnostjo znotraj Generalnega direktorata za regionalno politiko(GD REGIO); želi pritegniti pozornost Komisije k dejstvu, da že subvencionira naložbe v programsko opremo, kar bo omogočilo, da bo sistem postal preglednejši in ga bo lažje kontrolirati, istočasno pa ne sme zanemariti preglede na kraju samem;
Calls on the Commission to review the strict approval procedure for major projects, but recommends that it rationalise decision-making by indicating real values, thereby avoiding treating the procedure as an excessively "administrative procedure", reducing the length of the decision-making process to a reasonable duration, and establishing, as soon as possible, an independent unit for major projects with horizontal competence within the Directorate-General for Regional Policy (DG REGIO); points out the importance of funding investment in software, as this will make the system more transparent and easier to control; at the same time, the Commission must not reduce the number of on-the-spot checks as a result of this investment;
poziva Komisijo, da predloži celovite informacije o praktični uporabi pravil n+2 in n+3 za velike projekte, saj so se nekatere države članice poskušale izogniti pravilom Evropskega sklada za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) (zlasti pravilu n+2) s tem, da so združile nekatere projekte tako, da je bila skupna številka zanje ravno pod mejno vrednostjo za velike projekte, in so nato čakale, da bo Komisija sklenila, da se pravilo n+2 začasno preneha uporabljati za zadevni primer;
Calls on the Commission to report on the practical application of the n+2 and n+3 rules for major projects, since some Member States have tried to "circumvent" the ERDF rules (more specifically, the n+2 rule) by merging a number of projects such that the total figure for these fell just short of the threshold values for major projects and then waiting for the Commission decision to suspend the n+2 rule;
poudarja vprašanje, in išče odgovor nanj, o tem, kako se je lahko pojavila tveganju naklonjena kultura (z visoko kakovostjo, inovativnimi naložbami, ki izgubljajo odličnost), praksa, ki je popolnoma v nasprotju s prizadevanji Skupnosti, kot je zapisano v lizbonski agendi; meni, da težava ni v financiranju naložb v infrastrukturo, ampak v dejstvu, da imajo države članice možnost, da se izognejo inovativnim "tveganim" naložbam;
Points out – and seeks an answer to – the question of how the "risk-averse" culture might have come about (with high-quality, innovative investments losing prominence), a practice which runs completely counter to the Community's efforts as laid down in the Lisbon Strategy; considers that the problem lies not with funding infrastructure investments but with the fact that Member States have the opportunity to avoid innovative – "risky" – investments;
meni, da je obžalovanja vredno, da Komisija (GD REGIO) ne financira izobraževanja in usposabljanja za svoje lastno osebje, ampak zunanjo skupino (JASPERS), ki sodi v strukturo Evropske investicijske banke, in torej ne odgovarja Komisiji za svoje delo; opozarja države članice, da če ne bodo zagotavljale izobraževanja in razvoja za svoje skupine strokovnjakov, bodo odvisne od skupin tujih, zunanjih strokovnjakov, kar bo povzročilo znatne posredne stroške za zadevno državo;
Considers it regrettable that the Commission is funding education and training not for its own staff (DG REGIO) but for a separate group (JASPERS), which is located within the structure of the European Investment Bank and is therefore not accountable to the Commission for its work; points out to Member States that, if they fail to provide training and development for their pools of experts, they will be dependent on groups of foreign, external experts, resulting in considerable indirect expense to the country in question;