natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PE428.696v01-00 B7‑0090/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
PE428.696v1 B7‑0090/2009 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti njenih določb o spoštovanju, spodbujanju in zaščiti temeljnih pravic,
- having regard to the Treaty on the European Union and notably its provisions on the respect, promotion and protection of fundamental rights,
– ob upoštevanju člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ki obravnavata svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter pluralizem medijev,
- having regard to Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning freedom of expression and information as well as pluralism of the media,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2007/65/ES z dne 11. junija 2007 o spremembi Direktive Sveta 89/552/EGS o usklajevanju nekaterih zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o opravljanju dejavnosti razširjanja televizijskih programov UL L 332, 18.12.2007, str.
- having regard to Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007 amending Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o pluralizmu medijev v državah članicah Evropske unije ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
- having regard to the Commission s taff working document entitled ' Media pluralism in the Memb er States of the European Union' ( SEC(2007)0032 ) ,
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega poročila glede neodvisne študije o kazalnikih pluralizma medijev, ki jo je aprila 2009 za Komisijo opravila Katoliška univerza v Leuvnu (ICRI),
- having regard to the preliminary report of the independent UCL - ICRI study on the indicators of media pluralism carried out for the Commission in April 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji medijev in pluralizmu v Evropski uniji,
- having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2008 on media concentration and pluralism in the European Union ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2004 o nevarnosti kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji in predvsem v Italiji UL C 104 E, 20.4.2004, str.
- having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information OJ C 104 E, 20.4.2004, p.
A. ker Evropska unija zagovarja in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je določeno v členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, kjer sta svoboda in pluralizem medijev temeljna vidika teh svoboščin,
A. whereas the European Union defends and promotes freedom of expression and information, as provided for by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, where media freedom and pluralism are considered an essential aspect of those freedoms,
B. ker te svoboščine zajemajo svobodo mišljenja ter svobodo prejemanja in širjenja informacij brez vmešavanja ali pritiska oblasti,
B. whereas these freedoms include freedom of opinion and freedom to receive and communicate information without interference or pressure from the authorities,
C. ker se je v Italiji, še posebej v zadnjih mesecih, povečala zaskrbljenost v zvezi s to pravico, zlasti glede izvajanja pritiska in sprožitve sodnih postopkov s strani italijanskega predsednika vlade Berlusconija zoper nekatere največje italijanske časopise in nekatere evropske časopise zaradi objave informacij, ki ga zadevajo,
C. whereas in Italy, particularly in recent months, concern has arisen regarding respect for this right, especially in relation to pressure exerted and legal action brought by the Prime Minister, Mr Berlusconi, against some of the main Italian newspapers and against some European newspapers following the publication of information concerning him,
D. ker je bilo prav tako opaženo vmešavanje in izvajanje pritiska italijanskih organov na italijansko državno televizijo, zlasti glede oblikovanja njenega programa,
D. whereas interference and pressure from the Italian authorities have likewise been observed in relation to Italian State television broadcasting and especially its programming,
E. ker je v zadnjih letih Berlusconi pozval podjetja, naj ne oglašujejo v časopisih, ki nasprotujejo njegovim stališčem, zato so številna med njimi prenesla velik del svojega oglaševanja od tiskanih medijev in javne televizije na podjetje Mediaset (podjetje pod nadzorom Berlusconija),
E. whereas, in recent years, since Mr Berlusconi encouraged companies not to advertise in newspapers hostile to his positions, many of them have transferred much of their advertising from the print media and public television to Mediaset (a company which Mr Berlusconi controls),
F. ker predsednika italijanske vlade obtožujejo, da je spomladi leta 2009 odločilno vplival na imenovanje oseb na ključnih položajih državne televizijske postaje RAI,
F. whereas the Prime Minister is accused of having heavily influenced appointments to key posts in the State television company RAI in spring 2009,
G. ker je bilo to poletje politično zelo razburkano zaradi razprav v zvezi z zasebnim življenjem Berlusconija, v televizijskih programih RAI pa skorajda niso poročali o tem, in ker je Berlusconi dvakrat nastopil na televiziji sam in brez prisotnosti zagovornikov nasprotnih stališč,
G. whereas last summer the political turmoil surrounding Mr Berlusconi's private life was hardly reported on RAI channels, and whereas Mr Berlusconi went on air on two occasions alone and unchallenged,
H. ker je italijanska vlada septembra 2009 odrekla pravno varstvo najpomembnejši oddaji raziskovalnega novinarstva (oddaja Report) in je navedla, da namerava ukrepati proti nekaterim oddajam RAI zaradi obrekovanja,
H. whereas the Italian Government, in September 2009, denied legal protection to the most important investigative news programme (Report) and has indicated its intention to take proceedings against various RAI programmes accused of defamation,
I. ker je RAI začel kodirati svoje oddaje na italijanski plačljivi satelitski televiziji, kar zanj pomeni precejšnjo izgubo dohodka, podjetju Mediaset pa prinaša korist v obliki prihodkov z oglaševanjem,
I. whereas RAI has started to encrypt its broadcasting on Italian satellite pay-TV, a step resulting in serious financial cuts at RAI and giving Mediaset an advantage in terms of advertisement income,
J. ker so tovrstni pritiski in razmere, ki so zaradi tega nastale, v Italiji in Evropi sprožili proteste predstavnikov kulturnega življenja, tiska in drugih medijev, na političnem prizorišču pa so bili organizirani javni pozivi proti ustrahovanju medijev, kot sta poziv organizacije Articolo 21 ter poziv treh uglednih italijanskih konstitucionalistov, ki so zbrali več kot 445.000 podpisov v Italiji in Evropi, vključno s podpisi uglednih evropskih kulturnikov in politikov,
J. whereas this pressure and the situation arising from it have caused protests in Italy and Europe from representatives of cultural life, the press and other media, as well as in the political arena, where there have been public appeals against bullying of the media, involving among others the 'Articolo 21' association and three prominent Italian constitutionalists, whose appeal has already received more than 445 000 signatures in Italy and Europe, including those of well-known European political and cultural figures,
K. ker je v zvezi z zahtevo Komisije o pojasnitvi azilne politike italijanske vlade njen predsednik izjavil, da je Evropskemu svetu predlagal, da bi bil le predsednik Komisije pristojen za razširjanje informacij v zvezi s to institucijo, in je zagrozil, da bo blokiral delovanje Sveta, če njegov predlog ne bo sprejet, zaradi česar se je Mednarodna zveza novinarjev odzvala z objavo uradne izjave,
K. whereas, in connection with the Commission's request for clarification on the Italian Government's asylum policy, the Italian Prime Minister declared that he had proposed to the European Council that the Commission President should be the only member of the Commission authorised to disseminate information about that Institution's activities, and had threatened to block the functioning of the Council if his proposal was not followed - thus provoking an official statement in reaction from the International Press Association,
L. ker je predstavnik OVSE za svobodo tiska Miklós Haraszti 20. septembra 2009 predsednika italijanske vlade pisno pozval, naj umakne tožbe zaradi obrekovanja, v katerih od italijanskih časopisov zahteva odškodnino v višini 3 milijonov EUR,
L. whereas the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Miklós Haraszti, sent a letter to the Prime Minister of Italy on 20 September 2009 calling on him to drop the libel suits seeking damages of €3 m from Italian newspapers,
M. ker, kot je bilo že poudarjeno v resolucijah Evropskega parlamenta, najnovejša italijanska zakonodaja še ni rešila temeljnega vprašanja o navzkrižju interesov, ki zadeva dejstvo, da je podjetje Mediaset še vedno pod nadzorom predsednika italijanske vlade, ki ima tudi politični nadzor nad sektorjem javnih storitev v razmerah, kjer je stopnja koncentracije na trgu televizijskih medijev najvišja v Evropi in duopol televizijskih postaj RAI in Mediaset zajema skoraj 90 % vseh gledalcev televizijskega programa, RAI in Mediaset pa dobita 96,8 % celotnega prihodka od oglaševanja,
M. whereas, as already pointed out in other of its resolutions, the most recent Italian legislation has not resolved the issue at the heart of the conflict of interests, which is that the Prime Minister still controls the company Mediaset and has political control over the public-service sector in a situation where the level of concentration on the television market is the highest in Europe and the RAI-Mediaset duopoly has almost 90% of the entire TV audience, thereby collecting 96.8% of advertising revenue,
N. ker je bila v poročilu o svobodi tiska, ki ga pripravlja Freedom House, Italija uvrščena na 73. mesto in je bila prvič doslej opredeljena kot država, kjer je tisk samo "delno svoboden",
N. whereas Italy is ranked 73rd in the report on press freedom issued by Freedom House and is for the first time designated as being a country where the press is only 'partially free',
O. ker ima Svet na razpolago instrument (postopek iz člena 7), s katerim lahko državo članico opozori in kaznuje zaradi kršenja človekovih pravic, s čimer lahko zagotovi, da mora država članica spoštovati skupna pravila Unije,
O. whereas the Council has a tool - namely the Article 7 procedure - by means of which a Member State can be warned about, and punished for, breaches of human rights and it can be ensured that Member States adhere to the common rules of the Union,
P. ker kljub večkratnim pozivom Evropskega parlamenta Komisija ni pripravila določb za zaščito pluralizma na področju obveščanja v okviru ponovnega pregleda direktive o televiziji brez meja, ampak se je namesto tega odločila za poseben pristop na tem področju v treh korakih, ki predvideva pripravo delovnega dokumenta (sprejetega leta 2007), oblikovanje kazalnikov za opredelitev stanja pluralizma (v skladu z opredelitvijo neodvisne študije, ki je bila zaključena julija leta 2009) in pripravo osnutka sporočila v zvezi temi kazalniki (predvidoma šele v letu 2010),
P. whereas, despite its repeated calls, the Commission did not make any provision for protecting pluralism of information in the context of the revision of the 'Television without Frontiers' Directive, committing itself instead to a specific three-step procedure in this field whereby it would draft a working document (adopted in 2007), devise indicators to define the state of pluralism (as established by an independent study finished in July 2009) and issue a draft communication concerning these indicators (scheduled only for 2010),
Q. ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je Evropski parlament v svojih resolucijah večkrat pozval Komisijo, naj ukrepa in zaščiti pluralizem, naj nemudoma objavi sporočilo o zaščiti medijskega pluralizma v državah članicah ter brez odlašanja dokonča regulativni okvir s pripravo predloga direktive o tem vprašanju,
Q. having regard to its repeated calls to the Commission, in various resolutions, to take action to protect pluralism, to issue an urgent communication on safeguarding media pluralism in the Member States and to complete the regulatory framework as a matter of urgency by submitting a proposal for a directive on this issue,
3. izraža mnenje, da razhajanja med nacionalnimi zakonodajami glede koncentracije medijev lahko škodijo delovanju notranjega trga, zlasti prostemu pretoku storitev in svobodi ustanavljanja, ter z odobravanjem podpira kakršno koli pobudo za boljše usklajevanje takšnih nacionalnih pravil;
Considers that the divergences between national laws with regard to media concentration may harm the operation of the internal market and particularly the free movement of services and freedom of establishment and expresses its approval of any initiative designed to promote the convergence of such national rules;
7. poziva Svet, naj začne postopek iz člena 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki predvideva, da se državo članico lahko opozori ali kaznuje za kršenje človekovih pravic;
Invites the Council to initiate the procedure under Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union whereby a Member State can be warned of, and punished for, breaches of human rights;
14.10.2009 B7-0091/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.10.2009 B7-0091/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE428.697v01-00 B7‑0091/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
PE428.697v01-00 B7‑0091/2009 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy
– ob upoštevanju člena 21 ustave Italijanske republike,
– having regard to Article 21 of the Italian Constitution,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice,
– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities and of the European Court of Human Rights,
B. ker je varovanje človekovih pravic v skladu s členoma 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji med prednostnimi cilji Evropske unije in ker se ni nikoli zahtevalo, da Evropski Parlament ugotovi, da obstaja jasna nevarnost, da pride v Italiji do hude kršitve načel svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
B. whereas protecting human rights is one of the European Union’s priorities under Articles 6 and 7 of the EU Treaty, and whereas the European Parliament has never asked the Council ‘to determine that there is a clear risk of a serious breach’ by Italy ‘of the principles of liberty, democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms’,
C. ker v Italiji za svobodo tiska jamči ustavna listina, ki uzakonja popolno svobodo izražanja svojega mnenja,
C. whereas freedom of the press is guaranteed in Italy by the Constitutional Charter, which enshrines the unqualified right to express one’s opinion freely,
D. ker je bilo po podatkih opazovalnega centra za medije iz Pavije v mesecu juniju 2009 v televizijskih dnevnikih državne televizije RAI 60 % časa namenjenega strankam opozicije, v televizijskih dnevnikih skupine Mediaset pa 49 % časa,
D. whereas, according to statistics gathered by the independent Pavia Observatory for Media Research, in June 2009 representatives of opposition parties accounted for 60% of air time on RAI TV news programmes, and 49% on Mediaset Group news programmes,
E. ker med 455 sodbami Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice o kršitvi člena 10 o svobodi izražanja jih 29 zadeva Francijo, 28 Združeno Kraljestvo, 15 Grčijo, deset Romunijo, osem Poljsko in sedem Italijo,
E. whereas, of the 455 judgments of the European Court of Human Rights relating to violations of Article 10 on freedom of expression, 29 concern France, 28 the United Kingdom, 15 Greece, 10 Romania, eight Poland and seven Italy,
2. veseli se živahnih idejnih in političnih razprav o pluralizmu medijev, ki potekajo v Italiji in ki zadevajo vsa sredstva obveščanja: tisk, analogno in digitalno televizijo, radio in internet;
Welcomes the very lively public and political debate on media pluralism currently taking place in Italy, which encompasses all the mass media, including the press, analogue and digital television, radio and the internet;
5. poudarja, da so zadnji tehnološki dosežki prek interneta, digitalizacije, satelita, kabla in drugih tehnologij odprli komunikacijski sektor novim akterjem ter da s tega vidika v Italiji ni nikakršnega monopola na področju obveščanja; meni, da so digitalni mediji po naravi sposobni zagotoviti širšo izbiro in večje sodelovanje državljanov ter da je razvoj blogosfere pospešil svobodo izražanja in pluralizem;
Emphasises that the latest technological developments have opened the communication sector up to new players through the internet, digital, satellite and cable transmission and other technologies, and that there is consequently no monopoly on information in Italy; considers that the very nature of the digital media enables them to provide greater choice and allow more individual involvement, and that the development of the blogosphere has furthered freedom of expression and pluralism;
7. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in držav pristopnic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and accession countries.
14.10.2009 B7-0092/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.10.2009 B7-0092/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE428.700v01-00 B7‑0092/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
PE428.700v01-00 B7‑0092/2009 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy
– ob upoštevanju člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki obravnavata svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter pluralizem medijev,
– having regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, which concern freedom of expression and information and pluralism of the media,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralizmu sredstev obveščanja v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
– having regard to the working document of the Commission on pluralism of the information media in the EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
– ob upoštevanju predhodnega poročila glede neodvisne študije o kazalnikih pluralizma medijev, ki jo je v aprilu 2009 za Komisijo opravila Katoliška univerza v Louvainu – center ICRI,
– having regard to the preliminary report on the independent study of indicators of media pluralism drafted by UCL-ICRI for the Commission in April 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0459 .
– having regard to its Resolution of 25 September 2008 on concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0459 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2004 o nevarnosti kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji in predvsem v Italiji UL C 104 E, 20.4.2004, str.
– having regard to its Resolution of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation, in the European Union and especially in Italy, of freedom of expression and information OJ C 104 E, 20.4.2004, p.
A. ker je koncentracija številnih medijev v rokah enega posameznika v nasprotju s temeljnim načelom svobodnega obveščanja,
A. whereas the concentration of several media in the hands of a single person contradicts the fundamental principle of freedom of information,
B. ker Evropska unija zagovarja in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je določeno v členu 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah in členu 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, kjer sta svoboda in pluralizem medijev bistvena,
B. whereas the European Union defends and promotes freedom of expression and information, as provided for by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, where media freedom and pluralism are considered an essential aspect,
C. ker te svoboščine vključujejo svobodo mišljenja ter svobodo prejemanja in širjenja informacij brez vmešavanja ali pritiska oblasti,
C. whereas these freedoms include freedom of opinion and freedom to receive and communicate information without interference or pressure from the authorities,
D. ker se je v Italiji, še posebej v zadnjih mesecih, povečala zaskrbljenost v zvezi s to pravico, zlasti glede izvajanja pritiska in sprožitve sodnih postopkov s strani italijanskega predsednika vlade zoper nekatere največje italijanske časopise in nekatere evropske časopise,
D. whereas in Italy, particularly in recent months, concern has arisen regarding respect for this right, especially in relation to pressure exerted and legal action brought by the Prime Minister against some of the main Italian newspapers and against some European newspapers,
E. ker je bilo prav tako opaženo resno vmešavanje in izvajanje pritiska italijanskih vladnih organov na italijansko državno televizijo, zlasti ustrahovanje glede oblikovanja televizijskega sporeda,
E. whereas serious interference and pressure from the Italian governmental authorities have likewise been observed in relation to Italian State television broadcasting, especially intimidation concerning programming,
F. ker so tovrstni pritiski in razmere, ki so zaradi tega nastale, v Italiji in Evropi sprožili proteste predstavnikov kulturnega življenja, tiska in drugih medijev, na političnem prizorišču pa so bili organizirani javni pozivi proti ustrahovanju medijev (poziv je podpisalo več kot 400.000 podpisnikov iz Italije in Evrope) in množična demonstracija, ki se je je 3. oktobra 2009 udeležilo več sto tisoč ljudi,
F. whereas this pressure and the situation arising from it have caused protests in Italy and Europe from representatives of cultural life, the press and other media, as well as in the political arena, where there have been public appeals against bullying of the media (which received more than 400 000 signatures in Italy and Europe) and led to a mass demonstration by hundreds of thousands of people on 3 October 2009,
G. ker je predstavnik OVSE za svobodo tiska Miklós Haraszti 20. septembra 2009 predsednika italijanske vlade pisno pozval, naj umakne tožbe zaradi obrekovanja, v katerih od italijanskih časopisov zahteva odškodnino v višini 3 milijonov EUR,
G. whereas the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, Miklós Haraszti, sent a letter to the Prime Minister of Italy on 20 September 2009 calling on him to drop the libel suits seeking damages of €3 m from Italian newspapers,