natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je treba biti pri recikliranju bioloških odpadkov za proizvodnjo energije pozoren na vidike energetske učinkovitosti in trajnostnega razvoja ter predvsem da je treba tako proizvodnjo uporabiti na čim učinkovitejši način, zato ponavlja, da je ločeno zbiranje odpadkov ključno za izpolnjevanje zahtev iz direktive o odlagališčih Direktiva 1999/31/ES, uvodna izjava 17.
Stresses that, during energy recovery from bio-waste, attention must be paid to energy efficiency and sustainable development aspects and that these products should therefore primarily be used in the most efficient manner; reiterates therefore that separate refuse collections are essential in order to comply with the Landfill Directive Directive 1999/31/EC, Recital 17.
, da bi zagotovili vir kakovostnih snovi za reciklažo bioloških odpadkov in izboljšali učinkovitost pridobivanja energije;
, to provide quality input to bio-waste recycling and to improve the efficiency of energy recovery;
ugotavlja, da je treba pustiti odprta vsa tehnološka orodja in vse možnosti za kar najboljše recikliranje ali pridobivanje bioplina, če naj bi povečali stopnje preusmeritve, recikliranja in pridobivanja bioplina;
Notes that in order to increase diversion, recycling and biogas generation rates, all technological tools and options that maximise resource recycling or biogas generation should be left open.
meni, da so biološki odpadki pomemben obnovljiv vir za proizvodnjo električne energije ter biogoriva za prevoz in plina za uporabo v plinskih omrežjih, saj se biometan (ki sestoji večinoma iz metana – 50–75 % – in ogljikovega dioksida) pridobiva s prečiščevanjem bioplina, ter poziva Komisijo, naj preuči in spodbudi možnosti za uporabo bioloških odpadkov za pridobivanje bioplina;
Considers bio-waste to be a valuable renewable resource for the production of electricity and biofuel for transport and for feeding into the gas network through conversion of biogas into biomethane (mainly methane – 50 % to 75 % – and carbon dioxide), and calls on the Commission to analyse and promote ways of using bio-waste to produce biogas;
poudarja, da je treba biološke odpadke bolj preusmerjati stran od odlagališč; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da lahko biološki odpadki prispevajo k cilju EU najmanj 20 % obnovljive energije do leta 2020 ter cilju direktive EU o kakovosti goriv; opominja, da direktiva o obnovljivih virih podpira uporabo vseh vrst biomase, tudi bioloških odpadkov za energetske namene, kot obnovljivega vira energije, in da biogoriva iz odpadkov štejejo dvojno na poti k dosegi cilja 10 % glede obnovljivih virov energije v prometu; zato poziva države članice, naj upoštevajo pridobivanje energije iz biološko razgradljivih delov odpadkov v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji kot del celovite politike glede hierarhije odpadkov ter si izmenjajo zamisli o najboljši praksi;
Stresses that diverting bio-waste from landfills needs to be increased; notes, in this context, that bio-waste can contribute to the EU target of at least 20 % renewable energy by 2020 and also that of the EU Fuel Quality Directive; recalls that the Renewables Directive supports the use of all types of biomass, including bio-waste for energy purposes, as a renewable source of energy, and that bio-fuels from waste count double towards the 10 % renewable energy target in transport; calls, therefore, on Member States to consider energy recovery from the biodegradable parts of waste in their national legislation as part of an integrated waste hierarchy policy and urges them to share best practice ideas;
Raziskave in inovacije:
Research and innovation
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo in podpira znanstvene raziskave in tehnološke inovacije na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki;
Urges the Commission and Member States to encourage and support scientific research and technological innovation in the field of bio-waste management;
poziva Komisijo k nadaljnjemu sodelovanju pri raziskavah metod obdelave bioloških odpadkov za boljšo presojo koristi v povezavi s prstjo predelavo energije in vplivi na okolje;
Calls on the Commission to engage further in research into bio-waste treatment methods in order to better quantify its soil-related benefits, as well as its energy recovery and the environmental impacts;
Ozaveščanje in obveščanje:
Awareness and information
odločno poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo dejavnosti za povečanje okoljske ozaveščenosti o bioloških odpadkih, zlasti v šolah in višjih izobraževalnih ustanovah, da bi spodbudili boljše vedenjske vzorce glede preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov in trajnostno ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki in trdnimi komunalnimi odpadki ter povečali ozaveščenost javnosti o preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov in recikliranju ter prednostih ločenega zbiranja in biološke obdelave bioloških odpadkov; v zvezi s tem poudarja, kako pomembna je vloga mest, občin in komunalnih podjetij pri svetovanju in pripravi informacij za državljane s področja preprečevanja nastajanja odpadkov,
Urges the Commission and the Member States to promote environmental awareness-raising activities in the field of bio-waste, particularly in schools and higher education institutions so as to promote better waste prevention behaviour patterns, to foster the sustainable management of bio-waste and municipal solid waste and to raise public awareness of waste prevention and recycling as well as the advantages of separate collection and the biological treatment of bio-waste; stresses in this context the important role of towns, municipalities and municipal undertakings in advising and informing citizens about prevention of waste;
Okoljski vidiki:
Environmental aspects
meni, da je treba obdelane biološke odpadke uporabiti za ohranjanje organske snovi in sklenitev krogotokov hranilnih snovi, zlasti fosfatnega tokokroga, tako da se jih reciklira v tla; zato poziva Komisijo, naj prizna, da je treba preskusiti, ali politike prispevajo k omilitvi nesprejemljivo hitrega izrabljanja svetovnih fosfatnih virov;
Considers that treated bio-waste should be used to conserve organic matter and complete nutrient cycles, especially the phosphate cycle, by recycling it into the soil and calls therefore on the Commission to recognise that policies should be tested for their contributions to mitigating the unacceptably rapid depletion of the world's phosphate resources;
poudarja, da je treba biološke odpadke, ki ne vsebujejo škodljivih snovi, obravnavati kot dragocen naravni vir za proizvodnjo kakovostnega komposta,
Stresses that bio-waste which is free of pollutants needs to be regarded as a valuable natural resource that can be used to produce quality compost;
meni, da je prihodnost kmetijstva odvisna tudi od ohranjanja in obnavljanja rodovitnosti tal; ugotavlja, da lahko uporaba kakovostnega komposta v kmetijstvu prispeva k ohranjanju rodovitnosti tal, povečanju zmogljivosti tal za zadrževanje vode, zmogljivosti za vezavo ogljika in zmanjšanju uporabe sintetičnih gnojil; poudarja vlogo držav članic pri zagotavljanju kakovostnega komposta na kmetijskih zemljiščih,
Considers that the future of agriculture also depends on conservation and restoration of soil fertility; notes that the use of quality compost in farming can contribute to preserving land productivity, increasing water retention and carbon storage capacity and reducing the use of synthetic fertilisers; stresses the role of Member States in ensuring the use of quality compost on agricultural land;
opozarja, da je pline, ki se sproščajo pri kompostiranju snovi na odlagališčih, le težko nadzorovati, kar utegne biti resna nevarnost za okolje in ozračje; opozarja tudi, da k pravilno zasnovanemu kompostiranju predvsem bioloških komunalnih odpadkov sodi tudi varstvo podtalnice pred izcednimi vodami iz kompostišča;
Points out that the monitoring of gases given off by substances in landfill may be hindered during composting, which may pose a major threat to the environment and the atmosphere; recalls that correct composting – particularly of municipal bio-waste – involves protecting groundwater against leachate from the composting plant;
poudarja, da ima kombinacija kompostiranja in fermentacije ločeno zbranih bioloških odpadkov, če je mogoča, nedvomno prednosti za uresničitev teh ciljev na različnih ravneh (boj proti segrevanju podnebja, degradacija tal in erozija prsti, doseganje ciljev obnovljive energije) in jo je treba spodbujati;
Stresses that, with a view to attaining objectives at various levels (combating climatic warming, soil degradation and soil erosion; attaining renewable energy objectives), a combination of composting and fermentation of selectively collected bio-waste, if feasible, undoubtedly possesses advantages and should be encouraged;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga nacionalne cilje za recikliranje bioloških odpadkov, da bi bilo manj takih odpadkov pri drugih, manj zaželenih rešitvah za ravnanje z odpadki, na primer odlaganju na odlagališčih ali sežiganju;
Calls therefore on the Commission to propose national bio-waste recycling targets to limit the amount of bio-waste available for the least desirable waste management solutions like landfilling and incineration;
Skladnost z direktivo o odlagališčih:
Compliance with Landfill Directive
opozarja, da mora ravnanje s tovrstnimi odpadki na splošno slediti hierarhiji postopkov za njihovo obdelavo: preprečevanje nastajanja, recikliranje, drugi načini predelave, med drugim za pridobivanje energije, ter odlaganje kot zadnja rešitev (Direktiva 1999/31/ES, člen 5, in Direktiva 2008/98/ES UL L 312, 22.11.2008, str.
Reiterates that bio-waste management must be structured in line with the waste treatment hierarchy, namely: prevention, recycling, other forms of waste recovery, including energy recovery, and, as a last option, disposal in landfills (Directive 1999/31/EC, Art. 5 and Directive 2008/98/EC OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p.
); poziva Komisijo, naj odločneje zagotavlja spoštovanje in uporabo določb o odlaganju odpadkov v vsej Uniji;
); calls on the Commission to make greater efforts to enforce and secure the application of the laws on landfilling throughout the the Community;
ugotavlja, da se veljavni nacionalni zakonodajni ukrepi in sistemi ravnanja z odpadki med državami članicami razlikujejo in da je odlaganje trdnih komunalnih odpadkov v Evropski uniji še vedno najpogosteje uporabljen postopek; poziva države članice, naj povečajo svoje sodelovanje in izmenjavo najboljše prakse na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki;
Notes that the individual Member States have different existing national legislative measures and different waste management systems and that the use of landfill continues to be the most common disposal method for municipal solid waste in the European Union; calls on the Member States to increase their cooperation and their exchange of best practices in the field of bio-waste management;
meni, da je mehansko-biološka obdelava učinkovita možnost, pri kateri se velike količine gnijočih odpadkov uporabi za kompostiranje, anaerobno razgradnjo in pridobivanje energije;
Considers mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) to be an effective way of diverting significant quantities of putrescible waste away from landfills for use in composting, anaerobic digestion and energy recovery;
Ekonomski vidiki:
Economic aspects
meni, da so potrebne finančne spodbude za širitev tega ločenega zbiranja in drugih sistemov upravljanja bioloških odpadkov, ki kar najbolje izkoristijo obnovo virov;
Considers that financial incentives are needed to expand this separate collection and other bio-waste management systems that maximise resource recovery;
poudarja, da je treba izboljšati upravljanje z odpadki in bolje uskladiti standarde kakovosti za kompost, da bi spodbudili razvoj evropskega trga za kompost;
Stresses that improvements in bio-waste management and the harmonisation of quality standards for compost are needed to encourage the development of a European market for compost;
meni, bi moralo biti načelo ’onesnaževalec plača’ podlaga za povračilo povečanih stroškov zaradi vnosa škodljivih snovi, tako da negativni zunanji dejavniki uporabe bioloških odpadkov ne bi bremenili kmetijstva;
Considers that the ’polluter pays’ principle should be taken as the basis for compensation for additional costs arising from inputs of pollutants, so that the negative externalities of spreading bio-waste are not paid for by farmers;
poudarja, da v številnih državah članicah nekaj infrastrukture že obstaja, vendar so potrebne finančne spodbude, da bi oblikovali in razvili morebitne trge za kompost, pregnito blato, bioenergijo in biogorivo iz bioloških odpadkov;
Underlines the fact that in many Member States some infrastructure is already in place but that financial incentives are required to create and establish the potential markets in compost and digestate, bioenergy and biofuel from bio-waste;
poudarja okoljske koristi proizvodnje goriv za prevoz iz bioloških odpadkov; poziva države članice, naj glede na hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki upoštevajo te koristi pri izvajanju okvirne direktive o odpadkih, ter Komisijo, naj jih upošteva pri pripravi smernic o izvajanju;
Underlines the environmental advantage of producing transport fuels from bio-waste; calls for Member States, in the light of the waste hierarchy, to take this into account when they implement the revised Waste Framework Directive, and for the Commission to reflect this in its implementing guidelines;
poziva Komisijo, naj v vse sedanje ali dodatne študije učinka vključi vprašanje, katere vrste ekonomskih spodbud, skladov ali pomoči bi lahko uporabili ali ustvarili za razvoj in izvajanje tehnologij, ki omogočajo pravilno ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki;
Urges the Commission to include in all current or additional impact studies on the matter the question of what type of economic incentives, funds or aids could be mobilised or created for the development and implantation of technologies permitting the proper management of bio-waste;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. julija 2010 o prejemkih direktorjev javnih družb in politiki prejemkov v sektorju finančnih storitev ( 2010/2009(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 7 July 2010 on remuneration of directors of listed companies and remuneration policies in the financial services sector ( 2010/2009(INI) )
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 30. aprila 2009 o plačnih politikah v sektorju finančnih storitev (C(2009)3159),
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 30 April 2009 on remuneration policies in the financial services sector (C(2009)3159),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 30. aprila 2009 o dopolnitvi priporočil 2004/913/ES in 2005/162/ES glede sistema prejemkov direktorjev javnih družb (C(2009)3177),
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 30 April 2009 complementing Recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for the remuneration of directors of listed companies (C(2009)3177),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv 2006/48/ES in 2006/49/ES v zvezi s kapitalskimi zahtevami za trgovalno knjigo in za dodatna listinjenja ter v zvezi z nadzorniškim pregledom politik prejemkov ( KOM(2009)0362 ),
having regard the Commission proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC as regards capital requirements for the trading book and for re-securitisations, and the supervisory review of remuneration policies ( COM(2009)0362 ),
ob upoštevanju načel Foruma za finančno stabilnost z dne 2. aprila 2009 za premišljeno prakso nadomestil in priloženih izvedbenih standardov z dne 25. septembra 2009,
having regard to the Financial Stability Forum's (FSB) Principles for Sound Compensation Practices of 2 April 2009 and the accompanying Implementation Standards of 25 September 2009,
ob upoštevanju načel na visoki ravni za politiko prejemkov Odbora evropskih bančnih nadzornikov (CEBS) z dne 20. aprila 2009,
having regard to the Committee of European Banking Supervisors' (CEBS) High-level Principles for Remuneration Policies of 20 April 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora evropskih bančnih nadzornikov o nacionalnem izvajanju njegovih načel na visoki ravni za politiko prejemkov z dne 11. junija 2010,
having regard to the CEBS report on national implementation of CEBS High-level Principles for Remuneration Policies of 11 June 2010,
ob upoštevanju načel za nadomestila in metodologije za oceno standardov, ki jih je januarja 2010 predlagal Baselski odbor za bančni nadzor,
having regard to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's Compensation Principles and Standards Assessment Methodology of January 2010,
ob upoštevanju dokumenta Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) iz februarja 2010 o upravljanju družb in finančni krizi – sklepi in novi primeri dobre prakse za boljše izvajanje načel,
having regard to the OECD's paper of February 2010 on Corporate governance and the financial crisis - conclusions and emerging good practices to enhance implementation of the Principles,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. maja 2010 o deontoloških vprašanjih glede upravljanja družb Sprejeta besedila P7_TA(2010)0165 .
having regard to its resolution of 18 May 2010 on deontological questions related to companies management Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0165 .
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 2. junija 2010 o korporativnem upravljanju finančnih institucij in politiki prejemkov ( KOM(2010)0284 ),
having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 2 June 2010 on corporate governance in financial institutions and remuneration policies ( COM(2010)0284 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 2. junija 2010 o izvajanju Priporočila Komisije 2009/385/ES (Priporočilo iz leta 2009 o prejemkih direktorjev) o dopolnitvi priporočil 2004/913/ES in 2005/162/ES glede sistema prejemkov direktorjev javnih družb v državah članicah EU ( KOM(2010)0285 ),
having regard to the Commission report of 2 June 2010 on the application by Member States of the EU of the Commission 2009/385/EC Recommendation (2009 Recommendation of directors' remuneration) complementing Recommendations 2004/913/EC and 2005/162/EC as regards the regime for remuneration of directors of listed companies ( COM(2010)0285 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 2. junija 2010 o izvajanju Priporočila Komisije 2009/384/ES o plačnih politikah v sektorju finančnih storitev v državah članicah EU ( KOM(2010)0286 ),
having regard to the Commission report of 2 June 2010 on the application by Member States of the EU of the Commission 2009/384/EC Recommendation on remuneration policies in the financial services sector ( COM(2010)0286 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7-0208/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A7-0208/2010 ),
ker je bila v finančnem sektorju in nekaterih javnih družbah politika prejemkov za kategorije zaposlenih, ki s svojo poklicno dejavnostjo bistveno vplivajo na profil tveganja podjetja ali družbe, takšna, da je spodbujala transakcije za kratkoročno dobičkonosnost, kot posledica pa so se čedalje bolj tvegani poslovni modeli razvili do take mere, da so bili v škodo delavcev, varčevalcev in vlagateljev ter trajnostne rasti na splošno,
whereas, in the financial sector and in some listed companies, remuneration policies for categories of staff whose professional activity has a material impact on the company's risk profile have been such as to encourage transactions seeking short-term profits, with increasingly risky business models being developed to that end, to the detriment of workers, savers and investors, and sustainable growth in general,
ker je Komisija v svoji zeleni knjigi o korporativnem upravljanju finančnih institucij in politiki prejemkov poudarila, da so bile finančne institucije zaradi pomanjkanja učinkovitih kontrolnih mehanizmov izpostavljene prevelikim tveganjem in da bi bilo treba pri korporativnem upravljanju upoštevati stabilnost finančnega sistema, ki je odvisen od dejanj številnih udeležencev,
whereas the Commission's Green Paper on corporate governance in financial institutions and remuneration policies stresses that the lack of effective control mechanisms contributed significantly to excessive risk-taking on the part of financial institutions, and that corporate governance should take account of the stability of the financial system, which depends on the actions of many players,
ker so neprimerne strukture prejemkov nekaterih finančnih institucij, ki spodbujajo prekomerna in nepremišljena tveganja, prispevale k kopičenju tveganj, zaradi katerih je prišlo do sedanje finančne, gospodarske in socialne krize ter so zato glavna skrb oblikovalcev politike in regulatorjev,
whereas inappropriate remuneration structures of some financial institutions that incentivise excessive and imprudent risk-taking played a role in the accumulation of risks that led to the current financial, economic and social crisis, and are therefore a major issue of concern for policy-makers and regulators,
ker morajo finančne institucije kot del svoje družbene odgovornosti na celovit način upoštevati družbeno okolje, v katerem delujejo, pa tudi interese vseh sodelujočih strani, na primer strank, delničarjev in zaposlenih,
whereas financial institutions must take into account, as part of their corporate social responsibility, the social environment in which the institution operates, as well as the interests of all of parties involved, such as its clients, shareholders and employees, in an integrated manner,
ker so se na svetovni, evropski in nacionalni ravni začele izvajati številne pobude za obravnavanje sporne prakse prejemkov in ker je bistveno, da se na svetovni ravni sprejme usklajen pristop ter tako zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji, pa tudi globalna konkurenčnost Evrope in spodbujanje trajnostne in poštene konkurence med trgi,
whereas numerous initiatives have been launched at the global, European and national levels to address the issue of problematic remuneration practices, and whereas a globally coordinated approach is essential in order not only to guarantee a level playing field, but also to ensure the global competitiveness of Europe and to promote sustainable and fair competition between market places,
ker je v načelih premišljene prakse nadomestil, ki jih je sprejel Forum za finančno stabilnost in so jih potrdili voditelji skupine G-20, opredeljenih pet elementov za premišljeno prakso prejemkov in ker je treba upoštevati pomen spodbujanja sočasnega izvajanja teh načel,
whereas the FSB Principles for Sound Compensation Practices, which were endorsed by the G20 leaders, set out five elements for sound remuneration practices, and having regard to the importance of promoting simultaneous implementation of these principles,
ker je treba dogovorjena načela in že sprejete ukrepe glede politike prejemkov nenehno pregledovati in po potrebi prilagoditi, da se po vsej Evropi ustvarijo enotne razmere in da se zagotovi konkurenčnost evropske finančne industrije na svetovni ravni,
whereas the agreed principles and measures already taken in respect of remuneration policy should be continually reviewed and, where necessary, adapted in order to create uniform conditions throughout Europe and secure the global competitiveness of the European finance industry,
ker so različne znanstvene študije in praktične izkušnje pokazale, da je vpliv nezavezujočih priporočil na politiko prejemkov omejen, zaradi česar je treba uvesti močnejši instrument, ki bo zagotovil spoštovanje teh načel,
whereas several scientific studies, as well as practical experience, have demonstrated the limited impact of non-binding recommendations on remuneration policies, which underlines the need to put in place a stronger instrument in order to ensure respect for the principles,