natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Protokol iz leta 2002 k Atenski konvenciji o prevozu potnikov in njihove prtljage po morju iz leta 1974 si prizadeva odpraviti določene pomanjkljivosti pri urejanju odgovornosti prevoznikov na mednarodni ravni.
The 2002 Protocol to the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea of 1974 aims at addressing certain shortcomings in the regulation of the liability of carriers at international level.
Večina členov Atenskega protokola se nanaša na predloge sprememb Atenske konvencije v zvezi z odgovornostjo prevoznikov, obveznim zavarovanjem, omejitvami odgovornosti v primeru smrti ali telesnih poškodb oziroma izgube ali poškodbe prtljage in vozil ter vprašanji na področju računovodstva in konverzij.
The majority of the articles of the Athens Protocol concern amendments to the Athens Convention regarding liability of a carrier, compulsory insurance, limit for liability for death and personal injury or for loss of or damage to luggage and vehicles and accounting and conversion issues.
Vsa ta vprašanja spadajo na področje prometa, zato je Odbor za promet pristojen za pripravo zakonodajne resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o osnutku sklepa v zvezi s temi členi.
These are all issues relating to transport and the Committee on Transport is therefore responsible for drafting the European Parliament legislative resolution on the draft Decision relating to those articles.
Odbor za pravne zadeve je v skladu s Prilogo VII Poslovnika med drugim pristojen za razlago in uporabo zakonodaje Unije ter skladnost aktov Unije s primarno zakonodajo, zlasti v zvezi z izbiro pravne podlage, razlago in uporabo mednarodnega prava, kar zadeva Unijo, ter ukrepe na področju pravosodnega in upravnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah.
Under Annex VII to the Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Legal Affairs is responsible for, inter alia , the interpretation and application of Union law and compliance of Union acts with primary law, notably the choice of legal bases, the interpretation and application of international law, in so far as the Union is affected, and measures concerning judicial and administrative cooperation in civil matters.
Ker se člena 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola nanašata na vprašanja o pristojnih sodiščih ter priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb, je člen 81(1) PDEU o pravosodnem sodelovanju v civilnih zadevah ustrezna pravna podlaga za pristop k tema členoma, Odbor za pravne zadeve pa je s tem pristojni odbor za ta vidik pristopa k Protokolu.
Since Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol concern questions relating to jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments, the relevant legal basis as far as those articles are concerned is Article 81(1) TFEU on judicial cooperation in civil matters and the Committee on Legal Affairs is thus the committee responsible for this aspect of accession to the Protocol.
Uredba (ES) št. 392/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2009 o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju v primeru nesreč
Regulation (EC) No 392/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents
UL L 131, 28.5.2009, str.
OJ L 131, 28.5.2009, p.
24. je bila sprejeta, da bi upoštevala te spremembe Atenske konvencije.
24. was adopted in order to take account of these amendments to the Athens Convention.
Uvodna izjava 11 uredbe navaja, da bodo vprašanja, obravnavana v členih 10 in 11 Protokola, postala sestavni del pravnega reda Unije, ko bo Unija pristopila k Atenski konvenciji, če navedena člena vplivata na določbe iz Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
Recital 11 of the Regulation specifies that those matters covered by Articles 10 and 11 of the Protocol will form part of the Union legal order when it accedes to the Athens Convention in so far as they affect the rules established by Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters
Osnutek sklepa določa izjave, ki jih mora Unija podati ob deponiranju listine o pristopu v zvezi z Uredbo Sveta št. 44/2001, nesodelovanjem Danske v skladu s členoma 1 in 2 Protokola (št. 22) k PDEU in priznavanjem sodnih odločb tretje države, zavezane h Konvenciji iz Lugana o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah iz leta 2007.
The draft Decision sets out the declarations to be made by the Union at the time of the deposit of the instrument of accession relating to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, Denmark's exemption in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol (No 22) to the TFEU and the recognition of judgments given by a third State bound by the Lugano Convention on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters of 2007.
Unija mora svojo listino o pristopu v zvezi s členoma 10 in 11 Atenskega protokola deponirati najkasneje 31. decembra 2011.
The Union is to deposit its instruments of accession as regards Articles 10 and 11 of the Athens Protocol by 31 December 2011.
Kadar mora Parlament dati odobritev za predlagani akt, se v skladu s členom 81 Poslovnika odloči na podlagi priporočila pristojnega odbora za sprejetje ali zavrnitev akta.
According to Rule 81 of the Rules of Procedure, where Parliament is asked to give its consent to a proposed act, it is to take a decision on the basis of a recommendation from the committee responsible to approve or reject the act.
Parlament sprejme sklep z enim samim glasovanjem, pri čemer ni mogoče vlagati predlogov sprememb.
Parliament shall take this decision by means of a single vote, and no amendments may be tabled.
Priporočilo poročevalca je, naj Parlament odobri pristop k Protokolu.
The rapporteur proposes that Parliament should give its consent to accession to the Protocol.
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Sajjad Karim, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Sajjad Karim, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Tadeusz Zwiefka
o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu
on online gambling in the Internal Market
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 24. marca 2011 z naslovom Zelena knjiga o spletnih igrah na srečo na notranjem trgu ( KOM(2011)0128 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 24 March 2011 entitled ‘Green Paper on online gambling in the Internal Market’ ( COM(2011)0128 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 51, 52 in 56 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 51, 52 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki je priložen Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality annexed to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju povezane sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije
– having regard to the relevant case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2009 o neoporečnosti spletnih iger na srečo
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2009 on the integrity of online gambling
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. maja 2008 o Beli knjigi o športu
– having regard to its resolution of 8 May 2008 on the White Paper on Sport
UL C 16E, 12.11.2009, str.
OJ C 271E, 12.11.2009, p.51. ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu ter o spremembi Direktive Sveta 84/450/EGS, direktiv 97/7/ES, 98/27/ES in 2002/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ter Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
– having regard to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 97/7/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. maja 1997 o varstvu potrošnikov glede sklepanja pogodb pri prodaji na daljavo
– having regard to Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma
– having regard to Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 6. junija 2011 z naslovom Boj proti korupciji v EU,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 6 June 2011 entitled ‘Fighting corruption in the EU’,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov
– having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. januarja 2011 z naslovom Razvijanje evropske razsežnosti v športu,
– having regard to the Commission communication of 18 January 2011 entitled ‘Developing the European Dimension in Sport’,
UL L 347, 11.12.2006, str.
OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o določenih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja, na notranjem trgu
– having regard to Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce in the Internal Market
UL L 178, 17.7.2000, str.
OJ L 178, 17.07.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0342/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0342/2011 ),
A. ker so spletne igre na srečo stalnem porastu, do neke mere zunaj nadzora nacionalnih vlad državljanov, ki se jim ponuja te storitve spletnih iger na srečo, in ker je ta panoga drugačna od drugih trgov zaradi tveganj, ki zadevajo varstvo potrošnikov in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu;
A. whereas the online gambling sector is growing constantly, to some extent outside the control of the national governments of the citizens to whom such gambling services are provided, and whereas this sector is unlike other markets on account of the risks involved in terms of consumer protection and the fight against organised crime,
B. ker ob uporabi načela subsidiarnosti ni bil sprejet noben poseben evropski pravni akt, ki bi urejal spletne igre na srečo;
B. whereas, in application of the principle of subsidiarity, there is no specific European legislative act regulating online gambling,
C. ker igre na srečo ureja vrsta aktov EU, kot so direktiva o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij, direktiva o prodaji na daljavo, direktiva o preprečevanju pranja denarja, direktiva o varstvu osebnih podatkov, direktiva o varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij in direktiva o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost;
C. whereas gambling services are subject to a number of EU acts such as the Audiovisual Media Services Directive, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive, the Distance Selling Directive, the Anti-Money Laundering Directive, the Data Protection Directive, the Directive on privacy and electronic communication, and the Directive on the common system of value added tax,
D. ker je panoga iger na srečo v državah članicah različno pravno urejena, kar reguliranim ponudnikom otežuje, da bi zagotovili zakonite storitve iger na srečo prek meja, regulativnim organom pa, da bi zaščitili potrošnike in se borili proti nezakonitim spletnim igram na srečo ter potencialnim kaznivim dejanjem, povezanim z njimi, na ravni EU;
D. whereas the gambling sector is regulated differently in different Member States and this not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to provide lawful gaming services on a cross-border basis, but also for regulators to protect consumers and combat illegal online gambling and potential crime associated with it at EU level,
E. ker prinaša vseevropski pristop k boju proti kaznivim dejanjem in goljufijam, zlasti v zvezi z ohranjanjem celovitosti športa ter varstvom igralcev in potrošnikov, znatno dodano vrednost;
E. whereas the value added by a pan-European approach to combating crime and fraud, in particular when it comes to preserving the integrity of sport and protecting gamblers and consumers, is considerable,
F. ker so bile spletne igre na srečo izvzete iz direktiv o elektronskem poslovanju, o storitvah in o pravicah potrošnikov, čeprav člen 56 PDEU zagotavlja svobodo opravljanja storitev;
F. whereas Article 56 TFEU guarantees the freedom to provide services but whereas, as a consequence of its particular nature, online gambling was exempted from the E-Commerce, Services and Consumer Rights Directives,
G. ker ostaja pravna negotovost v zvezi s številnimi drugimi vprašanji, ki jih je mogoče rešiti le na politični ravni, čeprav je Sodišče razjasnilo številna pomembna pravna vprašanja na področju spletnih iger na srečo v EU; ker so se zaradi te pravne negotovosti znatno povečale razpoložljivost nezakonitih ponudb iger na srečo in z njimi povezane velike nevarnosti;
G. whereas, while the Court of Justice has clarified a number of important legal questions concerning online gambling in the EU, legal uncertainty remains with regard to a number of other questions, which can only be solved at the political level; whereas this legal uncertainty has led to a significant increase in the availability of illegal gambling offers and the high risks associated with them;
H. ker lahko pomenijo spletne igre na srečo, če niso ustrezno pravno urejene, večjo nevarnost zasvojenosti kot običajne igre na srečo v fizičnem svetu, med drugim tudi zato, ker so lažje dostopne in družbenega nadzora nad njimi ni;
H. whereas online gambling, if not properly regulated, may involve a greater risk of addiction than traditional physical, location-based gambling, owing inter alia to increased ease of access and the absence of social control,
I. ker je treba potrošnike poučiti o možni škodljivosti spletnih iger na srečo in jih zaščititi pred nevarnostmi na tem področju, zlasti pred zasvojenostjo, goljufijami, prevarami in mladoletniških igranjem na srečo;
I. whereas consumers must be educated about the potential harm of online gambling and protected against dangers in this area, especially addiction, fraud, scams and underage gambling,
J. ker so igre na srečo pomemben vir prihodkov, ki jih večina držav članic nameni za javno koristne in dobrodelne namene, na primer za šport;
J. whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue, which most Member States channel to publicly beneficial and charitable purposes such as sport,
K. ker je treba brezpogojno zagotoviti celovitost športa, tako da se okrepi boj proti korupciji in vnaprej dogovorjenim izidom tekmovanj;
K. whereas it is essential to ensure the integrity of sport by stepping up the fight against corruption and match fixing,
L. ker je za doseganje teh ciljev nujno uvesti mehanizme za nadzor športnih tekmovanj in finančnih tokov ter skupne nadzorne mehanizme na ravni EU;
L. whereas, in order to achieve these objectives, it is essential to introduce mechanisms for scrutinising sports competitions and financial flows, along with common supervisory mechanisms at the EU level,
1. pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija prevzela pobudo in začela javno posvetovanje v zvezi z zeleno knjigo o spletnih stavah in igrah na srečo, ki bo spodbudilo pragmatičen in stvaren razmislek o prihodnosti te panoge v Evropi;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling, which will facilitate pragmatic and realistic consideration of the future of this sector in Europe;
3. opozarja na vse večji gospodarski pomen panoge spletnih iger na srečo, saj so letni prihodki iz tega vira v letu 2008 presegli 6 milijard EUR, kar pomeni 45 % svetovnega trga; se strinja s Sodiščem Evropske unije, da je to posebna gospodarska dejavnost; opozarja, da je ta rast povzročila tudi višje socialne stroške zaradi kompulzivnega igranja na srečo in nezakonite prakse;
Recalls the growing economic importance of the online gambling industry, the take from which was over EUR 6 billion, or 45% of the world market, in 2008; agrees with the Court of Justice of the European Union that this is an economic activity with specific characteristics; recalls that this growth also entails an increased social cost from compulsive gambling and illegal practices;
(1) usmerjati naravno nagnjenje prebivalstva do igranja iger na srečo z omejevanjem oglaševanja na tisto, ki je nujno potrebno za usmerjanje morebitnih igralcev k zakonitim storitvam, in z zahtevo, da mora vsakršno oglaševanje spletnih iger na srečo spremljati opozorilo o nevarnosti prekomernega ali patološkega igranja na srečo,
(1) channel the natural gaming instinct of the population by restricting advertising to the level that is strictly necessary in order to direct potential gamblers to the legal provision of services, and by requiring all advertising for online gambling to be systematically coupled with a message warning against excessive or pathological gambling,
(2) boriti se proti nezakoniti panogi iger na srečo s krepitvijo tehničnih in pravnih instrumentov za prepoznavanje in sankcioniranje nezakonitih ponudnikov ter s spodbujanjem zakonite ponudbe visoko kakovostnih iger na srečo,
(2) combat the illegal gambling sector by strengthening technical and legal instruments for identifying and sanctioning illegal operators, and by promoting the legal provision of high-quality gambling services,
(3) zagotavljati učinkovito varstvo igralcev ob posebni pozornosti do ranljivih skupin, zlasti mladine,
(3) guarantee effective protection for gamblers, with specific attention to vulnerable groups, in particular young people,
(4) preprečiti nevarnost zasvojenosti z igrami na srečo in
(4) preclude risks of gambling addiction, and
(5) zagotoviti, da se igre na srečo izvajajo zakonito, pošteno, odgovorno in pregledno,
(5) ensure that gambling is proper, fair, responsible and transparent,
(6) zagotoviti, da se spodbudijo posebni ukrepi za zagotavljanje celovitosti športnih tekmovanj,
(6) ensure that specific measures are promoted to guarantee the integrity of sporting competition,
(7) zagotoviti, da se del prihodkov od stav nameni športnim organizacijam in organizacijam na področju konjskih dirk,
(7) ensure that part of the value of bets goes to sports and horse-racing bodies,
(8) zagotavljati, da se znaten del javnih prihodkov iz iger na srečo uporabi za spodbujanje javnih dejavnosti, dejavnosti za skupno dobro ali dobrodelnih dejavnosti in
(8) ensure that a considerable proportion of government revenue from gambling is used for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes, and
5. meni, da lahko taka ureditev zagotovi privlačnost športnih tekmovanj za potrošnike in javnost ter ohrani verodostojnost športnih rezultatov in ugled športnih tekmovanj;
Sees such regulation as having the potential to ensure that sports competitions are attractive to consumers and to the public, that sports results remain credible and that the competitions retain their prestige;
Sodba Sodišča v zadevi C-46/08, Carmen Media, ZOdl.
Underscores the standpoint of the European Court of Justice
2010. , da je internet zgolj kanal za ponudbo iger na srečo z naprednimi tehnologijami, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti za varstvo potrošnikov in ohranjanje javnega reda, čeprav to ne vpliva na pravico držav članic, da same izberejo pristop k ureditvi spletnih iger na srečo ter imajo še vedno možnost, da omejijo ali prepovejo ponudbo nekaterih storitev potrošnikom;
Carmen Media 2010 (C-46/08). whereby the Internet is simply a channel for offering games of chance with sophisticated technologies that can be used to protect consumers and to maintain public order, although Member States’ discretion in determining their own approach to the regulation of online gambling is unaffected thereby and they can still restrict or prohibit the provision of certain services to consumers;
Načelo subsidiarnosti in evropska dodana vrednost
Subsidiarity principle and European added value
8. opozarja, da imajo države članice pravico do pravnega urejanja in nadzora svojih panog iger na srečo v skladu z evropsko zakonodajo s področja notranjega trga ter s svojo običaji in kulturo;
Highlights the fact that Member States have the right to regulate and control their gambling sector in accordance with European internal market legislation and with their traditions and culture;
11. zato zavrača evropski pravni akt o enotni ureditvi celotne panoge iger na srečo, kljub temu pa meni, da bi usklajen evropski pristop v kombinaciji z nacionalno ureditvijo glede na čezmejnost spletnih storitev na srečo na nekaterih področjih prinesel jasno dodano vrednost;
Rejects, accordingly, any European legislative act uniformly regulating the entire gambling sector, but nonetheless takes the view that, in some areas there would be clear added value from a coordinated European approach, in addition to national regulation, given the cross-border nature of online gambling services;
13. poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije v številnih sodbah odločilo, da je dodelitev izključnih pravic enemu samemu ponudniku pod strogim nadzorom javnih organov lahko jamstvo za boljše varstvo potrošnikov pred goljufijami in učinkovitejši boj proti kaznivim dejanjem v panogi spletnih iger na srečo;
Points out that the European Court of Justice has accepted in a number of rulings that granting exclusive rights to a single operator subject to tight public-authority control may be a means of improving protection of consumers against fraud and combating crime in the online gambling sector more effectively;