natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice morajo o osnutkih ukrepov v zvezi s tem obvestiti Komisijo šest mesecev pred njihovim sprejetjem.
Member States should notify the Commission of draft measures in this regard six months before their adoption.
V tem obdobju mora Komisija osnutke ukrepov oceniti in izdati priporočilo.
During that period, the Commission should assess the draft measures and issue a recommendation.
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135 – paragraph 1 – point a
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135 – odstavek 1 – točka d
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) menjava valute
(d) exchange of currency
zagotovitev gotovine;
provision of cash;
zagotovitev gotovine
provision of cash
in transakcij v zvezi z terjatvami
and cash claims transactions
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135 – odstavek 1 – točka e
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135 – paragraph 1 – point e
transakcije, ki zadevajo trgovanje z vrednostnimi papirji
transactions concerning trading in
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135 – odstavek 1 – točka g a (novo)
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135 – odstavek 1a 1a.
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135 – paragraph 1a 1a.
Oprostitev iz
The exemption provided for in
odstavka 1 se uporablja za zagotovitev katerega koli sestavnega elementa zavarovalne ali finančne storitve, ki je ločena celota ter ima posebno in bistveno naravo oproščene storitve.
of paragraph 1 shall apply to the supply of any constituent element of an insurance or financial service, which constitutes a distinct whole and has the specific and essential character of the exempt service.
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 1
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 1
in pozavarovanje
and reinsurance
v primeru nastanka zavarovalnega primera
obliged, in return for a payment, to provide
dolžna v zameno za plačilo zagotoviti odškodnino ali ugodnost, kot to določa obveza;
, in the event of materialisation of a risk, with an indemnity or a benefit as determined by the commitment;
ena ali več oseb
one or more persons is or are
eni ali več drugim osebam
one or more other persons
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 8 – uvodni del
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 8 – introductory part
pomeni zagotovitev instrumentov, ki so namenjeni trgovanju, razen instrumentov, ki ustanavljajo lastninsko pravico na blagu, ali pravic iz člena 15(2), ki imajo finančno vrednost in izražajo eno ali več od naslednjega:
of tradable instruments other than an instrument establishing title to goods or to the rights referred to in Article 15(2), representing financial value and reflecting any one or more of the following:
instrumentov, ki so namenjeni trgovanju, razen instrumentov, ki ustanavljajo lastninsko pravico na blagu, ali pravic iz člena 15(2), ki imajo finančno vrednost in izražajo eno ali več od naslednjega:
of tradable instruments other than an instrument establishing title to goods or to the rights referred to in Article 15(2), representing financial value and reflecting any one or more of the following:
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 8 – točka c
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 8 – point c
(c) lastništvo deležev v kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih
(c) unit ownership in undertakings for collective investment
za vlaganja v vrednostne papirje iz točke (a) ali (b), v druge oproščene finančne instrumente iz točk (a) do (d) člena 135(1) ali
in the securities referred to in points (a) or (b), in other exempted financial instruments referred to in points (a) to (d) of Article 135(1) or
v drugih kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih;
in other undertakings for collective investment;
(c) lastništvo deležev v
(c) unit ownership in
investicijskih skladih iz točke 10 ali
investment funds, as defined in point 10, or in
v kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih v drugih kolektivnih naložbenih podjemih;
undertakings for collective investment in other undertakings for collective investment;
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 8 – točka c a (novo)
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 8 – point c a (new)
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 9
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 9
storitev za pogodbeno stranko, ki jih tudi plača,
to, and remunerated by, a contractual party
neposrednega ali posrednega
, direct or indirect
dejanja posredovanja v zvezi z zavarovalnimi in finančnimi transakcijami iz točk (a) do (e) člena 135(1), ki ga
act of mediation in relation to the insurance or financial transactions referred to in points (a) to (e) of Article 135(1), by
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 10
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 10
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 135a – točka 11
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 135a – point 11
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137 – odstavek 1 – točka a
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137 – paragraph 1 – point a
V členu 137(1) se točka (a) izbriše.
In Article 137(1), point (a) is deleted.
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137a – odstavek 1 1.
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137a – paragraph 1 1.
Od 1. januarja 2012 države članice odobrijo davčnim zavezancem pravico do izbire obdavčitve v zvezi s storitvami iz
From 1 January 2012, Member States shall allow taxable persons a right of option for taxation in respect of the services referred to in
člena 135(1).
of Article 135(1).
Od 1. januarja 2012 države članice odobrijo davčnim zavezancem
From 1 January 2012, Member States shall allow taxable persons
v vsakem posameznem primeru
in each individual case
z eno od storitev
of the services referred to in
člena 135(1)
of Article 135(1)
, ko se storitve opravljajo za druge davčne zavezance, ki imajo sedež v isti državi članici ali drugje v Skupnosti
, where that service is provided to another taxable person established in the same Member State or elsewhere in the Community
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137a – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137a – odstavek 2 2.
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137a – paragraph 2 2.
Dokler Svet ne sprejme takih ukrepov, lahko države članice
So long as the Council has not adopted such measures, Member States may
podrobna pravila o uresničevanju pravice do izbire iz odstavka 1.
the detailed rules governing exercise of the option under paragraph 1.
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137b – točka 1
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137b – point 1
(1) skupina sama
(1) the group itself
in vsi njeni člani imajo
and all its members are
ali stalno prebivališče
or resident
v Skupnosti;
in the Community;
sedež v Skupnosti;
established in the Community;
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137b – točka 3
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137b – point 3
(3) člani skupine opravljajo storitve, oproščene na podlagi
(3) members of the group are supplying services which are exempt under
člena 135(1)(a) do (g),
Article 135(1)(a) to (g)
ali druge storitve, v zvezi s katerimi niso davčni zavezanci;
or other services in respect of which they are not taxable persons;
člena 135(1)(a) do (ga),
Article 135(1)(a) to (ga)
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137b – točka 4
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137b – point 4
samo za svoje člane in
only to its members and
oproščene v skladu s členom 135(1)(a) do (g);
Article 135(1)(a) to (g);
s členom 135(1)(a) do (ga);
Article 135(1)(a) to (ga);
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 137b – točka 5
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 137b – point 5
(5) skupina od svojih članov zahteva samo natančno povračilo njihovega deleža skupnih stroškov
(5) the group claims from its members only the exact reimbursement of their share of the joint expenses
brez kakršnih koli preračunov
, excluding any
transfernih cen za namene neposrednega obdavčenja."
transfer-pricing adjustments made for the purposes of direct taxation.
transfernih cen za namene neposrednega obdavčenja
transfer-pricing adjustments made for the purposes of direct taxation
ne smejo vplivati na izvzetje skupine iz prometnega davka
shall not affect the group's exemption from turnover tax
Direktiva 2006/112/ES Člen 169 – točka c
Directive 2006/112/EC Article 169 – point c
V členu 169 se točka (c) nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 169, point (c) is replaced by the following:
"(c) transakcij, ki so oproščene v skladu s
'(c) transactions which are exempt pursuant to
člena 135(1), če ima prejemnik sedež zunaj Skupnosti ali če so te transakcije neposredno povezane z blagom, namenjenim za izvoz iz Skupnosti."
of Article 135(1), where the customer is established outside the Community or where those transactions relate directly to goods to be exported out of the Community.'
najpozneje do 31. decembra 2007
by 31 December 2009 at the latest
ob zagotavljanju, da bodo končni potrošniki imeli koristi od preoblikovanja veljavnega sporazuma o DDV
while ensuring that end-consumers benefit from the restructuring of the present VAT arrangement
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6 in 39 Pogodbe EU ter členov 13, 17 do 22, 61 do 69, 255 in 286 Pogodbe ES, ki so glavni pravni temelj za razvoj Evropske unije in Skupnosti kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
having regard to Articles 2, 6 and 39 of the EU Treaty and Articles 13, 17 to 22, 61 to 69, 255 and 286 of the EC Treaty, which form the main legal basis for the development of the EU and the Community as an area of freedom, security and justice,
ker je zagotavljanje svobode, varnosti in pravice za svoje državljane prvenstveno pristojnost držav članic; ker mora Unija od začetka veljavnosti Maastrichtske pogodbe in še bolj od začetka veljavnosti Amsterdamske pogodbe prispevati k uresničitvi istih ciljev, pri čemer mora upoštevati pričakovanja državljanov Unije glede zaščite temeljnih pravic in uporabe načel pravne države v Uniji ter lojalnega in učinkovitega sodelovanja med državami članicami,
whereas Member States have prime responsibility for ensuring freedom, security and justice for their citizens; whereas, however, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Maastricht and, even more so, that of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the Union is required to contribute to the achievement of those same objectives, bearing in mind the expectations of citizens of the Union as regards the protection of fundamental rights and the application within the Union of the principles of the rule of law and loyal and effective cooperation between Member States;
ker je ratifikacija Lizbonske pogodbe bistven in nujen predpogoj za to, da Unija postane območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, saj vsebuje temeljne izboljšave glede zakonitosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov EU,
whereas the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon is an essential and urgent precondition for ensuring that the Union is an area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ), as it contains fundamental improvements to the legitimacy and effectiveness of EU action,
ker je bil na pripravljalnem srečanju dne 26. novembra 2007 z nacionalnimi parlamenti in med zadnjo razpravo na plenarnem zasedanju dne 31. januarja 2008 izpostavljen pomen dobre priprave na prehod na nov pravni okvir, ki bo temeljil na ratifikaciji Lizbonske pogodbe z dne 13. decembra 2007, ki bo spremenila Pogodbo EU in uvedla Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije,
whereas the comments made both at the preparatory meeting of 26 November 2007 with the national parliaments and during the most recent debate in plenary on 31 January 2008 underlined the importance of laying thorough groundwork for the transition to the new legal framework that will result from the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007, which will amend the EU Treaty and establish a Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ker pravo območje svobode, varnosti in pravice še zdaleč ni vzpostavljeno ter da so v zvezi s tem še vedno prisotne velike težave in ovire, kar je potrjeno v sporočilu Komisije z dne 2. julija 2008 z naslovom "Poročilo o izvajanju haaškega programa leta 2007 ( KOM(2008)0373 ),
whereas, however, the establishment of a genuine AFSJ is far from having been completed and still faces major difficulties and obstacles, as confirmed in the Communication from the Commission of 2 July 2008 entitled "Report on Implementation of the Hague Programme for 2007" ( COM(2008)0373 ),
še vedno obstaja resno pomanjkanje medsebojnega zaupanja in predvsem solidarnosti med državami članicami, zlasti kar zadeva politiko o zakonitem in nezakonitem priseljevanju ter policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah,
there is still a serious lack of mutual trust and, above all, solidarity between Member States, especially as regards policies on legal and illegal immigration and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters,
te težave vplivajo tudi na prenos maloštevilnih sprejetih ukrepov, saj je bil napredek očitno nezadosten na naslednjih področjih: vizumska politika, izmenjava informacij med organi kazenskega pregona in sodnimi organi, preprečevanje in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, krizno upravljanje znotraj Evropske unije, policijsko in carinsko sodelovanje ter pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah;
these problems also affect the phase of transposition of the few measures adopted since "an insufficient level of achievement was evident in the following areas: Visa Policy, Sharing of Information among Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities, Prevention of and the Fight against Organised Crime, Management of Crises within the European Union, Police and Customs Cooperation and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters",
ker je Parlament podobno kot Svet prepričan, da Unija nima druge izbire, kot da vztraja pri izvajanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, ki zadeva bistvo nacionalnih ustavnih redov, ter da "imajo države članice poseben interes za ohranjanje dialoga med seboj, pa tudi z evropskimi institucijami,
whereas Parliament is convinced, however, like the Council, that the Union has no other choice but to insist on implementing the AFSJ, which touches the core of the national constitutional orders, and that Member States have a special interest in maintaining a dialogue with each other as much as with the European institutions,
ker pa je v tem obdobju tranzicije do zaključka ratifikacije Lizbonske pogodbe pred koncem leta 2009 treba sprejeti nekatere splošne ukrepe, ki bi kljub zgledovanju po Lizbonski pogodbi še vedno lahko bili sprejeti v skladu z veljavnimi pogodbami ter v skladu s členom 18 Dunajske konvencije o pogodbenem pravu in ki bi lahko zmanjšali negativni vpliv omenjenih težav; ker bi šlo predvsem za ukrepe v zvezi z:
whereas, in this transitional phase pending the conclusion of the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, it is necessary to adopt before the end of 2009 certain general measures which, while drawing their inspiration from the Treaty of Lisbon, could still be adopted under the existing Treaties in full compliance with Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and which could reduce the adverse effects of the problems mentioned above; whereas these would include measures to:
upoštevanjem postopkov, struktur in odločitev institucij ter načel in ciljev iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ki je bila razglašena dne 12. decembra 2007 v Strasbourgu
take account of the institutions' procedures, structures and decisions, and of the principles and objectives set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, proclaimed in Strasbourg on 12 December 2007
UL C 303, 14.12.2007, str.
JO C 303, 14.12.2007, p.
spodbujanjem preglednosti pri odločanju na ravni Unije in nacionalni ravni, zlasti v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, v skladu z nedavno sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti glede preglednosti zakonodaje (zadeva Turco
promote decision-making transparency at Union and national level, in particular in connection with the AFSJ, in accordance with the recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) on legislative transparency (Turco case
Sodba z dne 1. julija 2008 v skupni zadevi C 39/05 P in C-52/05 P, Kraljevina Švedska in Maurizio Turco proti Svetu Evropske unije.
Judgment of 1 July 2008 in Joined cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P Kingdom of Sweden and Maurizio Turco v Council of the European Union.
učinkovitim sodelovanjem nacionalnih parlamentov pri vzpostavitvi in izvajanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, vključno glede ocenjevanja teh politik v drugih državah članicah in agencij Evropske unije,
effectively involve national parliaments in the establishment and implementation of the AFSJ, including as regards assessment of these policies in the other Member States and by European Union agencies,
spoštovanjem dejstva, da ima pri sklepanju mednarodnih pogodb pravo Skupnosti prednost pred pravom EU (člen 47 Pogodbe EU), zlasti ko gre za sankcije, ki zadevajo prebivalce tretjih držav ali ko obstaja nevarnost diskriminacije državljanov Unije (odprava vizumov); Parlament bi moral biti sistematično vključen v sklepanje mednarodnih pogodb EU, ki so povezane s pravosodnim in policijskim sodelovanjem v kazenskih zadevah,
ensure respect for the primacy of Community law over EU law (Article 47 of the EU Treaty) in the conclusion of international agreements, especially in the case of sanctions affecting nationals of third countries or where citizens of the Union are liable to be discriminated against (visa waiver); Parliament should systematically be associated with the conclusion by the EU of international agreements relating to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters,
krepitvijo lojalnega sodelovanja in solidarnosti med državami članicami pri izvajanju politik in ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Unija, z okrepitvijo in demokratizacijo mehanizmov medsebojnega ocenjevanja, ki so že bili predvideni pri schengenskem sodelovanju in pri boju proti terorizmu;
strengthen loyal cooperation and solidarity between Member States in implementing policies and measures taken by the Union by strengthening and democratising the mutual assessment mechanisms already provided for as part of Schengen cooperation and in the fight against terrorism,
tesnejšim sodelovanjem v prvem stebru, če bi bilo potrebno soglasje nemogoče doseči (glej razpravo v zvezi s predlogom Komisije z dne 17. julija 2006 za Uredbo Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 2201/2003 glede pristojnosti in o uvedbi pravil v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja v zakonskih sporih ( KOM(2006)0399 )),
initiate enhanced cooperation under the first pillar where the required unanimity is impossible to achieve (see the debate concerning the proposal from the Commission of 17 July 2006 for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 as regards jurisdiction and introducing rules concerning applicable law in matrimonial matters ( COM(2006)0399 )),
preseganjem začetne faze in negotovosti pri pobudah agencij, ki jih je ustanovila Unija, ter sodelovanja med nacionalnimi upravami;
go beyond the as yet embryonic and uncertain nature of initiatives conducted by the agencies set up by the Union and cooperation with national administrations,
izvajanjem prave komunikacijske politike, ki bo državljanom Unije omogočila, da bodo bolje obveščeni o pobudah, ki nastanejo na ravni Unije in nacionalni ravni, ter da bodo poznali odgovorne organe Unije in nacionalne organe, na katere se lahko brez poseganja v pravico dostopa do sodišča obrnejo glede zadev, ki bi lahko vplivale na njihove temeljne pravice,
set up a genuine communication policy enabling citizens of the Union to be better informed about initiatives established at Union and national level and to become familiar with the relevant Union and national authorities which they can contact without prejudice to court action with regard to aspects liable to affect citizens' fundamental rights,
ker je v tem prehodnem obdobju v interesu državljanov Unije nujno treba upoštevati izboljšave, ki jih prinaša Lizbonska pogodba na področju:
whereas, during this transitional period, it is all the more important, in the interests of the citizens of the Union, to take account of the improvements which the Treaty of Lisbon will bring in terms of:
varstva temeljnih pravic, kot so določene v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
the protection of fundamental rights, as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
sodnega nadzora Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, vključno nad akti o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju,
the judicial control exercised by the ECJ, including over legislation pertaining to police and judicial control,
demokratičnega nadzora s širitvijo postopka soodločanja Parlamenta ter pridružitvijo nacionalnih parlamentov k zakonodajnemu postopku Unije in oceni njegovega vpliva, vključno politiko, ki se nanaša na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice,
the democratic control resulting from the extension of codecision by Parliament and from the involvement of national parliaments in the Union's law-making process and in the assessment of its impact, including with regard to AFSJ-related policies
ker v skladu z veljavnimi pogodbami uporaba pravnih sredstev, povezanih z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, s strani državljanov Unije ostaja bolj omejena kot na drugih področjih dejavnosti EU, ker so pooblastila Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti omejena, zlasti na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, ter ker določene države članice še naprej omejujejo dialog med sodišči EU in nacionalnimi sodišči na tem področju; ker naj bi Svet do obdobja po ratifikaciji Lizbonske pogodbe preložil sprejetje vseh ukrepov, ki bi lahko vplivali na temeljne pravice;
whereas, under the existing Treaties, the means of redress for citizens of the Union in relation to AFSJ measures are still more limited than in other areas of EU activity, whereas the ECJ's powers are limited, in particular in the area of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and whereas, in addition, some Member States still restrict dialogue between the EU courts and national courts in this area; whereas the Council should postpone the adoption of any measure which might affect fundamental rights until the Treaty of Lisbon has been ratified,
poziva Evropski svet, Svet in Komisijo:
Calls on the European Council, the Council and the Commission to:
da od zdaj naprej začnejo s postopkom opredelitve prednostnih nalog naslednjega večletnega programa za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v obdobju 2010–2014, na temelju ambicioznega in skladnega pristopa, ki presega uradna razmišljanja posameznih ministrov in se zgleduje po ciljih in načelih iz Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah;
initiate forthwith the process of determining priorities for the forthcoming AFSJ multiannual programme for the period 2010-2014, on the basis of an ambitious and coherent approach, going far beyond ministerial thinking, and drawing its inspiration from the objectives and principles laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union;
da sodelujejo s Parlamentom v dialogu z nacionalnimi parlamenti o prednostnih nalogah za obdobje 2010–2014, pri čemer naj upoštevajo težave, ki so nastale pri izvajanju programov iz Tempereja in Haaga, dejavnosti, ki so se začele v Svetu, ter prve strateške informacije Evropskega sveta v zvezi s priseljevanjem in azilom ter integracijo; ta prva faza dialoga bi se morala zaključiti med letno razpravo Parlamenta glede napredka, doseženega v letu 2008 na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, Komisija pa bi morala po tem pripraviti sporočilo, pri čemer bi novoizvoljeni Parlament in Evropski svet ob pravem času sprejela dokončni program;
join Parliament in its dialogue with national parliaments on the priorities for the period 2010-2014, taking into account the problems encountered in implementing the Tampere and Hague Programmes, the work carried out within the Council and the European Council's initial strategic indications regarding immigration, asylum and integration; with a view to completing this initial phase of dialogue at Parliament's annual debate on the progress made in 2008 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice and with a view to a Commission communication subsequently being issued, on the understanding that it will be for the newly elected Parliament and the European Council to adopt the final programme at the appropriate time;