natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
podpira pobudo, s katero se Unija zavezuje, da bo pripravila naknadno oceno velikih projektov, in določa, katere informacije (enotni in primerljivi podatki) – ki jih zberejo in posredujejo države članice do določenega časovnega roka – so potrebne; meni, da mora biti spremljanje usmerjeno na ta način, saj trenutno ni oprijemljivih dokazov, da so veliki projekti, ki so financirani s sredstvi Skupnosti, uspešni, in da so države članice porabile prejeta sredstva kolikor je le mogoče učinkovito in koristno;
Supports the initiative whereby the European Commission undertakes to draw up the ex post evaluation of major projects and determines what information (uniform and comparable data) – to be gathered and forwarded by the Member States by the stipulated deadline – is needed; is of the opinion that monitoring needs to be focused in this way because there is currently no tangible evidence that major projects financed by Community funding are effective and that the Member States have used the funds received as effectively and productively as possible;
želi pritegniti pozornost na dejstvo, da so trenutno informacije o velikih projektih na voljo samo po odobritvi le-teh e v letnem poročilu Komisije o strukturnih skladih in Kohezijskem skladu; zato poziva Komisijo, da bo njena domača spletna stran omogočila državljanom, da spremljajo napredek vseh velikih projektov;
Points out that, at present, information on major projects is available in the Commission's annual report on the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund only after such projects have been approved; calls, therefore, on the Commission to ensure that its homepage will enable citizens to monitor the status of any major project;
Del III: Posebno poročilo št. 2/2008 o zavezujočih tarifnih informacijah (ZTI)
Part III: Special Report No 2/2008 concerning Binding Tariff Information (BTI)
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej odpravi nerešene težave in pomanjkljivosti, saj lahko povzročijo izgubo dohodka Unije v obliki tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev;
Urges the Commission to endeavour to resolve the outstanding problems and shortcomings as a matter of urgency, since they could result in a loss of revenue for the Union in the form of traditional own resources;
, imetniki ZTI pravno zavezani k predložitvi ZTI, da se bo posodobitev tezavra nadaljevala, in da je na voljo uporabniški vmesnik v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije;
, will make BTI binding on the holder, the work of updating the thesaurus will continue and the user interface is available in all EU official languages;
od Komisije tudi zahteva, da reši spore glede klasifikacije tarif do časovnih rokov, ki so predvideni v zakonodaji Skupnosti in najkasneje v obdobju petih mesecev, in naj glede na morebitno izgubo lastnih sredstev Komisija poveča število osebja, ki se ukvarja z ZTI in klasifikacijo, na 4, in naj zagotovi, da bodo te osebe izvajale tudi več analiz tveganja ter bolj natančno spremljale, ali države članice pravočasno vnašajo podatke v sistem, ter morebitne primere zlorab zaradi prehodnih obdobij in "prostega izbiranja" med ZTI;
Urges the Commission to resolve tariff-classification disputes by the deadlines laid down by Community law and, at the latest, within five months and, in view of the possible loss of own resources, to increase the number of staff working on BTI and classification to four persons and to ensure that those persons also carry out more risk analyses and exercise more stringent scrutiny of Member State contributions to the system, possible abuses of the period-of-grace system and BTI 'shopping';
zahteva, da Komisija do konca leta 2009 obvesti Parlament o vseh pristopih in ukrepih, ki jih je sprejela na podlagi opažanj Računskega sodišča, in o načinih, na katere so bili izvedeni;
Calls on the Commission to provide, by the end of 2009, information on all the initiatives and measures taken on the basis of the ECA's observations, together with details of their implementation;
Del IV: Posebno poročilo št. 3/2008 o Solidarnostnem skladu Evropske unije: kako hiter, učinkovit in fleksibilen je Solidarnostni sklad Evropske unije?
Part IV: Special Report No 3/2008 on the European Union Solidarity Fund: how rapid, efficient and flexible is it?
pozdravlja skupno pozitivno oceno, ki jo je podalo Računsko sodišče o doseženih rezultatih Komisije pri upravljanju Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije;
Welcomes the ECA's globally positive assessment of the results achieved by the Commission in its management of the European Union Solidarity Fund;
ugotavlja, da kritik zaradi "hitrosti" ni mogoče pripisati izključno upravljanju Sklada s strani Komisije, saj so težave zelo pogosto povezane s pomanjkljivostmi pri upravljanju s strani držav članic in kakovostjo informacij, ki jih zagotavlja prosilec;
Notes that responsibility for the issues raised with regard to rapidity may not be attributed to the Commission alone, given that in very large number of cases the problems stem from management shortcomings on the Member States' side and the quality of the information supplied by applicants;
pozdravil predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije ( KOM(2005)0108 ), ki predvideva enostavnejša in jasnejša merila za hitrejše aktiviranje, ter da Svet doslej v tej zadevi še ni dosegel napredka;
Parliament welcomed the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund ( COM(2005)0108 ) setting out simpler and clearer criteria for swifter activation, and that the Council has yet to make any progress on the matter;
Del V: Posebno poročilo št. 4/2008 o izvajanju mlečnih kvot v državah članicah, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile 1. maja 2004
Part V: Special Report No 4/2008 concerning the implementation of milk quotas in the Member States which joined the European Union on 1 May 2004
obžaluje, da morajo nacionalni organi opraviti številne preglede, ki so lahko površinski, kar pa ne omogoča preverjanja verodostojnosti prijavljenih neposrednih prodaj; pozdravlja Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 228/2008 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 228/2008 z dne 13. marca 2008 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 595/2004 glede intenzivnosti kontrole oddaje in neposredne prodaje mleka (UL L 70, 14.3.2008, str.
Deplores the fact that national authorities are obliged to carry out a host of inspections, which are likely to be superficial, thus making it impossible to determine the credibility of direct-sales declarations; welcomes Commission Regulation (EC) No 228/2008 Commission Regulation (EC) No 228/2008 of 13 March 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 595/2004 with regard to intensity of controls on deliveries and direct sales of milk (OJ L 70, 14.3.2008, p.
, ki zmanjšuje na 1 % stopnjo inšpekcijskih pregledov za proizvajalce, katerih proizvodnja je manjša od 5000 kg;
which reduces to 1% the inspection rate for producers whose production is less than 5 000 kg;
meni, da bi morala Komisija, v okviru deljenega upravljanja, še naprej sprejemati vse pobude, ki se potrebujejo za zagotavljanje učinkovitega spremljanja izvajanja dobrega upravljanja režima mlečnih kvot;
Considers that the Commission should, under the shared management arrangements, continue to take all steps necessary in order to ensure effective monitoring of the establishment and management of the milk quotas system;
poziva pristojne nacionalne organe, da pripravijo, na podlagi analize tveganj, program kontrole za vsako 12-mesečno obdobje, in izvedejo kontrole med in po vsakem kvotnem letu, ampak najkasneje 18 mesecev po koncu zadevnega leta;
Calls on the competent national authorities to draw up, on the basis of a risk analysis, an inspection programme for each 12-month period and to carry out checks during and after each quota year, but no later than 18 months after the end of that year;
meni, da bi morala Komisija, zaradi poenostavitve, povabiti nove države članice, da pristopijo k splošnemu načelu, po katerem je treba vso trženo mleko registrirati;
Takes the view that, on order to simplify matters, the Commission should ask the new Member States to adhere to the general principle that all milk marketed must be recorded;
poziva Komisijo, da povabi nove države članice k izboljšanju njihovih podatkovnih zbirk, kot je zahtevalo Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu, in da se izognejo nepotrebnim kontrolam;
Calls on the Commission to ask the new Member States to improve their database record-keeping, as requested by the ECA in its report, and to avoid unnecessary checks;
poziva Komisijo, da še naprej ocenjuje razvoj v sektorju mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, zlasti razvoj, ki je povezan z zadevnimi trgi, razmerami proizvajalcev, in s posledicami za regionalni razvoj, zlasti v poročilih o oceni, ki so predvideni pred 31. decembrom 2010 in pred 31. decembrom 2012 v skladu s političnim sporazumom o pregledu skupne kmetijske politike, ki je bil sklenjen novembra 2008;
Calls on the Commission to continue to assess developments in the dairy sector, in particular those linked to its market, to the situation of producers, and to the implications for regional development, in particular in the assessment reports to be submitted before 31 December 2010 and before 31 December 2012 under the terms of the political agreement on the common agricultural policy "health check" concluded in November 2008;
poziva Komisijo, da sledi vsem priporočilom Računskega sodišča v okviru s tem pregledom, in da razmisli o morebitnih spremembah v okviru skupne tržne ureditve na področju mleka in na področju režima mlečnih kvot, ki se morajo osredotočiti na:
Calls on the Commission to abide by all of the ECA's recommendations in connection with the 'health check' and to consider possible adjustments to the common market organisation for milk and the milk quota scheme, which should focus on:
spremljevalne ukrepe in ukrepe za prehod, ki jih je treba predvideti v regijah, v katerih mali proizvajalci predstavljajo večino;
transitional and accompanying measures to be envisaged in regions where small producers are still very much in the majority;
potrebo, da se proizvajalcem mleka v novih državah članicah zagotovi trden zakonodajni okvir in jasne napovedi, in se jih spodbuja k naložbam, ki so bistvenega pomena za zagotavljanje trajnosti njihove dejavnosti;
the need for milk producers in the new Member States to have a clear regulatory framework and clear prospects encouraging them to make the investments that are vital in order for their activity to remain viable;
Del VI: Posebno poročilo št. 5/2008 o agencijah Evropske unije – doseganje rezultatov
Part VI: Special Report No 5/2008 – The European Union's agencies: Getting results
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča in poziva Komisijo, da upošteva opredeljene pomanjkljivosti iz poročila ter ukrepa v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča;
Welcomes the ECA special report and urges the Commission to note the shortcomings identified in it, as well as to take steps in line with the ECA's recommendations;
zahteva, da Komisija razvije in izvaja splošni sistem za upravljanje za "regulativne" agencije Unije na podlagi izrecnih meril, kot so preglednost, gospodarnost, učinkovitost, uspešnost in izmenjava najboljše prakse; meni, da mora Komisija dejavno komunicirati z agencijami Unije in upravnim odborom agencij pomagati pri izvajanju proračunskega načrtovanja in upravljanja na podlagi dejavnosti (ABB/ABM);
Calls on the Commission to develop and implement a general management system for the EU 'regulatory' agencies, based on explicit criteria, such as transparency, economy, efficiency, effectiveness and exchange of best practices; takes the view that the Commission should be in active communication with the Union agencies and should assist management boards in the implementation of activity-based budgeting and management (ABB/ABM);
poziva Komisijo, da uvede učinkovit sistem za spremljanje za agencije Unije, ki omogoča notranji prenos najboljših praks in metod, ter vsebuje niz splošnih in posebnih kazalnikov za ocenjevanje;
Calls on the Commission to introduce an effective monitoring system for the Union agencies, allowing internal transfer of best practices and methodology and containing a range of both general and specific indicators for evaluation purposes;
poziva Komisijo, da razvije smernice za izboljšanje načrtovanja, spremljanja, poročanja in vrednotenja dejavnosti agencij ter da v praksi dosledno uporablja pojem doseganja rezultatov, ki ga določata Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 in okvirna Finančna uredba za agencije Uredba Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o Finančni uredbi za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str.
Calls on the Commission to develop guidelines for improving the planning, monitoring, reporting on and evaluation of the agencies' activities and fully to implement the concept of 'getting results' established by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 in 2002 and the framework Financial Regulation for the agencies Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
Del VII: Posebno poročilo št. 6/2008 o pomoči Evropske komisije za sanacijo po cunamiju in hurikanu Mitch
Part VII: Special Report No 6/2008 concerning European Commission Rehabilitation Aid following the Tsunami and Hurricane Mitch
poziva Komisijo, da oblikuje vse nujne ugotovitve na podlagi izkušenj po hurikanu Mitch in cunamiju, da se tako v prihodnje izboljša uspešnost; poziva Komisijo, da dejavno sodeluje na mednarodni ravni pri odpravljanju sistemskih pomanjkljivosti glede zmogljivosti mednarodne pomoči;
Calls on the Commission to draw all necessary conclusions from the experiences following Hurricane Mitch and the tsunami in order to improve future performance; urges the Commission to play an active role at international level with a view to remedying systemic weaknesses in international relief capacity;
poziva Komisijo, da v prihodnjih dejavnostih rehabilitacije posebno pozornost nameni naslednjim vprašanjem: zagotavljanju, da sredstva temeljijo na potrebi, da je pomoč osredotočena predvsem na prizadeto prebivalstvo, vključno z revnimi, ženskami in otroki, in da so natančne in točne informacije o rezultatih pomoči na voljo tako davkoplačevalcem v državah donatorkah kot prizadetemu prebivalstvu;
Calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the following issues in future rehabilitation actions: ensuring that funding is needs-based, that the affected population – including the poor, women and children – is at the centre of the aid measures and that detailed and accurate information about the outcomes of assistance is available to both taxpayers in donor countries and the affected populations;
poziva vrhovne revizijske institucije in Evropsko računsko sodišče, da okrepijo sodelovanje pri preiskovanju, revizijah in ocenjevanju uporabe sredstev, ki so namenjena za pomoč ob naravnih nesrečah;
Calls on the supreme audit institutions and the ECA to cooperate more closely in investigating, auditing and evaluating the use of disaster-related relief funds;
poziva Komisijo, da pregleda svoj seznam nevladnih organizacij, da tako izključi nevladne organizacije, ki ne delujejo z dobrim namenom, in opredeli politiko nakupa, ki bi preprečevala nezakonite prisvojitve sredstev v takšnih nevladnih organizacijah;
Calls on the Commission to review its list of NGOs in order to exclude non-bona fide NGOs, and to lay down procurement policies that prevent misappropriation of donated funds by such NGOs;
prav tako poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi ustrezno prepoznavnost pomoči Unije brez ogrožanja splošne učinkovitosti in ciljev pravičnosti;
Calls, further, on the Commission to give Union aid a sufficiently high profile without, in so doing, jeopardising overall efficiency and equity objectives;
poziva Združene narode, Rdeči križ, Rdeči polmesec in vse druge donatorje, da se dogovorijo o celovitem okviru nadzora in revizije za:
Calls on the United Nations, the Red Cross/Red Crescent and all other donors to agree upon a comprehensive control and audit framework in order to:
okrepitev in izboljšanje splošnega nadzora nad zbranimi sredstvi,
step up and improve overall control of donated funds;
odpravo podvajanja ali drobitve nadzora ter zmanjšanje stroškov nadzora;
eliminate duplication and/or fragmentation of checks and reduce their cost;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija sprejela priporočila Računskega sodišča in tudi določila najzgodnejši datum za njihovo izvajanje;
Expects the Commission not only to accept the ECA's recommendations but also to indicate the earliest date for their implementation;
meni, da je bistveno, da Komisija v primeru humanitarne pomoči spoštuje merila učinkovitosti pomoči, kot jih zagotavlja Pariška deklaracija o učinkovitosti pomoči;
Considers, moreover, that in connection with humanitarian aid it is essential for the Commission to assert the criteria governing aid effectiveness as enshrined in the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness;
poziva Komisijo, da določi izvedljiv in dejanski rok za razpoložljivost sredstev za spodbudo pravočasnega izvajanja dogovorjenih projektov v državah prejemnicah;
Calls on the Commission to set a realistic and firm deadline for funds to be made available, in order to encourage the recipient countries to implement the agreed projects in a timely manner;
meni, da se humanitarna pomoč v primeru naravnih nesreč dodeli ne glede na politične razmere; vendar meni, da mora Komisija od držav prejemnic zahtevati, da
Considers that, in the event of natural disasters, humanitarian aid should be provided with no political strings attached; takes the view that the Commission should nonetheless require recipient countries to ensure:
dostop do žrtev ni omejen,
unrestricted access to victims;
je pomoč oproščena vseh davkov, carine ali vseh drugih oblik davčnih obremenitev,
that the assistance is not subject to taxation, customs duty or any other form of fiscal burden;
za mednarodno osebje iz zadevnih agencij za pomoč ni zamude ali zavrnitve pri izdaji vizumov,
that there will be no delay in granting, and no refusal to grant, visas to international staff working for relevant aid agencies;
upravičencem ni treba plačati podarjenega blaga in storitev (ali bodo takšni dohodki v celoti reciklirani za obnovo);
that beneficiaries will not be required to pay for the donated goods and services (or that all such revenue will be channelled into reconstruction operations);
poziva Komisijo, da v primeru vsake kršitve navedenih načel obravnava začasno ustavitev pomoči;
Calls on the Commission to consider suspending aid should any of the above principles be violated;
Del VIII: Posebno poročilo št. 7/2008 o programu Inteligentna energija (IEE) 2003–2006
Part VIII: Special Report No 7/2008 on Intelligent Energy 2003-2006
pozdravlja veliko delo Računskega sodišča in njegove ugotovitve, ki vsebujejo določeno količino pohvale in tudi kritike glede upravljanja programa IEE 2003–2006 s strani Komisije in Izvajalske agencije za inteligentno energijo; ceni tesno in v prihodnost usmerjeno sodelovanje Agencije in Računskega sodišča s Parlamentom;
Welcomes the serious work carried out by the ECA and its findings, which contain a certain amount of praise but also criticisms regarding the management by the Commission and the Intelligent Energy Executive Agency of the IEE 2003-2006 programme; applauds the close cooperation between the Agency, the ECA and Parliament and the future-oriented cooperation of the Agency;
iz analize Računskega sodišča sklepa, da so stroški, ki jih nosijo upravičenci (za pripravo predlogov in poročil) precej visoki, in čeprav razume, da so drugačni od izključno upravnih stroškov, se zavzema za njihovo upoštevanje in znižanje v skladu z načeli boljše ureditve;
Concludes from the ECA's analysis that costs borne by beneficiaries (in preparing proposals and reporting) are rather high and, although it understands that those costs are different from purely administrative costs, advocates that they should also be taken into account and reduced in line with the principles of better regulation;
meni, da so ugotovitve Računskega sodišča lahko koristne tudi v primeru drugih izvajalskih agencij; z veseljem pričakuje prihodnje posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča o izvajalskih agencijah;
Considers that the ECA's findings might also be useful in the case of other executive agencies; looks forward to receiving the forthcoming ECA Special Report on executive agencies;
obžaluje dejstvo, da so nove države članice pri projektih ali študijah, povezanih s programom in tudi v primeru lokalnih agencijah za energijo, le malo sodelovale; priznava pa, da se ta položaj lahko delno pojasni s tem, da se je program pred pristopom desetih novih držav članic že začel izvajati; zahteva, da Komisija nadaljuje dejavno politiko dajanja prednosti ustanavljanju agencij za energijo v novih državah članicah, da bi prišlo do uravnotežene porazdelitve na celotnem ozemlju Unije;
Deplores the fact that, in the case of projects or studies related to the programme, as well as in the case of local energy agencies, new Member States were hardly involved; accepts however that this situation can in part be explained by the fact that the programme had already started before the accession of EU-10; requests that the Commission actively pursue its policy of giving priority to the creation of energy agencies in the new Member States in order to arrive at a well-balanced distribution across the whole Union;
Del IX: Posebno poročilo št. 8/2008 – Ali je navzkrižna skladnost uspešna politika?
Part IX: Special Report No 8/2008 - Is cross-compliance an effective policy?
meni, da je treba cilje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete (UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
Considers that the objectives of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers (OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p.
razviti na način, da postanejo "SMART" (specifični, merljivi, dosegljivi, relevantni in časovno določeni) in jih urediti v logični hierarhiji; meni, da morajo države članice na tej osnovi opredeliti preverljive zahteve in standarde na ravni gospodinjstev;
should be developed in a "SMART" (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant and Timed) manner and organised in a logical hierarchy; on this basis, Member States should define verifiable requirements and standards at farm level;
meni, da je treba navzkrižno skladnost poenostaviti z omejitvijo na osnovne elemente kmetijskih dejavnosti, kjer se izboljšave zdijo potrebne, in določiti pričakovane rezultate, zahteve in standarde;
Considers that the cross-compliance framework should be simplified by limiting it to the principal elements of farming activities where improvements are sought and by specifying the expected results, requirements and standards;
poziva Komisijo, naj določi jasno ločnico med navzkrižno skladnostjo in kmetijskim okoljem; tudi za navzkrižno skladnost morajo veljati elementi politike razvoja podeželja, kot je obveznost za določitev preverljivih standardov;
Invites the Commission to draw a clear distinction between cross-compliance and agri-environment; notes that elements of rural development policy, such as the approval of standards by the Commission and the obligation to lay down verifiable standards, should also apply to cross-compliance;