natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva vlado ZDA, naj omogoči neoviran dostop do zapornikov v zalivu Guantanamo, tako organom ZN kot mednarodnim organizacijam za človekove pravice; ugotavlja, da je Mednarodni odbor Rdečega križa edina mednarodna organizacija, ki ji je bil omogočen uraden dostop do zapornikov;
Calls on the US Government to grant unimpeded access to the detainees at Guantánamo Bay for the respective UN bodies and international human rights organisations; notes that the International Committee of the Red Cross has been the only international organisation to have official access to the detainees;
meni, da izboljšanje pogojev v zaporu ne rešuje pravega problema, to je, da so resnično zaskrbljujoče kršitev pravne države, mednarodnega prava in standardov človekovih pravic;
Takes the view that improvements in detention conditions do not tackle the real problem, which is that a violation of the rule of law, international law and human rights standards is the real concern;
obžaluje očitne namene Ministrstva za obrambo ZDA, da se v uredbah o ravnanju z zaporniki odstrani vrstico, ki vsebuje prepoved ponižujočega ravnanja in da se iz pravilnika vojske ZDA za zasliševanja črta izrecno sklicevanje na Ženevske konvencije in na Konvencijo ZN proti mučenju;
Regrets the apparent plans in the US Defence Department to delete a line in the regulations for the treatment of detainees that prohibits humiliating treatment and to delete the explicit reference to the Geneva Conventions and UNCAT in the US army's rule book for interrogations;
ugotavlja, da ZDA opredeljujejo boj proti terorističnemu nasilju kot "vojno", vendar zapornikom ne priznavajo pravic po Ženevskih konvencijah; meni, da je kljub posebni naravi boja proti terorizmu treba uporabiti mednarodno pravo;
Notes that the USA defines the fight against terror as 'war', yet does not acknowledge the rights of detainees, which are based upon the Geneva Conventions; takes the view that, despite the particular nature of the fight against terror, international law must be applied;
ugotavlja, da gradnja novega tabora 6, ki naj bi ga odprli avgusta 2006 in bo opremljen z najsodobnejšo opremo, vendar ne bo imel oken, kaže na to, da zapor Guantanamo še ne bo tako kmalu zaprt;
Notes that the construction of the new camp 6, which is to be opened in August 2006 and will feature the most modern equipment but no windows, does not indicate the likelihood of an early closure of the site;
10 poziva oblasti ZDA, naj zagotovijo takojšnjo, temeljito in neodvisno preiskavo vseh trditev o mučenju ali drugih vrstah slabega ravnanja, v katere je vpleteno osebje ZDA, in da se storilcem sodi;
10 Calls on the US authorities to ensure that all allegations of torture and other ill-treatment involving US personnel are subject to prompt, thorough and credible investigation and trial;
poziva vlado ZDA, naj pojasni, ali so bili mladoletniki zaprti v Guantanamu ALI če so morda še vedno tam zaprti v nasprotju s Konvencijo ZN o pravicah otroka;
Calls on the US Government to clarify whether minors have been or are still held in Guantánamo in contravention of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;
po nasvetu delegacije poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, ki je pred kratkim obiskala Guantanamo, predlaga, naj se v Guantanamo pošlje delegacijo ad hoc, ko se bo Parlamentu to zdelo potrebno in ustrezno;
Suggests, following the advice of the delegation of Members of the European Parliament that recently visited Guantánamo, that an ad hoc delegation be sent to Guantánamo when Parliament considers it necessary and appropriate;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o odločitvah Odbora za peticije v parlamentarnem letu marec 2004 – december 2005 ( 2005/2135(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the parliamentary year March 2004 - December 2005 ( 2005/2135(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o odločitvah Odbora za peticije,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz aprila 1989 o okrepitvi pravice do peticije UL C 120, 12.4.1989, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of April 1989 on strengthening the right of petition OJ C 120, 12.4.1989, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0178/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0178/2006 ),
ker je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, ki je neločljivo povezana z državljanstvom Evropske unije,
whereas the right to petition is a fundamental right inextricably linked with citizenship of the European Union,
ker je pravica do peticije od leta 1992 zapisana v Pogodbi ES in jo potrjujeta člen 44 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in člen 191 Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas the right to petition has been enshrined in the EC Treaty since 1992 and is confirmed in the Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,
ker so Parlament, Svet in Komisija uradno potrdili to pravico in zagotovili njeno spoštovanje v vseh institucijah,
whereas Parliament, the Council and the Commission have formally confirmed the right to petition and have provided a guarantee regarding inter-institutional follow-up on petitions,
ker je izvajanje te pravice pomembno zlasti za državljane, vendar tudi za evropske institucije, saj jim omogoča neposreden vir informacij o vprašanjih in težavah, s katerimi se pri uporabi zakonodaje EU srečujejo državljani,
whereas the exercise of this right is important for EU citizens in particular, but also for the European institutions, because it allows them to benefit from a direct source of information regarding the concerns and difficulties encountered by ordinary citizens following the application of EU legislation,
ker so peticije sredstvo, s katerim lahko Parlament izboljša politični nadzor nad delom EU ter nad prenosom in izvajanjem politik EU s strani evropskih, nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti,
whereas Parliament regards petitions as a means by which it may improve its political oversight and control over the actions of the EU and the way in which the EU's policies are transposed and implemented by EU, national, regional and local authorities,
ker so po širitvi Evropske unije maja 2004 državljani desetih novih držav članic pridobili pravico do naslavljanja peticij na Evropski parlament v svojem jeziku in je bil potreben velik logistični napor, da se jim zagotovi izvrševanje te pravice,
whereas, following enlargement of the EU in May 2004, citizens from ten new Member States acquired the right to petition Parliament in their national languages and a considerable logistical effort has been necessary to enable them to benefit from that right,
ker je treba neprestano zagotavljati, da so državljani EU ustrezno obveščeni o svoji legitimni pravici do naslavljanja peticij na Parlament o vprašanjih, ki zadevajo področja delovanja Evropske unije,
whereas there is always a need to ensure that EU citizens are properly informed of their legitimate right to petition Parliament about matters of concern falling within the fields of activity of the EU,
ker je skoraj tretjina peticij, naslovljenih na Parlament, označenih za nesprejemljive, kar je delno posledica nezadostnih informacij o različnih pristojnostih Parlamenta, Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ter o različnih pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo,
whereas almost one-third of the petitions received by Parliament are declared inadmissible, partly as a result of insufficient information about the different competences of, respectively, Parliament, the European Ombudsman, the European Court of Human Rights, and the various national means of redress available,
ker je Parlament izboljšal postopek obravnave peticij, da bi bil ta učinkovitejši in preglednejši, vendar ugotavlja, da bi se lahko izboljšalo vključevanje in poenotenje upravnih struktur, pristojnih za peticije, in še zlasti nadaljnje zagotavljanje uravnoteženo in pravično obravnavanje vlagateljev peticij kot tudi zagotavljanje zaupnosti v postopku, kadar vlagatelji peticij to zahtevajo,
whereas Parliament has improved the procedure for examining petitions in order to be able to deal with petitions more effectively and transparently, but considers that more could be done to integrate and consolidate administrative structures with responsibility for the petitions process, in particular to further ensure a balanced and just treatment of petitioners, as well as to ensure the confidentiality of the process when requested by petitioners,
ker sodelovanje med Parlamentom, Varuhom človekovih pravic in Komisijo ostaja pogoj, ko gre za obravnavo vprašanj, ki jih s peticijami in pritožbami sprožijo državljani, in ker bi s poenostavljanjem postopkov med temi tremi organi ti postali še učinkovitejši, zlasti z združevanjem obravnav peticij in pritožb, ki so vložene o isti zadevi,
whereas cooperation between Parliament, the Ombudsman and the Commission remains a prerequisite when they address the matters raised by citizens in their petitions and their complaints, and some streamlining of procedures between the three bodies, such as combining investigations with the petitions procedure when complaints and petitions are tabled on the same subject, might bring about greater efficiency,
ker ima po členu 230 Pogodbe ES Parlament pravico, da se obrne na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, in ima zato na voljo tako pravna kot politična sredstva za učinkovitejši odgovor na legitimna vprašanja državljanov;
whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice of the European Communities under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission, and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
ker je Parlament kljub vsemu vedno spodbujal lojalno sodelovanje, predvsem s Komisijo kot varuhom pogodb, kot učinkovito sredstvo za odpravo težav, zaradi katerih se državljani na Parlament obračajo za pomoč,
whereas Parliament, nevertheless, has constantly promoted loyal co-operation, notably with the Commission, as the guardian of the Treaties, as an effective means of remedying problems that have led citizens to seek its assistance,
ker v skladu z Okvirnim sporazumom o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 26. maja 2005 UL C 117 E, 18.5.2006, str.
whereas, according to the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission of 26 May 2005 OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p.
Komisija ne objavi nobene zakonodajne ali pomembne pobude oziroma nobenega pomembnega sklepa, preden o tem v pisni obliki ne obvesti Evropskega parlamenta,
, "the Commission shall not make public any legislative proposal or any significant initiative or decision before notifying Parliament thereof in writing",
ker morajo države članice in Svet državljanom EU posebej zagotoviti, da se evropska zakonodaja spoštuje in da jo nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne oblasti kot tudi njim podrejene institucije ustrezno izvajajo,
whereas the Member States and the Council have a particular duty to guarantee to EU citizens that EU legislation is observed and properly applied by national, regional and local administrations, including by agencies acting under their authority,
ker je treba ugotoviti, da državljani EU seveda niso zadovoljni z rezultati vseh vloženih peticij, ki so bile označene za sprejemljive in obravnavane, vendar razumno razmerje peticij vendarle prispeva k rešitvi določenih težav ali izpostavlja določene bojazni, ki utegnejo kasneje Parlamentu služiti pri pogajanju o novi zakonodaji Skupnosti,
whereas it must be recorded that, naturally, not all admissible petitions received and investigated provide EU citizens with satisfaction, but that a reasonable proportion of petitions do lead to the resolution of a particular problem, or highlight a particular concern which may later serve Parliament when negotiating new Community legislation,
potrjuje ključno vlogo Odbora za peticije pri vzpostavitvi stika z državljani EU in krepitvi demokratične legitimnosti in odgovornosti pri postopkih odločanja v EU v očeh evropske javnosti;
Reaffirms the vital role of its Committee on Petitions in reconnecting with the citizens of the EU, and in reinforcing the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the EU decision-making process in the eyes of European public opinion;
opozarja, da evropske institucije s pomočjo peticij postanejo pozorne na to, kaj posamezni državljani pričakujejo od politik EU in v kakšnem obsegu se ta pričakovanja uresničijo;
Recalls that petitions also alert the EU institutions to what individual citizens expect of EU policies and the extent to which those expectations are fulfilled;
meni, da je Odbor za peticije pomemben forum, kjer lahko državljani izražajo mnenja o evropskem pravu in politikah, s čimer prispevajo k večjemu demokratičnemu nadzoru nad zakonodajo Skupnosti in njenim izvajanjem na ravni EU ter na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Believes that its Committee on Petitions offers citizens an important conduit for providing their feedback concerning EU acts and policies, thus contributing to a strengthening of democratic control over Community legislation and its implementation at EU, national, regional and local levels;
poudarja, da postopek vlaganja peticij Parlamentu omogoča, da oceni in po potrebi ukrepa pri reševanju dvoumnosti političnih ciljev EU, reševanju vrzeli ali nepravilnem izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti v državah članicah;
Emphasises the fact that the petitions process offers Parliament the possibility to assess and, when necessary, to act in order to overcome ambiguities in the political objectives of the EU, as well as loopholes in, or the misapplication of, Community legislation by Member States;
poudarja pomembno vlogo Komisije pri zagotavljanju predhodnih analiz peticij, kar Odboru pomaga pri iskanju ustrezne rešitve za bojazni in težave, s katerimi se v vsakodnevnem življenju srečujejo državljani;
Underlines the significant role played by the Commission in providing preliminary analyses of petitions which helps the Committee to find appropriate solutions to the concerns and problems with which citizens are confronted during their everyday lives;
poudarja, da je poglobljeno sodelovanje med Parlamentom, Varuhom človekovih pravic in Komisijo koristno za obe strani pri izpolnjevanju skupnih ciljev, to je izboljšanje evropske uprave kot tudi kakovosti zakonodaje, ki bi bila državljanom bližja; poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti skupna pravila ravnanja za vse institucije Skupnosti, ki bodo v skladu s kodeksom dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je sestavil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in odobril Evropski parlament;
Stresses that further cooperation between Parliament, the Ombudsman and the Commission is mutually beneficial in fulfilling their common objectives to improve EU administration and developing better quality and more citizen-inspired legislation; emphasises the fact that common rules of conduct for all Community institutions must be established along the lines of the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour drawn up by the European Ombudsman and endorsed by Parliament;
izraža zaskrbljenost in začudenje glede dejstva, da 22. letno poročilo Komisije o nadzoru nad izvajanjem zakonodaje Skupnosti (2004) ( KOM(2005)0570 ) ne priznava pomembne vloge postopkov vlaganja peticij, ki jo imajo ti pri ugotavljanju kršitev, saj se glavno besedilo ne sklicuje na peticije, temveč so omenjene le v tabeli Priloge 1;
Expresses its concern and surprise that, in this context, the Commission's 22nd annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2004) ( COM(2005)0570 ) fails to recognise the important role of the petitions procedure in identifying infringements because there is no reference to petitions in the body of the report, the only reference being in a table of Annex 1;
meni, da bi Komisija morala sporočati odločitve o uvedbi postopkov o ugotavljanju kršitev pred vročitvijo formalnega opomina, predvsem ko je bila na Parlament vložena peticija v zvezi s tem vprašanjem;
Considers that the Commission should notify decisions on opening infringement proceedings before the service of a letter of formal notice, in particular when Parliament has been petitioned on the issue in question;
priporoča, naj se vsakič, ko državljani naslovijo peticijo z isto vsebino na Parlament in pritožbo na Komisijo, pri obravnavi te teme oba postopka ustrezno uskladi, saj je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, zagotovljena v Pogodbi, in ker Parlament nudi pregleden okvir za razprave, kar je pogoj za večjo odprtost in javno odgovornost;
Recommends that, whenever citizens file, on the same subject, both a petition to Parliament and a complaint to the Commission, both procedures should be properly coordinated when dealing with the issues raised, given that the right to petition is a fundamental right, safeguarded by the Treaty, and because Parliament provides a transparent framework for debates, which is a prerequisite for improved openness and enhanced public accountability;
izraža vse večjo zaskrbljenost nad neutemeljenim in pretiranim časovnim razponom Komisije, ki pogosto traja tudi več let, pri obravnavi in zaključevanju postopkov za odkrivanje kršitev po tem, ko jih vendarle sproži, in izraža nezadovoljstvo, da države članice odločitev Sodišča pogostokrat ne upoštevajo; meni, da to ogroža verodostojnost oblikovanja in doslednega izvajanja zakonodaje ES ter povzroča nezaupanje v cilje EU;
Expresses its growing concern at the unreasonable and excessive amount of time - often spanning several years - which the Commission takes to pursue and conclude infringement proceedings after they are eventually launched, and its dissatisfaction with the frequent examples of Member States' non-compliance with decisions of the Court of Justice; considers that this undermines the credibility of the formulation and coherent application of EC law, and that it brings discredit on the objectives of the EU;
nadalje opozarja na pomen hitre izvršitve sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v postopkih ugotavljanja kršitev v državah članicah; pozdravlja bolj ostro politiko glede vlaganja tožb zoper države članice pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, da se naloži plačilo pavšalnih zneskov in denarnih kazni, ki jo je uvedla Komisija decembra 2005; meni, da je treba to politiko aktivno izvajati, da se zagotovi avtoriteto EU in da se izpolni legitimna pričakovanja evropskih državljanov;
Furthermore draws attention to the importance of the quick implementation by Member States of judgments of the Court of Justice in infringement proceedings; welcomes the stronger policy adopted by the Commission in December 2005 on bringing Member States before the Court of Justice in order that lump sums and penalty payments be imposed; believes that this policy needs to be applied with vigour to ensure EU authority and to meet the legitimate expectations of EU citizens;
meni, da bi morali pristojni parlamentarni odbori nadalje proučiti te nesprejemljive razmere in pripraviti priporočila o jasnejši vključenosti Parlamenta v postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev in o učinkovitejših pravnih sredstvih, ki so na voljo državljanom;
Believes that this unacceptable situation should be further investigated by the competent committees of Parliament with a view to recommendations being made about more distinct parliamentary involvement in infringement proceedings and a more effective means of redress for citizens;
poudarja pomen informacijskih kampanj, ki jih vodijo države, da bi omogočile državljanom boljše poznavanje zakonodaje Skupnosti, njenih politik in ciljev; meni, da bi se s takimi kampanjami lahko zmanjšalo število neutemeljenih peticij in pritožb in hkrati izboljšala sposobnost Parlamenta in Komisije za zagotavljanje pravilnega izvajanja zakonodaje in politik EU v sodelovanju z državami članicami;
Underlines the importance of nationally-led information campaigns to facilitate a better knowledge of the substance of EC legislation, policies and objectives by citizens; which could also help to reduce the number of unfounded petitions and complaints while, at the same time, improve the ability of Parliament and the Commission to ensure the correct application of EU law and policy in cooperation with the Member States;
opozarja na ključno vlogo, ki jo imajo države članice pri pravilnem izvrševanju zakonodaje ES in pri povečevanju pomena, ki ga EU ima pri državljanih; poudarja potrebo po bolj usklajenem sodelovanju predstavnikov držav članic in njihovih parlamentov v razpravah Odbora za peticije;
Recalls the key role that Member States play in correctly implementing the EC legislation and in making the EU more relevant to citizens; stresses the need for a better coordinated participation of the representatives of the Member States and their parliaments in the debates of the Committee on Petitions;
spodbuja misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v skladu s členom 192 Poslovnika, ki se jih z jasno določenimi cilji in nameni pošlje v različne države članice EU, da bi preučile vprašanja vlagateljev peticij, in še naprej podpira te misije, saj omogočajo jasnejšo sliko pogosto zapletenih vprašanj na mestu samem in prispevajo k dvigu ozaveščenosti pristojnih oblasti, kar spodbuja iskanje učinkovitih in pragmatičnih rešitev, ki so v interesu državljanov;
Encourages fact-finding missions pursuant to Rule 192 of its Rules of Procedure, with clear aims and objectives, which are occasionally despatched to various Member States of the EU to investigate issues raised by petitioners, and continues to support such missions when the situation fully warrants it, as they offer a clearer view of often complex problems on the ground and help raise awareness among the competent authorities, which also increases the pressure to find effective and pragmatic solutions in the interests of citizens;
poziva, naj se potrjena poročila misij predložijo v vednost predsedstvu Parlamenta, in kjer je to potrebno, ostalim pristojnim odborom;
Calls for the reports that are approved as a result of such missions to be forwarded to the Bureau of Parliament and, where required, to other committees with an interest in the issues raised, for their information;
poudarja, da je pogosto potrebno tesnejše sodelovanje Sveta kot institucije pri dejavnostih Odbora za peticije, in spodbuja sodelovanje Sveta pri zasedanjih Odbora na ustrezni stopnji, kot to navaja Medinstitucionalni sporazum o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, ki so ga 16. decembra 2003 sprejeli Svet, Evropski parlament in Komisija UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
Emphasises the frequent need for a greater involvement of the Council, as an institution, in the Committee's activities and encourages its participation at the meetings of the Committee at the appropriate level, as stated in the Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-making, adopted on 16 December 2003 by the Council, the European Parliament and the Commission OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
znova opozarja na predlog, na podlagi katerega naj bi Svet imenoval visokega uradnika za koordinacijo vprašanj, povezanih s peticijami, saj se lahko veliko peticij dotika občutljivih političnih vprašanj v zvezi s prenosom zakonodaje Skupnosti in ciljev EU v državah članicah;
Reiterates the proposal for the Council to designate a senior official to coordinate matters related to petitions, as many of the petitions may touch upon sensitive political issues related to the transposition by Member States of EC legislation and the EU's objectives;