natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije UL L 283, 31.10.2003, str.
having regard to Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2004/75/ES (UL L 157, 30.4.2004, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/75/EC (OJ L 157, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o deležu obnovljivih virov energije v EU ( KOM(2004)0366 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the share of renewable energy in the EU ( COM(2004)0366 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu na temo "Gradimo našo skupno prihodnost – Politični izzivi in proračunska sredstva razširjene Unije za obdobje 2007-2013" ( KOM(2004)0101 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Building our common Future - Policy challenges and Budgetary means of the Enlarged Union 2007-2013" ( COM(2004)0101 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru za vključevanje okoljskih vidikov v evropsko standardizacijo ( KOM(2004)0130 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee on Integration of Environmental Aspects into European Standardisation ( COM(2004)0130 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije – Priročnik za okoljska javna naročila ( SEK(2004)1050 ),
having regard to the Commission working document - A handbook on environmental public procurement ( SEC(2004)1050 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0141/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0141/2005 ),
ker je trajnostni razvoj – razvoj, ki izpolnjuje potrebe sedanjih generacij in hkrati upošteva potrebe prihodnjih generacij – jasen cilj Evropske unije,
whereas sustainable development – development that meets the needs of the present without compromising those of future generations – is a clear objective of the European Union,
ker trajnostni razvoj ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Göteborgu temelji na treh stebrih, in sicer na varstvu okolja, gospodarskem razvoju in socialni koheziji,
whereas, according to the conclusions of the Göteborg European Council, sustainable development is based on three pillars, namely environmental protection, economic development and social cohesion,
ker se trajnostni razvoj ne more doseči brez razvoja nove okoljske tehnologije in novosti,
whereas sustainable development cannot be achieved without the development of new environmental technology and innovations,
ker Lizbonska strategija – narediti EU najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu s trajno gospodarsko rastjo, več in boljšimi delovnimi mesti ter večjo socialno kohezijo – v svojem prizadevanju za dosego trajnostnega razvoja potrebuje cilje na področju gospodarske, socialne in okoljske politike, ki so združljivi in zmožni zagotavljati večjo gospodarsko rast,
whereas in order to ensure sustainable development, the Lisbon strategy - to make the European Union the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion - needs goals for economic, social and environmental policy which are mutually consistent as well as capable of delivering enhanced economic growth,
ker je v zvezi s tem bistveno krepiti in izrabljati pozitivne učinke sinergije varovanja okolja in konkurenčnosti ter ločiti gospodarsko rast od slabšanja stanja okolja; in ker so pomembno sredstvo na poti do cilja okoljske tehnologije (vse tehnologije, katerih uporaba je znatno manj škodljiva v zvezi s celotnim vplivom na okolje od vseh možnih alternativ),
whereas it is of vital importance in this context to reinforce and exploit the positive synergies between environmental protection and competitiveness and to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation; and whereas environmental technologies (all technologies whose use is significantly less harmful in terms of its overall environmental impact than relevant alternatives) are an important means of achieving this,
ker bo le zadostno povpraševanje po okoljskih tehnologijah pospešilo prihod inovacij na trg (raziskave, razvoj izdelkov, proizvodnja, predstavitev na trgu),
whereas only sufficient demand for environmental technologies will speed up the process of getting innovations to the market (from research, product development, production, launch to market introduction),
ker mora Evropska unija imeti okoljsko politiko, ki je dovolj ambiciozna, da ustvarja povpraševanje po okoljskih tehnologijah, z jasno opredeljenimi in ambicioznimi okoljskimi cilji, dogovorjenimi okoljskimi kazalci za merjenje okoljske obremenitve, internalizacijo okoljskih (eksternih) stroškov in ugodnostmi za tiste, ki prevzemajo vodilno vlogo, ne pa za tiste, ki ostajajo v ozadju,
whereas the European Union must have an environmental policy which is ambitious enough to create demand for environmental technologies, with clear and ambitious environmental targets, agreed environmental indicators for measuring the environmental burden, internalisation of environmental (external) costs and rewards to leaders rather than the laggards,
ker je povpraševanje strank po okoljskih tehnologijah pomembno; ker mora družba sprejeti veliko odgovornost za oblikovanje primernih okvirjev za hiter razvoj takih tehnologij,
whereas the role of customer demand for environmental technologies is important; whereas, however, society at large must assume a major responsibility for creating the appropriate frameworks for the speedy development of such technologies,
ker akcijski načrt okoljskih tehnologij Evropske komisije (ANOT) ne vključuje mehanizmov, primernih za širjenje znanja, prenose tehnologij, novosti in razvoj,
whereas the Commission's Environmental Technologies Action Plan (ETAP) does not include suitable mechanisms for the diffusion of knowledge, technology transfers, innovation and development;
ker je finančna podpora pomembna tako za raziskave in razvoj kot tudi za razvoj izdelka do faze, ko ga je možno uvesti na trg, je treba okrepiti prizadevanja za iskanje rešitev v povezavi s tveganim kapitalom,
whereas financial support is of importance not only for research and development, but also for developing a product for the market, and whereas efforts to find solutions with regard to risk capital must therefore be increased,
ker morajo biti politike znotraj Evropske unije koherentne in delovati v smeri istega cilja; tehnološke rešitve za spodbujanje trajnosti je treba zato upoštevati pri pripravah proračuna in pri oblikovanju sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave; sredstva iz Strukturnih in Kohezijskega sklada je treba razporejati tako, da ti skladi podpirajo razvoj okoljskih tehnologij,
whereas policies within the European Union must be coherent and work towards the same goals; whereas technological solutions for promoting sustainability therefore have to be reflected in the preparation of the budget and in the design of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research; whereas the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund have to be used in ways that support the development of environmental technologies,
ker trajnostni razvoj zahteva globalne rešitve in mora EU potemtakem zagotoviti skladnost notranje in zunanje politike, ne samo v kontekstu bilateralnega sodelovanja in kreditnih izvoznih poslov, temveč tudi v povezavi z dogajanjem na ravni Združenih narodov, STO, OECD in Svetovne banke,
whereas sustainable development requires global solutions and the European Union therefore has to ensure that there is consistency between internal policies and external policies, not only in the context of bilateral co-operation and export credits but also in relation to developments with regard to the United Nations, the WTO, the OECD and the World Bank,
Povečevanje povpraševanja po okoljskih tehnologijah
Boosting demand for environmental technologies
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije kot dobrodošlo osnovo za razpravo in razvoj bolj konkretnih predlogov glede povečanja rabe okoljskih tehnologij, vendar meni, da je treba dati več poudarka razvoju povpraševanja po takšnih tehnologijah; poziva k nadomestitvi razdrobljenega pristopa, pri obravnavi okoljske politike in trajnostnega razvoja na splošno ter izrecno tega akcijskega načrta, s pristopom k okoljski politiki, ki temelji na sistemih in upoštevanju življenjskega kroga v skladu z okvirom integrirane politike do proizvodov (IPP), kjer so zelo pomembne novosti in razvoj okolju prijaznih tehnologij, ter končno, poudarja pomembnost usklajevanja med EU in državami članicami;
Welcomes the Communication as a useful basis for discussion and development of more concrete proposals on how to boost environmental technologies, but would like to see more emphasis on the development of the demand for such technologies; calls for the replacement of the fragmented approach, as regards environmental policy and sustainable development in general and as regards ETAP specifically, with a more systems-based approach to environmental policy, based on life-cycle thinking in line with the Integrated Product Policy (IPP) framework, where great importance is attached to innovation and the development of environmentally benign technologies, and, lastly, emphasises the importance of coordination between the EU and Member States;
meni, da je pomembno v strategijo konkurenčnosti EU vključiti okoljske vidike; opaža, da se mora ob pregledovanju Lizbonske strategije stanje okolja in izboljšanje stopnje zaposlovanja obravnavati kot priložnost za doseganje ciljev oblikovanja najbolj konkurenčnega gospodarstva, ki temelji na znanju; meni, da imata razvoj in uvedba okoljskih tehnologij pomembno vlogo na tem področju;
Considers it important to enhance the environmental dimension in the EU's strategy for competitiveness; observes that, when reviewing the Lisbon Strategy, the state of the environment and improving employment should be regarded as an opportunity to attain the objective of creating the most competitive knowledge-based economy; considers the development and introduction of environmental technologies to be of decisive importance in this connection;
opozarja na potencial rasti in zaposlovanja v sektorju okoljskih tehnologij, kjer bodo lahko ustvarjene številne nove poslovne priložnosti in zato nova delovna mesta – zlasti znotraj MSP – kar bi odločilno prispevalo k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev;
Points to the employment and growth potential of the environmental technologies sector, where a multitude of new business opportunities and, consequently, new jobs can be created – notably within small and medium-sized entreprisises (SMEs) – which could make a crucial contribution to attaining the Lisbon objectives;
poudarja, da mora EU, če želi doseči cilje Lizbonske strategije, bolj tesno sodelovati z MSP, in obžaluje napako za zagotovitev primerne vključitve MSP v ANOT;
Points out that if the EU wishes to meet the objectives of the Lisbon strategy it needs to work more closely with SMEs, and regrets the failure to ensure suitable inclusion of SMEs in ETAP;
poziva Komisijo, da določi faktorje, ki nalagajo največje obremenitve okolju danes, in nato obravnava, po posameznih sektorjih, kakšne tehnološke novosti so potrebne za reševanje teh težav; predlaga, da je pri tem treba upoštevati tudi naslednje:
Calls on the Commission to identify the factors which impose the greatest burden on the environment today and subsequently consider, sector by sector, what technological innovation is needed to address those problems; suggests that this work should include the following considerations:
priznava vlogo okoljskih politik kot nosilcev inovacij na področju tržnih gospodarstev, kjer novosti spodbujajo natančne zahteve; opozarja, da so stroge okoljske norme privedle k vodstvu EU v več rastnih sektorjih, in poudarja, da si mora EU prizadevati, da bo ostala vodja na trgu novih tehnologij in konceptualnih novosti; zato tudi poziva Komisijo k nadaljnjemu razvijanju metod in scenarijev za predvidevanje razvoja na področju okoljskih tehnologij;
Recognises the role of environmental policies as a driver of innovation in market economies where innovation is sparked by exacting requirements; recalls that strict environmental norms have led to EU leadership in many growth sectors and stresses that the EU should endeavour to remain a leader on the market for new technologies and conceptual innovations; therefore also calls on the Commission to further develop methods and scenarios for anticipating developments in the field of environmental technologies;
poudarja, da mora cilj okoljske zakonodaje EU stalno izboljševati stanje okolja in dosegati najvišjo možno stopnjo varstva okolja; meni, da mora zakonodaja temeljiti na najboljši razpoložljivi tehnologiji in mora biti poleg tega, da je ambiciozna, tudi stalna in predvidljiva, tako da ustvari zahtevano povpraševanje, ki temelji na trgu, po okoljskih tehnologijah v proizvodnji in podjetjih; opozarja, da je direktiva o oblikovanju ekoloških izdelkov, ki trenutno spada pod postopek soodločanja, prikaz, kako se lahko oblikuje okvir za pomembne izboljšave pri oblikovanju izdelka in okoljski učinkovitosti;
Stresses that the aim of the EU's environmental legislation is continuously to improve the state of the environment and to attain the highest possible level of environmental protection; considers that legislation should be based on the best available technology and, as well as being ambitious, must be sustained and predictable, so as to generate the requisite market-based demand for new environmental technologies in production and enterprises; notes that the Eco-Design Directive is one illustration of how a framework can be created for significant improvements in product design and environmental performance;
poziva Komisijo, da določi ambiciozen cilj za globalni tržni delež EU glede okoljskih tehnologij; meni, da bi morala EU v desetih letih doseči tržni delež najmanj 50 %; opozarja, da trg za okoljske dobrine in storitve hitro raste in da morajo evropska podjetja ohraniti pomembno vlogo na tem trgu ter izkoristiti začetne prednosti;
Calls on the Commission to set an ambitious target with regard to the EU's share of the global market for environmental technologies; considers that within ten years the EU should attain a market share of at least 50%; points out that the market for environmental goods and services is growing rapidly and that EU companies should continue to play an important role on this market and profit from first-mover advantage;
pozdravlja idejo o določitvi visokih ciljev učinkovitosti za vse vrste proizvodnje, storitev in razvoja izdelkov, še zlasti na prednostnih področjih, določenih v šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti; poudarja, da bodo ti cilji evropski industriji pomagali povečati konkurenčnost in ustvariti več delovnih mest ter zmanjšali obremenitev okolja; poziva Komisijo, da v kratkem zagotovi prvi seznam ciljev učinkovitosti na podlagi načela življenjskega cikla, ki jih je treba izvajati prek obveznih najmanjših zahtev ali prostovoljnih sporazumov, če dosežejo cilje politike hitreje ali lažje kot obvezne zahteve;
Welcomes the idea of agreeing ambitious performance targets for all kinds of production, services and product development, especially in the priority areas identified in the Sixth Environment Action Programme; points out that such targets will help European industry to increase its competitiveness and create more jobs, and at the same time result in a lesser burden on the environment; calls on the Commission to provide shortly a first list of performance targets based on the life-cycle approach to be implemented through mandatory minimum requirements, or voluntary agreements when they achieve the policy objectives more quickly or at lesser expense than mandatory requirements;
obžaluje, da sporočilo ne vključuje prvega seznama jasno določenih ciljev učinkovitosti na ključnih področjih okolja; poziva Komisijo, da v predloge za novo zakonodajo in predloge za spremembo obstoječe zakonodaje vključi ambiciozne cilje učinkovitosti; zavzema stališče, da morajo cilji temeljiti na najboljši razpoložljivi tehnologiji in jih je treba redno posodabljati glede na tehnološki napredek za zagotovitev intenzivnega spodbujanja za stalne novosti v industriji;
Regrets that the Communication does not include a first list of well-defined performance targets in key environment areas; calls on the Commission to include ambitious performance targets in proposals for new legislation and proposals to amend existing legislation; takes the view that the objectives should be based on the best available technology and should be regularly updated in the light of technical progress so as to provide powerful encouragement for constant innovation in industry;
poziva Komisijo, da državam članicam naroči, da oblikujejo načrt za izpolnjevanje zahtev, določenih v akcijskem načrtu okoljskih tehnologij (AKOP), ki morajo vključevati roke, ustrezajoče rokom, določenim v akcijskem načrtu okoljskih tehnologij, in povezave do ciljev učinkovitosti, tako da so vsi glavni cilji povezani in ovrednoteni na ravni države članice in EU ter imajo točno določene roke;
Calls on the Commission to instruct Member States to establish roadmaps for meeting the requirements defined in ETAP, which must include deadlines that correspond to the deadlines defined in ETAP and links to the performance targets, so that all major targets are linked and measured at both Member State and EU level and have fixed deadlines;
poziva Komisijo, da pomaga industriji v tekočem postopku integrirane politike do proizvodov (IPP) in ponovno razmisli o tradicionalnih poslovnih modelih v prizadevanju za spodbujanje razvoja bolj enotnih praks, ki temeljijo na sistemih, ter nameni posebno pozornost priložnostim, ki jih omogoča razvrščanje različnih proizvodnih dejavnosti, tako da se omogoči ostankom materialov iz enega postopka proizvodnje, da postanejo vnosi drugih proizvodnih postopkov, na primer uporaba komunalnih odpadkov za doseganje prihranka energije, s čimer se lahko pridobi gospodarske in tudi okoljske ugodnosti;
Calls on the Commission to assist industry in the on-going IPP process and rethink traditional business models in an effort to facilitate the development of more integrated and systems-based practices, giving specific attention to the opportunities offered by the clustering of different production activities, so as to enable residue materials from one production process to become the input of other production processes, for example the use of municipal waste to achieve energy savings, whereby economic as well as environmental benefits can be attained;
poudarja, da bosta učinkovitost sredstev in učinkovitost materialov zmanjšali stroške za industrije in gospodinjstva, sprostili vire za druge naložbe ter povzročili manjšo odvisnost gospodarstva EU od redkih virov in hitro minljivih trgov sredstev; zato poziva Komisijo, da predlaga zakonodajo za zmanjšanje uporabe obnovljivih in neobnovljivih virov;
Points out that resource efficiency and material efficiency will reduce costs for industry and households, free resources for other investment and make the EU economy less dependent on scarce resources and highly volatile resource markets; therefore urges the Commission to propose legislation to minimise the use of both renewable and non-renewable natural resources;
poudarja, da je treba uvajanje okoljskih tehnologij kombinirati z večjo učinkovitostjo izrabe virov in spremembo obnašanja potrošnikov, da bi lahko dosegli trajnostno rast v EU;
Underlines that the introduction of environmental technologies must be combined with increased resource efficiency and a shift in consumer attitudes in order for the EU to achieve sustainable growth;
poziva Komisijo, da pomaga pri razvoju metod in okoljskih kazalcev za merjenje obremenitve okolja, ki jo povzročajo različni proizvodi, storitve in procesi, da bi lahko vsi udeleženci sprejemali odločitve na osnovi informacij; poziva Komisijo in države članice, da začnejo s kampanjo, ki temelji na takšnih podatkih v zvezi z okoljsko učinkovitostjo, po EU za spodbujanje potrošnikov, da začnejo s povpraševanjem po okolju prijaznih tehnologijah;
Calls on the Commission to help develop methods and environmental indicators for measuring the burden on the environment of different products, services and processes, so as to enable all actors to make informed decisions; calls on the Commission and the Member States to launch a campaign based on such environmental performance information throughout the EU to encourage consumers to demand environmentally benign technologies;
ugotavlja, da je proces internalizacije eksternih (okoljskih) stroškov zelo počasen, in izpostavlja dejstvo, da bi rešitev tega problema na ravni Skupnosti (davki, davčne olajšave, subvencije, tržljiva dovoljenja, takse za uporabnike in povzročitelje onesnaževanja okolja itd.) bistveno prispevala k povečanju povpraševanja po okoljskih tehnologijah;
Notes that the process of internalising external (environmental) costs is very slow and points to the fact that finding solutions to this problem at Community level (taxes, tax breaks, subsidies, tradeable permits, user and polluter charges, etc.) would greatly improve the demand for environmental technologies;
pozdravlja Direktivo Sveta 2003/96/ES o prestruktiriranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije, kar je sicer majhen korak v pravo smer, vendar poudarja, da je na tem področju treba storiti več; poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, da so napredne pri predlaganju in sprejemanju novih pobud za krepitev sektorja obnovljivih virov energije;
Welcomes Council Directive 2003/96/EC restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, which is a small step in the right direction, but emphasises the need to do more in this area; urges the Commission, the Council and the Member States to be progressive when proposing and adopting new initiatives to enhance energy efficiency on the demand side, to reinforce the sector of renewable energy and promote the spread of co-generation and energy-efficient use of biomass, also with regard to transport, housing and construction;
poziva Komisijo, da določi ambiciozen cilj ob upoštevanju vloge javnega naročila za zagotovitev, da morajo vsa javna naročila kot splošno pravilo vključevati okoljske kriterije in da morajo države članice razviti standardizirane smernice za najbolj pomembne izdelke in storitve do leta 2007 ter tudi javnim posrednikom zagotoviti usposabljanje v zvezi s temi smernicami; poudarja, da je mehanizem potrjevanja okoljskih tehnologij ključni instrument za povečanje zelenih javnih naročil;
Calls on the Commission to set an ambitious target with regard to the role of public procurement, the goal being to establish as a general rule that all public procurement should include environmental criteria and that Member States should develop standardised guidelines for the most important products and services by 2007 as well as provide training to public procurers on these guidelines; underlines that a validation mechanism for environmental technologies would be a key instrument in boosting the use of Green Public Procurement (GPP);