natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Taka diskriminacija je lahko na primer obveznost, naložena samo državljanom drugih držav članic, da predložijo izvirne dokumente, overjene kopije, potrdila o državljanstvu ali uradne prevode dokumentov, da bi lahko izkoristili ugodnosti storitev oziroma ugodnejše pogoje ali cene.
Such discrimination could take the form of an obligation, imposed only on nationals of another Member State, to supply original documents, certified copies, a certificate of nationality or official translations of documents in order to benefit from a service or from more advantageous terms or prices.
Vendar prepoved diskriminacijskih zahtev ne bi smela izključevati omejevanja ugodnosti na nekatere prejemnike, še posebej glede tarif, če to omejevanje temelji na zakonitih in objektivnih merilih.
However, the prohibition of discriminatory requirements should not preclude the reservation of advantages, especially as regards tariffs, to certain recipients, if such reservation is based on legitimate and objective criteria.
Načelo prepovedi diskriminacije na notranjem trgu pomeni, da v splošnih pogojih, ki so dostopni javnosti, ne sme biti merila, ki bi na osnovi državljanstva ali bivališča prejemniku in še zlasti potrošniku preprečevalo dostop do storitve, ki je dostopna javnosti, ali bi ga pri tem oviralo.
The principle of non-discrimination within the internal market means that access by a recipient, and especially by a consumer, to a service on offer to the public may not be denied or restricted by application of a criterion, included in general conditions made available to the public, relating to the recipient's nationality or place of residence.
To tudi ne pomeni, da bi v primeru, če ponudnik ne opravi storitve za prejemnika, ker nima pravice do intelektualne lastnine na določenem ozemlju, to predstavljalo nezakonito diskriminacijo.
Neither does it follow that the non-provision of a service to a consumer for lack of the required intellectual property rights in a particular territory would constitute unlawful discrimination.
Primerno bi bilo zagotoviti, da ponudnik prejemniku predloži svoj elektronski naslov, vključno z naslovom spletne strani, saj je to eden od načinov, kako olajšati dostop do informacij, ki jih je ponudnik dolžan posredovati.
It is appropriate to provide that, as one of the means by which the provider may make the information which he is obliged to supply easily accessible to the recipient, he supply his electronic address, including that of his website.
Poleg tega obveznost, da ponudnik da na voljo določene informacije v informativnem gradivu, v katerem podrobno predstavlja svoje storitve, ne sme zajemati splošnih poslovnih komunikacij, kot so oglasi, ampak dokumente, ki podrobno opisujejo predlagane storitve, vključno z dokumenti na spletni strani.
Furthermore, the obligation to make available certain information in the provider's information documents which present his services in detail should not cover commercial communications of a general nature, such as advertising, but rather documents giving a detailed description of the services proposed, including documents on a website.
V tej direktivi je treba zagotoviti nekatere določbe, ki bodo zagotavljale visoko kakovost storitev in zlasti zahteve v zvezi z informacijami in preglednostjo.
It is necessary to provide in this Directive for certain rules on high quality of services, ensuring in particular information and transparency requirements.
Te določbe bi se morale uporabljati v primerih čezmejnega opravljanja storitev med državami članicami in v primerih storitev, ki jih v državi članici opravlja ponudnik s sedežem v tej državi članici, pri čemer njihova uporaba naj ne bi predstavljala nepotrebnih obremenitev za MSP.
These rules should apply both in cases of cross border provision of services between Member States and in cases of services provided in a Member State by a provider established there, without imposing unnecessary burdens on SMEs.
V nobenem primeru pa ta pravila ne bi smela preprečevati državam članicam, da v skladu s to uredbo in drugo zakonodajo Skupnosti ne bi uporabljale dodatnih ali različnih zahtev za kakovost.
They should not in any way prevent Member States from applying, in conformity with this Directive and other Community law, additional or different quality requirements.
Vsak izvajalec, ki opravlja storitve, pri katerih je prisotno za prejemnika ali tretjo osebo neposredno in posebno tveganje za zdravje, varnost ali finančno tveganje, mora načeloma imeti ustrezno zavarovanje poklicne odgovornosti ali drugo obliko jamstva, ki je enakovredna ali primerljiva, kar še posebej pomeni, da bi moral takšen izvajalec praviloma imeti ustrezno zavarovalno kritje za opravljanje storitev v eni ali več državah članicah, ki niso države članice ustanovitve.
Any operator providing services involving a direct and particular health, safety or financial risk for the recipient or a third person should, in principle, be covered by appropriate professional liability insurance, or by another form of guarantee which is equivalent or comparable, which means, in particular, that such an operator should as a general rule have adequate insurance cover for services provided in one or more Member States other than the Member State of establishment.
Zavarovanje ali jamstvo bi moralo ustrezati naravi in obsegu tveganja.
The insurance or guarantee should be appropriate to the nature and extent of the risk.
Zato morajo ponudniki imeti čezmejno kritje storitev le, če dejansko opravljajo storitve v drugih državah članicah.
Therefore it should be necessary for the provider to have cross-border cover only if that provider actually provides services in other Member States.
Države članice ne bi smele določiti podrobnosti zavarovalnega kritja niti na primer minimalnih pragov za zavarovalne vsote ali omejitev glede izvzetja iz zavarovalnega kritja.
Member States should not lay down more detailed rules concerning the insurance cover and fix for example minimum thresholds for the insured sum or limits on exclusions from the insurance cover.
Ponudniki in zavarovalnice bi morali ohraniti potrebno prilagodljivost pri dogovarjanju o zavarovalnih policah, natančno prilagojenih naravi in obsegu tveganja.
Providers and insurance companies should maintain the necessary flexibility to negotiate insurance policies precisely targeted to the nature and extent of the risk.
Poleg tega obveznosti glede ustreznega zavarovanja ni treba določiti z zakonom.
Furthermore, it is not necessary for an obligation of appropriate insurance to be laid down by law.
Prav tako se zavarovalniškim družbam ne bi smela naložiti obveznosti zagotavljanja zavarovalnega kritja.
Finally, there should be no obligation for insurance companies to provide insurance cover.
Treba je odpraviti popolno prepoved poslovnih komunikacij za regulirane poklice, vendar ne prepovedi, ki se nanašajo na vsebino poslovnih komunikacij, ampak tiste, ki na splošno in za določen poklic prepovedujejo eno ali več oblik poslovnih komunikacij, kot je na primer popolna prepoved oglaševanja v enem ali več določenih medijih.
It is necessary to put an end to total prohibitions on commercial communications by the regulated professions, not by removing bans on the content of a commercial communication but rather by removing those bans which, in a general way and for a given profession, forbid one or more forms of commercial communication, such as a ban on all advertising in one or more given media.
Glede vsebine in metod poslovnega komuniciranja je treba strokovnjake spodbuditi, da v skladu s pravom Skupnosti pripravijo kodekse ravnanja na ravni Skupnosti.
As regards the content and methods of commercial communication, it is necessary to encourage professionals to draw up, in accordance with Community law, codes of conduct at Community level.
Nujno in v interesu prejemnikov, zlasti potrošnikov, je zagotoviti, da imajo ponudniki možnost ponuditi multidisciplinarne dejavnosti in da se omejitve v zvezi s tem uvedejo zgolj zaradi zagotavljanja nepristranskosti, neodvisnosti in integritete reguliranih poklicev.
It is necessary and in the interest of recipients, in particular consumers, to ensure that it is possible for providers to offer multidisciplinary services and that restrictions in this regard be limited to what is necessary to ensure the impartiality, independence and integrity of the regulated professions.
To ne vpliva na omejitve ali prepovedi izvajanja določenih dejavnosti, ki imajo za cilj zagotavljanje neodvisnosti v primerih, ko država članica ponudniku storitve zaupa posebno nalogo, zlasti na področju mestnega razvoja, prav tako pa ne sme vplivati na uporabo predpisov o konkurenci.
This does not affect restrictions or prohibitions on carrying out particular activities which aim at ensuring independence in cases in which a Member State entrusts a provider with a particular task, notably in the area of urban development, nor should it affect the application of competition rules.
Za večjo preglednost in spodbujanje ocenjevanja, ki temelji na primerljivih merilih glede kakovosti v zvezi s storitvami, ponujenimi in zagotovljenimi prejemnikom, je pomembno, da so podatki o pomenu označb kakovosti in druge razpoznavne oznake za te storitve lahko dostopni.
In order to increase transparency and promote assessments based on comparable criteria with regard to the quality of the services offered and supplied to recipients, it is important that information on the meaning of quality labels and other distinctive marks relating to these services be easily accessible.
Obveznost glede preglednosti je predvsem pomembna v turizmu, zlasti v hotelirstvu, kjer je sistem razvrščanja že precej razširjen.
That obligation of transparency is particularly important in areas such as tourism, especially the hotel business, in which the use of a system of classification is widespread.
Evropske standarde pripravljajo organi za določanje standardov, Evropski odbor za standardizacijo (CEN), Evropski odbor za elektrotehnično standardizacijo (CENELEC) in Evropski inštitut za telekomunikacijske standarde (ETSI).
European standards are drawn up by the European standards-setting bodies, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN), the European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC) and the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
Komisija lahko po potrebi v skladu s postopki, ki jih določa Direktiva 98/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. junija 1998 o določitvi postopka za zbiranje informacij na področju tehničnih standardov in tehničnih predpisov ter predpisov o storitvah informacijske družbe UL L 204, 21.7.1998, str.
Where appropriate, the Commission may, in accordance with the procedures laid down in Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p.
, izda pooblastilo za pripravo specifičnih evropskih standardov.
, issue a mandate for the drawing up of specific European standards.
Za rešitev morebitnih problemov glede izvrševanja sodne odločbe bi bilo primerno zagotoviti, da države članice priznajo enakovredna jamstva, ki so jih vložile institucije ali organi, kot so banke, ponudniki zavarovanj ali drugi ponudniki finančnih storitev s sedežem v drugi državi članici.
In order to solve potential problems with compliance with judicial decisions, it is appropriate to provide that Member States recognise equivalent guarantees lodged with institutions or bodies such as banks, insurance providers or other financial services providers established in another Member State.
Razvoj mreže organov za varstvo potrošnikov držav članic, ki je predmet Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004, dopolnjuje sodelovanje, predvideno s to direktivo.
The development of a network of Member States' consumer protection authorities, which is the subject of Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004, complements the cooperation provided for in this Directive.
Uporaba zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov v čezmejnih primerih, zlasti v zvezi z novimi tržnimi in prodajnimi praksami, kot tudi potreba po odpravi določenih posebnih ovir sodelovanja na tem področju narekuje višjo stopnjo sodelovanja med državami članicami.
The application of consumer protection legislation in cross-border cases, in particular with regard to new marketing and selling practices, as well as the need to remove certain specific obstacles to cooperation in this field, necessitates a greater degree of cooperation between Member States.
Na tem področju je zlasti treba zagotoviti, da države članice zahtevajo prenehanje nezakonitih praks, ki jih na njihovem ozemlju uvajajo izvajalci, usmerjeni k potrošnikom v drugih državah članicah.
In particular, it is necessary in this area to ensure that Member States require the cessation of illegal practices by operators in their territory who target consumers in another Member State.
Upravno sodelovanje je bistvenega pomena za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga storitev.
Administrative cooperation is essential to make the internal market in services function properly.
Nesodelovanje med državami članicami vodi v podvajanje predpisov, ki veljajo za ponudnike, ali podvajanje preverjanj za čezmejne dejavnosti in ga lahko izkoristijo tudi prevaranti, da se izognejo nadzoru ali obidejo veljavna nacionalna pravila o storitvah.
Lack of cooperation between Member States results in proliferation of rules applicable to providers or duplication of controls for cross-border activities, and can also be used by rogue traders to avoid supervision or to circumvent applicable national rules on services.
Za namene poglavja o upravnem sodelovanju bi se moral "nadzor" nanašati na dejavnosti, kot so spremljanje in ugotavljanje dejstev, reševanje težav, izvrševanje in nalaganje kazni ter s tem povezani nadaljnji ukrepi.
For the purposes of the Chapter on administrative cooperation, "supervision" should cover activities such as monitoring and fact finding, problem solving, enforcement and imposition of sanctions and subsequent follow-up activities.
V normalnih okoliščinah bi si morali pristojni organi neposredno medsebojno pomagati.
In normal circumstances mutual assistance should take place directly between competent authorities.
Točke za stike, ki jih določijo države članice, bi morale ta postopek olajšati samo v primeru težav, na primer če bo potrebna pomoč pri ugotavljanju ustreznega pristojnega organa.
The liaison points designated by Member States should be required to facilitate this process only in the event of difficulties being encountered, for instance if assistance is required to identify the relevant competent authority.
Nekatere obveznosti v zvezi z medsebojno pomočjo bi se morale uporabljati v vseh zadevah iz te direktive, vključno s tistimi, ki se nanašajo na primere, ko ima ponudnik sedež v drugi državi članici.
Certain obligations of mutual assistance should apply to all matters covered by this Directive, including those relating to cases where a provider establishes in another Member State.
Druge obveznosti v zvezi z medsebojno pomočjo bi se morale uporabljati samo v primerih čezmejnega opravljanja storitev, ko velja določba o svobodi opravljanja storitev.
Other obligations of mutual assistance should apply only in cases of cross-border provision of services, where the provision on the freedom to provide services applies.
Nadaljnji sklop obveznosti bi se moral uporabljati v vseh primerih čezmejnega opravljanja storitev, vključno s področji, ki niso zajeta v določbi o svobodi opravljanja storitev.
A further set of obligations should apply in all cases of cross-border provision of services, including areas not covered by the provision on the freedom to provide services.
Čezmejno opravljanje storitev bi moralo vključevati primere, ko se storitve opravljajo na daljavo in ko prejemnik odpotuje v državo članico, kjer ima ponudnik storitve sedež, da bi prejel storitev.
Cross-border provision of services should include cases where services are provided at a distance and where the recipient travels to the Member State of establishment of the provider in order to receive services.
V primerih, ko ponudnik začasno opravlja storitve v državi članici, ki ni država članica ustanovitve, je treba omogočiti medsebojno pomoč med tema dvema državama članicama, tako da država članica, v kateri ponudnik začasno opravlja storitve, lahko izvaja kontrole, preglede in poizvedbe na zahtevo države članice ustanovitve ali izvaja take kontrole na lastno pobudo, če kontrolira le dejansko stanje.
In cases where a provider moves temporarily to a Member State other than the Member State of establishment, it is necessary to provide for mutual assistance between those two Member States so that the former can carry out checks, inspections and enquiries at the request of the Member State of establishment or carry out such checks on its own initiative if these are merely factual checks.
Države članice ne bi smele zaobiti določb iz te direktive, vključno z določbo o svobodi opravljanja storitev, z izvajanjem diskriminatornih ali nesorazmernih kontrol, pregledov ali preiskav.
It should not be possible for Member States to circumvent the rules laid down in this Directive, including the provision on the freedom to provide services, by conducting checks, inspections or investigations which are discriminatory or disproportionate.
Določbe te direktive v zvezi z izmenjavo informacij o dobrem imenu ponudnikov ne bi smele posegati v prihodnje pobude na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, zlasti glede izmenjave informacij med organi pregona držav članic in kazenskimi evidencami.
The provisions of this Directive concerning exchange of information regarding the good repute of providers should not pre-empt initiatives in the area of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, in particular on the exchange of information between law enforcement authorities of the Member States and on criminal records.
Sodelovanje med državami članicami zahteva dobro delujoč elektronski informacijski sistem, da se pristojnim organom omogoči preprosto prepoznavanje ustreznih sogovornikov v drugih državah članicah in učinkovito sporazumevanje.
Cooperation between Member States requires a well-functioning electronic information system in order to allow competent authorities easily to identify their relevant interlocutors in other Member States and to communicate in an efficient way.
Treba je zagotoviti, da države članice v sodelovanju s Komisijo spodbudijo zainteresirane strani, da pripravijo kodekse ravnanja na ravni Skupnosti, ki bi ob upoštevanju posebnosti vsakega poklica izboljšali zlasti kakovost storitev.
It is necessary to provide that the Member States, in cooperation with the Commission, are to encourage interested parties to draw up codes of conduct at Community level, aimed, in particular, at promoting the quality of services and taking into account the specific nature of each profession.
Ne bi smeli biti v nasprotju s pravno zavezujočimi predpisi, ki urejajo poklicno etiko in ravnanje v državah članicah.
They should be compatible with legally binding rules governing professional ethics and conduct in the Member States.
Države članice bi morale za pripravo kodeksov ravnanja spodbuditi zlasti poklicna telesa, organizacije in združenja na ravni Skupnosti.
Member States should encourage the setting up of codes of conduct, in particular, by professional bodies, organisations and associations at Community level.
Ti kodeksi ravnanja morajo v skladu s specifično naravo vsakega poklica vključevati pravila poslovnih komunikacij za regulirane poklice ter pravila poklicne etike in ravnanja za regulirane poklice, katerih cilj je zlasti zagotavljanje neodvisnosti, nepristranskosti in varovanja poslovne skrivnosti.
These codes of conduct should include, as appropriate to the specific nature of each profession, rules for commercial communications relating to the regulated professions and rules of professional ethics and conduct of the regulated professions which aim, in particular, at ensuring independence, impartiality and professional secrecy.
Poleg tega je treba v takšne kodekse ravnanja vključiti tudi pogoje, ki jih morajo upoštevati nepremičninski posredniki pri izvajanju dejavnosti.
In addition, the conditions to which the activities of estate agents are subject should be included in such codes of conduct.
Države članice morajo sprejeti spremljevalne ukrepe za spodbujanje poklicnih teles, organizacij in združenj, da na nacionalni ravni izvajajo kodekse ravnanja, ki so bili sprejeti na ravni Skupnosti.
Member States should take accompanying measures to encourage professional bodies, organisations and associations to implement at national level the codes of conduct adopted at Community level.
Namen kodeksov ravnanja na ravni Skupnosti je določiti minimalne standarde ravnanja in dopolnitev pravnih zahtev držav članic.
Codes of conduct at Community level are intended to set minimum standards of conduct and are complementary to Member States' legal requirements.
V skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti ti kodeksi ravnanja državam članicam ne preprečujejo uvedbe strožjih ukrepov v zakonodaji ali nacionalnim poklicnim telesom zagotovitve večje zaščite v nacionalnih kodeksih ravnanja.
They do not preclude Member States, in accordance with Community law, from taking more stringent measures in law or national professional bodies from providing for greater protection in their national codes of conduct.
Ker ciljev te direktive, in sicer odprave ovir za svobodno ustanavljanje ponudnikov v državah članicah in svobodno opravljanje storitev med državami članicami, države članice ne morejo zadovoljivo doseči in ker ta cilj zaradi obsega in učinkov predlaganega ukrepa laje doseže Skupnost, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti iz člena 5 Pogodbe.
Since the objectives of this Directive, namely the elimination of barriers to the freedom of establishment for providers in the Member States and to the free provision of services between Member States, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti iz navedenega člena ta direktiva ne presega okvirov, ki so potrebni za doseganje navedenega cilja.
In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives.
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te direktive, bi bilo treba sprejeti skladno s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
The measures necessary for the implementation of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
V skladu s točko 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
In accordance with paragraph 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
se države članice spodbuja, da za svoje potrebe in v interesu Skupnosti izdelajo in objavijo lastne tabele, ki naj, kolikor nazorno je to mogoče, prikažejo korelacijo med to direktivo in ukrepi za prenos v nacionalno pravo –
, Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Community, their own tables, which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between the Directive and the transposition measures, and to make them public,
Ta direktiva ne obravnava odprave monopolov, ki opravljajo storitve, niti pomoči, ki jih dodeljujejo države članice in za katere veljajo pravila Skupnosti o konkurenci.
This Directive does not deal with the abolition of monopolies providing services nor with aids granted by Member States which are covered by Community rules on competition.