natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Številni predlogi sprememb Komisije bi nasprotno celo znižali obstoječe standarde.
On the contrary, many of the amendments proposed by the Commission would even reduce the present standard.
Najbolj skrajen med temi je predlog Komisije za spremembo člena 3, ki bi znatno zožil opredelitev dokumenta.
The most severe of these is the amendment that the Commission is proposing to Article 3 which would significantly limit the definition of a document.
Po mnenju pripravljavke mnenja bi bilo treba ohraniti nespremenjeno sedanjo opredelitev, saj zajema vse bistvene dokumente, ne le evidentiranih.
In the Rapporteur's opinion, the present definition should remain, covering all relevant documents - not only registered ones.
Za pripravljavko mnenja je zaskrbljujoč tudi predlog spremembe, ki zadeva pravico države članice, da zadrži dokumente v skladu s členom 5.
Another amendment that the Rapporteur finds worrying concerns the right of the Member States to withhold documents under Article 5.
V skladu z besedilom, ki ga predlaga Komisija, bi imele države članice neomejeno pravico, da se sklicujejo na svojo zakonodajo in s tem utemeljijo zavrnitev dostopa do dokumenta, ki izvira iz države članice.
The formulation proposed by the Commission would give the Member States an unlimited right to refer back to their own legislation to justify refusing access to a document originating from a Member state.
Institucije bodo lahko obravnavale le utemeljitve na podlagi uredbe in ne tistih na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje.
The institutions will only be able to consider grounds based on the Regulation, and not based on national law.
Takšna pravica bi oslabila načelo preglednosti in ga v celoti prepustila pristojnosti držav članic.
Such a right would 'water down' the principle of transparency and leave it completely to the discretion of Member States.
Zadostovati bi morale izjeme, navedene v členu 4 uredbe.
The exceptions listed in Article 4 of the Regulation should be sufficient.
Sicer bi bilo treba spremeniti člen 4, ne pa dati neomejene pravice državam članicam.
If they are not, changes should be made in Article 4 and not by giving the Member States unlimited rights.
Namen uredbe
The purpose of the regulation
Ta uredba, kot je navedeno v njenem naslovu, zadeva dostop javnosti do dokumentov.
As the title of the Regulation states, it concerns public access to documents.
Naš poglavitni cilj je jamčiti za pravico državljanov do sodelovanja v demokratičnem življenju Unije z zagotavljanjem kar najširšega možnega dostopa do dokumentov EU.
Our main objective is to guarantee the rights of citizens to participate in the democratic life of the Union by granting the widest possible access to EU documents.
Po mnenju pripravljavke mnenja je treba jasno ločevati med „dostopom javnosti do dokumentov“ in „obveščanjem in udeležbo državljanov“ na eni strani ter na drugi strani pravico do dostopa institucij, tudi do zaupnih dokumentov.
According to the rapporteur, there should be a clear distinction between 'public access to documents' and 'information and participation of citizens', on the one hand, and the institutions' right of access, even to confidential documents, on the other.
To drugo bi bilo mogoče urediti z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom.
The latter may be settled via inter-institutional agreement.
(a) „dokument“ pomeni neko vsebino ne glede na to, kakšen je njen medij (napisana na papirju ali shranjena v elektronski obliki ali kot zvočni, vizualni ali avdiovizualni zapis), ki ga je pripravila institucija in ga je uradno poslala enemu ali več prejemnikom ali kako drugače evidentirala, ali ki ga je institucija prejela ; podatki iz sistemov za elektronsko shranjevanje, obdelavo ali priklic so dokumenti, če jih je mogoče izvleči v obliki tiskalniškega izpisa ali elektronskega zapisa z orodji, ki so na voljo za uporabo sistema;
(a) « document » means any content whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording) drawn-up by an institution and formally transmitted to one or more recipients or otherwise registered, or received by an institution; data contained in electronic storage, processing and retrieval systems are documents if they can be extracted in the form of a printout or electronic-format copy using the available tools for the exploitation of the system;
(a) „dokument“ pomeni podatke ali vsebino, ne glede na to, kakšen je njen medij (napisana na papirju ali shranjena v elektronski obliki ali kot zvočni, vizualni ali avdiovizualni zapis), o zadevi, ki se nanaša na politiko, dejavnost in odločitve s področja odgovornosti institucije, organa, urada ali agencije ; informacije iz sistemov za elektronsko shranjevanje, obdelavo ali priklic (vključno z zunanjimi sistemi, ki se uporabljajo za delo institucije, organa, urada ali agencije) so dokument ali dokumenti, če jih je mogoče izvleči v obliki enega ali več tiskalniških izpisov ali elektronskih zapisov z orodji, ki so na voljo za uporabo sistema;
(a) “ document ” shall mean any data or content whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording) concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities and decisions falling within the sphere of responsibility of an institution, body, office or agency; information contained in electronic storage, processing and retrieval systems (including external systems used for the work of an institution, body, office or agency) shall constitute a document or documents if it can be extracted in the form of one or more printouts or electronic-format copies using the available tools for the exploitation of the system;
Predlog spremembe, ki ga predlaga Komisija, bi omejil dostop javnosti le na majhno število dokumentov.
The amendment proposed by the Commission would limit public access to only a small number of documents.
To bi pomenilo jasno znižanje standardov odprtosti glede na sedanje stanje.
This would be a clear lowering of standards of openness compared to the present situation.
(c) pravnih nasvetov in sodnih in arbitražnih postopkov ter postopkov reševanja sporov ;
(c) legal advice and court, arbitration and dispute settlement proceedings;
(c) pravnih nasvetov , ki zadevajo sodne postopke ;
(c) legal advice dealing with court proceedings;
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti je v sodbi v zadevi Turco izjavilo, da razkritje pravnih nasvetov v okviru zakonodajnih pobud povečuje preglednost in odprtost zakonodajnega postopka in utrjuje demokratične pravice evropskih državljanov.
The Court of Justice stated in its judgment of the Turco case that disclosure of legal advice in legislative initiatives increases the transparency and openness of the legislative process and strengthens the democratic rights of European citizens.
V zvezi z odstavkom 2(a) šteje, da prevlada javni interes za razkritje , če se zahtevane informacije nanašajo na emisije v okolje .
As regards paragraph 2(a) an overriding public interest in disclosure shall be deemed to exist where the information requested relates to emissions into the environment .
Izjeme iz odstavka (2) se uporabljajo, razen če prevlada javni interes za razkritje.
The exceptions under paragraph (2) shall apply unless there is an overriding public interest in disclosure.
Pri ocenjevanju javnega interesa za razkritje je treba še posebej upoštevati dejstvo, da so zahtevani dokumenti povezani z varovanjem temeljnih pravic, okolja ali zdravja ljudi .
When assessing the public interest in disclosure , special weight shall be given to the fact that the requested documents relate to the protection of fundamental rights, environment, or human health .
Uredba 1367/2006 opredeljuje prevladujoči javni interes za razkritje informacij o izpustih v okolje.
Regulation 1367/2006 establishes an overriding public interest in the release of information concerning emissions to the environment.
Podobna domneva v korist prevlade javnega interesa bi morala veljati pri objavi informacij, ki zadevajo varstvo temeljnih pravic ali tveganje za zdravje ljudi.
There should be a similar presumption in favour of an overriding public interest in the release of information concerning protection of fundamental rights or risks to human health.
– če se podatki nanašajo le na poklicne dejavnosti osebe, razen če obstaja razlog za domnevo – odvisno od posebnih okoliščin – da bi razkritje osebi škodilo;
– if the data relate solely to the professional activities of the person concerned unless, given the particular circumstances, there is reason to assume that disclosure would adversely affect that person;
– če se podatki nanašajo le na javno osebo, razen če obstaja razlog za domnevo – odvisno od posebnih okoliščin – da bi razkritje škodilo tej osebi ali njenim sorodnikom;
– if the data relate solely to a public person unless, given the particular circumstances, there is reason to assume that disclosure would adversely affect that person or other persons related to him or her;
– če so bili podatki že objavljeni s privolitvijo zadevne osebe.
– if the data have already been published with the consent of the person concerned.
V takšnih primerih mora institucija, organ, urad ali agencija natančno opredeliti javni interes.
In such cases, the institution, body, office or agency shall be required to specify the public interest.
Če institucija, organ, urad ali agencija zavrne dostop do dokumenta na podlagi tega odstavka, preuči, ali je mogoče dovoliti delni dostop do tega dokumenta.
Where an institution, body, office or agency refuses access to a document on the basis of this paragraph, it shall consider whether partial access to that document is possible .
Predlog Komisije ne izpolni potrebe po pravem ravnotežju med temeljnimi pravicami, ki so v igri.
The Commission proposal does not do justice to the need for a right balance between the fundamental rights at stake.
Izjeme, določene v tem členu, se ne uporabljajo za dokumente, posredovane med postopkom sprejemanja zakonodajnega akta ali nezakonodajnega akta, ki se splošno uporablja .
The exceptions as laid down in this Article shall not apply to documents transmitted in the framework of procedures leading to a legislative act or a non-legislative act of general application.
Če po prejetih informacijah prosilec od institucij želi dobiti nove dokumente, se njegova prošnja obravnava kot nova, odgovor pa se pošlje v skladu s členoma 7 in 8.
If, after receiving the information, the applicant requests further documents from the institutions, that request shall be dealt with as a fresh application in accordance with Articles 7 and 8.
Andrew Henry William Brons, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Potito Salatto, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski
Andrew Henry William Brons, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Zita Gurmai, Gerald Häfner, Stanimir Ilchev, Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Potito Salatto, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, Indrek Tarand, Rafał Trzaskowski
o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
Pripravljavka mnenja: Ágnes Hankiss,
Rapporteur: Ágnes Hankiss
V skladu s členom 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) morajo institucije in organi EU sprejemati odločitve čim bolj javno in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani.
According to Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) Community institutions and bodies must take decisions as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizens.
Da bi lahko učinkovito sodelovali v političnem procesu in poklicali na odgovornost javne organe, bi morali imeti državljani in izvoljeni organi čim širši dostop do dokumentov evropskih institucij.
In order to enable them to effectively participate in the political process and call public authorities to account, citizens and elected bodies should therefore have the widest possible access to documents held by the European institutions.
Na prvem mestu bi morala Komisija popolnoma revidirati svoj predhodni predlog, saj začetek veljavnosti Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije predpisuje nov pravni okvir na temeljih člena 15(3).
First and foremost, the Commission should have completely reviewed its earlier proposal as the entry into force of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides a new legal framework based on Article 15(3).
Svoj predlog bi morala vključiti v dokument KOM(2009)0665 o posledicah začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe.
The Commission should have included its proposal in COM(2009)0665 on the consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Predloga ni nikoli uradno umaknila in ga nadomestila z novim predlogom, ki bi upošteval novi okvir Lizbonske pogodbe.
The Commission did not formally withdraw the proposal and never replaced it with a new proposal that takes account of the new framework of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Najbolj izrazit korak nazaj je opredelitev, ki jo je preoblikovala Komisija (člen 3) v zvezi s pojmom „dokument”, ki je bistven pojem uredbe.
The most notable step backwards is the Commission's reformulated definition (Article 3) of "document", the concept that lies at the very heart of the Regulation.
Poročevalka je mnenja, da bi namesto zožitve opredelitve, kot to dejansko predlaga Komisija, morali pojem „dokument” razširiti, da bi se osredotočil na uradne informacije, saj bi prosilcem za dostop do podatkov omogočili zahteve po določenih informacijah na bolj natančen, ciljno usmerjen in celosten način, pri čemer bi se izognili posredovanju množice nepotrebnih podatkov, ki povzročajo tudi dodatne stroške.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that instead of narrowing down the definition, as the Commission in fact proposes, the term “document” should be opened up to focus on ”official information” as access to pieces of information by applicants would make it possible to ask for specific information in a more precise, targeted and comprehensive way, avoiding the receipt of masses of unnecessary data, possibly generating extra costs.
Z novo opredelitvijo bi bilo tudi lažje dobiti delni dostop do nekaterih tajnih dokumentov in bi bilo mogoče jasno ločevati med neuradnimi in uradnimi informacijami.
The new definition could also make it easier to get partial access to certain classified documents, and would make it possible to clearly differentiate unofficial and official information.
Medtem ko cilj te uredbe ostaja lažji javni dostop do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij EU, bi se z dopustitvijo javnega dostopa do vmesnih dokumentov, kot so osnutki sporočil ali obvestil, uradni tok informacij spremenil v neuradne in/ali medvladne stike, kar bi znižalo raven preglednosti in oslabilo Evropsko unijo.
While easier public access to documents of EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies remains the goal of this Regulation, making intermediary documents, such as draft notes or memoranda publicly available could shift official information flow to informal and/or intergovernmental channels resulting in less transparency and a weaker European Union.
Pristojbine za iskanje dokumentov in njihove kopije ne bi smele presegati razumnih običajnih pristojbin.
Search and duplication fees should be limited to reasonable standard charges for document search and duplication.
Komisija bi morala oblikovati predloge v zvezi z omenjenimi točkami.
The Commission should make proposals on the aforementioned points.
Za državljane je posebej pomembno, da se, na primer v primerih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki so pogosto sproženi na podlagi njihovih peticij, zagotovi popolni dostop do vseh dokumentov iz zaključenih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev.
For citizens it is of particular importance that, e.g. in the case of infringement procedures which often result from citizens' petitions, full access should be provided to all documents of closed infringement proceedings.
To zajema tudi dokumente, ki jih pošiljajo države članice.
This includes documents provided by Member States.
Poročevalka poudarja, da je predlog Komisije, ki državam članicam podeljuje pravico, da zavrnejo dostop do dokumentov (člen 5) na podlagi nacionalne zakonodaje, v nasprotju s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije in ni sprejemljiv.
Your rapporteur points out that the Commission's proposal to give Member States a right to refuse access to documents (Article 5) based on their own legislation is contrary to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice and therefore not acceptable.
Kar zadeva člen 9 („Obravnava dokumentov občutljive narave“) je pomembno, da institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije določijo skupna pravila za razvrstitev takih dokumentov in da so ta pravila javna.
With regard to Article 9 ("Treatment of sensitive documents") it is important that the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union should lay down common rules for the classification of such documents and that these rules should be made public.
Odbor za peticije meni, da je ohranitev in okrepitev zaupanja državljanov v institucije, organe, urade in agencije EU izrednega pomena.
The Committee on Petitions considers the maintenance and increase of the trust of citizens in the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of high importance.
EU mora ščititi osebne podatke in zasebnost z najvišjimi možnimi standardi in ne sme ustvarjati predpisov, ki bi dopuščali ukrepe, ki jih je težko izvajati objektivno.
The EU must protect personal data and privacy at the highest possible standards and should not create rules allowing measures that are difficult to apply objectively.
Čeprav obstaja zakonodaja EU v zvezi z razlago „prevladujočega javnega interesa”, bi bilo zaželeno, da bi Komisija ponudila natančno in konkretno opredelitev tega pojma.
While EU case law exists regarding the interpretation of “overriding public interest”, it would desirable for the Commission to provide an exact and concrete definition of the term
Tajnih podatkov prejemnik ne sme posredovati tretji stranki brez predhodne privolitve tistega, ki jih je ustvaril.
Classified information shall not be transmitted from the recipient to a third party without prior consent of the originator.
Odbor za peticije bi pozdravil skupni okvir in postopke za določitev stopenj tajnosti dokumentov, pri čemer bi morale imeti institucije, organi, uradi in agencije Unije med drugim možnost, da revidirajo in spremenijo stopnjo tajnosti dokumenta po prejetju zahteve za javni dostop do njega.
The Committee on Petitions would welcome a common framework and procedure for declassification rules, including a possibility for the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to review and reset the classification category of a document upon a request for public access to it.
Tako bi lahko razkritje predhodno tajnih dokumentov omogočili na bolj prožen način.
Thus formerly classified documents could be disclosed in a more flexible way.
Če institucija zavrne zahtevo za dostop do dokumenta na osnovi določb te uredbe, je dolžna sporočiti, ali in, če je temu tako, kdaj bo delni ali popolni dostop verjetno mogoč v prihodnje.
In case an institution rejects an application for a document based on the provisions in this Regulation, the institution shall be obliged to provide notification as to whether and when partial or full access is likely to be possible at a later stage.
Poročevalka meni, da je za uspeh pobude za preglednost v Evropi potrebno, da prosilci z lahkoto najdejo in dobijo želene informacije.
Your rapporteur is of the opinion that for the European Transparency Initiative to succeed applicants must be able to easily find and retrieve the information they want.
V okviru te uredbe bi torej morale institucije zagotoviti, da se dokumenti izdajajo prek skupnega vmesnika za registre dokumentov ali vmesnika z neposrednimi povezavami do registrov posameznih institucij.
In the context of this Regulation therefore the institutions should ensure that documents are supplied either through a common interface for their registers of documents or through an interface with direct links to each institution’s own register.
Ta uredba se uporablja za vse dokumente institucij, to je za dokumente, ki jih institucije pripravijo ali prejmejo in so v njihovi lasti , o zadevi v zvezi s politikami, dejavnostmi ali odločitvami s področja njihove pristojnosti, na vseh področjih delovanja Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall apply to all documents held by an institution, namely, documents drawn up or received by it and in its possession concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities and decisions falling within its sphere of responsibility, in all areas of activity of the European Union.
Ta uredba se uporablja za vse dokumente institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij Evropske unije o zadevah v zvezi s politikami, dejavnostmi, zaključenimi postopki v zvezi s kršitvami prava EU in odločitvami s področja njihove pristojnosti, na vseh področjih delovanja Evropske unije.
This Regulation shall apply to all documents held by an institution, body, office or agency of the European Union concerning a matter relating to the policies, activities , closed procedures concerning infringements of EU law and decisions falling within its sphere of responsibility, in all areas of activity of the European Union.
Uredba bi se morala uporabljati za vse dokumente institucij, organov, uradov ali agencij Evropske unije (iz člena 3).
The Regulation should apply to all documents (as defined in Article 3) held by an institution, body, office or agency of the European Union.
Posebej so omenjeni dokumenti, ki se nanašajo na preiskave o kršitvah prava Evropske unije, ki jih lahko stranke (npr. vlagatelji peticij) zahtevajo za uveljavljanje svoje pravice do pravnega varstva.
Specific reference is made to documents concerning investigations into infringements of EU law that may be requested by parties (e.g. petitioners) to exercise their rights to redress or remedy.
(a) „dokument“ pomeni neko vsebino ne glede na to, kakšen je njen medij (napisana na papirju ali shranjena v elektronski obliki ali kot zvočni, vizualni ali avdiovizualni zapis), ki ga je pripravila institucija in ga je uradno poslala enemu ali več prejemnikom ali kako drugače evidentirala, ali ki ga je institucija prejela ; podatki iz sistemov za elektronsko shranjevanje, obdelavo ali priklic so dokumenti, če jih je mogoče izvleči v obliki tiskalniškega izpisa ali elektronskega zapisa z orodji, ki so na voljo za uporabo sistema ;
(a) "document" means any content whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording) drawn-up by an institution and formally transmitted to one or more recipients or otherwise registered, or received by an institution; data contained in electronic storage, processing and retrieval systems are documents if they can be extracted in the form of a printout or electronic-format copy using the available tools for the exploitation of the system ;
(a) „dokument“ pomeni zapis ali niz zapisov, ki služijo v uradne namene , ne glede na to, kakšen je njihov medij (na papirju ali v elektronski obliki ali kot zvočni, vizualni ali avdiovizualni zapis), o zadevi, ki sodi v področje pristojnosti institucije, organa, urada ali agencije Evropske unije .
(a) "document" means a record, or set of records, serving official purposes whatever its medium (written on paper or stored in electronic form or as a sound, visual or audiovisual recording) concerning a matter which falls within the sphere of responsibility of the European Union's institutions, bodies, offices or agencies .
To ne vključuje osnutkov, sporočil ali obvestil, katerih namen ni, da bi bili del nekega dosjeja .
This shall not include drafts, notes and memoranda which are not intended to form part of a file ;
Opredelitev pojma „dokument“, kot ga predlaga Komisija, je preozka.
The definition of "document" as proposed by the Commission is too narrow.