natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19. podpira namen Komisije, da spodbudi uporabo dostopnega, hitrega, učinkovitega in poceni alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki lahko omogoča vzpostavitev in vzdrževanje kakovostnih trgovinskih, gospodarskih, socialnih in sosedskih odnosov, ki temeljijo na zaupanju, ter prispevajo k visoki ravni varstva potrošnikov, s čemer v primerjavi s sedanjo pravosodno prakso pridobita obe strani;
Supports the Commission’s intention of encouraging the use of alternative means of dispute resolution that are accessible, swift, effective and cheap and apt to enable the establishment and maintenance of quality and trust-based commercial, economic, social and neighbourhood relations and to contribute to a high level of consumer protection in a ‘win-win’ situation, with benefits for both sides as compared to current judicial practice;
22. je seznanjen z dosežki omrežij FIN-NET, ECC-Net in SOLVIT, vendar meni, da so še mogoče izboljšave kar zadeva obveščanje strank in financiranje, ter poziva Komisijo, naj podpre, okrepi in poveča zmogljivosti že obstoječih organov, kot so tisti, ki so že dokazali svojo učinkovitost in vrednost;
Acknowledges the achievements of FIN-NET, ECC-Net and SOLVIT, but believes that, as regards information to parties and funding, there is still room for improvement, and calls on the Commission to support, strengthen and enhance the capabilities of, existing bodies such as these that have demonstrated their effectiveness and value;
26. se strinja s Komisijo, da ustrezen dostop do odškodnine na notranjem trgu zahteva hkrati možnost preproste uporabe alternativnega reševanja sporov in tudi učinkovit sistem kolektivne tožbe, saj se dopolnjujeta in medsebojno ne izključujeta;
Agrees with the Commission that appropriate access to reparation in the internal market requires both the possibility of easy recourse to ADR and the existence of an effective system for collective claims, the two being complementary and not mutually exclusive ;
29. poudarja, da je treba evropskim potrošnikom zagotoviti dostop do sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov za nadnacionalne in nacionalne spore, zlasti na spletnem trgu, ki se v EU hitro povečuje; ugotavlja, da uporaba sistemov alternativnega reševanja sporov omogoča boljše varstvo pravic potrošnikov in dviguje njihovo zaupanje v trg, podjetja in ustanove za varstvo pravic potrošnikov, saj jih dela privlačnejše, obenem pa spodbuja čezmejno trgovino in povečuje uspeh vseh udeležencev na trgu EU;
Stresses the need to ensure that European consumers can access ADR systems for transnational as well as national disputes, especially on the on-line market, which is growing rapidly in the EU; notes that the use of ADR systems affords a higher level of consumer rights protection and boosts consumer confidence in the market, businesses and consumer rights protection institutions by making them more attractive, as well as promoting cross-border trade and increasing the prosperity of all operators in the EU market;
– neodvisnost, nepristranskost in zaupnost : pri imenovanju mediatorjev je treba preprečiti možnost pojava navzkrižja interesov; uspešen temelj za zagotavljanje nepristranskih odločitev je načelo sodelovanja oseb iz združenj potrošnikov in predstavniških organizacij podjetij;
– independence, impartiality and confidentiality : when mediators are being designated, the possibility of conflicts of interest arising should be avoided; the principle of joint participation by members of consumer associations and organisations representing companies could serve as a useful basis for ensuring the impartiality of the outcome;
– usposobljenost : pristojni strokovnjaki morajo imeti strokovne sposobnosti, izobrazbo in izkušnje za opravljanje funkcije in morajo biti nepristranski, neodvisni in kompetentni;
– competence : the professionals in charge must have the specialist ability, training and experience to perform their role and must be impartial, independent and competent;
– učinkovitost in hitrost : mediatorji morajo imeti na voljo zadostna sredstva (ustrezne človeške, materialne in finančne vire) in biti sposobni upoštevati kratek rok med začetkom postopka in sprejetjem odločitve;
– efficiency and speed : mediators must have adequate means at their disposal (appropriate human, material and financial resources) and be able meet the short deadlines between referral and decision;
– enakost potrošnikov in strokovnjakov glede informacij, pa tudi konceptualno in postopkovno, ter dvostranske izmenjave, kar pomeni, da lahko obe strani izrazita svoje stališče ter se seznanita s stališčem druge strani in dejstvi, ki jih ta predstavi;
– equity between consumers and professionals, in terms of information as well as conceptually and procedurally, and two-way exchanges, i.e. the two parties being able to express their position and to familiarise themselves with the position and the facts stated by the other;
– financiranje : vprašanje stroškov alternativnega reševanja sporov je treba rešiti, da se zagotovi privlačnost takega načina za stranke; ob tem bi moral biti sistem brezplačen za stranko, ki v zadevi zmaga, ali pa bi moral za potrošniku predstavljati zelo zmeren strošek;
– funding : the issue of the cost of ADR should be resolved in order to ensure that such an option is attractive to the parties concerned; with this in mind, the system should be free, if a case is won, or offered at a very moderate cost to the consumer;
– svoboda izbire in zunajsodni značaj postopka : alternativno reševanje sporov mora biti izbirno in temeljiti na spoštovanju svobodne izbire strank v celotnem postopku, tako da imajo vedno možnost, da spor rešijo pred sodiščem; istočasno je treba zagotoviti, da si stranki resnično prizadevata za uspešno mediacijo; alternativno reševanje sporov nikakor ne sme biti prva obvezna faza pred začetkom sodnega postopka, odločitve, sprejete v okviru takega reševanja, pa so lahko zavezujoče le, če so bile stranke o tem predhodno obveščene in so to izrecno sprejele; kljub taki odločitvi, morata stranki še vedno imeti možnost, da se odločita za sodno obravnavo;
– freedom of choice and out-of-court nature : ADR must be optional and based on respect for the parties’ freedom of choice throughout the process, allowing them the possibility of choosing, at any time, to settle their dispute before the courts; at the same time, guarantees must be provided that genuine efforts are being made to achieve successful mediation; it must not under any circumstances constitute an initial compulsory step prior to the initiation of legal proceedings, and the decision stemming from it can be binding only if the parties have been informed to that effect beforehand and expressly agree to it; despite such a decision, it must still be possible for the parties to opt for a court hearing;
– sorazmernost postopkov, sklepov in stroškov, da se prepreči, da bi njihov učinek presegel predmet in težo spora; nastali stroški morajo biti prilagojeni povzročeni škodi;
– proportionality of the procedures, decisions and costs, to avoid their impact exceeding the objective and content of the dispute; the costs borne must be in proportion to the damage incurred;
– preglednost : poleg zagotavljanja splošnih informacij (vrsta pravnega spora, pravila za začetek postopka, podrobna pravila za sprejemanje odločitev itd.) mora vsaka oseba, ki deluje kot mediator, obvezno objaviti letno poročilo;
– transparency : besides providing general information (types of lawsuit, rules on referral, decision-taking arrangements, etc.), any person acting as a mediator must be obliged to publish an annual report;
34. meni, da je obveščanje potrošnikov odgovornost, ki si jo delijo javni organi, mreže za obveščanje in svetovanje, regulativni organi in združenja potrošnikov, ter jim priporoča, naj vsak na svoji ravni izvede kampanje ozaveščanja in pilotne projekte o tej temi;
Takes the view that the provision of information to consumers is a responsibility shared by public authorities, information and advisory networks, regulators and consumer groups, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
38. kot mogočo spodbudo za podjetja priporoča, naj se na evropski ravni uvede znak kakovosti, povezan z mediacijo v potrošniških sporih, za katero bi se sprejele smernice o najboljših praksah, tako da bi lahko potrošniki hitro določili podjetja, ki so se odločila za sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov. meni, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem predlogom izvesti analizo stroškov in koristi; poudarja, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti, da se znak pravilno uporablja in uveljavlja;
Recommends, as a potential incentive for enterprises, that a quality label for mediation be introduced in relation to mediation in consumer disputes, which would be associated with guidelines recognising best practices, so that consumers can rapidly identify businesses that have opted into ADR systems; takes the view that a cost-benefit analysis should be carried out first on this proposal; stresses that the Commission should ensure that the label is properly used and enforced;
40. sočasno poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma sprejme ukrepe za ozaveščanje potrošnikov in podjetij o obstoječih zakonodajnih instrumentih, kot so Uredba (ES) št. 861/2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti, Direktiva 2008/52/ES o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah in Uredba (ES) št. 805/2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov; s tem namenom predlaga, naj se v obsežne informacijske kampanje vključijo nacionalni organi, sodišča, odvetniške in gospodarske zbornice, uradi za svetovanje potrošnikom, zavarovatelji stroškov postopka ter druge pristojne organizacije; poziva, naj se zagotovi finančna podpora za tovrstne kampanje na evropski in nacionalni ravni;
Calls on the Commission, at the same time, to take immediate steps to ensure that consumers and businesses are made more aware of existing legislative instruments, such as Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure, Directive 2008/52/EC on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters and Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims; with that aim in view, proposes that national authorities, courts, bar associations and chambers of commerce, consumer advice bureaux, legal expenses insurers and other competent organisations should be involved in a comprehensive information campaign; calls for financial support to be provided for European and national campaigns of this kind;
43. poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami izvede informacijske kampanje, usmerjene v izobraževanje in ozaveščanje potrošnikov in podjetij o prednostih uporabe tega instituta;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to undertake information campaigns aimed at educating, and raising the awareness of, both consumers and businesses with regard to the benefits of using this institution;
45. meni, da je obveščanje podjetij odgovornost, ki si jo delijo javni organi in predstavniške organizacije, ter jim priporoča, naj vsak na svoji ravni izvede kampanje osveščanja in pilotne projekte o tej temi;
Takes the view that the provision of information to businesses is a responsibility shared by public authorities and representative organisations, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
Pripravljavec mnenja (*): Robert Rochefort
Rapporteur (*): Robert Rochefort
A. ker je alternativno reševanje sporov mehanizem zunajsodnega reševanja, ki potrošniku in trgovcu pomaga rešiti spor s pomočjo tretjega (mediator, arbiter),
A. whereas alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is a mechanism for reaching out-of-court settlements by helping consumers and traders to resolve conflicts through the intervention of a third party (mediator or arbitrator),
B. ker državljani EU slabo poznajo in razumejo sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov po Evropi ter samo majhen delež državljanov ve, kako vložiti zahtevek pri organu za alternativno reševanje sporov,
B. whereas the EU citizen’s knowledge and understanding of ADR schemes throughout Europe is low and confused, with only a small percentage of citizens knowing how to file a claim with an ADR body,
C. ker je pomembno, da se zagotovi boljše seznanjanje z obstojem alternativnega reševanja sporov in da se naredi več za spodbujanje potrošnikov in strokovnjakov k uporabi takega reševanja kot alternative za sodne postopke, ki omogoča izognitev soočenju in ponuja možnost rešitve, ugodne za vse udeležene;
C. whereas it is important to assure better publicising of the existence of ADR mechanisms and to do more to encourage consumers and professionals to use them as an alternative to court proceedings, in order to make it possible to avoid a confrontational approach and offer the prospect of a win-win situation,
D. ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu
D. having regard to its resolution of 6 April 2011 on ‘Governance and Partnership in the Single Market’
P7_TA-PROV(2011)0144 . , v kateri je Komisijo pozval, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnih načinov reševanja sporov,
P7_TA-PROV(2011)0144 . , in which it called on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution in the EU by the end of 2011,
E. ker je razvoj zakonodaje o alternativnem reševanju sporov del dvanajstih pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja v okviru Akta za enotni trg, ki ga je Komisija sprejela 13. aprila 2011,
E. whereas the development of legislation on ADR is one of the twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence in the context of the Single Market Act, as set out in the communication adopted by the Commission on 13 April 2011,
1. poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2011 predloži zakonodajni predlog o uporabi alternativnega reševanja potrošniških sporov v Uniji, in poudarja, da je treba ta predlog hitro sprejeti;
Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal on the use of alternative dispute resolution for consumer matters in the EU by the end of 2011 and emphasises the importance of its swift adoption;
5. se strinja s Komisijo, da ustrezen dostop do odškodnine na notranjem trgu zahteva hkrati možnost preproste uporabe alternativnega reševanja sporov in tudi učinkovit sistem kolektivne tožbe, saj se dopolnjujeta in medsebojno ne izključujeta;
Agrees with the Commission that appropriate access to reparation in the internal market requires both the possibility of easy recourse to ADR and the existence of an effective system for collective claims, the two being complementary and not mutually exclusive ;
– učinkovitost in hitrost : mediatorji morajo imeti na voljo zadostna sredstva (ustrezne človeške, materialne in finančne vire) in biti sposobni upoštevati kratek rok med začetkom postopka in sprejetjem odločitve ;
– efficiency and speed : mediators must have adequate means at their disposal (appropriate human, material and financial resources) and be able meet the short deadlines between referral and decision;
– svoboda izbire in zunajsodni značaj postopka : alternativno reševanje sporov mora biti izbirno in temeljiti na spoštovanju svobodne izbire strank v celotnem postopku, tako da imajo vedno možnost, da spor rešijo pred sodiščem; sočasno je treba zagotoviti, da si stranki resnično prizadevata za uspešno mediacijo; alternativno reševanje sporov nikakor ne sme biti prva obvezna faza pred začetkom sodnega postopka, odločitve, sprejete v okviru takega reševanja, pa so lahko zavezujoče le, če so bile stranke o tem predhodno obveščene in so to izrecno sprejele; kljub taki odločitvi, morata stranki še vedno imeti možnost, da se odločita za sodno obravnavo ;
– freedom of choice and out-of-court nature : ADR must be optional and based on respect for the parties’ freedom of choice throughout the process, allowing them the possibility of choosing, at any time, to settle their dispute before the courts; at the same time, guarantees must be provided that genuine efforts are being made to achieve successful meditation; it must not under any circumstances constitute an initial compulsory step prior to the initiation of legal proceedings, and the decision stemming from it can be binding only if the parties have been informed to that effect beforehand and expressly agree to it; despite such a decision, it must still be possible for the parties to opt for a court hearing;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči formulacijo „alternativno reševanje sporov kot sredstvo za reševanje sporov, povezanih s trgovinskimi transakcijami in praksami v Evropski uniji“, ki jo je težko jasno razumeti; priporoča poenostavitev izraza, večji poudarek na razlikovanju med to možnostjo in izvedbo sodnega postopka ter pojasnitev dejstva, da se ta vrsta pravnega sredstva uporablja zlasti za potrošniške spore;
Calls on the Commission to look into the wording of the designation ‘alternative dispute settlement as a means to resolve disputes related to commercial transactions and practices in the EU’, as it is somewhat impenetrable and does not lend itself to effective communication; recommends that the designation be simplified in order to create a clearer distinction between this concept and that of recourse to the courts, and to clarify that it concerns in particular disputes relating to consumer matters;
12. poziva Komisijo, naj podpre, okrepi in celo podeli več pristojnosti za delovanje organom, ki že obstajajo na tem področju, delujejo učinkovito in so dokazali svojo vrednost, kot so SOLVIT, Europe Direct, ECC-Net in FIN-NET;
Calls on the Commission to support and strengthen, and enhance the capabilities of, existing bodies operating in this area which have demonstrated their effectiveness and value, such as SOLVIT, Europe Direct, ECC-NET and FIN-NET;
15. meni, da je obveščanje potrošnikov odgovornost, ki si jo delijo javni organi in predstavniške organizacije, ter jim priporoča, naj vsak na svoji ravni izvede kampanje ozaveščanja in pilotne projekte o tej temi;
Takes the view that the provision of information to consumers is a responsibility shared by public authorities and representative organisations, and recommends that they each, at their respective level, conduct awareness-raising campaigns and pilot projects on the subject;
19. poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami izvede informacijske kampanje, usmerjene v izobraževanje in ozaveščanje potrošnikov in podjetij o prednostih uporabe tega instituta;
Calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to undertake information campaigns aimed at educating, and raising the awareness of, both consumers and businesses with regard to the benefits of using this institution;
21. kot mogočo spodbudo za podjetja priporoča, naj se na evropski ravni uvede znak kakovosti, povezan z mediacijo v potrošniških sporih, za katero bi se sprejele smernice o najboljših praksah, tako da bi lahko potrošniki hitro določili podjetja, ki so se odločila za sisteme alternativnega reševanja sporov; meni, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem predlogom izvesti analizo stroškov in koristi; poudarja, da bi morala Komisija zagotoviti, da se znak pravilno uporablja in uveljavlja.
Recommends, as a potential incentive for enterprises, that a quality label for mediation be introduced in relation to mediation in consumer disputes, which would be associated with guidelines recognising best practices, so that consumers can rapidly identify businesses that have opted into ADR systems; takes the view that a cost-benefit analysis should be carried out first on this proposal; stresses that the Commission should ensure that the label is properly used and enforced;
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Ilijana Ivanova (Iliana Ivanova), Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Gianni Pittella, Phil Prendergast, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Róża grofica Thun und Hohenstein, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Małgorzata Handzlik, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Gianni Pittella, Phil Prendergast, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Catherine Stihler, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Sajjad Karim, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Diana Wallis
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Sajjad Karim, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Diana Wallis
o predlogu sklepa Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic Evropske unije, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o sklenitvi Sporazuma o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi
on the draft Decision of the Council and the representatives of the governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the conclusion of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States and Georgia
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (09185/2011),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (09185/2011),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi (14370/2010),
– having regard to the draft Common Aviation Area Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part (14370/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za odobritev v skladu s členom 100(2), prvim pododstavkom člena 218(8) ter točko (a)(v) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0124/2011 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 100(2), 218(8), first subparagraph, and 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0124/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 81 in člena 90(7) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–0344/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7‑0344/2011 ),
Predlagani sporazum je mednarodni sporazum, ki ureja odnose v zračnem prometu med EU, njenimi državami članicami in Gruzijo.
This agreement is an international one establishing relations in the field of aviation between the EU and its 27 Member States and Georgia.
Cilj sporazuma je vzpostavitev skupnega zračnega prostora med EU in Gruzijo.
Its purpose is the establishment of an EU/Georgia Common Aviation Area.
Nadomestil naj bi sedanji dvostranski sporazum, ki ureja letalske prevoze med obema stranema.
The existing bilateral agreements on air traffic services between the two sides are to be superseded by the new agreement.
To poteka v okviru sosedske politike EU, katere cilj je prav tako vzpostavitev skupnega zračnega prostora med EU in njenimi sosedami.
The agreement is being concluded as part of the EU neighbourhood policy, one of the aims of which is to establish a common aviation area between the EU and its neighbours.
Svet je sporazum podpisal 2. decembra 2010.
The Council signed the agreement on 2 December 2010.