natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva k nadomestitvi lizbonske strategije z "evropsko strategijo za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj", ki bo osredotočena na posebne prednosti gospodarske, socialne in okoljske politike EU in bo spodbujala naložbe:
Calls for the replacing of the Lisbon Strategy by a ‘ European Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development ’ that focuses on the specific strengths of EU economic, social and environmental policies and encourages investment:
(i) v raziskave in inovacije, vsestransko kakovost dela in izboljšanje kvalifikacij za pridobivanje visoko usposobljene in izobražene delovne sile,
(i) in research and innovation, in the quality of work in all its aspects and improving qualifications, in order to achieve a highly trained and educated workforce,
(ii) v osnovno infrastrukturo in infrastrukturo, ki podpira industrijske dejavnosti,
(ii) in basic and industry-supportive infrastructure,
(iii) v javne storitve za izboljšanje njihove kakovosti,
(iii) in public services, in order to improve their quality,
(iv) v varstvo okolja in ekološke tehnologije,
(iv) in the protection of the environment and in eco-technologies,
(v) v izboljšanje delovnih, socialnih, okoljskih in varnostnih standardov, ki bodo omogočali usklajevanje na najvišji ravni,
(v) in improving labour, social, environmental and safety standards, in order to achieve harmonisation to meet the highest standards,
(vi) v socialno gospodarstvo;
(vi) in the social economy;
meni, da je lahko okoljska politika pomemben gospodarski potencial za posredno in neposredno ustvarjanje velikega števila delovnih mest, če se inovacije in industrijska politika osredotočajo na spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja,
Considers that the environmental policy can represent a major economic opportunity to create jobs both directly and indirectly on a large scale if innovation and industrial policies are focused on the promotion of sustainable development;
Ocena nacionalnih programov reform in letno poročilo o napredku v luči spomladanskega zasedanja Evropskega sveta 2006
Evaluation of the national reform programmes and the Annual Progress Report in view of the Spring 2006 European Council
poudarja, da so lizbonski program Skupnosti in nacionalni programi reform v okviru revidirane lizbonske strategije instrumenti, s katerimi se bodo spodbujale in upravičevale strukturne reforme v vseh državah članicah, zlasti glede trga dela in socialne varnosti, kar bo imelo resne ekonomske in socialne posledice, ki jih bodo integrirane smernice in pakt stabilnosti in rasti še okrepili;
Stresses that the Community Lisbon Programme and the national reform programmes in the framework of the revised Lisbon Strategy are a tool to provide national justification for and push forward the same structural reforms in all the Member States, in particular as regards the labour market and social security, which will have serious economic and social consequences, strengthened even more by the integrated guidelines and the Stability and Growth Pact;
je seznanjen z letnim poročilom Komisije o napredku in obžaluje njeno pristranskost pri glavnih prednostnih nalogah za sprostitev poslovnega potenciala in zasebnih naložb, ki jo kaže:
Takes note of the Commission’s Annual Progress Report and regrets the bias that the Commission shows in its fundamental priorities towards unlocking business potential and private investment, namely by:
(i) z upravičevanjem nadaljnje privatizacije na področju socialne varnosti, zmanjševanja socialnih ugodnosti in zviševanja zakonske in dejanske upokojitvene starosti,
(i) providing justification to further privatise social security, reduce social benefits and increase the statutory and effective retirement age,
(ii) z vztrajanjem pri povečevanju prožnosti trga dela z novim konceptom „prožne varnosti“ skupaj z zaposljivostjo,
(ii) insisting on further flexibility in the labour market with the new concept of ‘flexicurity’ on a par with ‘employability’,
(iii) z vezavo naložb v raziskave, razvoj in izobraževanje na razpoloženje prostega trga ter posledično z upravičevanjem izkoriščanja znanja in raziskav,
(iii) connecting investment in research and development and education to the whims of the free market and thus justifying the commoditisation of knowledge and research,
(iv) z vztrajanjem pri liberalizaciji energetskih trgov in dajanjem prevelike prednosti dokončanju notranjega trga storitev;
(iv) insisting on the liberalisation of the energy markets and giving overarching priority to the conclusion of the internal market in services;
obžaluje nov koncept „prožne varnosti“, ki ga je uvedla Komisija in je opredeljen kot kombinacija dovolj prilagodljivih pogodb o delu s politikami trga delovne sile, ki podpirajo menjave delovnih mest; meni, da lahko potegnemo vzporednico med tem konceptom in konceptom „zaposljivosti“, ki odgovornost za pridobitev zaposlitve prepušča delavcu; poudarja, da oba koncepta spodbujata deregulacijo dela in liberalizacijo začasne brezposelnosti, s čimer ogrožata socialno kohezijo in kakovost dela;
Regrets the new concept of ‘flexicurity’ introduced by the Commission, which is defined as combining sufficiently flexible work contracts with coupled labour market polices that support switches from one job to another; considers that this concept is in parallel with the ‘employability’ concept that puts the responsibility for getting a job on the worker; stresses that both concepts promote labour deregulation and the liberalisation of lay-offs, putting social cohesion and quality of work at stake;
je močno zaskrbljen, ker so glavne smernice druge generacije nacionalnih strateških programov za trajnostne pokojnine v prid privatizaciji socialnega skrbstva, zviševanju upokojitvene starosti in zniževanju ravni prejemkov; obžaluje, da Komisija vztraja pri nadaljnjem utiranju poti za t. i. „modernizacijo“ sistemov socialne varnosti;
Is deeply concerned at the fact that the main guidelines of the second generation national strategy programmes for sustainable pensions are biased towards the privatisation of welfare, the increase of the pension age and the reduction in the level of benefits; regrets that the Commission insists in further paving the way for the so-called ‘modernisation’ of social protection systems;
meni, da je pritisk, ki ga Komisija in Svet v okviru lizbonske strategije izvajata za nadaljnjo razgradnjo oz. privatizacijo javnega pokojninskega sistema in zvišanje zakonske in dejanske upokojitvene starosti, neupravičen; zavrača vsak poskus zviševanja zakonske upokojitvene starosti;
Considers unjustified the pressures of the Commission and the Council through the Lisbon Strategy to further dismantle/privatise the public pensions pillar and increase the effective and statutory retirement age; rejects any attempt to increase the statutory retirement age;
obžaluje, da je glede osmih ključnih ukrepov EU, ki jih je Komisija predstavila lani, prednost namenjena dokončanju notranjega trga storitev in odobritvi Bolkesteinove direktive; ponovno izraža svojo odločenost upoštevati gospodarski pomen storitvenega sektorja za evropsko gospodarstvo in ustvarjanje delovnih mest, vendar meni, da liberalizacija storitev povečuje deregulacijo dela, socialni in okoljski damping ter ogroža javne storitve, delovna mesta ter socialne pravice in pravice potrošnikov; zavrača Bolkensteinovo direktivo in poziva Komisijo, da umakne svoj predlog direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu;
Regrets that on the eight key EU measures presented by the Commission last year, priority is given to the completion of the internal market for services and the approval of the ‘Bolkestein Directive’; reiterates its determination to take into account the economic importance of the services sector for the European economy and job creation, but takes the view that the liberalisation of services promotes labour de-regulation, social and environmental dumping, and jeopardises public services, jobs and social and consumer rights; rejects the ‘Bolkestein Directive’ and calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal for a directive on services in the internal market;
poudarja, da obstaja nasprotje med spodbujanjem prožnega trga dela in nestalnimi oblikami zaposlitve ter potrebo po spodbujanju kakovosti vseh vidikov dela; ugotavlja, da je reformam trga dela sledil upad rasti produktivnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi sporočilo o povezavah med kakovostjo dela in produktivnostjo;
Stresses that there is a contradiction between promoting a flexible labour market and precarious jobs and the need to promote the quality of work in all its aspects; notes that the labour market reforms have been followed by a decline in productivity growth; calls on the Commission to produce a communication on the links between the quality of work and productivity;
opozarja na globoko zakoreninjen boj in upor delavcev, potrošnikov in uporabnikov javnih storitev proti trenutnemu procesu liberalizacije in reformam dela in socialne varnosti, ter poziva Evropski svet, naj na spomladanskem zasedanju to upošteva in uporabi predloge sindikatov, organizacij potrošnikov in zvez uporabnikov javnih storitev;
Draws attention to the deep-rooted struggle and resistance of workers, consumers and public-service users against the ongoing process of liberalisation and labour and social security reforms, and calls on the Spring European Council to take this into account and to incorporate the proposals being put forward by trade unions, consumers’ organisations and public-service users’ associations;
obžaluje, da je Komisija v svojem sporočilu, tako kot v spomladanskem poročilu za leto 2005, popolnoma zanemarila socialno agendo – strategijo socialnega vključevanja v boju proti revščini in socialni izključenosti;
Regrets that the Commission completely neglected the social agenda – namely the social inclusion strategy in the fight against poverty and social exclusion – in its communication, as it did its Spring Report for 2005;
obžaluje, da večina nacionalnih programov reform ne omenja strategije socialnega vključevanja, čeprav je to eden izmed stebrov socialne agende in lizbonske strategije, določene marca 2000; ugotavlja da v razširjeni EU revščina ogroža 72 milijonov ljudi; poziva Evropski svet, naj na spomladanskem zasedanju določi ambiciozen cilj prepolovitve stopnje revščine v EU do leta 2010 in prepolovitve ravni neenakosti plač, kot jo prikazuje kazalec S80/S20;
Regrets that the most of the national reform programmes do not mention the social inclusion strategy, in spite of it being one of the pillars of the social agenda and the Lisbon Strategy established in March 2000; notes that 72 million people in the enlarged EU are at risk from poverty; calls on the Spring European Council to set an ambitious target to halve the EU’s poverty rate by 2010 and to halve the level of income inequalities as expressed by the S80/S20 indicator;
obžaluje, da se večina nacionalnih programov reform osredotoča le na zagotavljanje novih delovnih mest, pri čemer pa zanemarja drugo plat medalje – njihovo kakovost; poudarja, da spodbujanje kakovosti vseh vidikov dela v letnem poročilu o napredku ali v nacionalnih programih reform ni bilo primerno obravnavano, in meni, da bi moralo to biti prednostna naloga EU, saj je tesno povezano s kakovostjo življenja, socialno vključenostjo in produktivnostjo; poziva Evropski svet, naj na spomladanskem zasedanju oblikuje cilj, da bo polovica zaposlenih v EU s pogodbami za določen čas do leta 2010 dobila pogodbo za nedoločen čas;
Regrets that most of the national reform programmes concentrate only on ‘more’ jobs, neglecting ‘better’ jobs – the other side of the coin; stresses that the promotion of quality of work in all its aspects has not been properly tackled in the Annual Progress Report or in the national reform programmes and considers that this should be a priority for the EU because it is deeply connected with the quality of life, social inclusion and productivity; calls on the Spring European Council to establish as a target that half of the EU percentage of employees with fixed-term contracts will have a permanent contract by 2010;
priznava pomen javnih storitev in njihove dostopnosti za spodbujanje socialne, ekonomske in regionalne kohezije v Evropski uniji; odločno oporeka predsodkom proti državi kot ponudniku storitev splošnega interesa in poziva, naj z javnimi dobrinami upravlja javni sektor;
Recognises the importance of public services and the provision thereof for the promotion of social, economic and regional cohesion in the European Union; strongly criticises the bias against the state as a provider of services of general interest and calls for public goods to be placed under the management of the public sector;
poudarja, da se mora EU odločno zavzeti za skrajšanje delovnega časa brez znižanja plač, s čimer bo ustvarila nova delovna mesta in povečala produktivnost; poziva Komisijo, da umakne predlog o dopolnitvi direktive o delovnem času;
Stresses that the EU needs a strong commitment to working-time reduction, without lowering wages, to create new employment and increase productivity; calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal on the revision of the working time directive;
meni, da so trenutne ocene stroškovne učinkovitosti ali ocene konkurenčnosti, predlagane s pobudo za „boljšo zakonodajo“, pristranske in v prid poslovnim interesom, njihov glavni cilj pa je umik vsakega dela zakonodaje, ki ogroža konkurenčnost ali poslovno donosnost; meni, da presoja vplivov ne bi smela postavljati pod vprašaj začetnih ciljev predlagane ali uveljavljene zakonodaje, in sicer varstva socialnih in okoljskih pravic ter pravic delavcev in potrošnikov;
Considers that current cost-effectiveness assessments or ‘competitiveness’ assessments as proposed under the ‘better legislation’ initiative are biased towards business interests and have as a main goal the withdrawal of any legislation that jeopardises competition or business profitability; considers that impact assessments should not put into question the initial objectives of proposed or established legislation, namely the protection of labour, social, environmental and consumer rights;
Na poti do solidarnosti in socialne agende
Towards a Solidarity and Social Agenda
poudarja, da si mora za oblikovanje širše koalicije, naklonjene spremembam, lizbonska strategija prizadevati za boljše, ne pa šibkejše sisteme socialnega skrbstva (ne da bi ogrozili temeljne pravice do upokojitve, nadomestila zaradi bolezni ali nezaposlenosti ter pridobljene pravice in nadomestila) ter spodbujati trg dela, ki daje prednost kakovosti dela in pravični prerazdelitvi dobička iz proizvodnje;
Insists that, in order to build a broad coalition for change, the Lisbon Strategy must seek to improve, rather than weaken, welfare systems (without jeopardising the fundamental right to retirement, sickness and unemployment provision or acquired rights and benefits) and to promote labour markets which prioritise the quality of work and a fair redistribution of productive gains, and must not exert downward pressure on social and environmental standards;
poudarja, da je trajnostni sistem socialne varnosti najlažje zagotoviti z doseganjem polne zaposlenosti s pravicami, napredno politiko plač in popolno integracijo/legalizacijo delavcev migrantov, enakopravnejšo porazdelitvijo dohodkov, zadostno rastjo produktivnosti in usklajenim bojem proti delu na črno; meni, da je treba zagotoviti in povečati prispevke delodajalcev za socialno varnost; poudarja, da je treba poiskati nove instrumente za financiranje javnih sistemov socialnega varstva, na primer s posebnim obdavčenjem transakcij na kapitalskih trgih ali z viri, ki temeljijo na dodani vrednosti podjetij;
Stresses that the best way to tackle sustainability of social security is through the achievement of full employment with rights, a progressive wage policy, and the full integration/legalisation of migrant workers, a more egalitarian distribution of incomes, sufficient productivity growth and a coordinated fight against undeclared work; considers that it is important to ensure and increase employers’ contributions to social security; stresses the need to find new instruments to finance public social security schemes, for instance with special taxes on capital market transactions or a resource based on the firm’s added value;
poudarja pomen novega programa socialne politike z naslednjimi cilji:
Stresses the importance of a new social policy agenda whose objectives should be the following:
meni, da demografske spremembe zahtevajo novo in izboljšano izobraževalno in družbeno infrastrukturo tako za mlade kot za starejše, vključno z boljšimi možnostmi za vseživljenjsko učenje, cenovno ugodnim otroškim varstvom, zdravstveno nego in nego starejših; opozarja države članice, da so se na barcelonskem vrhu leta 2002 zavezale, da bodo do leta 2010 omogočile dnevno otroško varstvo več kot 33 % otrok, mlajših od treh let, in 90 % otrok, starih od treh let do šoloobvezne starosti;
Notes the need for enhanced educational and social infrastructures for young and elderly people alike, including increased facilities for life-long learning, affordable childcare, nursing care and care for the elderly; reminds the Member States of the commitment that they entered into at the Barcelona Summit in 2002 whereby, by 2010, they are to provide day-care places for more than 33% of children under the age of three and for 90% of children between the age of three and school-starting age;
se strinja, da so potrebni ukrepi za doseganje enakopravnosti žensk in moških (recimo enaka plača, starševski dopust, dostop do kakovostne zaposlitve), za doseganje boljših pogojev za uskladitev dela in zasebnega življenja, tudi med različnimi fazami poklicnega življenja, ter za izboljšanje obsega in kakovosti infrastrukture, povezane z izobraževanjem in nego vzdrževanih oseb;
Stresses that policies are needed to achieve equality for women and men (e.g. equal pay, parental leave, access to quality employment) and to create better conditions for reconciling employment and private life, also during different phases of working life, and to improve the quantity and quality of infrastructures related to the education and care of dependants;
vztraja, da so potrebni ukrepi za podpiranje enakosti in boj proti diskriminaciji, zlasti prek novih zakonodajnih pobud, katerih namen je izvajanje 13. člena Pogodbe na področju pravic žensk, priseljencev in invalidov; poudarja tudi, da je treba okrepiti povezavo med Evropskim socialnim skladom in nacionalnimi akcijskimi načrti za zaposlovanje in družbeno vključenost, da se za slednje zagotovi potrebna sredstva ter omogoči resnično sodelovanje nacionalnih vlad, nevladnih organizacij, ki delujejo na zgornjih področjih, ter partnerjev na trgu dela;
Insists on the need for measures to promote equality and combat discrimination, notably via new legislative initiatives aimed at implementing Article 13 of the Treaty in the sphere of the rights of women, immigrants and persons with disabilities; also points to the need to strengthen the link between the European Social Fund and the national action plans for employment and social inclusion so as to provide the necessary funding for the latter and ensure that national parliaments, NGOs active in the above areas and labour-market players can genuinely participate;
se sklicuje na strategijo Komisije za ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest, zlasti s spodbujanjem lokalnih storitev s sedežem v skupnosti, javnih, socialnih, osebnih in kulturnih storitev ter poklicev na področju varstva okolja; meni, da bi se morala ta strategija osredotočiti tudi na kakovost ustvarjenih delovnih mest, da to ne bi pripeljalo do ustvarjanja "mini-zaposlitev";
Recalls the Commission strategy for new sources of jobs, in particular by promoting local Community-based services, public services, social services, personal services, cultural services and environmental professions; considers that this strategy should also focus on the quality of the jobs created so that this does not result in the creation of ‘mini-jobs’;
meni, da bi morale politike priseljevanja podpirati uspešno gospodarsko in socialno vključevanje priseljencev, kar lahko prispeva k vzdržnosti sistema socialne varnosti; meni, da je uspeh politike zakonitega priseljevanja odvisen tudi od izvajanja celovite in proaktivne strategije za doseganje popolne integracije, ki bi obsegala vrsto družbenih, gospodarskih in državljanskih ukrepov;
Considers that immigration policies should promote successful economic and social integration of migrants, which could also contribute to the sustainability of social security; considers that a successful policy of immigration also depends on the implementation of a comprehensive and proactive strategy to achieve full integration, covering a range of social, economic and civic measures;
Nadaljnje vlaganje v raziskave, izobraževanje in inovacije
Further investment in research, education and innovation
meni, da so ekološke inovacije ter raziskovalno in razvojno delo pomembni pri uresničevanju splošne politike trajnostnega razvoja in da prispevajo k ustvarjanju bogastva in delovnih mest; poudarja pomen javnega financiranja osnovnih in uporabnih raziskav za doseganje teh ciljev;
Believes that eco-innovation and R&D are important for achieving the overall policy of sustainable development and contribute to wealth creation and jobs; stresses the importance of publicly-financed basic and applied research to this end;
poudarja, da je treba ekspanzivno makroekonomsko politiko usmerjati v spodbujanje ekoloških inovacij, saj bo trajnostni razvoj možen le, če bo povečanje povpraševanja in gospodarsko rast spremljalo zmanjšanje porabe energije in surovin;
Stresses that an expansionary macro-economic policy must be geared towards promoting eco-innovation, because sustainable development will only be possible if increased demand and economic growth can be linked to strong reductions in the use of energy and raw materials;
meni, da morajo biti naložbe v raziskave in razvoj usmerjene k izboljšanju kakovosti življenja in spodbujanju trajnostnega razvoja ter da se mora 7. okvirni raziskovalni program (2007–2013) osredotočiti na družbene vede, informacijsko družbo (vključno s programsko opremo, temelječo na brezplačni odprti kodi), preventivno in javno zdravstveno varstvo, varnost hrane, nadzor nad kemikalijami, ekološke tehnologije in dejavnosti, povezane s trajnostnim razvojem, na primer obnovljive vire energije in okolju prijazno kmetijstvo, kot je pridelava biohrane;
Considers that R&D investment should be geared to improving the quality of life and promoting sustainable development, and that the Seventh Framework Programme for Research 2007-2013 should focus on social sciences, the information society (including free and open-source software), preventive and public healthcare, food safety, control of chemicals, eco-technologies, sustainable development-related activities such as renewable energy and environmentally-friendly agriculture, such as organic farming;
meni, da bi morala EU te strateške prednostne naloge uresničevati z okrepitvijo svojih zmogljivosti za inovacije in raziskave, ter v zvezi s tem obžaluje zmanjšanja sredstev za to področje, ki ga je decembrski Evropski svet predlagal v okviru finančne perspektive 2007 - 2013;
Believes that the EU should translate these strategic priorities by reinforcing its innovation and research capacity, and, in this context, regrets the cuts made in this area by the December European Council in its proposal for the 2007-2013 financial perspective;
poziva države članice, naj podvojijo prizadevanja za politiko, ki bi spodbujala inovacije v srednje velikih podjetjih, pa tudi v 20 milijonih evropskih malih podjetij, ki največ prispevajo h gospodarski rasti in ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest v Evropi; meni, da je večja dostopnost 7. okvirnega programa raziskav za mala in srednje velika podjetja ključnega pomena za okrepitev njihove zmožnosti ustvarjanja delovnih mest;
Invites the Member States to redouble efforts on policy to encourage innovation in medium-sized enterprises, but also in the 20 million European small businesses which are spearheading economic growth and job creation in Europe; considers improved access for SMEs to the Seventh Framework Programme for Research as crucial for strengthening SMEs’ capacity to create jobs;