natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vpliv prispevkov iz ESPG po starostni skupini v upravičenih državah članicah in sektorjih;
the impact of contributions from the EGF by age group in benefiting Member States and sectors;
poziva Komisijo, da v svojem vmesnem pregledu s proračunskega stališča oceni dodeljene prispevke, in odrazi svoje ugotovitve še zlasti v zvezi:
Calls on the Commission to evaluate in its interim review the contributions granted from the budgetary point of view, and reflect its findings with particular reference to:
z razlogi za večje razlike med sredstvi, ki so bila zahtevana iz ESPG, in zneski, ki so jih vrnile države članice upravičenke, ko se je pomoč že zaključila;
the reasons for the large disparity between the resources requested from the EGF and the amounts reimbursed by the beneficiary Member States when the assistance is already concluded;
s primeri, kjer so države članice že izvedle vračilo, kjer financirani programi in ukrepi niso bili izvedeni;
in the cases where Member States have made reimbursements, which were the financed programmes and measures not executed;
z razlogi za velike razlike med državami članicami glede financiranja na delavca v različnih vlogah za ESPG;
the reasons for the large disparities between Member States in terms of the funding provided per worker in the different EGF applications;
z analizo usklajevanja med različnimi programi, ki jih financira Evropa (vključno s pomočjo ESS), ki so bili dodeljeni isti regiji, kjer se vloge za ESPG obravnavajo in/ali so bile že obravnavane;
an analysis of coordination between the various European-financed programmes (including ESF assistance) which have been allocated to the same region where EGF applications are being considered and/or their consideration has been concluded;
z analizo razmerja celotnega financiranja, ki ga je Komisija namenila v odnosu do drugih nacionalnih ali podjetjem lastnih podpornih ukrepov;
an analysis of the proportion of overall funding that the Commission accounted for in relation to other national and company-specific support measures;
meni, da mora revizija uredbe upoštevati rezultate ocene delovanja ESPG kot tudi pridobljene izkušnje, in bi morala uvesti ukrepe, ki bi omogočili znatno zmanjšanje časa trajanja postopka za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG;
Considers that, when the regulation is revised, due account should be taken of the findings of the evaluation of the EGF's functioning and of the experience gained, and measures that will substantially reduce the length of the EGF mobilisation procedure should be introduced;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga, da se v uredbo ESPG za države članice doda obveza, da morajo v času izvajanja uredbe podpirati udeležbo združenj delavcev; poziva Komisijo, naj organizira izmenjavo izkušenj in dobrih praks glede udeležbe delavcev pri izvajanju ESPG, da bodo delavci v sedanjih in prihodnjih primerih lahko izkoristili strokovno znanje iz preteklih primerov;
Calls on the Commission to propose the addition to the EGF Regulation of an obligation for Member States to support the participation of a workers' association during the implementation phase; calls on the Commission to organise exchanges of experiences and good practices concerning workers' involvement in the implementation of the EGF, so that workers in existing and new cases may benefit from the expertise gained in previous cases;
poudarja, da se lahko čas, ki se potrebuje za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG, prepolovi, če se oblikujejo in sprejmejo naslednji ukrepi:
Underlines that the time required to mobilise the EGF could be halved if the following measures are formulated and adopted:
države članice pripravijo vlogo za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG že ob napovedi namena kolektivnega odpuščanja in ne šele po njegovi uresničitvi;
applications for mobilisation of the EGF should be drawn up by Member States as soon as a collective redundancy has been announced, and not after it has taken place;
Komisija obvesti države članice, da mora biti vloga predložena od prvega dne dalje, ko so merila za pomoč izpolnjena;
the Commission should inform Member States that an application could be presented from the first day when the intervention criteria have been fulfilled;
vsa sredstva bi morala biti na voljo za zagotovitev hitre in okrepljene komunikacije z državami članicami, ki sodelujejo v tem procesu;
all means should be made available to ensure swift and enhanced communication with the Member State concerned in this process;
vloge držav članic v svojem jeziku in v enem izmed delovnih jezikov evropskih institucij bi lahko službi Komisije, ki je zadolžena za pregled vlog, omogočila takojšen začetek dela;
applications by Member States in their own language and one of the European institutions' working languages could help the Commission department responsible for scrutinising applications to do so without delay;
Komisija bi morala imeti potrebne človeške vire in tehnične zmožnost, ob spoštovanju načel proračunske nevtralnosti, za učinkovito in hitro obravnavo vlog, ki so jih predložile države članice;
the Commission should have the necessary human and technical capacities, respecting the principles of budgetary neutrality, to effectively and swiftly process the applications submitted by Member States;
Komisija bi morala odločiti o uporabi sredstev iz ESPG v obdobju treh, štirih mesecev po prejetju vloge, vključno z vsemi potrebnimi informacijami, iz države članice; v primerih, kjer presoja vloge lahko traja več kot štiri mesece, pa bi morala Komisija čim prej obvestiti Evropski parlament in navesti razloge za takšno zamudo;
the Commission should take decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF within 3-4 months after having received the application, including all necessary information, from the Member State; in cases where the assessment of an application might take longer than 4 months, the Commission should inform the EP as soon as possible and state the reasons for such a delay;
poziva Komisijo, naj državam članicam ponudi niz smernic za oblikovanje in izvajanje vlog za uporabo sredstev ESPG, da bo zagotovila hiter postopek oddaje vlog in široko soglasje med interesnimi skupinami glede strategije, ki naj se uporabi, in ukrepov, ki naj se jih sprejme, za učinkovito ponovno vključevanje delavcev na trg dela; poziva države članice, naj pospešijo postopek z vnaprejšnjim financiranjem ukrepov, ki naj se začne na dan vloge, da bo mogoče kar največji del obdobja izvajanja ESPG izkoristiti v korist zadevnih delavcev;
Calls on the Commission to provide the Member States with a set of guidelines for the design and implementation of applications for EGF funding geared to a fast application procedure and a broad consensus among stakeholders on the strategy to be applied and the measures to be put in place for effective reintegration of the workers into the labour market; calls on the Member States to accelerate the procedure by prefinancing the measures that should start from the day of the application so as to use to the maximum the implementation period of the EGF for the benefit of the workers concerned;
opominja države članice, da je njihova obveznost sodelovati s socialnimi partnerji vse od začetka priprave vlog v skladu s členom 5 uredbe ESPG ter upoštevati člen 9 te uredbe, ki od držav članic zahteva, da zagotovijo informacije o financiranih dejavnostih in jih objavijo, te informacije pa naslovijo tudi na zadevne delavce, lokalne in regionalne organe ter socialne partnerje, in standardizirajo postopke; poziva države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bodo sveti delavcev vključeni še pred začetkom izvajanja posameznega programa, s čimer bodo zagotovile, da bodo socialni partnerji dejansko pomagali pri oblikovanju načrtov preusmeritve, ki bodo izpolnjevali potrebe delavcev, ne pa podjetij;
Reminds the Member States that they are obliged, on the one hand, to involve the social partners right from the outset in the task of preparing applications in accordance with Article 5 of the EGF Regulation and, on the other hand, to comply with Article 9 of the Regulation, which requests Member States to provide information on and publicise the funded actions, information that has also to be addressed to the workers concerned, the local and regional authorities and the social partners, and to standardise procedures; calls on the Member States to ensure that works councils are involved before any programme begins so as to guarantee that the social partners genuinely help to formulate conversion plans which meet the needs of employees and not of undertakings;
zahteva, da države članice ob posvetovanju z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti s socialnimi partnerji, vzpostavijo komunikacijsko in upravno strukturo za ESPG na nacionalni ravni in izmenjajo najboljše prakse na evropski ravni, kar bo ESPG omogočilo hitro in učinkovito ukrepanje v primerih množičnega odpuščanja;
Requests the Member States to put in place a communication and administration structure for the EGF at national level, in consultation with all stakeholders, particularly the social partners, and to exchange good practice at European level, which will allow the EGF to take rapid and effective action in cases of large-scale redundancies;
opozarja, da Uredba (ES) št. 1927/2006 omogoča več državam, da vložijo skupne vloge za pomoč iz ESPG v primeru, da prizadeti delavci v eni geografski regiji ali zadevnem sektorju niso koncentrirani v eni in isti državi članici;
Points out that Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 allows countries to submit joint requests for assistance from the EGF where the workers affected in a geographical area or a given sector are not concentrated in a single Member State;
meni, da je treba za pospešitev in poenostavitev postopkov zagotoviti učinkovitejše usklajevanje med Komisijo in Evropskim parlamentom, da se tako lahko zmanjša rok za odločanje, kar pa ne bi škodilo presoji vlog, ki jo izvajajo pristojni odbori Evropskega parlamenta, in zato:
Considers that, in order to speed up and simplify procedures, more effective coordination between the Commission and the European Parliament must be ensured, so that the time limit for decision-making could be reduced, without detriment to the evaluation of the applications made by the relevant committees of the EP, and therefore:
mora Komisija upoštevati časovni razpored Evropskega parlamenta, tako glede sej parlamentarnega odbora kot glede delnih zasedanj, in pravočasno predložiti svoje predloge, da se tako pospeši postopek odločanja;
the Commission must take due account of the EP calendar, with regard to the parliamentary committee meetings as well as the part-sessions, submitting its proposals in due time, in order to speed up the decision-making procedure;
mora Komisija pravočasno obvestiti Evropski parlament o težavah in/ali ovirah, na katere je naletela pri presoji vlog držav članic;
the Commission must inform the EP in due time on difficulties and/or blockages encountered while assessing the Member States' applications;
bosta na drugi strani Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbor za proračun naredila vse, kar je v njuni moči, da zagotovita sprejemanje sklepov na plenarnem zasedanju, ki bo sledilo sprejetju v odboru;
on the other hand, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Budgets will do everything they can to ensure that decisions are taken at the next plenary session following adoption in committee;
meni, da bi ti takojšnji ukrepi za poenostavitev in večjo prožnost postopka za uporabo sredstev ESPG lahko bili vpeljani v uredbo ob njeni reviziji, če bo to takrat upravičeno s pridobljenimi izkušnjami; meni, da noben od teh korakov ne sme na noben način omejiti ali zmanjšati pristojnosti Parlamenta, kot ene izmed vej proračunskega organa, pri odločanju o uporabi sredstev sklada;
Considers that these immediate steps to simplify and give added flexibility to the EGF mobilisation procedure could, if warranted in the light of the experience gained by then, be incorporated into the regulation when it is revised; takes the view that any of these steps should not in any way limit or decrease the power of Parliament as one arm of the budgetary authority while deciding on the mobilisation of the fund;
meni, da je treba poleg izboljšanja postopka vse do konca sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira podaljšati odstopanje, ki je bili vpeljano junija 2009, da se pomaga delavcem, ki izgubijo svojo zaposlitev zaradi gospodarske in finančne krize, kot tudi da se ohrani stopnja sofinanciranja na 65 %, če jasno obstajajo razlogi, ki so upravičili njihovo potrditev;
Takes the view that, over and above these improvements to the procedure, the period of validity of the derogation inserted in 2009 with a view to assisting workers who lose their jobs as a result of the economic and financial crisis should be extended until the end of the current MFF and that the cofinancing rate should, therefore, be maintained at 65%, given that the underlying causes on which their approval was based are far from having been removed;
ugotavlja, da so bila tokrat v predlog proračuna Komisije za leto 2011 prvič vključena sredstva za plačila iz ESPG, in meni, da je to pomemben element pri splošnem razmisleku o upravljanju in prepoznavnosti tega sklada; vseeno meni, da ta plačila morda ne bodo zadostovala za vse zneske, potrebne za izvajanje ESPG v letu 2011; zato ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da se vloge za sredstva iz ESPG ne smejo financirati le s prerazporeditvijo iz vrstic Evropskega socialnega sklada, in poziva Komisijo, naj v ta namen nemudoma opredeli različne proračunske vrstice in jih začne uporabljati;
Notes the inclusion, for the first time, in the Commission's Draft Budget 2011 of payment appropriations for the EGF and considers this an important element in the overall reflection on the management and visibility of this fund; considers, however, that these payment appropriations might not be sufficient to cover the amounts necessary for EGF applications in 2011; reiterates, therefore, its demand not to finance EGF applications exclusively through transfers from ESF lines and calls on the Commission to identify and use without further delay different budget lines for this purpose;
poudarja, da bo prihodnost ESPG določena v okviru pogajanj o naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru; meni, da je treba zato preučiti več možnosti; meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti preučitvi možnosti oblikovanja neodvisnega sklada z lastnimi sredstvi za obveznosti in plačila, in poziva Komisijo, da predstavi predloge za financiranje takšnega sklada; verjame, da bo vsaka prihodnja reforma ESPG ohranila njegovo prilagodljivost, ki trenutno predstavlja primerljivo prednost v odnosu do strukturnih skladov EU;
Stresses that the future of the EGF will be determined in the framework of negotiations on the next MFF; considers that for this purpose several options could be examined; considers that particular attention should be given to examining the option of establishing an independent fund with its own commitment and payment appropriations and calls on the Commission to come forward with proposals for resourcing such a fund; believes that any future reform of the EGF should maintain its flexibility, which currently represents a comparative advantage in relation to the EU Structural Funds;
poudarja, da bi preobrazba trenutnih ukrepov ESPG v stalni inštrument za podporo aktivnim ukrepom za iskanje zaposlitve pokazala politično voljo za izgradnjo evropskega socialnega stebra, ki bi dopolnjeval socialne politike držav članic in bi lahko obnovil evropski pristop na področju poklicnega usposabljanja; v tem okviru poudarja, da bi moral ESPG imeti različne cilje od ESS in evropskih programov za vseživljenjsko učenje, saj ESPG temelji na spodbujanju sposobnosti vsakega delavca, ki je prejel pomoč, in ne na nudenju odgovora na skrbi podjetij ali horizontalnih storitev ustanovam za usposabljanje;
Stresses that the conversion of the current EGF measures into a permanent means of support for active job-seeking measures would show a political will to develop a European social pillar that would be complementary to Member States' social policies and capable of revitalising the European approach to professional training; with this in mind, points out that the EGF should remain distinct in its objectives from the ESF and the European lifelong learning programmes, given that the EGF focuses on enhancing the abilities of each of the workers assisted, rather than on providing a response to the concerns of businesses or on the delivery of across-the-board services to training establishments;
poziva države članice, naj z uporabo ESPG ustvarijo sinergije med ESPG, Evropskim socialnim skladom in mikrofinanciranjem, da se ugotovi, kateri ukrep je v posameznem primeru najprimernejši;
Calls on Member States using the EGF to create synergies between the EGF, ESF and micro-finance so as to identify the measure best suited to the individual case;
spodbuja države članice, naj uporabijo ESPG za izvajanje evropskih ciljev, spodbujanje novega strokovnega znanja, za nova, trajna in okolju prijazna visokokakovostna delovna mesta v posamezni regiji ter za spodbujanje podjetništva in vseživljenjskega učenja, da se tako delavcem omogoči razvoj osebne kariere in prispeva k izboljšanju konkurenčnosti Evropske unije v okviru globalizacije;
Urges the Member States to use the EGF to implement European objectives, to promote new skills, for new, sustainable, green, high-quality jobs in a given region and to promote entrepreneurship and lifelong learning, so as to allow workers to develop their individual careers and to contribute to improving the competitiveness of the EU in the context of globalisation;
poziva Komisijo, da izboljša svoje poročanje o uporabi ESPG s tem, da znatno obogati svoja letna sporočila in redno posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu informacije o tem, na kakšen način države članice izvajajo finančne prispevke;
Calls on the Commission to improve its reporting on the use of the EGF by substantially fleshing out its annual reports and regularly forwarding to Parliament information on Member States' implementation of financial contributions;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. septembra 2010 o izvajanju in pregledu Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ( 2009/2140(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 7 September 2010 on the implementation and review of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters ( 2009/2140(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu: „Uredba Bruselj I“ ali „Uredba“),
(hereinafter ‘the Brussels I Regulation’ or ‘the Regulation’),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Uredbe ( KOM(2009)0174 ),
having regard to the Commission's report on the application of that regulation ( COM(2009)0174 ),
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 21. aprila 2009 o pregledu izvajanja Uredbe Bruselj I ( KOM(2009)0175 ),
having regard to the Commission's Green Paper of 21 April 2009 on the review of the Brussels I Regulation ( COM(2009)0175 ),
ob upoštevanju heidelberškega poročila (JLS/2004/C4/03) o uporabi Uredbe Bruselj I v državah članicah in odzivih na zeleno knjigo Komisije,
having regard to the Heidelberg Report (JLS/2004/C4/03) on the application of the Brussels I Regulation in the Member States and the responses to the Commission's Green Paper,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu – območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane – Stockholmski program Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0090 .
having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council – An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen – Stockholm programme Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0090 .
, natančneje poglavij Večji dostop do civilnega pravosodja za državljane in podjetja in Oblikovanje evropske pravosodne kulture,
, specifically the sections ‘Greater access to civil justice for citizens and business’ and ‘Building a European judicial culture’,
ob upoštevanju pristopa Unije k Haaški konferenci o zasebnem mednarodnem pravu z dne 3. aprila 2007,
having regard to the Union's accession to the Hague Conference on private in║ternational law on 3 April 2007,
ob upoštevanju podpisa Haaške konvencije v imenu Evropske unije z dne 30. junija 2005 o izbiri sodišča z dne 1. aprila 2009,
having regard to the signature, on behalf of the Union, of the Hague Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements on 1 April 2009,
, luganskega mnenja Mnenje 1/03, ZOdl.
, its Opinion 1/03 (the
ZOdl 2009, I-663.
[2009] ECR I-663.
ob upoštevanju Bruseljske konvencije z dne 27. septembra 1968 o sodni pristojnosti in izvršbi sodb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah Prečiščeno besedilo iz UL C 27, 26.1.1998, str.
having regard to the Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters Consolidated version in OJ, C 27, 26.1.1998, p.
, Uredbe (ES) št. 805/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o uvedbi evropskega naloga za izvršbo nespornih zahtevkov UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
, Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 creating a European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p.
, Uredbe (ES) št. 1896/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o uvedbi postopka za evropski plačilni nalog UL L 399, 30.12.2006, str.
, Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 creating a European order for payment procedure OJ L 399, 30.12.2006, p.
, Uredbe (ES) št. 861/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o uvedbi evropskega postopka v sporih majhne vrednosti UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
, Regulation (EC) No 861/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 establishing a European Small Claims Procedure OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
, Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 4/2009 z dne 18. decembra 2008 o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb ter sodelovanju v preživninskih zadevah UL L 7, 10.1.2009, str.
, Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations OJ L 7, 10.1.2009, p.
in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1347/2000 UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
and Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 864/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti (Rim II) UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 16. decembra 2009,
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 16 December 2009,
ob upoštevanju člena 48 in 119(2) Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 48 and 119(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0219/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0219/2010 ),