natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da morajo evropske institucije pri oblikovanju predlogov spoštovati načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter upoštevati merila iz Protokola o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki je priložen Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije;
Emphasises that European institutions must respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality when formulating proposals and observe the criteria laid down in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality annexed to the TFEU;
poudarja, da morajo vsi osnutki zakonodajnih predpisov vključevati razloge, iz katerih je možno sklepati, da bi bili za dosego cilja boljši ukrepi EU, in biti utemeljeni s kakovostnimi in po možnosti s količinskimi kazalniki v skladu z omenjenim protokolom;
Stresses that all draft legislation must include reasons for concluding that the objective can be better achieved by EU action, substantiated by qualitative and, wherever possible, quantitative indicators, in accordance with the above-mentioned protocol;
odločno podpira proces izboljšanja predpisov, ki stremi k večji preglednosti, učinkovitosti in skladnosti zakonodaje Evropske unije; poudarja ključno vlogo Komisije kot organa, ki ima pristojnost zakonodajne pobude, pri pripravi visokokakovostnih zakonodajnih predlogov; se obvezuje, da bo storil vse, da bodo ti predlogi pregledani v skladu z ustreznim zakonodajnim postopkom; poudarja tudi pomen sodelovanja z državami članicami pri zagotavljanju pravilne uporabe zakonodaje;
Firmly supports the process of better regulation aimed at increasing the transparency, effectiveness and coherence of European Union legislation; emphasises the Commission's key role, as the institution with the power of legislative initiative, in drafting high-quality legislative proposals; undertakes to make every effort to examine such proposals promptly, in accordance with the appropriate legislative procedure; emphasises, furthermore, the importance of cooperating with Member States to ensure that legislation is correctly implemented;
opaža prizadevanje Komisije pri zgoraj omenjenem procesu, ki se izraža v vrsti dokumentov, zlasti v tretjem strateškem pregledu boljše priprave zakonodaje v Evropski uniji, in dejavnostih, ki potekajo v zvezi s tem; hkrati ugotavlja, da veliko uporabnikov ne pozna tega programa, zato poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za njegovo večjo prepoznavnost;
Notes the Commission's commitment to this process, as reflected in a series of documents, in particular the Third Strategic Review of Better Regulation in the European Union, as well as in its ongoing activities; notes, at the same time, that the programme remains unknown to a wider audience and calls on the Commission to promote it more effectively;
se strinja z ubeseditvijo v točkah št. 3 in 15 iz sklepov Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2009, ki se nanašajo na skupno odgovornost za izboljšanje zakonodajnega okolja in razširitev te odgovornosti na vse institucije in osebe, udeležene v procesu;
Agrees with the observations set out in paragraphs 3 and 15 of the Council conclusions of 4 December 2009 concerning joint responsibility for better regulation and giving all the bodies and individuals involved in the process greater responsibility;
je seznanjen z udeležbo Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij v razpravi o izboljšanju zakonodajnega okolja in zmanjšanju upravnih bremen ter pričakuje plodno sodelovanje na tem področju;
Notes the participation of the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in discussions on better regulation and the reduction of administrative burdens, and hopes to see fruitful cooperation in this area;
ugotavlja, da je pri izboljšanju medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja na tem obsežnem področju potreben pregled sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje iz leta 2003; opozarja na točke iz resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o okvirnem sporazumu o odnosih med Parlamentom in Komisijo, ki so pomembne za to vprašanje, zlasti opozarja na skupno zavezo obeh institucij, da se bosta dogovorili o glavnih spremembah pri pripravah na prihodnja pogajanja s Svetom ministrov o prilagoditvi medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje novim določbam Lizbonske pogodbe;
Considers that the improvement of interinstitutional cooperation in this vast area requires a revision of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making of 2003; draws attention, in this regard, to the relevant paragraphs of its resolution of 9 February 2010 on the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, especially to the joint commitment of the two institutions to agree on key changes in preparation for future negotiations with the Council of Ministers on an adaptation of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making to the new provisions of the Lisbon Treaty;
vztraja, da mora Komisija v skladu s političnim dogovorom na podlagi resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo storiti vse, da bosta Parlament in Svet enakovredno obravnavana v zakonodajnemu procesu in bo tako izvajano temeljno načelo enake obravnave Parlamenta in Sveta, kot ga določa Lizbonska pogodba, še posebno z istočasnim in obsežnim obveščanjem obeh institucij o vseh dogodkih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajni postopek, in o njegovem napredku ter z zagotovitvijo enakovrednega dostopa obeh do sej in posredovanja prispevkov ali drugih informacij;
Urges the Commission, on the basis of the political agreement embodied in the resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission, to make every effort to ensure that Parliament and the Council are treated as equals in the lawmaking process, thus implementing the principle of equal treatment between Parliament and the Council deriving from the Lisbon Treaty, in particular by simultaneously and comprehensively notifying both institutions of all events and developments affecting that process and ensuring equal access to meetings and to proposals or other information;
poudarja, da proces poenostavitve zakonodaje ne sme povzročiti znižanja standardov iz veljavnega pravnega reda, zaradi česar morajo biti posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, tudi s socialnimi partnerji, bistven sestavni del tega procesa;
Stresses that the process of simplifying legislation must not lead to a lowering of the standards laid down in current legislation, which is why consultations with all interested parties, including social partners, must be an integral part of the process;
z zadovoljstvom sprejema tesnejše vključevanje nacionalnih parlamentov v proces oblikovanja evropske zakonodaje, zlasti v proces nadzora nad skladnostjo zakonodajnih predlogov z načelom subsidiarnosti; poudarja, da morajo nacionalni parlamenti upoštevati osemtedenski rok za predložitev mnenj;
Welcomes the closer involvement of national parliaments in the European legislative process, in particular in the process of verifying the compliance of legislative proposals with the principle of subsidiarity; underlines the need for national parliaments to observe the eight-week period in which to make their opinions known;
z zadovoljstvom sprejema dejavnosti Komisije za učinkovite izmenjavo informacij med nacionalnimi parlamenti ter obveščanje Parlamenta in Sveta o njej; spodbuja nacionalne parlamente, naj jasno razmejijo mnenja, ki zadevajo načelo subsidiarnosti, in tista, ki so povezana s predlogi Komisije;
Welcomes the action taken by the Commission to ensure an effective exchange of information with national parliaments and to inform Parliament and the Council thereof; encourages national parliaments to distinguish clearly between opinions concerning the principle of subsidiarity and opinions on the substance of Commission proposals;
poudarja temeljno odgovornost Komisije za izvedene ocene učinka; poziva k razvoju mehanizmov za zagotovitev neodvisnosti in verodostojnosti izvedenih analiz; hkrati se zavezuje, da bo še naprej izvajal ocene učinka bistvenih sprememb, ki jih je podal na predloge Komisije;
Underlines the Commission's basic responsibility to carry out impact assessments; calls for the development of mechanisms to guarantee the independence and credibility of the analyses carried out; at the same time undertakes to continue to assess the impact of any significant amendments it makes to Commission proposals;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj ob predložitvi zakonodajnega predloga Parlamentu in Svetu poleg celotne ocene učinka sistematično predloži tudi svoj dve do štiri strani dolg povzetek;
To this end, invites the Commission to provide systematically a two-to-four-page summary of its impact assessment to Parliament and the Council, together with the full impact assessment, when submitting the legislative proposal;
spodbuja vse parlamentarne odbore, naj pred vsako razpravo o zakonodajnem predlogu Komisije s Komisijo opravijo izmenjavo mnenj o oceni učinka;
Encourages all Parliament committees to precede any discussion of a Commission legislative proposal with an exchange of views with the Commission on the impact assessment;
na podlagi dosedanjih izkušenj priznava potrebo po reviziji skupnega medinstitucionalnega pristopa k ocenam učinka in spodbuja vse institucije, naj izpolnijo svoje zaveze glede ocen učinka; opozarja na zaključke delovnega dokumenta konference predsednikov odborov v zvezi s tem vprašanjem; spodbuja pobude parlamentarnih odborov za poziv Komisiji, naj predloži vse ocene učinkov, da bi jih lahko pristojni odbori v celoti pregledali že na začetku in pred prvo izmenjavo mnenj;
Recognises the need, in the light of experience to date, for a revision of the Interinstitutional Common Approach to Impact Assessment and encourages all the institutions to fulfil their commitments regarding impact assessments; draws attention to the conclusions of the Conference of Committee Chairs' working document in this connection; encourages the initiatives taken by Parliament committees in inviting the Commission to present all impact assessments so that they can be scrutinised fully by the relevant committees at the outset and before the first exchange of views;
istočasno opozarja Komisijo, da je treba vse nove predloge oceniti ob celovitem upoštevanju vseh učinkov, pri čemer je treba uporabljati celovit pristop, pri katerem je treba izvesti hkratno analizo gospodarskih, družbenih in okoljskih učinkov;
Reminds the Commission, at the same time, that all new proposals should be evaluated with regard to the full extent of their impact, in accordance with the principle of an integrated approach, which means that their economic, social and environmental consequences all need to be analysed;
zlasti poudarja potrebo po ustrezni analizi družbenih učinkov zakonodajnih predlogov, med drugim njihovih posledic za evropski trg dela in življenjski standard; spet poudarja, da je treba natančno preučiti učinek zakonodaje na podjetja;
Stresses, in particular, the need to examine the social effects of legislative proposals, including their impact on the European labour market and living standards; underlines once again the necessity to examine carefully the impact of legislation on businesses;
priporoča, da Komisija izvede ocene učinka za vse predloge, ki zmanjšujejo upravna bremena, kar bi omogočilo analizo možnih stranskih učinkov teh predlogov;
Suggests that the Commission should carry out an impact assessment on all proposals to reduce administrative burdens, thereby allowing any side effects of such proposals to be examined;
poudarja, da se mora Komisija za objektivno oceno učinka sistematično posvetovati z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, tudi z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji; ugotavlja, da je treba zainteresirane strani bolje informirati o njihovi možnosti sodelovanja v posvetovanjih, in poziva k podaljšanju 8-tedenskega obdobja za posvetovanje; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi in objavi pregleden seznam ocen učinka, načrtovanih za naslednje leto, s čimer bo zainteresiranim stranem omogočila, da se ustrezno pripravijo;
Points out that, for an impact assessment to be objective, the Commission must systematically consult all interested parties, including small and medium-sized enterprises; recognises the need to ensure that interested parties are better informed of the possibility of taking part in consultations and calls for the extension of the eight-week consultation period; calls on the Commission to draw up and publish a clear list of the impact assessments planned for the year ahead, in order to allow interested parties to prepare for them;
meni, da so nepristranske ocene učinka izjemno pomembno orodje za ocenjevanje predlogov Komisije, in se zato zavzema, da bi izvajanje ocene učinka preverjal zunanji, neodvisni organ, ki pa bi moral biti odgovoren Parlamentu;
Believes that objective impact assessments are an extremely important tool for assessing Commission proposals and calls, therefore, for scrutiny of the conduct of impact assessments by an independent body, which should, however, be accountable to Parliament;
poudarja, da je treba kakovost ocen učinka stalno spremljati; pozdravlja mnenje sveta o ocenah učinka o splošnem izboljšanju njihove kakovosti; ugotavlja, da svet uporablja strožja merila vrednotenja; hkrati ugotavlja, da je visok delež ocen učinka (več kot 30 %), ki jih je svet sprva zavrnil, dokaz, da morajo ustrezne službe Komisije še naprej izboljševati njihovo kakovost; nadalje zahteva povečanje obsega osebja Sveta;
Emphasises that the quality of impact assessments should be subject to continuous monitoring; welcomes the opinion of the Impact Assessment Board on the general improvement in their quality; notes that the Board is applying stricter assessment criteria; notes, at the same time, that the high percentage of impact assessments (over 30%) that are initially rejected by the Board testifies to the need for the relevant Commission departments to improve their quality further; calls for an increase in the staff available to the Board;
pozdravlja nove smernice Komisije za ocene učinka, zlasti vključitev vprašanj, ki zadevajo načelo subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti; pričakuje, da bodo nove smernice bistveno prispevale k optimizaciji izvajanja ocen učinka in s tem k izboljšanju zakonodajnih predlogov;
Welcomes the Commission's new guidelines on carrying out impact assessments and, in particular, the inclusion therein of a set of questions concerning the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; hopes that the new guidelines will lead to a significant improvement in the carrying-out of impact assessments and a subsequent improvement in the quality of legislative proposals;
zlasti pozdravlja dejstvo, da se v smernicah Evropske komisije o izvajanju ocen učinka poziva k analizam učinka prihodnje zakonodaje in upravne pobude o malih in srednjih podjetjih (test MSP) ter k temu, da se rezultati te analize upoštevajo pri pripravi osnutkov predlogov; poudarja, da je sistematična uporaba testa MSP v oceni učinka Komisije pomemben element pri izvajanju akta za mala podjetja, saj znatno prispeva k zakonodajnemu okolju, ki je prijazno do malih in srednjih podjetij; poziva države članice, naj test MSP uporabijo na nacionalni ravni;
Welcomes, in particular, the fact that the Commission's new Impact Assessment Guidelines call for analysis of the impact of forthcoming legislation and administrative initiatives on SMEs (the SME test) and for the results of such analysis to be taken into account when proposals are drafted; emphasises that systematic application of the SME test in the Commission's impact assessments is an important element in implementation of the Small Business Act, contributing significantly to an SME-friendly regulatory environment; calls on the Member States to apply the SME test at national level;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni načrt za „pametne predpise“, ki je pojasnjen v političnih smernicah predsednika Komisije Barrosa, zlasti v zvezi z večjimi prizadevanji na področju naknadnega vrednotenja, in naj v načrt vključi tudi količinske kazalnike, zlasti tiste, ki se nanašajo na zmanjševanje upravnih bremen;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the ‘smart regulation’ agenda outlined in President Barroso's political guidelines, in particular with reference to stepping up efforts regarding ex-post assessments, and also to include on that agenda quantitative indicators, particularly those connected with the intention to reduce bureaucratic burdens;
poziva Komisijo, naj sistematično izvaja naknadno vrednotenje sprejete zakonodaje, da bo lahko, v skladu z možnostmi, med drugim preverila točnost ustreznih ocen učinka;
Calls on the Commission systematically to carry out ex-post assessments of adopted legislation in order, among other things, to verify insofar as possible the accuracy of the relevant impact assessments;
je seznanjen s pobudo Računskega sodišča za preiskavo sistema ocen učinka in z zanimanjem pričakuje rezultate;
Notes the evaluation of the impact assessment system undertaken by the Court of Auditors and awaits its results with interest;
poudarja pomen zmanjšanja stroškov podjetij, ki poslujejo v Evropski uniji, da bi lahko uspešno delovala v težkih gospodarskih pogojih in bila konkurenčna na svetovni ravni; poudarja, da je treba poenostaviti javne upravne postopke; poudarja, da se je treba pri zmanjševanju upravnega bremena osredotočiti na nepotrebne zahteve po podatkih, in popolnoma podpira načelo enkratnega opravljanja vseh formalnosti iz akta za mala podjetja; poudarja, da zmanjšanje upravnih bremen za podjetja ne sme imeti negativnih družbenih ali okoljskih posledic;
Emphasises the importance of reducing the costs for businesses operating in the European Union, in order to enable them to function effectively in difficult economic conditions and compete globally; underlines the need to streamline public administrative procedures; stresses that administrative burden reduction must focus on unnecessary information requirements and, as such, fully supports the ‘only once’ principle set out in the Small Business Act; emphasises that reducing administrative burdens for businesses must not have any negative social or environmental consequences;
pozdravlja rezultate dosedanjega dela Komisije v obliki priprave predlogov, ki po njihovem sprejetju omogočajo zmanjšanje upravnih bremen za celo 33 % do leta 2012, kar presega predhodno zavezo k zmanjšanju za 25 %; ugotavlja, da bi tako lahko dosegli prihranke, večje od 40 milijard EUR Glej 6. stran Akcijskega programa za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v EU – Načrti za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev za posamezna področja in ukrepi za leto 2009 ( KOM(2009)0544 ).
Welcomes the results of the Commission's work to date in drafting proposals which, once adopted, will enable administrative burdens to be reduced by as much as 33% by 2012, an improvement on the earlier commitment to a 25% reduction; notes that savings generated in this way could amount to more than EUR 40 billion See page 6 of the Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU – Sectoral Reduction Plans and 2009 Actions ( COM(2009)0544 ).
posebej opozarja na napredek pri predlogih Komisije, ki obetajo največ prihranka (na primer izključitev mikropodjetij iz zahtev Unije za pripravo računovodskih izkazov in sprememba direktive o davku na dodano vrednost, ki naj bi olajšala elektronsko izstavljanje računov); poziva države članice h konstruktivnem sodelovanju v Svetu in učinkovitemu prenosu sprejetih aktov v nacionalni pravni red;
Draws particular attention to the progress made in the work on those Commission proposals that offer the greatest potential for savings (i.e. the exemption of micro-enterprises from Union accounting requirements and the amendment of the VAT Directive to facilitate electronic invoicing); calls on Member States to work together constructively in the Council and to ensure the effective transposition into national law of adopted legislation;
ugotavlja, da se je referenčni program za izračun upravnih bremen izkazal za koristno, vendar drago metodo; spodbuja Komisijo, naj upošteva nadomestne metode za izračun upravnih bremen, kot so na primer posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi, kar v konkretnih primerih omogoča hitro odpravo bremen;
Notes that the baseline programme for the measurement of administrative burdens has proved to be a useful but costly method; encourages the Commission to consider alternative methods of measuring administrative burdens, such as consultation with interested parties, which would allow the prompt removal of burdens in specific cases;
poudarja, da za model standardnih stroškov za izračun upravnih bremen ni bila opravljena neodvisna ocena;
Emphasises that the Standard Cost Model for the measurement of administrative burdens has not been independently evaluated;
hkrati opaža sorazmerno majhen delež predlogov (148 leta 2008), ki so bili predloženi prek posebne internetne strani; ugotavlja, da mora Komisija javnost seznaniti z možnostjo, da zadevni subjekti opozorijo na prekomerne stroške, ki izhajajo iz evropske ali nacionalne zakonodaje;
Notes, at the same time, the relatively small number (148 in 2008) of suggestions posted online on the dedicated website; considers that the Commission should publicise the fact that those affected may draw attention to excessive administrative costs resulting from European or national law;
se strinja s Komisijo, da so elektronska sredstva komunikacije odličen instrument za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen, in jo spodbuja, naj uresniči smernice sporočila „e-Komisija 2006–2010“ in „Strategije i2010“, ki stremijo k posodobitvi evropske uprave;
Shares the Commission's opinion that electronic communication constitutes an excellent tool for reducing administrative burdens and encourages it to realise the ideas set out in the e-Commission 2006-2010 framework and the i2010 strategy aimed at modernising administration in Europe;
spodbuja Komisijo k nadaljnjem uresničevanju smernic iz načrtov za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen za posamezna področja; se zavezuje k učinkovitemu preverjanju ustreznih zakonodajnih predlogov;
Urges the Commission to continue to implement sectoral plan measures to reduce administrative burdens; undertakes to give prompt consideration to legislative proposals relating thereto;
ugotavlja, da je skupina predstavnikov neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani na visoki ravni, pristojna za vprašanje upravne obremenitve, pozitivno prispevala k programu Komisije za zmanjšanje teh bremen; vendar poudarja, da bi morala biti sestava skupine bolj uravnotežena in vključevati več strokovnjakov, ki bi predstavljali civilno družbo, in strokovnjakov iz drugih držav članic; poziva, da se mandat tako razširjene skupine podaljša do leta 2013;
Notes the positive contribution made by the High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens to the programme to reduce those burdens that is being carried out by the Commission; emphasises, however, that the composition of the group should be better balanced, with the inclusion of more experts representing civil society and experts from other Member States; calls for the terms of reference of the group, thus expanded, to be extended to 2013;
opozarja, da državljani niso sposobni razlikovati med upravnimi bremeni, ki izhajajo iz evropske zakonodaje, in tistimi, ki jih nalaga nacionalna zakonodaja, ter da nacionalna upravna bremena prispevajo k negativni podobi Evropske unije;
Points out that citizens are not able to distinguish between administrative burdens resulting from European law and those imposed by national law and that national administrative burdens play a part in creating a negative image of the European Union;
opozarja, da je za uspešno uresničevanje programa za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen potrebno dejavno sodelovanje Komisije z državami članicami, da se preprečijo različne razlage in pretirana natančnost („goldplating“) pri izvajanju zakonodaje;
Points out that, to ensure that the programme to reduce burdens is successful, active cooperation between the Commission and the Member States is necessary in order to avoid discrepancies in interpretation and the ‘gold-plating’ of legislation;