natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju resolucije 60/1 generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 24. oktobra 2005 o izidu svetovnega vrha, zlasti odstavkov 138–140 o odgovornosti za zaščito,
having regard to UN General Assembly Resolution 60/1 of 24 October 2005 on the 2005 World Summit Outcome, and in particular paragraphs 138-140 thereof on the responsibility to protect,
ker so Svetovna banka in skupnost za mednarodni razvoj v devetdesetih letih tiste države, ki ne zmorejo izpolnjevati svojih „tradicionalnih” nalog in pospeševati napredka ter imajo šibke institucije, poimenovali „ranljive države”,
whereas, since the 1990s, states that lack capacity to fulfil their ‘traditional’ functions and to drive development forward and have weak institutions have been named ‘fragile states’ by the World Bank (WB) and the international development community,
ker je ranljivost države bolj empirični kot normativni koncept in odvisna spremenljivka, ne pa izvorno stanje; ker primeri ranljivosti obstajajo tako pred kriznimi razmerami kot po njih; ker morajo državljani nositi odgovornost, da določijo, kdaj države niso več „ranljive”,
whereas state fragility is more an empirical concept than a normative one and it is a dependent variable and not an original condition; whereas a situation of fragility exists either before a crisis or after one; whereas the responsibility for determining when states are no longer ‘fragile’ should be that of their citizens,
ker je ne glede na to, da ni nedvoumne delovne opredelitve tega koncepta, možno prepoznati države, ki se soočajo s primeri ranljivosti, in ker se je število držav, ki jih je Svetovna banka ocenila za ranljive skoraj podvojilo – od leta 2000 do 2006 je naraslo s 14 na 26, 14 od teh držav pa je v podsaharski Afriki;
whereas, despite the fact that there is no unambiguous working definition of the concept, it is possible to identify states undergoing situations of fragility and the number of states judged by the WB to be ‘fragile’ almost doubled from 14 to 26 between 2000 and 2006, of which 14 are in Sub-Saharan Africa,
ker je bistveno razumeti zunanje in notranje dejavnike ranljivosti, da se takim državam lahko zagotovi pomoč in okrepitev, od česar imajo neposredno korist njihovi državljani ter lahko pripomore k doseganju miru na regionalni in svetovni ravni k blaginji;
whereas it is essential to understand the external and internal factors of fragility in order to provide assistance and empowerment to such states, for the direct benefit of their citizens and for the sake of regional and global peace and prosperity,
ker različne oblike ranljivosti (na primer: izpostavljenost konfliktom, tako imenovano „prekletstvo virov”, slabo upravljanje, celinskost) zahtevajo različne vrste ukrepov; ker določeno državo lahko prizadenejo različne oblike ranljivosti, zaradi česar je težko opredeliti vrsto ranljivosti in usmerjeno ukrepati;
whereas different kinds of fragility (for instance being conflict-prone, the so-called ‘resource curse’, bad governance, being landlocked) call for different kinds of intervention; whereas a given country might come under different types of fragility, thus rendering categorising and specific action difficult,
ker je spoprijemanje s primeri ranljivosti dolgotrajen proces in zahteva trajnostno in dolgoročno zavzemanje prizadetih držav in mednarodne skupnosti;
whereas addressing fragility situations is a long-term process and requires a sustained and long-term commitment both from the countries affected and from the international community,
ker Afriška unija priznava, da je obnova predvsem politično vprašanje, ne pa tehnično; zato poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti legitimno državno oblast, za doseganje upravljanja, ki temelji na soglasju, spodbujevalne ukrepe za ranljive skupine in vzpostavi lokalne zmogljivosti v okviru pravične razporeditve moči in medsebojne odgovornosti Politika Afriške unije glede obnove in razvoja po končanih sporih, ki jo je 52 držav članic sprejelo na vrhu Afriške unije v Banjulu julija 2006. ,
whereas the African Union recognises that reconstruction is primarily a political rather than a technical matter; stressing, therefore, the need to build legitimate state authority, for consensus-based governance, for affirmative action for vulnerable groups and for local capacity building within the framework of an equitable distribution of power and mutual accountability ‘African Union Policy on Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development’, adopted by 52 Member States in the Banjul Summit of the AU in July 2006. ,
ker primeri ranljivosti navadno izhajajo iz revščine in slabih življenjskih razmer, v najhujših primerih pa povzročijo zlom države ali trajno negotovost; ker pomanjkanje varovanja in pravic državljanov prizadetih držav članic zahteva ukrepanje EU in mednarodne skupnosti in mora biti v središču tega ukrepanja,
whereas situations of fragility are often rooted in poverty and bad living conditions, leading in most extreme cases to state collapse and permanent insecurity; whereas the lack of protection and rights for the citizens of the countries affected requires - and must be at the centre of - action from the EU and the international community,
ker med državami in donatorji še vedno ni zadostne izmenjave izkušenj v zvezi z izgradnjo države, kar onemogoča proces učenja iz izkušenj;
whereas there is still not enough sharing of state-building experiences between countries and between donors, thus preventing lessons from being learned,
ker ni potrebe po dvojnih mehanizmih odgovornosti: med donatorji in državami prejemnicami ter med njimi in ljudmi;
whereas there is a need for a double mechanism of accountability: between the donors and the recipient countries and between the latter and their people,
ker zaradi številnih instrumentov financiranja obstaja nevarnost, da pride do podvojevanja, ali se zgodi, da se sredstva ne dodelijo ter je zato odgovornost in udeležba že oslabljenih družb težja;
whereas multiple funding instruments run the risk of duplication or of a lack of resource allocation and make accountability and participation more difficult for societies that era already weakened,
meni, da je ranljivost zahteven razvojni izziv in poudarja potrebo po dobro opredeljenem in skladnem načrtu, ki bo temeljil na načelu „neškodovanja”, tj. bo prilagojen razmeram in bo upošteval dolgoročne premisleke, in na usklajevanju številnih ciljev različnih zainteresiranih strani ob upoštevanju glavnega in splošnega cilja zmanjšanja revščine in doseganja razvojnih ciljev novega tisočletja;
Considers that fragility is a complex development challenge and stresses the need for a well defined and coherent fragility agenda, based on the principle of ‘doing no harm’, i.e. adapted to the situation, taking long-term considerations into account and coordinating the multiple aims and approaches of the different stakeholders in the light of the main and overarching objective of reducing poverty and achieving the MDGs;
pozdravlja pripravo odziva EU na ranljivost in poudarja, da je treba Parlament vključiti v vse faze te strategije;
Welcomes the preparation of an EU response to fragility and stresses the need to involve parliaments in all phases of this strategy;
meni, da je stabilen demokratičen sistem, ki vodi k razvoju, pravni državi, zaščiti človekovih pravic, dobremu upravljanju in miroljubnemu preprečevanju konfliktov, najboljši način za premagovanje ranljivosti ter doseganje vzpostavitev odprtih institucij in učinkovitega in pravičnega oblikovanja politik;
Affirms that a stable democratic political system, conducive to development, the rule of law, the protection of human rights, good governance and peaceful conflict prevention is the best way out of fragility and towards functioning open institutions and efficient and equitable policy-making;
poudarja, da mora biti načrtovanje in ukrepanje v primerih ranljivosti celovito in skladno ter biti namenjeno predvsem ljudem prizadetih držav in njihovemu trajnostnemu razvoju; meni, da morajo obstoječi instrumenti in mehanizmi, ki upošteva ranljivost in se popolnoma strinja, da je treba okrepiti potencial strateških dokumentov držav in tematskih programov, pripravljenih v partnerstvu, da se prepreči ranljivost;
Points out that programming and action in situations of fragility need to be comprehensive and coherent and have the people and the sustainable development of the countries affected at its core, considers that existing instruments and mechanisms must mainstream a fragility-sensitive approach and fully agrees that the potential of Country Strategy Papers and thematic programmes, prepared in partnership, to prevent fragility needs to be enhanced;
poudarja, da mora biti glavni sestavni del načrta za odpravljanje ranljivosti trojni, s posebno pozornostjo, namenjeno revnim ljudem in preventivnim ukrepom: spodbujati mora človekovo varnost, izboljšati razvoj in zagotoviti mir; poudarja, da jih je treba izvajati skladno;
Stresses that the main components of the fragility agenda should be three-fold, with a pro-poor and prevention emphasis: promoting human security, improving development and ensuring peace; also stresses the need to implement them with consistency in the field;
meni, da mora biti dolgoročno strateško načrtovanje usklajeno z izvajanjem programov, ker morajo ostati prožni in prilagodljivi, ter se mora biti zmožno odzivati na potrebe države; zato poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja dolgoročni razvoj, vendar tudi kratkoročno zagotovi osnovne storitve, na primer na področju zdravja in izobraževanja;
Considers that long-term strategic planning needs to be coordinated with the implementation of programmes on the ground that have to remain flexible and adaptable, and needs to be able to be responsive to the country context; calls on the Commission, therefore, to promote long-term development, but also to provide basic services such as health and education in the short term;
poudarja, da morajo biti razvojni programi za primere ranljivosti skladni z osnovnimi načeli, ki veljajo za vsakršno načrtovanje, to je lastništvo, partnerstvo, medsebojna odgovornost in trajnostnost;
Stresses that development programmes in fragility situations should conform to the same underlying principles as for development programming anywhere, that is, ownership, partnership, mutual accountability and sustainability;
poziva Komisijo, naj podpira mirovni in politični dialog z vsemi stranmi in proces sprave ter okrepi sodelovanje skupnosti in civilne družbe pri vseh vidikih obnovitvenega cikla in razvojne strategije;
Calls on the Commission to support all-inclusive peace and political dialogue and reconciliation processes and to enhance the participation of communities and civil society in all aspects of the recovery cycle and the development strategies;
poudarja, da je trajnostni razvoj mogoče doseči le, če je pravica dosežena, zlasti v zvezi z vojnimi zločini in zločini proti človeštvu; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj podpira krepitev pravnega in sodnega sistema v ranljivih državah, da se zagotovi, da so storilci hudih zločinov proti človeštvu sodno preganjani, pa tudi, da se omogoči vzporedno napredovanje pobud za doseganje pravice in sprave;
Stresses that sustainable peace can only be achieved if justice is done, and seen to be done, in particular with regard to war crimes and crimes against humanity; in this context, calls on the Commission to support the strengthening of the legal and judicial systems of fragile states, in order to ensure that perpetrators of serious crimes against humanity are brought to justice, but also to allow for the parallel advancement of justice and reconciliation initiatives;
poziva k okrepitvi zakonskih pravic posameznika, vključno s pravico najrevnejših do zemljiških posestev; in poziva Komisijo, naj podpira prizadevanja držav v razvoju za diverzifikacijo svoje kmetijske proizvodnje in jim tako omogoči, da se rešijo iz zelo ranljivih razmer, ki so posledica gospodarstva, temelječega samo na enem pridelku, ter se tako izognejo ranljivim razmeram, ki vodijo v propad gospodarstva;
Calls for the strengthening of individual legal rights, including on land holdings of the poorest; and calls on the Commission to support efforts made in developing countries to diversify their agricultural production so as to allow them to get out of a situation of highly vulnerable single-crop economies and thus avoid fragile situations resulting from economic collapse;
ponovno poudarja, da morajo razvoj in ukrepi v EU dati večji poudarek preventivnim ukrepom, zgodnjemu obveščanju in analizi tveganj, da bi se izognili nesrečam, ki ji povzroči človek, in naravnim nesrečam, do katerih prihaja v ranljivih razmerah;
Reiterates the need for EU development and humanitarian action to put a stronger emphasis on preventive measures, early warning and risk analyses to avoid both man-made and natural disasters that result in fragile situations;
meni, da mora celovit model na področju ranljivosti in razvoja upoštevati obstoječe lokalne, regionalne in celinske pobude, kot je nedavna politika Afriške unije glede obnove in razvoja po končanih sporih, Novo partnerstvo za razvoj Afrike, afriški mehanizem za medsebojno pregledovanje ter listina o demokraciji, volitvah in upravljanju v Afriki; zato poziva Komisjo, naj podpira prizadevanja, da se na tem področju okrepi sodelovanje med državami na jugu;
Affirms that a comprehensive model on fragility and development needs to take into account existing local, regional and continental initiatives such as the recent ‘African Union Policy on Post-Conflict Reconstruction and Development’, NEPAD, the African Peer Review Mechanism and the Charter on Democracy, Elections and Governance in Africa; calls on the Commission, therefore, to support efforts to strengthen South-South cooperation in this field;
Komisijo poziva tudi, naj zagotovi, da domače zainteresirane strani polno sodelujejo v prizadevanjih za premagovanje primerov ranljivosti, pa tudi, da sta upoštevana njihovo lastno razumevanje in opredelitev izgradnje države ter model države ter da se uporabi lokalno strokovno osebje;
Calls also on the Commission to ensure not only that domestic stakeholders are fully involved in the efforts to overcome fragility situations, but also that their own notion and definition of state-building and their state model is considered and that local expertise is used;
poudarja bistveno vlogo žensk in izpostavljenih skupin pri spodbujanju razvoja in varnosti ter poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja, da pridobijo moč odločanja z upoštevanjem njihovih posebnih potreb in razmer v primerih ranljivosti;
Stresses the crucial role which women and vulnerable groups play in promoting development and peace, and asks the Commission to promote their empowerment, namely by taking into account their specific needs and situation in fragility environments;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bosta v sklopu okvira skupne strategije EU–Afrika EU in Afrika vzpostavili dialog o konceptu „primerov ranljivosti“, katerega cilj bo doseči skupno razumevanje in soglasje glede nadaljnjih ukrepov, in da je ta dialog že predviden v akcijskem načrtu;
Welcomes the fact that, under the framework of the joint EU-Africa Strategy, the EU and Africa will hold a dialogue on the concept of 'situations of fragility' aimed at reaching a common understanding and agreeing on steps that could be taken and that this dialogue is already foreseen in the Action Plan;
ponovno opozarja, da je vsaka posamezna država odgovorna zaščititi svoje prebivalce pred genocidom, vojnimi zločini, etničnim čiščenjem in zločini proti človeštvu ter da EU odločno podpira odgovornost za zaščito v skladu z resolucijo 60/1 generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 24. oktobra 2005; poudarja, da ta odgovornost vključuje uporabo trajnostnih diplomatskih, gospodarskih in pravnih pritiskov ter groženj, pri čemer so prisilna vojaška posredovanja zadnja možnost in morajo biti strogo nadzorovana;
Recalls that each individual state has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity and that the EU strongly supports the responsibility to protect, in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution 60/1 of 24 October 2005; stresses that the responsibility to protect includes the application of sustained diplomatic, economic and legal pressure and threats, coercive military intervention being only the last resort and needing to be strictly controlled;
poudarja, da je spoprijemanje s primeri ranljivosti zahtevno in zahteva znatne finančne in človeške vire, pa tudi dolgotrajno zavzemanje; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da so ti viri razpoložljivi in zadostni, ustrezne, pa tudi predvidljive načine in skladnost med donatorskimi agencijami;
Underlines that addressing situations of fragility is complex and requires significant financial and human resources, as well as long-term commitments; calls on the Commission and the Member States, therefore, to ensure that these resources are made available in a sufficient, adequate and predictable way and that there is coherence between donor agencies;
poudarja, da uporaba proračunske pomoči ni ustrezna v primerih ranljivosti, kjer so zmogljivosti revizije in nadzorovanja šibke ali jih ni; zato poziva Komisijo, naj v teh situacijah uporabi druge oblike financiranja, razen če lahko zagotovi podrobne informacije o tem, kako se denar uporablja;
Stresses that the use of budget support is not appropriate in fragility situations, where audit and monitoring capacities are weak or inexistent; calls on the Commission, therefore, to use other forms of funding in such situations, unless it can provide detailed information on how the money is being spent;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu zagotovi razvrstitev donatorjev in mednarodnih akterjev ter vrsto dela, ki ga opravljajo, da se omogoči nadzorovanje optimalne uporabe razpoložljivih sredstev in virov;
Asks the Commission to provide Parliament with a mapping of donors and international actors and the type of work they are doing, in order to allow the monitoring of the optimal use of available tools and resources;
za zaključek razprave Sveta in Komisije
to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Islamsko republiko Pakistan o partnerstvu in razvoju z dne 24. novembra 2001 (imenovanega tudi sporazum tretje generacije o sodelovanju), zlasti člena 1, ki določa, da je spoštovanje človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel bistveni element tega sporazuma,
having regard to the Cooperation Agreement of 24 November 2001 between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on Partnership and Development (also referred to as the Third Generation Cooperation Agreement), in particular Article 1 of this Agreement, which stipulates that 'respect for human rights and democratic principles ... constitutes an essential element of this agreement',
ob upoštevanju skupne deklaracije EU in Pakistana z dne 8. februarja 2007 o sporazumu za sodelovanje iz leta 2004, v kateri sta se obe strani zavezali, da bosta razvili širok formaliziran politični dialog, v katerem bo med drugim zajet boj proti terorizmu, neširjenje jedrskega orožja, spoštovanje človekovih pravic in odgovorno vodenje države,
having regard to the EU/Pakistan Joint Declaration of 8 February 2007 with regard to the 2004 Cooperation Agreement, in which both sides undertake to develop a broad formalised political dialogue whose subjects include counterterrorism, non-proliferation, human rights and good governance,
ob upoštevanju izjave Sveta z dne 8. novembra 2007 o uvedbi izrednih razmer v Pakistanu, pa tudi izjav visokega predstavnika EU Solane in vodij misij v Islamabadu z dne 4. novembra 2007;
having regard to the Council Declaration of 8 November 2007 on the imposition of emergency rule in Pakistan, as well as to the statements by EU High Representative Solana of 4 November 2007 and by the EU Heads of Mission in Islamabad of 4 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju napovedi zunanjih ministrov Commonwealtha z dne 12. novembra 2007, da bodo na prihodnjem srečanju, ki bo 22. novembra 2007, Pakistan začasno izključili, če predsednik Mušaraf do takrat ne bo vzpostavil ustavnega reda;
having regard to the Commonwealth Foreign Ministers' announcement on 12 November 2007 that they would suspend Pakistan at their forthcoming meeting on 22 November 2007 if President Musharraf had not returned to constitutional order by then,
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih resolucij o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v Pakistanu, zlasti resolucij z dne 12. julija in 25. oktobra 2007;
having regard to its previous resolutions on human rights and democracy in Pakistan, in particular those of 12 July and 25 October 2007,
ker je predsednik Mušaraf 3. novembra 2007 izdal "začasni ustavni red", ki razveljavlja ustavo in pravno državo ter ju nadomešča z vojnim pravom;
whereas on 3 November 2007 President Musharraf issued a 'Provisional Constitutional Order' (PCO), suspending the Constitution and rule of law and replacing them with martial law,
ker sta mir in varnost v Pakistanu ogrožena; ker vojno pravo vseeno ni primerna rešitev za krhke politične razmere v državi;
whereas Pakistan faces threats to its peace and security; whereas, however, martial law is not an adequate reaction to the country's fragile political situation,
ker je Pakistan država z močno in pogumno civilno družbo, uglednim sodstvom in mediji ter dolgo demokratično tradicijo;
whereas Pakistan is a country with a vibrant, courageous civil society, respected judicial and media institutions and a long democratic tradition,
je iskreno prepričan, da se ekstremizem in nestabilnost lahko najbolje omeji z uvedbo pravne države z demokratično vlado, ki jo vodijo zmerne politične stranke; zato izrecno zahteva, da se vojno pravo odpravi in da se v državi čim prej ponovno vzpostavijo vse temeljne pravice, ki jih zagotavlja ustava: to so varovanje življenja in lastnine, svoboda gibanja, zbiranja in govora, enake pravice in enako pravno varstvo za vse državljane;
Is sincerely convinced that extremism and instability can best be reduced by the rule of law under a democratic government led by moderate political parties; therefore demands unequivocally that an end be put to martial law and that all constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights be restored in the country as soon as possible, including safeguards for life and property, freedom of movement, assembly and speech, equal rights and equal legal protection of all citizens;
zahteva, da se ponovno vzpostavi sodna neodvisnost z vzpostavitvijo sodstva; zahteva takojšnjo izpustitev vseh predstavnikov odvetniške zbornice, ki so bili po mirnih uličnih protestih aretirani; obsoja zlasti nezakonit hišni pripor vrhovnega sodnika Čaudhrija;
Demands that judicial independence be restored by reinstating the judiciary; demands the immediate release of all representatives of the bar associations who have been arrested after peaceful street protests; denounces in particular the unlawful house arrest of Chief Justice Chaudhry;
poziva pakistansko vlado, naj vzpostavi potrebne razmere, ki bodo zagotovile načrtovane svobodne, poštene in pregledne volitve, ki bodo potekale 60 dni po koncu petletnega mandata parlamenta 15. novembra 2007; pri tem pozdravlja napoved predsednika Mušarafa z dne 11. novembra 2007, da bodo volitve najkasneje 9. januarja 2008;
Calls on the Government of Pakistan to implement the necessary conditions to guarantee the holding of free, fair and transparent elections as scheduled, within 60 days after Parliament completes its five-year term on 15 November 2007; welcomes in this context the announcement made by President Musharraf on 11 November 2007 that elections would be held no later than 9 January 2008;