natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je učinkovito izvajanje in izvrševanje evropskih pravil o varstvu potrošnikov gonilo za vse večjo samozavest potrošnikov in močna ovira za podjetja, ki želijo ta pravila obiti; poziva Komisijo, naj tesno spremlja prenos in izvajanje evropskega pravnega reda s tega področja in državam članicam pri tem pomaga; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj razišče možnosti za večjo opaznost politike varstva potrošnikov z ukrepi, ki podpirajo in dopolnjujejo politike držav članic in morda tudi vključujejo ustanovitev evropske agencije za varstvo potrošnikov, pri čemer naj uporabi pravno podlago člena 169 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Emphasises that the effective implementation and enforcement of EU consumer protection rules acts as a driver for increasing consumer confidence and as a forceful deterrent to businesses seeking to evade those rules; calls on the Commission to closely monitor, and help Member States with, the transposition and implementation of the EU consumer acquis; invites the Commission, in that context, to explore options, using the legal basis provided by Article 169 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, for raising the profile of consumer protection policy through measures that support and supplement Member State policies, potentially including the creation of a European Consumer Agency;
ugotavlja, da je izvajanje predpisov po EU daleč od enotnosti in da je v večini držav nekaj močnih in šibkih plati; poudarja, da te številke kažejo pomembne razlike med državami članicami glede proračuna za nadzor trga in število sodelujočih inšpektorjev; nujno poziva države članice, naj podvojijo svoja prizadevanja in povečajo sredstva, da bi zagotovile spoštovanje zakonov, ki ščitijo potrošnike in zagotavljajo konkurenco na maloprodajnem trgu;
Notes that enforcement across the EU is far from uniform and that most countries have strong and weak points; points out that figures show important differences between Member States in terms of budgets for market surveillance and numbers of inspectors involved; urges Member States to redouble their efforts and increase resources in order to ensure that laws protecting consumers and guaranteeing competition are enforced in retail markets;
meni, da so spodbujanje nadzorovanja trga in izvršilni mehanizmi ter njihovo učinkovito in obsežno izvrševanje za spodbujanje zaupanja potrošnikov odločilni, saj bo potrošniška poraba pomemben dejavnik pri oživljanju gospodarstva; meni, da je treba javnim organom dati več sredstev za preiskavo in prekinitev nezakonitega poslovnega ravnanja;
Considers that enhancing market surveillance and enforcement mechanisms and applying them efficiently and comprehensively to encourage consumer confidence is crucial, as consumer spending will be an important factor for the economic recovery; takes the view that public authorities must be given more resources to investigate and ultimately stop illegal commercial practices;
poudarja, da se potrošniški trgi hitro razvijajo, izvršilni organi pa se morajo biti zmožni spoprijeti z novimi izzivi, pred katere gospodarske in tehnološke spremembe postavljajo njihovo zmožnost učinkovitega delovanja v čezmejnem okolju, kakršen je notranji trg – za dosego tega pa so potrebna združena prizadevanja, da bi postalo izvajanje v vsej EU učinkovito in dosledno; meni, da je potreben tudi pregled regulativnega okvira, da bi popravili morebitne vrzeli;
Stresses that consumer markets evolve rapidly and enforcement authorities must be able to face the new challenges that economic and technological changes bring to their ability to be effective in a cross-border environment such as the internal market, and, in order to achieve this, efforts must be combined to make enforcement effective and consistent throughout the EU; considers that a review of the regulatory framework is also necessary to fill any regulatory gaps;
spodbuja ustanovitev neodvisnih agencij za varstvo potrošnikov v državah članicah, ki bodo zagotavljale informacije in sprožile postopke na nacionalnih sodiščih, da bi varovale interese potrošnikov; v skladu s tem spodbuja sodelovanje med agencijami za varstvo potrošnikov v vseh državah članicah;
Encourages the establishment in all Member States of independent consumer protection agencies to provide information and bring proceedings before national courts in order to protect consumers‘ interests; encourages, accordingly, cooperation between consumer protection agencies in all Member States;
spodbuja vse države članice, naj preučijo prednosti, ki bi jih imela ustanovitev Varuha pravic potrošnikov; opozarja, da v nekaterih državah članicah ta ustanova obstaja kot zunajsodni organ za sporazumno reševanje sporov na področju potrošništva, pa tudi kot svetovalna ustanova, ki deluje v soodvisnosti z državo za reševanje vprašanj, ki so v njeni pristojnosti;
Urges all Member States to consider the benefits of introducing a Consumer Ombudsman; points out that this institution exists in some Member States as an extrajudicial body for the amicable settlement of consumer disputes and also as a consultative body working alongside the State to resolve problems falling within its remit;
soglaša s Komisijo, da so lahko alternativni mehanizmi za reševanje sporov, kot na primer mediacija in arbitraža ali zunajsodne poravnave, hitra in privlačna možnost za potrošnike, ki niso bili uspešni pri neformalnem reševanju spora s podjetjem ali organizacijo za zagotavljanje storitev v javni lasti; poziva države članice, naj spodbujajo razvoj alternativnih mehanizmov za reševanje sporov, da bi okrepile raven varstva potrošnikov in karseda povečale skladnost z zakonodajo, poudarja pa, da bi morali tovrstni mehanizmi dopolnjevati, ne pa nadomeščati sodnih ali upravnih načinov izvajanja zakonodaje; poleg tega meni, da bi lahko opredelitev natančnih datumov in rokov za odgovore, ki jih morajo dati institucije in podjetja v zvezi z različnimi predloženimi zadevami, bistveno pomagala potrošnikom, ki nameravajo ukrepati za rešitev spora;
Shares the Commission's view that alternative dispute-resolution mechanisms, such as mediation and arbitration or out-of-court settlements, can be an expedient and attractive option for consumers who have been unsuccessful in informally resolving their dispute with a trader or a publicly owned organisation providing services; urges Member States to encourage the development of alternative dispute-resolution mechanisms to enhance the level of consumer protection and maximise compliance with legislation, but emphasises that such mechanisms should complement, rather than replace, judicial or administrative means of enforcement; considers also that the setting of fixed deadlines for replies from agencies and undertakings in respect of practices reported could significantly help consumers who plan to take action to resolve a dispute;
opozarja, da podatki kažejo velike razlike med državami članicami, tako da je glede odškodninskih mehanizmov še prostor za izboljšave; opominja, da sistemi kolektivnega pravnega varstva zaenkrat obstajajo v 13 državah članicah, in poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej priskrbi nadaljnjo obdelavo podatkov k zeleni knjigi z dne 27. novembra 2008 o kolektivnih odškodninah za potrošnike ( KOM(2008)0794 );
Recalls that evidence shows major differences between Member States and room for improvement in terms of redress mechanisms; recalls that judicial collective redress systems currently exist in 13 Member States and calls on the Commission to provide follow-up to its Green Paper of 27 November 2008 on Consumer Collective Redress ( COM(2008)0794 ) as quickly as possible;
poudarja, da je potrebno ustrezno izobraževanje in usposabljanje javnih uslužbencev in sodnih organov glede evropskih predpisov o varstvu potrošnikov;
Stresses the need for proper training and education of civil servants and judicial authorities as regards EU consumer protection rules;
ugotavlja, da revizija, ki jo je izvedla mreža za sodelovanje na področju varstva potrošnikov, kaže, da se organi, ki obravnavajo čezmejne primere, srečujejo s težavami zaradi pomanjkanja sredstev; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kako bi lahko zagotovili ustrezna sredstva, da bi spoštovali obveznosti po uredbi o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov;
Notes that the Consumer Protection Cooperation Network review indicates that the authorities handling cross-border cases are experiencing difficulties due to lack of resources; calls on the Commission to examine ways of securing adequate resources in order to comply with existing obligations under the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation;
izraža podporo usklajenim akcijam glede izvrševanja, ko nacionalni organi hkrati preučijo skladnost z zakonodajo EU v posameznemu sektorju; poudarja, da bi morali tovrstne akcije izvajati pogosteje (dvakrat letno) in po skupni metodologiji ter v kombinaciji z drugimi orodji;
Expresses its support for concerted enforcement actions (sweeps), in which national authorities simultaneously screen a targeted sector for compliance with EU legislation; stresses that such actions should be carried out more frequently (twice yearly), on the basis of a common methodology, and should be combined with other tools;
se zaveda pravne zahtevnosti v zvezi z objavo ugotovitev iz nadzora trga in dejavnosti izvrševanja zakonodaje ter dejstva, da za preiskovalno delo pogosto veljajo stroga pravila glede zaupnosti, vendar meni, da bi morale Komisija in države članice v primerih, ko so bile ugotovljene ponovitve nezakonitega ravnanja, vseeno objaviti te rezultate in jih razčleniti po posameznih podjetjih; meni, da bi s tem zagotovili večjo preglednost, izvršilno delo nacionalnih organov bi postalo bolj vidno, potrošnikom pa bi omogočili informirane odločitve;
Recognises the legal complexity surrounding the publication of the results of market surveillance and enforcement activities, and the fact that investigative work is often subject to strict confidentiality rules, but holds the view that the Commission and the Member States should make such results public, providing a breakdown by individual company, in cases where a recurrence of illegal practices has been identified; considers that this will ensure greater transparency, give more visibility to the national authorities‘ enforcement work and enable consumers to make well-informed choices;
poziva k okrepitvi struktur za nadzor trga v vseh državah članicah, tako da bodo izdelki, ki so na njihovem trgu, izpolnjevali stroge varnostne standarde, izdelki z napako ali nevarni izdelki pa bodo s trga hitro odstranjeni; poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja in redno pregleduje smernice, ki se uporabljajo v sistemu za hitro opozarjanje RAPEX, da bi izboljšala njegovo delovanje;
Calls for the strengthening of market surveillance structures in all Member States so that products circulating on their markets meet high safety standards and defective or dangerous products are rapidly removed from the market; calls on the Commission to monitor and periodically revise the guidelines for the rapid alert system, RAPEX, in order to improve its functioning;
v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj ostreje spremlja, kako države članice izvajajo uredbe o nadzoru trga, zlasti Uredbo (ES) 765/2008, in po potrebi nemudoma sproži postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev;
Calls on the Commission, in this connection, to do more to monitor the Member States‘ implementation of the market surveillance regulations, particularly Regulation (EC) 765/2008, and, if necessary, to bring infringement proceedings without delay;
podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da bi preučila najnovejše možnosti tehničnega nadzora in omogočila globalno sledljivost izdelkov v celotni dobavni verigi (npr. z uporabo čipov RFID ali črtnih kod); poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu predstavi sedanje pobude in najnovejša spoznanja o vzpostavitvi globalne mreže za sledljivost;
Supports the Commission's efforts to analyse the latest technical surveillance possibilities in order to ensure global traceability of products throughout the supply chain (e.g. using RFID tags or barcodes); calls on the Commission to present to Parliament its current initiatives and latest findings in relation to the development of a global traceability network;
opozarja, da Evropska mreža centrov za varstvo potrošnikov potrebuje finančna sredstva, da bi spodbudila zaupanje potrošnikov s svetovanjem državljanom o njihovih pravicah in omogočanjem dostopa do pravnega varstva, kadar so potrošniki opravili čezmejne nakupe;
Recalls that the European Consumer Centres Network needs appropriate funding in order to promote consumer confidence by advising citizens on their rights as consumers and by providing easy access to redress in cases where consumers have made cross-border purchases;
poudarja, da imajo carinski organi zaradi naraščajočega obsega uvoza v EU iz tretjih držav pomembno vlogo pri varstvu potrošnikov pred uvoženimi nevarnimi izdelki, kar zahteva vse tesnejše sodelovanje med nadzorom trga in carinskimi organi, pa tudi med carinskimi organi različnih držav članic;
Points out that, given the ever-growing volume of imports into the EU from third countries, customs authorities have an important role in protecting consumers from imported unsafe products, and that ever-closer cooperation is therefore required between market surveillance and customs authorities and also between the customs authorities of different Member States;
poudarja, da zagotavljanje varnosti izdelkov na notranjem trgu zahteva skupna prizadevanja z oblastmi tretjih držav; zato podpira pobudo Komisije, da bi pospešila mednarodno sodelovanje z izvršilnimi organi tretjih držav, zlasti Kitajsko, ZDA in Japonsko, ter poskusila doseči uradne sporazume; ugotavlja, da sta stalen dialog in izmenjava informacij o varnosti izdelkov v interesu vseh strani in srž nadgradnje potrošniškega zaupanja; poziva Komisijo, naj mu o svojem dialogu s tretjimi državami redno poroča;
Stresses that ensuring the safety of products circulating within the internal market necessitates combining efforts with third-country authorities; supports, therefore, the Commission's initiative to step up international cooperation and pursue formal agreements with enforcement authorities in third countries, in particular China, the USA and Japan; notes that continued dialogue and information-sharing on product safety is in the interest of all parties and central to building consumer confidence; calls on the Commission to report back to Parliament on its dialogue with third countries at regular intervals;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 2010 o mreži Solvit ( 2009/2138(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 9 March 2010 on SOLVIT ( 2009/2138(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o učinkovitem reševanju problemov na notranjem trgu (Solvit) KOM(2001)0702 .
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Effective Problem Solving in the Internal Market (‘SOLVIT’) COM(2001)0702 .
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2001 o načelih za uporabo mreže Solvit za reševanje problemov notranjega trga UL L 331, 15.12.2001, str.
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 7 December 2001 on principles for using ‘SOLVIT’ – the Internal Market Problem Solving Network OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 1. marca 2002, v katerih je Svet potrdil zavezo držav članic k učinkovitemu delovanju sistema Solvit in njegovih načel,
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 1 March 2002, whereby the Council confirmed the commitment of Member States to the effective operation of the SOLVIT system and to its principles,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z dne 12. julija 2004 o prenosu v nacionalno zakonodajo direktiv, ki vplivajo na notranji trg UL L 98, 16.4.2005, str.
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 12 July 2004 on the transposition into national law of Directives affecting the internal market OJ L 98, 16.4.2005, p.
, med drugim s posredovanjem informacij in mrež za pomoč, ki jih podpira Komisija,
by streamlining information and assistance networks supported by the Commission,
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 8. maja 2008 o akcijskem načrtu za integriran pristop k zagotavljanju podpornih storitev za notranji trg državljanom in podjetjem SEC(2008)1882 .
having regard to the Commission staff working paper of 8 May 2008 on an Action plan on an integrated approach for providing Single Market Assistance Services to citizens and business SEC(2008)1882 .
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o indeksu notranjega trga št. 19 SEC(2009)1007 .
having regard to the Commission staff working paper on Internal Market Scoreboard No 19 SEC(2009)1007 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o reviziji enotnega trga ter premagovanju ovir in neučinkovitosti z boljšim izvajanjem in uveljavljanjem UL C 187 E, 24.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on the Single Market Review: tackling barriers and inefficiencies through better implementation and enforcement OJ C 187 E, 24.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. septembra 2008 o pregledu notranjega trga Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0421 .
having regard to its resolution of 23 September 2008 on the Internal Market Scoreboard Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0421 .
ob upoštevanju poročila mreže Solvit 2008 o njenem razvoju in uspešnosti za leto 2008 SEC(2009)0142 .
having regard to the SOLVIT 2008 Report entitled ‘Development and performance of the SOLVIT network in 2008’ SEC(2009)0142 .
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z 29. junija 2009 o ukrepih za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga UL L 176, 7.7.2009, str.
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 29 June 2009 on measures to improve the functioning of the single market OJ L 176, 7.7.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju zaključkov Sveta (konkurenčnost – notranji trg, industrija in raziskave) z dne 24. septembra 2009 o izboljšanju delovanja notranjega trga Dokument Sveta št. 13024/09.
having regard to the Council conclusions (Competitiveness - Internal Market, Industry and Research) of 24 September 2009 on ‘How to make the Internal Market work better’ Council document 13024/09.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o dejavnostih za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga SEC(2009)0881 .
having regard to the Commission staff working document on Commission activities to improve the functioning of the single market SEC(2009)0881 .
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o upravnem sodelovanju na notranjem trgu SEC(2009)0882 .
having regard to the Commission staff working document on administrative cooperation in the single market SEC(2009)0882 .
ob upoštevanju člena 119(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 119(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za peticije ( A7-0027/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0027/2010 ),
ker si morajo Komisija, Parlament, Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in države članice bolj prizadevati za opredelitev pravic državljanov, jih o njih obveščati ter jim jih pomagati uveljavljati, saj bo zaradi tega notranji trg bolje deloval,
whereas the Commission, Parliament, the European Ombudsman and the Member States need to do more to define and provide information on citizens‘ rights and to help citizens enjoy those rights; whereas this would also enable the internal market to work better,
ker je za čezmejno odpravljanje ovir in uveljavljanje pravic prostega gibanja bistvena večja preglednost,
whereas increasing transparency is key to overcoming obstacles to movement across borders and to enforcing free-movement rights,
ker morajo Komisija in države članice občutno izboljšati svoja prizadevanja, da bi izboljšale ozaveščenost o možnostih, ki jih ponuja notranji trg državljanom in podjetjem,
whereas there needs to be a marked improvement on the part of the Commission and the Member States in raising awareness of the opportunities that the internal market offers for citizens and businesses,
ker je bil na notranjem trgu dosežen precejšen napredek, vendar še vedno obstajajo ovire za njegovo popolno delovanje,
whereas the internal market has made major progress but obstacles to its full and proper functioning still exist,
ker mora biti v primeru napačno uporabljenih pravil notranjega trga na voljo hiter dostop do pravnega varstva tudi brez sodnih postopkov,
whereas, when internal market rules are misapplied, speedy redress not necessarily involving legal action needs to be available,
ker bo lahko mreža Solvit, ko bo v celoti delovala, preprečila prekomerno sprožanje postopkov pred sodišči, kjer so postopki mnogokrat zapleteni in mehanizmi za zagotavljanje pravne zaščite posameznikov pogosto ovirajo dostop do pravnega varstva,
whereas the SOLVIT network, when it is fully operational, will be able to prevent excessive recourse being had to the judicial system, where procedures are often complex, and mechanisms for guaranteeing the defence of individuals frequently hamper access to justice,
ker se državljani in podjetja zanašajo na učinkovito izvajanje predpisov o notranjem trgu, da bi lahko v celoti izkoristili možnosti, ki jih ta trg nudi,
whereas citizens and businesses rely on effective enforcement of internal market rules to help them to benefit fully from the internal market's potential,
ker bi morale države članice s podporo Komisije izboljšati zmogljivosti svojih mehanizmov za reševanje problemov, da bi pomagale državljanom uveljavljati njihove pravice,
whereas Member States should, with the support of the Commission, improve problem-solving mechanisms‘ ability to help citizens assert their rights,
ker so Komisija in države članice leta 2002 ustvarile mrežo Solvit za reševanje problemov, s katerimi se državljani in podjetja srečujejo zaradi napačne uporabe zakonodaje o notranjem trgu,
whereas the SOLVIT network was created by the Commission and the Member States in 2002 with the aim of solving problems that arise for citizens and businesses due to the misapplication of internal market law,
ker je Solvit spletna mreža za reševanje problemov, v kateri države članice (pa tudi Norveška, Islandija in Lihtenštajn) sodelujejo pri nesodnemu reševanju težav, na katere naletijo državljani in podjetja, ker javni organi napačno uporabljajo zakonodajo o notranjem trgu,
whereas SOLVIT is an online problem-solving network in which EU Member States (as well as Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) work together to solve – without legal proceedings – problems encountered by citizens and businesses as a result of the misapplication of internal market law by public authorities,
ker velja Solvit za sorazmerno uspešen sistem za zagotavljanje pravnega varstva brez uradnih postopkov v povprečju desetih tednov, pri čemer bi bilo lahko reševanje problemov notranjega trga prek mreže Solvit zgled dobre prakse tudi za druge podporne storitve notranjega trga,
whereas SOLVIT is considered a relatively successful system providing redress, without formal procedures, within an average of 10 weeks, and whereas the solving of internal market problems by SOLVIT could be a model of good practice for other Single Market Assistance Services,
ker mreža Solvit vendarle ne bi smela biti nadomestilo za pravno obravnavanje kršitev, kar je naloga Komisije, niti izgovor za manjše prizadevanje v državah članicah za pravilen in pravočasen prenos direktiv EU,
whereas SOLVIT should, however, be neither a substitute for the Commission's legal work on infringements, nor an excuse to work less ambitiously in the Member States in order to transpose EU directives in a timely and proper fashion,
ker veliko državljanov, ki se soočajo s težavami na notranjem trgu, težave pa spadajo v pristojnost mreže Solvit, te mreže ne pozna in pomoč zato išče pri evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic,
whereas many citizens who have a problem relating to the internal market that comes within the scope of SOLVIT are not aware of SOLVIT and therefore turn to the European Ombudsman with their problem;