natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju programa z naslovom Usklajevanje z novim zakonodajnim okvirom (Sklep 768/2008), ki ga je 15. aprila 2010 pripravil generalni direktorat za podjetništvo in industrijo,
having regard to the Roadmap entitled ‘Alignment to the New Legislative Framework (Decision 768/2008)’, DG Enterprise and Industry, 15 April 2010,
ob upoštevanju programa z naslovom Revizija Direktive 2001/95/EGS Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 3. decembra 2001 o splošni varnosti proizvodov, ki ga je 25. marca 2010 pripravil generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov,
having regard to the Roadmap entitled ‘Review of Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (GPSD)’, DG Health and Consumers, 25 March 2010,
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o razmerju med Direktivo o splošni varnosti proizvodov 2001/95/ES in določbami o nadzoru trga iz Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008, ki ga je 2. marca 2010 pripravil generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov,
having regard to the Commission Working Paper on the relationship between the General Products Safety Directive 2001/95/EC and the market surveillance provisions of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, DG Health and Consumers, 2 March 2010,
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom Revizija direktive o splošni varnosti proizvodov: določitev ključnih vprašanj, ki ga je 15. septembra 2009 pripravil generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov,
having regard to the Commission Working Document entitled ‘Revision of the General Product Safety Directive: Identification of the Key Issues’, DG Health and Consumers, 15 September 2009,
ob upoštevanju informativnega dokumenta o nadzoru trga v državah članicah, ki ga je naročil odbor IMCO in je bil objavljen oktobra 2009,
having regard to the briefing paper commissioned by the IMCO Committee on Market Surveillance in the Member States, published in October 2009,
ob upoštevanju informativnega dokumenta o reviziji direktive o splošni varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga, ki ga je naročil odbor IMCO in je bil objavljen septembra 2010,
having regard to the briefing paper commissioned by the IMCO Committee on the Revision of the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) and Market Surveillance, published in September 2010,
ob upoštevanju delavnice o reviziji direktive o splošni varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga, ki je potekala 30. septembra 2010,
having regard to the workshop on the Revision of the General Product Safety Directive and Market Surveillance held on 30 September 2010,
ob upoštevanju tristranskega vrha EU-ZDA-Kitajska v Šanghaju 25. in 26. oktobra 2010,
having regard to the EU-US-China trilateral Summit held in Shanghai on 25-26 October 2010,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0033/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0033/2011 ),
ker je nujno treba zagotoviti varnost vseh proizvodov, danih na trg EU, da bi med drugim zagotovili visoko stopnjo varstva potrošnikov,
whereas it is essential to ensure that all products placed on the EU market are safe so as to guarantee a high level of protection for consumers among others,
ker je bil julija 2008 sprejet nov zakonodajni okvir, od 1. januarja 2010 pa se uporablja nova Uredba (ES) št. 765/2008 o nadzoru trga,
whereas the New Legislative Framework (hereinafter the NLF) was adopted in July 2008, and Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 on market surveillance has been applicable as of 1 January 2010,
ker je treba Direktivo 2001/95/ES o splošni varnosti proizvodov (v nadaljevanju: DSVP), ki na ravni Skupnosti določa varnostne zahteve za proizvode za potrošnike, pregledati in uskladiti z novim zakonodajnim okvirom, in sicer s povezovanjem, zlasti z uredbo o nadzoru trga,
whereas the General Product Safety Directive 2001/95/EC (hereinafter the GPSD), which establishes at Community level general safety requirements for consumer products, has to be reviewed and brought into conformity with the NLF through integration, in particular with the Regulation on market surveillance,
ker zakonodajni okvir o varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga sestavljajo tri plasti zakonskih aktov (DSVP, nov zakonodajni okvir in direktive o uskladitvi posameznih sektorjev), kar povzroča negotovost in zmedo na notranjem trgu,
whereas the product safety and market surveillance legislative framework consists of three layers of legal acts (GPSD, NLF and sector-specific harmonisation directives), which leads to uncertainties and confusion in the internal market,
ker se stopnja nadzora trga precej razlikuje med državami članicami in ker številne države članice niso določile potrebnih virov za učinkovit nadzor trga in različno tolmačijo „proizvode, ki pomenijo resno nevarnost“, kar lahko ustvari ovire za prosti pretok blaga, izkrivlja konkurenco in ogrozi varnost potrošnikov na notranjem trgu,
whereas the level of market surveillance differs considerably among Member States and a number of them fail to designate necessary resources for efficient market surveillance and interpret ‘products posing serious risk’ differently, which can create barriers to the free movement of goods; disturb competition and jeopardise consumers' safety within the internal market,
ker so sodelovanje med organi za nadzor trga in skupni ukrepi za nadzor trga nujni in bi jih bilo treba še okrepiti ter jim nameniti sredstva,
whereas cooperation among market surveillance authorities and joint market surveillance actions are essential and should therefore be strengthened further and resources delegated thereto,
ker uredbe v primerjavi z direktivami prinašajo jasnost, predvidljivost in učinkovitost, kot je navedeno tudi v poročilu Maria Montija,
whereas regulations bring the advantages of clarity, predictability and effectiveness compared with directives, as is also stated in the Monti Report,
Nadzor trga
Market Surveillance
je prepričan, da sedanji zakonodajni okvir za nadzor trga ne zagotavlja zadostne skladnosti ter ga je zato treba pregledati in nadalje uskladiti;
Believes that the current legislative framework for market surveillance does not provide enough coherence and should therefore be reviewed and further coordinated;
predlaga Komisiji, naj vzpostavi skupni evropski okvir za nadzor trga glede vseh proizvodov, ki so na notranjem trgu EU ali nanj vstopajo; poziva Komisijo, naj odigra dejavnejšo vlogo pri usklajevanju dejavnosti evropskih organov za nadzor trga, carinskih organov in pristojnih organov v državah članicah;
Proposes that the Commission establish a common European framework for market surveillance, concerning all products on the internal market or entering the EU market; calls on the Commission to play a more active role in coordinating the activities of the European market surveillance authorities, the customs authorities and the competent authorities of the Member States;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj namenijo primerna sredstva za učinkovite dejavnosti nadzora trga; poudarja, da lahko pomanjkljivi sistemi za nadzor trga povzročajo izkrivljanje konkurence, ogrožajo varnost potrošnikov in spodjedajo zaupanje državljanov v notranji trg; poudarja, da je zelo pomembno zavarovati zunanje meje enotnega trga, zlasti večja pomorska pristanišča, ter Komisijo in države članice poziva, naj sprejmejo ukrepe proti nezakonitim proizvodom iz tretjih držav; predlaga, da Komisija opravi celovito oceno točk za vstop proizvodov na trg EU, vključno z oceno sredstev, ki so potrebna za zagotovitev ustreznega nadzora;
Calls on Member States and the Commission to deploy adequate resources for efficient market surveillance activities; emphasises that failing market surveillance systems could generate a distortion of competition, jeopardise consumers' safety and undermine citizens' trust in the internal market; points out the importance of securing the external borders of the single market, in particular the major sea ports, and calls on the Commission and the Member States to take measures against illegal products from third countries; suggests that the Commission undertake a full assessment of the points of entry of products into the EU market, including an assessment of the resources needed to guarantee adequate control;
poziva države članice, naj usklajeno sprejmejo odvračalne kazni, vključno z velikimi globami, za gospodarske subjekte, ki namerno uvedejo nevarne ali neskladne proizvode na enotni trg; predlaga, naj bodo prepovedi proizvodov čim večkrat javno objavljene, da se poveča vidnost nadzora na mejah in nadzora trga ter da bi gospodarske subjekte odvrnili od nezakonitega poslovanja;
Calls on Member States to introduce in a coordinated manner penalties, including heavy fines, for economic operators who deliberately introduce dangerous or non-compliant products into the single market; proposes that product bans should be made public as often as possible in order to increase the visibility of border controls and market surveillance and to deter criminal market operators;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z organi za nadzor trga in carinskimi organi še naprej sofinancira skupne ukrepe za nadzor trga;
Calls on the Commission with the participation of market surveillance authorities and of the customs authorities to co-fund further joint market surveillance actions;
poudarja, da si morajo države članice izmenjevati najboljše prakse; poziva k skupnemu sodelovanju, združevanju znanja in izkušenj ter izmenjavi najboljših praks med organi za nadzor trga; opozarja na pomen sodelovanja med carinskimi organi in organi za nadzor trga na zunanjih mejah pri opravljanju ustreznih pregledov proizvodov, ki vstopajo v Skupnost; priznava pomemben prispevek, ki ga ima danes PROSAFE pri usklajevanju skupnih ukrepov za nadzor trga in izmenjavi preizkušenih in preverjenih praks v okviru DSVP; zato poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, pod katerimi pogoji bi lahko bil PROSAFE platforma za razširjeno usklajevanje med državami članicami za harmonizirane in neharmonizirane proizvode; meni, da je to nujno za vzpostavitev pravne osnove in zagotovitev, da bo imel PROSAFE dovolj sredstev za izpolnjevanje te naloge; poudarja, da usklajevanje prek mreže PROSAFE danes ovirajo omejena sredstva in neformalna struktura;
Emphasises the necessity of sharing best practices among the Member States; calls for joint cooperation, pooling of know-how and sharing of best practices among market surveillance authorities; recalls the importance of cooperation between customs and market surveillance authorities at the external borders to carry out appropriate checks on products entering the Community; recognises the important contribution made today by PROSAFE as regards the coordination of joint market surveillance actions and the exchange of tried and tested practices in the framework of the GPSD; therefore calls on the Commission to consider under what conditions PROSAFE could serve as platform for an extended coordination between Member States for harmonised and non-harmonised products; considers it necessary to establish a legal basis and to allocate sufficient resources to PROSAFE to carry out this task; points out that coordination through PROSAFE today is restricted by limited resources and its informal structure;
poziva države članice EU, naj si poizvedbe in študije v zvezi z varnostjo proizvodov izmenjujejo z drugimi državami članicami; meni, da bi bilo treba vključiti referenčne številke zadevnih proizvodov, da bi drugim organom olajšali prepoznavanje, saj bi jim lahko koristilo, če bi prevedli in uporabili informacije iz študij; poziva države članice, naj svojim pristojnim organom omogočijo sprejem ukrepov za nadzor trga na podlagi rezultatov preskusov ali študij, vključno s tistimi, ki so jih predložile druge države članice, da se prepreči podvajanje dela;
Calls upon the EU Member States to share product safety related inquiries and studies with other Member States; considers that the reference numbers of the products concerned should be included to facilitate product identification by other authorities, who could benefit from translating and using the information provided in the studies; calls upon Member States to allow their competent authorities to take market surveillance measures on the basis of test results or studies including those delivered by other Member States, in order to avoid duplication of work;
predlaga ustanovitev uradov za izobraževanje o varnosti proizvodov, npr. v okviru kontaktnih služb o proizvodih, ki lahko olajšajo usposabljanje in prenos informacij med gospodarskimi panogami;
Suggests establishing offices for education on product safety e.g. in the framework of the Product Contact Points, that can facilitate training and transfer information across industries;
poudarja, da globalizacija, vse več zunanjega izvajanja in povečevanje mednarodne trgovine pomenijo, da se na trgih po vsem svetu trguje z vedno več izdelki; meni, da je tesno sodelovanje med globalnimi regulatorji in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi na področju varnosti potrošniških izdelkov bistveno za obravnavanje izzivov, ki jih povzročajo zapletene dobavne verige in večji obseg trgovine;
Points out that globalisation, increased outsourcing and the growth in international trade mean that more products are being traded on markets across the world; considers that close cooperation between global regulators and other stakeholders in the area of consumer product safety is key to addressing the challenges posed by complex supply chains and the higher volume of trade;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi mednarodno sodelovanje v okviru Mednarodnega odbora za zdravje in varnost potrošniških proizvodov (ICPSC) za izmenjavo preizkušenih in preverjenih praks ter skupno preprečevanje proizvodnje nevarnih snovi v tretjih državah, ki so namenjene izvozu na evropski enotni trg;
Calls on the Commission to intensify international cooperation in the international Consumer Product Safety Caucus so as to exchange tried and tested practices and jointly to prevent the production in third countries of dangerous substances intended for export to the European single market;
Revizija DSVP
Revision of the GPSD
Uskladitev DSVP in novega zakonodajnega okvira – nova uredba o splošni varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga
Alignment of GPSD and NLF - a new General Product Safety and Market Surveillance Regulation
podpira revizijo DSVP in Uredbe (ES) št. 765/2008 glede opredelitev pojmov in obveznosti za gospodarske subjekte, kot so opredeljene v Sklepu št. 768/2008/ES, pri čemer je treba preprečiti nastanek nepotrebnih upravnih obremenitev, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja;
Supports the revision of the GPSD and of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 with regard to definitions and obligations for economic operators as defined in Decision N° 768/2008/EC, while avoiding the creation of unnecessary administrative burdens, especially for SMEs;
meni, da je ena sama uredba edini način, da se za vse proizvode zagotovi enoten sistem za nadzor trga; zato poziva Komisijo, naj za vse proizvode vzpostavi en sistem za nadzor trga, temelječ na zakonodajnem aktu, ki bo zajemal tako DSVP kot Uredbo (ES) št. 765/2009; meni, da bi bilo treba ta novi zakonodajni akt pripraviti za dosego visoke ravni varnosti proizvodov in nadzora trga, pri tem pa pojasniti pravno podlago in upoštevati natančneje oblikovane določbe v obeh obstoječih zakonodajnih aktih;
considers that having one single regulation is the only way to have one single market surveillance system for all products; therefore urges the Commission to establish a single market surveillance system for all products, based on one legislative act covering both the GPSD and Regulation (EC) No 765/2008; considers that this new legislative act should be created to achieve a high level of product safety and market surveillance, clarifying the legal basis and taking into account the provisions developed more fully in the two existing legislative acts;
poziva k uskladitvi zahtev po sledljivosti v DSVP in novem zakonodajnem okviru, da bi zagotovili dosleden sistem sledljivosti brez ustvarjanja novih birokratskih ovir;
Calls for alignment between traceability requirements in the GPSD and the NLF so as to guarantee a coherent traceability system avoiding the creation of new red tape;
poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o razvoju natančnejših meril za ocenjevanje varnosti in tveganj zaradi neskladnosti proizvodov z zakonodajo EU;
Requests the Commission to consider developing more precise criteria for evaluating safety and risks stemming from the non-compliance of products with EU legislation;
šteje za problematično, da proizvodi ponudnikov storitev niso zajeti v sedanji DSVP, kar pomeni, da se splošne varnostne zahteve uporabljajo, kadar s proizvodom ravna potrošnik v prostorih ponudnika storitev, kadar pa z istim proizvodom ravna ponudnik storitev, pa ne; poudarja potrebo po zapolnitvi te pravne vrzeli;
Regards it as problematic that products operated by service providers are not covered by the current GPSD, i.e. that general safety requirements apply when the product is handled by consumer on the premises of the service provider, but not if the same product is operated by the service provider; stresses the need to rectify this legal loophole;
poziva k poenostavitvi evropske zakonodaje o varnosti proizvodov, zlasti glede ciljev „boljše priprave zakonodaje“ in „najprej pomisli na male“, ki si jih je zastavila Komisija v sporočilu „K aktu za enotni trg“, ter spodbuja vključitev določb o proizvodih, ki spominjajo na hrano, v revidirani predlog;
Calls for the simplification of European product safety legislation, in particular as regards the Commission objectives ‘better law-making’ and ‘think small first’ as set out in the Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act’, and urges that the provisions on Food-Imitating Products be included in the revised proposal;
poziva, da bi za zagotovitev varnosti najširšega obsega posebej ranljivih potrošnikov vključili navedbo invalidov (skupaj z navajanjem otrok in starejših, ki so že zajeti);
Calls, in order to ensure the safety of the widest range of particularly vulnerable consumers, for the introduction of a reference to people with disabilities (along with the references to children and elderly people that are already present);
poziva Komisijo, naj za proizvajalce določi obveznost pripravljanja analiz tveganja v fazi zasnove; poziva, naj se v primeru ugotovitve tveganj slednja navedejo v dokumentaciji, ta pa da na voljo javnim organom;
Calls on the Commission to include an obligation for manufacturers to carry out a risk analysis in their design phase; urges that if any risks are identified they should be documented and made available to the public authorities;
poudarja potrebo po učinkovitejšem zakonodajnem okviru, ki bi omogočal hitre posege in zanesljive dolgoročne rešitve brez prenašanja političnih odločitev na organe za standardizacijo ali Komisijo, kadar ni jasnega niza bistvenih zahtev politike, kakršen obstaja pri usklajeni zakonodaji;
Stresses the need for a more effective regulatory framework, allowing quick interventions and reliable long-term solutions, without delegating political decisions to the standardisation bodies or to the Commission in the absence of a clear set of essential policy requirements such as exists for harmonised legislation;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba proizvode, ki pomenijo resno nevarnost, čim prej trajno umakniti ali odpoklicati s trga, zagotoviti pa je treba tudi sledljivost prek celotne dobavne verige, kar zahteva zadostna sredstva za organe za nadzor trga;
Stresses that products posing serious risks must be permanently withdrawn or recalled from the market as quickly as possible and that traceability throughout the supply chain must be ensured, which calls for sufficient resources for the market surveillance authorities;
poudarja, da je pomembna zanesljiva sledljivost na vseh stopnjah življenjskega cikla proizvodov, obenem pa je treba zagotoviti, da se zaradi tega ne bi povečale upravne obremenitve;
Underlines the importance of ensuring reliable traceability throughout all stages of the life of a product, while making sure that this does not lead to increased administrative burdens;
poudarja, kako pomembna sta sledljivost izdelkov in sledenje etiket za določitev države izvora izdelka in odgovornega proizvajalca;
Underlines the importance of product traceability and tracking labels for determining the country of origin of the product and the manufacturer responsible;
vztraja pri učinkovitem izvrševanju že vzpostavljenih postopkov za identifikacijo; spodbuja Komisijo, naj oceni in ovrednoti uporabo novih tehnologij, pri čemer upošteva, da bi morala biti uporaba novih tehnologij sorazmerna in ne bi smela ogrožati zasebnosti, varnosti in varstva potrošnikov;
Insists on effective enforcement of the identification procedures that are already in place; encourages the Commission to make assessments and evaluations on the use of new technologies, while considering that the usage of new technologies should be proportionate and should not endanger the privacy, security and safety of the consumer;
vseeno poudarja, da ne bi smeli vsiljevati ene same tehnične rešitve kot uradnega sistema/metode sledljivosti na trgu EU, in poziva k splošni sorazmernosti;
Stresses however, that no single technical solution should be imposed as the official traceability system/method within the EU market; and calls for overall proportionality;
poudarja potrebo po izboljšanju in nadaljnji krepitvi izmenjave podatkov v okviru sistema RAPEX v zvezi z nevarnimi proizvodi iz tretjih držav (kot sta Kitajska in Indija) in po oceni njegovih zadnjih študij;
Emphasises the need to improve and further strengthen RAPEX exchanges of information in respect of dangerous products from third countries (such as China and India) and for its latest studies to be evaluated;
priznava, da je RAPEX koristno in učinkovito orodje za širjenje informacij med državami članicami o sprejetih ukrepih glede nevarnih proizvodov, vendar meni, da bi ga bilo mogoče še izboljšati;
Acknowledges that RAPEX is a useful and efficient tool for disseminating information among the Member States about the measures taken with regard to dangerous products, but believes that this tool can be further improved;
poziva Komisijo, naj strokovnjakom za varnost proizvodov, proizvajalcem, trgovinskim in potrošniškim organizacijam in nacionalnim organom omogoči dostop do vseh ustreznih informacij ob hkratnem zagotavljanju potrebne zaupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj poveča osveščenost o sistemu RAPEX in sistemu odpoklica EU zunaj EU;
Calls on the Commission to allow product safety professionals, producers, trade and consumer organisations and national authorities to have access to all relevant information while ensuring the necessary confidentiality; calls on the Commission to improve awareness of RAPEX and the EU recall systems outside the EU;
pozdravlja nove smernice RAPEX, ki prispevajo k izboljšanju delovanja sistema RAPEX; poziva Komisijo, naj uskladi novo metodo ocenjevanja tveganja s tistimi, ki veljajo za usklajene proizvode, da bi tako pomagala organom za nadzor trga pri njihovem delu;
Welcomes the new RAPEX guidelines which contribute to the improvement of the operation of RAPEX; invites the Commission to streamline the new risk assessment method with those in place for harmonised products to assist market surveillance authorities in their work;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni razvrstitev proizvodov v kategorijo „resno tveganje“ za prijave v sistem RAPEX;
Calls on the Commission to explain the classification of products as a ‘serious risk’ in RAPEX notifications;