natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije z dne 5. septembra 2007 in njena prizadevanja za izboljšanje tekočih delovnih metod, da bi med prednostne naloge uvrstili upravljanje tekočih postopkov in jih pospešili; obžaluje, da Komisija še ni odgovorila ali se odzvala na zgoraj navedeno resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 21. februarja 2008, v kateri Parlament Komisijo poziva, naj posreduje natančne podatke o različnih vidikih uporabe prava Skupnosti, s posebnim poudarkom na oblikovanju nove, prej omenjene metode dela;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 5 September 2007 and the Commission's undertaking to improve current working methods with a view to prioritising and accelerating the handling and management of existing proceedings; points out, none the less, that the Commission has not yet responded to or acted upon Parliament's abovementioned resolution of 21 February 2008, in which it calls on the Commission to provide specific information on various aspects of the implementation of Community law, with particular reference to the development of the abovementioned new working method;
je globoko zaskrbljen, da bi nova metoda dela, ki predvideva napotitev pritožb, ki jih prejme Komisija, zadevni državi članici (prvi odgovorni za nepravilno uporabo prava Skupnosti), odvzela institucionalno odgovornost Komisiji, ki je, kot to predvideva člen 221 Pogodbe ES, "varuh pogodb"; ugotavlja, da je Komisija pogosto zadnja instanca, na katero se državljani lahko obrnejo, ko opazijo nepravilno uporabo prava Skupnosti; zahteva od Komisije, da Parlamentu do novembra 2008 predloži prvo poročilo o postopkih in izidih iz prvih šestih mesecev pilotskega projekta, ki se je začel 15. aprila 2008 in ki vključuje 15 držav članic;
Is deeply concerned that, under the new working method, which provides for complaints received by the Commission to be referred back to the Member State concerned (which is the party responsible for the incorrect application of Community law in the first place), the Commission may be failing to meet its institutional responsibility for ensuring the application of Community law as 'guardian of the treaties', in accordance with Article 211 of the EC Treaty; notes that the Commission is frequently the only remaining body to which citizens can turn to complain about the failure to apply Community law; urges the Commission to submit to Parliament a first report by November 2008 on the procedures followed and results obtained during the first six months of the pilot project which commenced on 15 April 2008 and which involves 15 Member States;
poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 211 Pogodbe ES Komisija tista institucija, ki je odgovorna, da se določbe Pogodbe in ukrepi, ki jih institucije sprejmejo v skladu s Pogodbo, izvajajo, po členu 226 pa je pooblaščena tudi za ukrepanje proti vsaki državi članici, ki ne izpolnjuje obveznosti iz Pogodbe;
Stresses that, under Article 211 of the EC Treaty, the Commission is the institution responsible for ensuring that the provisions of the Treaty and the measures taken by the institutions pursuant thereto are applied, and, under Article 226, is empowered to take action against any Member State failing to fulfil a Treaty obligation;
poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi načelo, po katerem mora biti vsa pošta, ki razkriva kršitev prava Skupnosti, zabeležena kot pritožba, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah, predvidenih v točki 3 priloge k sporočilu Komisije z dne 20. marca 2002 o odnosih s tožnikom v zadevi kršitev prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0141 ); poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvesti o načinu, na podlagi katerega bo to načelo mogoče upoštevati, ko bo v veljavi nova metoda; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvesti in se z njim posvetuje o vseh spremembah meril o izjemah, ki opravičujejo neizvajanje beleženja pritožb;
Urges the Commission to apply across the board the principle whereby any correspondence which may contain a complaint about a genuine breach of Community law must be registered as a complaint unless it is covered by the exceptional circumstances referred to in point 3 of the annex to the Commission communication of 20 March 2002 on 'relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law' ( COM(2002)0141 ); calls on the Commission to provide Parliament with details of how this principle is observed, including in cases where the new method is applied; urges the Commission to inform and consult Parliament on any changes to the exceptional criteria for failure to register complaints;
ugotavlja, da sta pri postopkih za ugotavljanje kršitev največja problema čas (povprečno 20,5 meseca od evidentiranja zadeve v določenem roku do pošiljanja pisma o predložitvi Sodišču v skladu s členom 226 Pogodbe ES) ter nezadostna uporaba člena 228; poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za skrajšanje precej dolgega roka za obravnavo pritožb ali peticij ter za iskanje praktičnih rešitev problemov, ki se pojavljajo pri odločanju od primera do primera, pri čemer naj preuči, ali ne bi bilo bolj smiselno uporabiti alternativnih metod, kot je SOLVIT, ki se je včasih ne spodbuja dovolj;
Notes that the main problems with the infringement procedure are its length (20.5 months on average from registration of the case within the specified time-limit to the sending of the letter of referral to the Court of Justice under Article 226 of the EC Treaty) and a limited use of Article 228; calls on the Commission to make every effort to shorten the relatively long delay in dealing with complaints or petitions and to find practical solutions to the problems presented by deciding, upon receipt of the case, whether alternative methods such as SOLVIT, which is still not promoted enough, are more appropriate;
ugotavlja, da se je pri preverjanju leta 2006 pokazalo, da je zelo naraslo število kršitev, ki jih je spremljalo vztrajno neizvrševanje sodb Sodišča, ter izpostavlja dva primera, ko so bile proti državam članicam uvedene finančne kazni; poziva Komisijo, naj bo bolj odločna pri uporabi člena 228 Pogodbe ES, da zagotovi ustrezno izvrševanje sodb Sodišča;
Observes a significant increase in infringement cases with continued failure to comply with the Court's judgment reviewed in 2006 and highlights two cases in which penalty payments were imposed on Member States; calls on the Commission to apply Article 228 of the EC Treaty with greater firmness in order to ensure due compliance with judgments of the Court of Justice;
poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s še vedno perečim problemom, ko države članice ne izpolnjujejo rokov za prenos direktiv, pripravi seznam direktiv, pri katerih je stopnja uporabe najnižja, ter navede razloge zanje;
Calls on the Commission, in connection with the continuing problem of Member States failing to meet deadlines for the transposition of directives, to supply a list of the directives showing the lowest rate of implementation, together with details of the likely reasons therefor;
pozdravlja napore določenih generalnih direktoratov Komisije, zlasti generalnega direktorata za okolje, ki si prizadevajo za izboljšano spremljanje skladnosti, ki ga predvidevajo direktive, obenem pa izraža nezadovoljstvo z odgovori Komisije v zvezi z zaupnostjo študij o skladnosti; ponovno poziva Komisijo, da na svojem spletišču objavi študije, ki so bile na zahtevo več generalnih direktoratov izvedene za ovrednotenje skladnosti ukrepov na nacionalni ravni z zakonodajo Skupnosti;
Commends the efforts made by some Commission Directorates-General, particularly DG Environment, to improve the conformity checks on the relevant directives, but is not satisfied with the Commission's reply regarding the confidentiality of the conformity studies; calls once more on the Commission to publish on its website the studies requested by the various Directorates-General on the evaluation of the conformity of national implementation measures with Community legislation;
opozarja, da nacionalna sodišča v večini držav članic ne sodelujejo dovolj s Sodiščem in niso pripravljena uporabljati načela primarnosti prava Skupnosti; nadalje opozarja na izredno pomembno vlogo postopka predhodnega odločanja pri ustrezni uporabi prava Skupnosti;
Draws attention to the insufficient degree of cooperation with the Court of Justice by the national courts in most Member States, which remain reluctant to apply the principle of the primacy of Community law; points, furthermore, to the extremely important role played by the preliminary ruling procedure in the proper application of Community law;
v zvezi s tem podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da opredeli področja prava Skupnosti, za katera bi bilo koristno dodatno usposabljanje nacionalnih sodnikov, pravnih strokovnjakov in javnih uslužbencev;
Supports, in this connection, the Commission's efforts to determine the areas in which additional training in Community law could be useful for national judges, legal professionals and civil servants;
meni, da so sporazumi o uporabi prava Skupnosti in tesno sodelovanje med Komisijo, Svetom, Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic in pristojnimi odbori Evropskega parlamenta bistvenega pomena za učinkovito ukrepanje v vseh primerih, ko se je predlagatelj peticije upravičeno pritožil zaradi kršitve prava Skupnosti;
Believes agreements on monitoring the application of Community law and close cooperation between the Commission, the Council, the European Ombudsman and the relevant committees of the European Parliament to be essential in order to ensure effective action in all cases where a petitioner has justifiably complained of an infringement of Community law;
poudarja, da so peticije, čeprav le redke izmed njih (4 v letu 2006) opozarjajo na dejanske kršitve prava Skupnosti, neprecenljiv vir informacij o temeljnih zahtevah državljanov Unije in bi jih morala Komisija uporabljati kot kazalce pri zakonodajnih ukrepih;
Points out that, although few of them (four in 2006) bring to light genuine infringements of Community law, petitions are an irreplaceable source of information on the fundamental requirements of Europe's citizens and should be used as a pointer by the Commission in connection with legislative measures;
poudarja, da je treba državljane bolje obveščati, da bi vsakega, ki želi vložiti pritožbo usmerili k organu, ki je na nacionalni ravni ali na ravni Skupnosti najbolj usposobljen za reševanje zadeve; meni, da bi bilo treba v institucijah EU spodbujati dobro upravljanje in storitve, da bi bili državljani deležni ustrezne obravnave in bi lahko v celoti uživali svoje pravice;
Stresses the need for better provision of information to citizens with a view to directing anyone wishing to submit a complaint towards the body best qualified to deal with the matter at either national or Community level; believes that a culture of good administration and service should be fostered within the EU institutions with a view to ensuring that citizens are dealt with properly and are able fully to enjoy their rights;
predlaga, da Komisija razmisli o možnosti, da bi svoja predstavništva v državah članicah povabila k opazovanju in spremljanju izvajanja na kraju samem;
Suggests that the Commission should continue to give consideration to the feasibility of using its Representations in Member States to observe and monitor implementation on the ground;
poudarja potrebo po razpravi o predhodno obravnavani zamisli o skupnem sprejemnem mestu za vse pritožbe državljanov in težave, povezane s spremljanjem uporabe prava Skupnosti, saj ima državljan trenutno v ta namen na voljo več možnosti (peticije, pritožbe, varuh človekovih pravic, SOLVIT itd.), zaradi česar bi centraliziran signalizacijski sistem lahko v predvidenih rokih dal bolj ciljno usmerjene rezultate;
Emphasises the need to give consideration to the previously canvassed idea of a common access point for all citizens' complaints and problems relating to the monitoring of the application of Community law, given that the citizen is currently faced with a plethora of options (petitions, complaints, the Ombudsman, SOLVIT, etc.) and therefore some form of central signposting system could provide more targeted and timely results;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so letnim poročilom Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti priložene priloge z obsežnejšimi informacijami o podatkih iz poročila in z osnovnimi statističnimi podatki;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission's annual reports on the application of Community law are accompanied by annexes expanding on the information set out in the report and supplying essential statistics;
ugotavlja, da bi morali stalni odbori Evropskega parlamenta pri spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti igrati bolj aktivno vlogo; prepričan je, da bi morali odbori imeti zadostno upravno podporo, da bi to vlogo lahko izvajali učinkovito; naproša delovno skupino, zadolženo za reformo Parlamenta, odbor za proračun in ostale pristojne organe Evropskega parlamenta, da ocenijo možnost ustanovitve posebne delovne skupine znotraj sekretariata posameznega odbora, da bi tako zagotovili stalno in učinkovito spremljanje uporabe prava Skupnosti;
Recognises that Parliament's standing committees should play a more active role in monitoring the application of Community law; is convinced that the committees should be given adequate administrative support to enable them to play this role effectively; calls on the Working Party on Parliamentary Reform, the Committee on Budgets and other relevant Parliament bodies to examine the feasibility of a special task force within each committee's secretariat so as to ensure the continuing and effective monitoring of the application of Community law;
poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, da bi spodbujali in okrepili učinkovito spremljanje uporabe prava Skupnosti na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni; meni, da imajo nacionalni parlamenti pomembno vlogo pri spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti in tako pomagajo krepiti demokratično legitimnost Evropske unije in jo približevati ljudem;
Calls for closer cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments with a view to promoting and increasing effective monitoring of the application of Community law at national, regional and local levels; considers that national parliaments have a valuable role to play in monitoring the application of Community law, thus helping to enhance the democratic legitimacy of the European Union and bring it closer to the people;
opozarja, da morajo biti v skladu s protokolom o vlogi nacionalnih parlamentov, priloženim Amsterdamski pogodbi, vse politike v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice deležne posebne pozornosti nacionalnih parlamentov in Konference odborov za evropske zadeve (COSAC); meni, da bi morala biti ta pozornost prisotna tako v začetni fazi procesa odločanja kot v fazi izvajanja evropske zakonodaje, tako da lahko evropski in nacionalni zakonodajalec uvajata nujne ukrepe v sektorjih, kjer je pristojnost deljena; posledično poziva parlamentarne odbore, pristojne na nacionalni in evropski ravni, da vzpostavijo stalne stike glede specifičnih zakonodajnih zadev, da bi tako združili vse informacije, ki lahko pripomorejo k preglednemu in učinkovitemu zakonodajnemu postopku na evropski in nacionalni ravni; pozdravlja organizacijo posebnih srečanj med evropskimi zakonodajalci, podobnim srečanju s predstavniki nacionalnih parlamentov, ki je potekalo 6. aprila 2008 ob reviziji okvirne odločitve o boju proti terorizmu in ki je omogočilo ovrednotenje ne samo težav z uporabo veljavne evropske zakonodaje, temveč tudi oceno primernosti predlogov sprememb, ki jih preverja Svet;
Points out that, under the protocol on the role of the national parliaments in the European Union annexed to the Treaty of Amsterdam, policies concerning the area of freedom, security and justice should entail special involvement by the national parliaments and the Conference of European Affairs Committees (COSAC); considers that this involvement should take place during both the decision-making phase and the implementation of European legislation to enable European and national legislators to adopt amendments and revisions which become necessary in sectors which are and will remain subject to shared competence; therefore invites the competent parliamentary committees at national and European level to establish permanent contacts on individual pieces of legislation, pooling all useful information in the interests of a more transparent and efficient legislative process at European and national level; welcomes the holding of special meetings between European legislators, such as the one recently held on 6 April 2008 with national parliaments to review the framework decision on combating terrorism, during which it was possible to assess not only the problems of implementing European legislation in force but also the relevance of proposed amendments under consideration by the Council;
poudarja, da bi ureditev iz Lizbonske pogodbe za spremljanje skladnosti z načelom subsidiarnosti nacionalnim parlamentom dodelila precej pomembnejšo vlogo pri sprejemanju zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Points out that the Lisbon Treaty arrangements for monitoring compliance with the subsidiarity principle would give the national parliaments a substantially enhanced role in Community law-making;
poudarja, da pojem državljanstva bistveno razširja domet načela o nediskriminaciji;
Points out that the concept of citizenship significantly broadens the scope of the principle of non-discrimination;
je seznanjen z nedavnim povečanjem števila sodb Sodišča, ki temeljijo na pojmu državljanstva Unije in se nanašajo na pravico do prostega gibanja, v skladu s katero država članica svojih državljanov, ki so izkoristili pravico do selitve in prebivanja v drugi državi članici, ne sme obravnavati manj ugodno kot druge državljane;
Notes the recent increase in judgments of the Court of Justice based on the concept of EU citizenship and concerning the right to move freely, under which a Member State may not treat any of its nationals who have taken advantage of their right to move and reside in another Member State less favourably than those who have not;
poziva države članice, naj spoštujejo pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije, vključno s pravico do glasovanja in kandidiranja na volitvah v Evropski parlament, ki je še posebej pomembna v luči volitev leta 2009;
Calls on the Member States to respect the rights deriving from EU citizenship, including the right to vote and stand as a candidate in elections to the European Parliament, which is of particular importance in the run-up to the 2009 elections;
ugotavlja, da je prejel peticije s pritožbami, da nekatere države članice kršijo Direktivo 2004/38/ES; opozarja, da je navedena direktiva temeljnega pomena pri zagotavljanju prostega gibanja državljanov Unije po ozemlju držav članic; poudarja, da naj bi Komisija v drugi polovici leta 2008 predložila poročilo o izvajanju navedene direktive;
Notes that Parliament has received petitions complaining of infringements of Directive 2004/38/EC by some Member States; draws attention to the fact that that directive is of fundamental importance to ensuring that EU citizens may move freely within the territory of the Member States; points out that the Commission is to submit a report in the second half of 2008 on implementation of the directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja prenos direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES in nadzoruje, ali je prenesena zakonodaja, ki so jo sprejele države članice, v skladu z določbami direktiv, ter naj s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev in neizpolnjevanja predpisov še naprej vrši pritisk na države članice, da bodo te v celoti izpolnjevale svoje obveznosti za čim hitrejši prenos direktiv; meni, da bi moral pristojni odbor Parlamenta igrati vlogo pri stalnem spremljanju obveznosti držav članic, ki izhajajo iz navedenih direktiv;
Calls on the Commission carefully to monitor the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC and whether the transposing legislation adopted by Member States is in keeping with the provisions of those directives, as well as to continue to put pressure on the Member States, by way of infringement and non-compliance proceedings, to meet their obligation fully to transpose the directives as soon as possible; believes that Parliament's competent committee should play a role in the ongoing monitoring of Member States' obligations under those directives;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija 2. julija 2008 v skladu s strategijo politike za leto 2008 sprejela predlog ( KOM(2008)0426 ) horizontalne direktive, ki bi uporabljala načelo enakega obravnavanja tudi izven okvira zaposlovanja in zagotavljala enak dostop do blaga, storitev, stanovanj, izobraževanja, socialne zaščite in ugodnosti, ter meni, da predlog pomembno prispeva k trenutnemu protidiskriminacijskemu paketu;
Welcomes the Commission's adoption on 2 July 2008, as provided for in the annual policy strategy for 2008, of the proposal ( COM(2008)0426 ) for a horizontal directive implementing the principle of equal treatment outside the scope of employment and ensuring equal access to goods, services, housing, education, social protection and social advantages, and takes the view that this constitutes an important addition to the current anti-discrimination package;
poziva Komisijo, naj temeljito preuči primere, ko države članice za izobraževanje študentov iz drugih držav uporabljajo omejitve, ki ne temeljilo na državljanstvu, da bi študentom omogočili prosto gibanje in enako obravnavo v visokošolskih sistemih držav članic;
Calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough analysis of cases where Member States apply non-nationality-based restrictions on access to education by students from other countries, with a view to ensuring that students are able to move freely and are afforded equal treatment within the higher education systems of those Member States;
poziva še zlasti države članice, ki so najbolj upravičene do strukturnih skladov iz večletnega finančnega okvira za obdobje 20072013, naj nacionalno zakonodajo hitro uskladijo s standardi EU, še posebej na področju zaščite okolja, ter naj oblikujejo razpisne postopke, ki bodo državljanom pregledni, da bi tako učinkovito uporabili razpoložljive strukturne sklade in pospešili družbeni in gospodarski razvoj na regionalni ravni;
Calls in particular on the Member States most eligible for structural funding under the multiannual financial framework for the period 2007-2013 swiftly to bring their national law properly into line with EU standards, particularly in the field of environmental protection, and to establish tendering procedures that are transparent to citizens, with a view to making effective use of available structural funding and boosting social and economic development at regional level;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the European Ombudsman and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. oktobra 2008 o strategiji za prihodnje reševanje institucionalnih vidikov regulativnih agencij ( 2008/2103(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 21 October 2008 on a strategy for the future settlement of the institutional aspects of Regulatory Agencies ( 2008/2103(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. marca 2008 z naslovom "Evropske agencije – smernice za prihodnost" ( KOM(2008)0135 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 11 March 2008 entitled 'European Agencies - The way forward' ( COM(2008)0135 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. januarja 2004 o sporočilu Komisije: "Skupni okvir za evropske regulativne agencije" UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 January 2004 on the Communication from the Commission: 'The operating framework for the European Regulatory Agencies' OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju osnutka Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 25. februarja 2005 o skupnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije ( KOM(2005)0059 ),
having regard to the draft interinstitutional agreement of 25 February 2005 on the operating framework for the European regulatory agencies ( COM(2005)0059 ),