natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da ostaja raven izterjave neupravièeno izplaèanih zneskov nizka in se med državami èlanicami razlikuje; ker se možnosti izterjave sèasoma zmanjšujejo, poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja za izboljšanje stopnje izterjave neupravièeno izplaèanih zneskov;
Notes with concern that the level of recovery of sums unduly paid remains low and varies between Member States and, since the chances of recovery decrease with time, calls on the Commission to step up its efforts to improve the recovery rate of sums unduly paid;
meni, da bi morala Komisija izvajati korektivne ukrepe, kadar ostaja raven izterjave v doloèeni državi èlanici sistematièno nizka;
Takes the view that, when in a specific Member State recovery remains systematically low, the Commission should apply corrective measures;
v celoti podpira Komisijo pri dosledni uporabi zakonodaje na podroèju zaèasne ustavitve izplaèil ter vztraja, da mora za financiranje skupne kmetijske politike veljati enak postopek, kot za že zaèete ukrepe Članica Komisije Danuta Hübner je v pisnem odgovoru odboru za proračunski nadzor zapisala "leta 2006 je Španija začasno ustavila plačila iz ESRR v pričakovanju ugotovitev revizij korektivnih ukrepov.
Assures the Commission of its full support in the rigorous application of the legislation on suspension of payments and urges that CAP funding should also be subject to the same procedure as the measures already initiated Member of the Commission Danuta Hübner stated in a written answer to the Committee on Budgetary Control that "in 2006 ERDF payment claims have been held back by Spain pending the results of audits of remedial measures.
Drugi primeri so ustavitve plačil iz ESRR za vse programe v Angliji, programe za cilj 3 in za nekatere regionalne programe v Franciji, programe v Kalabriji in regijah na Siciliji v Italiji ter leta 2006 za program EQUAL v Španiji in Italiji".
Other examples are interruptions of ESF payments in 2005 for all programmes in England, for Objective 3 programmes and some regional programmes in France, and for programmes in the Calabria and Sicily regions of Italy, and in 2006 for EQUAL in Spain and Italy".
, da se prenos sredstev ne izvede, èe Komisija nima brezpogojnih zagotovil glede zanesljivosti upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemov države èlanice, ki je upravièena do teh sredstev;
for the non-transfer of funds where the Commission does not have an absolute guarantee of the reliability of the management and control systems of the Member State which is the beneficiary of those funds;
poziva Komisijo, da oceni uèinkovitost in transparentnost sistemov spremljanja, ki se nanašajo na izplaèila kmetom, v okviru svojega letnega poroèila o zašèiti finanènih interesov Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its annual report on the protection of the Communities' financial interests;
pozdravlja delo projektne skupine za izterjavo Delovna skupina za izterjavo (Task Force Recovery) je bila ustanovljena, kot je bilo objavljeno v sporočilu Komisije o izboljšanju izterjave pravic Skupnosti, ki izhajajo iz neposrednega ali deljenega upravljanja izdatkov Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0671 ).
Welcomes the work of the Task Force Recovery The Task Force Recovery (TFR) has been created as announced in the Commission Communication "Improving the recovery of Community entitlements arising from direct and shared management of Community expenditure" ( COM(2002)0671 final).
Delovna skupina za izterjavo je skupna pobuda OLAF/AGRI, ki ji predseduje OLAF.
The TFR is a joint OLAF/AGRI initiative chaired by OLAF.
, ki je bila sposobna poravnati veliko število nepravilnosti prejšnjih let (1971 do 2006: 3061 milijonov EUR); posledièno so države èlanice izterjale 898 milijonov EUR, 1200 milijonov EUR pa je bilo poravnanih s postopkom potrjevanja obraèunov; poudarja pa, da morajo biti države èlanice bolj pazljive, da se izognejo nepravilnostim in da izterjajo denar;
, which has been able to settle a large number of the irregularities from previous years (1971 to 2006: EUR 3 061 million); consequently, the Member States have recovered EUR 898 million, and EUR 1 200 million has been settled using the "clearance of accounts" procedure; stresses, however, that the Member States should be much more vigilant in order to avoid irregularities and to recover money;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija sprejela drugo poroèilo o pomanjkljivostih pri izvajanju sistema 'èrne liste' (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1469/95 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1469/95 z dne 22. junija 1995 o ukrepih, ki jih je treba sprejeti v zvezi z nekaterimi upravičenci projektov, financiranih iz Jamstvenega sklada EKUJS (UL L 145, 29.6.1995, str.
Notes the adoption by the Commission of its second report on the shortcomings in the implementation of the 'blacklist' system (Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 Council Regulation (EC) No 1469/95 of 22 June 1995 on measures to be taken with regard to certain beneficiaries of operations financed by the Guarantee Section of the EAGGF (OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p.
) ter poziva k širši razpravi v institucijah EU o poti naprej, z znatnim poveèanjem kazni za države èlanice, ki ne izpolnjujejo svojih obveznosti glede vraèila neupravièeno izplaèanih zneskov, kot najbolj oèitnim pristopom;
) and calls for a wider debate, within the EU institutions, on the way forward, with a substantial increase in penalties for Member States that fail to fulfil their obligations with regard to the repayment of sums unduly paid being the most obvious approach;
ugotavlja, da se je pri strukturnih ukrepih znesek, ki je predmet nepravilnosti, poveèal za 17 %, s 601 milijonov EUR v letu 2005 na 703 milijonov EUR v letu 2006 (strukturni skladi 517 milijonov EUR, kohezijski skladi 186 milijonov EUR); nepravilnosti so se nanašale predvsem (75 %) na Evropski sklad za regionalni razvoj (ESRR) in Evropski socialni sklad (ESS); Nemèija, Španija, Italija, Portugalska in Združeno kraljestvo so odgovorne za približno 85 % zneska (438,1 milijona EUR), ki je bil v letu 2006 predmet nepravilnosti med strukturnimi skladi; upravièenci so pogosto zaraèunavali neupravièene izdatke, kar je bilo ugotovljeno pri pregledu dokumentov;
Points out that the amount affected by irregularities relating to structural actions increased by 17%, from EUR 601 million in 2005 to EUR 703 million in 2006 (Structural Funds EUR 517 million, Cohesion Fund EUR 186 million); these irregularities related mainly (75%) to the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the European Social Fund (ESF); Germany, Spain, Italy, Portugal and the United Kingdom accounted for approximately 85% of the amount affected (EUR 438,1 million) relating to the Structural Funds in 2006; in many cases the beneficiaries had invoiced for non-eligible expenditure; the details were uncovered following the checking of documents;
obžaluje, da je imelo od 95 projektov, ki so financirani iz strukturnih skladov in revidirani v trenutnem obdobju načrtovanja, 60 projektov materialne napake v napovedanih izdatkih projekta, kar je povzročilo povečanje nepravilnosti v predhodnem letu; meni, da je treba revidirati večje število projektov, da bi pridobljeni sklepi omogočili oblikovanje jasnih priporočil za izboljšanje finančnega upravljanja;
Regrets that, of the 95 projects funded using Structural Funds audited over the current programming period, 60 were affected by material errors in declared project expenditure, representing an increase in the number of irregularities over the previous year; considers that a greater number of projects should be audited so that the conclusions obtained permit the formulation of clear recommendations for improving financial management;
ugotavlja, da je treba za leto 2006 izterjati še 266,5 milijonov EUR od 703 milijonov EUR, medtem ko je treba za prejšnja leta iztirjati še 762 milijonov EUR; poziva Komisijo, da dvakrat letno obvesti pristojne odbore Parlamenta o doseženem napredku in posebnih ukrepih, sprejetih za pospešitev izterjave neporavnanih zneskov;
Notes that EUR 266,5 million out of a total of EUR 703 million has still to be recovered for 2006, while for previous years EUR 762 million still needs to be recovered; calls on the Commission to inform Parliament's competent committees twice a year on the progress made and the specific measures taken in order to speed up the recovery of the outstanding amounts;
ugotavlja, da se je finanèni vpliv pri predpristopnih skladih znižal s 26,5 milijona EUR v letu 2005 na 12,3 milijona EUR v letu 2006; najpogostejše napake so bile zaraèunavanje izdatkov, ki niso upravièeni do izplaèil, ter nespoštovanje pogodbenih in regulativnih pogojev; od uvedbe sredstev je bilo izterjanih 11 milijonov EUR, vendar ostaja za izterjavo še 14 milijonov EUR;
Notes that, as far as pre-accession funds are concerned, the financial impact decreased from EUR 26,5 million in 2005 to EUR 12,3 million in 2006; the most frequent errors were invoicing for non-eligible expenditure and failure to comply with contractual or regulatory conditions; EUR 11 million has been recovered since the funds were introduced, but EUR 14 million still remains to be recovered;
je še naprej preprièan, da se morajo države èlanice in institucije EU, vkljuèno z Raèunskim sodišèem, politièno zediniti o "sprejemljivi stopnji napak", èe se želi kdaj koli doseèi pozitivna izjava o zanesljivosti;
Remains convinced that Member States and EU institutions, including the Court of Auditors (ECA), must come to a political understanding on a 'tolerable error rate' if a positive declaration of assurance is ever to be achieved;
poziva Komisijo, da v letno poroèilo za leto 2008 o zašèiti finanènih interesov Skupnosti vkljuèi analizo struktur držav èlanic, ki sodelujejo v boju proti nepravilnostim; da bi imel Parlament jasnejšo sliko o izvajanju zakonodajnega okvira v zvezi z bojem proti goljufijam, bi morala ta analiza med drugim odgovoriti na naslednja vprašanja:
Calls on the Commission to include in the 2008 annual report on the protection of the Communities' financial interests an analysis of the Member States' structures involved in combating irregularities; that analysis should answer, among others, the following questions in order to give Parliament a clearer picture of the implementation of the legislative framework of the anti-fraud network:
Kateri nacionalni organi držav èlanic so del te naloge?
which national authorities in the Member States are involved in this exercise?
Kako organizirajo svoje sodelovanje?
how do they organise their cooperation?
Kakšna pooblastila za inšpekcijo imajo nacionalni organi?
what powers of inspection do the national authorities have?
Ali ti nacionalni organi delujejo na podlagi letnega programa dela?
do those national authorities operate on a basis of annual programming?
Ali morajo sestaviti poroèilo o ciljih, ki jih je treba doseèi s spremljanjem?
are they obliged to draw up a report on the objectives to be pursued in their monitoring activity?
Ali so nacionalni organi dolžni pripraviti poroèilo o uporabi sredstev Evropske unije?
are the national authorities obliged to draw up a report on the use of EU funds?
Na kakšen naèin sodelujejo z Evropskim uradom za bolj proti goljufijam in na kakšen naèin obvešèajo Komisijo o svojih ugotovitvah?
how do they cooperate with OLAF and in which way are their findings communicated to the Commission?
Do katerih evropskih podatkovnih baz imajo neposreden dostop?
to what European databases do they have direct access?
Do katerih nacionalnih podatkovnih baz ima dostop Komisija?
which national databases can the Commission access?
Kakšni so predvideni stroški nadzora?
what are the estimated costs of controls?
Kateri so mehanizmi sporoèanja nepravilnosti?
what are the mechanisms for reporting irregularities?
Kakšno je stanje v zvezi z izvajanjem Uredbe Sveta (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96?;
what is the state of play regarding implementation of Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96?
poziva Komisijo, da glede sektorja lastnih sredstev navede, katere nadaljnje ukrepe bo sprejela pri prepreèevanju goljufivega uvoza televizorjev, cigaret in ponarejanja na splošno; s tem v zvezi z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je lahko Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam odprl podružnico na Kitajskem; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi boj proti ponarejanju; poziva Komisijo, da v okviru letnega poroèila, ki bo objavljeno julija 2008, poroèa o zašèiti finanènih interesov Skupnosti za leto 2007, o pobudah in sprejetih ukrepih na podlagi resolucije Parlamenta z dne 11. oktobra 2007 o posledicah sporazuma med Skupnostjo, državami èlanicami in podjetjem Philip Morris o stopnjevanju boja proti goljufijam in tihotapljenju cigaret in o napredku, ki je bil dosežen pri izvajanju priporoèil preiskovalnega odbora Evropskega parlamenta za tranzitni sistem Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0432 .
Calls on the Commission to indicate, as regards the own resources sector, which further actions it will undertake to put a stop to the fraudulent importing of televisions, cigarettes and counterfeit goods in general; in this context, welcomes the fact that OLAF has been able to open an office in China; urges the Commission to step up the fight against counterfeiting; calls on the Commission to report back in the context of the annual report on the protection of the Communities' financial interests for 2007, which will be published in July 2008, on the initiatives and action taken on the basis of Parliament's resolution of 11 October 2007 on the implications of the agreement between the Community, Member States and Philip Morris on intensifying the fight against fraud and cigarette smuggling and the progress made in implementing the recommendations of Parliament's Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0432 .
meni, da je popolnoma nesprejemljivo, da Nemèija in Španija Komisiji že veè let ne posredujeta informacij o nepravilnostih pri kmetijskih izdatkih v elektronski obliki; ugotavlja tudi, da sta državi odgovorni za 38 % (33,2 milijona EUR) nepravilnosti in da Nemèija ne sporoèa veè podatkov o vkljuèenih osebah in družbah, èeprav je to dolžna storiti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj zoper ti dve državi uvede postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev in do zaèetka postopka zadrži 10 % izplaèil za kmetijstvo; zahteva, da predsednik Odbora za proraèunski nadzor naslovi pismo na zadevnega stalnega predstavnika in zahteva pojasnilo;
Considers it wholly unacceptable that for many years Germany and Spain have not been forwarding information to the Commission, in electronic form, on irregularities concerning agricultural expenditure; notes, furthermore, that these two countries are responsible for 38 % (EUR 33,2 million) of the irregularities and that Germany is no longer providing details of the individuals and companies involved, despite an obligation to do so; consequently, urges the Commission to start infringement procedures against these two Member States and to withhold 10 % of agricultural payments pending the procedure; calls on the chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control to send a letter to the Permanent Representations concerned requesting an explanation;
meni, da je obdobje 39 mesecev (od takrat, ko je bila storjena nepravilnost, do takrat, ko se o njej sporoèi Komisiji), nesprejemljivo, ker tak odlog izterjavo še bolj oteži; sprašuje Komisijo, katere ukrepe je sprejela, da bi države èlanice pozvala k redu; ugotavlja, da ravnanje držav èlanic kaže premalo pazljivosti;
Considers that a period of 39 months between the time when an irregularity is committed and the time when it is notified to the Commission is unacceptable, as such a delay makes recovery more difficult; asks the Commission what measures it has taken to call the Member States to order; notes that the Member States" actions indicate a degree of complacency;
sprašuje, katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija za zmanjšanje števila nepravilnosti v sektorjih za razvoj podeželja, govedine in teletine ter sadja in zelenjave;
Asks what measures the Commission has taken to reduce the number of irregularities in the rural development, beef and veal, and fruit and vegetables sectors;
poziva, naj Komisija zavzame odločno stališče, če Grčija ne bo spoštovala akcijskega načrta za uvedbo integriranega upravnega in nadzornega sistema (IACS) Letno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2006:
Calls on the Commission to take a firm stance should Greece fail to comply with the action plan for introducing the IACS The annual report of the Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 2006:
Že peto leto zapored vsebujejo izjave generalnega direktorja pridržek glede nezadostnega izvajanja IACS v Grčiji.
For the fifth consecutive year the Director General's declaration contains a reservation concerning insufficient implementation of the IACS in Greece.
Sodišče je za leto 2006 potrdilo, da se ključne kontrole še vedno niso izvajale, in sicer: obravnavanje zahtevkov, postopki inšpekcijskih pregledov, celovitost zbirke podatkov za živali in identifikacijski sistem zemljiških parcel (LPIS).'
For 2006 the Court has confirmed continuing failure to implement key controls, namely: claims handling, inspection procedures, animal database integrity and the Land Parcel Identification System."
; želi biti obveščen o skupnem znesku subvencij/pomoči, ki so bile iz proračuna Skupnosti do zdaj izplačane Grčiji za vzpostavitev sistema IACS in ali je mogoča izterjava tega zneska, če sistem do septembra 2008 ne bo v celoti deloval;
; would like to be informed about the total amount of the grants/aid from the Community budget paid to Greece to set up the IACS until now and whether this amount can be recovered if the system is not fully operational by September 2008;
glede strukturnih ukrepov ugotavlja, da je bilo 84 % nepravilnosti zabeleženo v Italiji (228,2 milijonov EUR leta 2006), Španiji (85,7 milijonov EUR leta 2006), Združenem kraljestvu (59,8 milijonov EUR leta 2006), Portugalski (37,2 milijonov EUR leta 2006) in Nemčiji 27,2 milijonov EUR leta 2006); hkrati ugotavlja, da Nemčija in Španija ne uporabljata elektronskega modula informacijskega sistema za boj proti goljufijam ter da Nemčija ne pošilja podatkov o vključenih osebah in družbah; zahteva, da predsednik Odbora za proračunski nadzor naslovi pismo na zadevnega stalnega predstavnika in zahteva pojasnilo;
Notes that, concerning structural actions, 84% of all irregularities were recorded in Italy (2006: EUR 228,2 million), Spain (2006: EUR 85,7 million), the United Kingdom (2006: EUR 59,8 million), Portugal (2006: EUR 37,2 million) and Germany (2006: EUR 27,2 million); notes, furthermore, that neither Germany nor Spain uses the electronic module of the Anti-Fraud Information System and that Germany does not send data on the individuals and companies involved; calls on the chairman of the Committee on Budgetary Control to send a letter to the Permanent Representations concerned requesting an explanation;
meni, da se je s tem v zvezi v programskem obdobju 2000-2006 pokazalo, da k ugotovljenim nepravilnostim prispevajo preveè zapletena pravila in neuèinkoviti nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi; ugotavlja, da so upravièenci pogosto pozno prejeli izplaèila; zato pozdravlja izboljšave, ki jih prinaša Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih doloèbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Considers that, in this context, the 2000-2006 programming period proved that overly complicated rules and ineffective supervisory and control systems contributed to the irregularities ascertained; points out, furthermore, that beneficiaries often received payments late; consequently, welcomes the improvements which Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
; želi, da so na splošno regionalni in lokalni organi bolj vkljuèeni v programiranje in izvajanju skladov;
has brought; calls, in general, for regional and local authorities to be more involved in the programming and implementation of the funds;
opozarja, da je Parlament v 11. odstavku svoje resolucije z dne 15. junija 2006 o zašiti finanènih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam - letno poroèilo 2004 UL C 300 E, 9.12.2006, str.
Points out that in paragraph 11 of its resolution of 15 June 2006 on protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud - 2004 annual report OJ C 300 E, 9.12.2006, p.
menil, da: "(...) je treba v obdobju poroèanja za leto 2005 posebno pozornost nameniti nepravilnostim pri strukturnih ukrepih"; vseeno pa opaža, da se zdi, da so se razmere še poslabšale;
, Parliament stated: "(...) in the 2005 reporting period, particular attention should be paid to irregularities concerning structural actions"; notes, however, that the situation seems to have worsened;
meni, da bi morala Komisija posvetiti posebno pozornost kriminalnim mrežam, specializiranim za zlorabo evropskih sredstev;
Considers that the Commission should attach particular importance to criminal networks specialising in the misappropriation of EU funds;
poziva Komisijo, naj parlamentarnemu Odboru za proračunski nadzor predloži podrobno analizo sistema ali sistemov, ki se uporabljajo pri organiziranem kriminalu za ogrozitev finančnih interesov Skupnosti, ne glede na to, ali je vpletena mafija ali ne;
Calls on the Commission to provide Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control with a detailed analysis of the system or systems used by organised crime, whether run on mafia lines or not, to undermine the Communities' financial interests;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi ugotovitve predsednika Evropskega računskega sodišča, saj so bili po njegovem mnenju "Nadzorni in kontrolni sistemi v državah članicah (...) na splošno neuspešni ali zmerno uspešni, Komisija pa izvaja le zmerno uspešen nadzor nad njihovim delovanjem" Govor pred Odborom za proračunski nadzor z dne 12. novembra 2007.
Expresses its deepest concern over the following finding of the President of the ECA: "The supervisory and control systems in the Member States were generally ineffective or moderately ineffective, and the supervision of their operation by the Commission was only moderately effective" Presentation to the Committee on Budgetary Control on 12 November 2007.
zato poziva države èlanice, da zagotovijo kakovost svojih nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ter sprejmejo, na primerni politièni ravni, nacionalno izjavo o upravljanju, ki zadeva vsa sredstva Skupnosti v skupnem upravljanju; poziva Komisijo, naj aktivno brani to idejo in v letnem poroèilu o zašèiti finanènih interesov Skupnosti poroèa o doseženem napredku;
Calls, therefore, on the Member States to guarantee the quality of their supervisory and control systems by adopting, at an appropriate political level, a national declaration on management concerning all Community spending in shared management; calls on the Commission to give active support to this idea and to report on the progress achieved in its annual report on the protection of the Communities" financial interests;
poziva Komisijo, da sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, po možnosti vključno s postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, proti tistim državam članicam, ki ne pomagajo službam Komisije pri pregledih na kraju samem, kot je opredeljeno v Uredbi Sveta (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96;
Calls on the Commission to take the appropriate measures, possibly including infringement procedures, against those Member States which do not assist the Commission services in carrying out on-the-spot checks as provided for by Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96;