natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sprememba 21 Člen 3 a (novo)
Amendment 21 Article 3 a (new)
Vsaka država članica mora sprejeti pristojnosti Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti za predhodno odločanje o veljavnosti in razlagi tega sklepa v skladu s členom 35(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
Each Member State shall accept the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Communities to give preliminary rulings on the validity and interpretation of this Decision in accordance with Article 35(2) of the Treaty on European Union.
Sprememba 22 Člen 4
Amendment 22 Article 4
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za zagotavitev, da
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that
Člen 2(5) se zato črta.
(Article 2(5) hereby falls)
Sprememba 23 Člen 4, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Amendment 23 Article 4, paragraph 1 a (new)
Če podatka ni mogoče prenesti takoj, pristojni organ objavi rok, v katerem se lahko to opravi in ki ne sme biti daljši od dvanajstih ur ali, v primeru podatka, za katerega so potrebne formalnosti in predhodne pogodbe z drugimi organi, oseminštiridesetih ur v nujnih primerih in do desetih delovnih dni v ostalih primerih.
If information cannot be provided immediately, the competent authority shall indicate immediately the timeframe within which it can be provided, which must not exceed 12 hours or, in the case of information which requires formalities or prior contacts with other authorities, 48 hours if the matter is urgent and otherwise 10 working days.
Sprememba 24 Člen 4, odstavek 1 b (novo)
Amendment 24 Article 4, paragraph 1 b (new)
Roki iz odstavka 1a začnejo teči od prejema zahteve po podatkih s strani pristojnega organa zaprošene države članice.
The time-limits laid down in paragraph 1a shall run from the time when the competent authority of the requested Member State receives the request for information.
Sprememba 25 Člen 4 a (novo)
Amendment 25 Article 4 a (new)
Policijske službe ali drugi pristojni organi pregona brez poseganja v uporabo členov 2 in 3 posredujejo policijskim službam ali drugim pristojnim organom pregona iz drugih zainteresiranih držav članic, ne da bi to kdo zahteval, vse podatke, če se zaradi resničnih vzrokov upravičeno domneva, da bi ti podatki lahko prispevali k izsleditvi in preprečevanju kaznivih dejanj ali kaznivih dejavnosti, ki so del terorističnega dejanja, ali k preiskavi na tem področju.
Without prejudice to the application of Articles 2 and 3, the police services or other competent law enforcement authorities shall, without being so requested, provide information to the police services or other competent law enforcement authorities of other Member States concerned if there are serious factual reasons to believe that the information in question could assist in the prevention, investigation or detection of offences or criminal activities which are linked to a terrorist offence.
Posredovanje podatkov v okviru odstavka 1 se omejuje na elemente, za katere se oceni, da so primerni ali potrebni za uspešno zagotavljanje odkrivanja in preprečevanja zadevnih kaznivih dejanj ali kaznivih dejavnosti ali preiskav na tem področju.
The provision of information pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be limited to what is deemed relevant and necessary for the successful prevention, investigation or detection of the offence or criminal activity in question.
Policijske službe ali drugi pristojni organi pregona morajo biti obveščeni o utemeljenih resničnih vzrokih za začetek spontane izmenjave podatkov v skladu z odstavkom 1.
The police services or other competent law enforcement authorities in question shall be informed of the clearly substantiated serious factual reasons for initiating the spontaneous exchange of information pursuant to paragraph 1.
Sprememba 26
Amendment 26 Article 4 b (new)
Policijske službe ali drugi pristojni organi pregona lahko zavrnejo posredovanje podatkov le, če utemeljijo, da obstajajo resni dejanski razlogi za domnevo:
The police services or the competent law enforcement authorities may refuse to provide information only if they show that there are serious factual reasons to assume that:
c) da so zahtevani podatki očitno nesorazmerni ali brezpredmetni v primerjavi z nameni, za katere se zahtevajo.
(c) the requested information is clearly disproportionate or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested.
Sprememba 27 Člen 4 c (novo)
Amendment 27 Article 4 c (new)
Člen 4 c
Article 4c
Podatki, vključno z osebnimi podatki, ki se izmenjujejo ali posredujejo morajo po tej direktivi:
Information, including personal data, exchanged or provided pursuant to this Decision must:
a) biti točni, ustrezni in koristni za namen, za katerega se zbirajo in nato obdelujejo;
(a) be accurate, appropriate and relevant to the purposes for which it is collected and subsequently processed;
Podatki o zasebnem in družinskem življenju kot tudi podatki o podrobnostih, o katerih ne obstaja sum, se lahko zbirajo le, ko je to nujno potrebno.
Data relating to aspects of private life and data relating to individuals not under suspicion may only be collected in cases of absolute necessity and subject to compliance with strict conditions.
Celovitost in zaupnost posredovanih podatkov je po tem sklepu zagotovljena v vseh fazah njihove izmenjave in obdelave.
The integrity and confidentiality of data provided pursuant to this Decision shall be guaranteed at all stages of their exchange and processing.
Sprememba 28 Člen 4 d (novo)
Amendment 28 Article 4 d (new)
a) biti obveščena o obstoju podatkov, ki jo zadevajo, razen v primeru večje ovire;
(a) be informed of the existence of the data relating to them, except where there is a major obstacle thereto;
b) imeti prost dostop do podatkov, ki jo zadevajo, in pravico, da popravi netočne podatke, razen če tak dostop škoduje javni varnosti, javnemu redu, pravicam in svoboščinam tretje strani ali če to ovira preiskave v teku;
(b) have a cost-free right of access to the data concerning them and the right to rectify inaccurate data, except where such access is likely to be prejudicial to public security or public order or to the rights and freedoms of third parties, or to hamper inquiries that are under way;
c) v primeru zlorabe podatkov po tem členu imeti pravico do pritožbe za zagotavljanje zakonitosti in po potrebi prejeti odškodnino, če se ne upoštevajo načela, ki jih vsebuje ta člen.
(c) where there is misuse of the data having regard to this Article, have a right to object cost-free with a view to redressing the legal situation and, where applicable, to obtaining compensation if the principles set out in this Article have not been adhered to.
Sprememba 29
Amendment 29 Article 4 e (new)
Ustanovi se skupni nadzorni organ, ki bo zadolžen za varstvo osebnih podatkov, v nadaljevanju 'organ'.
A joint personal data protection supervisory authority shall be set up, hereinafter referred to as the "authority".
Organ sestavljajo predstavnik nadzornega organa ali organov, ki jih imenujejo posamezne države članice, predstavnik organa ali organov institucij, evropski nadzornik za vartsvo podatkov ter organi Skupnosti in predstavnik Komisije.
The authority shall be made up of a representative of the supervisory authority or authorities designated by each Member State, a representative of the authority or authorities set up by the institutions, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Community bodies and a representative of the Commission.
Člana organa imenujejo institucija, organ ali organi, ki jih predstavlja.
Each member of the authority shall be designated by the institution, authority or authorities her or she represents.
Enak postopek velja za organe, ki so ustanovljeni za institucije, in organe Skupnosti.
The same procedure shall apply for the authorities set up for the Community institutions and bodies.
Mandat predsednika traja dve leti.
The chairman's term of office shall be two years.
Sprememba 30
Amendment 30 Article 4 f (new)
a) spremlja vsa vprašanja o izvajanju nacionalnih določb, sprejetih po tem okvirnem sklepu;
(a) to examine any matter relating to the implementation of the national provisions adopted in application of this Decision;
c) posreduje predloge vsakršnih sprememb veljavnega okvirnega sklepa, k predlogom vseh dodatnih ali posebnih sklepov za varovanje pravic in svoboščin fizičnih oseb glede varstva osebnih podatkov, kot tudi k drugim predlogom evropske zakonodaje, ki vpliva na pravice in svoboščine;
(c) to advise on any proposed change to this Decision, any proposal for additional or specific measures to safeguard the rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, and any other proposal for European legislation with implications for these rights and freedoms;
Posameznik lahko organu posreduje zahtevek glede varstva svojih pravic in svoboščin glede obdelave osebnih podatkov.
Any person may submit to the authority a request concerning the protection of his or her rights and freedoms as regards the processing of personal data.
Zadevna oseba se obvesti o ukrepih, sprejetih na njen zahtevek.
The person concerned shall be informed of the action taken on his or her request.
Sprememba 31 Člen 4 g (novo)
Amendment 31 Article 4g (new)
Člen 4 g
Article 4g
Europol in Eurojust pripravita in predstavita letni poročili za Evropski parlament in Svet.
Europol and Eurojust shall submit an annual report to the European Parliament and the Council.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam ( 2004/2198(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the protection of the financial interests of the Communities and the fight against fraud ( 2004/2198(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucij o prejšnjih letnih poročilih Komisije in Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF),
having regard to its resolutions on previous annual reports of the Commission and of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF),
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Komisije o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam ( KOM(2004)0573 ), vključno s Prilogama ( SEK(2004)1058 , SEK(2004)1059 ),
having regard to the Commission's annual report on the protection of the financial interests of the Communities and fight against fraud ( COM(2004)0573 ), including the annexes ( SEC(2004)1058 , SEC(2004)1059 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije: Varstvo finančnih interesov Skupnosti, boj proti goljufijam, akcijski načrt 2004-2005 ( KOM(2004)0544 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled 'Protecting the Communities' financial interests, Fight against Fraud, Action Plan for 2004-2005' ( COM(2004)0544 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila o dejavnosti OLAF za proračunsko leto, ki se je končalo junija 2004 http://europa.eu.int/comm/anti_fraud/reports/olaf/2003-2004/en2.pdf.
having regard to the activity report of OLAF for the year ending June 2004 http://europa.eu.int/comm/anti_fraud/reports/olaf/2003-2004/en2.pdf.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2003 UL C 293, 30.11.2004, str.
having regard to the annual report of the European Court of Auditors concerning the financial year 2003 OJ C 293, 30.11.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 276(3) in člena 280(5) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 276(3) and Article 280(5) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenj Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0151/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0151/2005 ),
ugotavlja, da so države članice v letu 2003 za področja virov lastnih sredstev, izdatkov za kmetijstvo in strukturnopolitičnih ukrepov sporočile nepravilnosti in goljufije v skupni višini okoli 922 milijonov EUR; številke, ki so jih države članice sporočile Bruslju, je mogoče razčleniti, kot sledi:
Notes that in 2003, in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure and structural actions, irregularities and cases of fraud totalling some EUR 922 million were reported by the Member States; the figures forwarded to Brussels by the Member States can be broken down as follows:
viri lastnih sredstev: 269,9 milijonov EUR (v letu 2002: 341,9 milijonov EUR),
own resources: EUR 269.9 million (2002: EUR 341.9 million),
jamstvo EKUJS: 169,7 milijonov EUR (v letu 2002: 198,1 milijonov EUR),
EAGGF Guarantee Section: EUR 169.7 million (2002: EUR 198.1 million),
strukturnopolitièni ukrepi: 482,2 milijonov EUR (v letu 2002: 614,1 milijonov EUR);
structural actions: EUR 482.2 million (2002: EUR 614.1 million);
ugotavlja, da je sporoèeni obseg celotne škode v letu 2002 v celoti znašal 1,15 milijarde EUR in je bil tako višji kot leta 2003; opozarja na to, da se takšnih nihanj v obsegih škode iz enega leta v drugega ne sme precenjevati v njihovem pomenu in da lahko na njih vplivajo številni dejavniki;
Notes that the total loss reported in 2002 was EUR 1.15 billion and was thus higher than in 2003; points out that the importance of such year-on-year fluctuations should not be overestimated and that they may be affected by a wide variety of factors;
vendar poudarja, da obseg škode, gledano v daljšem obdobju, v poroèilu EKUJS upada, medtem ko je na podroèju strukturnih skladov opazen znaten porast; tako je npr. celoten obseg škode leta 2000 na podroèju EKUJS znašal še 474,6 milijonov EUR, medtem ko je na podroèju strukturnih skladov istega leta znašal 114,3 milijonov EUR; medtem se je relativni pomen obeh podroèij v statistiki goljufij skoraj obrnil;
Notes, however, that taken over a longer period the trend in the area of the EAGGF is clearly downward, whereas in the area of the Structural Funds a substantial increase has been seen; in the year 2000, for example, the loss reported in the area of the EAGGF still totalled EUR 474.6 million, whereas the loss in the area of the Structural Funds in the same year totalled no more than EUR 114.3 million; since then, the proportions of the fraud statistics accounted for by the two areas have almost been reversed;
poziva države èlanice, da sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za izboljšanje sistemov nadzora in upravljanja strukturnih skladov ter zagotovijo obèutno zmanjšanje nevarnosti goljufij ter polno uporabo doloèb Uredbe (ES) št. 1681/94 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1681/94 z dne 11. julija 1994 o nepravilnostih in izterjavi nepravilno plačanih zneskov v okviru financiranja strukturnih politik ter organizaciji ustreznega informacijskega sistema na tem področju (UL L 178, 12.7.1994, str.
Invites the Member States to take appropriate measures to improve systems for the control and management of the structural funds and to ensure both that the risk of fraud is reduced significantly and that the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1681/94 of 11 July 1994 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the structural policies and the organization of an information system in this field (OJ L 178, 12.7.1994, p.
, posebno v zvezi s postopkom za pravoèasno, razumljivo in izèrpno obvešèanje;
are applied fully, particularly with regard to the procedure for timely, clear and full notification;
ugotavlja, da je OLAF v obdobju poroèanja zabeležil 637 novih primerov, finanèni uèinek vseh primerov, ki so bili 30. junija 2004 še predmet tekoèih preiskav, pa je bil ocenjen na 1,37 milijarde EUR;
Notes that during the period covered by the report OLAF registered 637 new cases and that the financial impact of all cases still under investigation on 30 June 2004 was put at EUR 1.37 billion;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da je višina škode vseh primerov, za katere je OLAF konec obdobja poroèanja (julij 2003-junij 2004) uvedel nadaljnje ukrepe, znašala 1,76 milijarde EUR Finančna izguba vseh primerov, ki sta jih raziskala OLAF in njegova predhodna organizacija, je ocenjena na 5,34 milijard EUR (glej SEK(2004)1370 , Priloga II).
Notes, further, that the loss to the budget resulting from all cases in respect of which OLAF had initiated follow-up measures at the end of the period covered by its report (July 2003-June 2004) totalled EUR 1.76 billion The financial loss resulting from all the cases investigated by OLAF and its forerunner organisation is estimated at EUR 5.34 billion (see SEC(2004)1370 , Annex II).
ugotavlja, da je ob koncu obdobja poroèanja OLAF v novih državah èlanicah in državah pristopnicah potekalo 55 preiskav; te preiskave potekajo predvsem na podroèjih zunanje pomoèi, cigaret in kmetijstva; v zvezi s tem poudarja koristnost Koordinacijske službe za boj proti goljufijam;
Notes that at the end of the period covered by the OLAF report 55 investigations were under way in the new Member States and accession countries; most of those investigations were concentrated in the external aid, cigarette and agriculture sectors; emphasises, in that connection, the valuable role played by the Anti-Fraud Coordination Service;
obžaluje, da poročila, ki sta jih predložila Komisija in OLAF niso bila dovolj primerljiva in pozdravlja namen, da se poenoti obdobja poročanja;
Regrets the fact that the reports submitted by the Commission and OLAF have hitherto not been sufficiently comparable and welcomes the intention to harmonise the reporting periods;
poziva k poenostavitvi opredelitev vrst goljufij in metod odkrivanja; zato poziva Komisijo in OLAF da se dogovorita o delitvi dela na področju kmetijstva, vsled česar bo OLAF v prihodnosti odgovoren za preiskave med tem ko bo GD AGRI odgovoren za izterjave;
Argues in favour of simplifying definitions of types of fraud and methods of detection; calls on the Commission and OLAF to agree on a division of labour in the agricultural sector, following which OLAF will, in future, be responsible for investigations, whereas DG AGRI will be responsible for recoveries;
prav tako opozarja na posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 3/2004 o izterjavi nezakonitih plačil v okviru skupne kmetijske politike UL C 269, 4.11.2004, str.
Draws attention, further, to the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy OJ C 269, 4.11.2004, p.
: iz poročila izhaja, da je bilo med letom 1971 in septembrom 2004 za ta sektor sporočenih nepravilnosti v višini 3,1 milijard EUR; 626 milijonov EUR (20,2 %) je bilo izterjanih od prejemnikov sredstev, 156 milijonov EUR (5 %) je moral plačati EKUJS, 144 milijonov EUR (4,6 %) pa države članice; tako je treba izterjati še 2,2 milijarde EUR (70 %);
: according to that report, between 1971 and September 2004 irregularities involving a total of EUR 3.1 billion were reported in the sector; of that sum, EUR 626 million (20.2%) has been recovered from recipients and EUR 156 million (5%) and EUR 144 million (4.6%) has had to be paid by the EAGGF and the Member States respectively; accordingly, there should still be EUR 2.2 billion (70%) to be recovered;
poudarja osnovno odgovornost držav članic za hitro in učinkovito izterjavo izgubljenih proračunskih sredstev; obžaluje, da države članice te odgovornosti niso dovolj upoštevale in da so zlasti svoje obveznosti do Komisije izpolnjevale precej pomanjkljivo;
Emphasises that the Member States bear primary responsibility for the prompt and efficient recovery of lost budget appropriations; regrets the fact that hitherto the Member States have failed to discharge this responsibility adequately and, in particular, have been sloppy in carrying out their reporting duties vis-à-vis the Commission;
pozdravlja delo delovne skupine "Izterjava" za obdelavo terjatve na področju kmetijstva, ki je morala do marca 2005 obdelati okoli 4000 primerov; v zvezi s tem je hvaležen za posebno poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 3/2004 o izterjavi nezakonitih plačil v okviru skupne kmetijske politike;
Welcomes the work of the 'Recovery' Task Force set up to deal with sums outstanding in the agricultural sector, which is due to settle some 4000 cases by March 2005; in that connection, welcomes the European Court of Auditors' Special Report No 3/2004 on recovery of irregular payments under the Common Agricultural Policy;
pozdravlja napredek, ki ga je medtem dosegla delovna skupina "Izterjava"; tako je bilo ugotovljeno, da je od 2,18 milijarde EUR s tekočimi sodnimi postopki blokiranih 812 milijonov EUR, 247 milijonov EUR pa države članice obravnavajo kot neizterljive (npr. zaradi stečaja); ti zneski pomenijo, da je treba v tem trenutku izterjati 1,12 milijarde EUR;
Welcomes the progress made in the meantime by the 'Recovery' Task Force; for example, it has established that, of the total of EUR 2.18 billion, EUR 812 million is blocked as a result of ongoing legal proceedings and EUR 247 million is regarded by the Member States as irrecoverable (e.g. as a result of bankruptcies); these figures imply that, as things stand, a sum of EUR 1.12 billion needs to be recovered;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je mogoče z natančnim pregledom posameznih primerov znesek, ki ga je treba izterjati, zmanjšati z 1,12 milijarde EUR na 765 milijonov EUR (npr. preprečitev podvajanj poročil);
Welcomes the fact that detailed consideration of individual cases has further reduced the sum to be recovered from EUR 1.12 billion to EUR 765 million (e.g. by avoiding the duplication of reports);
ugotavlja, da je treba v skladu z analizo delovne skupine od omenjenih 765 milijonov EUR 115 milijonov EUR izterjati od EKUJS, v primerjavi s 650 milijonov EUR od držav članic; države članice so bile o tem že pisno obveščene;
Notes that, on the basis of the analysis drawn up by the Task Force, of the stated figure of EUR 765 million, EUR 115 million should be recovered from the EAGGF, as against EUR 650 million from the Member States; the Member States have already been informed of this state of affairs by letter;
kritizira dejstvo, da imajo ravno države, katerih sporočene nepravilnosti predstavljajo največjo izgubo za proračun (2003: Španija 112 367 457 EUR, Italija 16 896 556 EUR in Francija 12 221 826 EUR), tudi najnižjo stopnjo izterjave (2003: Španija 4,9 %, Italija 13,9 % in Francija 15,6 %); pri izvoznih nadomestilih je Španija odgovorna za skoraj 50 % celotne izgube (2003: 8 694 350 EUR od celotnih 17 514 557 EUR), izterjala pa je le 9,3 %;
Criticises the fact that it is often those countries whose reported irregularities represent the greatest loss to the budget (2003: Spain EUR 112 367 457, Italy EUR 16 896 556, and France EUR 12 221 826) which also have the lowest recovery rates (2003: Spain 4.9%, Italy 13.9%, and France 15.6%); in the case of export refunds, Spain accounted for almost 50% of the total loss (2003: EUR 8 694 350 out of a total of EUR 17 514 557), but recovered only 9.3%;
upa, da bo delovna skupina, ki je bila osnovana leta 2003 in naj bi preučila primere, ki izhajajo iz časa pred letom 1999, prispevala k zmanjševanju zaostankov;
Hopes that the task force set up in 2003 to examine pre-1999 cases will make it possible to recover a proportion of the arrears;
ponovno opozarja na sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti Glej odstavek 22 njegove resolucije z dne 30. marca 2004 o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in letno poročilo o boju proti goljufijam 2002 (UL C 103 E, 29.4.2004, str.
Draws attention, once again, to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities See paragraph 22 of Parliament's resolution of 30 March 2004 on the protection of the financial interests of the Communities and fight against fraud - Annual report 2002 (OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p.
, ki je že v svoji sodbi z dne 11. oktobra 1990 (primer C-34/89, Italijanska republika proti Komisiji) ECR 1990, I-3603.
, which, in a judgment delivered as long ago as 11 October 1990 (Case C-34/89, Italian Republic v Commission) ECR 1990, I-3603.
opomnilo države članice, naj upoštevajo splošno dolžnost skrbnega ravnanja;
, warned the Member States to observe their general duty of care;