natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
7. obsoja nasilje, kršenje človekovih pravic in zlorabe v Kivuju, zlasti spolno nasilje in novačenje otrok vojakov, ki ga izvaja milica, ter poudarja, da je treba vse storilce privesti pred sodišče;
Condemns the acts of violence, human rights violations and abuses committed in Kivu, in particular sexual violence and the recruitment by the militia of child soldiers, and stresses the importance of bringing all perpetrators to justice;
9. priporoča, da vlada Demokratične republike Kongo spodbuja varnost in preglednost zalog orožja in municije ter njihovo upravljanje kot nujno prednostno nalogo in izvaja nacionalni program za označevanje orožja v skladu s standardi protokola iz Nairobija in regionalnega centra za osebno in lahko orožje;
Recommends that the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo promote stockpile security, accountability and management of arms and ammunition as an urgent priority, and that it implement a national weapons marking programme in line with the standards established by the Nairobi Protocol and the Regional Centre on Small Arms;
11. ponovno poudarja potrebo po hitrem ukrepanju, da bi preprečili novo humanitarno katastrofo v vzhodni kongovski provinci Kivu, kamor se je zateklo na stotine tisoče novih beguncev in kjer vedno več ljudi umira zaradi vojne ter širjenja bolezni;
Reaffirms that swift reaction is necessary to prevent a new humanitarian catastrophe in the eastern Congolese province of Kivu, with hundreds of thousands of additional refugees and rising numbers of people dying from war and spreading diseases;
13. ugotavlja, da je bilo zaradi bojev veliko prebivalcev regije razseljenih znotraj lastne države in poziva vpletene države, naj sodelujejo s humanitarnimi organizacijami, da bi zmanjšale trpljenje ljudi;
Notes that a large number of the inhabitants of the region have been displaced within their own country because of the fighting, and calls on the countries concerned to cooperate with humanitarian organisations to reduce people's suffering;
9.12.2009 B7-0191/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B7‑0230/2009 in B7‑0231/2009
9.12.2009 B7-0191/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Questions for Oral Answer B7‑0230/2009 and B7‑0231/2009
o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001
on improvements needed to the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Regulation (EC) 1049/2001
PE432.812v01-00 B7‑0191/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001
PE432.812v01-00 B7‑0191/2009 European Parliament resolution on improvements needed to the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Regulation (EC) 1049/2001
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, Listine Unije o temeljnih pravicah ter njihovih določb, ki so začele veljati 1. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the articles thereof which entered into force on 1 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj Komisiji in Svetu z dne 9. novembra 2009 o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 ( O–0123/2009 – B7–0231/2009 , O–0122/2009 – B7–0230/2009 ), ter razprave na plenarnem zasedanju,
– having regard to the questions of 9 November 2009 to the Commission and Council on the improvement needed in the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 ( O-0123/2009 – B7‑0231/2009 , O-0122/2009 – B7‑0230/2009 ) and to the debate in plenary,
A. ker Unija „posameznika postavlja v središče svojih dejavnosti z vzpostavitvijo državljanstva Unije in oblikovanjem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice“ (preambula Listine o temeljnih pravicah) in ker ima „vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic [...] pravico dostopa do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije, ne glede na nosilec dokumenta“ (člen 42 Listine o temeljnih pravicah),
A. whereas the Union 'places the individual at the heart of its activities, by establishing the citizenship of the Union and by creating an area of freedom, security and justice' (Preamble to the Charter of Fundamental Rights) and 'any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium' (Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights),
B. ker Lizbonska pogodba spreminja pravno podlago Uredbe o dostopu do dokumentov, hkrati pa tudi pravni okvir, v katerem se bo uredba uporabljala, zlasti kar zadeva odnos med institucijami Unije in njenimi državljani Mnenje pravne službe EP z dne 10. oktobra 2009, odstavek 3.
B. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has modified not only the legal basis for the Regulation governing access to documents, but also the legal context in which the Regulation is to operate, in particular as regards the relationship between the Union institutions and the citizen EP Legal Service opinion of 10 October 2009, paragraph 3.
C. ker bi moral ta odnos odslej temeljiti na demokratičnih načelih, očrtanih v novem naslovu II Pogodbe EU, kjer je navedeno, da „Unija [...] spoštuje načelo enakosti svojih državljanov, ki so deležni enake obravnave s strani njenih institucij“ (člen 9), ter da ima „vsak državljan [...] pravico sodelovati v demokratičnem življenju Unije.
C. whereas this relationship should from now on be framed by the democratic principles outlined in the new Title II of the TEU, according to which 'the Union shall observe the principle of equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions' (Article 9) and 'every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union.
Odločitve se sprejemajo kar najbolj odprto in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani.“ (člen 10(3)),
Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen' (Article 10(3)),
D. ker je gonilo popolne integracije Evropske skupnosti v Evropsko unijo ter odprave medvladne ureditve, ki je vse doslej veljala na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, pripravljenost držav članic „okrepiti demokratično in učinkovito delovanje institucij“,
D. whereas the full integration of the European Community into the EU, as well as the abolition of the intergovernmental regime which still applied to judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters, was driven by the Member States' willingness 'to enhance further the democratic and efficient functioning of the institutions',
E. ker bi morale vse institucije, organi, uradi in agencije EU, in ne le Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija (ki jih že zavezuje člen 255 predhodne Pogodbe ES), v skladu s tem novim pravnim okvirom odslej „pri svojem delu kar najbolj upoštevati načelo javnosti delovanja“ (člen 15(1) Pogodbe o delovanju EU),
E. whereas, in keeping with this new legal framework, all the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and not only the European Parliament, the Council or the Commission (which were already bound by Article 255 of the former EC Treaty) should now conduct their work as openly as possible (Article 15(1) of the TFEU),
F. ker sta v skladu z novo Pogodbo EU in sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije Kot je zapisano v sodbi v zadevi „Turco“ (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P), pomeni preglednost tesnejše sodelovanje državljanov v postopku odločanja in večjo zakonitost v upravi ter njeno učinkovitejše in odgovornejše ravnanje v razmerju do državljanov v demokratičnem sistemu.
F. whereas according to the new TEU and the case law of the Court of Justice As stated by the ECJ in the 'Turco' Judgment (joined cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P), 'openness (…) enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system'.
javnost delovanja in udeležba civilne družbe nujna pogoja za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja institucij EU ter posledično „učinkovitosti postopka odločanja“,
, openness and participation of civil society are essential conditions to promote good governance of the EU institutions and with it 'the effectiveness of the decision-making process',
G. ker imajo državljani v skladu s temeljnimi načeli demokracije pravico poznati in spremljati postopek odločanja, ter ker bi morale institucije EU in predstavniki držav članic, kadar nastopajo kot člani Sveta pred zakonodajnim in nezakonodajnim postopkom odločanja, med njim in po njem, zagotoviti večjo preglednost, da bi državljanom EU in nacionalnim parlamentom omogočili celostno razumevanje, kdo kaj počne in zakaj, ter spremljanje dejavnosti svojih predstavnikov,
G. whereas in accordance with the basic principles of democracy citizens have a right to know and to follow the decision-making process and that enhanced transparency should be guaranteed by the EU Institutions and the Member States' representatives when acting as members of the Council before, during and after the legislative and non-legislative decision-making process in order to allow EU citizens and national parliaments to have a comprehensive understanding of who is doing what and why and to monitor the activities of their representatives,
H. ker institucije EU „dajejo državljanom in predstavniškim združenjem [...] možnost izražanja in javne izmenjave mnenj glede vseh področij delovanja Unije“ ter „vzdržujejo odprt, pregleden in reden dialog s predstavniškimi združenji in civilno družbo“ (člen 11(1) in (2) Pogodbe EU),
H. whereas EU Institutions 'shall give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action' and 'shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society' (Article 11(1) and (2) of the TEU),
I. ker Lizbonska pogodba zahteva nadaljnje izboljšave v preglednosti in javnem dostopu do dokumentov in ker so s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije že razjasnjene nekatere določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki jih je tako treba sedaj razlagati v smeri lažjega dostopa, kakor jih je razlagal tudi Parlament, ko je bila omenjena uredba sprejeta; ker Parlament ne bo sprejel nobenih zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije ali Sveta o zmanjšanju dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ali o krnjenju pravice državljanov do informiranosti,
I. whereas the Lisbon Treaty calls for further improvements to transparency and public access to documents and whereas the case law of the Court of Justice has already been most helpful in clarifying some of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, so that these must now be interpreted in line with the access-friendly understanding of these provisions espoused by Parliament when the Regulation was adopted; whereas Parliament will not allow any legislative attempts by the Commission or the Council to decrease public access to documents or roll back citizens' right to information,
J. ker bi morali biti načeli javnosti in preglednosti delovanja vodilni načeli ne le v postopku odločanja, temveč tudi pri načinu priprave besedila in vključevanja vseh potrebnih informacij za izpolnjevanje načel sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti, kar je v interesu državljanov EU in nacionalnih parlamentov, in ker bi to moralo veljati tudi za sodstvo; ker bi bilo treba zagotoviti preglednost in dostop do dokumentov tudi v zvezi z izvajanjem politik EU na vseh ravneh in v zvezi s porabo sredstev EU,
J. whereas openness and transparency principles should govern not only the decision-making process but also the way in which a text is drafted and accompanied by all the information needed to meet the criteria of proportionality and subsidiarity, in the interests of EU citizens and national parliaments, and whereas this should also be the case for the judiciary; whereas transparency and access to documents should also be guaranteed in relation to how EU policies are implemented at all levels and how EU funds are used,
K. ker je Sodišče Evropske unije potrdilo, da preglednost in dostop do informacij omogočata „javno razpravo o razhajanjih med različnimi mnenji ter daje institucijam večjo legitimnost v očeh evropskih državljanov in povečuje njihovo zaupanje.
K. whereas the Court of Justice has confirmed that openness and access to information 'contribute to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of European citizens and increasing their confidence in them by allowing divergences between various points of view to be openly debated.
Pomanjkanje informacij in razprav lahko namreč pri državljanih vzbudi dvome o zakonitosti posameznega akta in legitimnosti celotnega postopka odločanja“ (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, odstavek 59),
It is in fact rather a lack of information and debate which is capable of giving rise to doubts in the minds of citizens, not only as regards the lawfulness of an isolated act, but also as regards the legitimacy of the decision-making process as a whole' (Joined Cases C-39/05 and C-52/05, Paragraph 59),
L. ker bi bilo treba sprejeti dolgo pričakovane pravne, finančne in operativne ukrepe, da bi zagotovili jasen in pravočasen dostop do vseh dokumentov, povezanih s posameznim zakonodajnim postopkom, najsi pripadajo notranjim službam ali zunanjim interesnim skupinam, dostop do teh informacij pa bi bilo treba omogočiti na medinstitucionalnem spletnem mestu z medsebojnimi povezavami notranjih baz podatkov institucij (kot je nedavno prenovljeno spletno mesto EUR-LEX, ki ga upravlja OPOCE); ker bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti notranje predpise, kmalu pa bi bilo treba skleniti zavezujoče medinstitucionalne sporazume na podlagi člena 295 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
L. whereas long-awaited legal, financial and operational measures should be taken in order to make accessible, in a clear and timely manner, all the relevant documents relating to a specific legislative procedure, whether originating from internal departments or from outside interest groups, and this information should be made available on an inter-institutional Internet site interconnecting the Institutions' internal databases (such as OPOCE's newly improved EUR-LEX site); whereas internal regulations should be amended accordingly and binding interinstitutional agreements should soon be negotiated on the basis of Article 295 of the TFEU,
M. ker nove odgovornosti Evropske unije, zlasti Evropskega parlamenta, na področjih, kot so mednarodni sporazumi o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah, zahtevajo revizijo pravnega okvira v zvezi s členoma 4 in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, pri čemer mora imeti Evropski parlament kot predstavnik evropskih državljanov popoln nadzor,
M. whereas the new responsibilities of the European Union, and notably of the European Parliament, in fields such as international agreements concerning police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, require a revised legal framework in relation to Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, including full oversight by the European Parliament as the representative of Europe's citizens,
(a) razširiti njeno področje uporabe, da bo zajela vse institucije, organe, urade in agencije EU, ki še niso zajete, kot so Evropski svet, Evropska centralna banka, Sodišče Evropske unije, Europol in Eurojust;
(a) widening its scope to cover all EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies currently not covered, such as the European Council, the ECB, the ECJ, Europol and Eurojust;
(b) spremeniti določbe, ki se nanašajo na zakonodajne in nezakonodajne postopke, na podlagi novih opredelitev v pogodbah;
(b) amending the provisions dealing with legislative and non-legislative procedures on the basis of the new definitions contained in the Treaties;
(c) na podlagi nedavne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije posodobiti pravila, ki urejajo ravnanje z notranjimi dokumenti, informacijami in podatki, da bi zagotovili širši dostop do mnenj pravnih služb, podanih v okviru postopka odločanja, dokumenti in informacijami, ki se nanašajo na države članice v vlogi članic Sveta – vključno z vloženimi zakoni, predlogi in spremembami, zapisniki njihovih sej, njihovimi stališči in glasovanji v Svetu, tudi v delovnih skupinah in strokovnih skupinah – , varstvom osebnih podatkov in tržnih interesov, vsebino baz podatkov institucij itd.;
(c) updating, on the basis of the recent case law of the ECJ, the rules dealing notably with the treatment of internal documents, information and data, to ensure wider access to Legal Service opinions drafted in the framework of the decision-making process, documents and information relating to Member States when acting as members of the Council - including the acts, proposals and amendments tabled, transcripts of its meetings, their positions and votes cast in the Council, including in its working groups and expert groups - the protection of personal data and commercial interests, the content of the institutions' databases, etc.;
(d) odobriti zadosten dostop do razpoložljivih informacij v institucijah EU, ki bo omogočil objektivno oceno izvajanja pravil, zakonov, ukrepov in programov EU v državah članicah; zagotoviti večjo finančno preglednost v zvezi s podrobnimi informacijami o proračunu EU, njegovem izvajanju ter upravičencev do skladov in subvencij EU;
(d) granting adequate access to the information available in the EU institutions which will enable an objective evaluation of the implementation of EU rules, acts, measures and programmes in the Member States; ensuring that greater financial transparency is granted in relation to detailed information concerning the EU budget, its implementation and beneficiaries of EU funds and grants;
(e) s preglednim postopkom ter ob doslednem upoštevanju načel demokracije in pravne države ter javnega in zasebnega interesa določiti splošna načela in omejitve v zvezi z dostopom do tajnih dokumentov z oznako „strogo tajno“, „tajno“ ali „zaupno“ („Top Secret“, „Secret“ ali „Confidential“), da bi zaščitili najpomembnejše interese EU (zlasti javno varnost, obrambo in vojaške zadeve);
(e) establishing, in a transparent procedure and in full compliance with the principles of democracy and the rule of law, the general principles and restrictions on grounds of public or private interest limiting access to documents to be classified as 'Top Secret', 'Secret' or 'Confidential' in order to protect the EU's essential interests (in particular public security, defence and military matters);
2. obžaluje, da kljub jasnim pozivom z dne 11. marca 2009:
Deplores the fact that, in spite of the clear requests it made on 11 March 2009:
– Komisija ni pripravila spremenjene različice svojega zakonodajnega predloga KOM(2008)0090 in je 2. decembra 2009, dan po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, odobrila sporočilo ( KOM(2009)0665 ), s katerim je zgolj posodobila pravno podlago prvotnega predloga brez vsebinskih sprememb;
- the Commission did not prepare a modified version of its legislative proposal COM(2008)0090 and, on 2 December 2009, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, approved a communication ( COM(2009)0665 ) which updated only the legal basis of the original proposal, avoiding any modification of its content;
3. poziva sedanje in prihodnje predsedstvo Sveta, naj nemudoma začne medinstitucionalni dialog na politični ravni z namenom kar najhitreje pripraviti novo ureditev v zvezi z dostopom do dokumentov;
Calls on the current and the incoming Council Presidency to launch an immediate interinstitutional dialogue at political level with a view to drawing up the new regulation governing access to documents as soon as possible;
9.12.2009 B7-0192/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0232/2009
9.12.2009 B7-0192/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0232/2009
o možnostih za razvojno agendo iz Dohe po sedmi ministrski konferenci STO
on the prospects for the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) following the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference
PE432.813v01-00 B7‑0192/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o možnostih za razvojno agendo iz Dohe po sedmi ministrski konferenci STO
PE432.813v01-00 B7‑0192/2009 European Parliament resolution on the prospects for the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) following the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference
– ob upoštevanju Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini (sporazuma GATT - General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade), poglavja IV, členov 36 (načela in cilji) in 37 (zaveze);
– having regard to the GATT Agreement, Chapter IV, Articles 36 (Principles and Objectives) and 37 (Commitments),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka načrta (ali „načina izvršitve“) končnega dogovora o trgovini s kmetijskimi in nekmetijskimi proizvodi iz leta 2008,
– having regard to the 2008 draft blueprints (or ‘modalities’) for a final deal on agricultural and non-agricultural trade,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov sedme ministrske konference STO z dne 2. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the Conclusions of the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference of 2 December 2009,
A. ker je bil krog pogajanj iz Dohe sprožen leta 2001, da bi se ustvarile nove priložnosti za trgovino, okrepila pravila za večstransko trgovino, obravnavala obstoječa neravnovesja v trgovinskem sistemu in da bi se trgovina postavila v službo trajnostnega razvoja, s poudarkom na gospodarski vključitvi držav v razvoju, zlasti najmanj razvitih držav, kar izvira iz prepričanja, da večstranski sistem, temelječ na pravičnejših in enakopravnejših pravilih, lahko prispeva k pravični in prosti trgovini, ki bo prispevala k razvoju vseh kontinentov,
A. whereas the Doha Round was launched in 2001 with the objectives of creating new trading opportunities, strengthening multilateral trade rules, addressing current imbalances in the trading system and putting trade at the service of sustainable development, with an emphasis on the economic integration of developing countries, especially the least developed countries (LDCs), arising from the conviction that a multilateral system, based on more just and equitable rules, can contribute to fair and free trade at the service of the development of all continents,
B. ker deklaracija iz Dohe ponovno potrjuje zavezo k posebni in drugačni obravnavi držav v razvoju, s čemer se upošteva njihov neenak položaj,
B. whereas the Doha Declaration reaffirms its commitment to special and differential treatment for developing countries to take account of their unequal situation,
C. ker so pogovori na ministrski ravni v okviru STO za zaključek pogajanj iz Dohe zastali konec julija 2008,
C. whereas the WTO Ministerial Talks to close the Doha Round stalled at the end of July 2008,
D. ker je mednarodna gospodarska kriza še zlasti globoko prizadela mednarodno trgovino, saj trgovinski tokovi upadajo še znatneje kot svetovna proizvodnja,
D. whereas international trade has been particularly deeply affected by the economic crisis, with trade flows decreasing even more significantly than global output,
E. ker je sedma ministrska konferenca STO, ki se je odvijala v Ženevi od 30. novembra do 2. decembra 2009, poudarila pomembnost trgovine in kroga pogajanj iz Dohe za gospodarsko okrevanje in zmanjševanje revščine v državah v razvoju,
E. whereas the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference, which took place in Geneva from 30 November to 2 December 2009, underlined the great importance of trade and the Doha Round for economic recovery and poverty alleviation in developing countries,
F. ker je bilo ime Evropska unija prvič po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe uporabljeno v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji 1. decembra 2009 na delovni seji sedme ministrske konferenci,
F. whereas the name ‘European Union’ was used for the first time in the WTO in the 1 December 2009 working session at the Seventh Ministerial Conference, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon,