natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva države članice, naj v javnem izobraževanju izvajajo programe za osveščanje o dejavnikih tveganja, povezanih z boleznimi srca in ožilja, ter specializirane programe za nadaljnje izobraževanje zdravstvenih delavcev;
Calls on Member States to implement public education programmes to raise awareness of the risk factors relating to cardiovascular disease and specialist programmes for the further education of health professionals;
poziva države članice, naj ugotovijo, koliko so bolezni srca in ožilja razširjene med njihovim prebivalstvom, in ocenijo svoje nacionalne programe, da bi določile mejne vrednosti, s pomočjo katerih lahko nacionalni zdravstveni organi zastavijo oprijemljive cilje pri izvajanju temu namenjenih dejavnosti;
Calls on the Member States to measure the prevalence of cardiovascular disease among their population and evaluate their national programmes to identify benchmark figures that will enable national health authorities to set tangible goals when implementing dedicated initiatives;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj spodbujajo izvajanje najnovejših evropskih smernic za preprečevanje bolezni srca in ožilja, ki jih je pripravila skupna evropska delovna skupina;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to support the implementation of the most recent European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention produced by the Joint European Task Force;
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja pobude in sodelovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki spodbujajo boljše zdravje srca in ožilja z ukrepi, namenjenimi preprečevanju debelosti in visokega krvnega pritiska ter z njima povezanih zapletov, med katere sodijo nadaljnji nadzor nad tobakom, alkoholom ter boljše prehranjevanje in večja telesna dejavnost;
Calls on the Commission to encourage initiatives and collaborations with interested stakeholders who aim to promote better cardiovascular health through further controls on tobacco and alcohol and improved diet and physical activity as a means of preventing obesity and high blood pressure and their related complications;
poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja svoje prejšnje pobude za izmenjavo najboljših praks pri preprečevanju bolezni srca in ožilja med državami članicami;
Urges the Commission to follow up on its earlier initiatives on exchange of best practice of cardiovascular disease prevention between Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja redno izmenjavo izkušenj, informacij in podatkov o zdravju srca in ožilja med vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, ki so vključene v preprečevanje bolezni srca in ožilja;
Calls on the Commission to promote regular exchange of experience, information and data on cardiovascular health between all stakeholders involved in cardiovascular disease prevention;
poziva Komisijo, naj poveča primerljivost podatkov, s tem da spodbudi vzpostavitev baze podatkov za spremljanje razširjenosti bolezni srca in ožilja, umrljivosti, obolevnosti in dejavnikov tveganja v državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to increase the comparability of data by fostering the establishment of a database monitoring cardiovascular disease prevalence, mortality, morbidity and risk factors across Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi presoje vpliva na zdravje, s katerimi bo izmerila, kolikšno je breme bolezni srca in ožilja ter visokega krvnega pritiska na evropsko gospodarko produktivnost v vseh državah članicah, glede na sklepe Sveta o zdravju v vseh politikah;
Urges the Commission to develop health impact assessments to measure the burden of cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure on European economic productivity across Member States, further to the Council’s conclusions on Health in all Policies;
pozdravlja načrt za razvoj zdravstvene strategije, ki ga je Komisija napovedala pred kratkim, ter poziva Komisijo, naj v njem izpostavi, da je potreben pravičen dostop do preprečevanja, zdravljenja, diagnosticiranja in spremljanja bolezni za vse Evropejce, ne glede na nacionalnost;
Welcomes the Commission’s recently announced plan to develop a Health Strategy and urges the Commission, in this plan, to focus on the need for equity of access to prevention, treatment, diagnosis and control of disease for all Europeans regardless of nationality;
poziva Komisijo, naj države članice opozori na možnosti financiranja, ki obstajajo v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave, strukturnih skladov in Evropskega razvojnega sklada, za bolezni srca in ožilja, metode za odkrivanje in preprečevanje visokega krvnega pritiska ter za nadaljnje raziskave bolezni srca in ožilja;
Calls on the Commission to point out to Member States the funding opportunities available for cardiovascular disease and high blood pressure screening and prevention methods as well as for further research into cardiovascular disease such as through the 7 th Research Framework Programme, Structural Funds and the European Development Fund;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member State parliaments.
k izjavi Komisije
to wind up the debate on statements by the Commission
o sporazumu PNR z Združenimi državami Amerike
on the PNR agreement with the United States
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu PNR z Združenimi državami Amerike
European Parliament resolution on the PNR agreement with the United States
ob upoštevanju člena 6 PEU in člena 8 Listine o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to Article 6 TEU and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
ob upoštevanju resolucij o PNR z dne 7. septembra 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0354 ) in z dne 14. februarja 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0039 ),
having regard to its resolutions on PNR of 7 September 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0354 ) and of 14 February 2007 ( P6_TA(2007)0039 ),
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih sporazumov o PNR med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi državami Amerike z dne 28. maja 2004 in med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike z dne 19. oktobra 2006,
having regard to the previous PNR agreements between the European Community and the United States of America of 28 May 2004 and between the European Union and the United States of America of 19 October 2006,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/82/ES o obveznosti prevoznikov, da sporočajo podatke o potnikih,
having regard to Directive 2004/82/EC on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data,
ker je namen sporazuma PNR na eni strani zagotoviti pravno podlago za prenos podatkov PNR iz EU v ZDA, na drugi strani pa ponuditi ustrezno zaščito osebnih podatkov in opredeliti postopkovne zaščitne ukrepe za evropske državljane;
whereas the declared purpose of the PNR agreement is to provide a legal basis for the transfer of EU PNR data to the US on the one hand, and to ensure an adequate protection of personal data and procedural safeguards for European citizens on the other,
ker sporazum PNR ne izpolnjuje tega drugega cilja, saj vsebuje znatne pomanjkljivosti glede pravne varnosti, varovanja podatkov in pravnih sredstev za državljane EU, zlasti zaradi splošnih in nejasnih opredelitev ter številnih možnih izjem;
whereas the PNR agreement fails to meet the second objective, as it is substantively flawed as regards legal certainty, data protection and legal redress for EU citizens, in particular by open and vague definitions and multiple possibilities for exceptions,
ker je posredovanje podatkov in informacij možno le ob ustrezni zaščiti zasebnosti in državljanskih svoboščin posameznih državljanov ter ob nadzoru nad kakovostjo podatkov, saj bomo le na ta način pridobili dragoceno in zanesljivo sredstvo v boju proti terorizmu;
whereas adequate protection of the privacy and civil liberties of individual citizens and data quality controls are necessary if the sharing of data and information is to be a valuable and reliable tool in the fight against terrorism,
globoko obžaluje dejstvo, da ni demokratičnega nadzora, saj je bil sporazum PNR, ki je nastal na zahtevo ZDA, sklenjen brez vsakršnega sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta in ker so tudi nacionalni parlamenti imeli le malo možnosti za vpliv na pogajalski mandat in za temeljito oceno predlaganega sporazuma, niti niso mogli predlagati sprememb;
Strongly regrets the lack of democratic oversight of any kind, the PNR agreement, prompted by US requirements, having been negotiated and agreed without any involvement of the European Parliament and leaving insufficient opportunity for national parliaments to exercise any influence over the negotiating mandate, to thoroughly assess the proposed agreement, or to propose modifications to it;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad še vedno pomanjkljivo pravno varnostjo glede posledic in obsega obveznosti, ki veljajo za letalske prevoznike, ter nad pravnim razmerjem med sporazumom PNR in pismom DHS;
Is concerned at the persistent lack of legal certainty as regards the consequences and scope of the obligations imposed on the airlines as well as the legal relationship between the PNR agreement and the DHS letter;
izraža kritiko nad tem, da sporazum PNR ne nudi ustrezne ravni zaščite podatkov PNR, in obžaluje, da ni jasnih in sorazmernih določb o posredovanju informacij, njihovi hrambi in nadzoru nad njimi s strani organov za varstvo podatkov; zaskrbljen je nad dejstvom, da lahko ameriško ministrstvo za domovinsko varnost številne določbe izvaja poljubno;
Criticises the failure of the PNR agreement to offer an adequate level of protection of PNR data, and regrets the lack of clear and proportionate provisions as regards the sharing of information and retention and supervision by data protection authorities; is concerned about the numerous provisions that are to be implemented at the discretion of the DHS;
Glede pravnega okvira
As regards the legal framework
je zaskrbljen, ker ravnanje, zbiranje, uporaba in shranjevanje podatkov PNR v DHS ne temelji na posebnem sporazumu, ampak zgolj na nezavezujočih zagotovilih, ki jih ameriško ministrstvo lahko kadar koli enostransko spremeni in ki ne vsebujejo nobenih pravic ali koristi za katerega koli posameznika ali stranko;
Is concerned that the DHS's handling, collection, use and storage of PNR data is not founded on a proper agreement, but only on non-binding assurances that can be unilaterally changed by the DHS at any given moment and that do not convey any rights or benefits on any person or party;
obžaluje, da pismo ameriškega ministrstva ne vsebuje jasno izraženega namena, pač pa navaja, da se podatki PNR lahko uporabijo za boj proti terorizmu in podobna kazniva dejanja, kot tudi za številne druge, neopredeljene namene, denimo „za zaščito bistvenih interesov posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, ali drugih oseb, ali v katerem koli kazenskem postopku, oziroma v drugem zakonsko določenem primeru“;
Regrets the lack of clear purpose limitation given in the DHS letter, which notes that the PNR data may be used for the fight against terrorism and related crimes, but also for a range of unspecified additional purposes, notably 'for the protection of the vital interests of the data subject or other persons, or in any criminal judicial proceedings, or as otherwise required by law';
pozdravlja pripravljenost DHS, da načeloma najkasneje 1. januarja 2008 začne uporabljati sistem PUSH, čeprav obžaluje, da se je zamenjava – predvidena že v sporazumu PNR iz leta 2004 – zavlekla za več let in to ne glede na dejstvo, da so bili tehnični pogoji že zdavnaj izpolnjeni; meni, da bi moral biti sistem PUSH za vse prevoznike sine qua non pri katerem koli prenosu PNR; poudarja, da bi lahko sočasni obstoj sistemov PUSH in PULL privedel do nelojalne konkurence med letalskimi prevozniki EU;
Welcomes the willingness of the DHS to move to the PUSH system no later than 1 January 2008 in principle, but regrets the fact that the shift – already foreseen in the 2004 PNR agreement – has been delayed for years, even if the condition of technical feasibility has long since been met; believes that the PUSH system for all carriers should be a sine qua non for any PNR transfer; stresses that the concurrent existence of the 'PUSH' and 'PULL' systems could lead to a distortion of competition between EU carriers;
vztraja, da so skupni redni pregledi DHS in EU izčrpni, da se izvajajo vsakoletno in da so njihove ugotovitve objavljene; vztraja, da morajo pregledi vsebovati oceno učinkovitosti ukrepov, kar zadeva večjo varnost; obžaluje dejstvo, da pri pregledih ni predvideno sodelovanje evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov oziroma njegovih nacionalnih kolegov, kar je določal prejšnji sporazum PNR;
Insists that the joint periodical review by the DHS and the EU must be comprehensive and take place annually and that the results must be published; insists that the review includes an assessment of the effectiveness of the measures in terms of greater security; regrets the fact that the review does not foresee any involvement of national or European data protection supervisors, which was provided for under the previous PNR agreement;
vztraja, da morajo biti potniki primerno obveščeni o uporabi njihovih podatkov in o njihovih pravicah ter da je obveščanje naloga prevoznikov; meni, da morata DHS in Komisija prevzeti odgovornost za obveščanje potnikov ter predlaga, da bi si potniki lahko prebrali „Kratko obvestilo o potovanju med Evropsko unijo in ZDA“, kar je predlagala delovna skupina iz člena 29 (WP 132);
Insists that passengers must be properly informed of the use of their data and their rights, and that this obligation rests with the airlines; believes that the DHS and the Commission must take responsibility for the information provided to passengers and proposes that the 'Short notice for travel between the European Union and the United States' suggested by the Article 29 Working Party (WP 132) be made available to all passengers;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se pri pogajanjih Unije z ZDA niso upoštevali ne Direktiva 2004/82/ES niti sporazuma PNR med EU in Avstralijo oziroma Kanado, s katerima so zagotovljeni višji standardi varstva osebnih podatkov;
Regrets the fact that the EU's negotiations with the US took no account of Directive 2004/82 or of the EU's PNR agreements with Australia and Canada, which ensure higher standards of protection of personal data;
opozarja, da upravni sporazum med EU in ZDA ne sme imeti učinka znižanja ravni varstva osebnih podatkov, kot jo zagotavljajo nacionalne zakonodaje držav članic; obžaluje, da bo sporazum ustvaril še dodatno zmedo glede obveznosti letalskih prevoznikov EU in glede temeljnih pravic državljanov EU;
Recalls that the administrative agreement concluded between the EU and the US must not have the effect of reducing the level of protection of personal data assured by Member States' national legislations, and regrets the prospect of further confusion as to the obligations of EU airlines and the fundamental rights of EU citizens;
Glede varstva podatkov
As regards data protection
pozdravlja določbo, po kateri bo ameriški zakon o zasebnosti v upravnih zadevah veljal tudi za državljane EU;
Welcomes the provision that the US Privacy Act will be extended administratively to EU citizens;
obžaluje dejstvo, da si DHS v skladu z zakonom o prostem dostopu do informacij pridržuje pravico do izjem;
Regrets the fact that the DHS reserves the right to introduce exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act;
obžaluje, da sporazumu ne določa natančnih meril, po katerih bi lahko definicijo varovanja osebnih podatkov DHS ocenili kot ustrezno glede na standarde EU;
Regrets the failure of the agreement to foresee precise criteria for the definition of the protection of personal data offered by the DHS as adequate according to EU standards;
pri tem obžaluje, da so lahko podatki PNR državljanov Evropske unije obdelani izključno po predpisih ZDA brez ustrezne presoje ali kakršne koli navedbe specifičnih ameriških predpisov, ki se pri tem uporabljajo;
Deplores in this respect the fact that EU citizens' PNR data can be treated solely according to US law, without an adequacy assessment or any indication concerning the specific US legislation applicable;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se bo obdobje hrambe podatkov PNR s 3 in pol let podaljšalo na 15 let, kar bo retroaktivno veljalo tudi za podatke, zbrane po prejšnjih sporazumih o PNR; izreka odločno kritiko nad dejstvom, da po 15-letnem obdobju hrambe, sestavljenem iz 7-letnega „aktivnega“ obdobja in 8-letnega „obdobja mirovanja“, ni nobenih jamstev, da bodo podatki dokončno izbrisani;
Deplores the fact that the length of retention of PNR data will be extended from 3.5 years to 15 years, as well as this being retroactively applied to data collected under the previous PNR agreements; strongly criticises the fact that after the 15-year retention period, composed of a 7-year 'active' and an 8-year 'dormant' period, there is no guarantee that the data will be definitively deleted;
je seznanjen s tem, da se je število podatkovnih polj s 34 zmanjšalo na 19, a poudarja, da je zmanjšanje v veliki meri zgolj kozmetično, saj so bila podatkovna polja združena in preimenovana, ne pa črtana;
Takes note of the reduction in data fields from 34 to 19, but points out that the reduction is largely cosmetic due to the merging and renaming of data fields instead of actual deletion;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bo DHS razpolagal z občutljivimi podatki (tj. osebnimi podatki, ki kažejo na rasno ali narodnostno poreklo, politične nazore, verska ali filozofska prepričanja, članstvo v sindikatu, ter podatki v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem ali spolnim življenjem posameznikov) in da jih bo DHS lahko uporabljal v izjemnih primerih;
Notes with concern that sensitive data (i.e. personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, and data concerning the health or sex life of the individual), will be made available to the DHS and that these data may be used by the DHS in exceptional cases;
je zaskrbljen nad dejstvom, da bodo podatki v „aktivnih analitičnih zbirkah podatkov“ shranjeni sedem let, kar vodi v precejšnjo nevarnost množičnega profiliranja in izkopavanja podatkov, kar je nezdružljivo s temeljnimi evropskimi načeli, poleg tega pa gre za prakso, o kateri še vedno poteka razprava v ameriškem kongresu;
Is concerned that data will be kept for seven years in 'active analytical databases', leading to a significant risk of massive profiling and data mining, which is incompatible with basic European principles and is a practice still under discussion in the US Congress;
Glede izmenjave informacij
As regards sharing of information
obžaluje, da v sporazumu ni natančno opredeljeno, kateri organi ZDA lahko dostopajo do podatkov PNR;
Regrets the failure of the agreement to define precisely which US authorities may access the PNR data;
odločno nasprotuje določbi, po kateri bi tretje države do podatkov PNR splošno lahko dostopale že, če bi izpolnjevale določene pogoje DHS, ne glede na predpise o varstvu podatkov EU, ter da bi te države izjemoma, v neopredeljenih izrednih primerih, lahko do podatkov PNR dostopale brez zagotovil, da bodo z njimi ravnale v skladu z ravnjo varstva podatkov DHS;
Strongly opposes the provision that third countries in general may be given access to PNR data if adhering to DHS-specified conditions, rather than under EU data protection legislation, and that third countries may exceptionally, in unspecified emergency cases, be given access to PNR data without assurances that the data will be handled according to the DHS level of data protection;
obžaluje, da se je Unija strinjala, da se ne vmešava glede varstva osebnih podatkov državljanov EU v primerih, ko bi ZDA podatke izmenjale s tretjimi državami;
Regrets the fact that the EU has accepted not to interfere concerning the protection of EU citizens' PNR data that may be shared by the US with third countries;
ugotavlja, da sporazum omogoča, da DHS drugim ameriškim vladnim organom posreduje podatke PNR v zvezi s specifičnimi primeri in v skladu z naravo primera; obžaluje, da v sporazumu ni natančno navedeno, kateri organi ZDA lahko dostopajo do podatkov PNR, in da so cilji, predvideni v členu I pisma DHS, zelo široki;
Notes that the agreement allows the DHS to provide PNR data to other domestic government authorities in relation to specific cases and in proportion to the nature of the case; regrets that the agreement lacks any indication as to which US authorities may access the PNR data and that the purposes foreseen in Article I of the DHS letter are very broad;
Glede evropskega sistema PNR
As regards a European PNR system
ugotavlja, da se sporazum sklicuje na možni prihodnji sistem PNR na ravni EU oziroma ene ali več držav članic, in da navaja, da bi bili vsi podatki PNR iz takšnega sistema lahko na voljo DHS;
Notes that the agreement makes reference to a possible future PNR system at the level of the EU or in one or more of its Member States, and the provision that any PNR data in such a system may be made available to the DHS;
zahteva, da Komisija pojasni, ali se dejansko pripravlja evropski sistem PNR in predstavi možnostno študijo, za katero pravi, da jo je izvedla;
Demands that the Commission clarify the state of play with regard to an EU PNR system, including making available the feasibility study it has pledged to undertake;
se pridružuje zaskrbljenosti, ki jo je delovna skupina iz člena 29 izrazila v zvezi z uporabo podatkov PNR za namene kazenskega pregona, in Evropsko komisijo poziva, da utemelji:
Repeats the concerns expressed by the Article 29 Working Party as regards the use of PNR data for law enforcement purposes, notably calling on the Commission to substantiate:
(a) operativno potrebo in namen zbiranja podatkov PNR na točki vstopa na ozemlje Evropske unije;
(a) the operational need and purpose of collecting PNR data at the point of entry into EU territory;
(b) dodano vrednost zbiranja podatkov PNR v primerjavi z že obstoječimi kontrolnimi ukrepi na točki vstopa v EU za namene varnosti (schengenski sistem, vizumski informacijski sistem, sistem API);
(b) the added value of collecting PNR data in the light of the already existing control measures at the point of entry into the EU for security purposes, such as the Schengen system, the Visa Information System, and the API system;
(c) predvideno uporabo podatkov PNR, zlasti če bodo uporabljeni za identifikacijo oseb za namene zagotavljanja varnosti v letalskem prometu, za identifikacijo oseb, ki vstopajo na ozemlje EU, ali za splošno negativno ali pozitivno profiliranje potnikov;
(c) the use that is foreseen for PNR data, in particular whether it is for identifying individuals in order to ensure air security, for identifying who enters the territory of the EU, or for general negative or positive profiling of passengers;
vztraja pri zahtevi, da pri vseh teh vprašanjih v skladu s členom 71,1c PES in členom 251 PES sodeluje tudi Evropski parlament;
Insists that the European Parliament be involved in all relevant developments, pursuant to Articles 71(1)(c) and 251 of the EC Treaty;
opozarja, da bo sporazum o PNR sčasoma treba pregledati glede na prihodnje institucionalne reforme Unije, nakazane v sklepih Evropskega sveta junija 2007, in v skladu z mandatom prihodnje medvladne konference;
Recalls that the PNR agreement will eventually have to be reviewed in the light of the future EU institutional reforms referred to in the conclusions of the European Council of June 2007 and in the mandate for the next IGC;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter kongresu ZDA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States, and the US Congress.
ki ga vlagajo Annemie Neuyts-Uyttebroeck, Sajjad Karim, Marco Cappato in Marios Matsakis
by Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Sajjad Karim, Marco Cappato and Marios Matsakis
o razmerah v Pakistanu
on Pakistan
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Pakistanu
European Parliament resolution on Pakistan