natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja sprejetje odločitve o povečanju sredstev na razpolago kulturnemu sektorju v proračunski vrstici 15 04 01 03 za 1 000 000 EUR; opozarja na svojo zgoraj navedeno resolucijo z dne 27. oktobra 2005 o prvi obravnavi proračuna za leto 2006, zlasti odstavek 33; poziva Komisijo, da razporedi dodatni razpoložljivi znesek, zlasti ob upoštevanju organizacij, ki so vrsto let uspešno prejemale podporo iz donacij Evropske unije, kot so Mladinski orkester Evropske unije, Baročni orkester Evropske unije in Fundacija Yehudi Menuhin;
Welcomes the decision taken to increase the funds available for cultural organisations (15 04 01 03) by EUR 1 million voted under line 15 06 01 07; recalls its abovementioned resolution of 27 October 2005 on the first reading for the 2006 budget, in particular paragraph 33 thereof; asks the Commission to implement the allocation of this additional amount available, in particular with reference to those organisations which have been successfully supported for many years through grants from the European Union, such as the European Union Youth Orchestra, the European Union Baroque Orchestra and the Yehudi Menuhin Foundation;
zahteva od institucij, da do 15. februarja 2006 pošljejo skupno poročilo o zaposlovanju, vezanem na širitev, vključno s statističnimi podatki iz obdobja do 15. januarja 2006 o številu in stopnjah delovnih mest, ki jih zaseda stalno osebje po nacionalnosti in začasno osebje ter o številu in stopnjah prostih delovnih mest; poziva institucije, da v poročilo vključijo akcijski načrt z ukrepi za nadaljnje zaposlovanje in razrešijo problem razpoložljivosti kandidatov iz določenih kategorijah in držav;
Requests that the institutions transmit, by 15 February 2006, a joint report on enlargement recruitment including statistics as of 15 January 2006 on the number and grade of posts occupied by permanent staff by nationality, of posts occupied by temporary staff and of vacant posts; invites the institutions to include in the report an action plan with measures for further recruitment and addressing the problem of availability of candidates in certain categories from certain Member States;
Razdelek 7: Predpristopna strategija
Heading 7: Pre-Accession Strategy
potrjuje svoj sklep, da bo dosegel večjo proračunsko preglednost v zvezi s pomočjo Skupnosti državam kandidatkam ali potencialnim državam kandidatkam, zlasti kar zadeva začetek veljavnosti novega predpristopnega instrumenta, ki bo v en sam dokument združil različne geografske in tematske programe;
Confirms its decision to provide for greater budgetary transparency in relation to Community assistance to candidate or pre-candidate countries, especially with a view to the entry into force of the new pre-accession instrument, which will consolidate into one single act a variety of geographical and thematic programmes;
naroči svojemu predsedniku naj razglasi, da je proračun dokončno sprejet, in naj poskrbi za njegovo objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Instructs its President to declare that the budget has been finally adopted and arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču, Računskemu sodišču, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov in drugim zadevnim institucijam ter organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the other institutions and bodies concerned.
Evropski parlament in Svet pozoveta Komisijo, da čim prej v letu 2006 sprejme primerne ukrepe za ustrezne prenose sredstev, da se uresničijo o SZVP dosežen sporazum in programi, sprejeti po postopku soodločanja.
The European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission to take the appropriate measures for the relevant transfers, as soon as possible in 2006, in order to put into effect this agreement reached on CFSP and co-decided programmes.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Odločbe Sveta o spremembi Odločbe 2004/465/ES o finančnem prispevku Skupnosti za programe nadzora ribištva držav članic ( KOM(2005)0328 – C6-0273/2005 – 2005/0136(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision amending Decision 2004/465/EC on a Community financial contribution towards Member States' fisheries control programmes ( COM(2005)0328 – C6-0273/2005 – 2005/0136(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0328 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0328 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0273/2005 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0273/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0339/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0339/2005 ),
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Sprememb Parlamenta Sprememba 1 UVODNA IZJAVA 6
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 RECITAL 6
V Odločbo 2004/465/ES je primerno vključiti študije o nadzoru ribištva kot tudi dogovore, zasnovane za lažje izvajanje tehnologij na področju nadzora –
It is appropriate to include in Decision 2004/465/EC studies on fisheries control as well as arrangements designed to facilitate the implementation of new technologies on control.
Letni programi za leto 2006 se predložijo najpozneje v roku...*
The annual programmes for 2006 shall be submitted not later than ...*.
Sprememba 3 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 2 Člen 4, odstavek 1, točki (i) in (j) (Odločba 2004/465/ES)
Amendment 3 ARTICLE 1, POINT 2 Article 4, paragraph 1, points (i) and (j) (Decision 2004/465/EC)
V členu 4(1) se dodata točki:
In Article 4, paragraph 1 the following points are added:
"(i) upravni dogovori s Skupnim raziskovalnim središčem za izvedbo novih tehnologij na področju nadzora;
"(i) Administrative arrangements with the Joint Research Centre aimed at implementing new technologies on control;
Sprememba 4 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 A (novo) Člen 5, odstavek 2 a (novo) (Odločba 2004/465/ES)
Amendment 4 ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 A (new) Article 5, paragraph 2 a (new) (Decision 2004/465/EC)
(3a) V členu 5 se doda odstavek:
(3a) In Article 5, the following paragraph is added:
Sprememba 5 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3 B (novo) Člen 6, odstavek 2, točka (c) (Odločba 2004/465/ES)
Amendment 5 ARTICLE 1, POINT 3 B (new) Article 6, paragraph 2, point (c) (Decision 2004/465/EC)
(3b) V členu 6(2) se točka (c) nadomesti z:
(3b) In Article 6, paragraph 2, point (c) is replaced by:
"(c) za ukrepe iz člena 4(1)(h) stopnja ne sme presegati 75 % upravičenih izdatkov za nove države članice."
"(c) for the actions referred to in Article 4(1)(h), the rate may not exceed 75% of the eligible expenditure for the new Member States."
Sprememba 6 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 4 Člen 6, odstavek 2, točka (d) (Odločba 2004/465/ES)
Amendment 6 ARTICLE 1, POINT 4 Article 6, paragraph 2, point (d) (Decision 2004/465/EC)
V členu 6(2) se doda točka:
In Article 6, paragraph 2 the following point is added:
"(d) za ukrepe iz členov 4(1)(i) in 4(1)(j) je lahko stopnja 100 % upravičenih izdatkov."
"(d) for the actions referred to in Article 4(1)(i) and 4(1)(j), the rate may be 100% of the eligible expenditure;"
Sprememba 7 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 8 A (novo) Člen 17, odstavek 1 a (novo) (Odločba 2004/465/ES)
Amendment 7 ARTICLE 1, POINT 8 A (new) Article 17, paragraph 1 a (new) (Decision 2004/465/EC)
(8a) V členu 17 se doda odstavek:
(8a) In Article 17, the following paragraph is added:
"Na podlagi informacij, ki jih posredujejo države članice v skladu s členom 16, Komisija najpozneje do 31. decembra 2006 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži vmesno poročilo o uporabi te odločbe."
"By 31 December 2006 at the latest and on the basis of the information provided by the Member States pursuant to Article 16, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council an interim report on the application of this Decision."
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila (9856/2005 – C6-0274/2005 – 2003/0175(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures (9856/2005 – C6-0274/2005 – 2003/0175(COD) )
ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (9856/2005 – C6-0274/2005 ),
having regard to the Council common position (9856/2005 – C6-0274/2005 ),
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0448 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0448 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0377/2005 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0377/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 1999/62/ES UL L 187, 20.7.1999, str.
Having regard to Directive 1999/62/EC OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p.
in zlasti člena 7 Direktive,
, and in particular Article 7 thereof,
Evropskega parlamenta z dne 20. aprila 2004 (UL C
of the European Parliament of 20 April 2004 (OJ C
stališče Sveta z dne
Council Common Position of
UL C 275 E, 8.11.2005, str.
OJ C 275 E, 8.11.2005, p.
Odpravljanje izkrivljanja konkurence med prevoznimi podjetji v državah članicah, pravilno delovanje notranjega trga in izboljšana konkurenčnost so odvisni od vzpostavitve pravičnih mehanizmov pristojbin za prevoznike za uporabo infrastrukture.
Eliminating distortions of competition between transport undertakings in the Member States, the proper functioning of the internal market and improved competitiveness all depend on fair mechanisms being established to charge hauliers for the cost of infrastructure use.
Z Direktivo 1999/62/ES je bila že dosežena določena stopnja usklajenosti.
A degree of harmonisation has already been achieved through Directive 1999/62/EC.
Pravičnejši sistem pristojbin za uporabo cestne infrastrukture,
A fairer system of charging for the use of road infrastructure
ki temelji na načelu "uporabnik plača", in na možnosti uporabe načela "onesnaževalce plača", na primer s spreminjanjem cestnin, ki upošteva okoljski učinek vozil,
, based on the "user pays" principle and the ability to apply the "polluter pays" principle, for instance through the variation of tolls to take account of the environmental performance of vehicles,
je ključnega pomena za spodbujanje trajnostnega prometa Skupnosti.
is crucial in order to encourage sustainable transport in the Community.
Cilj, da se obstoječe cestno omrežje kar najbolje uporablja in da se negativni vpliv tega omrežja pomembno zmanjša, bi moral biti v korist zdrave gospodarske rasti in pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga,
The objective of making optimum use of the existing road network and achieving a significant reduction in its negative impact should be achieved
vključno z obrobnimi regijami
in such a way as to avoid double taxation and
, dosežen brez uvajanja dodatnih obremenitev za prevoznike
without imposing additional burdens on operators, in the interests of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the internal market
Komisija je v Beli knjigi "Evropska prometna politika za 2010: čas za odločitev" razglasila svojo namero, da bo predlagala direktivo o pristojbinah za uporabo cestne infrastrukture.
The Commission announced its intention of proposing a directive on charging for the use of road infrastructure in the White Paper "European transport policy for 2010: time to decide".
z dne 12. februarja 2003
its resolution
UL C 43 E, 19.2.2004, str.
OJ C 43 E 19.2.2004, p.
Po Evropskem svetu v Göteborgu 15.
Following the Göteborg European Council of 15
in 16.
and 16
junija 2001, ki je še posebej poudaril vprašanje trajnostnega prometa, sta tudi Evropska sveta v Kopenhagnu 12. in 13. decembra 2002 ter v Bruslju 20. in 21. marca 2003 pozdravila namero Komisije, da predloži novo direktivo o "Eurovinjeti".
June 2001, which drew particular attention to the issue of sustainable transport, the Copenhagen European Council of 12 and 13 December 2002 and the Brussels European Council of 20 and 21 March 2003 also welcomed the Commission's intention of presenting a new "Eurovignette" Directive.
Predsedstvo je v odstavku 29 sklepov sestanka s 15. in 16. junija 2001 v Göteborgu navedlo, da bi se trajnostna transportna politika morala spopasti z vedno večjo količino prometa, zastojev, hrupa in onesnaževanja in da bi morala spodbujati uporabo okolju prijaznih prevoznih sredstev in popolno ponotranjenje družbenih in okoljskih stroškov.
In paragraph 29 of the Presidency conclusions of its meeting of 15 and 16 June 2001 in Göteborg, the European Council stated that a sustainable transport policy should tackle rising volumes of traffic and levels of congestion, noise and pollution and encourage the use of environment-friendly modes of transport as well as the full internalisation of social and environmental costs.
Pri določanju cestnin Direktiva 1999/62/ES upošteva stroške gradnje infrastrukture, njenega obratovanja, vzdrževanja in razvoja.
For the purposes of setting tolls, Directive 1999/62/EC takes account of infrastructure construction, operating, maintenance and development costs.
Da se zagotovi preglednost stroškov gradnje, ki se lahko upoštevajo, je potrebna posebna določba.
A specific provision is needed to ensure clarity regarding the construction costs that may be taken into account.
Mednarodni prevozi v cestnem prometu so osredotočeni na vseevropsko cestno prometno omrežje.
International road transport operations are concentrated on the trans-European road transport network.
Poleg tega je dobro delovanje notranjega trga življenjskega pomena za komercialne prevoze.
Furthermore, the proper functioning of the internal market is vital to commercial transport.
Odločba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Odločbo št. 884/2004/ES (UL L 167, 30.4.2004, str.
Decision as last amended by Decision No 884/2004/EC (OJ L 167, 30.4.2004, p.
Države članice bi morale imeti pravico, da lahko v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in ob upoštevanju Pogodbe svobodno zaračunavajo cestnine in/ali uporabnine na cestah izven vseevropskega cestnega omrežja.
Member States should, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, be free to apply tolls and/or user charges on roads other than those on the trans-European road network, in compliance with the Treaty.
Kjer se države članice odločijo, da obdržijo ali uvedejo cestnine in/ali uporabnine le na odsekih vseevropskega cestnega omrežja, ki poteka po njihovem ozemlju, zaradi razlogov, kakor so odročnost, malo zastojev ali nizka stopnja onesnaženosti, ali kjer je to potrebno zaradi uvedbe nove cestninske ureditve, bi morala biti izbira odsekov opravljena tako, da ni diskriminiran mednarodni promet in da ni izkrivljena konkurenca med prevozniki.
Where Member States choose to maintain or introduce tolls and/or user charges only on parts of the trans-European road network in their territory and not on others, for reasons such as their isolation or low levels of congestion or pollution or where essential for the introduction of a new tolling arrangement, the choice of the parts of the network subject to tolls or charges should not discriminate against international traffic and should not result in distortions of competition between operators.
Enake zahteve bi bilo treba uporabiti, ko država članica ohrani ali uvede cestnine in/ali uporabnine na cestah, ki niso del vseevropskega cestnega omrežja, na primer na vzporednih cestah, s ciljem uravnavanja pretoka prometa.
The same requirements should apply to cases where a Member State maintains or introduces tolls and/or user charges on roads not forming part of the trans-European road network, for example on parallel roads, with a view to managing traffic flows.
Če se država članica odloči, da razširi cestnine in/ali uporabnine preko vseevropskega cestnega omrežja, na primer zato, da v ključi vzporedne ceste, na katere bi se lahko preusmeril promet s vseevropskega cestnega omrežja in/ali ki neposredno konkurirajo nekaterim odsekom tega omrežja, bi morala zagotoviti usklajevanje z oblastmi, ki so za te ceste odgovorne.
Where a Member State chooses to extend tolls and/or user charges beyond the trans-European road network, for example to include parallel roads to which traffic may be diverted from the trans-European road network and/or which are in direct competition with certain parts of that network, it should ensure coordination with the authorities responsible for these roads.
Zaradi stroškovne učinkovitosti pri izvajanju cestninskih sistemov ni nujno, da se na celotni infrastrukturi, za katero se plačuje cestnina, uvedejo omejitve dostopa za nadziranje zaračunanih cestnin.
For reasons of cost efficiency in the implementation of tolling systems, the entire infrastructure to which a toll relates may not necessarily be subject to access restrictions controlling tolls charged.
To pa ne bi smelo zapostavljati prometa, ki ni lokalne narave.
This should not discriminate against non-local traffic.
Cestnine bi se morale oblikovati na podlagi načela povračila infrastrukturnih stroškov.
Tolls should be based on the principle of recovery of infrastructure costs.
Dejstvo, da uporabnik lahko sprejema odločitve, ki bodo vplivale na breme, ki ga bodo zanj predstavljale cestnine, s tem, da se odloči za okolju najbolj prijazna vozila in prometno manj obremenjene ure ali poti, je pomemben sestavni del sistema cestnih pristojbin.
The fact that the user is able to take decisions which will influence the burden of tolls by choosing the least polluting vehicles and less congested periods or itineraries is an important component of a charging system.
Države članice bi tako morale imeti možnost, da predvidijo različne cestnine glede na emisijsko kategorijo vozila (klasifikacija "EURO") in raven škode, ki jo to vozilo povzroča cestam in krajem ter glede na čas vožnje in prometno obremenjenost.
Member States should therefore be able to differentiate tolls according to a vehicle's emission category ("EURO" classification) and the level of damage it causes to roads, the place, the time and the amount of congestion.
Takšno razlikovanje v ravneh cestnin bi moralo biti sorazmerno z zastavljenim ciljem.
Such differentiation in the level of tolls should be proportionate to the objective pursued.
Vidiki komercialnega zaračunavanja uporabe cestne infrastrukture, ki jih ne ureja ta direktiva, bi morala spoštovati pravila Pogodbe.
Aspects of commercial pricing for road infrastructure use not covered by this Directive should respect the rules of the Treaty.
Ta direktiva ne vpliva na
This Directive does not affect the freedom
držav članic, ki uvedejo sistem cestnin in/ali uporabnin za infrastrukturo, da brez poseganja v člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe predvidijo ustrezno povračilo teh dajatev.
Member States which introduce a system of tolls and/or user charges for infrastructure to provide, without prejudice to Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty, appropriate compensation for these charges.
Takšna povračila ne bi smela povzročiti izkrivljanja konkurence na notranjem trgu, določena pa bi morala biti ob upoštevanju ustreznih določb prava Skupnosti, zlasti najnižjih stopenj davkov na vozila, določenih v Prilogi I k Direktivi 1999/62/ES in določb Direktive Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije UL L 283, 31.10.2003, str.
Such compensation should not lead to distortions of competition within the internal market and should be subject to the relevant provisions of Community law, in particular the minimum rates of vehicle taxes set out in Annex I to Directive 1999/62/EC and the provisions of Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p.
Kadar države članice pobirajo cestnine ali uporabnine za uporabo cest v vseevropskem cestnem omrežju, bi morale pri svojih načrtih vzdrževanja dati ustrezno prednost cestam, za katere se pobirajo te pristojbine.
Where Member States levy tolls or user charges for use of roads in the trans-European road network, the roads subject to charging should be given appropriate priority in the maintenance schedules of Member States.
Prihodki iz cestnin ali uporabnin bi se morali uporabiti za vzdrževanje ustrezne infrastrukture in celotnega prometnega sektorja za uravnotežen in trajnosten razvoj prometnih omrežij.
Revenues from tolls or user charges should be used for the maintenance of the infrastructure concerned and the transport sector as a whole, in the interest of the balanced and sustainable development of transport networks.
Posebno pozornost bi bilo treba posvetiti gorskim regijam kot so Alpe in Pireneji.
Particular attention should be devoted to mountain regions such as the Alps or the Pyrenees.
Pristojbine bi morale biti nediskriminatorne, njihovo pobiranje pa se mora izvajati brez pretiranih formalnosti in ne sme povzročati ovir na notranjih mejah.
Fees should be non-discriminatory and their collection should not involve excessive formalities or create barriers at internal borders.
Zlasti tam, kjer se cestnine in/ali uporabnine pobirajo izključno z uporabo sistema, ki zahteva uporabo elektronske plačilne naprave, vgrajene v vozilo, bi bilo zato treba sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za lažje plačevanje s strani občasnih uporabnikov.
Appropriate measures should therefore be taken to facilitate payment by occasional users, in particular where tolls and/or user charges are collected exclusively by means of a system that requires use of an electronic payment tool (on-board unit).
Da se prepreči preusmeritve prometa med državami članicami in tretjimi državami zaradi različnih režimov, bi si morala Komisija pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih prizadevati zagotoviti, da tretje države ne sprejmejo nobenih ukrepov, ki bi lahko diskriminatorno vplivali na tranzitni promet, na primer sistem za trgovanje s tranzitnimi pravicami.
In order to prevent traffic being diverted because of different regimes between Member States and third countries, the Commission should try to ensure that, when negotiating international agreements, no measures are taken by third countries, such as a transit right trading system, that might have a discriminatory effect on transit traffic.
s temeljnimi načeli,
set of core principles
določenimi v Prilogi II,
set out in Annex II
ali pa morajo biti stroški določeni na ravni, ki ne presega ravni, ki bi izhajala iz uporabe teh načel.
or be set at a level which does not go beyond that which would result from the application of these principles.
Te zahteve se ne bi smele uporabljati za obstoječe ureditve, razen v primeru, če se slednje v prihodnosti bistveno spremenijo.
These requirements should not apply to existing arrangements unless they are substantially modified in the future.
Takšne bistvene spremembe bi vključevale kakršno koli pomembne spremembe prvotnih določb in pogojev cestninske sheme, ki bi nastale s spremembo pogodbe, sklenjene z upravljavcem cestninskega sistema, vendar bi izključevale spremembe, ki so bile predvidene v prvotni shemi.
Such substantial modifications would include any significant change to the original terms and conditions of the tolling scheme through modification of a contract with the tolling system operator but would exclude changes provided for in the original scheme.
V primeru koncesijskih pogodb bi se lahko bistvene spremembe izvedle po postopku javnih naročil.
In the case of concession contracts, substantial modification could be implemented pursuant to a public procurement process.