natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Junija 2004 je Komisija podprla sklenitev političnega sporazuma med Hrvaško, Italijo in Slovenijo o neuporabi hrvaške cone za države članice.
In June 2004, the Commission facilitated a political Agreement between Croatia, Italy and Slovenia on the non-application of the Croatian zone to Member States.
Evropski svet je ta sporazum pozdravil na svojem zasedanju junija 2004, nanj pa se je skliceval tudi pogajalski okvir iz oktobra 2005.
This Agreement was welcomed by the June 2004 European Council and referred to in the Negotiating Framework of October 2005.
Po odločitvi hrvaškega parlamenta decembra 2006, da se hrvaška zaščitna ekološko-ribolovna cona uporablja za države članice, je Komisija dejavno prispevala k več tehničnim srečanjem med Hrvaško, Italijo in Slovenijo.
Following the decision of the Croatian parliament of December 2006 to implement the Croatian Ecological and Fisheries Protection Zone to Member States, the Commission actively contributed to several technical meetings between Croatia, Italy and Slovenia.
Ta srečanja so bila namenjena premostitvi razlik v stališčih med zadevnimi državami ter zagotovitvi trajnostnega ribolovnega režima na Jadranu v skladu z načeli skupne ribiške politike in ukrepov upravljanja, določenih v pravnem redu za Sredozemlje.
The objective was to bridge the positions between the countries' concerned and to ensure a sustainable fisheries regime in the Adriatic, in line with the principles of the common fisheries policy and the management measures of the acquis for the Mediterranean.
Komisija je še naprej pripravljena pomagati pri organiziranju takih srečanj, če se vse zadevne strani s tem strinjajo.
The Commission is ready to continue to facilitate such meetings, provided all parties concerned agree.
Komisija je pozvala Hrvaško, naj dosledno spoštuje sporazum z dne 4. junija 2004 glede zaščitne ekološko-ribolovne cone in naj ne uporablja nobenega vidika te cone za države članice, dokler se ne doseže skupni dogovor v duhu EU.
The Commission has called on Croatia to fully respect the 4 June 2004 Agreement concerning the Ecological and Fisheries Protection Zone and not to apply any aspect of the zone to the Member States until a common agreement in the EU spirit is found.
Zdaj, ko je bila na Hrvaškem oblikovana nova vlada, je treba nujno poiskati rešitev, da bi se izognili negativnim posledicam za proces pristopa Hrvaške k EU.
Now that a new government has been formed in Croatia it is essential to find a solution as a matter of urgency in order to avoid negative consequences for the country's EU accession process.
Odgovor Androule Vassiliou v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mrs Vassiliou on behalf of the Commission
V tem primeru države članice določijo pogoje, pod katerimi se lahko dodeli nadomestilo.
In that case the Member States define the conditions under which compensation may be granted.
Komisija je zaskrbljena in pozorno spremlja možnost izkoriščanja žensk na področju darovanja jajčnih celic.
The Commission is concerned and alerted to the potential for the exploitation of women in the field of egg donations.
Leta 2006 je objavila poročilo o darovanju reproduktivnih celic Poročilo o ureditvi darovanja reproduktivnih celic v Evropski uniji, februar 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/keydo_tissues_cells_en.htm. , v katerem je pregledala ureditve držav članic na področju darovanja reproduktivnih celic.
In 2006, the Commission produced a report on the Reproductive Cell Donation Report on the regulation of Reproductive Cell Donation in the European Union, February 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/keydo_tissues_cells_en.htm which reviewed the regulatory status of reproductive cell donation in Member States.
Rezultati so pokazali, da so ureditve različne, hkrati pa so potrdili, da so upoštevana temeljna načela zaupnosti, anonimnosti in neplačljivosti.
The results showed a varied picture but with the core principles of confidentiality, anonymity and non-remuneration being upheld.
Poročilo Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o prostovoljnem in neplačljivem darovanju tkiv in celic COM(2006) 593 konč.
The Commission's report to Parliament and Council on voluntary and unpaid donation of tissues and cells COM(2006)593 final.
Poročilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o ukrepih držav članic za spodbujanje prostovoljnega neplačljivega darovanja tkiv in celic. je temeljilo na poročilih 24 držav članic vključno z Belgijo.
Report from the Commission to the Council and the Parliament on the promotion by Member States of voluntary unpaid donation of tissues and cells. was based on the national reports from 24 Member States including Belgium.
Komisija je predlagala, da se zberejo podrobnejši podatki o ukrepih za nadomestilo darovalcem.
The Commission suggested that more detailed information was required in relation to compensatory measures for donors.
Da bi Komisija imela boljši pregled nad položajem v posameznih državah, v sodelovanju z državami članicami pripravlja študijo za posodobitev in podrobnejšo preučitev ključnih vprašanj v zvezi s prostovoljnim in neplačljivim darovanjem, vključno z reproduktivnimi celicami.
In seeking more accuracy on country specific cases, the Commission is currently working on a study with Member States to update and further examine key issues related to voluntary and unpaid donations, including reproductive cells.
Študija bo omogočila pregled različnih zakonodaj na področju umetnega oplojevanja ter zagotovila podrobnejše podatke o različnih ukrepih za nadomestila ter smernicah za oglaševanje držav članic.
This study will provide an overview on the different assisted reproduction legislations as well as more detailed data on the different compensatory measures and advertising guidelines in place in Member States.
Izsledki študije bodo vključeni v naslednje poročilo Komisije Svetu in Parlamentu o prostovoljnem in neplačljivem darovanju, ki ga bo Komisija pripravila v skladu s členom 12.1.
The next Commission report to the Council and Parliament on voluntary and unpaid donations, as laid out in Article 12.1, will include the findings of this study.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-1776/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-1776/08
Zadeva: Odziv Komisije na prodajo slovenskih parcel na južni strani reke Dragonje
Subject: Commission response to the sale of Slovenian land on the south side of the river Dragonja
Pozdravljam odločitev Hrvaške o zamrznitvi izvajanja ekološko-ribolovne cone za članice Evropske unije, ki je bila dosežena tudi z naporom Evropske komisije.
I welcome the fact that Croatia is exempting EU Member States from the provisions concerning the ecological and fishing zone, its decision to that effect having been secured not least through the efforts of the Commission.
Vendar moram hkrati Komisijo obvestiti, da odločitev o uveljavitvi cone ni bila edina enostranska odločitev Republike Hrvaške, ki naj bi prejudicirala določitev meje na kopnem in morju.
However, I have to point out that the decision to set up the zone is not the only unilateral decision to have been taken by Croatia with the aim of anticipating the delimitation of the land and sea border.
V zadnjem času Hrvaška omogoča nakup parcel na južni strani reke Dragonje, na ozemlju, ki ga imata obe državi za svoje in je v tem smislu sporno.
Croatia has recently been allowing plots of land to be bought up on the south side of the river Dragonja, on territory which has been held by both countries and is to that extent disputed.
Hrvaška se je obvezala, da do sporazuma o meji te odločitve z enostranskimi potezami ne bo prejudicirala, zdaj pa je to še enkrat storila.
Croatia has promised not to take any unilateral decision in anticipation of the border agreement, but that is now what it has again done.
Komisijo sprašujem, ali in kako bo Hrvaško opozorila na nesprejemljivost takšnega ravnanja, ki je v nasprotju s sporazumom obeh vlad o izogibanju incidentov in evropsko prakso reševanja spornih vprašanj?
Will the Commission impress upon Croatia — and, if so, how — that this way of proceeding is unacceptable in that it is contrary to the agreement between the two governments on the avoidance of incidents, as well as to European dispute settlement practice?
Rehna v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Rehn on behalf of the Commission
Tako kot poslanec tudi Komisija pozdravlja odločitev hrvaškega parlamenta z dne 13. marca 2008, da Hrvaška ne bo izvajala nobenega vidika zaščitne ekološko-ribolovne cone za države članice, dokler ne bo sprejet skupni sporazum v duhu EU.
Like the Honourable Member, the Commission welcomes the fact that the Croatian Parliament decided on 13 March 2008 not to apply any aspect of the Ecological and Fisheries Protection Zone to the Member States until a common agreement in the EU spirit is found.
Komisija upa, da bo ta odločitev pripomogla k boljšim dvostranskim odnosom med Slovenijo in Hrvaško, tako da bo mogoče doseči napredek pri reševanju odprtih dvostranskih vprašanj, zlasti glede meje.
The Commission hopes that this decision will allow for improved bilateral relations between Slovenia and Croatia such that progress can be made towards resolving outstanding bilateral issues, in particular as regards the border.
Komisija se ne more izreči glede vprašanja, ali bi lahko bila navedena dejanja na mejnem območju v nasprotju z veljavnimi dvostranskimi sporazumi med Slovenijo in Hrvaško.
The Commission cannot comment on whether actions in the border area referred to might be contrary to existing bilateral arrangements between Slovenia and Croatia.
Kljub temu Komisija nenehno spodbuja Hrvaško in njene sosede pri iskanju končnih rešitev za vsa odprta dvostranka vprašanja v duhu dobrih sosedskih odnosov.
Nevertheless, the Commission consistently encourages Croatia and its neighbours to work on finding definitive solutions to all outstanding bilateral issues in the spirit of good neighbourly relations.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-3046/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3046/08
vlaga Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE-DE)
by Romana Jordan Cizelj (PPE-DE)
(2. junij 2008)
(2 June 2008)
Zadeva: Nepriznavanje potrdil o izvoru električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije v Italiji
Subject: Non-recognition in Italy of guarantees of origin for electricity from renewable energy sources
Decembra 2006 sem Komisiji zastavila pisno vprašanje o nepriznavanju slovenskih potrdil o izvoru električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije v Italiji.
In December 2006 I tabled a written question to the Commission concerning the non-recognition in Italy of Slovenian guarantees of origin for electricity from renewable energy sources.
Komisija je v odgovoru zapisala, da izvaja pravno analizo o tem, ali bi razloge za nepriznavanje slovenskih potrdil o izvoru lahko označili kot stvarne, pregledne in nediskriminatorne, ter da me bodo o izidu preiskave pravočasno obvestili.
In its reply, the Commission wrote that it was conducting a legal analysis of whether or not the reason given for non-recognition of Slovenian guarantees of origin could be considered objective, transparent and non-discriminatory, and that it would inform me of the outcome of that analysis in due course.
Po enem letu in pol vprašanje še vedno ni rešeno.
A year and a half later, the matter remains unresolved.
Po zadnjih informacijah postopek že več mesecev stoji na mestu.
According to the latest information the procedure has been at a standstill for a number of months.
To za energetska podjetja, vpletena v postopek, pomeni finančno breme, poslabšane poslovne odnose in negotovosti pri sprejemanju strateških odločitev.
For the energy companies involved in the procedure this is causing a financial burden, deteriorating business relations and uncertainty regarding strategic decision-making.
V času, ko so naši napori usmerjeni v zmanjšanje izpustov toplogrednih plinov in v razvoj gospodarstva z nizkimi izpusti, bi morali med drugim tudi vzpostaviti pregledne, nediskriminatorne in kar najhitrejše postopke, prvenstveno pri tehnologijah, ki spodbujajo trajnostni razvoj.
At a time when we are focusing our efforts on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and developing a low-emissions economy, we should also be putting in place transparent, non-discriminatory procedures that are as swift as possible, above all where they relate to technologies which promote sustainable development.
Ali Komisija meni, da je poleg zakonodajnih zahtev potrebno za znižanje izpustov toplogrednih plinov izboljšati tudi administrativne postopke na evropskem nivoju?
Does the Commission agree that reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires improving not only legislative requirements but also administrative procedures at European level?
Kaj namerava storiti Komisija, da bi skrajšala postopke odločanja v primerih nesporazumov med posameznimi državami članicami?
What action does the Commission intend to take to shorten decision-making procedures in cases where two Member States are unable to agree?
Kdaj bo Komisija sprejela odločitev o priznavanju slovenskih potrdil o izvoru za obnovljive vire električne energije, proizvedene v letu 2005?
When will the Commission adopt a decision on the recognition of Slovenian guarantees of origin for renewable sources of electricity produced in 2005?
(18. julij 2008)
(18 July 2008)
Dne 23. marca 2007 je Komisija poslala uradni opomin Italiji, v katerem je izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi italijanskega nepriznavanja nekaterih slovenskih potrdil o izvoru za elektriko iz obnovljivih virov energije.
On 23 March 2007, the Commission sent a letter of formal notice to Italy expressing concerns about the non-recognition in Italy of certain Slovenian guarantees of origin for electricity from renewable energy sources.
Pozneje je bilo o tej zadevi izmenjanih več pisem in informacij, ki naj bi podrobno pojasnile tehnične vidike.
The matter has subsequently been the subject of exchanges of letters and information to clarify the detailed technical aspects of the case.
V aprilu 2008 se je o tej zadevi razpravljajo na sestanku s slovenskimi organi.
In April 2008 a meeting was held to discuss the matter with the Slovene authorities.
Komisija se prav zdaj na podlagi informacij, ki jih je prejela na navedenem sestanku, odloča o nadaljnjih ukrepih v zvezi s tem in pričakuje se, da bo odločitev o tem sprejeta v kratkem.
Based on the information received at that meeting the Commission is currently engaged in the process of deciding on how best to proceed with the case, and a decision in this regard is expected to be taken shortly.
Komisija se popolnoma strinja, da je za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov in podpiranje uporabe električne energije iz obnovljivih virov treba izboljšati in pospešiti upravne postopke na vseh ravneh, tudi na evropski ravni.
The Commission fully agrees that reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting renewable electricity requires improving and expediting administrative procedures at all levels, including the European level.
Vendar pa imata moč in jasnost zakonodajnega okvira neposredne posledice za zapletenost in obsežnost upravnih nalog, povezanih z njegovim uveljavljanjem.
However, the strength and clarity of the legislative framework has direct implications for the complexity and extent of the administrative task related to its enforcement.
S tem v zvezi je Komisija ugotovila, da je bilo v preteklosti nekatere vidike zahtev Direktive 2001/77/ES Direktiva 2001/77/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. septembra 2001 o spodbujanju proizvodnje električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije na notranjem trgu z električno energijo ( UL L 283, 27.10.2001 ). težavno uveljavljati v praksi.
In this respect the Commission has found that in some aspects the requirements of Directive 2001/77/EC Directive 2001/77/EC of Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2001 on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market, OJ L 283, 27.10.2001. have proved to be challenging to enforce in practice.
Za prihodnost je zato izjemnega pomena, da se čimprej sprejme predlog nove direktive o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov, ki je bil predstavljen 23. januarja 2008 COM(2008) 19 konč. .
Looking forward it is therefore of the utmost importance that the proposal for a new directive on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources presented on 23 January 2008 COM(2008)19 final. is adopted as soon as possible.
Direktiva, kakršno je predlagala Komisija, bi zagotovila bistveno močnejši okvir z jasnejšimi določbami, ki bi olajšale in poenostavile ugotavljanje skladnosti ter tako izboljšale zmožnost Komisije, da zagotovi učinkovito uveljavljanje.
As proposed by the Commission, this directive would provide a significantly stronger framework with clearer provisions that would render assessment of compliance easier and more straightforward and thus improve the Commission's ability to ensure effective enforcement.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-3047/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3047/08
Zadeva: Notranji trg z električno energijo na Slovaškem
Subject: Internal electricity market in Slovakia
Cilji oblikovanja skupne evropske energetske politike so zmanjšanje uvozne odvisnosti, izboljšanje konkurenčnosti ter trajnostni razvoj.
The objectives of establishing a common European energy policy are to reduce import dependency, improve competitiveness and promote sustainable development.
Eno od področij skupne energetske politike je notranji trg na področju električne energije in plina.
One of the areas of the common energy policy is the internal market in electricity and gas.
Pravkar je v zakonodajnem postopku t. i. tretji liberalizacijski paket, za doseganje ciljev pa je pomembna tudi implementacija obstoječih zakonskih zahtev.
A ‘third liberalisation package’ is currently going through the legislative procedure, but implementation of existing legislative requirements is also important for achieving the objectives.
Slovaška vlada je julija 2007 sprejela nova pravila trga z električno energijo.
In July 2007 the Slovakian government adopted new electricity market rules.
Pravilo, ki je najbolj zaskrbljujoče, se nanaša na t. i. plačilo omrežnih storitev (system service fee), ki so ga doslej plačevali le končni uporabniki na Slovaškem.
The particular rule giving rise to most concern relates to the ‘system service fee’, which was previously only paid by end-users in Slovakia.
Po novem naj bi ga plačevali vsi izvozniki električne energije, proizvedene na Slovaškem.
Under the new arrangements, all exporters of electricity produced in Slovakia are required to pay the fee.
Izvzeti so le tisti udeleženci na trgu, ki električno energijo samo prenašajo čez Slovaško.
The only exceptions are those market participants who are merely transiting electricity across Slovakia.
Tovrstna odločitev slovaške vlade resno ogroža liberalizacijo trga z električno energijo ter ovira dostop na slovaški in s tem evropski trg z električno energijo.
This decision by the Slovakian government seriously jeopardises the liberalisation of the electricity market and hinders access to the Slovakian, and therefore European, market in electricity.
Se je Evropska komisija že odzvala na odločitev slovaške vlade o uvedbi teh plačil?
Has the Commission already responded to the Slovakian government’s decision to introduce these fees?
Če odziva še ni bilo, kakšne ukrepe je pričakovati in kdaj?
If it has not yet responded, what measures can be expected and when?
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-3048/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3048/08
Zadeva: Dolgoročne nakupne pogodbe na Madžarskem
Subject: Long-term power purchase agreements in Hungary
Madžarski urad za energijo HEO (Hungarian Energy Office) je pred nedavnim od vseh tržnih udeležencev zahteval podatke o dolgoročnih nakupnih pogodbah (long power purchase agreements).
The Hungarian Energy Office (HEO) recently required all market participants to provide details of their long-term power purchase agreements.
Kako namerava Evropska komisija reagirati na tovrstne kršitve notranjega trga z električno energijo?
How does the Commission intend to react to such infringements of the internal market in electricity?
Odgovor komisarja Piebalgsa v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Piebalgs on behalf of the Commission
(17. julij 2008)
(17 July 2008)
Dobro delovanje notranjega energetskega trga EU je glavni cilj ukrepov Komisije.
A proper functioning of the EU internal market of energy is a major goal of the Commission's action.
Glede na situacijo na madžarskem energetskem trgu lahko dolgoročne nakupne pogodbe in prednostne pravice na nekaterih čezmejnih delih madžarskega električnega omrežja resno ogrozijo razvoj konkurenčnega in stabilnega energetskega trga.
With regards to the situation on the Hungarian electricity market, the presence of long-term power purchase agreements and the existence of priority reservations rights on certain cross-border sections of the Hungarian transmission system can potentially seriously hinder the development of a competitive and robust electricity market.
V zvezi z domačimi madžarskimi energetskimi zmogljivostmi je Komisija konec decembra 2008 po temeljiti preiskavi od Madžarske zahtevala dolgoročne pogodbe o nakupu električne energije, saj le-te pomenijo nezakonito in nezdružljivo državno pomoč za proizvajalce električne energije.
As far as domestic generation capacities in Hungary are concerned, the Commission has requested from Hungary, following an in-depth investigation, to end by December 2008, long-term power purchase agreements for electricity because they constitute unlawful and incompatible state aid to the power generators.
Madžarska mora hkrati vrniti pomoč, ki jo je proizvajalcem električne energije dodelila od pristopa Madžarske k EU.
Hungary must at the same time recover the aid granted to the generators concerned since Hungary's EU accession.
Poleg tega je Komisija v dopisu z dne 18. oktobra 2006 madžarske organe obvestila, da ima pomisleke glede učinkovitega izvajanja Direktive št. 2003/54/ES Direktiva 2003/54/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. junija 1996 o skupnih pravilih notranjega trga z električno energijo, UL L 176, 15.7.2003 . , kar zadeva nediskriminatoren dostop do omrežja.
In addition, by letter of 18 October 2006, the Commission informed the Hungarian authorities about its concerns regarding the effective implementation of Directive 2003/54/EC Directive 2003/54/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity, OJ L 176, 15.7.2003. in relation to non-discriminatory access to the transmission system.
Ker madžarski organi niso zadostno dokazali, da se navedena direktiva ustrezno uporablja, je Komisija na Republiko Madžarsko 8. maja 2008 naslovila obrazloženo mnenje.
Since the Hungarian authorities could not satisfactorily demonstrate the proper application of the directive mentioned, the Commission sent a reasoned opinion to the Republic of Hungary on 8 May 2008.
Madžarski organi morajo v dveh mesecih sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, s katerimi bodo zagotovili nediskriminatoren dostop do čezmejnih omrežnih zmogljivosti.
The Hungarian authorities have two months to take necessary measures in order to enable non-discriminatory access to cross-border transport capacities.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-3049/08
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3049/08
Zadeva: Liberalizacija trga z električno energijo v Bolgariji
Subject: Liberalisation of the electricity market in Bulgaria
Prepoved, ki je začela veljati januarja 2008 in trajala do konca marca 2008 oz. do preklica, je energetskim podjetjem onemogočila nemoteno delovanje, preprečila konkurenčnost na trgu in je bila v nasprotju z načeli liberalizacije trga z električno energijo.
That ban, which entered into force in January 2008 and lasted until it was lifted at the end of March 2008, disrupted the operations of energy companies, prevented competition in the market and was contrary to the principles underlying the liberalisation of the electricity market.
Kako je ukrepala Evropska komisija v navedem primeru omejitve trgovanja z električno energijo?
What action did the Commission take as a result of this restriction on electricity trading?