natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zahteva, da zakonodajni predlog Komisije onemogoči kakršen koli izvoz sladkorja iz tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo, ki bi bil izveden v okviru tristranske trgovine prek manj razvitih držav;
calls for the Commission's legislative proposal to make it impossible to export any sugar from non-member countries to the European Union through triangular trade via the least developed countries;
zahteva, da proizvodnja uvoženega sladkorja ustreza tako socialno-ekonomskim merilom kot proizvodnji sladkorja v EU; v primeru, če države dobaviteljice ne spoštujejo teh meril, predlaga davek na uvožen sladkor, s katerim se bo polnil sklad Skupnosti, namenjen spodbujanju kmetijstva, ki spoštuje človeka in okolje, v državah v razvoju, ki dobavljajo sladkor.
Calls for the production of imported sugar to be subject to the same social and environmental standards as production of sugar in the EU; in the event that the supplier countries fail to comply with those standards, calls for the imposition of a levy on the imported sugar, which should be channelled into a new EU fund to promote humane and environment-friendly agriculture in the sugar-supplying developing countries;
poziva Komisijo, da takoj določi kvote za države Zahodnega Balkana, izračunane na podlagi že uveljavljenih zgodovinskih referenc, in sicer tako, da te kvote ne presegajo čistih sredstev proizvodnje in nacionalne porabe in zato ne omogočajo ponovnega izvoza v EU;
Calls on the Commission to establish quotas for the West Balkan countries without delay, and based on duly confirmed historical data, in a way which ensures that these quotas will not overrun the net balance of domestic production and consumption, and, consequently, will not allow them to re-export sugar to the EU;
poziva Komisijo, da izboljša uveljavljen sistem nadzora za zagotavljanje spoštovanja pravil o poreklu, zlasti v zvezi z dejstvom, da razširjen dostop do evropskega trga v skladu z režimom „vse, razen orožja“ (EBA) pomeni tveganje za razmik med cenami, ki bi spodbujal goljufije;
Calls on the Commission to improve the control systems put in place to verify whether the rules of origin are respected, especially since the increased access to the European market through the EBA-scheme may create price differences which could incite fraudulent practices;
poziva Komisija, da predloži ustrezne ukrepe, namenjene pomoči državam AKP, zelo odvisnim o izvoza sladkorja v EU, ki bi diverzificirali njihov gospodarski sistem;
Calls on the Commission to propose proper measures to assist ACP countries depending heavily on sugar exports to the EU in diversifying their economic base;
zahteva zagotovilo Komisije, da stališče Evropske unije pri pogajanjih v okviru STO vključuje trenutno reformo, da prihodnje večstranske obveznosti ne bodo vpeljale nove reforme, ki bi povzročila, da bi proizvajalci plačevali dvakrat;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the current reform is built into European Union's position in the WTO negotiations so that future multilateral commitments do not require further reform, which would result in producers having to pay twice;
prosi Komisijo, da še zlasti upošteva posledice reforme v Braziliji, državi, kjer sta proizvodnja in predelava sladkorja v rokah majhne skupine oseb, v škodo številnih delavcev na plantažah in v tovarnah; ocenjuje, da je EU moralno odgovorna za nadzor nad tem, da reforma ne daje prednosti netrajni proizvodnji sladkorja, ki se odvija v Braziliji;
Urges the Commission to take into consideration the impact of the reform in particular in Brazil, where sugar production and processing is controlled by a small number of individuals, to the detriment of the many who work in the sugar fields and factories; considers that the EU has a moral responsibility to ensure that its reforms do not facilitate the unsustainable latifundary method of sugar production as practised in Brazil;
poziva Komisijo, da se pogaja o vključevanju reforme o skupni evropski organizaciji trga sladkorja v podobne reforme organizacije trga sladkorja, ki se izvajajo v drugih državah, na prvem mestu v Združenih državah Amerike;
Calls on the Commission to negotiate coupling of the reform of the European common organisation of the market in sugar to similar reforms of the sugar market organisation in other countries, predominantly the United States of America;
poziva Komisijo, da pripravi vse potrebno za sklenitev mednarodnih sporazumov za nadzor nad ceno sladkorja, v okviru STO;
Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to reach international agreements within the WTO framework on the control of sugar production and sugar prices;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji in Svetu.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission and the Council.
za zaključek razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
to wind up the debate on the statements by the Council and Commission
v skladu s členom 103 Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlaga konferenca predsednikov
by the Conference of Presidents
o vmesni reviziji lizbonske strategije
on the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o vmesni reviziji lizbonske strategije
European Parliament resolution on the mid-term review of the Lisbon Strategy
ob upoštevanju člena 103 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 103 of its Rules of Procedure,
izraža prepričanje, da lahko Evropska unija v okviru globalnega cilja trajnostnega razvoja postane nosilec gospodarskega, družbenega in okoljskega napredka v svetu; ponovno izpostavlja veljavnost strateških ciljev, opredeljenih na zasedanjih Evropskega sveta v Lizboni in Göteborgu, za pospeševanje zaposlovanja, gospodarske reforme, spodbujanja konkurenčnosti, dokončnega oblikovanja notranjega trga, socialne kohezije in varstva okolja kot gibal stabilnega gospodarstva, osredotočenega na rasti; meni, da mora biti lizbonska strategija najpomembnejša prednostna naloga EU v naslednjih petih letih;
Believes firmly that the European Union, in the context of the global objective of sustainable development, can be a beacon of economic, social and environmental progress in the world; reaffirms the validity of the strategic goals set by the Lisbon and Gothenburg European Councils for strengthening employment, economic reform, enhancing competitiveness, completing the internal market, social cohesion and environmental protection, as engines of a sustainable growth-oriented economy; and believes that the Lisbon Strategy should be the EU's top priority for the next five years;
poudarja svojo zavezanost lizbonski strategiji in njeni viziji dinamičnega gospodarstva in boljše družbe z višjimi življenjskimi standardi kot temelja za pospeševanje rasti in zaposlovanja in posledično okvira za socialno kohezijo in okoljsko politiko; meni, da trajnostna rast in zaposlovanje predstavljata najbolj nujna cilja za Evropo ter sta temelj družbenega in okoljskega napredka; poudarja, da močne in dobro načrtovane socialne in okoljske politike predstavljajo bistveni element za okrepitev evropske gospodarske učinkovitosti;
Confirms its commitment to the Lisbon Strategy and the vision it sets out for a dynamic economy and a better society with a higher quality of life, to enhance growth and employment, thus creating a framework for social cohesion and environmental policy; believes that sustainable growth and employment are Europe's most pressing goals and underpin social and environmental progress; insists that well-designed social and environmental policies are themselves key elements in strengthening Europe's economic performance;
ugotavlja, da prost pretok blaga že uspešno deluje, medtem ko notranji trg še vedno ni izoblikovan in bodo potrebna večja prizadevanja za njegovo dokončno vzpostavitev;
Recognises that, while the free movement of goods is already functioning well, the internal market is still far from being complete and that therefore stronger efforts need to be made to finalise the internal market;
meni, da je za uspeh lizbonskih ciljev potrebno, da se države članice soočijo s strukturnimi reformami, potrebnimi za ohranitev evropskega socialnega modela; meni, da je za uspeh potreben tudi makroekonomski okvir, ki podpira rast, in da mora ta okvir združiti stabilnost s spodbudami za naložbe iz okvira lizbonskih ciljev;
Considers that the success of the Lisbon agenda requires Member States to face up to the structural reforms necessary to preserve the European Social Model; considers that it also needs a macro-economic framework supportive of growth, and that this framework must combine stability with incentives to invest in the Lisbon goals;
priznava ne eni strani pozitivni prispevek okoljske politike pri rasti in zaposlovanju zlasti z razvojem ekoloških inovacij, na drugi strani pa ugotavlja, da je nujno, da se EU odzove na izzive v zvezi z naravnimi viri in okoljem, kot so npr. podnebne spremembe in upadanje biološke raznovrstnosti, ki bodo imeli neposredne finančne in druge posledice za lizbonske cilje glede rasti, če se z njimi ne bomo spopadli nemudoma; meni torej, da je v pregledani lizbonski proces potrebno vključiti razmišljanja v zvezi z okoljem; vztraja, da bodo trdne politike na področju okolja, zdravja in varnosti hrane imele pozitiven učinek na rast in konkurenčnost;
Acknowledges, firstly, the positive environmental policy contribution to growth and employment through, in particular, the development of eco-innovations, and acknowledges, secondly, that the EU must take up a number of challenges concerning natural resources and the environment, such as climate change and diminishing biodiversity, which, if account is not taken of them immediately, will entail costs and have direct consequences for the Lisbon growth objectives; believes therefore that it is necessary to incorporate environmental considerations into the revised Lisbon process; insists that sound environmental, health and food safety policies will have a positive impact on growth and competitiveness;
izraža prepričanje, da je po zgledu Komisije za oživitev lizbonske strategije bistvenega pomena premagati neuspešno doseganje ciljev, zastavljenih marca 2000, in postaviti lizbonsko strategijo v središče nacionalne in evropske razprave; meni, da je to odvisno od:
Believes, as the Commission does, that to revitalise the Lisbon Strategy it is essential to address the failure of living up to the goals set in March 2000 and to make the Lisbon Strategy a central part of national as well as European debate; believes that this in turn depends upon:
- učinkovitejšega izpostavljanja prednostnih nalog z jasno opredeljivimi prednostnimi ukrepi na vseh treh področjih lizbonske strategije, kar naj pripomore k izostritvi trenutne razpršenosti lizbonskega procesa;
- a more effective prioritisation with identifiable priority actions in all three strands of the Lisbon Agenda, in order to obtain a clearer focus to correct the diffuse orientation of the Lisbon process;
- privlačne, jasno posredovane vizije, ki bi omogočila mobilizacijo evropskega prebivalstva;
- an attractive, well communicated vision around which one can mobilise the European public;
- bolj odprtega in preglednega procesa odločanja in izvajanja, ki bo spodbudil demokratično odgovornost in bi ga poslanci in državljani na nacionalni in evropski ravni lahko prevzeli za svojega;
- more open and transparent policy-making and implementation, in order to enhance democratic accountability and give ownership to Parliamentarians and citizens at both national and European level;
- nacionalnih in evropskih proračunskih sredstev, namenjenih konkretni izvedbi zastavljenih ciljev;
- the national and European budget resources necessary to give tangible expression to the objectives set;
izraža prepričanje, da mora pomladanski vrh EU lizbonsko strategijo opredeliti tako, da se bo osredotočila na doseganje ključnih ciljev, in sicer spodbujanje rasti in ustvarjanje delovnih mest z ukrepi, potrebnimi za vzpostavitev na znanju temelječe družbe; spodbujanje javnih in zasebnih naložb v lizbonske cilje, ustvarjanje poslovno prijaznega okolja, socialna politika, temelječa na vključenosti, varnosti, solidarnosti in prilagodljivosti ter oblikovanje evropske okoljske politike kot vira konkurenčnosti;
Believes that the Spring Summit should focus the Lisbon Strategy on key objectives to create growth and jobs, through actions for a knowledge-based society; promoting private and public investment in the Lisbon goals, promoting a business-friendly environment, a social policy based on inclusion, security, solidarity and adaptability and making Europe's environmental policy a source of competitive edge;
meni, da so gospodarski in družbeni cilje dosegljivi le, če se ohrani mednarodna konkurenčnost, če postaneta gospodarstvo in še posebej trg delovne sile prilagodljiva, če vlada monetarna stabilnost, če so vladne finance omejene na raven, ki ne ogroža niti monetarne stabilnosti niti trajnosti pokojnin, če se spodbuja podjetništvo, kulturo tveganja in osebne pobude, če ostanejo gospodarski predpisi obvladljivi in ne začnejo ovirati gospodarstva, če je davčni sistem enostaven, pošten in nalaga kar se da majhno davčno breme, ter če se zagotovi dosledna gospodarska politika;
Is of the opinion that economic and social objectives can only be realised if international competitiveness is maintained, the economy and in particular the labour market are made flexible, there is monetary stability, government finances are restricted to a level which jeopardises neither monetary stability nor the sustainability of pensions, entrepreneurship, a risk-taking culture and personal initiative are encouraged, the regulatory regime for the economy remains manageable and does not hamper the economy, the taxation system is straightforward and fair with as low a burden as possible, and a high degree of economic policy consistency is guaranteed;
poudarja, da je za oblikovanje široke koalicije, naklonjene spremembam, potrebno vsesplošno razumevanje lizbonske strategije kot strategije, od katere bo veliko ljudi imelo koristi in katere razvoj temelji na sodelovanju vseh bistvenih socialno-ekonomskih dejavnikov; ki si prizadeva za vzpostavitev trga dela, ki bo spodbujal dinamičnost in varnost; ki si prizadeva za posodobitev - in ne oslabitev - socialne varnosti; ki na doseganje visokih socialnih in okoljskih standardov gleda kot na del evropskega konkurenčnega modela;
Insists that, in order to build a broad coalition for change, the Lisbon Strategy must be universally understood as a strategy whose benefits will be widely shared and developed in cooperation with all relevant socio-economic actors; which looks for labour markets which promote both dynamism and security; which seeks to modernise, but not to weaken, social security; and which sees high social and environmental standards as part of Europe's competitive model;
poudarja pomen, ki ga za konkurenčnost Evrope predstavlja oblikovanje enotnega trga na področju storitev, na katerem vlada ravnotežje med odprtimi trgi, javnimi storitvami in pravicami potrošnikov; poudarja pomembno vlogo storitev splošnega interesa pri spodbujanju socialnega vključevanja, ozemeljske kohezije in učinkovitejšega notranjega trga; poziva vrh, naj se zavzame za sprejetje pravnega okvira Skupnosti za storitve splošnega interesa in tako zagotovi njihovo kakovost in dostopnost vsem Evropejcem, pri čemer naj za storitve splošnega interesa velja načelo subsidiarnosti;
Emphasises the importance for Europe's competitiveness of achieving a single market in services, with a balance between market opening, public services and social and consumer rights; points up the role of services of general interest in promoting social integration, territorial cohesion and a more efficient internal market; invites the Summit to undertake to adopt a Community legal framework on services of general interest so as to guarantee the quality thereof and access to them for all Europeans, while applying the principle of subsidiarity to services of general interest;
ponovno poudarja, da visoko kakovostne, vsem dostopne in učinkovite javne storitve pomembno prispevajo h kakovosti življenja in socialni koheziji kot temeljnih ciljev lizbonske strategije; meni, da bi med lizbonske cilje morala spadati učinkovita izvedba ukrepov s področja javnih naročil;
Reiterates the contribution of high quality, universally available and efficiently delivered public services to the quality of life and social cohesion goals that underpin the Lisbon Strategy; considers that the effective implementation of public procurement measures should form part of the Lisbon goals;
meni, da je nujno potrebno nedvoumno priznati izredno pomembni prispevek malih in srednjih podjetij k doseganju ciljev lizbonske strategije; ugotavlja, da sektor malih in srednjih podjetij zagotavlja ne le največji delež delovnih mest v celotni EU, ampak se je poleg tega v tem sektorju v zadnjih nekaj letih odprlo največ novih delovnih mest; posledično zahteva še dodatne ukrepe za ustvarjanje prijaznejšega okolja za mala in srednja podjetja, kar pomeni zmanjševanje nepotrebnih birokratskih obremenitev in zagotavljanje lažjega dostopa do finančnih virov za naložbe;
Considers that the vital contribution of SMEs to the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy goals must be more explicitly recognised; notes that the SME sector not only represents the largest proportion of employment across the EU but has also in recent years created more new jobs than any other sector; therefore demands enhanced measures to create a more SME-friendly environment, avoiding unnecessary bureaucratic burdens, and ensuring better access to financial resources for investment;
meni, da bo bolj globalen način gospodarskega odločanja bistven za oblikovanje družbe, ki bo naklonjena spremembam; opozarja, da je Evropski svet v Bruslju vztrajal pri umestitvi visoke ravni socialne zaščite v središče lizbonske strategije; podpira poziv Evropskega sveta v Bruslju za okrepitev politike boja proti revščini in družbeni izključenosti ter poziva pomladanski vrh, da si zastavi visoke cilje na družbenem področju;
Believes that, to create a society which welcomes change, the role of a more inclusive style of economic decision-making will be crucial; recalls that the Brussels European Council insisted that a high level of social protection was central to the Lisbon Strategy; supports the Brussels European Council's call for the reinforcement of policies to combat poverty and social exclusion and asks for a commitment by the Spring Summit to an ambitious social agenda;
meni, da bi zadovoljiv dogovor o novi zakonodaji s področja kemičnih snovi (REACH) predstavljal jasen primer konkretnega udejanjanja lizbonske strategije, kjer bi se uravnoteženo izražali cilji s področja konkurence in okolja, sociale in javnega zdravja;
Considers that satisfactory agreement on new legislation for chemical substitutes (REACH) would provide a clear example of the Lisbon Strategy in action by balancing competitiveness and environmental, social and public health goals;
meni, da je konkurenčni energetski trg, temelječ na izbiri trajnostnih virov energije, eden od pogojev za konkurenčno in trajno evropsko gospodarstvo in poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga tretjo direktivo o liberalizaciji, s katero bi zagotovili enakovredne pogoje za vse dejavnike in vse oblike energije;
Considers a competitive energy market supporting sustainable energy choices as one of the conditions for a competitive and sustainable European economy and urges the Commission to come forward with a third Directive on liberalisation to ensure a level playing field between all actors and all forms of energy;
meni, da so kmetijski izdatki za razvoj podeželja bistven del lizbonske strategije, še posebej zaradi usposabljanja mladih kmetov, kar je posebnega pomena za nove države članice;
Considers Rural Development agricultural expenditure, especially in favour of training of young farmers, which is of particular importance in the new Member States, to be a crucial part of the Lisbon strategy;
meni, da mora vmesna revizija dati primerno težo prispevku, ki ga lahko okoljske tehnologije in visoki okoljski standardi doprinesejo k oblikovanju zmagovalne strategije konkurenčnosti; poziva k večji podpori ekološkim tehnologijam in ekološko učinkovitim inovacijam; širše gledano, poudarja pomen kakovosti življenja kot dejavnika pri naložbah in lokaciji industrije; meni, da bi namerno neupoštevanje podnebnih sprememb in izgube biotske raznovrstnosti resno škodilo doseganju zastavljenih ciljev;
Believes that the mid-term review should give due weight to the contribution that environmental technologies and high environmental standards can make to a winning competitive strategy; calls for increased support for eco-technologies and eco-efficient innovations; more broadly, underlines the role of quality of life as a factor in investment and industrial location; believes that ignoring climate change and loss of bio-diversity will seriously harm the ability to achieve these goals;
poziva Komisijo, naj nudi močan zgled s predlaganjem strategij, ki omogočajo izboljšanje delovanja trga delovne sile, pripravljajo našo mladino na prihodnji razvoj in izboljšujejo njihove možnosti na področju priznavanja diplom, izobraževanja v tujini ter poklicnih priložnosti, ob spoštovanju načela solidarnosti med generacijami in upoštevanju demografskih razmer; skladno s tem podpira evropsko pobudo za mlade, ki jo je predlagala vrsta držav članic in ki je vključena v sporočilo Komisije pomladnemu Evropskemu svetu; poziva k izboljšanju prilagodljivosti trga delovne sile in tako boljših možnosti za večje zaposlovanje, s posebnim ozirom na majhna in srednja podjetja;
Calls on the Commission to offer strong leadership in proposing strategies to improve the functioning of labour markets, to ascertain future changes for our youth, improving the opportunities for youth in the area of recognition of diplomas, cross-border education and professional opportunities, respecting the principles of solidarity between generations and compatible with the demographic situation; accordingly encourages a European initiative for youth, proposed by a number of Member States, which is included in the Commission communication to the Spring European Council; calls for enhancing the flexibility of labour markets, thereby increasing the opportunity to bring more people into jobs, with special focus on SMEs;
poziva k preferencialnemu obravnavanju ukrepov, ki olajšujejo čezmejno izmenjavo raziskovalcev;
Calls for preferential treatment of measures facilitating the cross-border exchange of researchers;
meni, da je evropska odličnost v ekonomiji znanja odvisna od visoko izobražene in usposobljene delovne sile ter od občutne širitve področij in povečanja učinkovitosti raziskav ter inovacij; meni, da je visoko kakovostno izobraževanje, dostopno vsem, bistvenega pomena za močno gospodarstvo in pravično družbo; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj aktivno podprejo znanstvene raziskave na vseh stopnjah inovativnega procesa od razvoja zamisli do njene izvedbe na ravni podjetij;
Believes that European excellence in the knowledge economy depends on the creation of a well educated and highly trained workforce and on a big increase in the scale and effectiveness of research and innovation; insists that high quality education, accessible to all, is essential to a strong economy and to a just society; calls on the Commission and the Member States to actively support scientific research during all stages of the innovation process from developing an idea to implementation at enterprise level;
poziva, da vmesna revizija postavi izobraževanje in usposabljanje kot dejavnik izboljšanja človeškega kapitala in vseživljenjskega učenja v središče lizbonske strategije ter meni, da mora pomladanski vrh EU opredeliti ambiciozne cilje;
Calls for the mid-term review to put education and training, improving human capital and lifelong learning at the heart of the Lisbon Strategy and considers that the Spring Summit should set ambitious targets;