natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi se razlikam, ki obstajajo med državami članicami v zvezi z razlago pojmov "evropsko delo" in "neodvisni proizvajalec" lahko izognili, če bi Komisija v okviru pregleda direktive poskrbela za natančnejšo opredelitev pojmov "evropsko delo", "neodvisni proizvajalec" in "specializirana veriga"; poleg tega ocenjuje, da bi to prispevalo k večji pravni varnosti pri uporabi direktive;
Believes that the differing interpretations among Member States of the concepts of "European work" and "independent producer" could be avoided if the Commission, in the context of the revision of the Directive, gave a more precise definition of the concepts of "independent producer", "European work" and "thematic' channel"; considers also that this would offer greater legal certainty in the application of the Directive;
ugotavlja, da so kvote za "evropska dela" v večji meri zapolnjene z nacionalnimi deli, in zagovarja prostovoljne pobude povečevanja kvot nenacionalnih evropskih del;
Notes that the quotas for "European works" are mainly filled by national works and supports voluntary initiatives for further quotas for non-national European works;
poudarja, kako pomembna je krepitev programa MEDIA, katerega nastanek in podaljšanje imata za cilj pomoč neodvisnim producentom ter majhnim in srednje velikim podjetjem;
Stresses the importance of strengthening the MEDIA programme, pointing out that the objective behind its inception and its renewal is, and should continue to be, to support independent producers and small and medium-sized enterprises;
poudarja pomen krepitve tega programa kot osnovnega instrumenta evropske avdiovizualne politike za strokovno izobraževanje in pomoč pri distribuciji, radiodifuziji in kroženju kinematografskih del; spodbuja države članice, da odprejo njihove izobraževalne sisteme za znanje o evropski kinematografski dediščini, jezikih, kulturah, čutu za lepoto ter o zgodovini in izkušnjah evropskih narodov;
Stresses the importance of strengthening this programme as an essential tool of European audiovisual policy for professional training and support for the distribution, broadcasting and movement of cinematographic works; encourages the Member States to open up their educational systems to a knowledge of the European film heritage, the languages, cultures, tastes, histories and experiences of the peoples of Europe;
opozarja na pomen pretoka evropskih del, evropskih koprodukcij in skupnih tržnih strategij; ugotavlja, da producenti iz ZDA bolje izkoriščajo evropski avdiovizualen prostor kot Evropejci sami, čeprav Evropejci producirajo več dokumentarnih in umetniških oddaj, kar je posledica pomanjkanja evropske integrirane in globalizirane industrije; ocenjuje, da bi neravnovesje v razširjanju avdiovizualnih del lahko ogrozilo kulturno raznolikost;
Recalls the importance, for the movement of European works, of European co-productions and common marketing strategies; notes that the European audiovisual space is better exploited by United States producers than by Europeans themselves – even though Europeans produce more documentaries and fiction – owing to the lack of an integrated and globalised European industry; considers that the imbalance in the movement of audiovisual works could jeopardise cultural diversity;
ocenjuje, da se morajo evropska prizadevanja veliko bolj kot k produkciji usmeriti k promociji, da bo evropska avdiovizualna industrija lahko tekmovala s tisto iz ZDA;
Considers that, to enable the European audiovisual industry to compete with the United States industry, European efforts should be geared much more towards promotion;
opozarja Komisijo, da je zaradi vdora produkcijskih skupin na evropske trge nujno treba pospeševati podporo evropski enkratni vsebini in njen razvoj z vzpostavljanjem vezi s sredstvi financiranja;
Draws the Commission's attention to the fact that, in the face of the onslaught by production groups on European markets, it seems essential to encourage aid for uniquely European content and to develop such content by establishing a link with sources of finance;
poudarja, da je prednostna naloga vzpostavitev metod kakovostne analize v zvezi s kulturnimi vsebinami evropske avdiovizualne produkcije in opozarja na pomen okvirnega programa RTR;
Stresses that methods of qualitative analysis must be established as a matter of priority covering the cultural content of European audiovisual production and recalls the importance of the RTD Framework Programme;
Pregled direktive
Revision of the Directive
poudarja, da avdiovizualni sektor prispeva k tehnološkim inovacijam, gospodarskemu razvoju in ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest; meni, da je tudi pomemben instrument za delovanje notranjega trga; meni, da ima prav tako ključno vlogo pri delovanju demokracije, če prevladujejo različni prispevki in mnenja, kulturna pluralnost in raznolikost; meni, da je prav za ohranjanje teh demokratičnih vrednot in svobode izražanja ter mnenja državljanov treba zakonsko urediti zaščito časti, zasebnega življenja in samopodobe;
Stresses that the audiovisual sector contributes to technological innovation, economic growth and job creation; considers it also to be an important instrument for the functioning of the single market; believes that it is also of critical importance to the functioning of democracy, provided there is diversity of input and opinion, pluralism and cultural diversity; considers that, precisely in order to maintain such democratic values and freedom of expression and opinion, measures are needed to regulate the protection of the right to one's own image;
zagovarja, da mora evropski avdiovizualni model temeljiti na ravnovesju med močnim, neodvisnim in pluralističnim javnim sektorjem ter dinamičnim in enako pluralističnim gospodarskim sektorjem, ki oba posredno ali neposredno prispevata k odpiranju delovnih mest; ocenjuje, da je nadaljnji obstoj tega modela nujen za vitalnost in kakovost ustvarjanja ter potrebuje zakonodajni okvir za zagotavljanje spoštovanja pravic Evropejcev;
Asserts that the European audiovisual model must be founded on a balance between a strong, independent and pluralistic public service sector and a dynamic and equally pluralistic commercial sector, both of which are directly and indirectly creators of jobs; considers that the continued existence of this model is essential to the vitality and quality of creative work and requires a legislative framework to ensure respect for the rights of Europeans;
poudarja, da je splošni dostop javnosti do visoko kvalitetnih in raznovrstnih vsebin še bolj pomemben glede na tehnološke spremembe v vedno bolj konkurenčnem in globaliziranem okolju; meni, da so storitve javne radiodifuzije bistvene za oblikovanje mnenja na demokratičen način ter da omogočajo obstoj in spoznavanje kulturne raznolikosti ter da morajo imeti enake možnosti pri dostopanju do trga, vključno s storitvami novih medijev;
Stresses that universal public access to high-quality and diverse content is becoming ever more crucial against a background of technological change and increased concentration in an ever more competitive and globalised environment; considers that public broadcasting services are essential in forming opinion in a democratic manner and allowing people to experience and familiarise themselves with cultural diversity, and that such services must have equal opportunities of priority access to the market, including in new media services;
ocenjuje, da je potreben pregled direktive, da se odgovori na strukturne spremembe; meni, da to ne sme ogrožati temeljnih načel direktive – prosto razširjanje evropskih oddaj, prosti dostop do pomembnih dogodkov, promocija evropskih del in novejših samostojnih produkcij, zaščita mladoletnikov in javnega reda, varstvo potrošnikov, pravica do odgovora – ampak ta načela prilagoditi novim izzivom, ne da bi pri tem pozabili na potrebo sektorja po gospodarski vitalnosti in kakovosti;
Considers that the Directive needs to be revised in order to tackle structural changes; considers that such a revision must not call into question the fundamental principles of the Directive – free movement of European broadcasts, free access to major events, promotion of European works and recent independent productions, protection of minors and public policy, consumer protection, right of reply – but rather must adapt them to the new challenges without losing sight of the need for quality and economic vitality in the sector;
priporoča vključitev zaščitne klavzule, s katero bi izrecno vzpostavili spoštovanje pristojnosti držav članic na področju kulture in medijev;
Recommends that a safeguard clause be included expressly to establish respect for Member States" competence in the fields of culture and the media;
ocenjuje, da mora pregled direktive zagotoviti razvoj novih tehnologij in novih storitev za zagotavljanje rasti evropskega gospodarstva v skladu z Lizbonsko strategijo;
Considers that the revision of the Directive should ensure the development of new technologies and new services, in order to secure the growth of the European economy in accordance with the Lisbon strategy;
ugotavlja, da Komisija že več let vodi javna posvetovanja o novi direktivi, ki jo namerava predstaviti konec leta 2005; ugotavlja, da bo britansko predsedstvo Sveta organiziralo konferenco v Liverpoolu o pregledu direktive; poziva, da je Parlament vključen v vse stopnje postopka;
Notes that the Commission has for some years been conducting a public consultation around a new directive which it intends to present at the end of 2005; notes that the British Presidency of the Council will be holding a conference in Liverpool on the revision of the Directive; calls for Parliament to be fully involved in all stages of the proceedings;
se boji, da dajeta, v primeru tako pomembne teme, razprava in posvetovanja prednost gospodarskim presojam in medvladnim odnosom; se zaveda, da sam trg ne bo rešil težav in da morajo institucije ponujati odgovore na zaskrbljenost Evropejcev v zvezi s kulturnimi vsebinami televizije;
Fears that, on such an important subject, the debate and consultation will give preference to economic considerations and inter-governmental relations; is aware that the market alone will not resolve the problems and that the institutions must respond to the concerns of Europeans about the cultural content of television;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da bodo neodvisni producenti lahko ohranili pravice, vezane na njihove produkcije, in da se jim zagotovi lažjo zaščito pravic intelektualne lastnine, s čimer bi se povečale njihove možnosti za pritegnitev zasebnih vlaganj;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that independent producers are in a position to retain the rights in their productions and make it easier for them to uphold their intellectual property rights so as to improve their ability to attract private investment;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pritiskov, ki se izvajajo, da bi omilil sektorske predpise, in opozarja, da direktiva vzpostavlja osnovne norme, katerim ni uspelo preprečiti poslabšanja kvalitete programov;
Is concerned about the pressure to reduce regulation in this sector and recalls that the Directive establishes minimum standards which have not succeeded in preventing a deterioration in the quality of programmes;
upošteva vlogo oglaševanja pri financiranju nekaterih televizijskih kanalov, ki so v splošnem interesu, in njihov vpliv na razporejanje; kljub temu poudarja, da je uporaba členov v zvezi z omejevanjem oddajnega časa, posvečenega oglaševanju, v nekaterih državah, še vedno nezadostna, tako da je postalo težko zagotavljati strogo ločevanje med oglaševanjem in izdajateljsko vsebino, kar škodi kulturni celovitosti del;
Notes the role of advertising in the funding of certain general-interest TV channels and its effect on scheduling; notes however that in some countries there remain such serious shortcomings in the application of the articles restricting the duration of advertisements that it has become difficult to maintain strict separation between advertising and editorial content, to the detriment of the cultural integrity of the works;
poudarja potrebo po jasni opredelitvi vsebine in predpisov o oglaševanju, zlasti tistega v zvezi z alkoholom, katerega vpliv je zlasti škodljiv za otroke in ranljive osebe; opozarja, da mora zaščita mladoletnikov ostati prednostni cilj avdiovizualne politike in temeljno načelo, za katerega je zaželeno, da se razširi na vse avdiovizualne storitve, ki so na voljo javnosti;
Underlines the need to define clearly the content and regulation of advertising, in particular that relating to alcohol, which has a particularly harmful effect on children and vulnerable people; recalls that the protection of minors must remain a priority objective of audiovisual policy and a fundamental principle which ought to be extended to all audiovisual services made available to the public;
zato vztraja, da se ohranijo pravila za omejevanje možnosti prekinitev predvajanj avdiovizualnih del z oglaševanjem;
Emphasises, therefore, the need to preserve the rules limiting the opportunities for advertisement breaks during audiovisual works;
poudarja, da mora pregled direktive omogočati določanje pravnih obveznosti in trdne politične volje, da se zagotovi ostra ločitev med izdajateljsko in umetniško vsebino na eni ter trgovsko ponudbo na drugi strani;
Stresses that the revision of the Directive must make it possible to lay down legal obligations and set out a firm political will to ensure strict separation between editorial and artistic content on the one hand and commercial promotion on the other;
poziva, da naj pregledana direktiva državam članicam in njihovim pristojnim organom naloži učinkovitejše mehanizme za spoštovanje in spremljanje zakonodaje ter uporabo predvidenih sankcij, zlasti na področju kvot in oglaševanja;
Calls for the revised Directive to impose on Member States and their competent authorities more effective mechanisms to ensure the observance and monitoring of the legislation and the imposition of the sanctions provided for, particularly as regards quotas and advertising;
ugotavlja, da sta digitalizacija in interaktivnost priložnost tako za industrijo kakor tudi za potrošnike, vendar da večja izbira ne pomeni nujno večje kakovosti in količine evropskih del; opozarja na nevarnost, da se lahko oblikuje avdiovizualni sektor, ki se ne bo enakomerno razvijal;
Notes that digitisation and interactivity represent opportunities both for the industry and for consumers, but that more choice does not necessarily equate with better quality or a greater proportion of European works; notes the risk of a two-speed audiovisual sector emerging;
poudarja, da so se pojavile nove oblike televizije, kot so, na primer, televizija prek omrežij ADSL, televizija prek interneta in prek mobilnih telefonov; meni, da bi z namenom preprečevanja izkrivljanja konkurence med različnimi oblikami televizije, ki so danes na voljo, morali razjasniti uporabo direktive za te nove oblike televizije ob njenem pregledu;
Observes that new forms of television have been introduced, for example television via ADSL networks, via the Internet and via mobile phone; considers that, in order to avoid any distortion of competition between the different forms of television available today, the application of the Directive to these new forms of television should be clarified as part of the revision process;
ugotavlja, da razširitev področja uporabe direktive ne sme ogroziti krepitve evropskega modela, ki temelji na prostem pretoku, kakovosti, javnih storitvah, splošnemu interesu in spoštovanju evropskih vrednot;
Notes that extending the scope of the Directive should not prevent the strengthening of the European model founded on freedom of movement, high quality, public service, the general interest and respect for European values;
poudarja potrebo po čimbolj neodvisni evropski zakonodaji od avdiovizualnih tehnologij; poziva, da ta zakonodaja jasno določi, da lahko ponudniki javnih storitev lahko uporabljajo vse nove tehnologije in nove oblike medijev, kot so internet in storitve WAP, na način, da se ne kršijo pravila notranjega trga;
Stresses the need for European legislation to be so far as possible independent of audiovisual technology; calls for such legislation to state clearly that public service providers may make use of all new technologies and new media, such as the Internet and WAP services, without thereby infringing the rules of the internal market;
pozdravlja, ob upoštevanju novih tehnoloških razvojev, kot je napredek na področju konvergence in digitalizacije, predloga Komisije v zvezi s pregledom direktive glede predloga za razširitev njenega področja uporabe, da bi ta zajemal vse storitve, ki temeljijo na načelu stopnjevanja regulacije;
Welcomes, in the light of technological developments (such as growing convergence and digitisation), the Commission's announcement, in connection with the revision of the Directive, of a proposal to broaden its scope to cover all services based on the principle of a graduated form of regulation;
meni, da bi morala v primeru razširitve področja uporabe na nove storitve, direktiva zagotoviti, da tudi za te storitve velja načelo razširjanja evropskih del in samostojnih evropskih produkcij; se zaveda, da mehanizmi iz členov 4 in 5 za tradicionalne storitve niso prilagojeni novim storitvam, zato poziva Komisijo, da določi obveznost vlaganj (produkcija ali nakup), ponudbo evropskih vsebin in dostop do njih;
Considers that, if the scope of the Directive is extended to cover new services, the Directive should ensure that these services, too, abide by the principles of promoting European works and independent European productions; is aware that the mechanisms provided for under Articles 4 and 5 relating to traditional services are not suited to the new services and calls on the Commission to lay down obligations relating to investment (production or purchase), to offering European content and to providing access to this content;
meni, da je za zagotavljanje kulturne raznolikosti treba določiti ukrepe za promocijo evropskih del za nove storitve, kot je, med drugim, video na zahtevo;
Considers that, in order to ensure cultural diversity, measures should be laid down to promote European works for new services, such as video on demand;
poudarja nujno potrebo, ob upoštevanju digitalne tehnologije, da se temeljito spremeni pristop, ki se je do sedaj uporabljal v pravu Skupnosti in je temeljil na razlikovanju med vsebino in "infrastrukturo";
Stresses the urgent need, in the light of digital technology, to make radical changes to the approach taken until now in Community legislation, based on a distinction between content and "infrastructure";
poudarja, da je treba, po eni strani, okrepiti nadzor nad ne-EU kanali, za katere so pristojne države članice v skladu s členom 2 direktive, ki predvajajo programe, ki spodbujajo rasno in versko sovraštvo, in, po drugi strani, izboljšati usklajevanje med državami članicami na tem področju;
Stresses the need both to reinforce the monitoring of non-EU channels under the jurisdiction of a Member State in accordance with Article 2 of the Directive which broadcast programmes inciting to racial and religious hatred, and to improve coordination between Member States in this area;
naproša Svet in Komisijo, da v okviru informacijske družbe oblikujeta in izvedeta programe za medijsko pismenost s ciljem spodbuditi aktivno in zavedno državljanstvo v Evropi;
Asks the Council and the Commission, within the framework of the information society, to develop and to implement media literacy programmes to promote active and aware citizenship in Europe;
poudarja pomen delovne skupine, ki združuje nacionalne zakonodajalce, in zahteva, da Parlament v tej skupini sodeluje kot opazovalec;
Stresses the importance of the working party of national regulators and calls for Parliament to be involved in it as an observer;
predlaga organizacijo evropskega leta avdiovizualnosti in medijev, ki bi združeval institucije, politične stranke, civilno družbo in avdiovizualni sektor, da se tako oblikuje "evropski inovacijski pakt ", ki bi zagotavljal ravnovesje med konkurenčnostjo, kakovostjo, kulturo in številčnostjo;
Proposes the holding of a European Audiovisual and Media Year, involving the institutions, political parties, civil society and the audiovisual sector, with a view to drawing up a "European Innovation Pact" guaranteeing a balance between competitiveness, high quality, culture and pluralism;
je vznemirjena zaradi teženj h koncentraciji – tako vodoravni kot vertikalni –medijev v nekaterih državah članicah, kar predstavlja nevarnost za demokracijo in tveganje za kulturno raznolikost ter kar bi lahko zaostrilo težnje k skrajni komercializaciji avdiovizualnega sektorja in pripeljalo do prevlade nekaterih nacionalnih izdelkov nad izdelki iz držav, katerih jezikovni prostor je ožji in proizvodnja manjša;
Is alarmed at the tendency towards (vertical and horizontal) concentration of the media in certain Member States, which poses a threat to democracy and a risk to cultural diversity and could accentuate tendencies towards the extreme commercialisation of the audiovisual sector and the hegemony of certain national products over those with narrower linguistic areas and smaller production;
poudarja, da je treba zaradi zagotavljanja pluralizma mnenja in raznolikosti pri distribuciji programov pri pripravi nacionalnih predpisov ali predpisov Skupnosti o digitalizaciji zagotoviti, da večina novih storitev digitalne distribucije ne postane odvisna od ali pod odločilnim vplivom velikih skupin multinacionalnih medijev, ki imajo na razpolago pomemben kapital – zlasti tistih, katerih interesi so zunaj Evropske unije;
Stresses that particular care should be paid, in order to ensure pluralism of opinion and diversity in programme distribution, to preventing, when drafting Community or national regulations on digital switchover, the majority of new digital distribution services from falling under the control or decisive influence of large, capital-rich, multinational media groups– particularly those with interests outside the EU;
poudarja, da v primerjavi s številčnostjo medijev konkurenčnost in pravo konkurence ne zadostujeta; meni, da pluralizem temelji na spoštovanju in spodbujanju različnih stališč v vseh medijih, priznavanju neodvisnosti izdajateljev, v javnem in v gospodarskem sektorju, ter na avtoriteti in neodvisnosti regulativnih organov;
Stresses that competition and competition law are not enough to ensure media pluralism; considers that pluralism is based on respect for and promotion of diversity of points of view across all media, through the recognition of editorial independence, both in the public and the commercial sectors, and through the authority and independence of the regulatory authorities;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vzorcev koncentracije oglaševanja v nekaterih državah članicah;
Is concerned about patterns of concentration of advertising in some Member States;
poudarja, da delitev evropskih avdiovizualnih trgov na nacionalne trge ne zmanjšuje tveganja koncentracije medijev na evropski ravni ter da je kršitev svobode izražanja in spoštovanja pluralnosti in raznolikosti, kar je posledica koncentracije medijev v eni od držav članic, dejavnik tveganja za institucionalni in demokratični red Skupnosti;
Stresses that the fragmentation of the European audiovisual markets into national markets does not reduce the risks of media concentration at European level, and that a violation of freedom of expression and respect for pluralism and diversity as a result of media concentration in a Member State also constitutes a risk factor for the Community institutional and democratic order;