natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva, naj se kot instrumentom, ki prispevajo k lizbonskim ciljem, več pozornosti posveti beli knjigi Komisije o mladini (2001) in evropskemu paktu za mlade Evropskega sveta (2005); meni, da bi morala Komisija pri pripravi zakonodajnih predlogov upoštevati in vključiti učinek na mlade in rezultate strukturiranega dialoga z mladinskimi organizacijami, države članice pa bi se morale osredotočiti na mlade pri izvajanju lizbonskih nacionalnih reformnih programov in upoštevati mlade na ustreznih političnih področjih; meni, da bi morala biti povečanje študentske mobilnosti in kakovost različnih izobraževalnih sistemov prednostna naloga v povezavi s ponovno opredelitvijo pomembnejših ciljev bolonjskega procesa leta 2010, na različnih področjih politike pa je treba sprejeti različne ukrepe; poudarja, da različni vidiki mobilnosti presegajo področje visokega šolstva, saj zadevajo socialne zadeve, finance ter priseljevanje in vizumsko politiko pri razvoju resničnega evropskega območja visokega izobraževanja;
Asks for more attention to be devoted to the Commission's White Paper on Youth (2001) and the European Council's European Youth Pact (2005) as one of the instruments contributing to the Lisbon objectives; considers that the Commission should consider and incorporate the impact on youth and the results of the structures dialogue with youth organisations when preparing legislative proposals and that Member States should focus on youth when implementing the Lisbon national reform programmes and take youth into account in the relevant policy fields; considers that an increase in student mobility and the quality of the different educational systems should be a priority in the context of redefining the major goals of the Bologna Process beyond 2010 and action must be taken across different policy areas; points out that various aspects of mobility go beyond the scope of higher education and concern the scope of social affairs, finance, and immigration and visa policies to develop a real European Area for Higher Education;
meni, da so „evropeizacija“ finančnih nadzornih struktur, učinkovita pravila o konkurenci, ustrezna regulacija in izboljšanje preglednosti finančnih trgov srednjeročno ključnega pomena pri izogibanju ponovitvi sedanje krize; meni, da bi povezan, celovit (ki pokriva vse finančne sektorje) in skladen nadzorni okvir, začenši z usklajenim pristopom do uravnavanja čezmejne porazdelitve finančnih tveganj, na podlagi usklajene zakonodaje zmanjšal stroške izpolnjevanja zahtev pri dejavnostih, ki sodijo pod različne pristojnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predloge za revizijo sedanje nadzorne strukture v skladu s temi načeli; poziva države članice, naj se ne glede na zgoraj omenjene ukrepe srednjeročno vrnejo k uravnoteženemu javnemu financiranju, in jih poziva, naj pojasnijo, na kakšen način bodo to dosegle;
Considers a 'Europeanisation' of the financial supervision structure, effective competition rules, appropriate regulation and improved transparency of the financial markets to be essential in the medium term to avoid a repetition of the current crisis; takes the view that an integrated, comprehensive (covering all financial sectors) and coherent supervisory framework, starting with a balanced approach in regulating the cross-border spread of financial risk on the basis of harmonised legislation, would decrease compliance costs in the case of multi-jurisdiction activities; calls on the Commission to put forward proposals for revising the existing supervisory architecture along those principles; calls on the Member States, notwithstanding the measures above, to return in the medium term to balanced public financing, and therefore calls on the Member States to clarify how they will be able to achieve this objective;
poziva države članice in Evropsko unijo, naj prilagodijo proračun EU in omogočijo uporabo neuporabljenih finančnih sredstev, da se podprejo cilji politik EU;
Calls on the PlaceNameplaceMemberPlaceType States and the European Union to adapt the EU budget and allow for the use of unused financial resources in order to support the policy goals of the EU;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vse več regionalnih razlik v zvezi s posledicami finančne krize, ki se med drugim odraža v vse večji razliki med vrednostmi kreditov držav članic, kar vodi do večjih stroškov posojil za tiste z nižjimi bonitetami; poziva k razvoju novih inovativnih finančnih instrumentov, da bi ublažili te učinke in privabili svež kapital;
Is concerned by the increasing regional differences with regard to the effects of the financial crisis, reflected inter alia in the increasing spread between the creditworthiness of Member States, leading to higher costs for loans for those with lower ratings; calls for the development of new innovative financial instruments in order to mitigate these effects and to attract fresh capital;
ugotavlja, da je treba evropske finančne instrumente uporabiti za podporo javni porabi; poudarja, da je treba za prispevek k oživitvi gospodarstva v Evropi pospešiti stopnjo in hitrost izvajanja teh finančnih instrumentov; meni, da je kohezijska politika EU odličen instrument za ozemeljsko solidarnost, zlasti za njene čezmejne elemente; je zelo zadovoljen z nedavno „lizbonizacijo“ kohezijske politike; meni, da bi bilo treba z ukrepi za usmerjanje regionalnih skladov bolj v smeri podjetništva, raziskav, inovacij, zaposlovanja in novih sposobnostih, zagotoviti razpoložljivost znatnih sredstev na lokalni ravni za okrepitev poslovnega potenciala in podporo najranljivejšim;
Notes that European funding instruments should be used to support public spending; points out that, in order to contribute to the economic recovery of Europe, the implementation rate and speed of these funding instruments needs to be accelerated; considers that the EU's cohesion policy is an excellent instrument of territorial solidarity, especially the trans-border components thereof; is very satisfied with the recent ‘Lisbonisation’ of the cohesion policy; considers that, through steps to direct regional funds more towards entrepreneurship, research, innovation, employment and new skills, considerable funds should become available at local level to enhance business potential and support the most vulnerable;
poudarja, da bi morali tudi programi vseevropskih prometnih omrežij in vseevropskih energetskih omrežij kar največ prispevati k načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva in k doseganju ciljev lizbonske strategije; meni, da so rezultati pozitivnih prizadevanj koordinatorjev in oblikovanja izvajalske agencije vseevropskega prometnega omrežja ter izvedbene zakonodaje za izboljšanje učinkovitosti somodalnosti številni v celoti pripravljeni projekti vseevropskega prometnega omrežja po celotni Evropski uniji za spodbujanje trajnostne rasti in boljše mobilnosti;
Points out that the TENs-T and TENs-E programmes should also make their full contribution both to the Recovery Plan and to the goals of the Lisbon Strategy; considers that the positive efforts of the coordinators as well as the setting-up of the TEN-T Executive Agency, together with the implementing legislation to improve the efficiency of co-modality, have resulted in a good number of fully ready TEN-T projects all over the European Union to boost sustainable growth and better mobility;
ugotavlja, da ima Evropska investicijska banka pomembno vlogo pri načrtu EU za oživitev gospodarstva; pozdravlja povečanje obsega kapitala, ki ga Evropski investicijski banki namenjajo države članice, da bi ta dala več posojil malim in srednje velikim podjetjem; vztraja, da morajo biti posojila tem podjetjem na voljo v vseh državah članicah na pregleden in pravičen način; poziva k dodatni okrepitvi vloge Evropske investicijske banke v zvezi z novimi inovativnimi finančnimi instrumenti;
Notes the essential role of the EIB with regard to the EU recovery plan; welcomes the increase in capital for the EIB from the Member States in order to issue more loans to SMEs; insists that loans are accessible to SMEs from all Member States, in a transparent and equitable manner; calls for a further strengthening of the role of the EIB with regard to new innovative financial instruments;
v zvezi z gospodarskim upravljanjem meni, da sedanja gospodarska kriza zahteva odločno, usklajeno in pravočasno posredovanje vseh držav članic ter regulativne ukrepe, da bi utrdili finančne trge in povrnili zaupanje; meni, da bi morali novi zakonodajni ukrepi temeljiti na načelih preglednosti in odgovornosti ter da je treba izvajati učinkovito nadzorovanje, da se varujejo pravice potrošnikov; meni, da bi morali novi predpisi vključevati zahteve proti pretirani uporabi finančnih vzvodov in za višje kapitalske rezerve bank; poleg tega opozarja na sedanje težave glede pravil vrednotenja in ocene tveganja; meni, da mora biti nadzor v koraku s finančnimi inovacijami, Evropa pa mora v zvezi s tem izboljšati strokovno znanje in izkušnje svojih regulativnih organov; meni, da več predpisov ne pomeni nujno, da so ti predpisi tudi boljši; meni, da morajo države članice usklajevati svoje regulativne ukrepe; meni, da je treba zaščititi stabilizacijske standarde in ureditev finančnega nadzora v evroobmočju;
Considers, with regard to economic governance, that the current economic crisis requires firm, coordinated and timely government intervention by all Member States, as well as regulatory measures in order to shore up financial markets and restore confidence; considers that new legislative measures should be based on the principles of transparency and accountability and that effective monitoring needs to be implemented so as to safeguard consumer's rights; considers that new regulation should include requirements against excessive leveraging and for higher capital reserves for banks; points, moreover, in this connection to the present problems relating to valuation rules and risk assessment; considers that controls need to keep up with financial innovations and that Europe should enhance the know-how of its regulatory bodies in this respect; considers that more regulation is not necessarily better regulation; considers that Member States must coordinate their regulatory actions; considers that stabilisation standards and regulation of the financial supervision in the eurozone must be safeguarded;
opozarja, da tudi bonitetne agencije nosijo svoj del odgovornosti za finančno krizo; pozdravlja poziv Evropskega sveta, da se pospeši zakonodajni predlog Komisije za zaostritev pravil o bonitetnih agencijah;
Recalls that credit rating agencies bear their share of responsibility for the financial crisis; welcomes the call by the European Council to speed up the Commission’s legislative proposal to tighten up the rules on rating agencies;
poziva Ekonomsko-finančni svet, naj do marca 2009 zaključi pregled direktive o davku na dodano vrednost, da se omogočijo zmanjšanje ravni tega davka za delovno intenzivne storitve in za storitve, za katere je potrebno veliko osebja, in drugi ustrezni ukrepi za spodbujanje domačega povpraševanja; poziva k usklajenim ukrepom in solidarnosti držav članic v zvezi s tem, in sicer tako, da se dopuščajo različne možnosti v sektorskem znižanju davka na dodano vrednost, ki so predvidene v direktivi o davku na dodano vrednost, ki jo države članice lahko izvajajo ali ne, v skladu s svojimi prednostnimi nalogami; meni, da bi morale selektivne davčne spodbude prek zmanjšanja obdavčitve kapitalskih dobičkov in okolju prijaznih proizvodov spodbuditi domače povpraševanje in gospodarstvo; meni, da bi zmanjševanje socialnih prispevkov delodajalcev za nižje dohodke in oprostitev malih podjetij plačevanja socialnih prispevkov podprla podjetja in potrošnike ter bi spodbudila povpraševanje;
Urges the ECOFIN Council to settle, by March 2009, the review of the Value Added Tax Directive in order to allow for reduced VAT levels on labour-intensive and staff-intensive services and other appropriate measures to stimulate domestic demand; calls for coordinated action and solidarity by the Member States in this respect by allowing for the differentiated options in sectoral VAT reduction provided for in the VAT Directive which Member States may or may not choose to implement, according to their respective priorities; considers that selective tax incentives should stimulate domestic demand as well as the economy through reduced taxation of capital gains and reduced taxation on ‘green’ products; considers that reducing employers’ social charges on lower incomes and exemption of small businesses from social contributions would support both businesses and consumers and would stimulate demand;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi zakonodajni predlog, s katerim bi t. i. mikroentitete izvzela iz področja uporabe četrte direktive o pravi družb v zvezi z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi;
Calls on the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal to exempt so-called micro-entities from the scope of the Fourth Company Law Directive on annual accounts;
meni, da je treba nujno okrepiti svetovno regulacijo finančnega sektorja, ki mora presegati klasični bančni sektor, in sprejeti drzne ukrepe za oblikovanje zavezujočih pravil glede bonitetnega nadzora, preglednosti in dobre prakse ter naložiti sankcije vsem narodom in ozemljem, ki ne sodelujejo; poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje ustrezne predloge, in Svet, naj pripravi politično podlago za hiter sprejem takšnega pristopa v mednarodnih pogajanjih; ugotavlja, da je svetovna finančna stabilnost javna dobrina, za njeno varovanje pa so odgovorni politični voditelji;
Believes that it is most urgent to enhance global regulation of the financial sector, which has to reach far beyond the classic banking sector, and to undertake bold measures to establish binding rules for prudential supervision, transparency and good practices, and apply sanctions to all nations and territories which do not cooperate; calls on the Commission to come forward with appropriate proposals and urges the Council to prepare the political field in international negotiations for a swift acceptance of such an approach; notes that global financial stability is a public good, and that responsibility for safeguarding this lies with political leaders;
toplo pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija pozvala k oblikovanju skupine na visoki ravni za odpravo birokratizacije, ter svetuje, da bi začeli čim prej izvajati predloge, o katerih se je dogovorila ta skupina; poudarja, da bi morala lizbonska strategija zmanjšati regulativno obremenitev podjetij, obenem pa povečati produktivnost ter s tem doseči višjo stopnjo rasti na vseh področjih; je prepričan, da mora Evropa preučiti alternative na področju predpisov, da se mora posvetovati z zainteresiranimi stranmi o novih predpisih ter se osredotočiti na razmerje med njihovimi stroški in koristmi;
Warmly welcomes the fact that the Commission has called for a High-Level Group on Debureaucratisation and asks that the proposals agreed by this Group be implemented as soon as possible; underlines that the Lisbon Strategy should provide for the reduction of regulatory burdens on companies, while furthering productivity and thus higher growth rates across the board; believes that Europe must examine alternatives for regulation, consult with stakeholders on new regulation and focus on the ratios between the costs and benefits of regulation;
Lizbonska strategija – ocena, naslednji koraki in pot naprej
Lisbon Strategy evaluation, next steps and the way ahead
pozdravlja napredek v okviru lizbonskega programa Skupnosti v zadnjih letih, opaža pa, da so številne pomembne (zakonodajne) pobude še vedno sredi postopka in jih je treba prednostno sprejeti; opozarja na slabo razmerje med kakovostjo in količino pobud v okviru različnih evropskih smernic; poziva k bolj uravnoteženemu pristopu za oblikovanje resničnega evropskega programa na vseh političnih področjih; podpira krepitev zunanje razsežnosti evropskega načrta reform, ki zagotavlja visoke standarde, ustrezen regulativni okvir in kooperativne delovne metode za sodelovanje z mednarodnimi gospodarskimi akterji in za soočanje s svetovnimi izzivi; zato odobrava delo, ki so se ga lotili v različnih generalnih direktoratih Komisije, da bi razvili nove in kvalitativne kazalce; poziva Svet, naj prosi Komisijo, da zagotovi uporabo teh kazalcev pri prihodnji oceni nacionalnih programov reform in njihovo vključitev v nadzor, ki ga sama izvaja, saj bo tako ustvarila bolj celovito in ustrezno sliko napredka lizbonske in göteborške strategije;
Welcomes the progress made under the Lisbon Community programme during the last years, but notes that a number of important legislative initiatives are still pending and should be adopted as a matter of priority; underlines the unbalanced situation regarding the quality and quantity of initiatives under the different European guidelines; calls for a more balanced approach in the interests of a real multi-supportive European policy mix reform programme; supports the strengthening of the external dimension of the European reform agenda, providing for high standards, appropriate regulatory framework and cooperative working methods in order to collaborate with other international economic players and to meet global challenges; welcomes, in this context, the work undertaken by various Commission directorates-general in developing new qualitative indicators; urges the Council to ask the Commission to ensure that such indicators be used in upcoming evaluations of the NRPs and incorporated in the Commission’s monitoring, thereby creating a more comprehensive and adequate picture of the successes of the Lisbon-Gothenburg Strategy;
poudarja, da boljši rezultati v okviru lizbonske strategije zahtevajo učinkovit pritisk Sveta v okviru večstranskega nadzora;
Emphasises that greater delivery within the Lisbon Strategy requires effective peer pressure on the part of the Council within the framework of multilateral surveillance;
poudarja, da so se ob novih izzivih, s katerimi se sooča Evropska unija, pokazale omejitve odprte metode usklajevanja, na kateri je lizbonska strategija temeljila devet let; zato poziva, naj bo obdobje po Lizboni osnovano na proaktivnejši in bolj globalni politiki, tj. na posodabljanju obstoječih skupnih politik (za trgovino, mednarodni trg, gospodarsko in monetarno unijo, ipd.) ter na novih skupnih zunanjih politikah (energija, podnebje, razvoj, migracije, ipd.);
Points out that the open method of coordination, on which the Lisbon Strategy has been based for nine years, has revealed these limitations in the face of new internal and external challenges confronting the European Union; urges therefore that the post-Lisbon period be based on a more proactive, more global policy, i.e. on the updating of existing common policies (for trade, internal market, economic and monetary union, etc.) and on new common external policies (energy, climate, development, migration, etc.);
poudarja, da je treba uresničiti „lizbonizacijo“ javnih izdatkov v vseh državah članicah in proračuna EU, saj bi s tem lizbonsko strategijo vključili v vse politike in močno okrepili učinkovitost pri doseganju ciljev rasti in ustvarjanja delovnih mest;
Stresses that the 'Lisbonisation' of public expenditure in all Member States and of the EU budget must become a reality, as it would mainstream the Lisbon Strategy itself and radically enhance effectiveness in the quest for achieving the goals of growth and job creation;
ugotavlja, da gre pri orodjih, ki jih Evropska unija potrebuje za spodbujanje ciljev lizbonske strategije, v bistvu za racionalizacijo vseh zadevnih politik, vseh finančnih instrumentov in skladov, pa tudi proračuna EU, na tak način, da bi pospešili in okrepili prizadevanja za rast in delovna mesta; meni, da so kratkoročno potrebne fiskalne spodbude za hitro okrevanje po gospodarski krizi, pod pogojem, da bodo preusmerile izdatke in spremenile ravnanje zasebnega sektorja v skladu s cilji lizbonske in göteborške strategije ter podnebno energetskega svežnja; v zvezi s tem svari pred nekritičnim zniževanjem davkov; meni, da morajo biti fiskalne spodbude namenjene uresničevanju socialnih in okoljskih ciljev; meni, da so mogoči načini zmanjšanje ravni davka na dodano vrednost za delovno intenzivne in lokalne storitve; meni tudi, da se sredstva lahko zagotovijo za okolju prijazne pobude v – med drugim – energetskem, pa tudi v avtomobilskem in gradbenem sektorju, še posebej zato, ker v teh dveh sektorjih zdaj močno upada povpraševanje po njunih proizvodih; meni, da bi bilo mogoče potrošnike podpreti – na primer – z davčnimi oprostitvami za nakup okolju prijaznejših avtomobilov in stanovanj;
Notes that the tools needed by the EU to foster the goals of the Lisbon Strategy are essentially the streamlining of all related policies, all financial instruments and funds, as well as the EU budget in such a way as to induce an acceleration and deepening of efforts for growth and job creation. considers that, in the short run, fiscal stimuli are needed for swift recovery from the economic crisis provided that it reorientates private expenses and behaviour in consistency with the objectives set by the Lisbon-Gothenburg Strategy and the climate-energy package; warns in this context against indiscriminate tax cuts; takes the view that fiscal stimuli must be targeted towards social and environmental objectives; considers that possible means are reductions in value-added tax levels, for labour-intensive services and locally supplied services, considers also that funding can be provided for green initiatives in, inter alia, the energy sector, as well as the automobile and the construction sector, especially since these sectors are experiencing a collapse in demand for their products; considers that consumers can, for example, be supported in buying greener cars and environmentally friendly housing through tax exemptions;
obžaluje še vedno slabo prepoznavnost lizbonske strategije v nacionalnih politikah številnih članic EU; meni, da je za zagotovitev njenega učinkovitega izvajanja treba mobilizirati vse zainteresirane strani v gospodarstvu; še posebej meni, da se bodo s tesnejšo udeležbo socialnih partnerjev, nacionalnih parlamentov, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter civilne družbe izboljšali rezultati lizbonske strategije in se bo okrepila javna razprava o ustreznih reformah; je prepričan, da je mogoče zagotoviti pritegnitev vseh zainteresiranih strani s primernim izvajanjem načela upravljanja na več ravneh;
Regrets the still weak visibility of the Lisbon Strategy in the national politics of many EU countries; takes the view that the mobilisation of all economic stakeholders is essential to ensure its effective implementation; believes, in particular, that closer involvement of social partners, national parliaments, regional and local authorities as well as civil society will improve the results of the Lisbon Strategy and enhance the public debate on appropriate reforms; believes that the mobilisation of all stakeholders can be ensured through proper implementation of the principle of multi-level governance;
ponovno obžaluje, da se Parlament, Svet in Komisija ob posvetovanju z Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom ter Odborom regij še vedno niso dogovorili za jasen načrt in kodeks ravnanja, ki bi zagotovil ustrezno sodelovanje in polno vključenost vseh ustreznih institucij EU pri nadaljnji obravnavi nadgradnje lizbonske strategije; s tem v zvezi poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju bližnje revizije lizbonske strategije predstavita nadaljnje predloge za tesno sodelovanje ustreznih institucij EU na tem področju ter razmislek in načrt o prihodnji strategiji Lizbona II;
Regrets once again that a clear plan and code of practice has still not been agreed between Parliament, the Council and the Commission in consultation with the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, which would guarantee appropriate cooperation and the full involvement of all relevant EU institutions concerned in the appropriate further handling of the follow-up of the Lisbon Strategy; calls, in this connection, on the Council and the Commission to submit forthwith proposals for the close cooperation of the relevant EU institutions with a view to the impending revision of the integrated policy guidelines as well as the reflection and set-up of the forthcoming Lisbon II agenda;