natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da so "evropeizacija" finančnih nadzornih struktur, učinkovita pravila o konkurenci, ustrezna regulacija in izboljšanje preglednosti finančnih trgov srednjeročno ključnega pomena pri izogibanju ponovitvi sedanje krize; meni, da bi povezan, celovit (ki pokriva vse finančne sektorje) in skladen nadzorni okvir, začenši z usklajenim pristopom do uravnavanja čezmejne porazdelitve finančnih tveganj, na podlagi usklajene zakonodaje zmanjšal stroške izpolnjevanja zahtev pri dejavnostih, ki sodijo pod različne pristojnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predloge za revizijo sedanje nadzorne strukture v skladu s temi načeli; poziva države članice, naj se ne glede na v tem odstavku omenjene ukrepe srednjeročno vrnejo k uravnoteženemu javnemu financiranju, in jih poziva, naj pojasnijo, na kakšen način bodo to dosegle;
Considers a 'Europeanisation' of the financial supervision structure, effective competition rules, appropriate regulation and improved transparency of the financial markets to be essential in the medium term to avoid a repetition of the current crisis; takes the view that an integrated, comprehensive (covering all financial sectors) and coherent supervisory framework, starting with a balanced approach in regulating the cross-border spread of financial risk on the basis of harmonised legislation, would decrease compliance costs in the case of multi-jurisdiction activities; calls on the Commission to put forward proposals for revising the existing supervisory architecture along those principles; calls on the Member States, notwithstanding the measures set out in this paragraph, to return in the medium term to balanced public financing, and therefore calls on the Member States to clarify how they will be able to achieve that objective;
podpira odločitev evropskih članic skupine G20 na srečanju v Berlinu konec februarja 2009, da sprejmejo "odločne ukrepe proti davčnim oazam in jurisdikcijam, ki niso pripravljene sodelovati", in sicer tako, da se čim prej doseže dogovor o naboru sankcij, ki ga je treba podpreti na vrhunskem srečanju v Londonu; priporoča, da Evropska unija na svoji ravni sprejme ustrezen zakonodajni okvir z ustreznimi spodbudami za udeležence na trgu, da ne poslujejo s temi jurisdikcijami; poudarja, da so za obravnavanje tega vprašanja bistvenega pomena usklajeni pristopi v svetovnem merilu;
Supports the decision of the European members of the G20 at the end of February 2009 in Berlin to take 'definitive actions against tax havens and uncooperative jurisdictions', by agreeing on a toolbox of sanctions as soon as possible, which has to be endorsed at the London summit; recommends that the EU adopt at its own level the adequate legislative framework with appropriate incentives towards market players to refrain from doing business with these jurisdictions; underlines how convergent approaches globally are essential to tackle this issue;
poziva države članice in Evropsko unijo, naj prilagodijo proračun EU in omogočijo uporabo neuporabljenih finančnih sredstev, da se podprejo cilji politik EU;
41 Calls on the Member States and the European Union to amend the EU budget with a view to allowing for the use of unused financial resources in order to support the policy goals of the European Union;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vse več regionalnih razlik v zvezi s posledicami finančne krize, ki se med drugim odraža v vse večji razliki med vrednostmi kreditov držav članic, kar vodi do večjih stroškov posojil za tiste z nižjimi bonitetami; poziva k razvoju novih inovativnih finančnih instrumentov, da bi ublažili te učinke in privabili svež kapital;
Is concerned by the increasing regional differences with regard to the effects of the financial crisis, reflected, inter alia, in the increasing spread between the creditworthiness of Member States, leading to higher costs for loans for those with lower ratings; calls for the development of new innovative financial instruments in order to mitigate these effects and to attract fresh capital;
poudarja, da kriza pušča skrajno negativne gospodarske in socialne posledice v številnih novih državah članicah in tako znatno upočasnjuje njihovo približevanje EU-15; poleg tega pričakuje, da se bo učinek krize razširil in pustil posledice na euru in gospodarstvih euroobmočja; zato poziva k odločnim ukrepom evropske solidarnosti, da se zaščiti euroobmočje in okrepi notranja skladnost Evropske unije, zlasti z namenom močnejše podpore gospodarstvom srednje in vzhodne Evrope, še posebej s prilagajanjem strukturnih skladov in Evropskega sklada za prilagajanje globalizaciji za te države ter s posebno podporo Evropske investicijske banke kar zadeva nove inovativne finančne instrumente; opozarja na pomen evropske enotnosti v času gospodarske krize, ko nazadovanje gospodarstva ogroža tudi skupne evropske vrednote; zato poziva k pozornejšim in previdnejšim ukrepom Komisije glede novih držav članic;
Underlines that the crisis is having extremely negative economic and social consequences in many of the new Member States, substantially slowing their convergence with the EU-15; expects, furthermore, spill-over effects, affecting the euro and the economies of the euro-zone; calls, therefore, for strong European solidarity measures to protect the eurozone and strengthen the internal consistency of the European Union, in particular with a view to stronger support for the economies of Central and Eastern Europe, especially by adapting the structural funds and the Globalisation Fund for these countries, as well as special support from the EIB with regard to new innovative financial instruments; points to the importance of European unity in times of economic crisis when the economic downturn also threatens European common values; calls, therefore, for more attentive and careful action on the part of the Commission with regard to the new Member States;
ugotavlja, da je treba finančne instrumente EU uporabiti za podporo javni porabi; poudarja, da je treba za prispevek k oživitvi gospodarstva v Evropi pospešiti stopnjo in hitrost izvajanja teh finančnih instrumentov; meni, da je kohezijska politika Evropske unije odličen instrument za ozemeljsko solidarnost, zlasti za njene čezmejne elemente; je zelo zadovoljen z nedavno "lizbonizacijo" kohezijske politike; meni, da bi bilo treba z ukrepi za usmerjanje regionalnih skladov bolj v smeri podjetništva, raziskav, inovacij, zaposlovanja in novih sposobnostih, zagotoviti razpoložljivost znatnih sredstev na lokalni ravni za okrepitev poslovnega potenciala in podporo najranljivejšim;
Notes that EU funding instruments should be used to support public spending; points out that, in order to contribute to the economic recovery of the European Union, the implementation rate and speed of these funding instruments needs to be accelerated; considers that the European Union's cohesion policy is an excellent instrument of territorial solidarity, especially the trans-border components thereof; is very satisfied with the recent "Lisbonisation" of the cohesion policy; considers that, through steps to direct regional funds more towards entrepreneurship, research, innovation, employment and new skills, considerable funds should become available at local level to enhance business potential and support the most vulnerable;
poudarja, da bi morali tudi programi vseevropskih prometnih omrežij in vseevropskih energetskih omrežij kar največ prispevati k načrtu za oživitev gospodarstva in k doseganju ciljev lizbonske strategije; meni, da so rezultati pozitivnih prizadevanj koordinatorjev in oblikovanja izvajalske agencije vseevropskega prometnega omrežja ter izvedbene zakonodaje za izboljšanje učinkovitosti somodalnosti številni v celoti izvedeni projekti vseevropskega prometnega omrežja po celotni Evropski uniji za spodbujanje trajnostne rasti in boljše mobilnosti;
Points out that the programmes relating to the Trans-European Transport Network (TENs-T) and the Trans-European Energy Networks (TENs-E) should also make their full contribution both to the European Economic Recovery Plan and to the Lisbon Strategy goals; considers that the positive efforts of the coordinators as well as the setting-up of the Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency, together with the implementing legislation to improve the efficiency of co-modality, have resulted in a substantial number of fully completed TEN-T projects all over the European Union to boost sustainable growth and better mobility;
ugotavlja, da ima Evropska investicijska banka pomembno vlogo pri načrtu EU za oživitev gospodarstva; pozdravlja povečanje obsega kapitala, ki ga Evropski investicijski banki namenjajo države članice, da bi ta dala več posojil MSP; vztraja, da morajo biti posojila tem podjetjem na voljo v vseh državah članicah na pregleden in pravičen način; poziva k dodatni okrepitvi vloge Evropske investicijske banke v zvezi z novimi inovativnimi finančnimi instrumenti;
Notes the essential role of the EIB with regard to the European Economic Recovery Plan; welcomes the increase in capital for the EIB from the Member States in order to issue more loans to SMEs; insists that loans are accessible to SMEs from all Member States, in a transparent and equitable manner; calls for a further strengthening of the role of the EIB with regard to new innovative financial instruments;
v zvezi z gospodarskim upravljanjem meni, da sedanja gospodarska kriza zahteva odločno, usklajeno in pravočasno posredovanje vseh držav članic ter regulativne ukrepe, da bi utrdili finančne trge in povrnili zaupanje; meni, da bi morali novi zakonodajni ukrepi temeljiti na načelih preglednosti in odgovornosti ter da je treba izvajati učinkovito nadzorovanje, da se varujejo pravice potrošnikov; meni, da bi morali novi predpisi vključevati zahteve proti pretirani uporabi finančnih vzvodov in za višje kapitalske rezerve bank; poleg tega opozarja na sedanje težave glede pravil vrednotenja in ocene tveganja; meni, da mora biti nadzor v koraku s finančnimi inovacijami, Evropa pa mora v zvezi s tem izboljšati strokovno znanje in izkušnje svojih regulativnih organov; meni, da več predpisov ne pomeni nujno, da so ti predpisi tudi boljši; meni, da morajo države članice usklajevati svoje regulativne ukrepe; meni, da je treba zaščititi stabilizacijske standarde in ureditev finančnega nadzora v euroobmočju;
Considers, with regard to economic governance, that the current economic crisis requires firm, coordinated and timely government intervention by all Member States, as well as regulatory measures in order to shore up financial markets and restore confidence; considers that new legislative measures should be based on the principles of transparency and accountability and that effective monitoring needs to be implemented so as to safeguard consumer rights; considers that new regulation should include requirements against excessive leveraging and for higher capital reserves for banks; points, moreover, in this connection, to the present problems relating to valuation rules and risk assessment; considers that controls need to keep up with financial innovations and that the European Union should enhance the know-how of its regulatory bodies in this respect; considers that more regulation is not necessarily better regulation; considers that Member States must coordinate their regulatory actions; considers that stabilisation standards and regulation of the financial supervision in the euro area must be safeguarded;
opozarja, da tudi bonitetne agencije nosijo svoj del odgovornosti za finančno krizo; pozdravlja poziv Evropskega sveta, da se pospeši predlog Komisije z dne 12. novembra 2008 za Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o bonitetnih agencijah ( KOM(2008)0704 ) za zaostritev pravil o bonitetnih agencijah;
Recalls that credit rating agencies bear their share of responsibility for the financial crisis; welcomes the call by the European Council to speed up the adoption of the Commission proposal of 12 November 2008 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Credit Rating Agencies ( COM(2008)0704 ) to tighten up the rules on rating agencies;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi zakonodajni predlog, s katerim bi t. i. mikroentitete izvzela iz področja uporabe Četrte direktive Sveta 78/660/EGS z dne 25. julija 1978 o letnih računovodskih izkazih posameznih vrst družb, ki temelji na členu 54(3)(g) Pogodbe UL L 222, 14.8.1978, str.
Calls on the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal to exempt so-called micro-entities from the scope of the Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 based on Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty on the annual accounts of certain types of companies OJ L 222, 14.8.1978, p.
meni, da je treba nujno okrepiti svetovno regulacijo finančnega sektorja, ki mora presegati klasični bančni sektor, in sprejeti drzne ukrepe za oblikovanje zavezujočih pravil glede bonitetnega nadzora, preglednosti in dobre prakse ter naložiti sankcije vsem državam in ozemljem, ki ne sodelujejo; poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje ustrezne predloge, in Svet, naj pripravi politično podlago za hiter sprejem takšnega pristopa v mednarodnih pogajanjih; ugotavlja, da je svetovna finančna stabilnost javna dobrina, za njeno varovanje pa so odgovorni politični voditelji;
Believes that it is very urgent to enhance global regulation of the financial sector, which has to reach far beyond the classic banking sector, to undertake bold measures to establish binding rules for prudential supervision, transparency and good practices, and to apply sanctions to all states and territories which do not cooperate; calls on the Commission to put forward appropriate proposals in this regard and urges the Council to prepare the political field in international negotiations for a swift acceptance of such an approach; notes that global financial stability is a public good, and that responsibility for safeguarding this lies with political leaders;
poziva Svet, naj do marca 2009 zaključi pregled Direktive Sveta 2006/112/ES z dne 28. novembra 2006 o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost UL L 347, 11.12.2006, str.
Urges the Council to settle, by March 2009, the review of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p.
Direktive o davku na dodano vrednost, da se omogočijo zmanjšanje ravni tega davka za delovno intenzivne storitve in za storitve, za katere je potrebno veliko osebja, in drugi ustrezni ukrepi za spodbujanje domačega povpraševanja; poziva k usklajenim ukrepom in solidarnosti držav članic v zvezi s tem, in sicer tako, da se dopuščajo različne možnosti v sektorskem znižanju davka na dodano vrednost, ki so predvidene v Direktivi o davku na dodano vrednost, ki jo države članice lahko izvajajo ali ne, v skladu s svojimi prednostnimi nalogami; selektivne davčne spodbude bi morale spodbuditi domače povpraševanje in gospodarstvo;
in order to allow for reduced VAT levels on labour-intensive and staff-intensive services and other appropriate measures to stimulate domestic demand; calls for coordinated action and solidarity by the Member States in this respect by allowing for the differentiated options in sectoral VAT reduction provided for in the VAT Directive which Member States may or may not choose to implement, according to their respective priorities; considers that selective tax incentives should stimulate domestic demand as well as the economy;
toplo pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija pozvala k oblikovanju skupine na visoki ravni za odpravo birokratizacije, ter svetuje, da bi začeli čim prej izvajati predloge, o katerih se je dogovorila ta skupina; poudarja, da bi morala lizbonska strategija zmanjšati regulativno obremenitev podjetij, obenem pa povečati produktivnost ter s tem doseči višjo stopnjo rasti na vseh področjih; je prepričan, da mora Evropa preučiti alternative na področju predpisov, da se mora posvetovati z zainteresiranimi stranmi o novih predpisih ter se osredotočiti na razmerje med njihovimi stroški in koristmi;
Warmly welcomes the fact that the Commission has called for a High-Level Group on Debureaucratisation and asks that the proposals agreed by that Group be implemented as soon as possible; stresses that the Lisbon Strategy should provide for the reduction of regulatory burdens on companies, while furthering productivity and thus higher growth rates across the board; believes that the European Union must examine alternatives for regulation, consult with stakeholders on new regulation and focus on the ratios between the costs and benefits of regulation;
pozdravlja napredek v okviru lizbonskege strategije v zadnjih letih, opaža pa, da so številne pomembne (zakonodajne) pobude še vedno sredi postopka in jih je treba prednostno sprejeti; opozarja na slabo razmerje med kakovostjo in količino pobud v okviru različnih evropskih smernic; poziva k bolj uravnoteženemu pristopu za oblikovanje resničnega evropskega programa na vseh političnih področjih; podpira krepitev zunanje razsežnosti evropskega načrta reform, ki zagotavlja visoke standarde, ustrezen regulativni okvir in kooperativne delovne metode za sodelovanje z mednarodnimi gospodarskimi akterji in za soočanje s svetovnimi izzivi; zato odobrava delo, ki so se ga lotili v različnih generalnih direktoratih Komisije, da bi razvili nove in kvalitativne kazalce; poziva Svet, naj prosi Komisijo, da zagotovi uporabo teh kazalcev pri prihodnji oceni nacionalnih programov reform in njihovo vključitev v nadzor, ki ga sama izvaja, saj bo tako ustvarila bolj celovito in ustrezno sliko napredka lizbonske in göteborške strategije;
Welcomes the progress made under the Lisbon Strategy during recent years but notes that a number of important legislative initiatives are still pending and should be adopted as a matter of priority; underlines the unbalanced situation regarding the quality and quantity of initiatives under the different European guidelines; calls for a more balanced approach in the interests of a real multi-supportive EU policy mix reform programme; supports the strengthening of the external dimension of the European reform agenda, providing for high standards, appropriate regulatory framework and cooperative working methods in order to collaborate with other international economic players and to meet global challenges; welcomes, in this context, the work undertaken by various Commission directorates-general in developing new qualitative indicators; urges the Council to ask the Commission to ensure that such indicators be used in the upcoming evaluations of the NRPs and be incorporated in the Commission's monitoring, thereby creating a more comprehensive and adequate picture of the successes of the Lisbon-Gothenburg Strategy;
poudarja, da so se ob novih izzivih, s katerimi se sooča Evropska unija, pokazale omejitve odprte metode usklajevanja, na kateri je lizbonska strategija temeljila devet let; zato poziva, naj bo obdobje po lizbonski strategiji osnovano na proaktivnejši in bolj globalni politiki, tj. na posodabljanju obstoječih skupnih politik (za trgovino, mednarodni trg, gospodarsko in monetarno unijo, ipd.) ter na novih skupnih zunanjih politikah (energija, podnebje, razvoj, migracije, ipd.);
Points out that the open method of coordination, on which the Lisbon Strategy has been based for nine years, has revealed these limitations in the face of new internal and external challenges confronting the European Union; urges, therefore, that the post-Lisbon Strategy period be based on a more proactive, more global policy, i.e. on the updating of existing common policies (for trade, internal market, economic and monetary union, etc.) and on new common external policies (energy, climate, development, migration, etc.);
obžaluje, da leto pred iztekom časovnega načrta lizbonske strategije jasno opredeljeni cilji še niso izpolnjeni, napredek na programskih področjih pa doslej ni bil zadosten; meni, da v prizadevanjih držav članic ni bilo dovolj izvedbenih ukrepov, da bi se bolj približali ciljem lizbonske strategije; je prepričan, da je treba lizbonsko strategijo obravnavati kot pomembno smernico za politike za oblikovanje prihodnosti, katerih cilj je močna, konkurenčna in rast spodbujajoča EU; zato meni, da jo morajo države članice jemati resneje in je ne obravnavati zgolj kot niz oddaljenih ciljev, ampak kot akcijski načrt za nadaljnji razvoj Evrope;
Regrets that, with only one year left on the timescale of the Lisbon strategy, clearly defined goals have not been met and progress in programme areas has been insufficient; takes the view that Member States" efforts have been lacking in implementing measures to bring the goals of the Lisbon strategy closer; believes that the Lisbon Strategy must be seen as an important guideline for future-shaping policies, aimed at a strong, competitive and growth-fostering EU; considers, therefore, that it deserves to be taken more seriously by Member States and should not be seen merely as a set of distant goals, but as an action plan for the further development of Europe;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči uporabnost strategije po Lizboni z novimi cilji ter naj predvsem oceni pripravljenost držav članic za izvajanje takšnega novega programa in njegovo upravičenost; poudarja, da je treba integrirane smernice za rast in delovna mesta spremeniti glede na okoliščine gospodarske recesije in poziva Svet, naj sprejme kratkoročne ukrepe za ohranitev stopnje zaposlenosti iz leta 2008, za naložbe za boj proti podnebnim spremembam in za zagotavljanje zadostnih prihodkov, zlasti kar zadeva najbolj ranljive družbene skupine; pričakuje, da bo Komisija za spomladansko srečanje Evropskega sveta v Lizboni leta 2010 pravočasno oblikovala pobude in predstavila predloge v zvezi s temi cilji;
Asks the Commission to analyse the usefulness of a post-Lisbon strategy with new aims and goals, and especially to assess the readiness of Member States to implement such a new programme, and its viability; stresses the need to refocus the IPGs against the background of the economic downturn and urges the Council to agree on short-term measures to safeguard the 2008 employment rate, to invest in the fight against climate change and to ensure sufficient incomes, especially with regard to the most vulnerable groups of society; expects the Commission to launch initiatives and present proposals with respect to these goals in good time for the Spring Lisbon Council in 2010;
poudarja, da je treba uresničiti "lizbonizacijo" javnih izdatkov v vseh državah članicah in proračuna EU, saj bi s tem lizbonsko strategijo vključili v vse politike in močno okrepili učinkovitost pri doseganju ciljev rasti in ustvarjanja delovnih mest;
Stresses that the 'Lisbonisation' of public expenditure in all Member States and of the EU budget must become a reality, as it would mainstream the Lisbon Strategy itself and radically enhance effectiveness in the quest for achieving the goals of growth and job creation;