natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker člen 19 Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah določa, da ima vsak pravico do svobode mnenja in izražanja; ker ta pravica vključuje pravico do svojega mnenja brez vmešavanja, ter iskanja, sprejemanja in širjenja informacije in idej s kakršnimi koli sredstvi in ne glede na meje,
whereas Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers;
pozdravlja izjavo svetovnega vrha v Tuniziji od 16. do 18. novembra 2005 o izjemnem pomenu informacijske družbe za demokracijo ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin; predvsem svobode izražanja in mnenja kot tudi svobode do prejemanja in dostopa do informacij,
welcoming the statement of the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November 2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; in particular the freedom of expression and opinion, as well as the freedom to receive and access information;
ker se je danes boj za svobodo izražanja v veliki meri preselil v splet, saj je internet postal sredstvo za izražanje mnenj političnih oporečnikov, borcev za demokracijo, zagovornikov človekovih pravic in neodvisnih novinarjev po vsem svetu,
whereas the fight for freedom of expression has today largely shifted on-line as the Internet has become a mean of expression of choice for political dissidents, democracy activists, human rights defenders and independent journalists worldwide;
ker lahko dostop do interneta krepi demokracijo in pripomore h gospodarskemu in socialnemu razvoju države in ker omejevanje takega dostopa ni združljivo s svobodo izražanja,
whereas access to the Internet can strengthen democracy and contribute to a country's economic and social development and restricting such access is incompatible with the right to freedom of expression;
ker je treba omejevanje dostopa dovoliti v primerih uporabe interneta za nezakonite dejavnosti, kot so spodbujanje k sovraštvu, nasilju in rasizmu, totalitarna propaganda, dostop otrok do pornografije in spolno izkoriščanje otrok,
whereas restrictions should only exist in cases of using the Internet for illegal activities, such as incitement to hatred, violence and racism, totalitarian propaganda and children's access to pornography or their sexual exploitation;
ker po navedbah Novinarjev brez meja avtoritarni režimi in vlade razvijajo vse bolj daljnosežne metode nadzora interneta, predvsem čedalje bolj zapleteno tehnologijo filtriranja in nadzora elektronskih komunikacij, ter vzpostavljajo spletno policijo,
whereas, according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and setting-up cyber-police;
ker po navedbah organizacij za varstvo človekovih pravic trenutno v zaporih pridržanih veliko število spletnih oporečnikov – največ od tega na Kitajskem – vključno s Haom Wujem, kitajskim avtorjem spletnih dnevnikov in snemalcem dokumentarcev, Yang Zilijem, kitajskim spletnim oporečnikom, Motdžabo Saminedžadom, iranskim avtorjem spletnih dnevnikov, Mohammedom Abujem, tunizijskim odvetnikom, Pham Hong Sonom, vietnamskim zdravnikom, in Habibom Salehom, sirijskim spletnim novinarjem; ker najnovejši primeri zadevajo egiptovska avtorja spletnih dnevnikov Mohameda Šarkavija in Karima El Šerja,
whereas, according to human rights organisations, a large number of cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China - including Hao Wu, Chinese blogger and documentary filmmaker, Yang Zili, Chinese cyber-dissident, Shi Tao, Chinese journalist at the daily Dangdai Shangbao, Motjaba Saminejad, Iranian blogger, Mohammed Abbou, Tunisian lawyer, Pham Hong Son, Vietnamese doctor and Habib Saleh, Syrian online journalist; whereas the most recent cases concern the Egyptian bloggers Mohamed Sharkawy and Karim Lel-shaer;
ker se po zadnjem poročilu Novinarjev brez meja lahko veliko držav obravnava kot sovražnice svobode izražanja na spletu, in sicer Kitajsko, Belorusijo, Burmo, Kubo, Iran, Libijo, Maldive, Nepal, Severno Korejo, Uzbekistan, Savdsko Arabijo, Sirijo, Tunizijo, Turkmenistan in Vietnam,
whereas a number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam.
ker podjetja s sedežem v demokratičnih državah tem državam posredujejo sredstva za cenzuro spleta in nadzor elektronskih komunikacij,
whereas companies based in democratic States partly provide these countries the means to censor the web and to monitor electronic communication;
ker je kitajska vlada uspešno pregovorila podjetja, kot so Yahoo, Google in Microsoft, da olajšajo cenzuro svojih storitev na kitajskem notranjem trgu; ugotavlja tudi, da so druge vlade tudi od drugih podjetij zahtevale sredstva za cenzuro,
whereas Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market; also notes that other governments have required the means for censorship from other companies;
ker so vlade opremo in tehnologijo, ki jo prodajajo podjetja iz zahoda, kot so CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, podružnica France Telecom, uporabljale za cenzuro spleta, kar ovira svobodo izražanja,
whereas equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet preventing freedom of expression;
ker so ameriški zakonodajalci februarja 2006 sprejeli Zakon o svetovni spletni svobodi, namenjen urejanju dejavnosti internetnih podjetij, ko poslujejo v represivnih državah,
whereas US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet businesses when they operate in repressive countries;
ker mora EU dokazati, da so pravice internetnih uporabnikov v središču njenega zanimanja in da bo spodbujala svobodno izražanja na spletu,
whereas the EU should demonstrate that the rights of Internet users are at the heart of its concerns and that it is ready to act to promote free speech on-line;
v zvezi s tem poziva Svet in države članice EU, da se sporazumejo o skupni izjavi, ki bo potrdila njihovo zavezo k varovanju pravic uporabnikov interneta in spodbujanju svobodnega izražanja v internetu po vsem svetu;
Calls, in this respect, on the Council and the EU Member States to agree on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on the internet world-wide;
gradnji informacijske družbe na podlagi človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
building the information society on the basis of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
boju proti digitalni vrzeli in iskanju sredstev za akcijske načrte, ki bodo pospeševali razvoj,
combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to foster development,
razvoju načrtov za upravljanje interneta, ki bodo bolj uravnoteženi, pluralistični in bodo predstavljali vključene države, da se sooči z novimi tehnološkimi izzivi (nezaželena pošta, varovanje podatkov itd.);
developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced, pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.);
močno obsoja omejitve internetne vsebine, naj se nanašajo na širjenje ali prejemanje informacij, ki jih vsiljujejo vlade in niso v soglasju z zagotavljanjem svobode izražanja; močno obsoja nadlegovanje in zapiranje novinarjev in drugih, ki izražajo svoje mnenje v internetu; s tem v zvezi poziva Svet in Komisijo, da podvzameta vse potrebne ukrepe v odnosu do oblasti zadevnih držav, da bodo takoj izpuščeni vsi pridržani internetni uporabniki;
Strongly condemns restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply to the dissemination or to the receipt of information, that are imposed by Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom of expression; strongly condemns the harassment and imprisonment of journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet; calls, in this respect, on the Council and the Commission to take all necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for the immediate release of all detained Internet users;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da pripravita prostovoljni kodeks ravnanja, ki bi omejeval dejavnosti gospodarskih družb v represivnih državah;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to draw up a voluntary code of conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive countries;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da vzdržujeta prisotnost in aktivno sodelovanje EU ter predstavitev skupnih stališč predvsem v ECOSOC, Mednarodni zvezi za telekomunikacije (ITU), UNESCO in UNDP;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to maintain the presence and active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP;
B6-0384 , 0390 , 0392 , 0394 , 0396 in 0397/2006
B6-0384 , 0390 , 0392 , 0394 , 0396 and 0397/2006
in Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str.
and to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p.
, ki med drugim določa sistem Evropske skupnosti o nepreferencialnih pravilih o poreklu blaga,
setting up, inter alia, the European Community's non-preferential rules of origin system,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 918/83 z dne 28. marca 1983 o sistemu oprostitev carin v Skupnosti UL L 105, 23.4.1983, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty OJ L 105, 23.4.1983, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prihodnosti tekstilnega in oblačilnega sektorja v razširjeni Evropski uniji ( KOM(2003)0649 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on the future of the textiles and clothing sector in the enlarged European Union ( COM(2003)0649 ),
ker EU trenutno nima usklajenih določb oziroma skupnih praks v zvezi z označbo izvora v EU; ker razlike med veljavnimi uredbami v državah članicah in odsotnost jasnih predpisov Skupnosti na tem področju povzročata razdrobljen pravni okvir,
whereas, at present, the EU does not have any harmonised provisions or uniform practices on origin marking in the EU; whereas disparities between regulations in force in the Member States as well as the absence of clear Community rules in this area result in a fragmentary legal framework,
ker niso dovoljeni nacionalni ukrepi, ki bi predpisovali obvezno označbo izvora blaga, ki je uvoženo iz drugih držav članic, medtem ko za obvezno označbo izvora blaga, uvoženega iz tretjih držav, takih omejitev ni,
whereas national measures imposing compulsory origin marking on goods imported from other Member States are prohibited, while there is no such limitation on compulsory origin marking on goods imported from third countries,
ker si je EU v Lizbonski agendi zastavila za cilj okrepiti gospodarstvo EU, med drugim tudi s povečanjem konkurenčnosti industrije EU v svetovnem gospodarstvu; ker so nekatere kategorije izdelkov široke porabe morda konkurenčne zato, ker jih to, da so izdelani v EU, povezuje s slovesom kakovosti in visokih proizvodnih standardov,
whereas, in the Lisbon Agenda, the EU set itself the objective of strengthening the EU economy by, inter alia, improving the competitiveness of EU industry in the world economy; whereas, for certain categories of consumer goods, competitiveness may lie in the fact that their production in the EU is associated with a reputation for quality and high production standards,
ker bi sistem navedbe države izvora omogočil potrošnikom v EU, da bi bili v celoti seznanjeni z državo izvora izdelka, ki ga kupujejo; ker bi potrošniki tako lahko istovetili te izdelke z družbenimi, okoljskimi in varnostnimi standardi, ki se običajno povezujejo s to državo,
whereas an origin-marking scheme would have the aim of allowing EU consumers to be fully aware of the country of origin of the products they purchase; whereas consumers would thus be able to identify those products with the social, environmental and safety standards generally associated with that country,
ker je predlog, ki uvaja sistem obvezne navedbe države izvora v EU, skrčen na omejeno število uvoženih izdelkov, kot so tekstil, nakit, oblačila, obuvala, usnje, svetila in svetlobna oprema, steklena posoda, keramika in torbice, pri katerih zahteva po oznaki "izdelano v" dokončnim potrošnikom omogoča ključne in dragocene informacije pri dokončni izbiri,
whereas the proposal introducing a mandatory country of origin marking system in the EU is restricted to a limited number of imported products such as textiles, jewellery, apparel, footwear, leather, lamps and light fittings, glassware, ceramics and handbags, for which the 'made in' requirement provides valuable information for final consumer choice,
ker so številni veliki trgovinski partnerji EU, na primer ZDA, Kitajska, Japonska in Kanada, uvedli predpise o obvezni navedbi države izvora,
whereas a number of the EU's major trading partners, such as the United States, China, Japan and Canada, have enacted mandatory origin-marking requirements,
ker je ključno, da se s temi trgovinskimi partnerji vzpostavijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji,
whereas it is crucial to ensure that a level playing-field is restored with such trade partners,
ker bi večja ozaveščenost potrošnikov, zaradi katere so izdelki iz EU bolj privlačni, lahko zlasti koristila malim in srednje velikim podjetjem in sektorjem, izpostavljenim svetovni konkurenci,
whereas increased awareness on the part of consumers, making EU products more attractive, would particularly benefit SMEs and sectors exposed to global competition,
ker Okvirni sporazum z dne 26. maja 2005 o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo zavezuje Komisijo, da Parlament v celoti in nemudoma obvešča o svojih zakonodajnih predlogih,
whereas the Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005 on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission obliges the Commission to keep Parliament fully and promptly informed about its legislative proposals,
vzame na znanje predlog uredbe Sveta, ki uvaja obvezno navedbo države izvora za nekatere izdelke, uvožene iz tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo ("označba izvora");
Notes the proposal for a Council Regulation introducing compulsory indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries into the European Union ('origin marking');
obžaluje dejstvo, da Komisija sploh ni uradno poslala predlagane uredbe Parlamentu v vednost, čeprav se Komisija in Svet dobro zavedata, kako pomembna je označba izvora za Parlament; razume, da ta predlog pravno gledano ne zahteva obveznega posvetovanja s Parlamentom; vendar pa vztraja, da bi bilo treba Parlamentu vedno dati možnost, da pravočasno pove svoje mnenje o vseh pomembnih pobudah drugih institucij Skupnosti;
Deplores the fact that, despite the Commission and the Council's being fully aware of the importance that Parliament attaches to origin marking, the Commission did not formally send the proposed regulation to Parliament for information; understands that this proposal does not legally require Parliament to be consulted; insists, however, that Parliament should always be given the opportunity to express its views on any relevant initiative taken by other Community institutions in a timely manner;
vztraja, da se je Komisija zavezala, da zagotovi sodelovanje Parlamenta v skladu z zgoraj navedenim okvirnim sporazumom na način, da se lahko v največji možni meri upošteva mnenje Parlamenta;
Insists on the Commission's obligation to ensure the involvement of Parliament, in accordance with the above-mentioned Framework Agreement, in such a way as to take Parliament's views into account as far as possible;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da nemudoma obvestita Parlament o izidih morebitnih nadaljnjih presoj vplivov in pravnih analiz, opravljenih zlasti zaradi domnevnih neskladnosti predlagane uredbe z obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti in pravili STO;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to inform Parliament without delay about the results of any further impact assessment and legal analysis carried out, in particular with respect to the alleged inconsistencies of the proposed regulation with existing Community legislation and WTO rules;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj posebej poudarita spodbujanje dobre podobe industrije v EU v Skupnosti in izven nje, ohranjanje njene identitete in posebnosti ter zagotavljanje, da vsesplošnega dobrega slovesa industrije Skupnosti ter podobe in privlačnosti visokokakovostnih proizvodov iz EU ne omadežuje nenatančna in zavajajoča označba izvora;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to place special emphasis on promoting the image of EU industry inside and outside the Community, safeguarding its identity and specificity, and ensuring that the overall good reputation of the Community's industry and the image and attractiveness of high value EU products is not tarnished by inaccurate or misleading indications of origin;
poudarja, da zaščita potrošnikov zahteva pregledna in skladna pravila trgovanja, vključno z označbo izvora;
Stresses that consumer protection requires transparent and consistent trade rules including, inter alia, indications of origin;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj sprejmeta vse potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji s trgovinskimi partnerji, ki izvajajo zahtevo po označbi izvora;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to take all necessary steps to ensure a level playing-field with trading partners which have implemented origin-marking requirements;
poziva države članice, naj ohranijo dosleden pristop Skupnosti do tega vprašanja, kar bi omogočilo potrošnikom v EU, da dobijo popolnejše in natančnejše informacije;
Urges Member States to maintain a consistent Community approach to this issue to enable EU consumers to receive more complete and accurate information;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami odločno posreduje za zaščito legitimnih pravic in pričakovanj potrošnikov, kadar koli naleti na dokaze o ponarejanju in/ali uporabi goljufivih ali zavajajočih označb izvora s strani proizvajalcev in uvoznikov izven EU;
Encourages the Commission to strongly intervene, together with the Member States, to defend consumers' legitimate rights and expectations whenever there is evidence of counterfeiting and/or use of fraudulent or misleading origin markings by non-EU producers and importers;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v korist manjših egejskih otokov in o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1782/2003 ( KOM(2006)0264 – C6-0232/2006 – 2006/0093(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down specific measures for agriculture in favour of the smaller Aegean islands and amending Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 ( COM(2006)0264 – C6-0232/2006 – 2006/0093(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0264 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0264 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0232/2006 ),
having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0232/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0244/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0244/2006 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o posebnih ukrepih za spodbujanje gojenja sviloprejk (kodificirana različica) ( KOM(2006)0004 – C6-0042/2006 – 2006/0003(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation laying down special measures to encourage silkworm rearing (codified version) ( COM(2006)0004 – C6-0042/2006 – 2006/0003(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0004 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0004 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0042/2006 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0042/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0259/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0259/2006 ),
poziva Svet, naj obvesti Parlament, če namerava zavrniti besedilo, ki ga je Parlament odobril;
Calls on the Council to inform Parliament if it intends to reject the text approved by Parliament;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Direktive Sveta o oprostitvi davkov na uvoz manjših pošiljk blaga nekomercialnega značaja iz tretjih držav (kodificirana različica) ( KOM(2006)0012 – C6-0059/2006 – 2006/0007(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council directive on the exemption from taxes of imports of small consignments of goods of a non-commercial character from third-countries (codified version) ( COM(2006)0012 – C6-0059/2006 – 2006/0007(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0012 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0012 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 93 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0059/2006 ),
having regard to Article 93 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0059/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0258/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0258/2006 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1788/2003 o uvedbi dajatve v sektorju mleka in mlečnih proizvodov ( KOM(2006)0330 – C6-0234/2006 – 2006/0108(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1788/2003 establishing a levy in the milk and milk products sector ( COM(2006)0330 – C6-0234/2006 – 2006/0108(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0330 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0330 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0234/2006 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0234/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0245/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0245/2006 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Rotterdamske konvencije o postopku soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju za določene nevarne kemikalije in pesticide v mednarodni trgovini v imenu Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0250 – C6-0186/2006 – 2006/0080(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Rotterdam Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for certain hazardous chemicals and pesticides in international trade ( COM(2006)0250 – C6-0186/2006 – 2006/0080(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0250 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0250 ) Not yet published in OJ.