natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če se varuh človekovih pravic med preiskavami seznani z dejstvi, ki se po njegovem mnenju nanašajo na kazensko pravo, prek stalnih predstavništev držav članic v Evropskih skupnostih takoj obvesti pristojne nacionalne organe
If, in the course of inquiries, he learns of facts which he considers might relate to criminal law, the Ombudsman shall immediately notify the competent national authorities via the Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Communities
po potrebi tudi institucijo Skupnosti, pod katero zadevni uradnik ali uslužbenec spada in ki lahko uporabi drugi odstavek člena 18 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
if appropriate, the Community institution with authority over the official or servant concerned, which may apply the second paragraph of Article 18 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities.
Če se varuh človekovih pravic med preiskavami seznani z dejstvi, ki se po njegovem mnenju nanašajo na kazensko pravo, prek stalnih predstavništev držav članic v Evropskih skupnostih
If, in the course of inquiries, he learns of facts which he considers might relate to criminal law, the Ombudsman shall immediately notify the competent national authorities via the Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Communities
ali pristojnih institucij ali organov Skupnosti
or the competent Community institution or body;
varuh obvesti
the Ombudsman shall also notify
tudi institucijo
the Community institution
ali organ
or body
Skupnosti, pod katero zadevni uradnik ali uslužbenec spada in ki lahko uporabi drugi odstavek člena 18 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
with authority over the official or servant concerned, which may apply the second paragraph of Article 18 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities.
Predlog spremembe 7 Člen 5
Amendment 7 Article 5
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 o darovanju in presajanju organov: politični ukrepi na ravni EU ( 2007/2210(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 22 April 2008 on organ donation and transplantation: Policy actions at EU level (2007/2210 (INI))
ob upoštevanju člena 152(4)(a) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 152(4)(a) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o darovanju in presajanju organov: politični ukrepi na ravni EU ( KOM(2007)0275 ) in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije, ki je priložen sporočilu: Povzetek ocene učinkov SEK(2007)0705 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication to the European Parliament and the Council on Organ Donation and Transplantation: Policy Actions at EU level (COM (2007)0275) and the Commission Staff Working Document accompanying the Communication: Summary of the Impact Assessment ( SEC(2007)0705 ),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/23/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o določitvi standardov kakovosti in varnosti, darovanja, pridobivanja, testiranja, predelave, konzerviranja, shranjevanja in razdeljevanja človeških tkiv in celic UL L 102, 7.4.2004, str.
having regard to Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells OJ L 102, 7.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij UL L 201, 31.7.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2001/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. aprila 2001 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z izvajanjem dobre klinične prakse pri kliničnem preskušanju zdravil za ljudi UL L 121, 1.5.2001, str.
having regard to Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use OJ L 121, 1.5.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju vodilnih načel Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije o presajanju človeških organov,
having regard to the World Health Organization's Guiding Principles on Human Organ Transplantation,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Sveta Evrope o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z biomedicino in njenega dodatnega protokola o presaditvi človeških organov in tkiv,
having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, and its additional protocol concerning Transplantation of Organs and Tissues of Human Origin,
ob upoštevanju poročila Sveta Evrope o napotkih za zagotavljanje varnosti in kakovosti organov, tkiv in celic Tretja izdaja, 2007.
having regard to the Council of Europe report "Guide to the safety and quality assurance for organs, tissues and cells" Third edition, 2007.
ob upoštevanju dokumenta s prvega srečanja nacionalnih strokovnjakov o darovanju in presajanju organov na ravni Skupnosti SANCO C6 EFZ/gsc D (2007) 360346
having regard to a document from the first national expert meeting on organ donation and transplantation at Community Level SANCO C6 EFZ/gsc D (2007) 360346
, ki je potekalo v Bruslju 13. septembra 2007,
, held in Brussels on 13 September 2007,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za pravne zadeve in Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0090/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0090/2008 ),
ker potrebe po presajanju organov v Evropski uniji naraščajo brez prestanka in hitreje, kot število darovanih organov; ker je na čakalnih listah v EU več kot 60 000 bolnikov, ki potrebujejo presaditev organov, in ker veliko število bolnikov zaradi kroničnega pomanjkanja organov umre; ker se čakalni seznami kljub porastu števila darovalcev niso skrajšali,
whereas the need for organ transplantation in the European Union has increased steadily and more rapidly than the number of organs donated, whereas there are more than 60 000 patients in need of transplants on waiting lists across the EU and whereas a significant number of patients die as a result of the chronic shortage of organs, whereas the increase in the number of donors does not lead to a reduction in the waiting lists,
ker se trgovina z organi, komercializacija in presaditveni turizem hitro razraščajo, kar ni v skladu s spoštovanjem človekovega dostojanstva; ker obstaja povezava med pomanjkanjem organov ter trgovino z njimi; ker je potrebnih več podatkov o trgovini z organi,
whereas organ trafficking, commercialism and transplant tourism, which are inconsistent with respect for human dignity, are rapidly developing; whereas there is a link between organ shortage and organ trafficking, whereas more data on organ trafficking are needed,
ker se pri izvajanju nezakonitih komercialnih presaditev organov varnostna vprašanja pogosto ne upoštevajo, kar lahko ogrozi življenje tako darovalca kot prejemnika,
whereas safety issues are often ignored when illegal commercial organ transplantation is practised, which may put the life of both the donor and the recipient at risk,
ker štiri države članice še niso ratificirale konvencije Združenih narodov proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu, pet držav članic ni ratificiralo protokola o preprečevanju, zatiranju in kaznovanju trgovine z ljudmi, predvsem ženskami in otroki, ki dopolnjuje omenjeno konvencijo (Palermski protokol), devet držav članic ni ratificiralo izbirnega protokola h konvenciji Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah glede prodaje otrok, otroške prostitucije in otroške pornografije, 17 držav članic pa še ni ratificiralo Konvencije Sveta Evrope o ukrepih za boj proti trgovini z ljudmi,
whereas four Member States have still not ratified the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, five Member States have not ratified its supplementary Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children ("the Palermo Protocol"), nine Member States have not ratified the UN Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, and 17 Member States have not ratified the Council of Europe's Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings.
ker postaja trgovina z organi in tkivi, kljub sedanjim razmeroma nizkim ocenam v primerjavi z drugimi oblikami nezakonite trgovine, vse večji svetovni problem, ki se pojavlja znotraj nacionalnih meja in sega čeznje, in ker jo usmerja povpraševanje (v EU je po ocenah 150–250 primerov letno),
whereas although current estimates put organ trafficking at a relatively low level among all forms of trafficking, trafficking in organs and tissues is becoming an increasing global problem which occurs within and across national borders and is demand-driven (there are an estimated 150-250 cases per year in the EU),
ker je trgovina z organi in tkivi oblika trgovine z ljudmi, ki vključuje resne kršitve temeljnih človekovih pravic, zlasti človekovega dostojanstva in telesne integritete, in ker lahko zmanjša zaupanje državljanov v zakoniti sistem za presajanje organov, kar lahko vodi v nadaljnje pomanjkanje prostovoljno darovanih organov in tkiv,
whereas trafficking in organs and tissues is a form of trafficking in human beings, which entails serious violations of fundamental human rights, and in particular of human dignity and physical integrity, and can undermine citizens' confidence in the legitimate transplantation system, which may lead to a further shortage of supply of voluntarily donated organs and tissues,
ker so kakovost, varnost, učinkovitost in preglednost bistvene, če želi družba izkoristiti možnosti, ki jih lahko presajanje ponudi kot vrsta zdravljenja,
whereas quality, safety, efficacy and transparency are essential if society is to reap the benefits transplantation can offer as a therapy,
ker je presajanje organov edini način zdravljenja, ki je na voljo ob dokončni odpovedi organov, kot so jetra, pljuča in srce, in ker je tako zdravljenje pri dokončni ledvični odpovedi stroškovno najučinkovitejše; ker je mogoče s presaditvijo organa rešiti življenje in izboljšati njegovo kakovost,
whereas organ transplantation is the only available treatment for end-stage failure of organs such as the liver, lung and heart and the most cost-effective treatment for end-stage kidney failure; whereas organ transplantation makes it possible to save lives and to offer a better quality of life,
ker obstajajo med državami članicami in v državah samih pomembne razlike v številu presaditev in virih organov (ali je daroval živi ali umrli darovalec) ter celo neskladja v zahtevah glede kakovosti in minimalnih varnostnih zahtevah pri darovanju in presajanju organov, hkrati pa se organizacijski pristop k presajanju od države članice do države članice razlikuje, zaradi česar v EU obstajajo neenotni standardi,
whereas there are significant differences between and within Member States with respect to rates of transplant and to the source (that is to say the living or deceased donor) of organs, and even discrepancies in quality and minimum safety requirements for organ donation and transplantation, while the organisational approach to transplantation varies from Member State to Member State, resulting in uneven standards across the EU,
ker se pravni sistemi v državah članicah razlikujejo (nekater države članice imajo sistem privolitev, druge pa sistem zavrnitve) in izkušnje različnih držav članic kažejo, da je vpliv pravnega sistema na število darovalcev precej omejen,
whereas Member States have different legal frameworks (with some Member States having an opt-in and others an opt-out system in place) and experiences in different Member States show that the impact of the legal system on the number of donors is quite limited,
ker lahko presaditev pogosto nadomesti le intenzivna nega, ki je za bolnika neprijetna in obremeni zdravstveni sistem ter družino in negovalce bolnikov,
whereas the alternative to transplantation is often intensive care, which is unpleasant for the patient and places a burden on healthcare systems and the family and carers of patients,
ker sta darovanje in presajanje organov občutljivi in zapleteni vprašanji, ki ne vključujeta le medicinskih, ampak tudi pravne in etične vidike ter za svoj razvoj potrebujeta sodelovanje celotne civilne družbe,
whereas organ donation and transplantation are sensitive and complex issues that encompass not only medical but also legal and ethical aspects, and require the full participation of civil society for their development,
ker pri uporabi organov za zdravljenje obstaja tveganje prenosa nalezljivih in drugih bolezni,
whereas the use of organs in therapy involves a risk of transmission of infectious and other diseases,
ker obstoječe izkušnje (na primer. španski model, belgijski projekt GIFT,DOPKI in Zveza za darovanje in presajanje organov) kažejo, da so rezultati dobri in jih je treba upoštevati,
whereas existing experience (for example the Spanish model, the Belgian GIFT project, DOPKI and the Alliance for Organ Donation and Transplantation (Alliance-O)) shows positive results and should be taken into account,
ker imajo ozaveščanje javnosti, jasne in pozitivne informacije ter visoke izobraževalne in komunikacijske sposobnosti strokovnjakov pomembno vlogo pri povečevanju pripravljenosti za darovanje organov,
whereas public awareness, concrete and positive information and the advanced training and communication skills of professionals have an important role to play in increasing willingness to donate organs,
ker je treba uvesti učinkovite ukrepe javnega zdravja za pospešitev zgodnjega odkrivanja in obvladovanja kroničnih bolezni, ki povzročajo odpovedi organov, kot je kronična bolezen ledvic, da bi karseda zmanjšali število ljudi, ki bodo v prihodnje potrebovali presaditev organov ali ledvic;
whereas effective public health measures to facilitate the early detection and management of the chronic diseases that cause organ failure, such as chronic kidney disease, need to be introduced in order to minimise the number of people needing organ transplants in the future,
pozdravlja zgoraj omenjeno Sporočilo Komisije, v katerem je predlagan zelo dobrodošel integriran tristebrni pristop;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission Communication which proposes a very welcome integrated three-pillar approach;
Pravni instrument
Legal instrument
pričakuje predlog direktive Komisije, ki bo določil zahteve glede kakovosti in varnosti darovanja, pridobivanja, testiranja, shranjevanja, prevoza in dodeljevanja organov po vsej EU in sredstva, potrebna za izvajanje teh zahtev; vseeno poudarja, da prihodnji zakonodajni okvir ne sme dodatno upravno obremeniti držav članic ali ponudnikov storitev niti ogroziti uporabe sedanjih primerov dobre prakse ali prakse, prilagojene najpogostejšim pogojem in okoliščinam v posameznih državah članicah, ali vsebovati zahtev, zaradi katerih bi se zmanjšalo število potencialnih in dejanskih darovalcev;
Looks forward to the Commission proposal for a Directive laying down quality and safety requirements for organ donation, procurement, testing, preservation, transport and allocation across the EU and the resources necessary to meet those requirements; stresses, nonetheless, that the forthcoming legislative framework should not create an additional administrative burden for Member States or service providers, nor should it jeopardize the use of existing good practices or those practices adapted to the prevailing conditions and circumstances in individual Member States, or contain requirements which would lead to a decrease in the number of potential and actual donors;
poudarja, da bi morala nova direktiva dopolniti in okrepiti prizadevanje držav članic za doseganje dejavne in učinkovite metode usklajevanja, ne da bi se pri tem preprečevala uvedba ali ohranitev strožjih ukrepov;
Points out that the new Directive should complement and reinforce efforts made by Member States to achieve an active and efficient method of coordination without preventing the introduction or maintenance of more stringent measures;
poudarja, da bi morala direktiva upoštevati napredek medicinske znanosti;
Underlines that the Directive should accommodate the progress made by medical science;
Sodelovanje med državami članicami
Co-operation between Member States
je zaskrbljen, ker je človeških organov za presaditev na voljo premalo, da bi zadovoljili potrebe bolnikov; meni, da je omejitev pomanjkanja organov in darovalcev glavni izziv, s katerim se soočajo države članice v zvezi s presajanjem organov; opozarja, da je trenutno na tisoče bolnikov vpisanih na čakalne sezname v Evropi, na katerih je stopnja umrljivosti zelo visoka;
Expresses its concern over the insufficiency of available organs for transplantation to meet patient needs; considers reducing the organ and donor shortage to be the main challenge that Member States face with regard to organ transplantation; recalls that many thousands of patients in Europe are currently registered on waiting lists, which have a significant mortality rate;
ugotavlja, da mora dodeljevanje organov temeljiti na zdravstveni sposobnosti bolnika za sprejem organa; meni, da je diskriminacija zaradi invalidnosti, ki ne vpliva na možnosti bolnika, da bo njegovo telo organ sprejelo, nesprejemljiva;
Notes that the allocation of organs should be based on the medical capacity of the patient to accept an organ; is of the opinion that discrimination on the basis of disabilities which have no bearing on the patient's chances of accepting an organ should not be tolerated;
poudarja, da je darovanje organov darilo in da je zato pri iskanju rešitve za resno pomanjkanje organov v EU izjemno pomembno spoštovati in varovati svobodo izbire pri odločanju o tem, ali bo nekdo daroval organe ali ne;
Points out that organ donation is a gift; therefore stresses that, while finding an answer to the severe shortage of organs in the EU is extremely important, the freedom of choice as to whether or not to donate an organ needs to be respected and protected as well;
je seznanjen s pomembnimi razlikami v zvezi z virom organov (umrli ali živi darovalci) v EU, precejšnimi razlikami med državami članicami pri uspešnosti širjenja kroga darovalcev, neskladnosti med državami članicami pri zahtevah glede kakovosti in varnosti, različnimi organizacijskimi pristopi k darovanju in presajanju organov ter razlikami v izobrazbi in usposobljenosti medicinskega in paramedicinskega osebja; meni, da neskladja delno pojasnjuje kombinacija gospodarskih, strukturnih, upravnih, kulturnih, etičnih, verskih, zgodovinskih, družbenih in pravnih dejavnikov, čeprav je odločilen dejavnik očitno to, kako poteka celoten postopek pred darovanjem in presaditvijo;
Takes note of the significant differences as regards the source of organs (deceased or living donors) within the EU, the substantial differences between Member States' success in increasing their donor pool, the discrepancies between Member States concerning quality and safety requirements, the different organisational approaches to organ donation and transplantation and the differences in the education and training of medical and paramedical professionals; considers that discrepancies can be partly explained by a combination of economic, structural, administrative, cultural, ethical, religious, historical, social and legal factors, although the critical factor seems to be how the whole process leading to donation and transplantation is organised;
zato trdno verjame, da imajo države članice veliko možnosti za delitev strokovnega znanja in izkušenj, z namenom povečanja števila darovalcev ter izenačenja dostopa do presajanja v vsej EU; zato pričakuje akcijski načrt Komisije za okrepljeno sodelovanje med državami članicami, da se
Strongly believes, therefore, that there is significant potential for sharing expertise between Member States in order to increase donor rates and equalise access to transplantation across the EU; hence, looks forward to the Commission's action plan for strengthened cooperation between Member States in order to:
poveča razpoložljivost organov,
increase organ availability,
izboljšata učinkovitost in dostopnost sistemov za presajanje organov,
enhance the efficiency and accessibility of transplantation systems,
poveča javna osveščenost,
increase public awareness,
zagotovita kakovost in varnost;
guarantee quality and safety;
zato poudarja, da sta oblikovanje dobro strukturiranih operativnih sistemov in spodbujanje uspešnih modelov znotraj držav članic in med njimi ter, če je smotrno, na mednarodni ravni izredno pomembna; predlaga, da so operativni sistemi setavljeni iz ustreznega pravnega okvira, tehnične in logistične infrastrukture, psihološke in organizacijske podpore in ustrezne organizacijske strukture na bolnišnični in nadbolnišnični ravni, v kateri bo visoko usposobljeno osebje, in povezani z jasnimi določbami o sledljivosti ter pravičnim, učinkovitim in poštenim sistemom dodeljevanja in dostopa do sistema za presajanje organov;
Consequently, stresses that the establishment of well-structured operational systems and the promotion of successful models within and between Member States, and where appropriate at international level, are of the utmost importance; suggests that operational systems should be composed of an adequate legal framework, technical and logistical infrastructure, psychological and organisational support and an appropriate organisational structure, at hospital and supra-hospital level, equipped with highly qualified staff, coupled with clear provisions on traceability and a fair, effective and equitable allocation and access to transplantation system;
Povečanje razpoložljivosti organov
Increasing organ availability
poudarja, da so države članice same odgovorne za svoj pravni model; ugotavlja, da v EU obstajata dva modela, ki imata vsak še različne oblike; meni, da pravnih sistemov ni treba prilagajati ali usklajevati; poziva države članice, naj sprejmejozakonodajo, ki omogoča določitev nacionalnega predstavnika, ki lahko odloča o darovanju po tem, ko oseba umre;
Points out that Member States are responsible for their own legal models; notes that in the EU two models exist, each with different variants; considers it unnecessary to adapt or harmonise legal systems; invites Member States to adopt legislation enabling the appointment of a legal representative who can decide on donation after a person's death;
poziva države članice, naj v celoti izkoristijo možnosti posmrtnega darovanja; zato poziva države članice, naj čim več vlagajo v izboljšanje svojih organizacijskih sistemov, tako da:
Calls on Member States to achieve the full potential of post-mortem donations; therefore urges Member States to invest to the full in improving their organisational system by:
osveščajo, izobražujejo in usposabljajo medicinsko in paramedicinsko osebje,
sensitizing, educating and training medical and paramedical staff,