natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
E. ker člen 43 Listine navaja, da imajo vsaka državljanka in vsak državljan Unije ter vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij ali organov Skupnosti obrnejo na varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča v njegovi pravosodni funkciji,
E. whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘Any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice acting in its judicial role’,
F. ker je Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe v večini držav članic postala pravno zavezujoča, s čimer so sklepi Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic dobili dodatno legitimnost,
F. whereas the Charter for Fundamental Rights of the European Union has become legally binding in most Member States following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, conferring additional legitimacy on the decisions of the European Ombudsman ,
G. ker je uveljavitev Lizbonske pogodbe uvedla pravno podlago za skupna pravila upravnih postopkov v institucijah, organih, uradih in agencijah EU, katere v skladu s členom 298 PDEU „podpira odprta, učinkovita in neodvisna evropska uprava“, in ker vpliva na delo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, med drugim zaradi ustanovitve Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje in dejstva, da je Evropski svet postal ena od institucij EU,
G. whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty introduced a legal basis for common rules on administrative procedures within the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, which pursuant to Article 298 of the TFEU ‘shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration’, as well as having an impact on the work of the European Ombudsman, inter alia as a result of the establishment of the European External Action Service and the fact that the European Council has become an EU institution,
H. ker do nepravilnosti pride, kadar javni organ ne deluje v skladu z zanj zavezujočimi pravili ali načeli,
H. whereas maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it,
I. ker je Parlament na plenarnem zasedanju 20. januarja 2010 v Strasbourgu ponovno izvolil Nikiforosa Diamandurosa za evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, ki je 25. oktobra 2010 prisegel pred Sodiščem Evropske unije v Luksemburgu,
I. whereas Mr Diamandouros was re-elected European Ombudsman by Parliament in its plenary session in Strasbourg on 20 January 2010 and took his oath before the Court of Justice in Luxembourg on 25 October 2010,
J. ker je institucija evropskega varuha človekovih pravic 27. septembra 2010 praznovala petnajsto obletnico; ker je varuh človekovih pravic v tem desetletju in pol odgovoril več kot 36 000 pritožnikom in zaključil več kot 3800 preiskav morebitnih nepravilnosti,
J. whereas on 27 September 2010 the European Ombudsman institution celebrated its fifteenth anniversary; whereas in this decade and a half the Ombudsman has answered more than 36 000 complainants and completed more than 3 800 inquiries into possible maladministration,
K. ker je varuh človekovih pravic izkoristil petnajsto obletnico institucije za začetek nove strategije za svoj mandat 2009–2014; ker so cilji te strategije prisluhniti zainteresiranim stranem, hitreje dosegati rezultate, pozitivno vplivati na upravno kulturo Unije, zainteresiranim stranem in javnosti zagotavljati pravočasne in koristne informacije ter stalno tehtati uporabo razpoložljivih sredstev,
K. whereas the Ombudsman used the fifteenth anniversary of his institution to launch a new strategy for his 2009-2014 mandate; whereas this strategy focuses on listening to stakeholders, delivering results faster, impacting positively on the Union’s administrative culture, providing timely and useful information to stakeholders and the public, and rethinking constantly the use of the resources available,
L. ker je bilo v letu 2010 na varuha človekovih pravic naslovljenih 2667 pritožb; ker to pomeni več kot 400 pritožb manj v primerjavi z letom 2009,
L. whereas in 2010 the Ombudsman received 2 667 complaints; whereas this represents a decline of more than 400 compared to 2009,
M. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 zaključil 326 preiskav (leta 2009 pa 318), od katerih je bilo 323 začetih na podlagi pritožb; ker se je povprečni čas, potreben za končanje preiskav, v letih 2009 in 2010 skrajšal s 13 mesecev v letu 2008 na 9 mesecev; ker je bila večina preiskav zaključena v enem letu (66 %), več kot polovica (52 %) pa v treh mesecih,
M. whereas in 2010 the Ombudsman completed 326 inquiries (318 in 2009) of which 323 were based on complaints; whereas the average time required for completing inquiries fell from 13 months in 2008 to 9 months in 2009 and 2010; whereas most of the inquiries were completed within one year (66 %) and over half (52 %) were completed within three months,
N. ker lahko varuh človekovih pravic začne preiskave na lastno pobudo, če želi preiskati domnevne primere nepravilnosti na podlagi pritožbe nepooblaščene osebe ali če obstaja verjetnost sistemske težave v institucijah; ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 končal tri in začel šest preiskav na lastno pobudo,
N. whereas the Ombudsman can launch own-initiative inquiries when he intends to investigate a possible case of maladministration based on a complaint by a non-authorised person or when there appears to be a systemic problem in the institutions; whereas the Ombudsman completed three and opened six own-initiative inquiries in 2010,
O. ker je 65 % preiskav, odprtih leta 2010, zadevalo Evropsko komisijo (leta 2009 56 %), 10 % Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO), 7 % Evropski parlament, 2 % Svet Evropske unije in 1 % Sodišče Evropske unije,
O. whereas 65 % of inquiries opened in 2010 concerned the European Commission (56 % in 2009), 10 % concerned the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), 7 % the European Parliament, 2 % the Council of the European Union, and 1 % the Court of Justice of the European Union,
P. ker so v več kot polovici zadev (55 %), zaključenih leta 2010, zadevne institucije sprejele sporazumno rešitev ali zadevo rešile,
P. whereas in over half (55 %) of the cases closed in 2010 the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter,
Q. ker lahko varuh človekovih pravic izda dodatne pripombe, če se pri obravnavi zadeve pojavi priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti uprave; ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 izdal dodatne pripombe v 14 zadevah (v primerjavi z 28 leta 2009), da bi izboljšal kakovost storitev, ki se zagotavljajo državljanom,
Q. whereas the Ombudsman may issue a further remark if, in dealing with a case, an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration is identified; whereas the Ombudsman issued further remarks in 14 cases in 2010 (down from 28 in 2009) with a view to enhancing the quality of the service provided to citizens,
R. ker se kritična ocena pripravi, kadar (i) pristojna institucija ne more več odpraviti nepravilnosti, (ii) kadar nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic ali (iii) kadar ni potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje varuha človekovih pravic,
R. whereas a critical remark is made in cases where (i) it is no longer possible for the institution concerned to eliminate the maladministration, (ii) where the maladministration has no general implications or (iii) where no follow-up by the Ombudsman is deemed necessary,
S. ker kritična ocena pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, instituciji pa nakaže, kje je storila napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje; ker se je v zadnjih nekaj letih število kritičnih ocen nenehno zmanjševalo ter je padlo s 44 leta 2008 na 35 leta 2009 in 33 leta 2010,
S. whereas a critical remark confirms to the complainant that the complaint was justified and indicates to the institution what it has done wrong, so it can avoid maladministration in the future; whereas over the last few years the number of critical remarks has been showing a continual decrease, falling from 44 in 2008 and 35 in 2009 to 33 in 2010,
T. ker se osnutek priporočila izda, če je potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje varuha človekovih pravic, če je mogoče nepravilnost odpraviti ali če je nepravilnost posebej resna ali ima splošne posledice,
T. whereas a draft recommendation is issued in cases where follow-up action by the Ombudsman is necessary, where the maladministration can be eliminated or where the maladministration is particularly serious or has general implications,
U. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 ugotovil nepravilnosti v 12 % zadev (40); ker je z izdajo osnutkov priporočil dosegel pozitivne rezultate v sedmih od teh zadev,
U. whereas the Ombudsman identified instances of maladministration in 12 % of the cases (40) in 2010; whereas he obtained positive outcomes in seven of these cases by making draft recommendations,
V. ker lahko varuh, če se institucija ali organ na osnutek priporočila ne odzove zadovoljivo, Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje posebno poročilo,
V. whereas if an institution or body fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation, the Ombudsman may send a special report to the European Parliament,
W. ker je posebno poročilo varuhovo orožje v skrajni sili in je zadnji bistveni korak, ki ga stori pri obravnavi zadeve, saj je sprejetje resolucije in izvajanje parlamentarnih pooblastil stvar politične presoje Parlamenta,
W. whereas a special report constitutes the Ombudsman’s ultimate weapon and is the last substantive step he takes in dealing with a case, since the adoption of a resolution and the exercise of Parliament’s powers are matters for the political judgment of the Parliament,
X. ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2010 predložil Parlamentu eno posebno poročilo,
X. whereas the Ombudsman submitted one special report to Parliament in 2010,
3. poudarja, da so preglednost, dostop do informacij in spoštovanje pravic evropskih državljanov bistveni predpogoji za ohranjanje zaupanja med državljani in institucijami;
Stresses that transparency, access to information and respect for the rights of European citizens are essential preconditions for maintaining trust between citizens and the institutions;
5. opozarja, da je institucija evropskega varuha človekovih pravic 27. septembra 2010 praznovala petnajsto obletnico; ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic v teh petnajstih letih odgovoril na več kot 36 000 pritožb in bistveno pomagal evropskim institucijam pri izboljševanju stanja in povečevanju kakovosti uprave;
Recalls that the European Ombudsman institution on 27 September 2010 celebrated its fifteenth anniversary; notes that over these fifteen years the Ombudsman has responded to more than 36 000 complaints and played a major role in helping the European institutions to provide redress and to raise the quality of their administration;
8. pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU; potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma in dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies; endorses the Ombudsman in his role of external control mechanism and as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
11. predlaga, da bi morali biti na seji Odbora za peticije, na kateri varuh človekovih pravic predstavi svoje letno poročilo, poleg predstavnikov Evropske komisije navzoči tudi predstavniki zadevnih uprav Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in drugih institucij, agencij, služb in organov EU, ki so predmet preiskave, posebnega poročila, kritičnih ocen ali drugih ukrepov varuha človekovih pravic, da bi komentirali poročilo in sodelovali v razpravi; poziva predstavnike uprave Parlamenta, Sveta in drugih zadevnih institucij, agencij in organov EU, naj bodo navzoči na prihodnjih sejah, na katerih bo predstavljeno letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic in bo potekala razprava o njem; meni, da bi slednji s svojo udeležbo na takšnih razpravah in z deljenjem svojih pogledov o dobrem upravljanju in težavah, premaganih s pomočjo priporočil in pripomb Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, lahko pripomogli k izboljšanju storitev za državljane EU in medinstitucionalnega dialoga ter prispevali k vzpostavitvi prave kulture storitev;
Suggests that when the Ombudsman presents his annual report in a meeting of the Committee on Petitions, not only representatives of the European Commission but also of the respective administrations of the European Parliament, the Council and other EU institutions, agencies, services and bodies that have been the subject of an investigation, a special report, critical remarks or other measures taken by the Ombudsman should be present to comment on the report and take part in the discussion; urges the administrations of Parliament, the Council and the other EU institutions, agencies and bodies concerned to be represented in future meetings when the Ombudsman’s annual report is presented and discussed; believes that their participation in such discussions and the sharing of their views on good administration and on the problems overcome as a result of the European Ombudsman’s recommendations and remarks could help to improve the service provided to EU citizens and interinstitutional dialogue and contribute to the establishment of a genuine service culture;
16. poudarja, da mora Parlament nameniti sredstva za vzpostavitev podobnega spletnega portala za svoj Odbor za peticije, da bi se okrepila vidnost in preglednost naše institucije, tako da bi lahko prispevala tudi k zmanjšanju števila nedopustnih peticij ter hkrati usmerjala predlagatelje peticij in jim svetovala ter izboljšala učinkovitost in uspešnost postopka za peticije;
Emphasises that Parliament itself must release resources to put in place a similar web portal for its Committee on Petitions to enhance the institution’s visibility and transparency in order that it may also contribute to a reduction in the number of inadmissible petitions while at the same time providing guidance and advice to petitioners and improving the efficiency and the effectiveness of the petitions process;
18. varuhu človekovih pravic čestita za dejstvo, da se povprečni čas, potreben za zaključek preiskav, neprestano krajša (približno 9 mesecev v letih 2009 in 2010); zahteva, da se uporabijo ustrezni ukrepi, da se ta čas še skrajša, da bi se tako bolje izpolnila pričakovanja državljanov EU;
Congratulates the Ombudsman on the fact that the average time required for completing inquiries is becoming shorter and shorter (approximately nine months in 2009 and 2010); requests that the necessary means are used to reduce it still further in order to be more able to better meet the expectations of EU citizens;
23. poziva k sprožitvi kampanje obveščanja, katere namen je prepričati uslužbence institucij EU o tem, da je varuh človekovih pravic pripravljen prisluhniti in razpravljati o različnih vprašanjih, ter izpostaviti prednosti njegovega posredovanja, za približanje institucij EU državljanom;
Calls for the launch of an information campaign designed to reassure the staff of the EU institutions as to the Ombudsman’s willingness to listen and discuss issues, and to highlight the advantages of intervention by the Ombudsman with a view to bringing the administrations of the EU institutions closer to EU citizens;
25. opozarja, da prenavljanje Uredbe (ES) 1049/2001 še vedno poteka; obžaluje pomanjkanje napredka pri tem postopku; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj bosta bolj odprta pri zagotavljanju dostopa do dokumentov in informacij za državljane in Evropski parlament;
Recalls that the recast of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 is still ongoing; regrets the lack of progress in the recast procedure; urges the Council and the Commission to be more open to giving access to documents and information to citizens and to the European Parliament;
28. predlaga, naj se ta izjava o načelih javne službe čim bolj široko razširja in naj se zagotovi njena enostavna dostopnost državljanom EU, da se slednji prepričajo o zavezi EU k zaščiti javnih služb, ki so del njihovega vsakdana;
Proposes that this statement of public service principles be disseminated as widely as possible and made easily accessible to EU citizens, so as to reassure them of the EU’s commitment to protecting public services, which are a feature of their day-to-day lives;
Evropski parlament je na plenarnem zasedanju 20. januarja 2010 v Strasbourgu za evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ponovno izvolil Nikiforosa Diamandurosa, ki je 25. oktobra 2010 slovesno prisegel pred Sodiščem Evropske unije v Luxembourgu.
Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, the European Ombudsman, was re-elected by the European Parliament in its plenary Strasbourg session on 20 January 2010 and he took the solemn oath of office before the Court of Justice of the European Union in Luxembourg on 25 October 2010.
Pravna podlaga za mandat evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je člen 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), v skladu s katerim je pristojen za sprejemanje pritožb v zvezi z nepravilnostmi pri dejavnostih institucij Evropske unije
The legal base for the European Ombudsman's mandate is Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and he is empowered to receive complaints concerning instances of maladministration in the activities of European Union institutions
4 Za namene tega dokumenta izraz „institucija“ zajema tudi organe, agencije in pisarne Unije. .
4 For the purposes of this document the term ‘Institution’ also comprises the Union’s bodies, agencies and offices. .
Pravica do pritožbe pri evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic je zagotovljena v členu 24 PDEU in členu 43 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The right to complain to the European Ombudsman is provided for in Article 24 of the TFEU and in Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je bil mandat varuha človekovih pravic razširjen, tako da vključuje morebitne nepravilnosti v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike ter skupne varnostne in obrambne politike.
With the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the Ombudsman's mandate was broadened to include possible maladministration in the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), including the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).
Varuh človekovih pravic je nepravilnosti opredelil, Evropski parlament in Komisija pa to opredelitev potrdila, kot delovanje javnega organa, ki ni v skladu z zanj zavezujočimi pravili ali načeli.
The Ombudsman's definition of maladministration, which is endorsed by the European Parliament and the European Commission, is that: "Maladministration occurs when a public body fails to act in accordance with a rule or principle which is binding upon it".
Za institucije to pomeni, da morajo spoštovati načela pravne države, načela dobrega upravljanja in temeljne pravice.
For the institutions this implies respect for the rule of law, for the principles of good administration and for fundamental rights.
Listina o temeljnih pravicah vključuje pravico do dobrega upravljanja kot temeljno pravico državljanov EU (člen 41), ki je za upravo institucij EU zavezujoča.
The Charter of Fundamental Rights includes the right to good administration as a fundamental right for EU citizens (Article 41) and the Charter is binding upon the administrations of EU institutions.
Institucija evropskega varuha človekovih pravic je 27. septembra 2010 praznovala 15. obletnico.
On 27 September 2010 the institution of the European Ombudsman's celebrated its 15th anniversary.
V teh petnajstih letih je obravnavala več kot 36 000 pritožb in zaključila več kot 3800 preiskav domnevnih nepravilnosti.
In these fifteen years the institution has dealt with more than 36 000 complaints and completed more than 3 800 inquiries into possible maladministration.
Z obravnavanjem tako velikega števila pritožb si je ta institucija nabrala bistvene izkušnje, ki varuhu človekovih pravic omogočajo jasen vpogled v trende na področju nepravilnosti, sistemskih težav in strukturnih pomanjkljivosti v upravah institucij EU.
The result of processing so many complaints is that the institution has accumulated a considerable body of experience which gives the Ombudsman a clear insight into trends in maladministration, systemic problems and structural weaknesses in the administrations of EU institutions.
To mu omogoča reševanje napak, povečevanje kakovosti uprav EU ter zagotavljanje širitve in uporabe dobrih praks.
This enables him to provide redress, to help raise the quality of EU administrations and to help ensure that good practices are being spread and applied.
Letno poročilo 2010 varuha človekovih pravic ima novo podobo, leta 2010 pa sta tako varuh kot evropska mreža varuhov človekovih pravic privzela nov logotip.
The Ombudsman's Annual Report 2010 has a new look and in 2010 both the Ombudsman and the European Network of Ombudsmen have taken on a new logo.
Zaradi povratnih informacij bralcev ter upoštevanja nove vizualne podobe in čim učinkovitejšo uporabo sredstev spremenjeno letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic ne vsebuje več običajnega uvoda in povzetka, ampak ima zdaj priložen ločen pregled, v katerem so izpostavljena pomembna področja v letu poročanja.
Based on feedback from readers and to reflect the institution's new visual identity, while at the same time aiming to make the best possible use of resources, the Ombudsman's revamped annual report no longer contains the traditional Introduction and Executive Summary but now comes with a separate Overview in which the Ombudsman draws attention to the highlights of the reporting year.
Leta 2010 je varuh človekovih pravic registriral 2667 pritožb državljanov, podjetij, združenj, nevladnih organizacij in regionalnih pisarn (3098 leta 2009), obravnaval pa skupaj 2727 pritožb.
In 2010 the Ombudsman registered 2 667 complaints from citizens, companies, associations, NGOs and regional offices (3 098 in 2009) and he processed a total number of 2 727.
Od teh pritožb jih je 744 (27 %) sodilo v njegove pristojnosti.
Of these complaints 744 (27%) were within his mandate.
Skoraj 58 % pritožb, prejetih leta 2010, je bilo vloženih prek spleta.
Almost 58% of the complaints received in 2010 were submitted using the internet.
Varuh človekovih pravic je zaključil 326 preiskav na podlagi pritožb in začel dvanajst preiskav na lastno pobudo.
The Ombudsman completed 326 inquiries on the basis of complaints and launched twelve own-initiative inquiries.
Varuh človekovih pravic po možnosti skuša doseči pozitiven rezultat s prizadevanjem za sporazumno rešitev, ki je sprejemljiva tako za pritožnika kot za zadevno institucijo.
When possible the Ombudsman tries to achieve a positive outcome by working towards a friendly solution that is satisfactory to both the complainant and the institution concerned.
Leta 2010 je bila v 179 zadevah dosežena sporazumna rešitev.
In 2010 friendly solutions were found in 179 cases.
Če sporazumne rešitve ni mogoče doseči, varuh zadevo zaključi s kritično oceno ali pripravi osnutek priporočila.
If however a friendly solution cannot be reached the Ombudsman either closes the case with a critical remark or a he makes a draft recommendation.
Kritična ocena se pripravi v primerih, ko institucija ne more več odpraviti nepravilnosti, ko nepravilnost nima splošnih posledic ali ko ni potrebno nadaljnje ukrepanje varuha človekovih pravic.
A critical remark is made when it is no longer possible for the institution to eliminate the instance of maladministration, the maladministration has no general implications or no follow-up action by the Ombudsman is required.