natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da je Evropski svet v Göteborgu 15. in 16. junija 2001 razširil lizbonske cilje s pojmi trajnosti in kohezije ter da si politika razvoja podeželja prizadeva za trajnostno kmetijstvo, ohranitev nekmetijskih dejavnosti na podeželju, povečanje potencialov lokalnega razvoja, varovanje okolja, uravnoteženo prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj malih in srednje velikih podjetij;
Recalls that the Gothenburg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001 expanded the Lisbon objectives to include the concepts of sustainability and cohesion and that rural development policy is geared towards sustainable farming, preserving non-agricultural rural activities, maximising the potential of local development, environmental protection, balanced regional planning and the development of SMEs;
je prepričan, da je za dobro izvajanje politike razvoja podeželja, katere cilj je zagotoviti dolgoročen trajnosti razvoj podeželskih območij, treba upoštevati naravne vire in posebnosti regij, vključno z varovanjem, spodbujanjem in upravljanjem podeželske dediščine, ter razvoj povezav in odnosov z urbanimi območji;
Believes that proper implementation of rural development policy, in view of the long-term sustainable development of rural areas, requires due account to be taken of each area's natural resources and specific features, including the protection, enhancement and management of the rural heritage, and of the development of links and interactions with urban areas;
poudarja tudi, da je pomembno ovrednotiti območja alternativnih gospodarskih dejavnosti in priložnosti za diverzifikacijo poklicnih dejavnosti prebivalstva, ki se porajajo na takih območjih;
Also stresses the importance of assessing areas of alternative economic activity and the opportunities arising from those areas for diversification of the population´s occupational activities;
meni, da terjajo bodoča vprašanja, s katerimi se bo srečevalo podeželje, uravnoteženo razvojno politiko, ki naj vključuje vse družbene in gospodarske subjekte, vključno z malimi in mikro podjetji v proizvodnem in storitvenem sektorju, glede na njihovo vlogo v celostnem lokalnem razvoju;
Believes that the future issues facing the countryside call for a balanced development policy encompassing all social and economic agents, including small businesses and micro-businesses in the production and service sectors, given their role in integrated local development;
meni, da mora biti politika razvoja podeželja v novih državah članicah osredotočena na izboljšanje učinkovitosti kmetijstva in zmanjševanje gospodarske razvojne vrzeli med podeželjem in mestom, med drugim s podpiranjem nekmetijskih dejavnosti, kar je cilj, ki ga je mogoče doseči tudi z uporabo strukturnih skladov;
Considers that, in the case of the new Member States, rural development policy must target improving the efficiency of agriculture and reducing the economic development gap between country and city, inter alia by supporting non-farming activities, an objective which can also be attained by using the Structural Funds;
pozdravlja ambicije, ki so bile izražene na drugi evropski konferenci o razvoju podeželja v Salzburgu leta 2003, vendar obžaluje, da se je z zadnjimi finančnimi perspektivami odobreno financiranje iz drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike občutno zmanjšalo, kar lahko povzroči neučinkovitost ter razhajanje med kmetom in prebivalcem podeželja;
Welcomes the ambitions set out at the Second European Conference on Rural Development in Salzburg in 2003 but regrets the fact that the funding granted under the second pillar of the CAP by the latest financial perspectives has been significantly reduced, risking inefficiency and creating a division between the farmer and the rural dweller;
poudarja, da obstaja potreba po skladni, dolgoročni strategiji za razvoj podeželja, da bi tako olajšali najuspešnejšo in najučinkovitejšo uporabo vseh razpoložljivih virov financiranja;
Points out that there is a need to develop a coherent, long-term rural development strategy in order to facilitate the most effective and efficient use of all available funding;
poziva države članice in regionalne organe, naj v sodelovanju s Komisijo ter v partnerstvu z vsemi pristojnimi oblastmi in organi, ki predstavljajo civilno družbo, pripravijo pregledno in dolgoročno strategijo za trajnosten razvoj podeželja na nacionalni in regionalni ravni, da se jasno opredelijo prednostne naloge in cilji pri razvoju podeželja ter se zagotovi prilagajanje, usklajevanje in dopolnjevanje pomoči iz različnih razpoložljivih virov;
Calls on Member States and regional authorities to formulate, in cooperation with the Commission and in partnership with all competent authorities and bodies representing civil society, a transparent, long-term, sustainable rural development strategy at national and regional level, in order to be able clearly to identify rural development priorities and objectives and ensure the adaptation, coordination and complementarity of the aid originating in the various sources of funding available;
poziva Komisijo, države članice in regionalne organe, naj zagotovijo, da bodo pri opredelitvi teh prednostnih nalog neposredno sodelovale organizacije, ki predstavljajo mala in srednje velika podjetja, mikro podjetja in obrtna podjetja, da bi se bolje odzvali na potrebe in pričakovanja teh podjetij;
Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the regional authorities to ensure the direct participation of the organisations representing SMEs, microbusinesses and craft undertakings, in order to identify those priorities with a view to responding in the best way possible to those enterprises' needs and expectations;
priznava, da ima politika razvoja podeželja zelo pomembno vlogo pri določanju in obravnavanju posebnih problemov na podeželskih območjih, ter meni, da oblikovanje Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja za drugi steber skupne kmetijske politike predstavlja poskus bolj prožnega, strateškega, tematskega in celovitega pristopa k odzivanju na raznolikost razmer in obseg izzivov, s katerimi se soočajo podeželska območja EU, ter poenostavitve postopkov financiranja in zagotavljanja, da bodo sredstva usmerjena na ta območja;
Recognises that rural development policy plays a hugely important role in targeting and addressing specific problems in rural areas and believes that the establishment of the EARDF for the second pillar of the CAP represents an attempt to have a flexible, strategic, thematic and integrated approach to respond to the diversity of situations and the scale of the challenges facing the EU's rural areas, and to simplify financing procedures and ensure that funds are focused on these areas;
opozarja, da so bile države članice pozvane, naj za to programsko obdobje pripravijo dva strateška dokumenta: nacionalni strateški načrt za razvoj podeželja in nacionalni strateški referenčni okvir za regionalno politiko (strukturni skladi); hkrati opozarja, da so bile države članice naprošene, naj med različnimi skladi sprožijo sinergijo in vzpostavijo delujoče usklajevalne mehanizme; obžaluje pa, da je bila pozornost v tem procesu namenjena predvsem razmejevanju različnih skladov in programov, ne pa ustvarjanju sinergije med njimi;
Recalls that the Member States have been called upon to prepare, for the current programming period, two strategic documents: a National Strategy Plan for rural development (EAFRD) and a National Strategic Reference Framework for regional policy (Structural Funds); recalls that the Member States have been asked to mobilise synergies and set up operational coordination mechanisms between the various funds; regrets, however, that in this process the emphasis was mainly placed on ensuring the demarcation of the various funds and programmes, rather than creating synergies from them;
meni, da je politika razvoja podeželja lahko učinkovita le, če so ukrepi, ki se izvajajo v okviru Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, in politika regionalnega razvoja usklajeni in dopolnjujoči, da bi se izognili dvojnemu financiranju in vrzelim; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja nezadostno usklajenost med temi ukrepi v posameznih državah članicah v sedanjem programskem obdobju; zato poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga reforme, s katerimi bo zagotovila boljše usklajevanje pri načrtovanju in izvajanju ukrepov, ki se sofinancirajo v sklopu kohezijske in skupne kmetijske politike; priznava, da bodo reforma skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013 in strukturni skladi EU priložnost za ponovno preučitev odnosov med razvojem podeželja na eni strani ter kmetijsko in kohezijsko politiko na drugi;
Considers that the efficiency of rural development policy can only be achieved if the measures implemented under EARDF and regional development policy are coordinated and complementary, so as to avoid double financing and gaps; notes with concern the insufficient coordination between those actions during the current programming period in the individual Member States; calls therefore on the Commission to propose reforms aimed at ensuring better coordination in the planning and implementation of measures co-financed under the cohesion policy and CAP; recognises that the post-2013 reform of the CAP and the EU Structural Funds will provide an opportunity to re-assess the relationship between rural development on one hand and agricultural policy and cohesion policy on the other;
priznava, da je prvotna vloga politike razvoja podeželja še naprej ohranjati prebivalstvo na podeželju in mu zagotoviti dostojen življenjski standard;
Recognises that the primary role of rural development policy is to continue to maintain the population of the countryside and ensure a decent standard of living for this rural population;
meni, da je treba pristop ločevanja politike razvoja podeželja od kohezijske politike z oblikovanjem Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja strogo nadzorovati, da bi ocenili njegov resnični vpliv na razvoj podeželskih območij; ugotavlja, da je bil nov sistem uveden leta 2007, zato je še prezgodaj za sklepanje o prihodnosti te politike Skupnosti;
Considers that the approach of separating rural development from cohesion policy with the creation of EAFRD needs to be monitored very closely in order to evaluate its true impact on the development of rural areas; notes that the new system was put in place in 2007 and that it is, therefore, too early for any conclusions to be reached with regard to the future of this Community policy;
poudarja, da je ena od prednostnih nalog politike razvoja podeželja predlagati ukrepe, ki nimajo za posledico, da mora podeželsko prebivalstvo opustiti kmetijstvo, in ki med drugim tudi spodbujajo konkurenčne kmetije, pridelavo bioloških izdelkov, visokokakovostne tradicionalne hrane in pijače;
Stresses that one of the priorities of rural development policy is to propose measures which do not result in the rural population having to abandon agriculture and which also help, inter alia, to promote competitive holdings, the production of organic products, and traditional high-quality foods and drinks, for example;
z zanimanjem ugotavlja, da osi 3 in 4 (LEADER) iz drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike (politika razvoja podeželja), ki predstavljata 15 % vseh izdatkov Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, zadevata nekmetijske dejavnosti, ki se osredotočajo predvsem na diverzifikacijo podeželskih gospodarstev; meni, da glede na naravo posegov, ki so financirani v okviru teh osi in so podobni nekaterim ukrepom, financiranim iz strukturnih skladov, obstaja nevarnost prekrivanja;
Notes with interest that Axis 3 and Axis 4 (LEADER) of the second pillar of CAP (rural development policy), which represent 15% of total EAFRD expenditure, concern non-agricultural activities that mainly focus on the diversification of rural economies; believes that, given the nature of the interventions financed under these Axes, which resemble some actions financed by the Structural Funds, there is a risk of policy overlap;
poudarja pa, da je treba upoštevati predvsem možnosti prebivalstva, zaposlenega v kmetijstvu, ki bi mu moralo biti pri podpornih ukrepih v sklopu politike razvoja podeželja posvečene največ pozornosti;
Stresses, however, the need to take account of the prospects primarily of the population employed in agriculture, who should remain the main focus of support measures under rural development policy;
poudarja, da je pomembno podpirati mlade kmete, da bi ostali na kmetiji, četudi se ne bi ukvarjali zgolj s kmetijsko proizvodnjo, in jim omogočiti razvojne spodbude in tudi druge dejavnosti, kot so kmečki turizem ter okrepitev malih in srednje velikih podjetij na podeželju;
Stresses the importance of support for young farmers to keep them on their land, even if they are not engaged solely in agricultural production, providing them with incentives for development and other activities too, such as rural tourism and of strengthening SMEs in the countryside;
meni, da se glavni cilji politike razvoja podeželja lahko dosežejo le z zagotovitvijo ustreznih sredstev, ki se bodo uporabljala v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami, in da bi bilo treba sredstva, zbrana prek modulacije, porazdeliti med dejavne kmetijske skupnosti;
Considers that the main objectives of rural development policy can only be achieved if this policy receives adequate funding that is used in line with the priorities set out for rural areas, and that funds raised through modulation should always be distributed back to active farming communities;
meni, da usklajevanje strukturne politike in ukrepov za razvoj podeželja omogoča projekte z večjo evropsko dodano vrednostjo; v tem vidi priložnost za trajno povečanje vrednosti podeželja, na primer z infrastrukturnimi ukrepi ali ukrepi za varovanje okolja;
Takes the view that the coordination of structural policy and rural development measures allows projects with greater European added value to be undertaken; sees in that an opportunity for long-term enhancement of rural areas, for example through infrastructural or environmental protection measures;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži natančne podatke in napovedi o uporabi sredstev iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja na podeželskih območjih in naj preuči možnosti sodelovanja med Evropskim kmetijskim skladom za razvoj podeželja in strukturnimi skladi v smislu financiranja, ki je na voljo na podeželskih območjih;
Calls on the Commission to supply detailed figures and forecasts for the take-up of EAFRD and structural funding in rural areas and to look into the synergies that can be created by the EAFRD and the Structural Funds in terms of the funding available in rural areas;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali bi programi regionalne politike lahko pripomogli k temu, da bi kmetom omogočili zanesljiv prihodek, na primer z izvajanjem dejavnosti za varovanje okolja in narave ter za ohranjanje kmetijstva;
Calls on the Commission to assess whether regional policy programmes can contribute to offering farmers a reliable income, for example through carrying out environmental protection, nature conservation and landscape management activities;
poudarja, da so med največjimi izzivi kohezijske politike trajnostni razvoj, višina prihodka na prebivalca, dostopnost, dostop do javnih dobrin in storitev ter zmanjševanje števila prebivalstva na podeželju in da je podpora gospodarskim dejavnostim v podeželskih regijah eden od najučinkovitejših načinov za uresničitev teh ciljev;
Stresses that sustainable development, per-capita income levels, accessibility, access to public goods and services and rural depopulation are among the biggest challenges for cohesion policy and can be most effectively improved through among other measures, support for economic activities in rural communities;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sistematično upoštevajo podeželje v vseh politikah EU in ustrezno podprejo projekte za razvoj človeškega kapitala, pri čemer naj zlasti zagotovijo možnosti za usposabljanje kmetijskih in nekmetijskih podjetnikov na podeželskih območjih ter posebno pozornost posvetijo mladim ženskam z namenom spodbuditi zaposlovanje in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take systematic account of the countryside in EU policies and to provide appropriate support for projects to develop human capital, in particular through the provision of training opportunities for agricultural and non agricultural entrepreneurs in rural areas, with a particular focus on young women, with the aim of promoting employment and job creation;
poudarja, da je treba pri razvoju podeželskih območjih več pozornosti in podpore posvetiti ohranjanju naravne in obdelovalne krajine, ekološkemu turizmu, proizvodnji in rabi obnovljivih virov energije ter lokalnim pobudam, kot so lokalni programi zagotavljanja kakovosti hrane in lokalne kmečke tržnice;
Emphasises that development in rural areas requires greater attention and support for the preservation of the natural and farmed landscape, ecotourism, the production and use of renewable energy and local initiatives such as local food-quality procurement schemes and local farmers' markets;
poudarja vlogo malih in srednje velikih podjetij v razvoju podeželja in njihov prispevek h konvergenci na regionalni in lokalni ravni; poziva Komisijo, države članice ter regionalne in lokalne organe, naj dajo poudarek na krepitev konkurenčnosti, tudi s pomočjo drugim proizvodnim sektorjem, in spodbujajo podjetniški duh na podeželskih območjih, zlasti z odpravo upravnih, pravnih in načrtovalnih ovir ter s povečanjem spodbud za začetek nove podjetniške dejavnosti, pa tudi z zagotavljanjem večje podpore nekmetijskim dejavnostim in s spodbujanjem gospodarske diverzifikacije na teh območjih;
Draws attention to the role played by SMEs in rural development and the contribution they make to convergence at regional and local levels; calls on the Commission, the Member States and regional and local authorities to lay the emphasis on strengthening competitiveness by also assisting other productive sectors and to foster entrepreneurship in rural areas, in particular by removing administrative, legal and planning barriers, providing adequate IT infrastructure and increasing the incentives to launch new entrepreneurial activities and also to offer more support to non-agricultural activities while promoting economic diversification in these areas;
ponovno opozarja Svet, Komisijo, države članice in lokalne organe, da je pričakovano izginotje več milijonov malih podjetij na podeželju zelo pomembno ter bo močno vplivalo na zaposlovanje, s tem pa tudi na stabilnost podeželja; poziva, da se na vseh ravneh vsi potrebni ukrepi sprejmejo v tesnem sodelovanju z gospodarskimi in socialnimi partnerji;
Once again draws the attention of the Council, the Commission, Member States and local authorities to the enormous challenge posed by the predicted disappearance of several millions of rural small businesses, which will have a major impact on employment and, therefore, on stability in the countryside; calls for all necessary measures to be taken at all levels, in close cooperation with economic and social partners;
priznava, da težave pri izvajanju politike razvoja podeželja obstajajo zaradi prepletanja med sektorskimi politikami in politiko teritorialne kohezije ter med njihovimi gospodarskimi in družbenimi razsežnostmi, zaradi številnih organizacijskih modelov porazdelitve pristojnosti in zaradi usklajevanja ukrepov na ravni držav članic; v tej zvezi ponovno poudarja potrebo po ustvarjanju sinergij med Evropskim kmetijskim skladom ter strukturnimi skladi in kohezijskim skladom in poziva Komisijo, naj nacionalnim, regionalnim in lokalnim organom pomaga pri razumevanju možnosti, ki jih nudijo ti finančni instrumenti; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo dialog med organi upravljanja, da bi ustvarili sinergije med ukrepi različnih skladov ter povečali njihovo učinkovitost;
Notes that the difficulties in implementing rural development policy stem from the fact that sectoral policies and territorial cohesion policy cut across each other, as do the economic and social aspects of both types of policy, and from the wide variety of responsibility allocation and policy coordination systems used in the Member States, in this connection, stresses once again the necessity to create synergies between the EAFRD and the Structural and Cohesion Funds and calls on the Commission to assist national, regional and local authorities in properly understanding the possibilities offered by these financial instruments; calls on Member States to ensure dialogue between managing authorities so as to create synergies between the interventions of the different funds and enhance their effectiveness;
meni, da je za reformo financiranja razvoja podeželja potrebno, da Komisija najprej pripravi poglobljeno oceno vseh sektorskih politik, ki vplivajo na podeželska območja, predvsem skupne kmetijske politike in regionalne politike, v okviru kohezijske politike in da se opredeli vrsta dobrih praks, ki izhajajo iz politike razvoja podeželja kot celote;
Takes the view that, prior to rural funding reform, the Commission should conduct a detailed assessment of all sectoral policies having an impact on rural areas, and notably CAP and regional policy, in the context of cohesion policy and that a set of best practices should be drawn up for rural development policy as a whole;
poziva Svet, naj skliče skupno neformalno srečanje ministrov za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja, na katerem bodo izmenjali mnenja o najboljših načinih za uskladitev kohezijske politike in ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, in naj povabi tudi posvetovalne organe EU (Odbor regij in Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor) ter predstavnike regionalnih in lokalnih organov;
Calls on the Council to convene a joint informal meeting of the Ministers responsible for agriculture and regional policy to discuss the best means of coordinating cohesion policy and rural development measures, and to invite to this meeting the consultative bodies of the EU (Committee of the Regions and European Economic and Social Committee), as well as representatives of regional and local authorities;
zahteva, da Komisija do leta 2011 oblikuje delovno skupino na visoki ravni kot del zdravstvenega pregleda skupne kmetijske politike, ki bo pripravila predloge za zaščito prihodnosti podeželskega gospodarstva in vsega podeželskega prebivalstva po letu 2013;
Requests that the Commission create a high-level working group by 2011 as part of the CAP Health Check which would bring forward proposals to secure the future of the rural economy and all who live in rural areas after 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi ali okrepi dejansko upravljanje in partnerstvo na vseh ravneh in pri tem neposredno vključi različne akterje, vključno z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji in mikro podjetji ter gospodarskimi in socialnimi partnerji, da bi skupaj opredelili prednostne akcijske ukrepe, ki bodo čim bolj prilagojeni potrebam razvoja podeželja;
Calls on the Commission to introduce or strengthen genuine governance or partnership arrangements at all levels, with the direct involvement of all players, including SMEs and microbusinesses, as well as the economic and social partners, with a view to defining the priorities for action best adapted to rural areas' development needs;
ugotavlja, da je treba proces razvoja podeželja povezati z interesi urbanih območij in ga dobro uskladiti s spodbujanjem razvoja urbanih območij, ter poudarja, da vzajemno delovanje med politiko razvoja podeželskih in urbanih območij ni niti zadostno niti učinkovito;
Notes that the process of rural development must be reconciled with the interests of suburban areas and must be closely coordinated with the promotion of urban development, and emphasises that the synergies between rural and urban development policies are neither sufficient nor effective;