natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker zaporedna poročila o dosežkih na področju notranjega trga kažejo, da kljub izboljšavam v nekaterih državah članicah, prenos in izvajanje še vedno predstavljata resno težavo,
whereas successive internal market scoreboard reports indicate that, despite improvements in some Member States, transposition and implementation of Community legislation continue to be a problem,
ker mora agenda za boljšo pravno ureditev dati prednost izvajanju in prenosu obstoječe zakonodaje, da bi se izognila neskladnostim, ki zmanjšujejo konkurenčnost Evrope, pravice delavcev in potrošnikov ter sposobnost potrošnikov in podjetij, da v celoti izkoristijo notranji trg,
whereas the better regulation agenda must prioritise the implementation and transposition of existing legislation in order to avoid discrepancies undermining Europe's competitiveness, employees" and consumers" rights and consumers" and businesses" ability to take full advantage of the internal market,
ker zaporedna poročila o dosežkih na področju notranjega trga kažejo, da prenos še vedno predstavlja resno težavo v več državah članicah,
whereas successive internal market scoreboard reports show that transposition continues to be a serious problem in several Member States,
ker so Parlament, Svet in Komisija ugotovili potrebo po uporabi alternativnih sredstev pravne ureditve v ustreznih primerih in v primerih, ko Pogodba ES uporabe zakonodajnega instrumenta ne zahteva posebej,
whereas Parliament, Council and the Commission have recognised the need to use alternative means of regulation in suitable cases and in cases where the EC Treaty does not specifically require the use of a legal instrument,
ker, v skladu z navedenim medinstitucionalnim sporazumom, takih sredstev pravne ureditve ni možno uporabljati, ko gre za temeljne pravice ali pomembna politična mnenja, ali v situacijah, ko je treba predpise enotno uporabljati v vseh državah članicah,
whereas under the above mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement, such means of regulation will not be applicable where fundamental rights or important political options are at stake or in situations where the rules must be applied in a uniform fashion in all Member States,
ker ne obstajajo uradni mehanizmi za obveščanje Parlamenta, preden se predlaga uporaba alternative zakonodaji, ali za posvetovanje s Parlamentom o rezultatih, ki jih bo prinesla alternativna zakonodaja; ker to pomanjkanje preverjanj in usklajenosti ogroža demokratično pristojnost Parlamenta,
whereas no formal mechanism exists to inform Parliament before it is proposed to use alternatives to legislation or to consult Parliament on the results that will be delivered by alternative regulation; whereas, this absence of checks and balances undermines the democratic prerogative of Parliament,
ker je pomembno, da vse tri institucije vlagajo sredstva in osebje v delovne skupine za oblikovanje "boljše pravne ureditve",
whereas it is vital that all three institutions invest resources and staff in establishing 'better regulation' task forces,
poudarja potrebo po tem, da Parlament, Svet in Komisija ustanovijo delovne skupine za "boljšo pravno ureditev", in da vzpostavijo medinstitucionalno delovno skupino za razvijanje usposabljanja, znanj in nadzora kakovosti, ter si izmenjajo in določijo najboljšo prakso za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Stresses the need for Parliament, Council and the Commission to establish 'better regulation' task forces, to set up an interinstitutional working group to develop training, skills and quality control and to share and benchmark better regulation best practice;
poziva Komisijo, da izdela kratek in jasen vodnik k boljšemu postopku urejanja, ki bo začrtal ključne korake, ki bi jih bilo treba narediti pri razvoju in izvajanju zakonodaje EU, vključno z vzpostavitvijo naknadnega ocenjevanja pomembnih področij, ki bi se izvajalo v sodelovanju s Parlamentom;
Urges the Commission to produce a short, clear guide to the better regulation process, outlining the key appraisal steps that should take place in the evolution, development and implementation of Community legislation including an ex-post evaluation on important issues, in cooperation with Parliament;
vztraja pri tem, da mora biti vsem predlogom Komisije priložen "kontrolni seznam boljše zakonodaje", ki povzema korake, skozi katere mora iti predlog, ter da je treba ta kontrolni seznam posodobiti po vsaki zaključeni stopnji, z napotitvijo na vse pomembne študije ali presoje vplivov;
Insists that all Commission proposals be accompanied by a "Better Regulation Check List" summarising the steps through which the proposal should proceed, and that this check list should be updated as each stage is completed, with cross-references to any relevant studies or impact assessments;
poudarja, da bosta strateški ureditveni pristop in trden okvir dosegla najboljše rezultate z usposobitvijo zadevnih sektorjev, da čim bolj učinkovito načrtujejo in izvajajo zakonodajo; pozdravlja pobudo Komisije CARS 21, ki je dober primer strateškega pristopa k ureditvi;
Emphasises the fact that a strategic regulatory approach and stable framework will produce optimal results by enabling the affected sectors to plan and implement legislation in the most effective way; commends the Commission for the CARS 21 initiative, which is a good example of a strategic approach to regulation;
meni, da je nujno, v interesu dosledne uporabe presoje vplivov Komisije, da je njihova kakovost podvržena zanesljivemu spremljanju urada, kar še zlasti velja za zakonodajo s področja notranjega trga;
Considers it essential, in the interests of the consistent use by the Commission of impact assessments, in particular in relation to internal market legislation, that their quality be monitored by a dedicated quality control function;
vztraja, da vsi Parlamentu posredovani zakonodajni predlogi vsebujejo povzetek presoje vplivov;
Insists that all legislative proposals forwarded to Parliament include an executive summary of the impact assessment;
vztraja, da mora Komisija še naprej utrjevati, poenostavljati in kodificirati;
Insists that the Commission must continue to consolidate, simplify and codify Community legislation so as to improve accessibility and legibility;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi nove predloge za bolj pregledno in učinkovito posvetovanje zainteresiranih strani; meni, da morajo biti socialni partnerji v to enakovredno vključeni in da se je treba posvetovati z organizacijami potrošnikov in z okoljskimi organizacijami;
Requests that the Commission come forward with new proposals for more transparent and effective stakeholder consultation; takes the view that the social partners must be involved in this on an equal footing and that consumer and environmental organisations must be consulted;
vztraja, da Komisija vzpostavi pregleden in hiter postopek za primere preverjanja kršitev na notranjem trgu in da obvesti Parlament o tem, kako so v praksi prednostna merila za obravnavanje kršitev pregledana in predstavljena pritožnikom, kakor je bilo navedeno v sporočilu o boljšem spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti;
Insists that the Commission establish a transparent fast-track infringement procedure for internal market test cases and that it inform Parliament on how its priority criteria for infringement handling, as announced in its above mentioned communication on better monitoring of the application of Community law, are in practice screened and brought to the attention of complainants;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da izboljšata spremljanje izvajanja in skladnosti s pravom Skupnosti; meni, da bo to pripomoglo k izboljšanju stopnje prenosa in izmenjave najboljših praks med državami članicami, kakor tudi pri uvedbi sankcij v primeru kršitev; vztraja, da poročilo Komisije o izvajanju ne sme biti omejeno na pravno analizo izvedbenih instrumentov, temveč mora tudi oceniti uporabo zadevne zakonodaje v praksi;
Urges the Council and the Commission to improve monitoring of the implementation of and compliance with Community law; is of the opinion that this is likely to assist in improving transposition rates and the sharing of best practice between the Member States, as well as in introducing sanctions for non-compliance; insists that the Commission's reports on implementation must not be confined to a legal analysis of the implementing instruments but must also evaluate the application of the legislation in question in practice;
vztraja, da se Parlamentu zagotovi seznam ukrepov politike, v katerih je Komisija uporabila alternativna sredstva pravne ureditve, ki vključuje oceno neuspeha ali uspeha takih sredstev, njihovih učinkov na situacijo v praksi – natančneje na pravice delavcev in potrošnikov, socialno kohezijo, pošteno konkurenco, spodbujanje rasti in konkurenčnega položaja EU ter na najboljše prakse in izkušnje, pridobljene v postopku; vztraja, da se te informacije vključi v letno poročilo Komisije o boljši pripravi zakonodaje;
Insists that Parliament be provided with a list of policy measures in which the Commission has used alternative means of regulation that includes an evaluation of the failure or success of such means of regulation, their impact on the situation in practice – and more specifically on employees" and consumers" rights, social cohesion, fair competition, the stimulation of growth and the EU's competitive position – and on best practice, and lessons learned from the process; insists that this information be incorporated in the Commission annual report on better law-making;
priznava, da klasičen način urejanja ni vedno primeren način za doseganje cilja politike;
Recognises that the classic method of regulation is not always the appropriate way to achieve a policy objective;
vztraja na osrednji vlogi Parlamenta, zlasti odgovornega poročevalca, pri spremljanju izvajanja in skladnosti s pravom Skupnosti ter nadzora Komisije na tem področju;
Insists on the central role of Parliament, and particularly of the rapporteur responsible, in monitoring Member States" implementation of and compliance with Community law and the supervision thereof by the Commission;
se zaveda možnosti, ki jih Lamfalussyjev proces nudi za doseganje enotnega trga finančnih storitev, vendar obžaluje počasen napredek pri doseganju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, v katerem bi bila v polni meri priznana vloga Parlamenta v procesu izvajanja;
Recognizes the potential of the Lamfalussy process to achieve a single market in financial services, but regrets the slow progress in reaching an interinstitutional agreement which fully recognises the Parliament's role in the implementation process;
vztraja, da Komisija letnemu delovnemu programu priloži seznam tistih predlogov, ki bi lahko bili predmet alternativne ureditve;
Insists that, in the Annual Work Programme, the Commission provide a list of those proposals which may be the subject of alternative regulation;
vztraja, da alternativni predlogi pravne ureditve vključujejo tako jasne cilje in določene skrajne roke za ukrepanje, kakor tudi sankcije za kršitve;
Insists that alternative regulatory proposals include clear objectives and defined deadlines for action, as well as sanctions for non-compliance;
predlaga, da odbori Parlamenta vzpostavijo trdne mehanizme za ocenjevanje in spremljanje izvajanja in uporabe alternativnih sredstev pravne ureditve z namenom zagotoviti pravna sredstva potrošnikom, ko ponudniki ne izpolnjujejo svojih obveznosti, v skladu s takimi alternativnimi predlogi pravne ureditve;
Proposes that Parliament's committees set up robust review mechanisms to evaluate and monitor the implementation and use of alternative means of regulation with a view to ensuring legal redress for consumers where operators fail to meet their commitments under such alternative regulatory proposals;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja ( 2006/2006(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment ( 2006/2006(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2000 o poročilu Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom "Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje 1998: Skupna odgovornost" in "Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje 1999" UL C 197, 12.7.2001, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 1998 – A shared responsibility" and "Better lawmaking 1999" OJ C 197, 12.7.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o Beli knjigi Komisije o evropskem upravljanju UL C 153 E, 27.6.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the Commission White Paper on European governance OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovoma "Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje 2000" in "Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje 2001" UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 8 April 2003 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 2000" and "Better lawmaking 2001" OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. februarja 2004 o poročilu Komisije z naslovom "Boljše sprejemanje zakonodaje 2002" UL C 98 E, 23.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 February 2004 on the Commission report entitled "Better Lawmaking 2002" OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju regulativnih dejavnosti Skupnosti UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2004 on the Commission communication on simplifying and improving the Community's regulatory activity OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o oceni vpliva zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopkov posvetovanja UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on assessment of the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedures OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ustavne zadeve, Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov( A6-0080/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0080/2006 ),
ker sta poenostavljanje zakonodajnega okolja ter garancija jasnosti, učinkovitosti in kakovosti zakonodaje, sedanje in bodoče, bistvena pogoja za uresničitev cilja "boljšega sprejemanja zakonodaje", kar je prednostna naloga Evropske unije v okviru splošnega cilja povečanja rasti in zaposlovanja,
whereas simplifying the legislative environment and ensuring the clarity, efficacy and quality of both existing and future legislation are essential prerequisites for attaining the objective of "better lawmaking", which constitutes a priority for the Union in the context of boosting growth and employment,
ob upoštevanju obveznosti in ciljev, določenih v Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje z dne 16. decembra 2003 UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
having regard to the obligations and aims laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making of 16 December 2003 OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
, predvsem obveznosti in ciljev v zvezi s poenostavitvijo in zmanjšanjem obsega zakonodaje Skupnosti ter vplivom te zakonodaje v državah članicah,
, especially those intended to simplify, and reduce the volume of, Community legislation and those relating to the impact of Community legislation in the Member States,
ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 25. oktobra 2005 z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2005)0535 ) poenostavitve z vso pravico ne predstavlja kot zakonodajno tehniko, ki se razlikuje od kodifikacije, preoblikovanja ali razveljavitve, temveč kakor celovit postopek, ki vključuje omenjena orodja in je namenjen poenostavitvi in s tem pocenitvi nacionalnih predpisov in predpisov Skupnosti,
whereas the Commission, in its communication of 25 October 2005 entitled "Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2005)0535 ), rightly presents simplification not as a distinct legislative technique involving codification, recasting or straightforward repeal but as an overall approach including those tools and aimed at making Community and national legislation easier to apply and hence less costly,
ker ta pristop Komisiji, Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu predstavlja orodje v službi doseganja ciljev Lizbonske strategije,
whereas this approach, is for the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament, a tool for use in achieving the aims of the Lisbon strategy,
ker takšen postopek predvideva tesno partnerstvo na tem področju, najprej med evropskimi institucijami in potem med njimi in pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi,
whereas such an approach requires a close partnership in this area, first between the European institutions and then between the latter and the national authorities,
ob upoštevanju v zadnjih letih opravljenih prizadevanj Komisije, Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta za izvajanje, opredelitev in izboljšanje uporabe instrumentov za poenostavitev zakonodaje,
having regard to the unstinting efforts by the Commission, the Council and Parliament in recent years to bring about, define and improve the application of legislative simplification tools,
ker so bile pobude za poenostavitev, sprožene od začetka izvajanja drugega programa poenostavitve februarja 2003, po sporočilu Komisije "Izvajanje in poenostavitev pravnega reda Skupnosti" ( KOM(2003)0071 z dne 11. februarja 2003), po svoji naravi in obsegu zelo različne in so zajemale vse od pregleda posamičnih direktiv do natančnega pregleda celotnega sektorja, kar otežuje poenotenje postopkovnega pristopa,
whereas the simplification initiatives undertaken since the second simplification programme was launched in February 2003 following the Communication from the Commission to the Council entitled "Updating and simplifying the Community acquis" ( COM(2003)0071 , 11 February 2003) have varied widely in nature and scope, ranging from the review of specific directives to overhauling the legislation of an entire sector, thus hampering a standardised procedural approach,
ob upoštevanju pridobljenih izkušenj pri uveljavljanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 20. decembra 1994 UL C 102, 4.4.1996, str.
having regard to the experience acquired in the implementation of the Interinstitutional Agreements of 20 December 1994 OJ C 102, 4.4.1996, p.
o kodifikaciji in z dne 28. novembra 2001 UL C 77, 28.3.2002, str.
on codification and of 28 November 2001 OJ C 77, 28.3.2002, p.
o preoblikovanju ter ob upoštevanju teh instrumentov kakor bistvenih za poenostavitev pravnega reda Skupnosti,
on recasting, and considering those instruments to be essential in order to simplify the acquis communautaire,
ker je bilo od začetka veljavnosti Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju predstavljenih le dvanajst predlogov za preoblikovanje, od katerih sta se dva zaključila z objavo, dva sta bila umaknjena in osem jih je še vedno v obravnavi; ker je bilo Evropskemu parlamentu predstavljenih le 49 predlogov za kodifikacijo od 2 400 družin zakonodajnih aktov, za katere bi se lahko uporabil postopek,
whereas since the Interinstitutional Agreement on recasting entered into force, only 12 recasting proposals have been submitted, of which 2 led ultimately to publication of the resulting acts, 2 have been withdrawn, and 8 are still pending; and whereas, compared to somewhere in the region of 2 400 families of legislative acts to which the procedure might be applicable, only 49 codification proposals have to date been submitted to Parliament,
ker zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije iz leta 2005 v svojem tekočem programu poenostavitve (Priloga 2) vsebuje trideset predlogov, ki jih ni lahko opredeliti, ker gre na splošno za primere "ponovnega pregleda", "revizije", "posodobitve", "poenostavitve" in podobno,
whereas the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 2005 contains, in its "Simplification Rolling Programme" (Annex 2), thirty proposals which cannot easily be classified, dealing generically with cases for "review", "revision", "modernisation", "simplification" and the like,
izrecno podpira tako postopek poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja Unije, kakor tudi cilj, da se zagotovi, da je zakonodajno okolje ustrezno, enostavno in učinkovito; poudarja pa, da je potrebno takšen postopek utemeljiti na nekaterih predpogojih:
Strongly supports the process of simplification of the Union's regulatory environment, as well as the objective of ensuring that the regulatory environment is appropriate, simple and effective; stresses, however, that such a process must be based on a number of preconditions:
polna udeležba Evropskega parlamenta tako v medinstitucionalnem pogovoru o poenostavitvi kakor tudi kot sozakonodajalec pri sprejemanju zakonodaje, ki je predmet "postopka poenostavitve";
full involvement of the European Parliament both in the interinstitutional debate on simplification and, as co-legislator, in the adoption of the legislation subject to the "simplification process";
obširno in pregledno posvetovanje med vsemi pomembnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, kar vključuje tako države članice kakor tudi gospodarske družbe in nevladne organizacije;
wide and transparent consultation of all relevant stakeholders, thus including not only Member States and business but also non-governmental organisations;
povečanje splošne preglednosti zakonodajnega postopka predvsem tako, da se seje Sveta odprejo za javnost, ko Svet deluje v svoji zakonodajni vlogi;
strengthening of the general transparency of the regulatory process, in particular by opening Council discussions to the public when the Council is acting in its legislative capacity;
podpira zakonodajo, ki temelji na načelih, vendar meni, da predlogi Komisije niso ustrezni; poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje sprejme natančno usmerjeno in pretehtano zakonodajo, katere posledice so predvidljive, ki naj prispeva k vzpostavitvi ugodnih pogojev za dvig rasti in zaposlovanja, z zmanjšanjem stroškov in odpravljanjem nepotrebnih upravnih stroškov, z odpravljanjem ovir za prilagajanje in inovativnostjo in s splošnim zagotavljanjem pravne varnosti;
Encourages the Commission to adopt, under the aegis of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, specifically targeted and well thought-out legislation the effects of which can be foreseen, and which will help to establish favourable conditions for boosting growth and employment by reducing unnecessary administrative costs and procedures, eliminating obstacles to adaptability and innovation and generally ensuring legal certainty;
pozdravlja zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije iz leta 2005, zavezo glede predstavitve programa za poenostavitev zakonodajnih aktov ter opredeljene načine in cilje, s katerimi namerava uresničiti ta program;
Welcomes the above-mentioned Commission communication of 2005, the commitment to submitting a programme to simplify legislative acts, and the methods and targets laid down for translating that programme into reality;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija namerava sprejeti pomembne pobude za poenostavitev svojih letnih zakonodajnih programov in tudi namero, da bo predstavila dopolnilna sporočila za različne sektorje gospodarstva Skupnosti; poudarja pomen tesnega sodelovanja med državami članicami in Komisijo, da bi tako določili zakonodajo, ki bi morala postati predmet poenostavitve;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission intends to include major simplification initiatives in its annual legislative programmes and the announcement that the Commission will submit additional communications to cover the different sectors of the Community economy; stresses the importance of close collaboration between the Member States and the Commission for the purpose of identifying the legislation which should be simplified;