natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja potrebo po podpiranju odpiranja novih in razvoja mladih, inovativnih malih in srednjih podjetij, med drugim z ustreznimi davčnimi spodbudami;
Underlines the need to foster the development of start-ups and young, innovative SMEs, inter alia through the use of appropriate tax incentives;
poudarja potrebo po manj obremenjujočih, hitrejših postopkih odobritve; v zvezi s tem podpira skupinske izjeme za pomoč v manjšem obsegu, namenjeno malim in srednjim podjetjem;
Stresses the need for faster and less burdensome approval procedures; favours in this context block exemptions for small-scale aid to SMEs;
Storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
Services of General Economic Interest
poziva Komisijo, da končno zagotovi pravno jasnost glede pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena;
Calls on the Commission finally to ensure legal clarity as regards aid for services of general economic interest;
meni, da je element prekomernih kompenzacij najpomembnejše merilo, zato predstavlja financiranje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena državno pomoč samo v primerih, ko merilo ustrezne izravnave ni izpolnjeno in ni dokaza o njegovi izpolnitvi;
Considers that the element of overcompensation is the most fundamental criterion and that, therefore, the financing of services of general economic interest constitutes State aid only in those cases in which the criterion of justifiable compensation is not and cannot be shown to be fulfilled;
obžaluje, da še vedno obstajajo velike razlike, kako si bo Komisija v praksi razlagala preskus iz sodbe Sodišča v primeru Altmark; poziva Komisijo, da izda jasno in natančno razlago četrtega merila iz sodbe v primeru Altmark,
Regrets that there are still great differences between how the Commission intends to interpret the test in the Court of Justice's Altmark judgment in practice; calls on the Commission to issue a clear and precise interpretative communication on the fourth criterion set out in the Altmark judgment,
ob upoštevanju vedno večjega pomena javno-zasebnih partnerstev za gradnjo infrastrukture v slabše razvitih regijah poziva Komisijo, naj podeljevanju državne pomoči tovrstnim partnerstvom posveti posebno pozornost ter poskrbi za pravno svetovanje o vseh vprašanjih v zvezi z uporabo pravil o državni pomoči na tem področju, še zlasti pa z ustreznimi pravili poenostavi uporaba javno-zasebnih partnerstev; predlaga, da bi bilo treba s tem v zvezi zlasti poskrbeti, da se zagotovi ohranjanje transparentnosti;
Asks the Commission, given the increasing importance of public-private partnerships for building infrastructures in less developed regions, to pay particular attention to the issue of State aid provision for such partnerships and, thereby, to provide legal guidance on all issues regarding the applicability of State aid rules in this context and calls, in particular, for appropriate rules to simplify the use of public-private partnerships; submits that special care should be taken in this connection to ensure that transparency is maintained;
ugotavlja, da so manjša podjetja za javne storitve izvzeta iz uporabe pravil o državni pomoči; ter se sprašuje, ali je razlikovanje med majhnimi in velikimi podjetji pri presoji pravil o državni pomoči ustrezno; zato se zavzema, da bi presoja Komisije temeljila na učinkih državne pomoči na zadevnem trgu, ne pa na velikosti podjetja za javne storitve;
Notes the exemption of smaller public service companies from the application of the State aid rules; wonders, however, whether the distinction between smaller and larger undertakings in the assessment of State aid rules is adequate; pleads, therefore, for the Commission's assessment to be based on the effects of State aid measures on the relevant market rather than on the size of the public service company involved;
podpira sprejetje uredbe Komisije o splošnih skupinskih izjemah, ki bo poenostavila in združila obstoječe skupinske izjeme, zlasti glede usposabljanja, malih in srednjih podjetij ter zaposlovanja in vključila nove, zlasti kar zadeva državno pomoč za mala in srednja podjetja ter raziskave in razvoj, v kolikor je navzkrižno subvencioniranje od malih do velikih podjetij ustrezno nadzorovano in po potrebi prepovedano; podpira Komisijo, ki se namerava spopasti predvsem z oblikami pomoči, ki najbolj izkrivljajo konkurenco; meni, da bi morali biti priglasitveni postopki in z njimi povezani zaostanki sorazmerni s tveganjem, da bo zadevna pomoč povzročila resno izkrivljanje konkurence; meni, da bi lahko z enim samim zakonskim instrumentom omogočili prihodnje razširitve koncepta skupinskih izjem, tako da manjših zneskov posameznih vrst pomoči ne bi bilo treba priglasiti;
Supports the adoption of a general block exemption regulation by the Commission in order to simplify and consolidate the existing block exemptions, notably on training, SMEs and employment, and to integrate a broader range of exemptions, notably as regards State aid to support SMEs and R&D, so long as cross-subsidisation from small to large enterprises is monitored and prohibited as appropriate; agrees with the Commission's aim of focusing its resources on tackling the most distortional aids; considers that the notification procedures and delays inherent therein should be proportionate to the risk of distortion of competition arising from the grant of aid in question; opines that a single legal instrument could also facilitate future extensions of the block exemption concept, such that smaller amounts of each type of aid need no longer be notified;
poudarja, da bi morala splošna uredba o skupinskih izjemah resnično poenostaviti postopek, in sicer z jasnimi, podrobnimi in nedvoumnimi določbami, ki ne bodo ogrozile glavnega cilja, namreč splošnega zmanjšanja državne pomoči;
Stresses the need to ensure that a general block exemption regulation leads to a true simplification of the procedure, with clear, detailed and unambiguous provisions, which do not compromise the overriding aim of a general reduction in State aid;
pozdravlja predlog za zvišanje praga
Welcomes the proposal to raise the
; predlaga podvojitev zneska na 200 000 EUR; v zvezi s tem prosi Komisijo, naj se posveti nadzoru kumulacije različnih pomoči;
threshold; suggests that the figure be doubled, to EUR 200 000; asks the Commission in this context to address the problem of cumulation control;
Regionalna pomoč
Regional aid
pozdravlja smernice Komisije o nacionalni regionalni pomoči za obdobje 2007-2013 Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
Welcomes the Commission's Guidelines on National Regional Aid for 2007-2013 Not yet published in OJ.
; poudarja, da bi morala politika regionalne pomoči nameniti večjo pozornost ozemeljskim merilom, da bi se geografska področja EU z močnim gospodarstvom razlikovala od področij, ki se srečujejo s težavami pri prehodu v industrijsko družbo in od področij s trajnimi, naravnimi ovirami; meni, da se kohezijska politika in politike državne pomoči dopolnjujejo: politike državne pomoči so dokazano učinkovit instrument za doseganje resnične konvergence dohodkov po vsej EU;
; stresses that regional aid policy should give greater consideration to territorial criteria so as to distinguish geographical areas of the EU with a strong economy from areas experiencing industrial conversion difficulties and areas with permanent natural handicaps; views cohesion and State aid policies as complementary because State aid policies have proved to be an effective instrument on the road towards the genuine convergence of incomes across the EU;
meni, da bi morala biti državna pomoč dovoljena le, če dodaja vrednost, ki je ne more noben drug politični ukrep in koristi regiji; zato podpira učinkovitejši način dodeljevanja regionalne pomoči s poudarkom na naložbah v infrastrukturo ter na horizontalni pomoči za najmanj razvite regije EU, vključno z uvedbo davčnih olajšav za prehodno obdobje največ petih let; v zvezi s tem opozarja na potrebo po ohranjanju ustreznih podpornih ukrepov za regije, prizadete zaradi "statističnega učinka";
Considers that State aid should be permitted only where the aid both adds value that no other political measure can achieve and is for the benefit of a region; therefore, supports a more efficient approach to the grant of regional aid, with a focus on investments in infrastructure and horizontal aid in disadvantaged or the least developed regions of the EU, including the introduction of advantageous tax conditions for transitional periods not exceeding five years; in this connection, highlights the need to maintain appropriate support measures for "statistical effect" regions;
meni, da bi morali pregledati zmanjšanja državne pomoči za regije s "statističnim učinkom", katerih dohodek se je zaradi širitve sicer relativno povečal, dejansko pa niso dosegle rasti ali zbliževanja ter so obremenjene z visoko stopnjo nezaposlenosti;
Considers that there should be a review of the reductions in State aid to the "statistical effect" regions, which have benefited from a relative increase in income as a result of enlargement but which have not achieved real growth or convergence and which suffer a high unemployment rate;
poziva Komisijo, da ob upoštevanju na ciljev EU in njene kohezijske politike, katere namen je gospodarsko in socialno zbliževanje na podlagi ukrepov za odpravljanje neravnovesij med regijami EU, da zagotovi, da niti nacionalna niti evropska državna pomoč ne izkrivlja konkurence med regijami držav članic in ne financira selitev podjetij znotraj EU, ki se odraža zlasti v izgubi delovnih mest ene regije na račun druge regije;
Calls on the Commission, in view of the EU's objectives as well as its cohesion policy, which is designed to achieve economic and social convergence through measures aimed at redressing imbalances between the EU's regions, to ensure that neither national nor European State aid results in a distortion of competition between Member States" regions and does not finance intra-EU relocation, leading, in particular, to jobs being lost in one region for the benefit of another;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj skladno z lizbonsko in göteborško strategijo bolj poglobljeno in natančneje oceni različne vrste državnih pomoči in njihovo učinkovitost ter tako ugotovi, ali so katere od njih koristnejše za regionalni razvoj kakor druge z vidika njihovega morebitnega trajnega in pozitivnega učinka;
Encourages the Commission, in line with the Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies, to assess in greater depth and detail the different types of State aid and their effectiveness so that it can indicate whether certain forms of aid are more advantageous than others as regards any lasting, positive impact they may have on regional development;
poziva Komisijo, da načela, ki jih je zapisala v akcijskem načrtu državnih pomoči, uporablja tudi pri posebnih pravilih, ki veljajo za določene sektorje, na primer kmetijstvo, ribištvo ter proizvodnjo in prevoz premoga, ki so ponavadi koncentrirani na območjih, upravičenih do sredstev iz strukturnih skladov, ter poda nadaljnje predloge za spreminjanje teh posebnih pravil;
Asks the Commission to apply the principles outlined in the SAAP also to the specific rules applicable to certain sectors, such as agriculture, fisheries, coal production and transport, which are often concentrated in areas eligible for structural funds, and to make more suggestions focused on reforming these specific rules;
meni, da ima lahko pošteno in razvidno uporabljena državna pomoč za varstvo okolja ključno vlogo pri doseganju trajnostnega razvoja v EU, zlasti z dolgoročnim spodbujanjem naložb v tehnologijo in njenim patentiranjem v EU v skladu s ciljem ustalitve emisij toplogrednih plinov, določenim v Okvirni konvenciji ZN o klimatskih spremembah;
Considers that environmental State aid, where fair and transparent in its application, can play a crucial role in achieving the goal of sustainable development in the EU, particularly by stimulating investment in technology over the long term and by the patenting of such technology in the EU, in line with the objective of stabilising greenhouse gas emissions laid down in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change;
potrjuje stališče Komisije, da trenutne smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja "niso primerno prilagojene vse bolj izpopolnjenim naložbam v okoljske tehnologije in novim oblikam javno-zasebnih partnerstev" Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom: "Spodbujanje tehnologij za trajnostni razvoj: Akcijski načrt okoljskih tehnologij za Evropsko unijo" z dne 28. januarja 2004 ( KOM(2004)0038 , v odstavku 4.2.3).
Endorses the Commission's view that the current guidelines on State aid for environmental protection are "not properly adapted to the increasing sophistication of investments in environmental technologies, nor to new forms of public/private partnership" Commission Communication, "Stimulating Technologies for Sustainable Development: An Environmental Technologies Action Plan for the European Union" of 28 January 2004 ( COM(2004)0038 , at paragraph 4.2.3).
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da pospešijo uvajanje ukrepov za zmanjšanje okolju škodljive državne pomoči ter da jo naposled v celoti ukinejo; ugotavlja, da je višina te državne pomoči znatna; in poziva Evropsko agencijo za okolje, da pripravi seznam subvencij, ki neposredno ali posredno spodbujajo onesnažujočo proizvodnjo in porabo, kar povzroča nelojalno konkurenco čistejšim tehnologijam;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to speed up the introduction of measures to reduce environmentally damaging State aid and ultimately to eliminate it altogether; notes that the size of this State aid is considerable; and calls on the European Environment Agency to draw up a list of subsidies which directly or indirectly promote polluting production and consumption, thereby creating unfair competition for cleaner technologies;
zato pozdravlja začetek postopka z interesnimi skupinami, da bi se ponovno pregledale te smernice, ki veljajo do konca leta 2007;
Welcomes, therefore, the start of the stakeholder process with a view to revising these guidelines, which are set to expire by the end of 2007;
meni, da so trenutna praksa in postopki na področju politike državne pomoči pomanjkljivi in preveč birokratski;
Considers that the current practices and procedures of State aid policy have certain shortcomings and are too bureaucratic;
zato pozdravlja uvedbo smernic za najboljšo prakso pri podeljevanju državne pomoči, da bodo priglasitveni postopki potekali hitreje in učinkoviteje, vendar se ob tem sprašuje, ali ne bi tega cilja hitreje dosegli z uredbo kakor s smernicami;
Welcomes, therefore, the introduction of best practice guidelines on State aid procedures for speedier and more efficient notification procedures; questions, in this context, whether a regulation would not be more appropriate than guidelines to achieve this aim;
odločno podpira zamisel o vzpostavitvi tesnejše mreže nadzornih organov, kakor so na primer računska sodišča v državah članicah, s čimer bi zagotovili večjo doslednost pri izvajanju pravil za državno pomoč;
Strongly supports the idea of forming a closer network of supervisory authorities, such as courts of auditors, in the Member States, which could facilitate the objective of consistency in the application of the State aid rules;
poziva Komisijo, naj jasno določi roke za postopke državne pomoči, vključno s postopki v zvezi s skladnostjo;
Urges the Commission to set clear time limits for State aid proceedings, including compliance;
izraža nezadovoljstvo, da se trenutno kazni za nepriglasitev izrekajo samo upravičencem pomoči, državam članicam pa ne; zato podpira Komisijo pri raziskovanju novih mehanizmov za preprečevanje, ki bi obravnavali nepravilno izvajanje pravil za državno pomoč držav članic, in poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za ustrezne sankcije v zvezi s tem;
Expresses its discontent that sanctions for non-notification are currently enforced only against beneficiaries and not against Member States; supports the Commission, therefore, in exploring new deterrent mechanisms with a view to addressing the incorrect implementation of the State aid rules by Member States, and invites the Commission to provide for appropriate sanctions in this regard;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o posledicah globalizacije za notranji trg ( 2004/2225(INI) )
European Paliament resolution on the effects of globalisation on the internal market ( 2004/2225(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A6-0021/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on International Trade ( A6-0021/2006 ),
ker globalizacijo, ki jo nekateri opredeljujejo kakor "povečano globalno dostopnost virov dobrin, storitev, dela in kapitala, ki ji oporo zagotavlja informacijska revolucija", pogosto razumemo kakor enega od temeljnih izzivov za tradicionalne evropske družbene, kulturne modele in modele odločanja kakor tudi gospodarske modele, pa tudi za njen gospodarski sistem, zlasti notranji trg EU,
whereas globalisation, defined as "the increased global sourcing of goods, services, labour and capital flows, strengthened by the information revolution", has been perceived as posing fundamental challenges to traditional European social, cultural, decision-making and economic models as well as its economic system, and in particular to the EU internal market,
ker sta razvoj notranjega trga EU in svetovne ekonomije tesno prepletena in ker globalizacija, zahvaljujoč se tehnološkemu razvoju in odstranitvi političnih in tehničnih ovir trgovini, pospešuje mednarodno trgovino z dobrinami in storitvami,
whereas the development of the EU internal market and of the world economy is closely interlinked, and whereas, thanks to technological progress and the removal of political and technical barriers to trade, globalisation facilitates international commerce in goods and services,
ker statistični podatki kažejo, vmesna ocena lizbonskega procesa pa potrjuje, da se je v zadnjih letih EU kot celota soočala z izzivi, povezanimi z ohranitvijo vodilnega položaja na ključnih področjih, kakor so gospodarska rast, delovanje trga delovne sile, raziskave in inovacije (Sporočilo spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu: Sodelovanje za rast in delovna mesta - nov začetek za lizbonsko strategijo ( KOM(2005)0024 ) in Sporočilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu: Skupni ukrepi za rast in zaposlovanje: Lizbonski program Skupnosti ( KOM(2005)0330 )),
whereas statistical data suggest that, over the past years, the EU has been facing challenges concerning the retention of its leading position in key areas such as economic growth, labour market performance, research and innovation, as stated in the midterm review of the Lisbon process (Communication to the Spring European Council: Working together for growth and jobs - A new start for the Lisbon Strategy ( COM(2005)0024 ) and Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Common Actions for Growth and Employment: The Community Lisbon Programme ( COM(2005)0330 )),
ker je cilj lizbonske strategije, kakor potrjuje vmesna ocena, izgradnja konkurenčne Evrope v globalnem okolju; ker je osrednji cilj lizbonske strategije izgradnja najbolj dinamičnega in konkurenčnega, na znanju temelječega gospodarstva na svetu do leta 2010, z več in boljšimi delovnimi mesti, višjimi okoljskimi cilji in večjo socialno kohezijo,
whereas the aim of the Lisbon Strategy, as confirmed in the midterm review, is to build a competitive Europe in a global environment; whereas the Lisbon Strategy has set as its central goal the construction by 2010 of the world's most dynamic and competitive knowledge-based economy, with more and better jobs, higher environmental aims and enhanced social cohesion,
ker globalizacije ne bi smeli imeti le za negativni dejavnik, ki vodi k družbeni razdrobljenosti, temveč prej kot okvir, ki po eni strani priskrbi nove priložnosti v obliki dostopa do svetovnega trga, po drugi strani pa tudi obstaja nevarnost, da bo povzročila odvisnost EU od razvoja svetovne trgovine, kar je razlog zato, da politično vodstvo podpre pozitivne (in odstrani negativne) vplive na notranji trg,
whereas globalisation should not be considered exclusively as a negative factor leading to social fragmentation, but rather as a framework, on the one hand providing new opportunities in the form of access to the worldwide market, but also, on the other, posing the threat of EU dependency on the development of worldwide trade, which is why political management should support positive and eliminate negative influences on the internal market,
ker hiter in večstranski razvoj liberalizacije trgovine s tretjimi državami, kjer veljajo nizki delovni in okoljski standardi, predstavlja pomemben izziv konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva in zahteva veliko prilagoditev evropskih ekonomskih in socialnih modelov,
whereas the rapid multilateral liberalisation of trade with third countries with low labour and environmental standards poses a considerable challenge to the competitiveness of the European economy and requires huge adjustments to the European economic and social models,
ker bi se morala EU, da bi lahko izkoristila globalizacijo, (i) prilagoditi svetovnim gospodarskim spremembam; (ii) napredovati na gospodarsko močnih področjih, kakor je sektor srednje-visoke tehnologije; (iii) odpraviti pomanjkljivosti, na primer v sektorju visoke tehnologije, vključno s informacijsko in komunikacijsko tehnologijo in biotehnologije; ter (iv) razviti nova področja s primerjalno prednostjo,
whereas in order to realise potential gains from globalisation, the EU must (i) adapt to global economic changes, (ii) advance in areas of economic strength, such as the medium-high technology sector, (iii) address its weaknesses, as in the high-technology sector, including information and communication technology and bio-technology, and (iv) develop new areas of comparative advantage,
ker uresničitev na znanju temelječega gospodarstva ni možna brez ustrezne strategije in dobrega financiranja,
whereas the realisation of the knowledge-based economy is not possible without proper strategy and sound financing,
ker bi morala EU, ki se bo od 15 kmalu povečala na (verjetno) 27 in več držav članic, da bo njen odgovor na izzive globalizacije temeljil na izkušnjah, ki izhajajo iz postavitve enotnega trga, določiti strategijo soočanja s temi izzivi ter v ta namen povečati prilagodljivost in globalno usmeritev notranjega trga, hkrati pa omogočiti rast, delovna mesta in socialno pravičnost ter ekološko ravnovesje, ob ohranjanju naših vrednot in socialnega modela,
whereas the EU, growing from what was recently 15, to 27 or more Member States in the near future, must define a strategy of how to face these challenges by making the internal market more flexible and globally oriented, while, at the same time, finding ways to deliver growth, jobs, social justice and respect for ecological balance and maintaining the EU's values and social model, in order to respond to the challenges of globalisation on the basis of the EU's experience in building the single market,
ker bi morala taka strategija vsebovati poziv k jasni politični zavezanosti k dokončni vzpostavitvi notranjega trga kakor največje naložbe, ki bo EU v največji možni meri omogočila izkoriščanje prednosti globalizacije; ker je treba pri prizadevanjih za reforme, katerih cilj je zmanjšati regulatorne obremenitve, upoštevati navedbe vmesnega pregleda lizbonske strategije, kakor določata zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije in sporočilo o bolje oblikovanih predpisih ( KOM(2005)0097 ),
whereas such a strategy must include a call for clear political commitment for the completion of the internal market as the EU's strongest asset to maximise the advantages of globalisation; whereas reform efforts aimed at reducing regulatory burdens must take into account the indications of the midterm review of the Lisbon Strategy, as outlined in the above mentioned Commission Communications and in the Communication on Better Regulation ( COM(2005)0097 ),