natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju izjave varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov z dne 27. decembra 2011 o bombnih napadih v Nigeriji,
– having regard to the statement by the UN Security Council on attacks in Nigeria on 27 December 2011,
– ob upoštevanju drugič spremenjenega sporazuma iz Cotonouja 2007–2013, ki ga je Nigerija ratificirala 27. septembra 2010,
– having regard to the second revision of the Cotonou Agreement 2007-2013, ratified by Nigeria on 27 September 2010,
– ob upoštevanju poglavja IV nigerijske ustave o temeljnih pravicah 38 (1): Vsakdo ima pravico do svobode misli, vesti in veroizpovedi, tudi pravico do spremembe veroizpovedi ali prepričanja, ter pravico do izražanja veroizpovedi ali prepričanja z bogoslužjem, poučevanjem, prakticiranjem in obredi (kot posameznik ali v skupnosti z drugimi, javno ali zasebno).
– having regard to Chapter IV of the Nigerian Constitution on fundamental rights, 38 (1): Every person shall be entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, including freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom (either alone or in community with others, and in publlic or in private) to manifest and propagate his religion of belief in worship, teaching, practice and observance.
A. ker so pravica do veroizpovedi, prepričanja, vesti ter misli temeljne in univerzalne vrednote ter temelji demokracije; ker je Evropska unija večkrat izrazila zavezanost pravici veroizpovedi, prepričanja, vesti in misli ter poudarila, da so vlade te pravice dolžne zagotavljati po vsem svetu;
A. whereas the freedoms of religion, belief, conscience and thought are fundamental and universal values and are essential elements of democracy; whereas the European Union has repeatedly expressed its commitment to the freedoms of religion, belief, conscience and thought, and has stressed that governments have a duty to guarantee these freedoms all over the world;
B. ker je 20. januarja 2012 v severnem mestu Kano življenje izgubilo 185 civilistov in pripadnikov policijskih sil; ker je ekstremistična islamska skupina Boko Haram na božični dan 2011 izvedla vrsto bombnih napadov na cerkve, v katerih je v cerkvi v Madali življenje izgubilo 40 ljudi;
B. whereas on 20 January in the Northern city of Kano, 185 civilians and police were killed; whereas on Christmas day, 2011 Boko Haram, an extremist Islamic Group, carried out a string of church bombings which killed 40 people at a church in Madalla;
C. ker je bilo leta 2012 izvedenih 21 smrtonosnih napadov, od leta 2009 pa je življenje izgubilo več kot 935 ljudi;
C. whereas since the beginning of 2012, 21 deadly attacks took place; whereas more then 935 people have been killed since 2009;
D. ker je skupina Boko Haram prevzela odgovornost za bombne napade na cerkve, policijske postaje, vojaške objekte, banke in poslopje Združenih narodov v Abuji;
D. whereas the Boko Haram group has claimed responsibility for bombing churches, police stations, military facilities, banks as well as the United Nations building in Abuja;
E. ker je predsednik Jonathan Goodluck v odzivu na nenehne smrtonosne napade na severu države 31. decembra 2011 na nekaterih območjih razglasil stanje izrednih razmer;
E. whereas in response to continuing deadly attacks in Northern Nigeria, President Goodluck Jonathan on 31 December 2011 declared a state of emergency in some areas;
F. ker po nigerijskem zveznem kazenskem zakoniku za homoseksualno vedenje predpisana zaporna kazen do 14 let, medtem ko je v nekaterih državah, ki izvajajo šeriatsko pravo, za sporazumno homoseksualno vedenje moških predpisana smrtna kazen, za ženske pa bičanje in šestmesečna zaporna kazen; ker je bila nedavno sprejeta tudi zvezna zakonodaja, ki inkriminira istospolne poroke; ker je nacionalna skupščina tovrstno zakonodajo pred tem poskusila sprejeti že dvakrat, vendar so ji to preprečili mednarodni in nacionalni borci za človekove pravice;
F. whereas according to Nigeria’s federal criminal code homosexual conduct carries a sentence of up to 14 years in prison, whereas in certain states which implement Sharia law, consensual male homosexual conduct is punishable by death while in the case of women, flogging and 6 month prison sentences; whereas federal legislation was also recently introduced which criminalizes same-sex marriages; whereas the National Assembly attempted on two occasions to introduce such legislation but was prevented from doing so by international and domestic human rights activists;
G. ker se lahko verski zakoni uporabljajo le za tiste, ki jih sprejmejo;
G. whereas religious laws can only be applied to those who accept them;
H. ker so težave v Nigeriji posledica pomanjkanja gospodarskega razvoja, napetosti pa izhajajo iz desetletij sovraštva med domorodnimi skupinami, ki s priseljenci in kolonisti s havško govorečega muslimanskega severa tekmujejo za nadzor nad rodovitnimi kmetijskimi zemljišči;
H. whereas the problems in Nigeria stem from a lack of economic development and the tension is rooted in decades of resentment between indigenous groups, vying for control of fertile farmlands with migrants and settlers from the Hausa-speaking Muslim north;
I. ker večina 148-milijonskega prebivalstva Nigerije živi pod pragom revščine, čeprav je ta država osma največja svetovna proizvajalka nafte;
I. whereas although Nigeria is the world’s eighth-largest oil producer the majority of its 148 million inhabitants live below the poverty line;
J. ker so državljani januarja tega leta po vsej državi izvedli stavko zaradi nafte, ker so oblasti odpravile naftne subvencije ter s tem povečale napetosti v nigerijski družbi;
J. whereas last January a nationwide fuel strike by civilians followed after an abolition of oil subsidies by the authorities enhancing the tension in the Nigerian society;
K. ker je za mirno rešitev sporov potreben pravičen dostop do virov in prerazporeditev prihodkov v Nigeriji, ki je bogata z nafto;
K. whereas the peaceful resolution of conflicts also implies fair access to resources and the redistribution of revenues in an oil-rich country such as Nigeria;
L. ker je EU v skladu s členom 8 spremenjenega sporazuma iz Cotonouja v rednem političnem dialogu z Nigerijo o človekovih pravicah in demokratičnih načelih, tudi o etnični, verski in rasni diskriminaciji;
L. whereas, under Article 8 of the revised Cotonou Agreement, the EU engages in regular political dialogue with Nigeria on human rights and democratic principles, including ethnic, religious and racial discrimination;
M. ker je dialog med verami in drugače mislečimi bistven za spodbujanje miru, strpnosti in medsebojnega razumevanja med narodi po vsem svetu;
M. whereas interreligious and inter-convictional dialogue is crucial to promote peace, tolerance and mutual understanding between peoples in the world;
1. odločno obsoja nasilje v Nigeriji ter izraža zaskrbljenost spričo sedanjih etničnih, verskih in političnih napetosti, zaradi katerih še naprej trpi na tisoče ljudi;
Strongly condemns the violence in Nigeria and expresses its concern about the ongoing ethnic, religious and political tensions as a result of which thousands of people continue to suffer;
11. visoko predstavnico evropske službe za zunanje delovanje tudi poziva, naj v Nigeriji sprejme ukrepe ter pri tem združi diplomacijo in dolgoročno razvojno sodelovanje, da bi dosegli mir, varnost, dobro upravljanje in spoštovanje človekovih pravic;
Calls upon the High Representative of the European External Action Service to undertake measures in Nigeria, combining diplomacy with long-term development cooperation in order to achieve peace, security, good governance and respect for human rights;
9.3.2012 B7-0150/2012 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0106/2012
9.3.2012 B7-0150/2012 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0106/2012
o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
on judicial training ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
PE483.202v01-00 B7‑0150/2012 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
PE483.202v01-00 B7‑0150/2012 European Parliament resolution on judicial training ( 2012/2575(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki predvidevata sprejetje ukrepov v „pomoč pri usposabljanju sodnikov in zaposlenih na sodišču“ z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom,
– having regard to Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which provide for the adoption under the ordinary legislative procedure of measures aimed at ensuring ‘support for the training of the judiciary and judicial staff’,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. septembra 1991 o ustanovitvi evropske pravne akademije UL C 267, 14.10.1991, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 10 September 1991 on the establishment of a European Law Academy OJ C 267, 14.10.1991, p.
, svojega stališča z dne 24. septembra 2002 o sprejetju sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
, its position of 24 September 2002 on the adoption of a Council decision setting up a European judicial training network OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
, svoje resolucije z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
, its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
in svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 7. maja 2009 o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0386 .
, and its recommendation of 7 May 2009 to the Council on development of an EU criminal justice area Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0386 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o akcijskem načrtu za izvajanje stockholmskega programa COM(2010)0171 .
– having regard to the Commission communication on an Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme’ COM(2010)0171 final.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 o stockholmskem programu P7_TA-PROV(2009)0090 .
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the Stockholm Programme P7_TA‑PROV(2009)0090.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. junija 2010 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov P7_TA(2010)0242 .
– having regard to its resolution of 17 June 2010 on judicial training P7_TA(2010)0242 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. septembra 2011 z naslovom „Vzpostavljanje zaupanja v pravosodni sistem celotne EU – nova razsežnost evropskega izobraževanja v pravosodju“ COM(2011)0551 .
– having regard to the Commission communication of 13 September 2011 entitled ‘Building trust in EU‑wide justice – a new dimension to European judicial training’ COM(2011)0551 final.
– ob upoštevanju pilotnega projekta za izobraževanje pravosodnih organov, ki ga je Parlament predlagal leta 2011,
– having regard to the pilot project on judicial training proposed by Parliament in 2011,
– ob upoštevanju primerjalne študije o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov v državah članicah, ki jo je Parlament naročil pri ERA v sodelovanju z EJTN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/delegations/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=60091
– having regard to the comparative study on judicial training in the Member States commissioned by Parliament from ERA in collaboration with the EJTN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/d e legations/en/studiesdownload.html?languageDocument=EN&file=60091
A. ker omenjena študija preučuje dejavnosti, ki jih na tem področju izvajajo nacionalne pravosodne izobraževalne ustanove, vključno z vrsto usposabljanja, pogoji in proračunskimi viri, njen namen pa je poleg tega opredeliti potrebe in predlagati izboljšave in praktične zglede ter predstaviti rezultate poglobljene ankete med več kot 6.000 sodniki in tožilci v državah članicah, s poudarkom na njihovih izkušnjah z izobraževanjem o pravu EU in njihovih predlogih za izboljšave;
A. whereas the above-mentioned study took stock of the activities carried out in this field by national schools for the judiciary, including the type of training offered, relevant conditions, and budgetary resources, with a view also to identifying needs and suggestions for improvement and best practices, and contains the results of an in-depth survey of over 6 000 judges and prosecutors in the Member States focusing on their experience of EU law training and their suggestions for improvement;
B. ker bi morali pravosodnemu usposabljanju pravzaprav reči „pravosodne študije“, da se poudari posebna narava nepretrganega intelektualnega razvoja, ki je potreben v pravosodju, in dejstvo, da so prav sodniki najbolj poklicani za izvajanje pravosodnega usposabljanja;
B. whereas judicial training should properly be called ‘judicial studies’ to reflect the special nature of the continuing intellectual development that members of the judiciary have to undergo and the fact that the best people to provide judicial studies are judges themselves;
C. ker trenutna ponudba izobraževanja še zdaleč ne izpolnjuje ciljev Komisije, namreč da bi morala biti na voljo polovici pravnih strokovnjakov v EU;
C. whereas the supply of training is currently far from meeting the Commission’s target, namely that it should be available to half of EU legal professionals;
D. ker so glede na ugotovitve iz študije jezikovne ovire, pomanjkanje (pravočasnih) informacij o obstoječih programih, dejstvo, da programi niso vedno prilagojeni potrebam sodnikov, velike delovne obremenitve sodnikov in nezadostno financiranje med glavnimi razlogi za razmeroma majhno število tistih, ki se izobražujejo o pravu EU (53 %, od tega samo tretjina v zadnjih treh letih);
D. whereas according to the study language barriers, a lack of (timely) information on existing programmes, the fact that programmes are not always adapted to judges’ needs, together with judges’ heavy workloads and the lack of relevant funding are among the reasons for the relatively low level of respondents receiving training in EU law (53 %, and only one third of them within the last 3 years);
E. ker je v trenutnih razmerah finančne varčnosti tudi s proračunskega vidika priporočljivo, da se izkoristijo obstoječe ustanove, zlasti nacionalne šole za pravosodno izobraževanje, pa tudi univerze in strokovni organi, kar zadeva vidike nacionalne zakonodaje pri vzpostavljanju evropske pravosodne kulture; ker bo na ta način mogoče opredeliti najboljše prakse v državah članicah, jih gojiti in širiti po celotni EU; ker bi morala pri izobraževanju o pravu EU svojo vlogo še naprej igrati Evropska pravna akademija (ERA);
E. whereas it is wise, including from the budgetary point of view in the present situation of financial stringency, to take advantage of existing institutions, particularly national judicial training schools, but also universities and professional bodies, as far as the ‘national law’ aspects of building a European judicial culture are concerned; whereas, by this means, best practices can be identified in the Member States and fostered and disseminated across the EU; whereas as far as training in EU law is concerned, the Academy of European Law (ERA) should continue to play its role;
F. ker je Parlament že opozoril, da mora evropsko pravosodno območje graditi na skupni pravosodni kulturi izvajalcev, sodnikov in tožilcev, ki pa ne sme izhajati samo iz prava EU, temveč jo je treba razviti s skupnim poznavanjem in razumevanjem nacionalnih pravosodnih sistemov, temeljito prenovitvijo univerzitetnih učnih programov, izmenjavami, študijskimi obiski in skupnim usposabljanjem z dejavno podporo Evropske pravne akademije, evropske mreže za sodniško usposabljanje in Evropskega pravnega inštituta;
F. whereas, as Parliament has already pointed out, the European judicial area must be built on a shared judicial culture among practitioners, the judiciary and prosecutors which is not only based on EU law but developed through mutual knowledge and understanding of the national judicial systems, a root-and-branch revamping of university curricula, exchanges, study visits and common training with the active support of the Academy of European Law, the European Judicial Training Network and the European Law Institute;
G. ker bi moralo biti izobraževanje pravosodnih organov povezano z razpravo o tradicionalni vlogi pravosodja in njegovi modernizaciji, o tem, kako ga odpreti in razširiti njegova obzorja; ker to zahteva tudi jezikovno izobraževanje ter spodbujanje študija primerjalnega in mednarodnega prava;
G. whereas judicial training should be linked to a debate on the traditional role of the judiciary and its modernisation, how to open it up and broaden its horizons; whereas this also entails language training and promoting the study of comparative law and international law;
H. ker je treba med delavci v pravosodju gojiti skupno sodno kulturo na podlagi listine o temeljnih pravicah, dela beneške komisije Sveta Evrope in podobno, da se okrepijo osrednje vrednote pravosodnega poklica z razpravo in širjenjem enotne poklicne etike, pravna država in načela za imenovanje in izbor sodnikov in da se prepreči politizacija pravosodja, s tem pa spodbudi vzajemno zaupanje, potrebno za uresničenje skupnega pravosodnega območja;
H. whereas a common judicial culture also needs to be created among members of the judiciary using the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the work of the Council of Europe’s Venice Commission and so on to promote the core values of the judicial profession by discussing and promulgating common professional ethics, the rule of law and the principles for the appointment and selection of judges, and to avoid the politicisation of the judiciary, thereby promoting the mutual trust necessary to make the common judicial area a reality;
I. ker je treba ustvariti nove mreže sodnikov iz različnih kultur in izboljšati usklajevanje v obstoječih mrežah, da bodo lahko nastali „krogi usklajenosti“; ker elektronska komunikacija za to ne zadostuje, ampak so potrebni forumi, kjer bodo lahko sodniki vzpostavljali medsebojne stike, pritegniti pa je treba tudi sodnike z luksemburškega in strasbourškega sodišča;
I. whereas it is necessary to create networks between judges of different cultures and improve coordination of the existing networks in order to create ‘circles of coherence’; whereas, for this, electronic communication is not enough, and there must be fora in which judges can make contact and it is essential to involve judges from the Luxembourg and Strasbourg Courts;
J. ker pravosodne študije ne smejo biti omejene na materialno in postopkovno pravo in ker se morajo sodniki usposabljati tudi o sodnem delu in veščinah;
J. whereas judicial studies cannot be limited to substantive and procedural law, and whereas judges need training related to their judicial business and in ‘judgecraft’;
4. meni, da bi lahko težave (stroški, jezikovno izobraževanje, stroškovna učinkovitost) rešili z uporabo sodobnih tehnologij in financiranjem razvoja programov v smislu Applove knjižnice iTunes U; takšni programi, ki bi jih pripravljale nacionalne šole, ERA, univerze in druge izobraževalne ustanove, bi vsebovali tečaje z videogradivom, vključno z jezikovnim usposabljanjem (s posebnim poudarkom na pravni terminologiji), in napotke glede nacionalnih pravnih sistemov, zlasti pravnih postopkov in podobno, bili pa bi brezplačni za delavce v pravosodju;
Takes the view that one way of resolving the problems (costs, language training, cost-effectiveness) is to utilise modern technology and finance the creation of applications (‘apps’) on the lines of Apple’s ITunes U; such ‘apps’, prepared by the national schools, ERA, universities and other trainers, would consist of training courses, with video material, including language training (with particular emphasis on legal terminology) and instruction about national legal systems, particular legal procedures, etc. and would be free of charge to members of the judiciary;
8. meni, da bi bilo treba v pilotnem projektu ustanoviti delovno skupino ponudnikov pravosodnega usposabljanja na nacionalni in evropski ravni, pa tudi izvensodnih akterjev, katere cilj bi bil opredeliti niz tem v okviru prava EU, ki so najpomembnejše za vsakodnevno sodno prakso, tako pri praktičnih (kako vložiti zahtevo za predhodno odločanje, kako dostopati do podatkovnih zbirk prava EU itd.) kot pri vsebinskih vprašanjih;
Takes the view that the pilot project should encompass the creation of a working group comprising national and European judicial training providers as well as extra-judicial actors, whose aim would be to identify a series of thematic ‘clusters’ of EU law issues, which seem to be the most relevant for everyday judicial practice, both on ‘practical’ matters (how to submit a request for preliminary ruling, how to access EU law databases, etc.), and on matters of substance;
9.3.2012 B7-0151/2012 PREDLOG SKLEPA v skladu s členom 184 Poslovnika
9.3.2012 B7-0151/2012 PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION pursuant to Rule 184 of the Rules of Procedure
o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za organiziran kriminal, korupcijo in pranje denarja, njegovih pristojnostih, številčni sestavi in mandatu
on setting up a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, its powers, numerical composition and term of office
PE483.203v01-00 B7‑0151/2012 Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za organiziran kriminal, korupcijo in pranje denarja, njegovih pristojnostih, številčni sestavi in mandatu
PE483.203v01-00 B7‑0151/2012 European Parliament decision on setting up a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, its powers, composition and term of office
– ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z dne ... glede predloga o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora za organiziran kriminal, korupcijo in pranje denarja ter opredelitvi njegovih pristojnostih, številčni sestavi in mandatu,
– having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of ... to propose that a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering be set up and its powers and numerical composition defined,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2011 o organiziranem kriminalu v Evropski uniji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0459 .
– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2011 on organised crime in the European Union Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0459 .
, v kateri je izrazil svojo namero o ustanovitvi posebnega odbora,
, whereby it expressed its intention to set up a special committee,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. septembra 2011 o prizadevanjih EU za boj proti korupciji Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0388 .
– having regard to its resolution of 15 September 2011 on the EU’s efforts to combat corruption Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0388 .
– ob upoštevanju člena 184 Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 184 of its Rules of Procedure,
(a) analizirati in oceniti razširjenost organiziranega kriminala, korupcije in pranja denarja ter njihovega vpliva na Unijo in njene države članice ter predlagati primerne ukrepe, da bo Unija lahko preprečila te grožnje in jim kljubovala tako na mednarodni, evropski kot nacionalni ravni;
(a) to analyse and evaluate the extent of organised crime, corruption and money laundering and its impact on the Union and its Member States and to propose appropriate measures to enable the Union to forestall and counter these threats, including at international, European and national level;