natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je treba čim bolj poenostaviti poročanje o gibanju ovac in koz ter posredovanje informacij do podatkovnih baz in pristojnih organov, hkrati pa dovoliti uporabo vseh komunikacijskih sredstev komunikacije, vključno z novimi tehnologijami;
Believes that reporting on the movement of sheep and goats and the forwarding of information to databases and the authorities should be simplified as much as possible, with all communication tools being permitted, including new technologies;
meni, da pri ovcah in kozah podobno kot pri prašičih zadošča označevanje čred;
Considers that for sheep and goats, as for pigs, herd identification is sufficient;
poziva k odlogu obveznosti elektronske identifikacije ovac in koz, ki je začela veljati 31. decembra 2009, ker so njeni stroški v času gospodarske krize prekomerni;
Calls for deferment of the obligation on the electronic identification of sheep and goats starting from 31 December 2009, given its excessive cost in a time of economic crisis;
poziva k triletni amnestiji kazni za kršitev navzkrižne skladnosti v zvezi z elektronsko identifikacijo ovac in koz, ker gre za novo in zapleteno tehnologijo in bodo kmetje potrebovali nekaj časa, da se nanjo privadijo in jo preizkusijo; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj opravi temeljit pregled uredbe;
Calls for an amnesty of three years on cross-compliance penalties relating to electronic identification of sheep and goats, given that this is a new and complex technology and will require some time for farmers to become accustomed to and road-test; further, calls on the Commission to conduct a thorough review of the regulation;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. maja 2010 o novostih na področju javnih naročil ( 2009/2175(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 18 May 2010 on new developments in public procurement ( 2009/2175(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti s posebnim poudarkom na spremembah, ki jih je uvedla Lizbonska pogodba,
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, with particular reference to the changes introduced by the Lisbon Treaty,
ob upoštevanju direktiv 2004/18/ES in 2004/17/ES o javnih naročilih ter Direktive 2007/66/ES o pravnih sredstvih pri javnih naročilih,
having regard to Directives 2004/18/EC and 2004/17/EC on procedures for the award of public contracts and Directive 2007/66/EC on review procedures concerning the award of public contracts,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. novembra 2009 „Aktiviranje zasebnih in javnih naložb za oživitev gospodarstva in dolgoročne strukturne spremembe: razvijanje javno-zasebnih partnerstev“ ( KOM(2009)0615 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 19 November 2009 entitled ‘Mobilising private and public investment for recovery and long term structural change: developing Public Private Partnerships’ ( COM(2009)0615 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. maja 2009 „Prispevek k trajnostnemu razvoju: vloga pravične trgovine in nevladnih sistemov zagotavljanja trajnosti, povezanih s trgovino“ ( KOM(2009)0215 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 5 May 2009 entitled ‘Contributing to Sustainable Development: The role of Fair Trade and non-governmental trade-related sustainability assurance schemes’ ( COM(2009)0215 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. julija 2008 „Javna naročila za boljše okolje“ ( KOM(2008)0400 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 16 July 2008 entitled ‘Public procurement for a better environment’ ( COM(2008)0400 ),
ob upoštevanju razlagalnega sporočila Komisije z dne 5. februarja 2008 „o uporabi zakonodaje Skupnosti v zvezi z javnimi naročili in koncesijami za institucionalizirana javno-zasebna partnerstva“ (C(2007)6661),
having regard to the Commission interpretative communication of 5 February 2008 on the application of Community law on Public Procurement and Concessions to Institutionalised Public-Private Partnerships (IPPP) (C(2007)6661),
ob upoštevanju navodil dobrega ravnanja za boljši dostop malih in srednjih podjetij do javnih naročil (delovni dokument služb Komisije ( SEC(2008)2193 )),
having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘European Code of Best Practices Facilitating Access by SMEs to Public Procurement Contracts’ ( SEC(2008)2193 ),
ob upoštevanju razlagalnega sporočila Komisije z dne 1. avgusta 2006 o zakonodaji Skupnosti, ki velja za oddajo javnih naročil, ki niso zajeta ali so samo delno zajeta v direktivah o javnih naročilih UL C 179, 1.8.2006, str.
having regard to the Commission interpretative communication of 1 August 2006 on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the Public Procurement Directives OJ C 179, 1.8.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju naslednjih sodb Sodišča:
having regard to the following judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU):
z dne 18. decembra 2007, C-532/03,
of 18 December 2007 in Case C-532/03
Irish rescue services,
(Irish rescue services),
z dne 9. junija 2009, C-480/06,
of 9 June 2009 in Case C-480/06
Stadtwerke Hamburg,
(Stadtwerke Hamburg),
z dne 15. oktobra 2009, C-275/08,
of 15 October 2009 in Case C-275/08
Datenzentrale Baden-Württemberg,
(Datenzentrale Baden-Württemberg),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 10. februarja 2010 „Prispevanje k trajnostnemu razvoju: vloga pravične trgovine in nevladnih sistemov zagotavljanja trajnosti, povezanih s trgovino“ (RELEX-IV-026),
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 10 February 2010 on ‘Contributing to Sustainable Development: The role of Fair Trade and non-governmental trade-related sustainability assurance schemes’ (RELEX-IV-026),
ob upoštevanju naslednjih študij:
having regard to the following studies:
„Evaluation of Public Procurement Directives: Markt/2004/10/D Final Report“, Europe Economics, 15. september 2006,
‘Evaluation of Public Procurement Directives: Markt/2004/10/D Final Report’, Europe Economics, 15 September 2006,
„The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments: A Case Study of the 1999/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives“, European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), september 2009,
‘The Institutional Impacts of EU Legislation on Local and Regional Governments: A Case Study of the 1999/31/EC Landfill Waste and 2004/18/EC Public Procurement Directives’, European Institute of Public Administration (EIPA), September 2009,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. februarja 2009 o predkomercialnih naročilih: spodbujanje inovacij za zagotavljanje visokokakovostnih trajnostnih javnih storitev v Evropi UL C 67 E, 18.3.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 3 February 2009 on pre-commercial procurement: driving innovation to secure sustainable high-quality public services in Europe OJ C 67 E, 18.3.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. junija 2007 o specifičnih težavah pri prenosu in izvajanju zakonodaje o javnih naročilih in odnosu do Lizbonske agende UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 June 2007 on specific problems in the transposition and implementation of public procurement legislation and its relation to the Lisbon Agenda OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2006 o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih in zakonodaji Skupnosti na področju javnih naročil in koncesij UL C 313 E, 20.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on public-private partnerships and Community law on public procurement and concessions OJ C 313 E, 20.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2006 o pravični trgovini in razvoju Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0320 .
having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2006 on Fair Trade and development Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0320 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0151/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0151/2010 ),
ker se je v gospodarski in finančni krizi pokazalo, kako velik gospodarski pomen imajo javna naročila, ker so vplivi krize na lokalne oblasti že jasno vidni in ker lahko državni organi svoje naloge dobro izpolnijo v korist vseh samo, če imajo ustrezno pravno varnost in postopki niso preveč zapleteni,
whereas the economic and financial market crisis has highlighted the vital economic importance of public procurement, whereas the effects of the crisis on local authorities are already clearly evident, and whereas at the same time public authorities can perform their tasks properly in the public interest only if they can count on the requisite legal certainty in this area and if procurement procedures are not too complex,
ker je dobro delujoč trg javnih naročil bistvenega pomena za notranji trg zaradi spodbujanja čezmejne konkurence, inovacij in nizkoogljičnega gospodarstva ter doseganja optimalne vrednosti za javne organe,
whereas a well-functioning procurement market is essential for the internal market, in order to encourage cross-border competition, stimulate innovation, promote a low-carbon economy and achieve optimal value for public authorities,
ker je namen zakonodaje o javnih naročilih zagotavljati, da se javna sredstva pametno in učinkovito upravljajo, in nuditi zainteresiranim družbam priložnost, da dobijo naročila v okviru pravične konkurence,
whereas public procurement law serves to ensure that public funds are managed soundly and efficiently and to give interested companies the opportunity to be awarded public contracts in a context of fair competition,
ker je bil namen revizije direktiv o javnih naročilih iz leta 2004 doseči poenostavitev, posodobitev in večjo prožnost ter pravno varnost,
whereas the 2004 revision of the public procurement directives was intended to simplify and modernise the relevant procedures, make them more flexible and establish greater legal certainty,
ker je bila z Lizbonsko pogodbo v primarni zakonodaji Evropske unije prvič priznana pravica do samouprave regionalnih in lokalnih organov, bilo je okrepljeno načelo subsidiarnosti, pravica do vlaganja tožb na Sodišče EU pa je bila uvedena tako za nacionalne parlamente kot Odbor regij,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty has incorporated into European Union primary law the first acknowledgement of the right to regional and local self-government, consolidated the concept of subsidiarity and granted both the national parliaments and the Committee of the Regions the right to bring actions before the CJEU,
ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti obravnavalo nesorazmerno število primerov kršitev na tem področju, kar kaže, da imajo številne države članice težave pri izpolnjevanju direktiv o javnih naročilih,
whereas the European Court of Justice has examined a disproportionate number of infringement cases in this area, indicating that many Member States have struggled to comply with the public procurement directives,
ker Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije vključuje pojem socialnega tržnega gospodarstva, socialno klavzulo in protokol o storitvah splošnega pomena, ki opredeljuje vrednote, skupne vsej Uniji, da bi zagotovila, da se evropska politika razvija tako, da izpolnjuje hotenja evropskih državljanov,
whereas, with a view to ensuring that European policies develop in such a way as to meet the aspirations of Europe's citizens, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union incorporates the notion of a social market economy, a social clause and a protocol on services of general interest defining the shared values of the Union,
ker konvencija 94 Mednarodne organizacije dela določa, da morajo splošna javna naročila vsebovati klavzule, ki zagotavljajo pravično plačilo in delovne pogoje, ki niso slabši od tistih, ki so dogovorjeni denimo v kolektivnih pogodbah,
whereas ILO Convention 94 stipulates that general public contracts shall contain clauses ensuring equitable remuneration, and labour conditions which are not less favourable than those laid down in collective agreements, for example,
obžaluje, da doslej še niso bili izpolnjeni cilji, predvideni z revizijo direktiv o javnih naročilih iz leta 2004, zlasti glede poenostavitve pravil javnega naročanja in vzpostavitve pravne varnosti; vendar upa, da bodo nedavne sodbe Sodišča pomagale rešiti odprta pravna vprašanja in da se bo število pritožbenih postopkov zmanjšalo; poziva Komisijo, naj pri vsakem pregledu evropskih predpisov upošteva in si dejavno prizadeva doseči cilje poenostavljanja in racionalizacije postopka javnih naročil;
Deplores the fact that the aims of the 2004 revision of the public procurement directives have not yet been achieved, particularly with regard to the simplification of procurement rules and the creation of more legal certainty; expresses the hope, however, that the most recent judgments handed down by the CJEU will help to resolve the outstanding legal issues and that the number of appeal procedures will fall; calls on the Commission to have regard to, and actively to pursue, the aims of simplifying and streamlining the public procurement procedure in any review of the European rules;
poleg tega obžaluje, da so veljavni predpisi, skupaj z nepopolnim prenosom ukrepov na nacionalni in regionalni ravni in mnogih pobud mehkega prava Evropske komisije ter razlag evropskega in nacionalnih sodišč, privedli do zapletenega in nepreglednega sklopa predpisov, zaradi katerega se predvsem državni organi, zasebna podjetja in ponudniki storitev splošnega pomena soočajo s hudimi pravnimi težavami, ki jih brez večjih upravnih stroškov ali zunanjega pravnega svetovanja ne morejo več rešiti; poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za rešitev tega stanja in v okviru pobude za boljšo pripravo zakonodaje preuči posledice predlogov mehkega prava, take predloge omeji na ključne vidike in jih oceni glede na načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter ob upoštevanju petih načel, navedenih v beli knjigi o evropski upravi iz leta 2001 (odprtost, udeležba, odgovornost, učinkovitost in skladnost);
Further deplores the fact that the existing regulations – in combination with incomplete implementation measures at national and regional level, the plethora of soft law proposals put forward by the Commission, and the interpretation of the relevant legal provisions by European and national courts – have given rise to a complicated and confusing set of rules which is creating, in particular for public bodies, private undertakings and providers of services of general interest, serious legal problems that can no longer be overcome without incurring substantial administrative costs or seeking external legal advice; urges the Commission to remedy this situation and, as part of the ‘Better Lawmaking’ initiative, to examine the impact of soft law proposals, to restrict such proposals to key aspects and to assess them in the light of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, taking into account the five principles set out in the 2001 White Paper on European Governance (openness, participation, accountability, effectiveness and coherence);
opozarja, da mora zaradi tega razvoja javni naročnik pogosto pred političnimi potrebami prednostno upoštevati pravno varnost, zaradi pritiska na javne proračune pa mora naročilo ali storitev pogosto oddati najcenejšemu namesto ekonomsko najugodnejšemu ponudniku; se boji, da bo to ošibilo inovacijsko osnovo in globalno konkurenčnost EU; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša to stanje in oblikuje strateške ukrepe za spodbujanje javnih naročnikov k oddajanju naročil ponudnikom z najgospodarnejšo in najkvalitetnejšo ponudbo;
Points out that as a result of this development public procurers often have to prioritise legal certainty above policy needs and, given the pressure on public budgets, frequently have to award the contract or service in question to the cheapest offer rather than the most economically advantageous tender; is afraid that this will weaken the EU's innovative base and global competitiveness; urges the Commission to remedy this situation and to develop strategic measures to encourage and empower public procurers to award contracts to the most economical, highest-quality offers;
poudarja, da je potrebno učinkovitejše usklajevanje evropskih pobud na področju javnih naročil, da ne bi ogrozili skladnosti z direktivami o javnih naročilih in povzročili pravnih težav za uporabnike; zato zahteva obvezno usklajevanje znotraj Komisije pod vodstvom generalnega direktorata za notranji trg in storitve, ki je zadolžen za javna naročila, in ob sodelovanju drugih ustreznih generalnih direktoratov; zahteva enotno prisotnost naročnikov na spletu in redno obveščanje za boljšo preglednost ustrezne zakonodaje in njeno večjo prijaznost do uporabnika;
Emphasises that European initiatives in the area of public procurement must be coordinated more effectively in order to avoid jeopardising consistency with the public procurement directives or creating legal problems for those applying the rules; calls, therefore, for compulsory coordination measures within the Commission, under the lead of the Internal Market and Services Directorate-General, which is in charge of public procurement, and with the participation of the other relevant Directorates-General; calls for a uniform internet presence and regular information for the contracting authorities, with a view to making the relevant legal provisions more transparent and user-friendly;
kritizira pomanjkljivo preglednost glede sestave in delovnih rezultatov notranje svetovalne skupine za javna naročila pri Komisiji in vloge in pristojnosti svetovalnega odbora za odpiranje javnih naročil ter poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za uravnoteženo sestavo, ki naj vključuje tudi sindikate in predstavnike poslovnega sveta, zlasti MSP, in večjo preglednost pri tem organu, kakor tudi pri načrtovanem odboru za javno-zasebna partnerstva; zahteva, da je Evropski parlament ustrezno obveščen in da v vsaki fazi ter na koncu postopka dobi vse razpoložljive informacije;
Criticises the lack of transparency with regard to the composition and work of the Commission's internal advisory committee on public procurement (ACPP) and the role and competencies of the Advisory Committee on the Opening-Up of Public Procurement (CCO), and calls on the Commission to take steps to ensure that the composition of both this committee and the planned new advisory committee on public-private partnerships is balanced, including trade unionists and representatives of the business community, in particular SMEs, and that they work in a transparent manner; demands that the European Parliament be kept properly informed and receive all the available information at every stage and at the end of the process;
meni, da bi morala biti javna naročila pregledna in odprta za javni nadzor, saj zadevajo javna sredstva; prosi Komisijo za pojasnilo, da se zagotovi pravna varnost lokalnim in drugim javnim organom in da lahko ti svoje državljane obvestijo o svojih pogodbenih obveznostih;
Takes the view that, since public contracts concern public funds, they should be transparent and open to public scrutiny; asks the Commission for clarification with a view to ensuring legal certainty for local and other public authorities and enabling them to inform citizens of their contractual obligations;
poudarja, da mora biti dodelitev javnih naročil opravljena pod preglednimi pogoji in ob enakem obravnavanju vseh zainteresiranih strani ter z upoštevanjem razmerja med ceno in uspešnostjo projekta kot končnega merila, da se izbere najboljša ponudba in ne samo najcenejša ponudba;
Stresses that public contracts must be awarded under transparent conditions whereby all interested parties are treated equally and the relationship between price and project performance is the ultimate criterion, so that they go to the best tender and not merely the cheapest tender;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede naknadno oceno direktiv o javnih naročilih ob upoštevanju stališč iz tega poročila; pričakuje, da bo pri tem pregledu sodeloval širok krog vseh zainteresiranih strani ob tesnem sodelovanju z Evropskim parlamentom; se zavzema za to, da se v vsaki reviziji zajamejo celoten okvir, direktiva o pravnih sredstvih pri javnih naročilih in tudi analiza nacionalnih zakonodaj, s katerimi se prenaša direktiva o pravnih sredstvih pri javnih naročilih, da bi preprečili nadaljnjo razdrobitev prava o javnih naročilih; meni, da praktičnih posledic te direktive trenutno še ni mogoče oceniti, saj še ni bila prenesena v nacionalno zakonodajo vseh držav članic;
Calls on the Commission to carry out an ex-post assessment of the public procurement directives, taking account of the opinions expressed in this report; expects that review to be carried out with the full involvement of all stakeholders and in close cooperation with the European Parliament; advocates that any revision take account of the whole framework and encompass the directive on review procedures concerning the award of public contracts as well as an analysis of the national laws transposing the directive on review procedures, in order to prevent any further fragmentation of public procurement law; takes the view that the practical impact of that directive cannot yet be assessed, as it has not been transposed in all the Member States;
opozarja, da je z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ki je začela veljati 1. decembra 2009, v primarni zakonodaji Evropske unije prvič priznana pravica do regionalne in lokalne samouprave (člen 4(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji); poudarja, da je Sodišče Evropske unije v številnih sodbah opozorilo na pravico do lokalne samouprave ter na to, da „javni organ [...] lahko naloge v javnem interesu, ki so jim naložene, izpolni z lastnimi [...] sredstvi [in tudi] v sodelovanju z drugimi javnimi organi“ (sodba v zadevi C-324/07); opozarja tudi na sodbo velikega senata Sodišča EU z dne 9. junija 2009 v zadevi C-480/06, kjer je navedeno, da pravo Skupnosti nikakor ne nalaga javnim organom, da morajo za skupno zagotovitev opravljanja nalog javnih storitev uporabiti posebne pravne oblike; meni, da za javno-javna partnerstva, kot so sporazumi o sodelovanju med lokalnimi oblastmi in oblike notranjega sodelovanja, ne veljajo direktive o javnih naročilih, če so kumulativno izpolnjena naslednja merila:
Points out that the Lisbon Treaty, which came into force on 1 December 2009, incorporates an acknowledgement of the right to regional and local self-government into European Union primary law for the first time (Article 4(2) of the Treaty on European Union); emphasises that in several judgments the CJEU has invoked the right to local self-government and made it clear that the ‘possibility for public authorities to use their own resources to perform the public-interest tasks conferred on them may be exercised in cooperation with other public authorities’ (judgment in Case C-324/07); draws attention, further, to the CJEU Grand Chamber judgment of 9 June 2009 in Case C-480/06, which found, further, that Community law does not require public authorities to use any particular legal form in order to carry out their public service tasks on a joint basis; accordingly, regards public-public partnerships, such as cooperation agreements between local authorities and forms of national cooperation, as falling outside the scope of the public procurement directives, provided that the following criteria are all met:
namen partnerstva je opravljanje nalog javnih storitev v pristojnosti vseh udeleženih lokalnih oblasti,
the purpose of the partnership is the provision of a public-service task conferred on all the local authorities concerned,
naloga se opravlja samo prek javnih organov, torej brez udeležbe zasebnikov, in
the task is carried out solely by the public authorities concerned, i.e. without the involvement of private individuals or undertakings, and
dejavnost se v glavnem opravlja v imenu udeleženih javnih organov;
the activity involved is essentially performed on behalf of the public authorities concerned;