natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje s spremljanjem delovanja sistema ter usklajuje in pomaga, kadar je potrebno ali kadar prosijo za podporo nacionalni organi;
Urges the Commission to continue to monitor the functioning of the system, and to coordinate and help where needed or where national authorities ask for assistance;
poleg tega meni, da bi potrošniki zaradi obveznega kritja pravnih stroškov v zvezi z zavarovanjem avtomobilske odgovornosti jasno odklanjali izvensodne poravnave, da bi bilo število sodnih obravnav večje, da bi bile zato delovne obremenitve sodstva neupravičeno večje in da bi obstajalo tveganje za destabilizacijo delovanja trga obstoječih in razvijajočih se prostovoljnih zavarovanj stroškov postopka;
Considers furthermore, in relation to Motor Third Party Liability insurance, that the compulsory cover of legal costs would create a clear disincentive for resorting to out-of-court settlements, would potentially increase the number of court proceedings and therefore lead to an unjustified increase in the workload for the judiciary, and would risk destabilising the functioning of the existing and evolving voluntary legal expenses insurance market;
zato meni, da bi negativni učinki vzpostavljanja sistema obveznega kritja pravnih stroškov pri zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti presegle morebitne prednosti;
Considers therefore on balance that the negative effects of introducing a system of compulsory cover of legal costs in Motor Third Party Liability insurance would outweigh the potential benefits;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z državami članicami sprejme vse potrebne ukrepe za večjo osveščenost v zvezi z zavarovanjem pravne varnosti, kot tudi drugimi oblikami zavarovanja, zlasti v novih državah članicah in si prizadeva predvsem za obveščanje potrošnikov o prednostih ponudbe in takšnega zavarovanja;
Urges the Commission to take, in partnership with Member States, the further steps necessary to raise awareness of legal protection insurance, as well as other insurance products, particularly in the new Member States, focussing on informing consumers of the advantages of being offered and holding one or another type of insurance cover;
v zvezi s tem preučuje vlogo nacionalnih regulativnih organov, ki je ključna za izvajanje najboljših praks drugih držav članic;
Considers in this context the role of national regulatory bodies to be crucial for the implementation of best practices from other Member States;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi varstvo potrošnikov predvsem s pozivom vsem državam članicam, naj spodbudijo svoje nacionalne regulativne organe in nacionalne zavarovalnice k prizadevanjem za večjo osveščenost o razpoložljivosti prostovoljnih zavarovanj stroškov postopka;
Calls therefore on the Commission to strengthen consumer protection primarily by urging Member States to encourage their national regulatory bodies and national insurance companies to raise awareness of the availability of voluntary legal expenses insurance;
meni, da lahko predpogodbene informacije o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti vsebujejo informacije o možnosti kritja stroškov postopka;
Considers that pre-contractual information on motor insurance could include information concerning the option to take out legal expenses coverage;
poziva države članice, naj od nacionalnih regulativnih organov in posrednikov zahtevajo, da svoje stranke obveščajo o možnih tveganjih in dodatnih prostovoljnih zavarovanjih, ki bi jih lahko potrošnik izkoristil, kot so na primer zavarovanje stroškov postopka, stroški asistence in zavarovanje proti kraji;
Calls on Member States to urge national regulatory bodies and intermediaries to inform customers of possible risks and of additional voluntary insurance which might benefit them, such as, for example, legal expenses insurance, assistance cover and insurance for theft;
poziva države članice, ki nimajo vzpostavljenih alternativnih sistemov za reševanje sporov v zvezi s poravnavami zahtevkov, naj uvedejo take sisteme, ki temeljijo na najboljši praksi drugih držav članic;
Calls on those Member States that do not have established alternative dispute resolution systems for settling claims to consider introducing such systems based on best practice from other Member States;
poziva, naj Komisija ne sodi prenagljeno o izidih naročenih študij o različnih odškodninah za telesne poškodbe na podlagi sprejete uredbe Rim II Uredba (ES) št. 864/2007 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. julija 2007 o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti ("Rim II") (UL L 199, 31.7.2007, str.
Asks the Commission not to prejudge the outcome of the studies commissioned on differential personal injury damages following on from the adoption of the Rome II Regulation Regulation (EC) No 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II) (OJ L 199, 31.7.2007, p.
, študij, ki bi lahko predlagale rešitve z zavarovalnicami in torej spremembo Četrte direktive o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti;
, which studies may suggest an insurance-based solution and consequent amendment of the Fourth motor insurance Directive;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o usklajeni strategiji za izboljšanje boja proti davčnim goljufijam ( 2008/2033(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 2 September 2008 on a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud ( 2008/2033(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 31. maja 2006 o potrebi po razvoju usklajene strategije za izboljšanje boja proti davčnim goljufijam ( KOM(2006)0254 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 31 May 2006 concerning the need to develop a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud ( COM(2006)0254 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. novembra 2007 o nekaterih ključnih elementih, ki vplivajo na oblikovanje strategije za boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV znotraj EU ( KOM(2007)0758 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 23 November 2007 concerning some key elements contributing to the establishment of the VAT anti-fraud strategy within the EU ( COM(2007)0758 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 16. aprila 2004 o uporabi dogovorov o upravnem sodelovanju v boju proti goljufijam na področju DDV ( KOM(2004)0260 ),
having regard to the Commission report of 16 April 2004 on the use of administrative cooperation arrangements in the fight against VAT fraud ( COM(2004)0260 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta po zasedanjih z dne 14. maja 2008, 5. junija 2007, 28. novembra 2006 in 7. junija 2006,
having regard to the Council conclusions following its meetings on 14 May 2008, 5 June 2007, 28 November 2006 and 7 June 2006,
ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 8/2007 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost UL C 20, 25.1.2008, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors" Special Report No 8/2007 concerning administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax OJ C 20, 25.1.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2005 o prispevku obdavčevanja in carinskih politik k lizbonski strategiji ( KOM(2005)0532 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 25 October 2005 on the contribution of taxation and customs policies to the Lisbon Strategy ( COM(2005)0532 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 22. februarja 2008 o ukrepih za spremembo sistema DDV zaradi boja proti goljufijam ( KOM(2008)0109 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 22 February 2008 on measures to change the VAT system to fight fraud ( COM(2008)0109 ),
ob upoštevanju predlogov Komisije z dne 17. marca 2008 za Direktivo Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost za boj proti davčnim goljufijam, povezanim s transakcijami znotraj Skupnosti, in za Uredbo Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1798/2003 za boj proti davčnim goljufijam, povezanim s transakcijami znotraj Skupnosti ( KOM(2008)0147 ),
having regard to the proposals from the Commission of 17 March 2008 for a Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions and for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 to combat tax evasion connected with intra-Community transactions ( COM(2008)0147 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočil iz sklepov Sveta po zasedanju z dne 14. maja 2008 o davčnih vprašanjih, povezanih s sporazumi med Skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami ter tretjimi državami,
having regard to the recommendations in the Council conclusions following its meeting on 14 May 2008 on tax issues related to agreements to be concluded by the Community and its Member States with third countries,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0312/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0312/2008 ),
ker imajo davčne goljufije hude posledice za proračune držav članic in sistem virov Evropske unije, kršijo načela poštenega in preglednega obdavčenja ter lahko povzročijo izkrivljanje konkurence, s čimer vplivajo na delovanje notranjega trga; ker so poštena podjetja zaradi davčnih goljufij v slabšem konkurenčnem položaju, izgubo davčnega prihodka pa na koncu poplačajo evropski davkoplačevalci z drugimi oblikami obdavčitve,
whereas tax fraud has serious consequences for Member States' budgets and the European Union's resource system, leads to violations of the principle of fair and transparent taxation, and is liable to bring about distortions of competition, thereby affecting the operation of the internal market; whereas honest businesses have competitive disadvantages because of tax fraud, and the loss of tax revenue is ultimately replenished by the European taxpayer through other forms of taxation;
ker davčne goljufije ogrožajo enakopravnost in davčno pravičnost, saj se izgube prihodka javnih financ pogosto nadomestijo z davki, ki najbolj prizadenejo manj premožne in najbolj poštene davkoplačevalce, ki nimajo možnosti ali namena, da bi se izognili svojim davčnim obveznostim ali jih utajili,
whereas fiscal fraud jeopardises equity and fiscal justice, since the loss of income to public finance is often compensated for by increases in tax, which hit the least affluent and most honest taxpayers who do not have the option or the intention of evading or infringing their tax obligations,
ker je rast čezmejne trgovine, ki je posledica vzpostavitve notranjega trga, povzročila, da število transakcij, pri katerih sta kraj obdavčenja in sedež osebe, ki je dolžna plačati DDV, v dveh različnih državah članicah, narašča,
whereas the growth of cross-border trade triggered by the establishment of the internal market has resulted in an increasing number of transactions in which the place of taxation and the place of establishment of the person liable to pay the VAT are in two different Member States,
ker so tisti, ki uporabljajo nove oblike davčnih goljufij, povezanih s čezmejnimi transakcijami, kot so davčni vrtiljak ali goljufije z manjkajočim gospodarskim subjektom znotraj Skupnosti, izkoristile razdrobljenost in luknje veljavnih davčnih sistemov, in ker so nujne spremembe v načinu delovanja DDV,
whereas those using new forms of tax fraud linked to cross-border transactions, such as carousel or missing-trader intra-Community fraud, have taken advantage of the fragmentation and loopholes of the current tax systems, and whereas changes in the way that VAT operates are necessary,
ker utaja DDV in goljufije v zvezi s tem vplivajo tudi na financiranje proračuna Evropske unije, saj morajo zaradi njih države članice prispevati več lastnih sredstev iz naslova bruto nacionalnega dohodka,
whereas VAT evasion and fraud have an impact on the financing of the budget of the European Union, as they result in an increased need to call on Member States" own resources based on gross national income,
ker boj proti goljufijam, čeprav je večinoma v pristojnosti držav članic, ni težava, ki bi jo bilo mogoče rešiti le na nacionalni ravni,
whereas combating fraud, while for the most part within Member State competence, is not a problem that can be solved at national level alone,
ker globalizacija z vse večjo vpletenostjo podjetij s sedežem v tretjih državah v davčne vrtiljake, širitvijo elektronskega trgovanja in globalizacijo storitvenih trgov povzroča čedalje večje težave v boju proti davčnim goljufijam na mednarodni ravni; ker ti dejavniki govorijo v prid izboljšanemu mednarodnemu sodelovanju, zlasti kar zadeva DDV,
whereas globalisation has led to increasing difficulties in combating fiscal fraud at an international level, given the increased involvement of undertakings established in third countries in carousel fraud, the expansion of electronic commerce and the globalisation of the services markets; whereas those factors militate strongly in favour of improving international cooperation, in particular as regards VAT,
ker se davčne goljufije v Evropski uniji pojavljajo zaradi trenutnega prehodnega sistema DDV, ki je preveč zapleten in je zaradi njega težko slediti transakcijam v Skupnosti, ki tako postanejo nepregledne in se jih zato lažje zlorablja,
whereas the extent of tax fraud in the European Union is due to the current transitional system of VAT, which is too complex, making intra-Community transactions difficult to track, opaque and thus open to abuse,
ker bi se morale Komisija in države članice pri preučevanju možnosti boja proti davčnim goljufijam čim bolj izogibati ukrepom, ki bi lahko povzročili nesorazmerno upravno obremenitev za podjetja in davčne uprave ali diskriminacijo med gospodarskimi subjekti,
whereas when examining options to tackle fiscal fraud, the Commission and the Member States should, to the greatest extent possible, avoid measures that could lead to a disproportionate administrative burden on businesses and tax administrations or that could discriminate between traders,
ker sta Komisija in Računsko sodišče večkrat izjavila, da sistem za izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami o dobavi blaga v Skupnosti ne zagotavlja ustreznih in pravočasnih podatkov za učinkovit boj proti goljufijam na področju DDV; ker so zato potrebna jasnejša in bolj zavezujoča pravila o sodelovanju med državami članicami ter Evropskim uradom za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF),
whereas both the Commission and the Court of Auditors have consistently stated that the system for exchanging information between Member States on intra-Community supplies of goods does not provide relevant or timely information for tackling VAT fraud efficiently; whereas this calls for clearer and more binding rules on cooperation between Member States and the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF),
ker je vsa razpoložljiva tehnologija, vključno z elektronskim shranjevanjem in prenosom nekaterih podatkov za DDV in trošarine, nujno potrebna za pravilno delovanje davčnih sistemov držav članic; ker je treba izboljšati pogoje za izmenjavo elektronsko shranjenih podatkov v posamezni državi članici in neposredni dostop držav članic do teh podatkov; ker morajo davčne oblasti držav članic osebne podatke skrbno obdelovati za določene namene in na podlagi privolitve zadevne osebe ali na drugi legitimni podlagi, določeni z zakonom,
whereas the use of all available technologies, including the electronic storage and transmission of certain data for VAT and excise duties, is indispensable for the proper functioning of Member States" tax systems; whereas the conditions for the exchange of, and direct access of Member States to, electronically stored data in each Member State should be improved; whereas Member States" tax authorities should handle personal data with due care for specified purposes and on the basis of the consent of the person concerned or some other legitimate basis laid down by law,
ker lahko gospodarski subjekti pridobijo le zelo razdrobljene podatke o davčnem statusu svojih strank na področju DDV,
whereas traders can often obtain only very fragmented information on the VAT status of their customers,
ker je treba poleg krepitve načinov za odkrivanje davčnih goljufij okrepiti tudi veljavno zakonodajo na področju pomoči pri izterjavi davkov, enakosti davčne obravnave in izvedljivosti v poslovanju podjetij,
whereas the strengthening of the means of detecting tax fraud should be accompanied by the reinforcement of the existing legislation on assistance in the recovery of taxes, equality in tax treatment and practicability for businesses,
Strategija EU na področju davčnih goljufij
An EU fiscal fraud strategy
ugotavlja, da mora biti namen strategije EU na področju davčnih goljufij boj proti davčnim izgubam zaradi davčnih goljufij z opredelitvijo področij, kjer so mogoče izboljšave zakonodaje EU in upravnega sodelovanja med državami članicami, s katerimi se učinkovito spodbuja zmanjšanje davčnih goljufij, pri čemer se ne povzročajo nepotrebne obremenitve za davčne uprave in davkoplačevalce;
Notes that the purpose of an EU fiscal fraud strategy must be to tackle tax losses due to fiscal fraud by identifying the areas in which improvements to both EC legislation and administrative cooperation between Member States can be made, which effectively promote the reduction of tax fraud, to the greatest extent possible without creating unnecessary burdens both for tax administrations and tax payers;
poziva države članice, da se resno spopadejo z davčnimi goljufijami;
Calls on the Member States finally to take the fight against fiscal fraud seriously;
opozarja, da sistem DDV, ki temelji na načelu države porekla – to pomeni, da se transakcije med državami članicami, za katere je obvezno plačati DDV, obdavčijo v državi porekla, namesto da bi imele ničelno stopnjo – ostaja dolgoročna rešitev za učinkovit boj proti davčnim goljufijam; ugotavlja, da zaradi načela države porekla proizvodov, s katerimi se trguje na notranjem trgu, ni treba izvzeti iz plačila DDV in jih nato obdavčiti v namembni državi; opozarja, da sistem DDV, ki temelji na načelu države porekla, ne bo operativen, če ne bo poskrbljeno za oblikovanje klirinškega sistema, kot je Komisija predlagala že leta 1987;
Recalls that the establishment of a VAT system based on the "origin principle", which implies that transactions between Member States liable to VAT bear the tax charged in the country of origin rather than being zero-rated, remains a long-term solution for combating tax fraud effectively; notes that the "origin principle" would make it unnecessary to exempt from VAT goods traded in the internal market and to tax them subsequently in the country of destination; recalls that in order to be operational, a VAT system based on the "origin principle" requires the establishment of a clearing system, as originally proposed by the Commission in 1987;
obžaluje nasprotovanje nekaterih držav članic v zadnjih desetih letih, kar je onemogočilo oblikovanje učinkovite strategije EU za boj proti davčnim goljufijam;
Regrets the blockading attitude of some Member States in the last ten years, which has thwarted any effective EU strategy to counter fiscal fraud;
obžaluje, da Svet kljub nenehnim analizam, zahtevam in pomislekom ni sprejel učinkovite strategije za boj proti davčnim goljufijam;
Regrets that in spite of repeated analyses, demands, and objections, the Council has not yet adopted an effective strategy for the fight against fiscal fraud;
poziva Komisijo, naj si kljub številnim neuspehom v preteklih desetletjih še naprej odločno prizadeva za rešitev tega problema;
Urges the Commission not to desist from tackling the problem head-on, despite repeated failures in past decades;
poziva k enotni statistični raziskavi v vseh državah članicah, kar bo osnova za preglednost in nacionalne ukrepe za boj proti goljufijam;
Calls for a uniform data survey in all the Member States as the basis for transparency and national measures against tax fraud;
obžaluje, da ni mogoče ustrezno oceniti niti dejanskega obsega te težave niti spremljanja pozitivnih oziroma negativnih sprememb, ker ni na voljo podatkov, zbranih na nacionalni ravni;
Regrets, due to the lack of data collected at national level, that the real extent of the problem cannot be properly assessed and the monitoring of changes, whether positive or negative, cannot be properly evaluated;
poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o usklajenem evropskem sistemu zbiranja podatkov o davčnih goljufijah in njihove statistične obdelave, da bo mogoče ta pojav točno oceniti v vseh njegovih razsežnostih;
Calls on the Commission to consider a harmonised European system for collecting data and producing statistics on fiscal fraud, so as to reach an assessment of the full extent of the phenomenon that is as accurate as possible;
znova opozarja, da sive ekonomije ne bo mogoče izkoreniniti brez uvedbe ustreznih spodbud; poleg tega predlaga, da bi države članice prek lizbonske preglednice poročale, v kolikšni meri jim je uspelo sivo ekonomijo zmanjšati;
Recalls that the elimination of the informal economy cannot be realised without the implementation of appropriate incentives; suggests, moreover, that Member States should report, via the Lisbon scoreboard, the extent to which they have succeeded in reducing their informal economies;
Sedanji sistem DDV in njegove pomanjkljivosti
The current VAT system and its weaknesses
ugotavlja, da so davčne goljufije, povezane z DDV, zlasti skrb zbujajoče za delovanje notranjega trga, če imajo neposreden čezmejni vpliv, povzročajo znatne izgube prihodka in neposredno vplivajo na proračun EU;
Notes that VAT-related tax fraud is a matter of particular concern for the functioning of the internal market in so far as it has a direct cross-border impact, involves substantial loss of revenue and directly affects the EU budget;
poudarja, da je bil sedanji sistem DDV, uveden leta 1993, predviden kot prehodni sistem in da je Parlament zahteval, da Komisija predloži predloge za sprejetje končne odločitve o dokončnem sistemu DDV do leta 2010;
Reiterates that the current VAT system, established in 1993, was intended to be only a transitional system and that Parliament has requested that the Commission put forward proposals aimed at making a final decision on the definitive VAT system by 2010;
ocenjuje, da se je zaradi prostega pretoka ljudi, blaga, storitev in kapitala na notranjem trgu od leta 1993 ter napredka na področju novih tehnologij, zaradi katerega je na voljo vse več majhnih proizvodov visoke vrednosti, čedalje težje boriti proti goljufijam na področju DDV, pri čemer to težavo še bolj zaostruje zapleten in razdrobljen sedanji sistem, ki otežuje sledenje transakcijam, zato je več možnosti za zlorabe;
Asserts that the free circulation of persons, goods, services and capital within the internal market since 1993, as well as advances in new technology as regards small, high-value goods, have combined to make it increasingly difficult to combat VAT fraud, this being exacerbated by the complexity and fragmented nature of the current system which makes transactions difficult to track and thus more open to abuse;
ugotavlja, da so čedalje pogostejše goljufije v zvezi z manjkajočim gospodarskim subjektom in namerne zlorabe sistema DDV, katerega pomanjkljivosti s takšnimi prevarami izkoriščajo kriminalne tolpe; opozarja na raziskavo goljufije z vrtiljakom DDV, ki jo je sprožil Eurojust in v katero je bilo vključenih 18 držav članic, vrednost davčne goljufije pa je znašala okoli 2,1 milijarde EUR;
Notes the increasing occurrence of missing-trader fraud and the deliberate abuse of the VAT system by criminal gangs who set up such schemes to take advantage of the failures in the system; and highlights the VAT carousel fraud case launched by Eurojust, involving 18 Member States and tax fraud amounting to an estimated EUR 2,1 billion;