natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
znova ponavlja, da je načelo univerzalnosti človekovih pravic in nediskriminacije temelj, na podlagi katerega je mogoče izboljšati legitimno demokratično vodenje in politični dialog v SPS;
Reiterates the principle of the universality of human rights and non-discrimination as the basis upon which to enhance legitimate democratic governance and the political dialogue at the JPA;
spodbuja SPS, naj okrepi vlogo odbora za politične zadeve, da bi postal v okviru partnerstva med državami AKP in EU resničen forum za razpravo o spoštovanju človekovih pravic, demokratizaciji družbe ter preprečevanju in reševanju sporov;
Encourages the JPA to strengthen the role of its Committee on Political Affairs so as to make the Assembly a genuine forum for a debate within the ACP-EU partnership on respect for human rights, democratisation of society, and conflict prevention and resolution;
prav tako pozdravlja poročilo odbora SPS za politične zadeve o svetovnem upravljanju, sprejeto v Luandi, ki je zahtevalo korenite spremembe v svetovnih finančnih institucijah;
Welcomes, further, the JPA Committee on Political Affairs report on global governance, adopted in Luanda, which called for major reforms of the world's financial institutions;
je seznanjen z namero odbora SPS za gospodarski razvoj, finance in trgovino, da se bo še naprej ukvarjal s sporazumi o gospodarskem sodelovanju in z načini, kako se rešiti iz krize;
Notes the intention of the JPA Committee on Economic Development, Finance and Trade to continue its work on EPAs and on ways of getting out of the crisis;
ceni trud odbora SPS za socialne zadeve in okolje, vložen v poročilo o delu otrok, in njegovo namero o preučitvi in pripravi razprave na temo okolja ter socialnih razmer v državah AKP;
Highlights the work of the JPA Committee on Social Affairs and the Environment with regard to its report on child labour and its intention to organise analysis and debate in relation to the environment and the social situation in ACP countries;
prav tako pozdravlja v letu 2009 sprejeta poročila in resolucije o podnebnih spremembah, po zaslugi katerih je lahko SPS izrazila svoja stališča na vrhunskem srečanju v Københavnu;
Welcomes, further, the reports and resolutions on climate change adopted in 2009 which enabled the voice of the JPA to be heard at the Copenhagen Summit;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da nevladni akterji vedno pogosteje sodelujejo na zasedanjih SPS, kar se je izkazalo v razpravi, ob zaključku katere je bila sprejeta omenjena izjava iz Port Moresbyja o sedanji svetovni krizi, kakor tudi s poročili gospodarskih in socialnih partnerjev o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, predstavljenih na zasedanju SPS v Ljubljani;
Welcomes the growing involvement of non-state actors in JPA sessions, as illustrated by the debate resulting in the adoption of the abovementioned Port Moresby Declaration on the current international crisis and by the economic partners' report on EPAs submitted at the JPA session in Ljubljana;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, svetu AKP, predsedstvu SPS ter vladama in parlamentoma Češke in Angole.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the ACP Council, the JPA Bureau and the governments and parliaments of the Czech Republic and Angola.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. novembra 2010 o vidikih civilnega, gospodarskega, družinskega in mednarodnega zasebnega prava v Akcijskem načrtu za uresničevanje Stockholmskega programa ( 2010/2080(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 23 November 2010 on civil law, commercial law, family law and private international law aspects of the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme ( 2010/2080(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 67 in 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 67 and 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. junija 2009 z naslovom Območje svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane ( KOM(2009)0262 ), ki vsebuje pregled prednostnih nalog Komisije glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) za obdobje 2010-2014, njene ocene haaškega programa in akcijskega načrta ( KOM(2009)0263 ) in z njo povezane preglednice izvajanja ( SEC(2009)0765 ), pa tudi prispevkov nacionalnih parlamentov, civilne družbe ter agencij in organov EU,
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 June 2009 entitled ‘An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen’ ( COM(2009)0262 ), which outlines its priorities in the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) for 2010-2014, together with its evaluation of the Hague Programme and Action Plan ( COM(2009)0263 ) and the associated implementation scoreboard ( SEC(2009)0765 ), as well as to the contributions made by national parliaments, civil society and EU agencies and bodies,
ob upoštevanju dokumenta predsedstva Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2009 z naslovom Stockholmski program – Odprta in varna Evropa za državljane (17024/09),
having regard to the Council Presidency's document of 2 December 2009 entitled ‘The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe serving the citizen’ (17024/09),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 o stockholmskem programu UL C 285 E, 21.10.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the Stockholm Programme OJ C 285 E, 21.10.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. aprila 2010 o akcijskem načrtu izvajanja stockholmskega programa ( COM(2010)0171 ),
having regard to the Commission's Communication of 20 April 2010 on an Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme ( COM(2010)0171 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. junija 2010 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov – stockholmski akcijski načrt Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0242 .
having regard to its resolution of 17 June 2010 on Judicial Training – Stockholm Action Plan Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0242 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0252/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0252/2010 ),
ker je območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v skupni pristojnosti Unije in držav članic,
whereas AFSJ is a shared competence between the Union and the Member States,
ker člen 67 PDEU poudarja spoštovanje različnih pravnih sistemov in tradicij ter olajšanje dostopa do sodnega varstva, zlasti s pomočjo načela vzajemnega priznavanja; ker to zahteva vzajemno zaupanje, to pa zahteva boljše razumevanje različnih pravnih tradicij in metod,
whereas Article 67 TFEU emphasises respect for the different legal systems and traditions and access to justice, which is to be facilitated, in particular through the principle of mutual recognition; whereas this requires mutual trust and, in turn, mutual trust requires a reinforced understanding of the different legal traditions and methods,
ker je bil od časa, ko je Unija prvič dobila pristojnost za pravosodje in notranje zadeve in ko je bilo posledično ustanovljeno območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, storjen velik napredek na področju civilnega prava, ki je temeljil in gradil na različnih medvladno sklenjenih konvencijah o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu; ker Komisija zdaj predlaga zelo ambiciozen načrt, ki izpolnjuje številne zahteve, ki jih je Parlament nedavno postavil,
whereas, since the Union first obtained competence for justice and home affairs and the subsequent creation of the AFSJ, huge progress has been made in the area of civil justice, building and enlarging on the various private international law conventions concluded intergovernmentally; whereas the Commission is now proposing a very ambitious plan, which responds to a substantial number of the demands that Parliament has made in the recent period,
ker je v luči tega ambicioznega načrta in pomembnih dosežkov, ki jih je EU že naredila na tem področju, čas, da stopimo korak nazaj in razmislimo o tem, kaj počnemo na področju civilnega prava, predvsem zato, da sprejmemo bolj strateški in manj razdrobljeni pristop, ki bi temeljil na pravih potrebah državljanov in podjetij pri uveljavljanju njihovih pravic in svoboščin na enotnem trgu; ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je težko sprejemati zakonodajo na področju v skupni pristojnosti, kjer usklajevanje pogosto ni možno in se je treba izogibati prekrivanju, ter je zato treba spoštovati in omogočiti popolnoma različne pravne pristope in ustavne tradicije, pa tudi na novo določiti pristop Unije do tega področja zaradi boljšega razumevanja, kaj želimo doseči in kako se najboljše spopasti s težavami, kar bi bilo del širšega načrta; ker je bistveno osredotočiti se predvsem na zagotavljanje funkcionalnosti ukrepov, ki so bili že sprejeti, in utrjevanje že doseženega napredka,
whereas in the light of this ambitious plan and the huge achievements already made by the EU in this field, it is time to stand back and reflect on what we are doing in the field of civil law with a view primarily to adopting a more strategic and less fragmented approach based on the real needs of citizens and businesses when exercising their rights and freedoms in the single market, and taking account of the difficulties of legislating in an area of shared competence where harmonisation is only infrequently an option and overlapping needs to be avoided, and where there is a consequent need to respect and accommodate radically different legal approaches and constitutional traditions, and also with a view to conceptualising the Union's approach to this area in order better to understand what we are seeking to accomplish and how best to tackle the problems that have to be confronted, as part of an overall plan;whereas it is essential to focus in the first place on ensuring the functionality of the measures that have already been put in place and consolidating the progress that has already been made,
ker je naslednja stopnja usklajevanje ali približevanje, ki je primerno za nekatera področja, kjer je standardizacija zaželena, če že ne bistvena – denimo na področju varstva potrošnikov, vendar na katero se je v območju svobode, pravice in varnosti možno sklicevati le v omejenem obsegu,
whereas, next, there is harmonisation or approximation which lends itself to certain areas where standardisation is desirable, if not essential – e.g. in the area of consumer protection – but recourse to which is limited in the AFJS,
ker bo priprava osnutka evropskega pogodbenega prava ena najpomembnejših pobud za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v prihodnjih letih ter lahko privede do tako imenovanega neobveznega 28. režima civilnega prava kot alternative tradicionalnemu načinu usklajevanja zakonodaje na posebnih področjih,
whereas drafting a European Contract Law will be one of the most important initiatives for the AFSJ in the coming years and may result in a so-called optional 28th civil law regime as an alternative to the traditional way of harmonising legislation in specific areas,
ker, nazadnje, obstajajo samostojni instrumenti in ukrepi na področju procesnega prava; ukrepi na teh področjih so na več načinov ključni za obravnavanje čezmejnih sporov, saj ne glede na to, do kakšne mere je materialno pravo usklajeno, se državljani in podjetja srečujejo z ovirami v obliki nacionalnega procesnega prava,
whereas, lastly, there are the stand-alone instruments and action in the area of procedural law; measures in these areas are the key in many ways to dealing with cross-border disputes, since no matter to what extent substantive law is harmonised, citizens and businesses tend to come up against barriers in the form of national procedural law,
ker bi bilo treba na soobstoj različnih pravnih sistemov v Uniji gledati kot na prednost, ki služi kot navdih za pravne sisteme po vsem svetu; razhajanja med pravnimi sistemi vseeno ne bi smela biti ovira za nadaljnji razvoj evropskega prava; ker jasna in konceptualna razhajanja med pravnimi sistemi sama po sebi niso problematična; ker je treba vseeno odpraviti škodljive pravne posledice za državljane , ki izhajajo iz teh razhajanj; ker bi bilo treba uporabiti koncept regulatornega posnemanja ali pristop „od spodaj navzgor“, in sicer prek spodbujanja gospodarskih in intelektualnih izmenjav med različnimi pravnimi sistemi; ker sposobnost razumeti in obvladovati razlike med našimi pravnimi sistemi lahko izvira le iz evropske pravosodne kulture, ki jo je treba negovati s pomočjo širjenja znanja in s komunikacijo, s preučevanjem primerjalnega prava in z drastično spremembo načina poučevanja prava na univerzah ter sodelovanja sodnikov pri svojem izobraževanju in strokovnem razvoju, kakor je obrazloženo v resoluciji Parlamenta s 17. junija 2010, vključno z dodatnimi prizadevanji, da se premagajo jezikovne ovire; ker je treba o tem razmišljati in to načrtovati sedaj, čeprav bo zahtevalo čas,
whereas the co-existence of different legal systems within the Union should be seen as a strength which has served as an inspiration for legal systems all over the world; however, divergences between legal systems should not constitute a barrier to the further development of European law; whereas the explicit and conceptual divergence between legal systems is not in itself problematic; whereas, however, it is necessary to address the adverse legal consequences for citizens arising from this divergence; whereas the concept of regulatory emulation, or a ‘bottom up’ approach to convergence, should be applied through the encouragement of economic and intellectual communication between different legal systems; whereas the ability to comprehend and manage the differences between our legal systems can only come from a European judicial culture which needs to be nurtured through the sharing of knowledge and communication, the study of comparative law and a radical shift in the way law is taught in the universities and judges participate in training and professional development, as explained in Parliament's resolution of 17 June 2010,including additional efforts to overcome linguistic barriers; whereas although this will take time, it is necessary to reflect on it and plan for it now,
ker bi bilo treba medtem spodbujati in podpirati več dialoga in strokovnih stikov na evropski ravni, da se omogočijo spremembe v poučevanju in da se programi določajo v skladu s potrebami odvetnikov, njihovih strank ter trga kot celote; ker bi moralo prihajajoče sporočilo Komisije o akcijskem načrtu o evropskem usposabljanju za vse pravniške poklice upoštevati različne tradicije in metode poučevanja, pa tudi različne potrebe odvetnikov, ki delujejo na različnih geografskih območjih ali na različnih področjih, ter obenem spodbujati izmenjavo najboljše prakse,
whereas, in the meantime, greater dialogue and professional contact should be encouraged and promoted at European level in order to enable changes in teaching and programmes to be determined according to the needs of practitioners, their clients and the market as a whole; whereas the Commission's forthcoming communication on an Action Plan on European training for all legal professions should take account of the different teaching traditions and methods and also the different needs of practitioners operating in different geographical or practice areas, while fostering the exchange of best practices,
ker je bistveno, da se pri izgradnji evropske pravosodne kulture upoštevajo odvetniki; ker je sicer samoumevno, da države članice in nacionalni poklicni organi ohranijo odgovornost za določanje najprimernejšega usposabljanja, s katerim se odzivajo na potrebe odvetnikov in njihovih strank v vsaki državi članici skladno z načelom subsidiarnosti, ter da so nacionalni poklicni organi v najboljšem položaju, da ugotovijo, katere so te potrebe, saj so bližje odvetnikom in trgu, na katerem ti delujejo, vseeno pa imajo ti organi bistveno vlogo tudi na evropski ravni; ker je nujno vključiti obstoječe strukture, zlasti univerze in poklicne organizacije, ter graditi na njih; ker je treba opraviti temeljito revizijo usposabljanja sodnikov in odvetnikov ter univerzitetnih učnih programov; ker je treba spodbuditi resen razmislek o tem, kako lahko Unija pri tem učinkovito pomaga, in spodbuditi pristojne nacionalne organe, da sprejmejo odgovornost za ta projekt,
whereas it is vital not to leave practitioners out of account in building a European judicial culture; whereas although it is self-evident that Member States and national professional bodies maintain responsibility for determining the most appropriate training to address the needs of lawyers and their clients in each Member State in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity and that the national professional bodies are best placed to identify those needs because they are closer to the practitioners and the market in which they operate, those bodies have a vital role to play at European level; whereas it is essential to involve and draw upon existing structures, particularly the universities and professional organisations; whereas there is a need for a root-and-branch revision of judicial and practitioner training and university syllabuses; whereas it is essential to initiate serious reflection on how the Union may effectively assist this and encourage the competent national authorities to accept ownership of this project,
ker ravno to sestavlja Evropo in je izziv za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice ter tega ne bi smeli razumeti kot protislovnega za razvoj in poučevanje resnične evropske pravne kulture,
whereas this is the very stuff of Europe and the challenge of the AFSJ, and should not be seen as contradictory to the development and teaching of a real European legal culture,
ker določba iz preambule Lizbonske pogodbe „da položijo temelje vse tesnejši zvezi med narodi Evrope,“ zahteva zmanjšanje dejanske in občutene razdalje med Evropsko unijo, njenim pravom in njenimi državljani,
whereas the determination in the Preamble to the Lisbon Treaty to ‘lay the foundations of an ever closer union among the peoples of Europe’ requires a narrowing of the real and perceived distance between the European Union, its law and its citizens,
ker mora pravo Unije služiti državljanom, zlasti na področju družinskega prava in osebnega statusa,
whereas Union law must be at the service of citizens, notably in the areas of family law and civil status,
ker mora Komisija zagotoviti, da se v stockholmskemu akcijskemu načrtu resnično odražajo potrebe posameznih državljanov in podjetij, zlasti majhnih in srednjih podjetij, po več Evrope (kar zadeva mobilnost, pravice zaposlenih, potrebe podjetij, enake možnosti) ter da se v njem istočasno spodbujata pravna varnost in dostop do hitrega in učinkovitega sodnega varstva,
whereas the Commission must make sure that the Stockholm Action Plan truly reflects the needs of individual citizens and business, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, for more Europe (in respect of mobility, employment rights, the needs of business, equal opportunities) while promoting legal certainty and access to rapid and efficient justice,
ker je treba v zvezi s tem vedno večjo pozornost nameniti poenostavitvi mehanizmov pravosodja in pravosodnih sistemov ter zagotavljanju jasnejših in dostopnejših postopkov, ob upoštevanju potrebe po nižanju stroškov, zlasti v sedanjih gospodarskih okoliščinah,
whereas in this context ever-increasing attention must be paid to simplifying the machinery of justice and the judicial system and securing clearer and more accessible procedures bearing in mind the need to save costs, particularly in the present economic climate,
ker poudarek na avtonomiji strank v nedavnih pobudah EU glede občutljivega vprašanja družinskega prava z mednarodnimi posledicami, če se ne uporabijo jasne omejitve, prinaša tveganje, da se omogoči nesprejemljiva praksa izbiranja najugodnejšega sodišča,
whereas the emphasis laid on party autonomy in recent EU initiatives on the sensitive issue of family law with transnational implications entails the risk, unless clear restrictions are applied, of opening the door to the unacceptable practice of forum shopping,
čestita Komisiji za predlagani akcijski načrt;
Congratulates the Commission on its proposed Action Plan;
vseeno meni, da je pravi čas za razmislek o prihodnjem razvoju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice in poziva Komisijo, naj začne široko razpravo, ki bi vključevala vse zainteresirane strani, zlasti sodnike in odvetnike;
Considers nonetheless that the time is ripe for reflection on the future development of the AFSJ, and calls on the Commission to initiate a wide-ranging debate involving all interested parties, including in particular judges and practitioners;
poziva Komisijo, naj nujno – v obliki naknadne ocene učinka – zabeleži izkušnje z ukrepi, ki so bili že sprejeti na področjih civilnega in družinskega prava, da se oceni njihova učinkovitost in ugotovi, v kakšni meri so se izkazali za učinkovite pri izpolnjevanju svojih ciljev in zadovoljevanju potreb državljanov, podjetij in odvetnikov; meni, da bi bilo treba istočasno opraviti raziskavo, ki bi zajela zlasti nacionalna ministrstva za pravosodje, pravniške poklice, poslovni svet in združenja potrošnikov, da bi se ugotovilo, na katerih področjih so potrebni in zaželeni novi ukrepi s področja pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah;
Calls on the Commission to take stock as a matter of urgency, by means of an ex post impact assessment, of the measures which have already been adopted in the field of civil and family law, with a view to appraising their effectiveness and ascertaining to what extent they have proved successful in achieving their aims and satisfying the needs of citizens, business and practitioners; considers that at the same time a survey should be carried out covering in particular national Ministries of Justice, the legal professions, the business community and consumer organisations, in order to ascertain in what areas new measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil matters are necessary and desirable;
poziva Komisijo, naj ukrepa v skladu z resolucijo z dne 17. junija 2010 o izobraževanju pravosodnih organov, ob tem pa naj se posvetuje s Parlamentom;
Calls on the Commission to act on its resolution of 17 June 2010 on judicial training, while conferring with Parliament;
ponovno poudarja potrebo, da se uporabijo vsa razpoložljiva sredstva za vzgojo evropske pravosodne kulture, zlasti s pomočjo pravnega izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Underscores once again the need to use every possible means to nurture a European judicial culture, particularly through legal education and training;
priporoča, naj bodo programi izmenjave po zgledu programa Erasmus, ki so predlagani v akcijskem načrtu, le ena v vrsti pobud, ki spodbujajo navpično in vodoravno komunikacijo med nacionalnimi in evropskimi sodišči; opozarja na dejstvo, da bo Parlament naročil študijo, ki bo pregledala stanje nacionalnih programov izobraževanja in šol za pravosodne organe, da se tudi opredelijo najboljše prakse na tem področju;
Recommends that the ‘Erasmus-style’ exchange programmes proposed in the Action Plan should be just one of a series of initiatives fostering vertical and horizontal communication between national and European courts; draws attention to the fact that Parliament is to commission a study which will take stock of national training programmes and schools for the judiciary with a view also to identifying best practices in this sector;
ugotavlja, da bi morale biti obstoječe nacionalne izobraževalne institucije in omrežja, ki so glavni dejavniki pri izvrševanju prava Unije v državah članicah in imajo neposreden stik z nacionalnimi sodišči in pravosodnimi organi ter poglobljeno razumevanje nacionalne pravne kulture in potreb, sredstvo za razvoj skupne evropske pravosodne kulture;
Notes that existing national training institutions and networks, as the ‘front line’ of the implementation of Union law in the Member States and having as they do direct contact with national courts and judiciaries and a deep understanding of national legal cultures and needs, should be vehicles for the development of a common European judicial culture;