natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
5 podpira imenovanje posebnega predstavnika EU na visoki ravni za človekove pravice in ponovno poudarja potrebo po državnih strategijah človekovih pravic in demokracije;
5 Supports the appointment of a high-level EU Special Representative for Human Rights and stresses again the necessity of the human rights and democracy country strategies;
10. odobrava poskuse v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice, da bi sestavili medregijsko delovno skupino za razmere v Belorusiji; nujno poziva Svet, naj da izjavo, s katero bo odločno obsodil grobe kršitve človekovih pravic v državi in zatiranje demokratične opozicije ter navadnih državljanov po predsedniških volitvah 19. decembra 2010, ter naj s tem v zvezi sprejme resolucijo;
Welcomes the attempts within the UNHRC to put together a cross-regional working group on the situation in Belarus; urges UNHRC to make a statement strongly condemning gross violations of human rights in the country and repressions against democratic opposition and ordinary citizens following presidential elections on December 19, 2010 and to adopt a resolution on the matter;
17. glede na poročila posebnih poročevalcev o stanju človekovih pravic v Demokratični ljudski republiki Koreji in v Mjanmarju (Burma) ponavlja poziv EU, naj javno podpre ustanovitev preiskovalnih komisij OZN, ki bodo ocenile kršitve človekovih pravic v teh državah in presodile, v kolikšnem obsegu te kršitve štejejo kot zločini proti človečnosti; obžaluje, ker Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja ne sodeluje s posebnim poročevalcem in zahteva podaljšanje mandata posebnega poročevalca za Mjanmar/Burmo;
In view of the reports by the Special Rapporteurs on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and on the human rights situation in Myanmar/Burma, restates its call for the EU to publicly support the establishment of UN commissions of inquiry to assess human rights violations in these countries and to assess to what extent these constitute crimes against humanity; regrets the lack of cooperation of DPRK with the Special Rapporteur and requests the extension of the mandate of the Special rapporteur for Myanmar/Burma;
24. vztraja, da je v Svetu za človekove pravice nujno treba ohraniti prostor za civilno družbo, da bi povečali sodelovanje civilne družbe v tem dialogu in nevladnim organizacijam omogočili nove priložnosti, da vzpostavijo dialog s posameznimi državami;
Insists that it is essential to maintain a space for civil society into the HRC in order to enhance civil society participation in the dialogue, opening up new opportunities for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to enter into dialogue within particular States;
28. obžaluje, da prvi krog pregleda v nekaterih državah ni izpolnil pričakovanj, da bo to pregleden, neselektiven in nekonflikten postopek; glede tega priznava vlogo, ki so jo imele držav članic EU pri prizadevanjih, da bi presegli blokovski način razmišljanja, ter jih spodbuja, naj zagotovijo tehnično pomoč za lažje uresničevanje priporočil;
Regrets that the first cycle of the review of certain countries has not lived up to the expectations of a transparent, non-selective and non-confrontational process; acknowledges in this regard the role EU Member States have played in trying to break through the ‘bloc mentality’, encourages EU Member States to provide technical assistance to help the recommendations be implemented;
31. obsoja poskuse, da bi omajali neodvisnost posebnih postopkov s postavljanjem vlad v vlogo nadzornika teh postopkov; poudarja, da bi kakršen koli nadzor politiziral in zmanjšal učinkovitost tega sistema;
Condemns attempts to undermine the independence of Special Procedures by putting governments in an oversight position over the Special Procedures, stresses that any sort of control would politicize and damage the effectiveness of the system;
36. ponavlja svoje stališče o konceptu „razžalitve ver“ in četudi priznava, da se je treba v celoti posvetiti problemu diskriminacije verskih manjšin, meni, da vključitev tega koncepta v protokol o dodatnih standardih glede rasizma, rasne diskriminacije, ksenofobije in vseh oblik diskriminacije, ni primerna; pozdravlja prireditev, ki jo je delegacija EU pripravila ob robu glavnega dogajanja v obeležitev 25. obletnice vzpostavitve funkcije posebnega poročevalca za svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja; poziva EU, naj si z glavnimi podporniki resolucije prizadeva najti alternativo resoluciji o boju proti razžalitvi ver, ki bo predstavljena; podpira medregijsko izjavo o pravicah lezbijk, homoseksualcev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev, ki bo predstavljena;
Reiterates in this regard its position concerning the concept of ‘defamation of religions’ and, while recognising the need to address fully the problem of discrimination against religious minorities, considers that the inclusion of this concept in the Protocol on complementary standards on racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and all forms of discrimination is not appropriate; welcome the side event organised by EU delegation to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; requests the EU to engage with the main sponsors of the resolution to find an alternative to the resolution on defamation that will be presented; supports the cross-regional statement that will be presented on the LGBT rights;
37 ponovno izraža podporo dejavni udeležbi EU v delu Sveta OZN za človekove pravice že vse od ustanovitve, in sicer s podpiranjem ali sopodpiranjem resolucij, uradnimi izjavami ter udeležbo v interaktivnih razgovorih in razpravah; priznava zaveze EU glede obravnavanja razmer v različnih državah v okviru Sveta za človekove pravice in poudarja, da je treba te zaveze odločno uresničevati;
37 Reiterates its support for the EU’s active participation in the work of the UNHRC since its establishment, namely through sponsoring or co-sponsoring resolutions, issuing statements, intervening in interactive dialogues and debates; recognises the commitments made by the EU to addressing country situations in the UNHRC and stresses the importance that these commitments be strongly implemented;
40 obžaluje, da je pogost stranski učinek prizadevanj EU za soglasje zmanjševanje njenih ambicij, in meni, da bi se morala odločneje zavzemati za resolucije o posameznih državah in jih odločneje vlagati;
40 Regrets that as a side-effect of its efforts to seek consensus, the EU often appears to be lowering its ambitions, and believes the EU should be much bolder in putting forward and/or running with country resolutions;
42. na praktični ravni opozarja, da je pomembno imeti v Ženevi in New Yorku večjo in dobro financirano delegacijo EU; poudarja, da mora biti dogajanje v Ženevi in New Yorku sestavni del zunanje politike EU, pri čemer naj bo v žarišču izboljšanje notranje usklajenosti, ob tem pa tudi poudarja, da morata dvo- in mnogostranska raven vzajemno delovati;
Draws attention, on a practical level, to the importance of having a larger, well-resourced EU Delegation in Geneva and New York; stresses that what happens in Geneva and New York must be an integral part of EU foreign policy, with a focus on improving internal co-ordination and stresses, too, the need for good interplay between the bilateral and multilateral levels;
46. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, varnostnemu svetu OZN, generalnemu sekretarju OZN, predsedujočemu 64. generalne skupščine, predsedniku Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, visoki komisarki OZN za človekove pravice ter delovni skupini EU-OZN, ki jo je ustanovil odbor za zunanje zadeve.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission/ High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Security Council, the UN Secretary-General, the President of the 64th General Assembly, the President of the UN Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the EU-UN Working Group established by the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
o 16. zasedanju Sveta za človekove pravice (v Ženevi od 28. februarja do 25. marca 2011)
on the 16th session of the UN Human Rights Council (Geneva, 28 February to 25 March 2011)
PE459.702v01-00 B7‑0164/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o 16. zasedanju Sveta za človekove pravice (v Ženevi od 28. februarja do 25. marca 2011)
PE459.702v01-00 B7‑0164/2011 European Parliament resolution on the 16th session of the UN Human Rights Council (Geneva, 28 February to 25 March 2011)
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Svetu Združenih narodov za človekove pravice,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC),
– ob upoštevanju prihodnjega 16. zasedanja Sveta za človekove pravice, ki bo potekalo od 28. februarja do 25. marca 2011,
– having regard to the 16th session of the UNHRC, to be held from 28 February to 25 March 2011,
A. ker šestdeset let po proglasitvi splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah vsakdanji boj proti diskriminaciji in za izvajanje vseh človekovih pravic – socialnih, gospodarskih, kulturnih, državljanskih in političnih – še vedno poteka,
A. whereas, 60 years after the proclamation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the fight against discrimination and for the full realisation of all human rights – social, economic and cultural rights as well as civil and political rights – remains a daily struggle,
B. ker morajo Evropska unija in njene države članice v svojih politikah zagotoviti spoštovanje človekovih pravic, da bi okrepile in zagotovile verodostojnost Evropske unije v Svetu za človekove pravice,
B. whereas the EU and its Member States need to ensure respect for human rights in their own policies in order to strengthen – and make credible – the EU position in the UNHRC,
C. ker je Svet za človekove pravice kljub svojim pomanjkljivostim pomembna platforma za razprave o človekovih pravicah in boj proti njihovim kršitvam,
C. whereas, despite its shortcomings, the UNHRC is an important platform for discussion of human rights and of action to combat human rights violations,
D. ker bo pregled Sveta za človekove pravice potekal dvotirno: v New Yorku se bo razpravljalo o njegovem statusu, v Ženevi pa o njegovih postopkih; ker so v tem letu predvidene številne pobude in neformalna srečanja,
D. whereas the review of the UNHRC will follow two tracks, with the legal status of the body to be discussed in New York, and the procedures in Geneva; whereas a number of initiatives and informal meetings will take place during the coming year,
E. ker bo med 16. zasedanjem Sveta za človekove pravice v Ženevo odpotovala tudi delegacija pododbora Parlamenta za človekove pravice, kot je bilo to v preteklih letih ob zasedanjih tega sveta in pred tem Komisije Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, ki je bila njegova predhodnica,
E. whereas a delegation from Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights will travel to Geneva for the 16th session of the UNHRC, following the practice of previous years for UNHRC sessions and, before that, those of the predecessor body, the UN Commission on Human Rights,
2. poudarja pomen enakega obravnavanja socialnih, kulturnih, državljanskih in političnih pravic; poudarja, da so visoka stopnja brezposelnosti, večja revščina in socialna izključenost, čedalje težji dostop do cenovno ugodnih javnih storitev na področju zdravstva, izobraževanja, stanovanj, prevoza in kulture ter poslabšanje njihove kakovosti veliki izzivi; poudarja, da sta privatizacija in liberalizacija otežili dostop do nekaterih pravic, da je treba takšno naravnanost spremeniti in da so poglavitni načini za reševanje teh težav boljša porazdelitev bogastva, dostojne plače in kakovostna delovna mesta; ugotavlja tudi, da so se z varčevalnimi ukrepi, ki so bili uvedeni zlasti v nekaterih državah članicah Evropske unije, neenakosti samo še poglobile;
Underlines the importance of according equal attention to social, cultural, civil and political rights; emphasises that high unemployment rates, the increase in poverty and social exclusion, increasingly problematic access to affordable public services in the fields of health, education, housing, transport and culture, and the deteriorating quality of such services constitute major challenges; points out that privatisation and liberalisation have played a part in making some of these entitlements less accessible, that this trend needs to be reversed, and that better wealth distribution, decent wages and high-quality employment are important ways of solving these problems; notes, too, that the austerity plans which have been put in place, notably in various EU Member States, have merely aggravated inequalities;
8. poudarja pomen razprave o Slonokoščeni obali, kjer naj bi se razmere iz dneva v dan slabšale; poziva Svet, naj o tem sproži razpravo v Varnostnem svetu, da bi lahko načrtovali dodatne ukrepe za razrešitev razmer, ki terjajo vedno večji davek med prebivalci te države, tudi njihova življenja;
Emphasises the importance of the debate about Côte d’Ivoire, where the situation appears to be deteriorating from day to day; asks the UNHRC to raise the matter in the UN Security Council so that additional measures can be considered for breaking the current deadlock, which is taking an increasingly heavy toll on the people of the country, including in terms of lives;
10. poudarja pomen vprašanja zasedenih ozemelj, ki je uvrščeno na dnevni red 16. zasedanja Sveta za človekove pravice; močno spodbuja delegacijo Unije, naj obsodi vse vrste kolonializma, zlasti v Palestini, pa tudi v Zahodni Sahari;
Emphasises the importance of the question of the occupied territories, which is on the agenda for the 16th session of the UNHRC; urges the EU delegation to condemn all forms of colonialism, notably in Palestine but also in Western Sahara;
Unijo in njene države članice tudi poziva, naj obsodijo, da je Nato z zasedbo Afganistana še poslabšal razmere na področju človekovih pravic v tej državi, ter zahtevajo umik vseh vojaških enot iz nje; poziva Svet za človekove pravice, naj si prizadeva za ustanovitev preiskovalne komisije pod okriljem OZN ter za začetek procesa o vojnih zločinih, grozotah in ubojih civilistov v Iraku in Afganistanu;
Invites the EU and its Member States, likewise, to denounce the fact that NATO’s occupation of Afghanistan has further eroded human rights there, and to call for the withdrawal of troops from that country; calls on the UNHRC to work for the establishment of a committee of inquiry under UN auspices and for the initiation of legal proceedings in respect of the war crimes, atrocities and murders of civilians perpetrated in Iraq and Afghanistan;
15. poziva k novemu posebnemu mandatu za Demokratično republiko Kongo in Kolumbijo glede na vse slabše humanitarne razmere v teh državah, zlasti kar zadeva izginotja novinarjev in zagovornikov človekovih pravic; podpira kolumbijsko ljudstvo v njegovem prizadevanju za končanje oboroženih spopadov s političnimi pogajanji, ki bo omogočilo vzpostavitev trajnega miru v državi;
Calls for new country-specific mandates in respect of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Colombia, given the worsening humanitarian situation in those countries, particularly in relation to the disappearances of journalists and human rights defenders; supports the people of Colombia in their effort to end the armed conflict there through peaceful, political negotiation so that a lasting peace can be established;
19. izraža zaskrbljenost, ker organi oblasti po vsem svetu v različnih oblikah in na različnih ravneh čedalje bolj ukrepajo proti zagovornikom človekovih pravic, aktivistom, organizacijam in institucijam za človekove pravice ter novinarjem;
Expresses concern about the increasing incidence of action – in different forms and at different levels all over the world – by public authorities against human rights defenders, activists, organisations and institutions, as well as journalists;
21. meni, da bi moral pregled ohraniti neodvisnost visoke komisarke Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, ohraniti in po možnosti okrepiti posebne postopke ter omogočiti, da bi lahko Svet za človekove pravice obravnaval kršitve človekovih pravic v resolucijah in mandatih za posamezne države; poudarja pomen enakega obravnavanja socialnih, kulturnih, državljanskih in političnih pravic;
Takes the position that the review should preserve the independence of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, retain and, if possible, strengthen the Special Procedures, and ensure that the UNHRC can address specific human rights violations through its country-specific resolutions and mandates; underlines the importance of according equal attention to social, cultural, civil and political rights;
o evropski strategiji za atlantsko regijo
on the European Strategy for the Atlantic Region
PE459.704v01-00 B7‑0165/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o evropski strategiji za atlantsko regijo
PE459.704v01-00 B7‑0165/2011 European Parliament resolution on the European Strategy for the Atlantic Region
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 14. junija 2010, v katerih je pozval Komisijo, naj do junija 2011 pripravi strategijo za atlantsko regijo,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Council of 14 June 2010, which called on the Commission to draw up a European strategy for the Atlantic region by June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je organizirala Komisija ob objavi sporočila o evropski strategiji za atlantsko regijo,
– having regard to the public consultation launched by the Commission, with a view to publishing a communication on a European strategy for the Atlantic region,
– ob upoštevanju strategije EU za regijo Baltskega morja in strategije EU za Podonavje,
– having regard to the EU strategy for the Baltic sea region and to the EU strategy for the Danube region,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov petega kohezijskega poročila,
– having regard to the conclusions of the 5th Cohesion Report,
A. ker je v 3. členu Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in Naslovu XVIII Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije teritorialna kohezija opredeljena kot cilj Evropske unije,
A. whereas Article 3 of the Treaty on the European Union and Title XVIII of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union set territorial cohesion as an objective of the European Union,
B. ker je na atlantski obali pet držav članic: Francija, Irska, Portugalska, Španija in Združeno kraljestvo,
B. whereas five EU Member States have Atlantic coasts: France, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom,
C. ker ima atlantska regija svoje posebnosti, natančneje:
C. whereas the Atlantic region has its own specific characteristics, namely:
– dinamično pomorsko območje (zahvaljujoč pomorskemu prometu, ribolovu, energiji morja itd.),
- a dynamic maritime area (thanks to maritime transport, fishing, marine energy, etc.),
– območje, katerega ranljivo okolje je treba ohraniti in ki trpi zaradi posledic podnebnih sprememb (obalna erozija, ekstremni vremenski pojavi),
- an area whose fragile environment must be preserved and which is subject to the consequences of climate change (coastal erosion, extreme climatic phenomena),
– odročno območje Evropske unije, ki je težko dostopno in slabo povezano in ki ima malo glavnih mestnih centrov,
- an outlying area within the European Union, with accessibility and connectivity problems and with a low number of major city centres,
D. ker te posebnosti odstopajo od smernic, ki presegajo nacionalne omejitve in je zanje treba najti politične rešitve na evropski ravni,
D. whereas these specific characteristics stem from guidelines that transcend national boundaries and for which political answers have to be found at European level,
1. poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej oblikuje strategijo EU za atlantsko regijo kot integrirano strategijo, ki bo reševala pomorska in ozemeljska vprašanja;
Asks the Commission to shape as soon as possible the EU strategy for the Atlantic region as an integrated strategy dealing with maritime and territorial issues;
7. poziva, naj se ta strategija dobro poveže z regionalno politiko EU in integrirano pomorsko politiko, ter meni, da bi morala tudi olajšati sinergije z drugimi politikami EU, kot so politika za vseevoropska prometna omrežja, skupna ribiška politika, podnebni in okoljski ukrepi, okvirni program za raziskave in razvoj, energetska politika itd.;
Calls for this strategy to be well-connected to EU regional policy and integrated maritime policy and is of the opinion that it should also facilitate synergies with other EU policies such as trans-European transport networks, the common fisheries policy, climate and environment actions, the research and development framework programme, the energy policy, etc.;
9. ponovno poudarja, da je pomembno izboljšati dostopnost atlantskih pomorskih regij in izboljšati pretok ljudi, blaga in storitev v teh regijah, da bi se izpolnili cilji notranjega trga in kohezijske politike, zlasti na področju razvoja ladijskega prometa na krajših razdaljah in glavnih pomorskih poteh;
Reiterates the importance of improving the accessibility in Atlantic maritime regions, and of increasing movement of persons, goods and services in these regions in order to achieve the aims of the internal market and the objective of cohesion policy, especially by the development of short sea shipping and the highways of the sea;
12. meni, da se bodo s to strategijo reševala naslednja vprašanja skupnega interesa: energija morja, okoljske in podnebne spremembe, tudi preventiva in boj proti onesnaževanju morja s strani ladij, prevoz in dostopnost, varnost, varovanje in nadzor, raziskave, inovacije, ustvarjalne industrije, kultura, prosti čas in turizem, pomorske storitve in usposabljanja, ter ribištvo in sektor morske hrane;
Is of the opinion that this strategy would address the following issues of common interest: marine energy, environment and climate change, including the prevention and fighting of marine pollution by ships, transport and accessibility, safety, security and surveillance, research, innovation, creative industries, culture, leisure and tourism, marine services and training, and fisheries and the seafood sector;
15. vztraja, da mora sodelovanje v tem okviru najprej temeljiti na potrebah zainteresiranih strani in zato meni, da je treba sporazumno določiti, katera politična vprašanja se bodo obravnavala;
Insists that cooperation within the framework of this strategy should first and foremost be based on the needs of the stakeholders concerned and is thus of the opinion that the political priorities addressed have to be decided through a consensus;
o aktualnih razmerah v Libiji
on the current situation in Libya
PE459.712v01-00 B7‑0169/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o aktualnih razmerah v Libiji
PE459.712v01-00 B7‑0169/2011 European Parliament resolution on the current situation in Libya
– ob upoštevanju pogajanj o podpisu okvirnega sporazuma o sodelovanju, ki trenutno potekajo med Libijo in Evropsko unijo,
– having regard to ongoing negotiations between Libya and the European Union on the signing of a framework agreement for cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju prejšnjih resolucij Evropskega parlamenta o Libiji,
– having regard to previous EP resolutions on Libya,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1970/2011,
– having regard to the UN Security Council resolution 1970/2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta z dne 28. februarja 2011,
– having regard to the Council decision from 28 February 2011,
– ob upoštevanju opustitve pogajanj o okvirnem sporazumu z 22. februarjem,
– having regard to the suspension of the Framework agreement negotiation from 22 February,
– ob upoštevanju nedavnih izjav visoke predstavnice Catherine Ashton in Komisije,
– having regard to recent statements made by High Representative Ashton and the Commission,