natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
6. priznava, da že obstaja omrežje ureditev in najboljših praks, ter meni, da utegne vsak nov posebni predpis EU destabilizirati sedanje omrežje ureditev in razvodeniti uveljavljeni pristop varnostnih analiz ter poudarja, da nova zakonodaja ne sme podvajati ali ogrožati obstoječih najboljših praks;
Acknowledges that a network of regimes and best practices already exists, and believes that a single new piece of specific EU legislation may risk destabilising the current network of regimes, moving them away from the proven safety case approach, and stresses that the new legislation must not seek to duplicate or compromise existing best practice;
Direktiva Sveta z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje (kakor je bila spremenjena); UL L 175, 05.07.85, str.
Council Directive of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (as amended); OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
9. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči veljavni regulativni okvir glede razgradnje obstoječe infrastrukture za vrtanje ter po potrebi z zakonodajo razjasni odgovornost operaterjev za varno odstranitev in finančno odgovornost za vso okoljsko škodo, ki je nastala zaradi razgradnje, ali škodo na vrtini, nastalo po razgradnji;
Calls on the Commission to examine the current regulatory framework regarding the decommissioning of existing drilling infrastructure, and to clarify, if necessary by way of legislation, the responsibility of operators for ensuring safe removal and liability for any environmental damage resulting from the decommissioning or from a drilling site after it has been decommissioned;
Direktiva Sveta 96/82/ES z dne 9. decembra 1996 o obvladovanju nevarnosti večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi; UL L 10, 14.01.1997, str.
Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances; OJ L 10, 14.1.1997, p.
13. in III
13. and III
Predlog direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obvladovanju nevarnosti večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi, KOM(2010)0781 . ), na zakonodajo za dejavnosti pridobivanja nafte in plina na morju; do takrat in v primeru, da Komisija ne bo predlagala takšne nove zakonodaje, jo poziva, naj ponovno pregleda svoj predlog za direktivo SEVESO III in razširi področje njene uporabe na naftne ploščadi in podvodne plinovode na morskem dnu in pod njim ter na vse faze iskanja nahajališč nafte in plina do opustitve vrtine; pozdravlja obrazložitveni memorandum glede revizije direktive SEVESO II, v katerem Komisija izjavlja, da bo preučila ustrezne načine za okrepitev okoljske zakonodaje;
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, COM(2010)781. ) to legislation aimed at offshore oil and gas activities; in the meantime, and in the event that the Commission does not propose such new specific legislation, calls on the Commission to re-examine its SEVESO III proposal in order to extend its scope to oil rigs and underwater pipelines located on/under the seabed to all phases of exploration for oil and gas reserves up until the decommissioning of the well; welcomes the Commission’s explanatory memorandum concerning the revision of the SEVESO II Directive , in which the Commission states that it will assess the appropriate way to strengthen environmental legislation;
Direktiva 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja); UL L 334, 17.12.2010, str.
Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control); OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p.
12. pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo ponovno pregledala Direktivo 92/91/EGS, in poziva k pristopu na osnovi skupnih standardov, da bi preprečili različno obravnavanje delavcev znotraj istega podjetja na različnih lokacijah črpanja plina in nafte; poziva k preglednemu, učinkovitemu in doslednemu naboru pravil, ki mora veljati za vse delavce, zaposlene v tem sektorju, ter k oceni učinkovitosti veljavne zakonodaje in možnosti za prihodnjo uskladitev zakonodaje;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission intends to review Directive 92/91/EEC, and calls for an approach based on common standards, in order to avoid disparities in treatment between workers within the same company, depending on their place of work; calls, furthermore, for a transparent, efficient, consistent set of rules applying to all employees working in the offshore sector, and for an assessment of both the effectiveness of existing legislation and the possibilities for future harmonisation of legislation;
18. poudarja, da so potrebni učinkoviti nadzorni sistemi inšpekcijskih organov, ki uporabljajo inovativne metode, kot so posebni pregledi delovnega časa ali reševalnih akcij, ter da mora obstajati možnost sankcij za kršitve v zvezi z zdravjem in varnostjo delavcev;
Emphasises the need for systems providing for effective checks by inspection bodies, using innovative methods such as specific audits of working time or rescue operations, and for the possibility of applying sanctions in the event of violations of worker health and safety;
21. poudarja, da vsaka morebitna širitev zakonodaje EU o proizvodih na opremo naprav na morju upoštevati, da so glede na hiter tehnološki napredek lahko preveč natančna določila kmalu odveč;
Points out that any potential extension of EU product legislation to equipment on offshore installations should acknowledge that, given the high rate of technological progress, overly prescriptive specifications can fast become redundant;
Preprečevanje, izmenjava informacij in najboljša praksa
Prevention, Exchange of information and best-practice
24. priznava, da so na različnih morskih območjih razmere različne, vendar meni, da bi po potrebi moralo potekati usklajevanje regionalnih pobud med forumi, kar bi zagotavljalo najboljše prakse na ravni EU; poudarja, da bi morala Komisija aktivno sodelovati v teh forumih;
Recognises the variety of conditions in different sea areas but believes there should be inter-fora coordination between regional initiatives, where appropriate, to ensure best practice at EU level; stresses that the Commission should play an active role within these fora;
27. poudarja varnostne prednosti programov za soudeležbo delovne sile; podpira tesne povezave in skupne pobude med industrijskimi panogami, delovno silo in nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi na področju zdravstva, varnosti in varstva okolja;
Underlines the safety benefits from workforce engagement programmes; advocates strong links, and joint initiatives, between industry, the workforce and national competent authorities in the field of health, safety and environmental protection;
31. poziva panogo, naj si prek svojih organizacij prizadeva za kulturo resnične varnosti, tako na morju kot v pisarniškem okolju; zato spodbuja redna usposabljanja vseh začasno in stalno zaposlenih delavcev ter delodajalcev;
Calls on the industry to commit to a true safety culture throughout their organisations, whether offshore or within an office environment; therefore promotes regular training programmes for all permanent and contract employees as well as employers;
34. pozdravlja programe mednarodne izmenjave in skupnega usposabljanja za osebje pristojnih nacionalnih organov ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj jih spodbujajo s predlogi pobud;
Welcomes international exchange and common training programmes for the staff of competent national authorities and asks the Commission and the Member States to propose initiatives to encourage them;
37. meni, da bi morala biti delavcem, ki opravljajo dejavnosti na področju pridobivanja nafte in plina na morju, zagotovljena posebna zdravniška oskrba in spremljanje; priporoča zdravniške preglede fizičnega in psihičnega stanja delavcev najmanj enkrat letno;
Calls for the provision of regular, specific medical follow-up care for workers exercising their activities within the offshore oil and gas sector; recommends that a medical examination covering workers’ physical and psychological health should be carried out at least once a year;
44. se zaveda razlike med dovoljenjem in soglasjem za vrtanje, in ugotavlja, da imetnik dovoljenja ni nujno izvajalec vrtanja; meni, da bi moral biti med podelitvijo dovoljenja in začetkom vrtanja „regulativni premor“;
Notes the difference between licensing and consenting to drill and that the licensee may not be the drilling organisation; believes there should be regulatory 'hold points' after award of a licence and prior to drilling;
48. zagovarja poseben načrt izrednih ukrepov za vsako lokacijo posebej, v katerem bi morala biti ob vrtalnih načrtih za morebitne rezervne vrtine opredeljena tveganja, ocenjeni morebitni viri in posledice onesnaženja ter začrtana odzivna strategija; priporoča, naj izvajalci za pridobitev dovoljenja izvedejo okoljsko oceno vpliva in predložijo načrt izrednih ukrepov vsaj dva meseca pred začetkom izvajanja del; če gre za zapletene vrtine ali težavne razmere za vrtanje, pa je treba načrt izrednih ukrepov oceniti, se o njem posvetovati in ga odobriti še z drugimi procesi regulativnega potrjevanja (na primer tistimi v zvezi z vplivi na okolje ali zasnovo vrtin); meni, da se izvajanje del nikakor ne sme začeti, dokler načrt izrednih ukrepov ni potrjen s strani države članice, v kateri se bo izvajalo delo; vztraja, da ga mora nacionalni pristojni organ ob ustreznem varstvu podatkov objaviti;
Advocates the use of site-specific contingency plans that identify hazards, assess potential pollution sources and effects, outline a response strategy and outline drilling plans for potential relief wells; recommends that operators who obtain a licence should, as a condition for obtaining it, conduct an environmental impact assessment and submit their contingency plans at least two months before the start of operations; for complex wells, or challenging drill conditions, the contingency plan should be assessed, consulted and approved contemporaneously with other regulatory approval processes (e.g. those related to environmental impacts or well design); in all cases, operations must not commence until a contingency plan has been approved by the Member State in which they are to be conducted; contingency plans should be published by the national competent authority with due regard for data protection;
51. predlaga, da bi morala Evropska agencija za pomorsko varnost v svojih seznamih zajeti vse zadevne javne in panožne vire, da bi lahko najbolje izvajala usklajevanje v primeru večjega nepredvidenega izrednega dogodka;
Suggests that EMSA's inventories of response resources should collate all relevant public and industry resources so that EMSA is well placed to provide a coordinating role, where necessary, in the event of a major incident;
55. zagovarja strog nadzor ter nadaljnje preskušanje in ocenjevanje okoljskega vpliva kemičnih disperzijskih sredstev (in načrtov kriznega odzivanja, ki vključujejo uporabo kemičnih disperzijskih sredstev), da bi zagotovili njihovo trajnost v primeru razlitja in preprečili posledice za javno zdravje in okolje; poziva Komisijo, naj da podrobneje preučiti vplive tovrstnih kemikalij, po potrebi tudi prek raziskovalnih programov EU;
Advocates strict control and continued testing and assessment of the environmental impact of chemical dispersants (and emergency response plans involving the use of chemical dispersants) both to ensure their suitability in the event of a spill and to avoid public health and environmental implications; calls for the Commission to provide for more detailed research into the impacts of such chemicals through EU research programmes if necessary;
Odzivanje na nesreče
Disaster response
(a) vsa plovila ne morejo delovati v okoljih s plameniščem pod 60º;
(a) not all vessels can work in atmospheres with a flashpoint below 60º;
(b) pogodbe je treba izboljšati, da bodo omogočale daljše ukrepanje po razlitju nafte;
(b) contracts need to be improved to allow longer oil recovery operations;
(c) zapolniti je treba vrzeli v trenutni mreži;
(c) gaps in the current network need to be covered;
64. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej pripravi predloge za ustanovitev evropske enote civilne zaščite, osnovane na evropskem mehanizmu civilne zaščite, in naj skupaj z državami članicami razvije akcijski načrt, v katerem bi bili zajeti posebni mehanizmi, ki bi EU omogočili spoprijemanje s hudim onesnaženjem zaradi naftnih ploščadi na morju, vključno s podvodnimi naftovodi in plinovodi na morskem dnu ali pod njim;
Reiterates its calls to the Commission to bring forward proposals as soon as possible for establishing an EU Civil Protection Force based on the EU Civil Protection Mechanism and to draw up a European action plan, together with the Member States, that integrates specific mechanisms setting out how the EU can respond to massive pollution caused by oil offshore installations including underwater oil/gas pipelines located on/under the seabed;
66. podpira inovativne storitve, usmerjene v pomorski sektor; pozdravlja razpravo med Komisijo in državami članicami o novi pobudi za e-pomorstvo, ki gradi na projektu SafeSeaNet, ter meni, da bi lahko še dodatno izboljšala varnost pri pridobivanju nafte in plina na morju;
Supports innovative services directed towards the maritime sector; welcomes the discussion by the Commission and the Member States on a new e-maritime initiative building on the SafeSeaNet project and believes it could offer further safety benefits to the offshore oil and gas industry;
Sporočilo Komisije z naslovom „Znanje o morju 2020 – opazovanje in podatki o morju za pametno in trajnostno rast“ (KOM 2010)0461. in v predlogu uredbe o ustanovitvi programa za podporo nadaljnjemu razvoju integrirane pomorske politike
Commission Communication entitled "Marine Knowledge 2020", marine data for smart and sustainable growth (COM 2010)0461. and the proposed Regulation establishing a Programme to support the further development of an Integrated Maritime Policy
KOM(2010)0494 . , upoštevano, da je treba zagotoviti ustrezno spremljanje nevarnosti onesnaževanja, zato da bi pravočasno opredelili, kako ustrezno ukrepati;
COM(2010)0494 . takes account of the need to guarantee appropriate monitoring of pollution threats in order to determine the appropriate course of action in a timely manner;
72. priznava zasluge skupnostnih skladov, kot je OPOL v Severnem morju, in poziva k ustanovitvi tovrstnih skladov na vseh morskih območjih EU; poziva, naj bo članstvo v teh skladih za izvajalce obvezno in naj se zagotovi pravna varnost in varnostni mehanizem za utrditev zaupanja držav članic, pomorskega sektorja, zlasti ribičev, in davkoplačevalcev;
Recognises the merit of communal funds such as OPOL in the North Sea and calls for such funds to be established in each EU sea area; calls for membership to be mandatory for operators and for legal certainty to be ensured so as to provide a safety-net mechanism designed to reassure the Member States, the maritime sector, in particular fishermen, and taxpayers;
Poročilo Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu na podlagi člena 14(2) Direktive 2004/35/ES o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode KOM(2010)0581 . , v katerem pravi, „da zaenkrat ni zadostne utemeljitve za uvedbo usklajenega sistema obveznega finančnega jamstva“; poziva Komisijo, naj s poročilom z ustreznimi predlogi za spremembo direktive o okoljski odgovornosti ne čaka do roka iz njenega člena 18(2);
Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of Article 14(2) of Directive 2004/35/CE on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage COM(2010)581. concluding "that there is not sufficient justification at the present time for introducing a harmonised system of mandatory financial security"; urges the Commission not to wait for the deadline set under Article 18(2) of the Environmental Liability Directive to submit a report, which shall include any appropriate proposals to modify the directive;
Direktiva 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode; UL L 143, 30.4.2004, str.
Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage; OJL 143, 30.4.2004, p.
56. , tako da bi strogo uveljavljali načelo onesnaževalec plača in da bi povzročitelji strogo odgovarjali za vso škodo, ki jo povzročijo morskim vodam in biotski raznovrstnosti, tako da bi morale naftne družbe odgovarjati za kakršno koli in vso škodo, ki jo povzročijo, in bi prevzele popolno odgovornost za morebitno škodo brez zgornje meje, kar bi krile z rezervami gospodarskih subjektov;
56. should be extended so that the "polluter pays" principle and strict liability apply to all damage caused to marine waters and biodiversity, so that oil and gas companies can be held accountable for any and all environmental damage they cause, and can assume full liability, without any upper limit, for potential damage, secured by reserves held by the operators;
Direktiva 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji) (UL L 164, 25.6.2008, str.
Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p.
79. meni, da bi morala Komisija preveriti, ali bi bilo mogoče v okviru okoljske odgovornosti oblikovati odškodninski sklad za primere izlitja nafte, ki bi vseboval zavezujoče določbe o finančni varnosti;
Takes the view that the Commission should examine whether a compensation fund for oil disasters can be created within the framework of environmental liability, which would contain binding financial security provisions;
Odnosi s tretjimi državami
Relationship with third countries
Domače zaloge nafte in plina pomembno prispevajo h kritju energetske potrošnje v EU in k zanesljivi oskrbi z energijo.
Indigenous supplies of oil and gas provide an important contribution to the EU’s energy consumption and energy security.
V EU je več kot 90 % nafte in 60 % plina pridobljenega na odprtem morju.
In the EU over 90% of oil, and 60% of gas, is produced via offshore operations.
Te dejavnosti niso enakomerno razporejene po vsej EU: večina jih je na Severnem morju.
Activity is not uniformly distributed across the EU and the large majority of operations take place in the North Sea.
V EU samo dve držav članici pridobita okoli 80 % vse surove nafte
Within the EU, two Member States alone account for about 80% of crude oil production
Združeno kraljestvo in Danska , Norveška pa proizvede več kot vsa EU-27.
UK & DK whilst Norway produces more than the entire EU27.
Vsa nafta in plin, ki se pridobivata v evropskih vodah, nista v pristojnosti EU.
Not all offshore oil and gas activity in European waters occurs in EU-controlled waters.
V Sredozemlju je na primer veliko dejavnosti ob obalah severne Afrike, zlasti ob egiptovski in libijski.
In the Mediterranean Sea, for example, there is significant exploration activity off the coast of North Africa, particularly off Egypt and Libya.
Katastrofa na ploščadi Deepwater Horizon je vse, ki se ukvarjajo z raziskovanjem in izkoriščanjem nafte in plina na odprtem morju, spodbodla k ponovni preučitvi varnosti v tej dejavnosti.
The Deepwater Horizon disaster prompted all those involved in the exploration and extraction of offshore oil and gas to reassess the safety of their industry.
Državna komisija za razlitje na ploščadi Deepwater Horizon in za vrtanje na odprtem morju je med drugim podala vrsto priporočil, od katerih se številna že izvajajo.
The National Commission on the BP Deepwater horizon spill and Offshore drilling , among others, made a series of recommendations, many of which have been implemented already.
Posledice za Evropo so manj jasne: številna priporočila za ameriški sistem odražajo prakse, ki se ponekod v EU uporabljajo že dvajset let ali dlje.
The implications for Europe are less clear; many of the recommendations for the U.S regime reflect practices that have been prevalent in parts of the E.U. for 20 years or more.
V Severnem morju nekatere starejše panoge delujejo na pogosto dobro razvitih poljih pod nadzorom zrelih in razvijajočih se regulativnih sistemov.
Europe has, in the North Sea, mature industries operating in often well-developed fields, under the oversight of mature and evolving regulatory regimes.
Eno od prvih priporočil iz poročila omenjene komisije je:
One of the first recommendations in the National Commission’s report reads:
Predpisovalni sistemi načeloma delujejo na odziv in niso zmožni spodbujati nenehnega napredka v politikah in praksah, ki so potrebne za sledenje razvoju, saj razvijajoča se industrija išče vse redkejše in vse težje dostopne zaloge ogljikovodikov.
Prescriptive regimes are fundamentally reactive, unable to drive the continuous improvement in policies and practices necessary to keep pace with an evolving industry chasing scarcer, and less accessible, hydrocarbon reserves.
Namesto tega je treba projekte ocenjevati glede na posebne lokalne okoljske in tehnične razmere.
Instead, projects must be assessed individually on the basis of site-specific environmental and technical conditions.
Na vrtinah, kjer se vrta pod visokim pritiskom in/ali visokimi temperaturami, je več nevarnosti kot na tistih, kjer je za črpanje nafte potreben pritisk.
HPHT wells pose different risks to those where pressure needs to be introduced to extract oil.
Vodne globine gotovo vplivajo na tehnične izzive glede vrtanja in na prizadevanja za odzivanje na onesnaženje, vendar vse globine niso nevarne, pa tudi vse plitvejše vode niso nujno varne.
Whilst water depth certainly influences the technical challenge of drilling and pollution-response efforts, not all ’deepwater’ is dangerous and not all ’shallow-seas’ are safe.
Pristop z varnostno analizo je pristop na podlagi tveganja za vsako lokacijo posebej, tako da morajo izvajalci izkazati zadevnim nacionalnim zdravstvenim, varnostnim in okoljskim organom, da so bila upoštevana vsa tveganja in uporabljene vse kontrole.
The ’safety case’ is a risk-based, site-specific approach which requires operators to demonstrate to the relevant national health, safety and environmental authorities that all risks have been considered and controls implemented.
Za vsa ostala tveganja velja načelo najmanjše izvedljive mere.
Any residual risks should correspond to the ALARP principle.
“Regulativni premor“ pred začetkom vrtanja bo zagotavljal, da dejavnosti ne bodo kar samoumevne in se ne smejo začeti, preden se ne preverijo in odpravijo vsa tveganja.
Regulatory ’hold-points’ prior to drilling ensure that activity is not automatic but that operations cannot commence until risks have been considered and mitigated.
Novi predlogi ne bi smeli zmanjševati učinkovitosti tovrstnih regulativnih standardov, ki v državah članicah že veljajo, temveč morajo biti namenjeni razširjanju najboljše prakse na vse vode EU in strogemu izvajanju.
Any new proposal must not diminish the effectiveness of such regulatory standards already in place in Member States, but rather look to extend best-practice to all EU waters, whilst ensuring it is rigorously implemented.
V ZDA je za izdajo dovoljenj, zdravstvene in varnostne funkcije zadolžena ista agencija.
In the U.S. licensing and health and safety functions were consolidated in a single agency.
Zaradi tega prihaja do notranjih napetosti, cilji se mešajo, agencija pa je dovzetna za zunanje vplive.
This led to internal tensions, a confusion of goals and made it susceptible to outside influence.
Zato je priporočljivo, da bi države članice ločile proces izdajanja dovoljenj od zdravstvenih in varnostnih vprašanj.
It is therefore advisable that Member States separate the licensing process from health and safety issues.