natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je soodvisnost v območju eura večja kot v EU kot celoti in ker se to še ne izraža v učinkovitem in skladnem političnem procesu;
whereas the interdependence within the euro area is stronger than in the EU as a whole, and whereas this does not yet translate into effective and coherent policy processes;
ker povečana stopnja zaposlenosti sama po sebi še ni dovolj za odpravo revščine in socialne izključenosti, temveč je treba zagotoviti tudi varnost zaposlitev, dobre delovne razmere, dostojne plače in minimalne standarde socialnega varstva;
whereas increased levels of employment are not in themselves sufficient to tackle poverty and social exclusion unless they are accompanied by job security, good working conditions, a living wage, and minimum social standards;
ker je revizija sredstev za uresničevanje lizbonske strategije priložnost za prilagoditev integriranih smernic, da bodo bolje zrcalile nove izzive ter odpravljale pomanjkljivosti in neskladja med trenutnimi zavezami,
whereas the opportunity to review the Lisbon tool kit should be used to revamp the Integrated Guidelines in order to reflect new challenges and deal with deficiencies and the lack of coherence between the current commitments,
ker evropska strategija zaposlovanja potrebuje večjo prepoznavnost, zmožnost spremljanja in več spodbud k sodelovanju v skladu s prenovljenimi integriranimi smernicami, zlasti v nacionalnih reformnih programih in poročilih o njihovem izvajanju,
whereas the European Employment Strategy (EES) needs more visibility, monitoring capacity and participatory impetus under the revised Integrated Guidelines, in particular in the National Reform Programmes (NRP) and the NRP implementation reports,
ker poročila o izvajanju nacionalnih reformnih programov kažejo, da je uresničevanje politike najšibkejše pri zmanjševanju negotovosti zaposlitve ter povečevanju naložb v izobraževanje in usposabljanje,
whereas implementation reports on the NRPs show that the sectors in which policy implementation is weakest are those of improving the situation of precarious employment and stepping up investment in education and training,
ker obstajajo tesne povezave med gospodarsko rastjo, zaposlovanjem, delom, bojem proti revščini in socialno vključenostjo; ker revščina med zaposlenimi vse bolj izstopa kot ključni izziv za politiki zaposlovanja in socialne vključenosti; ker je zato nadvse pomembno znova uravnovesiti integrirane smernice, da se uresniči njihove socialne in okoljske cilje ter da se upošteva sinergije med različnimi področji;
whereas there is a strong interrelationship between economic growth, employment, the fight against poverty and social inclusion; whereas working poverty is increasingly highlighted as a key challenge in both employment and social inclusion policies; whereas it is therefore essential to re-balance the Integrated Guidelines to deliver on their social and environmental targets and consider the synergies between the different areas,
ker je bil na omenjenem neformalnem srečanju ministrov za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve v Guimarãesu sprejet sklep, da je socialna vključenost temeljna razsežnost strategij trajnostnega razvoja v Evropi, saj ponuja orodja, s katerimi se lahko ustvari priložnosti za vse, in ugodno učinkuje na zaposlovanje, znanje in veščine ter človekov razvoj,
whereas the above-mentioned informal meeting of Ministers for Employment and Social Affairs in Guimarães concluded that social inclusion is a fundamental dimension of sustainable development strategies in Europe as it provides the tools to create opportunities for all and has positive effects on employment, skills and human development,
ker številni ukrepi v procesu nacionalnih reformnih programov zelo očitno škodljivo vplivajo na politike socialne vključenosti, zlasti ukrepi za kakovostno in dobro plačano zaposlitev, medtem ko v tem procesu pogosto ni ciljev in politik socialne vključenosti,
whereas many measures in the National Reform Programme process have clear negative effects on social inclusion policies, especially measures targeting quality and well-paid employment, while social inclusion objectives and policies are still often absent in the National Reform Programme process,
poudarja, da bo lahko EU cilje trajnostnega razvoja na svojem območju dosegla le, če bo dejavna in enotna na svetovnem prizorišču; zato vztraja, da je treba opustiti pristop „svetovne Evrope“, ki si prizadeva za odpiranje in liberalizacijo trgov po vsem svetu; opozarja, da je treba razviti jasno zunanjo razsežnost politik EU, katere cilj bo spodbujanje korenitega prehoda k modelu trajnostnega svetovnega razvoja; meni, da mora celovit zunanjepolitični pristop, usmerjen v pošteno sodelovanje, predvideti program pravične trgovine za sodelovanje in trajnostni razvoj;
Stresses that the EU can only achieve its objective of sustainable development internally by being active and united on the global stage; insists therefore that the current 'Global Europe' approach pushing for market opening and liberalisation worldwide must be abandoned; emphasises the need to develop a coherent external dimension of EU policies promoting a fundamental transition towards a model of sustainable global development; considers that a comprehensive external policy approach focusing on fair cooperation has to embark on a fair trade agenda for cooperation and sustainable development;
poudarja čedalje večjo vlogo EU kot svetovnega akterja in enega največjih koristnikov odprtega svetovnega gospodarstva, največjega svetovnega izvoznika in uvoznika blaga, največjega svetovnega izvoznika storitev, drugega največjega namembnega kraja in izvora neposrednih tujih vlaganj; meni, da ima kot taka veliko odgovornost pri reševanju svetovnih vprašanj in pri oblikovanju skupnih orodij zunanje ekonomske politike, s katerimi bo ustrezno spodbujala trajnostni okoljski, družbeni in gospodarski razvoj;
Emphasises the emerging importance of the EU as a global player and one of the major beneficiaries of the open world economy, as the world's larger exporter and importer of goods, the world's largest exporter of services the second largest destination and origin of Foreign Direct Investment; considers that, as such, it has a strong responsibility to tackle global issues and create common foreign economic policy tools to adequately promote environmentally, socially and economically sustainable development;
poudarja, da je EU v letu 2006 z 8-odstotno rastjo izvoza še utrdila svojo vlogo največjega svetovnega izvoznika, vendar opozarja na dejstvo, da zunanjetrgovinski presežek prispeva le 0,3 odstotne točke k trenutni rasti BDP v območju eura;
Points out that in 2006 the EU expanded its leading role as a world champion exporter, with an 8 % growth in exports, but underlines the fact that the export surplus only accounts for about 0.3 percentage points of the current GDP growth in the euro area;
ocenjuje, da rastoči zunanjetrgovinski presežek EU, tako pri izvozu blaga kot storitev, poglablja svetovna neskladja in da bi bilo treba zato z ukrepi obrzdati zunanjetrgovinska neravnovesja ter spodbuditi domače povpraševanje, zlasti v državah, kjer izvoz še posebej očitno presega uvoz; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da s povečevanjem zunanjetrgovinskega presežka ne bo mogoče rešiti osrednjih težav, s katerima se sooča EU – razlik v življenjskem standardu in množične brezposelnosti;
Considers that growing EU export surpluses in both goods and services are aggravating worldwide imbalances and that measures should therefore be taken to rein in foreign trade imbalances and boost domestic demand, especially in those countries with particularly large export surpluses; notes in this connection that neither of the central problems facing the EU - the disparities in living standards and mass unemployment - can be solved by increasing export surpluses;
ugotavlja, da so se stopnje davka od dobička podjetij v EU znižale precej bolj kot v drugih državah OECD; ocenjuje, da bi morale države članice, če želijo spodbuditi trajnostni razvoj in zaposlovanje, omejiti medsebojno davčno konkurenco, zmanjšati davčno breme zaposlenih in potrošnikov ter poskrbeti, da podjetja in tisti, ki ustvarjajo kapitalske dobičke, znova prispevajo več k financiranju javnih storitev in transferjev;
Notes that corporation tax rates have fallen more sharply in the EU than in other OECD countries; regards it as necessary, in order to foster sustainable development and employment, that Member States curb tax competition between them, reduce the tax burden on employees and consumers and ensure that businesses and those deriving income from capital once again make a greater contribution to financing public services and transfers;
obsoja poviševanje stopenj DDV v EU, saj učinkuje regresivno in zmanjšuje povpraševanje; države članice poziva, naj namesto tega bolj obdavčijo luksuzno blago; poudarja, da bi višji davki na premoženje prispevali k lažjemu obvladovanju javnih proračunov;
Criticises the upward trend of VAT rates in the EU, which has a regressive effect and reduces demand; calls instead on Member States for higher taxes to be imposed on luxury goods; stresses that higher taxes on wealth could help to bring public budgets under control;
se zavzema za manj strogo monetarno politiko Evropske centralne banke in reformo te institucije, temelječo na demokratični odgovornosti, političnem nadzoru ter ekonomskih in socialnih vprašanjih; poudarja, da je precenjeni euro posledica naraščajočih neravnovesij v svetovnem gospodarstvu in zamirajočega notranjega povpraševanja v EU, kar kaže, da je potrebna celovita pobuda EU za politiko deviznih tečajev, da bo mogoče obvladovali menjalno razmerje eura z drugimi valutami, in sicer ameriškim dolarjem, jenom in kitajskim juanom;
Advocates a more relaxed monetary policy of the ECB and its institutional reform, based on democratic accountability, political control and economic and social concerns; emphasises that the appreciation in the euro exchange rate is the result of mounting imbalances in the global economy and sluggish internal demand in the EU, which identifies the need for an EU initiative at global level on exchange rate policy in order to control the Euro exchange rate vis à vis the US dollar, the yen and the Chinese renminbi;
odobrava namen Komisije, da v pogovorih s tretjimi državami še naprej razvija regulativno sodelovanje, približevanje standardov in enakovrednost pravil; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja dostojna delovna mesta in kakovost delovnega življenja, se bori proti socialnemu dampingu, sistematično uvede poglavje o trajnostnem razvoju v svoje trgovinske sporazume in sporazume o sodelovanju s tretjimi državami, zahteva ratifikacijo in izvajanje ključnih standardov Mednarodne organizacije dela in načel glede dostojnega dela ter pri sklepanju sporazumov s tretjimi državami sistematično upošteva socialne vrednote in načela;
Welcomes the Commission's intention further to develop regulatory cooperation, convergence of standards and equivalence of rules in its discussions with third countries; calls on the Commission to promote decent work and quality of working life, combat social dumping , systematically include a chapter on sustainable development in its trade and cooperation agreements with third countries, requiring ratification and enforcement of core International Labour Organisation standards and decent work principles, and systematically apply its social values and principles when concluding agreements with third countries;
izraža skrb zaradi vse bolj razširjene revščine v EU, ki se je v sredini 90. let prejšnjega stoletja sicer zmanjšala s 17 % na 15 %, vendar je v letu 2005 znova narasla na 17 %; v povezavi s tem ocenjuje kot nesprejemljivo, da dohodek približno 80 milijonov ljudi v EU s 27 državami članicami ne dosega 60 % mediane ekvivalentnega nacionalnega dohodka;
Expresses its concern about the constantly high level of poverty in the EU which, following a fall from 17% to 15% in the mid-1990s, has recently risen again to 17% in 2005; considers it as unacceptable in this connection that, in the EU-27, around 80 million people have a disposable income of below 60% of the national equalised median income;
dvomi o pristnosti izjave Komisije, da bo posvetila več pozornosti dejavni vključenosti in enakim možnostim, da je treba spodbujati primerno socialno zaščito in okrepiti boj proti revščini ter da bo treba poiskati učinkovitejša sredstva za to, da bodo lahko državljani uveljavljali svoje pravice do kakovostne in dobro plačane zaposlitve, minimalnih socialnih standardov , izobraževanja, socialnih storitev, zdravstvenega varstva in drugih oblik socialne zaščite v Evropi;
Doubts the genuineness of the Commission's statement that more attention will be given to active inclusion and equal opportunities, that adequate social protection should be promoted and the fight against poverty reinforced and that we will need more effective means of ensuring citizens' existing rights of access to quality and well-paid employment, minimum social standards , education, social services, health care and other forms of social protection across Europe;
opozarja, da je treba v naslednjem ciklu integriranih smernic dejansko upoštevati socialno razsežnost; ocenjuje, da je treba nujno preseči sedanje neravnovesje v smernicah za zaposlovanje, zaradi katerega niso upoštevani nekateri osnovni socialni cilji, na primer zmanjšanje števila revnih delavcev in večja razpoložljivost kakovostnih delovnih mest, izobraževanja ter zdravstvenega in drugih oblik socialnega varstva za vse; poziva Komisijo, naj prilagodi integrirane smernice in s tem ustrezno odgovori na nove izzive ter odpravi omenjene pomanjkljivosti;
Stresses the need to ensure a genuine commitment to the social dimension in the next cycle of the Integrated Guidelines; considers that there is an urgent need to overcome the existing imbalance in the Employment Guidelines, which fails to give weight to certain basic social objectives, such as those that aim to reduce the number of working poor and increase access to high-quality employment, education, health care and other forms of social protection for all; calls on the Commission to adapt the Integrated Guidelines in order to face up to the new challenges and overcome those shortcomings;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sistematično zagotavljajo učinkovito usklajevanje med procesom nacionalnih reformnih programov za rast in za številnejša in boljša delovna mesta na eni strani ter procesom socialne zaščite in vključenosti in evropske strategije za trajnost na drugi strani;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to adopt a systematic approach ensuring effective coherence between the NRP process on growth and more and better jobs on the one hand and the social protection/social inclusion process and the European Sustainability Strategy on the other;
Obeti za nov model trajnostnega razvoja Evrope
Perspectives for a new model of sustainable development for Europe
meni, da je potreben prelom s sedanjimi politikami EU, če želimo res rešiti vprašanja trajnostnega razvoja, nezaposlenosti, revščine, socialnega izključevanja in razlik (v dohodkih); poudarja, da je treba lizbonsko strategijo nadomestiti z novo celovito strategijo za trajnost in solidarnost;
Considers that a break is needed with current EU polices if we wish effectively to address the problems of sustainable development, unemployment, poverty, social exclusion and (income) inequalities; stresses that a new integrated strategy for sustainability and solidarity is needed to replace the current Lisbon Strategy;
ocenjuje, da bi morala ta celovita strategija za trajnost in solidarnost opredeliti novo razvojno pot za Evropo, pot polne zaposlenosti, dostojnih služb in plač, socialne in gospodarske kohezije ter socialne zaščite za vse, saj to zagotavlja najvišji življenjski standard; pot, ki upošteva razvojne potrebe vsake države članice, še zlasti manj razvitih, ki spodbuja dejansko zbliževanje in ki prispeva k zmanjšanju razvojnih razlik med državami članicami ter obstoječih gospodarskih, socialnih in regijskih neskladij;
Considers that such a new integrated strategy for sustainability and solidarity must focus on setting a new development path for Europe, a path of full employment, decent jobs, living wages, social and economic cohesion and social protection for all that guarantees the highest living standards, a path that pays heed to the development needs of each Member State, in particular the less developed, that promotes real convergence and helps reduce the development gap between Member States and existing economic, social and regional disparities;
poziva Komisijo, naj obravnava razhajanja pri izvajanju in učinkovitosti smernic za zaposlovanje v posameznih državah članicah, tako da zagotovi, da bodo države članice celoviteje uresničevale cilje evropske strategije za zaposlovanje in uporabljale njene kvalitativne kazalnike, instrumente vseživljenjskega učenja ter ukrepe, ki jih predvidevajo evropski pakt za mlade, evropski pakt za enakost med spoloma ter akcijski načrt Evropske unije 2006-2007 o invalidnosti; poziva, naj se vse te zaveze, cilji in merila v celoti vgradijo v integrirane smernice, da se izboljša usklajenost in učinkovitost evropske strategije za zaposlovanje;
Calls on the Commission to address the wide divergence among the Member States in implementation and effectiveness of the Employment Guidelines by ensuring that Member States more comprehensively apply the qualitative EES indicators and targets, lifelong learning instruments and measures set out in the European Youth Pact, the European Pact for Gender Equality and the EU Disability Action Plan 2006-2007; calls for all those commitments, targets and benchmarks to be fully incorporated in the Integrated Guidelines to improve the coherence and efficiency of the EES;
poudarja, da je zelo pomembno okrepiti strateško zmogljivost politike zaposlovanja; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pri procesih usklajevanja posebno pozornost posvetijo kakovosti delovnih mest, ustreznemu plačilu za vse zaposlene, usklajevanju med delom, družino in zasebnim življenjem, kakovosti in dostopnosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja za vse, izvajanju protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje, krepitvi politike enakih možnosti za oba spola ter vprašanjem priseljevanja;
Underlines the great importance of enhancing the strategic capacities of employment policies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to pay particular attention in their coordination processes to the quality of jobs, good wages for all employees, the reconciliation of work, family and personal life, the quality and availability of education and training for all, the implementation of anti-discrimination legislation, the strengthening of equal opportunity policies for women and men, and immigration issues;
zavrača načelo varne prožnosti, ki ga je predlagala Komisija; predlaga, da Evropski svet decembra 2007 sprejme bolj uravnotežena načela za naslednji triletni cikel evropske strategije za zaposlovanje ter integriranih smernic za rast in delovna mesta, in sicer naj jih utemelji na spodbujanju „kakovostnega dela“, ustvarjanju kakovostnih delovnih mest, visoki ravni socialne zaščite, odpravi segmentacije trga dela z zagotavljanjem enakih pravic za vse delavce, vključno s tistimi iz držav nečlanic EU, in s postopnim odpravljanjem negotovih oblik zaposlovanja;
Rejects the flexicurity approach proposed by the Commission; proposes that the European Council in December 2007 adopt a more balanced set of principles for the next three-year cycle of the European Employment Strategy and the Integrated Guidelines on Growth and Jobs, based on the promotion of 'good work', the creation of quality employment, a high level of social protection and the breakdown of labour market segmentation by ensuring equal rights for all workers, including workers from non-EU countries , and by phasing out precarious employment;
ugotavlja, da so državljani EU v skrbeh, ker konkurenca, ki jo povzroča širitev, integracija in delovna mobilnost tradicionalne delovne vzorce spreminjajo v modele varne prožnosti, in je prepričan, da bi bilo treba njihove skrbi pomiriti s političnimi ukrepi za povečevanje ponudbe in izboljšanje kakovosti tistih javnih dobrin in storitev, ki sčasoma lahko pripomorejo k povečanju produktivnosti in spodbujajo aktivne politike trga dela;
Notes that EU citizens are worried that enhanced competition driven by enlargement, integration and labour mobility shifts traditional working patterns to flexicurity models and believes that these worries should be addressed through policy actions expanding the supply and improving the quality of those public goods and services that, over time, can help to augment productivity growth and active labour market policies;
meni, da je eden od temeljnih problemov, s katerim se srečuje evropsko gospodarstvo v zadnjih letih, nezadostno domače povpraševanje;
Points out that one of the fundamental problems facing the European economy in recent years has been insufficient domestic demand;
poudarja, da obstajajo velike razlike med stopnjami rasti v posameznih državah, in izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi razmeroma nizke rasti v mnogih večjih državah članicah EU, ki jo je mogoče pripisati predvsem zastajajočemu notranjemu povpraševanju; v zvezi s tem opominja na nadpovprečno stopnjo rasti v skandinavskih državah, ki jim je nedavno uspelo občutno zmanjšati tudi brezposelnost;
Points out that there are wide disparities between the growth rates of the individual countries and expresses concern at the relatively low growth rate in a number of the large EU Member States, which is primarily attributable to the stagnant internal demand; notes in this context the above-average growth rate enjoyed by the Scandinavian countries accompanied by a recent substantial reduction in unemployment;
poudarja, da obstajajo pomembni učinki prelitja med gospodarstvi držav članic; v povezavi s tem poudarja, da je boljše usklajevanje gospodarske politike ključnega pomena;
Underlines that there are significant spill-over effects among Member States' economies; stresses in this context that improved economic policy coordination is of crucial importance;
meni, da bodo preglednost finančnega trga, učinkovita konkurenčna pravila ter ustrezna ureditev in nadzor še naprej ključnega pomena, če upoštevamo globalizacijo finančnih trgov in zagotavljanje pravic potrošnikov; je prepričan, da bi bilo treba za uspešen boj proti finančnim špekulacijam poostriti zahteve za preglednost, omejiti uporabo metod finančnega vzvoda, listinjenje in trgovanje s posojilnimi paketi pa dovoliti le, ko ga izrecno odobrijo nadzorni organi;
Is of the opinion that financial market transparency, effective competition rules and appropriate regulation and supervision will continue to be crucial, bearing in mind the globalisation of financial markets and the need to ensure consumer rights; considers that in order to combat financial speculation, transparency requirements should be raised, leverage limited and securitisation and trading of loan packages only permitted when explicitly approved by supervisory authorities;
priznava, da Evropa potrebuje celovitejšo pretvorbo inovacij v nove proizvode in storitve, ki spodbujajo trajnostni razvoj; zato podpira zahtevo Komisije za „trikotnik znanja“ – raziskave, izobraževanje in inovacije; pričakuje učinkovitejše vlaganje v nove veščine in znanje, vseživljenjsko učenje ter sodobne sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Acknowledges that Europe needs a more comprehensive transformation of innovation into new products and services promoting sustainable development; supports therefore the Commission's demand for a 'knowledge triangle' of research, education and innovation; expects more effective investments in new skills, lifelong learning and modern education/training systems;
ugotavlja, da bi morala strukturne politike dopolnjevati politika konkurence, ki bo opozarjala na možnosti nastanka kartelov in izpodrivanja malih podjetij;
Notes that competition policy should be complementary to structural policies, prevent the emergence of cartels and ensure that conditions do not make it possible to crowd out small business;