natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju EU-Rusija, ki je začel veljati leta 1997 in potekel leta 2007, a se še vedno uporablja do zaključka sedanjih pogajanj o novem sporazumu,
– having regard to the EU-Russia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, which entered into force in 1997 and expired in 2007, although still in force pending the conclusion of the ongoing negotiations on a new agreement,
– ob upoštevanju prejšnjih poročil in resolucij Evropskega parlamenta o Rusiji in odnosih med EU in Rusijo, zlasti resolucije o umorih zagovornikov človekovih pravic v Rusiji s septembra 2009 in resolucij o vrhunskih srečanjih EU-Rusija, predvsem z junija 2010 o vrhunskem srečanju v Rostovu na Donu,
– having regard to the European Parliament’s previous reports and resolutions on Russia and on EU-Russia relations, in particular the resolution on the murder of human rights activists in Russia adopted in September 2009 and the resolutions on EU-Russia Summits, in particular the one from June 2010 on the summit in Rostov-on-Don,
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o človekovih pravicah po svetu za leto 2009, sprejetega decembra 2010,
– having regard to its Annual Report on Human Rights in the World 2009, adopted in December 2010,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah med EU in Rusijo,
– having regard to the EU-Russia Consultations on Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju partnerstva za modernizacijo, ki se je začelo na vrhunskem srečanju EU-Rusija maja 2010 v Rostovu na Donu, in izražene zaveze ruskega vodstva pravni državi kot temeljni osnovi modernizacije v Rusiji,
– having regard to the Partnership for Modernisation, launched at the EU-Russia summit in May 2010 in Rostov-on-Don and the expressed commitment by the Russia leadership to the rule of law as a fundamental base for the modernisation of Russia,
– ob upoštevanju druge sodbe Mihailu Hodorkovskemu in Platonu Lebedjevu z dne 30. decembra 2010 z drugega sojenja v zvezi s premoženjem družbe Yukos in več izjav visoke predstavnice/podpredsednice Catherine Ashton, predsednika Evropskega parlamenta Jerzyja Buzeka in predsednika Evropske komisije Joséja Manuela Barrosa,
– having regard to the second judgement of Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev on 30 December 2010 in the second trial concerning Yukos assets and to the multiple statements by the High Representative/Vice President Catherine Ashton, by the President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek and by the President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso,
– ob upoštevanju aretacije Borisa Nemcova in okoli 70 drugih po demonstracijah opozicije dne 31. decembra 2010 v Moskvi,
– having regard to the arrest of Boris Nemtsov and approximately 70 other persons on 31 December 2010 in Moscow, following an opposition demonstration,
– ob upoštevanju terorističnega napada na letališče Domodedovo 24. januarja 2011, v katerem je bilo ubitih 35 oseb in ogromno ranjenih,
– having regard to the terrorist attack at Domodevodo airport on 24 January 2011, in which 35 persons were killed and many were injured,
A. ker je Evropska unija še vedno zavezana nadaljnjemu poglabljanju in razvijanju odnosov z Rusijo ter načelom, zapisanimi v partnerstvu za modernizacijo, na osnovi globoke zavezanosti demokratičnim načelom, spoštovanju temeljnih in človekovih pravic ter pravni državi,
A. whereas the European Union continues to be committed to further deepen and develop the relations between the European Union and Russia and to the principles enshrined in the Partnership for Modernisation, based on a deep commitment to democratic principles, respect for fundamental and human rights and the rule of law,
B. ker so zgoraj omenjene odmevne zadeve le primeri, ki so zunaj Rusije najbolj znani, kar pomeni sistemsko šibkost ruske države, da bi spoštovala pravno državo in državljanom zagotavljala pravičnost,
B. whereas the high profile cases cited above are just the most well-known cases outside Russia of what amounts to a systematic failure of the Russian state to uphold the rule of law and to deliver justice to its citizens,
C. ker so ruski ukrepi proti terorizmu vse prepogosto kritizirani kot nasilni in zatiralski,
C. whereas Russian measures against terrorism too often has been criticised for being brutal and oppressive,
5. obžaluje in obsoja aretacijo Borisa Nemcova in drugih dne 31. decembra 2010 po njihovi udeležbi na protestu "Strategija-31" ter njihov čas v priporu in obsodbe za kršenje javnega reda; poudarja, da morajo ruske oblasti podpreti in spoštovati svobodo zbiranja in pravico do mirnega protestiranja;
Regrets and condemns the arrest of Boris Nemtsov and others on 31 December 2010, following their participation in a so called ‘Strategy-31’ protest, and their time in detention and convictions for disturbing public order; underlines that Russian authorities must uphold and respect the freedom of assembly, and the right to conduct peaceful protests;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu nujno predloži oceno o tem, ali so sodni ukrepi proti različnim mednarodnim in domačim podjetjem in njihovemu vodstvu v Rusiji skladni z zahtevami za Rusijo v zvezi z njeno željo po polnopravnem članstvu v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji;
Calls on the Commission to urgently present to Parliament an evaluation on whether the judicial measures taken against several international and domestic companies and their executives in Russia are compatible with the requirements towards Russia as regards its ambition for full membership of the WTO;
12. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj Rusiji ponudita konkretno pomoč in strokovno znanje, da bi okrepila neodvisnost sodstva in organe pregona ter izboljšala odpornost pravosodnega sistema proti političnim in gospodarskim pritiskom; izraža pripravljenost, da bi prispeval k oblikovanju tovrstnih programov za podporo sodstvu ter k izobraževanju in usposabljanju osebja v službah pregona, tožilcev in sodnikov;
Calls on the Council and Commission to offer Russia concrete assistance and expertise in order to strengthen the independence of the judiciary and law enforcement agencies and improve the ability of the judicial system to withstand political and economic pressure; underlines the willingness to contribute to the set-up of such an judicial support programme and to contribute to the education and training of law enforcement personnel, prosecutors and judges;
PE459.643v02-00 B7‑0111/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pravni državi v Rusiji
PE459.643v02-00 B7‑0111/2011 European Parliament resolution on the rule of law in Russia
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Rusiji,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in Rusko federacijo, ki je začel veljati leta 1997 in je bil podaljšan do nadomestitve z novim sporazumom,
– having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Russian Federation, which entered into force in 1997 and has been extended pending its replacement by a new agreement,
– ob upoštevanju tekočih pogajanj za novi sporazum, ki bo zagotovil nov celostni okvir za odnose med EU in Rusijo,
– having regard to the ongoing negotiations for a new agreement providing a new comprehensive framework for EU-Russia relations,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Deklaracije Združenih narodov o zagovornikih človekovih pravic, Deklaracije ZN o pravicah in odgovornosti posameznikov, skupin in organov družbe za uveljavljanje in varstvo splošno priznanih človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders and the UN Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognised Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
B. ker je tudi predsednik ruskega ustavnega sodišča Valerij Zorkin omenil, da resnična pravna ozaveščenost in spoštovanje zakona še nista del splošno sprejetega sistema vrednot tudi med številnimi javnimi ustanovami, kjer se pogosto meni, da mora biti interes države in državnih podjetij po definiciji pred interesi običajnih državljanov;
B. whereas even Valerii Zorkin, President of the Russian Constitutional Court, noted that ‘true legal awareness and respect for the law has not yet become integrated into a generally accepted system of values even among many public offices who frequently believe that the interests of the state and of state owned enterprises should by definition prevail over the interests of ordinary citizens’,
C. ker številni odmevni primeri, kot je drugo sojenje Mihailu Hodorkovskemu in Platonu Lebedjevu, obravnave zoper direktorje in odvetnike HSBC/Hermitage, raziskava umora Ane Politkovske, pregon Jurija Samodurovega ter razrešitev sodnika Kudeškina in drugih, vzbujajo skrb glede slabšanja stanja pravne države v Rusiji,
C. whereas a number of high-profile cases, such as the second trial of M. Khodorkovsky and P. Lebedev, the proceedings against the managers and lawyers of HSBC/Hermitage, the investigation into the murder of A. Politkovskaya, the prosecution of Y. Samodurov and the dismissal of Judge Kudeshkina and several other judges, give rise to concerns about the deterioration of the rule of law in Russia,
D. ker je Svet Evrope kritiziral dejstvo, da so sodniki žrtve vse večjega pritiska, namenjenega zagotovitvi obsodb v skoraj vseh primerih, ki jih tožilstvo pripelje pred sodišče; ker so odvetniki še vedno žrtve preiskav in zaplemb ter drugih oblik pritiska, ki so v nasprotju z rusko zakonodajo in standardi Sveta Evrope;
D. whereas the Council of Europe criticised that judges are subjected to an increasing level of pressure aimed at ensuring convictions in almost all cases brought to court by the prosecutor’s office; whereas lawyers are still subjected to searches and seizures and other forms of pressure in violation of Russian law and Council of Europe standards,
E. ker skoraj 30 % primerov, ki čakajo na obravnavo v Evropskem sodišču za človekove pravice, zadeva Rusijo, kar je veliko več kot za katero koli drugo državo; ker je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice izreklo več kot 150 sodb, v katerih je Rusijo obtožilo hudih kršitev človekovih pravic v Čečeniji; ker Rusija še vedno plačuje zahtevano denarno odškodnino za žrtve, a ne izvaja ustrezno osrednjih delov sodb, zlasti kar zadeva opravljanje učinkovitih preiskav in kaznovanje storilcev;
E. whereas close to 30% of the cases currently awaiting attention by the European Court of Human Rights now concern Russia, far more than for any other country; whereas the European Court of Human Rights has issued more than 150 judgments holding Russia responsible for grave human rights violations in Chechnya; whereas Russia continues to pay the required monetary compensation to victims but fails to meaningfully implement the core of the judgments, in particular conducting effective investigations and holding perpetrators accountable,
F. ker je Rusija padla na 154. mesto (od 178) na seznamu držav organizacije Transparency International na področju zaznane korupcije javnih uradnikov (tudi policistov in sodnikov);
F. whereas Russia has fallen to 154th place (out of 178) in Transparency International’s ranking of countries in terms of the perceived corruption of their public officials (including police and judges),
G. ker so kljub večkratnim izjavam Kremlja o pomembnosti normalnih delovnih pogojev za nevladne organizacije zagovorniki človekovih pravic še vedno izpostavljeni nadlegovanju in napadom, zlasti tisti, ki si prizadevajo za konec nekaznovanosti na severnem Kavkazu;
G. whereas despite the Kremlin’s repeated statements about the importance of normal working conditions for NGOs, human rights defenders remain vulnerable to harassment and attacks, and those working to end impunity in the North Caucasus are especially at risk,
H. ker so nevladne organizacije in mediji še vedno ranljivi zaradi nenatančne protiekstremistične zakonodaje; ker so bile julija 2010 sprejete nove določbe zakona o zvezni varnostni službi, ki ji omogočajo izdajo opozoril posameznikom, organizacijam in medijskim hišam; ker opozorila od posameznikov ali organizacij zahtevajo prenehanje dejavnosti, za katere zvezna varnostna služba meni, da so dejansko ali potencialno ekstremistične;
H. whereas NGOs and the media remain vulnerable to vague anti-extremist legislation; whereas in July 2010, new provisions to the law on the Federal Security Service (FSB) were adopted allowing the FSB to issue warnings to individuals, organisations, and media outlets; whereas warnings require individuals or organisations to stop activities the FSB considers actually or potentially extremist,
I. ker je vse več primerov samovoljnega omejevanja pravice do svobode zbiranja, oblasti pa čedalje huje kaznujejo miroljubne demonstrante; ker je med letom 2010 policija še vedno, včasih tudi nasilno, razgnala javne shode v velikih mestih, ki so potekali na 31. dan vsakega meseca v podporo členu 31 ustave, ki zagotavlja svobodo zbiranja; ker se organizatorji demonstracij pogosto soočajo z nadlegovanjem in ustrahovanjem, ki ga izvajajo tudi uslužbenci organov pregona in člani provladnih organizacij;
I. whereas there is a growing number of instances of arbitrary restrictions of the right to freedom of assembly, and the increasingly harsh sentencing to which peaceful protesters are being subjected by the authorities; whereas throughout 2010, police continued to disperse, sometimes violently, the public rallies held in large cities on the thirty-first day of each month in support of Article 31 of the constitution, which guarantees freedom of assembly; whereas organisers of demonstrations often face harassment and intimidation, including from law enforcement officials and members of pro-government organisations,
2. ponovno poudarja, da morajo biti demokracija in človekove pravice bistvo novega celostnega okvirnega sporazuma z Rusko federacijo, zlasti glede opredelitve in vključitve učinkovite in operativne klavzule o človekovih pravicah;
Stresses once more that democracy and human rights must be at the core of the new comprehensive framework agreement with the Russian Federation, with regard, in particular, to the definition and inclusion of an effective and operational human rights clause;
4. poudarja, da je za pravno državo in zaščito svobode posameznika bistvenega pomena zavarovati kazenskopravne sisteme po vsej Evropi pred politično motiviranim vmešavanjem; je resno zaskrbljen zaradi primerov, pri katerih Rusija ni zagotovila tega načela; poudarja, da se sklicevanja na navedeno edinstvenost zgodovinske zapuščine države, sodne običaje ali tradicije vodenja ne morejo uporabiti kot izgovor za neupoštevanje ali celo kršenje mednarodnih pravnih in demokratičnih pravil, človekovih pravic in človeškega dostojanstva;
Stresses the fundamental importance, for the rule of law and the protection of individual freedom, of shielding criminal justice systems throughout Europe from politically motivated interferences; expresses its serious concern about the cases where Russia failed to guarantee this principle; underlines that no references to the stated uniqueness of the country’s historic legacy, judicial or governance traditions can be used as a pretext for ignoring or, even worse, abusing international legal and democratic norms, human rights and human dignity;
6. je zelo zaskrbljen ob ponovnem izbruhu nasilja in terorističnih dejanj v Ruski federaciji, zlasti na severnem Kavkazu; na eni strani poziva k zaustavitvi terorističnih dejanj, na drugi strani pa poziva ruske oblasti, naj naredijo konec splošno razširjenemu ozračju nekaznovanja kršitev človekovih pravic in nespoštovanja pravne države v tej regiji;
Expresses its deepest concern at the resurgence of violence and acts of terrorism in the Russian Federation, and especially in the North Caucasus; calls, on the one hand, for an end to such terrorist acts and, on the other hand, on the Russian authorities to put an end to the widespread climate of impunity for human rights violation and the absence of the rule of law in that region;
10. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, vladi in parlamentu Ruske federacije, OVSE ter Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the parliaments and governments of the Member States, the Government and Parliament of the Russian Federation, the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
9.2.2011 B7-0112/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
9.2.2011 B7-0112/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE459.644v01-00 B7‑0112/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zakonu o medijih na Madžarskem
PE459.644v01-00 B7‑0112/2011 European Parliament resolution on Media Law in Hungary
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji Zlasti člena 2 PEU in členov v zvezi s spoštovanjem, spodbujanjem in varstvom temeljnih pravic, ter členov 11, 25, 49, 56, 103, 107, 114 in 167 Pogodbe ES.
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union in particular its Article 2 TEU and those relating to respect for, and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, and to Articles 11, 25, 49, 56, 103, 107, 114 and 167 of the EC Treaty.
, Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah Zlasti člena 11.
, the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in particular Article 11.
in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah Zlasti člena 10.
and the European Convention on Human Rights in particular Article 10.
, zlasti členov o spoštovanju, spodbujanju in varstvu temeljnih pravic ter svobodi izražanja in obveščanja, posebej pravici do pluralizma medijev,
, and notably their articles related to the respect, the promotion and protection of fundamental rights and of the freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism in particular,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o pluralizmu medijev v državah članicah EU ( SEC(2007)0032 ), pristopa k pluralizmu medijev v treh korakih, kot ga opredeljuje Komisija, ter neodvisne študije, ki je bila izvedena za Komisijo in dokončana leta 2009,
– having regard to the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ), the 'three-step approach to media pluralism' defined by the Commission and to the independent study carried out on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji ter 22. aprila 2004 o nevarnosti kršitve svobode izražanja in obveščanja v Evropski uniji in predvsem v Italiji,
– having regard to its resolutions of 25 September 2008 concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union, of 22 April 2004 on the risks of violation in the European Union and particularly in Italy of freedom of expression and information,
A. ker Evropska unija temelji na vrednotah, določenih v členu 2 PEU, ter priznava pravno vrednost pravic, svoboščin in načel, opredeljenih v Listini temeljnih pravic, s pristopom k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah pa zlasti tistih iz člena 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ki jamči svobodo in pluralizem medijev, svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je zapisano v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravicah in členu 10 Evropske konvencije za človekove pravice, ki ščitita svobodo in pluralizem medijev, svobodo izražanja ter svobodo prejemanja in posredovanja informacij brez vmešavanja ali pritiska javnih oblasti,
A. whereas European Union is founded on the values stipulated in Article 2 of TEU and recognises the legal value of the rights, freedoms and principles as set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, and through accession into the European Convention on Human rights, specifically those as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, safeguarding the freedom and pluralism of media, freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without interference or pressure from public authorities,
B. ker pluralizem in svoboda medijev še vedno povzročata hudo zaskrbljenost v EU in njenih državah članicah, kot je bilo poudarjeno v nedavnih kritikah med junijem in decembrom 2010 uvedenega zakona o medijih na Madžarskem, ki so jih izrazile mednarodne organizacije, kot so OVSE in komisar Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, številna mednarodna in nacionalna združenja novinarjev, urednikov in publicistov, nevladne organizacije s področja človekovih pravic in državljanskih svoboščin, pa tudi države članice in Evropska komisija,
B. whereas media pluralism and freedom continues to be a grave concern in the EU and its Member States, as highlighted by the recent criticism of the media laws in Hungary introduced between June and December 2010, as expressed by international organisations, such as OSCE and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, high number of international and national professional organisations of journalists, editors and publishers, human rights and civil liberties NGOs, as well as by Member States and the European Commission,
C. ker je Komisija izrazila pomisleke in od madžarske vlade zahtevala informacije v zvezi s skladnostjo madžarskega zakona o medijih z direktivo o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, zlasti kar zadeva obveznost glede uravnoteženosti poročanja, ki velja za vse ponudnike avdiovizualnih medijskih storitev, pri čemer je pod vprašaj postavila tudi njegovo skladnost z načelom sorazmernosti in temeljnimi pravicami glede svobode izražanja in obveščanja iz člena 11 Evropske listine temeljnih pravic, načelom države izvora in zahtevami za prijavo, nakar je madžarska vlada zagotovila dodatne informacije ter izrazila pripravljenost za ponovni pregled in spremembo omenjenega zakona,
C. whereas the Commission has raised concerns and requested information from the Hungarian government in relation to the conformity of the Hungarian media laws with the AMSD, notably in relation to the obligation of balanced coverage applicable to all audiovisual media service providers, questioning also its compliance with the principle of proportionality and the fundamental rights of freedom of expression and information enshrined in Article 11 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the country of origin principle, the registration requirements, and whereas the Hungarian government responded by providing further information and by declaring their readiness to review the laws and amend them,
D. ker se Evropski parlament strinja z OVSE, ki je izrazil pomisleke, da sta sestava in časovni okvir organa in sveta za medije politično homogena Pismo predstavnika OVSE za svobodo medijev predsedniku odbora EP LIBE, 14. januar 2010.
D. whereas the European Parliament shares the serious doubts expressed by the OSCE, that the composition and the timeframe of the Media Authority and Media Council are politically homogeneous Letter by OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media to the EP Chairman of the LIBE committee, 14.01.2010.
ter da izvajata obsežen in centraliziran vladni, pravosodni in politični nadzor nad vsemi mediji, da so najbolj sporni elementi zakona v nasprotju z standardi OVSE in mednarodnimi standardi glede svobode izražanja, na primer odprava politične in finančne neodvisnosti javnih medijev, pa tudi pomisleke v zvezi s področjem uporabe te zakonodaje (vsebinsko področje uporabe in ozemeljska veljavnost), pri čemer so ključni termini ostali neopredeljeni, tako da novinarji ne morejo vedeti, v katerih primerih morebiti kršijo omenjeni zakon;
and exert a pervasive and centralized governmental, judicial and political control on all media; that the most problematic features of the legislation contradict OSCE and international standards on freedom of expression, such as the abolition of the political and financial independence of public service media; the scope of the regulation (material and territorial); leaving key terms undefined making it impossible for journalists to know when they potentially breach the law,