natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so te reforme privedle do bistvenih sprememb instrumentov pomoči v kmetijstvu, vendar so se ohranila tri temeljna načela skupne kmetijske politike, in sicer:
whereas these reforms have substantially altered farm support instruments, while maintaining the CAP's three founding principles, namely:
enotnost trga,
a unified market,
preferenca Skupnosti,
Community preference,
finančna solidarnost,
financial solidarity,
ker se bo morala SKP po letu 2013 soočiti s številnimi izzivi in slediti širšim ciljem, zato je treba proračun EU, namenjen SKP, ohraniti vsaj na sedanji ravni,
whereas, since the CAP will have to confront many challenges and pursue broader objectives after 2013, it is essential that the budget the EU allocates to the CAP is at least maintained at current levels;
ker Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije šteje večletni finančni okvir za pravno zavezujoč akt, s katerim mora biti usklajen letni proračun,
whereas the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union renders the multiannual financial framework (MFF) a legally binding act with which the annual budget has to comply,
ker odhodki v obliki neposredne pomoči predstavljajo 0,38 % BDP Evropske unije (podatek za leto 2008), ker odhodki, povezani s politiko razvoja podeželja predstavljajo 0,11 % evropskega BDP,
whereas expenditure in the form of direct aid accounts for 0.38% of EU GDP (2008 figure), whereas expenditure linked to the rural development policy accounts for 0.11% of EU GDP,
ker se Unija zaradi sedanjih majhnih razlik, ki so na voljo v razdelku 2 od proračunskega leta 2011 naprej, zelo težko ustrezno odziva na tržne krize in nepričakovane svetovne dogodke, poleg tega pa lahko zaradi njih letni proračunski postopek izgubi svoj pomen,
whereas the current small margins available under Heading 2 as from the 2011 budget year make it very difficult for the Union to respond appropriately to market crises and unexpected global events and may deprive the annual budgetary procedure of its substance,
ker je Evropski parlament z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe pridobil pristojnost za oblikovanje kmetijske politike Unije ne le pri večletnih kmetijskih programih, ampak tudi s spreminjanjem letnega proračuna za kmetijstvo, kar mu nalaga odgovornost, da zagotovi pošteno in trajnostno skupno kmetijsko politiko,
whereas, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament has gained the power to shape the Union's agricultural policy, not only as regards multiannual agricultural programmes but also by amending the annual budget for agriculture, thus giving Parliament responsibility for ensuring a fair and sustainable common agricultural policy,
ker je skupna kmetijska politika z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe predmet rednega zakonodajnega postopka, pri čemer ima Evropski parlament pomembno odgovornost, da pomaga sprejemati trdno in učinkovito zakonodajo na tem področju,
whereas with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Common Agricultural Policy is subject to the ordinary legislative procedure and the European Parliament has an important responsibility to help adopt sound and efficient legislation in this area,
ker v skladu z zadnjo raziskavo Eurobarometer 90 % anketiranih državljanov EU meni, da so kmetijstvo in podeželska območja pomembni za evropsko prihodnost, in se jih 83 % strinja s finančno pomočjo za kmete in v povprečju meni, da je treba kmetijsko politiko še naprej oblikovati na evropski ravni,
whereas according to the latest Eurobarometer, 90% of EU citizens surveyed consider agriculture and rural areas to be important for Europe's future, 83% of EU citizens surveyed are in favour of financial support to farmers and, on average, they believe that agricultural policy should continue to be decided upon at European level,
ker je treba cilje in vsebino prihodnje SKP obravnavati na obsežnih javnih razpravah, da bi se izboljšala seznanjenost javnosti z njo in ker je treba zato pozdraviti pobudo Komisije za javno razpravo o prihodnosti SKP po letu 2013,
whereas the objectives and substance of the future Common Agricultural Policy must be subject to broad public discussion in order to increase public knowledge of the CAP, and whereas the Commission's initiative on the public debate on the future of the CAP after 2013 is therefore to be welcomed;
ker mora biti SKP usmerjena v ohranjanje in razvoj večfunkcionalnega, celovitega in sonaravnega kmetijstva v Evropi;
whereas the CAP must be geared to the maintenance and development of multifunctional, area-wide, sustainable agriculture in Europe,
ponovno opozarja, da je SKP v zadnjih 25 letih doživela korenite reforme, ki so zlasti prispevale k temeljni preusmeritvi s pomoči proizvodnji na pomoč proizvajalcem Glej priloženi graf 1 (poročilo A7-0204/2010 ).
Recalls that the CAP has undergone radical reforms over the last 25 years, in particular bringing about a fundamental shift from production support to producer support See graph 1 annexed to report A7-0204/2010 .
, zmanjšale redne intervencijske odkupe in damping evropskih presežkov na svetovnih trgih Glej priloženi graf 2. (poročilo A7-0204/2010 ).
, reducing regular intervention buying and the dumping of European surpluses on world markets See graph 2 annexed to report A7-0204/2010 .
ter spodbudile večjo tržno naravnanost SKP in kmetov v EU;
and making the CAP and EU farmers more market-oriented;
opozarja, da je imela SKP izjemno pomembno vlogo pri povečanju proizvodnje in prehranjevanju evropskega prebivalstva po drugi svetovni vojni; opozarja pa tudi, da je bila SKP prva skupna politika EGS, ki je orala ledino evropskega sodelovanja in vključevanja v druga politična področja;
Recalls that the CAP played a crucial role in increasing production and feeding Europe's population after the Second World War; recalls furthermore that the CAP was the first common EEC policy, which paved the way for European cooperation and integration in other policy areas;
poudarja, da imajo tržni instrumenti SKP, ki so značilni za vsak posamezni sektor, bistveno vlogo, in se zdaj uporabljajo kot varnostne mreže, ki pomagajo zmanjševati nestanovitnost trga in zagotavljati kmetom neko raven stabilnosti; poudarja, da kmetje zaradi spremenjene tržne politike niso manj odvisni od kupcev; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je od sprejetja nevezanih enotnih plačil na kmetijo prišlo do odločnega odmika od ukrepov, ki izkrivljajo trgovino, kar je v skladu z zahtevami Svetovne trgovinske organizacije;
Points out that CAP market instruments specific to each sector play a fundamental role and are now used as safety nets to help reduce market volatility in order to guarantee farmers a certain degree of stability; (stresses that the changed market policy has not led to a reduction in farmers' dependence on purchasers; notes, moreover, that since the adoption of decoupled Single Farm Payments there has been a resolute move away from trade-distorting measures in line with WTO requirements;
ugotavlja, da je bil namen reform SKP v letih 1992 in 1999, zlasti pa reforme leta 2003, ki je bila revidirana med sistematičnim pregledom in je uvedla načelo nevezanih plačil, ter različnih sektorskih reform zagotoviti kmetom v EU, da lahko učinkoviteje ukrepajo in se odzivajo na tržne signale in pogoje; upa, da se bo ta trend nadaljeval z novimi reformami, hkrati pa so zaradi posebnosti kmetijske proizvodnje še vedno potrebni nekateri tržni ukrepi;
Notes that the CAP reforms initiated in 1992 and 1999 and, in particular, the 2003 reform, which was reviewed during the Health Check and introduced the principle of decoupling, as well as the various sectoral reforms, were all intended to allow EU farmers to better respond and react to market signals and conditions; wishes this trend to continue in further reforms, while some market measures are still needed in view of the specific features of agricultural production;
poudarja, da je razvoj podeželja zdaj sestavni del strukture SKP in bi moral ostati pomembna prvina prihodnje SKP z dobro zasnovano strategijo za razvoj podeželja, ki bi se osredotočala na podeželske skupnosti, izboljšanje okolja, posodobitev in prestrukturiranje kmetijstva, krepitev kohezije na podeželju EU, oživljanje prikrajšanih območij in območij, ki jim grozi opustitev, izboljšanje trženja proizvodov in konkurenčnosti ter ohranjanje obstoječih in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest na podeželju, pa tudi na nove izzive, obravnavane med sistematskim pregledom, in sicer na podnebne spremembe, obnovljivo energijo, upravljanje voda in biotsko raznovrstnost;
Points out that rural development is now an integral part of the CAP architecture, and should remain an important element of the future CAP through a well-equipped rural development strategy with its focus on rural communities, improving the environment, modernising and restructuring agriculture, strengthening cohesion in EU rural areas, revitalising disadvantaged areas and areas at risk of abandonment, improving product marketing and competitiveness and maintaining employment and creating new jobs in rural areas, as well as on the new challenges addressed in the Health Check, namely climate change, renewable energies, water management and biodiversity;
opozarja, da kmetijstvo od nekdaj proizvaja javne dobrine, ki se v današnjem času opredeljujejo kot javne dobrine „prve generacije“; vztraja pri varnosti preskrbe s hrano, varni hrani ter visoki hranilni vrednosti kmetijskih proizvodov, ki morajo biti še naprej glavni razlog za skupno kmetijsko politiko, njeno bistvo in glavna skrb evropskih državljanov; novejše od omenjenih javnih dobrin, torej javne dobrine „druge generacije“ – okolje, načrtovanje rabe zemljišč ali dobro počutje živali, ki so prav tako cilji SKP, dopolnjujejo dobrine prve generacije in jih zato ne smejo nadomestiti.
Recalls that agriculture has always been a producer of public goods, or of what in today's context may be called ‘first-generation’ public goods, the reference here being to food security and food safety, and to the high nutritional value of agricultural produce, which should continue to constitute the primary raison d'être for the CAP, corresponding to its essence and representing the first concern of Europe's citizens; the more recently identified or ‘second-generation’ public goods, e.g. the environment, land management or animal welfare, while also objectives of the CAP, are complementary to the first-generation goods and should therefore not replace them;
pozdravlja priznavanje večnamenske vloge kmetov pri zagotavljanju javnih dobrin, kot so ohranjanje okolja, proizvodnja visokokakovostne hrane, ustrezna vzreja živine ter oblikovanje in izboljšanje raznovrstnosti in kakovosti dragocenih krajin v EU, in preusmeritev na bolj sonaravne kmetijske prakse, ne le z izpolnitvijo osnovnih zahtev za vzdrževanje zemljišč v skladu z dobrimi kmetijskimi in okoljskimi pogoji, ampak tudi z doseganjem vedno višjih standardov s kmetijsko-okoljskimi programi, preciznim kmetovanjem, ekološko pridelavo in vsemi drugimi oblikami sonaravne kmetijske prakse;
Welcomes the recognition of the multi-functional role of farmers in delivering public goods such as preserving our environment, high-quality food production, good animal husbandry, shaping and improving the diversity and quality of valued landscapes in the EU, and the move to more sustainable farming practices by not only meeting the basic requirements for maintenance of the land in a Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition (GAEC) but also achieving even higher standards through agri-environmental schemes, precision farming, organic production and all other forms of sustainable agricultural practice;
ponovno opozarja, da je SKP najcelovitejša politika od vseh politik EU in ima zato največji delež proračuna EU; se zaveda, da se njen delež v proračunu vztrajno zmanjšuje, s približno 75 % skupnega proračuna EU leta 1985 na 39,3 %, kolikor bo znašal leta 2013 Glej priloženi graf 3 (poročilo A7-0204/2010 ).
Recalls that the CAP is the most integrated of all EU policies and therefore logically accounts for the largest share of the EU budget; recognises that its share of the budget has steadily decreased from about 75% of the total EU budget in 1985 to 39.3% by 2013 See graph 3 annexed to report A7-0204/2010 .
, kar pomeni manj kot 0,45 % celotnega BDP Evropske unije Glej priloženi graf 4 (poročilo A7-0204/2010 ).
, representing less than 0.45% of total EU GDP See graph 4 annexed to report A7-0204/2010 .
, hkrati pa je pomoč danes po pristopu 12 novih držav članic k EU bolj razpršena;
, whilst at the same time support is more thinly spread today with 12 new Member States joining the EU;
zato meni, da se je SKP razvila, postala bolj zelena in bolj tržno usmerjena ter je znatno zmanjšala svoj vpliv na države v razvoju, hkrati pa podpira kmete, da lahko proizvajajo visokokakovostno hrano za evropske potrošnike;
Is of the opinion, therefore, that the CAP has evolved, becoming greener and more market-orientated, and has dramatically reduced its impact on developing countries, whilst at the same time supporting farmers to produce high-quality food for European consumers;
Izzivi, na katere se mora odzvati SKP po letu 2013
The challenges that the CAP post-2013 must respond to
poudarja, da varnost preskrbe s hrano ostaja glavni izziv za kmetijstvo ne samo v EU, ampak po vsem svetu, zlasti v državah v razvoju, saj se bo število svetovnega prebivalstva do leta 2050 predvidoma povečalo s 7 na 9 milijard, medtem ko se bo povpraševanje po hrani po napovedih Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo do tega leta podvojilo (zlasti v državah z gospodarstvom v vzponu, kot sta Kitajska in Indija);
Points out that food security remains the central challenge for agriculture not only in the EU but globally, in particular in developing countries, as the world population is predicted to grow from 7 to 9 billion by 2050 and demand for food is projected to double by 2050 according to the FAO (especially in emerging economies such as China and India);
potrjuje, da mora Evropa še naprej prispevati k svetovni preskrbi s hrano, da bi prispevala k zadovoljitvi teh potreb glede na vse večje opuščanje kmetovanja, vse manj vode in zmanjšanega energijskega vložka zaradi učinkov podnebnih sprememb, ki bodo resno omejili zmogljivost Evrope, da poveča ponudbo;
Affirms that Europe must continue to contribute to global food supplies in order to make a contribution to meeting that need against a background of increasing discontinuation of farming, less water and reduced energy inputs owing to the impact of climate change, which will act as a serious constraint on European capacity to increase supply;
ugotavlja, da se bodo zaradi svetovne energetske krize in povišanja cen energije povišali stroški kmetijske proizvodnje, zaradi česar se bodo povišale cene hrane in povečala nestanovitnost tržnih cen tako za kmete kot za potrošnike, kar bo neugodno vplivalo na stabilnost preskrbe s hrano in resno omejilo sposobnost ohranjanja in povišanja sedanjih ravni proizvodnje; kljub temu meni, da bi lahko energetska samozadostnost kmetijskega in gozdarskega sektorja izboljšala njuno trajnost;
Notes that the global energy crisis and increasing energy prices will drive agricultural production costs up, leading to rising food prices and increasing market price volatility for both farmers and consumers, which will have a detrimental effect on the stability of food supply and will seriously constrain the ability to maintain and increase current production levels; considers, however, that energy self-sufficiency for the agriculture and forestry sectors could increase its sustainability;
meni, da je kmetijstvo na dobri poti, da znatno prispeva k boju proti podnebnim spremembam z nadaljnjim zmanjševanjem izpusta toplogrednih plinov in povečevanjem sekvestracije ogljika;
Believes that agriculture is well placed to make a significant contribution to the fight against climate change by continuing to reduce its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions and increasing carbon sequestration;
priznava, da je kmetijstvo že močno napredovalo pri zmanjšanju izpusta toplogrednih plinov in reševanju okoljskih vprašanj nasploh (upravljanje voda, zemljišč, biotska raznovrstnost, biomasa ...), vendar meni, da bi bilo treba nadaljevati ta prizadevanja, da bi se proizvodne metode uskladile z bolj trajnostnim razvojem, ki bi bil v okoljskem in socialnem ter gospodarskem pogledu učinkovit;
Recognises that farming has already made considerable progress in cutting its greenhouse gas emissions and, in general, addressing environmental problems (management of water resources, soil, biodiversity, biomass, etc.), but maintains that those efforts need to be continued in order to gear production methods to a more sustainable form of development that is efficient in environmental and social, as well as economic, terms;
ponovno opozarja, da je treba izpolniti pričakovanja potrošnikov po zagotovljeni varnosti preskrbe s hrano ter njihove zahteve po višjih standardih kakovosti, boljšem počutju živali ter ugodnem razmerju med ceno in vrednostjo;
Recalls that consumers' expectations of guaranteed food safety must be met, as well as their demands for higher quality standards, better animal welfare and good value for money;
meni, da mora SKP še naprej zagotavljati rešitve in konkretno pomoč za preprečevanje nevarnosti opuščanja zemljišč in izseljevanja s podeželja ter staranja podeželskega prebivalstva v EU, tako da se uvede namenska finančna sredstva in pomoč, s tem pa zagotovi dolgoročna trajnost podeželskih skupnosti v EU; zato meni, da je treba pri SKP tudi nadaljevati ciljno usmerjen razvoj podeželja;
Considers that the CAP must continue to provide solutions to, and tangible assistance in combating, the threat of land abandonment, rural depopulation and the ageing of the rural population in the EU by establishing appropriate funding and assistance for that purpose, in order to ensure the long-term sustainability of rural communities in the EU; , believes, therefore, that it is also necessary to continue with target-oriented rural development within the CAP;
meni, da mora SKP zagotoviti takojšen odziv na učinke gospodarske krize na kmetijsko dejavnost, kot so pomanjkanje dostopa do kreditov za kmete, omejitve prihodkov kmetij Glej priloženi graf 5 (poročilo A7-0204/2010 ).
Believes that the CAP must provide immediate responses to the effects of the economic crisis on farming businesses such as the lack of access to credit for farmers, constraints on farm incomes See graph 5 annexed to report A7-0204/2010 .
in povečanje stopnje brezposelnosti na podeželju;
, and increasing rural unemployment;
zato opozarja, da bi lahko različne zmogljivosti držav članic, da premagajo gospodarsko krizo, privedle do vse večjih razlik med podeželskimi regijami v EU;
Points out, therefore, that differences in the capacity of Member States to deal with the economic crisis might result in increasing inequalities among rural regions in the EU;
priznava, da mora SKP upoštevati razlike v strukturi in potrebe po posodobitvi kmetijstva v razširjeni EU, da bi dosegli enako raven razvoja in kohezije,
Recognises that the CAP must take into account the differences in structure and modernisation needs of agriculture in the enlarged EU, with the aim of achieving equal levels of development and cohesion;
meni, da je treba prednostne naloge SKP za obdobje po letu 2013 glede na te izzive umestiti v trdno, trajnostno, dobro podprto in verodostojno večnamensko prehrambno in kmetijsko politiko, ki bo pošiljala jasne znake, da učinkovito in usmerjeno podpira kmete ter rešuje težave podeželskih skupnosti, s tem pa koristi celotni družbi;
Believes that, in the light of these challenges, the CAP priorities post-2013 should be embedded in a strong, sustainable, well supported and credible multifunctional food and agricultural policy which sends strong signals to support farmers efficiently in a targeted manner and provide answers to the concerns of the rural community whilst benefiting the wider society;
Zadovoljevanje socialno-ekonomskih potreb
Meeting socio-economic needs
meni, da je glede na strategijo Evropa 2020 potrebna trdna in trajnostna skupna kmetijska politika, ki bo delovala v korist vseh evropskih kmetov in zagotavljala širšo družbeno korist; meni, da mora ta politika kmetijstvu omogočiti, da ima svoje mesto v evropskem gospodarstvu, in zagotoviti sredstva, da bo konkurenčno na svetovnih trgih; meni, da se EU zaradi strateških razlogov ne more zanašati na to, da bi glede na podnebne spremembe, politično nestabilnost v nekaterih regijah sveta in možne izbruhe bolezni ali drugih dogodkov, ki bi lahko škodili proizvodni zmogljivosti, drugi deli sveta zagotavljali evropsko varnost preskrbe s hrano;
Is of the opinion that, in the light of the Europe 2020 Strategy, a strong and sustainable European Common Agricultural Policy is needed to serve the interests of all European farmers and deliver wider benefits to society; takes the view that it should enable agriculture to play its part in the European economy and ensure it has the tools to compete on world markets; believes that, for strategic reasons, the EU cannot afford to rely on other parts of the world to provide for European food security in the context of climate change, political instability in certain regions of the world and potential outbreaks of disease or other events potentially detrimental to production capacity;
ponovno opozarja, da kmetijstvo EU ostaja osrednji sektor gospodarstva EU in tako neposredno kot posredno veliko prispeva k BDP Evropske unije in delovnim mestom z multiplikacijskim učinkom za predhodni in naknadni trg industrije hrane in pijač; zato meni, da sta močno kmetijstvo ter industrija hrane in pijače neločljivo povezana ter da je njun uspeh medsebojno pogojen, zlasti pri izvozu;
Recalls that EU agriculture remains a central sector of the EU economy, making an important contribution to EU GDP and jobs both directly and indirectly through the multiplier effect on both the upstream and downstream food and drink industry market; believes, therefore, that a strong agriculture and a strong food and drink industry are inextricably linked, with each contributing to the other's success, in particular on export markets;
ponovno opozarja, da je eden od glavnih razlogov, zakaj EU potrebuje trdno skupno kmetijsko politiko ta, da prispeva k ohranitvi in razvoju vitalnih in dinamičnih podeželskih skupnosti v središču evropske kulturne raznovrstnosti, ki lahko zagotovijo trajnosten in uravnotežen socialno-ekonomski razvoj na celotnem evropskem ozemlju; meni, da je treba zato zmanjšati socialno-gospodarski razkorak med podeželskimi in mestnimi skupnostmi, da bi se izognili vse večjemu opuščanja zemljišč in odseljevanju s podeželja, ki še dodatno prispeva k osamitvi podeželskih območij;
Recalls that one of the main reasons why the EU needs a strong CAP is to contribute to the maintenance and development of viable and dynamic rural communities, at the heart of European cultural diversity, and that they are the key to sustainable, balanced socio-economic development across all European territory; takes the view that this calls for the socio-economic gap between rural and urban communities to be narrowed, in order to avoid the growing land abandonment and rural depopulation which are further isolating rural areas;