natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the transparency and state of play of the ACTA [Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement] negotiations,
– ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o reviziji okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo,
– having regard to its decision of 20 October 2010 on the revision of the framework agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission,
– ob upoštevanju razprave na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to the plenary debate of 20 October 2010 on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka trgovinskega sporazuma za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA) z dne 2. oktobra 2010,
– having regard to the 2 October 2010 draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju odločbe Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o pritožbi št. 90/2009(JD)OV glede dostopa do dokumentov v zvezi s sporazumom ACTA,
– having regard to the European Ombudsman’s decision on complaint 90/2009/(JD)OV relating to access to ACTA documents,
– ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo (2003/C 321/01),
– having regard to the Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Law-Making between Parliament, the Council and the Commission (2003/C 321/01),
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS),
– having regard to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS),
A. ker je boj proti ponarejanju bistven del politične strategije EU za zagotavljanje pravice, enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vse proizvajalce, ohranjanje zaposlitev državljanov in spoštovanje pravne države,
A. whereas the fight against counterfeiting represents a key element in the EU political strategy with a view to ensuring justice, a level playing field for our producers, the maintenance of employment for citizens and respect for the rule of law,
B. ker je za učinkovitejši boj proti ponarejanju, ki je svetovni pojav, potrebno mednarodno sodelovanje največjih svetovnih akterjev,
B. whereas, in order to be more effective, the fight against counterfeiting – which is a worldwide phenomenon – requires stronger international cooperation among the major world players,
C. ker kljub številnim poskusom, da bi dosegli mnogostranski pristop, ki je še vedno glavni cilj strategije EU, to še vedno ni uspelo zaradi odpora in nasprotovanja svetovnih akterjev in ker se zato zdi, da je večstranski sporazum najboljši način za obravnavo posebnih vprašanj na mednarodni ravni,
C. whereas, despite several attempts to achieve a multilateral approach – which remains the main goal in the EU strategy – this could not be pursued because of resistance and opposition from other global players, and whereas the plurilateral agreement therefore seems to be the best way of addressing specific concerns at an international level,
D. ker sporazum ACTA zadevajo samo ukrepi za uveljavljanje, kot je Komisija večkrat poudarila, in v njem ni določb, ki spreminjajo temeljno zakonodajo o intelektualni lastnini Evropske unije ali drugih pogodbenic sporazuma ACTA, temveč prvič vzpostavlja celostni mednarodni okvir za pomoč udeležencem pri njihovih prizadevanjih za učinkovit boj proti kršenju intelektualnih pravic, zato ne spreminja pravnega reda Unije,
D. whereas, as the Commission has repeatedly stated, ACTA is concerned solely with enforcement measures and does not include provisions modifying the substantive intellectual property rights (IPR) law of the EU or the other ACTA parties, but rather establishes, for the first time, a comprehensive international framework to assist the parties in their efforts to combat IPR infringements effectively, and it does not therefore imply any change to the acquis com munautaire ,
E. ker sporazum ACTA presega področje uporabe sporazuma TRIPS pri številnih temah, tudi pri določbah za digitalni sektor in na področju uporabe obveznih obmejnih ukrepov, zato lahko lastnikom pravic ponudi boljšo zaščito,
E. whereas, in many areas, including provisions for the digital sector and the scope of compulsory border measures, ACTA goes beyond the scope of TRIPS and therefore affords right-holders better protection,
F. ker se je preglednost pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA po ostrem protestu Parlamenta bistveno izboljšala in je Parlament od kroga pogajanja v Novi Zelandiji dobival popolno poročilo o poteku pogajanj; ker se je seznanil s besedilom, doseženim s pogajanji, en teden po zaključku zadnjega kroga na Japonskem,
F. whereas, after strong representations by Parliament, the level of transparency of the ACTA negotiations was fundamentally improved and, since the negotiating round in New Zealand, Parliament has been fully informed of the course of the negotiations; and whereas it took cognisance of the negotiated text one week after the conclusion of the last round in Japan,
G. ker so iz besedila, doseženega s pogajanji, razvidni pomisleki Parlamenta iz preteklih mesecev, tudi glede vprašanj, kot so spoštovanje temeljnih pravic, zasebnosti in varovanja podatkov, spoštovanje pomembne vloge svobodnega svetovnega spleta, pomen zaščite vloge ponudnikov storitev in potreba po zaščiti dostopa do zdravil (sklicevanje na Deklaracijo iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, sprejete 14. novembra 2001 in vključene v preambulo sporazuma),
G. whereas the negotiated text reflects the main concerns expressed by Parliament over recent months, including on issues such as the observance of fundamental rights, privacy and data protection, respect for the important role of free Internet, the importance of safeguarding the role of service providers, and the need to safeguard access to medicines – a reference to the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on 14 November 2001, having been incorporated into the preamble to the agreement,
H. ker je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da je treba izvajati zaščito geografskih oznak; ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA dogovorile, da bodo geografske oznake uveljavljale,
H. whereas the Commission has repeatedly affirmed the importance of enforcing the protection of geographical indications (GIs); whereas it has been agreed by parties to the agreement that ACTA will provide for the enforcement of GIs,
I. ker mora Komisija kot varuh pogodb ohranjati pravni red Skupnosti in da ga ne sme spreminjati, kadar se pogaja o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo EU, ter ker se je Komisija obvezala, da bo Parlament nemudoma in v celoti obveščala na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih,
I. whereas the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, is obliged to uphold the acquis communautaire when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU, and whereas the Commission has committed itself to providing immediate and full information to Parliament at every stage of negotiations on international agreements,
J. ker je bistveno zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine razvijejo na takšen način, da ne bodo ovirali inovacij ali konkurence, ogrožali omejitev v zvezi s pravicami intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, omejevali prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjevali zakonitega trgovanja,
J. whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade,
K. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu s pravnim redom Unije, kar zadeva zlasti zakonske obveznosti, ki jih ima EU v zvezi s spoštovanjem zasebnosti in varstvom podatkov, kot določajo Direktiva 95/46/ES, Direktiva 2002/58/ES ter druga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
K. whereas any agreement reached by the EU on ACTA must comply fully with the acquis communautaire, and this relates particularly to legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection, notably as provided for in Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice,
L. ker bo moral Parlament zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe decembra 2009 dati privolitev za besedilo sporazuma ACTA, preden sporazum začne veljati v Evropski uniji,
L. whereas, as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009, Parliament will have to give consent to the ACTA text prior to the agreement’s entry into force in the EU,
3. se v celoti zaveda, da s pogajanji dosežen sporazum ne bo rešil zapletenega in večdimenzionalnega problema ponarejanja; vendar meni, da je korak v pravo smer;
Is fully aware that the agreement negotiated will not solve the complex and multi-dimensional problem of counterfeiting; considers, however, that it is a step in the right direction;
5. pozdravlja trditev iz preambule osnutka posvetovalnega besedila z dne 2. oktobra 2010, da je cilj sporazuma ACTA, da omogoči učinkovita in ustrezna sredstva za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, pri čemer dopolnjuje sporazum TRIPS in upošteva razlike v posameznih pravnih sistemih in praksah podpisnic sporazuma ACTA; vztraja na načelih iz Deklaracije iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, ki jo je STO sprejela 14. novembra 2001 na svoji četrti ministrski konferenci v Dohi (Katar), ki so temelji osnutka posvetovalnega besedila sporazuma ACTA z dne 2. oktobra 2010 in jih zato mora vsako izvajanje sporazuma ACTA upoštevati;
Welcomes the fact that the deliberative draft text of 2 October 2010 confirms, in its preamble, ACTA’s aim of providing effective and appropriate means of IPR enforcement, complementing the TRIPS agreement and taking into account differences in the respective legal systems and practices of the ACTA parties; and insists on the fact that the principles set out in the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on 14 November 2001 by the WTO at its Fourth Ministerial Conference, held in Doha, Qatar, are the building blocks underpinning the ACTA deliberative draft text of 2 October 2010 and that, therefore, any enforcement of ACTA should comply with these principles;
9. izraža obžalovanje, ker sporazum v svojem členu 1.X ne opredeljuje ponarejanja geografskih označb, kar bi lahko povzročilo zmedo ali vsaj zapletlo naloge upravnih in sodnih organov pri obrazložitvi in izvajanju sporazuma ACTA;
Finds it regrettable that, in its Article 1.X, the agreement does not define ‘counterfeit geographical indications’, as this omission could create confusion or at least complicate the tasks of administrative and judicial authorities in the interpretation and enforcement of ACTA;
14. poudarja, da morajo vsi sklepi Komisije kot dela odbora za sporazum ACTA soditi v področje uporabe pravnega reda EU in ne morejo enostransko spreminjati vsebine sporazuma; zato meni, da morata Parlament in Svet vse predloge sprememb sprejemati v skladu s členoma 207 in 218 PDEU;
Emphasises that any decision taken by the Commission as part of the ACTA Committee must lie within the scope of the acquis and may not unilaterally change the content of ACTA; considers therefore that any proposed change to ACTA would need to be adopted by Parliament and the Council in accordance with Article 207 and 218, TFEU;
o pripravah na postopek odobritve trgovinskega sporazuma za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
on ACTA – preparing for the consent procedure
PE450.452v01-00 B7‑0619/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pripravah na postopek odobritve trgovinskega sporazuma za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
PE450.452v01-00 B7‑0619/2010 European Parliament resolution on ACTA – preparing for the consent procedure
– ob upoštevanju strategije za učinkovito izvajanje Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to the Strategy for the effective implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights by the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju svoje pisne izjave 0012/2010 o premajhni preglednosti postopka, povezanega s trgovinskim sporazumom proti ponarejanju (ACTA) in morebitni sporni vsebini,
– having regard to its Written Declaration 0012/2010 on the lack of a transparent process for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA),
– ob upoštevanju razprave na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to the Plenary Debate on 20 October 2010 on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov o trenutnih pogajanjih Evropske unije o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju in pisma delovne skupine za varstvo podatkov Evropski komisiji,
– having regard to the opinions of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, and the letter from the Data Protection Working Party to the European Commission,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES o elektronskem poslovanju, Direktive 2001/29/ES o informacijski družbi in sporočila Komisije o evropskem programu za digitalne tehnologije,
– having regard to the E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC, the Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC and the Commissions communication on A Digital Agenda for Europe,
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje (2003/C 321/01),
– having regard to the Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Law-Making between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission (2003/C 321/01),
– ob upoštevanju Deklaracije iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, ki jo je Svetovna trgovinska organizacija sprejela 4. novembra 2001,
– having regard to the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on November 14, 2001 by WTO,
B. ker je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da je treba izvajati varstvo geografskih oznak; ker so se pogodbenice dogovorile, da se bodo geografske oznake uveljavljale v splošnih oddelkih sporazuma ACTA ter v oddelkih o civilnih zadevah, o carinah in o digitalnem okolju,
B. whereas the Commission has repeatedly affirmed the importance of enforcing the protection of geographical indications (GIs); whereas it has been agreed by parties that ACTA will provide for the enforcement of GIs in the general sections, as well as in the civil, customs and digital sections,
K. ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA zavezale k ohranitvi obveznosti iz člena 7 sporazuma TRIPS, da bi prispevale k spodbujanju tehnoloških inovacij; ker se temeljne politike EU v zvezi z medobratovalnostjo opirajo na določbe pravnega reda Skupnosti, ki podpirajo obratno inženirstvo,
K. whereas ACTA parties have committed to upholding obligations under Article 7 of the TRIPS Agreement to contribute to the promotion of technological innovation; whereas fundamental EU policies related to interoperability rely on provisions in the acquis communautaire supporting reverse engineering,
13. poziva Komisijo, naj pravočasno pred parafiranjem sporazuma izrecno potrdi, da določbe sporazuma ACTA ne posegajo v določbe pravnega reda EU, kot so določbe direktive o programski opremi 91/250/EGS in direktive o informacijski družbi 2001/29/ES, ter v izvajanje teh določb s strani držav članic, ki v nekaterih primerih omogočajo obratno inženirstvo programske opreme in izogibanje varovalnim tehničnim ukrepom, da bi zagotovili medobratovalnost in tako spodbudili konkurenco in inovacije;
Asks the Commission to explicitly confirm, in due time before the initialling of the Agreement, that ACTA's provisions leave unaffected the provisions in the acquis communautaire such as those contained in the Software Directive 91/250/EEC and the Information Society Directive 2001/29/EC and Member State implementations thereof that permit in some cases reverse engineering of computer programs and circumvention of TPMs in order to enable interoperability, thereby promoting competition and innovation;
16. meni, da bi se morala Komisija zavzemati za ustrezno prožnost postopkov in pogojev za pristop k sporazumu ACTA in v skladu s sklepi Sveta o usklajenosti politik za razvoj upoštevati stopnjo razvoja, potrebe in cilje držav pristopnic; poziva Komisijo, naj obvesti Parlament o morebitnem vplivu sporazuma ACTA na zunanjo in razvojno politiko EU, zlasti glede njene vloge v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji in Svetovni organizaciji za intelektualno lastnino, ter o določbe sporazuma TRIPS plus v sporazumu ACTA;
Takes the opinion that the Commission should advocate that procedures and terms of accession to ACTA are appropriately flexible and take into account the development levels, needs and objectives of acceding countries, in line with the Council Conclusions on Policy Coherence for Development; asks the Commission to inform the Parliament of the potential impact of ACTA on EU foreign and development policy with special reference to its role in the WTO and World Intellectual Property Organization and the TRIPS plus provisions in ACTA;
18. opozarja Komisijo in Svet, da bo odobritev sporazuma ACTA v Parlamentu odvisna od polnega in enakopravnega sodelovanja s Parlamentom in izpolnitve te resolucije v celoti, zlasti glede parafiranja sporazuma, ter delovanja ob upoštevanju mnenj Parlamenta;
Reminds the Commission and the Council that the Parliament's consent to ACTA will be dependent on full and equal cooperation with the Parliament and the complete discharge of this resolution, particularly in regards to the initialling of the Agreement, and acting with due consideration of the Parliament's opinions;
o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA)
on ACTA
PE450.454v01-00 B7‑0620/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA)
PE450.454v01-00 B7‑0620 European Parliament resolution on ACTA
– ob upoštevanju členov 207 in 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 207 and 218 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenega člena 8,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular its Article 8,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov zadnjega kroga pogajanj 2. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA),
– having regard to the conclusion of the last round of negotiations, on 2 October 2010, of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju objave končnega besedila sporazuma ACTA 15. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the public release of the final ACTA Text, on 15 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. decembra 2008 o vplivu ponarejanja na mednarodno trgovino ( 2008/2133(INI) ),
– having regard to its Resolution of 18 December 2008 on ‘the impact of counterfeiting on international trade’ ( 2008/2133(INI) ),
– ob upoštevanju plenarnih razprav 8. septembra in 20. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju,
– having regard to the Plenary Debates on 8 September and 20 October 2010 on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o pritožbi 90/2009/(JD)OV v zvezi z dostopom do dokumentov ACTA,
– having regard to the European Ombudsman’s decision on complaint 90/2009/(JD)OV relating to access to ACTA documents,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov o sedanjih pogajanjih Evropske unije o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju in pisma delovne skupine za varstvo podatkov Evropski komisiji,
– having regard to the opinions of the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement , and the letter from the Data Protection Working Party to the European Commission,
– ob upoštevanju prakse „prijateljev predsedstva“, katere namen je razpravljanje o morebitnih kazenskopravnih vidikih sporazuma,
– having regard to the practice named ‘Friends of the Presidency’ aimed at discussing ‘any criminal law aspects of the agreement that may arise’,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju),
– having regard to Directive 2000/31/EC of European Parliament and Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on Electronic Commerce),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009,
– having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of European Parliament and Council concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju novic Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o svetu za TRIPS 8. in 9. junija 2010,
– having regard to WTO news release on the 8-9 June 2010 TRIPS Council,
– ob upoštevanju člena 110 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 110 of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker je skupna trgovinska politika v izključni pristojnosti Evropske unije, ker bo moral Parlament po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe odobriti besedilo sporazuma ACTA, preden bo v Evropski uniji začelo veljati,
A. whereas the EU has exclusive competence in the area of the Common Commercial Policy (CCP); whereas as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament will have to give its consent to the ACTA text, prior to its entry into force in the EU,
Stanje pogajanj in pogajalci
State of play of the negotiations and negotiators
B. ker so leta 2008 Evropska unija in druge države OECD začele pogajanja o novem večstranskem sporazumu za krepitev in uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine ter boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu (sporazum ACTA),
B. whereas in 2008 the European Union and other OECD countries opened negotiations on a new plurilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and combat counterfeiting (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - ACTA),
C. ker se je 11. in zadnji krog pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA zaključil v Tokiu na Japonskem 2. oktobra 2010,
C. whereas the 11th and latest round of the negotiations for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was concluded in Tokyo, Japan on 2 October 2010,
D. ker so pogajalci za sklenitev sporazuma ACTA 6. oktobra 2010 objavili prečiščeno besedilo, Komisija pa je nato o njem poročala Parlamentu; ker je Komisija 15. novembra 2010 objavila končno besedilo sporazuma ACTA; ker bo tehnični sestanek za dokončno pravno oblikovanje potekal od 30. novembra do 3. decembra (ali po potrebi 4. decembra) 2010 v Sydneyju,
D. whereas the ACTA negotiators made public the consolidated text on 6 October 2010 and thereafter, the Commission briefed Parliament; whereas the Commission publicly released the final ACTA Text on 15 November 2010; whereas a technical meeting to finalise the legal scrub will take place in Sydney (30 November - 3 December (or if necessary 4 December) 2010),
E. ker so se predstavniki Sveta skupaj s predstavniki Komisije udeležili krogov pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA,
E. whereas Council representatives have attended ACTA negotiation rounds alongside with Commission representatives,
F. ker se je pogajanj udeležilo samo enajst držav (Evropska unija se šteje kot država), med njimi dve državi v razvoju (Maroko in Mehika),
F. whereas only 11 countries (EU being counted as a country) and amongst them only two developing countries (Morocco and Mexico) participated in the negotiations,