natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
C. ker je v sodnem pozivu navedeno, da trditve iz tega intervjuja predstavljajo obrekovanje, to pa vodi do zahteve za odškodnino;
C. whereas according to the writ of summons, statements made in that interview constitute libel, resulting in a claim for damages;
D. ker so bile izjave podane in intervju objavljen v času, ko je bil Luigi de Magistris poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, saj je bil izvoljen leta 2009 na volitvah v Evropski parlament;
D. whereas statements were made and the interview was published at a time when Luigi de Magistris was a Member of the European Parliament, following his election at the 2009 European Parliament elections;
I. ker Luigi de Magistris z omenjenimi izjavami potemtakem ni opravljal svoje dolžnosti poslanca Evropskega parlamenta;
I. whereas Luigi de Magistris, in making the statements in question, was therefore not acting in the performance of his duties as a Member of the European Parliament;
Na zasedanju 12. septembra 2011 je predsednik v skladu s členom 6(3) Poslovnika razglasil, da je 20. julija 2011 prejel zahtevo Luigija de Magistrisa v zvezi z zaščito njegove poslanske imunitete v povezavi s členoma 8 in 9 Protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropske unije in s sklicevanjem na člen 68 ustave Republike Italije, ki je bil spremenjen z ustavnim zakonom št. 3 z dne 29. oktobra 1993.
At the sitting of 12 September 2011 the President announced, under Rule 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure, that on 20 July 2011 he had received a request from Mr Luigi de Magistris concerning the defence of his parliamentary immunity with reference to Articles 8 and 9 of the Protocol on privileges and immunities of the European Union and to Article 68 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic as amended by Constitutional Law No 3 of 29 October 1993.
Predsednik je zahtevo v skladu s členom 6(3) poslovnika posredoval Odboru za pravne zadeve.
The President referred the request to the Committee on Legal Affairs under Rule 6(3).
Ozadje zahteve za zaščito je naslednje: Luigi de Magistris je na zahtevo Antonia Saladina prejel sodni poziv pred sodišče v Lamezii v zvezi z izjavami, ki jih je podal v intervjuju, objavljenem v italijanskem časopisu Il Fatto Quotidiano 9. marca 2011.
The background to the request for defence is as follows: Mr De Magistris was summoned before the Court of Lemezia by Mr Antonio Saladino in connection with statements made by him in an interview published in the newspaper Il Fatto Quotidiano on 9 March 2011,
Antonio Saladino trdi, da je iz izjav de Magistrisa v intervjuju mogoče sklepati, da je sam nezakonito posegel v kazensko zadevo „Why not“, in sicer preko članstva v skrivnem omrežju, oblikovanem za ta namen.
Mr Saladino claims that Luigi de Magistris made statements in the interview to the effect that he would have unlawfully interfered in the criminal case ‘ Why not? ’ by membership in a secret network set up for this purpose.
Ko je Luigi de Magistris delal kot državni tožilec v Italiji, je vodil preiskavo v tej zadevi, Antonio Saladino pa je bil glavni osumljenec.
When Luigi de Magistris worked as a public prosecutor in Italy he conducted an investigation in this case, in which Mr Saladino was the main suspect.
Tožnik trdi, da so mu obtožbe de Magistrisa povzročile veliko škodo.
The claimant maintains that Luigi de Magistris’s accusations caused serious damage to him.
Luigi de Magistris medtem trdi, da je izjave v intervjuju podal v okviru svoje politične dejavnosti poslanca Evropskega parlamenta in v skladu s svojo pravico, da izrazi osebna mnenja o zadevah, za katere obstaja legitimni javni interes.
For his part, Luigi de Magistris submits that the declarations in the interview were made as part of his political activity as a Member of the European Parliament and in accordance with his right to express personal opinions on matters of legitimate public interest.
Izjave so bile podane in intervju objavljen v času, ko je bil Luigi de Magistris poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, saj je bil izvoljen leta 2009 na volitvah v Evropski parlament.
The statements were made and the interview was published at a time when Luigi de Magistris was a Member of the European Parliament, following his election during the 2009 European Parliament elections.
Vseeno je Sodišče nedavno odredilo, da „izjava poslanca Evropskega parlamenta izven te institucije, zaradi katere je sodno preganjan v svoji državi članici izvora za kaznivo dejanje lažnih obtožb, ne predstavlja mnenja, izraženega med opravljanjem njegovih parlamentarnih nalog , in tako zajetega v imuniteto, ki jo zagotavlja ta določba, razen če je ta izjava subjektivna ocena, ki ima neposredno, očitno povezavo z opravljanjem teh nalog “
However, the Court has also recently held that ‘a statement made by a Member of the European Parliament beyond the precincts of that institution and giving rise to prosecution in his Member State of origin for the offence of making false accusations does not constitute an opinion expressed in the performance of his parliamentary duties covered by the immunity afforded by that provision unless that statement amounts to a subjective appraisal having a direct, obvious connection with the performance of those duties ’
Zadeva Patriciello, citirana zgoraj, operativni del. .
Patriciello, cited above, operative part. .
Odbor zato meni, da Luigi de Magistris pri podajanju omenjenih izjav ni opravljal svojih nalog poslanca Evropskega parlamenta.
The Committee therefore considers that, in making the statements in question, Luigi de Magistris was not acting in the performance of his duties as Member of the European Parliament.
Na osnovi zgornjih preudarkov in v skladu s členom 6(3) Poslovnika ter po preučitvi razlogov za in proti zaščiti imunitete poslanca Odbor za pravne zadeve priporoča, da Evropski parlament ne zaščiti poslanske imunitete Luigija de Magistrisa.
On the basis of the above considerations and pursuant to Article 6(3) of the Rules of Procedure, after considering the reasons for and against defending the Member’s immunity, the Committee on Legal Affairs recommends that the European Parliament should not defend the parliamentary immunity of Luigi De Magistris.
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 428/2009 o vzpostavitvi režima Skupnosti za nadzor izvoza, prenosa, posredovanja in tranzita blaga z dvojno rabo
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 428/2009 setting up a Community regime for the control of exports, transfer, brokering and transit of dual use items
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave (18144/1/2011 – C7‑0070/2012 ),
- having regard to the Council position at first reading (18144/1/2011– C7-0070/2012 ),
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča v prvi obravnavi
- having regard to its position at first reading
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(7) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
- having regard to Article 294(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju člena 72 Poslovnika,
- having regard to Rule 72 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7‑0078/2012 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0078/2012 ),
William grof Dartmouthski, Damien Abad, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Maria Badia i Cutchet, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle de Sarnez, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Keith Taylor, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil, Paweł Zalewski
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Damien Abad, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Maria Badia i Cutchet, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle de Sarnez, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Keith Taylor, Iuliu Winkler, Jan Zahradil, Paweł Zalewski
PREDLOG NEZAUPNICE
MOTION OF CENSURE
Evropski komisiji,
on the Commission
ki ga v skladu s členom 34(1) Poslovnika predlagajo poslanci
pursuant to Rule 34(1) of the Rules of Procedure
Abitbol William, Alyssandrakis Kostantinos, Andersen Bent Hindrup, Angelilli Roberta, Belder Bastiaan, Berlato Sergio, Bernié Jean-Louis, Berthu Georges, Bigliardo Roberto Felice, Blak Freddy, Blokland Johannes Hans, Bonde Jens-Peter, Booth Graham H., Butel Yves, Callanan Martin, Camre Mogens N.J., Cappato Marco, Caullery Isabelle, Couteaux Paul Marie, de la Perrière Thierry, Eriksson Marianne, Esclopé Alain, Farage Nigel Paul, Frahm Pernille, Gahrton Per, Goodwill Robert, Hager Gerhard, Hannan Daniel J., Heaton-Harris Christopher, Helmer Roger, Krarup Ole, Krivine Alain, Korakas Efstratios, Kronberger Hans, Kuntz Florence, Lucas Caroline, Marchiani Jean-Charles, Martin Hans-Peter, Mayol i Raynal Miquel, McKenna Patricia, Meijer Erik, Muscardini Cristiana, Nicholson James, Nobilia Mauro, Pasqua Charles, Patakis Ioannis, Raymond Michel, Sacrédeus Lennart, Saint-Josse Jean, Sandbaek Ulla Margrethe, Scarbonchi Michel, Schmid Herman, Schörling Inger, Seppänen Esko Olavi, Sjöstedt Jonas, Souchet Dominique F.C., Speroni Francesco Enrico, Sumberg David, Thomas-Mauro Nicole, Titford Jeffrey William, Turco Maurizio, Vachetta Roseline, van Dam Rijk, Varaut Alexandre, Villiers Theresa
by Abitbol William, Alyssandrakis Kostantinos, Andersen Bent Hindrup, Angelilli Roberta, Belder Bastiaan, Berlato Sergio, Bernié Jean-Louis, Berthu Georges, Bigliardo Roberto Felice, Blak Freddy, Blokland Johannes Hans, Bonde Jens-Peter, Booth Graham H., Butel Yves, Callanan Martin, Camre Mogens N.J., Cappato Marco, Caullery Isabelle, Couteaux Paul Marie, de la Perrière Thierry, Eriksson Marianne, Esclopé Alain, Farage Nigel Paul, Frahm Pernille, Gahrton Per, Goodwill Robert, Hager Gerhard, Hannan Daniel J., Heaton-Harris Christopher, Helmer Roger, Krarup Ole, Krivine Alain, Korakas Efstratios, Kronberger Hans, Kuntz Florence, Lucas Caroline, Marchiani Jean-Charles, Martin Hans-Peter, Mayol i Raynal Miquel, McKenna Patricia, Meijer Erik, Muscardini Cristiana, Nicholson James, Nobilia Mauro, Pasqua Charles, Patakis Ioannis, Raymond Michel, Sacrédeus Lennart, Saint-Josse Jean, Sandbaek Ulla Margrethe, Scarbonchi Michel, Schmid Herman, Schörling Inger, Seppänen Esko Olavi, Sjöstedt Jonas, Souchet Dominique F.C., Speroni Francesco Enrico, Sumberg David, Thomas-Mauro Nicole, Titford Jeffrey William, Turco Maurizio, Vachetta Roseline, van Dam Rijk, Varaut Alexandre, Villiers Theresa
Predlog nezaupnice Evropski komisiji
Motion of censure on the Commission
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in zlasti člena 201 te pogodbe,
having regard to the EC Treaty and particularly Article 201 thereof,
ob upoštevanju člena 34(1) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 34(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker Komisija ni prevzela odgovornosti za afero Eurostat,
whereas the Commission has not assigned responsibility for the Eurostat affair,
ker podelitev razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2002 ne more zasenčiti dejstva, da razrešnica za proračunsko leto 2001 ni bila zavrnjena "samo zato, ker Evropski parlament ni prejel pomembnih informacij glede afere Eurostat", in ker Komisija ne bi smela prezreti dela, ki ga je od marca 2003 naprej opravil Odbor za proračunski nadzor Evropskega parlamenta v okviru proračunskega leta 2001;
whereas the granting of the discharge for 2002 cannot overshadow the fact that it is 'only because Parliament had not been made aware of important information relating to the Eurostat affair' that the discharge was not refused in respect of the 2001 financial year and whereas the Commission cannot ignore the work done since March 2003 in the framework of the 2001 financial year by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control,
ker izjave za tisk komisarja Solbesa, da je sam vedno ravnal pravilno, niso zadosten odgovor na izjemno resne kritike glede ravnanja Komisije in komisarja Solbesa v aferi Eurostat, ki jih je izrazil organ za razrešitev v resoluciji z dne 29. januarja 2004;
whereas the very serious criticisms of the behaviour of the Commission and Commissioner Solbes over the Eurostat affair expressed by the discharge authority in its resolution of 29 January 2004 cannot be adequately answered merely by Commissioner Solbes's informing the press that he has always acted correctly,
ker je še bolj zaskrbljujoče, da kljub izkušnjam prejšnje Komisije in številnim zahtevam Evropskega parlamenta kulture prevzemanja odgovornosti še vedno ni ali pa obstajajo le elementi te kulture, in še ti le zaradi velikega zunanjega pritiska, in ker je zato treba poseči po pravnih instrumentih, kot je predlog nezaupnice;
whereas it is even more serious that, despite the experience of the previous Commission and the numerous requests of the European Parliament, there is still no culture of accountability or only a few elements thereof exist, and even those thanks only to maximum external pressure, and whereas it is therefore necessary to resort to the legal instrument of a motion of censure,
ker mora Komisija zaradi izgubljenega zaupanja prevzeti skupno odgovornost, saj ni ukrepala v zvezi s številnimi zahtevami, ki jih je Parlament označil kot izredno pomembne v resolucijah z dne 13. marca 2003 o varstvu finančnih interesov Skupnosti in boju proti goljufijam - letno poročilo 2001, z dne 8. aprila 2003 z ugotovitvami k sklepu glede razrešnice o izvrševanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2001, z dne 4. decembra 2003 o poročilu Komisije glede ovrednotenja dejavnosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) in z dne 29. januarja 2004 o ukrepih Komisije na podlagi ugotovitev resolucije k sklepu o podelitvi razrešnice za izvrševanje splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2001;
whereas, in view of the confidence which the Commission has forfeited, it must assume collective responsibility for not acting on a number of requests deemed to be of paramount importance by Parliament in its resolutions of 13 March 2003 on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud - annual report 2001, of 8 April 2003 containing the comments accompanying the decision concerning discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2001 financial year, of 4 December 2003 on the Commission report on the evaluation of the activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and of 29 January 2004 on the action taken by the Commission on the observations contained in the resolution accompanying the decision giving discharge in respect of the implementation of the general budget of the European Union for the 2001 financial year,
ker mora Komisija dajati verodostojne (kar zadeva vsebino) in jasne (ki se ne oddaljujejo od teme) odgovore na vsa vprašanja iz zgoraj omenjenih resolucij ali na tista, ki jih zastavijo posamezni poslanci v okviru njene edine preostale obveznosti, da nadaljuje s tekočimi posli, potem ko ni uspela izpolniti obveznosti iz člena 276 Pogodbe ES in lastne zaveze k "nični toleranci" in prizadevanju za "najboljšo upravo na svetu",
whereas the Commission must give real (as regards content) and clear (to the point) answers to all questions put in the above-mentioned resolutions or by individual Members, in connection with the Commission's sole remaining obligation to continue with current business after having failed to fulfil its obligations pursuant to Article 276 of the EC Treaty and its own commitments to 'zero tolerance' and achieving 'the best administration in the world',
daje nezaupnico Komisiji na podlagi teh razlogov;
Censures the Commission for these reasons;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj predlog nezaupnice posreduje Komisiji in o rezultatih glasovanja obvesti predsednika Sveta in predsednika Komisije.
Instructs its President to forward this motion of censure to the Commission and notify the President of the Council and the President of the Commission of the result of the vote.
Obrazložitev nezaupnice je v samem predlogu nezaupnice.
The reasons for censure are set out in the motion itself.
v skladu s členom 33(4) Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 33(4) of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vložijo Andrew Nicholas Duff v imenu politične skupine ELDR, Hans-Gert Poettering v imenu politične skupine PPE-DE, Enrique Barón Crespo v imenu politične skupine PSE,
by Andrew Nicholas Duff on behalf of the ELDR Group, Hans-Gert Poettering on behalf of the PPE-DE Group, Enrique Barón Crespo on behalf of the PSE Group
o potrditvi Komisije v novi sestavi
approving the Commission in its new form
Sklep o potrditvi Komisije v novi sestavi
Decision approving the Commission in its new form
ob upoštevanju tretjega pododstavka člena 214(2) in člena 215 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 214(2), third subparagraph, and Article 215 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Akta o pogojih pristopa Republike Češke, Republike Estonije, Republike Cipra, Republike Latvije, Republike Litve, Republike Madžarske, Republike Malte, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije in Slovaške republike in o prilagoditvah pogodb, na katerih temelji Evropska unija, ter zlasti člena 45 tega akta,
having regard to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic, and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, and in particular Article 45 thereof,
ob upoštevanju kandidatov, ki jih je 10 bodočih držav članic predlagalo za člane Evropske komisije, Pétra Balázsa, Joeja Borga, Jána Figl'a, Dalie Grybauskaitė, Danute Hübner, Siima Kallasa, Sandre Kalniete, Markosa Kyprianoua, Janeza Potočnika and Pavla Teličke,
having regard to the candidates nominated by the 10 acceding Member States for appointment as Members of the Commission, namely Péter Balázs, Joe Borg, Ján Figel', Dalia Grybauskaitė, Danuta Hübner, Siim Kallas, Sandra Kalniete, Markos Kyprianou, Janez Potočnik and Pavel Telička,
ob upoštevanju predstavitev kandidatov, ki jih je vodila konferenca predsednikov Parlamenta dne 13.-15. aprila 2004,
having regard to the hearings of the candidates conducted by its Conference of Committee Chairmen on 13-15 April 2004,
ob upoštevanju namere Sveta o imenovanju 10 novih članov Komisije najkasneje do 5. maja 2004, izražene v pismu predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. februarja 2004,
having regard to the Council's intention to appoint the 10 new Members of the Commission by 5 May 2004 at the latest, as stated in its letter of 26 February 2004 to the President of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju predstavitve nove, razširjene Komisije, ki jo je 5. maja 2004 pripravil njen predsednik,
having regard to the presentation of the new enlarged Commission made by its President on 5 May 2004,
ob upoštevanju člena 33 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 33 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov predstavitev desetih predlaganih komisarjev iz novih držav članic, povzetih v ocenah, ki so jih posamezni predsedniki parlamentarnih odborov naslovili na konferenco predsednikov odborov, in priporočil konference predsednikov odborov konferenci predsednikov,
noting the results of the hearings of the ten nominee Commissioners from the new Member States, as summarised in the evaluation letters addressed by the individual chairmen of the parliamentary committees to the chairman of the Conference of Committee Chairmen and the recommendation of the Conference of Committee Chairmen to the Conference of Presidents,
opozarja, da mora Parlament v skladu s postopkom, določenim v Pogodbah in Poslovniku Parlamenta, novo Komisijo potrditi, preden ta začne opravljati svoje naloge 1. novembra 2004, in da bodo celovite in odločilne predstavitve pred odbori Parlamenta potekale v tem času,
recalling that, in accordance with the procedure set out in the Treaties and Parliament's Rules of Procedure, Parliament will have to approve the new Commission in advance of its taking up its duties on 1 November 2004, and that comprehensive and decisive hearings by Parliament's committees will take place at that stage,
ugotavlja, da mora Prodijeva Komisija nadaljevati z opravljanjem nalog v skladu s svojim zakonodajnim in delovnim programom za leto 2004 ter resolucijo Parlamenta o tej temi vse do konca svojega mandata, vendar pričakuje, da v obdobju po volitvah ne bo sprejemala novih pobud z večjimi političnimi posledicami, ki se nanašajo na obdobje po izteku njenega mandata;
acknowledging that the Prodi Commission must continue to fulfil its duties in accordance with its 2004 legislative and work programme and Parliament's resolution on this subject right until the end of its mandate, but expecting it, for the period after the elections, not to take new initiatives of major political import relating to the period after the expiry of its mandate,
sklicujoč se na sklep Sveta z dne 9. julija 1999 o prenehanju izvajanja zamenjav komisarjev v odstopu, poziva države članice in Svet, da se vzdržijo zamenjave članov sedanje Komisije, ki odstopijo še pred iztekom njenega mandata,
recalling the Council's decision of 9 July 1999 not to proceed to the replacement of resigning Commissioners and urging the Member States and the Council to refrain from replacing members of the current Commission who retire before the end of its term of office,
ponovno poziva k vzporednosti mandatov Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije,
reiterating its call in favour of a parallelism of terms of office between the European Parliament and the Commission,
poziva k preveritvi postopka reševanja okoliščin, v katerih posamezni člani Komisije odstopijo še pred iztekom svojega mandata,
calling for a review of the procedure to cover circumstances in which individual Members of the Commission retire before their term of office ends,
potrdi Komisijo v novi obliki za preostanek mandata do 31. oktobra 2004;
Approves the Commission in its new form for the remainder of its term of office until 31 October 2004;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.
ki ga v skladu s členom 174 Poslovnika predlaga
pursuant to Rule 174 of the Rules of Procedure
konferenca predsednikov,
by the Conference of Presidents
o številčni sestavi odborov
on the numerical strength of the committees
Sklep o številčni sestavi odborov
Decision on the numerical strength of the committees
ob upoštevanju člena 174 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 174 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju sklepa z dne 29. januarja 2004 o številu in pristojnostih parlamentarnih odborov(1 Besedila, sprejeta dne 29.01.2004, P5_TA(2004)0050 ),
having regard to its decision of 29 January 2004 on the number, powers and responsibilities of committees Texts adopted on 29 January 2004, P5_TA(2004)0050 ,
sprejme sklep o naslednji številčni sestavi odborov:
Decides that the numerical strength of the committees shall be as follows:
Odbor za razvoj: 34 članov
Committee on Development: 34 members
Odbor za mednarodno trgovino: 33 članov
Committee on International Trade: 33 members
Odbor za proračun: 47 članov
Committee on Budgets : 47 members
Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve: 49 članov
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs: 49 members
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve: 50 članov
Committee on Employment and Social Affairs: 50 members
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano: 63 članov
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety: 63 members
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov: 40 članov
X. Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection: 40 members
Odbor za promet in turizem: 51 članov
Committee on Transport and Tourism: 51 members
Odbor za regionalni razvoj: 51 članov
Committee on Regional Development: 51 members
Odbor za kmetijstvo: 42 članov
Committee on Agriculture: 42 members