natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je naklonjen ohranitvi in poenostavitvi sistema zajamčene tradicionalne posebnosti (ZTP), vendar izraža razočaranje nad pomanjkljivo učinkovitostjo tega instrumenta, ki je do zdaj omogočil registracijo zelo nizkega števila ZTP (registriranih je dvajset posebnosti, trideset vlog pa se še obravnava); poudarja, da je treba seznam ZTP iz člena 3(2) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 509/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zajamčenih tradicionalnih posebnostih kmetijskih proizvodov in živil UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
Favours preserving and simplifying the TSG system; expresses disappointment at the performance of this instrument, under which so far only a small number of TSGs have been registered (20, with 30 applications pending); stresses that the register of TSGs mentioned second in Article 3(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p.
, pri katerem uporaba imena proizvoda ali živila ni pridržana izključno za proizvajalce, ki upoštevajo specifikacijo, odpraviti, saj slabi zaščito ZTP; opozarja, da predstavlja ureditev ZTP še vedno koristen instrument za zaščito mrež in da obstaja še veliko prostora za razvoj, če bodo izpolnjeni določeni pogoji;
– the register in which the name of the product or foodstuff is not reserved to the producers – should be abolished since this weakens TSG protection; recalls that the TSG system remains a useful instrument for protection of the networks and that it offers substantial room for development provided certain conditions are met;
meni, da je opredelitev pojma "tradicionalni" proizvod, kot ga navaja Uredba (ES) št. 509/2006, nezadostna; meni, da bi povezava med tradicionalnimi proizvodi in državo, v kateri se ta tradicija neguje, oziroma izključna uporaba te označbe s strani proizvajalcev, ki upoštevajo tradicionalne specifikacije, povečala vrednost statusa ZTP;
Considers the definition of "traditional" products contained in Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 to be inadequate; considers that association of a traditional product with the country in which the tradition exists or the exclusive use of the designation by producers complying with traditional requirements will make TSG status more attractive;
meni, da ima ekološka pridelava zelo velik potencial za rast kmetijstva EU ter da je treba prek programov za njeno spodbujanje krepiti verodostojnost logotipa EU; ugotavlja, da države članice postopek potrjevanja kljub enotnim standardom, ki jih določa uredba Skupnosti, sprejeta na tem področju, uporabljajo različno, tako da prenesejo drage nadzorne naloge po izbiri na nadzorne organe ali državno odobrene kontrolne organe; ugotavlja, da se postopek potrjevanja med državami članicami razlikuje in je drag; podpira usklajevanje pravnih predpisov o zgornjih mejnih vrednostih za prepovedana fitofarmacevtska sredstva v proizvodih ekološke pridelave; načelno podpira predlog za uvedbo oznake EU za ekološke proizvode;
Believes that organic farming offers EU farmers a major growth opportunity and that a programme of measures should be launched to enhance the credibility of the EU logo; notes, however, that the Community regulation on the subject lays down a single standard, even though the Member States apply the certification procedure differently, some of them choosing to delegate expensive inspection tasks to inspection authorities and others to state-accredited bodies; notes that the certification procedure varies between Member States and is expensive; calls for the harmonisation of legislation concerning upper detection limits of banned pesticides in organic products; supports, in principle, the proposal for an EU organic label;
meni, da je potrebna večja enotnost pri tipologiji organov in postopkov za nadzor in potrjevanje ekoloških proizvodov, da se potrošnikom zagotovita varnost in zaupanje z novim logotipom EU za proizvode ekološke pridelave, ki zagotavlja enotna merila za proizvodnjo, nadzor in potrjevanje na ravni EU in prispeva k reševanju težav ter okrepljeno spodbuja notranji trg za ekološke proizvode;
Takes the view that greater standardisation is needed in the typology of control and certification bodies and procedures for ecological products, so that consumers are provided with an assurance of safety and reliability in the form of a new EU logo for ecological agriculture, guaranteeing identical production, control and certification criteria at EU level and helping to resolve problems and further promote the internal market in ecological products;
meni, da bo označevanje proizvodov iz običajnega kmetijstva na način, ki bo vzbujal občutek, da ti proizvodi prihajajo iz ekološke pridelave, morda oviralo razvoj notranjega trga za ekološko pridelane proizvode v EU; zato izraža zaskrbljenost spričo prizadevanj za razširitev uporabe znaka za okolje tudi na živilske proizvode, ki niso proizvedeni v skladu z načeli ekološkega kmetijstva;
Considers that the appearance of non-organic products labelled in such a way as to suggest that they are products of organic farming may harm the development of a single EU market in organic products, expresses concern in this connection at attempts to extend the scope of the Ecolabel to food products not produced in accordance with organic farming principles;
priporoča, da je treba pri svežih ali predelanih proizvodih ekološke pridelave, uvoženih iz tretjih držav, obvezno navesti državo porekla, neodvisno od tega, ali se uporabi tudi znak EU za ekološke proizvode;
Advocates the compulsory indication of country of origin in the case of fresh and processed organic products imported from third countries independently of whether they bear EU organic production certification;
meni, da je za boljše delovanje notranjega trga za ekološke proizvode v EU treba:
Considers that, in order to improve the functioning of the internal market in organic products, it will be necessary to:
na svežih in predelanih ekoloških proizvodih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav, navesti državo porekla, neodvisno od tega, ali se uporabi tudi znak EU za ekološke proizvode,
register the country of origin in the case of fresh and processed organic products imported from third countries independently of whether the EU organic product logo is used,
okrepiti verodostojnost logotipa EU s programi za spodbujanje prodaje ekoloških proizvodov,
enhance the credibility of EU logo by means of a programme to promote organic products,
določiti najvišje mejne vrednosti za prepovedana fitofarmacevtska sredstva v proizvodih ekološke pridelave,
establish upper detection limits for banned pesticides in organic agricultural products,
preveriti problem dvojnega potrjevanja, ki ga v številnih primerih zahtevajo veliki trgovci na drobno, saj ovira zadostno razpoložljivost ekoloških proizvodov na trgu EU,
examine the question of dual certification required in many cases by major distributors, since this is resulting in a shortage of organic products on the EU market,
jasno razločevati označevanje nekmetijskih proizvodov, ki se nanaša na metodo ekološke pridelave, od označevanja kmetijskih proizvodov ekološke pridelave;
the designation of non-agricultural products referred to in connection with organic production methods must be distinct from that of organic agricultural products;
pozdravlja vzpostavitev služb za tradicionalne in ekološke proizvode na ravni držav članic; meni, da mora imeti vsaka država članica javne ali zasebne ustanove za preverjanje lokalne ekološke pridelave in kakovosti ter za promocijo, ki jih priznavajo proizvajalci in potrošniki;
Welcomes the creation at Member State level of offices for traditional and organic products; believes that every Member State should have bodies, whether public or private, that are universally recognised by producers and consumers for purposes of promoting and validating local organic and quality production;
priznava, da imajo potrošniki vedno večje zahteve glede kakovosti hrane in živil, ne zgolj glede varnosti, temveč tudi glede etičnih vprašanj, kot so okoljska trajnost, zaščita dobrega počutja živali in tehnologije gensko spremenjenih organizmov (GSO); poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi merila za pobude za kakovost, kot so prostovoljni sistemi označevanja izdelkov brez GSO, ki bodo potrošnikom zagotovili jasno izbiro;
Recognises that consumers have ever growing demands concerning the quality of food and food products, not only in terms of safety, but also in terms of ethical concerns, such as environmental sustainability, animal welfare protection and genetically modified organisms (GMO) technologies; calls on the Commission to provide criteria for quality initiatives such as voluntary GMO-free labelling schemes which will provide consumers with a clear choice;
meni, da je treba spodbujati okolju prijazne proizvodne postopke; zato obžaluje, da ni nobene ureditve Skupnosti za integrirano pridelavo, ki bi z ustreznimi informativnimi in trženjskimi kampanjami, ki poudarjajo dodano vrednost te oblike proizvodnje, omogočala opozarjanje na prizadevanja kmetov v EU;
Considers it necessary to promote environment-friendly production systems; regrets, therefore, the lack of Community rules on integrated production, enabling the efforts of EU producers to be highlighted, by means of suitable promotion and marketing campaigns designed to publicise the added value of those types of production;
meni, da predpisi EU za usklajevanje standardov niso potrebni; meni, da oblikovanje dodatnih shem za potrjevanje živil na ravni Skupnosti ni potrebno, saj bi to razvrednotilo že obstoječe sheme in zavajalo potrošnike;
Takes the view that EU rules on the harmonisation of standards are unnecessary; considers that there is no need to introduce new certification schemes for foodstuffs at EU level, as this would undermine existing schemes and mislead consumers;
poudarja, da razvoj oznak kakovosti, vključno s povezanimi dejavnostmi obveščanja, ne sme povzročiti zaostritve upravnih bremen za proizvajalce; v zvezi s tem želi, da bi imeli proizvajalci pri uporabi teh oznak kakovosti pravico do pobude, posegi organov Skupnosti pa bi bili omejeni na varstvo teh oznak kakovosti, kar zagotavlja, da proizvajalci za svoj trud prejmejo primerno nadomestilo in da so potrošniki zaščiteni pred ponaredki ali drugimi oblikami prevar;
Stresses that the development of quality marks, as well as the related communication activities, must not result in more red tape for producers; believes, therefore, that producers should be able to take the initiative regarding the use of such marks, and that the intervention of Community bodies should be confined to ensuring the protection of those marks with a view to guaranteeing producers a fair price for their efforts and protecting the consumer from counterfeiting or other forms of fraud;
poudarja, da bi obstoječi sistemi potrjevanja poleg upoštevanja zakonskih predpisov z natančnim nadzorom morali zagotavljati tudi druge pomembne elemente varnosti hrane, npr. sledljivost; poudarja, da bi morale zahteve za potrjevanje odražati zahteve družbe in je zato potrebna državna podpora za stroške, ki jih utrpijo kmetje; zagovarja spodbujanje dejavnega sodelovanja organizacij proizvajalcev, saj se posamezni kmetje ne morejo uspešno upirati odvečnim predpisom trgovine glede potrjevanja;
Stresses that existing certification systems, as well as ensuring compliance with legal rules by close monitoring, should also guarantee other important food safety factors such as traceability; stresses that certification requirements should reflect the demands of society and that there should therefore be state support for the costs incurred by farmers; advocates the promotion of more active cooperation by producers" associations, since individual farmers are unable to challenge obsolete trade certification rules;
opozarja, da zasebni sistemi potrjevanja proizvajalcev trenutno ne izpolnjujejo namena posredovati potrošnikom značilnosti zadevnih proizvodov, temveč so zgolj sredstvo za dostop do trga in s tem povečujejo birokratsko breme za kmete ter predstavljajo za številna živilska trgovska podjetja dober posel; meni, da se kopičenja teh sistemov potrjevanja ne sme spodbujati, saj za del proizvodnega sektorja predstavljajo omejevanje dostopa do trga;
Points out that, as things stand, private certification systems do not fulfil the objective of helping producers to communicate the characteristics of their products to consumers, and are in fact becoming an exclusive means of access to the market, increasing red tape for farmers and becoming a business for many food distribution companies; sees a need to refrain from promoting the proliferation of such systems, which limit access to the market to a section of the production sector;
opozarja, da sedanje kopičenje zasebnih sistemov potrjevanja ovira dostop do trga delu sektorja in da ti sistemi ne prispevajo k boljšemu posredovanju značilnosti proizvoda potrošniku; poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za vzajemno priznavanje zasebnih sistemov potrjevanja, da zajezi njihovo kopičenje in izključevanje kakovostnih proizvodov s trga; meni, da je treba izdelati smernice Skupnosti, ki bi zajemale vidike, katerih ti sistemi niso mogli urediti, kot so na primer navedbe, ki zvišujejo vrednost proizvoda, saj je te treba določati z objektivnimi lestvicami in podatki;
Stresses that the current proliferation of private certification systems is hindering access to the market for some in the sector, and that those systems are not helping to improve the communication of product characteristics to consumers; calls on the Commission to promote the mutual recognition of private certification systems in order to limit that proliferation and exclusion from the market of quality products; sees a need for Community guidelines to be drawn up that contain aspects those systems cannot regulate, such "status-enhancing" references, which should be defined on the basis of objective, scales and circumstances;
opozarja, da imajo regionalni proizvodi velik pomen za lokalno gospodarstvo in lokalne skupnosti, zato je treba zavrniti predloge, ki merijo na omejitev števila registriranih geografskih označb;
Points out that regional products are highly significant for local economies and communities and that therefore any proposals to limit the number of geographical indications which may be registered should be opposed;
meni, da ni treba pripravljati nikakršnih novih oblik spodbujanja tradicionalnih proizvodov, ki bi povzročile razvrednotenje sistema ZTP;
Considers that there is no need to develop new initiatives for promoting traditional products, as this may undermine the TSG scheme;
želi, da bi se okrepilo sodelovanje z Mednarodno organizacijo za standardizacijo (ISO) in razširilo izvajanje alternativnih sistemov, kot je sistem analize tveganj in kritičnih kontrolnih točk (HACCP);
Calls for closer cooperation with the International Organisation for Standardisation and the implementation on as large a scale as possible of alternative systems such as HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points);
opozarja, da je imela Evropska unija na mednarodni ravni s svojimi glavnimi trgovinskimi partnericami težave s konkurenco; izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi pritiska proizvodov iz držav v vzponu, ki ne dosegajo enake stopnje varnosti in kakovosti kot evropski proizvodi ter katerih nadzor je pogosto sporen; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je treba izvajati načelo upravičenega dostopa na trg, ki ga je Parlament priporočal v številnih resolucijah;
Notes, with regard to the international dimension, the existence of a number of problems relating to competitiveness vis-à-vis the European Union's main trading partners; is concerned at pressure from products from emerging countries which do not meet the same security and quality standards and often benefit from lax controls; reiterates, in this connection, the need to implement the concept of 'qualified market access', as affirmed in numerous resolutions of Parliament;
poziva k sklenitvi številnejših dvostranskih sporazumov s ključnimi trgi in sporazumov o boju proti ponarejanju; poziva Komisijo, naj sodeluje pri reševanju vprašanja mednarodne zaščite blagovnih znamk, pa tudi ZGO, ZOP in ZTP;
Calls for the generalisation of bilateral agreements with key markets, as well as for agreements on fighting counterfeiting; believes that the Commission should work for clarification of the issues facing international trademark protection, including protection of PGIs, PDOs and TSGs;
meni, da je treba javnost bolje seznanjati o prednostih politike EU za zagotavljanja kakovosti in varnosti hrane; izraža obžalovanje, da evropski državljani nimajo enostavnega dostopa do obširnih informacij o prispevku Evropske unije na tem področju; priporoča Komisiji in državam članicam, naj okrepijo svoja prizadevanja za širjenje informacij in spodbujanje standardov kakovosti in varnosti hrane, ki veljajo za proizvode iz EU;
Supports action to communicate, as extensively as possible, the benefits of the European Union's policies for food quality and safety; regrets the lack of full information and the difficulties of access for the public regarding the European Union's work in this field; recommends that the Commission and the Member States step up their information and promotion efforts regarding quality and food safety standards for EU products;
poudarja vlogo, ki jo lahko ima financiranje Skupnosti; ugotavlja, da znaša v konvergenčnih državah članicah prispevek Skupnosti za programe izboljšanja kakovosti do 75 %; opozarja, da so se zaradi svetovne finančne krize kreditni pogoji za male proizvajalce zaostrili, kar bo znatno omejilo dostop teh proizvajalcev do sofinanciranja;
Emphasises the potential role of EU funding in this area; notes that in the 'convergence Member States' Community participation in the quality programmes is as high as 75 %; nonetheless stresses that credit requirements have now become tighter for small producers in the wake of the world financial crisis, and that this will drastically limit their access to cofinancing;
meni, da je treba spodbujati nastajanje kmečkih tržnic, mest, kjer kmetijska podjetja neposredno prodajajo regionalne in sezonske proizvode v lastni režiji, saj zagotavljajo pravične cene in visokokakovostne proizvode, krepijo povezavo proizvoda z območjem pridelave in osveščajo potrošnike za zavestno izbiro glede na vidike kakovosti; meni, da bi morale države članice spodbujati nastajanje prodajnih lokacij, na katerih bi lahko proizvajalci svoje proizvode ponujali neposredno potrošniku;
Considers that farmers' markets, as outlets for local, seasonal produce run directly by farmers, should be encouraged because they ensure that a fair price is paid for high-quality produce, strengthen the link between product and place of production and encourage consumers to make informed, quality-based choices; considers that Member States should encourage the creation of marketing spaces in which producers can present their products direct to the consumer;
predlaga vzpostavitev programov za spodbujanje prodaje za lokalne trge, da bi podprli lokalne in regionalne pobude za predelavo in trženje; meni, da je to mogoče doseči na primer z organizacijami proizvajalcev, ki povečujejo ustvarjanje vrednosti na podeželskih območjih in ki s preprečevanjem dolgih prevozov dajejo dober zgled za boj proti podnebnim spremembam;
Calls for the creation of sales promotion programmes for local markets, to promote local and regional processing and marketing initiatives; takes the view that this could for example be done by producer cooperatives, which boost added value in rural areas and which by avoiding long transport routes set a good example for combating climate change;
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2006 z dne 25. junija 2007 ( KOM(2007)0358 ) in poročila Komisije o politiki konkurence za leto 2007 z dne 16. junija 2008 ( KOM(2008)0368 ),
having regard to the Commission Report on Competition Policy 2006 of 25 June 2007 ( COM(2007)0358 ) and its Report on Competition Policy 2007 of 16 June 2008 ( COM(2008)0368 ),
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta Komisije državnih pomoči z dne 7. junija 2005 z naslovom "Manjša in bolje usmerjena državna pomoč: časovni načrt za reformo državnih pomoči 2005–2009" ( KOM(2005)0107 ),
having regard to the Commission State Aid Action Plan of 7 June 2005 on Less and better targeted state aid: a roadmap for state aid reform 2005-2009 ( COM(2005)0107 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. februarja 2006 o reformi državnih pomoči 2005–2009 UL C 290 E, 29.11.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 14 February 2006 on State aid reform 2005-2009 OJ C 290 E, 29.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1998/2006 z dne 15. decembra 2006 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe pri pomoči
having regard to the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1998/2006 of 15 December 2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to
UL L 379, 28.12.2006, str.
aid OJ L 379, 28.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 800/2008 z dne 6. avgusta 2008 o razglasitvi nekaterih vrst pomoči za združljive s skupnim trgom z uporabo členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe (Uredba o splošnih skupinskih izjemah) UL L 214, 9.8.2008, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 of 6 August 2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General block exemption Regulation) OJ L 214, 9.8.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1400/2002 z dne 31. julija 2002 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za skupine vertikalnih sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj na področju motornih vozil UL L 203, 1.8.2002, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector OJ L 203, 1.8.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za obdobje 2007–2013 UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
having regard to the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1627/2006 z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 794/2004 glede standardnih obrazcev za priglasitev pomoči UL L 302, 1.11.2006, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1627/2006 of 24 October 2006 amending Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 as regards the standard forms for notification of aid OJ L 302, 1.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju okvira Skupnosti za državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije UL C 323, 30.12.2006, str.
having regard to the Community Framework for State aid for Research and Development and Innovation OJ C 323, 30.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja UL C 82, 1.4.2008, str.
having regard to the Community Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection OJ C 82, 1.4.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju osnutka smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči za spodbujanje naložb tveganega kapitala v mala in srednje velika podjetja UL C 194, 18.8.2006, str.
having regard to the Community Guidelines on State aid to promote risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises OJ C 194, 18.8.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o podaljšanju okvira za državno pomoč ladjedelništvu UL C 173, 8.7.2008, str.
having regard to the Commission Communication concerning the prolongation of the Framework on State aid to shipbuilding OJ C 173, 8.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju obvestila Komisije o uporabi člena 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES za državno pomoč v obliki poroštev UL C 155, 20.6.2008, str.
having regard to the Commission Notice on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid in the form of guarantees OJ C 155, 20.6.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o spremembi metode določanja referenčnih obrestnih mer in diskontnih stopenj UL C 14, 19.1.2008, str.
having regard to the Commission Communication on the revision of the method for setting the reference and discount rates OJ C 14, 19.1.2008, p.