natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predsednik Evropskega parlamenta je v pismu z dne 26. aprila 2011 naš odbor zaprosil za sprejetje ustreznih nadaljnjih korakov v zvezi s temi sklepi.
By letter of the 26 April 2011 the President of the European Parliament asked our committee to ensure the appropriate follow-up of those decisions.
Poročevalec meni, da je treba zadnji stavek člena 48(2) ustrezno spremeniti, saj je v priporočilih, ki jih je sprejela konferenca predsednikov, predlagano, da bi sklep o tem, ali je samoiniciativno poročilo strateško poročilo v smislu zadnjega stavka člena 48(2) Poslovnika sprejela konferenca predsednikov v fazi odobritve, in sicer z bolj politično razlago sklepa konference predsednikov z dne 12. decembra 2002, kot je bil spremenjen (Priloga XVIII Poslovnika).
As the recommendations adopted by the Conference of Presidents considers that " the decision on whether an INI report is strategic or not in the sense of the last sentence of Rule 48(2) of the Rules of Procedure shall be carried out (...) by the Conference of Presidents at the authorisation stage by using a more political interpretation of the Decision of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2002 as amended (Annex XVIII of the Rules of Procedure)" your rapporteur considers that the last sentence of Rule 48 (2) should be adapted accordingly.
Glede vprašanja, ali bi se morala člena 163 in 167 uporabljati za samoiniciativna poročila, je poročilo vsebuje mnenje, da bi se moralo dovoliti glasovanje po delih samo za samoiniciativna poročila, ki so omenjena v zadnjem stavku člena 48(2).
Regarding the question of whether Rules 163 and 167 should apply to INI reports, the report considers that split vote should be allowed only for own-initiative reports referred to in the last sentence of Rule 48(2)..
Poimensko glasovanje se lahko zahteva samo pri končnem glasovanju, z izjemo poročil iz zadnjega stavka člena 48(2).
Request for roll call vote should only be allowed for the final vote, with the exception of the reports referred to in the last sentence of Rule 48(2).
Ker Priloga XVIII Poslovnika povzema sklep konference predsednikov z dne 12. decembra 2002, poročevalec meni, da je za spremembo te priloge pristojna konferenca predsednikov, odbor AFCO pa je lahko z njenim sklepom le seznanjen in naroči generalnemu sekretarju, naj prilogo ustrezno prilagodi.
Finally, as Annex XVIII of the Rules of Procedure reproduce a decision of the Conference of Presidents of 12 December 2002, your rapporteur considers that the modification of this Annex is of the competence of the Conference of Presidents and therefore AFCO can only take note of the decision taken and instruct the Secretary General to adapt the Annex accordingly.
Poročevalec želi to poročilo izkoristiti tudi za to, da generalnemu sekretarju naroči, naj v skladu s prejšnjim sklepom Parlamenta prilagodi Prilogo VXIII.
He also takes the chance of this report to instruct the Secretary General to adapt Annex XVIII in accordance with a previous Parliament decision.
Andrew Henry William Brons, Carlo Casini, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Giuseppe Gargani, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Gerald Häfner, Daniel Hannan, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Paulo Rangel, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, József Szájer, Rafał Trzaskowski
Andrew Henry William Brons, Carlo Casini, Andrew Duff, Ashley Fox, Giuseppe Gargani, Matthias Groote, Roberto Gualtieri, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Gerald Häfner, Daniel Hannan, Stanimir Ilchev, Constance Le Grip, Morten Messerschmidt, Paulo Rangel, Algirdas Saudargas, György Schöpflin, József Szájer, Rafał Trzaskowski
John Stuart Agnew, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Dimitrios Drucas (Dimitrios Droutsas), Marietta Gianaku (Marietta Giannakou), Alain Lamassoure, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo
John Stuart Agnew, Zuzana Brzobohatá, Dimitrios Droutsas, Marietta Giannakou, Alain Lamassoure, Íñigo Méndez de Vigo
Marek Siwiec in Mário David
Marek Siwiec and Mário David
MNENJE Odbora za proračun .....................................................................................28
OPINION of the Committee on Budgets .................................................................27
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................32
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............31
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................37
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............36
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................42
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................41
MNENJE Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ..................................................46
OPINION of the Committee on Culture and Education ................................45
MNENJE Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve 51
OPINION of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs 50
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................54
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................54
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................57
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................57
o pregledu evropske sosedske politike
on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy
– ob upoštevanju skupnih poročil Komisije in visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko o novem odzivu na spremembe v sosedstvu ( KOM(2011)0303 ) z dne 25. maja 2011 in o partnerstvu za demokracijo in skupno blaginjo z državami južnega Sredozemlja ( KOM(2011)0200 ) z dne 8. marca 2011,
– having regard to the Joint Communications of the Commission and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 25 May 2011 on A new response to a changing Neighbourhood ( COM(2011)0303 ) and of 8 March 2011 on A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the Southern Mediterranean ( COM(2011)0200 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije z dne 11. marca 2003 z naslovom „Razširjena Evropa – sosedstvo: nov okvir za odnose EU z njenimi vzhodnimi in južnimi sosedami ( KOM(2003)0104 ), o evropski sosedski politiki – strateški dokument z dne 12. maja 2004 ( KOM(2004)0373 ), o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike z dne 4. decembra 2006( KOM(2006)0726 ), o močni evropski sosedski politiki z dne 5. decembra 2007 ( KOM(2007)0774 ), o vzhodnemu partnerstvu z dne 3. decembra 2008 ( KOM(2008)0823 ), o barcelonskem procesu: Unija za Sredozemlje z dne 20. maja 2008 ( KOM(2008)0319 ), o pregledu evropske sosedske politike (ESP) z dne 12. maja 2010 ( KOM(2010)0207 ) in o dialogu o migracijah, mobilnosti in varnosti z državami južnega Sredozemlja z dne 24. maja 2011 ( KOM(2011)0292 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communications of 11 March 2003 on Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours ( COM(2003)0104 ), of 12 May 2004 on European Neighbourhood Policy - Strategy Paper ( COM(2004)0373 ), of 4 December 2006 on Strengthening the ENP ( COM(2006)0726 ), of 5 December 2007 on A Strong European Neighbourhood Policy ( COM(2007)0774 ), of 3 December 2008 on Eastern Partnership ( COM(2008)0823 ), of 20 May 2008 on The Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean ( COM(2008)0319 ), of 12 May 2010 on Taking Stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) ( COM(2010)0207 ) and of 24 May 2011 on ‘A dialogue for migration, mobility and security with the southern Mediterranean countries’ ( COM(2011)0292 ),
– ob upoštevanju razvoja evropske sosedske politike od leta 2004, zlasti poročil Komisije o napredku na področju njenega izvajanja,
– having regard to the development of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) since 2004, and in particular to the Commission’s progress reports on its implementation,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskih načrtov, sprejetih z Egiptom, Izraelom, Jordanijo, Libanonom, Marokom, Palestinsko upravo, Tunizijo, Armenijo, Azerbajdžanom, Gruzijo in Moldavijo ter pridružitvenega načrta, sprejetega z Ukrajino,
– having regard to the Action Plans adopted jointly with Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Morocco, the Palestinian Authority and Tunisia, and Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Moldova, and to the Association Agenda with Ukraine,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zunanje zadeve o evropski sosedski politiki z dne 26. julija 2010 in 20. junija 2011 ter sklepov Sveta za zunanje zadeve/trgovino z dne 26. septembra 2011,
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council conclusions on ENP of 26 July 2010 and 20 June 2011 and to the Foreign Affairs Council (Trade) conclusions of 26 September 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov s seje zunanjih ministrov vzhodnega partnerstva z dne 13. decembra 2010,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Eastern Partnership (EaP) Foreign Ministers’ meeting of 13 December 2010,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave z vrhunskega srečanja o vzhodnem partnerstvu, ki je potekalo v Pragi 7. maja 2009, in skupne izjave z vrhunskega srečanja o vzhodnem partnerstvu, ki je potekalo v Varšavi 29. in 30. septembra 2011,
– having regard to the Joint Declarations of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit of 7 May 2009 and of the Warsaw Eastern Partnership summit of 29-30 September 2011,
– ob upoštevanju barcelonske deklaracije o ustanovitvi evro-sredozemskega partnerstva, sprejete na evro-sredozemski konferenci ministrov za zunanje zadeve, ki je potekala v Barceloni 27. in 28. novembra 1995,
– having regard to the Barcelona Declaration establishing a Euro-Mediterranean Partnership adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Ministers of Foreign Affairs held on 27 and 28 November 1995,
– ob upoštevanju soglasja k barcelonskemu procesu: Unija za Sredozemlje s strani Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 13. in 14. marca 2008,
– having regard to the approval of the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean (UfM) by the Brussels European Council of 13 and 14 March 2008,
– ob upoštevanju izjave z vrhunskega srečanja za Sredozemlje, ki je potekalo 13. julija 2008 v Parizu,
– having regard to the Declaration of the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean, held in Paris on 13 July 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov pridružitvenega sveta EU-Maroko z dne 13. oktobra 2008, ki je Maroku podelil prednostni status,
– having regard to the conclusions of the EU-Morocco Association Council of 13 October 2008, which granted advanced status to Morocco ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov pridružitvenega sveta EU-Jordanija z dne 26. oktobra 2010, ki je Jordaniji podelil prednostni status,
– having regard to the conclusions of the EU-Jordan Association Council of 26 October 2010, which granted advanced status to Jordan ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje pisne izjave št. 15/2011 z dne 27. septembra 2011 o oblikovanju evro-sredozemskih programov Erasmus in Leonardo da Vinci,
– having regard to its Written Declaration No 15/2011 of 27 September 2011 on the establishment of Euro-Mediterranean Erasmus and Leonardo da Vinci programmes,
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 13/2010 „Ali se je novi evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva na Južnem Kavkazu (Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Gruzija) začel uspešno izvajati in ali prinaša rezultate?“,
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special Report No 13/2010, entitled ‘Is the new European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument successfully launched and achieving results in the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia)?’,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2011/424/SZVP z dne 18. julija 2011 o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za regijo južnega Sredozemlja
– having regard to Council Decision 2011/424/CFSP of 18 July 2011 appointing a European Union Special Representative for the Southern Mediterranean region
UL L 188, 19.7.2011. in Sklepa Sveta 2011/518/SZVP z dne 25. avgusta 2011 o imenovanju posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije za Južni Kavkaz in za krizo v Gruziji
OJ L 188, 19.7.2011. and Council Decision 2011/518/CFSP of 25 August 2011 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia
UL L 211, 27.8.2011. ,
OJ L 211, 27.8.2011. ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij o pregledu evropske sosedske politike – vzhodna dimenzija in pregledu evropske sosedske politike – južni sklop z dne 7. aprila 2011 ( B7-0198/2011 in B7-0199/2011 ),
– having regard to its resolutions on Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy – Eastern Dimension and on Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy – Southern Dimension of 7 April 2011 ( B7-0198/2011 and B7-0199/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucij o evropski sosedski politiki (ESP) z dne 19. januarja 2006
– having regard to its resolutions of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP)
UL C 287 E, 19.1.2006, str.
OJ C 287 E, 19.1.2006, p.
312. , o krepitvi ESP z dne 15. novembra 2007
312. , of 15 November 2007 on strengthening the ENP
443. , o Evropskem sosedskem in partnerskem instrumentu (ENPI) z dne 6. julija 2006
443. , of 6 July 2006 on the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument
760. , o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih usmeritvah SZVP z dne 5. junija 2008
760. , of 5 June 2008 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP
11. , o pregledu Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva z dne 19. februarja 2009
11. , of 19 February 2009 on the review of the ENPI
83. , o barcelonskem procesu: Unija za Sredozemlje
83. , of 19 February 2009 on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean
76. , o pristopu k regionalni politiki za Črno morje z dne 17. januarja 2008
76. , of 17 January 2008 on a Black Sea Regional Policy Approach
64. , o strategiji EU za Črno morje z dne 20. januarja 2011
64. , of 20 January 2011 on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0025 . , o Uniji za Sredozemlje z dne 20. maja 2010
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0025 . , of 20 May 2010 on the Union for the Mediterranean
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0192 . , o nujnosti evropske strategije za južni Kavkaz z dne 20. maja 2010
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0192 . , of 20 May 2010 on the Need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0193 . , o stanju reke Jordan s posebnim poudarkom na območju njenega spodnjega toka z dne 9. septembra 2010
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0193 . , of 9 September 2010 on the situation of the Jordan River, with special regard to the Lower Jordan River area
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0314 . , o razmerah v Tuniziji z dne 3. februarja 2011
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0314 . , of 3 February 2011 on the situation in Tunisia
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0038 . , o razmerah v Egiptu z dne 17. februarja 2011
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0038 . , of 17 February 2011 on the situation in Egypt
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0064 . , o južnem sosedstvu, zlasti Libiji, vključno s humanitarnimi vidiki z dne 10. marca 2011
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0064 . , of 10 March 2011 on the Southern Neighbourhood, and Libya in particular, including humanitarian aspects
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0095 . , o Siriji, Jemnu in Bahrajnu glede na splošne razmere v arabskem svetu in Severni Afriki z dne 7. julija 2011, o razmerah v Belorusiji in vseh prejšnjih resolucij o Belorusiji z dne 15. septembra 2011 in 20. januarja 2011, in o razmerah v Libiji
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0095 . and of 7 July 2011 on Syria, Yemen and Bahrain in the context of the situation in the Arab World and North Africa, of 15 September 2011 and of 20 January 2011 on the situation in Belarus and all its previous resolutions on Belarus, and of 15 September 2011 on the situation in Libya
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0386 . in razmerah v Siriji z dne 15. septembra
Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0386 . and the situation in Syria
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0387 . ,
Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0387 . ,
– ob upoštevanju priporočil , ki so jih sprejeli odbori parlamentarne skupščine Unije za Sredozemlje na sedmem plenarnem zasedanju, ki je potekalo v Rimu 3. in 4. marca 2011,
– having regard to the recommendations adopted by the committees of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (PA-UfM) at its seventh plenary session, held in Rome on 3 and 4 March 2011,
– ob upoštevanju ustanovnega akta parlamentarne skupščine evropske sosedske politike za vzhod (EURONEST) z dne 3. maja 2011,
– having regard to the Constituent Act of the EU-Neighbourhood East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST) of 3 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov ustanovne seje Evro-sredozemske regionalne in lokalne skupščine v Barceloni z dne 21. januarja 2010,
– having regard to the conclusions of the inaugural meeting of the Euro ‑Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly (ARLEM) held in Barcelona on 21 January 2010,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije o kulturnih razsežnostih zunanjega delovanja EU ( 2010/2161(INI) )
– having regard to its resolution on the Cultural dimensions of the EU’s external actions ( 2010/2161(INI) )
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0239 . ,
Text adopted, P7_TA(2011)0239 . ,
– ob upoštevanju evropske agende za kulturo v svetu globalizacije ( KOM(2007)0242 ),
– having regard to the European Agenda for Culture in a Globalising World ( COM(2007)0242 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 8 in 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 8 and 21 of the Treaty on European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora zunanje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za razvoj, Odbora za proračun, Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za regionalni razvoj, Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje, Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0400/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Development, the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Regional Development, the Committee on Culture and Education, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0400/2011 ),
A. ker so spoštovanje in spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic –, zlasti pravic žensk, otrok in manjšin – pravice ter pravne države, temeljnih svoboščin – in s tem svobode govora, vesti, veroizpovedi, spolne usmerjenosti, združevanja in medijev,vključno z neomejenim dostopom do informacij, komunikacij in interneta, krepitev civilne družbe, varnost – vključno z mirnim reševanjem sporov in dobrimi sosedskimi odnosi –, demokratična stabilnost, blaginja, pravična porazdelitev dohodka, bogastva in možnosti, socialna kohezija, boj proti korupciji in spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja in trajnostnega razvoja temeljna načela in cilji Evropske unije, ki morajo sestavljati skupne vrednote in biti v središču pregleda evropske sosedske politike;
A. whereas respect for and promotion of democracy and human rights – particularly women’s, children’s and minority rights – justice and the rule of law, fundamental freedoms – including freedom of speech, conscience, religion or belief, sexual orientation, association and the media, including unrestricted access to information, communication and internet – strengthening of civil society, security – including peaceful conflict resolution and good neighbourly relations -, democratic stability, prosperity, the fair distribution of income, wealth and opportunities, social cohesion, the fight against corruption and the promotion of good governance and sustainable development are founding principles and aims of the EU which must constitute common values at the core of the ENP review;
B. ker je v največjem interesu EU, da ima visoke cilje glede gospodarskega sodelovanja in da sprejme strategijo, ki bo v obojestransko korist, odgovorna in prilagodljiva ter bo temeljila na podpori demokratičnega prehoda in zaščite človekovih pravic, pri čemer se mora učiti iz neuspehov in napak politike EU in držav članic, zlasti glede samozadovoljnega pristopa do avtoritarnih režimov v južnem sosedstvu, katerega izkušnje kažejo, da mora celotna evropska sosedska politika temeljiti na vrednosti;
B. whereas it is in the highest interest of the EU to be ambitious in economic cooperation and adopt a mutually beneficial, responsible and flexible strategy based on support for democratic transitions and defence of human rights, learning from the failures and the mistakes of EU and Member States’ policy with regard, in particular, to the complacent approach towards the authoritarian regimes of the Southern neighbourhood, from which the lesson has been learnt that the overall EU-ENP should be value-based;
C. ker bi morali v teh novih razmerah dati nov zagon odnosom s temi državami na podlagi sodelovanja, ki se osredotoča na demokracijo in blaginjo na obeh straneh Sredozemskega morja in ne le na varnost in nadzor migracij;
C. whereas, in this new context, relations with these countries should be given fresh impetus, based on cooperation focusing on democracy and prosperity on both shores of the Mediterranean , and not only security and migration control;
D. ker je bila Unija za Sredozemlje ustanovljena z ambicioznim ciljem, da postane trajni instrument za krepitev odnosov z državami južnega sosedstva, ki nadomešča nekdanji barcelonski proces z namenom okrepiti prizadevanja v okviru tega procesa in njihovo vidnost;
D. whereas the Union for the Mediterranean was established with the ambitious objective of being a permanent instrument for strengthening relations with the Southern neighbourhood countries, replacing the former Barcelona Process with the intention of reinforcing and raising the profile of its work;
E. ker je sodelovanje v okviru parlamentarne skupščine EURONEST, ki deluje kot platforma za izmenjavo mnenj, namenjena doseganju pozitivnih učinkov, iskanju skupnih stališč glede svetovnih izzivov našega časa, povezanih z demokracijo, politiko, ekonomijo, zanesljivostjo oskrbe z energijo in socialnimi zadevami, in krepitvi vezi med državami v regiji in z EU;
E. whereas the cooperation in the framework of the EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly aims at bringing positive effects by serving as a platform to exchange views, find common positions on global challenges of our times with respect to democracy, politics, economics, energy security, and social affairs, as well as strengthen ties between the countries of the region and with the EU;
F. ker člen 49 PDEU določa, da vsaka evropska država, ki spoštuje vrednote, na katerih temelji EU, in sicer demokracijo, vladavino prava ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, in se zavzema za spodbujanje teh vrednot, lahko zaprosi za članstvo v Uniji,
F. whereas Article 49 of the TFEU stipulates that any European State which respects the values the EU is based upon, namely democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and is committed to promoting them, may apply to become a member of the Union;
G. ker je za poglobljene odnose potrebno skleniti jasne in preizkušene zaveze k reformam, s katerimi bi dosegli opazen napredek pri izpolnjevanju vnaprej določenih meril,
G. whereas strengthened relations require a clear and proven commitment towards reform with the aim of making tangible progress in fulfilment of predefined benchmarks;
H. ker bi se EU za uresničitev svojih prizadevanj in glede na dogodke v tej regiji morala opremiti s prožnimi in ustrezno financiranimi instrumenti ter pri tem prednostno upoštevati optimalno uporabo obstoječih finančnih instrumentov;
H. whereas the EU should provide itself with flexible and properly funded instruments in order to match its ambitions and events in the regions, emphasising optimum use of existing financial instruments;