natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker se trenutno v EU ne izvaja nobeno celovito, stalno in jasno spremljanje politik EU na področju kazenskega prava niti kakovosti in učinkovitosti sodstva,
whereas no comprehensive, constant and clear monitoring of EU policies in the field of criminal justice, or of the quality and efficiency of justice, is currently in place within the EU,
ker bi bilo takšno spremljanje bistvenega pomena za tiste, ki v EU sprejemajo odločitve, kadar pripravljajo najprimernejše zakonodajne ukrepe, obenem pa bi povečalo vzajemno zaupanje v sodne sisteme,
whereas such monitoring would be fundamental for the "EU decision-makers" when conceiving the most appropriate legislative actions while at the same time enhancing mutual trust in each other's judicial systems,
ker bi moral ta sistem ocenjevanja črpati iz obstoječih sistemov ocenjevanja, ne da bi podvajal prizadevanja in rezultate, Parlamentu pa bi moral nameniti aktivno vlogo,
whereas that evaluation system should take stock of existing evaluation systems without duplicating effort or results, and should give an active role to Parliament,
ker bi lahko novoustanovljeni forum za pravosodje pomembno prispeval v fazi predhodnega ocenjevanja zakonodajnih pobud EU,
whereas the newly established "Justice Forum" might make an important contribution to the ex-ante evaluation stage of EU legislative initiatives,
ker bi bilo treba zaradi zagotavljanja skladnosti in doslednosti ukrepanja EU, obenem pa zaradi varovanja temeljnih pravic, s primernimi postopki, ki naj vključujejo presoje vpliva, vzpostaviti javni posvetovalni postopek, še preden Komisija ali države članice vložijo predloge ali pobude za sprejetje zakonodajnih instrumentov EU,
whereas, in order to ensure coherence and consistency in EU action while at the same time safeguarding fundamental rights, a public consultation process through the appropriate procedures, including impact assessments, should take place before proposals and initiatives for the adoption of EU legislative instruments are tabled by the Commission or the Member States,
ker stalne izmenjave informacij, praks in izkušenj med pravosodnimi organi v državah članicah bistveno prispevajo k razvoju okolja, ki temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju, kar dokazujejo izjemni rezultati, doseženi s programom izmenjav med pravosodnimi organi,
whereas a constant exchange of information, practices and experience among judicial authorities in the Member States makes a fundamental contribution to the development of an environment built on mutual trust, as the remarkable results achieved with the exchange programme for judicial authorities show,
ker na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah še vedno manjka primeren celovit sistem varstva podatkov in je v njegovi odsotnosti treba v vsakem posameznem zakonodajnem instrumentu skrbno regulirati pravice oseb, na katere se podatki nanašajo,
whereas an adequate overall data protection regime is still lacking in the area of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and in its absence the rights of data subjects need to be carefully regulated in each individual legislative instrument,
ker je vloga nacionalnih sodstev v boju proti mednarodnemu kriminalu in pri varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin vse pomembnejša,
whereas the role of national judiciaries is becoming more and more relevant in fighting trans-national crime and, at the same time, in protecting fundamental rights and freedoms,
ker so usklajevalna telesa, kot je Eurojust, pokazala, da prispevajo resnično dodano vrednost, njihovi ukrepi proti mednarodnemu kriminalu pa so se izjemno razširili, čeprav so njihove pristojnosti še vedno preveč omejene in so nekatere države članice izkazale odpor do izmenjave informacij v tem okviru,
whereas coordination bodies such as Eurojust have been shown to contribute a real added value and their action against trans-national crime has expanded remarkably despite the fact that their powers are still too limited and some Member States have proved reluctant to share information in this context,
ker je usklajevanje zagovornikov pomanjkljivo in bi ga bilo treba podpreti in odobriti na ravni EU,
whereas coordination for defence lawyers is lacking and should therefore be supported and endorsed at EU level,
ker so mafijske združbe in splošni organizirani kriminal postali nadnacionalni pojav, ki ima družbeni, kulturni, gospodarski in politični učinek na države članice in sosednje države, proti njemu pa se je treba bojevati tudi na družbeni ravni v sodelovanju s civilno družbo in demokratičnimi ustanovami,
whereas mafias and organised crime in general have become a transnational phenomenon having a social, cultural, economic and political impact on Member States and neighbouring countries, needing to be combated also at the social level, in cooperation with civil society and democratic institutions,
naj, ob upoštevanju, da mora kazenskopravno območje EU temeljiti na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, nadaljuje delo v zvezi z varovanjem temeljnih pravic in naj zlasti nemudoma sprejme:
in view of the fact that an EU criminal justice area must be based on respect for fundamental rights, restart working on safeguarding fundamental rights and notably adopt without delay:
ambiciozen pravni instrument, ki naj temelji na načelu domneve nedolžnosti, o postopkovnih zaščitnih ukrepih v kazenskopravnem postopku, kot so pravica do "obvestila o pravicah", pravica do pravnega nasveta, po potrebi pravica do brezplačnega pravnega nasveta pred in med sojenjem, pravica do navedbe dokazov, pravica do obveščenosti o naravi obtožbe ali razlogih za sum in sicer v jeziku, ki ga osumljenec/obtoženec razume, pravica do dostopa do vseh zadevnih dokumentov v jeziku, ki ga osumljenec/obtoženec razume, pravica do tolmača, pravica do sojenja in pravica do obrambe, zaščita osumljencev/obtožencev, ki ne razumejo postopka ali mu ne morejo slediti, minimalni standardi za pridržanje in pogoje za mladoletne osumljence/obtožence ter njihovo zaščito ter učinkoviti in dostopni mehanizmi odškodnine za posameznike,
an ambitious legal instrument on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings, based on the principle of presumption of innocence, such as the right to a "Letter of Rights", the right to legal advice, the right to free legal advice when necessary, both before and during the trial, the right to adduce evidence, the right to be informed in a language understandable by the suspect/defendant of the nature of and/or the reasons for the charges and/or of the grounds for suspicion, the right of access to all relevant documents in a language which the suspect/defendant understands, the right to an interpreter, the right to a hearing and the right of defence, protection of suspects/defendants who cannot understand or follow the proceedings, minimum standards for detention, conditions and protection of juvenile suspects/defendants as well as effective and accessible mechanisms of redress for individuals,
celovit pravni okvir, ki bo žrtvam kaznivih dejanj ponujal najširše varstvo, vključno z ustreznim nadomestilom in zaščito prič, še posebej, ko gre za zadeve, povezane z organiziranim kriminalom,
a comprehensive legal framework offering victims of crime the widest protection, including adequate compensation and witness protection, notably in organised crime cases,
pravni instrument o dopustnosti dokazov v kazenskih postopkih,
a legal instrument on the admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings,
ukrepe za določitev minimalnih standardov glede pogojev v zaporih in priporu ter skupen niz pravic zapornikov v EU, ki naj med drugim vključuje pravico do komunikacije in konzularno pomoč,
measures to fix minimum standards for prison and detention conditions and a common set of prisoners' rights in the EU, including, among others, the right of communication and consular assistance,
ukrepe za delovanje kot glavna gonilna sila in podpornik civilne družbe in institucij pri njihovem prizadevanju za boj proti mafijskim združbam ter ukrepa s ciljem sprejetja zakonodajnega instrumenta o zaplembi finančnih sredstev in premoženja mednarodnih kriminalnih organizacij ter o njihovi uporabi za socialne namene;
measures to act as prime mover and supporter of civil society and institutions in their efforts to combat mafias and take action with a view to the adoption of a legislative instrument on confiscation of the financial assets and property of international criminal organisations and on their re-use for social purposes;
glede na to, da je načelo vzajemnega priznavanja temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, naj čim prej sprejme tiste pravne instrumente EU, ki so še potrebni za njegovo celovito izvajanje, ter zagotovi razvoj enakovrednih standardov procesnih pravic in zbliževanje minimalnih pravil o vidikih kazenskega postopka;
given that the principle of mutual recognition is the cornerstone on which judicial cooperation in criminal matters is based, adopt without delay those EU legal instruments still needed to complete its implementation, as well as ensure the development of equivalent standards for procedural rights and the approximation of minimum rules concerning aspects of criminal procedure;
naj skupaj z državami članicami učinkovito izvaja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja na kazenskopravnem območju, pri čemer naj ustrezno pozornost nameni težavam in dosežkom pri izvajanju in vsakodnevni uporabi evropskega naloga za prijetje, ter zagotovi, da države članice pri uporabi tega načela spoštujejo temeljne pravice in splošna načela prava, kot jih določa člen 6 Pogodbe EU;
effectively implement, together with the Member States, the mutual recognition principle in the area of criminal justice, giving due attention to difficulties and achievements in the implementation and daily application of the European Arrest Warrant, and making sure that in the application of the principle by the Member States they respect fundamental rights and the general principles of law as established in Article 6 of the EU Treaty;
naj pozove države članice, da pri izvajanju okvirnega sklepa o evropskem nalogu za prijetje uporabijo načelo sorazmernosti, ter opozarja na druge pravne instrumente, kot so zaslišanja z uporabo tehnike videokonference, ki se v nekaterih primerih lahko izkažejo za primerne ob uporabi ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov;
call on the Member States to apply the proportionality principle while implementing the framework decision on the European Arrest Warrant and draw attention to other legal instruments such as hearings by videoconference which might prove to be appropriate in specific cases with appropriate safeguards;
naj v sodelovanju s Parlamentom oceni sedanje stanje na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah v Evropski uniji, pri čemer naj upošteva tako pomanjkljivosti kot napredek;
take stock, in cooperation with Parliament, of the current state of judicial cooperation in criminal matters within the European Union, considering both shortcomings and progress;
naj skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom oblikuje odbor modrecev (pravnikov), ki bi imel nalogo, da pripravi študijo o podobnostih in razlikah med sistemi kazenskega prava vseh držav članic ter predložil predloge za razvoj kazenskopravnega območja EU, ki bi uravnovesilo učinkovitost kazenskih postopkov in varovanje pravic posameznikov;
establish, together with the Commission and with Parliament, a committee of wise persons (jurists) with the task of preparing a study on similarities and differences between the criminal law systems of all Member States and submit proposals for the development of an EU criminal justice area that will balance effectiveness in criminal proceedings with safeguarding individual rights;
naj skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom ter v sodelovanju s pristojnimi odbori Sveta Evrope, kot je Evropska komisija za učinkovitost sodstva, in z obstoječimi evropskimi mrežami, ki delujejo na področju kazenskih zadev, oblikuje objektiven, nepristranski, pregleden, celovit, horizontalen in neprekinjen sistem spremljanja in ocenjevanja izvajanja politik EU in pravnih instrumentov na tem področju, pa tudi kakovosti in učinkovitosti, integritete in pravičnosti sodstva; sistem naj upošteva tudi raven izvajanja sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v državah članicah in naj bo zasnovan po vzoru sistema vzajemnega ocenjevanja, zmožen pa naj bo pripraviti zanesljiva poročila najmanj enkrat letno.
set, together with the Commission and with Parliament, in cooperation with the relevant Council of Europe Committees, such as the CEPEJ, and with the existing European networks operating on criminal matters, an objective, impartial, transparent, comprehensive, horizontal and continuous monitoring and evaluation system of the implementation of EU policies and legal instruments in this area, as well as of quality and efficiency, integrity and fairness of justice, taking also into account the level of implementation of ECJ and ECHR case-law by Member States, modelled on the peer evaluation system and capable of producing reliable reports at least once a year.
oblikovati mrežo za ocenjevanje, ki bi bila sestavljena iz politične in tehnične ravni,
set up an evaluation network composed by both a political level and a technical level,
na podlagi pregleda obstoječih sistemov ocenjevanja opredeliti: prednostne naloge, področje uporabe, merila in metode, pri čemer bi se morali zavedati, da ocenjevanje ne bi smelo biti teoretično, temveč bi moralo presojati učinek politik EU na terenu in na vsakodnevno upravljanje sodstva, ter kakovost, učinkovitost, integriteto in pravičnost sodstva, pri tem pa upoštevati tudi raven izvajanja sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v državah članicah,
identify, on the basis of a review of existing evaluation systems: priorities, scope, criteria and methods, bearing in mind that the evaluation should not be theoretical but rather should assess the impact of EU policies on the ground and on the daily management of justice, as well as the quality, efficiency, integrity and fairness of justice, also taking into account the level of implementation of ECJ and ECHR case-law by Member States,
preprečiti podvajanje obstoječih sistemov ocenjevanja ter spodbujati sinergijo z njimi,
avoid duplication of and foster synergies with existing evaluation systems,
uporabiti mešan pristop, ki naj bo sestavljen tako iz statističnih kot zakonodajnih informacij ter iz ocene izvajanja instrumentov EU na terenu,
use a mixed approach composed of both statistical and legislative information and of an assessment of the application of EU instruments on the ground,
zbirati primerljive podatke in, če je mogoče, oceniti razpoložljive podatke,
collect comparable data and take stock, insofar as possible, of already available data,
tesno vključiti Parlament tako na politični kot na tehnični ravni sistema ocenjevanja;
involve Parliament closely in both the political and technical levels of the evaluation system;
naj skupaj s Komisijo in Parlamentom pazljivo oceni sedanji položaj pravosodnega usposabljanja v Evropski uniji, njegove slabosti in potrebe, ter ob izogibanju nepotrebnega podvajanja naporov sprejme takojšnje ukrepe, s katerimi bo spodbudil oblikovanje dejanske pravosodne kulture EU, z vzpostavitvijo evropske pravosodne šole za sodnike, tožilce, zagovornike in druge, ki zaposlene v sodstvu, ki bi jo morali:
take stock, together with the Commission and with Parliament, of the current state of judicial training in the European Union, its weaknesses and needs, and take immediate action, avoiding all unnecessary duplication of effort, in order to promote the creation of a genuine EU judicial culture by creating a European Judicial School for judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers and others involved in the administration of justice, which should:
zgraditi na temeljih obstoječe Evropske mreže za izobraževanje v pravosodju, kasneje pa jo razviti v inštitut EU, ki bi bil povezan z obstoječimi agencijami, imel pa bi trdno in ustrezno strukturo, v kateri bi imele najpomembnejšo vlogo nacionalne pravosodne šole, pravosodne mreže in druge organizacije, kot je Evropska pravna akademija in organizacije za pravice obrambe, sodelovati pa bi morala tudi Komisija,
be built, starting from the existing EJTN and in the perspective of developing toward an EU Institute linked with existing agencies, with a solid and appropriate structure, within which a pre-eminent role should be given to national judicial schools, judicial networks and other organisations, such as the Academy of European Law and defence rights organisations and with the association of the Commission,
upravljati in dodatno razvijati programe izmenjav med sodnimi organi,
manage and further develop the exchange programme for judicial authorities,
določiti enotne učne programe za pravosodno usposabljanje, ki bi zagotavljali, da bo evropska komponenta pomembno zastopana na različnih pravnih področjih,
set common curricula for judicial training ensuring that the European component is present as relevant according to the different fields of law,
ponujati začetno in nadaljevalno usposabljanje za evropske sodnike, tožilce in zagovornike na prostovoljni podlagi,
offer, on a voluntary basis, both initial and continuous training to European judges, prosecutors and defence lawyers,
povečati jezikovno znanje pravosodnih organov, odvetnikov in drugih vpletenih subjektov,
strengthen linguistic skills of judicial authorities, lawyers and other involved actors,
nuditi to usposabljanje tudi državam kandidatkam in drugim državam, s katerimi ima EU sklenjene sporazume o sodelovanju in partnerstvu;
offer such training also to candidate countries and other States with which the EU has concluded cooperation and partnership agreements;
naj pozove države članice, da nemudoma začnejo v celoti izvajati Sklep Sveta o okrepitvi Eurojusta in spremembi Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ (5613/2008) Še ni objavljen v Uradnem listu.
urge Member States to fully implement without delay the Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Council Decision 2002/187/JHA (5613/2008) Not yet published in the Official Journal.
ter spodbudijo nacionalne organe k vključitvi Eurojusta v zgodnji stopnji postopkov sodelovanja, da bi tako presegli odpor do izmenjave informacij in polnega sodelovanja, ki se je pokazal na nacionalni ravni, ter poziva Svet, Komisijo in Eurojust, naj v celoti in tesno vključijo Parlament v prihodnje dejavnosti, namenjene pravilnemu izvajanju sklepa o Eurojustu;
and to encourage national authorities to involve Eurojust in the early stages of the cooperation procedures, to overcome the reluctance to share information and to fully cooperate which has been shown at national level, and fully involve Parliament , together with the Commission and with Eurojust, closely in the forthcoming activities with a view to the correct implementation of the Decision implementing Eurojust;
naj pripravi načrt za izvajanje prej omenjenega sklepa, zlasti glede pristojnosti Eurojusta pri:
draw up a plan for the implementation of the above-mentioned decision, in particular with regard to Eurojust's competences on the:
reševanju sporov o sodni pristojnosti,
resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction,
opravljanju preiskav ali pregonov;
power to undertake investigations or prosecutions,
naj sprejme ukrepe, potrebne za vsakoletno objavo celovitega poročila o kriminalu v Evropski uniji, ki bo združevalo poročila o posebnih področjih, kot so ocena nevarnosti organiziranega kriminala (OCTA), letno poročilo Eurojusta itd.;
take action with a view to the publication, every year, of a comprehensive report on crime in the EU, consolidating reports related to specific areas such as OCTA (Organised Crime Threat Assessment), the Eurojust annual report etc;
naj pozove države članice, da še naprej obravnavajo pobudo Češke republike, Republike Poljske, Republike Slovenije, Slovaške republike in Kraljevine Švedske o okvirnem sklepu Sveta o preprečevanju in reševanju sporov o sodni pristojnosti v kazenskih postopkih (5208/2009), ki bi upošteval pravice osumljenca ali obtoženca, da je na vseh stopnjah postopka obveščen o postopku izbire kazenske jurisdikcije in vanj vključen, ter naj se na osnovi doseženega napredka med pogajanji v Svetu ponovno posvetuje s Parlamentom;
call on the Member States to continue working on the initiative of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and of the Kingdom of Sweden for a Council Framework decision on the prevention and settlement of conflicts of jurisdiction in criminal proceedings (5208/2009) respecting the rights of the suspect or defendant to be informed and involved at all stages of the choice of the criminal jurisdiction process, and consult Parliament again on the basis of the progress achieved during negotiations in the Council;
naj ustrezno pozornost nameni prednostim, ki jih ponujajo nove tehnologije pri zagotavljanju visoke stopnje javne varnosti, in v celoti izkoristi možnosti interneta pri širjenju informacij, krepitvi vloge novoustanovljenega pravosodnega foruma, spodbujanju razvoja novih učnih metod (e-učenje) ter zbiranju in izmenjavi podatkov, s posodabljanjem in krepitvijo obstoječih baz podatkov, kot so na primer carinske, ki so bistvenega pomena v boju proti tihotapljenju in trgovini z ljudmi, obenem pa zagotavljajo spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in zlasti visoko stopnjo zaščite zasebnosti posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v okviru sodelovanja policijskih in pravosodnih organov v kazenskih zadevah;
pay due attention to advantages offered by new technologies to ensure a high degree of public safety and to fully exploit the potential offered by the internet to disseminate information, to strengthen the role of the newly created "Justice Forum", to encourage the development of new learning methods (e-learning), and to gather and share data, updating and reinforcing existing databases such as the customs' databases, which are essentials in fighting smuggling and human trafficking, while at the same time ensuring respect for fundamental rights and notably a high level of protection of the privacy of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. maja 2009 o vplivu Lizbonske pogodbe na razvoj institucionalnega ravnotežja v Evropski uniji ( 2008/2073(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 7 May 2009 on the impact of the Treaty of Lisbon on the development of the institutional balance of the European Union ( 2008/2073(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z dne 6. marca 2008,
having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 6 March 2008,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 11. in 12. decembra 2008,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 11 and 12 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0142/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6-0142/2009 ),
ker Lizbonska pogodba krepi institucionalno ravnotežje Evropske unije, saj okrepi ključne funkcije posameznih političnih institucij ter s tem utrdi vlogo vsake od njih v institucionalnem okviru, v katerem je sodelovanje med institucijami bistveni element uspeha integracijskega procesa v Uniji,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon strengthens the institutional balance of the Union, inasmuch as it reinforces the key functions of each of the political institutions, thereby strengthening their respective roles within an institutional framework in which cooperation between the institutions is a key element of the success of the Union's integration process,
ker Lizbonska pogodba spreminja "metodo Skupnosti", in sicer jo prilagaja in krepi ter tako iz nje ustvarja "metodo Unije", katere bistveni elementi so:
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon transforms the former 'Community method', adapting and strengthening it, into a 'Union method' in which, in essence:
Evropski svet določa splošne politične usmeritve in prednostne naloge,
the European Council defines the general political directions and priorities,