natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker rezultat prošnje odbora organizaciji STO vpliva na obseg zmanjšanja kvot, zaradi česar je potrebno razmišljanje o prihodnosti sladkorja C,
whereas the outcome of the appeal against the WTO panel ruling will influence the level of quota cuts, making it necessary to consider the future of C sugar,
ker se je Evropska unija po preferencialnih sporazumih z državami AKP in Indijo obvezala, da bo uvozila določeno količino sladkorja z izvorom iz teh držav po zajamčeni ceni,
whereas, under the preferential agreements with the ACP countries and India, the European Union is committed to importing a fixed quantity of sugar from those countries at guaranteed prices,
ker pobuda EBA, če se uporabi v obstoječi obliki, lahko povzroči velik pritok sladkorja na evropski trg, zlasti prek nezakonite tristranske trgovine, ki obstaja pri ponovnem izvozu sladkorja, kupljenega po ceni na svetovnem trgu, v Evropo; ker je odkrivanje takih dejavnosti skoraj nemogoče, ker ti izvozi ogrožajo skladnost in ravnovesje urada OCTM in ker je ta goljufija v škodo evropskih davkoplačevalcev,
whereas the EBA initiative, if it is applied as it stands, will result in a massive influx of sugar onto the European market, in particular through illegal triangular trade whereby sugar purchased in advance at the world market price is re-exported to Europe; and whereas it is virtually impossible to detect transactions of this kind and such imports put the coherence and even the very balance of the common organisation of the market at risk and whereas, at the same time, such fraud is damaging to European taxpayers,
ker pobuda EBA kljub temu, da ima izredno velikodušne cilje, ne zagotavlja gospodarskega in socialnega razvoja najmanj razvitih držav (NRD), saj bodo od predvidene rasti tristranske trgovine imele koristi samo tretje države, ki so že konkurenčne, ker je to v primeru sladkorja z gospodarskega vidika napačno, saj bo od zdaj naprej vsako povečanje izvoza sladkorja NRD v Evropo povzročilo zmanjšanje evropske cene, kar je v nasprotju z vsemi interesi NRD,
whereas, although the EBA initiative is generous in its objectives, it does not provide the LDCs with any assurance of economic and social development since the likely increase in triangular trade will benefit only those third countries which are already competitive; and whereas it is economically misleading in relation to sugar as, in future, any rise in exports of LDC sugar to Europe will bring the European price down, which is against the interests of the LDCs,
ker zaradi tega NRD zahtevajo novo ureditev pobude EBA in ker bo poleg tega večletni sistem splošnih preferencialov potekel 31. decembra 2005,
whereas, consequently, the LDCs are calling for new rules for the EBA initiative and whereas the multiannual generalised system of preferences expires on 31 December 2005,
ker sta Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 2007/2000 in št. 2563/2000, ki državam Zahodnega Balkana zagotavljata brezcarinski in neomejen dostop do trga sladkorja Evropske unije, povzročili izjemno povečanje uvoza sladkorja iz teh držav, zlasti prek nezakonite tristranske trgovine, ki obstaja pri ponovnem izvozu sladkorja, kupljenega po ceni na svetovnem trgu, v Evropo,
whereas Council Regulations (EEC) No 2007/2000 and No 2563/2000, which provided free and unrestricted access to the European Union's sugar market for the West Balkan countries, have resulted in an unprecedented growth of sugar imports from these countries, in particular through illegal triangular trade whereby sugar purchased in advance at the world market price is re-exported to the European Union,
ker je v prihodnosti možna vključitev držav Zahodnega Balkana v Evropsko unijo, ni zaželeno in ne bi bilo razumno, da bi ustvarili presežne zmožnosti proizvodnje sladkorja, kar ne bi bilo gospodarsko zanesljivo, saj bi s preferencialno obdelavo spodbudilo ta razvoj,
whereas in view of the possible accession of the West Balkan countries to the EU in the future, it would not be desirable or reasonable to create economically non-viable excess sugar producing capacity by stimulating it with preferential treatment,
ker je cilj skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) zlasti spodbujanje večfunkcijskega značaja kmetijstva na celotnem ozemlju; ker mora SKP prispevati k zagotavljanju ustreznega življenjskega standarda za kmetijsko prebivalstvo, tako kot na to opozarjata osnutek Ustave za Evropo in lizbonska strategija; ker slednja med drugim vztraja na kvantitativnem in kvalitativnem izboljšanju zaposlovanja in na večji družbeni povezanosti; ker ocenjuje, da mora kmetijstvo po resolucijah, ki jih je Evropski svet sprejel v Luxembourgu (1997) in Berlinu (1999), ostati dejavnost, razdeljena na celotnem evropskem ozemlju, vključno z manj razvitimi regijami,
whereas one of the objectives of the CAP is to promote the multifunctional nature of agriculture throughout the Union and it should contribute to ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, as set out in the draft Constitution for Europe and the Lisbon strategy; whereas the latter emphasises the need to improve the level and quality of employment and ensure greater social cohesion; taking the view, following the resolutions adopted by the European Council in Luxembourg (1997) and Berlin (1999), that agriculture must continue as a European-wide activity, also including the less-favoured regions,
poudarja, da je resolucija Evropskega sveta v Bruslju (2002), v okviru katere je treba izvesti reforme, ki bodo vključile specifične probleme manj razvitih regij, in da morajo vzporedno potekati raziskave trajnega ohranjanja evropske konkurenčne proizvodnje,
emphasising the importance of the resolution of the European Council in Brussels (2002) which states that the reforms must be carried out in a way that gives due consideration to the specific problems of the less-favoured regions; and whereas, at the same time, efforts should be made to maintain competitive European production on a sustainable basis,
ker je treba v skladu sklepi Evropskega sveta iz Bruslja 24. in 25. oktobra 2002 še naprej upoštevati potrebe proizvajalcev iz manj razvitih regij Evropske unije,
whereas - as called for in the 24-25 October 2002 Brussels European Council conclusions - the requirements of producers living in disadvantaged regions of the EU must be met,
ker mora reforma skupne organizacije trga v sladkornem sektorju omogočati cenovno raven, ki zagotavlja primerno nadomestilo proizvajalcem v Skupnosti ter dobaviteljem iz držav AKP in NRD,
whereas the reform of the common organisation of the market in sugar should serve to ensure that prices are set at a level which will provide an adequate income both for Community producers and for suppliers based in the ACP countries and in the least-developed countries,
ker splošna usmeritev komunikacije Evropske komisije ruši ravnovesje v sladkornem sektorju in je v škodo proizvajalcev v Skupnosti in dobaviteljev najmanj razvitih držav ter proizvajalcev AKP,
whereas the general tendency of the Commission communication is to upset the existing balance in the sugar sector (to the detriment of Community producers, suppliers based in the least-developed countries and ACP producers),
ker bo znižanje cen in kvot, ki ga omenja Evropska komisija, v sektorju sladkorja povzročilo velike izgube prihodkov, ne da bi od tega imeli dobiček potrošniki, kot so to pokazale prejšnje reforme, ko se z znižanjem cen surovin niso znižale cene končnih izdelkov,
whereas the reduction in prices and quotas envisaged by the European Commission will lead to devastating income losses for those involved in the sugar sector, including beet growers, without - in all probability - bringing any real benefit to consumers, such as has already occurred in earlier reforms, where a reduction in the price of raw materials has not led to a reduction in consumer prices,
ker ima sladkorni trs izredno vodilno družbeno-ekonomsko vlogo v nekaterih najbolj oddaljenih regijah; ker predstavlja večfunkcijski in nezamenljiv značaj za dohodek kmetovalcev v teh regijah, ki so že prizadete zaradi strukturnih, specifičnih in trajnih težav, ki jih priznavajo pogodbe,
whereas sugar cane occupies a very dominant socio-economic position in certain of the outermost regions and plays an irreplaceable role in terms of farmers' income in those regions, which already suffer from specific and permanent structural disadvantages which are recognised by the Treaties,
ker rast proizvodnje sladkorja v nekaterih poglavitnih državah, ki proizvajajo
whereas the growing production of sugar in certain leading sugar cane producing countries has serious impacts on the environment, such as the devastation of rain forests, land-erosion and the exploitation of the natural resources, water, soil, etc.,
sladkorni trs resno vpliva na okolje, zlasti z uničevanjem deževnih gozdov, erozijo
Internal aspects of the reform
poudarja, da akterji na področju sladkorja potrebujejo dovolj veliko preglednost, da lahko izpeljejo potrebna vlaganja zaradi pojava večje konkurence; ocenjuje, da je nujno, da Komisija takoj določi svoje namene za obdobje po letu 2008; predlaga, da reforma CTMO ostane nespremenjena do konca leta 2012;
Points out that stakeholders in the sugar sector need sufficient predictability if they are to make the necessary investments to become more competitive; considers, therefore, that it is vital that the Commission should now clarify its intentions for the post-2008 period; suggests that the reform of the common organisation of the market should not be altered until the end of 2012;
je zadovoljen, da je Komisija naredila študijo globalnega vpliva različnih možnosti te reforme; vendar pa obžaluje, da v tem dokumentu niso vključene jasne posledice osnutka reforme v posameznih državah članicah in različnih proizvodnih regijah, zlasti v zvezi z uporabo v sektorju;
Welcomes the Commission's extended impact assessment of the various options for reform; but regrets that the document does not discuss the exact consequences of the proposed reform in the various Member States and different producing regions, particularly in terms of employment in the sector;
od Komisije zahteva, da čim prej izvede poglobljeno študijo vplivov, ki bo obravnavala socialno-ekonomske posledice te reforme za proizvajalce pese in delavce v tem sektorju ter posledice opustitve nekaterih kmetijskih območij v EU; poziva Komisijo, da razširi študijo o presoji vplivov na mogoče učinke reforme na trg žitaric;
Calls on the Commission to carry out a detailed impact assessment without delay for the purpose of studying the socio-economic repercussions which the reform will have both in the case of sugar beet producers and in the case of workers in the industry, and also the effect which it will have on the abandonment of certain rural areas in the EU; calls on the Commission to extend its impact assessment study to the possible effects of the reform on the cereals market;
opozarja, da je zmanjšanje cene sladkorja, ki ga predlaga Komisija, večje kot bi bilo potrebno za prilagajanje pravilom STO; zato zahteva, da se to zmanjšanje omeji na nujno potrebno, da se v EU doseže in vzdržuje trajna, uspešna in trdna proizvodnja, ob upoštevanju pravil STO; meni, da mora biti zmanjšanje kvot podrejeno enakemu načelu in da zmanjšanje cen kvot izpostavlja možnost za preživetje sektorja za najbolj ranljive regije, pa tudi za tiste najbolj konkurenčne;
Notes that the reduction in sugar prices proposed by the Commission goes beyond the requirements for compliance with the WTO rules; therefore calls for this reduction to be limited to what is strictly necessary to achieve and maintain a sustainable, efficient, robust sugar production in the EU, in compliance with the WTO rules; considers that the reduction in quota must be governed by the same principle and that the accumulative effect of the reduction in prices and quotas calls into question the viability of the sector in both the most vulnerable and the most competitive regions;
ocenjuje, da sistem referenčnih cen, ki ga predlaga Komisija, ni ustrezen in ne zagotavlja stabilnosti trga; zato predlaga, da se trenutno veljaven sistem podpore cen vzdržuje kot varnostna mreža, namenjena preprečevanju večjega neravnovesja na trgu sladkorja;
Considers that the current reference price system proposed by the Commission is not workable and will fail to achieve market stability; therefore suggests that the current price support system should be maintained as a safety net, to prevent severe imbalances developing in the sugar market;
ugotavlja, da vprašanje lastnine kvot zaenkrat še ni pravno obravnavano; od Komisije zahteva hitro razjasnitev te točke;
Notes that the question of quota ownership has not yet been legally determined; calls on the Commission to clarify this matter without delay;
ocenjuje, da sistem prenosa kvot, ki ga predlaga Komisija, ne ustreza ciljem na področju konkurence in zaposlovanja ter solidarnosti Skupnosti; ga zavrača, ker ogroža najbolj ranljive, zlasti s prenosom zaposlitev in nesprejemljivo premestitvijo dejavnosti proizvodnje;
Considers that the quota transfer system proposed by the Commission fails to meet the objectives of competitiveness, employment and Community solidarity; rejects it on the grounds that it threatens those that are most vulnerable, in particular by causing a transfer of jobs and a relocation of productive activity which is unacceptable;
od Komisije zahteva, da razmisli o oblikovanju posebnega sklada, ki ga upravlja Evropska unija in, ki bi omogočal tistim, ki to želijo, da zapustijo sistem pod ustreznimi pogoji s prostovoljno prodajo kvot Evropski uniji po spodbudni ceni in s postopnim zmanjševanjem v omejenem obdobju, te kvote bi bile takoj izbrisane; predlaga proračunsko nevtralno obliko financiranja v povezavi z akterji na tem področju in trgu;
Calls on the Commission to consider setting up a specific fund, managed by the European Union, to enable those wishing to leave the system to do so under reasonable conditions, through the voluntary sale of quotas to the European Union at an attractive price, degressive over time, for a limited period and for these quotas then to be abolished immediately; suggests a financing formula which is neutral in budgetary terms and involves stakeholders in the sector and also the market;
meni, da kvote predstavljajo ustrezno sredstvo za normalno vrednotenje proizvodnje v skupnem prostoru in da jih je treba za ta namen tudi uporabljati; predlaga, da zakonodajni predlog vključuje pojem najnižje proizvodne kvote, ki se ohrani znotraj države članice;
Considers that quotas are an appropriate means of achieving a balanced development of production throughout the Community and that they should be used to that effect; suggests that the legislative proposal include the concept of a minimum production quota, to be maintained within a Member State;
prosi Komisijo, da umakne predlog v zvezi z prenosom kvot med državami članicami;
Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal which allows the transfer of quotas between Member States;
poudarja, da so se nove članice pridružile Evropski uniji na osnovi obveznosti, za spoštovanje teh obveznosti pa je potreben ustrezen trud; predlaga, da Komisija razmisli o možnosti, ki tem državam omogoča, da ne trpijo zaradi kršitev ukrepov za zmanjšanje kvot; v tem kontekstu usmerja pozornost na resnične neenakosti z vplivom na načine določanja kvot B, ki veljajo za nove države članice; z zadovoljstvom sprejema predlog Komisije o dodelitvi nadomestila v celoti za proizvajalce sladkorne pese v novih državah članicah;
Points out that the new Member States joined the European Union on the basis of commitments that have demanded a significant effort to meet; suggests that the Commission should give thought to an arrangement whereby those States would not have to suffer excessive quota reduction measures; draws attention, in this context, to the substantial difference in the manner in which quota B is fixed for the new Member States; is delighted at the Commission's proposal to award full compensation to sugar beet growers in the new Member States;
poudarja, da mora biti reforma na eni strani usklajena s pravili STO in zagotavljati ponovno ravnovesje trga Skupnosti na področju sladkorja ter vzdrževati proizvodnjo in varovanje življenjskega standarda kmetov;
Notes that the reform should be consistent with WTO rules but should also ensure a balance on the Community sugar market, the continuation of production and the protection of farmers' living standards;
ocenjuje, da zmanjšanje ali ukinitev pomoči za izvoz ne sme voditi k varčevanju pri proračunskih sredstvih Skupnosti, vendar mora sektorju koristiti in omogočiti najboljše nadomestilo za izpad dohodka iz kmetijstva ali sprejem drugih ukrepov za ponovno vzpostavitev ravnovesja na trgu;
Considers that the expected cuts in or abolition of export subsidies must not result in savings of Community budget resources but should be used for the benefit of the sector in order either to enable farmers to be more adequately compensated for loss of income or other measures to be taken to achieve market equilibrium;
od Komisije zahteva, da upošteva rezultate odbora STO pri pripravi zakonodajnega predloga; zato želi, da dokument predlaga rešitve v zvezi s prihodnostjo sladkorja C; kot primer zahteva, da Komisija nujno ukrepa na področju razvoja alternativnih trgov za porabo sladkorja, da bo ponudila nove prodajne možnosti za proizvodnjo Skupnosti ob upoštevanju možnosti, predstavljenih z razvojem biogoriv; med drugim poziva Komisijo, da se usmeri k gospodarskim in ekološkim vidikom morebitne uporabe sladkorja kot biogoriva;
Calls on the Commission to take account of the outcome of the WTO panel in drafting its legislative proposal; in this context, hopes that the document will put forward solutions to the future of C sugar; for instance, calls on the Commission to take urgent steps to develop alternative outlets for the use of sugar so as to offer fresh marketing prospects for Community production, with regard, in particular, to the opportunities afforded by the development of biofuels; calls on the Commission to examine the possibilities of using sugar as biofuel, from an economic and environmental point of view;
zahteva, da je proizvodnja sladkorja predmet socialno-ekonomskih meril kot živila in biogoriva predmet socialno-ekonomskih meril ter vsaj predpisov, ki določajo vzajemno spoštovanje kmetijskih in okoljskih potreb, pa tudi predmet povečanega števila kultur, ki zahtevajo kolobarjenje, kar kmetom omogoča izboljšavo zemlje in zagotavlja večfunkcionalnost kmetijstva z vidika proizvodnje sladkorja;
Calls for the application of social and environmental standards to the production of sugar both as food and fuel, including at least the environmental standards of cross compliance and extended crop rotation as farmers' contribution to soil rehabilitation, thereby also promoting the multifunctional nature of agriculture in sugar production;
meni, da odškodnina za predviden izpad dohodka ni ustrezna; predlaga, da se v primeru znižanja omejene cene, navedene v točki 4, ohranja in dodeli okvir, ki ga predvideva Komisija izključno lastnikom plantaž in gojiteljem pese, da so slednji lahko upravičeni do tako zadovoljivega nadomestila, kot je mogoče; prav tako zahteva od Komisije, da pri izračunih nadomestil za padec cen upošteva veljavne cene v državah, kjer se te cene uporabljajo;
Believes that the compensation for likely income losses is inadequate; proposes that in the event of a limited cut in prices, as suggested in paragraph 4, the budget originally proposed by the Commission should be maintained and allocated specifically to planters and beet growers so that they receive the fullest possible compensation; calls also on the Commission to ensure that, when compensation for price reductions is being calculated, the lower prices practised in the Member States which have applied them are taken into account;
želi, da del sklada, omenjenega v točki 8, ali katerega koli drugega posebnega sklada, omogoča plačevanje odškodnin kmetom kot nadomestilo za izgubo njihovih pravic dostave in v smislu preusmeritve njihove dejavnosti; hkrati zahteva sprejetje ukrepov socialne zaščite, ki bodo koristili delavcem, prizadetim zaradi zaprtja podjetij, ki se ukvarjajo s sladkorjem;
Hopes that some of the funds referred to in paragraph 8 (or some other specific fund) can be earmarked for farmers' incomes, as compensation for the loss of their delivery rights and with a view to helping them switch to other activities; also calls for social security measures for the workers affected by the closure of sugar farms;
potrdi obvezo Komisije v korist posebnega ravnanja pri najbolj oddaljenih regijah; obžaluje pa ukinitev pomoči za prodajo; zahteva vzpostavitev tega mehanizma in celotno odškodnino za izpad dohodka, s čimer bi se v resnici upoštevale določene pomanjkljivosti najbolj oddaljenih regij;
Endorses the Commission's commitment to special treatment for the outermost regions; nonetheless regrets the abolition of marketing aid; calls for the reinstatement of this mechanism and total compensation for income losses so as to take proper account of the disadvantages specific to the outermost regions;
želi, da bi Komisija z vso pozornostjo obravnavala položaj proizvodnje v manj razvitih regijah Evropske unije in prepoznala ukrepe, potrebne za izogibanje izginjanju proizvodnje pese in sladkorja v teh območjih, takoj po reformi;
Hopes that the Commission will carefully assess the production situation in the disadvantaged areas of the EU and will identify the action which needs to be taken in order to prevent sugar-beet production from ceasing in such areas in the wake of the reform;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da podrobno spremljajo socialne posledice zaporednega zapiranja tovarn po prihodnji reformi sladkornega režima in da sprejme ustrezne ukrepe, če ti socialni načrti ne bodo zadovoljivi;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to monitor closely the social consequences of the possible closure of factories, due to the forthcoming reform of the sugar regime and to take appropriate action if social plans are unsatisfactory;
O zunanjem področju reforme
External aspects of the reform
opozarja, da ima zmožnost Unije, da nadzira ponudbe sladkorja na trgu, temeljno vlogo pri ravnovesju in sposobnosti preživetja urada CTMO za sladkor;
Points out that the Union's ability to manage the supply of sugar on its market plays a key role in the balance and viability of the common organisation of the market in sugar;
zahteva, da Komisija takoj po zahtevah držav AKP in NRD razmisli o obliki ureditve pobude EBA, ki omogoča Evropski uniji, da ohranja svojo sposobnost nadziranja ponudb in povzroča, da raven proizvodnje v Skupnosti ne bo postala odvisna od prilagajanj, ki jih sproža novi urad OCTM; predlaga, da ta oblika vzpostavi sredstva nadzora za obliko sistema uvoznih kvot, ki je lahko redno ocenjen na področju resničnega vpliva pobude EBA za razvoj teh držav, zlasti v zvezi z lokalno uporabo in proizvodnjo; predlaga, da so te kvote razdeljene na ravni, ki omogoča nadaljnjo proizvodnjo živil, namenjenih za zagotavljanje oskrbe z živili za zadevno državo;
Urges the Commission to satisfy the requests of the ACP countries and the least-developed countries and explore the possibility of a regulatory arrangement for the EBA initiative which allows the European Union to retain its ability to manage supply and avoids making the level of Community production the obligatory adjustment variable of the new common organisation of the market; suggests that this formula should take the shape of instruments for the quantitative monitoring of import quotas which could be reviewed at regular intervals on the basis of the real impact of the EBA initiative on the development of the countries concerned, particularly in terms of local employment and production; proposes that the quotas be at a level which enables other foodstuffs to be produced to meet the country's own needs;