natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker se izraz "civilna družba" nanaša na številne nevladne in neprofitne organizacije, ki so jih prostovoljno ustanovili državljani in so prisotne v javnem življenju ter so na podlagi etničnih, kulturnih, političnih, znanstvenih, verskih ali filantropskih načel izraz interesov, zamisli in ideologij njihovih članov in drugih ljudi,
whereas the term "civil society" refers to the numerous non-governmental and not-for-profit organisations established by citizens, of their own will, that have a presence in public life, expressing the interests, ideas and ideologies of their members or others, based on ethical, cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations,
ker se mnenja o vprašanju določitve reprezentativnega značaja organizacij civilne družbe razhajajo in dejavnosti ter učinkovitost nekaterih organizacij pri uveljavljanju svojih stališč ne ustrezajo vedno obsegu njihove reprezentativnosti,
whereas the representativeness of civil society organisations is very much a moot point, and whereas the vigour and effectiveness with which some organisations promote their ideas does not always reflect their representativeness,
ker so različne institucije EU izbrale različne pristope v zvezi s civilnim dialogom,
whereas the various EU institutions have different approaches to civil dialogue,
pozdravlja prispevek EU k razvoju civilnega dialoga na evropski ravni, pa tudi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni v državah članicah;
Welcomes the contribution made by the European Union to the development of civil dialogue, both at European level and at national, regional and local level in the Member States;
poudarja, da ima civilna družba v Evropi pomembno vlogo pri evropskem integracijskem procesu, saj evropskim institucijam posreduje stališča in zahteve državljank in državljanov EU; izpostavlja pomen strokovnega znanja, ki ga institucijam ponujajo predstavniki civilne družbe, in poudarja pomen vloge obveščanja in ozaveščanja o civilnem dialogu, zlasti pri spodbujanju in posredovanju ukrepov in ciljev EU, pri vzpostavljanju mreže za sodelovanje v Evropi ter krepitvi evropske identitete in prepoznavnosti v civilni družbi;
Stresses that civil society in Europe plays an important role in the European integration process, since it communicates the positions and demands expressed by EU citizens to the European institutions; highlights the importance of the expertise that civil society makes available to the institutions, and stresses the importance of providing information on and raising awareness about civil dialogue, in particular in connection with promoting the activities and objectives of the EU, building European cooperation networks and strengthening the European identity and identification with Europe within civil society;
poudarja, da so za uresničevanje političnih ciljev in projektov Evropske unije potrebni obširnejša javna razprava, učinkovitejši civilni dialog in okrepljena politična zavest;
Stresses that broader public debate, more effective civil dialogue and greater political awareness are necessary if the EU is to achieve its political goals and objectives;
opozarja na svoja posebna prizadevanja v okviru civilnega dialoga in na pomen, ki je temu dialogu namenjen v Lizbonski pogodbi, kjer mu je dodeljeno mesto nadrejenega načela, po katerem se ravnajo vse dejavnosti EU;
Emphasises its special attachment to civil dialogue and draws attention to the importance accorded to such dialogue by the Treaty of Lisbon, which has made it an overriding principle across all spheres of EU activity;
pozdravlja spodbujanje reprezentativne in participativne demokracije na podlagi določb Lizbonske pogodbe glede pobude državljanov, ki omogoča, da milijon državljank in državljanov iz več držav članic lahko pozove Komisijo k pripravi zakonodajnega predloga;
Welcomes the enhancement of representative democracy and participatory democracy resulting from the provision made in the Treaty of Lisbon for "citizens' initiatives" enabling one million citizens from a number of Member States to invite the Commission to submit a legislative proposal;
poziva institucije EU in nacionalne, regionalne ter lokalne oblasti v državah članicah, naj obstoječi pravni okvir in najboljše prakse kar najbolje uporabijo za razvijanje dialoga z državljankami in državljani ter organizacijami civilne družbe; zlasti meni, naj bi informacijske pisarne Parlamenta v vsaki državi članici imele dejavno vlogo pri spodbujanju, organizaciji in upravljanju forumov, ki vsaj enkrat letno potekajo med Parlamentom in predstavniki civilne družbe v državah članicah, in poudarja pomen redne udeležbe poslancev Parlamenta na teh forumih, in sicer tako poslancev iz zadevne države članice kot tudi iz drugih držav članic;
Calls on the EU institutions and the national, regional and local authorities in the Member States to make the fullest possible use of existing legal provisions and best practices in order to step up dialogue with citizens and civil society organisations; considers, in particular, that the European Parliament Information Offices in each Member State should play an active role in the promotion, organisation and management of forums that take place at least annually between Parliament and representatives of civil society in that Member State, and stresses the importance of the regular participation of its Members, both from the Member State concerned and from other Member States, in those forums;
poziva institucije EU, naj v civilni dialog vključijo vse zainteresirane predstavnike civilne družbe; meni, da je pri tem treba zlasti upoštevati glas mladih Evropejcev, ki bodo zasnovali jutrišnjo EU in prevzeli odgovornost zanjo;
Calls on the EU institutions to involve all interested civil society representatives in the civil dialogue; considers it essential, in this connection, for the voice of young Europeans, who will shape and take responsibility for the European Union of tomorrow, to be heard;
poziva institucije EU, naj v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu sprejmejo zavezujoče smernice za imenovanje predstavnikov civilne družbe, glede metod za pripravo posvetovanj in glede njihovega financiranja v skladu s splošnimi načeli in minimalnimi standardi za posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi Glej sporočilo Komisije z dne 11. decembra 2002 z naslovom "Krepitev kulture posvetovanja in dialoga – splošna načela in minimalni standardi za posvetovanje Komisije z zainteresiranimi stranmi"( KOM(2002)0704 ).
Calls on the EU institutions to adopt in an interinstitutional agreement binding guidelines concerning the appointment of civil society representatives, methods for organising consultations and their funding, in accordance with the general principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties See the Commission's communication of 11 December 2002 entitled "Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission" ( COM(2002)0704 ).
; poudarja, da bi v ta namen vse institucije EU morale voditi posodobljene registre vseh pomembnih nevladnih organizacij, ne glede na to, ali so dejavne v državah članicah in/ali so osredotočene na institucije EU;
; points out that, to this end, all EU institutions should maintain up-to-date registers of all relevant non-governmental organisations, whether they are active in the Member States and/or focused on the EU institutions;
poziva institucije EU, naj civilni dialog zastavijo kot nalogo za vse generalne direktorate Komisije, vse delovne skupine Sveta in vse odbore Evropskega parlamenta, ob uporabi preglednih postopkov in ohranjanju uravnoteženega odnosa med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem;
Calls on the EU institutions to make civil dialogue a horizontal task for all directorates-general in the Commission, all working parties in the Council and all committees in the European Parliament, using transparent procedures and maintaining a genuine balance between the public and private sectors;
poziva institucije EU, naj tesneje sodelujejo pri razvoju civilnega dialoga in promociji dejavnega evropskega mišljenja med državljankami in državljani EU, da se omogočijo boljša komunikacija, pretok informacij in usklajevanje v zvezi z ukrepi za posvetovanje z javnostjo; ugotavlja, da bi bila v zvezi s tem redna srečanja civilne družbe in komisarjev na forumih v državah članicah zelo zaželena za zmanjšanje prepada med EU in evropskimi državljani;
Calls on the EU institutions to cooperate more closely in developing civil dialogue and promoting an actively European mindset among EU citizens, with a view to ensuring better communication, information flow and coordination in connection with their public consultation activities; notes that, in this connection, regular meetings between civil society and Commissioners in forums in the Member States would be highly desirable as a way of reducing the perceived gap between the EU and the citizens of Europe;
poziva Svet, naj olajša in poenostavi dostop do svojega postopanja, saj je to osnovni pogoj za začetek pristnega dialoga s civilno družbo;
Calls on the Council to afford easier and simpler access to its proceedings, which is a fundamental precondition for genuine dialogue with civil society;
poudarja pomen napredne evropske komunikacijske politike pri zagotavljanju novih sredstev in načinov za komunikacijo z državljankami in državljani EU (ob uporabi spleta, elektronskih tehnologij in sodobnih avdiovizualnih tehnologij);
Stresses the importance of developing a European communication policy as regards providing new ways and means of communicating with EU citizens (using the internet, e-technologies and modern audiovisual technologies);
opozarja zlasti na pomen profesionalnih javnomnenjskih raziskav v Evropi za prepoznavnost in boljše razumevanje potreb in pričakovanj državljank ter državljanov EU v zvezi z delovanjem Unije; spodbuja institucije EU in civilno družbo v državah članicah, naj ta pričakovanja upoštevajo pri medsebojnem sodelovanju in razpravah;
Stresses the importance of the role played by professional European opinion polls in identifying and understanding the needs and expectations of EU citizens with regard to the way in which the Union operates; urges both EU institutions and civil society in the Member States to bear these expectations in mind in their interactions and debates;
poziva nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe v državah članicah, naj spodbujajo civilni dialog, zlasti v tistih državah in regijah ter na tistih področjih, kjer še ni popolnoma razvit ali uresničen; te organe nadalje poziva, naj dejavno spodbujajo razvoj regionalnega sodelovanja civilne družbe med državami članicami in čezmejne pobude; meni, da bi bilo prav tako treba preučiti oblikovanje grozdov v državah članicah kot način spodbujanja izmenjave zamisli in izkušenj znotraj Evropske unije;
Calls on the national, regional and local authorities in the Member States to foster civil dialogue, particularly in those countries and regions and in those sectors where it is not yet fully developed or sufficiently well implemented; further urges those bodies to promote actively the development of regional interactivity of civil society among Member States, and cross-border initiatives; considers that the building-up of Member State clusters should also be explored as a means of promoting exchanges of ideas and experiences within the EU;
poziva predstavnike evropske družbe, naj dejavno sodelujejo pri civilnem dialogu in oblikovanju evropskih programov ter politik, ki vplivajo na postopek odločanja;
Calls on representatives of European society to take an active part in civil dialogue and in the formulation of European programmes and policies, thereby making it possible to influence decision-making processes;
spodbuja državljanke in državljane EU, naj v večji meri sodelujejo pri evropskih razpravah in diskusijah ter se udeležijo bližajočih se volitev v Evropski parlament;
Encourages EU citizens to become more involved in European debates and discussions and to vote in the forthcoming European Parliament elections;
opozarja, da so za dialog z državljankami in državljani na vseh ravneh, torej evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni, potrebna ustrezna finančna sredstva, in poziva organe, ki sodelujejo pri tem dialogu in so zanj odgovorni, naj sredstva zagotovijo;
Points out that, for dialogue with citizens at all levels – European, national, regional and local –, appropriate financial resources are required, and calls on the stakeholders in that dialogue and the entities responsible for it to ensure that it is adequately funded;
poudarja, da je poleg dialoga s civilno družbo potreben tudi odprt, pregleden in reden dialog med EU ter cerkvami in verskimi skupnostmi, kot je predvideno v Lizbonski pogodbi;
Stresses that, besides dialogue with civil society, there also needs to be an open, transparent and regular dialogue between the Union and churches and religious communities, as provided for by the Treaty of Lisbon;
priporoča institucijam EU, naj skupaj razpolagajo z informacijami o zastopstvu in področjih dejavnosti organizacij civilne družbe v Evropi, na primer v obliki javne in uporabnikom prijazne zbirke podatkov;
Recommends to the EU institutions that they jointly make available information on the representativeness and fields of activity of civil society organisations in Europe, for example in a public, user-friendly database;
poziva Komisijo, naj poda nov predlog za evropska združenja, tako da se bodo evropske organizacije civilne družbe lahko sklicevale na skupno pravno podlago;
Calls on the Commission to submit a fresh proposal for European associations so that European civil society organisations can fall back on a shared legal basis;
naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj resolucijo posreduje parlamentom držav članic, Svetu, Komisiji, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the parliaments of the Member States, the Council, the Commission, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, in zlasti določb o ustanovitvi notranjega trga ter zagotavljanju svobode podjetjem v zvezi z opravljanjem storitev v ostalih državah članicah,
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the provisions thereof establishing the internal market and guaranteeing undertakings the freedom to provide services in other Member States,
(Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah),
("the UCP Directive"),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2006/114/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. decembra 2006 o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju UL L 376, 27.12.2006, str.
having regard to Directive 2006/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 concerning misleading and comparative advertising OJ L 376, 27.12.2006, p.
(Direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju),
("the MCA Directive"),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 97/55/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. oktobra 1997 o spremembi Direktive 84/450/EGS o zavajajočem oglaševanju, tako da vključuje primerjalno oglaševanje UL L 290, 23.10.1997, str.
having regard to Directive 97/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 October 1997 amending Directive 84/450/EEC concerning misleading advertising so as to include comparative advertising OJ L 290, 23.10.1997, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 84/450/EGS z dne 10. septembra 1984 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic o zavajajočem oglaševanju UL L 250, 19.9.1984, str.
having regard to Council Directive 84/450/EEC of 10 September 1984 relating to the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning misleading advertising OJ L 250, 19.9.1984, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 2006/2004 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. oktobra 2004 o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi organi, odgovornimi za izvrševanje zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov (Uredba o sodelovanju na področju varstva potrošnikov) UL L 364, 9.12.2004, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws (the Regulation on consumer protection cooperation) OJ L 364, 9.12.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 98/27/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. maja 1998 o opustitvenih tožbah zaradi varstva interesov potrošnikov UL L 166, 11.6.1998, str.
having regard to Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p.
ter poročila Komisije z dne 18. novembra 2008 o uporabi navedene direktive ( KOM(2008)0756 ),
, and to the report from the Commission of 18 November 2008 concerning its application ( COM(2008)0756 ),
ob upoštevanju Zelene knjige Komisije z dne 27. novembra 2008 o kolektivnih odškodninah za potrošnike ( KOM(2008)0794 ),
having regard to the Commission's Green Paper of 27 November 2008 on consumer collective redress ( COM(2008)0794 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. marca 2007 o strategiji potrošniške politike EU 2007−2013 ( KOM(2007)0099 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 13 March 2007 on the EU Consumer Policy strategy 2007-2013 ( COM(2007)0099 ),
ob upoštevanju več kot 400 peticij o zavajajočih podjetjih, ki ponujajo imeniške storitve, iz 24-ih držav članic in 19-ih tretjih držav, ki jih je prejel Odbor za peticije,
having regard to the more than 400 petitions on misleading directory companies from 24 Member States and 19 third countries received by its Committee on Petitions,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. decembra 2008 o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0608 .
having regard to its resolution of 16 December 2008 on misleading directory companies Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0608 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0514/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0514/2008 ),
ker je Komisijina strategija potrošniške politike EU 2007–2013 namenjena boljšemu spremljanju potrošniških trgov in nacionalnih potrošniških politik ter zlasti doseganju pravočasnega in enotnega prenosa Direktive o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah v nacionalno zakonodajo,
whereas the Commission's EU Consumer Policy strategy 2007-2013 aims at a "better monitoring of consumer markets and national consumer policies" and at achieving a "timely and uniform transposition of the unfair commercial practices Directive" in particular,
ker Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah vključuje nov pristop na področju evropske potrošniške zakonodaje z zagotovitvijo maksimalnega usklajevanja za zaščito potrošnikov pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami,
whereas the UCP Directive embodies a new approach in the field of EU consumer law in providing for maximum harmonisation for the protection of consumers against unfair commercial practices,
ker Direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju kodificira Direktivo 84/450/EGS in zlasti njene spremembe, uvedene z Direktivo 97/55/ES, ter omejuje njeno področje delovanja na poslovanje med podjetji,
whereas the MCA Directive codifies Directive 84/450/EEC, and in particular the amendments thereto introduced by Directive 97/55/EC, and narrows its scope to business-to-business (B2B) transactions,
ker je področje delovanja Direktive o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah omejeno na poslovanje med podjetji in potrošniki ter ne pokriva vseh poslovnih praks, temveč le tiste, ki veljajo za nepoštene; ker je navedena direktiva omejena na poslovne prakse, ki lahko škodujejo gospodarskim interesom potrošnikov, ne zahteva pa prilagajanja nacionalne zakonodaje za zaščito podjetij pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami drugih podjetij,
whereas the scope of the UCP Directive is limited to transactions between businesses and consumers and does not cover all commercial practices, but only those which can be considered as unfair; whereas it is limited to commercial practices which are capable of harming the economic interests of consumers, and adjustments of national legislation protecting businesses against the unfair commercial practices of other businesses are not required in its framework,
ker tri države članice Komisiji niso sporočile sprejetih ukrepov za prenos Direktive o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah, in sicer Nemčija, Španija in Luksemburg; ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti prejelo tri zahteve za predhodno odločanje glede skladnosti nacionalnih ukrepov z Direktivo o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah; ker Komisija meni, da je bil v nekaterih državah ugotovljen neprimeren prenos,
whereas three Member States have not notified the measures adopted to transpose the UCP Directive to the Commission, namely Germany, Spain and Luxembourg; whereas three requests for a preliminary ruling have been referred to the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) as regards the compatibility of national measures with the UCP Directive; whereas the Commission is of the opinion that inadequate transposition has been detected in some Member States,
ker Direktiva o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah ter Direktiva o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju državam članicam dopuščata precejšno diskrecijo glede pravnih sredstev in kazni za kršitev njunih določb,
whereas the UCP and MCA Directives leave Member States considerable discretion as regards the remedies and penalties for infringement of their provisions,
ker ni zadosti učinkovitih pravnih sredstev za kršitve Direktive o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju, pa tudi za kršitve njenega izvajanja, kar med drugim dokazujejo podjetja, ki ponujajo imeniške storitve in ki se poslužujejo zavajajočih praks,
whereas there is a lack of effective legal remedies for infringement of the MCA Directive, as well as a lack of enforcement of that Directive, as is demonstrated, inter alia, by directory companies engaging in misleading practices,
poudarja pomen Direktive o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah in Direktive o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju pri ustvarjanju večjega zaupanja potrošnikov in trgovcev v izvajanje čezmejnih transakcij in zagotavljanju večje pravne varnosti za podjetja glede dopustnosti različnih poslovnih praks in oglaševanja na notranjem trgu;
Stresses the importance of the UCP and MCA Directives in making consumers and traders more confident in engaging in cross-border transactions and in ensuring greater legal certainty for businesses in relation to the admissibility of different commercial practices and advertising in the internal market;
izpostavlja Direktivo o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah kot glavni predpis na področju potrošniške zakonodaje EU, katere prenos, izvajanje in izvrševanje bo glavni vir za nadaljnji razvoj potrošniške zakonodaje EU ter celostni razvoj potenciala notranjega trga, razvoj čezmejne trgovine in elektronskega trgovanja;
Highlights the UCP Directive as landmark legislation in the area of EU consumer law, the transposition, implementation and enforcement of which will be a crucial source for the future development of EU consumer law and for the full development of the potential of the internal market, the development of cross-border trade and e-commerce;