natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor
Pristojni organ
The competent authority
v zaprošeni državi zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor, če je razvidno, da bi kazenski postopek za dejanje, v zvezi s katerim je bil nalog izdan, kršil načelo
in the requested State shall refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order if it is clear that criminal proceedings for the offence in respect of which that order has been issued would infringe the
Sprememba 22 Člen 10, odstavek 2, uvodni del 2.
Amendment 22 Article 10, paragraph 2, introductory part 2.
Sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec
A court, a judge, an investigating magistrate or a public prosecutor,
v zaprošeni državi lahko zavrne priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor iz enega ali več naslednjih razlogov:
in the requested State may refuse to recognise and execute a European supervision order on one or more of the following grounds:
Sprememba 23 Člen 12, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 23 Article 12, paragraph 1 1.
v zaprošeni državi čimprej in najpozneje v 5 dneh od prejetja evropskega naloga za nadzor odloči, ali nalog priznava in ali ga bo izvršil, ali pa se bo skliceval na razloge za nepriznanje in neizvršitev.
in the requested State shall, as soon as possible and in any case within 5 days of receipt of the European supervision order, decide whether to recognise and execute it or to invoke grounds for non-recognition and non-execution.
v zaprošeni državi čim prej in najpozneje v 5 dneh od prejetja evropskega naloga za nadzor odloči, ali nalog priznava in ali ga bo izvršil, ali pa se bo skliceval na razloge za nepriznanje in neizvršitev.
in the requested State shall, as soon as possible and in any case within 5 days of receipt of the European supervision order, decide whether to recognise and execute it or to invoke grounds for non-recognition and non-execution.
Sprememba 24 Člen 12, odstavek 3 3.
Amendment 24 Article 12, paragraph 3 3.
Če je evropski nalog za nadzor nepopoln, lahko
Where the European supervision order is incomplete, the
sodišče, sodnik, preiskovalni sodnik ali javni tožilec
court, the judge, the investigating magistrate or the public prosecutor
v zaprošeni državi svojo odločitev o priznanju in izvršitvi naloga odloži, dokler organ izdaje naloga ne dopolni.
in the requested State may postpone its decision on the recognition and execution of the order until it has been completed by the issuing authority.
pristojni organ
competent authority
Sprememba 25 Člen 12, odstavek 4 4.
Amendment 25 Article 12, paragraph 4 4.
Če sta v skladu z odstavkom 3 priznanje in izvršitev evropskega naloga za nadzor odložena,
If, in accordance with paragraph 3, the recognition and execution of the European supervision order is postponed, the
v zaprošeni državi takoj pošlje poročilo s podrobnostmi o razlogih za odlog neposredno organu izdaje z uporabo kakršnega koli sredstva, ki omogoča izdelavo pisnega zapisa.
in the requested State shall forthwith communicate a report detailing the grounds for postponement directly to the issuing authority by any means capable of producing a written record.
Sprememba 26 Člen 12, odstavek 4 a (novo)
Amendment 26 Article 12, paragraph 4 a (new)
Sprememba 27 Člen 13, odstavek 4 4.
Amendment 27 Article 13, paragraph 4 4.
lahko ugodi z uporabo ustreznih video ali telefonskih povezav z
satisfied through the use of appropriate video or telephone links with
organom izdaje
the issuing authority
lahko izpolni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 10 Konvencije z dne 29. maja 2000 med organom izvršitve in
met in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10 of the Convention of 29 May 2000 between the executing and
organom izdaje.
the issuing authority.
Sprememba 28 Člen 17, odstavek 4 4.
Amendment 28 Article 17, paragraph 4 4.
lahko ugodi z uporabo ustreznih video ali telefonskih povezav
satisfied through the use of appropriate video or telephone links
med organom izvršitve in organom izdaje
between the executing and the issuing authority
(zaslišanje prek video- ali telefonske konference)
(hearing by video or telephone conference)
lahko izpolni v skladu s postopkom iz člena 10 Konvencije z dne 29. maja 2000
met in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 10 of the Convention of 29 May 2000
med organom izvršitve in organom izdaje.
between the executing and the issuing authority.
Sprememba 29 Člen 18
Amendment 29 Article 18
Pogoji za
Conditions for
Če organ izdaje odloči, da se osumljenec aretira in privede v državo izdaje,
If the issuing authority decides that the suspect must be arrested and transferred to the issuing State,
izda evropski nalog za prijetje v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ.
it shall issue a European arrest warrant in accordance with the provisions of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA.
Ne glede na člen 2(1) Okvirnega sklepa je mogoče v takih primerih izdati evropski nalog za prijetje in privesti osumljenca v državo izdajateljico v zvezi z vsemi kaznivimi dejanji, za katere je mogoče izdati evropski nalog za nadzor.
Notwithstanding Article 2 (1) of that Framework Decision, a European arrest warrant may, in such a case, be issued and the suspect be transferred to the issuing State in connection with all the offences for which a European supervision order may be issued.
Sprememba 30 Člen 20
Amendment 30 Article 20
Privedba osumljenca se lahko izjemoma odloži zaradi resnih človekoljubnih razlogov, na primer če obstajajo utemeljeni razlogi, da bi lahko privedba občutno ogrozila življenje ali zdravje osumljenca.
The transfer of a suspect may exceptionally be temporarily postponed for serious humanitarian reasons, for example, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that transfer would manifestly endanger the suspect's life or health.
Sprememba 31 Člen 21
Amendment 31 Article 21
Sprememba 32 Člen 22, odstavek 1 a (novo)
Amendment 32 Article 22, paragraph 1 a (new)
Sprememba 33 Naslov pod členom 22, poglavje 5 a (novo)
Amendment 33 Title, below Article 22, Chapter 5a (new)
Sprememba 34 Člen 22 a (novo)
Amendment 34 Article 22 a (new)
(a) podatki se obdelajo le, če to dovoljuje zakonodaja ter je to nujno in sorazmerno za zbiranje in/ali nadaljnjo obdelavo;
a) data processing shall only be undertaken insofar as it is permitted by law and is necessary and proportionate for the purpose of collection and/or further processing;
(b) podatki se lahko zbirajo le za posebne in zakonite namene ter se nadalje obdelujejo na način, ki je združljiv s temi nameni;
b) data shall be collected only for specified and legitimate purposes and further processed in a way compatible with those purposes;
(c) podatki so točni in posodobljeni;
c) data shall be accurate and updated;
(d) posebne kategorije podatkov o rasnem ali etničnem poreklu, političnih mnenjih, verskih ali filozofskih prepričanjih, članstvu v stranki ali sindikatu, spolni usmerjenosti ali zdravstvenem stanju se obdelujejo le, če je to absolutno nujno za namen posebnega primera in ob upoštevanju ustreznih zaščitnih ukrepov.
d) special categories of data concerning racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, party or trade union membership, sexual orientation or health shall be processed only if absolutely necessary for the purpose of a specific case and in accordance with appropriate safeguards.
Sprememba 35 Člen 22 b (novo)
Amendment 35 Article 22 b (new)
(b) preprečiti kaznivo dejanje;
(b) to prevent a crime;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 29. novembra 2007 o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o boju proti nekaterim oblikam in izrazom rasizma in ksenofobije v skladu s kazenskim pravom (11522/2007– C6-0246/2007 – 2001/0270(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 November 2007 on the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law (11522/2007 – C6-0246/2007 – 2001/0270(CNS) )
(Postopek posvetovanja – ponovno posvetovanje)
(Consultation procedure - Renewed consultation)
ob upoštevanju predloga Sveta (11522/2007),
having regard to the Council proposal (11522/2007),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2001)0664 ) UL C 75 E, 26.3.2002, str.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2001)0664 ) OJ C 75 E, 26.3.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 4. julija 2002 UL C 271 E, 12.11.2003, str.
having regard to its position of 4 July 2002 OJ C 271 E, 12.11.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet ponovno posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0246/2007 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament again ( C6-0246/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 93, 51 in 55(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Articles 93, 51 and 55(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0444/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0444/2007 ),
poziva Svet, naj ustrezno spremeni besedilo;
Calls on the Council to alter its proposal accordingly;
poziva Svet, naj se ponovno posvetuje s Parlamentom, če namerava predlog bistveno spremeniti ali ga nadomestiti z drugim besedilom;
Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Svet Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Uvodna izjava 6 (6)
Text proposed by the Council Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 6 (6)
Države članice priznavajo, da boj proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji zahteva različne vrste ukrepov znotraj celovitega okvira in da ne sme biti omejen na področje kazenskih zadev.
Member States acknowledge that combating racism and xenophobia require various kinds of measures in a comprehensive framework and may not be limited to criminal matters.
Ta okvirni sklep je omejen na boj proti posebno resnim oblikam rasizma in ksenofobije z uporabo kazenskega prava.
This Framework Decision is limited to combating particularly serious forms of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law.
Kulturne in pravne tradicije držav članic se zlasti na tem področju do neke mere razlikujejo, zato popolna uskladitev kazenskih zakonodaj trenutno ni mogoča.
Since the Member States" cultural and legal traditions are, to some extent, different, particularly in this field, full harmonisation of criminal laws is currently not possible.
Zagotoviti je treba, da se v državi in družbi privzame kultura strpnosti.
It is necessary to ensure a culture of tolerance embracing both State and society.
Ta okvirni sklep določa minimalno raven usklajenosti, njegovo učinkovitost pa omejujejo odstopanja, ki jih zagotavlja, vključno s tistimi v členu 1(2).
This Framework Decision establishes a minimum level of harmonisation and its effectiveness is limited by the derogations which it provides, including those in Article 1(2).
Sprememba 3 Uvodna izjava 6 b (novo)
Amendment 3 Recital 6 b (new)
Zakonodajna politika bi morala odražati dejstvo, da je v demokratični družbi kazensko pravo vedno zadnje sredstvo, in upoštevati vse zadevne vrednote, vključno s pravico do svobode izražanja in pravico vsakega posameznika do enakopravne obravnave in spoštovanja.
Legislative policy should reflect the fact that in a democratic society the criminal law is always a last resort, and should take into account all the values at stake, including the right to free expression and the right of all individuals to equal consideration and respect.
Če je storilec rasističnega ali ksenofobnega kaznivega dejanja nosilec javne funkcije, bi se to moralo obravnavati kot oteževalna okoliščina.
The commission of a racist or xenophobic offence by an office holder should be treated as an aggravating circumstance.
Sprememba 5 Člen 1, odstavek 1, točka (b)
Amendment 5 Article 1, paragraph 1, point (b)
zagrešitev dejanja iz točke a) z
commission of an act referred to in point a)
z vsebinami, ki predstavljajo dejanje v smislu točk a), c) ali d)
whose content constitutes an act within the meaning of points (a), (c) or (d)
Sprememba 6 Člen 1, odstavek 1, točka (e)
Amendment 6 Article 1, paragraph 1, point (e) (e)
(e) za namen odstavka
For the purpose of paragraph
na način, ki lahko moti javni mir, bodisi so to
likely to disturb public order or
grožnje, zmerjanje ali žaljenje;
which is threatening, abusive or insulting.
Sprememba 7 Člen 1, odstavek 1, točka (f)
Amendment 7 Article 1, paragraph 1, point (f) (f)
(f) za namen odstavka
For the purpose of
naj bi sklic na vero zajel vsaj ravnanje, ki je pretveza za dejanja, usmerjena proti skupini ljudi, opredeljeni glede na raso, barvo kože, poreklo ali nacionalno ali etnično pripadnost, ali proti članu te skupine.
, the reference to religion is intended to cover, at least, conduct which is a pretext for directing acts against a group of persons or a member of such a group defined by reference to race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin.
Vendar država članica iz kazenske odgovornosti ne bi smela izvzeti govorov ali ravnanj, ki utegnejo spodbujati sovraštvo.
A Member State should not, however, exempt from criminal liability speeches or behaviour liable to stir up hatred.
Spoštovanje svobode veroizpovedi ne omejuje učinkovitosti tega okvirnega sklepa.
Respect for freedom of religion shall not hinder the effectiveness of this Framework Decision.
Sprememba 8 Člen 1, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 8 Article 1, paragraph 2 2.
Vsaka država članica lahko ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa s strani Sveta poda izjavo, da bo kot kaznivo opredelila vsako zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena kaznivih dejanj iz odstavka 1(c) in/ali (d) le, če bo nacionalno sodišče te države članice in/ali mednarodno sodišče dokončno priznalo kazniva dejanja iz teh odstavkov
Any Member State may, at the time of the adoption of this Framework Decision by the Council, make a statement that it will make punishable denying or grossly trivialising the crimes referred to in paragraph 1(c) and/or (d), only if the crimes referred to in these paragraphs have been established by a final decision of a national court of this Member State and/or an international court
ali če jih bo dokončno priznalo le mednarodno sodišče
or by a final decision of an international court only
Vsaka država članica lahko ob sprejetju tega okvirnega sklepa s strani Sveta poda izjavo, da bo kot kaznivo opredelila vsako zanikanje ali grobo zmanjševanje pomena kaznivih dejanj iz odstavka 1(c) in/ali (d) le, če bo nacionalno sodišče te države članice in/ali mednarodno sodišče dokončno priznalo kazniva dejanja iz teh odstavkov.
Any Member State may, at the time of the adoption of this Framework Decision by the Council, make a statement that it will make punishable denying or grossly trivialising the crimes referred to in paragraph 1(c) and/or (d), only if the crimes referred to in these paragraphs have been established by a final decision of a national court of this Member State and/or an international court.
Sprememba 9 Člen 2, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 9 Article 2, paragraph 2 2.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je hujskanje k dejanjem iz člena 1
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that instigating the conduct referred to in Article 1
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je hujskanje k dejanjem iz člena 1 kaznivo.
Each Member State shall take the measures necessary to ensure that instigating the conduct referred to in Article 1 is punishable.
Sprememba 10 Člen 5, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 10 Article 5, paragraph 1 1.
Vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da so pravne osebe lahko odgovorne za dejanja iz členov 1 in 2, ki jih
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that legal persons can be held liable for the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2, committed
v njihovo korist
for their benefit
stori katera koli oseba,
by any person
ki deluje bodisi samostojno ali kot del organa te pravne osebe, njen
, acting either individually or as part of an organ of the legal person,
(a) pooblastilu za zastopanje pravne osebe, ali
(a) a power of representation of the legal person, or
(b) pooblastilu za sprejemanje odločitev v imenu pravne osebe, ali
(b) an authority to take decisions on behalf of the legal person, or
(c) pooblastilu za opravljanje nadzora znotraj pravne osebe.
(c) an authority to exercise control within the legal person.
(c) pooblastilu za opravljanje nadzora znotraj pravne osebe
(c) an authority to exercise control within the legal person.
in ki je delovala v tej vlogi.
and who has acted in that capacity.
Sprememba 11 Člen 5, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 11 Article 5, paragraph 2 2.
Poleg že navedenih primerov iz odstavka 1 vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je pravna oseba lahko odgovorna tudi v primeru, ko sta pomanjkljiv nadzor ali kontrola osebe iz odstavka 1 omogočila, da je njej podrejena oseba
Apart from the cases already provided for in paragraph 1, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 has made possible the commission of the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2
v korist te pravne osebe
for the benefit of that legal person
zagrešila dejanja iz členov 1 ali 2.
by a person under its authority.
Poleg že navedenih primerov iz odstavka 1 vsaka država članica sprejme ukrepe, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da je pravna oseba lahko odgovorna tudi v primeru, ko sta pomanjkljiv nadzor ali kontrola osebe iz odstavka 1 omogočila, da je njej podrejena oseba
Apart from the cases already provided for in paragraph 1, each Member State shall take the necessary measures to ensure that a legal person can be held liable where the lack of supervision or control by a person referred to in paragraph 1 has made possible the commission of the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 by a person under its authority
, za katere dejanja je po nacionalnem pravu lahko odgovorna pravna oseba,
for whose actions the legal person may be held liable under national law
Odgovornost pravne osebe iz odstavkov 1 in 2 ne izključuje kazenskih postopkov zoper fizične osebe, ki so storilci ali pomagači pri dejanjih iz členov 1 in 2.
Liability of a legal person under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators or accessories in the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2.
Odgovornost pravne osebe iz odstavkov 1 in 2 ne izključuje kazenskih postopkov zoper fizične osebe, ki so storilci
Liability of a legal person under paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not exclude criminal proceedings against natural persons who are perpetrators
ali pomagači pri dejanjih iz členov 1 in 2.
or accessories in the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2.
Sprememba 13 Člen 7 a (novo)
Amendment 13 Article 7 a (new)
Minimalne zahteve
Minimum provisions
Države članice lahko v boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji sprejmejo ali ohranijo višjo raven zaščite, kot je ta, ki izhaja iz določb tega okvirnega sklepa.
Member States may adopt or maintain a higher level of protection in the fight against racism and xenophobia than that arising from the provisions of this Framework Decision.
Izvajanje tega okvirnega sklepa ni v nobenem primeru razlog za znižanje ravni zaščite, ki jo države članice že zagotavljajo na področjih, ki jih ureja ta okvirni sklep.
Implementation of this Framework Decision shall in no circumstances constitute grounds for lowering the level of protection already ensured by the Member States in the areas governed by this Framework Decision.
V tem okvirnem sklepu se ničesar ne sme razlagati, kot da vpliva na kakršne koli obveznosti držav članic v skladu z Mednarodno konvencijo o odpravi vseh oblik rasne diskriminacije z dne 7. marca 1966.
Nothing in this Framework Decision may be interpreted as affecting any obligations incumbent on the Member States under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination of 7 March 1966.
Države članice izvajajo ta okvirni sklep v skladu s temi obveznostmi.
The Member States shall implement this Framework Decision in line with those obligations.
Sprememba 15 Člen 7, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 15 Article 7, paragraph 2 2.
Ta okvirni sklep od držav članic ne sme zahtevati, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli v zvezi s svobodo združevanja in svobodo izražanja, zlasti svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v drugih medijih, kakor izhajajo iz ustavnih tradicij, ali s pravili, ki urejajo pravice in odgovornosti tiska ali drugih medijev in postopkovna jamstva zanje, kadar so ta pravila povezana z določitvijo ali omejitvijo odgovornosti.
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction to fundamental principles relating to freedom of association and freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and the freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Ta okvirni sklep od držav članic ne sme zahtevati, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki so v nasprotju s
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of requiring Member States to take measures in contradiction
temeljnimi načeli
fundamental principles
v zvezi s svobodo združevanja in svobodo izražanja, zlasti svobodo tiska in svobodo izražanja v drugih medijih, kakor izhajajo iz ustavnih tradicij, ali s pravili, ki urejajo pravice in odgovornosti tiska ali drugih medijev in postopkovna jamstva zanje, kadar so ta pravila povezana z določitvijo ali omejitvijo odgovornosti.
relating to freedom of association and freedom of expression, in particular freedom of the press and the freedom of expression in other media as they result from constitutional traditions or rules governing the rights and responsibilities of, and the procedural guarantees for, the press or other media where these rules relate to the determination or limitation of liability.
Sprememba 16 Člen 9, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 16 Article 9, paragraph 1 1.
Vsaka država članica sprejme potrebne ukrepe za vzpostavitev svoje sodne pristojnosti v zvezi z dejanji iz členov 1 in 2, kadar:
Each Member State shall take the necessary measures to establish its jurisdiction with regard to the conduct referred to in Articles 1 and 2 where :
(a) je dejanje storjeno v celoti ali deloma na njenem ozemlju; ali
in whole or in part within its territory; or
dejanje storjeno v korist
the conduct has been committed
glavna uprava
the head office of the
pravne osebe, ki
legal person that
se lahko šteje za odgovorno,
may be held liable is situated
na ozemlju te države članice.
in the territory of that Member State.
Sprememba 17 Člen 10, odstavek 3 3.
Amendment 17 Article 10, paragraph 3 3.
tega pregleda se Svet pri državah članicah pozanima, ali je prišlo do težav pri pravosodnem sodelovanju v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 1(1).
For the preparation of this review, the Council shall ask Member States whether they have experienced difficulties in judicial cooperation with regard to the offences under Article 1 paragraph 1.
Poleg tega Svet lahko zaprosi Eurojust, naj predloži poročilo o tem, ali so razlike med nacionalnimi zakonodajami povzročile težave pri pravosodnem sodelovanju med državami članicami na tem področju.
In addition, the Council may request Eurojust to submit a report, on whether differences between national legislations have resulted in any problems regarding judicial cooperation between the Member States in this area.
tega pregleda se Svet pri državah članicah pozanima, ali je prišlo do težav pri pravosodnem sodelovanju v zvezi s kaznivimi dejanji iz člena 1(1)
For the preparation of this review, the Council shall ask Member States whether they have experienced difficulties in judicial cooperation with regard to the offences under Article 1, paragraph 1