natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. marca 2009 o skupnem besedilu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odgovornosti prevoznikov potnikov po morju v primeru nesreč, ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6-0047/2009 – 2005/0241(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2009 on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6-0047/2009 – 2005/0241(COD) )
ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6-0047/2009 ),
having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3724/2008 – C6-0047/2009 ),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz druge obravnave Sprejeta besedila, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0445 .
having regard to its position at second reading Texts adopted, 24.9.2008, P6_TA(2008)0445 .
ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije o spremembah skupnega stališča, ki jih je predlagal Parlament ( KOM(2008)0831 ),
having regard to the Commission's opinion on Parliament's amendments to the common position ( COM(2008)0831 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila delegacije Evropskega parlamenta v Spravnem odboru ( A6-0102/2009 ),
having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6-0102/2009 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. marca 2009 o Skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavarovanju lastnikov ladij za pomorske zahtevke (14287/2/2008 – C6-0483/2008 – 2005/0242(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2009 on the common position adopted by the Council with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the insurance of shipowners for maritime claims (14287/2/2008 – C6-0483/2008 – 2005/0242(COD) )
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (14287/2/2008 – C6-0483/2008 ) UL C 330 E, 30.12.2008, str.
having regard to the Council common position (14287/2/2008 – C6-0483/2008 ) OJ C 330 E, 30.12.2008, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0593 ),
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0593 ),
ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0674 ),
having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0674 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0072/2009 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0072/2009 ),
ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008 ) UL C 330 E, 30.12.2008, str.
having regard to the Council common position (14288/2/2008 – C6-0484/2008 ) OJ C 330 E, 30.12.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave držav članic o pomorski varnosti (15859/2008),
having regard to the statement of the Member States on maritime safety (15859/2008),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča s prve obravnave UL C 27 E, 31.1.2008, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 27 E, 31.1.2008, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0586 ),
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0586 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0069/2009 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0069/2009 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. marca 2009 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 1999/62/ES o cestnih pristojbinah za uporabo določene infrastrukture za težka tovorna vozila ( KOM(2008)0436 – C6-0276/2008 – 2008/0147(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 11 March 2009 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures ( COM(2008)0436 – C6-0276/2008 – 2008/0147(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0436 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0436 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 71(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0276/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 71(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0276/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0066/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0066/2009 ),
Spodbujanje trajnostnega prometa je poglavitni del skupne prometne politike.
The promotion of sustainable transport is a key element of the common transport policy.
Prav tako bi bilo treba kot del lizbonske strategije za rast in zaposlovanje uravnoteženo uskladiti naslednje prednostne cilje, in sicer varstvo okolja, socialno in ekonomsko kohezijo ter konkurenčnost EU.
The following priority objectives, namely environmental protection, social and economic cohesion and EU competitiveness, should also be reconciled in a balanced way as part of the Lisbon Strategy for growth and employment.
Cilj zmanjševanja negativnih vplivov prometa je treba doseči na način, ki ne bo nesorazmerno oviral prostega pretoka v korist zdrave gospodarske rasti in pravilnega delovanja notranjega trga.
The objective of reducing the negative impacts of transport should be achieved in such a way as to avoid disproportionate obstacles to the freedom of movement in the interest of sound economic growth and the proper functioning of the internal market.
Treba bi bilo poudariti, da je načelo internalizacije zunanjih stroškov enakovredno instrumentu za upravljanje in bi zato moralo uporabljati za spodbujanje uporabnikov cest in zadevnih industrijskih sektorjev, da izkoristijo in razširijo ustrezne zmožnosti na področju okolju prijaznejšega prevoza, na primer s spremembo ravnanja med vožnjo ali nadaljnjim tehnološkim razvojem.
It should also be emphasised that the principle of internalising external costs is the equivalent of a management instrument and should therefore be used to encourage road users and the related industrial sectors to exploit and expand their respective capabilities in the area of environmentally-friendly transport, for example by means of changes in driving behaviour or further technological development.
je bila Komisija pozvana, da predstavi model za ocenjevanje vseh zunanjih stroškov, ki jih povzroča uporaba prometne infrastrukture, ki bo osnova za izračunavanje infrastrukturnih pristojbin v prihodnosti.
called on the Commission to present a model for the assessment of all external costs arising from use of the transport infrastructure to serve as the basis for future calculations of infrastructure charges.
Ta model naj bi spremljala analiza učinkov interiorizacije zunanjih stroškov za vse vrste prevoza in strategija za postopno uporabo tega modela ter, če je ustrezno, predlogi za nadaljnji pregled navedene direktive.
This model was to be accompanied by an impact analysis of the internalisation of external costs for all modes of transport and a strategy for a stepwise implementation of the model and, if appropriate, by proposals for further revision of that Directive.
Za uveljavitev bolj trajnostne prometne politike morajo cene prevoza bolje odražati
In order to move towards a sustainable transport policy, transport prices should better reflect the
stroške v zvezi z ▌
costs related to
vozil, vlakov, letal ali ladij ▌.
the ▌ use of vehicles, trains, planes or ships ▌.
Za to je potreben
This calls for a
usklajen in ambiciozen
coherent and ambitious
pristop za vse vrste prevoza, pri čemer je treba upoštevati njihove posebne značilnosti.
approach in all transport modes, taking into account their particular characteristics.
Pri drugih vrstah prevoza kot cestni prevoz se je internalizacija zunanjih stroškov že začela, ustrezna zakonodaja Skupnosti pa omogoča, da se internalizacija izvaja postopno ali je vsaj ne preprečuje.
Transport modes other than road transport have already started to internalise external costs and the relevant Community legislation either phases in such internalisation or at least does not prevent it.
bi bilo treba reševati z vključitvijo letalstva v sistem za trgovanje z emisijami (ETS).
emissions should be tackled by including aviation in the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).
ETS se uporablja tudi za oskrbo vlakov z električno energijo, vanj pa se bo kmalu vključil tudi pomorski promet.
The use of electricity for trains is also covered by the ETS and maritime transport is to be included in the ETS shortly.
Druge zunanje stroške je mogoče internalizirati prek letaliških pristojbin, ki se jih lahko diferencira iz okoljskih razlogov, in prek infrastrukturnih pristojbin za uporabo železnic v skladu z Direktivo 2001/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. februarja 2001 o dodeljevanju železniških infrastrukturnih zmogljivosti in naložitvi uporabnin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture
Other external costs can be internalised through airport charges, which can be differentiated for environmental purposes and through infrastructure charges for the use of railways pursuant to Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2001 on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure
V skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2001/14/ES, ki določa načela zaračunavanja pristojbin za uporabo železniške infrastrukture, je internalizacija zunanjih stroškov že mogoča.
According to Article 7 of Directive 2001/14/EC, which sets out the charging principles for the use of railway infrastructure, internalisation of external costs is already possible.
Vendar je predpogoj za večjo spremembo pristojbin za dostop po tirih in za popolno internalizacijo zunanjih stroškov v železniškem sektorju to, da se pristojbine za zunanje stroške uporabljajo tudi za sektor cestnega prometa.
However, in order to modulate track access charges more widely and have a complete internalisation of external costs in the railway sector, it is a precondition that the road transport sector also applies external cost charging.
V sektorju cestnega prometa se že zaračunava več davkov in pristojbin, vključno z davki in pristojbinami za delno povrnitev zunanjih stroškov, na primer stroškov CO
In the road transport sector, several taxes and charges already apply, including taxes and charges to partially compensate for external costs such as CO
, kot v primeru trošarin na gorivo.
, as is for example the case with excise taxes on fuel.
, saj so neposredno povezane z uporabo infrastrukture ter jih je mogoče diferencirati glede na prevoženo razdaljo, okoljsko uspešnost vozila ter kraj in čas uporabe vozila ter jih je zato mogoče določiti na ravneh, ki ustrezajo stroškom onesnaževanja in zastojem zaradi dejanske uporabe vozil.
with the use of infrastructure and can vary according to the distance travelled, the environmental performance of vehicles and the place and time of use of vehicles and therefore can be set at a level which reflects the cost of pollution and congestion caused by the actual use of vehicles.
Poleg tega cestnine ne povzročajo izkrivljanja konkurence v notranjem trgu, saj jih morajo plačevati vsi operaterji ne glede na njihovo državo članico izvora ali sedeža ter sorazmerno z intenzivnostjo uporabe cestnega omrežja.
Moreover, tolls do not create any distortion of competition within the internal market since they are payable by all operators irrespective of their Member State of origin or establishment and in proportion to the intensity of use of the road network.
za boj proti podnebnim spremembam.
strategy to fight climate change.
Cestnine, ki v svojem izračunu za uporabo cest z gostim prometom upoštevajo stroške v zvezi z zastoji,
Tolls which integrate a cost element related to congestion for using congested roads into their calculation
so lahko
can only be
če so del akcijskega načrta, ki vključuje ukrepe, povezane z drugimi uporabniki cest
if they are part of an action plan which includes measures related to
Model za izračunavanje zunanjih stroškov, ki ga je oblikovala Komisija, zagotavlja zanesljive načine in navaja številne vrednosti enot, na podlagi katerih je mogoče izračunavati uporabnine za ceste.
The model devised by the Commission for calculating the ▌external costs provides reliable methods and a range of unit values which can already serve as a basis for the calculation of road user charges.
Srednjeročno bi si bilo treba prizadevati za doseganje konvergence v metodah, ki jo vsi evropski sistemi zaračunavanja uporabljajo pri izračunu zunanjih stroškov za zagotovitev, da evropski cestni prevozniki prejmejo jasne cenovne signale, ki delujejo kot spodbuda za izboljšanje njihovega ravnanja.
Efforts should be made in the medium term to bring about convergence in the methods which all European charging systems use to calculate external costs in order to ensure that European road hauliers receive clear price signals, which act as an incentive to optimise their behaviour.
Dokler tovrstne negotovosti niso odpravljene, se zdi prilagodljiv pristop na ravni Skupnosti najustreznejši.
Until such uncertainties are dealt with, a flexible approach at Community level appears most appropriate.
Ta prilagodljivi pristop bi moral državam članicam prepustiti, da se na podlagi lokalnih in nacionalnih značilnosti omrežja odločijo, ali bodo zaračunavale pristojbine za zunanje stroške ali ne ter na katerih cestah jih bodo zaračunavale.
This flexible approach should leave Member States to decide whether and on which roads to introduce external cost charges on the basis of the local and national characteristics of the network.
Časovno omejene uporabnine in cestnine se na ozemlju države članice ne bi smele uporabljati hkrati, da ne pride do drobitve shem zaračunavanja pristojbin z negativnimi učinki za prometno panogo, razen v nekaterih posebnih primerih, ko je treba financirati gradnjo predorov, mostov in gorskih prelazov.
Time-based user charges and tolls should not be applied simultaneously within the territory of a Member State in order to avoid a fragmentation of the charging schemes with negative effects for the transport industry, except in certain specific cases where this is necessary to finance the construction of tunnels, bridges or mountain passes.
Časovno omejene uporabnine, ki se zaračunavajo dnevno, tedensko, mesečno ali letno, ne bi smele biti diskriminacijske do občasnih uporabnikov, saj je velik delež tovrstnih uporabnikov najverjetneje tujih prevoznikov.
Time-based user charges levied on a daily, weekly, monthly or annual basis should not discriminate against occasional users, since a high proportion of such users are likely to be non-national hauliers.
Za učinkovitost in poštenost bi bilo treba časovno omejene uporabnine obravnavati kot prehodni instrument za zaračunavanje pristojbin za infrastrukturo.
For reasons of efficiency and fairness, time-based user charges should be considered as a transitional instrument for charging of infrastructure.
Treba se je izogniti nedoslednostim med shemami zaračunavanja pristojbin za vseevropsko omrežje in druge dele cestnega omrežja, po katerih lahko poteka mednarodni promet.
Inconsistent charging schemes should be avoided between the trans-European network and other parts of the road network which may be used by international traffic.
Zato se morajo na celotnem medmestnem cestnem omrežju uporabljati enaka načela zaračunavanja pristojbin.
The same charging principles should therefore be applied to the entire interurban road network.
Dovoljeno bi moralo biti, da bi bili v cestninah na podlagi prevožene razdalje upoštevani zunanji stroški na podlagi stroškov onesnaževanja zraka in obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa.
Tolls based on distance travelled should be allowed to include an external cost element based on the cost of traffic-based air and noise pollution.
Da bi bolje odražali stroške onesnaževanja zraka in obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa ter stroške zastojev, bi se morale pristojbine za zunanje stroške razlikovati glede na vrsto ceste, vrsto vozila in časovno obdobje, kot so dnevne, tedenske ali sezonske prometne konice ali obdobja zunaj njih ter nočni čas.
To better reflect the cost of traffic-based air and noise pollution, and congestion, the external cost charge should vary according to the type of roads, type of vehicles and time periods such as daily, weekly or seasonal peak and off peak periods and the night period.
Za nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga je treba vzpostaviti okvir Skupnosti, ki bi zagotovil pregledno, sorazmerno in nediskriminacijsko določanje cestnih pristojbin na podlagi lokalnih stroškov onesnaževanja zraka in obremenitev s hrupom zaradi prometa ter stroškov zastojev.
The smooth functioning of the internal market requires a Community framework in order to ensure that road charges set on the basis of the local cost of traffic-based air and noise pollution and congestion are transparent, proportionate and non-discriminatory.
Za to je potrebna uporaba skupnih načel za zaračunavanje pristojbin, načinov za izračun in vrednosti enot zunanjih stroškov, ki temeljijo na priznanih znanstvenih metodah, ter vzpostavitev mehanizmov za obveščanje Komisije o cestninskih shemah in poročanje o tem.
This requires common charging principles, calculation methods and unit values of external costs based on acknowledged scientific methods together with mechanisms for notifying and reporting tolling schemes to the Commission.
Organ, odgovoren za določanje pristojbin za zunanje stroške, tudi ne bi smel imeti osebnih interesov za določanje neupravičeno visokih zneskov, zato bi moral biti neodvisen od organa, ki pobira cestnine in upravlja prihodke od cestnin.
The authority which sets the external cost charge should also have no vested interest in setting the amount at an undue level and should therefore be independent from the body which collects and manages toll revenue.
Izkušnje so pokazale, da dodajanje pribitka cestninam v goratih območjih za financiranje prednostnih projektov vseevropskega omrežja ▌ ni izvedljiva možnost,
Experience has shown that adding a mark-up to tolls in mountainous areas in order to finance priority projects of the trans-European network is not a practicable option
kjer opredelitev koridorja ne ustreza dejanskim pretokom prometa
where the definition of a corridor does not correspond to the actual traffic flow
Za rešitev te težave
To remedy this situation,
Države članice, ki imajo možnost, da uporabijo pribitke, bi morale tej možnosti dati prednost pred zaračunavanjem pristojbin za zunanje stroške, da bi bila tako zagotovljena prednost gradnji prednostnih projektov v interesu Skupnosti.
In order to give precedence to the construction of priority projects of European interest, Member States which have the possibility of applying a mark-up should use this option before levying an external cost charge.
prometu veljalo za neupravičeno breme za nekatere kategorije uporabnikov in ga bi bilo zato treba preprečiti.
road safety would represent an undue burden on certain categories of users and should accordingly be precluded.
Popusti in znižanja pristojbin za zunanje stroške ne bi smeli biti dovoljeni, saj bi pomenili znatno tveganje za neupravičeno diskriminacijo nekaterih kategorij uporabnikov.
Discounts or reductions of the external cost charge should not be permitted as there would be a significant risk that they would unduly discriminate against certain categories of users.
Zaračunavanje pristojbin za zunanje stroške prek cestnin bo učinkoviteje vplivalo na prometne odločitve, če se bodo uporabniki zavedali teh stroškov.
Charging external costs through tolls will be more effective in influencing transport decisions if users are aware of these costs.
Zato bi jih bilo treba posebej prikazati na
They should accordingly be identified separately on a
izkazu, računu ali temu enakovrednem dokumentu, ki ga izda cestninski operater.
statement, a bill or an equivalent document from the toll operator.
Uporaba elektronskih cestninskih sistemov je nujna za preprečitev prekinitev prostega pretoka prometa in škodljivih vplivov na lokalno okolje, ki bi jih lahko povzročile kolone pred cestninskimi zapornicami.
The use of electronic tolling systems is essential to avoid disruption to the free flow of traffic and to prevent adverse effects on the local environment caused by queues at toll barriers.
Zato bi bilo prav zagotoviti, da se pristojbine za
It is therefore appropriate to ensure that the
infrastrukturo in
infrastructure and
, v kateri so predvideni ustrezni in sorazmerni ukrepi, ki zagotavljajo, da se pri izvajanju elektronskega cestninjenja primerno obravnavajo tehnična, pravna in poslovna vprašanja, varstvo podatkov ter zasebnost.
that foresees appropriate and proportionate measures to ensure that technical, legal, commercial and data protection and privacy concerns are properly addressed in the implementation of electronic tolling.
Pomembno je, da se cilj iz te direktive dosežejo na način, ki ne škodi pravilnemu delovanju notranjega trga.
It is important that the objective of this Directive should be attained in a way which does not harm the proper functioning of the internal market.
Poleg tega je treba preprečiti, da se v prihodnje vozniki težkih tovornih vozil obremenijo z vse več nezdružljive in drage elektronske opreme ter se s tem tvega, da bodo pri njeni uporabi storjene napake.
Moreover, it is important to avoid heavy goods vehicle drivers in future being saddled with ever more incompatible and expensive electronic equipment in their cabs and running the risk of making errors in its use.
Zato bi bilo treba čim prej doseči interoperabilnost cestninskih sistemov Skupnosti, kakor je določeno v Direktivi 2004/52/ES.
The interoperability of the toll systems in the Community, as provided for in Directive 2004/52/EC, should therefore be achieved as quickly as possible.
Treba bi si bilo prizadevati, da se število naprav v vozilih omeji na eno, kar omogoča, da se uporabljajo različne cene, ki veljajo v državah članicah.
Efforts should be made to limit the number of devices in the vehicle to one, which makes it possible to apply the various rates which are in force in the various Member States.
Komisija bi morala sprejeti vse nujne ukrepe, da zagotovi čim hitrejšo uvedbo resnično interoperabilnega sistema v skladu z Direktivo 2004/52/ES do konca leta 2010.
The Commission should take all necessary measures to ensure the rapid introduction of a truly interoperable system by the end of 2010, in accordance with Directive 2004/52/EC.
Za zagotovitev pravne jasnosti bi bilo treba podrobno določiti, kje so dovoljene regulatorne dajatve, katerih izrecni namen je zmanjševanje prometnih zastojev ali boj proti okoljskim vplivom, vključno s slabo kakovostjo zraka.
For reasons of legal clarity, it should be specified where regulatory charges specifically designed to reduce traffic congestion or combat environmental impacts, including poor air quality are permitted.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost uporabljati proračun vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (TEN-T) in strukturne sklade za izboljšanje prometnih infrastruktur s ciljem zmanjšanja zunanjih stroškov prometa na splošno in izvajanja elektronskega zbiranje cestnin, ki izhaja iz določb te direktive.
Member States should be able to use the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) budget and the Structural Funds in order to improve transport infrastructures with a view to reducing the external costs of transport in general and implementing electronic means of collecting the charges arising from the provisions of this Directive.
Mogoče jih je porabiti tudi za
It may also be used