natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Podatki o tej vsebini si nasprotujejo; zaradi tega zastavljam vprašanje, ali v Evropski uniji obstajajo mejne vrednosti za emisije naftalin sulfonata.
As conflicting information on the subject is in circulation, please inform me whether any European Union limit on emissions of naphthaline sulphonate exists.
Če je odgovor da: na kakšen način nadzoruje Komisija upoštevanje mejnih vrednosti v državah članicah?
If so, how does the Commission monitor Member States' compliance with it?
Če je odgovor ne: ali Komisija načrtuje uvedbo tovrstnih mejnih vrednosti?
If not, will the Commission introduce such a limit?
Ali so zadevne vsebine že bile posredovane Komisiji in je zatem sprožila raziskavo o tem, ali pristojni avstrijski organi izpolnjujejo vse zahteve, ki izhajajo iz pravnih predpisov EU o ohranjanju kakovosti površinskih voda, še posebej ob upoštevanju Helsinške konvencije o varstvu in uporabi čezmejnih vodotokov in mednarodnih jezer iz leta 1992?
Has the Commission received any request on this subject, and has the Commission responded by instituting an investigation into how the Austrian authorities are complying with all their obligations under EU law on protecting the quality of surface waters, with particular reference to the 1992 Helsinki Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes?
PISNO VPRAŠANJE P-2700/06
WRITTEN QUESTION P-2700/06
predložil a Mojca Drčar Murko (ALDE)
by Mojca Drčar Murko (ALDE)
(13. junij 2006)
(13 June 2006)
Zadeva: Načrtovana postavitev terminalov v Tržaškem zalivu
Subject: Plan to site gas terminals in the Gulf of Trieste
Ali je Komisiji znano, da v italijanskem delu Tržaškega zaliva v neposredni soseščini Slovenije načrtujejo gradnjo dveh terminalov za pretovor utekočinjenega zemeljskega plina?
Is the Commission aware of the plan to construct two terminals for transhipment of liquefied natural gas in the Italian part of the Gulf of Trieste in the immediate vicinity of Slovenia?
Tržaški zaliv zaradi majhnosti ni primeren za postavitev tako obsežnih naprav, ne da bi nastala škoda za morsko okolje.
The Gulf of Trieste is too small to be an appropriate site for such major installations without harming the marine environment.
Čeprav si Tržaški zaliv delita Italija in Slovenija, obe članici EU, Slovenija ni bila ne obveščena in ne povabljena k sodelovanju pri ocenjevanju vplivov teh načrtovanih naprav na okolje.
Despite the fact that the Gulf of Trieste is shared by Italy and Slovenia, both of which are EU Member States, Slovenia has neither been informed of nor invited to participate in an assessment of the environmental impact of these planned installations.
Naprava bo zaradi tehnološkega postopka ponovnega uplinjanja povzročila znižanje temperature morja v zalivu; po analizi Univerze v Trstu za dve stopinji Celzija.
As a result of the regasification process, the installations will cause a lowering of the sea temperature in the Gulf; by two degrees Celsius according to an analysis carried out by the University of Trieste.
Fizične in biološke posledice ohladitve morja so tem bolj obsežne, čim bolj plitka je voda in čim šibkejši so morski tokovi.
Furthermore, the shallower the water and the weaker the currents, the more pronounced are the physical and biological consequences of a cooling of the sea.
Potencialno je ogrožena tudi plovba, saj zaradi majhnosti zaliva ni mogoče vzpostaviti varnostnih pasov.
There is also a potential risk to shipping because the Gulf is too small to establish safety lanes.
Ali se Komisija strinja, da bi morala Italijanska republika upoštevati Direktivo 85/337/EEC UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
Does the Commission agree that Italy should comply with Directive 85/337/EEC OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
40 . , dopolnjeno z Direktivo 97/11/EC UL L 73, 14.3.1997, str.
40. , amended by Directive 97/11/EC OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
5 . o presoji vplivov določenih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje ter Direktivo 2001/42/EC UL L 197, 21.7.2001, str.
5. , on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment and with Directive 2001/42/EC OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p.
30 . o presoji vplivov nekaterih planov in programov na okolje, prav tako pa konvencijo o čezmejnih vplivih industrijskih nesreč?
30. on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment, as well as with the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents?
Ali omenjeni evropski zakonodajni oziroma mednarodni akti Italije ne zavezujejo k temu, da Slovenijo povabi k sodelovanju pri presoji učinkov obeh projektov na skupno morsko okolje?
Is it not the case that Italy is obliged under the aforementioned European legislation and international act to invite Slovenia to participate in assessing the impact of both projects on the two countries’ joint marine environment?
Ali je Komisija pripravljena opozoriti Italijo, da je pred končnim odločanjem zlasti treba pripraviti oceno tveganj za morski ekosistem Tržaškega zaliva kakor tudi upoštevati posledice za plovbo po njem?
Is the Commission prepared to warn Italy of the need to draw up a risk assessment for the marine ecosystem in the Gulf of Trieste and to take account of the consequences for shipping in the Gulf before any final decision is taken?
(25. julij 2006)
(25 July 2006)
Komisija se zaveda vprašanja, ki ga navaja cenjeni član, čeprav nima natančnih podatkov o projektu ali o trenutnem stanju postopkov izdaje zadevnih dovoljenj.
The Commission is aware of the issue referred to by the Honourable Member although it does not possess detailed information on the project, or the current stage of the relevant authorisation procedures.
V tem primeru se uporabljajo določbe Direktive Sveta 85/337/EGS UL L 175, 5.7.1985 . z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje (Direktiva EIA), kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 97/11/ES UL L 73, 14.3.1997 . z dne 3. marca 1997 in, glede sodelovanja javnosti in dostopa do sodišč, z Direktivo 2003/35/ES Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. maja 2003 UL L 156, 25.6.2003 . .
The provisions of Council Directive 85/337/EEC OJ L 175, 5.7.1985. of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (EIA Directive), as amended by Directive 97/11/EC OJ L 73, 14.3.1997. of 3 March 1997 and, with regard to public participation and access to justice, by Directive 2003/35/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 OJ L 156, 25.6.2003. will apply in this case.
V skladu s to direktivo mora biti soglasje za izvedbo projektov, ki bodo verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje, izdano šele po predhodni presoji vplivov teh projektov na okolje.
Under this directive, projects which are likely to have significant effects on the environment must undergo an assessment of their effects before development consent is granted.
Projekti za nadzemno skladiščenje zemeljskega plina spadajo v Prilogo II(3)(c) Direktive EIA.
Projects for the surface storage of natural gas fall within Annex II(3)(c ) of the EIA Directive.
Za projekte, vključene v Prilogo II, morajo organi držav članic v postopku pregleda ugotoviti, ali bodo verjetno pomembno vplivali na okolje; v tem primeru je treba opraviti presojo vplivov na okolje.
For projects included in Annex II, Member States authorities must determine, in a procedure called ‘screening’, if they are likely to have significant effects on the environment, in which case an EIA is required.
Pri tej ugotovitvi je treba upoštevati pomembna merila za pregled iz Priloge III Direktive EIA.
In this determination, the relevant screening criteria listed in Annex III of the EIA Directive must be taken into account.
Ta vključujejo občutljivost okolja na območjih, za katera obstaja verjetnost, da bo projekt nanje vplival (posebna pozornost se med drugim namenja obalnim območjem), in čezmejno naravo vpliva.
These include the environmental sensitivity of the areas likely to be affected by the project (paying particular attention to coastal zones, amongst other issues) and the transfrontier nature of the impact.
Direktiva EIA v EU uveljavlja Konvencijo o presoji čezmejnih vplivov na okolje (Konvencija iz Espooja).
The EIA Directive applies in the EU the Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context (the Espoo Convention).
Če obstaja verjetnost, da bo projekt pomembno vplival na okolje v drugi državi članici, je treba pri izvajanju presoje vplivov na okolje opraviti čezmejna posvetovanja kot del postopka presoje vplivov na okolje.
When an EIA is carried out, if the project is likely to have significant environmental effects on the environment in another Member State, transboundary consultations must take place as part of the EIA procedure.
Ta posvetovanja lahko izvede država članica, na katere ozemlju se načrtuje izvedba projekta, ali pa se izvedejo na zahtevo prizadete države članice.
These consultations can be initiated by the Member State in whose territory the project is intended to be carried out, or upon request of the affected Member State.
Rezultate teh posvetovanj je treba upoštevati pri postopku za pridobitev soglasja za izvedbo.
The results of these consultations must be taken into consideration in the development consent procedure.
Komisija na tej stopnji nima razloga za domnevo, da se v tem primeru določbe Direktive EIA ne bodo pravilno uporabljale.
The Commission at this stage has no reason to assume that the provisions of the EIA Directive will not be correctly applied in this case.
Direktiva Seveso II Direktiva Sveta 96/82/ES o obvladovanju nevarnosti večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi, UL L 10, 14.1.1997, kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 2003/105/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 2003, UL L 345, 31.12.2003 . se pri takih terminalih uporablja glede na količino plina, ki jo vsebujejo: samo nekatere zahteve veljajo za terminale, ki vsebujejo 50 do 200 ton (obrate nižje stopnje); vse zahteve veljajo za terminale, ki vsebujejo več kot 200 ton (obrate višje stopnje).
The Seveso II Directive Council Directive 96/82/EC on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, OJ L 10, 14.1.1997, as amended by Directive 2003/105/EC of the Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2003, OJ L 345, 31.12.2003. applies to such terminals according to the quantity of gas present: only some requirements apply to terminals containing from 50 to 200 tonnes (lower tier establishments); all requirements apply to those terminals which contain more than 200 tonnes (upper tier establishments) .
Nekatere določbe Direktive se uporabljajo preden izvajalec začne gradnjo ali pred začetkom obratovanja.
Several provisions of the directive already apply before the operator commences construction or operation.
Določbe načrtovanja rabe prostora zahtevajo nadzor izbire lokacije novih obratov.
The land-use planning provisions require the control of siting of new establishments.
Države članice zagotovijo, da vsi pristojni organi in urbanistični organi, ki so odgovorni za odločitve na tem območju, sprožijo primerne posvetovalne postopke, da bi zagotovili tehnično svetovanje o tveganju, ki izhaja iz tega obrata, ko se sprejemajo odločitve.
Member States shall ensure that all competent authorities and planning authorities responsible for decisions in this area set up appropriate consultation procedures to ensure that technical advice on the risks arising from the establishment is available when decisions are taken.
Konvencija o čezmejnih učinkih industrijskih nesreč predvideva postopke, ki zagotavljajo, da so prizadete stranke uradno obveščene o vseh takih predlaganih ali obstoječih nevarnih dejavnostih.
The Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents provides for procedures to ensure that affected parties are notified of any such proposed or existing hazardous activity.
Na pobudo katere koli take stranke se zadevne stranke vključijo v razprave o ugotavljanju nevarnih dejavnosti, ki lahko povzročijo čezmejne učinke.
Parties concerned shall, at the initiative of any such party, enter into discussions on the identification of those hazardous activities that are, reasonably, capable of causing transboundary effects.
Kadar je nevarna dejavnost podvržena presoji vplivov na okolje v skladu s Konvencijo iz Espooja in presoja vključuje oceno čezmejnih učinkov industrijskih nesreč nevarne dejavnosti, ki se izvaja v skladu s Konvencijo industrijskih nesreč, izpolnjuje končna odločitev, sprejeta za namene Konvencije iz Espooja, ustrezne zahteve Konvencije industrijskih nesreč.
When a hazardous activity is subject to an environmental impact assessment in accordance with the Espoo Convention and that assessment includes an evaluation of the transboundary effects of industrial accidents from the hazardous activity which is performed in conformity with the terms of the Industrial Accidents Convention, the final decision taken for the purposes of the Espoo Convention shall fulfil the relevant requirements of the Industrial Accidents Convention.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE P-3423/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-3423/07
vlaga Ljudmila Novak (PPE-DE)
by Ljudmila Novak (PPE-DE)
(27. junij 2007)
(27 June 2007)
Zadeva: Pravice lastnikov gozdov
Subject: The rights of forest owners
Ali imajo lastniki gozdov v državah članicah Evropske unije pravico do kakršne koli denarne kompenzacije ali dohodka pri odlovu v njihovih gozdovih?
Do forest owners in EU Member States have the right to any financial compensation or income for hunting in their forests?
Fischer Boel v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mrs Fischer Boel on behalf of the Commission
(31. julij 2007)
(31 July 2007)
Komisija cenjeno članico obvešča, da vidike, povezane s pravicami do možnih finančnih nadomestil lastnikom gozdov za lov v njihovih gozdovih, ureja zadevna zakonodaja držav članic.
The Commission would like to inform the Honourable Member that aspects related to the rights for possible financial compensations to forest owners for hunting in their forests are governed by the relevant legislation of the Member States.
Pravo Skupnosti ne predvideva takšnih nadomestil.
Community law does not provide for such compensations.
V vsakem primeru Pogodba ES izrecno določa, da ne posega v lastninskopravno ureditev v državah članicah.
In any event, the EC Treaty explicitly foresees that it does not prejudice the rules in the Member States governing the system of property ownership.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE P-4836/07
WRITTEN QUESTION P-4836/07
Zadeva: Vremenska ujma v Sloveniji
Subject: Meteorological disaster in Slovenia
Kako se bo Komisija odzvala na zadnjo vremensko ujmo, ki je prizadela večji del Slovenije in povzročila šest smrtnih žrtev?
How does the Commission intend to respond to the recent meteorological disaster which affected a large part of Slovenia and claimed the lives of six people?
Komisija je seznanjena s silnim opustošenjem, ki so ga v Sloveniji 18. septembra 2007 povzročile izjemno huda vremenska ujma in poplave, ki so ji sledile, ter obžaluje, da je prišlo do smrtnih žrtev.
The Commission is aware of the vast devastation caused by extremely heavy rains and subsequent floods on 18 September 2007 in Slovenia and regrets that there were casualties involved.
Komisija je v stiku s slovenskimi organi glede možnosti finančne pomoči Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije (SSEU).
The Commission has been in contact with the Slovenian authorities in order to clarify any queries on possible financial support from the European Union Solidarity Fund (EUSF).
SSEU lahko v primeru večjih naravnih nesreč zagotovi finančno pomoč državam članicam in državam, vključenim v pogajanja o pristopu k EU, če je celotna neposredna škoda, ki jo je povzročila nesreča, večja od treh milijard EUR (v cenah leta 2002) ali 0,6 % bruto nacionalnega dohodka države, pri čemer se uporabi nižja od obeh vrednosti.
The EUSF can provide financial aid to Member States and countries engaged in accession negotiations to the EU in the event of a major natural disaster if total direct damage caused by the disaster exceeds EUR 3 billion (at 2002 prices) or 0.6 % of the country's gross national income, whichever is the lower.
Prag, ki se v letu 2007 uporablja za Slovenijo, je 164,27 milijona EUR.
The threshold applicable to Slovenia in 2007 is EUR 164.27 million.
Ob izpolnjevanju posebnih meril se v izjemnih primerih sredstva SSEU lahko uporabijo za nesreče, ki ne dosežejo običajnega praga.
In exceptional cases, if specific criteria are met, the Fund can be mobilised for disasters that do not reach the normal threshold.
Pogoj za uporabo sredstev Sklada je predložitev zahtevka nacionalnih organov zadevne države Komisiji v desetih tednih od datuma prve škode.
A condition for activating the Fund is an application by the national authorities of the State concerned to the Commission within 10 weeks of the date of the first damage.
Uredba Sveta Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2012/2002 z dne 11. novembra 2002 o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije ( UL L 311, 14.11.2002 ) of 11. o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije Komisiji ne omogoča dati pobude.
The Council regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund, OJ L 311, 14.11.2002. establishing the Solidarity Fund does not allow the Commission to take the initiative.
Kot je navedeno zgoraj, je Komisija v stiku s slovenskimi organi in je pripravljena pomagati na kakršen koli zaželen način.
As mentioned above, the Commission is in contact with the Slovenian authorities and stands ready to assist in any possible way required.
Finančna pomoč Solidarnostnega sklada je omejena na posebne vrste nujnih ukrepov, ki jih izvajajo javni organi, kot so ponovna usposobitev življenjsko pomembne infrastrukture, ureditev območja, zagotovitev začasne nastanitve ter financiranje reševalnih služb.
Financial assistance from the Solidarity Fund is limited to specific types of emergency operations carried out by the public authorities, such as reinstating vital infrastructures to working order, cleaning up, providing temporary accommodation or funding rescue services.
Škoda, ki ni javna in ki jo je mogoče zavarovati, na splošno ni upravičena do finančne pomoči.
Insurable non-public damage is generally not eligible for financial aid.
Kar zadeva razvoj podeželja, lahko v primeru naravnih nesreč države članice izvedejo posebne ukrepe za obnovo kmetijskih proizvodnih zmogljivosti ali gozdarskih proizvodnih zmogljivosti, poškodovanih ob naravnih nesrečah, in uvedejo tudi ustrezne preventivne ukrepe.
As far as the rural development is concerned, in the occurrence of natural disasters, Member States may implement specific measures to restore agricultural production potential or forestry potential damaged by natural disasters and they may also introduce appropriate prevention actions.
Vendar je treba poudariti, da so navedeni posegi omejeni na obnovo proizvodnih zmogljivosti ter jih ni mogoče uporabiti za kritje nadomestitve izpada dohodka.
It has nevertheless to be noted that the abovementioned interventions would be limited to reconstitution of production potential and cannot be used to compensate income losses.
Slovenski program za razvoj podeželja za obdobje 2007–2013 ne predvideva izvajanja tega ukrepa.
The Slovenian rural development programme for the period 2007‑13 does not foresee implementing this measure.
Slovenske organe se poziva k predložitvi podrobnih podatkov o problemu in posvetovanju s Komisijo o obsegu navedenega ukrepa.
The Slovenian authorities are invited to present the details of the problem and to discuss with the Commission how far the abovementioned measure could be applied.
Kar zadeva neposredna plačila, člen 28(3)(c) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete ter o spremembi uredb (EGS) št. 2019/93, (ES) št. 1452/2001, (ES) št. 1453/2001, (ES) št. 1454/2001, (ES) 1868/94, (ES) št. 1251/1999, (ES) št. 1254/1999, (ES) št. 1673/2000, (EGS) št. 2358/71 in (ES) št. 2529/2001 ( UL L 270, 21.10.2003 ). določa, da lahko Komisija v skladu s postopkom upravljalnega odbora državo članico pooblasti, glede na proračunsko stanje, da pred 1. decembrom plača predplačila v višini do 50 % plačil (ali v višini do 80 % plačil v primeru, ko so predplačila že predvidena) v regijah, kjer so zaradi izjemnih razmer kmetje v hudih finančnih težavah.
As regards direct payments, Article 28(3) (c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001, OJ L 270, 21.10.2003. provides that in accordance with the management committee procedure, the Commission may authorise the Member State, subject to budgetary situation, to pay prior to 1 December advances up to 50 % of the payments (or 80 % in case advances have already been provided for) in regions where due to exceptional conditions farmers face severe financial difficulties.
Ta določba se lahko uporablja na zahtevo države članice.
This provision may be applied at Member States' request.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE P-6485/08
WRITTEN QUESTION P-6485/08
Zadeva: Raziskave celičnega zdravljenja z izvornimi celicami
Subject: Stem cell therapy research
Z glasovanjem o 7. okvirnem programu za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj je bilo leta 2007 omogočeno, da se večji delež proračunskih sredstev nameni raziskavam, še zlasti o novih načinih zdravljenja.
In 2007 the adoption of the 7th Research and Development Framework Programme allowed a larger portion of the budget to be allocated to research, including in the area of innovative therapies.
Komisija je prejela zahteve za subvencioniranje raziskovalnih projektov na področju celičnega zdravljenja z izvornimi celicami odraslega, zarodka ali pridobljenimi iz popkovnične krvi.
The Commission receives applications for grants for cell therapy research projects using adult and embryonic stem cells and stem cells obtained from umbilical cord blood.
Ali lahko Komisija v zvezi z omenjenim odgovori na vprašanja: 1.
Against this background, can the Commission answer the following questions: 1.
Ali ima pregled nad finančnim stanjem raziskav o celičnem zdravljenju, in sicer nad: —
Does it have the current state of play regarding funding of cell therapy research: —
številom financiranih projektov, ki potekajo v Evropi na področju raziskav o izvornih celicah odraslega, zarodka ali pridobljenih iz popkovnične krvi; —
the number of projects funded in Europe, broken down into research using adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells and umbilical cord blood stem cells respectively; —
zneski, namenjenimi za vsak projekt? 2.
the amount granted to each project? 2.
Koliko raziskovalnih projektov s tega področja še čaka na subvencije?
How many research projects in this area are currently awaiting grants?
Ali ima Komisija pregled nad zakonodajo, ki velja za to področje v posameznih državah članicah?
Does the Commission have an overview of the legislative framework in force in this area in each of the European countries?
Raziskovalni projekti na področju celičnega zdravljenja z izvornimi celicami odraslega, izvornimi celicami zarodka in izvornimi celicami, pridobljenimi iz popkovnične krvi, se podpirajo v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (7OP).
Cell therapy research projects using adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells and stem cells obtained from umbilical cord blood are being supported under the seventh framework programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7).
Trenutno, v drugem letu sedemletnega programa, so podatki za prvo leto popolni, dejavnosti za drugo leto pa še niso v celoti izvedene (glej odgovor na drugo vprašanje spodaj).
At this moment, in the second year of a seven-year programme, data is complete for the first year but activities for the second year are not fully implemented (see answer to Question 2 below).