natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je treba v okviru obstoječih institucij Skupnosti ali držav članic vzpostaviti evropsko usklajeno mrežo za dobro počutje živali, ki bo delovala na podlagi predlagane splošne zakonodaje o dobrem počutju živali; meni, da bi morala takšna mreža določiti eno institucijo kot usklajevalni organ, ki mora izpolnjevati naloge, določene za „centralni inštitut za usklajevanje“, naveden v omenjenem poročilu Komisije z dne 28. oktobra 2009; meni tudi, da takšen usklajevalni organ ne bi smel podvajati nalog Komisije ali drugih agencij, temveč bi moral postati orodje za podporo Komisiji, državam članicam, akterjem prehranske verige in državljanom v zvezi z usposabljanjem in izobraževanjem, najboljšimi praksami, informiranjem potrošnikov in komuniciranjem z njimi, podajanjem ocen in mnenj o prihodnjih zakonskih in političnih predlogih in njihovem vplivu na dobro počutje živali, ovrednotenjem standardov dobrega počutja živali na podlagi najnovejših razpoložljivih dognanj ter usklajevanjem sistema EU za preskušanje novih metod;
Considers that a European coordinated network for animal welfare should be set up under the existing Community or Member State institutions, and that its work should be based on the general animal welfare legislation proposed above; considers that such a network should designate one institution as the coordinating body, which should perform the tasks assigned to the ‘central coordination institute’ referred to in the aforementioned Commission communication of 28 October 2009; considers, furthermore, that such a coordinating body should in no way duplicate tasks of the Commission or other agencies, but should become a support tool providing assistance to the Commission, Member States, food chain actors and citizens regarding training and education, best practices, information and consumer communication and assessing and stating its views on future legislative and policy proposals and their impact on animal welfare, assessing animal welfare standards on the basis of the latest available knowledge and coordinating an EU system for testing new techniques;
meni, da je treba v primerni in resni obliki javnosti posredovati informacije o potrebah živali in ravnanju z njimi na podlagi znanstvenih spoznanj; meni, da bi morala evropska mreža referenčnih centrov skrbeti za izobraževanje in informiranje, saj je posredovanje znanja na podlagi standardiziranih meril kakovosti bistveno za preprečevanje skrajnih stališč;
Takes the view that, on the basis of scientific findings, the public should be provided with information about animals‘ needs and the correct ways of dealing with animals and that this should be done in an appropriate, serious-minded manner; considers that a European network of centres of reference should be responsible for implementing education and information measures, since imparting knowledge on the basis of standardised quality criteria is fundamental if people are to be prevented from developing extreme views;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej oceni stroške, ki jih imajo evropski proizvajalci zaradi ukrepov za dobro počutje živali, ter najpozneje leta 2012 predloži priporočila, smernice in druge potrebne ukrepe za obvladovanje manjše konkurenčnosti evropskih živinorejcev;
Calls on the Commission as soon as possible to assess the cost to European producers of animal welfare measures, and to propose in 2012 at the latest recommendations, guidelines and other necessary measures to tackle the loss of competitiveness of European livestock farmers;
poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotavljanje izobraževanja o konceptu dobrega počutja živali;
Calls on the Member States to take appropriate steps to ensure that the notion of animal protection and welfare is promoted via education;
meni, da je treba vzpostaviti ciljno usmerjen nadzorni sistem na osnovi ocene tveganja, ki bo osredotočen na objektivne dejavnike in v katerem bodo morale biti države članice z nadpovprečnim številom kršitev pripravljene na strožji nadzor;
Considers that the aim must be a purposeful monitoring system based on a risk analysis in which objective factors are central and in which Member States whose infringement rates are above average must expect to face more stringent checks;
poudarja, da neravnovesja v prehrambeni verigi, kot so opisana v sporočilu Komisije z naslovom Bolje delujoča veriga preskrbe s hrano v Evropi, večkrat postavijo primarne proizvajalce v podrejeni položaj; ugotavlja, da imajo primarni proizvajalci zaradi dodatnih stroškov, ki nastajajo v takih razmerah, omejeno možnost naložb;
Stresses that the imbalances in the food chain, as described in the Commission communication entitled ‘A better functioning food supply chain in Europe’, often place primary producers at a disadvantage; recalls that primary producers have limited scope for investment on account of the extra costs which this situation entails;
poudarja, da je treba v proračunu Evropske unije predvideti zadostna sredstva, ki bodo Komisiji omogočila opravljanje nadzornih nalog, podporo proizvajalcem, kjer je to potrebno, in zadržanje upada konkurenčnosti, s katerim se soočajo proizvajalci zaradi uvedbe novih in spreminjajočih se standardov dobrega počutja živali, pri čemer je treba upoštevati, da živinorejci stroškov teh standardov ne morejo prevaliti na prodajno ceno svojih proizvodov;
Stresses that the European Union budget must include sufficient appropriations to enable the Commission to perform its monitoring tasks, to support producers where necessary and to counter the loss of competitiveness faced by producers as a result of the adoption of new and changing animal welfare standards, bearing in mind that the cost of these standards is not passed on in the price received by farmers when they sell their products;
poudarja, da je treba na ravni Evropske unije še naprej izboljševati in krepiti konkurenčnost kmetijskega sektorja s spodbujanjem veljavnih predpisov o dobrem počutju živali in skladnosti z njimi, pa tudi v skladu z zahtevami za varstvo okolja;
Stresses that the competitiveness of the farming sector should continue to be improved and strengthened through the promotion of and compliance with the animal welfare rules in force, and also in accordance with environmental protection requirements;
poziva države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bodo vse kršitve pravil EU o dobrem počutju živali učinkovito in sorazmerno kaznovane ter da bodo pristojni organi v vsakem posameznem primeru poleg kazni zagotovili tudi obširne smernice in svetovanje ter ustrezne korektivne ukrepe;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that any violations of EU animal welfare rules result in effective and proportionate penalties, and that in each individual case these penalties are accompanied by comprehensive guidance and advice from the competent authorities and appropriate corrective actions;
poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za preprečevanje prihodnjih kršitev predpisov o dobrem počutju živali;
Calls on the Member States to take appropriate steps to prevent breaches of animal welfare regulations in the future;
pozdravlja bistveno zmanjšanje uporabe antibiotikov za živali v državah članicah, odkar je bila v EU prepovedana njihova uporaba za spodbujanje rasti, medtem ko so še vedno dovoljeni v ZDA in nekaterih drugih državah; pričakuje pa, da bodo Komisija in države članice odgovorno obravnavale rastoče težave z odpornostjo na antibiotike pri živalih; poziva Komisijo, naj zbira in analizira podatke o uporabi veterinarskih proizvodov, vključno z antibiotiki, da bi zagotovila učinkovito uporabo takšnih proizvodov;
Welcomes the considerable reduction in the use of antibiotics for animals in the Member States since their use as a growth promoter was banned in the EU, while still being allowed in the US and some other countries; expects, however, the Commission and the Member States to address the growing problem of antibiotic resistance in animals in a responsible way; calls on the Commission to collect and analyse data on the use of animal health products, including antibiotics, with a view to ensuring the effective use of such products;
poziva k oceni in nadaljnjemu razvoju projekta „The Animal Welfare Quality Project“, zlasti kar zadeva poenostavitev instrumenta in uporabo v praksi;
Calls for an assessment and further development of the Animal Welfare Quality Project, particularly as regards the instrument's simplification and practical application;
meni, da bo merjenje teh kazalnikov dobrega počutja živali pri uvoženih proizvodih zelo zapleteno; poudarja, da ti mehanizmi, katerih koristnost ali utemeljenost sicer ni sporna, ne smejo povzročiti izkrivljanja konkurence v škodo evropskih proizvajalcev;
Considers that it will prove complex to measure these animal welfare indicators in the case of imported products; stresses that, without calling into question their utility or validity, these tools should not distort competition to the detriment of European producers;
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi končnega poročila projekta „Animal Welfare Quality Project“ predlaga preskusno dobo za oceno počutja živali v Evropski uniji z metodami, določenimi v okviru tega projekta;
Calls on the Commission, on the basis of the final report of the Animal Welfare Quality Project, to propose a trial period for the assessment of animal welfare within the European Union using the methods developed in the Animal Welfare Quality Project;
poziva države članice, naj v zvezi s tem bolje izkoristijo možnosti za podporo uporabnim raziskavam ter naložbam v inovacije in posodobitve v zvezi z zdravstvenim varstvom živali, ki so na voljo v okviru sredstev Evropske unije za razvoj podeželja in sedmega okvirnega programa (2007–2013) generalnega direktorata za raziskave; države članice in Komisijo poziva tudi, naj zagotovijo več finančnih naložb v raziskave ter razvoj novih tehnologij in metod na področju dobrega počutja živali;
Calls on the Member States in this context to make better use of the opportunities for support for applied research and investment in innovation and modernisation beneficial to animal welfare which is available from EU rural development funds and DG Research's 7th Framework Programme (2007-2013); calls also on the Member States and the Commission to step up financial investment in research and the development of new technologies and techniques in the field of animal welfare;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj uporabijo vse sile za zagotovitev, da bodo smernice Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE) o dobrem počutju živali spodbujale dobre standarde skrbi za živali, ki primerno odražajo znanstvena spoznanja na tem področju;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to use their best efforts to ensure that the OIE guidelines on animal welfare encourage good standards of welfare that properly reflect the scientific evidence in this field;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 o kmetijstvu EU in podnebnih spremembah ( 2009/2157(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 May 2010 on EU agriculture and climate change ( 2009/2157(INI) )
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije „Prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam: izziv za evropsko kmetijstvo in podeželje“( SEC(2009)0417 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘Adapting to climate change: the challenge for European agriculture and rural areas’ ( SEC(2009)0417 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije „Vloga evropskega kmetijstva pri ublažitvi podnebnih sprememb“( SEC(2009)1093 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled ‘The role of European agriculture in climate change mitigation’ ( SEC(2009)1093 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 14. novembra 2007 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za varstvo tal in spremembi direktive 2004/35/ES UL C 282E, 6.11.2008, str.
having regard to its legislative resolution of 14 November 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC OJ C 282 E, 6.11.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2008 o trajnostnem kmetijstvu in bioplinu: potreba po spremembi zakonodaje EU UL C 66 E, 20.3.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2008 on sustainable agriculture and biogas: a need for review of EU legislation OJ C 66 E, 20.3.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. februarja 2009 o 2050: prihodnost se začenja danes - priporočila za prihodnjo celovito politiko EU o podnebnih spremembah UL C 67 E, 18.3.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 February 2009 entitled ‘2050: The future begins today – recommendations for the EU's future integrated policy on climate change’ OJ C 67 E, 18.3.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. marca 2009 o problematiki slabšanja stanja kmetijskih površin v EU in zlasti v južni Evropi: odziv prek instrumentov kmetijske politike EU Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0130 .
having regard to its resolution of 12 March 2009 on ‘the challenge of deterioration of agricultural land in the EU and in particular in southern Europe: the response through EU agricultural policy instruments’ Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0130 .
ob upoštevanju poročila o mednarodni oceni agronomske znanosti in tehnologije za razvoj (IAASTD), ki sta ga pripravili Organizacija združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo ter Svetovna banka in ki ga je podpisalo 58 držav;
having regard to the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology (IAASTD) report drawn up by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation and the World Bank and signed by 58 countries,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0060/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0060/2010 ),
ker so podnebne spremembe, ki so posledica dolgotrajnega kopičenja toplogrednih plinov v ozračju, znanstveno potrjeno dejstvo in imajo lahko hude posledice za ekosisteme,
whereas the climate change caused by the historical build-up of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the atmosphere is a scientifically established fact that may have a serious impact on ecosystems,
ker kmetijstvo spada med gospodarske dejavnosti, ki upravljajo naravne vire v korist človeštva in ga te posledice neposredno zadevajo,
whereas agriculture is directly affected, since it is one of the many economic activities that manage natural resources for the benefit of humankind,
ker so podnebne spremembe ena najhujših groženj za okolje, pa tudi za družbeni in gospodarski red, produktivnost kmetijskih kultur pa se zaradi močne občutljivosti na skrajna vremenska nihanja iz leta v leto spreminja, kar posredno vpliva na vse gospodarske sektorje, med katerimi je kmetijstvo najbolj občutljivo,
whereas climate change poses one of the most serious threats not only to the environment, but to the economy and society as well, with crop yields fluctuating from one year to the next, heavily influenced by the variation in extreme climate conditions, which has an implicit impact on every sector of the economy, although agriculture remains the most vulnerable,
ker kmetijstvo prispeva k podnebnim odklonom, saj je eden glavnih virov dveh pomembnih toplogrednih plinov (dušikovega oksida in metana), ki se sproščata pri različnih bioloških procesih kmetijske pridelave, obenem pa je izpostavljeno usodnim posledicam teh odklonov,
whereas agriculture, as one of the main sources of two major GHGs (nitrous oxide and methane) which are generated by various biological processes linked to agricultural production is contributing to climate change while also being very vulnerable to its adverse impact,
ker so se emisije toplogrednih plinov iz kmetijstva (vključno z živinorejo) v obdobju 1990–2007 v EU-27 zmanjšale za 20 % in ker je v Uniji delež kmetijstva pri emisijah toplogrednih plinov padel z 11 % v letu 1990 na 9,3 % v letu 2007, zlasti zaradi povečane učinkovitosti EU kmetijstva, stalnih inovacij in uporabe novih tehnik, učinkovitejše uporabe gnojil in zadnjih reform SKP,
whereas GHG emissions from agriculture (including livestock farming) declined by 20% in the EU-27 between 1999 and 2007 and the proportion of the Union's GHG emissions produced by agriculture dropped from 11% in 1990 to 9.3% in 2007, inter alia as a result of the increased efficiency of EU agriculture, constant innovations and the use of new techniques, the more effective use of fertilisers and the recent reforms of the CAP,
ker sta kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo glavna gospodarska sektorja, ki lahko zajemata CO2, ki nastaja zaradi človekovih dejavnosti, ter ga shranjujeta in skladiščita v zemlji zahvaljujoč se njuni sposobnosti zbiranja ter ga prek fotosinteze fiksirata v rastlinah; ker imata ta dva sektorja velike možnosti za pozitivno sodelovanje pri prizadevanjih za zmanjšanje segrevanja,
whereas agriculture and forestry are the main economic sectors able to capture the CO2 produced by human activities, to accumulate and store it in the soil by acting as sinks, and to fix it in plants through photosynthesis; whereas these sectors consequently have considerable potential to make a positive contribution to global warming mitigation efforts,
ker ima podnebno segrevanje že negativne posledice za kmetijstvo v EU (zmanjšanje vodnih virov, slanost in pogostejše suše, dezertifikacija, močno povečanje padavin pozimi in poplave na severu, ogroženost nižje ležečih obalnih območij zaradi naraščanja morske gladine in nevarnost zasoljevanja, nevihte in drugi skrajni vremenski pojavi, erozije in plazovi ter razmnoževanje uničevalnega mrčesa ter bolezni živali in rastlin itd.), pričakovano povečanje teh pojavov pa bo imelo hude gospodarske, socialne in okoljske posledice za kmetijski, gozdarski in turistični sektor,
whereas climate change is already having adverse effects on EU agriculture (including declining water resources, brackishness and more frequent drought, desertification, a significant increase in winter rainfall and flooding in the north, threats to low-lying coastal areas from rising sea levels and the danger of salination, storms and other extreme weather events, erosion and landslides and the proliferation of insect pests and animal and plant diseases), and whereas the expected acceleration of such problems could have serious economic, social and environmental repercussions for the agricultural, forestry and tourism sectors,
ker ima kmetijski sektor sposobnost prilagajanja na podnebne spremembe ter sposobnost, da ublaži njihove posledice, saj se opira na znanje kmetov, na močno skupno kmetijsko politiko ter na razvoj raziskav in inovacij, a so za to potrebni veliki napori, saj so naravni procesi težko obvladljivi,
whereas the agricultural sector is capable both of adapting and of mitigating climate change with the help of farmers‘ know-how, a strong CAP and research and innovation developments but, since the natural processes involved are difficult to deal with, a great deal of effort must be made,
ker je v evropskem kmetijstvu mnogo delovnih mest, ki jih je treba zaščititi in razvijati,
whereas European agriculture constitutes a pool of jobs which should be protected and expanded,
ker kmetijstvo ostaja ključno za ohranjanje človekove dejavnosti na evropskem podeželju, zlasti zaradi široke palete storitev, ki jih kmetje lahko opravljajo za preostalo družbo,
whereas agriculture remains vital to the continuance of human activity in European rural areas, inter alia because of the wide range of services which farmers can provide for the rest of society,
ker cilji Unije s področja razvoja energije iz obnovljivih virov neposredno zadevajo kmetijstvo in ker lahko ta razvoj v znatni meri prispeva k zmanjšanju toplogrednih plinov,
whereas the Union's objectives for the development of renewable energies have a direct bearing on agriculture, and whereas this development can help substantially to reduce GHG emissions,
ker je prehranjevanje prebivalstva Unije eden glavnih namenov kmetijstva EU,
whereas one of the primary functions of EU agriculture is to feed the Union's population,
ker mora imeti Unija vodilno vlogo v boju proti svetovnemu segrevanju,
whereas the Union should be a leader in the fight against global warming,
meni, da evropsko kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo lahko prispevata k dosegu ciljev Unije za blažitev podnebnih sprememb z nudenjem rešitev in pomoči za zmanjšanje svojih emisij toplogrednih plinov, spodbujanjem skladiščenja CO2 v zemlji, razvijanjem proizvodnje trajnostne energije iz obnovljivih virov ter najvišjim možnim povečanjem fotosinteze ; poudarja, da je treba spodbujati razvoj kmetijstva, ki zato, da poveča svojo trajnost, proizvaja tržno in netržno blago, kar se da učinkovito izrablja možnosti in naravne vire vseh ekosistemov ter združuje gospodarske, okoljske in socialne potrebe in zahteve po dobrem počutju živali;
Affirms that EU agriculture and forestry can contribute to achieving the Union's climate change mitigation objectives by finding ways and support to help reduce its GHG emissions, promoting CO2 sequestration in the soil, developing the production of sustainable renewable energies, and maximising the photosynthesis function; emphasises that, to this end, it is essential to foster the development of an agriculture producing tradable and non tradable goods which exploit the potential and natural resources of each ecosystem as efficiently as possible and which reconcile economic, environmental and social performance as well as animal welfare imperatives so as to improve its sustainability;
poudarja, da je ob morebitnem aktivnejšem sodelovanju kmetijstva v svetovnem procesu omejevanja podnebnih sprememb treba poskrbeti, da ne bo trpela konkurenčnost kmetijske in živilske industrije EU na svetovnem trgu;
Considers that, if agriculture is to be more actively involved in the global process of curbing climate change, care must be taken to ensure that the competitive position of the EU's agri-foodstuffs sector in the world market does not suffer;
meni, da so ekološko kmetovanje, ekstenzivna paša in integrirana pridelava nadomestni načini bolj ekološke kmetijske proizvodnje; vendar poudarja, da je treba najti rešitev in tradicionalnemu kmetijstvu, ki zavzema največji del evropskih obdelovalnih površin, omogočiti, da bistveno prispeva k trajnostnemu ravnanju z okoljem;
Takes the view that organic farming, extensive grazing and integrated pest management practices are among the ecologically effective systems needing further development; emphasises, however, the need to find ways to facilitate a transition to more sustainable agriculture in the case of the other systems used on most farmland;
meni, da morajo inovacije imeti pomembnejšo vlogo pri zmanjševanju vpliva kmetijstva na podnebne spremembe in okolje;
Recognises that innovation has a major role to play in reducing the impact agriculture has on climate change and in lowering its environmental impact;
zlasti zahteva, da prihodnja skupna kmetijska politika prek informativnih dejavnosti in z izobraževanjem ter s spodbujevalnimi ukrepi podpira oblike izboljšanja učinkovitosti in zmožnosti zmanjšanja izpustov toplogrednih plinov v kmetijstvu in vezave ogljika, kot so:
Calls, in particular, for the future CAP to encourage – through the provision of information, training and incentives – practices that contribute to improving the efficiency of agriculture and its potential to reduce GHG emissions, and to improving carbon sequestration, including: