natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se seznani s predlogi, ki jih je Komisija navedla pod označbami blaginja, solidarnost, varnost in zunanje pobude; se strinja, da mora EU še naprej kot prednostno nalogo obravnavati Lizbonsko strategijo, zlasti trajnostni razvoj, gospodarsko rast, delovna mesta, konkurenčnost ter mala in srednje velika podjetja ter socialno kohezijo; meni, da so ti predlogi pogosto primer bolj prilagodljivega pristopa EU k reševanju resničnih izzivov, s katerimi se soočajo evropski državljani, kot je na primer področje energetske politike in podnebnih sprememb; poudarja pa, da je zaradi majhnih rezerv v okviru različnih zgornjih meja odhodkov zmožnost EU, da se odzove na politične spremembe v proračunskem smislu zelo omejena;
Notes the proposals indicated by the Commission under the labels prosperity, solidarity, security, external projection; agrees that, at the same time, the EU must maintain its focus on the Lisbon agenda and specifically on sustainable development, growth and jobs, competitiveness and SMEs, and social cohesion; considers that, in many cases, such as the area of energy policy and climate change, these proposals are an example of a more flexible approach by the EU to engaging with the real challenges that European citizens face; points out however that, as a result of very small margins under the different ceilings of expenditure, the EU's capacity to react to policy changes in budgetary terms is extremely limited;
meni, da je kot proračunski organ odgovoren za učinkovito porabo proračunskih sredstev EU, zlasti tistih, ki so omejena; želi, da se proračun pripravlja z vidika rezultatov in temelji na pristopu, ki je bil uveden v okviru proračuna za leto 2007 v sodelovanju s specializiranimi odbori;
Considers it its responsibility as budgetary authority to ensure that the funding allocated to the EU budget is spent with a view to delivering value for money, in particular to optimise the limited resources; intends to pursue a budget for results building on the approach initiated in the 2007 budget in cooperation with the specialised committees;
ponovno poziva k določitvi letnih političnih prednostnih nalog tako, da jih bo možno čim bolj učinkovito sporočiti državljanom Evrope in poudarja, da ta resolucija navaja stališče Evropskega parlamenta v zvezi s prihodnjim proračunskim postopkom; obžaluje, da letna politična strategija ne odraža ustrezno prednostnih nalog Parlamenta; pričakuje, da bo resolucija ustrezno upoštevana v predhodnem predlogu proračuna za leto 2008; poudarja, da je treba različne pobude, ki jih predlaga Komisija v letni politični strategiji za leto 2008, obravnavati v okviru nedavno sprejetih programov porabe in političnih prednostnih nalog, ki so podlaga za skupna finančna sredstva, določena v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 za večletni finančni okvir 2007-2013;
Reiterates its call for the EU's annual policy priorities to be set out in a manner that can be effectively communicated to the citizens of Europe and stresses that this resolution sets out the views of the European Parliament as regards the forthcoming budgetary procedure; strongly regrets that the Annual Policy Strategy (APS) does not adequately reflect Parliament´s priorities; expects to see due account taken of this resolution in the 2008 preliminary draft budget (PDB); emphasises that the various initiatives proposed by the Commission in the 2008 APS should be seen in the context of the very recently agreed spending programmes and political priorities that underpin the overall financial envelopes agreed for the 2007-2013 MFF in the IIA of 17 May 2006;
se seznanja s predstavitvijo komisarke Wallströmove pred konferenco predsednikov 8. februarja 2007 o o zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2007, vendar obžaluje pomanjkljivo povezovanje med zakonodajnim delovnim programom in proračunskim postopkom; v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom o razmerju med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo vztraja pri boljši povezavi med obema postopkoma; opozarja Komisijo na obveznost, ki jo je sprejela med proračunskim postopkom za leto 2007 in na pismo predsednika Barrosa decembra 2006 o boljši usklajenosti zakonodajnih prednostnih nalog in proračunskih odločitev; s tem v zvezi se seznanja s prednostnimi nalogami, ki jih je Komisija določila v sporočilu o letni politični strategiji ter pričakuje, da jih bo Komisija prilagodila v skladu z odločitvami proračunskega organa v toku letnega postopka;
Notes the presentation by Commissioner Wallström to the Conference of Presidents on 8 February 2007 on the Commission's legislative and work programme for 2007 but regrets the lack of interaction between the Legislative Work Programme and the budget procedure; in line with the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, insists upon a better coherence between the two procedures; reminds the Commission of its commitment made during the 2007 budget procedure and the letter from President Barroso of December 2006 concerning an improved matching of legislative priorities and budgetary decisions; in this context, takes note of the Commission priorities set out in the APS Communication and expects the Commission to adjust these priorities on the basis of the decisions to be taken by the budgetary authority in the course of the annual procedure;
znova poudarja pomen dejstva, da programi porabe Evropske unije učinkovito uresničujejo politične cilje, ki so jim dodeljeni; meni, da je legitimnost EU v očeh njenih državljanov vedno temeljila na uresničevanju politik in jasnih dokazih za slednje; zato poudarja svoj namen, upoštevati pri svojem delu za proračun 2008 načelo "proračuna, usmerjenega v rezultate"; poudarja, da se rezultati ne bodo ocenjevali le na podlagi računovodskih meril ter poudarja, da se bo ta pristop izvajal v duhu dobrega medinstitucionalnega sodelovanja;
Underlines once again the importance that it attaches to EU spending programmes effectively delivering on the political objectives which they were legislated to achieve; considers that policy delivery, and clear evidence thereof, has always been fundamental to the legitimacy of the EU in the eyes of its citizens; affirms its intention, therefore, to give to its work on the 2008 budget the philosophy of a 'budget for results'; stresses that those results will not be assessed solely on the basis of accounting criteria and points out that this approach will be followed in a spirit of sound interinstitutional cooperation;
kot prvi korak do proračuna, usmerjenega v rezultate, poudarja pomen jasnosti, doslednosti in preglednosti predstavitve proračuna; podpira pristop oblikovanja proračuna po dejavnostih, katerega cilj je zagotoviti usklajenost finančnih in človeških virov s političnimi cilji v skladu s področji porabe Komisije; ugotavlja, da nomenklature, ki je značilna za pripravo proračuna po dejavnostih, ni lahko uskladiti s kategorijami razdelkov večletnega finančnega okvira; poleg tega obžaluje, da klasifikacije letne politične strategije "blaginja, solidarnost, varnost in zunanje pobude" pomenijo tretji klasifikacijski sistem, ki je glede klasifikacije področij politike po posameznih poglavjih precej enostranski, in nima večje vrednosti s proračunskega vidika ter ga je težko uskladiti s kategorizacijami proračuna po dejavnostih in večletnim finančnim okvirom; zahteva, da Komisija bolj spoštuje strukturo proračuna po dejavnostih in večletni finančni okvir ter zagotavlja jasne pokazatelje usklajenosti med tretjo klasifikacijo in proračunskimi postavkami Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006;
As a first step towards a budget for results, stresses the importance of clarity, consistency and transparency in the presentation of the budget; supports the Activity based budgeting (ABB) approach, which aims to match financial and human resources to political objectives according to the policy areas of Commission spending; notes that the ABB nomenclature is not easily reconciled with the categories of the MFF headings; further regrets that the APS classifications of prosperity, solidarity, security and external projection represent a third classification system that is rather arbitrary as regards the classification of policy areas under the different chapters, does not have any major value from a budgetary perspective and cannot easily be reconciled with the ABB and MFF categorisations; demands that the Commission respect more closely the ABB and MFF structures and provide clear indications on the correspondence between this third classification and the budgetary headings of the IIA of 17 May 2006;
meni, da so poročila o dejavnostih, ki jih Komisija izda za vsako področje politike v predhodnem predlogu proračuna, ključni element za učinkovit nadzor proračunskega organa nad porabo EU; poudarja, da učinkovita ocena politik ni mogoča, če politični cilji niso jasni; zahteva, da se v predhodnem predlogu proračuna 2008 izboljša jasnost predstavitve poročil o dejavnosti; zahteva večjo osredotočenost na politične cilje in merjenje političnih rezultatov ter manj informacij o upravnih postopkih, kar je bil pogost pojav v predhodnih dokumentih predhodnega predloga pročana;
Considers that the Activity Statements produced by the Commission for each policy area in the PDB constitute a key element in the effective oversight of EU spending by the budgetary authority; underlines that, if policy objectives are not clear, then effective policy evaluation is impossible; requests an improvement in the clarity of presentation of these Activity Statements in the 2008 PDB; demands greater focus on policy objectives and measurement of policy outcomes and less information on administrative process than has frequently been the case in previous PDB documents;
poudarja pomen spremljanja proračunskega izvrševanja kot sredstva za oceno uresničevanja politik; pozdravlja nedavna izboljšanja pri zagotavljanju podatkov o izvrševanju s strani Komisije, zlasti sistema obveščanja o proračunskih napovedih; ugotavlja, da bodo podatki o izvrševanju za prvo leto porabe novih programov v obdobju 2007–2013 na voljo med letom 2007 zaradi obveščanja o proračunski napovedi; meni, da bi se te informacije lahko izkazale za koristne pri spodbujanju Komisije in držav članic, da v celoti upoštevajo politične prednostne naloge Parlamenta, opredeljene v proračunu za leto 2007 in v tej resoluciji;
Underlines the importance of monitoring budget implementation as a tool for examining the delivery of policy; welcomes the recent improvements in the provision of data on implementation by the Commission and in particular the Budget Forecast Alert (BFA) system; notes that due to the BFA, initial implementation figures for the first year of spending of the new programmes for 2007-2013 will become available during 2007; considers that this information may prove useful in pushing the Commission and the Member States to respect fully the Parliament's political priorities defined in the 2007 budget and in this resolution;
odločno zavzema stališče, da je treba za učinkovit in stroškovno učinkovit upravni sistem Evropske unije nameniti potrebne vire; z zanimanjem pričakuje rezultate analize, ki so jo izvedle službe Komisije o dejanskih kadrovskih potrebah Komisije, ki mora biti predstavljena do 30. aprila 2007; je prepričan, da je analiza kadrovskih potreb Komisije ključna, ker bo Komisiji omogočala ugotavljanje dejanskih zmogljivosti ter zagotavljanje več osebja za nove politične prednostne naloge, kot so energetika, podnebne spremembe, priseljevanje, izvajanje večletnih programov in prenos zakonodaje EU v države članice; temeljito bo ocenila izid analize za soočanje s prihodnjimi izzivi, ki se začnejo s proračunskim postopkom za leto 2008;
Is strongly of the view that an effective and cost-efficient administrative system for the European Union must be equipped with the necessary level of resources; awaits with interest the results of the screening exercise being carried out by the Commission services on the Commission's real staff needs that is due to be presented on 30 April 2007; is convinced that this screening of Commission staff is a key exercise allowing the Commission to identify its real potential and to provide more staff for the new political priorities such as energy, climate change, immigration, the implementation of multi-annual programmes and oversight of the transposition of EU law in the Member States; will evaluate the outcome of the screening in great depth in order to meet future political challenges starting from the 2008 budget procedure;
pozdravlja dodatne navedbe v letni politični strategiji 2008 o prizadevanjih Komisije za preusmeritev svojih človeških virov v politične prednostne naloge, a zavrača razporeditev teh prednostnih nalog med označbe "blaginja, solidarnost, varnost in zunanje pobude"; zato zahteva od Komisije, da v predhodnem predlogu proračuna jasno navede, v skladu s strukturo proračuna po dejavnostih, dodatne informacije o politiki človeških virov in strategiji premestitev za leto 2008, ob upoštevanju rezultatov analize;
Welcomes the further indications in the 2008 APS of the Commission's efforts to re-direct its human resources towards political priorities but rejects the presentation of these priorities according to the labels prosperity, solidarity, security and external projection; therefore requests the Commission to set out clearly in the PDB, according to the ABB structure, further information regarding human resources policy and redeployment strategy for 2008, taking into account the results of the screening exercise;
je zaskrbljen, da bo razširitev obstoječih decentraliziranih agencij zmanjšala rezerve v razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira; je poleg tega zaskrbljen, da bo zmanjšanje obstoječih rezerv zmanjšalo obseg financiranja novih prednostnih nalog, kot so pilotni projekti in pripravljalni ukrepi, ter tudi obseg financiranja za razširitev obstoječih programov; ugotavlja, da točka 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 zavezuje Komisijo, da oceni proračunske posledice za zadevni razdelek odhodkov pri pripravi predloga o ustanovitvi novih decentraliziranih agencij; bo poskušal zagotoviti, da bo delovanje decentraliziranih agencij prinašalo dodano vrednost ter koristilo interesom državljanov EU;
Expresses its concern that the expansion of existing decentralised agencies will reduce the margins available under the headings of the MFF; is further concerned that this reduction in available margins will reduce the scope for funding new priorities, such as pilot projects and preparatory actions, and will also reduce the funds available for the expansion of existing programmes; notes that point 47 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 obliges the Commission to assess the budgetary implications for the expenditure heading concerned when drawing up a proposal for the creation of a new decentralised agency; will seek to ensure that the functioning of decentralised agencies brings added value and furthers the interests of EU citizens;
ugotavlja, da se mora vsaka nadaljnja širitev števila izvršilnih agencij in drugih organov financirati iz ustreznega finančnega okvira; zato je zaskrbljen, da bo vsaka nadaljnja rast števila izvršilnih agencij in drugih organov zmanjšala operativna sredstva, ki so na voljo v finančnem okviru;
Notes that any further expansion in the number of executive agencies and other bodies would need to be financed from the relevant programme envelope; expresses its concern, therefore, that any further growth in executive agencies and other bodies may reduce the operational funds available within programme envelopes;
je odločen pojasniti opredelitev, vlogo in stroške vseh organov, ki so opredeljeni v členu 185 finančne uredbe, za oceno stroškovne učinkovitosti takega načina upravljanja ter da se med proračunskim postopkom za leto 2008 sistematično na medinstitucionalni ravni zagotovi uporaba postopka, določenega v točki 47 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006;
Is determined to clarify the definition, the role and the cost of all bodies defined under Article 185 of the Financial Regulation, to assess the cost-effectiveness of such modes of governance and to secure on a systematic basis at interinstitutional level the application of the procedure laid down in point 47 of the IIA of 17 May 2006 in the course of the 2008 annual budget procedure;
meni, da sta decentralizacija odgovornosti na posamezne generalne direktorate in osebna odgovornost uradnikov EU pomemben sestavni del pristopa upravljanja na podlagi dejavnosti; ugotavlja, da bi lahko bilo potrebno dodatno delo za pojasnitev nekaterih verig odgovornosti znotraj institucij EU; meni, da je to vprašanje posebnega pomena ob upoštevanju očitnega razvoja v smeri "zunanjega izvajanja" nalog izvrševanja, prenesenih na izvršilne agencije in druge ad hoc organe;
Considers that decentralisation of responsibilities to the different Directorates-General and personal responsibility of EU officials are an important element of the Activity-based management approach; notes that further work may be necessary to clarify some of the chains of responsibility within the EU institutions; considers that this issue is of particular importance in light of the apparent trend towards 'outsourcing' or 'externalisation' of implementation tasks to executive agencies and other ad hoc bodies;
je zaskrbljen, da bi ustanovitev izvršilnih agencij in drugih ad hoc organov lahko privedla do povečanja števila uradnikov in pogodbenih uslužbencev EU ter do poslabšanja nadzora nad upravo EU, razen če bi se število delovnih mest v ustreznem generalnem direktoratu Komisije zmanjšalo in bi se tako povečanje izravnalo; zahteva, da Komisija v PPP 2008 razloži, kako bodo zahtevana delovna mesta v novih izvršilnih agencijah in drugih ad hoc organih nadomeščena z zmanjšanjem števila delovnih mest v pristojnem generalnem direktoratu; poleg tega zahteva, da Komisija v predhodnem predlogu proračun za leto 2008 obravnava vprašanje ustreznega nadzora izvršilnih agencij in drugih ad hoc organov, da se zagotovi demokratična odgovornost; poziva k izboljšanju Kodeksa ravnanja o ustanovitvi izvršilnih agencij, zlasti glede parlamentarnega nadzora financiranja in zaposlovanja v agencijah;
Is concerned that the creation of executive agencies and other ad hoc bodies may lead to a growth in the number of EU officials and contractual agents, unless posts in the relevant Commission Directorate-General are reduced to offset the increase, and to a weakening of the oversight of the EU administration; requests the Commission to explain in the 2008 PDB how posts requested in new executive agencies and other ad hoc bodies will be offset by reductions in the responsible Directorate-General; further requests the Commission to address in the 2008 PDB the issue of appropriate oversight of executive agencies and other ad hoc bodies so as to ensure democratic accountability; urges an improvement of the Code of Conduct on the Setting-up of Executive Agencies, in particular as regards parliamentary scrutiny of financing and staffing of the agencies;
Večletni finančni okvir – načrtovanje, rezerve, koncentracija proračunskih sredstev na začetku in koncu programskega obdobja
Multiannual Financial Framework - programming, margins, front- and back-loading
je seznanjen z zadnjo posodobitvijo finančnega načrtovanja Komisije za obdobje 2007–2013; ugotavlja omejene in v nekaterih primerih zmanjšajoče se rezerve v razdelkih 1a in 3 ter odločno nasprotuje predlogu Komisije, da se nizke rezerve, ki so še na voljo v omenjenih razdelkih, namenijo za nove pobude; je zaskrbljen nad dejstvom, da bi nove rezerve nastale zlasti s prenosom obstoječih večletnih programov na konec proračunskega obdobja; meni, da nizke rezerve omejujejo učinkovito reševanje vsakega nujnega ali novega političnega prednostnega vprašanja; poziva Komisijo, da na naslednjem trialogu predstavi pregled nad rezervami v različnih razdelkih ter posodobljen finačni načrt v skladu s točko 46 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, in morebitne finančne posledice predloga, predvidenega v zakonodajnem programu,
Takes note of the Commission's latest update of the financial programming 2007-2013; notes the limited, and in some cases decreasing, margins left under headings 1a and 3 and strongly opposes the Commission's proposal to use the small margins left available under these two headings for new initiatives; expresses its strong concern that additional margins would be created mainly by back-loading existing multiannual programmes; considers that the small margins limit the possibility of addressing efficiently any urgent or new political priority; asks the Commission to present at the next trialogue an overview of the margins in the different headings, and an update of the financial programming, in accordance with point 46 of the IIA of 17 May 2006, and the potential financial consequences of the proposals announced in the legislative programme;
želi proučiti možnosti za boljšo predstavitev, za lažje in boljše razumevanje posameznih finančnih načrtovanj in proračunskih dokumentov, namenjenih proračunskemu organu (finančno načrtovanje in dokument o letni strategiji politik); poudarja, da trenutno iz priloženih tabel ni mogoče razbrati niti katere spremembe so bile narejene glede na predhodni finančni načrt, niti kako so bila povečanja izravnana ali kako je bila izvedena koncentracija proračunskih sredstev na koncu in začetku programskega obdobja;
Wishes to explore possibilities for a better presentation, facilitating easier and better understanding of the different financial programming and budget documents provided to the budgetary authority (financial programming and APS document); points out that, at the moment, there is neither a clear indication of the exact changes made compared to the previous financial programming in the tables annexed to the financial programming nor a clear indication of how increases are being compensated for or how back- and front-loadings are taking place;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da morebitni vpliv sprememb, ki jih Komisija predlaga k finančnemu načrtovanju v oddelku III letne politične strategije za leto 2008 na že majhne rezerve in/ali operativne programe, zlasti kot posledico večjega financiranja agencij ali ustanovitve novih skladov; obžaluje, da so bili predlogi predloženi manj kot en mesec po zadnji posodobitvi finančnega načrtovanja; pričakuje, da bo Komisija te predloge predstavila pravočasno v okviru predhodnega predloga proračuna 2008 in prihodnjega finančnega načrtovanja, zlasti če bi pomenili spremembo večletnega finančnega okvira;
Notes with concern the possible impact of the changes that the Commission proposes to the financial programming in Section III of the 2008 APS on what are already small margins and/or operational programmes, especially as a result of increased funding for agencies or the creation of new funds; regrets that such proposals were presented less than one month after the most recent financial programming update; expects the Commission to present these proposals in due course in the 2008 PDB and next Financial Programming, especially if they would imply a change to the MFF;