natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Storitve splošnega ekonomskega pomena imajo pomembno nalogo v zvezi s socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo.
Services of a general economic interest are entrusted with important tasks relating to social and territorial cohesion.
Opravljanje teh nalog ne sme biti onemogočeno zaradi rezultatov postopka ocenjevanja, ki ga določa ta direktiva.
The performance of these tasks should not be obstructed as a result of the evaluation process provided for in this Directive.
Ta postopek ne bi smel vplivati na zahteve, ki so potrebne za opravljanje teh nalog, hkrati pa bi bilo treba obravnavati neupravičeno omejevanje svobode ustanavljanja.
Requirements which are necessary for the fulfilment of such tasks should not be affected by this process while, at the same time, unjustified restrictions on the freedom of establishment should be addressed.
Zahteve, ki jih je treba preučiti, vključujejo nacionalne predpise, ki zaradi razlogov, ki se ne nanašajo na poklicne kvalifikacije, posameznim ponudnikom preprečujejo začetek opravljanja nekaterih dejavnosti.
The requirements to be examined include national rules which, on grounds other than those relating to professional qualifications, reserve access to certain activities to particular providers.
Te zahteve vključujejo tudi obveznosti ponudnika, da prevzame določeno pravno obliko, zlasti da postane pravna oseba, podjetje v zasebni lasti, nepridobitna organizacija ali podjetje v izključni lasti fizičnih oseb, ter zahteve, ki se nanašajo na lastništvo delnic podjetja, zlasti obveznosti, ki določajo, da mora biti zagotovljen minimalni kapital za določene storitvene dejavnosti ali da morajo biti izpolnjene določene poklicne kvalifikacije za lastnike deležev ali vodstvo v določenih podjetjih.
These requirements also include obligations on a provider to take a specific legal form, in particular to be a legal person, to be a company with individual ownership, to be a non-profit making organisation or a company owned exclusively by natural persons, and requirements which relate to the shareholding of a company, in particular obligations to hold a minimum amount of capital for certain service activities or to have a specific qualification in order to hold share capital in or to manage certain companies.
Ocenjevanje združljivosti določene najnižje in/ali najvišje tarife s svobodo ustanavljanja zadeva samo tarife, ki so jih pristojni organi uvedli posebej za zagotavljanje nekaterih storitev, ne zadeva pa na primer splošnih predpisov o določanju cen, denimo v zvezi z najemom hiš.
The evaluation of the compatibility of fixed minimum and/or maximum tariffs with the freedom of establishment concerns only tariffs imposed by competent authorities specifically for the provision of certain services and not, for example, general rules on price determination, such as for the renting of houses.
Vsako poročilo bo predloženo vsem ostalim državam članicam in zainteresiranim strankam.
Each report will be submitted to all other Member States and interested parties.
Države članice bodo nato imele na voljo šest mesecev za predložitev pripomb v zvezi s temi poročili.
Member States will then have six months in which to submit their observations on these reports.
Komisija bi morala najpozneje eno leto po prenosu te direktive pripraviti zbirno poročilo in mu po potrebi priložiti predloge za nadaljnje pobude.
At the latest by one year after the date of transposition of this Directive, the Commission should draw up a summary report, accompanied where appropriate by proposals for further initiatives.
Komisija bo v sodelovanju z drugimi državami članicami po potrebi pomagala posamezni državi članici pri oblikovanju skupne metode.
If necessary the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, could assist them to design a common method.
Dejstvo, da ta direktiva opredeljuje številne zahteve, ki jih bodo države članice v obdobju prenosa odpravile ali ovrednotile, ne posega v postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, sprožene proti državam članicam zaradi neizpolnjevanja obveznosti iz členov 43 ali 49 Pogodbe.
The fact that this Directive specifies a number of requirements to be abolished or evaluated by the Member States during the transposition period is without prejudice to any infringement proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 or 49 of the Treaty.
Ta direktiva ne zadeva uporabe členov 28 do 30 Pogodbe o prostem pretoku blaga.
This Directive does not concern the application of Articles 28 to 30 of the Treaty relating to the free movement of goods.
Prepovedane omejitve v skladu z določbo o svobodi opravljanja storitev zadevajo zahteve glede začetka opravljanja ali opravljanja storitvenih dejavnosti in ne zahtev, ki veljajo za blago kot tako.
The restrictions prohibited pursuant to the provision on the freedom to provide services cover the requirements applicable to access to service activities or to the exercise thereof and not those applicable to goods as such.
Če izvajalec dejavnosti odpotuje v drugo državo članico, da bi tam opravljal storitveno dejavnost, bi bilo treba razlikovati med razmerami, ki sodijo v svobodo ustanavljanja, in tistimi, ki zaradi prehodne narave zadevne dejavnosti sodijo v prosti pretok storitev.
Where an operator travels to another Member State to exercise a service activity there, a distinction should be made between situations covered by the freedom of establishment and those covered, due to the temporary nature of the activities concerned, by the free movement of services.
Pri razlikovanju med svobodo ustanavljanja in prostim pretokom storitev je v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča ključno vprašanje, ali ima izvajalec dejavnosti sedež v državi članici, kjer opravlja zadevno storitev, ali ne.
As regards the distinction between the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services, according to the case law of the Court of Justice the key element is whether or not the operator is established in the Member State where it provides the service concerned.
Če ima sedež v državi članici, kjer opravlja svoje storitve, bi morala zanj veljati uporaba svobode ustanavljanja.
If the operator is established in the Member State where it provides its services, it should come under the scope of application of the freedom of establishment.
Če pa izvajalec dejavnosti nima sedeža v državi članici, kjer opravlja storitev, bi morale njegove dejavnosti soditi na področje prostega pretoka storitev.
If, by contrast, the operator is not established in the Member State where the service is provided, its activities should be covered by the free movement of services.
Na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča se za določanje začasnega značaja storitve ne bi smelo upoštevati le trajanje storitve, ampak tudi pogostost, rednost ponovitve ali neprekinjenost storitve.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that the temporary nature of the activities in question should be determined in the light not only of the duration of the provision of the service, but also of its regularity, periodical nature or continuity.
Začasni značaj storitve v nobenem primeru ne bi smel pomeniti, da ponudnik storitve v državi članici gostiteljici ne sme imeti določene infrastrukture (pri tem gre lahko za pisarno, odvetniško pisarno ali posvetovalnice), kolikor je ta potrebna za opravljanje zadevne storitve.
The fact that the activity is temporary should not mean that the provider may not equip itself with some forms of infrastructure in the Member State where the service is provided, such as an office, chambers or consulting rooms, in so far as such infrastructure is necessary for the purposes of providing the service in question.
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega izvajanja prostega pretoka storitev in za zagotavljanje, da lahko prejemniki in ponudniki uporabljajo in opravljajo storitve v vsej Skupnosti, ne glede na meje, je treba podrobneje razjasniti, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko uveljavijo zahteve države članice, kjer se opravlja storitev.
In order to secure effective implementation of the free movement of services and to ensure that recipients and providers can benefit from and supply services throughout the Community regardless of borders, it is necessary to clarify the extent to which requirements of the Member State where the service is provided can be imposed.
Nujno je treba zagotoviti, da določba o svobodi opravljanja storitev državi članici, v kateri se opravlja storitev, v skladu z načeli iz člena 16(1)(a) do (c) ne preprečuje uveljavljanja posebnih zahtev zaradi ohranjanja javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
It is indispensable to provide that the provision on the freedom to provide services does not prevent the Member State where the service is provided from imposing, in compliance with the principles set out in Article 16(1)(a) to (c), its specific requirements for reasons of public policy or public security or for the protection of public health or the environment.
Na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča država članica ohrani pravico do sprejetja ukrepov, s katerimi bi ponudnikom preprečila zlorabo načel notranjega trga.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that Member States retain the right to take measures in order to prevent providers from abusively taking advantage of the internal market principles.
Zlorabo s strani ponudnika bi bilo treba dokazati za vsak primer posebej.
Abuse by a provider should be established on a case by case basis.
Ponudnikom je treba zagotoviti, da lahko v primeru, ko zaradi opravljanja storitev potujejo v drugo državo članico, opremo, ki je bistvena za njihovo storitev, vzamejo s seboj.
It is necessary to ensure that providers are able to take equipment which is integral to the provision of their service with them when they travel to provide services in another Member State.
Predvsem je treba preprečiti primere, ko storitve ne bi bilo mogoče opravljati zaradi pomanjkanja opreme, in razmere, v katerih bi ponudniki utrpeli dodatne stroške – če na primer najamejo ali kupijo drugačno opremo od tiste, ki jo običajno uporabljajo, ali če morajo bistveno spremeniti način, na katerega običajno izvajajo svoje dejavnosti.
In particular, it is important to avoid cases in which the service could not be provided without the equipment or situations in which providers incur additional costs, for example, by hiring or purchasing different equipment to that which they habitually use or by needing to deviate significantly from the way they habitually carry out their activity.
Pojem opreme ne sme vključevati fizičnih predmetov, ki jih ponudnik priskrbi stranki, ki postanejo sestavni del fizičnega predmeta kot rezultat storitvene dejavnosti, na primer gradbeni material ali nadomestni deli, ali ki se med opravljanjem storitve uporabijo ali pustijo na mestu samem, na primer vnetljiva goriva, razstreliva, izdelki za ognjemete, pesticidi, strupi ali zdravila.
The concept of equipment does not refer to physical objects which are either supplied by the provider to the client or become part of a physical object as a result of the service activity, such as building materials or spare parts, or which are consumed or left in situ in the course of the service provision, such as combustible fuels, explosives, fireworks, pesticides, poisons or medicines.
Določbe te direktive ne bi smeli preprečiti državam članicam uporabe predpisov o pogojih zaposlovanja.
The provisions of this Directive should not preclude the application by a Member State of rules on employment conditions.
V skladu s Pogodbo bi morali biti predpisi, določeni v zakonih ali upravnih predpisih, utemeljeni z razlogi, ki se nanašajo na varstvo delavcev, nediskriminatorni, potrebni in sorazmerni, kot to razlaga Sodišče, ter v skladu z drugo ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti.
Rules laid down by law, regulation or administrative provisions should, in accordance with the Treaty, be justified for reasons relating to the protection of workers and be non-discriminatory, necessary, and proportionate, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, and comply with other relevant Community law.
Treba je zagotoviti, da se od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev lahko odstopa samo na področjih, za katera veljajo odstopanja.
It is necessary to ensure that the provision on the freedom to provide services may be departed from only in the areas covered by derogations.
Ta odstopanja so potrebna, da bi lahko upoštevali raven povezovanja notranjega trga ali določene instrumente Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na storitve in na podlagi katerih za ponudnika velja zakonodaja, ki ni zakonodaja države članice ustanovitve.
Those derogations are necessary in order to take into account the level of integration of the internal market or certain Community instruments relating to services pursuant to which a provider is subject to the application of a law other than that of the Member State of establishment.
Poleg tega bi morali biti v določenih posameznih primerih in pod določenimi strogimi postopkovnimi in vsebinskimi pogoji izjemoma sprejeti tudi ukrepi proti določenemu ponudniku.
Moreover, by way of exception, measures against a given provider should also be adopted in certain individual cases and under certain strict procedural and substantive conditions.
Poleg tega bi kakršno koli omejevanje prostega pretoka storitev moralo biti dovoljeno izjemoma in le če je v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami, ki tvorijo sestavni del splošnih načel prava, vsebovanega v pravnem redu Skupnosti.
In addition, any restriction of the free movement of services should be permitted, by way of exception, only if it is consistent with fundamental rights which form an integral part of the general principles of law enshrined in the Community legal order.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev, ki zadeva poštne storitve, bi moralo zajemati tako dejavnosti, pridržane za ponudnika univerzalne storitve, kot tudi druge poštne storitve.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services concerning postal services should cover both activities reserved to the universal service provider and other postal services.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev, ki se nanaša na sodne izterjave dolgov in sklic na morebitni prihodnji instrument za usklajevanje, bi moral zadevati samo začetek opravljanja in opravljanje dejavnosti, katerih naloga je predvsem vložitev tožb v zvezi z izterjavo dolgov pri sodišču.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services relating to the judicial recovery of debts and the reference to a possible future harmonisation instrument should concern only the access to and the exercise of activities which consist, notably, in bringing actions before a court relating to the recovery of debts.
Ta direktiva ne sme posegati v pogoje zaposlovanja, ki v skladu z Direktivo 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev UL L 18, 21.1.1997, str.
This Directive should not affect terms and conditions of employment which, pursuant to Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p.
veljajo za delavce, napotene na ozemlje druge države članice zaradi opravljanja storitve.
, apply to workers posted to provide a service in the territory of another Member State.
V takšnih primerih Direktiva 96/71/ES določa, da morajo ponudniki na naštetem številu področij upoštevati pogoje zaposlovanja, ki se uporabljajo v državi članici, kjer se opravlja storitev.
In such cases, Directive 96/71/EC stipulates that providers have to comply with terms and conditions of employment in a listed number of areas applicable in the Member State where the service is provided.
To so: maksimalno število delovnih ur in minimalni čas počitka, minimalni plačani dopust, najnižja plača, vključno s plačilom nadur, pogoji v zvezi z najemanjem delavcev, zlasti v zvezi z varstvom delavcev, ki se najamejo pri podjetjih za začasno zaposlovanje, zdravstveni, varnostni in higienski standardi na delovnem mestu, zaščitni ukrepi glede pogojev za zaposlovanje nosečnic ali žensk, ki so pred kratkim rodile, otrok in mladih, enakovredna obravnava moških in žensk ter druge določbe o nediskriminaciji.
These are: maximum work periods and minimum rest periods, minimum paid annual holidays, minimum rates of pay, including overtime rates, the conditions of hiring out of workers, in particular the protection of workers hired out by temporary employment undertakings, health, safety and hygiene at work, protective measures with regard to the terms and conditions of employment of pregnant women or women who have recently given birth and of children and young people and equality of treatment between men and women and other provisions on non-discrimination.
To ne zadeva le pogojev zaposlovanja, ki jih določa zakonodaja, ampak tudi tiste iz kolektivnih pogodb ali arbitražnih odločb, ki so uradno razglašene ali dejansko splošno veljavne v smislu Direktive 96/71/ES.
This not only concerns terms and conditions of employment which are laid down by law but also those laid down in collective agreements or arbitration awards that are officially declared or de facto universally applicable within the meaning of Directive 96/71/EC.
Poleg tega ta direktiva državam članicam ne sme preprečevati uporabe pogojev zaposlovanja v drugih zadevah, ki niso navedene v členu 3(1) Direktive 96/71/ES, iz razlogov javnega reda.
Moreover, this Directive should not prevent Member States from applying terms and conditions of employment on matters other than those listed in Article 3(1) of Directive 96/71/EC on the grounds of public policy.
Ta direktiva tudi ne bi smela vplivati na pogoje zaposlovanja v primerih, ko se delavca, zaposlenega za opravljanje čezmejne storitve, najame v državi članici, kjer se opravlja storitev.
Neither should this Directive affect terms and conditions of employment in cases where the worker employed for the provision of a cross-border service is recruited in the Member State where the service is provided.
Poleg tega ta direktiva ne bi smela vplivati na pravico države članice, v kateri se opravlja storitev, da opredeli delovno razmerje ter razlikovanje med samozaposlenimi osebami in zaposlenimi osebami, vključno z "lažnimi samozaposlenimi osebami".
Furthermore, this Directive should not affect the right for the Member State where the service is provided to determine the existence of an employment relationship and the distinction between self-employed persons and employed persons, including "false self-employed persons".
Določba o svobodi opravljanja storitev se ne bi smela uporabljati v primerih, ko je v državi članici v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti dejavnost pridržana za določen poklic, kot je to v primeru zahtev, da je pravno svetovanje pridržano za pravnike.
The provision on the freedom to provide services should not apply in cases where, in conformity with Community law, an activity is reserved in a Member State to a particular profession, for example requirements which reserve the provision of legal advice to lawyers.
Odstopanje od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev za zadeve, ki so v zvezi z registracijo vozil, zakupljenih v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri se uporabljajo, izhaja iz sodne prakse Sodišča, ki je potrdilo, da lahko država članica v skladu s sorazmernimi pogoji predpiše takšno obveznost za vozila, ki se uporabljajo na njenem ozemlju.
The derogation from the provision on the freedom to provide services concerning matters relating to the registration of vehicles leased in a Member State other than that in which they are used follows from the case law of the Court of Justice, which has recognised that a Member State may impose such an obligation, in accordance with proportionate conditions, in the case of vehicles used on its territory.
Pogodbeni odnosi med ponudnikom storitev in stranko kot tudi med delodajalcem in delojemalcem ne bi smeli biti predmet te direktive.
Contractual relations between the provider and the client as well as between an employer and employee should not be subject to this Directive.
Veljavni pravni red za pogodbene ali nepogodbene obveznosti ponudnika storitev bi morali določati predpisi mednarodnega zasebnega prava.
The applicable law regarding the contractual or non contractual obligations of the provider should be determined by the rules of private international law.
Državam članicam je treba izjemoma in za vsak posamezen primer posebej omogočiti, da glede ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici sprejmejo ukrepe, ki zaradi varnosti storitev odstopajo od določbe o svobodi opravljanja storitev.
It is necessary to afford Member States the possibility, exceptionally and on a case-by-case basis, of taking measures which derogate from the provision on the freedom to provide services in respect of a provider established in another Member State on grounds of the safety of services.
Vendar pa bi bilo mogoče takšne ukrepe sprejeti le, če ni usklajevanja na ravni Skupnosti.
However, it should be possible to take such measures only in the absence of harmonisation at Community level.
Do omejitev prostega pretoka storitev v nasprotju s to direktivo ne pride le zaradi ukrepov, ki veljajo za ponudnike, ampak tudi zaradi številnih ovir, s katerimi se prejemniki, zlasti potrošniki, srečujejo pri uporabi storitev.
Restrictions on the free movement of services, contrary to this Directive, may arise not only from measures applied to providers, but also from the many barriers to the use of services by recipients, especially consumers.
Ta direktiva nazorno navaja določene vrste omejitev, veljavnih za prejemnike, ki želijo uporabljati storitev ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici.
This Directive mentions, by way of illustration, certain types of restriction applied to a recipient wishing to use a service performed by a provider established in another Member State.
To vključuje tudi primere, ko morajo prejemniki storitev pridobiti dovoljenje pri njihovih pristojnih organih ali jim podati izjavo, da bi lahko prejemali storitev ponudnika, ki ima sedež v drugi državi članici.
This also includes cases where recipients of a service are under an obligation to obtain authorisation from or to make a declaration to their competent authorities in order to receive a service from a provider established in another Member State.
To ne zadeva splošnih sistemov dovoljenj, ki jih je tudi treba upoštevati pri uporabi storitve ponudnika, ki ima sedež v isti državi članici.
This does not concern general authorisation schemes which also apply to the use of a service supplied by a provider established in the same Member State.
Koncept finančne pomoči, namenjene uporabi določene storitve, se ne bi smel uporabljati za sisteme pomoči, ki jih dodelijo države članice, zlasti na socialnem področju ali v kulturnem sektorju, ki sta zajeta v predpisih Skupnosti o konkurenci, ali za splošno finančno pomoč, ki ni povezana z uporabo določene storitve, na primer za štipendije ali študentska posojila.
The concept of financial assistance provided for the use of a particular service should not apply to systems of aids granted by Member States, in particular in the social field or in the cultural sector, which are covered by Community rules on competition, nor to general financial assistance not linked to the use of a particular service, for example grants or loans to students.
V skladu z določbami Pogodbe o prostem pretoku storitev je prepovedana diskriminacija na podlagi državljanstva prejemnika ali njegovega nacionalnega ali lokalnega bivališča.
In accordance with the Treaty rules on the free movement of services, discrimination on grounds of the nationality of the recipient or national or local residence is prohibited.