natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da bo pomen zaščite živali za odgovorne bolj sprejemljiv, če bodo roki prilagajanja primerni, če se bo upoštevalo število glav živine in velikost gospodarstev in če ne bo nepotrebne birokracije pri nadzoru in dokumentaciji; meni, da je treba natančno preučiti možnosti, ki jih ponuja uporaba modernih tehnologij in postopkov;
Points out that setting appropriate implementation deadlines, which take account of the numbers of animals and the size of businesses involved and avoid unnecessary red tape in connection with inspections and documentation will help to ensure a greater acceptance of the importance of animal protection on the part of those responsible; considers that the opportunities presented by the use of modern technologies and methods need to be adequately explored;
poudarja tesne medsebojne vplive zaščite živali in njihovega zdravja; zato meni, da bi bilo treba Akcijski načrt izvajati tako, da bo večja zaščita živali tudi v prid zdravju živali, da si bo politika na področju zdravja živali vedno prizadevala tudi za izboljšanje zaščite živali in da bodo te izboljšave merljive;
Stresses that animal protection and animal health impact closely on each other; considers that the Action Plan should be implemented as far as possible in such a way as to ensure that, through greater animal protection, improvements in animal health are achieved and that animal health policy also always aims to bring about improvements in animal protection and that such improvements are measurable;
poziva Komisijo, naj v boju proti kužnim boleznim živali v večji meri upošteva vidike zaščite živali; meni, da bi moralo imeti cepljenje živali v nujnih primerih v določenih regijah kot strategija boja proti boleznim načeloma prednost pred usmrtitvijo velikega števila zdravih živali, vendar je treba pri tem upoštevati tudi odnos do cepljenja, ki se v posameznih državah članicah razlikuje, in njegove učinke na trgovino; meni, da je treba močneje izkoristiti tudi možnosti preventivne uporabe cepljenja, če je to tehnično izvedljivo; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja za ustrezno prilagoditev zadevnih pogodb Svetovne organizacije za zdravje živali (OIE), da bo pri proizvodih cepljenih živali manj trgovinskih omejitev;
Calls on the Commission to take greater account of animal protection aspects in the fight against animal diseases; considers that the vaccination of animals in certain regions in the case of emergencies is preferable to the killing of large numbers of healthy animals, albeit recognising the different attitudes to vaccination in each Member State and their potential effects on trade; considers moreover that, where technically possible, there ought to be greater scope for preventive vaccination; calls on the Commission to increase its efforts to adapt relevant treaties of the World Organisation for Animal Health (Office International des Epizooties, OIE) accordingly, so that there are fewer trade restrictions as regards products originating from vaccinated animals;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se zaščita živali pri skupni kmetijski politiki bolj upošteva; opozarja pa, da so birokratski stroški že zdaj veliko previsoki; nadalje obžaluje, da bo krčenje sredstev za politiko razvoja podeželja v praksi oteževalo financiranje pomoči, ki jo živinorejci prejemajo za prilaganje predpisom Skupnosti za dobro počutje živali; obžaluje, da rejci perutnine in prašičerejci ne bodo prejeli nadomestila za to, da upoštevajo predpise Skupnosti za varstvo živali v okviru zahtev sistemov navzkrižne skladnosti;
Welcomes the greater emphasis placed on animal protection under the Common Agricultural Policy; points out, however, that the resulting bureaucratic costs are already significantly too high; regrets, furthermore, the fact that the cut in funding for rural development policy will create practical obstacles to the financing of aid for stockbreeders to adapt to the Community rules on animal welfare; regrets that poultry and pig farmers are not being compensated for complying with Community animal welfare legislation under the cross-compliance schemes;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v okviru politike razvoja podeželja pozitivno ovrednoti uporabo vseh obstoječih instrumentov za zaščito živali;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States, within the framework of rural development policy, to consider favourably the use of all instruments available for animal protection;
opozarja, da v praksi ES pogosto prihaja do neupoštevanja določb o prevozu živali (Uredba (ES) št. 1/2005 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1/2005 z dne 22. decembra 2004 o zaščiti živali med prevozom in postopki, povezanimi z njim (UL L 3, 5.1.2005, str.
Points out that, in practice, the EC rules on the transport of animals (Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations (OJ L 3, 5.1.2005, p.
), zlasti v zvezi z zahtevami glede počitka ter zagotavljanja vode in krme za živali; zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj s sprejetjem ustreznih ukrepov zagotovita, da bodo države članice povečale obseg in učinkovitost nadzora, ki ga izvajajo nad uporabo predpisov ES;
) are frequently disregarded, particularly in regard to the requirements to rest,, water and feed the animals; calls, therefore, upon the Council and the Commission to take appropriate action in order to ensure that the Member States increase the number and the effectiveness of the checks carried out on the application of EC rules;
opozarja, da je za prevoz živali nujno uvesti in upoštevati znanstveno preverjene kazalnike na področju zaščite živali (ustrezna tehnična oprema, časovni okvir, usposobljeno osebje) in da bi bilo treba pri določitvi teh kazalnikov zaradi razlik v prilagajanju živali na okolje upoštevati različne podnebne razmere v državah članicah; zato poziva Komisijo, naj podpre prizadevanja za določitev in uvedbo stvarnih in posebnih parametrov za boljšo opredelitev dobrega počutja živali med prevozom, da se določi tudi celovit sistem certificiranja, pri katerih bo upoštevan tudi vpliv, ki ga lahko imajo različne podnebne in strukturne danosti evropskih regij na živali, vrste in trajanje prevoza;
Points out that, with regard to the transport of animals, it is absolutely essential to introduce and take account of scientifically-based animal protection indicators (relating to suitable technology, time frames, trained staff) and that when those indicators are established, account should be taken of variations in climate between Member States, in view of the varying kevels of adaptation of animals to the environment; calls on the Commission, therefore, to promote research aimed at defining and introducing objective and specific technical parameters enabling a better definition of animal welfare during transport, with a view, additionally, to defining integrated certification systems which will also take account of the influence of the various climatic and structural characteristics of Europe's regions on the animals and on transport modes and times;
opozarja, da bi morala Komisija do leta 2010 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložiti poročilo o gostoti natovarjanja in najdaljšem dovoljenem času pri prevozu živali skupaj z ustreznimi zakonodajnimi predlogi;
Points out that by 2010 the Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on space allowances and maximum journey times for animals being transported, accompanied by appropriate legislative proposals;
meni, da sta podpora načelu nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja in prihodnji usmeritvi pri raziskavah zaščite živali ločeni področji in da bi bilo treba cilj 4 razdeliti na dva cilja, da bi to prišlo do izraza;
Considers that the support for the 3Rs and support for future trends in animal welfare research are two separate issues and that Objective 4 of the Action Plan should be divided into two objectives to reflect this;
pozdravlja napovedana raziskovalna prizadevanja na področju zaščite živali; meni, da bi morale biti raziskave razen na splošno razširjanje temeljnega znanja osredotočene tudi na razvoj preprostih in preglednih kazalnikov na področju zaščite živali, sistemov certificiranja in označevanja ter metod, ki nadomeščajo poskuse na živalih (po načelu nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja);
Welcomes the research efforts announced in the field of animal protection; considers that, in addition to generally widening the knowledge base, research should focus on the development of animal health indicators that are transparent and easy to apply, certification and labelling systems and alternatives to animal testing (3Rs);
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se, kjer je to primerno, znanstveno preverjeni kazalniki, ki so bili že razviti, v kar največji meri vključijo v sedanje in nove pravne predpise za zaščito živali; ali z drugimi besedami, predpisovanje ciljev naj bi imelo prednost pred predpisovanjem sredstev;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that, where appropriate scientific indicators have been developed, they should be included in existing and new animal protection legislation to the greatest extent possible; in other words, preference should be given to goal prescriptions instead of means prescriptions;
poziva Komisijo, naj se pri vseh prihodnjih spremembah pravnih predpisov za dobro počutje živali opre na stvarne kazalnike;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that any future revision of the rules on animal welfare is based on objective indicators, so as to avoid arbitrary decisions having unjustified economic repercussions for stockbreeders;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v Sedmem okvirnem raziskovalnem programu zagotovijo dovolj sredstev za raziskave na področju zaščite in dobrega počutja živali, da bodo cilji akcijskega programa dejansko doseženi; poziva, da se poseben pomen pripisuje raziskovanju stvarnih kazalnikov dobrega počutja živali in da se pri določitvi teh kazalnikov upoštevajo različne podnebne razmere v EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that adequate resources are made available for research into the protection and welfare of all animals under the Seventh Framework Programme in order to achieve the objectives of the Action Programme; urges that particular stress be laid on research aimed at establishing objective indicators for animal welfare, and that account be taken of climate variations across the EU when those indicators are established;
poziva Komisijo, naj podpre raziskave in razvoj elektronskih sistemov za identifikacijo živali;
Calls on the Commission to support research and development concerning electronic systems for animal identification;
poziva Komisijo, naj tudi v Sedmem okvirnem raziskovalnem programu zagotovi možnost nadaljnje nebirokratske uporabe tehnoloških platform in raziskav iz Šestega okvirnega raziskovalnega programa, ki podobno kot "PredTox" znatno prispevajo k izpolnjevanju ciljev akcijskega programa;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that technology platforms and research work undertaken under the Six Research Framework Programme which, as for example in the case of 'PredTox', will make a significant contribution to achieving the objectives of the Action Programme, are able to be continued under the Seventh Research Framework Programme without entailing red tape;
meni, da je treba načelo nadomestitve, zmanjšanja in izboljšanja v celoti upoštevati; pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za nadaljnji razvoj Direktive 86/609/EGS; spodbuja Komisijo, naj v letu 2006 predloži ustrezne zakonodajne predloge; pričakuje, da bo Komisija pri tem pojasnila, kako je mogoče zagotoviti enotno uporabo in nadzor določb;
Considers that it is necessary fully to take account of the 3Rs principle; welcomes the efforts by the Commission to develop Directive 86/609/EEC; encourages the Commission to submit relevant legislative proposals during 2006; desires the Commission to set out, in this connection, how uniform implementation and monitoring of the provisions can be ensured;
meni, da bi morala predlagana sprememba zakonodaje ES s področja poskusov na živalih zagotoviti razširitev področja uporabe Direktive 86/609/EGS na temeljne raziskave in raziskave, pri katerih se živali uporabljajo v pedagoške namene;
Considers that as part of the proposed revision of EU legislation on animal testing the scope of Directive 86/609/EEC should be widened to cover basic research and research using animals for teaching purposes;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi učinkovitost, možnost pregleda in pravočasno predložitev prispevkov industrije k nadomeščanju poskusov na živalih prek Evropskega partnerstva za alternativne pristope (EPAA); poziva Komisijo, naj izpopolni določbe o izmenjavi podatkov o poskusih na vretenčarjih in o izogibanju podvajanju poskusov na živalih ter jih uporabi na vseh področjih poskusov na živalih in v vsej zakonodaji, ki predpisuje te poskuse, vključno z izmenjavo podatkov iz neobjavljenih in negativnih študij;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that industry contributions to replacing animal testing agreed through the European Partnership on Alternative Approaches are effective, open to scrutiny and delivered in time; Calls on the Commission to improve provisions for the sharing of vertebrate animal test data and the avoidance of duplicate animal testing and to apply these to all areas of animal experimentation, and all legislation requiring animal testing, including the sharing of data from unpublished and negative studies;
poziva Komisijo, naj se na mednarodni ravni, zlasti v STO in OIE, zavzame za enotno raven pravnih predpisov za zaščito živali in zahtev v zvezi s poskusi na živalih pri certificiranju proizvodov ter za priznanje v EU odobrenih postopkov pri zaščiti živali; meni, da je treba pospešiti razvoj, odobritev in sprejemljivost metod, pri katerih se ne uporabljajo poskusi na živalih, in na vsaki stopnji zagotoviti več sredstev, osebja in upravne podpore za čim hitrejšo nadomestitev poskusov na živalih;
Calls on the Commission to plead at an international level, notably at the WTO and the OIE, for a single legislative standard for requirements relating to animal protection and animal testing in connection with product authorisation and for the recognition of alternative protection methods validated in Europe; considers that the development, validation and acceptance of non-animal methods must be accelerated and that increased funding, personnel and administrative support must be provided at every stage to ensure the fastest possible replacement of animal experimentation;
poziva regulativne organe EU, naj nemudoma odobrijo poskuse, ki ne potekajo na živalih in jih je Evropski center za validacijo alternativnih metod že odobril;
Calls upon EU regulatory bodies to accept without delay the non-animal tests already validated by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods;
priznava, da je nekakovostno znanstveno delo neetično in se z njim zapravljajo sredstva ter da bi morala EU zahtevati, da se vsi novi, spremenjeni in uveljavljeni testi glede varnosti za ljudi in okolje v celoti odobrijo v skladu s sodobnimi standardi, še preden bodo ti testi zahtevani, priporočeni ali potrjeni z zakonodajo ali s strategijami Skupnosti;
Recognises that poor quality science is both unethical and a waste of resources and that the EU should require that all new, revised and existing human and environmental safety tests be fully validated in accordance with modern standards before such tests are required, recommended or endorsed under Community legislation or strategies;
poziva Komisijo, naj pred ustanovitvijo dodatnega organa Skupnosti za zaščito živali izboljša povezovanje obstoječih institucij Skupnosti, ki se ukvarjajo z vprašanji zaščite živali;
Calls on the Commission, before setting up an additional Community body for animal protection, to improve links between existing Community institutions which deal with animal protection issues;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za razvoj in raziskave uporabe sistema označevanja za zaščito živali; meni, da bi tako označevanje potrošniku omogočalo, da se premišljeno odloči za nakup; meni, da bi si bilo treba prizadevati za vključitev predelanih proizvodov v takšen sistem označevanja;
Welcomes the efforts by the Commission to develop and explore the use of animal protection labelling; considers that such labelling would enable consumers to make informed purchasing decisions; considers that it should be aimed to include processed products in such a labelling system;
meni, da bi bilo treba potrošnike obvestiti o tem, da bodo za izdelke kmetijskih gospodarstev z višjimi standardi zaščite živali plačevali višjo ceno, ter jih na to pripraviti, in da bi bilo treba te izdelke ustrezno označevati;
Considers that consumers should be informed and prepared to pay higher prices for products originating from farms with higher animal welfare standards and that these products should be appropriately labelled;
meni, da bi moralo biti poročilo Komisije o možnosti obveznega sistema označevanja kokošjega mesa in proizvodov na podlagi skladnosti s standardi dobrega počutja živali, predloženo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do leta 2008, kakor je predvideno v akcijskem načrtu, osredotočeno zlasti na skladnost s standardi dobrega počutja živali, ki presegajo minimalne zahteve; meni, da bi s programom označevanja, temelječem na standardih, ki presegajo najnižje pravne zahteve, rešili razširjeno težavo potrošnikov, ki želijo kupiti izdelek, pri katerem je bilo dobro počutje živali še posebej upoštevana, vendar takšnih izdelkov v trgovini ne morejo prepoznati;
Considers that the submission of a Commission report to the European Parliament and the Council by 2008 concerning the possibility of a compulsory labelling system for chicken meat and meat products based on compliance with animal welfare standards should concentrate particularly on compliance with animal welfare standards that transcend the minimum requirements; takes the view that a labelling programme based on standards higher than the legal minimum would solve the recognised problem faced by consumers who would like to buy a product which has been produced with particular concern for animal welfare but are unable to identify such products in the shops;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo označevanje pregledno, lahko razumljivo in zanesljivo; meni, da bi že "oznaka EU", ki bi navajala, recimo, "proizvedeno v skladu s standardi EU za zaščito živali" in - za izdelke, ki standardov ne bi izpolnjevali - "ni proizvedeno v skladu s standardi EU za zaščito živali", zagotavljala izpolnjevanje preprostega in zavezujočega standarda za zaščito živali pri vseh izdelkih, ki se prodajajo v Evropi; meni, da je mogoče v primeru ukrepov za zaščito živali, ki presegajo minimalne predpisane standarde, potrošnika s posebno navedbo na etiketi obvestiti o dodatnih prizadevanjih proizvajalca, povečati pritisk na trgovinske partnerje, da prevzamejo ES standarde za zaščito živali in Evropi tako omogočiti, da svoje standarde za zaščito živali izvozi po vsem svetu; poudarja vlogo zasebnega označevanja, zlasti v primeru višjih standardov za zaščito živali;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that labelling is transparent, easily comprehensible and reliable; considers that an 'EU label', stating, for example, 'produced in accordance with EU animal protection standards', and - for non-complying products - 'not produced in accordance with EU animal protection standards', would already imply a guarantee of compliance with the animal protection standard of a simple and mandatory nature for all products sold in Europe; considers that in the case of protection going beyond that required by the minimum standards, a specific reference on the label would inform the consumer about the additional efforts made by the producer, increase pressure on trading partners to adopt EC animal protection standards and, by doing so, enable Europe to export its animal welfare standards globally; emphasises the role of private labels particularly as regards higher animal welfare standards;
zahteva, da se finančna podpora, ki jo Komisija dodeljuje za nacionalne ukrepe pospeševanja na področju obveščanja o živilih živalskega izvora in njihove prodaje, v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1071/2005 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1071/2005 z dne 1. julija 2005 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2826/2000 o akcijah informiranja in promocije za kmetijske proizvode na notranjem trgu (UL L 179, 11.7.2005, str.
Calls for financial support by the Commission for national information and sales promotion measures for animal food products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2005 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1071/2005 of 1 July 2005 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market (OJ L 179, 11.7.2005, p.
dodeljuje na podlagi proizvodnih standardov, ki upoštevajo zaščito živali; zato meni, da bi bilo treba "standard evropske kakovosti" za proizvode, ki izvirajo iz proizvodnih sistemov, ki so bili predlagani v akcijskem načrtu, obravnavati prednostno;
to be awarded on the basis of production standards relating to animal welfare; takes the view, therefore, that a European Quality Standard for products emanating from high animal welfare production systems, as suggested in the Action Plan, should therefore be established as a matter of priority;
pozdravlja predlog, da se potrošnikom olajša prepoznavanje predlaganih sistemov trženja in obveščanja, vendar hkrati poudarja, da je treba olajšati njihovo uporabo vsem udeleženim stranem v prehranski verigi;
Welcomes the proposal to facilitate the recognition by consumers of the proposed marketing and information systems, but at the same time stresses the necessity to facilitating their application for the benefit of all players in the food-production chain;
načeloma podpira napovedani razvoj in raziskave uporabe celovitih in enotnih kazalnikov na področju zaščite živali; meni, da morajo imeti takšni kazalniki trdno znanstveno osnovo, biti stvarni, merljivi in ponovljivi ter prispevati k preglednosti standardov za zaščito živali; meni, da je treba vanje vključiti tudi vidike zdravja živali; meni, da bi morali celoviti in enotni kazalniki olajšati nadzor, poenostaviti birokratske postopke in privesti do znanstvenih spoznanj, primerljivih med državami članicami;
Fundamentally supports the announced intention to develop and explore the use of integrated and uniform animal protection indicators; considers that such indicators must have a sound scientific basis, must be objective, measurable and replicable, and must help ensure that animal protection standards are transparent; considers it necessary to integrate animal health aspects into such indicators; considers that integrated and uniform indicators should facilitate monitoring, reduce red tape and yield scientific results that are comparable between Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi, da bodo celoviti kazalniki na področju zaščite živali izdelani v treh letih po sprejetju akcijskega načrta, ustrezne raziskave pa v tem času zaključene;
Calls on the Commission to complete the development of, and research into, integrated animal protection indicators within three years;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži in dosledno izvaja svojo napovedano komunikacijsko strategijo; meni, da je lahko Akcijski načrt uspešen samo ob ustrezni obveščenosti vseh zainteresiranih strani o prednostih, ki jih ima visoka raven sedanje in prihodnje zaščite živali v Evropi za živali in proizvode;
Calls on the Commission to present its announced communication strategy as soon as possible and to implement it rigorously; believes that the Action Plan can only be successful if all stakeholders are adequately informed of the benefits which a high level of animal protection in Europe entails for animals and products;