natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pisna vprašanja : E-000009/11 , P-000225/11 , P-000458/11 , P-000256/11 , E-000021/11 , E-000861/11 , E-000236/11 , P-000191/11 , E-000373/11
Written questions : E-000009/11 , P-000225/11 , P-000458/11 , P-000256/11 , E-000021/11 , E-000861/11 , E-000236/11 , P-000191/11 , E-000373/11
Komisija obžaluje, da so bili v Evropskem rokovniku za šolsko leto 2010–2011 izpuščeni krščanski verski prazniki.
The Commission regrets the omission of Christian religious holidays from the Europa Diary 2010/2011.
Komisija bo popravek poslala vsem šolam v Evropski uniji, ki so prejele Evropski rokovnik za leto 2010‑2011.
The Commission will send a Corrigendum to all schools in the European Union which received the 2010/2011 Europa Diary.
Popravek bo zajemal glavne državne praznike zadevne države članice, med katerimi bodo tudi verski prazniki.
The Corrigendum will include the main public holidays, including religious holidays, in the Member State concerned.
Popravek bo neposredno dosegljiv tudi na spletni strani Evropskega rokovnika.
The Corrigendum will also be made directly available on the Europa Diary website.
Evropski rokovnik je šolski rokovnik za srednješolce.
The Europa Diary is a school diary for secondary school pupils.
Vsebuje vrsto zanimivih in koristnih informacij za to starostno skupino, kot so potovanja, prehrana, nakupovanje, rokovanje z denarjem, okolje, podnebne spremembe, trajnostna potrošnja, razvoj in varnost.
It contains information on a range of topics which can be of interest or help to this age group such as travel, nutrition, shopping, money matters, environment, climate change, sustainable consumption, development, and safety issues.
Rokovnik se pošilja na prošnjo učiteljev pred začetkom šolskega leta, priložen pa mu je vodnik za učitelje.
It is distributed at the request of teachers before the beginning of the school-year and it is accompanied by a teacher's guide.
Za prilagoditev Evropskega rokovnika različnim nacionalnim okoljem se pogodbeni izvajalec, ki izdaja publikacijo, posvetuje z nacionalnimi partnerji v posamezni državi članici.
The contractor producing the Diary consults national partners in each Member State in order to adapt the Europa Diary to the different national contexts.
Rokovnik zajema šolsko leto in ne koledarskega leta.
The Diary covers the school year, not the calendar year.
Poleg uvodnega dela vsebuje koledarske strani, v katerih niti verski niti državni prazniki niso sistematično našteti.
In addition to an editorial part, it includes an agenda, which does not systematically list holidays, either religious or national ones.
Na dnu vsake strani tedenskega koledarja so kratke informacije o vrsti tem, ki jih evropski dijaki morda ne poznajo tako dobro.
These weekly pages include a footnote with a fact of which young people in Europe are not necessarily aware.
Nekatere izmed teh kratkih informacij navajajo različne verske praznike.
Some of these footnotes mention holidays of different religions.
Na teh straneh so žal bili izpuščeni krščanski prazniki.
This is where the regrettable omission of Christian holidays occurred.
Prihodnja izdaja (za leto 2011–2012), ki se že pripravlja, bo zajemala seznam glavnih državnih in tudi verskih praznikov v posamezni državi članici.
The future edition (2011/2012), which is under way, will include a list of the main public holidays, including religious holidays, celebrated in each of the Member States.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-000207/2011
Question for written answer E-000207/2011
Zadeva: Preprečevanje motenj italijanskih radijskih postaj
Subject: Avoiding interference with Italian radio stations
Ali so določbe pravilnika o radijski komunikaciji Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze (ITU) sestavni del evropskega prava ali ne, glede na določbe Direktive 2009/140/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009, predvsem ob upoštevanju njenega člena 9?
Is it or is it not the case that the ITU (International Telecommunication Union) Radio Regulations form an integral part of European law for the purposes of Directive 2009/140/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009, especially given the text of Article 9 as set out therein?
Odgovor E-207/11EN v imenu Komisije odgovarja komisarka Kroes
Answer given by Ms Kroes on behalf of the Commission
(8. marec 2011)
(8 March 2011)
Komisija se zaveda ključne vloge Pravilnika o radiokomunikacijah Mednarodne telekomunikacijske zveze (ITU) na področju radiodifuzije, še zlasti dejstva, da je delo mednarodnih in regionalnih organizacij, ki se ukvarjajo z upravljanjem radijskega spektra in kakršna je tudi ITU, pomembno za zagotavljanje učinkovitega upravljanja in uskladitev uporabe spektra na območju celotne EU ter med njenimi državami članicami in drugimi članicami ITU.
The Commission understands the essential role played by ITU Radio Regulations in the field of radio broadcasting, in particular, the fact that the work of international and regional organisations dealing with radio spectrum management, such as the ITU, is important to ensure the efficient management of and harmonisation of the use of spectrum across the EU and between the Member States and the other members of the ITU.
Komisija jasno prepoznava pomen mednarodnih in regionalnih sporazumov, zlasti Pravilnika o radiokomunikacijah ITU, saj so njihovi cilji ter področja uporabe namenjeni izogibanju škodljivih motenj med njihovimi državami članicami, vključno z državami članicami in nečlanicami EU, ter doseganju določene mere usklajenosti pri uporabi spektra na regionalni in svetovni ravni.
The Commission clearly recognises the importance of international and regional agreements, in particular ITU Radio Regulations, as their aim and scope is to avoid harmful interference between its member countries, including between Member States and non‑EU countries, and to achieve some coordination of the use of spectrum at regional and global levels.
Sklicevanje na mednarodne sporazume iz člena 9(1) Direktive 2002/21/ES http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:108:0033:0050:EN:PDF. (okvirna direktiva) s spremembami mora upoštevati dve pomembni načeli.
The reference to international agreements in Article 9(1) of Directive 2002/21/EC http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2002:108:0033:0050:EN:PDF (‘Framework Directive’) as amended has to take into account two important principles.
Prvič, države članice morajo spoštovati svoje mednarodne zaveze v ITU, v kolikor so te v skladu s pravom EU, kot so se k temu tudi izrecno zavezale ob koncu vsake konference.
First, Member States have to abide by their international commitments in the ITU insofar as they are compatible with EC law, as they also have specifically committed to at the end of each Conference.
Drugič, Pravilnik o radiokomunikacijah ITU ter drugi pogodbe in sporazumi ITU niso sestavni del zakonodaje EU, zato institucije EU niso odgovorne za njihovo izvajanje s strani držav članic.
Secondly, the ITU Radio Regulations and other ITU Treaties and Agreements are not an integral part of EU legislation and the EU institutions are therefore not responsible for their implementation by Member States.
V vsakem primeru pa je za razlago prava Evropske Unije pristojno Sodišče Evropske unije.
In any case, the interpretation of Union law is the competence of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-000994/2011
Question for written answer E-000994/2011
Zadeva: Objava uradnega dnevnika EU za mlade: kršitev načela svobode misli, izražanja mnenja in vere
Subject: Publication of the official EU diary for young people: violation of the principle of freedom of thought, opinion and religion
Komisija je nedavno pripravila več kot tri milijone izvodov Evropskega dnevnika, ki vsebuje 51 strani informacij o Evropski uniji.
The Commission recently produced over 3 million copies of the European Diary, with 51 pages of information on the European Union.
Dnevnike je Komisija že brezplačno razdelila dijakom na 21 000 šolah.
That diary has already been distributed to over 21 000 schools, free of charge to students, by the Commission.
Zanje je porabila približno 5 milijonov EUR.
Around EUR 5 million were spent on the diaries.
V dnevniku so datumi glavnih verskih praznikov, vključno z muslimanskimi, hindujskimi, sikhovskimi, judovskimi in kitajskimi, ter drugih sekularnih državnih praznikov, kot so Dan Evrope in drugi pomembni evropski prazniki, vendar med njimi ni krščanskih praznikov, niti božiča, čeprav je večina Evropejcev kristjanov.
The dates of the main religious festivals are shown in the diary, including Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Jewish and Chinese holy days and other, secular, public holidays, such as Europe Day and other important European holidays, but no Christian feast days — not even Christmas Day — are mentioned, despite the fact that the most Europeans are Christians.
Evropska unija mora prav zaradi nenehnega preganjanja, getoizacije in napadanja kristjanov po svetu večji poudarek nameniti spoštovanju verske svobode svojih državljanov in priznavanju njihovih praznikov, saj je to temeljno načelo vsakega demokratičnega sistema.
Precisely because there have been continual acts of persecution, ghettoisation and attacks on Christians throughout the world, the responsibility lies with the European Union to focus greater attention on respect for the freedom of religion of its citizens and recognition of their feast days, with this being the basic principle of any democratic system.
Poleg tega je tiskovna služba Komisije 12. januarja 2011 napovedala, da ne namerava umakniti izvodov dnevnika, ki so že v obtoku.
Furthermore, on 12 January 2011, the Commission press service announced that it had no intention to recall the copies of the diary that had already been distributed.
Ali lahko Komisija navede: 1.
Can the Commission therefore state: 1.
Zakaj ne namerava umakniti izvodov dnevnika, ki so že v obtoku? 2.
Why it does not intend to recall the copies of the diary already distributed? 2.
Ali vsebina tega dnevnika po njenem mnenju ni v nasprotju s členom 10 (svoboda vere) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, in njenima členoma 21 in 22, ki prepovedujeta diskriminacijo na podlagi vere in določata, da unija spoštuje versko in kulturno raznolikost? 3.
Whether it does not consider the contents of that diary to conflict with Article 10 (freedom of religion) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and Articles 21 and 22 of that Charter, which concern the principle of non‑discrimination on the grounds of religion and respect by the Union for the religious and cultural diversity of European citizens? 3.
Katera objektivna merila so bila upoštevana pri pripravi dnevnika? 4.
What objective criteria were taken into consideration when drawing up the diary? 4.
Ali bo v prihodnje preverila vsebino tovrstnih dnevnikov in prevzela odgovornost ter zagotovila, da bodo ti dnevniki odražali vrednote in temeljne pravice Evropske unije?
Whether it will check the contents of such diaries in future, and assume responsibility for ensuring that these reflect the values and fundamental rights of the European Union?
Odgovor Johna Dallija v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Dalli on behalf of the Commission
(28. marec 2011)
(28 March 2011)
Komisija želi poslance opozoriti na odgovore na pisna vprašanja E‑9/11 , E-21/11 , P-191/11 , P-225/11 , E‑236/11 , P-256/11 , E-373/11 , P-458/11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB. o isti temi ter na izjavo Komisije o takojšnjem ukrepu za odpravo nevključitve krščanskih praznikov v Evropskem rokovniku za šolsko leto 2010–2011, ki je bil objavljen na spletni strani:
The Commission would refer the Honourable Members to its answer to Written Questions E‑9/11 , E‑21/11 , P‑191/11 , P‑225/11 , E‑236/11 , P‑256/11 , E‑373/11 , P‑458/11 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB on the same subject and to the Commission statement on the immediate remedial action taken to correct the omission of Christian holidays in the Europa Diary 2010/2011 which has been published on:
Komisija je preučila morebitni umik rokovnika.
The Commission considered withdrawal of the diary.
Sklenila je, da ta možnost ni izvedljiva, ker dijaki rokovnik uporabljajo že od začetka šolskega leta, in sicer vsaj od septembra 2010.
It concluded this was not a feasible option because students had been using the diary since the start of the school year, at least since September 2010.
Nevključitev krščanskih praznikov ni bil namerna odločitev ali ukrep v nasprotju s členi 10, 21 in 22 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah.
The omission of Christian holidays was not a deliberate choice or action in contradiction with Articles 10, 21 and 22 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
Uvodne strani rokovnika zajemajo poglavje o strpnosti, diskriminaciji in temeljnih pravicah ter besedilo člena 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah.
The editorial pages of the diary include a chapter about tolerance, discrimination and fundamental rights, including the text of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Merila za besedilo opomb na dnu vsake strani tedenskega koledarja v izdaji za šolsko leto 2010–2011, v katero niso bili vključeni krščanski prazniki, niso bila podrobno določena.
No detailed criteria were set for the text of the footnotes at the bottom of the weekly calendar pages for the 2010/2011 edition where the omission occurred.
Te opombe naj bi na splošno vsebovale podatke ali citate, ki jih morda ne poznajo vsi najstniki.
These footnotes were in general intended to contain facts or quotations which not all teenagers might know.
Komisija pregleduje svoje notranje postopke, s čimer bo zagotovila strožji nadzor nad kakovostjo publikacije.
The Commission is reviewing its internal procedures to guarantee stricter control over the quality of the product.
Odgovor komisarja Dallija v imenu Komisije
Joint answer given by Mr Dalli on behalf of the Commission
Pisna vprašanja : E-001151/11 , E-001196/11 , E-001436/11
Written questions : E-001151/11 , E-001196/11 , E-001436/11
(23. marec 2011)
(23 March 2011)
Komisija se zaveda naraščajočega števila nacionalnih registracij, ki so bile izdane za obdobje 120 dni v skladu z določbami člena 8(4) Direktive 91/414/EGS.
The Commission is aware of the increasing number of national authorisations granted for 120 days under the provisions of Article 8(4) of Directive 91/414/EEC.
Komisija po nedavno objavljenem poročilu organizacije PAN-Europe z dne 26. januarja 2011 natančneje preučuje uradna obvestila, prejeta v zadnjih petih letih.
Following the recent report published by PAN-Europe on 26 January 2011, the Commission is analyzing more in detail the notifications received over the last five years.
Predhodna analiza kaže, da večina registracij zadeva snovi, ki jih je Komisija že odobrila ali katerih odobritev je bila še v postopku v času njihove registracije.
From a preliminary analysis it appears that the majority of the authorisations concern substances already approved by the Commission or for which approval was still pending at the moment of authorisation.
Številne registracije so bile izdane za uporabe pri manj razširjenih kulturah, pri katerih ima industrija manjši gospodarski interes zaprositi za registracijo.
Numerous authorisations have been granted for uses in minor crops, for which industry has a limited economic incentive to apply for an authorisation.
Treba je upoštevati, da je v novi Uredbi (ES) št. 1107/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet UL L 309, 24.11.2009 . več določb, katerih cilj je izboljšati razpoložljivost fitofarmacevtskih sredstev za manj razširjene kulture.
It should be born in mind that the new Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market OJ L 309, 24.11.2009. , lays down a number of provisions that are meant to improve the availability of plant protection products for minor crops.
Poleg tega registracije iz člena 8(4) zadevajo tudi nadzor izbruhov reguliranih škodljivih organizmov, proti katerim države članice sprejmejo nujne ukrepe.
In addition, Article 8(4) authorisations also concern the control of outbreak of regulated harmful organisms, against which urgent measures shall be taken by the Member States.
Komisija želi poudariti, da so za izdajo registracij iz člena 8(4) pristojne države članice ter je Komisija o njih obveščena, ko je registracija že izdana.
The Commission would like to highlight that Article 8(4) authorisations are granted by the Member States under their responsibility and that the Commission is informed once the authorisation has been issued.
Tehnično in agronomsko oceno opravijo države članice pred izdajo registracij iz člena 8(4) brez vključitve Komisije.
The technical evaluation and agronomic assessment, before granting Article 8(4) authorisations, are carried out by the Member States without the involvement of the Commission.
Poleg tega so države članice, ki izdajajo navedene registracije, odgovorne za določitev primernih pogojev uporabe in ukrepov za zmanjševanje tveganja, da se prepreči škoda za zdravje in okolje ter zagotovi upoštevanje mejnih vrednosti ostankov iz Uredbe (ES) št. 396/2005 UL L 70, 16.3.2005 . .
Furthermore, it is the responsibility of the Member States granting those authorisations to impose suitable conditions of use and risk mitigation measures to prevent damage to health and the environment and to ensure that maximum residue levels (MRLs) set under Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 OJ L 70, 16.3.2005. are complied with.
Vendar Komisija priznava, da je nujno treba oblikovati bolj usklajene smernice v zvezi z ocenjevanjem in odločanjem o teh registracijah.
However, the Commission recognises that there is an urgent need to establish more harmonised guidelines concerning the evaluation and decision-making process underlying these authorisations.
Poleg tega je treba izboljšati obstoječi sistem obveščanja, tako da se od držav članic zahteva, da Komisiji predložijo dodatne informacije v zvezi z natančnimi razlogi za izdajo registracij in uporabo ukrepov za zmanjševanje tveganja.
Furthermore, it is necessary to improve the existing notification system, by requiring the Member States to submit additional information to the Commission as regards the detailed reasons for granting the authorisation and the mitigation measures applied.
Komisija meni, da je treba navedene smernice oblikovati v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009, ki bo 14. junija 2011 razveljavila Direktivo 91/414/EGS.
The Commission considers that those guidelines should be developed in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009, which will repeal Directive 91/414/EEC on 14 June 2011.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-001436/2011
Question for written answer E-001436/2011
Frédérique Ries (ALDE) , Alojz Peterle (PPE) , Dan Jørgensen (S&D) , Corinne Lepage (ALDE) in Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE)
Frédérique Ries (ALDE) , Alojz Peterle (PPE) , Dan Jørgensen (S&D) , Corinne Lepage (ALDE) and Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE)
Zadeva: Izjemen porast odstopanj za nedovoljeno uporabo pesticidov leta 2010
Subject: Huge increase in derogations for unauthorised use of pesticides in 2010
Januarja 2009 so evropske institucije sprejele ambiciozen sveženj o pesticidih, ki vključuje novo uredbo, s katero naj bi zaostrili pravila o uporabi in odobritvi pesticidov v Evropi, ter okvirno direktivo o trajnostni rabi pesticidov.
In January 2009, the European institutions adopted an ambitious package on pesticides, including a new regulation to tighten rules on pesticide use and authorisation in Europe, and a framework directive on sustainable use of pesticides.
Vsi menimo, da je bil ta novi zakonodajni okvir korak v pravo smer, da bi zaščitili evropske potrošnike in okolje, prepovedali strupene pesticide in spodbudili inovacije za trajnostno kmetijstvo.
We all consider that this new legislative framework was a step in the right direction to protect European consumers and the environment, to ban toxic pesticides and to foster innovation towards sustainable agriculture.
Vsi pa tudi vemo, da izboljšanja javnega zdravja ne bomo dosegli brez učinkovitega izvajanja zakonov in če bodo namesto tega odstopanja in neuradni dogovori o odobritvi pesticidov v EU postali pravilo.
On the other hand, we all know that this improvement in public health will not be achieved without effective implementation of the law and if, instead, derogations and unofficial arrangements in EU pesticide authorisations become the rule.
Zaradi tega smo zelo resno obravnavali podatke, ki jih je v svojem poročilu 26. januarja 2011 objavila organizacija PAN-Europe (mreža več kot 600 nevladnih organizacij) in kažejo izjemen porast odstopanj za neodobrene pesticide, in sicer za več kot 500 % v zadnjem štiriletnem obdobju.
This is why we take a serious view of the information in a report published on 26 January 2011 by PAN-Europe (a network of over 600 non-governmental organisations) that shows an explosion of derogations for unauthorised pesticides of over 500 % in a four-year period.
Povedano natančneje, leta 2010 so države članice zaprosile za 321 odstopanj na podlagi člena 8(4) Direktive 91/414/ES o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet.
More precisely, in 2010, Member States applied for 321 derogations on the basis of Article 8.4 of Directive 91/414/EC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market.
Taka odstopanja omogoča tudi člen 53 Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2009 o dajanju fitofarmacevtskih sredstev v promet.
Article 53 of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 on the placing on the market of plant protection products also provides for such derogations.
Ali lahko Evropska komisija potrdi, da je oziroma ni bilo vseh 321 odstopanj odobrenih na osnovi pogoja „ nepredvidljiva nevarnost za zdravje ljudi in okolje “?
Could the European Commission confirm whether or not the 321 derogations were all granted on the basis of the condition of ‘ unforeseen danger for human health and the environment ’?
Ali Komisija nadalje soglaša, da je taka praksa resnično izkrivljanje duha zakona?
Furthermore, does the Commission agree that this practice constitutes a real distortion of the spirit of the law?
Ali je Komisija pripravila svojo lastno oceno pogoja neobstoja alternativ, da se dovoli odobritev takega odstopanja?
Did the Commission make its own assessment of the condition of the absence of alternatives for being allowed to grant such a derogation?
Kako se ocenjujejo alternative in ali so vključene nekemične alternative?
How are the alternatives evaluated, and are non-chemical alternatives included?
Ali je Komisija preverila, ali so države članice, ki podeljujejo ta odstopanja, določile ustrezne živilske standarde in ali so bili sprejeti ustrezni ukrepi za ublažitev, da bi preprečili škodo za zdravje in okolje?
Did the Commission check whether proper food standards were laid down by Member States granting these derogations and whether proper mitigation measures were taken to prevent damage to health and the environment?
Kako bi bilo po mnenju Evropske komisije mogoče razširiti pravico državljanov in združenj, ki utegnejo biti izpostavljeni pesticidom, dovoljenim s temi odstopanji, da podajo pripombe na vlogo oziroma nasprotujejo sklepu?
How does the European Commission consider that improvements could be made to the right of citizens and associations potentially exposed to the pesticides allowed by these derogations to comment on an application or object to a decision?
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-001661/2011
Question for written answer E-001661/2011
Zadeva: Predlog direktive Sveta o ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki
Subject: Proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste