natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje, da Komisija predlagane uredbe sploh ni poslala Parlamentu v vednost, čeprav se Komisija in Svet dobro zavedata, kako pomembno je za Parlament označevanje izvora; razume, da za ta predlog s pravnega stališča posvetovanje s Parlamentom ni obvezno; vendar vztraja, da bi moral Evropski parlament vedno imeti možnost, da pravočasno izrazi svoje mnenje o vseh pomembnih pobudah drugih institucij Skupnosti;
Deplores the fact that, despite the Commission and the Council's being fully aware of the importance that Parliament attaches to origin marking, the Commission did not even send the proposed regulation to Parliament for information; understands that this proposal does not legally require consultation of Parliament; insists, however, that the European Parliament should always be given the opportunity to express its views on any relevant initiative undertaken by other Community institutions in a timely manner;
vztraja, da mora Komisija izpolnjevati svojo obveznost v skladu z medinstitucionalnim z dne 26. maja 2005 in zagotoviti sodelovanje Parlamenta ter v največji možni meri upoštevati njegovo mnenje;
Insists on the Commission's obligation to ensure the involvement of Parliament, in accordance with the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005, in such a way as to take Parliament's views into account as far as possible;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da nemudoma obvestita Parlament o izidu vseh nadaljnjih presoj vplivov in pravnih analiz, še posebej v zvezi z domnevnimi neskladnostmi predlagane uredbe z obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti in pravili STO;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to inform Parliament without delay about the results of any further impact assessment and legal analysis carried out, in particular with respect to the alleged inconsistencies of the proposed regulation with existing Community legislation and WTO rules;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj posebej poudarita spodbujanje dobrega mnenja o evropski industriji v Skupnosti in zunaj nje, da ohranita njeno identiteto in specifičnost ter zagotovita, da vsesplošnega dobrega slovesa industrije Skupnosti ter podobe in privlačnosti evropskih izdelkov visoke kakovosti ne bo omadeževala nenatančna in zavajajoča označba porekla;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to place special emphasis on promoting the image of European industry inside and outside the Community, safeguarding its identity and specificity, and ensuring that the overall good reputation of the Community's industry and the image and attractiveness of high value European products is not tarnished by inaccurate or misleading indications of origin;
poudarja, da so zaradi varstva potrošnikov potrebna pregledna in dosledna pravila trgovanja, vključno z označbami porekla;
Stresses that consumer protection requires transparent and consistent trade rules including, inter alia, indications of origin;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj sprejmeta vse potrebne ukrepe, da zagotovita enake konkurenčne pogoje za trgovinske partnerice, ki izvajajo zahtevo po označevanju porekla;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to take all necessary steps to ensure a level playing field with trading partners which have implemented origin marking requirements;
poziva države članice, naj ohranijo dosleden pristop Skupnosti do tega vprašanja, s čimer se evropskim potrošnikom zagotovijo popolnejše in natančnejše informacije;
Urges Member States to maintain a consistent Community approach to this issue to enable European consumers to receive more complete and accurate information;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami odločno posreduje za zaščito legitimnih pravic in pričakovanj potrošnikov, kadar obstajajo dokazi, da so tuji proizvajalci in uvozniki ponaredili in/ali uporabili lažne ali zavajajoče označbe porekla;
Encourages the Commission to strongly intervene, together with the Member States, to defend consumers' legitimate rights and expectations whenever there is evidence of counterfeiting and/or use of fraudulent or misleading origin markings by foreign producers and importers;
– Martine Roure v imenu skupine PSE
– Martine Roure, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Alexander Alvaro, Sophia in 't Veld in Margarita Starkevičiūtė v imenu skupine ALDE
– Alexander Alvaro, Sophia in ‘t Veld and Margarita Starkevičiūtė, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Monica Frassoni in Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
– Monica Frassoni and Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
– Francis Wurtz, Sahra Wagenknecht, Giusto Catania, Umberto Guidoni in Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
– Francis Wurtz, Sahra Wagenknecht, Giusto Catania, Umberto Guidoni and Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
o prestreganju podatkov iz bančnih nakazil sistema SWIFT s strani ameriških tajnih služb
on the interception of bank transfer data from the SWIFT system by the US secret services
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, zlasti člena 8 Konvencije,
having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights, in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih človekovih pravicah, zlasti členov 7 in 8 Listine,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, in particular Articles 7 and 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Sveta Evrope št. 108 o varstvu posameznikov pri avtomatski obdelavi osebnih podatkov,
having regard to Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data,
ob upoštevanju člena 6 Pogodbe EU in člena 286 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 6 TEU and Article 286 EC,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 95/46/ES z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL 281, 23.11.1995, str.
having regard to Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL 8, 12.1.2001, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data, OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe (KOM(2005) 343) o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose sredstev,
having regard to the proposal for a regulation (COM(2005) 343)on the transfer of funds,
ob upoštevanju pritožb, ki jih je Privacy International vložil pri nadzornih organih za varstvo osebnih podatkov v 33 državah, ker trdi, da se pri bančnih nakazilih sistema SWIFT niso spoštovali zakonski postopki, predvideni z zakonom o varstvu podatkov, in da so se podatki razkrili brez pravne podlage ali pooblastila,
having regard to the complaints filed by Privacy International to data protection and privacy regulators in 33 countries alleging that the SWIFT transfers were undertaken without regard to legal process under data protection law, and that the disclosures were made without any legal basis or authority,
ker so evropski in ameriški mediji nedavno razkrili obstoj programa za sledenje financiranja terorističnih dejavnosti, ki ga je vzpostavila ameriška administracija in ki je ameriškim oblastem omogočil dostop do vseh finančnih podatkov, ki jih hrani družba SWIFT (Družba za svetovne medbančne finančne telekomunikacije), zadruga v bančnem sektorju s sedežem v Belgiji, ki združuje več kot 8 000 komercialnih bank in institucij v 200 državah, vključno s številnimi centralnimi bankami,
whereas European and US media have recently revealed the existence of the Terrorist Finance Tracking Program, put in place by the US administration, which has allowed US authorities to access all the financial data stored by SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications), a Belgian-based industry-owned cooperative which consists of more than 8 000 commercial banks and institutions in 200 countries, including a number of central banks,
ker informacije, ki jih hrani SWIFT, do katerih so imele dostop ameriške oblasti, zadevajo stotine tisočev državljanov EU, saj Evropska banka uporablja sistem sporočanja SWIFT za prenos sredstev med bankami po celem svetu, in ker SWIFT vsak dan izvede na milijone prenosov in bančnih transakcij,
whereas the information stored by SWIFT to which the US authorities have had access concerns hundred of thousands of EU citizens, as European banks use the SWIFT messaging system for the worldwide transfer of funds between banks, and whereas SWIFT generates millions of transfers and banking transactions on a daily basis,
ker mora biti za vse prenose podatkov, nastale na ozemlju EU in namenjene uporabi izven ozemlja EU, opravljena najmanj presoja primernosti v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES o varstvu podatkov,
whereas any transfer of data generated within EU territory that is to be used outside EU territory should as a minimum be subject to an adequacy assessment pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC on data protection,
ker dostop do podatkov, s katerimi upravlja SWIFT, omogoča, da se odkrijejo ne samo prenosi sredstev v zvezi z nezakonitimi dejavnostmi, temveč tudi informacije o gospodarskih dejavnostih zadevnih posameznikov in držav, kar lahko povzroči razmah gospodarskega in industrijskega vohunjenja,
whereas access to data managed by SWIFT makes it possible to detect not only transfers linked to illegal activities, but also information on the economic activities of the individuals and countries concerned, and this could give rise to large-scale forms of economic and industrial espionage,
opozarja na svojo odločenost, da se bo boril proti terorizmu, in verjame, da je treba najti pravo ravnotežje med varnostnimi ukrepi in varstvom državljanskih svoboščin in temeljnih pravic; izraža svojo globoko zaskrbljenost ob dejstvu, da se je ustvarilo ozračje, ko se vedno manj spoštuje varstvo zasebnosti in podatkov;
Recalls its determination to fight terrorism and believes in the need to strike the right balance between security measures and the protection of civil liberties and fundamental rights; expresses its serious concern at the fact that a climate of deteriorating respect for privacy and data protection is being created;
poudarja, da Evropska unija temelji na pravni državi in morajo biti vsi prenosi osebnih podatkov v tretje države podvrženi zakonodaji o varstvu podatkov na nacionalni in evropski ravni, ki določa, da mora vse prenose odobriti sodni organ in da mora biti vsako odstopanje od tega načela sorazmerno in temeljiti na zakonu ali mednarodnemu sporazumu;
Stresses that the European Union is based on the rule of law and that all transfers of personal data to third countries are subject to data protection legislation at national and European level, which provides that any transfer must be authorised by a judicial authority and that any derogation from this principle must be proportional and founded on a law or an international agreement;
meni, da lahko države članice samo z izvajanjem člena 8 Konvencije o človekovih pravicah v okviru zakonodaje Skupnosti in ob upoštevanju člena 13 Direktive 95/46/ES – v interesu državne varnosti, javnega reda in varnosti – odstopajo od načela namena uporabe podatkov, ki prepoveduje prenos komercialnih podatkov, kar je edina legitimna podlaga za shranjevanje osebnih podatkov s strani zasebnih strank, in tako zmanjšajo raven varstva podatkov samo, kadar je to potrebno, sorazmerno in skladno z demokratično družbo;
Believes that only by applying Article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights, acting in the framework of Community law and having regard to Article 13 of Directive 95/46/EC, can the Member States – in the interests of state security, public order and safety – derogate from the principle of data finality banning onward forwarding of commercial data, which is the only legitimate basis for the storing of personal data by private parties, and thereby reduce the level of data protection only when this is necessary, proportional and compatible with a democratic society;
opozarja na predlog Uredbe o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose sredstev (KOM(2005)343), ki lahko prispeva k oblikovanju pravnega okvira za prenos te informacije; obžaluje, da druge institucije, zlasti Evropska centralna banka – v nasprotju z načelom lojalnega in stalnega sodelovanja med institucijami Skupnosti – med pogajanji in trialogi niso obvestile Evropskega parlamenta o obstoju prenosov podatkov iz bančnih nakazil SWIFT;
Notes the proposal for a regulation on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds (COM(2005) 343), which may contribute to establishing a legal framework for the transfer of this information; regrets that the European Parliament – contrary to the principle of loyal and constant cooperation between the Community institutions – has not been informed during negotiations and trialogues by the other institutions, in particular the European Central Bank, of the existence of the SWIFT transfers;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, Svet in Evropsko centralno banko, naj v celoti pojasnijo, v kolikšnem obsegu so bili seznanjeni o tajnem sporazumu med družbo SWIFT in ameriško vlado;
Demands that the European Commission, the Council and the European Central Bank explain fully the extent to which they were aware of the secret agreement between SWIFT and the US government;
zahteva, da se pojasni vloga in delovanje Evropske centralne banke v zvezi s tem, in poziva evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov, naj čim prej preveri, če je bila ECB dolžna v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 45/2001 z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov ukrepati glede morebitne kršitve varovanja podatkov, za katero je izvedela;
Demands in this context that the role and functioning of the European Central Bank be clarified, and asks the European Data Protection Supervisor to verify as soon as possible whether, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data, the ECB was obliged to react to the possible violation of data protection which had come to its knowledge;
opozarja, da mora ECB zagotoviti, da centralne banke dostopajo do medbančnega telekomunikacijskega omrežja (SWIFT) samo v zakonitem okviru;
Recalls that the ECB is to guarantee that central banks access SWIFT only within a legal framework;
zahteva, da države članice zagotovijo in preverijo, da na nacionalni ravni ni zakonodajnih vrzeli in da zakonodaja o varstvu podatkov Skupnosti pokriva tudi centralne banke; poziva države članice, naj sporočijo izide tega preverjanja Evropski komisiji, Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu;
Demands that the Member States ensure and verify that there is no legal lacuna at national level and that the Community data protection legislation also covers central banks; asks the Member States to transmit the results of this verification to the European Commission, the Council and the European Parliament;
zahteva, da Svet nujno pregleda in sprejme okvirni sklep o varstvu podatkov, obdelanih v okviru sodnega in policijskega sodelovanja, da se evropskim državljanom zagotovi enaka in visoka raven varstva podatkov na ozemlju celotne Unije;
Demands that the Council urgently examine and adopt the framework decision on data protection in judicial and police cooperation in order to ensure that European citizens enjoy a uniform and high level of data protection throughout the Union’s territory;
opozarja Svet zlasti na predloga sprememb 26 in 58 poročila Parlamenta, sprejetega 14. junija 2006, o okvirnem sklepu o varstvu podatkov Zapisnik s tega dne, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0258 . , ki si prizadeva za ureditev obdelovanja podatkov, ki se v javnem interesu prenesejo k zasebnim skupinam;
Draws the Council’s attention in particular to Amendments 26 and 58 of Parliament’s report adopted on 14 June 2006 on the data protection framework decision, Minutes of that date, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0258 . which aim to regulate the treatment of data transferred to private parties in the public interest;
ponovno izraža svoje razočaranje nad nepripravljenostjo Sveta, da bi premostil trenutno stanje v zakonodaji, ko v okviru prvega oziroma tretjega stebra veljata dva različna postopkovna okvira za varstvo temeljnih pravic; zato ponavlja zahtevo, da se dvojni okvir odpravi z uporabo premostitvene določbe, kar omogoča člen 42 PEU;
Reiterates its great disappointment with the Council’s unwillingness to overcome the current legislative situation, where, under either the first or the third pillar, two different procedural frameworks for the protection of fundamental rights apply; reiterates, therefore, its demand for this dual framework to be abolished by activating the bridging clause provided for in Article 42 TEU;
zahteva, da Komisija prične izvajati ocenjevanje vse sprejete protiteroristične zakonodaje EU s stališča učinkovitosti, nujnosti, sorazmernosti in spoštovanja temeljnih pravic; odločno poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pretehtata sprejem možnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi se v prihodnosti izognili ponovnim tovrstnim resnim kršitvam zasebnosti;
Requests that the Commission undertake an evaluation of all adopted EU anti-terrorist legislation from the point of view of efficiency, necessity, proportionality and respect for fundamental rights; strongly urges the Commission and Council to consider what measures should be taken to avoid future repetitions of such serious privacy breaches;
ostro obsoja kakršne koli tajne operacije na ozemlju EU, ki bi vplivale na zasebnost državljanov EU; je močno zaskrbljen, da bi se take operacije dogajale, ne da bi bili evropski državljani in njihovi parlamentarni predstavniki o tem obveščeni; poziva Združene države Amerike in njihove obveščevalne in varnostne službe, naj delujejo v duhu dobrega sodelovanja in obvestijo svoje zaveznike o kakršnih koli operacijah, ki jih nameravajo izvajati na ozemlju EU;
Strongly disapproves of any secret operations on EU territory that affect the privacy of EU citizens; is deeply concerned that such operations should be taking place without the citizens of Europe and their parliamentary representation having been informed; urges the United States and its intelligence and security services to act in a spirit of good cooperation and notify their allies of any security operations they intend to carry out on EU territory;
poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, naj skupaj z Odborom za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve čim prej opravi skupno zaslišanje Evropske centralne banke, Komisije, Sveta, Evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov ter drugih zasebnih in javnih strani, ki so povezane z zadevo, da se odkrije, katere informacije so morda pridobili;
Asks its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, together with the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, to hold, as soon as possible, a joint hearing of the European Central Bank, the Commission, the Council, the European Data Protection Supervisor and other private and public parties that are involved in the affair in order to uncover what information they may have had;
naroči svojemu Predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji Evropski centralni banki, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter držav kandidatk in vladi ter zbornicama kongresa Združenih držav Amerike.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and candidate countries, and the United States Government and the two Chambers of Congress.
– Ria Oomen-Ruijten in José Albino Silva Peneda v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Ria Oomen-Ruijten and José Albino Silva Peneda, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Martin Schulz, Stephen Hughes, Jan Andersson, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Jean Louis Cottigny, Alain Hutchinson, Edite Estrela in Jamila Madeira v imenu skupine PSE
– Martin Schulz, Stephen Hughes, Jan Andersson, Joel Hasse Ferreira, Jean Louis Cottigny, Alain Hutchinson, Edite Estrela and Jamila Madeira, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Eugenijus Maldeikis, Umberto Pirilli in Roberta Angelilli v imenu skupine UEN
– Eugenijus Maldeikis, Umberto Pirilli and Roberta Angelilli, on behalf of the UEN Group
o ekonomskih in socialnih posledicah prestrukturiranja podjetij v Evropi
on the economic and social consequences of companies restructuring in Europe
ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev iz leta 1989 in z njo povezanega akcijskega programa,
having regard to the 1989 Charter of the Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and the action programme relating thereto,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 75/129/EGS UL L 48, 22.2.1975, str.
having regard to Directive 75/129/EEC OJ L 48, 22.2.1975, p.
29. , kakor je bila spremenjena z Direktivo 92/56/EGS UL L 245, 26.8.1992, str.
29. , as amended by Directive 92/56/EEC OJ L 245, 26.8.1992, p.
3. o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic, ki se nanaša na kolektivne odpuste,
3. , on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 94/45/ES UL L 254, 30.9.1994, str.
having regard to Directive 94/45/EC OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p.
64. o ustanovitvi evropskega sveta delavcev ali uvedbi postopka obveščanja in posvetovanja z delavci v družbah ali povezanih družbah na območju Skupnosti,
64 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees,
ob upoštevanju hitrih gospodarskih in drugih sprememb, ki lahko pozitivno ali negativno vplivajo na podjetja v vseh državah članicah,
having regard to the fast transformations and economic changes that may affect companies in all the Members states, either in a positive or negative way,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 14. marca 2006 o selitvi proizvodnje v okviru regionalnega razvoja in z dne 15. marca 2006 o prestrukturiranju in zaposlovanju, ter številnih svojih prejšnjih resolucij o prestrukturiranju družb, selitvi proizvodnje, združevanju in zapiranju podjetij, zlasti tiste z dne 13. marca 2003 o zapiranju podjetij po prejetju finančne pomoči EU,
having regard to its resolutions of 14 March 2006 on relocation in the context of regional development and of 15 March 2006 on restructuring and employment, and to its numerous previous resolutions on company restructuring, relocations, mergers and closures of undertakings, especially that of 13 March 2003 on the closure of undertakings after receiving EU financial aid,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/14/ES UL L 80, 23.3.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/14/EC OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p.
29. z dne 11. marca 2002 o določitvi splošnega okvira za obveščanje in posvetovanje z delavci v Evropski skupnosti,
29. of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community,
ker bi morale družbe sprejemati poslovne odločitve, ki bi zagotovile poslovno rast podjetij, in ker bi moralo prestrukturiranje podjetij zaščititi socialni in ekonomski napredek, če bi zahtevane spremembe upoštevale izzive, ki so v spodbujanju razvoja trajnostnega gospodarstva in odločenosti, da se varujeta socialna blaginja in okolje,
whereas companies should make management decisions which secure the business growth of their enterprises, and whereas restructuring of enterprises should safeguard social and economic progress if the changes required address the challenges of fostering the development of a sustainable economy, combined with a determination to protect social welfare and environment,
ker je cilj lizbonske strategije spremeniti EU v najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično, na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu, sposobno trajne gospodarske rasti z ustvarjanjem več in boljših delovnih mest in večjo socialno kohezijo,
whereas the Lisbon Strategy is aimed at turning the EU into the world's most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy, capable of sustained economic growth accompanied by the creation of more and better jobs and greater social cohesion,