natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, da si prizadeva za krepitev zaščite geografskih označb s povišanjem zahtev in vzpostavitvijo skupnega okvira za njih na evropski ravni kakor tudi na dvoregionalni ali multiregionalni ravni, zlasti v okviru STO in Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih intelektualne lastnine (Sporazum TRIPS) za vzpostavitev multilateralnega registra vin in alkoholnih pijač, ter za boj zoper ponarejanje in kakršno koli obliko zlorabe evropskih geografskih označb in tradicionalnih poimenovanj v tretjih državah;
Calls on the Commission to make all possible efforts in order to strengthen the protection of geographical indications, by increasing the requirements and creating a common framework for them at European level as well as at biregional and multilateral level, particularly within the WTO and the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) for the setting up of a multilateral register of wines and spirits, and to combat counterfeiting and any form of misuse of European geographical indications and traditional denominations in third countries;
meni, da je treba v pogajanjih v okviru STO in dvostranskih sporazumih zagotoviti boljšo zaščito zaščitenih geografskih označb in geografskega porekla , kar bo občutno prispevalo k ohranjanju kakovostne proizvodnje vina v povezavi z lokalnimi območji in praksami;
Considers it necessary to secure better protection of protected geographical indications and protected designations of origin within the framework of the WTO negotiations and bilateral agreements, as a major contribution to maintaining quality wine production linked to local areas and practices;
poudarja, da je za večjo konkurenčnost sektorja na mednarodnih trgih za evropska vina treba oblikovati dejavno in ambiciozno zunanjetrgovinsko politiko v tesnem sodelovanju z organizacijami, ki predstavljajo evropske proizvajalce, in s hkratnim prerazporejanjem proračunskih sredstev ter uporabo ustreznih načinov;
Stresses that, in order to enhance the sector's competitiveness on international markets, a proactive and ambitious external trade policy for European wines needs to be drawn up in close cooperation with organisations representing European operators, together with a redeployment of budgetary resources and appropriate means;
poudarja, da mora zunanjetrgovinska politika za evropska vina vključevati sklepanje dvostranskih sporazumov o trgovini z vinom s tretjimi državami na osnovi vzajemnega priznavanja in zaščite geografskih označb;
Stresses the need, as part of this external trade policy for European wines, to conclude bilateral agreements with third countries on the wine trade, on the basis of mutual recognition and protection of geographical indications;
opozarja, da se je Evropska unija zavezala, da bo do leta 2013 postopoma odpravila svoje izvozne subvencije; poziva Komisijo, naj ublaži posledice zmanjšanih subvencij z večjo dostopnostjo sredstev za diverzifikacijo dohodka za proizvajalce vin in z uvedbo kvalificiranega dostopa na trg proizvodov iz vina, v kolikor je to potrebno za ohranjanje ravnovesja na evropskem trgu;
Recalls that the EU has pledged to phase out its export subsidies by 2013; calls on the Commission to mitigate the consequences of reduced subsidies by improving the availability of resources for income diversification of wine producers and by introducing qualified market access for wine products, in so far as this is necessary to preserve equilibrium in the European market;
poziva, da se vino uvrsti na seznam občutljivih izdelkov STO;
Calls for wine to be included in the WTO list of sensitive products;
verjame, da bi zaradi sedanjih posebnosti režima geografskih označb vin lahko v prvi fazi reforme (2008-2011) preučili možnost vključitve določb Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 510/2006 z dne 20. marca 2006 o zaščiti geografskih označb in označb izvora za kmetijske proizvode in živila UL L 93, 31.3.2006, str.
Believes that owing to the existing particularities of the regime of geographical indications of wines, the possibility could be examined, during the first phase of the reform (2008-2011), of incorporating the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p.
, ob upoštevanju potrebnih prilagoditev, v novo skupno ureditev trga v vinskem sektorju; opozarja, da bi bilo treba v drugi fazi reforme (2012-2015), potem ko bi bili med prvo fazo doseženi postopna klasifikacija in enotna registracija vin na nacionalni ravni in na ravni Skupnosti, preučiti primernost vključitve določb prihodnje uredbe o novi skupni ureditvi trga v vinskem sektorju, ki se nanašajo na geografske označbe, v Uredbo (ES) št. 510/2006;
subject to the necessary adjustments, in the new CMO for the wine sector; points out that during the second phase of the reform (2012-2015), once the gradual classification and uniform registration of wines has been achieved at Community and national level during the first phase, the advisability of incorporating the provisions of the future regulation on the new CMO for the wine sector relative to geographical indications in Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 should be examined;
poudarja pomen netrgovinskih vprašanj v okviru STO; poziva Komisijo, naj izdela sistem označevanja uvoženih alkoholnih pijač iz vina, ki niso v skladu z evropskimi enološkimi praksami ter zato ne bi smele biti označene kot vino;
Stresses the importance of non-trade concerns within the WTO framework; calls on the Commission to develop a labelling scheme for imported wine derived alcoholic drinks, which do not comply with the European oenological practices and therefore should not be labelled as wine;
opozarja, da predstavlja ukinitev prepovedi vinifikacije uvoženega mošta eno od največjih tveganj, ki lahko privede do denaturacije vina, izkrivljanja trga in zmanjšanja proizvodnje Skupnosti, in da mora Komisija kakršen koli sporazum, ki bi bil sklenjen v ta namen, preprečiti v okviru STO;
Points out that lifting the ban on vinification of imported must poses one of the most significant risks as regards the adulteration of wine, the distortion of the market and a reduction in Community production, and that any agreement to this end must be prevented by the Commission within the framework of the WTO;
meni, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ne bi smela dovoliti vinifikacije uvoženega mošta in njegovega mešanja z moštom, pridelanim v Skupnosti, ker takšni postopki niso v skladu z drugimi ukrepi, ki jih predlaga Komisija, kot sta krčenje ali ukinitev pomoči pri uporabi zgoščenega mošta za povečanje alkoholne stopnje;
Considers that under Community law there should be a ban on the fermentation of imported musts and on the mixing thereof with Community musts, since such procedures are not consistent with other measures proposed by the Commission, such as grubbing-up and the withdrawal of funding relating to the use of concentrated must for the purpose of increasing alcoholic proof;
poudarja, da se v okviru STO ni obvezno pogajati o možnosti medsebojnega mešanja vin, uvoženih iz tretjih držav, in mešanja teh vin z vini iz Skupnosti, zato je jasno, da se je treba takšnemu poteku dogajanj izogniti, saj bi povzročil zelo velike probleme v zvezi z izvorom, poreklom in identifikacijo proizvodov ter bi imel za posledico, da bi se zmanjšala kakovost vina, proizvedenega v evropskih državah;
Emphasises that there is no obligation to negotiate within the WTO on the possibility of blending imported wines from third countries and blending them with Community wines, and opposes such a development, since it will create enormous problems as regards the origin, provenance and identification of products, and the degradation of wine produced in European countries;
meni, da je za ohranitev kakovosti in slovesa evropskih vin bistveno, da se za njihovo proizvodnjo lahko uporabljata samo vino in mošt, ki sta pridelana v EU;
Considers it essential that in order to protect the quality and the reputation of European wines, only wines and musts produced within the EU should be admissible for the purpose of making European wines;
Mednarodna organizacija za vinsko trto in vino – dvostranski trgovinski sporazumi
International Organisation of Vine and Wine – bilateral trade agreements
verjame, da bi moral biti Svet v času, ko Evropska unija vodi težavna pogajanja v okviru STO in sklepa dvostranske sporazume s ciljem zaščititi evropske živilske proizvode, proizvode z geografskimi označbami, ekološke proizvode itd., po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom edini pristojni organ za odobritev novih enoloških postopkov, kajti če se ta pristojnost prenese na Komisijo, bosta s tem ogrožena označevanje in klasifikacija kakovostnih vin v Evropski uniji; meni, da bi bilo treba takšne enološke postopke uvrstiti na pozitivni seznam Skupnosti;
Believes, at a time when the EU is conducting difficult negotiations in the WTO and concluding bilateral agreements aimed at safeguarding European food products, products with geographical indications, organic produce, etc., the Council should – subject to consultation of the European Parliament – be the body responsible for approving new oenological practices, because if this competence is transferred to the Commission the designation and classification of quality wines in the EU would be jeopardised; considers that such oenological practices should be entered on a positive Community list ;
poziva Komisijo, naj naredi vse za preprečitev goljufij in zavajajočega označevanja geografskega porekla v tretjih državah;
Calls on the Commission to use every possible means to prevent fraud and abuses of designations of geographical origin in third countries;
meni, da skupna ureditev trga za vino ne sme biti prikrajšana za vsa finančna sredstva na evropski ravni zaradi prenosov na drugi steber skupne kmetijske politike in vrnitve ukrepov v nacionalno pristojnost, kar vodi k izkrivljanju konkurence in diskriminaciji med proizvodnimi in tržnimi strukturami ter med državami članicami;
Considers that the CMO in wine must not be deprived of all financial means at European level through transfers to the second pillar of the CAP and the return to national competence of measures opening the way to distortions of competition and discrimination between production/marketing structures and between Member States;
poudarja, da enološke prakse ne smejo zavajati potrošnikov, poslabšati kakovosti ali ustvariti nelojalne konkurence; meni, da uporaba dosedanjih dovoljenih enoloških praks ne sme biti sistematično odobrena v Evropski uniji, četudi gre za primere, ko je izvoz vina omejen na regije, kjer so takšne prakse dovoljene;
Maintains that oenological practices must not cause confusion among consumers, adulterate quality or create unfair competition; stresses that hitherto authorised oenological practices cannot be automatically authorised and approved for use in the EU, even where wines are intended for export to regions where such practices are authorised;
meni, da je koncentracija vseh enoloških praks pri Mednarodni organizaciji za vinsko trto in vino pravilna pot pod pogojem, da so ocenjene in vzpostavljene na podlagi znanstvenih in tehničnih študij ter da je zagotovljena varnost živil in zdravje ljudi;
Considers that bringing together all oenological practices under the International Organisation of Vine and Wine is a step in the right direction provided that those practices are assessed and established on the basis of scientific and technical studies, whilst guaranteeing food safety and public health;
ugotavlja, da v Evropi, zlasti v državah, ki so tradicionalne porabnice vina, poraba vina nenehno upada, kar je glavni vzrok za strukturni presežek vina; ugotavlja, da izvoz vina v zadnjih letih zastaja, uvoz pa dinamično narašča, zaradi česar je nujno, da postane evropski vinogradniški sektor bolj konkurenčen; poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma predloži poročilo o vzrokih za upad izvoza evropskih vin v zadnjih letih in nenehno rast uvoza iz tretjih držav, ter da še posebej natančno prikaže, v kakšnem obsegu se izvajajo dvostranski trgovinski sporazumi s tretjimi državami in upoštevajo legitimni trgovinski interesi Evropske unije in evropskih proizvajalcev ter ali se v odgovor na te probleme ustrezno uporabljajo mehanizmi skupne trgovinske politike;
Notes that there has been a steady drop in wine consumption in Europe, mainly in the traditional wine consuming countries, which is one of the causes of the structural surplus of wine; notes that in recent years exports of wine have stagnated, while imports have grown dynamically, making it vital that the European wine-growing sector becomes more competitive; asks the Commission to submit a report directly explaining the reasons for the fall in European wine exports in recent years and the dynamic growth in imports from third countries, specifying in particular the extent to which bilateral trading agreements with third countries have been implemented, the account taken of the legitimate trading interests of the EU and European producers and the appropriate use made of common trading policy mechanisms in response to these problems;
poudarja,da je za trajnostni razvoj evropskega vinskega sektorja treba v okviru skupne ureditve trga za vino prerazporediti znatna proračunska sredstva za spodbujanje zmerne in odgovorne potrošnje vina; meni, da spodbujanje čedalje zmernejše in odgovornejše potrošnje vina najbolj prispeva k varstvu evropskih potrošnikov in zdravju ljudi; dodaja, da je treba te ukrepe izvajati preko resničnega partnerstva med Skupnostjo, državami članicami, regijami in samim vinskim sektorjem, ki ima pri tem najpomembnejšo vlogo;
Points out that the sustainable development of the European wine sector requires the redeployment of substantial budgetary resources within the CMO in wine for the promotion of moderate responsible consumption of wines; considers that reinforcing the trend towards an increased moderate and responsible consumption of wines is a positive major contribution to the protection of European consumers and the public health; these measures must be developed by an effective partnership between the Community, the Member States, the regions and the wine sector itself, which has a major role to play;
poziva Komisijo, naj za spodbujanje kakovosti evropskih vin in za zaščito evropskih postopkov njihove proizvodnje uvede dejavno trgovinsko politiko;
Calls on the Commission to introduce a proactive trade policy to promote the quality of European wines and defend European wine-making processes;
poudarja, da bi morale prednostne naloge Komisije tudi vključevati okrepljeno spodbujanje vinskih proizvodov in večje napore pri iskanju novih porabnikov in osvajanju novih trgov, še posebej ko gre za izvoz in za nove nastajajoče trge, z izvajanjem dinamične in ambiciozne zunanjetrgovinske strategije z ustreznimi sredstvi,
Stresses that the Commission's priorities should also include stepping up promotion of wine products and efforts to win new consumers and markets, especially in connection with exports and the new emerging markets, through a proactive and ambitious external trade policy with appropriate resources;
meni, da je nujno spodbujati in financirati obveščanje potrošnikov o kakovostnih lastnostih vina, proizvedenega v Evropi v skladu z nadzorovanimi tradicionalnimi enološkimi praksami, ter jih tako zavarovati pred izdelki iz uvoza vprašljive kakovosti in spodbujati vino, proizvedeno v Evropi, na notranjem in mednarodnem trgu;
Considers that it is essential to promote and provide funding for consumer information concerning the qualitative characteristics of wine produced in Europe in accordance with controlled traditional oenological practices, in order to protect consumers from imported products of dubious quality and to promote wine produced in Europe on the internal and world markets;
Nacionalni okviri – enotna politika Skupnosti, ki temelji na programih podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja
National envelopes – uniform Community policies based on support and development programmes for the wine sector
poudarja, da je treba proračun Skupnosti ohraniti v zdajšnjih okvirih in ne prenašati sredstev iz prvega v drugi steber skupne kmetijske politike, ki zadeva razvoj podeželja, kar bi lahko privedlo do razpršitve sredstev v škodo vinskega sektorja; zahteva, da so financirani ukrepi jasno določeni, zato da bodo sredstva dejansko uporabljena v vinskemu sektorju;
Stresses the need to maintain the Community budget and not to transfer funds from the first pillar to the second pillar of the CAP, which concerns rural development, since this might result in the dilution of resources at the expense of the wine sector; demands that measures eligible for funding be clearly specified, so as to guarantee that funds are in fact used for the wine sector;
priporoča, naj se na osnovi ciljev trajnostno in konkurenčno naravnane reforme skupne ureditve trga za vino oblikuje okvir Skupnosti, ki se bo lahko izvajal na nacionalni/regionalni ravni, vključno s financiranjem, ki mora izhajati iz prvega stebra skupne kmetijske politike, tj. iz sredstev skupne ureditve trga za vino; meni, da lahko ta politika zajema prestrukturiranje vinogradov, ukrepe za izboljšanje evidentiranja in trženja, kmetijske prakse in okoljske standarde za namene upravljanja kakovosti, mehanizem upravljanja v kriznih razmerah, raziskave na področju proizvodnje in boljšega trženja proizvodov, odzivanje na naravne nesreče, spodbujanje in informiranje potrošnikov ter krčenje in, v prehodni fazi, zasebno skladiščenje, ukrepe v zvezi z destilacijo in druge veljavne tržne mehanizme;
Recommends, on the basis of the objectives of a viable and competitive reform of the CMO in wine, that a Community framework be laid down, which may be implemented at national/regional level, including in relation to means of funding which must come under the first pillar of the CAP, i.e. CMO in wine resources; believes that these policies may include: restructuring of vineyards, measures to improve recording and marketing structures, agricultural cultivation practices and environmental standards within the framework of quality management, crisis management mechanisms, research into the production and improved marketing of products, addressing natural disasters and promotion and information of consumers and grubbing-up, and, during a transitional phase, private storage, distillation measures and other valid market mechanisms;
poudarja, da mora imeti pri reviziji skupne ureditve trga za vino prednost oblikovanje politike, ki spodbuja konkurenčnost in prispeva k boljši kakovosti evropskih vin; poudarja, da je treba dodeliti sredstva Skupnosti posameznim nacionalnim programom podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja na podlagi skupnih meril, zato da ne bo prihajalo do neenake obravnave držav članic in regij;
Stresses that the reform of the CMO in wine should give priority to framing policies which will contribute to strengthening competitiveness and improving the quality of European wines; maintains that Community resources should be allocated to the national support and development programmes for the wine sector on the basis of common criteria so that there are no disparities between Member States or regions;
poudarja, da je treba pri izbiri postopka dodelitve sredstev Skupnosti posameznim nacionalnim programom podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja upoštevati, da se za ukrepe tržnih intervencij, ki so jih v državah članicah uporabljali na povsem različne načine, črpa znaten delež sredstev sedanje skupne ureditve trga za vino;
Stresses that, in selecting the method of allocating Community resources to each national support and development programme for the wine sector, account should be taken of the fact that market intervention measures - which have been used in totally different ways by Member States – absorb a significant portion of the resources of the current CMO in wine;
meni, da se lahko na podlagi primerjave statističnih podatkov o proizvodnji in velikosti vinorodnega območja v posameznih državah članicah v določenem obdobju, na primer od leta 2001 do leta 2005, dodelijo sredstva proračuna iz nacionalnega okvira, ki bi posameznim državam članicam omogočila, da bi v okviru proračunskih sredstev, ki bi jim bila dodeljena, in v skladu z objektivnimi merili uporabile instrumente, ki se jim zdijo primerni v normativnem okviru, predhodno določenem na ravni Skupnosti, znotraj katerega bi načrtovani ukrepi predvideli enako pomoč za vse države članice;
Considers that, based on statistical data of production and surface area of wine cultivation, in each Member State during a given period, for instance the period 2001-2005, the budget of the national envelopes may be allocated at the outset, so as to enable each Member State to use - within its appointed "envelope" – whatever tools it considers appropriate within a regulatory framework established in advance at Community level in accordance with objective criteria, within which framework the measures laid down will provide the same support for all the Member States;
vseeno meni, da bi lahko predvideli še drugo veljavno rešitev, ki temelji na sredstvih, ki jih uporabljajo posamezne države članice v zdajšnji skupni ureditvi trga za vino, ali na oblikovanju formule in/ali mešanega merila, ki upošteva pretekle podatke, velikost vinograda, pridelane in tržene količine za vsako posamezno državo članico, s čimer bi zagotovili sistem upravičenosti do premij, ki bi bil v skladu s cilji reforme;
Considers, however, that a second valid solution might also be one based on the amounts used by each Member State during the current CMO in wine, or the drawing up of a formula and/or mixed criterion that takes into account historical data, the size of the vineyard and the quantities produced and marketed for each Member State, thereby ensuring a system of premiums that would meet the objectives of the reform;
meni, da mora imeti država članica za izboljšanje svojih strukturnih posegov v vinskem sektorju možnost pridobiti dodatno pomoč (če misli, da je to potrebno), ki se lahko sofinancira iz drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike, če gre za upravičene ukrepe; meni, da se ti ukrepi nanašajo predvsem na kombinacijo strukturnih ukrepov in shem predčasne upokojitve ter politiko podpore mladim kmetovalkam in kmetovalcem;
Considers it indispensable, where a Member State considers supplementary aid for improving its structural interventions in the wine sector to be necessary, that it can also co-fund them from the second pillar of the CAP in the case of eligible actions; considers that these actions concern chiefly a combination of structural interventions and early retirement schemes and policies for supporting young men and women farmers;
meni, da novih nasadov ni mogoče vključiti v dejavnosti, ki so upravičene do financiranja;
Considers that new plantings may not be included in eligible funded actions;
meni, da mora vsaka reforma skupne ureditve trga za vino varovati in okrepiti konkurenčnost proizvajalcev evropskih vin; poudarja, da sta pri tem bistvenega pomena inovativna sposobnost in dinamičnost;
Notes that any reform of the CMO in wine must protect and strengthen the competitiveness of European wine producers; stresses that innovative capacity and dynamism are vital aspects in this connection;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs the President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zunanji dimenziji boja proti mednarodnemu terorizmu ( 2006/2032(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the external dimension of the fight against international terrorism ( 2006/2032(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 ter naslova V Pogodbe o EU,
having regard to Articles 6 and 7 and Title V of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah z dne 10. decembra 1948,
having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane v Rimu dne 4. novembra 1950,
having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950,