natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
močno podpira predlog Komisije o finančni pomoči najbolj obrobnim regijam v višini 1,1 milijarde EUR in možnost financiranja tekočega poslovanja, kot je predvideno v členu 11 predloga Uredbe o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj ( KOM(2004)0495 ); zahteva, da se v celoti praktično izrazi zahtevo iz člena 299(2) Pogodbe ES o obravnavanju najbolj oddaljenih regij kot posebnega primera pri njihovem dostopu do Strukturnih skladov, vključno s tistimi regijami, katerih BDP se je že povečal nad 75 % povprečja Skupnosti;
Strongly supports the special action of EUR 1 100 million for the outermost regions proposed by the Commission, as well as the possibility of financing operating aid, as provided in Article 11 of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Regional Development Fund ( COM(2004)0495 ); calls for full practical expression to be given to the requirement laid down in Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty for the outermost regions to be treated as a special case as regards their access to the Structural Funds, including those regions whose GDP has already risen above 75% of the Community average;
zahteva ohranjanje nacionalnega strateškega referenčnega okvira, ki je v pripravi v tesnem sodelovanju s partnerji iz člena 10 in ki mora ostati predmet odločitve Komisije, izpogajane v okviru partnerstva (člen 26);
Calls for the maintenance of a national strategic reference framework which is prepared in close cooperation with the partners referred to in Article 10 and which must remain the subject of a Commission decision negotiated within the framework of the partnership (Article 26);
zahteva vključitev možnosti, da se pregleda nacionalni strateški referenčni okvir (člen 26);
Calls for the inclusion of the possibility for the national strategic reference framework to be revised (Article 26);
zahteva poenostavitev strateškega nadaljnjega ukrepanja, tako da države članice in Komisija o tem poročajo po preteklem obdobju dveh let (člena 27 in 28); v tej zvezi poziva k razpravi v strateškem forumu na vsake dve leti, v katerem sodelujejo Evropski parlament, Komisija, Odbor regij ter države članice (člen 29);
Calls for a simplification of the strategic follow-up so that there is reporting by the Member States and the Commission every two years (Articles 27 and 28); calls in this context for a debate every two years in a strategic forum involving Parliament, the Commission, the Committee of the Regions and the Member States (Article 29);
v zvezi s pristopom enega sklada na program zahteva povečanje s 5 % na 10 %, ki predstavljajo mejo, do katere lahko ESS ali ESRR financirata ukrepe, ki spadajo v okvir drugega sklada (člen 33); vseeno pa predlaga, da lahko Komisija v nekaterih okoliščinah odobri isti upravljalni organ, ki bo vodil več kot eno intervencijo, pri čemer se mora še vedno uporabljati meja 10 %;
Calls in the context of the single Fund per programme approach, for an increase from 5% to 10% as a limit up to which either the ESF or the ERDF may fund measures falling within the scope of the other Fund (Article 33); however, suggests that in certain circumstances the Commission may grant approval for the same management authority to preside over more than one intervention, but that the 10% limit should still apply;
da bi poudaril urbano razsežnost ter predvsem izpostavil trajnostni razvoj urbanega okolja, zahteva, da se pri operativnih programih, ki se jih financira iz Strukturnega sklada in so predloženi v okviru cilja konvergence in cilja regionalne konkurenčnosti ter zaposlovanja, vztraja na zahtevi, da so podatki predloženi na podlagi pristopa k urbanim vprašanjem in vključujejo seznam urbanih območij, izbranih v postopku nadaljnjega prenosa pooblastil; zahteva, da so ti postopki postavljeni v okvir regionalnega in lokalnega partnerstva; meni, da mora biti višina finančne pomoči enaka znesku, do katerega so v skladu z obstoječo uredbo upravičena urbana območja (člen 36);
Calls, in order to highlight the urban dimension and in particular sustainable urban development, for structural fund financed operational programmes under the "Convergence" and "Regional competitiveness and employment" objectives to maintain the requirement for information to be submitted on the approach to the urban issue, including the list of urban areas chosen and the procedures for sub-delegation; calls for such procedures to be placed in the context of regional and local partnership; considers that the level of funding must be at least equivalent to that for which urban areas are eligible under the current regulation (Article 36);
zahteva, da trije skladi upoštevajo prednostne naloge malih in mikropodjetij, še zlasti obrtnih podjetij, glede na pomembnost kohezijskega in regionalnega razvoja ter njihovega prispevka k rasti in zaposlovanju, in podpirajo izvajanje načel in smernic delovanja Evropske listine za mala podjetja, ki jo je leta 2000 sprejel Evropski svet v Santi Marii de Feiri;
Calls for the three Funds to take account of the priorities of small and micro enterprises, particularly craft enterprises, given their importance for cohesion and regional development and their contribution to growth and employment, and to support the implementation of the principles and action lines of the European Charter for Small Enterprises adopted by the Feira European Council in 2000;
meni, da bi morale države članice opredeliti ukrepe za strateško okoljsko presojo pri nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirih in operativnih programih ter zagotoviti pravočasno presojo vplivov na okolje pri večjih infrastrukturnih projektih; nadalje poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da večji infrastrukturni projekti ne bodo v neskladju z varstvom in izboljšanjem okolja; (členi 38 do 40); poziva, da se začasno prekinejo plačila za začete projekte, ki kršijo okoljsko zakonodajo EU;
Considers that Member States should specify the arrangements for the Strategic Environmental Assessment of national strategic reference frameworks and operational programmes, and ensure timely Environmental Impact Assessments of the major infrastructure projects; further calls on the Commission to ensure that major infrastructure projects do not conflict with the protection and improvement of the environment (Articles 38 to 40); calls for payments to projects undertaken in breach of EU environmental legislation to be suspended;
zahteva skladen pristop in ohranjanje postopkov strukturnih skladov, če se sedanji sosedski programi spremenijo v programe v skladu z novimi instrumenti sodelovanja za zunanje meje Unije (ESP in predpristopni instrument IPA);
Calls for a coherent approach and the maintenance of Structural Funds procedures when the current neighbourhood programmes are transformed into programmes under the new cooperation instruments for the external borders of the Union (ENPI and IPA);
zahteva, da se ohrani predlog rezerve Skupnosti za kakovost in učinkovitost kot mehanizem nagrajevanja napredka, vključno s Kohezijskem skladom; vendar poziva k oblikovanju bolj poštenih, objektivnih in splošno sprejemljivih meril, da se zagotovi uresničevanje namena (člen 48);
Calls for the retention of the proposal for a Community reserve for quality and performance as a mechanism for rewarding progress including the Cohesion Fund; calls, however, for fair, objective, transparent and jointly adopted criteria to apply, so as to ensure that it genuinely achieves this purpose (Article 48);
zahteva izrecne pogoje in priznanje načela ter omogočanja dostopa za invalidne osebe v strateških smernicah in v ocenjevalnem postopku, ki ga zahtevajo strateške smernice;
Calls for an explicit requirement and recognition of the principle and practice of accessibility for disabled persons in the strategic guidelines and in the evaluation process required by the strategic guidelines;
zahteva, da so države članice, ki tako želijo, sposobne zagotoviti nacionalno varnostno rezervo in priporoča, da se v načine izvajanje uvede večja fleksibilnost (člen 49);
Calls for Member States which so wish to be able to make provision for a national contingency reserve and recommends that greater flexibility be introduced into the means of its implementation (Article 49);
zavrača nujnost spremembe predlaganih stopenj sofinanciranja (člen 51), zahteva pa podvojitev dovoljenega povečanja na 10 odstotnih točk za tista območja, ki so zaradi več kot ene geografske ali naravne danosti omejene, kakor je opredeljeno v predlogu; zahteva tudi uvedbo povišanja za 10 odstotnih točk za mestna območja (člen 52);
Rejects pressure to change the proposed co-financing rates (Article 51), but calls for a doubling of the permitted increase to 10 percentage points for those areas suffering from more than one of the geographical or natural handicaps defined in the proposal; calls also for the introduction of an increase of 10 percentage points for urban areas (Article 52);
močno podpira vse spodbude, dane za mobilizacijo zasebnega kapitala in spodbujanje javno-zasebnih partnerstev v novem načrtovanem obdobju (člena 50(d) in 54); meni, da pomeni izračun stopnje sofinanciranja s strani Skupnosti kot delež le prijavljenih javnih izdatkov pomemben predlog za poenostavitev te uredbe in bolje zagotavlja uporabo načela dodatnosti, ne glede na to, ali bi javne izdatke stopnje sofinanciranja držav članic delno lahko zamenjal zasebni kapital znotraj programa; hkrati poziva k ohranitvi gibljivosti, ki je zagotovljena z izračunom stopnje sofinanciranja za vsako prednostno nalogo in ne za posamezen ukrep (člena 51 in 76); kljub temu poudarja, da izračun stopnje sofinanciranja ne sme biti takšen, da bi posegal v sodelovanje NVO in drugih neprofitnih organizacij v dejavnostih Strukturnega sklada;
Strongly supports all the incentives that are given for the mobilisation of private capital and the promotion of public-private partnerships in the new programming period (Articles 50(d) and 54); considers that the calculation of the Community co-financing rate as a percentage of only the declared public expenditure constitutes an important simplifying proposal of this Regulation and better ensures the application of the principle of additionality, disregarding whether public expenditure of the co-financing rate of the Member State could be partly replaced by private capital within the programme; calls, at the same time, for the maintenance of the flexibility provided by the calculation of the co-financing rate for each priority and not for each measure (Articles 51 and 76); stresses, however, that the calculation of the co-financing rate should not be such as to prejudice the participation of NGOs and other not-for-profit organisations in Structural Fund activities;
opozarja zlasti na dejstvo, da morajo vse politike EU prispevati k cilju gospodarske in socialne kohezije ter da je k temu cilju zavezana tudi notranja trgovinska politika in se je ne sme obravnavati kot izjemo; poziva k oblikovanju trgovinske politike tako, da se preventivno preprečijo učinki šoka za regije, in opozarja zlasti na to, da selitev podjetij ali delov proizvodnje pomeni veliko grožnjo za regionalni razvoj;
Draws particular attention to the fact that all EU policies must be required to contribute to the objective of economic and social cohesion and that international trade policy is also committed to this objective and must not be regarded as an exception; calls for trade policy to be designed to avoid producing shock effects on regions and draws particular attention to the fact that the relocation of firms or production units represents a serious threat to regional development;
meni, da je predlog Komisije, da se naložijo kazni podjetjem, ki premeščajo svoje dejavnosti, neizogiben ukrep, da podjetja s svojimi dejavnostmi ne bi ogrozila utrditve ekonomske, socialne in ozemeljske kohezije v zadevni regiji; predlaga uvedbo sistema izračunavanja gospodarskih in socialnih stroškov premestitev podjetij kot sredstva za določanje ustreznih kazni; obenem poziva k sprejetju vseh potrebnih pravnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da podjetja, ki prejemajo finančno pomoč Skupnosti, ne bi svoje obrate za daljše ali vnaprej določeno obdobje premestila na drugo območje;
Considers that the Commission proposal to impose financial corrections on firms that relocate their activities is an indispensable measure, in order not to put in jeopardy the consolidation of economic, social and territorial cohesion in the affected regions; proposes the establishment of monitoring systems in order to quantify the economic and social costs of any relocation so that appropriate penalties may be set accordingly; calls, at the same time, for the adoption of all necessary legal measures to ensure that firms which receive Community funding do not relocate for a long and predetermined period;
poziva k določbi, s katero bi se prepovedalo sofinanciranje projektov, ki imajo za posledico bistveno izgubo delovnih mest ali zapiranje obratov na njihovih obstoječih lokacijah;
Calls for a provision whereby co-financing of operations, which result in substantial job losses or the closure of plants at their existing locations, will be ruled out;
zahteva, da se sklicevanja na visoko raven spretnosti, znanja in usposobljenosti za vodenje projekta vključi kot bistven element pri zagotavljanju, da so projekti izvedeni pravočasno in v skladu s proračunom (člen 57);
Calls for the inclusion of a reference to the need for a high level of project management skills and qualifications as an essential element in ensuring that projects are delivered on time and on budget (Article 57);
poziva k učinkoviti uporabi načela sorazmernosti pri programiranju (členi 31 do 37), ocenjevanju (člen 45) in upravljanju, spremljanju in nadzoru (členi 57 do 73) v skladu z velikostjo programov; razen tega meni, da je treba v teh območjih načelo poenostavitve uporabiti za vse programe v interesu vseh držav članic;
Calls for the proportionality principle to be applied effectively to programming (Articles 31 to 37), evaluation (Article 45) and management, monitoring and controls (Articles 57 to 73) in accordance with the size of the programmes; considers, moreover, that in these areas the principle of simplification must be applied to all programmes in the interests of all the Member States;
opozarja, da imajo Komisija in države članice skupno odgovornost za strukturne sklade; poziva države članice k predložitvi letnih izjav o zagotovitvi, da je bil denar davkoplačevalcev porabljen na pravilen, zakonit in pregleden način; poziva, da te izjave podpiše finančni minister posamezne države članice; Komisija mora jasno opredeliti, kaj pomeni "nepravilnost" za namene poročanja držav članic;
Notes that the Commission and the Member States have joint responsibility for the Structural Funds; calls on the Member States to make annual declarations of assurance that EU taxpayers' money has been spent in a regular, legal and transparent manner; calls for these declarations to be signed by the finance minister of each Member State; the Commission should define clearly what it means by "irregularity" for reporting purposes by Member States;
zahteva, da se ohranja duh predlaganih omejitev v zvezi z dogovori o sorazmernem nadzoru (33 % sofinanciranja in 250 milijonov EUR stroškov), pod katerimi Komisija ne izvaja sistematičnega nadzora ; kljub temu zahteva, da se upoštevajo posebne značilnosti različnih skladov (člen 73);
Calls for the spirit of the proposed limits in respect of proportional control arrangements (33% co-financing and EUR 250 million cost) below which no systematic controls are undertaken by the Commission to be maintained; calls nevertheless for the specific characteristics of the different funds to be taken into account (Article 73);
zavrača kakršno koli spremembo predlaganih zneskov predfinanciranja (člen 81);
Rejects any change to the proposed pre-financing amounts (Article 81);
zavrača vsako nadaljnjo slabitev pravila N + 2 v povezavi s strukturnimi skladi razen gibljivosti, ki je bila že predlagana za velike projekte, ker so bile koristi tega pravila dokazane z njegovo uspešnostjo pri izboljšanju učinkovitega izvajanja skladov v trenutnem načrtovanem obdobju (člen 93); poziva pa k večji gibljivosti Kohezijskega sklada;
Rejects any further weakening of the N+2 rule for the Structural Funds beyond the flexibility already proposed for major projects, since the benefits of this rule have been demonstrated through its effectiveness in improving the efficient implementation of Funds over the current programming period (Article 93); calls, however, for greater flexibility to be allowed for the Cohesion Fund;
zahteva uvedbo večje gibljivosti, da se tako podaljša predlagani rok dveh mesecev za države članice za izpodbijanje finančnih popravkov Skupnosti; zahteva, da se ta rok spreminja glede na resnost obravnavanega problema (člen 100);
Calls for greater flexibility to be introduced so as to extend the proposed two-month deadline for Member States to challenge financial corrections by the Commission; calls for this time-limit to be varied in accordance with the seriousness of the problem at issue (Article 100);
poziva Komisijo, da v sodelovanju s kohezijskimi državami poišče rešitev v zvezi z nepovračljivim DDV ob zagotavljanju enostavne dostopnosti občin do skladov;
Asks the Commission to find, in cooperation with the cohesion countries, a solution with regard to the issue of the eligibility of non-reimbursable VAT, ensuring straightforward accessibility for municipalities to Funds;
zavrača vsak poskus, da bi bili stroški, ki ne veljajo za naložbo, kot so stroški za prenočišče, prikazani kot upravičeni izdatki pri izračunavanju sofinanciranja Skupnosti; vendar meni, da se mora stroške v zvezi z obnovo socialnih stanovanj z namenom varčevanja z energijo, varovanja okolja in izpolnitve cilja socialne kohezije vključiti v upravičene izdatke;
Rejects any attempt to introduce expenses which do not relate to investment, such as housing costs, as eligible expenditure for the purposes of calculating Community co-financing; considers, however, that expenses which relate to renovation of social housing with a view to saving energy and protecting the environment should be included within eligible expenditure;
zavrača vsako zmanjšanje zgornje meje za državne pomoči konvergentnim regijam, vključno s tistimi, ki so podvržene statističnemu učinku; zahteva, da se vse regije, ki jih zajema cilj "konvergence", tudi obravnava enako glede na pravila o pomoči, in da spadajo pod člen 87(3)(a) Pogodbe o ES; zahteva postopen prehod zgornjih meja za regije naravnega učinka znotraj konvergenčnega cilja; poudarja potrebo po ohranjanju teritorialne diferenciacije, zlasti v zvezi z geografskimi ali naravnimi omejitvami, pri uporabi državnih pomoči za regije zunaj cilja konvergence;
Rejects any reduction in the ceilings for State aids to convergence regions, including those subject to the statistical effect; calls, therefore, for all regions covered by the "Convergence" objective also to be given equal treatment in terms of aid rules and to come under Article 87(3)(a) of the EC Treaty; calls moreover for a gradual transition in aid ceilings for the natural effect regions; stresses the need for the maintenance of territorial differentiation, with particular regard to natural or geographical handicaps, in the application of State aids to regions outside of the "Convergence" objective;
naroči predsedniku, naj zahteva nadaljnjo razpravo s Svetom v skladu s členom 75(3) svojega Poslovnika;
Instructs its President to request further discussion with the Council pursuant to Rule 75(3) of its Rules of Procedure;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi Kohezijskega sklada ( KOM(2004)0494 – 2004/0166(AVC) )
European Parliament resolution on the proposal for a Council Regulation establishing a Cohesion Fund ( COM(2004)0494 - 2004/0166(AVC) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2004)0494 – 2004/0166(AVC) ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation ( COM(2004)0494 - 2004/0166(AVC) ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 161 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 161 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o tretjem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2004 on the third report on economic and social cohesion OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. junija 2005 o političnih izzivih in proračunskih sredstvih razširjene Unije 2007-2013 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0224 .
having regard to its resolution of 8 June 2005 on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0224 .
in zlasti mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ter sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o finančni perspektivi 2007-2013 ( KOM(2004)0487 ),
and in particular the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development on this subject, and to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013 ( COM(2004)0487 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu ( KOM(2004)0492 – 2004/0163(AVC) ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund ( COM(2004)0492 - 2004/0163(AVC) ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju vmesnega poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenji Odbora za proračun in Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0178/2005 ),
having regard to the interim report of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets, the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0178/2005 ),
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj upoštevata naslednja priporočila:
Requests the Council and the Commission to take into account the following recommendations:
meni, da morajo gospodarska, socialna in ozemeljska kohezija ostati ključni in temeljni del opredelitve evropske integracije; in zato meni, da mora Kohezijski sklad še naprej služiti cilju Unije, ki je spodbujanje kohezije in solidarnosti med državami članicami,
considers that economic, social and territorial cohesion must remain a key basic component in defining European integration; considers therefore that the Cohesion Fund must continue to serve the Union's objective of promoting cohesion and solidarity between Member States;
zahteva, da se je v novem obdobju, pri razpravljanju o gospodarski in socialni koheziji, treba sklicevati tudi na koncept ozemeljske kohezije, ter da se mora posebna pozornost posvetiti vidiku razvoja tega novega koncepta,
requests that, during the new period, wherever there is a reference to economic and social cohesion, reference also be made to the concept of territorial cohesion and that special attention be paid to developing this new concept;
meni, da je treba poiskati politično rešitev za ozemlja Unije, ki bodo v prihodnje zaradi širitve izključena,
considers that a political solution should be sought for the territories of the Union that will be excluded in future as a result of enlargement;
podpira cilje Kohezijskega sklada in glavna sredstva, ki se uporabljajo za doseganje teh ciljev, kakor je predlagala Komisija,
supports the objectives of the Cohesion Fund and the principal means deployed for attaining them as proposed by the Commission;
poziva k podpori za zvišanje sredstev, dodeljenih Kohezijskemu skladu, z 18 milijard EUR (za obdobje 2000-2006) na 62,99 milijard EUR, ter za uravnoteženo razdelitev med upravičene okoljske sektorje in sektorje prometne infrastrukture, z določeno prilagodljivostjo pri intervencijah sklada,
asks for support for the increase in the financial allocation for the Cohesion Fund from EUR 18 000 million (for the period 2000-2006) to EUR 62 990 million and for a balanced distribution between the eligible sectors of the environment and transport infrastructure coupled with some flexibility in intervention by the Fund;