natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je Lamfalussyjev postopek koristen mehanizem; meni, da je približevanje nadzornih praks ključnega pomena; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja delo odborov na tretji ravni in podpira njihovo zahtevo po ustreznih orodjih; verjame, da lahko manevrski prostor za nadzornike omogoči odstranitev večine obremenitev tehničnih podrobnosti v zakonodaji in določitev ustreznih pravil za dinamičen trg; poudarja pa, da to ne more odvzeti politične odgovornosti za končne cilje; vztraja, da bi zakonodajalci morali skrbno spremljati postopek, in ponavlja, da morajo biti pristojnosti Parlamenta v zakonodajnem postopku v celoti spoštovane;
Is of the opinion that the Lamfalussy procedure is a useful mechanism; considers the convergence of supervisory practices to be crucial; welcomes the work of the Level 3 committees in this respect and supports their call for an adequate toolbox; believes that giving supervisors room for manoeuvre can remove much of the burden of technical detail in legislation and produce adequate rules for a dynamic market; stresses, however, that this can never take away the political responsibility as regards the final objectives; insists that legislators should carefully monitor the process and reiterates that Parliament's rights in the legislative procedure should be fully respected;
meni, da bi morala Komisija redno pregledovati ustreznost zakonodaje v obravnavi in ne le ob začetku mandata ter da bi morala umakniti predloge, ki niso več ustrezni, in biti pri tem posebej pozorna na tiste, ki so v obravnavi že dalj časa;
Believes that the Commission should review the relevance of pending legislation on an ongoing basis and not only upon taking office, and that it should withdraw proposals which are no longer pertinent, paying particular attention to those which have been outstanding for some time;
poudarja, da je treba poenostaviti tudi stike med Komisijo in državljani, to je na področjih javnih naročil, finančnih storitev, raziskovalnih programov, predpisov o državni pomoči in prošenj za subvencije;
Underlines that simplification is also required in the Commission's interaction with citizens, e.g. in the areas of procurement, financial services, research programmes, State aid rules and grant applications;
načeloma podpira hitrejše sprejetje nerešenih predlogov za poenostavitev, vendar meni, da je treba za vsak posamezni primer oceniti, ali imajo predlogi širše posledice, saj bo v tem primeru potrebno več časa;
Supports in principle the quicker adoption of pending simplification proposals, but considers it necessary to assess on a case-by-case basis whether a proposal has broader implications, in which case more time will be required;
se zaveda dejstva, da se lahko zakonodajno delo znotraj Unije opravlja na bolj sistematičen način; zato poziva Komisijo, da ponovno pregleda svoje delovne metode in način organizacije ter tako omogoči obravnavo različnih vprašanj na bolj horizontalen način, glavni nameni tega pa so zagotavljanje večje skladnosti, razvijanje potencialnih sinergij in preprečevanje neskladnosti;
Is conscious of the fact that the legislative work within the Union could be undertaken in a more systemic way; therefore calls on the Commission to reconsider its working methods and the way it is organised so as to be able to address various issues in a more horizontal manner, the main purpose being to ensure greater coherence, to build on possible synergies and to avoid inconsistencies;
meni, da bi Komisija pri umikanju predlogov, ki so v obravnavi, morala upoštevati stališča Parlamenta, da ohrani bistvene elemente zaupanja med Komisijo in Parlamentom;
Considers that the Commission should take the views of Parliament into consideration when withdrawing pending proposals, in order to maintain the essential element of trust between the Commission and Parliament;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije, s katero ta umika 68 predlogov zaradi neskladnosti s cilji Lizbonske strategije in s načeli boljše pravne ureditve, vendar obžaluje, da je Komisija umaknila predlog direktive o statutu evropske vzajemne družbe, čeprav je to eden izmed ključnih elementov Lizbonske strategije, in zato poziva Komisijo, da sprejme pobudo pred koncem leta 2007 za pripravo statutov za evropsko vzajemno družbo in za evropsko združenje;
Welcomes the Commission communication withdrawing 68 proposals that it considered inconsistent with the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy and the principles of better regulation, but regrets that the Commission has withdrawn the proposal for a directive on the Statute for a European mutual society despite the fact that it is one of the key elements of the Lisbon Strategy, and therefore calls on the Commission to adopt an initiative before the end of 2007 to enable a Statute for a European mutual society and a European association to be drafted;
sprejema dejstvo, da morata tako Svet kot Parlament upoštevati učinek svojih pomembnejših predlogov sprememb na presojo vplivov Komisije; poudarja potrebo po analizi stroškov in koristi, ki bolje odraža zapletene regulativne stroškovne strukture, ko se direktive izvajajo z nacionalnimi zakonodajami in spremenijo regulativni okvir, v katerem delujejo podjetja in posamezniki; podpira preglednost in neodvisno preverjanje izvajanja ocen učinka, za kar so v celoti odgovorni zakonodajalci v kontekstu njihovih političnih prednostnih nalog;
Accepts that the Council, like Parliament, must consider the impact of its major amendments upon the Commission's impact assessment; stresses the need for cost-benefit analyses that better reflect the complex regulatory cost structures when directives are implemented by way of national legislation and change the regulatory framework within which companies and individuals operate; strongly advocates transparency and independent scrutiny of the carrying-out of impact assessments under the full responsibility of the legislators in the context of their political priorities;
v celoti podpira vsa prizadevanja Komisije za splošno krepitev izvrševanja zakonodaje Skupnosti z bolj preventivnimi ukrepi in spremljanjem držav članic od začetka, da se omogoči pravilen prenos ključnih direktiv, ter priporoča Evropskemu parlamentu, da ustrezno sodeluje pri takšnih pobudah;
Fully supports any efforts on the part of the Commission aimed at the general strengthening of the enforcement of Community law through more preventive action, coupled with a process of following matters up with Member States at an early stage so as to facilitate the correct transposition of key directives, and recommends that Parliament be duly associated with such initiatives;
meni, da mora Komisija pri spremljanju uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti v državah članicah od držav članic zahtevati pripravo primerjalnih tabel in zapisov o prenosu ter jih k temu ne le pozvati, zlasti za preverjanje posameznega nacionalnega postopka prenosa direktiv; zato meni, da bi Komisija morala države članice pozvati k sprejetju skupne referenčne metodologije;
Considers that, when monitoring the application of Community law by Member States, the Commission should oblige, and not merely invite, Member States to produce correlation tables and transposition notes, especially with a view to checking each national process of transposition of directives; to that end, is of the opinion that the Commission should call on Member States to adopt a common reference methodology;
meni, da poudarjanje pomena ocene učinka ne bi smelo voditi do situacije v Komisiji, ko bi se sredstva, namenjena nadzorovanju pravilnemu prenosu prava Skupnosti in za obravnavanje primerov kršitev, prerazporedila za ocene učinka; poudarja potrebo, da se povečajo sredstva za zagotavljanje, da se učinkovito nadzoruje izvrševanje prava Skupnosti;
Considers that the emphasis placed on the importance of impact assessments should not lead to a situation within the Commission whereby resources intended for monitoring the correct transposition of Community law and for processing cases of infringement are re-allocated to impact assessments; stresses the need to increase resources aimed at ensuring that the application of Community law is effectively monitored;
obžaluje prakso pretiranega nacionalnega reguliranja pri izvrševanja predpisov (t. i. "gold plating") in poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kateri nadaljnji ukrepi bi lahko bili sprejeti za njeno preprečitev, vključno z uvedbo pravice državljanov do neposredne tožbe; poziva k "naknadni oceni učinka", ki bo analizirala, kako se odločitve v državah članicah in na lokalni ravni dejansko izvajajo; podpira povečanje ustrezne uporabe uredb;
Deplores Member States' practice of 'gold plating', and calls upon the Commission to investigate what further measures might be taken to prevent it, including the introduction of a right of direct action for citizens; calls for 'follow-up impact assessments' analysing how decisions are in fact implemented in Member States and at local level; supports the increased use, where appropriate, of regulations;
opozarja na pomen razumne uporabe klavzule o časovni omejitvi veljavnosti pri zagotavljanju ustreznosti zakonodaje;
Recalls the importance of the judicious use of 'sunset clauses' in ensuring that legislation remains pertinent;
vztraja, da se mora pri predstavitvi zakonodajnih predlogov Komisija izogibati nejasnim in odvečnim izrazom ter raje uporabljati preprost in razumljiv jezik, pri čemer ohrani terminološko natančnost in pravno gotovost; predvsem meni, da je treba opustiti uporabo nerazumljivih kratic in preveč nepotrebnih uvodnih izjav; obenem spodbuja vse vladne službe, naj uporabljajo jasen jezik, ki ga bodo državljani razumeli;
Insists that, when presenting a legislative proposal, the Commission must avoid unclear and redundant expressions and preferably use plain and comprehensible language, whilst retaining terminological precision and legal certainty; considers, in particular, that the practice of using incomprehensible acronyms and the over-abundance of needless recitals must be abandoned; encourages all levels of government to use, whenever possible, clear language that is easily understandable by citizens;
poziva Komisijo, naj si pri oblikovanju boljše pravne ureditve prizadeva, da bodo novi predpisi in njihovo izvajanje skladni, opravičljivi, pregledni in razumljivi za zainteresirane strani in upravičence;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure, while developing better regulation, that new regulations and their enforcement are consistent, justifiable, transparent and comprehensible for stakeholders and for beneficiaries;
poziva Komisijo, da v primeru uredb vnaprej pripravi napotke o izvajanju, ki bodo v pomoč državam članicam, regionalnim in lokalnim organom ter specializiranim agencijam;
Calls on the Commission, in the case of regulations, to produce in advance guidance notes on implementation for the benefit of the Member States, regional and local authorities and specialised agencies;
ponovno poudarja, da mora boljša pravna ureditev vedno pomeniti polno sodelovanje Parlamenta v medinstitucionalnih razpravah in kot sozakonodajalca pri sprejemanju zakonodaje, ki je predmet takšnega postopka; poudarja tudi, da lahko Evropski parlament kadar koli obravnava primernost izbire pravnega instrumenta, ki ga je treba sprejeti (uredba, direktiva ali sklep) in/ali oceni, ali ni morda bolj zaželena uporaba alternativnih metod urejanja;
Strongly reaffirms that better regulation must always imply the full involvement of Parliament both in the inter-institutional debate and, as a co-legislator, in the adoption of legislation subject to such a process; also stresses that it is always open to Parliament to consider the appropriateness of the choice of legal instrument to be adopted (regulation, directive or decision) and/or to assess whether it may be preferable to use alternative regulatory methods;
meni, da nova pravila o komitologiji, ki krepijo spremljanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije s strani Parlamenta in Sveta, pomenijo dodaten način za poenostavitev zakonodaje Skupnosti, ker dopuščajo prenos številnih zakonodajnih pooblastil v zvezi z nepomembnimi in tehničnimi podrobnostmi na Komisijo ter Parlamentu in Svetu dovoljujejo, da svojo zakonodajno dejavnost osredotočita na pomembnejše določbe;
Considers that the new rules on comitology, which reinforce the scrutiny by Parliament and the Council of the implementing powers conferred on the Commission, constitute a further way of simplifying Community legislation, inasmuch as they allow wide-ranging regulatory powers to be transferred to the Commission as regards non-essential and technical details and thus permit Parliament and the Council to concentrate their legislative activity on more essential provisions;
pozdravlja zaključke Evropskega sveta spomladi 2007 o boljši pravni ureditvi in še zlasti sklep o tem, da se do leta 2012 za 25 % zmanjšajo upravne obremenitve malih in srednjih podjetij, ki nastajajo zaradi zakonodaje Skupnosti; meni, da bi s tem ciljem morali doseči pametnejšo, učinkovitejšo in bolj uporabniku dostopno zakonodajo, ki bi zmanjšala nepotrebna bremena malih in srednjih podjetij ter pri tem ohranila raven meril veljavne zakonodaje; še posebej podpira sklep Sveta o pozivu držav članic k oblikovanju nacionalnih ciljev do leta 2008 in poziva, da Komisija in države članice določijo enotne mehanizme spremljanja, da se omogoči učinkovito izvajanje tega procesa v državah članicah na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Welcomes the conclusions of the European Council of Spring 2007 on better regulation and, in particular, the decision to reduce administrative burdens arising from Community legislation by 25 % for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) by 2012; considers that this target should result in more intelligent, more effective and more user-oriented legislation, reducing unnecessary burdens on SMEs without lowering the standards contained in the current legislation; supports, in particular, the decision of the Council to invite Member States to set national targets by 2008, and asks that the Commission and the Member States establish homogeneous monitoring mechanisms enabling this process to be effectively pursued in Member States at national, regional and local levels;
poziva Komisijo, da letno predstavi svoje dosežke in načrte za doseganje obljubljenih ciljev zmanjšanja upravne obremenitve;
Calls upon the Commission to present annually its achievements and its plans for the attainment of promised goals of reducing the administrative burden;
poziva Komisijo, da v sodelovanju s Svetom in Evropskim parlamentom razvije institucionalno reformo znotraj Skupnosti, ki bo pomagala zagotoviti večje finančne prihranke in olajšala sodelovanje z zagotavljanjem boljše in pametnejše zakonodaje;
Calls on the Commission to develop, in cooperation with the Council and the European Parliament, institutional reforms within the Community that will help to secure greater financial savings and will facilitate cooperation in ensuring better or more intelligent regulation;
je zaskrbljen nad ugotovitvami različnih neodvisnih študij Inštitut za evropsko okoljsko politiko (2004): Trajnostni razvoj v integrirani presoji vpliva Evropske komisije za leto 2003.
Is concerned by the findings of various independent studies Institute for European Environment Policy (2004): Sustainable Development in the European Commission's Integrated Impact Assessments for 2003.
Evropski svetovalni svet za okolje in trajnostni razvoj (2006): Presoje vpliva politik Evropske komisije: Dosežki in obeti.
European Environment and Sustainable Development Advisory Council (2006): Impact Assessments of European Commission Policies: Achievements and Prospects.
, ki kažejo, da generalni direktorati Komisije ne upoštevajo v celoti smernic Komisije za oceno učinka, da sta ocena in količinska opredelitev gospodarskega vpliva poudarjena na račun okoljskega, socialnega in mednarodnega vpliva, da se ocena stroškov zakonodaje upošteva veliko bolj kot ocena koristi ter da kratkoročni preudarki zasenčijo dolgoročne; pozdravlja načrte Komisije, da ustanovi odbor za oceno učinka in vzpostavi zunanjo presojo sistema Komisije za oceno učinka, kar naj bi prispevalo k zagotavljanju, da se odpravijo navedene stalne pomanjkljivosti;
that the Commission guidelines on impact assessments are not fully respected by Commission DGs, that the assessment and quantification of economic impacts have been emphasised at the expense of environmental, social and international impacts, that the costs of legislation are assessed far more than the benefits, and that short-term considerations overshadow long-term ones; welcomes the Commission's plans to set up an Impact Assessment Board and to establish external evaluation of the Commission's impact assessment system, both of which should contribute to ensuring that the persistent deficiencies listed above are finally overcome;
podpira zaključke študije o poenostavitvi okoljske politike EU, ki potrjuje, da so lahko ocene učinka ključnega pomena pri zagotavljanju boljše pravne ureditve in da je treba kakovost nekaterih teh presoj izboljšati; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi:
Supports the conclusion resulting from the study entitled "Simplifying EU Environmental Policy" that impact assessments can play an essential role in ensuring better regulation and that the quality of some assessments needs to be improved; urges the Commission to ensure:
da je za pripravo teh presoj na voljo dovolj časa in finančnih virov;
that adequate time and financial resources are allocated for these assessments;
da vsaka ocena učinka enako upošteva gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike, tako kratkoročno kot dolgoročno;
that impact assessments consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing, in both the short term and the longer term;
da ocene učinka ne upoštevajo zgolj stroškov ukrepov, ampak tudi stroške, ki nastanejo pri neobravnavanju vprašanj v zvezi z okoljem, javnim zdravjem in hrano;
that impact assessments consider not only the costs of measures but also the costs of not addressing the environmental, public health or food issues;
preglednost in vlaganje vseh zadevnih zainteresiranih strani;
transparency and input of all relevant stakeholders;
da so ocene učinka dovolj obsežne in upoštevajo različne nacionalne okoliščine v državah članicah;
that the impact assessments are broad enough in scope and that they take into account the different national circumstances in the Member States;
se zaveda, da bi lahko ocene učinka imele ključno vlogo pri predlogih sprememb Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta in k tem morebitno bistveno prispevale;
recognises that impact assessments could also play an essential role in the case of amendments proposed by the European Parliament or the Council having potentially significant impacts;
poziva Komisijo, da v državah članicah dodatno spodbuja izmenjavo informacij o najboljših praksah za poenostavitev okoljske politike EU, kot so:
Calls on the Commission to further promote exchanges of information on best practices regarding simplification of EU environmental policy in the Member States, such as:
uporaba informacijske tehnologije za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve;
the use of information technology to reduce the administrative burden;
poenostavitev in povezovanje sistemov za izdajanje dovoljenj in licenc, pri tem pa ohranjati okoljske in zdravstvene standarde;
the simplification and integration of permit schemes and licensing, while safeguarding environmental and health standards;
poenostavitev in integracija zahtev glede spremljanja in poročanja, vključno s pristopom na podlagi tveganja, hkrati pa ohranjanje preglednosti ter učinkovite uporabe in dejanskega izvrševanja predpisov;
the simplification and integration of the monitoring and reporting requirements, including the risk-based approach, while safeguarding transparency and effective implementation and enforcement;
poziva države članice, da med zakonodajnim postopkom oblikujejo in izvajajo mehanizme posvetovanja z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, upoštevajo njihovo zaskrbljenost med ministrskimi pogajanji ter okrepijo njihovo vlogo v postopku prenosa in izvajanja zakonodaje EU;
Calls upon the Member States to develop and to implement consultation mechanisms with the regional and local authorities during the legislative process, to take into account their concerns during ministerial negotiations and to reinforce their role during the process of transposition and implementation of EU legislation;
poziva Komisijo, naj tesno sodeluje z vsemi organi v državah članicah, ki so odgovorni za prenos zakonodaje EU, ter hkrati svetuje Komisiji, da tudi na lokalni ravni organizira seminarje o prenosu zakonodaje EU v domačo zakonodajo ter s tem zagotovi, da zainteresirane strani neposredno prejmejo zadevne informacije prek preprostih in razumljivih sredstev;
Calls upon the Commission to work closely with all authorities in the Member States that are responsible for the transposition of EU legislation, and at the same time advises the Commission to organise seminars at local level too on the subject of the transposition of EU legislation into domestic law, so as to ensure that, by simple, comprehensible means, relevant information reaches stakeholders directly;
poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo in uveljavijo nujne, učinkovite in jasne postopke za boljše sodelovanje med regionalnimi in centralnimi vladami, da se poenostavi postopek prenosa in prizna vse večja vloga regij z zakonskimi pristojnostmi;
Calls upon the Member States to develop and to enforce necessary, efficient and clear procedures for better cooperation between the regional and central governments in order to facilitate the transposition process, and to recognise the increasing role of regions having legislative powers;
spodbuja organe v državah članicah, da pripravijo formalne strategije za prenos, da se jasno določijo vloge in odgovornosti regionalnih in nacionalnih vlad za boljši in hitrejši prenos;
Encourages authorities in the Member States to draw up formal transposition strategies, in order to clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the regional and national governments for better and faster transposition;
spodbuja Komisijo, da smernice o prenosu za direktive objavi, kjer je to mogoče, hkrati z direktivami samimi, da nacionalnim in regionalnim vladam omogoči, da jih upoštevajo, preden začnejo s postopkom prenosa, in omogoči pravilen in pravočasen prenos v državah članicah;
Encourages the Commission to publish, where possible, the transposition guidelines for directives at the same time as the directives themselves, in order to allow national and regional governments to take them into account before starting the transposition process and to permit correct and timely transposition in the Member States;
poziva Komisijo, da pospeši dokončanje obsežne in prosto dostopne javne zbirke podatkov o nacionalnih izvedbenih zakonih, vključno z regionalnimi različicami, kadar je to primerno;
Calls upon the Commission to speed up the completion of a comprehensive, freely accessible public database of national implementing laws, including regional variations where appropriate;
meni, da boljša pravna ureditev ne sme povzročiti znižanja okoljskih in socialnih standardov ter standardov kakovosti;
Takes the view that better regulation should not lead to a reduction in environmental, social and quality standards;
poziva države članice, da zagotovijo, da se pri prenosu zakonodaje EU fizičnim in pravnim osebam ne naložijo obveznosti, ki presegajo to, kar zahteva prenesena zakonodaja, in ne nalagajo nepotrebne upravne obremenitve predvsem malim in srednjim podjetjem, ki so gonilna sila trajnostnega razvoja evropskih regij;
Calls upon the Member States to ensure that, when transposing EU legislation, they do not impose upon natural and legal persons obligations which go beyond what is required under the transposed legislation and which place an unnecessary administrative burden upon, in particular, SMEs, which are the driving force behind the sustainable development of Europe's regions;