natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(12a) To začasno povečanje deleža sofinanciranja bi bilo treba obravnavati tudi glede na proračunske omejitve, s katerimi se soočajo vse države članice, te omejitve pa bi se morale ustrezno odražati tudi v proračunu Unije.
(12a) This temporary increase in co-financing rates should also be considered in the context of the budgetary restraints facing all Member States and those budgetary restraints should be reflected appropriately in the Union budget.
Poleg tega bi morala biti njegova uporaba časovno omejena na odhodke plačilnih agencij do 31. decembra 2013, saj je glavni namen tega mehanizma reševati specifične tekoče težave.
In addition, since the main purpose of the mechanism is to address specific current difficulties, its application should be limited to expenditure incurred by the paying agencies until 31 December 2013;
Sprememba na predlog Sveta.
Modification suggested by Council.
(13a) Zaradi nujnosti reševanja gospodarske krize bi morala ta uredba začeti veljati takoj po objavi.
(13a) Due to the urgent need to address the economic crisis, this Regulation should enter into force immediately on publication;
Sprememba na predlog direktorata za zakonodajne akte.
Modification suggested by the Directorate for Legislative Acts.
Člen 70 – odstavek 4c – pododstavek 1
Article 70 – Paragraph 4c – Subparagraph 1
Ne glede na zgornje meje, določene v odstavku 3, 4 in 5 se lahko prispevek EKSRP poveča na največ 95 % upravičenih javnih odhodkov v regijah, upravičenih po konvergenčnem cilju, v najbolj oddaljenih regijah in za manjše Egejske otoke ter na 85 % upravičenih javnih odhodkov v drugih regijah.
By way of derogation from the ceilings set out in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5, the EAFRD contribution may be increased up to a maximum of 95% of eligible public expenditure in the regions eligible under the Convergence objective and the outermost regions and the smaller Aegean Islands, and 85% of eligible public expenditure in other regions.
Ti deleži se nanašajo na upravičene odhodke, ki bodo na novo prijavljeni v posameznih potrjenih izjavah o odhodkih, predloženih v obdobju, v katerem država članica izpolnjuje enega od naslednjih pogojev:
These rates shall apply to the eligible expenditure newly declared in each certified declaration of expenditure submitted during the period in which a Member State complies with one of the following conditions:
Ti deleži se nanašajo na upravičene odhodke, ki bodo na novo prijavljeni v posameznih potrjenih izjavah o odhodkih, nastalih v obdobju, v katerem država članica izpolnjuje enega od naslednjih pogojev:
These rates shall apply to the eligible expenditure newly declared in each certified declaration of expenditure incurred during the period in which a Member State complies with one of the following conditions:
Sprememba na predlog Sveta.
Modification suggested by the Council.
Člen 70 – odstavek 4c – pododstavek 2
Article 70 – Paragraph 4c – Subparagraph 2
Država članica, ki želi uporabiti odstopanje, predvideno v prvem pododstavku, pri Komisiji vnaprej predloži zahtevo za ustrezno spremembo programa razvoja podeželja.
A Member State wishing to make use of the derogation provided in the first subparagraph shall submit a request to the Commission to modify its rural development programme accordingly.
Odstopanje se uporablja, ko Komisija potrdi spremembe programa, in preneha veljati, ko država članica ne izpolnjuje več pogojev iz točk (a), (b) ali (c) prvega pododstavka.
The derogation shall apply as of the approval, by the Commission, of the modification of the programme, and shall cease to apply once the Member State does no longer meet in any of the conditions set out in points (a), (b) or (c) of the first subparagraph.
Država članica nato Komisiji pošlje predlog za spremembe programa, vključno z novimi finančnimi načrti, skladno z največjim deležem, ki je bil v uporabi pred odstopanjem.
The Member State shall then send the Commission a proposal for modification of the programme including a new financing plan in conformity with the maximum rates applicable before the derogation.
Odstopanje iz prvega pododstavka v vsakem primeru velja le za odhodke, ki so jih imele plačilne agencije do 31. decembra 2013.
In any event, the derogation provided for in the first subparagraph shall only apply to expenditure incurred by the paying agencies until 31 December 2013.
Člen 70 – odstavek 4c – pododstavek 3
Article 70 – Paragraph 4c – Subparagraph 3
Če država članica Komisiji do predvidenega datuma ne predloži predloga za spremembo programa za razvoj podeželja, vključno z novimi finančnimi načrti, ne izpolnjuje več pogojev iz točk (a), (b) ali (c) prvega pododstavka tega odstavka ali če spremenjeni finančni načrt ni v skladu z največjim deležem iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5 tega člena, navedeni deleži samodejno postanejo primerni za uporabo od navedenega datuma.
If a Member State does not submit to the Commission a proposal for modifying its rural development programme, including a new financing plan on the date it does no longer meet any of the conditions set out in points (a), (b) or (c) of the first subparagraph of this paragraph , or if the financing plan notified is not in conformity with the maximum rates laid down in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of this Article, those rates shall become automatically applicable as from that date.
Če država članica Komisiji do predvidenega datuma ne predloži predloga za spremembo programa za razvoj podeželja, vključno z novimi finančnimi načrti, odstopanje preneha veljati v skladu z drugim pododstavkom ali če spremenjeni finančni načrt ni v skladu z največjim deležem iz odstavkov 3, 4 in 5 tega člena, navedeni deleži samodejno postanejo primerni za uporabo od navedenega datuma.
If a Member State does not submit to the Commission a proposal for modifying its rural development programme, including a new financing plan , on the date that the derogation ceases to apply in accordance with the second subparagraph, or if the financing plan notified is not in conformity with the maximum rates laid down in paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of this Article, those rates shall become automatically applicable as from that date.
Nekatere države članice se zaradi finančne in proračunske krize soočajo s proračunskimi omejitvami, zato morda ne bodo mogle izpolniti svojih obveznosti v programih, ki jih sofinancira Unija (strukturni in kohezijski skladi, Evropski sklad za razvoj podeželja in Evropski sklad za ribištvo).
As a consequence of the financial and budgetary crisis, some Member States are facing budgetary constraints which might prevent them from fulfilling their commitments in co-financed community programs (Structural and Cohesion funds, EARDF and European Fisheries Fund).
Te države članice lahko izgubijo podporo Unije iz Evropskega sklada za razvoj podeželja, če najpozneje dve leti po letu prvotno predvidenega plačila (pravilo n+2) ne zagotovijo dokazila, da so namenile ustrezno visoka nacionalna sredstva, kot je določeno v členu 70 Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005.
These Member States are at the risk of losing the Community support through EARDF, unless they provide proof of spending matching national funds as defined in Article 70 of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, at the latest 2 years after the year initially foreseen for the payment (n+2 rule).
Na podlagi tega Komisija predlaga začasno povišanje najvišje stopnje, po kateri Unija sofinancira te programe v državah članicah, ki prejemajo podporo iz Evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo (EFSM) (Uredba Sveta (EU) št. 407/2010, zaenkrat so med temi državami Grčija, Irska in Portugalska) in plačilnobilančnega instrumenta za države članice, ki niso v evroobmočju (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002, zaenkrat Latvija in Romunija).
Against this background, the Commission proposes to temporarily increase the maximum Union’s co-financing rate for programmes running in Member States that are subject to support of the EFSM (Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010, currently Greece, Ireland and Portugal) and the “Balance of payment facility for non-Euro zone Member States (Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002, currently Latvia and Romania).
Z začasnim povečanjem sofinanciranja Unije, ki se zagotovi na podlagi prošnje zadevne države članice, bi se zmanjšal znesek ustreznih nacionalnih sredstev, ki so potrebna v proračunskih letih 2011 in 2012.
This temporary increase in community co-financing, provided on application of the Member State concerned, would reduce the amount of matching national funds needed in Budget years 2011 and 2012.
Sedanja najvišja stopnja sofinanciranja EU
EU co-financing
Predlagane najvišje stopnje sofinanciranja
Max. co-financing rates proposed
Regije, upravičene na podlagi konvergenčnega cilja
Regions eligible under the Convergence objective
Osi 1 in 3
Axis 1 and 3
Osi 2 in 4
Axis 2 and 4
Ukrepi na podlagi člena 16a (pregled)
Measures under Article 16 a (Health check)
Druge regije
Other regions
Najbolj oddaljene regije/Egejski otoki
Outermost regions / Aegean islands
Zato ne moremo izključiti tveganja, da se na splošno zmanjša celokupni načrtovani znesek.
Therefore a certain risk of an overall reduction of the total amount programmed cannot be excluded.
Vendar je to tveganje zanemarljivo v primerjavi s tveganjem, da bi zaradi primanjkovanja nacionalnih sredstev izgubili vsa evropska plačila v proračunih za leto 2011 in 2012
Nevertheless, this risk seems to be negligible compared to the risk of losing European payments altogether in Budget years 2011 and 2012, due to missing national funds
V pomoč je lahko obravnava fiktivnega primera:
It might be helpful to reflect on an imaginary example:
Komisija bi državi članici, ki je upravičencem izplačala 100 milijonov EUR, v skladu s sedanjo zakonodajo nadomestila znesek v višini 75 milijonov EUR (stopnja sofinanciranja 75 %).
Under the current regulation , a Member State, that has paid 100 m€ to beneficiaries, would be reimbursed by the Commission to a total amount of 75 m€ (co-funding rate of 75 %).
V skladu s predlagano spremembo pa bi ta država članica prejela nadomestilo v višini 95 milijonov EUR (v primeru konvergenčnih ali najbolj oddaljenih regij).
Under the proposed change , the same Member state would receive a reimbursement of 95 m€ (in Convergence or outermost regions).
Zato poročevalec v dobro gospodarstva na podeželju zadevnih držav članic in v širšem gospodarskem interesu predlaga, da se podpre predlog Komisije in pospeši zakonodajni postopek tako, da bo začel veljati pred koncem leta 2011.
The rapporteur suggests therefore, in the interest of rural economies in the Member States concerned and in the broader economic interest of the European Union as a whole, to support the Commission proposal and to accelerate the legislative procedure in a way that enables it to take effect before the end of 2011.
Sprememba Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 glede nekaterih določb o finančnem upravljanju za nekatere države članice, ki imajo resne težave ali obstaja nevarnost, da bi v tovrstne težave zašle v zvezi s svojo finančno stabilnostjo
Amendment of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Members States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability
Luís Paulo Alves, Salvatore Caronna, Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Giovanni La Via, Astrid Lulling, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Valdemar Tomaševski
Luís Paulo Alves, Salvatore Caronna, Spyros Danellis, Giovanni La Via, Astrid Lulling, Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Valdemar Tomaševski
o posodobitvi carine
on modernisation of customs
MNENJE Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ........................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on International Trade ......................................20
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 450/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. aprila 2008 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti (Modernizirani carinski zakonik)
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 450/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 laying down the Community Customs Code (Modernised Customs Code)
UL L 145, 4.6.2008, str.
OJ L 145, 4.6.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku
– having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993 o določbah za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti
– having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str.
OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p.
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 70/2008/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2008 o brezpapirnem okolju za carino in trgovino
– having regard to Decision No 70/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 on a paperless environment for customs and trade
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe št. 624/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o vzpostavitvi akcijskega programa za carino v Skupnosti (Carina 2013)
– having regard to Decision No 624/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing an action programme for customs in the Community (Customs 2013)
UL L 154, 14.6.2007, str.
OJ L 154, 14.6.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 648/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. aprila 2005 o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o Carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code
UL L 117, 4.5.2005, str.
OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta št. 2007/668/ES z dne 25. junija 2007 o izvrševanju pravic in obveznosti, podobnih začasnemu članstvu v Svetovni carinski organizaciji, s strani Evropske skupnosti
– having regard to Council Decision No 2007/668/EC of 25 June 2007 on the exercise of rights and obligations akin to membership ad interim by the European Community in the World Customs Organization
UL L 274, 18.10.2007, str.
OJ L 274, 18.10.2007, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pooblastitvi Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli) za nekatere naloge v zvezi z varstvom pravic intelektualne lastnine, vključno z organiziranjem srečanj predstavnikov javnega in zasebnega sektorja v okviru Evropskega opazovalnega urada za ponarejanje in piratstvo ( KOM(2011)0288 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on entrusting the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with certain tasks related to the protection of intellectual property rights, including the assembling of public and private sector representatives as a European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy ( COM(2011)0288 ),
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine s strani carinskih organov ( KOM(2011)0285 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights ( COM(2011)0285 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. maja 2011 o posebnih poročilih Evropskega računskega sodišča v okviru razrešnice Komisiji za leto 2009
– having regard to its resolution of 10 May 2011 on the Court of Auditors’ special reports in the context of the 2009 Commission discharge
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. marca 2011 o reviziji direktive o splošni varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga
– having regard to its resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0076 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0076 . ,
UL C 286 E, 27.11.2009, str.
OJ C 286 E, 27.11.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila svojega preiskovalnega odbora za tranzitni sistem Skupnosti (januar 1996–marec 1997),
– having regard to the report of its Committee of Inquiry into the Community Transit System (January 1996 – March 1997),
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča 1/2010: Ali se poenostavljeni carinski postopki za uvoz uspešno kontrolirajo?,
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special Report 1/2010: ‘Are simplified customs procedures for imports effectively controlled?’,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi državami Amerike o carinskem sodelovanju in medsebojni pomoči v carinskih zadevah
– having regard to the Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on customs cooperation and mutual assistance in customs matters
UL L 222, 12.8.1997, str.
OJ L 222, 12.8.1997, p.
17. , podpisanega 28. maja 1997,
17. , signed on 28 May 1997,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave o zanesljivosti dobavne verige (ministrstvo ZDA za domovinsko varnost in Evropska komisija), podpisane 23. junija 2011,
– having regard to the Joint Statement on Supply Chain Security (US Department of Homeland Security and European Commission), signed on 23 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine s strani carinskih organov EU – rezultati na mejah EU – 2010, Evropska komisija – davčna in carinska unija,
– having regard to the Report on the EU customs enforcement of intellectual property rights: Results at the EU border – 2010, European Commission – Taxation and Customs Union,
– - ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z naslovom „Vmesna ocena programa Carina 2013“ ( KOM(2011)0537 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission entitled ‘Midterm evaluation of the Customs 2013 programme’( COM(2011)0537 ),
– ob upoštevanja poročila Komisije „Končna ocena programa Carina 2007 v skladu s členom 19 Odločbe 253/2003/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. februarja 2003 o sprejetju akcijskega programa za carino v Skupnosti (Carina 2007)“ ( KOM(2008)0612 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission entitled ‘Final evaluation of the Customs 2007 programme in accordance with Article 19 of Decision 253/2003/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 February 2003 adopting an action programme for customs in the Community (Customs 2007)’ ( COM(2008)0612 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o strategiji za nadaljnji razvoj carinske unije ( KOM(2008)0169 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled ‘Strategy for the evolution of the Customs Union’ ( COM(2008)0169 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o odzivu carinskih organov na najnovejše trende v ponarejanju in piratstvu ( KOM(2005)0479 ),
– having regard to the communication from the Commission ‘on a Customs response to latest trends in counterfeiting and piracy’ ( COM(2005)0479 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila o napredku pri povečevanju varnosti letalskega tovora (dokument Sveta 11250/11),
– having regard to the progress report regarding strengthening air cargo security (Council document 11250/11),
– ob upoštevanju carinskega akcijskega načrta EU za boj proti kršitvam pravic intelektualne lastnine v letih 2009 do 2012 (dokument Sveta št. 5345/09),
– having regard to the EU Customs Action Plan to Combat IPR Infringements 2009-2012 (Council document 5345/09),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2009 o okrepljeni strategiji za carinsko sodelovanje
– having regard to the Council Resolution of 23 October 2009 on a reinforced strategy for customs cooperation
UL C 260, 30.10.2009, str.
OJ C 260, 30.10.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z zasedanja dne 14. maja 2008 o strategiji razvoja carinske unije,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 14 May 2008 on the strategy for the evolution of the Customs Union,
– ob upoštevanju predstavitve o posodobljeni carini in notranjem trgu dne 16. julija 2011,
– having regard to the hearing on ‘Modernised Customs and Internal Market’ held on 16 July 2011,
– ob upoštevanju študije, ki jo je naročil Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, z naslovom „Carinsko sodelovanje na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice: vloga carine pri upravljanju zunanjih meja EU“, ki je bila objavljena maja 2011,
– having regard to the study commissioned by its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs entitled ‘Customs Cooperation in the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice: the role of customs in the management of the external border of the EU’, published in May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenj Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0406/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on International Trade and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0406/2011 ),
A. ker je učinkovita carinska unija eden najpomembnejših temeljev evropskega procesa povezovanja in osnova za prosti pretok blaga, gospodarski razvoj ter rast na notranjem trgu;
A. whereas an efficient Customs Union is one of the essential cornerstones of the European integration process and a basis for the free movement of goods, economic development and growth in the internal market;
B. ker ima carina odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju varnosti in zaščite, varstvu potrošnikov in okolja, pripomore k celovitemu pobiranju dajatev, boju proti goljufijam in korupciji ter uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine;
B. whereas customs has a crucial role in guaranteeing safety and security, protecting consumers and the environment, ensuring complete revenue collection, strengthening the fight against fraud and corruption, and ensuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights;
C. ker lahko carina zaradi svojega priročnega položaja na meji učinkovito prispeva k zagotavljanju, da lahko v EU vstopa le varno blago;
C. whereas customs, being conveniently located at the border, can efficiently contribute to ensuring that only safe goods enter the EU;
D. ker ima carina še vedno pomembno vlogo pri varovanju finančnih interesov EU, čeprav se vloga pobiranja carinskih dajatev v zadnjih letih zmanjšuje;
D. whereas customs still play an important role in safeguarding the EU’s financial interests even though the role of collection of customs duties has been declining over recent years;
E. ker varnostni incidenti, ki so se zelo pred kratkim zgodili v letalskem tovornem prometu, dokazujejo, da je osredotočenost na varnost primerna in da morajo carinske uprave budno paziti na grožnje terorizma;
E. whereas very recent air cargo security incidents prove that the focus on security is appropriate and that customs administrations have to remain vigilant to threats of terrorism;
F. ker uvažanje ponarejenega in piratskega blaga v EU vodi v izgubo prihodkov in krši pravice intelektualne lastnine; ker lahko ponarejeni izdelki predstavljajo resno tveganje za varnost in zdravje evropskih potrošnikov;
F. whereas the importation into the EU of counterfeit and pirated goods leads to a loss in revenue and violates intellectual property rights; whereas counterfeit products can pose serious risks to the safety and health of European consumers;
G. ker se carina danes sooča z vse večjim obsegom uvoznih, izvoznih in tranzitnih transakcij, medtem ko ostajajo viri omejeni, zaradi česar je učinkovito obvladovanje tveganj še posebej pomembno;
G. whereas customs today face increasing volumes of import, export and transit transactions while resources remain limited, and efficient and effective risk management is therefore of particular importance;
H. ker je e-carina, zlasti centralizirano carinjenje, eden od glavnih vidikov posodabljanja in poenostavljanja carine;
H whereas e-customs, in particular centralised customs clearance, is one of the main aspects of customs modernisation and simplification;
I. ker je enostaven, gladko in dobro delujoč carinski sistem bistven za olajšanje mobilnosti blaga in trgovine na notranjem trgu, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja;
I. whereas a smooth, simple and well functioning customs system is essential to facilitate mobility of goods, and trade on the internal market, especially for SMEs;