natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je nedoslednost med nacionalnimi zakoni o prenosu finančnih instrumentov eden od glavnih razlogov, zakaj so stroški za čezmejne transakcije višji od stroškov za domače transakcije; podpira stalne poskuse za usklajevanje teh zakonov, a priznava, da bi za dokončanje tega projekta lahko potrebovali veliko let; pozdravlja ustanovitev Skupine za pravno varnost s strani Komisije; poziva Komisijo, da okrepi delo te skupine kot prednostnega instrumenta za spodbujanje približevanja na evropski ravni; poziva Komisijo, da upošteva rezultate tega dela in da tesno sodeluje s tretjimi državami in skupinami, kot sta Unidroit in Haaška konvencija z dne 13. decembra 2002 o pravu, ki se uporablja za določene pravice glede na jamstva s pomočjo posrednika, ter poziva Evropski parlament in države članice, da se v pravočasno povežejo in opredelijo evropski pogajalski položaj v tem okviru;
Believes that inconsistencies between national laws on transferring financial instruments are one of the main reasons why costs are higher for cross-border than for domestic transactions; supports ongoing attempts to harmonise these laws but acknowledges that this project could take many years to complete; welcomes the setting-up by the Commission of the Legal Certainty Group; urges the Commission to step up the work of that group as a priority instrument for promoting convergence at European level; calls on the Commission to act upon the results of this work and to cooperate closely with third countries and groups such as Unidroit and the Hague Convention of 13 December 2002 on the law applicable to certain rights in respect of securities held with an intermediary and calls for the European Parliament and the Member States to be associated in due course with defining the European negotiating position within this framework;
meni, da so davčne ovire razlog za visoke stroške čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave; podpira trenutna prizadevanja za zmanjšanje teh ovir; pozdravlja delovno skupino za davčne zadeve, ki jo je uvedla Komisija zato, da se začne izvajati proces koordinacije in harmonizacije davčnih zadev;
Believes that fiscal barriers are a reason for higher costs in cross-border clearing and settlement; supports ongoing attempts to reduce these barriers; welcomes the fiscal compliance experts' working group, introduced by the Commission with a view to launching a process of coordination and harmonisation in tax matters;
meni, da mora biti kratkoročno osredotočenje dela na davčne zadeve standardizacija zahtev za poročanje, ki mu mora slediti nadaljnja odstranitev diskriminatornih davčnih praks; meni, da če bi bilo možno davčnim organom po Evropi zagotoviti informacije o standardni obliki, bi to znatno zmanjšalo stroške obračuna in poravnave, ne da bi pri tem oslabili moč držav članic pri odločanju o svojih davkih;
Believes that the short-term focus of work on tax matters should be the standardisation of reporting requirements, to be followed by further removal of discriminatory tax practices; considers that if it were possible to provide information to tax authorities on a standard form throughout Europe, this would significantly reduce clearing and settlement costs, without undermining the power of Member States to decide their own taxes;
poziva Odbor evropskih regulativnih organov s področja vrednostnih papirjev (CESR), da jasno določi pravno osnovo svojih dejavnosti v zvezi z zadevami, ki jih ne ureja zakonodaja EU, in da v vsakem primeru tesno sodeluje z Evropskim parlamentom in ga izčrpno obvešča o svojih dejavnostih na stopnjah 3 in 4, zlasti o izrazito političnih vprašanjih strukturnih trgov, kot sta obračun in poravnava, in da odstrani obvezujočo naravo svojih standardov;
Urges the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) to clearly state the legal basis of its activities on subjects not mandated by EU legislation, and in any case to cooperate closely with the European Parliament and to keep it fully informed on its Level 3 and 4 activities, particularly on highly political issues related to market structures such as clearing and settlement, and to remove the binding character of its standards;
obžaluje, da se CESR in Evropski sistem centralnih bank (ESCB) nista bolj na široko in odprto posvetovala z zadevnimi udeleženci trga in drugimi evropskimi ustanovami; postavlja pod vprašaj uporabnosti koncepta CESR–ESCB, t.i. "pomembnega skrbnika", saj je dvoumen; meni, da morajo standardi CESR-ESCB zagotavljati, da ne prihaja do dvojne ureditve za institucije, za katere že veljajo predpisi o bančništvu;
Regrets that the CESR and the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) did not consult more widely and openly the market players concerned as well as other European institutions; questions the usefulness of the CESR-ESCB concept of a "significant custodian", as it is ambiguous; believes that the CESR-ESCB standards must ensure there is no double regulation for institutions already subject to banking regulation;
obžaluje, da je časovna razporeditev sprejetja standardov CESR-ESCB ravno v obdobju, ko se preučuje ukrepe na stopnji 1; ponovno potrjuje, da CESR standardi ne smejo vnaprej določati predpisov EU, bodisi zakonodajnih bodisi nezakonodajnih; poziva k celovitemu posvetovanju in preglednosti izvajanja standardov in meni, da mora biti to izvajanje odloženo najmanj do takrat, ko se bo Komisija odločila, ali bo predlagala direktivo; poudarja, da je v vsakem primeru, ne glede na prispevek CESR-ESCB, za zakonodajo na tem področju pristojen in odgovoren evropski zakonodajalec;
Regrets the timing of the adoption of CESR-ESCB standards during a period when Level 1 measures are under consideration; reaffirms that CESR standards must not pre-determine EU legislation, whether legislative or non-legislative; urges full consultation and transparency in the implementation of the standards and believes that implementation should be postponed at least until after the Commission has decided whether to propose a directive; points out that, in any case, whatever contribution is made by CESR-ESCB, the primary responsibility and competence for legislation in this sphere lies with the European legislator;
je zaskrbljen, da kljub odločitvi CESR, da preloži izvajanje standardov, nekateri urejevalci nadaljujejo in že zahtevajo njihovo izvajanje s strani udeležencev trga; zaskrbljen je tudi zaradi poročil, da CESR-ESCB ponovno oblikujeta standarde brez posvetovanja in za zaprtimi vrati;
Is concerned that, despite the CESR's decision to postpone implementation of the standards, some regulators are going ahead and are already requiring their implementation by market participants; is further concerned at reports that the standards are being redrafted by CESR-ESCB without consultation and behind closed doors;
meni, da je treba razviti, če ne bo predlagana nobena direktiva o obračunu in poravnavi, učinkovito alternativno obliko pregledovanja CESR, ki zagotavlja učinkovit parlamentarni pregled nad dejavnostmi na stopnji 3; poziva vse ustrezne ustanove in interesne skupine, da se vključijo v razpravo o tem, kako bi to lahko dosegli; beleži naslednje načine, na katere bi to lahko dosegli:
Believes that, if no directive is proposed on clearing and settlement, an effective alternative means of scrutinising CESR must be developed which ensures effective parliamentary oversight of Level 3 activities; calls on all relevant institutions and stakeholders to engage in a debate on how this might be achieved; notes the following ways in which this might be achieved:
zagotavljanje, da se Evropskemu parlamentu pošlje obvestilo o vseh pooblastilih, ki so jih poslali CESR, in tudi zagotavljanje, da CESR čim prej obvešča Evropski parlament o delu, izvedenem na stopnji 3, v zvezi s vsebinami, ki sprožajo občutljiva politična vprašanja;
ensuring that notification is sent to the European Parliament of all mandates sent to the CESR and also ensuring that the CESR keeps the European Parliament informed, at the earliest possible stage, of work carried out at Level 3 on subjects which raise sensitive political issues;
razvijanje in izboljšanje učinkovitosti parlamentarnih zaslišanj s predstavniki CESR s težavnimi vprašanji in navzkrižnim zasliševanjem;
developing and enhancing the effectiveness of parliamentary hearings with representatives of CESR, with tough questioning and cross-examination;
predložitev rednih pisnih poročil CESR Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve;
submission of regular written reports by the CESR to the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs;
meni, da definicije v zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu Komisije ne razlikujejo jasno med dejavnostmi različnih sektorjev na trgu in da jih je treba znatno izboljšati, če bo zakonodaja predlagana;
Believes that the definitions in the abovementioned Commission communication do not clearly distinguish between the activities of different sectors of the market and that they must be significantly improved if legislation is proposed;
priznava obsežne učinke in velike prednosti, ki lahko izhajajo iz dovoljene koncentracije; opozarja, da uporabniki storitev obračuna in poravnave že več let zahtevajo konsolidacijo in da je od sedanje konsolidacije, če bo ustrezno nadzirana, pričakovati, da bo prinesla nadaljnje koristi v prihodnosti; meni, da odsotnost primernega zakonskega in predpisanega okvira ne omogoča oblikovanja enakih konkurenčnih pogojev, potrebnih za spodbujanje vključevanja;
Recognises the benefits of scale and scope that can flow from allowing concentration; notes that users of clearing and settlement services have been calling for consolidation for many years and that recent consolidation, if properly controlled, is expected to yield further benefits in the near future; believes that the absence of an appropriate legislative and regulatory framework does not allow for a level playing field to be created, which is needed to foster integration;
poziva Komisijo, da na proaktiven način uporabi svoja splošna pooblastila po konkurenčnem pravu za zaščito pred kakršno koli zlorabo prevladujočega položaja ali pred drugo vrsto protikonkurenčnega obnašanja; opaža pomemben vpliv nedavnih primerov povezanih s konkurenco na tem področju; toda poudarja, da so ti primeri zadevali glavne udeležence z znatno pogajalsko močjo in da je treba nameniti posebno pozornost zagotovitvi, da imajo vsi sodelujoči dostop do ključnih pripomočkov brez diskriminacije;
Urges the Commission to use its general powers under competition law in a pro-active way to guard against any abuse of a dominant position or other anti-competitive behaviour; notes the significant impact of recent competition cases in this area; points out, however, that these cases concerned major players with significant negotiating power and that particular attention should be paid to ensuring that all participants have access to essential facilities without discrimination;
se strinja, da si nekateri deli industrije sistema obračuna in poravnave zaslužijo več pozornosti s stališča politike konkurence; priznava, da imajo določena podjetja velik delež na trgu storitev obračuna in poravnave, kar bi lahko oslabilo nemoteno delovanje trga; meni, da so stranke prizadete le, ko je zlorabljen prevladujoč položaj, zato je upravičeno posredovanje iz razloga javnega reda;
Agrees that some parts of the clearing and settlement system industry deserve more careful attention from a competition policy perspective; recognises that certain firms have a large share of the market for clearing and settlement services and this may weaken the smooth functioning of the market; considers that it is only where a dominant position is abused that customers suffer and public policy intervention is justified;
opozarja Komisijo pred zmanjšanjem vrednosti konkurenčnega prava; poziva Komisijo, da na proaktiven način uporabi svoja pooblastila za zaščito konkurence za zaščito pred kakršno koli zlorabo prevladujočega položaja ali pred drugo vrsto protikonkurenčnega obnašanja, zlasti glede preglednosti cenovnih struktur; poziva Komisijo, da:
Cautions the Commission against any dilution of competition law; urges the Commission to use its powers to safeguard competition in a pro-active way so as to guard against any abuse of a dominant position or other anti-competitive behaviour, in particular with regard to transparency of pricing structures; urges the Commission to:
zagotovi enak in pravičen dostop za vse uporabnike;
ensure that there is equal and fair access for all users;
preuči, obstoj navzkrižnega subvencioniranja med bistvenimi storitvami in storitvami z dodano vrednostjo; in
examine the existence of cross-subsidisation between core and value-added services; and
zagotovi primerno obnašanje udeležencev z vodilnimi položaji na trgu, kot je predvideno v členu 82 Pogodbe ES;
ensure appropriate behaviour by players with dominant market positions as provided by Article 82 of the EC Treaty;
opaža pomemben vpliv nedavnih primerov v zvezi s konkurenco na tem področju;
notes the impact of recent competition cases in this area;
meni, da so pravice učinkovitega in preglednega nediskriminatorega dostopa do storitev obračuna in poravnave pomembne pri zagotavljanju konkurenčnega integriranega finančnega trga v EU; priporoča uporabo možnosti proaktivnega izvrševanja Direktive 2004/39/ES, skupaj s previdno uporabo splošnih pooblastil Komisije glede konkurence za zagotovitev, da omejitve dostopa ne bodo zlorabljene v protikonkurenčne namene;
Believes that effective and transparent non-discriminatory access rights to clearing and settlement services are important in ensuring a competitive integrated financial market in the EU; recommends using the possibility of pro-active enforcement of Directive 2004/39/EC, along with vigilant use of the Commission's general competition powers, to ensure access restrictions are not abused for anti-competitive reasons;
dopušča, da bi lahko bil dostop zavrnjen, če ne bi bil tehnično izvedljiv ali poslovno sposoben in varen zaradi objektivnih ali preglednih razlogov; poziva Komisijo, da uporabi svoja splošna pooblastila glede konkurenčnega prava za zagotovitev, da omejitve dostopa ne bodo zlorabljene v protikonkurenčne namene;
Accepts that access may be refused where it would not be technically feasible or commercially viable or prudentially safe for objective and transparent reasons; urges the Commission to use its general competition law powers to ensure access restrictions are not abused for anti-competitive reasons;
podpira presojo vplivov, ki jo trenutno izvaja Komisija, za ocenitev potrebe po zakonodajnih ukrepih; podpira zamisli Komisije o preglednosti cenovnih struktur; ugotavlja, da lahko pride do težav s primerljivostjo, če je več sestavin stroškov pogosto združenih v enotno tarifno sestavino; se sprašuje o potrebnosti ločevanja na "bistvene" dejavnosti obračuna in poravnave ter tako imenovane storitve "z dodano vrednostjo", z namenom obravnavanja upravičenih vprašanj glede svobodne konkurence, nediskriminatornega dostopa in ublažitve tveganja; pričakuje, da bodo predlogi Komisije s tega področja sorazmerni s težavami, ugotovljenimi na trgu;
Supports the ongoing impact assessment which the Commission is undertaking to assess the need for legislative measures; supports the Commission's ideas regarding the transparency of pricing structures; notes that comparability difficulties can arise if several cost components are combined together in a single tariff component; questions whether it is necessary to separate "core" clearing and settlement activities and so-called "value-added" services in order to address legitimate questions regarding free competition, non-discriminatory access and risk mitigation; expects potential proposals of the Commission in this area to be proportionate to problems identified in the market;
izraža zaskrbljenost glede vprašanja, ali bi morale storitve po trgovanju spadati pod kategorijo storitev splošnega interesa; poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da za vse udeležence, ki ponujajo enako storitev, veljajo enaka pravila;
Expresses concern over the issue of whether post-trade services should come under the category of services of general interest; urges the Commission to ensure that all players providing the same service are regulated in the same manner;
verjame, da morajo osrednji ponudniki obračuna in poravnave povsem upoštevati interese vseh uporabnikov, čim bolj razširiti posvetovanje z uporabniki in preglednost cenovnih struktur ter zagotoviti, da ne bo prihajalo do navzkrižnega subvencioniranja med njihovimi osrednjimi storitvami in tistimi, ki so na voljo v konkurenci z drugimi udeleženci na trgu, zlasti depozitnimi bankami, kot se to že dogaja v drugih industrijah; meni, da morajo uporabniki plačati le za storitve, ki jih uporabljajo, ter imeti jasno in svobodno izbiro glede tega, kje kupiti bančne storitve v zvezi z njihovo transakcijo; meni, da morajo sistemi poravnave vrednostnih papirjev, ki se poravnavajo v denarju poslovnih bank, ponujati izbiro poravnave v denarju centralne banke;
Believes that central providers of clearing and settlement services should take full account of the interests of all users, maximise user consultation and transparency of pricing structures and ensure zero cross-subsidy between their central services and those offered in competition with other market participants, especially custodian banks, as is already the case in other industries; believes that users should pay only for the services they consume and have a clear and unfettered choice about where to purchase banking services related to their transactions; considers that securities settlement systems settling in commercial bank money should offer at least a choice as to whether to settle in central bank money;
B6-0443 , 0445 , 0447 in 0448/2005
B6-0443 , 0445 , 0447 and 0448/2005
ob upoštevanju pristopne pogodbe za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, podpisane 25. aprila 2005,
having regard to the accession treaty for Bulgaria and Romania signed on 25 April 2005,
ob upoštevanju napredka Bolgarije in Romunije, ki je omogočil zaključek pristopnih pogajanj, in ob upoštevanju potrebe po nadaljevanju prizadevanj, tako pred kot po podpisu pristopne pogodbe, za odpravo pomanjkljivosti, opredeljenih v poročilu Komisije o napredku za leto 2004 in v zadnjih resolucijah Evropskega parlamenta,
having regard to the progress achieved by Bulgaria and Romania which made it possible to conclude the accession negotiations, but also to the need to continue the efforts to remedy the shortcomings identified in the Commission's 2004 progress report and in Parliament's most recent resolutions both before and after signature of the accession treaty,
ob upoštevanju izmenjave pisem med predsednikom Evropskega parlamenta in predsednikom Komisije o polni vključenosti Evropskega parlamenta v kakršno koli odločanje o uporabi ene od zaščitnih klavzul iz pristopne pogodbe,
having regard to the exchange of letters between the President of Parliament and the President of the Commission on the full involvement of Parliament in any decision to apply any of the safeguard clauses in the accession treaty,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se bo pravni red Skupnosti med pripravami na pristop Bolgarije in Romunije k Evropski uniji, predviden 1. januar 2007 ali 1. januar 2008, še naprej razvijal in spreminjal, če bodo uporabljene zaščitne klavzule iz pristopne pogodbe;
having regard to the fact that the acquis continues to develop and be modified in the run-up to the Bulgarian and Romanian accession to the European Union, scheduled for 1 January 2007, or 1 January 2008 should the safeguard clauses in the accession treaty be invoked,
še enkrat poudarja, da bo še naprej natančno spremljal proces, ki bo pripeljal do pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije in poziva Komisijo, da ga redno obvešča, v kolikšni meri bolgarski in romunski organi spoštujejo obveznosti, prevzete s pristopno pogodbo; poudarja, da je bilo njegovo soglasje k pristopnima pogodbama dano pod pogojem, da bosta Svet in Komisija v celoti vključila Parlament v odločanje v primeru uporabe zaščitnih klavzul iz pristopne pogodbe v zvezi s pristopom Bolgarije in Romunije;
Stresses once again that it will continue to follow closely the process which will lead to Bulgaria's and Romania's accession, and calls on the Commission to keep it regularly informed of the extent to which the Bulgarian and Romanian authorities honour the commitments made in the accession treaty; stresses that its approval of the accession treaties was given on condition that the Council and Commission fully involve Parliament in decision-making in the event of the safeguard clauses in the accession treaty being used in the context of Bulgaria's and Romania's accession;
poudarja, da je Evropski parlament sprejel parlamentarne opazovalce iz 10 novih držav članic za celotno obdobje od podpisa pristopne pogodbe do formalnega pristopa k uniji;
Emphasises that the European Parliament welcomed parliamentary observers from the ten new Member States for the whole period from the signing of the accession treaty to their actual and formal accession to the Union;
poudarja, da kljub temu, da je bila prisotnost opazovalcev v smislu dejanskega vpliva omejena, ta ureditev demokratično izvoljenim parlamentarcem iz držav pristopnic ni omogočila zgolj seznanitve s postopki Evropskega parlamenta, ampak tudi pozorno spremljanje dejanskega sprejemanja zakonodaje Skupnosti, o kateri ni uradnih pogajanj;
Points out that, although the presence of the observers was limited and restricted in terms of real influence, this arrangement made it possible for democratically elected parliamentarians from the accession countries not only to familiarise themselves with European Parliament proceedings, but also to closely follow the actual adoption of Community legislation;
poudarja, da lahko prihod opazovalcev iz bolgarskega in romunskega parlamenta, kot je sklenila konferenca predsednikov, prispeva k nadaljevanju priprav na uspešen pristop k Evropski uniji, še zlasti pa zagotovi izpolnitev obljub, danih med pogajanji;
Stresses that the arrival of the observers from the Bulgarian and Romanian Parliaments, as decided by the Conference of Presidents, may contribute to the further preparation of a successful accession to the European Union, and in particular to ensuring that the commitments made during the negotiations are being met;
zato podpira nedavno odločitev konference predsednikov z dne 9. junija 2005, da povabi parlamenta Bolgarije in Romunije k imenovanju parlamentarnih opazovalcev in jih pričakuje od 26. septembra 2005 dalje, vse do formalnega pristopa teh dveh držav;
Endorses, therefore, the recent decision by the Conference of Presidents, taken on 9 June 2005, to invite the Parliaments of Bulgaria and Romania to nominate parliamentary observers and to welcome them from 26 September 2005 until the formal accession of their respective countries;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladama in parlamentoma Bolgarije in Romunije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and the Governments and Parliaments of Bulgaria and Romania.
B6-0416 , 0430 , 0432 , 0439 in 0442/2005
B6-0416 , 0430 , 0432 , 0439 and 0442/2005
ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o razmerah v Zimbabveju, nazadnje z dne 16. decembra 2004 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2004)0112 .
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Zimbabwe, including most recently that of 16 December 2004 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2004)0112 .
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta 2005/146/SZVP z dne 21. februarja 2005 o podaljšanju veljavnosti Skupnega stališča 2004/161/SZVP o obnovitvi sankcij proti Zimbabveju UL L 49, 22.2.2005, str.
having regard to Council Common Position 2005/146/CFSP of 21 February 2005 extending Common Position 2004/161/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Zimbabwe OJ L 49, 22.2.2005, p.
ter Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 898/2005 z dne 15. junija 2005 o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 314/2004 o nekaterih omejevalnih ukrepih glede Zimbabveja UL L 153, 16.6.2005, str.
and Commission Regulation (EC) No 898/2005 of 15 June 2005 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe OJ L 153, 16.6.2005, p.