natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Glej tudi resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 4. septembra 2003 o razmerah v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami v Evropski uniji (2002), odstavek 22: „V splošnem meni, da si je treba prizadevati tudi na področju evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, da se izkoristijo evropske zmožnosti za izboljšanje policije in zaporskega sistema, na primer... s sestavo okvirnega sklepa o minimalnih standardih za varovanje pravic zaprtih oseb v EU“.
See also Parliament's resolution of 4 September 2003 on the situation as regards fundamental rights in the European Union (2002), paragraph 22: 'Considers, at a general level, that efforts must also be made in a European area of freedom, security and justice to mobilise European capacities to improve the operation of the police and prison system. for example ... by drawing up a framework decision on minimum standards to protect the rights of prisoners in the EU'.
in v priporočilo z dne 9. marca 2004 Svetu o pravicah zaprtih oseb v Evropski uniji Poročilo Maurizia Turca, priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o pravicah zaprtih oseb v Evropski uniji ( 2003/2188(INI) ), P5_TA(2004)0142 .
, in its recommendation of 9 March 2004 to the Council on the rights of prisoners in the European Union Report by Maurizio Turco, European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the rights of prisoners in the European Union ( 2003/2188(INI) ) , P5_TA(2004)0142 .
ter v resolucijo z dne 25. novembra 2009 o večletnem programu za obdobje 2010–2014 o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice (stockholmski program) P7_TA(2009)0090 : v odstavku 112 Parlament „poziva k vzpostavitvi območja kazenskega pravosodja EU, ki bo temeljilo na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, načelu vzajemnega priznavanja in potrebi po ohranitvi doslednosti nacionalnih kazenskopravnih sistemov, razvije pa se z ukrepi za določitev minimalnih standardov glede pogojev v zaporih in priporu ter skupen niz pravic zapornikov v EU,...“
and in its resolution of 25 November 2009 on the multi-annual programme 2010-2014 regarding the area of freedom, security and justice (Stockholm Programme) P7_TA(2009)0090 : in paragraph 112 Parliament 'calls for the construction of an EU criminal justice area based on respect for fundamental rights, the principle of mutual recognition, and the need to maintain the coherence of national systems of criminal law, to be developed through...minimum standards for prison and detention conditions and a common set of prisoners’ rights in the EU...'.
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
– having regard to the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/909/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji UL L 327, 5.12.2008, str.
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 29. avgusta 2006 o evropskem nalogu za nadzor v predsodnih postopkih med državami članicami Evropske unije ( KOM(2006)0468 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council Framework Decision of 29 August 2006 on the European supervision order in pre-trial procedures between Member States of the European Union (COM(2006)468 final),
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravici do dostopa do odvetnika v kazenskem postopku in pravici do komunikacije v primeru prijetja ( COM(2011)0326 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and on the right to communicate upon arrest (COM(2011)326),
– ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 14. junija 2011 o izvajanju kazenskopravne zakonodaje EU na področju pripora – krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja na evropskem pravosodnem območju ( KOM(2011)0327 ),
– having regard to the Commission Green Paper on the application of EU criminal justice legislation in the field of detention - Strengthening mutual trust in the European judicial area - of 14 June 2011 (COM(2011) 327 final),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor o pogojih izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni, ki so jih vložile skupine ALDE, GUE/NGL, PPE, Verts/ALE in S&D,
– having regard to the Oral Questions on detention conditions in the EU tabled by the ALDE, GUE/NGL, PPE, Verts/ALE and S&D groups,
A. ker je Evropska unija sama sebi zadala nalogo, da razvije območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, in ker v skladu s členom 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji spoštuje človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine, s tem pa sprejema pozitive obveznosti, ki jih mora izpolnjevati, da bi spoštovala to zavezo;
A. whereas the European Union has set itself the task of developing an area of freedom, security and justice, and whereas, pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union, it respects human rights and fundamental freedoms, thereby taking on positive obligations which it must meet in order to honour that commitment;
B. ker so pogoji izvrševanja pripora in zaporne kazni ter upravljanje zaporov v glavnem pristojnost držav članic, vendar lahko ker pomanjkljivosti, kot so prezasedenost zaporov in trditve o slabem ravnanju z zaprtimi osebami, spodkopljejo zaupanje, na katerem mora temeljiti pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, ki temelji na načelu vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in sodnih odločitev držav članic EU;
B. whereas detention conditions and prison management are primarily the responsibility of Member States, but whereas shortcomings, such as prison overcrowding and allegations of poor treatment of detainees, may undermine the trust which must underpin judicial cooperation in criminal matters based on the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions by EU Member States;
C. ker mora pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah temeljiti na spoštovanju standardov na področju temeljnih pravic in na potrebnem približevanju pravic osumljencev in obtožencev ter postopkovnih pravic v kazenskih postopkih, kar je ključno za zagotovitev vzajemnega zaupanja med državami članicami na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice, zlasti glede na to, da se lahko število državljanov ene države članice, ki so zaprti v drugi državi članici, zaradi takega sodelovanja poveča;
C. whereas judicial cooperation in criminal matters needs to be based on respect for standards in the area of fundamental rights standards and the necessary approximation of the rights of suspects and accused persons and of procedural rights in criminal proceedings, which is crucial to ensuring mutual confidence among Member States in the area of freedom, security and justice, in particular given that the number of Member State nationals held in another Member State may rise as a result of such cooperation;
D. ker se ocenjuje, da skupna zaporska populacija v EU v obdobju 2009–2010 šteje 633 909 oseb Podatki, ki jih navaja Komisija v zeleni knjigi o priporu ( KOM(2011)0327 ); dodatni podatki so na voljo pri Svetu Evrope, Space1: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/cdpc/Bureau%20documents/PC-CP(2011)3%20E%20-%20SPACE%20I%202009.pdf ;
D. whereas the total prison population of the EU in 2009-2010 was estimated to be 633 909 Data reported by the Commission in its Green Paper on detention ( COM(2011)0327 final); further data available from the Council of Europe, Space 1: http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/cdpc/Bureau%20documents/PC-CP(2011)3%20E%20-%20SPACE%20I%202009.pdf ;
; ker zelena knjiga Komisije, ki vsebuje to oceno, daje zaskrbljujočo sliko o:
; whereas the Commission Green Paper which contains that figure paints an alarming picture of:
– prezasedenosti zaporov Povprečje v EU je 107,3; prezasedenost je težava v 13 državah članicah, pa tudi v Angliji, Walesu in na Škotskem; prezasedenost je najhujša v Bolgariji (155,6), Italiji 153), na Cipru (150,5), v Španiji (136,3) in v Grčiji(129,6).
- prison overcrowding In the EU the average is 107.3; overcrowding concerns 13 MSs, as well as in England and Wales and Scotland, with the highest overcrowding in Bulgaria (155.6), Italy (153), Cyprus (150.5), Spain (136.3) and Greece (129.6).
– povečanje zaporske populacije;
- an increase in the prison population;
– povečanju števila zaprtih tujih državljanov Povprečje v EU je 21,7; najvišje odstotke imajo Luksemburg (69,5), Ciper (59,6), Avstrija (45,8), Grčija (43,9) in Belgija (41,1).
- a rise in the number of foreign nationals being held EU average 21.7, with the highest percentages in Luxembourg (69.5), Cyprus (59.6), Austria (45.8), Greece (43.9) and Belgium (41.1).
– velikem številu pripornikov Povprečje v EU je 24,7; najvišje odstotke imajo Luksemburg (47,2), Italija (43,6) in Ciper (38,4).
- large numbers of pre-trial detainees EU average is 24.7, with the highest percentages in Luxembourg (47.2), Italy (43.6) and Cyprus (38.4).
– zaprtih osebah z mentalnimi ali psihološkimi motnjami;
- detainees with mental and psychological disorders;
– številnih smrtih in samomorih Poročilo odbora Sveta Evrope za preprečevanje mučenja in nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja ali kaznovanja opozarja na trdovratnost nekaterih resnih težav, kot so grdo ravnanje ter neprimernost zaporskih prostorov, dejavnosti in zdravstvene oskrbe.
- numerous cases of death and suicide CPT reports draw attention to the persistence of certain serious problems, such as ill-treatment and the unsuitability of prison facilities, activities and health care.
E. ker člen 3 EKČP in sodna praksa ESČP državam članicam ne nalagata le negativnih obveznosti, tako da prepovedujejo nečloveško in poniževalno ravnanje z zaprtimi osebami, temveč tudi pozitivne obveznosti, tako da jim nalagata, da zagotovijo razmere v zaporih, ki so skladne s človeškim dostojanstvom, ter da se v primeru kršitev opravijo temeljite in učinkovite preiskave;
E. whereas Article 3 of the ECHR and the case law of the ECtHR impose on the Member States not only negative obligations, by banning them from subjecting prisoners to inhuman and degrading treatment, but also positive obligations, by requiring them to ensure that prison conditions are consistent with human dignity and that thorough, effective investigations are carried out if such rights are violated;
F. ker v nekaterih državah članicah velik delež zaporske populacije sestavljajo osebe v priporu; ker je pripor izjemen ukrep in ker so izrazito dolga priporna obdobja za posameznike škodljiva, lahko škodijo pravosodnemu sodelovanju med državami članicami in nasprotujejo vrednotam EU Načrt za krepitev postopkovnih pravic osumljencev in obdolžencev v kazenskih postopkih, 2009/C295/01, 30. november 2009.
F. whereas in some Member States a large part of the prison population is composed of persons in pre-trial detention; whereas pre-trial detention is an exceptional measure and excessively long periods of pre-trial detention have a detrimental effect on the individual, can prejudice judicial cooperation between Member States and run counter to EU values Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected and accused persons in criminal proceedings, 2009/C295/01, 30 November 2009.
; ker je ESČP veliko število držav članic večkrat obsodilo zaradi kršitev EKČP v zvezi s priporom;
; whereas a considerable number of Member States have repeatedly been condemned by the ECtHR for violations of the ECHR in relation to pre-trial detention;
G. ker je ena od težav, na katere države članice pogosto opozarjajo, pomanjkanje sredstev, ki bi bila na razpolago za izboljšanje razmer v zaporih, in ker bo morda potrebno ustvariti novo proračunsko postavko, da se države članice spodbudijo, da spoštujejo visoke standarde;
G. whereas one of the problems to which Member States frequently draw attention is the lack of resources available to improve prisons conditions, and whereas it may be necessary to create a new budget heading with a view to encouraging them to comply with high standards;
H. ker nuditi zaprtim osebam dostojne razmere in jim omogočiti dostop do programov, katerih namen je, da jih pripravijo za vrnitev v družbo, pripomoreta k zmanjšanju verjetnosti, da bodo ponavljali kazniva dejanja;
H. whereas providing decent conditions for prisoners and granting them access to schemes designed to prepare them for a return to society help to reduce the likelihood that they will re-offend;
I. ker je Svet sprejel resolucije in priporočila (ki jih države članice ne izvršujejo vedno) v zvezi s posebno težavo odvisnosti od prepovedanih drog in zmanjšanjem s tem povezanih tveganj ter ki obravnavajo zlasti zdravljenje odvisnosti od drog v zaporu in na prostosti;
I. whereas the Council has adopted resolutions and recommendations (which are not always implemented by the Member States) concerning the specific problem of drug dependence and the reduction of the related risks and dealing in particular with the treatment of drug dependence in prison and outside;
J. ker je le 16 držav članic ratificiralo fakultativni protokol Konvencije proti mučenju in drugemu krutemu, nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju ali kaznovanju, sedem pa ga je podpisalo, ne pa še ratificiralo ratificirale so Bolgarija, Ciper, Češka republika, Danska, Estonija, Francija, Nemčija, Luksemburg, Malta, Nizozemska, Poljska, Romunija, Slovenija, Španija, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo; Avstrija, Belgija, Grčija, Finska, Irska, Italija in Portugalska so podpisale, pa še ne ratificirale; vir: http://www.apt.ch/npm/OPCAT0911.pdf.
J. whereas only 16 Member States have ratified the Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, while seven have signed, but not yet ratified, it Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom have ratified; Austria, Belgium, Greece, Finland, Ireland, Italy, Portugal have signed but not ratified it; source: http://www.apt.ch/npm/OPCAT0911.pdf.
K. ker dajejo nekatere države nacionalnim poslancem in poslancem Evropskega parlamenta pravico, da obiščejo zapore, in ker je EP pozval, naj se to omogoči poslancem Evropskega parlamenta po vsej EU Glej na primer resolucijo Parlamenta o razmerah v zaporih v Evropski uniji: izboljšanja in alternativne kazni, odstavek 41: „Poziva k temu, da bi poslanci Evropskega parlamenta imeli pravico obiskati in pregledati zapore in centre za pridržanje za begunce na ozemlju vse Evropske unije.“
K. whereas some Member States grant national MPs and MEPs the right to visit prisons, and whereas the EP has called for that right to be granted to MEPs throughout the territory of the EU See, for example, Parliament's resolution on prison conditions in the European Union: improvements and alternative penalties, paragraph 41: 'Calls for Members of the European Parliament to have the right to visit and inspect prisons and detention centres for refugees on the territory of the European Union' .
L. ker so otroci v posebej ranljivem položaju, kar zadeva odvzem prostosti, zlasti pripor;
L. whereas children are in a particularly vulnerable position in relation to detention, in particular pre-trial detention;
M. ker je 30. novembra 2009 Svet sprejel načrt za okrepitev postopkovnih pravic osumljencev in obdolžencev v kazenskih postopkih, ki je del stockholmskega programa in določa ključna varovala, ki bodo prispevala k zagotavljanju, da se ob prizadevanju za večje sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju kazenskega prava spoštujejo temeljne pravice;
M. whereas on 30 November 2009, the Council adopted a roadmap for strengthening the procedural rights of suspected and accused persons in criminal proceedings, which is part of the Stockholm Programme and sets out vital safeguards that will help ensure that fundamental rights are respected in the push for increased cooperation between Member States in the area of criminal justice;
5. poudarja pomen zagotavljanja, da se spoštujejo temeljne pravice, zlasti pravica do obrambe in dostopa do odvetnika, ter da so zagotovljene pravice osumljenca ali obdolženca, vključno s pravico, da ni žrtev nečloveškega ali poniževalnega ravnanja; v zvezi s tem ponovno poudarja pomen predloga Komisije o pravici do dostopa do odvetnika v kazenskem postopku in pravici do komunikacije v primeru prijetja;
Stresses the importance of ensuring that fundamental rights are respected, notably the rights of the defence and of access to a lawyer, and that the rights of suspects or accused persons are guaranteed, including the right not to be subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment; recalls, in this connection, the importance of the Commission proposal on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and on the right to communicate upon arrest;
7. poziva države članice, naj ustrezna sredstva namenijo prestrukturiranju in posodobitvi zaporov, varovanju pravic zaprtih oseb, uspešni rehabilitaciji obsojencev ter pripravi obsojencev na izpustitev in vključitev v družbo, izobraževanju policije in zaporskega osebja v zvezi s sodobnimi praksami upravljanja zaporov ter evropskimi standardi človekovih pravic, spremljanju zapornikov z mentalnimi in psihološkimi motnjami, ter naj ustvarijo posebno postavko v proračunu EU, da bi se spodbudili taki projekti;
Calls on the Member States to earmark appropriate resources for the restructuring and modernisation of prisons, to protect detainees’ rights, to successfully rehabilitate and prepare detainees for their release and social integration, to provide the police and prison staff with training based on contemporary prison management practices and European human rights standards, to monitor prisoners suffering from mental and psychological disorders, and to create a specific EU budget heading with a view to encouraging such projects;
10. ponovno poudarja, da morajo države članice spoštovati obveznosti iz mednarodnih in evropskih forumov za širšo uporabo nalog in navodil v preizkusni dobi ter sankcij, ki so alternativne zaporni kazni; to vključuje odločitve, sprejete v okviru Sveta Evrope Kot je priporočilo CM/Rec(2010)1 odbora ministrov državam članicam o pravilih Sveta Evrope o preizkusni dobi.
Reaffirms the need for Member States to honour the commitments made in international and European fora to making greater use of probation measures and sanctions which offer an alternative to imprisonment, including decisions taken within the Council of Europe Such as Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the Council of Europe Probation Rules.
15. ponovno poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da se otroci obravnavajo na način, ki upošteva njihove interese, vključno s tem, da so ločeni od odraslih in da imajo pravico, da ohranijo stik s svojimi družinami;
Reaffirms the importance of ensuring that children are treated in a manner that takes into account their best interests, including being kept separate from adults and having the right to maintain contact with their families;
19. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Svetu Evrope, parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope, komisarju Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice, evropskemu odboru za preprečevanje mučenja, Evropskemu sodišču za človekove pravice, svetu ZN za človekove pravice, odboru OZN za preprečevanje mučenja, posebnemu poročevalcu ZN o mučenju ter visokemu komisarju ZN za človekove pravice.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture, the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights, the UN Committee against Torture, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
o financiranju projekta "Šola na pedalih"
on funding for the 'Pedal at School' project
PE479.387v01-00 B7‑0688/2011 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o financiranju projekta "Šola na pedalih"
PE479.387v01-00 B7‑0688/2011 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on funding for the 'Pedal at School' project
A. ker je zaradi podnebnih sprememb, velike okoljske škode in visoke stopnje onesnaženosti vedno bolj aktualna tema okoljske trajnosti in ker morajo države članice omejiti in nadzirati škodljive emisije v ozračju ter zmanjšati porabo osnovnih virov;
A. whereas climate change, environmental disasters and high levels of pollution are making the topic of environmental sustainability all the more relevant and Member States must therefore take action to restrict and curb harmful emissions into the air and reduce consumption from primary sources,
B. ker je proizvodnja čiste energije prednostna naloga držav članic;
B. whereas the issue of clean energy production is a priority for the Member States,
C. ker je šola pomembna pri oblikovanje človeške in kulturne razsežnosti otrok;
C. having regard to the role of schools in the humanistic and cultural education of our young,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj s sredstvi izobraževalnega programa "Vseživljenjsko učenje" ter zlasti prek projekta Comenius financira poskuse na tem področju.
Calls on the Commission to fund tests in this field by using the educational funds from the Lifelong Learning Programme, in particular from the Comenius Programme.
9.12.2011 B7-0689/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
9.12.2011 B7-0689/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o večjem nadzoru nad ekološko pridelanimi proizvodi
on tighter controls on organic products
PE479.388v01-00 B7‑0689/2011 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o večjem nadzoru nad ekološko pridelanimi proizvodi
PE479.388v01-00 B7‑0689/2011 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on tighter controls on organic products
– ob upoštevanju veljavne zakonodaje o označevanju živil, ki prihajajo na ozemlje Evropske unije ali so tukaj pridelana,
– having regard to the current legislation on the labelling of food that enters, or is produced in, the European Union,
A. ker je vprašanje varnosti hrane prednostna naloga držav članic v okviru reforme skupne kmetijske politike;
A. whereas food safety is a priority issue for the Member States in the context of CAP reform,
B. ker policija v državah članicah redno odkriva goljufije nepoštenih podjetij, ki svoje proizvode lažno prodajajo kot ekološko pridelane,
B. whereas police forces in the Member States are constantly discovering cases of fraud perpetrated by dishonest firms which pass their products off as organic, when in fact they are not,
C. ker prodaja teh proizvodov škodi trgom in podjetjem, ki delajo resno in v skladu s predpisi;
C. whereas the marketing of these products penalises those markets and firms which, conversely, work seriously in compliance with all existing rules and regulations,
o preglednici dosežkov za nadzor makroekonomskih neravnovesij: predvidena začetna zasnova
on the Scoreboard for the surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances: envisaged initial design
PE479.389v01-00 B7‑0690/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o preglednici dosežkov za nadzor makroekonomskih neravnovesij: predvidena začetna zasnova
PE479.389v01-00 B7‑0690/2011 European Parliament resolution on the Scoreboard for the surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances: envisaged initial design