natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker imajo voditelji skupine G20 kolektivno odgovornost za ublažitev socialnih posledic krize, tako v državah članicah kot tudi v državah v razvoju, ki so jih hudo prizadeli posredni učinki krize; ker bi davek na finančne transakcije prispeval h kritju stroškov, nastalih zaradi krize,
whereas the G20 leaders have a collective responsibility to mitigate the social impact of the crisis, both in their member states and in developing countries, which have been hard-hit by the indirect effects of the crisis; whereas a financial transaction tax would contribute towards covering the costs generated by the crisis,
meni, da bi morala Evropska unija v mednarodnem okviru srečanj skupine G20 zavzeti skupno stališče glede možnosti o tem, kako naj finančna industrija pošteno in stvarno prispeva k plačevanju vseh bremen, ki jih je povzročila realnemu gospodarstvu, in bremen, povezanih z vladnimi intervencijami za stabilizacijo bančnega sistema; meni, da bi morala EU z ozirom na vrsto odprtih možnosti za ukrepanje vzporedno in v skladu z delom skupine G20 razviti lastno strategijo;
Is of the opinion that the European Union should agree on a common position in the international framework of G20 meetings as regards the options as to how the financial sector should make a fair and substantial contribution towards paying for any burden which it has caused to the real economy or which is associated with government interventions to stabilise the banking system; takes the view that the EU, in parallel to and consistent with the G20 work, should develop its own strategy with regard to the range of possible options for action;
s ciljem, da bi dosegli skladno stališče EU, temelječe na objektivni analizi, meni, da mora Komisija dovolj zgodaj pred naslednjim vrhunskim srečanjem G20 pripraviti oceno učinka svetovnega davka na finančne transakcije ter raziskati njegove prednosti in slabosti;
Considers, with a view to reaching a coherent EU position based on objective analysis, that the Commission should elaborate, sufficiently in advance of the next G20 Summit, an impact assessment of a global financial transaction tax, exploring its advantages as well as drawbacks;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svoji oceni pozorno preuči naslednje vidike:
Urges the Commission to carefully consider in its assessment, the following aspects:
izkušnje z davki na finančne transakcije v preteklosti, zlasti kar zadeva izogibanje davkom ter selitev kapitala oziroma storitev na druga mesta, pa tudi vpliv takšnih davkov na posamezne vlagatelje ter mala in srednje velika podjetja;
past experiences with financial transaction taxes, especially in terms of tax avoidance behaviour and migration of capital or service provision to alternative locations, especially the impact of such taxes on individual investors and SMEs;
prednosti in slabosti uvedbe davkov na finančne transakcije samo v Evropski uniji v primerjavi z njihovo uvedbo na svetovni ravni in glede na trenutne razmere;
the benefits and drawbacks of the introduction of financial transaction taxes in the European Union alone, as compared to their introduction at global level and to the current situation;
možnosti ustvarjanja precejšnjih prihodkov v primerjavi z drugimi viri davčnih prihodkov, stroški zbiranja in porazdelitev prihodkov med državami;
the potential to generate substantial revenue in comparison to other sources of tax revenues, collection costs and distribution of revenues among countries;
dejstvo, da je treba pri ocenjevanju morebitnih prihodkov iz naslova davkov na finančne transakcije na svetovni ali evropski ravni upoštevati različne možnosti oblikovanja, hkrati pa izmeriti povečanje stroškov za transakcije na vseh potencialnih trgih (posli na urejenih borzah, prosta prodaja) ter za transakcije med podjetji (B2B) in med podjetji in potrošniki (B2C);
the fact that, when assessing the potential revenues from financial transaction taxes at global or European level, account should be taken of different design options, whilst quantifying the increase in transaction costs in all markets potentially concerned (transaction on organised exchanges, over-the-counter transactions) and for Business to Business (B2B) and Business to Consumers B2C transactions;
dejstvo, da mora ocena upoštevati tudi možnost dolgoročnih in kratkoročnih vplivov različnih možnosti na ravni in stabilnost cen, pa tudi na finančne transakcije in likvidnost;
the fact that the assessment should also take into account the potential of the different options to affect both price levels and stability in the short term and long run, as well as financial transactions and liquidity;
kako oblikovati davek na finančne transakcije, da bo ublažil negativne stranske učinke, do katerih ponavadi pride pri posrednih davkih na zbiranje kapitala;
how a financial transaction tax needs to be designed in order to mitigate the negative side effects usually associated with indirect taxes on the raising of capital;
v kolikšni meri bi davek na finančne transakcije prispeval k stabilizaciji finančnih trgov v smislu učinka na prekomerno sklepanje kratkoročnih trgovskih poslov in špekulacije ter učinka na preglednost;
to what extent a financial transaction tax would contribute to the stabilisation of the financial markets in terms of its effect on excessive short-term trading and speculation and on transparency;
ali bi lahko davek na finančne transakcije preprečil finančno krizo v prihodnosti, ker bi se osredotočil na določene tipe „neželenih“ transakcij, ki bi jih opredelila Komisija;
whether a financial transaction tax could prevent a future financial crisis by targeting certain types of ‘undesirable’ transactions; which should be defined by the Commission;
poudarja, da se mora katera koli rešitev obvezno izogibati zmanjšanju konkurenčnosti EU ali oviranju trajnostnih naložb, inovacij in rasti, od katerih imata korist realno gospodarstvo in družba;
Stresses that any solution must imperatively avoid reducing EU competitiveness or hampering sustainable investment, innovation and growth, which benefit the real economy and society;
poudarja, kako pomembno je upoštevati potrebo, da mora bančni sektor nabrati zdrav kapital ter zagotoviti, da bo bančni sistem sposoben financirati naložbe realnega gospodarstva in da bo onemogočeno pretirano tveganje;
Underlines the importance of taking into account the need for the banking sector to build up healthy capital, ensuring the banking system's ability to finance real economy investments; and that excessive risk taking is prevented;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj ocenita možnosti uspeha različnih davkov na finančne transakcije, s katerimi bi prispevali v proračun EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to assess the potential of different financial transaction tax options to contribute to the EU budget;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj ocenita v kolikšni meri bi bilo mogoče možnosti, ki jih preučujeta, uporabiti kot inovativne finančne mehanizme, s katerimi bi v državah v razvoju podprli prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam in ublažitev njihovih posledic, ter za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to assess to which extent the options under consideration could also be used as innovative financial mechanisms to provide support for adaptation to and mitigation of climate change for developing countries, as well as for financing development cooperation;
naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropski centralni banki ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. marca 2009 o uresničevanju enotnega območja plačil v eurih Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0139 .
having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2009 on the implementation of the Single Euro Payments Area Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2009)0139 .
ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropske komisije in Evropske centralne banke, v kateri so pojasnjena določena načela prihodnjega poslovnega modela SEPA za neposredne bremenitve z dne 24. marca 2009,
having regard to the joint statement by the European Commission and the European Central Bank clarifying certain principles underlying a future SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) business model of 24 March 2009,
ob upoštevanju druge študije Komisije o pripravljenosti javne uprave in prehoda na enotno območje plačil v eurih z dne 22. julija 2009,
having regard to the Commission's second survey on public administrations‘ preparedness and migration to SEPA of 22 July 2009,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. septembra 2009 – Dokončanje enotnega območja plačil v evrih: načrt za obdobje 2009-2012 ( KOM(2009)0471 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 September 2009: Completing SEPA: a Roadmap for 2009-2012 ( COM(2009)0471 ),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 924/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o čezmejnih plačilih v Skupnosti in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2560/2001 UL L 266, 9.10.2009, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on cross-border payments in the Community and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 OJ L 266, 9.10.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 30. oktobra 2009: Uporaba člena 81 Pogodbe ES pri večstranskih medbančnih plačilih v enotnem območju plačil v eurih ( SEC(2009)1472 ),
having regard to the Working Document of the Commission of 30 October 2009: Applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to multilateral interbank-payments in SEPA Direct Debit ( SEC(2009)1472 ),
ob upoštevanju drugega letnega poročila Komisije o napredku pri prehodu na enotno območje plačil v eurih v letu 2009 z dne 9. novembra 2009,
having regard to the Commission's second annual Progress Report on the State of SEPA Migration in 2009 of 9 November 2009,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2009 o enotnem območju plačil v eurih,
having regard to the Council conclusions of 2 December 2009 on SEPA,
ker je enotno območje plačil v eurih (območje SEPA) zamišljeno kot integriran trg za plačilne storitve, na katerem vlada učinkovita konkurenca in na katerem ni razlike med čezmejnimi in nacionalnimi plačili v eurih,
whereas the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) is to be an integrated market for payment services, which is subject to effective competition and in which there is no distinction between cross-border and national payments in euros,
ker območje SEPA ni le samoregulativna pobuda Evropskega sveta za plačila, ampak tudi pomembna javna politična pobuda za krepitev ekonomske in monetarne unije ter prihodnje strategije EU 2020; ker je območje SEPA podprto z direktivo o plačilnih storitvah, s čimer je zagotovljen potreben usklajen pravni okvir; ker zato uspeh območja SEPA vzbuja posebno pozornost Parlamenta,
whereas SEPA should be not only a self-regulatory initiative by the European Payments Council (EPC), but also a major public policy initiative reinforcing the Economic and Monetary Union and the future EU 2020 Strategy; whereas SEPA is supported by the Payment Services Directive, which provides the necessary harmonised legal framework; and whereas the success of SEPA is, therefore, a matter of particular interest to Parliament,
ker je proces sprejemanja odločitev v območju SEPA sedaj v pristojnosti Evropskega sveta za plačila, v katerem samo banke sprejemajo odločitve glede proizvodov SEPA, ne da bi upoštevale zahteve končnih uporabnikov,
whereas the SEPA decision-making process is currently at the discretion of the European Payments Council (EPC), where only banks take decisions on SEPA products neglecting end-users‘ requests,
ker se je prehod na območje SEPA uradno začel 28. januarja 2008 z uvedbo plačilnega instrumenta SEPA za nakazila, medtem ko je okvir SEPA za uporabo kartic v veljavi od 1. januarja 2008, sistem SEPA za neposredne bremenitve pa se je začel uporabljati 2. novembra 2009,
whereas SEPA officially started on 28 January 2008 with the launch of the SEPA payment instrument for credit transfer (SCT), while the SEPA Cards Framework has been in force since 1 January 2008, and the SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) scheme started on 2 November 2009,
ker so potrošniki izrazili zaskrbljenost, da morajo lastnosti proizvodov SEPA zadovoljiti dejanske potrebe končnih uporabnikov, zlasti kar zadeva preverjanje pooblastil za neposredne bremenitve, in ker je zaželeno, da se doseže napredek pri reševanju tega vprašanja,
whereas consumers have expressed concern that the features of SEPA products should meet existing end-users‘ needs, notably in relation to the checking of mandates for direct debits, and whereas it is desirable that progress is made towards addressing this issue,
ker ni bil določen pravno zavezujoč rok za prehod na instrumente SEPA in ker je velika večina, ki se je odzvala na javno posvetovanje Komisije, podprla zamisel o določitvi roka, da bi se spodbudil prehod na enotno območje plačil v eurih,
whereas no legally binding end-date for migration to SEPA instruments has been set, and whereas a large majority responding to a public consultation by the Commission supported the idea of setting such an end-date to stimulate SEPA migration,
ker je kandidat za komisarja za notranji trg in storitve v svojih pisnih odgovorih na vprašalnik Parlamenta izjavil, da je Komisiji nameraval predlagati sprejetje zakonodajne pobude, ki bi določila enega ali več rokov za prehod na proizvode SEPA za neposredne bremenitve in bančna nakazila, in pobudo za boljše upravljanje,
whereas the Commissioner-designate for the Internal Market and Services stated in his written answers to Parliament's questionnaire that he intended to propose a legislative initiative for adoption by the Commission with the objective of setting one or more deadlines for migration to SEPA products for direct debits and credit transfers, as well as an initiative to improve governance,
ker je prehod na območje SEPA počasen – v avgustu 2009 je bilo opravljenih samo 4,5 % vseh transakcij v obliki nakazil SEPA – in ker je postal rok, prvotno predviden za prehod kritične mase za sistem bančnih nakazil, sistem za neposredno bremenitev in plačila s kartico do konca leta 2010, nerealističen,
whereas migration to SEPA has been sluggish: in August 2009, only 4.5 % of total transactions had been made by way of the SEPA Credit Transfer format, and whereas the deadline originally foreseen, namely the migration of a critical mass for SCT, SDD and card payments by end-2010, has become unrealistic,
ker javne uprave v večini držav članic pri prehodu na instrumente SEPA zaostajajo za pričakovanji, čeprav bi morali imeti ti organi vlogo katalizatorja pri zagotavljanju kritične mase, potrebne za pospešitev prehoda na območje SEPA,
whereas migration to SEPA instruments by public administrations is lagging behind expectations in most Member States, though these bodies should play a catalytic role in creating the critical mass needed to accelerate migration towards SEPA,
ker je pomembno, da pri uresničevanju območja SEPA sodelujejo vse zainteresirane strani: zakonodajalci, bančna industrija in uporabniki plačilnih storitev,
whereas it is important that all relevant stakeholders – legislators, the banking industry and payment services users – are involved in the achievement of SEPA,
ker Uredba (ES) št. 924/2009 zagotavlja pravno varnost pri uporabi večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo v prehodnem obdobju do 31. oktobra 2012, v katerem mora industrija oblikovati in se sporazumeti o skupnem, dolgoročnem poslovnem modelu za delovanje sistema SEPA za neposredne bremenitve, ki mora biti v skladu z zakonodajo ES o konkurenci in regulativnim okvirom Skupnosti,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 provides for legal certainty as regards the application of multilateral interchange fees (MIF) during a transitional period until 31 October 2012, in which industry should develop and agree a common, long-term business model for the operation of the SEPA Direct Debit which should be in line with EC competition law and the Community regulatory framework,
ker sta Komisija in Evropska centralna banka marca 2009 naznanili, da se zdi, da ni jasnega in prepričljivega razloga za obstoj večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo po 31. oktobru 2012, in ker je Komisija organizirala javno posvetovanje o uporabi člena 81 Pogodbe ES pri večstranskih medbančnih plačilih v enotnem območju plačil v eurih,
whereas in March 2009, the Commission and the European Central Bank indicated that there appeared to be no clear and convincing reason for a per transaction MIF to exist after 31 October 2012, and whereas the Commission conducted a public consultation on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to multilateral interbank-payments in SEPA Direct Debit,
ker bi bilo treba prav tako rešiti uporabo večstranske pristojbine za izmenjavo nedvomno v zvezi z rešitvijo kartice EU na podlagi okvira SEPA za uporabo kartic,
whereas the application of a MIF should also be resolved definitely with regard to an EU card solution based on the SEPA Cards Framework,
ker bi bilo treba zagotoviti nadaljnjo pravno veljavnost obstoječih pooblastil za neposredne bremenitve v vseh državah članicah, saj bi bil obvezen podpis novih pooblastil pri prehodu z nacionalnih sistemov neposrednih bremenitev na sistem SEPA za neposredne bremenitve težaven; ker ohranitev pooblastil ne prispeva k skorajšnjemu uresničevanju sistema SEPA za neposredne bremenitve, razen če se najde rešitev za prehod obstoječih pooblastil,
whereas the continued legal validity of existing direct debit mandates should be ensured in all Member States, as the obligation to sign new mandates when switching from national direct debit schemes to the SEPA Direct Debit scheme would be burdensome; whereas, however, the maintenance of these mandates does not contribute to an early implementation of the SEPA Direct Debit scheme unless a solution to migrating existing mandates is found,
poudarja, da še naprej podpira vzpostavitev območja SEPA, kjer vlada učinkovita konkurenca in na katerem ni razlike med čezmejnimi in nacionalnimi plačili v eurih;
Emphasises its continued support for the creation of SEPA, which is subject to effective competition and in which there is no distinction between cross-border and national payments in euros;
obžaluje, da od sprejetja resolucije Parlamenta z dne 12. marca 2009 o uresničevanju enotnega območja plačil v eurih skoraj ni bilo napredka pri vprašanjih, omenjenih v resoluciji, ter poziva k sodelovanju vseh zainteresiranih strani pri spodbujanju in uresničevanju enotnega območja plačil v eurih;
Regrets that hardly any progress has been made as regards the issues mentioned in Parliament's resolution on the implementation of SEPA of 12 March 2009 since its adoption, and calls for the involvement of all stakeholders to promote and contribute to achieving SEPA;
pozdravlja načrt za uresničevanje enotnega območja plačil v eurih, ki ga je sprejela Komisija septembra 2009, ter v celoti podpira v načrtu opredeljene ukrepe na šestih področjih (pospešitev prehoda; povečevanje osveščenosti in spodbujanje proizvodov SEPA; oblikovanje zdravega pravnega okolja za območje SEPA in krepitev skladnosti z njim; spodbujanje inovacij; zagotavljanje potrebne standardizacije, medopravilnosti in varnosti; pojasnitev in izboljšanje upravljanja območja SEPA);
Welcomes the SEPA roadmap adopted by the Commission in September 2009, and fully supports the actions set out therein in six priority areas (i.e. foster migration; raise SEPA awareness and promote SEPA products; design a sound legal environment for SEPA and strengthen SEPA compliance; promote innovation; ensure necessary standardisation, interoperability and security; clarify and improve the governance of SEPA);
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj določi jasen, ustrezen in zavezujoč rok za prehod na proizvode SEPA, ki se lahko določi za najkasneje 31. december 2012, po tem datumu pa bi morala biti vsa plačila v eurih izvedena po standardih SEPA;
Calls again on the Commission to set a clear, appropriate and binding end-date, which should be no later than 31 December 2012, for migrating to SEPA instruments, after which all payments in euros must be made using the SEPA standards;
poziva Evropski svet za plačila, naj upošteva zahteve končnih uporabnikov in posledično spremeni svoj pravilnik;
Calls on the European Payment Council to take into consideration the end-users‘ requests and subsequently modify its rulebooks;
v celoti podpira namero Komisije, da pospeši proces prehoda javne uprave s pripravo integriranih in sinhroniziranih nacionalnih načrtov prehoda; s tem v zvezi pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da prouči in objavi pripravljenost in prehod na območje SEPA javnih uprav držav članic ter poziva države članice, naj sodelujejo pri teh raziskavah;
Fully supports the Commission's intention to foster public administrations‘ migration process through the drawing up of integrated and synchronised national migration plans; in this respect, welcomes the Commission's efforts to survey and publish the Member States’ public administrations‘ preparedness and migration to SEPA, and calls on Member States to take part in these surveys;
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi izida posvetovanj z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi najkasneje do 30. septembra 2010 dokončno pojasni vprašanje usklajenega dolgoročnega poslovnega modela za delovanje sistema SEPA za neposredne bremenitve, ki mora biti uporaben v celotni Evropi, stroškovno učinkovit in prilagojen končnemu uporabniku; vztraja, da je takšen model treba razviti v tesnem sodelovanju med plačilnim sektorjem in Komisijo ter v skladu z zakonodajo ES o konkurenci in regulativnim okvirom Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission to clarify definitely and no later than 30 September 2010, based on the outcome of the respective consultation, including all the stakeholders, the issue of a harmonised long-term economic model for SEPA direct debits, which has to be Europe-wide applicable, cost efficient and end-consumer convenient; insists on the need for this model to be developed in close cooperation between the payment sector and the Commission and in line with EC competition law and the Community regulatory framework;
poziva vse zainteresirane strani, naj podprejo vzpostavitev evropskega sistema za kartice, ki naj bo ali dopolnilen nov sistem, povezava med obstoječimi sistemi ali razširitev obstoječega sistema; s tem v zvezi ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje pojasni vprašanje večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo za plačila s karticami ter poziva industrijo, naj najde ustrezne rešitve v tesnem sodelovanju s Komisijo, ki bodo skladne z zakonodajo ES o konkurenci ter regulativnim okvirom Skupnosti;
Calls on all stakeholders to support the setting-up of a European card scheme, to be either a complementary new scheme, an alliance between existing schemes or an expansion of an existing scheme; in this respect, calls again on the Commission to clarify further the issue of a MIF for card payments, and calls on the industry to find proper solutions, in close cooperation with the Commission, in line with EC competition law and the Community regulatory framework;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo nadaljnjo pravno veljavnost obstoječih pooblastil za neposredne bremenitve v sistemu SEPA za neposredne bremenitve; poudarja, da prehod z obstoječega sistema neposredne bremenitve na sistem SEPA za neposredne bremenitve ne bi smel obremeniti potrošnikov;
Calls on Member States to ensure the continued legal validity of existing direct debit mandates in the SEPA Direct Debit scheme; emphasises that the transition from the existing direct debit scheme to the SEPA Direct Debit scheme should not cause any burden for consumers;
vztraja, da bi morali biti potrošniki nazorno obveščeni o razlikah med starim in novim sistemom;
Insists that consumers should be clearly informed about the differences between the former scheme and the new scheme;