natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(15) Glede na to, da kriza, kakršne v zgodovini ne pomnimo in ki je prizadela mednarodne finančne trge ter povzročila upad gospodarstva, kar je resno omajalo finančno stabilnost številnih držav članic, zahteva nagel odziv, ki bo ublažil njen vpliv na celotno gospodarstvo, bi ta uredba morala začeti veljati takoj, ko bo to možno .
(15) As the unprecedented crisis affecting international financial markets and the economic downturn which have seriously damaged the financial stability of several Member States necessitates a rapid response in order to counter the effects on the economy as a whole, this Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible .
Glede na izredne okoliščine zadevnih držav članic, bi se morala uporabljati za nazaj , z začetkom od proračunskega leta 2010 ali od dne, ko je bila finančna pomoč dana na voljo, odvisno do statusa države članice prosilke, in sicer za vsa obdobja, v katerih so države članice prejemale finančno pomoč od Unije ali druge države članice euroobmočja, da se začnejo odpravljati hude težave držav s finančno stabilnostjo .
Given the exceptional circumstances of the Member States concerned, it should apply retroactively, starting either from the budgetary year of 2010 or from the date on which the financial assistance was made available, depending on the requesting Member State's status, for the periods during which the Member States received financial assistance from the Union or from other euro-area Member States in order to address serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability,
(15a) Če je predvideno začasno povečanje vmesnih plačil, bi ga bilo treba obravnavati tudi glede na proračunske omejitve, s katerimi se soočajo vse države članice, te proračunske omejitve pa bi se morale ustrezno odražati v splošnem proračunu Evropske unije.
(15a) Where a temporary increase in interim payments is envisaged, that temporary increase should also be considered in the context of the budgetary restraints facing all Member States, and those budgetary restraints should be reflected appropriately in the general budget of the European Union.
Mehanizem bi se torej moral začeti uporabljati 1. januarja 2010, uporabljal pa bi se najdlje do 31. decembra 2013.
Therefore application of the mechanism should start on 1 January 2010 and its duration should be limited until 31 December 2013.
(15b) Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 z dne 27. julija 2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo je zato treba ustrezno spremeniti.
(15b) Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Fisheries Fund 1 should therefore be amended accordingly.
1 UL L 223, 15.8.2006, str.
1 OJ L 223, 15.8.2006, p.
Člen 76 – odstavek 3 a (novo)
Article 76 - paragraph 3 a (new)
Povečana vmesna plačila na podlagi uporabe odstavka 3 se dajo čim prej na voljo organu za upravljanje in se uporabijo le za plačila za izvajanje operativnega programa.
The increased interim payments resulting from the application of paragraph 3 shall be made available within the shortest period of time to the managing authority and shall only be used for making payments in connection with the implementation of the operational programme.
Člen 76 – odstavek 3 b (novo)
Article 76 - paragraph 3 b (new)
Pri letnih poročilih v skladu s členom 67(1) države članice Komisiji predložijo ustrezne informacije o uporabi odstopanja iz člena 76(3), ki prikazujejo, kako višji zneski podpore prispevajo k spodbujanju konkurenčnosti, rasti in delovnih mest v zadevni državi članici.
In the context of the annual reporting in accordance with Article 67(1), the Member States shall provide the Commission with appropriate information on the use of the derogation referred to in Article 76(3) showing how the increased amounts of support has contributed to the promotion of competitiveness, growth and jobs in the Member State concerned.
Komisija te informacije upošteva pri pripravi letnega poročila iz člena 68(1).
This information shall be taken into account by the Commission in the preparation of the annual reporting provided for by Article 68(1).
Člen 77 – odstavek 2
Article 77 - paragraph 2
Ne glede na člen 53(3) se na zahtevo države članice končna plačila lahko povišajo za znesek, ki je za deset odstotnih točk višji od stopnje sofinanciranja, ki se uporablja za vsako izmed prednostnih osi, in ki se prišteje k znesku javnih izdatkov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za pridobitev pomoči ter so na novo prijavljeni v vsakem izmed potrjenih izkazov, predloženih v obdobju, v katerem država članica izpolnjuje enega izmed naslednjih pogojev :
By way of derogation from Article 53 (3), on the request of a Member State, payments of the final balance may be increased, by an amount corresponding to ten percentage points above the co-financing rate applicable to each priority axis, to be applied to the amount of eligible public expenditure newly declared in each certified statement of expenditure submitted during the period in which a Member State meets one of the following conditions :
Ne glede na člen 53(3) se na zahtevo države članice končna plačila povišajo za znesek, ki je za deset odstotnih točk višji od stopnje sofinanciranja, ki se uporablja za vsako izmed prednostnih osi za največ sto odstotkov , in ki se prišteje k znesku javnih izdatkov, ki izpolnjujejo pogoje za pridobitev pomoči ter so na novo prijavljeni v vsakem izmed potrjenih izkazov, predloženih v obdobju, v katerem država članica izpolnjuje enega izmed pogojev iz točk (a) do (c) člena 76(3).
By way of derogation from Article 53(3), at the request of a Member State, payments of the final balance shall be increased, by an amount corresponding to ten percentage points above the co-financing rate applicable to each priority axis up to a maximum of one hundred per cent , to be applied to the amount of eligible public expenditure newly declared in each certified statement of expenditure submitted during the period in which a Member State meets one of the conditions laid down in points (a) to (c) of Article 76(3).
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 – točka a
Article 77 - paragraph 2 - point a
(a) na voljo ji je finančna pomoč v okviru Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 407/2010 o vzpostavitvi Evropskega mehanizma za finančno stabilizacijo* ali pomoč s strani druge države članice euroobmočja pred začetkom veljave navedene uredbe;
(a) financial assistance is made available to it under Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism or, is made available by other euro-area Member States before the entry into force of that Regulation;
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 – točka b
Article 77 - paragraph 2 - point b
(b) na voljo ji je srednjeročna finančna pomoč v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002**;
(b) medium-term financial assistance is made available to it in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002;
Člen 77 – odstavek 2 – točka c
Article 77 - paragraph 2 - point c
(c) na voljo ji je finančna pomoč v skladu s Pogodbo o ustanovitvi evropskega mehanizma za stabilnost, ki je bila podpisana 11. julija 2011.
(c) financial assistance is made available to it in accordance with the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism signed on 11 July 2011.
Člen 77 a (novo) – odstavek 1
Article 77 a (new) - paragraph 1
Ne glede na člena 76(3) in 77(2) prispevek Skupnosti v obliki vmesnih in končnih plačil ni višji od javnega prispevka in najvišjega zneska pomoči iz skladov za vsako prednostno os ter za vsak cilj, kot je določeno v sklepu Komisije o potrditvi operativnega programa.“
Notwithstanding Article 76 paragraph 3, and Article 77 paragraph 2, the Union contribution through interim payments and payments of the final balance shall not be higher than the public contribution and the maximum amount of assistance from the Funds for each priority axis and objective as laid down in the decision of the Commission approving the operational programme.
Ne glede na člen 76(3) in člen 77(2) prispevek Unije v obliki vmesnih in končnih plačil ni višji od javnega prispevka in najvišjega zneska pomoči iz skladov za vsako prednostno os ter za vsak cilj, kot je določeno v sklepu Komisije o potrditvi operativnega programa.“
Notwithstanding Articles 76 ( 3 ) and 77 ( 2 ) , the Union contribution through interim payments and payments of the final balance shall not be higher than the public contribution and the maximum amount of assistance from the Funds for each priority axis and objective as laid down in the decision of the Commission approving the operational programme.
Člen 77 a (novo) – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Article 77 a (new) - paragraph 1 a (new)
Odstopanje iz člena 76(3) in člena 77(2) Komisija odobri na pisno prošnjo države članice, ki izpolnjuje enega od pogojev iz točk (a) do (c) člena 76(3).
The derogation referred to in Articles 76(3) and 77(2) shall be granted by the Commission upon the written request of a Member State meeting one of the conditions mentioned in points (a) to (c) of Article 76(3).
Prošnja se vloži v dveh mesecih po začetku veljavnosti te uredbe ali v dveh mesecih od dne, ko država članica izpolni enega od pogojev iz točk (a) do (c) člena 76(3).
The request shall be submitted within two months from the entry into force of this Regulation or within two months from the date on which a Member State meets one of the conditions laid down in points (a) to (c) of Article 76(3).
Člen 77 a (novo) – odstavek 1 b (novo)
Article 77 a (new) - paragraph 1 b (new)
Država članica v svoji prošnji, ki jo predloži Komisiji, utemelji potrebo po odstopanju iz člena 76(3) in člena 77(2) ter zagotovi potrebne informacije, da se ugotovi:
In its request submitted to the Commission, the Member State shall justify the necessity of the derogation referred to in Articles 76(3) and 77(2), by providing information necessary to establish:
(a) da glede na podatke o njenem makroekonomskem in fiskalnem položaju niso na voljo sredstva za nacionalno protipostavko;
(a) by means of data on its macroeconomic and fiscal situation, that no resources for the national counterpart are available;
(b) da je povečanje plačil iz člena 76(3) in člena 77(2) potrebno za zagotovitev nadaljnjega izvajanja operativnih programov;
(b) that an increase of payments referred to in Articles 76(3) and 77(2) is necessary to safeguard the continued implementation of operational programmes;
(c) da težave ne bodo odpravljene kljub uporabi najvišjih stopenj sofinanciranja iz člena 53(3);
(c) that problems persist even if the maximum ceilings applicable to co-financing rates of Article 53(3) are used.
(d) da država članica izpolnjuje enega od pogojev iz točk (a) do (c) člena 76(3), kot utemeljuje sklic na sklep Sveta ali drug pravni akt ter dejanski datum, ko je bila finančna pomoč dana na voljo državi članici.
(d) that it fulfils one of the conditions referred to in points (a) to (c) of Article 76(3), as justified by reference to a Council Decision or other legal act, as well as the actual date from which the financial assistance was made available to the Member State.
Komisija preveri, ali predložene informacije upravičujejo odobritev odstopanja.
The Commission shall verify whether the information submitted justifies granting a derogation.
Komisija predloži pripombe o predloženih informacijah v 30 dneh po vložitvi prošnje.
The Commission shall raise any objection as to that information within 30 days from the day of submission of the request.
Če Komisija sklene nasprotovati prošnji države članice, o tem sprejme sklep in navede razloge.
If the Commission decides to object to the Member State's request, the Commission shall adopt a decision, to this effect and shall state reasons.
Če Komisija ne nasprotuje prošnji države članice, prošnja velja za upravičeno.
If the Commission does not raise an objection to the Member State's request, that request shall be deemed to be justified.
Člen 77 a (novo) – odstavek 1 c (novo)
Article 77 a (new) - paragraph 1 c (new)
Država članica v prošnji navede tudi podrobnosti o nameravani uporabi odstopanja iz člena 76(3) in člena 77(2) ter informacije o načrtovanih dodatnih ukrepih, da bi usmerila sredstva v konkurenčnost, rast in zaposlovanje, vključno s spremembo operativnih programov, kjer je to ustrezno.
The Member State's request shall also detail the intended use of the derogation, provided for in Articles 76(3) and 77(2), and shall give information about complementary measures envisaged in order to concentrate the funds on competitiveness, growth and employment, including, where appropriate, a modification of operational programmes.
Člen 77 a (novo) – odstavek 1 d (novo)
Article 77 a (new) - paragraph 1 d (new)
Odstopanje iz člena 76(3) in člena 77(2) ne velja za izkaze o izdatkih, predložene po 31. decembru 2013.“
The derogation provided for in Articles 76(3) and 77(2) shall not apply to statements of expenditure submitted after 31 December 2013."
Vendar se uporablja za nazaj v naslednjih državah članicah , in sicer od trenutka , ko jim je bila dana na voljo finančna pomoč :
However, it shall apply retroactively to the following Member States with effect from the moment financial assistance was made available to them:
Vendar se uporablja za nazaj v naslednjih državah članicah : za Irsko, Grčijo in Portugalsko od dneva , ko jim je bila dana na voljo finančna pomoč na podlagi člena 76(3), ter za Madžarsko, Latvijo in Romunijo od 1. januarja 2010 .
However, it shall apply retroactively to the following Member States : in the cases of Ireland, Greece and Portugal with effect from the day when the financial assistance was made available to those Member States pursuant to Article 76(3), and in the cases of Hungary, Latvia and Romania with effect from 1 January 2010.
(a) na Irskem od 10. decembra 2010;
(a) Ireland from 10 December 2010;
(b) v Grčiji od 11. maja 2010;
(b) Greece from 11 May 2010;
(c) v Latviji od 23. januarja 2009;
(c) Latvia from 23 January 2009;
(d) na Madžarskem od 5. novembra 2008;
(d) Hungary from 5 November 2008;
(e) na Portugalskem od 24. maja 2011;
(e) Portugal from 24 May 2011;
(f) v Romuniji od 11. maja 2009;
(f) Romania from 11 May 2009;
Komisija ugotavlja, da finančna in gospodarska kriza, ki še vedno traja, čedalje bolj pritiska na nacionalne finančne vire.
The Commission recognises that the sustained financial and economic crisis is increasing the pressure on national financial resources.
V takih okoliščinah je po njenem mnenju zagotavljanje nemotenega izvajanja kohezijskih programov izrednega pomena za prilivanje sredstev v gospodarstvo.
In this context, it considers ensuring a smooth implementation of cohesion programmes to be of particular importance as a tool for injecting funds into the economy.
Vendar je zaradi težav z likvidnostjo, ki jim botrujejo proračunske omejitve, izvajanje teh programov pogosto oteženo, zlasti za tiste države članice, ki jih je kriza najbolj prizadela.
Nonetheless, the liquidity problems resulting from budget constraints are making it difficult to implement the programmes, particularly in the Member States which have been most affected by the crisis.
Da bi se zagotovilo, da zadevne države članice nadaljujejo z izvajanjem programov Evropskega sklada za ribištvo na svojem ozemlju in še naprej namenjajo sredstva za projekte, določbe predloga Komisije omogočajo povečanje njenih prispevkov tem državam v obdobju, ko so te vključene v mehanizme finančne pomoči.
In order to ensure that these Member States continue the implementation of the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) programmes on the ground and disburse funds to projects, the Commission proposal contains provisions that would allow increased payments to be made to these countries for the period they are under the support mechanisms.
Konkretno se predlaga, da se bodo plačila povečala za znesek, ki bo izračunan tako, da se bodo stopnje sofinanciranja, ki se uporabljajo za prednostno os programov, povečale za deset odstotnih točk za na novo potrjene izdatke, predložene v zadevnem časovnem obdobju.
More specifically, it is proposed that a top-up of ten percentage points will be applied to the co-financing rates applicable to the priority axis of the programmes for newly certified expenditure submitted during the period in question.
Pri povečanju zneska je treba paziti, da stopnja sofinanciranja programa ne presega za več kot 10 odstotnih točk najvišjih stopenj in najvišjega zneska prispevka iz člena 53(3) uredbe o ESR (75 % za regije, upravičene do pomoči v okviru konvergenčnega cilja, in 50 % za regije, ki do te pomoči niso upravičene).
In applying the top-up, the co-financing rate of the programme cannot exceed by more than 10 percentage points the maximum ceilings set in Article 53(3)of the EFF Regulation (75% and 50% respectively for eligible and non-eligible regions under the Convergence Objective).
To splošnega proračuna ne bo dodatno bremenilo, saj se skupni finančni prispevek Evropskega sklada za ribištvo zadevnim državam in programom, ki je predviden za določeno obdobje, s tem ne bo spremenil.
This increase will not impose any additional financial burden on the overall budget, since the total financial allocation for the period from the EFF to the countries and the programmes in question will not change.
Gospodarska in finančna kriza v Uniji se v posameznih državah članicah kaže na različne načine.
The impact of the economic and financial crisis in the EU has affected and continues to affect the individual Member States in different ways.
Zaradi glavnih področij politik in usmeritev, ki so zaznamovale proces integracije, so zlasti v zadnjem desetletju razlike in neravnovesja v Uniji še bolj poudarjeni.
Particularly over the past decade, the main policies and guidelines that set the course for the integration process have tended to accentuate disparities and imbalances within the EU.
Neenakosti, ki smo jim priča, segajo na različna področja.
The consequences of these imbalances take many forms.
Eno od njih je sposobnost dostopanja do sredstev Unije in njihove uporabe.
One is the capacity to access and utilise Community funds.
Tako imenovani programi finančne pomoči, zlasti najnovejši programi pod okriljem Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, Evropske centralne banke in Komisije, so razmere še dodatno poslabšali.
The so-called financial assistance programmes, particularly the most recent programmes under the aegis of the IMF, the ECB and the Commission, have exacerbated this situation considerably.
Politične odločitve, ki temeljijo na teh programih, vodijo države, upravičene do take pomoči, in njihovo prebivalstvo v globoko in tragično gospodarsko recesijo, ki uničuje velik del gospodarskega in socialnega tkiva ter hkrati vpliva na možnosti zasebnih naložb (zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij) in javnih naložb, ki so ponekod tako nizke kot še nikoli.
The political options set out in these programmes are leading the countries targeted for assistance and their populations into a dramatic and deep economic recession which is destroying a large part of their economic and social fabric, affecting both private investment capacity (particularly of SMEs) and public investment, which in some cases has been reduced to historic lows.
Tudi že dolgo nujen predlog Komisije za povečano sofinanciranje Unije državam, ki so v večjih težavah, ob hkratnem proporcionalnem zmanjšanju nacionalnih prizadevanj, ki se zahtevajo za uporabo sredstev, je žal prišel zelo pozno.
Thus the Commission proposal to increase Community co-financing for the countries facing the greatest difficulties, with a corresponding reduction in the national effort required in order to take up funding, has long been necessary and comes regrettably late.
V konkretnem primeru Evropskega sklada za ribištvo so, kot je bilo ugotovljeno v tretjem letnem poročilu o izvajanju Evropskega sklada za ribištvo (2009), „države zaradi nacionalnih varčevalnih ukrepov omejile svoje sofinanciranje“ in „kreditni krč [...] je najbolj prizadel zasebne upravičence“, to pa je vodilo v nizko stopnjo črpanja razpoložljivih sredstev.
In the specific case of the EFF, as noted in the third annual report on implementation of the EFF (2009), 'national austerity measures constrained national co-financing' and 'private beneficiaries (...) were most affected by the credit crunch', which led to a low rate of take-up of the available funding.
V navedenem poročilu je Komisija izjavila, da „bo državam članicam pri pospeševanju izvajanja programa pomagala z boljšim projektiranjem ukrepov“ in je navedla možnost uporabe pospeševalcev za boljšo uporabo Evropskega sklada za ribištvo.
In the same report, the Commission stated that it would 'assist Member States in fostering programme implementation by a better design of measures' and referred to the possible use of facilitators with a view to improved utilisation of the EFF.
Opozoriti je treba tudi na škodljive učinke dodeljevanja največjega dela sredstev za razrez plovil, s čemer se ne pospešuje rast gospodarske dejavnosti, temveč je učinek ravno nasproten.
Attention should also be drawn to the perverse fact that most appropriations have been allocated to the scrapping of vessels and consequently have made no contribution whatever to boosting economic activity, instead having the opposite effect.
Čeprav je predlog Komisije pozen, je dobrodošel.
Even though the Commission proposal comes late, it is welcome.
Ker je nujen, poročevalec predlaga, da se sprejme v prvi obravnavi v obliki, kakršno predlaga Komisija, čeprav ima nekatere pomanjkljivosti.
Bearing in mind that its approval is a matter of urgency, the rapporteur proposes that it be approved at first reading as it stands, notwithstanding a number of limitations that it presents.
Vendar želi podati naslednje pripombe in priporočila ter upa, da jih bo Komisija ustrezno upoštevala:
He would however make the following remarks and recommendations and hopes that the Commission will duly take them into account:
– Komisija bi morala oceniti, v kolikšni meri bo ta ukrep zadevnim državam članicam dejansko zagotovil potrebna sredstva za izvajanje projektov in oživitev gospodarstva.
– The Commission should assess the extent to which this measure will indeed 'provide the Member States concerned with the funds necessary to support projects and the recovery of the economy'.
Opozoriti je treba, da omejitve za naložbe, ki jih uvajajo tako imenovani programi finančne pomoči, lahko tudi v novo nastalih pogojih še naprej ovirajo mobilizacijo zahtevanih nacionalnih prizadevanj (15 % za regije, upravičene do pomoči v okviru konvergenčnega cilja, in 40 % za regije, ki do te pomoči niso upravičene).
It should be pointed out that, even under the new conditions, the restrictions on investment imposed by the so-called assistance programmes may still make it difficult to mobilise the national effort required (15% and 40% respectively for eligible and non-eligible regions under the Convergence Objective).
Komisija bo morala predvideti bodisi nujno odpravo zadevnih omejitev za naložbe bodisi možnost, da še dodatno zmanjša nacionalno sofinanciranje.
The Commission should therefore give consideration to both the need to lift these restrictions on investment and the possibility of further reducing national co-financing.
– Poudariti je treba, da predlog Komisije ne povečuje razpoložljivega proračuna za vsako od držav v težavah.
– It should be stressed that the Commission proposal does not increase the budget available for each of the countries that are experiencing difficulties.
Praktična posledica zmanjšanja nacionalnih prizadevanj bo usmeritev primerljivo nižjega skupnega zneska plačil za naložbe v sektor.
The practical result of reducing the national effort will be that a comparatively lower overall amount of appropriations will be channelled into investment in the sector.
Zato bodo tudi možnosti za rast, ki izhajajo iz izvedenih naložb, bolj omejene.
The growth prospects opened up by the investment made will thus also be reduced.
Ponovno je pod vprašajem prav načelo kohezije, zato bo Komisija morala predvideti možnost, da se povečajo sredstva, odobrena tem državam.
The cohesion principle itself is again being called into question, and the Commission should look into the possibility of increasing the funds available to these countries.