natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
84. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sodelujejo pri doseganju višje ravni primerljivosti šolskih in univerzitetnih učnih načrtov ter izobraževalnih sistemov v EU, s poenostavljenim medsebojnim priznavanjem diplom, tudi s ciljem spodbujanja medsebojnega priznavanja strokovnih nazivov, kar je osrednjega pomena; poudarja obstoječe razlike med njimi in med kvalifikacijami za regulirane poklice, vendar z željo po splošni liberalizaciji dostopa; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja dejstvo, da je vedno več čezmejnega sodelovanja med visokimi šolami in univerzami, ter poziva države članice, naj to podprejo;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to cooperate on achieving higher comparability of school and University curricula and education systems in the EU , through simplified mutual recognition of diplomas, with a view also to promoting mutual recognition of educational qualifications, which is vital; stresses, however, that this is different from the recognition of qualifications for the regulated professions, although it would like to see more liberalised access in general to these professions; welcomes in this context the fact that increasing numbers of cross-border cooperation agreements are being concluded between colleges and universities and calls on Member States to support this development;
86. meni, da je treba najti sinergijo med programi, namenjenimi spodbujanju prostega gibanja študentov, oseb, ki se poklicno usposabljajo, in pripravnikov, ter programi, ki so namenjeni izključno spodbujanju prostega gibanja delavcev;
Takes the view that a better synergy must be found between programmes aimed at encouraging the free movement of students, persons undergoing vocational training and trainees and programmes specifically aimed at fostering the free movement of workers;
Vprašanje migracij delovne sile znotraj EU se je dolgo časa obravnavalo kot morebitna težava, ki na nacionalni ravni prispeva k neravnovesju zaradi pomanjkanja ponudbe delovne sile, v državah gostiteljicah pa vpliva na kolektivna pogajanja in plače.
The issue of labour migration within the EU has long been perceived as a potential problem for disbalances at national level in terms of shortages of labour supply as well as affected collective bargaining and wages within host countries.
Čeprav je bilo „prosto gibanje delavcev“ v Pogodbah prisotno kot jamstvo za dokončanje enotnega trga in za okrepitev prave evropske identitete, je bila državam članicam podeljena pravica do ohranitve začasnih ovir v prehodnih obdobjih kar zadeva odpiranje trga delovne sile za nove države članice.
Although the notion of ‘free movement of workers’ has been present in the Treaties as a guarantee for the completion of the Single market, and for the strengthening of a true European Identity, Member States have been granted the right to maintain provisional barriers for transitional periods in terms of opening the labour market for new Member States.
Z zgodovinskega vidika se je strah vedno osredotočal na dva glavna vidika: na prihod številnih priseljencev iz revnejših v uspešnejše države in izgubo delovnih mest za državljane držav gostiteljic ali, v boljšem primeru, na znižanje ravni plač.
Historically, the fear has been always focused on two main aspects: numerous inflows of immigrants from poorer countries coming into the more prosperous ones and losses of jobs for the nationals of the host countries, or in the better scenario a drop in the level of salaries.
Vendar pa nedavne raziskave kažejo, da so ti strahovi neutemeljeni in da so, ravno nasprotno, delovne migracije imele koristne učinke na celotno EU.
However, recent studies have shown that these fears have never been met and on the contrary, labour migration registered a beneficial effect for the EU as a whole.
Razloge za takšne rezultate gre iskati v naravnem približevanju povpraševanja in ponudbe delovne sile, ki je jasno pokazalo, da so določena delovna mesta, ki jih državljani niso iskali, zapolnili delavci migranti.
The motivation behind this outcome is due to a natural convergence of labour demand and supply that explained that certain jobs were not requested by nationals and were taken by migrant workers.
V tem primeru je bila dodana vrednost za neto blaginjo v EU jasna, saj v državah članicah ni bilo nobenih prostih delovnih mest in padcev stopenj produktivnosti, obenem pa so delavci, ki so svoje storitve opravljali v drugi državi članici, prejemali boljše osebne dohodke.
In this case, the added value brought to the net welfare of the EU was clear as there were no vacancies and drops in productivity rates in the Member States as well as an upgrading income for the workers that chose another Member State to provide their services.
Poleg tega se je zmanjšala raven nezakonitih delovnih migracij, saj ni bilo nikakršnih spodbud za izigravanje zakonodaje, po drugi strani pa smo bili priča jasnim znakom vključevanja delavcev v gostiteljske družbe.
Furthermore, the illegal labour migration decreased as there were no incentives to fraud the law and there were clear signs of integration trends within the host societies.
Kljub temu da so bili koristni učinki delovne migracije očitni, pa je v razpravi o prostem gibanju delavcev vseeno treba obravnavati nekaj vprašanj.
Nevertheless, although the beneficial aspects of labour migration were observed, there are few issues that one has to consider when talking about free movement of workers.
Podatki iz leta 2008 kažejo, da 2,3 % državljanov EU (11,3 milijona oseb) prebiva v državi članici, ki ni država, katere državljani so, še precej več pa jih to pravico uveljavlja v določenem obdobju svojega življenja.
Data produced in 2008 points out that 2.3% of EU citizens (11.3 million persons) reside in a Member State other than the state of which they are a citizen, and many more exercise this right at some point in their life.
Glede na podatke iz nedavne raziskave Eurobarometra je 10 % anketiranih v 27 državah EU odgovorilo, da so v preteklosti živeli in delali v drugi državi, medtem ko namerava 17 % anketiranih pravico do prostega gibanja uveljaviti v prihodnje.
According to a recent Eurobarometer survey, 10% of persons polled in EU-27 replied that they had lived and worked in another country at some point in the past, while 17% intended to take advantage of free movement in the future.
To dokazuje, da migracijski tok delavcev ni prispeval k izjemno visokim številkam, saj menjava delovnega mesta v novi državi od delavcev zahteva, da se soočijo z dodatnimi ukrepi.
This indicates that the migration flux of workers did not account to extremely high digits, as moving jobs within a new country require additional measures that workers need to address.
V praksi se to kaže v težavah, povezanih s spremembo kulturnega okolja, prilagajanjem novim jezikom, odtujenostjo od družine, pa tudi drugimi ovirami, ki onemogočajo polno uveljavljanje pravice do prostega gibanja.
Going further into details, this would translate into problems related to changing cultures, adjusting to new languages, alienation from the families, to which there are also other barriers related to enjoying the full exercise of free movement.
V tem okviru je Evropska komisija predstavila svoje sporočilo z naslovom „Ponovna potrditev prostega gibanja delavcev: pravice in pomembne spremembe“, v katerem je zelo jasno prikazala trenutno stanje.
On this token, the European Commission has presented the Communication ‘Reaffirming the free movement of workers: rights and major developments’ in which there is a very clear view about the current state of play.
Glede na ugotovitve, ki izhajajo iz zadnjega sporočila Evropske komisije, se je poročevalec osredotočil na sredstva in strategije, ki lahko to stanje izboljšajo in ponovno potrdijo evropsko zavzemanje za krepitev pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev.
Given the findings derived from the last communication presented by the European Commission, the Rapporteur has focused its attention on means and strategies that can ameliorate the situation and reaffirm the European commitment towards reinforcing the right of free movement of workers.
Glavno vodilo pristopa, ki ga je treba zavzeti na evropski ravni, je dejstvo, da je prosto gibanje delavcev pravica, ki jo imajo državljani, in da uveljavljanje te pravice ni privedlo do nikakršnih negativnih učinkov na trgih delovne sile.
The stepping stone regarding the approach that needs to be taken at European level is that free movement of workers is a right that citizens have and that by exercising this right there are no negative effects registered on the labour markets.
Prav zato imajo države članice skupaj s svojimi lokalnimi in regionalnimi organi ključno vlogo pri lajšanju uveljavljanja te pravice, veljavno zakonodajo pa je treba ustrezno in v celoti izvajati.
Consequently, the Member States together with their local and regional authorities play a crucial role in facilitating the execution of this right and that existing legislation needs to be implemented correctly and fully.
Poleg tega obstaja tudi velika potreba po sodelovanju pri vzpostavljanju povezave med nacionalnimi zakonodajami in evropskim pravom, da bi zagotovili odpravo morebitnih neposrednih in posrednih ovir, predvsem pa tistih, ki so povezane z diskriminatorno obravnavo na podlagi državljanstva, zavračanjem podeljevanja pravic za družinske člane, programi socialne varnosti in drugimi ovirami, ki lahko preprečijo ali omejijo prosto gibanje delavcem, ki iščejo zaposlitev.
Furthermore, there is a high need of cooperation regarding bridging the national legislations with the European ones in order to assure the ban of possible direct or indirect barriers, especially the ones related to discrimination behaviour based on nationality, refusal for granting the rights for family members, social security schemes and other barriers that can prevent or provide disincentives for workers to move freely in search of a job.
Ukrepi, predlagani v tem poročilu, so strukturirani tako, da odpravljajo glavne težave, ki so se pokazale med obravnavo pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev.
The actions proposed in the report are structured in such a way that they tackle the main problems seen when the right of free movement of workers is taken into discussion.
Ker sprememba delovnega mesta in države ne zadeva le določb, ki izhajajo iz politik trga dela, je najprej treba sprejeti naslednje ukrepe: približevanje in usklajevanje z drugimi veljavnimi politikami in strategijami za lajšanje prehoda delavcev v državo gostiteljico.
As changing jobs and countries does not reflect only upon the provisions contained into labour policies, the first actions needed are: a convergence with other existing policies and strategies in order to facilitate workers’ transition to the host state.
To vključuje tudi ukrepe, ki so bili sprejeti na področju dokončanja notranjega trga, usklajevanja sistemov socialne varnosti, pravic iz dodatnega pokojninskega zavarovanja, zaščite delavcev, izobraževanja in poklicnega usposabljanja, jezikovnih zahtev, davčnih ukrepov, podobnih tistim za preprečevanje dvojne obdavčitve, in politik za boj proti diskriminaciji.
These include the measures taken in the field of completion of the internal market, coordination of social security systems, supplementary pension rights, protection of workers, education and vocational training, languages requirements, tax measures such as those designed to avoid double taxation, and anti-discrimination policies.
Poleg tega so določbe, ki se nanašajo na pravice družinskih članov, prav tako pomembne kot tiste, ki so neposredno povezane z iskalci zaposlitve, saj bi odrekanje teh pravic lahko privedlo do novih ovir pri iskanju zaposlitve v drugi državi članici.
Furthermore, the provisions related to the rights of family members are as important as the ones directly linked to the persons in search of a job, as denial of those rights may lead to new disincentives for pursuing a job in a different member State.
Drugič, obstaja jasna potreba po uskladitvi učinkov delovne migracije z obstoječimi strategijami na evropski ravni, predvsem s strategijo EU 2020, pa tudi s krepitvijo vloge malih in srednje velikih podjetij.
Secondly, there is a clear need to match the effects of labour migration with the existing strategies at European level, especially the EU 2020 as well as with the strengthening the role of SMEs.
Na tem področju je vključevanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij bistvenega pomena.
Engaging the SMEs into the matter is of crucial importance.
Njihov razvoj bo namreč prispeval k večjemu številu delovnih mest, njihovo dinamično obnašanje pa lahko zagotovi ciklične migracije delavcev, ki bodo sčasoma prevzeli željo po nadgradnji svojih znanj in spretnosti s pomočjo aktivnega učenja ali prek napredovanja, ter ohranjanje konkurenčnega okolja, ki bo prispevalo k boljšim končnim proizvodom.
Their development will grant more jobs and their dynamic behaviour can provide for a cyclic migration of workers which ultimately will reside in upgrading the skills through learning by doing or stepping on shoulders effect as well as maintaining a competitive environment that will lead to better final products.
Trenutno stanje in izkušnje, pridobljene med finančno krizo, so prispevale k novemu naboru možnosti za ponovni zagon gospodarske uspešnosti in povečanje stopenj zaposlenosti.
The current situation and the lessons learnt form the financial crisis have brought up a new spectrum of possibilities to reboost economic performance and increase employment rates.
Zato so koristi, ki izhajajo iz mobilnosti delovne sile, izredno pomembne, saj bodo prispevale k socialno-ekonomski usklajenosti ter k nadaljevanju sodelovanja, ki koristi tako delodajalcem kot delavcem.
To this aim, the gain from labour mobility is of high importance as it will produce more socio-economic convergence as well as continuous shared experience beneficial for both employers and employees.
Poleg tega ne smemo pozabiti, da bo polno izvajanje mobilnosti delovne sile prispevalo k lažjemu doseganju cilja na področju ustvarjanja novih delovnih mest.
Not to mention that the job creation target will be better matched if labour mobility is fully implemented.
Tretjič, poročevalec se osredotoča tudi na pomen obveščanja in znanja.
Thirdly, the rapporteur is focusing on the importance of information and knowledge.
Skupni trend, ki smo mu priča v večini držav članic, je povezan z nezadovoljivo ravnijo sedanjega obveščanja glede pravic in dolžnosti, ki jih morajo državljani poznati.
A common trend observed in the majority of the Member States is related to the unsatisfactory level of existing information related to rights and obligations that citizens need to know.
Mobilnost delovne sile je treba spodbujati v večji meri, informacije pa morajo biti dostopne vsem, ki jih to zadeva.
Labour mobility needs to be better promoted and the information has to be very accessible to all persons concerned.
V tem okviru je vloga evropskih institucij in nacionalnih vlad odločilnega pomena, saj je treba izboljšati njihovo sodelovanje in odpraviti neskladja med posredovanimi informacijami.
In this regard, the role of the European Institutions and national governments is decisive as they need to collaborate and avoid situations of asymmetry of information.
Glede na to da je prišlo do sprememb v sestavi delovnih mest, potrebe po nadgradnji znanj in spretnosti ter večji vlogi izobraževanja ni mogoče več spregledati.
As the job composition showed a changing trend, the need of upgrading skills and emphasising the role of education cannot be overlooked.
Prav zato poročevalec zavzema jasno stališče glede tega, da je treba okrepiti prizadevanja za vse vrste izobraževalnih programov, katerih cilj je pridobivanje delovne sile, ki se bo lahko odzivala na potrebe in izzive prihodnosti.
Consequently, the rapporteur takes a clear stand with respect to engaging more efforts into all sorts of education programs with the clear aim of obtaining working force able to respond to the needs and challenges of the future.
V tem okviru je usklajevanje med politikami na področju izobraževanja in hitrejše priznavanje diplom bistvenega pomena za izboljšanje poenotenega razumevanja glede tega, kako delovno aktivno prebivalstvo pripraviti na spremembe in konkurenčne pritiske, ki izhajajo iz trga dela.
In this respect, coordination between education policies and speeding up of diploma recognition are highlighted to raise the prospects of a unitary understanding of how we need to prepare the active population for the changes and competitive pressures coming from the market.
Glavno sporočilo tega poročila je naslednje: glede na to da nismo zabeležili nikakršnih negativnih učinkov mobilnosti delovne sile, še zlasti pa ne po širitvenih valih v letih 2004 in 2007, ni nikakršnih socialno-ekonomskih razlogov za ohranjanje ovir za vstop na nove trge delovne sile, predvsem za državljane Romunije in Bolgarije.
The main message of the report states that as long as there are no negative effects registered from labour mobility especially after the integration waves of 2004 and 2007, there is no socio-economic rationale to maintain the barriers for entry into a new job market, especially in the case of Romanian and Bulgarian citizens.
Nacionalne politike je treba približati evropskim strategijam, da bi lahko uresničili pričakovane ravni blaginje in napredka.
National policies need to be brought closer to the European Strategies in order to perform to the expected level in terms of welfare and progress.
Poleg tega lahko v obdobju globaliziranih trgov in demografskih sprememb prav prosto gibanje delavcev prispeva k rešitvam na področju ustreznega usklajevanja med povpraševanjem in ponudbo delovne sile.
Furthermore, in an era of globalized markets and demographic changes free movement of workers can address the problem of a profitable match between labour demand and supply.
Da bi takšno stanje dosegli, se je treba osredotočiti na izvajanje veljavne zakonodaje in uporabo obstoječih pravil, pa tudi na spodbujanje usklajenega ukrepanja na področju priznavanja diplom in razvoja bodočih izobraževalnih sistemov, s katerimi bi se odzvali na potrebe trga in ohranili visoko raven konkurenčne prednosti, povezane z znanji in spretnostmi, ter ostalih pravic, ki jih uveljavljajo delavci, če želijo prebivati in opravljati svoje delo v novi državi.
For obtaining such a desiderate, the focus has to be on implementing the existing legislation and applying the rules as well as promoting coordinated actions in terms of diploma recognition, development of future educational systems in order to respond to the needs of the market and maintain a high level of competitive advantages related to skills as well as other rights that workers need to exercise in order to be able to reside and perform their duties in a new country.
Vsi nepotrebni upravni postopki, ki lahko podaljšajo ali preprečijo uveljavljanje pravice do prostega gibanja delavcev, so neutemeljeni in jih je treba nemudoma odpraviti, saj predstavljajo breme, ki z gospodarskega ali socialnega vidika ni upravičeno.
All unnecessary administrative procedures that can delay or prevent the exercise of free movement of workers is regarded as unjustified and calls for immediate remedy, as it represents a burden with no economic or social justifications.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da je temeljito poznavanje trenutnega stanja in bodočih sprememb na trgih delovne sile mogoče doseči le, če prizadevanja Evropske komisije na področju izvrševanja in spodbujanja mobilnosti delovne sile še dodatno okrepimo in opravimo tudi poglobljeno analizo glede postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev zoper države članice, ki svojih obveznosti ne izpolnjujejo, gibanj na področju mobilnosti delovne sile z vidika znanj in spretnosti, gospodarskih panog in geografskih območij ter oblikujemo dolgoročno, celovito in multidisciplinarno strategijo mobilnosti, s katero bi analizirali in odpravili vse obstoječe pravne, upravne in praktične ovire prostega gibanja delavcev.
In order to have a thorough understanding of the current situation as well as of future developments in the labour markets the rapporteur is convinced that the good efforts of the European Commission taken with respect to enforcing and supporting labour mobility need to be strengthened and more in-depth analysis is required with respect to infringement procedures targeted towards the non-compliant member states, trends of labour mobility in terms of skills, sectors and geographical area, and to present a long-term, comprehensive, multidisciplinary, mobility strategy aimed at analysing and removing all existing legal, administrative and practical barriers to free movement of workers.
Gospodarski razlogi za odpiranje trgov delovne sile so v današnji časih bolj jasni kot kdajkoli prej.
The economic reasoning for opening the labour markets becomes as clear as ever in the current times.
Previsoka raven protekcionizma na področju mobilnosti delovne sile bo dodatno spodbudila vedno večje razlike med državami članicami in okrepila nezaupanje, kar lahko negativno vpliva na uspešnost EU kot globalnega akterja in oslabi njeno vlogo na lestvici konkurenčnosti.
Over protectionism in terms of labour mobility will induce a growing separation among Member States and a mistrust that can affect EU’s performance as a world player and can weaken its position on a competitive scale.
Pripravljavka mnenja: Vilija Blinkevičiūtė
Rapporteur: Vilija Blinkevičiūtė
– ob upoštevanju odstavka I(g) Evropskega pakta o priseljevanju in azilu
– having regard to paragraph I(g), of the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum
Sveta 13440/08. , ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet, v katerem poziva države članice, naj z ambicioznimi ukrepi spodbujajo usklajeno integracijo zakonitih priseljencev, vključno s posebnimi ukrepi za spodbujanje učenja jezikov in dostopa do zaposlovanja,
13440/08. adopted by the European Council, which invites Member States to establish ambitious policies to promote the harmonious integration of legal immigrants, including specific measures to promote language-learning and access to employment,
A. ker je treba mobilnost delavcev v EU spodbujati po vsej EU, kjerkoli obstaja potreba po zaposlovanju,
A. whereas mobility of EU workers should be encouraged throughout the European Union where there is an employment need,
B. ker lahko delavci v EU naletijo na težave in izzive pri iskanju zaposlitve v državi gostiteljici,
B. whereas EU workers can face difficulties and challenges when seeking employment in a host Member State,
2. meni, da bi morali biti delavci migranti sposobni komunicirati v enem od uradnih jezikov države članice gostiteljice, da bi se lahko integrirali in zagotovili optimalno produktivnost na delu, ter ugotavlja, da bi morale države članice imeti pravico, da določijo potrebno raven poznavanja jezika za določena strokovna in tehnična delovna mesta; zato meni, da bi morali biti za delavce migrante na voljo brezplačni tečaji za učenje jezika države članice gostiteljice; obžaluje pa, da politike nekaterih držav članic pogojujejo dostop delavcev EU do storitev socialne varnosti in socialnih storitev z znanjem jezika države članice gostiteljice;
Considers that migrant workers should be able to communicate in one of the official languages of their host Member State in order to enable their integration and to obtain optimal productivity at work and states that Member States should have the right to establish linguistic competences for certain professional and technical jobs; considers therefore that classes in languages of the host Member State should be made available free of charge to migrant workers; deplores, however, the policies of Member States aimed at limiting the access of EU workers to social security or social services by making it conditional on the requirement to know the language of the host Member State;
5. poziva države članice, naj v celoti izvajajo Direktivo 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev
Calls on the Member States to fully implement Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services
UL L 18, 21.01.97, str.
OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p.