natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja pomen pravične trgovine v prizadevanjih za izkoreninjenje revščine na podeželju ter poziva Komisijo, da na konkreten način uresniči obljube o višji tehnični in proračunski pomoči za proizvajalce, ki sodelujejo v pravični trgovini, in za njihove distributerje v državah EU;
Underlines the importance of fair trade in working towards poverty eradication in rural areas and urges the Commission to carry-out concrete follow-up on pledges to give more technical and budgetary support for fair trade producers and their distributors in EU countries;
poudarja, da države v razvoju in najmanj razvite države zahtevajo, da neprekinjena asimetrična obravnava v STO upošteva njihov relativno šibek položaj v sistemu mednarodne trgovine;
Emphasizes that developing and least-developed countries require continuing asymmetric treatment in the WTO to take account of their relatively weak position in the international trading system;
poudarja, da socialna razsežnost globalizacije zagovarja reformo režima STO; nadalje poudarja, da je sporazume STO treba vrednotiti ob upoštevanju njihovih gospodarskih, socialnih in okoljskih posledic ter da je teste "nujnosti" iz Sporazuma o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini in drugih sporazumih treba nadomestiti s testi "trajnosti";
Stresses that the social dimension of globalisation argues for a reform of the WTO regime; stresses further that WTO agreements must be evaluated in the light of their economic, social and environmental impact, and that the 'necessity' tests in the Technical Barriers to Trade and other Agreements need to be replaced by 'sustainability' tests;
poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti smiseln demokratičen nadzor nad STO, kar pomeni pristen zakonski nadzor s strani izvoljenih predstavnikov ali parlamentov;
Stresses that meaningful democratic control of the WTO must be established, which implies genuine legislative scrutiny by elected representatives or parliaments;
poudarja, da je za podpiranje socialnega razvoja v tretjem svetu nujno potrebna okrepljena Organizacija združenih narodov; zato spodbuja države članice, da podprejo trenutna prizadevanja za reformo OZN; poudarja, da je potreben nov in okrepljen Ekonomsko-socialni svet (ESS) – najprimernejši v obliki Sveta za človekov razvoj, ki bi bil pristojen za koordinacijo dela Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, Svetovne banke, STO, Mednarodne organizacije dela ter Programa ZN za razvoj (UNDP) in Programa Združenih narodov za okolje (UNEP) - da se zagotovi usklajenost politik, ki je potrebna za doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, in da globalizacija na splošno postane vzvod družbenega napredka;
Emphasises that, to underpin social progress in the third world, a strengthened United Nations is indispensable; therefore encourages the Member States to support the ongoing work on reform of the UN; stresses that a new and strengthened UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) – ideally, reconstituted as a Council for Human Development with the power to coordinate the work of the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO, and the ILO, as well as the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) – is necessary to secure the policy coherence needed to achieve the MDGs and, more generally, to ensure that globalisation functions as a lever for social progress;
se strinja s Svetovno komisijo za socialno razsežnost globalizacije, da bi bilo treba parlamentarni nadzor nad večstranskim sistemom postopoma razširiti; pozdravlja predlog o ustanovitvi parlamentarne skupine, ki bi se ukvarjala s skladnostjo in doslednostjo globalne gospodarske, socialne in okoljske politike ter razvila celosten nadzor nad najpomembnejšimi mednarodnimi organizacijami; meni, da je to priložnost, da Evropski parlament sodeluje v parlamentarni skupini in prispeva k čim večji koristi globalizacije za vse družbene skupine;
Agrees with the WCSDG that parliamentary oversight of the multilateral system should be progressively expanded; welcomes the proposal for a Parliamentary Group concerned with coherence and consistency between global economic, social and environmental policies, which should develop integrated oversight of major international organisations; regards this as an opportunity for the European Parliament to become involved in the Parliamentary Group and to contribute to maximising the benefits of globalisation for all social groups;
se strinja s Komisijo, da lahko zasebni sektor in zasebne pobude ter ustanovitev in vključitev skupin s skupnim interesom in globalni ukrepi različnih socialnih organov (na primer NVO), bistveno prispevajo k spodbujanju dobrega socialnega upravljanja; pozdravlja podporo Komisije smernicam OECD za večnacionalna podjetja, ki predstavljajo merilo uspešnosti odgovornega poslovnega ravnanja; podpira predlog Komisije o okrepljenem izvajanju smernic z vključitvijo sklicevanj nanje v dvostranske sporazume; se strinja s Komisijo, da je potrebno strožje in dosledno izvajanje teh smernic; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z ozaveščanjem o dobri praksi, obstoječih instrumentih in sredstvih, kakor so smernice OECD;
Agrees with the Commission that the private sector and private initiatives, the formation and mobilisation of joint interest groups and global measures by various social bodies (for example NGOs) can make an important contribution to promoting good social governance; welcomes the Commission's support for the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises which set benchmarks for responsible business conduct; supports the Commission's proposal to increase implementation of the Guidelines by building references into bilateral agreements; agrees with the Commission that implementation of the Guidelines must be more rigorous and consistent; calls on the Commission to continue to raise awareness of good practice, existing instruments and tools such as the OECD Guidelines;
meni, da majhna in srednje velika podjetja ne smejo biti zapostavljena pri aktivnem sodelovanju v globaliziranem gospodarstvu in skladno s tem poziva Komisijo, da poskrbi za spodbujanje mrežnega delovanja takšnih podjetij; nadalje poziva k prilagoditvi statuta evropske družbe in zadrug, kar bi podjetjem te vrste omogočilo polno udeležbo v globaliziranem gospodarstvu;
Takes the view that small and medium-sized undertakings cannot be sidelined from active participation in the globalised economy and accordingly urges the Commission to provide incentives for the networking of such undertakings; calls in addition for European company and cooperative statutes to be adjusted to enable undertakings of this type to participate fully in the globalised economy;
ugotavlja, da Svetovna komisija za socialno razsežnost globalizacije priporoča, naj ILO glede socialne odgovornosti podjetij skliče globalni forum vseh zainteresiranih strani; opozarja, da Svetovna komisija za socialno razsežnost globalizacije priznava, da se pojavlja dvom v resnični vpliv sistemov socialne odgovornosti podjetij; predlaga, naj Komisija izvede še več dejavnosti ozaveščanja za spodbujanje socialne odgovornosti podjetij;
Notes that the WCSDG recommends that the ILO convene a global multistakeholder forum on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR); notes that the WCSDG acknowledges that there is scepticism about the real impact of CSR schemes; suggests that the Commission undertake further awareness-raising activities to promote the business case for CSR;
meni, da je treba jasno določiti socialno in okoljsko odgovornost večnacionalnih družb ter da bi bilo potrebno okrepiti delovanje EU na tem področju; meni, da je rok za konkretno nadaljnje ukrepanje začetega dela večstranskega evropskega foruma o socialni odgovornosti podjetij že potekel in poziva Komisijo, da objavi svoje sporočilo;
Considers that the social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals should be clearly established, and that EU action in this area should be stepped up; believes that concrete follow-up to the work of the Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR is long overdue and calls on the Commission to publish its communication;
podpira prizadevanja Komisije za dvig ozaveščenosti večnacionalnih podjetij v zvezi z njihovo socialno odgovornostjo, ki so doslej imela le omejeni učinek;
Supports the Commission's efforts to raise awareness among multinational companies of their social responsibility, which have as yet had limited effect;
poziva Komisijo, da predloži predlog o socialnem označevanju, ki temelji na merilih, kot so skladnost s človekovimi pravicami in pravicami sindikatov, delovno okolje, usposabljanje in razvoj zaposlenih, enako obravnavanje ter socialna in etična obravnava zaposlenih in prebivalcev sosednjih skupnosti;
Invites the Commission to put forward a proposal on social labelling, based on criteria such as compliance with human and trades union rights, the working environment, training and development of employees, equal treatment and social and ethical consideration for employees and citizens in the surrounding community;
ugotavlja, da so nacionalne migracijske politike vedno bolj oblikovane tako, da ustrezajo potrebam domačih trgov dela; vztraja, da morajo migracijske politike temeljiti na Mednarodni konvenciji o zaščiti pravic vseh delavcev migrantov in članov njihovih družin;
Notes that national migration policies are increasingly designed to meet the needs of domestic labour markets; insists that migration policies must be based on the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families;
ugotavlja, da je preseljevanje pomembna, ampak tudi občutljiva tema v razpravah o globalizaciji, ki jo je mogoče razrešiti šele, ko se bodo države članice sporazumele o skupnem postopku za priznavanje in vključevanje;
Notes that migration is an important but also a sensitive topic in the debate on globalisation, which can only be resolved once the Member States have agreed on a common recognition and integration procedure;
poudarja, da je treba ljudi bolje obveščati tako o koristih kakor tudi o izzivih globalizacije in v tej zvezi poudarja pomen izobraževalnih ustanov in sredstev javnega obveščanja;
Highlights the need to ensure that people are better informed about both the benefits and the challenges of globalisation and stresses the importance of educational institutions and the media in this regard;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da vložita potrebna sredstva in naložbe v spodbujanje zgoraj navedenega procesa;
Urges the Council and Commission to put the necessary resources and investments into promoting the above processes;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic, držav pristopnic in držav kandidatk.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and accession and candidate countries.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o informiranju potnikov v zračnem prometu o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki opravlja let, in o sporočanju varnostnih informacij držav članic ( KOM(2005)0048 – C6-0046/2005 – 2005/0008(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the information of air transport passengers on the identity of the operating carrier and on communication of safety information by Member States ( COM(2005)0048 – C6-0046/2005 – 2005/0008(COD) )
(Postopek soodločanja: prva obravnava)
(Codecision procedure, first reading)
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0048 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0048 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 80(2) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0046/2005 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0046/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0310/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0310/2005 ),
(Besedilo velja za EGP)
(Texte présentant de l'intérêt pour l'EEE)
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora Mnenje z dne 28. septembra 2005 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu).
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee Opinion of 28 September 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal)
v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. novembra 2005.
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty Opinion of the European Parliament of 16 November 2005 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and Council decision of ……… .
Dejavnost Skupnosti na področju zračnega prometa bi morala biti prednostno usmerjena k zagotavljanju visoke ravni zaščite potnikov pred varnostnimi tveganji.
Action by the Community in the field of air transport should aim, as a priority, at ensuring a high level of protection for passengers from safety risks.
Poleg tega bi bilo v celoti treba upoštevati tudi zahteve varstva potrošnikov na splošno.
Moreover, full account should be taken of the requirements of consumer protection in general.
Za čim večjo preglednost bi bilo treba potnike seznaniti s seznamom Skupnosti o letalskih prevoznikih, ki ne ustrezajo varnostnim zahtevam.
A Community list of air carriers that do not meet relevant safety requirements should be brought to the notice of passengers so as to ensure the utmost transparency.
Seznam Skupnosti bi moral temeljiti na skupnih merilih, oblikovanih na ravni Skupnosti.
This Community list should be based on common criteria drawn up at Community level.
Za letalske prevoznike, vključene v seznam Skupnosti, bi morala veljati prepoved opravljanja letov.
Air carriers included in the Community list should be subject to an operating ban.
Prepovedi opravljanja letov, vključene v seznam Skupnosti, bi se morale uporabljati na celotnem ozemlju držav članic, za katerega se uporablja Pogodba.
The operating bans included in the Community list should apply throughout the territory of the Member States to which the Treaty applies.
Letalski prevozniki, ki nimajo prometnih pravic v eni državi članici ali več državah članicah, lahko kljub temu opravljajo lete v Skupnost in iz nje, če njihov zrakoplov z ali brez posadke zakupijo družbe, ki te pravice imajo.
Air carriers that do not enjoy traffic rights in one or more of the Member States may nonetheless fly to and from the Community when their aircraft, with or without crew, are leased by companies that do enjoy such rights.
Treba bi bilo sprejeti določbo, na podlagi katere se prepoved opravljanja letov na seznamu Skupnosti uporablja tudi za takšne letalske prevoznike, saj bi ti sicer lahko opravljali lete v Skupnosti, ne da bi spoštovali ustrezne varnostne standarde.
Provision should be made for an operating ban included in the Community list to apply equally to such air carriers, since these air carriers could otherwise operate in the Community while not complying with the relevant safety standards.
Letalski prevoznik, za katerega velja prepoved opravljanja letov, lahko izvaja prometne pravice, če uporablja zrakoplov s posadko (wet lease) letalskega prevoznika, za katerega ne velja prepoved opravljanja letov, pod pogojem, da se spoštujejo ustrezni varnostni standardi.
An air carrier which is subject to an operating ban could be permitted to exercise traffic rights by using wet-leased aircraft of an air carrier which is not subject to an operating ban, provided that the relevant safety standards are complied with.
Postopek za posodabljanje seznama Skupnosti bi moral omogočiti hitro sprejemanje odločitev, da se zagotovijo ustrezne in najnovejše varnostne informacije letalskim potnikom ter da se zajamči, da so letalski prevozniki, ki so odpravili pomanjkljivosti glede varnosti, čim prej črtani s seznama.
The procedure for updating the Community list should allow for decisions to be taken swiftly, in order to provide adequate and up-to-date safety information to air passengers and to guarantee that air carriers that have remedied safety deficiencies are taken off the list as soon as possible.
Postopki bi morali obenem spoštovati pravico letalskega prevoznika do obrambe in ne bi smeli posegati v mednarodne sporazume in konvencije, katerih pogodbenice so države članice ali Skupnost, zlasti v Čikaško konvencijo o mednarodnem civilnem letalstvu iz leta 1944.
At the same time, the procedures should respect the air carrier's rights of defence and should be without prejudice to international agreements and conventions to which the Member States or the Community are parties, in particular the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation.
Izvedbeni ukrepi v zvezi s postopki, ki jih bo sprejela Komisija, bi morali posebej predvideti te zahteve.
The implementing measures on matters of procedure, to be adopted by the Commission, should notably cater for these requirements.
Ko se letalskemu prevozniku naloži prepoved opravljanja letov, bi bilo treba sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za pomoč temu letalskemu prevozniku pri odpravljanju pomanjkljivosti, ki so vzrok za prepoved.
When an operating ban has been imposed on an air carrier, appropriate action should be taken with a view to assisting that air carrier in remedying the deficiencies that gave rise to that ban.
V nujnih primerih bi moralo biti državam članicam dovoljeno, da sprejmejo enostranske ukrepe.
In exceptional cases, Member States should be allowed to take unilateral measures.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost v nujnem primeru in primeru nepredvidene varnostne težave nemudoma naložiti prepoved opravljanja letov na svojem ozemlju.
In cases of urgency and when confronted with an unforeseen safety problem, Member States should have the possibility to impose immediately an operating ban in respect of their own territory.
Poleg tega, če je Komisija sklenila, da ne vključi letalskega prevoznika v seznam Skupnosti, bi morale države članice imeti možnost naložiti ali ohraniti prepoved opravljanja letov zaradi varnostne težave, ki ne obstaja v drugih državah članicah.
Moreover, where the Commission has decided not to include an air carrier in the Community list, Member States should also be able to impose or maintain an operating ban in view of a safety problem which does not exist in the other Member States.
Države članice bi morale uporabljati te možnosti omejeno, ob upoštevanju interesa Skupnosti in z namenom predstavitve skupnega pristopa glede varnosti v letalstvu.
Member States should make restrictive application of these possibilities, taking account of the Community interest and with a view to presenting a common approach in respect of aviation safety.
To bi se moralo uporabljati brez poseganja v člen 8 Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 3922/91 z dne 16. decembra 1991 o uskladitvi tehničnih predpisov in upravnih postopkov na področju civilnega letalstva UL L 373, 31.12.1991, str.
This should be without prejudice to Article 8 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91of 16 December 1991 on the harmonization of technical requirements and administrative procedures in the field of civil aviation OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 2871/2000 (UL L 333, 29.12.2000, str.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2871/2000 (OJ L 333, 29.12.2000, p.
Zagotoviti bi bilo treba učinkovito objavo informacij o varnosti letalskih prevoznikov, na primer z uporabo interneta.
Information on the safety of air carriers should be published in an effective manner, such as through use of the Internet.
Da bi konkurenčni okvir v zračnem prometu prinesel čim večje koristi podjetjem in potnikom, je pomembno, da potrošniki prejmejo potrebne informacije, na podlagi katerih lahko informirano izbirajo.
In order for the competitive framework in air transport to yield the greatest possible benefits for companies and passengers, it is important that consumers receive the necessary information to be able to make informed choices.
Identiteta letalskega prevoznika ali prevoznikov, ki storitev dejansko opravljajo, je bistvena informacija.
The identity of the air carrier or carriers actually operating the flight is an essential piece of information.
Vendar pa potrošniki, ki sklenejo prevozno pogodbo, ki lahko vključuje tako enosmerni kot povratni let, niso vedno seznanjeni z identiteto letalskega prevoznika ali prevoznikov, ki bodo zadevni let ali zadevne lete dejansko opravili.
However, consumers concluding a contract of carriage, which could comprise both an outward and a return flight, are not always informed about the identity of the air carrier or carriers actually operating the flight or flights concerned.
Direktiva Sveta 90/314/EGS z dne 13. junija 1990 o paketnem potovanju, organiziranih počitnicah in izletih UL L 158, 23.6.1990, str.
Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours OJ L 158, 23.6.1990, p.
zahteva, da so nekatere informacije na voljo potrošnikom, vendar te informacije ne vključujejo identitete letalskega prevoznika, ki let opravlja.
requires certain information to be made available to consumers, but that information does not include the identity of the operating air carrier.
Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2299/89 z dne 24. julija 1989 o kodeksu poslovanja računalniških sistemov rezervacij (CRS) UL L 220, 29.7.1989, str.
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2299/89 of 24 July 1989 on a code of conduct for computer reservation systems (CRS) OJ L 220, 29.7.1989, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 323/1999 (UL L 40, 13.2.1999, str.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 323/1999 (OJ L 40, 13.2.1999, p.
daje potrošnikom, ki rezervirajo let preko računalniškega sistema rezervacij, pravico do obveščenosti o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki let opravlja.
entitles consumers booking a flight via a computer reservation system to be informed of the identity of the operating air carrier.
Vendar pa celo v rednem zračnem prevozu obstajajo poslovne prakse kot sta zakup letala s posadko vred ali skupni leti z izbranim partnerjem, če so rezervirani brez CRS, v skladu s katerimi letalski prevoznik, ki je prodal let pod svojim imenom, le-tega dejansko ne opravi in v skladu s katerimi trenutno ni zakonske pravice potnika do obveščenosti o identiteti letalskega prevoznika, ki bo let dejansko opravil.
Nevertheless, even in scheduled air transport, industry practices exist, such as wet leasing, or code-sharing if booked without a CRS, where the air carrier which has sold the flight under its name does not actually operate it and where there is currently no legal right for the passenger to be informed of the identity of the air carrier actually performing the service.
Te prakse povečujejo prilagodljivost in omogočajo boljše opravljanje storitev za potnike.
These practices increase flexibility and allow a better provision of services to passengers.
Poleg tega je določeno število sprememb v zadnjem trenutku, zlasti zaradi tehničnih razlogov, neizogibno in prispeva k varnosti v zračnem prometu.
Moreover, a certain number of last minute changes, in particular for technical reasons, is unavoidable and contributes to the safety of air transport.
Vendar bi morala biti ta prilagodljivost uravnotežena s preverjanjem, da družbe, ki dejansko opravljajo letalski prevoz, izpolnjujejo varnostne zahteve, in s preglednostjo za potrošnike, da se jim zagotovi pravica do informirane izbire.
This flexibility should, however, be balanced by verification that the companies actually operating the flights meet safety requirements and by transparency for consumers in order to guarantee them the right of making an informed choice.
Treba bi bilo poiskati ustrezno ravnotežje med rentabilnostjo poslovanja letalskih prevoznikov in dostopom potnikov do informacij.
A fair balance between the commercial viability of air carriers and passenger access to information should be sought.