natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker revščina in socialna izključenost kršita človekovo dostojanstvo in temeljne človekove pravice, medtem ko je temeljni cilj sistemov dohodkovne podpore rešiti ljudi iz revščine in jim omogočiti dostojno življenje, kar je zlasti pomembno za ženske, saj jih revščina bolj prizadene,
G. whereas poverty and social exclusion violate human dignity and fundamental human rights, while the key objective of income support schemes is to bring people out of poverty and enable them to live in dignity, this being especially important for women since they are worse affected by poverty;
H. ker imajo države v razvoju z manjšo neenakostjo med spoloma pogosto nižjo stopnjo revščine,
H. whereas developing countries with less gender inequality tend to have lower poverty rates;
I. ker učinek razlike v plači med spoloma na zaslužek v celotni življenjski dobi nakazuje, da bodo imele ženske nižje pokojnine, in ker so zato ženske bolj izpostavljene dolgotrajni in skrajni revščini kot moški: tveganju revščine je izpostavljenih 22 % žensk, starih 65 let ali več, v primerjavi s 16 % moških,
I. whereas the effect of the gender pay gap on lifetime earning indicates that women will have lower pensions and whereas, as a result, women are more affected than men by persistent and extreme poverty: 22 % of women aged 65 and over are at risk of poverty as compared to 16 % of men;
1. poziva Komisijo/Eurostat, naj pripravi popoln pregled stanja o revščini in socialni izključenosti ter dopolni statistične podatke s kvalitativnim in participativnim pristopom glede na spol in starost, da se izpostavi problem revščine med starejšimi ženskami; upa, da bo inštitut za enakost spolov, takoj ko bo v celoti začel delovati, prispeval k odpravi težave v zvezi z neustreznimi sistematičnimi in primerjalnimi podatki, razčlenjenimi po spolu;
Calls on the Commission/Eurostat to carry out a comprehensive analysis of poverty and social exclusion and to compile the statistics through a qualitative and participative approach broken down by gender and age, in order to highlight the problem of poverty among older women; hopes that the Institute for Gender Equality will, as soon as it is fully operational, contribute to resolving the problem of inadequate systematic and comparative data broken down by gender;
4. odločno graja dejstvo, da Evropska platforma Komisije proti revščini in socialni izključenosti povsem zanemarja vidik spola v zvezi z revščino in socialno izključenostjo;
Strongly criticises the fact that the gender aspect of poverty and social exclusion is completely ignored in the Commission’s European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion;
7. poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva Priporočilo št. 92/441/EGS
Calls on the Commission to take account of Recommendation 92/441/EEC
1 Priporočilo Sveta z dne 24. junija 1992 o skupnih merilih v zvezi z zadostnimi sredstvi in socialno pomočjo v sistemih socialne zaščite (UL L 245, 26.0 8.1992, str.
Council Recommendation of 24 June 1992 on common criteria concerning sufficient resources and social assistance in social protection systems (OJ L 245, 26.08.1992, p.
46 ). in v njem izraženo potrditev „osnovne pravice osebe do zadostnih sredstev in socialne pomoči, da lahko živi človeka dostojno življenje“, in opozarja, da je to bistvenega pomena za ženske, ter poudarja, da mora biti temeljni cilj sistemov dohodkovne podpore reševanje ljudi iz revščine in omogočanje njihovega dostojnega življenja, kar vključuje invalidske in starostne pokojnine; ob upoštevanju tega cilja priporoča, da Komisija oblikuje skupno metodo za izračun praga preživetja v smislu življenjskih stroškov („nakupovalna košarica“ blaga in storitev), da bi se lahko oprli na primerjalne meritve stopenj revščine in določili način socialnega ukrepanja, vključno s shemo minimalnega dohodka;
46 ). and its recognition of ‘the basic right of a person to sufficient resources and social assistance to live in a manner compatible with human dignity’, recalling that this is a vital issue for women, and also stressing that the key objective of income support schemes should be to bring people out of poverty and enable them to live in dignity, this including invalidity and retirement pensions which ensure such dignity; given this objective, recommends that the Commission establish a common method for calculating a subsistence threshold in cost-of-living terms (a ‘shopping basket’ of goods and services), so as to be able to draw on comparative measurements of poverty levels and determine means of social intervention, including a minimum income scheme;
11. poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo ustrezno socialno varstvo za ženske in moške, ki skrbijo za ostarele, bolne ali invalidne sorodnike, ter Komisijo, naj ohrani finančna sredstva, ki jih lahko porabijo organizacije civilne družbe za boj proti revščini žensk in za omilitev njenih učinkov;
Calls on the Member States to provide appropriate social benefits for women and men who take care of elderly, sick or disabled relatives, and on the Commission to retain the financial allocation earmarked for use by civil society organisations in fighting, and curbing the effects of, women’s poverty;
14. poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj posebno pozornost namenijo problematiki revščine med starejšimi ženskami, ki prejemajo nižje pokojnine, med drugim zaradi obdobij nezaposlenosti v svojem življenju, ko so morale skrbeti za otroke in druge vzdrževane družinske člane;
Calls on the Member States and the Commission to pay special attention to the poverty problem among older women resulting from the fact that they receive smaller pensions, which is also a consequence of unemployment periods that they have had to face in life in order to take care of their children and other dependant family members;
16. zahteva, naj se na polletni ministrski okrogli mizi 17. oktobra – na Mednarodni dan boja proti revščini – pripravi ocena z vidika spola skupaj z zadevnimi državljani in združenji, ki pomagajo najbolj prikrajšanim,, pri čemer naj se kot referenca upoštevajo najbolj revni;
Calls for the evaluation at the biannual ministerial Round Table on 17 October, the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty, to involve the citizens concerned and associations assisting the most deprived from a gender-specific perspective, taking the poorest groups as a reference;
18. meni, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti specifičnim razmeram in potrebam ranljivih skupin žensk (starejših, invalidnih, prebivalk podeželskih območij, migrantk, žrtev nasilja in trgovine z ljudmi), ki jih ogroža revščina, in razviti ukrepe politike, vezane na spol;
Suggests that particular attention should be paid to the specific situation and needs of vulnerable groups of women who are at risk of poverty (the elderly, the disabled, those living in rural areas, migrant, and victims of violence and trafficking), and that gender-specific policy measures should be developed;
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Češková, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Zita Gurmai, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kraca Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Constance Le Grip, Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Èešková, Tadeusz Cymañski, Edite Estrela, Ilda Figueiredo, Zita Gurmai, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Constance Le Grip, Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis, Anna Záborská
Lena Ek, Sylvie Guillaume, Mojca Kleva, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Katarína Neveďalová, Norica Nicolai, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Licia Ronzulli
Lena Ek, Sylvie Guillaume, Mojca Kleva, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Katarína Neveïalová, Norica Nicolai, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Licia Ronzulli
o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
– ob upoštevanju členov 14 in 106 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter priloženega Protokola št. 26,
– having regard to Articles 14 and 106 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to Protocol No 26 thereto,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. marca 2011 o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena ( KOM(2011)0146 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 23 March 2011 on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest ( COM(2011)0146 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 23. marca 2011 o uporabi pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena od leta 2005 in izidih javnega posvetovanja ( SEC(2011)0397 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working document of 23 March 2011 on the application of EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest since 2005 and the outcome of the public consultation ( SEC(2011)0397 ),
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja, ki ga je v letu 2010 organizirala Komisija, o državni pomoči in pravilih za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena,
– having regard to the public consultation organised by the Commission in 2010 on ‘state aid rules on services of general economic interest’,
– ob upoštevanju smernic z dne 7. decembra 2010 za uporabo pravil Evropske unije o državni pomoči, javnih naročilih in notranjem trgu za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, vključno s socialnimi storitvami ( SEC(2010)1545 ),
– having regard to the ‘Guide to the application of the European Union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest’ of 7 December 2010 ( SEC(2010)1545 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Komisije 2006/111/ES z dne 16. novembra 2006 o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji ter o finančni preglednosti znotraj določenih podjetij
– having regard to Commission Directive 2006/111/EC of 16 November 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings
UL L 318, 17.11.06, str.
OJ L 318, 17.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe ES za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene nekaterim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena
– having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the EC Treaty to state aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest
– ob upoštevanju Okvira skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve
– having regard to the Community framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation
UL C 297, 29.11.05, str.
OJ C 297, 29.11.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. januarja 2001 o storitvah v splošnem interesu v Evropi
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 19 January 2001 on European services of general interest
UL C 17, 19.01.01, str.
OJ C 17, 19.01.2001, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. septembra 1996 o storitvah v splošnem interesu v Evropi
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 26 September 1996 on European services of general interest
UL C 281, 26.9.1996, str.
OJ C 281, 26.9.1996, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 1. julija 2011 o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 1 July 2011 on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
UL C 259, 2.9.11, str.
OJ C 259, 2.9.2011, p.
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 15. junija 2011 o sporočilu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij o preoblikovanju pravil EU o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 15 June 2011 on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on reform of the EU state aid rules on Services of General Economic Interest
UL C 248, 25.8.2011, str.
OJ C 248, 25.8.2011, p.
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Evropskega sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi Altmark Trans GmbH in Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg proti Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH
– having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Justice of 24 July 2003 in the case of Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH
Zadeva C-280/00, [2004] PSES I-07747. ,
Case C-280/00, [2004] ECR I-07747. ,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 5. julija o prihodnosti socialnih storitev splošnega pomena
– having regard to its resolutions of 5 July 2011 on the future of social services of general interest
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0319 . , z dne 14. marca 2007 o socialnih storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropski uniji
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0319 . , of 14 March 2007 on social services of general interest in the European Union
140. , z dne 27. septembra 2006 o Beli knjigi Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena
140. , of 27 September 2006 on the Commission white paper on services of general interest
277. , z dne 14. januarja 2004 o Zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena
277. , of 14 January 2004 on the green paper on services of general interest
126. , z dne 17. oktobra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi
126. , of 17 October 2001 on the Commission communication entitled ‘Services of general interest in Europe’
27. in z dne 7. novembra 1997 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi
27. and of 7 November 1997 on the Commission communication entitled ‘Services of general interest in Europe’
UL C 371 E, 8.12.1997, str.
OJ C 371 E, 8.12.1997, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0371/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0371/2011 ),
A. ker imajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena zelo pomembno mesto v skupnih vrednotah Unije ter spodbujajo temeljne pravice, socialno, ekonomsko in teritorialno kohezijo ter imajo zato ključno vlogo v boju proti družbenim neenakostim ter v prizadevanjih za trajnostni razvoj,
A. whereas services of general economic interest (SGEI) have an important place in the shared values of the Union, and promote fundamental rights and social, economic and territorial cohesion, and are thus crucial to the fight against societal inequalities and, increasingly, also to sustainable development;
B. ker storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena bistveno prispevajo h gospodarski učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti držav članic, s čimer pa ne prispevajo samo k preprečevanju in premagovanju gospodarskih kriz, ampak tudi k skupni gospodarski blaginji;
B. whereas SGEI make a significant contribution to the Member States’ economic performance and competitiveness and thus not only help to prevent and overcome economic crises but also serve the cause of general economic well-being;
C. ker zagotavljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena podpira uspešno izvajanje strategije Evropa 2020 in ker lahko te storitve, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja, izobraževanja in socialnega vključevanja, prispevajo k uresničevanju ciljev glede rasti, tako da bo na koncu mogoče doseči zastavljeno visoko stopnjo produktivnosti, zaposlenosti in socialne kohezije;
C. whereas the successful implementation of the Europe 2020 strategy is bolstered by the provision of SGEI, and whereas these services can help with reaching growth targets in the areas of employment, education and social integration in particular, so that in the end the high level of productivity, employment and social cohesion that has been set can be achieved;
D. ker so stroškovno učinkovite rešitve konkurenčnih zasebnih podjetij potrebne v interesu državljanov in bistvene glede na proračunski položaj;
D. whereas cost-effective solutions by competing private undertakings are necessary in the interest of the citizen and essential against the background of the budgetary situation;
E. ker so storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena storitve, ki jih brez posredovanja države ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti oziroma jih ne bi bilo mogoče zagotoviti v zadostnem obsegu;
E. whereas SGEI are services that cannot always be provided, or cannot be provided adequately, without public intervention;
F. ker imajo storitve splošnega pomena na področju socialne varnosti odločilno vlogo pri zagotavljanju temeljnih pravic in bistveno povečujejo enakost možnosti;
F. whereas social services of general interest (SSGI) play an important role in underpinning basic rights and make a major contribution to equality of opportunity;
G. ker veljavna zakonodaja EU predvideva izvzetje iz obveznosti priglasitve za bolnišnice in socialna stanovanja, tj. storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ki izpolnjujejo osnovne socialne potrebe;
G. whereas the current EU legislation provides for exemption from notification for hospitals and social housing, i.e. SGEI meeting basic social needs;
H. ker člena 106 in 107 PDEU zagotavljata pravno podlago za preoblikovanje pravil o državni pomoči za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena in člen 14 PDEU omogoča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu, da na podlagi uredb v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom določita načela in pogoje delovanja splošnih storitev gospodarskega pomena, zlasti gospodarskih in finančnih pogojev, brez poseganja v pristojnosti držav članic;
H. whereas Articles 106 and 107 TFEU provide the legal basis for the reform of state aid rules for SGEI, and Article 14 TFEU allows the European Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, to establish the principles and conditions for the operation of SGEI, particularly economic and financial conditions, without prejudice to the competences of the Member States;
I. ker je v Protokolu št. 26 PDEU določeno, da bi morala za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena veljati visoka raven kakovosti, varnosti in cenovne dostopnosti, enaka obravnava ter spodbujanje splošnega dostopa in pravic uporabnikov, ter izrecno priznava njihovo bistveno vlogo;
I. whereas Protocol No 26 TFEU establishes that SGEI should be characterised by a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and user rights, and explicitly recognises their essential role;
J. ker so države članice in njihovi javni organi v najboljšem položaju, da služijo svojim državljanom na ustrezen način in so odgovorni za natančno določitev obsega in načina zagotavljanja storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena; ker člen 1 Protokola št. 26 Lizbonske pogodbe izrecno priznava široke diskrecijske pravice za nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne organe, da jih upravljajo, naročajo in organizirajo;
J. whereas the Member States and their public authorities are in the best position to properly serve their citizens and thus are responsible for determining the precise extent and the way in which SGEI are provided, and whereas Article 1 of Protocol No 26 to the Lisbon Treaty explicitly recognises the wide discretionary powers of national, regional and local authorities to manage, commission and organise them;
K. ker nadomestila zajemajo vse ugodnosti, ki jih odobri država ali ki se odobrijo v okviru državnih sredstev v kakršni koli obliki;
K. whereas compensatory payments encompass all advantages granted by the state or through state resources in any form whatsoever;
2. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni razmerje med pravili o notranjem trgu in zagotavljanjem javnih storitev ter naj zagotovi uporabo načela solidarnosti pri opredelitvi, organizaciji in financiranju javnih storitev;
Demands that the Commission provide clarification of the relationship between the rules of the internal market, and the provision of public services and that it ensure that the principle of subsidiarity is applied in the definition, organisation and financing of public services;
6. je zaskrbljen nad dodatnimi zahtevami, ki jih želi uvesti Komisija, da bi preprečila vpliv na razvoj trgovine v nasprotju z interesi Unije in je prepričan, da bo to imelo za posledico pravno negotovost;
Is concerned about the additional requirements that the Commission wants to introduce in order to ensure that the development of trade is not affected to an extent contrary to the interests of the Union, and believes that these will result in legal uncertainty;
9. poudarja, da je treba pri preoblikovanju pravil posebno pozornost nameniti zagotavljanju, da so uporabljeni koncepti in izrazi Skupnosti jasno prilagojeni naravi javnih storitev in raznolikosti organizacijskih oblik in udeleženih akterjev ter da upoštevajo dejansko tveganje vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami;
Stresses that particular attention must be paid, when reviewing the rules, to ensuring that the Community concepts and terms used are clearly tailored to the nature of public services and the diversity of forms of organisation and stakeholders involved, and that they take proper account of the actual risk of an impact on trade between Member States;
14. meni, da bi prihodnji predlog Komisije o projektnih obveznicah EU 2020 lahko bil in mora biti pomemben generator razvoja storitev splošnega pomena v državah članicah in na ravni Evropske unije; poudarja, da je treba postopke, ki so vzpostavljeni v ta namen, izrecno opredeliti v okviru za upravičenost projektov, ki ga je treba določiti po običajnem zakonodajnem postopku;
Deems that the forthcoming Commission proposal on EU 2020 Project Bonds could and should be a major vector for the development of services of general interest in the Member States as well as at EU level; underlines that procedures established with that purpose should be explicitly laid down in a project eligibility framework to be defined following the ordinary legislative procedure;
17. želi v tem okviru poudariti, da ima razvoj javno-javnega sodelovanja s skupno uporabo sredstev velike možnosti za povečanje učinkovitosti rabe javnih sredstev in posodobitev javnih storitev v odziv na nove potrebe državljanov na lokalnih območjih; poudarja tudi pomen čezmejnega sodelovanja;
Would emphasise here that the development of public-public cooperation, by pooling resources, offers great potential for increasing efficiency in the use of public resources and modernising public services to meet the new needs of people in their local areas; also emphasises the importance of cross-border cooperation;