natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju rezultatov dela delovnih skupin UNHRC glede postopka pritožbe, splošnega rednega pregleda, prihodnjega sistema strokovnega svetovanja, programa, letnega delovnega programa, metod dela, poslovnika in pregleda posebnih postopkov,
having regard to the outcome of the work of the UNHRC's working groups on the complaints procedure, the Universal Periodic Review (UPR), the future system of expert advice, the agenda, the annual programme of work, working methods, the rules of procedure and the review of Special Procedures,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov tretjih volitev držav članic v UNHRC, ki so potekale v okviru Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov 21. maja 2008,
having regard to the results of the third election of member states to the UNHRC held at the UN General Assembly on 21 May 2008,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov volitev za predsedstvo UNHRC, ki so potekale 19. junija 2008,
having regard to the results of the elections for the Presidency of the UNHRC held on 19 June 2008,
ob upoštevanju prvega
having regard to the first
drugega in tretjega zasedanja v okviru splošnega rednega pregleda, ki je potekalo od 7. do 18. aprila 2008, od 5. do 16. maja 2008 in od 1. do 15. decembra 2008,
second and third sessions of the UPR held from 7 to 18 April 2008, from 5 to 16 May 2008 and from 1 to 15 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0498/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0498/2008 ),
ker EU namenja človekovim pravicam in demokraciji osrednje mesto v svojih zunanjih odnosih in ker njena zunanja politika temelji na močni in nedvoumni podpori učinkovitemu multilateralizmu, kot je navedeno v Ustanovni listini Združenih narodov,
whereas the EU places human rights and democracy at the heart of its external relations, and whereas its foreign policy is based on strong and unequivocal support for effective multilateralism, as embodied in the UN Charter,
ker so Združeni narodi in UNHRC med najprimernejšimi organizacijami za izčrpno obravnavo vprašanj v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in humanitarnih izzivov,
whereas the UN and the UNHRC are amongst the most appropriate organisations to deal comprehensively with human rights issues and humanitarian challenges,
ker je bila odločitev o ustanovitvi UNHRC na splošno sprejeta kot pobuda za odpravo pomanjkljivosti Komisije Združenih narodov za človekove pravice in okrepitev vloge človekovih pravic v medvladnih razpravah,
whereas the decision on establishment of the UNHRC as a quasi-standing body has been generally welcomed as an initiative to rectify the shortcomings of the UNCHR and enhance the place of human rights within intergovernmental debates,
ker je EU odločno podpirala in zagovarjala ustanovitev UNHRC ter ker so se EU in njene države članice zavezale in odločile imeti aktivno in vidno vlogo pri oblikovanju in podpori učinkovitega organa, ki obravnava aktualne izzive na področju človekovih pravic,
whereas the EU has been a strong supporter and advocate of the establishment of the UNHRC, and whereas the EU and its Member States have committed and dedicated themselves to playing an active and visible role with a view to creating and supporting an effective body addressing contemporary human rights challenges,
ker je EU odločno zagovarjala uvedbo okrepljene večine in meril za članstvo pri volitvah v UNHRC, predlogi, ki niso bili sprejeti, ter določitev postopkov za spremljanje dejanskega izvajanja volilnih obljub držav članic Združenih narodov,
whereas the EU strongly supported the establishment of reinforced majority and membership criteria for election to the UNHRC, proposals which have not been retained, and of procedures for the monitoring of the actual implementation of the UN member states" election pledges,
ker se je pokazalo, da države članice skladneje sodelujejo v UNHRC kot v Komisiji Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, čeprav omejitve glede enotnosti EU še vedno obstajajo, zlasti zaradi nasprotujočih nacionalnih interesov in vztrajne želje držav članic, da bi pri Združenih narodih delovale neodvisno,
whereas, whilst there are still limits to the EU's ability to adopt a unified approach , due in particular to conflicting national interests and a persistent desire on the part of Member States to act independently at the UN, there is evidence that they act more cohesively in the UNHRC than they did in the UNCHR,
ker dejstvo, da so države članice EU v UNHRC v številčni manjšini, resno ovira sposobnost EU, da vpliva na dnevni red UNHRC, ter predstavlja resen izziv za vključevanje stališč EU v delo UNHRC,
whereas the fact that EU Member States constitute a numerical minority within the UNHRC seriously obstructs the EU's ability to influence the agenda of the UNHRC and poses a serious challenge to the integration of EU positions in the work of the UNHRC,
ker je obžalovanja vredna odsotnost Združenih držav iz UNHRC povzročila potrebo po tem, da EU okrepi svojo vlogo vodilne sile demokratičnih držav na področju človekovih pravic,
whereas the regrettable absence of the United States from the UNHRC has led to the need for the EU to strengthen its role as a leading force amongst democratic countries on human rights issues,
ker Parlament pozorno spremlja dogajanje v UNHRC z rednim pošiljanjem delegacij na njegova zasedanja in s povabili posebnim poročevalcem in neodvisnim strokovnjakom, da prispevajo k delu Parlamenta na področju človekovih pravic,
whereas Parliament closely follows developments in the UNHRC, by sending regular delegations to its sessions and by inviting Special Rapporteurs and independent experts to contribute to its work on human rights,
ker bodo postopki in mehanizmi UNHRC leta 2011 pregledani, kot je določeno v prej omenjeni Resoluciji A/RES/60/251 Generalne skupščine,
whereas the UNHRC's procedures and mechanisms are to be reviewed in 2011, as provided for by the above-mentioned Resolution A/RES/60/251 of the General Assembly,
Splošna ocena prvih treh let UNHRC
Overall assessment of the UNHRC's first three years
pozdravlja delo, ki ga je doslej opravil UNHRC in ugotavlja, da bi UNHRC lahko postal dragocen okvir za večstranska prizadevanja EU na področju človekovih pravic; vendar obžaluje, da nov organ v prvih treh letih svojega delovanja še ni dosegel znatnejšega napredka pri izboljševanju rezultatov Združenih narodov na področju človekovih pravic;
Welcomes the work carried out by the UNHRC so far and notes that the UNHRC has the potential to develop into a valuable framework for the EU's multilateral human rights efforts; however, regrets that, during the first three years of its activities, the new body has not yet achieved more substantial progress in improving the UN human rights record;
pozdravlja pomembna besedila za določanje standardov na področju človekovih pravic, ki jih je sprejel UNHRC: mednarodno konvencijo o zaščiti vseh oseb pred prisilnim izginotjem, Deklaracijo Združenih narodov o zaščiti prvotnih prebivalcev ter Izbirni protokol k Mednarodnem paktu o gospodarskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah; ugotavlja, da slednji predstavlja prelomno odločitev, saj predvideva postopek za posamezne pritožbe in tako ustvarja mehanizem, ki omogoča žrtvam kršitev gospodarskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravic, da vložijo peticije na mednarodni ravni; poziva države članice, naj čim prej ratificirajo Izbirni protokol k Mednarodnemu paktu o gospodarskih, socialnih in kulturnih pravicah;
Welcomes the adoption by the UNHRC of important human rights standard-setting texts: the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearances and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, as well as the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; notes that the latter constitutes a landmark decision as it provides for an individual complaints procedure, thereby creating a mechanism enabling victims of violations of economic, social and cultural rights to present petitions at the international level; urges all States to ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights rapidly;
obžaluje neukrepanje UNHRC v več kriznih situacijah na področju človekovih pravic na svetu, delno zaradi vse večje nepripravljenosti številnih držav UNHRC, ki nasprotujejo kakršnemu koli upoštevanju razmer v posameznih državah, vključno s pomočjo resolucij o državah, posebnih zasedanj in državnih mandatov za posebne postopke, ker bi to domnevno povzročilo politizacijo UNHRC; ponovno poudarja, da je zmožnost UNHRC, da učinkovito obravnava razmere v posameznih državah, osrednjega pomena za njegovo avtoriteto in verodostojnost;
Regrets the failure of the UNHRC to take action on many of the world's most urgent human rights situations, partly due to the growing reluctance on the part of numerous UNHRC States which oppose any consideration of country situations including through country resolutions, special sessions and Special Procedures country mandates on the grounds that this would allegedly politicise the UNHRC; reiterates the view that the UNHRC's ability to address country situations effectively is central to its authority and credibility;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je postopek za volitve v UNHRC omogočil, da se iz UNHRC izključijo največji kršitelji človekovih pravic, kot sta Iran in Belorusija; obžaluje, da vse geografske skupine niso izvedle pravih postopkov za volitve v zvezi s pristopom k UNHRC; obžaluje, da je sistem prostovoljnega jamstva imel zelo raznolike in neustrezne rezultate in je vladam omogočal, da so se izogibale svojim mednarodnim obvezam na področju človekovih pravic; v zvezi s tem je močno zaskrbljen zaradi taktične rabe tako imenovanih obveznosti v nekaterih državah članicah in zato ponovno potrjuje, da bi moralo polno sodelovanje s posebnimi postopki ostati najmanjši kriterij za pristop k UNHRC;
Welcomes the fact that the procedure for election to the UNHRC has made it possible to exclude from the UNHRC major human rights violators such as Iran and Belarus; regrets, nevertheless, that not all geographic groups have organised genuine procedures for elections concerning accession to the UNHRC; regrets that the system of voluntary pledges has had very disparate and inadequate results, enabling governments to shy away from their international human rights obligations; in this regard, is deeply concerned by the tactical use of so-called commitments by some members and therefore reaffirms that full cooperation with Special Procedures should remain the bottom-line criterion for acceding to the UNHRC;
obžaluje vse večjo razdeljenost UNHRC na regionalne bloke; meni, da "mentaliteta blokovske razdelitve" ogroža njegovo zmožnost, da učinkovito, nepristransko in objektivno obravnava kršitve človekovih pravic po svetu, ter da bi lahko bila takšna mentaliteta pravi vzrok za pristranskost, selektivnost in šibkost UNHRC;
Regrets the growing division of the UNHRC into regional blocs; considers that this "bloc mentality" undermines the ability of the UNHRC to deal effectively, impartially and objectively with human rights violations around the world, and that it could be the real cause of the bias, selectivity and weakness of the UNHRC;
priznava, da številne delegacije v Ženevi niso zadostno opremljene, da bi ustrezno nadaljevale pogajanja na področju človekovih pravic in so zato odvisne od vodij skupin, da oblikujejo njihovo stališče; vendar ugotavlja, da je bil ta trend uspešno izenačen v nekaterih ključnih vprašanjih, kot sta kodeks ravnanja glede posebnih postopkov in razmere v Darfurju, predvsem v azijskih in afriških skupinah; obenem pa poudarja, da so skupna stališča, ki jih je EU sprejela skupaj z državami pristopnicami, veliko prispevale k blokovski mentaliteti; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži letno poročilo o glasovalnih vzorcih na področju človekovih pravic v Združenih narodih in naj analizira, kako so nanje vplivale politike EU, držav članic EU in drugih skupin;
Recognises that a number of delegations in Geneva are insufficiently equipped to pursue human rights negotiations adequately and thus rely on group leaders to formulate their position; nevertheless, notes that this trend has been efficiently counterbalanced with regard to several key issues such as the code of conduct for Special Procedures and the situation in Darfur, notably within the Asian and African groups; emphasises at the same time that the positions adopted jointly by the EU together with the acceding countries have greatly contributed to the bloc mentality; asks the Commission to provide an annual report on voting patterns on human rights within the UN, analysing how these have been affected by the policies of the EU, of EU Member States and of other blocs;
priznava, da široko članstvo v UNHRC in sodelovanje številnih držav opazovalk zagotavlja, da so praktično vse države vključene v njegove razprave; z mislijo na prihodnje poročilo leta 2011 meni, da bi lahko preučili možnost odprtja UNHRC za splošno članstvona eni strani, na drugi strani pa bi bila koristna manjša sestava;
Acknowledges that the broad membership of the UNHRC and the participation of many observer states ensures that virtually all countries are involved in its debates; considers, looking ahead to the 2011 review, that on the one hand the possibility of opening up the UNHRC to universal membership could be explored, whereas on the other hand a smaller composition could prove to be beneficial;
potrjuje tekočo razpravo o odnosu med UNHRC in tretjim odborom Generalne skupščine; v zvezi s tem ponovno opozarja, da je naloga tretjega odbora, da v tem organu, ki ga sestavljajo vse države članice Združenih narodov, predstavi glavne pomisleke UNHRC; meni, da ta organ lahko tudi nadomesti pomanjkljivosti UNHRC, kot Generalna skupščina nadomešča pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z odločitvami Varnostnega sveta, kar je pomemben element dopolnjevanja med UNHRC in tretjim odborom; poziva EU, naj ponovno poudari svojo zavezanost podpori UNHRC in izboljšanju njegove učinkovitosti, kot edinstvene platforme, specializirane za splošne človekove pravice, in posebnega foruma, ki obravnava človekove pravice v sistemu Združenih narodov;
Acknowledges the ongoing discussion on the relationship between the UNHRC and the Third Committee of the General Assembly; recalls, in this connection, that the task of the Third Committee is to pass on within that body, which includes all UN member states, the main concerns of the UNHRC; considers that that body can also offset the UNHRC's shortcomings, just as the General Assembly does with regard to the decisions of the Security Council, which is an important element of complementarity between the UNHRC and the Third Committee; calls on the EU to reiterate its commitment to supporting the UNHRC and improving its effectiveness, as a unique platform specialising in universal human rights and a specific forum dealing with human rights within the UN system;
izraža veliko zaskrbljenost zaradi vse večjega ogrožanja načela univerzalnosti človekovih pravic, kar je razvidno zlasti iz poskusov nekaterih držav, da bi uvedle omejitve glede priznanih človekovih pravic, kot je svoboda izražanja, ali da bi človekove pravice razlagale glede na kulturno, ideološko ali tradicionalno ozadje; poziva EU, naj ostane pozorna glede teh poskusov in trdno zagovarja načela univerzalnosti, neločljivosti in medsebojne odvisnosti človekovih pravic;
Expresses strong concern at the fact that the principle of the universality of human rights is being increasingly put at risk, as is illustrated in particular by the attempts on the part of certain countries to introduce limits to well-recognised human rights, such as freedom of expression, or to interpret human rights against a cultural, ideological or traditional background; calls on the EU to remain vigilant vis-à-vis these attempts and to strongly defend the principles of the universality, indivisibility and interdependence of human rights;
meni, da so posebni postopki v središču mehanizmov Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah in poudarja, da sta verodostojnost in učinkovitost UNHRC pri zaščiti človekovih pravic odvisna od sodelovanja s posebnimi postopki in njihovega popolnega izvajanja ter od sprejemanja reform, ki bi okrepile njihovo zmožnost obravnavanja kršitev človekovih pravic;
Considers that the Special Procedures are at the core of the UN human rights machinery and stresses that the credibility and effectiveness of the UNHRC in the protection of human rights rests on cooperation with Special Procedures and their full implementation, as well as on the adoption of reforms that would strengthen their ability to address human rights violations;
meni, da so posebni postopki o razmerah v posameznih državah bistven instrument za izboljšanje stanja človekovih pravic na terenu; meni, da narava in pogostost pregledov v posamezni državi v okviru splošnega rednega pregleda ne more nadomestiti mandatov držav; zato nasprotuje poskusom nekaterih držav, da uporabijo argument "racionalizacije" posebnih postopkov, da bi te mandate odpravile; v zvezi s tem obžaluje odpravo mandatov držav za Republiko Belorusijo, Demokratično republiko Kongo in Republiko Kubo ter ukinitev skupine strokovnjakov za Darfur;
Regards Special Procedures on country situations as an essential instrument for improving human rights on the ground; considers that the nature and frequency of the country reviews under the UPR cannot replace country mandates; consequently opposes the attempts by certain countries to use the argument of "rationalisation" of Special Procedures in order to eliminate those mandates; deplores in this respect the termination of country mandates in respect of the Republic of Belarus, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Cuba, and the abolition of the Group of Experts on Darfur;
je seznanjen z uvedbo pogojev za ukinitev državnega mandata Burundija; priznava pomen opredelitve izhodne strategije za posebne postopke vsake od teh držav;
Notes the introduction of conditions for the suspension of the country mandate of Burundi; recognises the importance of defining an exit strategy for each of these country Special Procedures;
obsoja poskuse več članic UNHRC, da bi omejile neodvisnost in učinkovitost posebnih postopkov; v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da je bil 18. junija 2007 sprejet kodeks ravnanja za nosilce mandatov za posebne postopke; poziva UNHRC, naj ta kodeks izvaja v skladu s prej omenjeno Resolucijo A/RES/60/251 in naj spoštuje neodvisnost posebnih postopkov;
Condemns the efforts made by several UNHRC members to limit the independence and efficiency of Special Procedures; notes in this respect the adoption on 18 June 2007 of a Code of Conduct for Special Procedures Mandate-Holders; calls on the UNHRC to implement that Code of Conduct in the spirit of the above-mentioned Resolution A/RES/60/251 and to respect the independence of Special Procedures;
poziva k temu, da se izboljšata izbiranje in imenovanje primernih nosilcev mandatov za posebne postopke, zlasti tako, da se poišče načine in sredstva za okrepitev obstoječega seznama kandidatov v okviru Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice ter da se okrepi neodvisnost nosilcev mandatov s sklicevanjem na izkušnje in strokovno znanje kandidatov, pri čemer je treba upoštevati geografsko zastopanost in uravnoteženost spolov;
Calls for the selection and nomination of appropriate Special Procedures mandate-holders to be improved, in particular by seeking ways and means to strengthen the existing roster of candidates within the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and reinforcing the independence of mandate-holders by reference to the candidates' experience and expertise, while paying due regard to geographical representation and gender balance;
poudarja potrebo po boljšem spremljanju ugotovitev in priporočil v okviru posebnih postopkov, na primer z vzpostavitvijo mehanizmov za poročanje o izvajanju priporočil;
Underlines the need for better follow-up to the findings and recommendations of Special Procedures, which could include the establishment of mechanisms to report on the implementation of recommendations;
meni, da je splošni redni pregled instrument, ki dopolnjuje posebne postopke, in predstavlja priložnost za učinkovitejšo uporabo njihovih poročil iz posebnih postopkov in za zagotovitev večjega sodelovanja in spremljanja njihovega dela;
Considers that the UPR is an instrument which complements Special Procedures and presents an opportunity to make more effective use of their reports and to ensure increased cooperation and follow-up to their work;
poziva k nadaljnji podpori posebnih postopkov glede finančnih sredstev in človeških virov;
Calls for continuous support to be given to Special Procedures in terms of finance and human resources;
priznava potencialno vrednost mehanizma splošnega rednega pregleda pri izboljšanju univerzalnosti nadzora obveznosti in praks na področju človekovih pravic po svetu, s tem, da se vse države članice Združenih narodov enake obravnavajo in pregledajo, in s tem, da se nevladnim organizacijam ponudi nove možnosti za začetek dialoga s posameznimi državami;
Recognises the potential value of the UPR mechanism in improving the universality of the monitoring of human rights commitments and practices throughout the world by subjecting all UN member states to equal treatment and scrutiny and opening up new opportunities for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to enter into dialogue with particular States;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je splošni redni pregled več držav članic Združenih narodov spodbudil, da se zavežejo k izvajanju svojih mednarodnih obveznosti, k uresničevanju sklepov in priporočil organov za spremljanje izvajanja pogodb in posebnih postopkov, k pripravi preglednih poročil za organe za spremljanje izvajanja pogodb, k odzivanju na izredne zahteve za povabilo posebnih postopkov in k ratificiranju še neratificiranih pogodb in celo k sprejetju nacionalne zakonodaje za zagotavljanje skladnosti z obveznostmi, ki izhajajo iz pogodb, ki so jih podpisale;
Welcomes the fact that the UPR has provided an incentive to many UN-member states to commit themselves to implementing their international obligations, following up on the conclusions and recommendations of treaty bodies and Special Procedures, presenting overview reports to treaty bodies, responding to outstanding requests for the invitation of Special Procedures and ratifying outstanding treaties and adopting national legislation aimed at ensuring compliance with obligations stemming from treaties to which they have signed up;
obžaluje, da prva tri zasedanja niso povsem izpolnila pričakovanj glede postopka, ki mora potekati "objektivno, pregledno, neselektivno, konstruktivno, brez konfliktov in politizacije" Resolucija UNHRC 5/1 z dne 18. junija 2007.
Regrets that the first three sessions have not entirely lived up to expectations with regard to an "objective, transparent, non-selective, constructive, non-confrontational and non-politicized" process UNHRC Resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007.
poudarja, da se ta cilj lahko doseže samo, če vse faze postopka pregleda vključujejo neodvisno strokovno mnenje ter učinkovit, v rezultate usmerjen mehanizem spremljanja;
Stresses that this objective can be achieved only if the review involves independent expertise at all stages of the review process and an effective, result-oriented follow-up mechanism;
obžaluje pomanjkanje osredotočenosti na gospodarske, socialne in kulturne pravice ter pravice manjšin med postopkom splošnega rednega pregleda in poziva, da se tem pravicam nameni več pozornosti med prihodnjimi zasedanji, v skladu z načelom univerzalnosti, neločljivosti in medsebojne odvisnosti človekovih pravic;
Deplores the lack of focus on economic, social and cultural rights as well as the rights of minorities during the UPR process, and calls for increased attention to be given to these rights during the coming sessions, in line with the principle of the universality, indivisibility and interdependence of human rights;