natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da humanitarna določba iz člena 15 Dublinske uredbe dublinskemu sistemu zagotavlja znatno prožnost, vendar jo je treba uporabljati širše, da družine ne bi trpele zaradi ločenosti;
Considers that the humanitarian clause contained in Article 15 of the Dublin Regulation gives considerable flexibility to the Dublin system, but that it should be applied more widely, so as to avoid undue hardship to families as a result of separation;
meni, da je treba prosilca za azil, ki je zaradi resne bolezni, hude invalidnosti, starosti ali nosečnosti še posebno ranljiv in je zato odvisen od pomoči sorodnika, ki se zadržuje na ozemlju države članice, ki ni odgovorna za obravnavo prošnje, ponovno združiti z omenjenim sorodnikom, če je to mogoče; poziva Komisijo, da razmisli o obvezni uporabi zadevnih določb humanitarne določbe iz člena 15(2);
Considers that where an asylum seeker is in a particularly vulnerable state owing to a serious illness, a severe disability, old age or pregnancy, and he or she is therefore dependent on the assistance of a relative present in the territory of a Member State other than the one in charge of the examination of the application, he or she should, as far as possible, be reunited with that relative; asks the Commission to consider making compulsory the relevant provisions of the humanitarian clause in Article 15(2);
meni, da bi bilo treba za organizacije, kot sta Rdeči križ in Rdeči polmesec, uvesti dolžnost, da na lastno pobudo izsledijo družinske člane;
Considers that a proactive duty to trace family members should be introduced for organisations such as the Red Cross and Red Crescent;
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da se podrobneje opredelijo okoliščine in postopki za uporabo določbe o prenosu suverenosti, zlasti zato, da se uvede zahteva o soglašanju prosilca za azil;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to better specify the circumstances and procedures for applying the Sovereignty clause, notably in order to introduce the condition of the asylum-seeker's consent;
Zbiranje podatkov in Eurodac
Data collection and Eurodac
je zaskrbljen nad razhajanji in pomanjkljivostmi pri zbiranju podatkov, izpostavljenimi v poročilu Komisije o oceni dublinskega sistema, zlasti v zvezi z jemanjem prstnih odtisov nezakonitim priseljencem na mejah Unije, zaradi česar obstaja resen dvom o veljavnosti sistema; verjame, da bo zgoraj navedena Uredba (ES) št. 862/2007 o statistikah Skupnosti o selitvah in mednarodni zaščiti zainteresiranem stranem zagotovila natančnejši prikaz delovanja dublinskega sistema in drugih instrumentov Skupnosti v zvezi z mednarodno zaščito;
Expresses its concern at the discrepancies and deficiencies in the collection of data revealed by the Commission's evaluation of the Dublin system, especially in relation to the registering of fingerprints of illegal entrants at the borders of the Union, which casts serious doubts on the validity of the system; trusts that the above-mentioned Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 on Community statistics on migration and international protection will give the stakeholders a more accurate picture of the functioning of the Dublin system and other Community instruments on international protection;
je zaskrbljen, ker zdaj ni na voljo nobena ocena stroškov dublinskega sistema; poziva Komisijo, da odpravi to težavo, ker je to pomemben dejavnik za oceno sistema;
Expresses its concern that no cost-assessment of the Dublin system is currently available; calls on the Commission to remedy this as it is an important aspect of the evaluation of the system;
se je z zanimanjem seznanil s pomisleki Komisije v zvezi z zbiranjem in kakovostjo podatkov, poslanih centralni enoti Eurodaca, ter neizpolnjevanjem obveznosti o brisanju določenih podatkov in predpisov o spoštovanju osebnih podatkov; meni, da je treba te pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z zanesljivostjo Eurodaca pred načrtovanjem kakršne koli druge uporabe te zbirke podatkov ustrezno preučiti;
Notes with interest the concerns expressed by the Commission regarding the collection and the quality of data sent to the Eurodac Central Unit, as well as regarding non-compliance with the obligation to delete certain data and with the rules relating to the protection of personal data; considers that these failings, which call into question the reliability of Eurodac, should be addressed properly before any other use of this database be envisaged;
meni, da bi morala vsaka država članica na zaprtem seznamu navesti agencije in organe, ki imajo dostop do zbirke podatkov Eurodac, in pojasniti njihove namene, da se prepreči kakršna koli nezakonita uporaba podatkov;
Considers that each Member State should clarify, on a closed list, the agencies and authorities that have access to the Eurodac database, and for what purpose, in order to prevent any illegal use of data;
poudarja, da obstaja nevarnost, da bi se z razširitvijo dostopa do sistema Eurodac za policijske organe in organe kazenskega pregona ter Europol informacije posredovale tretjim državam, kar bi lahko imelo negativne posledice za prosilce za azil in njihove družine; je prepričan, da bi se s tem povečalo tveganje za zaznamovanost prosilcev za azil;
Stresses that extending access to the Eurodac database to Member States' police and law-enforcement authorities as well as to Europol entails the risk that information may pass to third countries, which could have negative repercussions for asylum seekers and their families; is convinced that this would also increase the risk of asylum seekers being stigmatised;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o določenih vprašanjih glede zavarovanja avtomobilske odgovornosti ( 2007/2258(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 2 September 2008 on certain issues relating to motor insurance ( 2007/2258(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o določenih vprašanjih glede zavarovanja avtomobilske odgovornosti ( KOM(2007)0207 ) ("poročilo Komisije"),
having regard to the Commission report on certain issues relating to Motor Insurance ( COM(2007)0207 ) (the "Commission Report"),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. maja 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti (Četrta direktiva o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti) UL L 181, 20.7.2000, str.
having regard to Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (Fourth motor insurance Directive) OJ L 181, 20.7.2000, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0249/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0249/2008 ),
ker se je število ljudi in prevoznih sredstev, ki potujejo čez nacionalne meje v poslovne in zasebne namene, zaradi prostega pretoka ljudi v EU zlasti v zvezi z nedavnima širitvama in ustrezno razširitvijo schengenske skupine znatno povečalo v zelo kratkem obdobju,
whereas the free movement of persons in the EU, particularly in the context of the most recent two rounds of enlargement and the corresponding extension of the Schengen group, has resulted in a rapid increase in the number of both persons and vehicles travelling across national borders for both business and private purposes,
ker je zaradi prednostne naloge varovanja žrtev nesreč potrebna jasna, natančna in učinkovita zakonodaja v zvezi z avtomobilskim zavarovanjem na ravni EU,
whereas the priority of protecting accident victims requires clear, precise and effective motor insurance legislation at EU level,
ker je bila s Četrto direktivo o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti Komisija pozvana, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o izvajanju in učinkovitosti nacionalnih sankcij, uvedenih v zvezi s postopkom utemeljene ponudbe/odgovora, in o njihovi enakovrednosti, ter da po potrebi pripravi predloge,
whereas the Fourth motor insurance Directive called on the Commission to report to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation and the effectiveness of national penalties introduced in respect of the reasoned offer/reply procedure, as well as on their equivalence, and to submit proposals if necessary,
ker obravnava poročilo Komisije določbe v zvezi z nacionalnimi sankcijami, učinkovitostjo mehanizmov pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov in obstoječo razpoložljivost prostovoljnega zavarovanja stroškov postopka, ki ga lahko dodatno sklenejo morebitni oškodovanci v prometnih nesrečah,
whereas the Commission Report examines national penalty provisions, the effectiveness of the claims representative mechanism, and the existing availability of voluntary legal expenses insurance to which potential victims of road accidents can additionally subscribe,
ker ureja člen 4(6) Četrte direktive o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti postopek utemeljene ponudbe, pri čemer imajo oškodovanci v avtomobilskih nesrečah v tujini pravico do uveljavitve odškodnine prek zavarovateljevega pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ki je določen v državi, kjer ima oškodovanec stalno prebivališče,
whereas Article 4(6) of the Fourth motor insurance Directive governs the reasoned offer procedure, under which victims of car accidents abroad have the right to apply for compensation to the claims representative of the insurer appointed in the country of the victim's residence,
ker mora oškodovanec od zavarovatelja v treh mesecih prejeti utemeljen odgovor, pri čemer so v nasprotnem primeru predvidene sankcije,
whereas the victim must receive a reasoned reply from the insurer within three months or sanctions are envisaged,
ker je treba delovanje teh določb še vedno pojasniti,
whereas clarification of the functioning of this provision is still needed,
ker mora Komisija pri izvajanju politik EU v celoti upoštevati širitev, zlasti sorazmerno visoke stroške zavarovanja avtomobilske odgovornosti v novih državah članicah,
whereas the Commission must take full account of enlargement when implementing EU policies, in particular the relatively high cost of motor insurance in the new Member States,
ker se v državah članicah izvajajo različne določbe o sankcijah v zvezi s postopkom utemeljene ponudbe/odgovora,
whereas different penalty provisions in respect of the reasoned offer/reply procedure have been implemented in the Member States,
ker so posvetovanja z nacionalnimi organi, vključno s temi organi v novih državah članicah potrdila, da so sedanje določbe o sankcijah, kjer obstajajo, ustrezne in da je njihovo izvajanje učinkovito v celotni EU,
whereas consultations with national authorities, including in the new Member States, have confirmed that current penalty provisions, where they exist, are adequate and that their implementation is effective across the EU,
ker nekatere države članice ne predvidevajo posebnih sankcij in se zanašajo izključno na dolžnost zavarovateljev, da plačujejo predpisane obresti na znesek odškodnine, če se utemeljena ponudba/odgovor ne opravi v roku treh mesecev,
whereas, however, some Member States make no provision for specific sanctions and rely solely upon the insurers' duty to pay statutory interest on the amount of compensation if the reasoned offer/reply is not made within three months,
ker je sistem pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov dobro znan v večini držav članic,
whereas the claims representatives system is relatively well known in the majority of Member States,
ker je posvetovanje, ki ga je izvedla Komisija, da bi ocenila osveščenost državljanov o sistemu pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, vključevalo le države članice in zavarovalni sektor, ne da bi primerno vključevalo državljanov in potrošniške organizacije, namreč tiste, ki jim je najbolj pomembno, da sistem pravilno deluje;
whereas the consultations carried out by the Commission to assess citizens" awareness of the claims representative system involved only the Member States and the insurance industry, without appropriately involving citizens and consumer associations, i.e. those most interested in ensuring that the system works properly,
ker je zavarovanje stroškov postopka za pravne stroške, ki jih krije oškodovanec iz prometne nesreče, na voljo v večini držav članic; ker je več kot 90 % vseh primerov urejenih v izvensodnih poravnavah in so stroški postopka v večini držav članic povrnjeni; ker so poleg tega zavarovatelji za stroške postopka zagotavljali kritje vseh vrst primerov v tujini že v preteklosti in zato ustanovili lastne oddelke za odškodninske zahtevke iz tujine in spodbujanje hitrih obravnav,
whereas legal expenses insurance for legal costs borne by the victims of motor vehicle accidents is available in most Member States; whereas more than 90% of all cases are settled out-of-court and legal costs are reimbursed in many Member States; whereas, additionally, legal expenses insurers have already provided coverage for all types of cross-border case for a number of years and consequently have established their own departments to handle foreign claims and facilitate quick settlements,
ker o vprašanju, ali morajo biti taki utemeljeni stroški postopka kriti z zavarovanjem avtomobilske odgovornosti v vseh državah članicah, še vedno poteka razprava,
whereas the question of whether such reasonable legal costs should be covered by Motor Third Party Liability insurance in all Member States is still open,
ker kritje stroškov postopka v vseh državah članicah z zavarovanjem avtomobilske odgovornosti pripomore k boljšemu varovanju evropskih potrošnikov in povečuje njihovo zaupanje,
whereas, however, coverage of reasonable legal costs in all Member States by Motor Third Party Liability insurance helps to better protect European consumers and increase their confidence,
ker se zavarovalni trgi v novih državah članicah stalno razvijajo; ker je v številnih državah članicah zavarovanje stroškov postopka na trgu relativno novo in ga je treba zato spodbujati, saj je javnost o tem obveščena sorazmerno slabo,
whereas insurance markets in the new Member States are steadily developing; whereas, however, in a number of these Member States, legal expenses insurance is a relatively new product that needs to be promoted, as public awareness of legal expenses insurance is comparatively low,
ker mora biti potrošnikovo zaupanje v zavarovanje avtomobilske odgovornosti, zlasti kadar so zahtevana pravna sredstva, zaradi obveznega kritja stroškov postopka večje, saj so potrošniki v več državah članicah previdni v zvezi z visokimi pravnimi stroški, ki bi bili kriti z obveznim zavarovanjem,
whereas compulsory cover for legal costs should increase consumer confidence in Motor Third Party Liability insurance, particularly in cases where legal redress is sought, since consumers in many new Member States are wary of high legal fees, which would be covered by compulsory insurance,
ker bi bilo sodstvo zaradi obveznega zavarovanja stroškov postopka še bolj obremenjeno, primeri pa bi bili bolj zapleteni, pri čemer bi bilo zato verjetno tudi več zamud v zvezi z reševanjem sporov ter večji delež neupravičenih odškodninskih zahtevkov,
whereas compulsory legal expenses insurance would create an additional and more complex workload for the judiciary and possibly create delays in the resolution of disputes and a higher percentage of unjustified claims,
ker imata zavarovanje avtomobilske odgovornosti in zavarovanje stroškov postopka različne cilje ter različne naloge, in sicer da zavarovanje avtomobilske odgovornosti omogoča kritje stroškov vseh odškodninskih zahtevkov potrošnikov zoper njega v prometni nesreči in da zavarovanje stroškov postopka krije vse pravne stroške vložitve zahtevka zoper tretjo stranko v prometni nesreči,
whereas Motor Third Party Liability insurance and legal expenses insurance have different objectives and serve different functions, namely that while Motor Third Party Liability insurance allows consumers to meet the cost of claims made against them following a road traffic accident, legal expenses insurance covers the legal costs of pursuing a claim against a third party following a road traffic accident,
ker so javne kampanje nacionalnih organov, zavarovalnega sektorja in potrošniških organizacij pomembne za razvoj nacionalnih trgov,
whereas public campaigns by national authorities, the insurance industry and consumer organisations are important for the development of national markets,
pozdravlja poročilo Komisije in poudarja pomembnost vključevanja vseh zainteresiranih strani v celoti in učinkovito, zlasti potrošnikov, v proces posvetovanja v zvezi z oblikovanjem politik EU na tem področju;
Welcomes the Commission Report and highlights the importance of including, fully and effectively, all stakeholders, in particular consumers, in the process of consultation in the development of EU policy in this field;
zato poziva k sistematičnemu vključevanju potrošniških organizacij, ki zastopajo zlasti oškodovance, v proces ocenjevanja učinkovitosti vzpostavljenih sistemov v državah članicah;
Calls therefore for the systematic involvement of consumer organisations representing in particular victims in the process of evaluation of the effectiveness of the systems in place in the Member States;
pozdravlja naknadno vrednotenje zakonodajnih ukrepov, s čimer se zagotovi, da pravila delujejo, kot je bilo predvideno, in da se poudarijo kakršne koli nepredvidene neustrezne uporabe;
Welcomes this ex-post evaluation of legislative measures to ensure that the rules are working as intended and to highlight any unforeseen misapplications;
poudarja pomembnost večjega potrošnikovega zaupanja v politiko avtomobilskega zavarovanja v zvezi s potovanjem z motornimi vozili čez meje znotraj EU zlasti za voznike iz starih držav članic, ki potujejo v nove države članice, in obratno;
Stresses the importance of increasing consumer confidence in motor insurance policies as regards cross-border motor vehicle travel within the EU, especially for motorists from the old Member States travelling to destinations in the new Member States and vice versa;
meni, da spodbujanje obstoječih pravnih in tržno usmerjenih rešitev, ki varujejo potrošnika, krepi potrošnikovo zaupanje v avtomobilsko zavarovanje;
Considers that the promotion of existing legal and market-led solutions which protect the consumer strengthen consumer confidence in motor insurance;
meni, da so države članice odgovorne tudi za dobro delovanje svojih nacionalnih sistemov za zavarovanje glede na novo zakonodajo EU v zvezi s postopkom utemeljene ponudbe/odgovora in stroški postopka, ki jih krije oškodovanec;
Believes that Member States are also responsible for the good functioning of their national insurance systems in relation to EU legislation regarding the reasoned offer/reply procedure and legal costs borne by victims;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z natančnim spremljanjem učinkovitosti delovanja tržnih mehanizmov in o tem redno poroča Parlamentu;
Calls on the Commission to continue to closely monitor the effective functioning of market mechanisms and to report periodically to Parliament on this;
meni, da sama zahteva, da zavarovalec v primeru zamude plača predpisane obresti, ni kaznovalni instrument, in da mora zato Komisija glede tega izvajati večji nadzor in sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe, da zagotovi nemoteno delovanje trgov in učinkovito varstvo potrošnikov v vseh državah članicah;
Considers that the mere requirement that the insurer pay statutory interest in case of delay is not a punitive instrument, and that the Commission therefore needs to exercise greater control and take appropriate measures in this respect to ensure that in all Member States markets are working smoothly and consumers are effectively protected;
poudarja, da se morajo delovni odnosi med Komisijo, nacionalnimi organi, zavarovalništvom in potrošniki okrepiti za zagotovitev stalnih določb z natančnimi podatki o izboljšanju vzpostavljenega sistema;
Underlines that working relations between the Commission, national authorities, the insurance industry and consumers should be strengthened in order to ensure the constant provision of accurate data on the enforcement systems in place;
meni, da je treba uporabljati načelo subsidiarnosti v skladu s splošno veljavnim pristopom EU v zvezi s sankcijami ter da ni potrebno usklajevati nacionalnih določb o sankcijah;
Considers, in line with the generally established EU approach on sanctions, that the principle of subsidiarity should be applied and that there is no need for the harmonisation of national penalty provisions;
meni, da so nacionalni regulativni organi primernejši za zagotavljanje največje možne stopnje varstva potrošnikov na svojih nacionalnih trgih;
Considers that national regulatory bodies are better placed to guarantee the highest possible level of consumer protection on their national markets,
zato priporoča, da se določitev sankcij v skladu s postopkom utemeljene ponudbe/odgovora prepusti presoji držav članic, pri čemer se jim prepusti tudi izbira, katere vrste in stopnje določb so primerne;
Recommends therefore with reference to the reasoned offer/reply procedure to leave to the discretion of Member States the imposition of sanctions and the choice of which types and levels of provision are appropriate,
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo učinkovitost predvidenih sankcij, ki se izvršijo v primeru neupoštevanja trimesečnega roka za predložitev utemeljenega odgovora na odškodninski zahtevek ali utemeljene ponudbe za odškodnino;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that in the event of non-compliance with the three-month deadline for submitting a reasoned reply to the claim for compensation or a reasoned offer of compensation, the penalties introduced are effective;
meni, da je treba pred nalaganjem sankcij pozorno preučiti vzroke zaradi katerih zavarovalnice ne upoštevajo pravil, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejavnikov, ki niso odvisni od zavarovalnic samih; upa, da bo Komisija še naprej spremljala nacionalne trge in nudila svoj prispevek tistim nacionalnim organom, ki njeno pomoč potrebujejo;
Considers it advisable to carefully consider the reasons for the non-compliance of insurance companies before imposing penalties, taking account in particular of factors which do not depend on the companies themselves; hopes that the Commission will continue to monitor national markets, offering its input to those national authorities which call for its assistance;
ponovno poudarja pomembnost večjega zaupanja državljanov v delovanje sistema pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, ki se doseže z javnimi kampanjami in ostalimi ustreznimi ukrepi;
Reiterates the importance of boosting citizens" confidence in the functioning of the claims representative system by promoting it through public campaigns and by other appropriate measures;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj okrepijo zaupanje potrošnikov s spodbujanjem primernih ukrepov za večjo osveščenost in izkoriščanje informacijskih centrov za nacionalno zavarovanje, kot je zahteva, da morajo zavarovalci v svoje pogodbene informacije vključiti kontaktne podatke informacijskega centra v ustrezni državi članici;
Calls on Member States and the Commission to raise consumer confidence by encouraging appropriate measures that increase awareness and use of national insurance information centres, such as requiring insurers to include the contact details of the information centre in the Member State in question in their contractual information package;
poleg tega poziva države članice, naj v okviru predpogodbenih informacij od zavarovateljev zahtevajo, da potrošnikom zagotovijo celovite informacije o načinu delovanja sistema pooblaščenca za obravnavo odškodninskih zahtevkov, možnosti njegove uporabe in prednostih, ki jih ima ob njegovi uporabi zavarovana stranka;
Calls furthermore on Member States to require insurers, as part of the pre-contractual information package, to provide comprehensive information to consumers on how the claims representative system works and what are its uses and benefits to the insured party;