natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
V primeru morebitnih razhajanj lahko obe veji proračunskega organa pred končno odločitvijo o spremembi proračuna ali Komisija po potrebi predlagajo, da se skliče posebni trialog, na katerem bi skušali doseči kompromis o spornem vprašanju.
When appropriate and when there is a potential divergence, each arm of the budgetary authority, before taking its final position on the amending budget, or the Commission, may propose to convene a specific trilogue, to discuss the divergences and to try to reach a compromise.
Vsi predlogi sprememb proračuna, ki jih predstavi Komisija in še niso dokončno sprejeti, bodo sistematično vključeni na dnevni red trialogov, predvidenih v okviru letnega proračunskega postopka.
All draft amending budgets proposed by the Commission and not yet finally approved will be systematically on the agenda of the trilogues planned for the annual budgetary procedure.
Komisija predstavi predloge sprememb proračuna, obe veji proračunskega organa pa sporočita svoji stališči – če je mogoče, še pred začetkom trialoga.
The Commission will present the draft amending budgets and the two arms of the budgetary authority will, as far as possible, notify their respective position ahead of the trilogue.
Če je v okviru trialoga dosežen kompromis, se obe veji proračunskega organa zavežeta, da bosta med obravnavo spremembe proračuna v skladu s Pogodbo in njunima poslovnikoma upoštevali izid trialoga.
If a compromise is reached during a trilogue, each arm of the budgetary authority undertakes to consider the results of the trilogue when deliberating on the amending budget in accordance with the Treaty and its internal rules of procedure.
Sodelovanje obeh vej proračunskega organa po obravnavi
Cooperation after the reading of each arm of the budgetary authority
Če Evropski parlament odobri stališče Sveta brez predlogov sprememb, je sprememba proračuna tako sprejeta.
If the European Parliament approves without amendments the position of the Council, the amending budget shall be adopted.
Če Evropski parlament z večino svojih članov sprejme spremembe, se uporabi člen 314(4)(c) PDEU.
If the European Parliament adopts amendments by a majority of its component members, Article 314(4)(c) TFEU apply.
Vendar se pred sestankom spravnega odbora organizira trialog.
However, before the Conciliation Committee meets a trilogue will be called.
Če se v okviru trialoga doseže dogovor, se usklajevanje – če se z izidom trialoga strinjata obe veji proračunskega organa – zaključi z izmenjavo pisem, spravni odbor pa se tako ne sestane.
If an agreement is reached during the trilogue and subject to the agreement of each arm of the budgetary authority on the results of the trilogue, the conciliation will be closed by an exchange of letters without a meeting of the Conciliation Committee.
Če v okviru trialoga dogovor ni dosežen, se sestane spravni odbor, ki svoje delo organizira glede na dane razmere, da bi postopek odločanja po možnosti zaključil pred iztekom enaindvajsetdnevnega roka, določenega v členu 314(6) PDEU.
If no agreement is reached during the trilogue, the Conciliation Committee shall meet and organise its work in accordance with the circumstances, with a view of completing as much as possible the decision-making process before the twenty-one-day deadline laid down in Article 314(6) TFEU.
Spravni odbor lahko sestanek sklene z izmenjavo pisem.
The Conciliation Committee may conclude by an exchange of letters.
Čeprav začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe ne posega v določbe o prerazporeditvi sredstev, o katerih so se dogovorile Komisija in druge institucije (predvsem člena 22 in 23 finančne uredbe), institucije priznavajo, da je postal člen 24 finančne uredbe, v katerim je opredeljena razlika med obveznimi in neobveznimi odhodki, z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe nepotreben, saj je tovrstno razlikovanje v PDEU odpravljeno.
While provisions on transfers decided by the Commission and other institutions (notably articles 22 and 23 of the Financial regulation) are not affected by the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the institutions acknowledge that the provisions of Article 24 of the Financial Regulation, based on the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure, are overtaken by the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty due to the abolition of such distinction in the TFEU.
Institucije se strinjajo, da je treba do spremembe člena 24 finančne uredbe določiti operativni postopek za zagotovitev nemotene prerazporeditve sredstev.
Until the provisions of Article 24 of the Financial Regulation have been amended, the institutions agree on the need to define operational procedures to ensure a smooth handling of transfers.
Zato se strinjajo, da bodo začasno uporabljale sedanji člen 24(4) finančne uredbe, ki je po njihovem mnenju združljiv s pooblastili obeh vej proračunskega organa v skladu s PDEU.
To that end, they agree to apply provisionally current Article 24(4) of the Financial Regulation, which they acknowledge to be compatible with the powers of the two arms of the budgetary authority under the TFEU.
Postopek prerazporeditve v praksi poteka na naslednji način:
The transfer procedure shall run in practise as follows:
Komisija predlog istočasno predloži obema vejama proračunskega organa.
The Commission shall submit its proposal simultaneously to the two arms of the budgetary authority.
Proračunski organ odloča o prerazporeditvah sredstev v skladu z odstavkom (c), razen če ni drugače določeno v naslovu I drugega dela finančne uredbe.
The budgetary authority shall take decisions on transfers of appropriations as provided for in paragraph c), save as otherwise provided in Title I of part two of the financial regulation.
Svet (s kvalificirano večino) in Evropski parlament, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah, preučita predlog Komisije v šestih tednih od datuma, ko sta obe instituciji prejeli predlog za prerazporeditev.
Save in urgent circumstances, the Council, by a qualified majority, and the European Parliament, shall deliberate upon the Commission proposal within six weeks of the date on which the two institutions received the proposal for each transfer submitted to them.
Predlog prerazporeditve je sprejet, če po izteku šesttedenskega roka:
The transfer proposal shall be approved, if within the six-week period:
predlog odobrita obe veji proračunskega organa;
both arms approve it;
ena od vej proračunskega organa predlog odobri, druga veja pa o tem ne odloča;
one of the two arms approves it and the other refrains from acting;
nobena od vej proračunskega organa o tem ne odloča oziroma predloga Komisije izrecno ne zavrne.
both arms refrain from acting or have not taken a decision contrary to the Commission proposal.
Šesttedensko obdobje iz točke (d) se v naslednjih primerih skrajša na tri tedne, razen če ena od vej proračunskega organa ne zahteva drugače:
The six-week period referred to under point d) will be reduced to 3 weeks, unless one arm of the budgetary authority requests otherwise, when:
prerazporedi se manj kot 10 % sredstev iz zadevne vrstice in znesek prerazporeditve ne presega 5 milijonov EUR;
the transfer represents less than 10% of the appropriations of the line from which the transfer is made and does not exceed EUR 5 million;
prerazporedijo se samo odobritve plačil in skupni znesek prerazporeditve ne presega 100 milijonov EUR.
the transfer concerns only payment appropriations and the overall amount of the transfer does not exceed EUR 100 million.
Če je ena od obeh vej proračunskega organa spremenila predlog prerazporeditve, druga pa ga je odobrila ali sklenila, da o tem ne bo odločala, ali če sta obe veji spremenili predlog prerazporeditve, se šteje, da je odobren nižji znesek, ki ga je odobril bodisi Evropski parlament ali Svet, razen če Komisija umakne svoj predlog.
If one of the two arms of the budgetary authority has amended the transfer while the other approved it or refrains from acting, or if both arms have amended the transfer, the smaller amount approved either by the European Parliament or the Council shall be deemed approved, unless the Commission withdraws its proposal.
B7-0191 , 0194 , 0197 in 0198/2009
B7-0191 , 0194 , 0197 and 0198/2009
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in Listine Unije o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj Komisiji in Svetu z dne 9. novembra 2009 o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 ( O–0123/2009 – B7-0231/2009 , O–0122/2009 – B7–0230/2009 ), ter svoje razprave na plenarnem zasedanju dne 15. decembra 2009,
having regard to the questions of 9 November 2009 to the Commission and Council on the improvement needed in the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 ( O-0123/2009 - B7-0231/2009 , O-0122/2009 - B7-0230/2009 ) and to its debate in plenary on 15 December 2009,
ker Unija "posameznika postavlja v središče svojih dejavnosti z vzpostavitvijo državljanstva Unije in oblikovanjem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice" (preambula Listine o temeljnih pravicah) in ker ima "vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico dostopa do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije, ne glede na nosilec dokumenta" (člen 42 Listine o temeljnih pravicah),
whereas the Union 'places the individual at the heart of its activities, by establishing the citizenship of the Union and by creating an area of freedom, security and justice' (Preamble to the Charter of Fundamental Rights), and whereas 'any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium' (Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights),
ker Lizbonska pogodba spreminja pravno podlago uredbe o dostopu do dokumentov, hkrati pa tudi pravni okvir, v katerem se bo uredba uporabljala, zlasti kar zadeva odnos med institucijami Unije in njenimi državljani Mnenje pravne službe EP z dne 10. oktobra 2009, odstavek 3.
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon has modified 'not only the legal basis for the regulation governing access to documents, but also the legal context in which the regulation is to operate, in particular in terms of the relationship between the Union's institutions and the citizen' EP Legal Service opinion of 10 October 2009, paragraph 3.
ker bi moral ta odnos odslej temeljiti na demokratičnih načelih, očrtanih v novem naslovu II Pogodbe EU, kjer je navedeno, da "Unija spoštuje načelo enakosti svojih državljanov, ki so deležni enake obravnave s strani njenih institucij" (člen 9), ter da ima "vsak državljan pravico sodelovati v demokratičnem življenju Unije.
whereas that relationship should from now on be framed by the democratic principles outlined in the new Title II of the TEU, which stipulates that 'the Union shall observe the principle of the equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions' (Article 9) and that 'every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union.
Odločitve se sprejemajo kar najbolj odprto in v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani." (člen 10(3)),
Decisions shall be taken as openly and as closely as possible to the citizen' (Article 10(3)),
ker je gonilo popolne integracije Evropske skupnosti v Evropsko unijo ter odprave medvladne ureditve, ki je vse doslej veljala na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, pripravljenost držav članic "okrepiti demokratično in učinkovito delovanje institucij" (preambula PEU),
whereas the full integration of the European Community into the EU, as well as the abolition of the intergovernmental regime which still applied to judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters, was driven by the Member States' willingness 'to enhance further the democratic and efficient functioning of the institutions' (Preamble to the TEU),
ker morajo vse institucije, organi, uradi in agencije EU, ne le Parlament, Svet in Komisija (ki jih že zavezuje člen 255 predhodne Pogodbe ES), v skladu s tem novim pravnim okvirom odslej "pri svojem delu kar najbolj upoštevati načelo javnosti delovanja" (člen 15(1) PDEU),
whereas, in keeping with this new legal framework, all the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and not just Parliament, the Council or the Commission (which were already bound by Article 255 of the former EC Treaty), are now required to conduct their work as openly as possible (Article 15(1) TFEU),
ker sta v skladu s Pogodbo EU in sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije Kot je citirano v sodbi Sodišča v zadevi Turco (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P), Uredba (ES) 1049/2001 določa, da pomeni preglednost tesnejše sodelovanje državljanov v postopku odločanja in večjo zakonitost v upravi ter njeno učinkovitejše in odgovornejše ravnanje v razmerju do državljanov v demokratičnem sistemu.
whereas according to the TEU and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) As quoted by the ECJ in the Turco judgment (Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P), Regulation (EC)1049/2001 states that 'openness (...) enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system'.
javnost delovanja in udeležba civilne družbe nujna pogoja za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja institucij EU ter posledično učinkovitosti postopka odločanja,
openness and the participation of civil society are essential conditions for promoting good governance of the EU institutions and with it the effectiveness of the decision-making process,
ker imajo državljani v skladu s temeljnimi načeli demokracije pravico poznati in spremljati postopek odločanja, ter ker bi morale institucije EU in predstavniki držav članic, kadar nastopajo kot člani Sveta pred zakonodajnim in nezakonodajnim postopkom odločanja, med njim in po njem, zagotoviti večjo preglednost, da bi državljanom Unije in nacionalnim parlamentom omogočili celosten vpogled v to, kdo kaj počne in zakaj, ter spremljanje dejavnosti svojih predstavnikov,
whereas, in accordance with the basic principles of democracy, citizens have a right to know and to follow the decision-making process, and whereas enhanced transparency should be guaranteed by the EU Institutions and the Member States' representatives when acting as members of the Council before, during and after the legislative and non-legislative decision-making process in order to allow citizens of the Union and national parliaments to gain a comprehensive insight into who is doing what and why and to monitor the activities of their representatives,
ker institucije EU "dajejo državljanom in predstavniškim združenjem možnost izražanja in javne izmenjave mnenj glede vseh področij delovanja Unije" ter "vzdržujejo odprt, pregleden in reden dialog s predstavniškimi združenji in civilno družbo" (člen 11(1) in (2) PEU),
whereas the EU institutions 'shall give citizens and representative associations the opportunity to make known and publicly exchange their views in all areas of Union action' and 'shall maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society' (Article 11(1) and (2) TEU),
ker Lizbonska pogodba zahteva nadaljnje izboljšave v preglednosti in javnem dostopu do dokumentov; ker so v sodni praksi Sodišča Evropske unije že razjasnjene nekatere določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki jih je tako treba sedaj razlagati v smeri lažjega dostopa, kakor jih je razlagal tudi Parlament, ko je bila uredba sprejeta; ker Parlament ne bo sprejel nobenih zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije ali Sveta o zmanjševanju dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ali o krnjenju pravic državljanov do informiranosti,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon calls for further improvements to transparency and public access to documents; and whereas the case-law of the ECJ has already been most helpful in clarifying some of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, so that these must now be interpreted in line with the access-friendly understanding of these provisions espoused by Parliament when the regulation was adopted; whereas Parliament will not allow any legislative attempts by the Commission or the Council to reduce public access to documents or roll back citizens' rights to information,
ker je Sodišče Evropske unije potrdilo, da preglednost in dostop do informacij "omogoča[ta] javno razpravo o razhajanjih med različnimi mnenji ter daje[ta] institucijam večjo legitimnost v očeh evropskih državljanov in povečuje[ta] njihovo zaupanje.
whereas the ECJ has confirmed that openness and access to information 'contribute to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of citizens of the Union and increasing their confidence in them by allowing divergences between various points of view to be openly debated.
Pomanjkanje informacij in razprav lahko namreč pri državljanih vzbudi dvome o zakonitosti posameznega akta in legitimnosti celotnega postopka odločanja" (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, odstavek 59),
It is in fact rather a lack of information and debate which is capable of giving rise to doubts in the minds of citizens, not only as regards the lawfulness of an isolated act, but also as regards the legitimacy of the decision-making process as a whole' (Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, paragraph 59),
ker bi bilo treba sprejeti dolgo pričakovane pravne, finančne in operativne ukrepe, da bi zagotovili jasen in pravočasen dostop do vseh dokumentov, povezanih s posameznim zakonodajnim postopkom, najsi pripadajo notranjim službam ali zunanjim interesnim skupinam; ker bi lahko dostop do teh informacij omogočiti na medinstitucionalnem spletnem mestu, kjer bi bili povezani notranji registri institucij (kot je prenovljeno spletno mesto EUR-LEX, ki ga upravlja Urad za publikacije Evropske unije); ker bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti notranja pravila, treba pa bi bilo tudi hitro skleniti zavezujoče medinstitucionalne sporazume na podlagi člena 295 PDEU,
whereas long-awaited legal, financial and operational measures should be taken in order to ensure that all the documents relating to a specific legislative procedure are made accessible in a clear and timely manner, whether they originate from internal services or from outside interest groups; whereas this information could be made available on an interinstitutional Internet site linking the institutions' internal registers (such as the Publications Office of the European Union's revamped EUR-Lex site); and whereas internal rules should be amended accordingly and binding interinstitutional agreements negotiated expeditiously on the basis of Article 295 TFEU,
ker nove pristojnosti Evropske unije, zlasti Parlamenta, na področjih, kot so mednarodni sporazumi o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah, zahtevajo okrepitev pravnega okvira v zvezi s členoma 4 in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, tako da bo ustrezno zagotovljena varnost EU, hkrati pa bo Evropskemu parlamentu kot predstavniku evropskih državljanov omogočen popoln nadzor,
whereas the new powers of the European Union and, in particular, of Parliament in areas such as international agreements on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters require a stronger legal framework to be laid down in Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 so that EU security can be properly safeguarded whilst at the same time granting full oversight to Parliament as the representative of citizens of the Union,
ker je več držav članic EU že sprejelo svoj zakon o prostem dostopu do informacij ali splošna pravila o dostopu do informacij in dokumentov javnih institucij,
whereas several EU Member States have already adopted either 'freedom of information acts' or general rules governing access to the information and documents held by public institutions,
meni, da bi bilo treba zdaj, ko je začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, nujno posodobiti Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001, tako da se:
Considers that, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 should be urgently updated by:
razširi njeno področje uporabe, da bo zajela vse institucije, organe, urade in agencije EU, ki še niso zajete, kot so Evropski svet, Evropska centralna banka, Sodišče Evropske unije, Europol in Eurojust;
widening its scope to encompass all the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies currently not covered, such as the European Council, the European Central Bank, the ECJ, Europol and Eurojust;
spremenijo določbe, ki se nanašajo na zakonodajne in nezakonodajne postopke, v skladu z novimi opredelitvami v pogodbah;
amending the provisions dealing with legislative and non-legislative procedures in accordance with the new definitions contained in the Treaties;
na podlagi nedavne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije posodobijo pravila, ki urejajo zlasti ravnanje z notranjimi dokumenti, informacijami in podatki, da bi zagotovili širši dostop do mnenj pravnih služb, podanih v okviru postopka odločanja, dokumenti in informacijami, ki se nanašajo na delo predstavnikov držav članic v vlogi članov Sveta – vključno z vloženimi zakoni, predlogi in spremembami, zapisniki sej, njihovimi stališči in glasovanji v Svetu, tudi v delovnih skupinah in strokovnih skupinah – , dokumenti v zvezi z mednarodnimi sporazumi, varstvom osebnih podatkov in tržnimi interesi, vsebino registrov institucij itd.;
updating, on the basis of recent ECJ case-law, the rules which deal in particular with the treatment of internal documents, information and data, to ensure wider access to Legal Service opinions drafted within the framework of the decision-making process, documents and information relating to the work of Member State representatives when acting as members of the Council - including the acts, proposals and amendments tabled, transcripts of meetings, their positions and votes cast in the Council, including in its working groups and expert groups - documents relating to international agreements, the protection of personal data and commercial interests, the content of the institutions' registers, etc.;
odobri dostop do razpoložljivih informacij v institucijah EU, ki bo omogočil objektivno oceno izvajanja pravil, zakonov, ukrepov in programov EU v državah članicah; zagotovi večja finančna preglednost z zagotavljanjem podrobnih informacij o proračunu EU, njegovem izvajanju ter upravičenci do skladov in subvencij EU;
granting access to the information available in the EU institutions which makes it possible to evaluate objectively the implementation of EU rules, acts, measures and programmes in the Member States; ensuring greater financial transparency by providing detailed information concerning the EU budget, its implementation and the beneficiaries of EU funds and grants;
s preglednim postopkom ter ob doslednem upoštevanju demokratičnih načel in pravne države ter javnega in zasebnega interesa določijo splošna načela in omejitve v zvezi z dostopom do tajnih dokumentov, ki se jim izjemoma dodeli oznaka "strogo tajno", "tajno" ali "zaupno" ("'Très secret/Top Secret", "Secret" ali "Confidentiel"), da bi zaščitili najpomembnejše interese EU (člen 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001);
establishing, by means of a transparent procedure and in full compliance with democratic principles and the rule of law, the general principles and restrictions on grounds of public or private interest limiting access to documents which are exceptionally to be classified as 'Très secret/Top Secret', 'Secret' or 'Confidentiel' in order to protect the EU's essential interests (Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001);