natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker Pogodba o Ustavi za Evropo (Ustava) krepi vlogo Evropskega parlamenta na številnih zakonodajnih področjih, širi pooblastila proračunskega organa Evropskega parlamenta ter v členih I-55 in III-402(5) omogoča, da večletni finančni okvir postane evropski zakon Sveta, ki ga ta sprejme soglasno po spravnem postopku z Evropskim parlamentom in pridobitvi njegovega soglasja, ki ga slednji sprejme z večino svojih poslancev,
whereas the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the Constitution) strengthens the role of the European Parliament in many legislative areas, widens the scope of the Parliament's budgetary authority, and, in Article I-55 and in Article III-402(5), provides for the multi-annual financial framework to become a European law of the Council, adopted by unanimity after conciliation with and the consent of the European Parliament, to be given by a majority of its component members;
ker odstavek 26 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 predvideva podaljšanje trenutne finančne perspektive, razen če ga izrecno ne zavrne ena od podpisnic tega sporazuma,
whereas paragraph 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 provides for a prolongation of the current Financial Perspective, unless it is expressly denounced by one of the parties to this agreement;
ker v primeru nesklenitve medinstitucionalnega sporazuma Pogodba ES omogoča sprejetje letnih proračunov po določbah členov 272 in 273, če proračun ni sprejet na začetku finančnega leta,
whereas, in the absence of an interinstitutional agreement, the EC Treaty allows for the adoption of annual budgets under the provisions of Articles 272 and 273 if the budget has not been adopted by the beginning of the financial year;
ker je nova Komisija uradno odobrila predloge prejšnje Komisije glede strukture, trajanja in stopnje finančnih sredstev po razdelkih na leto izdatkov nove finančne perspektive in vseh zakonodajnih predlogov, ki so skupaj znani kot "Prodijev paket",
whereas the new Commission officially endorsed the proposals of the former Commission regarding the structure, the duration and the level of financial resources per year and per heading of expenditure of the new Financial Perspective and all the legislative proposals known collectively as the "Prodi Package";
ker je v svoji prej omenjeni resoluciji z dne 22. aprila 2004 Evropski parlament poudaril, da "ne bo finančne perspektive brez sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom o finančnem paketu, ker obstoječa pogodba ne predvideva obveznosti finančne perspektive in predvideva samo letne proračune",
whereas, in its above-mentioned resolution of 22 April 2004, the European Parliament stressed that "there will be no financial perspective without an agreement between the European Parliament and the Council on the financial package, as the existing Treaty foresees no obligation to have a financial perspective and only provides for annual budgets";
ker sredstva iz razdelka DDV in BDP (ob njihovem nastanku uvedena kot prihodki, ki dopolnjujejo vire lastnih sredstev EU) postopoma postali glavni vir financiranja proračuna Skupnosti; ker so skupaj z ureditvijo shem odstopanj, dodane trenutnemu sistemu lastnih sredstev, naredile sistem bolj zapleten, manj pregleden za državljane in vedno manj pravičen ter vodile v sistem financiranja, katerega rezultat so nesprejemljive razlike med državami članicami,
whereas the VAT and GDP resources (which were intended at the time when they were established as revenues complementary to traditional EU own resources) have gradually become the principal source of financing for the Community budget; whereas, together with the derogation regimes which have been added to the current own-resources system, they have only made it more complex, more opaque for citizens and increasingly less equitable and have led to a financing system which has resulted in unacceptable inequalities between Member States;
ker so sklepi Evropskega sveta decembra 2004 potrdili "Prodijev paket" kot delovno osnovo Sveta, ki se je dogovoril za institucionalen dialog v okviru rednih stikov z Evropskim parlamentom,
whereas the conclusions of the December 2004 European Council confirmed the "Prodi Package" as the working basis for the Council, which agreed on institutional dialogue through regular contacts with the European Parliament;
ker je v sklepih Evropskega sveta decembra 2004 povezava med finančno perspektivo in vprašanjem virov lastnih sredstev in korekcijskim mehanizmom jasno določena,
whereas in the conclusions of the December 2004 European Council, the link between the Financial Perspective and the issue of own resources and the correction mechanism is clearly established;
ker je v zadnjih šestih mesecih začasni odbor:
whereas, over the last six months, the Temporary Committee:
izvedel poglobljeno analizo predlogov Komisije,
has conducted an in-depth analysis of the Commission's proposals,
tesno sodeloval z vsemi stalnimi odbori, katerih mnenja so bila temeljito preučena,
has worked in close co-operation with all the permanent committees whose opinions have been carefully scrutinised,
z zanimanjem sledil načinu dela z "gradniškimi" delovnimi metodami nizozemskega predsedstva in imel pogoste in konstruktivne stike z luksemburškim predsedstvom,
has followed with interest the "building blocks" working method followed by the Dutch Presidency and had frequent and constructive contacts with the Luxembourg Presidency,
določil pozitivne politične prednostne naloge z namenom določitve pogajalskega izhodišča Evropskega parlamenta,
has identified positive political priorities with a view to determining the European Parliament's negotiating position,
v skladu z njegovimi pooblastili podal predloge za trajanje, strukturo in finančna sredstva naslednje finančne perspektive,
has made proposals for the duration, the structure and the financial resources of the next Financial Perspective, in accordance with the mandate it received;
ker Ustava predvideva možnost uvedbe novih kategorij virov lastnih sredstev Unije in ukinitev katere od obstoječih kategorij,
whereas the Constitution provides for the possibility of introducing new categories of EU own resources and of abolishing an existing category,
Splošni okvir
General context
vztraja, da bi bilo treba širitvi Evropske unije nameniti dovolj finančnih sredstev, ki bodo zadostila njenim rastočim političnim ambicijam in ustrezala vse večjim odgovornostim doma in v tujini; nadalje vztraja, da morajo vsi proračunski izdatki EU dodati evropsko vrednost javnim izdatkom držav članic ter da je treba strogo spoštovati načelo subsidiarnosti pri odločitvah glede izdatkov na področju neizključne pristojnosti, kar še posebej velja za kriterij, da je dejavnost EU zaradi svojega obsega ali učinka bolj ustrezna za uresničevanje ciljev Unije;
Insists that the enlarging European Union should have appropriate financial resources to match the scale of its rising political ambitions and to meet its growing responsibilities at home and abroad; insists further that all expenditure from the EU budget should be designed to add European value to the public expenditure of Member States, and that the principle of subsidiarity should be strictly respected with regard to spending decisions in the field of non-exclusive competence - in particular the criterion that EU action does, by reason of its scale or effects, better achieve the objectives of the Union;
v interesu dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, poenostavitve in demokratične odgovornosti zahteva izboljšanje in poenostavitev mehanizmov finančnega nadzora na ravni institucij in držav članic, da bi se vzpostavila dejanska jasna odgovornost za vse izdatke EU;
In the interests of sound financial management, simplification and democratic accountability, demands improvements in and simplification of the mechanisms of financial control both at the level of the institutions and within the Member States, so as to ensure real public accountability for all EU spending;
opominja, da je finančna perspektiva finančni okvir, katerega cilj je zagotoviti razvoj prednostnih nalog EU v okviru finančne discipline in ni večletni proračun, določen za sedem let; poudarja, da finančna perspektiva ostaja priporočilo in mora biti zato dovolj prilagodljiv, da izraža srednjeročne politične ambicije, ter mora zagotoviti finančna sredstva, ki so potrebna za učinkovito in ustrezno soočanje s prihodnjimi izzivi, kot to določa Pogodba; je odločen v celoti uporabiti svoja pooblastila iz člena 272 Pogodbe, ki določa, da se izdatki Evropske unije odobrijo na podlagi letnega proračunskega postopka;
Recalls that the Financial Perspective is a financial framework aiming to secure the development of EU priorities in a context of budgetary discipline, and is not a multi-annual budget set for seven years; points out that the Financial Perspective remains a reference and therefore must provide the necessary flexibility to reflect medium-term political ambitions and provide the financial resources needed in order to enable future challenges to be met effectively and fairly, as laid down in the EC Treaty; is determined to make full use of the powers granted to it under Article 272 of the Treaty, pursuant to which an annual budgetary procedure is established for the purpose of approving the expenditure of the European Union;
ugotavlja, da je nova Barrosova Komisija v celoti potrdila predloge, ki jih je predstavila Prodijeva Komisija v zadnjih mesecih njenega mandata; vendar zavrača sistem, ki zavezuje izvoljene in izvršilne organe Evropske unije za tri zaporedne mandate;
Notes that the new Barroso Commission has fully endorsed the proposals presented by the Prodi Commission over the last months of its mandate; however, rejects a system which binds the elected and executive bodies of the European Union over three consecutive mandates;
se zaveda težkega političnega, gospodarskega in socialnega stanja v številnih državah članicah, vendar opozarja, da se je proračun EU povečal za 8,2 % med letoma 1996 in 2002, medtem ko je bilo povprečno povečanje v državnih proračunih (EU-15) 22,9 %; ugotavlja, da iz MacDougallovega poročila Poročilo predstavljeno leta 1977 s strani ekspertov na zahtevo Komisije.
Is aware of the difficult political, economic and social context in several Member States, but recalls that the EU budget has increased by 8.2% between 1996 and 2002, while the average increase in national budgets (EU-15) has been 22.9%; notes that the MacDougall report Report presented in 1977 by a group of experts at the Commission's request.
izhaja, da bi evropski proračun moral znašati od 2 % do 2,5 % BDP držav članic; izkorišča priložnost, da poudari, da je zgornja meja virov lastnih sredstev, določena leta 1993 za 15 držav članic, ostala od takrat nespremenjena, namreč 1,31 % BND EU za odobritve za prevzem obveznosti in 1,24 % BND EU za odobritve plačil; opozarja, da je sedanja raven proračuna EU manj kot 2,5 % celotne javne porabe Unije v primerjavi s povprečjem 47 % BND EU za skupno javno porabo;
considers that the European budget should amount to 2% to 2.5% of Member States' GDP; takes the opportunity to point out that the ceiling of own resources decided in 1993 for 15 Member States has remained unchanged since then, i.e. 1.31% of EU GNI for commitment appropriations and 1.24% of EU GNI for payment appropriations; recalls that the level of the EU budget currently accounts for under 2.5% of aggregate public spending in the Union compared to an average of 47% of EU GNI for total public spending;
ugotavlja, da lahko stroške širitve, ki jih je treba obravnavati na pošten in pravičen način, brez težav prevzame 15 starih držav članic ter da se morajo upoštevati kot najnižji stroški, upoštevajoč politične, socialne in gospodarske koristi, ki jih predstavlja ponovna združitev Evrope za vso Unijo;
Considers that the costs of enlargement, which must be tackled in a fair and equitable way, can be perfectly assumed by the 15 old Member States and that they must be considered as a minimum, taking into account the political, social and economic benefits that the reunification of Europe represents for the whole Union;
je prepričan, da lahko finančna perspektiva omogoči uravnotežen razvoj finančnih sredstev, dodeljenih Uniji, pod pogojem, da:
Is convinced that the Financial Perspective can allow for balanced development of the financial resources allocated to the Union provided that:
se uporabijo za dejavnosti z resnično evropsko dodano vrednostjo, jasno določenimi prednostnimi nalogami in preglednostjo za državljane,
they are used for actions with real European added value, clearly defined priorities and visibility for citizens,
optimizirajo osredotočanje in dopolnjevanje z dejavnostjo, ki poteka na državni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, da bi čim bolj omejili obremenitev davkoplačevalcev,
they optimise concentration and complementarity with actions run at national, regional and local level to limit as much as possible the burden on taxpayers,
se porabijo v skladu s pravili dobrega finančnega poslovanja, z osredotočenjem na uspešnost in učinkovitost; ugotavlja, da so lahko izdatki na evropski ravni viri prihrankov na nacionalni ravni, še zlasti zato, ker omogočajo ekonomijo obsega in lahko ustvarjajo prihodke na nacionalni ravni;
they are spent under rules of sound financial management, focusing on efficiency and effectiveness; notes that expenditure effected at European level may give rise to savings at national level, in particular because such expenditure makes for economies of scale or may generate revenue at national level;
poudarja, da je razprava o finančni perspektivi tesno povezana z vprašanjem virov lastnih sredstev, korekcijskim mehanizmom in številnimi oblikami sofinanciranja in finančnih instrumentov ter potrebe po prilagoditvi obstoječega sistema, kot je to potrdil Evropski svet v svojih sklepih decembra 2004; obžaluje, da Komisija vzporedno z novo finančno perspektivo ni predstavila bolj ambicioznih predlogov za nadomestitev trenutnega sistema vzporedno z novo finančno perspektivo;
Stresses that the debate on the Financial Perspective is closely linked to the issue of own resources, the correction mechanism and various forms of co-financing and financial instruments and the need to adapt the existing system, as acknowledged by the European Council in its conclusions of December 2004; regrets that the Commission did not present more ambitious proposals to replace the current system in parallel with the new Financial Perspective;
bo v svojem končnem glasovanju upošteval, da Svet priznava potrebo po temeljiti reformi obstoječega sistema virov lastnih sredstev za pravično delitev novih sredstev med državami članicami in tako vračanje k prvotnemu načelu financiranja skupnih politik s pristnimi viri lastnimi sredstvi skozi pregleden, pravičen in demokratičen sistem, ki bi moral začeti veljati najpozneje na začetku naslednje finančne perspektive;
Will take account, in its final vote, of the way in which the Council acknowledges the need for a thorough reform of the current own resources system on the basis of which new expenditure can be shared out fairly among the Member States and, subsequently, a return can be made to the original principle of the funding of common policies with genuine own resources using a transparent, equitable and democratic system which should enter into force at the latest at the beginning of the following Financial Perspective;
ugotavlja, da bo začetek veljavnosti Ustave z uvedbo soodločanja spremenil zakonodajni postopek za številne predloge; se zaveda, da bi bilo nemogoče predvideti Ustavo v pravnem smislu pred koncem postopka ratifikacije; poziva Svet, da se dogovori o prijateljskem sporazumu za zaščito zakonodajnih pooblastil Parlamenta in uvede prilagoditvene klavzule za zakonodajne akte, katerih postopki se bodo spremenili po začetku veljavnosti Ustave;
Notes that the entry into force of the Constitution will modify the legislative procedure for a number of proposals, introducing co-decision; is aware that it would be impossible to anticipate the Constitution in legal terms before the end of the ratification procedure; urges the Council to agree on a gentleman's agreement to safeguard the legislative powers of the European Parliament and to introduce a revision clause for legislative acts whose procedure will change after the Constitution comes into force;
ob upoštevanju velike politične pomembnosti naslednje finančne perspektive,
in view of the utmost political importance of the next Financial Perspective,
ob upoštevanju, da Ustava predvideva, da mora prihodnjo zakonodajo Sveta, ki vsebuje večletni finančni okvir, odobriti Evropski parlament z večino svojih poslancev,
taking into consideration the fact that the Constitution requires that the future law of the Council containing the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) be approved by the Parliament by a majority of its members,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bo naslednja finančna perspektiva zajela tudi obdobje po začetku veljave Ustave in bo perspektiva zelo verjetno imela vlogo večletnega finančnega okvira, kar bo omogočilo sprejetje prvega letnega proračuna ob spoštovanju pravil Ustave,
and bearing in mind that the next Financial Perspective will go beyond the entry into force of the Constitution and will very likely be considered as fulfilling the function of the MFF to allow the adoption of the first annual budget under the regime of the Constitution,
bi se Parlament moral v sporazumu obvezati, da bo odobril naslednjo finančno perspektivo, le če jo bo odobrila večina njegovih članov;
the European Parliament should only consent to commit itself in an agreement on the next Financial Perspective if this is approved by a majority of its members;
opominja, da v skladu s trenutnimi pogodbami finančna perspektiva nima uradnega statusa in se lahko vzpostavi le na prostovoljni osnovi s soglasjem Evropskega parlamenta; nadalje opominja, da se bo v primeru, če sporazum ni dosežen, uporabila Pogodba ES glede postopka sprejemanja letnih proračunov; poudarja, da ne bo dal soglasja k naslednji finančni perspektivi, če Svet ne bo upošteval njegovih prednostnih nalog;
Recalls that under the current Treaties a Financial Perspective does not have a formal status and can only be established with the approval of the European Parliament on a voluntary basis; recalls further that, if no agreement is reached, the EC Treaty will be applied for the purpose of regulating the adoption of annual budgets; stresses that it will not agree on the next Financial Perspective if its priorities are not taken into consideration by the Council;
v določeni meri pozdravlja predloge Komisije za naslednji finančni okvir 2007-2013 in z njim povezane zakonodajne predloge, ki so del "Prodijevega paketa" in naj bi zamenjali večino trenutne zakonodaje, ki se izteče leta 2006, kot priložnost za razširjeno Unijo, da še naprej razvija nov politični program; po poglobljeni analizi njegovega začasnega odbora in 17 odborov, ki so mu predložili mnenja, meni, da so bili predlogi Komisije deležni omejene podpore in so kot taki sprejemljiva osnova za analizo in prihodnja pogajanja; kljub temu opozarja Svet na nekatere politične prednostne naloge, kjer je evropska dodana vrednost za Unijo in njene državljane izredno pomembna;
Welcomes to some extent the Commission's proposals on the next financial framework 2007-2013 and the related legislative proposals, which form part of the "Prodi Package" and are intended to replace most of the current legislation ending in 2006, as an opportunity for the enlarged Union to further develop a new political agenda; after an in-depth analysis by its Temporary Committee and by the 17 committees which delivered opinions to it, considers that the Commission proposals have received qualified support and, as such, are an acceptable basis for analysis and future negotiations; nevertheless draws the Council's attention to certain political priorities where European added value for the Union and its citizens is of the utmost importance;
meni zato, da je pomembno, da se finančna perspektiva hitro potrdi in se lahko v celoti začne izvajati 1. januarja 2007 ter s tem prepreči prekinitev dejavnosti EU, še posebej v zvezi z zakonodajnimi predlogi Komisije;
Regards it as essential, moreover, that the Financial Perspective be approved promptly so that it can be fully operational from 1 January 2007, thereby preventing any hiatus in the work of the EU, in particular as regards the Commission's legislative proposals;
Del I Politični izzivi
Part I Policy challenges
Bolj konkurenčna in kohezivna Evropa
A more competitive and cohesive Europe
poudarja, da so znanstvene raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in inovacije v središču gospodarstva, ki temelji na znanju, in so ključni dejavniki za rast in trajnostni razvoj, konkurenčnost podjetij, zaposlovanje in doseganje ciljev Lizbonske strategije; meni, da bi raziskovalna prizadevanja morala biti povečana in okrepljena na ravni EU, s čimer bi se razvili centri odličnosti, prinesla dodana vrednost industriji, MSP in državljanom Evrope, spodbujalo sodelovanje med zasebnimi in javnimi udeleženci, zlasti v zvezi z raziskovalnimi infrastrukturami ter spodbujanjem javno-zasebnega partnerstva; poudarja, da mora ta finančna perspektiva veliko prispevati k dosegi ciljev, določenih v okviru Evropskega sveta v Barceloni 2002 za povečanje izdatkov raziskav in razvoja na 3 % BND EU do leta 2010, in da mora to biti vključeno v prihodnje finančne perspektive; meni, da bi morala biti iz razdelka raziskovanja predvidena ustrezna sredstva za izvajanje vesoljskega programa in da bi morali zakonodajni instrumenti in finančna sredstva biti deležni koristi iz prilagoditvene klavzule po začetku veljavnosti Ustave; vztraja, da bi evropsko raziskovalno območje moralo dejansko vključevati vseh 25 držav članic; meni, da je ključnega pomena za evropsko konkurenčnost in tudi za socialno kohezijo odpraviti digitalne razlike med regijami in socialnimi skupinami ter da noben državljan ni izključen iz informacijske družbe;
Stresses that scientific research, technological development and innovation are at the heart of the knowledge-based economy and are key factors for growth and sustainable development, the competitiveness of companies, employment, and attainment of the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy; considers that research efforts should be boosted and consolidated at EU level, developing centres of excellence, bringing added value to industry, SMEs and the citizens of Europe, and promoting cooperation between private and public actors, especially regarding research infrastructure and the encouragement of public-private partnerships; stresses that this Financial Perspective must make a substantial contribution towards reaching the target established at the 2002 Barcelona European Council for an increase in R&D expenditure to 3% of EU GNI by 2010, and that this must be factored into future Financial Perspectives; considers that provision should be made for appropriate resources for the implementation of the Space Programme within the envelope for research, and that legislative instruments and financial resources should benefit from a revision clause once the Constitution enters into force; insists that the European Research Area should effectively include all 25 Member States; regards it as vital both for European competitivity and for social cohesion that the digital gap between regions and social groups should be bridged and that no EU citizen must be excluded from the information society;