natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dne 30. novembra 2000 je Svet sprejel skupni program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah Komisije in Sveta UL C 12, 15.1.2001, str.
On 30 November 2000, the Council adopted a joint programme of the Commission and the Council of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters OJ C 12, 15.1.2001, p.
Dne 20. decembra 2002 je Komisija sprejela Zeleno knjigo o postopku za evropski plačilni nalog ter ukrepih za poenostavitev in pospešitev sodnih postopkov v sporih majhne vrednosti.
The Commission adopted a Green Paper on a European order for payment procedure and on measures to simplify and speed up small claims litigation on 20 December 2002.
Zelena knjiga je začela posvetovanje o možnih ciljih in značilnostih enotnega ali usklajenega evropskega postopka za izterjavo nespornih zahtevkov.
The Green Paper launched a consultation on the possible objectives and features of a uniform or harmonised European procedure for the recovery of uncontested claims.
Medtem ko vse države članice poskušajo rešiti vprašanje množičnih izterjav nespornih zahtevkov, večina z določitvijo poenostavljenega postopka za plačilni nalog, se tako vsebina nacionalne zakonodaje kot tudi izvajanje domačih postopkov močno razlikujeta.
Whilst all Member States try to tackle the issue of mass recovery of uncontested claims, the majority of them by devising a simplified order for payment procedure, both the content of national legislation and the performance of the domestic procedures vary substantially.
Poleg tega trenutno obstoječi postopki pogosto niso dopustni ali praktični v čezmejnih primerih.
Furthermore, the currently existing procedures are frequently either inadmissible or impracticable in cross-border situations.
Postopek, določen s to uredbo, služi kot dodatno in neobvezno sredstvo za tožečo stranko, ki lahko uporabi tudi postopek, predpisan z nacionalno zakonodajo.
The procedure established by this Regulation serves as an additional and optional means for the claimant, who remains free to resort to a procedure provided for by domestic law.
V skladu s tem ta uredba ne nadomešča
Accordingly, this Regulation neither replaces nor harmonises
obstoječih mehanizmov za izterjavo nespornih
the existing mechanisms for the recovery of uncontested
po nacionalnem pravu
under national
Evropski plačilni nalog bi moral biti na voljo za vse civilne denarne zahtevke, pogodbene in nepogodbene, razen premoženjskih pravic iz zakonske zveze
The European order for payment should be available for all civil pecuniary claims, contractual and non-contractual, with the exception of rights in property arising out of a
, oporoke ali dedovanja
matrimonial relationship, wills or succession,
, kjer se sodišča pogosto celo, če ni ugovora, ne morejo zanesti na trditve tožeče stranke, temveč morajo preveriti dejstva po uradni dolžnosti.
where even in default of objections courts often cannot rely on the claimant's allegations but have to examine the facts of their own motion.
Postopek bi moral v največji možni meri temeljiti na uporabi standardnih obrazcev pri obveščanju med sodiščem in strankami za lažje upravljanje in omogočanje uporabe avtomatske obdelave podatkov.
The procedure should be based, to the largest extent possible, on the use of standard forms in the communication between the court and the parties in order to facilitate its administration and enable the use of automatic data processing.
V tem kontekstu bi moralo biti za tožečo stranko obvezno, da navede nekatere dokaze, ki bodo zagotovo dokazali pravilnost njenih trditev, ne da bi ji bilo treba dejansko predložiti listinske dokaze sodišču.
In that context, it should be mandatory for the claimant to cite some evidence he could rely on to prove the correctness of his allegations without having to actually submit documentary evidence to the court.
preuči vlogo, vključno z vprašanjem pristojnosti in opisom dokazov, na podlagi podatkov iz obrazca.
should examine the application, including the issue of jurisdiction and the description of evidence, on the basis of the information provided in the form.
To sodišču omogoča, da predhodno preuči glavna dejstva
This would allow the court to examine prima facie
in med drugim izloči zahtevke, ki so očitno neutemeljeni in nesprejemljivi.
and inter alia to exclude clearly unfounded or inadmissible claims.
Ni nujno, da ta pregled opravi sodnik.
The examination does not necessarily need to be carried out by a judge.
Pravno sredstvo proti zavrnitvi vloge za evropski plačilni nalog ni dovoljeno, to pa ne izključuje možnosti pravnega sredstva zoper odločbo pred sodiščem iste stopnje.
Whereas no review will lie against rejection of an application for a European order for payment this does not preclude the possibility of a review of the decision at the same level of jurisdiction.
Pravno sredstvo v izjemnih primerih ne pomeni, da ima tožena stranka novo priložnost za nasprotovanje zahtevku.
Review in exceptional cases does not mean that the defendant is given a second chance to object to the claim.
Med postopkom odločanja o pravnem sredstvu glavnih dejstev zahtevka ne bi smeli ocenjevati širše od razlogov, ki izhajajo iz izrednih okoliščin, na katere se sklicuje tožena stranka.
During the review procedure the merits of the claim should not be evaluated beyond the grounds resulting from the exceptional circumstances invoked by the defendant.
Evropski plačilni nalog, ki se izda, kadar odgovor na tožbo ni vložen, bi moral biti takoj izvršljiv proti toženi stranki.
The European order for payment to be issued in the absence of a statement of defence should be immediately enforceable against the defendant.
Zoper nalog bi moral obstajati ugovor, ki bi na splošno imel enake posledice kot odgovor na tožbo.
It should be subject to opposition which should entail essentially the same consequences as a statement of defence.
Ob odsotnosti vložitve ugovora bi moral biti status plačilnega naloga enak končni sodbi, izdani v rednem civilnem postopku.
In default of the lodging of a statement of opposition the order for payment should have the same status as a final judgment handed down in ordinary civil proceedings.
Za izračunavanje časovnih omejitev se uporablja Uredba (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71 Sveta z dne 3. junija 1971 o določitvi pravil glede rokov, datumov in iztekov rokov
For the purposes of calculating the time limits Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits
Iz standardnega obrazca mora biti toženi stranki razvidno, da se roki izračunavajo v skladu z Uredbo (EGS, Euratom) št. 1182/71, ob upoštevanju državnih praznikov države članice, v kateri je sodišče.
The standard form should inform the defendant that time-limits are to be calculated in accordance with Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71, taking into account the public holidays of the Member State in which the court is situated.
Vložitev vloge za evropski plačilni nalog pomeni tudi plačilo sodnih taks.
Lodging of an application for a European order for payment implies the payment of any applicable court fees.
Sodišča morajo upoštevati vse druge pisne oblike ugovora, če je ta jasno izražen.
The courts should take into account any other written form of opposition if it is expressed in a clear manner.
Koncepta 'rednega civilnega postopka' v tej uredbi ni nujno treba razlagati v smislu nacionalne zakonodaje.
The concept of "ordinary civil proceedings" in this Regulation should not necessarily be interpreted within the meaning of national law.
Medtem ko skupne sodne takse za evropski plačilni nalog in redni civilni postopek v primeru ugovora ne presegajo sodnih taks za redni civilni postopek brez vnaprejšnjega evropskega plačilnega naloga, ti stroški ne vključujejo na primer odvetniških stroškov ali stroškov zaradi vročitve listin s strani subjekta, ki ni sodišče.
Whereas the combined court fees of a European order for payment and of the ordinary civil proceedings in the event of a statement of opposition should not exceed the court fees of ordinary civil proceedings without a preceding European order for payment, those costs do not include, for example, lawyers" fees or costs of service of documents by an entity other than a court.
Ko se države članice odločajo, katera sodišča bodo pristojna za izdajo evropskega plačilnega naloga, ustrezno upoštevajo potrebo po zagotovitvi dostopa do sodišča.
Member States, when deciding which courts are to have jurisdiction to issue a European order for payment, should give due account to the need to ensure access to justice.
Ta uredba ne vpliva na izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
This Regulation does not affect the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 2245/2004 (UL L 381, 28.12.2004, str.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2004 (OJ L 381, 28.12.2004, p.
ali Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in zunajsodnih pisanj v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah v državah članicah UL L 160, 30.6.2000, str.
or of Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p.
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana zlasti v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah kot splošna načela prava Skupnosti.
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as general principles of Community law.
Ukrepe, potrebne za izvajanje te uredbe, je treba sprejeti v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uveljavljanje izvedbenih pooblastil, dodeljenih Komisiji UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
The measures necessary for the implementation of this Regulation should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sta v skladu s členom 3 Protokola o stališču Združenega kraljestva in Irske, ki je priložen k Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, predložili uradno obvestilo, da želita sodelovati pri sprejetju in uporabi te Uredbe.
United Kingdom and Ireland, in accordance with Article 3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, have given notice of their wish to take part in the adoption and application of this Regulation.
poenostaviti in pospešiti sodne postopke ter zmanjšati njihove stroške za čezmejne primere o nespornih denarnih zahtevkih z oblikovanjem postopka za evropski plačilni nalog in
to simplify, speed up and reduce the costs of litigation in cross-border cases concerning uncontested pecuniary claims by creating a European order for payment procedure; and
omogočiti prost pretok evropskih plačilnih nalogov po vseh državah članicah z določitvijo minimalnih standardov, ob spoštovanju katerih postanejo vsi vmesni postopki v državah članicah izvršbe pred priznavanjem in izvrševanjem nepotrebni.
to permit the free circulation of European orders for payment throughout all Member States by laying down minimum standards whose observance renders unnecessary any intermediate proceedings to be brought in the Member State of enforcement prior to recognition and enforcement.
Ta uredba tožeči stranki ne preprečuje, da nadaljuje izterjavo v smislu člena 5 z uporabo drugega veljavnega postopka države članice ali v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti.
This Regulation shall not prevent a claimant from pursuing a claim within the meaning of Article 5 by making use of another procedure available under the law of a Member State or under Community law.
Ta uredba se
This Regulation shall apply,
v čezmejnih primerih
in cross-border cases, to
uporablja za civilne in gospodarske zadeve, ne glede na vrsto sodišča.
civil and commercial matters, whatever the nature of the court or tribunal.
Ne velja pa predvsem za dohodkovne, carinske ali upravne zadeve
It shall not extend, in particular, to revenue, customs or administrative matters
premoženjske pravice iz zakonske zveze,
rights in property arising out of a matrimonial
oporoke in dedovanja
relationship, wills and succession
socialno varnost
social security
zahtevke iz nepogodbenih obveznosti, razen če:
claims arising from non-contractual obligations, unless:
so bili predmet sporazuma med strankami ali obstaja priznanje dolga ali
they have been the subject of an agreement between the parties or there has been an admission of debt; or
se nanašajo na odplačane dolgove, ki izhajajo iz solastnine.
they relate to liquidated debts arising from joint ownership of property.
Za namene te uredbe je čezmejni primer tisti, v katerem ima vsaj ena od strank stalno prebivališče v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri je sodišče, ki je prejelo vlogo.
For the purposes of this Regulation, a cross-border case is one in which at least one of the parties is domiciled or habitually resident in a Member State other than the Member State of the court seised.
Stalno prebivališče se določi v skladu s členoma 59 in 60 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001.
Domicile shall be determined in accordance with Articles 59 and 60 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.
Ustrezni trenutek za odločitev, ali gre za čezmejni spor, nastopi takrat, ko se vloži vloga za evropski plačilni nalog v skladu s to uredbo.
The relevant moment for determining whether there is a cross-border case is the time when the application for a European order for payment is submitted in accordance with this Regulation.
"država članica izvora": država članica, v kateri se izda evropski plačilni nalog;
"Member State of origin": the Member State in which a European order for payment is issued;
"država članica izvršbe": država članica, v kateri se zahteva izvršba evropskega plačilnega naloga;
"Member State of enforcement": the Member State in which enforcement of the European order for payment is sought;
"sodišče": organ v državi članici, pristojen za evropski plačilni nalog in z njim povezane zadeve;
"court": any authority in the Member States with competence regarding the European order for payment or any other related matters;
"sodišče izvora": sodišče, ki izda evropski plačilni nalog.
"court of origin": the court which issues the European order for payment.
Evropski postopek za plačilni nalog
European order for payment procedure
zahtevkov v določenem znesku, ki zapadejo v času, ko se vlaga vloga za evropski plačilni
claims for a specific amount that have fallen due at the time when the application for a European order for payment is
Za namene izvajanja te uredbe se pristojnost določi v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti z Uredbo (ES) št. 44/2001.
For the purposes of applying this Regulation, jurisdiction shall be determined in accordance with the relevant rules of Community law, in particular Regulation (EC) No 44/2001.
Če pa se zahtevek nanaša na pogodbo, ki jo je sklenila oseba, potrošnik, za čigar namene se lahko šteje, da so zunaj njegove dejavnosti ali poklica, in če je potrošnik tožena stranka, imajo pristojnost samo sodišča v državi članici, v kateri ima tožena stranka stalno prebivališče v smislu člena 59 Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001.
However, if the claim relates to a contract concluded by a person, the consumer, for a purpose which can be regarded as being outside his trade or profession, and if the defendant is the consumer, only the courts in the Member State in which the defendant is domiciled, within the meaning of Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, shall have jurisdiction.
Vloga za evropski plačilni nalog
Application for a European order for payment
Vloga za evropski plačilni nalog se predloži na standardnem obrazcu iz
An application for a European order for payment shall be made using the standard form
Vloga določa:
The application shall state:
imena in naslove strank in
the names and addresses of the parties, and,
njihovih zastopnikov, kjer je to primerno, ter
where applicable, their representatives, and of
sodišča, pred katerim se vloga poda;
the court to which the application is made;
znesek zahtevka
the amount of the claim
, vključno z glavnico in, kjer je to primerno, obrestmi ter pogodbenimi kaznimi
, including the principal and, where applicable, interest and contractual penalties
članice izvora
that interest is demanded
razloge za pristojnost; in
the grounds for jurisdiction; and
čezmejni značaj primera v skladu s členom 3.
the cross-border nature of the case in accordance with Article 3.
Tožeča stranka v vlogi potrjuje, da so podatki resnični po njeni najboljši vednosti in da se zaveda, da se vsaka namerno lažna izjava ustrezno kaznuje po zakonih države članice izvora.
In the application, the claimant shall state that the information provided is true to the best of the claimant's knowledge and belief and he acknowledges that any deliberate false statement could lead to appropriate sanctions under the law of the Member State of origin.
V prilogi k vlogi lahko tožeča stranka opozori sodišče na to, da nasprotuje prehodu na redni civilni postopek v smislu člena 17 v primeru ugovora tožene stranke.
In an annex to the application the claimant may indicate to the court that he opposes a transfer to ordinary civil proceedings within the meaning of Article 17 in case of opposition by the defendant.
To tožeči stranki ne preprečuje, da bi sodišče o tem obvestila naknadno, vendar vsekakor pred izdajo naloga.
This does not prevent the claimant from informing the court thereof subsequently, but in any event before the order is issued.
Vlogo mora podpisati tožeča stranka ali njen zastopnik, kjer je to primerno.
The application must be signed by the claimant or, where applicable, by his representative.
Kadar se vloga predloži v elektronski obliki v skladu z odstavkom 5, mora biti podpisana v skladu s členom 2, točka 2, Direktive 1999/93/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. decembra 1999 o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis
Where the application is submitted in electronic form in accordance with paragraph 5, it shall be signed in accordance with Article 2, point 2 of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures
UL L 13, 19.1.2000, str.
OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p.
Vendar pa elektronski podpis ni potreben, če in v obsegu, v katerem obstaja alternativni komunikacijski sistem na sodiščih države članice izvora, ki je dostopen določeni skupini vnaprej registriranih in preverjenih uporabnikov in ki omogoča varno prepoznavanje teh uporabnikov.
However, such electronic signature shall not be required if and to the extent that an alternative electronic communications system exists in the courts of the Member State of origin which is available to a certain group of pre-registered authenticated users and that permits the identification of those users in a secure manner.
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o takih komunikacijskih sistemih.
Member States shall inform the Commission of such communication systems.
Proučitev vloge
Examination of the application
Sodišče, ki prejme vlogo
for a European order for payment
Kadar sodišče namerava zavrniti vlogo, ker niso izpolnjene zahteve iz
Where the court considers a rejection of the application due to a failure to fulfil the requirements of
, lahko odobri tožeči stranki možnost, da vlogo dopolni ali popravi.
it may give the claimant the opportunity to complete or rectify the application.
Dopolnitve in popravki vloge
Completion and rectification of the application
Če zahteve, določene v členu 7, niso izpolnjene in če ni očitno, da je vloga neutemeljena in nesprejemljiva, sodišče da tožeči stranki možnost, da dopolni ali popravi vlogo.
If the requirements set out in Article 7 are not met and unless the application is clearly unfounded or inadmissible, the court shall give the claimant the opportunity to complete or rectify the application.
Sodišče uporabi standardni obrazec iz Priloge.
The court shall use the standard form in the Annex.
Kadar sodišče zahteva, da tožeča stranka dopolni ali popravi vlogo, določi rok, ki se mu zdi primeren glede na okoliščine.
Where the court requests the claimant to complete or rectify the application, it shall specify a time-limit it deems appropriate in the circumstances.
Sodišče lahko po lastnem preudarku podaljša rok.
The court may at its discretion extend the time-limit.
Sprememba vloge
Modification of the application
Če samo del vloge izpolnjuje zahteve, določene v členu 8, sodišče o tem obvesti tožečo stranko na standardnem obrazcu iz Priloge.
If the requirements set out in Article 8 are met for only a part of the application, the court shall inform the claimant thereof, using the standard form in the Annex.
Tožeča stranka je pozvana, da sprejme ali zavrne predlog za evropski plačilni nalog o plačilu zneska, ki ga je določilo sodišče, in je obveščena o posledicah svoje odločitve.
The claimant shall be invited to accept or refuse a proposal for a European order for payment for the amount specified by the court and shall be informed of the consequences of his decision.
Tožeča stranka odgovori z vrnitvijo standardnega obrazca, ki ga je poslalo sodišče, v roku, ki ga je določilo sodišče v skladu s členom 9(2).
The claimant shall reply by returning the standard form sent by the court within a time-limit specified by the court in accordance with Article 9(2).
Če tožeča stranka sprejme predlog sodišča, to izda evropski plačilni nalog v skladu s členom 12 za del vloge, ki jo je tožeča stranka sprejela.
If the claimant accepts the court's proposal, the court shall issue a European order for payment, in accordance with Article 12, for that part of the application accepted by the claimant.
Nacionalna zakonodaja ureja posledice glede preostanka prvotnega zahtevka.
The consequences with respect to the remaining part of the initial claim shall be governed by national law.
Če tožeča stranka ne pošlje svojega odgovora v roku, ki ga je določilo sodišče, ali zavrne predlog sodišča, sodišče v skladu s členom 11 vlogo za evropski plačilni nalog v celoti zavrne.
If the claimant fails to send his reply within the time-limit specified by the court or refuses the court's proposal, the court shall reject the application for a European order for payment in its entirety, in accordance with Article 11.
Zavrnitev vloge
Rejection of the application
Sodišče vlogo v celoti zavrne
The court shall reject the
tožeča stranka ne pošlje svojega odgovora v roku, ki ga je določilo sodišče v skladu s členom 9(2); ali
the claimant fails to send his reply within the time-limit set by the court under Article 9(2); or
tožeča stranka ne pošlje svojega odgovora v roku, ki ga je določilo sodišče, ali zavrne predlog sodišča v skladu s členom 10(3); ali
the claimant fails to send his reply within the time-limit specified by the court or refuses the court's proposal, in accordance with Article 10(3); or
zahteve, določene v členih 2, 3, 5, 6 in 7 niso izpolnjene; ali
the requirements set out in Articles 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 are not met; or
zahteva je očitno neutemeljena ali nesprejemljiva.
the claim is clearly unfounded or inadmissible.
Zoper zavrnitev
No appeal shall lie against the rejection of
vloge ni
the application
ne preprečuje tožeči stranki, da
shall not prevent the claimant from
evropskega plačilnega naloga
European order for payment