natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi se morala humanitarna pomoč Unije izvajati preko humanitarnih organizacij, ki v celoti upoštevajo dobro prakso in pri svojem humanitarnem delu spoštujejo načela odgovornosti, uspešnosti in učinkovitosti;
Considers that EU humanitarian aid should be implemented via humanitarian organisations which fully adhere to good practice and are committed to promoting accountability, efficiency and effectiveness in implementing humanitarian action;
Učinkovitost, kakovost in odgovornost
Effectiveness, quality and accountability
meni, da je odgovornost do skupnosti, ki jih prizadenejo nesreče in so glavni upravičenci, jedro ocenjevanja učinkovitosti humanitarne pomoči ter da je treba v soglasju to načelo ustrezno izraziti; zlasti meni, da mora EU nevladne organizacije spodbujati k izvajanju prostovoljnih pobud za ugotavljanje odgovornosti;
Believes that accountability to disaster-affected communities as primary beneficiaries lies at the heart of any evaluation of humanitarian aid effectiveness, and that the Consensus should duly reflect this principle; considers in particular that the EU should encourage voluntary accountability initiatives carried out by NGOs;
meni, da bi morala Unija spodbujati uporabo smernic in načel medagencijskega stalnega odbora v zvezi s humanitarnimi dejavnostmi, usmeritvenih načel o notranji razseljenosti, kodeks ravnanja za Rdeči križ, Rdeči polmesec in nevladne organizacije v programih za odzive na nesreče iz leta 1994 in humanitarne listine (SPHERE);
Considers that the EU should promote the use of Inter-Agency Standing Committee guidelines and principles on humanitarian activities, the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement, the 1994 Code of Conduct for the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Disaster Relief and the Humanitarian Charter (SPHERE);
Uporaba sredstev in zmogljivosti civilne zaščite ter vojske zunaj ozemlja EU
Use of civil protection and military assets and capabilities outside the territory of the EU
ponovno trdi, da morajo biti sredstva in zmogljivosti vojaške in civilne zaščite razporejeni na način, ki dopolnjuje in podpira delo humanitarnih organizacij, hkrati pa morajo biti omejeni na primere ali območja, na katerih lahko zagotovijo dejansko dodano vrednost, in sicer na podlagi temeljite ocene razmer;
Reaffirms that EU civil protection and military assets and capabilities must be deployed in a way which complements and supports the work of humanitarian organisations and limited to those cases or areas where they can provide real added value, and after a thorough prior analysis of the situation;
meni, da bi morala EU jasno opredeliti vlogo in pooblastila civilne zaščite in vojske v humanitarnih operacijah ter poskrbeti za njuno spoštovanje, zlasti v konfliktnih razmerah, v katerih sta nepristranskost in neodvisnost temeljnega pomena za omogočanje varnega dostopa do žrtev nesreč in učinkovite dostave humanitarne pomoči;
Considers that the EU should clearly define and ensure respect for the roles and mandates of the civil protection and military actors in humanitarian operations, particularly in conflict situations where impartiality and independence are crucial to guarantee safe access to disaster victims and the efficient delivery of humanitarian aid;
verjame, da se mora EU zavezati dejavnemu zavzemanju, da bi smernice MCDA in smernice iz Osla izvajali vsi udeleženci humanitarnih operacij, ter zagotoviti, da se ne zmanjša vrednosti glavnih načel teh smernic;
Believes that the EU should commit itself to actively advocate the application of the MCDA and Oslo Guidelines by all actors involved in humanitarian operations and to ensure that the main principles contained therein are not weakened;
meni, da je treba v skladu z mednarodnimi smernicami pomoč državnih sredstev civilne zaščite v zapletenih izrednih razmerah nuditi zgolj v izjemnih primerih, vojaška sredstva in zmogljivosti v podporo humanitarnim operacijam pa je treba uporabiti le kot zadnjo možnost, in sicer v obeh primerih vedno pod vodstvom humanitarnih organizacij Združenih narodov, pač glede na načelo, da je v konfliktnih razmerah treba ravnati pazljivo;
Considers that, in accordance with international guidelines, recourse to State-owned civil protection assets in complex emergencies should be the exception, while military assets and capabilities in support of humanitarian operations should be used only as a 'last resort', and, in both cases, always under the guidance of UN humanitarian organisations and according to the principle of conflict sensitivity;
Spodbujanje zmanjševanja tveganja nesreč in pripravljenosti na nesreče
Promoting disaster risk reduction and disaster preparedness
ugotavlja, da narašča število in pogostost naravnih nesreč ter njihov uničevalni vpliv; pri tem se zaveda, da je vse težje razlikovati med naravnimi nesrečami in nesrečami, ki jih povzroči človek; priznava, da je tveganje v enaki meri pogojeno s človeškimi dejavnostmi in pomanjkljivim načrtovanjem kot z naravnimi nesrečami; poziva k časovno jasno opredeljeni strategiji za vključevanje zmanjšanja tveganja nesreč v vso razvojno in humanitarno pomoč EU v skladu s Hjoškim akcijskim okvirom; se zaveda, da lahko razvojna pomoč brez izvajanja strategije zmanjšanja tveganja nesreč nenamerno poveča izpostavljenost nesrečam;
Notes the growing number and frequency of natural disasters and their devastating impact; recognises as well the increasing difficulty of distinguishing natural from man-made disasters; acknowledges that risks are determined just as much by human activity and lack of planning as by natural hazards; calls for a time-bound strategy to mainstream Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) into all EU development and humanitarian aid, guided by the HFA; recognises that without DRR mainstreaming, development interventions bear the risk of inadvertently increasing vulnerability to disasters;
opozarja na velikanski izziv, ki ga bodo v prihodnosti sprožile podnebne spremembe v obliki izrednih vremenskih pogojev in upadanja naravnih virov, kar bo za seboj potegnilo hude varnostne in razvojne posledice od večje ranljivosti revnih in nasilnih konfliktov do usihanja naravnih virov in masovnih migracijskih tokov; opozarja, da so zaradi podnebnih sprememb ogrožena prizadevanja za zmanjšanje revščine in izpolnitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja, zato poziva, da se zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč in prilagoditveni ukrepi vključijo v strategije za zmanjševanje revščine (strateški dokumenti za zmanjševanje revščine); poudarja, da morajo intervencije za zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč s ciljem omejevanja vzrokov ranljivosti, če naj bodo učinkovite, pomembno sovpadati s prizadevanji za ublažitev podnebnih sprememb in prilagajanje nanje;
Notes the immense future challenge of climate change, in the form of extreme weather conditions and dwindling natural resources, with serious security and development implications, ranging from increased vulnerability of the poor, violent conflicts over diminishing natural resources, as well as large-scale migration flows; underlines the threats imposed by climate change to poverty reduction and the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals and calls for the integration of DRR and adaptation measures into poverty reduction strategies (PRSPs or Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers); emphasises that in order to be effective, DRR interventions aimed at reducing the causes of vulnerability must have significant overlaps with climate change mitigation and adaptation;
poudarja, da bi morale strategije za zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč, temelječe na Hjoškem akcijskem okviru, dolgoročno podpirati prizadevanja lokalnih skupnosti in oblasti za manjšo izpostavljenost nesrečam, kot je bilo to predlagano po izkušnjah mehanizma financiranja in programa za pripravljenost na nesreče GD ECHO (DIPECHO);
Stresses that DRR strategies, based on the HFA, should support action by local communities and authorities in a long-term approach to reducing vulnerability to disasters, as suggested by the experience of the funding mechanism and disaster preparedness programme of DG-ECHO (DIPECHO);
poziva EU, da v okviru humanitarne pomoči nameni vsaj 10 % dodatnih proračunskih sredstev za namene zmanjšanja tveganja nesreč in da bistveno poveča vire za zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč v okviru proračunskih sredstev za razvojno pomoč; vztraja, da je treba srednjeročno in dolgoročno spremeniti pristop mednarodne humanitarne pomoči in bistveno okrepiti zmanjšanje tveganja nesreč;
Calls on the EU to allocate at least 10 per cent of additional new funding to humanitarian assistance budgets for reducing disaster risks and to significantly increase resources for DRR within development aid budgets; insists on the need to change in the medium and long term the approach of international humanitarian aid to a marked reinforcement of DRR;
Okrepitev povezave z ostalimi instrumenti pomoči
Reinforcing the link to other aid instruments
poziva EU, da skupaj z mednarodnimi humanitarnimi udeleženci oblikuje smernice za okrepitev usklajevanja nujne pomoči, rehabilitacije in razvoja, s čimer bi se preprečile mogoče pomanjkljivosti med stopnjami nujnega ukrepanja, rehabilitacije in razvoja na podlagi dobre prakse in pridobljenih izkušenj ob upoštevanju različnih pristopov; meni, da bi morala Unija ta pristop osnovati na načelu "neškodovanja" in desetih načelih "boljše ponovne izgradnje"; poudarja, da je cilj premostiti vrzeli med humanitarno in razvojno pomočjo s čim boljšo uporabo različnih finančnih instrumentov EU;
Calls on the EU, in collaboration with the international humanitarian actors, to develop guidelines aimed at reinforcing the link between emergency relief, rehabilitation and development (LRRD), in order to avoid potential gaps between the emergency relief response and the rehabilitation and development phases, taking as a basis best practice and lessons learnt; considers that the EU should base this approach on the 'do no harm' principles and the 10 'build back better' principles; stresses the objective of filling the gap between humanitarian aid and development assistance by making best use of the full range of EU funding instruments;
se zaveda tudi, da razvojni in humanitarni delavci ne poznajo dobro in se pomanjkljivo zavedajo povezanosti med humanitarno pomočjo in razvojem; EU poziva, da si kot prednostno nalogo zastavi pripravo programov usposabljanja s tega področja za zaposlene;
Recognises further that knowledge and awareness of the links between humanitarian aid and development is lacking both among development workers and among humanitarian aid staff; calls on the EU to prioritise staff training programmes in this area;
poudarja potrebo po pojasnitvi povezave med ukrepi, ki jih Komisija podpira na podlagi instrumenta stabilnosti za preprečevanje, obvladovanje in reševanje kriz (kot so razoroževanje, demobilizacija, razminiranje, ponovno vključevanje razseljenih oseb/beguncev itd.), ter ukrepi, ki jih istočasno izvaja GD ECHO ob upoštevanju svojega mandata in humanitarnih načel;
Stresses the need to clarify the relations between activities supported by the Commission via the stability instrument for crisis prevention, management and resolution (such as disarmament, demobilisation, mine clearance, reintegration of displaced populations/refugees, etc.), and the concomitant activities carried out by DG ECHO in line with its mandate and with humanitarian principles;
Izvajanje soglasja glede humanitarne pomoči
Implementation of the Consensus on Humanitarian Aid
poziva, da se v soglasje glede humanitarne pomoči vključi obsežen in konkreten načrt za izvajanje, vključno s časovnim načrtom za glavne projekte in pobude, ki bi jih sprožili donatorji EU v naslednjih petih letih;
Calls for the inclusion in the Consensus of a broad and concrete road map for its implementation, including timelines for major projects and initiatives to be undertaken by all EU donors over the next five years;
poziva k rednemu ocenjevanju izvajanja in razvoja soglasja, pri čemer mora v celoti in ne enaki ravni kot druge institucije sodelovati Parlament; poziva k ustanovitvi posebnega medinstitucionalnega organa in strukturiranega dialoga s Parlamentom na tem področju;
Calls for a regular assessment of the implementation and progress of the Consensus, involving Parliament fully and on an equal footing with the other institutions in this exercise; calls for the establishment of an appropriate interinstitutional structure and a structured dialogue with Parliament in this area;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. novembra 2007 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za varstvo tal in spremembi Direktive 2004/35/ES ( KOM(2006)0232 – C6-0307/2006 – 2006/0086(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 November 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC ( COM(2006)0232 – C6-0307/2006 – 2006/0086(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2006)0232 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2006)0232 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0307/2006 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0307/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko, Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in Odbora za pravne zadeve( A6-0410/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0410/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti člena 175(1) Pogodbe;
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 175(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije║,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission
UL C 146, 30.6.2007, str.
OJ C 146, 30.6.2007, p.
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. novembra 2007.
Position of the European Parliament of 14 November 2007.
Tla so bistven neobnovljiv vir, pri katerem je lahko degradacija zelo hitra, medtem ko sta lahko nastajanje in regeneracija tal zelo izjemno počasni.
Soil is essentially a non-renewable resource in that the degradation rates can be rapid whereas the formation and regeneration processes are extremely slow.
Ta izjemno dinamičen sistem opravlja veliko funkcij in nalog, ki so odločilnega pomena za človeške dejavnosti in preživetje ekosistema.
It is a very dynamic system which performs many functions and delivers services vital to human activities and to the survival of ecosystems.
Te funkcije so proizvodnja biomase, skladiščenje, filtriranje in preoblikovanje hranilnih snovi in vode, tla so vir biološke raznovrstnosti, temelj večine človeških dejavnosti, skladišče ogljika in arhiv geološke ter arheološke dediščine.
These functions are biomass production, storing, filtering and transforming nutrients and water, hosting the biodiversity pool, acting as a platform for most human activities, providing raw materials, acting as a carbon pool and storing the geological and archeological heritage.
Degradacija tal ali izboljšava tal znatno vplivajo tudi na druga področja skupnega interesa Skupnosti, kot so
Soil degradation or soil improvements have a major impact on other areas of Community interest, such as surface water and groundwater
površinskih voda in podtalnice, zdravje ljudi
, human health
, podnebne spremembe,
, climate change,
degradacija ali
degradation or
varstvo narave in biološke raznovrstnosti ter varnost živil.
protection of nature and biodiversity, and food safety.
Tla so naravni vir skupnega interesa, ki je pod vse večjimi okoljskimi obremenitvami in ga je treba kot takega zaščititi pred degradacijo.
Soil is a natural resource of common interest which is under increasing environmental pressure and is to be protected from degradation in its own right.
zajema cilje za zaščito naravnih virov in pospeševanje trajnostne rabe tal.
includes the objective of protecting natural resources and promoting a sustainable use of soil.
zemeljski usadi in poplave. ▐
landslides and flooding. ▐
obravnavi degradacije tal
addressing soil degradation
Zakonodaja Skupnosti ▐, na primer na področju odpadkov, kemikalij, preprečevanja in nadzora industrijskega onesnaževanja, podnebnih sprememb, voda, razvoja kmetijstva in podeželja
Community legislation, for instance in the fields of waste, chemicals, industrial pollution prevention and control, climate change, water, and agriculture and rural development,
, ki določa skupna načela in cilje za varstvo in trajnostno rabo tal v Skupnosti.
, providing for common principles and objectives aiming at protection and sustainable use of soil in the Community.
Skupen okvir
A common framework
ter regionalnim in lokalnim organom omogočal, da bodo varovali svoja tla brez
and the regional and local authorities to protect their soils without
izkrivljanja konkurence med gospodarskimi subjekti.
distortion of competition between economic operators.
Tak okvir bi bilo treba sprejeti na podlagi celostne analize statusa tal in ukrepov, ki jih države članice že izvajajo.
Such a framework should be adopted on the basis of a comprehensive survey of soil status and of the measures already taken in Member States.
in ker se bo kljub obstoječi zakonodaji Skupnosti verjetno še povečala, je treba sprejeti direktivo, ki bo omogočala varstvo tal v vseh državah članicah, vendar samo
and since, despite existing Community legislation, soil degradation is likely to increase, there is a need for a directive that enables the protection of soil in all Member States
Kmetijstvo je vedno pozitivno vplivalo na vzdrževanje strukture tal in njenih značilnosti, je nepogrešljiv mehanizem za ohranjanje organske kakovosti tal ter omogoča ohranjanje rastlinske plasti in preprečuje dezertifikacijo.
Agriculture has always contributed positively to maintaining the structure of soil and its characteristics, and is an indispensable mechanism for conserving the organic quality of the soil and for helping to preserve the vegetal layer and avoid desertification.
Vmesni pregled skupne kmetijske politike bi moral določiti usmerjene ukrepe za ohranjanje in izboljševanje rodovitnosti tal, vsebnosti organskih snovi in sposobnosti tal za skladiščenje ogljika.
The mid-term review of the common agricultural policy should establish target measures for maintaining and improving soil fertility, organic matter content and carbon sequestration capacity.
Da bi se izognili kakršnemu koli prekrivanju z veljavno okoljsko zakonodajo in upoštevaje načelo subsidiarnosti pri izvajanju okoljske pogojenosti, bi morala vsaka država članica imeti možnost odločiti se za njeno izvajanje, če pri tem upošteva značilnosti svojega podnebja, kmetijstva in tal.
In order to avoid any overlap with existing agricultural and environmental legislation, and given the subsidiarity principle related to the implementation of ecoconditionality, each Member State should be able to decide to implement ecoconditionality taking into account its own climate, agriculture and soil characteristics.
V nasprotju z zrakom in vodo so tla v Skupnosti pretežno v zasebni lasti.
In contrast to air and water, soil is mainly privately owned in the Community.
Rodovitnost tal je osnova življenja.
Fertility of the soil is the basis of life.
Cilj vseh kmetijskih dejavnosti mora biti ohranjanje in izboljšanje te rodovitnosti.
The aim of all agricultural activity must be to maintain and improve that fertility.
zbuja vse večjo zaskrbljenost, ker lahko ovira funkcije tal, ki omogočajo storitve osnovnega pomena za človekove dejavnosti in preživetje ekosistemov, ne da bi prispevala k trajnostnemu razvoju v skladu s prenovljeno strategijo EU za trajnostni razvoj, sprejeto s strani Evropskega sveta 15. in 16. junija 2006.
increasingly of concern because it can inhibit those soil functions that deliver services vital to human activities and to the survival of ecosystems without contributing to sustainable development in accordance with the Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy as adopted by the European Council of 15/16 June 2006.
ustrezni ukrepi, ki bodo omejili pozidavo tal
needed to limit soil sealing
na osnovi razvojnih projektov, ki bi lahko bistveno okrnili funkcije tal in ki ne prispevajo k doseganju trajnostnega razvoja.
arising from development projects which are likely to significantly impede soil functions and which do not contribute to the achievement of sustainable development.
Države članice bi morale določiti spodbude, da bi se za mestni in industrijski prostorski razvoj namenjalo zemljišča, ki se že uporabljajo za industrijske in mestne namene, in bi morale omejiti uporabo zelenih površin.
Member States should establish incentives for industrial and urban spatial development to occur on sites already used for industrial and urban purposes, and should limit the use of greenfield sites.
Države članice bi morale tudi zagotoviti, da so ureditveni okviri za načrtovanje rabe zemljišč naklonjeni obnavljanju, in razmisliti o uvedbi hitrih postopkov odobritve načrtov obnove.
Member States should also ensure that regulatory frameworks for land use planning are favourable to rehabilitation and should consider establishing fast-track planning authorisation procedures for remediation.
pozidava, bi morale
in such circumstances,
države članice
Member States should
poskrbeti za ublažitev njenih vplivov, na primer tako, da
ensure its effects are mitigated, for example by providing
Zakisanost tal je v nekaterih delih Skupnosti velik problem, ki ga je treba obravnavati.
Soil acidification is an important problem in certain parts of the Community, which needs to be addressed.
Zato bi morale države članice z ustreznimi ukrepi zagotoviti, da se zaradi neprimernih praks rabe tal ne zmanjša njihova vrednost pH.
It is therefore necessary for Member States to take appropriate measures to ensure that inappropriate land use practices do not cause soil pH to decrease.
Usmerjena in učinkovita politika varstva tal
A targeted and efficient soil protection policy
zahteva skupne cilje glede varstva tal.
requires common soil protection objectives.
Vendar morajo imeti države članice ter regionalni in lokalni organi hkrati možnost sprejemati ukrepe na primerni ravni in stopnji ter opredeljevati prednostna območja na osnovi znanstvenih spoznanj o lokalnih lastnosti tal, procesu njihove degradacije ter okoljskih, ekonomskih in socialnih okoliščinah.
At the same time, however, Member States and regional and local authorities need to be able to take measures at the appropriate level and scale, and to identify priority areas based on scientific knowledge about the local soil characteristics, soil degradation processes and the environmental, economic and social circumstances.
in kodeksih dobre prakse
and codes of good practice
in s sredstvi
and funding
in upada
and the decline of
bi tudi morala
it should also
sodelovanje pri izvajanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o boju proti dezertifikaciji
enhance cooperation in the implementation of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification
Konvencije o biološki raznovrstnosti,
the Convention on Biological Diversity
Okvirne konvencije ZN o spremembi podnebja in Kjotskega protokola,
, the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol
katere podpisnica je Skupnost, in bo pospešila izvajanje teh mednarodnih okoljskih sporazumov.
to which the Community is a party, and will enhance the implementation of these international environmental agreements.