natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju resolucije generalne skupščine Združenih narodov z dne 21. decembra 2010 o položaju človekovih pravic v Islamski republiki Iran,
– having regard to the United Nations General Assembly resolution of 21 December 2010 on the situation of human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran,
A. ker je bila ugledna odvetnica za človekove pravice Nasrin Sotude obsojena na enajstletno zaporno kazen na podlagi obtožb, da je ogrožala državno varnost, bila članica Centra za varstvo človekovih pravic, ni nosila hedžaba (islamsko oblačilo) med sporočilom na videoposnetku in da je širila propagando proti režimu; ker so ji bila prepovedana tudi opravljanje odvetniške dejavnosti in potovanja dvajset let po prestali kazni,
A. whereas Nasrin Sotoudeh, a prominent Iranian human rights lawyer, was sentenced to 11 years in jail on charges of ‘acting against national security’, ‘membership of the Centre for Human Rights Defenders’, not wearing hejab (Islamic dress) during a videotaped message, and ‘propaganda against the regime’; whereas she was also banned from practising law and travelling for 20 years after completion of her sentence,
B. ker je bila Nasrin Sotude, materi dveh otrok, 4. septembra 2010 odvzeta prostost in je bila dolgo časa zaprta v samici, kjer so jo domnevno mučili ter ji prepovedali stike z njeno družino in odvetnikom, in ker je po gladovni stavki, s katero je protestirala proti razmeram, v katerih je v zaporu živela, in proti kršenju pravic do poštenega sojenja, skoraj umrla,
B. whereas Sotoudeh, a mother of two children, was arrested on 4 September 2010, held for long periods in solitary confinement, reportedly tortured and denied contact with her family and lawyer, and whereas she came close to death after a hunger strike to protest against her prison conditions and violations of due process,
C. ker je policija 15. januarja čez noč pridržala njenega moža Rezo Kandana ter ga izpustila, ko je zanj tretja oseba plačala varščino, in ker ga zaradi zavzemanja za ženine pravice še vedno preganjajo,
C. whereas Sotoudeh’s husband, Reza Khandan, was summoned by the police on 15 January and detained overnight, released on a third-person guarantee and is under prosecution because of his advocacy on behalf of his wife,
D. ker je bila Nasrin Sotude odvetnica nizozemske državljanke Zahre Bahrami, ki ji je bila po demonstracijah na praznik Ašura 27. decembra 2009 odvzeta prostost in je bila nedavno obsojena na smrt,
D. whereas Nasrin Sotoudeh has been the lawyer of the Dutch national Zahra Bahrami, who was arrested after the Ashura protests on 27 December 2009 and has been recently sentenced to death,
E. ker je obsodba Nasrin Sotude del sistematičnega napada na odvetnike, ki se zavzemajo za človekove pravice v Iranu, in zagovornike teh pravic, med katerimi je tudi soustanovitelj odbora poročevalcev o človekovih pravicah in vidni borec za človekove pravice Šiva Nazarahari, ki je bil 7. januarja 2011 obsojen na štiriletno zaporno kazen in štiriinsedemdeset udarcev z bičem, ter ugledni odvetnik Mohamed Seifzade, ki je bil 30. oktobra 2010 obsojen na devetletno zaporno kazen in desetletno prepoved opravljanja odvetniške dejavnosti; ker odvetnik Mohamed Olijafar prestaja enoletno zaporno kazen zaradi zavzemanja za svoje stranke; ker kazenski pregon v kratkem grozi tudi drugim zagovornikom človekovih pravic, in sicer Mohamedu Aliju Dadkaju, Abdolfataju Soltaniju in Hutanu Kianu,
E. whereas Sotoudeh’s sentence is part of a systematic assault on human rights lawyers and activists in Iran, which includes the sentencing on 7 January 2011 of Shiva Nazarahari, co-founder of Committee of Human Rights Reporters and a prominent activist, to four years in prison and 74 lashes and the sentencing on 30 October 2010 of a prominent lawyer, Mohammad Seifzadeh, to nine years in prison and a ten-year ban from practising law; whereas human rights lawyer Mohammad Oliyafar is serving a one-year sentence for his advocacy on behalf of his clients; whereas other human rights defenders facing imminent prosecution in Iran are Mohammad Ali Dadkhah, Abdolfattah Soltani and Houtan Kian,
F. ker je več kot leto po demonstracijah na praznik Ašura decembra 2009 na stotine iranskih državljanov, ki jim je bila odvzeta prostost, še vedno zaprtih, oblasti pa so še vse leto ljudem odvzemale prostost, zlasti na študentski dan 7. decembra 2010, in ker je po poročilih Amnesty International sedemdeset študentov še vedno pridržanih,
F. whereas, over one year after the Ashura demonstrations in December 2009, hundreds of Iranian citizens who were arrested still linger in prison and the authorities have continued to make arrests throughout the year, in particular on the occasion of Students’ Day of 7 December 2010, and whereas according to reports by Amnesty International over 70 students are still detained,
G. ker so še vedno preganjani tudi novinarji in avtorji spletnih dnevnikov – menda je trenutno zaprtih več kot trideset novinarjev – ter celo ugledni predstavniki iranske kulture, na primer filmski režiser Jafar Panahi, ki je bil decembra 2010 obsojen na šestletno zaporno kazen in dvajsetletno prepoved ustvarjanja filmov,
G. whereas journalists and bloggers also continue to be targeted, with reportedly over 30 journalists behind bars at the moment, and even acclaimed representatives of Iranian culture, such as film director Jafar Panahi, who in December 2010 was banned from film-making for 20 years as well as sentenced to 6 years’ imprisonment, are denied freedom of expression,
H. ker so izsiljena priznanja, mučenje in slabo ravnanje z zaporniki, odrekanje spanca, osamitev, nezakonito pridržanje, izvajanje krutega, nečloveškega in ponižujočega ravnanja, fizična zloraba, tudi spolno nasilje, in nekaznivost državnih agentov še vedno razširjeni, zaradi česar obstajajo veliki dvomi o pravičnosti in preglednosti pravnih postopkov v tej državi,
H. whereas forced confessions, torture and ill-treatment of prisoners, sleep deprivation, solitary confinement, clandestine detention, cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment, physical abuse, including sexual violence, and impunity for State agents continue to be widespread in Iran, giving rise to serious doubts as to the fairness and transparency of the judicial process in that country,
I. ker namesto, da bi preiskali izvensodne usmrtitve, žalujočim sorodnikom umorjenih grozi odvzem prostosti, kakor v primeru Mahdija Ramazanija, ki so ga 10. decembra 2010 z groba njegovega sina odpeljali v pripor in mu določili izredno visoko varščino, ki je ne more plačati,
I. whereas, instead of extrajudicial killings being investigated, the mourning relatives of those who have been killed may face arrest, as in the case of Mahdi Ramazani, who was taken into custody at the grave site of his son in December 2010 and confronted with exorbitant bail conditions, which he is in no capacity to pay,
J. ker se je Iran zavezal mednarodni skupnosti, da bo spoštoval mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah,
J. whereas Iran has pledged to the international community that it will abide by the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
2. ostro obsoja izredno hudo kazen, izrečeno proti Nasrin Sotude, in ustrahovanje njenega moža, ter ji izraža pohvalo za hrabrost in predanost;
Strongly condemns the extraordinarily harsh sentence against Nasrin Sotoudeh and the intimidation of her husband, and commends her for her courage and commitment;
8. poziva iranske oblasti, naj Rdečemu polmesecu dovolijo obisk vseh zapornikov, mednarodnim organizacijam za človekove pravice pa spremljanje razmer v državi;
Calls on the Iranian authorities to grant the Red Crescent access to all prisoners and to allow international human rights organisations to monitor the situation in the country;
12. poziva predstavnike EU ter podpredsednico Komisije in visoko predstavnico Unije za zunanje zadeve, naj začnejo z Islamsko republiko Iranom ponovno razpravljati o človekovih pravicah;
Calls on EU representatives and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to re-engage in talks about human rights with the Islamic Republic of Iran;
PE455.872v01-00 } PE455.874v01-00 } PE455.875v01-00 } PE455.881v01-00 } PE455.885v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o razmerah v Belorusiji
PE455.872v01-00 } PE455.874v01-00 } PE455.875v01-00 } PE455.881v01-00 } PE455.885v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the situation in Belarus
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razmerah v Belorusiji, zlasti resolucije z dne 17. decembra 2009
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus, in particular that of 17 December 2009 on Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta št. 2010/639/SZVP z dne 25. oktobra 2010 o omejevalnih ukrepih proti nekaterim uradnikom Belorusije, s katerim so bili omejevalni ukrepi podaljšani, nekateri ukrepi pa odloženi do 31. oktobra 2011,
– having regard to Council decision 2010/639/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against certain officials of Belarus, extending both the restrictive measures and suspension until 31 October 2011,
– ob upoštevanju izjave o predhodnih in sklepnih ugotovitvah o predsedniških volitvah v Belorusiji, ki sta jo podala urad OVSE za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice (OVSE/ODIHR) in parlamentarna skupščina OVSE 20. decembra 2010,
– having regard to the Statement of the preliminary findings and conclusions on the presidential election in Belarus by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (OSCE/ODIHR) and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA) as of 20 December 2010,
A. ker praška deklaracija, sprejeta na vrhu vzhodnega partnerstva, ponavlja zaveze do načel mednarodnega prava in temeljnih pravic, ki jih je sprejela tudi Belorusija, vključno z demokracijo, pravno državo in spoštovanjem človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
A. whereas the Prague Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit reaffirms the commitments, inter alia of Belarus, to the principles of international law and to fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms,
B. ker je Svet 25. oktobra 2010 pozval beloruske oblasti, naj zagotovijo, da bodo (predsedniške) volitve potekale skladno z mednarodnimi normami in standardi za demokratične volitve in z zavezami Belorusije v svetu OVSE in ZN,
B. whereas the Council, on 25 October 2010, ‘called on the Belarusian authorities to ensure that the (presidential) elections are conducted in line with international norms and standards for democratic elections and Belarus’s commitments in the OSCE and the UN’,
C. ker se je Belorusija zavezala, da bo upoštevala priporočila OVSE in urada OVSE za demokratične ustanove in človekove pravice (ODIHR) glede izboljšanja njene volilne zakonodaje, da bi bila usklajena z mednarodnimi standardi za demokratične volitve, ter da se bo glede predlaganih sprememb posvetovala z OVSE; ker je beloruski državni zbor sprejel reformo volilnega zakonika, ne da bi se poprej posvetoval z OVSE,
C. whereas Belarus has committed itself to consider the recommendations made by the OSCE and its Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) regarding improvements to its electoral law in order to bring it into line with international standards for democratic elections and to consult about the proposed amendments with the OSCE; whereas the National Assembly of Belarus passed a reform of the Electoral Code without prior consultation of the OSCE,
E. ker se je Svet po oceni razvoja dogodkov v Belorusiji odločil, da podaljša omejitvene ukrepe proti nekaterim beloruskim uradnikom, hkrati pa začasno opusti izvajanje omejevanja potovanj v EU, in sicer oboje do 31. oktobra 2011,
E. whereas the Council, after evaluating developments in Belarus, has decided to extend the restrictive measures against certain Belarusian officials but to suspend the application of the restrictions on travelling to the EU, both until 31 October 2011,
F. ker je glede na izjavo o predhodnih in sklepnih ugotovitvah o predsedniških volitvah v Belorusiji, ki sta jo podala urad OVSE za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice (OVSE/ODIHR) in parlamentarna skupščina OVSE, v predvolilnem času prišlo do nekaterih izboljšav, ki pa so jih kmalu zasenčile hude nepravilnosti na dan volitev in nasilje, ki je izbruhnilo v noči 19. decembra.
F. whereas according to the OSCE PA and OSCE/ODIHR ‘Statement of the preliminary findings and conclusions on the presidential election in Belarus’ some improvements took place in the run-up to the elections but they were overshadowed by the serious irregularities on the voting day and the violence that erupted on the night of 19 December,
G. ker je bilo zaradi sodelovanja na demonstracijah 19. decembra v Minsku pridržanih 700 oseb, od katerih je bila večina izpuščena po tem, ko je prestala kratko upravno kazen, 24 aktivistov in novinarjev, vključno s šestimi predsedniškimi kandidati, pa je bilo obtoženih organiziranja množičnih neredov, ki so jih spremljali siloviti napadi in oborožen odpor, zaradi česar bi bili lahko obsojeni tudi na 15 let zapora; ker bo morebiti kmalu obtoženih še 14 oseb,
G. whereas over 700 persons were detained for their participation in the demonstration on 19 December in Minsk, most of whom have been released after serving short administrative sentences while 24 opposition activists and journalists, including 6 presidential candidates, have been charged for ‘organising mass disorder’ accompanied by violent attacks and armed resistance that could carry prison sentences of up to 15 years; whereas a further 14 persons may soon be charged,
H. ker je policija zatrla demonstracije 19. decembra 2010, organi pregona pa so sprejeli dodatne ukrepe zoper demokratično opozicijo, svobodne medije in aktiviste civilne družbe, vse to pa so obsodili predsednik Evropskega parlamenta, visoka predstavnica Unije in generalni sekretar ZN,
H. whereas the police crackdown on the demonstration of 19 December 2010 and further measures taken by the law enforcement agencies against democratic opposition, free media and civil society activists were condemned by the President of the European Parliament, the EU High Representative and the UN General Secretary,
1. meni, da skladno s prvimi ugotovitvami generalne skupščine OVSE in urada za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice pri OVSE, volitve z 19. decembra 2010 niso izpolnile mednarodnih standardov, ki veljajo za svobodne, poštene in pregledne volitve; je prepričan, da pomenijo te volitve še eno neizkoriščeno priložnost za prehod Belorusije v demokracijo, ter glede na številne in hude nepravilnosti, o katerih poroča urad za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice pri OVSE, poziva k izvedbi novih volitev v svobodnih in demokratičnih razmerah, skladnih s standardi OVSE;
Considers, in line with the findings of the Preliminary Conclusions of the OSCE PA and OSCE/ODIHR, that the Presidential elections of 19 December 2010 failed to meet international standards of free, fair and transparent elections; considers this vote as yet another missed opportunity for a democratic transition in Belarus and calls, in the light of numerous and serious irregularities reported by OSCE/ODIHR, that new elections be held on the free and democratic conditions according to the OSCE standards;
5. zahteva takojšnjo in brezpogojno izpustitev vseh, ki so bili priprti na volilni dan in po njem, vključno z zaporniki iz vesti, ki jih priznava Amnesty International; poziva beloruske oblasti, naj priprtim omogočijo neoviran stik z družinskimi člani, pravno pomoč in zdravniško oskrbo;
Demands an immediate and unconditional release of all those detained during Election Day and in its aftermath including the prisoners of conscience recognised by Amnesty International; calls on the Belarusian authorities to provide unhindered access for the detainees to relatives, legal assistance and medical care;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje mehanizem za registracijo nevladnih organizacij, ki se v Belorusiji ne morejo registrirati iz političnih razlogov, da bodo lahko imele koristi od programov EU;
Calls on the European Commission to develop a mechanism of registration of NGOs that are denied registration in Belarus for political reasons, in order to enable them to benefit from the EU programmes;
12. poziva Svet, Komisijo in visoko predstavnico EU, naj nemudoma ponovno uvedejo prepoved izdaje vizumov in zamrznitev premoženja za vodilne predstavnike beloruskih oblasti in naj ta ukrepa razširijo na državne uradnike, člane sodstva in varnostne uradnike, ki bi utegnili biti odgovorni za ponarejanje glasov, brutalno nasilje po volitvah in aretacije članov opozicije; poudarja, da morajo ostati sankcije v veljavi vsaj do takrat, ko bodo izpuščeni in kazni oproščeni vsi politični zaporniki in pridržane osebe; pozdravlja dober zgled poljske vlade in litovskega parlamenta, ki sta uvedla omejitve za potovanja predstavnikov režima iz Minska, hkrati pa poenostavila dostop v EU za beloruske državljane;
Calls on the Council, the Commission and the EU High Representative to immediately re-apply the visa ban on the Belarusian leading authorities expanding it to the state officials, members of judiciary and security officers who can be considered responsible for the vote-rigging and post-election brutal repressions and arrests of the members of the opposition and to freeze their assets; points out the sanctions should remain in force minimum until all political prisoners and detainees are released and exempted from charges; welcomes the good example of the Polish Government and the Lithuanian Parliament, which imposed its own travel restrictions on the representatives of the Minsk regime and at the same time simplified access to the European Union for Belarusian citizens;
15. pričakuje, da države članice EU ne bodo oslabile ukrepov EU z dvostranskimi pobudami z beloruskim režimom, saj bi to spodkopalo verodostojnost in učinkovitost evropske zunanje politike;
Expects EU Member Countries not to weaken the EU action with bilateral initiatives with the Belarusian regime that undermine the credibility and effectiveness of the European foreign policy;
18. naroči predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, visoki predstavnici EU, državam članicam EU, predsedniku, vladi in parlamentu Belorusije ter parlamentarnim skupščinam Sveta Evrope in OVSE.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, EU HR, EU Member States, the President, Government and Parliament of Belarus and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the Council of Europe and the OSCE.
31.1.2011 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 115(5) poslovnika,
31.1.2011 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 115(5) of the Rules of Procedure
PE455.901v01-00 } PE455.911v01-00 } PE455.913v01-00 } PE455.914v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o krizi z odpadki v Kampaniji
PE455.901v01-00 } PE455.911v01-00 } PE455.913v01-00 } PE455.914v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the waste crisis in Campania
, zlasti njenega člena 4,
, in particular Article 4 thereof,
, zlasti njenega člena 2,
, in particular Article 2 thereof,
, zlasti njenega člena 11 in Priloge II,
, in particular Article 11 thereof and Annex II thereto,
, zlasti členov 17 in 18,
, in particular Articles 17 and 18 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. novembra 2003 o poročilu o nadaljnjem spremljanju o Direktivi Sveta 75/442/EGS (okvirna direktiva o odpadkih) Sprejeta besedila, P5_TA(2003)0508 .
– having regard to its resolution of 19 November 2003 on the follow-up report on Council Directive 75/442/EEC (Waste Framework Directive) Texts adopted, P5_TA(2003)0508 .
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Odbora za peticije o misiji za ugotavljanje dejstev v Kampaniji, Italija, od 28. do 30. aprila 2010 PETI_DT(2010)442870.
– having regard to the Working Document on the fact-finding mission by its Committee on Petitions to Campania, Italy, from 28 to 30 April 2010 PETI_DT(2010)442870.
– ob upoštevanju zakona Italijanske republike št. 123/2008, razglašenega 14. julija 2008,
– having regard to Law 123/2008 of the Italian Republic promulgated on 14 July 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropske unije v zadevi C-135/05 z dne 26. aprila 2007,
– having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-135/05 of 26 April 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropske unije v zadevi C-297/08 z dne 4. marca 2010,
– having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Case C-297/08 of 4 March 2010,
– ob upoštevanju členov 191 in 260 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to Articles 191 and 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
A. ker kriza z odpadki v pokrajini Kampanija predstavlja najbolj večplastno poglavje v zgodovini problematičnega ravnanja z odpadki v številnih delih Italije, tudi v Laziu, Kalabriji in na Siciliji, ker so bile v devetdesetih letih prejšnjega stoletja zaradi odpadkov razglašene izredne razmere in ker so bili imenovani vladni uradniki s posebnimi pooblastili in finančnimi sredstvi,
A. whereas the waste crisis in Campania is the most complex chapter in a history of problematic waste management in many parts of Italy, including Lazio, Calabria and Sicily, whereas a waste emergency was declared in the 1990s, and whereas government commissioners with special powers and funds were appointed,
B. ker je bilo z italijanskim zakonskim odlokom št. 195 z dne 31. decembra 2009 uradno razveljavljeno izredno stanje in ker je bila od takrat pristojnost za ravnanje z odpadki prenesena na pokrajinske organe,
B. whereas Italian Decree Law No 195 of 31 December 2009 officially declared the state of emergency ended and, as from that date onward, delegated responsibility for waste management to the provincial authorities,
C. ker je 5. oktobra 2010 Odbor za peticije Parlamenta zaradi številnih peticij glede problema ravnanja z odpadki v Kampaniji sprejel delovni dokument misije za ugotavljanje dejstev, ki se je od 28. do 30. aprila mudila v tej regiji,
C. whereas on 5 October 2010 a working document reporting on the fact-finding mission to Campania, Italy, from 28 to 30 April 2010, undertaken in response to the many petitions submitted concerning waste management problems in the region, was adopted by Parliament’s Committee on Petitions,
D. ker je po poletni krizi leta 2007 in kmalu po tem, ko je Odbor za peticije sprejel poročilo o misiji za ugotavljanje dejstev, izbruhnila nova kriza; ker so posledični razglasitvi izrednih ukrepov, kot je odprtje novih odlagališč, sledili množični protesti,
D. whereas a new crisis, following that of summer 2007, arose shortly after the adoption of the report on the fact-finding mission by the Committee on Petitions; whereas the announcement of the consequent exceptional measures, such as the opening of new landfills, was followed by massive protests,
E. ker začetna rešitev za proizvodnjo zavitih bal za odpadke in organskih odpadkov ni bila pravilno izpeljana in ker zaradi tega bal ni bilo mogoče odstraniti; ker je zaradi pomanjkanja filtriranja ali sortiranja odpadkov pri okrog sedmih milijonih ton bal kakovost slabša od dovoljene,
E. whereas the initial solution, involving the production of ‘Ecobales’ and organic waste, was not carried out correctly, so that the waste bales could not be disposed of; and whereas, owing to the lack of waste filtering or sorting procedures, an estimated amount of over seven million tonnes of ‘Ecobales’ of substandard quality were produced,
F. ker je prva sežigalnica v Acerri pričela delovati marca 2010, vendar je bila njena učinkovitost ovirana zaradi pomanjkanja ustrezne infrastrukture za ločevanje in obdelavo odpadkov, ter ker ostaja zaskrbljenost glede odlaganja strupenega pepela, ki se proizvaja med postopkom sežiganja;
F. whereas the first incinerator at Acerra only came on stream in March 2010, and whereas its operation has been hampered by the lack of appropriate infrastructure for the separation and treatment of waste and concerns remain regarding the disposal of the toxic ash produced by the incineration process,