natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
17. poziva Komisijo, države članice in vse zainteresirane strani, naj med seboj učinkoviteje sodelujejo pri pripravi skupnega standarda za registracijo, ki določa, katere poklice je treba regulirati in kako se ta sistem lažje uporabi s povezavo z omrežjem EURES;
Calls on the Commission, the Member States and all concerned stakeholders to cooperate more effectively in developing a common standard of registration which lays down which professions are to be regulated and how and to facilitate the use of this system by linking it with the EURES network;
22. meni, da je bistveno diplomante bolje usposobiti za odzivanje na zahteve trga dela, zato podpira zamisel o razširitvi prednosti te direktive na diplomante, ki bi želeli opraviti plačano vodeno prakso s svojega poklicnega področja v tujini;
Believes that it is crucial to better prepare graduates to respond to requirements of labour markets, therefore supports the idea of extending the benefits of the directive to graduates who wish to complete a period of remunerated supervised practical experience in the profession abroad;
26. poudarja, da se posamezni sistemi izobraževanja in usposabljanja v državah članicah še vedno močno razlikujejo; zato je treba ob najkrajšem trajanju šolanja za nekatere poklice upoštevati tudi obdobja praktičnega usposabljanja v dualnih sistemih poklicnega šolanja;
Points out that education and training systems still differ substantially from one Member State to another; takes the view, therefore, that periods usually spent at vocational schools as part of sandwich training should count towards the minimum periods of schooling required for certain professions;
29. poudarja, da bi moralo biti državam članicam še naprej dovoljeno uvajanje dopolnilnih ukrepov za izravnavo bistvenih vsebinskih razlik v usposabljanju, zlasti prilagoditvena obdobja;
Emphasises that the Member States should continue to be allowed to impose compensation measures, in particular adaptation courses, in order to offset significant disparities in the content of training;
33. poudarja, da je treba za oceno izvajanja Direktive 2005/36/ES oblikovati seznam spričeval ali drugih potrdil o formalnih kvalifikacijah, ki so v eni ali več državah članicah priznana, v drugih pa ne; meni, da bi moral ta seznam vsebovati tudi primere, ko državljani neke države članice študirajo v drugi državi članici, ob končanju študija pa se izkaže, da njihova matična država članica pridobljene diplome ne priznava.
Points out that the assessment of the implementation of Directive 2005/36/EC requires the drawing-up of a list of certificates or any other evidence of formal qualifications that are recognised in one or more Member States but are not recognised in other Member States; the list should also contain cases where citizens of a Member State who have studied at a university in another Member State find that their degrees are not recognised in their country of origin;
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Jean-Luc Bennahmias, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Raffaele Baldassarre, Jelko Kacin, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Emilie Turunen, Cecilia Wikström, Tatjana Ždanoka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Jelko Kacin, Ria Oomen-Ruijten, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Emilie Turunen, Cecilia Wikström, Tatjana Ždanoka
Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane poziva Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following amendments in its motion for a resolution:
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 22. junija 2011 z naslovom Posodobitev Direktive o poklicnih kvalifikacijah ( KOM(2011)0367 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 22 June 2011 entitled ‘Modernising the Professional Qualifications Directive’ ( COM(2011)0367 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Commission’s Communication of 3 March 2010 on ‘EUROPE 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 2005/36/ES z dne 7. septembra 2005 o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij,
– having regard to Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o prvi oceni direktive,
– having regard to the report on the first assessment of the directive,
– ob upoštevanju Poročila o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010 – Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU ( KOM(2010)0603 ),
– having regard to the EU Citizenship Report 2010 - Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights (COM(2010)603),
A. ker je pravica državljanov EU, da prebivajo, izvajajo storitve ali opravljajo poklic v drugi državi članici od tiste, ki je izdala poklicno kvalifikacijo, temeljna svoboščina notranjega trga,
A. whereas the right of EU citizens to establish themselves, to provide services or to pursue a profession in a Member State other than the one in which their professional qualification was issued is a fundamental freedom of the internal market;
B. ker je težko določiti pristojni organ za priznanje poklicnih kvalifikacij, saj so postopki zanj zapleteni,
B. whereas it is difficult to identify the authority responsible for the recognition of professional qualifications, the procedures relating to which are complex;
C. ker bi moral sedanji sistem samodejnega priznanja upoštevati tudi, ali ima strokovnjak dovoljenje za opravljanje poklica v matični državi članici ali mu je to prepovedano,
C. whereas there is a need for the current system of automatic recognition also to take into consideration whether the professional is allowed to practise or prevented from practising in the Member State of origin;
D. ker bo v Evropi po ocenah do leta 2020 primanjkovalo milijon strokovnjakov s področja zdravstvenega varstva, vključno z zdravniki, medicinskimi sestrami, zobozdravniki, farmacevti, fizioterapevti in drugim zdravstvenim osebjem, ter ker je treba za povečanje mobilnosti hitro in učinkovito priznavati kvalifikacije, tudi za delavce, ki se jim ta samodejno prizna,
D. whereas in Europe it is estimated that, by 2020, the shortage of health-care professionals, including doctors, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, physiotherapists and other paramedical staff will amount to one million and that, in order to increase mobility, the recognition of qualifications needs to be quick and efficient, also for workers whose qualifications are automatically recognised;
E. ker lahko prosto gibanje oseb znotraj EU in pravica do priznavanja zaslug ter poklicnega znanja in veščin obstajata le, če bi se omejile obstoječe nevidne ovire in če se bodo odpravili nekateri nacionalni predpisi, ki dandanes nesorazmerno ovirajo uveljavljanje pravice do kvalificiranih delovnih mest,
E. whereas the free movement of persons within the EU and the right to the recognition of merit and professional skills could only exist if the existing invisible barriers were limited, and whereas some national rules that nowadays disproportionately hinder the use of the right to qualified jobs will disappear;
F. ker direktiva o uveljavljanju pravic bolnikov na področju čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva zahteva, da države članice zdravljenja zagotovijo, da so organom drugih držav članic na voljo informacije o pravici strokovnjakov s področja zdravstvenega varstva, navedenih v nacionalnih ali lokalnih registrih, ki so vzpostavljeni na njihovem ozemlju, do opravljanja poklica, in da izmenjava teh informacij poteka prek informacijskega sistema za notranji trg,
F. whereas the Directive on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border health care requires that Member States of treatment ensure that information on the right to practise of health professionals listed in national or local registers established on their territory is made available to the authorities of other Member States, with an exchange of information taking place via the Internal Market Information system;
G. ker je eden od glavnih vzrokov za težave pri priznavanju akademskih nazivov ali poklicnih kvalifikacij pomanjkanje zaupanja v merila za akreditacijo in akademska spričevala države izvora, zaradi česar je nujno določiti ukrepe za samodejno priznavanje z odpravo predsodkov in formalnih nacionalnih ovir za priznavanje,
G. whereas one of the main reasons for the difficulties with recognising academic titles or professional qualifications is the lack of confidence in the criteria for the accreditation and the academic certificates of the country of origin, so that it is urgent to establish measures for automatic recognition by removing prejudices and formal national obstacles to recognition;
H. ker mora mobilnost strokovnjakov na področju zdravstva upoštevati tudi potrebo po skupni trajnostni zdravstveni delovni sili in vzdržnosti nacionalnih zdravstvenih sistemov,
H. whereas the mobility of professionals in the health sector should also take into account the need for an overall sustainable health workforce and the sustainability of national health-care systems;
3. poudarja številna vprašanja, ki se v javnih posvetovanjih pojavljajo v zvezi s poklicno izkaznico; zagovarja mnenje, da mora biti uvedba poklicne izkaznice prostovoljna za poklicnega strokovnjaka in pristojni organ;
Highlights numerous concerns raised in the public consultation about the professional card; argues that the introduction of any professional card must be voluntary for both the professional and the competent authority;
7. izraža željo, da bi bile države članice in pristojni organi pravočasno seznanjeni s tem, katere nove šolske kvalifikacije se samodejno priznajo;
Hopes that the Member States and competent authorities will be promptly notified of the new qualifications that are to benefit from automatic recognition;
12. želi, da bi vsaka država članica vzpostavila spletno točko dostopa s popolnimi in stalno posodobljenimi informacijami o imenih pristojnih organov in z dokumentacijo, ki je potrebna za priznanje kvalifikacij strokovnjakov s področja zdravstvenega varstva, da bi lahko ti strokovnjaki prek spleta hitro opravili postopke, ki so potrebni za priznanje njihovih poklicnih kvalifikacij;
Would like every Member State to establish an on‑line access point containing full and permanently‑updated information on the names of the competent authorities and on the documentation required for the recognition of health professionals’ qualifications, so that such professionals can swiftly complete the on‑line the procedures needed for their professional qualifications to be recognised;
18. poziva k dodatni pojasnitvi in smernicam za začasno ali priložnostno opravljanje storitev; priznava, da se pristojni organi spopadajo s težavami pri uporabi obstoječe ureditve;
Calls for further clarification and guidance on the provision of services on a temporary or occasional basis; acknowledges that competent authorities face difficulties in applying the existing regime;
22. meni, da začasno in/ali občasno opravljanje storitev pristojnim organom povzroča težave pri izvajanju sistema začasnega opravljanja storitev; zato poziva Komisijo, naj to vprašanje pojasni, s čimer bo preprečila, da bi sistem začasnega opravljanja storitev postal način za izogibanje zapletenim postopkom v okviru splošnega sistema;
Considers that the provision of temporary and/or occasional services creates problems for the competent authorities in terms of implementing the temporary regime; calls on the Commission, therefore, to clarify matters in order to prevent temporary establishment becoming a means of avoiding the complex procedures under the general system;
Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, grofica Róża Thun Und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Malcolm Harbour, Iliana Ivanova, Sandra Kalniete, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Gianni Pittella, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, María Irigoyen Pérez, Othmar Karas, Constance Le Grip, Emma McClarkin, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Olga Sehnalová, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Anja Weisgerber
Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, María Irigoyen Pérez, Othmar Karas, Constance Le Grip, Emma McClarkin, Antonyia Parvanova, Konstantinos Poupakis, Olga Sehnalová, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Anja Weisgerber
s priporočili Evropskega parlamenta Svetu, Komisiji in Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje glede pogajanj o pridružitvenem sporazumu med EU in Gruzijo
containing the European Parliament’s recommendations to the Council, the Commission and the EEAS on the negotiations of the EU-Georgia Association Agreement
Poročevalec: Krzysztof Lisek
Rapporteur: Krzysztof Lisek
– ob upoštevanju trenutnih pogajanj med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o sklenitvi pridružitvenega sporazuma,
– having regard to the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Georgia on the conclusion of an association agreement,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov izrednega srečanja Evropskega sveta z dne 1. septembra 2008 in sklepov Sveta Evropske unije za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose z dne 15. septembra 2008,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Extraordinary European Council of 1 September 2008, and the conclusions of the European Union External Relations Council of 15 September 2008,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o Gruziji z dne 10. maja 2010 o sprejetju pogajalskih smernic,
– having regard to the Council conclusions on Georgia of 10 May 2010 adopting the negotiating directives,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo, ki je začel veljati 1. julija 1999,
– having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between Georgia and the European Union, which entered into force on 1 July 1999,
– ob upoštevanja sporazuma o premirju z dne 12. avgusta 2008, ki sta ga ob posredovanju Evropske unije podpisali Gruzija in Ruska federacija, ter sporazuma o izvajanju z dne 8. septembra 2008,
– having regard to the ceasefire agreement of 12 August 2008, mediated by the EU and signed by Georgia and the Russian Federation, and the implementation agreement of 8 September 2008,
– ob upoštevanju govora predsednika Gruzije Mihaila Sakašvilija v Evropskem parlamentu 23. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the speech by Mikheil Saakashvili, the President of Georgia, to the European Parliament on 23 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave z vrhunskega srečanja o vzhodnem partnerstvu, ki je potekalo 7. maja 2009 v Pragi,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit of 7 May 2009,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega sporočila „Nov odziv na spremembe v sosedstvu“ z dne 25. maja 2011,
– having regard to the Joint Communication on ‘A new response to a changing Neighbourhood’ of 25 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega akcijskega načrta evropske sosedske politike EU–Gruzija, ki ga je 14. novembra 2006 sprejel Svet za sodelovanje EU–Gruzija in ki določa strateške ter posebne cilje, ki temeljijo na zavezah za skupne vrednote in učinkovitem izvajanju političnih, gospodarskih in institucionalnih reform,
– having regard to the joint EU-Georgia European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) Action Plan, endorsed by the EU-Georgia Cooperation Council on 14 November 2006, laying out the strategic and specific objectives based on commitments to shared values and effective implementation of political, economic and institutional reforms,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske komisije o napredku Gruzije, sprejetega 25. maja 2011,
– having regard to the European Commission Progress Report on Georgia adopted on 25 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sporazuma o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov in ponovnem sprejemu med EU in Gruzijo, ki je začel veljati 1. marca 2011,
– having regard to the EU-Georgia visa facilitation and readmission agreements that entered into force on 1 March 2011,
– ob upoštevanju skupne deklaracije o partnerstvu za mobilnost med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo z dne 30. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration on a Mobility Partnership between the EU and Georgia of 30 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju glavnih priporočil Evropske komisije iz leta 2009 o pripravah Gruzije na začetek pogajanj o poglobljenem in celovitem področju proste trgovine z Gruzijo,
– having regard to the European Commission’s key recommendations in relation to Georgia’s preparations for the opening of DCFTA negotiations with Georgia issued in 2009 ,
– ob upoštevanju podpisa Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o zaščiti geografskih označb za kmetijske proizvode in živila z dne 14. julija 2011,
– having regard to the signature of the Agreement between the EU and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs of 14 July 2011,
– ob upoštevanju podpisa Sporazuma z dne 2. decembra 2010 o skupnem zračnem prostoru med Evropsko unijo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Gruzijo na drugi strani,
– having regard to the signature of the Common Aviation Area Agreement between the EU and its Member States and Georgia of 2 December 2010,
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila št. 13/2010 Evropskega računskega sodišča o rezultatih Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva (ENPI) na Južnem Kavkazu,
– having regard to Special Report No 13/2010 by the European Court of Auditors concerning the results of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) in the Southern Caucasus,
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o Gruziji z dne 3. septembra 2008
– having regard to its resolutions on Georgia of 3 September 2008
26. , o nujnosti evropske strategije za južni Kavkaz z dne 20. maja 2010
26. , on the need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus of 20 May 2010
UL C 161E, 31.5.2011, str.
OJ C 161E, 31.5.2011, p.
136. ter o pregledu evropske sosedske politike – vzhodna dimenzija z dne 7. aprila 2011
136. and on the Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension of 7 April 2011
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0153 ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0153 ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0374/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0374/2011 ),
A. ker je vzhodno partnerstvo ustvarilo pomemben politični okvir za poglabljanje odnosov, pospeševanje političnega združevanja in nadaljnje gospodarsko povezovanje med EU in Gruzijo, tako da podpira politične in socialno-ekonomske reforme ter omogoča približevanje Uniji;
A. whereas the Eastern Partnership has created a meaningful political framework for deepening relations, accelerating political association and furthering economic integration between the EU and Georgia, by supporting political and socioeconomic reforms and facilitating rapprochement with the EU;
B. ker vzhodno partnerstvo omogoča krepitev dvostranskih odnosov z novimi pridružitvenimi sporazumi, pri čemer se upoštevajo specifične razmere in želje partnerske države ter njene zmožnosti izpolnjevanja obveznosti, izhajajočih iz partnerstva;
B. whereas the Eastern Partnership provides for the strengthening of bilateral relations by means of new association agreements, taking into account the specific situation and ambition of each partner country and its ability to comply with the resulting commitments;
C. ker sta dejavno sodelovanje Gruzije ter zavezanost skupnim vrednotam in načelom, vključno z demokracijo, pravno državo, dobrim upravljanjem in spoštovanjem človekovih pravic, bistveni za napredovanje procesa, pa tudi za uspešna pogajanja o pridružitvenem sporazumu ter njegovo poznejše izvajanje, kar bi zagotovilo trajen vpliv sporazuma na razvoj države,
C. whereas the active engagement of Georgia and a commitment to shared values and principles, including democracy, the rule of law, good governance and respect for human rights, are essential to take the process forward and to make the negotiation and subsequent implementation of the association agreement a success and ensure that it has a sustainable impact on the development of the country;
D. ker je približevanje zakonodaje pomembno sredstvo za spodbujanje sodelovanja med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo;
D. whereas legal approximation is an important tool for fostering cooperation between the EU and Georgia;
E. ker je Gruzija med najbolj uspešnimi partnericami vzhodnega partnerstva pri sprejemanju reform, čeprav se pri izvajanju še vedno sooča s težavami; ker so potrebne dodatne izboljšave na področju reform pravosodnega sistema, pravic delavcev in žensk ter integracije manjšin;
E. whereas Georgia is one of the best-performing partners of the Eastern Partnership in adopting reforms, although problems still persist as regards their implementation; whereas further improvement is needed regarding reforms in the justice system, and labour rights, women’s rights and integration of minorities;
F. ker nerešeni konflikt med Rusijo in Gruzijo ovira stabilnost in razvoj Gruzije; ker Rusija še vedno zaseda gruzijski regiji Abhazijo in Chinvalsko regijo/Južno Osetijo ter s tem krši temeljne norme in načela mednarodnega prava; ker na območjih pod dejanskim nadzorom okupacijskih sil poteka etično čiščenje in nasilne demografske spremembe, te sile pa so odgovorne tudi za kršitve človekovih pravic na teh območjih;
F. whereas the unresolved Russia-Georgia conflict hampers the stability and development of Georgia; whereas Russia continues to occupy the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region / South Ossetia, in violation of the fundamental norms and principles of international law; whereas ethnic cleansing and forcible demographic changes have taken place in the areas under the effective control of the occupying force, which bears the responsibility for human rights violations in these areas;