natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
S. ker so nekatere pomembne trgovinske partnerice, ki trenutno niso pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA, v svetu TRIPS izjavile, da bi bil sporazum ACTA lahko v navzkrižju s sporazumom TRIPS in drugimi sporazumi STO ter bi lahko ogrozil zakonodajo in proces v STO, saj bi deloval zunaj njenega pravnega okvira, spodkopal bi ravnovesje pravic, dolžnosti in prožnosti, ki so bile dosežene s pogajanji za različne sporazume STO, izkrivljal bi trgovino ali ustvaril trgovinske ovire ter spodkopal prožnosti, vključene v sporazum TRIPS, ter deklaracijo iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju iz leta 2001 za področja, kot je javno zdravje in trgovina generičnih zdravil,
S. whereas some significant trading partners which are not currently parties to ACTA have asserted at the WTO TRIPS Council that ACTA may conflict with the TRIPS Agreement and other WTO agreements, pose a risk to WTO law and process by operating outside the WTO legal framework, undermine the balance of rights, obligations and flexibilities that were carefully negotiated in various WTO agreements, distort trade or create trade barriers, and undermine flexibilities built into TRIPS and the 2001 Doha declaration on TRIPS and public health, such as for public health and trade in generic medicines,
T. ker je Komisija v sporočilu z dne 19. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da mora Unija na področju temeljnih pravic delovati brezhibno in da mora biti v zvezi s tem za zgled; ker je Komisija na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da sporazum ACTA še ni parafiran in da ima Komisija kot pogajalec pristojnost, da določi, na kateri stopnji so pogajanja tehnično zaključena in se sporazum lahko parafira,
T. whereas in its Communication of 19 October 2010 the Commission stated that the 'Union’s action must be above reproach when it comes to fundamental rights' and that the 'Union must be exemplary in this respect'; whereas the Commission stated in plenary on 20 October 2010 that ACTA 'is not yet initialled' and that 'it is the Commission’s prerogative, as a negotiator, to determine the point at which negotiations are technically finalised and at which the agreement can be initialled',
U. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih Uniji nalagajo predpisi o varstvu zasebnosti in podatkov, kakor je to določeno z Direktivo 95/46/ES, Direktivo 2002/58/ES (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009), Direktivo 2009/136/ES in Direktivo 2009/140/ES o elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah ter s sodno prakso Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
U. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection law, as set out in particular in Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC (as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009), Directive 2009/136/EC and Directive 2009/140/EC on electronic communications networks and services, and in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
V. ker Komisijo obvezuje medinstitucionalni sporazum iz leta 2010 in zato ne sme podpirati samoregulativnih ali koregulativnih mehanizmov, ko gre za temeljne pravice, kot je pravica do svobodnega izražanja,
V. whereas the Commission is bound by the 2010 Interinstitutional Agreement and therefore cannot support self- and co-regulatory mechanisms where fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of expression, are at stake,
W. ker je Komisija 19. oktobra 2010 objavila sporočilo o oceni učinka,
W. whereas the Commission published a communication on impact assessment on 19 October 2010,
X. ker se nobenih določb v sporazumu ACTA ne sme razlagati tako, da bi ustvarile precedens ali bi omogočile sedanja ali prihodnja odstopanja od pravnega reda oziroma njegove spremembe, ki bi privedle do slabšega varstva temeljnih pravic po zakonodaji Unije; ker bi morala Komisija in Svet s tem načelom izrecno soglašati,
X. whereas no provision in the ACTA Agreement may be interpreted in such a way as to create a precedent or to allow for current or future derogation from, or the amendment of, the acquis that could lead to the weakening of the protection of fundamental rights under EU law, and whereas the Commission and Council should explicitly state their agreement with this principle,
Y. ker je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da je treba izvajati varstvo geografskih označb; ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA dogovorile, da bodo poskrbele za izvrševanje določb o geografskih označbah,
Y. whereas the Commission has repeatedly affirmed the importance of enforcing the protection of geographical indications (GIs); whereas it has been agreed by the parties that ACTA will provide for the enforcement of GIs,
Z. ker je trgovinski obseg opredeljen v členu 2.14.1 sporazuma ACTA: „za namene tega poglavja zajemajo dejanja, izvedena v trgovinskem obsegu, vsaj tista dejanja, ki so bila izvedena kot trgovinske dejavnosti za neposredno ekonomsko ali komercialno korist“,
Z. whereas Article 2.14.1 of ACTA contains a definition of commercial scale: 'For the purpose of this section, acts carried out on a commercial scale include at least those carried out as commercial activities for direct economic or commercial advantage',
AA. ker je v opombi 9 sporazuma ACTA navedeno: „Vsaka pogodbenica mora nameren uvoz ali izvoz blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk ali piratskega blaga v trgovinskem obsegu obravnavati kot nezakonito dejavnost, za katero so zagrožene kazenske sankcije iz tega člena.
AA. whereas ACTA footnote 9 states: 'Each Party shall treat wilful importation or exportation of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a commercial scale as unlawful activities subject to criminal penalties under this Article.
Pogodbenica lahko svoje dolžnosti v zvezi z izvozom in uvozom piratskega blaga ali blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk izpolni tako, da distribucijo, prodajo ali ponudbo za prodajo blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk ali piratskega blaga v trgovinskem obsegu opredeli kot nezakonite dejavnosti, za katere so zagrožene kazenske sankcije“,
A Party may comply with its obligation relating to exportation and importation of pirated copyright or counterfeit trademark goods by providing for distribution, sale or offer for sale of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a commercial scale as unlawful activities subject to criminal penalties',
BB. ker poglavje sporazuma ACTA o kazenskopravnem pregonu navaja določbe o kazenskih postopkih, kazenski odgovornosti, kaznivih dejanjih, kazenskopravnem pregonu in kaznih; ker se je o določbah v zvezi s kazenskopravnim pregonom v sporazumu ACTA pogajalo predsedstvo Sveta v imenu držav članic,
BB. whereas the Criminal Enforcement section of ACTA contains provisions on criminal procedures, criminal liability, criminal offences, criminal enforcement and penalties; whereas the Council Presidency has negotiated the criminal enforcement provisions in ACTA on behalf of the Member States,
CC. meni, da ponudniki internetnih storitev ne bi smeli nositi odgovornosti za podatke, ki jih prenašajo ali gostijo s svojimi storitvami v taki meri, da bi morali podatke pred prenosom nadzirati ali filtrirati; ker evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov v svojem mnenju o sporazumu ACTA opozarja, da utegnejo ponudniki internetnih storitev v pogodbe s svojimi strankami vključiti klavzule o spremljanju njihovih podatkov in ukinitvi njihovih naročnin,
CC. whereas internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would necessitate prior surveillance or filtering of such data; whereas the EDPS's opinion on ACTA warns that internet service providers (ISPs) might insert 'clauses in their customer's contracts allowing the monitoring of their data and the cutting of their subscriptions',
DD. ker člen 1.2 sporazuma določa, da vsaka pogodbenica svobodno določi ustrezno metodo za izvajanje določb tega sporazuma v skladu s svojim pravnim sistemom in prakso;
DD. whereas Article 1.2 of the agreement states that '[E]ach Party shall be free to determine the appropriate method of implementing the provisions of this Agreement within its own legal system and practice',
EE. ker kršitve intelektualne lastnine v digitalnem okolju obravnavajo nacionalni sodni organi,
EE. whereas the infringement of IPRs in the digital environment is dealt with by the national judicial authorities,
FF. ker je odbor ACTA z institucionalno ureditvijo iz sporazuma ACTA med drugim pristojen za izvajanje, delovanje in spreminjanje sporazuma, za nevladno sodelovanje in odločitve v zvezi s svojim poslovnikom; ker Unijo v skladu s členom 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji vodi tudi spodbujanje demokracije,
FF. whereas the institutional arrangements in ACTA confer on the ACTA Committee authority concerning, inter alia , the implementation and operation of the agreement, the amendment of the agreement, non-governmental participation and decisions regarding the Committee's rules and procedures; whereas Article 21 TEU guides the Union to seek the advancement of democracy,
1. ugotavlja, da so se v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo pristojnosti Parlamenta na področju skupne trgovinske politike precej povečale, zlasti da mora Parlament odobriti vse trgovinske sporazume, ki jih sklene Evropska unija;
Notes that, in accordance with the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament's powers have been greatly extended in the area of the common commercial policy, and, in particular, that Parliament is required to give its consent to all trade agreements concluded by the EU;
4. je seznanjen z sklenitvijo 11. kroga pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA; ugotavlja, da je bilo po pogajalskem krogu iz Tokia 2. oktobra 2010 objavljeno prečiščeno, 15. novembra 2010 pa končno besedilo;
Notes the conclusion of the 11th round of negotiations on ACTA; notes the release of the consolidated text on 2 October 2010, following the Tokyo round, and the release of the final text on 15 November 2010;
8. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pojasnita pravno podlago; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni razdelitev pristojnosti med Svetom in Komisijo pri poglavju o kazenskopravnem pregonu v sporazumu ACTA, tudi v zvezi z njegovim parafiranjem; vztraja pri tem, da se Parlamentu pred parafiranjem sporazuma predloži dokaze, da je pravna podlaga za pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA v celoti skladna z Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Calls on the Commission and Council to clarify the legal basis; asks the Commission to clarify the division of competences between it and the Council regarding the Criminal Enforcement section of ACTA, including in relation to its initialling; insists that Parliament be presented with evidence that the legal basis for negotiating ACTA is fully consistent with the Lisbon Treaty prior to the initialling of the agreement;
12 poziva Komisijo, naj pred začetkom postopka odobritve v Parlamentu pravočasno izrecno potrdi, da določbe sporazuma ACTA ne posegajo v ustrezne določbe pravnega reda Skupnosti, kot so določbe v direktivi o programski opremi 91/250/EGS in direktivi o informacijski družbi 2001/29/ES, in v ukrepe držav članic za izvajanje teh direktiv, ki v nekaterih primerih dovoljujejo obratno inženirstvo računalniških programov in izogibanje varovalnim tehničnim ukrepom, da bi zagotovili medobratovalnost in tako spodbujali konkurenco in inovacije;
12 Asks the Commission explicitly to confirm, in good time before the Parliament consent procedure commences, that ACTA's provisions leave unaffected the relevant provisions in the acquis communautaire , such as those contained in the Software Directive (91/250/EEC) and the Information Society Directive (2001/29/EC) and the Member State measures implementing those directives, which in some cases permit reverse engineering of computer programs and circumvention of TPMs in order to enable interoperability, thereby promoting competition and innovation;
14. trdi, da bi izrazito povišanje odškodnin in drugih pravnih sredstev za morebitne kršitve intelektualne lastnine utegnilo odvrniti proizvajalce in tretje osebe, ki sodelujejo pri proizvodnji, prodaji ali distribuciji cenovno sprejemljivih generičnih zdravil, zlasti če bo veljalo za blago v tranzitu; je zaskrbljen, da lahko uporaba določb o civilnopravnem uveljavljanju iz sporazuma ACTA pri patentih nasprotuje javnemu interesu, poveča naložbena tveganja in tržno negotovost ter ogrozi tehnološke inovacije, zlasti v sektorjih, kjer je težko odkriti kršitve, ali pri uveljavljanju patentov za žive organizme, domače proizvode in tradicionalna zdravila; poziva Komisijo, naj pred parafiranjem sporazuma obravnava širok spekter pomislekov, navedenih v tej resoluciji, o možnosti uporabe civilnopravnih določb za patente in nato o tem poroča Parlamentu;
Asserts that marked increases in damages and in other remedies for possible IPR violations could deter manufacturers and third parties involved in the production, sale or distribution of affordable generic medicines, particularly if these provisions are applied to in-transit goods; is concerned that applying civil enforcement provisions to patents in ACTA could go against the public interest, and may increase investment risk, market uncertainty and threaten technological innovation, particularly in sectors where infringement is difficult to determine, or in enforcing patents on living organisms, indigenous products and traditional medicines; asks the Commission to address, prior to the initialling of the agreement, the far-ranging concerns listed in this resolution with regard to the option of applying civil-law provisions to patents and subsequently present a report to Parliament;
19. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj pravočasno pred parafiranjem sporazuma oceni učinek izvajanja sporazuma ACTA na temeljne pravice in varstvo podatkov, na tekoča prizadevanja EU za uskladitev ukrepov uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine in na direktivo o elektronskem poslovanju;
Calls once again on the Commission to conduct, in good time prior to the initialling of the agreement, an assessment of the impact of ACTA's implementation on fundamental rights and data protection, on the EU's ongoing efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures and on the E-Commerce Directive;
22. vztraja pri tem, da mora Komisija hitro ukrepati v skladu s svojim sporočilom z dne 19. oktobra 2010 o oceni učinka na temeljne pravice;
Insists that the Commission takes speedy action in accordance with its communication of 19 October 2010 on an impact assessment as regards fundamental rights;
24. se ne strinja s stališčem Komisije, ki trdi, da je na področju zaščite geografskih označb zagotovila precejšen napredek; meni, da napredek na tem področju ni zadovoljiv, saj bodo geografske označbe v vseh državah, ki jih ne priznavajo v nacionalni zakonodaji, ostale nezaščitene;
Disagrees with the position of the Commission, which claims to have secured significant improvements regarding the protection of GIs; considers that, since GIs will remain unprotected in all countries which do not recognise them in their national legislation, progress in this field is unsatisfactory;
27. meni, da se od podpisnic ne bi smelo zahtevati, da morajo kriminalizirati snemanje s kamero, zato pozdravlja dejstvo, da so se na zahtevo EU dogovorile, da je kriminalizacija snemanja s kamero neobvezna (člena 2.14.3 in 2.15);
Considers that the parties should not be obliged to criminalise 'camcording' and therefore welcomes the fact that the parties agreed, at the EU's insistence, that the criminalisation of 'camcording' should be merely optional (Articles 2.14.3 and 2.15);
30. obžaluje dejstvo, da člen 2.18.3 pogodbenicam izrecno naroča (tj. „prizadevati si“), naj v sodelovanju s poslovno skupnostjo učinkovito preprečujejo kršitve; opozarja Komisijo, da se je v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu leta 2003 zavezala, da bo „zagotovila, da bo vsakršna uporaba sourejanja ali samourejanja vselej v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti (...) in da ne bo v uporabi, kadar so pod vprašajem temeljne pravice“; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, ali lahko sporazum ACTA v splošnem spremeni sedanje ravnotežje v pravu EU med pravnimi obveznostmi ponudnikov internetnih storitev o varovanju osebnih podatkov končnih uporabnikov in razkrivanju teh podatkov imetnikom pravic intelektualne lastnine ali upravnim in sodnim organom;
Deplores the fact that Article 2.18.3 explicitly instructs parties (i.e. 'shall endeavour') to cooperate with the business community to 'effectively address' infringements; reminds the Commission that in the 2003 Interinstitutional Agreement it agreed to 'ensure that any use of co-regulation or self-regulation is always consistent with Community law (...) and will not be applicable where fundamental rights are at stake'; asks the Commission to assess whether, in overall terms, ACTA may change the current balance in EU law between the legal obligations of internet service providers to protect the personal data of end users and to disclose such data to intellectual property rights holders or administrative and judicial authorities;
32. je zaskrbljen, da bi zelo široka opredelitev dejavnosti trgovinskega obsega (člen 2.14.1) – skupaj z obveznostjo izboljšanja sankcij kazenskopravnega pregona v primeru kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine v digitalnem okolju (člen 2.18.1), vključno s pomočjo in podporo (člen 2.14.4) – lahko spodbudila podpisnice sporazuma k sprejetju zakonodaje, ki bo v praksi pripeljala h kriminalizaciji zasebnih uporabnikov in posrednikov;
Is concerned that a very broad definition of acts of 'commercial scale' (Article 2.14.1), coupled with an obligation to improve criminal enforcement sanctions in the event of IPR infringement in the digital environment (Article 2.18.1), including for 'aiding and abetting' (Article 2.14.4), may encourage parties to the agreement to adopt legislation which will in practice lead to the criminalisation of private users and intermediaries;
Pogoji EP za podelitev odobritve
EP's c onditions for granting consent
o 10. obletnici resolucije Varnostnega sveta OZN št. 1325 (2000) o ženskah, miru in varnosti
on the 10th anniversary of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security
PE450.459v01-00 } PE450.461v01-00 } PE450.462v01-00 } PE450.463v01-00 } PE450.485v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o 10. obletnici resolucije Varnostnega sveta OZN št. 1325 (2000) o ženskah, miru in varnosti
PE450.459v01-00 } PE450.461v01-00 } PE450.462v01-00 } PE450.463v01-00 } PE450.485v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the 10th anniversary of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security
– ob upoštevanju resolucij Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 1325 (2000) in št. 1820 (2008) o ženskah, miru in varnosti ter njegove resolucije št. 1888 (2009) o spolnem nasilju nad ženskami in otroki v oboroženih spopadih, v katerih je poudarjena odgovornost vseh držav, da končajo prakso nekaznovanja in kazensko preganjajo povzročitelje zločinov proti človeštvu in vojnih zločinov, vključno s tistimi, ki so povezani s spolnim ali drugim nasiljem nad ženskami in dekleti,
– having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security and UN Security Council Resolution 1888 (2009) on sexual violence against women and children in situations of armed conflict, which emphasises the responsibility of all states to put an end to impunity and to prosecute those responsible for crimes against humanity and war crimes, including those relating to sexual and other violence against women and girls,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov št. 54/143 z dne 7. februarja 2000, s katero je bil 25. november določen kot mednarodni dan proti nasilju nad ženskami,
– having regard to UN General Assembly resolution 54/134 of 7 February 2000, which established 25 November as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta Sveta EU za enakost med spoloma v razvojnem sodelovanju, ki bi moral zagotoviti, da bo enakost med spoloma na vseh ravneh vključena v vse sodelovanje EU s partnerskimi državami,
– having regard to the EU Council Plan of Action on Gender Equality in Development Cooperation, which should ensure that gender equality is mainstreamed throughout the EU's work with partner countries at all levels,
– ob upoštevanju imenovanja posebnega predstavnika generalnega sekretarja OZN za spolno nasilje v oboroženih spopadih marca 2010,
– having regard to the appointment in March 2010 of a Special Representative to the UN Secretary General on Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict,
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta "Celovit pristop k izvajanju resolucij Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1325 in 1820" in delovnega dokumenta "Izvajanje RVSZN 1325, podkrepljene z RVSZN 1820, v okviru EVOP", ki sta bila sprejeta decembra 2008, ter dokumenta Sveta "Vključevanje človekovih pravic v EVOP", sprejetega septembra 2006,
– having regard to the Council paper ‘Comprehensive Approach to the EU Implementation of UNSCR 1325 and 1820’ and the operational document on ‘the Implementation of UNSCR 1325 as reinforced by UNSCR 1820 in the context of ESDP’, both adopted in December 2008, and to the Council document on ‘Mainstreaming of Human Rights into ESDP’ of September 2006,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. aprila 2009 o vključevanju načela enakosti med spoloma v zunanje odnose EU ter v vzpostavljanje miru in oblikovanje državnih struktur Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0372 .
– having regard to its resolution of 3 April 2009 on gender mainstreaming in EU external relations and peace-building/nation-building Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0372 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o položaju žensk v oboroženih spopadih in njihovi vlogi pri obnovi po koncu konfliktov Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0245 .
– having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on women in armed conflicts and their role in post-conflict reconstruction Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0245 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. oktobra 2006 o ženskah v politiki Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0497 .
– having regard to its resolution of 17 October 2006 on women in politics Texts adopted, P6_TA(2006)0497 .
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta za vključevanje načela enakosti med spoloma, ki ga je leta 2007 pripravil Pododbor za varnost in obrambo,
– having regard to the 2007 gender-mainstreaming action plan of its Subcommittee on Security and Defence,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. oktobra 2010 o neuspešnem varstvu človekovih pravic in zakonitosti v Demokratični republiki Kongo Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2010)0350 .
– having regard to its resolution of 7 October 2010 on failures in protection of human rights and justice in the Democratic Republic of Congo Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0350 .
A. ker je nasilje nad ženskami na območjih, kjer potekajo spopadi, pogosto stopnjevanje diskriminacije na podlagi spola, ki že obstaja v času miru; ker letos mednarodni dan proti nasilju nad ženskami sovpada z deseto obletnico resolucije Varnostnega sveta OZN št. 1325, ki je prva resolucija, ki obravnava nesorazmeren in poseben vpliv oboroženih spopadov na ženske in ki povezuje izkušnje žensk v zvezi s spopadi z ohranjanjem mednarodnega miru in varnosti, kar vključuje vzajemno povezana tematska področja sodelovanja, zaščite, preprečevanja, pomoči in okrevanja,
A. whereas violence against women in conflict zones is often an extension of the gender discrimination that already exists in peacetime; whereas this year the International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women coincides with the 10th anniversary of UN Security Council Resolution 1325, which was the first resolution to address the disproportionate and unique impact of armed conflict on women and to link women's experiences of conflict to the maintenance of international peace and security, covering the inter-linked thematic areas of participation, protection, prevention, relief and recovery,
B. ker je 25. november mednarodni dan proti nasilju nad ženskami,
B. having regard to the International Day against Violence against Women on 25 November,