natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
prosi Svet, naj upošteva možnost financiranja skupnih stroškov takšnih operacij iz proračuna Skupnosti v primeru katere koli prihodnje operacije EVOP za boj proti terorizmu, v nasprotju z obstoječimi pravili, npr.načela da "stroške povrne vsaka država članica posebej" ali katerim koli drugim začasnim programom, npr. tako imenovanim "mehanizmom ATENA";
Asks the Council to consider, in the event of any future ESDP operation in the fight against terrorism, and in opposition to existing rules such as the principle that "costs lie where they fall" or any other ad hoc arrangements such as the so-called "ATHENA mechanism", the possibility of funding the joint cost of such operations from the Community budget;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje to resolucijo Svetu, Komisiji, parlamentom držav članic, generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov, generalnemu sekretarju Nata in generalnemu sekretarju Sveta Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the parliaments of the Member States, the Secretary-General of the UN, the Secretary General of NATO and the Secretary General of the Council of Europe.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju Evropske varnostne strategije (2004/2167(INI))
European Parliament resolution on the European Security Strategy ( 2004/2167(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o sprejetju Ustave za Evropo, podpisane v Rimu 29. oktobra 2004,
having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed in Rome on 29 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju Evropske varnostne strategije, ki jo je sprejel Evropski svet 12. decembra 2003, ki v zvezi s tem sledi pobudi grškega predsedstva, neuradnemu svetu zunanjih ministrov (Kastellorizon, maj 2003) ter zaključkom Evropskega sveta iz Soluna (19. in 20. junij 2003),
having regard to the European Security Strategy adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003 , following an initiative in this connection by the Greek Presidency, the informal Council of Foreign Ministers (Kastellorizon, May 2003) and the conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council (19-20 June 2003),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 30. novembra 2000 o ustanovitvi skupne evropske varnostne in obrambne politike po Kölnu in Helsinkih UL C 228, 13.8.2001, str.
having regard to its resolution of 30 November 2000 on the establishment of a common European security and defence policy after Cologne and Helsinki OJ C 228, 13.8.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2003 o novi evropski varnostni in obrambni arhitekturi − prednosti in pomanjkljivosti UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2003 on the new European security and defence architecture - priorities and deficiencies OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2005 o konferenci o pregledu Pogodbe o neširjenju jedrskega orožja v Severni Koreji in v Iranu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0075.
having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2005 on the Non-Proliferation Treaty 2005 Review Conference - Nuclear arms in North Korea and Iran Texts adopted, P6_TA(2005)0075 .
ob upoštevanju predloga za Belo knjigo o evropski obrambi, ki ga je predložil Inštitut Evropske Unije za varnostne študije v maju 2004,
having regard to the Proposal for a White Paper on European defence as presented by the EU Institute for Security Studies in May 2004,
ob upoštevanju poročila o doktrini o varnosti ljudi za Evropo, ki ga je predstavil visoki predstavnik EU 15. septembra 2004 Barcelonsko poročilo študijske skupine o Evropskih varnostnih zmogljivostih.
having regard to the report on a Human Security Doctrine for Europe as presented to the EU High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy on 15 September 2004 The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe's Security Capabilities.
ob upoštevanju različnih programov o preprečevanju sporov, kot so jih javno objavile vse evropske institucije,
having regard to the various programmes on conflict prevention as made public by all the European Institutions,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0072/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0072/2005 ),
upošteva nadaljnji načrt razvoja EVOP, kot je bil izražen med srečanji na vrhu Evropskega sveta v Kölnu (3. in 4. junij 1999), Helsinkih (10. in 11. december 1999) in Göteborgu (15. in 16. junij 2001),
considering the subsequent ESDP development agenda as expressed during the European Council Summits in Cologne (3-4 June 1999), Helsinki (10-11 December 1999) and Göteborg (15-16 June 2001),
ob upoštevanju potrebe po okrepitvi nadzora izvoza orožja v EU in iz nje ter na svetovni ravni,
considering the need to strengthen arms exports control in and from the EU and at global level,
priznava pomembno vlogo, ki jo imajo različni programi pomoči EU in njihove nepogrešljive prispevke za gospodarski razvoj, podporo rasti demokratičnih ustanov, izvajanje ukrepov za obnovo, oblikovanje makroekonomskih programov in spodbujanje človekovih pravic,
recognising the important role played by various EU assistance programmes and the indispensable contribution they make to economic development, to supporting the growth of democratic institutions, to the implementation of reconstruction measures, to drawing up macro-economic programmes and to promoting human rights,
priznava, da se celostni pristop, ki ga zagovarja Evropska varnostna strategija, že dejavno izvaja na Balkanu, kar potrjuje tudi obseg instrumentov EU, ki se zdaj uporabljajo za doseganje stabilnosti v regiji: program pomoči CARDS; civilni misiji PROXIMA in EUPM; in vojaška misija ALTHEA,
acknowledging that the comprehensive approach advocated in the European Security Strategy is already being actively pursued in the Balkans, as demonstrated by the scale of EU instruments currently being applied to bring stability to the region: the CARDS assistance programme; the civilian missions PROXIMA and EUPM; and the military mission ALTHEA,
prepoznava stalno raven podpore, ugotovljeno v desetletnem obdobju javnomnenjskih raziskav, ki kažejo, da več kot 60 % državljanov EU podpira skupno zunanjo politiko EU, več kot 70 % pa jih podpira skupno obrambno politiko, vendar ob upoštevanju drugih raziskav, po katerih za povečanje izdatkov za vojsko ni podpore,
recognising the consistent support levels established over a ten-year period of public opinion surveys, which have shown that more than 60% of EU citizens are in favour of a common EU foreign policy and more than 70% in favour of a common defence policy; noting, however, other opinion surveys which do not show support for increased military spending,
opaža in obžaluje, da se raven, po kateri je skupna zunanja in varnostna politika (SZVP) odgovorna Evropskemu parlamentu v skladu s členom III-304 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, ni občutno povečala ter da se Svet pri številnih odločitvah in dejanjih nikoli ne posvetuje in ni posvetoval s Parlamentom; kljub temu priznava dobro voljo visokega predstavnika in njegovih služb pri obveščanju Parlamenta in pri dialogu s Parlamentom; poziva visokega predstavnika in njegove službe k nadaljevanju in okrepitvi tega odkritega dialoga s Parlamentom,
noting and regretting that the level to which the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is subject to scrutiny by the European Parliament in accordance with Article III-304 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe has not significantly been increased and that Parliament is not and has never been consulted on numerous Council decisions and actions; recognising nevertheless the goodwill demonstrated by the High Representative and his services in keeping Parliament informed and engaging in dialogue with Parliament; urging the High Representative and his services to continue to strengthen this transparent dialogue with Parliament,
opaža, brez poseganja v prejšnjo točko, da so za dejavnosti v okviru SZVP Unije še naprej odgovorni nacionalni parlamenti, še posebej v zvezi z državami članicami, kjer je za vojaške dejavnosti potrebna odobritev parlamenta,
observing, without prejudice to the previous point, the continued accountability of actions undertaken within the Union's CFSP framework to the national parliaments, particularly with regard to those Member States where parliamentary approval is required in order to undertake any military action,
priznava, da je treba vse dejavnosti in ukrepe v okviru SZVP Unije izvajati strogo v skladu z mednarodnim pravom in načeli Ustanovne listine OZN, kot jasno navajata člena I-3 in III-292 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo,
acknowledging that all actions and measures undertaken within the framework of the Union's CFSP are to be exercised in strict adherence to international law and with respect for the principles of the UN Charter, as stated clearly in Articles I-3 and III-292 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
ker je veliko držav članic EU (vključno z Združenim kraljestvom, Nemčijo, Španijo, Italijo in Grčijo) imelo, in v nekaterih primerih še vedno ima, lastne izkušnje z različnimi oblikami terorizma in filozofijami, na katerih temeljijo,
whereas many EU Member States (including the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Italy and Greece) have had, and in some cases are still having, their own experiences with various forms of terrorism and the philosophies which underlie them,
ker je, v bližnji prihodnosti, islamski terorizem največji izziv za EU in za druge regije, zlasti če se teroristom uspe polastiti orožja za množično uničevanje,
whereas, for the foreseeable future, Islamist terrorism represents the greatest challenge to the EU, as to other regions, particularly in the event that terrorists succeed in gaining control of weapons of mass destruction,
ker je Evropska varnostna strategija del obsežne SZVP in EVOP, v katerih je EU na voljo cel spekter političnih dejavnosti, vključno z dejavnostmi diplomatske, gospodarske ali razvojne narave,
whereas the European Security Strategy forms part of the comprehensive CFSP and ESDP, in which the whole spectrum of political activities available to the EU, including those of a diplomatic, economic or development nature, may come into play,
Evropsko varnostno okolje
The European security environment
poudarja, da je mogoče le z vsestranskim razumevanjem opredelitve "varnosti" upoštevati vpliv vprašanj politične in demokratične narave (npr. kršitev človekovih pravic, namerna diskriminacija določenih skupin državljanov, obstoj represivnih režimov) in tudi vrsto socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih dejavnikov (npr. revščina, lakota, bolezni, nepismenost, omejenost naravnih virov, poslabšanje okolja, nepravični trgovski odnosi itd.), ki prispevajo k obstoječim regionalnim sporom, prenehanju delovanja državnih struktur v državah ter nastanku kriminalnih in terorističnih mrež, čeprav se v okviru zgoraj navedenih dejavnikov delovanje slednjih ne more razumeti kot opravičljivo na kakršen koli način ali v kakršni koli obliki;
Emphasises that only a comprehensive understanding of the concept of "security" can properly take into account both the influence of issues of political democratic concern (e.g. violation of human rights, wilful discrimination against particular groups of citizens, the existence of repressive regimes) and the wide range of social, economic and environmental factors (e.g. poverty, famine, disease, illiteracy, scarcity of natural resources, environmental degradation, inequitable trade relations, etc.) in contributing to existing regional conflicts, the failure of states and the emergence of criminal and terrorist networks, though the actions of the latter may not be seen as being justified in any way, shape or form by the above-mentioned factors;
na podlagi tega prihaja do enakih zaključkov kot so izraženi v EVS, torej, da lahko k varnejšemu svetu največ prispevajo različni instrumenti in programi pomoči, vključno s tistimi s področja razvojne politike, na ravni EU in držav članic v povezavi z diplomatskimi, civilnimi in vojaškimi zmogljivostmi in strokovnim znanjem;
Draws, therefore, the same conclusion as that expressed within the ESS that a combination of the various assistance programmes and instruments, including those of development policy, at both EU and Member State level, in conjunction with diplomatic, civilian and military capabilities and expertise can best serve to contribute to a more secure world;
se v celoti strinja s strateškimi cilji za Unijo, izraženimi v EVS: obravnavanje groženj; grajenje varnosti v soseščini Unije; in krepitev mednarodnega reda z učinkovitimi dejavnostmi preko učinkovitih večstranskih struktur; poudarja, da cilji EVS močno presegajo vojaške vidike Evropske varnostne in obrambne politike;
Agrees fully with the strategic objectives for the Union as expressed in the ESS: addressing the threats; building security in the Union's neighbourhood; and strengthening the international order via effective action through effective multilateral structures; emphasises that the objectives of the ESS go well beyond the military aspects of the European Security and Defence Policy;
opozarja, da je treba pri obravnavanju groženj določiti regionalne grožnje in/ali grožnje globalne narave, saj lahko Unija le tako učinkovito mobilizira instrumente in vire, ki so ji na voljo, za obravnavanje grožnje; opozarja, da je grajenje varnosti v soseščini Unije v veliki meri namenjeno reševanju groženj regionalne narave, medtem ko je grožnje globalne narave treba obravnavati z učinkovitimi večstranskimi mednarodnimi strukturami, v katerih je EU gonilna sila; prav tako pa opozarja, da lahko večstranske organizacije in strukture obravnavajo tudi regionalne grožnje;
Notes that, in addressing the threats, it will be necessary to determine those of a regional and/or those of a global nature, so that the Union can effectively mobilise its available instruments and resources in order to address the problem; notes that the establishment of security in the Union's neighbourhood will serve in large measure to counter threats of a regional nature, whereas those of a global nature must be tackled through effective multilateral international structures in which the EU is a driving force; notes, however, that multilateral organisations and structures may also be called upon to address regional threats;
se v celoti strinja z oceno, izraženo v novi sosedski politiki Unije in EVS, da je treba soseščino Unije razumeti v daljnosežnejšem smislu, ki pokriva ne le vzhodnoevropske države, ki mejijo na EU, ampak tudi regije, ki ležijo še dlje na vzhodu in jugu, kot so Kavkaz, Bližnji vzhod in Severna Afrika; opaža skladnost te politike z dolgotrajnimi dejavnostmi Unije pri iskanju rešitev izraelsko-arabskega spora, tudi z Barcelonskim procesom; poudarja, da sta demokracija in pravna država najbolj pomembna predpogoja za miren sožitje ljudstev;
Shares fully the view expressed in the Union's New Neighbourhood Policy and the ESS that the Union's neighbourhood should be understood in more far-reaching terms, covering not only those eastern European countries sharing borders with the EU but also regions further east and south, such as the Caucasus, the Middle East and northern Africa; notes the congruency of this policy with the continuing activities of the Union in seeking a resolution of the Arab-Israel conflict also through the Barcelona process; stresses that democracy and the rule of law are the most important preconditions for the peaceful coexistence of peoples;
poudarja primarnost OZN v večstranskem institucionalnem okviru in potrebo po tem, da EU prevzame vodilno vlogo pri oživljanju struktur in zmogljivosti te nujno potrebne ustanove; v zvezi s tem vzame na znanje poročilo, ki ga je prestavil generalni sekretar OZN, z naslovom "V večji svobodi: V smeri razvoju, varnosti in človekovim pravicam za vse" dne 21. marca 2005; pozdravlja to poročilo – brez poseganja v katero koli prihodnjo podrobno oceno Parlamenta – kot začetno točko razprave o preoblikovanju OZN v odgovor izzivom 21. stoletja; poziva EU in države članice k uskladitvi stališč znotraj okvira teh razprav, ob upoštevanju stalne podpore, ki jo kažejo javnomnenjske raziskave, za močnejše predstavništvo SZVP/EVOP po vsej EU od tistega, ki trenutno obstoja;
Emphasises the primacy of the UN within the multilateral institutional framework and the need for the EU to play a leading role in re-invigorating the structures and capabilities of this indispensable institution; takes note in this connection of the report presented by the Secretary-General of the UN entitled "In larger freedom: towards development, security, and human rights for all" on 21 March 2005; welcomes this report - without prejudice to any future detailed assessment by the Parliament - as the starting point for an open discussion on reforming the UN so that it may face the challenges of the 21st century; urges the EU and the Member States to coordinate their position within the framework of these discussions in full awareness of the consistent support demonstrated by public opinion surveys for a stronger representation of CFSP/ESDP through the EU than that which currently exists;
še naprej poudarja potrebo po vodilni vlogi Unije v sodelovanju z drugimi mednarodnimi in regionalnimi organizacijami, ki pospešujejo mir in varnost po svetu; poudarja še zlasti potrebo po popolnem sodelovanju z OVSE;
Underlines, further, the need for the Union to play a leading role in cooperating with other international and regional organisations that foster peace and security in the world; emphasises in particular the need for full cooperation with the OSCE;
poudarja, kako pomembno je, da si EU prizadeva za trdno in pošteno razvojno politiko, da se učinkovito prispeva k splošno priznanim razvojnim ciljem tisočletja;
Stresses that it is important for the EU to pursue a firm and fair development policy in order to contribute efficiently to the universally agreed Millennium Development Goals;
Nedavni mejniki EVOP
Recent ESDP milestones
opozarja na neprecenljivo izkušnjo, pridobljeno v civilnih in policijskih misijah v zadnjih dveh letih: prevzem nadzora s strani mednarodne policijske misije (zdaj EUPM) v Bosni in Hercegovini od 2003; misije PROXIMA v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji in misije EUJUST THEMIA v Gruziji; prav tako pozdravlja prihodnji namestitev policije Evropske unije v Demokratični republiki Kongo (EUPOL Kinšasa);
Notes the valuable experience gained in civilian and police missions over the course of the last two years, including: the assumption of control by the International Police Task Force (now EUPM) in Bosnia-Herzegovina since 2003; PROXIMA in The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and EUJUST THEMIS in Georgia; welcomes also the forthcoming deployment of a European Union police force in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (EUPOL Kinshasa);
priznava pomemben napredek pri širjenju vojaških zmogljivosti Unije; hkrati ugotavlja pomembnost okvira Berlin Plus, sklenjenega z NATO, zaradi katerega sta bili prva vojaška misija EU CONCORDIA v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji in misija ALTHEA v Bosni in Hercegovini sploh mogoči; se zaveda ugodne prilagodljivosti okvira Unije EVOP, saj dopušča tudi izvajanje operacije ARTEMIS v Demokratični republiki Kongo;
Recognises the significant progress made in expanding the military capabilities of the Union; at the same time notes the importance of the Berlin Plus Framework agreed with NATO, which made the first EU military mission CONCORDIA in FYROM and the ALTHEA mission to Bosnia-Herzegovina possible; acknowledges the advantageous flexibility of the Union's ESDP framework in further allowing the execution of Operation ARTEMIS in the Democratic Republic of the Congo;
poudarja dosedanje pozitivne prispevke situacijskega centra EU (SITCEN), saj ta združuje vse dostopne civilne, vojaške in diplomatske podatke in znanje, na podlagi katerih je mogoče izdelovati ključne analize ozadja katerih koli razmer; poziva države članice k nadaljnji krepitvi izmenjave podatkov s centrom SITCEN, da ne bi neupravičeno ovirale izpolnitve ciljev EVS;
Emphasises the positive contributions already made by the EU Situation Centre (SITCEN) in combining all available civil, military and diplomatic intelligence to produce cogent background analyses of any given situation; urges the Member States to further intensify their information-sharing with the SITCEN, so as not to unduly hinder the fulfilment of ambitions expressed in the ESS;
poudarja, da posebni značaj in dodatne prednosti EVOP izvirajo iz kombinacije civilnih in vojaških sestavin, in ugotavlja, ob upoštevanju omenjenih dosežkov, da bo EU v prihodnosti vedno bolj izzvana k iskanju dobrega in primernega ravnovesja med vojaškimi in civilnimi elementi, da bo lahko izpolnjevala cilje in duh EVS; meni, da bo misija ALTHEA v Bosni in Hercegovini v zvezi s tem zagotovila dragocene podatke, če bo Unija lahko uskladila vojaške ukrepe s civilnimi operacijami in programi, ki trenutno potekajo;
Emphasises that the defining characteristic and the additional value of the ESDP lie in the combination of civilian and military components and notes, in observance of the aforementioned accomplishments, that the EU will in future be increasingly faced with the challenge of striking a good and proper balance between military and civilian components in order to fulfil the objectives and the spirit of the ESS; takes the view that the ALTHEA mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina will provide valuable experience in this regard, in so far as the Union will be able to coordinate its military efforts with the civilian operations and programmes currently under way;
Napredek k poglavitnemu cilju za leto 2010 in civilnemu poglavitnemu cilju za leto 2008
Progress towards Headline Goal 2010 and towards a Civilian Headline Goal 2008
se strinja s cilji poglavitnega cilja za leto 2010, ki ga je uradno odobril Svet za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose (GAERC) dne 17. maja 2004, in s sporazumom o oblikovanju načrta za razvoj civilnega poglavitnega cilja za leto 2008, ki ga je dne 13. decembra 2004 odobril GAERC, saj predstavljajo način zbiranja sredstev, ki EU omogočajo zmogljivosti, potrebne za delovanje v skladu s strateškimi cilji EVS; meni, da bi morali biti ti bistveni in časovni cilji natančneje opredeljeni v Beli knjigi;
Agrees with the targets set out in the Headline Goal 2010 as formally adopted by the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) on 17 May 2004 and the agreement to work out a Civilian Headline Goal 2008 as approved by the GAERC on 13 December 2004 as a means of concentrating efforts to empower the EU with the necessary capabilities to pursue the ESS strategic objectives; considers that these substantive and time-related targets should be given concrete form in a White Paper;