natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
predlaga, da bi resno pretehtali zamisel o uvedbi neke oblike začasnega ukrepa Skupnosti, ki bi dopolnjeval ukrepe nacionalnih sodišč; meni, da bi lahko šlo za enostaven, prožen postopek, ki bi ga lahko izvajali po vsej Evropski uniji, ter se tako izognili zamudam in nepotrebnim stroškom; meni tudi, da bi bil tak postopek učinkovit in nepristranski do tretjih strani;
Suggests that consideration could be given to the idea of introducing a form of Community provisional measure additional to those of national courts; considers that this could take the form of a simple, flexible procedure to which effect could be given throughout the EU, thereby avoiding delay and unnecessary expense; takes the view that it would also be effective and fair to non-parties;
predlaga, da bi se takšen ukrep lahko uporabljal tudi pri arbitražah in da bi bil upoštevan v okviru napovedanega pregleda uredbe Bruselj I;
Proposes that such a measure could apply to arbitration claims as well and could also be taken into account in the context of the forthcoming review of the Brussels I Regulation;
poziva Komisijo, naj to vprašanje obravnava kot prednostno ter izvede (a) natančno oceno problema, (b) študijo izvedljivosti možnih instrumentov Skupnosti in (c) oceno učinka možnih pravnih sredstev Skupnosti za čezmejne vidike; meni, da bi morala Komisija ob tem tudi opredeliti in ustrezno utemeljiti ustrezno pravno podlago za vse predlagane instrumente Skupnosti, ki bi morali biti omejeni na čezmejne zadeve ter biti skladni z uporabo izključno nacionalnih pravnih sredstev s tega področja, in ne posegati vanje;
Calls on the Commission to treat this matter as a priority and to carry out (a) a detailed appraisal of the problem, (b) a feasibility study of possible Community instruments and (c) an impact assessment of possible Community-law remedies confined to trans-border aspects; considers that the Commission's inquiry should also identify and duly justify the proper legal basis for any Community instrument proposed, which should be limited to cross-border cases and be complementary to and not interfere with the application of purely national remedies in this area;
poziva Komisijo, naj v celoti preuči predpogodbene in pogodbene ukrepe, ki bi jih bilo mogoče povezati z razvojem skupnega referenčnega okvira in vseh drugih opcijskih instrumentov, ki bi izhajali iz njega, in zagotovi, da bodo pogodbene strani pri sklepanju evropskih čezmejnih pogodb upoštevale vprašanja zamud pri plačilih in neplačilih;
Urges the Commission fully to consider pre-contractual and contractual measures that could be linked with the development of the CFR and any optional instrument deriving therefrom, so as to ensure that parties to European cross-border contracts consider issues of late payment and non-payment when contracting;
nestrpno pričakuje revizijo direktive o zamudah pri plačilih in poziva Komisijo, naj glede na sedanje gospodarsko ozračje pri tem čim bolj pohiti;
Eagerly anticipates the review of the Late Payments Directive and urges the Commission to proceed with this as quickly as possible, given the current economic climate;
priporoča, da bi bilo treba opraviti študijo o razhajajočih se nacionalnih pravnih pristopih glede pridržka lastninske pravice in drugih podobnih mehanizmov, da bi se zagotovilo njihovo vzajemno priznavanje;
Suggests that a study should be carried out of the divergent national legal approaches to retention of title and other similar mechanisms, with a view to ensuring their mutual recognition;
predlaga, da bi pogodbene stranke z lastninskimi pravicami, ki so jim bile priznane s sodbo sodišča, lahko uveljavile te pravice pod istimi pogoji kot odstopnik;
Suggests that a party who has acquired proprietary rights recognised in a court judgment should be able to enforce those rights under the same conditions as the transferor;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2009 o odločitvah Odbora za peticije v letu 2008 ( 2008/2301(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 22 April 2009 on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2008 ( 2008/2301(INI) )
ob upoštevanju izidov misij za ugotavljanje dejstev iz leta 2008 v Romuniji, Bolgariji in Franciji ter ustrezajočih poročil in priporočil, ki jih je odbor sprejel,
having regard to the results of the fact-finding missions undertaken by the Commission in 2008 to Romania, Bulgaria, and France and the corresponding reports and recommendations approved by the Committee,
ob upoštevanju členov 21 in 194 Pogodbe ES, ki daje državljanom in prebivalcem Evropske unije pravico nasloviti peticijo na Evropski parlament,
having regard to Articles 21 and 194 of the EC Treaty, which confer on all EU citizens and residents the right to petition the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0232/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0232/2009 ),
ker priznava pomembnost postopka za obravnavanje peticij in njegove posebne značilnosti, ki omogočajo pristojnemu odboru, da poišče rešitve in pojasnila za državljane EU, ki na Parlament naslovijo peticijo,
recognising the importance of the petitions process and its specific attributes, which enable the responsible committee to seek solutions and explanations for EU citizens who petition Parliament,
ker vedno več državljanov EU na Parlament naslovi peticijo, Odbor za peticije pa si prizadeva še pospešiti svoje postopke, da bi državljanom, ki ga prosijo za pomoč, zagotovil čim boljše storitve,
having regard to the growing number of EU citizens who petition Parliament, together with the efforts by the Committee on Petitions to further expedite its procedures in order to provide a better service for citizens seeking its assistance,
ker morajo organi Parlamenta izpolniti še kar nekaj priporočil iz letnega poročila 2007, kot je zahtevek za nujno izboljšanje administrativnih virov Odbora za peticije, tudi jezikovnega in pravnega strokovnega znanja, da bi povečali zmogljivosti Parlamenta za izvajanje neodvisnih preiskav o vloženih peticijah, in na primer tesnejše sodelovanje z omrežjem SOLVIT na področju peticij in pritožb glede notranjega trga, ali ustanovitev skupnega portala EU za evropske državljane,
whereas several of the recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report are yet to be implemented by Parliament's authorities, such as the request for an urgent improvement of the administrative resources, including linguistic and legal expertise, of its Committee on Petitions in order to increase Parliament's capacity to conduct independent investigations of petitions addressed to it, and, for instance, closer cooperation with SOLVIT in the field of petitions and complaints regarding the internal market, and the establishment of a common EU portal for European citizens,
ker upošteva, da državljani kljub znatnemu napredku pri razvoju struktur in politik Unije v tem obdobju neposredno občutijo številne pomanjkljivosti pri uporabi politik in programov Unije, saj neposredno vplivajo nanje in so pogosto tudi tema vloženih peticij,
mindful of the fact that, in spite of considerable progress in the development of the structures and policies of the Union during this period, citizens remain directly aware of many shortcomings in the application of the policies and programmes of the Union as they affect them directly, and whereas these are frequently the subject of petitions received,
ker bo institut državljanske pobude iz Lizbonske pogodbe omogočil še večje sodelovanje javnosti pri dejavnostih in delu Evropske unije,
whereas the institution of the 'Citizens' Initiative' under the Treaty of Lisbon will result in even greater public participation in the activities and work of the European Union,
ker ima zaradi tega Parlament odgovornost, da v interesu državljanov in prebivalcev EU zagotovi boljšo uporabo prava Skupnosti v posameznih državah članicah ter z njimi sodeluje za izpolnitev tega cilja,
whereas, consequently, Parliament has a responsibility to ensure better application of Community law by the individual Member States in the interests of EU citizens and residents, and thus to work in cooperation with Member States to achieve this objective,
ker so mnoge države članice kljub temu še vedno zadržane glede dejavnega sodelovanja s pristojnim odborom (predvsem se ne udeležujejo se njegovih sej), to pa kaže na pomanjkanje lojalnega sodelovanja z institucijo,
whereas, however, many Member States remain reluctant to cooperate actively with the responsible committee, in particular by failing to attend meetings of the committee, and whereas this denotes a lack of loyal cooperation with the institution,
ker pa priznava, da mnoge države članice dobro sodelujejo s Parlamentom in si prizadevajo odgovoriti na skrbi državljanov, ki jih ti izražajo z vlaganjem peticij,
recognising, however, that many Member States demonstrate a good level of cooperation and work with Parliament in an effort to respond to the concerns of citizens as expressed through the petitions process,
ker priznava ustvarjalni prispevek služb Komisije k postopku obravnavanja peticij, saj na zahtevo pristojnega odbora redno zagotavljajo predhodne ocene številnih prejetih peticij,
recognising the constructive contribution made to the petitions process by the services of the Commission, which regularly provide, at the request of the responsible committee, preliminary assessments of many petitions received,
ker bi se dalo to sodelovanje še izboljšati, predvsem glede postopkov iz členov 226 in 228 Pogodbe ES v ustrezno utemeljenih postopkih,
whereas such cooperation could and should be further enhanced, notably as regards procedures pursuant to Articles 226 and 228 of the EC Treaty in duly justified cases,
ker Parlament meni, da bi skladno s členom 230 Pogodbe ES po potrebi lahko pravno utemeljeno uvedel ustrezne ukrepe za odpravo hujših kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki jih odkrije med preiskavami peticij, ali v primerih, kjer je Parlament kljub poskusom usklajevanja in po posvetu s svojo pravno službo še vedno drugačnega mnenja kot Komisija, kar se tiče ukrepov, ki jih za varstvo državljanskih pravic v zadevnih primerih določa zakonodaja Skupnosti,
whereas Parliament has considered that it would be legitimate for it to make use of its powers under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, if this proved necessary in order to put an end to a serious infringement of Community law which has been revealed in the course of examination of a petition and where a significant difference of interpretation persists, despite efforts to resolve it, between Parliament and the Commission, as regards the action required under Community law for the protection of citizens' rights in the case concerned,
ker postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev ni rešitev za vlagatelje peticij, četudi mora država članica po nalogu Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti spremeniti svojo zakonodajo, da jo uskladi z zakonodajnimi akti Skupnosti,
whereas the infringement procedure does not provide a remedy for petitioners even when a Member State is obliged by the Court of Justice to modify its legislation so as to bring it into conformity with EU legislative acts,
ker je nezmožnost za zagotovitev zunajsodne rešitve neposredno za državljane EU, ki so ali so bili žrtve neustrezne uporabe prava EU, temeljna krivica, ki jo morajo nadalje obravnavati institucije EU, zlasti Parlament,
whereas the inability to provide a non-judicial remedy directly to EU citizens who have been or have become victims of the lack of proper application of EU law constitutes a basic injustice which requires further consideration by the EU institutions, and in particular by Parliament,
ker ima Parlament po členu 230 Pogodbe ES pravico, da se obrne na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, in ker Parlament v skladu s členom 201 te pogodbe nadzira dejavnosti Komisije in ima zato na voljo tako pravna kot politična sredstva za učinkovitejši odgovor na legitimna vprašanja državljanov,
whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission and whereas, pursuant to Article 201 of the EC Treaty, Parliament is empowered to exercise control over the activities of the Commission and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
ker bi moral Parlament pregledati svoje postopke, da bi poenostavil postopke pred Sodiščem, zlasti po členu 121 svojega Poslovnika, kadar so ogrožene pravice vlagateljev peticij,
whereas Parliament should review its own procedures in order to facilitate actions, notably under Rule 121 of its Rules of Procedure, before the Court of Justice when the rights of petitioners are at stake,
ker je treba opozoriti, da temelji Unija po členu 6 Pogodbe ES na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, ki so temeljne sestavine köbenhavnskih meril za pristop k EU, in ker člen 7 Pogodbe EU določa posebne postopke, ki se lahko sprožijo ob hudih in stalnih kršitvah navedenih načel ali očitni nevarnosti zanje,
whereas it should be recalled that, pursuant to Article 6 of the EU Treaty, the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which also constitute a basic element of the Copenhagen criteria for accession to the EU, and whereas Article 7 of the EU Treaty lays down specific procedures which can be initiated for serious and persistent breaches of the principles mentioned, or a clear risk thereof,
ker upošteva predloge resolucij na podlagi člena 192(1) Poslovnika Parlamenta, vloženih na plenarnih zasedanjih leta 2008 in sprejetih s prepričljivo večino poslancev, na podlagi prejetih peticij o vplivu plinovoda Severni tok pod Baltskim morjem in o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve,
mindful of the motions for resolutions submitted to plenary in 2008 and adopted by an overwhelming majority of Members, pursuant to Rule 192(1) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure on the basis of petitions received concerning the impact of the Nord Stream gas pipeline under the Baltic Sea and concerning misleading directory companies,
ker je večja zaskrbljenost glede zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo privedla do projektov za plinovode in za utekočinjeni zemeljski plin, ki – zlasti če so pripravljeni na hitro ter brez ustrezne ocene tveganja in alternativnih možnosti – pri vlagateljih peticij povzročajo zaskrbljenost zaradi premajhnega upoštevanja hude nevarnosti za okolje in človekovo zdravje, predvsem pri projektih v Baltskem morju, Walesu in na Irskem,
whereas increased concerns over energy supply security have resulted in projects for pipelines for natural gas and liquefied natural gas which, especially when they are rushed through without proper evaluation of the risks and alternatives, have raised petitioners' concerns over the lack of consideration given to potentially serious risks to the environment and human health and safety in respect of, notably, projects in the Baltic Sea, Wales and Ireland,
ker je iz obravnave peticij jasno, da seznam projektov, ki so omenjeni v prilogah k Direktivi Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
whereas it is evident from the examination of petitions that the lists of projects mentioned in the Annexes to Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
, kakor je bila spremenjena, ne zajema številnih pomembnejših objektov in dejavnosti, ki so nastali po zadnjih spremembah teh prilog, na primer uplinjevalnikov ali obratov za pridelavo biodizla,
, as amended, do not cover a number of important installations and activities which have emerged since the latest amendments to those Annexes, such as re-gasification plants and bio-diesel plants,
ker številne vložene peticije, povezane z omrežjem Natura 2000, nenehno kažejo, da je preprečevanje izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti velik izziv za Unijo in da sta direktivi o habitatih Direktiva Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst (UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
whereas the many petitions presented in relation to the Natura 2000 network have continued to show that ending loss of biodiversity constitutes a major challenge for the Union and that the Habitats Directive Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
in pticah Direktiva Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic (UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
and the Birds Directive Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
temeljni in nepogrešljivi orodji EU za izpolnitev njene zaveze o preprečevanju izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010,
constitute basic and indispensable tools for fulfilling the EU's commitment to end biodiversity loss by 2010,
W ker želi spomniti na priporočila Odbora za peticije po njegovih obiskih v kraju Fos-sur-Mer, na Cipru in v Romuniji,
mindful of the recommendations made by the Committee on Petitions following visits to Fos-sur-Mer, Cyprus and Romania,
ker upošteva zaskrbljenost, ki jo je Odbor za peticije izrazil glede nekaterih infrastrukturnih projektov v gorovju Rila v Bolgariji, ki jih je opazil med misijo za ugotavljanje dejstev leta 2008,
bearing in mind the concern expressed by the Committee on Petitions in relation to certain infrastructure projects in the Rila Mountains in Bulgaria, observed during a fact-finding visit in 2008,
ker priznava pozitivno in konstruktivno sodelovanje z Evropskim varuhom človekovih pravic v letu 2008, podporo Odbora za peticije za priporočila iz njegovega letnega poročila 2007 ter njegovi posebni poročili o pritožbah št. 1487/2005/ in 3453/2005/ o uporabi jezikov v Svetu in o tem, kako Komisija uporablja postopke za ugotavljanje kršitev, ter pozdravlja spremembe v varuhovem statutu, ki jih je potrdil Parlament,
recognising the positive and constructive cooperation with the European Ombudsman in 2008, the support provided by the Committee on Petitions for the recommendations contained in his Annual Report for 2007 and his Special Reports on complaints 1487/2005/ and 3453/2005/ respectively concerning the use of languages by the Council and the Commission's application of the infringement procedure, and welcoming the modifications to his Statute approved by Parliament,
ker je Odbor za peticije leta 2008 prejel 1886 peticij, od katerih jih je bilo 1065 dopustnih, 821 pa nedopustnih; ker je število peticij, ki ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz člena 191(1) poslovnika Parlamenta, od začetka 2007, znatno naraslo,
whereas in 2008 the Committee on Petitions received 1 886 petitions, of which 1 065 were declared admissible and 821 were declared inadmissible; whereas the number of petitions that do not meet the conditions of Rule 191(1) of the Rules of Procedure has significantly risen since the beginning of 2007,
pozdravlja zavzetost in prispevek vlagateljev peticij na vseh sejah Odbora za peticije, saj je to omogočilo neposreden in odprt dialog s predstavniki Evropskega parlamenta ter še naprej spodbuja posamezne državljane EU in združenja v skupnostih, da opozarjajo na zaskrbljujoča vprašanja s področja delovanja Evropske unije, ki jih neposredno zadevajo; ob tem verjame, da ta proces Parlamentu kot instituciji daje pomembno vlogo pri spremljanju, kako države članice uporabljajo pravo Skupnosti, ter da bolje varuje in spodbuja temeljne pravice vseh državljanov EU, kakor jih določa Pogodba o EU;
Welcomes the involvement and contribution of petitioners at each meeting of the Committee on Petitions, which allows for a direct and open dialogue with European Parliament representatives and continues to encourage individual EU citizens and community associations to come forward with issues which concern the area of activity of the European Union and which affect them directly, believing that this process enables Parliament as an institution to play a significant role in monitoring the application of Community law by the Member States and to better defend and promote the fundamental rights of all EU citizens as defined in the EU Treaty;
poudarja, da Parlament, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, peticij, ki vsebujejo pritožbo proti odločitvam pristojnih organov ali sodnih organov držav članic, ne more šteti za dopustne, to informacijo pa je treba vlagateljem peticij sporočiti na jasen in razumljiv način; poudarja pa, da morajo pritožbe izpolniti pogoje iz člena 191(1) Poslovnika Parlamenta, da se lahko označijo za dopustne;
Emphasises that, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, Parliament cannot regard as admissible petitions which seek to appeal against decisions of competent authorities or judicial bodies of Member States and that information to that effect must be communicated in a clear and understandable way to the petitioners; emphasises, moreover, that complaints must fulfil the conditions of Rule 191(1) of Parliament's Rules of Procedure before they can be declared admissible;
poziva, naj se v doglednem času izvedejo priporočila, ki so bila sprejeta v letnem poročilu 2007 in še niso izpolnjena;
Calls for those recommendations adopted in the 2007 Annual Report which have not yet been implemented to be implemented within a reasonable timeframe;
poziva Komisijo, vse države članice in njihove nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne institucije ter njihove stalne predstavnike, naj pri preiskovanju domnev ali obravnavanju predlogov iz peticij lojalno, konstruktivno in v celoti sodelujejo s pristojnim odborom Evropskega parlamenta, da bi našli rešitve za vprašanja, na katera so opozorjeni v procesu obravnavanja peticij;
Calls on the Commission, all Member States and their national, regional and local institutions, together with their Permanent Representatives, to cooperate fully with the responsible committee of the European Parliament when investigating allegations or proposals contained in petitions, on a loyal and constructive basis, with a view to finding solutions to issues raised through the petitions process;
poziva, naj se morebitni postopki v celoti revidirajo, da bi državljanom EU omogočili ustrezne pravne poti, ki jih bodo izvajali pristojni organi Evropskega parlamenta, Komisije in Sveta, in naj se začnejo pogajanja o novem Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, ki bo zajemal okrepljene pristojnosti preiskovalnih odborov, zato da bi še okrepili pravice državljanov EU;
Requests that a full review of possible procedures to ensure remedial action for EU citizens be conducted by the responsible bodies in the European Parliament, the Commission and Council, and that a new interinstitutional agreement incorporating reinforced powers for committees of inquiry be negotiated in order to further strengthen the rights of EU citizens;
meni, da bi takšna revizija dopolnila morebitno izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe, saj bi omogočila dodatna varovala, ki bi temeljila na priznanih pravicah in dolžnostih državljanov ter institucij EU;
Believes that such a review would complement any eventual implementation of the Lisbon Treaty by providing additional safeguards based on the declared rights and obligations of EU citizens and EU institutions;
poudarja, da so spoštovanje in uveljavljanje temeljnih vrednot Unije ter zagovarjanje demokracije, pravne države in temeljnih pravic posebna odgovornost Parlamenta kot neposredno izvoljenega zastopnika evropskih državljanov, kot je bilo izraženo v njegovi resoluciji z dne 20. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o členu 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
Recalls that, as emphasised by Parliament in its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the Commission communication on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.