natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zagovarja stališče, da bi morala podpora, ki se zagotavlja prek svetovnega mehanizma za ogljik v gozdovih, temeljiti na uspešnosti ter da bi bilo treba to podporo zagotavljati na podlagi preverjenih rezultatov pri zmanjšanju bruto krčenja gozdov in njihovega uničevanja; poudarja, da bi morala ta podpora omogočati tudi dodatne koristi v povezavi z zaščito biotske raznovrstnosti, povečanjem odpornosti in boljšim preživljanjem v gozdnih regijah;
Advocates that the support provided via the GFCM should be performance-based and provided on the basis of verified results in terms of reduction of gross deforestation and forest degradation; stresses that this support should also provide co-benefits in terms of biodiversity protection, increased resilience, and improved livelihoods in forest regions;
poudarja, da je treba v celoti spoštovati pravice ljudi, vezanih na lokalne gozdove, vključno s pravico domorodnih ljudstev do svobodnega, predhodnega in informiranega konsenza za uporabo gozdov, ki jih običajno uporabljajo ta ljudstva; meni, da je bistvenega pomena, da se lokalne skupnosti in domorodna ljudstva smiselno in celovito vključijo v vse faze ocenjevanja, načrtovanja in izvajanja ukrepov za zmanjšanje emisij, ki so posledica krčenja gozdov in njihovega uničenja;
Emphasises the need to fully respect the rights of local forest people including indigenous peoples' right to free, prior and informed consent to the use of forests customarily used by them; considers it essential that local communities and indigenous peoples are involved in a meaningful and comprehensive way at all stages when measures for reduced emissions from forest degradation and deforestation are being assessed, planned and implemented;
poudarja, da bi moral vsak mehanizem v okviru programa sodelovanja Združenih narodov za zmanjšanje emisij zaradi krčenja in propadanja gozdov v državah v razvoju, ki se sklene kot del mednarodnega sporazuma o podnebju za obdobje po letu 2012, zagotavljati predvsem zaščito pragozdov;
Stresses that any mechanism under the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries that is concluded as part of the post-2012 international climate agreement should first and foremost ensure that old-growth forests are protected;
ugotavlja, da proces krčenja gozdov v vzhodni Evropi prispeva k uničevanju naravnega okolja ter med drugim vpliva tudi na kakovost življenja;
Notes that the process of deforestation in placeEastern Europe is contributing to the degradation of the natural environment and also affecting quality of life, inter alia;
meni, da bi bili lahko gozdni dobropisi na trgu ogljika srednjeročna in dolgoročna sestavina v kombinaciji politik glede krčenja gozdov, če bo mogoče zagotoviti natančno metodologijo za izračunavanje ogljika v gozdovih in zanesljive mehanizme spremljanja; poudarja, da je treba končno odločitev o vključitvi gozdnih dobropisih v evropski sistem za trgovanje z emisijami sprejeti po podrobni analizi izvedljivosti za vse potencialne mehanizme financiranja ter po oceni izidov konference pogodbenic v Köbenhavnu in ugotovitvah, pridobljenih iz pilotnih projektov;
Notes that forest credits in the carbon market could in the medium and long term, be part of a mix of policies addressing deforestation, if accurate forest carbon accounting methodologies and reliable monitoring mechanisms can be ensured; stresses that a final decision regarding the inclusion of forest credits in the ETS should be taken following a rigorous analysis of the feasibility of all potential funding mechanisms and an evaluation of the outcome of the Copenhagen Conference of the Parties and of the conclusions drawn from the pilot projects;
opozarja, da morebitnih dobropisov iz gozdnih projektov, ki se uporabljajo za nadomeščanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v industrializiranih državah, ni mogoče šteti dvakrat, torej tudi v korist ciljev preusmerjanja od „običajnega“ poslovanja, za katere se pričakuje, da jih bodo razvite države prevzele s sporazumom o podnebju za obdobje po letu 2012;
Recalls that any credits from forest projects that are used to offset greenhouse gas emissions in industrialised countries cannot be double-counted towards the deviation targets from 'business as usual' that developing countries are expected to commit to in the post-2012 international climate agreement;
poudarja, da mora vsak sistem nadomestil za zmanjševanje krčenja in propadanja gozdov v okviru prihodnjega podnebnega režima upoštevati ogljikove ponore, pa tudi storitve ekosistemov in družbene koristi gozdov;
Points out that any system of compensation for reducing deforestation and forest degradation under a future climate regime must take into account not only carbon sinks but also the ecosystem services and social benefits provided by forests;
poziva EU, naj spodbuja močne socialne in okoljske standarde za zmanjševanje emisij zaradi krčenja gozdov in njihovega uničenja; poziva EU, naj podpira mehanizme za zmanjševanje emisij zaradi krčenja gozdov v državah v razvoju, ki presegajo sedanji pristop na podlagi projektov mehanizmov čistega razvoja in obravnavajo temeljne razloge za krčenje gozdov, kot so slabo upravljanje, revščina, korupcija in pomanjkanje kazenskega pregona, in sicer s podporo politične in institucionalne reforme na lokalni ter nacionalni ravni;
Calls on the EU to promote strong social and environmental standards for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD); calls on the EU to advocate REDD mechanisms that go beyond the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project approach and address underlying causes of deforestation, such as poor governance, poverty, corruption and lack of law enforcement, by supporting policy and institutional reform at both local and national levels;
obžaluje, da sporočilo kljub svojemu naslovu ne obravnava propadanja gozdov; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije akcijske načrte in pilotne projekte ter v svoji gozdarski politiki pokaže predanost ne le za ustavitev krčenja gozdov, temveč tudi za ustavitev propadanja gozdov (tudi v Evropski uniji), in sicer, tudi z razvojem in vzpostavljanjem ustreznih sistemov spremljanja, da se pridobijo ustrezni podatki o tleh in biomasi v gozdovih;
Regrets that the Communication, contrary to its title, does not deal with forest degradation; calls on the Commission to develop action plans and pilot projects and to show commitment in its own forestry policy to stopping not only deforestation but also forest degradation (including in the European Union) by also developing and establishing proper monitoring systems in order to obtain appropriate data on soil and biomass in forests;
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0489/2008 in B6‑0494/2008
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0489/2008 and B6‑0494/2008
o letni razpravi o napredku v letu 2008 v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 Pogodbe o EU)
on the annual debate on the progress made in 2008 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o letni razpravi o napredku v letu 2008 v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 Pogodbe o EU)
European Parliament resolution on the annual debate on the progress made in 2008 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6 in 39 Pogodbe o EU ter členov 13, 17 do 22, 61 do 69, 255 in 286 pogodbe o ES, ki so poglavitna pravna podlaga za razvoj EU in Skupnosti kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
having regard to Articles 2, 6 and 39 of the EU Treaty and Articles 13, 17 to 22, 61 to 69, 255 and 286 of the EC Treaty, which form the main legal bases for the development of the EU and the Community as an area of freedom, security and justice,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor za Svet ( B6-0489/2008 ) in za Komisijo ( B6-0494/2008 ), o katerih je potekala razprava na plenarnem zasedanju 17. decembra 2008 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+PV+20081217+ITEM-014+DOC+XML+V0//IT&amp;language=EN http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+PV+20081217+ITEM-014+DOC+XML+V0//IT&amp;language=EN ,
having regard to Oral Questions to the Council ( B6-0489/2008 ) and to the Commission ( B6-0494/2008 ), debated in plenary on 17 December 2008 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+PV+20081217+ITEM-014+DOC+XML+V0//IT&amp;language=EN ,
ker je deset let po začetku veljavnosti amsterdamske pogodbe:
whereas ten years after the entry into force of the Treaty of Amsterdam:
– pravni red Skupnosti na področju pravice, svobode in varnosti bistveno bolj obsežen, s čimer se je potrdila izbira držav članic, da institucije Evropske unije v veliki meri vključijo v oblikovanje politik na tem področju, da se državljanom Evropske unije zagotovijo svoboda, varnost in pravica,
– the EU acquis on justice, freedom and security has been growing significantly, thereby confirming the choice made by the Member States to involve the European Union institutions extensively in policy-making in this area so as to ensure freedom, security and justice to Union citizens,
– večina državljanov EU – kot ugotavljajo redne raziskave Eurobarometra – vedno bolj prepričana, da imajo ukrepi na ravni EU dodano vrednost v primerjavi s tistimi, ki se sprejmejo le na nacionalni ravni, in ker dve tretjini državljanov podpirata ukrepe na ravni EU za podporo in varovanje temeljnih pravic (tudi otrokovih pravic) ter za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu ter samo 18 % meni, da ukrepi na ravni EU niso prinesli dodatnih koristi,
– a majority of Union citizens, according to Eurobarometer periodic surveys, increasingly feel that EU-level actions have an added value compared to those taken solely at a national level and two thirds of citizens support EU-level actions which promote and protect fundamental rights (including children’s rights), as well as the fight against organised crime and terrorism, and only 18% consider that EU-level actions have had no extra benefit,
ker omenjeni pozitivni dejavniki ne morejo izravnati:
whereas the positive factors mentioned above cannot offset:
– ohranjanja pravne slabosti in zapletenosti postopkov sprejemanja odločitev v EU, zlasti na področju, kot je policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah, ki na ravni EU nima ustreznega demokratičnega in sodnega nadzora,
– the persistent legal weakness and complexity of the EU decision-making process, notably in areas such as police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, which lack an appropriate democratic and judicial control at EU level,
– odpora večine držav članic do krepitve politik, ki so povezane s temeljnimi pravicami in pravicami državljanov; obenem se zdi vedno bolj pomembno tudi osredotočanje na čezmejne zadeve, da se preprečijo dvojna merila v isti državi članici,
– the reluctance of a majority of the Member States to strengthen policies linked to fundamental rights and citizens' rights; at the same time it appears increasingly essential to focus not only on cross-border cases, in order to avoid double standards within the same Member State,
– stalne potrebe, da se še naprej razvija in ustrezno izvaja skupna politika EU o priseljevanju in azilu, ki je v zaostanku za sprejetim časovnim načrtom v haškem programu in evropskem paktu o priseljevanju in azilu,
– the continuing need to further develop and correctly implement the EU common immigration and asylum policy, which is facing delays in relation to the timetable agreed on in the Hague Programme and the European Immigration and Asylum Pact,
– težav, s katerimi se sooča Komisija pri zagotavljanju pravočasnega in pravilnega izvajanja velikega dela zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki je bila sprejeta pred kratkim, ter hkratnem obvladovanju velikega obsega dopisov, pritožb in rastočega števila zadev, povezanih s kršitvami,
– the difficulties faced by the Commission in ensuring the timely and correct implementation of much recently adopted Community legislation, together with managing a high volume of correspondence, complaints and a growing infringements case-load,
– potrebe po obsežnejšem sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov pri ocenjevanju resničnega vpliva zakonodaje EU na terenu,
– the need for a more extensive involvement of the European Parliament and national parliaments in assessing the real impact of EU legislation on the ground,
– še vedno ne dovolj razvitega omrežja predstavnikov civilne družbe in zainteresiranih strani v vsaki politiki o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice; opozoriti velja, da so se ministri za pravosodje držav članic šele pred kratkim odločili za oblikovanje omrežja, ki je namenjeno medsebojni krepitvi nacionalnih zakonodaj, in da bi bilo treba enako storiti tudi na drugih področjih, ki zadevajo območje svobode, varnosti in pravice,
– the still underdeveloped network of representatives of civil society and stakeholders in each AFSJ policy; it is worth noting that only recently the Ministers of Justice of the Member States decided to build a network aimed at mutually strengthening their national legislation and the same should be done for the other AFSJ areas,
– dejstva, da se sodelovanje razvija počasi celo med agencijami EU ter da obstaja tveganje, da bo položaj postal še bolj zapleten zaradi povečanja števila drugih organov z operativnimi nalogami na ravni EU,
– the fact that, even between EU agencies, cooperation is developing slowly and the situation risks becoming even more complex with the multiplication of other bodies with operational tasks at EU level,
ker je treba opozoriti na:
whereas it is necessary to recall:
– previdno stališče, ki sta ga vedno zavzela Svet in Komisija po tem, ko je Parlament sprejel resolucijo z dne 25. septembra 2008 o letni razpravi o napredku v letu 2007 v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0458 . , ter med razpravami na plenarnem zasedanju decembra 2008 o varstvu temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji in o napredku v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice,
– the continuing prudent position taken by the Council and by the Commission following the adoption by Parliament of its resolution of 25 September 2008 on the annual debate on the progress made in 2007 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0458 . , and during the plenary debates in December 2008 on the protection of fundamental rights in the European Union and on progress in the AFSJ,
– podporo, ki so jo nacionalni parlamenti namenili širšemu medparlamentarnemu sodelovanju, zlasti glede območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, kar dokazujejo njihovi prispevki za splošno razpravo in ob posebnih priložnostih, kot glede revizije pravil EU o preglednosti, okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu UL L 164, 22.6.2002, str.
– the support given by national parliaments to wider inter-parliamentary cooperation notably in the AFSJ, as demonstrated by their contributions to the general debates and on specific occasions such as to the revision of the EU rules on transparency, Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p.
3. , nove zakonodaje EU o evidenci imen letalskih potnikov Predlog okvirnega sklepa Sveta o uporabi evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) za namene kazenskega pregona (KOM(2007)0654). , izvajanja Direktive 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov, da se prosto gibljejo in prebivajo na ozemlju držav članic UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str.
3. , the new EU-PNR legislation Proposal for a Council framework decision on the use of Passenger Name Record (PNR) for law enforcement purposes (COM(2007)0654). , the implementation of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p.
77. , ocene Direktive Sveta 2003/9/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil UL L 31, 6.2.2003, str.
77. , the assessment of Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers OJ L 31, 6.2.2003, p.
18. ter glede izvajanja pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih in civilnih zadevah,
18. and to the implementation of judicial cooperation in criminal and civil matters,
poziva države članice, ki še niso ratificirale lizbonske pogodbe, naj to čim prej storijo, saj se s to pogodbo presežejo pomembnejše pomanjkljivosti območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, in sicer z:
Calls on those Member States which have not ratified the Treaty of Lisbon to do so as soon as possible, as it will overcome the more significant shortcomings in the AFSJ by:
– oblikovanjem skladnejšega, preglednejšega in pravno dobro premišljenega okvira,
– creating a more coherent, transparent and legally sound framework,
– krepitvijo varstva temeljnih pravic s tem, ko dobi Listini Unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljevanju „listina“) zavezujoč pravni značaj Besedilo listine: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:0001:0016:EN:PDF http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:0001:0016:EN:PDF Razlaga: in se EU omogoči, da pristopi k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– strengthening the protection of fundamental rights by giving binding force to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union Text of the Charter: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:0001:0016:EN:PDF Explanations: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:0017:0035:EN:PDF (hereafter 'the Charter') and by allowing the EU to accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
– dajanjem več odgovornosti državljanom Unije in civilni družbi, in sicer tako, da se jih vključuje v zakonodajni proces in se jim zagotavlja večji dostop do Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti,
– empowering citizens of the placeUnion and civil society by involving them in the legislative process and granting them greater access to the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ),
– vključevanjem Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v ocenjevanje politik EU, zaradi česar bodo evropska in nacionalne uprave bolj odgovorne;
– involving the European Parliament and national parliaments in the evaluation of EU policies, thereby making European and national administrations more accountable;
Evropski svet, Svet in Komisijo poziva, naj:
Calls on the European Council, the Council and the Commission to:
(b) se osredotočijo na prihodnji večletni program in predvsem na izboljšanje temeljnih pravic in pravic državljanov, kot je nedavno priporočil Parlament Glej resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 14. januarja 2009 o razmerah na področju temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji v obdobju 2004–2008 (Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0019 ). , in sicer z razvijanjem ciljev in načel iz listine, ki so jo institucije razglasile leta 2000 v Nici in ponovno 12. decembra 2007 v Lizboni;
(b) focus on the future multiannual programme, and primarily on the improvement of fundamental and citizens' rights, as recently recommended by Parliament See its resolution of 14 January 2009 on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union 2004-2008 (Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0019 ). , by developing the objectives and principles laid down in the Charter, which the institutions proclaimed in Nice in 2000 and again in Lisbon on 12 December 2007;
se mu zdi nujno in primerno, da Komisija:
Considers it urgent and appropriate that the Commission:
(a) sprejme nujne pobude za izboljšanje varstva pravic državljanov, kot so varstvo podatkov, pravice do diplomatskega in konzularnega varstva ter svobode gibanja in prebivanja;
(a) take urgent initiatives to improve the protection of citizens' rights such as data protection, diplomatic and consular protection and freedom of movement and residence;
(b) razvije mehanizem za zagotavljanje obsežnejšega sodelovanja državljanov pri opredeljevanju vsebine državljanstva Unije z razvijanjem mehanizmov posvetovanja in podpiranjem omrežij zainteresiranih strani;
(b) develop a mechanism to ensure a more extensive involvement of citizens in the definition of the content of citizenship of the placeUnion by developing consultation mechanisms and supporting stakeholder networks;
(c) predloži popoln program ukrepov EU, s katerimi se okrepijo procesne pravice obtožencev in jamstva, ki so potrebna v fazah pred začetkom in po koncu sojenja, zlasti, ko gre za osebe, ki niso državljani zadevne države, ter bolj splošno, naj razvije preverjanje evropskih kazenskopravnih in varnostnih ukrepov, kar zadeva varstvo pravic državljanov;
(c) submit a fully fledged programme of EU measures strengthening the procedural rights of defendants and the necessary safeguards in the pre-trial and post-trial phases, notably when they involve a non-national of the country concerned, and more generally develop screening of European criminal justice and security measures with regard to the protection of citizens´ rights;
(d) redno zbira in razširja vse pomembne nepristranske podatke o razvoju glavnih politik, povezanih z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, kot na primer o migracijskih tokovih, razvoju organiziranega kriminala in zlasti terorizma (glej oceno nevarnosti organiziranega kriminala v EU (OCTA) in poročilo o stanju in trendih na področju terorizma v EU (TE-SAT), ki ju je pripravil Europol);
(d) collect and disseminate, on a regular basis, all the relevant neutral data on the evolution of the main AFSJ policies such as migratory flows, the evolution of organised crime and in particular of terrorism (see the EU Organised Crime Threat Assessment (OCTA) and the EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT) by Europol);
(e) čim prej predstavi manjkajoče pravne instrumente o drugih kategorijah delavcev iz tretjih držav, upravičenih do „modre karte EU“, kot so sezonski delavci, premeščenci znotraj podjetja in plačani pripravniki, ter o mandatu Frontexa; zlasti zagotovi, da razpolaga Frontex z ustreznimi sredstvi za dosego svojih ciljev ter da Parlament obvešča o vsem, kar zadeva pogajanja o sporazumih na področju priseljevanja s tretjimi državami;
(e) present as soon as possible the pending legal instruments on other 'EU blue card' categories of third-country workers such as seasonal workers, intra-corporate transferees and remunerated trainees and on FRONTEX's mandate; in particular, ensure that FRONTEX has adequate resources in order to meet its objectives and to keep Parliament fully informed of the negotiations on agreements in the field of immigration with third countries;
(f) oblikuje evropsko politiko notranje varnosti, ki naj dopolnjuje nacionalne varnostne načrte, da bi si državljani Unije in nacionalni parlamenti lahko jasno predstavljali, kakšna je dodana vrednost ukrepov EU; še posebej naj okrepi politiko EU, ki zadeva boj proti nekaterim vrstam organiziranega kriminala, kot so trgovina z ljudmi, spolno izkoriščanje otrok in korupcija, s prejemanjem učinkovitih ukrepov in uporabo vseh razpoložljivih orodij za sodelovanje, da se dosežejo merljivi rezultati, tudi ukrepov za sprejetje zakonodajnega instrumenta o zaplembi finančnih sredstev in lastnine kriminalnih organizacij ter o tem, da jih je treba uporabiti v socialne namene;
(f) establish a European Internal Security Policy, which should complement national security plans so that citizens of the Union and national parliaments have a clear idea of the added value of EU action; in particular, reinforce EU policy regarding the fight against certain types of organised crime such as cybercrime, trafficking in human beings, sexual exploitation of children and corruption, by taking effective action and using all available cooperation tools to achieve measurable results, including action with a view to the adoption of a legislative instrument on the confiscation of financial assets and property of international criminal organisations and on their re-use for social purposes;