natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
želi imeti zgodnji vpogled v predlog za ustanovitev Evropskega javnega tožilstva (EPPO), kot predvideva člen 86 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije; želi biti vključen v razprave o ustanovitvi EPPO;
Wishes to have early sight of the proposal for the establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) as envisaged in Article 86 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; wishes to be involved in the discussions about the establishment of an EPPO;
od Komisije zahteva, da nujno izdela obljubljen in težko pričakovan „dokument o razmisleku“, in ponovno poudarja pomembnost zgoraj omenjenega stališča Parlamenta po prvi obravnavi z dne 20. novembra 2008 o tej temi; želi ponovno poudariti, da bi moral urad OLAF zaradi svoje moči v prihodnje ostati v okviru Komisije in obenem ohraniti svojo neodvisnost; poudarja svoje predloge glede delovnega mesta generalnega direktorata urada OLAF, kot je podan v stališču Parlamenta, in poziva, da se zelo hitro imenuje uspešnega kandidata; meni, da mora izbirni postopek potekati v medinstitucionalnem okviru, ki bo v celoti upošteval pravice Parlamenta;
Requires the Commission to come forward, as a matter of urgency, with its promised and long-awaited ‘reflection paper’, and reiterates the importance of Parliament's above-mentioned first-reading position of 20 November 2008 on the subject; wishes to re-emphasise that, for the future strength of OLAF, it should remain within the Commission whilst retaining its independence; stresses its proposals regarding the post of Director-General of OLAF, as contained in Parliament's position, and calls for the successful candidate to be appointed very quickly; takes the view that the selection procedure needs to be carried out in an interinstitutional framework which fully respects Parliament's prerogatives;
poudarja svoje mnenje, da mora postopek za imenovanje začasnega generalnega direktorja urada OLAF smiselno upoštevati pravila, ki jih vsebuje akt v zvezi s pravno podlago urada OLAF, in sicer člen 12 Uredbe (ES) št. 1073/1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. maja 1999 o preiskavah, ki jih izvaja Evropski urad za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) UL L 135, 31.5.1999, str.
Reaffirms its opinion that the procedure for the appointment of the interim Director General of OLAF must follow mutatis mutandis the rules contained in the act providing for OLAF's legal basis, namely Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) OJ L 135, 31.5.1999, p.
; obžaluje, kako Komisija v splošnem uporablja kadrovske predpise, in je zaskrbljen, da bi utegnil njen položaj vplivati na učinkovitost urada OLAF;
; deplores the Commission's general application of the Staff Regulations and is concerned that the Commission's position may affect OLAF´s effectiveness;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so bile po mnenju Računskega sodišča izjave držav članic o tradicionalnih lastnih sredstvih, ki so jih poslale Komisiji, na splošno zanesljive in brez pomembnih napak ter da so bila lastna sredstva iz DDV in BND pravilno izračunana, Komisija pa jih je pravilno izterjala in vnesla v računovodske izkaze Skupnosti;
Welcomes the fact that the Court considered that, overall, the Member States‘ statements regarding traditional own resources sent to the Commission were reliable and free from material error and also that the VAT– and GNI-based own resources were correctly calculated and correctly collected and entered in the Community accounts by the Commission;
je seznanjen in globoko zaskrbljen nad poročilom Komisije o statistiki javnofinančnega primanjkljaja in dolga Grčije ( KOM(2010)0001 ), ki poraja resne dvome glede zanesljivosti podatkov, ki so jih dostavile grške oblasti; poziva Komisijo, naj z lastnimi preiskavami ugotovi veljavnost podatkov, ki so bili dani na razpolago leta 2008, ter potrdi pravilnost in zakonitost izračunov in prispevka lastnih virov, danih na razpolago;
Takes note, with deep concern, of the Commission's report on the Greek government deficit and debt statistics ( COM(2010)0001 ), which raises serious doubts concerning the reliability of the data delivered by the Greek authorities; calls on the Commission to establish by its own investigations the validity of the data made available in 2008 and to confirm the regularity and legality of the calculation and contribution of the own resources made available;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi načrte o tem, kako namerava v prihodnje obravnavati operacije z grško upravo; poudarja, da mora biti osebje, udeleženo pri upravljanju evropskih sredstev, izvzeto iz ukrepov za zmanjšanje stroškov, da se zagotovi vzdrževanje in integriteta struktur upravljanja;
Asks the Commission to present its plans on the future handling of operations with the Greek administration; stresses that staff involved in the management of European funds must be excepted from cost-cutting measures in order to ensure the maintenance and integrity of the management structures;
kljub temu pa glede lastnih sredstev iz DDV opaža, da pridržki, ki izhajajo še iz leta 1989, še obstajajo in Komisijo poziva, da si v sodelovanju z državami članicami še naprej prizadeva zagotoviti umik pridržkov v razumnem časovnem okviru;
Notes however, regarding the VAT-based own resources, that reservations dating back as far as 1989 continue to exist, and calls on the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, to continue its efforts to ensure that reservations are lifted within reasonable timescales;
poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi z lastnimi sredstvi iz BND upošteva priporočilo, ki ga je v točki 4.36 svojega letnega poročila za 2008 dalo Računsko sodišče in naj Parlamentu sporoči podrobnosti glede napredka, doseženega pri uporabi neposrednega preverjanja in ocenjevanja nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov v nacionalnih statističnih institutih držav članic;
Asks the Commission, regarding GNI-based own resources, to follow the Court's recommendation in point 4.36 of its 2008 Annual Report and to communicate to Parliament details of the progress made in applying direct verification and assessing supervisory and control systems in Member States‘ national statistical institutes;
pozdravlja pozitivno oceno Računskega sodišča, ki je na podlagi svojega revizijskega dela ugotovilo, da v plačilih, razen za razvoj podeželja, za skupino politike kmetijstvo in naravni viri za leto, ki se je končalo 31. decembra 2008, ni bilo bistvenih napak; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je splošna stopnja napak za EU 27 pod 2-odstotnim pragom, ki ga dopušča Računsko sodišče;
Welcomes the positive assessment by the Court, based on its audit work, that, save as regards Rural Development, the payments for the year ended 31 December 2008 for the Agriculture and Natural Resources policy group were free from material error; is pleased to note that the average EU 27 error rate is below the 2 % threshold tolerated by the Court;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja izredno razširjenost stopnje napak na kraju samem med državami članicami pri izvajanju pomoči (Francija 0,20 %, Združeno Kraljestvo 0,24 %, Nemčija 0,3 %, Grčija 3,70 %, Romunija 12,57 %, Bolgarija približno 6 %) na površino in vztraja, da se ne sme ogroziti splošne verodostojnosti sistema; poziva k pravilno usmerjenim, takojšnjim ukrepom, ki bodo prinesli olajšanje administrativnih postopkov državam članicam, ki delujejo bolje, in učinkovite protiukrepe;
Notes with concern the extreme spread of on-the-spot error rates by Member State in the implementation of area aids (France 0.20 %, United Kingdom 0.24 %, Germany 0.3 %, Greece 3.70 %, Romania 12.57 %, Bulgaria approximately 6 %) and insists that the overall credibility of the system must not be jeopardised; calls for well directed, immediate measures resulting in both administrative relief for outperforming Member States and effective countermeasures;
obžaluje ugotovitve Računskega sodišča o odhodkih za razvoj podeželja, na katere še vedno vpliva visoka stopnja napak, čeprav je bila ocenjena stopnja napak nižja kot v prejšnjih letih;
Regrets the Court's finding concerning Rural Development expenditure, which is still affected by a high level of errors, although the estimated error level was lower than in previous years;
pozdravlja oceno Komisije glede kakovosti izjav in letnih povzetkov, ki so jih predložile države članice za odhodke za kmetijstvo, ki je zaključila, da je bila leta 2008 večina v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi in na splošno v skladu s smernicami Komisije;
Welcomes the evaluation made by the Commission concerning the quality of the statements and annual summaries presented by Member States for Agriculture expenditure, which concluded that, in 2008, the majority of them complied with their legal obligations and generally followed the Commission guidelines;
tako kot v prejšnjih letih poudarja, da je integrirani in administrativni kontrolni sistem na splošno učinkovit pri omejevanju tveganja za nepravilne odhodke, vendar kljub temu obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče našlo velike pomanjkljivosti v izbranih plačilnih agencijah v treh državah članicah: v Bolgariji, v Romuniji in v Združenem kraljestvu (Škotska) (točka 5.32 Letnega poročila za 2008); priznava pa, da so bili sprejeti ukrepi za odpravo teh pomanjkljivosti;
Reiterates, as in previous years, that the IACS is generally an effective control system for limiting the risk of error or irregular expenditure, but nevertheless regrets that the Court found significant weaknesses in selected paying agencies in three Member States: Bulgaria, Romania and the United Kingdom (Scotland) (point 5.32 of the 2008 Annual Report); acknowledges, however, that steps were taken to address these weaknesses;
poziva k poenostavitvi zapletenih pravil in k natančnejšim definicijam meril za upravičenost, zlasti za kmetijsko-okoljske programe, najprej na ravni Komisije, vendar tudi na nacionalni ravni, v zvezi z načrti za razvoja podeželja, ter obenem prosi, da bi vse zainteresirane strani dobile obsežnejša in jasnejša navodila in smernice ter da se organizira usposabljanje;
Calls for a simplification of complex rules and more precise definitions of eligibility criteria, especially for agri-environmental schemes, first of all at Commission level but also at national level, in the context of the rural development plans, and asks also for all stakeholders to be given more comprehensive and clearer instructions and guidelines, and for training actions to be organised;
obžaluje, da identifikacijski sistem za zemljišča, ki ga uporabljajo nacionalni organi, v nekaterih državah članicah še vedno ne deluje pravilno, saj Računsko sodišče poroča o velikih pomanjkljivostih v teh državah (v Bolgariji, Španiji, Poljski in Združenem kraljestvu); ugotavlja, da so bili na nacionalni ravni izvedeni različni ukrepi za reševanje pomanjkljivosti;
Regrets the fact that the Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) applied by national authorities is still not correct in some Member States in which substantial deficiencies were reported by the Court (in Bulgaria, Spain, Poland and the United Kingdom); notes that different measures have been taken at national level to address the deficiencies;
prav tako izraža skrb zaradi napak v povezavi z odhodki v okviru programa SAPARD v Bolgariji in Romuniji, zaradi katerih je Generalni direktorat za kmetijstvo v svojem letnem poročilu o dejavnostih izrazil pridržek; je seznanjen z akcijskimi načrti, že vpeljanimi kot odgovor na priporočila Komisije;
Also expresses its concern about the errors in respect of expenditure under the SAPARD Programme in Bulgaria and Romania, which caused the Directorate-General for Agriculture to make a reservation in its Annual Activity Report; notes the action plans already in place in response to the Commission's recommendations;
poudarja pomen hitrih in temeljitih naknadnih revizij, da se ugotovijo neupravičeni odhodki in/ali nezadostna podporna dokumentacija ter omogočijo potrebni popravki;
Emphasises the importance of prompt and thorough ex-post audits to detect ineligible expenditure and/or inadequate supporting documentation, in order to allow the necessary corrections to be made;
je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Računsko sodišče v zvezi s tem, kako države članice opredeljujejo, kaj je potrebno za ohranjanje zemljišč v dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojih (GAEC), tako da se nekaterim upravičencem izplačuje pomoč iz Sheme enotnega plačila (SEP) ali Sheme enotnega plačila na površino (SEPP), ne da bi kakor koli izkoriščali zadevna zemljišča (točka 5.49 Letnega poročila za 2008);
Is concerned by the shortcomings found by the Court concerning the Member States‘ definition of what is required to maintain land in good agricultural and environmental condition (’GAEC‘), such that certain beneficiaries are paid aid under SPS or SAPS without doing anything with the land concerned (point 5.49 of the 2008 Annual Report);
meni, da mora Komisija odpraviti te pomanjkljivosti, vključno z vprašanjem upravičencev, ki ne ustrezajo definiciji „kmetov“, kot je omenilo Računsko sodišče v Letnem poročilu 2008 , da bi od certifikacijskih organov dobili višjo stopnjo zagotovila;
Considers that these weaknesses, including the question of beneficiaries who do not meet the definition of ‘farmers’, as denounced by the Court in the 2008 Annual Report, should be resolved by the Commission in order to provide a greater level of assurance which can be gained from the work of the certification bodies;
je seznanjen z zaključki Računskega sodišča, zato poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša preglede v tistih državah članicah, ki pri dodeljevanju pravic izven določb uredb niso spoštovale zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Takes note of the conclusions of the Court and therefore urges the Commission to improve checks in those Member States which did not comply with Community legislation when allocating entitlements beyond the provisions of the regulations;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija omenila pomanjkljivosti v zvezi z računi dolžnikov za četrtino plačilnih agencij in predlagala finančne popravke v znesku približno 25,3 milijona EUR; poleg tega ugotavlja, da ti popravki pomenijo približno 1,95 % od 1,295 milijonov EUR, ki bi jih bilo treba izterjati do konca proračunskega leta 2008; poudarja, da čeprav so tik pod 2-odstotnim pragom pomembnosti, kažejo, da na skupni ravni računov dolžnikov obstaja tveganje resne napake;
Notes that the Commission raised shortcomings in respect of the debtors‘ accounts for one quarter of the paying agencies and has proposed financial corrections amounting to some EUR 25,3 million; further notes that these corrections represent some 1,95 % of the EUR 1 295 million that are to be recovered as at the end of financial year 2008; stresses that, whilst just below the 2 % level of materiality, they indicate that a risk of material error at the overall level of the debtors’ accounts exists;
prosi Komisijo, naj podrobno spremlja nadaljnje dogajanje in poskrbi za to, da dolgovi pravilno in ustrezno bremenijo proračun Skupnosti;
Asks the Commission to carry out a detailed follow-up to ensure that the debts are correct and properly charged to the Community budget;
ugotavlja, da vmesna plačila za obdobje 2007–2013, opravljena v letu 2008, obsegajo le 32 % odhodkov in da se opombe Računskega sodišča nanašajo zlasti na odhodke za programsko obdobje 2000–2006, ki so obsegali 68 % plačil iz naslova kohezijske politike v letu 2008; zato ugotavlja, da učinkov okrepitve pravnega okvira za obdobje 2007–2013 in ukrepov za poenostavitev, sprejetih v letih 2008 in 2009, še ni mogoče opaziti;
Notes that interim payments for the period 2007-2013 made in 2008 account for only 32 % of expenditure and that the comments of the Court of Auditors refer, in particular, to expenditure during the 2000-2006 programming period, which represented 68 % of cohesion payments in 2008; notes, therefore, that the effects of the reinforcement of the legal framework for the period 2007-2013 and the simplification measures adopted in 2008 and 2009 cannot be visible yet;
poudarja, da je absolutna prednostna naloga zmanjšati celotne stopnje napak, ki so na tem področju porabe v letu 2008 ostale visoke, ter izboljšati nadzor Komisije in sistem izterjav;
Stresses the absolute priority of further reducing global error rates, which remained high in this spending area in 2008, and of improving the Commission's supervision and the system of recoveries;
je zaskrbljen, ker napake na področju kohezijskih sredstev kažejo na to, da vsaj 11 % celotnega vrnjenega zneska ne bi smelo biti izplačanega, kar pomeni, da v primerjavi z letom 2007 ni izboljšav; obžaluje, da so finančni popravki in izterjave le delno funkcionalni; ugotavlja, da so bili za programsko obdobje 2000–2006 opravljeni naslednji popravki: Španija 1 535,07 milijonov EUR; Grčija 881,24 milijonov EUR; Italija 693,90 milijonov EUR; Francija 248,48 milijonov EUR; Združeno Kraljestvo 155,94 milijonov EUR; Portugalska 128,24 milijonov EUR; Poljska 88,99 milijonov EUR; Madžarska 40,62 milijonov EUR; Slovaška republika 39,16 milijonov EUR; Irska 25,55 milijonov EUR; Nemčija 19,33 milijonov EUR; Švedska 11,30 milijonov EUR;
Is concerned that errors in the area of Cohesion funding indicate that at least 11 % of the total amount reimbursed should not have been paid out, with no improvement on 2007; regrets that financial corrections and recoveries are only partly functional; notes that the following financial corrections have been made for the 2000-2006 programming period: Spain EUR 1 535,07 million; Greece EUR 881,24 million; Italy EUR 693,90 million; France EUR 248,48 million; United Kingdom EUR 155,94 million; Portugal EUR 128,24 million; Poland EUR 88,99 million; Hungary EUR 40,62 million; Slovak Republic EUR 39,16 million; Ireland EUR 25,55 million; Germany EUR 19,33 million; Sweden EUR 11,30 million;
z zaskrbljenostjo opaža težave, s katerimi se srečujejo oblasti držav članic glede prenosa regulativnih obveznosti za obdobje 2007–2013 (kot so vprašanja nezdružljivosti med ravnmi EU in nacionalnimi ravnmi, zamude pri ustvarjanju pravil, nejasna pravila) in tudi glede ustvarjanja sistemov upravljanja in kontrole (dodeljevanje nalog za nove ustanove, tj. organe za upravljanje, potrjevanje in revizijo);
Notes with concern the difficulties encountered by Member States‘ authorities as regards both the transposition of the 2007-2013 regulatory requirements (such as incompatibility issues between EU and national levels, delays in the establishment of the rules, unclear rules) and the establishment of the new management and control systems (allocation of tasks for the new institutions, i.e. the managing, certifying and audit authorities);
obžaluje dejstvo, da je sistem sankcij za države članice, ki so poročale visoke stopnje napak in prejele velik delež sredstev, neučinkovit, saj so vrnile le med 3 in 5 % vseh izterjav; je zaskrbljen, da strošek za vzdrževanje ustreznih kontrolnih sistemov očitno presega ta znesek, tako da je to negativna pobuda;
Deplores the fact that the system of sanctions for Member States returning high error rates and receiving large shares of funds is inefficient since they only repay between 3 % and 5 % of the overall appropriations in recoveries; is concerned that the cost of maintaining proper control systems manifestly exceeds this amount, so that this is a negative incentive;
ponovno poziva k nadaljnji poenostavitvi pravil, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, in obenem k uvedbi učinkovitejših kontrol na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU z namenom učinkovite porabe strukturnih in kohezijskih sredstev; meni, da je nujno potrebna objektivna ocena učinkov ukrepov za poenostavitev, ki so bili uvedeni v obdobju 2008 in 2009, ter poziva Komisijo, naj opravi to oceno do konca leta 2010;
Reiterates its call for further simplification of the rules proposed by the Commission and, at the same time, for the introduction of more efficient controls at national and EU level, with a view to effective implementation of the Structural and Cohesion Funds; takes the view that an objective assessment of the effects of the simplification measures introduced in 2008-2009 is essential, and calls on the Commission to carry out this assessment by the end of 2010;
upošteva zaskrbljenost Računskega sodišča glede težav pri zagotavljanju s preprostim letnim poročilom dokončne in nespremenljive slike dejanskega stanja, ki je spremenljivo in postopno se razvijajoče in odvisno od proračuna kohezijske politike ter vezano na večletni dinamični časovni načrt, pri katerem se končni odstotki napak in nepravilnosti s posledicami ter dejanski zneski, ki so odvisni od prejema, lahko preverijo šele v zelo pozni fazi (Komisija je pravkar zaključila obdobje 94–99); v zvezi s tem prosi Komisijo, naj poleg veljavnega akcijskega načrta skupaj z Računskim sodiščem pripravi predlog za rešitev težav, ki povzročajo odstopanje med večletnim proračunskim okvirom in sistemom letnega nadzora; ta predlog bi bil enako uporaben tudi za zagotavljanje učinkovitejšega spremljanja velikih evropskih projektov, kot je Galileo;
Takes note of the concern expressed by the Court of Auditors at the difficulties of taking a definitive and unchangeable snapshot, solely in the annual report, of the changing and progressive reality that is the Cohesion Policy budget, subject to a multiannual and dynamic schedule in which the final percentages of errors and irregularities with consequences, and the real amounts subject to recovery, can be verified only at a much later stage (the Commission has just closed the accounts for the 1994-1999 period); to that end calls on the Commission to present, in addition to the current Action Plan, a proposal in cooperation with the Court of Auditors for solving these phasing difficulties between the multiannual budgetary framework and the annual auditing system; considers that such a proposal would also be useful to ensure there is more efficient control of major European projects such as Galileo;
ugotavlja, da leta 2008 predložen akcijski načrt za krepitev nadzorne vloge Komisije v okviru deljenega upravljanju strukturnih ukrepov leta 2008 ni bil v celoti uresničen in ni odpravil glavnega problema, to je preveč zapletenih pravil, ki jih spremljajo izvedbene zahteve, ki se razlikujejo od države do države članice, včasih pa celo med različnimi regijami; od Komisije zahteva, naj pravočasno zagotovi prevod smernic za javne organe v državah članicah; poleg tega poudarja, da njegovega učinka, ni mogoče oceniti, saj napake, storjene v prejšnjih letih, še vedno vplivajo na povračilo odhodkov Komisije, kot je pravilno ugotovilo Računsko sodišče v točki 6.34 svojega Letnega poročila;
Notes that the action plan to strengthen the Commission's supervisory role under shared management of structural actions, presented in 2008, was not fully implemented in 2008 and would not have remedied the main problem, namely that of over-complex rules combined with implementation requirements which differ from one Member State to another and sometimes even between different regions; asks the Commission to provide for translation in due course of the guidelines for public authorities in the Member States; stresses moreover that its impact cannot be assessed as errors committed in previous years are still affecting the expenditure reimbursed by the Commission, as the Court has rightly pointed out in its Annual Report (point 6.34);