natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o boju proti terorizmu
European Parliament resolution on the fight against terrorism
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta, sprejetih v Bruslju 25. in 26. marca 2004, zlasti izjave Evropskega sveta s 25. marca 2004 o boju proti terorizmu, ki vključuje solidarnostno klavzulo,
having regard to the conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 25 and 26 March 2004, in particular the European Council Declaration of 25 March 2004 on combating terrorism, which included a solidarity clause,
ob upoštevanju poročila „Zavezništvo civilizacij“, ki je bilo predstavljeno generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov 13. novembra 2006,
having regard to the Report 'Alliance of Civilisations' presented to the UN Secretary-General on 13 November 2006,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije s 14. februarja 2007 o domnevni uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani obveščevalne agencije CIA Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2007)0032 . ,
having regard to its resolution of 14 February 2007 on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners Texts adopted, P6_TA(2007)0032 . ,
– je terorizem skupna grožnja varnosti državljanov EU in se mu je zato treba odločno upreti, obenem pa najstrožje spoštovati temeljne pravice,
– terrorism is a common threat to the safety of EU citizens and should therefore be firmly resisted, while the most scrupulous respect should, at the same time, be shown for fundamental rights,
– naj bi bila EU, skladno s členoma 2 in 6 pogodbe o EU, območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v skladu z načeli demokracije, pravne države in varstva temeljnih pravic, na katerih temelji EU, ter skladno s členom 29 te pogodbe, da je cilj Unije zagotoviti državljanom visoko stopnjo varstva, zlasti s preprečevanjem terorizma in bojem proti njemu,
– by virtue of Articles 2 and 6 of the EU Treaty, the EU should be an area of freedom, security and justice according with the principles underlying the EU of democracy, the rule of law and fundamental rights protection, and whereas by virtue of Article 29 of that Treaty 'the Union's objective shall be to provide citizens with a high level of safety', in particular by preventing and combating terrorism,
– EU namerava odločno oceniti dosežke, omejitve in nadaljnje možnosti protiteroristične politike Evropske unije po napadih 11. septembra 2001, 11. marca 2004 in 7. julija 2005 v času, ko je nevarnost terorizma dobila globalne razsežnosti in torej zahteva odzivanje na isti ravni,
– the EU firmly intends to assess the achievements, limits and prospects of the European Union's anti-terrorism policy after the attacks of 11 September 2001, 11 March 2004 and 7 July 2005, at a time when the terrorist threat has assumed a global dimension and so calls for a response at the same level,
– se Evropska unija zavezuje boju proti terorizmu v vseh njegovih razsežnostih, najsi ta izvira ali deluje znotraj ali zunaj njenih meja, pri čemer Unija deluje v mejah, ki so opredeljene s pravno državo in spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, in ker zlasti v boju proti terorizmu ne sme biti področij, kjer se temeljne pravice ne bi spoštovale,
– the European Union is committed to the fight against terrorism in all its dimensions, whether its origin or activities occur inside or beyond its borders, while acting within the limits defined by the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights, and whereas in the fight against terror in particular there must be no areas in which fundamental rights are not respected,
– vsakršno omejevanje temeljnih pravic in svoboščin zaradi boja proti terorizmu mora biti omejeno časovno in po obsegu, zakonsko določeno, pod popolnim demokratičnim in sodnim nadzorom ter potrebno in sorazmerno v demokratični družbi,
– any limitation to fundamental rights and freedoms for the fight against terrorism must be limited in time and scope, foreseen by the law, submitted to full democratic and judicial scrutiny, and be necessary and proportionate in a democratic society,
– terorizma ni mogoče izkoreniniti, lahko pa zmanjšamo nevarnost terorizma, tako da se lotimo odpravljanja njegovih vzrokov,
– terrorism cannot be eradicated, but we can reduce the threat of terrorism by tackling its causes,
obžaluje, da so evropske institucije kot odziv na izjemne pritiske, ki so bili posledica terorističnih napadov, sprejele predpise, o katerih Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti niso imeli možnosti dovolj podrobno razpravljati in so bili v nasprotju s pravico do pravičnega sojenja, varstva podatkov in dostopa do dokumentov evropskih institucij, povezanih z bojem proti terorizmu, Sodišče evropskih skupnosti pa jih je zaradi tega upravičeno razveljavilo,
regretting that the European Institutions responded to the exceptional pressures as a result of terrorist attacks, by adopting acts that have not been thoroughly discussed with the European and national parliaments and that have been in violation of the rights to a fair trail, to data protection or to access to documents of the European Institutions connected with the fight against terrorism, and as a consequence rightly have been annulled by the European Court of Justice,
ob posebnem upoštevanju žrtev terorizma in njihovih mučnih izkušenj in ker je potrebno prednostno podpreti njihove pravice in ukrepe, s katerimi bi jim zagotovili zaščito in priznanje, ob zavedanju, da začnejo teroristi izgubljati, kadar njihove žrtve spregovorijo, družba pa jim prisluhne,
having very particular regard for the victims of terrorism and their agonising experiences and for the need to give priority to upholding their rights and to measures seeking to afford them protection and recognition, bearing constantly in mind that the terrorists begin to lose ground when victims speak out and society gives them a hearing,
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi daljnosežnih posledic uporabe obsežnih baz podatkov o priseljevanju in azilu za namene boja proti terorizmu na evropski ravni, zlasti pa zaradi omogočanja dostopa do baze podatkov Eurodac policiji in organom pregona držav članic ter Europolu v okviru njihovih nalog preprečevanja odkrivanja in preiskovanja terorističnih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj, h kateremu pozivajo sklepi Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve iz junija 2007,
concerned about the far-reaching consequences of using large-scale immigration and asylum databases at the EU level in the fight against terrorism and in particular about giving access to the Eurodac database to Member States' police and law enforcement authorities as well as Europol in the course of their duties in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and other serious criminal offences as called for in the conclusions of the Justice and Home Affairs Council of June 2007,
se zato zaveda, da je boj proti terorizmu zelo večplastna zadeva in zdaj bolj kot kdajkoli prej zahteva večplastno in multidisciplinarno strategijo, kot na mednarodni ravni predvideva
conscious, therefore, that the fight against terrorism is a very complex matter and requires, now more than ever, a multi-level and multi-disciplinary strategy as foreseen at international level
– protiteroristična strategija ZN, sprejeta 8. septembra 2006 Glej http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.html , in Konvencija Sveta Evrope o preprečevanju terorizma, sprejeta maja 2005 Glej http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=196&amp;CM=2&amp;DF=&amp;CL=ENG ,
– by the UN Counter-Terrorism Strategy adopted on 8 September 2006 See http://www.un.org/terrorism/strategy-counter-terrorism.html and the European Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism of the Council of Europe concluded on May 2005 See http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=196&amp;CM=2&amp;DF=&amp;CL=ENG (already ratified by BG, DK, RO, SL, SK). ,
– Evropski svet, ki je decembra 2005 sprejel strategijo Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu Glej http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/05/st14/st14469-re04.en05.pdf , na žalost brez kakršnega koli sodelovanja Evropskega parlamenta ali nacionalnih parlamentov,
– by the European Council when it adopted a Counter-Terrorism Strategy See http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/05/st14/st14469-re04.en05.pdf in December 2005, unfortunately without any substantial involvement of the European and national Parliaments,
– Komisija, ki je predstavila svoj sveženj ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu 6. novembra 2007,
– and by the Commission which presented its counter-terrorism package on 6 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju, da vsak vidik evropske strategije – preprečevanje, zaščita, pregon, odzivanje – zahteva celovito udeležbo Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, ki bi jih bilo treba celovito in redno obveščati na podlagi ocen, ki jih Komisija opravi vsaki dve leti, ter jim omogočiti, da bodo lahko preverili, kakšen je bil dejanski učinek sprejetih ukrepov, vključno z vplivom na temeljne pravice, ali so bili uresničeni izhodiščni cilji in kakšni so bili dejanski stroški pobud,
considering that each one of the aspects of the European strategy – prevention, protection, pursuit, response – requires the full involvement of the European and national Parliaments, which should be fully and regularly informed through evaluations carried out by the Commission every two years and enabled to verify the real effectiveness impact of the measures taken, including the impact on fundamental rights, whether the initial objectives have been implemented and the real cost of the initiatives,
obžaluje, da prihaja do znatnega pomanjkanja preglednosti, demokratičnega nadzora, odgovornosti in pravnih sredstev, ter ugotavlja, da evropske institucije in agencije, kot sta Europol in Eurojust, šele začenjajo bolj strukturirano zbirati informacije, potrebne za svoje dejavnosti,
regretting that there is a substantial lack of transparency, democratic oversight, accountability and judicial review, and noting that the European Institutions and Agencies such as Europol and Eurojust are just starting to collect the information required for their activities in a more structured way,
izraža osuplost, ker nekatere evropske vlade in Svet niso hoteli odgovoriti na obtožbe o zlorabi pristojnosti pod pretvezo boja proti terorizmu, zlasti v primeru izrednih izročitev in tajnih lokacij CIE,
dismayed at the refusal of some European governments and the Council to answer to allegations of abuse of powers under the pretext of counter-terrorism, in particular in the case of CIA extraordinary renditions and black sites,
meni, da je treba čezmejno sodelovanje obveščevalnih in varnostnih služb temeljiteje in bolj sistematično nadzirati,
taking the view that cross-border cooperation of intelligence and security services must be subject to more thorough and systematic scrutiny,
je globoko zaskrbljen zaradi zlorabe in spremembe namembnosti številnih ukrepov, ki so bili uvedeni pod oznako boja proti terorizmu, a se v praksi uporabljajo za vrsto drugih namenov,
deeply concerned at the function creep of many measures introduced under the counter-terrorism label, but which in practice are used for a wide range of purposes,
poudarja, da je treba v evropski strategiji boja proti terorizmu nameniti bistveno večjo pozornost vzrokom terorizma in vlogi Evropske unije pri tem,
emphasising the need to pay considerably more attention in the European counter-terrorism strategy to the causes of terrorism and the EU’s role therein,
opozarja, da bi reforma pogodb omogočila določitev preglednega, enostavnejšega in odgovornejšega okvira za vlogo Evropske unije v boju proti terorizmu, krepitev solidarnosti držav članic ter vključitev Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v ocenjevanje politik, povezanih z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, hkrati obžaluje, da pri teh politikah na evropski ravni ne bo celovitega sodnega nadzora za zakonodajo, sprejeto pred začetkom veljavnosti pogodbe o reformi,
recalling that the reform of the Treaties should make it possible to frame in a transparent , more simplified and accountable way also the European Union’s role in the fight against terrorism , strengthen the solidarity of the Member States and associate the European and national Parliaments in the evaluation of FSJA related policies, whilst regretting that for these policies there will be no full judicial control at European level for legislation adopted prior to the Reform Treaty’s entry into force,
toplo pozdravlja sprejetje nove reformne pogodbe in poziva države članice, naj jo ratificirajo, da bo postala Listina o temeljnih pravicah zavezujoča, kar je nujna dopolnitev evropske strategije boja proti terorizmu,
warmly welcomes the adoption of the new Reform Treaty and calls on the Member States to ratify it so as to make binding the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is a necessary complement to the European strategy for combating terrorism,
meni, da bi morala Evropska unija podpirati dejavnosti, katerih cilj je preprečevati nasilno radikalizacijo, na evropski, nacionalni in lokalni ravni, s pospeševanjem integracije ljudi prek medkulturnega dialoga ter spodbujanjem demokracije in človekovih pravic kot univerzalnih vrednot, na katerih temelji naša družba, s čimer bi se izognili političnemu izključevanju; meni tudi, da se je potrebno boriti proti nasilni radikalizaciji, tudi proti spodbujanju k nasilnim dejanjem;
Considers that the EU should support actions at European, national and local level aimed at preventing violent radicalisation, by fostering the integration of people through intercultural dialogue and the promotion of democracy and human rights as the universal values underpinning our society, avoiding political exclusion; also considers it necessary to fight against violent radicalisation, including incitement to commit violent actions;
meni tudi, da je pomemben element pri preprečevanju terorizma politika razvojne pomoči Evropske unije in držav članic, ki deluje tudi kot varnostna politika; meni, da sta spodbujanje civilne družbe in pomoč pri doseganju socialnega miru in blaginje primerna načina, kako ljudem predstaviti možnosti, ki jih imajo na voljo, ter omejiti širjenje skrajnih ideologij, zato meni, da je treba v državah, iz katerih po ugotovitvah izvira teroristična dejavnost, v okviru razvojne pomoči veliko večjo prednost kot doslej nameniti razvoju izobraževalnega in zdravstvenega sistema ter sistema socialne varnosti;
Believes, further, that an important element in preventing terrorism is a European Union and Member State development aid policy that also functions as a security policy; considers that promoting civil society and helping to achieve social peace and prosperity are a suitable means of showing people their opportunities and restricting the spread of fundamentalist ideologies; believes, therefore, that the development of education, health and social security systems in countries often identified as the origin of terrorist activities should be made a much greater priority than before in development aid policy;
v zvezi s tem meni, da bi morala biti Evropska unija naklonjena najboljšim praksam in njihovemu širjenju v EU, ter ugotavlja, da bo Evropski parlament v kratkem podal priporočila na tem področju, pri čemer bo upošteval prispevek Sveta in Komisije;
Deems, in this respect, that the European Union should favour best practices and their dissemination within the EU, and notes that Parliament will shortly be making recommendations in this area while taking of account the contributions of the Council and the Commission;
meni, da primeri, kot je nedavni, ko je vrhovno sodišče ZDA zavrnilo obravnavo pritožbe Khalida-Al Masrija, lahko zlasti pri muslimanskih manjšinah v Evropi okrepijo vtis, da se s protiterorističnimi ukrepi širijo dvojna merila; zato poziva Evropsko unijo, naj bolj prepričljivo sodeluje pri prizadevanjih v podporo pravne države v mednarodnem kontekstu, zlasti tako, da brani svoje državljane v pravnih postopkih v tretjih državah, ki zadevajo nesorazmerno veliko državljanov muslimanskega porekla;
Believes that cases such as the US Supreme Court's refusal to deal with the Khalid Al-Masri complaint tend to reinforce the impression, particularly among Muslim minorities in Europe, that anti-terror measures promulgate double standards; calls, therefore, on the European Union to engage more forcefully in the struggle to uphold the rule of law within the EU and in the international context, in particular by defending its own citizens in the legal prosecutions in third countries of which citizens of Muslim descent are over-proportionally concerned;
meni, da preprečevanje terorizma zahteva takšno zunanjo politiko EU, ki bo spodbujala demokracijo, načela pravne države in spoštovanje človekovih pravic v naši soseščini in drugje;
Considers that the prevention of terrorism requires an EU foreign policy that promotes democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights both in our neighbourhood and beyond;
ponovno poudarja pomen policije in pravosodnega sodelovanja na ravni EU, zlasti glede izmenjave podatkov in analiz, ter poziva države članice, naj ob usklajevanju in podpori Europola okrepijo medsebojno sodelovanje;
Reaffirms the importance of police and judicial cooperation at EU level, especially as far as exchanges of information and analysis are concerned, and calls on Member States to reinforce their cooperation with the coordination and support of Europol;
meni, da bi morale Komisija in države članice za povečanje svoje učinkovitosti v boju proti terorizmu vzpostaviti stalno omrežje za izmenjavo podatkov med evropskimi protiterorističnimi centri;
Considers that, in order to increase our effectiveness in the fight against terrorism, the Commission and the Member States should put in place a permanent network of information exchange between European anti-terrorist centres;
ponovno poudarja pomen skupne uporabe obveščevalnih podatkov na ravni EU, pa tudi med službami držav članic, in ponovno opozarja, da so potrebna enotna pravila na ravni EU, da se zagotovi potrebni demokratični in parlamentarni nadzor in pregled;
Reiterates the importance of sharing intelligence information, both at EU level and among Member States' services, and reaffirms the need for uniform rules at EU level to ensure the necessary democratic and parliamentary control and scrutiny;
Kar zadeva „zaščito“:
As far as 'protection' is concerned:
ponovno opozarja na pomen sodelovanja s tretjimi državami pri preprečevanju in zatiranju terorizma in poudarja, da so ZDA na tem področju nepogrešljiva partnerica; meni, da bi morale EU in ZDA z mednarodnim sporazumom določiti skupni pravni okvir za policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje in varstvo temeljnih pravic, zlasti osebnih podatkov, ki bi zagotavljal ustrezen demokratični in parlamentarni pregled na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU;
Reaffirms the importance of cooperation with third countries in the prevention of and fight against terrorism, and highlights that the US is an essential partner in this field; considers that a common legal framework for police and judicial cooperation and the protection of fundamental rights, especially of personal data, should be defined between the EU and the US, via an international agreement, ensuring appropriate democratic and parliamentary scrutiny at national and EU level;
meni, da je „za zaščito državljanov, temeljnih pravic, človekovih pravic, demokracije in infrastrukture ter zmanjšanje ranljivosti Evropske unije za napade, vključno z večjo varnostjo meja, prometa in kritične infrastrukture“, bistvenega pomena, da EU:
Considers that, in order 'to protect citizens, fundamental rights, human rights, democracy, and infrastructure and reduce EU vulnerability to attack, including through improved security of borders, transport and critical infrastructure', it is essential that the EU:
(a) v sodelovanju z državami članicami na vseevropski ravni oblikuje:
(a) establish, with the cooperation of the Member States, a Europe-wide
učinkovit solidarnostni mehanizem med državami članicami, ki omogoči takojšnji dostop do redkih virov, s katerimi razpolaga država (tako imenovana posebna sredstva, kot so cepiva ali napredne tehnologije),
– effective solidarity mechanism between Member States which can give immediate access to rare resources available at national level (so-called 'assets' such as vaccines or sophisticated technologies);
poudarja, da kakršno koli spremljanje interneta, ki ima za cilj preprečevanje terorističnih napadov, nikakor ne sme vključevati omejevanja svobodnega izražanja, katerega namen ni hujskanje k terorističnim dejanjem in ki samo po sebi gotovo ne more voditi k takim dejanjem;
Emphasises that any monitoring of the internet in order to prevent terrorist attacks should under no circumstances include restrictions to free speech that is not intended to incite terrorist acts and cannot reasonably in itself lead to such actions;
opozarja Svet na njegove obljube Evropskemu parlamentu in ga poziva, naj končno sprejme okvirni sklep o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, ter okvirni sklep o nekaterih postopkovnih pravicah v kazenskih postopkih na vsem območju Evropske unije, preden uvede druge ukrepe v zvezi z zatiranjem terorizma;
Reminds the Council of its promises to Parliament, and calls on it finally to adopt the framework decision on protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters providing for an adequate level of data protection and the framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union before introducing any further measures relating to the fight against terrorism;
opozarja, da je glavni namen Eurodaca kot podatkovne baze prvega stebra olajšati uporabo uredbe Dublin II pri določanju države članice, odgovorne za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, in da je malo verjetno, da bi bil kateri koli predlog o spremembi te uredbe v varnostni ukrep in orodje za preiskovanje kaznivih dejanj po pravu EU in mednarodnem pravu zakonit;
Recalls that the primary purpose of Eurodac as a first pillar database is to facilitate the application of the Dublin II Regulation to establish the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application, and that any proposal to transform it into a security measure and criminal investigation tool would be unlikely to be legal under EU and international law;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bi dostop organov pregona in Europola do podatkovne baze Eurodac lahko vodil v stigmatizacijo, diskriminacijo in potencialno ogroženost iskalcev azila ;
Notes with concern that access by law enforcement authorities and Europol to the Eurodac database could lead to stigmatisation of, discrimination against and possible danger to asylum seekers;
meni, da je vsaka oblika „profiliranja“ v okviru protiterorističnih ukrepov nesprejemljiva; meni, da niso sprejemljiva prizadevanja za sistem podatkov o letalskih potnikih EU brez popolnega ovrednotenja sporazumov o podatkih o letalskih potnikih med EU in ZDA ter med EU in Kanado, zlasti njihovega vpliva na zmanjšanje nevarnosti in izboljšanje varnosti ter na zasebnost in državljanske svoboščine;
Considers that any form of 'profiling' in counter-terrorism measures is unacceptable; regards it as unacceptable to pursue an EU PNR system without a complete evaluation of the EU-US and EU-Canada PNR agreement, in particular their impact on reducing the threat and increasing security as well as the impact on privacy and civil liberties;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker bi se z dostopom organov pregona in Europola do podatkovne baze Eurodac lahko zmanjšala učinkovitost, ki je bila osnovni namen podatkovne baze Eurodac;
Expresses concern that access by law enforcement authorities and Europol to the Eurodac database could diminish the efficiency of the principal purpose of the Eurodac database;
Kar zadeva „pregon“:
As far as 'pursuit' is concerned: