natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Če je bil med inšpekcijskim pregledom ugotovljen pomemben primer neskladnosti s to direktivo, se dodatni obisk na kraju samem izvede v šestih mesecih.
If an inspection has identified an important case of non-compliance with this Directive, an additional site visit shall be carried out within six months.
Obdobje med dvema obiskoma na kraju samem ni daljše od enega leta za organizacije višje stopnje in daljše od treh let za organizacije nižje stopnje , razen če pristojni organ izdela inšpekcijski program na podlagi sistematične ocene nevarnosti večjih nesreč za zadevne organizacije .
The period between two site visits shall not exceed one year for upper-tier establishments and three years for lower-tier establishments , unless the competent authority has drawn up an inspection programme based on a systematic appraisal of major-accident hazards of the establishments concerned .
Če je bil med inšpekcijskim pregledom ugotovljen pomemben primer neskladnosti s to direktivo, se v šestih mesecih izvede dodaten obisk na kraju samem .
If an inspection has identified an important case of non-compliance with this Directive, an additional site visit shall be carried out within six months.
Uvajanje strožje zakonodaje iz predloga Komisije je z vidika varnostne tehnologije neupravičeno.
This tightening of legislation in the Commission proposal is unjustified in terms of safety technology.
Obstoječi sistem, ki upošteva inšpekcijske programe, se je izkazal za dobrega in oblastem zagotavlja potrebno prožnost za inšpekcijski program, usmerjen v tveganje.
The existing system, which takes into account the inspection programme, has proven its worth and provides authorities with the necessary flexibility of a risk-oriented inspection programme.
Predlagana sprememba bi pomenila dodatno breme za upravljavce in oblasti ter dodatne stroške, ne da bi pridobili pri varnosti.
The proposed amendment would burden operators and authorities with extra costs without gain in safety.
Člen 19 – odstavek 5 – pododstavek 1 – točka c
Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point c
(c) sodelovanje upravljavca v sistemu Unije za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
(c) participation of the operator in the Union eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
(c) sodelovanje upravljavca v sistemu Unije za okoljsko ravnanje in presojo (EMAS) v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1221/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta ali v sistemu za okoljsko ravnanje, ki je priznan kot enakovreden .
(c) participation of the operator in the Union eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council or in a recognised equivalent environmental management system .
Omogočiti je treba uporabo drugih priznanih sistemov za okoljsko ravnanje, ne le sistema EMAS, na primer sistemov ISO, ki jih zelo pogosto uporabljajo mednarodne korporacije.
Recognised environmental management systems other than EMAS should also be an option, for example the ISO systems, which are very often employed by multinational corporations.
Ta zahteva je v skladu s točko (a) Priloge III k temu predlogu direktive.
This is consistent with point a) of Annex III to this proposal for a directive.
Člen 19 – odstavek 8
Article 19 – paragraph 8
Inšpekcijski pregledi se , kadar je to mogoče, uskladijo z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Unije in se , kadar je to ustrezno, med seboj kombinirajo.
Inspections shall whenever possible be coordinated with inspections under other Union legislation and combined, where appropriate .
Inšpekcijski pregledi se uskladijo z inšpekcijskimi pregledi v skladu z drugo zakonodajo Unije , zlasti z Direktivo 2010/75/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o industrijskih emisijah (celovito preprečevanje in nadzorovanje onesnaževanja) 1 in se med seboj kolikor mogoče kombinirajo.
Inspections shall be coordinated with inspections under other Union legislation , in particular Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) 1 , and , to the extent possible, combined.
Člen 19 – odstavek 8 a (novo)
Article 19 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Kjer so v uporabi nadzorni sistemi na podlagi najboljše razpoložljive tehnologije, je mogoče inšpekcijske preglede usklajevati z razpoložljivimi podatki in jih s tem poenostaviti.
Where best available technology control systems are in place, inspections can be coordinated with the available data to facilitate the inspections.
Člen 19 osnutka direktive je namenjen okrepitvi meril za inšpekcijske preglede industrijskih obratov.
Article 19 of the draft Directive is geared towards strengthening the inspection criteria of industrial plants.
Inšpekcijske preglede in rezultate, pridobljene v zadevnih obratih, bi bil lahko optimalizirali z uporabo najboljše informacijske in komunikacijske opreme za spremljanje in nadzor.
Making use of best available ICT monitoring and control equipment could be a way to optimise the inspections and the results obtained on the plants in question .
Komisija da zbirke podatkov iz odstavkov 3 in 5 na voljo javnosti.
The Commission shall make the databases referred to in paragraphs 3 and 5 available to the public.
V skladu s členom 21 da Komisija zbirke podatkov iz odstavkov 3 in 5 na voljo javnosti.
Subject to Article 21, the Commission shall make the databases referred to in paragraphs 3 and 5 available to the public.
Pojasniti je treba, da je obveznost objave iz odstavka 7 člena 20 tudi v skladu z načeli direktive o okoljskih informacijah.
It should be clarified that the publication obligations as written in Article 20, Paragraph 7 is also subject to the principles of the Environmental Information Directive
Komisija vsake štiri leta na podlagi informacij, ki jih države članice posredujejo v skladu s členom 16, ter informacij iz zbirk podatkov iz odstavkov 3 in 5 člena 20 poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o večjih nesrečah, ki so se zgodile na ozemlju Unije, ter njihovih morebitnih posledicah za učinkovito delovanje te direktive.
Every four years the Commission, on the basis of information submitted by Member States in accordance with Article 16 and of information held in databases, as referred to in Article 20(3) and (5), shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the major accidents that have occurred within the Union and their potential impact upon the efficient functioning of this Directive.
Poročilo pripravi tudi v primeru nesreče, ki velja za izjemno resno v smislu števila žrtev ali večje škode za okolje, da se prepreči morebitna nova škoda.
However, following any accident considered as extremely serious in terms of number of victims or major damage to the environment, a report shall be drawn up with the aim of preventing possible new damage.
Evropski parlament in Svet morata biti redno obveščena o večjih nesrečah, ki se zgodijo na ozemlju Evropske unije.
The European Parliament and the Council should regularly receive information on major accidents that have occurred within the European Union.
V tem trenutku ni obveznosti rednega poročanja Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Currently, there is no obligation to report to the European Parliament and the Council on a regular basis.
Člen 21 – naslov
Article 21 - title
Zahteve po informacijah , ki jih prejmejo pristojni organi v skladu s to direktivo , se lahko zavrnejo, če so izpolnjeni pogoji iz člena 4(2) Direktive 2003/4/ES .
Requests for information obtained by the competent authorities under this Directive may be refused where the conditions down in Article 4(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC are fulfilled.
Dostop do informacij , ki jih prejmejo pristojni organi v skladu s to direktivo , se ureja v skladu z Direktivo 2003/4/ES .
Access to information granted by the competent authorities under this Directive shall be handled in accordance with Directive 2003/4/EC.
Dostop do popolnih informacij iz člena 13(2)(b) in (c), ki jih prejmejo pristojni organi, se lahko zavrne, če upravljavec zahteva, da se nekateri deli varnostnega poročila ali seznam nevarnih snovi zaradi razlogov iz točk (b), (d), (e) ali (f) člena 4(2) Direktive 2003/4/ES ne razkrije .
Access to the complete information referred to in Article 13(2)(b) and (c) obtained by the competent authorities may be refused if the operator has requested not to disclose certain parts of the safety report or the inventory of dangerous substances for the reasons provided for in points (b), (d), (e) or (f) of Article 4(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC .
Če upravljavec zahteva, da se nekateri deli varnostnega poročila ali seznam nevarnih snovi ne razkrijejo, smejo pristojni organi v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2003/4/ES zavrniti dostop .
If the operator has requested not to disclose certain parts of the safety report or the inventory of dangerous substances the competent authorities may refuse access in accordance with Article 4 of Directive 2003/4/EC .
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko predstavniki zadevne javnosti v skladu s členom 6 Direktive 2003/4/ES zahtevajo pregled dejanj ali opustitev pristojnega organa v zvezi s katero koli zahtevo po informacijah v skladu s členom 13 ali členom 21(1) te direktive .
Member States shall ensure that, members of the public concerned are able to seek a review in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2003/4/EC of the acts or omissions of a competent authority in relation to any request for information pursuant to Article 13 or Article 21(1) of this Directive.
Države članice v skladu z ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo zagotovijo predstavnikom zadevne javnosti dostop do revizijskega postopka pred sodiščem ali drugim neodvisnim in nepristranskim organom, ki je določen z zakonom, da izpodbijajo materialno in postopkovno zakonitost odločitev, dejanj ali opustitev v zvezi z zadevami v skladu s členom 14, če:
Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions relating to cases subject to Article 14 where:
Države članice zagotovijo, da lahko predstavniki zadevne javnosti v skladu s členom 6 Direktive 2003/4/ES zahtevajo pregled dejanj ali opustitev pristojnega organa v zvezi s katero koli zahtevo po informacijah v skladu s to direktivo .
Member States shall ensure that, members of the public concerned are able to seek a review in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2003/4/EC of the acts or omissions of a competent authority in relation to any request for information pursuant to this Directive.
Države članice v skladu z ustrezno nacionalno zakonodajo zagotovijo predstavnikom zadevne javnosti dostop do revizijskega postopka pred sodiščem ali drugim neodvisnim in nepristranskim organom, ki je določen z zakonom, da izpodbijajo materialno in postopkovno zakonitost odločitev, dejanj ali opustitev v zvezi z zadevami v skladu z določbami te direktive , če:
Member States shall ensure that, in accordance with the relevant national legal system, members of the public concerned have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of decisions, acts or omissions relating to cases subject to the provisions of this Directive where:
V skladu z Aarhuško konvencijo o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah ima javnost dostop do pravnega varstva in pravnega pregleda postopkovne in materialne zakonitosti dejanj in opustitev fizičnih oseb ali javnih organov.
In line with the Aarhus convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, the public shall be able to have access to justice and legally review procedural and substantive legality of acts and omissions by private persons or public authorities.
Javnost naj bi tako imela tudi dostop do pravnega varstva v zvezi z drugimi zahtevami, kot so splošne obveznosti upravljavcev, inšpekcijski pregledi in varnostna poročila.
Access to justice with regard to other requirements such as general obligations of the operators, inspections and safety reports should therefore also be possible for the public.
Države članice v skladu s ciljem omogočanja dostopa zadevne javnosti do sodišč določijo, kaj pomeni zadosten interes in kršitev pravice.
What constitutes a sufficient interest and impairment of a right shall be determined by the Member States, consistently with the objective of giving the public concerned wide access to justice.
Zato se šteje, da za namen odstavka 2(a) zadošča interes katere koli nevladne organizacije, ki spodbuja varstvo okolja in izpolnjuje vse zahteve nacionalne zakonodaje.
To this end, the interest of any non-governmental organisation promoting environmental protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of paragraph 2(a) .
Zato se šteje, da za namen točke a prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 zadošča interes katere koli nevladne organizacije, ki spodbuja varstvo okolja ali javnega zdravja in izpolnjuje vse zahteve nacionalne zakonodaje.
To this end, the interest of any non-governmental organisation promoting environmental or public health protection and meeting any requirements under national law shall be deemed sufficient for the purpose of point (a) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 .
Za organizacije iz prvega pododstavka tudi velja, da imajo pravice, ki so lahko kršene za namen odstavka 2(b) .
The organisations referred to in the first subparagraph shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purpose of paragraph 2(b) .
Za organizacije iz prvega pododstavka tudi velja, da imajo pravice, ki so lahko kršene za namen točke b prvega pododstavka odstavka 1 .
The organisations referred to in the first subparagraph shall also be deemed to have rights capable of being impaired for the purpose of point (b) of the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 .
Pododstavka bi bilo treba natančno označiti: 1(a) in 1(b).
The subparagraphs should refer to paragraph 1(a) and 1(b).
Člen 23 – odstavek 1
Article 23– paragraph 1
Brez poseganja v člen 4 Komisija zaradi prilagoditve prilog I do VII tehničnemu napredku sprejme delegirane akte v skladu s členom 24.
Without prejudice to Article 4, in order to adapt Annexes I to VII to technical progress, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24.
Brez poseganja v člen 4 Komisija zaradi prilagoditve dela 3 Priloge I in prilog II do VI tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku sprejme delegirane akte v skladu s členom 24 in odstavkom 2 člena 17 .
Without prejudice to Article 4, in order to adapt Part 3 of Annex I and Annexes II to VI to technical and scientific progress, the Commission shall adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 and Article 17(2 )
Komisija v šestih mesecih po sprejetju prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku, kot je določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008, oceni, ali je treba prilagoditi Prilogo I, pri čemer upošteva možnost velikih nesreč, povezanih z neko snovjo, ter merila, sprejeta za namene uporabe člena 4.
Within six months of an adaptation to technical progress being adopted as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, the Commission shall assess whether Annex I needs to be adapted, taking into account the potential for major accidents linked to a substance and the criteria adopted for the purposes of applying Article 4.
Prilagajanje področja uporabe direktive Seveso Uredbi (ES) št. 1272/2008 (CLP) mora postati reden postopek, kar nakazuje že narava te uredbe.
Adapting the scope of the Seveso Directive to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) needs to become an ongoing process, as CLP by its very nature indicates.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov se na Komisijo prenese pod pogoji iz tega člena
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in this Article
Pooblastila za sprejetje delegiranih aktov iz členov 4 in 23 se za nedoločen čas podelijo Komisiji .
The powers to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Articles 4 and 23 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time.
Komisiji se od* za nedoločen čas podeli pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz členov 4 in 23.
The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 4 and 23 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period of time from * .
Prenos pooblastila iz členov 4 in 23 lahko Evropski parlament ali Svet kadar koli prekliče.
The delegation of power referred to in Articles 4 and 23 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Sklep začne veljati dan po objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ali na dan, ki je v njem določen.
It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein.
Pri podelitvi pooblastila za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov Komisiji veljajo pogoji iz členov 25 in 26.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 25 and 26.
Delegirani akt, sprejet na podlagi členov 4 in 23, začne veljati le, če mu Evropski parlament ali Svet v dveh mesecih od uradnega obvestila o tem aktu, ne nasprotuje ali če sta pred iztekom tega roka oba obvestila Komisijo, da mu ne bosta nasprotovala.
A delegated act adopted pursuant to Articles 4 and 23 shall enter into force only if no objection has been expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of two months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object.
* UL: prosimo, vstavite datum začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
* OJ: please enter the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Evropski parlament ali Svet lahko kadar koli prekliče podelitev pooblastil iz člena 24.
The delegation of powers referred to in Article 24 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu pooblastila, si o tem prizadeva obvestiti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem obdobju pred sprejetjem končne odločitve, pri čemer navede pooblastilo, ki bi lahko bilo preklicano, ter razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke the delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, stating the delegated powers which could be subject to revocation and the reasons for a revocation.
S sklepom o preklicu prenehajo veljati pooblastila iz navedenega sklepa.
The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the powers specified in that decision.
Če do konca navedenega obdobja Evropski parlament in Svet ne nasprotujeta delegiranemu aktu, se ta objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati na dan, določen v delegiranem aktu.
If, on expiry of that period, neither the European Parliament nor the Council has objected to the delegated act it shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force at the date stated therein.
Delegirani akt se lahko objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije in začne veljati pred koncem tega obdobja, če sta Evropski parlament in Svet obvestila Komisijo, da mu ne nameravata nasprotovati.
The delegated act may be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and enter into force before the expiry of that period if the European parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission of their intention not to raise objections.
Komisija do 1. junija 2013 preuči, ali bi moralo biti v področje uporabe te direktive zajeto tudi raziskovanje in izkoriščanje mineralov in ogljikovodikov na morju, in po potrebi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
By 1 June 2013, the Commission shall examine whether offshore exploration and exploitation of minerals, including hydrocarbons, should be included in the scope of this Directive and, if appropriate, present to a legislative proposal to this effect to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija do 1. junija 2015 preuči, ali bi moralo biti v področje uporabe te direktive zajet tudi transport nevarnih snovi po vodih, ključno s črpalnimi postajami, in po potrebi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
By 1 June 2015, the Commission shall examine whether transport of dangerous substances in pipelines, including pumping stations, should be included in the scope of this Directive and, if appropriate, present a legislative proposal to this effect to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija do 1. junija 2015 preuči, ali bi bilo treba v Prilogo I dodati snovi, ki izpolnjujejo merila za uvrstitev v kategorijo rakotvornih, mutagenih ali strupenih za razmnoževanje 1A ali 1B v skladu z Uredbo št. 1272/2008, in zmesi, ki vsebujejo te snovi, in po potrebi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
By 1 June 2015, the Commission shall examine whether further substances meeting the criteria for classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction category 1A or 1B pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, mixtures containing such substances, and certain nanomaterials should be added to Annex I, and, if appropriate, present a legislative proposal to this effect to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija do 1. junija 2015 preuči, ali bi bilo treba v Prilogo I dodati snovi, ki izpolnjujejo merila za uvrstitev v kategorijo obstojnih snovi, ki se kopičijo v organizmih in so strupene oziroma ki so ali zelo obstojne ali se zelo lahko kopičijo v organizmih v skladu z merili iz Priloge XIII Uredbe št. 1907/2007, in po potrebi Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predstavi ustrezen zakonodajni predlog.
By 1 June 2015, the Commission shall examine whether any s ubstances meeting the criteria for classification as persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic, or as very persistent or very bioaccumulative in accordance with the criteria set out in Annex XIII of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2007 should be added to Annex I, and if appropriate, present a legislative proposal to this effect to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Komisija do 1. junija 2020 in zatem vsaka tri leta Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu posreduje poročilo o izvajanju te direktive na podlagi informacij iz člena 20.
By 1 June 2020, and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and to the Council a report reviewing the implementation of this Directive on the basis of the information referred to in Article 20.
Poročilo po potrebi spremlja zakonodajni predlog.
That report shall be accompanied by a legislative proposal where appropriate.
Priloga I – del 2 – tabela – nove vrstice za vrstico 37
Annex I – Part 2 – Table – new rows after row 37
Te snovi so bile vključene v direktivo Seveso II s predlaganimi količinami, sprejetje uredbe CLP pa tega ne bi smelo spremeniti.
These substances were included within the Seveso-II-Directive with the proposed quantities and should not be cancelled by the adaption of the CLP-Regulation.
Priloga I – del 2 – tabela – vrstica 37 a (novo)
Annex I – Part 2 – Table – row 37 a (new)
raztopina natrijevega hipoklorita, ... % aktivnega klora
Sodium hypochlorite, solution …% Cl active
Glede zmesi, ki vsebujejo natrijev hipoklorit, predlog Komisije ne odraža v zadostni meri sprememb v razvrstitvi v Uredbi (ES) št°1272/2008 (CLP).
The classification changes in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) concerning mixtures containing sodium hypochlorite are not adequately reflected in the Commission proposal.