natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Države članice ne smejo zavrniti predložitve informacij o gospodarskem subjektu le zato, ker ima te informacije banka ali druga finančna institucija, pooblaščeni zastopnik ali oseba, ki deluje v agenciji ali kot zastopnik, ali ker se nanašajo na lastniško udeležbo pravne osebe.
Member States may not refuse to supply information on a economic operator on the sole grounds that this information is held by a bank or other financial institution, by a nominee or a person acting as agent or fiduciary or because it relates to the ownership interests in a legal person.
(4) Predložitev informacij se lahko zavrne, če bi to dokazano povzročilo razkritje poslovne, industrijske ali poklicne skrivnosti ali poslovnega procesa ali bi bilo razkritje zadevnih informacij v nasprotju z javnim redom.
(4) The provision of information may be refused where it would demonstrably lead to the disclosure of a commercial, industrial or professional secret or of a commercial process, or where its disclosure would be contrary to public policy.
Pristojni organ države članice, ki zagotovi informacije, dovoli uporabo informacij za druge namene v državi članici organa prosilca, če se lahko v skladu z zakonodajo države članice zaprošenega organa informacije uporabljajo za podobne namene.
However, the competent authority of the Member State providing the information shall permit its use for other purposes in the Member State of the requesting authority, if the legislation of the Member State of the requested authority allows the information to be used for similar purposes in that Member State.
Pristojni organ države članice, ki zagotovi informacije, lahko dovoli uporabo informacij za druge namene v državi članici organa prosilca, če se lahko v skladu z zakonodajo države članice zaprošenega organa informacije uporabljajo za podobne namene.
However, the competent authority of the Member State providing the information may permit its use for other purposes in the Member State of the requesting authority, if the legislation of the Member State of the requested authority allows the information to be used for similar purposes in that Member State.
Vsako shranjevanje ali izmenjavo informacij iz te uredbe s strani držav članic urejajo nacionalne določbe o izvajanju Direktive 95/46/ES.
All storage or exchange of information by Member States referred to in this Regulation shall be subject to the national provisions implementing Directive 95/46/EC.
Obdelavo osebnih podatkov iz te uredbe s strani držav članic urejajo nacionalne določbe za izvajanje Direktive 95/46/ES.
Processing of personal data by Member States referred to in this Regulation shall be subject to the national provisions implementing Directive 95/46/EC.
Če se je zadevna tretja država pravno obvezala zagotavljati pomoč pri zbiranju dokazov o nepravilnostih pri transakcijah, za katere se zdi, da so v nasprotju s trošarinsko zakonodajo, se lahko informacije, pridobljene v skladu s to uredbo, posreduje navedeni tretji državi s soglasjem pristojnih organov, ki so zagotovili informacije, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo te tretje države za namene, za katere so bile informacije posredovane, ter v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES, zlasti z določbami o prenosu osebnih podatkov v tretjo državo in nacionalnimi pravnimi akti za izvajanje navedene direktive.
Provided the third country concerned has given a legal undertaking to provide the assistance required to gather evidence of the irregular nature of transactions which appear to contravene excise legislation, information obtained under this Regulation may be communicated to that third country, with the consent of the competent authorities which supplied the information, in accordance with their national law, for the same purposes for which this information has been supplied and in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC, in particular provisions on transfers of personal data to third countries, and the national legal measures implementing the Directive.
Če se je zadevna tretja država pravno obvezala zagotavljati pomoč pri zbiranju dokazov o nepravilnostih pri transakcijah, za katere se zdi, da so v nasprotju s trošarinsko zakonodajo, lahko pristojni organ države članice informacije, pridobljene v skladu s to uredbo, posreduje navedeni tretji državi s soglasjem pristojnih organov, ki so zagotovili informacije, v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo te tretje države za namene, za katere so bile informacije posredovane, ter v skladu z Direktivo 95/46/ES, vključno z določbami o prenosu osebnih podatkov v tretjo državo in nacionalnimi pravnimi akti za izvajanje navedene direktive.
Provided the third country concerned has given a legal undertaking to provide the assistance required to gather evidence of the irregular nature of transactions which appear to contravene excise legislation, information obtained under this Regulation may be communicated by a competent authority of a Member State to that third country, with the consent of the competent authorities which supplied the information, in accordance with their national law, for the same purposes for which this information has been supplied and in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC, including the provisions on transfers of personal data to third countries, and the national legal measures implementing the Directive.
Države članice in Komisija preučijo in ocenijo uporabo te uredbe.
The Member States and the Commission shall examine and evaluate the application of this Regulation.
Za ta namen Komisija redno povzema izkušnje držav članic z namenom izboljšanja delovanja sistema, ki ga določa ta uredba.
To that end, the Commission shall regularly summarise the experience of the Member States with the aim of improving the operation of the system established by this Regulation.
Za ta namen Komisija redno primerja in analizira izkušnje držav članic z namenom izboljšanja delovanja sistema, ki ga določa ta uredba.
To that end, the Commission shall regularly compare and analyse the experience of the Member States with the aim of improving the operation of the system established by this Regulation.
Komisija predloži Parlamentu in Svetu do 31. decembra 2012 poročilo o goljufijah na področju trošarin, po potrebi skupaj s predlogi sprememb te uredbe.
The Commission shall present to Parliament and to the Council a report on fraud in the field of excise duties by 31 December 2012, together with amendments to this Regulation if approp ria te.
Zaradi ocenjevanja učinkovitosti tega sistema upravnega sodelovanja pri spodbujanju uporabe trošarinske zakonodaje ter boju proti utajam in goljufijam na področju trošarin lahko države članice sporočijo Komisiji vse razpoložljive informacije, razen informacij iz prvega pododstavka.
With a view to evaluating the effectiveness of this system of administrative cooperation in enforcing the application of the excise legislation and combating evasion and fraud concerning excise duties, Member States may communicate to the Commission any available information other than information referred to in the first subparagraph.
Zaradi ocenjevanja učinkovitosti tega sistema upravnega sodelovanja pri spodbujanju uporabe trošarinske zakonodaje ter boju proti utajam in goljufijam na področju trošarin države članice sporočijo Komisiji vse razpoložljive informacije, razen informacij iz prvega pododstavka.
With a view to evaluating the effectiveness of this system of administrative cooperation in enforcing the application of the excise legislation and combating evasion and fraud concerning excise duties, Member States shall communicate to the Commission any available information other than information referred to in the first subparagraph.
Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te uredbe vsakih pet let od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe predvsem na podlagi informacij, ki jih posredujejo države članice.
Every five years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation and based in particular on the information provided by the Member States, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation.
Komisija poroča Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o uporabi te uredbe vsaka tri leta od datuma začetka veljavnosti te uredbe predvsem na podlagi informacij, ki jih posredujejo države članice.
Every three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation and based in particular on the information provided by the Member States, the Commission shall report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation.
Obdobje petih let za pripravo poročila o uporabi te uredbe se zdi predolgo, zlasti v fazi velikih reform na evropski ravni na področju obdavčitve in fiskalne unije.
A period of five years for providing a Report on the application of this Regulation appears too long, especially in a phase of strong reforms, at the European level, in the field of taxation and fiscal union.
Zato se predlaga krajše obdobje, da se zagotovi bolj učinkovita presoja vpliva in po potrebi morebitna prilagoditev zakonodaje.
A shorter period is therefore proposed, in order to ensure a more effective impact analysis and to where necessary, eventually adapting the legislation.
Elena Băsescu, Philippe De Backer, Herbert Dorfmann, Sari Essayah, Ashley Fox, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Thomas Händel, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis)
Elena Băsescu, Philippe De Backer, Herbert Dorfmann, Sari Essayah, Ashley Fox, Enrique Guerrero Salom, Thomas Händel, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Krišjānis Kariņš, Olle Ludvigsson, Thomas Mann, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Theodoros Skylakakis
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb in javnih listin v zapuščinskih zadevah ter uvedbi evropskega potrdila o dedovanju
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and authentic instruments in matters of succession and the creation of a European Certificate of Succession
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2009)0154 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0154 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 251(2), člena 61(c) in druge alinee člena 67(5) Pogodbe o ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7–0236/2009 ),
– having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 61(c) and the second indent of Article 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0236/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom „Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja“ ( COM(2009)0665 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council entitled 'Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures' ( COM(2009)0665 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in člena 81(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 81(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
UL C 44, 11.02.11, str.
OJ C 44, 11.2.2011, p.
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0045/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0045/2012 ),
o pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju in izvrševanju sodnih odločb, sprejemljivosti in izvrševanju javnih listin v dednih zadevah ter uvedbi evropskega potrdila o dedovanju
on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions , acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and the creation of a European Certificate of Succession
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter zlasti člena 81(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , and in particular Article 81(2) thereof,
(1) Unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, na katerem je zagotovljeno prosto gibanje oseb .
(1) The Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice in which the free movement of persons is ensured .
Za postopno vzpostavitev takšnega območja mora Unija sprejeti ukrepe na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami , zlasti kadar je to potrebno za pravilno delovanje notranjega trga.
For the gradual establishment of such an area, the Union is to adopt measures relating to judicial cooperation in civil matters having cross-border implications, particularly when necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market.
(2) V skladu s točko (c) člena 81(2) Pogodbe so lahko med takšnimi ukrepi tudi ukrepi, katerih cilj je zagotoviti združljivost predpisov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede kolizije zakonov in sporov o pristojnosti.
(2) In accordance with point (c) of Article 81(2) of the Treaty, such measures may include measures aimed at ensuring the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning conflict of laws and of jurisdiction.
(3) Evropski svet je na zasedanju v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 potrdil načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in drugih odločb pravosodnih organov kot temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah ter pozval Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta program ukrepov za izvajanje tega načela.
(3) The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 endorsed the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and other decisions of judicial authorities as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in civil matters and invited the Council and the Commission to adopt a programme of measures to implement that principle.
(4) Skupni program Komisije in Sveta z ukrepi za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
(4) A programme of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters
1. je bil sprejet 30. novembra 2000 .
1. , common to the Commission and to the Council, was adopted on 30 November 2000 .
V tem programu so ukrepi za usklajevanje kolizijskih pravil opredeljeni kot ukrepi , ki naj bi olajšali vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb, predvidena pa je tudi priprava instrumenta, ki bo urejal oporoke in dedovanje .
That programme identifies measures relating to the harmonisation of conflict of laws rules as measures facilitating the mutual recognition of decisions and provides for the drawing up of an instrument relating to wills and succession▌.
(5) Evropski Svet, ki se je sestal 4. in 5. novembra 2004 v Bruslju, je sprejel nov program, imenovan "Haaški program: krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji
(5) The European Council meeting in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004 adopted a new programme called "The Hague Programme: strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union"
(5a) Evropski svet je na zasedanju 10. in 11. decembra 2009 v Bruslju sprejel nov večletni program z naslovom Stockholmski program – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje
(5a) At its meeting in Brussels on 10 and 11 December 2009 t he European Council adopted a new multiannual programme called "The Stockholm Programme – an open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens"
V tem programu je menil, da bi bilo treba vzajemno priznavanje razširiti na področja, na katerih se to načelo še ne uporablja, so pa bistvena za vsakdanje življenje, kot na primer dedovanje in oporoke, ob upoštevanju pravnih sistemov, vključno z javnim redom, in nacionalnih izročil držav članic na tem področju.
In that programme the European Council considered that mutual recognition should be extended to fields that are not yet covered but are essential to everyday life, for example succession and wills, while taking into consideration Member States’ legal systems, including public policy, and national traditions in this area.
(6) Pravilno delovanje notranjega trga bi bilo treba omogočiti z odpravo ovir za prosto gibanje oseb, ki se danes srečujejo s težavami pri uveljavljanju svojih pravic pri dedovanju s čezmejnimi posledicami .
(6) The proper functioning of the internal market should be facilitated by removing the obstacles to the free movement of persons who currently face difficulties asserting their rights in the context of a ▌ succession having cross-border implications .
V evropskem območju pravice morajo imeti državljani možnost vnaprej pripraviti svoje dedovanje.
In the European area of justice, citizens must be able to organise their succession in advance.
Učinkovito je treba zagotavljati pravice dedičev in volilojemnikov, drugih oseb, ki so blizu pokojniku, ter upnikov zapuščine.
The rights of heirs and legatees, of other persons close to the deceased and of creditors of the succession must be effectively guaranteed.
(7) Za dosego teh ciljev bi bilo treba v tej uredbi združiti določbe o ▌pristojnosti, pravu, ki se uporablja, priznavanju ali, odvisno od primera, sprejemljivosti, izvršljivosti in izvrševanju sodnih odločb, javnih listin na tem področju in sodnih poravnav ter evropskem potrdilu o dedovanju.
(7) In order to achieve those objectives, this Regulation should bring together provisions on ▌jurisdiction, on applicable law, on recognition or, as the case may be, acceptance , enforceability and enforcement of decisions, authentic instruments and court settlements and on the European Certificate of Succession.
(8) Področje uporabe te uredbe bi moralo zajemati vsa civilnopravna vprašanja glede dedovanja zapuščine po zapustniku, torej vse oblike prehoda premoženja, pravic in obveznosti zaradi smrti ▌, ne glede na to, ali gre za prehod po volji zapustnika na podlagi razpolaganja za primer smrti ali za prenos z dedovanjem na podlagi zakona .
(8) The scope of this Regulation should include all civil - law aspects of succession to the estate of a deceased person, namely all forms of transfer of assets, rights and obligations by reason of death, be it a voluntary transfer under a disposition of property upon death , or a ▌transfer through intestate succession .
(8a) Ta uredba ne bi smela veljati za davčne zadeve in upravne zadeve s področja javnega prava.
(8a) This Regulation should not apply to revenue matters, or to administrative matters of a public - law nature.
Zato bi morala nacionalna zakonodaja določiti, kako bi bili na primer izračunani in plačani davki in obveznosti s področja javnega prava ne glede na to, ali bi šlo za davke, ki bi jih dolgoval zapustnik v trenutku smrti, ali kakršen koli davek na zapuščino, ki bi ga bilo treba plačati iz zapuščine ali bi ga morali plačati upravičenci.
It should therefore be for national law to determine , for instance , how taxes and other liabilities of a public - law nature are calculated and paid, whether these be taxes payable by the deceased at the time of death or any type of succession-related tax to be paid by the estate or the beneficiaries.
Prav tako bi nacionalna zakonodaja morala določiti, ali naj bo prenos premoženja na upravičence v skladu s to uredbo ali zapis premoženja v register pogojen s plačilom davkov.
It should also be for national law to determine whether the release of succession property to the beneficiaries under this Regulation or the recording of succession property in a register may be made subject to the payment of taxes.
(8b) Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati samo za dedovanje, ne pa tudi za druga področja civilnega prava.
( 8b ) This Regulation should not apply to areas of civil law other than succession.
Zaradi jasnosti bi morala biti nekatera vprašanja, ki bi jih bilo mogoče označiti za povezana z dednimi zadevami, izrecno izključena iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
For reasons of clarity, a number of questions which could be seen as having a link with matters of succession should be explicitly excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
(8c) Ta uredba se torej ne bi smela uporabljati za vprašanja v zvezi s premoženjskopravnimi razmerji med zakoncema, vključno s pogodbami o ureditvi premoženjskopravnih razmerij med zakoncema, kot jih poznajo nekateri pravni sistemi, kolikor te pogodbe ne urejajo dednih zadev, in vprašanja v zvezi s premoženjskopravno ureditvijo razmerij, ki imajo primerljiv učinek kot zakonska zveza .
(8 c ) Thus, this Regulation should not apply to questions relating to matrimonial property regimes, including marriage settlements as known in some legal systems to the extent that such settlements do not deal with succession matters, and property regimes of relationships deemed to have comparable effects to marriage.
Organi, ki obravnavajo določeno dedno zadevo v skladu s to uredbo, pa bi morali glede na okoliščine posameznega primera pri določanju zapuščine zapustnika in posameznih deležev upravičencev upoštevati likvidacijo premoženjskopravnih razmerij med zakoncema ali podobnih premoženjskopravnih razmerij zapustnika.
The authorities dealing with a given succession under this Regulation should nevertheless, depending on the situation, take into account the winding-up of the matrimonial property regime or similar property regime of the deceased when determining the estate of the deceased and the respective shares of the beneficiaries.
(8d) Iz področja uporabe te uredbe bi morala biti izključena tudi vprašanja v zvezi z ustanovitvijo, upravljanjem in likvidacijo skladov.
(8 d ) Q uestions relating to the creation, administration and dissolution of trusts should also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Tega ne bi smeli razumeti kot splošne izključitve skladov.
This should not be understood as a general exclusion of trusts.
Če je sklad ustanovljen z oporoko ali na podlagi zakona v primeru zakonitega dedovanja, bi bilo treba za prehod premoženja in določitev upravičencev uporabljati pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje v skladu s to uredbo.
Where a trust is created under a will or under statute in connection with intestate succession the law applicable to the succession under this Regulation should apply with respect to the devolution of the assets and the determination of the beneficiaries.
(9) ▌ Premoženjske pravice , deleže in stvari, ki so nastali ali prešli drugače kot z dedovanjem, na primer z darili, bi morali biti prav tako izključeni iz področja uporabe te uredbe .
(9) ▌ Property rights , interests and assets created or transferred other wise than by succession , for instance by way of gifts, should also be excluded from the scope of this Regulation .
Vendar bi moralo biti pravo, ki je v tej uredbi opredeljeno kot pravo, ki se uporablja za dedovanje, tisto, ki določa, ali je treba ta darila ali druge oblike razpolaganj inter vivos s takojšnjim stvarnopravnim učinkom vrniti ali zmanjšati zaradi določitve deležev upravičencev po pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje .
However, it should be the law specified by this Regulation as the law applicable to the succession which should determine whether gifts or other forms of dispositions inter vivos giving rise to a right in rem prior to death should be restored or accounted for for the purposes of determining the shares of the beneficiaries in accordance with the law applicable to the succession.
(10) Ta uredba bi morala omogočiti ustanovitev pravice na nepremičnini ali premičnini ali njen prehod z dedovanjem , kot je določeno v pravu, ki se uporablja za dedovanje .
(10) This Regulation should allow for the creation or the transfer by succession of a right in immovable or movable property as provided for in the law applicable to the succession.
Vendar ne bi smela posegati v numerus clausus stvarnih pravic , ki jih pozna nacionalno pravo nekaterih držav članic. ▌ .
It should , however , not affect the limited number▌( “numerus clausus”) of rights in rem known in▌ the national law of some Member States. ▌ .
Državi članici ne bi bilo treba priznati stvarne pravice na nepremičnini, ki je v tej državi članici, če njeno stvarno pravo takšne stvarne pravice ne pozna.
A Member State should not be required to recognise a right in rem relating to property located in that Member State if the right in rem in question is not known in its property law.