natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(i) razvoj vključujoče in kohezivne družbe, kar predpostavlja ukrepe za spodbujanje stalne zaposlitve in spoštovanje pravic delavcev,
(i) the development of an inclusive and cohesive society, which presupposes measures in favour of stable employment and respect for workers’ rights,
(ii) spodbujanje družbe, ki temelji na enakosti spolov in boju proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije,
(ii) the promotion of a society based on gender equality and the combating of all forms of discrimination,
(iii) porazdelitev ustvarjenega bogastva, da bi povečali blaginjo vseh, kar predpostavlja javne in splošne sisteme socialnega varstva ter splošen dostop do kakovostnih javnih storitev, vključno z zdravstvom, izobraževanjem in stanovanji,
(iii) distribution of the wealth created so as to enhance the wellbeing of everyone, which presupposes publicly provided, universal welfare systems and guaranteed, universal access to high-quality public services, including health, education and housing,
(iv) socialna politika, ki upošteva vse skupine,
(iv) a social policy which takes account of all groups,
(v) participativna demokracija kot sestavni del različnih socialnih politik in politik zaposlovanja;
(v) participatory democracy as a component of the various social and employment policies;
poziva k novemu programu okoljske politike z naslednjimi cilji:
Calls for a new environment policy agenda whose objectives should be the following:
(i) ločevanje gospodarske rasti od vzporedne rasti porabe energije, naravnih virov in surovin, vzporedno z njenim zmanjšanjem,
(i) the decoupling of economic growth from the parallel growth of energy, natural resources and raw materials consumption in parallel with its reduction,
(ii) podpora regulativnih okvirov in nadzornih sistemov držav članic za preprečevanje gospodarskih okoljskih eksternalij, zlasti onesnaževanja in emisij toplogrednih plinov,
(ii) support for Member States' regulatory frameworks and monitoring systems that prevent economic environmental externalities, in particular pollution and greenhouse gas emissions,
(iii) podpora naložb, ki spodbujajo zmanjšanje nastajanja odpadkov, ponovno uporabo in recikliranje surovin, pa tudi zmanjšanje nastajanja in ravnanje z nevarnimi industrijskimi in strupenimi odpadki,
(iii) support for investment that promotes reduction of waste, the re-use and recycling of materials, as well the reduction and treatment of hazardous industrial and toxic waste,
(iv) spodbujanje uporabe čistejših in varnejših prometnih sistemov, skupaj z naložbami v kakovosten javni prevoz,
(iv) the promotion of cleaner and safer transport systems, with investment in quality public transport,
(iv) naložbe v okoljske tehnologije, okoljske inovacije in okoljsko učinkovitost;
(iv) investment in eco-technologies, eco-innovation and eco-efficiency;
Nova strategija za boljše plače, zmanjšanje razlik v dohodkih in izkoreninjenje revščine
A new strategy for better wages, reduced income inequalities and poverty eradication
poudarja pomen progresivne politike plač za pospeševanje notranjega povpraševanja, izboljšanje socialnega vključevanja in boj proti razlikam v plačah; obžaluje, da politika EU gleda na plače kot na strošek in ne del nacionalnega dohodka, ki bi prek porabe lahko podprla rast gospodarstva in zaposlovanja; v zvezi s tem obžaluje dejstvo, da zmernost plač še naprej ostaja éden od ciljev integriranih smernic v skladu s stabilnostjo inflacije in ciljnih cen Evropske centralne banke;
Recalls the importance of a progressive wage policy to boost internal demand, promote social inclusion and fight income inequalities; regrets that EU policy sees wages as a cost and not as a part of national income that through spending could sustain economic and employment growth; regrets in that context the fact that wage moderation continues to be one of the aims of the integrated guidelines in line with the inflation-target price stability of the ECB;
meni, da so zakonsko določene minimalne plače nujno sredstvo politike prerazporeditve dohodka, zagotavljajo minimalni prag za plače in dohodke ter pomagajo pri boju proti neenakosti plač in dohodkov, „socialno ogroženim zaposlenim“ in revščini; poziva vse države članice EU k trdni zavezi, da bodo izvrševale zakonsko določene minimalne plače; poziva k usklajenemu povečanju količine zakonsko določene minimalne plače v vsaki državi članici;
Considers that statutory minimum wages are an essential tool of income redistribution policy, guarantee a minimum floor for wages and incomes, helping the fight against wage and incomes inequality, ‘ working poor ’ and poverty; asks for a firm commitment from all EU Member States to implement statutory minimum wages; calls for a coordinated increase in the amount of the statutory minimum wages in each Member State;
je zaskrbljen zaradi velikega števila delavcev, ki so kljub prejemanju plače še vedno pod pragom revščine; poziva k zavezi EU za izkoreninjenje tako imenovanih „socialno ogroženih zaposlenih” do leta 2010;
Is concerned by the high number of workers who, in spite of receiving wages, still lie below the poverty line; calls for an EU commitment to eradicating the so-called ‘ working poor ’ by 2010;
opaža visoko raven neenakosti v dohodkih v EU in poudarja njeno povezavo z visoko ravnijo neenakosti v plačah; poziva, da se EU zaveže, da bo do leta 2010 prepolovila razlike v dohodkih, kot jih kažeta strukturna kazalnika S80/S20 in S90/10, ter poziva spomladanski Evropski svet, naj si postavi ta cilj;
Notes the high level of income inequalities in the EU and stresses its connection with the high level of wage inequalities; calls for an EU commitment to halve income inequalities by 2010 as expressed by the S80/S20 and S90/10 structural indicators and asks the Spring European Council to set this target;
ugotavlja, da je raven revščine v EU visoka in da jo je treba izkoreniniti; poziva, da se EU zaveže, da bo prepolovila delež oseb, ki jim grozi revščina, in izkoreninila revščino otrok do 2010; obžaluje, da v nedavnih spomladanskih poročilih Komisije, sklepih spomladanskega Evropskega sveta in nacionalnih programih reform socialna vključenost ni prednostna naloga; poziva, da se med strukturne kazalnike vključi delež oseb, ki jim grozi revščina, na osnovi 79 % srednje vrednosti dohodka;
Notes the high level of poverty in the EU and the need to eradicate it; calls for an EU commitment to halving the EU at-risk-of-poverty rate and eradicating child poverty by 2010; regrets that the recent Commission spring reports, European Spring Council conclusions and the national reform programmes do not give priority to social inclusion; asks for the inclusion in the structural indicators of an at-risk-of-poverty rate based on the 70% median income;
ugotavlja, da bi se bilo proti denarni revščini mogoče boriti z instrumenti, kot so socialni minimalni dohodek, ki bi jih izplačevale države članice, in poudarja, da bi, če bi bil določen na ravni praga revščine, to izkoreninilo denarno revščino; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi posebno sporočilo o revščini, sredstva za boj proti njej in način, kako bi proračun EU lahko dopolnil ukrepe na ravni držav članic;
Notes that monetary poverty could be fought with instruments like social minimum incomes paid by the Member States and stresses that the establishment of a social minimum income at the poverty level would eradicate monetary poverty; asks the Commission to present a specific communication on poverty, the means to fight it and how the EU budget could complement measures at Member State level;
Nova strategija za polno zaposlenosti, kakovost dela in zaščito delovnih mest
A new strategy for full employment, quality of work and job protection
meni, da bi moralo biti v ospredju vseh politik EU prizadevanje za usmerjenost na zaposlitev in da bi ta moral biti tudi temeljni cilj ekonomske in monetarne politike; poudarja, da delo ni samo vir dohodka, temveč temeljni vidik socialnega vključevanja na vsa področja družbe, pa tudi sestavina osebnega razvoja; ugotavlja, da je bil leta 2005 delež brezposelnih v EU-15 65,2 %, v EU pa 63,8%, kar je daleč od cilja lizbonske strategije, ki je 70 % leta 2010; poziva, da se EU zaveže, da bo ta cilj dosegla, in poziva, da naslednji spomladanski Svet poveča cilj 70 % zaposlenosti za 5 odstotnih točk; poudarja, da povečanje zaposlenosti ne vodi nujno v zmanjšanje brezposelnosti, zato meni, da bi moralo biti usmerjenost na brezposelnost tudi prednostna naloga EU, ter jo poziva, naj do leta 2010 zmanjša povprečni delež nezaposlenih EU za 4 odstotne točke;
Considers that employment-targeting should be a mainstream concern of all EU policies and a fundamental objective of economic and monetary policy; stresses that work represents not only a source of income, but a fundamental aspect of social inclusion in all areas of society, as well an element of personal development; notes that in 2005 the employment rate in the EU-15 was 65.2% and in the EU 63.8%, far from the Lisbon Strategy objective of 70% in 2010; asks for an EU commitment to achieving this target and asks for the next Spring Council to increase the 70% target for the employment rate by 5 percentage points; stresses that employment increases do not necessarily lead to unemployment reduction, therefore considers that unemployment-targeting should also be an EU priority and asks for an EU commitment to reduce the EU average unemployment rate by 4 percentage points by 2010;.
poudarja, da so spodbujanje prilagodljivega trga delovne sile in nestalne oblike zaposlitve v protislovju s potrebo po spodbujanju kakovosti dela v vseh pogledih; ugotavlja, da je reformam trga dela sledil upad rasti produktivnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi sporočilo o povezavi med kakovostjo dela in produktivnostjo;
Stresses that there is a contradiction between promoting a flexible labour market and precarious jobs and the need to promote the quality of work in all its aspects; notes that labour market reforms have been followed by a decline in productivity growth; calls on the Commission to produce a communication on the connection between the quality of work and productivity;
obžaluje, da se večina nacionalnih programov reform osredotoča le na zagotavljanje novih delovnih mest, pri čemer pa zanemarja drugo plat medalje – njihovo kakovost; poudarja, da spodbujanje kakovosti vseh vidikov dela v letnem poročilu o napredku ali v nacionalnih programih reform ni bilo primerno obravnavano, in meni, da bi moralo to biti prednostna naloga EU, saj je tesno povezano s kakovostjo življenja, socialno vključenostjo in produktivnostjo; poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi poseben program Skupnosti, ki bo dopolnil nacionalne ukrepe za spodbujanje kakovosti dela in izmenjavo najboljših praks, z ustreznimi finančnimi sredstvi;
Regrets that most of the national reform programmes concentrate only on ‘more’ jobs, neglecting ‘better’ jobs – the other side of the coin; stresses that the promotion of quality of work in all its aspects has not been properly tackled in the Annual Progress Report or in the national reform programmes and considers that this should be a priority for the EU because it is deeply connected with the quality of life, social inclusion and productivity; calls on the Commission to set up a specific Community programme to complement national actions to promote quality of work and share best practices, with the adequate financial means;
poziva Evropski svet, naj na spomladanskem zasedanju oblikuje cilj, da bo polovica zaposlenih v EU s pogodbo za določen čas do leta 2010 imela pogodbo za nedoločen čas, in naj ustvari posebno shemo spodbud za povečanje stabilnosti delovnih mest, ki bo dopolnjena s proračunom EU; poziva EU in države članice, naj prek politik trga dela razvijejo ukrepe za ustvarjanje priložnosti za zaposlitev s polnim delovnim časom za delavce, ki si niso sami izbrali krajšega delovnega časa; poziva, da se EU zaveže, da bo zmanjšala neprostovoljno delo s krajšim delovnim časom;
Calls on the Spring European Council to establish as a target that half of the percentage of EU employees with fixed-term contracts will have a permanent contract by 2010 and to create a special scheme of incentives to promote job stability, complemented by the EU budget; asks the EU and the Member States to develop measures through labour market policies to create opportunities for full-time jobs for involuntary part-time workers; calls for an EU commitment to reducing involuntary part-time work;
poudarja, da od dejavnih politik trga dela edino usposabljanje pomembno vpliva na skupne rezultate na trgu dela; poudarja, da je potrebno, da ESS še naprej daje glavno prednost usposabljanju, prilagojenemu posebnim potrebam vsake države članice, pa tudi svojo zaskrbljenost, da bo namenjanje sredstev iz strukturnih skladov lizbonski strategiji denar za usposabljanje preusmerilo v druge dejavne politike trga dela; vztraja, da je delež delavcev v usposabljanju še vedno prenizek in da zasebna podjetja niso dovolj prispevala k spodbujanju usposabljanja; poziva delodajalce, naj usposabljanju dajo glavno prednost in ustvarijo pogoje za usposabljanje na delovnem mestu; meni, da bi morale ure usposabljanja šteti kot delovni čas;
Stresses that, of the active labour market policies, only training has a significant impact on aggregate labour market outcomes; points to the need for the ESF to continue to give top priority to training adapted to the specific needs of each Member State and its concern that the earmarking of the structural funds for the Lisbon strategy will shift money from training actions to other active labour market policies; insists that the percentage of workers in training actions is still too low and private business has not contributed enough to training promotion; asks employers to give top priority to training and create the conditions for on-workplace training; considers that training hours should be considered as working time;
poudarja, da je izboljšanje delovnih pogojev bistveni del zagotavljanja kakovostnega dela; je resno zaskrbljen zaradi prožnega delovnega časa, s katerim se delovna sila prilagodi proizvodnemu ciklu, in zaradi učinkov, ki jih imajo sheme, kot so vitka proizvodnja in pospeševanje tempa dela, na zdravje delavcev in nesreče pri delu; meni, da bo predlog Komisije o reviziji direktive o delovnem času, če bo sprejet, poslabšal sedanje razmere; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi sporočilo o vplivu sedanjih predlogov EU v zvezi z delom na zdravje delavcev;
Stresses that improving working conditions is an essential aspect of ensuring the quality of work; is deeply concerned at the flexible work arrangements to adapt the workforce to the production cycle, the effects of schemes like lean production and the speeding-up of work on workers' health and accidents at work; considers that the Commission's proposal on the revision of the Working Time Directive, if carried, will aggravate the present situation; calls on the Commission to produce a communication on the impact of current EU proposals concerning labour on workers' health;
poziva, da se EU odločno zavzame za skrajšanje delovnega časa brez znižanja plač, s čimer bo ustvarila nova delovna mesta in povečala produktivnost; zato poziva Komisijo, da umakne predlog o reviziji direktive o delovnem času; poziva države članice, naj uskladijo prizadevanja za postopno skrajšanje delovnega časa do leta 2010 in poudarja, da je kratkoročni cilj 35-urni delovni teden; meni, da bi skrajšanje delovnega časa brez znižanja plač moralo biti samo po sebi cilj in merilo družbene blaginje;
Calls on the EU for a strong commitment to working-time reduction, without lowering wages, to create new employment and increase productivity; calls, therefore, on the Commission to withdraw its proposal on the revision of the Working Time Directive; calls on Member States to coordinate efforts to gradually reduce working time by 2010 and stresses the short-term objective of a 35-hour week; considers that the reduction of working time, without lowering wages, should be seen as an aim in itself and a measure of societal well being;
meni, da revizija delovnega prava v teku, neobičajne pogodbe o delu, mobilnost kapitala in velika brezposelnost spodkopavajo moč sindikatov; poudarja, kako pomembno je zagotoviti močne sindikate in njihove pravice kot nujno potreben proces za uravnoteženje neenakega odnosa med kapitalom in delom ter v ekonomskih in monetarnih politikah podpreti katerikoli cilj, usmerjen k zaposlovanju;
Considers that the on-going revisions of labour law, atypical work contracts, the mobility of capital and high unemployment undermine the power of trade unions; stresses the importance of guaranteeing strong trade unions and their rights as an indispensable process to balance the uneven relationship between capital and labour and supporting any employment-targeting objective in economic and monetary policies;
Nova strategija za solidarnost in izboljšana socialna država
A new strategy for solidarity and an improved Welfare State
poudarja, da si mora za oblikovanje širše koalicije, naklonjene spremembam, lizbonska strategija prizadevati za boljše, ne pa šibkejše sisteme socialnega varstva (ob zagotavljanju socialnega varstva v primeru bolezni, upokojitve, brezposelnosti in drugih oblik socialnih potreb), in ne sme izvajati pritiskov za zniževanje socialnih standardov; meni, da bi to moralo biti trdna zaveza k solidarnosti v EU;
Insists that, in order to build a broad coalition for change, a new strategy must seek to improve, rather than weaken as envisioned by the Lisbon Strategy, the welfare systems (guaranteeing social protection in case of sickness, retirement, unemployment and other forms of social need) and must not exert downward pressure on social standards; considers that this should be a firm commitment towards solidarity in the EU;
poudarja, da bi moral biti temelj socialne države javni in ustrezno financiran sistem socialne varnosti, ki bi pokrival življenjska tveganja in tveganja pri delu, z javnim pokojninskim sistemom, ki bi temeljil na sprotnem vplačevanju in zagotavljal socialno varnost in solidarnost znotraj generacij in med generacijami; je močno zaskrbljen, ker so glavne smernice druge generacije nacionalnih strateških programov za trajnostne pokojnine v prid privatizaciji socialnega skrbstva, zviševanju upokojitvene starosti in zniževanju ravni prejemkov;
Stresses that a public and properly financed social security system, covering the risks of life and work, with a pay-as-you-go public pension system to guarantee social protection and solidarity in and between generations should form the basis to the Welfare State; is deeply concerned at the fact that the main guidelines of the second-generation national strategy programmes for sustainable pensions are biased towards the privatisation of welfare, an increase in the pension age and a reduction in the level of benefits;
meni, da je pritisk, ki ga Komisija in Svet v okviru lizbonske strategije izvajata za nadaljnjo razgradnjo oz. privatizacijo javnega pokojninskega sistema in zvišanje zakonske in dejanske upokojitvene starosti, neupravičen; zavrača vsak poskus zviševanja zakonske upokojitvene starosti; zavrača mit o neizbežnem zlomu pokojninskih sistemov in meni, da bi se morebitne težave lahko pojavile pri kateri koli kapitalizaciji oziroma sistemu zasebnih računov socialnega zavarovanja, ki jih bo še poslabšalo povečano finančno tveganje zaradi nestanovitnosti finančnih trgov, saj so razlog zanjo gospodarski in zaposlitveni pritiski;
Considers unjustified the pressure exerted by the Commission and the Council through the Lisbon Strategy to further dismantle/privatise the public pensions pillar and increase the effective and statutory retirement age; rejects any attempt to increase the statutory retirement age; denies the myth of an imminent collapse of pension systems and considers that the problems that could exist will be equally presented in any capitalisation or private account system of social security, aggravated by the increased financial risk due the volatility of the financial markets, given that this is due to economic and employment pressures;
poudarja, da je trajnostni sistem socialne varnosti najlažje zagotoviti z doseganjem polne zaposlenosti s pravicami, napredno politiko plač, popolno integracijo/legalizacijo delavcev migrantov, enakopravnejšo porazdelitvijo dohodkov, zadostno rastjo produktivnosti in usklajenim bojem proti delu na črno; meni, da je treba zagotoviti in povečati prispevke delodajalcev za socialno varnost; poudarja, da je treba poiskati nove instrumente za financiranje javnih sistemov socialnega varstva, na primer obdavčitev finančnih transakcij na kapitalskih trgih;
Stresses that the best way to tackle the sustainability of social security is through the achievement of full employment with rights, a progressive wage policy, the full integration/legalisation of migrant workers, a more egalitarian distribution of incomes, sufficient productivity growth and a coordinated fight against undeclared work; considers that it is important to ensure and increase employers’ contributions to social security; stresses the need to find new instruments to finance public social security schemes, like taxing financial transactions on capital markets;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba sredstva za financiranje socialne varnosti posodobiti ob upoštevanju razvoja tehnologije in prispevka kapitalsko intenzivnega poslovanja k nacionalnemu dohodku; meni, da so delovno intenzivna podjetja oškodovana zaradi sistemov prispevkov za socialno varnost, ki se obračunavajo samo na osnovi plač; meni, da bi dopolnilni vir, osnovan na dodani vrednosti podjetja, lahko pomagal zagotoviti bolj pravično obdavčitev in sistemu socialne varnosti zagotovil nova finančna sredstva;
Stresses that the means to finance social security should be updated, taking into account the technology developments and the contribution of capital-intensive business to national income; considers that labour-intensive businesses are penalized by a merely wage-based contribution system to social security; thinks that a complementary resource based on the firm’s added value could help to guarantee more fiscal justice and guarantee new financial means to the social security system;
poudarja, da so potrebni ukrepi za doseganje enakopravnosti moških in žensk (npr. enaka plača, starševski dopust, dostop do kakovostne zaposlitve), in za ustvarjanje boljših pogojev za uskladitev dela in zasebnega življenja; ugotavlja, da je potrebna nova in izboljšana izobraževalna in družbena infrastruktura tako za mlade kot za starejše, vključno s povečanjem in izboljšanjem možnosti za učenje, cenovno ugodnim otroškim varstvom, zdravstveno nego in nego starejših; opozarja države članice, da so se na barcelonskem vrhu leta 2002 zavezale, da bodo do leta 2010 omogočile dnevno otroško varstvo več kot 33 % otrok, mlajših od treh let, in 90 % otrok, starih od treh let do šoloobvezne starosti, ter poziva, da se zaveza v celoti izvaja in nadgradi;
Stresses that policies are needed to achieve equality for women and men (e.g. equal pay, parental leave, access to quality employment) and to create better conditions for reconciling employment and private life; notes the need for enhanced educational and social infrastructures for young and elderly people alike, including increased (and better) facilities for learning, (affordable) childcare, nursing care and care for the elderly; reminds the Member States of the commitment that they entered into at the Barcelona Summit in 2002 whereby, by 2010, they are to provide day-care places for more than 33% of children under the age of three and for 90% of children between the age of three and school-starting age and asks for it to be fully enforced and upgraded;