natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ukrepih za obnovitev
measures for the recovery of the
staleža morskega lista v zahodnem delu Rokavskega preliva in Biskajskem zalivu
sole stocks in the Western Channel and the Bay of Biscay
načrtu upravljanja
a management plan for
(Ta sprememba prav tako povzroči, da se izraz "obnovitev" nadomesti z izrazom "upravljanje" v celotnem zakonodajnem besedilu, razen v členu 3(3).)
(This amendment entails replacing "recovery" by "management" throughout the text with the exception of the last line of Article 3(3)).
Sprememba 2 Uvodna izjava 1
Amendment 2 Recital 1
Iz najnovejšega znanstvenega priporočila Mednarodnega sveta za izkoriščanje morja (ICES) je razvidno, da so staleži morskega lista na območjih ICES VIIe ter VIIIa in b izpostavljeni takšni stopnji ribolovne smrtnosti, ki povzroča uničenje količin odraslih rib v morju do točke, ko se lahko zgodi, da se staleži ne bodo več sposobni obnoviti z razplodom, in jim torej grozi propad.
Recent scientific advice from the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) has indicated that the sole stocks in ICES Divisions VIIe and VIIIa,b have been subjected to levels of mortality by fishing which have eroded the quantities of mature fish in the sea to the point at which the stocks may not be able to replenish themselves by reproduction and that the stocks are therefore threatened with collapse.
Sprememba 3 Uvodna izjava 2 (2)
Amendment 3 Recital 2 (2)
je treba
need to
za izdelavo večletnih načrtov za obnovitev staležev
to establish multi-annual plans for the recovery of
v skladu s
these stocks in conformity with
Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 o ohranjevanju in trajnostnem izkoriščanju ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike.
of Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy.
Sprememba 4 Uvodna izjava 3 (3)
Amendment 4 Recital 3 (3)
Cilj načrtov bi moral biti
The objectives of the plans should be to
varnih bioloških meja
safe biological limits
varnih bioloških meja.
safe biological limits.
Sprememba 5 Uvodna izjava 3a (novo)
Amendment 5 Recital 3 a (new)
Sprememba 6 Uvodna izjava 3b (novo)
Amendment 6 Recital 3 b (new)
(3b) Komisija in države članice poskrbijo, da pri izvajanju načrta v polni meri sodelujejo regionalni svetovalni sveti in druge zainteresirane strani.
(3b) In implementing the plan, the Commission and the Member States should ensure the full participation of the Regional Advisory Councils and other stakeholders.
Sprememba 7 Uvodna izjava 5
Amendment 7 Recital 5
Absolutne velikosti zadevnih staležev, kot sta jih ocenila Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo (STECF) in ICES, niso dovolj zanesljive, da bi se lahko uporabile kot cilj za obnovitev staležev, zato morajo biti cilji izraženi v stopnjah ribolovne smrtnosti.
The absolute sizes of the stocks concerned as estimated by STECF and ICES are too uncertain to be used as targets for the recovery and the targets should be expressed in terms of fishing mortality rates.
Sprememba 8 Uvodna izjava 6
Amendment 8 Recital 6
Da bi dosegli ta cilj, je treba nadzorovati ravni stopenj ribolovne smrtnosti tako, da obstaja velika verjetnost njihovega zmanjšanja iz leta v leto.
In order to achieve that objective, the levels of fishing mortality rates need to be controlled so that it is highly likely that those rates are reduced from year to year.
Sprememba 9 Uvodna izjava 8
Amendment 9 Recital 8
Ko bodo staleži obnovljeni, naj Svet na podlagi predloga Komisije odloča o nadaljnjih ukrepih, ki jih je treba izvesti v skladu s členom 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002.
Once recovery has been achieved the Council should decide on a proposal from the Commission on follow-up measures in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Sprememba 10 Člen 2
Amendment 10 Article 2
staležev morskega lista do mere, ki je znotraj varnih bioloških meja.
the sole stocks concerned within safe biological limits.
Sprememba 12 Člen 3, odstavek 2
Amendment 12 Article 3, paragraph 2
Kadar Komisija na podlagi letne ocene ugotovi, da je cilj iz člena 2 za katerega od zadevnih staležev morskega lista dosežen, Svet za zadevni stalež na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino odloča o nadomestitvi načrta obnove, predvidenega v tej uredbi, z načrtom upravljanja iz člena 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002.
Where the Commission finds, on the basis of the annual evaluation, that any of the sole stocks concerned has reached the objective set out in Article 2, the Council shall decide by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission to replace, for that stock, the recovery plan provided for in this Regulation by a management plan in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002.
Sprememba 13 Člen 3, odstavek 3 3.
Amendment 13 Article 3, paragraph 3 3.
Kadar Komisija na podlagi letne ocene ugotovi, da kateri od zadevnih staležev morskega lista
Where the Commission finds, on the basis of the annual evaluation, that any of the sole stocks concerned
ne kaže znakov zadostne obnove
do not show proper sign of recovery
, Svet za zadevni stalež na predlog Komisije s kvalificirano večino odloča o dodatnih ukrepih in/ali drugih ukrepih za zagotovitev obnove zadevnega staleža.
, the Council shall decide by qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission on additional and/or alternative measures to ensure recovery of the stock concerned.
resno ogrožen
are at risk of collapse
Sprememba 14 Člen 5, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 14 Article 5, paragraph 1 1.
Kadar stopnja ribolovne smrtnosti enega od zadevnih staležev morskega lista po ocenah Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo v luči zadnjega poročila ICES presega 0,14 na leto, celotni dovoljeni ulov za ta stalež ne sme preseči ravni ulova, ki bo, po znanstveni oceni Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvov luči zadnjega poročila ICES, povzročil zmanjšanje:
Where the fishing mortality rate for one of the sole stocks concerned has been estimated by the STECF in the light of the most recent report of ICES to be above 0.14 per year, the TAC for that stock shall not exceed a level of catches which, according to a scientific evaluation carried out by the STECF in the light of the most recent report of ICES, will result in a reduction of:
Celotni dovoljeni ulov (TAC) ne sme preseči ravni ulova, za katero je znanstvena ocena Znanstvenega, tehničnega in gospodarskega odbora za ribištvo v luči zadnjega poročila ICES, pokazala, da omogoča povečanje populacije odraslih rib v morju za 15 % ob koncu leta izvajanja glede na ocene količin, ki so se nahajale v morju na začetku zadevnega leta.
The TAC shall not exceed a level of catches for which a scientific evaluation by the STECF, carried out in the light of the most recent report of ICES, has shown that it will result in a 15% increase in the quantities of adult fish in the sea, at the end of its year of application, by comparison with the quantities estimated to be present in the sea at the start of the year in question.
Sprememba 15 Člen 5, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 15 Article 5, paragraph 2 2.
Svet ne sprejme celotnega dovoljenega ulova, za katerega Znanstveni, tehnični in gospodarski odbor za ribištvo v luči zadnjega poročila ICES ocenjuje, da bi v letu njegovega izvajanja povzročil stopnjo ribolovne smrtnosti, višjo od naslednjih vrednosti:
The Council shall not adopt a TAC which the STEFC, in the light of the most recent report of ICES, expects would result, in the year of its application, in a fishing mortality rate in excess of the following values:
a) 0,11 v letu njegovega izvajanja kar zadeva stalež morskega lista na območju VIIe;
(a) 0.11 per year in the year of its application with regard to the sole stock in Division VIIe;
Morski list v Biskajskem zalivu: 0,36;
Bay of Biscay sole: 0.36;
b) 0,09 v letu njegovega izvajanja kar zadeva stalež morskega lista na območjih VIIIa in VIIIb.
(b) 0.09 per year in the year of its application with regard to the sole stock in Divisions VIIIa and b.
Morski list v zahodnem Rokavskem prelivu: stopnja se določi naknadno v skladu z mnenjem ICES po preučitvi vrste podatkov določenih držav, ki do danes še niso bili upoštevani.
Western Channel sole: rate to be defined in view of subsequent ICES advice, following the inclusion of data series from certain countries which are currently not taken into account.
Sprememba 16 Člen 6, odstavka 1 in 2
Amendment 16 Article 6, paragraphs 1 and 2
(a) v primeru, da bi uporaba člena 5 povzročila povečanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova za več kot 25 % v primerjavi s predhodnim letom, sprejme Svet celotni dovoljeni ulov, ki celotnega dovoljenega ulova tistega leta ne presega za več kot 25 %;
(a) where application of Article 5 would result in a TAC which exceeds the TAC of the preceding year by more than 25%, the Council shall adopt a TAC which shall not be more than 25% greater than the TAC of that year;
(b) v primeru, da bi uporaba člena 5 povzročila zmanjšanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova za več kot 25 % v primerjavi s predhodnim letom, Svet sprejme celotni dovoljeni ulov, ki ni manjši od celotnega dovoljenega ulova tistega leta za več kot 25 %;
where application of Article 5 would result in a TAC which is more than 25% less than the TAC of the preceding year, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is not more than 25% less than the TAC of that year.
uporaba člena 5 povzročila zmanjšanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova za več kot 15 % v primerjavi s predhodnim letom, sprejme Svet celotni dovoljeni ulov, ki ni manjši od celotnega dovoljenega ulova tega leta za več kot 15 %;
(b) where application of Article 5 would result in a TAC which is more than 15% less than the TAC of the preceding year, the Council shall adopt a TAC which is not more than 15% less than the TAC of that year.
Sprememba 17 Poglavje III
Amendment 17 Chapter III
Sprememba 18 Člen 16
Amendment 18 Article 16
Z odstopanjem od člena 5(2) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2807/83 z dne 22. septembra 1983 o podrobnih pravilih za evidentiranje podatkov o ulovu rib držav članic, znaša dopustno odstopanje pri oceni količin v kilogramih na krovu plovila
By way of derogation from Article 5(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 of 22 September 1983 laying down detailed rules for recording information on Member States" catches of fish, the permitted margin of tolerance, in estimation of quantities, in kilograms retained on board of vessels shall be
vrednosti, navedene v ladijskem dnevniku.
of the logbook figure.
Z odstopanjem od člena 5(2) Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2807/83 z dne 22. septembra 1983 o podrobnih pravilih za evidentiranje podatkov o ulovu rib držav članic, znaša dopustno odstopanje pri oceni količin v kilogramih
By way of derogation from Article 5(2) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2807/83 of 22 September 1983 laying down detailed rules for recording information on Member States" catches of fish, the permitted margin of tolerance, in estimation of quantities, in kilograms
žive teže
of live weight
V primeru, da v zakonodaji Skupnosti ni določen faktor konverzije, se uporablja faktor, ki ga je sprejela država članica, pod katere zastavo pluje plovilo.
In the event that no conversion factor is laid down in Community legislation, the conversion factor adopted by the Member State whose flag the vessel is flying shall apply.
Sprememba 19 Člen 17
Amendment 19 Article 17
Pristojni organi države članice zagotovijo, da se vsaka količina morskega lista, ki presega
The competent authorities of a Member State shall ensure that any quantity of common sole exceeding
, ujeta na kateremkoli območju iz člena 1, pred prodajo stehta z dražbenimi tehtnicami.
caught in any of the areas referred to in Article 1 shall be weighed using auction room scales before sale.
Sprememba 20 Člen 19, odstavek 1 1.
Amendment 20 Article 19, paragraph 1 1.
Pristojni organi države članice lahko zahtevajo, da se vsaka količina morskega lista, ki presega
The competent authorities of a Member State may require that any quantity of common sole exceeding
, ujeta na kateremkoli območju iz člena 1, in prvič pristane v tej državi članici, stehta pred prevozom iz prvega pristanišča.
caught in any of the geographical areas referred to in Article 1 and first landed in that Member State is weighed before being transported elsewhere from the port of first landing.
Sprememba 21 Člen 19, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 21 Article 19, paragraph 2 2.
Z odstopanjem od člena 13 Uredbe (EGS) št. 2847/93 spremlja količine morskega lista, večje od
By way of derogation from Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93, quantities bigger than
in prepeljane na kraj, ki ni kraj raztovarjanja ali uvoza, izvod ene od deklaracij iz člena 8(1) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2847/93 v zvezi s prepeljanimi količinami morskega lista.
of common sole which are transported to a place other than that of landing or import shall be accompanied by a copy of one of the declarations provided for in Article 8(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 pertaining to the quantities of the sole transported.
Izjema iz člena 13(4)(b) Uredbe (EGS) št. 2847/93 se ne uporablja.
The exemption provided for in Article 13(4)(b) of Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 shall not apply.
Sprememba 22 Priloga
Amendment 22 Annex
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o homologaciji motornih vozil glede njihove ponovne uporabnosti, recikliranja in predelave ter spremembi Direktive Sveta 70/156/EGS (KOM(2004)0162 – C5-0126/2004 – 2004/0053(COD))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the type-approval of motor vehicles with regard to their re-usability, recyclability and recoverability and amending Council Directive 70/156/EEC ( COM(2004)0162 – C5-0126/2004 – 2004/0053(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM(2004)0162) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0162 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C5-0126/2004 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C5-0126/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0004/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0004/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C …, …, str. …
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C ..., ..., p. ...
v skladu s postopkom, navedenim v členu 251 Pogodbe
Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 251 of the Treaty
Stališče Evropskega Parlamenta z dne 14. aprila 2005.
Position of the European Parliament of 14 April 2005.
V skladu s členom 7(4) Direktive 2000/53/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. septembra 2000 o izrabljenih vozilih UL L 269, 21.10.2000, str.
Pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of-life vehicles OJ L 269, 21.10.2000, p.
Ponovna uporabnosti sestavnih delov, možnost recikliranja in predelave materialov predstavlja pomemben del strategije Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki.
Re-usability of component parts, recyclability and recoverability of materials constitute a substantial part of the Community strategy for waste management.
Zato se od proizvajalcev in njihovih dobaviteljev zahteva, da v začetni fazi razvijanja novih vozil vključijo te vidike za lažje ravnanje z vozili ob koncu njihove življenjske dobe.
Therefore vehicle manufacturers and their suppliers should be requested to include those aspects at the earliest stages of the development of new vehicles, in order to facilitate the treatment of vehicles at the time where they reach the end of their life.
Ta direktiva predstavlja posebno direktivo v okviru homologacije celotnega vozila na ravni Skupnosti, ki jo določa Direktiva Sveta 70/156/EGS z dne 6. februarja 1970 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o homologaciji motornih in priklopnih vozil UL L 42, 23.2.1970, str.
This Directive constitutes one of the separate directives within the framework of the Community whole vehicle type-approval established by Council Directive 70/156/EEC of 6 February 1970 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the type-approval of motor vehicles and their trailers OJ L 42, 23.2.1970, p.
Homologacija celotnega vozila je trenutno obvezna za vozila kategorije M1 in bo v bližnji prihodnosti razširjena na vozila vseh kategorij.
That whole vehicle type-approval is currently compulsory for vehicles belonging to category M1 and will be extended, in the near future, to all categories of vehicle.
Zato je treba v homologacijo celotnega vozila vključiti določbe v zvezi s ponovno uporabnostjo, možnostjo recikliranja in predelave vozil.
It is therefore necessary to include in the whole vehicle type-approval these measures concerning the re-usability, recyclability and recoverability of vehicles.
V skladu s tem je treba sprejeti določbe, ker sistem homologacije celotnega vozila še ne krije vozil kategorije N1.
Accordingly, it is necessary to lay down provisions to take into account the fact that N1 vehicles are not yet covered by the whole vehicle type-approval system.
Proizvajalec mora nuditi homologacijskemu organu vse pomembne tehnične informacije o sestavnih materialih in njihovih masah, da bi jim omogočil preverjanje izračunov proizvajalca v skladu s standardom ISO 22628 : 2002.
The manufacturer should make available to the approval authority all relevant technical information as regards constituent materials and their respective masses in order to permit verification of the manufacturer's calculations in accordance with the standard ISO 22628 : 2002.
Pred izdajo katere koli homologacije mora pristojni organ predhodno oceniti te določbe in postopke ter izdati potrdilo o njihovi pravilnosti.
should carry out a preliminary assessment of those arrangements and procedures and should issue a certificate indicating that they are satisfactory.
Pomembnost in ustreznost različnih spremenljivk v izračunih stopenj možnosti recikliranja in predelave vozil se oceni v skladu s postopki za ravnanje z izrabljenimi vozili.
The relevance of the different inputs in the calculations of the recyclability and recoverability rates has to be assessed in accordance with the processes for treatment of end-of-life vehicles.
Proizvajalec mora zato priporočiti strategijo za ravnanje z izrabljenimi vozili in jo natančno opisati pristojnemu organu.
The manufacturer should therefore recommend a strategy for the treatment of end-of-life vehicles and should provide with details thereof to the competent
Vozila za posebne namene so namenjena posebnim funkcijam in zahtevajo posebno prilagoditev nadgradnje, ki ni popolnoma pod nadzorom proizvajalca.
Special-purpose vehicles are designed to perform a specific function and require special bodywork arrangements which are not entirely under the control of the manufacturer.
Zato ni mogoče pravilno izračunati stopenj možnosti recikliranja in predelave vozil.
Consequently, the recyclability and recoverability rates cannot properly be calculated.
Ta vozila so torej izključena iz zahtev, ki se nanašajo na izračun.
Those vehicles should therefore be excluded from the requirements concerning calculation.
Nepopolna vozila so pomemben del vozil N1.
Incomplete vehicles constitute a significant proportion of N1 vehicles.
Proizvajalec osnovnega vozila ne more izračunati stopenj možnosti recikliranja in predelave za dokončana vozila, ker v fazi načrtovanja osnovnih vozil nima na razpolago podatkov o nadaljnjih fazah izdelovanja.
The manufacturer of the base vehicle is not in a position to calculate the recyclability and recoverability rates for completed vehicles because the data concerning the later stages of construction are not available at the design stage of the base vehicles.
Zato morajo zahteve iz te direktive izpolnjevati samo osnovna vozila.
It is therefore appropriate to require only the base vehicle to comply with this Directive.
Tržni deleži vozil, proizvedenih v majhnih serijah, so zelo omejeni, tako da bi korist za okolje, če bi morala izpolnjevati zahteve iz te direktive, bila zanemarljiva.
The market shares of vehicles produced in small series are very limited, so that there will be little benefit to the environment if they have to comply with this Directive.
Zato je primerno, da se jih izključi iz nekaterih določb te direktive.
It is therefore appropriate to exclude them from certain provisions of this Directive.
V skladu s členom 7(5) Direktive 2000/53/ES je treba zaradi cestne varnosti in varstva okolja sprejeti primerne ukrepe, da bi preprečili ponovno uporabo nekaterih sestavnih delov, ki so bili odstranjeni iz izrabljenih vozil.
In accordance with Article 7(5) of Directive 2000/53/EC, appropriate measures should be taken, in the interests of road safety and protection of the environment, to prevent the re-use of certain component parts which have been removed from end-of-life vehicles.
Ti ukrepi morajo biti omejeni na ponovno uporabo delov pri izdelavi novih vozil.
Such measures should be restricted to the re-use of parts in the construction of new vehicles.
V skladu s to direktivo bodo proizvajalci morali zagotoviti nove podatke v zvezi s homologacijo; iz tega razloga se morajo te posebnosti odražati v Direktivi 70/156/EGS, ki določa izčrpen seznam podatkov, potrebnih za homologacijo.
The provisions set out in this Directive will impose on manufacturers the supply of new data relating to type-approval and therefore these particulars should be reflected in Directive 70/156/EEC, which establishes the exhaustive list of data to be submitted for type-approval.
Zato je treba v skladu s tem spremeniti direktivo.
It is therefore necessary to amend that Directive accordingly.
Ukrepi, potrebni za prilagoditev te direktive tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku, se sprejmejo v skladu
The measures necessary for the adaptation to scientific and technical progress of this Directive should be adopted in accordance with
Direktive 70/156/EGS.
of Directive 70/156/EEC.
Ker ciljev predlaganih ukrepov, tj. čim bolj zmanjšati učinek izrabljenih vozil na okolje tako, da se jih od začetka načrtuje z namenom olajšati možnost ponovne uporabe, recikliranja in predelave, ni mogoče doseči v zadostni meri na ravni posameznih držav članic, marveč jih je zaradi obsega predloženih ukrepov lažje doseči na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, določenim v členu 5 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti.
Since the objectives of the proposed action, namely to minimise the impact of end-of-life vehicles on the environment by requiring that vehicles be designed from the conception phase with a view to facilitating re-use, recycling and recovery, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States acting alone and can, therefore, by reason of the scale of the action, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
Države članice se v skladu z odstavkom 34 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje spodbuja, naj zase in za interese Skupnosti sestavijo lastne tabele, s katerimi bodo čim bolje prikazale povezavo med direktivo in prenosom ukrepov ter jih objavijo –
In accordance with paragraph 34 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making, Member States are encouraged to draw up, for themselves and in the interest of the Community, their own tables which will, as far as possible, illustrate the correlation between the Directive and the transposition measures and to make them public,
SPREJLA NASLEDNJO DIREKTIVO:
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE: