natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da je sedanji sistem navzkrižne skladnosti, vpeljan zaradi zagotavljanja visokih meril za dobro počutje živali, njihovo zdravje in okoljsko zaščito, za kmete problematičen in v sedanji obliki mogoče ni najboljše sredstvo za dosego želenih rezultatov; poziva, da se v naslednji reformi SKP bolj poudarijo bolj trajnostni in učinkovitejši proizvodni modeli, zavedati pa se je treba, da to zahteva javna sredstva, ki bodo kmetom omogočila kritje povečanih stroškov za dobavo „javnih dobrin“ v korist celotne družbe (kot je vzdrževanje površin na podeželju, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, zajemanje ogljika, zanesljiva preskrba s hrano);
Notes that the current cross-compliance system, which was designed to ensure that agricultural producers meet very high standards in terms of animal welfare, animal health and environmental protection, has been problematic for farmers and has, in its current form, perhaps not been the best means of achieving the desired outcomes; calls, in the context of the next reform of the CAP, for greater emphasis on more sustainable and more efficient production models, bearing in mind that these require public funding to enable farmers to cover the extra costs arising from the supply of ‘public goods’ of benefit to the whole of society (such as the preservation of rural areas, biodiversity conservation, carbon capture and food security);
priznava, da mora SKP postaviti najvišja svetovna merila za varstvo okolja; opozarja, da to pomeni tako visoke stroške, da jih trg ne bo mogel kriti, čeprav se lahko delno štejejo kot posredovanje javnih dobrin, in da bodo evropski proizvajalci potrebovali zaščito pred konkurenco iz tretjih držav, ki ne izpolnjujejo okoljskih meril EU;
Recognises that the CAP needs to set world-leading standards in environmental protection; points out that this will mean a level of cost which cannot be recovered from the market, although in part that can be regarded as delivery of public goods, and that European producers will need protection from third-country competition which does not meet EU environmental standards;
meni, da podnebno segrevanje sili Unijo k prilagajanju modelov kmetijske politike; zato poziva Komisijo, naj v svojem prihodnjem sporočilu o reformi SKP po letu 2013 spodbuja bolj trajnostni in učinkovitejši kmetijski model v skladu z vsemi cilji SKP, usmerjene v proizvodnjo zadostne količine varne hrane in bolj spoštljive do okoljskega ravnotežja; tak model mora temeljiti na pravičnem in upravičenem sistemu pomoči kmetom ter mora tudi povečati pomen poklica kmeta;
Takes the view that climate change is forcing the Union to adapt the agricultural policy model; consequently calls on the Commission, in its future communication on CAP reform after 2013, to promote a more sustainable and efficient agricultural model in line with all the aims of the CAP, geared to producing sufficient, safe food and more respectful of environmental balance; such a model must be based on a fair and legitimate farmer support system and must also enhance the role of the farming profession;
meni, da je treba ohraniti ambiciozno skupno kmetijsko politiko, da bi evropsko kmetijstvo v prihodnosti lahko prispevalo k zanesljivi preskrbi s hrano in varstvu podnebja, kar vključuje zlasti sistem neposrednih plačil iz proračuna Skupnosti ter poenostavljena in pravičnejša plačila v vsej EU;
Considers that, to enable European agriculture to contribute in future to food security and climate protection, an ambitious CAP must be maintained, including in particular the system of direct payments from the Community budget and simplified and fair payments for the EU as a whole;
poudarja, da je pomembno ustvariti in zagotoviti trajno podlago za razvoj alternativnih gospodarskih dejavnosti, ki bodo zmanjšale odvisnost lokalnih skupnosti od kmetijske proizvodnje, ki jo lahko prizadene suša, ali od naravnih virov; meni, da je dostop do finančnih sredstev iz evropskih skladov odločilnega pomena za zagotavljanje pogojev za razvoj alternativnih gospodarskih dejavnosti;
Stresses the importance of creating and permanently guaranteeing the basis for the development of alternative economic activities that will gradually reduce local communities‘ dependence on drought-affected agricultural production or on natural resources; takes the view that access to financing from European funds is a key factor in safeguarding the conditions in which alternative economic activities are carried out;
meni, da je pomembno podpreti prakso celovitega načrtovanja razvoja podeželskih območij, prilagojenega lokalnim potrebam, in sicer z uvedbo načela najboljše rabe zemljišč, ter tako trg dobrin in storitev na lokalni ravni prilagoditi novim okoljskim razmeram (daljša sušna obdobja, plazovi, poplave itd.);
Stresses the importance of promoting integrated development planning practices in rural areas in line with local needs, by introducing principles based on optimising land use in order to adapt to changing environmental conditions (prolonged drought, landslides, floods, etc.) and to the market for products and services that can be supplied at local level;
prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o novih sistemih pomoči, ki bodo podprli prispevek kmetijstva k zmanjšanju CO2, kot je fiksiranje ogljika v kmetijskih zemljiščih in biomasi, in ki bodo spodbujali rabo kmetijsko zemljišč, kar bo pozitivno prispevalo k blaženju podnebnih sprememb,
Also calls on the Commission to give thought to new support systems that support the contribution which farming makes to reducing CO2, such as carbon fixing in farm soil and biomass, and that encourage agricultural use of areas that make a positive contribution to climate change;
poudarja, da mora Komisija predložiti natančne ocene stroškov prilagajanja kmetijstva podnebnim spremembam;
Stresses the need for accurate Commission estimates of the costs of adapting agriculture to climate change;
meni, da je treba okrepiti instrumente za upravljanje tveganj in kriz in jih prilagoditi povečani negotovosti trgov in razvoju podnebnih tveganj;
Considers it essential to strengthen risk and crisis management instruments and adapt them to increasing market volatility and growing climatic risks;
poudarja, da se morata kmetijski in gozdarski sektor zaradi obsežnosti podnebnih izzivov in naložb usmeriti v trajnostne načine proizvodnje in da je treba obdržati močno SKP z ustreznim proračunom tudi po letu 2013; dodaja, da je treba predvideti nove finančne vire za spodbujanje širjenja modernih in inovativnih tehnologij in sistemov, ki lahko v različnih kmetijskih sektorjih dajo dejanske rezultate pri blažitvi in prilagajanju;
Emphasises, given the scale of the climate challenge and investment, that the farming and forestry management community must focus on more sustainable modes of production and there is a need to retain a strong CAP with a commensurate budget beyond 2013; adds that provision must be made for new additional funding to be used to provide incentives to disseminate modern and innovative technologies and systems which can achieve practical results in terms of mitigation and adjustment in the various sectors of agriculture;
poudarja, da četudi SKP ni evropska politika, katere glavna skrb bi bilo podnebje, mora kljub temu biti osnova za uvedbo učinkovitih instrumentov in spodbud v boju proti podnebnim spremembam, kar je treba upoštevati pri razpravah o prihodnjem proračunu EU;
Stresses that, although the CAP is not a European climate policy, it must nevertheless be the basis for the introduction of effective instruments and incentives to combat climate change, something which should also be borne in mind when discussing the future of the EU budget;
meni, da mora Evropska unija ohraniti svojo vodilno vlogo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam, ki se zaradi sedanjih gospodarskih težav ne bi smele obravnavati kot drugorazredno vprašanje;
Takes the view that the European Union should maintain its leading position in the battle against climate change, and that it should not slip to number two as a result of the current economic difficulties;
poudarja, da Evropska unija potrebuje razvojno politiko in politiko financiranja kmetijstva, ki bo zagotavljalo varno in kakovostno hrano;
Stresses that the European Union needs development and financing policies for agriculture that guarantee safe and high-quality food;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Member States‘ governments and parliaments.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 o kmetijstvu na območjih z naravnimi omejitvami: poseben pregled ( 2009/2156(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 5 May 2010 on agriculture in areas with natural handicaps: a special health check ( 2009/2156(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 39 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom Boljšemu usmerjanju pomoči kmetom na območjih z naravnimi omejitvami naproti KOM(2009)0161 ,
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Towards a better targeting of the aid to farmers in areas with natural handicaps’ ( COM(2009)0161 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 17. decembra 2009 o sporočilu Komisije,
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission, delivered on 17 December 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0056/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0056/2010 ),
ker je s 54 odstotki več kot polovica kmetijskih zemljišč v EU uvrščenih med območja z omejenimi možnostmi,
whereas, at 54%, more than half of the utilised agricultural area in the EU is classed as less-favoured areas,
ker so vse države članice določile območja z omejenimi možnostmi, vendar v različnem obsegu,
whereas each Member State has designated less-favoured areas, although to a differing extent,
ker predstavljajo gorske regije (vključno z arktičnimi regijami severno od 62. vzporednika, ki so izenačene z gorskimi regijami) približno 16 % kmetijskih zemljišč, vendar je več kot 35 % kmetijskih zemljišč uvrščenih med tako imenovana „vmesna območja z omejenimi možnostmi“,
whereas mountain areas (including arctic regions north of the 62nd parallel which are also regarded as mountain areas) account for around 16% of the utilised agricultural area, whilst over 35% of the utilised agricultural area is classed as ‘intermediate LFAs’,
ker le majhen del kmetij na teh območjih prejema nadomestila, višina teh izplačil pa se med državami članicami bistveno razlikuje Od 16 EUR/ha v Španiji do 250 EUR/ha na Malti.
whereas only a small proportion of farms in these areas receive compensatory payments and the level of these payments varies significantly between the Member States From 16 EUR/ha in Spain to 250 EUR/ha in Malta.
ker za gorska območja in območja s posebnimi omejitvami, ki so bila opredeljena v skladu s členom 50(2) (gorska območja) oz. členom 50(3)(b) Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1698/2005 z dne 20. septembra 2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželje (EKSRP), veljajo jasna in nesporna merila, tako da Evropsko računsko sodišče ni kritiziralo določitve teh območij niti o tem ne govori sedanje sporočilo Komisije,
whereas for mountain areas and areas with specific handicaps, which are defined in Article 50(2) and Article 50(3)(b) respectively of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), there are clear and uncontested criteria, so that the classification of these areas has neither been criticised by the European Court of Auditors nor is affected by the current Commission communication,
ker so zaradi posebnih razmer v najbolj oddaljenih regijah potrebni posebni načini obravnave,
whereas the particular situation in the outermost regions requires the implementation of specific procedures to deal with them,
ker je podpora za območja z omejenimi možnostmi bistveni del tako imenovanega drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike, torej politike za razvoj podeželja, tako da v središču razprave ne smejo biti niti regionalnopolitični cilji niti vprašanje prerazporeditve sredstev Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja,
whereas support for less favoured areas is an essential component of the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, namely rural development policy, and consequently neither regional policy objectives nor the issue of the redistribution of EAFRD funding should be at the heart of the debate,
ker je bila z reformo zakonodaje o podpori območjem z omejenimi možnostmi in s sprejetjem Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 odpravljena prej obstoječa kategorija „vmesnih območij z omejenimi možnostmi“, upravičena območja pa so bila opredeljena kot „območja s pomembnimi naravnimi omejitvami“,
whereas, as a result of the reform of legislation on support for less-favoured areas and the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the previous category of ‘intermediate LFAs’ has been abolished and eligible areas are defined as areas ‘affected by significant natural handicaps’,
ker se socialno-ekonomskih meril ne sme več uporabljati kot glavna merila za razmejevanje območij z „naravnimi omejitvami“ , kot so jih nekatere države članice uporabljale pred reformo leta 2005, vendar se ta merila lahko še naprej uporabljajo za opredelitev območij „s posebnimi omejitvami“, ki prejemajo podporo v skladu s členom 50(3)(b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005,
whereas the socio-economic criteria used prior to the 2005 reform by some Member States may no longer be used to delimit areas with ‘natural handicaps’, but may continue to be used to define areas with ‘specific handicaps’, which are supported pursuant to Article 50(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005,
ker imajo države članice pri oblikovanju nacionalnih in regionalnih programov za razvoj podeželja veliko manevrskega prostora, da predložijo uravnotežen sveženj ukrepov, prilagojen njihovim specifičnim regionalnim razmeram, in ker so države članice v programih dolžne predložiti ustrezne ukrepe za svoje regije z omejenimi možnostmi,
whereas, in formulating their national and regional programmes for rural development, Member States have significant room for manoeuvre in order to present a balanced set of measures adapted to their specific regional situation, and whereas it falls to the Member States to present suitable measures for their less favoured areas within their programmes,
ker se lahko izkaže, da predlaganih osem biofizikalnih meril ne bo zadostovalo in predlagana mejna vrednost 66 % površine ne bo vedno primerna za ugotavljanje dejanskih omejitev ob hkratnem upoštevanju velike raznolikosti podeželja EU; ker so gojene kulture ter kombinacija tipov in vlažnosti tal ter podnebja tudi pomembni dejavniki za ugotavljanje dejanskih omejitev na danem območju,
whereas the proposed eight biophysical criteria might not prove to be sufficient and the proposed threshold value of 66% of the area might not be found suitable in all cases for determining the actual handicap in a manner respectful of the great diversity of EU rural areas; whereas the crop grown, the combination of soil types, soil moisture and climate are, among others, also factors relevant for the purpose of determining the actual handicap in a given area,
poudarja pomen ustreznih nadomestil za območja z omejenimi možnostmi, ki so nujna za zagotavljanje pomembnih javnih dobrin, kot je ohranjanje obdelovanja zemljišč in kulturne krajine v teh regijah; poudarja, da so ravno območja z omejenimi možnostmi pogosto velikega pomena za kulturno krajino, ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti in koristi za okolje ter zaposlenosti na podeželju in vitalnosti podeželskih skupnosti;
Stresses the importance of an appropriate compensatory payment for less-favoured areas as an indispensable tool to secure the provision of high-value public goods such as maintaining the management of the land and the cultivated landscape in these regions; emphasises that less-favoured areas, in particular, are often of high value in terms of the cultivated landscape, biodiversity preservation and environmental benefits, as well as rural employment and the vitality of rural communities;
se zaveda, da imajo območja z omejenimi možnostmi zaradi svojega edinstvenega položaja pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju okoljskih koristi in ohranjanju pokrajine ter poudarja, da bi morala biti sredstva iz tega ukrepa usmerjena k doseganju teh ciljev;
Recognises that because of their unique position less-favoured areas have an important role to play in delivering environmental benefits and in maintaining the landscape and stresses that payments under this measure should seek to achieve these goals;
poudarja, da člen 158 Pogodbe ES o kohezijski politiki, kot je spremenjen v Lizbonski pogodbi, posveča posebno pozornost regijam z naravnimi omejitvami; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi celostno strategijo za odpravo razlik med državami članicami pri obravnavi teh področij in za spodbujanje enotne strategije, ki upošteva posamezne nacionalne in regionalne posebnosti;
Stresses that Article 158 of the TEC on the cohesion policy, as reformed in Lisbon, pays particular attention to regions with natural handicaps; urges the Commission to devise a comprehensive strategy to eliminate the disparities between Member States in dealing with these areas and promote an integrated strategy that takes account of specific national and regional characteristics;
poudarja, da je namen podpore za območja z omejenimi možnostmi ravno ta, da se za vse področje trajno zagotovi učinkovita in večfunkcionalna oblika kmetijstva in tako ohrani podeželje kot bistven gospodarski in življenjski prostor;
Emphasises that support for areas with natural handicaps is aimed in particular at ensuring that an efficient and multifunctional form of agriculture is widely and permanently preserved, thereby maintaining the countryside as a vital economic area and place to live in;
poudarja, da gospodarjenje na območjih z omejenimi možnostmi ni potrebno le zaradi pridelave kakovostnih živil, ampak prispeva tudi k splošnemu gospodarskemu razvoju, izboljšanju kakovosti življenja ter demografski in socialni stabilnosti na teh območjih;
Stresses the need to manage these less favoured areas not only with a view to producing nutritious foodstuffs, but also as a contribution to overall economic development, increased quality of life and demographic and social stability in these areas;
v tem smislu poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva tudi socialni vpliv nove razvrstitve območij z naravnimi omejitvami;
In this sense, calls on the Commission to take into account also the social implications of the new classification for areas with natural handicaps;
opozarja, da za nadomestila za regije z omejenimi možnostmi za razliko od kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov ne bi smeli veljati posebni dodatni pogoji glede načina obdelovanja zemlje, ki bi presegali zahteve navzkrižne skladnosti; opozarja, da mora shema nadomestil za območja z omejenimi možnostmi načeloma ponujati nadomestila kmetom, ki obdelujejo tudi zemljišča z znatnimi naravnimi omejitvami, vendar se jim ta vložek na trgu kot takšnem ne povrne;
Points out that, in contrast to agri-environmental measures, compensatory payments for less-favoured areas must not be subject to additional specific conditions regarding the method of land management which would go beyond cross-compliance requirements; recalls that the LFA scheme must in principle offer compensation to farmers who are also land managers operating with significant natural handicaps which the market does not compensate for as such;
poudarja pa, da morajo biti nadomestila za območja z omejenimi možnostmi vezana na aktivno obdelovanje zemlje, tj. na proizvodnjo hrane ali dejavnosti, ki so z njo tesno povezane;
Emphasises, however, that LFA payments must be linked to active farming of the land, i.e. the production of food or activities intimately related to the production of food;
meni, da bi bilo osem biofizikalnih meril, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, načeloma lahko do neke mere ustreznih za razmejevanje območij z naravnimi omejitvami; vendar poudarja, da jih ni mogoče v vseh primerih uporabiti za objektivno razmejitev teh območij;
Takes the view that the eight biophysical criteria proposed by the Commission could, in principle, be suitable for delimiting areas with natural handicaps to a degree; stresses, however, that the criteria may not be used in all cases for objectively delimiting areas with natural handicaps;
vendar ugotavlja, da zgolj in samo biofizikalna merila mogoče ne bodo primerna za vsa območja v Evropi in bi lahko privedla do neželenih posledic glede upravičenosti posameznih področij; zato priporoča, da se ponovno na povsem objektivni osnovi preučijo socialno-ekonomska merila, kot so oddaljenost od trgov, pomanjkanje storitev in odseljevanje;
Recognises, however, that strict and purely biophysical criteria may not be suitable for all areas of Europe, and may lead to unintended consequences in terms of areas which qualify; therefore recommends that the case for socio-economic criteria such as distance from markets, lack of services and depopulation be re-examined, on a purely objective basis;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva vsa stališča o opredelitvi območij z naravnimi omejitvami, ki so bila izražena med posvetovanjem z državami članicami, regionalnimi in lokalnimi oblastmi ter kmetijskimi organizacijami;
Urges the Commission to take into account all the standpoints expressed during the consultation with the Member States, regional and local authorities and farming organisations, regarding the definition of areas with natural handicaps;
zlasti bi se z vključitvijo zemljepisnega merila „izoliranost“ upoštevale posebne naravne omejitve, ki izhajajo iz oddaljenosti od trga, odročnosti in omejenega dostopa do storitev;
Considers, in particular, that the inclusion of a geographical criterion referred to as ‘isolation’ would address the specific natural handicap stemming from distance from the market, remoteness and limited access to services;
meni, da je treba ponovno opredeliti merilo za ravnovesje vlažnosti tal tako, da se upoštevajo različni kmetijski in podnebni pogoji v različnih državah članicah Unije;
Considers it necessary to review the definition of the criterion of ‘soil moisture balance’ so as take account of the different agro-climatic conditions which exist in the various Member States of the Union;
za priznavanje omejenih možnosti rabe vlažnih tal, ki jih ni mogoče obdelovati, bi vključitev merila „dni za obdelavo tal“ omogočila, da se upošteva medsebojni vpliv vrste tal in podnebja (da pride na primer težavnost primorskega podnebja ustrezno do izraza);
Notes that, to acknowledge the limitations of wet unworkable soils, the inclusion of a ‘field capacity days’ criterion would allow the interaction between soil types and climate to be taken into account (for instance to adequately reflect maritime climate difficulties);
zato poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje z raziskavami in analizami za vključitev morebitnih dodatnih meril v novo shemo nadomestil za območja z omejenimi možnostmi, da bodo njeni predlogi še bolj prilagojeni praktičnim težavam kmetov in bo oblikovala celovit skupek meril, ki bodo dolgoročno primerna;
Asks the Commission, therefore, to pursue its research efforts and analysis with a view to including potential additional criteria in the new LFA scheme in order to further adapt its proposals to practical difficulties farmers are facing and build a robust set of criteria which will remain suitable in the long term;