natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Na Švedskem se na odločitev o zavrnitvi prošnje za izdajo dovoljenja za prebivanje ni možno pritožiti, zaradi česar državljani ne morejo uveljavljati osnovne pravice do poprave krivic.
In Sweden, decisions to reject the application for a residence card are not subject to review and thus citizens are deprived of basic redress rights.
Nizozemski državljani, ki živijo v tujini, imajo težave pri podaljšanju potnih listin.
Dutch nationals living abroad experience difficulties in having their travel documents renewed.
Državljani imajo pogosto težave pri dostopu do pravic iz socialne varnosti, zlasti zaradi tega, ker je ustrezna zakonodaja zapletena in težko razumljiva, pristojni organi pa jo včasih neustrezno uporabljajo.
Citizens often have difficulties accessing social security entitlements especially because the relevant legislation is complex, difficult to understand and sometimes incorrectly applied by the relevant authorities.
Državljani pogosto ne izpolnijo pravih obrazcev ali zamudijo roke za predložitev ustrezne dokumentacije, ker niso bili ustrezno obveščeni ali niso dobili potrebnih napotkov, preden so zapustili matične države.
They frequently do not fill in the right forms or miss the deadlines for submitting the appropriate documentation because they have not been properly informed or they have not found the necessary instructions before leaving their home countries.
Veliko prejetih peticij so poslali državljani Združenega kraljestva, ki prebivajo v drugi državi EU in ki jim vlada Združenega kraljestva ni odobrila dodatkov, kot je nadomestilo za invalidne osebe, dodatek za pomoč in postrežbo ali dodatek za negovalca, kljub temu da je Sodišče Evropske unije te dodatke uvrstilo med izvozljiva denarna nadomestila za primer bolezni
Several petitions were received by UK citizens resident in another EU country concerning the refusal by the UK Government to grant them benefits such as Disability Living Allowance, Attendance Allowance or Carer’s Allowance, despite the fact that the Court of Justice of the European Union had classified them as exportable sickness benefits in cash
Zadeva C-299/05 z dne 18.10.2007. .
Case C-299/05 of 18.10.2007. .
Primer, ki ga je vložila britanska predlagateljica peticije
A case brought forward by a petitioner
Peticija 0876/2008 Lucy Jane Marie Stewart (Britanka), ki prebiva v državi članici EU, katere ni državljanka, o pravici do invalidske pokojnine. , je postal predmet zahteve za predhodno odločanje, na podlagi katere je Sodišče Evropske unije julija 2011 izreklo temeljno sodbo (C-503/09).
Petition 0876/2008 by Miss Lucy Jane Marie Stewart (British), on her right to incapacity pension when residing in another EU member state than the one she is a national of. was also the subject of a request for a preliminary ruling, which resulted in a land mark ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (C-503/09), delivered in July 2011.
V sodbi je navedeno, da je mogoče tak preskus pretekle prisotnosti zahtevati le, če ne obstaja druga ustrezna povezava s sistemom socialnega varstva Združenega kraljestva.
The ruling stated that such a past presence test can only be imposed in the absence of some other proper linking to the UK’s social security system.
Sodišče je zelo poudarilo pojem državljanstva in z njim povezane pravice.
The Court of Justice laid great emphasis on the concept of citizenship and on the rights attached thereto.
Opozorilo je, da ne bi bilo združljivo s pravicami državljanov, če bi bili državljani matične države članice obravnavani manj ugodno, kot bi bili, če ne bi izkoristili priložnosti, ki jim jih zagotavljata Pogodbi.
It underscored that it would be incompatible with the citizenship rights if citizens were to receive in the Member State of which they are nationals treatment less favourable than that which they would enjoy if they had not availed themselves of the opportunities offered by the Treaties.
Odbor za peticije to peticijo odločno podpira, že odkar jo je prejel leta 2008, ter v zvezi z njo sodeluje v konstruktivnem dialogu s pristojnimi britanskimi organi in Evropsko komisijo.
The Committee on Petitions has strongly supported the petition since its receipt in 2008 and has engaged in a constructive dialogue with the competent British authorities and the European Commission on this issue.
Novembra 2009 sta predlagateljica peticije in njena družina dobili priložnost, da se udeležita seje odbora in primer obrazložita pred člani odbora in uradnimi predstavniki Evropske komisije.
In November 2009 the petitioner and her family had the opportunity to attend a committee meeting and fully explain her case before Members of the Committee and representative officials of the European Commission.
Predpisi prav tako ne obravnavajo pravic v skladu s členom 18 PDEU.
The rules also fail to deal with rights under Article 18 TFEU.
To je zapleteno vprašanje, vendar je iz sodb Sodišča Evropske unije jasno, da mora biti oseba, ki je imela v preteklosti pravico do prebivanja v določeni državi članici, pri dostopanju do dodatkov enako obravnavana kot državljani te države članice.
This is a complicated area, but it is clear from ECJ judgments that a person who had a right of residence in a Member State in the past should receive equal treatment with nationals of that Member State in terms of access to benefits.
Predlagatelji peticij so opisovali tudi težave, povezane s priznavanjem diplom ali kvalifikacij, v nekaterih primerih pa tudi težave v zvezi z nepopolnim prenosom ali izvajanjem Direktive 2005/36/ES
Petitioners have also given an account of problems related to the recognition of their diplomas or qualifications and sometimes of poor transposition or implementation of Directive 2005/36/EC
Direktiva 2005/36/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij. .
Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the recognition of professional qualifications. .
Zdi se, da pristojni organi ne poznajo dobro kodeksa ravnanja, ki je nastal za izvajanje Direktive 2005/36/ES, ali ga ne upoštevajo ustrezno.
The Code of Conduct created for the application of Directive 2005/36/EC appears to not be well known or properly observed by competent authorities.
V nekaterih primerih so organi od prosilcev zahtevali dodatne dokumente ob tistih, navedenih v prilogah, ali pa so izvajali nesorazmerna jezikovna preverjanja.
In certain cases, the authorities requested applicants to submit additional documents to the ones mentioned in the annexes or imposed disproportionate language tests.
V več državah so bile ugotovljene zamude pri prenosu te direktive.
Delays in transposition of the Directive were denounced in several countries.
Farmacevti s kvalifikacijami iz druge države članice so se pritožili, da jim je bil zavrnjen dostop do upravljanja novih lekarn v Združenem kraljestvu zaradi omejevalne razlage člena 21(4) direktive.
Pharmacists with qualifications from another Member State complained against being refused access to the management of new pharmacies in the United Kingdom, due to a restrictive interpretation of Article 21 (4) of the Directive.
Težava je bila uspešno rešena v drugi polovici leta 2011.
The case was successfully settled during the second half of the year 2011.
Zelo številni pristojni organi na nacionalni ali lokalni ravni ustvarjajo zmedo glede tega, kateri je ustrezni organ, na katerega se morajo obrniti predlagatelji peticije.
The plethora of competent authorities, at national or local level creates confusion about the appropriate organism to which petitioners should address themselves.
Odvračilni učinek imajo tudi dolgotrajni postopki in birokracija.
Lengthy procedures and red tape also can also act as deterrents.
Očitno diskriminacijo na podlagi državljanstva so ob številnih priložnostih izkusili učitelji tujih jezikov („ lettori “) v Italiji, ki se že več desetletij borijo proti diskriminatornemu ravnanju v zvezi s stalno zaposlitvijo, napredovanjem, pokojninami in socialno varnostjo.
Blatant discrimination on grounds of nationality was revealed on numerous occasions in the case of foreign language teachers (‘lettori’) in Italy, who have been struggling for decades against discriminatory treatment with respect to security of tenure, career development, pensions and social security.
Predlagatelji peticij so izrazili zaskrbljenost glede ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo invalidi pri uresničevanju pravice do prostega gibanja, na primer zaradi neustrezne prometne infrastrukture.
Petitioners have expressed concerns about the obstacles faced by people with disabilities when they exercise their right to free movement, such as the lack of appropriate transport facilities.
Težave na področju družinskega prava so se pojavile predvsem v zvezi s skrbništvom nad otroki v primeru razveze zakonske zveze ali priznavanjem zvez, registriranih v drugi državi članici.
Problems in the field of family law were revealed mainly with respect to child custody in case of divorce or recognition of partnerships registered in another Member State.
V zvezi s čezmejnimi razvezami so se predlagatelji peticij pritoževali predvsem nad ogromnimi stroški, dolgotrajnimi postopki ter pomanjkanjem ustreznih informacij o veljavnih zakonih in sodni pristojnosti.
Regarding trans-border divorces, petitioners primarily complained about the enormous costs involved, protracted proceedings, the lack of adequate information on applicable laws and jurisdictions.
Mnogo peticij je povezanih s težavami zaradi nepriznavanja listin o osebnem stanju.
Several petitions illustrate problems related to the non-recognition of civil status documents.
Postopki za priznanje listin so lahko izredno dolgotrajni in povezani z zelo visokimi stroški, zlasti s stroški prevoda ali overitve.
Procedures for the recognition of documents can be extremely time-consuming and involve many costs, especially linked to translation or authentication.
Nekateri predlagatelji peticij so poročali o težavah v zvezi z jezikovnim prenosom svojih imen glede na kulturo države, v katero so se preselili.
Some petitioners reported problems regarding the linguistic transposition of their names according to the culture of the country they moved to.
Drugi so se pritožili nad težavami pri registraciji novorojenih otrok v novi državi prebivališča.
Others complained about the difficulties they encountered when trying to register their newly born children in their new state of residence.
Izkazalo se je, da poljske oblasti zavračajo izdajo listin o osebnem stanju osebam, ki si želijo ustvariti istospolno partnerstvo ali se želijo poročiti z istospolnim partnerjem v drugi državi članici.
It was revealed that Polish authorities refuse to issue certificates of civil status to persons who intend to engage in a same-sex partnership or marriage in another Member State.
Hudih kritik so bili deležni množični izgoni na podlagi etnične ali narodne pripadnosti, kot eden od vzrokov za te težave pa je bilo poudarjeno zlasti pomanjkanje nacionalnih strategij vključevanja Romov.
Mass expulsions on the basis of ethnic or national origin have been heavily criticised and especially the lack of the National Roma Integration Strategies has been pointed out as one of the causes of the problem.
Nazadnje se poročilo osredotoča na pomen neformalnih mrež za reševanje težav (Solvit, portal Tvoja Evropa itd.) in okrepljene komunikacijske politike, ki morajo državljanom zagotavljati celovito uživanje pravic, določenih v Pogodbah.
The report puts the focus on the importance of informal problem-solving networks (Solvit, the ‘Your Europe’ website) and an enhanced communication policy, which should aim at ensuring that citizens fully enjoy their rights laid out in the Treaties.
Čeprav so pravice državljanov jasno določene v pravnih aktih EU, se v praksi vedno ne izvršujejo.
Although citizens’ rights are clearly enshrined in the EU legal acts, they are not always upheld in practice.
Zato veliko ljudi ni navdušenih nad evropskim projektom.
Therefore many people feel disenchanted with the European project.
Odbor za peticije skuša odpraviti te pomanjkljivosti tako, da postavlja državljane v središče svojih dejavnosti.
The Committee on Petitions attempts to rectify these shortcomings by placing citizens at the heart of its activities.
Da bi v celoti izkoristil svoj politični vpliv, se vključuje v neposreden dialog z nacionalnimi ali regionalnimi organi držav članic ter skuša poiskati hitre in zunajsodne rešitve za ugotovljene težave.
Turning to good account its political influence, it enters into direct dialogue with national or regional authorities in the Member States concerned and tries to find quick, non-judicial remedies to the issues raised with it.
V primerih domneve o hudih kršitev evropskega prava, ki zahtevajo nadaljnjo obravnavo Sodišča Evropske unije, odbor tesno sodeluje z Evropsko komisijo pri sprožitvi postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev.
In instances bringing forward allegations of serious infringements of European law, which merit further consideration by the Court of Justice of the European Union, the PETI Committee closely cooperates with the European Commission for the initiation of infringement proceedings.
Tako se pravice državljanov stalno spodbujajo in varujejo prek postopka vlaganja peticij.
Consequently, citizens’ rights are constantly promoted and secured through the petitions process.
o Poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010: Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU
on the EU Citizenship Report 2010: Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
Odbor za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov poziva Odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker sta Poročilo o državljanstvu EU (COM(2010)603) in sporočilo K aktu za enotni trg (COM(2010)608) pobudi, ki se dopolnjujeta ter postavljata državljane v središče enotnega trga in pomagata presegati sedanjo razdrobljenost EU;
A. whereas the EU Citizenship Report COM(2010)603 and the Single Market Act Communication COM(2010)608 are complementary initiatives which place citizens at the heart of the Single Market and help to overcome the present fragmentation of the EU;
B. ker sta sedanja gospodarska recesija in ponoven pojav protekcionizma gospodarstva v državah članicah ogrozila nekatere od najvidnejših dosežkov procesa evropskega povezovanja; ker bi moral predlog Komisije, da se leto 2013 razglasi za evropsko leto državljanov, obravnavati družbeno-gospodarske težave EU in spodbujati oblikovanje trga, ki služi državljanom;
B. whereas the current economic downspin and the re-emergence of protectionist economic attitudes in Member States have threatened some of the most visible achievements of the European Integration process; whereas the Commission proposal to make 2013 the ‘European Year for Citizens’ should address the EU’s socio-economic problems and should work towards a market that is at the service of citizens;
C. ker opozarja na duh svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010
C. recalling the spirit of its Resolution of 20 May 2010
P7_TA(2010)0186 o uresničitvi enotnega trga za potrošnike in državljane in podpira poročilo Maria Montija, v katerem se zavzema za pristop, ki bo temeljil na državljanih in pri katerem bodo pomisleki državljanov in potrošnikov v celoti vključeni v razvoj enotnega trga, kar bo državljanom EU dalo moč, konceptu državljanstva EU pa nov politični zagon;
P7_TA(2010)0186 . on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens, and endorsing the Monti report, which champions a citizen-based approach whereby citizens’ and consumers’ concerns are fully integrated in the Single Market’s development, empowering EU citizens and giving new political impetus to the concept of EU citizenship;
D. ob upoštevanju izida prvega foruma o enotnem trgu, ki je potekal v Krakovu 3. in 4. oktobra 2011, ter zlasti deklaracije iz Krakova, v kateri so navedene ovire, s katerimi se v vsakdanjem življenju soočajo državljani, in ukrepi, ki so potrebni za odpravo teh ovir;
D. having regard to the outcome of the first Single Market Forum, which was held in Kraków on 3 and 4 October 2011, and in particular to the Kraków Declaration, which highlighted the obstacles that citizens face in their day‑to‑day lives and the steps that need to be taken in order to remove those obstacles;
3. poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja člen 174 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti v zvezi z otoškimi in gorskimi regijami, katerih prebivalci nimajo enakega dostopa do zdravstva, dela in izobraževanja kot državljani, ki živijo v velikih mestih; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja za uvedbo širokopasovnih povezav v otoških in gorskih regijah ter izvaja vse potrebne politike za zagotavljanje dostopa do pravic, da se prebivalci iz teh regij ne bi več odseljevali;
Calls on the Commission to put into effect Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, particularly as regards island and mountain regions, whose inhabitants do not have the same access to health, work and education as citizens living in big towns and cities; urges the Commission to make greater efforts to ensure that broadband is introduced in island and mountain regions and to implement all the policies required, in terms of access to rights, to avert the depopulation of these regions;
5. opozarja, kako pomembna je prenosljivost pokojnin med državami članicami EU, pri čemer so še vedno velike ovire, to pa državljane odvrača od uveljavljanja pravice do prostega gibanja;
Recalls the importance of portability of pensions across EU Member States, the lack of which remains a significant obstacle which discourages citizens from exercising their right to free movement;
8. se zaveda jezikovnih ovir, s katerimi se državljani, ki se želijo prosto gibati v Evropski uniji, soočajo pred nacionalnimi sodišči, institucijami in upravami; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga oprijemljive in hitre rešitve, da bi lahko državljani premagali to pomembno oviro, vendar naj organom držav članic ne naloži prevelikega bremena;
Recognises the language difficulties faced by citizens in dealing with national courts, institutions and administrations when moving freely within the European Union; calls on the Commission to offer tangible and expedient solutions to help citizens overcome this significant obstacle, without placing a heavy burden on the Member State authorities;
Direktiva 2011/24/EU opredeljuje pravila za boljši dostop do varnih in visoko kakovostnih storitev čezmejnega zdravstvenega varstva ter spodbuja sodelovanje med državami članicami na področju zdravstvenega varstva.
Directive 2011/24/EU provides rules for facilitating access to safe, high-quality cross-border healthcare and promotes cooperation on healthcare between Member States.
12. ugotavlja, da imajo državljani, ki so deležni zdravstvene oskrbe v tujini, največ težav zaradi nezadostnega poznavanja svojih pravic in načinov uveljavljanja teh pravic; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj državljane EU bolje obveščajo o teh pravicah, vključno s praktičnimi vidiki uveljavljanja teh pravic, zlasti kar zadeva povračilo stroškov;
Notes that one of the main causes of frustration for citizens receiving health care abroad is that they are not sufficiently aware of their rights and the means available for enforcing them; calls on the Commission and the Member States to inform EU citizens better about these rights, including the practical aspects of their exercise, in particular with regard to reimbursement of costs;
14. meni, da bi morala Komisija potem, ko je opredelila težave v zvezi z enotnim trgom, zdaj storiti naslednji logični korak ter utrditi in poiskati načine za učinkovito izvajanje enotnega trga, da bi ponovno pridobili podporo evropskih državljanov; pozdravlja delo Komisije v zvezi z „20 glavnimi problemi“, opredeljenimi na podlagi resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010
Believes that, having identified the problems related to the Single Market, the Commission should move into the next logical phase of consolidating and finding ways to implement effectively the Single Market in order to regain the support of European citizens; welcomes the Commission’s work on the ‘The 20 main concerns’, which stemmed from the resolution of 20 May 2010
P7_TA(2010)0186 (Grechovo poročilo). , saj gre za koristen prvi korak; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi „najboljših 20 glavnih rešitev“ za vsako od teh težav, kot je bilo predlagano na forumu o enotnem trgu v Krakovu;
P7_TA(2010)0186 (Grech Report). , as a useful first step; calls on the Commission to bring forward the ‘Top 20 main Solutions’, as proposed at the Krakow Single Market Forum, to each of these sources of frustration;
18. pozdravlja prizadevanje in odločnost Komisije za izvajanje Akta za enotni trg; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi učinkovito izvajanje glavnih prednostnih nalog in obenem razvije drug sveženj pobud, ki se bodo izvajale v prihodnosti;
Welcomes the Commission’s work and commitment to the implementation of the Single Market Act; urges the Commission to ensure effective implementation of the main priorities, whilst developing a second set of initiatives for future implementation;
21. spodbuja Komisijo, naj čim prej sprejme akcijski načrt za dodatno krepitev vloge mreže SOLVIT, svetovalne storitve Tvoja Evropa in evropskih potrošniških centrov ter drugih pomožnih služb, da bodo bolj prepoznavne za državljane in podjetja;
Encourages the Commission to adopt without delay an Action Plan to further reinforce and strengthen the role of SOLVIT, Your Europe Advice and the European Consumers’ Centres, among others assistance services, in order to make them more visible to citizens and businesses;
23. od držav članic zahteva dodatne ukrepe, usklajene s Komisijo, za odpravo ovir, ki državljanom onemogočajo dostop do spletnih storitev; je v zvezi s tem seznanjen s predlogom Komisije o evropskem pogodbenem pravu;
Demands further action from the Member States in coordination with the Commission to overcome hurdles preventing citizens from having access to online services; notes, in this regard, the Commission proposal on a European Contract Law;
Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Cornelis de Jong, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Róża, grofica Thun Und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Adam Bielan, Cristian Silviu Buşoi, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Cornelis de Jong, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Simon Busuttil, Frank Engel, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Anna Hedh, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Emma McClarkin, Olle Schmidt, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides)
Simon Busuttil, Frank Engel, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Anna Hedh, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Emma McClarkin, Olle Schmidt, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides
o poročilu o državljanstvu EU za leto 2010: odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU
on the EU Citizenship Report 2010: dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje poziva Odbor za peticije kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Culture and Education calls on the Committee on Petitions, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution: