natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zlasti države članice, ki so pogodbenice Haaške konvencije z dne 5. oktobra 1961 o koliziji zakonov glede oblike oporočnih razpolaganj, še naprej uporabljajo določbe te konvencije namesto člena 19d te uredbe, kar zadeva formalno veljavnost oporok in skupnih oporok.
In particular, the Member States which are Contracting Parties to the Hague Convention of 5 October 1961 on the Conflicts of Laws to the Form of Testamentary Dispositions shall continue to apply the provisions of that Convention instead of Article 19d of this Regulation with regard to the formal validity of wills and joint wills.
Ne glede na odstavek 1 ima ta uredba v odnosih med državami članicami prednost pred konvencijami, sklenjenimi izključno med dvema ali več državami članicami, kolikor se te konvencije nanašajo na zadeve , ki so urejene s to uredbo ▌
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, this Regulation shall , as between Member States, take precedence ▌ over conventions concluded exclusively between two or more of them in so far as such conventions concern matters governed by this Regulation ▌ .
Ta uredba ne preprečuje uporabe konvencije med Dansko, Finsko, Islandijo, Norveško in Švedsko z dne 19. novembra 1934, ki vsebuje določbe mednarodnega zasebnega prava o dedovanju, oporokah in upravljanju zapuščine, kot so jo z medvladnim sporazumom med temi državami z dne [datum] 2012 spremenile države članice pogodbenice te konvencije, v kolikor določa:
This Regulation shall not preclude the application of the Convention of 19 November 1934 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on succession, wills and estate administration, as revised by the intergovernmental agreement between those States of [date] 2012, by the Member States which are parties thereto, in so far as it provides for:
(a) pravila o postopkovnih vidikih upravljanja zapuščine, kot je opredeljeno v konvenciji, in tozadevno pomoč organov držav pogodbenic konvencije ter
(a) rules on the procedural aspects of estate administration as defined by the Convention and assistance in this regard by the authorities of the States Contracting Parties to the Convention, and
(b) enostavnejše in hitrejše postopke za priznanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb v dednih zadevah.
(b) simplified and more expeditious procedures for the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of succession.
Člen 45a Razmerje do Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000
Article 45a Relations with Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000
Ta uredba ne vpliva na uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1346/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o postopkih v primeru insolventnosti
This Regulation shall not affect the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings
Člen 46 Informacije, ki so na voljo javnosti
Article 46 Information made available to the public
Države članice pošljejo Komisiji kratek opis nacionalnega prava in postopkov v zvezi z dednim pravom, vključno z informacijami o tem, kateri organi so pristojni za dedne zadeve in kateri za sprejemanje izjav o sprejemu dediščine, volila ali nujnega deleža ali odpovedi dediščini, volilu ali nujnemu deležu v skladu s členom 8, zato da bi se dale te informacije na voljo javnosti v okviru Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah.
The Member States shall, with a view to making the information available to the public within the framework of the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters, provide the Commission with a short summary of their national legislation and procedures relating to ▌ succession, including information on the type of authority which has competence in matters of succession and information on the type of authority competent to receive declarations of acceptance or waiver of the succession, a legacy or a reserved share under Article 8.
Države članice pošljejo tudi sezname z vsemi dokumenti ali podatki, običajno potrebnimi za vpis nepremičnin, ki so na njihovem ozemlju.
The Member States shall also provide fact sheets listing all the documents or information usually required for the purposes of registration of immovable property located on their territory.
Države članice informacije nenehno posodabljajo .
The Member States shall keep the information updated permanently .
Obveščanje o kontaktnih podatkih in postopkih
Information on contact details and procedures
UL: Devet mesecev pred začetkom uporabe uredbe. sporočijo:
OJ: 9 months before the date of application of the Regulation. , the Member States shall communicate to the Commission:
(a) imena in kontaktne podatke sodišč ali organov, ki so pristojni za obravnavanje zahtev za razglasitev izvršljivosti v skladu s členom 33b(1) in za obravnavanje pravnih sredstev zoper sodne odločbe o takšnih zahtevah v skladu s členom 33g(2);
(a) the names and contact details of the courts or authorities with competence to deal with applications for a declaration of enforceability in accordance with Article 33b(1) and with appeals against decisions on such applications in accordance with Article 33g(2);
(b) pravna sredstva iz člena 33h;
(b) the redress procedures referred to in Article 33h;
(c) ustrezne podatke o organih, ki so v skladu s členom 37 pristojni za izdajo potrdila; ter
(c) the relevant information regarding the authorities competent to issue the Certificate pursuant to Article 37 ; and
(d) pravna sredstva iz člena 44.
(d) the redress procedures referred to in Article 44.
Države članice obveščajo Komisijo o naknadnih spremembah teh podatkov.
The Member States shall apprise the Commission of any subsequent changes to this information.
Komisija objavi podatke, sporočene v skladu z odstavkom 1, v Uradnem listu Evropske unije, razen naslovov in drugih kontaktnih podatkov sodišč in organov iz točke (a).
The Commission shall publish the information communicated in accordance with paragraph 1 in the Official Journal of the European Union , with the exception of the addresses and other contact details of the courts and authorities referred to in point (a).
Komisija tudi na vsak drug ustrezen način, zlasti prek Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, omogoči, da so vsi podatki, sporočeni v skladu z odstavkom 1, na voljo javnosti.
The Commission shall make all information communicated in accordance with paragraph 1 publicly available through any other appropriate means, in particular through the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters.
Sestava in kasnejše spreminjanje seznama iz člena 2(2)
Establishment and subsequent amendment of the list referred to in Article 2(2)
Komisija na podlagi uradnih obvestil držav članic sestavi seznam drugih organov in poklicnih pravnikov iz člena 2(2).
The Commission shall, on the basis of the notifications by the Member States, establish the list of other authorities and legal professionals referred to in Article 2(2) .
Države članice obvestijo Komisijo o naknadnih spremembah seznama.
The Member States shall notify the Commission of any subsequent amendments to that list.
Komisija seznam ustrezno spremeni.
The Commission shall amend the list accordingly.
Komisija seznam in morebitne naknadne spremembe objavi v Uradnem listu Evropske unije.
The Commission shall publish the list and any subsequent amendments in the Official Journal of the European Union .
Komisija tudi na vsak drug ustrezen način, zlasti prek Evropske pravosodne mreže v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, omogoči, da so vsi podatki, sporočeni v skladu z odstavkoma 1 in 2, na voljo javnosti.
The Commission shall make all information communicated in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 publicly available through any other appropriate means, in particular through the European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters.
Sestava in kasnejše spreminjanje dokazil in obrazcev iz členov 33c, 34, 35, 35a, 38 in 40a
Establishment and subsequent amendment of the attestations and the forms referred to in Articles 33c, 34, 35, 35a, 38 and 40a
Komisija sprejme izvedbene akte, s katerimi sprejme in kasneje spreminja dokazila in obrazce iz členov 33c, 34, 35, 35a, 38 in 40a.
The Commission shall adopt implementing acts establishing and subsequently amending the attestations and forms referred to in Articles 33c, 34, 35, 35a, 38 and 40a.
Ta izvedbena pravila se sprejmejo v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 48(2).
Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Člen 48Postopek v odboru
Article 48Committee procedure
Komisiji pomaga odbor.
The Commission shall be assisted by a committee .
Člen 49 Pregled▌
Article 49Review▌
Poročilu se po potrebi priložijo predlogi sprememb.
The report shall be accompanied, where appropriate, by proposals for amendments.
Člen 50Prehodne določbe
Article 50Transitional provisions
Ta uredba se uporablja za dedovanje po osebah, umrlih ob ali po začetku njene uporabe.
This Regulation shall apply to the succession of persons deceased on or after its date of application
Če je pokojnik pred začetkom uporabe te uredbe izbral pravo, ki se uporablja za njegovo zapuščino, se ta določitev ▌šteje za veljavno, če izpolnjuje pogoje iz poglavja III ali če je bila veljavna po veljavnih pravilih mednarodnega zasebnega prava v času izbire v državi, v kateri je imel pokojnik običajno prebivališče, ali v kateri koli drugi državi, katere državljanstvo je imel.
Where the deceased had chosen the law applicable to his succession prior to the date of application of this Regulation, that choice shall be ▌valid if it meets the conditions laid down in Chapter III or if it is valid in application of the rules of private international law in force, at the time the choice was made, in the State in which the deceased had his habitual residence or in any of the States whose nationality he possessed.
Razpolaganje s premoženjem za primer smrti, napravljeno pred začetkom uporabe te uredbe, je materialno in formalno dopustno in veljavno, če izpolnjuje pogoje iz poglavja III ali če je bilo materialno in formalno dopustno in veljavno po veljavnih pravilih mednarodnega zasebnega prava v času, ko je bilo razpolaganje s premoženjem napravljeno, v državi, v kateri je imel zapustnik običajno prebivališče, ali v kateri koli drugi državi, katere državljanstvo je imel, ali v kateri koli drugi državi, kjer se vodi zapuščinski postopek.
A disposition of property upon death made prior to the date of application of this Regulation shall be admissible and valid in substantive terms and as regards form if it meets the conditions laid down in Chapter III or if it is admissible and valid in substantive terms and as regards form in application of the rules of private international law in force, at the time the disposition was made, in the State in which the deceased had his habitual residence or in any of the States whose nationality he possessed or in the Member State of the authority dealing with the succession.
Če je bilo razpolaganje s premoženjem za primer smrti sestavljeno pred dnem začetka uporabe te uredbe v skladu s pravom, ki ga je pokojnik lahko izbral v skladu s to uredbo, se to pravo šteje kot izbira za obravnavanje zapuščinske zadeve. ▌
If a disposition of property upon death was made prior to the date of application of this Regulation in accordance with the law which the deceased could have chosen in accordance with this Regulation, that law shall be deemed to have been chosen as the law applicable to the succession. ▌
Člen 51 Začetek veljavnosti
Article 51 Entry into force
Uporablja se od […]
It shall apply from […]
UL: Šestintrideset mesecev po začetku veljavnosti uredbe. , razen členov 46 in 46a, ki se uporabljata od […]
OJ: 36 months after the date of entry into force of the Regulation. , except for Articles 46 and 46a which shall apply from […]
UL: Devet mesecev pred začetkom uporabe uredbe. , in členov 47, 47a in 48, ki se uporabljajo od […]
OJ: 9 months before the date of application of the Regulation. and Articles 47, 47a and 48 which shall apply from […]
UL: Dan po sprejetju uredbe. .
OJ: The day following the date of adoption of the Regulation.
Ta uredba je v celoti zavezujoča in se neposredno uporablja v vseh državah članicah v skladu s Pogodbama .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all the Member States in accordance with the Treaties .
Enotna povezovalna merila za sodno pristojnost in veljavno pravo so v središču evropskih rešitev.
Uniform connecting factors for determining court competence and applicable law are the nub of a European solution.
V predlogu Komisije je pri obeh odločilni dejavnik običajno prebivališče.
In the Commission proposal, habitual residence is the determining factor for both.
S tem pa je povezana pravica pokojnika do izbire prava svoje države kot dednega prava, skupaj z možnostjo, da se primer lahko prenese na sodišče iz domače države.
One essential feature of this, however, is the right of testators to be able to choose their home country's law as the law governing their succession, in conjunction with the possibility of referral to a court in their home country.
Predlog je treba oceniti v luči te povezave.
The proposal has to be assessed in the light of that linkage.
Vsaka rešitev ima svoje prednosti in slabosti.
Every solution has its strong points and weak points.
Vedno bodo obstajala sosledja dogodkov, katerih rezultat ni popolnoma zadovoljujoč.
There will always be sequences of events whose outcome is not totally satisfactory.
Takšna je narava tega vprašanja: zahtevna snov, različnost življenjskih okoliščin in različna mnenja z nasprotujočimi si cilji.
This is quintessentially so: it is a difficult field; personal circumstances differ; and differing judgments result in conflicting objectives.
Ocena mora upoštevati vse vidike.
An assessment must take in all factors.
Osnovne odločitve predloga Komisije je zaradi tega treba podpreti.
The basic policy line in the Commission proposal should therefore be endorsed.
V osnovi ustrezajo tudi stališču Evropskega parlamenta o zeleni knjigi
Essentially, furthermore, it is in line with Parliament's opinion on the Green Paper
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. novembra 2006 s priporočili Komisiji o dedovanju in oporokah (UL C 314 E, 21.12.2006, str.
European Parliament resolution with recommendations to the Commission on succession and wills (OJ C 314 E, 21.12.2006, p.
Predlog ustvarja pravno varnost, je razmeroma jasen in preprost, obravnava najpomembnejših vprašanj pa je razumljiva tudi za laike.
The proposal creates legal certainty, is comparatively clear and straightforward, and, with regard to the key issues it addresses, can also be understood by the man and woman in the street.
Izognil se je razdelitvi zapuščin.
Fragmentation of successions is avoided.
Zaradi povezave z običajnim prebivališčem bo pristojno sodišče praviloma lahko uporabilo domače pravo, in sicer tudi v povezavi z državljani tretjih držav.
Because habitual residence would be the connecting factor, the competent court would be able, as a rule, to apply its own law, including vis-à-vis third-country nationals.
Večinoma bo kraj običajnega prebivališča pokojnika tudi središče njegovih interesov.
In most cases, the place of habitual residence of a testator will also be his or her centre of interests.
Pri izbiri prava se lahko zagotovi usklajenost prek prenosa na sodišče domače države.
Where a particular country's law is chosen, parallelism can be ensured through referral to a court in the home country.
Nova pravica do izbire prava krepi samostojnost državljanov.
The new choice-of-law right would make citizens more autonomous.
Z omejitvijo na državljanstvo je hkrati ohranjen javni red kot lastnost dednega prava, zagotovljeno je varstvo družinskih članov, v veliki meri pa se preprečijo utaje ali zlorabe.
At the same time, restricting it to the law governing nationality would maintain the public policy function of law on succession and safeguards for relatives and, to as great an extent as possible, prevent evasion or abuse.
Državljanstvo je zanesljivo merilo za povezovanje.
Nationality is a reliable connecting factor.
Na tej podlagi je mogoče predvideti priznavanje in izvršbo odločb.
The Commission proposal is rounded off by the establishment of a European Certificate of Succession.
Predlog Komisije temelji na vzpostavitvi evropskega potrdila o dedovanju.
It would not constitute a final, unappealable ruling on a particular succession; rather, it would be a certificate relating to that succession.
Na kratko:
To sum up:
Tudi zapuščinski svetovalci s tem pridobijo zanesljivo osnovo za svoje delovanje.
Advisers on succession would also be given a secure basis on which to operate.
Sodišča ali drugi pristojni organi bi lahko praviloma uporabljali domače pravo.
As a rule, courts or other competent entities would be able to apply their own law.
Reševanje čezmejnih dedovanj bo precej poenostavljeno.
Handling cross-border successions would be made considerably easier.
Za državljane, ki so imeli običajno prebivališče zunaj svoje države in niso izbrali prava, v primeru smrti pogosto velja dedno pravo države prebivanja.
Deceased persons who had been habitually resident outside their home country and who had not made a choice of law would be subject to the law on succession of the country of residence.
To je novost za vse države članice.
That would be new for all Member States.
Glede pomislekov je treba omeniti, da je to pravno stanje že zdaj prisotno v mnogih primerih, ne da bi se državljani tega zavedali.
As far as misgivings are concerned, it should be pointed out that in many instances, without the public being aware of it, this is already the position in law.
Te pomisleke je mogoče odpraviti z informacijskimi kampanjami.
Misgivings can be dispelled through information campaigns.
Vsak pristop ima prednosti in slabosti in ni mogoče naenkrat upoštevati vseh ciljev.
There are benefits and drawbacks to any approach, and not all objectives can be taken account of at the same time.
Poročevalec meni, da je sedanje pravno stanje in kateri koli drug pristop precej bolj problematičen, zato ocenjuje, da je predlagani koncept najbolj zaželen.
The rapporteur takes the view that the current legal position - and any other approach - is significantly more problematic, and therefore regards what is being proposed as preferable.
Uredba ne more rešiti vseh težav in ne bi smela urejati vseh podrobnosti, bo pa precej izboljšala trenutno pravno stanje.
The regulation cannot resolve all problems and should not regulate every detail, but it would considerably improve the present legal position.
Državljani pridobijo jasen in varen temelj za urejanje svoje zapuščine.
Individuals would be given a clear and secure basis for arranging their succession.
Bolje lahko uveljavljajo svoje pravice na notranjem trgu.
They would be able to exercise their rights on the internal market more effectively.
Pravna jasnost in pravna varnost sta osrednji pravni lastnosti prav v dednem pravu.
Legal clarity and legal certainty are central qualities within law on succession in particular.
Uredba te lastnosti krepi, koristi javnosti in prinaša veliko evropsko dodano vrednost.
The regulation would strengthen them, benefit the public and create considerable European added value.
Iz previdnosti je treba omeniti naslednje:
To clarify matters, it should be pointed out that:
1) Pravo, ki se uporablja, ne vpliva na veljavno obdavčevanje dediščin.
(1) the applicable law has no influence on the applicable inheritance tax law;
2) Uredba ureja le mednarodno zasebno pravo, materialno dedno pravo ostaja nespremenjeno.
(2) the regulation would cover international private law (IPL) only; substantive inheritance law would remain unchanged;
3) Združeno kraljestvo in Irska sta uporabili pravico do zavrnitve.
(3) the United Kingdom and Ireland have made use of their right to opt out.
Pravna podlaga predloga uredbe je člen 81 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The legal basis for this proposal for a regulation is Article 81 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Posamezna vprašanja
Specific issues
Kljub temu, da je poročevalec osnovne sklepe predloga podprl, ostajajo v predlogu resni problemi, potrebni so popravki in dodatki.
Despite the fact that the proposal's basic policy line is endorsed, difficult problems remain and corrections and additions need to be made.
Naj omenimo le nekatere.
A number of them will be examined.
Običajno prebivališče je ključni koncept uredbe.
Habitual residence is a key concept in the regulation.
Določitev prebivališča s tem ne bi postala zanesljivejša, zgolj dolgotrajnejša.
It will not be any more reliable as a result, but the process may be more protracted.
Po smrti je treba čim prej določiti pristojno sodišče.
After a death, the competent court should be determined as quickly as possible.
To lahko in mora v konkretnem primeru določiti običajno prebivališče in svojo pristojnost na podlagi skupnih meril, kot je opisano v eni od uvodnih izjav.
Case by case, it will then be able to determine habitual residence and whether it is competent - and indeed must do so - on the basis of general criteria, as set out in a recital.
Poleg treba je treba omeniti, da je le v redkih nacionalnih pravnih ureditvah sprejeta zakonska opredelitev tega pojma, opredeljen ni niti v evropski uredbi o preživninskih obveznostih niti v celi vrsti mednarodnih sporazumov.
It should furthermore be pointed out that very few national legal systems have a statutory definition of the concept, and no definition is provided either in the European regulation concerning law on maintenance or in a whole host of international conventions.
Pravica do izbire prava
Right to choose the law applicable
Pravica do izbire prava, ki se uporablja, je za veliko državljanov in držav novost in hkrati poglavitni del predloga.
The right to choose the law applicable - an innovation for many individuals and states - is a key plank of the proposal.
V zvezi z „favor testamenti” bi bili potrebni različni dodatki in pojasnila.
In the interests of 'favor testamenti', various points should be clarified and added to.
Omejitev materialnega in postopkovnega prava držav članic
Distinction made with Member States' substantive and procedural law
Uredba ureja le mednarodno zasebno pravo držav članic in ne njihovega materialnega dednega prava oziroma drugega materialnega ali postopkovnega prava.
The regulation is intended to cover only the IPL rules of Member States and not their substantive law on succession or other substantive or procedural law.
Vseeno obstajajo manjši vdori in prekrivanja.
However, there is encroachment and overlapping on a minor scale.
Razlog za to so razlike v dednem pravu, materialnem pravu in postopkih dedovanja v različnih državah članicah.
The reason for this is that Member States' law on succession, substantive law and succession proceedings differ.
Materialno in postopkovno pravo držav članic ostaja na predlog poročevalca kar se da nedotaknjeno.
Under the rapporteur's proposal, Member States' substantive and procedural law would remain unaffected as far as possible.
Zaradi tega je poročevalec preventivno pripravil drugi predlog, ki po njegovem mnenju vsebuje minimalne določbe, da ne bi ovirali nacionalnega materialnega in postopkovnega prava.
To be on the safe side, accordingly, the rapporteur has made a second proposal. which, to his mind, contains the minimum which should be laid down so as not to interfere with national substantive and procedural law.
Dedne pogodbe predstavljajo v mednarodnem zasebnem pravu posebno težavo, saj jih nekatere države ne poznajo oziroma celo prepovedujejo.
In IPL, agreements as to succession are a particular problem in that, in some countries, they are unknown or even not allowed.
Jasno bi moralo biti, da uredba ločeno ureja dedno pravo in s tem pravo o nujnih deležih za vse udeležence dedne pogodbe.
It should be clear that the law on succession and hence, for example, on indefeasible interests would be separately determined by the regulation, for each party to an agreement as to succession.
Spremembe bi morale biti tudi v interesu držav članic, ki ne poznajo dednih pogodb.
The changes ought also to be in the interests of Member States in which agreements as to succession are unknown.
Javni red
Public policy