natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil pri izvrševanju proračuna za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice dosežen napredek; vendar močno obžaluje še vedno zelo nizko raven izvrševanja plačil (po podatkih Sodišča 83,3 % v primerjavi z 68 % leta 2003), kar vodi k znatnemu povečanju neporabljenih sredstev (reste à liquider - RAL) s 160 000 000 EUR na 238 000 000 EUR; poziva generalni direktorat za pravosodje, svobodo in varnost, da še izboljša izvrševanje proračuna in zniža RAL;
Welcomes the fact that some progress has been made in the implementation of the budget for an area of freedom, security and justice; deeply deplores, however, the still very low level of implementation of payments (83,8% according to the Court, in comparison to 68% in 2003), which leads to a considerable increase of outstanding commitments (reste à liquider - RAL) from EUR 160 000 000 to 238 000 000; calls on the Directorate-General Justice, Freedom and Security further to improve the implementation of the budget and to reduce RAL;
obžaluje, da je moralo Računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu ponoviti svojo zaskrbljenost glede izvajanja Evropskega sklada za begunce v državah članicah, zlasti glede pomanjkljivosti nadzornih sistemov; poudarja, da morajo države članice vzpostaviti ustrezne nadzorne mehanizme, da bi z deljenim upravljanjem zagotovile ustrezno izvajanje programov nove finančne perspektive; poziva Komisijo, da pravočasno zagotovi ustrezno usposabljanje uradnikov držav članic za nove programe;
Regrets that the Court in its annual report had to repeat its concerns about the implementation of the Refugee Fund by Member States and in particular the weaknesses of control systems; stresses that adequate control mechanisms by the Member States need to be put in place to ensure proper implementation of the programmes within the new financial perspective by shared management; calls on the Commission to provide appropriate training for Member States' officials in time for the new programmes;
obžaluje, da Komisija še vedno ni odobrila finančne uredbe Eurojusta;
Regrets that the financial regulation of Eurojust has still not been approved by the Commission;
zahteva od Komisije, da se v skladu s priporočili Sodišča posvetuje z agencijami ZN o pravici Sodišča do dostopa do projektov, ki jih upravljajo, da se Sodišču omogoči izvajanje potrebnih pregledov na kraju samem;
Requests that the Commission, in line with the Court's recommendation, clarify with the UN agencies the Court's right of access to projects managed by such agencies in order to enable the Court to carry out the necessary on-the-spot checks;
zahteva od Komisije, da pristojni odbor v Parlamentu obvesti o tem, kdaj in kje znatno prispeva k agencijam ZN;
Requests that the Commission inform its competent committee when and why it contributes in a substantial way to UN agencies;
zahteva od Sodišča, da poroča o tem, kako lahko prispevki EU ohranijo prepoznavne lastnosti v družini ZN, ter od Sodišča zahteva, da poroča o prednostih ukrepih financiranja prek ZN, namesto ukrepih Komisije na področju zunanjih odnosov;
Requests that the Court report on how EU contributions can retain their own identity in the UN family and requests that the Court report on the advantages of financing actions through the UN instead of through the Commission's actions in the field of external relations;
izraža zaskrbljenost glede ugotovitev Sodišča o organizacijah za izvajanje projektov;in sicer glede slabosti v njegovem notranjem nadzoru in veliko napak njihovih poslovnih dogodkov; poziva EuropeAid, da nameni posebno pozornost stopnji izvajanja v njegovi celotni oceni tveganja in okrepi revizije izvajalskih organizacij;
Expresses its concerns as regards the Court's observations on the project implementing organisations, namely weaknesses in internal controls and a considerable number of errors in transactions; calls on EuropeAid to pay particular attention to the implementing level in its overall risk assessment and to intensify its audits of implementing organisations;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da se informacije o vseh revizijah, vključno s tistimi, sklenjenimi z delegacijami in izvajalskimi organizacijami, uvedejo v finančni informacijski sistem EuropeAid CRIS, s čimer se povežejo z ustreznimi informacijami o spremljanju projekta ter zagotovi, da so na voljo službam sedežev podjetij; pozdravlja pripravljenost Komisije, da preuči ta predlog, vendar poziva Komisijo, da čim prej začne izvajati to priporočilo Sodišča;
Asks the Commission to ensure that information on all audits, including those contracted by delegations and implementing organisations, is introduced in EuropeAid's CRIS financial information system, thereby linking it to the respective project monitoring information and making it available for the headquarters' services; welcomes the Commission's willingness to examine this proposal but urges however the Commission to implement this recommendation of the Court as soon as possible;
čeprav priznava, da se je EuropeAid odzval na njegovo zahtevo po večji preglednosti in polnipodpori potrebi po boljšem sistemu kontrol, pa obžaluje, da so postali novi postopki veliko bolj zapleteni, okorni, za njihovo izvedbo pa je potrebo veliko preveč časa; poudarja potrebo po dejanski poenostavitvi, pri čemer se ne sme pozabiti na prvotni cilj; zato pozdravlja odločitev, ki jo je sprejel EuropeAid, da od 1. februarja 2006 poenostavi postopek ocenjevanja prejetih predlogov za razbremenitev organizacij-prijaviteljič, ki morajo dostaviti potrebno sspremno dokumentacijo in jamstva o izpolnjevanju pogojev;
Regrets, while recognising that EuropeAid has reacted to its request for greater transparency and fully supporting the need for a better system of checks, the vastly increased complexity of the new procedures, which are cumbersome and take far too long to implement; points out the need for real simplification, while not losing sight of the original objective; welcomes, therefore, the decision by EuropeAid to simplify as from 1 February 2006 the procedure for evaluating proposals submitted to it, in order to reduce the burden on applicant organisations of producing supporting documentation and guarantees of eligibility;
vztraja, da je treba enako poudarjati kakovost programa ter stopnje obveznosti in plačil;
Insists that equal emphasis be placed on both programme quality and commitment and disbursement rates;
poziva Komisijo, da svoj pristojni odbor obvesti o svojih trenutnih dejanskih ukrepih in prihodnjih načrtih za zmanjšanje tveganj, ki nastanejo pri izvajanju in projektih financiranja, predvsem v okolju, nagnjenem k visoki nevarnosti korupcije, s slabimi pregledi in ravnotežji ter strukturami upravljanja; razen tega odobrava mnenje Komisije o tem, ali in do katere stopnje so iz tega izhajajoča tveganja obvladljiva v skladu s pravili Pogodbe;
Invites the Commission to inform its competent committee on its current concrete measures and future plans to reduce the risks of implementing and funding projects in a notably highly corruption-prone environment with feeble checks and balances and governance structures; would also appreciate the Commission's view on whether and to what degree the resulting risks are manageable under the provisions of the Treaty;
ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, da je treba znatne dodatne stroške, ki so nastali z dekoncentracijo, utemeljiti z vidnimi rezultati; pozdravlja oceno Sodišča glede učinkovitosti dekoncentracije v delegacijah, k čemur je Odbor Parlamenta za zunanje zadeve pozval v svojem mnenju o podelitvi razrešnice za leto 2002; vendar upošteva ugotovitev Sodišča, da "določena problematična področja" v postopku načrtovanja "potrebujejo dodatno pozornost";
Reiterates its view that the considerable additional costs entailed by deconcentration need to be justified by tangible results; as such, welcomes the Court's evaluation of how effectively deconcentration has been working in the delegations, as called for by Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs in its opinion on the 2002 discharge; notes, however, the Court's assertion that "some problem areas" in the planning process "need further attention";
priznava težavnost poročanja o rezultatih posameznih donatorjev v okolju več donatorjev; vendar obžaluje namero Komisije, da pri razvojni politiki preide na "pristop, ki temelji na rezultatih", ne da bi določila metodologijo za merjenje specifičnih rezultatov sodelovanja Skupnosti pri ključnih razvojnih ciljih novega tisočletja (RCNT);
Recognises the difficulty of reporting a single donor's results in a multi-donor environment; deplores, however, the Commission's intention to move to a "results-based approach" to development policy without establishing a methodology to measure the specific results of Community cooperation against the key objectives of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs);
soglaša sSodiščem, da obstaja potreba po objektivnih, koristnih in celovitih kazalcih za merjenje rezultata pomoči (Posebno poročilo št. 4/2005, odstavek 63); prepričan je, da bo to doseženo v obdobju 2007-2013;
Agrees with the Court on the need for objective, useful and comprehensive indicators to measure the output of aid (Special Report No 4/2005, paragraph 63); trusts that these will be put in place for the period 2007-2013;
obžaluje, da so celotna sredstva, ki jih je Komisija dodelila za osnovno izobraževanje in osnovno zdravstvo v letu 2004, znašala le 4,98 %, kar je daleč od doseganja cilja 20 %, ki ga je določil Parlament; poziva k pomembnemu dialogu s Komisijo o tem, kako bi lahko izboljšali ta odstotek;
Regrets that the Commission's total reported allocation for basic education and basic health in 2004 was only 4,98%, which was far from meeting the 20% benchmark established by Parliament; calls for a meaningful dialogue with the Commission on how this figure may be improved;
vztraja, da je treba v naslednjem krogu strateških dokumentov države večjo prednost dati glavnim sektorjem RCNT, kakor sta zdravstvo in izobraževanje;
Insists that greater priority be given to the main MDG sectors of health and education in the next round of Country Strategy Papers;
pozdravlja opredelitev sektorske proračunske podpore Odgovor na vprašanje 1,4, vprašalnik Odbora za razvoj.
Welcomes the identification of sector budget support Reply to question 1.4, DEVE questionnaire.
kakor sredstva za povečanje ravni financiranja izobraževanja in zdravstva; meni, da je ta možnost bolj učinkovita kot splošna proračunska podpora, tudi če je povezana z napredkom v tem sektorju;
as a means of increasing the level of financing for education and health; considers this option more effective than general budget support, even when linked to progress in these sectors;
pozitivno ocenjuje prispevek Komisije k Programu javnih izdatkov in finančne odgovornosti (PEFA), ki pomaga zmanjševati tveganja, povezana s proračunsko podporo; vendar upošteva ugotovitev Sodišča, da deljena odgovornost upravljanja javnih financ med Uradom za sodelovanje EuropeAid in Generalnega direktorata za razvoj "deluje samo zaradi obstoječih dobrih osebnih odnosov (Posebno poročilo št. 2/2005, odstavek 65)";
Appreciates the Commission's contribution to the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) programme, which is helping to reduce the inherent risks of budget support; notes, however, the finding of the Court that the shared responsibility for public finance management between the EuropeAid Cooperation Office and the Development Directorate-General "only works because of good interpersonal relations" (Special Report No 2/2005, paragraph 65);
čestita Komisiji, ker je vsako leto od začetka reforme upravljanja zunanje pomoči povečala raven obveznosti in plačil ter reorganizirala urad EuropeAid in s tem zagotovila boljšo podporo "dekoncentriranim" delegacijam; se strinja s pomisleki Komisije Odgovor na vprašanje 5.2, vprašalnik Odbora za razvoj.
Congratulates the Commission on increasing both commitment and payment levels each year since the reform of the management of external assistance and for reorganising EuropeAid to provide better support to deconcentrated delegations; shares the Commission's concern Reply to question 5.2, DEVE questionnaire.
glede pravočasne razpoložljivosti usposobljenega osebja v delegacijah, zlasti za finance, pogodbe in revizijo;
over the timely availability of competent staff in delegations, especially in relation to finance, contracts and audit;
pozdravlja povečanje povprečnega števila osebja, ki upravlja z 10 000 000 EUR, s 4,1 v letu 1999 na 4,8 v letu 2004; obžaluje, da te številke za evropske donatorje ostajajo veliko pod povprečjem in da trenutno padajo;
Welcomes the increase in average staff per EUR 10 000 000 managed from 4.1 in 1999 to 4.8 in 2004; regrets that this figure remains well below the average for European donors and is now falling;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se upravna sposobnost za razvojno politiko v Bolgariji in Romuniji okrepi pred pristopom k EU.
Calls on the Commission to ensure that administrative capacity for development policy in Bulgaria and Romania is strengthened before they accede to the EU;
poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša svoje kazalce stroškov ter pospeši svoje delo pri razvoju kazalcev o hitrosti in kakovosti dobave pomoči, da se omogoči boljša ocena stroškov in ugodnosti postopka prenosa;
Calls on the Commission to improve its cost indicators and speed up its work on the development of indicators on the speed and quality of aid delivery, in order to allow a better assessment of the costs and benefits of the devolution process;
spodbuja Komisijo, da nadalje izboljša kakovost podpore, ki jo zagotovijo sedeži delegacijam;
Encourages the Commission further to improve the quality of support provided by headquarters to the delegations;
spodbuja Komisijo, da si še naprej prizadeva za zagotovitev, da so potrebe kadrovske zasedbe na sedežih in v delegacijah izpolnjene, ter nadaljnjega spodbujanja usposabljanja;
Encourages the Commission to continue its efforts to ensure that staffing needs both at headquarters and in the delegations are met, and to further enhance training;
poziva Komisijo, da si še bolj prizadeva za skrajšanje zamud pri izvajanju projektov zunaj delegacij;
Urges the Commission to increase its efforts to try to reduce delays in project implementation which occur outside the delegations;
pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih je sprejela Komisija za poenostavitev in uskladitev finančnih in pogodbenih postopkov;
Welcomes the steps taken by the Commission to simplify and harmonise financial and contractual procedures;
poudarja, da je treba 24 standardov notranjega nadzora v delegacijah učinkovito uporabiti;
Stresses that the 24 internal control standards in place in the delegations must be applied effectively;
od Sodišča zahteva poročilo o tem, kako se financirajo nevladne organizacije (NVO), ki se ukvarjajo s tem, kaj bi morala biti opredelitev NVO glede na Sodišče, kakšen odstotek sredstev iz NVO financira Skupnost, kateri del prihaja iz zasebnih subjektov, ki niso vezani na nobeno vladno telo, ter prednostih izvajanja projetkov s strani NVO v primerjavi z izvajanjem s strani zasebnih podjetj;
Requests from the Court a report on how non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are financed dealing with the definition of NGO in the Court's view, which percentage of NGOs' resources the Commission finances and which part comes from private entities not attached to any governmental body and the advantages of having projects implemented by NGOs rather than by private undertakings;
nadalje zahteva od Sodišča, da zagotovi ločen pregled pravilnega izvajanja proračunske postavke 19-04 Evropska pobuda za demokracijo in človekove pravice (EIDHR) v celoti, kakor je določil Evropski parlament v letu 1992;
Further requests the Court to provide a separate examination of the proper implementation in its totality of budget line 19-04 European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), as established by Parliament in 1992;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo Sodišča o upravljanju gospodarskega sodelovanja Komisije v Aziji; je seznanjen z ugotovitvijo Sodišča, da je bila osredotočenost na izdatke premajhna in da je projektom na ravni celotne Azije škodoval prezapleteni postopek za vlaganje zahtevkov; pozdravlja izjavo, da so revidirani projekti dosegli precejšnje število upravičencev; odobrava priporočila, naj Komisija zagotovi, da postopki za vlaganje zahtevkov niso po nepotrebnem zapleteni, da delegacije vlagateljem nudijo ustrezno pomoč in da se bolj osredotoča na trajnost projekta;
Welcomes the Court's Special Report on the Commission's management of economic cooperation in Asia; takes note of the Court's finding that there has been a lack of focus in expenditure and, equally, that Asia-wide projects have suffered from an overly complex application procedure; welcomes the statement that the projects audited reached a sizeable number of beneficiaries; endorses the recommendations made that the Commission should ensure that application procedures are not unnecessarily complex, that delegations give adequate assistance to applicants and that there be a greater focus on the sustainability of projects;
poziva Komisijo, da pojasni operativni okvir za pomoč EU za Azijo, s poudarkom na majhnem številu bolje opredeljenih ključnih prednostnih nalog, ki bi pomagale izboljšati učinkovito izvajanje pomoči, ter omogočile bolj ciljno in vplivno usmerjen pristop;
Invites the Commission to clarify the operational framework for EU aid to Asia, focussing on a small number of better defined key priorities which in turn would help to improve effective aid implementation and enable a more result and impact-oriented approach;
poziva Komisijo, da okrepi svoje delo pri razvijanju ustreznih kazalcev za merjenje doseženega napredka ter zagotovi potrebno spremljanje, da se ocenijo doseženi rezultati;
Calls on the Commission to step up its work in developing the appropriate indicators against which to measure progress made and to ensure the necessary monitoring in order to evaluate the results obtained;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija v zdajšnji pregled Finančne uredbe in v Uredbo Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002 z dne 23. decembra 2002 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti, UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str.
Expects the Commission to introduce in the current review of the Financial Regulation and Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
uvedla ustrezno poenostavitev pogodbenih postopkov in postopkov za dodelitev, zlasti v zvezi z majhnimi projekti, da se doseže prilagodljivost pri uporabi pravil skupaj z učinkovitim in dobrim finančnim poslovodenjem;
an adequate simplification of contractual procedures and of procedures for grants, as regards in particular small-scale projects, so that flexibility may be achieved in the application of the rules, along with efficiency and sound financial management;
poziva Komisijo, da ponovno razmisli o zasnovi predpristopnih projektov v smislu boljšega načrtovanja in poenostavljanja ciljev in pogojev; se strinja s Sodiščem, da bi to zmanjšalo tveganje napak pri izvajanju; je prepričan, da bi poenostavljanje zasnove projektov olajšalo ocenjevanje rezultatov;
Invites the Commission to rethink the design of pre-accession projects in terms of better targeting and simplifying objectives and conditions; agrees with the Court that this would reduce the risk of errors in implementation; is convinced that simplifying project design would also facilitate the assessments of results;
je seznanjen z ugotovitvami Sodišča o še vedno pomanjkljivih sposobnostih upravljanja Bolgarije in Romunije, pozdravlja dosežen napredek in odločno poziva bolgarske in romunske oblasti k nadaljnjemu izboljšanju nadzora predpristopne pomoči zato, da bosta bolje pripravljeni za učinkovitejšo uporabo Sstrukturnih skladov; istočasno poziva Komisijo k boljšemu upravljanju in boljši ciljni naravnanosti teh sredstev;
Notes the Court's finding that weaknesses in the management capacity of Bulgaria and Romania remain, welcomes the improvements that have already been made and urges the Bulgarian and Romanian authorities to continue enhancements in the supervision of pre-accession assistance in order to prepare themselves for more efficient use of Structural Funds; at the same time, urges the Commission to improve its management and targeting of those funds;
Vprašanje agencij
Issues concerning the agencies
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Komisija predložila predlog za Medinstitucionalni sporazum o agencijah, kakor je zahteval Parlament v poročilih o razrešnici za agencije za leto 2003; poziva Svet, da čim prej začne pogajanja za sklenitev sporazuma na podlagi osnutka Komisije, ob upoštevanju načel, ki jih je sprejel Parlament v resoluciji z dne 13. januarja 2004 o delovnem okviru za evropske regulativne agencije UL C 92, 16.4.2004, str.
Is pleased to note that the Commission has come forward with a proposal for an Interinstitutional Agreement on the Agencies, as requested by Parliament in its 2003 discharge reports on the agencies; calls on the Council to begin negotiations as soon as possible with a view to concluding an agreement on the basis of the Commission's draft text, taking account of the principles set out by Parliament in its resolution of 13 January 2004 on The Operating Framework for the European Regulatory Agencies OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
ugotavlja, da je bila finančna uredba zasnovana predvsem za Komisijo; se zaveda, da so bile okvirna finančna uredba agencij Uredba Komisije (ES, Euratom) št. 2343/2002 z dne 19. novembra 2002 o okvirni finančni uredbi za organe iz člena 185 Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 o finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 357, 31.12.2002, str.
Notes that the Financial Regulation was designed primarily for the Commission; is aware that the agencies' framework Financial Regulation Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p.
in nadaljnje posamezne finančne uredbe za vsako agencijo UL L 245, 29.9.2003, str.
and the subsequent individual financial regulations for each agency OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p.
zasnovane tako, da so čim bolj v skladu s splošno finančno uredbo; poudarja, da finančna uredba, ki ustreza Komisiji, ni vedno primerna tudi za precej manjše agencije; poziva Komisijo, da pri sedanjem preoblikovanju finančne uredbe zagotovi ustrezno obravnavo potreb agencij;
were all designed to follow as closely as possible the general Financial Regulation; points out that a financial regulation fitting for the Commission might not always suit the much smaller agencies; asks the Commission to ensure that the needs of the agencies are properly addressed in the current reform of the Financial Regulation;
meni, da je nujno izboljšati zanesljivost agencij za učinkovito porabo denarja davkoplačevalcev EU, in zato meni, da bi morale biti agencije odgovorne za svoje odbore Parlamenta;
Finds it necessary to improve the agencies' responsibility for the efficient use of EU taxpayers' money and therefore considers that the agencies have to be accountable to Parliament's respective committees;