natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
bi pozdravil racionalizacijo parlamentarnega postopka, da se v prihodnje zagotovi hitrejšo obravnavo letnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic v Odboru za peticije;
Would welcome a tightening up of internal parliamentary procedures in order to guarantee in future swifter processing of the Ombudsman's annual report by its Committee on Petitions;
poziva institucije Skupnosti in organe, naj pridobijo proračunska sredstva, ki jih potrebujejo, da bi lahko državljanom dali hitre in vsebinske odgovore na vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije;
Calls upon all Community institutions and bodies to be equipped with the necessary budgetary resources in order to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
ponavlja svojo zahtevo iz prejšnjih resolucij, da bi morale vse institucije Skupnosti in organi na podlagi njegove zgoraj navedene resolucije z dne 6. septembra 2001 sprejeti skupen pristop v zvezi z Evropskim kodeksom dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev;
Repeats its call as expressed in previous resolutions for all Community institutions and bodies to adopt a common approach with regard to a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour on the basis of its abovementioned resolution of 6 September 2001;
se v celoti strinja z mnenjem varuha človekovih pravic, da je način odziva uprave na upravičene pritožbe ključno merilo za približevanje institucij in organov Unije državljanom ter da ga je mogoče še znatno izboljšati;
Agrees with the Ombudsman that the manner and method by which an administration responds to legitimate complaints are the yardstick for the degree of proximity to the citizen of the institutions and bodies and that there is still much room for improvement;
pozdravlja nadaljnjo zagotovitev pomoči pritožnikom tudi v primerih, v katerih ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nepravilnosti, pri čemer je bila obenem izrabljena priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti upravnega postopka;
Welcomes the fact that, even in cases where no maladministration could be ascertained, the complainants were provided with assistance and the inquiry was at the same time used as an opportunity to improve the quality of administration;
je zadovoljen z javno podobo varuha človekovih pravic, čigar cilj je, da bi obveščal javnost, in meni, da bi lahko s kakovostnimi informacijami zmanjšali število pritožb, ki niso v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic; obenem poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj pritožbe, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti neposredno posreduje ustreznim nacionalnim ali regionalnim službam,
Declares its satisfaction with the public profile of the Ombudsman, whose aim is to provide the public with information, and considers that information of quality may help to reduce the number of complaints which do not fall within the Ombudsman's terms of reference; at the same time, calls on the Ombudsman to forward immediately those complaints which do not fall within his terms of reference by way of the most appropriate network, from the subsidiarity point of view, at national and local level;
pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi Skupnosti ter potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma kot tudi dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the Community institutions and bodies and endorses him in his role of external control mechanism and, in addition, as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic predložil tri posebna poročila, od katerih je Parlament dva že obravnaval, medtem ko se za preostalo poročilo lahko sedaj začne zaključek sodnega postopka;
Notes that the Ombudsman has submitted three special reports, two of which have already been considered by Parliament, while consideration of the remaining report can now commence on the conclusion of judicial procedures;
meni, da je treba čim prej ustrezno spremeniti status varuha človekovih pravic z dne 9. marca 1994, kar je že zahteval Odbor za peticije v zadnjem poročilu o letnem poročilu varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2004; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je varuh človekovih pravic predsedniku Parlamenta dne 11. julija 2006 predložil obširen predlog v zvezi s tovrstno spremembo;
Is convinced that the necessary adaptation of the Ombudsman's Statute of 9 March 1994, as already called for in its Committee on Petitions" last report on the Ombudsman's annual report for 2004, should be carried out as soon as possible; welcomes the Ombudsman's submission to the President of Parliament of a substantive proposal for such adaptation on 11 July 2006;
ceni dobro sodelovanje z Odborom za peticije Evropskega parlamenta;
Appreciates the Ombudsman's good cooperation with its Committee on Petitions;
vendar poudarja potrebo po jasni opredelitvi in razmejitvi vloge varuha človekovih pravic in vloge svojega Odbora za peticije ter poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj še naprej obravnava le tiste pritožbe državljanov, ki so v njegovi pristojnosti;
Stresses the need, however, for a clear definition and demarcation of the role of the European Ombudsman vis-à-vis the role of its Committee on Petitions and urges the Ombudsman to continue to remain within his terms of reference when seeking to assist citizens;
vendar meni, da bi lahko varuh človekovih pravic in Odbor za peticije, kadar v okviru svojih nalog in pristojnosti preiskujeta vprašanja, ki se prekrivajo – npr. na eni strani način, kako Komisija obravnava kršitve, in na drugi strani kršitve same –, prek tesnega sodelovanja dosegla zelo koristno sinergijo;
Considers, nevertheless, that when the Ombudsman and its Committee on Petitions, acting within their respective mandates and competences, investigate overlapping issues, such as, respectively, the manner in which the Commission has conducted infringement proceedings and the alleged infringement itself, they can achieve useful synergy through close cooperation;
poziva Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, naj izvaja pristojnosti nadzora, ki jih ima po uradni dolžnosti, zato da zagotovi preglednost in pravilni potek vseh postopkov zaposlovanja, ne glede na to, ali ti potekajo prek Evropskega urada za izbor osebja (EPSO) ali neposredno prek evropskega organa, kar vključuje tudi kadrovsko službo samega varuha človekovih pravic;
Calls on the European Ombudsman to exercise ex officio his powers of scrutiny with a view to ensuring transparency and the proper functioning of all recruitment procedures, whether carried out through the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) or directly through a European body, including the Ombudsman's own personnel service;
pozdravlja posebno poročilo glede odprtja sej Sveta za javnost, kadar slednji nastopa v vlogi zakonodajalca, ter poziva Svet, naj upošteva njegovo zgoraj navedeno resolucijo z dne 4. aprila 2006 in v prihodnje pri izvrševanju svoje zakonodajne funkcije vedno zaseda odprtih vrat in dostopno javnosti;
Welcomes the special report on the openness of meetings of the Council when acting in its legislative capacity and calls on the Council to comply with its abovementioned resolution of 4 April 2006 and, in future, for all the meetings in which it acts in its legislative capacity to be open and accessible to the public;
poziva prihodnja predsedstva Sveta, naj v svojih prizadevanjih za večjo preglednost svoje spletne strani ponudijo v vseh uradnih jezikih EU (v skladu s Prilogo I Sklepa Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 15. in 16. junija 2006), da bi čim večjemu številu svojih državljank in državljanov omogočila in olajšala dostop do svojih dejavnosti;
Calls on future Council presidencies, as part of the efforts to boost transparency, to do their best to provide Internet pages in all the official languages of the EU (in accordance with Annex I to the conclusions of the European Council meeting in Brussels on 15-16 June 2006) in order to allow and facilitate access to its activities for as many citizens as possible;
v prizadevanju, da bi Unijo približali državljanom, predlaga, naj bo portal http://europa.eu skupna vstopna stran vseh institucij Skupnosti, da bi državljanke in državljani na podlagi čim jasnejše in preprostejše strukture imeli boljši pregled nad ureditvijo institucij, razdelitvijo pristojnosti in potekom postopkov odločanja znotraj Evropske unije ter da bi se preprečila nepotrebna zmeda zaradi obstoja vzporednih spletnih strani;
Proposes also, as part of the efforts to achieve greater proximity to the citizen, that the entry portal http://europa.eu be established as the uniform entry page for all Community institutions in order to ensure a better overview for citizens of institutional arrangements, allocation of responsibilities and decision-making procedures within the European Union through as clear and simple a structure as possible and to avoid unnecessary confusion from sites existing in parallel;
pozdravlja uvedbo novega notranjega postopka znotraj Komisije, ki je v večini primerov zadolžena za pripravo odgovorov na preiskave varuha človekovih pravic, v zvezi s katerimi se posamezni komisarji povežejo in sodelujejo pri določenem primeru, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ta postopek uporabi tudi pri obravnavi peticij;
Welcomes the introduction of new internal procedures at the Commission as the main body concerned with answering inquiries from the Ombudsman, whereby individual Commissioners assume sponsorship for a specific case, and calls on the Commission to introduce this kind of procedure for the processing of petitions as well;
pozdravlja Evropsko mrežo varuhov človekovih pravic in sodelovanje Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic z varuhi človekovih pravic in podobnimi organi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni v posameznih državah članicah ter spodbuja nadaljnjo krepitev izmenjave najboljših praks;
Welcomes the European Network of Ombudsmen and the collaboration between the European Ombudsman and ombudsmen and similar bodies at national, regional and local levels in the Member States and urges further strengthening of the exchange of best practice;
poziva varuha človekovih pravic, da Odbor za peticije redno obvešča o svojih dejavnostih v državah članicah in o svojih stikih z nacionalnimi varuhi človekovih pravic;
Calls on the Ombudsman to inform its Committee on Petitions at regular intervals about his activities in the Member States and his contacts with the national Ombudsmen;
pozdravlja zlasti posebni pisni postopek, na podlagi katerega nacionalni ali regionalni varuhi človekovih pravic prek Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic prejmejo pisne odgovore na vprašanja o zakonodaji Skupnosti in njeni razlagi, kar je dragocen prispevek k boljšemu prenosu in izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti;
Welcomes, in particular, the special written procedure whereby national or regional ombudsmen receive written answers to queries about Community law and its interpretation via the European Ombudsman as a valuable contribution towards better transposition and application of Community law;
spodbuja Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, naj prireditvam, namenjenim državljankam in državljanom in zato potencialnim pritožnikom, še naprej namenja veliko pozornost, saj sta razdelitev pristojnosti in potek postopkov odločanja na evropski, nacionalni ter regionalni ravni za mnoge državljanke in državljane ter podjetja očitno še vedno nepregledna;
Encourages the European Ombudsman to continue to place great emphasis on events involving citizens and, hence, potential complainants, since clearly the demarcation of responsibilities and decision-making processes between the European, national and regional levels are still too hard to grasp for many citizens and businesses;
pozdravlja vedno večjo udeleženost medijev pri obveščanju o dejavnostih varuha človekovih pravic;
Welcomes the increasing participation of the media in publicising the work of the Ombudsman;
odobri letno poročilo 2005, ki ga je predstavil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in še zlasti ceni podrobno razčlenitev pritožb po sprejetem postopku, vrsti domnevne nepravilnosti, zadevni instituciji itd.;
Approves the annual report for 2005 presented by the European Ombudsman and appreciates, in particular, the detailed breakdown of complaints by procedure adopted, nature of alleged maladministration, institution concerned, etc;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in poročilo Odbora za peticije posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter njihovim varuhom človekovih pravic ali podobnim ustreznim organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of its Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and their ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Beli knjigi o evropski komunikacijski politiki ( 2006/2087(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the White Paper on a European communication policy ( 2006/2087(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Bela knjiga o evropski komunikacijski politiki" ( KOM(2006)0035 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission "White Paper on a European communication policy" ( COM(2006)0035 ),
ob upoštevanju dela II Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Part II of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 195, 211 in 308 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 195, 211 and 308 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 11, 41, 42 in 44 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 11, 41, 42 and 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Akcijski načrt za izboljšanje komuniciranja o Evropi s strani Komisije" ( SEK(2005)0985 ),
having regard to the communication to the Commission entitled "Action Plan to improve communicating Europe by the Commission" ( SEC(2005)0985 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Prispevek Komisije k obdobju razmisleka in za vnaprej: Načrt D za demokracijo, dialog in debato" ( KOM(2005)0494 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission entitled "The Commission's contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate" ( COM(2005)0494 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2002 o sporočilu Komisije o novem okviru za sodelovanje pri dejavnostih politike informiranja in komuniciranja Evropske unije UL C 47 E, 27.2.2003, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2002 on the Commission communication on a new framework for cooperation on activities concerning the information and communication policy of the European Union OJ C 47 E, 27.2.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2003 o strategiji informiranja in komuniciranja za Evropsko unijo UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2003 on an information and communication strategy for the European Union OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. maja 2005 o izvajanju informacijske in komunikacijske strategije Evropske unije UL C 92 E, 20.4.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 12 May 2005 on the implementation of the European Union's information and communication strategy OJ C 92 E, 20.4.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ter mnenj Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0365/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education and the opinions of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0365/2006 ),
ker je komunikacija pomemben sestavni del tako predstavniške kot participativne demokracije,
whereas communication is an important element of both representative and participatory democracy,
ker je zato trdnost demokratičnih elementov EU povezana s komunikacijskimi strukturami na evropski ravni, prek katerih so institucije povezane z državljani,
whereas, for this reason, one of the strengths of the democratic elements of the EU is connected to communication structures at the European level which link the institutions with citizens,
ker morata biti pravica do obveščanja in svoboda izražanja v osrčju demokracije v Evropi ter podlaga političnih sistemov na evropski in nacionalni ravni, kar pomeni, da morajo biti informacije, kolikor je to mogoče, na voljo javnosti,
whereas the right to information and freedom of expression should be at the heart of democracy in Europe and underpin the political systems at European and national levels and thus, insofar as possible, information should be made available to the public,
ker izkušnje z evropskimi volitvami in referendumi kažejo večjo verjetnost, da na njih sodelujejo tisti, ki so seznanjeni z EU vprašanji in jih le-ta zanimajo, kot pa tisti, ki jim informacij primanjkuje,
whereas the experience of European elections and referenda is that those who were aware and interested in EU issues were more likely to participate, whereas those lacking information were less likely to do so,
ker v nasprotju z zelo živahnimi nacionalnimi javnimi prostori trden evropski javni prostor trenutno ne obstaja; ker ti nacionalni javni prostori pa razkrivajo pestrost tako glede obsega razprave o evropskih vprašanjih kot glede vsebine,
whereas there is no consolidated European public sphere at present but very lively national public spheres; whereas those national public spheres reveal deep variations as regards the range and content of the debate on European issues,
ker bi večja vidnost evropskih vprašanj v nacionalnih javnih sferah pomenila pomemben napredek,
whereas it would be an important improvement if in the national public spheres European issues were more prominent,
ker bi bil prvi korak za oblikovanje evropskega javnega prostora preseganje izoliranosti nacionalnih prostorov s pomočjo komuniciranja; ker je to tesno povezano z vseevropskimi ali vsaj nadnacionalnimi medijskimi strukturami,
whereas in order to create a European public sphere, a first step would be to overcome the isolation of national spheres through European communicative action; whereas this is closely related to pan-European or at least transnational media structures,
ker je jasno dokazano, da so državljani premalo seznanjeni z evropskimi vprašanji, kar so pokazale tudi različne ankete evrobarometer,
whereas there is clear evidence of under-information of citizens on European issues, as reflected in the results of various Eurobarometer polls,
opozarjajoč, da so evropske zadeve in dodana vrednost zakonodaje Skupnosti v nacionalnih razpravah redko priznane, saj si nacionalni politiki pogosto pripisujejo zasluge za evropske uspehe, ravno obratno pa zelo radi kritizirajo EU, pogosto zaradi neuspehov v politiki, ki nastane na nacionalni ravni,
whereas European issues and the added value of Community legislation are rarely acknowledged during national debates, with national politicians often taking credit for European success stories while, conversely, being quick to criticise the EU, often for failures in policy that arise at national level,
ker je Evropski svet v Bruslju 16. in 17. junija 2006 vprašanje institucionalne reforme ponovno uvrstil na dnevni red,
whereas the Brussels European Council of 16 and 17 June 2006 put the issue of institutional reform back on the agenda,
ker je namen "obdobja za razmislek", da postane Unija bolj demokratična in učinkovitejša ter da se ponovno poveže s svojimi državljani,
whereas the aim of a 'period of reflection' is to make the Union more democratic and effective and to 'reconnect' it with its citizens,
pozdravlja predstavitev Bele knjige in se strinja z namenom Komisije, da komunikacijsko politiko preoblikuje v samostojno politiko z lastno vsebino;
Welcomes the presentation of the White Paper and endorses the Commission's intentions to make communication policy a policy in its own right;
se mu zdi potrebno izboljšati komunikacijo med EU in njenimi državljani, zato podpira prizadevanja, da se spremeni način komuniciranja z državljani; poudarja, da boljša komunikacije ne more nadomestiti pomanjkljive politike, vendar lahko pripomore k boljšemu razumevanju izvajanja politike;
Sees the need to improve communication between the EU and its citizens; therefore supports the attempt to overhaul the way communication with citizens is organised; stresses that better communication cannot compensate for inadequate policies but can improve the understanding of the policies conducted;
je zadovoljen, ker se Komisija zaveda, da mora biti vsakršna komunikacije odvisna od vsebine in mora biti "dvosmerni" proces, katerega del je tudi poslušanje državljanov, vendar obžaluje, da se ta na začetku bele knjige izražena načela ne nadgradijo z ničemer otipljivim; zato poziva Komisijo, naj natančno opredeli, kako namerava upoštevati glas državljanov in v ta namen predlaga vključitev morebitnih pobud drugih institucij kot je "Agora", organ za posvetovanje s predstavniki civilne družbe, ki ga namerava ustanoviti Parlament;
Welcomes the Commission's recognition of the fact that communication can never be divorced from what is being communicated and that it should be a two-way process that involves listening to citizens, but regrets that these principles, asserted at the beginning of the White Paper, do not find any practical expression; calls on the Commission, therefore, to specify how it intends to take into account citizens' views and suggests, to this end, that possible initiatives launched by other institutions, such as 'Agora', a body that Parliament has decided to set up for the purpose of consultation with civil society representatives, are incorporated;
poziva Komisijo, naj podpre oblikovanje evropskega javnega prostora, zlasti prek nacionalnih, lokalnih in regionalnih medijev, ne da bi pri tem pozabila na pomembno vlogo kakovostnih nacionalnih in regionalnih časopisov ter televizijskih poročil, ki v zadostni meri pokrivajo evropskih zadev; v zvezi s tem poziva države članice, naj ustrezno spodbujajo nacionalne javne avdiovizualne programe k obveščanju državljanov o politiki, ki se izvaja na evropski ravni;
Urges the Commission to support the creation of a European public sphere, primarily structured through national, local and regional media, though without losing sight of the important role played by quality national and regional newspapers and television news in dedicating sufficient coverage to European affairs; and to that end, calls on the Member States to encourage the national public audiovisual channels adequately to inform the citizens about the policies conducted at European level;
ocenjuje, da cilj evropske komunikacijske politike ne bi smelo biti izoblikovanje komunikacijskega prostora, ki tekmuje z nacionalnimi javnimi prostori, ampak več vzporednic med razpravami na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU;
Notes that the aim of a European communication policy should not be the creation of a communication sphere that competes with the national public spheres, but rather a close alignment of national debates with the debates at EU level;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri oblikovanju komunikacijske politike preuči konkretne predloge, podane v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 12. maja 2005;
Urges the Commission to take into consideration the concrete proposals set out in its above-mentioned resolution of 12 May 2005 when designing a communication policy;
podpira zamisel o vzpostavitvi dvosmerne komunikacije med EU in njenimi državljani, s pomočjo katere bo pripravljena in sposobna bolj natančno prisluhniti mnenju državljanov o Evropi; vendar opozarja, da se ne zdi smiselno, da bi državljani postali gonilna sila participacije in dialoga, saj niso oni tisti, ki bi morali iskati informacije, ampak bi morale informacije poiskati njih;
Supports the idea of setting up a two-way communication between the EU and its citizens, which is able and willing to listen more closely to what citizens wish to say about Europe; points out, however, that the idea of citizens becoming drivers of participation and dialogue does not seem reasonable, since it is not citizens who should seek out information, but rather information that should seek out the citizens;