natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali pritožbe
when the person was served with the decision, how he or she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or an appeal and
v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
in a language which he or she understood
o pravici do
, about the right to a retrial
pritožbe ali
or an appeal
kjer bi imela pravico sodelovati in kjer bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe
in which he or she would have the right to participate, at which the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed,
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Priloga – polje d – točka 2.3.2
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Annex – box d – point 2.3.2
? 2.3.2 osebi ni bila vročena odločba
? 2.3.2 the person was not served with the decision
, izdana v nenavzočnosti,
rendered in absentia,
? 2.3.2 osebi odločba ni bila vročena in
? 2.3.2. the person was not served with the decision and
– ko bo osebi vročena odločba,
– when served with the decision
izdana v nenavzočnosti,
rendered in absentia
in pravici do navzočnosti na tem sojenju
and to be present at that trial
– ko bo osebi vročena odločba, bo izrecno obveščena
– when served with the decision, the person will be expressly informed,
v jeziku, ki ga razume,
in a language which he or she understands,
ali do pritožbe, kjer ima pravico sodelovati in kjer se bo lahko vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bo lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe
or an appeal, in which he or she will have the right to participate, which will allow the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be (re)examined and which may lead to the original decision being quashed
– po tem, ko je bila osebi vročena odločba,
– after being served with the decision
bo imela oseba na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje.
, the person will have … days to request a retrial.
– po tem, ko je bila osebi vročena odločba, bo imela oseba na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje
– after being served with the decision, the person will have ... days to request a retrial
ali pritožbo
or an appeal
Če ste obkljukali okence 2.3.2, prosimo potrdite:
If you ticked box 2.3.2, please confirm
? ali je zadevna oseba, ko je bila v državi izvršitve obveščena o vsebini evropskega naloga za prijetje in predajo, pred predajo zahteva kopijo sodbe in ji bo kopija ali izvleček sodbe prek izvršilnega sodnega organa posredovana v jeziku, ki ga razume, v ... dneh po tem, ko to zahteva.
? that if the person concerned, when being informed in the executing State about the content of the European arrest warrant, requests a copy of the judgment before being surrendered, he or she will be provided with a copy of the judgment or with an extract from the judgment in a language which he or she understands ... days after the request is made via the executing judicial authority.
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 1 – točka e
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 1 – point e
"Odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti" pomeni odločbo, kot je opredeljena v točki (a), če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča v sodnem postopku, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba.";
"(e) 'Decision rendered in absentia' shall mean a decision as defined in (a) when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision.";
Člen 3 – točka 2 – podtočka b
Article 3 – point 2 - subpoint b
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i – uvodni del
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i - introductory part
nenavzočnosti v
in absentia
skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je:
, unless the certificate states that the person:
razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je
, unless the certificate states that the person
bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države izdajateljice
, in accordance with the national law of the issuing State
(i) pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
in due time, and in a language which he or she understood
prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice
informed in accordance with the national law of the issuing State through a competent representative and in due time, of
obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju
the scheduled date and place of
obravnave, ki se je zaključila z odločbo, izdano v nenavzočnosti
the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia
kako drugače dejansko uradno
by other means actually received official information about
sojenja na način, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial,
o dejstvu
about the fact that such a
, da se lahko
decision may be handed down
takšna sodba izreče v primeru
in case the person
ne udeleži sojenja
not appear
obveščena, da se lahko
decision may be handed down
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i – podtočka i a (novo)
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – subpoint i a (new)
(ia) po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju; ali
(ia) after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial; or
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i – podtočka i i
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – subpoint ii
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i – podtočka (iii)
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i – subpoint iii
o pravici do ponovnega sojenja
, about the right to a retrial
ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja
– did not request a retrial
10 dni in najdlje 15 dni.
shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Člen 7 – odstavek 2 – točka i a (novo)
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point i a (new)
(ia) v skladu s potrdilom iz člena 4 oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da se je oseba, potem ko je bila izrecno obveščena o sodnem postopku in možnosti, da osebno sodeluje na sojenju, izrecno odpovedala pravici do ustne obravnave in izrecno navedla, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
(ia) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the person did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, having been expressly informed about the proceedings and the possibility of participating in person in the trial, expressly waived the right to an oral hearing and expressly indicated that he or she did not contest the case.
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – uvodni del in podtočki 1 in 2 3.
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - introductory part and subpoints 1 and 2 3.
oseba navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo
person appeared in person at the trial which led to the decision
Ne, ni bila.
No, it was not
Da, bila je.
Yes, it was.
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – podtočka 2.1
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - subpoint 2.1
osebno povabljena ali prek pristojnega zastopnika pravočasno in
through a competent representative and
, ki se je
in due time,
odločba izreče
rendered in absentia
2.1 je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice
2.1 the person was
, pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
and in a language which he or she understood, about
o načrtovanem datumu in kraju
the scheduled date and place of the
sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno
was personally
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – podtočka 2.1 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - subpoint 2.1 a (new)
2.1a je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
2.1a. after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – podtočka 2.2
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - subpoint 2.2
2.2 je oseba pred ali po
2.2 the person, before or after being
Opišite, kdaj in kako je
Describe when and how the person expressly stated that he or she
je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja
when the person was served with the decision, how he or she was informed of his/her right to a retrial or to an appeal and
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – podtočka 2.3
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - subpoint 2.3
v nenavzočnosti, dne …..
rendered in absentia
(dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
on … (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial in the issuing State under the following conditions:
? 2.3 je bila
? 2.3 the person was
vročena odločba, izdana
served with the decision
po sojenju, na katerem ni bila navzoča,
following a trial at which he or she did not appear in person
in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja
on … (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial
ali pritožbe
or to an appeal
v državi izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
in the issuing State under the following conditions:
da je prisotna na tem sojenju
and to be present at that trial
ali do pritožbe
or to an appeal
Okvirni sklep 2005/214/PNZ Priloga – polje h – točka 3 – podtočka 2.3 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA Annex – box h – point 3 - subpoint 2.3 a (new)
2.3a se je oseba po tem, ko je bila izrecno obveščena o sodnem postopku in možnosti, da osebno sodeluje na sojenju, izrecno odpovedala pravici do ustne obravnave in izrecno navedla, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
2.3a the person, having been expressly informed of the proceedings and the possibility of participating in person in the trial, expressly waived the right to an oral hearing and expressly indicated that he or she did not contest the case.
Opišite, kdaj in kako se je oseba odpovedala pravici do ustne obravnave in navedla, da ne izpodbija odločbe.
Describe when and how the person waived the right to an oral hearing and indicated that he or she did not contest the case:
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Člen 2 – točka i
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Article 2 – point i
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – točka e – uvodni del
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – introductory part
razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je
, unless the certificate states that the person,
bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države izdajateljice
in accordance with the national law of the issuing State
da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial,
, da se lahko odredba o zaplembi izreče v primeru, če se
confiscation order may be handed down
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Člen 8 – odstavek 2 – točka e – podtočka i a (novo)
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point e – subpoint i a (new)
(ia) je po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
(ia) after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
kjer bi imela pravico sodelovati in kjer bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe
in which he or she would have the right to participate, at which the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed
oseba izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odredbe o zaplembi,
not contest the confiscation order;
10 dni in najdlje 15dni.
shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days.
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Priloga – polje j – uvodni del in točki 1 in 2 (j)
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Annex – box j – introductory part and points 1 and 2 (j)
oseba navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi
person appeared in person at the trial which led to the confiscation order
Če ste na to vprašanje odgovorili z "ne", prosimo navedite, ali:
If you answered "no" to this question, please indicate if:
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Priloga – polje j – točka 2 – podtočka 2.1
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Annex – box j – point 2 - subpoint 2.1
, ki se je
which led to the
zaključilo z odredbo o zaplembi
confiscation order, in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that the person concerned was aware of the scheduled date and place of the trial
sicer tako, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno
was personally
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Priloga – polje j – točka 2 – podtočka 2.1 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Annex – box j – point 2 -subpoint 2.1 a (new)
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Priloga – polje j – točka 2 – podtočka 2.2
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Annex – box j – point 2 - subpoint 2.2
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija
, expressly stated that he or she does not contest
odločbe, izdane v nenavzočnosti
the decision rendered in absentia
2.2 je oseba po
2.2 the person, after being
obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja ali do pritožbe, kjer bi imela pravico sodelovati in kjer bi se vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe, izrecno
confiscation order and being expressly informed, in a language which he or she understood, about the right to a retrial or to an appeal, in which he or she would have the right to participate, at which the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, would be (re)examined and which could lead to the original decision being quashed
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija
not contest the
odločbe, izdane v nenavzočnosti
decision rendered in absentia
je bila osebi odredba o zaplembi vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja
when the person was served with the confiscation order, how he or she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or to an appeal and
kako je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija
not contest the
Okvirni sklep 2006/783/PNZ Priloga – polje j – točka 2 – podtočka 2.3
Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA Annex – box j – point 2 - subpoint 2.3
odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti,
decision rendered in absentia
dne ….. (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja v državi članici izdajateljici pod naslednjimi pogoji:
on … (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial in the issuing State under the following conditions:
odredba o zaplembi
confiscation order
dne ….. (dan/mesec/leto) in je bila upravičena do ponovnega sojenja
on … (day/month/year) and was entitled to a retrial
v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
, in a language which he or she understood
je imela po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje
right, the person had … days to request a retrial and he or she did not request it during
– je imela
- after being informed of
po tem, ko je bila obveščena o tej pravici, na voljo … dni, da zahteva ponovno sojenje
right, the person had ... days to request a retrial
ali vloži pritožbo, česar
or an appeal
v tem času ni
and he or she did not request it during
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Člen 1 – točka (e)
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Article 1 – point e
"Odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti" pomeni odločbo, kot je opredeljena v točki (a), če oseba ni bila osebno navzoča v sodnem postopku, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba.";
"Decision rendered in absentia" shall mean a decision as defined in (a) when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision."
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka f
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f
(f) če je bila odločba
(f) according to the certificate provided for in Article 4, the decision was rendered
nenavzočnosti v
(f) according to the certificate provided for in Article
na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča,
following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka (f) – podtočka (i a) (novo)
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Article 9 − paragraph 1 – point f – subpoint i a (new)
(ia) je po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
(ia) after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial , had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Člen 9 – odstavek 1 – točka f – podtočka ii
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f – subpoint ii
10 dni in najdlje 15 dni.
shall be a minimum of 10 days and a maximum of 15 days.
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – uvodni del in podtočki a in b 1.
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Annex – box k – point 1 - introductory part and subpoints a and b 1.
je bila oseba osebno povabljena ali
in accordance with the national law of the issuing
o dejstvu
about the fact
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – podtočka b.1 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Annex – box k – point 1 - subpoint b.1 a (new)
? b.1a je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
? b.1a after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
ko ji je bila osebno vročena odločba in je bila
served with the decision
izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe
, expressly stated that he or she
Opišite, kdaj in kako je
not contest the decision.
je bila osebi odločba vročena, na kakšen način je bila obveščena o svoji pravici do ponovnega sojenja
when the person was served with the decision, how he or she was informed about his/her right to a retrial or to an appeal and
kako je izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe:
not contest the decision:
Okvirni sklep 2008/.../PNZ Priloga – polje k – točka 1 – podtočka b.3
Framework Decision 2008/.../JHA Annex – box k – point 1 - subpoint b.3
? b.3 je bila
? b.3 the person was
po sojenju, na katerem ni bila navzoča,
following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person
ponovnega sojenja ni zahtevala
- after being informed of
ali vloži pritožbo,
and he or she did not
v tem času
request during
(1) v členu [9(1)] se točka [h] nadomesti z naslednjim:
"1) in Article [9(1)], point [h] shall be replaced by the following:
(h) če je bila odločba v skladu s potrdilom iz člena [6] izdana po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, razen če je v potrdilu navedeno, da je bila oseba v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice:
(h) according to the certificate provided for in Article [6], the decision was rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, unless the certificate states that the person, in accordance with the national law of the issuing State:
(i) pravočasno in v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
(i) in due time, and in a language which he or she understood,
- neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja, in sicer tako, da je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
- either was directly summoned in person or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial,
- osebno obveščena, da se odločba lahko izreče tudi, če se ne udeleži sojenja;
- was personally informed that a decision may be handed down if he or she did not appear at the trial;