natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(f) v dokaz dejanske in odločne podpore andskem procesu regionalne integracije je treba iz smernic izvzeti vsakršno izrecno ali posredno postavljanje pogojev, ki podpis prihodnjega sporazuma EU-AS pogojuje s predhodnim zaključkom kroga pogajanj STO, ne da bi s tem kdaj kasneje v smernice onemogočila vključitev rezultatov delovnega programa iz Dohe, ki so skladni s prvim ciljem pridruževanja EU-AS,
(f) as a demonstration of tangible, decisive support for the Andean regional integration process, in particular, there should be no subordinating conditions of any kind, whether explicit or tacit, making the conclusion of the future EU-ANC Agreement subject to the prior completion of the WTO round negotiations, without prejudice to the Agreement’s including, in due time, those results of the Doha working programme which are compatible with the final goal of the EU-ANC Association;
(h) poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament podrobno obvešča, zaupno, če je potrebno, o svojih priporočilih glede pogajalskega mandata;
(h) the Commission should provide Parliament with exhaustive information, on a confidential basis if necessary, as to its recommendations concerning the negotiating mandate;
naroči predsedniku, naj priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji, kot tudi vladam držav članic Evropske unije.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission, and to the governments of the Member States of the European Union.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0381/2006
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0316/2006
ki ga vlaga Enrique Barón Crespo
by Enrique Barón Crespo
v imenu Odbora za mednarodno trgovino
on behalf of the Committee on International Trade
o navedbi države izvora na nekaterih izdelkih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav ("označba izvora")
on indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries (‘origin marking’)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o navedbi države izvora na nekaterih izdelkih, uvoženih iz tretjih držav ("označba izvora")
European Parliament resolution on indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries (‘origin marking’)
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 980/2005 z dne 27. junija 2005 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov, UL L 169, 30.6.2005, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 980/2005 of 27 June 2005 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences, OJ L 169, 30.6.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/29/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. maja 2005 o nepoštenih poslovnih praksah podjetij v razmerju do potrošnikov na notranjem trgu UL L 149, 11.6.2005, str.
having regard to Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market, OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju člena IX in člena XXIV:5 Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT 1994),
having regard to Article IX and Article XXIV:5 of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT 1994),
ob upoštevanju sporazumov med Evropsko skupnostjo in Bolgarijo, Romunijo, Turčijo ter pogodbenicami Evropskega gospodarskega prostora,
having regard to agreements between the European Community and Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey and the Contracting Parties of the European Economic Area,
ob upoštevanju Poročila Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. oktobra 2005 o obetih za trgovinske odnose med EU in Kitajsko Zapisnik s tem datumom P6_TA(2005)0381 . ,
having regard to the European Parliament report of 13 October 2005 on ‘Prospects for trade relations between the EU and China’, Minutes of that date P6_TA(2005)0381 .
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 z dne 12. oktobra 1992 o carinskem zakoniku skupnosti UL L 155, 29.5.1998, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Custom Code OJ L 155, 29.5.1998, p.
60. in Uredbe Komisije (EGS) št. 2454/93 z dne 2. julija 1993, ki med drugim določa sistem Evropske skupnosti o nepreferencialnih pravilih o poreklu blaga UL L 253, 11.10.1993, str.
60. and to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 setting up, inter alia, the European Community’s non-preferential rules of origin system, OJ L 253, 11.10.1993, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 918/83 z dne 28. marca 1983 o sistemu oprostitev carin v Skupnosti UL L 105, 23.4.1983, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty, OJ L 105 , 23.4.1983, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o prihodnosti tekstilnega in oblačilnega sektorja v razširjeni EU (KOM(2003)649),
having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘The future of the textiles and clothing sector in the enlarged EU’ (COM(2003) 649),
ker Evropska unija trenutno nima usklajenih določb oziroma skupnih praks v zvezi z označbo izvora v EU z izjemo nekaterih posebnih primerov v kmetijskem sektorju; ker razlike med veljavnimi uredbami v državah članicah in odsotnost jasnih predpisov Skupnosti na tem področju povzročata razdrobljen pravni okvir.
whereas, at present, the European Union does not have harmonised provisions or uniform practices on origin marking in the EU, except for some specific cases in the agricultural sector; whereas disparities between regulations in force in the Member States and the absence of clear Community rules in this area result in a fragmentary legal framework,
ker izidi posvetovanj Evropske komisije s splošnimi interesnimi skupinami (industrija, uvozniki, združenja potrošnikov, sindikati) o možnem oblikovanju uredbe EU o označevanju izvora kažejo, da evropski potrošniki pripisujejo v splošnem velik pomen označevanju izvora v zvezi s seznanjanjem z varnostjo, družbenimi in okoljskimi zadevami,
whereas the results of the European Commission’s general stakeholder consultation (industry, importers, consumers associations, trade unions) on the possible development of an EU regulation on origin marking indicate that European consumers’ perception of the relevance of origin marking for their information in relation to safety, social and environmental concerns is generally high,
ker niso dovoljeni nacionalni ukrepi, ki bi predpisovali obvezno označbo izvora blaga, ki je uvoženo iz drugih držav članic (kot ukrepi z ustreznim učinkom, ki niso v skladu s členom 28 Pogodbe ES in jih ni mogoče utemeljiti z varstvom potrošnikov) kot posledica sodbe Evropskega sodišča (primer 207/83), medtem ko za obvezno označbo izvora blaga, uvoženega iz tretjih držav, takih omejitev ni,
whereas national measures imposing compulsory origin marking on goods imported from other Member States are prohibited (as measures having equivalent effect, inconsistent with Article 28 of the EC Treaty and incapable of justification on consumer protection grounds) as a result of a ruling by the European Court of Justice (Case 207/83), while there is no such limitation on compulsory origin marking on goods imported from third countries,
ker si je EU v lizbonski agendi zastavila za cilj okrepiti evropsko gospodarstvo, med drugim tudi s povečanjem konkurenčnosti evropske industrije v svetovnem gospodarstvu; ker so nekatere kategorije izdelkov široke porabe morda konkurenčne zato, ker jih to, da so izdelani v EU, povezuje s slovesom kakovosti in visokih proizvodnih standardov,
whereas, in the Lisbon Agenda, the EU set itself the objective of strengthening the European economy by, inter alia, improving the competitiveness of the European industry in the world economy; whereas, for certain categories of consumer goods, competitiveness may lie in the fact that their production in the EU is associated with a reputation for quality and high production standards,
ker bi sistem navedbe države izvora omogočil evropskim potrošnikom, da bi bili v celoti seznanjeni z državo izvora izdelka, ki ga kupujejo; ker bi potrošniki tako lahko istovetili te izdelke z družbenimi, okoljskimi in varnostnimi standardi, ki se običajno povezujejo s to državo,
whereas an origin-marking scheme would allow European consumers to be fully aware of the country of origin of the products they purchase; whereas consumers would thus be able to identify these products with the social, environmental and safety standards generally associated with that country,
ker je predlog, ki uvaja sistem obvezne navedbe države izvora v EU, skrčen na omejeno število uvoženih izdelkov, kot so tekstil, nakit, oblačila, obuvala, usnje, svetila in svetlobna oprema, steklena posoda in torbice, pri katerih zahteva po oznaki "izdelano v" potrošnikom omogoča ključne in dragocene informacije pri dokončni izbiri,
whereas the proposal introducing a mandatory country of origin marking system in the EU is restricted to a limited number of imported products such as textiles, jewellery, apparel, footwear, leather, lamps and light fittings, glassware and handbags, for which the ‘made in’ requirement provides an essential and valuable item of information for consumers’ final choice,
ker so številni veliki trgovinski partnerji EU, na primer ZDA, Kitajska, Japonska in Kanada, uvedli predpise o obvezni navedbi države izvora; ker se morajo torej izvozniki v EU uskladiti s temi zahtevami in navajati izvor svojih izdelkov, če jih nameravajo izvoziti na te trge,
whereas a number of the EU’s major trading partners, such as the United States, China, Japan and Canada, have enacted mandatory origin-marking requirements; whereas EU exporters are therefore asked to comply with these requirements and have to mark the origin of their products if they intend to export to these markets,
ker je predlagana uredba ključna za zagotavljanje, da se s temi trgovinskimi partnerji vzpostavijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji; ker so izdelki iz EU trenutno v neenakopravnem položaju v primerjavi z izdelki, ki vstopajo v EU in niso podvrženi podobnim obveznostim o navedbi izvora,
whereas the proposed regulation is crucial to ensuring that a level playing field is restored with such trading partners; whereas products originating in the EU are currently in a position of disadvantage compared to those entering the EU which are not subject to comparable marking obligations,
ker bi večja ozaveščenost potrošnikov, zaradi katere so evropski izdelki bolj privlačni, lahko spodbudila domače in tuje vlagatelje v EU; ker bi bilo to koristno zlasti za mala in srednje velika podjetja ter sektorje, izpostavljene svetovni konkurenci, ki morajo postati konkurenčnejši, da bi se lažje spopadli s spremenjenimi razmerami na trgu,
whereas an increased awareness of consumers, resulting in greater attractiveness for European products, could act as an incentive for domestic and foreign investors in the EU; whereas this would be of particular benefit to SMEs and sectors exposed to global competition which need to enhance their competitiveness in order better to face changed market conditions,
ker bi zahteva za označbo "izdelano v", čeprav ne bi bila odločilna, prispevala k zmanjšanju ponarejanja in nelojalne konkurence; ker bi bila uspešnost Uredbe (ES) št. 1382/2003 ("proti ponarejanju") učinkovito okrepljena z obvezno navedbo države izvora uvoženih izdelkov,
whereas, albeit not decisive, the ‘made in’ requirement would contribute to reducing counterfeiting and unfair competition; whereas the effectiveness of Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003 (‘anti-counterfeiting’) would be effectively enhanced by the mandatory origin marking of imported products,
pozdravlja predlog Uredbe Sveta (dok.
Welcomes the proposal for a Council Regulation (Doc.
2005/0254 (ACC)), ki uvaja obvezno navedbo države izvora za nekatere izdelke, uvožene iz tretjih držav v Evropsko unijo ("označba izvora");
2005/0254 (ACC)) introducing compulsory indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries into the European Union (‘origin marking’);
obžaluje dejstvo, da Komisija sploh ni poslala predlagane uredbe Parlamentu v vednost, čeprav se Komisija in Svet dobro zavedata, kako pomembna je označba izvora za Parlament; razume, da ta predlog temelji na členu 133 Pogodbe in kot tak po zakonu ne zahteva obveznega posvetovanja s Parlamentom; vendar pa vztraja, da bi bilo treba Evropskemu parlamentu vedno dati možnost, da pravočasno pove svoje mnenje o vseh pomembnih pobudah drugih institucij Skupnosti;
Deplores the fact that, despite the Commission and the Council being fully aware of the importance that Parliament attaches to origin marking, the Commission did not even send the proposed regulation to Parliament for information; understands that this proposal is based on Article 133 of the Treaty and, as such, does not legally require consultation of Parliament; insists, however, that the European Parliament should always be given the opportunity to express its views on any relevant initiative undertaken by other Community institutions in a timely manner;
opozarja, da se je Komisija zavezala, da zagotovi sodelovanje Parlamenta v skladu z Medinstitucionalnim okvirnim sporazumom z dne 26. maja 2005 na način, da se lahko v največji možni meri upošteva mnenje Parlamenta;
Recalls the Commission’s obligation to ensure the involvement of Parliament, in accordance with the Interinstitutional Framework Agreement of 26 May 2005, in such a way as to take Parliament’s views into account as far as possible;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da nemudoma obvestita Parlament o izidih morebitnih nadaljnjih presoj vplivov in pravnih analiz, opravljenih zlasti zaradi domnevnih neskladnosti predlagane uredbe z obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti in pravili STO;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to inform Parliament without delay of the results of any further impact assessment and legal analysis carried out, in particular with respect to the alleged inconsistencies of the proposed regulation with existing Community legislation and WTO rules;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj posebej poudarita spodbujanje dobrega mnenja o evropski industriji v Skupnosti in izven nje, ohranjanje njene identitete in posebnosti ter zagotavljanje, da vsesplošnega dobrega slovesa industrije Skupnosti ne omadežuje nenatančna in zavajajoča označba izvora;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to place special emphasis on promoting the image of the European industry inside and outside the Community, safeguarding its identity and specificity, and ensuring that the overall good reputation of the Community industry is not tarnished by inaccurate or misleading indications of origin;
poudarja, da načela liberalizacije trgovine lahko pridobijo podporo javnosti samo, če se uporabljajo pregledno in dosledno v skladu z načelom pravne države tako v Evropski skupnosti kot zunaj nje;
Stresses that trade liberalisation principles can gain more public support only if they are applied transparently and consistently, in compliance with the principle of the rule of law, both within and outside the European Community;
poziva Komisijo Svet, naj sprejmeta vse potrebne ukrepe, da se zagotovijo enaki konkurenčni pogoji s trgovinskimi partnerji, ki izvajajo zahtevo po označbi izvora;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to take all necessary steps to ensure a level playing field with trading partners that have implemented origin-marking requirements;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj uvedeta ustrezen carinski nadzor in mehanizme uveljavljanja;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to set up proper customs surveillance and enforcement mechanisms;
poziva države članice, naj ohranijo dosleden pristop Skupnosti do tega vprašanja, kar bi omogočilo evropskim potrošnikom, da dobijo obsežnejše in natančnejše informacije, poleg tega pa bi z majhnimi dodatnimi stroški za uvoznike ali brez njih pomagalo spodbujati podobo in privlačnost izdelkov evropske industrije z visoko dodano vrednostjo;
Urges Member States to maintain a consistent Community approach to this issue, which would enable European consumers to receive more comprehensive and accurate information and in addition would promote the image and attractiveness of high-value European industrial products with little or no added cost to importers;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj skupaj z državami članicami odločno posreduje za zaščito legitimnih pravic in pričakovanj potrošnikov, kadarkoli naleti na dokaze o varljivem ravnanju in/ali uporabi goljufivih ali zavajajočih navedb izvora s strani tujih proizvajalcev in uvoznikov;
Encourages the Commission to intervene strongly, together with the Member States, to defend consumers’ legitimate rights and expectations whenever there is evidence of deceptive behaviour and/or use of fraudulent or misleading origin markings by foreign producers and importers;
pozdravlja izključitev blaga, ki izvira iz Bolgarije, Romunije, Turčije in pogodbenic Evropskega gospodarskega prostora, če izključitev teh držav ne povzroči izogibanja pravilom o označbi izvora;
Welcomes the exclusion of goods originating in Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey and the Contracting Parties of the European Economic Area from the scope of the proposed regulation, provided that the exclusion of these countries does not result in any circumvention of the origin-marking rules;
o vsebini sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za preprečevanje terorizma in čezmejnega kriminala, vključno z organiziranim, ter boj proti njima
on the content of the Agreement with the United States of America on the use of Passenger Name Records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime
Predlog priporočila Svetu o vsebini sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za preprečevanje terorizma in čezmejnega kriminala, vključno z organiziranim, ter boj proti njima
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the content of the Agreement with the United States of America on the use of Passenger Name Records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime
upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in 318/04,
having regard to the Court of Justice's judgment of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and 318/04,
ker je Sodišče razveljavilo (sodba z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in 318/04) sklep 2004/496/ES, ki pooblašča predsednika Sveta za podpis sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o evidencah imen letalskih potnikov, in odločbo o ustreznosti, ki jo je sprejela Komisija 14. maja 2004 in obravnava enako zadevo,
whereas the Court of Justice annulled (judgment of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and 318/04) Decision 2004/496/EC authorising the President of the Council to sign the Agreement with the United States of America on PNR and the Adequacy Decision adopted by the Commission on 14 May 2004 dealing with the same subject,
ker se Sodišče ni odzvalo na zaskrbljenost Parlamenta o pravni strukturi sporazuma in njegovi neskladnosti z načelom varstva podatkov iz člena 7 evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah,
whereas the Court of Justice did not respond to Parliament's concerns about the legal structure of the agreement and on its lack of compliance with the data protection principles of Article 7 of the ECHR,
se je od 1. oktobra 2006 treba izogniti pravni pomanjkljivosti na evropski ravni glede prenosa podatkov o potnikih, pravice in svoboščine potnikov pa je treba zaradi enostranskih zahtev, ki jih je posredovala administracija ZDA, varovati še bolj kot doslej;
a legal lacuna at European level should be avoided from 1 October 2006 for the transfer of passenger data. and the rights and freedoms of passengers should be protected even more than at present in the face of the unilateral 'undertakings' submitted by the US administration;
EU nujno rabi jasen pravni okvir, da bo lahko okvirni sklep o varovanju podatkov sprejet čim prej;
the EU urgently needs a clear legal framework, with the result that the Draft Data Protection Framework Decision should be adopted as a matter of urgency;
morajo načela EU o varovanju podatkov navdihniti vse nove sporazume na tem področju;
EU principles on data protection should inspire any new agreements in this domain;
se je treba z oblikovanjem doslednega medstebrskega okvira za varovanje podatkov v Uniji z uporabo premostitvene klavzule v skladu s členom 42 PEU izogibati umetni delitvi stebrov, da se zagotovi, da bo nov sporazum sklenjen v sodelovanju z EP in pod sodnim nadzorom Sodišča;
the artificial division between the pillars should be avoided through the creation of a consistent cross-pillar data protection framework in the Union by activating the passerelle clause under Article 42 TEU, so as to ensure that the new Agreement will be concluded in association with the EP and subject to the judicial supervision of the Court of Justice;
ker bo zaradi koledarskih omejitev nujno:
whereas, owing to calendar constraints, it will be necessary:
če je potrebno, razviti bolj usklajen srednje- in dolgoročni pristop k izmenjavi podatkov o potnikih na ravni ICAO, da bi zagotovilo tako varnost v letalskem prometu kot tudi spoštovanje človekovih pravic na svetovni ravni;
to develop, if necessary, for the medium to long term a more coherent approach at ICAO level towards the exchange of passenger data in order to ensure both air traffic security and respect of human rights at global level.
ki ga vlaga Willy Meyer Pleite
by Willy MEYER PLEITE
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o pogajalskih smernicah za sklenitev pridružitvenega sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Srednjo Ameriko
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the guidelines for the negotiation of an Association Agreement between the European Union and Central America
ob upoštevanju odstavka 31 dunajske deklaracije, ki navaja sklep o začetku pogajanj o pridružitvenem sporazumu in vzpostavitvi območja proste trgovine, ki sta ga Evropska unija in Srednja Amerika sprejeli na 4. vrhu EU-LAK,
having regard to paragraph 31 of the Vienna Declaration, which contains the decision taken by the European Union and Central America at the Fourth EU-LAC Summit to open negotiations on an Association Agreement, including the establishment of a free-trade area,
ob upoštevanju naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union.
ob upoštevanju člena 114(1) svojega poslovnika v zvezi s členom 83 tega dokumenta,
having regard to Rule 114(1), in conjunction with Rule 85, of its Rules of Procedure,
ker morajo biti spoštovanje demokracije, pravne države in neovirano uveljavljanje človekovih pravic za vse, vključno s pravicami in temeljnimi svoboščinami avtohtonih ljudstev, ter zaščita zagovornikov človekovih pravic in odprava nekaznovanosti osnovni pogoji za razvoj partnerstva, kot je bilo sklenjeno na Dunaju,
whereas the establishment of democracy and constitutional government, the full enjoyment of human rights by all individuals (including the rights and the fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples), the protection of those who uphold human rights and the elimination of impunity must constitute basic conditions for the development of the Association between the parties, as was decided in Vienna;