natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ponavlja, da je v številnih državah po svetu še vedno običajna prepoved, zaplemba in uničevanje krajev, na katerih poteka čaščenje, ter verskih publikacij, pa tudi prepoved izobraževanja duhovnikov; poziva institucije EU, naj v svojih stikih z zadevnimi vladami nasprotujejo takim kršitvam in naj spodbujajo države, v katerih se zakoni o bogokletstvu izkoriščajo za preganjanje članov verskih manjšin, da take določbe spremenijo ali odpravijo;
Recalls that in a number of countries in the world, prohibition, confiscation and destruction of both places of worship and religious publications, and prohibition of the training of clergy, are still common practice; urges the EU institutions, in their contacts with the relevant governments, to counter such violations and to encourage those countries where blasphemy laws are used for the purpose of persecuting members of religious minorities to amend or abolish such provisions;
poudarja, da je za EU svoboda vesti temeljna vrednota, ki vključuje pravico do verovanja ali neverovanja ter pravico do prakticiranja vere po lastni izbiri;
Stresses that for the EU freedom of conscience is a fundamental value, incorporating the freedom to believe or not to believe and the freedom to practice the religion of one's choice;
je zaskrbljen, ker se svoboda izražanja napada v različnih novih oblikah, zlasti z uporabo sodobnih tehnologij, kot je internet; ponovno opozarja, da pravica do svobode izražanja vključuje pravico iskati, prejemati in posredovati informacije in zamisli prek vseh medijev;
Is concerned that freedom of expression has come under attack in various new forms, especially using modern technologies such as the internet; reiterates that freedom of expression includes the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any medium;
priznava, da nove tehnologije zagotavljajo možnosti, kot jih še ni bilo, za sodelovanje v javnem življenju, izražanje mnenj, pridobivanje dostopa do informacij o človekovih pravicah in obveščanje ostale javnosti o kršitvah človekovih pravic; je zaskrbljen, ker države uporabljajo vedno bolj izpopolnjene tehnike za cenzuriranje informacij in spremljanje dejavnosti na internetu, na primer tehnologije z dvojno rabo, ter da je v več državah prišlo do nadlegovanja, pregona in celo pripora ter zapora oseb, ki uporabljajo internet za uveljavljanje pravice do svobode mnenja in govora;
Recognises that new technologies provide unprecedented opportunities to participate in public life, express opinions, gain access to information about human rights and make violations of human rights known to the rest of the world; is concerned that states are using increasingly sophisticated techniques, such as dual-use technologies, to censor information and monitor activities on the internet, and that harassment, persecution and even detention and imprisonment of people using the internet to exercise the right to freedom of opinion and expression have occurred in a number of countries;
spodbuja visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, naj prevzame vodilno vlogo pri sprejemanju stališča in razvoju konkretne politike, da bo EU ukrepala kot svetovni dejavnik na področju svobode na internetu, ki bo zajemala tako načine za obravnavo groženj za človekove pravice zaradi uporabe novih tehnologij kot krepitev priložnosti za varstvo človekovih pravic in podpora slednjih;
Encourages the HR/VP to take the lead in adopting a position and developing concrete policies for the EU to act as a global player when it comes to internet freedom by covering not only ways of addressing threats to human rights through the use of new technologies, but also using them as a means of enhancing opportunities to protect and support human rights;
poziva države, ki omejujejo dostop do interneta, naj odpravijo omejitve glede prostega pretoka informacij; ugotavlja, da v skladu z organizacijo „Novinarji brez meja“ „seznam sovražnikov interneta“ vključuje naslednje države, ki izvajajo obsežno internetno cenzuro: Belorusija, Kitajska, Kuba, Egipt, Iran, Mjanmar/Burma, Severna Koreja, Savdska Arabija, Sirija, Tunizija, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan in Vietnam;
Urges countries that limit access to the internet to lift restrictions on the free flow of information; notes that according to ‘Reporters without Borders’ the ‘internet enemy list’ includes the following states which engage in pervasive internet censorship: Belarus, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iran, Myanmar/Burma, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi seznam posameznikov, odgovornih za resno kršitev človekovih pravic v Iranu, kot so mučenje, cenzura, posilstva in izvensodne usmrtitve, zlasti po volitvah leta 2009, ter naj razmisli o uvedbi kazni v obliki zamrznitve premoženja in prepovedi potovanja proti zadevnim posameznikom;
Urges the Commission to draw up a list of individuals responsible for severe human rights violations, such as torture, censorship, rape and extra-judicial executions, in Iran, particularly after the 2009 elections, and to consider imposing sanctions on them in the form of asset freezes and travel bans;
podpira pravico do izražanja in miroljubnega združevanja v Rusiji, kakor jo uradno, ne pa tudi v praksi zagotavlja člen 31 ruske ustave; izraža solidarnost z organizatorji in sodelujočimi v Strategiji-31, vrsti civilnih protestov v podporo tej pravici, ki so se začeli 31. julija 2009 in se odvijajo na Triumfalnem trgu v Moskvi 31. vsakega meseca z 31 dnevi; obžaluje, da so oblasti 31. oktobra 2010 zavrnile dovoljenje za vse proteste Strategija-31 razen zadnjega z utemeljitvijo, da je bil ob istem času na Triumfalnem trgu načrtovan potek drugih dejavnosti; je resno zaskrbljen, ker je ruska policija 31. decembra 2009 med ducati drugih miroljubnih protestnikov pridržala predsednico Skupine Moskva-Helsinki, Ljudmilo Aleksejevo, ki ji je Parlament podelil nagrado Saharov le nekaj tednov pred tem; podpira poziv ruskega komisarja za človekove pravice Vladimirja Lukina za začetek preiskave grobih policijskih ukrepov v povezavi s protesti 31. maja;
Supports the right of expression and peaceful assembly in Russia as formally, but not actually, guaranteed by Article 31 of the Russian Constitution; expresses solidarity with the organisers and participants of Strategy-31, the series of civic protests in support of this right which started on 31 July 2009 and take place on Triumfalnaya Square in Moscow on the 31st of every month with 31 days; regrets that, except for the very last one, on 31 October 2010, all Strategy-31 demonstrations have been refused permission by the authorities on the grounds that other activities had been scheduled to take place in Triumfalnaya Square at the same time; is deeply concerned that on 31 December 2009, among dozens of other peaceful protesters, Russian police detained the Chairperson of the Moscow Helsinki Group, Lyudmila Alexeyeva, who had been awarded Parliament's Sakharov Prize only a few weeks before her detention; supports the call of the Human Rights Commissioner of Russia Vladimir Lukin to launch an investigation into the harsh police action in connection with the 31 May protests;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkanja svobode izražanja v Venezueli in na Kubi, nadzora nad mediji, omejene in nadzorovane uporabe interneta ter poskusov za zadušitev nestrinjanja;
Is deeply concerned at the lack of freedom of expression in Venezuela and Cuba, the grip on news media, the restricted and controlled internet use and the attempts to stifle dissent;
obsoja terorizem v vseh njegovih oblikah; opozarja, da je terorizem po vsem svetu povzročil na tisoče smrtnih žrtev med nedolžnim civilnim prebivalstvom in uničil življenje številnih družin; zavzema stališče, da je v primeru terorističnih napadov nujno govoriti zlasti in predvsem o pravicah žrtev in ne storilcev; poudarja potrebo, da se zagotovi, da bodo teroristi privedeni pred sodišče;
Condemns terrorism in all its forms; recalls that terrorism worldwide has resulted in thousands of deaths of innocent civilians and has shattered the lives of many families; takes the view that in the case of terrorist attacks it is imperative to talk first and foremost about the rights of the victims and not the perpetrators; stresses the need to make sure that terrorists are brought to justice;
ugotavlja, da so posledica boja proti terorizmu kršitve temeljnih človekovih pravic v številnih državah po svetu, v obliki uporabe nesorazmernih nadzornih ukrepov, nezakonitega pridržanja in uporabe mučenja kot sredstva za pridobivanje informacij od domnevnih teroristov; izraža skrb, da nekatere države izrabljajo boj proti terorizmu kot krinko za zadušitev etničnih manjšin in lokalnih zagovornikov človekovih pravic in poziva, da se boj proti terorizmu ne sme uporabljati kot argument za omejevanje ali prepoved zakonitega in legitimnega delovanja zagovornikov človekovih pravic; obsoja te kršitve človekovih pravic in poudarja stališče EU, da mora boj proti terorizmu potekati ob spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in pravne države; je prepričan, da v boju proti terorizmu državljanske svoboščine ne bi smele biti okrnjene;
Notes that measures to fight terrorism have resulted in violations of basic human rights in a number of countries around the world, in the form of the application of disproportionate surveillance measures, illegal detentions and the use of torture as a means of extracting information from suspected terrorists; expresses concern that certain countries are using the fight against terrorism as a cloak to crack down on ethnic minorities and local human rights defenders, and urges that the fight against terrorism not be used as an argument to restrict or ban the lawful and legitimate action of human rights defenders; condemns these violations of human rights, underlines the EU's position that the fight against terrorism must be conducted with full respect for fundamental rights and the rule of law and is convinced that civil liberties should not be compromised in the fight against terrorism;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj uporabita priložnost, ki jo nudijo dvostranski politični dialogi in dialogi na področju človekovih pravic z državami, ki niso članice EU, da ponovno opozorita, da je treba v boju proti terorizmu spoštovati človekove pravice in da protiteroristična politika v nobenem primeru ne sme postati sredstvo, ki se lahko uporablja proti zagovornikom človekovih pravic ali političnim nasprotnikom; zlasti poziva visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, naj javno obsodi kršitve človekovih pravic v protiterorističnih politikah in operacijah;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to use the opportunity of bilateral political and human rights dialogues with non-EU countries to recall that human rights have to be respected when combating terrorism, and that under no circumstance must counter-terrorism policy be instrumentalised and used against human rights defenders or political opponents; calls in particular on the HR/VP to publicly denounce human rights violations in counter-terrorism policies and operations;
opozarja na odločitev predsednika ZDA Baracka Obame januarja 2009, da bo zaprl taborišče Guantanamo; izraža obžalovanje, da te odločitve še ni bilo mogoče v celoti izvesti; opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 13. junija 2006 o položaju zapornikov v Guantanamu, ki vztraja, da se z vsakim zapornikom ravna v skladu z mednarodnim humanitarnim pravom in se mu, če je obtožen, nemudoma zagotovi pravično in javno zaslišanje; opozarja na Skupno izjavo EU-ZDA z dne 15. junija 2009 o zaprtju zapora v zalivu Guantanamo in prihodnjem sodelovanju v boju proti terorizmu, ki pozdravlja odločnost ZDA, da zapre tajne zapore; poziva vlado ZDA, da izpolni svoje zaveze; poziva države članice EU, naj se dogovorijo o usklajenem načrtu ukrepov za pomoč ZDA pri zapiranju zapora v zalivu Guantanamo, tako da nekdanjim zapornikom, ki niso obtoženi zločinov in jih ni mogoče vrniti v domovino ali ponovno naseliti v ZDA, dodelijo status begunca; pozdravlja konstruktivno sodelovanje več držav članic EU pri njihovih prizadevanjih za pomoč pri sprejemu nekaterih bivših zapornikov iz Guantanama in pri iskanju nastanitve za nekatere osebe, ki so bile spoznane za nedolžne in bodo izpuščene iz zapora; kljub temu ugotavlja, da so doslej le naslednje države članice EU – Nemčija, Irska, Slovaška, Danska, Združeno kraljestvo, Španija, Portugalska, Belgija, Francija, Madžarska in Italija privolile, da bodo sprejele zapornike; je zaskrbljen, ker ZDA zadržujejo zapornike brez sojenja, na primer v vojaškem letalskem oporišču Bagram v Afganistanu;
Recalls the decision of US President Barack Obama to close the Guantanamo Bay detention camp in January 2009; expresses its regret that this decision has not yet been able to be fully implemented; recalls its resolution of 13 June 2006 on the situation of prisoners at Guantanamo, which insists that every prisoner be treated in accordance with international humanitarian law and, if charged, tried without delay in a fair and public hearing; recalls the EU-US Joint Statement of 15 June 2009 on the Closure of the Guantanamo Bay Detention Facility and Future Counter-Terrorism Cooperation, which welcomed the determination of the US to eliminate secret detention facilities; asks the US Government to live up fully to its commitments; calls on the EU Member States to agree on a coordinated action plan to assist the USA in closing Guantanamo's detention facilities, by granting refugee status to former detainees who are not charged with crimes and cannot be repatriated or resettled in the USA; welcomes the constructive engagement of a number of EU Member States in their efforts to assist with reception of certain former Guantanamo detainees and with finding accommodation for some of the people cleared for release from the detention camp; ; notes however that to date only the following EU Member States – Germany, Ireland, Slovakia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, Belgium, France, Hungary and Italy – have agreed to take detainees; is concerned about the ongoing detention without trial of detainees by the US, for example at the Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan
je seznanjen s sklicem prvega vrhunskega srečanja o Romih dne 16. septembra 2008 pod francoskim predsedstvom in drugega takega srečanja pod španskim predsedstvom dne 9. in 10. aprila 2010; zelo zaskrbljeno opazuje prisilni izgon romskih skupnosti v Evropi in naraščanje ksenofobije ter sovražnega govora v zvezi z manjšinskimi in potujočimi skupnostmi; ponavlja poziv Evropskega parlamenta, da morajo države članice v celoti izpolnjevati svoje obveznosti na podlagi prava EU, in če države članice teh obveznosti ne izpolnjujejo, poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj formalno in odločno ukrepa in sproži postopke v primeru kršitev;
Notes the convening under the French Presidency on 16 September 2008 of the inaugural Roma Summit, and the second such Summit held under the Spanish Presidency on 9-10 April 2010; notes with gravest concern the forced expulsions of Roma communities in Europe and the rise in xenophobic and hate language in relation to minority and migrant communities; reiterates the call of the European Parliament for Member States to honour to the full their obligations under EU law; and where Member States do not comply, calls on the European Commission to act formally and forcefully on infringement proceedings;
ugotavlja, da po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe postopek soodločanja velja za direktive in druge oblike zakonodaje o boju proti terorizmu in organiziranem kriminalu, medtem ko bo moral Parlament dati soglasje k mednarodnim sporazumom v zvezi s to temo; ugotavlja, da bodo te spremembe zagotovile Parlamentu dodaten vpliv na ustrezno ravnovesje med varnostjo in človekovimi pravicami; se zavezuje, da bo ravnal v skladu s svojimi novimi posebnimi pravicami in dosledno pozival k spoštovanju in spodbujanju človekovih pravic, državljanskih in političnih svoboščin ter demokracije v vseh odnosih EU z državami, ki niso članice EU in regionalnimi organizacijami;
Notes that following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty the codecision procedure applies to directives and other forms of legislation on the fight against terrorism and organised crime, whereas international agreements related to this subject will have to be assented to by Parliament; notes that these changes will give Parliament additional leverage on the right balance between security and human rights; undertakes, therefore, to act in line with its new prerogatives by consistently calling for respect for, and promotion of, human rights, civil and political liberties and democracy in all the EU's relations with non-EU countries and regional organisations;
ponavlja, da je vsaka država članica dolžna zaščititi potencialne žrtve, ki jih je mogoče določiti in katerim preti realna in neposredna grožnja terorističnega napada, ter dodaja, da morajo vse države članice sprejeti vse razumne ukrepe, da vzpostavijo postopke za preprečevanje teroristične dejavnosti in zmanjšanje stranskih posledic protiterorističnih dejavnosti;
Reiterates that each Member State has a positive obligation to protect identifiable potential victims who are at real and immediate risk of terrorist acts, and adds that all Member States must take all reasonable measures to put in place procedures to prevent terrorist activity and to minimise the collateral impact of counter-terrorism activities;
opozarja na okvirni sklep Sveta EU iz marca 2001 o žrtvah terorizma: nujna pomoč, neprekinjena pomoč, preiskava in pregon, učinkovit dostop do prava in pravice, sodno varstvo, odškodnine, varstvo zasebnega in družinskega življenja žrtev, varstvo dostojanstva in varnosti žrtev, obveščanje za žrtve ter posebno usposabljanje za odgovorne za pomoč žrtvam;
Recalls the EU Council Framework Decision of March 2001 on victims of terrorism: emergency assistance, continuing assistance, investigation and prosecution, effective access to the law and justice, administration of justice, compensation, protection of the private and family life of victims, protection of the dignity and security of victims, information for victims and specific training for those responsible for assisting victims;
Dialog o človekovih pravicah in posvetovanje z državami, ki niso članice EU
Human rights dialogues and consultations with non-EU countries
izraža razočaranje glede pomanjkanja napredka pri nekaterih dialogih in posvetovanjih o človekovih pravicah; ugotavlja, da se vključevanje civilne družbe v te dialoge in posvetovanja ne zagotavlja sistematično in da zanj včasih veljajo omejitve, ki jih nalagajo strani zunaj EU; izraža zaskrbljenost, da tudi v primeru, ko se zadeve načnejo, vlade ne izpolnjujejo svoje obveznosti poročanja EU o posameznih in strukturnih vprašanjih, ki se odpirajo v okviru dialoga;
Expresses its disappointment at the lack of progress achieved by a number of human rights dialogues and consultations; notes the fact that the involvement of civil society in these dialogues and consultations is not systematically guaranteed and is sometimes subject to constraints imposed by the non-EU parties; is concerned that even when cases are raised, governments are not fulfilling their commitment to report back to the EU on the individual and structural issues raised within the framework of the dialogue;
poziva k resničnemu sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta pri sprotnem ocenjevanju dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah; zahteva popoln dostop do sklepnih dokumentov in drugih ustreznih virov; pričakuje, kot rezultat ocenjevanj, razvoj jasnih kazalnikov za merjenje učinka dialogov in izrecno opredeljenih predlogov, za vsako državo posebej, za izboljšanje teh rezultatov in preprečevanje ponovnih neuspehov pri posvetovanjih EU o človekovih pravicah;
Calls for real participation by the EP in the on-going evaluations of the human rights dialogues and consultations; asks for full access to the outcome documents and to other relevant sources; expects, as a result of the evaluations, the development of clear indicators to measure the impact of the dialogues and explicitly defined suggestions, based on a country-by-country approach, as to how to improve these outcomes and avoid any repeated failures of EU human rights consultations;
poziva Evropske institucije, naj zagotovijo preglednost in doslednost med cilji, vrednotami in ravnanji na tem področju;
Calls on the European institutions to ensure transparency and coherence between themselves in terms of objectives, values and attitudes in this field;
poudarja, da je treba sklepe dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah vključiti v vrhovna srečanja EU z njenimi partnericami;
Points out the need to feed the conclusions of the human rights dialogues and consultations into EU summits with its partners;
meni, da je treba na splošno dialoge in posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah načrtovati in voditi pregledno, cilje, ki se določijo pred dialogi, pa po njih oceniti; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj pritisneta na oblasti držav zunaj EU, da obsežno in na visoki ravni vključijo ministre v dialoge in posvetovanja;
Takes the view that, in general, human rights dialogues and consultations must be planned and conducted transparently, and that objectives set in advance of the dialogue must be evaluated immediately afterwards; calls on the Council and the Commission to press the non-EU countries‘ authorities for high, broad ministerial involvement in the dialogues and consultations;
poziva države pristopnice EU, naj izboljšajo varstvo človekovih pravic na svojih ozemljih, da se približajo ravni, ki jo zagotavljata Listina EU o temeljnih pravicah ter Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin;
Calls on the EU accession countries to improve the level of human rights protection in their territories in the light of that provided for under the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj bosta pri svojih posvetovanjih o človekovih pravicah in dialogih z državami, ki niso članice EU, zelo pozorna na položaj narodnostnih in verskih manjšin ter na pogoste kršitve njihovih pravic;
Calls on the Commission and the Council in their human rights consultations and dialogues with non EU-countries to pay close attention to the situation of ethnic and religious minorities and the frequent violations of their rights;
pozdravlja tesnejše usklajevanje in sodelovanje med ZDA in Evropsko unijo na področju človekovih pravic;
Welcomes closer coordination and cooperation between the United States and the European Union on human rights;
poziva k tesnemu usklajevanju med državami članicami EU, Evropsko komisijo in Agencijo EU za temeljne pravice pred vsakim dialogom o človekovih pravicah med EU in državami, ki niso članice EU; poudarja, da mora biti EU sposobna obravnavati kršitve človekovih pravic na ozemlju Unije, če naj bi v svetovnem okviru slovela kot braniteljica človekovih pravic;
Calls for strong coordination between EU Member States, the European Commission and the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights of every EU human rights dialogue with non-EU countries; points out the need for the EU to be able to tackle human rights violations inside the Union itself if it is to be viewed as a beacon of human rights on the world stage;
pozdravlja prvi dialog o človekovih pravicah med EU in Belorusijo, ki je potekal junija 2009, obenem pa obžaluje, da položaj človekovih pravic v tej državi ostaja slab, z nenehnim omejevanjem svobode združevanja, zbiranja in izražanja ter zatiranjem zagovornikov človekovih pravic in novinarjev;
Welcomes the first EU-Belarus human rights dialogue, which took place in June 2009, while regretting that the human rights situation in that country remains dire, with continuing restrictions on freedom of associations, assembly and expression, and repression of human rights defenders and journalists;