natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Árpád Duka‑Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam in Vytautas Landsbergis v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Árpád Duka‑Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam and Vytautas Landsbergis, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Jan Marinus Wiersma in Hannes Swoboda v imenu skupine PSE
– Jan Marinus Wiersma and Hannes Swoboda, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs in Henrik Lax v imenu skupine ALDE
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs and Henrik Lax, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Adam Jerzy Bielan, Inese Vaidere, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis in Guntars Krasts v imenu skupine UEN
– Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Adam Jerzy Bielan, Inese Vaidere, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis and Guntars Krasts, on behalf of the UEN Group
o razmerah v Južni Osetiji
on the situation in South Ossetia
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Gruziji in zlasti tiste z dne 14. oktobra 2004,
having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia, in particular that of 14 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. januarja 2006 o evropski sosedski politiki,
having regard to its resolution of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy,
ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu o politiki EU do južnega Kavkaza z dne 26. februarja 2004 in svojega poročila o odnosih med EU in Rusijo maja 2005,
having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 26 February 2004 on EU policy towards the South Caucasus and to its report of May 2005 on EU-Russia relations,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Gruzijo na drugi, ki je začel veljati leta 1999,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, which entered into force in 1999,
ob upoštevanju sklepov zasedanja Sveta za splošne zadeve in zunanje odnose s 16. in 17. oktobra 2006,
having regard to the conclusions of the General Affairs and External Relations Council meeting of 16-17 October 2006,
ob upoštevanju člena 103(4) poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker se razmere v Južni Osetiji v zadnjih mesecih slabšajo in prihaja do incidentov, streljanj in vsakodnevnih spopadov med gruzijskimi in osetskimi silami ter policijo, kar povzroča žrtve in poškodbe,
whereas the situation in South Ossetia is deteriorating, with incidents, shootouts and clashes between Georgian and Ossetian forces and police units in recent months causing deaths and injuries,
ker gruzijska vlada in parlamenta zavračata sedanji pogajalski proces, sestavo mirovnih sil in mehanizme mirovnih operacij iz sporazuma o prekinitvi ognja z leta 1992,
whereas the Government and Parliament of Georgia have questioned the existing format of the negotiating process, the composition of the peacekeeping forces and the mechanisms of the peacekeeping operations stemming from the ceasefire agreement of 1992,
ker sta obe strani predstavili dva ločena mirovna načrta z veliko skupnimi točkami, ki bi lahko bile oziroma bi morale biti podlaga za uspešna pogajanja, ker se je komisija za skupen nadzor nedavno izkazala za neučinkovito,
whereas the two sides have put forward two separate peace plans which contain many common elements that could and should be used as a basis for fruitful negotiations; whereas the Joint Control Commission (JCC) has lately proved incapable of producing significant results,
ker Ruska federacija z izdajanjem potnih listov prebivalcem Južne Osetije in Abhazije otežuje mirno reševanje spora na spornih območjih Gruzije,
whereas the Russian Federation, by issuing passports to the residents of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, is complicating the process of peaceful conflict resolution in the conflict zones in Georgia,
ob upoštevanju odločitve voditeljev Južne Osetije, da se za 12. november 2006 vzporedno s predsedniškimi volitvami razpiše tudi referendum o samoodločbi,
having regard to the decision by the South Ossetian leadership to hold a referendum on self‑determination together with the presidential election on 12 November 2006,
ker je Gruzija začela poglobljen dialog z Natom o polnopravnem članstvu v tej organizaciji,
whereas Georgia has moved to the stage of ‘intensified dialogue’ with NATO with a view to becoming a full member of that organisation,
je močno zaskrbljen zaradi diplomatskih težav Gruzije in Rusije, do katerih je prišlo, ker je gruzijska protiobveščevalna služba zaradi domnevnega vohunjenja nedavno priprla štiri častnike ruske vojaške obveščevalne službe GRU in ker je Moskva po tem dogodku ruskega veleposlanika pozvala k posvetu,
deeply worried at the diplomatic crisis between Georgia and Russia following the recent arrests of four officers from Russia’s military intelligence service (GRU) by the Georgian counterintelligence services on allegations of espionage and the subsequent recall of the Russian ambassador to Moscow for consultations,
ker so ruske oblasti 2. oktobra ustavile vse cestne, zračne in morske povezave z Gruzijo, med drugim tudi poštno povezavo, čeprav je Gruzija štiri oficirje izročila Organizaciji za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi in so zdaj že v Rusiji,
whereas on 2 October 2006 the Russian authorities interrupted all land, air and sea links with Georgia, including mail communications, although the four officers had been released to the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and are now back in Russia,
ker so ruske oblasti proti Gruzijcem, ki živijo v Rusiji, zaradi njihove narodnosti izvedle številne hude diskriminacijske ukrepe, med drugim tudi izgon 700 Gruzijcev iz Moskve v Tbilisi ter domnevno nadlegovanje gruzijskih vernikov, poslovnežev in šolarjev z izgovorom, da gre za obračun z organiziranim kriminalom in nezakonitimi priseljenci,
whereas a number of seriously discriminatory measures have been taken by the Russian authorities against Georgians living in Russia on the grounds of their ethnicity, including the deportation of nearly 700 Georgians from Moscow to Tbilisi and the alleged harassment of Georgian worshippers, businessmen and schoolchildren under the pretext of a clampdown on organised crime and illegal immigrants,
ker je Ruska federacija v začetku leta 2006 prepovedala uvoz kmetijskih proizvodov (vina, sadja in zelenjave) iz Moldavije in Gruzije, kar zelo škoduje gospodarskemu razvoju obeh držav,
whereas in early 2006 the Russian Federation imposed a ban on the import of agricultural products (wine, fruit and vegetables) from Moldova and Georgia, which is considerably harming the economic development of both countries,
ker enostranskih gibanj za neodvisnost v Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji ne podpira nobena mednarodna organizacija in ker pod okriljem Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi in Združenih narodov še naprej potekajo prizadevanja za obnovo suverenosti in ozemeljske celovitosti Gruzije,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia,
ker mora Evropska unija v sodelovanju z Organizacijo za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter z drugimi akterji povečati svojo trenutno pomoč pri reševanju sporov v Gruziji in regiji južnega Kavkaza,
whereas the EU must increase its support for the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflicts in Georgia and the South Caucasus region, in cooperation with the OSCE and other actors,
ponovno poziva k mirnemu reševanju spora in se zavezuje, da bo podpiral mirovni proces, ter poziva vse strani, naj ravnajo odgovorno in se vzdržijo enostranskih korakov ter provokativnih in agresivnih izjav, ki lahko prispevajo k zaostrovanju položaja in se razvijejo v nasilje;
Reiterates its call for a peaceful resolution of the conflict and its commitment to support the peace process, and calls on all parties to act responsibly by refraining from unilateral steps and inflammatory and aggressive statements which serve to exacerbate the situation and may degenerate into violence;
ponovno potrjuje svojo podporo suverenosti in ozemeljski celovitosti Gruzije ter poziva ruske oblasti, naj v celoti upoštevajo suverenost te države v okviru njenih mednarodno priznanih meja;
Reaffirms its full support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia and calls on the Russian authorities to fully respect the sovereignty of that country within its internationally recognised borders;
močno obsoja poskus gruzijskih regij Abhazije in Južne Osetije, da enostransko dosežeta samostojnost;
Strongly condemns the attempts by movements in the Georgian regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia to establish independence unilaterally;
poziva vlado Ruske federacije, naj odreče svojo podporo vsakemu tovrstnemu gibanju in v celoti podpre večstranska prizadevanja za iskanje rešitve sporov v svoji soseščini;
Calls on the Government of the Russian Federation to withhold support from all of these movements and to give its fullest support to the multilateral efforts to find a solution to the conflicts in its neighbourhood;
obsoja dejstvo, da je Južna Osetija za 12. november 2006 razpisala referendum o neodvisnosti, in opozarja vse strani, da podoben referendum o neodvisnosti iz leta 1992 ni bil mednarodno priznan;
Condemns the fact that South Ossetia will hold a referendum on independence on 12 November 2006, and reminds the parties that a similar referendum on independence in 1992 was not internationally recognised;
ugotavlja, da je treba zaustavljeni mirovni proces ponovno sprožiti, in poziva k okrepljenemu in usklajenemu prizadevanju Evropske unije in Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi, da bi obe strani nadaljevale pogajanja na osnovi napredka, doseženega v začetnih stopnjah obeh mirovnih načrtov;
Notes that the stagnated peace process needs to be relaunched, and calls for an enhanced and combined effort by the European Union and the OSCE to bring the parties back to the negotiating table, based on the progress made in the initial stages of the two peace plans;
v zvezi s tem poziva obe strani, naj podpišeta skupni dokument o neuporabi sile in varnostnih zagotovilih ter začneta konstruktivna pogajanja in se tako premakneta z mrtve točke; obžaluje, da zasedanje komisije za skupni nadzor 12. in 13. oktobra 2006 v Vladikavkazu ni prineslo rezultatov;
Calls, in that connection, on both parties to sign the joint document on refraining from the use of force and on security guarantees and to engage in constructive negotiations in order to overcome the present stalemate; regrets the fact that the meeting of the Joint Control Commission which took place in Vladikavkaz on 12-13 October 2006 did not yield any results;
meni, da sta popolna demilitarizacija in razorožitev na spornem območju, razen skupnih mirovnih sil Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi, bistveni za preprečevanje spora ter prvi nujni korak k nadaljnjim ukrepom za krepitev zaupanja;
Takes the view that the full demilitarisation of and a reduction in the number of weapons in the conflict area, with the exception of the OSCE joint peacekeeping force, is a fundamental element of conflict prevention and a first essential step towards further confidence-building measures;
poudarja, da so za reševanje ozemeljskih sporov v Gruziji nujne nepristranske in učinkovite mirovne operacije; v zvezi s tem z zanimanjem preučuje nove predloge o obstoječih tristranskih skupnih mirovnih silah, nameščenih na spornem območju okoli mirovne črte med Gruzijo in Južno Osetijo; opozarja, da bi morale nove mirovne sile za boj proti kriminalu in anarhiji imeti tudi podporo policije; poudarja, da mora biti EU pripravljena svoje čete po potrebi nameniti mirovnim silam;
Stresses that neutral, effective and impartial peacekeeping operations are essential for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia; looks with interest, in that connection, to new proposals concerning the existing tripartite joint peacekeeping force deployed in the conflict area around the ceasefire line between Georgia and South Ossetia; points out that a new force should incorporate an element of police support, to combat crime and lawlessness; underlines that the EU should be prepared, if necessary, to commit troops to a new peacekeeping force;
meni, da je nepošteno in diskriminatorno, da državljani Južne Osetije z ruskimi potnimi listi lažje potujejo v EU kot Gruzijci, kar še povečuje napetosti v Južni Osetiji in ne spodbuja rešitve spora;
Considers it unfair and discriminatory that South Ossetian citizens holding Russian passports can travel to the EU more easily than Georgians, a state of affairs which contributes to increased tensions over the South Ossetian region and acts as a disincentive to a settlement of the dispute;
poziva ruske oblasti, naj prekliče vse ukrepe, ki jih je nedavno uvedla proti Gruziji in gruzijskemu narodu na njenem ozemlju; poleg tega poziva ruske oblasti, naj prekličejo neutemeljeno prepoved uvoza proizvodov iz Moldavije in Gruzije;
Calls on the Russian authorities to rescind all the measures recently taken against Georgia and against the Georgian population on its territory; calls, further, on the Russian authorities to lift their unjustified import ban on products from Moldova and Georgia;
poziva Svet, naj si še naprej na vse načine prizadeva za zmanjšanje napetosti in okrepitev zaupanja med Gruzijo in Rusko federacijo ter prepreči stopnjevanje diplomatskih sporov; odločno poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj najdeta način, kako Gruziji pomagati pri premagovanju in blažitvi gospodarskih ter družbenih posledic ukrepov iz Moskve;
Calls on the Council to keep on making every effort to defuse the tension and rebuild confidence between Georgia and the Russian Federation and prevent the present diplomatic crisis from escalating further; urges the Council and the Commission to find ways to help Georgia overcome and counterbalance the economic and social repercussions of the measures taken in Moscow;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj vprašanje zamrznjenih sporov in njihovo reševanje vključita v dnevni red naslednjega vrha EU–Rusija;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to include the question of frozen conflicts and their resolution on the agenda for the next EU-Russia summits;
pozdravlja sklenitev in podpis akcijskega načrta za Gruzijo v okviru evropske sosedske politike; pričakuje, da bo njegovo izvajanje še bolj spodbudilo politični proces in proces reforme v tej državi; pozdravlja izjave visokega predstavnika za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko Javierja Solane, ki je pred kratkim potrdil, da želi biti EU dejavnejša pri reševanju sporov v Gruziji, ter poziva Svet, naj imenuje posebnega predstavnika EU za Južni Kavkaz, ki bo imel vsa potrebna sredstva za učinkovitejše in vidnejše reševanje sporov;
Welcomes the conclusion and the signing of the ENP Action Plan for Georgia; expects that its implementation will give a further boost to the political and reform process in that country; welcomes the statements by the High Representative for the CFSP Javier Solana, who recently said that the EU intends to become more actively engaged in the resolution of conflicts in Georgia, and calls on the Council to provide the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus with all the necessary means and resources to make this action more effective and visible;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, generalnima sekretarjema Nata in Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi, gruzijskemu predsedniku in parlamentu, predsedniku in parlamentu Ruske federacije ter dejanskim oblastem Južne Osetije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the OSCE, the President and Parliament of Georgia, the President and Parliament of the Russian Federation and the de facto authorities in South Ossetia.
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam in Vytautas Landsbergis v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Charles Tannock, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi, Tunne Kelam and Vytautas Landsbergis, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jelko Kacin, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs in Henrik Lax v imenu skupine ALDE
– Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jelko Kacin, Marios Matsakis, Georgs Andrejevs and Henrik Lax, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Helmuth Markov v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
– Helmuth Markov, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
– Adam Jerzy Bielan, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk in Janusz Wojciechowski v imenu skupine UEN
– Adam Jerzy Bielan, Hanna Foltyn-Kubicka, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Zdzisław Zbigniew Podkański, Konrad Szymański, Inese Vaidere, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Zbigniew Krzysztof Kuźmiuk and Janusz Wojciechowski, on behalf of the UEN Group
o Moldaviji (Pridnestrju)
on Moldova (Transnistria)
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o položaju v Moldaviji ter v Pridnestrju, zlasti resolucije z dne 16. marca 2006,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Moldova and the situation in Transnistria, and in particular that of 16 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Moldavijo in Evropsko unijo, ki je začel veljati 1. julija 1998,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between Moldova and the European Union, which entered into force on 1 July 1998,
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta evropske sosedske politike za Moldavijo, sprejetega 22. februarja 2006, ki določa usmeritev za strateško sodelovanje med Republiko Moldavijo in Evropsko unijo,
having regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan for Moldova, which sets the direction for strategic cooperation between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union, adopted on 22 February 2006,
ob upoštevanju izjav Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi na vrhu v Istanbulu leta 1999 in zasedanja ministrskega sveta v Oportu leta 2002,
having regard to the statements of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) at the 1999 Summit in Istanbul and the 2002 Ministerial Council meeting in Oporto,
ob upoštevanju ukrajinske pobude "Z demokracijo do rešitve", ki jo je aprila 2005 predstavil ukrajinski predsednik Viktor Juščenko,
having regard to the Ukrainian initiative 'Towards a Resolution through Democracy', launched by the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, in April 2005,
ob upoštevanju izjave predsedstva 18. septembra 2006 o "referendumu" v pridnestrski regiji Republike Moldavije,
having regard to the Presidency statement of 18 September 2006 on the 'referendum' in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova,
ker je v moldavski regiji Pridnestrje 17. septembra 2006 potekal "referendum" za popolno neodvisnost regije ter morebitno združitev z Rusko federacijo;
whereas a 'referendum' took place in the Moldovan region of Transnistria on 17 September 2006, aimed at full independence for the region and its possible unification with the Russian Federation,
ker mednarodna skupnost ni priznala "referenduma" niti njegovih izidov, saj ga je povsem enostransko izvedel represivni režim v Pridnestrju ter s tem onemogočil možnosti za dogovor o politični rešitvi spora v Moldaviji, ter ker so bili zavajajoči ton vprašanj ter neizpolnjevanje osnovnih zahtev za svobodne in poštene volitve, kot so svoboda medijev, svoboda zbiranja in politični pluralizem, ocenjeni, da vnaprej določajo izid referenduma,
whereas neither this 'referendum' nor its outcome were accepted by the international community, as it was organised in a completely unilateral manner by the repressive regime of Transnistria, thus blocking the possibilities for a negotiated political solution to the conflict in Moldova, and as the suggestive character of the questions and the failure to meet basic requirements for free and fair elections such as freedom of the media, freedom of assembly and political pluralism were considered as predetermining the outcome of the referendum,
ker je spor med separatistično oblastjo v Pridnestrju in osrednjo vlado v Moldaviji bistveno prispeval k nestabilnosti vse države,
whereas the conflict between the separatist authority of Transnistria and the central government in Moldova has largely contributed to the instability in the whole country,
ker od leta 1992 potekajo pogajanja o statusu Pridnestrja v tako imenovani obliki 5+2, kjer sodelujejo Moldavija, njena regija Pridnestrje, Rusija, Ukrajina in Organizacija za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter Evropska unija in Združene države Amerike kot opazovalki; ker so bila pogajanja aprila 2006 prekinjena,
whereas negotiations concerning the status of Transnistria have been ongoing since 1992, in the so called 'Five-Plus-Two Format', in which Moldova, the Transnistrian region of Moldova, Russia, Ukraine and the OSCE are participating, with the EU and the USA as observers; whereas in April 2006 the negotiations broke down,
ker je Evropska unija pred nedavnim naredila pomembne korake, da bi okrepila svoje delovanje v Republiki Moldaviji in pospešila iskanje rešitve spora v Pridnestrju, in sicer z odprtjem stalne delegacije Evropske komisije v Kišinjevu, z imenovanjem posebnega predstavnika EU za Moldavijo, ki naj bi prispeval k trajni rešitvi spora v Pridnestrju, in z ustanovitvijo misije EU za pomoč na mejah v Moldaviji in Ukrajini,
whereas the European Union took important steps recently to enhance its engagement with the Republic of Moldova and the search for a resolution of the Transnistrian conflict, by opening a permanent European Commission delegation in Chisinau, appointing an EU Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova with a mandate to contribute to a sustainable settlement of the Transnistrian conflict and establishing an EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Moldova and Ukraine,
ker je glede na poročilo ZN o človekovem razvoju za leto 2005 Moldavija najrevnejša evropska država in ker je položaj v Pridnestrju velika ovira za družbeno-ekonomski razvoj države,
whereas, according to the UN's 2005 Human Development Report, Moldova is the poorest country in Europe and the situation with regard to Transnistria is a major hindrance to the country's socio-economic development,
ker je Ruska federacija v začetku leta prepovedala uvoz kmetijskih proizvodov (vina, sadja in zelenjave) iz Moldavije in Gruzije, kar zlasti škoduje gospodarskemu razvoju obeh držav,
whereas at the beginning of this year the Russian Federation imposed a ban on the import of agricultural products (wine, fruit and vegetables) from Moldova and Georgia, which is particularly harmful to the economic development of both countries,
ker enostranskih gibanj za neodvisnost v Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji ne podpira nobena mednarodna organizacija in ker pod okriljem Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi in Združenih narodov še naprej potekajo prizadevanja za obnovo suverenosti in ozemeljske celovitosti Moldavije in Gruzije,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation, and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Moldova and Georgia,
močno obsoja poskus moldavske regije Pridnestrje, da z izvedbo tako imenovanega referenduma enostransko doseže samostojnost;
Strongly denounces the attempt in the Moldovan region of Transnistria to establish its independence in a unilateral way by organising a so-called referendum;