natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
14. pozdravlja soglasno sprejetje resolucije o razmerah na področju človekovih pravic v Libiji na 15. izrednem zasedanju 25. februarja, v katerem obsojamo grobe in sistematične kršitve človekovih pravic v Libiji, in opozarja, da bi nekatere od teh kršitev utegnile soditi med zločine proti človečnosti; poziva, naj se v Libijo pošlje neodvisno mednarodno komisijo, ki bi preiskala vse domnevne kršitve mednarodnega humanitarnega prava v tej državi, in generalni skupščini priporoča, naj preuči začasen preklic članstva Libije v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice;
Welcomes the adoption by consensus of a resolution on the human rights situation in Libya in the 15th Special Session on 25 February which condemns the gross and systematic human rights violations committed in Libya pointing out that some of which may amount to crimes against humanity, calls for the dispatching of an independent international commission of inquiry to Libya to investigate all alleged violations of international human rights law in the country and recommends to the General Assembly the consideration of the suspension of Libya's membership to the UNHCR;
17. glede na poročila posebnih poročevalcev o stanju človekovih pravic v Demokratični ljudski republiki Koreji in v Mjanmarju/Burmi ponavlja poziv EU, naj javno podpre ustanovitev preiskovalnih komisij OZN, ki bodo ocenile kršitve človekovih pravic v teh državah in presodile, v kolikšnem obsegu gre za zločine proti človečnosti; obžaluje, ker Demokratična ljudska republika Koreja ne sodeluje s posebnim poročevalcem, in zahteva podaljšanje mandata posebnega poročevalca za Mjanmar/Burmo;
In view of the reports by the Special Rapporteurs on the situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, and on the human rights situation in Myanmar/Burma, restates its call for the EU to publicly support the establishment of UN commissions of inquiry to assess human rights violations in these countries and to assess to what extent these constitute crimes against humanity; regrets the lack of cooperation of DPRK with the Special Rapporteur and requests the extension of the mandate of the Special rapporteur for Myanmar/Burma;
23. vztraja, da je v Svetu za človekove pravice nujno treba ohraniti prostor za civilno družbo, da bi povečali njeno sodelovanje v dialogu in nevladnim organizacijam dali nove priložnosti, da vzpostavijo dialog s posameznimi državami;
Insists that it is essential to maintain a space for civil society into the HRC in order to enhance civil society participation in the dialogue, opening up new opportunities for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to enter into dialogue within particular States;
27. obžaluje, da prvi krog pregleda v nekaterih državah ni izpolnil pričakovanj, da bo to pregleden, neselektiven in nekonflikten postopek; glede tega priznava vlogo, ki so jo imele države članice EU pri prizadevanjih, da bi presegle blokovski način razmišljanja, spodbuja države članice EU, naj zagotovijo tehnično pomoč za lažje uresničevanje priporočil;
Regrets that the first cycle of the review of certain countries has not lived up to the expectations of a transparent, non-selective and non-confrontational process; acknowledges in this regard the role EU Member States have played in trying to break through the "bloc mentality", encourages EU Member States to provide technical assistance to help the recommendations be implemented;
30. obsoja poskuse, da bi omajali neodvisnost posebnih postopkov, s tem ko bi vlade postavili v vloge nadzornika, in poudarja, da bi kakršen koli nadzor spolitiziral in zmanjšal učinkovitost tega sistema;
30.Condemns attempts to undermine the independence of Special Procedures by putting governments in an oversight position over the Special Procedures, stresses that any sort of control would politicise and damage the effectiveness of the system;
36. pozdravlja prireditev, ki jo je delegacija EU pripravila ob robu glavnega dogajanja v obeležitev 25. obletnice institucije posebnega poročevalca za svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja; poziva, naj si z glavnimi pobudniki resolucije o razžalitvi prizadeva najti alternativo, ki bo predstavljena;
Welcome the side event organised by EU delegation to sponsor a side event to commemorate the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; requests to engage with the main sponsors of the resolution to find an alternative to the resolution on defamation that will be presented;
40. obžaluje, da je pogost stranski učinek prizadevanj EU za soglasje zmanjševanje njenih ambicij, in meni, da bi se morala odločneje zavzemati za resolucije o posameznih državah in jih odločneje vlagati;
Regrets that as a side-effect of its efforts to seek consensus, the EU often appears to be lowering its ambitions, and believes the EU should be much bolder in putting forward and/or running with country resolutions;
42. na praktični ravni opozarja, da je pomembno imeti v Ženevi in New Yorku večjo in dobro financirano delegacijo EU; poudarja, da mora biti dogajanje v Ženevi in New Yorku sestavni del zunanje politike EU, pri kateri naj bo v žarišču izboljšanje notranje usklajenosti, ob tem pa tudi poudarja, da morata biti dvo- in mnogostranska raven dobro prepleteni;
Draws attention, on a practical level, to the importance of having a larger, well-resourced EU Delegation in Geneva and New York; stresses that what happens in Geneva and New York must be an integral part of EU foreign policy, with a focus on improving internal co-ordination and stresses, too, the need for good interplay between the bilateral and multilateral levels;
46. naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Varnostnemu svetu OZN, generalnemu sekretarju OZN, predsedujočemu 64. generalne skupščine, predsedniku Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, visoki komisarki OZN za človekove pravice ter delovni skupini EU-OZN, ki jo je ustanovil odbor za zunanje zadeve.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Security Council, the UN Secretary-General, the President of the 64th General Assembly, the President of the UN Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the EU-UN Working Group established by the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
o stališču in prednostnih nalogah Parlamenta v zvezi s 16. zasedanjem Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in pregledom za leto 2011
on Parliament’s position on and priorities for the 16th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the 2011 review
PE459.700v01-00 B7‑0162/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o stališču Parlamenta v zvezi s 16. zasedanjem Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in pregledom za leto 2011
PE459.700v01-00 B7‑0162/2011 European Parliament resolution on Parliament’s position on and priorities for the 16th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the 2011 review
– ob upoštevanju svojih preteklih resolucij o Svetu Združenih narodov za človekove pravice (UNHRC), zlasti resolucije z dne 25. januarja 2010 o 13. zasedanju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0036 .
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), in particular its resolution of 25 February 2010 on the 13th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council Texts Adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0036 .
, resolucij z dne 16. marca 2006 o izidu pogajanj o Svetu za človekove pravice in 62. zasedanju Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice Sprejeto besedilo, P6_TA(2006)0097 .
as well as those of 16 March 2006 on the outcome of the negotiations on the Human Rights Council and on the 62nd Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0097 .
, resolucije z dne 9. junija 2005 o reformi Združenih narodov Sprejeto besedilo, P6_TA(2005)0237 .
, of 9 June 2005 on the reform of the United Nations Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0237 .
, resolucije z dne 29. septembra 2005 o rezultatih svetovnega vrha Združenih narodov, ki je potekal od 14. do 16. septembra 2005 Sprejeto besedilo, P6_TA(2005)0362 .
, of 29 September 2005 on the outcome of the United Nations World Summit of 14-16 September 2005 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0362 .
, in resolucije z dne 7. maja 2009 o letnem poročilu o človekovih pravicah po svetu v letu 2009 in politiki EU na tem področju Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0489 .
and of 7 May 2009 on the annual report on Human Rights in the World 2009 and the European Union’s policy on the matter Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0489 .
– ob upoštevanju preteklih rednih in izrednih zasedanj UNHRC ter prejšnjih krogov splošnega rednega pregleda,
– having regard to the previous regular and special sessions of the UNHRC, as well as previous rounds of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR),
– ob upoštevanju 16. zasedanja Sveta za človekove pravice ter enajstega kroga splošnega rednega pregleda, ki je predviden od 2. do 13. maja 2011,
– having regard to the 16th Session of the UNHRC and to the 11th round of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) to be held from 2 to 13 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju institucionalnih sprememb zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, zlasti ustanovitve Evropske službe za zunanjepolitično delovanje ter uvedbe funkcije visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko,
– having regard to the institutional changes brought about by the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, particularly the establishment of the European External Action Service and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
B. ker je Svet za človekove pravice edinstvena platforma, specializirana za splošne človekove pravice, in poseben forum, ki se ukvarja s človekovimi pravicami v sistemu OZN; ker sta mu zaupani pomembna naloga ter odgovornost za krepitev uveljavljanja, varstva in spoštovanja človekovih pravic v svetu,
B. whereas the UNHRC is a unique platform specialising in universal human rights and a specific forum dealing with human rights within the UN system; whereas it is entrusted with the important task and responsibility of strengthening the promotion, protection and respect of human rights around the globe,
C. ker pregled Sveta za človekove pravice poteka dvoslojno, saj se o statusu tega organa razpravlja v New Yorku, o postopkih pa v Ženevi; ker si morajo ob tem vsi mednarodni akterji prizadevati, da bodo odpravljena dvojna merila ter da se bosta preprečili selektivnost in politizacija problematike človekovih pravic,
C. whereas the review of the UNHRC is following two tracks, with the status of the body being discussed in New York, and the procedures in Geneva; whereas, at the same time, all international actors have to work for the elimination of double standards and the avoidance of selectivity and politicisation in the consideration of human rights issues,
D. ker se države ne smejo več izgovarjati na suverenost in notranjo pristojnost, da bi se izognile preiskavam na področju človekovih pravic,
D. whereas issues of sovereignty and domestic jurisdiction can no longer be used to shield states from scrutiny on their human rights records,
F. ker je v Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje predvidena ustanovitev direktorata za človekove pravice in demokracijo,
F. whereas the setting up of a directorate for Human Rights and Democracy within the EEAS,
2. pozdravlja dejstvo, da so med drugim na dnevnem redu 16. rednega zasedanja poročila o pravicah ljudi, ki pripadajo nacionalnim, etničnim, verskim ali jezikovnim manjšinam, o spodbujanju in varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v boju proti terorizmu ter razširjena srečanja o otrokovih pravicah;
Welcomes the fact that on the agenda of the 16th regular Session are, among others, reports on the ‘Rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities’, and on the ‘Promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism’, as well as extensive meetings on the rights of the child;
9. je zaskrbljen, ker Svet za človekove pravice pri učinkovitejšem opravljanju njegovega mandata najbolj ovira blokovska politika, ki pogosto prevlada, ter njen vpliv na izbiro držav in razmer, ki jim bo Svet namenil svojo pozornost; ponovno poudarja, da je zmožnost tega organa, da učinkovito obravnava razmere v posameznih državah, osrednjega pomena za njegovo avtoriteto in verodostojnost;
Is concerned that the greatest obstacle to the UNHRC taking up its mandate more effectively is the ‘bloc politics’ which often dominates, and its impact on the selection of countries and situations receiving UNHRC attention; reiterates the view that the UNHRC’s ability to address country situations effectively and in a timely and adequate manner as it is central to its authority and credibility;
11. pozdravlja pobudo ZDA o uvedbi državne resolucije o Iranu; poziva države članice EU, naj močno podprejo vzpostavitev posebnega mehanizma za Iran; poziva visoko predstavnico in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj uskladita sodelovanje med EU in ZDA pri skupnih vprašanjih glede človekovih pravic, pri čemer mora EU, če želi biti učinkovita in verodostojna, delovati popolnoma neodvisno;
Welcomes the initiative of the US to introduce a country resolution on Iran; calls upon the EU Member States to strongly support the instalment of a Special Mechanism regarding Iran; calls upon the High Representative and the EEAS to coordinate the cooperation between the EU and the United States on human rights issues of common concern, while the EU should act fully independently in order to be effective and credible;
25. vztraja, da je v Svetu za človekove pravice nujno treba ohraniti prostor za civilno družbo, da bi povečali sodelovanje civilne družbe v tem dialogu in nevladnim organizacijam omogočili nove priložnosti, da vzpostavijo dialog s posameznimi državami;
Insists that it is essential to maintain a space for civil society into the HRC in order to enhance civil society participation in the dialogue, opening up new opportunities for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to enter into dialogue within particular States;
29. obžaluje, da prvi krog pregleda v nekaterih državah ni izpolnil pričakovanj, da bo to pregleden, neselektiven in nekonflikten proces; glede tega priznava vlogo ki so jo imele držav članic EU pri prizadevanjih, da bi presegli blokovski način razmišljanja, države članice EU pa spodbuja, naj zagotovijo tehnično pomoč za lažje uresničevanje priporočil;
Regrets that the first cycle of the review of certain countries has not lived up to the expectations of a transparent, non-selective and non-confrontational process; acknowledges in this regard the role EU Member States have played in trying to break through the ‘bloc mentality’, encourages EU Member States to provide technical assistance to help the recommendations be implemented;
32. obsoja poskuse, da bi omajali neodvisnost posebnih postopkov, s tem ko bi vlade postavili v vloge nadzornika, in poudarja, da bi kakršen koli nadzor spolitiziral in zmanjšal učinkovitost tega sistema;
Condemns attempts to undermine the independence of Special Procedures by putting governments in an oversight position over the Special Procedures, stresses that any sort of control would politicise and damage the effectiveness of the system;
44. na praktični ravni opozarja, da je pomembno imeti v Ženevi in New Yorku večjo delegacijo EU, ki bi bila dobro podprta s sredstvi; poudarja, da mora biti dogajanje v Ženevi in New Yorku sestavni del zunanje politike EU, pri kateri naj bo v žarišču izboljšanje notranje usklajenosti, ob tem pa tudi poudarja, da morata biti dvo- in mnogostranska raven dobro prepleteni;
Draws attention, on a practical level, to the importance of having a larger, well-resourced EU Delegation in Geneva and New York; stresses that what happens in Geneva and New York must be an integral part of EU foreign policy, with a focus on improving internal co-ordination and stresses, too, the need for good interplay between the bilateral and multilateral levels;
46. pooblašča svojo delegacijo na 16. zasedanju Sveta za človekove pravice, naj posreduje pomisleke iz te resolucije; delegacijo poziva, naj o svojem obisku poroča pododboru za človekove pravice, in meni, da mora Evropski parlament nujno še naprej pošiljati svoje delegacije zasedanja Sveta za človekove pravice;
Mandates its delegation to the 16th Session of the UNHRC to voice the concerns expressed in this resolution; calls on the delegation to report to the Subcommittee on Human Rights regarding its visit, and considers it indispensable to continue sending a European Parliament delegation to relevant sessions of the UNHRC;
48. naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje podpredsednici Komisije/visoki predstavnici Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, varnostnemu svetu OZN, generalnemu sekretarju OZN, predsedujočemu 64. generalne skupščine, predsedniku Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, visoki komisarki OZN za človekove pravice ter delovni skupini EU-OZN, ki jo je ustanovil odbor za zunanje zadeve.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission/ High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Security Council, the UN Secretary-General, the President of the 64th General Assembly, the President of the UN Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the EU-UN Working Group established by the Committee on Foreign Affairs.
o stališču in prednostnih nalogah Parlamenta v zvezi s 16. zasedanjem Sveta ZN za človekove pravice in pregledom za leto 2011
on Parliament’s position on and priorities for the 16th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the 2011 review
PE459.701v01-00 B7‑0163/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o stališču Parlamenta v zvezi s 16. zasedanjem Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in pregledom za leto 2011
PE459.701v01-00 B7‑0163/2011 European Parliament resolution on Parliament’s position on and priorities for the 16th Session of the UN Human Rights Council and the 2011 review
– ob upoštevanju svojih preteklih resolucij o Svetu Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, zlasti resolucije z dne 25. januarja 2010 o 13. zasedanju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice, vključno z vlogo EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0036 .
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), in particular its resolution of 25 February 2010 on the 13th Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council Texts Adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2010)0036 .
, resolucije z dne 14. januarja 2009 o razvoju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in vlogi EU Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0021 .
, and of 14 January 2009 on the development of the new Human Rights Council, including the role of the EU Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2009)0021 .
, resolucij z dne 16. marca 2006 o izidu pogajanj o Svetu za človekove pravice in 62. zasedanju Komisije OZN za človekove pravice Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0097 .
as well as those of 16 March 2006 on the outcome of the negotiations on the Human Rights Council and on the 62nd Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0097 .
in resolucije z dne 7. maja 2009 o letnem poročilu o človekovih pravicah po svetu za leto 2009 in politiki Evropske unije na tem področju Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0489 .
and of 7 May 2009 on the annual report on Human Rights in the World 2009 and the European Union’s policy on the matter Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0489 .
– ob upoštevanju resolucije generalne skupščine Združenih narodov A/RES/60/251 o ustanovitvi Sveta za človekove pravice,
– having regard to United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/60/251 establishing the Human Rights Council (UNHRC),
– ob upoštevanju 16. zasedanja Sveta za človekove pravice ter 11. kroga splošnega rednega pregleda, ki je predviden od 2. do 13. maja 2011,
– having regard to the 16th Session of the UNHRC and to the 11th round of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) to be held from 2 to 13 May 2011,
– ob upoštevanju institucionalnih sprememb zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, zlasti ustanovitve Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje ter funkcije visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko,
– having regard to the institutional changes brought about by the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, particularly the establishment of the European External Action Service and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,
C. ker pregled Sveta za človekove pravice poteka dvotirno, saj se o statusu tega organa razpravlja v New Yorku, o postopkih pa v Ženevi; ker se morajo obenem vsi mednarodni akterji truditi, da bodo odpravljena dvojna merila ter da se bosta preprečili selektivnost in politizacija pri obravnavi problematike človekovih pravic,
C. whereas the review of the UNHRC is following two tracks, with the status of the body being discussed in New York, and the procedures in Geneva; whereas, at the same time, all international actors have to work for the elimination of double standards and the avoidance of selectivity and politicization in the consideration of human rights issues,
D. ker se države ne morejo več izgovarjati na suverenost in nacionalno pristojnost, da bi se izognile nadzoru stanja človekovih pravic v njihovi državi,
D. whereas issues of sovereignty and domestic jurisdiction can no longer be used to shield states from scrutiny on their human rights records,
E. ker bi morala imeti Evropska unija v Združenih narodih na splošno ter še zlasti v Svetu za človekove pravice vlogo globalnega akterja, in ker bi novi pristop, ki ga predstavlja nova Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje, moral pomagati Uniji, da bi bila učinkovitejša ter prepoznavna pri skladnem, doslednem in učinkovitem sprejemanju in obravnavi globalnih izzivov,
E. whereas the European Union should act as a global player in the context of the UN generally and the UNHCR specifically, and a new approach embodied in the new European External Action Service (EEAS) should be instrumental in helping the Union to act more effectively and recognizable to meet and address global challenges in a coherent, consistent and efficient manner,
F. ker je bil v okviru Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje ustanovljen direktorat za človekove pravice in demokracijo,
F. whereas a directorate for Human Rights and Democracy was set up within the EEAS,
2. odobrava, da so na dnevnem redu 16. rednega zasedanja med drugim poročila o pravicah ljudi, ki pripadajo nacionalnim, etničnim, verskim ali jezikovnim manjšinam, o uveljavljanju in varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v boju proti terorizmu ter številna srečanja o pravicah otrok;
Welcomes the fact that on the agenda of the 16th regular Session are, among others, reports on the ‘Rights of persons belonging to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities’, and on the ‘Promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism’, as well as extensive meetings on the rights of the child;
4 pozdravlja novi direktorat za človekove pravice in demokracijo ter podpira vzpostavitev delovne skupine Sveta EU za človekove pravice, ki bo vključevala strokovnjake s področja človekovih pravic iz vseh 27 držav članic EU in bo imela sedež v Bruslju, saj je Bruselj bolj primerna lokacija za spremljanje politik EU, pomagala pa bo organizirati večstransko delo v razmerju do dvostranskega dela;
4 Welcomes the new directorate for Human Rights and Democracy and supports the establishment of a Brussels-based EU Council Working group on Human Rights (COHOM) that would include human rights experts from all 27 EU Member States as Brussels is better placed for monitoring EU policies and which will help to organise multilateral work in relation to bilateral work;