natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja prehod na instrumente območja SEPA ter zagotovi, da ne bo povzročil dražjega plačilnega sistema za državljane EU;
Calls on the Commission to monitor the migration to SEPA instruments and ensure that it does not result in a more expensive payment system for EU citizens;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropski centralni banki ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank and the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States.
B7-0154 , 0158 , 0173 , 0179 in 0180/2010
B7-0154 , 0158 , 0173 , 0179 and 0180/2010
ob upoštevanju členov 207 in 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Articles 207 and 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
having regard to its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission for the next legislative term Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. marca 2009 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev) kot stališča Evropskega parlamenta v prvi obravnavi Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0114 .
having regard to its resolution of 11 March 2009 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast), to be considered as Parliament's position at first reading Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0114 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. decembra 2008 o vplivu ponarejanja na mednarodno trgovino Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0634 .
having regard to its resolution of 18 December 2008 on the impact of counterfeiting on international trade Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0634 .
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 22. februarja 2010 o potekajočih pogajanjih Evropske unije o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
having regard to the European Data Protection Supervisor's Opinion of 22 February 2010 on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA),
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti člena 8 te listine,
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. julija 2002 o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009,
having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju),
having regard to Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (‘Directive on Electronic Commerce’),
ker so leta 2008 Evropska unija in druge države OECD začele pogajanja o novem večstranskem sporazumu za krepitev in uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine ter boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu (trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju – sporazum ACTA) ter se skupaj dogovorile za klavzulo o varovanju tajnosti,
whereas in 2008 the European Union and other OECD countries opened negotiations on a new multilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and combat counterfeiting and piracy (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement – ACTA), and jointly agreed on a confidentiality clause,
ker je Parlament v svojem poročilu z dne 11. marca 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj nemudoma omogoči javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju,
whereas in its report of 11 March 2009 Parliament called on the Commission to ‘immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available’,
ker je Komisija 27. januarja 2010 zagotovila, da je zavezana okrepljenemu sodelovanju s Parlamentom v skladu z resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu s Komisijo, v kateri poziva k „neposrednem in celovitem zagotavljanju informacij Parlamentu na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih [...], zlasti o trgovinskih zadevah in drugih pogajanjih v okviru postopka odobritve, tako da se zagotovi polna učinkovitosti člena 218 PDEU“,
whereas on 27 January 2010 the Commission provided assurances as to its commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament, in line with Parliament's resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement with the Commission calling for ‘immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements (...), in particular on trade matters and other negotiations involving the consent procedure, (...) to give full effect to Article 218 of the TFEU’,
ker so se predstavniki Sveta udeležili krogov pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA skupaj s predstavniki Komisije,
whereas Council representatives have attended rounds of ACTA negotiations alongside Commission representatives,
ker na podlagi dokumentov, ki so prišli v javnost, pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA med drugim obravnavajo nastajajočo zakonodajo EU o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine 2005/0127(COD) – kazenski ukrepi za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine (IPRED-II)) in tako imenovani telekomunikacijski paket ter veljavno zakonodajo EU o elektronskem poslovanju in varstvu podatkov,
whereas, according to documents leaked, the ACTA negotiations touch on, among other things, pending EU legislation regarding the enforcement of IPRs (2005/0127 (COD) – Criminal measures aimed at assuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED-II)) and the so-called ‘Telecoms Package’ and on existing EU legislation regarding e-commerce and data protection,
ker trgovinska pogajanja, ki ne sodijo med običajne postopke odločanja v EU, ne bi smela zaobiti prizadevanj EU za uskladitev ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine,
whereas the ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures should not be circumvented by trade negotiations which are outside the scope of normal EU decision-making processes,
ker je nujno treba zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine oblikujejo tako, da ne bodo ovirali inovacij ali konkurence, spodkopavali omejitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, omejevali prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjevali zakonitega trgovanja,
whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade,
ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima EU v zvezi z zakonodajo o zasebnosti in varstvu podatkov, kakor je določeno zlasti v Direktivi 95/46/ES, Direktivi 2002/58/ES ter sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection law, notably as set out in Directive 95/46/EC, Directive 2002/58/EC and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU),
ker od 1. decembra 2009 velja Lizbonska pogodba,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty has been in force since 1 December 2009,
ker bo moral Evropski parlament zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe dati odobritev za besedilo sporazuma ACTA, preden bo začel veljati v Evropski uniji,
whereas, as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, it will have to give its consent to the ACTA Treaty text prior to its entry into force in the EU,
ker se je Komisija zavezala, da bo Parlamentu neposredno in celovito zagotavljala informacije na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih,
whereas the Commission has committed itself to providing immediate and full information to Parliament at every stage of negotiations on international agreements,
poudarja, da ima Komisija od 1. decembra 2009 pravno obveznost, da nemudoma in v celoti obvešča Parlament na vseh stopnjah mednarodnih pogajanj;
Points out that since 1 December 2009 the Commission has had a legal obligation to inform Parliament immediately and fully at all stages of international negotiations;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad pomanjkanjem preglednega postopka pri vodenju pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA, kar je v nasprotju z duhom in črko PDEU; je zelo zaskrbljen, ker pred začetkom pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA ni bilo vzpostavljene pravne podlage in ker Parlament ni bil zaprošen, naj odobri pogajalski mandat;
Expresses its concern over the lack of a transparent process in the conduct of the ACTA negotiations, a state of affairs at odds with the letter and spirit of the TFEU; is deeply concerned that no legal base was established before the start of the ACTA negotiations and that parliamentary approval for the negotiating mandate was not sought;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj javnosti in Parlamentu omogočita dostop do besedil in povzetkov o pogajanjih o sporazumu ACTA v skladu s pogodbo in Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to grant public and parliamentary access to ACTA negotiation texts and summaries, in accordance with the Treaty and with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj dejavno sodelujeta s pogajalskimi partnerji pri sporazumu ACTA, da bodo preprečili morebitna nadaljnja pogajanja, ki so zaupne narave sama po sebi, ter naj pravočasno in v celoti obveščata Parlament o svojih pobudah v zvezi s tem; pričakuje, da bo Komisija pripravila predloge pred naslednjim krogom pogajanj na Novi Zelandiji aprila 2010 in bo zahtevala, da se vprašanje preglednosti uvrsti na dnevni red tega srečanja, ter da bo Parlament obvestila o izidu tega kroga pogajanj, takoj ko se bo končal;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to engage proactively with ACTA negotiation partners to rule out any further negotiations which are confidential as a matter of course and to inform Parliament fully and in a timely manner about its initiatives in this regard; expects the Commission to make proposals prior to the next negotiation round in New Zealand in April 2010, to demand that the issue of transparency is put on the agenda of that meeting and to refer the outcome of the negotiation round to Parliament immediately following its conclusion;
poudarja, da si Parlament pridržuje pravico do ustreznega ukrepanja, vključno z vložitvijo tožbe na Sodišču Evropske unije, da bi zaščitil svoje pristojnosti, če ne bo nemudoma in v celoti obveščen na vseh stopnjah pogajanj;
Stresses that, unless Parliament is immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, it reserves its right to take suitable action, including bringing a case before the Court of Justice in order to safeguard its prerogatives;
obžaluje namerno odločitev strani, da se ne bodo pogajale prek priznanih mednarodnih organizacij, kot sta Svetovna organizacija za intelektualno;
Deplores the calculated choice of the parties not to negotiate through well-established international bodies, such as WIPO and WTO, which have established frameworks for public information and consultation;
poziva Komisijo, naj opravi oceno učinka izvajanja sporazuma ACTA na področju temeljnih pravic in varstva podatkov, prizadevanj EU za uskladitev ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine in na področju e-poslovanja, preden EU sklene sporazum o prečiščenem besedilu sporazuma ACTA, in naj se pravočasno posvetuje s Parlamentom o rezultatih te ocene;
Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of the implementation of ACTA with regard to fundamental rights and data protection, ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures, and e-commerce, prior to any EU agreement on a consolidated ACTA treaty text, and to consult with Parliament in a timely manner about the results of the assessment;
pozdravlja zagotovilo Komisije, da bo sporazum ACTA vsekakor omejen na uveljavljanje obstoječih pravic intelektualne lastnine, brez poseganja v razvoj materialnega prava o intelektualni lastnini v Evropski uniji;
Welcomes affirmations by the Commission that any ACTA agreement will be limited to the enforcement of existing IPRs, with no prejudice for the development of substantive IP law in the European Union;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA in jih omeji na obstoječi evropski sistem uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine v boju proti ponarejanju; meni, da morajo nadaljnja pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA vključevati več držav v razvoju in držav v vzponu, da bi dosegli večstransko raven pogajanj;
Calls on the Commission to continue the negotiations on ACTA and limit them to the existing European IPR enforcement system against counterfeiting; considers that further ACTA negotiations should include a larger number of developing and emerging countries, with a view to reaching a possible multilateral level of negotiation;
meni, da predlagani sporazum zaradi spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, kot sta svoboda izražanja in pravica do zasebnosti, ter ob celovitem upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti ne sme omogočati nalaganja tako imenovanih postopkov treh opominov, pri tem pa se v celoti upošteva sklep Parlamenta o členu 1.1b Direktive (o spremembi) 2009/140/ES, ki poziva, naj se v člen 1 Direktive 2002/21/ES vstavi nov odstavek 3(a) v zvezi z vprašanjem politike postopka treh opominov; meni, da mora biti v vsakem sporazumu vključena določba, v skladu s katero zaprtje dostopa posameznikov do interneta predhodno preuči sodišče;
Considers that in order to respect fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of expression and the right to privacy, while fully observing the principle of subsidiarity, the proposed agreement should not make it possible for any so-called ‘three-strikes’ procedures to be imposed, in full accordance with Parliament's decision on Article 1.1b in the (amending) Directive 2009/140/EC calling for the insertion of a new paragraph 3(a) in Article 1 of Directive 2002/21/EC on the matter of the ‘three strikes’ policy; considers that any agreement must include the stipulation that the closing-off of an individual's Internet access shall be subject to prior examination by a court;
poudarja, da sta zasebnost in varstvo podatkov temeljni vrednoti Evropske unije, ki ju priznavajo člen 8 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah ter člena 7 in 8 Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah, in ju je treba spoštovati pri vseh politikah in predpisih, ki jih sprejme EU v skladu s členom 16 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Emphasises that privacy and data protection are core values of the European Union, recognised in Article 8 ECHR and Articles 7 and 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which must be respected in all the policies and rules adopted by the EU pursuant to Article 16 of the TFEU;
poudarja, da določbe sporazuma ACTA, zlasti ukrepi za povečanje pooblastil za čezmejne preglede in zasego blaga, ne bi smele vplivati na globalni dostop do zakonitih in varnih zdravil po zmernih cenah, vključno z inovativnimi in generičnimi zdravili, pod pretvezo boja proti ponarejanju;
Points out that ACTA provisions, notably measures aimed at strengthening powers for cross-border inspection and seizure of goods, should not affect global access to legitimate, affordable and safe medicinal products – including innovative and generic products – on the pretext of combating counterfeiting;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav, ki sodelujejo pri pogajanjih o sporazumu ACTA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the states party to the ACTA negotiations.
B7-0181 in 0182/2010
B7-0181 and 0182/2010
ob upoštevanju Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT), zlasti „razvojne klavzule“ iz leta 1979,
having regard to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and in particular the 1979 ‘enabling clause’,
ob upoštevanju svoje zakonodajne resolucije z dne 5. junija 2008 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 ( 2007/0289(CNS) ),
having regard to its legislative resolution of 5 June 2008 on the proposal for a Council regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 ( 2007/0289(CNS) ),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008,
ob upoštevanju poglavja 1 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU),
having regard to Chapter 1 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),
ob upoštevanju člena 207 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ker je „razvojna klavzula“ pravna podlaga Svetovne trgovinske organizacije za splošni sistem preferencialov (GSP),
whereas the ‘enabling clause’ is the WTO legal basis for the generalised system of preferences (GSP),
ker od leta 1971 Skupnost dodeljuje državam v razvoju trgovinske preferenciale v okviru svoje sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov,
whereas, since 1971, the Community has granted trade preferences to developing countries, within its scheme of generalised tariff preferences,
ker je bilo s Parlamentom opravljeno posvetovanje o predlogu Komisije za uredbo Sveta o splošnih tarifnih preferencialih za obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 ( KOM(2007)0857 ),
whereas Parliament was consulted on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on GSP for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 ( COM(2007)0857 ),
ker je 1. decembra 2009 začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty entered into force on 1 December 2009,
ker morajo v skladu s poglavjem 1 naslova V PEU Unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni voditi načela demokracije, pravne države, univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pospeševanja trajnostnega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega razvoja držav v razvoju s prednostnim ciljem izkoreninjenja revščine,
whereas, pursuant to Chapter 1 of Title V TEU, the Union's action on the international scene must be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law and the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and must foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty,
ker morata Parlament in Svet v skladu s členom 207 PDEU z uredbami, sprejetimi po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, sprejeti ukrepe, ki bodo določali okvir za izvajanje skupne trgovinske politike,
whereas, pursuant to Article 207 TFEU, Parliament and the Council, acting by means of regulations in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (OLP), must adopt the measures defining the framework for implementing the common commercial policy,
priznava pomen sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov, ki razvitim državam omogoča, da državam v razvoju ponudijo prednostno obravnavo njihovih izdelkov;
Recognises the importance of the GSP, which allows developed countries to offer non-reciprocal preferential treatment in respect of products originating in developing countries;
poudarja, da je Evropska skupnost uvedbo splošnega sistema preferencialov v letu 1971 pojasnila kot instrument za odpravo trgovinskih neravnovesij med razvitimi državami in državami v razvoju, ki naj bi prispeval k njihovemu trajnostnemu razvoju; meni, da je bil to trgovinski instrument ES in EU za pomoč državam v razvoju z ustvarjanjem prihodka z mednarodno trgovino, ki prispeva k njihovemu trajnostnemu razvoju in dobremu upravljanju;
Points out that the creation of the GSP by the European Community in 1971 was explained as being an instrument for resolving trade imbalances between developed and developing countries and was expected to contribute to their sustainable development; considers that it has been an EC and EU trade instrument to assist developing countries by generating revenue through international trade, thus contributing to their sustainable development and good governance;
ugotavlja, da bo sedanja uredba o splošnem sistemu preferencialov prenehala veljati 31. decembra 2011; zato ob upoštevanju časa, potrebnega za sprejetje nove uredbe po rednem zakonodajnem postopku, poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu do 1. junija 2010 predlaga revidirano uredbo o splošnem sistemu preferencialov;
Notes that the current GSP regulation will expire on 31 December 2011; therefore, taking into account the time necessary for the adoption of a new regulation under the OLP, calls on the Commission to propose a revised GSP regulation to the European Parliament and the Council by 1 June 2010;
meni, da bi morali biti dodeljeni preferenciali v okviru splošnega sistema preferencialov osredotočeni na države v razvoju, ki jih najbolj potrebujejo, tako bi moral nov seznam držav upravičenk odražati dejanske gospodarske razmere v državah v razvoju;
Considers that the preferences granted under the GSP should be targeted on the developing countries that need them most, so that the new list of beneficiary countries should reflect the actual economic situation of developing countries;
poudarja, da bi morale v skladu s členom 15(1) vse države upravičenke v okviru sheme GSP+ ne le ratificirati, ampak tudi učinkovito izvajati vseh 27 konvencij Mednarodne organizacije dela in OZN, navedenih v prilogi III k uredbi GSP;
Stresses that all countries benefiting from the GSP+ scheme should, under Article 15(1), not only ratify but also effectively implement all 27 ILO and UN conventions listed in Annex III to the GSP Regulation;
poudarja, da je treba povečati preglednost in demokratično odgovornost pri tem, kako se začnejo in vodijo preiskovalni procesi; zato poziva, naj ga Komisija v celoti obvešča in ustrezno vključi v vse ravni postopkov GSP in GSP+, vključno s predlogom Sveta o seznamu držav upravičenk;
Stresses the need for more transparency and democratic accountability on how the investigation processes are initiated and conducted; therefore asks to be fully informed and adequately involved by the Commission at all the various stages of GSP and GSP+ procedures, including with regard to the Council proposal on the lists of beneficiary countries;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno spremlja razmere v Šrilanki, in šrilanško vlado, naj hitro ukrepa za normalizacijo razmer v državi še pred dejanskim umikom sheme GSP+;
Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the situation in Sri Lanka and on the Sri Lankan Government to quickly react to normalise the situation in the country before the actual implementation of the suspension of GSP+;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno spremlja stanje človekovih pravic v Kolumbiji in o tem poroča Parlamentu;
Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the human rights situation in Colombia and to report to Parliament;