natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Svet, da razmisli o tem, da bi Svet za človekove pravice postal delovna skupina predstavnikov s sedežem v Bruslju; meni, da bi to omogočilo več časa za srečanja, boljše usklajevanje in tako verjetno večji nadzor nad politiko o človekovih pravicah EU v širšem smislu;
Asks the Council to consider making COHOM a working group with Brussels-based representatives; considers that this would allow more time for meetings, better coordination and thus, possibly, a tighter grip on EU human rights policies in the wider sense;
pozdravlja ustanovitev delovnih skupin za vzpostavitev institucij, upravno reformo, upravljanje in človekove pravice med EU in, v tem zaporedju, Bangladešem, Laosom in Vietnamom; na podlagi ocene o njihovi uspešnosti poziva Svet in Komisijo, da razširita ta pristop na druge tretje države, kot sta Kambodža in Nepal;
Welcomes the establishment of working groups on institution building, administrative reform, governance and human rights between the EU and, respectively, Bangladesh, Laos, and Vietnam; subject to an evaluation of their effectiveness, calls on the Council and the Commission to extend this approach to other third countries such as Cambodia and Nepal;
vztraja na prepričanju, da morajo vsi instrumenti, dokumenti in poročila s področja človekovih pravic, torej tudi letna poročila, biti zastavljeni tako, da izrecno izpostavljajo primere diskriminacije, problematiko narodnostnih manjšin, verske svobode, vključno z diskriminatorno prakso v primeru manjšinskih religij, pravic žensk, otrok, avtohtonih prebivalcev, invalidov, oseb s kognitivnimi motnjami, drugače spolno usmerjenih, pri čemer naj se zagotovi polno sodelovanje njihovih organizacij tako v EU kot v tretjih državah;
Insists that all human rights instruments, documents and reports including the Annual Reports need to address explicitly discrimination issues including the issues of ethnic minorities, religious freedoms including discriminatory practices towards minority religions, the human rights of women, the rights of children, the rights of indigenous peoples, disabled people including people with intellectual disabilities, and people with all sexual orientations, fully involving their organisations, both within the EU and in third countries where appropriate;
kar zadeva diskriminacije po spolu, ki še vedno obstaja, vztraja, da mora biti zaščita in spodbujanje pravic žensk vgrajena v vse politike Evropske unije na področju človekovih pravic;
Given the gender discrimination which still exists, insists that the protection and promotion of women's rights should be a cross-cutting policy in the European Union human rights agenda;
poziva Komisijo, da resno upošteva stališče Evropskega parlamenta, ki si prizadeva za poseben instrument za človekove pravice za 2007–2013; v zvezi s tem pričakuje prejem sporočila Komisije;
Calls on the Commission to take seriously into consideration the position of the European Parliament seeking a specific human rights instrument for 2007-2013; looks forward to receiving the Commission's communication in this matter;
poudarja pomembnost Evropske pobude za demokracijo in človekove pravice kot enega glavnih instrumentov, ki jih ima EU na voljo; poudarja zlasti prednost, da za programe EIDHR ni potrebna odobritev vlade države, kjer se program izvaja, in da je večina sredstev EDHR na voljo organizacijam civilne družbe;
Underlines the importance of the EIDHR as one of the chief instruments which the EU has at its disposal; emphasises in particular the advantage that EIDHR programmes do not require governmental approval in the country of implementation and that the majority of EIDHR funding is available for civil society organisations;
poudarja stališče, da je treba človekove pravice racionalizirati s štirimi zunanjimi akcijskimi finančnimi instrumenti in da je treba oblikovati peti posebni instrument za človekove pravice za dopolnitev tematskega načrtovanja;
Underlines its position that human rights must be streamlined throughout the four external action financial instruments and that a fifth specific instrument for human rights needs to be created in order to complement the thematic programming;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da so sedanja reforma Finančne uredbe Uredba Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1605/2002 z dne 25. junija o Finančni uredbi, ki se uporablja za splošni proračun Evropskih skupnosti (UL L 248, 16.9.2002, str.
Asks the Commission to ensure that the current reform of the Financial Regulation Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p.
in njena spremna izvedbena pravila dovolj daljnosežni za zmanjšanje pretiranega upravnega bremena in počasnosti pri posredovanju sredstev, ki zdaj bremenita EIDHR, da se manjšim temeljnim nevladnim organizacijam olajšata dostop do sredstev in upravljanje z njimi ter se v zameno poveča vpliv EIDHR;
and its accompanying implementing rules are sufficiently far-reaching, so as to reduce the excessive administrative burden and the slowness in delivering funds that currently plague the EIDHR, so as to make it easier for smaller, grassroots NGOs to access and manage funds and in turn to enhance the impact of the EIDHR;
pozdravlja sklepe poročila o oceni boja proti rasizmu, ksenofobiji in diskriminaciji, ki navajajo, da so cilj projektov, financiranih v okviru EIDHR, najbolj obrobne skupnosti, ki jih vlade ne dosežejo, ter da dosegajo precejšnje rezultate;
Welcomes the conclusions of the evaluation report on the campaign against racism, xenophobia and discrimination, stating that the projects funded under EIDHR target the most marginalised communities not reached by governments and that they show substantial results;
je zadovoljen, da je Komisija v letu 2005 prevzela obveznosti za več kot 125 000 000 EUR, in je zaskrbljen zaradi možnosti, da se ne bodo popolno in natančno izvajali vsi projekti, sklenjeni v letu 2005;
Is content that in 2005, the Commission was able to make commitments of over EUR 125 000 000 but is concerned about the possibility that not all the projects contracted in 2005 will be implemented fully and thoroughly;
zahteva, da Komisija in Svet sistematično spremljata misijo EU za opazovanje volitev, natančno nadzorujeta razmere po volitvah in, če je potrebno, sprejmeta politične ukrepe;
Requests the Commission and the Council to systematically follow up the EU election observation missions, closely monitor the post-election situation and take political action if necessary;
upošteva, da je bil velik delež (50,9 %) skupnih sredstev EIDHR za projekte, sklenjene v letu 2005, namenjen večjim projektom, organiziranim po temi, in le majhen delež (27,68%) je bil namenjen manjšim projektom, ki so jih izvajale delegacije Komisije; ponovno poudarja, da je treba znaten delež nameniti manjšim, osnovnim projektom; poziva Komisijo, da nameni posebno pozornost tistim nevladnim organizacijam, ki so ključne pri spodbujanju človekovih pravic v svojih državah, ampak jih oblasti v teh državah zakonsko ne priznavajo; meni, da je odločilno, da Komisija v zvezi s tem predlaga ponovni pregled finančne uredbe, vključno s financiranjem takšnih nevladnih organizacij;
Takes note that a large proportion (50,9 %) of the total EIDHR funding for projects contracted in 2005 went to large projects organised by theme and only a small proportion (27,68%) went to micro-projects implemented by Commission Delegations; reiterates that a significant proportion should be devoted to smaller, grassroots projects; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to those NGOs which play a key role in the promotion of human rights in their countries but which are not legally recognised by the authorities in those countries; regards it as crucial that the Commission should propose, in this regard, a review of the Financial Regulation including the financing of such NGOs;
v celoti podpira prispevek EU medvladnim organizacijam, ker lahko te organizacije bistveno prispevajo k spodbujanju demokracije in človekovih pravic, vseeno pa meni, da ta prispevek ne sme škodovati nevladnim organizacijam, ampak da EU raje prispeva v obliki strateškega dolgoročnega partnerstva;
Fully supports the EU contribution to intergovernmental organisations, as these organisations can make fundamental contributions to the promotion of democracy and human rights; considers, however, that this contribution should not be to the detriment of NGOs, but should rather take place through strategic long-term partnerships;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija spremenila postopke v zvezi z novimi razpisi za predloge v letu 2006 tako, da novi razpisi, ki temeljijo na "poročilih o konceptu", dajejo prednost večjemu ocenjevanju kakovosti predlogov projektov kot prvemu glavnemu merilu;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has changed its procedures regarding new calls for proposals for 2006, in that the new calls, which are based on "concept notes", appear to favour a greater quality assessment of project proposals as a first major criterion;
poziva Komisijo, da omogoči Parlamentu vsa poročila o oceni učinka, ki so bila izvedena v zvezi s projekti in so jih pripravili zunanji ali notranji ocenjevalci, da se zagotovi ustrezen pregled; poziva Komisijo, da postanejo presoje vplivov človekovih pravic sestavni in v celoti izvajan del vseh vodenj projektov Evropske unije, predhodno in naknadno, tako da vplivajo na prihodnje oblikovanje politike in programe ter tudi oceno programov, ki se zdaj izvajajo;
Asks the Commission to make available to Parliament all impact assessment reports regarding projects which are produced by external or internal evaluators, in order to ensure proper scrutiny; asks the Commission to make human rights impact assessments an integral and fully implemented part of all European Union project cycle management, both ex-ante and ex-post, thereby influencing both future policy-making and programmes, as well as the evaluation of ongoing programmes;
meni, da je nujno razviti vsebinsko vključevanje vprašanj v zvezi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic, demokratičnih načel, vladavine prava in dobrega upravljanja (kakor je izraženo v Sporazumu o partnerstvu AKP-EU) v dejavnosti, ki se financirajo iz Evropskega razvojnega sklada (ERS); poziva Komisijo, da letno pregleda vso s tem povezano porabo ERS za geografsko, regionalno in tematsko načrtovanje, da se poveča prepoznavnost dejavnosti EU na tem področju;
Considers it necessary to develop substantive mainstreaming of issues related to the respecting of human rights, democratic principles, the rule of law and good governance (as expressed in the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement) within actions financed from the European Development Fund (EDF); asks the Commission to produce an annual overview of all the related spending of the EDF across all geographic, regional and thematic programming, in order to increase the visibility of EU activities in this area;
poziva Komisijo, da pri načrtovanju politike razvojni cilji, kazalci in načrti temeljijo na dogovorjenih, splošnih mednarodnih instrumentih za človekove pravice, pri čemer v celoti vključuje organizacije za človekove pravice od zasnove politik in programov do izvajanja, spremljanja in ocenjevanja;
Asks the Commission in its policy programming to base development objectives, indicators and plans on agreed, universal international human rights instruments, fully involving human rights organisations from the conception of policies and programmes to the stages of implementation, monitoring and evaluation;
zahteva nadaljevanje seminarja iz junija 2005 o človekovih pravicah v zvezi z humanitarno pomočjo EU, vključno z namenjanjem sredstev EU sodnim zadevam zaradi pokolov in zločinov proti človečnosti;
Calls for follow-up to the June 2005 seminar on human rights in relation to EU humanitarian assistance, including by devoting EU resources to justice issues in the wake of massacres and crimes against humanity;
ponovno opozarja na navedeno resolucijo z dne 14. februarja 2006 v zvezi s prihodnjo politiko EU o uporabi klavzul o človekovih pravicah v vseh sporazumih EU, vključno z vzpostavitvijo učinkovitih mehanizmov za spremljanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic in večjim sodelovanjem Evropskega parlamenta v postopkih ocenjevanja ter posvetovanja v zvezi s temi klavzulami; pričakuje odgovor avstrijskega predsedstva skupaj s Komisijo na predloge Parlamenta;
Recalls its abovementioned resolution of 14 February 2006 regarding future EU policy on the application of human rights clauses in all EU agreements, including the setting-up of an effective mechanism for monitoring respect for human rights and the reinforced involvement of the European Parliament in the evaluation and consultation processes in respect of those clauses; is looking forward to the Austrian Presidency responding together with the Commission to Parliament's proposals;
ugotavlja, da sporazumi četrte generacije EU s tretjimi državami samodejno vključujejo politični dialog kot bistven element sporazuma, ki obravnava vprašanje človekovih pravic in demokracije; poudarja odločenost, da okrepi predhodni nadzor najnovejšega položaja v takšnih političnih dialogih;
Takes note of the fact that, as a matter of course, the EU's 4th-generation agreements with third countries include political dialogue as an essential element of the agreement incorporating human rights and democracy issues; emphasises its determination to strengthen ex-ante control of the newest position in such political dialogues;
se strinja s stališčem v poročilu za leto 2005, da je klavzula o človekovih pravicah osnova za pozitivno sodelovanje s tretjimi državami pri vprašanjih o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji; vseeno poudarja, da to ne izključuje možnosti začasne opustitve sodelovanja zaradi kršenja klavzule; ponovno poziva k uporabi drsne lestvice ukrepov in jasnega sistema sankcij v zvezi s kršitvami klavzule o človekovih pravicah s strani tretjih držav in poziva Svet, da razmisli o razširitvi glasovanja s kvalificirano večino na odločitev za sprejetje omejevalnih ukrepov ob primernem času v prihodnosti; ponovno poudarja zahtevo po boljšem mehanizmu spremljanja in posvetovanja klavzule ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, da vsako leto poročata Pododboru Evropskega parlamenta za človekove pravice o kršitvah klavzul o človekovih pravicah, vključno s klavzulami iz Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU;
Agrees with the position expressed in the 2005 Report that the human rights clause is a basis for positive engagement on human rights and democracy issues with third countries; emphasises, however, that this cannot exclude the possibility of the temporary suspension of cooperation on the grounds of a breach of the clause; reiterates its call for a sliding scale of measures and a clear system of sanctions to be used with respect to violations of the human rights clause by third countries, and calls on the Council to consider extending qualified majority voting to the decision to adopt restrictive measures at a future appropriate time; reiterates its demand for a better monitoring and consultation mechanism with respect to the clause, and calls on the Commission and the Council to report annually on breaches of human rights clauses, including those contained in the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, to the Human Rights Subcommittee of the European Parliament;
ponovno poudarja podporo sklepu Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2005, da naloži sankcije Uzbekistanu po dogodkih v Andižanu 13. maja 2005, ko so vladne varnostne sile ustrelile veliko število civilistov in ko so bili aretirani številni ljudje ter se jim je potem sodilo v postopku, ki ni izpolnjeval mednarodnih standardov pravičnega sojenja, da bi se prikrila resnica; navaja to kot primer za skladen ukrep EU proti vladi, ki jo zavezujejo obveze o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji v okviru Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju z EU; obžaluje, da je v primeru Uzbekistana sprejemanje sankcij trajalo kar šest mesecev; vseeno upa, da bo ta precedens okrepil klavzulo o človekovih pravicah v vseh sporazumih; poziva Svet, da odločno obsodi kršitev človekovih pravic v Turkmenistanu;
Reiterates its support for the Council's decision of 3 October 2005 to impose sanctions on Uzbekistan following the events in Andizhan on 13 May 2005, when a very substantial number of civilians were shot dead by government security forces and many people were arrested and afterwards put on trial in a process which did not meet international fair trial standards and sought to cover up the truth; takes this as an example of a coherent EU measure against a government which is bound by commitments on human rights and democracy under a Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with the EU; regrets that, in the case of Uzbekistan, the sanctions took six months to enact; hopes, however, that this precedent will have the effect of strengthening the human rights clause in all agreements; calls on the Council to roundly condemn the violation of human rights in Turkmenistan;
; izraža zadovoljstvo, ker so maroške oblasti izpustile politične zapornike, vendar opozarja na nadaljevanje kršenja človekovih pravic saharskega ljudstva; zahteva zaščito saharskega ljudstva in spoštovanje temeljnih človekovih pravic, predvsem svobodo govora, gibanja in javnega izražanja; ponovno zahteva, da se za Zahodno Saharo najde trajna in pravična rešitev spora, ki naj temelji na pravici do samoodločbe saharskega ljudstva, v skladu z ustreznimi resolucijami Varnostnega sveta, zlasti z resolucijo 1495;
; welcomes the release of Sahrawi political prisoners by the Moroccan authorities but condemns the continuation of human rights violations against the Sahrawi population; calls for the Sahrawi population to be protected and fundamental rights particularly freedom of expression, movement and demonstration to be respected; reiterates its call for a just and lasting solution to the conflict in Western Sahara, based on the right to self-determination of the Sahrawi people, in accordance with the relevant Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 1495(2003);
pozdravlja spremljanje in pregled smernic za izvajanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU Svet je smernice prvič sprejel decembra 2003.
Welcomes the monitoring and review of the Guidelines on Implementation and Evaluation of Restrictive Measures in the framework of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy The Council first approved these guidelines in December 2003.
Pregled je bil opravljen decembra 2005.
The review took place in December 2005.
pozdravlja vlogo, ki jo ima Skupna parlamentarna skupščina AKP-EU kot podlaga za odprto in pregledno razpravo o vprašanjih človekovih pravic, ter jo spodbuja, da nadaljuje delo in tako prispeva k političnemu dialogu, določenemu v členu 8 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU;
Welcomes the role which the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly plays as a platform for open and transparent discussion on human rights issues, and encourages it to continue its work, thus contributing to the political dialogue envisaged by Article 8 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement;
obžaluje, da se klavzula o človekovih pravicah iz člena 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU preredko uporablja glede na očitne kršitve človekovih pravic v državah AKP, in poziva k okrepitvi političnega dialoga v duhu Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU;
Regrets that the human rights clause contained in Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement is too rarely applied in the event of flagrant violations of human rights in the ACP countries, and urges that political dialogue in the spirit of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement be stepped up;
pozdravlja, kot zelo pozitiven primer, dejavnosti EU, kot so demarše in deklaracije po nasilni represiji v Etiopiji junija 2005; je zaskrbljen, ker EU ob pojavu podobnih kršitev človekovih pravic novembra 2005 ni dovolj sledila prejšnjemu zgledu; glede na veliko število opozicijskih voditeljev in zagovornikov človekovih pravic, ki so zdaj v zaporu in jim grozi smrtna kazen, meni, da vlada Etiopije ne izpolnjuje svojih obveznosti iz člena 8 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU, ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, da se odzoveta na zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta po usklajeni naravnanosti v skladu s členom 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU, kot je to Parlament zahteval v navedeni resoluciji z dne 15. decembra 2005;
Welcomes, as a very positive example, the EU activities in terms of demarches and declarations following violent repression in Ethiopia in June 2005; is concerned that when similar human rights violations occurred in November 2005, the EU appears not to have followed this up sufficiently; considering the high number of opposition leaders and human rights defenders currently in prison and facing the death penalty, believes that the government of Ethiopia is failing to meet its obligations under Article 8 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, and calls on the Commission and the Council to respond to the European Parliament's call for a coordinated stance in line with Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement as requested in its abovementioned resolution of 15 December 2005;
je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da Eritreja kljub hudim kršitvam človekovih pravic, vključno s samovoljnimi pripori in mučenjem tisočih pripornikov, ni omenjena v letnem poročilu Sveta o človekovih pravicah iz leta 2005; obžaluje, da sta Svet in Komisija kljub resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 18. novembra 2004 o položaju človekovih pravic v Eritreji UL C 201 E, 18.8.2005, str.
Expresses its concern at the fact that Eritrea, in spite of serious human rights violations, including arbitrary detentions and the torture of thousands of detainees, is not mentioned in the Council's Annual Report on human rights in 2005; regrets that, in spite of its resolution of 18 November 2004 on the human rights situation in Eritrea OJ C 201 E, 18.8.2005, p.
, v kateri je obsodil razmere na področju človekovih pravic v Eritreji ter pozval Svet in Komisijo, da začneta postopek posvetovanja v skladu s členom 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU, sprejela le malo ukrepov v zvezi s to zadevo; poziva Svet in Komisijo, da nemudoma začneta postopek posvetovanja v skladu s členom 96 Sporazuma o partnerstvu AKP-EU v zvezi z razmerami na področju človekovih pravic v Eritreji;
in which it condemned the human rights situation in Eritrea and called on the Council and the Commission to open the consultation procedure in accordance with Article 96 of the ACP-EU Partnership Agreement, little action has been taken by the Council and the Commission on this matter; calls on the Council and the Commission without delay to open the consultation procedure under Article 96 of the ACP-EU Agreement with regard to the human rights situation in Eritrea;