natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
biti ključni igralec pri zagotavljanju zmogljivosti in z uporabo mednarodnih standardov človekovih pravic kot merila državam pomagati zagotoviti učinkovito zaščito prosilcev za azil in beguncev,
to be a key player in ensuring capacity-building and to help countries provide effective protection for asylum-seekers and refugees, using international human rights standards as a benchmark,
obravnavati prošnje za zaščito na stopnji, ki je čim bližje potrebam in urediti varen dostop do EU s pomočjo urejenega in vodenega vstopa nekaterih oseb, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito,
to deal with applications for protection at a level as close as possible to needs and to regulate safe access to the EU by means of orderly and managed entry for some of the persons in need of international protection,
spoštovati načelo solidarnosti in zagotoviti pravično delitve odgovornosti,
to observe the principle of solidarity and to ensure the fair sharing of responsibility,
razviti celosten pristop, da bi na področju azila in vračanja vzpostavili hiter in učinkovit postopek odločanja;
to develop an integrated approach with a view to establishing, in the area of asylum and return, a prompt and efficient decision-making process;
poudarja potrebo po sodelovanju med tretjimi državami in EU za celovito in uravnoteženo azilno in migracijsko politiko EU; meni, da se sodelovanje s tretjimi državami lahko izvaja s pomočjo obstoječih instrumentov kot je evropska sosedska politika in z njo povezani bodoči akcijski načrti posameznih držav, oblikovani na prilagodljiv način in z ozirom na poseben položaj, kakor tudi z drugimi programi Skupnosti: pomoč osebam, ki so prisiljene zapustiti svoje domove v Aziji in Latinski Ameriki UL L 287, 31.10.2001, str.
Stresses the need for cooperation between third countries and the EU so as to ensure a comprehensive and balanced EU asylum and migration policy; considers that partnership with third countries can be implemented through existing instruments, such as the European Neighbourhood Policy and the forthcoming individual Country Action Plans relating thereto, designed in a flexible and situation-specific manner, as well as other Community programmes - the aid to uprooted people in Asia and Latin America OJ L 287, 31.10.2001, p.
, MEDA UL L 189, 30.7.1996, str.
, MEDA OJ L 189, 30.7.1996, p.
, CARDS UL L 306, 7.12.2000, str.
, CARDS OJ L 306, 7.12.2000, p.
, ERS UL L 83, 1.4.2003, str.
, EDF OJ L 83, 1.4.2003, p.
in program Aeneas UL L 80, 18.3.2004, str.
and Aeneas Programme OJ L 80, 18.3.2004, p.
v prepričanju, da je eden od instrumentov za zagotavljanje bolj urejenega in bolje vodenega vstopa oseb v EU, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, sistem za preseljevanje na ravni Skupnosti, temelječ na spoštovanju želja posameznikov in prostovoljnem sodelovanju vseh držav članic v sistemu, pri tem pa bi bile take osebe preseljene iz prve države gostiteljice v državo članico, kjer bi jim zagotovili zaščito, imele bi možnost integracije in samostojnosti, pri tem pa bi UNHCR sodeloval pri izbiri in posredovanju posebnih primerov; v ta namen poziva EU, naj oblikuje ustrezen pravni instrument, ki bi zagotavljal hitro uporabo takšnega sistema;
Is convinced that one of the instruments for guaranteeing more orderly and better managed entry into the EU of persons in need of international protection may consist in a Community-wide system of resettlement, based on respect for individual wishes and the voluntary participation of all the Member States in the system, whereby such persons would be transferred from a first host country to a Member State, where they would be guaranteed protection and would have prospects of integration and autonomy, with the UNHCR taking part in selecting and forwarding specific cases; to this end calls on the EU to draw up an appropriate legal instrument guaranteeing the prompt application of such a system;
zavrača "oddajo v zunanje izvajanje'postopka odločanja o prošnjah, pri katerem so prosilci za status begunca poslani v tretjo državo, saj to oteži ustrezno zastopanje prosilca in postopek oddalji od demokratičnega pregleda;
Rejects the "outsourcing" of the application process by sending applicants for refugee status to a third country, not least because it makes it more difficult for applicants to be properly represented and removes the process from democratic oversight;
meni, da mehanizem preselitve predstavlja način za omogočanje hitrega dostopa do zaščite, da ne bi begunci postali žrtve nezakonitega priseljevanja in omrežij trgovine z ljudmi ali da bi jim na priznanje statusa ne bilo treba čakati več let;
Considers that a resettlement mechanism constitutes the way to offer rapid access to protection without refugees falling victim to illegal immigration and human-trafficking networks or having to wait years before their status is recognised;
meni, da je program preselitve instrument, namenjen posebnim potrebam zaščite beguncev, katerih življenje, svoboda, zdravje in temeljne pravice so v državah, kamor so se zatekli, ogroženi;
Considers that the resettlement programme is an instrument aimed at responding to the specific protection needs of refugees whose lives, freedom, safety, health and fundamental rights are endangered in the countries where they have taken refuge;
meni, da centri za zadrževanje morebitnih migrantov v državi zadnjega prehoda ne sodijo niti v okvir iskanja trajnih rešitev v regijah izvora niti v okvir nudenja zatočišča osebam, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito; vsekakor verjame, da se za take centre sicer zdi, da nudijo kratkoročno rešitev za nekatere migracijske pritiske, vendar vzbujajo veliko dvomov o izpolnjevanju mednarodnih obveznosti glede človekovih pravic, nenazadnje zaradi poročil o zelo slabem spoštovanju človekovih pravic v režimih veliko prehodnih držav;
Considers that centres for the holding of would-be migrants in the country of final transit have no place in the consideration of durable solutions in the regions of origin, nor in offering sanctuary to those in need of international protection; indeed, believes that, while such centres may seem to provide a short-term solution to certain migration pressures, they raise many questions about the ability to meet international obligations in terms of human rights, not least on account of the very poor human rights records of the regimes of many of those transit countries;
verjame, da lahko taki programi preselitve, če so ustrezno vodeni in podprti z zadostnimi sredstvi, pripomorejo k razvoju javnega razumevanja beguncev in njihovih razlogov za iskanje zaščite v državah, ki te begunce sprejmejo, ter drugih, ki potrebujejo mednarodno zaščito, in k izboljševanju učinkovitosti EU v boju proti trgovini z ljudmi;
Trusts that such resettlement programmes, if properly managed and adequately resourced, and sensibly publicised by Member States and the EU, can assist in the development of a public understanding of refugees and their reasons for seeking protection in the countries receiving those refugees and of others in need of international protection and in enhancing the efficiency of the EU in combating human trafficking;
meni, da je aktiven razvoj takega razumevanja bistven v boju proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije, rasizma in ksenofobije znotraj EU;
Holds that the active development of such understanding is essential to combating all forms of discrimination, racism and xenophobia within the EU;
poziva EU, naj na jasen in dosleden način dokaže svojo pripravljenost pomagati tretjim državam v regijah izvora pri izboljšanju njihove zmogljivosti zaščite v skladu s pobudo UNHCR Konvencija plus in drugimi priporočili ter naj izključi možnost financiranja taborišč zadrževanja ali katerega koli drugega centra, ki omejuje osebno svobodo prosilcev za azil;
Calls on the EU to demonstrate in a visible and consistent way its readiness to assist third countries in the regions of origin to enhance their protection capacities in accordance with to the UNHCR Convention Plus initiative and other recommendations and to exclude the possibility of the financing of holding camps or any other centre limiting the personal freedom of asylum seekers;
meni, da morajo biti dodatna sredstva, potrebna za izboljšanje podpore v regijah izvora, dodeljena in usklajena iz obstoječih proračunskih postavk in ne iz ponovne dodelitve obstoječega proračuna za pomoč in razvoj; meni, da bi to bilo potrebno upoštevati pri posvetovanjih za finančni načrt; dodatno in usklajeno dodeljevanje sredstev organizaciji UNHCR bo prav tako potrebno, glede na vlogo, ki naj bi jo igral v tem procesu;
Considers that the additional resources required for the improvement of support in the regions of origin must be additional monies allocated and coordinated from existing budget lines and not a re-allocation of the existing aid and development budget; considers that this should be taken into account in deliberations on the Financial Perspective; considers that additional and coordinated funding for the UNHCR will also be necessary given the role it will be asked to play in this process;
poziva EU naj zagotovi potrebna proračunska sredstva (poleg tistih, ki so že namenjena za razvojno pomoč tretjim državam), ki bi bila na razpolago za izboljšanje finančne in institucionalne zmogljivosti zaščite beguncev v državah v razvoju, ki so pripravljene deliti odgovornost z EU na tem področju, pod pogojem, da se ta sredstva ne uporabijo za vzpostavitev taborišč zadrževanja ali katerega koli drugega centra, ki omejuje osebno svobodo prosilcev za azil;
Calls on the EU to ensure that the necessary budgetary means, other than those already envisaged as development aid to third countries, are made available to enhance the financial and institutional capacity, for protecting refugees, in developing countries on the condition that those means are not employed to establish holding camps or any other centre limiting the personal freedom of asylum seekers;
meni, da mora biti delitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti med vpletenimi agencijami jasna;
Considers it necessary for there to be clear lines of responsibility and accountability for the agencies involved;
meni, da je odločna skupna zunanja in varnostna politika, s katero se EU zaveže, da bo njena prednostna naloga reševanje dolgotrajnih sporov in njihovo preprečevanje, bistvenega pomena za pomoč osebam, ki iščejo zaščito; zato pozdravlja predlog Komisije za določitev programov EU za regionalno zaščito in prosi, da je vključen v njihov razvoj, potrebno ocenitev in spremljanje njihovega izvajanja;
Considers that a decisive common foreign and security policy committing the EU as a matter of priority to the resolution of long-term conflicts and to conflict prevention is essential in order to help those seeking protection; therefore welcomes the Commission's proposals to bring forward EU Regional Protection Programmes and asks to be involved in their development and in the necessary assessment and monitoring of their implementation;
meni, da morajo takšni programi zaščite vsebovati zagotovila proti prezgodnjemu vračanju beguncev na podlagi koncepta varne tretje države;
Considers that such Protection Programmes must contain safeguards against the premature return of refugees, based on the concept of the safe third country;
poziva Unijo, da, z namenom obravnavanja primerov, ko ljudje potrebujejo neposredno in nujno pomoč, raziščejo obstoječe težave v postopkih varovanega vstopa, v katerih so države članice prijavile zlorabo, ter da nadalje razišče možnost pravnega instrumenta, ki določa in vzpostavlja elemente sistema postopkov varovanega vstopa, del katerega bi bilo omogočanje državljanom tretjih držav, da oddajo prošnjo za azil ali drugo obliko mednarodne zaščite morebitni državi članici gostiteljici, vendar zunaj njenega ozemlja, in da lahko pridobijo začasno ali dokončno dovoljenje za vstop;
Calls on the Union, for the purposes of dealing with cases of people in need of immediate and urgent protection, to investigate existing problems with Protected Entry Procedures (PEPs) where abuse has been reported by Member States and to further explore the possibility of a legal instrument defining and establishing the elements of a PEP system, which would consist in allowing a third-country national to submit an application for asylum, or another form of international protection, to a potential host Member State, but from outside its territory, and to be able to obtain a provisional or definitive entry permit;
poudarja, da povečanje zmogljivosti zaščite v regijah izvora in oblikovanje postopkov varovanega vstopa vodi k zagotovitvi urejenega in predvidljivega načina vstopa v EU, hkrati pa naj se ohrani obstoječa pravica do prošnje za azil na podlagi spontanega prihoda v eno izmed držav članic EU;
Stresses that enhancing protection capacity in the regions of origin and creating the PEPs lead to ensuring an orderly and anticipated manner of entry into the EU, considers that the existing right of application for asylum upon spontaneous arrival in a Member State is to be maintained;
poudarja, da je za EU pomembno, da deli odgovornost s tretjimi državami, zlasti z državami prvega azila, na področju obravnavanja beguncev ter da je potrebno učinkovitejše sodelovanje za pospeševanje zmogljivosti zaščite v držah, ki sprejemajo begunce, zato da bi jim omogočili trajno izvajanje učinkovite zaščite;
Stresses that it is important for the EU to share responsibility with third countries, and in particular with the countries of first asylum, for the handling of refugees and that more effective cooperation is needed for the purposes of stepping up the protection capacity of the countries accommodating refugees, to enable them to become stable providers of real protection;
verjame, da bi morala biti Evropska unija bolje pripravljena na zagotavljanje nujne pomoči tistim državam, ki mejijo na države v krizi, da bi jim pomagali pri obvladovanju nenadnih in množičnih migracij, ki so posledica kriznih razmer, v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi;
Believes that the European Union should be better prepared to provide urgent assistance to the countries neighbouring states in crisis, in order to help them to address, in accordance with international standards, sudden and large-scale migrations resulting from crisis situations;
prizna vrednost podpore držav, ki sprejmejo večino iskalcev zatočišča, in meni, da morajo pogoji v teh zatočiščih ustrezati vsaj merilom, ki jih je Komisija opisala v točkah (a) in (e) odstavka 45 sporočila KOM(2004)0410 ;
Recognises the value of supporting those countries which receive the majority of those seeking sanctuary and considers it important that the conditions offered there meet at least those outlined by the Commission in points (a) to (e) of paragraph 45 of communication COM(2004)0410 ;
verjame, da taka podpora v regijah izvora prispeva k skupnemu azilnemu postopku v okviru EU, ki temelji na visokih standardih izvedbe, in je popolnoma skladna z našimi mednarodnimi obveznostmi, zato izjavlja, da taka podpora ne more nadomestiti tega postopka v okviru EU;
Considers such support in the regions of origin to be a complement to a common asylum procedure within the EU based upon high standards of delivery and in full recognition of our international obligations, and therefore states that such support cannot be a replacement for such a procedure within the EU;
meni, da bo vlaganje truda v trajne rešitve zahtevalo precej usklajevanja med različnimi oddelki in agencijami Komisije, še posebej oddelkov za razvoj, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, trgovino in zunanje odnose; verjame, da mora Komisija svoje predloge za tako sodelovanje karseda hitro sporočiti Parlamentu in mu redno poročati o napredovanju sodelovanja;
Considers that investing in durable solutions will require considerable coordination between different departments and agencies of the Commission, and especially those concerned with development, justice and home affairs, trade and external relations; believes that the Commission should communicate its proposals for such cooperation to the Parliament as soon as possible and report regularly to Parliament on the progress of such cooperation;
pozdravlja predložitev sporočila Komisije KOM(2004)0503 , katerega namen je razviti proces, ki bi odpravil vrzel na področju zaščite in pripeljati do učinkovite izvedbe prve faze skupne azilne politike;
Welcomes the Commission's submission of its communication COM(2004)0503 , the purpose of which is to develop the process which would close the protection gap and lead to the effective implementation of the first stage of the common asylum policy;
pozdravlja predlog izboljšanja postopka ocenitve z zbiranjem vseh ustreznih podatkov vnaprej, a poudarja, da morajo biti vključeni popolni podatki o državi, pridobljeni iz različnih virov, kakovostno usposabljanje oseb, ki odločajo o prošnjah, polno pravno zastopanje prosilcev, podatki v prosilcu razumljivem jeziku in pravica do vložitve pritožbe v državi;
Welcomes the proposal to 'front-load' the assessment procedure to include all relevant information but stresses that this must include the application of full-country information from a variety of sources, high-quality training for those deciding on applications and the full legal representation of applicants, information provided in a language comprehensible to the applicant and the right to in-country appeal;
v pomoč kakovostnemu sprejemanju odločitev na področju azila v prihodnosti predlaga, da morajo biti vzpostavljeni sistemi za spremljanje posledic za osebe, ki so vrnjene v državo izvora, potem ko je bila njihova pritožba označena kot neutemeljena, da bi lahko ocenili, ali so bile sprejete pravilne odločitve;
To improve the quality of asylum decision-making in the future, proposes that systems be put in place to monitor the outcome for those returned to their country of origin when their claim has been deemed unfounded, in order to assess whether correct decisions have been made;
poudarja potrebo po usklajenih pristopih, splošnih akcijskih načrtih in posebnih sporazumih, ki bi oblikovali in zagotavljali učinkovit odziv za zaščito beguncev in/ali dosegali trajne rešitve v državah izvora, strategije, ki bi vzela v obzir najboljše prakse vodenja upravnih aktov in dovoljevale izmenjavo podatkov o državah izvora in poreklu;
Stresses the need to devise harmonised approaches, general action plans and special agreements capable of formulating and guaranteeing effective responses for the protection of refugees and/or achieving lasting solutions in the countries of origin, strategies which take account of best practices in the management of administrative acts and allow the exchange of information on the countries of origin and provenance;
podpira predlog enotnega postopka za mednarodno zaščito, ker je prepričan, da se z enotnim postopkom, ki ga vodi en sam pristojni organ, prihrani gospodarske vire, predvsem pa omogoči hitrejši in učinkovitejši potek postopka ter omogoči večja zagotovila osebam, ki iščejo zaščito, saj bi en sam organ namreč ocenil potrebe prosilca po mednarodni zaščiti bodisi z namenom dodelitve statusa begunca bodisi pomožne zaščite ali pa bi, če je to primerno, zavrnil njegovo prošnjo;
Backs the proposal for a single procedure for international protection, since it is convinced that a single procedure administered by a single competent authority will save economic resources, but above all will make the procedure swifter and more efficient and provide better guarantees for persons seeking protection, since the single authority would assess the international protection needs of the applicant, either in order to grant him refugee status or subsidiary protection or, if appropriate, turn down his application;
prav tako zahteva, da EU vzpostavi pospešen postopek za odobritev azila, ki ne bi trajal več kot 6 mesecev, ki bi olajšal obravnavanje neupravičenih prošenj in tako omogočil hitrejšo in učinkovitejšo obravnavo tistih prošenj, ki dejansko izpolnjujejo zahteve za odobritev azila;
Also requests that the EU should have an accelerated procedure for granting asylum, taking not more than 6 months, which would make it easier to deal with unjustified applications and thus streamline formalities for those which actually meet the requirements for the granting of asylum;
zahteva, da se v primerih zavrnitve katerega koli statusa mednarodne zaščite zaradi neizpolnjevanja pogojev negativno odločitev primerno utemelji in se pisno sporoči v overjenem dokumentu v prosilcu razumljivem jeziku;
Requests that, in cases where any of the types of status of international protection should be refused because the requirements are not met, the unfavourable decision should be duly reasoned and communicated in writing in an authenticated document in a language comprehensible to the applicant;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, da popolnoma spremenita politiko vračanja in ponovnega sprejemanja, ki odpira pot za evropske čarterske polete, namenjene vračanju priseljencev v države izvora;
Urges the Commission and the Council to reverse the return and readmission policy which paves the way for European charter flights to send back immigrants to countries of origin;
je prepričan, da enotni postopek ne bo negativno vplival na status beguncev, predviden v Ženevski konvenciji iz leta 1951, če vlogo obravnava isti organ po predhodno določenem postopku: zahteva bi bila najprej obravnavana na podlagi razlogov za zaščito, določenih v Ženevski konvenciji, in v primeru, da se ti ne morejo uporabiti, bi bilo odločeno, ali se uporabijo razlogi, ki opravičujejo dodelitev pomožne zaščite;
Is convinced that a single procedure would not adversely affect the status of refugees as envisaged in the Geneva Convention of 1951, if the application is examined by the same authority in a set order: the request would be examined on the basis of the reasons for protection laid down in the Geneva Convention, and if these were not applicable, it would be determined whether the reasons justifying the granting of subsidiary protection apply;
izraža globoko zaskrbljenost glede resnega položaja, ki bo neizogibno nastal v prihodnosti, če bodo morale države članice na eni strani izvajati Direktivo 2004/83/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004, o vzpostavitvi minimalnih pogojev za priznanje statusa begunca državljanom tretjih držav, osebam brez državljanstva ali osebam, ki potrebujejo drugačno obliko mednarodne zaščite, in vsebini dodeljene pomoči UL L 304, 30.9.2004, str.
Expresses its deep concern at the serious situation which will inevitably arise in future if, on the one hand, Member States have to apply Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted OJ L 304, 30.9.2004, p.
, katere področje uporabe pokriva dva tipa mednarodne zaščite (zaščita za begunce in pomožna zaščita), medtem ko je področje uporabe bodoče direktive o minimalnih standardih za postopek dodelitve in odvzema statusa begunca v državah članicah na drugi strani omejeno na obravnavo prošenj za mednarodno zaščito, ki temeljijo na razlogih, navedenih v Ženevski konvenciji iz leta 1951 in njenem Protokolu iz leta 1967, saj so prošnje za pomožno zaščito izven njenega področja uporabe;
, the scope of which covers the two types of international protection (refugees and subsidiary protection), whilst, on the other hand, the scope of the future directive on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status is confined to the examination of applications for international protection based on the reasons listed in the Geneva Convention of 1951 and the Protocol of 1967, since applications for subsidiary protection are outside its scope;