natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
; meni, da bi bilo treba v skladu s členom 75 PDEU določiti pravni okvir za ukrepe v zvezi s pretokom kapitala in plačili, kot so zamrznitev sredstev, finančnega premoženja ali ekonomskih dobičkov, ki pripadajo ali so v posesti ali imetništvu fizičnih ali pravnih oseb, skupin ali nedržavnih subjektov, vključno z ukrepi, usmerjenimi proti nekaterim osebam in subjektom, ki so povezani z Osamo bin Ladnom, mrežo Al Kajda in talibani, kot je poudaril tudi Odbor za pravne zadeve; takšen pristop bi omogočal ustrezno raven demokratične odgovornosti, in sicer s posredovanjem Parlamenta prek postopka soodločanja (običajni zakonodajni postopek); upoštevati bi bilo treba tudi ustrezno udeležbo nacionalnih parlamentov;
; considers that a legal framework should be established under Article 75 TFEU for measures with regard to capital movements and payments, such as the freezing of funds, financial assets or economic gains belonging to, or owned or held by, natural or legal persons, groups or non-State entities, including (as pointed out also by its Committee on Legal Affairs) for restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban; such an approach would allow a proper level of democratic accountability through the intervention of Parliament by means of the codecision procedure (ordinary legislative procedure); due account should also be taken of the proper involvement of national parliaments;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri prihodnjih ukrepih, sprejetih v skladu s členom 215(2) PDEU, kot na primer pri omejevalnih ukrepih proti Zimbabveju in nekaterih posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih, uperjenih proti fizičnim in pravnim osebam, subjektom in organom, povezanim z razmerami v Somaliji, upoštevati možnost neobveznega posvetovanja s Parlamentom (v skladu s slovesno izjavo o Evropski uniji, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel v Stuttgartu 19. junija 1983 in ki predvideva neobvezno posvetovanje s parlamentom v mednarodnih zadevah, četudi pogodbe tega ne določajo); takšen pristop bi bil v skladu z duhom Lizbonske pogodbe in v skladu s prejšnjo (posvetovalno) vlogo Parlamenta na tem področju;
Considers that with regard to future measures – such as restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe and certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain natural and legal persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Somalia, taken under Article 215(2) TFEU – the possibility of an optional consultation of Parliament should be taken into account (in accordance with the European Council "Solemn Declaration on European Union", made at Stuttgart on 19 June 1983, providing for the optional consultation of Parliament on international matters even where the Treaties were silent); such an approach could be considered in keeping with the spirit of the Treaty of Lisbon and in line with Parliament's previous (consultative) role in this area;
znova izraža zahtevo, da se na letni ravni temeljito oceni izvajanje določb o omejevalnih ukrepih in njihovo učinkovitost ter da se hkrati ustrezno in pravočasno obvešča Parlament o teh vprašanjih; meni, da morajo v ta namen sankcije vedno spremljati jasna merila uspešnosti;
Reiterates its request for a thorough evaluation of the implementation, on an annual basis, of the provisions prescribing restrictive measures and of their effectiveness, together with proper and timely transmission of information to Parliament in such matters; considers that, to this end, sanctions should always be accompanied by clear benchmarks;
poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje mrežo neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki bo zadolžena za predložitev predlogov Svetu o najbolj primernih omejevalnih ukrepih v določenih razmerah, za redno poročanje o spremembah razmer glede na referenčna merila in zastavljene cilje ter po potrebi za svetovanje glede bolj učinkovitega izvajanja sankcij; meni, da bi oblikovanje take mreže prineslo več preglednosti, izboljšalo splošno raven razprave o sankcijah in okrepilo izvajanje in redno spremljanje sankcij v posebnih primerih;
Calls on the Commission to establish a network of independent experts tasked with proposing to the Council the most pertinent restrictive measures in a given situation, reporting regularly on changes in the situation in the light of the reference criteria and the aims being pursued and, where appropriate, suggesting how to implement sanctions more effectively; considers that the establishment of such a network would make for greater transparency, improve the quality of debate about sanctions generally and strengthen the application and continuous monitoring of sanctions in specific cases;
poudarja, da dejavnosti nevladnih organizacij veliko prispevajo k razvoju, demokraciji in človekovim pravicam ter da bi posvetovanje z njimi o politikah EU za boj proti terorizmu koristilo pri pridobivanju dragocenih informacij o razmerah na terenu; poleg tega poudarja, da jih represivni protiteroristični ukrepi, ne bi smeli ovirati pri uresničevanju ciljev na področju razvoja, demokracije in človekovih pravic;
Points out that the activities of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) contribute substantially to development, democracy and human rights and that it could be useful to consult them on EU counter-terrorism policies in order to obtain valuable information on the situation in the field; further points out that repressive counter-terrorism measures, should not be an obstacle to their objectives in the areas of development, democracy and human rights;
poudarja, da se pripombe, ki sledijo, med drugim nanašajo na vsebino predlogov, ki jih je predložila Komisija v skladu s prejšnjim pravnim okvirom in so postali z novim pravnim okvirom iz Lizbonske pogodbe zastareli; poudarja, da je sklicevanje na Sklep Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
Emphasises that the following comments refer, inter alia, to the substance of the proposals put forward by the Commission under the former legal framework, which are now obsolete, having also in view the legal framework established by the Treaty of Lisbon; points out that any reference to Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
poudarja, da so bili zamrznitev sredstev in finančnih virov nekaterih oseb, skupin in subjektov ocenjeni kot ustrezno orodje za izpolnitev zaveze o boju proti terorizmu ob hkratnem spoštovanju človekovih pravic; poudarja, da morajo te ukrepe ves čas spremljati močna in ustrezna varovala ter poroštva, pri čemer je treba upoštevati izredno resne posledice, ki jih ima oblikovanje črnih seznamov za posameznike in organizacije; izpostavlja, da se v zvezi z omejevalnimi ukrepi, uperjenimi proti nekaterim osebam in subjektom, povezanim z Osamo bin Ladnom, mrežo Al Kajda in talibani, uporablja člen 75 PDEU;
Points out that, in order to fulfil its commitment to combating terrorism while respecting human rights, it has considered the freezing of the funds and economic resources of certain persons, groups and entities an appropriate instrument to that end; emphasises that the implementation of such measures must be accompanied at all times by strong and adequate safeguards and guarantees, taking into account the extremely severe consequences of 'blacklisting' for the individuals or organisations concerned; points out that, in relation to restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban, Article 75 TFEU applies;
poudarja, da je treba temeljito premisliti o pomembnih posledicah, ki bi jih imele protiteroristične sankcije za kazensko pravo, ter da je treba na nacionalni ravni sprejeti ustrezna varovalna sredstva v zvezi z oblikovanjem črnih seznamov;
Points to the need for in-depth reflection on the significant criminal law effects of anti-terrorist sanctions and for the adoption at national level of adequate remedies in respect of such blacklisting;
poudarja, da so bili postopki oblikovanja seznamov in umika z njih v sklopu sankcij, ki sta jih uvedla Evropska unija in Združeni narodi, deležni ostrih kritik, saj niso zagotavljali ustrezne zaščite temeljnih pravic (tako postopkovnih kot dejanskih) ter pravne varnosti; zato pozdravlja nedavne pobude na ravni EU za opravo omenjenih pomanjkljivosti; vendar pa obžaluje, da je Svet pokazal omejeno zanimanje za to, da bi zagotovil, da bi revidirana Uredba (ES) št. 881/2002 spoštovala temeljne pravice zadevnih oseb in subjektov;
Recalls that listing and de-listing procedures for the UN and EU sanctions regimes have been strongly criticised as failing to provide satisfactory protection for fundamental rights (both procedural and substantive) and legal certainty; welcomes, therefore, the recent initiatives taken at EU level to remedy the above-mentioned shortcomings; regrets, however, that the Council in particular has shown limited ambition with regard to ensuring that the revised Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 respects the fundamental rights of the persons and entities concerned;
se v zvezi z obrazložitvijo, ki mora biti predložena, sprašuje, ali predlog Komisije in besedilo Sveta ustrezata zahtevam iz sodbe v prej omenjeni zadevi
Queries, in relation to the "statement of reasons" to be provided, whether either the Commission proposal or the Council text complies with the requirements of the judgment in the above-mentioned Case
, v kateri se Sodišče sklicuje na obvezno navedbo razlogov, zaradi katerih je bilo ime posameznika ali subjekta vključeno na seznam, in še posebej poudarja pravico posameznikov in subjektov, da so seznanjeni z dokazi, zbranimi proti njim;
, which referred to the obligation to communicate the grounds on which, in such cases, the name of a person or entity is included in the list, taking into particular account the right of persons and entities concerned to be informed of the evidence against them;
poudarja, da dokazi v nekaterih primerih temeljijo predvsem na podatkih, ki so jih posredovale obveščevalne službe, ki morda delujejo v skladu s posebnimi nacionalnimi predpisi; ponavlja svoje stališče iz leta 2008, da izvršni privilegij ne bi smel preprečevati polnega uveljavljanja pravice do pravičnega sojenja ali voditi v nekaznovanje v primerih kršitev mednarodne zakonodaje; v zvezi s tem poziva nacionalne parlamente, naj izvajajo popolni nadzor nad dejavnostmi vlade ter skrbijo za dosledno in pravočasno izvajanje evropskega pravnega okvira, temelječega na členu 15 PDEU; poudarja, da je treba Parlament vključiti v delo konference odborov za nadzor obveščevalnih služb držav članic, ki je že bila vzpostavljena;
Emphasises that evidence in some cases is based primarily on information provided by intelligence services, which may be operating under specific national rules; reiterates its 2008 position that executive privilege should not prevent the full exercise of the right to a judge or lead to impunity in the case of breaches of international law; calls, in this regard, on national parliaments to exercise full oversight over their governments' activities and urges the full and swift implementation of a European legal framework founded on Article 15 TFEU; reaffirms the need to associate Parliament with the work of the already established Conference of Oversight Committees of the Intelligence Bodies of the Member States;
poziva k temeljiti in hitri izvedbi ocene o učinkovitosti protiterorističnih sankcij, ki sta jih uvedla Evropska unija in Združeni narodi; nadalje z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da naj bi imele protiteroristične sankcije pri reševanju sporov in pri razvojnih prizadevanjih v številnih regijah nasprotni učinek od zaželenega, zato poziva, da se pri ocenjevanju sankcij ta faktor upošteva;
Calls for a full and timely assessment of the effectiveness of the EU and UN "terrorist" sanctions regimes; furthermore, notes with concern that "terrorist" sanctions appear to have had an adverse effect on conflict resolution and development efforts in numerous regions and urges that this factor be taken into account when evaluating the regimes;
meni, da bi bilo nujno treba izboljšati postopke Združenih narodov pri oblikovanju seznamov in umiku z njih ter da bi si morale države članice prizadevati tudi za izboljšanje internih postopkov za izvajanje usmerjenih sankcij, kot je bilo omenjeno v prej omenjenemu poročilu in dopolnilu Odbora za pravne zadeve in človekove pravice pri parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope;
Considers that improvements in UN listing and de-listing practices should be pursued as a matter of urgency and that Member States should also work towards improving their internal targeted sanctioning (implementation) procedures, as suggested in the above-mentioned report and addendum by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe;
meni, da je treba pozdraviti namero iz skupnega stališča Sveta 2008/632/SZVP in kasnejši predlog (predlog uredbe), ki razširjata omejevalne ukrepe tudi na tiste posameznike in subjekte, odgovorne za kršitve človekovih pravic, ki niso del oblasti, prav tako pa pozdravlja uskladitev zakonodaje z nedavnimi sodbami Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti o temeljni pravici posameznikov in subjektov, proti katerim so sprejeti omejevalni ukrepi, do ustreznega sodnega postopka;
Considers that the intention of the Council's Common Position 2008/632/CFSP and of the subsequent proposal (draft regulation) – extending the restrictive measures to individuals and entities responsible for human rights violations in Zimbabwe beyond the government – is to be welcomed, as is the alignment of legislation with recent decisions of the Court of Justice regarding the fundamental right to due process enjoyed by individuals and entities who are targeted by restrictive measures;
meni, da je treba opraviti natančen nadzor, da bi lahko ocenili, ali razlogi, zaradi katerih so bili sprejeti omejevalni ukrepi, še obstajajo, ter našli način, kako te ukrepe združiti z verodostojnimi pobudami za spodbujanje demokracije in človekovih pravic v Zimbabveju;
Is of the opinion that careful monitoring must be conducted in order to assess whether the grounds on which the restrictive measures were adopted persist, and to explore how restrictive measures can be combined with credible incentives to promote democracy and human rights in Zimbabwe;
pozdravlja in podpira določbe, ki bi zagotovile, da bo Evropska unija izpolnila svoje mednarodne zaveze o takojšnjem izvajanju usmerjenih sankcij, ki so jih Združeni narodi sprejeli proti posameznikom in subjektom, za katere je ugotovljeno, da sodelujejo pri dejanjih, ki ogrožajo mir, varnost ali stabilnost Somalije ali jih podpirajo, da so kršili embargo na orožje ali da so ovirali dostavo humanitarne pomoči;
Welcomes and supports provisions to ensure that the EU complies with its international commitments to implement immediately targeted sanctions adopted by the UN against individuals and entities found to have been engaging in or providing support for acts that threaten the peace, security or stability of Somalia, having acted in violation of the arms embargo or having obstructed the delivery of humanitarian assistance;
se v luči omenjenega primera
Queries, however, as highlighted above, the adequacy of the texts proposed by the Commission concerning information to be provided to listed persons – about the grounds on which names of persons or entities are included in a list and about their legal rights – in the light of the above-mentioned Case
Kadi in Al Barakaat International Foundation proti Svetu in Komisiji
Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation
poudarja, kot je izpostavil Odbor za pravne zadeve, da se za zadevne ukrepe uporablja člen 215 PDEU, vendar je treba pred tem izpolniti vrsto pogojev: ukrepi morajo na primer temeljiti na predlogu podpredsednika Komisije/visokega predstavnika Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko, Komisija pa mora vanje vključiti določbe, potrebne za pravna varovala;
Points out that, as underlined by its Committee on Legal Affairs, Article 215 TFEU would apply to the measures in question, but that a series of conditions should be fulfilled: measures must, for example, be based on a proposal from the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Commission must include the necessary provisions for legal safeguards;
meni, da bi bilo treba za sprejetje izvedbenih ukrepov, ko se člen 215 PDEU uporablja kot pravna podlaga za bodoče predloge, upoštevati člen 291 PDEU;
Takes the view that Article 291 TFEU should be taken into account in order to adopt implementing measures when Article 215 TFEU is used as the legal basis for future proposals;
O vidikih varstva podatkov
On data protection aspects
ugotavlja, da mora biti morebitno pošiljanje podatkov tretjim državam in mednarodnim organizacijam v skladu s členom 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001, da se zagotovi ustrezno varstvo teh podatkov; v predlog bo morda treba vključiti določbe v zvezi s tem, morda pa bodo potrebni tudi posebni dogovori z Združenimi narodi; ugotavlja, da v predlogu ni obravnavana odgovornost v primeru nezakonite obdelave in objave osebnih podatkov;
Observes that possible transfers of data to third countries and international organisations should comply with Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, with a view to ensuring adequate protection of the data in question; the proposal may need to include stipulations in this regard and arrangements with the UN may also be necessary; notes that the proposal does not affect the liability which may arise in the event of unlawful processing and publication of personal data;
poudarja dejstvo, da bi moralo biti obveščanje zadevnih oseb in subjektov, h kateremu je pozvalo Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, karseda obsežno ter da bi bilo treba pojasniti podatke o fizičnih osebah s seznamov, navedene v prilogah Besedilo bi na primer lahko vključevalo določbo: "Priloga [...] vsebuje le podatke, potrebne za namene preverjanja identitete fizičnih oseb s seznama in v vsakem primeru le informacij iz točk od a) do [...]".
Underlines the fact that notification of the persons and entities concerned, as called for by the Court of Justice, should be as comprehensive as possible and that the information provided on listed natural persons in given annexes should be clarified Texts could, for example, include a stipulation that "Annex [...] shall include only the information necessary for the purpose of verification of the identity of the listed natural persons and in any case no more than the information provided in points a) to [...]".
Can the Lisbon Treaty be expected to help?
Can the Lisbon Treaty be expected to help?",
meni, da je treba čimprej sprejeti splošni okvir o varstvu podatkov iz člena 16 PDEU ter da je treba sprejeti tudi posebne določbe, ki jih predpisuje člen 39 PEU;
Considers it to be of the utmost importance that a general framework on data protection, as provided for in Article 16 TFEU, is adopted as soon as possible and that specific provisions as required by Article 39 TEU are also adopted;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter generalnima sekretarjema Združenih narodov in Sveta Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the Council of Europe.
ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Odbora za ustavne zadeve z dne 2. decembra 2009,
having regard to the letter of 2 December 2009 from the chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,
ob upoštevanju člena 211 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,
sklene, da se členoma 27(1) in 28(1) doda sledeča razlaga:
Decides to append the following interpretation to Rules 27(1) and 28(1):
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 17. decembra 2009 o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti v skladu s točko 27 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju ( KOM(2009)0660 – C7-0303/2009 – 2009/2207(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2009 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument in accordance with point 27 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management ( COM(2009)0660 – C7-0303/2009 – 2009/2207(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0660 – C7-0303/2009 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0660 – C7-0303/2009 ),
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobre proračunskem poslovodenju UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.
, zlasti točke 27 tega sporazuma,
the IIA, and in particular point 27 thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje prve obravnave predloga splošnega proračuna za leto 2010 dne 22. oktobra 2009 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0051 in P7_TA(2009)0052 .
having regard to its first reading of 22 October 2009 of the 2010 draft general budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0051 and P7_TA(2009)0052 .
ob upoštevanju izjave o financiranju Evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, ki so jo dne 2. aprila 2009 sprejele tri institucije,
having regard to the declaration adopted by the three institutions on 2 April 2009 on the financing of the European Economic Recovery Plan,
ob upoštevanju izida usklajevalnega sestanka z dne 18. novembra 2009,
having regard to the results of the conciliation meeting of 18 November 2009,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0080/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0080/2009 ),
ker institucije EU menijo, da je treba nujno financirati drugo fazo Evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva,
whereas the EU institutions consider it imperative to finance the second phase of the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP),
ker se je Bolgarija med pristopnimi pogajanji zavezala, da bo zaprla jedrsko elektrarno Kozloduj s pomočjo finančne podpore Skupnosti v obdobju 2007–2009,
whereas during its accession negotiations, Bulgaria committed itself to the closure of the Kozloduy nuclear power plant with the help of financial support from the Community in 2007-2009,
ker se bo razgradnja jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj nadaljevala tudi po letu 2009 in bo zahtevala financiranje v višini 300 000 000 EUR za obdobje 2010–2013,
whereas the decommissioning of the Kozloduy power plant will continue after 2009 and require financing of EUR 300 000 000 for the period 2010-2013,
ker sta obe veji proračunskega organa na usklajevalnem sestanku dne 18. novembra 2009 sklenili, da uporabita instrument prilagodljivosti za:
whereas the two arms of the budgetary authority decided at the conciliation meeting of 18 November 2009 to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to:
dopolnitev financiranja Evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva v znesku 120 000 000 EUR v proračunu za leto 2010;
complement the financing of the EERP for an amount of EUR 120 000 000 in the 2010 budget;
financiranje razgradnje jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj v znesku 75 000 000 EUR v letu 2010;
finance the decommissioning of the Kozloduy power plant for an amount of EUR 75 000 000 in 2010,