natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je zlasti v fazi industrijskih sprememb treba najti ravnotežje med pravili konkurence, ki jih morajo podjetja spoštovati na stalno spreminjajočem se trgu, ter pravico zaposlenih do obveščenosti in posvetovanja, ki se lahko doseže zlasti s pogajanji o kolektivnih pogodbah z vodstvom podjetij,
having regard, particularly in phases of industrial change, to an equilibrium between the rules of competition, with which businesses must comply in a constantly changing market, and the right of employees to information and communication, which can be achieved by, inter alia, negotiating collective agreements with management,
ker je v državah članicah, v katerih imajo podjetja sedež, nujno potrebno razvijanje kulture partnerstva med delodajalci in zaposlenimi, tako da se tudi vnaša duh sodelovanja, ki ga direktiva zahteva pri odnosu z lokalnimi zastopniki delavcev,
whereas in all the Member States in which businesses are established there is an urgent need to develop a culture of partnership between employers and employees, so that the spirit of cooperation demanded by the directive is also applied in relation to local workers’ delegates,
ker sta tvorna in jasna delitev informacij ter pravo posvetovanje zaposlenih pomembna za uspeh podjetij in socialno kohezijo in ker sta poleg tega obveščanje in posvetovanje pomemben sestavni del evropskega socialnega modela,
whereas constructive and positive sharing of information and genuine consultation of employees is important for both the success of companies and social cohesion; whereas, furthermore, information and consultation are an important component of our European social model,
ker možnost pravne negotovosti zaposlenih v primeru sprememb lastništva vzbuja očitno skrb,
whereas the possibility of legal insecurity of employees in the event of changes in ownership is a matter of obvious concern,
ker so posamezni primeri preoblikovanja in kolektivnega odpuščanja poudarili možne težave evropske zakonodaje o pravici delavcev do obveščenosti in posvetovanja z njimi, zlasti glede rokov in možnih kazni v primeru neizpolnjevanja ali neskladnosti z zakonskimi zahtevami glede rokov objave informacij v posameznih državah članicah,
whereas various cases of restructuring and collective redundancy have highlighted possible problems in European legislation on workers’ right to information and consultation, particularly with regard to timeliness and possible sanctions in the event of non-compliance, as well as conforming with the legal requirements within different Member States governing the timing of information release,
poudarja, da morajo družbeni odnosi, ki temeljijo na dialogu, pravem informiranju in posvetovanju zaposlenih in njihovih predstavnikov, koristiti kolektivnim pogajanjem in zmanjševati tveganje spora ter spodbujati uspešnost podjetij;
Emphasises that social relations based on dialogue and genuine information and consultation of employees and their representatives should benefit collective negotiations and reduce the risk of conflict, and may also prove to be a factor in the success of businesses;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadzira uporabo Direktive 94/95 in poziva države članice, naj pravno ukrepajo proti podjetjem, ki te direktive še niso prenesla;
Calls on the Commission to supervise the application of Directive 94/95; calls on Member States to take legal action against businesses which have not implemented this directive;
predlaga, naj Komisija učinkoviteje spremlja prenos zadevne direktive v državah članicah;
Suggests that the Commission monitor more effectively the transposition of the directive in question in the Member States;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije, naj bo ustrezen odziv v okrepitvi izmenjave najboljše prakse med socialnimi partnerji;
Welcomes the Commission’s suggestion that the appropriate response may be a reinforcement of exchange of best practice between the social partners;
opozarja, da izvirna direktiva poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog revizije Direktive 94/45/ES ter predlaga, naj socialni partnerji upoštevajo naslednje:
Recognises that the original directive calls upon the Commission to submit a proposal for the revision of Directive 94/45/EC, and suggests that the social partners might usefully consider the following:
(i) vključitev natančnejše opredelitve obveščanja in posvetovanja z zaposlenimi, kot izvajanja odprte izmenjave mnenj in dialoga med zaposlenimi ali njihovimi predstavniki ter delodajalcem,
(i) inclusion of a more precise definition of information and consultation of employees as the implementation of an open exchange of views and dialogue between employees or their representatives and the employer,
(ii) večji prag za podjetja in prožnejši pristop, ob upoštevanju, da zahteva enakih meril za vse verjetno ni primerna v različnih okoliščinah, s katerimi se soočajo različna podjetja v različnem času,
(ii) an increase in the thresholds for companies and the introduction of a greater flexibility of approach, noting that a one-size-fits-all requirement is unlikely to be appropriate in the differing circumstances facing different companies at different times;
(iii) večjo prožnost, ki bo omogočala prilagodljivost številnih članov evropskih svetov delavcev in njihovih posebnih pogajalskih organov po večjem preoblikovanju podjetij,
(iii) greater flexibility, allowing for adjustments in numbers of members of the European works council and the special negotiating body following major restructuring of the company;
(iv) priporočilo, naj zaposleni svobodno izbirajo svoje predstavnike v svetih delavcev;
(iv) a recommendation that representatives of employees on works councils should be freely chosen by employees;
priznava, da sta boljša oskrba z informacijami ter pravica zaposlenih, da se z njimi posvetuje, priložnost za vzpostavitev socialno združljivega procesa preoblikovanja industrije za ohranjanje socialnega miru;
Recognises better delivery of information and employees’ right to be consulted as a good opportunity to establish socially compatible restructuring processes in industry, in order to maintain social peace;
pozdravlja prostovoljne pobude, ki so jih dala nekatera podjetja za vzpostavitev svetov delavcev po vsem svetu in gleda na to kot na pozitiven korak, ki ga morajo posnemati druge organizacije;
Welcomes the voluntary initiatives taken in certain companies to set up worldwide works councils and regards this as a positive step to be copied by other organisations;
PREDLOG SKLEPA
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION
v skladu s členom 176(10) Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 176(10) of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlagaDiana Wallis
by Diana Wallis
v imenu Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society"
on behalf of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society
o poročilu Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society"
on the report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society
Sklep o poročilu Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society"
on the report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (2006/2199(INI))
ob upoštevanju člena 193 Pogodbe o ES,
having regard to Article 193 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa 95/167/ES, Euratom, ESPJ Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 19. aprila 1995 o določbah, ki podrobno urejajo uresničevanje pravice Evropskega parlamenta do preiskave UL L 113, 19.5.1995, str.
having regard to Decision 95/167/EC, Euratom, ECSC of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 19 April 1995 on the detailed provisions governing the exercise of the European Parliament's right of inquiry OJ L 113, 19.5.1995, p.
ob upoštevanju Sklepa 2006/469/ES o ustanovitvi Preiskovalnega odbora za krizo družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society" UL L 186, 7.7.2006, str.
having regard to its Decision 2006/469/EC of 18 January 2006 on setting up a Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable life Assurance Society OJ L 186, 7.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. julija 2006 o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2006)0293 . ",
having regard to its resolution of 4 July 2006 on the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2006)0293 . ,
ob upoštevanju podaljšanja mandata odbora za tri mesece, kar je Parlament odobril v resoluciji z dne 4. julija 2006, in ponovnega podaljšanja, odobrenega 18. januarja 2007,
having regard to the extension of its mandate for three months as approved in its resolution of 4 July 2006, and the further extension granted on 18 January 2007,
ob upoštevanju člena 176 svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 176 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju končnega poročila Preiskovalnega odbora o krizi družbe "Equitable Life Assurance Society" (A6-0000/2007),
having regard to the final report of the Committee of Inquiry into the crisis of the Equitable Life Assurance Society (A6-0000/2007),
ker člen 193 Pogodbe o ES zagotavlja pravno podlago, da Parlament ustanovi začasni preiskovalni odbor zaradi preverjanja domnevnih kršitev ali nepravilnosti pri izvajanju zakonodaje Skupnosti; ker je to pomemben sestavni del nadzornih pooblastil Parlamenta,
whereas Article 193 of the EC Treaty provides a legal basis for the establishment by Parliament of a temporary Committee of Inquiry to investigate alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of Community law; whereas this constitutes an important element of Parliament's supervisory powers,
ker je bil mandat preiskovalnega odbora: 1) raziskati domnevne kršitve ali nepravilnosti pristojnih oblasti Združenega kraljestva v zvezi z družbo Equitable Life Assurance Society (Equitable Life) pri izvajanju direktive 92/96/EGS z dne 10. novembra 1992 o usklajevanju zakonov, uredb in upravnih določb o neposrednem življenjskem zavarovanju ter spremenjenih Direktive 79/267/EEC in Direktive 90/619/EEC (tretja direktiva o življenjskem zavarovanju UL L 360, 9.12.1992, str.
whereas the mandate of the Committee of Inquiry was to: (1) investigate alleged contraventions or maladministration in the application of Council Directive 92/96/EEC of 10 November 1992 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to direct life assurance and amending Directives 79/267/EEC and 90/619/EEC (third life assurance Directive) OJ L 360, 9.12.1992, p.
Direktiva, ki je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2002/87/ES (UL L 35, 11.2.2003, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2002/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 35, 11.2.2003, p.
Direktiva, ki je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2005/68/ES (UL L 323, 9.12.2005, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 2005/68/EC (OJ L 323, 9.12.2005, p.
1). z dne 5. novembra 2002 o življenjskem zavarovanju, zlasti kar zadeva regulativno ureditev in nadzorovanje finančne trdnosti zavarovalnic, vključno z njihovo solventnostjo, oblikovanjem ustreznih tehničnih ali rezervacij in kritjem rezervacij z ustreznimi sredstvi, 2) oceniti, ali je Komisija ustrezno izpolnila svojo dolžnost nadzorovanja pravilnega in pravočasnega prenosa zakonodaje Skupnosti, ter ugotoviti, ali so k nastalim razmeram prispevale sistematične slabosti, 3) preučiti obtožbe, da izvršilni organi Združenega kraljestva več let, in sicer vsaj od leta 1989 dalje, niso zaščitili imetnikov zavarovalnih polic z izvajanjem strogega nadzora nad računovodskimi postopki in postopki oblikovanja rezervacij ter finančnim stanjem družbe Equitable Life, 4) oceniti status zahtevkov evropskih državljanov, ki niso državljani Združenega kraljestva, in ustreznost pravnih sredstev, ki so zavarovancem iz drugih držav članic na voljo v skladu z zakonodajo Združenega kraljestva in/ali Evropske unije ter 5) oblikovati vse potrebne predloge v zvezi s to zadevo,
1). , by the United Kingdom's competent authorities in relation to the Equitable Life Assurance Society (Equitable Life), notably as regards the regulatory regime and the monitoring of the financial health of insurance undertakings, including their state of solvency, the establishment of adequate technical provisions and the covering of those provisions by matching assets; (2) assess whether the Commission has properly fulfilled its duty to monitor the correct and timely transposition of Community law and identify whether systematic weaknesses contributed to the situation that has arisen; (3) assess allegations that the UK regulators consistently failed, over a number of years, and at least since 1989, to protect policy holders by exercising rigorous supervision of accounting and provisioning practices and the financial situation of Equitable Life; (4) assess the status of claims by non-UK European citizens and the adequacy of remedies available under UK and/or EU legislation for policy-holders from other Member States; and (5) make any proposals that it deems necessary in this matter,
ker je začel preiskovalni odbor delovati 2. februarja 2006, svoje končno poročilo pa je sprejel 8. maja 2007; ker se je sestal 19-krat, izvedel 11 javnih predstavitev, organiziral dve delavnici in napotil dve uradni delegaciji v Dublin in London; ker je zaslišal 46 prič, analiziral 157 dokazov, od katerih jih je bilo 92 objavljenih na spletni strani preiskovalnega odbora, kar skupaj obsega več tisoč strani; ker je poleg tega naročil tri zunanje študije,
whereas the Committee of Inquiry started its work on 2 February 2006 and adopted its final report on 8 May 2007; whereas the Committee of Inquiry met 19 times, held 11 public hearings, organised 2 workshops and sent 2 official delegations to Dublin and London; whereas it heard oral evidence from 46 witnesses, analysed 157 pieces of evidence of which 92 were made public on the Committee of Inquiry's website, amounting to several thousands of pages; whereas it also commissioned 3 external studies,
ker je preiskovalni odbor na podlagi omenjenih dokazov in ukrepov sprejel končno poročilo, v katerem so navedeni vsebina njegove preiskave ter zaključki in priporočila,
whereas, based on the above-mentioned evidence and actions, the Committee of Inquiry has approved a final report setting out the contents of its investigation and its conclusions and recommendations,
naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj stori vse potrebno za objavo končnega poročila preiskovalnega odbora v skladu s členom 176(10) Poslovnika in členom 4(2) Odločbe 95/167/ES;
Instructs its President to take the necessary measures to make public the final report of the Committee of Inquiry, in accordance with Rule 176(10) of its Rules of Procedure and Article 4(2) of Decision 95/167/EC;
poziva Komisijo, Svet in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo na podlagi zaključkov in priporočil sprejeti ukrepi v skladu s členom 176(10) poslovnika Parlamenta in obveznostmi, ki izhajajo iz Odločbe 95/167/ES;
Calls on the Commission, the Council and the Member States to ensure that the conclusions and recommendations of the inquiry are acted upon, in accordance with Rule 176(10) of its Rules of Procedure and the obligations arising from Decision 95/167/EC;
poziva vlado ter izvršilne in nadzorne organe Združenega kraljestva, naj zagotovijo, da bodo na podlagi zaključkov sprejeti ukrepi v skladu z obveznostmi po Odločbi 95/167/ES in splošnimi obveznostmi držav članic po primarnih pogodbah;
Requires the UK Government and the regulatory and supervisory bodies of the UK to ensure that the conclusions of the inquiry are acted upon in accordance with the obligations arising from Article 4 of Decision 95/167/EC and from the general duties of Member States as defined by the Treaties;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo nemudoma sprejeti ukrepi na podlagi zaključkov in priporočil v zvezi s prenosom omenjenih zakonodajnih aktov, in naj o tem poročajo pristojnim odborom Parlamenta;
Requires the Commission to ensure that the conclusions and recommendations on implementation matters are swiftly acted upon and to report back to the competent committees of Parliament;
poziva predsednika, da Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odboru za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov, Odboru za pravne zadeve, Odboru za ustavne zadeve in Odboru za peticije naroči, naj nadzorujejo izvajanje zaključkov in priporočil preiskovalnega odbora, zlasti tiste v zvezi z obveznostjo Evropske komisije za prenos in izplačevanje odškodnin na notranjem trgu ter, če je potrebno, o tem poročajo v skladu s členom 176(11) Poslovnika;
Invites its President to instruct the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, the Committee on Legal Affairs, the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the Committee on Petitions to monitor the implementation of the conclusions and recommendations of the Committee of Inquiry, especially those pertaining to the Commission's responsibilities on transposition and redress issues in the context of the internal market, and, if appropriate, to report thereon, in accordance with Rule 176(11) of its Rules of Procedure;
poziva konferenco predsednikov in delovno skupino za reformo parlamenta, ustanovljeno februarja 2007, naj udejanjita priporočila iz poročila preiskovalnega odbora glede tesnejšega sodelovanja z nacionalnimi parlamenti in boljšega nadzora Parlamenta nad prihodnjo reformo preiskovalnih odborov in njenim potekom za namene izboljšanja njihovega delovanja in učinkovitosti;
Calls on the Conference of Presidents and the working party on parliamentary reform set up in February 2007 to enact the recommendations contained in the Committee of Inquiry's report with respect to closer cooperation with national parliaments and improved oversight by Parliament on implementation issues, as well as on the future reform of inquiry committees, in order to improve their functioning and effectiveness;
naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj priporočilo in končno poročilo preiskovalnega odbora posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation and the final report of the Committee of Inquiry to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
k vprašanjema za ustna odgovora B6‑0020/2007 in B6‑0121/2007
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0020/2007 and B6‑0121/2007
ki ga vlaga Miroslav Ouzký
by Miroslav Ouzký
o strateških ciljih EU za 14. konferenco pogodbenic konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo potekala od 3. do 15. junija 2007 v Haagu
on the EU strategic objectives for the 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), be held in The Hague, 3-15 June 2007
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strateških ciljih EU za 14. konferenco pogodbenic konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo potekala od 3. do 15. junija 2007 v Haagu
European Parliament resolution on the EU strategic objectives for the 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), be held in The Hague, 3-15 June 2007
ob upoštevanju 14. konference pogodbenic Konvencije o mednarodni trgovini z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami (CITES), ki bo potekala od 3. do 15. junija 2007 v Haagu, na Nizozemskem,
having regard to the 14th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP 14) to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), to be held from 3 to 15 June 2007 in The Hague, the Netherlands,
ker je CITES s 169 pogodbenicami konvencije, vključno s 27 državami članicami, najobširnejši svetovni sporazum o ohranjanju prostoživečih živali, ki preprečuje prekomerno izkoriščanje prostoživečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst zaradi mednarodne trgovine,
whereas CITES is the largest global wildlife conservation agreement in existence, preventing the over-exploitation of wild fauna and flora through international trade, with 169 parties, including the 27 Member States,
ker so človeška poraba naravnih virov, uničevanje življenjskega prostora, podnebne spremembe, prekomerno izkoriščanje prostoživečih vrst in nezakonita trgovina s prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami glavni razlogi za osiromašenje biološke raznolikosti na zemlji,
whereas human consumption of natural resources, habitat destruction, climate change, over-exploitation of wild species and illegal trade in wild fauna and flora are the main causes of the impoverishment of the earth’s biodiversity,
ker je na podlagi strokovnih poročil mogoče sklepati, da bodo podnebne spremembe povečale izgubo biološke raznolikosti in poslabšale položaj ogroženih vrst,
whereas scientific reports predict that climate change will exacerbate the loss of biodiversity and the situation of endangered species,
ker je javna ozaveščenost v državah porabnicah bila in ostaja bistvena za nadzor divjega lova in nezakonite mednarodne trgovine z ogroženimi prostoživečimi živalskimi in rastlinskimi vrstami,
whereas public awareness in consumer countries has been, and remains, essential to the control of poaching and illegal international trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora,
ker nezakonita trgovina resno ogroža svetovni načrt okoljske in razvojne trajnosti,
whereas illegal trade seriously undermines the global agenda of environmental and developmental sustainability,
ker strategija EU za trajnostni razvoj nudi okvir za odgovorno in trajnostno upravljanje naravnih virov,
whereas the EU’s Sustainable Development Strategy provides the framework for responsible and sustainable management of natural resources,
ker je med predsedovanjem Velike Britanije na delavnici o usklajevanju EU pri izvajanju zakonodaje na področju trgovine s prostoživečimi živalmi ( EU Wildlife Trade Enforcement Coordination ), ki je potekala oktobra 2005, nastal osnutek akcijskega načrta za uveljavljanje predpisov EU, ki je bil množično sprejet,
whereas a UK Presidency workshop on ‘EU Wildlife Trade Enforcement Coordination’, held in October 2005, resulted in a widely endorsed draft EU Enforcement Action Plan,
ker konvencija CITES dopolnjuje delo Organizacije Združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO) in drugih mednarodnih organov pri ohranjanju morskih vrst, ki bi jih lahko ogrozila mednarodna trgovina,
whereas CITES has a complementary role to that of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and other international bodies in the conservation of marine species which may be threatened by international trade,
ker je Mednarodna komisija za lov na kite, ki jo je konvencija CITES priznala kot organ, ki je pristojen za uravnavanje ohranjanja in upravljanja s kiti, predpisala moratorij na komercialni lov na kite, veljaven po vsem svetu,
whereas the International Whaling Commission (IWC), recognised by CITES as the body having authority to regulate the conservation and management of whales, has decreed a worldwide moratorium on commercial whaling,
ker je Evropski parlament julija 2005 Resolucija o hitrejšem izvajanju akcijskega načrta EU za uveljavljanje zakonodaje, upravljanje in trgovanje v gozdarskem sektorju (FLEGT), UL C 157 E/482, 6.7.2006. izrazil razočaranje nad izjemno počasnim napredkom pri postopku uveljavljanja zakonodaje, upravljanja in trgovanja v gozdarskem sektorju; ker so zaradi pomanjkanja obvezne in celovite zakonodaje, ki bi preprečevala uvoz nezakonito in netrajnostno posekanega lesa v EU, nujne pobude konvencije CITES za ureditev mednarodne trgovine z vrstami lesa,
whereas the European Parliament in July 2005 EP Resolution on speeding up implementation of the EU action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) OJ C 157 E/482, 6.7.2006. expressed its disappointment regarding the ‘extraordinarily slow progress’ in the Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade process (FLEGT); whereas in the absence of compulsory and comprehensive regulations prohibiting the importing of illegal and unsustainably harvested timber into the EU, CITES initiatives to regulate international trade in timber species are essential,