natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ponovno opozarja, da je treba v proračunu Skupnosti ohraniti neposredno povezavo pomoči organizacijam proizvajalcev in uvesti možnost dopolnilne pomoči za podporo operativnim programom s strani držav članic, kot predlaga v svojem zgoraj omenjenem stališču z dne 2. decembra 1999; poziva, da se zato spremeni člena 10 Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000;
Reaffirms the need to maintain the direct link of aid to the producers' organisations in the Community budget, while also opening up the possibility of complementary aids in support of the operational programmes on the part of the Member States, as proposed in its above-mentioned position of 2 December 1999; calls for Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 to be amended to this effect;
meni, da je treba opraviti študijo o vzrokih za neuspeh možnosti za ustanavljanje medpanožnih organizacij, ki je bila uvedena z revizijo skupne ureditve trgov za ribiške proizvode leta 2000, kot je navedeno v sklepu 4 zgoraj navedenega poročila Komisije z dne 29. septembra 2006;
Considers it necessary to carry out a study of the causes of the failure of the option of creating inter-professional organisations introduced in the 2000 revision of the COM in fisheries products, and as referred to in conclusion 4 of the Commission's above-mentioned report of 29 September 2006;
podpira pobudo za uvedbo kodeksa ravnanja za ribiške proizvode v Evropski uniji, ki bi zajel vse udeležence v sektorju, da bi opredelili prostovoljna pravila za zagotavljanje pravičnejše delitve dodane vrednosti in pravila trženja po vsej vrednostni verigi;
Supports the initiative of introducing a code of conduct governing trade in fisheries products in the European Union which would cover all participants in the sector, with the aim of defining voluntary rules in order to ensure a fairer sharing of value added and marketing rules along the value chain;
poudarja pomen ustanavljanja izvornih trgov in trgov tradicionalnih proizvodov izjemne kakovosti, podprtih s sejmi, malimi podjetji in restavracijami, kar povečuje dodano vrednost lokalnih proizvodov in spodbuja lokalni razvoj;
Stresses the importance of creating markets of origin and of traditional products of particular quality, to be backed up by fairs, small businesses and the catering industry, as a means of boosting the value added of local products and promoting local development;
priporoča, da Komisija oceni posledice odnosov s tretjimi državami, zlasti vpliv uvoženih proizvodov na cene prve prodaje; poziva Komisijo k večji strogosti pri presoji zunanjih trgovinskih odnosov, zlasti pri aktiviranju varnostnih ukrepov v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije, kot je navedeno v členu 30 Uredbe (ES) št. 104/2000, da ne bi bili ogroženi cilji iz člena 33 Pogodbe;
Recommends that the Commission evaluate the consequences of relations with third countries, and notably the impact of imports on prices at the initial point of sale; calls on the Commission to take a firmer line in its evaluation of external trade relations, especially when activating the WTO safeguard mechanisms referred to in Article 30 of Regulation (EC) 104/2000, so as not to jeopardise the objectives of Article 33 of the Treaty;
meni, da je treba za uvožene ribiške proizvode, ki so v prodaji na notranjem trgu, uporabljajo ista pravila in zahteve kot za ribiške proizvode Skupnosti, npr. glede označevanja, higienskih in zdravstvenih predpisov ali prepovedi vstopa na trg Skupnosti ribiškim proizvodom pod najmanjšimi velikostmi, dovoljenimi za proizvode Skupnosti;
Believes that it is vital to apply to imported fisheries products sold and marketed on the internal market the same rules and requirements as those applied to Community fisheries products, e.g. in terms of labelling, hygiene and health rules or the prohibition on the entry onto the Community market of fisheries products below the minimum sizes authorised for Community products;
meni, da je treba pri prihodnji reviziji nujno zagotoviti več finančnih sredstev za skupno ureditev trgov za ribiške proizvode;
Believes it essential to provide increased funding for the COM in fishery products in the forthcoming revision;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2007 o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o skupnih predpisih na področju civilnega letalstva in ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost v letalstvu in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 91/670/EGS, Uredbe (ES) št. 1592/2002 in Direktive 2004/36/ES (10537/3/2007 – C6-0353/2007 – 2005/0228(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2007 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency, and repealing Council Directive 91/670/EEC, Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 and Directive 2004/36/EC (10537/3/2007 – C6-0353/2007 – 2005/0228(COD) )
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (10537/3/2007 – C6-0353/2007 ) UL C 277 E, 20.11.2007, str.
having regard to the Council common position (10537/3/2007 – C6-0353/2007 ) OJ C 277 E, 20.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave Sprejeta besedila z dne 14. marca 2007, P6_TA(2007)0067 .
having regard to its position at first reading Texts adopted, 14.3.2007, P6_TA(2007)0067 .
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0579 ),
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0579 ),
ob upoštevanju priloženih izjav Komisije,
having regard to the statements of the Commission annexed hereto,
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0482/2007 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0482/2007 ),
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta iz druge obravnave enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Uredbi (ES) št. 216/2008.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at second reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 216/2008.)
V zvezi s členom 64 Komisija navaja, da bo pri spreminjanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 593/2007 o taksah in dajatvah, ki jih obračunava Evropska agencija za varnost v letalstvu, ustrezno pozorna na poseben položaj MSP in predvsem na vpliv, ki ga lahko ima višina taks in dajatev na njihovo ekonomsko sposobnost, in hkrati še naprej zagotavljala, da se upošteva načelo nediskriminacije ter da prihodek od certifikacijskih dejavnosti Agencije še naprej zadošča za pokritje celotnih stroškov opravljenih storitev.
As regards Article 64, the Commission states that, when amending Commission Regulation (EC) 593/2007 on the fees and charges levied by the European aviation Safety Agency, the Commission will pay due attention to the specific situation of SME's, and in particular to the impact that level of the fees and charges may have on their economic viability, whilst continuing to ensure both compliance with the principle of non discrimination and that the revenue from the certification activity of the Agency remains sufficient to cover the full cost of the services delivered.
Člen 3(j)(i), četrta alinea
Article 3, point (j), point (i), fourth indent
V zvezi z opredelitvijo izraza "tehnološko zahtevni zrakoplov na motorni pogon" bo Komisija ocenila ekonomski učinek na trge, ki ga ima vključitev letal s turboreaktivnimi motorji ali več kot enim turbopropelerskim motorjem v to opredelitev, in bo Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu prosila, da spremlja njihovo varnost.
As regards the definition of complex motor-powered aircraft the Commission will assess the economic impact on markets of the inclusion of aeroplanes equipped with turbojet engines or more than one turboprop engine in such a definition and will request the European Aviation Safety Agency to monitor their safety performance.
Priloga II, točka (e) (ultra lahki zrakoplovi)
Annex II, point (e) (ultra light aircraft)
Komisija bo prosila Evropsko agencijo za varnost v letalstvu, da izvede uradna posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi in predloži obrazloženo mnenje glede spremembe točke (e) Priloge II z namenom, da se vanjo vključijo ultra lahki zrakoplovi z manj kot 600 kg, če je to potrebno.
The Commission will request the European Aviation Safety Agency to conduct formal consultations of all stakeholders and to submit a reasoned opinion for a change to Annex II point (e), aimed at including in it ultra light aircraft of less than 600 Kg, if necessary.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2007 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1924/2006 o prehranskih in zdravstvenih trditvah na živilih ( KOM(2007)0368 – C6-0200/2007 – 2007/0128(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2007 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods ( COM(2007)0368 – C6-0200/2007 – 2007/0128(COD) )
(Postopek soodločanja: prva obravnava)
(Codecision preocedure: first reading)
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2007)0368 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2007)0368 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0200/2007 ),
having regard to Articles 251(2) and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0200/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0464/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0464/2007 ),
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2007 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive 98/71/ES o pravnem varstvu modelov ( KOM(2004)0582 – C6-0119/2004 – 2004/0203(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs ( COM(2004)0582 – C6-0119/2004 – 2004/0203(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0582 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0582 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0119/2004 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0119/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6-0453/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0453/2007 ),
Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2007.
Position of the European Parliament of 12 December 2007.
, če se tretjim strankam omogočita izdelava in distribucija nadomestnih delov, ║║i
Such protection would come close to an abuse of the design regime.
dejansko dodeljen monopol nad izdelkom.
parties are allowed to produce and distribute spare parts, competition is maintained.
ker razlike v zakonih držav članic o uporabi varovanih modelov v namen omogočanja popravila kompleksnega izdelka, tako da se ponovno vzpostavi njegov prvotni videz, kjer se videz izdelka uporablja ali je vključen v izdelek, ki je sestavni del kompleksnega izdelka, od videza katerega je odvisen varovani model, neposredno vplivajo na vzpostavitev in delovanje notranjega trga, kar zadeva blago, ki vključuje modele; ║take razlike
║ The differences in the laws of the Member States on the use of protected designs for the purpose of permitting the repair of a complex product so as to restore its original appearance, where the product incorporating the design or to which the design is applied constitutes a component part of a complex product upon whose appearance the protected design is dependent, directly affect the establishment and functioning of the internal market as regards goods embodying designs.
z dne 31. julija 2002 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za skupine vertikalnih sporazumov in usklajenih ravnanj na področju motornih vozil
of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector
je treba zagotoviti
it must be ensured
Direktiva 2007/46/ES Evropskega Parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. septembra 2007 o vzpostavitvi okvira za odobritev motornih in priklopnih vozil ter sistemov, sestavnih delov in samostojnih tehničnih enot, namenjenih za taka vozila
Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles
Direktivo 98/71/ES
Directive 98/71/EC
je treba ustrezno spremeniti –
should be amended accordingly
Modeli, vgrajeni v sestavne dele, ki se uporabljajo za popravilo
Designs incorporated in component parts used for repair purposes
v izdelek vgrajen ali na njem uporabljen
that is incorporated in or applied to a product
model, ki predstavlja sestavni del
which constitutes a component part of a complex product
izdelka, ki se uporablja v smislu člena 12(1) ║
used within the meaning of Article 12(1) ║for the
Ta določba se ne uporablja, če osnovni namen dajanja omenjenega sestavnega dela na trg ni popravilo celovitega izdelka.
This provision shall not apply where the primary purpose of putting the aforesaid component part on the market is other than the repair of the complex product.
Odstavek 1 se uporablja, če so
Paragraph 1 shall apply provided
izdelka, uporabljenega za popravilo, z oznakami, kakršni sta blagovna znamka ali ime podjetja, ali v drugi ustrezni obliki
the product used for the repair by the use of a marking, such as a trade mark or a trade name, or in another appropriate form
, tako da lahko ti osveščeno izbirajo med konkurenčnimi
so that they can make an informed choice between competing
izdelki, ki se uporabljajo za popravilo
products offered for use in effecting the repair
Države članice, v skladu z obstoječo zakonodajo katere obstaja varstvo za model, ki je vgrajen v ali uporabljen na izdelku, ki je sestavni del celovitega izdelka in se uporabi v smislu člena 12(1) Direktive 98/71/ES zgolj za popravilo tega celovitega izdelka, da bi se obnovil njegov prvotni videz, lahko to varstvo modela ohranijo do ...
Member States under whose existing legislation protection as a design exists for a design that is incorporated in or applied to a product which constitutes a component part of a complex product and is used within the meaning of Article 12(1) of Directive 98/71/EC for the sole purpose of the repair of that complex product so as to restore its original appearance, may retain that design protection until …
Pet let po datumu začetka veljavnosti te direktive.
Five years after the date of entry into force of this Directive.
Dve leti po datumu sprejetja te direktive.
Two years after the date of adoption of this Directive.
║ Države članice
When Member States adopt those
države članice║.
Member States║.
Države članice sporočijo Komisiji vsebino besedila glavnih določb nacionalne zakonodaje, ki jo sprejmejo na področju, ki ga ureja ta direktiva.
Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. decembra 2007 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o skupni ureditvi trga za vino in spremembi nekaterih uredb ( KOM(2007)0372 – C6-0254/2007 – 2007/0138(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 December 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the common organisation of the market in wine and amending certain Regulations ( COM(2007)0372 – C6-0254/2007 – 2007/0138(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2007)0372 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2007)0372 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 36 in 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerima se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6–0254/2007 ),
having regard to Articles 36 and 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0254/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0477/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0477/2007 ),
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 UVODNA IZJAVA 1 A (novo)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 RECITAL 1 A
Evropska unija je z več kot milijonom in pol vinogradniških podjetij največji proizvajalec, izvoznik in porabnik vina na svetu.
The European Union is the world's leading wine producer, with over one and a half million wine-producing holdings, and is both the leading exporter and consumer at international level.
Kljub povečanju prodaje kakovostnih vin in izvoza iz Skupnosti, pa skupna
Despite an increase in sales of quality wines and in wine exports from the Community, total
iz Skupnosti od leta 1996 narašča mnogo počasneje od uvoza
since 1996,
ravnotežje med ponudbo in povpraševanjem
balance between supply and demand
pri nekaterih vinih
for some wines,
, to pa ustvarja pritisk na cene in prihodke proizvajalcev.
which in turn puts producers" prices and incomes under pressure.
Ukrepi tržnega mehanizma
market mechanism measures,
, kot je krizna destilacija,
such as crisis distillation,
so se izkazali za stroškovno neučinkovite in so spodbujali strukturne presežke, ne da bi zato zahtevali izboljšave v ustreznih konkurenčnih strukturah.
have proved cost-inefficient to the extent that they have encouraged structural surpluses without requiring improvements in the relevant competitive structures.
Vsi instrumenti, ki so trenutno vključeni v Uredbo (ES) št. 1493/1999, se niso izkazali za učinkovite pri usmerjanju sektorja h konkurenčnemu in trajnostnemu razvoju.
Not all the instruments currently included in Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 have proved effective in steering the sector towards a competitive and sustainable development.
ukrepi tržnega mehanizma so se izkazali za stroškovno neučinkovite in so spodbujali strukturne presežke, ne da bi zato zahtevali izboljšave v ustreznih konkurenčnih strukturah.
market mechanism measures have proved cost-inefficient to the extent that they have encouraged structural surpluses without requiring improvements in the relevant competitive structures.
Sprememba 4 UVODNA IZJAVA 3 A (novo)
Amendment 4 RECITAL 3 A (new)
Vrednost razpoložljivih sredstev za več kot 14 % proizvodnje Skupnosti je približno 5 200 000 000 EUR.
The value of the balance in hand of over 14% of Community output is in the order of EUR 5 200 000 000.
Realizirati jo je mogoče s ciljnim povečanjem notranjih potrošnikov na 75 milijonov ali s promocijo izvoza v tretje države, v katerih obstaja realno povpraševanje na stotine milijonov potrošnikov, ki ustreza precejšnjemu povečanju dohodkov v tem sektorju.
That value could be realised via a targeted increase of 75 million new domestic consumers or by promoting exports to third countries, where there is an effective demand of hundreds of millions of consumers, equating to a considerable increase in revenue for the sector.
Sprememba 5 UVODNA IZJAVA 3 B (novo)
Amendment 5 RECITAL 3 B (new)
Takojšnja odprava tržnih ukrepov iz sedanje skupne ureditve trga bo zelo negativno vplivala na sektor, zato je treba določiti prehodno obdobje med sedanjo in prihodnjo skupno ureditvijo trga.
Immediate withdrawal of the market measures under the current common organisation of the market (COM) will greatly damage the sector, for which reason there should be a transitional period between the current and the future COM.
Sprememba 6 UVODNA IZJAVA 5 (5)
Amendment 6 RECITAL 5 (5)
Glede na pridobljene izkušnje je zato primerno, da se temeljito spremeni ureditev Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za vinski sektor, in sicer za doseganje naslednjih ciljev: povečati konkurenčnost vinarjev Skupnosti; okrepiti sloves kakovostnega vina iz Skupnosti kot najboljšega na svetu; povrniti stare trge in pridobiti nove v Skupnosti in drugod po svetu; oblikovati ureditev za vino, ki deluje po jasnih, preprostih in učinkovitih pravilih, ki uravnotežijo ponudbo in povpraševanje; oblikovati ureditev za vino, ki ohranja najboljše tradicije vinarstva Skupnosti, utrditi družbene strukture na številnih podeželskih območjih in zagotoviti, da vsa proizvodnja spoštuje okolje.
In the light of the experience gained it is therefore appropriate to fundamentally change the Community regime applying to the wine sector with a view to achieving the following objectives: increasing the competitiveness of the Community's wine producers; strengthening the reputation of Community quality wine as the best in the world; recovering old markets and winning new ones in the Community and worldwide; creating a wine regime that operates through clear, simple and effective rules that balance supply and demand; creating a wine regime that preserves the best traditions of Community wine production, reinforcing the social fabric of many rural areas, and ensuring that all production respects the environment.
Glede na pridobljene izkušnje je zato primerno, da se temeljito spremeni ureditev Skupnosti, ki se uporablja za vinski sektor, in sicer za doseganje naslednjih ciljev: povečati konkurenčnost vinarjev Skupnosti; okrepiti sloves kakovostnega vina iz Skupnosti kot najboljšega na svetu; povrniti stare trge in pridobiti nove v Skupnosti in drugod po svetu
In the light of the experience gained it is therefore appropriate to fundamentally change the Community regime applying to the wine sector with a view to achieving the following objectives: increasing the competitiveness of the Community's wine producers; strengthening the reputation of Community quality wine as the best in the world; recovering old markets and winning new ones in the Community and worldwide
, zlasti ob upoštevanju stalno naraščajočega povpraševanja na azijskih trgih v vzponu, ki so za evropske proizvajalce vina vir konkurenčnosti in priložnosti
, having regard, in particular, to the steadily growing demand in the Asian emerging markets, which offers competition and opportunities for European wine producers
; oblikovati ureditev za vino, ki deluje po jasnih, preprostih in učinkovitih pravilih, ki uravnotežijo ponudbo in povpraševanje; oblikovati ureditev za vino, ki ohranja najboljše tradicije vinarstva Skupnosti
; creating a wine regime that operates through clear, simple and effective rules that balance supply and demand; creating a wine regime that preserves the best traditions of Community wine production,
in izboljšuje življenjski standard kmetov
improving grape producers' living standards,
, utrditi družbene strukture na številnih podeželskih območjih in zagotoviti, da vsa proizvodnja spoštuje okolje.
reinforcing the social fabric of many rural areas, and ensuring that all production respects the environment.
Sprememba 7 UVODNA IZJAVA 5 A (novo)
Amendment 7 RECITAL 5 A (new)
Skupna ureditev trga za vino bi morala ustvariti skupne pogoje, ki bi vinskemu sektorju omogočili avtonomno odzivanje na potrebe na trgih in bi vključevali interese potrošnikov, enake možnosti za vinogradniška gospodarstva (tudi za predelavo) znotraj držav članic in med njimi ter tudi okoljska vprašanja.
The COM in wine should create an environment which will enable the wine sector to act independently in response to market requirements, whilst taking account of the interests of consumers, the need for equal opportunities for wine-growing and processing firms within Member States and between Member States, and environmental concerns.
Sprememba 8 Uvodna izjava 9 (9)
Amendment 8 RECITAL 9 (9)