natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja napredek, dosežen pri oblikovanju struktur, ki so potrebne za decentralizirano upravljanje predpristopne pomoči; podpira prizadevanja vlade za okrepitev upravnih zmogljivosti, kar bo omogočilo izvajanje sklepa Komisije, da upravljanje predpristopne pomoči zaupa nacionalnim organom;
Welcomes the progress achieved in the establishment of necessary structures for decentralised management of Pre-accession Assistance (IPA); supports the efforts made by the government to build up administrative capacities that will permit implementation of the Commission's decision to entrust the management of IPA to the national authorities;
ugotavlja, da je Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija podobno kot večina držav članic EU na podlagi odločitve parlamenta, ki je imela široko podporo, priznala neodvisnost sosednjega Kosova ob istem času, kot je to storila Črna gora, navkljub težavam, ki bi jih na kratek rok to utegnilo predstavljati za želeno ohranjanje dobrih odnosov s Srbijo, ki je ravno tako soseda te države; pozdravlja doseženi sporazum s kosovskimi oblastmi glede določitve meje;
Observes that, like most EU Member States, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, following a widely supported decision by its Parliament, recognised, at the same time as Montenegro, the independence of the country's neighbour Kosovo, despite the difficulties which this might cause in the short term to the desired preservation of good relations with another neighbouring country, Serbia; welcomes the agreement reached with the Kosovo authorities concerning the demarcation of the border;
podpira prizadevanja posrednika Matthewa Nimetza v okviru Združenih narodov, kot so predvidena v resolucijah Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov S/RES/817 in S/RES/845 iz leta 1993 ter so usmerjena v rešitev nesoglasij, do katerih je prišlo zaradi ustavnega imena države, da se čim prej doseže dokončni dogovor med Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo in Grčijo na podlagi njegovega predloga z dne 6. oktobra 2008 o tem, kako bi bilo mogoče na mednarodni ravni pojasniti razliko med različnimi območji, ki pripadajo različnim državam, vendar jim je skupno dejstvo, da se vsa imenujejo Makedonija; se zaveda, da imata obe strani zadržke do tega predloga; je seznanjen, da je bil imenovan nov pogajalec za Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo; poziva obe strani, naj ohranita zavezo do pogovorov pod okriljem Združenih narodov in dosežeta kompromisno rešitev, da to vprašanje ne bo še naprej predstavljalo ovire za članstvo Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije v mednarodnih organizacijah, kot je določeno v prej omenjenem Začasnem sporazumu iz leta 1995, ki še vedno velja; opozarja, da bi lahko v primeru, če med državama ne bo kmalu dosežen dogovor, to pripeljalo do dolgega odloga pri pristopu Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije k EU; meni, da tovrstna odprta dvostranska vprašanja na Balkanu ne bi smela ovirati pristopa ali imeti prednosti pred procesom evropskega povezovanja;
Supports the efforts of mediator Matthew Nimetz within the UN, as envisaged by the above-mentioned UN Security Council resolutions S/RES/817 and S/RES/845 of 1993, aimed at resolving the differences that have arisen over the constitutional name of the state in order to reach final agreement between the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece as soon as possible, on the basis of his proposal of 6 October 2008 as to how the distinction between the various areas which belong to different states but have in common the fact that they are called Macedonia can be clarified internationally; realises that this proposal is viewed with hesitation by both parties; takes note of the appointment of the new negotiator for the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia; requests both parties to remain committed to the talks under the auspices of the UN and to reach a compromise solution, so that the issue does not continue to represent an obstacle to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia's membership of international organisations, as provided for in the above-mentioned Interim Accord of 1995, which is still in force; warns that unless agreement is reached quickly between the two states, this could result in a long delay in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia joining the EU; takes the view that such outstanding bilateral issues in the Balkans should not obstruct accession or take precedence over the process of European integration;
je seznanjen z vlogo, ki jo je Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija predložila Meddržavnemu sodišču glede člena 11 Začasnega sporazuma; izraža upanje, da bosta Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija in Grčija ohranili zavezo, da nadaljujeta s pogajanji, kljub začetku sodnega postopka pred Meddržavnim sodiščem v zvezi z izvajanjem Začasnega sporazuma; glede na nov krog pogajanj, ki je bil napovedan v okviru tako imenovanega Nimetzovega procesa, izraža upanje, da bodo vse vlade v soseščini podprle vključitev te države v EU in tako prispevale k stabilnosti in blaginji regije;
Takes note of the application filed by the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia with the International Court of Justice concerning Article 11 of the Interim Accord; expresses the hope that the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Greece remain committed to continuing the negotiations despite the legal proceedings instituted before the International Court of Justice concerning the application of the Interim Accord; in view of the new round of negotiations announced under the "Nimetz process", expresses the hope that all governments in the neighbourhood will support the integration of this country in the EU, thus contributing to the stability and prosperity of the region;
pozdravlja prizadevanja oblasti Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije za sodelovanje s sosednjimi državami članicami EU, da se tako ponovno preučijo morebitna razhajanja in različne razlage zgodovine, ki lahko povzročajo nesoglasja, in poziva k spodbujanju skupne proslavitve kulturne in zgodovinske dediščine, ki jo ta država deli s svojimi sosedami; je zaskrbljen zaradi pomanjkanja napredka v boju proti ponovnemu pojavu "sovražnega govora" proti sosednjim državam, zlasti v medijih in v šolskem sistemu, ter še naprej poziva vlado, naj zagotovi javno izpolnjevanje ustreznih standardov EU in Sveta Evrope;
Welcomes the efforts of the authorities of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to work together with neighbouring EU Member States with a view to reviewing possible discrepancies and misinterpretations of history that may cause disagreements, and urges promotion of the joint celebration of the common cultural and historic heritage shared between the country and its neighbours; is concerned about the lack of progress in countering the resurgence of "hate speech", particularly in the media and the education system, against neighbouring states, and continues to urge the government to ensure public compliance with relevant EU and Council of Europe standards;
poziva vlado, naj zaostri boj proti povezavam med organiziranim kriminalom v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji, Črni gori, na Kosovu in v Albaniji;
Calls on the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to step up the fight against the links between organised crime in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosovo and Albania;
obžaluje dejstvo, da novi zakon z dne 20. septembra 2007 o pravnem statusu cerkve, verske skupnosti in verske skupine še ni privedel do tega, da bi pripadniki različnih veroizpovedi občutili, da imajo enake možnosti za priznavanje pripadnosti svoji veri in za njeno širjenje ter da imajo lahko v lasti, uporabljajo in gradijo poslopja za te namene, kot to počneta dve veroizpovedi, ki sta tradicionalno največji v državi – "makedonska" pravoslavna cerkev in islam; opozarja, da je obveznost oblasti, da varujejo strpnost do tistih, katerih prepričanja so drugačna, in pravico do verske raznolikosti;
Deplores the fact that the new law of 20 September 2007 on the legal status of a church, a religious community and a religious group, has not yet resulted in adherents of different faiths feeling that they have the same opportunities to confess and propagate their faith and to own, use and establish buildings for these purposes as do the two denominations which have traditionally been the largest in the country, namely the 'Macedonian' Orthodox Church and Islam; recalls that the authorities have a duty to protect tolerance towards those whose convictions are different and the right to religious diversity;
ugotavlja, da tudi po sprejetju sprememb zakona o zaposlovanju iz leta 2005 še vedno ni jasno, kako lahko različni soobstoječi sindikati sklepajo pravno veljavne pogodbe z vlado in podjetniki, zlasti glede na sedanjo obveznost sindikatov, da morajo – če hočejo biti stranke v pogodbi – predstavljati 33 % zadevnih zaposlenih, to pa je ovira za raznolikost in zainteresirane strani zato nenehno sprožajo dvome o obsegu članstva teh sindikatov;
Observes that, even since the adoption of amendments to the Employment Law of 2005, it is still not clear how the various co-existing trade unions can conclude legally valid contracts with the government and entrepreneurs, in particular given the current obligation for trade unions to represent 33% of the employees concerned before they can become contracting partners, which is an obstacle to diversity and leads interested parties constantly to call into question the membership levels of these trade unions;
poziva vlado, naj hitro razvije nova odlagališča odpadkov, zapre in očisti stara odlagališča odpadkov, medtem pa naj razvije praktične ukrepe za posodobitev integriranega cikla odpadkov, vključno z ločenim zbiranjem odpadkov, med drugim s strani konzorcijev, ter naj postavi naprave za pridobivanje energije in goriva iz odpadkov;
Calls on the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia rapidly to develop new refuse disposal sites, to close and clear old refuse disposal sites, in the meantime developing practical measures to update the integrated waste cycle, including differentiated waste collection, inter alia by syndicates, and to establish waste-to-energy plants and waste-to-fuel plants;
poziva k izboljšanju in ohranitvi kakovosti in gladine vode v mejnih Ohridskem jezeru, Prespanskem jezeru in Dojranskem jezeru ter da se o tej zadevi sklenejo učinkoviti sporazumi s sosednjima Albanijo in Grčijo; obenem pozdravlja predlagani osnutek zakona o upravljanju z vodami in poziva, naj ga parlament nemudoma obravnava;
Calls for the quality and level of the water in the border lakes Ohrid, Prespa and Dojran to be improved and preserved and for effective agreements on the matter with neighbours Albania and Greece; also welcomes the proposed draft law on water management and urges that it be considered by its Parliament without delay;
z vznemirjenjem opaža negativne posledice, ki jih na ljudeh in okolju pušča naftna rafinerija OKTA, ki obratuje v mestu Ilinden blizu Skopja in šteje za največjega onesnaževalca v državi;
Has noted with alarm the negative effects on human beings and the environment of the OKTA oil refinery that is in operation in the town of Ilinden near Skopje and is regarded as the country's biggest polluter;
poziva vlado, naj spet sproži postopek liberalizacije in privatizacije lokalnih javnih storitev, pri čemer naj posebno pozornost nameni sektorjem proizvodnje in distribucije električne energije ter prometa z električno energijo;
Asks the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to relaunch the process of liberalisation and privatisation of local public services, paying particular attention to the electricity production, transport and distribution industries;
spodbuja vlado, naj pospeši načrtovanje in proizvodnjo energije iz obnovljivih virov, zlasti kar zadeva sončno in vetrno energijo; v zvezi s tem poziva oblasti v Skopju, naj si v največji možni meri prizadevajo za razvoj energetske politike, ki bo skladna s cilji EU, in naj podpirajo stališče EU na prihodnji konferenci o po-kjotskem sporazumu v Köbenhavnu;
Encourages the Government to accelerate planning and production from renewable sources with regard, in particular, to solar and wind energy; in this regard, calls on the Skopje authorities to make every effort to develop an energy policy in line with the targets of the EU and to support the EU's position at the forthcoming conference in Copenhagen on a post-Kyoto treaty;
pridružuje se Uradu visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za begunce pri izražanju zadovoljstva nad dejstvom, da doslej nobena od manjšin, ki so pribežale s Kosova in katerih pripadniki niso pridobili statusa oseb s stalnim prebivališčem, še ni bila prisiljena k odhodu, ter upa, da bo kmalu dosežen dogovor med vlado in Uradom visokega komisarja za begunce o odgovornosti za finančno podporo tej skupini;
Joins the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in welcoming the fact that so far none of the minorities who have fled from Kosovo whose members have not acquired permanent resident status have been compelled to leave, and hopes that agreement will soon be reached between the government and the UNHCR on responsibility for financially supporting this group;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter vladi in parlamentu Nekdanje jugoslovanske republike Makedonije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Government and Parliament of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu z dne 12. marca 2009 o mandatu Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo ( 2008/2290(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation to the Council of 12 March 2009 on the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ( 2008/2290(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki so ga predložili Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck in drugi v imenu skupine ALDE, o mandatu Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča za nekdanjo Jugoslavijo ("sodišča") ( B6-0417/2008 ), ki zajema republike, ki sestavljajo ozemlje, ki je bilo do 25. junija 1991 Socialistična federativna republika Jugoslavija, torej Bosno in Hercegovino, Črno goro, Hrvaško, Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo, Srbijo, Kosovo in Slovenijo,
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council, submitted by Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck and others on behalf of the ALDE Group, on the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ("the Tribunal") ( B6-0417/2008 ), covering the republics that make up the territory that was, until 25 June 1991, the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, i.e. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Kosovo and Slovenia,
ob upoštevanju, da gre za sodišče Združenih narodov, ki deluje v Evropi in obravnava evropske zadeve, da je bilo ustanovljeno leta 1993 kot začasna institucija posebej zato, da bi preiskalo resne kršitve mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, do katerih je prišlo v nekdanji Jugoslaviji po letu 1991, ter sodno preganjalo odgovorne za to,
having regard to the fact that the Tribunal is a United Nations court of law, operating in Europe and dealing with European issues, set up in 1993 as a temporary institution specifically to investigate serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in the former Yugoslavia since 1991 and to prosecute those responsible,
ob upoštevanju, da v tem času sodni sistemi v nekdanji Jugoslaviji niso bili sposobni ali pripravljeni preiskovati in sodno preganjati najbolj odgovornih,
having regard to the fact that, at the time, the domestic judicial systems in the former Yugoslavia were not able or willing to investigate and prosecute those most responsible,
ob upoštevanju, da je sodišče vložilo obtožnice proti 161 posameznikom, da je končalo postopke proti 116 obtoženim, da so pred sodiščem postopki proti obtoženim trenutno v različnih fazah, da so postopki le pri petih obtoženih še v fazi pred sojenjem, obtoženi pa čakajo na začetek sojenja, ter da sta od vseh obtoženih posameznikov le dva še vedno na begu – Ratko Mladić in Goran Hadžić Pismo predsednika mednarodnega sodišča Varnostnemu svetu Združenih narodov, S/2008/729, 24. november 2008.
having regard to the fact that the Tribunal has indicted 161 individuals, that it has completed proceedings against 116 accused, that currently numerous accused are at different stages of proceedings before the Tribunal, that only five accused remain in the pre-trial stage, awaiting the commencement of their trials, and that out of the indicted individuals only two of them, Ratko Mladić and Goran Hadžić, still remain at large Letter from the President of the International Tribunal to the UN Security Council, S/2008/729, 24 November 2008.
ob upoštevanju resolucij Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov S/RES/1503(2003) in S/RES/1534(2004), v katerih se sodišče poziva, naj sprejme vse možne ukrepe, da bi končalo svoje delo do konca leta 2010 ("zaključna strategija"),
having regard to resolutions S/RES/1503 (2003) and S/RES/1534 (2004) of the UN Security Council calling upon the Tribunal to take all possible measures to complete all its work by the end of 2010 ("the completion strategy"),
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da so datumi, predvideni v zaključni strategiji, ciljni datumi, ne pa dokončni roki,
having regard to the fact that the dates envisaged in the completion strategy are target dates and not absolute deadlines,
ob upoštevanju šestmesečnih ocen in poročil, ki sta jih predložila predsednik in tožilec sodišča v skladu s 6. odstavkom resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov S/RES/1534(2004) o napredku, doseženem pri izvajanju zaključne strategije,
having regard to the six-monthly assessments submitted by the President and Prosecutor of the Tribunal, pursuant to paragraph 6 of UN Security Council resolution S/RES/1534 (2004), on the progress made towards implementation of the completion strategy,
ob upoštevanju velike in dosledne podpore Evropske unije in njenih držav članic sodišču in njegovemu delu,
having regard to the considerable and consistent support for the Tribunal and its work from the EU and its Member States,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je sodelovanje s sodiščem postalo osrednje merilo v politiki EU do držav zahodnega Balkana,
having regard to the fact that full cooperation with the Tribunal has become a central benchmark in the EU's policy towards the countries of the Western Balkans,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. januarja 2009 o Srebrenici Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0028 .
having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2009 on Srebrenica Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0028 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0112/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0112/2009 ),
ker sodišče v Haagu in njegovo delo zaslužita nadaljnjo polno podporo Evropske unije in njenih držav članic,
whereas the Tribunal, situated in The Hague, and its work deserve the continuing full support of the EU and its Member States,
ker je sodišče izrekalo sodbe, ki predstavljajo precedenčne primere glede genocida, vojnih zločinov in zločinov proti človeštvu, in ker je že veliko prispevalo k procesu sprave na zahodnem Balkanu ter k ponovni vzpostavitvi in ohranjanju miru v regiji,
whereas the Tribunal has delivered precedent-setting judgments on genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, and whereas it has already made a significant contribution to the process of reconciliation in the Western Balkans, thus contributing to the restoration and maintenance of peace in the region,
ker je bilo popolno sodelovanje s sodišče eden izmed strogih pogojev Evropske unije pri pogodbenih obveznostih, sklenjenih z državami v tej regiji,
whereas full cooperation with the Tribunal has been one of the strict conditions set by the EU in its contractual engagement with countries in the region,
ker je sodišče prispevalo k polaganju temeljev za nove norme reševanja sporov in pokonfliktnega razvoja po vsem svetu, ker je vzor morebitnim prihodnjim ad hoc sodiščem, ker je dokazalo, da je učinkovito in pregledno mednarodno sodstvo mogoče, in ker se široko priznava prispevek sodišča k razvoju mednarodnega kazenskega prava,
whereas the Tribunal has contributed to laying the foundations for new norms in conflict resolution and post-conflict development worldwide, has provided lessons for potential future ad hoc tribunals, and has shown that efficient and transparent international justice is possible, and whereas its contribution to the development of international criminal law is widely recognised,
ker so v različnih delih zahodnega Balkana in širše nekatere obtožnice, odločbe in sodbe sodišča veljale za kontroverzne, ker je mogoče iz teh reakcij pridobiti dragocene izkušnje, ki bodo postale del dediščine sodišča, tudi zato, ker poudarjajo potrebo po pritožbenem senatu ter po programu za ozaveščanje,
whereas some of the indictments, decisions and judgments issued by the Tribunal have been regarded as controversial in, and beyond, different parts of the Western Balkans; whereas valuable lessons can be learned from these reactions, which will form part of the legacy of the Tribunal, but whereas they also underscore the need for an Appeals Chamber as well as an outreach programme,
ker sodišče še naprej izvaja širok niz dejavnosti osveščanja, ki imajo za cilj približati delo sodišča zadevnim državam, vključno s spodbujanjem poročanja o sojenjih v lokalnih medijih, z neposrednim osveščanjem skupnosti, ki ga izvajajo uradniki sodišča na terenu, s prizadevanji za krepitev zmogljivosti nacionalnih sodnih institucij, ki obravnavajo vojne zločine, ter s številnimi projekti, ki imajo za cilj prepoznavanje najboljših praks,
whereas the Tribunal continues to conduct a wide range of outreach activities with the aim of bringing its work closer to the countries concerned, including facilitating the coverage of trials by the local media, direct community outreach by its officials on the ground and capacity-building efforts with national judicial institutions dealing with war crimes, as well as a number of projects that seek to identify best practices,
ker sta zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji Varnostnega sveta ZN S/RES/1503(2003) in S/RES/1534(2004) pozvali sodišče in Mednarodno kazensko sodišče za Ruando, naj končata vse preiskave do konca leta 2004, vse sodne obravnave prve stopnje do konca leta 2008, in vse delo do leta 2010; ker pa je sodišče navedlo, da ne bo uspelo zaključiti sodnih obravnav prve stopnje pred koncem leta 2009, tudi zaradi mnogih pritožb; ker je torej potreben nov sklep Varnostnega sveta ZN, ki bo podaljšal mandat sodišča,
whereas the above-mentioned UN Security Council resolutions S/RES/1503 (2003) and S/RES/1534 (2004) called on the Tribunal and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda to complete all investigations by the end of 2004, all first-instance trials by the end of 2008, and all work by 2010; whereas, however, the Tribunal has indicated that it will be unable to complete the first-instance trials before late 2009, also because of the great number of appeals; whereas, therefore, a new decision of the UN Security Council is needed in order to extend the mandate of the Tribunal,
ker je sodišče začelo s pobudo oblikovanja načrta, ki je dobil podporo Varnostnega sveta ZN v zgoraj navedenih resolucijah, ki je postal poznan kot "zaključna strategija" in katerega namen je zagotoviti, da se poslanstvo sodišča zaključi uspešno, pravočasno in usklajeno s pravnimi sistemi zadevnih držav,
whereas the Tribunal has taken the initiative of devising a plan which was endorsed by the UN Security Council in the above-mentioned resolutions and has become known as the "completion strategy", the purpose of which is to ensure that it concludes its mission successfully, in a timely way and in coordination with domestic legal systems in the countries concerned,