natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2003 o priporočilu Evropske centralne banke glede predloga sklepa Sveta o spremembi člena 10.2 Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke UL C 61 E, 10.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2003 on the recommendation of the European Central Bank for a proposal for a Council decision on an amendment to Article 10.2 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank OJ C 61 E, 10.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2003/223/ES z dne 21. marca 2003 o spremembi člena 10.2 Statuta Evropskega sistema centralnih bank in Evropske centralne banke UL L 83, 1.4.2003, str.
having regard to Council Decision 2003/223/EC of 21 March 2003 on an amendment to Article 10.2 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank OJ L 83, 1.4.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 140(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C7-0131/2010 ),
having regard to Article 140(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0131/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0182/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0182/2010 ),
ker člen 140(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) opredeljuje doseganje visoke stopnje trajnostne konvergence, pri čemer se upošteva, kako države članice izpolnjujejo naslednja merila: doseganje visoke stopnje stabilnosti cen, vzdržnost stanja javnih financ, upoštevanje normalnih meja nihanja, predvidenih z mehanizmom deviznega tečaja, ter trajnost dosežene konvergence in sodelovanja države članice v mehanizmu deviznega tečaja evropskega monetarnega sistema, kar se kaže v stopnji dolgoročnih obrestnih mer;
whereas Article 140(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) defines the achievement of a high degree of sustainable convergence by reference to the fulfilment by each Member State of the following criteria: the achievement of a high degree of price stability; the sustainability of the government's financial position; the observance of the normal fluctuation margins provided for by the exchange rate mechanism; and the durability of convergence achieved by the Member State and of its participation in the exchange-rate mechanism of the European Monetary System being reflected in the long-term interest-rate levels,
ker Estonija izpolnjuje maastrichtska merila v skladu s členom 140(1) PDEU in Protokolom (št. 13) o konvergenčnih merilih, ki je priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji in PDEU,
whereas Estonia has complied with the Maastricht criteria in accordance with Article 140(1) TFEU and the Protocol (No 13) on the convergence criteria annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the TFEU,
ker je poročevalec obiskal Estonijo, da bi ocenil njeno pripravljenost za vstop v euroobmočje,
whereas the Rapporteur visited Estonia to assess the readiness of that country to enter the euro area,
ker je Komisija izjavila, da je Eurostat ob tesnem sodelovanju z estonskim statističnim uradom pregledal kakovost vseh zadevnih podatkov, ki so jih posredovali estonski organi,
whereas the Commission has stated that EUROSTAT, in close cooperation with the Estonian statistical office has examined the quality of all relevant data transmitted by the Estonian authorities,
podpira uvedbo eura v Estoniji 1. januarja 2011;
Favours the adoption of the euro by Estonia on 1 January 2011;
ugotavlja, da je bila ocena Komisije in Evropske centralne banke pripravljena v razmerah globalne finančne, gospodarske in družbene krize, ki je vplivala na možnosti številnih drugih držav članic za doseganje nominalne konvergence;
Notes that the assessment of the Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) has taken place against the background of the global financial, economic and social crisis which has affected the prospects for nominal convergence of many other Member States;
ugotavlja, da Estonija izpolnjuje merila, kar je rezultat odločnih, verodostojnih in nenehnih prizadevanj estonske vlade in Estoncev;
Notes that Estonia has fulfilled the criteria, as a result of determined, credible and sustained efforts by the Estonian Government and the Estonian people;
je zaskrbljen zaradi neskladij med konvergenčnima poročiloma Komisije in Evropske centralne banke v zvezi z vzdržno stabilnostjo cen;
Shows concern regarding the discrepancies between the convergence reports of the Commission and the ECB as regards the sustainability of price stability;
ugotavlja, da Evropska centralna banka v konvergenčnem poročilu za leto 2010 navaja, da bo po koncu sedanjega gospodarskega prilagajanja ohranjanje konvergence inflacije velik izziv;
Notes that the ECB's 2010 Convergence Report identifies the maintenance of inflation convergence, once the current economic adjustment is over, as very challenging;
poziva estonsko vlado, naj ohrani previdnost v davčni politiki ter splošno usmerjenost v stabilnost na drugih področjih politike ob upoštevanju tveganj za makroekonomska neravnovesja in stabilnost cen v prihodnosti;
Calls on the Estonian Government to maintain its prudent fiscal policy stance, together with its overall stability-oriented policies, in the face of future macroeconomic imbalances and price stability risks;
poziva države članice, naj Komisiji omogočijo ocenjevanje izpolnjevanja maastrichtskih meril na podlagi natančnih, neodvisnih, aktualnih, zanesljivih in visokokakovostnih podatkov;
Calls on the Member States to allow the Commission to assess compliance with the Maastricht criteria on the basis of definite, independent, current, reliable, and high-quality data;
poziva Komisijo, naj simulira učinek paketa pomoči euroobmočja na estonski proračun, ko se bo država pridružila temu območju in tako postala članica skupine, ki bo zagotavljala sklad za pomoč;
Asks the Commission to simulate the effect of the euro area rescue package on the Estonian budget when the country joins the euro area and thus becomes a member of the group guaranteeing the rescue funds;
poziva Komisijo in Evropsko centralno banko, naj pri predlaganju končnega deviznega tečaja za estonsko krono upoštevata vse vidike;
Calls on the Commission and the ECB to consider all aspects when recommending the final exchange rate for the Estonian kroon;
poziva estonske oblasti, naj pospešijo praktične priprave za zagotovitev nemotenega postopka prehoda; poziva estonsko vlado, naj zagotovi, da se uvedba eura ne uporablja za skrita zvišanja cen;
Calls on the Estonian authorities to speed up their practical preparations to ensure a smooth changeover process; calls on the Estonian Government to ensure that the introduction of the euro is not used for hidden price increases;
poziva Komisijo in Evropsko centralno banko, naj Parlamentu poročata o predvidenih ukrepih, s katerimi bi kar najbolj zmanjšali inflacijo sredstev kot posledico nizkih obrestnih mer;
Calls on the Commission and the ECB to report to Parliament on steps being considered to minimise asset inflation as a consequence of low interest rates;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to stališče posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Evropski centralni banki, euroskupini in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, the European Central Bank, the Eurogroup and the governments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 16. junija 2010 o stališču Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010 Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, Oddelek III – Komisija (10930/2010 – C7-0153/2010 – 2010/2056(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 16 June 2010 on Council's position on Draft amending budget No 4/2010 of the European Union for the financial year 2010, Section III – Commission (10930/2010 – C7-0153/2010 – 2010/2056(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju členov 310 in 314 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in člena 106a Pogodbe o Euratomu,
having regard to Articles 310 and 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty,
, zlasti členov 15(3), 37 in 38,
(’the Financial Regulation’), and particularly Article 15(3) and Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010, ki je bil dokončno sprejet 17. decembra 2009 UL L 64, 12.3.2010.
having regard to the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, as finally adopted on 17 December 2009 OJ L 64, 12.3.2010.
ob upoštevanju predhodnega predloga spremembe proračuna št. 4 za splošni proračun 2010, ki ga je Komisija predložila 16. aprila 2010 ( KOM(2010)0169 ),
having regard to Draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget 2010, which the Commission presented on 16 April 2010 ( COM(2010)0169 ),
ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, ki ga je Svet pripravil dne 11. junija 2010 (10930/2010 – C7-0153/2010 ),
having regard to Council's position on Draft amending budget No 4/2010 established on 11 June 2010 (10930/2010 - C7-0153/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 75b in 75e svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 75b and 75e of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0200/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0200/2010 ),
ker je namen predloga spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, da se v proračun za leto 2010 vključi presežek iz proračunskega leta 2009, ki znaša 2.253.591.199,37 EUR,
whereas Draft amending budget No 4/2010 aims to enter in the 2010 budget the surplus of the 2009 financial year, amounting to EUR 2 253 591 199,37,
ker je presežek nastal predvsem zaradi vknjižbe previsokih prihodkov v višini 400.703.258 EUR, neporabljenih odobrenih sredstev za odhodke v višini 1.667.346.181 EUR in pozitivnega salda zaradi tečajnih razlik v znesku 185.541.760 EUR,
whereas the main components of this surplus are an over-registering in revenue of EUR 400 703 258, an under-spending in expenditure of EUR 1 667 346 181 and positive exchange rate differences for EUR 185 541 760,
ker so neporabljena sredstva za plačila v letu 2009 v razdelku 1 znašala 451 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 2 so bila 244 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 3 so znašala 106 milijonov EUR, v razdelku 4 so bila 603 milijone EUR, v razdelku 5 pa 263 milijonov EUR,
whereas for heading 1 the under-spending of payment appropriations in 2009 amounted to EUR 451 million, for heading 2 to EUR 244 million, for heading 3 to EUR 106 million, for heading 4 to EUR 603 million and for heading 5 to EUR 263 million,
ker bo skupni učinek zelo majhnih razlik do proračunske zgornje meje in vse večjih potreb po finančnih sredstvih ogrozil obstoječe politične prednostne naloge, precejšnja neporabljena sredstva pa hkrati ovirajo izvajanje politik EU,
whereas the combined effect of the very tight budgetary margins and emerging financial needs is to put at risk existing political priorities, while significant under-spending reduces at the same time the delivery of EU policies,
ker je pri izračunu neporabljenih sredstev v proračunu za leto 2009 treba upoštevati oba predloga sprememb proračuna, št. 4/2010 inspremembo proračuna št. 10/2009,
whereas the calculation of 2009 budgetary under-implementation should take account of both Draft amending budget No 4/2010 and Amending budget 10/2009,
je seznanjen s predlogom spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, ki je namenjena izključno vnosu presežka iz leta 2009 v proračun v skladu s členom 15 finančne uredbe;
Takes note of Draft amending budget No 4/2010 devoted solely to the budgeting of the 2009 surplus, in accordance with Article 15 of the Financial Regulation;
poudarja, da so trenutna neporabljena sredstva zaradi nezadostnega izvrševanja proračuna 2009 večja kot presežek, predstavljen v predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010, saj znašajo več kot 5.000.000.000 EUR, če upoštevamo tudi spremembo proračuna št. 10/2009; zato opozarja, da spremembe proračuna ob koncu leta, ki zmanjšujejo raven plačil, hkrati pa ustrezno zmanjšajo celotne proračunske prispevke držav članic za financiranje proračuna EU, podajajo izkrivljeno sliko proračunskega izvrševanja;
Stresses that the actual under-implementation of the 2009 budget is not limited to the surplus presented in Draft amending budget No 4/2010 but amounts to more than EUR 5 000 000 000, taking also into account Amending budget No 10/2009; warns therefore that the year-end Amending budgets reducing the level of payment appropriations, while diminishing accordingly the global contribution of the Member States to the financing of the EU budget, give a distorted picture of budgetary implementation;
odobrava stališče Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 4/2010 brez predlogov sprememb in naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj razglasi, da je bila sprememba proračuna št. 2/2010 dokončno sprejeta, ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Approves Council's position on Draft amending budget No 4/2010 unamended and instructs its President to declare that Amending budget No 2/2010 has been definitively adopted and arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Sprejeta besedila, 19.5.2010, P7_TA(2010)0180 .
Texts adopted, 19.5.2010, P7_TA(2010)0180 .
ob upoštevanju končnih letnih računovodskih izkazov Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2008 – zvezek I ( C7–0174/2009 ) UL C 273, 13.11.2009, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2008 – Volume I ( C7-0174/2009 ) OJ C 273, 13.11.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2008 z odgovori institucij UL C 269, 10.11.2009, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2008, together with the institutions’ replies OJ C 269, 10.11.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2009 s pripombami, ki so sestavni del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, oddelek II – Svet UL L 19, 23.1.2010, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2009 with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2007, Section II – Council OJ L 19, 23.1.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7–0096/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0096/2010 ),
ker je Svet, ki ga predstavlja špansko predsedstvo, privolil v ponovno oceno domnevnega prijateljskega sporazuma, ki je nastal leta 1970,
whereas the Council, represented by the Spanish Presidency, has agreed to reassess the alleged Gentlemen's Agreement dating back to 1970,
ker ’imajo državljani pravico vedeti, kako se porabijo njihovi davki in kako se izvajajo pristojnosti, ki so zaupane političnim organom’ Pobuda za preglednost v Evropi
whereas ’citizens have the right to know how their taxes are being spent and how the power entrusted to political bodies is handled’ The European Transparency Initiative.
ker je bilo v sklepih Evropskega sveta iz Kölna 3. in 4. junija 1999 predvideno, da se Svetu dodelijo operativne zmogljivosti na področju okrepljene skupne evropske varnostne in obrambne politike (SEVOP),
whereas the conclusions of the European Council of Cologne of 3 and 4 June 1999 envisage giving operational capacities to the Council in the field of a strengthened common European security and defence policy (CESDP),
z dne 23. februarja 2004 vzpostavljen mehanizem ATHENA za upravljanje financiranja skupnih stroškov operacij Evropske unije, ki so vojaškega ali obrambnega pomena, in ker ta sklep skupaj s Sklepom 2004/582/ES predstavnikov vlad držav članic z zasedanja Sveta 28. aprila 2004 o privilegijih in imuniteti, zagotovljenih mehanizmu ATHENA UL L 261, 6.8.2004, str.
of 23 February 2004 established a mechanism for administering the financing of the common costs of EU operations having military or defence implications, called ATHENA, and whereas that Decision, together with the Decision 2004/582/EC of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council of 28 April 2004 concerning privileges and immunities granted to ATHENA OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p.
, slednjemu dodeljuje privilegije in imunitete, Svetu pa daje operativna pooblastila,
, grants privileges and immunities to ATHENA and gives operational power to the Council,
ker Sklep Sveta 2000/178/SZVP z dne 28. februarja 2000 o pravilih za nacionalne strokovnjake na vojaškem področju, dodeljene generalnemu sekretariatu Sveta, v začasnem obdobju UL L 57, 2.3.2000, str.
whereas Council Decision 2000/178/CFSP of 28 February 2000 on the rules applicable to national experts in the military field on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council during the interim period OJ L 57, 2.3.2000, p.
določata, da odhodki, ki nastanejo ob napotitvi vojaških strokovnjakov iz držav članic, bremenijo proračun Sveta,
specify that expenditure arising from the secondment of military experts is to be charged to the Council budget,
ugotavlja, da je imel Svet leta 2008 na voljo sredstva za prevzem obveznosti v višini 743 000 000 EUR (2007: 650 000 000 EUR), s stopnjo izkoriščenosti 93,31 %, ki je precej višja kot v letu 2007 (81,89 %), vendar še vedno pod povprečjem drugih institucij (95,67 %);
Notes that in 2008 the Council had available commitment appropriations amounting to a total of EUR 743 million (2007: EUR 650 million), with a utilisation rate of 93,31 %, considerably higher than in 2007 (81,89 %), but still below the average of the other institutions (95,67 %);
glede na težave, ki so se pojavile v postopkih podelitve razrešnice za leti 2007 in 2008, znova potrjuje svoje stališče iz resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2002 o podelitvi razrešnice za proračunsko leto 2000 UL L 158, 17.6.2002, str.
In view of the problems encountered in the 2007 and 2008 discharge procedures, reaffirms its position taken in its decision of 25 April 2002 on discharge in respect of the financial year 2000 OJ L 158, 17.6.2002, p.
meni, da bi bilo treba glede na povečanje upravnih odhodkov, zlasti glede na to, da se bodo verjetno pojavili odhodki operativne narave, odhodke Sveta pregledati na enak način kot odhodke drugih institucij EU, torej v okviru postopka za podelitev razrešnice v skladu s členom 319 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Considers that in view of the increases in administrative expenditure and especially due to the possible presence of expenditure of an operational nature, the expenditure of the Council ought to be scrutinised in the same way as that of the other EU institutions as part of the discharge procedure provided for by Article 319 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
Meni, da bi moral ta pregled temeljiti na naslednjih pisnih dokumentih, ki so jih predložile vse institucije:
Considers that such scrutiny is based on the following written documents submitted by all institutions:
poročilo o izvrševanju proračuna za predhodno proračunsko leto,
accounts of the preceding financial year relating to the implementation of the budget,
izkaz stanja sredstev in obveznosti,
a financial statement of the assets and liabilities,
letno poročilo o dejavnosti glede njihovega proračuna in finančnega upravljanja,
annual activity report on their budget and financial management,
letno poročilo notranjega revizorja,
annual report of the internal auditor,
kot tudi na ustni predstavitvi, ki poteka na seji odbora, pristojnega za postopek razrešnice;
as well as an oral presentation given in the meeting of the Committee responsible for the discharge procedure;
pričakuje, da bodo v prihodnje med razpravo o razrešnici na plenarnem zasedanju prisotne vse institucije in bodo zastopane na ustrezni ravni;
Expects the future presence of all institutions, represented at appropriate level, during the plenary debate on discharge;
zavrača mnenje Sveta, da je dejstvo, da Parlament in Svet v preteklosti nista pregledovala izvrševanja svojih oddelkov proračuna, rezultat prijateljskega sporazuma (resolucija, zabeležena v zapisniku seje Sveta z dne 22. aprila 1970); meni, da prijateljski sporazum ni zavezujoč dokument in mu Svet pripisuje prevelik pomen;
Rejects the Council's suggestion that the fact that Parliament and the Council have not, in the past, scrutinised the implementation of their respective sections of the budget was the result of a ’Gentlemen's agreement’ (Resolution recorded in the minutes of the Council meeting of 22 April 1970); considers the Gentlemen's Agreement not to be a binding document, and the interpretation attributed to it by the Council to be exceedingly wide;
meni, da sta priprava proračuna in podelitev razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna dva ločena postopka ter da prijateljski sporazum med Svetom in Parlamentom glede priprave njunih oddelkov proračuna ne sme razbremeniti Sveta odgovornosti, da mora v celoti odgovarjati javnosti za sredstva, ki so mu dana na razpolago;
Believes that the preparation of the budget and the discharge of the budget are two separate procedures and that the Gentlemen's Agreement between Parliament and the Council over the preparation of their respective sections of the budget must not absolve the Council of its responsibility to be fully accountable to the public for the funds placed at its disposal;
meni, da postopek razrešnice za leto 2008 poteka v odločilnem trenutku, ko je treba sprejeti jasen uradni dogovor o postopku razrešnice za novo Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje (EEAS), da bi s popolno preglednostjo zagotovili verodostojnost; zato poziva Svet, naj pred zaključkom postopka razrešnice za leto 2008 zagotovi, da se Parlamentu predložijo konkretni, natančni in vseobsegajoči načrti za kadrovsko, organizacijsko in nadzorno strukturo EEAS, vključno z vojaškim osebjem EU, centrom za spremljanje razmer, Direktoratom Generalnega sekretarja Sveta za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje, civilnimi zmogljivostmi za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, ter vsem osebjem Generalnega sekretariata, ki se ukvarja z zunanjo in varnostno politiko, iz katerih je razvidno zlasti povečanje in dodeljevanje osebja ter zagotovljena proračunska sredstva; poleg tega poziva Svet, da se nemudoma vključi v pogajanja s proračunskim organom na podlagi predloženih predlogov;
Believes that the 2008 discharge takes place at a crucial time, when a formal agreement on the discharge process for the new European External Action Service (EEAS) must be set out clearly to ensure credibility through full transparency, and calls on Council to ensure that it submits to Parliament, before the end of the 2008 discharge procedure, concrete, detailed and all-encompassing plans for the staffing, organisational and control structures of the EEAS, including EU military staff, the Situation Centre, the GSC´s Crisis Management and Planning Directorate, the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability, as well as all staff in the General Secretariat working on Foreign and Security Policy, showing in particular the increase and allocation of staff and the budgetary implications provided for and to immediately take part in the negotiations with the budgetary authority on the basis of the proposals submitted;
poudarja, da dejstvo, da je bila razrešnica letos podeljena, še ni nobeno zagotovilo, da bo podeljena tudi v prihodnjih letih, če Svet ne bo dosegel občutnega napredka na spornih področjih, omenjenih v odstavku 5 resolucije Parlamenta z dne 25. novembra 2009;
Stresses that this year's granting of discharge cannot be taken into account for granting of discharge in the years to come unless the Council makes considerable progress in the areas of concern referred to in paragraph 5 of Parliament's resolution of 25 November 2009;
ponavlja, da bi Svet moral vsako leto biti prisoten na Parlamentu med predstavitvijo letnega poročila Računskega sodišča in razpravo o podelitvi razrešnice za izvrševanje proračuna;
Reiterates that Council should be present at the Parliament for the presentation of the Court of Auditors’ Annual Report and for the budget discharge debate each year;