natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja namen, da se zmanjša nepotrebno breme na MSP in da se poveča uporaba informacijske tehnologije; meni, da bi eden izmed ciljev poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja Unije moral biti ta, da postane zakonodaja bolj enostavna, učinkovitejša in bolj osredotočena na uporabnika;
Welcomes the intention to reduce the unnecessary burden on SMEs and to reinforce the use of information technology; considers that one of the objectives of simplifying the Union's regulatory environment should be to make legislation simpler and more effective, and thus more "user-oriented";
meni, da postopek poenostavitve ne sme pod nobenim pogojem pomeniti zniževanje meril, ki jih določa veljavna zakonodaja; zato svari pred preozko in zgolj finančno ter upravno analizo stroškov in koristi zadevne zakonodaje; je prepričan, da mora vsaka ocena poenostavitve v enaki meri upoštevati ekonomske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike ter se ne sme omejiti na kratkoročno presojo;
Considers that the simplification process should in no circumstances entail lowering the standards set by current legislation; warns, for example, against an excessively narrow and exclusively financial and administrative analysis of the costs and benefits of the legislation concerned; is convinced that any assessment with a view to simplification must take account equally of economic, social, environmental and health aspects, and should not restrict itself to short-term considerations;
poziva Komisijo, naj da prednost poenostavitvi predpisov; meni, da bi direktive bilo treba poenostaviti samo v izjemnih in primerno utemeljenih primerih, ko ne obravnavajo zelo občutljivih zadev ali ko niso plod težko doseženih kompromisov, kakor je to v primeru prava družb ES;
Invites the Commission to give priority to the simplification of regulations; considers that directives should be simplified only in exceptional and duly justified cases, when they are not dealing with very sensitive matters or are not the result of difficult compromises, as in the case of EC company law;
ugotavlja, da je "uspeh" pobud za poenostavitev, ki prihajajo in se uresničujejo od leta 2003, zadovoljiv, in da povprečno trajanje postopkov kljub zapletenosti vsebine ni predolgo; vendar opaža, da je bilo število pobud za poenostavitev, vloženih od omenjenega datuma naprej, zelo omejeno, in da v začetku zastavljeni cilji zmanjšanja obsega pravnega reda Skupnosti še zdaleč niso doseženi;
Notes that the success rate of the simplification initiatives undertaken since 2003 is not disappointing and that the average length of procedures is not excessive given the complexity of the subject-matter; observes, nevertheless, that the number of simplification initiatives launched since that date has been very limited and that the targets originally set for reducing the volume of the Community acquis are far from being achieved;
meni, da je razveljavitev nepomembnih in zastarelih aktov prednostna naloga, ki bi jo morala Komisija izvesti brez odlašanja; vendar bi morala v takšnih primerih razveljavitev zakonodaje Skupnosti spremljati sprejetje zakonodajnega akta Skupnosti, da bi preprečili državam članicam urejanje področij, ki so bila deregulirana na ravni Skupnosti;
Takes the view that the repeal of irrelevant and obsolete acts is a priority requirement with which the Commission must comply without delay; considers, however, that when Community legislation is repealed on those grounds, a Community act must be put in place at the same time to prevent Member States from regulating matters that have been deregulated at Community level;
poudarja, da je v primeru "prestroge predpisane ureditve" na nekem področju to v veliki meri posledica zakonodajne dejavnosti držav članic, in da bi morala zato razveljavitvi predpisov Skupnosti, če do nje pride, slediti razveljavitev ustreznih nacionalnih določb;
Points out that, while there may be over-regulation in some areas, this state of affairs is due in large measure to the lawmaking activity of the Member States and that, therefore, if Community legislation is to be repealed, this must be followed by repeal of the corresponding national provisions;
predlaga, da Komisija stalno spremlja takšne nacionalne predpise, ki naj bi ostali v veljavi po razveljavitvi izvorne zakonodaje Skupnosti; meni, da bi morala Komisija svojim predlogom dodati ustrezne revizijske klavzule;
Proposes that the Commission constantly monitor such national legislation as might remain in force after the Community legislation that gave rise to it has been repealed; considers that the Commission should add appropriate review clauses to its proposals;
meni, da sta kodifikacija in preoblikovanje najpomembnejša instrumenta za poenostavitev pravega reda Skupnosti in poziva k čim širši uporabi teh instrumentov; meni, da je bilo preoblikovanje uporabljeno v omejenem obsegu, kar je posledica tako pomanjkanja zanimanja s strani Komisije, kakor tudi neprilagojenosti Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta Medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu, ki ureja ta poslovnik;
Considers codification and recasting to be the primary means of simplifying the acquis communautaire and urges that they be used more widely; believes that recasting has been used only to a limited extent and that this is due to both lack of interest on the part of the Commission and a failure to gear the European Parliament's Rules of Procedure closely enough to the Interinstitutional Agreement on recasting;
podpira kodifikacijo prava Skupnosti, vendar je skeptičen glede njegovega popolnega preoblikovanja, saj to med institucijami EU lahko privede do različnih razlag; opozarja, da poenostavitev ne bi smela voditi k ponovnem ustvarjanju prava Skupnosti zunaj demokratičnega nadzora;
Supports the codification of the acquis communitaire but is sceptical about its total recasting, as this may well lead to diverging interpretations among the EU institutions; warns that simplification should not lead to a re-writing of the acquis outside democratic control;
čestita za dosedanje rezultate, dosežene s kodifikacijo zakonodaje Skupnosti in upa, da bodo pristojne službe Komisije oblikovale nove in ambicioznejše predloge za kodifikacijo tudi na področjih, različnih od tistih, ki so bila pokrita do sedaj, zlasti na področju prava družb, intelektualne lastnine in varstva potrošnikov;
Applauds the results achieved so far through codification of Community legislation and hopes that the Commission units concerned will draw up new, and more ambitious, codification proposals extending also to sectors other than those covered to date, in particular company law, intellectual property, and consumer protection;
meni, da je treba Medinstitucionalni sporazum o preoblikovanju bolj dosledno izvajati, če institucije dejansko nameravajo poenostaviti zakonodajo in uporabiti za ta cilj preoblikovanje;
Considers that if the institutions genuinely wish to simplify legislation and employ recasting to that end, the Interinstitutional Agreement on recasting should be applied more rigorously;
razume, da Evropski parlament in Svet načeloma ne bosta smela vlagati predlogov sprememb kodificiranih delov, če se želi zagotoviti učinkovitost preoblikovanja; meni, da če institucije dejansko želijo poenostaviti zakonodajo in za ta namen uporabiti preoblikovanje, bi morali biti deli kodificiranega besedila praviloma v skladu z določbami Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o kodifikaciji; vendar priznava, da bi moral obstajati izreden postopek za vlaganje predlogov sprememb h kodificiranemu delu, kadar je to potrebno za skladnost ali povezanost z delom, ki je predmet spreminjanja;
Understands that, if the intention is to make recasting effective, the European Parliament and the Council will, as a matter of principle, have to refrain from amending the codified parts of acts; believes that, if the institutions genuinely wish to simplify legislation and employ recasting to that end, the codified parts of an act should, as a rule, be subject to the provisions laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement on codification; recognises, however, that there should be a special procedure to enable the codified part to be amended whenever this is essential in order to make it consistent with, or to link it to, the part that can be altered;
meni, da lahko institucije ocenijo možnost določitve tretje kategorije ukrepov poleg ukrepov kodifikacije in preoblikovanja, da bi tako predvideli najustreznejša sredstva za poenostavitev pravnih aktov Skupnosti; vendar meni, da do takrat, v primerih, ko bi Komisija pripravila splošne predloge za poenostavitev, ki ne bi bile spadali med razveljavitve, kodifikacije ali preoblikovanja, bi moral Evropski parlament postopati v skladu z že veljavnimi postopki; v teh primerih torej ne bi bilo mogoče izvajati točke 36 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje;
Considers that the institutions might usefully determine whether a third type of operation might be provided for, alongside codification and recasting, so as to afford the most appropriate means of simplifying Community legal acts; considers, however, that to date, in those cases in which the Commission has drawn up generic simplification proposals which cannot be classified as involving repeal, codification or recasting, the European Parliament cannot embark on any procedure other than the customary one and that therefore, in such cases, point 36 of the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making cannot be applied;
meni, da bi moral Medinstitucionalni sporazum o preoblikovanju jasno določiti postopek, ki bi se uporabljal v primeru, da bi bilo med zakonodajnim postopkom potrebno spremeniti kodificirane dele;
Considers that the Interinstitutional Agreement on recasting should spell out the procedure to follow in cases where, during a legislative procedure, it proves necessary to alter the codified parts of the act;
poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenih smernic nemudoma predstavi predlog za preoblikovanje medinstitucionalnih sporazumov, ki urejajo kakovost zakonodaje Unije;
Calls on the Commission, taking into account the guidelines set out above, to submit a proposal without delay with a view to recasting the interinstitutional agreements governing the quality of Union legislation;
kaže pripravljenost, da več prispeva k naporom, ki jih morajo skupaj vložiti vse tri institucije, če naj ponovno steče proces poenostavitve;
Is ready to make a larger contribution to the work that needs to be done jointly by the three institutions to relaunch the simplification process;
se zavezuje, da bo razmislil o izboljšanju svojih postopkov in notranjih zakonodajnih tehnik, da bi s tem pospešil proces poenostavitve, vendar ob spoštovanju postopkov, ki jih predvideva primarno pravo, predvsem Pogodba o ES;
Undertakes for its part to give thought to the improvement of its procedures and its internal legislative techniques in order to speed up the simplification dossiers, while complying with the procedures laid down in primary law, in this particular case the EC Treaty;
naroča Odboru za ustavne zadeve, naj oceni možnost ustreznih sprememb Poslovnika, da bi omogočili učinkovitejše izvajanje Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o preoblikovanju tudi z vidika večje uporabe poenostavljenih postopkov, določenih v Poslovniku;
Instructs the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to determine what amendments might be made to the Rules of Procedure to enable the agreement on recasting to be effectively implemented, not least with a view to making greater use of the simplified procedures laid down in the Rules of Procedure;
poudarja, da morajo biti tradicionalni zakonodajni instrumenti še dalje splošno pravilo za doseganje političnih ciljev, določenih s pogodbami; meni, da je uporaba alternativnih regulativnih metod, kot sta koregulacija in samoregulacija, lahko koristna dopolnitev zakonodajnim ukrepom, ko lahko le-te prispevajo k enakovrednemu ali večjemu izboljšanju od tistega, ki ga je možno doseči prek zakonodaje; poudarja, da mora biti vsaka uporaba alternativnih regulativnih metod skladna z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom o boljši pripravi zakonodaje; opozarja, da bi morala Komisija opredeliti pogoje in omejitve, ki jih morajo strani spoštovati pri izvajanju teh praks, ter bi bilo treba te prakse v vsakem primeru uporabiti pod nadzorom Komisije in brez poseganja v pravico Parlamenta do nasprotovanja uporabi le-teh;
Emphasises the fact that traditional legislative instruments must continue to be used as a general rule to attain the objectives laid down in the Treaties; takes the view that the use of alternative regulatory methods such as co-regulation and self-regulation could usefully supplement legislative measures where these methods make improvements of equivalent or broader scope than legislation can provide; stresses that any use of alternative regulatory methods must comply with the interinstitutional agreement on "better law-making"; points out that the Commission has to lay down the conditions and limits which the parties must observe when employing such regulatory methods, and that these should in any event be used under Commission supervision and without prejudice to Parliament's right to object to their use;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o oceni, ali trenutna praksa standardizacije kot oblike koregulacije ustreza določilom Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje in člena 6 Pogodbe ES;
Asks the Commission to present a report assessing whether the current practice of standardisation as a form of co-regulation meets the requirements of the Inter-Institutional agreement on better law-making and Article 6 of the EC Treaty;
meni, da obstaja nevarnost, da bo standardizacija zaradi izključitve izvoljenih predstavnikov iz odločanja in zaradi neenakih pravic udeležbe nevladnih organizacij in drugih zainteresiranih strani privedla do slabše preglednosti in odgovornosti; zato meni, da bi morala biti standardizacija omejena le na izključno tehnične harmonizacijske ukrepe;
Takes the view that standardisation could lead to less transparency and accountability, since the elected representatives would not be involved in decision making, and participation of non-governmental organisations and other interested parties would not be guaranteed in the same way; takes the view, therefore, that standardisation should be strictly limited to harmonising measures of a purely technical nature;
izraža presenečenje nad tem, da je bilo v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije iz leta 2005 vprašanje reforme sedanjega sistema prenašanja zakonodajne funkcije (sistema komitologije) sproženo le na kratko in naključno - proti koncu točke 3.d - glede na to, da bi takšna reforma lahko veliko prispevala k poenostavitvi sekundarnega prava Skupnosti in omogočila Komisiji, da po hitrejših postopkih sprejme izvedbene ukrepe;
Is surprised that the issue of reforming the current system of delegating rule-making ("comitology") receives only a brief mention in passing – towards the end of point 3.d – in the above-mentioned Commission communication of 2005, even though such a reform could make a major contribution to simplifying secondary Community law by allowing the Commission to adopt implementing provisions using faster procedures;
meni, da zakonodajno telo lahko prispeva k poenostavitvi z dogovarjanjem o manj izčrpnih zakonodajnih aktih in z večjo uporabo izvedbenih ukrepov s strani Komisije, ob zagotovilu, da ima zakonodajalec učinkovit nadzor nad vsebino teh izvedbenih ukrepov;
Is of the opinion that the legislature could also contribute to simplification through agreement on less detailed legal acts and the use of a wider range of implementing measures by the Commission, provided that effective control by the legislature as to the substance of those implementing measures is guaranteed;
ponovno poudarja, da vsaka uporaba postopka "komitologije" zahteva celotni ponovni pregled Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
Reaffirms in this context that any recourse to the "comitology" procedure would necessitate a complete revision of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
, da se zagotovi:
, in order to:
večja odprtost,
guarantee greater openness,
da je vsaka podelitev izvršne moči Komisiji omejena na nebistvene ali izvršilne ukrepe in je podrejena jasni opredelitvi cilja, vsebine, dometa in trajanja prenosa oblasti, vključno, če je potrebno, s "klavzulami o zapadlosti",
ensure that any conferral of implementing powers on the Commission was limited to non-essential or implementing measures and was conditional upon a clear definition of the objective, content, scope and duration of the delegation of powers, including, where appropriate, "sunset clauses",
vzpostavitev formalne enakosti med pooblastili Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta pri skrbnem pregledu teh ukrepov z uvedbo ustreznih mehanizmov opozarjanja;
guarantee the introduction of formal equality between the powers of the European Parliament and those of the Council in considering these measures, through the introduction of call-back procedures;
se seznanja s seznamom ukrepov, ki jih vsebuje tekoči program poenostavitve Komisije in bo dejavno sodeloval pri doseganju cilja poenostavitve teh zakonodajnih aktov, če bo to potrebno, v okviru prihodnjega zakonodajnega postopka;
Takes note of the list of actions contained in the Commission simplification rolling programme and will actively cooperate in the achievement of the objective of simplifying pieces of legislation, if appropriate, in the context of the forthcoming legislative process;
pričakuje, da bodo različni predlogi Komisije za preoblikovanje in pregled prispevali k izboljšanju ravni gospodarske in socialne razvitosti Unije v povezavi s politiko trajnostnega razvoja, kakor tudi k izboljšanju ravni varovanja zdravja državljanov in kakovosti njihovega okolja, v skladu cilji iz člena 2 Pogodbe ES;
Expects that the various recasting and review proposals emanating from the Commission will contribute to improving the Union's level of economic and social development in the context of the sustainable development policy, as well as the level of citizens" health protection and the quality of their environment, in conformity with the objectives laid down in Article 2 of the EC Treaty;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izidu pregleda zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca ( 2005/2214(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator ( 2005/2214(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 27. septembra 2005 Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o izidu pregleda zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca ( KOM(2005)0462 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 27 September 2005 to the Council and the European Parliament on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator ( COM(2005)0462 ),
ob upoštevanju pisma svojega predsednika z dne 23. januarja 2006 Ref.
having regard to the letter from its President to the President of the Commission dated 23 January 2006 Ref.
Pres-A-Courrier D(2006)300689.
Pres-A-Courrier D(2006)300689).
ob upoštevanju pisma predsednika Evropske komisije predsedniku Parlamenta z dne 8. marca 2006,
having regard to the letter from the President of the Commission to the President of the Parliament dated 8 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0143/2006 ), ob upoštevanju naslednjega:
having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0143/2006 ), whereas
ker je Komisija v svojem zgoraj navedenem sporočilu napovedala, da namerava umakniti 68 predlogov, za katere ocenjuje, da niso skladni s cilji Lizbonske strategije ter načeli bolje oblikovanih predpisov, in da bodo drugi predlogi na podlagi ponovno opravljene presoje gospodarskega vpliva po potrebi spremenjeni,
in its above-mentioned communication, the Commission announced its intention to withdraw 68 proposals that it considers inconsistent with the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy and the principles of better regulation, while others will be subject to a reviewed economic impact assessment and, if appropriate, modified,
ker predsednik Parlamenta v pismu, ki ga je poslal predsedniku Komisije po analizi tega sporočila v parlamentarnih odborih, na splošno pozdravlja namere Komisije, hkrati pa jo izrecno prosi, naj ne umakne nekaterih predlogov, in ker nasprotuje spremembi nekaterih drugih predlogov,
the letter sent by the President of the Parliament to the President of the Commission at the outcome of the analysis of that communication by the parliamentary committees generally welcomes the intentions of the Commission, but specifically asks it not to withdraw several of those proposals and objects to the possible modification of some other proposals,
predsednik Komisije je v odgovoru predsedniku Parlamenta navedel, da je Komisija, preden je sprejela svoje dokončno stališče, ustrezno preučila stališče Parlamenta; podal je podrobne razloge, zakaj Komisija ni upoštevala nekaterih zahtev Parlamenta in navedel možne pobude, ki jih kot odziv na te zahteve v prihodnosti namerava podati Komisija,
the reply sent by the President of the Commission to the President of the Parliament states that the Commission took into due consideration the position of Parliament before adopting its final position and indicates the specific reasons why the Commission did not follow some of the requests of Parliament, as well as the possible initiatives that the Commission plans to undertake, in the future, to address some of those requests,
ker je to sporočilo idealna priložnost za temeljitejšo analizo vprašanj v zvezi z umikom ali spremembo zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije,
that communication provides an excellent opportunity for a more thorough analysis of the problems connected with the withdrawal or the modification of legislative proposals by the Commission,
ker se zakonodajni akti Skupnosti z nekaterimi izjemami lahko sprejmejo le na podlagi predloga Komisije, ki ima skoraj popoln monopol nad zakonodajno pobudo,
with a few exceptions, most of the Community's legislative acts can only be adopted on the basis of a proposal from the Commission, which enjoys a quasi-monopoly over the legislative initiative,
ker člen 250(2) Pogodba ES določa, da lahko Komisija, "dokler Svet ne odloči", svoj predlog med postopkom za sprejetje akta Skupnosti kadar koli spremeni,
Article 250(2), of the EC Treaty stipulates that the Commission "may alter its proposal" at any moment of the procedure leading to the adoption of a Community act, "as long as the Council has not acted",
ker je treba kljub temu, da zaradi zgodovinskih razlogov vloga Parlamenta ni omenjena v členu 250(2), razlagati to odločbo skupaj s členom 251, če se uporablja za postopek soodločanja, in skupaj s členom 252, če se uporablja za postopek sodelovanja,
although, for historical reasons, the role of Parliament is not mentioned in Article 250(2), that provision must be interpreted in conjunction with Article 251 as concerns its application to the codecision procedure, and with Article 252 as concerns the cooperation procedure,
ker je za primere, ko je po prvi obravnavi sprejeto skupno stališče, v tretji alinei drugega pododstavka člena 251(2) Pogodbe ES Komisiji dovoljeno, da Parlament obvesti o svojem stališču, medtem ko je v primeru, da Parlament naknadno bistveno spremeni skupno stališče, v točki (c) tretjega pododstavka člena 251(2) Komisiji dovoljeno zgolj, da poda mnenje, na podlagi česar je jasno, da Komisija ni več "lastnica" svojega predloga,
whenever a common position is adopted after the first reading, the third indent of the second subparagraph of Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty only allows the Commission to inform Parliament of its own position and if the common position is subsequently amended by Parliament, point (c) of the third subparagraph of Article 251(2) only allows the Commission to deliver an opinion, thus making it clear that the Commission is no longer the "owner" of its proposals,