natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi morale občine, ki so že vključene ali se vključujejo v ponovno naselitev, vzpostaviti partnerstva in tesno medinstitucionalno sodelovanje z drugimi občinami v svoji državi in v državah članicah EU, da bi izmenjale svoje izkušnje na tem področju in okrepile sodelovanje v vsej EU;
Believes that municipalities already involved, or becoming involved, in resettlement should create partnerships and twinnings with other municipalities in their home country and in the EU Member States in order to exchange their experiences in this field and strengthen cooperation across the EU;
poudarja, da je treba vzpostaviti okvir za strukturirano sodelovanje z ukrepi za zbiranje strokovnega znanja ter omogočanje zbiranja in delitve informacij; poudarja tudi, da mora učinkovit program EU za ponovno naselitev omogočiti državam članicam (tistim, ki že sodelujejo v programu, in tistim, ki želijo sodelovati) dostop do človeških virov, strokovnega svetovanja in skupnih informacij, ki bi utegnile koristiti v kateri koli fazi pobude o ponovni naselitvi; priznava, da so vsi, ki sodelujejo pri ponovni naselitvi, zlasti ponovno naseljeni begunci, pomemben vir informacij za vrednotenje pobud za ponovno naselitev;
Stresses the need to establish a structured cooperation framework through measures to gather expertise and enable information collecting and sharing; stresses also that an effective EU Resettlement Programme must provide the Member States (those already participating in the programme and those that wish to participate) with access to human resources, expert advice and shared information that may be useful in any phase of the resettlement initiative; recognises that all those involved in resettlement, and especially resettled refugees, are a valuable source of information for the evaluation of resettlement initiatives;
poziva k preučitvi in izmenjavi najboljših praks, ki spodbujajo učinkovitost med državami članicami, kar lahko vključuje spodbujanje skupnih programov, medsebojno strokovno ocenjevanje, ustanovitev skupnih misij, uporabo skupne infrastrukture (kot so prehodni centri) in organizacijo misij v države članice za oceno potekajočih ponovnih naselitev;
Calls for the consideration and exchange of best practices which foster efficiency between Member States, which may include the promotion of joint programmes, peer evaluation, the setting-up of joint missions, the use of common infrastructures (such as transit centres) and organisation of missions to Member States to evaluate the ongoing resettlement;
poziva k upoštevanju pomembnosti ukrepov spremljanja kakovosti sprejema in vključevanja v državo članico gostiteljico; meni, da mora uspeh ponovne naselitve opredeljevati ne le fizična preselitev beguncev iz tretje države v državo članico, temveč tudi izvrševanje ukrepov, ki omogočajo vključevanje beguncev v državo gostiteljico;
Calls for the relevance of follow-up measures on the quality of reception and integration in the host Member States not to be disregarded; considers that the success of resettlement must be defined not only in terms of the physical displacement of refugees from a third country to a Member State but also in terms of the implementation of measures that allow the integration of refugees in the host country;
poziva, naj se posebna pozornost nameni človeškim virom, vključenim v vse sedanje in prihodnje programe EU za ponovno naselitev, da se zagotovi vzpostavitev postopka, ki bo omogočal dobre prakse prilagoditve in vključevanja beguncev v družbo gostiteljico, saj izkušnje kažejo, da je treba prizadevanja za ponovno naselitev spremljati z ustreznimi uslužbenci in strokovnjaki;
Calls for special attention to be given to the human resources involved in any present or future EU Resettlement Programme in order to ensure a procedure which allows good practices of adaptation and integration of refugees in the host society, as experience shows that resettlement efforts need to be conducted with monitoring by appropriate officers and experts;
Stalna enota za ponovno naselitev, temelj učinkovitega skupnega programa EU za ponovno naselitev
A permanent Resettlement Unit, cornerstone of an effective EU Joint Resettlement Programme
ugotavlja pomanjkanje strukturiranega sodelovanja pri dejavnostih ponovne naselitve v EU, ki zahtevajo znatno logistično pripravo, kot so izbirne in orientacijske misije, zdravstveni in varnostni pregledi, potovalne in vizumske ureditve ter programi sprejema in vključevanja, kakor so navedeni v sporočilu KOM(2009)0447 ;
Acknowledges the lack of structured cooperation regarding resettlement activities within the EU, which require considerable logistical preparation, such as selection and orientation missions, medical and security screenings, arrangements for travel and visas and reception and integration programmes, as mentioned in Communication COM(2009)0447 ;
poleg tega potrjuje stališče, da pomanjkanje mehanizmov sodelovanja in usklajevanja med državami članicami povečuje stroške operacij, povezanih s ponovno naselitvijo ter zmanjšuje njihovo privlačnost in njihov strateški učinek;
Confirms, moreover, the view that the absence of mechanisms of cooperation and coordination between Member States raises the costs of the operations related to resettlement, makes them less attractive and reduces their strategic impact;
zato priporoča vzpostavitev posebne enote z ustreznim osebjem za potrebno usklajevanje med vsemi dejavnostmi ponovne naselitve, ki potekajo v državah članicah;
Recommends, therefore, the creation of a specific unit with proper staff allocated to carry out the necessary coordination between all the ongoing resettlement activities in the Member States;
meni, da bi bil najustreznejši institucionalni okvir za enoto za ponovno naselitev urad EASO, kjer bi lahko sodelovala v okviru politike EU za azil in migracije;
Believes that the most appropriate institutional framework for this Resettlement Unit would be within the EASO, where it could cooperate in the ambit of EU policies in the area of asylum and migration;
meni, da bi lahko ta enota vzpostavila tesne stike z visokim komisarjem ZN za begunce in lokalnimi nevladnimi organizacijami, da bi tako pridobila pomembne informacije za posredovanje državam članicam in institucijam EU v zvezi na primer z nujnimi prednostnimi nalogami, tehnikami vključevanja itd.;
Considers that this unit could establish close contact with the UNHCR and local NGOs, in order to obtain important information to forward to the Member States and EU institutions regarding, for instance, urgent priorities, integration techniques, etc.;
vztraja tudi, da bi enota za ponovno naselitev lahko imela pomembno vlogo pri spremljanju in oceni učinkovitosti in kakovosti programa za ponovno naselitev na ravni EU, tako da bi sestavljala letna poročila o vseh dejavnostih na podlagi informacij, ki bi jih zbrale institucije in organi, ki bi bili vključeni v pobude za ponovno naselitev v državah članicah;
Insists also that the Resettlement Unit could play an important role in the monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of the Resettlement Programme at EU level by issuing annual reports on all the activities, based on information gathered by the institutions/authorities involved in the resettlement initiatives in the Member States;
želi poudariti, da bi morala enota za ponovno naselitev spremljati nevladne in dobrodelne organizacije ter druge subjekte, ki lahko v postopku ponovne naselitve beguncev sodelujejo z državnimi organi; poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi morala omenjena enota redno izdajati listine, v katerih bi bili navedeni standardi in merila, ki jih morajo ti subjekti spoštovati, da bi bili primerni za sodelovanje v načrtih EU za ponovno naselitev;
Wishes to emphasise that the Resettlement Unit should keep track of the NGOs, charities and other entities which are able to cooperate with public authorities in the process of resettlement of refugees; notes, moreover, that the above-mentioned Unit should regularly issue documents indicating the standards and criteria that these entities must comply with in order to be eligible to participate in EU resettlement schemes;
poudarja, da lahko urad EASO koristno prispeva k zagotavljanju skladnosti in dopolnjevanju med programom EU za ponovno naselitev in preostalo azilsko politiko EU;
Stresses that the EASO can make a very useful contribution to ensuring consistency and complementariness between the EU Resettlement Programme and other EU asylum policies;
Prilagodljivo določanje prednostnih nalog
Flexible priority-setting
ugotavlja, da ustrezen program ponovne naselitve zahteva redno posodabljanje seznama narodnosti in kategorij beguncev, ki bi morali v postopku ponovne naselitve imeti prednost, zlasti ob upoštevanju geografskih kriznih razmer in posebno ranljivih oseb, ki najbolj potrebujejo zaščito;
Recognises that an adequate resettlement programme requires a regular update of the nationalities and categories of refugees that should be prioritised in the resettlement process, with special regard to geographical emergencies and particularly vulnerable persons who are most in need of protection;
meni, da bi morala letne prednostne naloge EU določati Komisija, kot je predlagano, z intenzivno in učinkovito vključitvijo visokega komisarja ZN za begunce in Evropskega parlamenta v vse faze opredeljevanja in ocene kandidatov za ponovno naselitev;
Believes that the EU annual priorities should be established by the Commission, as proposed, with strong and effective involvement of the UNHCR and the European Parliament at all stages of the identification and assessment of candidates for resettlement;
predlaga, da na letnem srečanju strokovne skupine za begunce sodeluje delegacija članov Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve, Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za razvoj;
Suggests that a delegation of Members from its Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE), Foreign Affairs (AFET) and Development (DEVE) committees participate in the yearly meeting of the resettlement expert group;
meni, da bi program EU za ponovno naselitev moral vključevati posebne postopke, s katerimi bi se pri določanju letnih prednostnih nalog EU vključil Evropski parlament;
Considers that an EU Resettlement Programme should include specific procedures to involve the European Parliament in the elaboration of the EU annual priorities;
spodbuja urad EASO, naj sprejme pomembno vlogo pri opredelitvi načrta ponovne naselitve v EU;
Encourages the EASO to assume an important role in the definition of the resettlement agenda within the EU;
zagovarja načelo, da bi morale v skladu s potrebo po prilagodljivosti letnih prednostnih nalog EU obstajati kategorije, ki bi vsako leto ostale nespremenjene, da bi lahko države članice v katerem koli trenutku v letu ponovno naselile posebej ranljive osebe;
Defends the principle that, in line with the need for adaptability in the EU annual priorities, there should be categories which remain stable every year, so that Member States can resettle particularly vulnerable persons at any time of the year;
predlaga, da bi bilo državam članicam omogočeno, da se pripravijo za zasilne postopke v primerih nepredvidenih humanitarnih razmer – denimo, ko so begunci žrtve oboroženega napada ali ko naravne nesreče ali katastrofe resno prizadenejo begunska taborišča; meni, da bi ti postopki omogočili, da bi bili postopki ponovne naselitve kratki, upravni ukrepi pa bi se opravili bodisi časovno strnjeno ali v nekaterih primerih po preselitvi beguncev; priporoča, da se ta prizadevanja uvrstijo med cilje programa EU za ponovno naselitev;
Suggests that individual Member States may be enabled to prepare for emergency procedures in cases of unforeseen humanitarian circumstances – for instance, when refugees are under armed attack or when natural accidents or catastrophes seriously affect refugee camps; considers that these procedures would allow resettlement to take place in a short period of time, with the administrative steps being carried out either with a compressed timetable or, in certain cases, after the displacement of the refugees; recommends that this effort should be considered among the aims of the EU Resettlement Programme;
obžaluje, ker ima trenutno le deset držav članic programe ponovne naselitve, ki pa so bili vzpostavljeni brez medsebojnega usklajevanja;
Regrets that only 10 Member States currently have resettlement programmes, established without coordination among themselves;
priznava, da je sodelovanje držav članic še vedno prostovoljno, glede na razlike pri pogojih sprejemanja, sodelujočih straneh in pravnih merilih, ki se uporabljajo pri odločanju o tem, kdo bo ponovno naseljen;
Recognises that the participation of Member States remains voluntary, given the divergences in reception conditions, collaborating partners and legal criteria that are used to decide who to resettle;
priznava, da se nekatere države članice, zlasti južnoevropske, soočajo s posebnimi izzivi zaradi njihovega položaja na zunanji meji Unije;
Recognises that certain Member States, particularly in southern Europe, face special challenges because of their location at the external border of the Union;
vseeno poziva k večjim spodbudam, da se države članice motivirajo k sodelovanju v programu EU za ponovno naselitev; ugotavlja, da čeprav je večja finančna pomoč pomembna, se ne bi smela zanemariti prispevek, ki ga lahko v tem pogledu daje urad EASO tako, da prispeva k izenačitvi razmer s povečanjem kakovosti storitev, ki se nudijo beguncem v državah članicah, in da nudi pomoč z najučinkovitejšimi praksami gostitve in vključevanja;
Calls, nevertheless, for greater incentives to encourage more Member States to participate in the EU Resettlement Programme; acknowledges that, while greater financial assistance is important, one should not undermine the contribution that the EASO can provide with regard to this aspect by helping to equalise the situation through raising the quality of services offered to refugees in Member States and offering assistance with the most efficient practices for hosting and integration;
predlaga, da se nudi večja finančna pomoč državam članicam, ki želijo začeti sodelovanje v programu EU za ponovno naselitev, da se jim pomaga pri oblikovanju programa za trajno ponovno naselitev in se zmanjša začetno breme vzpostavitve take pobude; predlaga, da se zato, da bi se izognili pretiranemu pritisku na evropski sklad za begunce, po prvih letih udeležbe v programu vrednost finančne pomoči izenači z drugimi državami članicami;
Suggests more substantial financial assistance to Member States wishing to start participating in the EU Resettlement Programme, in order to help them create a sustainable resettlement programme and to alleviate the initial burden of setting up such an initiative; suggests that, in order to avoid an excessive impact on the European Refugee Fund, the value of the financial assistance should be equalised to the other Member States after the first years of participation to the programme;
meni, da ne bo mogoče povečati števila beguncev, ki so ponovno naseljeni v EU, brez upravnega in strokovnega okvira, ki bo služil kot osnova programu, in brez vzpostavitve trajnih struktur za pripravo ponovne naselitve in spremljanje postopka vključevanja;
Believes that it will not be possible to increase the number of refugees resettled in the EU without an administrative and expert framework to underpin the programme and the creation of permanent structures to prepare for resettlement and follow-up on the integration process;
Nadaljnji ukrepi
Follow-up measures
meni, da mora učinkovit program EU za ponovno naselitev vključevati določbe o nadaljnjih ukrepih, s poudarkom na kakovosti ponovne naselitve v vsaki državi članici, visokim standardom v vsaki fazi od priznanja do sprejema ter vključevanja beguncev;
Considers that an effective EU Resettlement Programme must include provisions on follow-up measures, insisting on the quality of the resettlement in each Member State, good standards at every stage from recognition to reception and integration of the refugees;
poziva države članice, ki so vključene v program ponovne naselitve, naj ocenijo svoje ukrepe, sprejete v postopku ponovne naselitve, da bi se zagotovilo in izboljšalo vključevanje beguncev.
Calls on the Member States involved in the resettlement programme to evaluate their measures taken in the resettlement procedure so as to secure and improve the refugees' integration.
Države članice naj vključevanje beguncev tudi redno spremljajo;
Member States should also follow up regularly on the refugees' integration;
meni, da bi državne oblasti morale spodbujati čim tesnejše sodelovanje z nevladnimi subjekti (denimo mednarodnimi in lokalnimi nevladnimi organizacijami) in izkoristiti strokovno znanje in bližino slednjih pri sprožitvi najboljših in najučinkovitejših pobud za ponovno naselitev beguncev; sodelovanje civilne družbe pri evropskem programu ponovne naselitve bo okrepilo podporo in pobude za sprejem pri državah članicah in lokalnih oblasteh;
Is of the opinion that governmental authorities should foster maximum cooperation with non-governmental entities (international and local NGOs, for instance) and benefit from the expertise and proximity of the latter in providing the best and most efficient initiatives for resettlement of refugees; participation by civil society in the European Resettlement Programme will underpin support and reception initiatives by the Member States and local authorities;
zagovarja intenzivna prizadevanja vseh vključenih subjektov, da se beguncem, zlasti najranljivejšim, zagotovi dostop do ustreznega bivališča, zdravstvenega varstva, izobrazbe, jezikovnih tečajev in psihološke pomoči ter dostop do trga dela, da se tako zagotovi uspešno vključevanje;
Advocates intensive efforts on the part of all the entities involved to grant the refugees, especially the most vulnerable, access to adequate housing, health care, education, language courses and psychological assistance, as well as access to the labour market, so as to ensure successful integration;
poziva urad EASO, zlasti prek njegove predlagane enote za ponovno naselitev, da v tesnem sodelovanju z visokim komisarjem ZN za begunce, nevladnimi organizacijami in lokalnimi oblastmi določi jasna merila za kakovostno ponovno naselitev in naj spremlja ponovno naselitev beguncev, da s tem prispeva k oceni dejavnosti in dodatnemu izboljšanju ponovne naselitve v državah članicah;
Calls on the EASO, in particular through its proposed resettlement Unit, to establish clear criteria for quality resettlement in close cooperation with the UNHCR, NGOs and local authorities and follow the resettlement of the refugees, in order to contribute to the evaluation and further improvement of the resettlement activities in the Member States;
ponovno poudarja vlogo urada EASO kot subjekta, ki bi lahko, če bi bil opremljen s stalno enoto za ponovno naselitev, ozaveščal o nekaterih pomanjkljivostih pobud za ponovno naselitev, pomagal državam članicam pri iskanju specifičnih rešitev in spodbujal boljše prakse;
Underlines once again the role of the EASO as an entity which could raise awareness of certain shortcomings in the resettlement initiatives, assisting the Member States in finding specific solutions, and encourage better practices if provided with a permanent Resettlement Unit;
poziva k organizaciji skupne letne razprave Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za zunanje zadeve, da bi Parlament tako prispeval k razvoju programa;
Calls for the organisation of a joint annual debate of its Committees on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and on Foreign Affairs in order to contribute to the development of the programme;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. maja 2010 o ključnih kompetencah za spreminjajoči se svet: izvajanje delovnega programa Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010 ( 2010/2013(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 18 May 2010 on key competences for a changing world: implementation of the Education and Training 2010 work programme ( 2010/2013(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. novembra 2009 z naslovom „Ključne kompetence za spreminjajoči se svet“ ( KOM(2009)0640 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 25 November 2009 entitled ‘Key competences for a changing world’ ( COM(2009)0640 ),
ob upoštevanju osmih ključnih kompetenc, navedenih v Priporočilu Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta št. 2006/962/ES z dne 18. decembra 2006 o ključnih kompetencah za vseživljenjsko učenje – evropski referenčni okvir UL L 394, 30.12.2006, str.
having regard to the eight key skills set out in Recommendation 2006/962/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 entitled ‘Key Competences for lifelong learning – A European Reference Framework’ OJ L 394, 30.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju desetletnega delovnega programa „Izobraževanje in usposabljanje 2010“ in poznejših skupnih vmesnih poročil o napredku pri izvajanju tega programa,
having regard to the 10-year ‘Education and Training 2010’ work programme, and to the subsequent joint interim reports on progress towards its implementation,
ob upoštevanju poročila strokovne skupine o novih znanjih in spretnostih za nova delovna mesta z naslovom „Nova znanja in spretnosti za nova delovna mesta: ukrepajmo zdaj“,
having regard to the report by the Expert Group on new skills for new jobs entitled ‘New Skills for New Jobs: Action Now’,
ob upoštevanju okvira evropskega sodelovanja na področju mladine, ki je bil sprejet novembra 2009,
having regard to the Framework for European cooperation on in the youth field adopted in November 2009,
ob upoštevanju evropskega soglasja o izobraževanju za razvoj, strateškega okvira, ki so ga novembra 2007 oblikovali predstavniki institucij EU, držav članic, civilne družbe in drugih zainteresiranih strani,
having regard to the European Development Education Consensus, a strategy framework drawn up by representatives of the EU institutions, the Member States, civil society and other stakeholders in November 2007,
ob upoštevanju podrobnih ocen nacionalnih poročil in dosežkov na podlagi vrste kazalnikov in primerjalnih meril ( SEC(2009)1598 in SEC(2009)1616 ),
having regard to the detailed assessment of national reports and performance against a set of indicators and benchmarks ( SEC(2009)1598 and SEC(2009)1616 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 165 in 166 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 165 and 166 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
ob upoštevanju člena 48 poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A7-0141/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A7-0141/2010 ),
ker sta kakovostno izobraževanje in usposabljanje nujna za osebnostni razvoj posameznika, enakost, boj proti socialni izključenosti in revščini ter aktivno državljanstvo in socialno kohezijo,
whereas quality education and training are a must in terms of personal fulfilment of the individual, equality, fighting social exclusion and poverty, active citizenship and social cohesion,
ker je izboljšanje kakovosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja za vse študente, da dosežejo boljše rezultate in kompetence, najprej z novimi in prodornejšimi politikami za povečanje ponudbe izobraževanja, prednostna naloga,
whereas improving the quality of education and training for all students in order to attain better results and competences, initially through new and more incisive policies to increase educational supply, is a priority,
ker kljub nekaterim izboljšavam v izobraževanju in usposabljanju v Evropski uniji večina primerjalnih meril, določenih za leto 2010, ne bo dosežena; ker so zlasti ravni znanj in spretnosti še vedno nezadostne in ker ima ena tretjina prebivalstva v Evropi zelo nizko raven izobrazbe,
whereas despite some improvement in education and training performance in the European Union the majority of the EU benchmarks set out for 2010 will not be reached, whereas in particular skills levels remain inadequate and whereas one third of the population of Europe have very low-level educational qualifications,