natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ostro obsoja vse oblike rasizma na nogometnih tekmah, tako na igrišču kot zunaj njega;
Strongly condemns all forms of racism at football matches, both on and off the field;
želi pohvaliti odlično delo, ki so ga organizacije, kot sta UEFA in mreža "Football against Racism in Europe" (FARE), že opravile v boju proti tem težavam;
Commends the excellent work that organisations such as UEFA and FARE (Football Against Racism in Europe) have done in tackling these problems;
poziva vse, ki v nogometu zasedajo vidne položaje, naj redno nastopajo proti rasizmu;
Calls on all those with a high profile in football to speak out regularly against racism;
poziva nacionalne nogometne zveze, lige, klube, združenja igralcev in navijaške skupine, naj ravnajo po preverjeni praksi Uefe, kot je Uefin akcijski načrt v desetih točkah;
Calls on national football associations, leagues, clubs, players" unions and supporters" groups to apply UEFA best practice, such as the UEFA Ten-Point Plan of Action;
poziva Uefo in vse ostale organizatorje tekmovanj v Evropi, naj zagotovijo, da bodo imeli sodniki, ob upoštevanju strogih in jasnih smernic, možnost prekiniti ali zaključiti tekmo v primeru hujših rasističnih izgredov;
Calls on UEFA and all other competition organisers in Europe to ensure that referees have the option, according to clear and strict guidelines, of stopping or abandoning matches in the event of serious racist abuse;
poziva Uefo in vse ostale organizatorje tekmovanj v Evropi, naj preučijo možnost kaznovanja nacionalnih nogometnih zvez in klubov, katerih navijači ali igralci storijo hujši rasistični prestopek, vključno z možnostjo, da se povratnike izključi iz tekmovanj;
Calls on UEFA and all other competition organisers in Europe to consider the option of imposing sporting sanctions on national football associations and clubs whose supporters or players commit serious racist offences, including the option of removing persistent offenders from their competitions;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in vladam držav članic ter Uefi.
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories, to the Council, the Commission, the governments of the Member States and UEFA.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o sklenitvi Partnerskega sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Federativnimi državami Mikronezije o ribolovu v Federativnih državah Mikronezije ( KOM(2005)0502 - C6-0353/2005 – 2005/0206(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation concerning the conclusion of the Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Federated States of Micronesia on fishing in the Federated States of Micronesia ( COM(2005)0502 – C6-0353/2005 – 2005/0206(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2005)0502 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2005)0502 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0353/2005 ),
having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0353/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ter mnenj Odbora za proračun in Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0035/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Development ( A6-0035/2006 ),
odobri predlog Uredbe Sveta, kakor je bil spremenjen, in odobrava sklenitev sporazuma;
Approves the proposal for a Council regulation as amended and approves conclusion of the agreement;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in federativnim državam Mikronezije.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Federated States of Micronesia.
V zadnjem letu veljavnosti Protokola in pred sklenitvijo sporazuma o njegovi obnovitvi Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži poročilo o izvajanju Sporazuma.
During the final year of the Protocol's validity and before another agreement is concluded on its renewal, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the implementation of the Agreement.
Na podlagi poročila, navedenega v členu 2a, in po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom Svet pooblasti Komisijo, če je to ustrezno, za pogajanja z namenom sprejetja novega protokola.
On the basis of the report referred to in Article 2a and after consulting the European Parliament, the Council shall, where appropriate, give the Commission a negotiating mandate with a view to the adoption of a new protocol.
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poroča o izvajanju večletnega sektorskega programa in uporabi izvedbenih pravil tega programa iz člena 5(2) Protokola.
The Commission shall report to the European Parliament and the Council on the carrying-out of the multiannual sectoral programme and the application of its implementing rules referred to in Article 5(2) of the Protocol.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 3690/93 o ustanovitvi sistema Skupnosti, ki določa predpise za osnovne podatke, ki jih morajo vsebovati ribolovna dovoljenja ( KOM(2005)0499 – C6-0354/2005 – 2005/0205(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation repealing Regulation (EC) No 3690/93 establishing a Community system laying down rules for the minimum information to be contained in fishing licences ( COM(2005)0499 – C6-0354/2005 – 2005/0205(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0499 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0499 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0354/2005 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0354/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0037/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0037/2006 ),
(3a) Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1281/2005 spreminja določbe zakonodaje Skupnosti, ki se uporabljajo za ribolovna dovoljenja, da se določijo minimalne zahteve in da se pojasni vloga ribolovnih dovoljenj pri upravljanju zmogljivosti flote.
(3a) Regulation (EC) No 1281/2005 modifies the provisions of Community law applying to fishing licences in order to adapt the minimum information requirements and to clarify the role of the fishing license in the management of fleet capacity.
(3b) Stalež številnih vrst v vodah Skupnosti nenehno pada, zato je nujno izboljšati in razširiti veljavne ohranjevalne ukrepe; v tem pogledu ribolovna dovoljenja zagotavljajo prilagodljiv in koristen instrument upravljanja.
(3b) A number of stocks in Community waters have continued to decline and it is consequently necessary to improve and extend existing conservation measures; in this respect fishing licences provide a flexible and useful management tool.
Sprememba 3 Uvodna izjava 3 c (novo)
Amendment 3 Recital 3 c (new)
(3c) Cilj bi moral biti omogočanje smotrnega in odgovornega izkoriščanja živih vodnih virov ob priznavanju interesov ribiškega sektorja za njegov dolgoročni razvoj in gospodarske in družbene pogoje v njem ter interesov potrošnikov, ob upoštevanju bioloških omejitev in spoštovanju morskega ekosistema.
(3c) The objective should be to provide for rational and responsible exploitation of living aquatic resources, while recognising the interest of the fisheries sector in its long-term development and its economic and social conditions and the interest of consumers, taking into account the biological constraints with due respect for the marine eco-system.
Sprememba 4 Uvodna izjava 3 d (novo)
Amendment 4 Recital 3 d (new)
(3d) Sklepi o ohranjevalnih ukrepih pomembno vplivajo na gospodarski in družbeni razvoj tistih regij držav članic, v katerih je ribištvo pomembna industrija.
(3d) Conservation decisions have important effects on the economic and social development of those regions of the Member States where fishing is an important industry.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje ( 2005/2175(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the evaluation of the European arrest warrant ( 2005/2175(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga vlaga Adeline Hazan v imenu skupine PSE o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje( B6-0455/2005 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Adeline Hazan on behalf of the PSE Group on evaluation of the European arrest warrant ( B6-0455/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju Amsterdamske pogodbe, v kateri je prvič zapisan cilj vzpostavitve evropskega pravosodnega prostora,
having regard to the Treaty of Amsterdam, which enshrined, for the first time, the objective of establishing a European judicial area,
ob upoštevanju zaključkov predsedstva v Tampereju 15. in 16. oktobra 1999, kjer je bilo načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sprejeto kot temeljni kamen pravosodnega sodelovanja,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Tampere European Council of 15 and 16 October 1999, which established the principle of mutual recognition as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation,
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 6. februarja 2002 o predlogu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami UL C 284, 21.11.2002, str.
having regard to its position of 6 February 2002 on the draft Council framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ C 284 E, 21.11.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 23. februarja 2005 na podlagi člena 34 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ ( KOM(2005)0063 ),
having regard to the Commission's report of 23 February 2005 based on Article 34 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA ( COM(2005)0063 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 24. januarja 2006 na podlagi člena 34 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ ( KOM(2006)0008 ),
having regard to the Commission's report of 24 January 2006 based on Article 34 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA ( COM(2006)0008 ),
ob upoštevanju sodb ustavnih sodišč Poljske (27. april 2005), Nemčije (18. julij 2005) in Cipra (7. november 2005) ter nekaterih postopkov v teku, zlasti postopka pred belgijskim arbitražnim sodiščem,
having regard to the judgments of the constitutional courts of Poland (27 April 2005), Germany (18 July 2005) and Cyprus (7 November 2005) and the various procedures under way, notably that before the Belgian Court of Arbitration,
ob upoštevanju parlamentarnega srečanja 17. in 18. oktobra 2005 o boljšem parlamentarnem nadzoru na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v Evropi, na katerem se je zbralo okoli sto predstavnikov nacionalnih parlamentov in članov Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve,
having regard to the parliamentary meeting held on 17 and 18 October 2005 on improving parliamentary scrutiny of judicial and police cooperation in Europe, with the participation of 100 national parliamentarians and members of its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs,
ob upoštevanju člena 114(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 114(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0049/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0049/2006 ),
ker je evropski nalog za prijetje inovativen in spodbuden zgled, ki lahko pozitivno vpliva na razvoj pravosodnega sodelovanja, krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja in državljanske svoboščine,
having regard to the innovative and exemplary role of the European arrest warrant in the development of judicial cooperation and the strengthening of mutual trust, as well as its direct impact on civil liberties,
ker evropski nalog za prijetje ostaja eno od glavnih orodij Evropske unije na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja in boja proti terorizmu ter proti hudim oblikam kriminala,
whereas the European arrest warrant remains one of the EU's key instruments for judicial cooperation and the fight against terrorism and large-scale crime,
ker se je po ugotovitvah, ki jih prinaša prva ocena Komisije, evropski nalog za prijetje izkazal kot učinkovit v primerjavi s postopkom izročitve, ki je počasen, težaven in zastarel, ter omejuje možnost, da bi se obdolženec ali obsojenec izognil pravici zaradi načela pravne suverenosti, in omogoča bolj učinkovit boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu,
whereas the Commission's initial evaluation shows that the European arrest warrant has demonstrated its effectiveness by comparison with the slow, cumbersome and out-of-date extradition procedure, while also making it possible to reduce the risks of a defendant or sentenced person eluding justice for reasons of 'legal sovereignty', as well as to fight organised crime and terrorism more effectively,
ker je za razliko od postopka izročitve ena od smernic evropskega naloga za prijetje odprava vmešavanja političnih organov v postopek,
whereas one of the advances introduced by the European arrest warrant is the removal of interference by the political authorities in the procedure, by contrast with the extradition procedure,
ker je več držav članic izrazilo željo, da bi ohranile določene elemente klasičnega izročitvenega postopka (izogibanje dvojni kaznivosti, poseg političnih oblasti v sodne postopke) oziroma dodale nove razloge za zavrnitev izvršitve, ki so v nasprotju z Okvirnim sklepom 2002/584/PNZ, kot npr. politični razlogi, nacionalna varnost ali spoštovanje človekovih pravic,
having regard to the wishes expressed by several Member States concerning retention of certain elements of the traditional extradition system (controls to avoid double jeopardy, intervention of the political authorities in the judicial procedure) or the introduction of additional grounds for refusal which would be contrary to Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, such as political reasons, national security or human rights arguments,
ker se pri izvajanju evropskega naloga za prijetje porajajo povsem praktične ovire, vključno s problemi prevodov, posredovanja ali uporabe različnih obrazcev, nezdružljivih z zahtevami evropskega naloga za prijetje,
having regard to the practical obstacles that have been encountered in the operation of the European arrest warrant, including problems of translation, transmission or use of differing forms incompatible with its criteria,
ker v več državah članicah prihaja do težav pri prenosu v notranjo zakonodajo (zlasti v Nemčiji) in ker je treba nacionalna ustavna besedila uskladiti z Okvirnim sklepom 2002/584/PNZ, da bi na ta način omogočili predajo lastnih državljanov (zlasti Poljska in Ciper),
having regard to the difficulties of transposition encountered by several Member States (especially Germany) and to the need to bring national constitutions into line with Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA in order to permit the surrender of nationals (in particular in Poland and Cyprus),
ker obstaja bojazen, da bi omenjene težave lahko izpodkopale medsebojno zaupanje in sprožile verižno reakcijo, ki bi postavila pod vprašaj uporabo evropskega naloga za prijetje v drugih državah članicah, kot to kaže dejstvo, da je zaradi sklepa nemškega ustavnega sodišča, ki je razveljavilo zakonodajo za prenos Okvirnega sklepa, več držav članic dalo vedeti, da bodo morale prehodno uporabljati postopek izročitve, dokler ne bo sprejet nov zakon o prenosu, skladen z nemškim Temeljnim zakonom,
concerned that these problems may undermine mutual trust and lead to a chain reaction which could threaten the implementation of the European arrest warrant by other Member States, as is demonstrated by the fact that, following the decision by the German Constitutional Court to annul the legislation transposing the Framework Decision, a number of Member States have indicated that they will have to return to applying, on a transitional basis, the extradition instruments that existed before the European arrest warrant, pending adoption of a new transposing law that is compatible with the German Basic Law,
ker je nezadostno medsebojno zaupanje med sodišči posledica nezadostnih minimalnih standardov Skupnosti v kazenskih postopkih, kar zmanjšuje učinkovitost pravosodnega sodelovanja,
whereas the lack of mutual trust between courts is associated with the shortage of common minimum standards in criminal procedures, which hampers effective judicial cooperation,
ker želi opozoriti, da izgradnja območja svobode, varnosti in pravice temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju in je nemogoča brez ustreznega minimalnega približevanja nacionalnih zakonodaj, kot je Evropski parlament poudaril v svoji resoluciji z dne 22. februarja 2005 UL C 304 E, 1.12.2005, str.
whereas the creation of the European area of freedom, security and justice based on mutual trust cannot be conceived without a minimum degree of harmonisation of national laws, as Parliament stressed in its recommendation of 22 February 2005 OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
ker je prva ocena Komisije ( KOM(2005)0063 ) zajemala le 24 držav članic in jo je bilo mogoče šele nedavno dopolniti glede Italije ( KOM(2006)0008 ), zadnje države članice glede prenosa Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ v notranje pravo,
whereas the Commission's first evaluation ( COM(2005)0063 ) concerned only 24 Member States and was completed for Italy, the last Member State to transpose Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, only recently ( COM(2006)0008 ),
ker se je med razpravo na parlamentarnem srečanju 17. in 18. oktobra 2005 izkazalo, da so si težave, s katerimi se pri prenosu srečujejo države članice, precej podobne, in ker bo v prihodnosti nujno treba povečati izmenjavo podatkov ter okrepiti sodelovanje med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom, da bi zagotovili pravilen prenos Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ in nekaterih drugih besedil, ki se še proučujejo,
whereas the transposition problems encountered by Member States are essentially of a similar nature, as is evident from the debates which took place at the parliamentary meeting of 17 and 18 October 2005; whereas in future fuller exchanges of information and closer cooperation between the national parliaments and the European Parliament will be necessary with a view to ensuring the transposition in correct conditions of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA and of other texts still under consideration,
ker osnutek Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo prinaša številne novosti na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v Evropi; ker med temi novostmi ukinitev "stebrov" in prenos na raven Skupnosti pomenita krepitev zmožnosti delovanja Evropske unije, večjo demokratičnost in preglednost sprejetih sklepov; ker med nedavnimi kampanjami za ratifikacijo ali proti njej ta del osnutka pogodbe ni sprožal razprav oziroma nasprotovanj,
whereas the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe includes a number of improvements in police and judicial cooperation in Europe; whereas, among those improvements, the abolition of the "pillars" and the communitarisation of procedures are such as to enhance the EU's capacity for action as well as the democratic and transparent nature of the decisions taken; whereas this part of the Treaty was not a subject for debate or opposition during the recent ratification campaigns,
ker je žal vloga Evropskega parlamenta pri sprejemanju evropskega naloga za prijetje omejena in ker sta omejena tudi ocena ter nadzor Sodišča pri njegovem izvajanju, to pa zaradi dejstva, da gre za instrument tretjega stebra, ki temelji na členih 31 in 34 Pogodbe EU (naslov VI),
regretting the fact that the role of Parliament in the adoption of the European arrest warrant and in its evaluation, and the Court of Justice's scrutiny of its enforcement, are limited by its status as a third-pillar instrument based on Articles 31 and 34 of the EU Treaty (Title VI),
ker bi bilo prav, da se trenutno veljavne pogodbe uporabljajo v celoti in je torej treba pričeti z izvajanjem člena 42 Pogodbe EU, ki predvideva možnost, da se države članice odločijo vključiti evropski nalog za prijetje v prvi steber, zato da bi zagotovile demokratičen nadzor s strani Evropskega parlamenta in sodni nadzor s strani Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti,
having regard to the need to apply the Treaties currently in force in full, and, accordingly, to give effect to Article 42 of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Member States may decide to bring the European arrest warrant under the first pillar, in order to ensure democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament and judicial scrutiny by the European Court of Justice,
ker so Konvencijo o nordijskem nalogu za prijetje 15. decembra 2005 podpisale Danska, Finska, Islandija, Švedska in Norveška; ker kljub temu, da temelji na načelih in strukturi evropskega naloga za prijetje, nordijski nalog za prijetje v primerjavi z evropskim vsebuje več smernic z bolj učinkovito shemo predaje, še zlasti zaradi zmanjšanega števila možnosti neizvršitve in krajših rokov od tistih, ki jih predvideva evropski nalog za prijetje; ker se bo lahko Evropska unija koristno zgledovala po nordijskem nalogu za prijetje in na ta način povečala učinkovitost evropskega naloga za prijetje,
whereas the Convention establishing a Nordic arrest warrant was signed on 15 December 2005 by Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Sweden and Norway; whereas, although it is based on the principles and structure of the European arrest warrant, the Nordic arrest warrant integrates a number of advances on it, with a more effective set of rules on surrender, thanks, notably, to the reduction in the number of optional grounds for non-execution and to procedural deadlines that are shorter than those for the European arrest warrant; whereas the EU could usefully take inspiration from the Nordic arrest warrant to improve the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant,
naslovi na Svet naslednja priporočila:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
kar najhitreje sprejeti predlog Okvirnega sklepa o določenih procesnih pravicah pri kazenskih postopkih na celotnem območju Evropske unije, ob upoštevanju sprememb Parlamenta, kot so podane v njegovem stališču z dne 12. aprila 2005 UL C 33 E, 9.2.2006, str.
adopt, as soon as possible, the proposal for a framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union, taking account of Parliament's amendments in its position of 12 April 2005 OJ C 33 E, 9.2.2006, p.
; tak ukrep je bistvenega pomena zato, da bi državljani Evropske unije lahko dejansko uživali enako raven pravne zaščite, in njegova jamstva bodo olajšala predajo državljana ene države članice drugi državi članici,
; this measure is essential in order to ensure the same standard of legal protection for all European citizens, and its guarantees will facilitate the surrender by a Member State of one of its nationals to another Member State;
zagotoviti, da države članice pri prenosu Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ ne bi ponovno uvedle sistematičnega nadzora dvojne kaznivosti za svoje državljane, saj to škoduje učinkovitosti evropskega naloga za prijetje in slabi načelo medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami,
ensure that, in the transposition of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, Member States do not reinstate systematic checks regarding double jeopardy for their nationals, as this would undermine both the effectiveness of the European arrest warrant and erode mutual trust between Member States;