natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da je bilo v proračunski vrstici za plačilo najemnin zagotovljeno neposredno vnaprejšnje financiranje začetne stopnje gradnje nove stavbe KAD v višini 10,2 milijona EUR v predlogu predsedstva; se zaveda, da bi to prostovoljno vnaprejšnje financiranje pomagalo zmanjšati stroške financiranja, vendar pa glede na zelo tesne razmere za leto 2011 sklene v načrt prihodkov in odhodkov za ta namen vnesti znesek, nižji za 6,2 milijona EUR; izraža pripravljenost, da jeseni 2010 ponovno oceni ta znesek na podlagi novih podatkov o proračunskih razmerah in razvoja dogodkov glede nepremičninske politike Parlamenta;
Notes that a provision for a direct pre-financing of the initial stage of the construction of the new KAD building has been made for an amount of EUR 10,2 million on the budget line for lease payments in the Bureau's proposal; recognises that such a voluntary pre-financing would help reduce the financing costs but, taking into account the extremely tight situation for 2011, decides to enter a lower amount of EUR 6,2 million for this purpose in the estimates; is willing to reassess this amount in autumn 2010 based on an update of the budgetary situation and developments in Parliament's building policy;
pripisuje pomen temeljitemu pregledu varnostne politike, ki ga je napovedalo predsedstvo, in v zvezi s tem spominja, da vztraja pri premišljeni porabi sredstev in, zlasti pri stroškovno učinkovitem ravnotežju med notranjim in zunanjim osebjem; prosi predsedstvo, naj skrbno preuči operativne in finančne posledice nove strategije, tako da bo v predloženem predlogu poskrbljeno za dobro ravnotežje med varnostnimi vidiki na eni strani ter dostopnostjo in odprtostjo na drugi; poudarja, da bi moral Parlament ostati čim bolj odprta in dostopna institucija; zato si želi prejemati več informacij s strani uprave o tako imenovanem projektu Wiertz, da bo lahko ocenil učinke glede dostopnosti Parlamenta za javnost;
Attaches importance to the in-depth review on security policy announced by the Bureau and, in this regard, recalls its attachment to a prudent use of resources and, particularly, a cost-effective balance between internal staff and external agents; asks the Bureau to carefully examine the operational and financial implications of a new strategy, aiming to strike a good balance in the proposals to be made between security concerns on the one hand and accessibility and openness on the other hand; stresses that Parliament should remain as much as possible an open and accessible institution; for this reason wishes to receive more information from the administration concerning the so-called ‘Wiertz project’ in order to assess its implications relating to the accessibility of Parliament for the public;
Strategija Informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij (IKT)
ICT Strategy
pozdravlja bolj strukturiran pristop k IKT in oblikovanje celostne strategije za to področje; poleg tega ponovno poudarja, da podpira internalizacijo funkcij, kar bi zmanjšalo odvisnost od zunanjih izvajalcev; vendar pa ugotavlja, da so bila že tretje leto zapored zagotovljena nova delovna mesta; zato meni, da je to vprašanje treba pojasniti;
Welcomes the more structured approach to ICT and the elaboration of a comprehensive strategy in this field; also reiterates its support for a sufficient internalisation of functions to reduce the dependence on external providers; notes, however, that new posts were already given three years in a row; therefore considers this an issue to be clarified;
ugotavlja, da je za projekt IT mobilnosti poslancev, in zlasti za pokritje mobilnih komunikacij, namenjenih 5 milijonov EUR; želi dodatne informacije glede na ta sorazmerno visok znesek;
Notes that EUR 5 million is earmarked for a Members' IT mobility project and, in particular, to cover mobile communications; would like to receive more information given the relatively high amount;
pozdravlja majhno povišanje finančnih sredstev za uresničevanje ukrepov, povezanih s sistemom EMAS in zmanjševanjem ogljika, razporejenih po celotnem proračunu, in ponovno poudarja pomen, ki ga daje temu vprašanju;
Welcomes the modest increase in funding to implement the EMAS and CO2 reduction measures, spread across the entire budget, and underlines further the importance it attaches to this issue;
se v zvezi s tem seznanja z razvojem ključnih kazalnikov uspešnosti od leta 2006, kot so predloženi v Pregledu okoljskega upravljanja za leto 2008, zlasti 12,9 % zmanjšanje emisij ogljika, 0,8 % zmanjšanje porabe elektrike, 7,4 % povečanje porabe plina/nafte/ogrevanja v letu 2008, potem ko se je leta 2007 ta poraba zmanjšala za 17,5 %, 8,8 % povečanje emisij zaradi premičnosti/prometa, povečanje odstotka recikliranih odpadkov od 49,8 % v letu 2006 na 55,4 % v letu 2008, 18,1 % povečanje porabe vode in 16,9 % zmanjšanje porabe papirja;
Notes the evolution of key performance indicators since 2006 in this respect as included in the Environmental Management Review for the year 2008, notably a reduction in carbon footprint of 12,9%, a decrease in electricity consumption of 0,8 %, an increase in gas/oil/ heat consumption of 7,4% in 2008, after a decrease of 17,5% in 2007, an increase in mobility/ transport emissions of 8,8%, an increase in the percentage of recycled waste from 49,8% in 2006 to 55,4% in 2008, an increase in water consumption of 18,1 % and a decrease of paper consumption of 16,9 %;
pozdravlja prilogo k proračunu o upravljanju okolja, ki podaja dober tehnični pregled zadevnih proračunskih postavk; v zvezi s tem bi pozdravil tudi, če bi bila v tej prilogi vključena letna poročila EMAS z obsežnejšimi informaciji o diferenciranem ogljičnem odtisu stavb Parlamenta v Strasbourgu, Bruslju in Luxembourgu ter o potovanjih in prevozu, povezanih z zasedanji, tekočih rezultatih zmanjšanja emisij ogljika Parlamenta in opisanih koristnih vplivih teh naložb na okolje ter morebitnih dolgoročnejših prihrankih;
Welcomes the budgetary annex on environmental management which gives a good technical overview of the budget items involved; would also welcome, in this context and in the same annex, the inclusion in the annual EMAS reports of more information on the differentiated carbon footprint of the Parliament's buildings in Strasbourg, Brussels and Luxembourg as well as on session-related travel and transport, to present the current results of reducing Parliament's carbon footprint and to illustrate the beneficial impact on the environment as a result of these investments, and indeed any savings achieved in the longer term;
ugotavlja, da je proračunska postavka za potne stroške poslancev pravzaprav višja od postavke za plače; poudarja potrebo po odgovorni porabi nadomestil, zlasti nadomestil za potne stroške, in poudarja, da bi lahko brez spremembe sedanjih pravil zmanjšali emisije ogljika Parlamenta in obenem prihranili stroške, če bi takrat, ko je to mogoče, med kraji delovanja Parlamenta namesto letov v poslovnem razredu uporabljali druga prevozna sredstva; poziva predsedstvo, naj v skladu z dogovorom iz predhodnega usklajevanja in pravočasno za prvo obravnavo Parlamenta predstavi študijo, osredotočeno na delovanju novega sistema in možnih rešitvah, ki jih je treba izvajati, da se ustvarijo prihranki;
Notes that the budget item for Members' travel costs is actually higher than the one for salaries; underlines the need for responsible use of allowances, notably travel allowances, and points out that without changing the current rules and by using, where possible, other means of transport than business class air travel from and to Parliament's places of work, Parliament's carbon footprint can be reduced and costs saved at the same time; calls on the Bureau to present, as agreed during the last pre-conciliation, in time for Parliament's first reading, a study focused on the functioning of the new system and possible solutions for savings to be carried out;
zahteva, da se tam, kjer je to mogoče in primerno, računovodskim izkazom dodajo okoljske izjave, ki se uporabljajo znotraj institucije;
Asks that, where possible and appropriate, environmental statements be added to the financial statements used within the institution;
meni, da je treba direktive o javnih naročilih spremeniti tako, da bo vanje lažje vključiti, kjer je to možno in ustrezno, okoljske in socialne klavzule;
Believes that public procurement directives need to be better adapted to facilitate, where possible and appropriate, the inclusion of environmental and social clauses;
pozdravlja dogovor o povečanju zneska za 2,6 milijonov EUR za financiranje 110 obiskovalcev, ki bi jih poslanci lahko letno povabili namesto sedanjih 100; meni, da bi utegnilo biti primerno, da bi si pred preučitvijo kakršnega koli dodatnega povečanja vzeli nekaj časa za oceno delovanja novega centra za obiskovalce; službe, pristojne za organizacijo obiskov morajo upoštevati tudi to, da bi poslanci morda želeli razdeliti obiskovalce na različno velike skupine v obdobju enega leta;
Welcomes the agreement for an increase of EUR 2,6 million in order to finance 110 annual visitors that Members can invite instead of the current 100; takes the view that it may be appropriate to have some time to evaluate the functioning of the new visitors' centre before considering any further increase; the services responsible for the organisation of the visits should also take into account that Members may wish to split the visitor groups into different sizes over the year;
odobrava 3 milijone EUR proračunskih sredstev, namenjenih odprtju centra za obiskovalce in stroškom delovanja za celo običajno leto; poudarja, da je treba prvo leto oceniti tudi iz finančnega vidika, vključno s temi tekočimi stroški;
Approves the EUR 3 million budgeted in relation to the opening of the visitors' centre and the operating costs for a standard full year; points out the need to evaluate the initial year also from a financial point of view, including these running costs;
je seznanjen s sklepom predsedstva o uvedbi dodatkov za nosilce funkcije, kar pomeni 400.000 EUR proračunskih sredstev; vendar ugotavlja, da so si razprave o tem načelu medsebojno nasprotovale; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja dejstvo, da je treba predložiti ustrezna dokazila za povračilo dodatnih stroškov, ki so nastali pri opravljanju takšnih dolžnosti;
Takes note of the Bureau's decision to introduce allowances for office holders with a budgetary impact of EUR 400 000; notes, however, that the discussion on the principle was controversial; in this regard welcomes the fact that supporting documents have to be provided in order to be reimbursed for extra costs incurred in the performance of their duties;
se je seznanil s predlogom predsedstva o vnosu 2,5 milijona EUR za Hišo evropske zgodovine za študije na podlagi rezultatov natečaja arhitektov, ki se ravnokar ocenjuje; spominja na zahtevo iz prejšnjega leta, da pričakuje jasen pregled stroškov, predvidenih za celoten projekt, vključno z upravnimi stroški, najkasneje v predhodnem osnutku načrta prihodkov in odhodkov za proračunski postopek za leto 2011; poleg tega spominja na dogovor s predsedstvom, sklenjen na predhodnem usklajevalnem srečanju leta 2009; poudarja, da je v poročilu odbora strokovnjakov za Hišo evropske zgodovine 11 točk, ki predvidevajo dodatne stroške: (1)„organ akademskih svetovalcev, ki ga sestavljajo strokovnjaki in muzejski izvedenci“, (2) „institucionalna neodvisnost institucije“, (3) „široka muzejsko-pedagoška ponudba“, (4)„kraj za srečevanje mladih akademikov“, (5) stalno ocenjevanje„, (6) “začasno razstavljanje in potujoča razstava„, (7) “pomembni dogodki evropskega pomena„, (8) “lastne publikacije„, (9) “izčrpne ponudbe na spletu„, (10) “ustvarjanje lastne muzejske zbirke„, (11) “stalen razvoj razstav in infrastrukture muzeja„; zato poudarja, da je treba nujno opredeliti skupni strošek tega projekta;
Takes note of the Bureau's proposal to enter EUR 2,5 million for the House of European History, concerning studies following the results of the architect's competition currently under evaluation; recalls its request from last year to receive a clear overview of the costs envisaged for the project as a whole, including administrative costs, at the latest at the stage of the Preliminary draft estimates for the 2011 budget procedure; also recalls the agreement with the Bureau from the pre-conciliation meeting in 2009; highlights that the report of the Committee of experts to the House of European History lists 11 points, which entail further costs: (1)‘academic advisor composed of experts and museum specialists’, (2)‘institutional independence of the institution’, (3)‘extensive museum-pedagogic offers’, (3)‘meeting place for young academics’, (5)‘permanent evaluation’, (6)‘temporary exhibit and travelling exhibition’, (7)‘relevant events with a European reference’, (8)‘own publications’, (9)‘extensive on-line offers’, (10)‘Creation of an own museums collection’, (11)‘continuous development of exhibitions and the infrastructure of the museum’; therefore stresses that the global cost of this project must be identified as a matter of urgency;
toplo pozdravlja, da predlog proračuna vključuje začetno analizo, ki opredeljuje fiksne in spremenljive stroške; se zaveda metodoloških težav, povezanih s tem, vendar je prepričan, da je treba te pojme podrobneje preučiti; v zvezi s tem spominja, da pričakuje odgovor pristojnih organov, kako bi koncept ničelnega predračunavanja, ki razlikuje med fiksnimi in spremenljivimi stroški, lahko uporabili v proračunskem postopku Parlamenta; zahteva podrobnejšo analizo fiksnih stroškov, pri čemer bo opravljeno razlikovanje med stalnimi fiksnimi stroški, fiksnimi stroški za določeno obdobje in področji, kjer se lahko ustvarijo prihranki; zahteva, da se opravi podrobnejša analiza variabilnih stroškov, vzpostavi jasna povezava med stroški in cilji, politikami in ukrepi ter opredelijo in izberejo prednostne naloge na podlagi njihove pomembnosti;
Warmly welcomes the inclusion of an initial analysis identifying fixed and variable costs in the budget proposal; recognises the methodological difficulties involved but is convinced that these concepts should be examined further; in this regard, recalls that it is awaiting a reply from the competent bodies as to how the concept of a zero-based budget policy, utilising this distinction between fixed and variable costs, could be applied in the context of the Parliament's budget procedure; requests deeper examination regarding fixed costs, distinguishing permanent fixed costs, fixed costs for fixed terms and areas where savings could be generated; requests deeper examination regarding variable costs, making a clear link between costs and objectives, policies and actions, and identifying and sorting priorities by importance;
poudarja, da so pragovi za različne postopke javnih naročil za evropske institucije sedaj višji kot jih narekujejo zadevne evropske direktive o javnih naročilih in da zaradi tega nastajajo dodatni upravni stroški in se uporabljajo dodatni človeški viri, ki bi jih z boljšo uskladitvijo teh pragov lahko prihranili;
Points out that the thresholds for the different public procurement procedures are currently stricter for the European institutions than those stipulated in the relevant European public procurement directives and that this situation leads to additional administrative costs and use of human resources that could be saved by better aligning the thresholds;
podpira dejavnosti z družbeno, kulturno ali lingvistično razsežnostjo za osebje in njihove družine, vendar se ne strinja s posameznimi subvencijami, dodeljenimi v zvezi s tem, in zato spreminja pripombe k zadevni proračunski postavki;
Supports activities that have a social, cultural or linguistic dimension, for staff and their families, but disapproves of individual subsidies given in that context and consequently modifies the remarks to the relevant budget item;
močno podpira nadaljnja prizadevanja za to, da bi institucije postale bolj primerne za invalidne osebe tako kar zadeva potrebnih infrastrukturnih sprememb kot ukrepov, povezanih z osebjem;
Strongly supports further efforts to make the institution better suited for disabled persons, both as regards the necessary changes to infrastructure and staff measures;
poudarja, da je treba pred jesenskim glasovanjem o predlogu proračuna podrobneje preučiti posamezne proračunske postavke, vključno z analizo stopnje izvrševanja; zato bo opravil ta pregled in takrat sprejel dokončne proračunske odločitve;
Underlines that a more detailed examination of individual budget items, including an analysis of implementation rates, should take place before the vote on the draft budget in the autumn; will thus examine and take the final budgetary decisions at that time;
sprejme predložen načrt prihodkov in odhodkov za proračunsko leto 2011 in opominja, da bo Parlament sprejel stališče o predlogu proračuna, kot ga bo spremenil Svet, oktobra 2009, skladno s postopkom glasovanja, ki ga določa Pogodba;
Adopts the estimates for the financial year 2011 and recalls that the adoption of Parliament's position on the Draft budget, as modified by the Council, will take place in October 2010, according to the voting procedure laid down by the Treaty;
odobri priložene skupne sklepe tristranskega srečanja o proračunu z dne 25. marca 2010,
Approves the joint conclusions of the budgetary trilogue of 25 March 2010 annexed hereto;
naroča svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo ter načrt prihodkov in odhodkov posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the estimates to the Council and the Commission.
Predlagajo, naj se navedene institucije pozove, da svoje pripombe o vplivu stališča Sveta in sprememb Evropskega parlamenta pisno sporočijo neposredno spravnemu odboru.
They suggest that these institutions are invited to send directly in writing to the Conciliation Committee their remarks on the impact of the Council's position and the European Parliament's amendments.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. maja 2010 o poenostavitvi SKP ( 2009/2155(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 18 May 2010 on simplification of the CAP ( 2009/2155(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. oktobra 2005 o poenostavitvi in boljši ureditvi za skupno kmetijsko politiko ( KOM(2005)0509 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 October 2005 - Simplification and Better Regulation for the Common Agricultural Policy ( COM(2005)0509 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 18. marca 2009 z naslovom „Poenostavljena SKP za Evropo – Uspeh za vse“ ( KOM(2009)0128 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 18 March 2009 - A simplified CAP for Europe - a success for all ( COM(2009)0128 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0051/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0051/2010 ),
ker mora biti vsa zakonodaja sorazmerna z namenom in bi bilo treba pred njenim sprejetjem s celovito presojo vpliva oceniti finančno breme, ki bi ga prinesla ta zakonodaja, ter temeljito preučiti razmerje med stroški in koristmi,
whereas all legislation must be proportionate to the objective and should only be introduced after a full impact assessment analysing the financial burden which legislation would impose, and including a full cost benefit analysis, has been carried out,
ker bi morala poenostavitev najprej in predvsem koristiti kmetom, ne pa zgolj nacionalnim in plačilnim organom v državah članicah, kot je bilo pretežno opaženo,
whereas simplification should benefit farmers first and foremost and not only the national authorities and payment bodies in the Member States, as has been predominantly observed,
ker bi morala nova SKP kmetom omogočiti, da se osredotočijo na poglavitni cilj zagotoviti varno in kakovostno hrano, ki ji je mogoče slediti, in jih tudi podpirati pri zagotavljanju netržnih javnih dobrin,
whereas a new CAP should allow farmers to concentrate on the core objective of providing safe, quality and traceable food while also supporting them to deliver non-market public goods,
ker bi moral cilj biti zmanjšanje stroškov izvajanja skupne kmetijske politike ob hkratnem zmanjševanju upravnih obremenitev za proizvajalce Skupnosti, s čimer bi se kmetom omogočilo, da več časa obdelujejo svojo zemljo,
whereas the objective should be to reduce the implementation costs of the CAP while reducing the administrative burdens on Community producers, to enable farmers to spend more time working their land,
ker bi morala biti nova SKP trajno konkurenčna,
whereas a new CAP should be sustainably competitive,
ker je nujno treba zagotoviti jasno in razumljivo zakonodajo, ki pristojnim organom in kmetom zagotavlja pravno varnost, ter odpraviti nepotrebno zakonodajo,
whereas it is necessary to ensure clear and understandable legislation that provides legal certainty for competent authorities and farmers, and to eliminate unnecessary legislation,
ker je treba zagotoviti pravično razporeditev enotnega plačila na kmetijo,
whereas the distribution of the single farm payment should ensure fairness,
ker je delujoč pravni okvir nujen za reševanje pomembnih pravnih vprašanj v zvezi s SKP,
whereas a functional legal framework is necessary to manage the important legal issues involved in the CAP,
ker bi morala biti nova SKP bolj tržno usmerjena, v skladu z nedavnimi reformami skupne kmetijske politike, in se osredotočati na zmanjšanje čezmernega protekcionizma, hkrati pa obdržali razpoložljive instrumente za pomoč kmetom v času hude gospodarske negotovosti,
whereas a new CAP should be more market-orientated, in line with the recent reforms of the common agricultural policy, and focused on reducing excessive protectionism, while keeping the tools available to assist farmers in times of severe economic volatility,
ker mora nova SKP biti enostavnejša in bolj odzivna,
whereas the new CAP should be more simple and responsive,
ker je potrebna prožnejša zakonodaja, da bo mogoče SKP prilagajati ter upoštevati posebnosti posameznih regij in ozemelj, ne da bi se pri tem ogrozil skupni značaj SKP,
whereas legislation should be more flexible, in order to make the CAP adapt to recognise specific regions and territories, without jeopardising the common character of the CAP,
ker bi bilo treba spodbujati izmenjavo dobre prakse med državami članicami in lokalnimi oblastmi,
whereas the exchange of good practice should be promoted among Member States and local authorities,
ker ima skupna kmetijska politika osrednje mesto v EU-27 pri zagotavljanju zadostne oskrbe z varno hrano, poleg tega pa tudi odgovarja na izzive, kot so ohranjanje podeželja, gorskih območij in območij z omejenimi možnostmi, najbolj oddaljenih območij ter multifunkcionalnosti evropskega kmetijstva;
whereas the common agricultural policy is of central importance in the EU-27 as a means not only of ensuring an adequate supply of safe food but also of continuing to respond to such challenges as the conservation of rural areas, mountain regions, disadvantaged areas, extremely peripheral areas and the multifunctionality of European agriculture,
poudarja, da bi moral biti namen SKP uskladiti zakonodajo in odpraviti podvajanje; prav tako poziva Komisijo, naj pri uvajanju novih predpisov hkrati poskuša odpraviti nepotrebne obremenitve;
Emphasises that the CAP should seek to harmonise regulation by removing duplication; also asks the Commission, when introducing new regulation, to simultaneously seek to remove unnecessary burdens;
poziva Komisijo, naj ima redna in obsežna posvetovanja z interesnimi skupinami v kmetijstvu, saj bo tako mogoče bolje oceniti učinek predpisov na kraju samem ter opredeliti praktična, enostavna in pregledna pravila za kmete;
Urges the Commission to consult widely and regularly with agricultural stakeholders in order to better assess the impact of regulation on the ground, and to identify practical, simple and transparent rules for farmers;