natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije: "Dokument o posvetovanju o državni pomoči za inovacije" ( KOM(2005)0436 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication, "Consultation Document on State aid for Innovation" ( COM(2005)0436 ),
ob upoštevanju Odločbe Komisije 2005/842/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o uporabi člena 86(2) Pogodbe za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestila za javne storitve, dodeljene določenim podjetjem, pooblaščenim za opravljanje storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str.
having regard to Commission Decision 2005/842/EC of 28 November 2005 on the application of Article 86(2) of the Treaty to State aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive Komisije 2005/81/ES z dne 28. novembra 2005 o spremembah Direktive 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji ter o finančni preglednosti v nekaterih podjetjih UL L 312, 29.11.2005, str.
having regard to Commission Directive 2005/81/EC of 28 November 2005 amending Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings OJ L 312, 29.11.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o okviru Skupnosti za državne pomoči v obliki nadomestil za javne storitve v različici, kakor je bila za pripravo mnenja posredovana Parlamentu dne 8. septembra 2004,
having regard to the Commission's working paper on a Community framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation, in the version as forwarded to the Parliament for an opinion on 8 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju osnutka sporočila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2005 "o smernicah za državno regionalno pomoč v obdobju 2007-2013",
having regard to the Commission's draft communication of 21 December 2005, "Guidelines on National Regional Aid for 2007-2013",
ob upoštevanju ciljev lizbonske strategije,
having regard to the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy,
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Barceloni z dne 15. in 16. marca 2002 ter v Göteborgu z dne 15. in 16. junija 2001, in zlasti določb, s katerimi so države članice sporazumno sklenile zmanjšati državno pomoč v EU in jo nameniti horizontalnim ciljem skupnega interesa,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of the Barcelona European Council of 15 and 16 March 2002 and the Gothenburg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001, and in particular the provisions under which the Member States agreed to reduce the level of State aid in the EU and to redirect it towards horizontal objectives of common interest,
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih resolucij o storitvah splošnega pomena, še zlasti resolucij z dne 17. decembra 1997 o sporočilu Komisije o storitvah splošnega pomena v Evropi UL C 14, 19.1.1998, str.
having regard to its previous resolutions on services of general interest, in particular to that of 17 December 1997 on the Commission communication on services of general interest in Europe OJ C 14, 19.1.1998, p.
, z dne 18. maja 2000 o osnutku direktive o spremembah Direktive Komisije 80/723/EGS o preglednosti finančnih odnosov med državami članicami in javnimi podjetji UL C 59, 23.2.2001, str.
, that of 18 May 2000 on the draft directive amending Commission Directive 80/723/EEC on the transparency of financial relations between Member States and public undertakings OJ C 59, 23.2.2001, p.
, z dne 13. novembra 2001 o sporočilu Komisije "Storitve splošnega pomena v Evropi" UL C 140 E, 13.6.2002, str.
, that of 13 November 2001 on the Commission communication 'Services of General Interest in Europe' OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p.
, z dne 14. januarja 2004 o zeleni knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
, that of 14 January 2004 on the Green Paper on services of general interest OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
in z dne 22. februarja 2005 o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil javnih storitev UL C 304 E, 1.12.2005, str.
, and that of 22 February 2005 on State aid in the form of public service compensation OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 69/2001 z dne 12. januarja 2001 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe ES pri
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 69/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to
pomoči UL L 10, 13.1.2001, str.
aid OJ L 10, 13.1.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju členov I-3, I-5, II-96, III-122, III-166, III-167 in III-238 Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo, ki so jo države članice podpisale dne 29. oktobra 2004 v Rimu,
having regard to Articles I-3, I-5, II-96, III-122, III-166, III-167 and III-238 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, as signed by Member States in Rome on 29 October 2004,
ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča v zvezi s storitvami splošnega pomena, še zlasti sodbe Evropskega sodišča z dne 24. julija 2003 v zadevi C-280/00, Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v.
having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities relating to services of general interest, and in particular to its judgment of 24 July 2003 in Case C-280/00,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0009/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0009/2006 ),
ker bi morala biti državna pomoč preprosta, transparentna in učinkovita,
whereas State aid provisions should be simple, transparent and effective,
ker je tržno gospodarstvo najučinkovitejši način razporejanja omejenih sredstev, ker bi morala biti zato državna pomoč "skrajno sredstvo",
whereas the market economy is the most efficient way of allocating limited resources; whereas State aid should therefore be an instrument of last resort,
ker bi morali biti cilji državne pomoči vedno jasno opredeljeni, pomoč pa sorazmerna in predvsem začasna,
whereas State aid should always have clearly defined objectives, be proportionate and, in particular, be granted on a temporary basis,
ker je lahko državna pomoč potrebna pri doseganju ciljev evropske konkurenčnosti ali tehnološke neodvisnosti v okviru projektov skupnega evropskega interesa na podlagi člena 87(3)(b) Pogodbe ES,
whereas State aid can be necessary in pursuing the objectives of European competitiveness or technological independence in the context of projects of common European interest under Article 87(3)(b) of the EC Treaty,
ker skupni letni znesek državne pomoči v EU tudi po najskromnejših ocenah presega 50% letnega proračuna EU, ker se obseg državne pomoči v razmerju do BDP po državah članicah bistveno razlikuje, - in se je gibal od 0,10% do 2,76% v letu 2003 - kar lahko povzroči precejšnje izkrivljanje trga,
whereas the total amount of State aid granted each year in the EU is the equivalent of more than 50% of the EU's annual budget even by the most conservative estimates; whereas the amount of State aid, as a proportion of GDP, varies substantially between Member States - and ranged from 0,10% to 2,76% in 2003 - potentially causing considerable market distortion,
ker so vir državne pomoči davkoplačevalci in jo je zato treba porabiti odgovorno in stroškovno visoko učinkovito,
whereas State aid is funded by taxpayers and must therefore be spent responsibly, providing high cost-effectiveness,
ker je treba utemeljitve za upravičenost do državne pomoči pregledovati redno in v ustreznih časovnih intervalih, ker se redno spremljanje in revizija porabe državne pomoči ne bi smeli prenesti na nacionalne urade držav članic za revizijo,
whereas the justification for granting State aid should be reviewed at regular and appropriate intervals; whereas the task of regularly monitoring and auditing the use of State aid should not be delegated to the national audit offices of the Member States,
ker je učinkovit in strog nadzor nad dodeljevanjem državne pomoči potreben za zagotavljanje poštene konkurence in transparentnosti ter preprečevanje diskriminacije,
whereas effective and stringent controls over the grant of State aid are required in order to ensure fair competition and transparency and in order to avoid discrimination,
ker bi se morala Komisija pri uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti osredotočiti na kršitve, ki imajo velik vpliv na notranji trg, saj je, kakor določa člen 87 Pogodbe, državna pomoč nezdružljiva s skupnim trgom le "kolikor prizadene trgovino med državami članicami...",
whereas, when applying the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, the Commission should focus on infringements with a significant impact on the internal market, because State aid is incompatible with the common market pursuant to Article 87 of the Treaty only in so far as it affects trade between Member States,
ker je učinkovitost nadzora nad državno pomočjo odvisna od boljše obveščenosti vpletenih strani o njenih posledicah zanje,
whereas the effectiveness of State aid control policy depends on better information regarding its implications for the parties concerned,
ker lahko koristi državne pomoči bistveno presegajo stroške, če se državna pomoč uporablja racionalno in na podlagi opravljenih analiz stroškov in koristi,
whereas the benefits of State aid can considerably exceed its costs when aid is used rationally and when thorough cost-benefit analyses are conducted,
ker v državah članicah ne obstaja mehanizem za spremljanje, ki bi bil primerljiv z nadzorom nad pomočjo na ravni Skupnosti,
whereas no monitoring mechanism comparable to Community-level aid supervision exists within the Member States,
ker se Parlament v svojih prejšnjih resolucijah o državni pomoči in v rednih razpravah, ki potekajo s predstavniki Komisije v Odboru za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, vedno znova zavzema za ukrepe, ki bi zagotovili večjo transparentnost,
whereas the Parliament, in its previous resolutions on State aid and in its regular debates with Commission representatives within the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, has repeatedly insisted on measures to ensure more transparency,
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da posodobi prakso in postopke državne pomoči, kakor je predvidela v akcijskem načrtu državnih pomoči, zlasti s povečanjem pravne varnosti, izboljšanjem gospodarskega pristopa, povečanjem preglednosti s posvetovanjem z interesnimi skupinami in z izboljšanjem postopka presoje;
Welcomes the Commission's intention, outlined in the SAAP, to modernise the practices and procedures regarding State aid, in particular by increasing legal certainty, refining the economic approach, increasing transparency by consulting stakeholders and enhancing the adjudication process;
se strinja s Komisijo, da je obsežna reforma politike državne pomoči nujno potrebna;
Agrees with the Commission that there is a real need for a comprehensive reform of State aid policy;
ugotavlja, da je politika državne pomoči sestavni del konkurenčne politike in da nadzor državne pomoči odraža potrebo po ohranjanju enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vsa podjetja, ki delujejo na enotnem evropskem trgu; vendar pa poudarja, da je v skladu s členom 87 Pogodbe državna pomoč lahko uporabljena za doseganje ciljev EU, zlasti tistih iz člena 2 Pogodbe;
Notes that State aid policy is an integral part of competition policy and that State aid control reflects the need to maintain a level playing field for all undertakings carrying out activities in the single European market; stresses, however, that, in accordance with Article 87 of the Treaty, State aid can also help to achieve other EU objectives, in particular those referred to in Article 2 of the Treaty;
ugotavlja, da člena 86 in 87 Pogodbe izrecno dovoljujeta izjeme v zvezi s splošno prepovedjo državnih pomoči, če imajo predlagane ureditve pomoči jasno opredeljene ugodne učinke na prebivalstvo in okolje ter pomoč ne škoduje splošnim dejavnostim EU; zato meni, da je pri ugotavljanju združljivosti državne pomoči s Pogodbo bistveno, da se najde pravo ravnotežje med negativnimi učinki državne pomoči na konkurenco in njenimi pozitivnimi učinki v splošnem interesu Skupnosti;
Notes that Articles 86 and 87 of the Treaty expressly authorises certain exceptions to the general prohibition of State aid, when the aid regimes proposed have clearly defined beneficial effects for the population and the environment and the aid does not harm the general activities of the EU; considers it essential, therefore, that when assessing whether State aid is compatible with the Treaty, the right balance is struck between the negative effects of State aid on competition and its positive effects on the common Community interest;
poudarja, da bi morale biti odločbe Komisije usklajene z upoštevnimi sodbami Sodišča, da se prepreči pravna negotovost; meni, da morajo akcijske načrte državnih pomoči po potrebi spremljati zakonodajne pobude, usmerjene v reformo državne pomoči v skladu s smernicami EU in izboljšanje pravne varnosti;
Stresses that, in order to remove legal uncertainty, the Commission's decisions should be closely in line with relevant judgments of the Court of Justice; considers that the SAAP should be accompanied, where necessary, by legislative initiatives aiming to reform State aid along the lines called for by the EU and to enhance legal certainty;
predlaga, naj Komisija čim bolj dosledno objavlja smernice za razlage sodb Sodišča o pravilih državne pomoči, če te temeljijo na določbah Pogodbe ali pa na določbah sekundarne zakonodaje;
Suggests that the Commission should publish, as consistently as possible, interpretative guidelines on Court of Justice judgments on State aid rules, whether these are based on Treaty provisions or on provisions contained in secondary legislation;
poudarja, da je treba upoštevati posledice tako neuspešnega dodeljevanja državne pomoči v preteklosti kakor tudi primere, v katerih se je državna pomoč izkazala kot učinkovit instrument za doseganje zastavljenih ciljev; poudarja, da bi bilo treba ukiniti državno pomoč, ki izkrivlja konkurenco;
Stresses the need to draw the consequences both of the unsuccessful grant of State aid in the past and of those cases in which this has proved to be an effective instrument for achieving the objectives pursued; stresses that State aid that distorts competition should be abolished;
želi, da bi Komisija objavila letno poročilo za Parlament in Svet o državni pomoči, ki je bila dodeljena v državah članicah;
Expresses the wish that the Commission publish an annual report addressed to the Parliament and the Council on State aid granted in the Member States;
poziva Komisijo, da v zvezi s tem uvede stroga pravila poročanja tako za države članice kakor za upravičence; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju navedenega spremeni preglednico državne pomoči s kazalniki;
Asks the Commission, in this context, to apply stringent reporting rules, covering Member State as well as beneficiaries; asks the Commission, furthermore, to modify the State Aid Scoreboard with this in mind;
meni, da je v današnjem svetovnem gospodarstvu bistveno, da pravila, sprejeta na ravni Skupnosti, upoštevajo pogoje mednarodne konkurence;
Considers that in today's global economy it is essential that rules laid down at Community level should take into account the conditions of international competition;
poziva Komisijo, naj preveri, ali najvišja mogoča stopnja pomoči, ki načeloma lahko znaša do 50 %, ni previsoka s stališča tržnega gospodarstva, saj tako visoke stopnje pomoči omogočajo ustanovitev podjetja, ki nima lastnega kapitala, kar je v nasprotju z načelom podjetniške odgovornosti v tržnem gospodarstvu;
Calls on the Commission to check whether the maximum aid rates of up to 50%, which are possible in principle, do not appear too high from the point of view of the market economy, since with such high aid rates a company can be set up without its own capital, which is contrary to the principle of entrepreneurial responsibility in a market economy;
pozdravlja izjavo Komisije v akcijskem načrtu državnih pomoči, da so ključni cilji Skupnosti visoka stopnja zaposlenosti, trajnostna rast ter gospodarska in družbena kohezija;
Welcomes the Commission's statement in the SAAP that the key objectives of the Community include a high level of employment, sustainable growth and economic and social cohesion;
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da izboljša svoj gospodarski pristop k postopkom državne pomoči in se ob upoštevanju ciljev lizbonske in göteborške strategije usmeri predvsem v primere, ki utegnejo povzročiti resno izkrivljanje konkurence in trgovine;
Welcomes the Commission's aim of refining its economic approach to State aid proceedings and focusing its resources on cases that are likely to create the most serious distortions to competition and trade, with regard to the objectives of the Lisbon and Gothenburg strategies;
poziva k natančni opredelitvi gospodarskega pristopa Komisije, da bi povečali pravno varnost za vpletene strani; zato meni, da bi morala ekonomska analiza Komisije temeljiti na opredeljenih merilih, ki izhajajo iz veljavnih postopkov na drugih področjih konkurenčnega prava, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti, da postopki ne postanejo preveč ovirajoči;
Calls for the Commission's economic approach to be defined strictly, in order to increase legal certainty for the parties involved; considers, therefore, that the Commission's economic analysis should be based on defined criteria derived from the procedures in force in other areas of competition law, while ensuring that the procedures are not too cumbersome;
poziva Komisijo, naj v vse svoje odločbe vključi gospodarsko analizo obeh meril za presojanje nezakonite pomoči iz člena 87(1) Pogodbe (pomoči, ki izkrivlja ali bi lahko izkrivljala konkurenco po eni strani in prizadela trgovino med državami članicami po drugi); poziva Komisijo, naj svoj pristop do obeh meril potrdi in pojasni v posebnih smernicah;
Urges the Commission to subject both criteria for assessing illegal aid, as provided in Article 87(1) of the Treaty - the distortion or threat of distortion of competition on the one hand, and the effects on trade between Member States on the other - to economic analysis in all its decisions; asks the Commission to confirm and specify its approach for both criteria in specific guidelines;
upošteva pobudo podpredsednika Komisije Siima Kallasa za večjo transparentnost v postopku podeljevanja kmetijskih subvencij, po kateri bi morale države članice identiteto vseh upravičencev in tudi zneske dodeljenih pomoči objaviti na internetu, ter uvedbo takšne rešitve priporoča za vse državne subvencije; priporoča državam članicam, da zahtevajo od podjetij objavo podatkov o prejetih subvencijah, da bi se delničarjem omogočilo bolje oceniti njihovo resnično poslovno uspešnost, zlasti če bi se državne subvencije nato zmanjšale;
Notes the initiative by Commission Vice-President Siim Kallas to introduce more transparency into the procedure for granting agricultural subsidies, which would require Member States to publish the identity of beneficiaries and the amount of aid granted on the Internet; recommends that that scheme be extended to all State subsidies; also recommends that Member States require companies to publish details of aid received in order to enable shareholders better to evaluate the real performance of the company, in particular in the event that the aid may subsequently be cut;
opozarja na morebitno škodljivo vlogo tako nacionalne kakor evropske državne pomoči, če ta spodbudi selitve potencialnih podjetij - upravičencev med državami članicami zaradi tekmovanja podjetij za subvencije, ne da bi to pomenilo resnično korist za skupne cilje EU;
Warns against the potentially harmful role of both national and European State aid in motivating the relocation of potential beneficiary undertakings between Member States, due to "subsidy-shopping" by enterprises, without any real benefit to the common goals of the EU;
poudarja velik pomen inovacij, razvoja in raziskav za prihodnjo konkurenčnost EU v svetovnem gospodarstvu;
Stresses the high importance of innovation and R&D to the future competitiveness of the EU in a global economy;
poudarja, da je treba državno pomoč za raziskave in razvoj oceniti z vidika lizbonskih ciljev in da tovrstna pomoč lahko omogoči državam članicam tako osredotočanje na tržne nepopolnosti, kakor tudi pripravo ukrepov, ki bodo spodbudili industrijo, da bo investirala več v raziskave in razvoj; vendar poudarja, da pomoč za razvoj in raziskave ne sme povzročati izkrivljanja konkurence, zlasti če omogoča prednost že uveljavljenim udeležencem na trgu; v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po preseganju regulatornih in davčnih ovir v državah članicah, ki zavirajo razvoj mladih in inovativnih podjetij;
Stresses that State aid for R&D should be evaluated in the light of the Lisbon objectives and that such aid can enable Member States both to target market failures and to draw up measures giving industry an incentive to invest more in R&D; underlines, nevertheless, that aid for R&D must not give rise to aid that distorts competition, especially by favouring established market players; stresses in this context the need to overcome regulatory and fiscal barriers in Member States that hamper the development of young and innovative businesses;
ugotavlja, da je znatna državna pomoč, namenjena fosilnim gorivom in jedrski energiji, ovirala razvoj okoljskih tehnologij v EU, zlasti v energetskem sektorju; trdno verjame v načelo, da je treba zunanje stroške vključiti v ceno energije iz različnih virov ter da mora biti to načelo temelj pregleda smernic EU o državni pomoči;
Notes that the development of environmental technologies in the EU, notably in the energy sector, has been hampered by significant State aids for fossil fuels and nuclear power; strongly believes in the principle that external costs should be included in the price of energy from different sources and that this principle should be a basis for the revision of the EU's State aid guidelines;
podpira prilagodljivost državne pomoči pri ustvarjanju in spodbujanju inovativnih zamisli v raziskovalnih ustanovah v javnem sektorju in na univerzah, pa tudi jasna in preprosta pravila za prenos takšnih zamisli in strokovnega znanja v gospodarstvo; v zvezi s tem podpira razvoj novih inovacij z javno-zasebnim sodelovanjem in partnerstvi;
Is very supportive of State aid flexibility concerning the creation and promotion of innovative ideas in public sector research bodies and universities, as well as clear and simple rules on how to transfer such ideas and expertise to businesses; in this regard, supports the generation of further innovation through public-private collaboration and partnerships;
poudarja načelo, da se pri dodeljevanju pomoči za raziskave in razvoj ne bi smelo dajati prednosti posameznim podjetjem; poziva Komisijo, da pomoč za raziskave in razvoj nameni predvsem inovacijskim skupinam;
Stresses the principle that aid for R&D should not favour individual undertakings; urges the Commission to aim aid for R&D at innovation clusters;
podpira namen Komisije, da naredi sistem državne pomoči bolj prilagodljiv in tako spodbuja inovacijske procese sorazmerno z njihovo oddaljenostjo od trga;
Supports the Commission's intention to make the State aid system more flexible with a view to supporting innovation processes in a way that is proportionate to their remoteness from the market;
Rizični kapital
Risk capital
ocenjuje, da zaradi pomanjkljive zakonodaje in davčnih sistemov, ki ne spodbujajo podjetništva, v nekaterih državah članicah rizični kapital ni dovolj dostopen, zlasti ne za mala podjetja, zato odobrava potekajoči pregled sporočila Komisije o državni pomoči in rizičnem kapitalu UL C 235, 21.8.2001, str.
Considers that, due to regulatory insufficiencies and incentive-poor tax systems in some Member States, the provision of risk capital, in particular to small businesses, is not optimal; welcomes, therefore, the Commission's ongoing revision of its communication on State aid and risk capital OJ C 235, 21.8.2001, p.
, ki poteče v avgustu 2006;
, which is due to expire in August 2006;