natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
13. ponovno poziva države članice, naj opravijo sistematičen varnostni in obrambni pregled v skladu s skupnimi merili in usklajenim časovnim načrtom; predlaga, da bi to lahko postalo redna praksa, povezana s proračunskimi postopki, neke vrste „evropski semester“ varnostnih in obrambnih pregledov;
Reiterates its call on the Member States to conduct systematic security and defence reviews in accordance with common criteria and a harmonised timetable; suggests that this could be developed into a regular exercise which is linked to budgetary procedures – a sort of ‘European semester’ of security and defence reviews;
17. je mnenja, da bi morale države članice kot naslednji korak organizirati skupna posvetovanja, da bi uskladile svoje vojaške potrebe in preučile vse možnosti za večjo stroškovno učinkovitost s pomočjo dogovorov na ravni EU ter regijskih, dvostranskih in drugih dogovorov;
Takes the view that, as the next step, the Member States should go through a process of mutual consultations in order to harmonise their military requirements and examine all options for increasing cost-efficiency through EU-level, regional, bilateral or other arrangements;
(B) Združevanje in skupno izkoriščanje zmogljivosti
( B) Pooling and sharing of capabilities
23. prvič, glede skupnega lastništva poziva države članice, naj preučijo možnosti skupne nabave nekatere opreme z namenskim združevanjem sodelujočih držav ali celo preko EU, pri čemer naj se zgledujejo po pobudah, kot so zmogljivosti strateškega zračnega prevoza, ki poteka v Natu, Natov program AWACS ali program EU Galileo, ali raziščejo možnosti, da bi EU financirala ali sofinancirala opremo, ki jo nabavi namensko združenje držav članic; poudarja možnost skupnega lastništva za najdražjo opremo, kot so vesoljske zmogljivosti, brezpilotna letala ali strateška transportna letala;
First, on ‘joint ownership’, calls on the Member States to explore the possibilities for certain equipment to be jointly acquired by consortia of participating countries or by the EU itself, taking inspiration from initiatives such as the Strategic Airlift Capability implemented under NATO, the NATO AWACS programme or the EU's Galileo, or to search for possibilities of EU funding or co-funding of equipment acquired by consortia of Member States; stresses the potential of joint ownership for the most expensive equipment, such as for space capabilities, UAVs or strategic transport aircraft;
30. pozdravlja Natovo pobudo pametne obrambe „Smart Defence“ in potrjuje pomen stalnega usklajevanja in odprave nasprotij med EU in Natom na vseh ravneh, da ne bi prihajalo do nepotrebnega podvajanja; poudarja, da je okrepitev praktičnega sodelovanja EU-NATO, zlasti v zvezi z odzivi na izzive finančne krize, nujna; poziva zlasti Evropsko obrambno agencijo in Zavezniško poveljstvo za preoblikovanje, naj tesno sodelujeta, tako da se bodo projekti združevanja in skupnega izkoriščanja obeh organizacij dopolnjevali in se bodo vedno izvajali v okviru, ki bo prinesel največjo dodano vrednost;
Welcomes the ‘Smart Defence’ initiative within NATO and reaffirms the importance of continuous coordination and deconfliction between the EU and NATO at all levels to avoid unnecessary duplication; stresses that an intensification of EU-NATO practical cooperation, in particular concerning the responses to the challenges of the financial crisis, is a must; calls in particular on the EDA and the Allied Command Transformation to cooperate closely to make sure that pooling and sharing projects of both organisations are complementary and are always implemented in the framework with the most added value;
(C) Podpora obrambnih raziskav in tehnološkega razvoja
( C) Supporting defence research and technological development
38. vendar poudarja, da se nobena sredstva ne smejo prenesti iz civilnih raziskav in da bi morale biti vse obrambne raziskovalne dejavnosti, ki jih financira EU, namenjene zlasti razvoju zmogljivosti EU za krizno upravljanje in se osredotočiti na raziskave z dvojno uporabo;
Stresses, however, that no resources must be transferred from civilian research and that any EU-funded defence research activity should first of all follow the objective of the development of EU crisis management capabilities and focus on research with dual applications;
40. opozarja na določbo člena 185 PDEU, ki dovoljuje prispevek EU k obstoječim raziskovalnim in razvojnim programom, ki jih izvaja skupina držav članic; meni, da bi bilo mogoče raziskati možnost uporabe tega člena za pospešitev razvoja zmogljivosti za misije in operacije SVOP;
Points out the provision of Article 185 TFEU allowing an EU contribution to existing research and development programmes undertaken by a group of Member States; believes that the possibility could be explored of using this article to speed up the development of capabilities needed for CSDP missions and operations;
(D) Oblikovanje baze evropske obrambne industrije in tehnologije
( D) Building a European defence technological and industrial base
43. meni, da bi uskladitev vojaških potreb na podlagi procesa usklajenih varnostnih in obrambnih pregledov, kot opisuje točka (A), morala voditi do usklajene nabave opreme med državami članicami EU, kar je temeljni pogoj, da se na strani povpraševanja ustvarijo razmere, ki bodo omogočile uspešno čeznacionalno prestrukturiranje obrambne industrije v Evropi;
Considers that a harmonisation of military requirements, through a process of coordinated security and defence reviews as described under (A), should lead to a harmonisation of equipment acquisition among the EU Member States, which is the first prerequisite for creating conditions on the demand side for a successful transnational restructuring of the defence industry in Europe;
46. kar zadeva prestrukturiranje industrije, poudarja tudi, da je pomembno poskrbeti za to, da se ne ogrozi zanesljive oskrbe; poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj hitro oblikujejo celosten in ambiciozen sistem zanesljivosti oskrbe za celo EU, ki bo temeljil na sistemu vzajemnih jamstev; poziva države članice, naj kot prvi korak k izpolnitvi tega cilja v celoti izkoristijo možnosti direktive o prenosih in pospešijo delo za začetek delovanja okvirnega dogovora za zanesljivost oskrbe v primerih operativne nujnosti iz leta 2006;
In the context of industry restructuring, highlights also the importance of ensuring that security of supply is not put at risk; calls on the Member States and the Commission to rapidly develop a comprehensive and ambitious EU-wide security-of-supply regime based on a system of mutual guarantees; urges the Member States, as first steps towards this objective, to fully exploit the potential of the Directive on transfers and to speed up work to operationalise the 2006 Framework Arrangement for Security of Supply in Circumstances of Operational Urgency;
49. poziva države članice, naj v programih skupne oborožitve ne sklepajo togih sporazumov o delitvi dela, saj ugotavlja, da ima načelo „pravičnega vračila“ negativne učinke v obliki neučinkovite porazdelitve dela, počasnejšega izvajanja in višjih stroškov; poziva, naj se načelo „pravičnega vračila“ nadomesti z veliko prilagodljivejšim pojmom splošnega ravnovesja, ki dopušča učinkovito konkurenco pri izbiri pogodbenikov po vsej EU, pod pogojem, da je doseženo minimalno ravnovesje, ki malim in srednjim podjetjem zagotavlja enake konkurenčne pogoje kot velikim podjetjem; odobrava, da uporablja Evropska obrambna agencija načelo splošnega ravnovesja v skupnem naložbenem programu za zaščito sil, in agencijo poziva, naj ta koncept razširi na celoten spekter svojih dejavnosti, pri čemer naj bo končni cilj zagotovitev enakih pogojev za vse na evropskem trgu obrambne opreme in upoštevanje interesov malih in srednjih podjetij,
Urges the Member States to avoid rigid work-share agreements in joint armaments programmes, noting the adverse effects of the principle of ‘juste retour’ in terms of inefficient work distribution, leading to slower implementation and higher costs; calls for the ‘juste retour’ principle to be replaced with a much more flexible concept of ‘global balance’, which allows effective EU-wide competition for the selection of contractors, provided that a minimum balance is achieved in order to ensure that small and medium‑sized enterprises can compete on an equal footing with large enterprises; welcomes the fact that ‘global balance’ is used in the EDA’s joint investment programme on force protection, and calls on the Agency to implement this concept over the whole spectrum of its activities, with the final aim of complying with the level playing field within the European defence equipment market and taking account of the interests of small and medium enterprises;
(E) Oblikovanje evropskega trga obrambne opreme
( E) Establishing a European defence equipment market
56. meni, da bi se moral skladno s potekajočimi prizadevanji za posodobitev in racionalizacijo celotnega evropskega okvira javnih naročil, cilji poenostavitve upravnih postopkov in zmanjšanja bremena odražati v praktični uporabi direktive in da je treba pregledati nekompatibilne ali nesorazmerne tehnične zahteve, ki ovirajo notranji trg, da bi tako omogočali čezmejne javne razpise; poleg tega opozarja, da morebitni podizvajalci ne bi smeli biti diskriminirani na podlagi narodnosti.
Stresses that, in line with the on-going efforts aimed at modernising and streamlining the overall European public procurement framework, the objectives of administrative simplification and burden reduction should be reflected in the practical application of the directive, and that, in order to facilitate cross-border tendering, there is a need to review incompatible or disproportionate technical requirements that constitute barriers to the internal market; recalls, furthermore, that potential subcontractors should not be discriminated against on the grounds of nationality;
59. poudarja, da so zahteve glede protidobav načeloma lahko upravičena le, če so potrebne za zaščito bistvenih varnostnih interesov skladno s členom 346 PDEU, in da bi morale biti skladne z načeli preglednosti ter da zlasti ne smejo povzročati nevarnosti korupcije ali motenj delovanja evropskega trga obrambne opreme;
Stresses that offset requirements can in principle only be justified if they are necessary for the protection of essential security interests in accordance with Article 346 TFEU, and that they should be consistent with the principles of transparency and must especially not cause risks of corruption or disrupt the functioning of the European defence equipment market;
63. spominja, da upravno breme obveznosti izdaje licenc v trgovini z obrambnimi proizvodi znotraj EU zavira konsolidacijo industrije in je glavna ovira za čeznacionalne programe sodelovanja v oborožitvi; spominja, da se je rok za prenos direktive 2009/43/ES o prenosu obrambnih proizvodov znotraj EU iztekel 30. junija 2011 in da za države članice od 30. junija 2012 veljajo nova pravila; poziva Komisijo, naj pravočasno poroča o ukrepih držav članic za prenos te direktive in naj ukrene vse, kar je potrebno za zagotovitev njenega pravilnega izvajanja;
Recalls that the administrative burden of licensing obligations in intra-EU trade in defence products has had an inhibiting effect on industry consolidation and has been a major obstacle to transnational collaborative armaments programmes; recalls that the deadline for the transposition of Directive 2009/43/EC on transfers of defence-related products within the EU expired on 30 June 2011 and that the Member States are required to apply the new rules from 30 June 2012; calls on the Commission to report in due time on the transposition measures taken by the Member States, and to take all necessary action to ensure correct implementation;
68. poudarja, da morata biti zgoraj omenjena standardizacija in konsolidacija del procesa, ki ga vodi EU in ne industrija, tako da se bodo upoštevali evropski interesi in dejanske potrebe družbe, ter da mora biti sodelovanje pri skupnih programih in sinergijah EU načeloma odprto za vse države članice;
Stresses that the above mentioned standardisation and consolidation should be part of an EU- and not an industry-driven process to the benefit of the European interests and the real needs of the society, and that participation in common EU programmes and synergies should be - in principle - open to all Member States;
69. je prepričan, da je treba zlasti ob sprejemanju novega večletnega finančnega okvira razmisliti o možnostih, da bi s proračunom EU državam članicam pomagali izpolniti cilje skupne varnostne in obrambne politike na stroškovno učinkovitejši način;
Is convinced that, especially in the context of the adoption of the new Multiannual Financial Framework, reflection needs to be undertaken on the possibilities for the EU budget to assist the Member States in achieving the goals of the Common Security and Defence Policy in a more cost-efficient way;
76. poudarja, da je Satelitski center EU, ki deluje s skromnim proračunom, dokazal svojo učinkovitost in dodano vrednost pri različnih varnostnih in obrambnih operacijah; opozarja na vedno večjo potrebo po satelitskem zajemanju slik, zlasti po nedavnih dogodkih v severni Afriki; poziva države članice, naj centru zagotovijo večji proračun, ter meni, zlasti glede na njegovo civilno-vojaško uporabo, da bi ga bilo treba financirati iz proračuna EU;
Points out that the EU Satellite Centre, operating with a modest budget, has demonstrated its efficiency and added value throughout a variety of security and defence operations; recalls the growing demand for satellite imagery, including in the wake of the recent events in Northern Africa; calls on the Member States to provide the Centre with a more important budget, and, given in particular its civil-military uses, takes the view that it should be funded from the EU budget;
78. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje visoki predstavnici/podpredsednici, Svetu, Komisiji, parlamentom držav članic EU, parlamentarni skupščini Nata, in generalnemu sekretarju Nata.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the High Representative/Vice-President, the Council, the Commission, the Parliaments of the EU Member States, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and the Secretary-General of NATO.
o poročilu o vplivu finančne krize na obrambne sektorje držav članic EU ( 2011/2177(INI) ),
on the report on the impact of the financial crisis on the defence sector in the EU Member States ( 2011/2177(INI) ),
Odbor za zunanje zadeve, poročevalec: Krzysztof Lisek
Committee on Foreign Affairs, Rapporteur: Krzysztof Lisek
Poročilo manjšine, ki ga vlagajo poslanci skupine GUE/NGL Sabine Lösing, Willy Meyer, Takis Hadjigeorgiou in Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis)
Minority Report tabled by GUE/NGL MEPs Sabine Lösing, WIlly Meyer, Takis Hadjigeorigiou, Nikolaos Chountis
Poročilo zagovarja nadaljnjo militarizacijo EU; spodbuja (vesoljsko) oboroževanje, povečanje naložb v varnostno, obrambno in vojaško raziskovanje in opremo kljub finančni in gospodarski krizi in vplivu na okolje; podpira vojaški industrijski kompleks in krepi intenzivno sodelovanje med EU in Natom, vključno z večjo delitvijo stroškov in „bremen”.
The report advocates further militarization of the EU; encourages (space -) armament, increased investment in security, defence and military research and equipment despite the financial and economical crises and environmental impact; it fosters the Military Industrial Complex and enhances an intensified EU-NATO cooperation including an increased cost and "burden-sharing".
- EU pretvarja v vojaškega svetovnega akterja na podlagi centralizacije in usklajevanja moči (Evropska obrambna agencija Evropske unije – operativno poveljstvo), pospeševanja oboroževanja in povečane porabe: tako med drugim podpira mehanizem ATHENA izven parlamentarnega nadzora;
- is shaping up the EU into a military global player, through centralisation and harmonisation of power (EDA EU-OHQ), boosting armament and increase spending: i.a. supports and promotes the ATHENA mechanism beyond parliamentary control
- gospodarsko krizo izkorišča kot izgovor za nadaljnji razvoj obrambne industrije in izsiljuje, češ, da bi zmanjšanje obrambnega proračuna lahko privedlo do večje brezposelnosti;
- uses the economic crisis as a pretext to further develop the defence industry, blackmails that defence cuts may lead to the increase of unemployment;
- podpira in spodbuja poglobljeno civilno-vojaško sodelovanje;
- supports and encourages further civil-military cooperation;
- zahteva liberalizacijo obrambnega trga, podpira ekonomske interese na področju proizvodnje orožja in vojaške opreme – vojaški industrijski kompleks
- demands the liberalisation of the defence market, fosters economic interests in the field of production of weapons and military equipment - MIC
- povečuje varnostne raziskave, zlasti za misije SVOP in mešanje civilnih varnostnih in vojaških raziskav.
- amplifies security research, in particular for CSDP missions and mixing of civilian security and military research
- korenito (jedrsko) razorožitev na ravni EU in na svetovni ravni;
- radical (nuclear-) disarmament on EU and global level;
- izvajanje vseh dejavnosti dosledno v skladu z ustanovno listino Združenih narodov in mednarodnim pravom,
- all activities strictly within UN Charter, International Law;
- civilno EU, strogo civilno mirno reševanje konfliktov in pristop k njim, ločitev civilnih in vojaških ukrepov;
- civilian EU, strict civil peaceful conflict solutions /approaches, separation of civil and military actions;
- strogo ločevanje EU od Nata.
- strict separation of EU from NATO.
Pripravljavec mnenja: Evžen Tošenovský
Rapporteur: Evžen Tošenovský
2. opozarja, da so za evropsko obrambno industrijo značilne različne nacionalne politike in programi, kar bi lahko poleg gospodarske in finančne krize še poslabšale negativne posledice za industrijo; poziva k nadaljnjemu razvoju obrambne politike EU, ki bo vodila do trdnega raziskovalnega, tehnološkega in industrijskega sodelovanja med državami članicami, da bi okrepili konkurenčnost in stabilnost obrambne industrije;
Underlines that the European defence industry is characterised by varying national policies and programmes, which in addition to the economic and financial crisis could further aggravate the adverse effects on the industry; calls for further development of EU defence policy, leading to solid research, technological and industrial cooperation among Member States, to reinforce the competitiveness and resilience of the defence industry;
8. poudarja pomen izboljšanja dolgoročne konkurenčnosti evropske obrambne industrije z namenom zagotoviti večji dostop do trgov tretjih držav in zlasti trgov v vzponu;
Highlights the importance of improving the long-term competitiveness of the European defence industry with a view to ensuring greater access to third-country markets, and emerging markets in particular;
Antonio Cancian, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Gunnar Hökmark, Yannick Jadot, Ivajlo Kalfin (Ivailo Kalfin), Bernd Lange, Werner Langen, Markus Pieper, Mario Pirillo, Hannes Swoboda, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Antonio Cancian, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Gunnar Hökmark, Yannick Jadot, Ivailo Kalfin, Bernd Lange, Werner Langen, Markus Pieper, Mario Pirillo, Hannes Swoboda, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Elmar Brok, Arnaud Danjean, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Anna Ibrisagic, Jelko Kacin, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Eduard Kukan, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Mario Mauro, Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Raimon Obiols, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Gabriele Albertini, Sir Robert Atkins, Franziska Katharina Brantner, Elmar Brok, Arnaud Danjean, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Anna Ibrisagic, Jelko Kacin, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Eduard Kukan, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Mario Mauro, Willy Meyer, Francisco José Millán Mon, Raimon Obiols, Justas Vincas Paleckis, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Alojz Peterle, Cristian Dan Preda, Libor Rouček, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Jan Kozłowski, Bogusław Sonik, Róża, grofica Thun Und Hohenstein
António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Jan Kozłowski, Bogusław Sonik, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein
Poročevalka: Norica Nicolai
Rapporteur: Norica Nicolai
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 50 Poslovnika
(*) Procedure with associated committees - Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
o položaju žensk v vojni
on women’s situation in war
– ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije OZN o človekovih pravicah z dne 10. decembra 1948 ter dunajske deklaracije in akcijskega programa, sprejetih 25. junija 1993 na Svetovni konferenci o človekovih pravicah, zlasti odstavkov I 28-29 in II 38 o sistematičnih posilstvih, spolnem suženjstvu in prisilni nosečnosti v razmerah oboroženih spopadov;
– having regard to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948 and to the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, as adopted by the World Conference on Human Rights of 25 June 1993, in particular paragraphs I 28-29 and II 38 on systematic rape, sexual slavery and forced pregnancy in situations of armed conflict,
– ob upoštevanju konvencije Združenih narodov o odpravi vseh oblik diskriminacije žensk (CEDAW) z dne 18. decembra 1979 in deklaracije Združenih narodov o odpravi nasilja nad ženskami z dne 20. decembra 1993
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) of 18 December 1979 and to the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women of 20 December 1993
– ob upoštevanju resolucij varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1325 (2000) in 1820 (2008) o ženskah, miru in varnosti, resolucije varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1888 (2009) o spolnem nasilju nad ženskami in otroki v oboroženih spopadih, resolucije varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1889 (2009) za krepitev izvajanja in spremljanja resolucije varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1325 ter resolucije varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov 1960 (2010), s katero je bil oblikovan mehanizem za zbiranje podatkov o storilcih spolnega nasilja v oboroženih spopadih ter objavo njihovih imen,
– having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 1325 (2000) and 1820 (2008) on women, peace and security, to UN Security Council Resolution 1888 (2009) on sexual violence against women and children in situations of armed conflict, to UN Security Council Resolution 1889 (2009) aiming to strengthen the implementation and monitoring of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 and to UN Security Council Resolution 1960 (2010), which created a mechanism for compiling data on, and listing perpetrators of, sexual violence in armed conflict,
– ob upoštevanju imenovanja posebnega predstavnika generalnega sekretarja OZN za spolno nasilje v oboroženih spopadih marca 2010,
– having regard to the appointment in March 2010 of a Special Representative to the UN Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Armed Conflict,
– ob upoštevanju Pekinške deklaracije in izhodišč za ukrepanje, sprejetih 15. septembra 1995 na četrti svetovni konferenci o ženskah, ter kasnejših sklepnih dokumentov, sprejetih na posebnih zasedanjih Združenih narodov Peking+5 (2000), Peking +10 (2005) in Peking+15 (2010),
– having regard to the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted by the Fourth World Conference on Women on 15 September 1995 and to the subsequent outcome documents adopted at the United Nations Beijing+5 (2000), Beijing +10 (2005) and Beijing +15 (2010) special sessions,