natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
trdno je prepričan, da je treba preglednost MDS in njegovega dodeljevanja svojih sredstev izboljšati z okrepljenim parlamentarnim nadzorom držav članic MDS;
Strongly believes that the transparency of the IMF and of the allocation of its funds should be increased through strengthened parliamentary control by the member countries of the IMF;
pozdravlja poudarek MDS na izboljšanju ravni izobraževanja in zdravja v državah v razvoju; poudarja, da ostaja boljše upravljanje, boj proti korupciji in učinkovita raba virov najzanesljivejši način za odpravljanje neenakosti pri dostopu do dobrin in temeljnih pravic, kakor sta izobraževanje in zdravje;
Welcomes the IMF's emphasis on improving the levels of education and health in developing countries; stresses that improving governance, combating corruption and efficient use of resources, remains the surest way to reduce inequality of access to goods and to fundamental rights such as education and health;
vztraja, da se lahko mednarodna finančna stabilnost spodbuja le, če bo reforma MDS usklajena s trajnostno proračunsko politiko in dobro prilagojeno plačilno bilanco v vsaki državi članici;
Insists that international financial stability can only be promoted if the reform of the IMF goes hand in hand with a sustainable budgetary policy and a well-adjusted balance of payments in every member country;
ugotavlja, da obstaja očitno nasprotje med stopnjo pritiska, ki ga MDS izvaja na države v razvoju in države v tranziciji, in njegovo nemočjo, da dejansko vpliva na politiko industrializiranih držav, katerih proračunska politika in plačilna bilanca ne izpolnjujeta polno meril MDS ter lahko tako ogrozita mednarodno finančno stabilnost;
Notes the striking contrast between the degree of pressure which the IMF can bring to bear on the developing and transitional countries and its powerlessness to exert any significant influence on the policies of the industrialised countries, whose budgetary policy and balance of payments fail in part to fulfil the criteria established by the IMF and may therefore undermine international financial stability;
pozdravlja odločitev, ki sta jo sprejela MDS in Svetovna banka o podaljšanju izvajanja pobude za visoko zadolžene države v razvoju; ugotavlja različne vplive programov pobude za visoko zadolžene države v razvoju in zgodovinske izkušenje prestrukturiranja ter odpisa dolga; predlaga, da MDS oblikuje politike za preprečevanje novih kriz zadolževanja v prihodnje;
Welcomes the decision taken by the IMF and the World Bank to extend the experiment of the HIPC (Heavily Indebted Poor Countries) Initiative; notes the perverse effects of the HIPC programmes and the historical experiences of debt restructuring and debt cancellation; suggests that the IMF develop policies to avoid new debt crises in future;
ugotavlja nov Okvir trajnosti dolga, sprejet aprila 2005 s strani MDS in Svetovne banke ob upoštevanju držav z nizkimi prihodki; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je cilj novega okvira, da postane dolg prednostna naloga postopka sprejemanja odločitev mednarodnih finančnih ustanov; obžaluje, da se predlog v celoti ne približa reševanju težave dolgoročne in prave trajnosti pri ustvarjanju pogojev za to, da države z nizkimi prihodki dosežejo RCNT;
Notes the new Debt Sustainability Framework adopted in April 2005 by the IMF and the World Bank with regard to low income countries; welcomes the fact that the new Framework aims to put debt at the centre of the international financial institutions" decision-making process; regrets that the proposal as a whole does not come close to addressing the problem of long-term, real sustainability in terms of creating conditions for low income countries to attain the MDGs;
na splošno pozdravlja program pomoči MDS za zmanjšanje revščine in rast;
Welcomes the IMF's PRGF programme in general terms;
podpira poziv generalnega sekretarja ZN, izrečenega na srečanju o financiranju razvoja, ki je potekalo na visoki ravni leta 2005, da bi ponovno opredelili vzdržnost dolga kakor stopnjo dolga, ki določeni državi še dovoljuje, da bi dosegla RCNT in pričakala leto 2015 brez povišanja količnika dolga, za kar je potrebno boljše dopolnjevanje med oprostitvijo dolga in zahtevami za financiranje uspešnega razvoja; zato obžaluje, da MDS v novem odobrenem okviru za vzdržnost dolga v državah z nizkim dohodkom vzdržnost dolga še vedno opredeljuje predvsem na podlagi kazalnikov izvoza (kar je nezanesljiv pokazatelj vzdržnosti dolga držav, ki so izjemno občutljive na pretrese in izrazito nihanje prihodkov od izvoza) ter ne poda realnih ocen o občutljivosti in tudi ne sistematične analize o povezovanju ugodnosti iz pobude "visoko zadolženih revnih držav" z dodatnimi sredstvi, potrebnimi za dosego RCNT;
Supports the call by the UN Secretary-General at the 2005 High Level Dialogue on Finance for Development to redefine debt sustainability as the level of debt that allows a country to achieve the MDGs by 2015 without an increase in debt ratios, which requires greater complementarity between debt relief and outstanding development financing requirements; regrets therefore that in the new Debt Sustainability Framework for low income countries, the IMF continues to define debt sustainability essentially in terms of export ratios (which is an unreliable predictor of debt sustainability for countries characterised by an extreme vulnerability to shock and steep fluctuations in export earnings), that it lacks realistic assessments of vulnerability and that there is no systematic analysis linking the benefits of the HIPC Initiative and the extra funds needed to achieve the MDGs;
pozdravlja prizadevanja večstranskih ustanov, da v okviru sporazuma G8 na svoj način pripomorejo k financiranju zmanjšanja dolga, hkrati pa se zaveda, da to nujno sodelovanje v teh ustanovah ne sme povzročiti finančnih težav;
Welcomes the efforts made by the multilateral institutions to play their part in funding debt reduction in the context of the agreement concluded by the G8, while recognising that this necessary participation must not place these institutions in financial difficulties;
spodbuja boljše sodelovanje med MDS, Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, še posebej v državah v razvoju, da bi povečali preglednost, demokratično odgovornost in legitimnost MDS in njegove politike, ter zahteva objavo izčrpnejših zapisnikov izvršnega odbora MDS;
Encourages better cooperation between the IMF and the European Parliament and national parliaments, especially in developing countries, in order to strengthen transparency, democratic responsibility and the legitimacy of the IMF and its policies, and requests the publication of more extensive minutes from the IMF Executive Board;
poudarja pomen rednih stikov med izvršnimi direktorji MDS in nacionalnimi predstavniki njihove države izvora;
Stresses the importance of regular contact between IMF Executive Directors and the national representatives of their countries of origin;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter MDS, organizacijam ZN, Evropski centralni banki in guvernerjem MDS iz držav članic EU.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, and to the IMF, the UN organisations, the ECB and the IMF governors of the EU Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o selitvi proizvodnje v okviru regionalnega razvoja ( 2004/2254(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on relocation in the context of regional development ( 2004/2254(INI) )
ob upoštevanju skupne Listine o temeljnih socialnih pravicah delavcev iz leta 1989 in pripadajočega akcijskega programa,
having regard to the 1989 Community Charter of Fundamental Social Rights of Workers and the associated action programme,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 94/45/ES z dne 22. septembra 1994 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sveta delavcev ali uvedbi postopka obveščanja in posvetovanja z delavci v družbah ali povezanih družbah na območju Skupnosti UL L 254, 30.9.1994, str.
having regard to Council Directive 94/45/EC of 22 September 1994 on the establishment of a European works council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees OJ L 254, 30.9.1994, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 98/59/ES z dne 20. julija 1998 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi s kolektivnimi odpusti UL L 225, 12.8.1998, str.
having regard to Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies OJ L 225, 12.8.1998, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2001/23/ES z dne 12. marca 2001 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic v zvezi z ohranjanjem pravic delavcev v primeru prenosa podjetij, obratov ali delov podjetij ali obratov UL L 82, 22.3 2001, str.
having regard to Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees" rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses OJ L 82, 22.3.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije - Smernice o državni regionalni pomoči UL C 74, 10.3.1998, str.
having regard to the Commission communication on guidelines on national regional aid OJ C 74, 10.3.1998, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije - Ponovna ocena smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za obdobje po 1. januarju 2007 UL C 110, 8.5.2003, str.
having regard to the Commission communication on review of the guidelines on national regional aid for the period after 1 January 2007 OJ C 110, 8.5.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 2204/2002 z dne 12. decembra 2002 o uporabi členov 87 in 88 Pogodbe o ES za državne pomoči na področju zaposlovanja UL L 337, 13.12.2002, str.
having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2204/2002 of 12 December 2002 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid for employment OJ L 337, 13.12.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. marca 2003 o zaprtju podjetij, ki so prejemala finančno pomoč Evropske unije UL C 61 E, 10.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 March 2003 on the closure of companies which have benefited from EU financial assistance OJ C 61 E, 10.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o Tretjem poročilu o gospodarski in socialni koheziji UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 22 April 2004 on the Commission communication on the Third Report on economic and social cohesion OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2005 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu Sprejeta besedila 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0277 .
having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2005 on the proposal for a Council Regulation laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund Texts adopted, 6.7.2005, P6_TA(2005)0277 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. decembra 2005 o vlogi neposredne državne pomoči kot orodju regionalnega razvoja Sprejeta besedila 15.12.2005, P6_TA(2005)0527 .
having regard to its resolution of 15 December 2005 on the role of direct State aid as a tool of regional development Texts, adopted, 15.12.2005, P6_TA(2005)0527 .
ob upoštevanju členov 87(3), 136 in 158 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 87(3), 136 and 158 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0013/2006 ),
having regard to the report by the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0013/2006 ),
ker je cilj regionalne razvojne politike podpirati razvoj regij v Evropski uniji; ker je zato potrebno zagotoviti usklajenost med regionalno razvojno politiko in konkurenčno politiko, kar pomeni, da državne pomoči ne smejo spodbujati selitev gospodarskih dejavnosti,
whereas the goal of regional development policy is to encourage the development of the regions of the European Union, and to this end, it is necessary to ensure consistency between regional development policy and competition policy, and whereas this means that public aid must not provide a spur to the relocation of economic activity,
ker je kohezijska politika sredstvo, ki Evropski uniji omogoča zmanjšanje razlik v najrevnejših regijah, in je bistvena za podporo podjetjem in naložbe v infrastrukturne projekte v navedenih regijah; ker je državna pomoč pravno sredstvo za doseganje tega cilja,
whereas Cohesion Policy is an instrument of the European Union that enables it to reduce disparities affecting the poorest regions and it is essential to support companies and invest in infrastructure projects within those regions; whereas public aid is a legal instrument for achieving that objective,
ker se podjetja odločijo za selitev svojih dejavnosti zaradi številnih razlogov, od katerih nekateri niso v ničemer povezani z vprašanji produktivnosti, učinkovitosti ali rentabilnosti; ker pa so lahko posledice takih selitev ukinitve številnih delovnih mest in gospodarske težave, ki imajo posebno velik vpliv na regionalni razvoj, saj obstaja v zapuščeni regiji le malo možnosti za zaposlitev,
whereas companies choose to relocate their activities for manifold reasons, some of which are in no way connected to issues of productivity, efficiency or economic viability; whereas such relocation is liable, however, to result in major job losses and economic hardships whose impact on regional development will be all the more pronounced where there are few employment possibilities in the region abandoned,
ker je glede na to situacijo na ravni Skupnosti nujno treba vzpostaviti sisteme nadzora, namenjenih ovrednotenju gospodarskih in socialnih stroškov vsake selitve proizvodnje; ker je Evropski parlament v svoji prej navedeni resoluciji z dne 6. julija 2005 pozval k sprejetju vseh potrebnih pravnih ukrepov, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da podjetja, ki prejemajo finančno pomoč Skupnosti, ne bi svojih obratov za daljše ali vnaprej določeno obdobje premestila na drugo območje, in k sprejetju določbe, s katero bi se prepovedalo sofinanciranje projektov, ki imajo za posledico bistveno izgubo delovnih mest ali zapiranje obratov na njihovih obstoječih lokacijah; ker je Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 15. decembra 2005 tudi menil, da pomoč EU za preselitev podjetij ne prispeva k evropski dodani vrednosti in bi se ji zato bilo treba izogibati,
whereas in the light of the situation described it is necessary to set up Community-widemonitoring systems to quantify the economic and social cost of any relocation; whereas the European Parliament, in its resolution of 6 July 2005, called for the adoption of all necessary legal measures to ensure that firms which receive Community funding do not relocate for a long and predetermined period, and for a provision ruling out the cofinancing of operations which result in substantial job losses or the closure of plants at their existing locations; whereas it also considered, in its resolution of 15 December 2005, that EU aid for company relocations does not provide any European added value and should therefore be avoided,
ker globalizacija, tehnološki napredek in odstranjevanje ovir za vstop v določene države olajšujejo mednarodne izmenjave ter Evropski uniji ponujajo možnosti v globaliziranem svetu, ker pa lahko tudi povečajo nevarnost selitve proizvodnje,
whereas globalisation, technological progress and the removal of barriers to the access of certain countries facilitates international trade and presents the European Union with opportunities in a globalised world, but may also increase the risks of relocation,
ker bi državna pomoč morala prispevati k ustvarjanju trajnih delovnih mest,
whereas public aid must contribute to creating lasting employment,
ker niti statistični mehanizem Skupnosti niti statistični mehanizmi držav članic Evropske unije v tem trenutku ne zmorejo podati skupnih in natančnih podatkov o obsegu selitev dejavnosti v Uniji in izven nje, zlasti če gre za ovrednotenje selitev podjetij in vplivov, ki jih imajo selitve na zaposlitev v izvornih in namembnih državah; ker bi bilo torej treba okrepiti evropska statistična sredstva,
whereas neither the Community's statistical system nor those of the EU Member States are able at present to provide comprehensive and accurate data on the scale of relocations of activities within or out of the Union, particularly when it comes to quantifying company relocations and their impact on employment in the country of origin and the new host country; whereas the European statistical mechanism should therefore be reinforced,
ker je lahko državna pomoč potrebna kakor nujen ukrep v okoliščinah, v katerih bo prestrukturiranje ali selitev proizvodnje povzročila množično izgubo delovnih mest v določenem kraju,
whereas public aid may be needed as an emergency measure in circumstances where restructuring or relocation will lead to major job losses in a given locality,
poudarja, da je selitev proizvodnje podjetij v več državah Evropske unije resna zadeva;
Points out that company relocation is a serious concern in several Member States;
zahteva spoštovanje in izvajanje cilja gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne povezanosti ter strateških ciljev polne zaposlenosti z zagotovljenimi pravicami in socialnim napredkom, kakor je navedeno v členu I-3(3) Osnutka ustavne pogodbe; poziva EU, da ne nudi finančne podpore praksam, ki ne pomagajo pri uresničevanju navedenih ciljev, kakor so na primer selitve proizvodnje, ki niso utemeljene z rentabilnostjo ali ki bi za posledico lahko imele ukinitev številnih delovnih mest;
Calls for the objective of economic, social and territorial cohesion and the strategic goals of full employment, along with rights and social progress, set out in Article 1-3(3) of the draft Constitutional Treaty, to be respected and implemented, and calls for practices that are not conducive to the achievement of those goals, such as relocation that is not justified from the point of view of economic viability or that is liable to lead to substantial job losses, not to be supported financially by the EU;
poudarja, da mora biti namen strukturnih in kohezijskih skladov kohezija, ki zajema spodbujanje povezanosti in solidarnosti med državami članicami, in da se mora ves trud prednostno usmerjati na regije v gospodarskem zaostanku;
Points out that the Structural and Cohesion Funds must serve the purpose of cohesion consisting of promoting cohesiveness and solidarity between Member States, and that efforts must focus as a priority on the regions lagging behind economically;
meni, da selitev proizvodnje lahko zadeva, ne samo tako imenovanih tradicionalnih delovno intenzivnih industrijskih panog, ampak tudi kapitalsko intenzivne panoge ter storitveni sektor;
Believes that relocation can affect not only highly labour-intensive "traditional" industries, but also highly capital-intensive industries and the services sector;
priporoča, naj Komisija primerno in pozorno spremlja trenutno zapiranje podjetij in selitve proizvodnje ter zahteva vračilo dodeljenih pomoči, če so bile te zlorabljene;
Recommends that the Commission keep current company closures and relocations under proper and careful review and that it demand that aid granted be paid back if it is misused;
poudarja, da se morajo Komisija in države članice zavzeti za sprejetje ukrepov na nacionalnih ravneh in na ravneh Skupnosti, s katerimi bodo preprečile možne negativne posledice selitev proizvodnje na gospodarski razvoj in socialne tragedije, ki jih povzroči neposredna ali posredna izguba delovnega mesta zaradi selitve proizvodnje v regijah Evropske unije z majhnimi ali neobstoječimi možnostmi prekvalifikacije, od koder se podjetja selijo;
Stresses the necessity for the Commission and Member States to initiate the adoption of measures at national and Community levels to prevent the potential negative impacts on economic development and the social tragedies engendered by the loss of direct or indirect employment in regions of the European Union from which companies pull out and which have little or no ability to restructure themselves;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da evropska regionalna politika ne bi spodbujala selitve podjetij, ki povzroča izgube delovnih mest;
Calls on the Commission to take all requisite measures to prevent European regional policy becoming an incentive to the relocation of companies with ensuing job losses;
priznava predlog Komisije, ki jo je ta sprejela v okviru reforme strukturnih skladov in na podlagi katere bo lahko kaznovala tista podjetja, ki jim je bila dodeljena finančna pomoč Evropske unije, vendar so preselila dejavnost v roku sedmih let od dodelitve teh sredstev; to je prvi nujni ukrep za dosego gospodarske, socialne in teritorialne povezanosti v Evropski uniji;
Acknowledges the Commission's proposal, within the framework of the reform of the Structural Funds, to penalise companies which, having received European Union aid, relocate their activities within seven years of the grant of aid, this being an essential first step in support of economic, social and territorial cohesion within the EU;
zahteva tudi, da se podjetjem, ki so prejela javno pomoč, zlasti kadar niso spoštovala vseh obveznosti, vezanih na to pomoč, ali podjetjem, ki so odpustila zaposlene na obstoječih lokacijah, ne da bi spoštovala nacionalne ali mednarodne predpise, in ki so preselila svojo proizvodnjo znotraj Evropske unije, onemogoči koriščenje državne pomoči na novi lokaciji in da tudi v prihodnje, sedem let od selitve proizvodnje, ne bi mogla koristiti sredstev iz strukturnih skladov ali iz državne pomoči;
Calls also for companies that have received public aid - in particular where they have failed to comply with all of the obligations connected with that aid - or laid off the staff at their original location, without complying with national or international law, and have then relocated within the European Union, to be blocked from receiving public aid in their new location, and likewise blocked from receiving Structural Funds or State aid for a period of seven years following relocation;
prav tako ocenjuje, da bi bilo treba predvideti ukrepe za grožnje s selitvijo proizvodnje ("reverse relocations" - pojav, ko delodajalec sili zaposlene, da sprejmejo slabše delovne pogoje, z grožnjo, da se bo sicer podjetje moralo preseliti), zaradi katerih se poslabšajo pogoji zaposlitve, ne da bi se selila dejavnost podjetja;
Believes that measures should also be contemplated with regard to 'reverse' relocations, namely those which, without relocation of the company's activities, lead to a deterioration in working conditions;
meni, da je zaradi neusklajenosti nacionalnih socialnih sistemov Evropske unije treba nujno sprejeti vrsto usklajenih ukrepov znotraj različnih politik Evropske unije; poziva, naj se takoj izdela splošna evropska strategija preprečevanja, upravljanja in spremljanja selitev podjetij v EU in izven nje, ki jo bo izvajala Unija v sodelovanju z vsemi državami članicami;
Believes that in the absence of better coordination of the European Union's national systems of social provision, it is now imperative that a package of coordinated measures be implemented via the European Union's various policies; for that reason, calls for the rapid establishment of a European strategy for averting, managing and monitoring the relocation of companies within and also out of the EU, implemented at Union level and coordinated with all the Member States;