natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo in industrijo finančnih storitev, da nadalje obravnavata prednosti in slabosti "26. režima" za finančne storitve, ki bi jih mobilni državljani EU lahko potrebovali za svoje dejavnosti v drugih državah članicah, da bi se tako bili zmožni posluževati bližnjih ponudnikov storitev in da bi morali uporabljati le preprosta standardna pravila; zlasti poziva Komisijo, da opredeli pravno podlago, zagotovi visoko raven varnosti potrošnikov, opredeli potrebne elemente za usklajevanje in ustrezen nadzorni režim;
Urges the Commission and the financial services industry to discuss further the advantages and disadvantages of the '26th regime' to financial services, which mobile EU citizens may need for their activities in other Member States, so that they are able to use service providers familiar to them and need deal only with a simple standard set of rules; urges the Commission, in particular, to define a legal basis, to secure consumer protection at a high level, and to define the required components of harmonisation and an appropriate supervisory regime;
verjame, da je pluralistična struktura evropskega bančnega trga naložba za evropsko gospodarstvo in ne sme biti vprašljiva;
Believes that the pluralistic structure of the European banking market is an asset to the European economy and should not be called into question;
opaža, da stopnje tržne koncentracije v nekaterih državah članicah zbujajo skrb glede strukture trga, ravnanja in vedenja evropskih bank ter drugih finančnih institucij;
Notes that levels of market concentration in certain Member States raise concerns regarding the market structure, conduct and behaviour of European banks and other financial institutions;
prosi, da Komisija in nacionalni organi za konkurenco v skladu s pogodbo ES ter sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti natančno preučijo koncentracijo finančnih trgov in institucij;
Asks that the concentration of financial markets and institutions is scrupulously examined by the Commission and by national competition authorities in compliance with the EC Treaty and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi dosledno izvajanje ustrezne zakonodaje s strani članic;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the relevant legislation is consistently implemented by the Member States;
zahteva od Komisije, da v glavnih regionalnih finančnih centrih preuči, kakšen vpliv ima konsolidacija na financiranje malih regij ter malih in srednje velikih podjetij;
Asks the Commission to examine the implications of consolidation in major regional financial centres on the financing of small regions and SMEs;
pozdravlja nedavno sprejete ukrepe EU v zvezi z bonitetnim nadzorom, zlasti predlog direktive o kapitalski ustreznosti, ki daje prednost načelu nadzora v domači državi in občutno spreminja veljavni nadzorni okvir, ki sedaj vključuje nove določbe o sodelovanju med nacionalnimi pristojnimi organi, zahtevami po preglednosti nadzornih organov in okrepljenimi pristojnostmi za nadzornika, ki izvaja konsolidirani nadzor, kar zadeva potrditev modelov za merjenje tveganja; meni, da mora v sedanji zakonodaji to potezo dopolnjevati jasna opredelitev ter dobro uravnotežena delitev pristojnosti in odgovornosti med domačimi nadzorniki in nadzorniki države gostiteljice brez poseganja v klavzule o pregledu, ki jih vsebuje direktiva;
Welcomes the recently adopted EU measures regarding prudential supervision, in particular the Capital Requirements Directive, advancing the home country control principle and considerably changing the current supervisory framework, which now includes new provisions on the cooperation between national competent authorities, supervisory disclosure requirements, and enhanced powers for the consolidating supervisor as regards the validation of risk measurement models; believes that, in the current legislation, this move should be complemented by a clear definition and a well-balanced allocation of powers and responsibilities between home and host country supervisors, without prejudice to the review clauses contained in the directive;
ugotavlja, da preoblikovanje družb glavnih finančnih skupin EU, ki so pripravljene sprejeti model SE, lahko pomembno vpliva na zadevne nadzornike; poziva Komisijo, da spremlja položaj in preuči, ali ima model SE kakršnekoli posledice za bonitetno stabilnost in strukture kriznega upravljanja;
Notes that the transformation of the corporate structure of some major EU financial groups willing to adopt the SE model might have significant implications on the supervisors concerned; calls on the Commission to monitor the situation and to examine whether there are any implications of the SE model on prudential stability and crisis management structures;
poziva Komisijo, da v predlogih ustrezno upošteva težave, s katerimi se srečujejo nekateri nacionalni zakonodajalci pri posredovanju na trgih z močno prisotnostjo tujega kapitala;
Calls on the Commission to take due account in its proposals of the difficulties experienced by certain national regulators in intervening in markets characterised by a very strong presence of foreign capital;
ugotavlja, da na zelo povezanih finančnih trgih nacionalni organi ne morejo posamezno rešiti krize glede nacionalnih pristojnosti; v zvezi s tem meni, da sedanje mreže nacionalnih nadzornikov, nadzornega režima in pravno neobvezujočih memorandumov o dogovoru mogoče niso dovolj za obvladovanje hude krize, ki jo povzroči propad trgov ali pomembnih čezmejnih finančnih skupin; meni, da sta sodelovanje in medsebojno zaupanje med nadzornimi organi v primeru krize temeljnega pomena, ter poziva Komisijo in odgovorne nacionalne organe, da skupaj razvijejo ustrezne predloge za učinkovito krizno upravljanje za nadaljnjo obravnavo v Parlamentu;
Notes that in highly integrated financial markets, a crisis spilling over national jurisdictions cannot be tackled individually by national authorities; in this respect, considers that the current networks of national supervisors, the supervisory arrangements, and the non-legally binding memoranda of understanding may not be sufficient to face a major crisis caused by a failure of markets or important cross-border financial groups; considers that cooperation and mutual trust between supervisory authorities in a crisis event is crucial and urges the Commission and responsible national authorities to develop jointly appropriate proposals for effective crisis management for the further consideration of the Parliament;
meni, da bi se avtoriteta Evropske unije v mednarodnih pogajanjih, zlasti kar zadeva bančni nadzor, okrepila, če bi bilo pojasnjeno njeno notranje delovanje;
Considers that the EU's authority in international negotiations, particularly as regards bank supervision, would be reinforced by the clarification of its internal functioning;
ugotavlja, da je treba vprašanje posojilodajalca zadnjih sredstev rešiti vzporedno z vsako nadaljnjo razpravo o evropskem finančnem nadzoru; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je nujna jasna odločitev o pristojnostih;
Notes that the question of the lender of last resort must be resolved in parallel to any further discussions about EU financial supervision; in this respect, stresses that a clear decision on responsibilities is necessary;
ugotavlja, da sedanji nadzorni sistem vodi do večkratnih zahtev glede poročanja za banke in da je torej približevanje standardov pomembna naloga za vse nadzorne institucije;
Notes that the current supervisory system leads to multiple reporting requirements for banks and that, therefore, an important task for all supervisory institutions is to converge the standards;
verjame, da je skrajni čas, da institucije EU in zlasti Parlament začnejo razpravo o strukturi nadzora finančnih trgov EU; zato poziva k ustanovitvi odbora "modrecev" do konca leta 2006, ki bo preučil vplive konsolidacije trgov in finančnih institucij na bonitetni nadzor, finančno stabilnost in krizno upravljanje ter o njih poročal šest mesecev po ustanovitvi odbora; v zvezi s tem prosi odbor, da predlaga konkretne ideje v zvezi s poenostavitvijo večkratnih zahtev za poročanje, izboljšanjem sedanjih struktur in na koncu razmisli o potrebah in strukturah evropskih finančnih nadzornikov;
Believes that it is high time that the EU institutions, and particularly the Parliament, opened a debate on the structure of supervision of EU financial markets; for this reason, calls for the setting up, by the end of 2006, of a committee of "wise persons" to study - and report back six months after the establishment of the committee - the implications of the consolidation of markets and financial institutions, prudential supervision, financial stability, and crisis management; in this regard, asks the committee to propose concrete ideas regarding the simplification of multiple reporting requirements and the improvement of the current structures, and, ultimately, to reflect on the needs and structures of European financial supervisors;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih v zvezi s pravom družb ( 2006/2051(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law ( 2006/2051(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 21. maja 2003 z naslovom "Posodabljanje prava družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji – načrt za napredek" ( KOM(2003)0284 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 21 May 2003, entitled "Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union - A Plan to Move Forward" ( COM(2003)0284 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije spomladanskemu Evropskemu svetu: Skupna prizadevanja za gospodarsko rast in nova delovna mesta – Nov začetek za Lizbonsko strategijo ( KOM(2005)0024 ),
having regard to the Commission's Communication to the spring European Council: Working together for growth and jobs - A new start for the Lisbon Strategy ( COM(2005)0024 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom "Skupni ukrepi za rast in zaposlovanje: Lizbonski program Skupnosti" ( KOM(2005)0330 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Common Actions for Growth and Employment: the Community Lisbon programme" ( COM(2005)0330 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom "Rezultati preverjanja zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca" ( KOM(2005)0462 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator" ( COM(2005)0462 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu, Svetu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2005)0535 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions entitled "Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2005)0535 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti – Moderna politika za MSP za rast in zaposlovanje" ( KOM(2005)0551 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions entitled "Implementing the Community Lisbon programme - Modern SME policy for growth and employment" ( COM(2005)0551 ),
ob upoštevanju Resolucije z dne 21. aprila 2004 o posodabljanju prava družb in izboljšanju upravljanja podjetij UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 21 April 2004 on modernising company law and enhancing corporate governance OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0229/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0229/2006 ),
ker akcijski načrt, predlagan v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije z dne 21. maja 2003 ("akcijski načrt 2003"), opredeljuje pomembne cilje za posodobitev prava družb in upravljanja podjetij,
whereas the Action Plan proposed in the abovementioned Commission communication of 21 May 2003 ("the 2003 Action Plan") defines important objectives for the modernisation of company law and corporate governance,
ker je bil pri doseganju teh ciljev že dosežen pomemben napredek,
whereas important progress has already been made in the achievement of those objectives,
ker je treba sprejeti ukrepe za zagotovitev mehanizmov prava družb, ki povečujejo učinkovitost in konkurenčnost poslovanja v Evropi, saj je treba akcijski načrt 2003 obravnavati glede na prenovljeno Lizbonsko strategijo,
whereas, since the 2003 Action Plan has to be seen in the light of the renewed Lisbon Strategy, measures need to be taken in order to provide for company law mechanisms that enhance the efficiency and competitiveness of business across Europe,
ker izboljšanje konkurenčnosti evropskega poslovanja zahteva celostni pristop na ravni EU,
whereas improving the competitiveness of European business requires an integrated approach at EU level,
ker je nujno treba izboljšati zakonodajno okolje za podjetja, da bomo lahko dosegli cilje programa Lizbonske strategije,
whereas it is essential to improve the regulatory environment for companies in order to achieve the Lisbon Agenda objectives,
ker bi bilo treba na zakonsko urejen sistem udeležbe delavcev na ravni podjetij, kot ga poznajo v številnih državah članicah, gledati kot na sestavni del evropskega načina upravljanja podjetij, ki prispeva k doseganju ciljev Lizbonske strategije,
whereas a statutorily regulated system of employee participation at the level of undertakings, as found in a large number of Member States, should be seen as forming an integral part of European corporate governance which makes a contribution to achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy,
ker je boljša pravna ureditev še posebej pomembna za mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP),
whereas better regulation is of particular importance for small and medium-sized enterprises ("SMEs"),
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi skladnost ukrepov, namenjenih posodabljanju na področju prava družb in upravljanja podjetij, z ukrepi v sorodnih sektorjih, kot na primer finančnih storitvah, industrijski politiki, socialni politiki in družbeni odgovornosti gospodarskih družb;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the measures aimed at modernisation in the field of company law and corporate governance are consistent with measures in related sectors, such as financial services, industrial policy, social policy and corporate social responsibility;
poudarja pomembnost upoštevanja sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti glede načela svobode ustanavljanja;
Stresses the importance of taking into account the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities on the principle of freedom of establishment;
poziva Komisijo, da pri odločanju o nadaljnjih ukrepih za razvoj prava družb upošteva evropski socialni model; to vključuje tudi udeležbo delavcev;
Calls on the Commission to take the European social model into consideration when deciding on further measures for the development of company law; this also involves the participation of employees;
poudarja pomembnost boljše pravne ureditve, da se zagotovi učinkovitejši zakonodajni okvir; poudarja, da je pomembno izboljšati kakovost zakonodaje s sistematičnimi posvetovanji z zainteresiranimi stranmi o vseh prihodnjih pobudah, strogim upoštevanjem načela subsidiarnosti, izbiranjem instrumentov, ki podjetja manj obremenjujejo in jim omogočajo čim večjo prilagodljivost, ter z obsežno presojo vplivov v zvezi z vsako novo zakonodajno pobudo;
Highlights the importance of better regulation in order to provide a more effective legislative framework; emphasises that it is important to improve the quality of legislation through systematic consultations with stakeholders on all future initiatives, strict compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, choosing instruments that place less of a burden on companies and leave them as much flexibility as possible, and comprehensive impact assessment in respect of any new legislative initiative;
poudarja, da se o veljavnih direktivah ES o pravu družb ne sme več razpravljati: treba bi jih bilo poenostaviti le v izjemnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, če ne obravnavajo zelo občutljivih zadev ali niso rezultat zahtevnih kompromisov, da ne povzročimo škodljivega učinka na zadevne družbe;
Stresses that EC company law directives in force should not be discussed: they should be simplified only in exceptional and duly justified cases, when they are not dealing with very sensitive matters or are not the result of difficult compromises, in order not to have an adverse effect on the companies concerned;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za vzpostavitev boljšega zakonodajnega okolja za MSP;
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to create a better regulatory environment for SMEs;
poziva Komisijo, da pri ocenjevanju vpliva zakonodajnih predlogov na področju prava družb preveri razsežnost MSP ter zagotovi, da se potrebe MSP ustrezno in sistematično upoštevajo;
Calls on the Commission to examine the SME dimension when assessing the impact of legislative proposals in the field of company law and to ensure that the needs of SMEs are properly and systematically taken into account;
poudarja, da je treba zlasti odpraviti ovire, s katerimi se soočajo MSP v smislu upravnega bremena;
Stresses that, in particular, the barriers faced by SMEs in terms of the administrative burden must be removed;
poziva Komisijo, da v prihodnjih zakonodajnih predlogih ali bodočih revizijah veljavne zakonodaje bolj upošteva potrebe MSP; opozarja, da MSP odpirajo nova delovna mesta in poganjajo gospodarsko rast;
Asks the Commission to have more regard to the needs of SMEs in future legislative proposals or future revisions of existing legislation; recalls that SMEs are creators of jobs and a motor of economic growth;
poudarja pomembnost razvijanja najboljših praks, ki spoštujejo različne tradicije in sisteme v državah članicah;
Stresses the importance of developing best practices which respect the different traditions and systems in the Member States;
ugotavlja, da sta bila ustanovljena Evropski forum za upravljanje podjetij in Svetovalna skupina za upravljanje podjetij, ter poziva Komisijo, da Parlament redno seznanja z rezultati dela teh dveh organov in odločitvami, sprejetimi na podlagi teh rezultatov;
Notes that the European Corporate Governance Forum and Corporate Governance Advisory Group have been established, and calls on the Commission to keep Parliament regularly informed about the results of the work of those bodies and the decisions taken on the basis of those results;
obžaluje, da Komisija ni oblikovala jasne vizije upravljanja evropskih družb, temveč očitno sprejema ad hoc ukrepe na različnih področjih; ponavlja sklepe svoje zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 21. aprila 2004 in poziva Komisijo, naj ravna v skladu z njimi;
Regrets that the Commission has not developed a clear vision of the governance of European businesses but seems to be taking measures on disparate aspects on an ad hoc basis; reiterates the conclusions of its abovementioned resolution of 21 April 2004 and calls on the Commission to act on them;
poudarja, da upravljanje podjetij ne obsega samo odnosov med delničarji in upravo, saj so za uravnoteženo sprejemanje odločitev pomembne tudi druge zainteresirane strani znotraj podjetja, ki bi jim moralo biti omogočeno sodelovanje pri sprejemanju odločitev o strategiji podjetja; poudarja, da bi bilo še zlasti potrebno uvesti obveščanje zaposlenih in posvetovanja z njimi;
Stresses that corporate governance is not only about the relationship between shareholders and management, but that other stakeholders within the company are also important for a balanced decision-making process and should be able to contribute to decisions on the strategy of companies; points out, in particular, that there should be room for the provision of information to, and consultation of, employees;
izraža pomisleke glede potrebnosti evropske pobude na področju pravice delničarjev do posebne preiskave, saj ta neposredno zadeva delitev pristojnosti med direktorji, ki podjetje upravljajo, in delničarji, to pa je področje, ki ga ponavadi obravnava nacionalno pravo družb; poleg tega meni, da je treba vsako nadaljnjo pobudo oceniti z vidika tekočega zakonodajnega postopka; poudarja, da nedavni predlog direktive o pravicah delničarjev že predvideva pravico do dodajanja točk na dnevni red skupščine delničarjev in do predložitve resolucij;
Expresses doubts about the need for a European initiative in the field of the special investigation right of shareholders, since this directly affects the separation of competences between directors, who manage the company, and shareholders, which is a topic typically addressed by national corporate laws; considers, in addition, that any further initiative should be evaluated in the light of the on-going legislative process; points out that the recent proposal for a directive on shareholders' rights already provides for the right to add items to the agenda of the general meeting and to table resolutions;
poudarja potrebo po vključitvi regulatorjev in nadzornikov finančnih trgov v razvoj jasnih pravil in priporočil za upravljanje podjetij ter po tesnem usklajevanju politik na področju regulative finančnih trgov na eni strani in na področju prava družb na drugi strani;
Stresses the need for involvement of the financial market regulators and supervisors in the development of clear corporate governance rules and recommendations, and for a close coordination of the policies in the field of financial market regulation on the one hand and company law on the other;
pozdravlja zgoraj omenjeni Komisijin predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju glasovalnih pravic delničarjev družb, ki imajo registrirani sedež v državi članici in katerih delnice so sprejete v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu ter o spremembi Direktive 2004/109/ES ( 2005/0265(COD) );
Welcomes the abovementioned proposal of the Commission for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the exercise of voting rights by shareholders of companies having their registered office in a Member State and whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2004/109/EC ( 2005/0265(COD) );
pozdravlja dosežene sporazume o naslednjih predlogih:
Welcomes the agreements reached on the following proposals:
predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktive Sveta 77/91/EGS o ustanavljanju delniških družb in ohranjanju ter spreminjanju njihovega kapitala ( 2004/0256(COD) );
proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 77/91/EEC as regards the formation of public limited companies and the maintenance and alteration of their capital ( 2004/0256(COD) );
predlog Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi direktiv Sveta 78/660/EGS in 83/349/EGS v zvezi z letnimi računovodskimi izkazi posameznih vrst družb in konsolidiranih letnih poročil ( 2004/0250(COD) );
proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC concerning the annual accounts of certain types of companies and consolidated accounts ( 2004/0250(COD) );
poziva Komisijo, da predlaga ukrepe za izboljšanje čezmejne dosegljivosti informacij o izločitvah direktorjev;
Calls on the Commission to propose measures to enhance the cross-border availability of information regarding the disqualification of directors;