natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pri postopkih, ki se začnejo v skladu s členom 5(9), se preiskava, če je le mogoče, zaključi v roku enega leta.
For proceedings initiated pursuant to Article 5(9), an investigation shall, whenever possible, be concluded within one year.
V vsakem primeru se take preiskave zaključijo v 15 mesecih po njihovem začetku na podlagi ugotovitev, sprejetih v skladu s členom 8, v zvezi z zavezami ali ugotovitvami, sprejetimi v skladu s členom 9, za dokončni ukrep.
In any event, such investigations shall be concluded within 15 months of initiation, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 8 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action.
Zaradi zapletenosti preiskave lahko v izjemnih primerih Komisija v največ 9 mesecih po začetku preiskave podaljša to časovno obdobje za največ 18 mesecev.
In exceptional cases, having regard to the complexity of the investigation, the Commission may decide, no later than 9 months after the initiation of the investigation, to extend this time limit, for a period up to, but in no case longer than, 18 months.
V vsakem primeru se take preiskave zaključijo v 14 mesecih po njihovem začetku na podlagi ugotovitev, sprejetih v skladu s členom 8, v zvezi z zavezami ali ugotovitvami, sprejetimi v skladu s členom 9, za dokončni ukrep.
In any event, such investigations shall be concluded within 14 months of initiation, in accordance with the findings made pursuant to Article 8 for undertakings or the findings made pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 3 a (novo)
Annex – section 24 – point 3 a (new)
V členu 6 se doda naslednji odstavek:
In Article 6, t he following paragraph shall be added :
Najpozneje sedem mesecev in pol po začetku preiskave se Komisija posvetuje z državami članicami na podlagi ugotovitev iz preiskave.
No later than seven and a half months after the initiation of the investigation the Commission shall consult the Member States on the basis of the findings of the investigation.
Države članice med tem posvetovanjem Komisijo obvestijo, ali pričakujejo precejšnje nesoglasje v procesu odločanja v skladu s členom 9 za dokončne ukrepe, zaradi katerega bo verjetno sprožen pritožbeni postopek iz člena 6 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011.
The Member States shall in this consultation indicate to the Commission whether they expect an intense controversy in the decision making process pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action which would be likely to trigger the appeal procedure referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
Če je tako, lahko Komisija v največ osmih mesecih po začetku preiskave odloči o podaljšanju časovnega obdobja iz člena 6(9) za obdobje, ki ni v nobenem primeru daljše od 15 mesecev.
If so the Commission may decide, no later than eight months after the initiation of the investigation, to extend the time limit of Article 6(9), for a period up to, but in no case longer than, 15 months.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 4 – točka a
Annex – section 24 – point 4 – point a
Če se postopek začne v skladu s členom 5, se lahko uvedejo začasne dajatve, če je bilo o tem objavljeno obvestilo, in so zainteresirane strani dobile ustrezno priložnost, da predložijo svoje informacije in predložijo pripombe v skladu s členom 5(10), če je prišlo do začasne pozitivne ugotovitve, da gre za damping in posledično škodo za industrijo Unije, in če interes Unije kliče po intervenciji, da se prepreči taka škoda.
Provisional duties may be imposed if proceedings have been initiated in accordance with Article 5, if a notice has been given to that effect and interested parties have been given an adequate opportunity to submit information and make comments in accordance with Article 5(10), if a provisional affirmative determination has been made of dumping and consequent injury to the Union industry, and if the Union interest calls for intervention to prevent such injury.
Začasne dajatve se ne uvedejo prej kot v 60 dneh in najpozneje 9 mesecev po začetku postopkov.
The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days and no later than 9 months from the initiation of the proceedings.
Začasne dajatve se ne uvedejo prej kot v 60 dneh in najpozneje 8 mesecev po začetku postopkov.
The provisional duties shall be imposed no earlier than 60 days and no later than 8 months from the initiation of the proceedings.
Če države članice Komisijo v skladu s členom 6(10) obvestijo, da pričakujejo precejšnje nesoglasje v procesu odločanja v skladu s členom 9 za dokončne ukrepe, zaradi katerega bo verjetno sprožen pritožbeni postopek iz člena 6 Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011, se lahko Komisija najpozneje 8 mesecev po začetku preiskave odloči za podaljšanje tega časovnega obdobja na obdobje, ki ni v nobenem primeru daljše od 9 mesece v.
In the event that the Member States indicate to the Commission pursuant to Article 6(10) that they expect an intense controversy in the decision making process pursuant to Article 9 for definitive action which would be likely to trigger the appeal procedure referred to in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 , the Commission may decide, no later than 8 months after the initiation of the investigation, to extend this time limit, to a period up to, but in no case longer than, 9 months.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 5 – točka b
Annex – section 24 – point 5 – point b
Kadar se zaveze sprejmejo, se preiskava zaključi.
Where undertakings are accepted, the investigation shall be terminated.
Komisija zaključi preiskavo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 15(2).
The Commission shall terminate the investigation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
Komisija zaključi preiskavo v skladu s postopkom pregleda iz člena 15(2).
The Commission shall terminate the investigation in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
Predsednik lahko pridobi mnenje odbora s pisnim postopkom iz člena 15(4).
The chair may obtain the committee´s opinion by written procedure referred to in Article 15(4).
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 6 – točka a
Annex – section 24 – point 6 – point a
Kadar zaščitni ukrepi niso potrebni, se preiskava ali postopek ustavi.
Where protective measures are unnecessary the investigation or proceeding shall be terminated.
Komisija zaključi preiskavo v skladu s postopkom iz člena 15(2) .
The Commission shall terminate the investigation in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2) .
Komisija zaključi preiskavo v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 15(1a) .
The Commission shall terminate the investigation in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 15(1a).
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 8 – točka b
Annex – section 24 – point 8 – point b
Člen 11 – odstavek 5 – pododstavka 1 in 2
Article 11 – paragraph 5 – subparagraphs 1 and 2
Ustrezne določbe te uredbe v zvezi s postopki in vodenjem preiskav razen tistih, ki se nanašajo na roke, se uporabljajo za vsak pregled, ki se izvaja v skladu z odstavki 2, 3 in 4.
The relevant provisions of this Regulation with regard to procedures and the conduct of investigations, excluding those relating to time-limits, shall apply to any review carried out pursuant to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4.
Pregledi, ki se opravljajo v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3, se izvedejo čim hitreje in se običajno zaključijo v 12 mesecih od datuma začetka pregleda.
Reviews carried out pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be carried out expeditiously and shall normally be concluded within 12 months of the date of initiation of the review.
V vsakem primeru pa se pregledi v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3 zaključijo v 15 mesecih od začetka.
In any event, reviews pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be concluded within 15 months of initiation.
Zaradi zapletenosti preiskave lahko v izjemnih primerih Komisija v največ 9 mesecih po začetku preiskave podaljša to časovno obdobje za največ 18 mesecev .
In exceptional cases, having regard to the complexity of the investigation, the Commission may decide, no later than 9 months after the initiation of the investigation, to extend this time limit, for a period up to, but in no case longer than, 18 months.
Pregledi v skladu z odstavkom 4 se v vseh primerih zaključijo v devetih mesecih od datuma začetka.
Reviews pursuant to paragraph 4 shall in all cases be concluded within nine months of the date of initiation.
Če se pregled, ki se izvaja v skladu z odstavkom 2, začne med tem, ko v istem postopku poteka že pregled v skladu z odstavkom 3, se pregled v skladu z odstavkom 3 zaključi istočasno , kot pregled v skladu z odstavkom 2.
If a review carried out pursuant to paragraph 2 is initiated while a review under paragraph 3 in ongoing in the same proceeding, the review pursuant to paragraph 3 shall be concluded at the same time as the review pursuant to paragraph 2.
V vsakem primeru pa se pregledi v skladu z odstavkoma 2 in 3 zaključijo v 14 mesecih od začetka.
In any event, reviews pursuant to paragraphs 2 and 3 shall be concluded within 14 months of initiation.
Najpozneje sedem mesecev in pol po začetku preiskave v skladu s členom 6 se Komisija posvetuje z državami članicami na podlagi ugotovitev iz preiskave.
No later than seven and a half months after the initiation of the investigation pursuant to Article 6 the Commission shall consult the Member States on the basis of the findings of the investigation.
Če je tako, lahko Komisija v največ 8 mesecih po začetku preiskave podaljša to časovno obdobje za največ 15 mesecev .
If so the Commission may decide, no later than 8 months after the initiation of the investigation, to extend the time limit for a period up to, but in no case longer than, 15 months.
Če se pregled, ki se izvaja v skladu z odstavkom 2, začne med tem, ko v istem postopku poteka že pregled v skladu z odstavkom 3, se pregled v skladu z odstavkom 3 zaključi istočasno kot pregled v skladu z odstavkom 2.
If a review carried out pursuant to paragraph 2 is initiated while a review under paragraph 3 in ongoing in the same proceeding, the review pursuant to paragraph 3 shall be concluded at the same time as the review pursuant to paragraph 2.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 8 – točka c
Annex – section 24 – point 8 – point c
Komisija začne pregled v skladu s tem členom.
Reviews pursuant to this Article shall be initiated by the Commission.
Kadar je to upravičeno s pregledi, se ukrepi prekličejo ali obdržijo v skladu z odstavkom 2 oziroma prekličejo, obdržijo ali spremenijo v skladu s odstavkoma 3 in 4.
Where warranted by reviews, measures shall be repealed or maintained pursuant to paragraph 2, or repealed, maintained or amended pursuant to paragraphs 3 and 4.
Če se ukrepi prekličejo za posamezne izvoznike, ne pa za državo kot celoto, za take izvoznike še vedno velja postopek in se jih lahko ponovno pregleda pri vsakem naslednjem pregledu, ki se izvaja za navedeno državo v skladu s tem členom.
Where measures are repealed for individual exporters, but not for the country as a whole, such exporters shall remain subject to the proceeding and may, automatically, be reinvestigated in any subsequent review carried out for that country pursuant to this Article.
Komisija začne pregled v skladu s tem členom.
Reviews pursuant to this Article shall be initiated by the Commission .
Pred začetkom postopkov Komisija obvesti države članice in jim omogoči, da izrazijo svoje mnenje.
Before the initiation of proceedings the Commission shall inform the Member States thereof and give them the opportunity to express their views.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 9 – točka c
Annex – section 24 – point 9 – point c
Člen 12 – odstavek 4 – pododstavka 1 in 2
Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraphs 1 and 2
Ustrezne določbe členov 5 in 6 se uporabljajo za katero koli ponovno preiskavo, izvedeno na podlagi tega člena, pri tem pa se ta ponovna preiskava opravi kar najhitreje in se običajno zaključi v devetih mesecih od datuma začetka ponovne preiskave.
The relevant provisions of Articles 5 and 6 shall apply to any reinvestigation carried out pursuant to this Article, except that such reinvestigation shall be carried out expeditiously and shall normally be concluded within nine months of the date of initiation of the reinvestigation.
Vsekakor se take ponovne preiskave v vsakem primeru zaključijo v enem letu od začetka ponovne preiskave.
In any event, such reinvestigations shall in all cases be concluded within one year of initiation of the reinvestigation.
Ustrezne določbe členov 5 in 6 se uporabljajo za katero koli ponovno preiskavo, izvedeno na podlagi tega člena, pri tem pa se ta ponovna preiskava opravi kar najhitreje in se običajno zaključi v šestih mesecih od datuma začetka ponovne preiskave.
The relevant provisions of Articles 5 and 6 shall apply to any reinvestigation carried out pursuant to this Article, except that such reinvestigation shall be carried out expeditiously and shall normally be concluded within six months of the date of initiation of the reinvestigation.
Vsekakor se take ponovne preiskave v vsakem primeru zaključijo v desetih mesecih od začetka ponovne preiskave.
In any event, such reinvestigations shall in all cases be concluded within ten months of initiation of the reinvestigation.
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 11 – točka a
Annex – section 24 – point 11 – point a
Opustitev lahko Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 15(2) podaljša za največ eno leto.
The suspension may be extended for a further period, not exceeding one year, by the Commission acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 15(2).
Ukrepe je mogoče začasno opustiti le, če se razmere na trgu začasno spremenijo v tolikšni meri, da je malo verjetno, da bi se škoda zaradi opustitve nadaljevala, in če je imela industrija Unije možnost dati pripombe in so bile te pripombe upoštevane.
Measures may only be suspended where market conditions have temporarily changed to an extent that injury would be unlikely to resume as a result of the suspension, and provided that the Union industry has been given an opportunity to comment and these comments have been taken into account.
Ukrepe je mogoče kadar koli ponovno uvesti, če razlogi za opustitev ne veljajo več.
Measures may, at any time be reinstated if the reason for suspension is no longer applicable.
Opustitev lahko Komisija v skladu s svetovalnim postopkom iz člena 15(1a) podaljša za največ eno leto.
The suspension may be extended for a further period, not exceeding one year, by the Commission acting in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 15(1a).
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 12
Annex – section 24 – point 12
Zaradi hudega časovnega pritiska v postopkih je treba zagotoviti, da svetovalni in preiskovalni odbor ter odbor za pritožbe čim prej podajo svoja mnenja, ne da bi izgubljali čas.
In view of the extreme time pressure the procedures face it must be ensured that advisory and examination committee as well as the appeal body deliver their opinions as quick as possible.
Člen 15 – odstavek 4 b (novo)
Article 15 – paragraph 4 b (new)
Priloga – oddelek 24 – točka 15 a (novo)
Annex – section 24 – point 15 a (new)
Komisija ob ustreznem upoštevanju varstva zaupnih podatkov v smislu člena 19 Evropskemu parlamentu predstavi letno poročilo o uporabi in izvajanju te uredbe.
The Commission shall, with due regard to the protection of confidential information within the meaning of Article 19, present an annual report on the application and implementation of this Regulation to the European Parliament.
Poročilo mora vsebovati informacije o uporabi začasnih in končnih ukrepov, zaključku preiskav brez sprejetja ukrepov, ponovnih preiskavah, obiskih za namene revizije in preverjanja ter o dejavnostih različnih organov, odgovornih za nadzor izvajanja uredbe in izpolnjevanja obveznosti, izhajajočih iz nje.
The report shall include information about the application of provisional and definitive measures, the termination of investigations without measures, reinvestigations, reviews and verification visits, and the activities of the various bodies responsible for monitoring the implementation of the Regulation and fulfilment of the obligations arising therefrom.
S tem predlogom uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi nekaterih uredb o skupni trgovinski politiki v zvezi s postopki za sprejetje nekaterih ukrepov (Omnibus I) naj bi se 26 uredb na področju skupne trgovinske politike prilagodilo novim določbam primarne zakonodaje iz Lizbonske pogodbe.
The proposal under consideration for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending certain regulations relating to the common commercial policy as regards the procedures for the adoption of certain measures (Omnibus I) is intended to bring 26 trade-policy regulations into line with the new primary-law provisions of the Lisbon Treaty.
Zlasti gre za prilagoditev uredb zahtevam iz členov 290 in 291 PDEU ter določbam Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi splošnih pravil in načel, na podlagi katerih države članice nadzirajo izvajanje izvedbenih pooblastil Komisije, ki izhaja iz tretjega odstavka člena 291 PDEU.
More specifically, it serves to align the regulations with Articles 290 and 291 of the TFEU and with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers, which was prompted by Article 291(3) of the TFEU.
S členom 290 PDEU je bil v evropsko pravo prvič vnesen institut delegiranih aktov.
Article 290 of the TFEU for the first time introduces delegated acts into European law.
Zakonodajna oblast lahko v skladu s tem pooblastila za zakonodajne akte, ki niso bistvenega pomena, prenese na izvršilno oblast.
The legislature may therefore delegate non-essential legislative acts to the executive.
Zakonodajna oblast pri tem obdrži pravico, da lahko prenos pooblastil kadar koli prekliče in potem sama sprejme odločitev.
The legislature retains the power to revoke the delegation at any time and thus take the relevant decision itself.
Poleg tega lahko vsako odločitev, sprejeto v okviru prenosa pooblastil, prekliče z vetom.
In addition, any decision taken in the form of a delegated act may be vetoed by the legislature.
Zadošča že, če Svet ali Parlament nasprotuje predlogu odločbe Komisije.
It is sufficient for either the Council or Parliament to object to a Commission proposal for a decision.
V členu 291 PDEU je določeno sprejetje tako imenovanih izvedbenih določb.
Article 291 TFEU, on the other hand, is concerned with the adoption of implementing provisions.
Z njimi naj bi se zagotovilo usklajeno izvajanje evropskega prava v vseh državah članicah.
These are intended to ensure that European law is transposed uniformly in all Member States.
Skupaj z delegiranimi akti te določbe nadomeščajo stari postopek komitologije iz Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999.
In conjunction with delegated acts, they replace the old ‘comitology’ procedure provided for by Council Decision of 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999.
Konkretna podlaga izvedbenih določb je določena v Uredbi (EU) št. 182/2011.
The specific arrangements for administering implementing provisions are governed by Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.
V njej so za sprejetje potrebnih izvedbenih aktov predvideni svetovalni postopek (člen 4), postopek pregleda (člen 5), pritožbeni postopek (člen 6) in neposredno veljavne izvedbene določbe (člen 8).
For the purpose of adopting the necessary implementing acts it makes provision for an advisory procedure (Article 4), examination procedure (Article 5), appeal procedure (Article 6) and immediately applicable implementing acts (Article 8).
V nujnih primerih se uporablja zadnji postopek.
In urgent cases, the latter procedure is to apply.
Sicer pa sta svetovalni postopek in postopek pregleda osnova za izvedbene akte.
Otherwise the advisory and examination procedures are the basis for implementing acts.
Postopka se razlikujeta po intenzivnosti sodelovanja držav članic v postopkih Komisije.
The two procedures differ as regards the intensity of the Member States’ involvement in the Commission procedures.
Pri postopku pregleda pa lahko države članice s kvalificirano večino ustavijo predlog Komisije.
Under the examination procedure, on the other hand, a qualified majority of the Member States may block a Commission proposal.
V izjemnih primerih, med katere sodi tudi trgovinska politika, za to zadostuje celo navadna večina.
In special cases, which include trade policy, a simple majority is even sufficient here.
V takem primeru se mora Komisija potruditi za sprejem predlogov sprememb, da omogoči pozitiven končni rezultat.
In this case the Commission must seek to incorporate proposed amendments in order to attain a positive end-result.
Če pri postopku pregleda ni mogoče doseči soglasja, se uporabi pritožbeni postopek.
In case no agreement is reached during the examination procedure, an appeal procedure is provided for.
Pri tem postopku lahko države članice predlog Komisije v vseh primerih ustavijo samo s kvalificirano večino.
Here, Member States may only block a Commission proposal by a qualified majority; this applies in all cases.
Predloženi osnutek uredbe Komisije je namenjen nadomestitvi sedanjih postopkov odločanja za posamezne izvedbene ukrepe iz 26 uredb z delegiranimi akti ali izvedbenimi akti.
The Commission’s proposal for a regulation has the purpose of replacing the decision-making procedures for the various implementing measures – which have hitherto been laid down by 26 regulations – with delegated acts or implementing acts.
Zadevne uredbe so večinoma ureditve, ki omogočajo uporabo ukrepov trgovinske zaščite.
The majority of the regulations concerned permit the adoption of trade-policy safeguard measures.
Poleg Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 597/2009 o zaščiti proti subvencioniranemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti, Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1225/2009 o zaščiti proti dampinškemu uvozu iz držav, ki niso članice Evropske skupnosti, Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 260/2009 o skupnih pravilih za uvoz in Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1061/2009 o skupnih pravilih za izvoz so to predvsem uredbe o uporabi zaščitnih ukrepov, ki so bile normirane v zvezi z dvostranskimi trgovinskimi sporazumi s tretjimi državami.
Apart from Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, Council Regulation (EC) No 260/2009 on the common rules for imports and Council Regulation (EC) No 1061/2009 establishing common rules for exports, these are mostly regulations on the application of safeguard measures for which provision has been made in conjunction with bilateral trade agreements with third countries.
Mednje sodijo Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov in nekatere druge uredbe, ki omogočajo prilagajanje instrumentov trgovinske zaščite, npr. z eno odločitvijo v postopku reševanja sporov v okviru WTO.
Additional measures are Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP) and a number of further regulations making it possible to amend trade policy safeguard instruments, for example in connection with a decision in a WTO dispute settlement procedure.
V skladu z vsemi temi uredbami sedaj končne odločitve, npr. o uporabi ukrepov trgovinske zaščite, sprejema Svet Evropske unije.
In all these regulations, the power to take a final decision, for example regarding the use of trade-policy safeguard measures, currently lies with the Council.
Svet odločitve odobri in jih po potrebi brani pred Sodiščem Evropske unije.
The Council authorises the decisions and if necessary also defends them before the Court of Justice.
Posamezni postopki odločanja so natančno določeni v različnih uredbah.
The respective decision-making procedures are laid down specifically in the various regulations.
S temi posebnimi mehanizmi odločanja je bila evropska trgovinska politika pravzaprav izrecno izvzeta iz veljavnih postopkov komitologije.
As a result of these specific decision-making procedures, European trade policy has hitherto, essentially, been explicitly excluded from the comitology procedures.