natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju pravno zavezujoče narave Listine o temeljnih pravicah,
having regard to the legally binding character of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. aprila 2008 o kulturnih panogah v Evropi UL C 247 E, 15.10.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 10 April 2008 on cultural industries in Europe OJ C 247 E, 15.10.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 25. junija 2008 o aktu za mala podjetja za Evropo, s katerim je bilo oblikovano načelo „najprej pomisli na male“ za velikopotezen program politike za mala in srednja podjetja,
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 25 June 2008 on the Small Business Act for Europe establishing the ‘Think Small First’ principle for an ambitious policy agenda for SMEs,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A7-0175/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0175/2010 ),
ker kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine lahko dejansko ogrozijo zdravje in varnost potrošnikov, pa tudi naše gospodarstvo in družbo,
whereas infringements of intellectual property rights (IPR) constitute a genuine threat not only to consumer health and safety but also to our economies and societies,
ker znanstvene in tehnične inovacije, patenti in kulturne panoge zagotavljajo odločilen prispevek h konkurenčnosti evropskega gospodarstva, tako s številom in raznolikostjo delovnih mest, ki jih ponujajo, kot tudi z bogastvom, ki ga ustvarijo; ker je treba kulturno gospodarstvo podpirati od nastanka do distribucije,
whereas scientific and technical innovation, patents and the cultural industries make a decisive contribution to the competitiveness of the European economy, both through the number and diversity of the job openings they provide and through the wealth created; whereas the cultural economy, from creation through to distribution, must be supported,
ker Evropsko unijo kot članico Svetovne trgovinske organizacije zavezuje sporazum o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS); ker so države članice EU s tem zavezane k sprejetju in izvajanju učinkovitih ukrepov proti vsem kršitvam pravic intelektualne lastnine,
whereas the European Union, as a member of the World Trade Organisation, is bound by the Agreement on Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS); whereas EU Member States are thereby committed to the adoption and implementation of effective measures against all infringements of IPRs,
ker sta izmenjava znanja in razširjanje inovacij močni tradiciji v Evropski uniji; ker je dostop čim večjega števila ljudi do tehnološkega napredka in kulturnih izdelkov še naprej temelj izobraževalne in razvojne politike,
whereas knowledge sharing and dissemination of innovation are strong traditions in the European Union; whereas access by the greatest possible number to technological progress and cultural products continues to be the foundation of education and development policy,
ker je za ustrezno zaščito vprašanja uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine pomembno, da se ne upošteva zgolj ozemlje EU, temveč tudi razmere na zunanjih mejah EU in v tretjih državah, da se zagotovi združljivost med zaščito vsebin, ki izvirajo iz Skupnosti, in imetnikov pravic do teh vsebin ter dostopom potrošnikov do vsebin, ki ne izvirajo iz Skupnosti,
whereas in order properly to address the question of IPR enforcement in the internal market, it is important to take into consideration not only EU territory but also the situation at the EU's external borders and in third countries, in order to ensure compatibility between the protection of content of Community origin and the holders of rights thereto and consumer access to non-Community content,
ker so podatki o obsegu kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine nedosledni, nepopolni, nezadostni in razpršeni in ker je za morebitne dodatne zakonodajne predloge potrebna nepristranska in neodvisna ocena učinka,
whereas data concerning the scale of IPR infringements are inconsistent, incomplete, insufficient and dispersed, and whereas an objective, independent impact assessment is needed for any additional legislative proposal,
ker inovativnost in ustvarjalnost prinašata precejšnjo dodano vrednost za evropsko gospodarstvo in je zato prav, da ju ob upoštevanju gospodarskih razmer ohranjamo in razvijamo,
whereas innovation and creativity have considerable added value for the European economy and, taking account of the economic context, they should be preserved and developed,
ker so kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine horizontalne narave in zadevajo vse industrijske panoge, zlasti ustvarjalne in inovativne, ter šport,
whereas the violation of IPRs is a problem across the board which affects all sectors of industry, particularly the creative and innovative industries and sport,
ker bodo nadaljnje kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine privedle do zatona inovacij v EU,
whereas ongoing infringements of IPRs will lead to a fade-out of innovation in the EU,
ker je pojav spletnih kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine dosegel skrb zbujajoče razsežnosti, zlasti v industrijskih panogah z ustvarjalnimi vsebinami, in ker še ni bilo ugotovljeno, ali je veljavni pravni okvir sposoben učinkovito zaščititi imetnike pravic v internetu in hkrati vzpostaviti ravnotežje med vsemi interesi, tudi interesi potrošnikov,
whereas the phenomenon of on-line IPR infringements has assumed worrying proportions, particularly for the creative content industries, and whereas it has not been established yet whether the existing legal framework is capable of effectively protecting rights holders on the Internet while guaranteeing a balance between all the interests at stake, including those of consumers,
ker morajo prizadevanja za boj proti kršenju avtorskih pravic uživati podporo javnosti, da se ne bi zmanjšala podpora pravicam intelektualne lastnine med državljani,
whereas efforts to tackle infringement of copyright must enjoy public support in order not to risk eroding support for intellectual property rights amongst the citizens,
ker je nepooblaščeno prenašanje avtorsko zaščitenega gradiva v splet nedvomna kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in je prepovedano s pogodbo o avtorskih pravicah (WCT) in pogodbo o izvedbah in fonogramih (WPTT) Svetovne organizacije za intelektualno lastnino (WIPO), katere pogodbenica je Evropska unija,
whereas the unauthorised uploading of copyrighted material to the Internet is a clear infringement of intellectual property rights and is prohibited by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) treaties on copyright (WCT) and performances and phonograms (WPPT), to which the European Union is a contracting party,
ker bi ustvarjalni sektor moral nadaljevati razvoj modelov, ki omogočajo spletni dostop do ustvarjalnih vsebin, kar potrošnikom ponuja pestrejšo in cenovno ugodnejšo izbiro, vključno z dostopom do neomejenih naročniških storitev; ker je razvoj teh zakonitih storitev omejen zaradi rasti nezakonito prenesenih spletnih vsebin,
whereas the creative sector should continue to develop models enabling access to creative content online which offer improved and cost-effective choices to consumers, including access to unlimited subscription services; whereas the development of these legal services is inhibited by the growth of unlawfully uploaded content online,
ker morajo imeti ustvarjalci avdiovizualnih nosilcev podatkov, da bi ohranili in povečali privlačnost svoje ponudbe za javnost, možnost, da uporabijo vse nove načine distribucije; ker je treba zdajšnji sistem podeljevanja licenc izboljšati na način, da bodo države članice imele na voljo prožen sistem, ki ga bo mogoče prilagajati novim tehnologijam,
whereas, in order to maintain and increase the attractiveness of what they can offer their public, producers of audiovisual media must be in a position to use all the new means of distribution; whereas the current system of granting licences must be improved in such a way that the Member States have a flexible system available to them which can be adapted to the new technologies,
ker z izjemo zakonodaje o kazenskih sankcijah sicer že obstaja skupni pravni okvir za ponarejanje in piratstvo materialnih dobrin, obstajajo pa vrzeli glede boja proti kršenju pravic intelektualne lastnine v spletu,
whereas, with the exception of legislation on penalties under the criminal law, a Community legal framework already exists with regard to the phenomenon of counterfeiting and piracy of physical goods, but whereas lacunae persist with regard to online IPR infringements,
ker ukrepi iz Direktive 2004/48/ES o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine na notranjem trgu niso bili še nikoli ocenjeni z vidika varovanja pravic ali z vidika njihovih učinkov za pravice potrošnikov,
whereas the measures provided for by Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights on the internal market have not yet been assessed, from the point of view of the protection of rights or from the point of view of its effects on consumers' rights,
ker je bil regulativni okvir za telekomunikacije nedavno spremenjen in vključuje določbe za standardizirane informacije v javnem interesu, ki med drugim lahko obravnavajo avtorske pravice in njihove kršitve, ne da bi bile pri tem ogrožene pravice glede varstva podatkov in zasebnosti, ter poudarja potrebo po spoštovanju temeljnih pravic v zadevah, povezanih z dostopom do interneta,
whereas the telecoms regulatory framework has recently been amended, includes provisions for standardised public interest notices which can address, among other things, copyright and infringement thereof without jeopardising data protection and privacy rights and stresses the need to respect fundamental rights in matters relating to Internet access,
ker je treba v evropskem pravnem okviru zagotoviti možnost pregona kršiteljev avtorskih pravic, saj mednarodne pogodbe le stežka obravnavajo kršitve pravic intelektualne lastnine,
whereas the possibility should be created in the European legal framework of proceeding against infringers of copyright, since international treaties are barely able to address IPR infringements,
ker je varovanje patentov bistvenega pomena za učinkovito preprečevanje njihovih kršitev; ker vprašanje enotnega patentnega sistema na ravni EU še ni rešeno,
whereas, in the case of patents, their protection is crucial in order to efficiently fight patent violations; whereas the question of the unified patent system at EU level has yet to be resolved,
ker je dokazano, da obstajajo povezave med različnimi oblikami organiziranega kriminala in kršitvami pravic intelektualne lastnine,
whereas there are proven connections between various forms of organised crime and IPR infringements,
ker Lizbonska pogodba Evropskemu parlamentu zagotavlja pristojnost soodločanja v gospodarskih zadevah in dostop do pogajalske dokumentacije,
whereas the co-decision role of the European Parliament in commercial matters and its access to negotiation documents is guaranteed by the Lisbon Treaty,
ker je zaželeno, da se poleg ukrepov za preprečevanje kršitev na tem področju zagotovi tudi varstvo potrošnikov, ki zakonito uporabljajo proizvode, zaščitene kot intelektualna lastnina,
whereas it is desirable that, alongside measures to prevent offences in this area, protection should be provided for consumers who legally make use of products that are covered by protection of intellectual property,
ker zdajšnje pravo Skupnosti ne ovira razvoja sistema podeljevanja večozemeljskih licenc,
whereas current Community law constitutes no impediment to the development of multi-territory licensing systems,
ker na različnih področjih, vključno z besedilnim in slikovnim sektorjem, obstajajo poslovni modeli in kanali ter sistemi podeljevanja licenc, ki zagotavljajo širok dostop do del v najrazličnejših oblikah, tako znotraj kot zunaj nacionalnih meja,
whereas in various areas, including the text- and image-based sector, there are business models and channels and licensing schemes that provide broad access to works in a wide range of forms and formats, both within and across national borders,
izraža zadovoljstvo s sporočilom Komisije z dne 11. septembra 2009 o dodatnih nezakonodajnih ukrepih; vendar obžaluje, da sporočilo ne obravnava dopolnitve zakonodajnega okvira z nizom ukrepov za učinkovit boj proti kršitvam pravic intelektualne lastnine; pozdravlja napredek, ki je bil v EU dosežen pri usklajevanju boja proti ponarejanju; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja na področjih, ki so občutljiva z vidika zdravja in varnosti, vključno s področjem zdravil;
Welcomes the communication of 11 September 2009 from the Commission concerning additional non-legislative measures; regrets however that the communication does not deal with the matter of completing the legislative framework by introducing a set of measures to combat intellectual property right infringements in an effective manner; welcomes the progress made in the EU in harmonising the fight against counterfeiting; encourages the Commission to step up its efforts in areas that are sensitive in terms of health and safety, including that of medicines;
opozarja, da na kulturnem področju obstaja izjema pri pravicah intelektualne lastnine: „izvod za zasebno rabo“;
Recalls that an exception to IPRs exists in the cultural area: the ‘private copy’;
poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2010 nujno pripravi celovito strategijo o pravicah intelektualne lastnine, ki bo obravnavala vse vidike teh pravic, tudi njihovo uveljavljanje in pospeševanje, zlasti vlogo avtorskih pravic kot dejavnika, ki omogoča in ne ovira, ter sredstva, ki ustvarjalcem omogoča preživljanje in razširjanje njihovih del;
Calls on the Commission to urgently present, by the end of 2010, a comprehensive IPR strategy addressing all aspects of IPRs, including their enforcement as well as their promotion, in particular the role of copyright as an enabler and not an obstacle, helping creators earn a living and disseminating their works;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga celovito strategijo o pravicah intelektualne lastnine, ki bo odpravila ovire pri oblikovanju enotnega trga v spletu ter bo evropski zakonodajni okvir na področju pravic intelektualne lastnine prilagodila sodobnim družbenim težnjam in tehničnemu razvoju;
Calls on the Commission to propose a comprehensive strategy on IPRs which will remove obstacles to creating a single market in the online environment and adapt the European legislative framework in the field of IPRs to current trends in society as well as to technical developments;
poudarja, da morajo vsi ukrepi, sprejeti v podporo pravicam intelektualne lastnine, spoštovati Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, še zlasti njena člena 7 in 8, ter Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, še zlasti njene člene 6, 8 in 10, prav tako pa morajo biti potrebni, sorazmerni in ustrezni znotraj demokratične družbe; v zvezi s tem opozarja, da člen 17 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah predvideva varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine;
Stresses that any measures taken to enforce IPRs must respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Article 7 and Article 8, and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, in particular Article 6, Article 8, and Article 10, and be necessary, proportionate, and appropriate within a democratic society; recalls in this connection that Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides for the protection of intellectual property;
ocenjuje, da bi morala Komisija vidike pravic intelektualne lastnine upoštevati v vseh zadevnih politikah in zakonodajnih pobudah ter v vseh ocenah učinkov predlogov, ki bi lahko vplivali na intelektualno lastnino;
Considers that the Commission should take IPR aspects into account in all relevant policies or legislative initiatives and consider these aspects in all processes relating to impact assessments where a proposal would have an impact on intellectual property;
meni, da bi Komisija morala upoštevati posebne težave, s katerimi se srečujejo mala in srednja podjetja pri uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine, kar bi ustrezalo načelu „najprej pomisli na male“, ki ga uvaja akt za mala podjetja za Evropo, med drugim z uporabo načela nediskriminacije za mala in srednja podjetja;
Takes the view that the Commission should take into account the specific problems encountered by SMEs when it comes to reinforcing the intellectual property rights corresponding to the principle of ‘Think Small First’ established by the Small Business Act for Europe, inter alia by applying the principle of non-discrimination for SMEs;
se ob upoštevanju izkušenj imetnikov pravic v nekaterih državah članicah ne strinja s Komisijo in njenim prepričanjem, da so veljavni predpisi EU s področja civilnega uveljavljanja pravic učinkoviti in usklajeni v takšnem obsegu, da omogočajo pravilno delovanje notranjega trga, in Komisijo opozarja, da je poročilo o uporabi direktive 2004/48/ES zelo pomembno za potrditev teh trditev;
In the light of the experiences undergone by rights-holders in some Member States, does not share the Commission's certitude that the current civil enforcement framework in the EU is effective and harmonised to the extent necessary for the proper functioning of the internal market and reminds the Commission that the report on the application of Directive 2004/48/EC is essential to confirm those claims;
meni, da je treba v evropskem pravnem okviru zagotoviti možnost pregona kršiteljev pravic intelektualne lastnine, in opozarja Komisijo, da je poročilo o uporabi direktive 2004/48/ES zelo pomembno za potrditev teh trditev;
Is of the opinion that the possibility of proceeding against infringers of intellectual property rights should be created in the European legal framework and reminds the Commission that the report on the application of Directive 2004/48/EC is essential to confirm those claims;
poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s členom 18(1) direktive 2004/48/ES pripravi poročilo o uporabi te direktive, vključno z oceno učinkovitosti sprejetih ukrepov, pa tudi ovrednotenjem njenega učinka na inovacije in razvoj informacijske družbe, ter naj po potrebi pripravi njene spremembe; poziva, naj se v poročilo vključi tudi ocena načinov za krepitev in nadgradnjo pravnega okvira za področje interneta;
Calls on the Commission to draw up a report on the application of Directive 2004/48/EC, including an assessment of the effectiveness of the measures taken, as well as an evaluation of its impact on innovation and the development of the information society, in accordance with Article 18(1) of that Directive and, if necessary, to propose amendments; calls for that report also to include an assessment of the ways to strengthen and upgrade the legal framework with respect to the Internet;
je seznanjen s tem, da obstajajo posebne oblike zapisa, ki invalidom omogočajo dostop do del, in poziva, naj se sprejme potrebne ukrepe za njihovo širjenje;
Take account of the existence of particular formats making works accessible for those with disabilities and adopt the necessary measures to promote the distribution thereof;
se ne strinja s stališčem Komisije, da je glavni del predpisov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine že sprejet; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da pogajanja o direktivi o kazenskih sankcijah niso bila uspešna;
Does not share the Commission's view that the principal body of laws with respect to IPR enforcement is already in place; points out in this respect that negotiations on the directive on criminal sanctions have not been successfully concluded;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da ukrepi, namenjeni okrepljeni uporabi pravic intelektualne lastnine na notranjem trgu, ne bodo vplivali na zakonito pravico do medopravilnosti, ki je bistvenega pomena za zdravo konkurenco na trgu distribucije digitalnih del, med drugim za avtorje in uporabnike brezplačne programske opreme;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the measures aimed at strengthening the application of intellectual property rights in the internal market do not impinge on the legitimate right to interoperability, this being essential to healthy competition on the digital works distribution market, inter alia for the authors and users of free software;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi ustrezne zakonodajne predloge, ki bodo temeljili na členu 118 PDEU in bodo obravnavali vprašanje učinkovitega patentnega sistema EU, in v zvezi s tem kot pomemben pozitiven razvoj pozdravlja sklepe Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2009 o izboljšanem patentnem sistemu za Evropo;
Calls on the Commission to put forward appropriate legislative proposals based on Article 118 of the TFEU which will address the issue of an effective EU patent system and welcomes in this respect the Council conclusions of 4 December 2009 on an enhanced patent system in Europe as a significant positive development;
Opazovalni urad EU za boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu („opazovalni urad“)
European Observatory on Counterfeiting and Piracy (‘the Observatory’)
priznava, da so izčrpne in zanesljive informacije in podatki o vseh vrstah kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine zelo pomembni za oblikovanje politike, ki bo temeljila na dokazih in bo ciljno naravnana;
Recognises the importance of comprehensive and reliable information and data on all types of IPR infringements for the development of evidence-based and result-oriented policy making;
izraža zadovoljstvo z ustanovitvijo opazovalnega urada kot orodja za centralizacijo statističnih podatkov in podatkov, ki bodo služili kot podlaga za usmerjanje predlogov, ki jih bo treba sprožiti za učinkovito preprečevanje ponarejanja in piratstva, vključno s spletnimi kršitvami pravic intelektualne lastnine; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi poročilo, kako najbolje uporabiti Europol in obstoječe strukture na tem področju za sodelovanje med carinskimi organi za učinkovit boj proti kaznivim kršitvam intelektualne lastnine;
Welcomes the establishment of the Observatory as a tool for the centralisation of statistics and data which will serve as a basis for proposals to be implemented to combat effectively the phenomena of counterfeiting and online IPR infringements; urges the Commission to produce a report on how best to use Europol and existing structures for cooperation between customs authorities in this field to combat criminal IPR infringements effectively;
želi, da bi opazovalni urad postal orodje za zbiranje in izmenjavo podatkov in informacij o vseh oblikah kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine, med drugim za zbiranje znanstvenih raziskav o ponarejanju in ureditvi pravic intelektualne lastnine;
Wishes the Observatory to become a tool for collecting and exchanging data and information on all forms of all IPR infringements, including compiling scientific research on counterfeiting and IPR regulation;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kakšne naloge bodo dodeljene opazovalnemu uradu, in poudarja, da bo uspeh urada v veliki meri odvisen od vključenosti in sodelovanja vseh dejavnikov, med drugim nacionalnih organov, imetnikov pravic, organizacij potrošnikov in industrijskih panog, ki jih to zadeva, saj bo to prispevalo k večji preglednosti in bo preprečilo podvajanje naporov;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the tasks which are to be entrusted to the Observatory and stresses that the success of the Observatory largely depends on the involvement and cooperation of all stakeholders, including the national authorities, rights holders, consumers' organisations and the industries concerned, in order to increase transparency and avoid duplication of effort;