natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da mora zakonodaja, ki je nastala na podlagi poglavja III Pogodbe Euratom (varovanje zdravja), ostati v pristojnosti Evropske unije za zagotovitev, da se osnovni standardi za varstvo delavcev in širše javnosti uporabljajo in razširijo na okolje, ter da zakonodaja na razvojni način upošteva rezultate mednarodnih znanstvenih študij;
Considers that the legislation developed under Chapter III of the Euratom Treaty (on health protection) must remain under the responsibility of the European Union in order to ensure that basic standards for the protection of workers and the general public are applied and extended to include the environment, and that it takes account in an evolutionary way of the results of international scientific studies;
poudarja, da področje uporabe te zakonodaje ni omejeno samo na območja z jedrskimi obrati, ampak danes zajema tudi zaščito sosednjih držav članic in držav izven Evropske unije, in sicer zaradi stalnega nadzora odlaganja radioaktivnih odpadkov ter sprejetja predpisov o transportu izrabljenega goriva in radioaktivnih odpadkov, o zaščiti prehrambene verige in radiološki nevarnosti;
Points out that the scope of such legislation is not confined to the regions where nuclear plants operate but now also includes the protection of neighbouring Member States and countries outside the European Union, as a result of the constant checks on discharges of radioactive waste and the adoption of rules on the transfer of spent fuels and radioactive waste, on protection of the food chain, and on radiological emergencies;
ugotavlja, da je namen poglavja IV Pogodbe Euratom (Naložbe) pridobiti natančne informacije na ravni Skupnosti o naložbenih programih držav članic;
Notes that Chapter IV of the Euratom Treaty (on investment) was designed to obtain detailed information, at Community level, on the Member States" investment plans;
vendar ugotavlja, da Komisija ob objavi usmeritvenih jedrskih programov Skupnosti ni dejansko ocenila potreb po jedrskih naložbah, zlasti glede na probleme pri zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo, boju proti podnebnim spremembam ter konkurenčnosti Evropske unije ob upoštevanju oživitve jedrske industrije po vsem svetu;
Notes, however, that when publishing its Illustrative Nuclear Programmes (PINCs) the Commission did not really assess nuclear investment needs with particular regard to the problems of security of energy supply, the fight against climate change and the European Union's competitiveness in the light of the worldwide revival of the nuclear industry;
vendar pozdravlja v Pogodbi Euratom navedeno obveznost obveščanja o vsaki novi naložbi na jedrskem področju v Evropi, kar omogoča tudi izdelavo zemljevida vseh jedrskih dejavnostih Evropske unije, ta obveznost pa je specifična za evropsko jedrsko industrijo;
Welcomes, however, the existence in the Euratom Treaty of the requirement to provide details of any new investment in Europe in the nuclear domain, thus making it possible to have a complete cartography of the European Union's nuclear activities – a requirement specific to the European nuclear industry;
ocenjuje, da bodo skupna podjetja (poglavje V Pogodbe Euratom) uporabno orodje za izvajanje javne politike, zlasti na področju raziskav, kjer je bil ta pravni instrument uporabljen že večkrat, zlasti pri ustanovitvi skupnega evropskega projekta Torus leta 1978 v Culhamu in nedavni vzpostavitvi evropskega pravnega subjekta za izgradnjo mednarodnega termonuklearnega poskusnega reaktorja (ITER);
Considers that joint undertakings (Chapter V of the Euratom Treaty) will have been valuable instruments for implementing public policies, particularly in the research field, where this legal instrument has been used on a number of occasions, particularly with the establishment of the Joint European Torus at Culham in 1978 and, more recently, the introduction of the European Legal Entity to implement the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER);
ocenjuje, da ima Pogodba Euratom z ustanovitvijo Agencije (poglavje VI), odgovorne za oskrbo uporabnikov v Uniji v skladu z načelom enakega dostopa do snovi, na voljo instrument, ki je nujno potreben v času razmisleka o zanesljivosti oskrbe z energijo;
Considers that the Euratom Treaty has at its disposal, with the creation of an Agency (Chapter VI) responsible for supplying users within the Union in accordance with the principle of equal access to materials, an instrument that is essential in these times of preoccupation with the security of the energy supply;
meni, da so nadzorni ukrepi (poglavje VII) eden od največjih dosežkov izvajanja Pogodbe Euratom in dajejo Komisiji možnost za natančnejše poznavanje zalog in tokov jedrskih snovi v Evropski uniji;
Considers that safeguards (Chapter VII) are one of the major successes of the Euratom Treaty's application and provide the Commission with the means of ascertaining the stocks and movements of nuclear materials in the European Union;
ugotavlja, da dajejo ti nadzorni ukrepi državam dobaviteljicam jedrskih snovi resnično zagotovilo glede uporabe teh snovi ter so dopolnilo nadzoru Mednarodne agencije za atomsko energijo (IAEA) nad neširjenjem teh snovi;
Notes that these safeguards also provide a real guarantee for countries that supply nuclear materials as to the use of those materials, complementing the non-proliferation controls of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA);
ugotavlja, da je na podlagi poglavja X Pogodbe Euratom (Zunanji odnosi) pristop Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo k več mednarodnim konvencijam, zlasti h Konvenciji o jedrski varnosti ter Skupni konvenciji o varnosti ravnanja z izrabljenim jedrskim gorivom in o varnosti ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki, omogočil Skupnosti sodelovanje v mednarodnih prizadevanjih pri teh vprašanjih in spodbujanje pomembnega napredka v Evropski uniji;
Notes that, on the basis of Chapter X of the Euratom Treaty (on external relations), the Euratom's accession to a number of international conventions, in particular the Convention on Nuclear Safety and the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management, has enabled the Community to participate in international effort on these issues and to promote the important advances achieved in the European Union;
prav tako ugotavlja, da je Evropska skupnost za atomsko energijo na podlagi poglavja X Pogodbe Euratom sklenila številne sporazume o sodelovanju na področju raziskav, sodelovala v mednarodnih projektih, kot je Forum IV. generacije o prihodnjih reaktorskih sistemih, in vodila mednarodna pogajanja o projektu ITER;
Recalls also that it is on the basis of Chapter X of the Euratom Treaty that the Euratom has concluded a number of cooperation agreements in the field of research, participated in international projects such as the Generation IV International Forum on future nuclear reactors, and conducted the international negotiations on the ITER Project;
ugotavlja, da glavne določbe Pogodbe Euratom niso bile spremenjene od 1. januarja 1958, ko je pogodba začela veljati;
Notes that the main provisions of the Euratom Treaty have not been amended since it entered into force on 1 January 1958;
potrjuje, da se mora v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti vsaka država članica odločiti, ali bo uporabljala jedrsko energijo ali ne;
Confirms that in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, it is for each and every Member State to decide whether or not to rely on nuclear energy;
nadalje ugotavlja, da nekatere države članice, ki odkrito nasprotujejo jedrski energiji in so se pridružile Skupnostima (Evropski skupnosti in Skupnosti Euratom), niso bile nikoli kakorkoli dolžne razvijati jedrsko energijo na svojem ozemlju; v skladu s tem ugotavlja, da že veliko let velja, da Pogodba Euratom pri spodbujanju jedrske energije ne nalaga obveznosti, ampak vzpostavlja pravni okvir na voljo vsem;
Notes, furthermore, that some Member States which are plainly opposed to nuclear energy and have joined the Communities (the European Community and Euratom) have never in any way been required to develop nuclear energy on their territory; notes, accordingly, that it has been accepted for many years that the Euratom Treaty, in promoting nuclear energy, imposes no obligation, but establishes a legal framework for all to use;
poudarja, da Pogodba Euratom ne zavira razvoja notranjega trga za elektriko, še manj pa ovira prosti pretok blaga, oseb in kapitala; s tem v zvezi opozarja, da se skupno pravo Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti nanaša na jedrske dejavnosti in ugotavlja, da na primer pretok jedrskih snovi, opreme in tehnologije znotraj in zunaj Evropske unije urejajo pravila o nadzoru snovi "z dvojno uporabo", sprejeta na osnovi trgovinske politike iz Pogodbe ES; dodaja, da za zakonodajo Euratoma veljajo konkurenčno pravo in pravila o državni pomoči iz naslova VI Pogodbe ES; zato povzema, da Pogodba Euratom v nobenem primeru ne predstavlja zaščitniškega okvira za jedrsko energijo;
Emphasises that the Euratom Treaty does not hinder the development of an internal electricity market and is even less of an obstacle to the free movement of goods, persons and capital; points out, in that connection, that the ordinary law laid down by the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC Treaty) applies also to nuclear activities and notes, by way of example, that the movement of nuclear materials, equipment and technologies within and outside the European Union is covered by rules on the supervision of dual-use goods, adopted on the basis of the commercial policy laid down in the EC Treaty; adds that Euratom legislation is subject to competition law and regulations on State aid, as specified in Title VI of the EC Treaty; concludes, therefore, that the Euratom Treaty in no way represents a protectionist framework for nuclear energy;
ugotavlja, da ponuja Pogodba Euratom državam, ki so izbrale jedrsko možnost, instrumente za razvoj (skupna podjetja, podpora raziskavam in razvoju, posojila Euratom), vendar dostopnosti teh instrumentov dodaja čvrst pravni okvir (o varovanju zdravja, nadzornih ukrepih, preskrbi), da pomiri države članice, ki niso izbrale te možnosti;
Notes that the Euratom Treaty offers countries that have chosen the nuclear option the instruments for its development (joint undertakings, support for research and development, and Euratom loans) but accompanies the provision of these instruments with a dense legal framework (on health protection, nuclear safeguards and supply), in order to reassure Member States that have not chosen that option;
ugotavlja, da pravni okvir Euratom v dobro Skupnosti velja tudi za države članice, ki ne pridobivajo jedrske energije, a imajo na svojem ozemlju raziskovalne jedrske reaktorje, ter tem državam članicam nudi instrumente (kot so okvirni programi za raziskave in razvoj Euratom), s katerimi lahko dobijo sredstva, na primer na področju medicinskih raziskav;
Recalls that the Euratom legal framework also applies, for the good of the Community, to Member States that generate no nuclear power but have nuclear research reactors on their territory, and offers such Member States instruments (such as the Euratom research and development framework programmes) enabling them to receive funding, for instance in the field of medical research;
meni, da se je bilo ne glede na razlike v mnenjih o jedrski energiji moč na osnovi določb Pogodbe Euratom izogniti širjenju jedrskih snovi, določbe o zdravju, varnosti in preprečevanju radioaktivnega onesnaževanja pa so zelo koristne in bi jih bilo treba skrbno uskladiti z določbami o zdravju in varnosti iz Pogodbe ES;
Considers that, irrespective of the diversity of views on nuclear energy, the provisions of the Euratom Treaty that have helped prevent the proliferation of nuclear materials, and those which address health, safety and the prevention of radiological contamination, have been highly beneficial and should be carefully co-ordinated with the health and safety provisions of the EC Treaty;
obžaluje, da se večje pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta in zlasti razširitev postopka soodločanja na večino evropske zakonodaje niso upoštevala pri Pogodbi Euratom; meni, da ima Evropski parlament ne glede na tehnični značaj navedene pogodbe pravico do uradnega sodelovanja pri besedilih, katerih pravna podlaga je Pogodba Euratom;
Regrets that the growth in Parliament's powers, and particularly their extension to include the codecision procedure for the adoption of the majority of European legislation, has not been taken into account in the Euratom Treaty; considers that, despite the Euratom Treaty's technical nature, Parliament is entitled to be formally involved in texts whose legal basis is the Euratom Treaty;
šteje dejstvo, da je Parlament skoraj povsem izključen iz zakonodajnega postopka, povezanega s Pogodbo Euratom, ter da je bil le pri enem od desetih poglavij Pogodbe sploh zaprošen za mnenje, za nesprejemljivo pomanjkanje demokratičnosti;
Sees as evidence of an unacceptable democratic deficit the fact that Parliament is almost completely excluded from the Euratom legislative process and that it is consulted, and no more, on only one of the ten chapters of the Euratom Treaty;
vseeno ugotavlja, da Evropski parlament prek Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma sodeluje pri pogajanjih o okvirnem programu Euratom za jedrske raziskave in usposabljanje (2007-2011) (Okvirni program Euratom za raziskave in razvoj); ugotavlja tudi glede na dokumente, ki so bili nedavno obravnavani v Odboru Evropskega parlamenta za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko (Okvirni program Euratom za raziskave in razvoj, Direktiva o čezmejnih pošiljkah radioaktivnih odpadkov in izrabljenega jedrskega goriva, instrument za jedrsko pomoč itd.), da Svet redno v celoti ali delno upošteva spremembe besedil Euratom, ki jih predlaga Evropski parlament, čeprav postopek predvideva samo posvetovanje z njim; vseeno meni, da to ni dovolj;
Notes, however, that the Parliament is associated, by means of an Interinstitutional Agreement, with the negotiations on the seventh framework programme of the Euratom for nuclear research and training activities (2007 to 2011) (Euratom 7FP); also notes, in the light of the documents most recently considered in the European Parliament's Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (Euratom 7FP, the directive on crossborder shipments of radioactive waste and spent fuel, the Instrument for Nuclear Assistance, etc.) that, although the procedure provides for Parliament only to be consulted, the amendments proposed by Parliament to Euratom texts are regularly taken into account, in whole or in part, by the Council; does not consider, however, that this can be regarded as sufficient;
poudarja pomen člena 203 Pogodbe Euratom, ker omogoča prilagodljivost – na primer z vzpostavitvijo instrumenta za jedrsko sodelovanje – pri izvajanju zakonodajnih pobud, ki prvotno niso bile predvidene v Pogodbi Euratom; meni, da je treba preučiti, kako je mogoče uporabiti člen 203 za oblikovanje novih pobud in po možnosti za prilagoditev Pogodbe Euratom;
Highlights the significance of Article 203 of the Euratom Treaty, in that it offers flexibility – as with the creation of the Instrument for Nuclear Cooperation – to undertake legislative initiatives not initially provided for in the Euratom Treaty; considers that there is a need to examine how Article 203 could be used to develop new initiatives and, possibly, to make adjustments to the Euratom Treaty;
obžaluje, da na področju jedrske varnosti, ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki in razgradnje jedrskih objektov ni usklajenih standardov z resnično dodano vrednostjo, zlasti v primerjavi z obstoječim mednarodnim okvirom;
Regrets the absence of a legislative corpus on harmonised standards for nuclear safety, the management of radioactive waste and the decommissioning of nuclear plants with real added value, particularly in comparison with the existing international framework;
poziva Komisijo, naj se zgleduje po izkušnjah pri izvajanju konvencij IAEA (Konvencije o jedrski varnosti ter Skupne konvencije o varnosti ravnanja z izrabljenim jedrskim gorivom in o varnosti ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki) ter naj upošteva ocene Agencije za jedrsko energijo pri OECD (NEA) o najbolj naprednih nacionalnih praksah na področju ravnanja z radioaktivnimi odpadki; ugotavlja, da usklajene pobude za oblikovanje skupnega pristopa k jedrski varnosti, kot jih izvaja Združenje zahodnoevropskih jedrskih upravnih organov (WENRA), verjetno prispevajo k oblikovanju zakonodajne podlage;
Calls on the Commission to draw on the experience gained from implementing the conventions governed by the IAEA (Convention on Nuclear Safety and the Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management) and to take account of the assessments, conducted by the OECD's Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), of the most advanced national practices in the field of radioactive waste management; notes that concerted initiatives, such as those carried out by the Western Europe Nuclear Regulators Association (WENRA), to develop a joint approach to nuclear safety, are likely to help with drawing up a basis for legislation;
ugotavlja, kot je potrdila navedena sodba Sodišča, v zadevi C-29/99
Notes that, as confirmed by the abovementioned judgment of the Court of Justice in Case C-29/99
da ima Komisija pristojnosti na področju jedrske varnosti na podlagi Pogodbe Euratom in je pristojna za predložitev predlogov na tem področju;
, the Commission has powers in the field of nuclear safety under the Euratom Treaty and that it is authorised to put forward proposals in this area;
ocenjuje, da je Pogodba Euratom kljub pomanjkljivostim sedaj še vedno nujen pravni okvir za države članice, ki želijo razviti svoje sektorje jedrske energije, pa tudi za države članice, ki želijo izkoristiti ugodnosti pravnega varstva zase, za svoje prebivalstvo in okolje;
Considers that, despite its imperfections, the Euratom Treaty remains for the moment an indispensable legal framework, not only for Member States who wish to develop their nuclear industry but also for Member States who merely wish to benefit from a protective legal arsenal for themselves, their populations and their environment;
ponovno poziva, naj se skliče medvladna konferenca za celostno revizijo pogodbe Euratom, za odpravo zastarelih določb te pogodbe, za ohranitev regulativnega režima jedrske industrije na ravni EU, za spremembo preostalih določb ob upoštevanju sodobne in trajnostne energetske politike in za vključitev relevantnih določb v ločenem poglavju Pogodbe ES o energetiki;
Reiterates its call for an intergovernmental conference to be convened to carry out a comprehensive revision of the Euratom Treaty, to repeal the outdated provisions of that Treaty, to maintain the regulatory regime of the nuclear industry at EU level, to revise the remaining provisions in the light of a modern and sustainable energy policy and to incorporate the relevant ones in a separate energy chapter;
opozarja, da so določbe Pogodbe Euratom jedro razprave o industrijskih vprašanjih, povezanih z Lizbonsko strategijo, in energetskih vprašanj (zlasti z vidika oskrbe), v času, ko si Evropska unija prizadeva opredeliti evropsko mešanico energetskih virov, ki ima nizko vsebnost ogljika, je konkurenčna in v čim večji meri izvira z ozemlja Unije;
Points out that the provisions of the Euratom Treaty are at the heart of the debate on industrial issues, in connection with the Lisbon Strategy, and energy issues (particularly from the supply angle), at a time when the European Union is seeking to define a European energy mix that is low-carbon, competitive and as far as possible "home-grown";
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da jedrska energija Evropski uniji zdaj zagotavlja 32 % električne energije in da jo je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 10. januarja 2007 označila kot enega glavnih energetskih virov brez ogljikovega dioksida in kot tretji najcenejši vir v Evropi brez internalizacije stroškov ogljikovega dioksida; zato meni, da mora Evropska unija v skladu s Pogodbo Euratom zaščititi svojo vodilno vlogo na industrijskem in tehničnem področju, zlasti zaradi velike oživitve jedrskih dejavnosti pri drugih udeležencih (Rusija, ZDA) in vstopa novih udeležencev na svetovno jedrsko prizorišče (Kitajska in Indija), ki bodo srednjeročno tekmeci Evropske unije;
Reiterates, in this connection, that nuclear energy currently provides the European Union with 32% of its electricity, and that the Commission considered it in its Communication of 10 January 2007 to be one of the main CO2-free sources of energy in Europe, and the third-cheapest in Europe, without internalisation of CO2 costs; considers, therefore, that the European Union, in line with the Euratom Treaty, should defend its industrial and technical leadership in the light of the vigorous revival by other actors of their nuclear activities (Russia, USA) and the emergence of new world actors on the nuclear stage (China and India) which will be the European Union's competitors in the medium term;
meni, da bi se zaradi odsotnosti pravnega okvira, določenega v Pogodbi Euratom, ponovno nacionalizirala jedrska politika v Evropi, kar bi pomenilo nazadovanje pravnega reda Skupnosti ter povečalo nevarnost pravne negotovosti za vseh 27 držav članic;
Considers that the absence of the legal framework provided by the Euratom Treaty would lead to the renationalisation of nuclear policy in Europe, which would be a setback for the acquis communautaire, and would give rise to a risk of legal uncertainty for all the 27 Member States;
poziva, naj se spoštujejo načela poštene konkurence in enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za različne vire energije;
Calls for the principles of fair competition and a level playing field for different energy sources to be respected;
meni tudi, da bi črtanje enega ali več poglavij iz Pogodbe Euratom ali vključitev nekaterih določb v Pogodbo ES omajalo Pogodbo Euratom kot celoto, saj bi to oslabilo nadzor uporabe jedrske energije v Evropi; dodaja, da bi pomanjkanje skladnega pravnega okvira povzročilo, da bi bilo sprejemanje pravnega reda Pogodbe Euratom za prihodnje države članice veliko bolj zapleteno;
Considers also that deleting one or more chapters from the Euratom Treaty or merging certain provisions into the EC Treaty would unbalance the Euratom Treaty as a whole by weakening the supervision of nuclear energy use in Europe; adds that the absence of a coherent legal framework would make it far more complicated for future Member States to take on the Euratom acquis;
meni, da nadzor uporabe jedrske energije v Evropi glede na zelo specifične značilnosti tega energetskega vira zahteva ohranitev namenskega pravnega okvira, kot je Pogodba Euratom, kjer se že 50 let izkazuje uporabnost vseh njenih določb; dodaja, da bi njena delna vključitev v hipotetično poglavje o energiji v Pogodbi ES oslabila celoten pravni nadzor jedrske energije v Evropi in odpravila posebne postopke nadzora nad jedrsko energijo, ki jih zdaj vsebuje Pogodba Euratom;
Considers that supervision of nuclear energy use in Europe, in view of the very specific characteristics of this energy source, requires the maintenance of a dedicated legal framework such as the Euratom Treaty, which for 50 years has demonstrated the usefulness of all its provisions; adds that its partial incorporation into a hypothetical chapter on "Energy" in the EC Treaty would weaken the overall legal supervision of nuclear energy in Europe and remove the specific nuclear control procedures contained today in the Euratom Treaty;
vendar meni, da je treba Pogodbo Euratom nekoliko prenoviti;
Considers, nevertheless, that the Euratom Treaty needs to be somewhat reformed;
meni, da je ne glede na možnost kratkoročnih prilagoditev potrebna celovita revizija Pogodbe Euratom, da se nadomesti pomanjkanje demokratičnosti ter da so vprašanja skupne varnosti in zaščite v središču jedrskih dejavnosti Unije in njenih držav članic;
Considers that, irrespective of the possibility of making short-term adjustments, a comprehensive revision of the Euratom Treaty is necessary in order to make good the democratic deficit and to put common safety and security issues at the centre of the nuclear activities of the Union and its Member States;