natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vzpostavitvijo mreže EU za omogočanje izmenjave informacij o nezakonitem lesu za carinske službe ter upravne in pravosodne organe;
the establishment of an EU network to facilitate the exchange of information on illegal trading in timber, for customs, administrative and judicial authorities;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj spremenita pravno podlago za predlog Uredbe v zvezi s prostovoljno shemo izdajanja dovoljenj, ki podeljuje mandat za pogajanja o partnerskih sporazumih FLEGT, ter da namesto člena 133 uporabita člen 175 in/ali člen 179 Pogodbe ES;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to change the legal basis of the proposal for a regulation concerning the establishment of a voluntary FLEGT licensing scheme, which gives a mandate for the negotiation of FLEGT partnership agreements, from Article 133 to Article 175 and/or Article 179 of the EC Treaty;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo prostovoljni partnerski sporazumi vključevali partnerska načela, ki bodo države proizvajalke obvezovala k časovno omejenemu akcijskemu programu, katerega namen bo obravnava šibkih točk v upravljanju z gozdarskim sektorjem ter prispevanje k družbenemu in ekološko odgovornemu upravljanju gozdov, zaustavitvi zmanjševanja biotske raznolikosti, pospeševanju družbene enakosti in zmanjševanju revščine;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the voluntary partnership agreements incorporate partnership principles committing producer countries to a time-bound action programme and involving measures to tackle the weaknesses in forest-sector governance, contribute to socially and ecologically responsible forest management and an end to biodiversity loss, and promote social equity and poverty alleviation;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, da zagotovijo okrepitev, pa tudi učinkovito in ustrezno udeležbo civilne družbe in demokratično izvoljenih predstavnikov pri pogajanjih in izvajanju partnerskih sporazumov FLEGT, pa tudi pri postopku pregledovanja z gozdarstvom povezane zakonodaje v partnerskih državah, z namenom ugotavljanja šibkih točk ter družbenih in okoljskih krivic ter, kjer je to potrebno, oblikovanja predlogov sprememb;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure stronger, effective and meaningful participation of civil society and democratically elected representatives in the negotiation and implementation of FLEGT partnership agreements, as well as in the process of reviewing the partner country's forest-related laws to identify weaknesses and social and environmental injustices and, where necessary, the drafting of proposals for change;
vztraja, da morajo Komisija in države članice vključiti uveljavitev zakonodaje, upravljanje in trgovanje na področju gozdov v načrtovanje in izvajanje naslednje stopnje strateških dokumentov države, zlasti v regijah in državah z znatnimi gozdnimi viri, ter da morajo zagotoviti ustrezna sredstva iz geografskih proračunskih postavk za izgradnjo zmogljivosti in podporo pri izvajanju ključnih reform;
Insists that the Commission and the Member States integrate forest law enforcement, governance and trade into the planning and implementation of the next round of Country Strategy Papers, in particular in regions and countries with significant forest resources, and provide adequate funds from geographic budget lines in order to build capacity and support implementation of key reforms;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o obračunu in poravnavi v Evropski uniji ( 2004/2185(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on clearing and settlement in the European Union ( 2004/2185(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Obračun in poravnava v Evropski uniji – nadaljnji ukrepi" ( KOM(2004)0312 ),
having regard to the Commission's communication to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Clearing and Settlement in the European Union - The way forward" ( COM(2004)0312 ),
ob upoštevanju prvega in drugega poročila skupine Giovannini o čezmejnem dogovoru o obračunu in poravnavi v EU, ki sta bili izdani novembra 2001 in aprila 2003,
having regard to the first and second reports of the Giovannini Group on Cross Border Clearing and Settlement Arrangements in the EU, issued in November 2001 and April 2003 respectively,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. januarja 2003 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom "Obračun in poravnava v Evropski uniji, glavna politična vprašanja in izzivi v prihodnosti" UL C 38 E, 12.2.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2003 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament entitled "Clearing and settlement in the European Union: main policy issues and future challenges" OJ C 38 E, 12.2.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju ustanovitve skupine strokovnjakov za svetovanje in nadzor glede obračuna in poravnave (skupina "CESAME" – Clearing and Settlement Advisory and Monitoring Expert Group) s strani Komisije, ki je imela prvi sestanek 16. julija 2004,
having regard to the establishment of the Clearing and Settlement Advisory and Monitoring Expert Group ("the CESAME Group") by the Commission, which held its first meeting on 16 July 2004,
ob upoštevanju izjave štirih zaporednih predsedstev EU, in sicer Republike Irske, Nizozemske, Luksemburga in Združenega kraljestva, z dne 26. januarja 2004, v kateri so poudarili pomembnost lizbonskega procesa in potrebo po izboljšanju kakovosti pravne ureditve in premisleku o spremembah zakonodaje,
having regard to the declaration of 26 January 2004 by four successive Council presidencies, namely, the Republic of Ireland, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the United Kingdom, which stressed the importance of the Lisbon process and the need to improve the quality of regulation and to consider alternatives to legislation,
ob upoštevanju pripomb predsednika Evropske centralne banke med razpravo na plenarnem zasedanju 25. oktobra 2004,
having regard to the observations made by the President of the European Central Bank during the debate in plenary on 25 October 2004;
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0180/2005 ),
having regard to the report of its Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0180/2005 ),
ker se infrastruktura za obračun in poravnavo vrednostnih papirjev v EU sedaj še oblikuje ter čezmejno delovanje obračuna in poravnave še ni dovolj usklajeno in ker Komisija izvaja študijo o presoji vplivov, da bi ugotovila skupne primerjalne prednosti regulativnih in neregulativnih možnosti za zmanjšanje stroškov čezmejnih transakcij (vključno z odpravo ovir skupine Giovannini) ob upoštevanju interesa vseh udeležencev (izdajatelji, vlagatelji in finančni posredniki), ter ker lahko ta študija zakonodajo bodisi predlaga bodisi ne predlaga,
whereas the infrastructure for securities clearing and settlement in the EU is currently being shaped and cross-border clearing and settlement activity remains insufficiently harmonised, and whereas the Commission is carrying out an impact-assessment study in order to identify the net comparative benefits of regulatory and non-regulatory options to reduce the costs of cross-border transactions (including the elimination of the Giovannini barriers) taking into account the interest of all participants (issuers, investors and financial intermediaries), and whereas that study may or may not propose legislation,
ker je evropska industrija obračuna in poravnave uspešna, inovativna in se odziva na pritisk strank na domače transakcije; ker obstaja veliko prostora za povečano učinkovitost čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave transakcij vrednostnih papirjev, kjer je infrastruktura za poravnavo vrednostnih papirjev razdrobljena v veliko domačih sistemov; ker so nekateri uporabniki storitev obračuna in poravnave večja podjetja, ki so se za zaščito svojih interesov zmožna odločno pogajati s ponudniki storitev; ker je treba poudariti pomen doseganja globalnega sistema, ki zagotavlja varen in učinkovit okvir za transakcije za vse uporabnike (vlagatelje, izdajatelje, finančne posrednike) in s tem spodbuja konkurenco,
whereas the clearing and settlement industry is successful, innovative and responsive to customer pressure on domestic transactions, whereas there is significant scope for increased efficiency in cross-border clearing and settlement of securities transactions, where the infrastructure for securities settlement is fragmented in a multiplicity of domestic systems; whereas some users of clearing and settlement services tend, however, to be large firms, which are able to negotiate firmly with service providers to defend their interests; whereas the importance should be stressed of achieving a global system which provides a safe and efficient framework for transactions to all users (investors, issuers, financial intermediaries) thereby promoting competition,
ker na trgu storitev obračuna in poravnave v EU obstaja konkurenca, vendar se stopnja konkurence spreminja glede na posamezno storitev, ki se opravlja, in je število večjih ponudnikov storitev sorazmerno majhno (npr. številni večji skrbniki izvajajo storitve obračuna in poravnave sami tako, da prenesejo varnostne papirje med strankami znotraj analitične evidence računov); ker mora Komisija ustrezno razlikovati med funkcijami po trgovanju, ki jih v medsebojni konkurenci zagotavljajo sledeče institucije:
whereas there is competition in the market for clearing and settlement services in the EU, but the degree of competition varies according to the specific service provided and there is a relatively small number of major services providers (for example, a number of larger custodians perform clearing and settlement type services "in-house" by transferring securities between customers on their own books); whereas the Commission should properly distinguish between the post-trade functions provided in competition by the following institutions:
mednarodni centralni registri vrednostnih papirjev (MCVRP-ji), ki opravljajo dve dejavnosti: (1) delujejo kot CRVP-ji pri poravnavi transakcij Eurobonda in (2) opravljajo dejavnosti globalnega skrbnika pri vrednostnih papirjih, pri katerih ne delujejo kot depozitarji; kot del teh dejavnosti globalnega skrbnika ICSD-ji nudijo program posojanja in druge tristranske storitve, in
international central securities depositories (ICSDs), which perform two activities: (1) acting as CSDs for the settlement side of Eurobond transactions and (2) performing global custodian activities on securities for which they are not acting as depositories; as part of these global custodian activities, ICSDs provide lending programme and other tri-party services;
osrednje nasprotne stranke (central counterparts - CCP-ji), ki opravljajo dejavnosti osrednjega zagotavljanja in v večini primerov dejavnosti poračunavanja neto saldov (oboje je v sporočilu Komisije opredeljeno kot obračun); ker je ključna naloga CCP-jev nadomestiti vsako nasprotno stranko trgovine s posredovanjem pri transakcijah, združujejo nadomestna tveganja skupaj s svojimi člani obračunskega sistema,
central counterparts (CCPs), which perform central guarantee and, in most cases, netting activities (both defined as clearing in the abovementioned Commission communication); since the essential mission of CCPs consists of replacing each counterparty to the trade by interposing themselves in the transactions, they concentrate replacement risks together with their clearing members; and
depozitne banke, ki ponujajo storitve obračuna in poravnave in ki lahko sodelujejo pri storitvah CCP-jev kot članice obračunskega sistema,
custodian banks, which offer clearing and settlement services and which can participate in CCP services as clearing members;
ker neučinkovitosti na trgu za čezmejni obračun in poravnavo v EU, ki delno izhajajo iz dveh virov: večjih operativnih stroškov na transakcijo zaradi nacionalnih razlik pravne narave, tehničnih zahtev, praks na trgih in davčnih postopkov ter v nekaterih primerih višjih marž zaradi omejevalnih praks na trgih,
whereas inefficiencies exist in the market for cross-border clearing and settlement in the EU which arise partly from two sources: higher operating costs per transaction due to national differences of a legal nature, technical requirements, market practices and tax procedures, and in some cases higher margins due to restrictive market practices,
ker sta zgoraj omenjeni poročili skupine Giovannini opredelili 15 ovir zaradi omenjenih nacionalnih razlik in si skupina CESAME prizadeva za uskladitev pobud zasebnega in javnega sektorja za odstranitev teh ovir ter ker se lahko nekatere pravne in z dostopom povezane ovire odpravijo le z zakonodajo,
whereas the abovementioned Giovannini reports identified 15 barriers which result from those national differences, and the CESAME Group is working to coordinate private and public sector initiatives to remove them, and whereas some of the legal and access-related barriers can only be removed through legislation,
ker sedanja koncentracija borz ter težnja osrednjih funkcij obračuna in poravnave k razvoju v monopole kažeta na potrebo po večji preglednosti na trgu za čezmejni obračun in poravnavo,
whereas the current concentration of stock exchanges and the tendency for central clearing and settlement functions to develop into monopolies demonstrate a need for increased transparency in the cross-border clearing and settlement market,
izrecno podpira cilj, določen v sporočilu Komisije, o učinkovitem, povezanem in varnem trgu za obračun in poravnavo vrednostnih papirjev v EU;
Warmly supports the goal set out in the abovementioned Commission communication of an efficient, integrated and safe market for clearing and settlement of securities in the EU;
verjame, da bo oblikovanje učinkovitih sistemov EU za obračun in poravnavo zapleten proces, in ugotavlja, da bo resnično evropsko vključevanje in usklajevanje zahtevalo skupno prizadevanje različnih interesnih skupin ter da mora sedanja javna politična razprava ustrezno upoštevati načela, ki podpirajo Direktivo 2004/39/ES UL L 145, 30.4.2004, str.
Believes that the creation of efficient EU clearing and settlement systems will be a complex process, and notes that true European integration and harmonisation will require the combined efforts of different stakeholders and that the current public policy debate should take due account of the principles underpinning Directive 2004/39/EC OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p.
in se osredotočiti na:
and focus on:
zmanjšanje stroškov čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave;
bringing down the cost of cross-border clearing and settlement;
zagotavljanje, da bo vsako sistemsko tveganje pri čezmejnem obračunu in poravnavi ustrezno vodeno in urejeno;
ensuring that systemic or any other remaining risks in cross-border clearing and settlement are properly managed and regulated;
spodbujanje vključevanja obračuna in poravnave z odpravo izkrivljanja konkurence; in
encouraging the integration of clearing and settlement by removing distortions of competition; and
zagotoviti ustrezne ureditve za preglednost in vodenje;
ensuring proper transparency and governance arrangements;
meni, da mora zakonodaja EU načeloma biti predmet analize stroškov in koristi ter da se mora EU zateči k zakonodaji, kjer obstaja očitno tveganje tržne nepopolnosti in kjer zakonodaja predstavlja učinkovit in skladen način za razrešitev jasno opredeljenih težav;
Believes that, as a general principle, legislation by the EU should be subject to a cost-benefit analysis and that the EU should resort to legislation where there is clear risk of market failure and where legislation is an effective and proportionate way to remedy clearly identified problems;
odločno trdi, da nobena nova uredba na tem področju ne sme podvajati obstoječe uredbe za posebne subjekte; ugotavlja, da je to zlasti pomembno za izogibanje dvojni ureditvi sektorja bančnih in investicijskih storitev; daje prednost funkcionalnemu pristopu k ureditvi, ki upošteva različne profile tveganj in konkurenčne položaje različnih subjektov ter vlogo CRVP-jev, ki jo priznava večina držav članic;
Strongly asserts that any new regulation in this area should not duplicate existing regulation for specific entities; notes that this is particularly important in order to avoid double regulation of the banking and investment services sector; prefers a functional approach to regulation which takes into account different risk profiles and competitive situations of different entities as well as the role of CSDs as recognised by most Member States;
je prepričan, da se nepotrebnim urejevalnim bremenom lahko najbolje izogne s pozorno obravnavo analize, katere cilj je opredeliti tiste zadeve, pri katerih bi lahko bila potrebna pravila;
Is convinced that an unnecessary regulatory burden can best be avoided by giving careful consideration to an analysis aimed at identifying those issues where rules may be needed;
ne vidi dokaza, da so ponudniki storitev obračuna in poravnave na nacionalni ravni slabo urejeni, čeprav so po EU urejeni na različne načine, oziroma da je katero koli sistemsko tveganje, ki ga sprožijo, neprimerno nadzorovano; ugotavlja, da so vzpostavljeni ukrepi za nadzorovanje operativnega tveganja (okvara sistemov), ki na področju obračuna in poravnave predstavlja glavni vir sistemskega tveganja; vendar pa opozarja na potrebo po zaščiti pred kakršnim koli sistemskim tveganjem, operativnim, likvidnostnim ali kreditnim; ugotavlja, da bo naravna težnja centralnih funkcij obračuna in poravnave h koncentraciji zaradi obstoja omrežnih zunanjih dejavnikov, ekonomij obsega in drugih dejavnikov neizogibno povzročila koncentracijo tveganj, ki so danes razpršena med številnimi sistemi poravnave;
Sees no evidence that the providers of clearing and settlement services are poorly regulated at national level, although they are regulated differently across the EU, or that any systemic risk they pose is inadequately controlled; notes the arrangements in place to manage operational risk (systems breakdown), which is the source of systemic risk most relevant to clearing and settlement; draws attention however to the need to guard against any systemic risk whether it be operational, liquidity-related or credit-related; notes that the natural tendency of central clearing and settlement functions to concentrate due to the existence of network externalities, economies of scale and other factors will inevitably concentrate risks, which are today dispersed among many settlement systems;
pozdravlja odločbo Komisije, da bo izvedla presojo vplivov, ki mora vključevati natančno analizo morebitnih stroškov in koristi tako zakonodajnih kot nezakonodajnih možnosti ter njihov obseg;
Welcomes the Commission decision to conduct an impact assessment, which should include a thorough analysis of the potential costs and benefits of both legislative and non-legislative options, and their respective scope;
o dokončnosti poravnave pri plačilih in sistemih poravnave vrednostnih papirjev ter Direktiva 2004/39/ES) pravilno izvaja in ostro uveljavlja;
on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and Directive 2004/39/EC) is properly and consistently implemented and rigorously enforced;
je zaskrbljen zaradi zamud na stopnji 2 izvajanja Direktive 2004/39/ES in poudarja, da mora vsaka preložitev datuma uporabe upoštevati pristojnosti Evropskega parlamenta;
Is concerned at the delays in Level 2 of implementation of Directive 2004/39/EC and points out that any postponement of the date of implementation should not disregard the competences of the European Parliament;
obžaluje, da Komisija ni obravnavala storitev po trgovanju istočasno kot investicijske storitve; je zaskrbljen zaradi pravne praznine, ki je zato nastala, zlasti v zvezi z usklajevanjem postopkov, izdajanjem potnih listov in nadzorom, kot posledica načel prostega dostopa, ki jih določa Direktiva 2004/39/ES;
Regrets that the Commission did not deal with post-trade services at the same time as investment services; is concerned at the legal vacuum thus created, particularly in terms of the harmonisation of procedures, issuing passports and supervision, as a result of the principles of free access established by Directive 2004/39/EC;
meni, da se mora predlog Komisije, če bi se odločila za zakonodajo na podlagi rezultatov študij o presoji vplivov, osredotočiti predvsem na:
Believes that if the Commission, on the basis of the results of the impact assessment study, does opt for legislation, its proposal should particularly focus on:
ponovno potrditev in krepitev pravic dostopa, da se zagotovi pravičen in nediskriminatoren dostop do ponudnikov storitev obračuna in poravnave;
re-confirming and strengthening access rights in order to ensure fair and non-discriminatory access to central clearing and settlement service providers;
krepitev pravic do poslovanja v drugi državi za ponudnike storitev obračuna in poravnave, ob podpori, ko je to potrebno, približevanja gospodarskih predpisov;
strengthening passporting rights for providers of clearing and settlement services supported, when needed, by regulatory convergence;
omogočanje preglednosti in omogočanje učinkovitega delovanja tržnih sil;
allowing for transparency and enabling market forces to work effectively;
doseganje doslednosti ureditve, preglednosti in upravljanja, ki bi ponudnikom storitev obračuna in poravnave omogočila nadzor sistemskega tveganja in protikonkurenčnega obnašanja;
achieving consistency of regulation, supervision and transparency to enable providers of clearing and settlement services to manage systemic risk and anti-competitive behaviour;
vzpostavitev funkcionalnega pristopa različnih akterjev k ureditvi, ki upošteva različne profile tveganj in konkurenčne položaje različnih subjektov;
establishing a functional approach to the regulation of different players, which takes into account the different risk profiles and competitive situations of different entities;
vpeljavo opredelitev, ki so v skladu z obstoječimi tržnimi praksami in terminologijo, ki se uporablja globalno in v okviru EU;
introducing definitions that are coherent and consistent with existing market practices and with the terms used globally and within the EU;
se strinja s Komisijo, da mora v prvi vrsti trg odločiti strukturo storitev obračuna in poravnave; meni, da noben posamezen model ne sme biti obvezen, npr. v lasti in pod vodstvom uporabnika, v lasti delničarja ali v javni lasti itd.;
Agrees with the Commission that it is principally the market that should decide the structure of clearing and settlement services; considers that no particular model should be mandatory, e.g. user owned and governed, shareholder owned, publicly owned;
Ovire skupine Giovannini
The Giovannini Barriers
meni, da je zmanjšanje stroškov čezmejnega obračuna in poravnave nujno predvsem za odstranitev 15 "ovir skupine Giovannini", po možnosti prek tržnih mehanizmov; zahteva, da vsi javni organi in zasebni udeleženci podvojijo svoja prizadevanja za njihovo odstranitev; podpira prizadevanja Komisije za usklajevanje tega projekta prek skupine CESAME;
Believes that bringing down the cost of cross-border clearing and settlement necessitates in particular the removal of the 15 " Giovannini barriers", through market mechanisms when possible; urges all entities, both public and private, to re-double their efforts to remove them; supports the Commission's efforts to coordinate this project via the CESAME Group;
meni, da odstranitev "ovir skupine Giovannini" ostaja prednostna naloga; meni, da bi moral biti, če je potrebno, prvi cilj uredbe odstranitev tistih pravnih in fiskalnih ovir, ki se jih ne da odstraniti brez posredovanja javnosti;
Considers that the removal of the Giovannini barriers remains a priority; believes that regulation should, if necessary, have as its primary goal the removal of those legal and fiscal barriers that cannot be removed without public intervention;