natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Dovoljenje mora ponudniku običajno omogočati dostop do storitvene dejavnosti ali opravljanje te dejavnosti na celotnem državnem ozemlju, razen če je ozemeljsko omejevanje upravičeno s pomembnim razlogom, ki je povezan z javnim interesom.
The authorisation should normally enable the provider to have access to the service activity, or to exercise that activity, throughout the national territory, except if a territorial limit is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Določbe te direktive v zvezi s sistemi dovoljenj zadevajo primere, v katerih je dostop do storitvenih dejavnosti ali njihovo opravljanje s strani gospodarskih subjektov odvisno od odločitve pristojnega organa.
The provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes should concern cases where the access to or exercise of a service activity by economic operators requires a decision by a competent authority.
Ta direktiva ne posega v možnost držav članic, da prekličejo izdana dovoljenja, zlasti če niso več izpolnjeni pogoji za izdajo dovoljenja.
This Directive is without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to withdraw authorisations after they have been issued, particularly if the conditions for the granting of the authorisation are no longer fulfilled.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča so javno zdravje, varstvo potrošnikov, zdravje živali in cilji urbanega okolja pomemben razlog za javni interes, ki lahko upraviči uporabo sistemov dovoljenj in drugih omejitev, ki se uporabljajo za socialne storitve.
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, public health, consumer protection, animal health and urban environment objectives constitute overriding reasons relating to the public interest which can justify the application of authorisation schemes and other restrictions applicable to social services.
Hkrati je treba vedno spoštovati načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
Further, the principles of necessity and proportionality must always be respected.
V primerih, ko je število razpoložljivih dovoljenj za dejavnost omejeno zaradi omejenosti naravnih virov ali tehničnih
In cases where the number of authorisations available for an activity is limited because of scarcity of natural resources or technical
treba sprejeti postopek izbora med več potencialnimi kandidati s ciljem, da se z javnim natečajem razvijejo kakovost in pogoji za opravljanje storitev, ki so na voljo uporabnikom.
procedure for selection from among several potential candidates must be adopted, with the aim of developing through open competition the quality and conditions for supply of services available to users.
Takšen postopek mora zagotavljati transparentnost in nepristranskost, tako izdano dovoljenje pa ne sme veljati predolgo ali biti samodejno podaljšano ali dodeljevati uspešnemu ponudniku kakršne koli ugodnosti.
Such a procedure must provide guarantees of transparency and impartiality and the authorisation thus granted must not have an excessive duration, or be subject to automatic renewal, or confer any advantage on the successful provider.
Ta določba ne preprečuje državam članicam, da omejijo število dovoljenj
This provision does not prevent Member States from limiting the number of authorisations
Takšna dovoljenja
Such authorisations
so vsekakor predmet drugih določb te direktive, ki se nanašajo na sisteme
remain in any case subject to the other provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation
Omejitve, ki jih je treba prepovedati in ki še posebej prizadevajo notranji trg storitev, se morajo sistematično odpraviti v najkrajšem možnem času.
The restrictions to be prohibited particularly affect the internal market for services and should be systematically dismantled as soon as possible.
Na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča svoboda ustanavljanja temelji še posebej na načelu enake obravnave, ki ne prepoveduje le diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, ampak tudi posredno diskriminacijo na drugih podlagah, ki ima lahko enake posledice.
The Court of Justice has consistently held that the freedom of establishment is predicated, in particular, upon the principle of equal treatment, which entails the prohibition not only of any discrimination on grounds of nationality but also of any indirect discrimination based on other grounds but capable of producing the same result.
Tako za dostop do storitvenih dejavnosti ali za njihovo izvajanje v državi članici, kot glavne ali kot sekundarne dejavnosti, ne veljajo merila, kot so sedež, prebivališče, stalno bivališče ali glavno opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti.
Thus, access to a service activity or the exercise thereof in a Member State, either as a principal or secondary activity, may not be made subject to criteria such as place of establishment, residence, domicile or principal provision of the service activity.
Podobno tudi država članica ne more omejevati pravne in poslovne sposobnosti ali pravice biti stranka v sodnem postopku družbam, ustanovljenim v skladu s predpisi druge države članice, na ozemlju katere imajo glavni sedež.
Similarly, a Member State may not restrict the legal capacity or the right to bring legal proceedings of companies incorporated in accordance with the law of another Member State on whose territory they have their primary establishment.
Razen tega država članica ne more dajati nobene prednosti ponudnikom, ki imajo posebno nacionalno ali lokalno socialno-ekonomsko povezavo; niti ne more na podlagi sedeža omejevati svobode ponudnika, da pridobiva, izkorišča ali razpolaga s pravicami in blagom ali da dostopa do različnih vrst posojil ali namestitve, če te možnosti služijo dostopu do njegove dejavnosti ali njenemu učinkovitemu izvajanju.
Moreover, a Member State may not confer any advantages on providers having a particular national or local socio-economic link; nor may it restrict, on grounds of place of establishment, the provider's freedom to acquire, exploit or dispose of rights and goods or to access different forms of credit or accommodation in so far as those choices are useful for access to his activity or for the effective exercise thereof.
Prepoved ekonomskega preizkusa kot predpogoja za izdajo dovoljenja zajema sam ekonomski preizkus, ne pa zahtev, ki
The prohibition of economic tests as a prerequisite for the grant of authorisation covers economic tests as such, but not requirements which
so utemeljene
are justified
s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, kot je varovanje mestnega okolja
by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, such as protection of the urban environment
, socialne politike in ciljev javnega zdravja
, social policy and public health objectives
Za usklajevanje posodabljanja nacionalnih predpisov na način, ki bo skladen z zahtevami notranjega trga, je treba oceniti določene nediskriminacijske nacionalne zahteve, ki bi lahko po svoji naravi resno omejile ali celo preprečile dostop do dejavnosti ali njeno izvajanje iz svobode ustanavljanja.
In order to coordinate the modernisation of national rules and regulations in a manner consistent with the requirements of the internal market, it is necessary to evaluate certain non-discriminatory national requirements which, by their very nature, could severely restrict or even prevent access to an activity or the exercise thereof under the freedom of establishment.
Države članice morajo v obdobju prenosa te direktive zagotavljati potrebnost in sorazmernost teh zahtev ter jih po potrebi odpraviti ali spremeniti.
Member States must ensure, during the transposition period of this Directive, that such requirements are necessary and proportionate and, where appropriate, they must abolish or amend them.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, predviden v tej direktivi, ne vpliva na svobodo držav članic, da v zakonodaji določijo višjo raven varovanja javnih interesov, še zlasti za doseganje ciljev zdravstvene in socialne politike.
The mutual evaluation process provided for in this Directive does not affect the freedom of Member States to fix in their legislation a high level of protection of public interests, in particular for achieving health and social policy objectives.
Sodišče je na primer glede obveznosti za prevzem določene pravne oblike za izvedbo nekaterih storitev na socialnem področju že priznalo, da obstaja utemeljitev za to, da se od ponudnika storitev zahteva, da deluje neprofitno.
For example, concerning the obligation to take a specific legal form in order to exercise certain services in the social field, the Court of Justice has already recognised that it can be justified to submit the service provider to a requirement to be non-profit making.
Omejitve, ki jih je treba preučiti, vključujejo nacionalne predpise, ki zaradi razlogov, ki se ne nanašajo na poklicne kvalifikacije, posameznim ponudnikom zadržujejo dostop do
The restrictions to be examined include national rules which, on grounds other than those relating to professional qualifications, reserve access to
da direktiva opredeljuje številne zahteve, ki jih bodo v obdobju prenosa države članice odpravile ali ovrednotile, ne posega v postopke proti državam članicam, v katerih se ugotavlja neizpolnjevanje obveznosti iz členov 43 ali 49 Pogodbe.
fact that this Directive specifies a number of requirements to be abolished or evaluated by the Member States during the transposition period is without prejudice to any infringement proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil its obligations under Articles 43 or 49 of the Treaty.
Za zagotavljanje učinkovitega izvajanja prostega pretoka storitev in za zagotavljanje, da lahko prejemniki in ponudniki uporabljajo in opravljajo storitve v vsej Skupnosti ne glede na meje, je treba
In order to secure effective implementation of the free movement of services and to ensure that recipients and providers can benefit from and supply services throughout the Community regardless of frontiers, it is necessary
jasno določiti, v kakšnem obsegu za ponudnike storitev velja zakonodaja države članice, kjer imajo sedež, in v kakšnem obsegu se uporablja zakonodaja države članice, kjer se opravlja storitev.
to clarify to what extent service providers are subject to the legislation of the Member State where they are established and to what extent legislation of the Member State where the service is provided is applicable.
je zagotoviti, da se od pravila o uporabi zakonodaje izvorne države lahko odstopa samo na področjih, za katera veljajo splošna ali prehodna odstopanja.
is necessary to provide that the rule that the law of the country of origin is to apply may be departed from only in the areas covered by derogations, general or transitional.
Za zagotovitev pravne varnosti, ki je bistvena za spodbujanje malih in srednje velikih podjetij k opravljanju storitev v drugih državah članicah, je treba ta odstopanja omejiti le na nujno potrebna.
In order to ensure the legal certainty which is essential in order to encourage SMEs to provide their services in other Member States, those derogations should be limited to what is strictly necessary.
Zlasti bi odstopanje moralo biti možno le zaradi razlogov, povezanih z varnostjo storitev, opravljanjem zdravstvenega poklica ali zadevami javnega reda, kot je varstvo mladoletnikov, ter le toliko, kolikor nacionalni prepisi na tem področju niso bili usklajeni.
In particular, derogation should be possible only for reasons related to the safety of services, exercise of a health profession or matters of public policy, such as the protection of minors, and to the extent that national provisions in this field have not been harmonised.
Poleg tega bi kakršno koli omejevanje svobode opravljanja storitev moralo biti dovoljeno izjemoma in le če je v skladu s temeljnimi pravicami, ki na podlagi sodne prakse Sodišča tvorijo sestavni del splošnih načel zakonodaje, vsebovanih v pravnem redu Skupnosti.
In addition, any restriction of the freedom to provide services should be permitted, by way of exception, only if it is consistent with fundamental rights which, as the Court of Justice has consistently held, form an integral part of the general principles of law enshrined in the Community legal order.
Svoboda opravljanja storitev v skladu s to direktivo se ne uporablja za določbe v državah članicah, v katerih se opravlja storitev in ki dejavnost omejijo na določen poklic, kot je na primer zahteva, da je pravno svetovanje omejeno na pravnike.
The freedom to provide services as provided for in this Directive should not apply to provisions in the Member States where the service is provided which reserve an activity to a particular profession, for example requirements which reserve legal advice to lawyers.
V primerih, ko se ponudnik začasno preseli v državo članico, ki ni izvorna država članica, je treba omogočiti medsebojno pomoč med tema dvema državama, tako da država članica, v katero se ponudnik začasno preseli, lahko izvaja kontrole, preglede in poizvedbe na zahtevo izvorne države članice ali izvaja take kontrole na lastno pobudo, če kontrolira le dejansko stanje.
In cases where a provider moves temporarily to a Member State other than the Member State of origin, it is necessary to provide for mutual assistance between those two States so that the former can carry out checks, inspections and enquiries at the request of the Member State of origin or carry out such checks on its own initiative if these are merely factual checks.
Poleg tega bi v primeru delavcev, napotenih na delo, moralo biti državi
Moreover, it should be possible in the case of posted workers for the
omogočeno, da ukrepa proti ponudniku s sedežem v drugi državi članici za zagotovitev izpolnjevanja zaposlitvenih in delovnih pogojev, ki veljajo po Direktivi 96/71/ES.
to take action against a provider established in another Member State in order to ensure compliance with the employment and working conditions applicable under Directive 96/71/EC.
Ta direktiva ne sme posegati v pogoje zaposlovanja, ki v skladu z Direktivo 96/71/ES veljajo za delavce, napotene za opravljanje storitve na ozemlju druge države članice.
This Directive should not affect terms and conditions of employment which, pursuant to Directive 96/71/EC, apply to workers posted to provide a service in the territory of another Member State.
To so: najdaljša doba dela in najkrajša doba počitka, minimalni plačani dopust, najmanjša plača, vključno s plačilom nadur, pogoji v zvezi z najemanjem delavcev, zlasti v zvezi z oskrbo z delavci s strani podjetij za začasno zaposlovanje, zdravstveni, varnostni in higienski standardi, zaščitni ukrepi glede pogojev za zaposlovanje nosečnic ali žensk, ki so pred kratkim rodile, otrok in mladih, enakovredna obravnava moških in žensk ter druge določbe o nediskriminaciji.
These are: maximum work periods and minimum rest periods, minimum paid annual holidays, minimum rates of pay, including overtime rates, the conditions of hiring out of workers, in particular the supply of workers by temporary employment undertakings, health, safety and hygiene at work, protective measures with regard to the terms and conditions of employment of pregnant women or women who have recently given birth and of children and young people and equality of treatment between men and women and other provisions on non-discrimination.
Razen tega ta direktiva državam članicam ne sme preprečevati uporabe pogojev zaposlovanja v zadevah, ki niso navedene v Direktivi 96/71/ES, na podlagi določil javnega reda.
Moreover, this Directive should not prevent Member States from applying terms and conditions of employment on matters other than those listed in Directive 96/71/EC on the grounds of public policy provisions.
Ta direktiva tudi ne sme vplivati na pogoje zaposlovanja v primerih, ko se delavca, zaposlenega za opravljanje čezmejne storitve, zaposli v državi članici, kjer se opravlja storitev.
This Directive should neither affect terms and conditions of employment in cases where the worker employed for the provision of a cross-border service is recruited in the Member State where the service is provided.
Končno mora ta direktiva vključevati pravico države članice, v kateri se opravlja storitev, da določi obstoj delovnega razmerja ter razlikovanje med samozaposlenimi osebami in zaposlenimi osebami, vključno z "lažnimi samozaposlenimi osebami".
Finally, this Directive should include the right for the Member States where the service is provided to determine the existence of an employment relationship and the distinction between self-employed persons and employed persons, including "false self-employed persons'.
Primerno je predvideti odstopanje od
It is appropriate to provide for derogation from the
svobode opravljanja storitev v skladu s to direktivo
freedom to provide services as provided for in this Directive
v primeru storitev, za katere velja splošna prepoved v državi članici, v katero se je ponudnik preselil, če je takšna prepoved
in the case of services covered by a general prohibition in the Member State to which a provider has moved, if that prohibition
z razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni red, javno varnost ali javno zdravje.
by reasons relating to public policy, public security or public health.
Odstopanje bi moralo biti omejeno na splošne prepovedi in ne bi smelo na primer veljati za nacionalne programe, ki ne prepovedujejo dejavnosti na splošno, ampak omejujejo izvajanje te dejavnosti na enega ali več posebnih subjektov ali prepovedujejo izvajanje dejavnosti brez predhodnega dovoljenja.
That derogation should be limited to general prohibitions and should not, for example, cover national schemes which, while not prohibiting an activity in a general manner, reserve the exercise of that activity to one or several specific operators, or which prohibit the exercise of an activity without prior authorisation.
Dejstvo, da država članica dovoljuje dejavnost, vendar jo omeji na določene subjekte, pomeni, da za dejavnost ne velja splošna prepoved in se ne šteje, da je po naravi v nasprotju z javnim redom, javno varnostjo ali javnim zdravjem.
The fact that a Member State permits an activity, but reserves it to certain operators, means that the activity is not subject to a general prohibition and is not regarded as inherently contrary to public policy, public security or public health.
Zato izključitev takšne dejavnosti s področja uporabe direktive ne bi bila utemeljena.
Consequently, the exclusion of such an activity from the scope of the Directive would not be justified.
ne bi smela veljati za posebne pogoje, ki jih je določila država članica, v katero se je preselil ponudnik, kadar je utemeljitev teh pogojev neizogibno povezana s posebnostmi kraja, kjer se opravlja storitev, izpolnjevanje pogojev pa je potrebno za ohranjanje javnega reda, javne varnosti, javnega zdravja ali varstva okolja.
should not apply to specific requirements, laid down by the Member State to which a provider has moved, the rationale for which is inextricably linked to the particular characteristics of the place where the service is provided, and which must be fulfilled in order to maintain public policy, public safety, public health or the protection of the environment.
Takšni posebni pogoji bi veljali na primer za dovoljenja za zavzemanje ali uporabo javne avtoceste, zahteve v zvezi z organizacijo javnih dogodkov ali zahteve v zvezi z varnostjo na gradbiščih.
Such would be the position, for example, in the case of authorisations to occupy or use the public highway, requirements relating to the organisation of public events or requirements relating to the safety of building sites.
Izključitev iz
The exclusion from the
za zadeve, ki se nanašajo na registracijo vozil, zakupljenih v državi članici, ki ni država članica, v kateri se uporabljajo, izhaja iz sodne prakse Sodišča, ki dopušča, da lahko država članica v skladu s sorazmernimi pogoji predpiše takšno obveznost za vozila, ki se uporabljajo na njenem ozemlju.
of matters relating to the registration of vehicles leased in a Member State other than that in which they are used follows from the case-law of the Court of Justice, which has accepted that a Member State may impose such an obligation, in accordance with proportionate conditions, in the case of vehicles used on its territory.
Pogodbeni odnosi med ponudnikom storitev in prejemnikom kot tudi med delodajalcem in delavcem niso predmet te direktive.
Contractual relations between the service provider and the recipient as well as between employer and employee should not be subject to this Directive.
Določanje veljavnega prava za pogodbene in nepogodbene obveznosti urejajo instrumenti Skupnosti za zasebno mednarodno pravo.
The determination of the applicable contractual and non-contractual law shall be regulated by Community instruments on international private law.
članicam je treba izjemoma in za vsak posamezen primer omogočiti, da sprejmejo ukrepe, ki odstopajo od
is necessary to allow Member States the possibility, exceptionally and on a case-by-case basis, of taking measures which derogate from the
svobode opravljanja storitev v skladu s to direktivo,
freedom to provide services as provided for in this Directive
glede ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici zaradi določenih razlogov, kot je varnost storitev.
in respect of a provider established in another Member State, for certain reasons such as the safety of services.
Takšne ukrepe je mogoče sprejeti le, če ni usklajevanja na ravni Skupnosti.
It should be possible to take such measures only in the absence of harmonisation at Community level.
Poleg tega ta možnost ne bi smela dovoljevati omejevalnih ukrepov na področjih, za katera druge direktive, kot Direktiva 1999/93/ES ali Direktiva 98/84/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. novembra 1998 o pravnem varstvu storitev, ki temeljijo na pogojnem dostopu ali ga vključujejo UL L 320, 28.11.1998, str.
Moreover, that possibility should not permit restrictive measures to be taken in areas in which other Directives prohibit all derogation from the free movement of services, such as Directive 1999/93/EC or Directive 98/84/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 20 November 1998 on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access OJ L 320, 28.11.1998, p.
Ta možnost tudi ne bi smela dovoljevati širitev ali omejevanje odstopanj, ki jih predvidevajo druge direktive, kot
Nor should that possibility permit the extension or limitation of derogations provided for in other Directives, such
sta direktivi 89/552/EGS in
as Directives 89/552/EEC or 2000/31/EC
Omejitve prostega pretoka storitev v nasprotju z direktivo ne nastanejo le zaradi ukrepov, ki veljajo za ponudnike, ampak tudi zaradi številnih ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo pri uporabi storitev prejemniki, še posebej potrošniki.
Restrictions on the free movement of services, contrary to this Directive, may arise not only from measures applied to providers, but also from the many barriers to the use of services by recipients, especially consumers.
Direktiva nazorno navaja določene vrste omejitev, veljavnih za prejemnike, ki želijo uporabljati storitev ponudnika s sedežem v drugi državi članici.
This Directive mentions, by way of illustration, certain types of restriction applied to a recipient wishing to use a service performed by a provider established in another Member State.
V skladu z določbami Pogodbe o prostem pretoku storitev, kot jih tolmači Sodišče, je prepovedana diskriminacija na podlagi državljanstva prejemnika ali njegovega nacionalnega ali lokalnega bivališča.
In accordance with the Treaty rules on the free movement of services, as interpreted by the Court of Justice, discrimination on grounds of the recipient's nationality or national or local residence is prohibited.
Taka diskriminacija je lahko na primer obveznost, naložena samo državljanom drugih držav članic, da predložijo izvirne dokumente, overjene kopije, potrdila o državljanstvu ali uradne prevode dokumentov, da bi lahko koristili storitev, oziroma ugodnejše pogoje ali cene.
Such discrimination could take the form of an obligation, imposed only on nationals of another Member State, to supply original documents, certified copies, a certificate of nationality or official translations of documents in order to benefit from a service or from more advantageous terms or prices.