natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju ocene Komisije o lizbonski strategiji (SEK (2010)114),
– having regard to the Commission’s evaluation of the Lisbon Strategy (SEC (2010) 114),
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to the Article 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
A. ker je svetovna finančna, gospodarska in socialna kriza dramatično razkrila krhkost neustrezno reguliranih trgov ter ogrozila solidarnost in socialno pravičnost v naši družbi in med državami članicami,
A. whereas the global financial, economic and social crisis has dramatically exposed the fragility of inadequately regulated markets and has put at risk solidarity and social justice within our societies and among the Member States,
B. ker se države članice soočajo s stalno naraščajočo brezposelnostjo, ko je brez dela več kot 23 milijonov žensk in moških, kar povzroča velike socialne in človeške težave,
B. whereas Member States are facing steadily rising unemployment, with more than 23 million women and men out of work, which generates immense social and human difficulties,
C. ker so zaradi podnebnih sprememb postavljeni pod vprašaj današnji vzorci potratne in netrajnostne proizvodnje, porazdelitve in potrošnje, zaradi česar je potreben nov trajnostni model razvoja,
C. whereas climate change calls into question today’s wasteful and unsustainable production, distribution and consumption patterns, which need to be addressed through a new sustainable model of development,
D. ker je bil cilj lizbonske strategije zelo konkurenčno, na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo, sposobno trajnostne rasti z več in boljšimi delovnimi mesti ter boljšo socialno kohezijo in spoštovanjem okolja,
D. whereas the Lisbon Strategy set the goal of achieving a highly competitive knowledge-driven economy capable of sustainable growth, more and better jobs, greater social cohesion and respect for the environment,
E. ker je lizbonska strategija žrtev prevelikih ambicij in premalo jasnega osrednjega cilja, saj je z združitvijo več ločenih ciljev v enega, zelo kompleksnega, izgubila poudarek in preglednost,
E. whereas the Lisbon Strategy suffered from both the over-ambition and the lack of clarity of its central goal because it rolled many separate targets into a single highly complex objective, loosing both focus and transparency,
2. meni, da se mora v novi strategiji 2020 v celoti odraziti krhek proces okrevanja, ki sedaj poteka, in sicer tako, da se oblikuje skladen in obsežen politični program, ki bo polno vključeval stališča makroekonomske politike, s čimer bi zagotovili, da potrebna konsolidacija proračuna ne bo ogrozila uresničevanja strategije, zlasti ne v boju proti brezposelnosti, pa tudi ne pri ustreznih in dobro usklajenih naložbah v infrastrukturo in znanje;
Believes that the fragile recovery process now under way must be fully reflected in a new 2020 strategy through the formulation of a coherent and comprehensive policy agenda, fully integrating the macroeconomic policy approach so as to ensure that necessary budgetary consolidation will not undermine realisation of the strategy, especially with regard to the fight against unemployment, as well as adequate and well coordinated investment in infrastructures and knowledge;
4. meni, da Evropska unija potrebuje enotno razvojno strategijo z jasno opredeljeno dolgoročno in osrednjo usmeritvijo, kjer bodo združene prekrivajoče se strategije, po katerih naj bi se Unija ta čas ravnala, zlasti lizbonska strategija, strategija trajnostnega razvoja ter pakt stabilnosti in rasti;
Believes that the EU needs a single development strategy, clearly defining long-term and key orientation, and integrating the overlapping strategies that the Union is currently supposed to follow, notably the Lisbon Strategy, the Sustainable Development Strategy and the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP);
Okrevanje in preoblikovanje
Recovery and transformation
10. meni, da je okrepljeno načelo solidarnosti, ki je neposredno povezano z osnovnim namenom evroobmočja, nujnost, saj krepi zmožnost evroobmočja za odzivanje na asimetrične šoke in špekulativne napade;
Considers a reinforced solidarity principle to be imperative, being directly related to the core purpose of the eurozone, since it reinforces the eurozone’s capacity to respond to asymmetric shocks and speculative attacks;
Nov dogovor za trajnost in solidarnost
A new deal for sustainability and solidarity
17. poudarja, kako pomembne so pri oblikovanju novih trajnostnih politik naložbe v ustrezno infrastrukturo, trajnostne prometne rešitve in podpora politikam za majhna in srednja podjetja, nenazadnje ob upoštevanju njihove osrednje vloge v boju proti visoki brezposelnosti;
Emphasises the importance, in terms of building these new sustainable policies, of investment in appropriate infrastructures, sustainable transport solutions and supporting policies for SMEs, not least with regard to their essential role in the fight against high unemployment;
30. priznava, da je eden od neuspehov lizbonske strategije razkorak med objavljenimi ambicijami ter sredstvi na voljo; poudarja, da je strategija 2020 lahko verodostojna le, če je ustrezno financirana; zato meni, da je treba proračun EU prilagoditi tako, da bo prispeval k uresničitvi nove strategije;
Acknowledges that one of the Lisbon Strategy’s failures has been the gap between its declared ambitions and the resources made available; emphasises that a 2020 strategy can be credible only if it is adequately funded; considers, therefore, that the EU budget should be adapted to contribute to the realisation of a new strategy;
32. meni, da se mora proračun EU po letu 2013 osredotočiti na osrednje politične prednostne naloge v novi strategiji 2020, da bi povečali raven odhodkov EU do dogovorjene zgornje meje 1,24% bruto nacionalnega dohodka ter uvedli nov sistem virov;
Considers that the post-2013 EU budget must focus on the key policy priorities of a new 2020 strategy, aiming to increase the level of EU expenditure to the agreed ceiling of 1.24% of gross national income and to introduce a new system of resources;
35. priznava, da lizbonsko strategijo ovira nizka raven demokratične in politične odgovornosti na nacionalni in regionalni ravni; meni, da je zato potreben nov sistem upravljanja na podlagi novih določb Lizbonske pogodbe;
Acknowledges that the Lisbon Strategy has been hampered by low levels of democratic and political ownership at national and regional levels; considers therefore that a new system of governance, based on the new provisions of the Lisbon Treaty, is needed;
37. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj Parlamentu priznata osrednjo vlogo pri izvajanju strategije 2020, kar je treba zapisati v medinstitucionalni sporazum, s katerim bi določili in formalno opredelili demokratično in učinkovito pot naprej, kjer pa se mora Svet zavezati, da v prihodnjih letih strategije ne bo spreminjal brez uradnega posvetovanja s Parlamentom;
Urges the Council and the Commission to acknowledge Parliament’s key role in implementing a 2020 strategy, to be formulated within an inter-institutional agreement to set down and formalise a democratic and effective way forward, which should include a commitment by the Council not to agree changes to the strategy in coming years without having formally consulted Parliament;
40. poziva k večji uporabi pravno zavezujočih ukrepov, kot so uredbe in direktive, ter k možnosti sankcij ali pobud za države članice, če izvajanje nove strategije ne bi dovolj napredovalo;
Calls for greater use of legally binding measures, such as regulations and directives, and possible sanctions or incentives for Member States in case of insufficient progress on implementation of the new strategy;
43. poudarja, da Evropska unija ne more doseči ciljev, ki naj bi jih določila strategija 2020, brez širše in bolj poglobljene zunanje politike, ki bi združevala skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko, trgovinsko in razvojno politiko ter politiko o sodelovanju, s čimer bi globalizacijo spremenili iz vira negativnega pritiska na okoljske in socialne standarde v svetovno orodje za njihov napredek; opozarja na nove določbe Lizbonske pogodbe o usklajevanju zunanje politike Evropske unije, ki bodo prispevale k tej novi poglobljeni strategiji in jih je treba uporabiti kot sredstva za večjo usklajenost politike za razvoj;
Stresses that the EU cannot achieve the goals to be set in a 2020 strategy without a broader and more comprehensive external policy, bringing together the Common Foreign and Security Policy, trade, development, and cooperation policies, so as to turn globalisation from a source of downward pressure on environmental and social standards into a global instrument for their advancement; points to the new provisions of the Lisbon Treaty concerning coordination of EU external policy, which will help to contribute to this new comprehensive strategy and should be used as a means of promoting policy coherence for development (PCD);
45. poudarja pomen skupne evropske strategije v vseh mednarodnih institucijah in forumih, da bi določili boljša pravila v prid poštene trgovine, dostojnega dela in reguliranih finančnih trgov; poudarja, da sem sodi tudi, da Evropska unija prevzame vodilno vlogo v pogajanjih WTO, da bi čim prej zaključili razvojni krog iz Dohe;
Stresses the importance of a common European strategy in all international institutions and forums, with a view to shaping better rules in favour of fair trade, decent work and regulated financial markets; and points out that this should include the EU taking the lead in the WTO negotiations in order to conclude the Doha development round as soon as possible;
3.3.2010 B7-0152/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
3.3.2010 B7-0152/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o položaju civilne družbe in narodnostnih manjšin v Belorusiji
on the situation of civil society and national minorities in Belarus
PE433.014v01-00 B7‑0152/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o položaju civilne družbe in narodnostnih manjšin v Belorusiji
PE433.014v01-00 B7‑0152/2010 European Parliament resolution on the situation of civil society and national minorities in Belarus
– ob upoštevanju izidov 2996. seje Sveta za splošne zadeve z dne 22. februarja 2010 in izjave visoke predstavnice lady Ashton o položaju Združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji z dne 16. februarja 2010,
– having regard to the outcome of the 2996th Foreign Affairs Council meeting of 22 February 2010 and to the statement by the High Representative, Lady Ashton, on the situation of the Union of Poles in Belarus of 16 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirne konvencije Sveta Evrope o varstvu narodnih manjšin z dne 1. februarja 1995,
– having regard to the Council of Europe Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities of 1 February 1995,
A. ker so 15. februarja v Belorusiji aretirali 40 aktivistov, v glavnem pripadnikov Združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji, med katerimi so bili tudi Andzelika Borys (predsednica tega združenja), Igor Bancer (predstavnik za stike z javnostjo), Mieczyslaw Jaskiewicz (podpredsednik), Andrzej Poczobut (predsednik nadzornega odbora) in Anatol Lebedzka, vodja opozicijske Združene civilne stranke v Belorusiji, da bi jim preprečili udeležbo na sojenju v zvezi z Poljsko hišo v Ivancu; ker so 20. februarja vse aktiviste izpustili na prostost,
A. whereas on 15 February 40 activists, mainly members of the Union of Poles in Belarus, were arrested in Belarus, including Angelika Borys (Chairwoman of the UPB), Igor Bancer (Spokesman of the UPB), Mieczyslaw Jaskiewicz (Vice-Chairman), Andrzej Poczobut (President of the UPB Supervisory Board) and Anatol Lebedzka, the leader of the opposition United Civil Party in Belarus, in order to prevent them from taking part in the trial concerning the Polish House in Ivyanets; whereas by 20 February all the activists were released,
B. ker državne oblasti ne priznavajo Združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji pod vodstvom Andzelike Borys, ki je bila dvakrat demokratično izvoljena, in sicer leta 2005 in 2009, ker se to združenje od leta 2005 redno sooča s šikaniranjem in preganjanjem in ker so bili njegovi člani večkrat obtoženi nezakonitih dejavnosti in jim zato grozijo kazenske obtožbe,
B. whereas the Union of Poles in Belarus under the Chairmanship of Angelika Borys, who has been democratically elected twice in 2005 and in 2009, is not recognised by the state authorities and has been facing regular harassment and persecution since 2005 and whereas its members are being repeatedly accused of illegal activities and facing criminal charges,
C. ker beloruske oblasti kot legitimnega vodjo Združenja Poljakov priznavajo Stanislawa Siemaszka in podpirajo organizacijo pod njegovim vodstvom, kar je po prepričanju poljske vlade nezakonito,
C. whereas the Belarusian authorities consider Stanislaw Siemaszko to be the legitimate leader of the Union of Poles and declare support for the organisation under his leadership, considered illegitimate by the Polish Government,
D. ker je Poljsko hišo v Ivancu leta 2003 kupilo Združenje Poljakov pod vodstvom Andzelike Borys in je po zakonu last te organizacije,
D. whereas the Polish House in Ivyanets was purchased by the UPB, chaired by Angelika Borys, in 2003 and is by law the property of this organisation,
E. ker je bila Teresa Sobal (predsednica podružnice Združenja Poljakov v Ivancu) na sojenju za zaprtimi vrati 8. februarja obtožena domnevno „nepooblaščenega“ prevzema Poljske hiše in ker je 15. februarja sodišče razsodilo, da je treba lastnino vrniti nezakonitemu združenju, ki ga podpira beloruska vlada,
E. whereas on 8 February in a trial held in camera, Teresa Sobal (Chairwoman of the Ivyanets branch of the UPB) was charged with alleged 'unauthorised' seizure of the Polish House and the trial on 15 February determined that this property must be returned to the illegitimate Union supported by the Belarusian Government,
F. ker je bila Polonica, podjetje s sedežem v Grodnem, ki ga vodi Andzelika Borys in ki je edini vir financiranja združenja, oglobljena v višini 71 milijonov rubljev za domnevno kršitev davčnih predpisov in ji zaradi tega grozi stečaj,
F. whereas the 'Polonica', a Hrodna-based company headed by Angelika Borys, the only source of funding for the UPB, has been fined 71 m roubles for allegedly violating tax regulations and is now in danger of bankruptcy,
G. ker je diskriminacija Združenja Poljakov, največje nevladne organizacije v Belorusiji, odraz splošnega ravnanja s civilno družbo in demokratično opozicijo v Belorusiji,
G. whereas the discrimination against the Union of Poles, the largest NGO operating in Belarus, is symptomatic of the general treatment of civil society and the democratic opposition in Belarus,
H. ker beloruska ustava zagotavlja svobodo združevanja in spoštovanja pravic manjšin,
H. whereas the Constitution of Belarus guarantees freedom of assembly and respect for minority rights,
2. obsoja posredovanje policije proti Združenju Poljakov in vse poskuse beloruskih oblasti, da bi poljski skupnosti vsilile novo vodstvo; poudarja, da je Združenje Poljakov organizacija, ki si prizadeva za izobraževalne in kulturne dejavnosti in ni politična stranka; zato poziva beloruske oblasti, naj mu dovolijo svobodno delovanje in izpolnjevanje nalog v skladu z njegovimi statuti;
Condemns the police action against the Union of Poles and any attempts by the Belarusian authorities to impose a new leadership on the Polish community; stresses that the Union of Poles is an organisation which pursues educational and cultural activities and not a political party; calls therefore on the Belarusian authorities to allow it to operate freely and fulfil the tasks provided for in its Statutes;
5. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, parlamentarnim skupščinam Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi in Sveta Evrope, sekretariatu Skupnosti neodvisnih držav ter vladi in parlamentu Belorusije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe, the Secretariat of the Commonwealth of Independent States and the Government and Parliament of Belarus.
3.3.2010 B7-0153/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0000/2010
3.3.2010 B7-0153/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0000/2010
o strategiji EU 2020 ob pripravi na spomladansko zasedanje Evropskega sveta
on the EU 2020 Strategy in view of the preparation of the European Spring Council
PE433.015v01-00 B7‑0153/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU 2020 ob pripravi na spomladansko zasedanje Evropskega sveta
PE433.015v01-00 B7‑0153/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU 2020 Strategy in view of the preparation of the European Spring Council
– ob upoštevanju neformalnega zasedanja Evropskega sveta z dne 11. februarja 2010,
– having regard to the Informal European Council of 11 February 2010,
– ob upoštevanju javnega posvetovanja na pobudo Komisije o EU 2020 ter njegovih rezultatov (SEK (2010)116),
– having regard to the public consultation launched by the Commission on EU 2020 and its outcome (SEC(2010)116),
– ob upoštevanju ocene Komisije o lizbonski strategiji (SEK (2010)114),
– having regard to the Lisbon strategy evaluation by the Commission (SEC(2010)114),
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 3 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja Komisiji z dne 23. februarja 2010 o kmetijstvu in prihodnji strategiji EU 2020 ( O-0023/2010 – B7-0000/2010),
– having regard to the question of 23 February 2010 to the Commission on Agriculture and the future ‘EU 2020’ Strategy ( O-0023/2010 – B7‑0000/2010),
A. ker morajo vsako dolgoročno strategijo spremljati tudi konkretni ukrepi za reševanje trenutnih pomislekov in skrbi evropskih državljanov in ker bi morala strategija EU 2020 pomagati pri doseganju našega glavnega cilja – zagotavljanja gospodarske rasti in delovnih mest,
A. whereas any long-term strategy must be combined with concrete action to respond to the immediate concerns and fears of European citizens, and whereas the EU 2020 Strategy should serve our main goal which is economic growth and jobs,
B. ker je bila lizbonska strategija le delno uspešna zaradi šibke strukture upravljanja in pomanjkanja odgovornosti držav članic,
B. whereas the Lisbon strategy has only partly been successful due to weak governance structure and lack of accountability of the Member States,
C. ker je treba pozdraviti prizadevanja Komisije za doseganje trajnostnega socialnega tržnega gospodarstva, tj. gospodarstva, ki bo bolj vključujoče, pametnejše in vzdržljivejše,
C. whereas the Commission’s efforts to achieve a sustainable social market economy – i.e. an inclusive, smarter and sustainable economy – are to be welcomed,
D. ker je obžalovanja vredno, da Komisija svoje strategije ni osredotočila na spodbujanje ter podpiranje majhnih in srednjih podjetij; ker se v tem sektorju ustvari največ delovnih mest in ker so potrebni praktični ukrepi za poenostavljanje upravnih postopkov ter spodbujanje in udejanjanje inovativnih idej v teh panogah; ker financiranje ne sme biti osredotočeno zgolj na ustvarjanje „zelenih“ delovnih mest,
D. whereas it is regrettable that the Commission has not concentrated its strategy on the promotion and support of small and medium-sized enterprises; whereas most jobs are created in this sector and practical measures are needed to reduce red tape and to promote and implement innovative ideas in these industries; whereas funding should not be focused solely on the creation of ‘green’ jobs,
E. ker pomembnih inovacij, kot so e-mobilnost, sončna tehnologija in številne druge, ne bo mogoče proizvajati v Evropi, če se ne vzpostavi okvir za zagotavljanje oskrbe s surovinami;
E. whereas major innovations such as e-mobility, solar technology and many more will not be able to be produced in Europe if we do not set up a framework for securing the supply of raw materials,
F. ker na javnem posvetovanju Komisije o prihodnji strategiji EU 2020 sploh nista bila omenjena kmetijstvo ter kmetijsko-prehrambena industrija in ker je to treba nemudoma popraviti, saj kmetijski in prehrambeni sektor skupaj predstavljata ključni del gospodarstva EU, ki zajema 19,2 milijona delovnih mest (9 % vseh zaposlenih) in 4,3 % BDP sedemindvajseterice EU,
F. whereas the Commission’s Consultation on the future EU 2020 Strategy makes no mention whatsoever of agriculture and the agri-food business, and whereas this omission needs to be rectified immediately, given that the combined agricultural and food sector represents a key part of the EU economy accounting for 19.2 million jobs (9% of total employment) and for 4.3% of GDP in the EU-27,
G. ker se je strategija EU 2020 začela med evropskim letom boja proti revščini in ker je treba nameniti pozornost izkoreninjenju revščine in socialnim vidikom lizbonske agende,
G. whereas the EU 2020 Strategy is being launched during the European Year against poverty, and attention has to be paid to the eradication of poverty and the social aspect of the Lisbon Agenda,
H. ker nova Lizbonska pogodba zajema kohezijsko politiko, ki je tudi mehanizem za doseganje tam zastavljenih ciljev, zato mora biti sestavni del strategije 2020, če države članice želijo, da bi bila ta nova politika za gospodarsko rast in delovna mesta uspešna; ker bi strategija 2020 morala v splošnih in posebnih okoliščinah upoštevati ustreznost te politike ter tudi dejstvo, da je dobro financirana politika regionalnega razvoja po letu 2013 nujna za vse države članice EU, če te želijo zagotoviti trajnostno socialno tržno gospodarstvo in rast,
H. whereas cohesion policy is covered by the new Lisbon Treaty, is an instrument to achieve the goals defined there and must be an integral part of the 2020 Strategy if the Member States want this new policy for Growth and Jobs to work; whereas the 2020 Strategy should value the relevance of this policy, both in general and exceptional conditions and should take into consideration the fact that a well-financed post-2013 regional development policy is indispensable for all EU Member States, if they aim for a sustainable social market economy and growth,
1. ob ugotavljanju, da sta Komisija in predsednik Barroso poudarila ključno vlogo Evropskega parlamenta v strategiji 2020, poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj v celoti spoštujeta pravice Parlamenta pri oblikovanju in izvajanju strategije, s čimer se bo okrepila njena demokratična legitimnost v očeh civilne družbe;
Asks the Commission and the Council – recalling that the Commission and its President Barroso have underlined the crucial role of the European Parliament in the EU 2020 Strategy – to fully respect Parliament’s prerogatives in the elaboration and implementation of the strategy in order to enhance its democratic legitimacy in the eyes of civil society;
Odločno evropsko upravljanje za uspešno strategijo 2020
Strong European governance for a successful 2020 Strategy .
3. poudarja, da mora usklajena in konkretna evropska zakonodaja upoštevati raznolikost v EU, in zato oblikovati močno ter pregledno strukturo upravljanja, ki bo v celoti spoštovala načelo subsidiarnosti, kot ga določa Lizbonska pogodba;
Emphasises that coordinated and concrete European legislation must take into account the diversity that exists across the EU, and therefore incorporate a strong and transparent governance structure that fully respects the subsidiarity principle as laid down in the Lisbon Treaty;
5. poudarja, da bo bolj trajnostno socialno tržno gospodarstvo mogoče doseči le, če cilje ter strategije podpirajo usmerjeni in ustrezno usklajeni vladni ukrepi;
Points out that a more sustainable social market economy can be achieved only if the objectives and strategies are supported by targeted government action and are properly coordinated;
8. meni, da mora biti oblikovanje enotnega trga za proizvode maloprodajnih finančnih storitev pomemben element strategije 2020;
Considers that the creation of a single market for retail financial service products must be an important element of the 2020 Strategy;