natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
18. ugotavlja, da je sedanji direktor po zunanji reviziji naknadnega preverjanja podpisal nalog za izterjavo, po katerem naj bi prejšnji direktor vrnil znesek 2014,94 EUR, od česar je bilo doslej izterjanih samo 43,45 EUR; obžaluje, da je bil izterjan tako majhen znesek glede na finančne izgube, ki jih je akademija utrpela pod vodstvom prejšnjega direktorja; je seznanjen z dejstvom, da je bilo zadnje opozorilo o dolgu izdano leta 2011 in da je naslednji korak sprožitev postopka pred angleškim sodiščem, da se ugotovi zakonitost dolga iz leta 2007, če bo sodba zadovoljiva, pa bo nato preostanek dolga skušala izterjati služba za izterjavo; poziva sedanjega direktorja, naj organ za podelitev razrešnice obvešča o razvoju dogodkov v tej zadevi;
Acknowledges that, as a result of an external audit on an ex-post check, the current Director initiated a recovery order requiring the former Director to return the sum of EUR 2014,94 of which only EUR 43,45 have been recovered to date; regrets the small amount recovered compared to the financial loss that the College incurred under the management of the former Director; takes note that a final reminder for payment has been issued in 2011 and that the next step is to institute proceedings before an English court to establish the legality of the debt, dating from 2007, and, should the appropriate judgement be obtained, the enforcement service will seek to recover the remainder of the unpaid debt; calls on the current Director to keep the discharge authority updated with regard to the development of this matter;
Večletni akcijski načrt akademije za obdobje 2010–2014
The College's MAP for 2010-2014
- objavo mesečnega biltena in rednih poročil o napredku za upravni odbor, da imajo njegovi člani na voljo jasnejšo analizo stanja na področju dejavnosti akademije;
- publish a monthly newsletter and regular progress reports on its activities for its Governing Board in order to provide them with a clearer analysis of the status of the College’s activities;
- redno posodabljanje poročila o napredku pri izvajanju večletnega akcijskega načrta;
- regularly update its progress report on the level of implementation of its MAP;
- posredovanje letnih poročil službe za notranjo revizijo Parlamentu, v skladu z zadevnimi določbami finančne uredbe;
- provide Parliament with the IAS' annual reports pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Financial Regulation;
24. glede ugotovitev horizontalne narave, ki spremljajo sklep o razrešnici, se sklicuje na svojo resolucijo z dne 10. maja 2011
Refers, in respect of the other observations accompanying its Decision on discharge, which are of a horizontal nature, to its resolution of 10 May 2011
269. o uspešnosti, finančnem poslovodenju in nadzoru agencij.
269. on the performance, financial management and control of the agencies.
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi ukrepa Evropske unije za znak evropske dediščine
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta v prvi obravnavi (10303/1/2011 – C7‑0236/2011 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (10303/1/2011 – C7‑0236/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju obrazloženega mnenja o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, ki ga je v okviru Protokola št. 2 predložil francoski senat in v katerem trdi, da se osnutek zakonodajnega akta ne sklada z načelom subsidiarnosti,
– having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of the Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
Sprejeta besedila z dne 16.12.2010, P7_TA(2010)0486 . o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0076 ),
Texts adopted of 16.12.2010, P7_TA(2010)0486 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0076 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A7-0331/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Culture and Education ( A7-0331/2011 ),
Predhodni akti in postopek
Background and procedure
Komisija je 9. marca 2010 predložila predlog za sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uvedbi ukrepa Evropske unije za znak evropske dediščine.
On 9 March 2010, the Commission submitted a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Union action for the European Heritage Label.
Besedilo je obravnavalo špansko, belgijsko in madžarsko predsedstvo Sveta ministrov Evropske unije (Svet).
The text has been examined under the Spanish, Belgian and Hungarian Presidencies of the Council of Ministers of the European Union (Council).
Odbor regij je mnenje o predlogu Komisije sprejel 9. junija 2010
The European Committee of Regions adopted its opinion on the Commission's proposal on 9 June 2010.
UL C 267, 1.10.2010, str.
OJ C 267, 1.10.2010, p.
Evropski parlament je na zasedanju 16. decembra 2010 v prvi obravnavi sprejel zakonodajno resolucijo, ki spreminja predlog Komisije
During its sitting of 16 December 2010 the European Parliament (EP) adopted at first reading a legislative resolution amending the Commission’s proposal
Odbor za kulturo in izobraževanje je na seji 3. marca 2011 sprejel sklep o obsegu pogajalskega mandata na bližnjih pogajanjih s Svetom, da bi dosegli zgodnji dogovor v drugi obravnavi, ter o članih pogajalske ekipe.
At its meeting of 3 March 2011, the Committee on Culture and Education (CULT) took a decision on the scope of its mandate in its forthcoming negotiations with the Council, with a view to an early second reading agreement, as well as on who the members of the negotiating team should be.
V skladu z določbami člena 294(5) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Skupne izjave o praktičnih ureditvah za postopek soodločanja
In accordance with the provisions of Article 294(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and the joint declaration on practical arrangements governing the codecision procedure
5. sta se Svet in Parlament dvakrat srečala na neformalnih tristranskih srečanjih (22. marca in 12. aprila), da bi dosegla dogovor v drugi obravnavi.
5. , two informal trialogue meetings (on 22 March and on 12 April) took place between the Council and the EP, with a view to reaching an agreement at second reading.
Doseženi dogovor je bil potrjen v odboru stalnih predstavnikov 15. aprila 2011 ter v pismu predsedniku COREPER I, ki ga je 9. maja 2011 poslal predsednik Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje.
The resulting agreement was confirmed by COREPER on 15 April 2011 and in a letter from the Chair of the Committee on Culture & Education to the chair of COREPER I dated 9 May 2011.
Svet je 19. julija 2011 sprejel svoje stališče v prvi obravnavi in vanj vključil dogovor v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom iz člena 294 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije.
The Council adopted its position at first reading incorporating the agreement on 19 July 2011, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure laid down in Article 294 of the TFEU.
Cilj predloga je krepiti čut pripadnosti Evropski uniji pri evropskih državljanih s temeljem na skupnih elementih zgodovine in dediščine, pa tudi ceniti raznolikost ter poglobiti medkulturni dialog.
The aim of the proposal is to strengthen European citizens’ sense of belonging to the European Union, based on shared elements of history and heritage, as well as an appreciation of diversity, and to strengthen intercultural dialogue.
Medvladna pobuda Predlog razširja medvladno pobudo iz leta 2006.
Intergovernmental initiative : The proposal extends an intergovernmental initiative launched in 2006.
Hkrati je odgovor na sklepe Sveta, sprejete 20. novembra 2008, v katerih je pozval Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog, ki bo to pobudo preoblikoval v formalni ukrep Unije, s čimer bi izboljšali njeno kakovost in učinkovitost ter ji zagotovili dolgoročni uspeh.
It responds to the conclusions adopted by the Council on 20 November 2008, inviting the Commission to submit a proposal transforming this initiative into a formal action of the Union, in order to improve its quality and efficiency and ensure its long-term success.
Nova merila in postopek spremljanja Predlog uvaja nova skupna, jasna in pregledna merila za znak, ki jih bodo izvajale vse sodelujoče države članice.
New criteria and monitoring procedure : The proposal introduces new common, clear and transparent criteria for the label, which would be applied by all participating Member States.
Sodelovanje bo prostovoljno.
Participation will be voluntary.
Po novih postopkih izbire in spremljanja bodo znak prejela le najprimernejša spomeniška območja, tista, ki meril ne bodo več izpolnjevala, pa ga bodo izgubila.
New selection and monitoring procedures will ensure that only the most relevant sites are awarded the label, and that those that no longer meet the requisite criteria would lose it.
Dodana vrednost V predlogu je posebna pozornost namenjena dodani vrednosti tega znaka v primerjavi z drugimi pobudami na področju kulturne dediščine.
Added value : Special attention is given in the proposal to the added value of this label as compared to other initiatives within the field of cultural heritage.
Pri znaku ne gre za lepoto spomeniškega območja oziroma njegovo arhitekturno kakovost, ampak za njegovo simbolno vrednost pri evropskem povezovanju in zgodovini Unije.
The label is not about a site's beauty or its architectural quality, but rather its symbolic value for European integration and the history of the Union.
Ravno tako ne gre za ohranjanje teh območij, ampak za dejavnosti, ki jih lahko ponudijo ter njihovo izobraževalno razsežnost, zlasti za mlade.
It is not about conservation of sites in itself, but rather about the activities they can offer and their educational dimension, especially for young people.
Nenazadnje bodo spomeniška območja s tem znakom zaradi skupnega sodelovanja bolj prepoznavna.
Finally, it will help labelled sites become more effective through their working together.
Zakonodajni resoluciji Parlamenta, ki je bila v prvi obravnavi sprejeta z veliko večino (497 glasov za, 18 proti in 41 vzdržanih glasov), je bilo priloženih 62 predlogov sprememb.
The Parliament’s legislative resolution, adopted by a large majority at first reading (497 votes in favour, 18 against and 41 abstentions) was accompanied by 62 amendments.
Velika večina teh predlogov obravnava manj pomembna vprašanja in so dodatno izboljšali besedilo.
A great majority of those amendments dealt with relatively minor issues and contributed to further improving the text.
Poročevalka je obravnavala naslednja vprašanja: število spomeniških območij, ki se jim podeli ta znak, kako pogosto poteka izbirni postopek, jasna razlika med novim ukrepom EU in sedanjo medvladno pobudo ter odnos med spomeniškimi območji, ki prejmejo ta znak sedaj in v prihodnje.
Among the issues addressed by the rapporteur were: the number of sites to be awarded the label; how often the selection procedure will occur; a clear distinction between the new EU action and the current intergovernmental initiative, and the relationship between current and future recipient sites of the label.
Najpomembnejše so bile spremembe na naslednjih področjih:
The most important modifications covered the following issues:
Pogostost izbora Čeprav je Komisija predlagala, da se znak podeljuje vsako leto, so države članice menile, da bi z izborom spomeniških območij vsaki dve leti zagotovili boljšo kakovost izbirnega postopka ter izbranih območij.
Frequency of selection: Although the Commission proposed to award the label each year, Members considered that selection of the sites every two years would ensure better quality of the selection process as well as of the selected sites.
Nadnacionalna spomeniška območja in kvote Za prijave za nadnacionalna spomeniška območja velja isti postopek kot za druga območja.
Transnational sites and quotas: Applications from transnational sites should follow the same procedure as those from any other sites.
Po mnenju članic morajo vse sodelujoče države v predizboru izbrati največ dve spomeniški območji.
Members felt that sites must be pre-selected by all of the Member States involved, within their limit of a maximum of two sites.
Nadnacionalna spomeniška območja morajo območje v eni od sodelujočih držav imenovati za svojega koordinatorja, ki bo enotna kontaktna točka za Komisijo.
Transnational sites should designate one of the sites involved as their coordinator, to be the Commission's single contact point.
Žirija Evropsko žirijo mora sestavljati 13 članov, med katerimi mora enega imenovati Odbor regij.
Panel : The European panel should consist of 13 members, one of whom should be nominated by the Committee of the Regions.
Evropsko žirijo naj sestavljajo strokovnjaki na področju kulture, ki pokrivajo vsa področja, povezana s cilji znaka evropske dediščine, poleg tega pa morajo biti enakovredno zastopane vse države članice.
The European panel should consist of cultural experts covering all fields related to the objectives of the EHL, whilst also upholding equitable representation by all Member States.
Več informacij Komisija bi morala Evropski parlament, Svet in Odbor regij obveščati na vseh fazah izbirnega postopka: v fazi predizbora spomeniških območij v državah članicah, ob izboru, ki ga opravi evropska žirija, ob imenovanju izbranih spomeniških območij s strani Komisije in kadar se spomeniškemu območju znak odvzame ali se mu območje odpove.
Reinforced information: The Commission should inform the European Parliament, the Council and the Committee of the Regions at each stage of the selection process: pre-selection of the sites by the Member States, selection by the European Panel, designation of the selected sites by the Commission, withdrawal of the label from a site and renunciation of the label by a site.
Odvzem znaka članice so menile, da bi morala biti zaradi preglednosti v postopek odvzema znaka vključena žirija.
Withdrawal from the label : Members considered that the jury should be involved in the procedure of withdrawal for reasons of transparency.
Spomeniška območja se lahko kadar koli odrečejo znaku evropske dediščine.
Sites may at any time choose to renounce the European Heritage Label.
Prehodne ureditve Po mnenju članic za ohranjanje ugleda starega znaka in dviganje ugleda novega niso potrebne prehodne odločbe.
Transitional arrangements : in order to preserve the prestige of the old label and promote the prestige of the new one, Members suggested that no transitional provisions should be needed.
Prva obravnava v Svetu
Council's first reading
Podlaga za prvo obravnavo v Svetu je bil dogovor, sklenjen po prvi obravnavi v Parlamentu.
The Council's first reading is based on the agreement negotiated after Parliament's first reading.
Bistveni elementi tega dogovora, ki v celoti, delno ali v duhu vključuje veliko večino predlogov sprememb Parlamenta, so:
The key elements of this agreement, which incorporated fully, in part or in spirit the great majority of Parliament's first-reading amendments, are as follows:
i) Izbor spomeniških območij (členi 10(2), 11(2) in 12(2)) : Vsaka država članica lahko v predizbirnem postopku vsaki dve leti izbere največ dve spomeniški območji, nacionalno in nadnacionalno spomeniško območje.
i) Selection of sites (Article 10(2), Article 11(2), Article 12(2)) : Each Member State may pre-select up to two sites every two years: both a national and a transnational site.
Kvota za nadnacionalno spomeniško območje se uporabi samo za državo koordinatorko, da ne bi držav članic odvračali od dejanskega sodelovanja pri teh območjih.
The quota for the transnational site is used for the coordinating country only in order not to discourage Member States from actually taking part in these sites.
Žirija neodvisnih strokovnjakov izbere največ eno spomeniško območje v vsaki državi, ki je upravičeno do podelitve znaka.
A panel of independent experts will choose a maximum of one site per country to be eligible for the label.
ii) Geografsko področje uporabe (člen 4, člen 18(1), uvodna izjava 13): Pri ukrepu Unije lahko sodeluje 27 držav članic.
ii) Geographical scope (Article 4, Article 18(1), Recital 13) : The Union action is open to 27 Member States.
Pri prvi oceni tega ukrepa je treba preučiti razširitev geografskega področja uporabe.
During the first evaluation of this action a widening of its geographical scope should be examined.
iii) Prehodne določbe (člen 19, uvodna izjava 11): Prehodne določbe so jasnejše in enostavnejše.
iii) Transitional provisions (Article 19, Recital 11) : Transitional provisions are clarified and simplified.
iv) Nacionalna spomeniška območja (člen 20): Več spomeniških območij v eni državi članici lahko odda eno prijavo s poudarkom na posebni tematiki.
iv) National thematic sites (Article 20): Several sites located in the same Member State may put forward a single application focusing on a specific theme.
Poročevalka priporoča, naj se stališče Sveta v prvi obravnavi sprejme brez sprememb in brez odlašanja.
The rapporteur recommends the adoption, without amendment and with no further delay, of the first reading position of the Council.
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Maria Badia i Cutchet, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Jean-Marie Cavada, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Marek Henryk Migalski, Katarína Neveďalová, Doris Pack, Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Hannu Takkula, Sampo Terho, László Tőkés, Helga Trüpel, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Maria Badia i Cutchet, Malika Benarab-Attou, Lothar Bisky, Jean-Marie Cavada, Santiago Fisas Ayxela, Mary Honeyball, Cătălin Sorin Ivan, Petra Kammerevert, Morten Løkkegaard, Marek Henryk Migalski, Katarína Neveďalová, Doris Pack, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Marie-Thérèse Sanchez-Schmid, Marietje Schaake, Marco Scurria, Hannu Takkula, Sampo Terho, László Tőkés, Helga Trüpel, Sabine Verheyen, Milan Zver
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma o spodbujanju, zagotavljanju in uporabi satelitskih navigacijskih sistemov Galileo in GPS ter podobnih aplikacij med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi strani
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (11117/2011),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (11117/2011),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma o spodbujanju, zagotavljanju in uporabi satelitskih navigacijskih sistemov Galileo in GPS ter podobnih aplikacij med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi strani (11575/2011),
– having regard to the draft Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of GALILEO and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part (11575/2011),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členoma 171 in 172 ter točko a drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0185/2011 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 171 and 172 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) and Article 218(8), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7‑0185/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju členov 81, 90(8) in 46(1) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0332/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0332/2011 ),
o organiziranem kriminalu v Evropski uniji
on organised crime in the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ...................................22
OPINION of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality ...22
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, člena 67, poglavja 4 (členi od 82 do 86) in poglavja 5 (členi od 87 do 89) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to Article 3 of the Treaty on European Union, Article 67, Chapter 4 (Articles 82-86) and Chapter 5 (Articles 87-89) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice
– having regard to the Stockholm Programme on freedom, security and justice
UL C 115, 11.05.10, str.
OJ C 115, 11.5.2010, p.
1. , sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Zagotavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane Evrope: Akcijski načrt izvajanja stockholmskega programa“( KOM(2010)0171 ) in sporočila Komisije „Izvajanje strategije notranje varnosti EU: pet korakov k varnejši Evropi“ ( KOM(2010)0673 ),
1. , the Commission communication ‘Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens – Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme’ ( COM(2010)0171 ) and the Commission communication ‘The EU internal security strategy in action: five steps towards a more secure Europe’ ( COM(2010)0673 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 8. in dne 9. novembra 2010 o vzpostavitvi in izvajanju svežnja politik EU za boj proti hudim in organiziranim oblikam mednarodnega kriminala,
– having regard to the conclusions of the JHA Council of 8 and 9 November 2010 on the establishment and implementation of an EU policy cycle to combat international serious and organised crime,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/841/PNZ s 24. oktobra 2008 o boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on the fight against organised crime
UL L 300, 11.11.08, str.
OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju konvencije Združenih narodov proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu, sprejete na generalni skupščini 15. novembra 2000 (resolucija 55/25) in njenih protokolov, še posebej protokola za preprečevanje, zatiranje in kaznovanje trgovine z ljudmi, zlasti z ženskami in otroki, protokola o boju proti trgovini z migranti po kopnem, po morju in po zraku ter protokola proti nezakoniti proizvodnji strelnega orožja, delov in sestavnih delov ter streliva in trgovini z njimi,
– having regard to the UN Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, adopted by the General Assembly on 15 November 2000 (Resolution 55/25), and its Protocols, in particular the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air and the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvrševanju sklepov o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/212/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence, Council Framework Decision 2005/212/JHA of 24 February 2005
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2007/845/PNZ z dne 6. decembra 2007
– having regard to Council Decision 2007/845/JHA of 6 December 2007
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o zasegu in odvzemu premoženjske koristi (7769/3/10),
– having regard to the Council Conclusions on Confiscation and Asset Recovery (7769/3/10),