natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se zaveda, da "osebe, ki so presegle dovoljeno obdobje bivanja" in so v središču predlaganega sistema vstopa/izstopa, najverjetneje predstavljajo največjo kategorijo nezakonitih priseljencev v EU; vseeno zahteva več informacij o podatkih, ki jih je zbral zunanji pogodbenik in po katerih "je bilo leta 2006 v EU25 do osem milijonov nezakonitih priseljencev" SEK(2008)0153 .
Is aware that the so-called 'overstayers', who are central to the proposed entry/exit system, are supposed to represent the biggest category of illegal immigrants in the EU; requests, however, more information on the data collected by an external contractor estimating that 'there were up to 8 million illegal immigrants within the EU25 in 2006' SEC(2008)0153 .
; vztraja tudi, da je treba jasno opredeliti izraz "oseba, ki je presegla dovoljeno obdobje bivanja", vključno z morebitnimi izjemami, ki bi bile mogoče pod določenimi pogoji, ter da je treba izvesti podrobnejšo kvalitativno in kvantitativno analizo o grožnjah/tveganjih/stroških, ki jih te osebe predstavljajo za evropsko družbo;
; insists, moreover, on a clear definition of the term 'overstayer', including the possible exemptions under specific conditions, and a closer qualitative and quantitative analysis of the threats/risks/costs they bring to European society;
poudarja, da bi predlagani sistem in opozorila sicer lahko pripomogli k temu, da bi državljane tretjih držav odvrnili od prekoračitve dovoljenega časa bivanja ter ponudili podatke in informacije o vzorcih, vendar je še vedno potrebno sodelovanje z organi pregona, da bi prijeli posameznike, ki presežejo dovoljeni čas bivanja, zato meni, da predlagani sistem ne bo preprečil pojava prekoračitve dovoljenega obdobja bivanja kot takega;
Points out that, although the proposed system and alert information might help to deter TCNs from overstaying, as well as provide data and information on patterns, further contact with law enforcement agencies is still necessary for an individual who overstays his or her period of admission to be apprehended, and therefore does not believe that the proposed system will put an end to the 'overstay' phenomenon as such;
nima zadostnih informacij o načinu integracije sistema v obstoječi okvir in njegovem delovanju znotraj njega, o morebitnih potrebnih spremembah obstoječih sistemov in o njegovih dejanskih stroških; zato meni, da je dejanska nujnost uvedbe takšnega sistema dvomljiva;
Does not have sufficient information on how this system will be integrated in – and interact with – the existing framework, on the possible changes that might need to be made to existing systems and on the actual costs generated by it; is therefore of the opinion that the absolute need to implement such a system remains doubtful;
opozarja, da bo pravilno delovanje sistema vstopa/izstopa materialno, pa tudi operativno, odvisno od uspeha VIS in SIS II; poudarja, da ta dva instrumenta še vedno nista povsem operativna in ju torej ni mogoče ustrezno oceniti; poudarja, da se porajajo dvomi glede delovanja in zanesljivosti SIS II;
Recalls that the correct functioning of the entry/exit system will depend both materially and operationally on the success of the VIS and SIS II; points out that these instruments are not yet fully operational and that it has thus not yet been possible to evaluate them properly; stresses that the operability and reliability of the SIS II are being called into question;
ugotavlja, da je tudi glede na izkušnje iz ZDA nedvomno veliko težje nadzirati izstop kot vstop, zlasti v zvezi z izstopom na morju in kopnem; poleg tega je glede na iste izkušnje zelo zaskrbljen nad stroškovno učinkovitostjo takega sistema; zaradi tega poziva Komisijo, naj poišče dodatne informacije o dejanskih naložbah, ki jih zahteva takšen sistem;
Notes that, without a doubt and following the lessons learned in the USA, it is more challenging to implement exit capability than entry, and in particular with regard to sea and land exit; furthermore, following the same lessons learned, has considerable concerns about the cost-effectiveness of such a system; therefore calls on the Commission to provide additional information on the actual investment generated by such a system;
Program za registrirane potnike
Registered Traveller Programme (RTP)
načeloma podpira zamisel o programu za registrirane potnike za državljane tretjih držav, ne glede na to, ali za njih velja vizumska obveznost ali ne, ker bi program lahko pripomogel k hitrejšemu pretoku potnikov in odpravi zastojev na vstopnih in izstopnih točkah, kakor tudi možno uporabo avtomatiziranih prehodov za državljane EU, saj veljavna zakonodaja Skupnosti ne dovoljuje poenostavitve mejnih kontrol, razen za državljane tretjih držav, ki živijo na mejnih območjih;
Supports in principle the concept of an RTP for TCNs, whether or not subject to visa requirements, which would help speed up traveller flows and prevent congestion at entry and exit points, and the possible use of automated gates by EU citizens, since Community law as it currently stands does not allow for the simplification of border checks except in the case of TCNs residing in border areas;
poudarja, da je v več državah članicah takšen program za registrirane potnike za državljane tretjih držav že vzpostavljen ali pa je v pripravi, in opozarja na nevarnost, da bi na koncu dobili preplet 27 sistemov, ki bi temeljili na različnih kriterijih, vključno s kriteriji glede varstva podatkov in pristojbin; se zaveda, da želijo Nizozemska, Nemčija, Združeno kraljestvo in agencija FRONTEX "Mednarodni program za pospešeno potovanje" promovirati kot možen načrt za druge države članice;
Points out that several Member States have already set up or are preparing such an RTP for TCNs, and highlights the risk of ending up with a patchwork of twenty-seven systems based on different criteria, including those on data-protection and fees; is aware of the fact that the Netherlands, together with Germany, the UK and FRONTEX, are seeking to promote the 'International Expedited Traveller Programme' as a possible blueprint for other Member States;
priporoča usklajen pristop, zato Komisijo poziva, naj pospeši postopek na podlagi najboljših praks v državah članicah in zagotovi, da bodo države članice še naprej delovale skladno s pravom Skupnosti;
Advocates a harmonised approach and therefore urges the Commission to speed up the process, on the basis of best practices in Member States, and to make sure that Member States continue to act in conformity with Community law;
ugotavlja, da se programi za registrirane potnike za državljane tretjih držav dejansko razlikujejo od tistih za državljane EU; zato poudarja, da je treba te programe vedno jasno ločevati;
Notes that, in fact, RTPs for TCNs are different from RTPs for Union citizens; stresses therefore that a clear distinction between the two must be made at all times;
Elektronski sistem za odobritev potovanj
Electronic System of Travel Authorisation (ESTA)
priznava, da bi bilo pri varnostnih ukrepih nespametno nameniti pozornost samo državljanom tretjih držav, ki v EU potujejo iz držav z vizumsko obveznostjo; vseeno dvomi, da je predlagani sistem resnično potreben, in glede tega želi natančno pojasnitev; je prepričan, da prava pot naprej ni obsežno zbiranje splošnih podatkov, ampak zlasti tesno sodelovanje med obveščevalnimi službami;
Acknowledges that it would be unwise to focus attention in terms of security measures only on TCNs travelling to the EU from countries with a visa requirement; questions, however, whether the proposed system is absolutely necessary and would like a thorough explanation of the rationale for it; is convinced that close cooperation between intelligence services in particular is the right way forward, rather than a massive collection of data in general;
želi biti obveščen o natančnem časovnem razporedu in podrobnostih študije, ki jo predvideva Komisija;
Wishes to be informed on the exact timetable and the details of the study as envisaged by the Commission;
Varstvo podatkov in pomisleki glede biometričnih podatkov
Data protection and biometrics concerns
meni, da je nedopustno, da se Komisija pred sprejetjem prej omenjenega sporočila z naslovom "Priprava naslednjih ukrepov pri upravljanju meja v Evropski uniji" ni posvetovala niti z Evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, ki je že izrazil določeno število zadržkov v zvezi z njim, niti z delovno skupino za varstvo podatkov iz člena 29; zato zahteva, da se Komisija z omenjenima organoma posvetuje glede načrtovanih ukrepov iz tega sporočila, saj predlagani sestavni deli obsegajo obdelavo velike količine osebnih podatkov;
Finds it unacceptable that the Commission failed to consult either the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), who had nonetheless expressed a number of concerns, or the Article 29 Working Party prior to the adoption of the Communication entitled 'Preparing the next steps in border management in the European Union'; requests the Commission, therefore, to consult both in respect of any action to be taken under that Communication, as the proposed building blocks entail the processing of vast amounts of personal data;
se zaveda, da so biometrični podatki teoretično učinkoviti osebni identifikatorji, ker naj bi bile merjene značilnosti specifične za vsakega posameznika; vseeno poudarja, da biometrični podatki niso nikoli popolni in ne vedno natančni; zato opozarja, da bi bilo treba vedno poskrbeti za alternativne postopke in bolje oblikovati profile tveganj;
Is aware that biometrics are theoretically effective personal identifiers because the characteristics measured are thought to be distinctive of each person; however, underlines the fact that the reliability of biometrics is never absolute and that biometrics are not in all cases accurate; therefore points out that fall-back procedures should be provided for at all times and that risk profiles should be better defined;
vztraja na standardnem protokolu za uporabo in izmenjavo biometričnih podatkov in na dogovorih o nadzoru vmesnikov, ki bodo opisovali način uporabe protokola; nadalje meni, da bi za uporabo biometričnih podatkov moral veljati standard kakovosti, da pri sprejemanju ne bi prihajalo do razlik med različnimi sistemi, ki jih bodo uporabljale države članice;
Insists on a standard protocol for the use and exchange of biometric information and interface control agreements to describe how the protocol will be used; is furthermore of the opinion that the use of biometrics should be subject to a quality standard in order to avoid divergences in acceptance between different systems used by Member States;
meni, da je cilj resnično integriranega upravljanja meja v EU upravičen, in se strinja, da je treba nenehno razvijati in krepiti skupno politiko EU o upravljanju meja;
Considers the objective of truly EU-integrated border management to be legitimate and agrees that it is important to continuously develop and strengthen the EU's common policy on border management;
vseeno meni, da se pri upravljanju meja in priseljevanju daljnosežni predlogi kopičijo neverjetno hitro; zato Komisijo poziva, naj razmišlja o tem, ali je logistika na mejah potrebna in kakšni stroški so povezani z njo;
However, is of the opinion that, within the framework of border and immigration management, far-reaching proposals are piling up at an amazing pace; therefore asks the Commission to think in terms of the need for, and the cost of, the border logistics;
19 prav tako obžaluje, da politika upravljanja meja EU temelji na načelu, da je vsak potnik lahko osumljenec in mora zato dokazati svojo dobronamernost; 20.
19 Deplores, moreover, the notion that the EU's border management policy should be founded on the idea that all travellers are potentially suspect and have to prove their good faith; 20.
kritizira dejstvo, da ni niti celovitega osrednjega načrta, kjer bi bili navedeni skupni cilji in struktura strategije upravljanja meja EU, niti podrobnosti o tem, kako naj bi vsi sorodni programi in sheme (obstoječi, v pripravi ali na stopnji razvoja politike) medsebojno delovali in kako bi jih lahko kar najoptimalneje medsebojno povezali; meni, da bi morala Komisija pri oblikovanju strukture strategije upravljanja meja EU naprej preučiti raven učinkovitosti obstoječih sistemov upravljanja meja v državah članicah, da bi med njimi ustvarila največjo možno sinergijo;
Criticises the lack of a comprehensive master plan setting out the overall objectives and architecture of the EU's border management strategy as well as the absence of details showing how all related programmes and schemes (already in place, in the course of preparation or at the stage of policy development) are supposed to function together and how relationships among them can be optimised; takes the view that, when considering the architecture of the EU's border management strategy, the Commission should analyse first of all the effectiveness of the existing border management systems of the Member States, in order to bring about the optimal synergies between them;
poudarja, da sta najprej potrebna pregled in ocena obstoječih sistemov in sistemov v pripravi, in poudarja da je to, ali bo EU dosegla svoje strateške cilje, v veliki meri odvisno od uspešnega upravljanja soodvisnosti med sorodnimi programi, saj bosta podvajanje in neskladnost med njimi posledično negativno vplivala na organizacijsko zmogljivost in rezultate; meni, da je treba pred uvedbo novih instrumentov ali sistemov najprej doseči polno, varno in zanesljivo delovanje obstoječih orodij;
Stresses the need for an evaluation and assessment, first of all, of existing systems and those under preparation, and emphasises that the EU's ability to achieve its strategic goals depends to a great extent on its success in managing the interdependencies among related programmes, as duplication and inconsistency between them will have a negative impact on organisational performance and results as a consequence; is of the opinion that no new instruments or systems should be launched until the existing tools are fully operational, safe and reliable;
meni, da je pred naložbami nujno treba natančno opredeliti operativni kontekst, da bi uskladili vse ukrepe in nastajajoče pobude; poudarja še, da je treba zelo natančno opredeliti, katere spremembe so potrebne in s tem zagotoviti skladno delovanje tehnologije in procesov, ter poudarja, da bi morale biti vse naložbe gospodarsko upravičene;
Is of the opinion that, before any investment is made, it is of the utmost importance to have a clearly defined operational context in which to align all the measures and emerging initiatives; points out, moreover, that it should be crystal clear what modifications are necessary in order to ensure that technology and processes work in harmony, and stresses that all investments should be economically justified;
izraža dvom glede potrebnosti in sorazmernosti predvidenih ukrepov, saj ti prinašajo visoke stroške in lahko ogrozijo zaščito osebnih podatkov, zato meni, da bi jih bilo treba pred vsakršnim uradnim predlogom oceniti z vidika teh meril;
Expresses doubts concerning the need for, and the proportionality of, the proposed measures, given their expense and the potential risks they pose for data protection; is therefore of the opinion that they should be assessed against those criteria before any formal proposal is envisaged;
priznava, da bo iskanje pravega ravnovesja med prostim gibanjem vedno večjega števila ljudi prek meja in večjo varnostjo evropskih državljanov zelo zapleteno, ter ne zanika očitnih prednosti uporabe podatkov; hkrati meni, da je zaupanje javnosti v vladne ukrepe mogoče ohraniti samo, če so glede varstva podatkov zagotovljeni zaščitni ukrepi, nadzor in pritožbeni mehanizmi;
Acknowledges that striking a balance between ensuring the free movement of a growing number of people across borders and ensuring greater security for Europe's citizens is a complex exercise, and does not deny that the use of data offers clear advantages; at the same time, is of the opinion that public trust in government action can only be maintained if provision is made for sufficient data protection safeguards, supervision and redress mechanisms;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov in Evropski agenciji za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske unije (Frontex).
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the European Data Protection Supervisor and the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. marca 2009 s priporočili Komisiji o čezmejnih prenosih sedežev družb ( 2008/2196(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 with recommendations to the Commission on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of a company ( 2008/2196(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 43 in 48 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 43 and 48 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. maja 2003 z naslovom "Posodabljanje prava družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji - načrt za napredek" ( KOM(2003)0284 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 21 May 2003 entitled "Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union – A Plan to Move Forward" ( COM(2003)0284 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu: Posodabljanje prava družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji - načrt za napredek UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 21 April 2004 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Modernising company law and enhancing corporate governance in the European Union – A plan to move forward OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. julija 2006 o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih na področju prava družb UL C 303 E, 13.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 July 2006 on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law OJ C 303 E, 13.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o evropski družbi v zasebni lasti in o štirinajsti direktivi na področju prava družb o prenosu sedeža družbe UL C 263 E, 16.10.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2007 on the European Private Company and the Fourteenth Company Law Directive on the transfer of the company seat OJ C 263 E, 16.10.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča v zadevah
having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice in
Daily Mail in General Trust
Daily Mail and General Trust
Zadeva 81/87
Case 81/87
[1988], Zbirka 5483.
[1988] ECR 5483.
Zadeva C-212/97
Case C-212/97
[1999], Zbirka I-1459.
[1999] ECR I-1459.
Zadeva C-208/00
Case C-208/00
[2002], Zbirka I-9919.
[2002] ECR I-9919.
Zadeva C-167/01
Case C-167/01
[2003], Zbirka I-10155.
[2003] ECR I-10155.
Zadeva C-411/03
Case C-411/03
[2005], Zbirka I-10805
[2005] ECR I-10805.
Zadeva C-196/04
Case C-196/04
[2006], Zbirka I-7995.
[2006] ECR I-7995.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0040/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0040/2009 ),
ker bi morale družbe uživati svobodo ustanavljanja na notranjem trgu, kot je zapisano v Pogodbi ES in kot to razlaga Sodišče,
whereas companies should enjoy freedom of establishment within the internal market as enshrined in the EC Treaty and interpreted by the Court of Justice,
ker je čezmejna selitev družb eden od ključnih elementov pri dokončni vzpostavitvi notranjega trga,
whereas cross-border company migration is one of the crucial elements in the completion of the internal market,
ker čezmejni prenos registriranega sedeža družbe ne bi smel povzročiti prenehanja ali kakršnekoli druge prekinitve oziroma izgube statusa pravne osebe,
whereas a cross-border transfer of the registered office of a company should not give rise to its winding-up or any other interruption or loss of legal personality,
ker se pri čezmejnem prenosu registriranega sedeža ne bi smelo zaobiti pravnih, socialnih in davčnih pogojev,
whereas a cross-border transfer of the registered office should not circumvent legal, social and fiscal conditions,
ker je treba zaščititi pravice drugih zainteresiranih strani, ki jih prenos zadeva, kot so manjšinski delničarji, zaposleni in upniki, itd.,
whereas the rights of other stakeholders concerned by the transfer, such as minority shareholders, employees and creditors, etc, should be safeguarded,
in 2005/56/ES Direktiva 2005/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o čezmejnih združitvah kapitalskih družb (UL L 310, 25.11.2005, str.
and 2005/56/EC Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies (OJ L 310, 25.11.2005, p.
), in ker posledično čezmejni prenos registriranega sedeža ne bi smel pomeniti izgube teh pravic,
) should be fully preserved, and whereas, consequently, the transfer of a registered office should not result in the loss of those existing rights,
ker pravilo, po katerem mora družba ohraniti svojo glavno upravo in registrirani sedež v isti državi članici, nasprotuje sodni praksi Sodišča o svobodi ustanavljanja in zato krši pravo ES,
whereas a rule requiring a company to maintain its head office and its registered office in the same Member State would run counter to the case-law of the Court of Justice on freedom of establishment and would therefore infringe EC law,
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu do 31. marca 2009 na podlagi člena 44 Pogodbe ES predloži zakonodajni predlog direktive, v katerem bodo določeni ukrepi za usklajevanje nacionalnih zakonodaj držav članic, da se znotraj Skupnosti olajša čezmejni prenos registriranega sedeža družb, ustanovljenih v skladu z zakonodajo ene izmed države članice ("štirinajsta direktiva o pravu družb"), in nadalje poziva, naj se predlog pripravi v okviru medinstitucionalnih razprav in v skladu s spodnjimi natančnimi priporočili;
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament by 31 March 2009, on the basis of Article 44 of the EC Treaty, a legislative proposal for a directive laying down measures for coordinating Member States" national legislation in order to facilitate the cross-border transfer within the Community of the registered office of a company formed in accordance with the legislation of a Member State ("14th Company Law Directive"), and requests that the proposal in question be drawn up within the framework of inter-institutional deliberations and following the detailed recommendations set out below;
ugotavlja, da lahko podjetja trenutno svoje sedeže prenesejo le prek razpustitve podjetja in ustanovitve nove pravne osebe v ciljni državi članici ali prek ustanovitve nove pravne osebe v ciljni državi članici ter kasnejše združitve obeh podjetij; nadalje ugotavlja, da je ta postopek povezan z upravnimi ovirami, stroški in socialnimi posledicami ter da ne nudi pravne varnosti,
Notes that undertakings can currently transfer their seat only either by dissolution and the establishment of a new legal entity in the Member State of destination, or by establishing a new legal entity in the Member State of destination and then merging both undertakings; further notes that this procedure involves administrative obstacles, costs and social consequences and offers no legal certainty;
opozarja na svobodo ustanavljanja, ki jo za podjetja zagotavlja člen 48 Pogodbe ES in kot jo razlaga Sodišče Prej omenjena sodba v zadevi
Draws attention to the freedom of establishment that is guaranteed for undertakings under Article 48 of the EC Treaty, as interpreted by the Court of Justice Judgment in