natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vendar obžaluje nejasno predstavitev sklepov v zvezi z evropsko varnostno strategijo in EVOP (štirje dokumenti namesto enega); obžaluje, da je besedilo velikokrat nejasno in ne opisuje prave strategije; izraža kritiko, ker Svet ni izpolnil zahteve Parlamenta o pripravi bele knjige, zaradi česar ni verjetno, da bi se razvila plodna in široka javna razprava;
Deplores, however, the unclear manner in which the conclusions concerning the ESS and ESDP are presented (in four documents instead of one); regrets the often vague wording used, which fails to describe a real strategy; criticises the fact that the Council has not acceded to Parliament's demand for a White Paper and that it is therefore unlikely that a fruitful, wide-ranging public debate will be initiated;
opredelitev skupnih evropskih varnostnih interesov,
the definition of common European security interests,
opredelitev meril za začetek misij EVOP,
the definition of criteria for the launching of ESDP missions,
predlogi za novo partnerstvo med EU in Natom,
proposals for a new EU-NATO partnership,
obravnava nacionalnih ugovorov;
tackling the issue of national "caveats";
obžaluje, da po letu 2003 pri krepitvi obrambnega sodelovanja v EU ni bilo večjega napredka; zato ponovno poziva k pripravi bele knjige o evropski varnosti in obrambi kot orodja za sprožitev široke javne razprave ter da se zagotovi učinkovito izvajanje evropskem varnostne strategije;
Regrets the relative lack of progress since 2003 in strengthening EU cooperation in defence; therefore calls once again for a White Paper to be drawn up on European security and defence as a tool to be used to initiate a wide-ranging public debate and to ensure that the ESS is implemented in an efficient way;
obžaluje, da revizija evropske varnostne strategije – ki je bila sicer temeljito pripravljena, vendar je zaradi zapletov z Lizbonsko pogodbo izgubila svoj zagon – ni prinesla res novih strateških ciljev, ampak je rezultat samo poročilo o sprotnih vprašanjih te politike; ugotavlja, da se je obseg nevarnosti razširil, med drugim na kibernetsko varnost in piratstvo; pozdravlja inovativne vidike v reviziji, na primer njeno osredotočanje na podnebne spremembe, zanesljivo preskrbo z energijo (na področju jedrske energije tudi na podporo jedrskemu gorivnemu ciklusu, ki bi bil predmet večstranskega nadzora, in na večstranski sporazum, s katerim bi prepovedali proizvodnjo cepljivih materialov za jedrsko orožje) in na Mednarodni sporazum o trgovini z orožjem ter druge sporazume o razoroževanju, kot je najnovejša Konvencija iz Osla o prepovedi uporabe kasetnega streliva;
Regrets that, despite extensive preparation but in consequence of a loss of momentum caused by the impasse over the Lisbon Treaty, the revision of the ESS has resulted not in a new strategic orientation but merely in a report expressing day-to-day policy concerns as these arise; notes that the range of threats has been expanded to cover, inter alia, cyber security and piracy; welcomes innovative aspects of the revision such as its focus on climate change, energy security (including, in the nuclear field, support for a multilateral nuclear fuel cycle and a multilateral treaty banning the production of fissile material for nuclear weapons) and the International Arms Trade Treaty as well as other disarmament treaties such as the new Oslo Convention on Cluster Munitions;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da je pred sprejetjem poročila s predlogom za revizijo evropske varnostne strategije potekala le omejena parlamentarna razprava in da javne razprave sploh ni bilo;
Finds it unacceptable that there was only limited parliamentary debate and no public debate before the adoption of the report proposing revision of the ESS;
meni, da nasilno širjenje doslej zamrznjenih sporov v Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji ter poznejše rusko priznanje neodvisnosti teh pokrajin še dodatno poudarjata nujno potrebo po investiranju v trajne politične rešitve teh konfliktov v naši soseščini; ponovno poudarja, da konfliktov na Kavkazu ni mogoče rešiti z vojaškimi sredstvi, in strogo obsoja vse, ki so v času konflikta uporabili nasilje; poudarja, da je v nadaljnji razvoj strateškega partnerstva EU z Rusijo treba vključiti pomemben dialog o varnosti, ki bo temeljil na izraženi zavezi obeh strani skupnim vrednotam, spoštovanju mednarodnega prava in ozemeljske celovitosti ter zavezanosti obveznostim iz Helsinške sklepne listine in njihovemu izpolnjevanju;
Considers that the violent escalation of the hitherto frozen conflicts in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, and the subsequent recognition of the independence of those provinces by Russia, underscores the urgent need to invest in durable political solutions for such conflicts in our neighbourhood; reiterates its view that the conflicts in the Caucasus cannot be resolved by military means and its firm condemnation of all those who resorted to violence during the conflict; emphasises that the further development of the EU's strategic partnership with Russia needs to include meaningful dialogue on security, based on the stated commitment of both parties to their shared values, respect for international law and territorial integrity, and commitment to, and the fulfilment of, obligations under the Helsinki Final Act;
poudarja, da varnostne razsežnosti odnosov med EU in Rusijo ter vloge SZVP in EVOP ni mogoče obravnavati ločeno od širšega evropskega varnostnega ustroja, ki vključuje Nato, Organizacijo za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE) in mednarodne dogovore, kot sta pogodbi o protibalistični raketni zaščiti in o konvencionalnih oboroženih silah v Evropi; meni, da je treba pomembne razvoje v tej širši varnostni strukturi obravnavati v okviru dialoga z Rusijo in Združenimi državami, in poziva Svet, naj se odprto in konstruktivno zavzema za morebitne pogovore med EU, Združenimi državami, Rusijo in državami, ki niso članice EU OVSE, da bi obnovile čezatlansko soglasje o varnosti, in sicer na podlagi Helsinške sklepne listine;
Stresses that the security dimension of EU-Russia relations and the role of the CFSP and the ESDP cannot be seen in isolation from the wider European security architecture, which includes NATO, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and international arrangements such as the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty and the Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe; considers that relevant developments in this wider security structure should be addressed in dialogue with both Russia and the United States, and asks the Council to adopt an open and constructive attitude towards possible talks between the EU, the United States, Russia and non-EU OSCE member states with a view to renewing transatlantic consensus on security, taking the Helsinki Final Act as a basis;
pozdravlja usklajeno ravnanje EU glede posredovanja med Rusijo in Gruzijo kot odziv na izziv, ki ga predstavlja vojna v Gruziji; poudarja, da sta hitri odziv in enotnost EU, ki sta privedla do podpisa sporazuma o prekinitvi ognja, ter hitra napotitev misije za nadzor v okviru EVOP, dokazali njeno sposobnost za krizno upravljanje in skupno ukrepanje; izraža pohvalo nedavnemu francoskemu predsedstvu EU za njegovo pozitivno vlogo pri ohranjanju skupnega evropskega pristopa;
Welcomes the concerted action taken by the EU to mediate between Russia and Georgia in response to the challenge posed by the war in Georgia; points out that the rapid reaction and unity of the European Union, which led to the signing of a ceasefire agreement and the rapid deployment of a monitoring mission under the ESDP, has demonstrated its capacity for crisis management and common action; commends the recent French EU Presidency for its positive role in maintaining a common European approach;
odobrava sklep Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2008, da določi neodvisno komisijo pod vodstvom EU, da preuči vzroke vojne v Gruziji;
Welcomes the Council's decision of 2 December 2008 to establish an independent commission headed by the EU to examine the causes of the conflict in Georgia;
je seznanjen z zaskrbljenostjo, ki so jo izrazile baltske države, in ugotavlja, da je zveza Nato skupaj s svojimi članicami jasno potrdila, da ostajajo njene zaveze iz člena 5 Severnoatlantske pogodbe še naprej veljavne;
Notes the concerns expressed by the Baltic states and takes note of the clear confirmation by NATO and its member states of the continuing validity of their commitments under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je Nato odločil, da ponovno uporabi obstoječe komunikacijske kanale in da bo svet Nato-Rusija ponovno začel z delom;
Welcomes the fact that NATO has decided once again to use existing channels of communication and that the NATO-Russia Council is to be reactivated;
meni, da bi si EU in Nato morala prizadevati za odkrit in stvaren dialog z Rusijo o temah, kot so regionalna varnost, energija, protiraketna obramba, neširjenje orožja za množično uničevanje, zmanjšanje vojaških sil in vesoljska politika;
Considers that both the EU and NATO should pursue a frank and realistic dialogue with Russia covering such matters as regional security, energy, missile defence, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, limitation of armed forces and space policy;
meni, da je bistveno okrepiti večstranski dialog o varnostnih vprašanjih v okviru evro-atlantskega partnerskega sveta;
Considers it important to enhance a multilateral dialogue on security issues within the framework of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council;
opozarja, da je Rusija zaradi svojega geopolitičnega položaja, vojaške sile, politične teže, energetskih bogastev in gospodarskega potenciala za Evropo strateško pomembna;
Points out that, due to its geopolitical position, its military power and political weight, its energy wealth and its economic potential, Russia is of strategic importance for Europe;
Oblikovanje evropskih zmogljivosti
Building Europe's capabilities
poudarja, da EU potrebuje sredstva za izvedbo svojih politik in torej – poleg tega, da mora močno okrepiti svoje diplomatske zmogljivosti – potrebuje civilne in vojaške zmogljivosti, s katerimi bo lahko okrepila evropsko varnostno in obrambno politiko in izpolnila svoje obveznosti v svetu;
Stresses that the EU has to have the means to implement its policies, and that, in addition to strengthening its diplomatic capacities, it therefore needs both civilian and military capabilities in order to strengthen the ESDP and to fulfil its responsibilities in the world;
poudarja, da je bilo v okviru EVOP od njenega začetka izvedenih 22 misij, od tega 16 civilnih; poudarja pomen civilne komponente evropske varnostne in obrambne politike; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja vzpostavitev civilnih zmogljivosti za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij v okviru Sveta Evropske unije; poziva države članice, naj podvojijo svoja prizadevanja, da zagotovijo usposobljeno osebje za civilne misije EVOP; v zvezi s tem poudarja pomen civilnega globalnega cilja za leto 2010;
Points out that, since its creation, 22 missions have been carried out within the framework of the ESDP, including 16 civilian missions; stresses the importance of the civilian components of the ESDP; welcomes in this connection the establishment of the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability within the Council of the European Union; calls on the Member States to redouble their efforts to make qualified personnel available for civilian ESDP missions; stresses in this connection the importance of the civilian headline goal 2010;
poudarja tudi, da se največ pozornosti namenja vojaški razsežnosti EVOP, zaradi česar je napredek na področju civilnih zmogljivosti in preprečevanja konfliktov prepočasen, zato morata Svet in Komisija nujno dati nov zagon na tem področju;
Also emphasises that, with most of the emphasis being placed on the military dimension of the ESDP, progress in the area of civil capabilities and conflict prevention is far too slow and that, in this area, new dynamics need to be proposed as a matter of urgency by both the Council and the Commission;
poziva k nadaljevanju preoblikovanja partnerstva za vzpostavljanje miru v evropske mirovne enote;
Calls for the further development of the Peace-building Partnership into a European Civil Peace Corps;
meni, da bi morala EU svoje zmogljivosti še naprej graditi na podlagi civilnih in vojaških globalnih ciljev; prizadevati bi si morala za oblikovanje sil, v katerih bi bilo stalno razpoložljivih 60 000 vojakov; ponavlja svoj predlog o tem, da bi bil Eurocorps jedro teh sil, ki bi ga po potrebi okrepili z dodatnimi morskimi in zračnimi zmogljivostmi; pozdravlja sporazum med Nemčijo in Francijo o ohranitvi francosko-nemške brigade na skupnih lokacijah; meni tudi, da bi morala EU zagotoviti stalno razpoložljivost ustreznega števila policistov, sodnikov in tožilcev; ugotavlja, da koncept bojnih skupin EU in posebni načrti za morebitne misije očitno ne vodijo k temu, da bi se bojne skupine uporabljale v okviru zunanjih operacij EU, kar povzroča zmedo;
Is of the opinion that the EU should continue to build its capabilities on the basis of the civilian and military headline goals; notes that it should endeavour to make a force of 60 000 soldiers permanently available; reaffirms its proposal that the Eurocorps should be the core of this force, if necessary reinforced by additional maritime and air capacities; welcomes the agreement concluded between Germany and France on maintaining the Franco-German Brigade at joint locations; furthermore, considers that the EU should make an adequate number of police officers, judges and prosecutors permanently available; finds it confusing that the EU Battlegroup concept and specific scenarios for potential missions do not seem to lead to the Battlegroups being used in the EU's external operations;
poudarja, da države članice EU skupaj za obrambo porabijo več kot 200 000 000 000 EUR letno, kar je več kot polovica sredstev, ki jih za obrambo namenjajo ZDA; je še vedno zelo zaskrbljen nad neučinkovito in neusklajeno porabo teh sredstev; zaradi tega poziva k večjim naporom za odpravo nepotrebnega podvajanja med državami članicami, predvsem s specializacijo, združevanjem in delitvijo obstoječih zmogljivosti ter skupnim razvijanjem novih zmogljivosti; izraža pohvalo Evropski obrambni agenciji za odlično opravljeno delo doslej in države članice EU poziva, naj v celoti izkoristijo možnosti, ki jih ponuja agencija;
Points out that the EU Member States together spend more than EUR 200 000 000 000 per year on defence, which is more than half the defence expenditure of the United States; remains deeply concerned about the lack of efficiency and coordination in the utilisation of those funds; therefore urges that greater efforts be made to eliminate unnecessary duplication between Member States, namely through specialisation, pooling and sharing of existing capabilities, and joint development of new ones; commends the European Defence Agency (EDA) for the excellent work it has performed so far and calls on EU Member States to take full advantage of the EDA's potential;
poudarja, da so potrebe glede zmogljivosti pri delovanju oboroženih sil, nadzoru na mejah, zaščiti kritične infrastrukture in kriznem upravljanju pogosto tehnološko zelo podobne ali celo enake; poudarja, da se s tem odpirajo nove priložnosti za izkoristek sinergij in povečanje interoperabilnost med oboroženimi in varnostnimi silami;
Stresses that capability needs are often technologically very similar or even identical for armed forces operations, border surveillance, protection of critical infrastructure and disaster management; emphasises that this creates new opportunities to exploit synergies and enhance interoperability between armed forces and security forces;
odločno poziva, da bi morala EU in njene države članice svoja prizadevanja usmeriti v skupne zmogljivosti, ki se lahko uporabijo za obrambne in varnostne namene; meni, da so pri tem bistvenega pomena satelitsko podprta obveščevalna dejavnost, oprema za nadzor in opozarjanje, zračna plovila brez posadke, helikopterji, telekomunikacijska oprema ter zračni in pomorski promet; zahteva skupni tehnični standard, ki bi veljal za varne telekomunikacije, in možnosti zaščite ključne infrastrukture;
Strongly requests that the EU and its Member States focus their efforts on common capabilities which can be used for both defence and security purposes; in this context, considers satellite-based intelligence, surveillance and warning equipment, unmanned air vehicles, helicopters and telecommunication equipment and air and sea transport to be crucial; demands a common technical standard for protected telecommunications and ways of protecting critical infrastructure;
pozdravlja sklep usmerjevalnega odbora Evropske obrambne agencije z dne 10. novembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi evropske flote za zračni transport ter je seznanjen z izjavo o namenu glede sodelovanja pri tej pobudi, ki so jo podpisali obrambni ministri dvanajstih držav članic EU;
Welcomes the decision taken by the Steering Board of the EDA on 10 November 2008 on the establishment of a European Air Transport Fleet and takes note of the Declaration of Intent on participation in this initiative, signed by the Defence Ministers of twelve EU Member States;
meni, da je za varnostne in obrambne namene treba dovoliti uporabo Galilea in GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment in Security);
Considers it necessary to allow the use of the Galileo and GMES (Global Monitoring for Environment and Security) systems for security and defence purposes;
odobrava nadaljnji dinamični razvoj sodelovanja med nacionalnimi oboroženimi silami, da bi postale čim bolj usklajene; predlaga, da bi ta proces in oborožene sile poimenovali "usklajene oborožene sile Evrope" (SAFE - Synchronised Armed Forces Europe);
Approves the dynamic further development of cooperation between national armed forces so that they become increasingly synchronised; proposes that this process and the armed forces be given the name "SAFE" – Synchronised Armed Forces Europe;
meni, da bi SAFE zagotavljale dovolj manevrskega prostora za nevtralne države članice EU, za članice, ki so v vojaških zavezništvih, in tiste, ki že tesno sodelujejo med seboj, pa tudi tiste, ki se še niso odločile za to; za SAFE predlaga model sodelovanja "opt-in", ki bi temeljil na večji prostovoljni uskladitvi;
Considers that SAFE provides sufficient room for manoeuvre for neutral EU Member States as well as those bound by military alliances, for those which already work closely together and for those which are still reluctant to do so; proposes an opt-in model for the organisation of SAFE based on more intensive voluntary synchronisation;
podpira zamisel o evropskem statutu za vojake v okviru SAFE, ki bi urejal standarde usposabljanja, operativno doktrino in svobodo pri operativnem ukrepanju, vprašanja dolžnosti in pravic, raven kakovosti opreme, zdravstveno oskrbo in socialno varnost v primeru smrti, poškodbe ali nezmožnosti za delo;
Approves the idea of a European statute for soldiers within the framework of SAFE governing training standards, operational doctrine and freedom of operational action, issues relating to duties and rights, as well as the level of equipment quality, medical care and social security arrangements in the event of death, injury or incapacity;
v zvezi s SAFE podpira načelo vseevropske delitve dela v okviru vojaških zmogljivosti;
Approves in respect of SAFE the principle of a Europe-wide division of labour in military capabilities;
se zavzema za tesnejše evropsko sodelovanje pri usposabljanju, vzdrževanju in logistiki kot osnovnih pogojih za večjo učinkovitost pri izdatkih za obrambo;
Advocates closer European cooperation in the area of training, maintenance and logistics as a crucial prerequisite for greater efficiency in defence spending;
meni, da bi bilo treba zmogljivost EU za avtonomno delovanje na področju zunanje in varnostne politike izboljšati s ciljno usmerjenim stopnjevanjem njenih zmogljivosti za analizo, načrtovanje, vodenje in obveščevalno dejavnost; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sklep Evropskega sveta o prizadevanjih za vzpostavitev integrirane civilne in vojaške strukture za strateško načrtovanje za operacije in misije EVOP;
Is of the opinion that the EU's capacity for autonomous foreign and security policy action should be improved through goal-oriented enhancement of its analysis, planning, leadership and intelligence capacities; in this context, welcomes the decision of the European Council to work towards establishing an integrated civilian and military strategic planning structure for ESDP operations and missions;
pozdravlja tudi sklep Evropskega sveta o vzpostavitvi neformalne skupine EU in NATA na visoki ravni, ki bo zadolžena za pragmatično krepitev sodelovanja med obema organizacijama;
Likewise welcomes the decision of the European Council to set up an informal EU-NATO high-level group which will be tasked with strengthening cooperation between the two organisations in a pragmatic manner;
se zavzema za neodvisni in stalni operativni štab EU, ki bo lahko strateško načrtoval in izvajal operacije in misije v okviru evropske varnostne in obrambne politike;
Calls for the setting-up of an autonomous and permanent EU Operational Headquarters with the capacity to undertake strategic planning and to conduct ESDP operations and missions;
podpira zamisel o ustanovitvi sveta ministrov za obrambo kot načina usklajevanja različnih nacionalnih obrambnih politik, s čimer bi se povečali prispevki posameznih držav članic k EVOP; poudarja cilj popolnega parlamentarnega nadzora nad misijami EVOP, tudi s strani Evropskega parlamenta;
Supports the idea of creating a Council of Defence Ministers in order to make the various national defence policies more coherent, thus boosting the respective national contributions to the ESDP; stresses the objective of full parliamentary scrutiny of ESDP missions and operations, including by the European Parliament;
odločno podpira okrepitev evropskega obrambnega in varnostnega trga s sprejetjem zakonodajnega predloga Komisije za javna naročila in prenose znotraj Skupnosti ter predlaga še dodatne pobude za dosego tega cilja, zlasti na področju zanesljive oskrbe in varnosti informacij;
Strongly supports the reinforcement of a European defence and security market by means of adoption of the Commission's legislative proposals for public procurement and intra-Community transfers, and suggests further initiatives to achieve this objective, in particular in the areas of security of supply and security of information;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sprejetje Skupnega stališča Sveta 2008/944/SZVP z dne 8. decembra 2008, ki opredeljuje skupna pravila glede nadzora izvoza vojaške tehnologije in opreme UL L 335, 13.12.2008, str.
Welcomes in this connection the adoption of Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP of 8 December 2008 defining common rules governing control of exports of military technology and equipment OJ L 335, 13.12.2008, p.
, ki spreminja Kodeks ravnanja glede izvoza orožja v pravno zavezujoč instrument; pozdravlja tudi dejstvo, da lahko nacionalne države še naprej individualno sprejemajo strožje ukrepe;
, which transforms the Code of Conduct on Arms Exports into a legally binding instrument; furthermore, welcomes the fact that EU Member States remain free to adopt more stringent measures on an individual basis;
opozarja, da je skupne orožne sisteme treba zagotoviti s pomočjo močne evropske obrambne industrije, ki bo lahko zadostila sedanjim in prihodnjim potrebam evropskih oboroženih sil ter Evropi omogočila samozadostnost in neodvisnost;
Recalls that common weapons systems should be provided through a strong European defence industry which will be capable of satisfying the current and future requirements of the European Armed Force and will enable Europe to become self-sufficient and independent;
se zavzema za povečanje sredstev Skupnosti za varnostne raziskave in za vzpostavitev skupnih raziskovalnih programov, v katerih bi sodelovali Komisija in Evropska obrambna agencija;
Demands an increase in Community funding for security research and the creation of joint research programmes involving the Commission and the EDA;