natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije, da bi leto 2007 razglasili za evropsko leto enakih možnosti za vse, in želi, da bi to prispevalo k ozaveščenosti o različnih vrstah diskriminacije in raznovrstni diskriminaciji ter k boljšemu poznavanju pravnih sredstev; vendar pa želi, da bi v prihodnosti priprave na takšne pobude stekle prej; ponovno poudarja, da morajo Komisija in države članice poskrbeti za enoten odziv na različne oblike diskriminacije, pri čemer želi Komisijo spomniti na obljubo in obvezo, da bo vprašanje pozorno spremljala in o njem poročala Parlamentu; ponovno izraža obžalovanje nad dejstvom, da so glede na pomen boja proti diskriminaciji sredstva, namenjena za leto enakih možnosti za vse, nezadostna; ker pa v medkulturni dialog spada tudi boj proti diskriminaciji, se zavzema, da bi se v času evropskega leta medkulturnega dialoga (2008) nadaljevalo z akcijami, ki so se začele leta 2007;
Welcomes the Commission initiative to launch a European Year of Equal Opportunities in 2007 and hopes that this will help to raise awareness of the various forms of discrimination and of multiple discrimination and enable the means of redress to become better known; would nevertheless hope that preparations for such initiatives will in future begin at an earlier stage; reiterates its position that the Commission and Member States must ensure that all forms of discrimination are addressed and dealt with equally and reminds the Commission of its promise and commitment to monitor this matter closely and to report to Parliament; continues to regret the fact that inadequate funds were allocated to the Year in view of the importance of the fight against discrimination; since one of the aims of intercultural dialogue is to combat discrimination, calls for the European Year of Intercultural Dialogue (2008) to continue the measures initiated in connection with 2007;
poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja izobraževanje, ki vzgaja k miru in nenasilju, pa tudi pedagoški pristop, ki temelji na medkulturnem dialogu;
Calls on the Commission to promote education that fosters peace and non-violence and intercultural dialogue pedagogy;
meni, da države članice z ničemer niso omejene pri tem, da po končanem zbiranju podatkov sprejmejo ukrepe v interesu posebnih skupin prebivalcev, ki niso zajete v okviru člena 13 Pogodbe ES in za katere obstaja velika nevarnost, da pristanejo na družbenem robu, kot so denimo osebe, ki so se oziroma se še vedno zdravijo od odvisnosti, ali nekdanji zaporniki, torej osebe, ki se skušajo ponovno vključiti v družbo;
Considers that, after collecting data, the Member States are not prevented from taking measures in the interest of particular groups not covered by Article 13 of the EC Treaty who belong to categories at high risk of social marginalisation, such as individuals in the process of recovery from substance addiction, recovered addicts and former prisoners, i.e. individuals who are in the process of social reintegration;
obžaluje dejstvo, da Listina o temeljnih pravicah še vedno ni pravno zavezujoča, zato zahteva, da se to spremeni; vztraja, da si mora Komisija pri sistematičnem in strogem nadzoru skladnosti svojih zakonodajnih dokumentov in predpisov z Listino o temeljnih pravicah še posebej prizadevati za odkrivanje vseh oblik neposredne in zlasti posredne diskriminacije različnih kategorij oseb, do katere bi lahko zakoni in predpisi privedli; meni, da bi morala Komisija izvesti oceno vpliva diskriminacije za vsak zakonodajni predlog, da bi tako zagotovila dosledno politiko vseh svojih generalnih direktoratov; meni, da mora Agencija za temeljne pravice tesno sodelovati pri študijah o vplivu, ki se izvajajo v tem okviru;
Deplores the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights has not yet been made legally binding, and requests that this situation be remedied; is insistent that when the Commission performs the stringent, systematic checks which it has undertaken to carry out in order to ensure that its legislative and regulatory acts are compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights, it should make a particular effort to detect any form of discrimination (either direct or in particular indirect) which various categories of individual could suffer as a result of such acts; considers that the Commission should carry out a discrimination impact assessment on every legislative proposal to ensure policy consistency across the Commission DGs; thinks that the Agency for Fundamental Rights should be closely involved in the impact studies carried out in this connection;
ocenjuje, tako kot Komisija, da bi se lahko izkazalo, da je za odpravljanje očitnih neenakosti, ki so opredeljene kot "endemične", "strukturne", celo "kulturne", in torej za ponovno vzpostavljanje resno ogroženega ravnotežja v nekaterih primerih nujno začasno odstopanje od pojmovanja enakosti, ki je osredotočeno na posameznika, v korist "razdeljevalne pravičnosti", osredotočene na skupino, in sicer s sprejetjem t. i. "pozitivnih" ukrepov;
Considers – as does the Commission – that if blatant inequalities of an "endemic", "structural or even "cultural' nature are to be remedied and a seriously compromised balance is thus to be restored, it may be necessary in certain cases for a temporary exception to be made to the concept of equality based on the individual in favour of group-based "distributive justice" through the adoption of "positive" measures;
poudarja, da pojmi "pozitivni ukrep", "pozitivna enakost" ali "razdeljevalna pravičnost" zajemajo isto stvarnost, ki izhaja iz priznavanja, da v nekaterih primerih učinkovit boj proti diskriminaciji predpostavlja dejavno posredovanje organov za ponovno vzpostavitev resno ogroženega ravnotežja; vztraja pri dejstvu, da ta vrsta posredovanja ne sme postati ena od oblik diskriminacije, tudi če je "pozitivna", in da pojma pozitivnega ukrepa ne moremo poenostaviti na zamisel o kvoti; opozarja, da se lahko ti ukrepi dejansko uresničijo v zelo različnih oblikah, kot so zagotavljanje zaposlitvenih razgovorov, prednostni dostop do usposabljanj za poklice, v katerih so nekatere kategorije premalo zastopane, prednostno razširjanje ponudbe dela v nekaterih skupnostih ali večje upoštevanje delovnih izkušenj in ne le diplom;
Points out that the concepts of "positive action", "affirmative equality" and "distributive justice" reflect one and the same reality, the basis of which is an acknowledgement of the fact that in certain cases, effective action to combat discrimination requires active intervention by the authorities for the purpose of restoring a seriously compromised balance; stresses that intervention of this kind must not be regarded as a form of discrimination (not even as a "positive" form) and that the concept of positive action cannot be reduced to the idea of a quota; points out that such actions may in practice take the most varied forms, such as a guarantee of recruitment interviews, priority access to certain types of training leading to jobs in which certain categories of people are under-represented, priority notification of job vacancies to certain communities and the taking into account of work experience rather than qualifications alone;
se zaveda, da ima lahko nizek odstotek zastopanosti nekaterih skupin v določenih kategorijah delovnih mest neželen učinek, saj pripadnike teh skupin odvrača od prizadevanj, da bi pridobili potrebno znanje za dostop do delovnih mest, kar vodi v začaran krog; zato priporoča, da delovna skupina na visoki ravni za vprašanje narodnostnih manjšin na trgu dela, ki mora pripraviti poročilo do konca 2006, omenjenemu problemu posveti posebno pozornost; nadalje priporoča, da se vzpostavijo pogoji, ki bodo vsem skupinam oseb omogočili dostop do vseh vrst in ravni izobraževanja in usposabljanja, ne glede na njihovo starost in od otroštva dalje, po potrebi s sprejetjem pozitivnih ukrepov, ki bi prikrajšanim skupinam omogočili šolanje vse do univerze in poklicno usposabljanje, brez katerih bi jim ta vrata ostala zaprta;
Is aware that the fact that certain groups are very poorly represented in certain categories of job may have the perverse effect of discouraging those groups from endeavouring to acquire the knowledge which they need in order to gain access to the jobs concerned, which leads to a vicious circle; strongly recommends, therefore, that the high level working group on ethnic minorities in the labour market, which is due to report at the end of 2006, pay close attention to this issue and that conditions be created which will enable all categories of individual to gain access to all types and levels of education and training, at all ages, starting from childhood, if necessary through the adoption of positive measures designed to enable disadvantaged groups to follow courses of study at school or university or to undertake training courses which would not otherwise be accessible to them;
poziva države članice, ki tega še niso storile, da na nacionalni ravni ustanovijo poseben upravni organ za vprašanja enakosti in boja proti diskriminaciji; vztraja, da mora biti organ neodvisen in da mora razpolagati z ustreznimi sredstvi, ki mu bodo omogočala, da žrtvam diskriminacije pomaga pri sodnih postopkih; meni, da mora biti organu dodeljena tudi pravica do vodenja preiskav v zvezi s posredovanimi primeri; meni, da je treba vsako omejevanje pristojnosti tem organov obravnavati kot nepravilno izvajanje protidiskriminacijskih direktiv; poziva Komisijo, da v zvezi s tem natančno oceni položaj v državah članicah in zlasti odločitev poljske vlade, da ukine Urad pooblaščenca za enak položaj, institucijo, zadolženo za boj proti diskriminaciji in spodbujanje enakosti za vse, kot je poudarjeno v poročilu mreže neodvisnih strokovnjakov EU za človekove pravice za leto 2005;
Calls on those Member States which do not already have such bodies to set up, at national level, a specialised administrative body for equality and the fight against discrimination; stresses that such bodies should be independent and should receive the necessary resources to enable them to help victims of discrimination in their dealings with courts and tribunals; considers that they should also have powers to investigate the cases referred to them; considers that any downgrading of such bodies should be considered as an incorrect implementation of the anti-discrimination directives; asks the Commission carefully to evaluate the situation in Member States in this regard, and notably the Polish government's decision to abolish the Office of Plenipotentiary for Equal Status, the institution charged with combating discrimination and promoting equality for all, as pointed out in the 2005 report of the EU Network of independent experts on fundamental rights;
Zbiranje statističnih podatkov
Collection of data
ocenjuje, da Direktiva 95/46/ES ne ovira zbiranja podatkov, zlasti tistih v zvezi z etnično pripadnostjo in religijo, ampak omogoča nujno in priporočljivo zaščito pred vsemi oblikami zlorab pri uporabi občutljivih podatkov, zabeleženih v statistične namene;
Considers that far from constituting an obstacle to the collection of data relating in particular to ethnic origin and to religion, Directive 95/46/EC provides necessary and desirable protection against any abuse of sensitive data collected for statistical purposes;
meni, da je ne glede na kulturne, zgodovinske ali ustavne vidike zbiranje podatkov o položaju narodnostnih manjšin in zapostavljenih skupinah bistvenega pomena in da morajo politični ukrepi in predpisi za odpravljanje diskriminacije temeljiti na točnih podatkih;
Considers that, notwithstanding cultural, historical or constitutional considerations, data collection on the situation of minorities and disadvantaged groups is critical and that policy and legislation to combat discrimination must be based on accurate data;
meni, da bi bilo koristno, če bi delovna skupina, ustanovljena v skladu s členom 29 Direktive 95/46/ES, oblikovala mnenje, s katerim bi pojasnili določbe te direktive, ki bi lahko ovirale oblikovanje statističnih podatkov o nekaterih kategorijah oseb, ter zagotovili enotno razlago te direktive v vseh državah članicah;
Considers that the Article 29 Working Party set up pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC could usefully issue an opinion designed to clarify the provisions of the Directive which may hinder the collection of statistics relating to certain categories of individual and thus to ensure that those provisions are interpreted uniformly throughout the Member States;
opozarja na dejstvo, da se informacije, vsebovane v statističnih podatkih, v katerih so osebni podatki postali anonimni, ne morejo več šteti za osebne podatke; opozarja, da obstajajo tudi zanesljive tehnike, ki spoštujejo anonimnost in se tradicionalno uporabljajo v družbenih vedah ter ki bi morale omogočiti oblikovanje statističnih podatkov na temelju razumnih meril;
Draws attention to the fact that once personal data have been rendered anonymous for statistical purposes, the information contained in the statistics is no longer to be regarded as personal data; points out that there are also reliable techniques which enable anonymity to be observed and are traditionally used in the social sciences and which should enable statistics based on criteria deemed sensitive to be established;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da namerava Komisija v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi organi in drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi oblikovati statistična orodja, namenjena ocenjevanju posledic diskriminacije; z zanimanjem pričakuje objavo priročnika o zbiranju podatkov, ki je predvidena za leto 2006;
Notes with satisfaction that the Commission intends to create (in cooperation with the Member States" authorities and other parties involved) statistics tools designed to assess the impact of discrimination; awaits with interest the publication of the data-collection handbook which is scheduled for 2006;
opozarja, da je pojem posredne diskriminacije tesno povezan s količinskimi merili in je torej neproduktivno ovirati oblikovanje statističnih podatkov o določenih značilnostih s sklicevanjem na zakonodajo o varstvu osebnih podatkov, saj sicer ne bi bilo mogoče dokazati obstoja posredne diskriminacije;
Points out that the concept of indirect discrimination is intrinsically linked to quantitative criteria and that it is therefore counter-productive to prevent statistics relating to certain characteristics from being gathered under the cover of legislation on the protection of personal data, since in the absence of such data the existence of indirect discrimination becomes impossible to prove;
ocenjuje, da je za učinkovit boj proti vsem oblikam posredne diskriminacije in za pravilen prenos direktiv Skupnosti na področju diskriminacije, ki izrecno prepovedujejo takšne oblike diskriminacije, bistvenega pomena omogočiti dokaze, ki temeljijo na statističnih podatkih;
Considers that if effective action is to be taken against all forms of indirect discrimination and if the Community directives on discrimination under which those forms are specifically prohibited are to be correctly transposed, it is essential that authorisation be granted for the supply of proof based on statistics;
poziva države članice in, kjer je to primerno, regionalne in lokalne oblasti, k razvoju lastnih statističnih orodij, da bodo razpolagala s podatki o zaposlitvi, stanovanjskih razmerah, izobraževanju in dohodkih vsake od skupin oseb, ki se srečujejo z diskriminacijo na podlagi enega od meril, navedenih v členu 13 Pogodbe ES;
Calls upon the Member States and, where appropriate, regional and local authorities to develop their statistics tools with a view to ensuring that data relating to employment, housing, education and income are available for each of the categories of individual which are likely to suffer discrimination based on one of the criteria listed in Article 13 of the EC Treaty;
opozarja na dejstvo, da mora oseba, da bi lahko bila prednostno obravnavana zaradi svoje pripadnosti zaščiteni skupini, biti najprej opredeljena kot takšna, kar pomeni, da morajo biti o njej na voljo občutljivi podatki; opozarja, da je treba te podatke obravnavati zlasti v skladu z zakonodajo o varstvu osebnih podatkov in členom 3(1) Okvirne konvencije za varstvo narodnih manjšin;
Draws attention to the fact that if an individual is to benefit from preferential treatment by virtue of his membership of a protected group, it must be possible for him to be identified as such, which means that sensitive data relating to him must be available; points out that such data must be processed in accordance with – in particular – the legislation relating to the protection of personal data and with Article 3(1) of the Framework Convention for the protection of national minorities;
močno obžaluje, da Komisija kljub večkrat izraženim zahtevam Evropskega parlamenta trenutno ne načrtuje oblikovanja celovite zakonodaje na področju boja proti diskriminaciji; opozarja, da boljša zakonodaja ne pomeni zgolj črtanja nepotrebnih predpisov, ampak tudi oblikovanje zakonodaje ob upoštevanju močnih političnih signalov, ki jih pošilja Evropski parlament; zahteva, da se najkasneje do sredine 2007 predstavi nov zakonodajni instrument, ki bo v celoti povzel razloge za diskriminacijo, navedene v členu 13 pogodbe ES, in bo imel enako področje uporabe kot Direktiva 2000/43/ES;
Greatly regrets the fact that, notwithstanding repeated requests by the European Parliament, the Commission is not planning at this stage to draw up comprehensive legislation to combat discrimination; recalls that better legislation does not only mean eliminating unnecessary legislation, but also developing legislation in response to strong political signals from the European Parliament; insists that a new legislative tool incorporating all the grounds for discrimination set out in Article 13 of the EC Treaty and having the same scope as Directive 2000/43/EC be submitted before mid-2007;
države članice poziva, da v svoji zakonodajni praksi ustrezno upoštevajo različne razloge za diskriminacijo, povzete v členu 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, da bi Listini tako omogočili verodostojnost, ki je sicer oslabljena zaradi njenega pravno nezavezujočega značaja;
Calls upon the Member States to take due account in their legislative practice of the various grounds for discrimination set out in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights with a view to bestowing a credibility upon the Charter which has hitherto been weakened by the fact that it is not legally binding;
spodbuja države članice, da brez pridržkov ali omejevalnih izjav prevzamejo obveznosti iz pogodb o človekovih pravicah na področju nediskriminacije in zaščite oseb, ki pripadajo manjšinam in drugim prikrajšanim skupinam, ter jih v dobri veri spoštujejo;
Encourages Member States to undertake obligations without any reservations or restrictive declarations under human rights treaties in the field of non-discrimination and protection of persons belonging to minorities and other vulnerable groups, and to honour such obligations in good faith;
meni, da tradicionalne narodnostne manjšine nujno potrebujejo pravni okvir, če naj učinkovito sodelujejo pri sprejemanju odločitev, povezanih z njihovo identiteto; ščititi jih morajo različne oblike samouprave ali avtonomije, da bi na ta način presegli dvojna merila, ki so na eni strani posledica kopenhagenskih meril in na drugi dejstva, da v državah članicah ni nobenih tovrstnih predpisov;
Considers that traditional national minorities urgently need a framework policy standard for their effective participation in decision-making processes concerning their identity, and need to be protected by various forms of self-government or autonomy to overcome the double standards established by the Copenhagen criteria on the one hand and the lack of any rules in the Member States on the other;
od Komisije zahteva, da se med naslednjo prenovo protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje še zlasti osredotoči na problematiko raznovrstne diskriminacije in ločevanja, ki bi ga lahko primerjali z določeno obliko diskriminacije, ter ponovno preuči pojem posredne diskriminacije z izrecnim priznavanjem dokazov, ki temeljijo na statističnih podatkih o diskriminaciji;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure that when anti-discrimination law is next recast, it pays particular attention to the problems of multiple discrimination and those of segregation (which constitutes a form of discrimination) and reviews the concept of indirect discrimination by explicitly authorising proof based on statistics relating to discrimination;
vztraja, da mora nova Agencija za temeljne pravice, ki naj bi pričela delovati 2007, tesno sodelovati pri novih okvirnih ukrepih proti diskriminaciji in da oblikovalcem politike EU zagotavlja pravočasne, tehtne, zanesljive, celovite in ustrezne informacije, ki bodo lahko služile pri razvoju nadaljnjih političnih ukrepov in predpisov; zaradi pomislekov o vlogi in delovanju Agencije meni, da mora Agencija tvorno in celovito sodelovati pri oblikovanju protidiskriminacijske politike EU;
Urges that the new Agency for Fundamental Rights, which is due to be operational in 2007, be closely involved in the new framework for anti-discrimination and that it provide EU policy makers with timely, sound, reliable, comprehensive and relevant information from which further policy and legislation can be developed; considers that, in light of the concerns about its role and function, it is essential for the Agency to feed into and play an integral role in supporting EU anti-discrimination policy;
poziva Svet, da sprejme predlog Komisije za Okvirni sklep Sveta o boju proti rasizmu in ksenofobiji UL C 75 E, 26.3.2002, str.
Calls on the Council to adopt the Commission's proposal for a Council framework decision on combating racism and xenophobia OJ C 75 E, 26.3.2002, p.
, ki opredeljuje oblikovanje okvira za kaznovanje rasističnega in ksenofobičnega nasilja kot kaznivega dejanja, saj bi ta sklep prispeval k povečanju zbiranja potrebnih podatkov o rasističnem nasilju in kaznivih dejanjih v EU; meni, da ta okvirni sklep izrecno obravnava homofobijo, antisemitizem, islamofobijo in druge vrste fobij ali sovraštva na osnovi etnične pripadnosti, rase, spolne usmeritve, religije ali iz drugih iracionalnih razlogov;
, which sets out to establish a framework for punishing racist and xenophobic violence as a criminal offence, as that decision would contribute to the enhancement of necessary data collection on racist violence and crime across the EU; believes that the framework decision should explicitly deal with homophobia, anti-semitism, islamophobia, and other types of phobia or hatred based on ethnicity, race, sexual orientation, religion or other irrational grounds;
poziva Komisijo, da pripravi predloge za prepoved diskriminacije, s katero se v vsakdanjem življenju srečujejo istospolni pari (poročeni ali živeči v izvenzakonski skupnosti), še zlasti ko uveljavljajo pravico do prostega gibanja, ki ima v zakonodaji EU zelo pomembno mesto; zahteva, da se tudi na tem področju uporablja načelo vzajemnega priznavanja;
Urges the Commission to bring forward proposals to prohibit the discrimination that same-sex couples - either married or in a registered partnership - suffer in their daily lives, notably when they exercise the right to free movement enshrined in EU law; requests that the principle of mutual recognition be applied also in this field;
naroči svojemu predsednika, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
B6-0343 , 0345 , 0346 , 0347 in 0348/2006
B6-0343 , 0345 , 0346 , 0347 and 0348/2006
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o pristopu k Evropski uniji, ki sta jo Bolgarija in Romunija podpisali dne 25. aprila 2005,
having regard to the Treaty of Accession to the European Union signed by Bulgaria and Romania on 25 April 2005,
ker je skupen in javno izražen cilj EU pristop Bolgarije in Romunije 1. januarja 2007,
whereas it is the common and declared objective of the EU for the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to take place on 1 January 2007,