natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ter izboljšanju konkurenčnosti
boosting competitiveness, and is consequently
Sklepi sporočila Komisije z dne 17. marca 2010 z naslovom „Dvoletno poročilo o posebnem okviru pomoči tradicionalnim dobaviteljicam banan iz vrst držav AKP“ kažejo, da so pretekli programi pomoči pomembno prispevali k doseganju boljše sposobnosti za uspešno diverzifikacijo gospodarstva, čeprav celotnega učinka še ni mogoče količinsko opredeliti, in da trajnost izvoza banan iz držav AKP ostaja negotova.
The conclusions of the Commission Communication of 17 March 2010 entitled ‘Biennial Report on the Special Framework of Assistance for Traditional ACP Suppliers of Bananas’ indicate that past assistance programmes made substantial contributions to achieving improved capacity for successful economic diversification, although the full impact cannot be quantified, and that the sustainability of ACP banana exports remains fragile.
Komisija je opravila oceno programa SFA in ni opravila ocene učinka spremljevalnih ukrepov v sektorju banan (BAM).
The Commission has carried out an evaluation of the SFA programme and has not carried out an impact assessment of the banana accompanying measures (BAMs).
Komisija bi morala zagotoviti učinkovito usklajevanje tega programa z regionalnimi in nacionalnimi indikativnimi programi, ki se izvajajo v državah upravičenkah, zlasti v zvezi z uresničevanjem ciljev na gospodarskem, kmetijskem, socialnem in okoljskem področju.
The Commission should ensure proper coordination of this programme with the regional and national indicative programmes operating in the beneficiary countries, in particular as regards the achievement of economic, agricultural, social and environmental objectives.
Skoraj 2 % svetovne trgovine z bananami ima potrdilo organizacij proizvajalcev pravične trgovine.
Almost 2 % of the world's trade in bananas is endorsed by fair trade producers' organisations.
Minimalne cene pravične trgovine so določene na podlagi izračuna „trajnostnih stroškov proizvodnje“, določenih po posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi, da bi vključili stroške izpolnjevanja dostojnih družbenih in okoljskih standardov ter ustvarili primeren dobiček, ki proizvajalcem omogoča naložbe v dolgoročno stabilnost njihove dejavnosti.
The minimum fair trade prices are set on the basis of a calculation of the ‘sustainable production costs’, established following consultations with stakeholders, with a view to internalising the costs of meeting decent social and environmental standards and generating a reasonable profit, enabling producers to safeguard their livelihoods in the long term.
Da bi preprečili izkoriščanje lokalnih delavcev, bi morali akterji v proizvodni verigi sektorja banan doseči sporazum o pravični razdelitvi prihodkov, ustvarjenih v sektorju.
To prevent the exploitation of local workers, actors in the production chain in the banana industry should agree to ensure that the revenue generated by the industry is allocated fairly.
Komisijo bi bilo treba pooblastiti, da sprejme delegirane akte v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi z geografskimi strateškimi dokumenti, večletnimi okvirnimi programi in strateškimi dokumenti za tematske programe in spremljevalne ukrepe, saj ti dokumenti dopolnjujejo Uredbo (ES) št. 1905/2006 in se splošno uporabljajo.
The Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union in respect of Geographic Strategy Papers, Multi-annual Indicative Programmes and Strategy Papers for thematic programmes and the accompanying measures, as they supplement Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 and are of general application.
Uredbo (ES) št. 1905/2006 bi bilo zato treba spremeniti –
Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,
člen 4 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 4 is replaced by the following:
Izvajanje pomoči Unije
Implementation of Union assistance
Pomoč Unije se v skladu s splošnim namenom in področjem uporabe, cilji in splošnimi načeli te uredbe izvaja v okviru geografskih in tematskih programov, kakor so določeni v členih 5 do 16, in programov, določenih v členih 17 in 17a.
Consistent with the overall purpose and scope, objectives and general principles of this Regulation, Union assistance shall be implemented through the geographic and thematic programmes set out in Articles 5 to 16 and the programmes set out in Articles 17 and 17a.
Države AKP, ki so glavne dobaviteljice banan
Main ACP banana supplying countries
Cilj pomoči Unije tem državam je podpora procesu ▌liberalizacije trga Unije za banane v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
Union assistance shall aim at supporting their adjustment process following ▌liberalisation of the Union market for bananas in the framework of the World Trade Organisation.
Pomoč Unije se uporablja zlasti za boj proti revščini z dejanskim izboljševanjem življenjskih standardov in razmer kmetov, zadevnih oseb in, kjer je ustrezno, malih subjektov, vključno s spoštovanjem delovnih in varnostnih standardov ter spoštovanjem okoljskih standardov, vključno s tistimi glede uporabe pesticidov in izpostavljenosti pesticidom.
Union assistance shall in particular be used to combat poverty by improving the living standards and conditions of farmers and persons concerned, where relevant small entities, including by means of compliance with labour and safety standards, as well as with environmental standards, including the use of and exposure to pesticides.
V okviru pomoči Unije se upoštevajo politike in strategije prilagajanja držav
Union assistance shall take into account the countries' policies and adaptation strategies
ter njihovo regionalno okolje (bližina najbolj oddaljenih regij Unije ter čezmorskih držav in ozemelj)
, as well as their regional environment (in terms of proximity to outermost regions of the Union and overseas countries and territories)
, posebna pozornost pa je namenjena naslednjim področjem sodelovanja:
and shall pay specific attention to the following areas of cooperation:
izboljšanju konkurenčnosti sektorja izvoza banan, če je to trajnostni proces, ob upoštevanju položaja različnih interesnih skupin v sektorju;
enhancing the competitiveness of the banana export sector, where this is sustainable, taking into account the situation of different stakeholders in the chain;
spodbujanju diverzifikacije gospodarstva na območjih, ki so odvisna od izvoza banan
promoting the economic diversification of banana-dependent areas
, v primeru da je takšna strategija izvedljiva
, where such a strategy is viable
spopadanju s širšimi posledicami, ki jih povzroča proces prilagajanja, po možnosti, vendar ne izključno, povezanimi s službami za zaposlovanje in socialno varstvo, rabo zemljišč in obnovo okolja ter makroekonomsko stabilnostjo.
addressing broader impacts generated by the adaptation process, possibly related but not restricted to employment and social services, land use and environmental restoration, and macroeconomic stability.
pomen izvoza banan za gospodarstvo zadevne države AKP in
the importance of banana exports to the economy in the ACP country concerned,
razvoja države.
country's level of development.
Določitev meril za dodeljevanje temelji na
The measurement of the allocation criteria shall be based on
podatkih iz let pred letom
data preceding
2010 in obsegajo obdobje, ki ne sme biti daljše od petih let, ter na študiji Komisije o oceni učinka sporazuma, sklenjenega v okviru STO, ter dvostranskih ali regionalnih sporazumov, ki so sklenjeni ali so v postopku sklenitve med Unijo ter državami Latinske in Srednje Amerike, najpomembnejšimi izvoznicami banan, na države AKP
2010 and covering a period not longer than five years, and on a Commission study assessing the impact on the ACP countries of the agreement reached within the WTO and the bilateral and regional agreements concluded, or in the process of being concluded, between the Union and Latin American countries, which are the leading exporters of bananas
za spremljevalne ukrepe v sektorju banan vključujejo:
for banana accompanying measures shall include:
posodobljen okoljski profil, ki posebno pozornost namenja sektorju banan zadevne države in se med drugim osredotoča na pesticide;
an updated environmental profile paying due attention to the country's banana sector, inter alia focusing on pesticides;
informacije o dosežkih preteklih programov pomoči za banane;
information on the achievements of past banana support programmes;
kazalnike za oceno napredka glede na pogoje izplačevanja, če se kot oblika financiranja izbere proračunska podpora;
indicators to assess progress in relation to disbursement conditions, when budget support will be chosen as the form of financing;
pričakovane rezultate pomoči;
the expected results of the assistance;
časovni razpored podpornih dejavnosti in pričakovanih izplačil za vsako državo prejemnico;
a time schedule of support activities and of expected disbursements for each recipient country;
načine doseganja in spremljanja napredka pri spoštovanju mednarodno dogovorjenih delovnih standardov Mednarodne organizacije dela ter ustreznih konvencij na področju varnosti in zdravja pri delu ter ustreznih mednarodno dogovorjenih temeljnih okoljskih standardov;
the ways in which progress will be achieved and monitored in meeting internationally agreed ILO core labour standards and appropriate occupational safety and health conventions as well as relevant internationally agreed core environmental standards.
Strateške dokumente in večletne okvirne programe iz členov 19 in 20 ter njihove morebitne preglede, navedene v členu 19(2) in členu 20(1), kakor tudi spremljevalne ukrepe iz člena 17 in člena 17a sprejme Komisija
Strategy papers and multi-annual indicative programmes referred to in Articles 19 and 20, and any reviews thereof referred to in Article 19(2) and Article 20(1), as well as accompanying measures referred to in Articles 17 and 17a respectively, shall be adopted by the Commission
z delegiranimi akti,
by means of delegated acts
členom 35 in pod pogoji, določenimi v členih 35a in 35b
Article 35, and subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 35a and 35b
V členu 22 se odstavek 3 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 22(3) is replaced by the following:
V členu 23 se odstavka 3 in 4 nadomestita z naslednjim:
In Article 23, paragraphs 3 and 4 are replaced by the following:
Kadar stroški takšnih ukrepov presežejo 10 000 000 EUR, jih Komisija sprejme ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta.
Where the cost of such measures exceeds EUR 10 million, the Commission shall adopt them taking into account the opinions of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Če so stroški posebnih ukrepov pod 10 000 000 EUR, Komisija ukrepe v roku enega meseca po sprejetju sklepa predloži v informacijo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
For special measures below EUR 10 million, the Commission shall send the measures to the European Parliament and to the Council for information within one month of adopting its decision.
Spremembe posebnih ukrepov, kot so tehnične prilagoditve, podaljšanje obdobja izvajanja, prerazporeditev sredstev znotraj predvidenega proračuna ali zvišanje oz. znižanje proračuna za manj kot 20 % začetnega proračuna, če takšne spremembe ne vplivajo na začetne cilje, določene v sklepu Komisije, se v roku enega meseca sporočijo Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
Amendments to special measures, such as those making technical adjustments, extending the implementation period, reassigning funds within the forecast budget, or increasing or reducing the size of the budget by less than 20 % of the initial budget, provided these amendments do not affect the initial objectives set out in the Commission decision shall be communicated within one month to the European Parliament and to the Council.
V členu 25 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 25(2) is replaced by the following:
V členu 29 se odstavek 1 nadomesti z naslednjim: 1.
Article 29(1) is replaced by the following: 1.
‚Proračunske obveznosti se izvajajo na podlagi sklepov, ki jih Komisija sprejme v skladu s členi 17a(3), 22(1), 23(1) in 26(1).‘
Budget commitments shall be made on the basis of decisions taken by the Commission in accordance with Articles 17a(3), 22(1), 23(1) and 26(1).“;
V členu 31(1) se tretji pododstavek nadomesti z naslednjim:
In Article 31(1), the third subparagraph is replaced by the following:
Postopkov dodeljevanja javnih naročil ali pogodb o donacijah, financiranih v okviru tematskega programa, kakor je določen v členih 11 do 16, ter programih iz členov 17 in 17a, se lahko poleg fizičnih in pravnih oseb, ki so že upravičene na podlagi tematskega programa ali programov iz členov 17 in 17a, udeležijo vse fizične osebe, ki so državljani držav v razvoju, kakor so opredeljene na seznamu OECD/DAC in v Prilogi II, ter pravne osebe s sedežem v teh državah.
Participation in the award of procurement or grant contracts financed under a thematic programme as defined in Articles 11 to 16, and the programmes set out in Articles 17 and 17a, shall be open to all natural persons who are nationals of, or legal persons who are established in, a developing country, as specified by the OECD/DAC and in Annex II, in addition to natural or legal persons eligible by virtue of the thematic programme or the programmes set out in Articles 17 and 17a.
Komisija objavi in posodablja Prilogo II v skladu z rednimi pregledi seznama prejemnikov pomoči s strani OECD/DAC in o tem obvešča Svet.
The Commission shall publish and update Annex II in accordance with regular reviews of the list of aid recipients of the OECD/DAC, and inform the Council thereof.
V členu 33 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 33(2) is replaced by the following:
Člen 35 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
Article 35 is replaced by the following:
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov iz člena 17(2) ter členov 17a in 21 se prenese na Komisijo za obdobje uporabe te uredbe.
The power to adopt the delegated acts referred to in Article 17(2) and Articles 17a and 21 shall be conferred on the Commission for the period of application of this Regulation.
Pooblastilo za sprejemanje delegiranih aktov je prenešeno na Komisijo pod pogoji, določenimi v členih 35a in 35b.
The power to adopt delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid down in Articles 35a and 35b.
Pooblastilo iz člena 17(2) ter členov 17a in 21 lahko kadar koli prekliče Evropski parlament ali Svet.
The delegation of power referred to in Article 17(2) and Articles 17a, and 21 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council.
Institucija, ki je začela notranji postopek o morebitnem preklicu pooblastila, si prizadeva o tem obvestiti drugo institucijo in Komisijo v razumnem roku pred sprejetjem končne odločitve ter pri tem navede pooblastila, ki bi bila lahko preklicana, in možne razloge za preklic.
The institution which has commenced an internal procedure for deciding whether to revoke a delegation of power shall endeavour to inform the other institution and the Commission within a reasonable time before the final decision is taken, indicating the delegated power which could be subject to revocation and possible reasons for a revocation.
Z odločitvijo o preklicu preneha veljati pooblastilo, navedena v tej odločitvi.
The decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision.
V členu 38 se odstavka 1 in 2 nadomestita z naslednjim: 1.
In Article 38, paragraphs 1and 2 are replaced by the following: 1.
Referenčni finančni znesek za izvajanje te uredbe v obdobju 2007–2013 je 17 087 milijonov EUR.
The financial reference amount for the implementation of this Regulation over the period 2007-2013 is EUR 17 087 million.
Ti zneski veljajo za obdobje 2007–2013.
These amounts are established for the period 2007-2013.
Vstavi se Priloga IIIa, ki je del Priloge I te uredbe.
Annex IIIa, as contained in Annex I to this Regulation, is inserted;
Priloga IV se nadomesti z vsebino Priloge II k tej uredbi.
Annex IV is replaced by the contents of Annex II to this Regulation.
„PRILOGA IIIa Države AKP, ki so glavne dobaviteljice banan
‘ANNEX IIIa Main ACP banana supplying countries
„PRILOGA IV Okvirna finančna sredstva za obdobje 2007–2013 (v milijonih eur)
‘ANNEX IV Indicative financial allocations for the period 2007-2013 (in EUR million)
Države AKP, ki so pogodbenice protokola o sladkorju
ACP Sugar Protocol countries
Države AKP, ki so glavne dobaviteljice banan
Main ACP banana-supplying countries
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 21. oktobra 2010 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o navedbi države porekla za določene izdelke, uvožene iz tretjih držav ( KOM(2005)0661 – C7-0048/2010 – 2005/0254(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 21 October 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the indication of the country of origin of certain products imported from third countries ( COM(2005)0661 – C7-0048/2010 – 2005/0254(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2005)0661 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2005)0661 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim je Komisija predložila predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0048/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union , pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0048/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0273/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0273/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 207 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207 thereof,
ob upoštevanju predloga Evropske komisije,
Having regard to proposal from the European Commission,
Evropska unija nima usklajenih določb ali enotne prakse za označevanje porekla v Uniji, razen v posebnih primerih na kmetijskem področju.
The European Union does not have harmonised provisions or uniform practices on origin marking in the Union, except for some specific cases in the agricultural sector.
To uredbo je treba uporabljati za uvožene industrijske izdelke, razen za ribiške proizvode in proizvode iz ribogojstva iz člena 1 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 104/2000 z dne 17. decembra 1999 o skupnih tržnih ureditvah za ribiške proizvode in proizvode iz ribogojstva UL L 17, 21.1.2000, str.
This Regulation should apply to imported industrial products, excluding fishery and aquaculture products as defined in Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p.
in razen za živila iz člena 2 Uredbe (ES) št. 178/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. januarja 2002 o določitvi splošnih načel in zahtevah živilske zakonodaje, ustanovitvi Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in postopkih, ki zadevajo varnost hrane UL L 31, 1.2.2002, str.
, and also excluding foodstuff as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety OJ L 31, 1.2.2002, p.
Danes številna podjetja v Uniji že prostovoljno označujejo poreklo blaga.
Today many companies in the Union already voluntarily use origin marking.
Zaradi pomanjkanja predpisov Uniji in razlik med veljavnimi sistemi v državah članicah glede navajanja porekla države za določene izdelke, pa številni izdelki določenih sektorjev, ki se uvozijo iz tretjih držav in porazdelijo po trgu Unije, niso opremljeni z informacijami o državi porekla ali pa so te informacije zavajajoče.
The absence of Union rules and the disparities between the systems in force in the Member States, as regards the indication on certain products of their country of origin, has given rise to a situation where in a number of sectors a major share of products imported from third countries and distributed within the Union market are found to carry no or misleading information concerning their country of origin.
Zaradi teh razlik se uvozni promet iz tretjih držav preusmerja na posebna vstopna mesta v Uniji, ki najbolj ustrezajo državi izvoznici.
These disparities are also leading to a situation where import traffic from third countries is shifting towards particular Union points of entry which suit the exporting country most.
Izidi splošnega posvetovanja Komisije z zainteresiranimi stranmi (ki so vključevali industrijo, uvoznike, združenja potrošnikov, sindikate) o možnem oblikovanju uredbe EU o označevanju porekla blaga kaže, da je zavedanje potrošnikov v Uniji o pomenu označevanja porekla njim v vednost zaradi varnosti in socialnih ter okoljskih vprašanj na splošno na visoki ravni.
The results of the Commission's general stakeholder consultation (which included industry, importers, consumers associations, trade unions) on the possible development of an EU Regulation on origin marking indicate that Union consumers' perception of the relevance of origin marking for informing them in relation to safety and social and environmental concerns is generally high.
Ureditev Unije o označevanju porekla državljani dojemajo kot tesno povezano z zaščito njihovega zdravja in varnosti.
Union regulation of origin marking is perceived by EU citizens to be closely linked with protection of their health and safety.
V lizbonski agendi si je EU zadala cilj, da okrepi gospodarstvo Unije, tako da med drugim izboljša konkurenčnost industrije Unije v svetovnem gospodarstvu, strategija EU 2020 pa mora graditi na tej potrebi po izboljšanju konkurenčnosti; za nekatere kategorije potrošniškega blaga je konkurenčnost v dejstvu, da je njihova proizvodnja v EU povezana s slovesom kakovosti in visokih proizvodnih standardov.
In the Lisbon Agenda, the EU set itself the objective of strengthening the Union economy by, inter alia, improving the competitiveness of the Union industry in the world economy and the EU 2020 strategy is committed to building on this need for improving competitiveness; for certain categories of consumer goods, competitiveness may lie in the fact that their production in the EU is associated with a reputation for quality and high production standards.
Pravila Unije o označevanju porekla bi okrepila konkurenčnost podjetij v Uniji in celotnega gospodarstva Unije ter bi omogočila državljanom in potrošnikom, da sprejemajo preudarne odločitve.
Union rules on origin marking would strengthen the competitiveness of Union firms and of the Union economy as a whole by enabling citizens and consumers to make informed choices.
Nekatere glavne trgovinske partnerice EU so na podlagi svojih izkušenj izpostavile gospodarski pomen, ki ga ima označevanja porekla blaga za izbiro potrošnika in trgovino, in sprejele zahteve za obvezno označevanje porekla blaga.
The economic significance of origin marking to consumer decision and trade is recognised by the practice of other major trading partners which have enacted mandatory origin marking requirements.
Izvozniki v Uniji morajo te zahteve izpolnjevati in izdelke, ki jih želijo na te trge izvoziti, označiti s poreklom blaga.
Exporters in the Union have to comply with those requirements and have to mark the origin on products they wish to export to these markets.
V številnih primerih je prišlo do zdravstvenih in varnostnih nezgod zaradi izdelkov, uvoženih v EU iz tretjih držav.
There have been several cases of health and safety incidents arising from products imported into the EU from third countries.
Carinski organi držav članic bi morali izvajati preglede in nadzor na meji glede izvrševanja te uredbe z enotnim usklajenim postopkom, da se zmanjša upravno breme.
The Member States' customs authorities should perform border checks and controls on the implementation of this Regulation via a single harmonised procedure so as to reduce the administrative burden.