natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker je treba v trgovinskih pogovorih z Japonsko obravnavati vprašanja naložb in trgovine s storitvami in s tem zagotoviti, da dodatno odprtje trga ne bi ogrozilo evropskih ali japonskih pravil o zaščiti javnih storitev, okolja in kulturne raznolikosti,
D. whereas questions of investment and trade in services need to be raised in trade discussions with Japan, ensuring that further market opening does not compromise either European nor Japanese rules on the protection of public services, environment and cultural diversity,
E. ker študije dokazujejo, da je vpliv netarifnih ovir v trgovini z Japonsko veliko večji kot vpliv tarif, kar delno pojasnjuje razmeroma majhen obseg trgovine med Unijo in Japonsko,
E. whereas studies indicate that the impact of non-tariff barriers in trade with Japan is much higher than the impact of tariffs, partly explaining the relatively low volume of trade between the Union and Japan,
2. poziva Komisijo, naj razvije poseben mehanizem za reševanje trgovinskih vidikov, da se prispeva k hitrejši gospodarski oživitvi držav, žrtev naravnih nesreč;
Calls on the Commission to develop a special mechanism addressing trade aspects in order to contribute to a quicker economic recovery of countries which are victims of natural disasters;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj dejavno sodeluje z Japonsko in na svetovni ravni prispeva k razmisleku o reformi WTO in svetovnemu vodenju za bolj vključujočo in pošteno mednarodno trgovino;
Calls on the Commission to actively engage with Japan to contribute to a global reflection on the subject of the reform of the WTO and the global governance for a more inclusive and fair international trade;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj pri trgovinskih pogajanjih ugodi zahtevam državljanov EU in Japonske tako, da nameni prednost varovanju okolja in kakovosti življenja vseh državljanov;
Asks the Commission to meet the demands of citizens both in the EU and Japan by take prioritising the protection of environmental and the quality of life of all citizens in trade related negotiations;
2011 B7-0291/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0214/2011
4.5.2011 B7-0291/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0214/2011
o trenutnem stanju pogajanj glede sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo
on the state of play in the EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations
PE465.597v01-00 B7‑0291/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o trenutnem stanju na pogajanjih glede sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo
PE465.597v01-00 B7‑0291/2011 European Parliament resolution on the state of play in the EU-India Free Trade Agreement negotiations
– ob upoštevanju smernic Organizacije za ekonomsko sodelovanje in razvoj (OECD) za multinacionalna podjetja in tristranske deklaracije Mednarodne organizacije dela o načelih za multinacionalna podjetja in socialno politiko,
– having regard to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) Tripartite Declaration of Principles Concerning Multinational Enterprises and Social Policy,
– ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije s četrtega zasedanja ministrske konference STO, sprejete 14. novembra 2001 v Dohi, in zlasti njenega člena 44 o posebni in diferencirani obravnavi,
– having regard to the Ministerial Declaration of the Fourth Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference, adopted on 14 November 2001 in Doha, and in particular to paragraph 44 thereof, on Special and Differential Treatment (SDT),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. septembra 2005 o odnosih med EU in Indijo: o strateškem partnerstvu, UL C 227 E, 21.9.2006, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 29 September 2005 on EU-India relations: A Strategic Partnership OJ C 227 E, 21.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. marca 2009 o sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo ( 2008/2135(INI) ) UL C 117 E, 6.5.2000, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 26 March 2009 on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement ( 2008/2135(INI) ) OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2000, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. julija 2007 o sporazumu TRIPS in dostopu do zdravil UL C 175 E, 10.7.2008, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on the TRIPS Agreement and access to medicines OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. maja 2007 o globalni Evropi – zunanji vidiki konkurenčnosti UL C 102 E, 24.4.2008, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 22 May 2007 on Global Europe - external aspects of competitiveness OJ C 102 E, 24.4.2008, p.
A. ker bi Evropska unija morala še naprej dajati prednost večstranskemu sistemu trgovanja na podlagi pravil, vzpostavljenem v okviru STO, ki ponuja najboljše možnosti za odprto in enakopravno mednarodno trgovino z določitvijo ustreznih pravil in zagotavljanjem skladnosti z njimi,
A. whereas the European Union should continue to give priority to a rule-based multilateral trading system established through the WTO, which offers the best prospects for open and equitable international trade by establishing appropriate rules and ensuring compliance with them,
B. ker je uspešen in uravnotežen zaključek razvojnega programa iz Dohe ključnega pomena tako za EU kot Indijo in ker tak sporazum ne izključuje dvostranskih sporazumov STO+, ki lahko dopolnjujejo večstranska pravila;
B. whereas a successful and balanced conclusion of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA) is of crucial importance to both the European Union and India, and whereas such an agreement does not preclude bilateral WTO+ agreements, which can be complementary to multilateral rules,
C. ker je EU glavni vir indijskih tujih neposrednih naložb in je leta 2009 predstavljala 27 % skupnih tujih neposrednih naložb; ker je delež EU v zadnjih treh letih padel, in sicer s 37 % skupnih tujih neposrednih naložb leta 2007 na 32 % leta 2008 in 27 % leta 2009, medtem ko so bile tuje neposredne naložbe EU na Kitajskem precej višje kot v Indiji, saj so znašale 5,3 milijarde evrov v primerjavi s 3,1 milijarde evrov v Indiji,
C. whereas the European Union is India’s largest source of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), accounting for 27% of total FDI in 2009; whereas, however, the EU share has declined over the past three years, from 37% of total FDI in 2007 to 32% in 2008 and 27% in 2009, while EU FDI outflows to China in 2009 were significantly higher than those to India, amounting to EUR 5.3 billion as compared to EUR 3.1 bn to India,
D. ker je bila Indija leta 2000 17. najpomembnejša trgovinska partnerica Evropske unije, leta 2010 pa osma, pri čemer je obseg trgovine znašal 67,8 milijardne evrov; ker je relativni delež Evropske unije na indijskem trgu padel s 23,2% leta 1999 na 14,5% leta 2009, medtem ko se je njen tržni delež na Kitajske v istem obdobju povečal za štirikrat, z 2,6 % leta 1999 na 11,3 % leta 2009,
D. whereas India was the European Union’s seventeenth most important trading partner in 2000 and ranked eighth in 2010 (when such trade was worth EUR 67.8 bn); whereas, however, the EU’s relative share in India’s market fell from 23.2% in 1999 to 14.5% in 2009, while China’s market share was multiplied by four over the same period, from 2.6% in 1999 to 11.3% in 2009,
E. ker je Indija največja koristnica splošnega sistema preferencialov (GSP); ker je preferencialni uvoz ali uvoz brez dajatev Evropske unije iz Indije v letu 2009 znašal 19,9 milijard evrov, kar je 83 % vsega uvoza iz Indije v Evropsko unijo,
E. whereas India is the largest beneficiary of the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP); whereas the European Union’s imports from India at preferential rates or zero duty were worth EUR 19.9 bn in 2009 and accounted for 83% of total EU imports from India,
F. ker obe strani pričakujeta precejšnje koristi od oprave tarif, liberalizacije trgovine s storitvami in pravice do ustanavljanja ter ponovno potrjujeta, da se bosta zavzeli za znižanje tarif ter nadaljnjo liberalizacijo pravice do ustanavljanja in trgovine s storitvami,
F. whereas both parties expect to secure significant benefits from the elimination of tariffs, the liberalisation of trade in services and of establishment and reaffirm their commitment to tariff reductions and further liberalisation of establishment and of trade in services,
G. ker morajo dostop do trga spremljati pregledna in primerna pravila in standardi, da se zagotovi koristi, ki jih prinaša liberalizacija trgovine,
G. whereas market access needs to be accompanied by transparent and adequate rules and standards in order to ensure that trade liberalisation is beneficial,
H. ker dostop do trga ovirajo netarifne ovire, kot so zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve ali tehnične ovire, količinske omejitve, postopki za ugotavljanje skladnosti, mehanizmi trgovinske zaščite, carinski postopki, notranji davki ter nesprejetje mednarodnih norm in standardov,
H. whereas market access is being hampered by non-tariff barriers to trade (NTBs), such as health and safety requirements or technical barriers, quantitative restrictions, conformity procedures, trade defence mechanisms, customs procedures, internal taxation, and a failure to adopt international norms and standards,
I. ker je treba še bolj upoštevati priznavanje, ustrezno in učinkovito zaščito, izvajanje in uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, vključno s patenti, blagovnimi ali storitvenimi znamkami, avtorskimi in sorodnimi pravicami, geografskimi označbami (skupaj z označbami porekla), industrijskim oblikovanjem in topografijami tiskanih vezij,
I. whereas even greater account should be taken of the elements on recognition, suitable and effective protection, implementation and enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs), including patents, trade or service marks, copyright and similar rights, geographical indications (GIs) (including marks of origin), industrial design and integrated circuit topography,
J. ker so lahko ponarejena zdravila škodljiva zdravju; ker bi morali EU in Indija združiti sile pri reševanju tega vprašanja,
J. whereas counterfeit medicines can potentially be detrimental to health; whereas EU and India should join forces to address this problem,
K. ker je Indija ena izmed največjih proizvajalk in izvoznic generičnih zdravil,
K. whereas India is one of the major producers and exporters of generic medicines,
L. ker člen 1(1) sporazuma o sodelovanju predvideva spoštovanje človekovih pravic in demokratičnih načel; ker je to bistven element sporazuma,
L. whereas Article 1(1) of the Cooperation Agreement provides for respect for human rights and democratic principles; whereas this constitutes an essential element of the agreement,
M. ker dostop podjetij EU na indijski trg še naprej ovirajo številne netarifne ovire, kot so oteževalne zdravstvene in varnostne zahteve ali tehnične ovire, količinske omejitve, prestrogi postopki za ugotavljanje skladnosti, neupravičeni mehanizmi trgovinske zaščite, carinski postopki, notranji davki ter nesprejetje mednarodnih norm in standardov,
M. whereas access by EU businesses to the Indian market is still being hampered by several NTBs, such as burdensome health and safety requirements or technical barriers, quantitative restrictions, overly restrictive conformity procedures, unjustified trade defence mechanisms, customs procedures, internal taxation, and a failure to adopt international norms and standards,
7. ugotavlja, da so se povprečne tarife, ki se uporabljajo v Indiji, zmanjšale, vendar so še vedno višje kot tarife EU; zlasti izpostavlja, da znaša indijska povprečna tarifa za dostop na nekmetijske trge sedaj 10,1 %, v primerjavi s povprečno tarifo 4 % v EU, medtem ko je indijska povprečna tarifa za kmetijske izdelke 31, 8 %, v EU pa 13,5 %;
Notes that India’s average applied tariffs have fallen but are still considerably higher than the EU’s tariffs; points out in particular that India’s average tariff for Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) is now 10.1%, as compared to an EU average of 4%, while India’s average tariff for agriculture is 31.8%, as compared to an EU average of 13.5%;
14. priznava, da so storitve najhitreje rastoči sektor indijskega gospodarstva; meni, da ima Indija napadalne interese glede liberalizacije po načinu 1 in načinu 4 iz splošnega sporazuma o trgovini in storitvah (GATS); ugotavlja, da bi EU za večino storitev rada zaključila liberalizacijo glede dostopa do trga in nacionalne obravnave po načinu 3; ugotavlja, da sporazum o prosti trgovini ne bo mogel v celoti učinkovati brez obvez načina 4; poudarja, da obstajajo velike koristi akreditacije poklicnih kvalifikacij na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU ter sporazumov o medsebojnem priznavanju in zahtev za pridobitev dovoljenj za strokovne storitve v EU in Indiji, kar bi se lahko brez težav vključilo v sporazum o prosti trgovini; kljub temu zahteva, naj se izvede temeljita analiza za primere posameznih držav članice, da bi se izognili negativnim posledicam za trg dela v EU, hkrati pa omogočili začasno bivanje potrebnim strokovnjakom v skladu z načinom 4;
Recognises that services are the fastest growing sector of the Indian economy; notes that India has offensive interests in the liberalisation of Mode 1 and Mode 4 in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS); notes that the EU would like to complete liberalisation of market access and national treatment under Mode 3 in most services; notes that the full ambitions of the FTA cannot be realised without commitments under Mode 4; stresses that there are huge benefits from nationwide and EU-wide accreditation of professional qualifications and agreements on mutual recognition and licensing requirements within professional services in both the EU and India, which could be easily covered by the FTA; requests, nevertheless, that a thorough analysis be carried out in relation to the individual Member States in order to avoid negative consequences for the EU labour market, while permitting, under Mode 4, temporary stays of necessary skilled professionals;
19. spodbuja Indijo, naj še bolj odpre svoj bančni in zavarovalniški sektor ter trgovino na drobno, v skladu z reformami, ki so jih indijske oblasti napovedale ob priznanju pomena ustrezne finančne zakonodaje za nadzor nad finančnimi storitvami, za zmanjšanje sistemskih tveganj in za zagotavljanje največje možne ravni zaščite potrošnikov;
Encourages India to further open up its banking, insurance and retail sectors in line with the reforms announced by the Indian authorities in recognition of the fact that appropriate financial legislation is important to ensure oversight of financial services, reduce systemic risk and provide the highest possible level of consumer protection;
Trgovina in konkurenca
Trade and competition
25. poziva Komisijo in pristojne indijske oblasti, naj skupaj oblikujejo opredelitev ponarejenih zdravil tako, da s tem ne bosta ovirali dostopa do osnovnih zdravil, ter naj uskladita ukrepe za učinkovit boj proti ponarejanju, zlasti proti ponarejenim zdravilom, ki ogrožajo zdravje pacientov;
Calls on the Commission and the Indian authorities concerned to jointly work out a common definition of counterfeit medicines in a way that would not hamper to access to essential medicines, and to coordinate action to effectively combat counterfeiting and, in particular, counterfeit medicines that are detrimental to patients health;
Trgovina in trajnostni razvoj
Trade and sustainable development
31. poudarja, da so človekove pravice, demokracija in varnost bistveni del odnosov med EU in Indijo; zato obe strani poziva, naj pospešita dialog o odprtih vprašanjih, še zlasti glede Kašmirja;
Stresses that human rights, democracy and security are essential elements of the relationship between EU and India; calls, therefore, on both sides to ensure that dialogue on open issues is stepped up, with particular reference to Kashmir;
Vloga Evropskega parlamenta
The European Parliament ’ s role
2011 B7-0292/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0214/2011
4.5.2011 B7-0292/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0214/2011
PE465.598v01-00 B7‑0292/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu o prosti trgovini med EU in Indijo
PE465.598v01-00 B7‑0292/2011 European Parliament resolution on an EU-India Free Trade Agreement
– ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije s 4. ministrske konference Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (WTO), sprejete 14. novembra 2001 v Dohi, in zlasti njenega člena 44 o posebni in diferencirani obravnavi,
– having regard to the Ministerial Declaration of the Fourth WTO Ministerial Conference, adopted on 14 November 2001 in Doha and in particular its paragraph 44 on Special and Differential Treatment (SDT),
– ob upoštevanju odločitve WTO glede sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS) in javnega zdravja, sprejete 29. novembra 2005,
– having regard to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) decision on the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) and Public Health adopted on 29 November 2005,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. julija 2007 o sporazumu TRIPS in dostopu do zdravil UL C 175 E, 10.07.2008, str.
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on The TRIPS Agreement and access to medicines OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju smernic OECD za večnacionalna podjetja, tristranske deklaracije o načelih večnacionalnih podjetij in socialne politike Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO), kodeksov ravnanja, sprejetih pod okriljem mednarodnih organizacij, kot so Organizacija združenih narodov za prehrano in kmetijstvo (FAO), Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija in Svetovna banka, in prizadevanj pod pokroviteljstvom Konference OZN o trgovini in razvoju v zvezi z dejavnostmi podjetij v državah v razvoju,
– having regard to the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO) tripartite declaration of principles concerning multinational enterprises and social policy, the codes of conduct agreed under the auspices of international organisations such as the FAO, the WHO and the World Bank, and the efforts made under the auspices of UNCTAD to regulate the activities of enterprises in developing countries,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 9. novembra 2010 z naslovom „Trgovina, rast in svetovne zadeve – Trgovinska politika je temeljna sestavina strategije EU 2020“ ( KOM(2010)0612 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 9 November 2010 entitled ‘Trade, Growth and World Affairs – Trade Policy as a core component of the EU's 2020 strategy’ ( COM(2010)0612 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o človekovih pravicah ter o socialnih in okoljskih standardih v mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih 1 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0434 .
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on human rights and social and environmental standards in international trade agreements 1 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0434 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o družbeni odgovornosti podjetij v mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih Sprejeta besedila, P7_T7(2010)0446.
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on corporate social responsibility in international trade agreements Texts adopted, P7_T7(2010)0446.
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave na vrhu EU-Indija z dne 10. decembra 2010 v Bruslju,
– having regard to the joint statement at EU-India Summit, 10 December 2010, Brussels,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropske komisije in vlade Indije o kulturi z dne 10. decembra 2010 v Bruslju,
– having regard to joint declaration of the European Commission and the Government of India on Culture, 10 December 2010, Brussels,
A. ker bi Evropska unija morala še naprej dajati prednost večstranskemu in na pravilih temelječemu sistemu trgovanja, vzpostavljenemu v okviru WTO, ki ponuja najboljše možnosti za pravično in enakopravno mednarodno trgovino tako, da določa ustrezna pravila in zagotavlja skladnost z njimi,
A. whereas the European Union should continue to give priority to a rule-based multilateral trading system, established through the WTO, which offers the best prospects for fair and equitable international trade by establishing appropriate rules and ensuring compliance with them,
B. ker morajo biti uravnoteženi dosežki razvojne agende iz Dohe še naprej prednostna naloga EU, saj bi morali državam v razvoju pomagati pri vključevanju v mednarodni sistem trgovanja,
B. whereas the EU should continue to give priority to achieving a balanced outcome of the Doha Development Agenda (DDA), which should support developing countries' integration in the international trading system,
C. ker je treba nujno opredeliti pravo ravnovesje med mnogostranskimi, dvostranskimi in večstranskimi sporazumi,
C. whereas it is essential to identify the right balance between multilateral, bilateral and plurilateral agreements,
F. ker je Indija največja koristnica splošnega sistema preferencialov (GSP); ker je preferencialni uvoz ali brez dajatev Evropske unije iz Indije v letu 2009 znašal 19,9 milijard EUR, kar je 83 % vsega uvoza iz Indije v Evropsko unijo,
F. whereas India is the largest beneficiary of the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) scheme; whereas the European Union's imports from India at preferential rate or zero duty amounted to 19.9 billion EUR in 2009 corresponding to 83% of total EU imports from India,
G. ker se na podlagi poročila Programa OZN za razvoj o človekovem razvoju za 2007/2008 Indija po indeksu človekovega razvoja uvršča na 128. mesto (od 177 držav); ker se Indija po indeksu revščine za države v razvoju med 108 državami v razvoju, za katere je bil indeks izračunan, uvršča na 62. mesto; in ker ima Indija eno najvišjih stopenj dela otrok,
G. whereas as stated in the 2007/2008 United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Report, India ranks 128 on the Human Development Index (out of 177 countries); whereas India ranks 62nd on the human poverty index for developing countries among 108 developing countries for which the index has been calculated; and whereas India has one of the highest incidences of child labour,
H. ker so se pogajanja o sporazumu o prosti trgovini z Indijo začela junija 2007,
H. whereas Negotiations for an a FTA with India were launched in June 2007,
I. ker je v skladu s pogodbami treba voditi trgovinsko politiko skladno z vsemi cilji Evropske unije, tudi s socialnimi in okoljskimi cilji ter cilji razvojne pomoči,
I. whereas, in accordance with the Treaties, the common commercial policy must be conducted in a manner consistent with all the European Union's objectives, including its social, environmental and development aid objectives,
J. ker je Indija med glavnimi proizvajalci in izvozniki generičnih zdravil v države v razvoju in zato določbe o intelektualnih pravicah nikakor ne smejo negativno vplivati na dostop do zdravil po sprejemljivih cenah,
J. whereas India is one of the major producer and exporter of generic medicines to the developing world, and therefore any provision on Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) shall not in any way impact negatively access to affordable medicines,
K. ker je za EU bistveno, da zagotovi boljšo prepoznavnost in učinkovito zaščito geografskih označb,
K. whereas it is of crucial importance for the EU to ensure better recognition and effective protection of geographical indications (GIs),
L. ker bi sporazum o prosti trgovini moral zajemati zavezujoče in izvršljive obveze na področju socialnih in okoljskih standardov, trajnostnega razvoja ter učinkovitega izvajanja mednarodno dogovorjenih standardov na socialnem in okoljskem področju, pa tudi standardov za družbeno odgovornost podjetij in dostojno delo,
L. whereas the FTA should include binding and enforceable commitments on social and environmental standards and sustainable development and effective implementation of internationally agreed standards in the social and environmental domain, as well as corporate social responsibility standards and decent work,