natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zbiranje podatkov o posameznikih le zato, ker so določenega rasnega ali etničnega porekla, verskega prepričanja, spolne usmerjenosti ali vedenja, političnega prepričanja ali ker so pripadniki določenih gibanj ali organizacij, ki niso prepovedane z zakonom, bi moralo biti prepovedano; treba je vzpostaviti zaščitne ukrepe v zvezi z varstvom in postopke za pritožbo zoper diskriminatorno uporabo instrumentov kazenskega pregona;
the collection of data on individuals solely on the basis that they have a particular racial or ethnic origin, religious conviction, sexual orientation or behaviour, political opinions or are members of particular movements or organisations which are not proscribed by law should be prohibited; it is necessary to establish safeguards regarding protection and procedures for appealing against the discriminatory use of law enforcement instruments;
javni organi se lahko pri sprejemanju odločitev o posameznikih zanesejo le na računalnike in se odpovejo človeški presoji samo izjemoma in ob zelo strogih zaščitnih ukrepih;
reliance by private or public bodies on computers to take decisions on individuals without human assessment should be allowed only exceptionally and under strict safeguards;
z zakonodajo bi morali biti predpisani strogi zaščitni ukrepi, ki bi zagotovili ustrezen in učinkovit sodni in parlamentarni nadzor nad dejavnostmi policije in tajnih služb, vključno z dejavnostmi za boj proti terorizmu;
there should be strong safeguards established by law which ensure appropriate and effective judicial and parliamentary scrutiny of the activities of the police and the secret services, including their counter-terrorism activities;
zaradi posledic, ki jih bodo morda čutili posamezniki, na katere se nanašajo podatki, je treba zagotoviti učinkovita in dostopna pravna sredstva ter posredovati jasne informacije o postopkih, ki vključujejo pravici do dostopa in popravka;
in view of the possible consequences for individuals, redress should be effective and accessible with clear information being given to the data subject on the applicable procedures accompanied by rights of access and rectification;
za vse dejavnosti profiliranja bi bilo treba vzpostaviti vrsto meril za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti, legitimnosti in skladnosti z vrednotami Evropske unije; treba je pregledati obstoječo in predlagano nacionalno in evropsko zakonodajo na področju uporabe profiliranja, da bi se prepričali, da izpolnjuje pravne zahteve zakonodaje Evropske unije in mednarodnih pogodb; treba je razmisliti o zakonodajni reformi EU, da bi oblikovali obvezujoča pravila, s katerimi bi se izognili kršitvam temeljnih pravic, ob upoštevanju pričakovanega priporočila Sveta Evrope o profiliranju;
a set of criteria should be established for assessing the effectiveness, legitimacy and consistency with European Union values of all profiling activities; existing and proposed national and EU legislation relating to the use of profiling should be reviewed in order to ascertain that it meets legal requirements under European law and international treaties; and EU law reform should be considered, if necessary, to produce binding rules which avoid any infringement of fundamental rights taking into account the anticipated Council of Europe recommendation on profiling;
treba bi bilo pregledati obseg, v katerem Direktiva 2000/43/ES prepoveduje ali ureja ukrepe in prakse o profiliranju, ter preučiti reformo, da bi se izključitev letališč in pristanišč črtala iz področja uporabe direktive;
there should be an examination of the extent to which Directive 2000/43/EC prohibits or regulates profiling measures and practices, and consideration of reform to remove the exclusion of airports and ports from its scope;
Svet bi moral naročiti študijo na podlagi ustreznega okvira in sedanjih praks, za pripravo bi bila odgovorna Komisija, ob posvetovanju z agencijo za temeljne pravice in evropskim nadzornikom za varstvo podatkov, kakor bi bilo primerno, ter ob posvetovanju z organi kazenskega pregona in obveščevalnimi službami, študija pa bi obsegala dejansko in morebitno uporabo tehnik profiliranja, njihovo učinkovitost pri identificiranju osumljencev in skladnost z državljanskimi svoboščinami, človekovimi pravicami in zahtevami glede zasebnosti; države članice bi bilo treba pozvati, naj predložijo podatke o prijetju in preiskovanju ter drugih ukrepih, ki izhajajo iz tehnik profiliranja;
the Council should commission a study, based on the relevant framework and current practices, to be conducted under the responsibility of the Commission, with the consultation of the Fundamental Rights Agency and the European Data Protection Supervisor, as appropriate, and in consultation with law enforcement and with intelligence agencies, covering the actual and potential application of profiling techniques, their effectiveness in identifying suspects and their compatibility with civil liberties, human rights and privacy requirements; Member States should be asked to supply figures on stop-and-search and other interventions which result from profiling techniques;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. aprila 2009 o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti - Boj proti goljufijam - Letno poročilo 2007 ( 2008/2242(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 April 2009 on the protection of the Communities' financial interests and the fight against fraud – Annual report 2007 ( 2008/2242(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 22. julija 2008 z naslovom "Zaščita finančnih interesov Skupnosti – Boj proti goljufijam – Letno poročilo 2007" ( KOM(2008)0475 ), vključno s prilogami ( SEK(2008)2300 in SEK(2008)2301 ),
having regard to the report of 22 July 2008 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council entitled "Protection of the Communities" financial interests – Fight against fraud – Annual report 2007" ( COM(2008)0475 ), including annexes ( SEC(2008)2300 and SEC(2008)2301 ) thereto,
ob upoštevanju poročila o delu Evropskega urada za bolj proti goljufijam za leto 2007 http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/synthesis/aar/doc/olaf_aar.pdf.
having regard to the OLAF Activity Report for 2007 http://ec.europa.eu/atwork/synthesis/aar/doc/olaf_aar.pdf.
in drugega poročila z dne 19. junija 2008 o izvajanju Uredbe Sveta (Euratom, ES) št. 2185/96 o pregledih in inšpekcijah na kraju samem, ki jih opravlja Komisija za zaščito finančnih interesov Evropskih skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi nepravilnostmi, ter smernic, ki nadomeščajo priročnik OLAF,
, and to its second report of 19 June 2008 on the application of Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities, as well as to the guidelines replacing the OLAF Vademecum,
ob upoštevanju poročila o delu nadzornega odbora Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam za obdobje od junija 2007 do maja 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/sup-com_en.html.
having regard to the Activity Report of the OLAF Supervisory Committee for the period from June 2007 to May 2008 http://ec.europa.eu/anti_fraud/reports/sup-com_en.html.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2007 UL C 286, 10.11.2008, str.
having regard to the European Court of Auditors" Annual Report on the Implementation of the Budget in the Financial Year 2007 OJ C 286, 10.11.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenj Odbora za regionalni razvoj in Odbora za kmetijstvo ( A6-0180/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Regional Development and the Committee on Agriculture ( A6-0180/2009 ),
pozdravlja vključitev poglavja o neposrednih izdatkih, vendar poudarja, da pričakuje nadaljnje izboljšanje z bolj obsežnimi podatki v naslednjih poročilih;
Welcomes the inclusion of a chapter on direct expenditure, but stresses that it expects it to be further improved with more comprehensive data in the following reports;
ponovno poziva, da se na dnevni red Sveta vključi letna poročila o zaščiti finančnih interesov Skupnosti (poročila PIF) in pripadajoče resolucije Parlamenta ter da nato Svet posreduje svoje pripombe Parlamentu in Komisiji; je razočaran, da Svet kljub pozivu Parlamenta in vztrajanju Komisije tega že ni storil;
Reiterates its call for the annual reports for the protection of the Communities' financial interests (annual PIF reports) and the corresponding resolutions by Parliament to be included on the Council's agenda, and for the Council subsequently to forward its observations to Parliament and the Commission; is deeply disappointed that the Council has not done yet done so, despite the call by Parliament and the insistence of the Commission;
ugotavlja, da je bilo v letu 2007 ugotovljenih skupno za 1.425 milijona EUR nepravilnosti (v letu 2006 pa 1.143 milijona EUR) na področjih lastnih sredstev, odhodkov za kmetijstvo, strukturnih ukrepov in neposrednih izdatkov; zneski, ki so jih države članice prijavile Komisiji v letu 2007, so razčlenjeni na:
Notes that in the areas of own resources, agricultural expenditure, structural actions and direct expenditure, irregularities notified in 2007 totalled EUR 1 425 million (compared to EUR 1 143 million in 2006); the amounts notified by the Member States to the Commission in 2007 can be broken down as follows:
Lastna sredstva: 377 milijonov EUR (353 milijonov EUR v 2006),
Own resources: EUR 377 million (EUR 353 million in 2006),
Odhodki za kmetijstvo: 155 milijonov EUR (87 milijonov EUR v 2006),
Agricultural expenditure: EUR 155 million (EUR 87 million in 2006),
Strukturni ukrepi: 828 milijonov EUR (703 milijonov EUR v 2006),
Structural actions: EUR 828 million (EUR 703 million in 2006),
Predpristopni skladi: 32 milijonov EUR (14 milijonov EUR v 2006),
Pre-accession funds: EUR 32 million (EUR 14 million in 2006),
Neposredni izdatki: 33 milijonov EUR
Direct expenditure: EUR 33 million;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija v svojem poročilu po lanskoletnem parlamentarnem poročilu opredelila razlike med nepravilnostmi in goljufijo; vendar opredelitev "suma goljufije" še vedno povzroča težave državam članicam;
Welcomes the fact that after last year's parliamentary report, the Commission has defined the differences between an irregularity and fraud in its report; however, the definition of "suspected fraud" still causes difficulties for the Member States;
pozdravlja dosedanja prizadevanja držav članic, vendar ponovno poudarja, da morajo le-te zagotoviti ustreznost svojih mehanizmov za finančni nadzor, in poudarja pomen preventivnih ukrepov držav članic, da se poveča odkrivanje nepravilnosti, preden se dejansko izvede katero koli plačilo upravičencem; poudarja dejstvo, da je boj proti goljufiji in korupciji stalna odgovornost držav članic ter tudi, da so za doseganje resničnega napredka potrebna skupna prizadevanja;
Welcomes the efforts already made by the Member States but stresses once again that they should ensure the adequacy of their financial control mechanisms and emphasises the importance of preventive action by the Member States in order to increase the detection of irregularities before any payment is effectively made to the beneficiaries; underlines the fact that fighting fraud and corruption is an ongoing responsibility of all Member States and also that a concerted effort is needed in order to achieve real improvements;
poudarja, da je treba doseči večjo usklajenost metod zbiranja in uporabe informacij, da se ponudi standardizirani okvir, ki bo, v okviru strategije povečanega preprečevanja, omogočil učinkovitejše ocenjevanje tveganj za goljufije;
Emphasises the need for greater harmonisation of methods for collecting and using information, with the aim of providing a standardised framework for evaluating more efficiently the risk of fraud as part of an intensified prevention strategy;
pozdravlja izjave nekaterih držav članic o upravljanju evropskih sredstev, ki se upravljajo na nacionalni ravni; poziva preostale države članice, naj sprožijo podobne pobude, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ukrene vse potrebno, da se take nacionalne izjave o upravljanju pripravijo v celotni Evropski uniji;
Welcomes the national management declarations issued by some Member States regarding European funds managed at national level; calls on the other Member States to carry out similar initiatives, and on the Commission to do all in its power to ensure that such national management declarations are introduced throughout the European Union;
ugotavlja, da se je ocenjeni znesek nepravilnosti povečal za 6 %; izdelki, pri katerih so se nepravilnosti pojavile v največjem obsegu, so tako kot v prejšnjih letih televizije in cigarete;
Notes that the estimated amount affected by irregularities rose by 6%; the products most affected by irregularities were, as in previous years, televisions and cigarettes;
obžaluje zamudo pri sprejemanju predloga uredbe o medsebojni upravni pomoči za zaščito finančnih interesov Skupnosti pred goljufijami in drugimi oblikami nezakonitega ravnanja ( KOM(2006)0473 ) in zato poziva Svet, naj nemudoma sprejme uredbo;
Deplores the delay in adopting the proposal for a regulation on mutual administrative assistance for the protection of the financial interests of the European Community against fraud and any other illegal activities ( COM(2006)0473 ) and therefore invites the Council promptly to adopt the regulation;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija po svojem sporočilu v zvezi s potrebo po razvoju usklajene strategije za izboljšanje boja proti davčni goljufiji ( KOM(2006)0254 ) sprejela sporočilo o usklajeni strategiji za izboljšanje boja proti goljufiji pri davku na dodano vrednost ( KOM(2007)0758 ), ter s posebno pozornostjo spremlja tako predlog Komisije za direktivo Sveta o vzajemni pomoči pri izterjavi terjatev v zvezi z davki, carinami in drugimi ukrepi ( KOM(2009)0028 ) ter predlog Komisije za direktivo Sveta o upravnem sodelovanju na področju obdavčevanja ( KOM(2009)0029 );
Welcomes the fact that, following its Communication concerning the need to develop a co-ordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud ( COM(2006)0254 ), the Commission adopted a Communication on a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against VAT fraud ( COM(2007)0758 ), and follows with special attention both the Commission proposal for a Council directive concerning mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to taxes, duties and other measures ( COM(2009)0028 ) and the Commission proposal for a Council directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation ( COM(2009)0029 );
vztraja, da so potrebne nove politične spodbude, da bi dosegli bistven napredek pri sodelovanju v boju proti goljufiji pri davku na dodano vrednost;
Insists that new political impetus is needed in order to achieve substantial improvements in cooperation in the fight against VAT fraud;
obžaluje dejstvo, da odkar OLAF nima dostopa do vsebine izmenjanih podatkov med državami članicami v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1798/2003 z dne 7. oktobra 2003 o upravnem sodelovanju na področju davka na dodano vrednost UL L 264, 15.10.2003, str.
Deplores the fact that since OLAF has no access to the content of the data exchange between the Member States under Council Regulation (EC) No 1798/2003 of 7 October 2003 on administrative cooperation in the field of value added tax OJ L 264, 15.10.2003, p.
, ne more zagotoviti dodane vrednost na področju obveščanja o goljufiji pri davku na dodano vrednost, preprečevanja in pomoči državam članicam pri aktivnostih v zvezi z bojem proti goljufiji; s tem v zvezi obžaluje dejstvo, da OLAF v letu 2007 nima primera v zvezi z goljufijo pri davku na dodano vrednost;
, it cannot provide added value in the field of anti-VAT fraud intelligence, prevention and support of Member States" anti-fraud operations; regrets in this context the fact that OLAF had no case on VAT fraud in 2007;
opozarja države članice na precejšnje število čeznacionalnih primerov goljufij pri davku na dodano vrednost;
Reminds Member States to be aware of the considerable number of transnational VAT fraud cases;
obžaluje povečanje števila goljufij, povezanih z izvorom izdelkov, ne samo v zvezi s preferencialnimi tarifnimi ukrepi, ampak tudi s tarifnimi kvotami iz splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT);
Regrets the increase in cases of fraud involving the origin of products, relating not only to the preferential tariff arrangements, but also to the GATT tariff quotas;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi specifično oceno o možnostih goljufij po izdelkih in po državah, ob upoštevanju možnosti izvajanja sistematičnih, usmerjenih in stalnih kontrol, tako v samem kraju izvora kot v namembnem kraju, ob posvečanju posebne pozornosti pojavu davčnega vrtiljaka;
Invites the Commission to undertake a specific assessment of the potential for fraud, by product and by country, taking into consideration the possibility of carrying out systematic, targeted and, where appropriate, permanent, checks both in the country of origin and the country of destination, paying particular attention to the phenomenon of carousel fraud;
ponovno poziva, da so od 1. januarja 2007 države članice dolžne obvestiti Komisijo o nepravilnostih, ki vključujejo več kot 10 000 EUR; to je meja, ki jo je Komisija uvedla z uredbo (ES) št. 1848/2006 z dne 14. decembra 2006 o nepravilnostih in izterjavi nepravilno plačanih zneskov v okviru financiranja skupne kmetijske politike ter organizaciji informacijskega sistema na tem področju UL L 355, 15.12.2006, str.
Recalls that as from 1 January 2007, Member States are obliged to inform the Commission of irregularities involving more than EUR 10 000, the threshold introduced by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1848/2006 of 14 December 2006 concerning irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid in connection with the financing of the common agricultural policy and the organisation of an information system in this field OJ L 355, 15.12.2006, p.
; ugotavlja, da se je število prijavljenih primerov nepravilnosti zmanjšalo za 53 % (1548 primerov v primerjavi z 3294 v letu 2006); poudarja, da je mogoče to relativno nizko število nepravilnosti razložiti z višjo določeno mejo za poročanje;
; observes that the number of cases of irregularities reported was down 53% (1 548 cases, compared to 3 294 in 2006); points out that this relatively low number of irregularities can be explained by the higher threshold for reporting;
ugotavlja, da se je ocenjeni znesek nepravilnosti povečal za 44 %, povečanje deloma povezano s primeri z znatnimi finančnimi posledicami, ki so se pojavili ali bili odkriti v preteklih letih, prijavljeni pa so bili šele v letu 2007, ugotavlja, da so bili najbolj prizadeti sektorji mleka in mlečnih izdelkov, sadja in zelenjave, sladkorja, razvoja podeželja, govedine in teletine;
Notes that the estimated amount affected rose by 44%, an increase relating in part to cases with a significant financial impact which arose or were discovered in previous years, but were reported only in 2007; notes that the sectors most affected were milk and milk products, fruit and vegetables, sugar, rural development, beef and veal;
poudarja, da v sektorjih mleka, sadja in zelenjave, sladkorja in razvoja podeželja nastane kar 77 % vseh nepravilnosti, samo v sektorju razvoja podeželja pa kar 38 % vseh nepravilnosti; ugotavlja še, da je bil največji znesek v zvezi z nepravilnostmi na področju razvoja podeželja ugotovljen pri pomoči za gozdarstvo, največje število nepravilnosti pa pri pomoči za kmetijstvo in okolje; zato poziva OLAF, naj v naslednjem letnem poročilu posebno pozornost nameni nepravilnostim pri razvoju podeželja;
Points out that the milk, fruit and vegetable, sugar and rural development sectors taken together account for about 77% of the total amount of irregularities and that rural development represents alone about 38% of all irregularities reported; further notes that the highest amount in irregularities within rural development is reported for the support measure "forestry" and the highest number of irregularities is reported for the support measure "agri-environment"; therefore asks OLAF to pay special attention in its next annual report to the irregularities affecting rural development;
poudarja, da se stopnje poročanja, zlasti pravočasnega poročanja, bistveno razlikujejo med državami članicami; obžaluje, da časovni zamik med odkritjem nepravilnosti in poročanjem o njih v Avstriji in na Švedskem močno presega povprečno vrednost, ki znaša 1,2 leta: v Avstriji namreč ta zamik znaša 3,4, na Švedskem pa 2,3 leta;
Points out that the reporting compliance rates, in particular timely reporting, vary greatly between Member States; deplores that for Austria and Sweden the time gap between the detection and the reporting of the irregularities is far beyond the average time gap (1,2 years): 3,4 and 2,3 years respectively;
se strinja z izjavo Evropskega računskega sodišča v odstavku 5.20 zgoraj navedenega letnega poročila, da je integriran administrativni in kontrolni sistem še vedno učinkovit kontrolni sistem, ki omejuje nevarnost nepravilnih odhodkov, če se ustrezno izvaja in če so vanj vneseni točni in zanesljivi podatki; zagovarja, da se uporaba sistema razširi na nova področja, ki do sedaj vanj niso bila vključena; vendar ugotavlja, da je treba povečati količino in kakovost pregledov, opravljenih v okviru sistema, da se okrepi odvračanje od goljufij;
Agrees with the statement of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) at paragraph 5.20 of its above-mentioned annual report that the Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) continues to be an effective control system which limits the risk of irregular expenditure where properly implemented and if accurate and reliable data are entered into it; advocates extending the application of the system into new areas presently not covered by it; notes however that the quantity and quality of the checks made under it should be stepped up in order to reinforce fraud deterrence;
poziva Komisijo, da sprejme trdno politično odločitev, če grške oblasti ne bi izpolnile rokov, določenih z akcijskim načrtom za vzpostavitev novega operativnega identifikacijskega sistema zemljiških parcel-geografskega informacijskega sistema;
Calls on the Commission to take a firm political decision should the Greek authorities fail to comply with the deadlines set by the action plan for setting up a new operational Land Parcel Identification System-Geographical Information System;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, da oceni učinkovitost in transparentnost sistemov spremljanja, ki se nanašajo na izplačila kmetom, v okviru svojega letnega poročila;
Reiterates its call on the Commission to evaluate the efficiency and transparency of monitoring systems relating to payment of farmers in the context of its next annual report;
pozdravlja poenostavljena in pojasnjena pravila Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu (UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Welcomes the simplified and clarified rules of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
in izvedbeno Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 1828/2006 UL L 371, 27.12.2006, str.
and the implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 1828/2006 OJ L 371, 27.12.2006, p.