natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja poročilo skupine strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema (EXPRESS); poziva evropske in nacionalne organizacije za standardizacijo, države članice in Komisijo, naj uresničijo strateška priporočila, da bi vzpostavili evropski standardizacijski sistem, ki bi se bil sposoben odzvati na družbene in gospodarske potrebe ter ohraniti vodilno vlogo v globalnem standardizacijskem sistemu;
Commends the report of the Expert Panel for the Review of the European Standardisation System (EXPRESS); calls on European and national standardisation organisations, the Member States and the Commission to implement its strategic recommendations in order to deliver a European standardisation system capable of responding to societal and economic needs and maintaining its leading role in the global standardisation system;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlogu za pregled sedanjega pravnega okvira evropske standardizacije priloži strateški dokument, s katerim bi vzpostavili obsežen okvir za ukrepanje na evropski in nacionalni ravni, vključno s konkretnimi predlogi za tiste izboljšave, ki jih ni mogoče izvesti s pregledom zakonodaje; poudarja, da ta strateški dokument ne bi smel biti omejen le na priporočila iz poročila skupine strokovnjakov za pregled evropskega standardizacijskega sistema;
Asks the Commission to accompany the proposal for the review of the current legal framework on European standardisation with a strategy document establishing a comprehensive framework for action at European and national level, including concrete proposals for those improvements that cannot be implemented through the review of the legislation; stresses that such a strategy document should not be limited to the recommendations contained in the EXPRESS report;
pozdravlja belo knjigo z naslovom „Posodobitev standardizacije IKT v EU – pot naprej“; poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj izvajajo glavna priporočila, navedena v beli knjigi, da bi v evropskem in nacionalnih standardizacijskih sistemih zagotovile razvoj ustreznih globalnih standardov informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije za izvajanje in uporabo politik in javnih razpisov EU;
Welcomes the Commission white paper on ‘Modernising ICT Standardisation in the EU – The Way Forward’; calls on the Member States and the Commission to implement the key recommendations outlined in the white paper in order to ensure the development, within the European and international standardisation systems, of relevant global ICT standards for implementation and use in EU policies and public procurement;
podpira namero Komisije, da bi v pravni okvir evropske standardizacije vključila načela iz sporazuma Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o tehničnih ovirah v trgovini (preglednost, odprtost, nepristranskost, konsenz, uspešnost, pomembnost in skladnost), zato da bi okrepila njihovo izvajanje v evropskem standardizacijskem sistemu; meni, da vključevanje teh načel v pravni okvir ne bi smelo povečati števila priznanih evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo na več kot obstoječe tri (Evropski odbor za standardizacijo, Evropski odbor za standardizacijo v elektrotehniki in Evropski inštitut za telekomunikacijske standarde);
Endorses the Commission's intention to integrate into the legal framework of European standardisation the principles of the World Trade Organization's agreement on technical barriers to trade (transparency, openness, impartiality, consensus, effectiveness, relevance and coherence) in order to reinforce their application within the European standardisation system; holds the view that the integration of those principles should not increase the number of recognised European standardisation organisations (ESOs) beyond the three existing ones, namely CEN, CENELEC and ETSI;
meni, da bi ta načela lahko dopolnili z dodatnimi oznakami, na primer vzdrževanjem, dostopnostjo, kakovostjo, nevtralnostjo in odgovornostjo; je prepričan, da je treba vsa ta načela podrobneje opredeliti ter vzpostaviti poseben sistem spremljanja, s čimer se bo zagotovilo, da bo njihovo izvajanje na nacionalni in evropski ravni pri razvijanju standardov podpiralo politike in zakonodajo EU;
Considers that these principles could be complemented by additional attributes such as maintenance, availability, quality, neutrality and accountability; believes that all those principles need to be further detailed and defined, and that a specific monitoring system must be introduced to ensure their implementation at national and European level in the development of standards in support of EU policies and legislation;
vendar poudarja, da ta načela sama po sebi niso dovolj za zagotovitev ustrezne zastopanosti vseh interesnih skupin v procesu standardizacije – zlasti tistih, ki zastopajo interese v zvezi z zdravjem in varnostjo, potrošniki in okoljem; zato meni, da je vključitev dodatnega načela ustrezne zastopanosti bistveni element, saj je vedno, kadar gre za javni interes, izredno pomembno ustrezno vključiti stališča vseh interesnih skupin, zlasti pri oblikovanju standardov, s katerimi naj bi podprli zakonodajo in politike EU, hkrati pa priznati, da je treba k posameznim projektom standardizacije pritegniti najboljše tehnične strokovnjake;
Stresses, however, that these principles are not in themselves sufficient to ensure that all stakeholders – in particular those representing health and safety, consumer and environmental interests – are adequately represented in the standard-setting process within the European standardisation system; considers, therefore, that a vital element is the addition of the principle of ‘appropriate representation’, given that it is of the utmost importance, whenever the public interest is concerned, to incorporate all stakeholder positions in an appropriate manner, especially in the development of standards intended to support EU legislation and policies, while acknowledging the need to engage the most relevant technical experts for a given standardisation project;
poudarja, da mala in srednja podjetja, četudi so pomemben del evropskega trga, ne sodelujejo ustrezno pri standardizacijskem sistemu in zato ne morejo v celoti izrabiti koristi, ki iz standardizacije izhajajo; meni, da je bistveno izboljšati njihovo zastopanost in sodelovanje v sistemu, zlasti v tehničnih odborih na nacionalni ravni; poziva Komisijo, naj z oceno vplivov v okviru revizije evropskega standardizacijskega sistema opredeli najboljši način za dosego tega cilja in oceni potrebno financiranje za pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem;
Stresses that SMEs, although they represent an essential part of the European market, are not adequately involved in the standardisation system and cannot, therefore, exploit entirely the benefits derived from standardisation; believes that it is essential to improve their representation and participation in the system, especially in the technical committees at national level; asks the Commission to identify, through its impact assessment in the context of the revision of the European standardisation system, the best way to reach this aim, evaluating the necessary funding to help SMEs;
poudarja, da so standardi sicer prispevali k znatnemu izboljšanju kakovosti in varnosti blaga, vendar na področju storitev še zdaleč niso tako številčni, da bi bili sorazmerni z gospodarskim pomenom in potencialom tega sektorja; ugotavlja zlasti, da število nacionalnih standardov za storitve, ki so v zadnjih letih nastali v Evropi, močno presega število evropskih standardov, oblikovanih v tem sektorju;
Points out that, although standards have contributed to a considerable improvement in the quality and safety of goods, their availability in the area of services is far from commensurate with the economic importance and potential of this sector; notes in particular that the number of national standards for services developed in Europe in recent years exceeds by far the equivalent number of European standards developed in the sector;
ugotavlja, da standardi za storitve pogosto ustrezajo nacionalnim posebnostim in da je njihov razvoj povezan s potrebami trga, pa tudi z interesi potrošnikov in javnim interesom; poudarja, da bi moral razvoj evropskih standardov za storitve, na primer priprava lastnih listin kakovosti ali znakov kakovosti poklicnih združenj na ravni Unije, kot je določeno v Direktivi 2006/123/ES o storitvah na notranjem trgu, pripomoči k nadaljnjemu usklajevanju v storitvenem sektorju, povečati preglednost, kakovost in konkurenčnost evropskih storitev ter spodbuditi konkurenco, inovacije, odpravljanje trgovinskih ovir in varstvo potrošnikov;
Recognises that service standards often respond to national specificities and that their development is related to the needs of the market, the interests of consumers and the public interest; stresses, that the development of European service standards, and the drawing-up by professional bodies of their own quality charters or labels at Union level, as provided for in Directive 2006/123/EC on services in the internal market, should benefit further harmonisation in the services sector, increase the transparency, quality and competitiveness of European services and promote competition, innovation, the reduction of trade barriers and consumer protection;
zato podpira namero Komisije, da bi standarde za storitve vključila v pravni okvir evropske standardizacije, saj s tem ne bo zgolj zagotovila obveščanja o vseh nacionalnih standardih za storitve, ki bi lahko tehnično ovirali trgovino na notranjem trgu, ampak tudi pripravila primerno pravno podlago, s katero bo lahko evropskim organizacijam za standardizacijo naročila oblikovanje standardov na točno določenih in natančno ovrednotenih področjih storitvenega sektorja; predlaga, naj Komisija spodbudi izvajalce storitev k oblikovanju standardov v sklopu evropskih organizacij za standardizacijo, da bi kolikor mogoče preprečili razdrobljenost različnih nacionalnih standardov, obenem pa zagotovili, da bodo standardi za storitve ustrezali potrebam trga in potrošnikov ter javnemu interesu; podpira prizadevanja za zagotovitev kakovostnih storitev, na primer listine ali znake kakovosti poklicnih organizacij, in spodbuja vse interesne skupine, naj dejavno sodelujejo v procesu evropske standardizacije;
Supports, therefore, the Commission's intention to include service standards in the legal framework of European standardisation, as this will not only ensure the notification of all national service standards that could potentially constitute technical barriers to trade in the internal market, but also provide a proper legal basis on which the Commission can request the ESOs to develop standards in well-defined and carefully assessed areas in the services sector; suggests to the Commission that it encourage service providers to develop standards within the ESOs in order, insofar as possible, to avoid fragmentation among different national standards, while ensuring that service standards are related to the needs of the market and consumers and the public interest; supports actions taken to ensure the quality of service provision, such as quality charters or labels drawn up by professional bodies, and encourages all relevant actors to participate in the European standardisation process;
Okrepitev evropskega standardizacijskega sistema
Empowering the European standardisation system
ponovno potrjuje, da se je evropska standardizacija v podporo zakonodaji na podlagi novega pristopa izkazala za uspešno in bistveno orodje za dokončno oblikovanje enotnega trga; ugotavlja, da se je v zadnjih letih povečalo število standardizacijskih mandatov v podporo zakonodaji na področjih, ki presegajo tista na podlagi novega pristopa, kar kaže, da je bil ta model sprejet v številnih politikah EU; meni, da je v skladu z načeli boljše zakonodaje zaželeno razširiti uporabo standardov na druga področja zakonodaje in politik Unije, ne le na enotni trg, pri čemer je treba upoštevati posebne značilnosti zadevnih področij;
Reaffirms that European standardisation in support of ‘New Approach’ legislation has proved to be a successful and essential tool for the completion of the single market; notes that the number of standardisation mandates supporting legislation in areas beyond those covered by the ‘New Approach’ has increased in recent years, indicating that this model has been adopted across a broad range of EU policies; believes that it is desirable to extend the use of standards in other areas of Union legislation and policies beyond the single market, taking into account the specificities of the areas concerned, in accordance with the principles of better regulation;
vztraja, da je izredno pomembno potegniti jasno črto med zakonodajo in standardizacijo, zato da bi preprečili vsakršno napačno razlaganje ciljev prava in zaželene ravni varstva; poudarja, da mora biti evropski zakonodajalec izredno pozoren in natančen pri opredelitvi osnovnih zahtev v pravni ureditvi, Komisija pa mora jasno in točno opredeliti cilje standardizacije v okviru mandatov; poudarja, da bi morala biti vloga standardizacijskih organov omejena na opredelitev tehničnih sredstev za doseganje ciljev, ki jih določi zakonodajalec, in zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva;
Maintains that it is of the utmost importance to draw a clear line between legislation and standardisation in order to avoid any misinterpretation with regard to the objectives of the law and the desired level of protection; stresses that the European legislator must be highly vigilant and precise when defining the essential requirements in regulation, while the Commission must clearly and accurately define the objectives of the standardisation work in the mandates; stresses that the role of standardisers should be limited to defining the technical means of reaching the goals set by the legislator as well as ensuring a high level of protection;
ponavlja, kako bistveno je, da se vsi evropski standardi razvijejo v razumnem obdobju, zlasti na tistih področjih, kjer so standardi potrebni hitro, da bi izpolnili zahteve javnih politik in hitro se spreminjajočih razmer na trgu; zato poziva evropske in nacionalne standardizacijske organe, naj še naprej izboljšujejo svojo učinkovitost in uspešnost, hkrati pa upoštevajo, da proces pospešitve standardizacije ne sme škodovati načelom odprtosti, kakovosti, preglednosti in soglasja med vsemi interesnimi skupinami;
Reiterates that it is essential for European standards to be developed within a reasonable period of time, in particular in those areas where standards are needed quickly in order to meet the requirements of public policies and rapidly changing market conditions; invites, therefore, the European and national standards bodies to continue improving their efficiency and effectiveness, bearing in mind that the acceleration of the standardisation process must not take place to the detriment of the principles of openness, quality, transparency and consensus among all interested parties;
priznava, da je treba poenostaviti postopek za vzpostavitev standardov; poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z interesnimi skupinami poišče nove načine za optimizacijo učinkovitega sprejetja evropskih standardov;
Recognises the importance of simplifying the procedure for establishing standards; invites the Commission, in collaboration with stakeholders, to find new ways to optimise the effective adoption of European standards;
meni, da bo standardizacijski postopek delno pospešen z boljšim posvetovanjem med Komisijo in evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo pred izdajo mandata, ki jim bo omogočil, da se hitreje odzovejo, po možnosti v dveh mesecih, o njihovi možnosti, da začnejo projekt standardizacije;
Believes that the standardisation process will be partly accelerated through better consultation between the Commission and the ESOs prior to issuing a mandate, which will enable them to respond more quickly, preferably within a two-month period, about their possibility to undertake a standardisation project;
ugotavlja, da je odbor iz Direktive 98/34/ES pomemben kot forum med Komisijo in državami članicami v razpravi o vprašanjih, povezanih z tehničnimi predpisi in standardizacijo; meni, da je treba predstavnike Evropskega parlamenta povabiti na seje tega odbora (ali njegovega naslednika), ki bi obdržal status opazovalca v evropskih in nacionalnih organih za standardizacijo, obenem pa bi po potrebi tudi dopustil možnost opazovanja organizacij interesnih skupin na evropski ravni, zlasti med razpravo o standardizacijskih mandatih;
Notes the importance of the Directive 98/34/EC Committee as a forum between the Commission and the Member States in the discussion of issues related to technical regulations and standardisation; considers that European Parliament representatives should be invited to the meetings of this Committee (or its successor body), which, while maintaining the observership of European and national standardisation bodies, should also, where appropriate, be open to the observership of European-level stakeholder organisations, especially during the discussion of standardisation mandates;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju z evropskimi organizacijami za standardizacijo razvije in izvaja izboljšane in skladne sisteme za usklajevanje standardizacijskih politik in dejavnosti, ki bi morale zajemati vse vidike standardizacijskega postopka, od oblikovanja do vzpostavitve mandatov, prek spremljanja dela tehničnega odbora, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti, da bodo oblikovani standardi skladni s politikami EU in bodo izpolnjevali osnovne zahteve zadevne zakonodaje, do uradnega sprejetja, objave in uporabe standardov; poudarja vlogo, ki bi jo lahko imele ustrezne kategorije interesnih skupin kot svetovalna skupina za Komisijo pri oblikovanju usklajene evropske platforme za politiko standardizacije;
Urges the Commission to develop and implement, in cooperation with the ESOs, an improved and coherent system for coordinating standardisation policy and activities, which should cover all aspects of the standardisation process, from the preparation and delivery of mandates, through the monitoring of technical committee work, ensuring that the standards produced are consistent with EU policies and meet the essential requirements of the respective legislation, to the formal adoption, publication and use of the standards; emphasises the role that relevant stakeholder categories could play as an advisory group assisting the Commission in developing a harmonised European standardisation policy platform;
poziva države članice, naj izvajajo usklajeno standardizacijsko politiko ter sprejmejo skladen pristop do uporabe standardov v podporo zakonodaji; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da zaradi neusklajenih prizadevanj v zvezi s standardizacijo. konkurenčnih ali nepotrebnih standardov ali prevelikega števila shem certificiranja ne bo ogroženo doseganje ciljev politik EU;
Calls on Member States to implement a coordinated policy on standardisation and adopt a coherent approach with regard to the use of standards in support of legislation; calls on the Commission to make sure that the achievement of EU policy goals is not put at risk through uncoordinated standardisation efforts, competing or unnecessary standards, or a superfluity of certification schemes;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda in racionalizira postopek za podeljevanje standardizacijskih mandatov evropskim organizacijam za standardizacijo, da bodo obsegali fazo posvetovanja z ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami ter temeljito analizo, ki bi upravičila potrebo po novi dejavnosti oblikovanja standardov, da se zagotovi umestnost oblikovanja standardov, prepreči podvajanje in preveliko število različnih standardov in specifikacij;
Calls on the Commission to revise and rationalise the process to deliver standardisation mandates to ESOs, so as to include a consultation phase with relevant stakeholders and a thorough analysis that justifies the need for new standard-setting activity, in order to ensure the relevance of standard-setting and avoid duplication and the proliferation of divergent standards and specifications;
poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj predloži akcijski načrt, katerega cilji bodo celovitejši sistem EU za standardizacijo, učinkovitejše in uspešnejše oblikovanje standardov, boljši dostop do standardizacije, zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, močnejša vloga EU pri oblikovanju standardov na mednarodni ravni in bolj vzdržen finančni sistem za pripravo standardov;
Calls also on the Commission to present an action plan aiming at a more integrated EU standardisation system, more efficient and effective standard-setting, better access to standardisation, in particular for SMEs, a stronger EU role in standard-setting at international level and a more sustainable financing system for the development of standards;
poudarja pomembno vlogo, ki jo imajo „svetovalci za novi pristop“ pri preverjanju, ali so usklajeni standardi v skladu z ustrezno zakonodajo EU; opozarja na dejstvo, da te svetovalce zaenkrat izbirajo evropske organizacije za standardizacijo in da ti delujejo znotraj teh organizacij, ki zaradi tega nosijo veliko upravno breme, včasih pa to tudi povzroča zaskrbljenost pri interesnih skupinah glede nepristranskosti in neodvisnosti postopka; zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni potrebo po reviziji obstoječih postopkov; poleg tega meni, da bi morala Komisija opredeliti postopek, s katerim bi zagotovila, da so standardi, za katere so bili izdani mandati, v skladu z drugimi politikami in zakonodajo EU, ki presegajo okvir novega pristopa; meni, da bi se to moralo odvijati med pripravo standardov, da bi preprečili zamude in neučinkovitost zaradi naknadne zavrnitve;
Stresses the important role of the ‘New Approach consultants’ in verifying that harmonised standards comply with the corresponding EU legislation; draws attention to the fact that such consultants are currently selected by, and operate within, the ESOs, which places a significant administrative burden on these organisations and, at times, causes concern among stakeholders about the impartiality and independence of the process; calls on the Commission, therefore, to assess the need for a review of the existing procedures; believes, furthermore, that the Commission should identify a procedure for ensuring that mandated standards comply with other EU policies and legislation beyond the scope of the ‘New Approach’; considers that this should take place during the development of the standards in order to avoid delays and inefficiencies due to ex-post rejection;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj natančneje preverijo, kako uspešni so standardi, da bi zagotovile, da ti izpolnjujejo zahteve mandata, zlasti ko se uporabljajo za namene zakonodaje na podlagi novega pristopa, hkrati pa zagotovijo, da se postopek potrjevanja standardov ne bo bistveno podaljšal; namerava v okviru prihodnje revizije evropskega sistema za standardizacijo pregledati možnost, da bi tudi Parlament dobil pravico, ki jo imajo sedaj Komisija in države članice glede izpodbijanja usklajenih standardov, ki ne ustrezajo povsem osnovnim zahtevam ustrezne zakonodaje;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to check standards against delivery in a more thorough way in order to ensure that they meet the requirements of the mandate, in particular when the standards are used for the purposes of ‘New Approach’ legislation, while ensuring that no significant additional delays are built into the procedure for approving standards; intends to examine – in the context of the forthcoming review of the European standardisation system – the possibility of extending to Parliament the right, currently accorded to the Commission and Member States, to dispute a harmonised standard which does not appear to entirely satisfy the essential requirements of the corresponding legislation;