natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva k sprejetju ukrepov, ki bodo pospešili uveljavljanje pojma "lokalna živila", posebej ukrepov za pospeševanje posebnih lastnostih takšnih proizvodov ter njihovih zdravstvenih in finančnih koristi ter obveščanje potrošnikov o njih, pa tudi k podpori tradicionalnim tržnicam in tradicionalnim oblikam trgovine, pri katerih imajo proizvajalci neposreden stik s potrošniki;
Calls for measures to be put in place that give more impetus to the concept of "local foods", and especially actions to promote, and inform consumers on, the special characteristics of such products and their health benefits and financial advantages, as well as support for traditional markets and traditional types of commerce in which producers meet consumers directly;
poziva, naj Evropska unija in države članice bolj podpirajo ekološko kmetovanje; poziva tudi k ambiciozni politiki s finančnimi spodbudami za to vrsto kmetijske proizvodnje, ki bo potrošnikom omogočila, da pridobijo dostop do kakovostnih proizvodov po sprejemljivih cenah;
Calls for the European Union and the Member States to give greater encouragement to the organic sector; calls, furthermore, for an ambitious policy of financial incentives to encourage this type of agricultural production and enable consumers to obtain high-quality products at reasonable prices;
poziva k okrepitvi sodelovanja med proizvajalci, bodisi v tradicionalni obliki povezovanja proizvajalcev v organizacijah bodisi z vzpostavljanjem novih oblik sodelovanja kmetov pri tržnih dejavnostih;
Urges reinforcement of cooperation between producers either by following the traditional format of producer organisations or by introducing new forms of cooperation in marketing operations of farmers;
poziva k večjemu spodbujanju diferenciacije kmetijskih proizvodov kot načina trženja, kar dopušča različne cene, v skladu s kakovostjo;
Calls for greater promotion of the differentiation of agricultural products as a marketing concept, which leaves room for different prices, in accordance with quality;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi dejstva, da je močan pogajalski položaj proizvajalcev živil, ki izhaja iz močne blagovne znamke ali iz diferenciranja proizvodov, v breme trgovcev na drobno v zgoraj omenjenem sporočilu Komisije o cenah hrane v Evropi predstavljen neprimerno negativno v primerjavi z drugimi mnogo bolj pomembnimi dejavniki, kot so nepopolna konkurenca ali oligopoli/monopoli; meni, da oblikovanje močne prodajne znamke oziroma diferenciacija predstavljata dopustne prakse in da je nedopustna samo zloraba iz tega izhajajočega položaja;
Is concerned at the fact that the negotiating strength of food producers at the expense of retailers, due to a strong brand name or product differentiation, acquires a disproportionately negative significance in the above-mentioned Commission Communication on food prices in Europe, compared to other very much more important factors such as imperfect competition or oligopolistic/monopolistic practices; takes the view that the creation of a strong brand name or product differentiation are legitimate practices and that it is only the abuse of the position which these practices may confer that constitutes unfair practice;
poziva k okrepitvi in racionalizaciji politik Evropske unije za zaščito označb porekla in geografskih označb ter drugih oblik certificiranja, ki diferencirajo kmetijske proizvode; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja razpravo, ki jo je sprožila dne 15. oktobra 2008 objava Zelene knjige o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: proizvodni standardi, zahteve za kmetovanje in sheme kakovosti ( KOM(2008)0641 );
Calls for the reinforcement and streamlining of EU policies for the protection of origin and geographical indications and other certifications, which differentiate among agricultural products; welcomes, in this regard, the debate launched by the release on 15 October 2008 of the Green Paper on Agricultural Product Quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes ( COM(2008)0641 );
meni, da je treba na podlagi obstoječih modelov podrobneje raziskati možnost uvedbe posebne oznake na kmetijskih proizvodih EU; meni, da bi morala ta oznaka jamčiti za skladnost s proizvodnimi standardi EU, kot je na primer pravična obravnava tržnih udeležencev po vsej proizvodni in distribucijski verigi; prav tako meni, da takšna oznaka za potrošnike učinkuje kot spodbuda za povečano potrošnjo proizvodov EU in bi tako podpirala proizvajalce v EU;
Takes the view that the option of a special label on EU agricultural products should be explored in greater depth, based on existing models; considers that this label should guarantee compliance with EU production standards, such as fair treatment of market participants throughout the entire production and distribution chain; considers, further, that such a label would act as a stimulus to consumers, encouraging their consumption of EU products, and hence supporting EU producers;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni stroške, ki jih imajo proizvajalci zaradi izpolnjevanja predpisov Skupnosti o navzkrižni skladnosti, in v kolikšni meri se razlikujejo med državami članicami, ob upoštevanju, da so ti predpisi strožji od tistih, ki veljajo za uvožene proizvode;
Urges the Commission to evaluate the costs borne by producers in complying with Community rules on cross-compliance and the extent to which these differ between Member States, bearing in mind that those rules are more stringent than those applicable to imported products;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. marca 2009 o vplivu obsežne urbanizacije v Španiji na osebne pravice evropskih državljanov, okolje in uporabo prava EU, na podlagi prejetih peticij ( 2008/2248(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 26 March 2009 on the impact of extensive urbanisation in Spain on individual rights of European citizens, on the environment and on the application of EU law, based upon petitions received ( 2008/2248(INI) )
ob upoštevanju peticij, prejetih v zvezi s predmetom te resolucije, zlasti peticije 0609/03,
having regard to the petitions received in connection with the subject-matter of this resolution, notably Petition 0609/03,
ob upoštevanju pravice do peticij iz člena 194 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to the right of petition enshrined in Article 194 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0082/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0082/2009 ),
ker zagotavlja postopek vlaganja peticij evropskim državljanom in prebivalcem način za pridobitev izvensodnega sredstva za reševanje njihovih težav, kadar zadevajo vprašanja, ki so posledica dejavnosti Evropske unije,
whereas the petitions process provides European citizens and residents with a means of obtaining non-judicial redress for their grievances when these concern issues arising from the fields of activity of the European Union,
ker člen 6(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da Unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, načelih, ki so skupna državam članicam,
whereas Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union states that "[t]he Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States",
ker člen 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da mora Unija spoštovati temeljne pravice, ki jih zagotavlja Evropska konvencija o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP),
whereas in Article 6(2) of the EU Treaty the Union commits itself to respect fundamental rights as guaranteed by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the ECHR),
ker bi se moral vsak državljan ali prebivalec države podpisnice EKČP, ki meni, da so bile njegove človekove pravice kršene, obrniti na Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice v Strasbourgu, pri tem pa upoštevati, da mora v skladu s členom 35 EKČP izčrpati vse notranje pravne možnosti, preden lahko sproži postopek pri tem sodišču,
whereas any citizen or resident of a state signatory to the ECHR who considers that his/her human rights have been violated should approach the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, bearing in mind that before bringing any proceedings before that Court he/she must exhaust all domestic remedies, as is laid down in Article 35 of the ECHR,
ker člen 7 Pogodbe EU predvideva postopek, s katerim se lahko Unija odzove na kršitve načel iz člena 6(1) in poišče rešitve,
whereas Article 7 of the EU Treaty provides for procedures whereby the Union can respond to breaches of the principles mentioned in Article 6(1) and seek solutions,
ker daje člen 7 Pogodbe EU Parlamentu tudi pravico, da Svetu pošlje obrazložen predlog, da ugotovi, ali obstaja očitno tveganje, da bi država članica lahko huje kršila načela, na katerih temelji Unija,
whereas Article 7 of the EU Treaty also gives Parliament the right to make a reasoned proposal to the Council for determination of the question whether there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of the values on which the Union is founded,
ker člen 7 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah zagotavlja varstvo zasebnosti in družinskega življenja, vključno s stanovanji državljanov, in ker člen 8 EKČP daje enake pravice in pojasnjuje, da javna oblast se ne sme vmešavati v izvrševanje te pravice, razen če je to določeno z zakonom in nujno v demokratični družbi zaradi državne varnosti, javne varnosti ali ekonomske blaginje države, zato, da se prepreči nered ali zločin, da se zavaruje zdravje ali morala ali da se zavarujejo pravice in svoboščine drugih ljudi; ker so se Parlament, Svet in Komisija obvezali, da bodo spoštovali Listino pri vseh svojih dejavnostih,
whereas Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union guarantees the protection of privacy and family life, including the private home of citizens, and whereas Article 8 of the ECHR confers the same rights and clarifies that "[t]here shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others"; whereas Parliament, the Council and the Commission have committed themselves to respecting the Charter in all their activities,
ker je pravica do zasebne lastnine priznana kot temeljna pravica evropskih državljanov v členu 17 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki določa, da ima vsakdo pravico imeti v posesti svojo zakonito pridobljeno lastnino, jo uporabljati, z njo razpolagati in jo komu zapustiti, da se lastnina nikomur ne sme odvzeti, razen v javno korist v primerih in pod pogoji, ki jih določa zakon, vendar le proti pravični in pravočasni odškodnini za njeno izgubo, in da uživanje lastnine se lahko uredi z zakonom, kolikor je to potrebno zaradi splošnega interesa,
whereas the right to private property is recognised as a fundamental right of European citizens in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which provides that "[e]veryone has the right to own, use, dispose of and bequeath his or her lawfully acquired possessions", that "[n]o one may be deprived of his or her possessions, except in the public interest and in the cases and under the conditions provided for by law, subject to fair compensation being paid in good time for their loss", and that "[t]he use of property may be regulated by law in so far as is necessary for the general interest",
ker člen 18 Pogodbe ES določa, da ima vsak državljan Unije pravico prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ob upoštevanju omejitev in pogojev, določenih s to pogodbo in ukrepi, ki so bili sprejeti za njeno uveljavitev,
whereas Article 18 of the EC Treaty provides that "[e]very citizen of the Union shall have the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, subject to the limitations and conditions laid down in this Treaty and the measures adopted to give it effect",
[1976] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse 1039),
[1976] ECR 1039),
ker pa Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti dosledno potrjuje, da čeprav je lastninska pravica sestavni del splošnih načel prava Skupnosti, ni absolutna pravica in jo je treba razumeti v povezavi z njeno družbeno funkcijo in se torej njeno izvajanje lahko omeji, pod pogojem, da se omejitve dejansko skladajo s cilji splošnega interesa, za katere se zavzema Skupnost, ter ne povzročajo prekomernega in nedopustnega posega, ki bi ogrožal samo bistvo zagotovljenih pravic (glej sodbo z dne 10. decembra 2002 v zadevi C-491/01
whereas, however, the Court of Justice has consistently held that, whilst the right to property forms part of the general principles of Community law, it is not an absolute right and must be viewed in relation to its social function and whereas, consequently, its exercise may be restricted, provided that those restrictions in fact correspond to objectives of general interest pursued by the Community and do not constitute a disproportionate and intolerable interference, impairing the very substance of the rights guaranteed (see the judgment of 10 December 2002 in Case C-491/01
British American Tobacco (Investments) in Imperial Tobacco
British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco
[2002] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse I11453),
[2002] ECR I-11453),
ker ne glede na to, da sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča dosledno potrjuje, da kjer nacionalne določbe ne spadajo v področje prava Skupnosti, ta ni pristojna za oceno skladnosti ter določb s temeljnimi pravicami, katerih spoštovanje Sodišče zagotavlja (na primer sklep z dne 6. oktobra 2005 v zadevi C-328/04
whereas, notwithstanding that case-law, the Court of Justice has consistently held that, where national provisions fall outside the scope of Community law, there is no Community jurisdiction to assess the compatibility of those provisions with the fundamental rights whose observance the Court ensures (see, for instance, the order of 6 October 2005 in Case C-328/04
[2005] Zbirka odločb sodne prakse I-8577), odstavka 12 in 13),
[2005] ECR I-8577, paragraphs 12 and 13),
ker prvi odstavek člena 1 prvega dodatnega protokola k EKČP pravi, da ima vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba pravico do spoštovanja svojega premoženja in da nikomur ne sme biti lastnina odvzeta, razen če je to v javnem interesu v skladu s pogoji, ki jih določa zakon, in ob spoštovanju splošnih načel mednarodnega prava; ker drugi odstavek tega člena pravi, da se pravica držav, da uveljavijo zakone, za katere menijo, da so potrebni, lahko uporablja samo za nadzor nad uporabo premoženja v skladu s splošnim interesom ali za zagotovitev plačila davkov, drugih prispevkov ali denarnih kazni; in ker je Španija v času ratifikacije omenjenega protokola izrazila zadržek o členu 1 ob upoštevanju člena 33 španske ustave, ki določa: "Priznava se pravica do zasebne lastnine in dedovanja.
whereas the first paragraph of Article 1 of the first Additional Protocol to the ECHR declares that "[e]very natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions" and that "[n]o one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law"; whereas the second paragraph of that article states that "[t]he preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties"; and whereas, at the time of ratification of the said Protocol, Spain expressed a reservation in respect of Article 1 in the light of Article 33 of the Spanish Constitution, which provides as follows: "The right to private property and inheritance is recognised.
Lastnina se nikomur ne sme odvzeti, razen če je to v javnem ali družbenem interesu in na podlagi ustreznega nadomestila v skladu z zakonom. "
No one may be deprived of his or her property and rights, except on justified grounds of public utility or social interest and with a proper compensation in accordance with the law.",
ker Parlament meni, da je obveznost odstopitve zakonito pridobljene zasebne lastnine brez predpisanega postopka in ustreznega nadomestila in obveznost plačila samovoljnih stroškov za nezahtevan in pogosto nepotreben razvoj infrastrukture, kršitev temeljnih pravic posameznika na podlagi EKČP in sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (glej na primer
whereas Parliament considers that the obligation to cede legitimately acquired private property without due process and proper compensation and the obligation to pay arbitrary costs for unrequested and often unnecessary infrastructure development constitute a violation of an individual's fundamental rights under the ECHR and in the light of the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights (see, for instance,
Aka proti Turčiji
Aka v. Turkey
ker so leta 2008 španski organi lansko leto objavili tolmačenje za uporabo zakona o obalnih območjih iz leta 1989, ki se ga dolga leta ni spoštovalo, v tem času pa je bila na obalnih območjih Španije povzročena huda okoljska škoda; ker celo to tolmačenje ne določa jasnih izvedbenih ukrepov, ki naj bi jih upoštevali zadevni lokalni in regionalni organi, ter ker številne nove peticije pričajo o retroaktivnosti teh navodil, samovoljnem uničevanju in rušenju zakonito pridobljenih nepremičnin posameznikov, njihovih pravic do te lastnine in njihove zmožnosti, da bi te pravice z dedovanjem prenašali naprej,
whereas in 2008 the Spanish authorities issued instructions regarding the application of the 1988 Coastal Law, which had been neglected for many years during which time extensive environmental damage was done to coastal areas in Spain; whereas even the current instructions do not provide for clear implementing measures to be followed by the local and regional authorities involved, and whereas many new petitions received bear witness to the retroactive contents of the instructions and the arbitrary destruction and demolition of individuals' legitimately acquired property, their rights to such property and their ability to transfer their rights by means of inheritance,
ker so prizadeti zaradi dejanskega poteka razmejitvene črte dobili vtis, da gre za namerno obremenjevanje nepremičnin, ki so v lasti tujcev, kot na primer na otoku Formentera,
whereas, in view of the actual course of the demarcation line, those affected have formed the strong impression that it has been defined arbitrarily at the expense of foreign owners, for example on the island of Formentera,
ker zakon o obalnih območjih nesorazmerno vpliva na lastnike posameznih nepremičnin, katerih pravice bi morale biti v celoti spoštovane, obenem pa nezadostno vpliva na dejanske krivce za uničevanje obalnih območij, ki so bili v številnih primerih odgovorni za čezmeren urbani razvoj ob obali, vključno s počitniškimi kraji, in ki so se prav gotovo dobro zavedali, da ravnajo v nasprotju z zakonom,
whereas the Coastal Law impacts disproportionately on individual property owners who should have their rights fully respected, and at the same time insufficiently on the real perpetrators of coastal destruction, who have in many instances been responsible for excessive urban developments along the coasts, including holiday resorts, and who had good grounds for knowing that they were invariably acting contrary to the provisions of the law in question,
ker je v tem mandatu Parlamenta Odbor za peticije na podlagi velikega števila prejetih peticij opravil podrobno preiskavo, trikrat poročal o obsegu kršitev zakonitih pravic državljanov EU do njihove zakonito pridobljene lastnine v Španiji in tudi natančno opisal skrbi v zvezi z ogrožanjem trajnostnega razvoja, varstva okolja, kakovosti in preskrbe z vodo, postopki javnih naročil v zvezi z urbanističnimi pogodbami ter nezadostnim nadzorom nad postopki urbanizacije pri številnih lokalnih in regionalnih organih v Španiji Glej zgoraj navedeno resolucijo z dne 21. junija 2007 in resolucjo z dne 13. decembra 2005 o domnevnih zlorabah prostorskega prava Valencije ali Ley Reguladora de la Actividad Urbanistica (LRAU - zakon o razvojnih dejavnostih) in njegovem vplivu na evropske državljane (peticije 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 1112/2002, 107/2004 in druge) (UL C 286 E, 23.11.2006, str.
whereas in the course of the current parliamentary term the Committee on Petitions, acting in response to the very large number of petitions received, has conducted detailed investigations, has reported three times on the extent of the abuse of the legitimate rights of EU citizens to their legally acquired property in Spain, and has also detailed its concerns in relation to the undermining of sustainable development, environmental protection, water quality and provision, procedures concerning public procurement with regard to urbanisation contracts and insufficient control of urbanisation procedures by many local and regional authorities in Spain See the above-mentioned resolution of 21 June 2007 and the resolution of 13 December 2005 on the alleged abuse of the Valencian Land Law or Ley Reguladora de la Actividad Urbanística (LRAU – law on development activities) and its effect on European citizens (Petitions 609/2003, 732/2003, 985/2002, 111272002.
ker je veliko primerov, ko so pristojni organi na vseh ravneh, tako osrednji, avtonomni kot lokalni, odgovorni za uvedbo modela netrajnostnega razvoja, ki je imel zelo hude okoljske, pa tudi socialne in gospodarske posledice,
whereas there are many examples of cases where every level of authority, from central to autonomous and local, has been responsible for setting in motion a model for unsustainable development that has had extremely serious environmental consequences, as well as economic and social repercussions,
ker je Parlament prejel številne peticije od posameznikov in različnih organizacij, ki zastopajo državljane EU, v katerih so se pritožili nad različnimi vidiki urbanistične dejavnosti, ter je ugotovil, da pri številnih problemih, ki so bili v njih navedeni, ne gre za kršenje prava Skupnosti, kot izhaja iz sporočil državam članicam, rešiti pa bi jih bilo treba po pravni poti zadevne države članice,
whereas Parliament has received many petitions from private individuals and from various organisations representing EU citizens, complaining about different aspects of urbanisation, and whereas it has noted that many of the issues raised in the petitions submitted in relation to urban expansion do not constitute infringements of Community law, as is evidenced by the communications to the Member States, and should be settled by exhausting the legal remedies available in the Member States concerned,