natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so v treh državah kandidatkah EU, v Litvi, na Slovaškem in v Bolgariji, obratovale stare jedrske elektrarne, za katere je bilo dogovorjeno, da se zaprejo, pristopna pogajanja pa so privedla do določitve datumov predčasnega zaprtja za enote v zadevnih treh jedrskih elektrarnah,
whereas the three EU candidate countries, Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria, operated old nuclear power plants (NPPs) which were agreed to be closed, and the accession negotiations led to early fixed closure dates for the units in the three NPPs concerned,
ker je EU priznala, da predčasno zaprtje in poznejša razgradnja teh enot v treh jedrskih elektrarnah predstavljata precejšnje finančno in gospodarsko breme, ki ga zadevne države članice ne bi mogle v celoti pokriti, zato je v pristopnih pogodbah in poznejših uredbah Sveta o izvajanju teh pogodb predvidela finančno pomoč za zadevne države članice, vendar ker ni bilo jasno odločeno, ali bi morala pomoč kriti celotne stroške razgradnje ali nadomestila za vse gospodarske posledice; ugotavlja, da tako Bolgarija kot Slovaška ostajata neto izvoznici električne energije,
whereas the EU recognised that the early shut-down and subsequent decommissioning of these units in the three NPPs represented a significant financial and economical burden which could not be fully covered by the Member States concerned, and therefore the Treaties of Accession, as well as subsequent Council Regulations for the implementation of these Treaties, provided for financial assistance to the respective Member States; whereas, however, it was not clearly decided whether the assistance should cover the full cost of decommissioning or compensate for all economic consequences; notes that both Bulgaria and Slovakia for the time being remain net exporters of electricity,
ker ukrepi pomoči zadevajo naslednja področja:
whereas the assistance provides for measures in the following areas:
razgradnja (pripravljalna dela za zaprtje, podpora regulatorju, priprava potrebne dokumentacije za razgradnjo in izdajo licenc, varnost pri vzdrževanju in nadzor po zaprtju, predelava odpadkov, shranjevanje in dekontaminacija odpadkov in izrabljenega goriva ter delo v zvezi z razgradnjo),
decommissioning (preparatory work for shutdown, support to the regulator, drawing up of documentation necessary for decommissioning and licensing, safe maintenance and surveillance after shutdown, waste treatment, waste and spent fuel storage and decontamination, and dismantling work),
energija (modernizacija in okoljska nadgradnja obstoječih objektov, nadomestitev produkcijskih zmogljivosti zaprtih enot, izboljšanje varnosti oskrbe z energijo, izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti ter drugi ukrepi, ki prispevajo k nujnemu prestrukturiranju in posodobitvi energetske infrastrukture),
energy (modernisation and environmental upgrading of existing facilities, replacement of the production capacity of shut-down units, improving security of energy supply and energy efficiency and other measures contributing to the necessary restructuring and upgrading of the energy infrastructure),
socialne posledice (podpora, ki v obdobju po zaprtju in pred razgradnjo uslužbencem elektrarne pomaga vzdrževati visoko raven varnosti in omogoča prekvalificiranje osebja za nove naloge pri razgradnji),
social consequences (support for plant personnel in maintaining a high level of safety in the periods prior to dismantling after closure, and re-training of staff for new tasks in decommissioning),
ker se je pomoč začela pred pridružitvijo in zaprtjem zadevnih enot, so se sredstva nabirala v okviru mednarodnih podpornih skladov za razgradnjo, medtem ko so se upravne priprave nadaljevale,
whereas the assistance started before accession and before the respective units were shut down, and funds accumulated within the International Decommissioning Support Funds (IDSFs) while administrative preparations continued,
ker je razgradnja jedrskih objektov in upravljanje njihovih odpadkov tehnično zapleten postopek, ki zahteva obsežna finančna sredstva, zanj pa je treba prevzeti okoljsko, tehnično, socialno in finančno odgovornost,
whereas the decommissioning of nuclear facilities and the management of their waste is a technically complex operation requiring substantial financial resources and involving environmental, technical, social and financial responsibilities,
ugotavlja, da so Litva, Slovaška in Bolgarija izpolnile svoje obveznosti iz pristopnih pogodb glede pravočasnega zaprtja svojih enot v treh jedrskih elektrarnah: enota 1 jedrske elektrarne Ignalina je bila zaprta 31. decembra 2004, enota 2 pa 31. decembra 2009; enota 1 jedrske elektrarne Bohunice V1 je bila zaprta 31. decembra 2006, enota 2 pa 31. decembra 2008; enoti 1 in 2 jedrske elektrarne Kozloduj sta bili zaprti 31. decembra 2002, enoti 3 in 4 pa 31. decembra 2006;
Notes that Lithuania, Slovakia and Bulgaria have fulfilled their accession treaty commitments to close the respective units in the three NPPs in a timely manner: Ignalina NPP Unit 1 was shut down on 31 December 2004 and Unit 2 on 31 December 2009; Bohunice V1 NPP Unit 1 was shut down on 31 December 2006 and Unit 2 on 31 December 2008; Kozloduy NPP Units 1 and 2 were shut down on 31 December 2002 and Units 3 and 4 on 31 December 2006;
ugotavlja tudi, da so se vse tri države članice poskušale ponovno pogajati o svojih političnih obveznostih glede zapiranja reaktorjev, kar je povzročilo zamude v procesu;
Notes also that all three Member States tried to re-negotiate their political commitments regarding closing the reactors and this led to delays in the process;
ugotavlja, da obstaja pravna podlaga za dodelitev finančne pomoči; je seznanjen, da se zneski vsako leto določijo s sklepom Komisije na podlagi posameznih dokumentov o skupnem letnem načrtovanju, kar omogoča nadzor nad razvojem in financiranjem odobrenih projektov;
Notes the existence of a legal basis for granting the financial assistance; notes that the amounts are established annually through a Commission decision, based on individual annual combined programming documents, permitting control over the development and financing of the approved projects;
ugotavlja, da je bila odločitev o finančni pomoči zaradi omejenih izkušenj in podatkov EU na področju razgradnje sprejeta brez možnosti opredelitve finančne zgornje meje. ugotavlja, da tudi po pripravi načrtov in strategij za razgradnjo še vedno niso bili oblikovani jasni pogoji za določitev zgornjih mej, kar je pomenilo, da je bilo treba o dodatni finančni pomoči odločati na podlagi posameznih faz in primerov;
Notes that due to the limited EU experience and data in the field of decommissioning, the financial assistance was decided without the possibility of defining a financial ceiling; notes that there were still no clear conditions for specification on ceilings even after the plans and strategies for decommissioning had been drawn up, which meant that further financial assistance had to be decided on a stage-by-stage and case-by-case basis;
meni, da je namen pomoči Skupnosti podpora tem trem državam članicam pri obvladovanju finančnega in gospodarskega bremena, ki so ga povzročili določeni datumi predčasnega zaprtja, ter kritje stroškov številnih pomembnih dejavnosti razgradnje, vlaganje v energetske projekte, katerih namen je zmanjšanje energetske odvisnosti, in pomoč pri blaženju socialnih posledic razgradnje elektrarn; vendar ugotavlja, da so v vseh treh primerih stroški razgradnje jedrskih elektrarn prekoračili predvideno pomoč Evropske unije, in da bodo po vsej verjetnosti presegli prvotne ocene; ugotavlja, da je bil visok delež sredstev uporabljen za energetske projekte in ne v podporo glavnemu namenu finančne pomoči, namreč razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn;
Considers that the purpose of the Community assistance is to support these three Member States in coping with the financial and economical burden caused by early fixed closure dates, and to cover the cost of many important decommissioning activities, invest in energy projects with the aim of reducing energy dependency and help to mitigate the social impact of the decommissioning of the power plants; notes, however, that in all three cases the costs for decommissioning of the power plants have exceeded the planned EU assistance, and are also likely to exceed the initial estimates; notes also that a high share of the funds was used for energy projects and not for the main aim of the financial assistance, namely NPP decommissioning;
verjame, da načelo solidarnosti Evropske unije v resnici prispeva k blaženju gospodarskih posledic predčasnega zaprtja v energetskem sektorju; vendar ugotavlja, da je v času priprave tega poročila sama razgradnja še vedno v svoji začetni fazi;
Believes that the concept of European Union solidarity contributes effectively to mitigating the economic consequences of early closure in the energy sector; notes, however, that at the time of preparation of this report, the decommissioning itself is still in its initial stage;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba razgradnji zadevnih jedrskih elektrarn pripisati status najpomembnejše prednostne naloge zaradi varnosti in zdravja vseh evropskih prebivalcev;
Notes that the decommissioning of the nuclear power plants concerned should be assigned the highest priority in the interests of the safety and health of all the people of Europe;
izraža bojazen, da bo pomanjkanje finančnih virov za ukrepe razgradnje povzročilo zamude pri razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn ter ogrozilo okolje in zdravje ljudi;
Fears that a lack of financial resources for decommissioning measures will delay the decommissioning of nuclear power plants and threaten the environment and human health;
poudarja, da je vprašanje varnosti največjega pomena za razgradnjo zadevnih predčasno zaprtih enot v treh jedrskih elektrarnah; zato poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, da to upoštevajo pri vsakem prihodnjem sklepu o razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn na splošno in še zlasti o teh treh programih razgradnje; poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za ustrezno usklajevanje z državami članicami in pripravi natančne časovne razporede za dokončanje projektov;
Stresses that the issue of safety is of the utmost importance for the decommissioning of early closed units in the three NPPs in question; invites, therefore, the Council, the Commission and the Member States to bear that in mind in any future decisions concerning nuclear decommissioning in general and these three decommissioning programmes in particular; calls on the Commission to arrange for adequate coordination with the Member States and to establish precise timetables for the completion of the projects;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da podrobni načrti o razgradnji, ki zadevajo tri zadevne programe razgradnje, še niso dokončno pripravljeni in zaradi tega ni zadostnih podatkov o časovnih okvirih, stroških posameznih projektov ali njihovih virih financiranja; zato odločno poziva ustrezne nacionalne organe, naj dokončajo načrte, Komisijo pa, naj poroča o zadevnem postopku in zagotovi podrobno dolgoročno finančno načrtovanje za projekte razgradnje; poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opiše obseg financiranja EU, ki je potrebno za uresničitev teh načrtov;
Notes with concern that the detailed decommissioning plans of the three decommissioning programmes in question have not yet been finalised and, as a consequence, that there is insufficient information on the timetables, the costs of particular projects, and their sources of funding; urges therefore the relevant national bodies to finalise the plans and the Commission to report on this process and to provide a detailed long-term financial planning of the decommissioning projects; invites the Commission to clearly describe the scope of the EU financing required to accomplish these plans;
poziva Komisijo, naj prouči možnosti za spremembo načinov financiranja operacij razgradnje s strani EU glede na strategije, ki jih uporabljajo države članice, in njihove nacionalne upravne strukture, ter za poenostavitev pravil za upravljanje sredstev, tako da ne bodo vplivala na varnost in zaščito pri operacijah razgradnje;
Calls on the Commission to study ways of altering the EU's methods of financing decommissioning operations in view of the strategies employed in the Member States and their national administrative structures, and simplifying the rules on management of the funds in such a way that they do not affect the safety and security of the decommissioning operations;
opaža pomanjkanje jasne razdelitve odgovornosti med udeleženci pri financiranju in udeleženci pri postopku razgradnje; meni, da bi Komisija morala imeti glavno odgovornost za izplačevanje pomoči EU in da bi bilo treba vzpostaviti skupno upravljanje z Evropsko banko za obnovo in razvoj;
Notes the lack of a clear distribution of responsibility among the participants in the financing and the participants in the process of decommissioning; believes that the Commission should bear the main responsibility for the implementation of the EU assistance and that a joint management with the EBRD should be put in place;
meni, da bi bilo za oddajo naročil zaželeno uporabiti merilo vzajemnosti v korist evropskih podjetij, zlasti z uporabo načel iz člena 58 Direktive 2004/17/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil naročnikov, med drugim v energetskem sektorju;
Considers that, for the purpose of awarding contracts, it would be desirable to apply a criterion of Community reciprocity for the benefit of European enterprises, with the application in particular of the principles set forth in Article 58 of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating, inter alia, in the energy sector;
ugotavlja, da bo skupna finančna pomoč Evropske unije za tri države članice do konca leta 2013 dosegla 2.847,78 milijona EUR; poudarja, da čeprav obstajajo razlike med jedrskimi elektrarnami, zlasti kar zadeva skladiščenje goriva, programi načeloma uporabljajo enako tehnologijo; vendar ugotavlja, da se dodeljeni zneski precej razlikujejo: Ignalina (2 enoti) 1.367 milijonov EUR; Bohunice (2 enoti): 613 milijonov EUR; in Kozloduj (4 enote) 867,78 milijona EUR;
Notes that the total financial assistance from the European Union to the three Member States until the end of 2013 comes to EUR 2 847.78 million; points out that, although differences among the NPPs exist, especially as regards fuel storage, in principle the programmes share the same technology; notes, however, that there are considerable differences in the allocated amounts: Ignalina (2 units) EUR 1 367 million; Bohunice (2 units ): EUR 613 million; and Kozloduy (4 units) EUR 867.78 million;
ugotavlja, v skladu s podatki, ki so bili na voljo konec leta 2009, različen položaj držav članic glede na izplačane zneske: Ignalina: skupaj 1.367 milijonov EUR, prevzetih obveznosti za 875,5 milijona EUR (64,04 %), izplačanih 760,4 milijona EUR (55,62 %); Bohunice skupaj 613 milijonov EUR, prevzetih obveznosti za 363,72 milijona EUR (59,33 %), izplačanih 157,87 milijona EUR (25,75 %); Kozloduj: skupaj 867,78 milijona EUR, prevzetih obveznosti za 567,78 milijona EUR (65,42 %), izplačanih 363,149 milijona EUR (41,84 %), v pretežni meri zaradi različnih časovnih načrtov zapiranja;
Notes, according to data available at the end of 2009, the differing situations among the Member States regarding the amounts disbursed:,Ignalina: total EUR 1 367 million, committed EUR 875.5 million (64.04 %), disbursed EUR 760.4 million (55.62%); Bohunice: total EUR 613 million, committed EUR 363.72 million (59.33 %), disbursed EUR 157.87 million (25.75 %); Kozloduy: total EUR 867.78 million, committed EUR 567.78 million (65.42 %), disbursed EUR 363.149 million (41.84%), mostly due to the different timing of the closure;
meni, da je treba poskrbeti za popolno preglednost upravljanja skladov in uporabe njihovih sredstev; priznava pomen dobrega in preglednega upravljanja finančnih sredstev z ustreznim zunanjim nadzorom za zagotovitev pravične konkurence na energetskem trgu; na tem področju priporoča preglednost in javno sodelovanje;
Considers it necessary for the funds to be managed and their resources to be used with absolute transparency; recognises the importance of sound and transparent management of financial resources, with appropriate external supervision, to ensure fair competition on the energy market; recommends transparency and public participation in this field;
je seznanjen z naslednjimi zaključenimi revizijami in ocenami: „Vmesna ocena pomoči Litvi in Slovaški pri razgradnji“ (2007); notranje revizije ES vseh treh programov leta 2007; reviziji CPMA, ki ju je v zvezi z Ignalino opravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče (ERS) leta 2008 in leta 2009; revizija ERS za pripravo pozitivne izjave o zanesljivosti za leto 2008; študija ERS o izvedljivosti leta 2009; ter je seznanjen z naslednjimi tekočimi dejavnostmi: sporočilo Komisije, pričakovano v začetku leta 2011; zunanja finančna revizija ES za BISDF; celovita revizija uspešnosti za vse tri programe, ki jo opravi ERS;
Takes note of the following completed audits and evaluations: ‘Midterm Evaluation of the Decommissioning Assistance to Lithuania and Slovakia’ (2007); EC internal audits of all three programmes in 2007; European Court of Auditors (ECA) audits of CPMA in 2008 and 2009 regarding Ignalina; ECA audit for preparation of DAS 2008; ECA feasibility study in 2009; and notes the following ongoing activities: Communication from the Commission expected in early 2011; EC external financial audit for BIDSF, ECA; full performance audit for all three programmes;
meni, da je število in obseg opravljenih revizij nezadostno ob upoštevanju velikih denarnih zneskov, novosti v zvezi z uporabo sredstev, neznanih dejavnikov, ki so se pojavili med postopkom in so jim sledili številne spremembe, prilagoditve in dodelitev dodatnih zneskov; izraža obžalovanje, da vmesna ocena pomoči za razgradnjo, dodeljene Litvi in Slovaški, ki jo je septembra 2007 izvedla Komisija, ni zajela Bolgarije (ki je takrat že prejemala pomoč);
Considers that, taking into account the large amounts of money involved, the novelty regarding the utilisation of funds, the unknown factors which emerged throughout the process, and the numerous subsequent alterations, adaptations and allocation of additional amounts, the number and scope of the audits performed appear to be insufficient; regrets that the Commission's September 2007 Mid-term evaluation of the decommissioning assistance to Lithuania and Slovakia did not cover Bulgaria ( which was already receiving assistance at the time);
obžaluje, da Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu ni predložila letnih poročil o uporabi finančnih sredstev, namenjenih razgradnji jedrskih elektrarn; zato poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja in letno poroča Parlamentu o izboljšavah pri uporabi sredstev in verjetnosti, da bodo zbrana sredstva za razgradnjo teh posebnih enot v treh jedrskih elektrarnah porabljena v naslednjih treh letih;
Regrets the lack of annual reports from the Commission to the European Parliament on the use of financial resources earmarked for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants; calls therefore on the Commission to monitor and report annually to the Parliament on the improvements in use of the funds and on the likelihood that the accumulated funds for the decommissioning of these specific units in the three NPPs will be absorbed over the next three years;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede analizo, da bi preverila, ali obstaja možnost dodeljevanja sredstev za prihodnje projekte razgradnje do leta 2013, zlasti ker bodo dovoljenja za razgradnjo izdana julija 2011 za Bohunice in konec leta 2011 ter konec leta 2012 za Kozloduj;
Invites the Commission to conduct an analysis in order to ascertain that the possibility of allocating amounts for upcoming decommissioning projects until 2013 exists, especially since the decommissioning licences will be released for Bohunice in July 2011 and for Kozloduy at the end of 2011 and the end of 2012;
poziva Komisijo, naj pred kakršnokoli nadaljnjo dodelitvijo sredstev EU zagotovi primerjalne informacije o izvedbi prvotnega in spremenjenega časovnega načrta za različne faze postopkov razgradnje ter o ukrepih na energetskem in socialnem področju;
Invites the Commission to provide comparative information on the implementation of the initial and revised schedules for different stages of the decommissioning processes, as well as on measures in the energy and social domains, prior to any further allocation of EU funds;
poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o posebnih izboljšavah po ustanovitvi upravnega odbora države članice leta 2007, da bi Komisiji zagotavljal pomoč pri izvajanju programov pomoči, ter poroča o postopkovnih spremembah, ki so se od takrat pojavile;
Invites the Commission to report on the particular improvements stemming from the establishment of a Member State Management Committee in 2007 to assist it in the implementation of the assistance programmes, and to give an account of the procedural changes since that time;
ugotavlja, da revizija ERS še vedno poteka; domneva, da bi ta ocena morala pomagati razkriti cilje uporabe sredstev in njihovo učinkovitost ter izvedljive predloge za prihodnost, kakor tudi oceniti potrebno dodatno financiranje za izvedbo razgradnje; predlaga, da mora ta revizija kot celovita revizija uspešnosti pojasniti naslednje:
Notes that the ECA audit is still ongoing; suggests that this should help to reveal the objectives of the use of the funds and their effectiveness, as well as viable proposals for the future, and assess the additional funding required in order to perform the decommissioning; suggests that, being a full performance audit, it should clarify the following:
ali so bila sredstva uporabljena za namene, za katere so bila dodeljena,
whether the funds were used for the purposes for which they were intended,
ali so bili postopki javnih naročil ustrezno pripravljeni in spoštovani,
whether procurement procedures were properly drawn up and respected,
ali je dodeljeni denar prispeval k povečanju varnosti pri dejavnosti razgradnje,
whether the money allocated contributed to increasing safety in the decommissioning activity;
ali so postopki javnih naročil zagotovili, da bodo udeležena podjetja zagotovila varnost po standardih EU,
whether the procurement procedures ensured that the companies involved will provide safety to EU standards,
ali obstajajo dejavnosti, pri katerih je udeležen OLAF,
whether there are activities where OLAF is involved,
ali je med tremi obstoječimi programi potekalo ustrezno usklajevanje, da bi učinkovito uporabili pridobljene izkušnje in predhodno pripravljene ter financirane projekte, v katerih vidikih so se programi za razgradnjo prekrivali (na primer obstaja več podobnih projektov v zvezi s skladiščenjem, usposobljenostjo osebja itd., ki bi jih lahko prilagodili glede na posamezno JE, kar bi omogočilo prihranke);
whether proper coordination among the three existing programmes occurred, in order to make efficient use of experience gained and of previously prepared and financed projects, and in what regards the decommissioning programmes overlapped (given, for example, that there are several similar projects related to storage, personnel qualification, etc which could have been adapted from one NPP to another, leading to savings);
predlaga, v zvezi s prihodnjimi dejavnostmi, ki se bodo financirale iz dodeljenih zneskov EU v obdobju 2007–2013, da je treba pojasniti naslednja vprašanja:
Suggests that, as regards future activities to be financed from EU allocated amounts within the 2007-2013 period, further issues need clarifying:
ali so že obstoječi načrti in strategije zaključeni ter ali še vedno obstaja možnost dodajanja novih dejavnosti in posledično dodatnih sredstev,
whether the already existing plans and strategies are complete or whether the possibility of adding new activities and subsequently additional funds still exists,
ali so celotne zmogljivosti za začasno skladiščenje in postopek izbire končnega domačega odlagališča za končne radioaktivne odpadke zaključeni ali ne,
whether the overall temporary storage capacity, and a procedure to select a final domestic disposal site for final radioactive waste, are complete or not,