natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Spoštovani poslanci niso predložili dodatnih informacij, na podlagi katerih bi lahko spremenili to oceno.
The Honourable Members do not provide additional information which would give reason to modify this assessment.
Člen 1 Direktive 2008/98/ES o odpadkih UL L 312, 22.11.2008 . določa vsebino in področje uporabe nove okvirne direktive o odpadkih, člen 3 pa zagotavlja pravne opredelitve.
Article 1 of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste OJ L 312, 22.11.2008. outlines the subject matter and scope of the new Waste Framework Directive and Article 3 provides legal definitions.
Projekt, ki ga omenjajo spoštovani poslanci, ne krši teh določb.
These provisions are not violated by the project mentioned by the Honourable Members.
Direktiva 2000/76/ES o sežiganju odpadkov določa sežiganje odpadkov za eno od najstrožje reguliranih in nadzorovanih industrijskih dejavnosti.
Directive 2000/76/EC on the incineration of waste makes the incineration of waste one of the most stringently regulated and controlled industrial activities.
Za izvajanje in izvrševanje te direktive, vključno z ustreznimi okoljskimi pregledi objektov, so odgovorne države članice.
Its implementation and enforcement, including appropriate environmental inspections of the installations, fall under the responsibility of Member States.
Na podlagi informacij, predloženih z navedeno peticijo, bi objekt spadal na področje direktive o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja (Direktiva 2008/1/ES).
Based on the information submitted with the aforementioned petition, the installation would fall under the scope of the IPPC Directive (Directive 2008/1/EC).
Ta direktiva zahteva, da objekti, ki spadajo znotraj njenega področja uporabe, delujejo v skladu z dovoljenji, kar vključuje tudi mejne vrednosti emisij, ki se določijo na podlagi najboljših razpoložljivih tehnik, oblikovanih za preprečevanje in, kadar to ni izvedljivo, zmanjševanje emisij in vpliva na okolje kot celoto.
This directive requires installations falling under its scope to operate in accordance with permits including emission limit values based on the best available techniques (BAT), designed to prevent and, where that is not practicable, generally to reduce emissions and the impact to the environment as a whole.
Najboljše razpoložljive tehnike se določijo na podlagi meril iz priloge IV k direktivi o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja.
The best available techniques have to be determined on the basis of criteria set out in Annex IV to the IPPC Directive.
Preprečevanje ali zmanjševanje emisij v zrak, vodo in tla je treba urejati z okoljskimi dovoljenji, izdanimi v skladu z direktivo o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja.
The prevention or reduction of emissions to air, water and soil should therefore be dealt with in the environmental permits issued in accordance with the IPPC Directive.
V zvezi s kakovostjo zunanjega zraka člen 25 Direktive 2008/50/ES zahteva, da države članice sodelujejo in, kadar je to ustrezno, pripravijo skupne dejavnosti za odpravo preseganj, kadar se ta pojavljajo zaradi precejšnjega onesnaževanja, ki izvira iz druge države članice.
As regards the ambient air quality, Article 25 of Directive 2008/50/EC requires that Member States cooperate, and when appropriate, draw up joint activities in order to remove exceedances where such are occurring due to significant pollution originating in another State.
Za emisije, ki bodo nastale v prihodnosti, takšna obveznost za sodelovanje ne velja.
There is no such obligation for cooperation in respect of emissions that will only arise in the future.
Poleg tega je območje kakovosti zraka „HU0010“, ki se nahaja blizu avstrijske meje, po najnovejših uradnih madžarskih podatkih v skladu z mejnimi vrednostmi PM 10 .
Furthermore the air quality zone ‘HU0010’ which is located close to the Austrian border, complies with the PM 10 limit values according to the latest official Hungarian data.
Dovoljenje, ki je bilo izdano za objekt Begas 5. februarja 2009, trenutno pregleduje avstrijski okoljski odbor, ki je v okviru pritožbenega postopka zaprosil za več dopolnilnih študij.
The permit which was issued for the Begas facility on 5 February 2009 is currently under scrutiny of the Austrian Environmental Senat, which has asked for several complementary studies in the context of the appeal procedure.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-2633/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2633/10
vlagajo Isabella Lövin (Verts/ALE) , Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE) , Jill Evans (Verts/ALE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Francisco Sosa Wagner (NI) , Willy Meyer (GUE/NGL) , Ana Gomes (S&D) in Åsa Westlund (S&D)
by Isabella Lövin (Verts/ALE) , Raül Romeva i Rueda (Verts/ALE) , Jill Evans (Verts/ALE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Francisco Sosa Wagner (NI) , Willy Meyer (GUE/NGL) , Ana Gomes (S&D) and Åsa Westlund (S&D)
Zadeva: Želje Saharcev
Subject: Wishes of the Saharawi people
Leta 2002 je podsekretar Združenih narodov za pravne zadeve Hans Corell pripravil pomembno mnenje o zakonitosti iskanja in izkoriščanja rudnin v zasedenih območjih Zahodne Sahare.
In 2002, the UN Under-Secretary-General for Legal Affairs, Hans Corell, wrote an important opinion on the legality of mineral exploration and exploitation in the occupied territories of the Western Sahara.
Njegovi sklepi veljajo tudi za izkoriščanje ribolovnih virov.
Its conclusions apply equally to the exploitation of fisheries resources.
Njegov zadnji stavek se je glasil, da „če se bodo raziskave in izkoriščanje nadaljevale ne glede na interese in želje prebivalcev Zahodne Sahare, bo to pomenilo kršenje načel mednarodnega prava, veljavnih za dejavnosti z mineralnimi viri na nesamoupravnih ozemljih.“
The concluding sentence of the opinion states that ‘… if further exploration and exploitation activities were to proceed in disregard of the interests and wishes of the people of Western Sahara, they would be in violation of the principles of international law applicable to mineral resource activities in Non-Self-Governing Territories.’
Mednarodno pravo torej zahteva, da se pred kakršnim koli izkoriščanjem naravnih virov vedno upoštevajo želje prebivalcev Zahodne Sahare.
In short, international law requires that the wishes of the people of the Western Sahara must be taken into account before resource exploitation can proceed.
Prebivalci Zahodne Sahare so prek gibanja Polisario, ki deluje kot njihov mednarodno priznani zastopnik, že večkrat izrazili izrecno nasprotovanje vključitvi morja ob Zahodni Sahari v sporazum o ribištvu med EU in Marokom, in sicer: —
On several occasions, the people of the Western Sahara, through their internationally recognised representative, the Polisario Front, have expressed their very explicit opposition to the inclusion of the waters off Western Sahara in the EU‑Morocco fisheries agreement, through: —
s pismom gibanja Polisario komisarju Borgu maja 2005, —
a letter from Polisario to Commissioner Borg of May 2005; —
s pismom gibanja Polisario Tonyju Blairu, predsedujočemu Svetu, septembra 2005, —
a letter from Polisario to Tony Blair, President of the Council, of September 2005; —
s pismom 25 organizacij saharske civilne družbe komisarju Borgu decembra 2009, —
a letter from 25 Saharawi civil society organisations to Commissioner Borg of 30 December 2009; —
s pismom gibanja Polisario komisarju Damanakiju 1. marca 2010.
a letter from Polisario to Commissioner Damanaki of 1 March 2010.
Komisija uradno sprejema Corellijevo mnenje.
The Commission is on record as accepting the Corell opinion.
Ali lahko Komisija navede, s katerimi dokumenti ali drugimi dokazi lahko dokaže, da je vsebina in samo izvajanje trenutnega sporazuma o ribištvu v skladu z željami prebivalcev Zahodne Sahare?
Could the Commission please state what documents or other evidence it has to demonstrate that the current fisheries agreement has been negotiated and implemented in a manner that is consistent with the wishes of the people of Western Sahara?
S kom se je Komisija posvetovala in ali je še na kakšen drug način poskušala pridobiti soglasje prebivalcev Zahodne Sahare?
Who has the Commission consulted and what other attempts has the Commission made to obtain the agreement of the people of the Western Sahara?
Ali se je Komisija o ribiškem sporazumu med EU in Marokom kdaj posvetovala z gibanjem Polisario in, če se je, do kakšnih zaključkov je prišla?
Has the Commission ever consulted Polisario on the EU‑Morocco fisheries agreement and, if so, what were the conclusions?
Odgovor Marie Damanaki v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Ms Damanaki on behalf of the Commission
(21. junij 2010)
(21 June 2010)
V odgovor na vprašanje spoštovanih članov v zvezi s Sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju (FPA) med Marokom in EU, Komisija pojasnjuje:
In response to the question of the Honourable Members on the Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) between Morocco and the EU, the Commission would like to provide the following clarifications:
Kot poročajo spoštovani poslanci, mnenje Hansa Corella, podsekretarja Združenih narodov za pravne zadeve, potrjuje, da je na nesamoupravnih ozemljih, kot je Zahodna Sahara, „treba naravne vire izkoriščati glede na interese prebivalcev teh ozemelj, v njihovem imenu ter po posvetovanju z njihovimi predstavniki“.
As referred to by the Honourable Members, the UN Corell opinion confirms that in a non-self governing territory, as is the case of the Western Sahara, exploitation activities should be carried out ‘for the benefit of the peoples of those Territories, on their behalf or in consultation with their representatives’.
Komisija meni, da je odgovornost Maroka, da to zagotovi.
The Commission is of the view that it is Morocco's responsibility to ensure that this is the case.
Komisija se sicer lahko odloči vzpostaviti stike z drugimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, vendar nikakor ne sme namesto Maroka opravljati dolžnosti te države.
While the Commission may choose to have contacts with other parties, it is not by any means possible for the Commission to substitute itself to Morocco in exercising its responsibilities.
Na zadnjem sestanku skupnega odbora EU-Maroko je Komisija zahtevala dodatne informacije v zvezi z družbeno-gospodarskimi vplivi ribolovnih aktivnosti in podporo, ki jo za ta sektor predvideva Sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju (FPA).
During the last meeting of the Joint Committee with Morocco, the Commission requested additional information about the socioeconomic effects of the fishing activities and the sector support foreseen by the FPA.
Komisija do zdaj še ni prejela zahtevanih informacij.
The Commission has not received such information yet.
Glede na te informacije oziroma njihovo nerazpoložljivost bo sprejemala prihodnje odločitve in proučila možnost podaljšanja iztekajočega se protokola.
This information or lack thereof will feed into its decision-making process regarding its future decisions and the possibility of a renewal of the expiring protocol.
Še vedno pa je mnenja, da imajo lahko dejavnosti, ki se izvajajo v Zahodni Sahari v okviru Sporazuma, pozitiven vpliv na gospodarstvo Zahodne Sahare, na primer z iztovarjanjem ulova, vkrcavanjem tamkajšnjih domačinov in uporabo lokalnih pristanišč.
In the meantime, the Commission remains of the view that the activities implemented in the framework of the Agreement in the Western Sahara may have a positive effect on the Western Sahara economy, for example through landing of catches, embarkation of local seamen, and use of local ports.
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-3249/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-3249/10
vlaga Jelko Kacin (ALDE)
by Jelko Kacin (ALDE)
Zadeva: Zahodni Balkan: polna kumulacija
Subject: Western Balkans: full cumulation
Ali bi lahko Komisija glede na to, da je eden od ciljev EU okrepiti regionalno trgovinsko povezovanje s spodbujanjem trgovine in proizvodne verige med regionalnimi partnerji, in ob upoštevanju ratifikacije stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenih sporazumov (SPS) in začasnih sporazumov v državah jugovzhodne Evrope, vključno z njihovim članstvom v Srednjeevropskem sporazumu o prosti trgovini (CEFTA), odgovorila na naslednja vprašanja: 1.
Bearing in mind that one of the EU’s objectives is to enhance regional trade integration by encouraging trade and the production chain between regional partners, and having regard to the ratification of stabilisation and association agreements (SAAs) and interim agreements by the countries of South-East Europe, including their membership in the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), would the Commission answer the following questions: 1.
Trenutno se izvaja polna kumulacija med EU in evropskim gospodarskim prostorom (EGP), državami Magreba, čezmorskimi državami in ozemlji ter skupino afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP).
Currently, the EU has full cumulation with the European Economic Area (EEA), Maghreb, overseas countries and territories (OCT) and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP).
Ali Komisija razmišlja o razširitvi polne kumulacije na države jugovzhodne Evrope? 2.
Is the Commission considering extending full cumulation to the countries of South-East Europe? 2.
Če da, kaj ovira zagotovitev polne kumulacije z Zahodnim Balkanom? 3.
If so, what are the obstacles to ensuring full cumulation with the western Balkans? 3.
Ali je treba pred sprožitvijo pobude za polno kumulacijo temeljito preučiti njene prednosti in slabosti za Zahodni Balkan in EU?
Is there a necessity to conduct in-depth studies on advantages and disadvantages of full cumulation for the western Balkans and the EU before launching an initiative for full cumulation?
Če da, koliko časa bo predvidoma potrebnega za izvedbo take študije?
If so, what is the expected time necessary for finalising the study?
Šemete v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Šemeta on behalf of the Commission
(30. junij 2010)
(30 June 2010)
Polna kumulacija pogodbenicam območij proste trgovine omogoča, da obdelavo in predelavo materialov brez porekla v katerikoli državi območja kumulacije štejejo za izvedeno v tej pogodbenici sami.
Full cumulation allows a Party to a free trade area to consider working or processing on non-originating materials carried out in any country of the cumulation area as carried out in that Party.
Polna kumulacija pomeni, da se pri ocenjevanju končnega porekla upoštevajo vsi postopki, izvedeni v sodelujočih državah.
Full cumulation means that all operations carried out in the participating countries are taken into account when assessing the final origin.
Omeniti velja, da se polna kumulacija lahko izvaja le med državami, ki imajo pravila o poreklu, ki omogočajo medsebojno polno kumulacijo.
It is worthwhile to mention that full cumulation can operate only among the countries which have rules of origin allowing for full cumulation between them.
Kot je poslanec pravilno navedel, EU izvaja polno kumulacijo z evropskim gospodarskim prostorom (EGP), državami Magreba, čezmorskimi državami in ozemlji ter skupino afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP).
As the Honourable Member rightly mentioned, the EU applies full cumulation within the European Economic Area (EEA), with Maghreb, with Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) and with the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States (ACP).
Zahodni Balkan pokriva stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni proces Evropske unije (SPP).
Western Balkans are covered by the European Union's Stabilisation and Association process (SAP).
Ta državam partnericam v SPP omogoča koriščenje sistema t.i. „diagonalne kumulacije SPP“, ki je vzpostavljen med EU, partnericami SPP in Turčijo Za blago, ki je zajeto v carinsko unijo med ES in Turčijo. .
This allows SAP partner countries to benefit from the system of so-called ‘SAP diagonal cumulation’ operating among the EU, SAP partners and Turkey For goods covered by the EC-Turkey customs union. .
Hrvaška tega sistema ne more izkoriščati, saj se je ob njegovi vzpostavitvi odločila, da v njem ne bo sodelovala.
Croatia is currently not benefiting from this system as it decided not to be part of it when it was created.
Komisija se je v salzburškem sporočilu iz leta 2006 zavezala k razširitvi trenutnega vseevropsko-sredozemskega sistema diagonalne kumulacije na zahodni Balkan (vključno s Hrvaško).
In the Salzburg Communication of 2006 the Commission committed to extend the current pan-Euro-Mediterranean system of diagonal cumulation to the western Balkans (Croatia included).
S tem bi zahodni Balkan pridobil razširjene možnosti kumulacije z drugimi trgovinskimi partnericami, zlasti z državami Evropskega združenja za prosto trgovino (EFTA).
This would allow the western Balkans to benefit from extended cumulation possibilities with other trade partners, most notably with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) States.
Komisija je v zadnjih letih v ta proces vložila velike napore.
Over the last few years the Commission has put significant efforts into this process.
Za razširitev bodo morale vse države vseevropsko-sredozemskega območja, vključno z državami zahodnega Balkana, sprejeti/ratificirati regionalno konvencijo o vseevropsko-sredozemskih preferencialnih pravilih o poreklu.
This extension will be achieved through the adoption/ratification of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin by all the countries of the pan-Euro-Mediterranean zone including the western Balkans.
Kot je morda poslanec že obveščen, se vse pogodbenice konvencije (vključno z državami zahodnega Balkana) udeležujejo razprav o reviziji pravil o poreklu, ki so določena v konvenciji.
As the Honourable Member may be aware, all parties to the Convention (Western Balkans included) are already engaged in the discussions on the revision of the rules of origin as provided for in the Convention.
To je večstranski okvir, preko katerega lahko države zahodnega Balkana zaprosijo za vključitev v sistem polne kumulacije porekla.
This is the multilateral framework where Western Balkans could request to be included in the system of full cumulation of origin.
Prednosti in slabosti razširitve sistema bi se nato proučile v samem postopku revizije.
The advantages and disadvantages of extending the system would then be considered in the revision exercise.
Komisija bi morebitno tovrstno prošnjo podprla ob predpostavki, da bi polna kumulacija koristila celotni regiji zahodnega Balkana.
The Commission may support such request if it is made, on the assumption that full cumulation would be advantageous for the entire Western Balkans region.
Vendar morajo vsako odločitev o razširitvi polne kumulacije na države zahodnega Balkana odobriti tudi vse ostale partnerice.
However, any decision to extend full cumulation to the western Balkans needs to be approved by all other partners as well.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-5049/2010
Question for written answer E-5049/2010
(2. julij 2010)
(2 July 2010)
Zadeva: Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena sporazuma s Hrvaško in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo: dostop do trga dela za zakonca in otroke delavca, ki je zakonito zaposlen na ozemlju države članice
Subject: Croatia and FYROM SAAs: Access to labour market for the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State
Glede na to, da sta stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena sporazuma, sklenjena med EU in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo ter med EU in Hrvaško, začela veljati, opozarjam Svet, da člen 45 stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Hrvaško in EU med drugim določa Enako velja za člen 44 stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma med Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo in EU. :
Bearing in mind that the Stabilisation and Association Agreements (SAAs) between the EU and FYROM and the EU and Croatia have entered into force, would the Council please note the following: Article 45 of the SAA between the Republic of Croatia of the one part and the EU of the other part reads The same applies to Article 44 of the SAA between FYROM and the EU. , inter alia :
zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, z izjemo sezonskih delavcev in delavcev, ki prihajajo na delo v državo na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov v smislu člena 46, razen če v takšnih sporazumih ni drugače predvideno, imajo dostop do trga dela te države članice v času, ko ima ta delavec dovoljenje za bivanje zaradi dela v tej državi .“
the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State, with the exception of seasonal workers and of workers coming under bilateral agreements within the meaning of Article 46, unless otherwise provided by such agreements, shall have access to the labour market of that Member State, during the period of that worker's authorised stay of employment .’
Ob upoštevanju razlage besedne zveze „dostop do trga dela“ v zakonodaji EU naj bi to pomenilo, da delovno dovoljenje ni potrebno.
Given the interpretation of the term ‘access to the labour market’ in EU legislation, this is understood to mean that no work permits are necessary.
V tem kontekstu druga alinea člena 45(1), katere vsebina je jasna, natančna in torej najverjetneje neposredno uporabljiva, omogoča sklep, da zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, z izjemo sezonskih delavcev in delavcev, ki prihajajo na delo v državo na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov v skladu s členom 46, razen če ni v takšnih sporazumih predvideno drugače, imajo dostop do trga dela te države članice in jim v tej državi ni treba pridobiti delovnega dovoljenja.
In this context the second indent of Article 45(1), being clear, precise and therefore most likely directly applicable, would entail that the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State, with the exception of seasonal workers and of workers coming under bilateral agreements within the meaning of Article 46, unless otherwise provided by such agreements, shall have access to the labour market of that Member State and should not be obliged to acquire work permits in that Member State.
Vendar člen 45(1) določa, da za pravice zakonca in otrok delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, veljajo pogoji in postopki, ki se uporabljajo v posamezni državi članici.
However, Article 45(1) implies that the rights of the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State are subject to the conditions and modalities applicable in each Member State.
Iz tega razloga se zdita navedeni določbi istega člena izključujoči.
Therefore the two provisions of the same article seemingly have a contradictory meaning.
Če se sprejeme razlaga, da člen 45(1) določa, da lahko države članice za zgoraj navedene osebe uporabijo postopke za izdajo delovnih dovoljenj, se s tem razveljavi pravica, navedena v drugi alinei istega člena.
If Article 45(1) is accepted to mean that Member States have the right to apply work permit procedures to the abovementioned persons, this would invalidate the right given in the second indent of Article 45(1).
Ali lahko Svet natančneje razloži, katere so pravice in omejitve, ki jih določa navedeni člen, v kontekstu delovnih dovoljenj?
Could the Council give a more precise explanation of the rights and limitations of the article concerned in the context of work permits?
Če je ključno določilo „ob upoštevanju pogojev in postopkov, ki se uporabljajo v posamezni državi članici“, kakšna je potemtakem dejanska vrednost, namen in pravica, ki izhaja iz druge alinee člena 45(1) in ki je zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ne bi imeli, če člen 45(1), druga alinea, ne bi obstajal?
If the qualifier (‘subject to the conditions and modalities applicable in each Member State’) is decisive, what is then the real value, purpose and the actual right stemming from the second indent of Article 45(1) which the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State would not have in the absence of Article 45(1), second indent?