natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ta predlog spremembe vključuje veljavna merila, kakor so opredeljena z Odločbo Komisije 98/433/ES z dne 26. junija 1998.
This amendment includes the existing criteria as specified in Commission decision 98/433/EC of 26 June 2008.
Komisija lahko predloži predlog za nova merila, tako da se bodo še lahko vključila v temeljni akt.
The Commission is invited to come forward with a proposal for new criteria, so that they can still be included in the basic act.
V večjih industrijskih nesrečah, kot so nesreče v Sevesu (Italija, 1976), Bhopalu (Indija, 1984), Schweizerhallu (Švica, 1986), Enschedeju (Nizozemska, 2000), Toulousu (Francija, 2001) in Buncefieldu (Združeno kraljestvo, 2005), je življenje izgubilo mnogo ljudi, uničena je bila javna in zasebna lastnina in povzročena okoljska škoda, katere posledica so bili milijardni stroški.
Major industrial accidents, such as the accidents in Seveso (Italy, 1976) , Bhopal (India, 1984), Schweizerhalle (Switzerland, 1986), Enschede (Netherlands, 2000), Toulouse (France, 2001) and Buncefield (United Kingdom, 2005), have taken many lives, destroyed public and private properties and damaged the environment, resulting in costs up to billions of euro.
Da bi zmanjšali verjetnost takih nesreč in njihove posledice, so v EU najprej sprejeli Direktivo 82/501/EGS (direktiva Seveso I), pozneje pa sedanjo Direktivo 96/82/ES (direktiva Seveso II), spremenjeno z Direktivo 2003/105/ES, ki zajema približno 10 000 organizacij, v katerih so prisotne nevarne snovi (ali njihove zmesi) v dovolj velikih količinah, da predstavljajo nevarnost večjih nesreč.
To reduce the likelihood and the consequences of such accidents the EU first adopted Directive 82/501/EEC (Seveso I Directive) and later the current Directive 96/82/EC (Seveso II Directive; amended by Directive 2003/105/EC, covering around 10.000 establishments where dangerous substances (or mixtures thereof) are present in sufficiently large quantities to create a major-accident hazard .
Po direktivi so upravljavci in organi držav članic dolžni preprečiti nesreče in omejiti njihove posledice.
It contains obligations on operators and the Member States' authorities to prevent accidents and to limit their consequences.
Raven obveznosti upravljavcev se ureja z večstopenjskim pristopom, za katerega velja, da večje ko so količine snovi, strožja so pravila.
There is a tiered approach to the level of obligations on the operators, with the larger the quantities of substances the stricter the rules.
Vsi upravljavci organizacij iz področja uporabe te direktive morajo pristojnim organom poslati priglasitev in uvesti politiko preprečevanja večjih nesreč.
All operators of establishments under the scope of the directive need to send notification to the competent authority and to establish a major accident prevention policy .
Upravljavci tako imenovanih organizacij višje stopnje morajo poleg tega poskrbeti za varnostno poročilo, sistem upravljanja varnosti in načrt ukrepov ob nesrečah.
In addition operators of so called "upper tier establishments" need to establish a safety report , a safety management system and an emergency plan .
Zakaj je treba revidirati direktivo Seveso II?
Why should the Seveso II Directive be revised?
EU z uredbo CLP (Uredba (ES) št. 1272/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi) izvaja globalno usklajeni sistem Združenih narodov za razvrščanje in označevanje kemikalij.
The EU’s CLP Regulation (Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of dangerous substances and mixtures), implements the United Nations' Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
Nova pravila te uredbe bodo dokončno veljavna 1. junija 2015.
The new CLP rules will become definitive with effect from 1 June 2015 .
V Prilogi I k direktivi Seveso II je seznam nevarnih snovi, ki spadajo v njeno področje uporabe, kar se navezuje na določbe o razvrstitvi iz predhodnih direktiv 67/548/EGS in 1999/45/ES.
Annex I to the Seveso II Directive lists the dangerous substances falling within its scope, which refers to provisions of the earlier 'classification Directives' 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC.
Ker je uredba CLP nadomestila te direktive, je torej vključitev novih pravil uredbe CLP v direktivo Seveso II vprašanje podrejene zakonodaje.
Since the CLP Regulation replaces these Directives , the integration of the new CLP rules into the Seveso II Directive is hence a downstream legislation issue.
Pristop, ki ga je sprejela Komisija
The approach adopted by the Commission
Komisija se je leta 2008 zaradi potrebe po uskladitvi z uredbo CLP odločila za splošnejšo revizijo direktive Seveso.
In the light of the needed CLP alignment, the Commission decided in 2008 to launch a wider review of the Seveso Directive .
Na podlagi te revizije je ugotovila, da veljavne določbe na splošno ustrezajo svojemu namenu in da niso potrebne velike spremembe v zvezi z osnovno strukturo in glavnimi določbami.
On the basis of this review the Commission concluded that overall the existing provisions are fit for purpose and that no major changes regarding the basic structure and the main provisions are required .
Predlagala pa je znatne spremembe v zvezi z izvajanjem Aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah ter v zvezi z vse večjo uporabe interneta.
The Commission did however propose substantial changes related to the implementation of the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice in environmental matters and to the increasing use of the internet .
Predlagala je tudi okrepitev obstoječih zahtev v zvezi z inšpekcijskimi pregledi.
Furthermore the Commission proposed to strengthen the existing requirements in relation to inspections .
Poročevalec se je pri predlaganju sprememb k predlogu Komisije zgledoval po naslednjih glavnih načelih:
For his amendments to the Commission proposal the Rapporteur used the following guiding principles:
- revizija je potrebna zaradi zahtevane uskladitve z uredbo CLP;
- The revision is necessary because of the required alignment to the CLP Regulation.
- v uporabljeni metodi usklajevanja bi bilo treba vsaj ohraniti enako raven varovanja kot v veljavni direktivi, ker ni mogoča enakovredna pretvorba;
- Since no one-to-one translation is possible, the used alignment method should at least maintain the same level of protection as the current Directive.
- za nenamerne spremembe področja uporabe so potrebni popravni mehanizmi;
- Correction mechanisms are necessary in order to handle unintended changes in the scope .
- S spremembami obstoječe direktive bi morali izboljšati izvajanje in izvršljivost ter tako povečati konkurenčnost in kolikor mogoče zmanjšati upravno breme za industrijo;
- Changes to the current Directive should improve implementation and enforceability and thereby increase the level playing field and where possible reduce the administrative burden for industry.
- za zagotovitev visoke ravni varovanja so bistveni dostop do informacij, udeležba javnosti pri odločanju in dostop do pravnega varstva;
- Access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice is essential for ensuring a high level of protection;
- da bi preprečili verižne učinke, bi bilo treba zagotoviti dobro sodelovanje in izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi organi, organizacijami in sosednjimi območji.
- To prevent possible domino effects, a smooth cooperation and exchange of information should be ensured between competent authorities, establishments and neighbouring sites
a) Uskladitev Priloge I z uredbo CLP
a) The alignment of Annex I to the CLP Regulation
Z uredbo CLP se uvaja nov, bolj izpopolnjen sistem razvrščanja, zlasti glede vzorčno-posledične povezave med stikom ljudi z nevarnimi snovmi in nevarnostmi za zdravje.
The CLP Regulation introduces a new, more sophisticated classification s ystem in particular regarding the cause to effect relationship between human contact with dangerous substances and the resulting health hazards.
V predhodnem sistemu razvrščanja se je stopnja strupenosti posamezne snovi izrazila samo z dvema razredoma strupenosti (T in T+), nikakor pa ni bilo mogoče razlikovanje na podlagi vrste stika z nevarno snovjo.
Under the previous classification system, the degree of toxicity of a given substance was expressed by means of two toxicity classes (T and T+) only, and differentiation based on type of contact with the dangerous substance was not possible at all .
Z novim sistemom razvrščanja se uvajajo trije razredi strupenosti (akutna strupenost kategorije 1, 2 in 3), ki se nadalje podrobneje opredelijo glede na pet možnih načinov izpostavljenosti (pri zaužitju, v stiku s kožo, pri vdihavanju plinov, hlapov in aerosolov).
The new classification system introduces 3 toxicity classes (Acute Toxic 1, 2 and 3) which are further fine tuned via 5 possible exposure routes (oral; dermal; inhalation gas; inhalation vapour; inhalation aerosol).
Dodana vrednost novega sistema je natančnejša metoda ugotavljanja neposredne ogroženosti življenja in zdravja ljudi, pri kateri se upoštevajo naslednji dejavniki:
The added value of the new system is a more exact identification method of the direct threat on human life and health, taking into account the following factors :
– vrsta stika ljudi z nevarnimi snovmi prek različnih načinov izpostavljenosti,
— the nature of human contact with dangerous substances through the different exposure routes,
– raven ogroženosti človeškega življenja zaradi nevarnih snovi, izražena z razredom akutne strupenosti zadevne snovi (na podlagi preučitve smrtnega odmerka ali parametra smrtne koncentracije snovi).
— the level of threat on human life represented by the dangerous substance, expressed by the acute toxicity class of the substance in question (resulting from the examination of the Lethal Dose or Lethal Concentration parameter of the substance).
Ta direktiva bi morala veljati za snovi, ki zadevajo direktivo Seveso in spadajo v zgornje tri razrede strupenosti, saj znanstveni dokazi kažejo, da imajo ti razredi usodne posledice za zdravje ljudi ali mu dolgotrajno škodijo in gre torej pri njih za nesprejemljivo raven nevarnosti za zdravje ljudi.
Since scientific evidence shows that the above three acute toxicity classes represent a level of unacceptable threat on human health, due to their lethal consequences or to the long-lasting damages on human health, Seveso-relevant substances falling into these categories shall be covered by the Directive.
Na podlagi trenutno razpoložljivih informacij je videti, da predlog Komisije ohranja enako raven varovanja in bo v številnih organizacijah povzročil le manjše spremembe.
According to the current available information it seems that the Commission proposal maintains the same level of protection and would just result in a small change in the number of establishments involved.
Zato se je poročevalec odločil, da predlagane metodologije ne bo spreminjal.
The Rapporteur therefore chose not to amend the proposed methodology.
b) Okvir odstopanj
b) The derogations framework
Mehanizem za odstopanja, ki ga je predlagala Komisija, vsebuje odstopanje na ravni EU za snovi in posebno odstopanje na ravni držav članic za organizacije na podlagi usklajenih meril.
The mechanism proposed by the Commission for derogations contains an EU-wide substance derogation and an establishment-specific derogation triggered at Member State level based on harmonised criteria.
Komisija predlaga, naj se obe odstopanji uvedeta z delegiranimi akti.
The Commission proposes to establish both of them by delegated acts.
Poročevalec tega pristopa ne podpira iz naslednjih razlogov:
The Rapporteur does not support this approach, for the following reasons:
- usklajena merila za odstopanja bi morala biti opredeljena že v temeljnem zakonodajnem aktu, ne pa z delegiranimi akti;
- The harmonised criteria for derogations should already be defined in the basic legislative act and not by delegated acts.
- možnost, da sme pristojni organ opustiti vse obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz členov 7 do 19, bi utegnila zmanjšati raven varovanja; zato poročevalec predlaga, naj se pristojnemu organu dovoli opustitev samo tistih zahtev za informacije, ki se zahtevajo za organizacije višje stopnje (členi 9, 10(b), 11, 13(2)).
- The possibility for the competent authority to waive all obligations stemming from Articles 7 to 19 could decrease the level of protection ; the proposal is therefore to allow the competent authority to waive only those information requirements which are required for upper-tier establishments (Article 9, (10(b), 11, 13(2)).
Poudariti je treba, da posledica odstopanja za snovi v poročevalčevem predlogu ne bo popolna oprostitev snovi, saj ne bo izvzeta iz področja uporabe.
It needs to be emphasised that in the proposal by the Rapporteur the substance derogation will not result in the full exemption of a substance; it is not ‘taking a substance out’ of the scope.
Predlog se bolj nanaša na opredelitev posebnih okoliščin (na primer oblika pakiranja), v katerih ta snov morda ne predstavlja velike nevarnosti.
It rather defines specific circumstances (e.g. form of packaging) under which that substance may not represent a significant hazard.
c) Dostop do informacij, udeležba javnosti pri odločanju in dostop do pravne varnosti
c) Access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice
Poročevalec podpira Komisijo v zvezi z izboljšanjem ravni in kakovosti informacij, javno udeležbo pri odločanju in dostopom do pravne varnosti.
The Rapporteur supports the Commission regarding the improvement of the level and quality of information, the public participation in the decision making process and access to justice.
Javnost mora biti dobro obveščena in imeti neposreden dostop do informacij, ki so pomembne za udeležbo pri odločanju in za ukrepanje v primeru nesreče.
The public needs to be well informed and have immediate access to information relevant for participating in the decision making process and for acting in case of an accident.
Hkrati pa morajo biti razkrite informacije razumljive.
At the same time the information disclosed does however need to be comprehensible.
Kadar je to potrebno in primerno zaradi gospodarskih in varnostnih razlogov, pa je treba zagotoviti zaupnost informacij.
Where necessary and appropriate for economic and security reasons, confidentiality of information needs to be ensured.
V Prilogi V so po točkah navedene informacije, ki morajo biti javnosti ves čas na razpolago, tudi prek spleta.
Annex V contains the items of information to be made permanently available to the public, including through the internet.
Informacije iz točke 4 (tehnične informacije o nevarnih snoveh) in iz točke 6 (ugotovitve inšpekcijskih pregledov) so morda lahko preveč podrobne in tehnične ter lahko povzročijo težave v zvezi z zaupnostjo.
Item 4 (technical information on the dangerous substances) and item 6 (findings of the inspections) might potentially be too detailed and technical and might create problems of confidentiality.
Zato poročevalec predlaga zahtevo, da se zagotovi enostavna razlaga o nevarnih snoveh na spletu in navede, kdaj je bil v organizaciji izveden inšpekcijski pregled.
The Rapporteur therefore proposes a requirement to explain the dangerous substances in simple terms on the internet and to indicate when an establishment has been inspected.
Podrobnejše in bolj specializirane informacije o nevarnih snoveh in inšpekcijskih pregledih pa bi morale biti razpoložljive vsaj na zahtevo.
The more detailed and specialised info on the dangerous substances and on the inspections should at least be made available on request.
V tem primeru se lahko države članice same odločijo, ali bi bilo primerno, da se tudi podrobnejše in tehnične informacije objavijo na spletu.
The Member States can then decide themselves whether they consider it to be appropriate to put also the more detailed and technical information on the internet.
Komisija je okrepila zahteve v zvezi z inšpekcijskimi pregledi.
The Commission strengthens the requirements in relation to inspections.
Pogostost teh pregledov je enaka kot v členu 23 Direktive 2010/75/EU o industrijskih emisijah, po katerem obdobje med dvema obiskoma na kraju samem za obrate, ki predstavljajo največje tveganje, ne bi smelo biti daljše od enega leta, za obrate, ki predstavljajo najmanjše tveganje pa ne daljše od treh let.
The same frequency is followed as in article 23 of the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010/75/EU, where the period between two site visits shall not exceed 1 year for installations posing the highest risks and 3 years for installations posing the lowest risks.
Skupina neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani na visoki ravni za upravna bremena, ki jo je sestavila Komisija, je v svojem mnenju o prednostnem okoljskem področju ocenila, da približno polovica obratov iz direktive Seveso II spada tudi v področje direktive o industrijskih emisijah.
The High Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens set up by the Commission estimated in its opinion on the priority area Environment that around half of the installations that fall under the Seveso II Directive also fall under the IED.
Uskladitev ali združitev teh vrst inšpekcijskih pregledov bi zmanjšala upravna bremena, povezana s pripravo, navzočnostjo inšpektorjev in spremljanjem.
Coordination or integration between these types of inspections would reduce the administrative burden related to the preparation, presence of inspectors and follow up.
Zato poročevalec države članice spodbuja, naj pripomorejo k uskladitvi v tej smeri.
Therefore, the Rapporteur encourages Member States to facilitate such coordination.
Predlagane določbe o inšpekcijskih pregledih prispevajo k boljšemu izvajanju ter tako povečujejo raven varovanja in konkurenčnost.
The proposed provisions on inspections contribute to improved implementation and thereby increase the level of protection and the level playing field.
Predlagana revizija direktive Seveso II je potrebna, Komisija pa se je pravilno odločila, da ohrani raven varovanja in ne bo bistveno spreminjala področja uporabe.
The proposed revision of the Seveso II Directive is necessary and the Commission rightly chose to maintain the level of protection and to avoid large changes in the scope.
Poročevalec podpira metodologijo Komisije za prilagajanje uredbi CLP.
The Rapporteur supports the methodology chosen by the Commission for the alignment to the CLP Directive.
Glede na rezultate revizije in predlo Komisije niso potrebne velike spremembe v zvezi z osnovno strukturo in glavnimi določbami obstoječe direktive.
In line with the outcome of the review and the Commission proposal, no major changes regarding the basic structure and the main provisions of the current Directive are needed.
Poročevalec je v glavnem zaskrbljen zaradi predloga Komisije, da bi se z uporabo delegiranih aktov uvajale spremembe Priloge I, v kateri je opredeljeno področje uporabe direktive.
One of the Rapporteur's main concerns is the proposal by the Commission to use delegated acts for changes to Annex I, which defines the scope of the Directive.
Ker je ta priloga bistven del direktive, poročevalec predlaga, da se dovoli njeno spreminjanje samo z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom.
As Annex I is an essential part of the Directive, the Rapporteur proposes to only allow for modifications through the ordinary legislative procedure.
Dodajanje snovi bi utegnilo bistveno spremeniti področje uporabe, kar bi lahko imelo velike gospodarske posledice.
The addition of substances could lead to substantial changes in the scope with potentially large economic impacts.
Cilj Direktive 96/82/ES, poznane kot direktiva Seveso II, je preprečevanje večjih nesreč, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi ter omejevanje njihovih posledic za človekovo zdravje in okolje z analizo tveganj ter sprejetjem ustreznih previdnostnih ukrepov.
Directive 96/82/EC, known as the ‘Seveso II Directive’, aims to prevent major accidents involving dangerous substances and to limit their consequences on human health and the environment by analysing risks and taking appropriate precautionary action.
Snovi, ki spadajo v področje uporabe direktive, se uporabljajo zlasti v kemični industriji.
The substances falling within its scope are chiefly used in the chemical industry.
Ta zakonodaja se uporablja za organizacije, v katerih so nevarne snovi iz direktive prisotne v količinah, ki presegajo predpisane mejne vrednosti (približno 10.000 industrijskih obratov v EU).
The rules apply to establishments where dangerous substances listed in the directive are present above prescribed thresholds (around 10 000 industrial establishments are affected in the EU).
Komisija je sklenila, da bo revizijo direktive, ki je potrebna zaradi sprejetja in prihodnjega začetka veljavnosti Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 o razvrščanju, označevanju in pakiranju snovi ter zmesi (v nadaljnjem besedilu uredba CLP), na katero se direktiva nanaša, izkoristila za pregled njene temeljne strukture in predpisov, ki od njenega sprejetja niso bili spremenjeni.
The Commission decided to use the review of the directive made necessary by the adoption and forthcoming entry in force of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of dangerous substances and mixtures (hereinafter the ‘CLP Regulation’) – to which the directive refers – as an opportunity to conduct a further review of its essential structure and provisions which had not been amended since its adoption.
Glavne spremembe so povezane z nevarnostmi za zdravje.
The principal changes concern health hazards.
Nekdanja kategorija „zelo strupenih“ snovi se nadomesti z novo kategorijo „akutna strupenost kategorije 1“, kategorija „strupenih“ snovi pa se razdeli v kategoriji „akutna strupenost kategorije 2“ (uporablja se za vse načine izpostavljenosti) ter „akutna strupenost kategorije 3“ (načina izpostavljenosti v stiku s kožo in pri vdihavanju).
The former category ‘very toxic’ has been replaced by the new category ‘acute toxic, category 1’ and the old category ‘toxic’ has been split into ‘acute toxic, category 2’ (applicable to all exposure routes) and ‘acute toxic, category 3’ (dermal and inhalation routes).
Splošnejše nekdanje kategorije nevarnosti eksplozivnih, oksidativnih in vnetljivih snovi se v uredbi CLP nadomestijo z novimi posebnimi kategorijami v zvezi s fizikalno nevarnostjo.
Several more new specific categories for physical hazards are introduced by the CLP Regulation to replace the more general old categories for explosive, oxidizing and flammable hazards.
Komisija za te kategorije in za kategorijo nevarnosti za okolje predlaga neposreden prenos zakonodaje brez večjih sprememb.
The Commission proposes a straightforward transposition, without major changes, for these categories, together with those concerning environmental hazards.
Med drugimi predlogi sprememb so še nova pravila glede dostopa javnosti do informacij o varnosti, dostopu do pravnega varstva in udeležbi javnosti pri postopkih odločanja.
Other proposed changes include new rules on public access to safety information and to justice, as well as public participation in the decision-making process.
Stališče pripravljavca mnenja:
Position of the rapporteur:
Ali gre le za obnovitev fasade ali pa bo glede na nesreče in naravne katastrofe, ki smo jim priča od leta 1996, zagotovljena večja varnost za ljudi, okolje in družbo brez nepotrebnih ovir za industrijo?
Or, given the accidents and natural disasters we have experienced since 1996, are we progressing towards greater safety for people, the environment and society, without pointlessly encumbering industry?
Posebne opombe:
Particular comments
1) Besedilo dopušča državam članicam preveč možnosti za odstopanja , s tem pa tudi možnosti, da obidejo načela preprečevanja, zato bi bilo treba te možnosti omejiti.
1) The text leaves Member States too great a margin for exemptions , which could give them too much room to avoid principles of prevention and thus should be reduced.