natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da lahko obrat za pridobivanje bioplina iz živinskega gnoja , blata iz čistilnih naprav ali organskih odpadkov povzroči večji odstotek izpusta amoniaka; vendar ugotavlja, da bi bilo ta stranski učinek razmeroma lahko obvladovati, s tem da bi morali biti preprečevalni ukrepi, povezani z obrati za pridobivanje bioplina, vključeni v nacionalno zakonodajo in tudi upoštevani pri dodeljevanju pomoči zanje;
Points out that biogas installations which use livestock manure, sludge or organic waste may lead to higher rates of leaching of ammonia;states, however, that this side effect can be contained relatively easily, and preventive measures ought to be incorporated into national laws concerning biogas installations as well as into aid grants for such installations;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj zagotovijo, da obrati za pridobivanje bioplina ne puščajo metana, saj bi to lahko onemogočilo ugoden vpliv na globalno segrevanje;
Urges Member States and the Commission to ensure that biogas installations do not leak methane, as that could compromise their positive effect on global warming;
Sposobnost ekonomskega preživetja in sheme podpore
Economic viability and support schemes
ponovno poudarja, da mora vsa finančna podpora obratom za pridobivanje bioplina temeljiti na učinkovitosti, tehničnem razvoju in pozitivni bilanci glede toplogrednih plinov ter ustvarjanju dodane vrednosti na živinorejskih kmetijah, v podeželskih območjih in drugih ekonomskih in okoljskih prednostih teh obratov; poudarja, da varnost preskrbe prebivalstva s hrano ne sme biti ogrožena;
Reiterates that all financial support for biogas installations ought to be based on efficiency, technical development, a positive greenhouse gas balance, the creation of added value for livestock farms and in rural regions, and other economic and environmental advantages of such installations; stresses that security of food supply to the population must not be jeopardised;
z veliko zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da postaja konkurenca med uporabo nekaterih kmetijskih proizvodov, npr. koruze, za proizvodnjo energije in njihovo uporabo v prehrambeni verigi v številnih državah članicah vse večja; poudarja, da se je krma zaradi tega močno podražila;
Notes with deep concern the increasing competition in many Member States between energy use and use in the food and feed chain of certain agricultural products like maize; emphasises the fact that such competition has led to a considerable increase in feedingstuff prices;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pri bodočih predlogih glede ureditve sektorja za bioplin ne upoštevajo zgolj okoljskih vidikov, ampak tudi vplive na kakovostno in trajnostno pridelavo hrane;
Calls on the Commission and Member States, when presenting future proposals on regulation of the biogas sector, to examine not only the environmental aspects but also the effect on high-quality, sustainable food production;
poudarja, da mora imeti proizvodnja bioplina iz živinskega gnoja, blata iz čistilnih naprav in iz živalskih in organskih odpadkov prednost, saj so trajnostne in okoljske koristi takšnih metod nedvomne;
Emphasises that biogas production based on livestock manure, sludge and animal and organic waste should be prioritised as the sustainability and environmental benefits of these methods are unequivocal;
ugotavlja, da je najustreznejša velikost obrata za pridobivanje bioplina odvisna od različnih okoliščin, ki določajo ekonomijo obsega, zato bi morala biti temeljito preučena; meni, da je predvsem potrebno, da se poleg ocene gospodarskega učinka in ravnotežja toplogrednih plinov oceni vpliv obsega obratov na okoliško pokrajino v smislu širjenja monokulture na račun določenih drugih kulturnih rastlin;
Notes that the optimal size of a biogas installation depends on various circumstances determining the economics of scale, that should be thoroughly studied; considers that, in addition to an economic assessment and the greenhouse gas balance, it is above all necessary to assess the effect of the size of the installation on the surrounding landscape with regard to expansion of monoculture in respect of certain crops;
poudarja, da bi bilo z okoljskega in gospodarskega vidika najbolje, da bi izvajalci v takšnih obratih kombinirano uporabljali vse razpoložljive organske snovi;
Stresses that it would be best for biogas installation operators to combine and use all available organic matter both from an environmental and an economic perspective;
meni, da mladi in inovativni sektor za bioplin sicer potrebuje začetno spodbudo, da pa bi se morali ti spodbujevalni sistemi končati, ko bo tržno donosen;
Considers that, whilst the young and innovative biogas sector needs start-up support, such support schemes should only last until the sector has become commercially viable;
poudarja, da je treba še naprej financirati obrate za pridobivanje bioplina zgolj iz rastlin in hkrati skrbno spremljati ter se vseskozi osredotočati na najnaprednejše in najučinkovitejše obrate ali sisteme, da se zagotovi ekonomska in tehnična prednost EU na tem področju in se raziščejo prihodnje možnosti;
States that funding for solely plant-based biogas installations needs to be continued under careful monitoring and refocusing on the most advanced and efficient installations or systems to ensure the EU´s economic and technical advantage in the field and to explore options for the future;
poziva Komisijo, naj poroča, kako bi lahko merila za ekonomsko in okoljsko učinkovitost in trajnost vključili v področje energetskih rastlin, s čimer bi ta razmeroma nova tehnika postala bolj okolju prijazna, pa tudi proizvodnja hrane in oskrbe z njo bi bila ustrezno obravnavana,
Asks the Commission to report on how criteria on economic and environmental efficiency and sustainability can be introduced for energy crops, which would lead to this relatively new technique becoming more environmentally friendly, and which would ensure that the concerns relating to food production and supply are properly addressed;
poziva k okrepitvi prizadevanj pri iskanju in pospeševanju novih tehnologij za pridobivanje bioplina, zlasti za izkoriščanje biomase (bioplina druge generacije) kot biogoriva in izboljšanje donosnosti obratov za pridobivanje bioplina, saj se lahko učinkovitost takih obratov bistveno poveča le z inovativnimi tehnologijami, ko so tehnike za predelavo plina;
Calls for greater effort to be put into researching and promoting new technologies for biogas, particularly into the exploitation of biomass (second generation biogas) as a biofuel and improving the profitability of biogas installations that offer the greatest environmental benefits, since it is only by means of innovative technology, such as gas recovery techniques, that the effectiveness of biogas installations can be significantly increased;
opozarja Komisijo in države članice, da nadaljnji napredek na področju bioplina ni mogoč brez dodatnega financiranja; opozarja, da mora biti financiranje usmerjeno v raziskave in razvoj, prenos rezultatov posebnih projektov v obrate in v večjo podporo "zeleni električni energiji" in "zelenemu plinu";
Reminds Member States and the Commission that further advancement of biogas is not possible without additional funding; recalls that funding needs to be provided for research and development, for the promotion of results from specific projects, for installations and for the increased support of 'green electricity' and 'green gas';
opozarja, da imajo tiste države članice, ki z ustreznimi subvencijami k cenam ali drugimi ukrepi nudijo posebne spodbude zeleni energiji, tudi največ uspeha pri spodbujanju proizvodnje in uporabe bioplina;
Recalls that those Member States that are providing extra incentives for 'green energy', by means of adequate price subsidies or through other measures, are also the most successful in promoting biogas;
meni, da bi morala biti proizvodnja "zelenega plina" subvencionirana na isti način kot "zelena električna energija";
Considers that 'green gas' production should be subsidised in the same way as 'green electricity';
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo sredstva iz EU in nacionalnih programov dobili najučinkovitejši in v trajnostnem smislu najnaprednejši obrati, še posebej tisti, ki proizvajajo električno energijo in toploto, ali da bodo namenjena vzpostavljanju zmogljivosti in omrežij za izboljšanje kakovosti bioplina in oskrbo z njim prek omrežij zemeljskega plina;
Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that funds from EU and national programmes go to the most efficient and sustainable installations, especially to installations that produce electricity and heat, or to the installation of facilities and grids for upgrading and feeding biogas into the natural gas network;
s tem v zvezi poudarja, da mora dovajanje električne energije , toplote in zemeljskega plina v omrežje potekati nediskriminatorno, in poziva, naj bo bioplin izenačen z zemeljskim plinom, da bo lahko po dovajanju v omrežje zemeljskega plina polnovredno izkoriščen;
Stresses in this regard that the supply of electricity, heat and natural gas to networks must be non-discriminatory, and calls for biogas to be treated in the same way as natural gas to enable it to achieve its full potential once it has been introduced into the natural gas network;
meni, da lahko poenostavitev postopkov za trgovanje s CO2 veliko prispeva k ekonomski utemeljenosti in trajnostni naravnanosti obratov za pridobivanje bioplina;
Believes that simplification of the procedures for trade in CO2 can significantly contribute to the economic viability and sustainability of biogas installations;
poudarja, da lahko obrati za pridobivanje bioplina pomagajo kmetovalcem, ki nimajo zadostnih zmogljivosti za skladiščenje živinskega gnoja, rešiti ta problem na gospodarsko zadovoljiv način;
Stresses that biogas installations may assist farmers who do not yet have enough storage capacity for livestock manure to solve this problem in an economically viable manner;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da vzpostavitve obratov za pridobivanje bioplina in odobritve uporabe organskih odpadkov in blata iz čistilnih naprav ne bodo ovirali nepotrebno dolgi upravni postopki in predpisi;
Asks the Commission and Member States to ensure that the setting up of biogas installations, as well as authorisation of the use of organic waste and sludge, is not impeded by unnecessarily lengthy administrative procedures and regulations;
opozarja na glavne razlike pri dolžini in vsebini nacionalnih postopkov za odobritev obratov za pridobivanje bioplina in poziva države članice, naj preprečijo, da bi zahteve na nacionalni ravni pri regionalnem načrtovanju in podeljevanju licenc in odobritev predstavljale oviro;
Draws attention to the major differences in terms of length and content that exist between national approval procedures for biogas installations, and calls on Member States to ensure that national requirements in the area of regional planning and the granting of licences and approvals do not form an unnecessary hindrance;
poziva k uvedbi poenostavljenega postopka za pridobitev gradbenih dovoljenja za obrate za pridobivanje bioplina;
Calls for a simplified planning permission procedure to be introduced for the construction of biogas installations;
poziva Komisijo, naj sestavi skupni pozitivni seznam izdelkov, ki se jih lahko uporabi v obratih za pridobivanje bioplina in s tem zagotoviti enotne pogoje delovanje kmetom v različnih državah članicah;
Calls on the Commission to establish a common positive list of products which are permitted for use in biogas installations, so as to ensure a level playing field between farmers in different Member States;
spodbuja kmetovalce, naj sodelujejo pri vzpostavitvi in upravljanju obratov za pridobivanje bioplina;
Encourages farmers to cooperate in setting up and operating biogas installations;
Potreba po reviziji zakonodaje EU
The need for review of EU legislation
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj na področju bioplina razvijejo skladno politiko; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi posebno poročilo o bioplinu in spodbujanju njegove uporabe v EU s poudarkom na potrebnih spremembah v zakonodaji Skupnosti in nacionalnih zakonodajah, da bi omogočili nadaljnjo širitev sektorja za bioplin, ter izpostavi najučinkovitejše načine uporabe evropskih sredstev in programov, pa tudi najboljše primere iz prakse; v zvezi s tem tudi prosi za oceno vpliva različnih oblik pridobivanja bioplina na podnebje, krajino in svetovno varnost preskrbe s hrano;
Urges the Commission and Member States to develop a coherent biogas policy; asks the Commission to present a specific report on biogas and its promotion in the EU, outlining the necessary changes in Community and national law to facilitate further expansion of the biogas sector and pointing out the most efficient ways of using EU funds and programmes, as well as giving best practice examples; asks also, in this regard, for an impact assessment of the various forms of biogas production on climate, the ecology of the landscape, rural incomes and worldwide security of food supply;
predlaga, da se spodbujanje bioplina celovito vključi v okviru predlagane direktive o spodbujanju uporabe energije iz obnovljivih virov ( KOM(2008)0019 ) s posebnim poudarkom na naslednjih elementih:
Proposes that the promotion of biogas be fully included in the framework of the proposed Directive on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources ( COM(2008)0019 ), with special emphasis on the following:
letni statistiki in poročilu o proizvodnji bioplina iz kmetijskih ostankov, da bi lahko sledili uresničevanju ciljev,
annual statistics and reports on agricultural biogas production in order to be able to follow up on the targets,
ukrepih za izgradnjo in spodbujanje obratov za pridobivanje bioplina na podlagi nacionalne in regionalne presoje vpliva, s spodbujanjem takšnih obratov, ki na nacionalni in regionalni ravni najbolj koristijo okolju in jih v ekonomskem smislu lahko imenujemo trajnostne; v vse načrte morajo biti vključeni ukrepi za širjenje in spodbujanje rezultatov, pridobljenih iz prejšnjih izkušenj ali demonstracijskih projektov; če ureditev glede regionalnega razvoja in razvoja podeželja ne dopušča financiranja takšnih ukrepov, je treba ureditev spremeniti,
measures for the construction and promotion of biogas installations based on a national or regional impact assessment, promoting those installations that, nationally and/or regionally, are most beneficial to the environment and which are economically sustainable; measures for the dissemination and promotion of results gained from prior experiences or demonstration projects need to be included in all plans; if regional and rural development regulations do not allow funding of such measures, they must be amended,
določbah, ki bi spodbujale ali zahtevale od držav članic sprejetje nacionalnih in regionalnih načrtov za omejitev zakonodajnih in upravnih ovir, saj na primer zemeljski plin ali druga fosilna goriva ne bi smela imeti prednosti na področjih, ki lahko za ogrevanje prodajajo lokalnim ponudnikom toploto, pridobljeno iz bioplina;
provisions encouraging or requiring Member States to engage in national and regional planning in order to limit legal and administrative impediments, for instance natural gas or other fossil fuels should not be preferred in areas in which it is feasible to sell heat generated from biogas to local heating providers;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predstavi predlog za direktivo o bioloških odpadkih, vključno s standardi kakovosti; poziva Komisijo, naj razišče možnost za skupno direktivo o bioplinu in bioloških odpadkih;
Urges the Commission to present as soon as possible a proposal for a biowaste directive, which shall include quality standards; invites the Commission to explore the possibility for a joint biogas and biowaste directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi predloge za zakonodajo o uporabi ostankov iz obratov za pridobivanje bioplina; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi uporabo zgolj organskega materiala, katerega ostanki se lahko uporabijo v obratih za pridobivanje bioplina brez nevarnosti za okolje; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o prepovedi uporabe takšnih spodbujevalcev rasti v živalski krmi, ki vsebujejo težke kovine, če bi to predstavljalo problem v vsej EU pri poznejši uporabi ostankov bioplina na poljih.
Asks the Commission to present proposals for legislation on the use of residues from biogas installations; asks the Commission to ensure that only organic material that allows residues to be used without endangering the environment may be used in biogas installations; asks the Commission to consider banning growth enhancers in animal feed containing heavy metals if this should prove to be a EU-wide problem for subsequent use of biogas residues in fields;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo Direktiva 2008/1/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2008 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja UL L 24, 29.1.2008, str.
Asks the Commission to ensure that Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p.
, direktiva o nitratih Direktiva Sveta 91/676/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o varstvu voda pred onesnaževanjem z nitrati iz kmetijskih virov (UL L 375, 31.12.1991, str.
, the Nitrates Directives Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila spremnjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1882/2003 (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str.
Directive amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p.
, direktiva o blatu iz čistilnih naprav Direktiva Sveta 86/278/EGS z dne 12. junija 1986 o varstvu okolja, zlasti tal, kadar se blato iz čistilnih naprav uporablja v kmetijstvu (UL L 181, 4.7.1986, str.
, the Sewage Sludge Directive Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture (OJ L 181, 4.7.1986, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 807/2003 (UL L 122, 16.5.2003, str.
Directive last amended by Regulation (EC) No 807/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p.
, okvirna direktiva o vodah Direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
, the Water Framework Directive Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.
Direktiva, spremenjena z Odločbo št. 2455/2001/ES (UL L 331, 15.12.2001, str.
Directive amended by Decision No 2455/2001/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2001, p.
, direktiva o pticah Direktiva Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic (UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
, the Birds Directive Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/105/ES (UL L 363, 20.12.2006, str.
Directive last amended by Directive 2006/105/EC (OJ L 363, 20.12.2006, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2006/105/ES.
7).Directive last amended by Directive 2006/105/EC.
in zakonodaja o težkih kovinah učinkovito uveljavljene v vseh državah članicah in regijah, saj bo to vzbudilo več zanimanja za obrate za pridobivanje bioplina, pridobljen iz živinskega gnoja in blata iz čistilnih naprav;
and the Heavy Metals legislation are enforced effectively in all Member States and regions, thereby making biogas installations which use livestock manure and sludge more attractive;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predstavi strategijo za vključitev obratov za pridobivanje bioplina v kjotski mehanizem, na primer prek zelenih certifikatov, posebne premije ali kredite za davke na elektriko in toploto iz obratov za pridobivanje bioplina ali druge ukrepe; poudarja, da bi to povečalo stroškovno učinkovitost obratov za pridobivanje bioplina in hkrati omogočilo večjo preglednost prizadevanj kmetijskega sektorja na področju podnebnih sprememb;
Urges the Commission to present as soon as possible a strategy to include biogas installations in the Kyoto Mechanisms, for example through 'green certificates', special premiums or tax credits for electricity and heat generated in biogas installations or other measures; points out that this would increase the cost-efficiency of biogas installations and, at the same time, make efforts in the area of agriculture to combat climate change more transparent;
poziva k oceni odvečnosti direktive o nitratih po tem, ko bo direktiva o vodah v celoti prenesena;
Calls for an assessment of whether or not the Nitrates Directive will be superfluous once the Water Framework Directive is fully implemented;
ponovno poudarja, da uporaba umetnih gnojil v zakonodaji EU ne bi smela imeti prednosti pred uporabo živinskega gnoja in stranskih proizvodov iz obratov za pridobivanje bioplina; zato vztrajno poziva k reviziji opredelitve živinskega gnoja iz direktive o nitratih kot prvemu koraku;
Re-emphasises that the use of artificial fertilisers should not be favoured in EU legislation over the use of livestock manure and by-products of biogas installations; calls urgently, therefore, as a first step, for a review of the definition of livestock manure under the Nitrates Directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj oskrbo z bioplinom prek omrežij zemeljskega plina pospešijo s priporočili ali direktivo;
Asks the Commission to promote the feeding of biogas into natural gas networks by way of recommendations or a directive;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži svoje predloge za nadaljnje izboljšanje uporabe živalskih stranskih proizvodov in stranskih proizvodov kmetijskih poljščin za proizvodnjo bioplina, kakor je napovedano v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisije z dne 7. decembra 2005;
Asks the Commission to present as soon as possible its proposals for further enhancing the use of animal and agricultural crop by-products for the production of biogas as announced in the above-mentioned Commission Communication of 7 December 2005;
poziva države članice, ki v obstoječe nacionalne razvojne programe niso prenesle nobenih ukrepov ali so jih prenesle premalo, da bioplin vključijo v vmesno vrednotenje obstoječih programov za razvoj podeželja in regij ter predlagajo ukrepe za prihodnost;
Urges Member States that have not incorporated any measures or have not incorporated sufficient measures in existing national development programmes to include biogas in their mid-term evaluation of existing rural and regional development programmes, and to propose actions for the future;
poziva Komisijo, naj s pomočjo prenosa znanja in tehnologije zagotovi sodelovanje in usklajevanje med državami članicami, tudi tistimi, ki trenutno nimajo nobenega obrata za pridobivanje bioplina ali jih imajo zgolj nekaj, da bi se med seboj seznanjale z najboljšimi praksami na področju tovrstnih obratov;
Calls on the Commission to ensure cooperation and coordination between Member States, including those who currently have no biogas installations, or just a small number thereof, so that they may learn about each other's best practices in relation to biogas installations through the sharing of knowledge and technology;
poziva Komisijo naj najpozneje do 15. decembra 2008 Parlamentu predstavi usklajeno poročilo o proizvodnji bioplina v EU in o prihodnjih obetih na tem področju, vključno z oceno vpliva, ter pri tem upošteva predloge Parlamenta in doseženi napredek;
Asks the Commission to present a coherent report on EU biogas production and future prospects in this area, including an impact assessment, to Parliament by 15 December 2008 at the latest, which will take into account Parliament´s proposals and progress made;