natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju zakonodajnega svežnja o gospodarskem upravljanju, sprejetega 16. novembra 2011, predvsem Uredbe (EU) št. 1176/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o preprečevanju in odpravljanju makroekonomskih neravnovesij UL L 306, 23.11.2011, str.
– having regard to the legislative package on economic governance adopted on 16 November 2011 and, in particular, to Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije z dne 27. oktobra 2011 z naslovom: Preglednica dosežkov za nadzor makroekonomskih neravnovesij: predvidena začetna zasnova ( SEC(2011)1361 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working paper of 27 October 2011 entitled ‘Scoreboard for the surveillance of macroeconomic imbalances: envisaged initial design’ ( SEC(2011)1361 ),
2. poudarja, da je z ozirom na sedanje gospodarske razmere nujno kolikor hitro mogoče vzpostaviti in začeti izvajati okvir za makroekonomski nadzor;
Stresses that, in the light of the current economic situation, it is essential for the macroeconomic surveillance framework to be up and running as soon as possible;
4. meni, da morajo biti vlade držav članic pripravljene na ukrepanje ob morebitnih težavah, saj je mogoče le tako zagotoviti, da bo nadzorni okvir dosegel želeni učinek;
Takes the view that Member State governments need to be ready to take action on potential problems, as this is the only way to make sure that the surveillance framework has the desired impact;
7. ugotavlja, da Komisija ni upoštevala vseh elementov, podanih za ekonomsko razlago preglednice dosežkov v členu 4 Uredbe (EU) št. 1176/2011; zahteva, da Komisija vključi vse navedene elemente v gospodarsko razlago preglednice dosežkov, predvsem v zvezi z zaposlovanjem, gonili produktivnosti in vlogo energije;
Notes that the Commission has not taken into account all the elements specified for the economic reading of the scoreboard in Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011; asks the Commission to include all these elements in the economic reading of the scoreboard, notably in relation to employment, drivers of productivity and the role of energy;
12. poudarja, da lahko Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve organizira javne predstavitve o zasnovi preglednice dosežkov, preden predstavi svoje mnenje o uvedbi novih kazalnikov in spremembi pragov;
Stresses that the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs can organise public hearings on the design of the scoreboard before giving its views on the incorporation of new indicators and the modification of thresholds;
o bodočem protokolu o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega nadomestila v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko
on the future Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
PE479.390v01-00 B7‑0691/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o bodočem protokolu o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega nadomestila v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
PE479.390v01-00 B7‑0691/2011 European Parliament resolution on the future Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 764/2006 z dne 22. maja 2006 UL L 141,29, 18.5.2006, str.
– having regard to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco (Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2006 of 22 May 2006 OJ L 141,29.5.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sedanjega protokola o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega nadomestila v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko (0000/2011),
– having regard to the current Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco (0000/2011),
– ob upoštevanju postopka za odobritev v skladu s členom 43(2) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (C7-0000/2011),
– having regard to consent procedure pursuant to Article 43(2) and Article 218 (6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0000/2011),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora za razvoj in Odbora za proračun (A7-0000/2011 in A7-0000/2011),
– having regard to the opinions of the Committee on Development and the Committee on Budgets (A7-0000/2011 and A7-0000/2011),
– ob upoštevanju zunanje naknadne ocene predhodnega protokola k sporazumu, ki je veljal od 2007 do 2011,
– having regard to the external ex-post evaluation of the previous protocol to the agreement that was in effect from 2007 through 2011,
– ob upoštevanju pravnega mnenja pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta (SJ-0269/09, D(2009)37828) z dne 14. julija 2009 o Sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Maroko,
– having regard to the Legal Opinion regarding the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco by the European Parliament’s Legal Service (SJ-0269/09, D(2009)37828) of 14 July 2009,
A. ker je bil glede na poročilo o zunanji naknadni oceni, opravljeni po naročilu Evropske komisije, predhodni protokol nedvomno nezadovoljiv; ker je razmerje med stroški in koristmi najnižje od vseh dvostranskih sporazumov EU in je spodbujalo ribolov na številnih območjih izčrpanih staležev in ni prispeval k razvoju ribiškega sektorja v Maroku;
A. whereas according to the external ex-post evaluation report carried out on behalf of the European Commission the previous Protocol was clearly unsatisfactory; whereas it had the lowest cost-benefit ratio of any EU bilateral agreement, it fostered fishing on many depleted stocks and failed to contribute to the development of the fisheries sector in Morocco;
B. ker poleg tega predhodni in sedanji protokol zagotavljata ribolovne možnosti plovilom EU v vodah zavzetih ozemelj Zahodne Sahare, kar je po mnenju številnih vodilnih pravnih strokovnjakov ter pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta v nasprotju z mednarodnim pravom, ker nobena država ni priznala zahteve Maroka do tega ozemlja in ni dokaza, ki bi potrjeval, da je sporazum o ribištvu v skladu z željami ali koristmi prebivalcev Zahodne Sahare;
B. whereas in addition both the previous protocol and the current protocol provide for fishing opportunities for EU vessels in the waters off the occupied territory of the Western Sahara, a situation that a number of leading legal experts, as well as the European Parliament Legal Service, have concluded is against international law, since no country has recognized Morocco’s claim over this territory, and no proof has been found that show that the fisheries agreement is according to the wishes or benefits the people of Western Sahara;
C. ker pravno mnenje pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta ugotavlja, da če pravice saharskega ljudstva v skladu z mednarodnim pravom niso spoštovane, mora Skupnost načrtovati odložitev izvajanja sporazuma v skladu s členom 15 in 9 protokola ali izvajati sporazum na način, da se plovila, ki plujejo pod zastavo EU, izključi iz izkoriščanja voda Zahodne Sahare;
C. whereas the legal opinion of the Legal Service of the European Parliament notes that if ‘the rights’ of ‘the Saharawi people under international law’ are not respected, ‘the Community should envisage either the suspension of the agreement in conformity with its Article 15 and Article 9 of the Protocol, or to apply the agreement in such a way that EU flagged vessels are excluded from the exploitation of the waters of Western Sahara’;
D. ker Skupnost ne bi smela prostovoljno priti v položaj, v katerem bi se lahko zaradi kršitve mednarodnega prava znašla pred Mednarodnim sodiščem;
D. whereas the Community should not deliberately put itself in a position whereby it can be tried in the International Court of Justice for violation of international law;
E. ker mora vsak prihodnji protokol, o katerem se bo pogajala Komisija, rešiti resne težave, ki so bile ugotovljene v predhodnem in sedanjem protokolu;
E. whereas any future Protocol to be negotiated by the Commission must rectify the serious problems identified with the previous and current protocols;
2. vztraja, da je treba vsak prihodnji protokol omejiti na staleže rib ali druge vrste morskih živali, za katere je znanstveno dokazano, da je njihov stalež večji od zmožnosti maroških plovil za ribarjenje v skladu s pomorskim pravom ZN;
Insists that any future Protocol must be limited to those stocks of fish or other marine species for which there is a scientifically demonstrated surplus beyond the ability of the Moroccan fleet to harvest as required under the UN Law of the Sea;
5. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, državam članicam, vladi Maroka in Mednarodni komisiji za ohranitev atlantskega tuna.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Member States, the Government of Morocco and the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas.
12.12.2011 B7-0692/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0671/2011
12.12.2011 B7-0692/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0671/2011
o bodočem protokolu o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega nadomestila v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
on the future protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
PE479.391v01-00 B7‑0692/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o bodočem protokolu o določitvi ribolovnih možnosti in finančnega nadomestila v skladu s sporazumom o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
PE479.391v01-00 B7‑0692/2011 European Parliament resolution on the future protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco ( 2011/2949(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Maroko o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju (Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 764/2006 z dne 22. maja 2006 UL L 141, 29.5.2006, str.
– having regard to the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco (Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2006 of 22 May 2006 OJ L 141, 29.5.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Protokola med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko, ki določa finančni prispevek in ribolovne možnosti, predvidene s Sporazumom med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kraljevino Maroko o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju (0000/2011),
– having regard to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial compensation provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco (0000/2011),
– ob upoštevanju postopka odobritve v skladu s členom 43(2) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (C7-0000/2011),
– having regard to the consent procedure pursuant to Article 43(2) and Article 218 (6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0000/2011),
– ob upoštevanju obrazložitve v priporočilu Odbora za ribištvo ( A7-0394/2011 ), kjer so predstavljene pomanjkljivosti sedanjega enoletnega protokola,
– having regard to the explanatory statement forming part of the recommendation of the Committee on Fisheries ( A7-0394/2011 ), which outlines the shortcomings of the current one-year Protocol,
A. ker je po navedbah v zunanjem naknadnem ocenjevalnem poročilu, ki ga je naročila Komisija, v sedanjem protokolu razmerje med stroški in koristmi očitno nezadovoljivo, saj so ribolovne možnosti, dosežene s pogajanji, slabo izkoriščene, ekološki in socialni vidiki pa niso upoštevani;
A. whereas, according to the external ex-post evaluation carried out by the Commission, the current Protocol has a clearly unsatisfactory cost-benefit ratio as a result of the low rate of utilisation of the fishing opportunities negotiated and unaddressed ecological and social issues;
B. ker bi moral novi protokol, o katerem se bo za enoletno obdobje od 28. februarja 2012 pogajala Komisija , upoštevati v nadaljevanju navedene vidike,
B. whereas the new Protocol to be negotiated by the Commission for the one-year period from 28 February 2012 should take the aspects outlined below into account;
2. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo vsakršen prihodnji protokol ekonomsko, ekološko in socialno vzdržen in vzajemno koristen;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that any future Protocol is economically, ecologically and socially sustainable and mutually beneficial;
o vrhu EU-Rusija ( 2011/2948(RSP) )
on the EU-Russia summit ( 2011/2948(RSP) )
PE479.392v01-00 B7‑0693/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o vrhu EU-Rusija ( 2011/2948(RSP) )
PE479.392v01-00 B7‑0693/2011 European Parliament resolution on the EU-Russia summit ( 2011/2948(RSP) )
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Rusiji, zlasti resolucije o sklepih vrhunskega srečanja med EU in Rusijo 9. in 10. junija 2011 v Nižnem Novgorodu, resolucije z dne 7. julija 2011 o pripravah na volitve v dumo Ruske federacije decembra 2011 in resolucije z dne 17. februarja 2011 o pravni državi v Rusiji,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Russia with regard, in particular, to the one on the on the conclusions of the on the EU-Russia Summit in Nizhny Novgorod on 9-10 June 2011, the one on Preparations for the Russian State Duma elections in December 2011 of 7 July 2011 and the one on the Rule of Law in Russia of 17 February 2011,
– ob upoštevanju posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah med EU in Rusijo ter zlasti zadnjega srečanja v Bruslju 29. novembra 2011,
– having regard to the EU-Russia Consultations on Human Rights and in particular to the latest meeting held in Brussels on 29 November 2011,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije št. 1728 parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope z dne 29. aprila 2010 o diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in spolne identitete ter priporočila sveta ministrov CM/Rec(2010)5 z dne 31. marca 2010 o ukrepih za boj proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti ali spolne identitete,
– having regard to the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly resolution 1728 of 29 April 2010 on Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity, and the Committee of Ministers recommendation CM/Rec(2010)5 of 31 March 2010 on measures to combat discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation or gender identity,
– ob upoštevanju končne izjave in priporočil, objavljenih ob zaključku 14. srečanja parlamentarnega odbora za sodelovanje med EU in Rusijo, ki je potekalo 19. in 20. septembra 2011 v Varšavi,
– having regard to the final statement and recommendations issued at the close of the 14th meeting of the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee, held on 19-20 September 2011 in Warsaw,
– ob upoštevanju srečanja foruma evro-ruske civilne družbe, ki je potekalo v Varšavi 1. in 2. decembra 2011,
– having regard to the meeting of the EU-Russia Civil Society Forum held in Warsaw on 1/2 December 2011,
A. ker nedavni dogovor med Gruzijo in Rusko federacijo odpira vrata za vključitev Rusije v Svetovno trgovinsko organizacijo ter odpravlja glavno oviro za okrepitev gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosov med EU in Rusijo; ker kljub čedalje večji trgovinski in gospodarski soodvisnosti v političnih odnosih zaradi nerazumevanja in nezaupanja glede temeljnih političnih in gospodarskih vprašanj ni mogoče opaziti napredka, kar preprečuje, da bi strani zgradili pravo strateško partnerstvo;
A. whereas the recent agreement reached by Georgia and the Russian Federation paves the way for Russia's accession to the World Trade Organisation and removes the main obstacle to the deepening of economic and trade relations between the EU and Russia; whereas in spite of the growing trade and economic interdependence political relations are not moving forward due to misunderstanding and mistrust on fundamental issues that have prevented the parties from building a genuine strategic partnership;
B. ker so okrepljeno sodelovanje in dobri sosedski odnosi med EU in Rusijo bistveni za stabilnost, varnost ter blaginjo Evrope; ker lahko razvoj strateškega partnerstva med EU in Rusko federacijo temelji le na skupnih vrednotah; ker je bistveno, da partnerici okrepita sodelovanje na mednarodni ravni v vseh institucijah, organizacijah in forumih, da bi izboljšali upravljanje na svetovni ravni in začeli obravnavati skupne izzive;
B. whereas enhanced cooperation and good-neighbourly relations between the EU and Russia are crucial for the stability, security and prosperity of Europe; whereas the development of a strategic partnership between the EU and the Russian Federation can only be built on shared common values; whereas it is of the utmost importance to step up cooperation at international level between the two partners in all institutions, organisations and forums with a view to improving global governance and address common challenges;
C. ker je stranka Združena Rusija na svojem kongresu 27. novembra uradno potrdila kandidaturo nekdanjega predsednika Putina na predsedniških volitvah, načrtovanih za marec 2012; ker je aktualni predsednik ruske vlade Putin v svojem govoru zahodne države posvaril, naj se ne vmešavajo v ruske volitve in naj prenehajo denarno pomagati nevladnim organizacijam in kritikom Kremlja;
C. whereas on 27 November United Russia party congress endorsed formally the candidature of former president Putin for the presidential elections scheduled for March 2012; whereas during his speech present prime minister Putin warned Western countries not to interfere in Russian elections and to stop providing financial aid to NGOs and critics of the Kremlin;
D. ker je poštenost volitev, ki so potekale 4. decembra, resno vprašljiva, saj niso bili izpolnjeni nekateri od osnovnih pogojev za izvedbo volitev, kot so javne razprave, svoboda tiska ter enaki pogoji za vse politične sile v državi, poleg tega pa so bile opažene tudi resne nepravilnosti pri imenovanju delegatov in registraciji strank ter pomanjkanje enakih možnosti za kampanjo;
D. whereas the fairness of the elections held on 4 December was gravely put into question since some of the basic conditions for holding elections such as public debate, a free press and equal conditions for all political forces in the country were not respected and, furthermore, serious obstacles were registered as regards the nomination of delegates and registration of parties, as well as lack of equal opportunities to campaign;
E. ker je moskovsko tožilstvo 1. decembra 2011 sprožilo upravni postopek in oglobilo organizacijo Golos, najbolj izkušeno rusko organizacijo za spremljanje volitev, z obrazložitvijo, da je kršila volilne zakone, ker je odprla spletno stran za prijavo volilnih goljufij in nepravilnosti;
E. whereas on 1 December 2011 the Prosecutor’s Office in Moscow opened an administrative case and fined Association Golos, Russian most experienced election monitoring group, charging that the organization has violated election laws by establishing a website for registration of election fraud and irregularities;
F. ker je opazovalna misija OVSE/ODIHR glede dneva volitev navedla, da „se je kakovost procesa znatno poslabšala med štetjem glasov, med katerim je prišlo do številnih postopkovnih kršitev in primerov očitne manipulacije, vključno z več resnimi znaki polnjenja volilnih skrinjic z glasovnicami“; ker je policija pridržala več sto opozicijskih aktivistov, ki so 4. decembra ter naslednje dni v Moskvi, Sankt Peterburgu in drugih ruskih mestih poskušali organizirati zborovanja proti poteku volitev;
F. whereas as regards the election day the OSCE/ODIHR stated that the ‘quality of the process deteriorated considerably during the count, which was characterised by frequent procedural violations and instances of apparent manipulation, including several serious indications of ballot box stuffing’; whereas the police detained hundreds of opposition activists who attempted to hold rallies on 4 December and the following days in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other Russian cities to protest against the running of the elections;
G. ker se je 10. decembra na moskovskem trgu Bolotnaja v največjem protestu po padcu Sovjetske zveze zbralo najmanj 50 000 ljudi, ki so zahtevali razveljavitev volilnih rezultatov z dne 4. decembra, nove volitve, odstop predsednika volilne komisije Vladimirja Čurova, preiskavo o domnevnih volilnih goljufijah in takojšnjo izpustitev aretiranih protestnikov; ker so podobne demonstracije potekale tudi v drugih ruskih mestih;
G. whereas on 10 December at least 50 000 people rallied in Bolotnaya square in Moscow in the biggest protest since the fall of the Soviet Union calling for the cancellation of 4 December election results, new elections, the resignation of electoral commission chief Vladimir Churov, an investigation into the alleged ballot-rigging and the immediate release of arrested protesters; whereas similar demonstrations took place in other Russian cities;
H. ker sta EU in Rusija junija 2010 sprejeli skupno izjavo o prednostnih nalogah novega partnerstva za modernizacijo, namenjenega posodobitvi gospodarstev in družb na obeh straneh; ker je v zvezi s tem niso bili sprejeti skoraj nobeni ukrepi glede nekaterih delov delovnega načrta, vključno s konkretnimi predlogi in projekti za sodelovanje in pomoč na področju človekovih pravic in pravne države;
H. whereas in June 2010 the EU and Russia adopted a joint declaration on the priorities of the new Partnership for Modernisation aimed at modernising the economies and the societies of both parties; whereas, in this regard, the parts of the work plan including concrete proposals and projects for cooperation and assistance in the field of human rights and rule of law had little substantial follow-up;
I. ker je energija ključni instrument ruske zunanje politike ter še naprej igra osrednjo in strateško vlogo v odnosih med EU in Rusijo; ker velika odvisnost EU od fosilnih goriv ogroža razvoj uravnoteženega in doslednega pristopa Evrope do Rusije, ki bi temeljil na vrednotah; ker tekmovalnost med EU in Rusijo pri energetskih vprašanjih narašča na področjih skupnega interesa, kot sta južni Kavkaz in osrednja Azija; ker je bistveno, da EU nastopi enotno in pokaže močno notranjo solidarnost;
I. whereas energy is a key instrument of Russian foreign policy and continues to play a central and strategic role in EU-Russia relations; whereas the EU’s strong dependency on fossil fuels undermines the development of a balanced, coherent and value-driven European approach vis-à-vis Russia; whereas the competition between the EU and Russia on energy matters is increasing in areas of common interest like the South Caucasus and Central Asia; whereas it is of the utmost importance for the EU to speak with one voice and show strong internal solidarity;
J. ker je več področij vzajemno koristnega energetskega sodelovanja med EU in Rusijo trenutno zapostavljenih, kot na primer energetska učinkovitost in raziskave na področju tehnologij obnovljivih virov energije;
J. whereas several areas of cooperation with mutual benefit in the field of energy between the EU and Russia are currently neglected, as for example on energy efficiency or research in renewable energy technologies;