natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi bilo v interesu državljanov BiH in bi odražalo njihovo željo izogniti se konfliktom v prihodnosti, če bi se na državni ravni oblikovala nacionalna komisija za resnico in spravo, ki bi morala obravnavati zlorabe iz preteklosti in o njih poročati ter pripraviti priporočila za ukrepe, potrebne za soočanje s to bolečo izkušnjo in preprečevanje, da bi se karkoli podobno nečloveškega ponovilo;
Takes the view that it would be in the interests of the citizens of BiH, and would reflect their desire to avoid conflict in the future, if a national truth and reconciliation commission were established for the country, which should examine and report on the abuses suffered in the past as well as developing recommendations for steps to be taken to deal with this painful legacy and to prevent the recurrence of any such inhumanity;
poudarja, da sta vzgoja in izobraževanje osnovni sredstvi sprave; meni, da bi se morala mlada generacija v BiH bi soočiti s preteklostjo in se iz nje naučiti, da je prihodnost v preseganju ločevanja, spodbujanju medsebojnega razumevanja in podpiranju vrednot solidarnosti, tolerance, demokracije, človekovih pravic in enakosti med državljani države, kot so to storili mladi v Evropi po drugi svetovni vojni;
Points out that education is the primary vehicle for reconciliation; considers that the young generation in BiH should come to grips with the past and learn from it, as did young people in Europe after World War II, that the future lies in overcoming divisions, promoting mutual understanding and furthering the values of solidarity, tolerance, democracy, human rights and equality among the citizens of the country;
v tem kontekstu poziva k uvedbi šolskih delavnic za medetnično vrstniško posredovanje in etnično mešanih razredov, kar je lahko način preseganja uradne in neuradne segregacije v izobraževalnem sistemu Federacije Bosne in Hercegovine;
Refers in this context to the development of inter-ethnic peer mediation courses in schools and of integrated classes as a way of overcoming formal and informal segregation in the education system of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina;
zato svari pred vsakim poskusom, da bi se v BiH oblikovala enoetnična območja; opozarja politike BiH, da mednarodna skupnost ne bo dovoljevala takšnih ukrepov ali politik, ki bi neposredno ali posredno ogrožali večetnični značaj, ozemeljsko celovitost, stabilnost ter enotnost BiH in njenih entitet; poziva visokega predstavnika za BiH, naj še posebej pazi na ta vidik in naj odločneje spodbuja ponovno vključevanje beguncev in razseljenih oseb po celotnem ozemlju BiH, še zlasti v Republiki Srbski, kjer so podatki o vračanju beguncev in razseljenih oseb nezadovoljivi;
Warns, therefore, against any attempt to carve out, inside BiH, mono-ethnic territories; reminds BiH politicians that the international community will not tolerate any measure or policy undermining, directly or indirectly, the multi-ethnic character, the territorial integrity, the stability and the unity of BiH and of its entities; calls on the High Representative for Bosnia-Herzegovina to remain particularly vigilant in this respect and to be more robust in promoting the re-integration of refugees and displaced people throughout the territory of BiH, and, in particular, in the Republika Srpska, which has a disappointing record as regards returns of refugees and displaced persons;
pozdravlja začetek prvega kroga pogajanj o poenostavitvi vizumskih postopkov med EU in BiH ter pričakuje, da bodo zaključena do junija 2007 in bo tako nov sporazum lahko začel veljati leta 2008; poudarja, da mora biti končni cilj poenostavitev potovanj v EU za vse državljane držav zahodnega Balkana, in poziva Komisijo, naj podpira ta proces, predvsem z ukrepi, usmerjenimi v krepitev policijskega sodelovanja in sodelovanja na področju nadzora meja;
Welcomes the opening of the first round of negotiations between the EU and BiH on visa facilitation and looks forward to their conclusion by June 2007, so that the agreement may enter into force in 2008; emphasises that the ultimate objective must be to facilitate travel to the EU for all citizens of the Western Balkan countries and calls on the Commission to support this process, notably through measures aimed at strengthening cooperation in the field of police and border control;
pozdravlja vlogo, ki so jo igrale sile Evropske unije v BiH (EUFOR) pri zagotavljanju varnosti v BiH; meni, da je odločitev o zmanjšanju števila enot, ki jo je pred kratkim sprejel Svet, jasen znak večje stabilnosti v regiji;
Welcomes the role played by the European Union Force in Bosnia and Herzegovina (EUFOR) in providing a safe and secure environment in BiH; considers that the reduction in the number of troops recently decided upon by the Council constitutes a clear sign of increased stability in the region;
želi pohvaliti delo, ki ga je opravila policijska misija EU v Bosni in Hercegovini pri podpori razvoju sodobnih in učinkovitih policijskih sil v BiH; meni, da bi bilo treba tudi prihodnost te misije obravnavati ob upoštevanju napredka, doseženega pri reformi policije;
Commends the work done by the EU Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina in supporting the development of a modern and efficient police force in BiH; takes the view that the future of that mission should also be considered in the light of the progress made in the police reform;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je BiH podpisala številne mednarodne konvencije in sprejela več zakonov, namenjenih zagotavljanju in podpiranju pravic žensk; poziva vlado BiH, naj nadaljuje svoja prizadevanja v smeri dejanskega izvajanja načel, določenih v teh mednarodnih in nacionalnih instrumentih;
Welcomes the fact that BiH has signed many international conventions and passed several laws aimed at guaranteeing and promoting women's rights; urges the government of BiH to pursue its efforts towards implementing in practice the principles laid down in those international and national instruments;
ob upoštevanju negotovosti, ki je še vedno povezana s prihodnostjo BiH, podpira odločitev sveta za uresničevanje miru, da ponovno preuči svojo odločitev z dne 23. junija 2006 in ohrani urad visokega predstavnika z vsemi njegovimi pristojnostmi do junija 2008; meni, da bi se moralo podaljšanje mandata izkoristiti tudi za prenos več pristojnosti na lokalne oblasti; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Svet sprejelskupni ukrep za posebnega predstavnika EU v Bosni in Hercegovini, ki razširja pogoje tega mandata in s tem posebnemu predstavniku določa jasno vlogo pri pospeševanju ustavne reforme v BiH;
In the light of the uncertainties which still surround BiH's future, supports the decision of the PIC to reconsider its decision of 23 June 2006 and to maintain the OHR with its full prerogatives until June 2008; takes the view that this extension should also be used to hand over more responsibilities to the local authorities; welcomes the fact that the Council has adopted a joint action for the EU Special Representative in Bosnia–Herzegovina which extends the terms of that mandate in order to give the Special Representative a clear role in furthering the constitutional reforms in BiH;
meni tudi, da mora EU po tem, ko bo urad visokega predstavnika prenehal delovati, zagotoviti močno in usklajeno podporo BiH, da bo lahko čim prej in kolikor je mogoče temeljito dosegla svoj dolgoročni cilj evropskega povezovanja; meni, da mora visoki predstavnik EU odločno nastopiti v imenu Evropske unije, med drugim pri usklajevanju vseh institucij in agencij EU in BiH;
Is also of the opinion that, when the OHR eventually closes down, the EU must provide strong and coordinated support to help BiH to achieve its long-term aim of European integration as quickly and thoroughly as possible; considers that the EU Special Representative must speak up forcefully on behalf of the European Union inter alia when coordinating all the institutions and agencies of the EU in BiH;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu za splošne zadeve in v vednost Komisiji, posebnemu predstavniku EU/visokemu predstavniku za Bosno in Hercegovino ter vladam in parlamentom Bosne in Hercegovine, Republike srbske in Federacije Bosne in Hercegovine.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the General Affairs Council and, for information, to the Commission, the EU Special Representative/High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina and the governments and parliaments of Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the Republika Srpska and of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. marca 2007 o spoštovanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije: metodologija sistematičnega in strogega nadzora ( 2005/2169(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 15 March 2007 on compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Commission's legislative proposals: methodology for systematic and rigorous monitoring ( 2005/2169(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o spoštovanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije ( KOM(2005)0172 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on Compliance with the Charter of Fundamental Rights in Commission legislative proposals ( COM(2005)0172 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),
, razglašene 7. decembra 2000 v Nici,
proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustavi za Evropo (ustavne pogodbe), podpisane 29. oktobra 2004 v Rimu, ki vsebuje določbe Listine o temeljnih pravicah z namenom, da te postanejo pravno zavezujoče,
having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (the constitutional treaty) signed in Rome on 29 October 2004, which incorporates the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, in order to make them legally binding,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o členu 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji: spoštovanje in spodbujanje temeljnih vrednot Evropske unije UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the Commission communication on Article 7 of the Treaty on European Union: Respect for and promotion of the values on which the European Union is based OJ C 104E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila za leto 2005 o stanju na področju temeljnih pravic Evropske unije, ki ga je pripravila mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov Evropske unije,
having regard to the 2005 Annual Report on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union, drawn up by the EU network of independent experts,
in izjave Sveta o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah,
and the Declaration by the Council on Police and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters,
ob upoštevanju govora Joséja Manuela Barrosa v njegovi takratni funkciji imenovanega predsednika Komisije na plenarnem zasedanju Parlamenta 17. novembra 2004,
having regard to the speech by Mr José Manuel Barroso, in his then capacity as President-designate of the Commission, at Parliament's plenary sitting of 17 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju členov 45, 34 in 91 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 45, 34 and 91 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0034/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0034/2007 ),
ker Unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin kot tudi na načelu pravne države, ta načela pa so skupna vsem državam članicam (člen 6 Pogodbe EU),
whereas the Union is based on the principles of freedom, democracy, respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms as well as on the rule of law, these principles being common to all Member States (Article 6 of the TEU),
ker nosi Evropski parlament kot neposredno izvoljeno zastopstvo državljank in državljanov Unije pri uresničevanju teh načel še posebej veliko odgovornost,
whereas Parliament, as the directly elected representative of the citizens of the Union, has a particularly prominent responsibility in the realisation of these principles,
ker je ta odgovornost še toliko večja, saj v sedanjih pogodbah:
whereas this responsibility is all the greater because, as the Treaties currently stand:
pravica posameznikov do vložitve neposredne tožbe pri evropskem sodišču ostaja zelo omejena Sodba Sodišča z dne 25. julija 2002 v zadevi C-50/00 P, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores proti Svetu Evropske unije, zbirka 2002, I-6677.
the right of individuals to bring an action directly before the European courts remains very limited Judgment of the Court of 25 July 2002 in Case C-50/00, Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v. Council of the European Union, [2002] ECR I-6677.
niso mogoče skupinske tožbe ("collective action"),
collective action is not possible,
zaradi česar mora biti evropski zakonodajalec toliko bolj previden pri sprejemanju predpisov, ki lahko vplivajo na zaščito temeljnih svoboščin,
which makes it all the more necessary for the European legislature to take care when legislating on matters which might affect the protection of fundamental rights,
ker predstavlja postopek za preverjanje združljivosti vseh zakonodajnih predlogov z Listino o temeljnih pravicah eno od nujnih posledic, ki so izšle iz sprejetja Listine s strani Parlamenta, Sveta, Komisije in vseh držav članic, kakor tudi iz njene slavnostne razglasitve pred državljankami in državljani EU 7. decembra 2000 v Nici,
whereas a procedure for checking the compatibility of all legislative proposals with the Charter of Fundamental Rights is one of the necessary consequences which have arisen from the adoption of the Charter by Parliament, the Council, the Commission and all the Member States, as well as from the formal proclamation to EU citizens on 7 December 2000 in Nice,
ker dejanski domet temeljnih pravic, ki izhaja iz uporabe člena 6(2) Pogodbe EU, še vedno ostaja predvsem stvar sodne razlage, zato pa bi moral evropski zakonodajalec jasno opredeliti način razlage teh pravic,
whereas the effective scope of fundamental rights arising from the application of Article 6(2) of the TEU is to this day primarily the product of case-law, but whereas the European legislature should also explicitly state how these rights should be interpreted,
ker so se Parlament, Svet in Komisija ob sprejetju Listine o temeljnih pravicah dogovorili o opredelitvi teh pravic in ker jih bodo morali za nesporno zagotavljanje skladnosti in v luči dobrih namenov v prihodnje upoštevati pri oblikovanju zakonodaje ES (glej zgoraj navedeno sporočilo Komisije ( KOM(2005)0172 )),
whereas, by adopting the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed on definitions of these rights and whereas, for obvious reasons of consistency and good faith, they should in future refer to them when drafting EC legislation (cf. the above-mentioned Commission Communication COM(2005)0172 )),
ker postanejo v Listini zapisane pravice s tem, ko so prevzete v pravo Unije, zavezujoče z vidika zakonodaje ES, ki temelji na njej,
whereas, once incorporated in the law of the Union, the rights defined in the Charter acquire binding force by virtue of the EC law based thereon,
ker imajo sistematičnost, temeljitost, objektivnost, odprtost in preglednost postopka spoštovanja temeljnih pravic v zakonodajnih predlogih še toliko večji pomen, saj Listina o temeljnih pravicah na žalost vse do danes ni postala pravno zavezujoča; ker pa je Listina o temeljnih pravicah v teku let postala referenčno besedilo, po katerem se zgledujejo evropska sodišča, kot so Sodišče prve stopnje, Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti Sodba Sodišča z dne 27. junija 2006 v zadevi C-540/03, Evropski parlament proti Svetu Evropske unije mladoletnih otrok državljanov tretjih držav do združitve družine (Direktiva 2003/86/ES).
whereas the systematic nature, thoroughness, objectivity, openness and transparency of the procedure for compliance with fundamental rights in legislative proposals are made all the more important by the fact that, regrettably, the Charter of Fundamental Rights has so far not been made legally binding; whereas over the years the Charter has nonetheless become a reference text for European courts such as the Court of First Instance, the Court of Justice Case C-540/03 of 27 June 2006, European Parliament v. Council of the European Union, on the right to family reunification for minor children of third-country nationals (Directive 2003/86/EC).
, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice v Strasbourgu kot tudi številna ustavna sodišča,
, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and numerous constitutional courts,
ker mora evropski zakonodajalec pri oblikovanju predhodne ocene o vplivu nove zakonodaje ES na temeljne pravice k sodelovanju povabiti nacionalne zakonodajalce, civilno družbo in predstavnike znanstvenih ustanov ter drugih mednarodnih organizacij, kot so Svet Evrope in Združeni narodi; ker bi evropski zakonodajalec na ta način, kot je to že storil pri nekaterih aktih s področja zaščite zasebnega življenja, pravice do družine in pravice do preglednosti, spodbujal širitev kulture temeljnih pravic,
whereas, when making a prior assessment of the impact which new EC legislation will have on fundamental rights, the European legislature should take account of the views of national legislatures, civil society, academia and the expertise of other international organisations such as the Council of Europe and the United Nations; whereas in this way the European legislature would promote the development of an ever more widespread culture of fundamental rights, as was the case when certain acts were drafted relating to the protection of private life, the right to family life and the right to transparency,
ker predstavlja predlog Komisije o poglobitvi in boljši obveščenosti javnosti o postopku spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, ki je začel veljati leta 2001, znaten napredek pri njenem prizadevanju za razvoj resnične "kulture temeljnih pravic" v Evropski uniji,
whereas the Commission's proposal on the consolidation and better public awareness of the procedure, for compliance with fundamental rights in legislative proposals, which came into force in 2001, represents clear progress in its project to develop a genuine 'fundamental rights culture' in the European Union,
ker je ta postopek obrnjen preveč navznoter, ker so merila prestroga, ker vloga Parlamenta ni zadostna in ker predlogi o vključitvi parlamentov držav članic, kot recimo predlogi britanskega zgornjega doma Britanski zgornji dom, Odbor EU, 16. poročilo, zasedanje 2005–06, "Human rights proofing EU legislation", 29. november 2005, odstavek 149.
whereas, however, this procedure is too introverted, the criteria are too restrictive and Parliament's role is not sufficient, and whereas the proposals on the integration of Member State parliaments, such as that of the British House of Lords House of Lords, European Union Committee, 16th Report, Session 2005-06, "Human Rights Proofing EU Legislation", 29 November 2005, paragraph 149.
, ostajajo neupoštevani, prav tako kot nujen stalni dialog med evropskimi institucijami in sodelovanje neodvisnih organizacij zavoljo večje objektivnosti,
, remain unconsidered, as does the much-needed continuous dialogue between the European institutions and collaboration with independent organisations, with a view to increased objectivity,
ker resnična "kultura temeljnih pravic" v Uniji zahteva razvoj skupnega sistema nadzora temeljnih pravic, ki bi vključeval Svet in sklepe na področju medvladnega sodelovanja,
whereas a genuine "fundamental rights culture" in the Union requires the development of an overall system for monitoring fundamental rights, which should include the Council and decisions in the field of intergovernmental cooperation,
ker prava "kultura temeljnih pravic" ne pomeni le pasivnega izpolnjevanja pravil, ampak tudi aktivno spodbujanje temeljnih pravic in posredovanje v primerih kršitve ali nezadostne zaščite temeljnih pravic v državah članicah,
whereas a true "fundamental rights culture" consists not only of passive compliance with the rules, but also of active promotion of fundamental rights and intervention in cases of violation or unsatisfactory protection of fundamental rights by the Member States,
ker mora biti v sklopu skupnega sistema nadzora spoštovanja temeljnih pravic predvideno letno posvetovanje treh institucij in nacionalnih parlamentov, zlasti potem ko Parlament preuči dosežen napredek in probleme, ki se pojavljajo pri razvoju EU kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
whereas an overall system for monitoring fundamental rights must provide for an annual debate involving the three institutions and national parliaments, particularly when Parliament reviews the progress made and the problems encountered in the development of the EU as an area of freedom, security and justice,
ker bi bilo v okviru takšnega posvetovanja mogoče preučiti tudi sledeče:
whereas in such a debate it would be possible to consider:
letno poročilo Agencije za temeljne pravice,
the annual report of the Fundamental Rights Agency,
posebno poročilo Komisije v okviru njenega splošnega poročila o izvajanju prava Skupnosti,
a specific report by the Commission as part of its general report on the implementation of Community law,
poročilo Sveta o vprašanjih, ki jih je v preteklem letu ocenil kot pomembne za spoštovanje temeljnih pravic znotraj Unije in s strani držav članic,
a report by the Council on the aspects which it regards as having been significant in the past year with reference to respect for fundamental rights in the Union and by its Member States,
ker bi morale institucije na teh vsakoletnih posvetovanjih preveriti možnosti za spremembo zakonodaje, ki zaradi zagotavljanja javne varnosti morebiti krči pravice,
whereas on the occasion of these annual debates the institutions should review the desirability of revising legislation which has restricted the exercise of freedoms on public security grounds,
ker obstoj skrivnih zaporov in ilegalnih ugrabitev, ki jih izvaja CIA v okviru boja proti terorizmu, počasna preiskava in pomanjkljivo sodelovanje več vlad, ali pa prenos podatkov o letalskih potnikih in o bančnih računih prek organizacije SWIFT brez zakonske podlage samo zmanjšujeta zaupanje državljank in državljanov v sposobnost in voljo evropskih institucij, da ščitijo temeljne pravice in kaznujejo kršitve,
whereas the existence of secret prisons and the illegal kidnappings by the CIA as part of counter-terrorism operations, the dilatory investigation and lack of cooperation on the part of several governments, or the transfer of airline passenger data and bank account data by SWIFT without legal basis only serve to undermine the confidence of citizens in the ability and will of the European institutions to protect fundamental rights and to punish infractions,
opozarja na zgodovinsko nalogo, da je treba pri "oblikovanju vse tesnejše zveze" (člen 1 Pogodbe EU) poleg razvoja instrumentov varnosti in prava ter gospodarskega in družbenega napredka oblikovati tudi instrumente svobode;
Points to the historical task, in 'creating an ever closer Union' (Article 1 of the TEU ), of creating instruments for freedom alongside the development of instruments for security and justice and for economic and social progress;
poudarja, da je treba premagati krizo ustavnega procesa, ohraniti glavne dosežke ustavne pogodbe in zagotoviti, da bo Listina o temeljnih pravicah pravno zavezujoča;
Stresses the need to overcome the crisis in the constitutional process, to preserve the central achievements of the constitutional treaty, and to establish the Charter of Fundamental Rights as legally binding;