natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja splošni trend za skrajšanje povprečnega časa do dodelitve in do plačila, ima pa nekatere zadržke do splošne uporabe razpisov s širšim obsegom in razpisov z navedenim skrajnim rokom; vendar ugotavlja, da so ti razpisi primerni za mala in srednja podjetja kot način zmanjševanja negotovosti glede možnosti financiranja in spodbujanja k nadaljnjemu sodelovanju;
Welcomes the overall trend towards shortening the average time-to-grant and time-to-pay but expresses some reservations about the generalised use of larger-scope calls and calls with cut-off dates; recognizes, however, that such calls are appropriate for SMEs as a means of decreasing uncertainty on funding opportunities and of encouraging further participation;
ga skrbi, da sedaj obdobje od predlaganega roka do podpisa pogodbe (čas pred pogodbo) v povprečju še vedno predolgo traja, med različnimi službami Komisije pa so neskladnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj skrajša čas do pogodbe največ na 6 mesecev in določi ustrezne roke za ocenjevanje in pogajanje o pogodbi na podlagi sistema referenčnih vrednosti;
Expresses its concern that current average time from proposal deadline to signed contract (time-to-contract) is still too long, with discrepancies within different services of the Commission; calls on the Commission to shorten time-to-contract to maximum 6 months and to set appropriate deadlines for evaluation and contract negotiation, based on a benchmark system;
poziva Komisijo, naj podaljša povprečni čas od objave razpisa za zbiranje predlogov do roka za vlogo prijave;
Invites the Commission to extend the average time from the publication of the call for proposals to the deadline for submitting the application;
ima močne zadržke v zvezi s posledicami ukinitve pravnih zahtev za mnenja, ki jih dajo odbori zastopnikov države članice glede odločitev o izboru za posamezne projekte, zlasti tiste, ki vplivajo na etiko, varnost in obrambo;
Has strong reservations about the effects of abolishing the legal requirement for an opinion by committees of Member State representatives on selection decisions on individual projects, especially those with impact on ethics, security and defence;
meni, da pristop za spodbujanje opredeljevanja skupnih temeljnih načel ne bi smel škodovati nacionalnim etičnim možnostim in posebnostim na področju raziskav;
Believes that the approach aimed at favouring the identification of common basic principles should not prejudice national ethical options and specificities in the matter of research;
podpira splošno usmeritev k dvostopenjskemu postopku prijave, zlasti v primerih, ko je pričakovanih predlogov preveč, če na prvi stopnji ocenjevanje poteka temeljito (cilji, znanstveni pristop, kompetence sodelujočih, dodana vrednost znanstvenega sodelovanja in skupnega proračuna); poudarja, da to poveča možnosti uspešnosti na drugi stopnji, če ne gre na račun daljšega časa do pogodbe ali obdobij za dodelitev; meni, da je s tem pristopom mogoče zmanjšati stroške prijave;
Supports the general trend towards a ‘two-stage’ application procedure, particularly in cases where the expected oversubscription is very high, provided that the evaluation is undertaken thoroughly in the first stage (objectives, scientific approach, competences of participants, added value of scientific collaboration and overall budget); stresses that this increases the chances of success at the second stage, provided that it is not at the expense of longer time-to-contract or grant periods; believes that this approach reduces application costs;
Premik k pristopu, ki je glede dostopnosti usmerjen k uporabniku
Shifting to a ‘user-centred’ approach in terms of access
poudarja, da je treba pri upravljanju okvirnega programa postaviti upravičence v osredje svojih nalog in zagotoviti boljšo dostopnost do okvirnega programa;
Underlines that the FP management must place beneficiaries at the centre of its missions and provide better access to FP;
poziva, naj se bistveno izboljša jasnost in dostopnost dokumentov z navodili, ki bi jih treba zbrati v priročniku in prevesti v uradne jezike EU;
Calls for a substantive improvement in the clarity and accessibility of guidance documents, which should be compiled in a handbook and translated into the EU official languages;
poudarja, da je treba povečati sodelovanje novih držav članic v projektih okvirnega programa, in sicer tako, da se poenostavi postopek prijave in pogodbeni postopki, ki pomenijo bistveno oviro za vstop na stopnji predloga, zlasti za tiste, ki se prijavljajo prvič;
Stresses the need for increasing participation by the new Member States in FP projects by means of simplification of the application and contractual procedures, which represent significant obstacles to entry at the proposal stage, in particular for first-time applicants;
priporoča, da se izboljša stabilnost, ki se zagotavlja zainteresiranim stranem, tako da se v mejah mogočega določi samo en uradnik Komisije za projekte, ki bo nudil posamezniku prilagojeno podporo ves čas poteka projekta z doslednim izvajanjem pravil pa tudi pristopa „enotnega okenca“, po katerem je mogoče dobiti nasvete o mnogovrstnih programih na eni kontaktni točki;
Recommends improving the stability provided to stakeholders by having, as far as possible, one single Commission project officer, delivering personalised support throughout the lifetime of a project with consistent implementation of rules, as well as a ‘one face to the customer’ approach, in which advice on multiple programmes can be received from just one contact point;
zahteva, da je na vsakem dokumentu, ki ga zagotovi Komisija in njene službe, jasno opredeljeno, kakšen je njegov pravni status, in koga zavezuje njegova vsebina in kako;
Requests that each document provided by the Commission and its services should clearly establish its legal status, specifying both who is bound by its content and how they are bound;
podpira nadaljnje uvajanje e-uprave in orodij informacijske tehnologije ter zlasti razvoj portala za udeležence raziskav ter uvedbo elektronskega podpisa; poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi povezan in uporabnikom prijazen internetni sistem; podpira, da se dajo na razpolago vse elektronske informacije o upravljanju programa (identifikacija, prijava, pogajanje in poročilo); se zavzema, da je ta internetni sistem na razpolago od prvega dne programa in dostopen na vseh stopnjah; meni, da bi bilo treba spodbujati nadomestitev osebnih srečanj z videokonferencami; priporoča, da službe e-uprave za komuniciranje uporabljajo odprte protokole in formate in tako zagotavljajo preglednost, dostopnost in interoperabilnost;
Supports the introduction of more e-administration and IT tools and, in particular, the development of a research participant portal and the introduction of the e-signature; calls on the Commission to establish an integrated and user-friendly online system; supports making all electronic information on programme management available (identification, application, negotiation and report); supports making this online system available on day one of the programme and accessible at all stages; takes the view that videoconferencing should be promoted to replace face-to-face meetings; recommends that e-administration services use open protocols and formats when communicating so as to ensure transparency, accessibility and interoperability;
priporoča, da Komisija začne z informacijsko kampanjo in kampanja za večjo ozaveščenost o orodjih informacijske tehnologije, ki je na voljo v okviru programa;
Recommends that the Commission launch an information and awareness-raising campaign on the information technology tools available under the programme;
pozdravlja pilotni projekt Komisije o odprtem dostopu, katerega namen je izboljšanje dostopa do rezultatov raziskav prek sistema Cordis in spodbujanja znanstvenikov, da svoje raziskave shranijo v arhivu;
Welcomes the Commission's Open Access Pilot, which aims at improving access to the results of research both through the Cordis system and through encouraging scientists to register their research in a repository;
poudarja, da so za dostop upravičencev do projektov na področju raziskav in inovacij potrebne velike tehnične zmogljivosti ter veliko znanja o upravnih in finančnih postopkih, zato je ta dostop izjemno težek za male prosilce, kot so mala in srednja podjetja ter mali raziskovalni inštituti iz obrobnih regij; opozarja, da je okoli 90 % evropskih podjetij malih in srednjih podjetij ter da jim je treba zagotoviti polno in učinkovito vključitev pri rabi sredstev iz sedmega okvirnega programa;
Stresses that beneficiaries' access to projects in the field of research and innovation requires high technical capacity and strong knowledge of administrative and financial procedures and, therefore, that this access is extremely difficult for smaller applicants such as SMEs and small research institutes located in peripheral regions; recalls that some 90% of businesses in Europe are SMEs and that it is necessary to ensure their full and effective involvement in the use of FP7 resources;
poudarja potrebo po povečanju preglednosti v postopku izbire teme za razpise, kar bi moralo zagotoviti sodelovanje pomembnih zainteresiranih strani;
Stresses the need for increased transparency as regards the process of topic selection for calls which should ensure relevant stakeholder participation;
priporoča uvedbo bolj preglednega, povezanega in usklajenega sistema medsebojnega pregleda na podlagi dosežkov;
Recommends the creation of a more transparent, coherent, and harmonised peer review system based on merit;
poziva k zmanjšanju zapletenosti programov EU (npr. okvirnega programa, programa za konkurenčnost in inovacije, strukturnih skladov) ter z njimi povezanih instrumentov (skupnih tehnoloških pobud, pobud po členu 187, javno-zasebnih partnerstev, projektov po členu 185, skupnosti znanja in inovacij, ERA-NET itd.); poudarja, da bo to imelo za posledico popolno izkoriščenost sinergij, ki izhajajo iz njihovega vzajemnega delovanja;
Urges that the complexity of EU programmes (e.g. FP, CIP, Structural Funds) and associated instruments (JTIs, Article 187 initiatives, PPPs, Article 185 projects, KICs, Era-net etc.) be reduced; stresses that this will lead to full exploitation of synergies resulting from their combined action;
obžaluje izredno povečanje števila raziskovalnih organizacij, modelov sodelovanja in mehanizmov upravljanja, pa tudi zapletenost, ki izhaja iz tega in proračunskemu organu povzroča težave s preglednostjo ter ustvarja razlike v obravnavanju upravičencev;
Regrets the extreme multiplication of research bodies, cooperation models and management mechanisms and the resultant complexity, which creates problems of transparency in relation to the budgetary authority and differences in the treatment of beneficiaries;
priporoča zmanjšanje niza predpisov in skupnih načel za financiranje, ki določajo financiranje EU za raziskave in razvoj, ter poziva k medsebojni povezanosti in usklajenosti pri izvajanju in razlagi predpisov in postopkov; poudarja, da je ta skupni niz pravil treba uporabljati v celotnem okvirnem programu in z njim povezanih instrumentih ter znotraj Komisije, ne glede na subjekt oziroma izvajalsko agencijo, ki je zadolžena za izvajanje;
Recommends a reduced set of rules and common principles for funding to govern EU funding for R&D and calls for coherence and harmonisation in the implementation and interpretation of the rules and procedures; stresses the need to apply this common set of rules across the whole FP and associated instruments and within the Commission, regardless of the entity or executive agency in charge of implementation;
priporoča, da se uvedejo mehanizmi, ki bodo zagotovili skupne smernice znotraj Komisije, ter da se začne z usposabljanjem uradnikov za projekte ter notranjih revizorjev; poziva k uvedbi pritožbenega mehanizma, kot je „posrednik okvirnega programa“, v primerih neskladne in nedosledne razlage predpisov in postopkov; meni, da morajo biti odločitve, ki jih ta posrednik sprejme, dokončne in zavezujoče;
Recommends establishing mechanisms to provide common guidance within the Commission, and launching training for project officers and internal auditors; urges the creation of an appeal mechanism such as an ‘FP mediator’ for participants in cases of incoherent and inconsistent interpretation of rules and procedures; believes that decisions taken by this mediator should be final and binding;
meni, da je za raziskave in inovacije najprimerneje, da se spodbujajo na regionalni ravni, to pa zaradi bližine med univerzami, javnimi raziskovalnimi zavodi, velikimi podjetji, malimi in srednjimi podjetji in regionalnimi javnimi organi, na primer znotraj „grozdov“; poleg tega ugotavlja, da spodbujanje inovacij na regionalni ravni lahko pomaga zmanjšati socialne in regionalne razlike; kljub temu spodbuja različne ravni (regionalno, nacionalno in Skupnosti), naj bolje usklajujejo svoja prizadevanja v okviru načrtovanja raziskovalnih in razvojnih dejavnosti na evropski ravni; prav tako poudarja, da so potrebne boljše povezave med akademskimi krogi in industrijo;
Takes the view that innovation can be best fostered at regional level, thanks to the proximity between universities, public research bodies, large companies, SMEs and regional and local public authorities, for example within clusters; also notes that fostering innovation at the regional level can help reduce social and regional disparities; nonetheless encourages the various levels (regional, national and Community) to coordinate more effectively their efforts to plan R&D activities at European level; also emphasises the need for better links between academia and industry;
Česa se je mogoče naučiti za prihodnji, osmi okvirni program
Lessons to be drawn for the future FP8
meni, da bi korenit pregled upravljanja okvirnega programa ena od najbolj prednostnih nalog, s katero se je treba spoprijeti pri oblikovanju naslednjega;
Believes that a radical overhaul of the administration of the FP is one of the highest priorities to be tackled in designing the forthcoming FP;
meni, da imajo revizija finančne uredbe, kadrovskih predpisov in uporaba za raziskavo specifičnega dopustnega tveganja za napake vodilno vlogo pri prestrukturiranju finančnega okvira za raziskave in pri omogočanju nadaljnjega napredka pri poenostavitvi financiranja raziskav;
Considers that the revision of the Financial Regulation, the Staff Regulations and the implementation of a research-specific TRE have a pivotal role in restructuring the research financing framework and in allowing further progress in simplifying research funding;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni učinkovitost vsakega posameznega instrumenta znotraj vsakega programa glede na doseganje specifičnih političnih ciljev, in poziva k zmanjšanju raznolikosti instrumentov, če ni jasnega dokaza za njihovo učinkovitost ali njihov posebni prispevek, hkrati pa ohrani dovolj prilagodljivosti, da ohrani posebnosti projektov;
Invites the Commission to assess the effectiveness of each individual instrument, within each programme, towards the achievement of specific policy goals, and calls for a reduction in the diversity of instruments whenever effectiveness or distinctive contribution is not clearly demonstrated, whilst maintaining enough flexibility to accommodate projects' specificities;
podpira sistem financiranja, ki temelji na znanosti, ter uravnoteženo ločevanje med raziskavami od zgoraj navzdol, usmerjenimi k učinkom, ter raziskavami od spodaj navzgor, usmerjenimi v znanost, kot podlago za osmi okvirni program;
Supports a science-based funding system and a well balanced division between top-down, impact-driven and bottom-up, science-driven research as the basis for FP8;
meni, da bi bilo treba v osmem okvirnem programu dati prednost pionirskim raziskavam obenem pa upoštevati celotno verigo inovacij prek pionirskih raziskav, tehnološkega razvoja, predstavitev, razširjanja, vrednotenja rezultatov in hitrega prenosa rezultatov raziskav na trge;
Believes that FP8 should focus on frontier research while taking into consideration the whole chain of innovation through frontier research, technological development, demonstration, dissemination, valorisation of results and rapid integration of research results into markets;
meni, da bi moral osmi okvirni program spodbujati sodelovanje med evropskimi raziskovalci z uvedbo sistema „raziskovalnih bonov“ z denarjem za raziskave, ki bi spremljal raziskovalce, ki se selijo med univerzami v državah članicah in s tem prispeval k ustvarjanju centrov odličnosti, neodvisnih univerz in povečanju mobilnosti raziskovalcev;
Believes that FP8 should encourage collaboration between European researchers by introducing a research voucher scheme with money for research following researchers who move to universities across the Member States, contributing to centres of excellence, independent universities and increased mobility among researchers;
poziva Komisijo, naj objavi analizo ravni sodelovanja različnih držav članic v sedmem okvirnem programu in upošteva zaključke, da bi zagotovila uravnotežen razvoj raziskav v vseh državah članicah v osmem;
Asks the Commission to publish an analysis of the participation levels of different Member States in FP7 and to take the conclusions into account in order to ensure a balanced research development across the Member States in FP8;
meni, da bi bilo treba pri določanju prednostnih nalog za osmi okvirni program posebej upoštevati druge možnosti za financiranje inovacij, ki ne temeljijo na subvencijah, tudi javno-zasebni kapital in naložbe v dolžniški kapital
Believes that in setting the priorities for FP8, consideration should be given to the wider non-grant-based funding alternatives for innovation including public-private venture and loan capital investments;
priporoča nadaljnjo internacionalizacijo osmega okvirnega programa prek sodelovanja s tretjimi državami, tudi z državami v razvoju, tako da se jim zagotovijo enostavna in posebna pravila upravljanja; v načrtovanju prihajajočega osmega okvirnega programa spodbuja izmenjavo najboljših praks in standardov z vsemi preostalimi mednarodnimi partnerji;
Recommends further internationalisation of FP8 through cooperation with third countries, including developing countries, providing them with simple and specific management rules; encourages, in anticipation of the upcoming FP8, the exchange of best practices and standards with all other international partners;
podpira vlogo Komisije kot nadzornika dostopa, ko je potrebno financiranje, ki ga zagotavljajo nacionalni ali regionalni organi;
Supports the role of the Commission as gatekeeper when financing from national or regional authorities is required;
pozdravlja ustanovitev podskupine Komisije za inovacije ter njene razprave o tem, kako izmeriti učinkovitost politike EU o raziskavah in razvoju ter s tem povezane porabe za projekte raziskav in razvoja;
Welcomes the setting up of the Commission's innovation subgroup, and its discussions on how to measure the effectiveness of EU R&D policy and related spending on R&D projects;
B7-0605 , 0606 in 0612/2010
B7-0605 , 0606 and 0612/2010
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. julija 2010 o prihodnosti skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0286 .
having regard to its resolution of 8 July 2010 on the future of the Common Agricultural Policy after 2013 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0286 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 7. septembra 2010 o poštenih prihodkih za kmete: bolje delujoča veriga preskrbe s hrano v Evropi Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0302 .
having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2010 on fair revenues for farmers: a better functioning food supply chain in Europe Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0302 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010 o vrednotenju in oceni akcijskega načrta za zaščito in dobro počutje živali 2006-2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0130 .
having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2010 on evaluation and assessment of the animal welfare action plan 2006-2010 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0130 .
ker sposobnost za preživetje številnih živinorejskih gospodarstev EU sedaj resno ogroža skupek dejavnikov, ki vključuje:
whereas the viability of many EU livestock holdings is being seriously threatened at present by a combination of factors, which include:
vedno večji stroški vložkov, kot so gorivo in gnojila,
the rising costs of inputs, such as fuel and fertilisers,
visoke stroške spoštovanja uredb EU,
the high cost of complying with EU regulations,
večja konkurenca uvozov iz tretjih držav,
greater competition from third-country imports,
odvisnost od tretjih držav glede posameznih krmil,
a dependence on third countries for feed material,
nedavno povečanje cen žita, zlasti zaradi nepredvidenih podnebnih razmer, pa tudi negativnega vpliva špekulacij in nihanja cen,
the recent surge in cereals prices, due particularly to unforeseen climatic conditions and the negative impact of speculation and price volatility,
nizke cene, ki se plačujejo kmetom za mesne izdelke,
the low prices being received by farmers for meat products,
ker morajo evropski proizvajalci upoštevati najstrožje predpise na svetu za varnost in kakovost hrane, okolje, zdravje in dobro počutje živali ter delovne pogoje; ker izpolnjevanje teh zelo visokih standardov znatno prispeva k proizvodnim stroškom evropskih proizvajalcev, in so zato v konkurenčno podrejenem položaju v primerjavi s proizvajalci iz tretjih držav,
whereas European producers must comply with the most stringent regulations in the world in terms of food safety and quality, the environment, animal health and welfare and labour conditions; whereas meeting these extremely high standards adds significantly to the production costs of European producers, leaving them at a competitive disadvantage vis-à-vis third-country producers,
ker lahko sedanja kriza v živinorejskem sektorju povzroči občutno zmanjšanje proizvodnje mesa v Evropski uniji, kar bo imelo resne posledice ne samo za cene ampak tudi za zanesljivo preskrbo s hrano v EU in bo pomenilo večjo odvisnost od uvoza,
whereas the current crisis in the livestock sector may lead to a significant reduction in meat production across the European Union, which will have serious consequences, not only for prices but also for food security in the EU, and will result in greater dependence on imports,
ker je Evropska unija močno odvisna od sojinih zrn in koruze, ki se uvažajo iz tretjih držav, in ker je vsaka prekinitev dobave teh proizvodov zaradi najmanjše prisotnosti prepovedanih gensko spremenjenih organizmov zelo draga za evropsko industrijo krme in za živinorejce (če na primer motnja traja šest mesecev, znašajo stroški 1 milijardo EUR);
whereas the European Union is highly dependent on soya beans and maize imported from third countries, and whereas any interruption of the supply of these products resulting from a minute presence of non-authorized GMOs has a very costly impact on the European feed industry and livestock farmers (for example, EUR 1 billion if the disruption lasts six months),
ker uvoz iz tretjih držav pridobiva na deležu trga Evropske unije, kar povzroča dodaten pritisk na tržne cene živinorejskih proizvodov,
whereas imports from third countries have been gaining market shares in the European Union and putting further pressure on market prices for livestock products,
ker se bo v prihodnjih desetletjih povečalo svetovno povpraševanje po mesu in drugih živinorejskih proizvodih zaradi skupnega učinka rasti svetovnega prebivalstva in naraščajoče kupne moči v državah v razvoju, kar bo privedlo do zahodnjaškega načina prehranjevanja v teh državah,
whereas world demand for meat and other livestock products will rise in the coming decades, owing to a combination of a growing world population and increasing purchasing power in developing countries, leading to the adoption of a westernised diet,
ker so za živinorejski sektor potrebne velike naložbe in je zato še posebno občutljiv na tržne krize,
whereas the large-scale investments required in the livestock sector make it particularly vulnerable to market crises,