natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vztraja, da so nujno potrebni primerljivi in zanesljivi statistični podatki o mobilnosti študentov ter njihovem socialno-ekonomskem profilu, kot so skupni kazalci, merila in referenčni standardi, da bi odpravili trenutno pomanjkanje podatkov in spodbujali izmenjavo dobrih praks;
Insists on the urgent need for comparable and reliable statistics on student mobility and the socio-economic profile of students, such as common indicators, criteria and benchmarks, in order to overcome the current lack of data and promote the exchange of good practices;
poziva univerze, naj izboljšajo in poenostavijo posredovane spletne in nespletne informacije za prihajajoče, pa tudi odhajajoče študente; poziva univerze in nacionalne agencije za Erasmus, naj sodelujejo s študentskimi organizacijami, da bi bile vse potrebne informacije pravočasno na voljo; poziva univerze morajo, naj podpirajo pravice študentov v skladu z obveznostmi, katerim so se zavezale z univerzitetno listino Erasmus;
Calls on universities to improve and simplify the information provided online and off-line, both for incoming and outgoing students; calls on universities and Erasmus National Agencies to collaborate with student organisations in order to make available all the necessary information in due time; calls on universities to support student rights, in line with the commitments they have made, by adhering to the Erasmus University Charter;
poudarja, da je za izpolnitev ciljev v okviru bolonjskega procesa potreben vzajemen pretok študentov in štipendistov; opozarja na razlike v trenutnih trendih in zlasti na slabo mobilnost proti državam članicam, ki so pristopile k EU leta 2004 in 2007;
Emphasises that in order for the Bologna Process to fulfil its objectives, reciprocity in terms of the flow of students and scholars is necessary; underlines the disparities in current trends, and in particular the poor mobility towards the Member States which acceded to the EU in 2004 and 2007;
poudarja pomen mentorstva pri družbenem, kulturnem in jezikovnem vključevanju prihajajočih študentov;
Points out the importance of mentoring for the social, cultural and linguistic integration of incoming students;
poudarja, da je boljše obvladovanje jezikov precejšnja prednost in eden od razlogov za mobilnost študentov ter da je treba prihajajočim študentom pred in/ali v času študija v okviru programa Erasmus nuditi intenzivne jezikovne tečaje;
Stresses that an improved command of languages is a considerable asset and one of the reasons for student mobility, and that it is important for intensive language courses to be offered to incoming students, before and/or during Erasmus study periods;
Reforma visokega šolstva in posodobitev univerz: kakovost, inovativnost in prilagodljivost
Higher education reform and modernisation of universities: quality, innovation and flexibility
poziva univerze v Uniji, naj izvedejo inovativne, daljnosežne in metodološke reforme študijskih programov, ker so ambiciozne in visokokakovostne vsebine in prenovljena organizacija odločilne za mobilnost študentov in večjo prilagodljivost; uvesti je treba "študijsko obdobje v tujini" za programe na vseh stopnjah, da bi lahko študenti študirali v tujini;
Calls on universities in the Union to undertake an innovative, far-reaching and methodical curricular reform, since ambitious and high-quality content and restructuring of organisation is crucial for student mobility and for greater flexibility; calls for a "mobility study period" to be introduced into all degree programmes to enable students to go abroad;
poziva, naj se bolj poudari potreba po skupnih evropskih doktorskih študijskih programih, ki spodbujajo mobilnost študentov doktorskega študija in ustvarjanje okvira za evropski doktorat;
Calls for emphasis to be given to the need for joint European doctoral programmes promoting doctoral student mobility and for the creation of a framework for a European doctorate;
poudarja bistven pomen kakovosti in odličnosti poučevanja, saj sta razvoj in stalno usposabljanje kvalificiranih učiteljev na vseh študijskih področjih odločilnega pomena za privlačnost in učinkovitost študija ter uresničevanje ciljev bolonjskega procesa;
Stresses the essential role of the quality and excellence of teaching, given that the development and ongoing training of qualified teachers in all sectors of studies is crucial for their attractiveness and effectiveness and for achieving the Bologna Process objectives;
poudarja potrebo po boljšem nadnacionalnem dialogu ter izmenjavi informacij in izkušenj za lažje zbliževanje izobraževanja učiteljev, tudi osnovnošolskih, in učinkovitost stalnega poklicnega razvoja;
Reiterates the need for more trans-national dialogue and exchange of information and experiences to facilitate a convergence of teacher education, including primary teacher education, and the effectiveness of continuing professional development;
Financiranje in vlaganje v mobilnost študentov ter socialna razsežnost
Funding and investment in student mobility and the social dimension
poziva, naj se študentom iz prikrajšanih skupin v družbi nameni posebna pomoč, na primer s ponudbo cenovno ugodne in dostojne namestitve, glede na to, da je pogosto potrebna dodatna pomoč po prihodu;
Special assistance should be provided to students from disadvantaged groups in society by, for example, proposing inexpensive and decent accommodation, considering that extra support after arrival is often necessary;
predlaga uvedbo enotne evropske študentske izkaznice, da se študentom olajša mobilnost in zagotovi popust pri stroških nastanitve in bivanja;
Proposes the introduction of a harmonised European Student Identity Card, in order to facilitate mobility and to enable students to get discounts for accommodation and living costs;
poziva države članice in pristojne organe, naj zagotovijo enak dostop do mobilnosti za vse na podlagi enostavnih, prožnih in preglednih postopkov dodeljevanja štipendij ter z zagotovitvijo dodatne finančne pomoči za ciljne države z višjimi življenjskimi stroški in za študente, ki jo potrebujejo; meni, da morajo študenti prejeti to pomoč pred odhodom, da se jim ne naloži preveliko finančno breme;
Calls on the Member States and the competent authorities to guarantee an equal and universal access to mobility by simple, flexible and transparent grant-awarding procedures and by additional financial support for high-cost destinations and for those students who need it; considers it essential for students to receive this support before their departure, to avoid placing an excessive financial burden on them;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bi se lahko v okviru vmesnega pregleda večletnega finančnega okvira, ki ga določa deklaracija, priložena Medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu z dne 17. maja 2006 o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, obravnavalo povečanje finančnega okvira za programe na področju izobraževanja in zlasti za štipendije Erasmus;
Welcomes the fact that, in the context of the mid-term review of the Multi-annual Financial Framework provided for in the Declaration attached to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, increasing the financial envelope allocated to the programmes in the field of education and notably for Erasmus grants could be considered, subject to the results of monitoring and evaluation of the programme;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba uvesti in spodbujati nove načine financiranja mobilnosti študentov, na primer brezobrestna in prenosljiva posojila;
Points out that new means of financing student mobility, such as interest-free loans and transferable loans, should be introduced and promoted;
poziva evropske univerze, naj sodelujejo z zasebnim sektorjem (na primer z gospodarskimi ali poslovnimi organizacijami, kot so gospodarske zbornice), da bi pridobile nove učinkovite mehanizme sofinanciranja mobilnosti študentov na vseh stopnjah študija (dodiplomski, magistrski in doktorski študij), ki bi izboljšali kakovost izobraževalnih sistemov;
Invites European universities to cooperate with the private sector (e.g. economic or business organisations such as chambers of commerce) in order to find new effective mechanisms of co-financing student mobility during each cycle (bachelor-masters-doctorate), thereby improving the quality of educational systems;
priporoča vzpostavitev plodnega dialoga in dvosmernih izmenjav med podjetji in univerzami, na podlagi katerih bi sklenili inovativna partnerstva in preučili nove možnosti sodelovanja;
Suggests a fruitful dialogue and a two-way exchange between companies and universities in order to come up with innovative partnerships and to explore new ways of cooperation;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj začnejo izvajati evropske referenčne okvire (okvir bolonjski okvir kvalifikacij, evropski okvir kvalifikacij za vseživljenjsko učenje, evropske standarde in smernice za zagotavljanje kakovosti in Lizbonsko konvencijo o priznavanju akademskih kvalifikacij), da bi vzpostavile evropski visokošolski prostor;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to proceed with the implementation of the European reference frameworks (Bologna Qualifications Framework, European Qualifications Framework for lifelong learning, European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance, and the Lisbon Recognition Convention) in order to establish the European High Education Area;
zato poudarja nujnost izvajanja celovitega, enotnega in učinkovitega evropskega sistema prenašanja kreditnih točk, da bi se kvalifikacije študentov in akademikov v Evropi lahko enostavno prenesle na podlagi enotnega skupnega okvira;
Stresses the urgency, therefore, of implementing the comprehensive, unified and effective credit transfer system ECTS, in order that students' and academics' qualifications may be easily transferable throughout Europe thanks to a single common framework;
poudarja, da bi lahko sistem treh študijskih ciklov (dodiplomski, magistrski in doktorski) postal bolj prilagodljiv, zlasti prek uporabe sistema "4+1" namesto "3+2" za prvi in drugi cikel; ugotavlja, da bi za nekatere študijske programe lahko bil ta sistem ustreznejši, saj bi zagotovil večjo mobilnost in zaposljivost diplomantov;
Emphasises that the three-cycle degree system (Bachelor degree, Masters Degree and Doctorate) could become more flexible especially by using a "4+1" instead of "3+2" system for the first and second cycles; notes that for some studies this could be more appropriate in order to enable greater mobility and employability of graduates;
poziva, naj se za opravljanje pripravništev ter priložnostne in neformalne izkušnje mobilnosti, ki jih potrdijo univerze, dodelijo kreditne točke evropskega sistema prenašanja kreditnih točk in se priznajo kot sestavni del študijskega programa;
Calls for internships and other informal and non-formal mobility experience approved by universities to be granted ECTS credits and recognised as an integral part of study curricula;
poziva pristojne organe držav članic in evropske univerze, naj spodbujajo ter pospešujejo izmenjave najboljših praks in pobude za ozaveščanje javnosti;
Calls on the Member States' competent authorities and European universities to encourage and foster the exchange of best practices and awareness-raising initiatives;
odločno poziva države članice, naj poenostavijo vizumske postopke in zmanjšajo stroške postopka za mobilne študente, zlasti tiste iz bolj vzhodnih držav članic in kandidatk, v skladu z direktivami EU o vizumih;
Urges Member States to facilitate visa procedures and to reduce the procedural costs for mobile students, especially those from more easterly Member States and candidate countries, in line with the EU Directives on visas;
, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom Sveta 2006/512/ES UL L 200, 22.7.2006, str.
, as amended by Council Decision 2006/512/EC OJ L 200, 22.7.2006, p.
(v nadaljnjem besedilu skupaj "sklep o komitologiji"),
(hereinafter together referred to as "the Comitology Decision"),
ob upoštevanju Izjave Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije o Sklepu Sveta z dne 17. julija 2006 o spremembi Sklepa 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil (2006/512/ES) UL C 255, 21.10.2006, str.
having regard to the Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission concerning the Council Decision of 17 July 2006 amending Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission (2006/512/EC) OJ C 255, 21.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo o postopkih za izvedbo Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES UL C 143, 10.6.2008, str.
having regard to the Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission on procedures for implementing Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC OJ C 143, 10.6.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 192(2) in člena 202 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 192, second paragraph, and Article 202 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 290 in 291 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 290 and 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 8. maja 2008 o sklenitvi Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo o postopkih za izvedbo Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0189 .
having regard to its decision of 8 May 2008 on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission on procedures for implementing Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0189 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0345/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0345/2008 ),
ker je zaradi kakovosti zakonodaje vse bolj potrebno, da se na Komisijo prenese oblikovanje nebistvenih in bolj tehničnih vidikov zakonodaje, pa tudi njeno sprotno prilagajanje, da se upošteva tehnični napredek in gospodarske spremembe; ker je treba olajšati tak prenos pooblastil s tem, da se da zakonodajalcu na voljo institucionalna sredstva za nadzor nad izvrševanjem takšnih pooblastil,
whereas, for the sake of the quality of legislation, it is increasingly necessary to delegate to the Commission the development of the non-essential and more technical aspects of the legislation as well as its prompt adjustment to take account of technological progress and economic change; whereas such delegation of powers must be facilitated by giving the legislator the institutional means to scrutinise the exercise of such powers,
ker zakonodajalec Unije doslej ni imel druge možnosti, kot da je uporabljal člen 202 Pogodbe ES, da je opravil takšen prenos; ker uporaba te določbe ni bila zadovoljiva, saj se nanaša na izvedbena pooblastila Komisije in na postopke pregleda, ki so določeni za ta pooblastila, o postopkih pa odloča Svet soglasno, potem, ko se le posvetuje s Parlamentom; ker ti postopki pregleda temeljijo predvsem na delovanju odborov, sestavljenih iz uradnikov iz držav članic, Parlament pa je bil do sprejetja sklepa Sveta z dne 28. junija 1999, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepom 2006/512/ES, izključen iz vseh teh postopkov,
whereas hitherto the Union legislator had no option other than to use Article 202 of the EC Treaty in order to carry out such delegation; whereas recourse to that provision has not been satisfactory since it refers to the Commission's powers of implementation and to the scrutiny procedures to which such powers are subject, those procedures being decided on by the Council by a unanimous vote after mere consultation of Parliament; whereas those scrutiny procedures are based essentially on the action of committees composed of civil servants of the Member States, and Parliament was excluded from all such procedures until the adoption of the Council Decision of 28 June 1999 as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC,
ker sklep o komitologiji določa, da za tako imenovane kvazi zakonodajne ukrepe velja regulativni postopek s pregledom, skladno s katerim je Parlament v celoti vključen v nadzor teh ukrepov in lahko nasprotuje osnutku ukrepov, ki jih predlaga Komisija in ki presegajo izvedbena pooblastila, določena v temeljnem aktu, ali osnutku, ki ni skladen s ciljem ali z vsebino temeljnega akta ali ne spoštuje načel subsidiarnosti ali sorazmernosti,
whereas the Comitology Decision makes what are known as "quasi-legislative" measures subject to a regulatory procedure with scrutiny under which Parliament is fully associated with the control of such measures and can oppose draft measures proposed by the Commission which exceed the implementing powers provided for in the basic instrument or a draft which is not compatible with the aim or the content of the basic instrument or does not respect the principles of subsidiarity or proportionality,
ker novi postopek s tem, ko postavi oba sozakonodajalca, Parlament in Svet, v enakopraven položaj, zagotavlja demokratičen nadzor nad izvedbenimi ukrepi, ko so ti kvazi zakonodajne narave, ter tako odpravi enega od najbolj resnih vidikov demokratičnega primanjkljaja v Uniji; ker bo sklep o komitologiji omogočil prenos večine tehničnih vidikov zakonodaje in njeno prilagajanje na Komisijo, s čimer bo zagotovljeno, da se bo zakonodajalec osredotočal na bistvene določbe in na izboljševanje kakovosti zakonodaje Skupnosti,
whereas the new procedure guarantees democratic control of implementing measures when they are quasi-legislative in nature by placing both co-legislators, Parliament and the Council, on an equal footing, and thereby brings to an end one of the most serious aspects of the democratic deficit in the Union; whereas the Comitology Decision enables the most technical aspects of legislation and its adjustment to be delegated to the Commission, thereby ensuring that the legislator concentrates on the essential aspects and on improving the quality of Community law,
ker novi regulativni postopek s pregledom ni izbiren, ampak obvezen, kadar imajo izvedbeni ukrepi značilnosti, določene v členu 2(2) sklepa o komitologiji,
whereas the new regulatory procedure with scrutiny is not optional but compulsory when the implementing measures possess the characteristics specified in Article 2(2) of the Comitology Decision,
ker lahko sodijo v okvir zahtev iz člena 2(2) sklepa o komitologiji ne le izvedbeni ukrepi, za katere je doslej veljal regulativni postopek, ampak tudi nekateri ukrepi, za katere veljajo upravljalni ali svetovalni postopki,
whereas not only implementing measures hitherto subject to the regulatory procedure but also some of measures subject to the management or consultation procedures may fall within the ambit of the requirements of Article 2(2) of the Comitology Decision,
ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja hierarhijo predpisov in ustvarja pojem "delegiranega akta", kar pomeni, da se "v zakonodajnem aktu ... na Komisijo prenese pooblastilo za sprejemanje nezakonodajnih aktov, ki se splošno uporabljajo in dopolnjujejo ali spreminjajo nekatere nebistvene elemente zakonodajnega akta"; ker Lizbonska pogodba na nov način obravnava tudi izvedbene akte in zlasti predvideva soodločanje Parlamenta in Sveta kot postopek za sprejetje uredbe, s katero bodo določeni mehanizmi nadzora držav članic nad izvedbenimi akti,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon introduces a hierarchy of norms and creates the concept of a "delegated act", where "a legislative act ... delegate[s] to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application to supplement or amend certain non-essential elements of the legislative act"; whereas the Treaty of Lisbon also treats implementing acts in a new way and provides in particular for codecision between Parliament and the Council as the procedure for the adoption of the regulation that will lay down the mechanisms for control by the Member States over implementing acts,
ker bo za izvajanje ustreznih določb Lizbonske pogodbe potreben intenziven in celovit postopek medinstitucionalnih pogajanj in ker to pomeni, da bi sedanji postopek prilagajanja moral biti dokončan čim prej in v vsakem primeru pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe,
whereas implementation of the corresponding provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon will necessitate an intense and complex process of interinstitutional negotiation, and whereas the present process of alignment should therefore be completed as soon as possible and in any event before the Treaty of Lisbon enters into force,
ker iz istega razloga rezultatov potekajoče prilagoditve posamičnih pravnih instrumentov ni mogoče šteti za precedenčni primer za prihodnost,
whereas, for the same reason, the results of the alignment under way in relation to each individual legal instrument cannot be seen as a precedent for the future,
ker se zdi koristno, da bi se institucije dogovorile o standardni določbi delegiranih aktov, ki bi jo Komisija redno vključevala v osnutek zakonodajnega akta, zakonodajalci pa bi jo še naprej lahko spreminjali; ker je treba v okviru postopka soodločanja nadaljevati s sprejetjem uredbe o mehanizmih nadzora držav članic nad izvedbenimi akti v skladu s členom 291 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
whereas it appears useful to agree between the institutions on a standard passage for delegated acts that would be regularly included by the Commission in the draft legislative act, although the legislators would remain free to amend it; whereas it is necessary to proceed to the adoption in codecision of the regulation laying down the mechanisms for control by Member States of implementing acts in accordance with Article 291 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
zahteva, da Komisija na osnovi ustreznih členov Pogodbe ES predloži Parlamentu zakonodajne predloge za uspešno dokončanje prilagajanja komitologije; poziva, da se ti predlogi pripravijo ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnih razprav in da se obravnavajo zlasti zakonodajni akti, našteti v prilogi;
Requests the Commission to submit to Parliament, on the basis of the appropriate articles of the EC Treaty, legislative proposals completing the comitology alignment; calls for these proposals to be drawn up in the light of interinstitutional discussions and to address in particular the legislative acts listed in the Annex hereto;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži ustrezen zakonodajni predlog, da se preostali akti, zlasti tisti, ki so našteti v prilogi, uskladijo s sklepom o komitologiji;
Calls on the Commission to submit the corresponding legislative proposals for the purpose of bringing the remaining legal acts into line with the Comitology Decision, in particular those listed in the Annex hereto;
zahteva, da Komisija v primeru, če sedanji postopki prilagajanja ne bodo zaključeni pred začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, predloži ustrezne zakonodajne predloge za uskladitve pravnih aktov, ki do takrat še ne bodo prilagojeni, novi ureditvi iz člena 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Requests the Commission, in the event that the present alignment procedures are not concluded prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, to submit the relevant legislative proposals needed to adapt those legal acts that have still not been aligned at that juncture to the new regime provided for by Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;