natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja UL C 37, 3.2.2001, str.
having regard to the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection OJ C 37, 3.2.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju smernic Skupnosti o državni pomoči in naložbah tveganega kapitala v mala in srednje velika podjetja UL C 194, 18.8.2006, str.
having regard to the Community guidelines to promote State aid and risk capital investments in small and medium-sized enterprises OJ C 194, 18.8.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju smernic o državni regionalni pomoči za 2007–2013 UL C 54, 4.3.2006, str.
having regard to the Guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 OJ C 54, 4.3.2006, p.
, v različici, kot je bila za pripravo mnenja posredovana Parlamentu dne 8. septembra 2004,
, in the version forwarded to Parliament for its opinion on 8 September 2004,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 22. februarja 2005 o državni pomoči v obliki nadomestil javnih storitev UL C 304 E, 1.12.2005, str.
having regard to its resolution of 22 February 2005 on State aid in the form of public service compensation OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0176/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0176/2007 ),
pozdravlja ukrepe Komisije za posodobitev politike konkurence, zlasti pa njeno okrepljeno stališče glede boja proti kartelom, ponovno osredotočenost na nedovoljene državne pomoči in preiskave v sektorjih; čestita Komisiji za vse, kar je storila za izboljšanje delovanja Evropske mreže za konkurenco (ECN); čestita Komisiji za njene dosežke na področju večstranskega in dvostranskega sodelovanja ter poziva k nadaljnjemu napredku njenih dejavnosti, usmerjenih k mednarodni konvergenci politike konkurence;
Welcomes the Commission's action to modernise competition policy and, in particular, its reinforced stance on combating cartels, its renewed targeting of unauthorised State aid and its sector inquiries; congratulates the Commission on the steps it has taken in improving the functioning of the European Competition Network (ECN); congratulates the Commission on its achievements in the area of multilateral and bilateral cooperation and calls for further progress in its activities towards the international convergence of competition policy;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija pri izvrševanju politike konkurence daje prednost ekonomskemu pristopu in ne pristopu, ki temelji na pravilih; pozdravlja pristop Komisije v njenih preiskavah v sektorjih, ki je bližje dejanskemu stanju poslovne prakse, zlasti v sektorju finančnih storitev in energetskem sektorju; nadalje poudarja, da bi morale te preiskave razkrivati trenutne razmere in trende v ciljnih sektorjih ter spodbujati politiko, ki bo usmerjena v prihodnost;
Welcomes the preference attributed by the Commission to an economic rather than rules-based approach to competition policy enforcement; welcomes the Commission's approach in its sector inquiries, which is closer to the realities of business practices, particularly as regards the financial services and energy sectors; further stresses that those inquiries should shed light on the current sector situation and trends in the targeted sectors and should stimulate a forward-focused policy;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za izboljšanje kakovosti izvrševanja odločitev v okviru Evropske mreže za konkurenco prek okrepljenega sodelovanja z in med nacionalnimi organi za konkurenco;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts to improve the quality of enforcement of decisions in the context of the ECN through increased cooperation with and among national competition authorities (NCAs);
ponovno poziva, kar zadeva sodelovanje z nacionalnimi organi za konkurenco in izvrševanje teh organov, k nadaljnjemu zmanjševanju negotovosti, ki jo povzročajo različne razlage konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti s strani nacionalnih sodišč, ter razlik v hitrosti, vsebini in izvrševanju končnih odločitev; poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o ustanovitvi mreže pravosodnih organov, ki bo primerljiva z Evropsko mrežo za konkurenco;
Renews the call, as regards cooperation with and enforcement by NCAs, for further progress in the reduction of uncertainty caused by diverging interpretations of Community competition law by national courts, as well as discrepancies in the speed, content and enforcement of final decisions; calls on the Commission to consider the creation of a network of judicial authorities, comparable to the ECN;
ponovno poziva, kar zadeva storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena, ob upoštevanju precejšnjih razlik med politikami, ki prevladujejo v državah članicah, k nadaljnjemu napredku v zvezi s pojasnjevanjem obstoječih pravil konkurence in njihove praktične uporabe;
Renews the call in relation to services of general economic interest (SGEIs) given the considerable differences in policies prevailing across the Member States, for further progress in relation to both the clarification of the existing competition rules and their practical application;
v zvezi s tem opozarja, da je potrebna uskladitev dvojnih instrumentov odškodninskih tožb in postopkov programa prizanesljivosti, da se za pravilno ravnanje zagotovijo ustrezne spodbude;
Recalls, in this light, the need to coordinate the dual instruments of damages actions and leniency procedures, in order to ensure that adequate incentives for proper behaviour are in place;
je zaskrbljen nad preveliko zamudo pri postopkih izterjave nedovoljenih državnih pomoči, dodeljenih s strani številnih držav članic; poudarja, da lahko nezadostno izvajanje pravil na tem področju resno ogrozi pošteno konkurenco;
Expresses concern about the excessive delay in the processes of recovery of unauthorised State aid granted by several Member States; stresses that the inadequate enforcement of rules in this area may seriously harm fair competition;
pozdravlja sprejetje pravil Skupnosti o konkurenci s strani držav članic, ki so se zadnje pridružile Evropski uniji, in priporoča dodatno izboljšanje kakovosti izvajanja teh pravil;
Welcomes the adoption of Community competition rules by the most recently acceded Member States and recommends the continued refinement of the quality of the implementation of those rules;
priznava ključno vlogo, ki jo ima lahko ustrezna politika konkurence pri doseganju ciljev Lizbonske strategije; opozarja, da se vloga politike konkurence lahko okrepi tako, da se ustrezno poveže s kohezijsko politiko;
Notes the key role that adequate competition policy can play towards achieving the Lisbon Strategy goals; recalls that the role of competition policy can be enhanced if it is adequately coupled with a cohesion policy;
poziva Komisijo, da natančno preuči, kako na davčno konkurenco med državami članicami vplivajo nekatere prakse obdavčevanja, zlasti v zvezi z družbami;
Calls on the Commission to consider carefully how tax competition among the Member States is affected by certain taxation practices, especially in relation to companies;
meni, da bi lahko določene prakse obdavčevanja, ki jih uporabljajo nekateri švicarski kantoni, vplivale na izkrivljanje konkurence ter poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj s Švicarsko konfederacijo nadaljujejo dialog o teh vprašanjih za sodelovanje Švice pri kodeksu obnašanja na področju obdavčevanja podjetij, ki je priložen sklepom Sveta sestanka Ekonomsko-finančnega sveta dne 1. decembra 1997 o davčni politiki UL C 2, 6.1.1998, str.
Takes the view that certain the taxation practices applied by some of the Swiss cantons could have the effect of distorting competition, and calls on the Member States and the Commission to continue their dialogue with the Swiss Confederation on these issues with a view to Swiss participation in the Code of Conduct for Business Taxation annexed to the Council conclusions of the ECOFIN Council Meeting on 1 December 1997 concerning the taxation policy OJ C 2, 6.1.1998, p.
podpira prizadevanja Komisije za uvedbo skupne konsolidirane davčne osnove za pravne osebe, veljavne v Skupnosti, ker bo omogočila lažjo primerjavo, in opozarja na vidike iz svoje resolucije z dne 13. decembra 2005 o obdavčevanju podjetij v Evropski uniji: skupna konsolidirana davčna osnova za pravne osebe UL C 286 E, 23.11.2006, str.
Supports the Commission's efforts to introduce a Community-wide common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB), since this will make for easier comparison, and draws attention to the views endorsed in its resolution of 13 December 2005 on taxation of undertakings in the European Union: a common consolidated corporate tax base OJ C 286 E, 23.11.2006, p.
ponovno trdi, da je za oblikovanje prava o konkurenci potrebna večja vloga Parlamenta, vključno s spodbujanjem njegove pristojnosti soodločanja na tem področju;
Reaffirms the need for an increased role of Parliament, including the promotion of co-decision powers, in the formulation of competition law;
opozarja na potrebo po spodbujanju ustrezne krepitve zmogljivosti na ravni Skupnosti, da se uresničijo ambiciozni cilji Lizbonske strategije ter obvladajo podjetja in nacionalne regulativne agencije, ki bodo mogoče imeli visoko število uslužbencev;
Recalls the need to promote adequate capacity-building at Community level in order to meet the ambitious Lisbon Strategy goals and cope with the possible high levels of staff in businesses and NCAs;
pozdravlja prizadevanja za okrepitev vloge Evropske mreže za konkurenco na področju krepitve konkurence prek usklajevanja postopkov in razlaganja predpisov ter prenos pristojnosti in izmenjavo izkušenj med nacionalnimi organi za konkurenco;
Welcomes the efforts to strengthen the ECN's role in the field of competition enforcement through the harmonisation of practices and interpretation of norms, as well as the delegation of competences and the exchange of experiences among NCAs;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi dosedanjega sorazmernega neuspešnega vzpostavljanja prave konkurence na energetskih trgih; ugotavlja, da se je v številnih državah članicah izkazalo, da razdružitev lastništva ni dovolj za zagotovitev primerne konkurence, saj so zelo visoki tržni deleži sedanjih udeležencev povezani z nezadostnim dostopom do trga in blokado trga;
Expresses its concern at the relative failure to date to achieve genuine competition in the energy markets; notes that in many Member States ownership unbundling has proven insufficient to ensure adequate competition, as very high market shares of incumbent operators are associated with insufficient market access and market foreclosure;
je trdno prepričan, da je treba za prednostno nalogo določiti uvedbo enakih konkurenčnih pogojev, ki omogočajo nov vstop na trg in spodbujajo uvedbo novih okolju prijaznih tehnologij; v zvezi s tem čestita Komisiji, da je v celoti uporabila svoje pristojnosti na področju konkurence, predpisov o združevanju in državni pomoči, da bi okrepila učinkovitost energetskega trga; pozdravlja dejstvo, da je preiskava v energetskem sektorju, vzporedno z izvajanjem v posameznih primerih, imela pomembno vlogo pri delu Komisije v zvezi z opredeljevanjem nujnih regulativnih sprememb, zlasti pri vprašanjih, kot so: doseganje ustreznega ločevanja dejavnosti povezovanja v mrežo in dejavnosti oskrbe, odpravljanje regulativnih vrzeli, zlasti pri čezmejnih vprašanjih, obravnavanje koncentracije na trgu in ovir za vstop ter povečanje preglednosti pri dejavnostih na trgu;
Strongly believes that the introduction of a level playing field that enables new market entry and facilitates the introduction of new environmentally friendly technologies must be a priority; congratulates the Commission, in this respect, for making full use of its powers under the competition, merger and State aid rules, in order to enhance the efficiency of the energy market; welcomes the fact that in parallel to the enforcement of individual cases, the energy sector inquiry has played an important role in the Commission's work on identifying necessary regulatory changes in particular issues such as achieving adequate unbundling of network and supply activities, removing regulatory gaps in particular regarding cross-border issues, addressing market concentration and barriers to entry, and increasing transparency in market operations;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba večjo prednost nameniti, poleg odprave vertikalnih konglomeratov in zagotovitve pogojev za učinkovit dostop do trga, tudi dokončni razdružitvi lastništva v energetskem sektorju;
Underlines that the completion of ownership unbundling in the energy sector, alongside the dismantling of vertical conglomerates and guaranteeing conditions for effective market access should be given stronger priority;
pozdravlja splošni cilj preiskave energetskega sektorja, da se obravnavajo ovire, ki preprečujejo razvoj energetskega trga Skupnosti, do 1. julija 2007; soglaša s stališči Komisije, da je treba okrepiti pooblastila nacionalnih organov za konkurenco in izboljšati usklajevanje na ravni Skupnosti, zlasti v zvezi s čezmejnimi vprašanji; poziva Komisijo k izvajanju izvršilnih ukrepov, vključno z denarnimi kaznimi za podjetja, ki kršijo pravila konkurence; spodbuja Komisijo, da sproži postopek proti državam članicam, ki neupravičeno ščitijo nacionalna energetska podjetja;
Welcomes the overall objective of the energy inquiry which is to address the barriers currently impeding the development of an Community-wide energy market by 1 July 2007; shares the views of the Commission that the powers of NCAs need to be strengthened and that coordination must be enhanced at Community level, particularly as regards to cross-border issues; calls on the Commission to pursue enforcement action including fines against companies which breach competition rules; encourages the Commission to proceed against Member States which unduly protect national energy companies;
poziva Komisijo, da preuči ustrezen konkurenčni položaj bonitetnih agencij, revizijskih družb in velikih investicijskih bank;
Calls on the Commission to examine the respective competition situations of rating agencies, auditing firms, and large investment banks;
poudarja, da mora pravo konkurence veljati za vse udeležence na evropskem trgu, ne glede na to, ali imajo svoj sedež v Evropski uniji; meni, da je pomembno, da Komisija enako odločno in dosledno ukrepa tako proti podjetjem iz tretjih držav kakor proti podjetjem iz EU;
Stresses that competition law must be applied to all players on the European market, whether or not they have their headquarters in the European Union; considers it to be important for the Commission to act with equal firmness and consistency in regard to both third-country and EU undertakings;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za izvedbo študije, s katero bo ugotovila, ali se cene energije zvišujejo predvsem zaradi zvišanja cen goriva in vpliva sistema trgovanja z emisijami EU ali pa je vzrok za povišanje nekonkurenčno ravnanje udeležencev na trgu;
Welcomes the initiative taken by the Commission to commission a study to identify whether the rise in prices for energy is mainly due to the rise of fuel prices and the impact of the Emission Trading Scheme, or to the anti-competitive behaviour of market players;
opozarja na zavezo Komisije, da bo ponovnega pregledala "pravilo dveh tretjin", ki se uporablja kot prag za ocenjevanje učinka, ki ga imajo za Skupnost predlogi za združitev; predlaga, da bi bila napredek na tem področju in doslednejši pristop pri ocenjevanju primerljivih združitev dobrodošla, in sicer vsakokrat, ko bi odločitve, sprejete na nacionalni ravni, lahko močno vplivale na strukturo trgov v sosednjih državah članicah;
Recalls the Commission's commitment to review the "two-thirds rule" as a threshold for finding a Community impact in regard to merger proposals; suggests that progress in this area and a more consistent approach in the evaluation of comparable merger operations would be welcome whenever decisions taken at national level could have a strong impact on the market structure of neighbouring Member States;
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da bi podprla medsebojno povezljivost infrastrukturnih omrežij; poziva, da se posebna pozornost nameni posebnim značilnostim obrobnih trgov;
Welcomes the Commission's aim to support the inter-connectivity of infrastructure networks; calls for special attention to be paid to the specific features of peripheral markets;
pozdravlja Zeleno knjigo Komisije o odškodninah in poudarja, da morajo vse žrtve, ki so utrpele škodo zaradi protikonkurenčnega obnašanja, imeti pravico do prejema nadomestila;
Welcomes the Commission's Damages Green Paper and underlines that the right of victims who have suffered losses as a result of anti-competitive behaviour to obtain compensation must be effective;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za okrepitev instrumentov za boj proti kartelom, zlasti revizijo postopkov prizanesljivosti in smernice o načinu določanja kazni, ki so osredotočene na dolgoročne dogovore na velikih trgih;
Applauds the Commission's efforts to strengthen the instruments for tackling cartels, in particular, the revision of its leniency procedures and its new guidelines on the method of setting fines, which focus on long-standing agreements in large markets;
meni, da bi bilo za uporabo pravil Skupnosti in nacionalnih pravil za nadzor združitev zelo koristno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi za konkurenco, usmerjeno k vzpostavitvi skupne podatkovne baze, v kateri bi bili zbrani vsi posamezni raziskani primeri, v okviru posebne mreže za izmenjavo informacij;
Believes that the application of the Community and national merger control rules would benefit highly from cooperation among NCAs towards the implementation of a common database registering all the individual cases examined, in the context of a specific network for information exchange;
pozdravlja študijo o protiukrepih v zvezi z združitvami, ki obravnava vpliv predlaganih protiukrepov v obdobju med letoma 1996 in 2000; meni, da takšne naknadne preiskave zagotavljajo pomemben vpogled v politiko in jih je treba zato razširiti na druga področja izvajanja politike konkurence;
Welcomes the Merger Remedies Study, which examines the impact of proposed remedy measures during the period 1996 to 2000; considers that such ex-post examinations provide crucial policy insights, and, consequently, should be extended to other areas of competition policy enforcement;
ugotavlja, na podlagi študije o protiukrepih v zvezi z združitvami 2005, da je učinkovitost strukturnih protiukrepov pogosto oslabljena zaradi nekonkurenčnega obnašanja podjetij in javnih organov, zlasti omejevanja dostopa do trga; zato poziva Komisijo, naj poveča nadzor te potencialne vrzeli na področju izvajanja protiukrepov v zvezi z združitvami;
Notes that according to the Merger Remedies Study, the effectiveness of structural remedies is often undermined by the uncompetitive behaviour of the firms and public authorities, in particular, by the limitation of market access; consequently calls on the Commission to increase its vigilance as regards that possible loophole in merger remedy enforcement;
ugotavlja, da je politika državnih pomoči sestavni del politike konkurence in da nadzor državnih pomoči izraža potrebo po ohranitvi enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vsa podjetja, ki delujejo na notranjem trgu; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da bi povečala preglednost in javno odgovornost obstoječih mehanizmov državnih pomoči; pozdravlja nadaljnja prizadevanja za izboljšanje preglednosti na tem področju; poleg tega poudarja potrebo po jasnih merilih za merjenje obsega državnih pomoči;
Notes that State aid policy is an integral part of competition policy and that State aid control reflects the need to maintain a level playing field for all undertakings carrying out activities in the internal market; welcomes, in this respect, the Commission's efforts to increase the transparency and public accountability of the existing mechanisms of State aid; welcomes further efforts to improve transparency in this context; stresses, furthermore, the need for clear criteria for measuring State aid levels;
ponovno poziva k nadaljnjemu spremljanju in odprtemu poročanju o razvoju državnih pomoči, s primerjavami med državami članicami, da se doseže želeni cilj zmanjšanja takšnih pomoči;
Reiterates its earlier call for follow-up and open reporting on the development of State aid, with comparisons between the Member States, with a view to achieving the desired objective of reducing such aid;
ponovno opozarja, da je treba preprečiti konkurenco in podvajanje med sistemi državnih pomoči držav članic ter kakršnakoli izkrivljanja, ki bi jih lahko na notranji trg uvedli različni nacionalni tehnični in finančni instrumenti v podporo državnim pomočem; meni, da so nadaljnja prizadevanja Komisije za uskladitev nacionalnih postopkov in spodbujanje izmenjave informacij in dobrih praks izrednega pomena;
Recalls the need to avoid competition and duplication among Member States" State aid schemes, as well as any distortions that different national technical and financial capacities to support State aid may introduce in the internal market; suggests that further efforts by the Commission to harmonise national practices and promote the exchange of information and best practices are of the utmost relevance;
opozarja na načelo združljivosti med državnimi pomočmi in kohezijsko politiko Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, da glede na cilje Skupnosti in njene kohezijske politike zagotovi, da državne pomoči ne povzročijo izkrivljanja konkurence v smislu spodbujanja selitve podjetij iz ene države članice v drugo, kar lahko povzroči tekmovanje podjetij za subvencije brez dodajanja vrednosti splošnim ciljem Skupnosti in zlasti izgubo delovnih mest v eni regiji v korist druge; opozarja, da regionalna pomoč, odobrena zunaj odobrenih programov regionalne pomoči, vključuje sama po sebi večjo nevarnost za izkrivljanje konkurence;
Recalls the principle of compatibility between State aid and Community cohesion policy; calls on the Commission, in view of the Community's objectives and cohesion policies, to ensure that State aid does not result in distorted competition by provoking the relocation of companies from one Member State to another, which may lead to subsidy-shopping by businesses without any added value for the common goals of the Community and, in particular, to the loss of jobs in one region for the benefit of another; recalls that regional aid approved outside authorised regional aid schemes intrinsically involves higher risks of distortion to competition;
pozdravlja povečano občutljivost Komisije v zvezi z vprašanji Lizbonske strategije v okviru upravljanja državnih pomoči in zaskrbljenost v zvezi s približevanjem manj razvitih regij v Evropski uniji na tem področju;
Welcomes the increased sensitivity of the Commission in relation to Lisbon Strategy issues in the context of State aid management and its concerns regarding the 'catching-up' of less developed regions in the European Union in this area;
meni, da se mora politika Skupnosti glede državnih pomoči, zlasti v sektorjih, ki delujejo na globaliziranem trgu, osredotočiti na prakse vlad tretjih držav glede pomoči v razmerju do konkurentov; vendar predlaga, da se ravnotežje doseže s podporo prizadevanjem v zvezi s sodelovanjem in vzajemnim priznavanjem in ne s konkurenco subvencij;
Considers that Community State aid policy, particularly regarding sectors that operate in the globalised market, must focus on aid practices by third-country governments in relation to competitors; suggests, however, that a balance should be achieved by giving preference to efforts regarding cooperation and mutual recognition, rather than through subsidy competition;
opozarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da so cilji Skupnosti v zvezi z nadzorom nad podnebjem, skupaj z državnimi pomočmi za varstvo okolja v različnih državah in sektorjih, združljivi s cilji politike konkurence; poziva Komisijo, da to vprašanje obravnava pri prihodnjem pregledu skupinskih izjem glede okoljskih državnih pomoči;
Recalls the need to guarantee that compliance with Community targets on climate control, combined with environmental State aid, across different countries and sectors, are compatible with competition objectives; calls on the Commission to address this issue in the forthcoming review of the environmental aid block exemption;