natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da se lahko končna odločitev o globalni ravni proračuna Parlamenta za leto 2006 sprejme le, ko so potrebe jasno določene; poudarja dejstvo, da bodo te potrebe določale raven proračuna; poudarja, da si je za nove pobude treba prizadevati le po previdnem premisleku dolgoročnih finančnih posledic;
Considers that the final decision on the global level of Parliament's budget for 2006 can only be taken once needs have been clearly identified; calls on the Bureau to present a report on more effective budgeting before the estimates are presented, in order to eradicate the possibility of large amounts of 'ramassage'; underlines the fact that those needs will determine the level of the budget; points out that new initiatives should be undertaken only after careful consideration of the long-term financial implications;
od Sveta zahteva, da ob uvedbi novih pobud najde sredstva, najprej s prerazporeditvijo; prosi Svet, naj uporabi enako strogost pri vzpostavljanju svojega proračuna, kot to velja za proračune drugih institucij;
Calls on the Council, should it introduce new initiatives, to find resources firstly through reallocation; requests the Council to apply the same rigour in establishing its own budget as it applies to the budgets of other institutions;
vabi Svet, da zagotovi nadzornim organom za Schengen in carine zadostna sredstva, ki bi jim omogočila izvajanje potrebnih pregledov;
Invites the Council to provide sufficient resources to the Schengen and Customs Supervisory Authorities to allow them to conduct the necessary inspections;
poziva Svet, da hkrati z drugimi organi predstavi svoje ocene in jih objavi kot del predhodnega predloga proračuna;
Calls on the Council to present its estimates at the same time as the other institutions and to have them published as part of the preliminary draft budget;
opozarja, da je Sodišče predčasno plačalo za svoje stavbe, kar je znižalo stroške proračuna za leto 2005; opozarja, da so letna izplačila za prizidke predvidena v letu 2006;
Recalls that the Court of Justice has made early payments for its buildings, which reduced the budgetary cost for 2005; notes that the annual payments for the "Annex" buildings are scheduled to be resumed in 2006;
poziva Sodišče, da predloži Evropskemu parlamentu poročilo o pripravah za ustanovitev Sodišča za uslužbence Evropske unije in njegovih finančnih posledicah;
Calls on the Court of Justice to submit a report to the European Parliament on the preparations for setting up the Civil Service Tribunal and its financial implications;
poziva Sodišče k bolj učinkoviti porabi svojih sredstev, da bi pospešilo pravne postopke (povečana sredstva za manjše senate; prerazporeditev osebja);
Requests the Court of Justice to make more efficient use of its resources in order to speed up legal procedures (increased recourse to smaller chambers; reallocation of staff);
poudarja, da osmim članom Računskega sodišča v letu 2006 poteče mandat, kar pomeni dodatne stroške za proračun kot posledico zaradi nadomestil v enkratnem znesku in izplačil pokojnin;
Points out that the term of office of eight Members of the Court of Auditors will come to an end in 2006, which will result in additional expenditure for its budget as a consequence of one-off allowances and pension payments;
opozarja, da bo Računsko sodišče nadaljevalo s projekti posodabljanja glavne stavbe v skladu z zdravstvenimi, varnostnimi in okoljskimi predpisi ter z gradnjo drugega prizidka;
Notes that the Court of Auditors will continue projects to modernise its main building to conform with health, safety and environmental regulations and to construct a second extension;
poudarja pomembnost strogosti proračuna, zlasti v zvezi z lastninskimi projekti; oba odbora poziva, da Evropskemu parlamentu predložita poročilo o svojih projektih gradnje in potrebah po najetih pisarniških prostorih ter o delovanju skupnih služb; in prosi ta dva organa, da zagotovita poročila o stanju v zvezi z delovnimi mesti finančnega nadzora;
Stresses the importance of budgetary rigour, especially in relation to property projects; invites the two committees to submit a report to the European Parliament on their building projects and needs for rented office space and on the functioning of the joint services; asks the two institutions to provide reports on the situation as regards the occupation of posts in financial control;
opozarja na povečanje dejavnosti Urada Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic; namerava oceniti finančne posledice sprememb števila pritožb;
Notes the increase in activities by the European Ombudsman's office; plans to evaluate the financial implications of the changes in the number of complaints;
Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS)
poudarja, da bo leto 2006 drugo leto polnega izvajanja dejavnosti Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov;
Points out that 2006 will be the second year in which the EDPS has been fully operational;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, Računskemu sodišču, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru, Odboru regij, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor.
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih resolucij o posvetovanjih Odbora za peticije,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 12. aprila 1989 o krepitvi pravice do peticije UL C 120, 16.5.1989, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 12 April 1989 on strengthening the right of petition OJ C 120, 16.5.1989, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 21 in 194 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 21 and 194 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2003,
having regard to the annual report for the year 2003 of the European Ombudsman ,
ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 192(6) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 45 and 192(6) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0040/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0040/2005 ),
ker je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, ki je neizogibno povezana z državljanstvom Evropske unije,
whereas the right to petition is a fundamental right inextricably linked with European Union citizenship,
ker je pravica do peticije v Pogodbi ES prisotna od leta 1992 dalje in je potrjena v osnutku Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo (člen II-104), ki jo je Evropski parlament sprejel 12. januarja 2005 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0004.
whereas the right to petition has been enshrined in the EU Treaty since 1992 and is confirmed in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (Article II-104), adopted by the European Parliament on 12 January 2005 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0004.
ker sta pravica do peticije, predložene Evropskemu parlamentu, in pravica do pritožbe Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic pomembni obliki temeljnih sredstev, ki omogočata evropskim državljanom, da z njima izvršujejo svoje neposredne demokratične pravice,
whereas the right of petition to the European Parliament and the right of complaint to the European Ombudsman are important examples of the essential means made available to European citizens for the exercise by them of their direct democratic rights,
ker kakovost in naraščajoče število prejetih peticij pojasnjujeta, da uporabljajo državljani Evropske unije to pravico za vključevanje v ukvarjanje z interesi Evropske unije, kar zavezuje Evropski parlament, da peticije obravnava učinkovito, pregledno in brez zamud,
whereas the quality and the growing number of petitions received illustrate that citizens resident in the EU are using this right to involve themselves in action on matters of concern for the European Union, a fact which obliges the European Parliament to deal with petitions effectively, transparently and without delay,
ker je Evropski parlament peticije vedno priznaval kot sredstva za povečevanje svoje sposobnosti pri izvrševanju pooblastil pri političnem nadzoru kot odgovor na zaskrbljenost državljanov Evropske unije, zlasti v zvezi z možnimi resnimi kršitvami evropske zakonodaje ali pomanjkanjem spoštovanja njihovih temeljnih in osnovnih pravic,
whereas the European Parliament has always recognised petitions as a means of enhancing its ability to exercise its power of political oversight in response to the concerns of EU citizens, particularly regarding potentially serious infringements of European law or lack of respect for their fundamental and basic rights,
ker evropski državljani zahtevajo ne samo boljše sinergije pri delu evropskih institucij, temveč tudi večjo preglednost in jasnost v zvezi z odgovornostmi evropskih institucij na eni strani, zlasti Parlamenta, Komisije, Sveta, Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in specializiranih agencij, ter organov držav članic na drugi strani, vključujoč odbore za peticije in storitve varuha človekovih pravic v okviru nacionalnih in regionalnih parlamentov, med katerimi so vsi pomembni, ker evropskim državljanom nudijo potrebno pomoč pri izvrševanju njihovih zakonitih pravic,
whereas European citizens require not only better synergy in the work of the institutions but also greater transparency and clarity regarding the responsibilities of the European institutions on the one hand, in particular the Parliament, the Commission, the Council, the European Ombudsman and the specialised agencies and, on the other hand, the Member States' authorities, including petitions committees and ombudsman services within national and regional parliaments, all of which are important as they provide European citizens with the necessary assistance for the exercise of their legitimate rights,
ker si Evropski parlament, ki ima po spremembi člena 230 Pogodbe ES, uvedeni s Pogodbo iz Nice, pravico do vložitve tožbe pri Sodišču pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, to pomeni, ne glede na to, ali to vpliva na njegove posebne pravice ali ne, še naprej prizadeva krepiti pravne in politične instrumente, ki jih ima na voljo, s čimer bi bilo omogočeno bolj učinkovito odgovarjanje na upravičeno zaskrbljenost državljanov,
whereas the European Parliament, which after the amendment to Article 230 of the EC Treaty made by the Treaty of Nice, has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission, that is, irrespective of whether its prerogatives are affected or not, is seeking to further strengthen the legal and political instruments at its disposal, thereby enabling it to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
ker ima Evropski parlament kot neposredno izvoljeno predstavniško telo evropskih državljanov na evropski ravni posebno nalogo in privilegij braniti pravice državljanov; ker Parlament vseeno potrebuje pomoč in zanesljivo sodelovanje Komisije kot varuha pogodb, da bo zmožen rešiti težave, zaradi katerih državljani prosijo za njegovo pomoč,
H whereas the European Parliament, as the directly elected representative body of European citizens at the European level, has a specific duty and privilege to defend citizens' rights; whereas Parliament, nevertheless, needs the help and loyal co-operation of, notably, the Commission as the Guardian of the Treaties if it is to be able to remedy problems which have led citizens to seek its assistance,
ker imajo države članice in sedanje predsedstvo Sveta Evropske unije posebno dolžnost, da evropskim državljanom zagotovijo, da nacionalne, regionalne in lokalne uprave ter agencije, ki delujejo pod njihovim vodstvom, upoštevajo in pravilno izvajajo zakone, ki so jih uvedli zakonodajni organi evropskih institucij,
whereas the Member States and the Presidency-in-Office of the Council of the European Union have a particular duty to guarantee to European citizens that laws which are established through the legislative authority of the European institutions are respected and properly applied by the national, regional and local administrations including the agencies acting under their authority,
ponovno potrjuje, da je Odbor za peticije eden od najpomembnejših teles Evropskega parlamenta za izvrševanje parlamentarnega pregleda institucij EU in nacionalnih, regionalnih ter lokalnih organov, s čimer sta izboljšana preglednost in ozaveščanje o dejavnostih Evropske unije, ki so povezane z evropskimi državljani;
Reaffirms that the Committee on Petitions is one of the most important bodies within the European Parliament for the exercise of parliamentary scrutiny over the EU institutions as well as national, regional, local and social authorities, thereby improving transparency and awareness of the actions of the European Union as they relate to the European citizen;
ugotavlja, da dajejo peticije zelo koristno sliko stopnje, do katere posamezni državljan pojmuje, da so bila njegova pričakovanja v zvezi z Evropsko unijo izpolnjena, od katere se pogosto počuti osebno zelo oddaljen, neudeležen ali neprimerno obravnavan;
Notes that petitions give a very useful picture of the degree to which individual citizens consider that their expectations are being fulfilled with regard to the European Union, in relation to which they often feel personally far removed, uninvolved or inadequately treated;
poudarja, da je Evropski parlament v postopku obravnave peticij zmožen oceniti in, če je potrebno, javno razkriti nenatančnost političnih ciljev, vrzeli v pravnem okvirju, težave s praktičnim izvajanjem politik ali druge slabosti v zvezi z Evropsko unijo, prav tako tudi kršitve držav članic;
Stresses that through the petitions process, the European Parliament is able to assess and, if necessary, publicly reveal a lack of precision in political objectives, loopholes in the legal framework, problems with the practical implementation of policies or other weaknesses as far as the European Union is concerned, as well as possible infringements by the Member States;
poudarja konstruktivno vlogo Komisije pri obravnavi peticij in smatra sodelovanje s Komisijo za nujno; poziva Komisijo, da v svojem letnem poročilu o uporabi prava Skupnosti navede tiste primere, za katere se je začel postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev kot posledica udeležbe Parlamenta po tem, ko so evropski državljani predložili peticije;
Underlines the constructive role played by the Commission in the consideration of petitions and regards cooperation with the Commission as essential; calls on the Commission to indicate in its annual report on the application of Community law those cases where infringement proceedings have been initiated as a result of Parliament's involvement following the submission of petitions by European citizens;
zahteva časovno razporeditev letnih razprav in glasovanja na plenarnem zasedanju o delu ustreznih odborov in o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, da bi sovpadali z razpravo o letnem poročilu Komisije o uporabi prava Skupnosti;
Calls for the timing of the annual debate and vote in plenary on the work of the relevant committee and on the annual report on the activities of the European Ombudsman to coincide with the debate on the Commission's annual report on the application of Community law;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so pobude za pošiljanje delegacij v različne države članice ali regije Unije z namenom proučevanja vprašanj, ki so jih predložili predlagatelji peticij na kraju samem, poslušanja stališč zadevnih skupnosti in zbujanja večje ozaveščenosti pristojnih organov in medijev pomagale, da je osredotočanje na težave postalo bolj učinkovito in da se je izkazalo, da imajo predlagatelji peticij v večini primerov od tega koristi;
Welcomes the fact that the initiatives for the despatch of delegations to various Member States or regions of the Union to investigate issues raised by petitioners on the spot, listen to the views of the communities concerned and arouse greater awareness on the part of the competent authorities and the media, have helped to focus attention on problems more effectively and have proved to be of benefit to petitioners in many cases;
poudarja svoj namen, da bi čim bolj izkoristili uporabo člena 192(1) Poslovnika, ki dovoljuje ustreznemu odboru, da sestavi poročilo ali kako drugače izrazi svoje mnenje o peticijah, ki so bile označene za dopustne;
Stresses its intention to make more effective use of Rule 192(1) of the Rules of Procedure, which allows the relevant committee to draw up a report or otherwise express its opinion on petitions it has declared admissible;
opozarja, da je treba jasno določiti odgovornosti in dolžnosti Komisiji, Svetu in državam članicam ter drugim imenovanim organom, ki uporabljajo zakonodajo EU, kot je določeno v delovnem dokumentu, ki ga je Odbor za peticije predložil predsedniku Konvencije za prihodnost Evrope Delovni dokument, predložen predsedniku Konvencije za prihodnost Evrope.
Recalls the need to allocate clear responsibilities and duties to the Commission, to the Council and to Member States or other designated authorities which apply EU law, as indicated in the working document submitted by the Committee on Petitions to the Chairman of the Convention on the Future of Europe Working document submitted to the President of the Convention on the Future of Europe.
Poročevalec: Proinsias De Rossa (PE 318.508/def.).
Rapporteur: Proinsias De Rossa (PE 318.508/def.).
poudarja, da je treba s potrditvijo pravice do peticije v skladu z novo Ustavo uvesti splošna pravila upravljanja za vse institucije Skupnosti in države članice v skladu s kodeksom dobrega administrativnega ravnanja, ki ga je sestavil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in potrdil Evropski parlament;
Emphasises that, with the confirmation of the right of petition under the new Constitution, common rules of conduct for all Community institutions and Member States must be established along the lines of the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour drawn up by the European Ombudsman and endorsed by the European Parliament;
poudarja, da je pri obravnavi peticij prisotnost predstavnika Sveta ali vlade zadevne države članice na sejah odbora avtomatična, zlasti če peticija zadeva pravna vprašanja in cilje Evropske unije, ki so tesno povezani z nacionalno zakonodajo zadevne države članice ali so v zvezi s politično občutljivimi temami za določeno državo članico; zahvaljuje se državam članicam, ki so sodelovale na ta način, a kljub temu vztraja, da sedanje predsedstvo preuči načine, kako izboljšati udeležbo Sveta pri dejavnostih Odbora, na primer z imenovanjem višjega uradnika, ki bi usklajeval zadeve, povezane s peticijami;
Underlines that, in dealing with petitions, the presence of a representative of the Council or of the government of the Member State should be a matter of course at the Committee's meetings, particularly when the petition concerns legal questions and objectives of the European Union which are closely connected with a given Member State's national law or linked to politically sensitive subjects for that Member State, and thanks the Member States who have participated in this way; but nevertheless insists that the Presidency-in-Office examine ways of improving the involvement of the Council in the Committee's activities, possibly by designating a senior official to coordinate matters related to petitions;
poziva, da Svet določi vsem vladnim oddelkom in agencijam držav članic trimesečni rok za pripravo natančnega odgovora Odboru za peticije in predlagateljem peticij ali izjave o razlogih za enomesečni odlog;
Asks that the Council set a three-month deadline for all Government Departments and Agencies of Member States to make a detailed response to the Committee on Petitions and the Petitioner(s), or a statement on the reasons for further delay on a monthly basis;
, omogočila prisotnost Sveta na ustrezni ravni v odborih Evropskega parlamenta;
, will ensure the presence of the Council at an appropriate level in the committees of the European Parliament;
opozarja, da zahteva širitev z desetimi novimi državami članicami od zadevnega odbora povečanje obsega strokovnosti v jezikovnih, pravnih in političnih zadevah, in poudarja potrebo po nadaljevanju okrepitve in prilagajanja sekretariata Odbora, da bo lahko takoj ustrezal novim okoliščinam, ker morajo biti njegove storitve enakopravno razpoložljive vsem državljanom EU; poudarja, da se bodo določili splošni sklepi za nadaljnjo izboljšavo dela Odbora za peticije za poročilo za obdobje 2004-2005 in dodali poročilu v obliki priloge;
Recalls that enlargement, with ten new Member States, requires the relevant committee to increase its range of expertise in linguistic, legal and political terms, and stresses the need to continue to strengthen and adapt the secretariat of the Committee so that it can meet these new circumstances as a matter of urgency, since its services should be equally available to all EU citizens; stresses that a number of general conclusions are being drafted to continue to improve the work of the Committee on Petitions for the 2004-2005 Report, to which they will be attached;
opozarja, da ima Evropski parlament od začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe iz Nice pravico vložiti tožbe pri Sodišču zoper ostale institucije Skupnosti zaradi kršitev pravil o pristojnosti, kršitev bistvenih določb postopka, kršitev Pogodbe ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila v zvezi z njegovo uporabo ali zaradi pooblastil, ne glede na to, ali to vpliva na njegove posebne pravice ali ne;
Notes that the European Parliament, since the Treaty of Nice, has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice against other Community institutions on the grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers, irrespective of whether Parliament's prerogatives are affected or not;
meni, da bi bilo legitimno, če bi Parlament uporabil svoja pooblastila, kot izhajajo iz člena 230 Pogodbe ES, v kolikor bi bilo to potrebno za prenehanje resne kršitve prava Skupnosti, ki se je pokazala v zvezi s preučitvijo na podlagi peticije, in kjer obstaja resno razhajanje v razlagi kljub poskusom razrešitve med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z ozirom na potrebne ukrepe na podlagi prava Skupnosti za varstvo pravic državljanov v predmetni zadevi;
Considers that it would be legitimate for Parliament to make use of its powers under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, if this is necessary in order to bring an end to a serious infringement of Community law which has been revealed in the course of the examination of a petition, and where a significant difference of interpretation persists, despite efforts to resolve it, between Parliament and the Commission as regards the action required by Community law for the protection of citizens' rights in the case concerned;
zahteva, da Svet in Komisija preučita Medinstitucionalni sporazum z Evropskim parlamentom iz leta 1989, da bi predlagateljem peticij nudili bolj učinkovita pravna sredstva in določili jasen ter skladen okvir za nujno sodelovanje med institucijami na zadevnem področju;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to review the 1989 Interinstitutional Agreement with the European Parliament, with a view to affording petitioners a more effective means of redress and defining a clear and coherent framework for essential cooperation between the institutions in the area concerned;
meni, da je treba ustanoviti stalno delovno skupino za izboljšanje in stalno spremljanje obdelave peticij, predloženih Evropskemu parlamentu;
Is of the opinion that a Standing Working Group should be set up to improve and to monitor permanently the processing of petitions submitted to the European Parliament;