natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so ruske oblasti proti Gruzijcem, ki živijo v Rusiji, zaradi njihove narodnosti izvedle številne hude diskriminacijske ukrepe, vključno z izgonom 700 Gruzijcev iz Moskve v Tbilisi ter domnevnim nadlegovanjem gruzijskih vernikov, poslovnežev in šolarjev z izgovorom, da gre za obračun z organiziranim kriminalom in nezakonitimi priseljenci,
whereas a number of seriously discriminatory measures have been taken by the Russian authorities against Georgians living in Russia on the grounds of their ethnicity, including the deportation of nearly 700 Georgians from Moscow to Tbilisi and the alleged harassment of Georgian worshippers, businessmen and schoolchildren under the pretext of a clampdown on organised crime and illegal immigrants,
ker enostranskih gibanj za neodvisnost v Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji ne podpira nobena mednarodna organizacija in ker pod okriljem OVSE in Združenih narodov še naprej potekajo prizadevanja za obnovo suverenosti in ozemeljske celovitosti Gruzije,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Georgia,
ker mora EU v sodelovanju z OVSE ter z drugimi akterji povečati svojo trenutno pomoč pri reševanju sporov v Gruziji in regiji južnega Kavkaza,
whereas the EU must increase its support for the ongoing efforts to resolve the conflicts in Georgia and the South Caucasus region, in cooperation with the OSCE and other parties,
ugotavlja, da je treba zaustavljeni mirovni proces ponovno sprožiti, in poziva k okrepljenemu in usklajenemu prizadevanju EU in OVSE, da bi obe strani nadaljevale pogajanja na osnovi napredka, doseženega v začetnih stopnjah obeh mirovnih načrtov;
Notes that the stagnated peace process needs to be relaunched, and calls for an enhanced and combined effort by the European Union and the OSCE to bring the parties back to the negotiating table, based on the progress made in the initial stages of the two peace plans;
v zvezi s tem poziva obe strani, naj podpišeta skupni dokument o neuporabi sile in varnostnih zagotovilih ter začneta konstruktivna pogajanja in se tako premakneta z mrtve točke; obžaluje, da zasedanje skupne komisije za nadzor dne 12. in 13. oktobra 2006 v Vladikavkazu ni prineslo rezultatov;
Calls, in that connection, on both parties to sign the joint document on refraining from the use of force and on security guarantees and to engage in constructive negotiations in order to overcome the present stalemate; regrets the fact that the meeting of the JCC, which took place in Vladikavkaz on 12-13 October 2006, did not yield any results;
meni, da sta popolna demilitarizacija in razorožitev na spornem območju, razen skupnih mirovnih sil OVSE, bistven pogoj preprečevanja spora ter prvi bistven korak k nadaljnjim ukrepom za krepitev zaupanja; zato poziva Rusijo, naj se vzdrži vojaških vaj in razkazovanja kakršne koli vojaške moči v neposredni bližini gruzijskih teritorialnih voda;
Takes the view that the full demilitarisation of, and a reduction in the number of weapons in, the conflict area, with the exception of the OSCE joint peacekeeping force, is a fundamental element of conflict prevention and a first essential step towards further confidence-building measures; therefore calls on Russia to refrain from holding military exercises and displaying any kind of military force in close proximity to Georgia's territorial waters;
poudarja, da so za reševanje ozemeljskih sporov v Gruziji nujne nepristranske in učinkovite mirovne operacije; v zvezi s tem z zanimanjem preučuje nove predloge o obstoječih tristranskih skupnih mirovnih silah, nameščenih na spornem območju okoli mirovne črte med Gruzijo in Južno Osetijo; opozarja, da bi morale nove mirovne sile za boj proti kriminalu in anarhiji imeti tudi podporo policije; poudarja, da mora biti EU pripravljena svoje čete po potrebi nameniti mirovnim silam;
Stresses that neutral, effective and impartial peacekeeping operations are essential for resolving territorial conflicts in Georgia; looks with interest, in that connection, to new proposals concerning the existing tripartite joint peacekeeping force deployed in the conflict area around the ceasefire line between Georgia and South Ossetia; points out that a new force should incorporate an element of police support, to combat crime and lawlessness; stresses that the EU should be prepared, if necessary, to commit troops to a new peacekeeping force;
poziva ruske državne oblasti, naj nemudoma prenehajo z zatiranjem in nadlegovanjem ter ustavijo obtožbe predstavnikov državnih institucij proti osebam gruzijske narodnosti, ki živijo v Rusiji;
Calls on the Russian state authorities to halt immediately all acts of repression and harassment carried out and all accusations made by representatives of official state institutions against ethnic Georgians living in Russia;
poziva ruske oblasti, naj prekličejo vse ukrepe, ki so jih je nedavno uvedle proti Gruziji in gruzijskemu narodu na svojem ozemlju; hkrati poziva ruske oblasti, naj prekličejo neutemeljeno prepoved uvoza proizvodov iz Moldavije in Gruzije;
Calls on the Russian authorities to rescind all the measures recently taken against Georgia and against the Georgian population on its territory; calls, further, on the Russian authorities to lift their unjustified import ban on products from Moldova and Georgia;
poziva Rusijo, naj sprejme dejstvo, da je hladne vojne konec, in naj opusti zastarele poglede o izključnih območjih vpliva;
Calls on Russia to accept the realities which emerged after the end of the Cold War and to abandon outdated thinking about exclusive zones of influence;
pozdravlja sklenitev in podpis akcijskega načrta za Gruzijo v okviru evropske sosedske politike; pričakuje, da bo njegovo izvajanje še bolj spodbudilo politični proces in proces reforme v tej državi; pozdravlja izjave visokega predstavnika za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko Javierja Solane, ki je pred kratkim potrdil, da želi biti EU dejavnejša pri reševanju sporov v Gruziji, ter poziva Svet, naj imenuje posebnega predstavnika EU za Južni Kavkaz, ki bo imel vsa potrebna sredstva za učinkovitejše in vidnejše reševanje sporov;
Welcomes the conclusion and the signing of the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan for Georgia; expects that the implementation thereof will give a further boost to the political and reform process in that country; welcomes the statements by the High Representative for the CFSP, Javier Solana, who recently said that the EU intends to become more actively engaged in the resolution of conflicts in Georgia, and calls on the Council to provide the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus with all the necessary means and resources to make this action more effective and visible;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, gruzijskemu predsedniku in parlamentu, predsedniku in parlamentu Ruske federacije in dejanskim oblastem Južne Osetije ter generalnima sekretarjema Združenih narodov in OVSE.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, , the President and Parliament of Georgia, the President and Parliament of the Russian Federation and the de facto authorities in South Ossetia and the Secretaries-General of the United Nations and the OSCE.
B6-0545 , 0571 , 0573 , 0574 , 0575 in 0576/2006
B6-0545 , 0571 , 0573 , 0574 , 0575 and 0576/2006
ob upoštevanju Konvencije o nadzoru prehoda nevarnih odpadkov preko meja in njihovega odstranjevanja (Baselska konvencija), sprejete dne 22. marca 1989 in odobrene s strani Skupnosti s Sklepom 93/98/EGS UL L 39, 16.2.1993, str.
having regard to the Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (the Basel Convention), adopted on 22 March 1989 and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 93/98/EEC, OJ L 39, 16.2.1993, p.
, in na njej temelječe prepovedi vsega izvoza nevarnih odpadkov iz držav OECD v ostale države,
and the ban pursuant thereto on all exports of hazardous waste from the OECD to non-OECD countries,
ob upoštevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti o pošiljanju odpadkov, zlasti Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 259/93 z dne 1. februarja 1993 o nadzorovanju in kontroli pošiljk odpadkov znotraj Evropske skupnosti, v Skupnost in iz nje UL L 30, 6.2.1993, str.
having regard to Community legislation on shipment of waste, in particular Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of 1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments of waste within, into and out of the European Community, OJ L 30, 6.2.1993, p.
in Uredbe (ES) št. 1013/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 14. junija 2006 o pošiljkah odpadkov UL L 190, 12.7.2006, str.
and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 on shipments of waste, OJ L 190, 12.7.2006, p.
, ki razveljavlja Uredbo (EGS) št. 259/93 od dne 12. julija 2007 dalje,
which repeals Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 as of 12 July 2007,
ker je bilo na več območij v okolici Abidžana, Slonokoščena obala, kjer živi 5 milijonov ljudi, odloženih približno 500 ton kemičnih odpadkov,
whereas around 500 tonnes of chemical waste have been dumped in several areas in the neighbourhood of Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire, where 5 million people live,
B ker je doslej umrlo osem ljudi, 85 000 pa jih je bilo odpeljanih v bolnišnico na zdravljenje zaradi krvavitev iz nosu, diareje, slabosti, očesnega vnetja in težav z dihanjem; ker so lahko posledice odlaganja strupenih odpadkov daljnosežne ter vključujejo onesnaženje tal, površinskih voda in podtalnice,
whereas eight people have died so far and some 85 000 have been taken to hospital for treatment for nosebleeds, diarrhoea, nausea, eye irritation and breathing difficulties; whereas the consequences of this dumping of toxic waste may be far-reaching, including soil contamination and surface and groundwater pollution,
ker je zastrupitev zlasti hudo prizadela večje število otrok: po ocenah Unicefa bo med 9 000 in 23 000 otrok potrebovalo zdravniško pomoč ter bo treba zagotoviti zdravstveno nego in ukrepe za očiščenje okolja, kjer živijo,
whereas this poisoning has affected in a particularly severe way a great number of children: as estimated by UNICEF, between 9 000 and 23 000 children will need medical assistance and health care and other measures to clean up the environment where they live will be required,
ker je strupene odpadke odložil tanker, ki je v grški lasti, pluje pod panamsko zastavo in ga ima v najemu družba Trafigura Beheer B.V. s sedežem na Nizozemskem, in ker takšno razprševanje odgovornosti povzroča ponavljajočo se in nesprejemljivo težavo za izvajanje zakonodaje Skupnosti,
whereas the toxic waste was dumped by a Greek-owned, Panamanian-flagged tanker leased by Trafigura Beheer B.V., a Netherlands-based company; whereas such sharing of responsibilities creates a systematic and unacceptable problem with regard to the enforcement of Community legislation,
ker je v severnih državah odstranjevanje nevarnih odpadkov zaradi okoljskih predpisov postalo drago,
whereas environmental regulations in the Northern countries have made it expensive to dispose of hazardous waste,
ker so organi amsterdamskega pristanišča pri raztovarjanju odkrili, da gre za nevarne odpadke, ter zahtevali višjo pristojbino za dokončanje raztovarjanja, čemur je sledila odločitev osebja na tankerju, da odpadke prečrpa nazaj na krov; ker so nizozemski organi dovolili ladji, da zapusti njihovo ozemlje, čeprav jim je bilo znano, da gre za nevarne odpadke in da kapetan ni hotel plačati za varno odložitev odpadkov na Nizozemskem,
whereas the Amsterdam port authorities found out about the hazardous nature of the waste upon unloading, and asked for a higher fee to complete the unloading, following which the tanker chose instead to pump the waste back on board; whereas the Netherlands authorities allowed the ship to leave their territory despite knowing about the hazardous nature of the waste and about the captain's unwillingness to pay for environmentally sound disposal in the Netherlands,
ker je družba imela možnost, da bi odpadke zakonito in varno odložila v Evropi, ampak se je odločila za cenejšo alternativo na Slonokoščeni obali,
whereas the company had the opportunity to dispose of the waste in a legal and safe manner in Europe, but chose a cheaper alternative in Côte d'Ivoire,
ker je Afrika kraj, kamor se odlaga vse možne vrste nevarnih odpadkov; ker je Greenpeace odkril 80 lokacij, kjer so bili odloženi nevarni odpadki iz razvitih držav, vključno s starimi računalniki v Nigeriji, radioaktivnimi cisternami v Somaliji, klorom v Kamerunu itd.,
whereas Africa is a dumping ground for all kinds of hazardous waste; whereas Greenpeace has identified 80 sites where hazardous waste from developed countries has been dumped, including old computers in Nigeria, radioactive tanks in Somalia, dumping of chlorine in Cameroon, etc.,
ker je ves izvoz odpadkov za odložitev iz EU prepovedan od maja 1994 v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 259/93; ker je izvoz nevarnih odpadkov iz EU v države, ki niso članice OECD, za predelavo prepovedan od januarja 1997 v skladu s to uredbo,
whereas all exports from the EU of waste for disposal have been prohibited since May 1994, pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 259/93; whereas the export of hazardous waste from the EU to non-OECD countries for recovery has been prohibited since January 1997, pursuant to that Regulation,
ker je odložitev nevarnih odpadkov v Slonokoščeni obali le vrh ledene gore vrstečih se primerov pošiljanja nevarnih odpadkov iz EU v države, ki niso članice OECD; ker se s pretvezo "ponovne uporabe" odloži v države, ki niso članice OECD, velike količine odpadne električne in elektronske opreme; ker je bilo precejšnje število starih ladij iz EU, naloženih s strupenimi snovmi, odloženih v Aziji v razmerah, ki so izredno škodljive za delavce in okolje,
whereas the dumping of hazardous waste in Côte d'Ivoire is just the tip of the iceberg of ongoing shipments of hazardous waste from the EU to non-OECD countries; whereas very large amounts of waste electrical and electronic equipment are being dumped in non-OECD countries under the pretext of "reuse"; whereas a significant number of old EU ships laden with toxic substances and materials are being scrapped in Asia under conditions that are extremely harmful to workers and the environment,
ker je Parlament na prvi obravnavi dne 9. aprila 2002 sprejel stališče o predlogu direktive o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
whereas it adopted at first reading on 9 April 2002 a position on the proposal for a directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
; ker Svet nikoli ni sprejel političnega sporazuma o tem predlogu in je namesto tega raje sprejel okvirni sklep v okviru tretjega stebra o isti temi (Okvirni sklep Sveta 2003/80/PNZ z dne 27. januarja 2003 UL L 29, 5.2.2003, str.
; whereas the Council never adopted a political agreement on this proposal and favoured, instead, a third pillar framework decision on the same subject (Council Framework Decision 2003/80/JHA of 27 January 2003 OJ L 29, 5.2.2003, p.
); ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v svoji sodbi v zadevi C-176/03 z dne 13. septembra 2005 ta okvirni sklep razveljavilo,
); whereas the Court of Justice of the European Communities annulled the framework decision in its judgment of 13 September 2005 in Case C-176/03,
poziva Komisijo, Nizozemsko in Slonokoščeno obalo, da izčrpno raziščejo primer, določijo odgovornost na vseh ravneh, privedejo pred sodišče krivce za ta okoljski zločin in zagotovijo popolno sanacijo okoljskega onesnaženja, pa tudi izplačilo odškodnine žrtvam;
Calls on the Commission, the Netherlands and Côte d'Ivoire to investigate this case fully, to establish responsibility at all levels, to bring to justice those responsible for this environmental crime and to ensure full remediation of the environmental contamination, as well as compensation for the victims;
poziva institucije EU in države članice, da sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev vse potrebne pomoči prizadetim prebivalcem, zlasti otrokom, pri čemer naj uporabijo vsa razpoložljiva sredstva podpore, sodelovanja in civilne zaščite;
Calls on the EU institutions and the Member States to take all necessary measures to provide full assistance to the population affected and in particular to children, by using all available means of support, cooperation and civil protection;
meni, da so bile pri izvozu nevarnih odpadkov v Abidžan očitno kršene tako zakonodaja Skupnosti kot mednarodne konvencije, zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev popolnega izvajanja obstoječe zakonodaje, ki ureja pošiljanje odpadkov;
Considers that both Community legislation and international conventions were clearly violated in the case of the exporting of hazardous waste to Abidjan, and therefore calls on the Commission and the Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure full enforcement of the existing waste shipment legislation;
zahteva od Komisije in zadevnih držav članic, da javno objavijo vse dvostranske sporazume, ki so jih do danes sklenile z državami, ki niso članice OECD, za pošiljanje odpadkov;
Asks the Commission and the Member States concerned to make public all the bilateral agreements they have concluded with non-OECD countries for the shipping of waste;
poziva Komisijo, da zbere podatke o nezakoniti trgovini s takimi nevarnimi odpadki in izdelki ter njihovim odlaganjem v Afriki in drugih državah v razvoju, da predstavi predloge ukrepov za nadzor, zmanjšanje in odpravo nezakonite trgovine, prevoza in odlaganja takih izdelkov v afriških državah in drugih državah v razvoju ter da vsako leto sestavi seznam držav in nadnacionalnih družb, ki nezakonito odlagajo strupene odpadke in izdelke v Afriki in drugih državah v razvoju;
Calls on the Commission to collect information on the illicit trafficking in, and dumping of, such hazardous wastes and products in African and other developing countries, to come forward with proposals for measures to control, reduce and eradicate this illicit trafficking, transfer and dumping of such products in African and other developing countries and to produce annually a list of countries and transnational corporations engaged in the illicit dumping of toxic waste and products in African and other developing countries;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic, generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov, vladi Slonokoščene obale in sekretariatu Baselske konvencije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, the governments of the Member States, the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the government of Côte d'Ivoire and the secretariat of the Basel Convention.
ob upoštevanju predloga Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja UL C 180 E, 26.6.2001, str.
having regard to the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law OJ C 180 E, 26.6.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 9. aprila 2002 z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
having regard to its position of 9 April 2002 with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 9. aprila 2002 o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi okvirnega programa na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji – Policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
having regard to its position of 9 April 2002 on the proposal for a Council decision establishing a framework programme on the basis of Title VI of the Treaty on European Union – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (Zadeva C-176/03, Komisija proti Svetu) (KOM (2005)0583),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03, Commission v. Council) ( COM(2005)0583 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. junija 2006 o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 v zadevi C-176/03 Komisija proti Svetu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0260 .
having regard to its resolution of 14 June 2006 on the consequences of the judgment of the Court of 13 September 2005 (C-176/03, Commission v. Council) Texts adopted of 14.6.2006, P6_TA(2006)0260 .
ker je Sodišče v sodbi z dne 13. septembra 2005 odločilo, da ima zakonodajalec Skupnosti pravico sprejemati ukrepe v zvezi s kazenskim pravom držav članic, za katere meni, da so potrebni za zagotovitev polne učinkovitosti norm, ki jih določa na področju varstva okolja,
whereas the Court of Justice, in its judgment of 13 September 2005, ruled that the Community legislature is entitled to take measures which relate to the criminal law of the Member States which it considers necessary in order to ensure that the rules which it lays down on environmental protection are fully effective,
ker Sodišče meni, da določbe členov 135 in 280(4) Pogodbe ES ne preprečujejo uskladitve kazenskega prava z namenom izvajanja okoljske politike,
whereas the Court of Justice considers that the provisions of Articles 135 and 280(4) of the EC Treaty do not prevent, for the purposes of the implementation of environmental policy, any harmonisation of criminal law,
ker Sodišče meni, da Okvirni sklep, s tem da posega v pristojnosti, ki jih člen 175 Pogodbe ES dodeljuje Skupnosti, v celoti zaradi svoje nedeljivosti krši člen 47 Pogodbe EU,
whereas the Court of Justice considers that 'the entire framework decision, being indivisible, infringes Article 47 of the EU Treaty as it encroaches on the powers which Article 175 of the EC Treaty confers on the Community',
ker Komisija v svojem zgoraj navedenem sporočilu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 navaja, da določbe kazenskega prava, ki so potrebne za učinkovito izvajanje prava Skupnosti, izhajajo iz Pogodbe ES,
whereas the Commission, in its abovementioned communication on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005, stated that the provisions of criminal law required for the effective implementation of Community law are a matter for the EC Treaty,
ker je treba pozdraviti stališče Sodišča, kot ga je Komisija ponovno obrazložila, saj podpira stališče, ki ga je zavzel Parlament v resoluciji z dne 3. septembra 2003 o pravni podlagi in skladnosti s pravom Skupnosti UL C 76 E, 25.3.2004, str.
whereas the position taken by the Court of Justice, as re-interpreted by the Commission, is to be welcomed as it endorses the position already taken by the European Parliament in its resolution of 3 September 2003 on legal bases and compliance with Community law OJ C 76 E, 25.3.2004, p.
pozdravlja sodbo Sodišča, ki je Okvirni sklep o varstvu okolja, pomotoma sprejetega v okviru tretjega namesto v okviru prvega stebra, razglasila za ničnega;
Welcomes the judgment of the Court of Justice, which annulled the framework decision on environmental protection which had been adopted mistakenly under the third, rather than the first, pillar;
meni, da sprejetje Okvirnega sklepa s strani Sveta kaže, da države članice priznavajo, da so kazenskopravni instrumenti potrebni za boljše uveljavljanje okoljevarstvene zakonodaje;
Considers that the adoption of the framework decision by the Council shows that the Member States recognise that criminal law instruments are necessary to strengthen the enforcement of environmental protection laws;