natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva EU in njene države članice, da bolj izkoristijo svojo možnost vplivanja, da bi EU igrala vlogo, ki jo lahko ima kot vodja skupine demokratičnih držav z dobrim stanjem na področju človekovih pravic; meni, da je mogoče to vlogo vodje najbolje uresničiti s spodbujanjem partnerstva z državami iz drugih regionalnih skupin, kar je razvidno iz več pobud EU v sistemu Združenih narodov, kot so resolucije Generalne skupščine o moratoriju na smrtno kazen in o pravici do vode;
Calls on the EU and its Member States to make better use of their potential influence in order to exercise the role that it could play as the leader of a group of democratic countries with solid human rights records; considers that this leadership role can be best achieved by enhancing the partnerships with states from other regional groups, as shown by several EU initiatives within the UN system, such as the General Assembly resolutions on a moratorium on the death penalty and on the right to water;
poziva EU in države članice, da bolj zavzeto sodelujejo z drugimi demokratičnimi članicami UNHRC, vključno z državami iz afriške in azijske skupine ter predvsem z demokratičnimi državami, ki spoštujejo mednarodno vladavino prava; meni, da nigerijsko predsedovanje UNHRC pomeni priložnost za EU v zvezi s tem;
Calls on the EU and its Member States to interact more energetically with other democratic members of the UNHRC, including countries within the African and Asian groups, and especially with democratic states abiding by the international rule of law; considers that the current Nigerian Presidency of the UNHRC represents a window of opportunity for the EU in this respect;
poziva EU, da organizira redna srečanja s temi državami glede posebnih vprašanj, kot način za vzpostavitev mehanizma za oblikovanje koalicije in zagotavljanje najširše možne podpore njenih stališč; poudarja potrebo po tem, da se državam članicam EU omogočijo misije v Ženevo in da se vlaga v diplomatske vire s pošiljanjem strokovnjakov s področja človekovih pravic in diplomatov na visoki ravni, da bi usmerjali delovanje UNHRC;
Calls on the EU to organise regular meetings with those countries on specific issues as a way of creating a coalition-building mechanism and of ensuring the widest possible support for its positions; stresses the need to empower the EU Member States" Geneva missions and to invest in diplomatic resources by sending human rights specialists and high-level diplomats to steer the UNHRC;
poziva k večjemu usklajevanju in sodelovanju med ustreznimi delovnimi skupinami Sveta EU, ki delujejo v Bruslju, in uradi EU ter stalnimi predstavništvi držav članic EU v New Yorku in Ženevi; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja učinkovito decentralizacijo vsakodnevnega odločanja iz Bruslja v Ženevo, pri čemer prestolnici ohranjata pomembno usklajevalno vlogo;
Calls for closer coordination and cooperation between the relevant Brussels-based working groups of the Council of the EU and the EU Offices and the EU Member States' Permanent Representations in New York and Geneva; in this respect, welcomes the effective decentralisation of day-to-day decision-making from Brussels to Geneva, with capitals retaining an important coordinating role;
ponovno poziva EU, naj učinkoviteje uporabi svojo pomoč in politično podporo tretjim državam ter druge instrumente, kot so dialogi in posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah, da zagotovi širše soglasje o svojih pobudah ali pobudah, pri oblikovanju katerih sodeluje, ki naj jih vodi spoštovanje mednarodnega prava in splošno priznanih standardov na področju človekovih pravic ter spodbujanje demokratičnih reform; obenem poziva države članice EU in Komisijo, da pri določanju ciljev in prednostnih nalog programov pomoči EU upoštevajo rezultate dela UNHRC v zvezi z določeno državo, vključno s priporočili in zaključki splošnega rednega pregleda;
Once again calls on the EU to make more effective use of its aid and political support to third countries, as well as other instruments such as human rights dialogues and consultations, with a view to guaranteeing broader agreement on its initiatives or initiatives that it co-sponsors, which should be guided by respect for international law and universally recognised human rights standards and the promotion of democratic reforms; at the same time, calls on the EU Member States and the Commission to take into account the outcome of the UNHRC's work vis-à-vis a given State, including the recommendations and conclusions of the UPR, when defining the objectives and priorities of EU assistance programmes;
obžaluje, da EU ni mogla predstaviti pomembnih prednostnih nalog za delo UNHRC in je bila večkrat prisiljena v stališče "omejevanja škode", kot zlasti v primeru "Kodeksa ravnanja glede posebnih postopkov", ki ga je leta 2007 predlagala afriška skupina; poziva EU, da sprejme bolj proaktivno strategijo in podvoji svoja prizadevanja, da bi vplivala na program in razprave UNHRC;
Regrets the fact that the EU has not been able to present substantial priorities for the work of the UNHRC and has on several occasions been forced into a "damage limitation" attitude, as in the case, most notably, of the "Code of Conduct for Special Procedures" proposed in 2007 by the African Group; calls on the EU to adopt a more pro-active strategy and to redouble its efforts to influence the UNHRC's agenda and its debates;
čeprav je stanje na področju človekovih pravic v državah članicah EU boljše kot v mnogo drugih članicah UNHRC, meni, da bodo dejavnosti EU učinkovitejše, če ji ne bo mogoče očitati dvojnih meril in selektivnosti v lastnih politikah o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji; zato poziva EU, da izpolni svojo obveznost glede spodbujanja spoštovanja človekovih pravic v vseh regijah na svetu in na vseh področjih; v zvezi s tem poziva EU, da se aktivno vključi v pregled konference v Durbanu, ki bo potekala leta 2009, pri tem pa naj predvsem upošteva, da je treba izvajati resolucijo Generalna skupščina Združenih narodov A/RES/62/149 z dne 18. decembra 2007, ki poziva k vsesplošnemu moratoriju na smrtno kazen;
Considers that, while EU Member States have better human rights records than many other UNHRC members, EU action would be more effective if it cannot be accused of applying double standards and of being selective in its own human rights and democracy policies; therefore calls on the EU to live up to its commitment to boost human rights in all regions in the world and on all issues; in this respect, calls on the EU to engage actively in the review of the Durban Conference which is to take place in 2009, bearing in mind in particular the need to implement the UN General Assembly's resolution A/RES/62/149 of 18 December 2007 calling for a universal moratorium on the death penalty;
spodbuja redno udeležbo delegacij Parlamenta na zasedanjih UNHRC v Ženevi; pozdravlja pobudo pododbora za človekove pravice, da na svoja srečanja povabi nosilce mandatov za posebne postopke in predsedstvo UNHRC, in poziva, naj se ta praksa nadaljuje;
Encourages the regular attendance of Parliament's delegations at the sessions of the UNHRC in Geneva; welcomes the initiative of Parliament's Subcommittee on Human Rights to invite Special Procedures mandate-holders as well as the Presidency of the UNHRC to its meetings, and calls for this practice to be continued;
ponovno poudarja potrebo po jasni viziji, političnem programu in dolgoročni strategiji glede delovanja UNHRC ter glede dejavnosti držav članic EU znotraj tega organa, zlasti kar zadeva pregled UNHRC, ki ga je treba opraviti do leta 2011; meni, da mora ta strategija vključevati jasna merila; v zvezi s tem poziva EU, naj:
Reaffirms the need for a clear vision, political agenda and long-term strategy as regards the functioning of the UNHRC as well as the activities of EU Member States within that body, especially as regards the review of the UNHRC to be undertaken in 2011; considers that this strategy should include clear benchmarks; in this respect, calls on the EU to:
ponovno potrdi in strogo zagovarja načela univerzalnosti, neločljivosti in medsebojne odvisnosti človekovih pravic,
reaffirm and strongly defend the principles of the universality, indivisibility and interdependence of human rights;
zagotovi ohranitev in okrepitev sposobnosti UNHRC za obravnavanje razmer v posameznih državah, vključno z mandati držav,
ensure that the ability of the UNHRC to address country situations, including through country mandates, is preserved and reinforced;
zagotovi neodvisnost in učinkovitost posebnih postopkov na splošno in si prizadeva za uresničitev obveznosti sodelovanja s posebnimi postopki za članice UNHRC,
ensure the independence and effectiveness of Special Procedures in general, and work towards the realisation of the obligation to cooperate with Special Procedures for members of the UNHRC;
si prizadeva za okrepitev neodvisnih mehanizmov za nadzor in ugotovitev v postopku splošnega rednega pregleda,
work towards the strengthening of independent monitoring mechanisms and findings in the UPR process;
ponovno potrdi posebno vlogo UNHRC kot glavnega in legitimnega mednarodnega foruma o človekovih pravicah in njegove dopolnilne vloge v zvezi z drugimi organi Združenih narodov,
reaffirm the UNHRC's specific role as the principal and legitimate international human rights forum and its complementarity vis-à-vis other UN bodies;
ščiti neodvisnost Urada visokega komisarja za človekove pravice,
safeguard the independence of the OHCHR;
krepi svojo strategijo za zunanje oblikovanje koalicije, predvsem z medregionalnimi pobudami,
reinforce its external coalition-building strategy, notably through cross-regional initiatives;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic EU in držav članic UNHRC, predsedniku Generalne skupščine Združenih narodov, generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov in Uradu visokega komisarja za človekove pravice.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the EU and UNHRC Member States, the President of the UN General Assembly, the UN Secretary-General and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. januarja 2009 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001) ( 2007/2154(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 14 January 2009 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001) ( 2007/2154(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in zlasti člena 254 o obveznosti objavljanja aktov ter člena 255(2) o pravici državljanov in prebivalcev EU do dostopa do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije,
having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular to Article 254 on the obligation to publish acts and Article 255(2) on EU citizens' and residents" right to access European Parliament, Council and Commission documents,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES in zlasti člena 207(3) o obveznosti Sveta, da v svojem poslovniku opredeli pogoje, pod katerimi ima javnost dostop do dokumentov Sveta,
having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular to Article 207(3) on the Council's obligation to specify in its rules of procedure the conditions under which the public shall have access to Council documents,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe EU in zlasti člena 1 (načelo odprtosti kot eno splošnih načel Unije), člena 6 (demokracija), člena 28(1) in člena 41(1) (uresničevanje pravice dostopa do dokumentov, povezanih s skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko ter policijskim in pravosodnim sodelovanjem v kazenskih zadevah),
having regard to the EU Treaty, and notably to Article 1 (principle of openness as one of the general principles of the Union), Article 6 (democracy), Article 28(1) and Article 41(1) (application of the right of access to documents relating to the common foreign and security policy and to police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters),
ob upoštevanju členov 10 in 16 Pogodbe EU, kot naj bi se spremenila z Lizbonsko pogodbo, ter členov 15 in 298 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 10 and 16 of the Treaty on European Union as it is due to be amended by the Treaty of Lisbon and to Articles 15 and 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti njenih členov 41 (pravica do dobrega upravljanja) in 42 (pravica dostopa do dokumentov),
having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and notably to its Articles 41 (right to good administration) and 42 (right of access to documents),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES, Euratom) št. 1700/2003 z dne 22. septembra 2003 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS, Euratom) št. 354/83 o odpiranju za javnost arhivskega gradiva Evropske gospodarske skupnosti in Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo UL L 243, 27.9.2003, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community OJ L 243, 27.9.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (Sodišče) in Sodišča prve stopnje o dostopu do dokumentov, še zlasti nedavnih sodb Sodišča prve stopnje v zadevah Bavarian Lager Co.
having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) and of the Court of First Instance on access to documents, and notably to the recent judgments of the Court of First Instance in Bavarian Lager Co.
Ltd proti Komisiji Evropskih skupnosti (zadeva T-194/04) ter Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti (Sodišče) v zadevi Kraljevina Švedska in Maurizio Turco proti Svetu Evropske unije (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, "sodba Sodišča v zadevi Turco"),
Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Case T-194/04) and of the ECJ in Kingdom of Sweden and Maurizio Turco vs Council of the European Union (joined cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P, the "ECJ Judgment in the Turco case"),
ob upoštevanju dejavnosti in dokumentov, ki sta jih glede vprašanja dostopa do dokumentov pripravila evropski varuh človekovih pravic, pa tudi evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov,
having regard to the activities and documents produced by the European Ombudsman on the issue of access to documents, as well as by the European Data Protection Supervisor,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 30. aprila 2008 o Uredbi Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije ( KOM(2008)0229 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal of 30 April 2008 for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents ( COM(2008)0229 ),
ob upoštevanju osnutka Konvencije Sveta Evrope o dostopu do uradnih dokumentov,
having regard to the Draft Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents,
ob upoštevanju ustnih vprašanj Svetu in Komisiji o izvršitvi sodbe Sodišča v zadevi "Turco" ( O-87/2008 in O-88/2008 ),
having regard to the Oral Questions to the Council and the Commission on the implementation of the ECJ Judgment in the Turco case ( O-87/2008 and O-88/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju letnih poročil Sveta, Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta o dostopu do dokumentov za leto 2006, pa tudi člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001,
having regard to the Annual Reports for 2006 from the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament on access to documents, as well as to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001,
ob upoštevanju členov 45 in 97(7) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 45 and Rule 97(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0459/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0459/2008 ),
ker demokracije, ki temeljijo na načelih pravne države, zavezuje načelo javnega značaja pravil, ki zadevajo državljane, zaradi česar morajo institucije EU zagotoviti odprtost in preglednost, kar še zlasti velja za procese odločanja, tako da so seje, razprave in glasovanja demokratičnih zakonodajnih organov javni, na voljo pa so tudi osnutki zakonov in z njimi povezana besedila,
whereas democracies based on the rule of law are bound by the principle of publicity of the rules that affect citizens, which implies a duty of openness and transparency for the EU institutions and notably of their decision-making processes, so that democratic legislative bodies hold their meetings, discussions and votes in public, while draft laws and related texts are also available,
ker imajo državljani – da se zagotovi odgovornost in legitimnost demokratičnega političnega sistema – pravico vedeti:
whereas, in order to ensure the accountability and legitimacy of a democratic political system, citizens have a right to know:
kako delujejo njihovi zastopniki po tem, ko so izvoljeni ali imenovani v javne organe ali ko zastopajo države članice na evropski ali mednarodni ravni (načelo odgovornosti),
how their representatives act, once elected or appointed to public bodies or representing the Member States at European or international level (principle of accountability),
kako deluje proces odločanja (vključno z dokumenti, predlogi sprememb, urnikom, udeleženimi akterji, oddanimi glasovi itd.),
how the decision-making process works (including documents, amendments, timetable, players involved, votes cast, etc),
koliko javnega denarja je dodeljenega in porabljenega ter s kakšnimi rezultati (načelo sledljivosti sredstev),
how public money is allocated, spent and with which results (principle of traceability of funds),
ker sta mednarodna skupnost in Evropska unija, na podlagi izkušenj njenih držav članic, postopoma začeli priznavati resnično "pravico dostopa do dokumentov" in "pravico do obveščenosti", ki temeljita na načelih demokracije, javnosti, preglednosti in odprtosti,
whereas the international community and the European Union, on the basis of the experience of its Member States, have progressively come to recognize a true "right of access to documents" and a "right to information" based on the principles of democracy, publicity, transparency and openness,
ker je iz količinskih podatkov v letnih poročilih o uporabi Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 s strani institucij EU mogoče sklepati, da je bil dostop do dokumentov dovoljen v večjem številu zadev (splošno zmanjšanje števila in deleža zavrnitev), pri čemer se med institucijami EU razlikujejo razlogi za zavrnitve (najbolj pogost je varstvo postopka odločanja), in pa, kar zadeva dokumente občutljive narave, da Komisija in Parlament v svoje registre nista uvrstila nobenega tovrstnega dokumenta, medtem ko je Svet v svoj register uvrstil 79 dokumentov občutljive narave od skupaj 409 dokumentov; ker se zdi na podlagi kvalitativne analize očitno, da je bilo nekaj določb iz te uredbe glede pravilnega načina njene uporabe različno interpretiranih, zaradi česar so se državljani obrnili na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in na Sodišče,
whereas quantitative data contained in the Annual Reports in relation to the application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 by the EU institutions suggest that access to documents has been granted in a higher number of cases (general decrease in the number and rate of refusals), while reasons for refusal vary among EU institutions (the first one being the protection of the decision-making process) and that as regards sensitive documents, the Commission and Parliament did not enter any such document in their registers, while the Council entered 79 sensitive documents out of 409 in its register; whereas from a qualitative analysis it appears clearly that a number of provisions of that Regulation gave rise to divergent interpretations as to the correct way to apply it, which led citizens to address the European Ombudsman and the ECJ,
ker Svet vključi medinstitucionalno referenčno številko le v omejeno število dokumentov, v nasprotju s členom 11(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, s čimer otežuje povezovanje dokumentov s postopki ter dokumentom tudi zniža raven pomembnosti na "gradiva za seje", ki se ne registrirajo, ali jih obravnava kot "diplomatske dokumente", s čimer izniči pravico državljanov do dostopa do njih,
whereas the Council inserts the interinstitutional reference number only in a limited number of documents, contrary to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, thereby making it difficult to associate a document with a procedure, while it also either downgrades documents to "room documents" that are not registered, or treats them as "diplomatic" documents, hereby nullifying citizens' right of access to documents,
ker je treba skladno z uvodno izjavo 6 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 zagotoviti tudi dostop do dokumentov, izdelanih v skladu s postopkom prenesenih pristojnosti (komitologija) in ker se devet desetin pripravljene zakonodaje sprejme v skladu s tem postopkom, zaradi česar je treba v tem okviru v celoti zagotoviti ustrezen in pregleden demokratični nadzor,
whereas according to Recital 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, access should also be granted to documents produced under the delegated powers procedure (comitology) and whereas nine-tenths of the legislation produced is adopted under that procedure and, accordingly, proper and transparent Parliamentary and democratic scrutiny should be fully guaranteed within that framework,
ker je svetovni splet postal poglavitni način za vpogled državljanov v dokumente EU, pri čemer se je povečalo število dokumentov, ki jih institucije EU dajo na voljo prek spleta, zaradi česar je treba sedaj dodatno izboljšati prijaznost spletnih strani institucij EU in dokumentnih spletnih strani do uporabnika in njihovo medsebojno povezanost ter oblikovati enotni portal EU za dostopanje do vseh dokumentov, postopkov in institucij,
whereas the Internet has become the main way for citizens to consult EU documents, while the number of documents made available by EU institutions on-line has increased, which creates a need now to further improve the user-friendliness of EU institutions' and documents websites, their interconnection and the creation of a single EU portal to access all EU documents, procedures and institutions,
ker bi morale institucije EU sedaj narediti nadaljnje korake v smeri večje preglednosti, odprtosti in demokracije in se zavzeti za "akt EU o prostem dostopu do informacij", saj je pri izvajanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 pozornost javnosti pritegnilo več pomanjkljivosti; ker bi morale institucije EU nujno analizirati in izvršiti nedavne sodbe, med tem ko je Komisija objavila svoj predlog revizije Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001,
whereas the EU institutions should now take further steps towards greater transparency, openness and democracy by moving towards an "EU Freedom of Information Act", as in the application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 a series of shortcomings have been brought to public attention, recent judgments need to be analysed and implemented urgently by the EU institutions, while the Commission has issued its proposal for a revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001,
ter da je v tej sodbi Sodišče prišlo do naslednjih zaključkov:
and that in that judgment, the Court reached the following conclusions:
pravica dostopa javnosti do dokumentov institucij EU izhaja iz demokratičnega značaja teh institucij, kot je določeno v uvodni izjavi 4 in členu 1 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001,
the public right of access to the documents of the EU institutions derives from the democratic character of those institutions, as provided for in Recital 4 and Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001,