natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da mora EU zavarovati svoje zunanje meje, zaščititi svojo življenjsko pomembno infrastrukturo, uničiti mednarodna omrežja za financiranje terorizma in se boriti proti organiziranemu kriminalu; s tem v zvezi poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj razvijejo sistem integriranega upravljanja zunanjih meja EU, ne da bi omejile spoštovanje človekovih in temeljnih pravic ter humanitarnega prava, zlasti glede beguncev in prosilcev za azil;
Points out that the EU has to secure its external borders, protect its vital infrastructures, eliminate international terrorist funding networks and fight against organised crime; in this regard, calls on the Commission and the Member States to develop a system of integrated management of the EU's external borders, without limiting respect for human and fundamental rights, as well as humanitarian law, especially with regard to refugees and asylum seekers;
poudarja, da mora EU:
Points out that the EU has to:
zagotoviti prost pretok dobave za industrijo in posamezne potrošnike, zlasti ogljikovodikov, kar pomeni zavarovanje ladijskega prometa, poletov in cevovodov;
secure the free flow of supplies for industry and individual consumers, and of hydrocarbons in particular, which entails the security of shipping, flights and pipelines;
zagotoviti zaščito pred kibernetskimi napadi, ki lahko prekinejo osnovne komunikacijske, finančne in energetske sisteme;
defend itself against a cyber attack which may disrupt vital communications, financial or energy systems;
Hitro ukrepanje na podlagi Ustanovne listine ZN
Rapid action on the basis of the UN Charter
potrjuje dejstvo, da EVS – ob domnevi, da mora biti, glede na nove grožnje, EU pripravljena ukrepati še preden izbruhne kriza ter sprejeti zgodnje preprečevalne ukrepe za obvladovanje sporov in groženj – brez pridržkov temelji na Ustanovni listini ZN kot temeljnem okviru mednarodnih odnosov;
Endorses the fact that the ESS, while assuming that the EU, in the light of new threats, must be ready to act before crises break out and take early preventive action to deal with conflicts and threats, bases itself in doing so unreservedly on the UN Charter, as the fundamental framework for international relations;
Pravila ravnanja/usposabljanje
Rules of conduct/training
toplo pozdravlja dejstvo, da ravnanje osebja v vseh operacijah EVOP ureja veliko smernic in splošnih pravil ravnanja iz dokumentov; pozdravlja prve znake upoštevanja standardov in določb na področju človekovih pravic v teh smernicah in pravilih; vztraja, da je izpolnjevanje teh pravil v celoti obvezno in da morajo biti poveljniki na dolžnosti odgovorni za disciplino in vedenje svojega osebja, celo v izredno stresnih pogojih v vojnih razmerah; ravno tako je naklonjen prizadevanju, ki bo zagotovilo, da bo razsežnost spola v različnih vrstah politik, programih in pobudah EVOP v prihodnosti pomembnejša;
Greatly welcomes the fact that the behaviour of personnel in all ESDP operations is governed by a range of guidelines and general rules of conduct which are set out in documents; welcomes the initial signs in these guidelines and rules of their observance of human rights standards and rules; insists that compliance with such rules should be totally mandatory and that field commanders should be made accountable for the discipline and conduct of their personnel, even under conditions of extreme stress in war situations; also takes favourable note of the efforts to ensure that the gender dimension will enjoy a higher profile in the various ESDP policies, programmes and initiatives in future;
upošteva prizadevanje Sveta, da se dodatno razvijejo ciljni programi za usposabljanje EVOP – na strateški in operativni ravni – diplomatskega, vojaškega in civilnega osebja; pričakuje, da bo Evropski parlament lahko sodeloval v teh programih; potrjuje pristop k vzpostavitvi minimalnih standardov za usposabljanje osebja v kraju, kjer posreduje EVOP, in poziva Svet, da skupaj s Komisijo in državami članicami standardizira vse ukrepe usposabljanja na vseh ravneh;
Takes note of the Council's efforts to develop further the targeted ESDP training programmes – both strategic and operational – for diplomatic, military and civilian personnel; expects it to be made possible for European Parliament experts to participate in these programmes; endorses the approach of establishing minimum standards for the training of personnel on on-the-spot ESDP missions, and calls on the Council to work together with the Commission and the Member States towards standardising all training measures at all levels;
meni, da bodo vojaki izpostavljeni nepotrebnim tveganjem, če njihova linija poveljevanja, oprema in oborožitev ne bodo dorasle operacijam; zato meni, da je še posebej pomembno zagotoviti ustrezno opremljenost enot, ki bodo pod poveljstvom EU;
Is of the opinion that soldiers will be exposed to unnecessary risks if their chain of command, equipment or armaments do not meet the requirements of the operation; considers it particularly important, therefore, to ensure that the units to be placed under EU command are adequately equipped;
meni, da učinkovita uporaba vojaških zmogljivosti ne bo mogoča brez resne krepitve sposobnosti Evrope, da usmerja svojo moč, vključno s prevozom po zraku in vodi; v tem okviru jemlje na znanje prizadevanja različnih držav, da povečajo svoje sposobnosti zračnega prevoza in amfibijske zmožnosti ter načrte za pridobivanje več letalonosilk;
Is of the opinion that the effective use of military capabilities will not be possible without serious enhancement of European's power projection capacity, including air and sea lift; in this context, acknowledges the efforts of different countries to increase their air transport and amphibious capabilities as well as plans to acquire more aircraft carriers;
se zaveda, da se zaradi različne – pogosto tudi nezdružljive – opreme in oborožitve enot, ki sodelujejo v večnacionalnih posegih, pojavljajo dodatni stroški in zmanjšuje učinkovitost; zato meni, da mora EU spodbujati ukrepe za usklajevanje opreme in oborožitve ob upoštevanju optimizacije virov in učinkovitosti večnacionalnih operacij;
Takes note that, in multinational operations, the use of different – and often incompatible – equipment and armaments by the participating units leads to extra costs and reduced efficiency; therefore considers that the EU should promote measures to harmonise equipment and armaments with a view to optimising resources and the effectiveness of multinational operations;
obsoja še posebej zaskrbljujoče dejstvo, da nimajo vse bojne skupine, ki se trenutno še razvijajo, enakega dostopa do izvidniških podatkov iz zraka in iz vesolja, ter obžaluje, da storitve nacionalnih izvidniških satelitskih sistemov Helios, SAR-Lupe in Cosmo-Skymed niso v enaki meri razpoložljive za vse države članice;
Criticises the particularly serious fact that the battle groups currently under development do not all have the same access to airborne and space-based intelligence, and regrets that the output of the national satellite intelligence-gathering systems Helios, SAR–Lupe and Cosmo-Skymed are not available to all Member States on a common basis;
da bi odpravili te pomanjkljivosti:
In order to meet these shortfalls:
odločno zahteva, da bojne skupine, ki se še razvijajo, dobijo skupno ali vsaj združljivo opremo na obveščevalnem področju in na področju telekomunikacij;
strongly requests that the battle groups under development receive common or at least compatible equipment in the fields of intelligence and telecommunications;
zahteva, da se naslednja generacija satelitskih izvidniških sistemov vključi v evropski sistem, ki bi zagotavljal informacije za vojaške in policijske namene ter za varovanje v primeru nesreč z uporabo satelitskih središč v Torrejónu;
demands that the next generation of satellite intelligence-gathering systems be integrated into a European system whose output would be available for military, police and disaster management purposes using the satellite centre in Torrejón;
poudarja, da Nato, poleg nacionalnih sistemov, ki že obstajajo ali so v fazi razvoja, trenutno razvija zračni izvidniški sistem nadzorovanje zemlje iz zraka (AGS); vztraja pri zahtevi, da je ta sistem na voljo vsem državam članicam EU, zlasti v okviru bojnih skupin EU;
Points out that NATO is currently developing the airborne intelligence-gathering system Airborne Ground Surveillance (AGS) in addition to the national systems that already exist or are under development; insists that this system be made available for all EU Member States, especially in the EU battle groups context;
meni, da je treba na področju telekomunikacij razviti skupen sistem za poveljevanje večnacionalnim enotam; zato je mnenja, da bi morale biti vojaške in policijske enote ter enote civilne zaščite opremljene v skladu z istimi tehničnimi standardi, kot to velja na primer na Finskem;
Considers that, in the telecommunications field, it is necessary to develop a joint system for the command of multinational units; therefore expresses the view that the equipment used by the military, police and emergency services should comply with the same technical standards, as is the case, for example, in Finland;
poudarja pomen povečanja skupnih zmogljivosti EU za obrambo svojih zunanjih meja;ostaja posebej zaskrbljen zaradi nezdružljivosti in kakovosti opreme za nadzor meja ter poudarja potrebo po novih tehnologijah za izboljšanje tega položaja;
Stresses the importance of enhancing the EU's collective capacity to protect its external borders; remains particularly concerned about the incompatibility and quality of border surveillance equipment and underlines the need for new technology to remedy this situation;
ker je prevoz, zlasti strateška preskrba, bistvena pomanjkljivost vseh ukrepov za krizno upravljanje v EU, meni, da bi bilo treba oblikovati samostojen evropski sporazum za zagotavljanje dostopa do konvencionalnega civilnega večmodalnega prevoza, ki bi gradil na celovitem civilno-vojaškem pristopu in zagotavljal ekonomije obsega vsem evropskim udeležencem v kriznem upravljanju za namene EVOP in pomoč ob nesrečah;
Considers that, since transportation, in particular strategic lift, is an essential shortfall in any EU crisis management action, a European self-standing arrangement ensuring access to conventional civil multi-modal transport, building on an integrated civilian/military approach and ensuring economies of scale for all European actors in crisis management for both ESDP and disaster relief purposes, would be of great interest;
meni, da so za politični postopek odločanja, ki nastopi pred odločitvijo o izvedbi misije v okviru EVOP, značilne številne slabosti, kar je bilo videti v primeru posredovanja v Demokratični republiki Kongo; zato poziva Svet, naj revidira različne stopnje tega postopka in, če je to ustrezno, sprejme ukrepe za odpravljanje teh slabosti; v povezavi s tem opozarja Svet, zlasti njegov politični in varnostni odbor, na njegovo obvezo, da se posvetuje s Parlamentom;
Considers that the political decision-making procedure preceding the decision to carry out an ESDP mission displays a number of weaknesses, as was seen in the case of the mission to the Democratic Republic of Congo; therefore calls on the Council to review the various stages of that procedure and, if appropriate, to take steps to eliminate those weaknesses; in this connection, reminds the Council and, in particular, its Political and Security Committee, of its obligation to consult the Parliament;
ponovno potrjuje svojo zahtevo po neomejeni vključenosti in pravici do letnega predhodnega posvetovanja o prihodnjih vidikih in možnostih, kot določajo obstoječe pogodbe; poziva Svet, da uveljavi veliko bolj odprto in pregledno informacijsko politiko do Parlamenta v zvezi s SZVP in EVOP; v povezavi s tem obsoja sedanji postopek po katerem Parlament dostopa do "zaupnih dokumentov" Sveta, ki v večini primerov vsebujejo le zelo splošne podatke;
Reaffirms its demand for unrestricted involvement and also its right to be consulted annually, in advance, on forthcoming aspects of and options for the CFSP, as provided for in the existing Treaties; calls emphatically on the Council to pursue a much more open and transparent information policy, vis-à-vis Parliament, with regard to the CFSP and the ESDP; in this connection, criticises the current procedure for access by Parliament to the Council's "confidential documents", which in most cases contain only very general information;
ponovno poudarja svoje stališče, da se nobena vojaška misija, v katero je vključena EU, ne bi smela začeti, preden o tem Evropski parlament ni ustrezno obveščen in z njim ni opravljeno posvetovanje;
Reaffirms its position that no military mission in which the EU is involved should start before the European Parliament has been appropriately informed and consulted;
zahteva, da se izdatki za vojaško opremo in oborožitev sprejmejo v proračunih, ki so pod parlamentarnim nadzorom; zato meni, da bi se bilo treba izogibati vzporednim proračunom in mehanizmom, ki jih ne morejo učinkovito nadzirati niti nacionalni parlamenti niti evropski parlament;
Demands that expenditure on military equipment and armaments be adopted in budgets which are subject to parliamentary control; is therefore of the opinion that parallel budgets and mechanisms, which cannot be effectively supervised either by national parliaments or by the European Parliament, should be avoided;
opaža, da proračun Evropske unije vsebuje različne postavke v zvezi z varnostnimi vidiki, kot so odobrena sredstva za krizna posredovanja, za varovanje zunanjih meja in bistvene infrastrukture, za varnostne raziskave in za izvedbo programov Galileo in Globalno spremljanje okolja in varnosti (GMES);
Notes that the European Union budget contains various headings with security aspects such as appropriations for crisis management, the security of external borders and vital infrastructures, security research and implementation of the Galileo and Global Monitoring for Environment and Security (GMES) programmes;
zahteva tudi, da se operacije vojaškega kriznega upravljanja financirajo iz proračuna Evropske unije in da za ta namen države članice zagotovijo dodatne vire EU;
Demands also that military crisis-management operations be financed from the EU budget and that, for that purpose, additional EU resources be made available by the Member States;
posledično poziva k uvedbi nove proračunske metodologije, da se poveča preglednost pri porabi proračunskih sredstev, namenjenih EVOP, in za podporo razvoju vojaških in civilnih zmogljivosti, potrebnih za izpolnjevanje ciljev EVS:
Consequently, calls for a new budgetary methodology to enhance transparency in ESDP spending and to support the development of the military and civilian capabilities needed to fulfil the aims of the ESS:
v začetni fazi, ki bi se morala začeti z letom 2007 in bi ne trajala več kot dve leti, bi Svet pripravil proračunski dokument, iz katerega bi bile razvidne zaveze držav članic za izpolnitev civilnega globalnega cilja 2008 in vojaškega globalnega cilja 2010 in ki bi temeljil na različnih obstoječih katalogih (katalog zahtev, katalog sil in katalog napredka);
in an initial phase, which should start in 2007 and not exceed two years in duration, the Council should draw up a budgetary document reflecting the commitments made by the Member States to fulfil the Civilian Headline Goal 2008 and the Military Headline Goal 2010 and based on the existing catalogues (requirements catalogue, force catalogue and progress catalogue);
v drugi fazi bi se morale države članice zavezati k EVOP prek navideznega "proračuna", v katerem bi na večletni osnovi zagotovile sredstva za financiranje opreme in osebja, potrebnega za operacije EVOP.
in a second phase, the Member States should commit themselves to the ESDP through a virtual 'budget' in which they would commit funds on a multi-annual basis to finance the equipment and personnel needed for ESDP operations.
Čeprav ta dokument ne bi bil pravno zavezujoč, bi vseeno postal pomemben politični dokument, takoj za proračunom EU, iz njega pa bi bile razvidne vsote, ki so jih države članice pripravljene porabiti za EVOP.
This document, whilst not legally binding, would nevertheless become an important political document next to the EU budget, and would indicate what the Member States are prepared to spend on the ESDP.
končni sklepi o racionalizaciji proračuna za SZVP in EVOP, vključno z računovodstvom za nacionalne odhodke na ravni EU na področjih varnosti in obrambe, bi morali biti del spremenjenega finančnega sistema EU, predvidenega za 2008-2009;
final decisions about the rationalisation of the budget for the CFSP and the ESDP, including the accounting of national expenditure at EU level in the security and defence dimension, should form a part of the revised financial system of the Union envisaged for 2008-09;
poudarja, da evropska varnostna strategija predpostavlja močno in neodvisno evropsko obrambno industrijo ter zmogljivosti za samostojne tehnološke raziskave in razvoj, ki bodo zmožne ustrezno zaščititi temeljne varnostne interese EU in držav članic; iz javne razprave sklepa, da moramo za pospeševanje konkurenčnosti evropske obrambne industrije in razvoj neodvisnega industrijskega temelja, ki zagotavljata potrebne obrambne zmogljivosti, sprejeti pravila notranjega trga za obrambne proizvode, prilagojena posebnostim tega sektorja; poudarja, da morajo taka pravila olajšati industrijsko sodelovanje in trgovanje znotraj Skupnosti; opozarja, da odstopanje v členu 296 Pogodbe ES ne spreminja dolžnosti institucij Skupnosti glede izdajanja zakonov o razvoju notranjega trga za obrambno opremo in storitve, če taka zakonodaja ščiti temeljne varnostne interese držav članic in EU; trdi, da je treba doseči visoko raven zaščite;
Emphasises that the ESS presupposes a strong and independent European defence industry and autonomous technology research and development capacities that are capable of adequately protecting the essential security interests of the EU and the Member States; concludes from the public debate that in order to foster the competitiveness of the European defence industry and develop an autonomous industrial base providing the necessary defence capabilities it is necessary to adopt internal market rules for defence-related products which are adapted to the specificities of this sector; underlines that such rules must facilitate industrial cooperation and trade within the Community; recalls that the derogation provided for in Article 296 of the EC Treaty leaves intact the duty of the Community institutions to legislate on the development of the internal market for defence-related equipment and services, provided such legislation protects the essential security interests of the Member States and of the EU; claims that a high level of protection needs to be achieved;
zato pričakuje sporočilo Komisije s pojasnili o uporabi člena 296, predlog Komisije o posebni direktivi o javnih naročilih za obrambo ter oblikovanje zavezujočega pravnega instrumenta o lažjem premeščanju obrambnih proizvodov znotraj Skupnosti, ki bo obstoječa nacionalna izvozna dovoljenja nadomestil s poenostavljenim enotnim sistemom; meni, da bi moral ta sistem zaščititi temeljne varnostne interese EU in držav članic s tem, da bi na podlagi pravil Evropske unije o ravnanju pri izvozu orožja opredelil načela evropske izvozne politike;
Looks forward therefore to the Commission's interpretative communication on the application of Article 296, to the Commission proposal for a specific directive on defence procurement, and to the creation of a binding legal instrument on the facilitation of intra-Community transfers of defence-related products that will substitute a simplified common system in place of the existing national export licences; holds that this system should protect the essential security interests of the EU and of the Member States by defining principles of a European export policy on the basis of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports;
opozarja, da pravila, kot je člen XXIII iz Sporazuma STO o vladnih naročilih, priznavajo možnost zaščite temeljnih varnostnih interesov, povezanih z javnimi naročili za obrambo; opozarja, da je treba za zagotovitev zaščite teh interesov EU in držav članic sprejeti skupna pravila, ki bi dajala prednost obrambnim proizvodom evropskega izvora pred tistimi iz tretjih držav, v celoti uveljavila načelo recipročnosti v trgovinskih odnosih in podpirala uporabo tehnologije, zaščitene s pravicami evropske industrijske lastnine;
Recalls that rules such as Article XXIII of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement recognise the possibility of protecting essential security interests related to defence procurement; emphasises that, in order to ensure the protection of those interests of the EU and of the Member States, the common rules to be adopted should grant preference to defence-related products of European origin over those originating from third countries, give full effect to the principle of reciprocity in trade relations, and favour the use of technology protected by European industrial property rights;
pozdravlja kodeks ravnanja pri javnih naročilih za obrambo, ki ga je pripravila Evropska obrambna agencija, in poziva vse države članice, naj ga sprejmejo; vztraja pri tem, da se odpravi prakso nadomestil in "pravičnega donosa na naložbe"; meni, da je treba v okviru EVOP povečati obseg dela Evropske obrambne agencije;
Welcomes the EDA's Code of Conduct on defence procurement and calls on all Member States to subscribe to it; insists that the practice of offsets and 'juste retour' should be abolished; considers it necessary that the work of the EDA be stepped up in the context of the ESDP;
priznava pomen kooperativnega raziskovanja za konkurenčnost evropske industrije; zato zahteva večje dopolnjevanje med delom Komisije in Evropske obrambne agencije z učinkovitejšim dialogom o civilnih, varnostnih in obrambnih raziskavah v Evropi; poudarja, da bi si morala EU postaviti za cilji in si prizadevati za zagotavljanje tehnologij z dvojno rabo in večnamenske zmogljivosti ter premagovanje delitve, ki ločuje raziskave za civilne in za obrambne namene; meni, da je treba, zaradi raznolikosti struktur podjetij v tem sektorju v primerjavi z drugimi področji raziskav, prilagoditi opredelitev malih in srednje velikih podjetij v domeni evropskih raziskav s področja varnosti;
Recognises the importance of cooperative research for the competitiveness of the European industry; demands, therefore, greater complementarities between the work of the Commission and the EDA, through more effective dialogue on civilian, security and defence-related research in Europe; emphasises that the provision of dual-use technologies and multifunctional capacities, and also overcoming the division separating research for civilian and defence purposes, should be aims and objectives of the EU; considers it necessary, given the diversity of company structures in this sector by comparison with other areas of research, to adjust the definition of small and medium-sized businesses in the area of European security research;
poziva, naj se Pravilom Evropske unije o ravnanju pri izvozu orožja iz leta 1998 podeli status zakona ter naj se v vseh državah članicah pravilno uporabljajo in izvajajo; meni, da bi bilo treba na skupni osnovi sprejemati vse odločitve glede tega, ali države prejemnice izpolnjujejo merila, ki so določena v pravilih;
Calls for the 1998 Code of Conduct on Arms Exports to be given the force of law and to be correctly applied and implemented in all Member States; is of the opinion that the decision as to which countries of destination meet the criteria of the Code of Conduct should be taken on a common basis;