natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Pridržek javnega reda je priznano pravno načelo v mednarodnem zasebnem pravu.
The public policy caveat is a recognised legal principle in IPL.
V odnosih med državami članicami bi moral spričo skupnih pravnih prepričanj in vrednot postati nepomemben.
In relations between the Member States, given their shared legal beliefs and values, it should no longer have significance.
Pomisleki, da se bodo pojavile nove možnosti za izogibanje pravu o nujnih deležih, so neutemeljeni.
Misgivings that there would be new ways and means of evading law on indefeasible interests are baseless.
Praktično vse države članice poznajo pravo o nujnih deležih, čeprav morda ne v isti obliki.
Law on indefeasible interests exists in virtually all Member States, albeit in differing forms.
Če je pokojnik izbral svoje domače pravo, ni nobenega razloga, da bi razmišljali o izogibanju.
If a testator opts for his or her home country's law, there is no reason even to consider the possibility of evasion.
Če bi pravico do izbire prava povezali z običajnim prebivališčem, bi bil to utemeljen pomislek.
If the choice-of-law right had been linked to habitual residence, that would have been a justifiable fear.
Po predlogu za državljana ni dovolj, da imajo običajno prebivališče v drugi državi članici, marveč mora imeti običajno prebivališče v tej državi ob smrti (ni pa nujno, da je tam tudi umrl).
Under this proposal, it would not be enough for individuals to take up habitual residence in another Member State; rather, they would have to have been habitually resident there at time of death (but would not have to have actually died there).
Nekoliko za lase privlečena se zdi domneva, da bi množica ljudi iz tega stališča spremenila svoje običajno prebivališče z namenom, da bi ga obdržali do svoje smrti.
It would appear somewhat far-fetched to assume that many people will transfer their residence on that basis with the intention of keeping it there until they die.
Posamezniki, ki se želijo na vsak način izogniti zakonu, bodo tudi v obstoječi ureditvi našli možnosti za to.
Individuals intent on evading the law at all costs will find ways and means of doing so under the legislation in force.
Priznavanje javnih listin
Recognition of authentic instruments
Poročevalec podpira priznavanje javnih listin v smislu njihovega prostega kroženja, priznanja njihove avtentičnosti in formalne moči dokazovanja.
The rapporteur is in favour of the recognition of authentic instruments in that they should freely circulate and there should be 'recognition' of their authenticity and formal evidentiary effect.
Beseda „priznavanje“ pa lahko pripelje do nesporazumov v nekaterih jezikih, saj ni sama po sebi umevna, temveč mora biti v nekaterih okoliščinah raztolmačena.
The term 'recognition' may lead to misunderstandings, however, since it is not self-evident, but, rather, would have to be interpreted on a case-by-case basis.
Evropsko potrdilo o dedovanju
European Certificate of Succession
Evropsko potrdilo o dedovanju bi se moralo omejiti na čezmejne zadeve.
The European Certificate of Succession should be restricted to cross-border matters.
Za izdajo bi moral biti pristojen vsak organ – sodišče, javni organi, notarji in drugi organi – ki se ukvarja z zapuščino.
Any entity dealing with an estate - courts, authorities, notaries, etc. - should be competent to issue it.
Te organe bi morala določiti država članica, katere pristojnost je utemeljena v skladu s poglavjem II.
Such entities should be determined by the Member State whose competence is established in accordance with Chapter II.
o poročilu o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010: Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU
on the EU Citizenship Report 2010: Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................30
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................32
IZID KONČNEGA GLASOVANJA V ODBORU...................................................................34
RESULT OF FINAL VOTE IN COMMITTEE.........................................................................36
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o posvetovanjih v Odboru za peticije,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions,
– ob upoštevanju pravice do peticije v skladu s členom 227 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to the right of petition enshrined in Article 227 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
– ob upoštevanju člena 20 PDEU, v katerem je opredeljen pojem državljanstva,
– having regard to Article 20 TFEU, which defines the concept of citizenship,
– ob upoštevanju drugega dela PDEU z naslovom Nediskriminacija in državljanstvo Unije, in Naslovov III in V Listine o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to Part Two of the TFEU, entitled Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union , and Titles III and V of the Charter of Fundamental Rights,
– ob upoštevanju člena 45 PDEU, ki zagotavlja prosto gibanje delavcev, kar vključuje odpravo vsakršne diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva delavcev držav članic EU v zvezi z zaposlitvijo, plačilom in drugimi delovnimi in zaposlitvenimi pogoji,
– having regard to Article 45 TFEU, under which guaranteed freedom of movement for EU workers entails the abolition of any discrimination based on nationality between workers of the Member States as regards employment, remuneration and other conditions of work and employment,
– ob upoštevanju členov 3, 10 in 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člena 8 PDEU,
– having regard to Articles 3, 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 8 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 27. oktobra 2010 z naslovom Poročilo o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010.
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘EU Citizenship Report 2010.
Odpravljanje ovir za pravice državljanov EU ( COM(2010)0603 ),
Dismantling the obstacles to EU citizens’ rights’ ( COM(2010)0603 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom K aktu za enotni trg – Za visokokonkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘Towards a Single Market Act – for a highly competitive social market economy’ ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic
– having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States
77. (v nadaljnjem besedilu direktiva o prostem gibanju in prebivanju),
77. (hereinafter ‘the FMD’),
UL L 255, 30.09.2005, str.
OJ L 255, 30.9.2005, p.
22. (v nadaljnjem besedilu direktiva o poklicnih kvalifikacijah),
22. (hereinafter ‘the Qualifications Directive’),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 987/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2004 o koordinaciji sistemov socialne varnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems
UL L 284, 30.10.2009, str.
OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p.
UL C 137E , 27.5.2010, str.
OJ C 137E, 27.5.2010, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 11. avgusta 2011 za sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z o evropskem letu državljanov (2013) ( COM(2011)0489 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal of 11 August 2011 for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Year of Citizens (2013) ( COM(2011)0489 ),
– ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa, ki državljana postavlja v središče evropskih politik na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice, s tem ko zagotavlja spoštovanje raznolikosti in varstvo najbolj ranljivih,
– having regard to the Stockholm Programme, which makes the citizen the focal point of European action on freedom, security and justice, guaranteeing respect for diversity and protection for the most vulnerable,
– ob upoštevanju člena 48. člena Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 48 of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker imajo državljani Unije – ne glede na njihovo morebitno invalidnost – med drugim pravico do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic, pravico voliti in biti voljen na volitvah v Evropski parlament in na občinskih volitvah v državi članici, kjer prebivajo, pravico do zaščite s strani diplomatskih in konzularnih organov druge države članice v tretjih državah ter pravico naslavljati peticije na Evropski parlament in obrniti se na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic kot tudi na institucije in posvetovalne organe Unije v katerem koli jeziku Pogodb
A. whereas Union citizens – regardless of their disabilities – have, inter alia, the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, the right to vote and to stand as candidates in elections to the European Parliament and in municipal elections in their Member State of residence, the right to the provision of consular protection by the diplomatic and consular authorities of another Member State in third countries, and the right to petition the European Parliament, to apply to the European Ombudsman, and to address the EU institutions and advisory bodies in any of the Treaty languages
Člen 20(2) PDEU. ;
Article 20(2) TFEU. ;
B. ker je Lizbonska pogodba okrepila in natančno opredelila koncept državljanstva EU – ki je bil prvič uveden z Maastrichtsko pogodbo – in pravice, ki izhajajo iz njega in se tudi izvajajo s sodno prakso, izboljšal se je status in podoba Evropske unije kot zagovornice pravic državljanov, zagotovljena so zakonodajna sredstva za spodbujanje dejavnega sodelovanja državljanov EU, določene ali spodbujene pa so tudi nove pravice, denimo evropska državljanska pobuda in pravice posameznika iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah; ker bi bilo treba državljanstvo EU razumeti kot vir pravic in dolžnosti;
B. whereas the Lisbon Treaty enhanced and detailed the concept of EU citizenship – first introduced under the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 – and the rights deriving therefrom, which are also driven by case-law, by reinforcing the status and image of the European Union as the defender of citizens’ rights, by providing legislative means to stimulate the active involvement of EU citizens and by creating or fostering new rights, such as the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) and the individual rights contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights; whereas EU citizenship should be seen as a source of both rights and duties;
C. ker to kaže na prizadevanje EU, da bi državljane postavila v središče svojih dejavnosti in oblikovala območje svobode, pravice in pravic za vse državljane EU;
C. whereas this demonstrates the EU’s efforts to make its citizens the central focus of its action and to work towards an area of freedom, justice and rights for all EU citizens;
D. pozdravlja sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije v zvezi z razlago člena 51 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti sodbo v zvezi z organizacijo The Equal Rights Trust, ki je poudarila, da morajo institucije držav članic prednostne temeljne pravice Unije upoštevati tudi, če želijo z nacionalnimi ukrepi omejiti temeljne svoboščine, ki jih zagotavlja PDEU;
D. welcoming the case-law of the European Court of Justice as regards the interpretation of Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular the ERT ruling, which emphasises that the institutions of the Member States are also bound by the overriding fundamental rights of the Union if they wish to use national measures to restrict the fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the TFEU;
E. ker je prosto gibanje del koncepta človekovih pravic in državljanstva Unije ter je ena od temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, ki so državljanom Unije priznane s Pogodbama;
E. whereas freedom of movement is inherent in the concepts of human rights and Union citizenship and represents one of the fundamental rights and freedoms of Union citizens recognised under the Treaties;
F. ker se sedem let po začetku veljavnosti direktive o prostem gibanju in prebivanju še vedno pojavlja preveč težav v zvezi z njenim izvajanjem; ker večina pritožb zadeva državljane EU, njihovo pravico do vstopa, pravico do prebivanja več kot tri mesece, veljavnost njihovih dovoljenj za prebivanje, ohranitev njihove pravice do prebivanja in stalnega prebivanja ter pravice njihovih družinskih članov;
F. whereas, seven years after the entry into force of the FMD, too many problems still persist in relation to its implementation; whereas most complaints focus on EU citizens, their right of entry, their right of residence for more than three months, the validity of residence permits, the retention of their right of residence and right of permanent residence and the rights of their family members;
G. ker mnogo državljanov ne more razpolagati z vsemi bistvenimi elementi svojih pravic, ki so zapisane v direktivi o prostem gibanju in prebivanju, zlasti pri uveljavljanju pravic družinskih članov, ki so državljani tretje države;
G. whereas many citizens do not possess all the relevant information concerning their rights championed by the FMD, in particular when seeking rights for family members who are third-country nationals;
H. ker morajo državljani EU, ki imajo običajno prebivališče v Združenem kraljestvu in ki zaprosijo za določene socialnovarstvene dajatve, opraviti tako imenovani preizkus za pridobitev pravice do prebivanja, ki uvaja dodatne pogoje za državljane, ki niso državljani Združenega kraljestva;
H. whereas EU citizens who are habitually resident in the United Kingdom and who apply for certain social security benefits are required to undergo the so-called ‘Right to Reside Test’, which imposes additional conditions on non-UK citizens;
I. ker je bilo vprašanje izgona Romov iz Francije leta 2010 sporno ne le z vidika temeljnih pravic, ampak tudi z vidika pravice do prostega gibanja in diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva ter rasne in etnične pripadnosti;
I. whereas the issue of the deportation of Roma people by France in 2010 was controversial not only from the fundamental rights perspective, but also from the standpoint of the right to free movement and that of discrimination on the grounds of nationality and racial and ethnic origin;
J. ker je Parlament 15. decembra 2011 sprejel resolucijo o prostem pretoku delavcev znotraj Evropske unije, v kateri poudarja pravice romunskih in bolgarskih delavcev na enotnem trgu
J. whereas on 15 December 2011 Parliament adopted a resolution on freedom of movement for workers within the European Union, with an emphasis on the rights of Romanian and Bulgarian workers in the single market
P7_TA(2011)0587 . ; ker je več držav članic sklenilo, da bodo uvedle ali še naprej izvajale prehodne ureditve, ki omejujejo dostop romunskih in bolgarskih državljanov do njihovega trga dela; ker lahko taki ukrepi povzročijo izkoriščanje delavcev in nezakonito delo ter preprečijo dostop do socialnovarstvenih dajatev;
P7_TA(2011)0587 . ; whereas several Member States have decided to introduce or to continue applying transitional arrangements which limit Romanian and Bulgarian nationals’ access to their labour markets; whereas such measures may lead to worker exploitation, illegal work and lack of access to social security benefits;
K. meni, da prosto gibanje ali prostovoljna mobilnost delavcev pogojujeta ali spodbujata uveljavljanje številnih pravic, ki jih državljanom podeljuje zakonodaja Unije; prav tako meni, da lahko olajševaje prostega gibanja poveča možnosti državljanov, da v celoti izkoristijo enotni trg, hkrati pa je lahko bistveno gonilo rasti;
K. whereas the exercise of a broad range of rights conferred on citizens by Union legislation is dependent on, or fostered by, the free movement or voluntary mobility of workers; whereas, accordingly, facilitating free movement can make it easier for citizens to take full advantage of the single market while also serving as a key driver of growth;
L. meni, da pravica do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic omogoča boljše razumevanje vrednosti evropskega povezovanja le, če jo spremljajo konkretni ukrepi, ki jih Unija in države članice sprejmejo na področju obveščanja, usposabljanja, priznavanja diplom, mobilnosti delavcev (med sezonskimi, čezmejnimi, napotenimi delavci, delavci, preseljenimi zaradi prenosa sedeža …);
L. whereas the right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States cannot make for a better understanding of the values of European integration unless it is accompanied by specific measures taken by the Union and the Member States in terms of information, training, recognition of qualifications, and worker mobility (among seasonal, cross-border and posted workers, workers transferred as a result of head office relocations, etc.);
M. ker je veliko število peticij razkrilo težave na področju dostopa do socialnovarstvenih dajatev, zlasti zaradi pomanjkanja sodelovanja med nacionalnimi organi, neustrezne uporabe načela seštevanja dajatev, ki se izplačujejo v več državah članicah (zlasti glede prenosljivosti pokojnin), neposredovanja ustreznih informacij o veljavnih pravilih ali zamudnih upravnih postopkov; ker sodba Sodišča EU z dne 21. julija 2011
M. whereas a large number of petitions revealed problems in the field of accessing social security benefits, mainly involving a lack of cooperation on the part of national authorities, incorrect application of the principle of aggregation of benefits payable in several Member States (in particular concerning portability of pensions), failure to provide correct information on the applicable rules or cumbersome administration of cases; whereas the ECJ judgment of 21 July 2011
Glej Lucy Stewart proti Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, zadeva C–503/09. potrjuje pravico državljanov EU, da se preselijo v drugo državo članico EU, ter pravico do socialnega varstva;
See Lucy Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Case C‑503/09. confirms the right of EU citizens to move to another EU Member State and be entitled to social security cover;
N. ker je bolonjski proces, ki posplošuje diplome kot dokazila o uspešno končanem univerzitetnem študiju, stopnja na poti k lažjemu priznavanju diplom;
N. whereas, under the Bologna Process, generally accepted diplomas for completion of university studies are being awarded as a step towards more straightforward recognition of qualifications;
O. ker je treba upoštevati težave, povezane z nepravilnim izvajanjem Direktive 2005/36/ES o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij
O. having regard to the problems linked to the incorrect implementation of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications
22. (izravnalni ukrepi, zahteve za predložitev dodatnih dokumentov, neutemeljene negativne odločbe države članice gostiteljice, nepotrebne zamude pri obdelavi prošenj, sistematično izvajanje posebnih jezikovnih preizkusov znanja), ki močno ovirajo uveljavljanje pravic državljanov po vsej EU in jim tako odvzemajo koristi socialne kohezije;
22. (compensatory measures, requests for additional documents, unsubstantiated negative decisions by the host Member State, undue delays in processing applications, systematic imposition of specific language tests), which constitute a significant obstacle to the exercise of citizens’ rights across the EU and thereby deprive them of the benefits of social cohesion;
P. ker so vlagatelji peticij nemški agenciji za zaščito otrok ( Jugendamt ) očitali diskriminacijo zoper nenemške zakonce v mešanih zakonskih zvezah; ker zaradi svojega neodvisnega delovanja Jugendamt v nekaterih primerih še povečuje težave, s katerimi se srečujejo razvezani tuji starši, ki želijo s svojimi otroki zapustiti nemško ozemlje;
P. whereas petitioners accuse the German Youth Welfare Office ( Jugendamt ) of discriminating against the non-German spouse in mixed marriages; whereas, on account of its operational independence, the Jugendamt contributes in some cases to the difficulties encountered by foreign divorced parents wishing to leave German territory with their children;
Q. ker je Parlament oktobra 2011 sprejel resolucijo
Q. whereas Parliament adopted a resolution
P7_TA(2011)0453 . o mobilnosti in vključevanju invalidov; ker veliko peticij vložijo invalidi, ki se vsak dan srečujejo z mnogimi ovirami, ki jim preprečujejo uživanje pravic državljanov EU, tj. z ovirami pri običajni uporabi izobraževalnega sistema in dostopu do zavarovanja ali infrastruktur javnega prevoza; ker EU potrebuje skladen sistem za ugotavljanje stopnje invalidnosti, saj brez njega lahko pogosto pride do nepravične obravnave in celo socialne izključenosti;
P7_TA(2011)0453 . in October 2011 regarding the mobility and integration of people with disabilities; whereas a considerable number of petitions are tabled by people with disabilities, who encounter on a daily basis many barriers preventing them from enjoying the rights of EU citizens, such as normal use of the education system and access to insurance or to public transport facilities; whereas there is a need for a coherent EU system for determining the degree of disability, and whereas the lack of such a system may lead to inequity and even social exclusion;
R. ker ima vsak državljan EU, ki je v sodnem postopku v neki državi članici, pravico, da za svojo obrambo dostopa do dokumentov, prevedenih v njegov materni jezik, in to zato, da bi se izognili vsakršni diskriminaciji na podlagi jezika ter predvsem da bi bil vsak državljan seznanjen s celotnim sodnim postopkom, ki poteka proti njemu, v sodno sprejemljivih rokih;
R. whereas all EU citizens brought before the courts of a Member State have the right of access, for their defence, to documents translated into their mother tongue, in order to prevent any discrimination based on language, and whereas, in particular, all citizens must be kept informed about any court proceedings against them, the entire process taking place within a judicially acceptable timeframe;
2. ugotavlja, da je pravica naslavljati peticije na Evropski parlament sicer izrecno določena v Pogodbah, vendar pa državljani o njej ne vedo dovolj ali je ne uveljavljajo, zato zahteva boljše, aktivno obveščanje državljanov – z utemeljitvami in pojasnili – o njihovi pravici do naslavljanja peticij v enem od uradnih jezikov Evropske unije; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj zato, da bi zajela čim več državljanov, o pravici do peticije okrepljeno obvešča prek svojih uradov v državah članicah, decentraliziranih informacijskih mrež, mreže nacionalnih varuhov človekovih pravic in vseh organizacij, ki sodelujejo s Komisijo in Parlamentom;
Notes that, although the right to petition the European Parliament is expressly provided for in the Treaties, it is not sufficiently well known or used, and therefore calls for improved, active communication to citizens – including justifications and explanations – about their right to petition in one of the official languages of the European Union; further calls on the Commission to join it in doing more to advertise the right to petition through their offices in the Member States, their decentralised information networks, the network of national Ombudsmen and all organisations working with the Commission and Parliament, in order to reach as many citizens as possible and to share best practices;