natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je FSAP prispeval k zapolnitvi veliko regulativnih vrzeli na področju finančnih storitev; prepričan pa je, da ima dodatno usklajevanje z uveljavljanjem pravil konkurence lahko multiplikativen učinek na splošno delovanje in učinkovitost ureditvenega okvira; poudarja, da bi morala nova zakonodaja v skladu s politiko konkurence zagotoviti poštene in konkurenčne razmere;
Believes that the FSAP has contributed to filling many regulatory gaps in the area of financial services; is convinced, however, that further coordination with competition rule enforcement could have a multiplicative effect on the overall functioning and efficiency of the regulatory framework; points out that new legislation should ensure a fair and competitive environment in line with competition policy;
seznanja se z vrsto novih dogajanj, ki predstavljajo morebitne prednosti in skrbi, vključno z inovativnimi tehnikami za zmanjšanje tveganja, znatnim povečanjem trga kreditnih izvedenih finančnih instrumentov, vse večjim sistemskim pomenom velikih vseevropskih finančnih skupin in povečano vlogo nebančnih finančnih ustanov, kot so hedge skladi ter zasebna kapitalska podjetja;
takes note of a range of new developments which present both potential strengths and possible concerns, including innovative risk mitigation techniques, the substantial growth of credit derivatives markets, the increased systemic importance of large pan-European financial groups, and the growing role of non-bank financial institutions such as hedge funds and private equity;
poudarja, da te tržne spremembe vplivajo tudi na naravo, vir in prenos sistemskega tveganja ter s tem na učinkovitost sedanjih sredstev za predhodno zmanjšanje tveganja; zato poziva k pregledni opredelitvi in oceni virov sistemskega tveganja ter v tem smislu osnovne dinamike finančnih kriz;
points out that those market changes also affect the nature, source and transfer of systemic risk, and thus the effectiveness of existing ex-ante risk mitigation tools; calls, therefore, for evidence-based identification and evaluation of the sources of systemic risks and the underlying dynamics of financial crises in this context;
pozdravlja odločitev Sveta za ekonomske in finančne zadeve, da izvede vajo za primer krize, s katero bo preizkusil ustreznost odziva bonitetnih nadzornih organov, finančnih ministrov in centralnih bank, ter spodbuja skupno delovno skupino, ustanovljeno kot nadaljnji ukrep, da oblikuje pogumne sklepe, tudi če so politično občutljivi;
appreciates the decision of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council to initiate a crisis exercise to test the appropriateness of the reaction of the prudential supervisors, the finance ministers, and the central banks, and encourages the joint working group set up as a follow-up, to draw courageous conclusions, even in the event that they are politically sensitive;
pozdravlja delo evropskih odborov regulativnih organov (CESR, Odbora evropskih bančnih nadzornikov (CEBS) ter Odbora evropskih nadzornikov za zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine (CEIOPS)) pri posvetovanju o trgih, svetovanju Komisiji in odborom Sveta na drugi stopnji ter zlasti napredku pri zbliževanju regulativnih in nadzornih praks, vendar brez prekoračenja njihovih pooblastil ali poskusa zamenjave zakonodajalcev; prepričan je, da je treba ta prizadevanja spodbujati ter ustrezno zaposliti in financirati te odbore za nalogo, ki so jo prevzeli;
Welcomes the work performed by the European committees of regulators (the CESR, the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), and the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS)) in consulting the markets, advising the Council and Commission Level 2 committees, and above all in progressing with convergence of regulatory and supervisory practices, without, however, overstepping their remit or attempting to replace the legislators; is convinced that that effort must be encouraged and those committees be adequately employed and resourced for the task which they have undertaken;
poziva odbore na tretji stopnji, naj izboljšajo medsektorsko usklajenost bonitetne ureditve in pravil nadzora nad skupino za velike finančne skupine, ki se ukvarjajo z enakimi ali podobnimi produkti, in po posvetovanju z udeleženci ustrezno svetujejo zakonodajalcem, da po potrebi ustrezno revidirajo pravila; poziva jih tudi, naj zagotovijo, da se bodo v vseh državah članicah vse finančne institucije nadzirale na enaki funkcionalni osnovi;
urges the three Level 3 committees to improve cross-sectoral consistency in prudential regulation and group supervision rules for large financial groups dealing with the same or similar products, and, following stakeholder consultation and due procedure give advice to the legislators as to where it is necessary to review the rules; urges them also to ensure that all financial institutions are equally supervised on a functional basis in all Member States;
poudarja pomen integriranega evropskega sistema za sodelovanje med nacionalnimi in sektorskimi nadzornimi organi, ki lahko zagotovi učinkovit nadzor nad velikimi finančnimi akterji in lokalnimi subjekti, ki so zakoreninjeni v nacionalne tradicije; poudarja, da morajo vsi nadzorniki ustrezno upoštevati tradicije izvajanja nadzora poslovanja na kraju samem; pozdravlja večje sodelovanje odborov na tretji stopnji CEBS, CESR ter CEIOPS ter dejstva, da sedaj izdajajo skupne letne delovne programe;.
Emphasises the importance of an integrated European system of cooperation between national and sectoral supervisors, capable of securing the efficient supervision of both big financial players and local entities rooted in national traditions; emphasises that all supervisors must take due account of those traditions in the way they execute their conduct of on-the-spot business supervision; welcomes the increasing cooperation of the Level 3 committees CEBS, CESR and CEIOPS and the fact that they now publish joint annual working programmes;
ugotavlja, da je za učinkovit pregled sistemskih in bonitetnih tveganj glavnih akterjev na trgu sedanji sistem sodelovanja treba sedanji sistem sodelovanja okrepiti na osnovi sistema sodelovanja, ki obstaja med nadzorniki, ter spodbuja večje usklajevanje, zlasti glede nadzora bonitetnih tveganj z več pristojnostmi, medsektorskih subjektov in finančnih konglomeratov; spodbuja sporazume in kodekse ravnanja med državami članicami in centralnimi bankami v zvezi s finančno podporo sistemu bonitetnega nadzora glede na obveznosti medsebojnega jamstva in refinanciranja, kjer sodeluje nekaj držav članic in več nadzornikov; ugotavlja, da je za presojo o tem, ali sedanji sistem zagotavlja resničen pregled sistemskih in bonitetnih tveganj glavnih akterjev na trgu, treba dati na voljo čas za pripravo relativno novih ureditev za drugo in tretjo stopnjo ter hkrati preučiti zaželenost in izvedljivost izvajanja bonitetnega nadzora na ravni EU, če bo v prihodnje to potrebno;
notes that, for effective oversight of the systemic and prudential risks of the top market players, the present system of cooperation may need to be strengthened on the basis of the system of cooperation that exists among supervisors, and encourages greater coordination, in particular with respect to prudential risk supervision of multi-jurisdictional and cross-sectoral entities and financial conglomerates; encourages agreements and codes of conduct between Member States and central banks on the financial backing of this system of prudential supervision, with respect to bail-out and lender-of-last-resort obligations where several Member States and more supervisors are involved; notes that, to judge whether the present system provides for a real oversight of the systemic and prudential risks of the top players in the market, it is necessary to give the relatively new Level 2 and Level 3 arrangements time to bed down and, at the same time, to look into the desirability and feasibility of EU-level execution of prudential supervision where needed in the future;
razume, zakaj države članice želijo, da se dovoli čas za uporabo novih ureditev in preskus pred upoštevanjem nadaljnjih korakov k približevanju; poudarja, da se lahko poveča pritisk za upoštevanje centralizirane ureditve nadzora, če ne bo doseženega napredka v tej smeri; zato v teh okoliščinah meni, da je še posebej pomembno tesnejše približevanje pri nadzoru in sodelovanju med domačimi nadzorniki in nadzorniki gostitelji;
Understands why Member States wish to allow new arrangements time to be implemented and tested before considering any further moves towards convergence; points out that, if progress is not made in this direction, pressure for consideration of a centralised supervisory arrangement may be increased; therefore advocates that, in these circumstances, closer convergence in supervision and cooperation between home and host supervisors within the existing structures becomes a matter of particular importance;
pozdravlja sodelovanje med nacionalnimi nadzornimi organi z namenom boljše uporabe sredstev za nadzor, razvijanjem nadzorne prakse in lajšanjem obremenitve, ki jo nadzor nalaga trgu; ima pozitivno mnenje o kolegiju nadzornih organov, ki obravnava finančne konglomerate z več pristojnostmi ter o operativnem projektu omrežja, ki ga je nedavno začel CEBS; poziva kolegij nadzornih organov, naj pospeši skupno evropsko kulturo nadzora in natančno opredeli, kje so meje takega prostovoljnega sodelovanja, ko se bodo pojavile resnične krizne razmere; ugotavlja pa, da tem kolegijem manjkajo nacionalni mandati za prenos pristojnosti, sprejemanje večinskih odločitev ali preprosto za vlaganje zadostnih sredstev ter strokovnega znanja in izkušenj v delo kolegija; zato poudarja, da je treba opredeliti okvir in nacionalne mandate za sodelovanje in pričakuje, da bo kolegij nadzornih organov in operativni projekt omrežja zagotovili potrebne praktične rešitve (memorandum o soglasju) za nadzor čezmejnih skupin v kratkem časovnem okviru;
Welcomes the cooperation among national supervisory authorities aimed at putting supervisory resources to better use, developing supervisory practice, and lightening the burden that supervision imposes on the market; is positive about colleges of supervisors dealing with multi-jurisdictional financial conglomerates, and about the operational networking project that CEBS has recently initiated; calls on the colleges of supervisors to foster a common European supervisory culture and to determine exactly where the limits of such voluntary cooperation lie when real crisis situations appear; notes, however, that these colleges lack the national mandates to transfer competences, to accept majority decisions, or simply to put sufficient resources and expertise into the colleges' work; points out, therefore, the necessity of defining a framework and national mandates for cooperation and expects the colleges of supervisors and the operational networking project to provide necessary practical solutions (memoranda of understanding) for the supervision of cross-border groups within a short time frame;
poudarja, da je domače sodelovanje pri nadzoru najpomembnejši sestavni del pri vzpostavljanju enotnega finančnega trga; ugotavlja zlasti, da je treba na področju nadzornih postopkov za odobritve združitve in prevzeme treba še veliko storiti za ustvarjanje učinkovito delujočih finančnih konglomeratov s širšo ekonomijo obsega; meni, da je treba upoštevati področje bančnega trga države, kjer ima sedež prevzeti finančni subjekt;
Emphasises that home-host supervisory cooperation is the most significant building- block in the set-up of the single financial market; notes in particular that, in the field of the supervisory approval process for mergers and acquisitions, there is much to do to facilitate the creation of efficiently functioning financial conglomerates with wider economies of scale; maintains that the banking market landscape of the country where the acquired financial entity is domiciled must be taken into due consideration;
meni, da je zaželena natančnejša porazdelitev vlog med Svetom, Komisijo in odbori na tretji stopnji; prav tako meni, da je za večji nadzor (zlasti v primerih jasne povezave z vprašanji konkurence) potrebna visoka raven neodvisnosti in nevtralnosti, ki ni najbolj združljiva s celotnim političnim profilom; poudarja, da bi bilo treba države članice spodbujati k združevanju pristojnosti nacionalnih nadzornikov, zlasti če zadevajo kazni; meni, da bi večje približevanje med nadzorniki olajšalo poslovanje podjetij, za katere sedaj velja več kot eden regulator; poudarja, da je največji izziv v smislu praktičnega sodelovanja pri odborih tretje stopnje; v ta namen predlaga vzpostavitev programov usposabljanja za nadzornike na finančnih trgih ter poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, v kakšnem obsegu se lahko za vso EU določijo standardi usposabljanja za nacionalne nadzornike ob upoštevanju in spodbujanju skupne evropske kulture nadzora;
considers that a more precise allocation of roles is desirable between the Council, the Commission, and the Level 3 committees; considers also that, for strong supervision, (particularly where there is a clear link to competition issues) a high level of independence and neutrality is required, which cannot be well combined with an overly political profile; emphasises that Member States should be encouraged to converge the powers of national supervisors, especially where penalties are concerned; considers that greater convergence among supervisors should facilitate the business of companies now subject to more than one regulator; highlights that the biggest challenge in terms of practical cooperation reside in the Level 3 committees; suggests the creation of training programmes for financial market supervisors to this effect and calls on the Commission to consider to what extent EU-wide standards could be laid down for the training of national supervisors in keeping with, and to promote, a common European supervision culture;
pozdravlja odločitev Sveta za ekonomske in finančne zadeve, naj v okviru Odbora za finančne storitve ustanovi podskupino za vprašanja dolgoročnega nadzorstva, katere poročilo je predvideno oktobra 2007; pričakuje, da bo ta skupina pripravila pošteno oceno sedanjih razmer; skupaj s končnim poročilom IIMG, ki se ga pričakuje jeseni 2007, poročilom Parlamenta in poročilom Komisije o spremljanju bo dana priložnost za oceno preostalih izzivov za vključitev in učinkovitost finančne ureditve in nadzorne strukture, ter zaveza za morebitna priporočila za nadaljnje korake;
welcomes the decision of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council to set up a Financial Services Committee subgroup on long-term supervisory issues, which is due to report in October 2007; expects that group to give a fair assessment of the present situation which, together with the final report of the IIMG that is also expected in autumn 2007, the report of Parliament and the expected follow-up report of the Commission, may create momentum for an assessment of the remaining challenges to the integration and effectiveness of the financial regulation and supervision architecture, and provide commitment for possible recommendations for further steps;
prepričan je, da lahko približevanje praks nadzora spodbudi pojav evropskega maloprodajnega finančnega trga;
Firmly believes that convergence of supervision practices could encourage the emergence of a European retail financial market;
poziva IIMG, naj upošteva širok vidik izzivov in priložnosti, s katerimi se sooča evropski sistem nadzora ter prispeva k dodatni razpravi pri končnih sklepih;
invites the IIMG to take a broad perspective on the challenges and opportunities facing the European system of supervision and to contribute to a further forward-looking debate in its final conclusions;
meni, da večje izenačenje Evropske unije z vodilnim položajem ZDA lahko, glede podrejenosti vrednostnim papirjem ZDA in menjalniškim provizijam, okrepi vpliv Evropske unije in držav članic v svetu; prepričan je, da bi bilo treba pojasniti model financiranja in okvir odgovornosti samoregulativnih organov, kot je Uprava za mednarodne računovodske standarde; prav tako upa, da bo Mednarodni denarni sklad ponovno pridobil položaj dejanske svetovne monetarne oblasti in akterja, ki preprečuje krize, zagotavlja finančno stabilnost in odpravlja svetovno neravnovesje;
believes that a greater counterbalance by the European Union to US leadership could reinforce the influence of the European Union and Member States globally as regards the authority of the US Securities and Exchange Commission; is convinced that the funding model and accountability framework of self-regulatory bodies such as the International Accounting Standards Board, should be clarified; hopes that it will also be possible to bring the International Monetary Fund back on track as a real global monetary authority and actor to prevent crises, guarantee financial stability, and restore global imbalances;
prepričan je, da bi bilo treba čezatlantsko partnerstvo razviti in okrepiti s spodbujanjem regulativnega usklajevanja; poudarja pomen izvajanja kapitalskega sporazuma Basel II s strani organov ZDA in medsebojno priznavanje računovodskih standardov s strani Komisije za vrednostne papirje ter poziva k večjemu sodelovanju med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami pri nadzoru naložbenih nosilcev z visoko stopnjo finančnih vzvodov, kot so hedge skladi, vključno z Mednarodnim druženjem nadzornikov trga vrednostnih papirjev in pristojnih organov in trgov, kjer se ti skladi običajno upoštevajo v dialogu med EU in ZDA; podpira pobudo nemškega predsedstva glede čezatlantskega gospodarskega sodelovanja z namenom pospeševanja čezatlantskega regulativnega usklajevanja in izogibanja nepotrebnega prekrivanja ter morebitnih neskladnosti pri uporabi pravil za subjekte finančnega trga;
Believes that the transatlantic partnership should be developed and strengthened by enhancing regulatory coordination; highlights the importance of the implementation of Basel II by the US authorities as well as mutual recognition of EU and US accounting standards, and calls for more democratically controlled cooperation between the European Union and the United States in monitoring the sector-specific work of regulators of alternative investment vehicles such as hedge funds, including with the International Organization of Securities Commissions and the competent authorities in markets where such funds are common and, as part of the EU-US dialogue; supports the Council Presidency's Transatlantic Economic Partnership initiative, which is aimed at fostering transatlantic regulatory coordination and averting needless overlapping, and possibly even inconsistencies, in the rules applying to financial market players;
meni, da so pri soočanju z nekaterimi novimi globalnimi izzivi in tveganji primerljivi regulativni odzivi na glavnih finančnih trgih ustrezni; zaveda se, da zakonodaja Skupnosti vpliva na odnose s tretjimi državami; poziva Komisijo, naj ohrani intenziven dialog in tehnično sodelovanje med Evropsko unijo in državami v razvoju za zagotavljanje učinkovitosti in kakovosti globalnega pravnega in regulativnega okvira finančnih storitev;
Believes that comparable regulatory responses in the main financial marketplaces are appropriate in the face of some new global challenges and risks; is aware that Community regulation has an impact on relations with third countries; urges the Commission to maintain intense dialogue and technical cooperation between the European Union and developing countries to ensure efficiency and quality of global legal and regulatory financial services frameworks;
opozarja na vodilno vlogo Evropske unije pri sedanjem delu projekta Solventnost II ter pričakuje, da bo ta vloga vplivala na svetovno regulativno strukturo in dejavnosti določanja standardov Mednarodne organizacije zavarovalnih nadzornikov;
points to the leading role of the European Union in the current work on the Solvency II framework, and expects that role to influence the global regulatory architecture and the standard-setting activities of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors;
meni, da bi morala imeti Evropska unija konstruktiven, dovzeten odnos do gospodarske rasti jugovzhodne Azije, zlasti Indije, Kitajske in Južne Koreje, ter se vzdrži določanja zaščitnih ukrepov na ravni Skupnosti in na nacionalni ravni; podpira pobude za oblikovanje skupnih globalnih standardov za finančne storitve, kot so na primer letna srečanja za okroglo mizo med EU in Kitajsko o finančnih storitvah in ureditvi;
Believes that the European Union should take a constructive, open-minded attitude to the economic rise of south-east Asia, and especially of India, China, and South Korea, and refrain from imposing any protectionist measures at Community or national level; supports initiatives to devise common global standards for financial services such as, for example, the annual meetings of the EU-China Round Table on Financial Services and Regulation;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. julija 2007 o posodabljanju delovnega prava za soočanje z izzivi 21. stoletja ( 2007/2023(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 11th July 2007 on modernising labour law to meet the challenges of the 21st century ( 2007/2023(INI) )
ob upoštevanju členov 136 do 145 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 136 to 145 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 15, 20 in 27 do 38 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije UL C 364, 18.12.2000, str.
having regard to Articles 15, 20 and 27 to 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union OJ C 364, 18.12.2000, p.
, zlasti pravice do varstva v primeru neupravičene odpustitve ter do poštenih in pravičnih delovnih pogojev,
, in particular the rights to protection in the event of unjustified dismissal and fair and just working conditions,
ob upoštevanju poročila skupine na visoki ravni o prihodnosti socialne politike v razširjeni Evropski uniji iz maja 2004,
having regard to the Report of the High Level Group on the future of social policy in an enlarged European Union of May 2004,
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta službe Komisije z naslovom "Lizbonski program Skupnosti: Poročilo o tehnični izvedbi 2006 in njegovo izvajanje" ( SEK(2006)1379 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working document entitled 'Community Lisbon Programme: Technical implementation report 2006' and its implementation ( SEC(2006)1379 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o socialni agendi ( KOM(2005)0033 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on the Social Agenda ( COM(2005)0033 ),
ob upoštevanju nacionalnih programov lizbonskih reform, ki so jih predložile države članice,
having regard to the national Lisbon reform programmes as presented by the Member States,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Globalna Evropa: konkurenca v svetu" ( KOM(2006)0567 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication entitled "Global Europe: competing in the world"( COM(2006)0567 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o integriranih smernicah za rast in delovna mesta (2005–2008) ( KOM(2005)0141 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs (2005-2008) ( COM(2005)0141 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva iz marca 2000, marca 2001, marca in oktobra 2005 ter marca 2006,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions of March 2000, March 2001, March and October 2005 and March 2006,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 1999/70/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o okvirnem sporazumu o delu za določen čas, sklenjenem med ETUC, UNICE in CEEP UL L 175, 10.7.1999, str.
having regard to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP OJ L 175, 10.7.1999, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. marca 2006 o demografskih izzivih in medgeneracijski solidarnosti UL C 292 E, 1.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 23 March 2006 on demographic challenges and solidarity between generations OJ C 292 E, 1.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2006 o uporabi Direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0463 .
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2006 on the application of Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0463 .