natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot primer težav in neenakopravne obravnave navajam slovenske narodne skupnosti v Italiji, Avstriji in na Madžarskem.
As an example of the difficulties and unequal treatment I would highlight the issue of the Slovene community in Italy, Austria and Hungary.
V Italiji so slovenski narodni skupnosti vzeli milijon evrov, v Avstriji so še vedno problematične dvojezične table, na Madžarskem pa je madžarska javna televizija sprejela odločitev, da za polovico zmanjša sredstva za edino televizijsko oddajo v slovenskem jeziku – Slovenski utrinki.
In Italy a million euros has been withdrawn from the funding for the Slovene community; in Austria bilingual place name signs are still a problem; and in Hungary the state broadcaster has adopted a decision to reduce by half the funding for ‘Slovenski utrinki’, the only TV programme in the Slovene language.
2009 je začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, v kateri je v 2. členu kot vrednota prvič omenjeno tudi varstvo pripadnikov manjšin, kar pomeni razčlenitev pravic in ne samo njihovo splošno varstvo.
Article 2 of that Treaty for the first time mentions the rights of persons belonging to minorities as a value, meaning not solely a general protection of rights but also that they are broken down.
(19. marec 2010)
(19 March 2010)
Spoštovanje pravic pripadnikov manjšin je ena izmed vrednot, na katerih temelji Evropska unija.
The respect for the rights of persons belonging to minorities is one of the values on which the European Union is founded.
Z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe je to izrecno navedeno v členu 2 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
With the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, this is explicitly mentioned in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.
Člen 21 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah izrecno prepoveduje vsako diskriminacijo na podlagi jezika ali pripadnosti narodni manjšini.
Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union prohibits explicitly any discrimination on grounds of language or of membership of a national minority.
Komisija bo v okviru svojega mandata zagotavljala spoštovanje teh temeljnih pravic v pravu EU in tudi njihovo izvajanje v državah članicah.
The Commission will ensure within the scope of its mandate that these fundamental rights are respected in EC law, including when Member States implement them.
V veljavi je obsežna zakonodaja in na voljo so številni programi, s katerimi lahko prispevamo k izboljšanju položaja pripadnikov manjšin.
There is a number of EU legislation and programmes which can contribute to improve the situation of persons belonging to minorities.
Komisija namerava te instrumente združiti, da bi tako lahko rešila nekatere težave, vključno z diskriminacijo, ki lahko vplivajo na pripadnike manjšin.
The Commission intends to combine these instruments to address certain difficulties, including discrimination, which are likely to affect persons belonging to minorities.
Veljavna protidiskriminacijska zakonodaja EU Direktiva Sveta 2000/43/ES z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost, UL L 180, 19.7.2000 , str.
The existing EU anti-discrimination legislation Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29.06.2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin, OJ L 180 (2000), p.
22, in Direktiva Sveta 2000/78/ES z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu, UL L 303, 2.12.2000 , str.
22 and Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27.11.2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, OJ L 303(200), p.
16. se bo še naprej uporabljala za zagotavljanje enakega obravnavanja pripadnikov manjšin.
16. will continue to be used to ensure the equal treatment of persons belonging to minorities.
Komisija je sprejela predlog nove direktive Predlog direktive Sveta o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na vero ali prepričanje, invalidnost, starost ali spolno usmerjenost z dne 2. julija 2008, COM(2008) 426 konč. , o katerem trenutno še potekajo razprave in s katerim bi varstvo pred diskriminacijo na podlagi vere ali prepričanja, invalidnosti, starosti ali spolne usmerjenosti razširili še na druga področja poleg področja zaposlovanja in dela.
The Commission has adopted a proposal for a new Directive Proposal for a Council Directive on implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation, of 2.07.2008, COM(2008)426 final. , currently under discussion, which would extend protection against discrimination on grounds of religion and belief, disability, age and sexual orientation to fields other than employment and occupation.
Namen Okvirnega Sklepa Sveta 2008/913/PNZ o boju proti nekaterim oblikam in izrazom rasizma in ksenofobije s kazenskopravnimi sredstvi Okvirni Sklep Sveta 2008/913/PNZ, UL L 328, 6.12.2008, str.
Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA on combating certain forms and expressions of racism and xenophobia by means of criminal law Council Framework Decision 2008/913/JHA, OJ L 328 of 6.12.2008, p.
55 . je zagotoviti, da se sovražni govor – na podlagi rase, barve kože, vere, porekla ali narodne ali etnične pripadnosti – in zločini iz sovraštva kaznujejo v vseh državah članicah.
55. aims to ensure that hate speech — on the grounds of race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin — and hate crimes are penalised in all Member States.
60 , ter Direktivo 2007/65/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. decembra 2007, UL L 332, 18.12.2007, str.
60, and Directive 2007/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2007, OJ L 332, 18.12.2007, p.
27 . prepovedan sovražni govor v avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah, saj je prepovedano vsako spodbujanje sovraštva zaradi rase, spola, veroizpovedi ali narodnosti.
27. bans hate speech in audiovisual media services by prohibiting any incitement to hatred based on grounds of race, sex, religion or nationality.
Komisijo pri nalogi izvrševanja ključno podpira Agencija za temeljne pravice, ki je odgovorna za zbiranje in analizo zanesljivih ter primerljivih podatkov o teh vprašanjih v državah članicah.
The Fundamental Rights Agency plays a key role in assisting the Commission in its enforcement task by collecting and analysing reliable and comparable data in the Member States about these issues.
Komisija želi opozoriti tudi na pomen Evropske listine o regionalnih in manjšinskih jezikih, ki jo je sprejel Svet Evrope, in Okvirne konvencije Sveta Evrope za varstvo narodnih manjšin.
The Commission would also like to recall the importance of the Council of Europe's Charter for Regional or Minority Languages and the framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor P-5038/2010
Question for written answer P-5038/2010
(29. junij 2010)
(29 June 2010)
Zadeva: Sporazum o prosti trgovini med Evropsko unijo in Korejo
Subject: EU free trade agreement (FTA) with Korea
V združenih zadevah 21 do 24/72 in zadevi 104/81 je Evropsko sodišče odločilo, da se mednarodni trgovinski sporazumi Unije neposredno uporabljajo, če: (a)
In Joined cases 21 to 24/72 and Case 104/81 the European Court of Justice held that the EU’s international trade agreements are directly effective if they: (a)
so zavezujoči za Skupnost, (b)
are legally binding on the Community, (b)
podeljujejo pravice posameznikom, (c)
confer rights on individuals, (c)
so jasni, natančni in brezpogojni in (d)
are clear, precise and unconditional, and (d)
vsebujejo pravni mehanizem za izvrševanje sporazuma, ki ni podvržen političnemu manevriranju in je enako zavezujoč za vse podpisnice.
contain a legal mechanism for enforcement of the FTA, that is not subject to political manoeuvring and is equally binding on all signatory parties.
Glede na izjavo Komisije na predstavitvi parlamentarnega odbora INTA o sporazumu o prosti trgovini med Unijo in Korejo 23. junija 2010, češ da sporazum vsebuje pravno zavezujoča načela, in ob upoštevanju, da določbe sporazuma izpolnjujejo merila (a), (b) in (c), prosimo, če Komisija lahko odgovori na naslednja vprašanja: 1.
Given the Commission’s statement during Parliament’s INTA Committee Hearing on the EU FTA with Korea on 23 June 2010 that there are legally binding principles in the agreement, and given the fact that the provisions of the FTA satisfy criteria (a), (b) and (c) mentioned above, could the Commission please answer the following: 1.
Ali je pravni mehanizem v sporazumu o prosti trgovini dovolj trden za to, da se bo sporazum med EU in Korejo lahko uporabljal neposredno? 2.
Is the legal mechanism enshrined in the FTA sufficiently firm for the EU FTA with Korea to be directly effective? 2.
Če je, ali se bodo neposredno uporabljale tudi določbe v zvezi z delom v sporazumu?
If so, does the direct effect encompass provisions on labour issues in the FTA?
De Guchta v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr De Gucht on behalf of the Commission
(30. julij 2010)
(30 July 2010)
Po sprejetju bo Sporazum o prosti trgovini med EU in Korejo v skladu z mednarodnim pravom zavezujoč za Evropsko unijo in njene države članice ter Južno Korejo.
The EU‑Korea FTA will, once approved, be binding on the European Union and its Member States and South Korea as a matter of international law.
Določbe Sporazuma se lahko izvršujejo z določbami o reševanju sporov (glej poglavje 14 Sporazuma), ki omogočajo učinkovito obravnavo sporov.
The provisions of the agreement can be enforced via the dispute settlement provisions of the agreement (see Chapter 14), which are designed to permit the efficient processing of disputes.
Poglavje 14 se ne uporablja za poglavje o trajnostnem razvoju, ki vsebuje določbe s področja dela in varstva okolja, za katerega velja poseben podroben mehanizem za posvetovanje in izvrševanje določb.
Chapter 14 does not apply to the sustainable development chapter that includes provisions on labour and environmental issues, which is subject to a separate detailed mechanism for consultations and enforcement.
Ta mehanizem vzpostavlja trden okvir za sodelovanje in dialog, ki vključuje civilno družbo, tj. družbe, sindikate in okoljske nevladne organizacije, da pregledajo izvajanje Sporazuma o prosti trgovini.
This mechanism establishes a strong framework for cooperation and dialogue which includes the involvement of civil society, such as business, trade unions and environmental non-governmental organisations, to review the implementation by the FTA.
Komisija namerava v celoti uporabiti instrumente iz Sporazuma med EU in Korejo ter se zavzeti za okrepljeno reševanje vprašanj s področja dela in varstva okolja skupaj s Korejo.
The Commission intends to make full use of the instruments provided by the EU‑Korea agreement and thus allows for strengthened engagement with Korea on labour and environment issues.
Sporazum ne omenja neposrednega učinka.
The agreement is silent on the issue of direct effect.
Če v Sporazumu ni drugače določeno, se vprašanje neposrednega učinka Sporazuma obravnava na ravni zakonodaje Unije ali Koreje.
Unless stated in the agreement, the issue of direct effect of the agreement is a matter for Union or Korean law.
To lahko pomeni, da se Sporazum neposredno uporablja v Uniji, ne more pa se neposredno uporabljati v Koreji, ali obratno.
This may mean that the agreement could be directly effective in the Union and not directly effective in Korea, or vice versa.
Glede Unije je Komisija predlagala, da sklepa o podpisu in sklenitvi Sporazuma vsebujeta naslednjo klavzulo v zvezi s tem vprašanjem:
As regards the Union, the Commission has proposed that the decisions signing and concluding the Agreement contain a clause dealing with this issue, which states:
„Ta sporazum se ne razlaga tako, kot da podeljuje pravice ali uvaja obveznosti, na katere se je možno neposredno sklicevati pred sodišči Evropske unije ali držav članic.“
‘This Agreement shall not be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations which can be directly invoked in European Union or Member State courts’.
Ta klavzula je v členu 8 predloga Komisije za sklep o podpisu Sporazuma COM(2010) 136 konč. in členu 7 predloga Komisije za sklep o sklenitvi Sporazuma COM(2010) 137 konč. .
This clause is Article 8 of the Commission's proposal for the decision on signature COM(2010)136 final. and Article 7 of the Commission's proposal for the decision on conclusion COM(2010)137 final. .
Če bosta sklepa s tema členoma sprejeta, se Sporazum v Uniji ne bo neposredno uporabljal.
If the decisions are adopted with these Articles, the agreement will not be directly effective in the Union.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor P-5333/2010
Question for written answer P-5333/2010
(7. julij 2010)
(7 July 2010)
Zadeva: Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvena sporazuma s Hrvaško in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo: dostop do trga dela za zakonca in otroke delavca, ki je zakonito zaposlen na ozemlju države članice
Subject: SAAs with Croatia and FYROM: access to labour market for legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State
Ob upoštevanju pogojev in postopkov, ki se uporabljajo v posamezni državi članici: —
Subject to the conditions and modalities applicable in each Member State: —
zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, z izjemo sezonskih delavcev in delavcev, ki prihajajo na delo v državo na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov v smislu člena 46, razen če v takšnih sporazumih ni drugače predvideno, imajo dostop do trga dela te države članice v času, ko ima ta delavec dovoljenje za bivanje zaradi dela v tej državi .“
the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State, with the exception of seasonal workers and of workers coming under bilateral agreements within the meaning of Article 46, unless otherwise provided by such agreements, shall have access to the labour market of that Member State, during the period of that worker's authorised stay of employment . ’
Ob upoštevanju razlage besedne zveze „dostop do trga dela“ v notranji zakonodaji EU, naj bi to pomenilo, da delovno dovoljenje ni potrebno.
Given the interpretation of the term ‘access to the labour market’ in internal EU legislation, it is understood to mean that no work permits are necessary.
V tem kontekstu člen 45(1)(b), katerega vsebina je jasna, natančna in se torej najverjetneje lahko neposredno uporablja, omogoča sklep, da zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, z izjemo sezonskih delavcev in delavcev, ki prihajajo na delo v državo na podlagi dvostranskih sporazumov v skladu s členom 46, razen če ni v takšnih sporazumih predvideno drugače, imajo dostop do trga dela te države članice in jim v tej državi ni treba pridobiti delovnega dovoljenja.
In this context Article 45(1)(b),being clear, precise and therefore most likely directly applicable, would entail that the legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State, with the exception of seasonal workers and of workers coming under bilateral agreements within the meaning of Article 46, unless otherwise provided by such agreements, would have access to the labour market of that Member State and should not be obliged to acquire work permits in Member States.
Vendar člen 45(1) določa, da za pravice zakonca in otrok delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, veljajo pogoji in postopki, ki se uporabljajo v posamezni državi članici.
However, 45(1) implies that the rights of a legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State are subject to the conditions and modalities applicable in each Member State.
Iz tega razloga se zdita navedeni določbi istega člena protislovni.
Therefore the two provisions of the same article seemingly have contradictory meanings.
Če se sprejeme razlaga, da člen 45(1) določa, da lahko države članice za zgoraj navedene osebe uporabijo postopke za izdajo delovnih dovoljenj, se s tem razveljavi pravica, navedena v členu 45(1)(b).
If Article 45(1) is accepted to mean that Member States have the right to apply work permit procedures to the abovementioned persons, this would invalidate the right given in Article 45(1)(b).
Ali lahko Komisija natančneje razloži, katere so pravice in omejitve, ki jih določa navedeni člen, v kontekstu delovnih dovoljenj?
Could the Commission give a more precise explanation of the rights and limitations of the article in question in the context of work permits?
Če je ključno določilo „ob upoštevanju pogojev in postopkov, ki se uporabljajo v posamezni državi članici“, kakšna je potemtakem dejanska vrednost, namen in pravica, ki izhaja iz člena 45(1)(b) in ki je zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, ki tam zakonito prebivajo, ne bi imeli, če člen 45(1)(b) ne bi obstajal?
If the qualifier (‘subject to the conditions and modalities applicable in each Member State’) is decisive, what is then the real value and purpose and the actual right stemming from Article 45(1)(b) which a legally resident spouse and children of a worker legally employed in the territory of a Member State would not have in the absence of Article 45(1)(b)?
Odgovor komisarja Füleja v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Füle on behalf of the Commission
(25. avgust 2010)
(25 August 2010)
V nasprotju z zakonodajo Skupnosti zakonec in otroci delavca, zakonito zaposlenega na ozemlju države članice, na podlagi člena 45(1) stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenih sporazumov s Hrvaško in Nekdanjo jugoslovansko republiko Makedonijo nimajo neomejene pravice dostopa do trga dela zadevne države članice v času, ko ima ta delavec dovoljenje za bivanje zaradi dela v tej državi.
Under Article 45(1) of the Stabilisation and Association Agreements with Croatia and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, unlike under EC law, the spouse and children of a worker legally employed in a Member State do not enjoy an absolute right to have access to its labour market during the period of the worker's authorised stay of employment.
Države članice lahko za pridobitev te pravice opredelijo izpolnjevanje določenih pogojev, iz katerih bi na prvi pogled lahko izhajala obveznost vložitve vloge za delovno dovoljenje.
Member States may make this right subject to certain ‘conditions and modalities’ that could prima facie result in an obligation to apply for a work permit.
Vendar ti pogoji ne smejo nikoli povzročiti neupravičenega omejevanja pravic, ki jih določa člen 45(1) stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma.
However, these conditions and modalities may never result in unjustified curtailment of the rights conferred by Article 45(1) of the Stabilisation and Association Agreement.
Kljub temu želi Komisija člana parlamenta opozoriti na dejstvo, da lahko verodostojno razlago teh pravil poda samo Sodišče Evropske unije.
The Commission would nevertheless draw the Honourable Member’s attention to the fact that only the Court of Justice of the European Union is entitled to give these rules an authentic interpretation.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor P-9667/2010
Question for written answer P-9667/2010
Zadeva: Izlitje strupenega rdečega blata na Madžarskem: čezmejne posledice
Subject: Toxic red sludge spill in Hungary: cross-border effects
Četrtega oktobra 2010 je na Madžarskem prišlo do katastrofalne nesreče, saj je pri tovarni aluminija popustila stena zadrževalnika, iz katerega se je razlilo več kot milijon kubičnih metrov strupenega rdečega blata.
A disastrous accident occurred in Hungary on 4 October 2010 when a deluge of over a million cubic metres of toxic red sludge was released after the collapse of the containing wall of a reservoir in which it was being stored at an aluminium plant.
Onesnaženje, ki ga je povzročila ta industrijska nesreča, predstavlja resno in morebiti tudi čezmejno grožnjo za zdravje in okolje v Evropski uniji.
The pollution from that industrial accident poses a serious and potentially cross-border threat to health and the environment in the European Union.
Na podlagi izjave komisarke Georgieve v Parlamentu 21. oktobra 2010 so bila najhuje poškodovana naselja, kmetijska zemljišča in ekosistemi v neposredni bližini nesreče.
According to the statement by Commissioner Georgieva to Parliament on 21 October 2010, the most severe damage was in the immediate vicinity of the accident, to human settlements, agricultural land and ecosystems.
Prizadetih je bilo sedem tisoč prebivalcev, devet jih je umrlo in 130 jih je bilo poškodovanih, od tega 35 tistih, ki so se prvi odzvali.
Seven thousand inhabitants have been affected, nine people have died and 130 have been injured, about 35 of them first responders.
Nesreča je prizadela približno 1 000 hektarjev kmetijskih zemljišč in štiri območja Natura 2000, poleg tega pa je prišlo tudi do precejšnje škode za živalstvo in rastlinstvo na tem območju.
Approximately 1 000 hectares of agricultural land and four Natura 2000 sites have been affected and there has been substantial damage to flora and fauna in the area.
Vzroke in možne posledice zaenkrat raziskujejo madžarski organi oblasti.
So far, investigation into the causes and possible effects has been conducted by the Hungarian authorities.
Nesreča ni le resno poškodovala občutljivega ravnovesja v madžarskem ekosistemu, temveč ima lahko tudi čezmejne posledice in bi lahko ogrozila celotna stanovanjska naselja v sosednjih državah, ki lahko bila kontaminirana s sproščenimi snovmi.
The disaster has not only severely damaged the delicate ecosystem balance in Hungary, but may also have cross-border effects and could potentially threaten entire residential areas in neighbouring countries which may be contaminated by the substances released.
Ob upoštevanju zgornjih ugotovitev in glede na možno uvedbo pravočasnih ukrepov v državah, ki mejijo na Madžarsko, sprašujemo: —
In view of the above, and in the light of the possible introduction of timely measures in Hungary’s neighbouring countries: —
Ali ima Komisija informacije o morebitnih čezmejnih posledicah nesreče? —
Does the Commission have information on the possible cross-border effects of the accident? —
Ali Komisija načrtuje pripravo študije o čezmejni grožnji onesnaženja, ki je posledica nesreče, za prebivalstvo?
Does the Commission plan to prepare a study on the cross-border contamination threat to the population as a result of the accident?
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor P-001660/2011
Question for written answer P-001660/2011
(1. marec 2011)
(1 March 2011)
Predlog direktive Sveta o ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki (KOM 2010/618) je pripravljen z namenom vzpostavitve pravnega okvirja EU za ravnanje z izrabljenimi gorivi in radioaktivnimi odpadki in zagotovitve primernih nacionalnih ukrepov za visoko stopnjo varnosti za zaščito delavcev in širše javnosti pred nevarnostjo sevanja.
The proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (COM(2010)618) has been drafted with a view to establishing an EU legal framework for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and ensuring that appropriate national measures are put in place to guarantee a high level of safety to protect workers and the general public from radiation risks.
Ali bo Svet EU v postopku sprejemanja direktive upošteval mnenje Evropskega parlamenta?
Therefore, as the rapporteur for this document, I would like to ask whether the Council will take account of Parliament’s opinion in the procedure for the adoption of this directive.