natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da morajo vse evropske politične stranke spoštovati najvišja merila notranje demokracije (z demokratično izvolitvijo organov stranke in z demokratičnim odločanjem, vključno z izbiro kandidatov);
Emphasises the need for all European political parties to conform to the highest standards of internal party democracy (as regards the democratic election of party bodies and democratic decision-making processes, including for the selection of candidates);
meni, da ko stranka izpolni pogoje za priznanje statusa politične stranke na ravni EU, lahko prejme finančna sredstva le, če je v Evropskem parlamentu zastopana vsaj z enim svojim članom;
Takes the view that, once it has met the conditions for being regarded as a political party at EU level, a party may receive funding only if it is represented in the European Parliament by at least one of its members;
poudarja, da imajo politične stranke pravice, dolžnosti in odgovornosti ter bi zato morale slediti združljivim organizacijskim vzorcem; meni, da je tako organizacijsko zbliževanje mogoče doseči le z določitvijo skupnega, na pravu EU temelječega pravnega in fiskalnega statusa za evropske politične stranke in njihove politične fundacije;
Points out that political parties have rights, obligations and responsibilities and should therefore follow converging general organisational patterns; considers that this organisational convergence can only be achieved by establishing a common legal and fiscal status based on EU law for the European political parties and their political foundations;
je prepričan, da bi zanesljiv pravni status evropskih političnih strank ter lastna pravna osebnost, ki bi temeljila neposredno na pravu Evropske unije, evropskim političnim strankam in njihovim političnim fundacijam omogočila, da delujejo kot predstavnice evropskega javnega interesa;
Is convinced that authentic legal status for the European political parties and a legal personality of their own, based directly on the law of the European Union, will enable the European political parties and their political foundations to act as representative agents of the European public interest;
meni, da bi evropske politične stranke morale vzajemno delovati in tekmovati glede zadev, povezanih s skupnimi evropskimi izzivi ter Evropsko unijo in njenim razvojem na treh ravneh: regionalno, nacionalno in na evropski ravni; meni, da je za evropske politične stranke izjemno pomembno, da so učinkovite in produktivne na ravni EU, na nacionalni ravni in širše;
Takes the view that the European political parties should interact and compete on matters relating to common European challenges and the European Union and its development at three levels: regionally, nationally and at European level; considers that it is of the utmost importance for European political parties to be efficient and productive at EU and national level and beyond;
poudarja pomemben izziv v zvezi z organizacijsko zmogljivostjo, s katerim se bodo morale soočiti evropske politične stranke v luči reform, ki lahko spremenijo evropski volilni sistem (vzpostavitev dodatne volilne enote in nadnacionalnih list);
Stresses the important challenges in terms of organisational capacity that the European political parties will have to face in the light of the reforms that may be made to the European electoral system (creation of an additional constituency, establishment of transnational lists), ;
ugotavlja, da je to načeloma v skladu z zamislijo o evropskih političnih strankah, ki sodelujejo pri referendumskih kampanjah, ko so ti referendumi neposredno povezani z vprašanji v zvezi z Evropsko unijo;
Notes that this is, in principle, in keeping with the idea of European political parties participating in referendum campaigns, when the referendums concerned are directly linked to issues relating to the European Union;
se je zato odločil, da bo pozval Komisijo, naj predlaga osnutek statuta evropskih političnih strank v skladu s členom 225 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Decides, therefore, to request the Commission to propose a draft statute for European political parties in accordance with Article 225 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
ugotavlja, da je s kratkoročnega vidika treba izboljšati ureditveno okolje evropskih političnih strank in fundacij, kar bi kot prvi korak vključevalo sprejetje evropskega statuta;
Notes that what is needed on a shorter-term basis is an improved regulatory environment for the European political parties and foundations, involving, as a first step, the adoption of the European statute;
Dodatni predlogi za reformo
Additional reform proposals
meni, da bi bilo treba v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem ustanovitvenih pogojev upoštevati poslance regionalnih parlamentov ali skupščin le, če ima tak parlament ali skupščina zakonodajno oblast;
Considers that Members sitting in regional parliaments or assemblies should be taken into account in connection with the fulfilment of the funding conditions only if the parliament or assembly in question is endowed with legislative powers;
poudarja, da sta dodelitev sredstev in zaprtje računov evropskih političnih strank in fundacij birokratska in nadležna postopka; meni, da to v veliki meri izvira iz dejstva, da se financiranje šteje kot donacijo po Finančni uredbi, kar je primerno za financiranje projektov ali združenj, ne pa za stranke;
Points out that the award of funding and the closure of the accounts of the European political parties and foundations are bureaucratic and cumbersome procedures; considers that this stems to a great extent from the fact that funding payments are regarded as ‘grants’ within the meaning of the Financial Regulation, which is appropriate for the funding of projects or associations, but not for parties;
zato meni, da bi Komisija morala predlagati, da se v Finančni uredbi doda nov naslov, ki bi bil posvečen izključno financiranju evropskih strank in fundacij in bi bil temu prilagojen; meni, da bi se morala uredba o financiranju kar zadeva izvrševanje sklicevati na določbe takega novega naslova;
Takes the view, therefore, that the Commission should propose the creation of a new title in the Financial Regulation devoted solely and tailored specifically to the funding of European parties and foundations; considers that the Funding Regulation should, as far as its implementation is concerned, refer to the provisions of this new title;
poudarja, da je samofinanciranje strank in fundacij znak vitalnosti; meni, da bi ga bilo treba spodbuditi s povišanjem veljavne omejitve za donacije z 12.000 EUR letno na 25.000 EUR letno na donatorja, v povezavi z zahtevo, da se v trenutku prejema donacije razkrije istovetnost donatorja, v skladu z veljavno zakonodajo in v prid preglednosti;
Stresses that the self-financing of parties and foundations is a sign of vitality; believes that it should be encouraged by raising the present limit of EUR 12 000 per year for donations to EUR 25 000 per year/per donor, combined, however, with a requirement to disclose the donor's identity at the time of receipt, in accordance with the legislation in force and in the interests of transparency;
meni, da je zahteva po predložitvi letnih delovnih programov kot pogoj za financiranje za politične stranke neprimerna; še več, poudarja, da take zahteve ni v nobeni državi članici EU;
Considers that requiring the submission of ‘annual work programmes’ as a precondition for funding is inappropriate for political parties; points out, moreover, that such a requirement does not exist in any EU Member State;
poudarja dejstvo, da mora biti financiranje, če želi izpolniti svoj namen, pravočasno; poziva k izjemi od pravil za izvajanje finančne uredbe, in sicer, naj bo 100% in ne le 80% sredstev na voljo na začetku finančnega leta; meni, da je ob upoštevanju pozitivnih preteklih izkušenj tveganje za Parlament neznatno;
Underlines the fact that the timing of funding is crucial if it is to fulfil its purpose; calls, as an exception to the implementing rules for the Financial Regulation, for the funding to be made available at the beginning of the financial year at 100 %, not 80 %; considers that in view of positive past experiences the risk to Parliament is negligible;
poudarja, da finančna uredba določa, da se z donacijo „ne smejo financirati celotni poslovni izdatki upravičenca“; ugotavlja, da je spoštovanje tega pravila posebej težko za fundacije in da vodi k dvoumnemu računovodstvu (denimo „prispevki v naravi“); poudarja, da skoraj noben od sistemov financiranja v državah članicah ne zahteva delnega samofinanciranja, saj to lahko manjše ali nedavno ustanovljene stranke postavlja v slabši položaj;
Points out that the Financial Regulation stipulates that grants ‘may not finance the entire operating expenditure of the beneficiary body’; observes that complying with this rule is especially difficult for foundations and leads to evasive bookkeeping techniques (for example ‘contributions in kind’); points out that almost none of the funding schemes in Member States require partial self-financing, as this can disadvantage smaller or recently established parties;
poudarja, da bi bilo mogoče neodvisne vire, ki jih morajo evropske politične stranke dokazati, zmanjšati na 10% njihovega proračuna, da bi dodatno spodbudili njihov razvoj; istočasno poudarja, da lastni viri v obliki materialnih virov ne bi smeli presegati 7,5 % njihovega proračuna;
Points out that the independent resources that the European political parties are required to demonstrate could be reduced to 10 % of their total budget, in order to further enhance their development; at the same time, believes that their own resources in the form of physical resources should not exceed 7.5 % of their total budget;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba v primeru evropskih političnih fundacij izkoristiti revizijo pravnega instrumenta kot priložnost, da se odpravi zahteva, da dokažejo, da imajo lastne vire;
Notes that in the case of European political foundations the revision of the legal instrument should be taken as an opportunity to abolish the requirement to demonstrate that they have resources of their own;
poudarja, da je treba v okviru te revizije odpraviti omejitev za evropske politične fundacije, na podlagi katere smejo svoja sredstva uporabljati le v Evropski uniji; tako bi fundacijam omogočili, da igrajo vlogo tako v EU kot zunaj nje;
Points out that in the context of this revision the limitation imposed on European political foundations requiring them to use their funds within the European Union should be removed; thereby enabling the foundations to play a role both inside and outside the EU;
vendar poudarja, da bi bilo treba sproščanje sistema financiranja uravnotežiti z določitvijo sankcij v uredbi o financiranju, kjer jih trenutno ni; te sankcije bi lahko bile v obliki finančnih kazni v primeru kršitev določb denimo o preglednosti donacij; poudarja, da je treba določiti enake pogoje za kopičenje rezerv iz lastnih sredstev nad predpisano omejitvijo in prenos sredstev tako za evropske politične stranke kot za z njimi povezane evropske politične fundacije;
Emphasises, however, that relaxing the funding regime would have to be counterbalanced by providing for sanctions in the Funding Regulation where they are currently lacking; these sanctions could take the form of financial penalties in the event of infringements of the rules concerning, for example, the transparency of donations; emphasises the need to lay down the same conditions governing the building-up of reserves from own resources above the limit and the carrying-over of funds for both European political parties and their affiliated European political foundations;
izpostavlja, da lahko od leta 2008 evropske politične stranke uporabijo sredstva, ki jih dobijo kot donacije, za „financiranje kampanj ...v okviru volitev v Evropski parlament“ (člen 8, tretji odstavek uredbe o financiranju); nadalje pa poudarja, da teh zneskov ne smejo uporabiti za financiranje referendumskih kampanj; vseeno meni, da če naj imajo evropske politične stranke politično vlogo na ravni EU, bi morale imeti pravico, da sodelujejo pri teh kampanjah, če ima predmet referenduma neposredno zvezo z zadevami Evropske unije;
Points out that since 2008 European political parties have been entitled to use sums received as grants for ‘financing campaigns conducted ... in the context of the elections to the European Parliament’ (Article 8, third paragraph, of the Funding Regulation); also points out, however, that they are prohibited from using these sums for financing ‘referendum campaigns’; believes, however, that if European political parties are to play a political role at EU level, they should have the right to participate in such campaigns as long as the subject of the referendum has a direct link with issues concerning the European Union;
poziva evropske politične stranke, naj začnejo postopek za preučitev pogojev za neposredno individualno članstvo ter ustrezne ureditve za neposredno ali posredno sodelovanje posameznikov pri notranjih dejavnostih in postopkih odločanja strank;
Invites the European political parties to start a process of considering the terms for direct individual membership and appropriate arrangements for individuals' direct or indirect participation in the internal activities and decision-making processes of the parties;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. aprila 2011 o upravljanju in partnerstvu na enotnem trgu ( 2010/2289(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 6 April 2011 on Governance and Partnership in the Single Market ( 2010/2289(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „K aktu za enotni trg – Za visoko konkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo: 50 predlogov za izboljšanje skupnega dela, poslovanja in izmenjav“ ( KOM(2010)0608 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act for a highly competitive social market economy: 50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another’ ( COM(2010)0608 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast' ( KOM(2010)2020 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Europe 2020 – a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Enotni trg za Evropo 21. stoletja“ ( KOM(2007)0724 ) in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije, ki je priložen temu sporočilu „Enotni trg: pregled dosežkov“ ( SEK(2007)1521 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A single market for 21st century Europe’ ( COM(2007)0724 ) and the accompanying Commission staff working document ‘The Single Market: review of achievements’ ( SEC(2007)1521 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2007 o pregledu enotnega trga UL C 187 E, 27.7.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2007 on the Single Market review OJ C 187 E, 27.7.2008, p.
in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije „Pregled enotnega trga: eno leto kasneje“ ( SEK(2008)3064 ),
and the Commission staff working document ‘The Single Market review: one year on’ ( SEC(2008)3064 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Pametna pravna ureditev v Evropski uniji“ KOM(2010)0543 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘Smart Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2010)0543 ),
ob upoštevanju 27. letnega poročila sporočila Komisije o spremljanju uporabe zakonodaje EU in delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o stanju v različnih sektorjih, ki je priložen temu poročilu ( SEK(2008)1143 ),
having regard to the Commission's 27th Annual Report on Monitoring the Application of EU Law and to the accompanying Commission staff working document entitled ‘Situation in the different sectors’ ( SEC(2010)1143 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Komisije z 29. junija 2009 o ukrepih za izboljšanje delovanja enotnega trga (C(2009)4728),
having regard to the Commission Recommendation of 29 June 2009 on measures to improve the functioning of the single market (C(2009)4728),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 10. decembra 2010 o aktu za enotni trg,
having regard to the Council Conclusions of 10 December 2010 on the Single Market Act,
ob upoštevanju poročila o ponovni oživitvi enotnega trga, ki ga je za Komisijo pripravil profesor Mario Monti,
having regard to Professor Mario Monti's report to the Commission on revitalising the single market,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. maja 2010 o uresničitvi enotnega trga za potrošnike in državljane Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0186 .
having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on delivering a single market to consumers and citizens Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0186 .
ob upoštevanju pregleda stanja notranjega trga št. 21 (2010) in svojih resolucij z dne 9. marca 2010 UL 349 E, 22.12.2010, str.
having regard to the Internal Market Scoreboard No 21 (2010), and to its resolutions of 9 March 2010 OJ C 349 E, 22.12.2010, p.
in 23. septembra 2008 UL C 8 E, 14.1.2010, str.
and 23 September 2008 OJ C 8 E, 14.1.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Evropa rezultatov – Uporaba prava Skupnosti“ ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on ‘A Europe of Results - Applying Community Law’ ( COM(2007)0502 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 258 in 260 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Articles 258 to 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju členov 7, 10 in 15 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 7, 10 and 15 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0083/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0083/2011 ),
ker je treba pri posvetovanju in pogovorih s Komisijo in strokovnimi skupinami zagotoviti učinkovito zastopanost civilne družbe ter malih in srednjih podjetij, da bi pridobili dejavno podporo vseh interesnih skupin;
whereas in order to gain the active support of all stakeholders, it is essential that during consultations and dialogue with the Commission, as well as in expert groups, effective representation of civil society and SMEs is ensured,
ker je za uspešen ponovni zagon enotnega trga zlasti pomembno ustrezno širjenje, priprava in vodenje različnih posvetovanj in poročil institucij EU (EU 2010, poročilo o državljanstvu za leto 2010, Celovita industrijska politika, Digitalna agenda za Evropo, Montijevo poročilo, resolucija Parlamenta o uresničitvi enotnega trga za potrošnike in državljane, Gonzalesovo poročilo in poročilo odbora IMCO itd.);
whereas the proper dissemination, articulation and management of the various EU Institutions' consultations and reports (EU 2010, the Citizenship Report 2010, the Integrated Industrial Policy, the Digital Agenda for Europe, the Monti report, Parliament's Resolution on ‘delivering a Single Market to consumers and citizens’, the Gonzales and IMCO reports, etc.) are of particular importance for the successful relaunch of the Single Market,
ker je med pravili enotnega trga in koristmi, ki jih ta pravila v praksi prinašajo državljanom in podjetjem, še vedno velika vrzel,
whereas a substantial gap still persists between the single market rules and the benefits that citizens and businesses can draw from them in practice,
ker stopnja nedoseganja prenosa direktiv v EU znaša 1,7 %, če upoštevamo primere, v katerih prenos direktive preseže določen rok, Komisija pa že začne postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev,
whereas the EU's average transposition deficit amounts to 1.7% when taking into account the cases in which the transposition time of a directive exceeds the deadline and in which infringement proceedings for non-conformity have been initiated by the Commission,
z zanimanjem pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o aktu za enotni trg, zlasti tretje poglavje, in splošni pristop, ki ga Komisija predlaga z namenom, da bi vzpostavila uravnoteženost enotnega trga med podjetji in državljani ter izboljšala demokracijo in preglednost procesa odločanja; poudarja, da s tem pristopom skuša zagotoviti optimalno uravnoteženost predlogov iz treh delov sporočila;
Welcomes with interest the Commission Communication ‘Towards a Single Market Act’, especially its third chapter and the global approach which it proposes in order to rebalance the single market between enterprises and citizens and to improve the democracy and transparency of the decision-making process; stresses that this approach seeks to guarantee the best balance between the proposals in the three parts of the communication;
meni, da so vsa tri poglavja sporočila enako pomembna in medsebojno povezana in da bi jih morali dosledno obravnavati, pri čemer ne bi smeli medsebojno ločevati različnih pomembnih vprašanj;
Considers that the three chapters of the Communication are equally important and interconnected, and should be dealt with in a consistent approach without isolating the different issues at stake from each other;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj okrepita celovit pristop k ponovnemu zagonu enotnega trga z vključevanjem prednostnih nalog v zvezi z enotnim trgom v vsa politična področja, ki so odločilna za oblikovanje enotnega trga v korist evropskih državljanov, potrošnikov in podjetij;
Urges the Commission and the Council to reinforce the holistic approach to relaunching the Single Market, mainstreaming Single Market priorities to all policy areas which are crucial to achieving the Single Market for the benefit of European citizens, consumers and businesses;
meni, da so okrepitev evropskega gospodarskega upravljanja, izvajanje strategije EU 2020 in ponovni zagon enotnega trga enako pomembni za oživitev evropskega gospodarstva in bi jih morali skupaj obravnavati;
Believes that enhancement of European economic governance, implementation of the EU 2020 strategy and the relaunch of the Single Market are equally important for revitalising the European economy and should be seen in combination;
meni, da je treba dokončno oblikovati konkurenčen enotni trg brez ovir, da bi zagotovili konkretne prednosti delavcem, študentom, upokojencem in državljanom na splošno, ter podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednjim podjetjem, v njihovem vsakdanjem življenju;
Considers that a barrier-free and competitive single market should be completed in order to bring concrete advantages for workers, students, pensioners and citizens in general, and for businesses, particularly SMEs, in their daily lives;
poziva Komisijo, naj navede predvideni časovni razpored za izvedbo akta za enotni trg in naj redno objavlja doseženi napredek, zato da bo evropske državljane bolje obveščala o uresničevanju enotnega trga in da bodo seznanjeni z njegovimi koristmi;
Calls on the Commission to indicate the implementation timetable for the Single Market Act and to publish regular updates of tangible progress in order to make the EU public more aware of the Act's implementation and highlight its benefits;
je prepričan, da je eden od glavnih izzivov ponovnega zagona enotnega trga zagotovitev političnega vodstva, predanosti in usklajevanja; meni, da je celovito vodenje z najvišje politične ravni bistveno za ponovni zagon enotnega trga;
Is convinced that one of the main challenges in relaunching the Single Market is ensuring political leadership, commitment and coordination; believes that comprehensive guidance from the highest political level is crucial for the relaunch of the Single Market;