natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja dejstvo, da bodo sporazumi o trgovini z bananami pomenili dokončne zaveze EU glede dostopa na trg za banane in bodo vključeni v končne rezultate naslednjih uspešno zaključenih večstranskih pogajanj v okviru WTO o dostopu kmetijskih pridelkov na trg (krog iz Dohe);
Welcomes the fact that the Agreements on Trade in Bananas will constitute the EU's final market-access commitments for bananas and will be included in the final results of the next round of multilateral market-access negotiations for agricultural products to be successfully concluded under WTO auspices (Doha Round);
poudarja, da doseženi sporazum sicer predstavlja napredek v krogu pogajanj iz Dohe, vendar omejen, saj so ugotovljene težave veliko obširnejše narave kot same banane;
Stresses that the deal reached represents a step forward in the Doha Round talks, but only a limited one, given that the difficulties encountered go well beyond the simple issue of bananas;
poudarja, da bodo ob potrditvi Ženevskega sporazuma o trgovini z bananami nerešeni spori in vse pritožbe, ki so jih do 15. decembra 2009 predložili posamezno ali skupno vsi dobavitelji banan iz držav Latinske Amerike z največjimi ugodnostmi glede na trgovinski režim EU za banane, obravnavani kot poravnani;
Stresses that, upon certification of the Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas, all pending disputes and all claims filed before 15 December 2009 by any Latin American MFN banana supplier with respect to the EU trading regime for bananas will be deemed to have been settled;
ugotavlja, da zneski v letu 2010 kažejo stabilne oziroma nekoliko povečane cene banan za potrošnike EU;
Notes that the figures for 2010 show that banana prices for EU consumers remained stable or increased only slightly;
poudarja, da bodo sporazumi o trgovini z bananami omogočali, da bo sektor banan izključen iz pogajalskega kroga v Dohi o tropskih pridelkih; medtem ko bo za tropske pridelke veljalo veliko znižanje tarif, poudarja, da bodo znižanja tarif za „pridelke z ukinjenimi preferenciali“ v interesu držav AKP izvedena v relativno daljšem obdobju kot predvideva splošna formula, ki se je uporabljala pri pogajanjih; vendar poudarja, da sporazumi o trgovini z bananami ne morejo zajamčiti sprejemljivega sporazuma za države AKP o tropskih pridelkih in zmanjševanju prednostne obravnave, saj so nekatera velika gospodarstva v vzponu že zavrnila predloge, oblikovane v času sporazumov o trgovini z bananami, kot so pokazali odzivi Indije in Pakistana med sejo generalnega sveta WTO decembra 2009;
Stresses that the Agreements on Trade in Bananas will make it possible to decouple the banana sector from the Doha Round negotiations on ‘tropical products’; stresses that whilst ‘tropical products’ will be subject to deeper tariff cuts, tariff cuts on ‘preference erosion products’ of interest to ACP countries will be implemented over a relatively longer period than will be the case under the general formula applied in the negotiations; stresses, nevertheless, that the Agreements on Trade in Bananas are not likely to pave the way for an agreement acceptable to the ACP countries on tropical products and the erosion of their preferential treatment, since the proposals formulated at the time of the Agreements on Trade in Bananas have already been rejected by some large emerging economies, as demonstrated by the reactions of India and Pakistan at the meeting of the WTO General Council in December 2009;
poudarja, da je EU bananam iz držav AKP vedno podelila posebne tarifne preferenciale; opozarja, da so nekatere članice WTO večkrat oporekale glede skladnosti preferencialne obravnave s pravili WTO; poudarja, da so številne sodne odločitve sosvetov za reševanje sporov WTO, pritožbenega organa in posebnih razsodnikov zahtevale spremembo veljavnega režima;
Points out that the EU has traditionally granted special tariff preferences to bananas from ACP countries; recalls that some WTO members have repeatedly challenged the compatibility of this preferential treatment with WTO rules; stresses that a series of legal rulings by WTO dispute panels, the Appellate Body and special arbitrators have called for a change to the existing regime;
obžaluje, da se pri pogajanjih o večstranskem sporazumu z andskimi državami ni ohranil prvotni regionalni pristop, kar postavlja Ekvador v položaj, v katerem ne koristi enakih tarif kot Kolumbija in Peru;
Views with regret the fact that the original regional approach could not be retained in the negotiations on the Multi-Party Agreement with the Andean countries, which left Ecuador in the position of not benefiting from the same tariffs as Colombia and Peru;
poudarja, da so zaradi sedanjih sporazumov od leta 2008 banane iz držav AKP imele dostop v EU brez dajatev in kvot;
Emphasises that, since 2008, bananas from ACP countries have entered the EU duty- and quota-free, thanks to the current agreements;
poudarja, da bodo vzporedni pogovori z državami AKP vodili k dogovoru, da bodo poleg redne pomoči EU glavne izvoznice banan AKP prejele dodatno pomoč s pomočjo novega programa spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane (BAM); poudarja, da bi bila finančna ureditev za spremljevalne ukrepe za banane lahko nezadostna v smislu sredstev in prekratka v smislu obdobja za izvajanje, da bi lahko učinkovito pomagala pridelovalcem banan iz držav AKP, da se prilagodijo učinkom sprememb v uvoznem režimu EU; poziva Komisijo, naj jasno navede, da je finančna ureditev dodatni denar poleg sedanjih sredstev za sodelovanje ter da ni le prispevek k nacionalnim proračunom, ki ne more biti namenjen za določene programe, kot sta izobraževanje in diverzifikacija; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži novo večletno finančno ureditev;
Stresses that the parallel discussions with the ACP countries produced an agreement to the effect that, in addition to regular EU aid, the main ACP banana-exporting countries will receive extra support through a new programme – the so-called ‘Banana Accompanying Measures’ (BAM); stresses that the BAM financing arrangement could be insufficient in terms of resources and too short in terms of its implementing period to provide effective help to ACP banana producers in adapting to the effects of the changes in the EU's import regime; asks the Commission to indicate clearly that the financing arrangement consists of money additional to current development cooperation funds and that it is not just a contribution to national budgets which cannot be earmarked for specific programmes, such as education and diversification; asks the Commission to present a new multiannual financing arrangement;
poziva Komisijo, naj 18 mesecev pred iztekom programa izvede oceno programa spremljevalnih ukrepov glede banan, vključno s priporočili o sprejetju dodatnih ukrepov in njihovi vrsti.
Calls on the Commission to conduct an assessment of the BAM 18 months before the programme's expiry, including recommendations on any further measures to be taken and the nature thereof;
odločno zavrača vse poskuse financiranja programa za države AKP, ki pridelujejo banane, s prerazporeditvijo sredstev iz proračunskih vrstic za razvojno sodelovanje;
Firmly rejects any attempts to finance the programme for ACP banana-producing countries by redeploying appropriations from the budget lines for development cooperation;
poudarja, da bo pomembno porazdeliti sredstva iz spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane po državah na podlagi njihovih predvidenih izgub glede izvoza banan in pridelave v skladu z ravnijo razvoja države, preizkušenih kazalnikov in obsega trgovine z bananami z EU; poudarja, da je treba poiskati pravilno ravnotežje med tremi oblikami morebitnih ne medsebojno izključujočih ukrepov: tistih, ki bi izboljšali učinkovitost sedanje pridelave, tistih, ki bi povečali lokalno dodano vrednost, in tistih, ki bi državam pomagali pri preusmeritvi od pridelave banan;
Points out that it will be important to allocate the resources from the BAM to countries on the basis of their expected losses in terms of banana exports and production and their level of development, weighted indicators and the volume of their trade in bananas with the EU; stresses the need to strike the right balance between three types of non-mutually exclusive measure that can be taken: those to improve the efficiency of existing production, those to increase the value added locally, and those to help countries diversify away from banana production;
poziva EU in države AKP, naj predlagajo ukrepe za pomoč državam, ki so močno odvisne od pridelave banan, da diverzificirajo svoja gospodarstva, vključno z obsežnejšo pomočjo za trgovino;
Calls on the EU and the ACP States to bring forward measures to help heavily banana-dependent States to diversify their economies, including in the form of more Aid for Trade;
poudarja, da so banane eden izmed glavnih kmetijskih pridelkov nekaterih najbolj oddaljenih regij Unije, zlasti francoskih čezmorskih departmajev Guadeloupe in Martinika, Azorov, Madeire in Kanarskih otokov;
Emphasises that bananas are one of the main agricultural crops of some outermost regions of the Union, in particular the French overseas departments of Guadeloupe and Martinique, the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands;
priporoča, da se upošteva družbeno-gospodarski pomen sektorja banan v najbolj oddaljenih regijah EU ter njegov prispevek k doseganju cilja socialne in gospodarske kohezije s pomočjo ustvarjenih delovnih mest, dohodka, gospodarskih dejavnosti, ter vpliva, ki ga ima na vzdrževanje okoljskega in krajinskega ravnovesja, kar spodbuja razvoj turizma;
Recommends that due account should be taken of the socioeconomic importance of the banana sector to the outermost regions of the EU and the contribution it makes to achieving social and economic cohesion, on account of the income and employment which it generates, the economic activities to which it gives rise, and the effect which it has of maintaining an environmental and landscape balance which encourages the development of tourism;
ugotavlja, da je bil leta 2006 sprejet program POSEI zaradi evropske tarife za dostop na trg, dogovorjene v WTO, v višini 176 EUR/tono, kar pomeni, da tarifa iz sporazumov WTO o trgovini z bananami še ni bila upoštevana pri proračunu za POSEI; spodbuja zadevne organe EU, naj prilagodijo podporo za domače pridelovalce EU, ki je vključena v proračun programa POSEI, in sprejmejo druge ukrepe za zagotovitev, da bodo ob tendenci liberalizacije svetovne trgovine banan evropski pridelovalci lahko ostali na trgu in nadaljevali svoje tradicionalne dejavnosti;
Notes that the POSEI support programme was adopted in 2006 in the light of the agreed WTO European market-access tariff of €176/tonne, which means that the tariff laid down in the WTO Agreements on Trade in Bananas has not yet been taken into account in the POSEI budget; encourages the relevant EU authorities to adjust the support package for domestic EU producers included in the POSEI budget and to take other steps in order to ensure that, in the face of the trend towards the liberalisation of the global trade in bananas, domestic EU producers are able to remain on the market and pursue their traditional activities;
meni, da bi sporazumi o trgovini z bananami lahko znatno vplivali na pridelovalce iz držav AKP ter EU in njenih najbolj oddaljenih regij; zato poziva Komisijo, naj poveča podporo zanje ter jo po potrebi podaljša do leta 2020;
Considers that producers from ACP countries and from the EU and its outermost regions could be significantly affected by the Agreements on Trade in Bananas; calls on the Commission therefore to increase support for them and extend that support to 2020 if necessary;
opaža, da je pridelava banan v najbolj oddaljenih regijah EU v skladu z višjimi socialnimi in okoljskimi standardi v primerjavi z večino držav Latinske Amerike; opozarja, da so v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije količine aktivnih snovi, kot so pesticidi, 20 do 40-krat manjše od uporabljenih v pridelavi v Južni in Srednji Ameriki; prav tako pa se na fitosanitarnem področju večina aktivnih snovi, ki so z evropskimi pravili za varnost hrane prepovedana, obsežno uporabljajo na plantažah v Južni in Srednji Ameriki;
Notes that banana production in the EU's outermost regions (ORs) meets higher social and environmental standards than is the case in most Latin American countries; draws attention to the fact that in the ORs the use of active agents, such as pesticides, is 20 to 40 times lower than in South and Central American countries, whilst in the phytosanitary field most of the active agents banned under European food safety rules are widely used throughout South and Central American plantations;
ugotavlja, da se je v najnovejših dvostranskih sporazumih EU s pridelovalci banan (večstranski trgovinski sporazum s Kolumbijo in Perujem ter pridružitveni sporazum s Srednjo Ameriko) EU strinjala, da bo do 1. januarja 2020 postopno zmanjšala svoje uvozne tarife za banane, ki izhajajo iz teh držav, na 75 EUR/tono;
Notes that, in its most recent bilateral agreements involving banana producers (the Multi-Party Trade Agreement with Colombia and Peru and the Association Agreement with Central America), the EU has agreed progressively to reduce its import tariff on bananas originating in those countries to €75/tonne by 1 January 2020;
ugotavlja, da bo preferencialno razmerje 39 EUR/tono, ki ga bodo zagotovili sporazumi o trgovini z bananami, znatno izboljšalo konkurenčnost na trgu EU za druge izvoznike osmih andskih in srednjeameriških držav ter nadnacionalnih podjetij, ki delujejo v regiji; poudarja, da bodo od leta 2020 dalje koristi teh držav, ki že izvažajo banane v EU, znatne, saj se bodo tako izvozi kot cene, za katere prodajajo svoje banane, povečali;
Notes that the €39/tonne preferential margin ultimately granted by the Agreements on Trade in Bananas will significantly improve the competitiveness on the EU market vis-à-vis other exporters of the eight Andean and Central American countries concerned and of transnational companies operating in that region; stresses that from 2020 onwards the benefits for those countries already exporting bananas to the EU will be conspicuous, as both their exports and the price they are paid for their bananas will increase;
poudarja, da bi drugi izvozniki v EU, ki so obravnavani po načelu največjih ugodnosti, (daleč najpomembnejši je Ekvador), kot tudi države AKP in najmanj razvite države, glede na države podpisnice sporazuma o trgovini z bananami, lahko izkusili padec konkurenčnosti na trgu EU;
Stresses that other MFN exporters to the EU (the most important, by far, being Ecuador), ACP countries and least-developed countries could experience a decline in their relative competitiveness on the EU market with respect to the signatories of the Agreements on Trade in Bananas;
meni, da mora biti dostop na trg EU dovoljen le pridelovalcem, ki spoštujejo agendo za dostojno delo Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO), človekove pravice in okoljska pravila;
Considers that access to the EU market should be granted only to producers who respect the ILO's decent labour agenda and human rights and observe environmental rules;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter Brazilije, Kolumbije, Kostarike, Ekvadorja, Gvatemale, Hondurasa, Mehike, Nikaragve, Paname, Peruja in Venezuele, Združenim državam ter državam AKP.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela, the United States and the ACP countries.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (07782/2010),
having regard to the draft Council decision (07782/2010),
ob upoštevanju Ženevskega sporazum o trgovini z bananami (07968/2010) in osnutka sporazuma o trgovini z bananami med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike (07970/2010),
having regard to the draft Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas (07968/2010) and the draft Agreement on trade in bananas between the European Union and the United States of America (07970/2010),
ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s prvim pododstavkom člena 207(4) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0148/2010 ),
having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0148/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A7-0002/2011 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A7-0002/2011 ),
odobri sklenitev sporazumov;
Consents to conclusion of the agreements;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to stališče posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter Brazilije, Kolumbije, Kostarike, Ekvadorja, Gvatemale, Hondurasa, Mehike, Nikaragve, Paname, Peruja in Venezuele ter Združenih držav Amerike.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Brazil, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru and Venezuela and the United States of America.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2011 o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1964/2005 o tarifnih stopnjah za banane ( KOM(2010)0096 – C7-0074/2010 – 2010/0056(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 February 2011 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1964/2005 on the tariff rates for bananas ( COM(2010)0096 – C7-0074/2010 – 2010/0056(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0096 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0096 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0074/2010 ),
having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0074/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0003/2011 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0003/2011 ),
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Uredbi (EU) št. 306/2011.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EU) No 306/2011.)
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2011 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (OEEO) (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0810 – C6-0472/2008 – 2008/0241(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 February 2011 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) (recast) ( COM(2008)0810 – C6-0472/2008 – 2008/0241(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0810 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0810 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0472/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0472/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 294(3) in člena 192(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to Article 294(3) and Article 192(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 11. junija 2009 UL C 306, 16.12.2009, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 11 June 2009 OJ C 306, 16.12.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 3. aprila 2009, naslovljenega na Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane v skladu s členom 87(3) Poslovnika,
having regard to the letter of 3 April 2009 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0229/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0229/2010 ),
ker po mnenju posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem opredeljene kot take, in ker je predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov in omenjene spremembe, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb,
whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance,
sprejme v nadaljevanju podano mnenje iz prve obravnave ob upoštevanju priporočil posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts the position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 192(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192(1) thereof,
v skladu z rednim zakonodajnim postopkom Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 3. februarja 2011.
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure Position of the European Parliament of 3 February 2011.
Potrebne so številne bistvene spremembe Direktive 2002/96/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 27. januarja 2003 o odpadni električni in elektronski opremi (OEEO) UL L 37, 13.2.2003, str.
A number of substantial changes are to be made to Directive 2002/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) OJ L 37, 13.2.2003, p.
Cilji okoljske politike Unije so zlasti ohranitev, varstvo in izboljšanje kakovosti okolja, varovanje zdravja ljudi ter preudarno in racionalno izkoriščanje naravnih virov.
The objectives of the Union's environment policy are, in particular, to preserve, protect and improve the quality of the environment, protect human health and utilise natural resources prudently and rationally.
Navedena politika temelji na previdnostnem načelu, na načelu preventivnega ukrepanja in na načelu, da naj se poškodba okolja prednostno odpravi pri viru, kot tudi na načelu plača povzročitelj obremenitve.
That policy is based on the precautionary principle and the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be rectified at source and that the polluter should pay.
Program politike in ukrepov Skupnosti glede okolja in trajnostnega razvoja (peti delovni program Skupnosti o okolju) UL C 138, 17.5.1993, str.
The Community programme of policy and action in relation to the environment and sustainable development (Fifth Environmental Action Programme) OJ C 138, 17.5.1993, p.
Omenja odpadno električno in elektronsko opremo (OEEO) kot enega ciljnih področij, ki jih je treba urediti glede uporabe previdnostnega načela, načel predelave in varne odstranitve odpadkov.
It mentions waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) as one of the target areas to be regulated, in view of the application of the principles of prevention, recovery and safe disposal of waste.