natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(e) prepoved financiranja s strani tretjih oseb:
(e) no third-party funding:
– postopkov ne bi smele vnaprej financirati tretje osebe, recimo prek odstopitve morebitnih kasnejših pravic tožnikov do odškodnine tretji osebi;
– proceedings should not be pre-financed by third parties, with, for example, claimants agreeing to surrender to third parties possible subsequent entitlements to compensation;
– države članice ne bodo uporabljale strožjih pogojev za kolektivne tožbe zaradi kršitev prava EU od tistih, ki se uporabljajo za kršitve nacionalnega prava držav članic;
– Member States will not apply more restrictive conditions to the collective redress cases arising from the infringement of EU law than those applied to cases arising from the infringement of national law;
– nobeno od načel iz horizontalnega okvira ne preprečuje sprejetja dodatnih ukrepov za zagotovitev, da je pravo EU popolnoma učinkovito;
– none of the principles laid out in the horizontal framework will prevent the adoption of further measures to ensure that EU law is fully effective;
24. meni, da lahko učinkovit sistem kolektivnih tožb dejansko spodbudi razvoj mehanizmov za alternativno reševanje sporov, in sicer s spodbujanjem strank, da svoja nasprotja rešijo hitro in brez sodišča;
Believes that an effective system of collective redress could in fact stimulate the development of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms by creating an incentive for the parties to solve their disputes quickly out of court;
1. kot referenci v zadevah kolektivnih tožb, kadar vrednost zahtevka ne preseže področja uporabe uredbe;
1. as a reference for the purposes of collective redress in cases where the value of the claim does not exceed that regulation’s scope;
4. je prepričan, da je boljša preglednost cen bistvena, da se spodbuja konkurenca na enotnem trgu in potrošnikom ponudi resnična izbira;
Believes that improved price transparency is essential in order to stimulate competition in the single market and offer real choice to consumers;
6. je seznanjen s kompleksnostjo verige preskrbe s hrano in pomanjkanjem preglednosti cen hrane; je prepričan, da bo boljša analiza stroškov, postopkov, dodane vrednosti, količin, cen in marž v vseh segmentih verige preskrbe s hrano – vključno z boljšo preglednostjo kakovosti, v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom in poslovno zaupnostjo – izboljšala informacije, ki so na voljo potrošnikom, in preglednost mehanizmov določanja cen v verigi preskrbe s hrano ter tako izboljšala izbiro za potrošnike in preprečevala nepošteno diskriminacijo potrošnikov; pozdravlja ustanovitev foruma na visoki ravni za izboljšanje delovanja verige preskrbe s hrano in njene pozitivne učinke na izboljšanje trgovinskih praks;
Notes the complexity of the food supply chain and the lack of transparency in food pricing; believes that an improved analysis of costs, processes, added value, volumes, prices and margins across all sections of the food supply chain, including enhanced quality transparency, in line with competition law and commercial confidentiality, will enhance the information available to consumers and the transparency of price-setting mechanisms of the food supply chain, thereby improving choice for consumers and avoiding unfair consumer discrimination; welcomes the establishment of the High Level Forum for a Better Functioning Food Supply Chain and its positive effects on the improvement of trading practices;
10. pozdravlja odločitev Sveta, da podpre dolgo pričakovan enotni trg EU za patentno varstvo, ki bo zmanjšal stroške in dolgotrajne administrativne postopke za podjetnike ter s tem okrepil inovacije, spodbudil konkurenčno prednost držav članic in izboljšal enotni trg;
Welcomes the decision of the Council to support the long-awaited single EU patent system, which will reduce costs and time-consuming paperwork for entrepreneurs, thereby enhancing innovation, boosting the competitive advantage of Member States and improving the single market;
Simon Busuttil, Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, Liem Hoang Ngoc, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Antonija Prvanova (Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova))
Simon Busuttil, Ashley Fox, Anna Hedh, Liem Hoang Ngoc, María Irigoyen Pérez, Constance Le Grip, Antonyia Parvanova
o letnem poročilu o politiki konkurence EU
on the annual report on EU competition policy
1. poudarja, da mora popolna vzpostavitev notranjega trga za vse vrste prometa še naprej ostati glavni cilj evropske prometne politike;
Stresses that the completion of the internal market for all transport modes needs to be and to remain the main goal of the European transport policy;
4. se strinja s Komisijo, da EU še vedno nima dovolj povezanega, interoperabilnega in učinkovitega čezmejnega omrežja prometne infrastrukture, ki je nujno za pošteno konkurenco v okviru dokončne vzpostavitve notranjega trga;
Shares the Commission’s view that the EU still lacks a sufficiently interconnected, interoperable and efficient cross-border transport infrastructure network, which is indispensable for fair competition within the completion of the internal market;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi hitro odpravo vseh sedanjih omejitev kabotaže, da bo omogočila pošteno konkurenco in na splošno preprečila nepotrebno prazno vožnjo, ter uskladi socialne določbe na ravni EU, da se preprečita plačni damping in socialno neravnotežje;
Calls on the Commission to work on the swift abolition of all existing restrictions on cabotage, in order to allow fair competition and avoid as many unnecessary empty runs as possible, and on harmonisation of the social provisions at European level to prevent wage dumping and social imbalances;
13. je zaskrbljen zaradi prakse nekaterih letalskih prevoznikov, ki potnikom preprečujejo vkrcanje z artikli, kupljenimi v trgovinah na letališču, če ti niso vključeni v en kos ročne prtljage, a jim hkrati omogočajo neomejeno nakupovanje v letalu; meni, da ta praksa omejuje svobodo izbire in ustvarja nelojalno konkurenco; poziva Komisijo, naj začne preiskavo za prenehanje takšne prakse;
Is concerned about the practice adopted by some air carriers of preventing passengers from boarding with articles purchased in airport shops, in addition to their one item of hand luggage, but allowing them to make unrestricted purchases on board; considers that this practice restricts freedom of choice and creates unfair competition; urges the Commission to open an investigation with a view to putting an end to such practices;
19. izraža zadovoljstvo, da so pravice potnikov zdaj določene za vse prometne sektorje, in posebej pozdravlja namero Komisije, da bo objavila celovit skupni pregled pravic potnikov v vseh vrstah prometa; priporoča ji tudi, naj objavi priročnik/vodnik ter naj ga za boljše obveščanje potnikov razdeli čim večjemu krogu potnikov;
Expresses its satisfaction with the fact that passenger rights have now been regulated for all transport sectors and welcomes in particular the Commission’s intention to publish a comprehensive common overview of the rights of passengers using all transport modes; recommends to the Commission that it also publish a passengers’ handbook/guide, to be widely distributed in order to improve passenger information;
22. poziva države članice, naj pospešijo izvajanje tretje poštne direktive, in spodbuja Komisijo, naj podrobno oceni nadomestila za storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena na tem področju;
Calls on the Member States to speed up the implementation of the 3rd Postal Directive, and encourages the Commission to examine with due attention compensation for services of general economic interest (SGEI) in this field;
Burkhard Balz, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Syed Kamall, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Martin, Arlene McCarthy, Ivari Padar, Ani Podimata (Anni Podimata), Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells
Burkhard Balz, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Rachida Dati, Leonardo Domenici, Derk Jan Eppink, Diogo Feio, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Gunnar Hökmark, Syed Kamall, Othmar Karas, Wolf Klinz, Jürgen Klute, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Hans-Peter Martin, Arlene McCarthy, Ivari Padar, Anni Podimata, Antolín Sánchez Presedo, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Theodor Dumitru Stolojan, Kay Swinburne, Marianne Thyssen, Ramon Tremosa i Balcells
o načrtu za enotni evropski prometni prostor – na poti h konkurenčnemu in z viri gospodarnemu prometnemu sistemu
on the Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system
MNENJE Odbora za regionalni razvoj ..................................................................30
OPINION of the Committee on Regional Development ..................................30
o načrtu za enotni evropski prometni prostor – na poti h konkurenčnemu in z viri gospodarnemu prometnemu sistemu
on the ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige Komisije „Načrt za enotni evropski prometni prostor – na poti h konkurenčnemu in z viri gospodarnemu prometnemu sistemu“ ( KOM(2011)0144 ),
– having regard to the Commission White Paper entitled ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’ ( COM(2011)0144 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 12. februarja 2003 o beli knjigi Komisije „Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas za odločitev“
– having regard to its resolution of 12 February 2003 on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’
UL C 43E, 19.2.2004, str.
OJ C 43 E, 19.2.2004, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. julija 2007 o sporočilu „Naj Evropa ostane v gibanju – Trajnostna mobilnost za našo celino“
– having regard to its resolution of 12 July 2007 on ‘Keeping Europe moving – Sustainable mobility for our continent’
UL C 175E, 10.7.2008, str.
OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. oktobra 2010 o celostni pomorski politiki (CPP) – ocena dosedanjega napredka in novi izzivi
– having regard to its resolution of 21 October 2010 on the Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP) – evaluation of progress made and new challenges
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0386 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0386 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. julija 2011 o petem kohezijskem poročilu Komisije in strategiji za kohezijsko politiko po letu 2013
– having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2011 on the Commission's fifth Cohesion Report and the strategy for post-2013 cohesion policy
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0316 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0316 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. julija 2011 o varnosti letalstva s posebnim poudarkom na varnostnih skenerjih
– having regard to its resolution of 6 July 2011 on aviation security, with a special focus on security scanners
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0329 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0329 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 27. septembra 2011 o varnosti v cestnem prometu v Evropi v obdobju 2011–2020
– having regard to its resolution of 27 September 2011 on European road safety 2011-2020
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0408 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0408 . ,
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije „Mreža državljanov“ ( KOM(1995)0601 ) in „Akcijski načrt o mobilnosti v mestih“ ( KOM(2009)0490 ),
– having regard to the Commission communications entitled ‘The Citizens’ Network’ ( COM(1995)0601 ) and ‘Action Plan on Urban Mobility’ ( COM(2009)0490 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Pravičnim in učinkovitim prevozninam naproti“ iz leta 1995 (KOM(95)0691) in ker bi naj Komisija ponovno objavila sporočilo „Promet in CO­2“ (KOM(98)0204),
– having regard to the Commission's 1995 communication entitled ‘Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport’ (COM(95)0691), and to its 1998 communication entitled ‘Transport and CO 2 ’ (COM(98)0204); whereas the Commission should now republish the latter communication,
– ob upoštevanju strategije Evropa 2020,
– having regard to the EU 2020 Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju pravnega reda Evropske unije na področju transporta,
– having regard to the Community acquis in the field of transport,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora z regionalni razvoj ( A7-0425/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0425/2011 ),
A. ker evropska prometna politika neposredno vpliva na številne življenjske situacije državljanov EU in bi jim resnični enotni evropski prometni prostor brez kakršnih koli ovir med vrstami prometa in nacionalnimi sistemi ter brez izkrivljanja konkurence in socialnega dampinga prinesel veliko prednosti;
A. whereas European transport policy directly affects EU citizens in many situations in daily life, and whereas a genuine Single European Transport Area eliminating all barriers between transport modes and national systems and free of distortions of competition and social dumping would benefit them considerably;
B. ker je prometni sektor zelo pomemben za razvoj Evropske unije, njenih regij in mest, saj ustvari približno 5 % BDP in zagotavlja približno 10 milijonov delovnih mest; ker je bistveno ohraniti sposobnost EU za razvoj in inovacije na področjih, kot so mobilnost, promet in logistika, ki so odločilna za položaj Evrope kot industrijskega in gospodarskega središča ter za njen globalni konkurenčni položaj; ker imajo mala in srednje velika podjetja zlasti pomembno vlogo v prometnem sektorju;
B. whereas the transport sector is of major importance for the development of the European Union, its regions and its towns, as it accounts for some 5% of GDP and provides some 10 million jobs; whereas it is crucial to maintain the EU's capacity to develop and innovate in areas, such as mobility, transport and logistics, which are decisive for Europe’s position as an industrial and economic centre and its global competitive position; whereas small and medium-sized enterprises play a particularly important role in the transport sector;
C. ker mora prihodnja evropska politika za promet in mobilnost kot osnovno podlago za sprejemanje odločitev na tem področju vključevati cilje 20-20-20;
C. whereas the future European transport and mobility policy should integrate the 20-20-20 targets for the period to 2020 as a primary basis for decision-making in this field,
D. ker lahko promet bistveno prispeva k uresničevanju strategije Evropa 2020, zlasti na področju zaposlovanja, trajnostne gospodarske rasti, raziskav, energije, inovacij in okolja, pri čemer bi morali dosledneje spodbujati ter bolje usklajevati varnost in varstvo okolja,
D. whereas transport can make a significant contribution to the EU 2020 Strategy, particularly with regard to employment, sustainable economic growth, research, energy, innovation and the environment, bearing in mind that safety and environmental protection must be promoted more consistently and should be coordinated more closely;
E. ker nekateri cilji iz prejšnje bele knjige niso bili doseženi in bi zato morali redno preverjati in ocenjevati uresničevanje zdaj zastavljenih ciljev,
E. whereas certain goals of the last White Paper were not reached, and the goals set should therefore be regularly checked and assessed;
F. ker si različne vrste prometa ne bi smele konkurirati, temveč bi se morale dopolnjevati v okviru učinkovite somodalnosti kot vodilnega načela za učinkovito modalno porazdelitev med njimi,
F. whereas carriers should not be competitors, but should complement one another in a context of efficient co-modality, under the guiding principle of an efficient modal distribution of carriers;
G. ker ciljev preusmerjanja prometa med različnimi vrstami ni mogoče doseči z zakonodajo, temveč le z izkoristkom delujoče infrastrukture, temeljnimi koristmi in prednostmi ter s spodbudami;
G. whereas the targets for modal transfers cannot be achieved by means of legislation, but only by exploiting a functioning infrastructure, intrinsic advantages and strengths and incentives;
H. ker je treba zagotoviti uspešen razvoj vseevropskega prometnega omrežja (TEN-T), učinkovito povezati prometna omrežja vseh regij EU ter odpraviti razlike med stopnjami razvitosti infrastrukture v državah članicah EU;
H. whereas it is essential to ensure the successful development of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T), effectively link the transport networks of all EU regions and eliminate disparities between the levels of infrastructure development in the EU Member States,
I. ker se prometni sektor in čezmejna infrastruktura še vedno srečujeta z veliko zgodovinskimi in geografskimi ovirami (različni koloteki ali nepremagljive ovire gorskih masivov, kot so Alpe, Pireneji ali Karpati), ki povzročajo „mejne učinke“, ki jih je deloma preprosto rešiti in bi jih zato morali popolnoma odpraviti,
I. whereas the transport sector and cross-border infrastructure continue to face many historical and geographical obstacles (different track gauges or impregnable barriers in the form of mountain ranges such as the Alps, the Pyrenees or the Carpathians) that produce ‘frontier effects’, which can often be easily remedied and should therefore be reduced;
J. ker razlike med regijami v Evropi (obrobna lega, infrastruktura, pokrajina, gostota poseljenosti, socialno-ekonomske razmere) povzročajo različne težave in zato terjajo prožne rešitve,
J. whereas differences among regions in Europe (peripheral situation, infrastructure, landscape, population density, socio-economic situation) give rise to widely differing problems which need flexible solutions;
K. ker bi moralo biti odprtje trga prevoznih storitev pogojeno z razvojem vseh zaščitnih regulativnih ukrepov, ki so potrebni za zagotovitev, da bo odprtje trga izboljšalo kakovost storitev ter pogoje za izobraževanje in usposabljanje ter zaposlovanje,
K. whereas the opening-up of transport markets should be made conditional on the development of all the regulatory safeguards needed to guarantee that it will result in better quality services, training and employment conditions;
L. ker je treba določiti dosledne standarde na ravni EU za vse vrste prometa, zlasti na področju varnosti, tehnologije, varstva okolja in delovnih pogojev, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je mogoče sektorje, za katere dejansko veljajo pravila na svetovni ravni, učinkovito regulirati prek ustreznih mednarodnih forumov,
L. whereas the EU should set consistent standards for all carriers, with particular regard to safety, technology, environmental protection and working conditions, while taking into account the fact that, in sectors where global rules apply de facto, effective regulation can be achieved through the relevant international fora;
M. ker je treba zakonodajo, sprejeto na področju prometa, pravilno, dosledno in hitro prenesti, izvajati in izvrševati;
M. whereas the legislation adopted in the field of transport must be correctly, consistently and rapidly transposed, implemented and enforced;
5. podpira 10 ciljev za konkurenčen in z viri učinkovit prometni sistem ter cilje iz bele knjige do leta 2050, meni pa, da bi bilo treba natančneje opredeliti obdobje do leta 2020 v zvezi s financiranjem glede na gospodarske razmere v posameznih državah članicah in v zvezi s splošnimi izzivi prometa na področju energije in okolja, ter zato poziva Komisijo, naj skladu s cilji 20-20-20 in v sodelovanju z mednarodnimi partnerji oblikuje predpise, da bi dosegla 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij CO2 in drugih toplogrednih plinov iz prometa (v primerjavi z referenčnimi podatki iz leta 1990) ter naslednje vmesne cilje do leta 2020 (v primerjavi z referenčnimi podatki iz leta 2010):
Approves the 10 goals for a competitive and resource-efficient transport system and the targets set in the White Paper for 2050 and 2030, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period to 2020 with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment, and therefore calls on the Commission to draw up legal rules to achieve a 20% reduction in emissions of CO 2 and other GHGs from transport (by comparison with 1990 reference figures) and the following intermediate goals by 2020 (by comparison with 2010 reference figures), in accordance with the 20-20-20 targets and in cooperation with international partners:
– zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 v cestnem prometu za 20 %,
– a 20% reduction in CO 2 emissions from road transport,
– zmanjšanje hrupa in energijske porabe v železniškem prometu za 20 %,
– a 20% reduction in noise and energy consumption for rail transport,
– zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 letalskega prometa v celotnem evropskem zračnem prostoru za 30 %,
– a 30% reduction in CO 2 emissions from air transport across European airspace,
– enotno zmanjšanje emisij CO 2 in onesnaževal v pomorskem prometu v vsej EU za 30 %, k čemur bosta prispevala sporazuma Mednarodne pomorske organizacije o indeksu energetske učinkovitosti in načrtu upravljanja energetske učinkovitosti za ladje;
– an EU-wide uniform 30% reduction in emissions of CO 2 and pollutants in shipping, to which the IMO agreements on the Energy Efficiency Design Index and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan will make a contribution;
in poziva, naj se vsi cilji iz tega odstavka obravnavajo kot prednostne naloge in naj se zato vsako leto preverijo;
and calls for all the goals referred to in this paragraph to be considered priorities, which should therefore be checked every year;
7. poudarja, da je potencial prometa na številnih področij še vedno premalo raziskan, in vztraja na pomembnosti enotnega evropskega prometnega prostora z medsebojno povezanostjo in interoperabilnostjo, ki bo temeljila na pristnem evropskem upravljanju prometne infrastrukture in sistemov, doseženem z odpravo „mejnih učinkov“ med državami članicami za vse vrste prometa, da bi povečali konkurenčnost in privlačnost celotne Evropske unije; poudarja pomen teritorialne kohezije in zlasti težav v zvezi z dostopnostjo, s katerimi se soočajo najbolj oddaljene regije, otoki, neobalne in obrobne regije, ter dobrih povezav med državami članicami in sosednjimi državami;
Highlights the as yet insufficiently explored potential of transport in many areas, and insists on the importance of a single European transport area, with interconnection and interoperability, based on genuinely European management of transport infrastructure and systems achieved by eliminating 'border-effects' between Member States in all transport modes, in order to enhance the competitiveness and attractiveness of the entire European Union; stresses the importance of territorial cohesion and, in particular, the accessibility problems facing the outermost regions, islands, landlocked and peripheral regions and good connections between Member States and their neighbouring countries;
9. ugotavlja visoko stopnjo odvisnosti Unije od uvoženih fosilnih goriv, katerih dobava iz držav zunaj Unije je povezana z velikimi tveganji v smislu ekonomske varnosti Unije in prožnosti možnosti njene zunanje politike, ter poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli in redno ocenjuje zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo iz držav zunaj Unije;
Notes the Union's high degree of dependence on imported fossil fuels, whose supply from outside the Union entails significant risks in terms of the Union’s economic security and in terms of the flexibility of its external policy options, and calls on the Commission to define and regularly measure the Union’s security of external energy supply ;