natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
L. ker je treba z gospodinjskimi odpadki ravnati skladno s hierarhijo odpadkov, ki temelji na preprečevanju, zmanjševanju, ponovni uporabi, recikliranju, predelavi (npr. v energijo) ter odstranjevanju odpadkov, v skladu s členom 4 okvirne direktive o odpadkih;
L. whereas household waste should be managed in compliance with the waste hierarchy, which is built on prevention, reduction, reuse, recycling , recovery (e.g. energy) and disposal, in accordance with Article 4 of the WFD;
M. ker je Evropa, gospodarna z viri, eden od vodilnih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020 in ker je okvirna direktiva o odpadkih uvedla cilj glede recikliranja komunalnih odpadkov – in sicer 50 % –, ki ga morajo do leta 2020 izpolniti vse države članice, s čimer priznava, da je razvoj EU v krožno in okolju prijazno gospodarstvo, ki odpadke uporablja kot vir, pomemben element cilja učinkovite rabe virov;
M. whereas a resource-efficient Europe is one of the flagship targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy and the WFD introduced a 50% target for recycling of municipal waste, to be met by 2020 in all Member States, recognising that developing the EU into a circular and green economy that uses waste as a resource is an important element of the resource efficiency goal;
N. ker obstaja več vzrokov za neuspešno oblikovanje načrtov ravnanja z odpadki, skladnih z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih: ti vključujejo neizvajanje in neizvrševanje, pomanjkanje ustrezno usposobljenega osebja na lokalni in regionalni ravni, pomanjkanje usklajevanje na nacionalni ravni; nezadostni nadzor na ravni EU, nedodeljevanje ustreznih finančnih virov in neobstoj sistema glob, zaradi česar se zanemarjajo priložnosti za učinkovito ravnanje z odpadki, s katerimi bi zmanjšali emisije toplogrednih plinov in druge vplive na okolje ter odvisnost Evrope od uvoženih surovin;
N. whereas there are several reasons why waste management plans in compliance with the WFD are not in place: these include a lack of implementation and enforcement, properly trained personnel at local and regional level and coordination at national level; insufficient controls at EU level, failure to allocate adequate resources and the lack of a fine system, thereby neglecting the opportunities of good waste management to reduce GHG emissions and other environmental impacts and for reducing Europe’s dependency on imported raw materials;
O. ker je pomemben dejavnik, ki se pogosto zanemarja, dejstvo, da bi panoga recikliranja lahko zagotovila do pol milijona delovnih mest, saj so določene vrste odpadkov proizvodni vir, ki lahko prispeva k povečanju okoljske trajnostnosti in k prehodu na okolju prijazno gospodarstvo;
O. whereas an important factor, often neglected, is that the recycling industry offers the potential of up to half a million jobs, as certain types of waste constitute a productive resource which can contribute to enhancing environmental sustainability and to the move towards a green economy;
P. ker je ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki v EU še vedno v povojih, zaradi česar je treba dodelati veljavne zakonodajne instrumente ter povečati učinkovitost obstoječih metod;
P. whereas biowaste management in the EU is still in its relative infancy and the current legislative instruments need to be developed and techniques made more efficient;
Q. ker mora skladnost s cilji EU glede zbiranja, recikliranja in preusmeritve z odlagališč še naprej ostati prednostna naloga;
Q. whereas compliance with EU targets for collection, recycling and landfill diversion must remain a priority;
R. ker države članice – na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni – nosijo glavno odgovornost za izvajanje zakonodaje EU in ker državljani menijo, da je EU odgovorna za zagotavljanje izvajanja politike o odpadkih, pri čemer pa nima ustreznih sredstev za izvrševanje zakonodaje;
R. whereas the Member States – at national, regional and local level – bear the main responsibility for implementing EU legislation, and whereas the EU is held responsible by citizens for ensuring implementation of waste policy but does not have the adequate means to enforce the legislation;
S. ker imajo državljani skladno z Aarhuškokonvencijo pravico, da so obveščeni o razmerah na lastnem ozemlju, in ker so oblasti odgovorne za zagotavljanje informacij in spodbujanje državljanov k oblikovanju odgovornega odnosa in vedenja; ker morajo v skladu z Direktivo št. 2003/35/ES države članice javnosti zagotoviti zgodnje in učinkovite možnosti sodelovanja pri pripravi in spremembi ali pregledu načrtov ali programov, ki jih je treba oblikovati;
S. whereas, according to the Aarhus Convention, citizens have the right to be informed of the situation in their own territory and it is the duty of the authorities to provide information and to motivate citizens to develop a responsible attitude and behaviour; whereas, in accordance with Directive 2003/35/EC, Member States shall ensure that the public is given early and effective opportunities to participate in the preparation and modification or review of the plans or programmes required to be drawn up;
T. ker državljani v okviru postopka vlaganja peticij izražajo občutek, da javni organi položaja nimajo pod nadzorom, hkrati pa se sami včasih niso pripravljeni potruditi, da bi prispevali k rešitvi; ker je razmerje zaupanja okrnjeno ter prihaja do javnih obračunov in ohromljenosti, ki preprečuje ukrepanje;
T. whereas, through the petitions process, citizens express a feeling that the public authorities are not in control of the situation and are sometimes not prepared to make the efforts required to contribute to solutions, the relationship of trust is damaged and there is a downhill slide towards open confrontation and paralysis, thereby preventing action;
U. ker je nedavna študija
U. whereas a recent study
V. ker je študija razkrila tudi visoko stopnjo neizpolnjevanja zahtev, nezakonito odlaganje in pošiljke odpadkov, veliko število pritožb državljanov, primere kršitev pred Sodiščem Evropske unije ter posledično neuspešno varovanje javnega zdravja in okolja, kar je osnovni cilj zakonodaje EU na področju odpadkov;
V. whereas the study also identifies a high level of non-compliance, illegal waste dumping and shipments, large numbers of complaints from citizens and infringement cases before the ECJ, and therefore underachievement in protecting public health and the environment, an overarching goal of EU waste legislation;
W. ker je nezakonito odlaganje odpadkov postalo tudi del dejavnosti organiziranega kriminala, kar poraja vprašanja glede vloge odgovornih organov in, glede industrijskih odpadkov, tajnih dogovorov v industriji;
W. whereas illegal waste disposal has also become part of the activities of organised crime, which raises questions about the role of the authorities responsible and, in respect of industrial waste, of industry collusion;
X. ker so postopki spremljanja in nadzora, ki se uporabljajo za preprečevanje kontaminacije gospodinjskih odpadkov s strupenimi odpadki, včasih slabi ali pa sploh ne obstajajo, zaradi česar prihaja do kontaminacije odlagališč in sežigalnic; ker je treba poudariti, da je odstranjevanje strupenih odpadkov s sežiganjem v napravah, zasnovanih za sežiganje gospodinjskih odpadkov, brezpogojno prepovedano;
X. whereas monitoring and control procedures in place to ensure that household waste is not contaminated by toxic waste are sometimes weak or non-existent, leading to contamination of landfills and incinerators; whereas it must be stressed that disposing of toxic waste through incineration in installations conceived for burning household waste is categorically prohibited;
Y. ker poglobljena analiza peticij potrjuje, da zakonodaja za dobro delujoč in okoljsko sprejemljiv sistem za ravnanje z odpadki obstaja in da so glavna vprašanja povezana z njenim izvajanjem in izvrševanjem, saj se kar 95 % vseh peticij nanaša na neuspešno delovanje oblasti na lokalni ali regionalni ravni;
Y. whereas an in-depth analysis of the petitions confirms that the legislation for a functioning and environmentally sound waste management system is largely in place and that the main issues concern implementation and enforcement, with 95% of the petitions related to failure at the local or regional level of government;
Z. ker pomanjkanje informacij, ozaveščenosti, upravne zmogljivosti in finančnih ter drugih virov na lokalni ravni predstavljajo bistvene dejavnike za nastalo stanje,
Z. whereas one of the crucial factors identified for this state of affairs is a lack of information, awareness, administrative capacity and financial and other resources at local level;
AA. ker je Komisija okrepila podporo – vključno s 4,1 milijardo EUR v letih 2005/2006 – za boljše izvajanje in izvrševanje pravnega reda EU na področju odpadkov na nacionalni ravni; ker so kljub temu ob koncu leta 2009 primeri kršitev, povezani z odpadki, predstavljali 20 % vseh okoljskih kršitev;
AA. whereas the Commission has stepped up support – including EUR 4.1 billion in 2005/6 – to improve implementation and enforcement of the EU waste acquis at national level; whereas, at the end of 2009, infringement cases related to waste nevertheless constituted 20% of all environmental infringements;
AB. ker so stroški slabega ravnanja z odpadki visoki in ker bi regionalni sistem, ki bi lahko zaokrožil celotni cikel, ustvaril znatne prihranke;
AB. whereas the cost of bad waste management is high and a regional system capable of completing the whole cycle would produce substantial savings;
AC. ker je za izvajanje zakonodaje o odpadkih v EU sicer odgovoren javni sektor, vendar pa s 60 % vseh gospodinjskih odpadkov in 75 % odpadkov, ki jih proizvedejo podjetja, ravnajo zasebna podjetja in multinacionalke, ki letno ustvarijo 75 milijard EUR
AC. whereas, while the implementation of waste legislation in the EU is a public responsibility, private and multinational companies deal with 60% of household waste and 75% of waste from businesses, with an annual turnover of EUR 75 billion
„Bruseljska deklaracija“ Evropske zveze služb za ravnanje z odpadki in okolje (FEAD), 15. februar 2011. prometa;
FEAD ‘Brussels Declaration’, 15 February 2011. ;
AD. ker vzpostavitev novih odlagališč in sežigalnic ureja Priloga I.9 direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje
AD. whereas the establishment of new landfills and incinerators falls under Annex I.9 of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Directive
85/337/EGS. , ki skladno s členom 4(1) zahteva presojo vplivov na okolje ali vsaj pregled, kot izhaja iz člena 4(2), če je odlagališče vključeno v Prilogo II.11(b);
85/337/EEC. , requiring an EIA under Article 4(1) or at least screening according to Article 4(2) if the landfill falls under Annex II11.b;
AE. ker so dovoljenja za odlagališča vključena v Prilogo II direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje, če bodo ta „verjetno pomembno vplivala na okolje“, in se zanje uporabljajo pragovi, ki jih določijo države članice;
AE. whereas permits for landfills fall under Annex II of the EIA Directive if they are ‘likely to have significant effects on the environment’ and subject to threshold criteria set by the Member States;
AF. ker člen 6(4) direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje določa, da „prizadeta javnost dobi zgodnje in učinkovite možnosti sodelovanja v postopkih okoljskega odločanja v skladu s členom 2(2) in je tako upravičena izraziti predloge in mnenja, ko so pristojnemu organu ali organom pred odločitvijo o zahtevanem soglasju k posegu odprte vse možnosti“;
AF. whereas Article 6(4) of the EIA Directive lays down that ‘The public concerned shall be given early and effective opportunities to participate in the environmental decision-making procedures referred to in Article 2(2) and shall, for that purpose, be entitled to express comments and opinions when all options are open to the competent authority or authorities before the decision on the request for development consent is taken’;
AG. ker se direktive EU in Aarhuška konvencija izrecno sklicujejo na dostop do informacij in sodelovanje javnosti pri odločanju v okoljskih zadevah;
AG. whereas EU Directives and the Aarhus Convention make specific reference to access to information and public participation in decision-making in environmental matters;
AH. ker številne peticije navajajo, da postopki izdaje dovoljenj za zmogljivosti za ravnanje z odpadki niso bili povsem skladni z zakonodajo EU, predvsem kar zadeva direktivo o presoji vplivov na okolje in javno posvetovanje;
AH. whereas many petitions allege that the permitting procedure for waste management facilities was not fully in line with EU legislation, especially as regards the EIA and public consultation;
AI. ker v primerih, ko so dovoljenja skladna s parametri, določenimi v direktivi, in je bila izvedena presoja vplivov na okolje, Komisija nima pristojnosti, da bi se vmešavala v odločitve nacionalnih organov; ker pa nekatere države članice pred izdajo dovoljenj za odprtje ali razširitev odlagališč ali izgradnjo sežigalnic niso izvedle temeljitih presoj vplivov na okolje;
AI. whereas, if permits are in compliance with the parameters set out in the directive and the EIA has been conducted, the Commission does not have the power to interfere with decisions taken by national authorities; whereas, however, some Member States have not conducted thorough EIAs before granting permits for opening or expanding landfills or building incinerators;
AJ. ker se pravni postopki lahko začnejo šele potem, ko države članice projekt potrdijo; ker državljani težko razumejo, da EU ne more dejansko posredovati, dokler ni celoten postopek zaključen in ni država članica projekta odobrila;
AJ. whereas legal proceedings can only be launched once a project has been approved by the Member States; whereas it is hard for citizens to understand that the EU cannot effectively intervene until the whole procedure has been concluded and the project has been approved by the Member States;
AK. ker se vprašanja, ki jih postavljajo državljani v postopku javnega posvetovanja in pri presoji vplivov na okolje, povezani z načrtovanimi lokacijami za nova odlagališča, pogosto porajajo zaradi domnevnih kršitev predpisov glede zaščitenih območij, kot v primeru odlagališča v narodnem parku Vezuv, ali zaradi pomislekov v zvezi z negativnimi vplivi na zdravje in dobro počutje;
AK. whereas the questions raised by citizens during the public consultation process and the Environmental Impact Assessment on planned locations for new landfills often concern alleged violations of protected areas, as in the case of the landfill in the Vesuvius national park, or fears over a negative impact on health and well-being;
AL. ker direktiva o odlagališčih določa parametre za odobritev obratovalnih dovoljenj in za skupne postopke spremljanja v fazah obratovanja in po prenehanju obratovanja ter ker se za odlagališča, ki so bila zaprta pred prenosom te direktive, njene določbe ne uporabljajo; ker se merila, našteta v direktivi, nanašajo na lokacijo, nadzorovanje vode in ravnanje z izcedno vodo, varstvo tal in vode, nadziranje plinov, škodljive vplive in nevarnosti, stabilnost in ovire;
AL. whereas the Landfill Directive lays down the parameters for granting operating permits and for common monitoring procedures during the operation and after-care phases and whereas landfills closed before transposition of the Directive are not subject to its provisions; whereas the criteria enumerated in the Directive refer to location, water control and leachate management, protection of soil and water, gas control, nuisances and hazards, stability and barriers;
AM. ker je Odbor za peticije prejel več peticij – zlasti tisto, ki je privedla do misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v kraju Path Head (Združeno kraljestvo) – glede odlagališč, ki se nahajajo v neposredni bližini hiš in kjer prebivalstvo trpi zaradi škodljivega smradu, povečane onesnaženosti zraka in razmnoževanja škodljivcev v bližini njihovih hiš; ker pa zakonodaja EU ne predpisuje natančnejših meril glede oddaljenosti odlagališč od domov, šol in bolnišnic, je treba za opredelitev natančnih zahtev, ki bi zagotovile varovanje zdravja ljudi in okolja, upoštevati načelo subsidiarnosti, navedeno v pogodbah;
AM. whereas t he Committee on Petitions has received several petitions – notably the one which gave rise to the fact-finding mission to Path Head (UK) – which concerned landfills in close proximity to the nearest houses and where the population suffers noxious odours, increased air pollution and propagation of vermin close to their houses; whereas , however , as more precise criteria concerning the proximity of landfill sites to homes, schools and hospitals have not been laid down in EU law , the definition of the precise requirements to ensure the protection of human health and the environment are subject to the subsidiarity principle enshrined in the Treaties ;
AN. ker so v peticijah o odlagališčih pogosto izražene skrbi, ki se nanašajo na možnost onesnaženja podtalnice, saj starejša odlagališča morda nimajo tesnilne plasti, ki bi preprečevala pronicanje v vodonosnike, ali pa se tesnilne plasti zdijo poškodovane in vzbujajo sum na pronicanje ali pa so odlagališča na geološko nestabilnem terenu in preblizu podtalnici/zalogam pitne vode;
AN . whereas petitions on landfills have frequently expressed concerns related to possible groundwater pollution, because older landfills may not have a liner preventing seepage into aquifers or the liners may look torn and create the suspicion of seepage or be on geologically unstable ground and too close to groundwater/drinking water reserves;
AO. ker Komisija poroča, da je od leta 2001 sprožila 177 postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev direktive o odlagališčih in da je v nedavnem pregledu ugotovila, da v celotni EU obstaja najmanj 619 nezakonitih odlagališč;
AO. whereas the Commission reports that 177 infringements of the Landfill Directive have been initiated since 2001 and that a recent inventory identified a minimum of 619 illegal landfills across the EU;
AP. ker peticije in pritožbe, predložene pri Komisiji, dokazujejo obstoj velikega števila nezakonitih odlagališč, ki obratujejo brez dovoljenj, čeprav natančnega števila ni mogoče določiti zaradi pomanjkanja ustreznega spremljanja;
AP. whereas petitions and complaints to the Commission testify to the presence of a large number of illegal landfills operating without permits, though the exact number is unknown for lack of adequate monitoring;
AQ. ker je treba opozoriti, da bi moralo biti odlaganje odpadkov na odlagališčih zadnja možnost; ker se javni organi v nekaterih državah članicah, ki zaostajajo pri preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov, njihovega recikliranja in ponovne uporabe, lahko znajdejo pod pritiskom, naj za potrebe odstranjevanja odpadkov kratkoročno razširijo obstoječa – tudi neustrezna – ali odprejo nova odlagališča;
AQ. whereas it is recalled that landfilling should be a solution of last resort; whereas public authorities in some Member States which have fallen behind with waste prevention, recycling and reuse may be under pressure to expand existing – even non-compliant – landfills or open new ones in the short term as a method for eliminating refuse;
AR. ker je uporaba sežigalnic, ki se uvršča nizko v hierarhiji ravnanja z odpadki, uveljavljena in dobro sprejeta s strani državljanov v nekaterih državah, za katere se zdi, da so dosegle visoko raven skladnosti z okvirno direktivo o odpadkih, in ki v okviru tega postopka pridobivajo energijo; ker bi se v državah, ki še ne uporabljajo sežiganja odpadkov, lahko odločili zanj, da bi odpravili zaostanek glede nakopičenih odpadkov;
AR. whereas the use of incinerators, which is low in the waste hierarchy, is well established and accepted by citizens in some countries considered to have reached a high level of compliance with the WFD and which recover energy in the process, and whereas countries which so far have not resorted to incineration may choose to do so in order to deal with accumulated backlogs;
AS. ker se to lahko zgodi le pod pogojem, da se zagotovi strog nadzor in spoštovanje ustrezne zakonodaje EU, in ob upoštevanju dejstva, da lahko takšni ukrepi sprožijo razumljiv odpor najbolj neposredno prizadetih državljanov v bližini, ki jih skrbijo vplivi na njihovo zdravje;
AS. whereas this can only be done on condition of strict control and respect for the relevant EU legislation and bearing in mind that such measures are likely to provoke understandable resistance from the most immediately affected populations in the vicinity, who are concerned about effects on their health;
AT. ker je treba priznati, da so se z novejšimi tehnologijami izpusti iz sežigalnic občutno zmanjšali; ker se v nekaterih državah članicah – zlasti v tistih z visokimi stopnjami sežiganja odpadkov – zdi, da lokalno prebivalstvo to tehnologijo sprejema v večji meri, morda zaradi zavesti o proizvedeni toploti ali električni energiji v sežigalnicah, pa tudi zaradi preglednosti in dostopnosti informacij o njihovem delovanju;
AT. whereas it should be acknowledged that more recent technology has reduced emissions from incinerators significantly; whereas in certain Member States – in particular those with high levels of waste incineration – local populations seem to show a higher level of acceptance, perhaps in recognition of the production of heat or power by incinerators, and also because of the transparency and accessibility of information on their functioning;
AU. ker so dovoljenja za odprtje sežigalnic sprejeta s podobnim odporom kot za odlagališča – in sicer iz istih razlogov –, pri čemer je poudarjen strah pred onesnaženjem zraka in negativni vplivi na javno zdravje in/ali okoljsko zaščitena območja;
AU. whereas permits for the establishment of incinerators meet with similar resistance, for similar reasons, to landfills, with the emphasis on fears of air pollution and negative impact on public health and/or environmentally protected zones;
AV. ker javni organi za odprtje sežigalnic pogosto izberejo območja, ki že trpijo zaradi močne onesnaženosti zraka, ker ne bi smeli prezreti kumulativnih učinkov za zdravje prebivalcev območja in ker se iskanje drugih načinov odstranjevanja odpadkov in proizvodnje energije z metanizacijo pogosto zanemari;
AV. whereas public authorities often choose areas already suffering from heavy air pollution for the establishment of incinerators, cumulative effects on the health of the inhabitants of the area should not be ignored and exploration of alternative methods of disposal of waste and production of energy through methanisation is often neglected;
AW. ker osredotočanje na sežiganje odpadkov za proizvodnjo energije kot prva izbira kljub temu predstavlja način ravnanja z odpadki, ki je bolj potraten od preprečevanja, recikliranja in ponovne uporabe odpadkov, in je zato slednjim treba dati prednost, skladno s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki iz okvirne direktive o odpadkih;
AW. whereas a focus on incineration for energy production as a first choice nevertheless represents a more wasteful method of waste management than prevention, recycling and reuse, which is why these should be given priority, in accordance with the waste hierarchy of the WFD;
AX. ker so za izpolnitev zakonsko določenih ciljev recikliranja in preprečevanja potrebni aktivno sodelovanje civilne družbe, izboljšano sodelovanje zainteresiranih strani in večja ozaveščenost javnosti, ki jih je treba doseči z medijskimi kampanjami za povečanje ozaveščenosti javnosti;
AX. whereas what is required in order to meet legally established recycling and prevention targets is the active participation of civil society, improved stakeholder participation and increased public awareness, to be achieved through media campaigns to raise public awareness;
AY. ker vsa poročila misij za ugotavljanje dejstev Odbora za peticije o vprašanjih odpadkov omenjajo slabo ali neobstoječo komunikacijo med državljani in organi, kar lahko v nekaterih primerih privede do napetih situacij in tudi do demonstracij državljanov, kot pogosto poročajo v medijih;
AY. whereas all the reports on fact-finding missions of the Committee on Petitions on waste issues mention the poor or non-existent communication between citizens and authorities, which in some cases can lead to tense situations arising and also demonstrations by citizens, as often reported in the press;