natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja odločitev Komisije, da se mesto generalnega direktorja OLAF zapolni na podlagi javnega razpisa v Uradnem listu, da bi se lahko izvedel resničen in verodostojen izbirni postopek, ter da bi se generalnemu direktorju dodelila trden mandat in zadostna verodostojnost;
Welcomes the Commission's decision to fill the post of Director-General of OLAF following a public call for applications in the Official Journal, so that a genuine and credible selection process can take place with a view to endowing the Director-General with a valid mandate and sufficient credibility;
upošteva odločitev Komisije, sprejete na 1691. seji dne 22. februarja 2005, da dosedanji generalni direktor opravlja tekoče posle do odločitve o novem imenovanju;
Notes the Commission's decision, taken at its 1691st meeting on 22 February 2005, to give the current Director-General responsibility for conducting routine business until the new appointment is made;
meni, da bi bilo bolje, če bi Komisija po dogovoru s Parlamentom in Svetom imenovala vmesnega direktorja, ki ne bi bil omejen v svoji svobodi ravnanja; meni, da je treba določbe za imenovanje začasnega direktorja vključiti v uredbo OLAF;
Takes the view that the Commission would have been better advised to appoint, by agreement with Parliament and the Council, an interim Director whose freedom of action would not have been restricted; is of the opinion that provisions for appointing an interim Director must be added to the OLAF regulation;
opozarja, da je že v odstavku 55 svoje resolucije z dne 4. decembra 2003 o poročilu Komisije o oceni dejavnosti Evropskega urada za boj proti goljufijam (OLAF) UL C 89 E, 14.4.2004, str.
Points out that in paragraph 55 of its resolution of 4 December 2003 on the Commission report on the evaluation of the activities of the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) OJ C 89 E, 14.4.2004, p.
zahteval pravočasen javni razpis mesta generalnega direktorja OLAF ter da je treba zamudo, ki je nastala, pripisati samo in izključno Komisiji, ki je veliko predolgo ostala nedejavna, preden je sprožila predpisan postopek;
it called for the post of OLAF Director-General to be advertised promptly and that responsibility for the delay which has now occurred lies solely with the Commission, which waited far too long before initiating the requisite procedures;
meni, da je zdaj posebej pomembno, da ne nastopijo nove nepotrebne zamude in da se čim prej sprejme odločitev o novem imenovanju;
Regards it now as particularly important that no further unnecessary delays should occur and that a decision on the new appointment should be taken as soon as possible;
poudarja, da lahko Komisija v skladu s členom 12 uredbe OLAF oblikuje seznam kandidatov z zahtevanimi kvalifikacijami šele po pozitivnem mnenju nadzornega odbora OLAF, torej da mora imeti nadzorni odbor možnost, da preveri in oceni vse prijave, preden Komisija na tej podlagi sestavi seznam primernih kandidatov;
Emphasises that pursuant to Article 12 of the OLAF Regulation, the Commission can draw up the list of suitably qualified candidates only after the OLAF Supervisory Committee has given a favourable opinion, i.e. that the Supervisory Committee must be given the opportunity to consider and assess all the applications before, on that basis, the Commission draws up the list of suitable candidates;
poudarja, da Komisija imenuje generalnega direktorja OLAF v dogovoru s Parlamentom in Svetom, torej, da se mora izvesti zaslišanje; opozarja, da je bil ta dogovor sprejet, ker daljnosežnih pooblastil generalnega direktorja OLAF (uvedba in zaključek preiskav, posredovanje podatkov nacionalnim sodnim organom) nimajo le člani in uslužbenci Komisije, ampak tudi Parlament, Svet in druge institucije in organi Skupnosti;
Emphasises that the Commission appoints the OLAF Director-General by agreement with Parliament and the Council, i.e. that a consensus must be secured; points out that this arrangement was laid down on the grounds that the far-reaching powers enjoyed by the OLAF Director-General (initiation and conclusion of investigations, forwarding of information to national judicial authorities) cover not only Members and employees of the Commission, but also Parliament, the Council and the Community's other institutions and bodies;
Poročilo in mnenja Računskega sodišča
Report and opinions of the Court of Auditors
pričakuje, da bo dolgo pričakovano posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča pravočasno na razpolago, da bi se njegovi rezultati upoštevali pri zaslišanju kandidatov za mesto generalnega direktorja;
Expects the long-awaited special report of the Court of Auditors to be available in good time for its findings to be taken into account at the hearings of the candidates for the post of Director-General;
poziva Računsko sodišče, da v svojih mnenjih o zakonodajnih predlogih, ki so bili predloženi v skladu s členom 280 Pogodbe ES, posebno pozornost nameni naslednjim vprašanjem:
Calls on the Court of Auditors, in its opinions on the legislative proposals which have now been submitted pursuant to Article 280 of the EC Treaty, to pay particular attention to the following questions;
Kako je mogoče okrepiti neodvisno preiskovalno funkcijo OLAF?
how can OLAF's independent investigatory role be strengthened?
Ali je mogoče združiti preiskovalna pooblastila OLAF v enem samem pravnem besedilu?
can the relevant provisions laying down OLAF's investigatory powers be consolidated in a single legal text?
Spremljanje pripomb in zahtev iz preteklih let
Follow-up to remarks and calls from previous years
poziva OLAF, da nadaljuje z dialogom, ki je bil začet novembra 2004, o tem, do katerih podatkov lahko ima dostop Parlament, da bi našel pot do izpolnitve svojih nadzornih pooblastil in hkrati zagotovil zaupnost preiskav OLAF;
Calls on OLAF to resume the dialogue, which began in November 2004, on what information Parliament can have access to in connection with its work, with a view to finding a way of respecting Parliament's supervisory powers and, at the same time, guaranteeing the confidentiality of OLAF investigations;
ugotavlja, da je delovna skupina Eurostat v obdobju poročanja OLAF obravnavala 14 primerov: štiri zunanje preiskave in deset notranjih preiskav, od tega jih junija 2004 devet še ni bilo zaključenih; pet rezultatov preiskav je bilo predanih luksemburškim ali francoskim organom za kazenski pregon; pričakuje poročilo o napredku od Komisije in OLAF najkasneje do 1. oktobra 2005;
Notes that during the period covered by the OLAF report the Eurostat Task Force dealt with 14 cases, four external and 10 internal investigations, of which nine had not yet been completed in June 2004; five sets of findings have been forwarded to the Luxembourg and French criminal justice authorities, as appropriate; looks to the Commission and OLAF to submit a progress report by 1 October 2005 at the latest;
ugotavlja, da so v skladu s sklepom sodišča na predstavništvu Komisije na Dunaju obstajala zaposlitvena razmerja, pri katerih so se obšli veljavni delovnopravni in socialno-pravni predpisi; sprašuje, kateri rezultat je dosegla preiskava OLAF in katere ukrepe je sprejela Komisija; poleg tega sprašuje, kateri stroški Komisije so nastali že s tem, da je ta izgubila postopke na delovnem sodišču in je morala dodatno plačati prispevke za socialno varnost; prav tako sprašuje, kateri nadaljnji stroški bi še lahko nastali;
Notes that, according to a court ruling, employment arrangements at the Commission Representation in Vienna breached current Austrian labour and social welfare law; asks what findings the OLAF investigation has brought to light and what measures the Commission has taken; asks, further, what costs the Commission has already incurred as a result of losing these labour tribunal cases and being required to pay outstanding social security contributions; asks, finally, what further costs might still be generated;
pozdravlja razvoj, ki ga je opaziti v nekaterih državah članicah, kot npr. uvedbo novih predpisov, ki nalagajo kazni v primeru nepravilnosti;
Expresses its satisfaction with developments in some Member States, such as the adoption of new regulatory provisions imposing penalties in the event of irregularities;
ugotavlja, da je bila verjetna zloraba denarnih sredstev iz programa Leonardo da Vinci preiskana Glej odstavka 13 in 14 njegove zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 30. marca 2004.
Notes that the likely misuse of funds from the Leonardo da Vinci Programme has been investigated See paragraphs 13 and 14 of its above-mentioned resolution of 30 March 2004.
ter da so bili ustrezni dokumenti predani romunskim organom za kazenski pregon;
and that the relevant documents have been handed over to the Romanian criminal justice authorities;
ugotavlja, da je pri izvozu žive govedi v Libanon Glej odstavek 23 in sledeče njegove zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 30. marca 2004.
Notes that the export of live cattle to Lebanon See paragraph 23 et seq. of its above-mentioned resolution of 30 March 2004.
v preteklosti prihajalo do zlorabe pri povračilih izvoza ter da so Nemčija, Francija in Avstrija sprejele sklepe za izterjatev;
has in the past given rise to the misuse of export refunds and that Germany, France and Austria have issued recovery orders;
obžaluje, da je Komisija doslej zamudila vzpostavitev pregleda, iz katerega bi bilo razvidno, katera mednarodna svetovalna podjetja so delala za Komisijo na področjih neposrednih in posrednih izdatkov Glej odstavek 52 njegove zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 30. marca 2004.
Regrets the fact that the Commission has thus far failed to draw up a survey giving the names of the international consultancies which have worked for the Commission in the areas of direct and indirect expenditure See paragraph 52 of its above-mentioned resolution of 30 March 2004.
; od Komisije pričakuje, da bo do 1. julija 2005 prejel pregled;
; looks to the Commission to provide it with such a survey by 1 July 2005;
opozarja Komisijo, da je pozvana, da Parlamentu predloži sporočilo, v katerem preuči, kako bi bilo mogoče dati različnim pravnim instrumentom, ki se uporabijo pri preiskavah OLAF, skupni pravni okvir Glej odstavek 41 njegove zgoraj omenjene resolucije z dne 30. marca 2004.
Reminds the Commission that it has been asked to submit to Parliament a communication in which it considers how the various legal instruments governing OLAF investigations could be combined to form a joint legal framework See paragraph 41 of its above-mentioned resolution of 30 March 2004.
z zaskrbljenostjo spremlja tiskovna poročila, po katerih je OLAF ugotovil, da naj bi zaradi nepravilnega upravljanja znotraj Komisije pri prenovi stavbe Berlaymont nastala izguba v višini do 180 milijonov EUR; poziva OLAF da pojasni točno stanje; od Komisije do 1. septembra 2005 pričakuje podatke o tem, kateri koraki so bili storjeni s strani Komisije na podlagi zadevnega poročila OLAF;
Notes with concern press reports claiming that OLAF has established that in-house mismanagement at the Commission in connection with the renovation of the Berlaymont Building has resulted in an alleged loss to the budget of up to EUR 180 million; calls on OLAF to clarify the exact position; looks to the Commission to give details by 1 September 2005 of the action it has taken on the basis of the relevant OLAF report;
je razočaran nad negativnim odzivom Komisije na odstavek 123 resolucije o razrešnici Komisije z dne 21. aprila 2004 UL L 330, 4.11.2004, str.
Is disappointed at the Commission's negative reaction to paragraph 123 in the 2002 Commission discharge resolution of 21 April 2004 OJ L 330, 4.11.2004, p.
, ki se glasi: "... da Komisija dopušča, da je blago nepopolno ali nepravilno prijavljeno in ni dano v tranzitni postopek, kar onemogoča izplačilo varščine in je treba dokumente poslati nazaj v državo, iz katere je blago prišlo v EU in da to hromi kampanjo boja proti goljufijam; ..."; ponovno poziva Komisijo, da nemudoma preneha z izvajanjem te prakse in predlaga ustrezne spremembe Carinskega zakonika;
, which states "... that the Commission allows goods which have been incorrectly or falsely declared to be regarded as not being involved in the transit procedure, with the result that the guarantee cannot be reclaimed, that the papers have to be sent back to the country of entry into the EU, and that the campaign to combat fraud is impeded; ..."; calls again on the Commission to put an immediate end to this practice and to propose an appropriate amendment to the Customs Code;
meni, da je naloga Odbora za proračunski nadzor spremljati izdatke EU in, da bi moral ugotavljati, ali se plačila izvajajo v skladu s finančnimi uredbami, ter zastavljati politične cilje; zato Predsedstvu priporoča, da odboru dovoli, da napoti manjše delegacije na misije za raziskavo dejstev tudi v ustrezno utemeljenih primerih, ko bo morala delegacija potovati izven ozemlja Unije;
Is of the opinion that it is the task of the Committee on Budgetary Control to monitor the Union's expenditure and that it should be able to determine whether payments are made in accordance with the financial regulations and to set political aims; therefore recommends that the Bureau authorise that Committee to send small delegations of its members on fact-finding missions even where, in duly justified cases, those missions are required to travel outside the Union's territory;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču, Računskemu sodišču, nadzornemu organu OLAF in OLAF.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the OLAF Supervisory Committee and OLAF.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Evropskemu svetu in Svetu o akcijskem načrtu Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu ( 2004/2214(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation to the European Council and the Council on the EU anti-terrorism Action Plan ( 2004/2214(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga vlaga Antoine Duquesne v imenu skupine ALDE o revidiranem akcijskem načrtu/delovnem programu Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu ( B6-0071/2004 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council submitted by Antoine Duquesne on behalf of the ALDE Group on the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Work Programme ( B6-0071/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, predvsem členov I-3, I-2, I-9, II-62, II-63, II-64, II-67, II-82, II-107, II-108, II-109, II-110,III-257, III-261, III-271, III-272, III-273, III-275 in III-276,
having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, and in particular Articles I-3, I-2, I-9, II-62, II-63, II-64, II-67, II-82, II-107, II-108, II-109, II-110, III-257, III-261, III-271, III-272, III-273, III 274, III-275 and III-276,
ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 ter naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
having regard to Articles 6 and 7 and Title V of the Treaty on European Union,
ob upoštevanju naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, zlasti členov 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39 in 42 Pogodbe,
having regard to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union and in particular Articles 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 39 and 42,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, podpisane 4. novembra 1950 v Rimu in spremenjene s Protokolom št. 11, zlasti členov 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 in 10 Konvencije,
having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950, as amended by Protocol No. 11 and in particular Articles 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 10,
ob upoštevanju Splošne deklaracije o človekovih pravicah, podpisane 10. decembra 1948, zlasti členov 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13 in 19 Deklaracije,
having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed on 10 December 1948 and in particular Articles 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13 and 19,
ob upoštevanju dvanajstih konvencij Združenih narodov o boju proti terorizmu,
having regard to the twelve UN anti-terrorism Conventions,
ob upoštevanju Rimskega statuta Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča, ki ga je 17. julija 1998 sprejela diplomatska konferenca Združenih narodov,
having regard to the Statute of Rome of the International Criminal Court adopted on 17 July 1998 by the UN Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries,
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta za boj proti terorizmu, sprejetega 21. septembra 2001 na izrednem Evropskem svetu v Bruslju,
having regard to the action plan to combat terrorism adopted by the extraordinary European Council in Brussels on 21 September 2001,
ob upoštevanju izjav voditeljev držav in vlad na neuradnem srečanju 19. oktobra 2001 v Gentu,
having regard to the declarations of the informal meeting of Heads of State and Government in Ghent on 19 October 2001,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001 v Laekenu,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Laeken on 14 and 15 December 2001,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ z dne 28. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala UL L 63, 6.3.2002, str.
having regard to the Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002 setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime OJ L 63, 6.3.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu UL L 164, 22.6.2002, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/465/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o ustanovitvi skupnih preiskovalnih skupin UL L 162, 20.6.2002, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/465/JHA of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams OJ L 162, 20.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvrševanju sklepov o zamrznitvi lastnine ali dokazov v Evropski uniji UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 25. in 26. marca 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 25 and 26 March 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepnih ugotovitev mednarodnega vrha o demokraciji, terorizmu in varnosti, ki ga je organiziral Madridski klub v španskem glavnem mestu med 8. in 11. marcem 2005,
having regard to the conclusions of the International Summit on Democracy, Terrorism and Security, organised by the Club of Madrid and held in the Spanish capital from 8 to 11 March 2005,
ob upoštevanju izjave Evropskega sveta z dne 25. marca 200 o boju proti terorizmu,
having regard to the declaration of the European Council of 25 March 2004 on combating terrorism,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 17. in 18. junija 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 17 and 18 June 2004,
ob upoštevanju spremenjenega akcijskega načrta/delovnega programa Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju z dne 17. in 18. junija 2004,
having regard to the revised EU anti-terrorism Action Plan/Roadmap adopted by the European Council at its meeting of 17 and 18 June 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju Haaškega programa za krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji UL C 53, 3.3.2005, str.
having regard to the Hague Programme strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union OJ C 53, 3.3.2005, p.
, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet na zasedanju v Bruslju z dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
, adopted by the European Council in Brussels on 4 and 5 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 16. in 17. decembra 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the European Council in Brussels on 16 and 17 December 2004,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0164/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0164/2005 ),
ker so človekove pravice brezpogojne, neodtujljive in neprenosljive in ker je najpomembnejša naloga demokracije zaščita svobode in temeljnih pravic državljanov ter ker boj proti terorizmu ne utemeljuje priprave zakonodaje, ki bi lahko imela posledice v nasprotju s tem ciljem,
whereas human rights are non-negotiable, indivisible and non-transferable, and the most important task of democracy is to protect the freedom and the fundamental rights of the citizens, and whereas in the interests of the fight against terrorism, no legislation should be drawn up which may have consequences running counter to that objective,
ker ravno terorizem ogroža temeljne svoboščine, spodbuja usodno socialno razdelitev in je njegov namen nasilno uničiti demokracijo preko ustvarjanja ozračja ogroženosti, v katerem je kratena pravica ljudi do življenja v miru in svobodi,
whereas terrorism, on the other hand, attacks fundamental freedoms, leads to harmful polarisation and seeks to destroy democracy itself by violent means, creating a climate destroying people's right to live in peace and freedom,
ker teroristična dejanja, ne glede na obliko, večinoma predstavljajo neposreden napad na pravice in svoboščine državljanov, kot so priznane v Splošni deklaraciji o človekovih pravicah, na demokracijo in pravno državo,
whereas terrorist acts, in whatever form, are essentially a direct attack on citizens' rights and freedoms, as set out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and on democracy and the rule of law,
ker je terorizem ena izmed najhujših groženj proti demokraciji in ena izmed glavnih težav, s katero se srečujejo evropski državljani, ter ker je nevaren napad na svoboščine iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
whereas terrorism is one of the most serious threats to democracy and one of the main problems facing European citizens, and whereas it seriously undermines the freedoms protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ker grožnja s terorizmom ni omejena le na določeno zemljepisno območje, saj se teroristi za izvajanje nasilja in ustrahovanja lahko poslužujejo čezmejnih mrež ter lahko hkrati sprožijo uničujoče posledice v različnih državah;
whereas the threat of terrorism today is not limited to specific geographical areas, as terrorist organisations can use crossborder networks to carry out their acts of violence and terror, networks which are capable of having devastating effects in different countries at the same time,
ker se nobena od držav članic ne more sama spopasti s terorizmom in ker je potrebna skupna vzajemna politika boja proti terorizmu,
whereas no Member State can fight terrorism by itself, and a joint interoperational anti-terrorism policy is needed,
ker je za boj proti terorizmu potrebno uporabiti vse instrumente pravne države in Evropske unije,
whereas the fight against terrorism requires the use of all the instruments of the rule of law and of the European Union,
ker se morajo politične strategije EU na področju notranje in zunanje varnosti druga drugo dopolnjevati in morajo biti skladne ter ker se mora to kazati v delovanju njenih institucij,
whereas the EU's internal and external security policies should be complementary and coherent, and this should be reflected in the functioning of its institutions,
ker v Evropi in po svetu obstajajo različne oblike terorizma, zaradi česar je nujno sprejeti specifične ukrepe za učinkovit boj proti njim,
whereas the fact that different forms of terrorism coexist in Europe and throughout the world makes it essential for specific measures to be taken to combat each form effectively,