natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Rusko federacijo, da kot članica Sveta Evrope izboljša razmere, v katerih živijo zaporniki, in da preneha oteževati dostop odvetnikov do nekaterih med njimi; poudarja, da bi morali biti zaporniki v skladu z ruskim kazenskim zakonikom zaprti blizu svojega prebivališča ali blizu mesta, kjer je potekal sodni postopek, kot se je izkazalo v primeru zapornikov Mihaila in Platona;
Urges the Russian Federation, as a member of the Council of Europe, to improve conditions for prisoners and put an end to the difficulties faced by lawyers in seeking to gain access to some of those prisoners; points out that, pursuant to the Russian Criminal Code, detainees should be imprisoned either close to their residence or close to where their trial took place, as exemplified by the prisoners Mr Khodorkovsky and Mr Lebedev;
poziva, da se v novem sporazumu, ki bo sledil po izteku Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, okrepi dialog o človekovih pravicah ter omogoči nastanek dobro strukturiranega in bolj preglednega instrumenta za napredek v smeri skupne politike človekovih pravic;
Calls on the partners to enhance the Human Rights Dialogue in the new agreement, following the expiration of the PCA, into a well structured and more transparent instrument for progress towards a common human rights policy;
pričakuje, da bo obstoječa različica Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki se izteče leta 2007 in se ukvarja tudi s človekovimi pravicami in državljanskimi svoboščinami, temelj novega sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, in pozdravlja dogovor, dosežen na vrhu, da bo sedanji sporazum o partnerstvu in sodelovanju veljal do začetka veljavnosti novega sporazuma;
Expects that the existing version of the PCA, which expires in 2007 and focuses also on human rights and civil liberties, will be the foundation of the new PCA and welcomes the agreement reached at the summit that the current PCA will remain valid until the new agreement enters into force;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom državam članicam, predsedniku in parlamentu Ruske federacije, OVSE ter Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the President and Parliament of the Russian Federation, the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
(Osnutek izvedbene direktive in Osnutek izvedbene uredbe),
(respectively, Draft Implementing Directive and Draft Implementing Regulation),
ob upoštevanju neuradnih osnutkov izvedbenih ukrepov, ki jih je od 6. februarja 2006 prejel Evropski parlament,
having regard to the informal drafts of the implementing measures transmitted to the Parliament since 6 February 2006,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
having regard to Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave, ki jo je 5. februarja 2002 Evropskemu parlamentu podal predsednik Komisije Romano Prodi GOVOR/02/44.
having regard to the statement made to the Parliament by Commission President Romano Prodi on 5 February 2002 SPEECH/02/44.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. februarja 2002 o izvajanju zakonodaje o finančnih storitvah UL C 284 E, 21.11.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 5 February 2002 on the implementation of financial services legislation OJ C 284 E, 21.11.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 64 Direktive 2004/39/ES, ki opredeljuje klavzulo o časovni omejitvi,
having regard to Article 64 of Directive 2004/39/EC: the 'sunset clause' provision,
ob upoštevanju predlaganih sprememb k osnutku izvedbenih ukrepov, ki jih je Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve sprejel 30. maja 2006,
having regard to the proposed modifications of the draft implementing measures adopted by its Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs on 30 May 2006,
ob upoštevanju izida zasedanja Odbora za vrednostne papirje z dne 8. in 9. junija 2006,
having regard to the outcome of the meeting of the European Securities Committee of 8 and 9 June 2006,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta (Ekonomske in finančne zadeve) z dne 5. maja 2006, v katerih je poudarjen pomen nadzora, usklajevanja in zbliževanja znotraj Evropske unije,
having regard to the Council (Economic and Financial Affairs) conclusions of 5 May 2006, stressing the importance of supervision, coordination and convergence within the European Union,
ob upoštevanju člena 103(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker člen 47 Pogodbe ES, ki je pravna podlaga Direktive 2004/39/ES, izrecno ne opredeljuje določb o izvedbenih ukrepih; ker Parlament ob upoštevanju cilja boljše ureditve in resnično enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za finančne trge na splošno podpira uporabo izvedbenih ukrepov,
whereas Article 47 of the EC Treaty, which is the legal basis of Directive 2004/39/EC, makes no express provision for implementing measures; whereas the Parliament, bearing in mind the objectives of better regulation and enforcement on a truly level playing field for financial markets, generally supports the use of implementing measures,
poziva Komisijo, naj se čim bolj drži pooblastil, ki so ji bila dodeljena z Direktivo 2004/39/ES, v skladu z veljavnimi določbami iz Pogodbe ES, s čimer bo zagotovljena pravna varnost za udeležence na finančnem trgu;
Asks the Commission to take the utmost account of the limits on its powers conferred by Directive 2004/39/EC, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the EC Treaty, in order to ensure legal certainty for financial market players;
poudarja, da je osnutek izvedbenih ukrepov učinkovita rešitev za dosego ciljev izboljšanih pogojev poslovanja za investicijske družbe in druga mesta trgovanja ter učinkovitih, preglednih in varnih finančnih trgov v EU;
Points out that the draft implementing measures constitute a workable solution for achieving the objectives of improved operating conditions for investment firms and other trading bodies as well as of efficient, transparent and secure financial markets in the EU;
poudarja, da je delo, ki ga je Parlament opravljal od objave izvedbenih ukrepov, izviralo iz potrebe po spoštovanju zakonskih določb, katerih namen je zagotovitev uravnoteženega izida med konkurenčnostjo in preglednostjo za finančne trge, interesne skupine (delničarji, izdajatelji in uporabniki), regulativne organe in demokratično izvoljene predstavnike;
Stresses that the work undertaken by Parliament since the publication of the implementing measures has been stimulated by the need to respect those legislative provisions aimed at achieving a balanced outcome between competition and transparency for financial markets, stakeholders (shareholders, issuers and users), regulatory authorities, and democratically elected representatives;
pozdravlja pripravljenost Komisije v sodelovanju s Parlamentom za zagotovitev kar najboljših dosežkov za vse vpletene stranke; ponovno opozarja, da je treba parlament od najzgodnejše faze naprej vključiti v delo znotraj odbora ter ga o njem obveščati;
Welcomes the willingness that the Commission has demonstrated in working with Parliament towards achieving the best possible outcome for all parties concerned; recalls the need for the Commission to involve and inform Parliament from the earliest stages of the committee work;
ugotavlja, da postopek v zvezi s sprejetjem izvedbenih ukrepov do sedaj tako rekoč ni obstajal in odstopa od običajnega razvojem zakonodaje ES; zato poudarja, da je treba doseči rezultate, ki bodo zadovoljili vse zadevne institucije v prid pozitivnega razvoja medinstitucionalnih odnosov;
Notes that the procedure regarding the adoption of implementing measures is almost unprecedented and detracts from the usual development of EC legislation; points, therefore, to the need to achieve a mutually satisfactory outcome for all institutions concerned in order to develop the inter-institutional relationship positively;
opozarja, da ne glede na splošno sodelovanje med institucijami EU obstajajo strukturne pomanjkljivosti načina podeljevanja pooblastil Komisiji, ki lahko ogrozi zaključek pomembnih zakonodajnih besedil, kot so izvedbeni ukrepi;
Points out that, despite the generally cooperative approach amongst EU institutions, there are structural deficiencies in the way in which the delegation of legislative powers to the Commission occurs, which are capable of jeopardising the outcome of important regulation such as the implementing measures;
izraža pripravljenost za nadaljnje izboljševanje medinstitucionalnih odnosov v različnih področjih politike in zlasti znotraj postopka Lamfalussy, da bo zagotovljena trajna rešitev, s katero bodo zadovoljne vse strani in bo Parlamentu zagotovila enakovreden položaj s Svetom pri odvzemu zakonodajnih pooblastil;
Signals its willingness to continue to improve the functioning of the inter-institutional relationship across the whole range of policy areas, and especially within the Lamfalussy process, with a view to reaching a lasting and mutually satisfactory solution, which puts Parliament on an equal footing with the Council when calling back the delegation of legislative powers;
ugotavlja, da je treba okrepiti vlogo Odbora evropskih regulativnih organov s področja vrednostnih papirjev (CESR) pri usklajevanju dejavnosti nacionalnih regulativnih organov in z namenom spodbujanja ureditvenega zbliževanja ter njegovo vlogo nepogrešljivega ključnega svetovalca na evropski ravni za zadeve, ki so v sklopu njegovih pooblastil;
Notes the importance of consolidating the role of the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) in coordinating the activities of national regulators and with a view to promoting regulatory convergence, and as the indispensable key advisor at European level for issues falling within its competence;
ugotavlja, da je treba zato o usklajevanju dejavnosti nacionalnih nadzornikov na splošno razpravljati znotraj CESR; ugotavlja, da se to zlasti nanaša na:
Remarks that coordinated activity between the competent national authorities should therefore be generally subject to discussion within the CESR; notes that this particularly concerns the following matters:
oblikovanje in vzpostavitev ureditev za izmenjavo podatkov o poslovnih dogodkih med pristojnimi nacionalnimi organi, kot zahteva Direktiva 2004/39/ES v skladu s členom 13(1) Osnutka izvedbene uredbe,
the design and establishment of arrangements for the exchange of transaction information between the competent authorities as required by Directive 2004/39/EC in accordance with Article 13(1) of the Draft Implementing Regulation,
določitev najbolj ustreznega trga v smislu likvidnosti ali njegovih alternativ ter razpravljanje o tem med ustreznimi nacionalnimi organi v skladu s členoma 8 in 9 Osnutka izvedbene uredbe in resolucijo o morebitnih konfliktih glede omenjenih vprašanj med ustreznimi organi;
the determination and the discussion between competent authorities of the most relevant market in terms of liquidity or its alternative in accordance with Articles 8 and 9 of the Draft Implementing Regulation, and the resolution of potential conflicts on such issues between the competent authorities;
poudarja, da v sedanji fazi CESR nima zadosti operativnih sredstev, da bi lahko učinkovito opravljal svojo nalogo;
Emphasises that, at the current stage, the CESR lacks the operational means to fulfil its role effectively;
poziva države članice, naj CESR zagotovijo potrebna sredstva za začetek veljavnosti Direktive 2004/39/ES in njenih izvedbenih ukrepov;
Calls on Member States to provide the CESR with the means necessary to put into effect Directive 2004/39/EC and its implementing measures;
poziva države članice, naj okrepijo demokratično odgovornost CESR, zlasti nasproti Parlamentu;
Calls on Member States to strengthen the democratic accountability of the CESR, in particular towards the Parliament;
meni, da so sedanja izvedbeni ukrepi najboljši možni izid za vse vpletene strani;
Takes the view that, as they currently stand, the implementing measures comprise the best achievable outcome for all parties concerned;
sprejema izvedbene ukrepe;
Approves of the implementing measures;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in CESR.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the CESR.
ob upoštevanju Strategije trajnostnega razvoja (STR), ki jo je sprejel Göteburški Evropski svet dne 15. in 16. junija 2001 in Johannesburškega akcijskega programa, ki ga je sprejel Svetovni vrh o trajnostnem razvoju leta 2002,
having regard to the Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) adopted by the Göteborg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001 and to the Johannesburg Action Programme adopted by the World Summit on Sustainable Development in 2002,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o "Pregledu strategije trajnostnega razvoja: Izhodišča za ukrepanje" ( KOM(2005)0658 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on 'the Review of the Sustainable Development Strategy: A Platform for Action' ( COM(2005)0658 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva bruseljskega Evropskega sveta z dne 16. in 17. junija 2005 in svojih predhodnih resolucij o zadevi,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 16 and 17 June 2005, and its own previous resolutions on the matter,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor Komisiji in Svetu,
having regard to the questions for oral answer to the Commission and the Council,
ob upoštevanju nadaljnjih nevzdržnih trendov na mnogih področjih, kot so raba zemljišč in zemeljskih virov, prevoz, podnebne spremembe, ribištvo, uporaba fosilnih goriv ter izkoriščanje biološke raznovrstnosti,
having regard to the persistence of unsustainable trends in many areas, such as land use and land resources, transport, climate change, fisheries, use of fossil fuels and depletion of biodiversity,
ob poudarjanju pomena treh osrednjih ciljev, ki se nanašajo na varstvo okolja, družbeno enakost in kohezijo ter gospodarsko blaginjo, in ob upoštevanju potrebe, da se te tri komponente trajnostnega razvoja ustrezno vključijo in izvajajo na ravni EU in svetovni ravni,
emphasising the importance of the three central and related objectives of environmental protection, social equity and cohesion and economic prosperity, and having regard to the need to ensure that these three components of sustainable development are properly integrated and implemented at EU and world levels,
ob poudarjanju potrebe po preusmeritvi kulture k družbi, ki bo temeljila na načelih trajnostnega razvoja, z zahtevo po dolgoročnih politikah, katerih cilj je ločitev gospodarske rasti od uporabe naravnih virov,
emphasising the need for a shift in culture towards a society based on sustainable development principles, requiring policies of a long-term nature aimed at decoupling economic growth from use of natural resources,
ker velik del evropskega prebivalstva še naprej trpi zaradi gospodarskih in socialnih problemov, kot so revščina, brezposelnost in socialna izključenost, in ker večina socialno prikrajšanih pogosto živi v najslabših razmerah glede njihovega družbenega okolja, vključno s slabimi stanovanjskimi razmerami in slabim zdravjem; tudi ob upoštevanju korenitih demografskih sprememb v EU in nasprotnih trendih v najmanj razvitih državah,
whereas a significant proportion of the European population continues to suffer severe economic and social problems, such as poverty, unemployment and social exclusion and whereas the most socially deprived people often experience the worst conditions in terms of their social environment, including poor housing and health; having regard also to the dramatic demographic changes in the EU and the converse trends in the least developed countries,
Pomanjkanje ambicij
Lack of ambition
izraža razočaranje zaradi pomanjkanja napredka pri razvoju in spremljanju STR, ki je bila sprejeta v Göteburgu leta 2001;
Expresses its disappointment at the lack of progress in developing and following up the SDS adopted in Göteborg in 2001;
meni, da je izhodišče Komisije za ukrepanje pri pregledu STR preveč previdno in neprepričljivo, tako da v sedanji obliki ne bo moglo pridobiti javnega mnenja in oblikovalcev politike za pomembne prihodnje naloge;
Considers that the Commission's platform for action on the review of the SDS is overly cautious and weak, and in its present form will not succeed in mobilising public opinion and policy-makers behind the vital tasks that lie ahead;
pozdravlja koristno delo in prizadevanje avstrijskega predsedstva za oživitev STR s spodbujanjem predlogov Komisije za združevanje obstoječih ciljev in kazalcev v enoten in skladnejši okvir ter s predlaganjem nekaterih novih konceptov;
Welcomes, however, the valuable work of the Austrian Presidency in seeking to relaunch the SDS, in strengthening the proposals from the Commission, in pulling together existing targets and indicators within a single and more coherent framework, and also in attempting to put forward some new concepts;
Povezava z Lizbonsko strategijo
Link with the Lisbon Strategy
meni, da je sprejetje medsektorskih strategij, kakor so bile sprejete v Cardiffu, Lizboni in Göteborgu brez pomena, če jim ne sledi skladen in dosleden skupni proces;
Considers that the adoption of cross-cutting strategies such as those adopted in Cardiff, Lisbon and Göteborg is only of value if it is followed by a coherent and consistent overarching process;
ugotavlja, da bi morali biti okoljski cilji v Lizbonski strategiji tako pomembni kot konkurenčnost in ustvarjanje delovnih mest, v STR pa bi morala trajnostni gospodarski razvoj in zmanjšanje revščine predstavljati enako pomembni nalogi kot okoljski cilji;
Notes that in the Lisbon Strategy environmental objectives ought to be as important as competitiveness and job creation while in the SDS economic sustainability and poverty reduction ought to be priorities as important as environmental goals;
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da imata nova STR in Lizbonska strategija številne značilnosti, ki se dopolnjujejo, kot so skupni cilji večje konkurenčnosti, ustvarjanja več in kakovostnejših delovnih mest, večje socialne vključenosti, varstva okolja in preprečevanja tveganj;
Notes, in this context, the many complementary features of the new SDS and the Lisbon Strategy, such as their common goals of improved competitiveness, the creation of more and better-quality jobs, greater social inclusion, environmental protection and risk prevention;
predlaga izvedbo konkretnih ukrepov, ki bodo zagotovili, da bo njihovo izvajanje pravočasno in ustrezno, zlasti z združljivimi postopki spremljanja in pregleda;
Suggests that concrete steps be taken to ensure that their implementation is timely and properly coordinated, notably by means of compatible monitoring and review procedures;
poleg tega kot konkreten korak k učinkovitemu usklajevanju Lizbonske strategije in STR predlaga, da se potrebno preoblikovanje energetskih in transportnih sistemov, ki mora temeljiti na ločitvi potrebe po energiji od gospodarske rasti in na prehodu k okolju prijaznim oblikam prevoza – ključni cilj STR – uporabi kot vzvod za dvig rasti, zaposlenosti in izvoza v okviru Lizbonske strategije;
Suggests, moreover, as a concrete step towards effective coordination of the Lisbon and SDS Strategies, that the necessary transformation of the energy and transport systems, which has to be based on decoupling energy demand from economic growth and on modal shift towards environmentally friendly transport modes - a key objective of the SDS - should be used as a lever to boost growth, employment and exports within the Lisbon Strategy;
poleg tega ugotavlja, da bi morala sklep spomladanskega Evropskega sveta 2006 o letnem pregledu energetskega vprašanja na spomladanskem Evropskem svetu in delo v zvezi s tem ustrezati širšemu okviru STR in Lizbonskega procesa;
Notes, moreover, the decision of the 2006 Spring European Council to hold an energy review annually at the Spring European Council, and that work on this should also fit into the wider framework of the SDS and of the Lisbon Process;
Krepitev strategije
Reinforcing the Strategy
ugotavlja, da je dobra stran pojma "trajnostni razvoj" v tem, da vsebuje medsektorski gospodarski, socialni in okoljski cilj; poleg tega meni, da mora biti glede na različne razlage kolikor je mogoče jasen;
Notes that the term 'sustainable development' has the advantage of being a truly cross-cutting economic, social and environmental objective; considers, moreover, that it needs to be made as precise as possible in the light of the different interpretations of the term;
se v tem pogledu strinja s sedmimi ključnimi vprašanji, ki naj bi bila vključena v revidirano STR (podnebne spremembe in čistejši viri energije, javno zdravje, socialna izključenost, demografija in migracije, upravljanje naravnih virov, trajnostne oblike prevoza, revščina v svetovnem merilu in razvojni izzivi);
Concurs, in this context, with the seven key issues that have been put forward for inclusion within a revised SDS (climate change and cleaner energy, public health, social exclusion, demography and migration, management of natural resources, sustainable transport, global poverty and development challenges);
zahteva, da Komisija preuči cilje in naloge ter zagotovi, da bodo ti čim bolj ambiciozni, in tudi da zagotovi njihovo izmerljivost in specifičnost, kar bo omogočilo natančno in podrobno oceno napredka;
Requests that the Commission review the objectives and targets to ensure the highest possible level of ambition and ensure that they are measurable and specific in order to enable a precise and detailed evaluation of progress to be carried out;
poudarja pomen vprašanj javnega zdravja in varstva biološke raznovrstnosti glede na ambiciozen cilj reverzibilnosti izgube biološke raznovrstnosti v Evropi in svetu do leta 2010 in predlaga, da se ju doda bodisi kot novo ključno vprašanje v STR ali se jima vsaj nameni poseben poudarek v posebnem poglavju o zdravju in upravljanju naravnih virov;
Emphasises the importance of public health issues and protecting biodiversity in the light of the ambitious objective of reversing by 2010 the loss of biodiversity in Europe and the world, and suggests that these either be added as a new key issue within the SDS or, at least, be given special emphasis within specific sections on health and management of natural resources;
poudarja pomembnost enakosti spolov pri trajnostnem razvoju; poudarja, da skupnih ciljev Lizbonske strategije in STR ni mogoče doseči brez reševanja trenutnih neenakosti ter boljše uporabe potencialov tako moških kakor tudi žensk; zato poudarja, da je treba socialno vključenost razumeti v njenem najširšem pomenu, vključno z vidikom spolov;
Emphasises the importance of gender equality in sustainable development; underlines the fact that the common goals of the Lisbon Strategy and the SDS cannot be attained without addressing current inequalities and making better use of the potential of both men and women; underlines, therefore, the fact that social inclusion must be understood in its broadest sense, including the gender dimension;