natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zato je Komisija zunanjemu izvajalcu naročila študijo, v kateri naj bi ta opredelil glavne vzroke za nezadostno črpanje sredstev in predlagal načine za njihovo odpravo.
For that reason, the Commission launched a study by an external contractor to identify the main reasons for this under-absorption and to suggest ways to address it.
Študija bo kmalu končana, nekatere ugotovitve pa bodo veljale za vse države članice in ne samo za nove.
This study is now being finalised and some of its conclusions will be valid for all Member States and not only to the newest ones.
Komisija bo natančno preučila priporočila, ki jih bo pripravil zunanji izvajalec, in nekatere med njimi posredovala nacionalnim organom v državah članicah ter sprejela ukrepe v skladu z uredbo o LIFE+, s katerimi bo izboljšala razdelitev sredstev med državami članicami.
The Commission will analyse carefully the recommendations that will be made by the external contractor, some of which will be addressed to the national authorities in the Member States, and take the measures that, being compatible with the LIFE+ Regulation, would allow for an improved distribution of the budget among the Member States.
Medtem je Komisija v ta namen že sprejela nekatere ukrepe.
In the meantime, the Commission has already taken some measures in this sense.
Od leta 2007 v vseh državah članicah vsako leto organizira informativne seminarje o LIFE+ v njihovih nacionalnih jezikih.
Since 2007, the Commission has organised, each year and in each Member State, information sessions on LIFE+ in the national language(s).
Te delavnice so namenjene morebitnim vlagateljem, ki morda ne vedo, da obstaja poseben finančni instrument EU za sofinanciranje na področju okolja.
The aim of these workshops is to reach potential applicants who might not know about the availability of an EU funding instrument specifically dedicated to the environment.
Nudile naj bi tudi izobraževanje za nacionalne kontaktne točke uprav držav članic, da bi lahko te bolje pomagale morebitnim vlagateljem pri pripravi dobrih predlogov.
It also intends to provide training for the national contact points in the Member States' administrations, so that they are in a better position to assist potential applicants in preparing good-quality proposals.
Komisija vsako leto pripravi tudi natančne smernice za pripravo predlogov in njihovo ocenjevanje.
Finally, the Commission produces every year a full set of detailed guidelines for the preparation of proposals and for their evaluation.
Te smernice in obrazci za predložitev predlogov so na voljo na spletni strani LIFE: http://ec.europa.eu/life.
These guidelines, together with the submission forms, are available on the LIFE web page, under http://ec.europa.eu/life.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-010165/2010
Question for written answer E-010165/2010
Člen 117 poslovnika
Rule 117
Pino Arlacchi (S&D) in Ivo Vajgl (ALDE)
Pino Arlacchi (S&D) and Ivo Vajgl (ALDE)
Zadeva: Položaj iraških pripornikov
Subject: Condition of Iraqi detainees
Glede na dokumente, ki jih je 22. oktobra 2010 objavil Wikileaks, so vojaške sile ZDA v Iraku domnevno predale iraškim silam pripornike, čeprav so se zavedale, da bodo morda mučeni.
According to documents published by Wikileaks on 22 October 2010, US forces in Iraq may have handed over detainees to their Iraqi counterparts, knowing that there was a risk they could be tortured.
Glavni preiskovalec ZN proti mučenju Manfred Nowak je izjavil, da je vlada ZDA dolžna raziskati vse obtožbe o zlorabi, v kolikor ti dokumenti vsebujejo morebitne dokaze o kršenju konvencije Združenih narodov proti mučenju.
The UN's chief investigator on torture, Manfred Nowak, has stated that if these documents contain possible evidence of violation of the UN Convention Against Torture, then it is the responsibility of the US Government to investigate any allegations of abuse.
Če tega ne bi storila, bi to pomenilo, da Obamova administracija ne priznava svojih obveznosti po mednarodnem pravu.
Not doing so would represent a failure of the Obama administration to recognise its obligations under international law.
Zato bi bilo primerno ukrepati na mednarodni ravni.
It would therefore be opportune to take action at international level.
Bo Svet pozval ZN, naj sprožijo neodvisno preiskavo za ugotavljanje vseh dejstev?
Will the Council call on the UN to set up an independent investigation in order to ascertain all the facts?
Bo Svet v primeru, da preiskava potrdi zlorabe pripornikov, pomagal privesti storilce pred sodišče in zagotovil, da žrtve prejmejo ustrezno odškodnino?
If this investigation confirms the abuses against detainees, will the Council help bring the perpetrators to justice and ensure that the victims receive adequate compensation?
Svet še ni razpravljal o navedenih poslanskih vprašanjih.
The Council has not discussed the specific issues raised by the Honourable Member.
Smernice EU proti mučenju seveda jasno nasprotujejo takšnemu ravnanju kot enemu najbolj gnusnih kršitev človekovih pravic in nedvoumno zagovarjajo stališče, da nihče ne bi smel biti izpostavljen mučenju ali krutemu, nečloveškemu ali ponižujočemu ravnanju.
However, the EU guidelines against torture make clear that torture is among the most abhorrent violations of human rights and that no-one should be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
Smernice določajo, da bo EU v svojih odnosih s tretjimi državami odločno zagovarjala, da morajo vse države upoštevati ustrezne mednarodne predpise in standarde glede mučenja in ravnati v skladu z njimi, ter poudarjala, da sta mučenje in grdo ravnanje po mednarodnem pravu prepovedana.
The guidelines state that in its contacts with third countries the EU will express the imperative need for all countries to adhere to and comply with the relevant international norms and standards concerning torture and emphasise that torture and ill-treatment are forbidden under international law.
Poleg tega je EU v skladu s smernicami dolžna pozivati tretje države k boju proti nekaznovanju, ki naj se ga lotijo s hitrimi, nepristranskimi in učinkovitimi preiskavami vseh primerov domnevnega mučenja.
Moreover, the guidelines task the EU to call on third countries to combat impunity by conducting prompt, impartial and effective investigations of all allegations of torture.
Ukrepanje EU proti mučenju temelji na načelih iz navedenih smernic.
EU action against torture is based on the principles set out in these guidelines.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-010166/2010
Question for written answer E-010166/2010
Bo Komisija pozvala ZN, naj sprožijo neodvisno preiskavo za ugotavljanje vseh dejstev?
Will the Commission call on the UN to set up an independent investigation in order to ascertain all the facts?
Bo Komisija v primeru, da preiskava potrdi zlorabe pripornikov, pomagala privesti storilce pred sodišče in zagotovila, da žrtve prejmejo ustrezno odškodnino?
If this investigation confirms the abuses against detainees, will the Commission help bring the perpetrators to justice and ensure that the victims receive adequate compensation?
Odgovor visoke predstavnice in podpredsednice Catherine Ashton v imenu Komisije
Answer given by High Representative/Vice‑President Ashton on behalf of the Commission
V smernicah EU proti mučenju je navedeno, da mučenje sodi med najhujše kršitve človekovih pravic in da nihče ne bi smel biti izpostavljen mučenju ali krutemu, nečloveškemu ali ponižujočemu ravnanju.
The EU guidelines against torture state that torture is among the most abhorrent violations of human rights and that no one should be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
V njih je tudi točno določeno, da bo EU v svojih odnosih s tretjimi državami odločno zagovarjala, da morajo vse države upoštevati ustrezne mednarodne predpise in standarde glede mučenja in ravnati v skladu z njimi, ter poudarjala, da sta mučenje in grdo ravnanje po mednarodnem pravu prepovedana.
The EU guidelines specify that in its contacts with third countries, the EU will express the need for all countries to adhere to and comply with the relevant international norms and standards concerning torture and emphasise that torture and ill-treatment are forbidden under international law.
Komisija je zaskrbljena zaradi vznemirjujočih trditev v zvezi z mučenjem v zaupnih dokumentih, ki so bili pred nedavnim objavljeni na spletni strani Wikileaks.
The Commission is concerned at the disturbing allegations concerning torture contained in leaked classified documents recently published on the Wikileaks website.
EU se bo skladno s smernicami EU proti mučenju v okviru svojih prihodnjih stikov z organi Združenih držav Amerike in Iraka pozanimala, kakšni ukrepi so bili sprejeti za raziskavo domnevnega mučenja pripornikov, ter zahtevala, da se vsakdo, osumljen umora, mučenja ali grdega ravnanja, privede pred sodišče.
In future contacts with the United States and Iraqi authorities, in line with the EU guidelines against torture, the EU will enquire what steps are being taken to investigate allegations that detainees have been tortured, and urge that anyone suspected of murder, torture or ill-treatment be brought to justice before a court of law.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-010329/2010
Question for written answer E-010329/2010
Debora Serracchiani (S&D) , Ismail Ertug (S&D) in Tanja Fajon (S&D)
Debora Serracchiani (S&D) , Ismail Ertug (S&D) and Tanja Fajon (S&D)
Zadeva: Letalski klub Treviso
Subject: ‘Aeroclub di Treviso’
Na letališču v Trevisu je lokalni letalski klub „Aeroclub“ na svojo ograjo namestil reprodukcijo napisa nad vhodom v Auschwitz, pri čemer je stavek „Delo osvobaja“ spremenil v „Letenje osvobaja“ (Fliegen Macht Frei).
The ‘Aeroclub di Treviso’, located in Italy near Treviso airport, now has above its gates a sign reproducing the words ‘Il volo rende liberi’ (‘Fliegen Macht Frei’ — ‘Flying makes you free’), which are a variant of those associated with the gates of Auschwitz, ‘Il lavoro rende liberi’ (‘Work makes you free’).
Vodstvo letalskega kluba trdi, da se je za takšen ukrep odločilo v znak protesta zoper odločbo vodstva letališča in nacionalne uprave za civilno letalstvo (ENAC – Ente Nazionale per l'Aviazione Civile), da ogradi prostor pred hangarjem, za katerega ima letalski klub koncesijo, s čimer je bil partnerjem onemogočen neposreden dostop do letališke steze.
The Aeroclub management say that they have done this in protest against the decision of the airport authorities and Italy's National Civil Aviation Authority (ENAC) to cordon off the area opposite the hangar which had been conceded to the Aeroclub, thus depriving its members of direct access to the runway.
Tožilstvo Republike Italije v Trevisu je začelo preiskavo o sumu kaznivega dejanja spodbujanja rasizma.
The public prosecutor's office for Treviso has opened an inquiry into whether this can be considered racist propaganda.
Ali namerava Komisija zagotoviti, da se napis čim prej odstrani, ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o neuporabi zastaralnega roka za vojne zločine in zločine zoper človeštvo in Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter dejstva, da se v skladu z mednarodnim pravom zastaralni rok za vojne zločine in zločine zoper človeštvo ne uporablja?
In the light of the UN Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and considering that under international law statutory limitations do not apply to war crimes or crimes against humanity, will the Commission take action to ensure that this offensive sign is removed as soon as possible?
Predvsem pa, ali namerava Komisija sprejeti ukrepe, da bi preprečila in obsodila morebitno ponavljanje podobnega ravnanja na ozemlju EU, in kakšni bodo ti ukrepi?
In particular, can the Commission state what steps it will take to prevent and condemn similar actions throughout the Union?
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-010631/2010
Question for written answer E-010631/2010
Zadeva: Slovenska narodna skupnost v Italiji
Subject: Slovene national community in Italy
16. februarja 2010 sem Evropski komisiji zastavila pisno vprašanje, kako namerava uresničiti določbe Lizbonske pogodbe o varstvu pripadnikov narodnih manjšin v vsej EU.
On 16 February 2010 I tabled a written question to ask the Commission how it would give effect in the EU as a whole to the provisions of the Treaty of Lisbon intended to protect persons belonging to minorities.
Odgovorila je, da bo v okviru svojega mandata zagotavljala spoštovanje temeljnih pravic v pravu EU in njihovo izvajanje v državah članicah.
The Commission answered by indicating that it would exercise its responsibilities in such a way as to ensure that fundamental rights were respected in EC law and as regards their implementation in Member States.
Nadalje je odgovorila, da jo „pri nalogi izvrševanja ključno podpira Agencija za temeljne pravice, ki je odgovorna za zbiranje in analizo zanesljivih ter primerljivih podatkov o teh vprašanjih v državah članicah“.
The reply made the additional point that ‘The Fundamental Rights Agency plays a key role in assisting the Commission in its enforcement task by collecting and analysing reliable and comparable data in the Member States about these issues’.
Dijaki tržaških šol s slovenskim učnim jezikom ne čutijo rezultatov prizadevanja Komisije.
The fruits of the Commission’s labours are not making themselves felt for the pupils of the Trieste schools in which Slovene is the teaching language.
Reforma ministrice za šolstvo, univerze in raziskave, Mariastelle Gelmini, ki je letos stopila v veljavo, namreč resno ogroža njihove šole in izobraževanje v slovenskem jeziku.
The reform drawn up by the Minister for Schools, Universities, and Research, Mariastelle Gelmini, which entered into force this year, poses a real threat to the pupils’ schools and their education in the Slovene language.
Nova reforma bi združila sedanje štiri višje srednje šole v le dve.
Under the new reform, the present four higher secondary schools are to be merged, leaving just two schools.
To je v nasprotju z Londonskim memorandumom iz leta 1954, ki narodni skupnosti zagotavlja določeno število šol.
This is contrary to the 1954 London Memorandum, which lays down a fixed number of schools for the national community.
Tudi v šestem členu italijanske ustave je zapisano, da mora Republika Italija zagotavljati pravice vsem narodnim skupnostim, vključno s slovensko.
In addition, Article 6 of the Italian Constitution requires the Italian Republic to safeguard the rights of all national communities, including the Slovene community.
Dijaki tržaških šol so s protestom javno izrazili svoje nezadovoljstvo, saj se želijo v prihodnosti izobraževati v lastnem jeziku brez omejitev in krčenj.
The Trieste pupils have publicly expressed their dissatisfaction through protest, for they wish to educated in the future in their own language without restrictions or cutbacks.
To je njihova pravica.
That is their right.
Ker se slovenska narodna skupnost v Italiji redno srečuje s težavami, Komisijo sprašujem: 1.
Given that the Slovene community in Italy regularly encounters difficulties: 1.
Ali je Komisija obveščena o težavah, ki jih imajo pripadniki slovenske narodne skupnosti v Italiji? 2.
Is the Commission aware of the difficulties being experienced by the Slovene community in Italy? 2.
Ali je Komisija obveščena o reformah ministrice za šolstvo, univerze in raziskave, Mariastelle Gelmini? 3.
Does it know about the reforms drawn up by the Minister for Schools, Universities, and Research, Mariastelle Gelmini? 3.
Kaj namerava Komisija storiti, da ne bo prišlo do krčenja števila šol v Italiji? 4.
What will the Commission do to prevent the number of schools in Italy from being reduced? 4.
Kaj namerava Komisija ukreniti, da bi preprečila težave slovenske narodne skupnosti v Italiji?
What steps will it take to avert difficulties for the Slovene community in Italy?
PISNO VPRAŠANJE E-2352/10
WRITTEN QUESTION E-2352/10
vlagajo Csaba Sándor Tabajdi (S&D) , Zoran Thaler (S&D) , Eva Lichtenberger (Verts/ALE) in Daciana Octavia Sârbu (S&D)
by Csaba Sándor Tabajdi (S&D) , Zoran Thaler (S&D) , Eva Lichtenberger (Verts/ALE) and Daciana Octavia Sârbu (S&D)
Zadeva: Izgradnja sežigalnice odpadkov v bližini tromeje med Avstrijo, Slovenijo in Madžarsko
Subject: Construction of a waste incinerator next to the Austrian-Slovenian-Hungarian border
Leta 2006 je podjetje Begas, ki ga upravlja zvezna dežela Gradiščanska, predložilo načrte za sežigalnico odpadkov.
In 2006 Begas company, under the control of the state of Burgenland, put forward plans for a waste incineration plant.
Podjetje Begas načrtuje izgradnjo sežigalnice z zmogljivostjo 325.000 ton odpadkov v neposredni bližini tromeje med Avstrijo, Madžarsko in Slovenijo.
Begas plans to build a plant capable of incinerating 325 000 tons of waste right next to the Austrian-Hungarian-Slovenian border.
V načrtih je 100-metrski dimnik in 60 metrov visoka stavba.
Plans include a 100 metre tall chimney and a 60 metre high building.
Zmogljivost sežigalnice bo približno 10-krat večja od letne količine odpadkov na vsem Gradiščanskem, zato je zelo verjetno, da se bodo sem stekali odpadki z zelo oddaljenih lokacij, kar bo povzročilo dodatno obremenitev okolja.
The capacity of the incinerator will be about 10 times higher than the annual waste production of the entire Burgenland region — thus, it is highly probable that waste will be transferred to the plant from great distances, leading to additional environmental stress.
Načrtovana sežigalnica naj bi stala v neposredni bližini treh nacionalnih parkov, ki so vsi območja Natura 2000.
The planned incineration plant is in the immediate proximity of three national parks, all of them Natura 2000 areas.
Zaradi pogostih vetrov bi to lahko škodljivo vplivalo na ta območja, s čimer bi bila kršena načela direktive o habitatih (92/43/EGS UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
Through the prevalent winds this might have harmful effects on them, thus violating the principles of the Habitat Directive (92/43/EEC OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
7 . ), bližnjim madžarskim regijam pa bi bilo oteženo upoštevanje mejnih vrednosti PM10.
7 . ) and making it harder for nearby Hungarian regions to meet the PM 10 limits.
Lokalni prebivalci z obeh strani meje vseskozi protestirajo proti uničevanju krajine in kakovosti zraka.
Local residents from both sides of the border have been constantly protesting against the destruction of the landscape and the air quality.
Ali se Komisija lahko zaveže, da bo zagotavljala spoštovanje načel iz direktiv?
Can the Commission promise to ensure that the principles of the directives also prevail?
Ali bo tiha podpora projektom, ki jih lokalne skupnosti zavračajo, postala splošna praksa Komisije?
Will it become a general practice of the Commission to tacitly support projects that are rejected by local communities?
Ali so omenjeni pogoji načrtovane gradnje v skladu s členoma 1 in 3 direktive 2008/98/ES UL L 312, 22.11.2008, str.
Regarding the aforementioned conditions of the planned construction, is it in accordance with Articles 1 and 3 of Directive 2008/98/EC OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p.
Ravni emisij sežigalnice niso v skladu z načelom najboljše razpoložljive tehnologije, glavnim načelom direktive o industrijskih emisijah, ki je trenutno v drugi obravnavi v Evropskem parlamentu (COD/2007/0286).
The plant's emission rates do not correspond to the principle of Best Available Technology, a chief principle of the Industrial Emissions Directive, currently being considered by the European Parliament at second reading (COD/2007/0286).
Kako Komisija razlaga to načelo in kako bi moralo biti uporabljeno v tem konkretnem primeru?
How does the Commission interpret this principle and how should it be applied in this specific case?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje skladnost projekta z evropskimi vrednotami solidarnosti, čezmejnega sodelovanja in sodelovanja državljanov, glede na to, da so lokalne skupnosti odkrito zavrnile ta projekt in da zvezna dežela Gradiščanska zavrača usklajevanje s sosednjimi državami in regijami?
How does the Commission assess the project's correspondence with European values of solidarity, cross-border cooperation and citizens' participation in the light of the fact that local communities have broadly rejected the project and the state of Burgenland refuses to seek conciliation with neighbouring countries and regions?
Potočnika v imenu Komisije
Answer given by Mr Potočnik on behalf of the Commission
(7. junij 2010)
(7 June 2010)
Peč za sežiganje komunalnih odpadkov, ki jo načrtuje podjetje Begas v deželi Gradiščansko blizu avstrijske meje z Madžarsko in Slovenijo, je bila predmet prejšnjega parlamentarnega vprašanja Komisiji ( P-5609/08 gospoda Olajosa http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB/home.jsp ) in peticije Evropskemu parlamentu (1885/2008).
The municipal waste incinerator planned by the Begas company in the State of Burgenland near the Austrian borders with Hungary and Slovenia has been the subject of a previous parliamentary question to the Commission ( P‑5609/08 by Mr Olajos http://www.europarl.europa.eu/QP-WEB/home.jsp ) and a petition to the European Parliament (1885/2008).
Predvsem je Komisija v svojem sporočilu o peticiji natančno obravnavala skrbi podpisnikov peticije v zvezi s spoštovanjem evropske okoljske zakonodaje, zlasti Direktive Sveta 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje UL L 175, 5.7.1985 . , Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst UL L 206, 22.7.1992 . , Direktive 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov UL L 332, 28.12.2000 . , Direktive 2008/1/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. januarja 2008 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja UL L 24, 29.1.2008 . ter direktiv o kakovosti zraka 96/62/ES UL L 296, 21.11.1996 . , 1999/30/ES UL L 163, 29.6.1999 . in 2008/50/ES UL L 152, 11.6.2008 . .
In particular in its communication addressing the petition the Commission has thoroughly assessed the concerns raised by the petitioner regarding compliance with European environmental legislation, in particular Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment OJ L 175, 5.7.1985. , Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992. , Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste OJ L 332, 28.12.2000. , Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) OJ L 24, 29.1.2008. and the directives on air quality 96/62/EC OJ L 296, 21.11.1996. , 1999/30/EC OJ L 163, 29.6.1999. and 2008/50/EC OJ L 152, 11.6.2008. .
Na podlagi informacij, ki so bile predložene skupaj z navedeno peticijo, Komisija ni ugotovila kršitve okoljske zakonodaje EU.
On the basis of the information provided with the aforementioned petition the Commission could not identify a breach of EU environmental legislation.
V zvezi z direktivo o habitatih je bilo poudarjeno, da člen 6(3) te direktive zahteva, da je pri vsakem načrtu ali projektu, ki ni neposredno povezan z upravljanjem območja Natura 2000 ali zanj potreben, vendar bi lahko pomembno vplival na območje, treba opraviti ustrezno presojo njegovih posledic glede na cilje ohranjanja tega območja.
Concerning the Habitats Directive it was pointed out that Article 6(3) of this directive requires that any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary to the management of a Natura 2000 site, but likely to have a significant effect thereon, shall be subject to appropriate assessment of its implications for the site in view of the site's conservation objectives.
Pristojni nacionalni organi morajo zagotoviti, da se zadevne določbe spoštujejo.
It is for the national competent authorities to ensure that the relevant provisions are respected.