natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
as well as of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
poziva k tesnejšemu in bolj poglobljenemu sodelovanju med nacionalnimi upravami, evropskimi agencijami in skupnimi operativnimi skupinami, in sicer prek specializiranih omrežij (kot so SIS II, VIS, carinski informacijski sistem, Eurodac – sistem za primerjavo prstnih odtisov zaradi učinkovite uporabe Dublinske konvencije – in pravosodne mreže), in k posebnemu sodelovanju med obveščevalnimi in policijskimi službami na nacionalni in evropski ravni v boju proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu; meni, da bi bilo treba poskrbeti za bolj učinkovito evropsko policijsko sodelovanje med vsemi tretjimi državami in državami članicami Evropske unije, in sicer z ustreznimi varovalkami, ki bi zagotavljale ustrezno raven varstva osebnih podatkov;
Calls for closer and more in-depth cooperation between national administrations, European agencies and joint operative teams via specialised networks (such as theSIS II, the VIS, the Customs Information System, Eurodac – a system for the comparison of fingerprints for the effective application of the Dublin Convention – and the judicial networks) and for specific cooperation between intelligence and police services at national and European level in the fight against terrorism and organised crime; considers that more effective European police cooperation should be guaranteed among all third countries and Member States of the European Union with appropriate safeguards ensuring an adequate level of protection of personal data;
obžaluje, da ni bilo napredka pri izvajanju nadgrajenega schengenskega informacijskega sistema II (SIS II) in novega vizumskega informacijskega sistema (VIS), ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj poskrbijo za okrepitev vseh priprav na svojih ravneh, da bi se izognili nadaljnjim zamudam;
Deplores the lack of progress in implementing the upgraded SIS II and the new VIS, and urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that all preparations at their respective levels are reinforced so as to avoid further delays;
poudarja nujnost oblikovanja učinkovitih, trajnostnih in varnih dogovorov glede upravljanja najpomembnejših evropskih sistemov informacijske tehnologije, kot so SIS II, VIS in Eurodac, s čemer bi zagotovili, da se v celoti spoštujejo vsa pravila, ki se pri teh sistemih uporabljajo v zvezi z namenom in pravicami dostopa, varnostjo in predpisi o varstvu podatkov; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je za Evropsko unijo bistven celovit, enoten sklop pravil o zaščiti osebnih podatkov;
Stresses the need to develop efficient, sustainable and secure administrative arrangements for major European IT systems such as SIS II, VIS and Eurodac, thereby ensuring that all the rules applicable to such systems, with regard to purpose and rights of access as well as security and data-protection provisions, are implemented in full; emphasises in this regard that it is essential for the EU to have a comprehensive, uniform set of rules on the protection of personal data;
ponovno opozarja, da je bila na nekaterih področjih ustanovitev agencij, denimo Agencije Evropske unije za temeljne pravice, Eurojusta, Europola, Frontexa in Urada za podporo na področju azila, zelo koristna za vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice; meni, da je ob upoštevanju, da je Schengen jedro območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, temeljnega pomena in nujno, da se ustanovi evropska agencija za upravljanje pomembnih informacijskih sistemov na tem področju, to so SIS II, VIS in Eurodac, saj je to najbolj zanesljiva rešitev;
Recalls that in certain areas the creation of agencies, for instance the FRA, Eurojust, Europol, Frontex and the EASO, has been very useful for the establishment of an AFSJ; considers that, given that Schengen is the core of the AFSJ, it is fundamental and vital to create an European agency for the management of substantial information systems in this area, namely SIS II, VIS and Eurodac, because this is the most reliable solution;
obžaluje, da bo Lizbonska pogodba začela veljati, ne da bi Svet in Komisija ustrezno pripravila ukrepe, ki so potrebni za "nov začetek" na območju svobode, varnosti in pravice; poudarja, da v nasprotju z delom, opravljenim na področju evropske varnostne in obrambne politike, predvsem na področju službe za zunanje delovanje, ni bilo nobenih priprav za izvajanje pravne podlage na področju preglednosti (člen 15 PDEU), zaščite podatkov (člen 16 PDEU) in preprečevanja diskriminacije (člen 18 PDEU) in da je rezultat tega lahko dolgo obdobje pravne negotovosti, ki bi vplivala predvsem na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice; iz tega razloga in ob upoštevanju člena 265 PDEU poziva Komisijo, naj pred 1. septembrom 2010 z uporabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka predloži:
Deplores the fact that the Lisbon Treaty will enter into force without the Council and the Commission having adequately prepared the measures needed for a 'new start' in the AFSJ; points out that, contrary to what has been done in the European Security and Defence Policy area, notably for the External Action Service, no preparatory work has been carried out with a view to implementing the legal bases on transparency (Article 15 TFEU), data protection (Article 16 TFEU) and non-discrimination (Article 18 TFEU), and that the outcome of this situation could be a long period of legal uncertainty which will affect the AFSJ in particular; asks the Commission, in view of the above and with reference to Article 265 of the TFEU, to submit the following under the ordinary legislative procedure before 1 September 2010:
okvirni zakonodajni predlog, kjer bo pojasnjena udeležba Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov pri oceni politik območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter agencij, ki so udeležene na evropski ravni (skupaj z oblastmi za schengenski režim, Europolom, Eurojustom, Frontexom in Evropskim uradom za podporo azilu);
a framework legislative proposal outlining the involvement of the European Parliament and national parliaments in the evaluation of AFSJ policies and of the agencies involved at European level (including the Schengen authorities, Europol, Eurojust, Frontex and the EASO);
spremenjen mandat Agencije za temeljne pravice, ki bo med drugim obsegal pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah;
a revised mandate for the FRA, covering, among other things, judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters;
zakonodajni predlog za izvajanje člena 16 PDEU in člena 39 Pogodbe EU, predvsem na področju zaščite podatkov, kadar gre za vprašanja varnosti, ki bo obenem razširil področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 45/2001 o varstvu osebnih podatkov v institucijah Skupnosti;
a legislative proposal implementing Article 16 of the TFEU and Article 39 of the TEU, in particular as regards the protection of data when security issues are at stake, and, at the same time, broadening the scope of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 as regards data protection by the EU institutions;
revidiran zakonodajni okvir za Europol in Eurojust, ki bo skladen z novim zakonodajnim okvirom EU;
a revised legal framework for Europol and Eurojust, to bring them into line with the new EU legal framework;
poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma predlaga združitev približno 1200 različnih ukrepov, ki so bili od leta 1993 sprejeti v OSVP, da bi v to področje politike vnesli skladnost, pri čemer se upošteva nove misije in vloge Unije ter nov pravni okvir, ki ga ponuja Lizbonska pogodba, začenši s področji, ki se v dogovoru z Evropskim parlamentom razumejo kot prednostna; opozarja Komisijo, da bo Parlament njene zaveze ocenil na bližajočih se razgovorih s kandidati za komisarje; zato poziva Komisijo, naj za vsak primer posebej jasno izrazi, katere predloge namerava kodificirati ali prenoviti ter si pridržuje pravico do polne uporabe svojih pooblastil za zakonodajne spremembe; meni, da bi moral imeti novi zakonodajni okvir OSVP prednost pred domnevnimi potrebami po kontinuiteti ali konsolidaciji zakonodaje, ki je bila oblikovana v bistveno drugačnem ustavnem okviru;
Calls on the Commission to propose forthwith a consolidation of the 1 200 divers measures adopted in the AFSJ since 1993 in order to bring coherence in this policy area, whilst taking account of the Union's new missions and roles as well as of the new legal framework offered by the Treaty of Lisbon, starting with areas considered as priorities in agreement with the European Parliament; reminds the Commission that Parliament will assess its commitments on this during the forthcoming Commissioner hearings; asks the Commission therefore to state clearly, on a case-by-case basis, which proposals it intends to codify or recast, and reserves the right to make full use of its power to amend legislation; considers that the new AFSJ legal framework should be given priority over the need for continuity or consolidation of legislation that was shaped in a substantially different constitutional framework;
poudarja, da bi moral biti predvsem za zakonodajne predloge v zvezi z območjem varnosti, pravice in svobode postopek odločanja od prvega dne po začetku veljave Lizbonske strategije pregleden in v skladu s pravili glede:
Stresses that, in particular for AFSJ-related legislative proposals, the decision-making process should, from the first day after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, be transparent and in keeping with the rules dealing with
obdobja osmih tednov, ki ga imajo nacionalni parlamenti na voljo, da preverijo skladnost z merili subsidiarnosti,
the eight-week period during which the national parliaments may verify compliance with the criterion of subsidiarity,
posebnega režima uporabe možnosti opt-in/opt-out, ki je odobrena nekaterim državam (Velika Britanija, Irska in Danska)
the specific opt-ins/opt-outs granted to some countries (the United Kingdom, Ireland and Denmark),
nove prenesene pristojnosti (člen 290 PDEU) in izvedbenih ukrepov iz člena 291 PDEU, ki trenutno nimajo pravne podlage;
and the new delegated power (Article 290 TFEU) and the implementing measures that are provided for in Article 291 TFEU, but for which there is currently no legal basis;
meni, da bi bilo treba v primerih, kjer se je zakonodajni postopek začel po Pogodbi iz Nice, ki določa zgolj posvetovanje s Parlamentom, to pa velja za številne vidike, ki spadajo v OSVP, in je Parlament svoje mnenje že izrazil, zakonodajni postopek začeti znova po določilih Lizbonske pogodbe in s prvo obravnavo, da bi Parlament lahko izrazil mnenje glede na posebne pravice, ki so mu dodeljene;
is of the opinion that, in cases where a legislative procedure has started under the provisions of the Treaty of Nice providing for mere consultation of Parliament, as is the case in many areas of the AFSJ, and Parliament's opinion has been delivered, the legislative procedure should recommence under the Treaty of Lisbon at first reading in order to give Parliament the opportunity to express its views in awareness of its prerogatives;
poudarja, da bi morala biti v nasprotju z navedenim v osnutku stockholmskega programa, ki ga je pripravil Svet, kadar gre za temeljne pravice, zunanja politika EU skladna z notranjim pravnim okvirom EU in ne obratno; želi biti nemudoma obveščen o načrtovanih ali potekajočih pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki spadajo v območje varnosti, svobode in pravice, predvsem kadar temeljijo na členih 24 in 38 Pogodbe EU; meni, da je treba pred naslednjim vrhunskim srečanjem med EU in ZDA posebno pozornost nameniti oblikovanju skladne skupne strategije za prihodnje odnose z ZDA v zvezi z OVSP, predvsem kar zadeva sklenitev sporazumov, ki naj bi se sklenili v bližnji prihodnosti:
Stresses that, contrary to what was stated in the Presidency's draft Stockholm programme, when fundamental rights are at stake EU external policy should comply with the EU's internal legal framework and not the reverse; asks to be informed immediately of planned or pending negotiations on international agreements with a bearing on the AFSJ, in particular those founded on Articles 24 and 38 of the current EU Treaty; considers that special priority should be given to formulating, before the next EU-US summit, a coherent common strategy for future relations with the USA in connection with the AFSJ, in particular as regards the conclusion of the following pending agreements:
nekdanji sistem Skupnosti v zvezi s sporazumom za odpravi vizumov v okviru elektronskega sistema za odobritev potovanja,
the former 'Community track' of the ESTA visa waiver agreement,
sporazum med EU in ZDA o evidenci imen letalskih potnikov,
the EU-US passenger name records agreement,
sporazum med EU in ZDA o dostopu do finančnih podatkov (SWIFT) z ustreznim upoštevanjem sporazuma med EU in ZDA o medsebojni pravni pomoči in izročitvah,
the EU-US agreement on access to financial data (SWIFT), with due reference to the EU-US agreements on mutual legal assistance and on extradition,
okvir EU-ZDA za varstvo podatkov, ki se izmenjujejo za varnostne namene;
the EU-US framework for protecting data exchanged for security purposes;
poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi in napravi dostopnejše finančne programe, ustanovljene za podporo vzpostavitvi območja svobode, varnosti in pravice; v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po finančni solidarnosti pri pripravi novih finančnih perspektiv;
Calls on the Commission to simplify the financial programmes established to support the creation of the AFSJ and to make them more accessible; in this context, underlines the need for financial solidarity in the preparation of new financial perspectives;
si pridržuje pravico, da ponovno ponudi posebne predloge, ko bo zaprošen za mnenje o zakonodajnem akcijskem programu;
Reserves the right to come back with specific proposals when it is consulted on the legislative action programme;
poziva, da se do začetka leta 2012 opravi vmesna revizija in presoja Stockholmskega programa;
Calls for a mid-term review and evaluation of the Stockholm programme by early 2012;
B7-0147 , 0148 , 0149 in 0150/2009
B7-0147 , 0148 , 0149 and 0150/2009
ob upoštevanju Barcelonske deklaracije, sprejete na prvi ministrski konferenci Euromed, ki je potekala 27. in 28. novembra 1995, in na kateri je bilo ustanovljeno partnerstvo med Evropsko unijo in državami južnega in vzhodnega Sredozemlja,
having regard to the Barcelona Declaration, adopted at the first Euromed Ministerial Conference held on 27-28 November 1995, which established a partnership between the European Union and the southern and eastern Mediterranean countries (SEMCs),
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma iz Agadirja o prosti trgovini, ki so ga dne 25. februarja 2004 podpisali Jordanija, Egipt, Tunizija in Maroko,
having regard to the free trade agreement, known as the Agadir Agreement, signed by Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia and Morocco on 25 February 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepov evro-sredozemskih ministrskih konferenc in sektorskih ministrskih konferenc, ki so se odvijale od začetka barcelonskega procesa, zlasti sklepov šeste evro-sredozemske trgovinske ministrske konference 21. oktobra 2007 v Lizboni in sedme evro-sredozemske trgovinske ministrske konference 2. julija 2008 v Marseillu,
having regard to the conclusions of the Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial Conferences and Sectoral Ministerial Conferences that have taken place since the launch of the Barcelona Process, and particularly the conclusions of the 6th Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial Conference on Trade held in Lisbon on 21 October 2007 and the 7th Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial Conference on Trade held in Marseilles on 2 July 2008,
ob upoštevanju vrhunskega srečanja za Sredozemlje v Parizu dne 13. julija 2008 med voditelji držav in predsedniki vlad evro-sredozemskih držav, na katerem je bila ustanovljena Unija za Sredozemlje,
having regard to the Paris Summit for the Mediterranean of Euro-Mediterranean Heads of State and Government of 13 July 2008 which created the Union for the Mediterranean (UfM),
ob upoštevanju presoje vpliva evro-sredozemskega območja prostotrgovinske izmenjave na trajnostni razvoj, ki jo je pripravil Inštitut za razvojno politiko in upravljanje Univerze v Manchestru,
having regard to the sustainability impact assessment (SIA) of the Euro-Mediterranean Free Trade Area (FTA) drawn up by Manchester University's Institute for Development Policy and Management,
ob upoštevanju končne izjave, sprejete na ministrskem vrhu ekonomsko-socialnih svetov in podobnih institucij Euromed, ki je potekal v Aleksandriji 18. in 19. oktobra 2009,
having regard to the final declaration of the Euromed Summit of Economic and Social Councils and Similar Institutions held in Alexandria on 18 and 19 October 2009,
ob upoštevanju srečanja evro-sredozemskih visokih uradnikov za trgovino dne 11. novembra 2009 v Bruslju,
having regard to the meeting of Euro-Mediterranean Trade Senior Officials held on 11 November 2009 in Brussels,
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o sredozemski politiki EU, zlasti resolucije z dne 15. marca 2007 o ustanovitvi evro-sredozemskega območja prostotrgovinske izmenjave UL C 301 E, 13.12.2007, str.
having regard to its previous resolutions on the EU's Mediterranean policy, in particular that of 15 March 2007 on the construction of the Euro-Mediterranean free trade zone OJ C 301 E, 13.12.2007, p.
in resolucije z dne 19. februarja 2009 o barcelonskem procesu - Unija za Sredozemlje Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0077 .
and that of 19 February 2009 on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0077 .
ker je konferenca v Barceloni leta 1995 uvedla zelo ambiciozen projekt, namreč oblikovanje novih in tesnejših političnih, gospodarskih, družbenih in kulturnih povezav med severom in jugom Sredozemlja, in ker proces še zdaleč ni končan,
whereas the 1995 Barcelona Conference launched a very ambitious project, namely the creation of new and closer political, economic, social and cultural ties between the northern and southern shores of the Mediterranean, and whereas that project is still a long way from completion,
ker proces ustanovitve Unije za Sredozemlje, ki naj bi s konkretnimi in prepoznavnimi projekti dal ponoven zagon procesu evro-sredozemskega povezovanja, še vedno poteka; ker med januarjem in julijem 2009 zaradi vojne v Gazi ni bilo zasedanj Euromeda,
whereas the process of establishing the UfM, which is intended to revitalise the Euro-Mediterranean integration process by means of concrete and visible projects, is still under way; whereas no Euromed meetings were scheduled between January and July 2009 because of the conflict in the Gaza Strip,
ker je bilo treba srečanje ministrov Euromed za zunanje zadeve v Istanbulu, predvideno za 24. in 25. november 2009, preložiti zaradi bojkota arabskih držav, ki so protestirale proti stališču Izraela o mirovnem procesu na Bližnjem vzhodu,
whereas the meeting of Euromed Foreign Affairs Ministers which was to have been held in Istanbul on 24-25 November 2009 has had to be postponed owing to a boycott by the Arab States, in protest against the Israeli position on the Middle East peace process,
ker je Evropska unija podpisala pridružitvene sporazume z vsemi južnimi sredozemskimi partnerji, razen s Sirijo in Libijo; ker so bila pogajanja o pridružitvenem sporazumu s Sirijo zaključena, vendar je Sirija odložila podpis sporazuma, in ker je Komisija začela pogajanja z Libijo,
whereas the EU has signed association agreements with all its southern Mediterranean partners, with the exception of Syria and Libya; whereas the negotiations with Syria for an association agreement have been concluded, but its signing was postponed by Syria, and whereas the Commission has opened negotiations with Libya,
ker je treba dvostranski pristop, ki je del vsakega tovrstnega procesa in posledica posebnih kulturnih, družbenih, gospodarskih in političnih razlik med udeleženimi državami, voditi in podpirati z bolj globalnim pogledom in načrtom za odnose med različnimi partnerji, in zato vključiti tudi regionalni pristop,
whereas the bilateral approach, which is a component of any such process and a consequence of the specific cultural, social, economic and political differences between the countries involved, should be led and supported by a more global vision and plan for relations among the various partners, and thus accompanied by a regional approach,
ker obe strani Sredozemlja še naprej pesti izrazito gospodarsko, socialno in demografsko neskladje, ki utrjuje razlike v bogastvu, iz katerih izvirajo nestabilnost ter migracijski in okoljski pritiski v regiji; ker obstajajo med sredozemskimi državami velike razlike v razvoju; poudarja, da se več kot 30 % prebivalstva v državah vzhodnega in južnega Sredozemlja preživi z manj kot dvema ameriškima dolarjema na dan,
whereas the two shores of the Mediterranean continue to present a strikingly asymmetrical picture in economic, social and demographic terms, evidencing a wealth gap which is at the roots of instability and migratory and environmental pressures in the region; whereas there are significant differences between the Mediterranean countries in terms of development; and whereas more than 30% of the population in the SEMCs lives on less than USD 2 a day,
ker je gospodarstvo držav južnega in vhodnega Sredozemlja zelo odvisno od zunanje trgovine; ker približno 50 % teh trgovinskih tokov poteka proti EU, čeprav za EU pomenijo zgolj 8 % zunanje trgovine, s pozitivno bilanco za EU; ker izvozne strukture držav južnega in vzhodnega Sredozemlja niso raznolike in ker te države ostajajo specializirane za sektorje, ki malo prispevajo k rasti,
whereas the economies of the SEMCs are highly dependent on foreign trade; whereas around 50% of their trade flows are to the EU, although they account for only 8% of the EU's external trade, with a positive balance for the EU; and whereas the export structures of the SEMCs are very poorly diversified and these countries remain specialised in sectors which bring little in the way of growth,
ker je Evropska unija največji tuji vlagatelj v tej regiji, vendar ostaja raven neposrednih tujih naložb v primerjavi z drugimi regijami po svetu zelo nizka, in ker so med državami velike razlike glede zmožnosti privabljanja tujih neposrednih naložb,
whereas the EU is the major foreign investor in the region but foreign direct investments (FDIs) remain very low there compared to other parts of the world, and whereas there are great differences, from one country to another, in the capacity to attract FDIs,
ker proces regijskega povezovanja jug-jug še zdaleč ni končan in so trgovinski tokovi jug-jug premalo razviti ter pomenijo le 6 % celotne trgovine za države južnega in vzhodnega Sredozemlja,
whereas South-South regional integration is far from being achieved, and whereas South-South trade flows are underdeveloped, accounting for only 6% of the SEMCs" total trade,
ker bi utegnila ta situacija zelo škoditi procesu evro-sredozemskega povezovanja, zlasti pa varnosti preskrbe s hrano in suverenosti držav južnega in vhodnega Sredozemlja, zaradi vse hujših posledic koncentracije trgovine, kot so vedno večja odvisnost od maloštevilnih – večinoma kmetijskih – izvoznih artiklov v EU, medtem ko istočasno naraščajo potrebe po uvozu osnovnih živil, zaradi česar države južnega in vzhodnega Sredozemlja in njihova podjetja nimajo koristi,
whereas this situation could have very harmful effects on the Euro-Mediterranean integration process, and on the food security and sovereignty of the SEMCs in particular, by exacerbating the effects of trade concentration, such as increasing dependence on a few – mainly agricultural – items exported to the EU while in parallel increasing the need for basic food imports, and therefore not benefitting the SEMCs and their enterprises,