natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. februarja 2007 o tematski strategiji o recikliranju odpadkov UL C 287E, 29.11.2007, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 February 2007 on a thematic strategy on the recycling of waste OJ C 287 E, 29.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0203/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0203/2010 ),
ker pobuda Komisije, predstavljena v njeni zeleni knjigi, pomeni priložnost za ukrepanje Skupnosti pri ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki,
whereas the Commission initiative promoted in its Green Paper provides an opportunity for Community action on the management of bio-waste,
ker pravilno ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki nima le okoljskih, pač pa tudi družbene in ekonomske prednosti,
whereas the proper management of bio-waste brings not only environmental but also social and economic advantages,
ker člen 2(4) okvirne direktive o odpadkih določa, da se posebna ali dopolnilna pravila o ravnanju z določenimi kategorijami odpadkov lahko določijo s posebnimi direktivami,
whereas Article 2(4) of the Waste Framework Directive provides that specific or supplementary rules on the management of particular categories of waste may be laid down by means of individual directives,
ker Direktiva 1999/31/ES o odlagališčih odpadkov ne zagotavlja dovolj instrumentov za trajnostno ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki;
whereas Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste does not provide sufficient instruments for the sustainable management of organic waste,
ker so pravila o ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki razdrobljena in veljavni zakonodajni instrumenti niso dovolj, da bi uresničili zadane cilje učinkovitega ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki; ker je zaradi tega potrebna posebna direktiva za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki; ker bi bila že sama združitev vseh različnih pravil o ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki v enem samem zakonodajnem dokumentu izkaz zakonodajne odličnosti in boljše priprave zakonodaje, obenem pa bi prinesla poenostavitev, večjo jasnost, boljše spremljanje in okrepljeno izvajanje ter pravno varnost in tako zagotovila dolgoročno zaupanje javnih in zasebnih vlagateljev,
whereas the rules on the management of bio-waste are fragmented and the current legislative instruments are not sufficient to achieve the stated objectives of the effective management of bio-waste; whereas, consequently, a specific directive is necessary for the management of bio-waste; whereas compiling all the various rules on the management of bio-waste in a single piece of legislation would in itself be an exercise in legislative excellence and better lawmaking, whilst at the same time ensuring simplification, greater clarity and better monitoring and enforcement of implementation and legal certainty and thus guaranteeing the long-term confidence of public and private investors,
ker je bila v sklepih konference o recikliranju bioloških odpadkov v Evropi 15. februarja 2010 v Barceloni, ki so se je udeležili tudi Svet, Komisija in Evropski parlament Sporočilo sekretariata Sveta z dne 9. marca 2010, dokument Sveta 7307/10.
whereas the conclusions of the conference on the recycling of bio-waste in Europe, held in Barcelona on 15 February 2010 with the participation of the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament Note from the Council Secretariat, 9 March 2010, Council document 7307/10.
, izjava, da je treba oblikovati evropski zakonodajni okvir o bioloških odpadkih, saj je zdaj prelomni trenutek za spodbujanje take ureditve,
, stated that it is necessary to act in order to create a European legislative framework on bio-waste, since this is a key moment to promote such regulation,
ker bi morala biti posebna direktiva o bioloških odpadkih dovolj prilagodljiva, da bi upoštevala različne razpoložljive možnosti ravnanja, obenem pa obstaja veliko spremenljivk in lokalnih vidikov, ki jih je treba upoštevati,
whereas a specific directive on bio-waste should have the necessary flexibility to cover the various management options available, bearing in mind that there are a large number of variables and local considerations that need to be taken into account,
ker obstaja zaradi zelo različnih politik držav članic pri ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki še neizrabljen potencial; ker je potrebno boljše ravnanje s temi odpadki, da bi dosegli učinkovito in trajnostno upravljanje virov; ker bi bilo treba povečati ločeno zbiranje bioloških odpadkov, da bi uresničili cilje za recikliranje in obnovljive vire energije ter s tem prispevali k uresničevanju ciljev strategije EU 2020, zlasti v okviru vodilne pobude za učinkovito rabo virov,
noting the unexplored potential of bio-waste managed in line with widely differing policies in each Member State; whereas improved management of this waste is necessary in order to achieve the efficient and sustainable management of resources; whereas the separate collection of bio-waste should be stepped up in order to reach the targets for recycling and renewable energies and thereby contribute to achieving the goals of the EU 2020 strategy, in particular within the framework of the flagship of resource efficiency,
ker ločeno zbiranje omogoča zlasti optimalno ravnanje z nekaterimi vrstami bioloških odpadkov, na primer kuhinjskimi odpadki na ravni potrošnikov in gostinstva ter biološko razgradljivimi odpadki in odpadki, primernimi za kompostiranje, iz gostinskih obratov, ki uporabljajo posodo in pribor za enkratno uporabo,
whereas separate collection permits, in particular, the optimal management of certain types of bio-waste, i.e. kitchen waste at consumer and catering levels and also biodegradable and compostable waste from restaurants employing single-use crockery items,
ker kompostiranje bioloških odpadkov omogoča recikliranje proizvodov, ki so biološko razgradljivi in primerni za kompostiranje in zajeti v pobudi Skupnosti (pobuda za vodilni trg),
whereas composting organic waste permits the recycling of the biodegradable and compostable products already covered by a Community initiative (the Lead Market Initiative),
ker je treba določiti standarde kakovosti na ravni EU za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki in kakovost komposta; ker bo ureditev meril kakovosti za kompost, ki bo zajemala celovit pristop in zagotovila sledljivost, kakovost in varno uporabo, omogočila večje zaupanje potrošnikov v ta proizvod; ker bi bilo treba kompost oceniti glede na njegovo kakovost, tako da uporaba komposta ne bo imela škodljivega učinka na tla in podtalnico, zlasti na kmetijske proizvode, ki se pridelajo v takih tleh,
whereas EU-level quality standards need to be defined for the treatment of bio-waste and the quality of compost; whereas regulating the quality parameters for compost, including an integrated approach ensuring traceability, quality and safe use, will make it possible to build consumer confidence in this product; whereas compost should be graded in line with its quality, to the extent that the use of compost will have no detrimental effect for soil and groundwater, and in particular for the agricultural produce stemming from that soil,
ker so za uresničitev ciljev za preusmeritev bioloških odpadkov z odlagališč zaradi slabega izvajanja teh ciljev potrebne dodatne zakonodajne smernice,
whereas, given their poor implementation, the objectives set for diverting bio-waste from landfills require additional legislative guidelines if they are to be achieved,
ker bodo morda potrebni zaščitni ukrepi, s katerimi bi zagotovili, da zaradi uporabe komposta ne bo prišlo do onesnaževanja tal ali podtalnice,
whereas protective measures can be necessary to ensure that the use of compost does not result in pollution of soil or groundwater,
ker je treba preučiti in ovrednotiti tudi možnosti za uporabo komposta slabe kakovosti, da ne bi ogrozili okolja ali zdravja ljudi, in ker bi ustrezna opredelitev na ravni EU, kdaj je kompost proizvod in kdaj odpadek, omogočila državam članicam lažje odločanje o vprašanjih uporabe komposta,
whereas the possibilities for using poor-quality compost so as not to harm the environment or human health should also be considered and assessed, and whereas, at EU level, properly defining the possibilities for using poor-quality compost and establishing when compost is considered a product and when it is considered waste would make it easier for Member States to orient themselves when deciding on matters relating to compost use,
ker je Evropa, gospodarna z viri, ena vodilnih pobud strategije Evropa 2020 in je zato treba spodbujati učinkovito rabo virov; ker recikliranje bioloških odpadkov prispeva k učinkovitejši rabi virov,
whereas a resource-efficient Europe is one of the flagships of the Europe 2020 Strategy and therefore resource efficiency should be encouraged; whereas recycling of bio-waste contributes towards increasing resource efficiency,
ker vlažni biološki odpadki zmanjšujejo učinkovitost sežiganja; ker direktiva o proizvodnji električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije posredno spodbuja sežiganje bioloških odpadkov; ker lahko biološki odpadki bolje prispevajo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam, če jih recikliramo v kompost za izboljšanje kakovosti tal, in k skladiščenju ogljika, tega pa sedaj direktiva o proizvodnji električne energije iz obnovljivih virov energije ne spodbuja,
whereas moist bio-waste lowers the efficiency of incineration; whereas the incineration of bio-waste is indirectly encouraged through the Directive on Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources; whereas bio-waste can better contribute to combating climate change through recycling it into compost to improve soil quality and achieve carbon sequestration, which is not currently promoted by the Directive on Electricity Production from Renewable Energy Sources,
ker je anaerobna razgradnja za proizvodnjo bioplina učinkovit način energetske predelave, tako pridobljeno pregnito blato pa se lahko uporabi za proizvodnjo komposta,
whereas anaerobic digestion for the production of biogas is an efficient means of energy recovery; while the digestate thereof can be used to produce compost,
ker mora biti glavni cilj primernega ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki rezultat, kar pomeni, da lahko ostanejo na razpolago vse tehnološke možnosti za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki za spodbujanje inovacij, znanstvenih raziskav in konkurenčnosti,
whereas the main aim of the appropriate management of bio-waste must be the result, which means that all the technological options for the management of bio-waste can be kept open to encourage innovation, scientific research and competitiveness,
ker je med prehodom na družbo recikliranja in razvojem gospodarstva z nizkimi emisijami ogljika ter možnostmi za nova zelena delovna mesta na tem področju precejšnja sinergija, zato je treba tudi nameniti sredstva za raziskave o vplivu delovnega okolja na zbiranje bioloških odpadkov in ravnanje z njimi,
whereas there is a significant synergy between the transition to a recycling society developing a low carbon economy and the potential for creating green jobs in this field, and consequently a need for appropriations to be earmarked for research into the impact on the working environment of the collection and management of bio-waste,
ker bi morale Komisija in države članice spodbujati dejavnosti za povečevanje okoljske ozaveščenosti na tem področju, zlasti v šolah, da bi spodbudili trajnostno ravnanje s trdnimi komunalnimi odpadki in povečali ozaveščenost javnosti glede prednosti ločenega zbiranja; ker imajo občine in komunalna podjetja pomembno vlogo pri svetovanju in obveščanju javnosti o preprečevanju nastajanja odpadkov,
whereas the Commission and Member States should promote environmental awareness-raising activities in this field, particularly in schools, so as to foster the sustainable management of solid urban waste and raise public awareness of the advantages of separate collection; whereas municipalities and municipal undertakings play an important role in providing advice and information for the public on preventing waste,
ker biološki odpadki tvorijo več kot 30 % trdnih komunalnih odpadkov; ker je v Evropski uniji čedalje več bioloških odpadkov, če ti končajo na odlagališčih, pa predstavljajo pomemben vir emisij toplogrednih plinov in drugih negativnih vplivov na okolje, zaradi česar je ravnanje z odpadki četrti najpomembnejši vir toplogrednih plinov,
whereas bio-waste accounts for more than 30 % of solid urban waste; whereas the volume of bio-waste is rising in the European Union, representing a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions and other negative environmental effects when dumped in landfills in conditions owing to which waste management is now the fourth most important source of greenhouse gases;
ker biološki odpadki iz gospodinjstev niso edini, ki se v praksi trajnostno obdelujejo,
whereas it is not only bio-waste of household origin that is being treated sustainably in practice,
ker bi bilo treba ravnanje s tovrstnimi odpadki strukturirati v skladu s hierarhijo ravnanja z odpadki: preprečevanje nastajanja in zmanjševanje, ponovna uporaba, recikliranje, druge vrste predelave, zlasti v zvezi s pridobivanjem energije, kot zadnja možnost pa odlaganje (v skladu s členom 4 okvirne direktive o odpadkih, ki določa, da je recikliranje bioloških odpadkov boljše od sežiganja, saj s tem preprečimo nastajanje metana ter prispevamo k boju proti podnebnim spremembam s skladiščenjem ogljika in izboljšanjem kakovosti zemlje); ker je preprečevanje nastajanja prednostni cilj ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki in ker omogoča zlasti izogibanje živilskim in zelenim odpadkom, recimo prek boljšega načrtovanja javnih parkov z rastlinami in drevesi, ki ne potrebujejo intenzivnega vzdrževanja,
whereas the management of such waste should be structured in line with the ’waste hierarchy’: prevention and reduction, reuse, recycling, other types of recovery, in particular for energy purposes, and as the last option, landfilling (in accordance with Article 4 of the Waste Framework Directive), according to which the recycling of bio-waste is preferable to its incineration as it not only avoids the formation of methane gas, but also contributes to combating climate change via carbon sequestration and improving soil quality; whereas prevention is the priority objective in the management of bio-waste and makes it possible, in particular, to avoid food waste and green waste, for example through the improved planning of public parks with low-maintenance plants and trees,
ker je treba to vprašanje obravnavati iz celovite perspektive energetske politike in politike varstva tal ter v skladu s cilji glede blaženja podnebnih sprememb, če želimo napredovati proti okoljsko učinkovitemu ravnanju z biološkimi odpadki; ker je dodatna prednost ohranjanje biološke raznovrstnosti, ko se biološki odpadki uporabljajo kot nadomestilo za šoto, s čimer se zaščitijo mokriščni ekosistemi,
whereas, if we are to move towards an environmentally effective management of bio-waste, the matter needs to be viewed from an integrated perspective in energy and soil protection policies, in line with climate change mitigation goals; whereas a further advantage is the preservation of biodiversity when treated bio-waste is used as a substitute for peat, thereby protecting wetland eco-systems,
ker lahko anaerobna razgradnja za proizvodnjo bioplina iz bioloških odpadkov koristno prispeva k trajnostnemu ravnanju z viri v EU in k trajnostnemu izpolnjevanju ciljev glede obnovljive energije v EU,
whereas anaerobic digestion to produce biogas from bio-waste can make a valuable contribution to sustainable resource management in the EU and to meeting the EU's renewable energy targets in a sustainable way,
ker bi bilo treba biološke odpadke obravnavati kot dragocen naravni vir za proizvodnjo kakovostnega komposta, s čimer bi prispevali k boju proti degradaciji tal v Evropi, ohranjanju rodovitnosti tal, zmanjšanju uporabe kemičnih gnojil v kmetijstvu, zlasti gnojil na podlagi fosforja, in povečanju zmogljivosti tal za zadrževanje vode,
whereas bio-waste should be seen as a valuable natural resource that can be used to produce high-quality compost, thereby helping to combat soil degradation in Europe, maintaining soil productivity, reducing the use of chemical fertilisers in agriculture, and especially of those based on phosphorus, and boosting the soil's water retention capacity,
ker države članice uporabljajo različne sisteme ravnanja z odpadki, odlaganje trdnih komunalnih odpadkov pa je v Evropski uniji še vedno najpogosteje uporabljan postopek, čeprav je za okolje to najslabša rešitev,
whereas different waste management systems are used in the Member States and landfilling is still the most widely used method of disposing of solid urban waste in the European Union, even though it is the worst option for the environment,
ker ima proizvodnja goriva za prevoz iz bioloških odpadkov pomembno prednost za okolje,
whereas the production of fuel for transport from bio-waste offers a significant environmental advantage;
ker je treba na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki spodbujati znanstvene raziskave in tehnološke inovacije,
whereas scientific research and technological innovation need to be encouraged in the field of bio-waste management,
ker ločeno zbiranje zdaj omogoča preprečevanje kontaminacije in spodbuja pridobivanje kakovostnega komposta z zagotavljanjem kakovostnih materialov za recikliranje bioloških odpadkov ter boljšo učinkovitostjo energetske predelave,
whereas separate collection currently makes it possible to prevent contamination and help achieve the goal of obtaining high-quality compost, providing quality materials for the recycling of bio-waste and making energy recovery more efficient,
ker študije in izkušnje, ki so na voljo v državah članicah, kažejo, da je pomembno ločeno zbiranje odpadkov, ki je izvedljivo, pa tudi okoljsko in ekonomsko trajnostno, moralo pa bi biti tudi obvezno; ker mora biti ločeno zbiranje pogoj za proizvodnjo visokokakovostnega komposta,
whereas the available studies and experience in the Member States show that it is important to have a separate collection which is both practicable as well as environmentally and economically sustainableand which should be made compulsory; whereas separate collection should be the prerequisite for the production of high quality compost,
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda veljavno zakonodajo za biološke odpadke, da bo ob upoštevanju načela subsidiarnosti pripravila predlog posebne direktive do konca leta 2010, ki bo med drugim vključevala:
Urges the Commission to review the existing legislation applicable to bio-waste with a view, in accordance with the subsidiarity principle, to drawing up a proposal for a specific directive by the end of 2010, including inter alia:
uvedbo sistema obveznega ločenega zbiranja za države članice, razen če to ni primerna izbira z okoljskega in ekonomskega vidika;
establishment of a mandatory separate collection system for the Member States, except where this is not the appropriate option from the environmental and economic point of view,
recikliranje bioloških odpadkov;
recycling of bio-waste,
kakovostno razvrščanje različnih vrst komposta iz bioloških odpadkov;
a quality-based classification of the different types of compost from bio-waste;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo v nacionalnih emisijskih načrtih količinske opredelitve zmanjšanja ekvivalenta CO2, ki bo doseženo z recikliranjem in kompostiranjem;
Calls on the Commission to provide a quantification under the National Emissions Plan of the CO2-equivalent reductions obtained from recycling and composting;
ugotavlja, da bi prihodnji okvir Evropske unije za veliko držav članic zagotovil pravno svetovanje in pojasnitev ter jih spodbujal k naložbam na področju ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj države članice podpre pri uvajanju sistemov za ločevanje odpadkov in pripravi obvezujoče in ambiciozne načrte za recikliranje tovrstnih odpadkov;
Notes that a future European Union framework would provide legal guidance and clarity for many Member States and would encourage them to make investments in the field of bio-waste management; urges the Commission to support the Member States in introducing waste separation systems and to introduce binding and ambitious targets for the recycling of this waste;
opominja, da šesti okoljski akcijski program Skupnosti 2001–2010 z dne 22. julija 2002 v svojem členu 8(2)(iv) zavezuje Komisijo k razvoju zakonodaje za ravnanje z biološkimi odpadki kot eno prednostnih nalog, da bi dosegli cilj trajnostne uporabe naravnih virov in odpadkov ter ravnanja z njimi, vendar osem let kasneje zakonodajni predlog še vedno ni v pripravi, kar je nesprejemljivo;
Recalls that the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme 2001-2010 of 22 July 2002 obliged the Commission to develop legislation on biodegradable waste in its Article 8(2)(iv) as one priority action to achieve the objective of sustainable use and management of natural resources and wastes, but that even eight years later no legislative proposal has been forthcoming, which is unacceptable,
poziva Komisijo, naj v svoji presoji vplivov opredeli boljši sistem ravnanja z biološkimi odpadki glede recikliranja ločeno zbranih bioloških odpadkov, uporabe kompostiranja za kmetijske in ekološke koristi, mehanske/biološke možnosti obdelave in uporabe bioloških odpadkov kot vir za pridobivanje energije; meni, da bi na tej presoji morala temeljiti priprava novega pravnega okvira Evropske unije o biološko razgradljivih odpadkih;
Calls on the Commission to elaborate in its impact assessment an improved system for the management of bio-waste regarding the recycling of separately collected bio-waste, the use of composting for agricultural and ecological benefit, the mechanical/biological treatment options, and the use of bio-waste as a source for generating energy; considers that this impact assessment should be used as a basis for preparing a new European Union legal framework on biodegradable waste;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s členom 6 okvirne direktive o odpadkih skupaj z državami članicami določi merila za proizvodnjo in uporabo komposta visoke kakovosti ter sprejme minimalne zahteve za končne proizvode, ki bodo omogočale razvrščanje po kakovosti različnih načinov uporabe za različne komposte, pridobljene z obdelavo bioloških odpadkov, in sicer v sklopu strategije, ki bo temeljila na celovitem pristopu, s čimer bosta poleg kakovosti zagotovljeni tudi sledljivost in varna uporaba proizvoda;
Urges the Commission to lay down criteria in conjunction with Member States for the prodcution and use of high-quality compost and to adopt minimum requirements for end products, in accordance with Article 6 of the Waste Framework Directive, which permits quality-grading covering different types of use for the various types of compost obtained through the treatment of bio-waste in the framework of a strategy based on an integrated approach ensuring not only quality but also product traceability and safe use;
meni, da je anaerobna razgradnja zlasti uporabna za biološke odpadke, ker daje s hranili bogate snovi za izboljšanje tal, pregnito blato in bioplin, ki je obnovljiva energija, ki se lahko pretvori v biometan ali uporabi za pridobivanje električne energije za pokritje osnovnih obremenitev;
Considers anaerobic digestion to be especially useful for bio-waste because it yields nutrient-rich soil improver, digestate, and also biogas, which is renewable energy that can be converted to biomethane or used to generate base-load electricity;
meni, da je povezanost sežiganja bioloških odpadkov s pridobivanjem energije pomemben pogoj za to, da postane sežiganje bioloških odpadkov sprejemljiva možnost v hierarhiji ravnanja z odpadki,
Believes that, in order for bio-waste incineration to become a viable alternative in the waste hierarchy, a crucial prerequisite is that it be coupled with energy recovery;