natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2009 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o osrednjih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) v letu 2007, predloženem Evropskemu parlamentu ob uporabi točke 43 oddelka G Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 ( 2008/2241(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 19 February 2009 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in 2007, presented to the European Parliament in application of point G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 ( 2008/2241(INI) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila (2007) Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o osrednjih vidikih in temeljnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP), predloženega Evropskemu parlamentu ob uporabi točke 43 oddelka 43 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom , Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju UL C 139, 14.6.2006, str.
having regard to the annual report (2007) from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), presented to the European Parliament in application of point G, paragraph 43 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije, ki jo je sprejel Evropski svet dne 12. in 13. decembra 2003,
having regard to the European Security Strategy (ESS) adopted by the European Council of 12 and 13 December 2003,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 14. aprila 2005 UL C 33 E, 9.2.2006, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 14 April 2005 OJ C 33 E, 9.2.2006, p.
, 2. februarja 2006 UL C 288 E, 25.11.2006, str.
, 2 February 2006 OJ C 288 E, 25.11.2006, p.
, 23. maja 2007 UL C 102 E, 24.4.2008, str.
, 23 May 2007 OJ C 102 E, 24.4.2008, p.
in 5. junija 2008 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0254 .
and 5 June 2008 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0254 .
o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in temeljnih usmeritvah SZVP,
on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of CFSP,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6-0019/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6–0019/2009 ),
ker je jasna opredelitev skupnih interesov EU nujna za uresničevanje ciljev zunanjega delovanja EU in zlasti ciljev njene SZVP,
whereas a clear definition of the common interests of the EU is essential in order to attain the goals of the EU's external action and in particular those of its CFSP,
ker je EU, kadarkoli je nastopala enotno, imela veliko avtoriteto, dosegla oprijemljive rezultate in imela znaten vpliv na tek dogodkov, ta vpliv pa je sorazmeren z njeno gospodarsko močjo,
whereas whenever the EU has spoken with one voice it has enjoyed substantial authority, achieved tangible results and exercised considerable influence on the course of events, an influence commensurate with its economic power,
ker skupna zunanja in varnostna politika, ki se danes lahko zanese na širok spekter ustaljenih operativnih orodij, vstopa v novo dobo, ki jo zaznamujeta večji poudarek na strateškem razmišljanju in aktivnost glede na jasno začrtane prednostne naloge,
whereas the CFSP, which now relies on a wide range of consolidated operational tools, is entering a new stage, marked by an increased emphasis on strategic thinking and clearly prioritised action,
ker EU zato, da bi izboljšala učinkovitost in skladnost svojih ukrepov pri svetovnem dogajanju, potrebuje predvsem sredstva zunanje politike, ki jih predvideva lizbonska pogodba; ker pa bi bilo vseeno treba praktične možnosti, ki jih ponujata veljavni pogodbi, skupaj s skupno politično voljo uporabiti za krepitev institucionalne doslednosti zunanjih dejavnosti EU,
whereas, in order to improve the effectiveness and consistency of its action on a global stage, the EU needs, first and foremost, the foreign policy tools provided for by the Lisbon Treaty; whereas, none the less, all the practical possibilities offered by the current Treaties, coupled with a strong common political will, should be used to strengthen the institutional coherence of the EU's external action,
ker sta Svet in Komisija že prevzela pobudo za spodbujanje večje medsebojne sinergije in boljšo usklajenost; ker bi si moral zato Parlament podobno prizadevati, da bi preprečil notranjo razdrobljenost na področju zunanjih odnosov,
whereas the Council and the Commission have already taken initiatives towards promoting greater synergy and consistency between themselves; whereas Parliament should therefore undertake similar efforts to avoid internal fragmentation in the area of external relations,
poudarja, da morajo SZVP podpirati in voditi vrednote, ki jih cenijo EU in njene države članice, zlasti demokracija, pravna država in spoštovanje človekovega dostojanstva, človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter spodbujanje miru in učinkovitega multilateralizma;
Reiterates that the CFSP must be underpinned and guided by the values which the EU and its Member States cherish, notably democracy, the rule of law and respect for the dignity of the human person, for human rights and for fundamental freedoms, as well as the promotion of peace and effective multilateralism;
poudarja, da mora EU uporabiti SZVP v boju za skupne interese svojih državljanov, vključno s pravico državljanov, da živijo v miru in varnosti v čistem okolju ter imajo raznolik dostop do bistvenih virov, kot je energija;
Underlines that the EU must use the CFSP to fight for the common interests of its citizens, including their right to live in peace and security in a clean environment and to have diversified access to vital resources such as energy;
trdno verjame, da lahko Evropska unija naredi močan vtis le, če nastopa enotno, če ima na razpolago primerna sredstva, če okrepi svoje sodelovanje z ZN in če ji je priznana trdna demokratična legitimnost, ki izvira iz osveščenega pregleda, ki ga – vsak na svoji ravni – izvedejo Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti v skladu z njihovimi pooblastili; v zvezi s tem verjame, da bi moral Evropski parlament vabiti člane odborov za zunanje zadeve in obrambo nacionalnih parlamentov na redna srečanja, da s primernimi analitičnimi orodji in metodami proučijo glavne dogodke na področju SZVP; meni, da bi bila potrebna nova prizadevanja za povečanje osveščenosti državljanov EU glede SZVP;
Strongly believes that the EU can make an impact only if it speaks with one voice, if it is equipped with appropriate instruments, if it further strengthens its cooperation with the UN, and if it is granted the robust democratic legitimacy which results from informed scrutiny by both the European Parliament and national parliaments acting at their respective levels and in accordance with their own mandates; believes in this respect that members of the committees on foreign affairs and defence of national parliaments should be invited by the European Parliament to meet it regularly in order to scrutinise, on the basis of appropriate analytical tools and methodologies, the main developments in the CFSP; takes the view that fresh efforts should be made to raise the awareness of EU citizens with regard to the CFSP;
meni tudi, da bi bilo treba pregledati strukturo in organizacijo Parlamenta, da bi zbral in bolje izkoristil vse strokovno znanje v zvezi z vprašanji SZVP ter tako učinkoviteje in bolj usklajeno prispeval k razvoju bolj strateške in bolj demokratične SZVP;
Is also of the opinion that Parliament's structures and organisation should be reviewed in order to pool together and better exploit all expertise in matters relating to CFSP, so as to provide a more effective and coherent contribution to the development of a more strategic and democratic CFSP;
obžaluje dejstvo, da je proračun SZVP veliko prenizek, in opozarja, da bi bilo treba SZVP, zato da bi bila verodostojna in da bi izpolnjevala pričakovanja državljanov EU, dodeliti sredstva, ki bi bila sorazmerna z njenimi cilji;
Regrets the fact that the CFSP budget is seriously under-funded and recalls that, in order to be credible and respond to the expectations of EU citizens, the CFSP must be allocated resources commensurate with its objectives and specific targets;
pozdravlja redna posvetovanja o SZVP med Parlamentom in predsedstvom Sveta, ki so predvidena v zgoraj navedenem Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu ; poudarja pa, da bi moral biti namen teh srečanj tudi priložnost za izmenjavo mnenj o prihodnjih potrebah, nameravanih ukrepih na področju SZVP ter o srednje- in dolgoročnih strategijah EU v tretjih državah;
Welcomes the regular holding of CFSP consultation meetings between Parliament and the Presidency of the Council as provided for by the above-mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement; stresses, nevertheless, that these meetings should be understood as an opportunity to exchange views on the forthcoming needs, on the intended actions in the field of CFSP and on medium and long-term strategies of the EU in third countries;
bi želel od Sveta več informacij o ukrepih, ki se financirajo iz njegovega proračuna ali prek mehanizma ATHENA, zlasti pa o tem, kako zadevna sredstva dopolnjujejo sredstva za ukrepe SZVP v okviru proračuna EU;
Would welcome more information from the Council on the activities financed by the Council's budget or via the ATHENA mechanism, and particularly on how the appropriations concerned complement the funds for CFSP actions under the EU budget;
zahteva, naj ima proračunski organ in organ za podeljevanje razrešnice popoln vpogled v proračun SZVP; ponovno izraža svojo zaskrbljenost glede prakse prenašanja neporabljenih sredstev v poglavju SZVP ter poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament pravočasno obvesti o notranjih prerazporeditvah, zlasti zato, ker je večina zadevnih misij SZVP, ne samo misija EU (EUMM) v Gruziji ali misija EULEX na Kosovu, občutljive politične narave in obravnava krize, s katerimi je javnost dobro seznanjena;
Requests that the CFSP budget be fully transparent to the budgetary and discharge authority; reiterates its concerns about the practice of carrying over unspent appropriations under the CFSP chapter, and calls on the Commission to inform Parliament in due time about internal transfers, especially since most of the CFSP missions concerned, not least the EU Monitoring Mission (EUMM) in Georgia or the EU Rule of Law Mission (EULEX) in Kosovo, are of a sensitive political nature and address well publicised crises;
Letno poročilo Sveta za leto 2007 o SZVP
The Council's 2007 Annual Report on the CFSP
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se poročilo Sveta tokrat prvič sistematično sklicuje na resolucije, ki jih je sprejel Parlament; obžaluje pa, da Svet ne načenja vsebinskega dialoga o pogledih, ki jih predstavi Parlament, prav tako se ne sklicuje na te resolucije v operativnih dokumentih, kot so skupni ukrepi in skupna stališča;
Notes with satisfaction that, for the first time, the Council's report systematically refers to the resolutions adopted by Parliament; regrets, however, that the Council does not engage in a substantive dialogue on the views advanced by Parliament, nor does it refer to those resolutions in operational documents such as joint actions or common positions;
meni, da bi letno poročilo Sveta, namesto same vsebine z izčrpnim seznamom izvedenih dejavnosti, moralo dati možnost, da se vzpostavi dialog s Parlamentom s ciljem izdelave bolj strateškega pristopa k SZVP, ki bo temeljil na določitvi glavnih izzivov, in opredelitve prednostnih nalog za prihodnje ukrepe;
Is of the opinion that, rather than content itself with providing an exhaustive catalogue of the activities carried out, the Council's annual report should provide the opportunity to establish a dialogue with Parliament aimed at developing a more strategic approach to the CFSP, based on the identification of the main challenges, and defining priorities and objectives for future action;
zato poziva Svet, naj ponovno preuči osnovo in specifično obliko poročila, da zagotovi, da vključuje poglobljeno oceno politike Unije do tretjih držav ali regionalnih blokov in odziv Unije na humanitarne in varnostne krize, pa tudi specifične predloge za prihodnje ukrepe;
Therefore urges the Council to reconsider the general rationale and the specific format of the report in order to ensure that it includes an in-depth assessment of the EU's policy towards third countries or regional blocs and the EU's response to humanitarian and security crises, as well as specific proposals for future action;
meni, da bodo prihodnji meseci EU nudili edinstveno priložnost, da z novim vodstvom ZDA oblikuje novo čezatlantsko agendo, ki bo pokrivala strateška vprašanja v skupnem interesu, kot so denimo bolj vključujoč in učinkovit nov svetovni red, ki bo temeljil na močnejših večstranskih organizacijah, finančna kriza, vzpostavitev novega sklopa evro-atlantskih institucij ter globokega in celovitega čezatlantskega trga, ukrepi za rešitev vprašanja podnebnih sprememb, zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo, spodbujanje trajnega miru na Bližnjem vzhodu, razmere v Iranu, Iraku in Afganistanu, boj proti terorizmu in organiziranemu kriminalu, neširjenje jedrskega orožja in jedrska razorožitev ter razvojni cilji tisočletja;
Believes that the coming months will provide a unique opportunity for the EU to work out a new transatlantic agenda with the new US administration, covering strategic issues of common concern, such as a new, more inclusive and more effective global governance based on stronger multilateral organisations, the financial crisis, the establishment of a new set of Euro-Atlantic institutions and of a deep and comprehensive transatlantic market, measures to tackle climate change, energy security, the promotion of a durable peace in the Middle East, the situation in Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, the fight against terrorism and organised crime, nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament, and the Millennium Development Goals;
Horizontalni vidiki SZVP
CFSP horizontal aspects
meni, da bi se morala SZVP še naprej osredotočati na podpiranje človekovih pravic, spodbujanje miru in varnosti v evropski soseski in na svetovni ravni, podporo učinkovitemu multilateralizmu in spoštovanju mednarodnega prava, boj proti terorizmu, neširjenje orožja za množično uničevanje in razorožitev, podnebne spremembe in zanesljivost oskrbe z energijo, saj ta vprašanja pomenijo največje izzive za naš planet in so zato neposredno povezana s skrbmi evropskih državljanov;
Believes that the CFSP should continue to focus on upholding human rights, on promoting peace and security in Europe's neighbourhood and at global level, on support for effective multilateralism and respect for international law, on the fight against terrorism, on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and disarmament, and on climate change and energy security, since these issues constitute the greatest challenges to our planet and hence directly relate to the concerns of European citizens;
v povezavi z ugrabitvami in umori talcev, ki jih izvajajo islamski teroristi, poudarja potrebo po okrepljenemu sodelovanju in usklajevanju protiterorističnih politik med državami članicami EU, ZDA in NATO, predvsem za izboljšanje učinkovitosti reševalnih akcij, ki se izvajajo z namenom reševanja življenj talcev;
In relation to the kidnapping and murder of hostages by Islamic terrorists, underlines the need for enhanced cooperation and coordination of anti-terrorist policy as between EU Member States, the US and NATO, aiming in particular at improving the effectiveness of rescue operations launched with a view to saving hostages' lives;
poziva Svet, naj odločno sledi priporočilom Parlamenta za razvoj skupne evropske zunanje politike o energiji, zlasti s spodbujanjem enotnosti Evropske unije na pogajanjih z dobavitelji energije ter tranzitnimi državami in zaščito skupnih interesov EU z razvijanjem učinkovite diplomacije na področju energetike, učinkovitejših mehanizmov odzivanja na krizne razmere ter z zagotavljanjem diverzifikacije dobaviteljev energije, trajnostno uporabo energije in razvojem obnovljivih virov energije;
Calls on the Council to pursue with determination the recommendations made by Parliament for the development of a common European external energy policy, in particular by promoting EU cohesion in negotiations with energy suppliers and transit countries and defending EU common interests, by developing effective energy diplomacy and more efficient mechanisms for responding to crisis situations and, finally, by ensuring the diversification of energy supplies, sustainable energy use and the development of renewable energy sources;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se pri reviziji evropske varnostne strategije, ki je v teku, upoštevajo novi izzivi na področju varnosti, kot so denimo zanesljiva oskrba z energijo, podnebne spremembe in spletna varnost, ter želi izboljšati kakovost izvajanja same strategije; v zvezi s tem je seznanjen z razpravo o prihodnosti evropske varnosti, ki so jo začeli Svet, Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti držav članic; poudarja, da bi morale te razprave, v katere so vključene EU, Rusija, ZDA in države članice Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi, ki niso članice EU, graditi na dosežkih in vrednotah EU, kot je izraženo v členu 11 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter navedeno v Helsinški sklepni listini in Pariško listini, ter si sploh ne bi smele prizadevati za temeljito spremenjeno strukturo;
Welcomes the fact that the current revision of the ESS takes into account new security challenges, such as energy security, climate change and cyber-security, and aims at improving the quality of implementation of the strategy itself; notes in this context the debate initiated by the Council, the European Parliament and Member States' national parliaments on the future of European security; emphasises that, far from pursuing a radically new architecture, those discussions, involving the EU, Russia, the USA and non-EU member states of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, should build on the achievements and values of the EU, as expressed in Article 11 of the Treaty on European Union and embodied by the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris;
meni tudi, da vojna v Gruziji potrjuje potrebo po tem, da se v okviru revizije evropske varnostne strategije še naprej razvija preventivna diplomacija EU, ki jo bodo spremljala ustrezna sredstva za preprečevanje kriznih situacij, vključno z instrumentom stabilnosti, načrtovanjem dela v nepredvidenih razmerah in zanesljivim dolgoročnim financiranjem, in potrebo po tem, da EU v celoti izkoristi svoje sposobnosti in izkušnje pri obvladovanju nesreč in kriznih situacij;
Believes also that the war in Georgia confirms the need for further development, within the framework of the revision of the ESS, of EU preventive diplomacy, matched by adequate crisis-prevention tools, including the Instrument for Stability, contingency planning and reliable long-term funding, and the need to make full use of the EU's capabilities and experience in managing disasters and crises;
opozarja, da je utrditev rešitve vprašanja statusa Kosova bistvena za doseganje stabilnost na zahodnem Balkanu; zato pozdravlja soglasje, doseženo na srečanju Varnostnega sveta ZN dne 26. novembra 2008, s katerim je bila odobrena razmestitev misije EULEX po vsem Kosovu, ter poziva Svet, naj v sodelovanju z Začasno upravo misije Združenih narodov na Kosovu (UNMIK) zagotovi jasne delovne odnose in gladko predajo poslov med obema misijama na področju pravne države; poziva EULEX, da zagotovi hitre rezultate na področju boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu in pregona obtoženih vojnih zločinov; poleg tega izraža podporo delu posebnega predstavnika EU na Kosovu in ga spodbuja, da nadaljuje z izvajanjem svojega mandata ter spodbuja duh pragmatičnega sodelovanja med organi v Prištini in Beogradu v korist srbskih skupnosti, ki živijo na Kosovu;
Recalls that the consolidation of the post-status Kosovo is essential for the achievement of stability in the Western Balkans; welcomes, therefore, the consensus reached in the UN Security Council on 26 November 2008 , which has allowed the deployment of EULEX throughout Kosovo, and urges the Council, in cooperation with the UN Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK), to achieve a clear working relationship and a smooth handover between the two missions in the area of the rule of law; calls on EULEX to deliver quick results in the area of the fight against organised crime and the prosecution of those accused of war crimes; furthermore, expresses its support for the work of the EU Special Representative in Kosovo and encourages him to continue to implement his mandate and to promote a spirit of pragmatic cooperation between the authorities in Priština and those in Belgrade, for the benefit of the Serb communities living in Kosovo;
ponovno zatrjuje, da je cilj EU v Bosni in Hercegovini (BiH) še vedno zagotovitev stabilne, mirne in večetnične države, ki je na gotovi poti do članstva v EU; spodbuja politične voditelje BiH, da izvajajo sporazum z dne 8. novembra 2008 za hitro izpolnjevanje preostalih ciljev in pogojev, ki jih je določil Svet za uresničevanje miru, za prehod od urada visokega predstavnika do urada posebnega predstavnika Evropske unije do sredine leta 2009; izraža zaskrbljenost glede morebitnega umika mednarodne skupnosti iz BiH; meni, da lahko do konca mednarodne prisotnosti dejansko pride le v popolnem soglasju z organi BiH ter ko bo BiH končno postala stabilna država z dobro delujočimi institucijami;
Reasserts that the EU's objective in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) remains to ensure a stable, peaceful and multi-ethnic country irreversibly on track to EU membership; encourages BiH's political leaders to implement the agreement reached on 8 November 2008 in order to rapidly address the remaining objectives and conditions set by the Peace Implementation Council for the transition from the Office of the High Representative to the EU Special Representative's office by mid-2009; expresses its concern at the possible disengagement on the part of the international community from BiH; believes in fact that the end of international involvement can only take place in full agreement with the BiH authorities and once BiH finally becomes a stable state with well-functioning institutions;