natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob spoštovanju demokratične volje grške skupnosti na Cipru znova izraža obžalovanje, da ni bilo mogoče doseči rešitve problema, in poziva turške oblasti, naj ohranijo svojo konstruktivno naravnanost pri iskanju odgovora na ciprsko vprašanje, ki bi vodil k nepristranski rešitvi, na osnovi Annanovega načrta in načel, na katerih temelji EU, in naj v skladu z ustreznimi resolucijami OZN čim prej po določenem časovnem razporedu umaknejo svoje sile; meni, da je umik turških sil nujen korak na poti k nadaljnjemu umirjanju razmer, ponovni vzpostavitvi dialoga med stranema in pripravi trajne rešitve; znova poziva obe strani na Cipru, naj ponovno začneta pogovore pod vodstvom OZN o celovitem reševanju spora;
Expresses once again, whilst respecting the democratic will of the Greek Cypriot community, its regret that it has not been able to reach a solution, and calls on the Turkish authorities to maintain their constructive attitude in finding a settlement of the Cyprus question leading to an equitable solution, to be negotiated on the basis of the Annan plan and the principles upon which the EU is founded, and to effect an early withdrawal of its forces, pursuant to the relevant UN resolutions, in accordance with a specific timetable; believes that such a withdrawal of Turkish forces is a necessary step forward on the way to further easing tension, resuming dialogue between the parties and preparing for a lasting solution; reiterates its call on all parties in Cyprus to resume the UN-led talks on a comprehensive settlement to the conflict;
poudarja, da je hitra normalizacija odnosov med Turčijo in vsemi državami članicami EU, vključno s turškim priznanjem Republike Cipra, nujen sestavni del pristopnega procesa; poudarja, da se o turškem priznanju Republike Cipra nikakor ni moč pogajati; poziva turške oblasti, naj normalizirajo odnose med Turčijo in vsemi državami članicami EU in čim prej priznajo Republiko Ciper, ter poudarja, da bi neizpolnjevanje tega imelo resne posledice za pogajanja, lahko pa bi celo povzročilo njihovo ustavitev;
Emphasises that a rapid normalisation of relations between Turkey and all EU Member States, including Turkey's recognition of the Republic of Cyprus, is a necessary component of the accession process; stresses that Turkey's recognition of the Republic of Cyprus can in no way be the subject of the negotiations; calls on the Turkish authorities to normalise relations between Turkey and all EU Member States and recognise the Republic of Cyprus as soon as possible, and stresses that failure to do so will have serious implications for the negotiation process and could even lead to a halting of the negotiation process;
poziva tudi Svet, naj uresniči svoje obljube in konča izolacijo turške skupnosti na Cipru; poziva Svet, naj si pod britanskim predsedstvom ponovno prizadeva za dosego sporazuma o paketu finančne pomoči ter o predpisih za olajšanje trgovine v zvezi s severnim delom Cipra, da bi EU upoštevala svojo zavezanost do turške skupnosti na Cipru;
Calls on the Council also to deliver on promises and to put an end to the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community; calls on the Council, under the current UK Presidency, to make renewed efforts to reach agreement on the financial aid package and on trade facilitation regulations concerning the northern part of Cyprus in order that the EU honour its own commitments with respect to the Turkish Cypriot community;
pozdravlja sprejetje in uveljavitev šestih pomembnih delov zakonodaje dne 1. junija 2005, kar je Evropski svet decembra 2004 postavil kot pogoj za začetek pogajanj; je še vedno zaskrbljen zaradi nekaterih delov sprejetih zakonov, zlasti zaradi obtožb javnega tožilca proti Orhanu Pamuku, ki kršijo Evropsko konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic, ter poziva turško vlado, da zagotovi svobodo mišljenja in da izvede nadaljnje reforme kazenskega zakonika, še posebej člena 301(1); prav tako izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi člena 305 turškega kazenskega zakonika, ki kriminalizira "dejanja proti temeljnim nacionalnim interesom" in uredbe o izvajanju prava družb, ki vsebuje številne omejitve, med drugim predhodno odobritev tujega financiranja; resni pomisleki ostajajo tudi o nezadostnih zakonskih predlogih glede delovanja verskih skupnosti (zakon o ustanovah);
Welcomes the adoption and entry into force on 1 June 2005 of six important pieces of legislation, a step which was established by the European Council in December 2004 as a condition for the opening of the negotiations; notes that concerns remain about certain elements of the laws adopted, is in particular concerned about the complaints made by the public prosecutor against Orhan Pamuk which are in breach of the European Convention of Human Rights, and calls on the Turkish Government to guarantee freedom of opinion and to further reform the penal code with regard, in particular, to Article 301/1 thereof; also expresses its concern about Article 305 of the Turkish Penal Code, which criminalises 'acts against the fundamental national interest', and a regulation implementing the law on associations, which retains a number of restrictions, including a priori authorisation of foreign funding; notes that serious concerns also remain regarding the insufficient legal proposals regarding the functioning of religious communities (Law on Foundations);
vztraja, da bi moral pogajalski okvir odražati politične prednostne naloge, ki jih je Evropski parlament omenil v številnih resolucijah, v katerih Turčijo poziva k izpolnjevanju vseh političnih meril: stabilnost institucij, ki zagotavljajo demokracijo, pravno državo in človekove pravice ter spoštovanje in varstvo pravic manjšin; zato zahteva, da se pred vsakim krogom pogajanj na ministrski ravni poda ocena političnih meril tako v teoriji kot praksi, s čimer se izvaja stalni pritisk na turške oblasti, da ohranjajo hitrost sprejemanja nujnih reform; nadalje meni, da je za izpolnitev političnih meril treba določiti celoten program jasnih ciljev, časovni okvir in roke;
Insists on the fact that the negotiating framework should reflect the political priorities referred to by the European Parliament in its various resolutions calling on Turkey to satisfy fully the following political criteria: stability of institutions guaranteeing democracy, the rule of law, human rights and respect for, and protection of, minorities; asks therefore for each session of the negotiations at ministerial level to be preceded by an assessment of the political criteria in both theory and practice, thus exerting permanent pressure on the Turkish authorities to maintain the pace of the necessary reforms; considers, furthermore, that a full programme of clear targets, timeframes and deadlines should be fixed for the fulfilment of political criteria;
poziva Svet, da v celoti spoštuje vse dele pogajalskega okvira, ki je določen v sklepih z zasedanja Evropskega sveta z dne 17. decembra 2004; v tem okviru zlasti poudarja, da je skupni cilj pogajanj pristop in da so pogajanja odprt proces, katerega izida ni mogoče zagotoviti vnaprej; ob upoštevanju vseh kopenhagenskih meril velja, da je treba v primeru, ko država kandidatka ni sposobna prevzeti vseh obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz članstva, zagotoviti, da je ta država kandidatka kar najtesneje in v celoti zasidrana v evropskih strukturah;
Calls on the Council to respect fully all elements of the framework for negotiations as laid down in the conclusions of the meeting of the European Council of 17 December 2004; emphasises in particular in this framework that the shared objective of the negotiations is accession, that these negotiations are an open-ended process, the outcome of which cannot be guaranteed in advance, that while taking account of all Copenhagen criteria, if the candidate State is not in a position to assume in full all the obligations of membership, it must be ensured that the candidate State concerned is fully anchored in the European structures through the strongest possible bond;
v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in nacionalnim parlamentom držav članic EU letno poročata o napredku Turčije pri izpolnjevanju političnih meril, v to poročilo pa vključita vse preverjene primere mučenja, prijavljene v danem letu, ter število turških prosilcev za azil, ki so jih v danem letu sprejele države članice EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Council in this context to report annually to the European Parliament and the national parliaments of the EU Member States on the progress made by Turkey in fulfilling the political criteria, and to include in this report all verified cases of torture reported in that year and the number of Turkish asylum seekers accepted by the EU Member States during that year;
poziva Komisijo, naj v primeru hudega in stalnega kršenja načel svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, pravic manjšin ter pravne države, ki bi se zgodilo po začetku pogajanj o posameznih poglavjih, po posvetu z Evropskim parlamentom v skladu s Pogodbo o Evropski uniji priporoči začasno prekinitev pogajanj;
Urges the Commission, once the negotiations on the various chapters have started, to recommend, in the event of a serious and persistent breach of the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, the rights of minorities and the rule of law, and after consultation of the European Parliament, the suspension of negotiations, in line with the Treaty on European Union;
ugotavlja, da je mogoče vpliv turškega pristopa k EU na proračun v celoti oceniti šele po opredelitvi parametrov za finančna pogajanja s Turčijo v okviru finančne perspektive od leta 2014 dalje;
Notes that the budgetary impact of Turkey's accession to the EU can only be fully assessed once the parameters for the financial negotiations with Turkey have been defined in the context of the financial perspective from 2014 onwards;
poudarja, da priporočila Komisije za pogajanja o dolgih prehodnih obdobjih, posebnih ureditvah na področjih, kot so strukturne politike in kmetijstvo, ter trajnih varovalih za prost pretok delavcev ne bi smela negativno vplivati na prizadevanja Turčije za uskladitev s pravnim redom EU;
Stresses that the Commission's recommendation to negotiate long transition periods, specific arrangements in areas such as structural policies and agriculture and permanent safeguards for the free movement of workers in the accession agreement should not have a negative impact on Turkey's efforts to align with the acquis ;
poudarja, da bo začetek pogajanj prvi korak v dolgotrajnem procesu, ki je že po svoji naravi odprt proces in ki ne vodi "a priori" in samodejno k pristopu; vendar poudarja, da je cilj pogajanj članstvo Turčije v EU, uresničevanje te ambicije pa je odvisno od prizadevanj na obeh straneh; tako pristop ni samodejna posledica začetka pogajanj;
Stresses that the opening of negotiations will be the starting point for a long-lasting process, which by its very nature is an open-ended process and does not lead 'a priori' and automatically to accession; emphasises, however, that the objective of the negotiations is Turkish EU membership, but that the realisation of this ambition will depend on the efforts of both sides; accession is thus not the automatic consequence of the start of the negotiations;
poudarja, da Pogodba iz Nice ni sprejemljiva osnova za nadaljnje odločitve o pristopu novih držav članic in zato vztraja, da je treba nujne reforme uveljaviti v okviru ustavnega postopka;
Emphasises that the Nice Treaty is not an acceptable basis for further decisions on the accession of any further new Member States and therefore insists that the necessary reforms be brought into force within the framework of the constitutional process;
opozarja, da je v skladu s sklepi Evropskega sveta v Kopenhagnu leta 1993 sposobnost Unije, da sprejme Turčijo ob ohranjanju zagona evropske integracije pomembno vprašanje v splošnem interesu Unije in Turčije, med pogajanji podpira Komisijo pri nadzorovanju sposobnosti Unije, da sprejme Turčijo, in zato opozarja Komisijo na zahtevo, vključeno v zadnji resoluciji Evropskega parlamenta o napredku Turčije glede pristopa, ki je bila sprejeta 15. decembra 2004, naj nadaljuje študijo vplivov v letu 2005, kar bo zagotovilo koristne podatke o tem pomembnem vidiku;
Recalls that, in accordance with the conclusions of the Copenhagen European Council in 1993, the Union's capacity to absorb Turkey while maintaining the momentum of European integration is an important consideration in the general interest of both the Union and Turkey; supports the Commission in monitoring during the negotiations the Union's capacity to absorb Turkey, and therefore reminds the Commission of its demand, included in the last European Parliament resolution on Turkey's progress towards accession, adopted on 15 December 2004, to receive the follow-up to the impact study in 2005, which would provide useful information about this important aspect of the question;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, generalnemu sekretarju Sveta Evrope, predsedniku Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in vladi ter parlamentu Turčije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and Commission, the Secretary-General of the Council of Europe, the President of the European Court of Human Rights and the Government and Parliament of Turkey.
– Jerzy Buzek, Janusz Lewandowski in Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Jerzy Buzek, Janusz Lewandowski and Jacek Emil Saryusz-Wolski on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Dariusz Rosati, Józef Pinior in Jan Marinus Wiersma v imenu skupine PSE
– Dariusz Rosati, Józef Pinior and Jan Marinus Wiersma on behalf of the PSE Group
– Bronisław Geremek in Janusz Onyszkiewicz v imenu skupine ALDE
– Bronisław Geremek and Janusz Onyszkiewicz on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Milan Horáček, Joost Lagendijk in Angelika Beer v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
– Milan Horáček, Joost Lagendijk and Angelika Beer on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
– Wojciech Roszkowski, Brian Crowley, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis in Cristiana Muscardini v imenu skupine UEN
– Wojciech Roszkowski, Brian Crowley, Guntars Krasts, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis and Cristiana Muscardini on behalf of the UEN Group
o 25. obletnici Solidarnosti in njenem sporočilu Evropi
on the 25th Anniversary of Solidarity and its message for Europe
D. ker opozarja, da so bile množične stavke, ki so jih vodili delavci julija in avgusta 1980 v številnih poljskih mestih, izraz zavračanja podjarmljenosti totalitarnemu sistemu,
recalling that the mass strikes led by workers which took place in many Polish cities in July and August 1980 were an expression of rejection of a system of totalitarian enslavement,
G. ker opozarja na sporočilo, ki ga je v imenu skupnega boja za človekove pravice v tem delu Evrope na delovno ljudstvo vzhodne Evrope naslovila prva konvencija Solidarnosti,
recalling the message to working people of Eastern Europe addressed by the First Convention of Solidarność in the name of the common fight for human rights in that part of Europe,
K. ker priznava, da je poljski moto „ni svobode brez Solidarnosti“ pomemben za celo Evropo in svet,
acknowledging that the Polish motto 'there is no liberty without Solidarity' is important for the whole of Europe and the world,
ker izraža prepričanje, da so bili zgodovinski dogodki avgusta 1980 pomembni za celo Evropo in da stavko ladjedelniških delavcev v Gdansku ter gdanski sporazum lahko obravnavamo kot začetek padca komunističnega sistema, konca hladne vojne, konca razdeljenosti Evrope in padca berlinskega zidu,
expressing the belief that the historic events of August 1980 were significant for the whole of Europe, and that the strike of shipyard workers in Gdańsk, as well as the Gdańsk Accords, may be treated as the beginning of the collapse of the Communist system, the end of the Cold War, the end of the division of Europe and the fall of the Berlin Wall,
izraža najgloblje spoštovanje in hvaležnost poljskim delavcem in vsem ljudem srednje in vzhodne Evrope, ki so se borili za človekove pravice, svobodo, solidarnost in enotnost Evrope
Expresses its deepest esteem and gratitude to the Polish workers and to all people of Central and Eastern Europe who fought for human rights, freedom, solidarity and the unity of Europe;
priznava, da bi z razglasitvijo 31. avgusta za dan svobode in solidarnosti počastili spomin na ta boj in bi ga uvrstili v skupni evropski spomin
Recognises that, in order to commemorate this effort and to place it in the collective memory of Europe, 31 August is to be celebrated as the Day of Freedom and Solidarity;
poziva Evropsko komisijo in Evropski svet naj dvigata ozaveščenost o Solidarnosti kot delu evropske vzgoje in kulture
Calls on the Commission and the Council to raise awareness that Solidarność is part of European education and culture;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the parliaments and governments of the Member States.
– Barbara Kudrycka, Bogdan Klich, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi in Karl von Wogau, v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Barbara Kudrycka, Bogdan Klich, Árpád Duka-Zólyomi and Karl von Wogau, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Jan Marinus Wiersma, Józef Pinior in Joseph Muscat v imenu skupine PSE
– Jan Marinus Wiersma, Józef Pinior and Joseph Muscat, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Konrad Szymański in Inese Vaidere, v imenu skupine UEN
– Anna Elzbieta Fotyga, Konrad Szymański and Inese Vaidere, on behalf of the UEN Group
o položaju v Belorusiji
on Belarus
upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o razmerah v Belorusiji,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus,
ob upoštevanju izjav o Belorusiji, ki jih je v imenu EU dalo predsedstvo 2. avgusta 2005, 12. avgusta 2005 in 30. avgusta 2005,
having regard to the statements by the Presidency on behalf of the EU on Belarus issued on 2 August 2005, 12 August 2005 and 30 August 2005,
ob upoštevanju člena 103 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 103(4) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker se je položaj v Belorusiji, namesto da bi se izboljšal, še dodatno poslabšal do takšne mere, da so človekove pravice kršene brezobzirno in v posmeh vsem, da je spodnji dom brez vsakršne zakonodajne pravice in gospodarstvo vodi sam predsednik; ker te kršitve vključujejo zapor in druge oblike represije, usmerjene proti članom demokratične opozicije,
whereas, instead of improving, the situation in Belarus has further deteriorated, which has led to a situation where human rights are blatantly violated, the Lower House is deprived of its legislative rights, and economic life is controlled by the President; whereas these violations include imprisonment of members of the democratic opposition and other forms of repression used against them,
ker je bilo v zadnjih nekaj letih več političnih strank, 22 neodvisnih časopisov, več kot 50 demokratičnih NVO z različnih področij in različnih političnih prepričanj in več izobraževalnih ustanov zaprtih zaradi "tehničnih" razlogov, vendar je bilo pri vseh primerih jasno, da so bile te organizacije kaznovane zaradi kritičnosti do predsednika in njegove politike,
whereas over the past few years several political parties, 22 independent newspapers, more than 50 pro-democracy NGOs of different levels and different political persuasions and several educational establishments have been closed down for 'technical' reasons, but whereas it was clear that in every case these organisations were being punished for criticising the President and his policy,
ker je beloruski minister za pravosodje Viktar Halavanau izdal uredbo o obvezni prijavi zvez političnih strank, sindikatov, koalicij, državljanskih pobud in gibanj z namenom, da prepreči združitev političnih sil, ki bodo podprle morebitnega tekmeca Aleksandra Lukašenka na predsedniških volitvah prihodnje leto,
whereas Viktar Halavanau, Justice Minister of Belarus, has issued a decree on obligatory registration of blocs of political parties, trade unions, coalitions, civil initiatives and movements, with the aim of preventing the unification of political forces that would support a challenger to Aleksandr Lukashenko in next year's presidential election,
ker je 13. septembra 2005 beloruski predsednik Lukašenko izdal uredbo, s katero je sam sebi podelil pravico do pomilostitve kaznivih dejanj, povezanih z lastnino, kar je le še en korak v smeri monopolizacije vseh pristojnosti v državi, vključno s sodno oblastjo,
whereas on 13 September 2005 Belarus President Lukashenko issued a decree granting himself the right to pardon property-related crimes in yet another move to further monopolise all power in the country, including judicial authority,
ker je Komisija ZN za človekove pravice aprila 2005 na Belorusijo naslovila kritiko zaradi stalnih poročil o nadlegovanju in zapiranju nevladnih organizacij, organizacij nacionalnih manjšin, neodvisnih medijskih izpostav, opozicijskih političnih strank, neodvisnih sindikatov in verskih organizacij ter nadlegovanju posameznikov, ki se ukvarjajo z demokratičnimi dejavnostmi, tudi v neodvisnih medijih,
whereas in April 2005 the UN Commission on Human Rights criticised Belarus on account of persistent reports of harassment and closure of non-governmental organisations, national minority organisations, independent media outlets, opposition political parties, independent trade unions and religious organisations, and the harassment of individuals engaged in democratic activities, including independent media,
ker je zapiranje neodvisnih univerz v Belorusiji privedlo do slovesne otvoritve Evropske univerze za humanistične vede za beloruske študente v izgnanstvu v Vilniusu,
whereas the closure of independent universities in Belarus led to the inauguration of the European Humanities University for Belarussian students in exile in Vilnius,
ker so politične aretacije in sodni procesi aktivistov demokratičnega gibanja in neodvisnih novinarjev ter deportacije tujih državljanov v Belorusiji redna praksa,
whereas politically motivated arrests and trials of activists belonging to the democratic movement and independent journalists and deportations of foreign citizens are continually taking place in Belarus,
ker ni bilo nikakršnega napredka v nerešenih primerih številnih izginulih oseb,
whereas no progress has been made in the unsolved cases of a number of disappeared persons,
ker je Ministrstvo za pravosodje Belorusije 12. maja vodstvo Združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji spoznalo za nezakonito in ker je tiskarna, ki ji daje navodila vlada, zavrnila tiskanje poljskega tednika "Glos znad Niemna" in ker so bile pod okriljem vlade natisnjene ponarejene izdaje,
whereas on 12 May the leadership of the Union of Poles in Belarus was declared illegitimate by the Belarussian Ministry of Justice and a printing plant, instructed by the government, refused to print the Polish weekly 'Glos znad Niemna' and fake issues were printed under the umbrella of the government,
ker je Lukašenkov režim 27. avgusta sklical upravni odbor Združenja Poljakov v Belorusiji ter izsilil odstop demokratičnega in zakonito izvoljenega vodstva ter ga zamenjal z režimu podrejenim odborom,
whereas on 27 August the Lukashenko regime called a board meeting of the Union of Poles in Belarus to force the resignation of the democratic, and legally elected, leadership in order to replace them with a board compliant with the regime's wishes,
ker je pravica do svobodne obveščenosti onemogočena v vseh televizijskih programih, nacionalnih in regionalnih, ki so v rokah vlade, medtem ko internetne povezave tečejo preko korporacije, ki jo vodi država, ta pa zapira številne račune in spletne strani,
whereas the exercise of the right to freedom of information is thwarted, whereas all television programmes, both national and regional, are in government hands, and whereas all Internet connections are through a state-run corporation which has blocked numerous accounts and websites,