natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o pobudi Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske in Zvezne republike Nemčije z namenom sprejetja Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o izvrševanju odločb, izdanih v nenavzočnosti, in spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami, Okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni, Okvirnega sklepa 2006/783/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi in Okvirnega sklepa 2008/.../PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji (5598/2008 – C6-0075/2008 – 2008/0803(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution, of 2 September 2008, on the initiative by the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany with a view to adopting a Council Framework Decision on the enforcement of decisions rendered in absentia and amending Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders and Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union (5598/2008 – C6-0075/2008 – 2008/0803(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju pobude Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske ter Zvezne republike Nemčije (5598/2008),
having regard to the initiative by the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany (5598/2008),
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0075/2008 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0075/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0285/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0285/2008 ),
odobri pobudo Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske ter Zvezne republike Nemčije, kakor je bila spremenjena;
Approves the initiative by the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany as amended;
poziva Svet, naj se ponovno posvetuje s Parlamentom, če namerava bistveno spremeniti pobudo Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske ter Zvezne republike Nemčije;
Calls on the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the initiative by the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany substantially;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj po pričetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe dasta prednost prihodnjim predlogom sprememb sklepa v skladu z Izjavo št. 50 o členu 10 Protokola o prehodnih odločbah, ki bo priložen Pogodbi o Evropski uniji, Pogodbi o delovanju Evropske unije in Pogodbi o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, to give priority to any future proposal to amend the Decision in accordance with Declaration No 50 concerning Article 10 of the Protocol on transitional provisions to be annexed to the Treaty on European Union, to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community;
je odločen, da bo obravnaval vse tovrstne predloge po nujnem postopku v skladu s postopkom, opisanim v odstavku 5 in v tesnem sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti;
Is determined to examine any such future proposal by the urgent procedure in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 5 and in close cooperation with national parliaments;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam Republike Slovenije, Francoske republike, Češke republike, Kraljevine Švedske, Slovaške republike, Združenega kraljestva Velike Britanije in Severne Irske ter Zvezne republike Nemčije.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments of the Republic of Slovenia, the French Republic, the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Sweden, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany.
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga 7 držav članic
Text proposed seven Member States
v nenavzočnosti
on the enforcement of decisions rendered in absentia
in spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/584/PNZ o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami, Okvirnega sklepa 2005/214/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni, Okvirnega sklepa 2006/783/PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi, Okvirnega sklepa 2008/.../PNZ o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji
and amending Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties, Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders, Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union
, in Okvirnega sklepa 2008/…/PNZ o priznavanju pogojnih kazni, alternativnih sankcij in pogojnih odložitev izreka kazni ter zagotavljanju nadzora nad njimi
, and Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA on the recognition and supervision of suspended sentences, alternative sanctions and conditional sentences
Z uporabo ukrepov na ravni EU, s katerimi bi se zagotovila večja usklajenost in vzajemno priznavanje sodb v kazenskih zadevah, in s sprejetjem določenih določb in praks v kazenskih zadevah na tej ravni je treba okrepiti medsebojno zaupanje v evropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v kazenskih zadevah.
It is necessary to strengthen mutual trust in the European area of freedom, security and justice in criminal matters by means of measures at European Union level designed to ensure greater harmonisation and mutual recognition of judgments in criminal matters and by adopting at that level some provisions and practices in criminal matters.
Za vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah so nujen pogoj ustrezna postopkovna jamstva
Adequate procedural safeguards are a necessary precondition for the mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters.
Zato so potrebne jasne in skupne rešitve, ki bi opredelile razloge za zavrnitev in določile manevrski prostor izvršilnega organa.
It is therefore necessary to provide clear and common solutions which define the grounds for refusal and the discretion left to the executing authority.
Zato so potrebne jasne in skupne rešitve, ki bi opredelile razloge za zavrnitev
It is therefore necessary to provide clear and common solutions which define the grounds for refusal
izvršitve odločbe, izdane po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča,
of the execution of a decision rendered following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person
in določile manevrski prostor izvršilnega organa.
and the discretion left to the executing authority.
Namen okvirnega sklepa je določiti takšne skupne razloge, ki bi izvršilnemu organu omogočili izvršitev odločbe kljub temu, da zadevna oseba na sojenju ni bila navzoča.
The purpose of this Framework Decision is to define such common grounds in order to allow the executing authority to execute a decision despite the absence of the person concerned at the trial.
Z izpolnitvijo ustrezne rubrike evropskega naloga za prijetje in predajo ali ustreznega potrdila iz drugih okvirnih sklepov organ izdaje zagotovi, da so bile ali bodo izpolnjene zahteve, ki naj bi zadostovale za izvršitev odločbe na podlagi načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
By completing the relevant section of the European arrest warrant or of the relevant certificate under the other Framework Decisions, the issuing authority gives an assurance that the requirements have been or will be met, which should be sufficient for the purposes of the execution of a decision on the basis of the principle of mutual recognition.
V skupnih rešitvah glede razlogov za
Common solutions on grounds for
v obstoječih zadevnih okvirnih sklepih bi morala biti upoštevana raznolikost razmer
in the relevant existing Framework Decisions should take into account the diversity of situations with regard to
na področju obvestitve obtožene
informing the accused person of his right to a retrial
Priznanje in izvršitev odločbe, izdane po sojenju, na katerem obdolženec ni bil navzoč, se ne bi smela zavrniti, če je na podlagi informacij države izdajateljice mogoče ustrezno sklepati, da je bil obdolženec osebno povabljen ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščen o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja.
The recognition and execution of a decision rendered following a trial at which the defendant did not appear in person should not be refused if, on the basis of the information provided by the issuing State, it is satisfactorily established that the defendant was summoned in person, or by other means actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial.
Pri tem se razume, da je morala biti zadevna oseba obveščena pravočasno, kar pomeni dovolj zgodaj, da bi se lahko udeležila sojenja in učinkovito uveljavila svojo pravico do obrambe.
In this context it is understood that the person should have received such information in good time, i. e. sufficiently in advance to allow him or her to participate in the trial and to effectively exercise his or her right of defence.
Vse informacije morajo biti na voljo v jeziku, ki ga obdolženec razume.
All information should be provided in a language which the defendant understands.
Priznanje in izvršitev odločbe, izdane po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, se ne bi smela zavrniti, če je zadevno osebo, ki je bila seznanjena z načrtovanim sojenjem, na sojenju zastopal pravni zastopnik, ki ga je za to posebej pooblastila, s čimer je bila zagotovljena praktična in učinkovita pravna pomoč.
The recognition and execution of a decision following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person should not be refused where the person concerned, being aware of the scheduled trial, was defended at the trial by a legal counsellor to whom he or she had given an explicit mandate to do so, thus ensuring that the legal assistance was practical and effective.
Na ponovnem sojenju, ki sledi obsodbi po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča, mora biti ta oseba v enakem položaju kot nekdo, ki se mu sodi prvič.
At a retrial following a conviction resulting from a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person, that person should be in the same position as someone standing trial for the first time.
Zato bi morala imeti zadevna oseba pravico, da je navzoča na ponovnem sojenju, vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi pa bi se morala (ponovno) preučiti, pri čemer ponovno sojenje lahko vodi do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe, tožena stranka pa se lahko zoper novo odločbo pritoži.
Therefore the person concerned should have the right to be present at the retrial, the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, should be (re)examined, the retrial could lead to the original decision being quashed and the defendant may appeal against the new decision.
Ta okvirni sklep ne spreminja niti obveznosti spoštovanja temeljnih pravic in temeljnih pravnih načel iz člena 6 Pogodbe
This Framework Decision shall not have the effect of modifying the obligation to respect fundamental rights and fundamental legal principles as enshrined in Article 6 of the Treaty
o Evropski uniji
on European Union
niti obveznosti, ki so v tem smislu naložene pravosodnim organom.
, and any obligations incumbent upon judicial authorities in this respect shall remain unaffected.
V področje uporabe tega okvirnega sklepa sodi določitev splošnih pravil za priznavanje in/ali izvrševanje odločb v eni državi članici (država članica izvršiteljica), ki jih izda druga država članica (država članica izdajateljica)
The scope of this Framework Decision is to establish common rules for the recognition and/or execution of judicial decisions in one Member State (the executing Member State) issued by another Member State (the issuing Member State) following
člena 9(1)(f) Okvirnega sklepa 2008/…/PNZ.
Article 9(1)(f) of Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA.
, ki je
a trial
in člena [9(1)(h)] Okvirnega sklepa 2008/…/PNZ.
and in Article [9(1)(h)] of Framework Decision 2008/…/JHA
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 1 – odstavek 4
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 1 – paragraph 4
Za namene tega okvirnega sklepa "odločba, izdana v nenavzočnosti," pomeni zaporno kazen ali ukrep, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, če se oseba ni udeležila postopka, iz katerega izhaja ta odločba."
For the purpose of this Framework Decision, 'decision rendered in absentia' shall mean a custodial sentence or a detention order when the person did not personally appear in the proceedings resulting in that decision."
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 4a – naslov in odstavek 1
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 4a – title and paragraph 1
v nenavzočnosti
in absentia
po sojenju, na katerem zadevna oseba ni bila navzoča
following a trial at which the person concerned did not appear in person
Izvršilni sodni organ lahko tudi zavrne izvršitev evropskega naloga za prijetje, ki je bil izdan za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, če je bila odločba izdana
The executing judicial authority may also refuse to execute the European arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order, if the decision was rendered
, razen če je v evropskem nalogu za prijetje navedeno, da je zadevna oseba:
, unless the European arrest warrant states that the person:
, v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice
, in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 4a –odstavek 1 – točka a
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 4a – paragraph 1 – point a
ki se je zaključila z odločbo, izdano v nenavzočnosti, ter bila
the hearing which led to the decision rendered in absentia
o dejstvu,
about the fact that such a
obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju
by other means actually received official information about
je bilo mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem,
that trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial,
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 4a – odstavek 1 – točka a a (novo)
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 4a – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
(aa) after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
, izdana v nenavzočnosti,
rendered in absentia
in je bila izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja
and being expressly informed about the right to a retrial
in pravici da je prisotna na tem sojenju
and to be present at that trial
v jeziku, ki ga je razumela,
, in a language which he or she understood,
o pravici do ponovnega sojenja
about the right to a retrial
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe
not contest the decision
, izdane v nenavzočnosti
rendered in absentia
(ii) ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja v ustreznem roku, ki je vsaj
(ii) did not request a retrial in the applicable timeframe which
(ii) ni zahtevala ponovnega sojenja
(ii) did not request a retrial
ali vložila pritožbe
or an appeal
(*Sprememba velja za celotno besedilo.
This amendment applies throughout the text.
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 4a – odstavek 1 – točka c
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 4a – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) ji odločba
(c) was not personally served with the decision
(i) ji bo vročena
(i) will be served with it
(i) ji bo
(i) will be
takoj in v vsakem primere najkasneje v treh dneh
immediately and in any event not later than three days
po predaji
after the surrender and will be expressly informed
ter bo v jeziku, ki ga razume,
in a language which he or she understands
izrecno obveščena o pravici do ponovnega sojenja
about the right to a retrial
ali do pritožbe
or an appeal
kjer ima pravico sodelovati in kjer se bo lahko vsebina primera, vključno z novimi dokazi, (ponovno) preučila, kar bi lahko vodilo do razveljavitve prvotne odločbe
in which he or she will have the right to participate, which will allow the merits of the case, including fresh evidence, to be (re)examined and which may lead to the original decision being quashed
[…]¹ dni, da zahteva
to request a retrial.
ponovno sojenje
a retrial
ali vložiti pritožbo
or appeal
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Člen 4a – odstavek 1 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Article 4a – paragraph 1 a (new)
Če je evropski nalog za prijetje in predajo izdan za izvršitev zaporne kazni ali ukrepa, ki vključuje odvzem prostosti, v skladu s pogoji iz odstavka (1)(c) in če zadevna oseba pred tem ni bila uradno obveščena o kazenskem postopku proti njej, lahko ob prejetju obvestila o vsebini evropskega naloga za prijetje in predajo pred predajo zahteva kopijo sodbe.
If a European arrest warrant is issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or detention order under the conditions set out in paragraph (1)(c) and the person concerned has not previously received any official information about the existence of the criminal proceedings against him or her, that person, when he or she is informed about the content of the European arrest warrant, may request a copy of the judgment before being surrendered.
Pravosodni organ izdaje, takoj ko je o zahtevi obveščen, posreduje kopijo sodbe osebi, ki je to zahtevala, prek izvršilnega sodnega organa.
Immediately after having been informed of that request, the issuing judicial authority shall provide a copy of the judgment via the executing judicial authority to the person who made the request.
Če je sodba v jeziku, ki ga zadevna oseba ne razume, pravosodni organ izdaje prek izvršilnega sodnega organa posreduje povzetek sodbe v jeziku, ki ga oseba razume.
If the judgment is rendered in a language which the person concerned does not understand, the issuing judicial authority via the executing judicial authority shall provide an extract from the judgment in a language which the person concerned understands.
Posredovanje sodbe ali povzetka sodbe zadevni osebi je le informativnega značaja in se ga ne more tolmačiti kot uradno storitev v okviru sodbe oziroma ne sproži nobenih časovnih rokov za zahtevanje ponovnega sojenja ali vložitev pritožbe.
The provision of the judgment or an extract from the judgment to the person concerned shall be for information purposes only; it shall not be construed as constituting formal service of the judgment nor shall it activate any time-limits applicable for requesting a retrial or appeal.
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Priloga – polje d – uvodni del in točki 1 in 2 (d)
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Annex – box d – introductory part and points 1 and 2 (d)
Navedite, ali je bila
Indicate if the
odločba izdana v nenavzočnosti
decision was rendered in absentia
oseba navzoča na sojenju, ki se je zaključilo z odločbo
person appeared in person at the trial resulting in the decision
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Priloga – polje d – točka 2 – podtočka 2.1
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Annex – box d – point 2 - subpoint 2.1
pravočasno in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice
through a competent representative and in due time
izdano v nenavzočnosti,
rendered in absentia
in obveščena
and informed
o dejstvu
about the
, da se
fact that
ne udeleži
not appear
2.1 je bila oseba
2.1 the person was
osebno povabljena ali
summoned in person or
in v skladu z nacionalnim pravom države članice izdajateljice o načrtovanem datumu in kraju
in accordance with the national law of the issuing Member State, about the scheduled date and place of the
, ki se je
which led to the decision
sicer tako, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila oseba seznanjena z načrtovanim datumom in krajem sojenja in je bila osebno
was personally
Kdaj in kje
Time and place when and where the person was summoned or
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Priloga – polje d – točka 2 – podtočka 2.1 a (novo)
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Annex – box d – point 2 - subpoint 2.1 a (new)
2.1a je oseba po tem, ko je bila neposredno osebno povabljena ali kako drugače dejansko uradno obveščena o načrtovanem datumu in kraju sojenja na način, da je mogoče nedvoumno sklepati, da je bila seznanjena s sojenjem, izrecno pooblastila pravnega zastopnika, ki ga je izbrala, določila in plačala ali ga je določila in plačala država v skladu s svojim nacionalnim pravom, ki se uporablja pri uveljavljanju pravice do obrambe, in jo je zastopnik dejansko zastopal na sojenju;
2.1a after having been directly summoned in person or by other means having actually received official information about the scheduled date and place of the trial in such a manner that it was unequivocally established that he or she was aware of the trial, had given an explicit mandate to a legal counsellor who was chosen, appointed and paid by the person concerned or who was appointed and paid by the State in accordance with its national law applicable to the rights of the defence, and was indeed defended by that counsellor during the trial;
Navedite, kako je bil ta pogoj izpolnjen:
Provide information on how this condition was met:
Okvirni sklep 2002/584/PNZ Priloga – polje d – točka 2 – podtočka 2.2
Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA Annex – box d – point 2 - subpoint 2.2
izdane v nenavzočnosti,
, expressly stated that he or she
izrecno izjavila, da ne izpodbija odločbe
expressly stated that he or she
Opišite, kdaj in kako je
not contest the decision