natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Nevladne organizacije – predlagateljice projektov se je spodbujalo k temu, da so partnerje iskale med raziskovalnimi inštituti, organi pregona, javnimi organi in šolami, pa tudi mediji, katerih sodelovanje je boju proti nasilju lahko zelo koristilo.
NGOs that proposed projects were encouraged to find partners among research institutes, law enforcement bodies, public authorities and schools, and also the media, as their cooperation could be extremely useful in combating violence.
Programa Daphne II in Daphne III sta se začela izvajati v letu 2004 oziroma 2007 s povprečnim letnim proračunom 10 milijonov EUR (Daphne II) oziroma 16,7 milijona EUR (Daphne III).
The Daphne II and Daphne III programmes were launched in 2004 and 2007 respectively, with an average annual budget of EUR 10 million for Daphne II and EUR 16.7 million for Daphne III.
Program Daphne III (2007–2013) je deloval v okviru splošnega programa „Temeljne pravice in pravosodje“.
The Daphne III programme (2007-2013) formed part of the general programme ‘Fundamental Rights and Justice’.
Program je odprt za sodelovanje nevladnih organizacij, javnih organov in institucij (večinoma univerz in raziskovalnih inštitutov) vseh 27 držav članic EU.
The programme is open to NGOs, public authorities and institutions (mainly universities and research institutions in the 27 EU Member States).
Zelo pozitivna ocena, čeprav je ponekod potrebnih nekaj prilagoditev
A very positive result with just a few adjustments needed
Od leta 1997 je bilo izvedenih več kot 500 projektov, katerih podrobnosti je mogoče najti na spletni strani Komisije Daphne Toolkit
Over 500 projects have been implemented since 1997, details of which can be found on the Commission’s Daphne Toolkit website
Program je vzbudil veliko zanimanje nevladnih organizacij, ki so Komisiji predložile veliko več predlogov, kot je bilo projektov, ki jih je bilo mogoče financirati z dodeljenimi proračunskimi sredstvi.
NGOs showed a great deal of interest in the programme and submitted a far higher number of proposals to the Commission than could be funded from the programme’s budget.
Ti projekti so se nanašali na različna področja, kot je spolno, psihološko in fizično nasilje v različnih okoljih (ustanovah, šolah, družini).
Projects focused on a variety of fields, such as sexual, psychological or physical violence in various settings (institutions, schools, family).
Posebej uspešni so bili projekti, ki so obravnavali nevarnosti deskanja po internetu za otroke, nekatere manj znane vedenjske motnje, ki mlade vodijo k samopoškodovanju, zdravstvene potrebe žensk, ki so bile žrtve trgovine z ljudmi, pohabljenje ženskih spolnih organov, preprečevanje otroške pornografije in pojav psihičnega nasilja (ustrahovanja, ang. „bullying“) v šolah.
Some of the most successful projects have dealt with the risks children face in surfing the Internet, certain little-known behavioural problems causing self-mutilation among young people, the health needs of women victims of trafficking, female genital mutilation, stopping child pornography, and bullying in schools.
Poročilo o vmesni oceni programa Daphne z dne 11. maja 2011 je opozorilo na nekatere vidike, ki jih je za izvajanje programa do leta 2013 treba nekoliko prilagoditi v skladu s predlaganimi priporočili.
The interim evaluation report of 11 May 2011 on the Daphne Programme mentioned a few points where it recommended some adjustments in implementation of the programme up to 2013.
Nazadnje je bila izražena zahteva za osredotočenje programov na prednostna področja delovanja EU.
Finally, the report called for the programmes to be refocused on the EU’s policy priorities.
V ta namen poročilo zagovarja predvsem financiranje manj številnih, a obsežnejših projektov.
To this end, it recommended funding fewer projects but selecting ones on a larger scale.
Prihodnost programa
The programme ’ s future
Komisija že predvideva sprejetje ukrepov za odpravo težav, na katere opozarja vmesno poročilo, da se bodo izvajale skladne in učinkovite politike.
The Commission is already planning to take measures to remedy the problems highlighted in the interim report, so that policies implemented are consistent and effective.
Svoje namere glede programov nove generacije, kot sta program „Pravosodje“ in „Program za pravice in državljanstvo“, bo natančno predstavila v dveh predlogih sklepa, ki bi jih morala predložiti sredi novembra 2011 v okviru svežnja o večletnem finančnem okviru 2014–2020.
The Commission will clarify its intentions regarding the new-generation programmes ‘Justice’ and ‘Rights and Citizenship’ in the two proposals for a decision it is due to present in mid-November 2011 as part of the package for the 2014-2020 multiannual financial framework.
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Silvia Costa, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Iratxe García Pérez, Zita Gurmai, Mikael Gustafsson, Mary Honeyball, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Raül Romeva i Rueda, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Silvia Costa, Tadeusz Cymański, Edite Estrela, Iratxe García Pérez, Zita Gurmai, Mikael Gustafsson, Mary Honeyball, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Siiri Oviir, Antonyia Parvanova, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Nicole Sinclaire, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Marc Tarabella, Britta Thomsen, Marina Yannakoudakis
Kent Johansson, Christa Klaß, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Angelika Werthmann
Kent Johansson, Christa Klaß, Mariya Nedelcheva, Angelika Werthmann
s predlogom priporočila Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o dosledni politiki do režimov, proti katerim EU uporablja omejevalne ukrepe, kadar njihovi voditelji izvršujejo svoje osebne in gospodarske interese znotraj meja EU
with a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on a consistent policy towards regimes against which the EU applies restrictive measures, when their leaders exercise their personal and commercial interests within EU borders
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA B7‑0235/2011..............................................................................12
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B7‑0235/2011...................................................12
o dosledni politiki do režimov, proti katerim EU uporablja omejevalne ukrepe, kadar njihovi voditelji izvršujejo svoje osebne in gospodarske interese znotraj meja EU
on a consistent policy towards regimes against which the EU applies restrictive measures, when their leaders exercise their personal and commercial interests within EU borders
– ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga predlaga Graham Watson v imenu skupine ALDE o dosledni politiki do režimov, proti katerim EU uporablja omejevalne ukrepe, kadar njihovi voditelji izvršujejo svoje osebne in gospodarske interese znotraj meja EU ( B7-0235/2011 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Graham Watson on behalf of the ALDE Group, on a consistent policy towards authoritarian regimes, against whom the EU applies restrictive measures, when they exercise their personal and commercial interests within EU borders ( B7-0235/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov, zlasti njenih členov 1 in 25 ter členov 39 in 41 poglavja VII te listine,
– having regard to the UN Charter and specifically Articles 1 and 25 and, in Chapter VII, Articles 39 and 41 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju konvencij Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah in izbirnih protokolov,
– having regard to the United Nations human rights conventions and the optional protocols,
– ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah ter njegovih dveh izbirnih protokolov,
– having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the two optional protocols,
– ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah),
– having regard to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the European Convention on Human Rights),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1674 iz aprila 2006, ki potrjuje določbe iz zaključnega dokumenta svetovnega vrhunskega srečanja iz leta 2005 o odgovornosti za zaščito prebivalstva pred genocidom, vojnimi zločini, etničnim čiščenjem in zločini proti človeštvu,
– having regard to UNSC Resolution 1674 of April 2006 which reaffirms the provisions of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document regarding the responsibility to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity,
– ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu”, ki jo je sprejel Evropski svet 12. decembra 2003,
– having regard to the European Security Strategy (ESS) entitled ‘A secure Europe in a better world’, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003,
– ob upoštevanju resolucij Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov št. 1267 (1999) o razmerah v Afganistanu in št. 1371 (2001) o razmerah v Nekdanji jugoslovanski republiki Makedoniji,
– having regard to Resolutions 1267 (1999) on the situation in Afghanistan and 1371 (2001) on the situation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC),
– ob upoštevanju členov 21(2), 22 in 36 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
– having regard to Articles 21(2), 22 and 36 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),
– ob upoštevanju člena 215 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o izvrševanju sklepov o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Ustanovitev sestave za sankcije znotraj delovne skupine svetovalcev za zunanje zadeve (RELEX/sankcije) z dne 22. januarja 2004 (5603/2004),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘Establishment of a Sanctions formation of the Foreign Relations Counsellors Working Party (RELEX/Sanctions)’ of 22 January 2004 (5603/2004),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Osnovna načela o uporabi omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) z dne 7. junija 2004 (10198/1/2004),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘Basic Principles on the Use of Restrictive Measures (Sanctions)’ of 7 June 2004 (10198/1/2004),
– ob upoštevanju sodbe Evropskega sodišča v zadevi Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation proti Svetu in Komisiji (ECR 11-3533 (2005)),
– having regard to the European Court of Justice judgment in Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission (ECR 11-3533 (2005)),
– ob upoštevanju okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2006/783/PNZ z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odredb o zaplembi
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2006/783/JHA of 6 October 2006 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to confiscation orders
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Najboljše prakse EU za učinkovito izvajanje omejevalnih ukrepov z dne 9. julija 2007 (11679/2007),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures’ of 9 July 2007 (11679/2007),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Izvajanje skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP z dne 21. julija 2007 (10826/1/07REV 1),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘Implementation of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP’ of 21 July 2007 (10826/1/07REV 1),
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Posodobitev najboljših praks EU za učinkovito izvajanje omejevalnih ukrepov z dne 24. aprila 2008 (08666/1/08/REV 1),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘Update of the EU Best Practices for the effective implementation of restrictive measures’ of 24 April 2008 (08666/1/08/REV 1),
– ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta 2009/67/SZVP z dne 26. januarja 2009 o posodobitvi Skupnega stališča 2001/931/SZVP o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu in razveljavitvi Skupnega stališča 2008/586/SZVP
– having regard to Council Common Position 2009/67/CFSP of 26 January 2009 updating Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and repealing Common Position 2008/586/CFSP
UL L 23, 27.1.2009, str.
OJ L 23, 27.1.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom Smernice za izvajanje in ocenjevanje omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU, nazadnje pregledane 15. decembra 2009 (17464/09),
– having regard to the Council document entitled ‘Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU Common Foreign and Security Policy’, last reviewed on 15 December 2009 (17464/09),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 4. septembra 2008 o oceni sankcij EU kot delu dejavnosti in politik EU na področju človekovih pravic
– having regard to its resolution of 4 September 2008 on the evaluation of EU sanctions as part of the EU’s actions and policies in the area of human rights
UL C 295 E, 4.12.2009, str.
OJ C 295 E , 4.12.2009, p.
UL L 309, 25.11.2005, str.
OJ L 309, 25.11.205, p.15 ,
– ob upoštevanju člena 121(3) poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 121(3) of the Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0007/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0007/2012 ),
Splošne ugotovitve o ukrepih EU proti avtoritarnim voditeljem
General observations on the EU approach towards authoritarian leaders
A. ker novi člen 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, kot ga uvaja člen 1(24) Lizbonske pogodbe, priznava, da ukrepanje Unije temelji na demokraciji, pravni državi, univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, spoštovanju človekovega dostojanstva, načelih enakosti in solidarnosti ter spoštovanju načel Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov in mednarodnega prava;
A. whereas the new Article 21 of the TEU, as introduced by Article 1(24) of the Treaty of Lisbon, recognises that the Union’s actions shall be guided by ‘democracy, the rule of law, the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, respect for human dignity, the principles of equality and solidarity and respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter and international law’;
B. ker se sankcije uporabljajo za uresničevanje ciljev skupne zunanje in varnostne politike (SZVP) iz člena 21 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki vključujejo spodbujanje mednarodnega miru in varnosti, spoštovanja človekovih pravic, temeljnih svoboščin in pravne države ter krepitev demokracije in dobrega upravljanja;
B. whereas sanctions are applied in pursuit of CFSP objectives as set out in Article 21 of the TEU which include promoting international peace and security, respect for human rights, fundamental freedoms, rule of law and consolidating democracy and good governance;
C. ker sankcije ali omejevalni ukrepi v okviru SZVP veljajo za prisilne ukrepe pred uporabo sile, kot so embargo na orožje, trgovinske sankcije, finančne in gospodarske sankcije, zamrznitev sredstev, prepoved poletov, omejevanje vstopa, diplomatske sankcije, bojkotiranje športnih in kulturnih dogodkov ter prenehanje sodelovanja s tretjo državo;
C. whereas, within the framework of the CFSP, sanctions or restrictive measures are regarded as coercive measures short of force, such as arms embargoes, trade sanctions, financial and economic sanctions, freezing of assets, flight bans, restrictions on admission, diplomatic sanctions, boycotts of sports and cultural events and suspension of cooperation with a third country;
D. ker je uporaba sankcij in omejevalnih ukrepov učinkovita le, če je del skladne in splošne strategiji Evropske unije in njenih držav članic na področju človekovih pravic;
D. whereas the application of sanctions and restrictive measures is effective only if this forms part of a cohesive overarching EU and Member State strategy on human rights;
E. ker so „ciljno usmerjene sankcije“ oblika osebnih sankcij, selektivnih gospodarskih sankcij in diplomatskih ukrepov, kot so prepoved izdaje vizumov, zamrznitev sredstev, embargo na izvoz ali uvoz določenega blaga, prepoved letenja, prepoved vlaganja in omejitev uradnih stikov;
E. whereas ‘targeted sanctions’ exist in the form of personal sanctions, selective economic measures and diplomatic measures, such as visa bans, asset freezes, embargos on the export or import of specific commodities, flight bans, investment bans or the limitation of official contacts;
F. ker nesoglasje med državami članicami pogosto povzroči neskladno izvajanje omejevalnih ukrepov, kar škodi verodostojnosti EU in učinkovitosti teh ukrepov;
F. whereas disagreement among Member States often leads to inconsistent application of restrictive measures which damages the EU’s credibility and has a detrimental impact on the efficiency of those measures;
G. ker je EU svojo politiko sankcij pogosto uporabljala neskladno in s tem tretje države, kjer je stanje človekovih pravic in demokracije podobno, obravnavala različno, kar je sprožilo kritike na račun dvojnih meril;
G. whereas the EU has often applied its sanctions policy inconsistently by treating third countries with similar human rights and democratic records differently, and as such has prompted criticism for applying double standards;
H. ker so nacionalne meje zaradi napredka informacijske tehnologije vse manj pomembne, možnosti za izolacijo države ali njene elite pa so v globaliziranem svetu vse manjše;
H. whereas progress in information technology makes national borders increasingly irrelevant and, in a globalised world, thus reduces the capacity to isolate a country or its elite;
I. ker je večina države, ki so tarča sankcij, države, ki so že tako najbolj izolirane od mednarodnega sistema in katerih družbe bi imele največje koristi od povečane mednarodne izpostavljenosti, saj bi spodbudila spremembe; ker imajo lahko omejevalni ukrepi, zlasti proti določenim posameznikom, v nekaterih primerih kljub temu odvračilne in psihološke učinke;
I. whereas most of the countries subjected to sanctions are those that have remained most isolated from the international system and whose societies would most benefit from enhanced international exposure for the sake of change; whereas in certain cases restrictive measures, notably against certain individuals, can nevertheless have dissuasive and psychological effects;
J. ker bi morala EU sankcije sprejeti šele po temeljiti oceni najučinkovitejših načinov za doseganje demokratičnih sprememb v državi; ker bi morale vse sklepe spremljati zadevne utemeljitve;
J. whereas decisions on sanctions by the EU should be taken only after thorough evaluation of the most efficient way to achieve democratic change in the country; whereas each decision should be accompanied by a corresponding justification;
K. ker je Evropska unija za mnoge avtoritarne voditelje in osebe, ki so z njimi povezane, privlačna za naložbe, premoženje in bančne storitve in storitve zdravstvenega varstva, ter je območje, kjer uživajo pravico do prostega gibanja in kjer lahko svobodno zapravljajo svoje, pogosto na sumljiv način pridobljeno bogastvo;
K. whereas the European Union represents to many authoritarian leaders, and persons associated with them, a source of attraction for investment, property and banking, and healthcare services, and an area in which they enjoy freedom to travel and freedom to spend their often dubiously acquired wealth;
L. ker avtoritarne voditelje priložnost, da oblast izkoristijo za osebno bogatenje, med drugim z nezakonitim prisvajanjem državnih sredstev ali osebnim nadzorom nad njimi, pogosto spodbuja k temu, da si prizadevajo ostati na oblasti in si oblast tudi nasilno prilaščajo; ker je treba izvesti dodatne študije za zmanjšanje povezav med zunanjo razvojno pomočjo oziroma drugo pomočjo ter bogatenjem avtoritarnih voditeljev in njihovih najožjih krogov;
L. whereas the opportunity for authoritarian leaders to convert power into personal wealth, often including through the misappropriation of, or personal control over, state assets, offers them the incentive and boosts their capacity to usurp and continue in power; whereas further studies are required in order to minimise any relation between foreign aid for development or other purposes and the enrichment of authoritarian leaders and their inner circles;
M. ker je brez usklajenega ukrepanja težko pridobiti natančne podatke o tem, koliko premoženja imajo avtoritarni voditelji v EU, in ker mora EU vztrajati pri iskanju teh podatkov;
M. whereas, without concerted action, accurate information on the assets of authoritarian leaders held within the EU is difficult to obtain and the EU must persevere in seeking to obtain it;
N. ker bodo voditelji, proti katerim so uvedene sankcije, prizadeti, če se bo nanje izvajal pritisk z omejevanjem njihovih zmožnosti za prenos denarja, izvajanje naložb in dostop do finančnih sredstev, omejevanjem možnosti potovanj, dostopa do posebnih dobrin, storitev ali do diplomatskega zastopanja;
N. whereas sanctioned leaders will be affected if they are personally subject to pressure in the form of restrictions on their ability to move money, invest and access their financial assets, restrictions on prospects for travel, and restrictions on access to particular goods and services or diplomatic representation;
O. ker je veliko število mednarodnih in regionalnih akterjev zahteva dialog in formalne ter neformalne mehanizme posvetovanja med temi akterji;
O. whereas the multiplicity of international and regional actors necessitates dialogue and formal and informal mechanisms for consultation between those actors;
P. ker je za učinkovito politiko do avtoritarnih režimov bistveno, da se prisilno diplomacijo, vključno z omejevalnimi ukrepi, uravnoteži z jasno komunikacijo in konstruktivnimi možnostmi, ki ne zajemajo uporabo sile, pri čemer sredstva zunanje politike EU in držav članic dajejo prednost kritičnemu in naprednemu dialogu in ne izolaciji;
P. whereas an essential aspect of an effective policy towards authoritarian regimes must balance coercive diplomacy, including restrictive measures with clear communication and constructive options not involving the use of force, with EU and Member State foreign policy resources preferring a critical and progressive dialogue over isolation;
Q. ker je postopek pregleda, med katerim se lahko sankcije razširijo, ublažijo ali odpravijo v odgovor na spremembe ukrepanja voditeljev, katerim so namenjene, ključnega pomena za učinkovitost omejevalnih ukrepov in ga je treba izvesti strogo in strateško;
Q. whereas the review procedure, in which sanctions can be expanded, eased or lifted in response to changes in the actions of targeted leaders, is crucial for restrictive measures to be effective, and must be conducted in a rigorous and strategic manner;
R. ker morajo biti vsi omejevalni ukrepi v skladu s človekovimi pravicami, mednarodnim humanitarnim pravom, pravico do poštenega postopka, načelom sorazmernosti in pravico do učinkovitih pravnih sredstev, ter ne smejo v nobenem primeru kaznovati najbolj izpostavljenih skupin prebivalcev države, ki jo ti ukrepi zadevajo;
R. whereas all restrictive measures must comply with human rights, international humanitarian law, due process, proportionality and the right to effective redress, and must on no account penalise the most vulnerable population groups in countries affected by these measures;
Oblikovanje jasnejših opredelitev
Develop clearer definitions