natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
3. poziva, naj direktiva vsebuje izrecno izjavo, da nobeni državi članici ni preprečeno spoštovanje konvencije Mednarodne organizacije dela št. 94; poziva Komisijo, naj vse države članice spodbuja k spoštovanju te konvencije; poudarja, da so za učinkovito delovanje trajnostnih javnih naročil potrebni jasni in nedvoumni predpisi EU, ki natančno opredeljujejo okvir zakonodaje držav članic in izvajanje;
Calls for an explicit statement in the directives that they do not prevent any country from complying with ILO Convention C94; calls on the Commission to encourage all Member States to comply with that Convention; stresses that the effective functioning of sustainable public procurement requires clear and unambiguous EU rules precisely defining the framework of Member States’ legislation and implementation;
5. poziva k pojasnitvi definicij v direktivah – na primer definicije pojma „oseba javnega prava“ – v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča in brez zožitve področja uporabe pravil EU za javno naročanje;
Calls for clarification of the definitions in the directives – for example the definition of a ‘body governed by public law’ – in line with the case-law of the ECJ and without reducing the scope of EU public procurement rules;
8. poudarja, da bi bilo treba ohraniti sedanjo razdelitev storitev na kategoriji A in B, kolikor so „lažje“ določbe za storitve B utemeljene z značilnostmi te kategorije, in sicer da se storitve zagotavljajo večinoma lokalno ali regionalno; poziva Komisijo, naj razvije orodja, s katerimi bodo lokalni in regionalni organi lažje določili, v katero kategorijo sodijo konkretne naročene naloge;
Emphasises that the current classification of A and B service categories should be maintained in so far as ‘lighter’ provisions for B services have their justification in the characteristics of that category as mainly locally or regionally provided services; calls on the Commission to develop tools that make it easier for local and regional authorities to decide to which category specific contract tasks belong;
14. priznava, da bi lahko bilo učinkovito uporabljeno javno naročanje resnično gonilo za spodbujanje kakovostnih delovnih mest, plač in pogojev, pa tudi za enakost, razvoj znanj, usposabljanje, spodbujanje okoljske politike ter zagotavljanje spodbud za raziskave in inovacije; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbuja vlade in naročnike k večji uporabi trajnostnih javnih naročil, ki podpirajo in spodbujajo visokokakovostno zaposlovanje ter zagotavljajo kakovostne storitve in blago v Evropi; vabi Komisijo, naj nadzoruje, kako javna naročila prispevajo k doseganju širših ciljev EU, in navede, kaj bi bilo treba storiti, da se ti cilji v prihodnje izboljšajo;
Recognises that public procurement, if used effectively, could be a real driver in promoting quality jobs, wages and conditions as well as equality, in developing skills and training, in promoting environmental policies, and in providing incentives for research and innovation; calls on the Commission to encourage governments and contracting authorities to increase the use of sustainable public procurement, supporting and promoting high-quality employment and providing quality services and goods in Europe; invites the Commission to scrutinise how public procurement has contributed to achieving the EU’s wider goals and to outline what should be done to improve these objectives in the future;
16. je seznanjen s pomenom standardov za javna naročila, ker lahko pomagajo javnim naročnikom dosegati cilje politike na učinkovit in pregleden način; v zvezi s tem poziva k razvoju redno posodabljane zbirke podatkov za standarde, zlasti v zvezi z okoljskimi in družbenimi merili, ki bi bila na razpolago javnim organom, da bi imeli naročniki pri pripravi razpisov na razpolago ustrezne smernice in jasna pravila, da bi lahko enostavno preverili njihovo skladnost z ustreznimi standardi;
Notes the importance of standards for public procurement, in that they can help public procurers to meet their policy objectives in an effective and transparent way; calls, in that regard, for the development of a regularly updated database of standards, especially in relation to environmental and social criteria, to be made available to public authorities, in order to ensure that procurers, when drawing up tenders, have access to appropriate guidance and a clear set of rules so that they can easily verify their compliance with relevant standards;
19. poudarja potrebo po krepitvi trajnostne razsežnosti javnih naročil tako, da se ji omogoči vključevanje na vseh stopnjah procesa javnih naročil (to je preskus sposobnosti, tehnične specifikacije, klavzule o izvedbi naročil);
Underlines the need to strengthen the sustainability dimension of public procurement by allowing it to be integrated at each stage of the procurement process (i.e. ability test, technical specifications, contract performance clauses);
25. poudarja, da bi bila vsaka razširitev pravil EU o javnih naročilih na vprašanje „kaj kupiti“ znatna sprememba sedanje ureditve in bi jo bilo treba podrobno preučiti; dvomi, da bi to prispevalo k poenostavitvi in racionalizaciji, pač pa se boji, da bi privedlo do bolj zapletenih pravil s številnimi izjemami, ki bi jih bilo težko uporabljati v praksi – glede na to, da so direktive o javnih naročilih postopkovne smernice („kako kupovati“), ki jih ne smejo nadomestiti določbe o tem, „kaj kupiti“;
Emphasises that any extension of the EU procurement rules into the area of ‘what to buy’ would represent a significant change to the current regime and should be carefully assessed; doubts that this would contribute to simplifying and streamlining, and fears rather that it would lead to more complicated rules, with many exemptions, which would be difficult to administer in practice – procurement directives being procedural (‘how to buy’) guidelines that should not be supplemented with provisions on ‘what to buy’;
27. ugotavlja, da bi morala politika javnega naročanja v prvi vrsti zagotavljati učinkovito rabo sredstev v državah članicah, dosegati optimalne rezultate na področju javnih naročil z uporabo jasnih, preglednih in prožnih postopkov ter omogočati evropskim podjetjem enake konkurenčne pogoje v celotni Uniji;
Notes that public procurement policy should, in the first instance, ensure the effective use of funds by the Member States, achieve optimum results in terms of public procurement through the application of clear, transparent and flexible procedures, and allow European businesses to compete on an equal footing throughout the Union;
29. se zavzema, da bi ocenili, ali se lahko postopek s pogajanji in predhodno objavo po vsej EU dovoli v večjem obsegu kakor predvidevajo sedanje direktive, tako da bi se izboljšala komunikacija med naročniki in gospodarskimi subjekti ter zagotovilo učinkovito usklajevanje ponudbe in povpraševanja; meni, da bi bilo v primeru, da se predvidijo širitve področja uporabe postopka s pogajanji, treba uvesti dodatne zaščitne ukrepe pred zlorabo, npr. obveznost naročnika, da določi vsaj nekatere minimalne pogoje v zvezi z izvajanjem postopka za vse ponudnike že na začetku, kot je to običajno tudi v premišljenem zasebnem naročanju, in določiti zahteve za pisno dokumentacijo;
Advocates assessing whether wider use of the negotiated procedure with prior EU-wide publication might be allowed, beyond that provided for in the current directives, so that contracting authorities and economic operators can communicate better, and supply and demand can be coordinated effectively; takes the view that, if any extension of the scope of the negotiated procedure is envisaged, further safeguards against abuse should be introduced – e.g. an obligation on contracting authorities to establish, for any bidder at the outset, at least some minimum conditions regarding the performance of the procedure, in line with what is sound practice in private procurement – as well as requirements for written documentation;
32. poziva Komisijo, naj v regulativni okvir o javnih naročilih uvede pojasnila, zlasti kar zadeva fazo izvajanja pogodbe (npr. o „bistveni spremembi“ veljavne pogodbe, o spremembah, ki se nanašajo na izvajalca, in o prekinitvi pogodb);
Calls on the Commission to introduce clarifications into the regulatory framework on public procurement, particularly in relation to the contract execution phase (e.g. on ‘substantial modification’ of a contract in force, on changes concerning the contractor and on the termination of contracts);
Priročnik o ekološkem – okolju prijaznem – javnem naročanju“ in „Kupujmo družbeno ozaveščeno: vodnik za upoštevanje socialnih vidikov pri javnem naročanju“, objavljena leta 2005 in 2010, v zvezi s tem nista dovolj uporabna;
A handbook on environmental public procurement’ and ‘Buying Social: A Guide to Taking Account of Social Considerations in Public Procurement’, published in 2005 and 2010 respectively, are not sufficiently useful in this respect;
Četrta naloga: izboljšan dostop za mala in srednja podjetja
Fourth task: improving access for SMEs
38. poudarja, da bi morala biti merila za izbor v zvezi s finančnim položajem, npr. glede prometa družbe, sorazmerna z naravo posameznega naročila; opozarja Komisijo in države članice, naj pri sprejemanju prožnih in uporabniku prijaznih instrumentov ne ustvarjajo novih ovir za mala in srednja podjetja ter naj prednostno upoštevajo njihove interese; poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi izboljšanja dostopa do postopkov javnih naročil in njihove preglednosti, zlasti v prid manjšim naročnikom in ponudnikom, posodobi spletno mesto „Tenders Electronic Daily“ (TED), da bo privlačnejše in prijaznejše do uporabnika, s tem pa tudi dostopnejše, obenem pa naj posebno pozornost nameni iskalnim merilom in kakovosti ter podrobnostim prevoda povzetka za vsako ponudbo; priporoča, da bi moralo spletno mesto TED uporabnikom ponuditi možnost opozarjanja, da bi bili obveščeni takoj po objavi novega razpisa;
Points out that selection criteria on financial standing, e.g. in relation to company turnover, should be proportional to the character of a given contract; warns the Commission and the Member States, when adopting flexible and user-friendly instruments, not to create any new barriers for SMEs and to take account of their interests as a matter of priority; asks the Commission, with the aim of improving access to public procurement procedures and improving their transparency, particularly for the benefit of smaller contracting authorities and tenderers, to modernise the Tenders Electronic Daily (TED) website to make it more accessible by improving its appeal and user-friendliness, with particular attention to search criteria and the quality and detail of the summary translations for each tender; recommends that TED should offer an alert service for users, to inform them when new tenders of interest are published;
40. poziva Komisijo, naj poveča ozaveščenost o pomembnosti razdeljevanja naročil po sklopih in razmisli o uporabi načela „uporabe ali razlage“, v skladu s katerim je treba pravila o zadevah, kot je razdelitev na sklope, uporabiti ali razložiti, zakaj niso bila uporabljena;
Asks the Commission to increase awareness of the importance of splitting contracts into lots, and to consider the implementation of the ‘apply or explain’ principle, whereby rules on matters such as division into lots must be complied with, or the failure to comply explained;
43. poziva Komisijo, naj za preprečevanje korupcije na področju javnih naročil spodbuja učinkovitejše prakse glede poročanja, vključno z izmenjavo informacij med državami članicami o izključitvi nepoštenih ponudnikov; poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s priporočili iz resolucije 1729(2010) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope
Calls on the Commission, with a view to fighting corruption in public procurement, to promote more efficient reporting practices, including exchanges of information between Member States on the exclusion of unsound bidders; invites the Commission to provide for clear rules on protection of whistleblowers, following the recommendations in Resolution 1729(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
Resolucija 1725(2010) parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope o zaščiti informatorjev, sprejeta 29. aprila 2010. zagotovi jasna pravila za zaščito informatorjev, poveča preglednost pogodb, ki se financirajo iz sredstev EU, ter spodbuja izobraževalne ukrepe na institucionalni ravni in za širšo javnost;
Resolution 1729(2010) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on the protection of whistleblowers, text adopted 29 April 2010. , to enhance the transparency of contracts funded with EU money and to promote educational action both at institutional level and among the general public;
46. meni, da bi morala biti javna naročila pregledna in odprta za javni nadzor, saj zadevajo javna sredstva; naproša Komisijo za pojasnitev, da se zagotovi pravna varnost lokalnim in drugim javnim organom in da lahko ti svoje državljane obvestijo o svojih pogodbenih obveznostih;
Takes the view that, since public contracts concern public funds, they should be transparent and open to public scrutiny; asks the Commission for clarification with a view to ensuring legal certainty for local and other public authorities and enabling them to inform citizens of their contractual obligations;
48. pozdravlja zeleno knjigo Komisije o razširitvi uporabe e-javnih naročil; poudarja, da akcijski načrt na področju e-javnih naročil ni dosegel svojega cilja in da je potrebno obsežnejše politično vodstvo na vseh ravneh upravljanja – vključno z ravnijo EU –, da bi ohranili in pospešili prehod na e-javna naročila; želi zagotoviti, da bo vsaj 50 % postopkov javnih naročil, ki jih izvedejo institucije EU in države članice, opravljenih po elektronski poti v skladu z zavezo, ki so jo vlade držav članic leta 2005 sprejele na ministrski konferenci o e-upravi v Manchestru;
Welcomes the Commission Green Paper on expanding the use of e-procurement; points out that the e-procurement action plan has failed to achieve its goal and that more political leadership at all levels of government – including EU level – is needed in order to maintain and accelerate the transition to e-procurement; wants to ensure that at least 50% of both the EU institutions’ and the Member States’ public procurement operations are carried out electronically, in line with the commitment made by the Member State governments at the ministerial conference on e-government in Manchester in 2005;
52. poudarja, da lahko e-javna naročila spodbudijo poenostavitev celotnega procesa javnih naročil in ustvarijo učinkovitost, ki bi povzročila bistveno zmanjšanje stroškov in prihranek časa tako za podjetja kot za javno upravo ter povečala preglednost in dostopnost; opozarja, da zlasti elektronsko oddajanje naročil odpira nove možnosti za posodobitev uprave na področju javnih naročil; ponavlja dejstvo, da bi morala biti e-naročila cenejša, hitrejša in preglednejša kakor konvencionalni postopki javnega naročanja; kljub temu meni, da so izboljšanja še vedno mogoča in da bi morali narediti več glede dostopa do zanesljivih, primerljivih in objektivnih informacij in statističnih podatkov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo čezmejno uporabo e-javnih naročil;
Underlines the point that e-procurement can drive simplification of the entire procurement process, introducing efficiencies that will lead to significant cost and time savings for both businesses and public administrations, and increasing transparency and accessibility; notes that the electronic awarding of contracts, in particular, opens up new avenues for modernising administration in the field of public contracts; reiterates that e-procurement should be less costly, more expedient and more transparent than conventional public procurement procedures; believes, however, that there is still room for improvement and that more should be done in terms of access to reliable, comparable and objective information and statistical data; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage cross-border use of e-procurement;
54. pozdravlja najavo v akcijskem načrtu Komisije za e-upravo 2011–2015, da bo platformo epractice.eu razvila v učinkovito orodje za izmenjavo izkušenj in informacij med strokovnimi delavci držav članic in e-uprave, ter poziva k razširitvi področja uporabe na lokalne in regionalne strokovne delavce;
Welcomes the announcement in the Commission’s ‘eGovernment Action Plan 2011-2015’ that the epractice.eu platform is to be developed into an effective tool for the exchange of experience and information among Member States and e-government practitioners, and urges that its scope be extended to local and regional practitioners;
Zakonodaja EU na področju javnih naročil letos praznuje okroglo obletnico.
This year marks the 40th anniversary of European public procurement law.
Pred štiridesetimi leti, 26. julija 1971, je prvič začela veljati Direktiva 71/305/EGS o javnih naročilih gradenj.
The entry into force on 26 July 1971 of Council Directive 71/305/EEC concerning the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts is an event seldom recalled.
Ta dogodek se redko omenja, pa tudi v zeleni knjigi o modernizaciji politike EU na področju javnih naročil je sklic nanj naveden le enkrat.
The Commission Green Paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy mentions the directive only once.
Tako naj bi bila 40. obletnica naposled priložnost za ovrednotenje in analizo uspehov in neuspehov politike EU na področju javnih naročil.
Nonetheless, the anniversary offers an occasion for taking stock and examining where European public procurement policy has succeeded and where it has failed.
Drugi stroški so se nasprotno povišali, kajti z enostranskim poudarjanjem pravnih vprašanj so se povišali transakcijski stroški, drago pa je bilo treba plačati tudi zunanje svetovanje.
By contrast, other costs have risen: a disproportionate emphasis on legal considerations has led to increased transaction costs, with considerable expense incurred for external consultancy services.
Poleg tega se je nehote okrepila težnja javnih organov, da se pri pravni negotovosti zatekajo v birokratske postopke, se s tem izognejo tveganjem in v primeru dvoma naročilo oddajo za najcenejše izdelke ali storitve, ne pa za najinovativnejše ali na sploh najboljše.
Another unintended consequence has been to reinforce the tendency among public contracting authorities, where any legal uncertainty is present, to rely on bureaucratic procedures, with the result that they have avoided risks and, when in doubt, have awarded contracts to the tenderers offering the cheapest products or services rather than the most innovative or simply the best.
Tak razvoj je posebno dvomljiv v časih gospodarske krize in pomanjkanja javnih sredstev.
This is a particularly problematic development in times of economic crisis when public budgets are squeezed.
Zato je dobrodošlo, če želi Komisija z revizijo poenostaviti zakonodajo EU na področju javnih naročil in jo narediti prožnejšo.
If the Commission intends, by means of this revision, to make European public procurement law simpler and more flexible, that is to be welcomed.
Toda iz priložene zelene knjige so razvidna tudi protislovja.
It is clear from the Green Paper, however, that there are certain contradictions in its approach.
Obseg 114 vprašanj in podrobnosti o njih vzbujajo vtis, da se želi poseči v mikroureditev oddaje javnih naročil, poleg tega pa so nekatera vprašanja oziroma dani predlogi protislovni.
On the one hand, the range and detail of the 114 questions give the impression that the aim is to introduce micro-regulation of public procurement.
Tako so lahko na primer kvote ali zavezujoči cilji pri pridobivanju naročil v nasprotju z navedenim ciljem poenostavitve in večje pravne varnosti ter prispevajo k nadaljnji birokratizaciji in pretiranemu zatekanju v pravo v negativnem pomenu.
On the other hand, many of the questions – and the suggestions put forward – are contradictory.
Poročevalka zastopa stališče, da bi morala revizija direktiv o javnih naročilih izhajati iz tega, da je zakonodaja EU na področju javnih naročil zdaj že ustaljena praksa v Evropi.
For example, imposing quotas or binding targets could be at odds with the stated aim of simplifying public procurement procedures and creating greater legal certainty: it could have the effect of encouraging further red tape as well as legalisation in the negative sense of that term.
Na začetku so bili potrebni strogo formalizirani postopki, da bi se vzpostavila določena strokovnost pri praksi oddaje javnih naročil in da bi se naročniki navadili na načela preglednosti, nediskriminacije in konkurence, zdaj pa je to že ustaljena praksa.
The rapporteur’s position is that any revision of the public procurement directives should proceed from the recognition that there is now considerable experience with EU public procurement law in Europe: whereas, in the early days, strictly formalised procedures were necessary in order to bring a certain degree of professionalism to public procurement practice and to accustom the contracting authorities to the principles of transparency, non-discrimination and competition, these things are nowadays common practice.
Zdaj je treba zakonodajo na področju javnih naročil znova racionalizirati in jo vrniti k njenemu dejanskemu jedru, to je zagotavljanju preglednosti, nediskriminaciji in varstvu konkurence.
What is required today is a slimming-down of public procurement law to refocus it on the core task of guaranteeing transparency and non-discrimination and safeguarding competition.
Pravna jasnost in varnost
Legal clarity and certainty
Seveda je treba revizijo izvesti previdno, kajti dobra praksa ne bi smela biti postavljena pod vprašaj – sem spada na primer razdelitev na dve direktivi oziroma podrazdelitev na gradnje, blago in storitve, pa tudi podrazdelitev na storitve A in storitve B.
Obviously the revision must be conducted with care: tried and tested practice – including not only the division of the relevant provisions into two directives and the distinctions between service, works and supply contracts but also the classification into A and B services – should not be called into question.
Posebni predpisi za storitve B temeljijo pretežno na lokalnem značaju teh storitev.
The predominantly local nature of the B services justifies the existence of special provisions in their regard.
Vendar se nejasnosti pojavljajo pri nekaterih finančnih storitvah, jasneje pa je treba urediti tudi umestitev služb za pomoč pri nesrečah.
There are, however, grey areas in relation to various types of financial service, and clearer provision is needed, too, with regard to the classification of emergency services.
Poleg tega obstajajo številne pravne nejasnosti, ki so v preteklosti povzročale vedno nove pritožbene ali sodne postopke.
There are numerous other legal grey areas that have repeatedly been the subject of complaints and litigation.
Pri oddaji javnih naročil so spori posebno pogosti, revizija pa naj bi prispevala k zmanjševanju te „kulture sporov“ in večji pravni varnosti.
Public procurement is a field particularly rife with litigation, and the revision should, inter alia, help to dismantle the existing ‘litigation culture’ and to create greater legal certainty.
Le tako je mogoče bolje in preprosteje izkoristiti možnosti oddaje javnih naročil za inovativni in trajnostni gospodarski razvoj, ki je prav v časih gospodarske krize in visokega javnega dolga zelo pomemben.
Only in this way can the potential of public procurement be more effectively and straightforwardly harnessed to promote the innovative and sustainable economic development that is so particularly important in times of economic crisis, with high levels of national debt.