natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju bistvenih novosti, o katerih so se vlade držav članic sporazumele 13. decembra 2007 in jih potrdile s podpisom Lizbonske pogodbe, med katerimi je v prvi vrsti pravno zavezujoča narava Listine o temeljnih pravicah in obvezen pristop k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP),
having regard to the innovations to which the governments of the Member States gave their agreement on 13 December 2007 by signing the Lisbon Treaty, the most significant of which are the conferral of binding legal status on the Charter and the requirement to accede to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (the ECHR),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/43/ES Sveta z dne 29. junija 2000 o izvajanju načela enakega obravnavanja oseb ne glede na raso ali narodnost UL L 180, 19.7.2000, str.
having regard to Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin OJ L 180, 19.7.2000, p.
in Direktive 2000/78/ES Sveta z dne 27. novembra 2000 o splošnih okvirih enakega obravnavanja pri zaposlovanju in delu UL L 303, 2.12.2000, str.
, Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation OJ L 303, 2.12.2000, p.
ter okvirne konvencije Sveta Evrope za varstvo narodnih manjšin,
, and to the Council of Europe's Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities,
(v nadaljevanju Agencija za temeljne pravice),
(the Agency),
ob upoštevanju poročil Agencije za temeljne pravice, Evropskega centra za spremljanje rasizma in ksenofobije ter zadevnih nevladnih organizacij,
having regard to the reports of the Agency, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia and the non-governmental organisations (NGOs) concerned,
ob upoštevanju odločitev Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice,
having regard to the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Communities (ECJ) and of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR),
ob upoštevanju letnih poročil o razmerah na področju temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji, ki jih je pripravila mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov Evropske unije,
having regard to the annual reports on fundamental rights in the European Union drawn up by the European Union's network of independent experts,
ob upoštevanju poročil organov Sveta Evrope, zlasti poročil o stanju na področju človekovih pravic parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope in komisarja Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice,
having regard to the reports by the bodies of the Council of Europe, in particular the reports on the human rights situation drawn up by the Parliamentary Assembly and the Commissioner for Human Rights,
ob upoštevanju poročil Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve o obiskih v centrih za pridržanje priseljencev, ki nimajo urejenega statusa,
having regard to the reports of its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on visits to detention centres for immigrants in an irregular situation,
ob upoštevanju resolucij s področja temeljnih in človekovih pravic,
having regard to its resolutions on fundamental rights and human rights,
ob upoštevanju javnih sej in izmenjav mnenj, ki jih je Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve organiziral kot pripravo na to poročilo, zlasti srečanj dne 8. oktobra 2007 s sodniki ustavnih in vrhovnih sodišč, 19. maja 2008 s komisarjem Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice in 6. oktobra 2008 s predstavniki nevladnih organizacij,
having regard to the series of public meetings and exchanges of views organised in preparation for the drafting of this resolution by its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, in particular those held on 8 October 2007 with constitutional and supreme court judges, on 19 May 2008 with the Council of Europe's Commissioner for Human Rights and on 6 October 2008 with representatives of NGOs,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje ( A6-0479/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Culture ( A6-0479/2008 ),
ker člen 6 Pogodbe EU navaja, da Evropska unija temelji na skupnosti vrednot in spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, kot jih zagotavlja EKČP in ki izhajajo iz skupne ustavne tradicije držav članic,
whereas Article 6 of the EU Treaty states that the European Union is based on a community of values and on respect for fundamental rights, as guaranteed by the ECHR and as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States,
ker se Evropski parlament kot neposredno izvoljen predstavnik državljanov Unije, ki jamči za njihove pravice, zaveda svoje velike odgovornosti pri uresničevanju teh načel, zlasti ker je po zdaj veljavnih Pogodbah pravica do pritožbe posameznika pred sodišči Skupnosti in pri Evropskem varuhu človekovih pravic zelo omejena,
whereas Parliament, as the directly elected representative of the citizens of the Union and guarantor of their rights, believes that it has a clear responsibility to uphold these principles, in particular as the Treaties in their current form greatly restrict the individual's right to bring actions before the Community courts and the European Ombudsman,
ker je vzpostavitev postopka nadzora nad združljivostjo zakonodajnih predlogov z Listino o temeljnih pravicah ena nujnih posledic njenega sprejetja 7. decembra 2000, kot je to priznala Komisija, ko je leta 2001 sprejela določbe s tega področja, in kot je Parlament na to opozoril ob sprejetju resolucije z dne 15. marca 2007 o spoštovanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah v zakonodajnih predlogih Komisije ter o metodologiji sistematičnega in strogega nadzora UL C 301 E, 13.12.2007, str.
whereas the introduction of a procedure for monitoring the compatibility of legislative proposals with the Charter is an inevitable consequence of its adoption on 7 December 2000, as the Commission acknowledged when adopting corresponding provisions in 2001 and as Parliament pointed out when adopting its resolution of 15 March 2007 on compliance with the Charter in the Commission's legislative proposals: methodology for systematic and rigorous monitoring OJ C 301 E, 13.12.2007, p.
ker se Lizbonska pogodba, ki je v postopku ratifikacije, izrecno sklicuje na Listino o temeljnih pravicah in ji daje enako pravno vrednost, kot jo imajo Pogodbe,
whereas the Lisbon Treaty, which is currently undergoing ratification, makes explicit reference to the Charter and confers on it the same legal value as the Treaties,
ker bodo v primeru, če bi Listina o temeljnih pravicah postala del primarne zakonodaje Unije, v njej opredeljene pravice postale zavezujoče, in sicer s sekundarno zakonodajo, s katero se bodo začele izvajati,
whereas, should the Charter be incorporated into Union primary law, the rights defined in it will acquire binding force by means of the secondary legislation implementing them,
ker je Listina o temeljnih pravicah neodvisno od svojega pravnega statusa z leti postala vir navdiha za sodno prakso evropskih sodišč, kot so Sodišče prve stopnje in Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice ter številnih ustavnih sodišč,
whereas, irrespective of its legal status, the Charter has over the years become a source of inspiration in the case-law of the European courts, such as the Court of First Instance (CFI) and the ECJ, the ECtHR and many constitutional courts,
ker je za resnično "kulturo temeljnih pravic" v Uniji treba razviti obsežen sistem nadzora nad njihovo uporabo, vanj pa vključiti Svet in odločitve, sprejete v okviru medvladnega sodelovanja, saj varovanje temeljnih pravic ne pomeni le formalnega spoštovanja pravil, pač pa predvsem njihovo dejavno uveljavljanje, pa tudi posredovanje v primeru kršitev ali nezadovoljivih ukrepov v državah članicah,
whereas the establishment of a genuine "culture of fundamental rights" in the Union calls for the development of a comprehensive system for monitoring the application of those rights, encompassing the Council and decisions taken as part of intergovernmental cooperation, in that the protection of fundamental rights does not consist solely of formal compliance with rules, but above all of their active promotion and of intervention in cases where Member States violate fundamental rights or enforce them unsatisfactorily,
meni, da sta učinkovito varovanje in uveljavljanje temeljnih pravic temelj demokracije v Evropi in predpogoj za utrditev evropskega območja svobode, varnosti in pravice;
Considers that the effective protection and the promotion of fundamental rights form the basis of democracy in Europe and are prerequisites for the consolidation of the European area of freedom, security and justice;
opozarja, da varstvo temeljnih pravic zajema ukrepe na različnih ravneh (mednarodni, evropski, državni, regionalni in lokalni), ter poudarja vlogo, ki jo lahko odigrajo lokalni in regionalni organi pri praktičnem izvajanju in uveljavljanju teh pravic;
Points out that the protection of fundamental rights involves measures at different levels (international, European, national, regional and local) and emphasises the role which local and regional authorities can play in the practical implementation and promotion of such rights;
obžaluje, da se države članice še vedno izmikajo temu, da bi njihove politike in prakse s področja človekovih pravic nadzirali na ravni EU, ter poskušajo varovanje teh pravic omejiti na povsem nacionalni okvir, kar škoduje aktivni vlogi Evropske unije kot zagovornice človekovih pravic v svetu in jemlje verodostojnost njeni zunanji politiki glede varovanja temeljnih pravic;
Deplores the fact that the Member States continue to refuse EU scrutiny of their own human rights policies and practices and endeavour to keep protection of those rights on a purely national basis, thereby undermining the active role played by the European Union in the world as a defender of human rights and damaging the credibility of the EU's external policy in the area of the protection of fundamental rights;
opozarja, da je v skladu s členom 6(2) Pogodbe EU naloga Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, da zagotovi spoštovanje temeljnih pravic, kot izhajajo iz skupnih ustavnih tradicij držav članic, EKČP in drugih instrumentov mednarodnega prava;
Points out that, pursuant to Article 6(2) of the EU Treaty, the role of the ECJ is to enforce fundamental rights as they result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, the ECHR and other instruments of international law;
poudarja, da člen 7 Pogodbe EU predvideva evropski postopek, s katerim se zagotavlja, da v EU ne bi prihajalo do sistematičnih in hudih kršitev človekovih pravic, vendar ta postopek ni bil nikoli uporabljen, čeprav v državah članicah EU prihaja do kršenja teh pravic, kar dokazujejo sodbe Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice; poziva institucije EU, naj oblikujejo mehanizem za spremljanje in niz objektivnih meril za izvajanje člena 7 Pogodbe EU;
Stresses that Article 7 of the EU Treaty provides for an EU procedure to make sure that systematic and serious violations of human rights and of fundamental freedoms do not take place in the EU, but that such a procedure has never been used notwithstanding the fact that violations do take place in the Member States, as proven by the judgments of the ECtHR; asks the EU institutions to establish a monitoring mechanism and a set of objective criteria for the implementation of Article 7 of the EU Treaty;
poudarja, da se Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pri svoji sodni praksi glede temeljnih pravic sicer lahko zgleduje po skupni ustavni tradiciji držav članic in da je Listina o temeljnih pravicah skupna podlaga za minimalne pravice, vendar države članice iz tega ne morejo sklepati, da bi lahko zmanjšale raven zaščite pravic z izgovorom, da Listina o temeljnih pravicah zagotavlja nižjo raven zaščite kot njihova ustava;
Emphasises that although the constitutional traditions common to the Member States can be drawn on by the ECJ as a source of inspiration in the framing of its judicial doctrine on fundamental rights, the Charter constitutes a common basis of minimum rights, and the Member States cannot use the argument that the Charter would provide a lower level of protection of certain rights than the safeguards offered under their own constitutions as a pretext for watering down those safeguards;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad členom 53 Listine o temeljnih pravicah, v skladu s katerim lahko Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti da pravno podlago temeljnim pravicam in s tem razvije svojo sodno prakso s tega področja, kar je bistvenega pomena za razvoj prava EU;
Welcomes Article 53 of the Charter, which will enable the ECJ to develop its case-law on fundamental rights, thereby giving them a basis in law which is vitally important in the context of the development of EU law;
poudarja, da je vloga sodstva v državah članicah osrednjega pomena pri uveljavljanju človekovih pravic; poziva države članice, naj uvedejo sistem stalnega usposabljanja nacionalnih sodnikov s področja sistemov varstva temeljnih pravic;
Stresses that the judiciary in the Member States have a vital role to play in the enforcement of human rights; urges the Member States to introduce a system of continuous training for national judges on systems for the protection of fundamental rights;
meni, da mora biti praktična uporaba temeljnih pravic cilj vseh evropskih politik; meni, da bi jih morale institucije Evropske unije s tem namenom dejavno uveljavljati in varovati ter jih pri pripravi in sprejemanju zakonodaje v celoti upoštevati;
Takes the view that the practical application of fundamental rights must be an objective of all European policies; takes the view that, to that end, the European Union institutions should actively promote and safeguard fundamental rights and take full account of them when drafting and adopting legislation;
pozdravlja ustanovitev Agencije za temeljne pravice, kar je prvi korak do tega, da se ugodi prošnji Parlamenta po vzpostavitvi celovitega normativnega in institucionalnega okvira, s katerim bo Listina o temeljnih pravicah postala učinkovita in bo zagotovljena skladnost s sistemom, ki ga vzpostavlja EKČP; vseeno opozarja, da je bila v letnih poročilih o človekovih pravicah, ki jih je do leta 2005 pripravila in objavila mreža neodvisnih strokovnjakov s področja temeljnih pravic, ocenjena uporaba vseh pravic, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah, v vseh državah članicah; je zaskrbljen, da zaradi omejenega mandata Agencije za temeljne pravice in razpustitve mreže neodvisnih strokovnjakov cele vrste pomembnih področij politike človekovih pravic v Evropi ne bi več sistematično pregledovali;
Welcomes the setting-up of the Agency, which represents a first step towards meeting Parliament's calls for the establishment of an integrated regulatory and institutional framework designed to put the Charter into effect and guarantee consistency with the system established by the ECHR; points out, however, that the annual reports on human rights drawn up by the European Network of Independent Experts in Fundamental Rights, published until 2005, scrutinised the application of all the rights recognised by the Charter in each Member State, and is concerned, therefore, at the fact that the Agency's limited remit and the dissolution of the Network may exclude from systematic scrutiny a series of important areas of human rights policy in Europe;
glede omejenega mandata Agencije za temeljne pravice poudarja, da vprašanj v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami ni mogoče umetno deliti po področjih prvega, drugega in tretjega stebra, kakor so se države članice odločile pri opredeljevanju pristojnosti Evropske unije, saj temeljne pravice tvorijo neločljivo celoto in so sovisne; meni, da je zaradi tega nujno potrebno, da Komisija in Svet v sodelovanju z Agencijo za temeljne najprej raziščeta posebej zaskrbljujoča vprašanja s področja človekovih pravic v državah članicah in to preko strogo evropskega okvira ter da se pri tem ne omejujeta na aktualne teme Evropske unije ali na posamezne pravne in politične instrumente temveč ugotovita, kateri so ponavljajoči se oziroma trenutni problemi na področju človekovih pravic v državah članicah in upoštevata vse obstoječe mehanizme na mednarodni in evropski ravni;
Emphasises, as regards the Agency's limited remit, that human rights issues cannot be artificially divided into areas under the first, second or third pillars, as the Member States choose to define the scope of the European Union's powers, because fundamental rights are indivisible and interdependent; regards it as essential, therefore, that the Commission and the Council, working with the Agency, should first of all seek to gain an overview of concerns in the area of human rights in the Member States beyond the strict framework of European rules, without confining themselves to topical issues in the European Union or to specific legal and political instruments, but identifying recurring and current human rights problems in the Member States and considering all existing mechanisms at international and European level;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj uporabita informacije, ki jih bodo zaradi spremljanja po Uniji zagotovili Agencija za temeljne pravice, Svet Evrope, nadzorni organi Združenih narodov, nacionalni inštituti za človekove pravice in nevladne organizacije, ter jih pretvorita v popravne ukrepe ali preventivni pravni okvir;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to use the information available as a result of the monitoring carried out within the European Union by the Agency, the Council of Europe, United Nations monitoring bodies, national human rights institutions and NGOs and to translate that information into corrective measures or a preventive legal framework;
si pridržuje pravico, da bo redno spremljal delo Agencije za temeljne pravice v Uniji in obravnaval vprašanja v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami, ki ne spadajo v pristojnost Agencije za temeljne pravice, ter poziva Komisijo, naj v skladu s svojo vlogo varuhinje ustanovnih pogodb ravna enako;
Reserves the right to follow up the Agency's work in the European Union and to address human rights issues which fall outside the Agency's remit, and calls on the Commission to do the same, in keeping with its role as guardian of the Treaties;
opozarja, da dejavne politike pravic ni mogoče omejiti na primere, ki so deležni največje pozornosti javnosti, in da hude kršitve pravic v zaprtih ustanovah za mladoletnike, za ostarele in obolele ter v zaporih niso pod kritičnim nadzorom javnosti; poudarja, da bi morale države članice in Unija zagotoviti strokovni nadzor življenjskih razmer v tovrstnih zaprtih ustanovah, tako glede predpisov kot glede prakse;
Draws attention to the fact that an active rights policy cannot be confined to those cases that receive the greatest public exposure and that serious rights violations are not subject to critical public scrutiny in closed institutions for juveniles, the elderly and the sick or in prisons; stresses that the Member States and the European Union should ensure expert monitoring of living conditions in such closed institutions, in terms of both regulations and practices;
poziva Svet, naj v prihodnje v letna poročila o človekovih pravicah po svetu vključi analizo razmer po svetu in v vseh državah članicah; ocenjuje, da bi takšna dvojna analiza jasno pokazala, da se Unija pri varovanju človekovih pravic enakovredno angažira znotraj in zunaj svojih meja, s tem pa bi se izognili nevarnosti obtožb o uporabi dvojnih meril;
Calls on the Council to incorporate in its future annual reports on human rights in the world an analysis of the situation both in the world and in each Member State; takes the view that a twin-track analysis of this kind would highlight the Union's equal commitment to protecting human rights both inside and outside its borders, so as to ward off any accusations of double standards;
poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo ukrepe, s katerimi bodo nacionalne institucije za človekove pravice, ustanovljene po "Pariških načelih" Združenih narodov, dobile neodvisen status do izvršne oblasti in zadostna finančna sredstva, zlasti ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je ena od funkcij teh organov pregledati politike človekovih pravic, da bi se preprečile kršitve in predlagale izboljšave, saj vemo, da se učinkovitost meri predvsem s preprečevanjem, ne le z reševanjem problemov; poziva države članice, ki tega še niso storile, naj ustanovijo zgoraj omenjene nacionalne institucije za človekove pravice;
Calls on the Member States to take measures to endow the national human rights institutions set up under the United Nations" "Paris Principles" with independent status vis-à-vis the executive and sufficient financial resources, taking account, in particular, of the fact that one of these bodies" tasks is to review human rights policies with the aim of preventing failings and suggesting improvements, on the understanding that effectiveness is measured primarily by the way in which problems are prevented rather than simply resolved; urges those Member States which have not yet done so to set up the above-mentioned national human rights institutions;
vztraja, da bi moral Svet
Urges the Council to transform its
delovno skupino o temeljnih pravicah in državljanstvu preoblikovati v stalno delovno skupino, ki bi delovala vzporedno z Delovno skupino za človekove pravice, Komisijo pa poziva, naj listnico za človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine zaupa enemu samemu komisarju;
working party on fundamental rights and citizenship into a standing working party, which would work in tandem with the Working Party on Human Rights (COHOM), and calls on the Commission to allocate the human rights and fundamental freedoms portfolio to a single Commissioner;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad možnostjo pristopa Unije k EKČP, čeprav to ne bo prineslo bistvenih sprememb, saj "ko se pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti obravnavajo vprašanja v zvezi s pravicami in svoboščinami, zapisanimi v EKČP, Sodišče EKČP smatra kot del pravnega reda Unije" Svet Evrope – Evropska unija: "Ena sama ambicija za evropsko celino", poročilo Jean-Clauda Junckerja, 11. april 2006, str.
Welcomes the prospect of the Union acceding to the ECHR, even if that accession does not bring about fundamental changes, given that "when questions relating to the rights and freedoms enshrined in the ECHR are raised before the Court of Justice of the European Communities, the latter treats the ECHR as forming a genuine part of the EU's legal system" Council of Europe - European Union: "A sole ambition for the European continent", report by Jean-Claude Juncker, 11 April 2006, p.
opozarja na osrednjo vlogo institucij in nadzornih mehanizmov Sveta Evrope s področja človekovih pravic, pa tudi na njegove različne konvencije s tega področja; poziva države članice, institucije Unije in Agencijo za temeljne pravice, naj črpajo iz te izkušnje in te mehanizme upoštevajo, jih vključijo v svoje ukrepe za mrežno sodelovanje in uporabijo standarde, ki jih je razvil Svet Evrope, pa tudi druge otipljive rezultate njegovega dela; poziva, naj se izkoristijo vse možnosti, ki jih odpira Memorandum o soglasju med Svetom Evrope in Evropsko unijo;
Draws attention to the major role played by the Council of Europe's institutions and monitoring mechanisms and its various conventions in the area of human rights; urges the Member States, the EU institutions and the Agency to draw on that experience, to take account of those mechanisms by incorporating them into networking procedures and to use the standards developed by the Council of Europe and the other tangible results of its work; calls for the potential offered by the Memorandum of Understanding between the Council of Europe and the European Union to be exploited to the full;
poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju med različnimi institucijami in organizacijami, ki delujejo na področju varovanja temeljnih pravic na evropski in mednarodni ravni;
Calls for closer cooperation between the various institutions and organisations responsible for protecting fundamental rights, both at European and international levels;