natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da vprašanje trajne opustitve vinogradništva ne more biti osrednje vprašanje reforme skupne ureditve trga za vino, ampak namesto tega eden od parametrov za strukturne posege, financirane iz proračuna skupne ureditve trga za vino preko nacionalnih finančnih okvirov, namenjene oživitvi vinogradniškega potenciala in postopno prilagajanje vinskega sektorja2tržnim zahtevam;
Considers that the issue of permanent abandonment of wine-growing must not be the centrepiece of the reform of the CMO in wine, but that it should instead be one of the parameters of structural interventions financed by the CMO in wine budget through national financial frameworks, aimed at reviving wine-growing potential and gradually adapting the wine sector to market requirements;
meni, da mora pobuda za trajno opustitev priti od proizvajalca, pod pogojem da lahko države članice trajno opustitev na podlagi okoljskih, socialnih, nacionalnih in/ali regionalnih okoljskih in socialnih meril, skladnih s pogoji, ki so bili v naprej določeni na ravni Skupnosti, odobrijo ali zavrnejo; meni, da je treba zagotoviti, da bo lahko vsaka država članica ali regija določila dopustno zgornjo mejo krčenja za vsako regijo in bo imela možnost izbrati kategorije vina, ki bodo imele pri programu krčenja prednost;
Considers that the initiative of permanent abandonment must lie with the producer, provided that Member States are able to approve or reject permanent abandonment using environmental, social, national and/or regional criteria that are compatible with conditions defined beforehand at Community level; considers it essential to make provision for each Member State or each region to set a permissible upper limit for grubbing-up for each region and that they should have the opportunity to select which categories of wine will take priority in the grubbing-up programme;
meni, da objektivna merila Skupnosti, ki so usklajena z bolj splošnim prestrukturiranjem proizvodnega in človeškega potenciala na podeželju in ki lahko olajšajo izbiro trajne opustitve, vključujejo zlasti naslednje primere: (a) vinograde, ki imajo že zelo slab izkoristek in nobene možnosti za obnovo svojega potenciala; (b) primere, ko so vinogradniki vključeni v shemo predčasne upokojitve; (c) vinograde, neprimerne za proizvodnjo kakovostnih vin ali z možnostjo trženja;
Considers that objective Community criteria which are in line with a more general restructuring of the productive and human potential in the countryside and which may facilitate the choice of permanent abandonment include the following indicative cases: (a) vineyards which now have a very low yield and have no prospect of recovering their potential; (b) cases in which wine growers are included in the early retirement scheme; (c) vineyards unsuited to the production of quality wines or which have commercial opportunities;
priporoča, da bi se poleg sistema trajne opustitve uvedlo začasno krčenje, presoja o primernosti njegove izvedbe pa bi bila prepuščena državam članicam; meni, da bi začasno krčenje omogočilo, da se vinogradnikom dodeli finančna pomoč, saj bi bile pravice do nasadov zamrznjene za obdobje nekaj let, po njegovem preteku pa bi lahko vinogradniki površine ponovno zasadili, odstopili od svojih pravic do nasadov ali pa zaprosili za spremembo v dokončno krčenje, če bi to možnost predvidela zadevna država članica;
Recommends that, in addition to the permanent abandonment scheme, temporary grubbing-up could be introduced with each Member State deciding whether to introduce it; considers that temporary grubbing-up would allow the wine grower to receive some financial support, as the planting rights would be consolidated for several years, at the end of which the wine grower could replant, dispose of his planting rights or apply for conversion to permanent grubbing-up if the scheme is opened by the relevant Member State;
vztraja, da je treba po krčenju vinogradov, za kar mora biti izplačan pavšalen prispevek, omogočiti, da se te površine priključijo regijam, upravičenim do enotne nevezane pomoči; meni, da je treba pri določanju premij za krčenje in enotnega plačila upoštevati minimalne okoljske zahteve, da se prepreči zmanjšanje vrednosti podeželskih območij; meni, da morajo imeti vse države članice možnost dodeliti vinogradnikom, vključenim v program krčenja, enkratno pomoč iz programa podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja ali z uporabo mehanizma nihanja in/ali s prerazporeditvijo nacionalnih rezerv za shemo enotnih plačil, da bo pomoč proizvajalcem dosegla stopnjo, ki ustreza nacionalnemu ali regionalnemu povprečju nevezanega neposrednega plačila; ugotavlja, da za krčenje nezakonitih nasadov ne more biti izplačano nobeno nadomestilo;
Maintains that grubbed-up areas for which flat-rate compensation is to be paid must be able to be added to the areas eligible for the award of rights to uniform decoupled aid; believes that, when fixing the grubbing-up premiums and the single payment, the minimum environmental requirements should be considered in order to avoid land degradation; considers that Member States should be able to provide wine growers in the grubbing-up programme with additional support from the resources of the support and development programmes for the wine sector) or by applying the fluctuation mechanism and/or through the redivision of the national reserve of single-payment rights so that producer support can reach the level of the national or regional direct decoupled payment; considers that no compensation can be paid for the grubbing-up of illegal plantations;
Prepoved novih nasadov – postopna liberalizacija novih nasadov
Ban on new plantings – gradual liberalisation of new plantings
meni, da mora slediti natančen in pregleden postopek postopne dodelitve pravic do novih nasadov, da se prepreči negativni vpliv, ki bi ga lahko imelo nenadzorovano povečanje vinogradniških zmogljivosti EU na trg; meni, da morajo države članice predložiti programe, ki bodo obsegali načrtovani obseg nasadov, oceno dogajanja glede dodelitve pravic, različice za vsako regijo in časovni razpored izvajanja; poudarja, da je treba nove pravice do nasadov nameniti predvsem mladim kmetovalcem, proizvajalcem kakovostnega vina in za vinograde, ki so vključeni v programe za izboljšanje kakovosti in trženja vina in ki jih bo treba vnesti v prilagojen register vinogradov; meni, da mora vsaka država članica pred začetkom dodeljevanja novih pravic do nasadov oceniti program in potek krčenja v sodelovanju z regijami ter medstrokovnimi organizacijami in organizacijami proizvajalcev; meni, da je treba pred dodelitvijo pravic do novih nasadov oceniti razmere v zvezi z nasadi, ki niso bili legalizirani, ali so nezakoniti;
Considers that it is appropriate to proceed in a prudent and transparent manner as regards the progressive reattribution of new planting rights, in order to avoid unverifiable development in the EU's wine-growing potential having negative effects on the market: considers that the Member States must submit programmes which indicate the targeted level of plantation, an assessment of the developments in the granting of rights, the varieties concerned in each region and the time-table for application; stresses that the new plantation rights should primarily be given to young farmers, producers of quality wines and undertakings which have been integrated into the programmes for improvement of quality and marketing and which must be integrated into the readjusted wine register; considers that each Member State, in cooperation with the regions, sectoral organisations and producer groups must, with the launching of the grant of new planting rights, assess the grubbing-up programme and the way it has developed; considers that, before granting new planting rights, it will be necessary to evaluate the situation of plantings which have not been legalised or are illegal;
poudarja, da je za področja, kjer se pridelujejo vina z geografsko označbo, potrebno, da odločitve o liberalizaciji trga sprejemajo pristojni regionalni organi, saj morajo zaščititi vrednost naložb vinogradnikov na takšnih področjih, s čimer bi se preprečilo izgubo vrednosti zadevne geografske označbe in zagotovilo stalni nadzor kakovosti izdelkov;
Emphasises that, regarding areas producing wines with geographical indications it may be necessary for decisions regarding liberalisation to be taken by the competent regional authorities, given the need to protect the value of investments by wine growers in such areas, to prevent the geographical indication in question from being devalued and to ensure continued product quality control;
meni, da novih nasadov ni mogoče pojmovati kot ukrepov, upravičenih do financiranja, kot so prestrukturiranje, postopki pridelave, navzkrižna skladnost ter upravljanje trga v kriznih razmerah, ki bodo vključene v programe podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja, lahko pa se pojmujejo med drugim kot skupne dejavnosti organizacij proizvajalcev in/ali sektorskih organizacij, ki si prizadevajo za ukrepe spodbujanja, informiranja potrošnikov, tržnih raziskav in odškodnin v primeru naravnih nesreč, ki so del nacionalnih programov podpore in razvoja vinskega sektorja;
Considers that new plantings may not be considered as actions eligible for funding such as restructuring, cultivation practices, cross-compliance and crisis management, but that they may on the other hand be considered, inter alia, as collective actions of producers organisations and/or the sectoral organisations pursuing policies for promotion, consumer information, market research and compensation for natural disasters which are included in the national support and development programmes for the wine sector;
Register vinogradov – orodje za učinkovit nadzor in upravljanje skupne ureditve trga za vino
Vineyard register – tool for effective control and management of the CMO in the wine sector
priporoča, da bi morale države članice voditi register vinogradov, v katerem bi bile navedene zasajene sorte in število vinskih trt v posamezni enoti (v skladu z Uredbo (EGS) št. 2392/86) Uredba Sveta (EGS) št. 2392/86 z dne 24. julija 1986 o vzpostavitvi registra vinogradov Skupnosti (UL L 208, 31.7.1986, str.
Recommends that Member States keep a register of the vineyards indicating varietals planted and number of vines in each unit (pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86) Council Regulation (EEC) No 2392/86 of 24 July 1986 establishing a Community vineyard register (OJ L 208, 31.7.1986, p.1).
poudarja, da je register vinogradov poglavitno sredstvo, s katerim se nadzoruje spoštovanje omejitev pridelave ;
Emphasises that the vineyard register is the basic tool for controlling compliance with production limits;
se zaveda, da obogatitev neposredno vpliva na količino proizvodnje, saj lahko povzroči zvišanje količine hektarskega pridelka; vendar poudarja, da je vprašanje ohranitve ali ukinitve pomoči za zgoščen grozdni mošt in rektificiran zgoščen mošt neločljivo povezano z vprašanjem ukinitve ali ohranitve postopka obogatitve z dodajanjem saharoze v grozdni mošt, pri čemer je treba upoštevati tudi znižanje cene sladkorja zaradi reforme sladkorja v okviru skupne ureditve trga sladkorja, z različnimi tradicionalnimi enološkimi postopki in obdelavami v državah članicah, možnostjo in tehnično izvedljivostjo zmanjšanja teh enoloških postopkov pod določeno količinsko mejo ter z morebitno uporabo grozdnega mošta v druge namene, kar bi pozitivno vplivalo na zmanjševanje presežka vina;
Is aware that enrichment has a direct impact on production levels, as it may entail an increase in the quantity produced per hectare; stresses, nevertheless, that the issue of maintaining or abolishing aid for concentrated grape must or rectified concentrated must is closely and inseparably linked to the abolition or maintaining of enrichment with sucrose, bearing in mind also the fall in sugar prices resulting from the reform of the CMO in sugar, the various oenological traditions of the Member States, the advisability and technical feasibility of confining the use of such practices to certain precise maximum quantities, as well as possible alternative uses of must that would have a positive impact on reducing wine surpluses;
meni, da lahko države članice odobritev obogatitve vina s slajenjem povežejo s pogoji, kot je nadzorovanje ukrepov za izboljšanje kakovosti (na primer spoštovanje zgornjih meja proizvodnje), in z vremenskimi pogoji;
Considers that approval for enrichment with sugar may be linked by Member States to conditions such as checks on measures to raise quality (e.g. compliance with yield ceilings) and to climatic conditions;
meni, da mora biti postopek obogatitve dovoljen v vseh vinskih regijah, v katerih se uporablja po tradiciji in v katerih ni strukturnih presežkov; meni, da predlog Komisije o zmanjšanju najvišje stopnje obogatitve ni utemeljen in da morajo obveljati obstoječi predpisi;
Believes that enrichment has to be allowed in every wine growing region, where it was traditionally used and where no structural surpluses exist; believes that the Commission's proposal on reducing the maximum level of enrichment is not justified and that the present rules have to remain in force;
meni, da se obogatitve s slajenjem ne sme prepovedati, saj bi bile s tem diskriminirane države članice v regijah Evropske unije, v katerih je vinogradništvo oteženo zaradi manj ugodnih vremenskih razmer;
Takes the view that the use of sugar to enrich wine should not be banned because to do so would be to discriminate against Member States located in parts of the EU where it is more difficult to grow wine owing to a less favourable climate;
poudarja, da je potrebno priskrbeti pomoč za grozdni mošt ali rektificirani zgoščeni mošt, ki se uporablja za bogatitev, saj je treba ohraniti zgodovinsko vinarsko prakso;
Emphasises the need to provide for aid for concentrated grape must or rectified concentrated used for enrichment, since it is necessary to preserve an historical oenological practice;
poudarja, da je potrebno ohraniti pomoč za grozdni mošt, ki se ga uporablja pri proizvodnji grozdnega soka, njen cilj pa je, da se ohrani proizvod, ki ni namenjen proizvodnji vina, kar je pomembno za sektor in pomaga ohranjati tržno ravnovesje;
Stresses the need to maintain aid for must used to produce grape juice, the aim being to maintain a product used for a purpose other than wine production that is important for the sector and helps to maintain market equilibrium;
meni, da mora zgoščen grozdni mošt, ki se ga uporablja pri obogatitvi, izhajati iz istega območja pridelave;
Considers that, in the event of enrichment by the addition of concentrated must, the must should come from the same production area;
poudarja, da je bila študija, ki vzpostavlja povezavo med obogatitvijo s slajenjem in prekomerno proizvodnjo vina v Evropski uniji, izvedena leta 1991 ter ne ustreza sedanjim tržnim pogojem in tako ali tako ni vsebovala pomembnih podatkov;
Points out that the study linking enrichment using sugar with over-production of wine in the EU dates back to 1991, does not reflect current market conditions and in any case did not provide meaningful data;
Javno poseganje na področje alkohola – zasebno skladiščenje vina in mošta
Public intervention concerning alcohol – private storage of wine and must
meni, da je treba preučiti možnost ohranitve zasebnega skladiščenja vina in mošta vsaj v prvi fazi reforme (2008-2011), pri čemer je treba upoštevati tudi predlagane omejitve v zvezi z destilacijo in ukinitev javnega skladiščenja;
Considers that the possibility should be examined of maintaining the private storage of wine and must, at least during the first phase of the reform (2008-2011), taking into account the proposed restrictions on distillation and the abolition of public storage;
Poklicne in sektorske organizacije
Professional and sectoral organisations
poudarja, da lahko sektorske organizacije podajo pobude, če je za to določen pravni okvir Skupnosti, na primer na naslednjih področjih: bolj polni izkoristek proizvodne zmogljivosti, obveščanje potrošnikov o zmernem pitju vina, opravljanje potrebnih anket za usmeritev proizvodnje na proizvode, ki so bolj prilagojeni potrebam notranjega trga in izvoz, nujne gospodarske naložbe, iskanje novih metod za zmanjšanje porabe fitofarmacevtskih sestavin, preusmeritev na ekološko kmetijstvo itd.;
Stresses that sectoral organisations may take initiatives, provided that a Community authorisation framework is established, which could cover, for example: the fuller exploitation of the production potential, consumer information concerning moderate wine consumption, the conduct of the research necessary to channel production to products which are better geared to domestic and export market requirements, indispensable commercial investments, the search for new means of restricting the use of plant protection substances, the switch towards organic farming etc.;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svojem predlogu izrazi pripravljenost za reformo vinskega sektorja, zlasti z izvajanjem učinkovite in konkretne politike Skupnosti na področju promocije evropskega vina, za kar je treba zagotoviti zadostna finančna sredstva;
Calls on the Commission, in its proposal, to demonstrate a determination to reform the wine-making sector, in particular by means of an effective and concrete Community policy to promote European wine, by making provision for appropriate financial commitments;
meni, da je treba ustanoviti posebni sklad za promocijo evropskih vin prek poklicnih in sektorskih organizacij ter organizacij za varstvo potrošnikov kakor tudi javnih agencij za regionalni razvoj;
Considers it appropriate to set up a specific fund for the promotion of European wines via professional, sectoral and consumer protection organisations and public agencies for regional development;
meni, da bi morala Komisija oblikovati splošne smernice za promocijo evropskih vin, ki bodo temeljile na zmernem in odgovornem pitju vina in za katere je treba zagotoviti potrebna proračunska sredstva;
Believes that the Commission should lay down some activity guidelines for the promotion of European wines, based on moderate and responsible wine consumption and accompanied by the requisite funding;
meni, da si mora Evropska unija prizadevati za stabilizacijo tržnega deleža, prepoznavanje in zaščito vin s posebnim geografskim izvorom na svetovni ravni; poudarja, da bodo ta vina tudi bolj prepoznavna, če bo poenostavljeno označevanje;
Takes the view that the EU must seek to achieve the consolidation of market share, recognition and protection of wines with a specific geographical origin at a worldwide level; points out that these wines will be more easily recognised if labelling is simplified;
meni, da za ohranitev oziroma po možnosti povečanje povpraševanja po kakovostnem vinu ne zadostuje le tradicionalen način proizvodnje in posebno označevanje, temveč je poleg tega potrebna tudi ustrezna promocija vina na svetovnem trgu; ocenjuje, da je treba v ta namen nujno izvesti ustrezno financirane posebne ukrepe, da bo kakovost evropskega vina bolj prepoznavna na svetovnem trgu;
Considers that to produce a quality wine by traditional methods and to label it specifically, without at the same time promoting it properly on the world market, is insufficient to ensure that demand is maintained or possibly increased; considers it essential to this end to devise specific, properly financed measures aimed at enhancing the ability to communicate the quality of European wine to the world market;
meni, da je treba ob upoštevanju nedavne spremembe določb o označevanju v uredbah (ES) št. 1991/2004 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1991/2004 z dne 19. novembra 2004 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 753/2002 o določitvi podrobnih izvedbenih pravil za Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1493/1999 glede označevanja, poimenovanja, predstavitve in zaščite določenih vinskih proizvodov (UL L 344, 20.11.2004, str.
Considers, in view of the recent redefinition of the provisions concerning labelling in Regulations (EC) No 1991/2004 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1991/2004 of 19 November 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description, designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products (OJ L 344, 20.11.2004, p.
in (ES) št. 1427/2004 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1427/2004 z dne 9. avgusta 2004 o spremembi Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1622/2000 o določitvi nekaterih podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe (ES) št. 1493/1999 o skupni ureditvi trga za vino in vzpostavitvi kodeksa Skupnosti na področju enoloških postopkov in obdelav (UL L 263, 10.8.2004, str.
and (EC) No 1427/2004 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1427/2004 of 9 August 2004 amending Regulation (EC) No 1622/2000 laying down certain detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 on the common organisation of the market in wine and establishing a Community code of oenological practices and processes (OJ L 263, 10.8.2004, p.
pred dokončnim sprejemom sprememb oceniti učinek dosedanjih sprememb;
, that an assessment should be made of the effects of the changes introduced before any further change is made;
poudarja, da morajo biti na označbah, ki so priložene uvoženim vinom in zadevajo podobo vina, navedeni v Evropski uniji prepovedani enološki postopki;
Stresses that oenological practices which are not allowed in the EU must clearly be labelled on imported beverages which refer to the image of wine;
meni, da je označevanje vin iz EU nujno, vendar ne sme biti bolj zapleteno kot označevanje vin iz tretjih držav ;
Believes the labelling of EU wines to be essential; considers, however, that it should not be more complicated that the labelling of wines from third countries;
priporoča, naj se v predpisih posameznih držav članic na označbah uskladi jezik označevanja, da gospodarskim subjektom ne bo treba prevesti v druge jezike informacij, za katere se v namembni državi uporablja zelo podoben izraz in zato ni nevarnosti, da bi bili potrošniki zmedeni;
Calls for harmonisation of the Member States" rules concerning the language to be used on labels, in order to ensure that operators are not obliged to translate certain information from one language into another in cases where the term used in the target country is very similar and hence there is no risk of creating confusion amongst consumers;
Dejavna in ambiciozna zunanja politika EU na področju trženja vin kot steber skupne ureditve trga za vino
A proactive and ambitious EU external trade policy for wines as a pillar of the CMO in wine
poudarja, da težave, s katerimi se sooča vinski sektor in ki izhajajo v glavnem iz vse večjega uvoza iz tretjih držav in vse večjih količin vinskih zalog, ki presegajo enoletno proizvodnjo in za katere ni videti, da se bodo porabile, pomenijo pritisk na zmanjšanje cen in dohodkov proizvajalcev; obravnavati jih je treba tako, da se vzpostavi seznam temeljnih prednostnih nalog, ki niso bile upoštevane v prej omenjenem poročilu Komisije, vključno na primer s spodbujanjem zmerne in odgovorne porabe, prerazporeditvijo proračunskih virov, da bi dosegli nove porabnike in pridobili nove trge ali celo pridobili nazaj prejšnje, s spodbujanjem kakovosti in povečanjem raziskav;
Points out that the difficulties facing the wine sector arising mainly from increasing wine imports from third countries and increasing numbers of wine stocks which exceed one year's production and have little prospect of being disposed of, exert a downward pressure on prices and producers" incomes and need to be tackled by the establishment of a set of basic priorities not taken into account in the abovementioned Commission communication, including, for example, encouraging moderate and responsible consumption, reallocating budgetary resources with a view to reaching new consumers and winning new markets or even recapturing markets, promoting quality and boosting research;