natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je seznanjen s pozitivnim poročilom Sodišča o letnih računih evropskih šol; kljub temu ugotavlja, da v skladu z mnenjem Sodišča sistem notranjega nadzora šol ne spoštuje načela ločevanja nalog med odredbodajalcem in računovodjem ter da se naloge odredbodajalca izvajajo v delegacijah dveh vodij oddelka za vse postavke in brez finančnih omejitev; upa, da bo nova Finančna uredba za evropske šole, ki je začela veljati dne 1. januarja 2007, popravila pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče; upa, da bo v prihodnosti Komisija prevzela večjo odgovornost za trajnostno politiko na področju šolstva in sicer v meri, ki ustreza njenemu deležu financiranja evropskih šol, ne pa njenemu uradnemu številu glasov v najvišjih odločitvenih organih, ter da si bo prizadevala za dolgoročno politiko, ki bo za sodelujoče zanesljiva in bo omogočala gotovost pri načrtovanju; želi, da bi se srednjeročno uskladilo uradno število glasov z deležem financiranja;
Notes the Court's favourable report concerning the European Schools' annual accounts; observes, however, that it is pointed out in that report that the Schools' internal control system does not follow the principle of the separation of functions between authorising officers and accounting officers and that authorising tasks are performed by delegation by two heads of unit in respect of all budget headings and with no financial ceiling; hopes that the new Financial Regulation for the European Schools (which has been in force since 1 January 2007) will remedy the weaknesses to which the Court has drawn attention; hopes that, in future, the Commission will shoulder its responsibility for a sustainable schools policy to a greater extent, commensurate with its share of funding of the European Schools and not with its formal voting rights on the highest decision-taking bodies, and work towards a long-term and, for stakeholders, reliable policy guaranteeing planning certainty; calls, in the medium term, for voting rights to be brought into line with funding share;
Vprašanja v zvezi s stavbami Skupnosti
Questions in connection with the Community's buildings
je seznanjen s pripombami generalnega direktorja Urada za infrastrukturo in logistiko v Bruslju (OIB), ki v svojem letnem poročilu o delu opozarja na strukturni deficit, ki ga povzročajo stroški vzdrževanja palače Berlaymont po njeni obnovi Točka 2.2.1.2. letnega poročila o delu Urada za infrastrukturo in logistiko "Upravljanje tveganj", stran 23.
Notes the complaint lodged by the Director-General of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels (OIB) in his Annual Activity Report on the structural deficit generated by the cost of maintaining the Berlaymont building following its refurbishment Paragraph 2.2.1.2. of the OIB's Annual Activity Report, 'Risk management', page 23.
, ter druge težave z računovodstvom in upravljanjem; ocenjuje, da je treba ugotovljene težave s strukturnim deficitom nemudoma rešiti ter Komisijo poziva, da sprejme nujne ukrepe, in o tem obvešča Parlament;
, and also his references to a series of accounting and management problems; considers that the structural-deficit problems highlighted should be resolved as a matter of urgency and calls upon the Commission to take appropriate action and to notify Parliament thereof;
se bo prav tako vrnil na druga vprašanja v zvezi s stavbo Berlaymont, takoj ko bo predloženo napovedano posebno poročilo Računskega sodišča o stavbni politiki;
Will also return to other questions in connection with the Berlaymont building as soon as the Court of Auditors" special report on buildings policy, notice of which has been given, is available;
se je seznanil s poročili Komisije z dne 21. februarja 2007 o kartelu v zvezi z dvigali in tekočimi stopnicami, katerega članom so bile izrečene denarne kazni v višini 990 000 000 EUR; pričakuje, da bo Komisija do septembra 2007 predložila poročilo, iz katerega bo razvidno, v kolikšni meri so bile tudi institucije Skupnosti žrtev kartela pri različnih gradbenih projektih, in kateri ukrepi so bili sprejeti za uveljavitev odškodninskih zahtevkov;
Notes the Commission reports of 21 February 2007 about a lifts and escalators cartel, the members of which have been fined more than EUR 990 000 000; expects a report from the Commission by September 2007 which shows the extent to which Community institutions, too, have fallen victim to that cartel, in connection with their various building projects, and what steps have been taken to assert claims for damages;
poudarja, da bo nova finančna perspektiva 2007–2013 pomembno vplivala na projekte TEN-T, saj je dogovorjeni znesek za približno 40 % nižji od prvotnega predloga Komisije; zato meni, da bo posledično izbiranje in razvrščanje projektov po njihovi pomembnosti postalo še bolj pomembno;
Points to the fact that the new 2007-2013 financial perspective will have a considerable impact on the TEN-T, as the amount agreed upon is approximately 40% lower than the original Commission proposal; is of the opinion that as a consequence selecting and prioritising projects will become even more important;
ocenjuje, da bi bilo v sedanjem finančnem okviru treba dajati prednost čezmejnim področjem prednostnih projektov, da bi sodelovalo več držav članic;
Is of the opinion that in the current financial environment preference should be given to cross-border sections of priority projects involving more than one Member State;
poziva države članice, da namesto zagovarjanja načela pravičnega deleža podprejo pristop, ki poudarja evropsko dodano vrednost;
Calls on the Member States to support a European added-value approach rather than fighting for the "fair share" principle;
v tem smislu je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi počasnega izvajanja prednostnih projektov TEN-T ter Komisijo in države članice poziva, naj nemudoma izboljšajo usklajevanje financiranja prometne infrastrukture EU v okviru letnih in večletnih programov;
Is, in this context, deeply concerned about the slow execution of TEN-T priority projects and urges the Commission and Member States to improve co-ordination of EU transport infrastructure funding in annual and multiannual programmes;
poziva Komisijo, da si še naprej prizadeva za vzpostavitev pravnih okvirov in jasnih postopkov za zagotovitev strogega nadzora in poglobljene ocene projektov in programov ter da oblikuje podroben seznam natančnih meril za pregledno prednostno razvrščanje projektov;
Calls on the Commission to continue its effort to establish clear legal frameworks and procedures, and also to guarantee rigorous monitoring and thorough evaluation of projects and programmes and to set up a comprehensive list of clear criteria which allow projects to be prioritised in a transparent manner;
poziva Komisijo, da pri vzpostavljanju regulativnega okvira za vsebino poročil evropskih koordinatorjev pojasni postopek imenovanja slednjih;
Asks the Commission to clarify the procedure for the appointment of European coordinators when setting up the regulatory framework for the content of their reports;
poziva Komisijo, da vzpostavi jasno in transparentno delitev institucionalnih pristojnosti ter opredeli okvir za usklajevanje dejavnosti med generalnim direktoratom za regionalno politiko in generalnim direktoratom za energetiko in promet, da bi se izognili dvojnemu financiranju istih projektov;
Urges the Commission to establish a clear and transparent division of institutional responsibilities and define a framework for the coordination of activities between DG REGIO and DG TREN with a view to avoiding double-financing of the same projects;
ugotavlja, da je Sodišče prvo analizo stroškov in koristi v zvezi z ustanovitvijo izvajalske agencije ocenilo kot neustrezno; poziva Sodišče, da drugo analizo, dokončano julija 2005, oceni pravočasno za poročilo na lastno pobudo pristojnega parlamentarnega odbora;
Notes that the Court has dismissed the first cost-benefit analysis for the creation of an Executive Agency as superficial; asks the Court to evaluate the second one, which was finalised in July 2005, in time for the competent committee's own initiative report;
, v svojem členu 3(1) predvideva analizo stroškov in koristi ob upoštevanju številnih dejavnikov, ki jo je treba opraviti, preden se lahko zahteva vzpostavitev izvajalske agencije; obžaluje, da Komisija Računskemu sodišču na začetku ni mogla predstaviti zadovoljive analize stroškov in koristi vzpostavitve izvajalske agencije; dvomi, ravno tako kot Evropsko računsko sodišče, o kakovosti revidirane različice analize stroškov in koristi v zvezi z eksternalizacijo upravljanja finančne pomoči Skupnosti za omrežja TEN-T; poziva Komisijo, da skuša v prihodnje od Računskega sodišča pridobiti pozitivno mnenje o analizah stroškov in koristi, preden zahtevo za vzpostavitev izvajalske agencije posreduje proračunskim organom;
requires, in its Article 3(1), a cost-benefit analysis, taking into account a number of factors, before the establishment of an executive agency can be requested; regrets that the Commission was not in a position to present the European Court of Auditors with a satisfactory cost-benefit analysis of the establishment of an executive agency at the outset; remains, together with the European Court of Auditors, doubtful with regard to the quality of the revised version of the cost-benefit analysis concerning the externalisation of the management of Community financial support to the TEN-T networks; for the future, calls on the Commission to seek a positive opinion on cost-benefit analyses from the European Court of Auditors before forwarding a request for the establishment of an executive agency to the budgetary authorities;
ocenjuje, da bi morala Komisija načrtovati predlog povečanja financiranja Skupnosti za vse čezmejne projekte v proračunski postavki TEN-T; s tem v zvezi pozdravlja sporazum o sodelovanju z Evropsko investicijsko banko;
Is of the opinion that the Commission should consider proposing that the Community's contribution to the TEN-T budget line be increased for cross-border projects; welcomes in this context the cooperation agreement with the European Investment Bank;
Posebno poročilo št. 1/2006 o prispevku Evropskega socialnega sklada k preprečevanju zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja
Special Report No 1/2006 on the contribution of the ESF in combating early school leaving
pripisuje velik pomen učinkoviti in odgovorni rabi proračuna EU ter uporabi načela, da se z javnim denarjem ne bi smelo financirati pobud, ki niso v zadostni meri preverljive, ter zato obžaluje, da med zmanjšanjem stopnje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja in financiranjem s strani EU ni bila odkrita jasna povezava;
Attaches great importance to an efficient and responsible use of the EU budget and to the application of the principle that an initiative that is insufficiently verifiable should not be financed by public money and therefore regrets that no clear correlation between reduction of early school leaving and EU funding has been found;
priznava, da ima Komisija primeren mehanizem spremljanja in nadzorovanja za zagotavljanje upoštevanja načel dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, vendar poudarja, da ga je treba izboljšati v skladu z izjavami same Komisije; s tem v zvezi poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga, kako se namerava s tem spoprijeti;
Recognises that the Commission has an appropriate monitoring and control mechanism to ensure compliance with the principles of sound financial management but stresses that this mechanism must be improved in accordance with what the Commission itself has stated; in this respect, calls upon the Commission to propose how it plans to go about this;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj sodeluje z državami članicami in njihovimi nacionalnimi statističnimi uradi, da se ustrezno opredeli in prepozna pojav zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja ter spodbudi izmenjava podatkov in najboljših praks med vsemi lokalnimi in nacionalnimi organizacijami, ki so odgovorne za preprečevanje zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja;
Encourages the Commission to work with the Member States and their national statistics offices to properly define and identify the incidence of early school leaving and encourage the exchange of information and best practice between all local and national organisations responsible for tackling early school leaving;
poziva k iskanju skupnega razumevanja standardov merjenja in opredelitev, ki so povezane s težavami zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, v državah članicah EU-27, s čimer se zagotovita primerljivost in ustrezna kakovost nacionalnih podatkov, ki sta potrebni za ugotavljanje dejanskega uresničevanja prednostnih nalog iz lizbonske strategije na tem področju;
Calls for a common understanding between the 27 Member States as to measuring standards and definitions related to the problem of early school leavers in order to ensure that national data is comparable and as to the necessary quality required to establish whether the Lisbon Strategy priorities in this respect are in fact being met;
poziva Komisijo, da v novih državah članicah pripravi temeljito oceno, in sicer čim prej ter dovolj zgodaj, da so po potrebi mogoči ukrepi za odpravljanje napak; nadalje poziva Računsko sodišče, naj tudi v novih državah članicah opravi podobno revizijo o posledicah zgodnje opustitve izobraževanja, kot jo je opravil v državah članicah EU-15;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure that a thorough assessment is carried out in the new Member States as early as possible and in time to make remedial action possible, if required; calls, furthermore, upon the Court of Auditors to conduct in parallel, in the new Member States themselves, a similar audit to the one it conducted in the past in the 15 Member States on the impact of early school leaving funding;
poudarja, da kljub pozitivnim rezultatom na mnogih področjih skupni učinek programa TACIS v smislu njegove učinkovitosti in trajnosti ni izpolnil vseh pričakovanj; ugotavlja, da gre pri večini nepravilnosti, ki jih je ugotovilo Sodišče, za slabo upravljanje s strani Komisije pri načrtovanju programa;
Stresses that, despite the positive results in many areas, the overall impact of the TACIS programme has not always been efficient and sustainable, as was intended; notes that the nature of the irregularities identified by the Court was mainly mismanagement in the programming process on the part of the Commission;
poziva Komisijo k nadaljevanju dialoga z rusko vlado, da bi opredelili nacionalne potrebe in trenutno usmeritev ter si prizadevali za ugotovitev in opredelitev prednostnih nalog in ciljev, ki naj bi jih dosegli s sprejetimi ukrepi; meni, da bi Komisija morala zasledovati načelo učinkovite porabe sredstev ter jo zato poziva, da bolj pazljivo in dosledno kot doslej spremlja in ocenjuje program;
Calls on the Commission to engage the Russian Government in further dialogue to identify national needs and direction accurately and to seek to define and identify priorities and objectives to reach by actions taken; considers that the Commission should keep in mind the principle of "value for money" and therefore urges the Commission to monitor and evaluate the programme more prudently and closely than before;
spodbuja Komisijo, da osredotoči izbiro prednostnih nalog na omejeno število področij in programov ter da projektni pristop spremeni v programskega, saj je prejšnji pogosto omejeval dialog, lastništvo in prožnost, prav tako pa je bil naklonjen samostojnim projektom, ki niso prispevali k doseganju širših in dolgoročnih ciljev, določenih v veljavnem sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju;
Urges the Commission to pursue its policy of focusing on a limited number of sectors and a limited number of programmes; takes the view that the Commission should change its scope from a project approach to a programme approach, since the project approach has too often led to limited dialogue, ownership and flexibility as well as to stand-alone projects unlikely to produce the broader and longer term objectives set out in the current partnership and cooperation agreement;
poziva Komisijo, da sprejme koristne ukrepe za pripravo predlogov za pravno podlago, ki omogoča uporabo sredstev programa TACIS za skupno sofinanciranje z Rusko federacijo, ter da upošteva izjemen pomen možnosti za finančno vključevanje regionalnih in lokalnih akterjev, socialnih partnerjev in tesnejšega sodelovanja zasebnega sektorja;
Calls on the Commission to take action in preparing a proposal for a legal basis enabling the use of TACIS funds for co-financing with the Russian Federation and considers the financial involvement of regional and local players and the social partners and a greater participation by the private sector to be essential;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi pogosto ocenjevanje projektov ne glede na čas njihovega zaključka, s čimer bo izboljšala povratne informacije o preteklih izkušnjah in prav tako zagotovila jasne informacije o projektih v teku in različnih programih za lažji dostop javnosti do informacij ter povečala odprtost in preglednost uporabe sredstev in procesa sprejemanja odločitev;
Calls on the Commission to ensure frequent project-based evaluation, beyond the time of project completion, in order to improve feed-back from past experience and also to ensure clear information on on-going projects and the various programmes designed to facilitate public access to information, and to increase openness and transparency about the utilisation of funds and decision-making;
pozdravlja splošno pozitivno oceno Računskega sodišča o odzivu humanitarne pomoči GD ECHO na cunami;
Welcomes the Court of Auditors' overall positive evaluation of DG ECHO's humanitarian aid response;
poziva Komisijo, da pojasni vlogi GD za humanitarno pomoč in GD za okolje (prek mehanizma civilne zaščite) pri zadovoljevanju humanitarnih potrebah, da bi zagotovili usklajeno ukrepanje;
Urges the Commission to clarify the role of DG ECHO, and DG Environment (via the Civil Protection Mechanism) in response to humanitarian needs, with a view to ensuring coherent action;
poziva Komisijo, da okrepi vlogo GD ECHO in s tem omogoči dodatno izboljšanje usklajevanja in odzivnih zmogljivosti, ki omogočajo zadovoljevanje potreb žrtev humanitarnih nesreč v prihodnosti, ter nameni ustrezno pozornost vidiku povezovanja kratkoročne humanitarne pomoči z dolgoročno obnovo in sanacijo; ugotavlja, da sta trenutno obe stopnji razdeljeni med različne generalne direktorate, postopke in pooblastila;
Invites the Commission to strengthen the role of DG ECHO to continue to improve its coordination and its response capacity to meet rapidly and efficiently the needs of victims of future humanitarian catastrophes and to give adequate consideration to the importance of linking short-term humanitarian aid with longer term rehabilitation and reconstruction; notes that at present the two phases belong to different DGs, procedures and mandates;
vztraja na načelu dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in meni, da je zagotavljanje podrobnih finančnih informacij nujno za učinkovitejše spremljanje izvajanja projektov;
Insists on sound financial management and considers that provision of detailed financial information is necessary to facilitate the effective monitoring of project implementation;
opozarja na priporočilo Računskega sodišča, v skladu s katerim bi moral GD ECHO okrepiti svoj sistem spremljanja;
Emphasizes the recommendation of the Court that DG ECHO should strengthen its monitoring system;
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da se v izjemnih razmerah ni mogoče izogniti zvišanju stroškov za blago in delo; vseeno poziva Komisijo, da preuči ukrepe za čim boljši nadzor in spremljanje stroškov;
Understands that an increase in prices of goods and labour costs might be unavoidable in exceptional situations; invites however the Commission to give consideration to measures aimed at controlling and monitoring costs as much as possible;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad tekmovalnostjo donatorjev humanitarne pomoči za oglaševanje njihovih blagovnih znamk in povečanje prepoznavnosti pri humanitarnih nesrečah, ki so medijsko zelo odmevne, saj to negativno vpliva na usklajevanje humanitarne pomoči in na predstavo, ki jo imajo o tovrstni pomoči žrtve teh nesreč;
Voices its concern with regard to brand promotion and competition for visibility amongst humanitarian donors in humanitarian catastrophes which attract high media attention, as this practice has a negative impact on the coordination of humanitarian aid and the perception of the aid by the victims of such catastrophes;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, da jasno opredeli pojem NVO;
Asks the Commission to define clearly what an NGO is;
obžaluje prakso Komisije, ki za nekatere projekte, financirane iz programa Phare, ni vnaprej dokazala, da so potrebni, in je s tem kršila načela zakonitosti in pravilnosti;
Deplores the practice of the Commission whereby the need for certain projects financed under the Phare programme was not proven in advance and thus the principles of legality and regularity were not respected;
poziva Komisijo, da bolgarske in romunske oblasti pritegne k sodelovanju, da se natančneje določijo potrebe in zmogljivosti omenjenih držav ter prednostne naloge in cilji, ki jih je treba uresničiti;
Urges the Commission to involve the Bulgarian and Romanian authorities in mutual cooperation with a view to identifying the two countries" requirements and capabilities more precisely, and to endeavour to define and determine the priorities and the objectives to be achieved;
ugotavlja, da so kljub nekaterim ukrepom, ki so bili sprejeti za rešitev problema v zvezi z nezadostno upravljavsko sposobnostjo in napakam pri pogodbenem pravu ter za zagotovitev izpolnitve zahtev v zvezi s sofinanciranjem, še vedno potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja;
Notes that although certain steps have been taken in order to solve the problem of insufficient administrative capability and deficiencies in the rule of contractual law, and to ensure that co-financing requirements are complied with, efforts still need to be made;
poziva Komisijo, da nameni posebno pozornost vzpostavljanju upravnih struktur in informacijskih sistemov v Romuniji in Bolgariji, ki bodo omogočali dobro gospodarjenje z evropskimi sredstvi ter kontrolo, in da nadzira reorganizacijo upravnih organov, odgovornih za investiranje sredstev;
Calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to establishing in Romania and Bulgaria administrative structures and information systems capable of managing and controlling EU funds and to supervise the reorganisation of the departments responsible for investing those funds;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi jasne podatke o potekajočih projektih in programih ter o splošni usposobljenosti romunske in bolgarske uprave za samostojno upravljanje in upravni nadzor ter da poveča odprtost in preglednost porabe sredstev in sprejemanja odločitev v zvezi z njo;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that clear information is provided concerning current projects and the various programmes, and on the Romanian and Bulgarian administrations" overall management and independent monitoring capability, and to ensure that there is greater openness and transparency in the use of funding and in the taking of decisions relating thereto;
poziva Komisijo, da pridobi neodvisno mnenje o tem, ali so romunske in bolgarske oblasti sposobne pravilno in gospodarno upravljati z sredstvi Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission for an independent opinion concerning the ability of the Romanian and Bulgarian administrations to carry out the sound financial management of Community funding;
poziva Komisijo na podlagi nove razvojne politike, ki je bila podpisana decembra 2005, naj za svoje razvojno sodelovanje vpelje celovito okoljsko strategijo;
Urges the Commission, on the basis of the new development policy signed in December 2005, to establish a comprehensive environment strategy for its development cooperation;
meni, da bi morala taka strategija poleg priznavanja pomena vključevanja okolja v vse razvojne programe in projekte, okolje tudi upoštevati kot prednostno področje izdatkov;
Considers that such a strategy should recognise the importance not only of mainstreaming the environment into all development programmes and projects but also making the environment a priority field for expenditure;