natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
nujno poziva EU, naj na naslednjem zasedanju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice proaktivno prispeva k resoluciji v zvezi s poročilom o nadaljnjem spremljanju misije za ugotavljanje dejstev o konfliktu v Gazi s strani odbora neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ter jo podpre, s katero bi zagotovili odgovornost za kršitve mednarodnega prava in podprli napotitev na generalno skupščino in mednarodne pravne mehanizme, če Izrael in Palestina ne bi spoštovala svojih obveznosti glede izvajanja preiskav v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi; nadalje poziva visoko predstavnico, naj dejavno spremlja skladnost z ugotovitvami iz nadaljnjega spremljanja poročila mednarodne misije za ugotavljanje dejstev v zvezi z incidentom s humanitarnim konvojem ter tako zagotovi spoštovanje načel odgovornosti in obveznosti; ob tem poudarja, da je treba v pridružitvenem svetu EU–Izrael in skupnem odboru EU in Palestinske uprave najprej pretresti vprašanja človekovih pravic; je zlasti zaskrbljen, ker sklepi pridružitvenega sveta EU–Izrael z dne 21. februarja 2011 ne odražajo stališča EU o tej problematiki;
Urges the EU to pro-actively contribute and support, at the upcoming UNHRC session, a resolution relating to the report on follow-up of the committee of independent experts to the international fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict, in order to ensure accountability for the violations of international law and support a referral to the GA and to International Justice mechanisms in the event of Israel and Palestinian parties failing to comply with their obligation to carry out investigations according to international standards; further calls on the High Representative to actively monitor compliance with the findings of the ‘Follow-up to the report of the international fact-finding mission on the incident of the humanitarian flotilla’, ensuring principles of accountability and liability are upheld; underlines in this respect that human rights aspects have to be first discussed within the EU-Israel Association Council and the EU-PA Joint Committee; is particularly concerned by the fact that the conclusions of the EU-Israel Association Council of 21 February 2011 do not reflect the EU position on this matter;
pozdravlja izjavo visoke komisarke OZN za človekove pravice med njenim prvim obiskom na zasedenem palestinskem ozemlju in v Izraelu, zlasti pa njeno odločno sporočilo, ki ga je posredovala ob kritiki izraelske politike o gradnji naselij, namreč da mednarodno pravo o človekovih pravicah in mednarodno humanitarno pravo ne moreta biti predmet pogajanj; poudarja pomen mirne demokratizacije Bližnjega vzhoda;
Welcomes the statements by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights on her first visit to the occupied Palestinian territory and Israel and, in particular, the strong message that she conveyed with her criticism of Israeli settlement policy, and that ‘international human rights law and international humanitarian law are not negotiable’; underlines the importance of a peaceful democratisation of the Middle East;
obžaluje, da ima sedanja praksa prostovoljnega jamstva zelo raznolike in neustrezne rezultate, medtem ko merila za članstvo v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice, ki jih je generalna skupščina določila z resolucijo št. 60/251, zahtevajo polno sodelovanje s tem organom; zato znova poudarja, da bi bilo treba za vse članice poleg dolgoročne in trdne zavezanosti človekovim pravicam kot minimalni prag za članstvo določiti stalno veljavno vabilo za posebne postopke; poudarja pomen dejansko konkurenčnega okolja v volilnem procesu; poziva k opustitvi možnosti, da bi regionalne skupine predstavljale vnaprej določene sklope kandidatk za članstvo v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice;
Regrets that while membership criteria for the UNHRC as established by General Assembly Resolution 60/251 implies full cooperation with the body, the current practice of voluntary pledges has had very disparate and inadequate results; reiterates therefore that all members should have effective standing invitations to Special Procedures as a minimum threshold for membership, in addition to a solid record of commitment to human rights; stresses the importance of a truly competitive environment in the election process; calls for the abolition of the possibility for regional groups to present a predetermined slate of candidates for UNHRC membership;
poziva države članice EU in Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj se dejavno posvetijo pregledu Sveta OZN za človekove pravice leta 2011, da bi okrepili spoštovanje njegovega mandata; poudarja, da bi moral biti Svet OZN za človekove pravice mehanizem zgodnjega opozarjanja in preprečevanja, za kar bi morali uporabljati posebne postopke; znova poudarja potrebo po preglednem in celovitem revizijskem postopku, ki bi upošteval stališča nevladnih organizacij, civilne družbe in vseh drugih zainteresiranih strani; poziva Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje, naj pododbor Evropskega parlamenta za človekove pravice obvešča o poteku pregleda;
Calls on the EU Member States and the EEAS to actively engage in the 2011 review of the UNHRC to strengthen compliance with its mandate; stresses that the UNHRC should be more of an early warning and preventive mechanism and that the expertise of Special Procedures should be used for this purpose; reiterates that there is a need for a transparent and all-inclusive review process, taking into account the views of NGOs, civil society and all other relevant stakeholders; calls on the EEAS to keep the Subcommittee on Human Rights of the European Parliament informed on the state of play of the review;
ponovno izraža svoje stališče, da bi bilo treba s pregledom ohraniti neodvisnost Urada visoke komisarke za človekove pravice, ter nasprotuje vsem poskusom spremembe statusa tega urada, saj bi to lahko negativno vplivalo na financiranje in posledično tudi na njegovo neodvisnost; pozdravlja nedavno imenovanje pomočnika generalnega sekretarja OZN za človekove pravice, ki vodi pisarno Urada visoke komisarke za človekove pravice v New Yorku; meni, da bo nova pisarna prispevala k okrepitvi stikov, dialoga in preglednosti med Generalno skupščino OZN in drugimi organi OZN, vključno z Varnostnim svetom in Uradom visoke komisarke za človekove pravice; poudarja potrebo po zagotovitvi zadostnih finančnih sredstev, da bodo lahko regionalne in področne pisarne Urada visoke komisarke za človekove pravice nadaljevale svoje delo na terenu;
Reiterates its position that the review should preserve the independence of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and opposes any attempts to change the status of the OHCHR which could impact negatively on the funding and consequently on its independence; welcomes the recent appointment of a UN Assistant Secretary General on Human Rights who leads the OHCHR office in New York; considers that this new office will help strengthen contact, dialogue and transparency between the UN General Assembly and the other UN entities, including the Security Council and the OHCHR; underlines the need to ensure sufficient funding to keep regional and field OHCHR offices open, so that they may be able to continue their work on the ground;
vztraja, da je treba ohraniti in okrepiti posebne postopke ter Svetu OZN za človekove pravice zajamčiti možnost, da posamezne kršitve človekovih pravic rešuje z resolucijami in mandati za posamezne države; poudarja pomen nedeljivosti človekovih pravic ne glede na to, ali gre za socialne, ekonomske, kulturne, državljanske ali politične; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je mehanizem za pritožbe (edinstven splošen mehanizem za pomoč žrtvam) dal pičle rezultate glede na veliko število vlog, naslovljenih nanj; poudarja, da je treba to vprašanje obravnavati v okviru pregleda Sveta OZN za človekove pravice;
Insists on the safeguarding and strengthening of the Special Procedures and on the guaranteeing of the possibility for the UNHRC to address specific human rights violations through country resolutions and country mandates; stresses the importance of the indivisibility of human rights, whether social, economic, cultural, civil or political; notes with concern that the Complaints Mechanism, a unique universal victim-oriented mechanism, has produced little in the way of outcome in relation to the large number of submissions it has received; underlines the need to address this issue in the UNHRC review;
priznava, da ima splošni redni pregled dodano vrednost, saj v njem sodelujejo vse vlade, obenem pa so vse članice OZN deležne enake obravnave in nadzora, čeprav morajo države na to prostovoljno pristati in se obvezati, da bodo ukrepale v skladu s priporočili; opozarja, da bodo v okviru tega mehanizma do decembra 2011 pregledane vse države članice Združenih narodov;
Recognises the added value of the UPR as a shared experience for all governments, which submits all UN members to equal treatment and scrutiny despite the fact that the countries have to voluntarily accept to be submitted and to follow up the recommendations; points out that by December 2011 all United Nations Member States will have been reviewed under this mechanism;
vztraja, da je v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice nujno treba ohraniti prostor za civilno družbo, da bi povečali sodelovanje civilne družbe v tem dialogu in nevladnim organizacijam omogočili nove priložnosti, da vzpostavijo dialog s posameznimi državami;
Insists that it is essential to maintain a space for civil society in the UNHRC in order to enhance civil society participation in the dialogue, opening up new opportunities for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) to enter into dialogue within particular States;
podpira večje sodelovanje nevladnih organizacij v splošnem rednem pregledu s tem, da se lahko njihova pisna priporočila predložijo v obravnavo delovni skupini in da sodelujejo pri odločitvah te skupine;
Supports further involvement of NGOs in the UPR by allowing the submission of written recommendations for consideration by the Working Group and participation in its deliberations;
je seznanjen s tem, da splošni redni pregled državam omogoča, da se zavežejo k izvajanju svojih obveznosti glede človekovih pravic in spremljanju sklepov organov za spremljanje pogodb in posebnih postopkov;
Takes note of the possibility the UPR offers for States to commit to implementing their human rights obligations, and following up on the conclusions of treaty bodies and Special Procedures;
ponovno potrjuje, da bi se priporočila morala bolj usmeriti na rezultate, neodvisne strokovnjake in nacionalne ustanove za človekove pravice pa poziva, naj dejavneje sodelujejo pri splošnem rednem pregledu, da bi zagotovili, da je slednji resnično učinkovit mehanizem za nadaljnje ukrepanje; meni, da bi strokovnjaki, ki bi opazovali proces pregleda ter bi pri sprejemanju končnega poročila predstavili povzetek in analizo, v tem procesu prispevali neodvisno strokovno znanje;
Reaffirms the fact that recommendations should be more results-oriented and calls for more involvement by independent experts and national human rights institutions in the UPR to ensure it is an effective follow-up mechanism; considers that independent expertise can be brought into the UPR process by having experts observe the review process and present a summary and analysis of the UPR during the adoption of the final report;
obžaluje, da prvi krog pregleda v nekaterih državah ni izpolnil pričakovanj, da bo to pregleden, neselektiven in nekonflikten proces; v zvezi s tem priznava vlogo držav članic EU pri prizadevanjih, da bi se presegel blokovski način razmišljanja; spodbuja države članice EU, naj zagotovijo tehnično pomoč za lažje uresničevanje priporočil;
Regrets that the first cycle of the review of certain countries has not lived up to the expectations of a transparent, non-selective and non-confrontational process; acknowledges in this regard the role EU Member States have played in trying to break through the ‘bloc mentality’; encourages EU Member States to provide technical assistance to help the recommendations to be implemented;
poziva države članice EU, naj še naprej sodelujejo v pregledu Sveta OZN za človekove pravice, naj poskrbijo za to, da med prvim in drugim krogom splošnega rednega pregleda ne bo vrzeli, ter naj zagotovijo, da se bo drugi krog osredotočil na izvajanje in nadaljnje spremljanje priporočil; se strinja s stališčem, da bi morale države, kjer se izvaja splošni redni pregled, odločno ukrepati v skladu z vsakim priporočilom in časovnim razporedom za uresničevanje priporočil delovne skupine; ugotavlja, da bi lahko predložitev vmesnega poročila o stopnji uresničevanja pripomogla k temu procesu;
Calls on EU Member States to continue to engage in the review of the UNHRC, to ensure there is no gap between the first and second cycles of the UPR, and to ensure the second cycle focuses on the implementation and follow-up of recommendations; supports the view that States submitted to the UPR should provide clear responses to each recommendation and timetables for implementation of the Working Group's recommendations; notes that the submission of a mid-term report on the status of implementation may contribute to this process;
ponovno izjavlja, da so posebni postopki osrednji del instrumentov OZN za človekove pravice ter da verodostojnost in učinkovitost Sveta za človekove pravice glede zaščite človekovih pravic temelji na sodelovanju s posebnimi postopki in njihovem popolnem izpolnjevanju; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je bistvena krepitev neodvisnosti in interakcije posebnih postopkov s Svetom;
Restates that Special Procedures lie at the core of the UN human rights machinery, and that the credibility and effectiveness of the UNHRC in the protection of human rights rests on cooperation with Special Procedures and their full implementation; stresses, in this context, that strengthening the independence and interactivity of the Special Procedures with the Council is fundamental;
obsoja poskuse, da bi omajali neodvisnost posebnih postopkov, s tem ko bi vlade postavili v vloge nadzornika; poudarja, da bi kakršen koli nadzor politiziral sistem ter škodil njegovi učinkovitosti;
Condemns attempts to undermine the independence of Special Procedures by putting governments in an oversight position over the Special Procedures; stresses that any sort of control would politicise and damage the effectiveness of the system;
ponovno poudarja, da so posebni postopki o razmerah v posameznih državah bistven instrument za izboljšanje položaja človekovih pravic na terenu; poudarja, da splošni redni pregledi ne morejo nadomestiti mandatov za posamezne države zaradi ključnih elementov, na katerih slonijo, kot sta periodičnost in strokovnost;
Reiterates that the Special Procedures on country situations are an essential instrument for improving human rights on the ground; stresses that due to crucial elements like their periodicity and the expertise they are based on, country mandates cannot be replaced by the UPR;
poziva države članice EU, naj pri pregledu stopijo v bran celovitosti in odgovornosti Sveta OZN za človekove pravice ter naj poleg sprejetja izbirnih meril in preglednejšega procesa imenovanj na podlagi poklicne preteklosti, znanja, kvalifikacij in izkušenj kandidatov podprejo tudi oblikovanje mehanizma nadaljnjega spremljanja v zvezi z izvajanjem priporočil iz posebnih postopkov; pozdravlja predlog nevladnih organizacij, da bi bilo treba okrepiti zmožnost posebnih postopkov za zgodnje opozarjanje, in sicer z mehanizmom, ki bi jim omogočal začeti postopek samodejne preučitve v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice;
Calls on EU Member States to defend the integrity and accountability of the UNHRC in the review by supporting the establishment of a follow up-mechanism on the implementation of recommendations of Special Procedures, in addition to the adoption of selection criteria and a more transparent appointments process based on the background, skills, qualifications and experience of nominees; endorses the proposal by NGOs to strengthen the early warning capacity of Special Procedures through a mechanism that allows them to trigger the automatic consideration of a situation by the UNHRC;
pozdravlja udeležbo EU na 16. zasedanju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice, ki jo bo zastopala visoka predstavnica/podpredsednica Komisije;
Welcomes the participation of the EU HR/VP in the UNHRC 16th session;
vztraja, da morajo Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje, predvsem delegacije EU v Ženevi in New Yorku, povečati doslednost, prepoznavnost in verodostojnost ukrepanja EU v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice z nadaljnjim razvojem medregijskega dometa in sodelovanja, zlasti pa z lobiranjem v zmernih državah v vseh skupinah;
Insists on the EEAS, and notably the EU delegations in Geneva and New York, increasing the coherence, visibility and credibility of the EU's action in the UNHRC by further developing cross-regional outreach and cooperation and especially on lobbying the moderate states in all groups;
podpira medregionalno izjavo o pravicah lezbijk, homoseksualcev, biseksualcev in transseksualcev, ki bo predstavljena;
Supports the cross-regional statement that will be presented on the LGBTI rights;
ponovno izraža podporo dejavni udeležbi EU v delu Sveta OZN za človekove pravice že vse od njegove ustanovitve, in sicer s pobudami ali podporo za resolucije, uradnimi izjavami ter udeležbo v interaktivnih razgovorih in razpravah; priznava zaveze EU glede obravnavanja razmer v različnih državah v okviru Sveta OZN za človekove pravice in poudarja, da je treba te zaveze odločno uresničevati;
Reiterates its support for the EU's active participation in the work of the UNHRC since its establishment, namely through sponsoring or co-sponsoring resolutions, issuing statements, and intervening in interactive dialogues and debates; recognises the commitments made by the EU to addressing country situations in the UNHRC and stresses the importance that these commitments be strongly implemented;
podpira skupno pobudo EU in skupine latinskoameriških in karibskih držav (GRULAC) za resolucijo o otrocih, ki živijo in delajo na ulici;
Supports the joint initiative of EU and GRULAC (Latin American and Caribbean Group) for a resolution on children living and working on the street;
poziva države članice EU, naj si z vsemi močmi prizadevajo ohraniti vse mandate za posebne postopke, zlasti pa poziva k obnovitvi mandata posebne poročevalke OZN za položaj zagovornikov človekovih pravic;
Calls on EU Member States to do their utmost to preserve all special procedures mandates and calls in particular for the renewal of the mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders;
obžaluje, da je pogost stranski učinek prizadevanj EU za soglasje zmanjševanje njenih ambicij, in meni, da bi se morala odločneje zavzemati za resolucije o posameznih državah in jih odločneje vlagati;
Regrets that as a side-effect of its efforts to seek consensus, the EU often appears to be lowering its ambitions, and believes the EU should be much bolder in putting forward and/or running with country resolutions;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da EU ni zmožna učinkovito uveljaviti svojega vpliva v širšem sistemu OZN; poudarja, da mora biti Svet OZN za človekove pravice prednostna naloga EU, ki mora bolje usklajevati države članice, in poziva Svet, naj sprejme smernice, s katerimi bo olajšal usklajevanje in odločanje v tem kontekstu, in naj se v prizadevanju, da bi presegli blokovsko razmišljanje v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice, povezuje v koalicije oziroma naveze z najpomembnejšimi regionalnimi partnerji in zmernimi državami;
Notes with concern that the EU has been unable to exercise influence effectively within the wider UN system; stresses the need for the EU to make the HRC a priority and to coordinate better among the Member States, and calls on the Council to adopt guidelines in order to facilitate coordination and decision-making in this context, and to seek to build coalitions/allegiances with key regional partners and all moderate states in an effort to overcome the logic of blocs within the HRC;
na praktični ravni opozarja, da je pomembno imeti v Ženevi in New Yorku večjo, dobro financirano delegacijo EU; poudarja, da mora biti dogajanje v Ženevi in New Yorku sestavni del zunanje politike EU, pri kateri naj bo v ospredju izboljšanje notranje usklajenosti, ob tem pa tudi poudarja, da morata biti dvo- in večstranska raven dobro usklajeni;
Draws attention, on a practical level, to the importance of having a larger, well-resourced EU Delegation in Geneva and New York; stresses that what happens in Geneva and New York must be an integral part of EU foreign policy, with a focus on improving internal coordination, and stresses, too, the need for good interplay between the bilateral and multilateral levels;
obžaluje, da je bila preložena resolucija, ki jo je EU septembra 2010 predložila generalni skupščini OZN, da bi okrepila svoj položaj, tako da bi bil skladen z novo institucionalno ureditvijo po Lizbonski pogodbi; opozarja, da bi okrepljeni status EU omogočil, da bi jo zastopal stalen predstavnik (predsednik Evropskega sveta in/ali visoki predstavnik) ter da bi nastopala enotno, kar bi povečalo prepoznavnost in vpliv EU kot globalnega akterja; vztraja, da si mora posebna delovna skupina pri Evropski službi za zunanje delovanje v tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami EU še naprej prizadevati za sprejetje te resolucije;
Deplores the fact that the resolution tabled by the EU for the UN General Assembly in September 2010 with the aim of reinforcing its ‘status’ in order to be consistent with the new institutional arrangements arising from the Lisbon Treaty has been postponed; points out that this enhanced status would give the EU the possibility of being represented by a constant figure (the President of the European Council and/or the High Representative) and of speaking with one voice, and would raise the visibility and influence of the EU as a global actor; insists on the need to continue efforts made by the EEAS ‘special task force’ to promote the adoption of the resolution in close cooperation with the EU Member States;
pooblašča svojo delegacijo na 16. zasedanju Sveta OZN za človekove pravice, naj posreduje pomisleke iz te resolucije; delegacijo poziva, naj o svojem obisku poroča pododboru za človekove pravice, in meni, da mora Evropski parlament nujno še naprej pošiljati svoje delegacije na zasedanja Sveta OZN za človekove pravice;
Mandates its delegation to the 16th Session of the UNHRC to voice the concerns expressed in this resolution; calls on the delegation to report to the Subcommittee on Human Rights regarding its visit, and considers it indispensable to continue sending a European Parliament delegation to relevant sessions of the UNHRC;
ponovno poziva države članice EU, naj zagotovijo spoštovanje človekovih pravic v svoji notranji politiki, da se bodo izognile dvojnim merilom, pa tudi zaradi tekočega procesa pristopanja EU k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, saj bi bil v nasprotnem primeru položaj EU v Svetu OZN za človekove pravice bistveno omajan;
Reiterates its call on the EU Member States to ensure that human rights are respected in their own internal policies in order to avoid double standards and in view of the current accession process of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as failure to do so fundamentally could weaken the EU's position in the UNHRC;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje visoki predstavnici/podpredsednici Komisije, Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Varnostnemu svetu OZN, generalnemu sekretarju OZN, predsedujočemu 64. generalni skupščini, predsedniku Sveta Združenih narodov za človekove pravice, visoki komisarki OZN za človekove pravice ter delovni skupini EU–OZN, ki jo je ustanovil odbor za zunanje zadeve.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Security Council, the UN Secretary-General, the President of the 64th General Assembly, the President of the UN Human Rights Council, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the EU–UN Working Group established by the Committee on Foreign Affairs.