natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
odobrava stališča, izražena v zeleni knjigi o teritorialni koheziji o konkurenčnosti, ki je „odvisna tudi od povezovanja z drugimi ozemlji, da se zagotovi usklajena in trajnostna uporaba skupnih sredstev“ ter omogoči sprostitev potenciala, ki ga ima ozemeljska raznolikost Evropske unije; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da so, nemoteno in usklajeno delovanje prevoznih storitev, ustrezen dostop do telekomunikacij in morebitno združevanje energije, zdravstva, raziskovanja, izobraževanja, varstva okolja in infrastrukture, temeljni pogoji za nadaljnje spodbujanje konkurenčnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi konkretne predloge za opredelitev in ustrezno izvajanje cilja glede teritorialne kohezije;
Endorses the views expressed in the Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion concerning competitiveness, which ‘depends on building links with other territories to ensure that common assets are used in a coordinated and sustainable way’ in order to release the potential inherent in the EU's territorial diversity; stresses, in that connection, that the smooth and coordinated operation of transport services, sufficient access to telecommunications and the pooling, where appropriate, of energy, healthcare, research, education, environmental protection and infrastructure are basic conditions for further boosting competitiveness; calls on the Commission to bring forward concrete proposals for the definition and consistent implementation of the objective of territorial cohesion;
meni, da morajo države članice podpirati lokalni pristop k oblikovanju in izvajanju kohezijske politike; priznava, da se vloga regij med državami članicami razlikuje glede na njihovo politično in upravno strukturo; zahteva, naj se načelo subsidiarnosti v svoji okrepljeni in razširjeni obliki, kot jo opredeljuje PDEU, ustrezno izvaja in naj se med tekočim programskim obdobjem iščejo izboljšave tako, da se spodbuja načelo decentralizacije do ravni lokalnih organov, kar bi omogočilo boljšo porabo sredstev; meni, da je v tem okviru neučinkovito, da regije upravljajo v povprečju samo s 30,5 % skupnega proračuna za kohezijsko politiko, z ostankom pa upravljajo centralne uprave; zato meni, da je treba načelo partnerstva v prihodnje močno okrepiti;
Takes the view that the Member States must support a place-based approach to framing and implementing cohesion policy; acknowledges that the role of the regions varies between Member States depending on their political and administrative structure; requests that the principle of subsidiarity, in its strengthened and widened concept as defined in the TFEU, should be duly applied and that improvement should be sought, over the current programming period, by promoting the principle of decentralisation down to local-authority level, with a view to improving the absorption of funds; considers it to be counterproductive, in this context, that regions administer on average only 30.5% of the overall budget allocated to cohesion policy, with the remainder being administered by central governments; considers, therefore, that in future the partnership principle must be significantly strengthened;
poudarja, da načelo upravljanja na več ravneh prenaša odgovornost za programe, kar omogoča boljši izkoristek zmogljivosti za ozemeljsko sodelovanje, in da bi zato Evropska unija z usklajenimi in k rezultatom usmerjenimi ukrepi ter z določanjem regionalnih in lokalnih prednostnih nalog lahko sledila skupnim ciljem;
Stresses that multi-level governance entails the devolution of responsibility for programmes, allowing for better exploitation of the potential of territorial cooperation, and that, therefore, in order for the Union to be able to pursue common objectives, using coherent and result-oriented measures while establishing specific regional and local priorities, the principles of multi-level governance should be implemented;
pozdravlja dosežke pobud URBAN in LEADER ter poudarja, da je treba uporabiti predhodne izkušnje in zbrati primere najboljše prakse pri oblikovanju okvira za integriran in uravnotežen razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, ki bo prilagojen potrebam vsake regije; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči in predlaga metodologije dela, ki bodo spodbujale podeželsko-mestna partnerstva, si prizadevale za zajezitev upadanja števila prebivalcev na podeželju in spodbujale trajnostni razvoj mest, saj 80 % evropskega prebivalstva živi v mestnih območjih; poudarja, da imajo mestna in podeželska območja dinamično vlogo na področju regionalnega gospodarskega razvoja ter poudarja, da je treba v prihodnjem programskem obdobju več vlagati v mestne in predmestne projekte ter jih bolje uskladiti s projekti razvoja podeželja;
Welcomes the results of the URBAN and LEADER initiatives and highlights the need to use this past experience and the associated examples of best practice in providing the framework for integrated, balanced rural-urban development, in accordance with the necessities of each region; calls on the Commission to examine and propose working methodologies that promote urban-rural partnerships, combat the depopulation of rural areas and, at the same time, stimulate sustainable urban development, since nearly 80% of the EU population lives in urban areas; points out that both urban and rural areas play a dynamic role in regional economic development and stresses the need, with a view to the next programming period, for investment in urban as well as sub-urban projects and for better coordination with rural development programmes;
Večanje vpliva kohezijske politike za povečanje gospodarske konkurenčnosti
Maximizing the impact of cohesion policy to increase economic competitiveness
meni, da je partnerstvo bistveno načelo pri določitvi vsebine kohezijske politike, pri čemer usmerjenost od spodaj navzgor krepi upravne zmogljivosti in kakovost postopka načrtovanja; meni, da morajo vse ravni upravljanja pri krepitvi gospodarske konkurenčnosti EU stremeti k povezovanju, dopolnjevanju in produktivnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj jasneje opredeli načelo partnerstva, da bi zagotovili oblikovanje resničnih partnerstev z regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi ter spodbudili izmenjavo dobre prakse med regijami;
Views partnership as a key principle in the determination of cohesion-policy content, with the ‘bottom-up’ approach enhancing administrative capacities and the quality of the programming process; believes that all levels of government need to play a cohesive, complementary and productive role in boosting the economic competitiveness of the EU; calls on the Commission to give a clearer definition of the partnership principle in order to ensure that real partnerships with regional and local authorities are set up and to facilitate exchanges of best practice between regions;
pozdravlja predlog spremembe Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 o poenostavitvi postopkov uporabe strukturnih skladov in kohezijskega sklada ter poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej poenostavlja te postopke, da se zagotovi njihova prožnost in zmanjša upravno breme za upravičence do sredstev, da bodo organi pravočasno in s primernimi sredstvi kos večjim izzivom; meni, da lahko javno-zasebna partnerstva nudijo resnično podporo pri dopolnjevanju prizadevanj na lokalni in regionalni ravni, ter poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi konkretne predloge za utrditev javno-zasebnih partnerstev znotraj kohezijske politike;
Welcomes the amendment to Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 simplifying the procedures for utilisation of the structural funds and the Cohesion Fund and invites the Commission to continue simplifying such procedures to ensure their flexibility and reduce the administrative burden on funding beneficiaries, so that the authorities can address major challenges in a timely manner and with the appropriate resources; takes the view that public-private partnerships can provide genuine support by supplementing the efforts made at local and regional level, and calls on the Commission to bring forward concrete proposals for the consolidation of public-private partnerships within the framework of cohesion policy;
poudarja, da je treba zavoljo odprave razlik tudi v prihodnje zagotavljati podporo predvsem projektom, namenjenim regijam, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, da se bo ohranil pričakovani učinek v tem programskem obdobju in bo v skladu s prvotnimi ocenami; izboljšanje dostopnosti in infrastrukture bo prispevalo h konkurenčnosti regij, ki zaostajajo v razvoju, na notranjem trgu, s tem pa tudi k zunanji konkurenčnosti EU kot celote; meni, da bi se z ukinitvijo te podpore zmanjšal učinek pozitivnih začetnih rezultatov;
Stresses the importance, in the interests of eliminating disparities, of continuing to provide support primarily for projects aimed at regions that are lagging behind, so that the impact expected in this programming period can be maintained and will be in line with initial estimates; notes that improving accessibility and infrastructural facilities will help to make those regions which lag behind in the internal market more competitive, and will thus contribute to the external competitiveness of the EU as a whole; takes the view that withdrawing this support would reduce the impact of the positive initial results;
poudarja, da je kljub dejstvu, da se kohezijska politika osredotoča na najmanj uspešne regije, zadeva vse evropske regije, ne glede na njihovo razvitost; zato poudarja, da je treba spodbujati cilj regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja; ponovno poudarja, da je močna in finančno dovolj podprta kohezijska politika, katere proračun bi moral biti tako v absolutnem kot v relativnem smislu najmanj enak sedanjemu, predpogoj za izpolnjevanje ciljev strategije EU 2020, da bi se zagotovilo varno, inteligentno, trajnostno in vključujoče gospodarstvo, s katerim bi bilo gospodarstvo EU konkurenčno na svetovni ravni, ter za zagotovitev, da se vse regije enakomerno razvijajo in dosežejo cilj socialne, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije;
Stresses that, although cohesion policy traditionally focuses on the least prosperous regions, it concerns all European regions, regardless of their level of development; emphasises, therefore, the need to encourage the objective of regional competitiveness and employment; reiterates that a strong and well financed cohesion policy, with a budget at least equivalent to the current one in both absolute and relative terms, is a precondition for delivering the objectives of the EU 2020 strategy, in order both to secure an intelligent, sustainable and integrative economy, making the EU globally competitive, and to ensure that all regions develop harmoniously, achieving the objective of social, economic and territorial cohesion;
meni, da mora BDP ostati glavno merilo za določanje, ali je pomoč iz kohezijske politike potrebna regiji, lahko pa se dodajo drugi merljivi kazalniki, če se izkažejo za pomembne, kar bi nacionalnim organom omogočilo, da na ustrezni ravni odločanja zaprosijo za upoštevanje drugih kazalnikov, s katerimi se lahko upoštevajo posebne značilnosti regij in mest;
Takes the view that GDP must remain the principal criterion for determining the eligibility of regions for cohesion-policy assistance, while other measurable indicators might be added if proven to be relevant, leaving room for national authorities to apply, at the appropriate level of decision making, other indicators which take into account the specific attributes of regions and cities;
poudarja, da je pomembno, da se pri dodeljevanju sredstev upoštevajo posebne lastnosti recimo obalnih, gorskih in oddaljenih regij, regij, v katerih upada število prebivalcev, ter oddaljenih obmejnih regij in mest; spodbuja regije, naj predstavijo pobude za izkoriščanje svojih regionalnih posebnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj prilagodi različne finančne instrumente za ustvarjanje kratko- in dolgoročne dodane vrednosti, pri tem pa upošteva tudi učinke gospodarske in finančne krize;
Stresses the importance of taking into account, in the allocation of funds, the specific characteristics of, for example, coastal, mountainous outermost regions, regions suffering from depopulation, or remote border regions and towns; encourages the regions to put forward initiatives for exploiting their regional specificity; calls on the Commission to adapt the various financial instruments so as to create added value in the short and medium term, while also taking into consideration the effects of the economic and financial crisis;
Kohezijska politika kot najpomembnejša politika za obdobje po letu 2013
Cohesion policy as a key policy for the post-2013 period
poudarja, da imata regionalni razvoj in teritorialna kohezija zaradi svoje evropske dodane vrednosti po vsej Evropi odločilen pomen za povečanje gospodarske konkurenčnosti Unije in uresničevanje ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, pri čemer je lokalni pristop eden od poglavitnih načinov za doseganje gospodarskega ravnotežja;
Emphasises the decisive role which regional development and territorial cohesion throughout Europe play, by virtue of their European added value, in enhancing the economic competitiveness of the EU and meeting the EU 2020 targets, with the place-based approach being one of the main ways of achieving economic balance;
poudarja, da je potreben celosten pristop k uporabi sredstev iz strukturnih skladov, saj gre za pomemben instrument za pomoč regijam pri doseganju trajnostne rasti, zaposlovanja in blaginje;
Stresses the need for an integrated approach to the application of the structural funds as an important means of helping regions to achieve sustainable growth, employment and prosperity;
opozarja Komisijo in države članice, da pričakovanja evropske javnosti temeljijo na potrebah prebivalcev, zlasti na želji po dostopu do primerne infrastrukture in kakovostnih javnih storitev, ki jih je treba zagotavljati pravično in po cenah, ki si jih lahko privoščijo vsi evropski državljani, ne glede na to, kje živijo in delajo; vztraja, da je treba spoštovati pravico do enakih možnosti, in poudarja, da je treba invalidom zagotoviti dostop do vse infrastrukture in projektov, ki se financirajo iz strukturnih skladov;
Reminds the Commission and the Member States that the expectations of the European public are based on people's needs, and especially on the desire for access to adequate infrastructure and quality public services, which must be provided equitably and at prices affordable by all European citizens regardless of where they live and work; insists that the right to equal opportunities must be respected and stresses the need for disabled access to all infrastructure and projects financed under the structural funds;
poudarja, da je ekonomska, socialna in teritorialna kohezija priložnost, da se v celoti izkoristijo možnosti za raziskave, razvoj in inovacije ter zagotovi, da bo imela evropska javnost boljši življenjski standard in večje zaupanje v EU; selektivne in kombinirane naložbe v raziskave, razvoj in inovacije morajo upoštevati regionalne in mestne zmožnosti in zmogljivosti ter s programi institucionalnega razvoja in izgradnje zmogljivosti pomagati pri razvoju ključnih področij, kot so e-zdravje, farmacevtski izdelki, prevoz in logistika, okolje, digitalne vsebine, energija in varnost;
Highlights the fact that economic, social and territorial cohesion provides an opportunity to harness the full potential of research, development and innovation and to ensure that the European public have better living standards and greater confidence in the EU; selective and combined investment in research, development and innovation must take into account regional and urban capacities and potential and help to develop key areas such as e-health, pharmaceuticals, transport and logistics, environment, digital content, energy and security, by means of institutional development and capacity-building programmes;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. decembra 2010 o predlogu sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti ( KOM(2010)0760 – C7-0398/2010 – 2010/2293(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 15 December 2010 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument ( COM(2010)0760 – C7-0398/2010 – 2010/2293(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0760 – C7-0398/2010 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0760 – C7-0398/2010 ),
ter zlasti točke 27 Sporazuma,
(IIA of 17 May 2006), and in particular point 27 thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje prve obravnave predloga splošnega proračuna za leto 2011 dne 20. oktobra 2010 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0372 .
having regard to its first reading of 20 October 2010 on the 2011 draft general budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0372 .
ob upoštevanju izida spravnega sestanka 15. novembra 2010,
having regard to the results of the conciliation of 15 November 2010,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0367/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0367/2010 ),
ker zgornje meje večletnega finančnega okvira, zlasti v podrazdelku 1a in razdelku 4, ne dopuščajo financiranja prednostnih nalog EU, ne da bi bili pri tem ogroženi obstoječi instrumente in politike,
whereas the ceilings of the Multiannual Financial Framework, especially for subheading 1a and heading 4, do not allow the financing of EU priorities without jeopardising the existing instruments and policies,
ker sta se veji proračunskega organa na spravnem sestanku dogovorili o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti za dodatno financiranje opredeljenih prednostnih nalog v teh dveh razdelkih, pod pogojem, da bo mogoče doseči splošni dogovor o vseh preostalih spornih vprašanjih,
whereas the two arms of the budgetary authority agreed in conciliation, provided that an overall agreement could be reached on all outstanding issues, to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to offset the reinforcements for identified priorities under these two headings,
ugotavlja, da kljub finančnim okrepitvam za obveznosti v nekaterih proračunskih postavkah zgornji meji podrazdelka 1a in razdelka 4 ne dopuščata ustreznega financiranja izbranih prednostnih nalog, ki sta jih potrdila Parlament in Svet;
Notes that, despite contained reinforcements in commitments on a limited number of budget items, the ceilings of subheading 1a and heading 4 do not allow for an adequate financing of selected priorities carried by Parliament and the Council;
zato pozdravlja dogovor, dosežen na spravnem sestanku, o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti za financiranje programa vseživljenjskega učenja in programa za konkurenčnost in rast v podrazdelku 1a ter finančne pomoči za Palestino, mirovni proces in UNRWA v razdelku 4 v skupnem znesku 105 milijonov EUR;
Welcomes, therefore, the agreement reached during conciliation concerning the use of the Flexibility Instrument for the financing of the Lifelong Learning Programme and Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a, and the financing of financial assistance to Palestine, the peace process and UNRWA under heading 4 for a total amount of EUR 105 million;
opozarja, da so ti programi ključnega pomena za prihodnost Unije, saj dajejo jasne spodbude za gospodarsko dejavnost in za vlogo Unije kot svetovnega akterja;
Recalls that these programmes are crucial for the future of the Union as they provide a clear impetus for economic activity, and for the Union's role as a global player;
znova poudarja, da je uporaba tega instrumenta, kot je predvidena v točki 27 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006, znova pokazala, da bi moral biti proračun EU veliko bolj prilagodljiv;
Reiterates that the mobilisation of this instrument, as foreseen in point 27 of the IIA of 17 May 2006, highlights, once more, the crucial need for the EU budget to be increasingly flexible;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj podpiše ta sklep skupaj s predsedujočim Svetu ter poskrbi za njegovo objavo v
Instructs its President to sign the decision with the President of the Council and to arrange for its publication in the
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da sta se veji proračunskega organa, potem ko sta proučili vse možnosti za prerazporeditev proračunskih sredstev v podrazdelku 1a in razdelku 4, na spravnem sestanku 11. novembra 2010 sporazumeli o uporabi instrumenta prilagodljivosti, da se dopolni financiranje v proračunu za leto 2011, in sicer s prekoračitvijo zgornjih meja v podrazdelku 1a in razdelku 4, za:
Whereas, after having examined all possibilities for re-allocating appropriations under subheading 1a and heading 4, at the conciliation meeting on 11 November 2010, the two arms of the budgetary authority agreed to mobilise the Flexibility Instrument to complement the financing in the 2011 budget, beyond the ceilings of subheading 1a and heading 4, of:
18 milijonov EUR za program vseživljenjskega učenja v podrazdelku 1a;
EUR 18 million for the Lifelong Learning programme under subheading 1a;
16 milijonov EUR za program konkurenčnosti in inovacij v podrazdelku 1a;
EUR 16 million for the Competitiveness and Innovation Programme under subheading 1a;
71 milijonov EUR za Palestino v razdelku 4 –
EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4,
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 se uporabi instrument prilagodljivosti za zagotovitev 34 milijonov EUR v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti v podrazdelku 1a in 71 milijonov EUR v sredstvih za prevzem obveznosti v razdelku 4.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the Flexibility Instrument shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 34 million in commitment appropriations in subheading 1a and of EUR 71 million in commitment appropriations in heading 4.
71 milijonov EUR za Palestino v razdelku 4.
EUR 71 million for Palestine under heading 4.
Ta sklep se objavi v
This decision shall be published in the
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. decembra 2010 o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, vsi oddelki, kot ga je spremenil Svet (17635/2010 – C7-0411/2010 – 2010/2290(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 15 December 2010 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, all sections, as modified by the Council (17635/2010 – C7-0411/2010 – 2010/2290(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju člena 314 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU) in člena 106a Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za jedrsko energijo,
having regard to Article 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and to Article 106a of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. marca 2010 o prednostnih nalogah proračuna za leto 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0086 .
having regard to its resolution of 25 March 2010 on priorities for the 2011 budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0086 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. junija 2010 o pooblastilu za tristranska pogajanja o predlogu proračuna za leto 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0205 .
having regard to its resolution of 15 June 2010 on the mandate for the trilogue on the 2011 draft budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0205 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o stališču Sveta o predlogu splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011 – vsi oddelki Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0372 .
having regard to its resolution of 20 October 2010 on Council's position on draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011 – all sections Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0372 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o pogajanjih o proračunu za leto 2011 Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0433 .
having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the ongoing negotiations on the 2011 budget Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0433 .
ob upoštevanju novega predloga splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2011, ki ga je Komisija predložila 26. novembra 2010 ( KOM(2010)0750 ) v skladu s členom 314(8) PDEU,
having regard to the new draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011 which the Commission presented on 26 November 2010 ( COM(2010)0750 ) in accordance with Article 314(8) TFEU,
ob upoštevanju sklepov s tristranskih pogovorov o proračunu, ki so potekali 6. decembra 2010,
having regard to the conclusions of the budgetary trilogue on 6 December 2010,