natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da so stroškovno najučinkovitejši mehanizmi nadzora tisti, pri katerih imajo zainteresirane strani neposreden interes za zagotavljanje trajnostnega ribolova;
Notes, in this regard, that the most cost-effective mechanisms of control are those where stake-holders have a direct interest in preserving the sustainability of fisheries;
v okviru zmanjšanja napora poziva države članice, naj se odločijo, ali se to zmanjšanje doseže:
Invites the Member States, in the framework of effort reduction, to decide whether such reduction will be accomplished through:
s skrajšanjem ribolovnega časa brez zmanjšanja zmogljivosti,
a reduction of fishing time, without a reduction of capacity,
z zmanjšanjem zmogljivosti brez skrajšanja ribolovnega časa ali
a reduction of capacity, without a reduction of fishing time, or
s kombinacijo obeh možnosti,
a combination of the two,
poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za spremembo zadevne zakonodaje, da bi se med drugim obravnavalo vprašanje presežnih zmogljivosti, in da predlaga ukrepe za zmanjšanje strukturno presežnih zmogljivosti v ribiški industriji;
Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to modify the relevant legislation to address, among other things, the issue of overcapacity, and to propose measures to reduce structural overcapacity in the fishing industry;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda druge politične rešitve, s katerimi bi se zmanjšalo potrebe po kontrolah in kaznih s povečanjem odgovornosti in interesa posameznih profesionalnih ribičev glede obnovljivega staleža;
Calls upon the Commission to review alternative political solutions under which the need for controls and sanctions would be reduced by increasing individual professional fishermen's responsibility for, and interest in, viable stocks;
Del VII: Posebno poročilo št. 9/2007 (v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 248(4) Pogodbe ES) o ocenjevanju okvirnih programov EU za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (RTR) – je mogoče pristop Komisije izboljšati?
Part VII: Special Report 9/2007 (pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, of the EC Treaty) on Evaluating the EU Research and Technological Development (RTD) framework programmes - could the Commission's approach be improved?
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da so bile v revizijo zajete ureditve o spremljanju in ocenjevanju, ki veljajo od leta 1995 za vsaj tri programska obdobja, in tudi pogled na okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj (RTR) 2007–2013;
Acknowledges that the audit covered the monitoring and evaluation arrangements in place for the last three programming periods since 1995 and also an outlook for the RTD framework programme 2007 to 2013;
poudarja, da je bilo okvirnim programom v obdobju 1995 – 2006 dodeljenih 42,63 milijard EUR, kar je povzročilo, da so postali najpomembnejši finančni instrument, ki prispeva k uresničevanju lizbonske strategije; v okviru trenutnega finančnega okvira je sedmi okvirni program prejel 50,52 milijard EUR;
Emphasizes that the framework programmes running between 1995 and 2006 were endowed with EUR 42,63 billion, making them the most important financial instrument contributing to the Lisbon Strategy; under the current financial framework, the 7th framework programme received EUR 50,52 billion;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče zastavilo vprašanje o tem, ali je imela Komisija ustrezen pristop k ocenjevanju rezultatov okvirnih programov, ter je pri tem usmerilo pozornost predvsem na logiko posega, strategijo ocenjevanja in metodologije;
Notes that the ECA addressed the question of whether the Commission's approach to assessing the results of the framework programmes was adequate, looking in particular at the intervention logic, the evaluation strategy and methodologies;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija že v preteklih letih uvedla znatno število izboljšav;
Welcomes that over the years the Commission has already introduced a considerable number of improvements;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče opozorilo na skromno opredelitev programskih ciljev in pomanjkanje logike posega; vsekakor pa priznava, da o programskih ciljih odločajo zainteresirane strani in sozakonodajalci; zato poziva oblikovalce odločitev, naj posebno pozornost posvetijo opredelitvi dosegljivih ciljev; priznava, da sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj Sklep št. 1982/2006/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o Sedmem okvirnem programu Evropske skupnosti za raziskave, tehnološki razvoj in predstavitvene dejavnosti (2007–2013) (UL L 412, 30.12.2006, str.
Observes that the ECA noticed poorly defined programme objectives and a lack of explicit intervention logic; acknowledges however that programme objectives are decided by stakeholders and the co-legislators; calls therefore on the decision-makers to pay particular attention to the definition of attainable objectives; recognises that a more explicit intervention logic is embedded in the 7th RTD Framework Programme Decision No 1982/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) (OJ L 412, 30.12.2006, p.
vsebuje jasnejšo logiko posega; poudarja, da morajo biti cilji operativni in izmerljivi (primerjanje uspešnosti), da se omogoči uporaba kazalnikov uspešnosti in uspešno spremljanje;
; underlines that objectives must be operational and measurable ("benchmarking") to allow for the use of performance indicators and effective monitoring;
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče kritiziralo pomanjkanje celostne strategije ocenjevanja; s tem v zvezi poudarja izboljšave, ki sta jih uvedla ocena vpliva in predhodno ocenjevanje sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj ( SEK(2005)0430 );
Notices that the ECA criticized the absence of a comprehensive evaluation strategy; points in this context to the improvements introduced by the impact assessment and ex-ante evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme ( SEC(2005)0430 );
je seznanjen s kritiko Računskega sodišča glede dejstva, da obstoječi mehanizmi za usklajevanje med generalnimi direktorati, ki so izvajali okvirne programe za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj, niso bili učinkoviti; na tej stopnji ga ideja o ustanovitvi skupnega urada za ocenjevanje še vedno ne prepriča; predlaga, naj raje generalni direktorat za raziskave prevzame več odgovornosti in usklajevalno vlogo; se strinja z Evropskim računskim sodiščem, da bi bilo treba na zgodnji stopnji pridobiti nasvet zunanjega strokovnjaka, ki bi moral ostati v veljavi za zagotavljanje usklajenega in povezanega pristopa, zlasti zaradi tega, ker so ocenjevanja predvidena za leto 2008 (naknadno ocenjevanje šestega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj), leto 2009 (stvarno vmesno poročilo o sedmem okvirnem programu za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj), leto 2010 (vmesno ocenjevanje sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj) in za leto 2015 (naknadno ocenjevanje sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj);
Acknowledges the ECA's criticism that the existing coordination mechanisms among directorates general implementing the RTD framework programmes were not effective; remains however, at this stage, unconvinced by the idea of creating a "joint evaluation office"; suggests rather that the Directorate General for Research assume more responsibility and a coordinating role; shares the ECA's view that external expert advice should be established at an early stage and remain in place to guarantee a consistent and coherent approach, in particular as evaluations are scheduled for 2008 (ex-post evaluation of the 6th RTD framework programme), for 2009 (factual interim report on the 7th RTD framework programme), for 2010 (mid-term evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme) and for 2015 (ex-post evaluation of the 7th RTD framework programme);
ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče podalo pripombo o neustreznih metodoloških smernicah; zato poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o objavi priročnika za ocenjevanje; zaveda se, da so bile zahteve za poročanje pregledane v okviru sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj z namenom, da se vzpostavi trdnejša podatkovna baza za ocenjevanje in spremljanje;
Notes the ECA's remark that inadequate methodological guidance was provided; calls therefore on the Commission to consider publishing an evaluation manual; is aware that the reporting requirements were revised under the 7th RTD framework programme with a view to creating a more robust data base for evaluation and monitoring;
meni, da bo kakovost vmesnih in naknadnih ocenjevanj izboljšala razpoložljive pogoje in načine delovanja (tj. izmerljive cilje, pričakovani učinek, uspešno spremljanje, dobro podatkovno zbirko); poudarja, da bodo ocenjevanja koristnejša, če se bodo okvirni programi prilagajali ("programi učenja"), zaključki pa uporabljali za izboljšanje potekajočih programov;
Is of the opinion that the quality of the mid-term and ex-post evaluations will improve the clearer the terms of reference which are provided (i.e. measurable objectives, expected impact, effective monitoring, a sound data base); emphasises that evaluations will be more useful if framework programmes are adaptable ("learning" programmes) and conclusions drawn can be used to improve ongoing programmes;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri izvajanju načrtovanih ocenjevanj za leto 2008, 2009, 2010 in 2015 upošteva priporočila Računskega sodišča;
Calls on the Commission to bear in mind the recommendations of the ECA when carrying out the scheduled evaluations in 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2015;
poziva Računsko sodišče, naj dokonča svoje revizije pravočasno za postopek razrešnice za leto 2010 in o tem poroča Odboru za proračunski nadzor; poziva Računsko sodišče, naj preveri tudi zneske, ki so bili porabljeni za ocenjevanje v odnosu do vrednosti posameznih programov, in na kakšen način se ta odstotek nanaša na druge programe za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj v tretjih državah (na primer v Kanadi).
Calls on the ECA to follow up its audit in time for the 2010 discharge exercise and to report back to the Committee on Budgetary Control; asks the ECA to also look at the amounts spent on evaluations in relation to the value of specific programmes and at how this percentage relates to other RTD programmes in third countries (e.g. Canada).
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament ( C6-0363/2007 – 2007/2038(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 22 April 2008 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2006, section I - European Parliament ( C6-0363/2007 – 2007/2038(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnega zaključnega računa Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2006 – Zvezek I ( SEK(2007)1055 – C6-0363/2007 ) UL C 274, 15.11.2007, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 – Volume I ( SEC(2007)1055 - C6-0363/2007 ) OJ C 274, 15.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila o izvrševanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament UL C 318, 29.12.2007.
having regard to the report on budgetary and financial management - financial year 2006, Section I - European Parliament OJ C 318, 29.12.2007.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila notranjega revizorja za leto 2006,
having regard to the Internal Auditor's annual report for 2006,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o izvrševanju proračuna za proračunsko leto 2006 z odgovori institucij UL C 273, 15.11.2007, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2006, together with the audited institutions' replies OJ C 273, 15.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo predloži Računsko sodišče v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES UL C 274, 15.11.2007, str.
having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty OJ C 274, 15.11.2007, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 272(10) in člena 275 Pogodbe ES ter člena 179a Pogodbe Euratom,
having regard to Articles 272(10) and 275 of the EC Treaty and Article 179a of the Euratom Treaty,
, ter zlasti členov 37 in 146 Uredbe,
, and in particular Articles 145, 146 and 147 thereof,
ob upoštevanju člena 13 notranjih pravil o izvrševanju proračuna Evropskega parlamenta PE 349.540/Bur/ann/def.
having regard to Article 13 of the Internal Rules on the implementation of the European Parliament's budget PE 349.540/Bur/ann/fin.
ob upoštevanju člena 147(1) finančne uredbe, po katerem vsaka institucija Evropske skupnosti sprejme potrebne ukrepe na podlagi ugotovitev, izraženih v sklepu o razrešnici Evropskega parlamenta,
having regard to Article 147(1) of the Financial Regulation, which requires each Community institution to take all appropriate steps to act on the observations accompanying the European Parliament's discharge decision,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2005 o smernicah za oddelke II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII(A) in VIII(B) ter o predhodnem načrtu odhodkov Evropskega parlamenta (oddelek I) za proračunski postopek v letu 2006 UL C 320 E, 15.12.2005, str.
having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2005 on the guidelines for Sections II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII(A) and VIII(B) and on the European Parliament's preliminary draft estimates (Section I) for the 2006 budget procedure OJ C 320 E, 15.12.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0091/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0091/2008 ),
ker je Računsko sodišče opozorilo na pomanjkljivosti v zakonodajnem okviru, ki so ga za plačilo dodatkov za parlamentarno pomoč poslancem Evropskega parlamenta vzpostavili predsedstvo in kvestorji, ter v njegovem izvajanju,
whereas the Court of Auditors has highlighted insufficiencies in the regulatory framework established by the Bureau and the Quaestors concerning the payment of parliamentary assistance allowances as well as in the resultant implementation,
ker je generalni sekretar 21. februarja 2007 potrdil, da je prepričan, da je bil proračun Parlamenta izvršen v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja in da kontrolni in nadzorni sistem daje potrebna zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovanja,
whereas the Secretary-General certified on 21 February 2007 that he was reasonably certain that the budget of Parliament has been executed in line with the principles of sound financial management and that the control and monitoring system provides the necessary guarantee of the legality and regularity of operations,
podeli svojemu predsedniku razrešnico glede izvrševanja proračuna Parlamenta za proračunsko leto 2006;
Grants its President discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Parliament budget for the financial year 2006;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in resolucijo, ki je del sklepa, posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, Računskemu sodišču, Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov ter poskrbi za objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije (serija L).
Instructs its President to forward this Decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. aprila 2008 s pripombami, ki so del sklepa o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2006, Oddelek I – Evropski parlament ( C6-0363/2007 – 2007/2038(DEC) )
European Parliament resolution of 22 April 2008 with observations forming an integral part of the decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2006, section I – European Parliament ( C6-0363/2007 – 2007/2038(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju končnega zaključnega računa Evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2006 – Zvezek I (SEK (2007)1055 – C6-0363/2007 ) UL C 274, 15.11.2007, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2006 – Volume I ( SEC(2007)1055 - C6-0363/2007 ) OJ C 274, 15.11.2007, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1525/2007 (UL L 343, 27.12.2007, str.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1525/2007(OJ L 343, 27.12.2007, p.
ker je Računsko sodišče opozorilo, da predsedstvo ni zagotovilo učinkovite uporabe pravil o plačilu nadomestil za parlamentarno pomoč poslancem, za kar je potrebno predložiti ustrezna dokazila,
whereas the Court of Auditors has highlighted that the Bureau has not ensured that the rules concerning the payment of parliamentary assistance allowances requiring the submission of adequate supporting documentation have been implemented effectively,
ker je treba zagotoviti spremljanje njegove resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2006 UL L 177, 6.7.2007, str.
whereas it is necessary to ensure the follow-up to its resolution of 26 September 2006 OJ L 177, 6.7.2007, p.
in resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007 UL L 187, 15.7.2008, str.
and to its resolution of 24 April 2007 OJ L 187, 15.7.2008, p.
o razrešnici za proračunski leti 2004 in 2005 in oceniti napredek pri izvajanju njegovih priporočil,
on the discharge for 2004 and 2005, and to evaluate the progress made in implementing its recommendations,
ker je treba upoštevati politične prednostne naloge za proračunsko leto 2006, in sicer: utrditi širitev iz leta 2004, pripraviti širitev v letu 2007, izboljšati politiko obveščanja in sporočanja ter izboljšati pomoč poslancem;
having regard to the political priorities of the 2006 financial year, i.e.: consolidating the 2004 enlargement, preparing for the 2007 enlargement, improving information and communication policy, and improving assistance to Members,
pozdravlja in podpira trdno zavezo predsednika, da bo statut za pomočnike, ki ga bo predlagala Komisija in potrdil Svet, začel veljati sočasno s statutom poslancev Sklep Evropskega parlamenta 2005/684/ES, Euratom z dne 28. septembra 2005 o sprejetju statuta poslancev Evropskega parlamenta (UL L 262, 7.10.2005, str.
Welcomes and supports its President's firm commitment to ensure that the assistants' statute, to be proposed by the Commission and approved by the Council, enters into force at the same time as the Members' Statute Decision 2005/684/EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 28 September 2005 adopting the Statute for Members of the European Parliament (OJ L 262, 7.10.2005, p.
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj v celoti sodelujeta s Parlamentom ter zagotovita, da bo novi statut za pomočnike sprejet pred naslednjimi evropskimi volitvami junija 2009;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to fully cooperate with it in order to ensure that the new statute for assistants is adopted before the next European elections in June 2009;
poudarja, da je Parlament edini organ, pristojen za podelitev razrešnice Člen 276(1) Pogodbe ES.
Stresses that Parliament is the sole discharge authority Article 276(1) of the EC Treaty.
, ter da je razrešnica politična odločitev; da bi prišel do te politične odločitve, Parlament v skladu s členom 276(1) in (2) Pogodbe ES upošteva poleg vseh omenjenih dokumentov tudi vse informacije, za katere meni, da so potrebne;
and that discharge is a political decision; in order to reach that political decision, Parliament takes account, pursuant to Article 276(1) and (2) of the EC Treaty, not only of the documents mentioned therein, but also of all information which it considers necessary;
meni, da bi bilo treba vse institucije in organe iz členov 70 in 71 njegovega Poslovnika obravnavati enakovredno, po načelih in postopkih, ki jih upošteva pri vsakoletni razrešnici;
Considers that all the institutions and bodies referred to in Rules 70 and 71 of its Rules of Procedure should be treated on an equal footing, on the basis of the same principles and procedures as those followed in the annual discharge exercise;
poudarja, da se lahko vse institucije in organi opremijo s političnimi in/ali upravnimi strukturami, ki so najprimernejše za njihove potrebe; zato poudarja, da bi moral Parlament zaradi spoštovanja različnih struktur podeliti razrešnico institucijam in organom kot takim, ki jih lahko predstavlja ena sama oseba, zato da jim zagotovi prepoznavnost;
Recalls that all the institutions and bodies are entitled to equip themselves with the political and/or administrative structures best suited to their needs; stresses that, consequently, in order to respect those different structures, Parliament must give discharge to those institutions and bodies as such, which may be represented by an individual in order to ensure their visibility;
potrjuje, da morajo tako Parlament kot vse druge institucije in organi določiti najprimernejšo raven odgovornosti kot odgovor na pripombe, ki jih je imel Parlament pri postopku za podelitev razrešnice;
Confirms that is both for Parliament and for each institution or body to identify the most suitable level of responsibility for responding to Parliament's remarks made in the discharge procedure;
opozarja, da je Parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 24. aprila 2007, kakor je navedeno zgoraj, izjavil, da bi morale k podelitvi razrešnice spadati tudi vse odločitve predsednika, predsedstva in Konference predsednikov, ker so politično odgovorni izvoljeni poslanci in ne uradniki; zato poziva predsednika in podpredsednika, pristojnega za proračun, naj za vzpostavitev političnega dialoga sodelujeta na bodočih sejah Odbora za proračunski nadzor;
Recalls that Parliament stated in its resolution of 24 April 2007, as cited above, that the discharge exercise should also cover the decisions taken by the President, the Bureau and the Conference of Presidents, since political responsibility lies with the elected Members, not the officials; calls, therefore, on the President and the Vice-president responsible for the budget to participate in the future meetings of the Committee on Budgetary Control with a view to establishing a political dialogue;
opozarja, da v skladu s členom 71 svojega Poslovnika plenarna skupščina, ki jo predstavlja njen predsednik, podeli razrešnico Parlamentu;
Recalls that the plenary gives discharge to Parliament, represented by its President, pursuant to Rule 71 of the Rules of Procedure;
izraža zadovoljstvo, ker je predsednik Parlamenta sprejel načelo političnega dialoga pri postopku za razrešnico in ker je na njegovo pobudo podpredsednik Parlamenta, odgovoren za proračun in proračunski nadzor, ki je tudi predsednik Odbora za nadzor revizij, sodeloval pri političnem dialogu z Odborom za proračunski nadzor na javni predstavitvi 21. januarja 2008; poziva, naj ta dialog v bodoče temelji na pisni dokumentaciji, kjer bodo zbrani sklepi predsedstva in konference predsednikov, ki imajo finančni vpliv;
Welcomes the acceptance by the President of Parliament of the principle of a political dialogue in the context of the discharge procedure, as well as the fact that, having been requested to do so, the Vice-president of Parliament responsible for the budget and budgetary control, who is also the chairman of the Audit Committee, participated in a political dialogue with the Committee on Budgetary Control at a public hearing held on 21 January 2008; calls for this dialogue to be grounded in future in written documentation consisting of the decisions of the Bureau and the Conference of Presidents which have a financial impact;