natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19.10.2009 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 110(4) poslovnika,
19.10.2009 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 110(4) of the Rules of Procedure
o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji in drugih državah članicah EU
on freedom of information in Italy and in other EU Member States
PE428.694v01-00 } PE428.695v01-00 } PE428.697v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji in drugih državah članicah EU
PE428.694v01-00 } PE428.695v01-00 } PE428.697v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy and in other EU Member States
– ob upoštevanju mednarodnih in evropskih obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic, med drugimi tistih, ki so zapisane v konvencijah Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah in v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to international and European human rights obligations, such as those contained in the UN conventions on human rights and in the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
– ob upoštevanju člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah glede svobode izražanja in obveščanja ter pravice do pluralnosti medijev,
– having regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism,
– ob upoštevanju člena 21 Ustave Italijanske republike,
– having regard to Article 21 of the Constitution of the Italian Republic,
A. ker je glede na to, da italijanski državljani, tudi novinarji, zgodovinarji, filozofi, akademiki, pisatelji in učitelji trdijo, da v vsakodnevnem življenju uživajo popolno svobodo izražanja, neprimerno trditi, da se v Italiji krši svoboda obveščanja,
A. whereas it is inappropriate to claim that freedom of information is being flouted in Italy, considering that its citizens, including journalists, historians, philosophers, scholars, writers and teachers, avail themselves of freedom of expression in their everyday lives,
B. ker je pomanjkanje svobode obveščanja značilno za življenje v diktatorskih in totalitarnih režimih, ki so v preteklosti državljanom kratili temeljne pravice in svoboščine ali to še vedno počnejo,
B. whereas the lack of freedom of information is typical of life under dictatorships and totalitarian regimes which have deprived or are continuing to deprive people of their fundamental rights and freedoms,
C. ker v Italiji svobodo tiska zagotavlja ustava, v kateri je zapisana tudi popolna svoboda misli in izražanja,
C. whereas in Italy freedom of the press is guaranteed by the Constitution, in which the right to full freedom of thought and expression is enshrined,
D. ker je v Italiji široka paleta svobodnih in neodvisnih medijev, vključno s časopisi, radijskimi in televizijskimi postajami na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, vsem pa je zagotovljena popolna svoboda obveščanja in izražanja,
D. whereas Italy has a wide range of free and independent media, including newspapers, radio and television operating at national, regional and local level and enjoying full freedom of information and expression,
E. ker je bilo po podatkih neodvisnega opazovalnega centra za medije iz Pavie maja in junija 2009 – med kampanjo za evropske volitve – v televizijskih dnevnikih državne televizije RAI 60 % časa namenjenega strankam opozicije, v televizijskih dnevnikih skupine Mediaset pa 49%,
E. whereas according to data from the independent Pavia Observatory concerning the media in May and June 2009 – a period coinciding with the campaign for the European elections – the air time given to representatives of opposition parties was 60% on the televised news programmes of Rai-Tv and 49% on the televised news programmes of the Mediaset Group,
F. ker je predsednik Italijanske republike Giorgio Napolitano nedavno med pogovori s poslanci Evropskega parlamenta, izvoljenimi v Italiji, opozoril, da Evropski parlament ne more delovati kot pritožbeno sodišče proti sklepom državnih parlamentov in politikam vlad ter da za to obstaja ustrezen organ,
F. whereas over the last few days the President of the Italian Republic, Mr Giorgio Napolitano, has observed – during discussions on this matter with Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – that the European Parliament 'cannot act as a court of appeal in respect of decisions by national parliaments and national government policies' and that appropriate fora exist for this purpose,
G. ker, kakor je med razpravo o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji dejala komisarka Viviane Reding, poslanci v Evropskem parlamentu ne bi smeli „izkoriščati institucij EU za reševanje problemov, ki bi jih bilo treba v skladu s pogodbami reševati na državni ravni“,
G. whereas, as stated by Commissioner Reding on 8 October 2009 during the debate on freedom of information in Italy, Members of the European Parliament should not 'make use of the EU institutions to solve problems which should, under our Treaties, be solved at national level',
H. ker je v Italiji uporaba pravnih sredstev v primerih suma obrekovanja na voljo vsakomur in je to zakonita pravica, ki jo lahko uživa vsakdo in so jo v preteklosti udejanjali politiki iz vseh strank; ker se uresničevanje te pravice nikakor ne more obravnavati kot ustrahovanje,
H. whereas in Italy legal redress in cases of alleged defamation is available to every individual, this being a statutory right enjoyed by every individual and one that has been exercised by political leaders of every hue in the past; whereas the exercise of a right may in no case be considered as an act of intimidation,
2. poudarja vlogo, ki jo imajo v Italiji lokalni in regionalni mediji pri spodbujanju medijskega pluralizma ter pri ohranjanju raznolikosti regionalnih jezikov in kultur;
Stresses the role which the local and regional media in Italy play in promoting the pluralism of information sources and preserving the diversity of regional languages and cultures;
o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji in Evropski uniji
on freedom of information in Italy and in the European Union
PE428.696v01-00 } PE428.700v01-00 } PE428.701v01-00 } PE428.702v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji in Evropski uniji
PE428.696v01-00 } PE428.700v01-00 } PE428.701v01-00 } PE428.702v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy and in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in zlasti njenih členov, ki se nanašajo na spoštovanje, spodbujanje in zaščito temeljnih pravic, pa tudi členov 6, 22, 43, 49, 83, 87, 95 in 151 Pogodbe ES,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union, in particular its articles relating to respect for, and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights, and to Articles 6, 22, 43, 49, 83, 87, 95 and 151 of the EC Treaty,
– ob upoštevanju člena 11 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in člena 10 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah v zvezi s svobodo izražanja in obveščanja ter pravico do pluralnosti medijev,
– having regard to Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, concerning the freedom of expression and information and the right to media pluralism,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o medijskem pluralizmu v državah članicah EU ( SEK(2007)0032 ),
– having regard to the Commission's working document on media pluralism in EU Member States ( SEC(2007)0032 ),
– ob upoštevanju tristopenjskega pristopa do medijske pluralnosti, ki ga je opredelila Komisija, in neodvisne študije o kazalnikih pluralizma, ki so jo zanjo opravile Katoliška univerza v Leuvnu (ICRI), Srednjeevropska univerza (CMCS) in Mednarodna poslovna šola Jönköping (MMTC), skupaj s svetovalnim podjetjem Ernst & Young v Belgiji, in ki je bila dokončana leta 2009,
– having regard to the three-step approach to media pluralism defined by the Commission and to the independent study carried out by Katholieke Universiteit Leuven – ICRI, Central European University – CMCS and Jönköping International Business School – MMTC, together with a consultancy firm, Ernst & Young Belgium, on behalf of the Commission and finalised in 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. septembra 2008 o koncentraciji in pluralizmu medijev v Evropski uniji Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0459 .
– having regard to its resolution of 25 September 2008 concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0459 .
A. ker Evropska unija jamči in spodbuja svobodo izražanja in obveščanja, kot je zapisano v členu 11 Listine o temeljnih pravlnost medijev osnovni pravici, in ker ti pravici zajemata svobodo izražanja mnenja ter svobodo prejemanja in posredovanja informacij brez vmešavanja ali pritiska javnih oblasti,
A. whereas the European Union guarantees and promotes freedom of expression and of information, as enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, for which media freedom and pluralism are an essential prerequisite, and whereas these rights include freedom to express opinions and freedom to receive and communicate information without interference or pressure from public authorities,
B. ker Komisija kljub večkratnim pozivom Parlamenta, da je treba sprejeti direktivo o pluralnosti obveščanja in koncentraciji medijev, med revizijo direktive o televiziji brez meja ni pretehtala teh vprašanj, ampak se je ukvarjala samo z opredelitvijo posebnega tristopenjskega načrta na to temo, ki ga tvorijo priprava delovnega dokumenta (izdan leta 2007), opredelitev kazalnikov o ravni pluralnosti (iz neodvisne študije, izdane julija 2009) in predlog sporočila o teh kazalnikih (predvideno šele za leto 2010),
B. whereas, despite repeated calls by Parliament for a directive on information pluralism and media concentration, the Commission did not include these issues in the scope of the revision of the 'TV without Frontiers' Directive, committing itself instead to define a specific three-step roadmap on this issue, consisting of the elaboration of a working document (issued in 2007), the definition of indicators on the level of pluralism (contained in an independent study, issued in July 2009) and a proposal for a communication on these indicators (scheduled only for 2010),
C. ker je Evropski parlament Komisijo v več resolucijah pozval, naj spodbuja ukrepe za zagotavljanje pluralnosti in reševanje vprašanja medijske koncentracije, nemudoma izda sporočilo o zaščiti pluralnosti medijev in medijski koncentraciji v državah članicah ter čim prej dopolni regulativni okvir s predlogom direktive o teh vprašanjih, pri čemer naj se sklicuje na jasno pravno podlago iz ustanovnih pogodb,
C. whereas Parliament has repeatedly invited the Commission, through several resolutions, to promote actions to guarantee pluralism and address the problem of media concentration, to issue an urgent communication on the protection of pluralism of the media and media concentration in Member States and to urgently complete the regulatory framework with a proposal for a directive on the same issues, based on the legal basis that the Treaties clearly provide,
D. ker obstajajo znamenja, da je medijski pluralizem v več državah članicah ogrožen; ker je organizacija Freedom House v poročilu o svobodi tiska Italijo uvrstila na 73. mesto in opozorila na kritične razmere v Romuniji in Bolgariji; ker je visoki predstavnik OVSE za svobodo medijev v pismu, naslovljenem na italijanske oblasti in državno zvezo italijanskega tiska z dne 20. septembra 2009 prav tako izrazil zaskrbljenost glede razmer v Italiji;
D. whereas there are signs that media pluralism is under attack in several Member States; whereas Freedom House has placed Italy in 73rd place and has also mentioned the critical situation in Romania and Bulgaria in its annual Report on the Freedom of the Press; whereas the High Representative of OSCE for Media Freedom also expressed concern on the situation in Italy in a letter addressed on 20 September to Italian authorities, as well as the National Federation of the Italian Press,
3. je zlasti zaskrbljen zaradi razmer v Italiji in meni, da bi lahko imele posledice za vso Evropo in da bi neukrepanje Evropske unije oslabilo njeno verodostojnost pri določanju meril na področju temeljnih pravicah v zunanjih odnosih in v pristopnem postopku;
Is particularly concerned about the situation in Italy, and considers that this could have consequences for Europe as a whole and that a lack of action by the EU would weaken its credibility in setting fundamental rights benchmarks in external relations as well as in the accession process;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj potem, ko bo v sporočilu opredelila ustrezne kazalnike za ugotavljanje različnih ravni pluralnosti in neodvisnosti javnih medijev, kakor je Evropski parlament že večkrat zahteval in kar je napovedala tudi Komisija, nemudoma in ob polnem sodelovanju bodočega komisarja, pristojnega za področje temeljnih pravic, pripravi predlog direktive o medijski koncentraciji in zaščiti pluralnosti;
Urges the Commission, as a matter of urgency, to issue a proposal for a directive on media concentration and on the protection of pluralism, with the full involvement of the future Commissioner in charge of fundamental rights, after having previously defined in a communication a set of appropriate indicators for determining levels of information pluralism and independence of public service media, as requested several times by Parliament and as announced by the Commission itself;
21.10.2009 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 110(4) poslovnika,
21.10.2009 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 110(4) of the Rules of Procedure
PE428.703v01-00 } PE428.704v01-00 } PE428.706v01-00 } PE428.717v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o prihajajočem vrhunskem srečanju EU-ZDA in zasedanju čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta
PE428.703v01-00 } PE428.704v01-00 } PE428.706v01-00 } PE428.717v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on the upcoming EU-US Summit and the Transatlantic Economic Council Meeting
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 8. maja 2008 o čezatlantskem ekonomskem svetu, z dne 5. junija 2008 o prihajajočem vrhunskem srečanju EU-ZDA ter z dne 26. marca 2009 o stanju čezatlantskih odnosov po volitvah v ZDA,
– having regard to its resolutions of 8 May 2008 on the Transatlantic Economic Council, 5 June 2008 on the EU-US Summit, and 26 March 2009 on the state of transatlantic relations in the aftermath of the US elections,
– ob upoštevanju zaključkov vrha EU-ZDA v Pragi dne 5. aprila 2009,
– having regard to the outcome of the EU-US Summit held on 5 April 2009 in Prague,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave in poročila o napredku, ki sta bila sprejeta na tretjem srečanju čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta 16. oktobra 2008, ter skupne izjave, sprejete na srečanju v okviru čezatlantskega dialoga zakonodajalcev aprila 2009 v Pragi,
– having regard to the Joint Statement and progress report adopted at the third Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) meeting on 16 October 2008, and to the Joint Statement adopted at the Transatlantic Legislators' Dialogue Meeting in April 2009 in Prague,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. septembra 2009 o načrtovanem mednarodnem sporazumu o posredovanju podatkov o finančnih transakcijah ministrstvu za finance Združenih držav za preprečevanje terorizma oziroma njegovega financiranja in boj proti njemu,
– having regard to its resolution of 17 September 2009 on the envisaged international agreement to make available to the United States Treasury Department financial payment messaging data to prevent and combat terrorism and terrorist financing,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. oktobra 2009 o vrhunskem srečanju skupine G20, ki je potekalo 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu,
– having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2009 on the Pittsburgh G-20 Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009,
A. ker Evropska unija pozdravlja pripravljenost ameriške administracije za sodelovanje na mednarodnem področju ter okrepitev odnosov med EU in ZDA, ki je temelj zunanje politike EU,
A. whereas the European Union welcomes the US Administration's cooperative attitude in the international field and a strengthening of the EU-US relationship, which is a cornerstone of the EU's external policies,
B. ker igrata EU in ZDA strateško vlogo pri svetovnih gospodarskih izzivih, saj njihov bruto domači proizvod (BDP) predstavlja več kot polovico svetovnega BDP, obe partnerici pa sta oblikovali največje dvostransko trgovinsko in investicijsko partnerstvo na svetu, saj dosega skoraj 40 % svetovne trgovine,
B. whereas the EU and the US have a strategic role as regards the global economic challenges, as their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) represents more than half of the global GDP and the two partners have the world's strongest bilateral trade and investment partnership, accounting for almost 40% of world trade,
C. ker imajo EU in ZDA v svetovni politični areni skupne politične interese in deljeno odgovornost za spodbujanje miru, spoštovanje človekovih pravic in stabilnosti ter spoprijemanje z različnimi nevarnostmi in izzivi na svetovni ravni, kot so širjenje jedrskega orožja, terorizem, podnebne spremembe, varnost preskrbe z energijo in razvoj gospodarstev z nizkimi emisijami ogljika, izkoreninjenje revščine in uresničevanje drugih razvojnih ciljev tisočletja,
C. whereas the EU and the US also have common political interests and a shared responsibility in the global political arena for promoting peace, respect for human rights and stability and for tackling various global dangers and challenges, such as nuclear proliferation, terrorism, climate change, energy security and the development of low carbon economies, and the eradication of poverty and attainment of other Millennium Development Goals,
D. ker si mora čezatlantski ekonomski svet še naprej prizadevati za uresničenje pravega, integriranega čezatlantskega trga do leta 2015, in sicer z odpravljanjem ovir za trgovanje, kar bo bistveno prispevalo k ponovnemu zagonu rasti in okrevanju gospodarstva,
D. whereas the work of the Transatlantic Economic Council (TEC) needs to continue towards the goal of an integrated transatlantic market by 2015 by reducing barriers to trade, the achievement of which will be essential in order to relaunch economic growth and bring about recovery,
E. ker je za uspešno izpolnitev sporazuma o razvoju iz Dohe potrebno skupno vodstvo EU in ZDA,
E. whereas moreover joint EU-US leadership is needed for the successful completion of the Doha Development Round,
F. ker je pomembno, da se v delovanju čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta ustrezno odraža vloga zakonodajalcev in da so prednostne naloge Evropskega parlamenta primerno upoštevane,
F. whereas it is important that the role of legislators is duly reflected in the TEC process and that the priorities of the European Parliament are adequately taken into account,
H. ker bo Evropska unija z orodji zunanje politike iz lizbonske pogodbe lahko prevzela pomembnejšo in skladnejšo vlogo na mednarodnem prizorišču,
H. whereas the foreign policy tools of the Lisbon Treaty will enable the EU to play a stronger and more coherent role on the international scene,
J. ker nedavne raziskave, kot na primer raziskava Čezatlantski trendi 2009 nemškega Marshallovega sklada, kažejo, da ima ameriška administracija večjo podporo državljanov EU kot kdajkoli prej, kar je osnova za ponovno oživitev odnosov med EU in ZDA,
J. whereas recent surveys, such as the Transatlantic Trends 2009 of the German Marshall Funds, show unprecedented popular support among EU citizens for the US Administration, which provides a basis for a revitalisation of EU-US relations,
1. ponovno poudarja, da so odnosi med EU in ZDA najpomembnejše strateško partnerstvo za EU, ter vztraja, da je pomembno, da EU in ameriška administracija okrepita strateški dialog, sodelovanje in usklajevanje pri spoprijemanju s svetovnimi izzivi in regionalnimi konflikti; poziva Komisijo, naj po vrhunskem srečanju predloži sporočilo o strateškem partnerstvu EU-ZDA;
Reaffirms that EU-US relations are the most important strategic partnership for the EU and insists on the importance of the EU and the US Administration's intensifying their strategic dialogue, cooperation and coordination when dealing with global challenges and regional conflicts; calls on the Commission to submit, after the Summit, a communication on a strategic EU-US partnership;
3. meni, da morata obe partnerici na vrhu EU-ZDA prevzeti vodilno vlogo pri izvajanju obvez skupine G-20; zato poziva k usklajevanju med reformnim svežnjem ZDA za finančni sektor in sedanjimi zakonodajnimi reformami EU, vključno s finančno nadzorno strukturo, in poziva obe partnerici, naj pospešita sodelovanje pri posodabljanju Mednarodnega denarnega sklada;
Considers it necessary that at the EU-US Summit both partners should take the leading role on the implementation of the G-20 commitments; calls therefore for coordination of the US reform package for the financial sector and the current EU legislative reforms, including the financial supervisory structure, and calls on both partners to reinforce their cooperation on the modernisation of the IMF;
7. poudarja pomen Nata kot temelja čezatlantske varnosti; meni, da je treba razvoj dogodkov v tej širši varnostni strukturi obravnavati v dialogu z Rusijo in državami članicami OVSE, ki niso članice EU, da bi obnovili čezatlantsko soglasje o varnosti;
Underlines the importance of NATO as the cornerstone of transatlantic security; considers that relevant developments in this wider security structure should be addressed in dialogue with Russia and the non-EU OSCE Member States in order to renew the transatlantic consensus on security;
10. poudarja, da negotovost o naravi iranskega jedrskega programa ogroža sistem za neširjenje orožja in stabilnost v regiji in svetu; podpira cilj, da se v pogajanjih z Iranom poišče rešitev z uporabo dvojne strategije dialoga in sankcij v sodelovanju z drugimi članicami Varnostnega sveta in Mednarodno agencijo za atomsko energijo;
Underlines that the uncertainties about the nature of the Iranian nuclear programme endanger the non-proliferation system and stability in the region and the world; supports the objective of finding a negotiated solution with Iran, following the dual strategy of dialogue and sanctions, in coordination with other members of the Security Council and the International Atomic Energy Agency;
Zasedanje čezatlantskega ekonomskega sveta in njegova okrepitev
Transatlantic Economic Council Meeting and the Reinforcement of the TEC
20. zahteva od Komisije, da določi natančen časovni načrt za obstoječe prepreke pri doseganju tega cilja; opozarja na raziskavo, ki jo je Evropski parlament odobril in financiral v svojem proračunu za leto 2007; želi vedeti, zakaj Komisija doslej še ni objavila nobenega od teh dokumentov, čeprav jo je Evropski parlament večkrat pozval k temu; določa 15. november 2009 kot skrajni rok za njihovo predložitev in objavo;
Requests the Commission to set out a detailed road map of existing obstacles to the attainment of that target; recalls the study which the European Parliament authorised and financed in its 2007 budget; wonders why neither of these documents has so far been released by the Commission despite repeated requests by the European Parliament that it do so; sets 15 November 2009 as the final date for their submission for publication;
23. kljub temu meni, da čezatlantski ekonomski svet ne bi smel zanemarjati vpliva, ki so ga na trgovinske dejavnosti imeli ukrepi vlad v zvezi s standardi zasebnosti in varstva podatkov, biometričnih specifikacij, varnosti zračnega prometa, potovalne dokumentacije in izmenjave podatkov o potnikih;
Believes nonetheless that the impact on commercial activities of actions taken by governments in this context on matters such as privacy and data protection standards, biometric specifications, aviation security, travel documentation and exchanges of passenger information, should not be neglected by the TEC;