natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so oblasti Združenega kraljestva 10. avgusta 2006 razglasile odkritje domnevne teroristične zarote, v kateri naj bi bilo uporabljeno tekoče razstrelivo na krovu civilnih letal, in sprejele omejitve za predmete, ki jih potniki smejo nesti na letalo v ročni prtljagi; podobno so ravnale ZDA, da bi se izognile tveganju terorističnega napada; ker je bil mednarodni civilni letalski promet več dni ustavljen ali resno moten na mednarodni, evropski in nacionalni ravni,
whereas on 10 August 2006 the United Kingdom authorities announced the discovery of an alleged terrorist plot involving the use of liquid explosives on board civil aircraft and adopted restrictions on the items passengers were allowed to carry with them in their hand luggage, an approach similar to that followed by the US, in order to avoid all risks of terrorist attack; whereas international civil aircraft traffic was blocked or seriously disrupted for several days at international, European and national level,
ker so bili nekateri omejitveni ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele države članice, spremenjeni in omiljeni, potem ko so izredne razmere minile; ker so poročila navajala tudi, da odkrita teroristična zarota ni bila ogrožujoča, saj zarotniki še niso imeli vozovnic, potnih listov ali strokovnega znanja, da bi izvedli svoj teroristični načrt,
whereas some of the restrictive measures adopted by Member States were subsequently modified and eased, once the emergency situation passed; whereas news reports also stated that the terrorist plot that had been discovered was not imminent as the plotters did not yet have the tickets, the passports or the scientific knowledge to carry out their terrorist plan,
ker sprejetje omejitvenih ukrepov ni bilo povezano z novimi znanstvenim napredkom oziroma razvojem možnosti izdelave bombe iz tekočega razstreliva in ker Komisija in države članice do avgusta 2006 niso imele posebnih omejitvenih ukrepov za tekočine,
whereas the adoption of restrictive measures does not appear to be connected to a new scientific advancement or development in the possibility of creating a bomb through liquid explosives, and whereas until August 2006 the Commission and the Member States did not have any specific restrictive measure on liquids,
ker je bila Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1546/2006, ki je uvedla omejitve za količino tekočin, ki jih potniki smejo nesti na krov letal v ročni prtljagi, sprejeta 6. novembra 2006 in je takrat začela veljati,
whereas Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 introducing restrictions in the quantity of liquids passengers may carry on board aircraft in their hand luggage was agreed and came into force on 6 November 2006,
ker so ti ukrepi potnikom, letalskim družbam, letališkim organom in prodajalcem na drobno, kot so brezcarinske prodajalne, povzročili znatne nevšečnosti, težave, zamude in zamaške, pa tudi izgube in dodatne stroške, našteti pa so o njihovi učinkovitosti dvomili; ker so postavili EU in resnično učinkovitost evropskih varnostnih ukrepov v slabo luč; ker se je učinkovitost izvajanja ukrepov ob varnostnih pregledih opazno poslabšala, saj se zdaj pregledi tekočin v ročni prtljagi izvajajo manj strogo; ker je poleg tega izvajanje ukrepov neusklajeno oziroma se uporablja na različne načine, saj se na nekaterih evropskih letališčih enak predmet odvzame, na drugih pa ne, pregledi na različnih letališčih pa so različni;
whereas these measures have caused passengers, airline companies, airport authorities and retailers such as duty free shops considerable annoyance, inconvenience, delays and congestion, as well as losses and additional costs, and have been implemented by them with scepticism; whereas they have shed a negative light on the EU and on the real efficiency of European security measures; whereas the effective implementation of the measure at security checks has become considerably weaker since checks on liquids in hand luggage appear to take place now in a less stringent way; whereas furthermore the implementation of the measures seems not to be harmonised, or at least it is applied in different ways, since the same item can be seized in some European airports and not in others, while controls differ from airport to airport,
ker klasifikacija teh dokumentov zavezuje druge institucije, da jih obravnavajo kot zaupne, da omejijo dostop do teh informacij in seveda onemogočijo državljanom in državljankam vpogled vanje; ker zato sedanji postopki Evropskega parlamenta omogočajo skrajno omejen dostop do teh dokumentov majhnemu številu poslancev,
whereas the classification of these documents obliges other institutions to treat them in a confidential manner, restricting access to such information and, in any case, denying citizens full access to them; whereas, consequently, current European Parliament procedures provide for extremely limited access to these documents by a restricted number of MEPs,
ker lahko nekateri ukrepi, povezani z varnostjo letalstva – na primer tisti, ki jih določa Uredba (ES) št. 1546/2006 – vplivajo na temeljne pravice državljanov, kot so pravica do zasebnosti in svoboda gibanja oseb, ter imajo gospodarske posledice zaradi oviranja prostega pretoka blaga, jih je treba ustrezno obravnavati in pretehtati,
whereas some of the measures related to aviation security, such as those provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006, can have an impact on citizens' fundamental rights, such as the right to privacy and the freedom of movement of persons, as well as economic consequences, by hindering free movement of goods, which must be properly addressed and balanced,
ker v primeru, da državljan noče upoštevati ali krši pravila o tekočinah, niso predvideni posebni postopki in sankcije, niti način, kako se državljan lahko pritoži na odločitve ali sankcije, na mestu samem ali pozneje, oziroma uporabi pravno sredstvo,
whereas no specific provisions are foreseen concerning procedures and sanctions in case of refusal to follow, or breach of, the rules on liquids, as well as on how a person can contest decisions and sanctions, on the spot or at a later stage, and seek legal remedy,
ker uredba Komisije temelji samo na podatkih tajne obveščevalne službe države članice in na mnenju večine članov regulativnega odbora za varnost letalstva, medtem ko Komisija ni izvedla neodvisnih raziskav in presoje o dejanskem tveganju uporabe tekočega razstreliva na krovu letala ter o obstoju dejanske grožnje, niti presoje vplivov, ki bi upoštevala vprašanja gospodarstva in državljanske svobode in v okviru katere bi bil izveden test nujnosti, sorazmernosti in učinkovitosti,
whereas the Commission Regulation is based only on intelligence information provided by an EU Member State's secret service and on the opinion of a majority of members of the Aviation Security Regulatory Committee, while the Commission has not carried out independent studies, research or an evaluation on the actual risk of using liquid explosives on board aircraft and on the existence of an actual and real threat, nor has it carried out an impact assessment study also considering economic and civil liberty concerns, and applying a necessity, proportionality and efficiency test,
poudarja, kako izjemno pomemben je boj proti terorizmu in krepitev varnosti civilnega letalstva na mednarodni, evropski in nacionalni ravni z ukrepi, usmerjenimi v odpravljanje in zmanjševanje tveganja in posledic terorističnih napadov na potnike, letala in letališča;
Highlights the paramount importance of combating terrorism and enhancing civil aviation security at international, European and national level through measures aimed at avoiding and reducing the risks and consequences of terrorist attacks against passengers, aircraft and airports;
v celoti podpira namere Komisije na tem področju in je seznanjen z njenim dobrim delom, namenjenim vzpostavitvi skupnih in usklajenih evropskih pravil in ukrepov, s katerimi bi preglasili različna nacionalna pravila, saj ta ne bi mogla učinkovito zagotavljati primerne varnosti v Evropski uniji;
Fully supports the Commission in its intentions in this field, and takes note of its good work aimed at trying to establish common and harmonised European rules and measures, thereby overcoming different national rules which would not be efficient in guaranteeing adequate security in the European Union;
poudarja, da bi morali biti ti ukrepi upravičeni, sorazmerni in učinkoviti ter ohranjati ravnotežje med potrebno varnostjo in vplivom na pravice posameznika; meni, da morajo pretehtati, ali obstajata resnična ogroženost in tveganje, ali sta stalna ali začasna in ali vključujeta celotno EU ali nekatere bolj specifične cilje (letala, letališča, države itd.);
Stresses that these measures should be justified, proportionate and effective, striking a proper balance between the need for security and the impact on individual rights; considers that they must take into consideration the existence of a real and serious threat or risk, and the question whether it is permanent or temporary, and involves the EU as a whole or certain more specific targets (airlines, airports, countries, etc);
meni, da bi se ukrepi morali predlagati ali bi morali biti sprejeti šele takrat, ko bi se zbrale specializirane informacije in bi bil ocenjen vpliv ukrepov na vse zadevne strani in na njihove pravice, ter po čim bolj odprti in pregledni razpravi z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi in drugimi institucijami;
Believes that these measures should be proposed and agreed only after specialised information has been properly gathered and the impact of the measures on all the actors concerned and on their rights has been assessed, and after the most open and transparent discussion possible with all stakeholders and other institutions;
ne more presojati, ali so omejitve glede tekočin, ki jih določa Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1546/2006, upravičene, sorazmerne in učinkovite, saj je besedilo priloge zaupno, in ker ni dobil zadostnih in prepričljivih informacij o upravičenosti ukrepov, zlasti o verjetnosti napada s tekočim razstrelivom na letalu; o tem, ali je bila opravljena analiza širšega vpliva na družbo in ali je bil ta skrbno pretehtan; ali bi bilo mogoče za dosego istega cilja, zlasti glede časa in ciljev, sprejeti alternativne ukrepe; in o tem, kako so bili ukrepi učinkoviti pri doseganju zastavljenega cilja;
Can neither confirm nor deny the fact that the restrictions on liquids contained in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 are justified, proportionate and effective, since the Annex text is secret and since it has not been provided with sufficient and convincing information on: the justifications for the measure, in particular the feasibility of a liquid bomb attack on aircraft; whether an analysis has been made of and careful consideration given to their wider impact on society; whether alternative measures could have been taken to reach the same objective, in particular in terms of time and targets; and the measures' effectiveness in achieving their objective;
poziva Komisijo, naj opravi presojo vplivov ob upoštevanju navedenih meril in parametrov, kot so svoboden pretok ljudi in blaga, interesi potrošnikov, državljanske pravice in varnost, ter naj Parlamentu in splošni javnosti zagotovi te informacije in ocene;
Asks the Commission to make an impact assessment taking into account the aforementioned criteria and parameters such as free movement of people and goods, consumer interests, civil rights and security, and to provide Parliament and the general public with this information and evaluation;
poziva Komisijo in regulativni odbor za varnost civilnega letalstva, naj ob pregledu Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 1546/2006, ki poteka vsakih šest mesecev, glede na tehnični napredek, posledice za delovanje letališč in vpliv na potnike pretehtata vse druge razpoložljive možnosti, na primer: razveljavitev uredbe, pregled dejanske količine tekočin, ki je dovoljena v ročni prtljagi, sprejetje začasnih ukrepov, sorazmernih z ravnjo ogroženosti, sprejetje naključnih pregledov v zvezi s tekočinami, ki se prinesejo na krov, posebni pregledi, usmerjeni v posebne teroristične osumljence ali v posamezna letališča, letalske družbe, države članice itd.;
Asks the Commission and the Civil Aviation Security Regulatory Committee to consider, on the occasion of the review of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1546/2006 taking place every six months in the light of technical developments, the operational implications at airports and the impact on passengers of any other option available, such as: the repeal of the Regulation, the review of the actual quantity of liquids allowed in hand luggage, the adoption of temporary measures proportionate to the level of threat alert, the adoption of random checks on liquids carried on board, specific controls targeted on specific terrorist suspects, or on specific airports, airlines, Member States, etc.;
poziva Komisijo, naj v vmesnem času oceni možnost spodbujanja tretjih držav, da uvedejo uporabo zaprtih prozornih vrečk, da se tako prepreči, da bi se potnikom v tranzitu iz tretjih držav članic zaseglo predmete iz brezcarinskih trgovin; poziva Komisijo, naj začne dvostranska pogajanja z državami, v katerih je letališka varnost podobna kot v EU, da se prepreči kršitev načela svobodnega pretoka blaga, poziva Komisijo, naj se osredotoči na raziskavo in razvoj tehnologij, ki lahko odkrijejo razstrelivo;
Asks to the Commission to evaluate in the meantime the possibility of encouraging third countries to adopt tamper-evident bags in order to solve the issue of duty-free items being seized from passengers in transit from third countries; asks the Commission to enter into bilateral agreements with countries in which airport security is similar to that existing in the EU, so that free movement of goods is not violated; asks the Commission to focus on research and development of technologies that can detect explosives;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni in po potrebi oblikuje mehanizme, s katerimi bi imeli posamezniki možnost, da se na kraju samem ali pozneje pritožijo na odločitve in sankcije, ki so bile sprejete na podlagi tajnih določb priloge, ter metode za uporabo pravnih sredstev, ter te informacije razširja v javnosti in med potniki;
Asks the Commission to clarify and, if necessary, establish mechanisms for individuals to have the possibility to contest, on the spot or at a later stage, decisions and sanctions taken on the basis of the secret Annex provisions, and methods to seek legal remedy, and to circulate this information among the public and travellers;
meni, da bi bilo treba klasifikacijo „zaupno” za celotno prilogo k Uredbi (ES) št. 622/2003, pa tudi za priloge, ki jo spreminjajo, in ki se „zaradi preprečevanja nezakonitih dejanj” ne javno objavijo, nemudoma pregledati v skladu s členom 254(2) Pogodbe ES, ki določa obvezno objavo aktov EU, določb EU o preglednosti in temeljnega pravnega načela, po katerem bi morala biti zakonodaja, ki zadeva državljane, javna, tehnične zahteve pa zaupne, kadar je to potrebno za učinkovito zagotavljanje varnosti in preprečevanje nezakonitih dejanj;
Believes that the classification of the whole Annex to Regulation (EC) No 622/2003, as well as of the Annexes that modify it, as 'secret' and consequently not published 'in order to prevent acts of unlawful interference' should be urgently reviewed, in conformity with Article 254(2) of the EC Treaty providing for the compulsory publication of EU acts, of the EU provisions on transparency, as well as of the fundamental principle of law whereby legislation that affects citizens should be public, while keeping technical requirements confidential when necessary in order to effectively ensure security and avoid unlawful interference;
naroči pristojnim organom, naj to klasifikacijo uradno izpodbijajo v medinstitucionalnem odboru, ki je bil ustanovljen v skladu s členom 15(2) Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001; meni, da bi bilo treba objaviti spremembe, ki jih v prilogo uvaja uredba o omejitvah glede tekočin, saj tretjim osebam nalagajo obveznosti in naloge in jih ni mogoče obravnavati le kot tehnične ukrepe;
Instructs its competent bodies to formally contest this classification in the inter-institutional committee established pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; believes that the modifications introduced into the Annex by the Regulation on restrictions on liquids should be published, as they create obligations and duties on third persons and cannot be regarded as simple technical measures;
meni, da varnost letalstva zadeva tako promet in državljanske svoboščine kot pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter da bi morali pristojni odbori sodelovati, da bi izboljšali demokratični parlamentarni nadzor in zagotovili največjo možno preglednost;
Believes that aviation security is a matter involving both transport and civil liberties, and justice and home affairs issues, and that competent committees should work together to improve democratic parliamentary scrutiny and ensure maximum transparency;
meni, da je pomembno zagotoviti, da se ob pregledu Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002 v celoti upošteva obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 o preglednosti in dostopu do dokumentov, da se natančneje določijo pogoji, pod katerimi so podatki, povezani z varnostjo letalstva, lahko zaupni in se jih ne objavi, ter poziva Komisijo, naj jih v prilogi uporabi tako, da se zagotovi največja možna preglednost, in naj objavi pravila, ki določajo obveznosti potnikov;
Deems it important to ensure that the revision of Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002 fully takes into consideration the obligations deriving from Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on transparency and access to documents, so that it more clearly specifies under what conditions information related to aviation security can be classified and not published, and asks the Commission to apply it to the Annex in such a way as to ensure maximum transparency and to publish rules laying down duties for passengers;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba izboljšati postopek komitologije, kot se uporablja v okviru Uredbe (ES) št. 2320/2002, saj lahko Parlament preverja samo, ali je Komisija presegla svoja pooblastila v svojem predlogu, ne more pa izraziti pomislekov v zvezi z vsebino; opozarja, da bi bilo treba za zagotavljanje parlamentarnega nadzora nad zaupnimi ukrepi v okviru komitologije poiskati primerne rešitve; poudarja, da bi bilo treba v splošnem pretehtati skladnost postopka komitologije z demokratičnimi standardi;
Notes that the comitology procedure, as applied in the framework of Regulation (EC) No 2320/2002, should be improved, since Parliament can only verify whether the Commission has exceeded its powers in its proposal, while considerations related to contents cannot be raised; highlights the fact that appropriate solutions should be found to ensure parliamentary scrutiny of confidential measures in the framework of the comitology procedure; stresses that a general reflection on the conformity of the comitology procedure with democratic standards should be launched;
je seznanjen z izjavo Komisije o oblikovanju natančnih smernic za enotno uporabo omejitev glede tekočin v EU in zahteva obveščanje o tem v prihodnosti;
Notes the announcement by the Commission on the establishment of detailed guidelines for the uniform application of the restrictions on liquids in the EU, and requests further information thereon;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej oblikuje svetovalno skupino zainteresiranih strani o varnosti letalstva, da bo mogoče ustrezno upoštevati znanje in izkušnje interesnih skupin na tem področju, državljanskih pravic in pravic potrošnikov,
Calls on the Commission to formalise the Stakeholder Advisory Group on Aviation Security as soon as possible in order to take properly into account the expertise of interest groups in the field, civil rights and consumer interests,
poziva Komisijo, naj pretehta navedene zahteve za prihodnost, še posebej, kadar so v razpravi ukrepi varnosti letalstva, o katerih se trenutno razpravlja oziroma se jih preizkuša (na primer naprave za skeniranje, ki se uporabljajo na letališčih in prikazujejo ljudi gole, projekti na področju inteligentnih kamer in mikrofonov, vezje za radiofrekvenčno identifikacijo in druge tehnologije za spremljanje ljudi na letališčih in na krovu letal) in se jih nazadnje sprejme na ravni EU;
Calls on the Commission to take into consideration the abovementioned requests for the future, notably when aviation security measures currently under discussion or being tested (such as scanners used in airports and showing people naked, projects in the area of smart cameras and microphones, RFID tags, and other technologies designed to monitor people in airports and on board of airplanes) are discussed and eventually adopted at EU level;
vložen k izjavi Sveta in Komisije
to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
ki ga vlagajo Philippe Morillon, Thierry Cornillet in Marco Cappato
by Philippe Morillon, Thierry Cornillet and Marco Cappato
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o pripravi evro-sredozemske konference ministrov za zunanje zadeve v Tampereju (KOM(2006)0620),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the preparation of the Tampere Euro-Mediterranean Foreign Affairs Ministers Conference (COM(0620)2006),
ob upoštevanju sklepov osme konference ministrov za zunanje zadeve 27. in 28. novembra 2006 v Tampereju,
having regard to the conclusions of the eighth Conference of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, held in Tampere on 27-28 November 2006,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike (KOM(2006)0726),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (COM(0726)2006),
ob upoštevanju rezultatov evro-sredozemske ministrske konference o trgovini 24. maja 2006 v Marakešu,
having regard to the results of the Euro-Mediterranean Ministerial Conference on Trade held in Marrakesh on 24 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju zaključne izjave civilnega foruma, ki je potekal od 4. do 7. novembra 2006 v Marakešu,
having regard to the final declaration of the Civil Forum held in Marrakesh from 4 to 7 November 2006,
ob upoštevanju konferenc o priseljevanju, evro-afriške konference v Rabatu 10. in 11. julija 2006 in konference v Tripoliju 22. in 23. novembra 2006,
having regard to the conferences on immigration, the Euro-African conference in Rabat on 10-11 July 2006 and the conference in Tripoli on 22-23 November 2006,
ker je treba upoštevati strateški pomen sredozemskega območja in Bližnjega vzhoda za Evropsko unijo ter potrebe po solidarni sredozemski politiki, da bi se lahko soočili s številnimi skupnimi izzivi ter uresničili cilje, ki predvidevajo oblikovanje območja miru, stabilnosti in vzajemne blaginje,
having regard to the strategic importance of the Mediterranean region and the Middle East for the EU and the need for a Mediterranean policy based on solidarity to confront the numerous common challenges facing it and to achieve the objectives of establishing an area of peace, stability and shared prosperity,
ker ne more biti trajnega razvoja brez miru, stabilnosti, solidarnosti in dobrega vodenja in ker mora trajnostni razvoj predstavljati jedro evro-sredozemskega partnerstva,
whereas there can be no sustainable development without peace, stability, solidarity and good governance, and sustainable development must be at the heart of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership,
ker se je v zadnjih letih zaostril palestinsko-izraelski spopad, kar je privedlo do resnega poslabšanja humanitarnih razmer na območju Gaze in na Zahodnem bregu ter do negativnih posledic za varnost v celotni regiji,
whereas the worsening of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in recent years has led to a serious deterioration in the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, with a very negative impact on security throughout the region,