natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja dejstvo, da proračunski ukrepi niso edini dejavnik pri doseganju ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, vendar morajo prizadevanja glede proračuna dopolnjevati konkretni predlogi za poenostavitev, da bi oblikovali okolje, potrebno za doseganje naših ciljev na področju zaposlovanja, raziskav in inovacij ter okolju prijaznih in energetskih tehnologij; je prav tako prepričan, da izpolnitev ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, vključno z ustvarjanjem novih okolju prijaznih delovnih mest, ni povezana samo s povečanimi proračunskimi sredstvi, marveč tudi s kakovostno preusmeritvijo obstoječih politik EU, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko ob upoštevanju dejavnikov trajnosti;
Highlights the fact that budgetary measures are not the only factor in achieving the Europe 2020 strategy's targets, but that budgetary efforts must be supplemented by concrete proposals for simplification in order to create the environment needed in order to achieve our goals in the fields of employment, research and innovation, including green and energy technologies; is equally convinced that achieving the Europe 2020 objectives, including the creation of new green jobs, is a question not only of increased budgetary means, but also of a qualitative refocusing of existing EU policies, including the CAP, by taking due account of sustainability criteria;
prav tako meni, da je treba proračunska sredstva za leto 2012, tudi na področjih, ki niso neposredno povezana z izpolnitvijo ciljev strategije Evropa 2012, ohraniti na ustrezni ravni, da bi zagotovili neprekinjeno izvajanje politik EU in doseganje ciljev EU tudi precej po koncu sedanje gospodarske krize;
Takes the view, moreover, that 2012 budget appropriations, including in those areas not directly linked to the achievement of the Europe 2020 strategy, need to be kept at an appropriate level to ensure the continuation of EU policies and the achievement of EU objectives well beyond the duration of the current economic crisis;
poziva k večji skladnosti med zunanjo in notranjo politiko EU ob upoštevanju zelo velikega vpliva, ki ga imajo svetovni dogodki na gospodarstvo EU, naravno in industrijsko okolje, konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje; zato poudarja, da je EU treba zagotoviti potrebna finančna sredstva, da bi se lahko ustrezno odzvala na vedno večje globalne izzive ter učinkovito zagovarjala in spodbujala svoje skupne interese in glavne vrednote – na primer človekove pravice, demokracijo, pravno državo in temeljne svoboščine ter varstvo okolja; opozarja, da pogosto majhni dodatni izdatki na ravni EU lahko ustvarijo sorazmerno višje prihranke na ravni držav članic;
Calls for greater coherence between external and internal EU policies, bearing in mind the major impact of global developments on the EU's economic, natural and industrial environment, competitiveness and employment; underlines, therefore, the need to endow the EU with the necessary financial means to be able to respond adequately to growing global challenges and to defend and promote its common interests and core values – like human rights, democracy, the rule of law, fundamental freedoms and environmental protection – effectively; recalls that moderate additional expenditure at EU level can often generate proportionately higher savings at Member State level;
meni, da ima EU pomembno vlogo pri tem, da arabskim državam pomaga v tem zgodovinskem trenutku demokratičnih sprememb in gospodarske ter družbene preobrazbe in jih finančno podpre; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije Partnerstvo za demokracijo in skupno blaginjo z državami južnega Sredozemlja ( KOM(2011)0200 ));
Believes that the EU has an important role to play in assisting and financially supporting Arab countries at this historical point in their democratic development and economic and social transformation; welcomes, in this connection, the Commission communication entitled ‘A partnership for democracy and shared prosperity with the southern Mediterranean’ ( COM(2011)0200 ));
obžaluje, da prvo obdobje izvajanja evropskega semestra kljub vlogi, ki jo imajo Evropski parlament in 27 nacionalnih parlamentov v proračunskih postopkih, ni vključevalo parlamentarne razsežnosti; je kljub temu trdno prepričan, da bi večja vključenost parlamentov bistveno izboljšala demokratično naravo in preglednost izvajanja; podpira pobudo Odbora za proračun, da bi kot prvi ukrep organizirali srečanje z nacionalnimi parlamenti, na katerem bi razpravljali o splošnem pregledu proračunov držav članic in EU za leto 2012;
Deplores the absence of any parliamentary dimension to the first European Semester exercise, despite the role that the European Parliament and the 27 national parliaments play in their respective budgetary procedures; is, instead, firmly convinced that stronger parliamentary involvement would significantly improve the democratic nature and transparency of such an exercise; supports the initiative of its Committee on Budgets to organise, as a first step, a meeting with national parliaments in order to discuss the general outline of the 2012 budgets of the Member States and of the EU;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da si madžarsko in poljsko predsedstvo javno prizadevata, da bi v letu 2011 z EP vzpostavila odprt in konstruktiven dialog o proračunskih zadevah; ponovno izraža, da je pripravljen tesno sodelovati s Svetom in Komisijo, povsem v skladu z določbami Lizbonske pogodbe; pričakuje, da se bodo v proračunskem postopku za leto 2012 v celoti upoštevale sedanje smernice;
Welcomes the Hungarian and Polish presidencies' public commitments to enter into an open and constructive dialogue with the EP on budget matters in 2011; reaffirms its willingness to work in close cooperation with the Council and the Commission in full accordance with the provisions of the Lisbon Treaty; expects that the present guidelines will be taken into account fully during the 2012 budgetary procedure;
ugotavlja, da večletni finančni okvir za obdobje 2007-2013 v letu 2012 predvideva skupne odobritve za prevzem obveznosti v višini 147,55 milijarde EUR in skupno zgornjo mejo odobritev plačil v višini 141,36 milijarde EUR; opozarja, da so ti zneski v vsakem primeru precej nižji (za približno 25 milijard EUR pri odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in za približno 22 milijard EUR pri odobritvah plačil) od zgornje meje, navedene v sedanjem sklepu o lastnih sredstvih;
Notes that, for 2012, the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2007-2013 provides for an overall level of commitment appropriations (CA) of EUR 147.55 billion and an overall ceiling for payment appropriations (PA) of EUR 141.36 billion; recalls that these amounts are in any case considerably lower (by around EUR 25 billion in the case of CA, and around EUR 22 billion in the case of PA) than the ceiling specified in the current Own Resources Decision;
poudarja, da finančno programiranje, ki ga je 31. januarja 2011 predstavila Komisija, okvirno določa sredstva za prevzem obveznosti, namenjena vsakemu od obstoječih programov in ukrepov EU; je seznanjen s tem, da utegne biti kot skupna raven odobritev za prevzem obveznosti določen znesek 147,88 milijarde EUR;
Stresses that the financial programming presented by the Commission on 31 January 2011 represents an indicative reference envelope for commitment appropriations for each of the existing EU programmes and actions; takes note that the overall level of commitment appropriations may be set at EUR 147.88 billion;
poudarja, da gre pri navedenih zneskih za letno razčlenitev večletnih skupnih zneskov, o katerih sta se Parlament in Svet dogovorila ob sprejetju teh programov in ukrepov; poudarja, da so programirani letni zneski sredstva, ki omogočajo izpolnitev ciljev in prednostnih nalog EU, zlasti v okviru strategije Evropa 2020; priznava pa, da se utegne z ozirom na precej okvirne indikativne zneske (zlasti v razdelku 2), ki jih je Komisija posredovala v tem letnem obdobju, nekaj manevrskega prostora pojaviti v nekaterih razdelkih večletnega finančnega okvira;
Underlines that these figures constitute a yearly breakdown of multiannual global amounts agreed upon by both Parliament and the Council when these programmes and actions were adopted; stresses that the annual amounts programmed represent appropriations which allow for achieving EU objectives and priorities, notably in the context of Europe 2020; acknowledges, however, that some room for manoeuvre may appear under certain headings of the MFF, given the very provisional indicative figures (in particular under Heading 2) put forward by the Commission at that point in the year;
poudarja, da je proračun za leto 2012 šesti od sedmih proračunov iz trenutnega večletnega finančnega okvira; verjame, da imata obe veji proračunskega organa zdaj jasnejšo sliko o pomanjkljivostih in pozitivnih dosežkih, povezanih s tekočimi večletnimi programi; ugotavlja, da so vmesni pregledi večine programov, sprejetih s postopkom soodločanja, že bili opravljeni, in poziva Komisijo, da predstavi vse vplive na proračun, ki iz tega izhajajo; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je EP odločen – če se to izkaže za potrebno, da bi podprli in okrepili politične prednostne naloge EU ter obravnavali nove politične potrebe in v tesnem sodelovanju s specializiranimi odbori – med drugim v celoti izkoristiti točko 37 medinstitucionalnega sporazuma (ki omogoča zakonodajno prožnost do višine 5 %);
Points out that the 2012 budget is the sixth of seven under the current MFF; believes that the two arms of the budgetary authority now have, therefore, a clearer view of the shortfalls and positive developments associated with existing multiannual programmes; notes that the mid-term reviews of most co-decided programmes have already taken place, and calls on the Commission to present any budgetary implications resulting from this exercise; emphasises, in this connection, that the EP is determined – should it prove necessary in order to support and enhance EU political priorities as well as to address new political needs and in close cooperation with its specialised committees – to make full use of, inter alia, Point 37 of the IIA (allowing a 5% margin of legislative flexibility);
poudarja dejstvo, da zagotavljanje zadostne razlike do zgornje meje vseh razdelkov večletnega finančnega okvira ni edina rešitev za obravnavo nepredvidenih okoliščin; izpostavlja ponavljajoče se primere nezadostnega financiranja nekaterih razdelkov večletnega finančnega okvira, zlasti razdelkov 1a, 3b in 4, glede na potrebe in politične prednostne naloge EU, ki jih podpirajo države članice; meni, da pristop, na katerem temeljijo proračunske smernice Sveta za leto 2012, ne odraža dolgoročne perspektive in bi lahko ob nepredvidenih dogodkih ali novih političnih prednostnih nalogah ogrozil tekoče ukrepe in programe; poudarja, da nedavni dogodki v severnoafriških državah že kažejo na to, in poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, kako bi lahko z obstoječimi finančnimi instrumenti EU podprli prizadevanja za demokracijo;
Highlights the fact that leaving sufficient margins below all MFF headings is not the only solution in order to address unforeseen circumstances; points out the recurrent under-financing of certain headings of the MFF, in particular Headings 1a, 3b and 4, as compared to the needs and EU political priorities endorsed by the Member States; finds that the approach underpinning the Council's budget guidelines for 2012 does not reflect a long-term perspective and could put existing actions and programmes at risk, should unforeseen events or new political priorities arise; stresses that recent events in several North African countries are already pointing in that direction, and invites the Commission to asses how the EU's existing financial instruments could be used to support aspirations to democracy;
po drugi strani pa verjame, da so razni mehanizmi prilagodljivosti, ki jih predvideva medinstitucionalni sporazum (na primer prerazporeditev odhodkov med razdelki ali uporaba instrumenta prilagodljivosti), orodja, ki jih je treba v celoti izkoristiti; opozarja, da jih je bilo treba od leta 2007 vsako leto uporabiti kot odgovor na različne izzive, ki so se pojavili; pričakuje popolno sodelovanje Sveta pri njihovi uporabi in pravočasen začetek razprav, da bi se izognili nesorazmerno dolgim in težavnim pogajanjem glede njihove uporabe;
Believes, on the contrary, that the various flexibility mechanisms foreseen by the IIA (such as shifting expenditure between headings or mobilising the flexibility instrument) are tools to be used fully; recalls that they have had to be used every year since 2007 in response to various challenges that have arisen; expects the Council's to give its full cooperation in using them, and to enter into such discussions at an early stage in order to avoid disproportionately long and difficult negotiations on their mobilisation;
v zvezi s tem poudarja, da ohranitev odobritev za prevzem obveznosti pod strogim nadzorom ne bi zahtevala samo precejšnje prerazporeditve sredstev in prednostnih nalog, ampak bi morale institucije skupaj opredeliti tudi morebitne negativne prednostne naloge in prihranke; odločno poziva svoje specializirane odbore, da se resno vključijo v postopek opredeljevanja jasnih političnih prednostnih nalog na vseh področjih politike EU; vendar v zvezi s tem opozarja na dejstvo, da je za sposobnost delovanja Unije potrebna večja proračunska prožnost in po potrebi tudi spremembe večletnega finančnega okvira (na primer izravnave med razdelki sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira), ne le za soočanje z novimi izzivi, ampak tudi za lažji postopek sprejemanja odločitev v institucijah, da bi uskladili proračunska sredstva z okoliščinami in prednostnimi nalogami, ki se pojavljajo; poudarja, da mora biti ta proces popolnoma pregleden;
Stresses, in this connection, that keeping commitment appropriations under strict control would require not only significant redeployments and reprioritisation, but also the joint identification of possible negative priorities and savings by the institutions; strongly urges its specialised committees seriously to embark on the process of determining clear political priorities in all EU policy fields; highlights, however, the fact that, to this end, greater budgetary flexibility is needed, and that a revision of the MFF (for example, offsetting between headings of the current MFF) may be a necessity for the Union's ability to function, not only in terms of facing the new challenges but also with a view to facilitating the decision-making process within the institutions in order to align budgetary resources with evolving circumstances and priorities; emphasises that this process must be fully transparent;
poudarja, da bi morala okrepitev številnih politik in določitev novih pristojnosti na ravni EU po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe logično pomeniti dodatno finančno sposobnost EU, česar v letu 2011, prvem letu po začetku veljavnosti, skoraj ni bilo zaslediti; spominja Svet in Komisijo na politično izjavo, priloženo proračunu za leto 2011, v kateri se Komisija obvezuje, da bo preučila načine za okrepitev prednostih področij Lizbonske pogodbe in natančno ocenila potrebe pri pripravi predloga proračuna za leto 2012; pričakuje, da bo Komisija sledila zgledu in na primer predlagala, da se uspešni pilotni projekti ali pripravljalni ukrepi, povezani z Lizbonsko pogodbo, preoblikujejo v večletne programe;
Emphasises that the strengthening of a number of policies and the new competences established at EU level following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty should logically imply additional financial capacity for the EU, which was hardly the case for 2011, the first year after its entry into force; reminds the Council and the Commission of the political declaration annexed to the 2011 budget, whereby the Commission undertakes to consider ways to strengthen the Lisbon Treaty priority areas and thoroughly to assess the needs when preparing the draft budget for 2012; expects the Commission to follow suit by, for example, proposing to turn successful Lisbon-related pilot projects or preparatory actions into multiannual programmes;
meni, da je pristop Komisije k določanju subvencij iz proračuna EU, namenjenih decentraliziranim agencijam EU, zanesljiv in da zagotavlja prave spodbude; poudarja, da je agencijam EU dodeljen proračun, ki še zdaleč ni omejen zgolj na upravne odhodke, temveč prispeva k izpolnjevanju ciljev Evropa 2020 in splošnih ciljev EU, kot so jih opredelili zakonodajni organi; potrjuje potrebo po pozorni preučitvi zahtev za nova delovna mesta, povezanih z na novo dodeljenimi nalogami; vendar poudarja, da je pomembno agencijam, ki so dobile dodatne naloge, zagotoviti ustrezna finančna sredstva, da ne bi ovirali njihovega delovanja; zahteva, da se v zvezi z zaposlovanjem strokovnega znanstvenega osebja z delovnimi izkušnjami uporabi poseben pristop, zlasti kadar se ta delovna mesta financirajo izključno s honorarji, zaradi česar ne vplivajo na proračun EU; podpira delo, ki ga je na področju prihodnosti agencij opravila medinstitucionalna delovna skupina, vzpostavljena v začetku leta 2009, in se veseli njenih zaključkov, zlasti v zvezi z zgoraj navedenimi točkami;
Considers the Commission's approach to determining EU decentralised agencies' subsidies from the EU budget to be reliable and to provide the right incentives; stresses that EU agencies' budget allocations are far from being confined to administrative expenditure alone, but instead contribute to achieving the Europe 2020 goals and EU objectives in general, as decided by the legislative authority; reaffirms the need to examine requests for new posts carefully in relation to newly assigned tasks; underlines, however, the importance of adequate funding for those agencies whose tasks have been increased, so as not to hinder their performance; calls for a specific approach in respect of the recruitment of specialised scientific staff with professional experience, especially when these posts are financed exclusively by fees and are thus budget-neutral for the EU budget; supports the work carried out by the interinstitutional working group on the future of agencies, which was set up in early 2009, and looks forward to its conclusions, notably on the above mentioned points;
ugotavlja, da bo raven plačil za leto 2012 neposredna posledica pravnih in političnih obveznosti iz prejšnjih let; meni, da je povečanje v primerjavi z ravnjo proračuna za letu 2011 predvidljivo in v skladu s splošnim profilom plačil v programskem obdobju 2007-2013 (glej preglednice v prilogi);
Notes that the 2012 level of payments will result directly from previous years' legal and political commitments; believes that an increase compared to the 2011 budget level is foreseeable and in line with the general profile of payments over the 2007-2013 programming period (see tables in annex);
poudarja, da se pri izvajanju večletnih programov ni mogoče izogniti določeni stopnji neporavnanih obveznosti in da neporavnane obveznosti že po definiciji pomenijo, da je treba izvršiti ustrezna plačila; zato zahteva, da se ohrani urejeno razmerje med obveznostmi in plačili, v teku celotnega proračunskega postopka pa bo storil vse, kar je v njegovi moči, da bi zmanjšal razkorak med odobritvami za prevzem obveznosti in odobritvami plačil;
Emphasises that a certain level of RAL is unavoidable when multiannual programmes are implemented, and that the existence of outstanding commitments by definition requires corresponding payments to be made; requests, therefore, that an orderly relationship between commitments and payments be maintained, and will do its utmost throughout the budgetary procedure to reduce the discrepancy between commitment and payment appropriations;
se strinja s stališčem Sveta, da je treba spodbujati realno pripravo proračuna; poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za to, da bo njen predlog proračuna temeljil na tem načelu; ugotavlja pa, da izvajanje v preteklosti, ki se je zadnja leta sicer izboljšalo, v nekaterih primerih ni nujno zelo natančen pokazatelj potreb za leto 2012, saj bi se izvajanje nekaterih programov v letu 2012 lahko pospešilo, potrebe po plačilih pa temu ustrezno povečale; podpira zahtevo Sveta, da morajo države članice posredovati natančnejše napovedi o izvajanju, s čimer bi se izognili predvsem prenizki stopnji izvajanja, in meni, da morajo večino prizadevanj v zvezi s tem prevzeti države članice same, saj se raven v predlogu proračuna Komisije določa predvsem na podlagi njihovih napovedi (zlasti v razdelku 2) in izvedbenih zmogljivosti; opozarja, da države članice skupaj s Komisijo upravljajo več kot 80 % sredstev EU; spominja države članice na njihovo zakonsko odgovornost opredeljevanja in izvajanja finančnih pravil, ki veljajo za prejemnike sredstev EU;
Shares the Council's view that realistic budgeting should be promoted; calls on the Commission to ensure that its draft budget is based on this principle; notes, however, that past implementation, which has improved in recent years, may not constitute a very accurate indicator of 2012 needs in some cases, since the implementation of some programmes could speed up in 2012, and payment needs increase accordingly; endorses the Council's call for the Member States to provide better implementation forecasts, notably with a view to avoiding under-implementation, and takes the view that the bulk of the effort in this respect should be undertaken by the Member States themselves, since the level of the Commission's draft budget is determined mainly by their own forecasts (particularly under Heading 2) and their implementation capacity; recalls that the Member States co-manage, together with the Commission, more than 80% of EU funding; reminds the Member States of their legal responsibility in defining and enforcing financial rules applicable to the recipients of EU funding;
opozarja, da je varstvo finančnih interesov od začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe tudi v pristojnosti držav članic; opozarja na ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da v nekaterih državah članicah sistemi upravljanja in nadzora niso popolnoma učinkoviti; poleg tega spominja, da napačno porabljena strukturna sredstva v višini več milijard evrov še niso bila izterjana; ugotavlja, da tekoče letno poročilo GD REGIO ne more potrditi zakonitosti in pravilnosti izdatkov držav članic, ker nekatere države članice niso izpolnile svoje obveznosti pravočasne predložitve poročila; poudarja, da bo Parlament glede na to, da države članice v proračun EU ne prispevajo dovolj sredstev, morda primoran med projekti EU opredeliti negativne prednostne naloge in posledično skrčiti proračun zanje;
Points out that, since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the protection of financial interests has also been the responsibility of the Member States; emphasises the European Court of Auditors' finding that the management and control systems in some of the Member States are not fully effective; recalls furthermore, that wrongly spent structural funding amounting to billions of euros has not yet been recovered; notes that DG REGIO's current annual report cannot declare the legality and regularity of the Member States' expenditure, because some Member States have not complied with their obligation to submit their reports on time; points out that, as a result of the Member States' ongoing under-financing of the EU budget, Parliament may be forced to identify negative priorities among EU projects, and subsequently to cut their budgets;