natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
8. poudarja, da je Sodišče v zadevi Švedska proti Komisiji (zadeva C-64/05 P)
Recalls that the Court of Justice clarified in the case Sweden v Commission (case C-64/05 P)
Sodba z dne 18. decembra 2007 v zadevi C-64/05 P, Švedska proti Komisiji , ZOdl.
Judgment of 18 December 2007 in case C-64/05 P, Sweden v Commission , ECR 2007 p.
Sodba z dne 13. januarja 2011 v zadevi T-362/08, IFAW proti Komisiji , še ni objavljena v ZOdl. ;
Judgment of 13 January 2011 in case T-362/08, IFAW v Commission , not yet published in the ECR. ;
Turco , odstavek 46. ; zato poudarja da morajo biti vse izjeme, povezane z zakonodajnim postopkom, vključno s pravnimi nasveti in t. i. prostorom za razmislek, zelo natančno opredeljene
46. ; stresses therefore that any exceptions referring to the legislative procedure, including legal advice, should be precisely limited and the so-called ‘space to think’ narrowly defined
V sodbi Access Info (T-233/09) je Splošno sodišče ponovno zatrdilo (odstavek 69): „Namreč, da bi državljani lahko uresničevali demokratične pravice, morajo imeti možnost, da lahko podrobno spremljajo postopek odločanja znotraj institucij, ki sodelujejo v zakonodajnem postopku, in da imajo dostop do vseh upoštevnih informacij.“ o zavrnitvi Sveta, da bi razkril stališča držav članic o predlagani prenovitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, ter v zadevi ClientEarth proti Svetu
Emphasises that, regardless of this clear principle, this is still not implemented in practice, as shown by the recent judgment in the Access Info Europe
ClientEarth proti Svetu , zadeva št.
In its Access Info judgment (T-233/09) the General Court reaffirmed that (para.
T-452/10. o pravnem mnenju glede prenovitve Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki je v obravnavi na Splošnem sodišču; ugotavlja, da javno razkritje stališč držav članic med pogajanji o Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001 in številnih nadaljnjih sprejetih ukrepih nikakor ni ogrozilo zmožnosti odločanja Sveta, saj ta razkritja niso onemogočila uspešnega zaključka zadevnih zakonodajnih postopkov;
ClientEarth v Council , case T-452/10. , pending before the General Court, on a legal opinion regarding the recast of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; notes that the public disclosure of Member States’ positions during the negotiation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and many subsequent adopted measures did not in any way undermine the decision-making capacity of the Council, since these disclosures did not prevent the successful conclusion of the relevant legislative procedures;
18. poziva Komisijo, naj da javnosti na voljo dnevne rede, zapisnike in izjave o interesu strokovnih skupin, pa tudi imena članov, zapisnike in glasovanja komitoloških odborov ter vse dokumente, ki so jih te skupine in odbori obravnavali, vključno z osnutki delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov; poziva Parlament, naj sprejme preglednejše in bolj odprte postopke za obravnavanje teh dokumentov, tudi pri notranjem delu;
Calls on the Commission to make publicly available agendas, minutes and declarations of interest relating to expert groups, and names of members, proceedings and votes of the ‘comitology’ committees, as well as all of the documents considered by such groups and committees, including draft delegated acts and draft implementing acts; calls on the Parliament to adopt a more transparent and open procedure, including internally, to deal with these documents;
20. obžaluje, da nedavna pogajanja med institucijami EU o skupnem dogovoru o delegiranih aktih in o okvirnem sporazumu med Komisijo in Parlamentom niso bila v celoti pregledna; se zavezuje, da bodo potekajoča ali prihodnja pogajanja s Svetom in Komisijo o medinstitucionalnih in podobnih sporazumih povsem pregledna;
Regrets that recent negotiations between the EU institutions for a ‘common understanding’ on delegated acts and for a new framework agreement between the Commission and the Parliament have not been fully transparent; commits itself to making fully transparent its negotiations with the Council and Commission on ongoing or future interinstitutional agreements or comparable agreements;
Pritožba št. 2493/2008/(BB)TS. in poročil o kliničnih študijah
Complaint 2493/2008/(BB)TS. and clinical study reports
23. poudarja, da se sicer člen 15 PEU le v posebnih primerih uporablja za upravne dokumente Sodišča, vendar mora Sodišče v skladu s členom 1 PEU tako kot vse druge institucije, organi, uradi in agencije EU svoje delo opravljati „čim bolj javno“; zato poziva Sodišče, naj preuči možnosti za izboljšanje preglednosti svojih pravosodnih dejavnosti, saj ni pomembno samo, da se zadosti pravici, ampak je treba to narediti javno
Emphasises that while Article 15 TEU only specifically applies to the administrative documents of the Court, the Court of Justice, like all other EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, must carry out its work ‘as openly as possible’, pursuant to Article 1 TEU; to this end, invites the Court to explore ways to increase the transparency of ìts judicial activities, ‘as not only must justice be done; it must also be seen to be done‘
24. ponovno poudarja pomen načela sledljivosti, ki državljanom omogoča, da vedo, kako in s kakšnimi rezultati se javni denar dodeljuje in porablja, ter poziva institucije EU, naj na vseh ravneh uporabljajo to načelo pri vodenju institucij in politik ter pri sredstvih, dodeljenih njihovemu izvajanju;
Reiterates the importance of the principle of traceability, so to ensure that citizens can know how public money is allocated and spent, and with what results, and calls on the EU institutions to apply this principle in relation to the running of the institution and to policies and the funds allocated to implement them, at all levels;
26. v skladu z najboljšimi mednarodnimi standardi, ki so jih razvile nevladne organizacije
In accordance with the best international standards developed by major non-governmental organisations
27. opozarja, da Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 jasno zavezuje institucije k zagotavljanju dostopa do vseh tistih delov dokumentov, za katere ne velja nobena izjema; ugotavlja, da je zagotovljen delni dostop pogosto neupravičeno omejen, in poudarja, da bi bilo treba dejansko upoštevati tudi dostop do tistih vsebinskih delov dokumentov, ki so pomembni za prosilca;
Recalls that Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 establishes a clear obligation for the institutions to grant access to all those parts of the document that are not covered by any of the exceptions; notes that the partial access granted is often unduly limited, and stresses that access should be given genuine consideration in relation also to those substantive parts of documents that are of interest to the applicant;
Varstvo podatkov in preglednost
Data protection and transparency
Uredba Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 45/2001 z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 8, z dne 12.1.2001, str.
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
31. pozdravlja soglasje, ki sta ga evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov in evropski varuh človekovih pravic dosegla glede ustreznega ravnotežja med varstvom podatkov in preglednostjo, zlasti glede proaktivnega pristopa, ki pomeni, da institucije presodijo in nato posameznikom, na katere se podatki nanašajo, jasno povedo – pred ali vsaj med zbiranjem podatkov – kolikšna je verjetnost, da bodo v okviru obdelave ti podatki javno razkriti
Welcomes the consensus reached by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) and the European Ombudsman on the appropriate balance between data protection and transparency, especially as regards the proactive approach meaning that ‘institutions assess and subsequently make clear to data subjects – before or at least at the moment they collect their data – the extent to which the processing of such data includes or might include its public disclosure’
Aarhuška konvencija
Aarhus Convention
33. poziva vse institucije, organe, urade in agencije EU, naj Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001 izvajajo skladno z določbami Aarhuške konvencije; glede tega poziva Komisijo, naj objavi študijo o preverjanju skladnosti prenosa okoljskih direktiv EU
Calls on all EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies to apply Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in a way coherent with the provisions of the Aarhus Convention; calls in that regard on the Commission to make public the conformity-checking studies regarding transposition of EU environmental directives
UL L 396, 30.12.06, str.
OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p.
1. v zvezi z elektronskim dostopom javnosti, naj sprejme samo tiste zahteve za ohranjanje zaupnosti, ki so jasno upravičene kot veljavne na podlagi člena 119(2) uredbe REACH, ter naj informacije, za katere običajno velja, da spodkopavajo zaščito komercialnih interesov v skladu s členom 118(2) uredbe REACH, razlaga strogo in ne glede na obveznosti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št. 1049/2001, da je treba za vsak primer posebej pretehtati, ali javni interes prevladuje nad potrebo po ohranjanju zaupnosti;
1. with regard to electronic public access, to only accept confidentiality claims that are clearly justified as valid under Article 119(2) of REACH, and to interpret the information that is normally deemed to undermine the protection of commercial interests pursuant to Article 118(2) of REACH strictly and without prejudice to its obligation pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 to balance any granting of confidentiality against a possible overriding public interest on a case-by-case basis;
Dobro upravljanje
Good governance
37. poudarja sedanje pomanjkanje usklajene upravne zakonodaje za institucije, organe, urade in agencije EU, na primer pravil glede izdajanja upravnih odločb, proti katerim je možna pritožba
Emphasises the current lack of coherent administrative law for EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, such as rules regarding the delivery of administrative decisions that can be appealed against
Zadeva Access Info (T-233/09) je razkrila prakso pošiljanja potrdilnih odločb z nepriporočeno, običajno pošto, čeprav je dokaz o datumu prejema bistven za oceno o spoštovanju rokov za uveljavljanje nadaljnjih pravnih sredstev (na sodišču).
The Access Info case (T-233/09) has revealed that there is a practice of sending confirmatory decisions by unregistered, normal mail, although the proof of date of receipt is essential to evaluate respect for deadlines for seeking further legal (court) remedies.
38. poudarja, da Uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 določa stroge roke za obravnavo zahtev za dostop do dokumentov
Stresses that Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 lays down strict deadlines for handling requests for access to documents
39. opozarja, da so v številnih primerih velike zamude privedle do začetka postopkov pred Sodiščem, utemeljenih na pomanjkanju odziva, ki jim je sledil pozen odziv Komisije, zaradi česar je postal sodni primer neveljaven, zadevni posameznik pa je moral postopek začeti na novo
Points out that in several cases extensive delays have led to proceedings being started before the Court of Justice based on a lack of response, followed by a late Commission response, making the court case void and forcing the individual concerned to start the whole procedure once again
Glej na primer Ryanair Ltd. proti Komisiji (združene zadeve T-494/08, T-500/08 in T-509/08), ter Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory proti Komisiji (zadeva T-395/10). ; poziva Komisijo, naj dosledno spoštuje roke, določene v Uredbi (ES) št. 1049/2001; predlaga uvedbo ukrepov, na primer obveznosti objave dokumentov, če so ti roki kršeni;
See, for example, Ryanair Ltd. v Commission (joined cases T-494/08 to T-500/08 and T-509/08), and Stichting Corporate Europe Observatory v Commission (case T-395/10). ; calls on the Commission to fully respect the deadlines set in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; suggests introducing consequences, such as the obligation to publish the documents, if the deadlines are not respected;
43. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi preglednost pri upravljanju evropskih sredstev, in sicer z objavo istih kategorij informacij o vseh prejemnikih teh sredstev na enem spletnem mestu in v enem od delovnih jezikov EU;
Calls upon the Commission to ensure transparency in the administration of European funds by publication of the same categories of information on a single website, in one of the EU working languages, regarding all beneficiaries of those funds;
Poslovnik Parlamenta ( P6_TA(2009)0359 ) na primer od leta 2009 ne vsebuje več seznama dokumentov Parlamenta, ki so neposredno dostopni javnosti, namesto tega poslovnik pristojnost za oblikovanje takega seznama podeljuje predsedstvu (člen 104(3)). in kvestorjev), pa tudi dejavnosti poslancev EP, na primer njihovo delovanje pri parlamentarnem delu in prisotnosti na sejah pod pogoji, ki jih je v svoji resoluciji z dne 14. januarja 2009 zahteval Parlament; meni, da je treba vprašanje nadomestil in stroškov poslancev EP obravnavati pregledno, hkrati pa v celoti spoštovati pravila o varstvu podatkov;
For example, since 2009 Parliament’s Rules of Procedure ( P6_TA(2009)0359 ) have no longer included a list of EP documents directly accessible to the public but now give the Bureau the prerogative to establish such a list (Rule 104(3)). and the Quaestors) and to MEPs’ activities, such as participation in parliamentary work and parliamentary attendance, under the terms requested by Parliament in its resolution of 14 January 2009; considers that the question of MEPs’ allowances should be dealt with in a transparent way, while fully respecting personal data protection rules;
48. poudarja, da oblasti držav članic na splošno ne upoštevajo pravice državljanov do dostopa do informacij, in zato poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju načela dobrega upravljanja preuči določbe držav članic o dostopu do dokumentov in jih podpira pri pripravljanju čim bolj preglednih predpisov, ki spodbujajo dostop državljanov do dokumentov;
Stresses that citizens’ right to information is generally not complied with by the Member States’ authorities and therefore calls on the Commission – taking into account the principle of good governance – to study the Member States’ provisions on access to documents and to encourage them to draw up maximally transparent rules promoting citizens’ access to documents;
50. poziva Svet in Komisijo k pogajanju s Parlamentom, da bi spremenili skupno izjavo o postopku soodločanja in medinstitucionalni sporazum o boljši pripravi zakonodaje; se zavezuje, da bo medtem spremenil svoj poslovnik, vključno s priloženim kodeksom ravnanja pri pogajanjih glede soodločanja, da bi ta načela postala v celoti zavezujoča;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to negotiate with Parliament on amending the joint declaration on the codecision procedure and the interinstitutional agreement on better law-making to this end; commits itself, in the interim, to amending its rules of procedure, including the annexed code of conduct on codecision negotiations, to give full binding effect to these principles;
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Alexander Alvaro, Mario Borghezio, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Alexander Alvaro, Mario Borghezio, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Stanimir Ilčev (Stanimir Ilchev), Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Norica Nicolai, Hubert Pirker, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Stanimir Ilchev, Mariya Nedelcheva, Norica Nicolai, Hubert Pirker, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (EU) št. 648/2004 v zvezi z uporabo fosfatov in drugih fosfornih spojin v detergentih za pranje perila v gospodinjstvu
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 648/2004 as regards the use of phosphates and other phosphorus compounds in household laundry detergents
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0597 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0597 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 114 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7-0356/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0356/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 4. novembra 2010
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 04 November 2010
UL C …, …, str. …. ,
OJ C ..., ..., p. .... ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov ( A6-0246/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A7-0246/2011 ),
(1) Komisija je v skladu s členom 16 Uredbe (ES) št. 648/2004 v Poročilu o uporabi fosfatov Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu ocenila uporabo fosfatov v detergentih 6 .
(1) Pursuant to Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 648/2004, the Commission has evaluated the use of phosphates in detergents in the Report to the Council and the European Parliament concerning the use of phosphates 6 .
Po nadaljnjih analizah je Komisija menila, da je treba uporabo fosfatov v detergentih za pranje perila v gospodinjstvu omejiti in tako zmanjšati vpliv fosfatov iz detergentov na tveganje evtrofikacije in znižati stroške odstranjevanja fosfatov v čistilnih napravah za odpadne vode.
Following further analysis, the Commission has concluded that the use of phosphates in household laundry detergents should be limited in order to reduce the contribution of phosphates from detergents to eutrophication risks and to reduce the costs of phosphates removal in waste water treatment plants.
Tako zmanjšanje stroškov odtehta stroške reformulacije detergentov za pranje perila v gospodinjstvu z nadomestili za fosfate.
Those cost savings outweigh the cost of reformulating household laundry detergents with alternatives to phosphates.
Vseeno pa je pomembno uporabljati in sprejemati tehnologije in sorodno opremo za pridobivanje fosforja, da bi se spoprijeli s problemom pomanjkanja tega elementa.
However, it is critical to implement the adoption of technologies and related equipment to recover phosphorous in order to address the problem of the scarcity of that element.
(2) Učinkoviti nadomestki za detergente za pranje perila v gospodinjstvu na podlagi fosfatov vsebujejo le majhne količine drugih fosforjevih spojin, in sicer fosfonate, ki lahko v večjih količinah prav tako pomenijo skrb za okolje.
(2) Efficient alternatives to phosphates-based household laundry detergents require small amounts of other phosphorus compounds, namely phosphonates which if used in increasing quantities might be of concern for the environment.
(2) Učinkoviti nadomestki za detergente v gospodinjstvu na podlagi fosfatov trenutno vsebujejo le majhne količine drugih fosforjevih spojin, in sicer fosfonate, ali druge sestavine (co-builders), kot so polikarboksilati .
(2) Efficient alternatives to phosphates-based household detergents currently require small amounts of other phosphorus compounds, namely phosphonates , or other co-builders such as polycarboxylates.
Te snovi niso enostavno biorazgradljive.
Those substances are not readily biodegradable.
V svojem mnenju z dne 29. maja 2007 z naslovom Površinsko neaktivne organske sestavine in detergenti na osnovi zeolita (Non surfactant Organic Ingredients and Zeolite-based Detergents) je znanstveni odbor za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja ugotovil, da razpoložljive informacije ne zadostujejo za izključitev morebitnega tveganja zaradi teh snovi, in priporočil, naj se zagotovijo dodatne informacije za temeljitejšo in popolnejšo oceno tveganja.
In its opinion of 29 May 2007 entitled "Non surfactant Organic Ingredients and Zeolite-based Detergents", the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks found that the available information is not sufficient to exclude a potential risk due to those substances and recommended that additional information be provided for a more thorough and complete risk assessment.
Uporaba teh snovi v večjih količinah zaradi omejitve uporabe fosfatov lahko ogrozi okolje.
If those substances were used in increasing quantities as a result of the limitation on the use of phosphates, this might be of concern for the environment.
Uporaba drugih sestavin zaenkrat velja za gospodinjske detergente za pranje perila, pa tudi za strojno pranje posode.
The use of other co-builders currently applies not only to household laundry detergents, but also to household automatic dishwashing detergents.
Omeniti je treba ugotovitve znanstvenega odbora Evropske komisije, da utegnejo te snovi povzročiti okoljske težave, in priporočilo, da je treba zagotoviti dodatne informacije o tem.
It is important to refer to the findings of the relevant scientific committee of the European Commission that there may well be environmental problems with these co-builders and their resulting recommendation that additional information should be provided.
(4) Ker države članice na morejo doseči ciljev načrtovanih ukrepov v zadostni meri, in sicer zmanjšanje vpliva fosfatov iz detergentov na tveganje evtrofikacije in znižanje stroškov odstranjevanja fosfatov v čistilnih napravah iz odpadne vode, saj nacionalni ukrepi z različnimi tehničnimi specifikacijami ne morejo vplivati na kakovost vode, ki prehaja državne meje in jih je zato lažje doseči na ravni Unije, lahko Evropska unija sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti po členu 5 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
(4) Since the objectives of the action to be taken, namely to reduce the contribution of phosphates from detergents to eutrophication risks and to reduce the costs of phosphates removal in waste water treatment plants, cannot be sufficiently achieved by Member States as national measures with different technical specifications cannot influence the quality of water crossing national borders, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union.