natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je bistveno, da institucije in organi EU v celoti izkoristijo potrebna sredstva za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in celovite odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies make full use of the necessary resources in order to fulfil their obligation to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
ker kljub temu, da je preteklo že sedem let od sprejetja prej omenjene resolucije Parlamenta z dne 6. septembra 2001, s katero je bil potrjen kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je pripravil varuh človekovih pravic, druge glavne institucije še vedno niso upoštevale nujnega poziva Parlamenta, naj delujejo v skladu z določbami tega kodeksa,
whereas, although seven years have passed since the adoption of Parliament's above-mentioned resolution of 6 September 2001 approving the Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, the other main institutions have not yet complied with Parliament's urgent request that they bring their practice into line with the provisions of that code,
ker je bilo leta 2007 prejetih približno 16 % manj pritožb kot leta 2006, medtem ko se je število dopustnih pritožb povečalo tako absolutno kot relativno, in sicer s 449 (12 % skupnega števila) v letu 2006 na 518 (16 % skupnega števila) v letu 2007,
whereas about 16% fewer complaints were received in 2007 than in 2006 but the number of admissible complaints increased in both absolute and relative terms from 449 (12% of the total) to 518 (16% of the total) in 2007,
ker rezultati 348 opravljenih preiskav, od katerih jih je bilo 341 povezanih s pritožbami, sedem pa jih je bilo opravljenih na pobudo varuha človekovih pravic, kažejo, da v 95 primerih (kar je 25,7 % obravnavanih pritožb) niso bile ugotovljene nepravilnosti,
whereas the findings of the 348 completed inquiries, of which 341 were linked to complaints and 7 were own-initiative investigations, show that in 95 cases (corresponding to 25.7% of the complaints investigated) no maladministration could be ascertained,
ker se je leta 2007 podvojilo število primerov, ko so institucije ali organi na podlagi pritožbe varuhu človekovih pravic sami odpravili nepravilnosti (129 zadev), kar kaže na njihovo vedno večjo pripravljenost, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelovanje z varuhom človekovih pravic v korist državljanov,
whereas the year 2007 saw a doubling of the number of cases of maladministration settled by the institution or body itself following a complaint to the Ombudsman (129 cases), which reflects a growing willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to put right mistakes that have occurred and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens,
ker je bilo leta 2007 pet primerov sporazumno rešenih in ker je bilo konec leta 2007 v obravnavi še 31 predlogov za sporazumno rešitev,
whereas 5 cases were closed in 2007 after an amicable resolution had been achieved, and at the end of 2007 31 proposals for amicable resolutions were still under consideration,
ker je leta 2007 varuh človekovih pravic zaključil 55 preiskav s kritično oceno in ker ta pritožniku potrdi, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje,
whereas in 2007 the Ombudsman closed 55 inquiries with critical remarks and whereas a critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future,
ker je bilo leta 2007 podanih osem osnutkov priporočil, za sedem osnutkov priporočil iz leta 2006 je bil sprejet sklep, enkrat pa je bilo Parlamentu predloženo posebno poročilo,
whereas eight draft recommendations were made in 2007, seven draft recommendations from 2006 led to a decision in 2007 and one case led to a special report to the European Parliament,
ker kritične ocene v odločbah, s katerimi se zaključijo nerazrešljivi primeri nepravilnosti, niti priporočila ali posebna poročila varuha človekovih pravic niso zavezujoči, saj mu njegova pooblastila ne omogočajo, da bi neposredno rešil tovrstne primere, temveč so mu podeljena za spodbujanje samoregulacije v institucijah in organih Evropske unije,
whereas neither the critical remarks contained in decisions closing irremediable cases of maladministration, nor recommendations or special reports by the Ombudsman, have binding effect, as his powers do not extend to directly remedying instances of maladministration but are intended to encourage self-regulation on the part of the European Union's institutions and bodies,
ker je bilo opredeljeno, da gre za nepravilnosti pri upravljanju takrat, kadar zadevna institucija ali drug organ ne spoštuje zanj zavezujočih pravil ali načel, vključno s primeri, ko ta izhajajo iz zaveze institucije ali organa samega in tega Pogodbe ali sekundarna zakonodaja ne zahtevajo neposredno;
whereas maladministration has been defined as a failure by the institution or other body concerned to comply with rules or principles which are binding upon it, including when these result from a commitment on the part of the institution or body itself which is not directly required by the Treaties or by secondary legislation,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic kot prednostno nalogo določil potrebo po podpiranju dobrega upravljanja v institucijah in organih Evropske unije ter spodbujanje prizadevanj, ki presegajo zgolj izogibanje nezakonitemu ravnanju v zvezi s tem;
whereas the Ombudsman has set as a priority the need to promote good administration in the EU institutions and bodies and to encourage efforts in this respect which go beyond merely avoiding unlawful behaviour,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2007 Parlamentu predložil eno posebno poročilo in ker je predložitev posebnega poročila Parlamentu pomembno sredstvo, s katerim varuh človekovih pravic pri nekaterih peticijah zaprosi za politično podporo Parlamenta in Odbora za peticije, kadar gre za urejanje zadev državljanov, katerih pravice so bile kršene, in izboljšanje upravnih standardov EU,
whereas the Ombudsman submitted one special report to the European Parliament in 2007 and whereas submitting a special report to Parliament represents a valuable means by which the Ombudsman can seek the political support of Parliament and its Committee on Petitions in order to bring satisfaction to citizens whose rights have been infringed, as well as promoting the improvement of standards of EU administration,
ker ima Parlament od začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe iz Nice enake pravice kot države članice, Svet in Komisija, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču Evropske unije zaradi nepristojnosti, bistvene kršitve postopka, kršitve Pogodbe ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila, ki se nanaša na njeno uporabo, ali zaradi zlorabe pooblastil,
whereas, since the entry into force of the Treaty of Nice, Parliament has enjoyed the same right as the Member States, the Council and the Commission to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Union on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers,
ker lahko institucije in drugi organi EU na podlagi kritičnih pripomb glede slabega upravljanja, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic navedel v svojem poročilu za leto 2007 (kritične ocene, osnutki priporočil in posebno poročilo), izvajajo ustrezne ukrepe, da se napake in slabo delovanje v prihodnosti ne bi ponavljali,
whereas the critical comments regarding maladministration voiced by the Ombudsman in the 2007 report (critical remarks, draft recommendations and special report) may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future through the implementation of appropriate measures by the institutions and other bodies of the EU,
ker sodelovanje, ki ga je vzpostavil varuh človekovih pravic v okviru evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, že več kot deset let deluje kot prožen sistem za izmenjavo informacij in dobre prakse ter kot sredstvo za usmerjanje pritožnikov na varuhe človekovih pravic ali podobne organe, ki jim lahko najbolj pomagajo,
whereas the cooperation established by the Ombudsman within the European Network of Ombudsmen has functioned for over ten years as a flexible system for exchanging information and best practice and as a means of directing complainants to the ombudsmen or other similar bodies most able to assist them,
ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri zaščiti državljanov Unije v dvanajstih letih od ustanovitve njegove funkcije okrepila, zahvaljujoč neodvisnosti varuha in demokratičnemu nadzoru njegovih dejavnosti, ki ga izvaja Parlament,
whereas the role of the Ombudsman in protecting EU citizens has evolved in the 12 years since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and Parliament's democratic scrutiny of the transparency of his activities,
ker morajo dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije ostati ločene in bi morale kot splošno pravilo vključevati dokončen odstop zadeve v reševanju, namenjeno temu, da se izogneta sporom glede pristojnosti kar zadeva njune prerogative,
whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and of the Committee on Petitions must remain separate and, as a general rule aimed at avoiding conflicts as regards their respective prerogatives, should include reciprocal definitive referral of their respective files,
odobri letno poročilo za leto 2007, ki ga je predložil evropski varuh človekovih pravic, in obliko, v kateri je predloženo, ki zajema povzetek dejavnosti v tem letu ter vsebinsko analizo sklepov varuha človekovih pravic in vprašanj, ki so se obravnavala v različnih fazah postopka; vendar meni, da so potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja za izboljšanje statističnih razpredelnic, v katerih so pomešana števila in odstotki, kar utegne povzročiti zmedo;
Approves the annual report for 2007 presented by the European Ombudsman and the form in which it is presented, combining a summary of the year's activities and a thematic analysis of the Ombudsman's decisions and the problems raised at various stages of the procedure; considers, however, that further efforts should be made to improve the tables of statistics, in which the mix of figures and percentages can be confusing;
poziva, naj vse institucije in organi EU prejmejo proračunska sredstva in kadre, ki jih potrebujejo, da bi lahko državljanom dali hitre in vsebinske odgovore na njihova vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije;
Calls for all EU institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
meni, da varuh človekovih pravic nadaljuje dejavno in uravnoteženo izvajanje svojih pooblastil, kar zadeva preučevanje in obravnavanje pritožb ter vodenje in sklepanje preiskav, pa tudi kar zadeva ohranjanje konstruktivnih odnosov z institucijami in organi EU ter spodbujanje državljanov, da v odnosu do teh institucij in organov uveljavljajo svoje pravice;
Considers that the Ombudsman has continued to exercise his powers in an active and balanced way, both with regard to examining and handling complaints and conducting and concluding enquiries and with regard to maintaining constructive relations with the European Union's institutions and bodies and encouraging citizens to avail themselves of their rights in relation to those institutions and bodies;
meni, da je izraz "nepravilnosti" treba razlagati širše, tako da ne bo zajemal le upravnih aktov, ki kršijo predpise ali načela, določena v Pogodbah ali sekundarni zakonodaji, temveč tudi primere, ko so upravni organi sami prevzeli nekatere obveznosti, na primer s sprejetjem kodeksa dobrega administrativnega ravnanja, ali primere, ko so odobrene politike ali izjave politične narave državljanom vzbudile upravičena in razumna pričakovanja;
Considers that the term 'maladministration' should be broadly interpreted so as to include not only administrative acts which infringe rules or principles laid down by the Treaties or by secondary legislation but also, for example, cases where the administrative authorities themselves have assumed certain obligations through, for instance, the adoption of a code of good administrative behaviour or where approved policies or declarations of a political nature have given rise to legitimate and reasonable expectations among citizens;
podpira prizadevanja varuha človekovih pravic za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja prek dodatnih komentarjev in predlogov institucijam in organom tudi v primerih, ko med preiskavo ni našel nobene nepravilnosti, vendar meni, da so potrebne izboljšave glede na cilj, da bi v upravi EU razvili kulturo državljanom prijaznih in ustrežljivih storitev;
Supports the Ombudsman's efforts to promote good administration through additional remarks and suggestions to institutions and bodies even when he has not found any instance of maladministration during his inquiries, but nevertheless considers that improvements are needed in light of the objective of developing a citizen-friendly and service-minded culture within the EU's administration;
ponavlja svojo zahtevo iz prejšnjih resolucij, da morajo vse institucije in organi EU sprejeti skupen pristop v zvezi z evropskim kodeksom dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev;
Repeats its call, expressed in previous resolutions, for all EU institutions and bodies to adopt a common approach with regard to the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour;
opozarja, da kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev, ki ga je pripravil varuh človekovih pravic in kot ga je odobril Parlament v prej omenjeni resoluciji z dne 6. septembra 2001, zajema osebje vseh institucij in organov Skupnosti ter je objavljen in se redno posodablja na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic;
Notes that the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour proposed by the Ombudsman, as approved by Parliament in its above-mentioned resolution of 6 September 2001, covers the staff of all Community institutions and bodies and, unlike the other codes, has been regularly updated and published on the Ombudsman's website;
poudarja, da je treba še naprej krepiti javno podobo varuha človekovih pravic, čigar cilj je, da obvešča državljane, podjetja, nevladne organizacije in druge subjekte, ter meni, da bi lahko z visokokakovostnimi informacijami zmanjšali število pritožb, ki niso v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic; obenem poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj pritožbe, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti, nemudoma posreduje pristojnim organom prek najustreznejših mrež na nacionalnem in lokalnem nivoju,
Stresses the need to further enhance the public profile of the Ombudsman, whose aim is to provide citizens, companies, non-governmental organisations and other entities with information, and considers that high-quality information may help to reduce the number of complaints which do not fall within the Ombudsman's terms of reference; at the same time, calls on the Ombudsman to forward immediately to the competent authorities, by way of the most appropriate network at national and local level those complaints which do not fall within his terms of reference;
se zaveda povečanja absolutnega števila dopustnih pritožb, vendar meni, da njihov delež glede na skupno število pritožb – 16 % – ostaja nezadovoljiv; zato priporoča izvedbo okrepljene kampanje obveščanja evropskih državljanov, ki naj bo namenjena osveščanju o funkciji in pristojnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic;
Recognises the increase in the absolute number of admissible complaints but considers that the figure in respect of admissible complaints – 16% – remains unsatisfactory; in view of this, recommends that an enhanced information campaign be conducted amongst European citizens designed to raise their awareness of the functions and competence of the European Ombudsman;
pozdravlja splošno konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU ter potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma in dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the generally constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies and endorses him in his role of external control mechanism and, in addition, as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj zagotovi, da bo Komisija ustrezno uporabila svoje diskrecijske pravice za začetek postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev po členu 226 Pogodbe ES ali predlog denarne kazni po členu 228 Pogodbe ES, pri tem pa naj dosledno skrbi, da ne bo zamujala ali da neupravičeno ne bo na hitro sprejemala ukrepov, kar ni v skladu z njenimi pooblastili za nadzor nad izvajanjem prava EU;
Calls on the Ombudsman to ensure that the Commission makes proper use of its discretionary powers to initiate infringement proceedings under Article 226 of the EC Treaty or to propose penalties under Article 228 of the EC Treaty, while taking scrupulous care to avoid delays or unjustifiable failure to take prompt action, which are incompatible with the Commission's powers to oversee the application of EU law;
meni, da lahko Parlament, če katera institucija noče ravnati v skladu s priporočilom iz posebnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic, kljub temu da ga je odobril Parlament, legitimno uporabi svoja pooblastila, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču zaradi dejanja ali opustitve, ki je predmet varuhovega priporočila;
Considers that, if an institution refuses to follow a recommendation contained in a special report by the Ombudsman despite Parliament having approved that recommendation, Parliament could legitimately use its powers to bring an action before the Court of Justice in respect of the act or omission which was the subject of the Ombudsman's recommendation;
opozarja, da je varuh človekovih pravic predložil posebno poročilo, ki ga bo obravnaval Parlament, v katerem je kritično presodil Komisijo, ker ni obravnavala pritožbe v zvezi z evropsko direktivo o delovnem času, o čemer je Parlament dne 3. septembra 2008 sprejel resolucijo Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0398 .
Notes that the Ombudsman has presented a special report criticising the Commission for not dealing with a complaint concerning the European Working Time Directive, on which Parliament adopted a resolution on 3 September 2008 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0398 .
meni, da bi lahko varuh človekovih pravic in odbor za peticije, kadar v okviru svojih nalog in pristojnosti preiskujeta vprašanja, ki se prekrivajo – npr. na eni strani način, kako Komisija obravnava kršitve, in na drugi strani kršitve same – s tesnim sodelovanjem dosegla zelo koristno sinergijo;
Considers that, when the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions, acting within their respective mandates and competences, investigate overlapping issues, such as, respectively, the manner in which the Commission has conducted infringement proceedings and the alleged infringement itself, they can achieve useful synergy through close cooperation;
pozdravlja sodelovanje med varuhom človekovih in Odborom za peticije v institucionalnih okvirih, kar zadeva medsebojno spoštovanje pristojnosti in prerogativ;
Welcomes the relationship between the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions within the institutional frameworks as regards the reciprocal respecting of competences and prerogatives;
pozdravlja sprejetje izjave Evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic oktobra 2007, ki pomembno prispeva k razpoznavnosti evropske razsežnosti dela varuhov človekovih pravic in k pojasnitvi storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo ljudem, ki se pritožijo glede zadev v okviru zakonodaje EU;
Welcomes the adoption of the Statement of the European Network of Ombudsmen in October 2007 as an important contribution towards making the EU dimension of the work of ombudsmen better known and towards clarifying the service they provide to people who complain about matters within the scope of EU law;
pozdravlja pobude evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, da širši javnosti predstavlja tako svoje delo kot tudi delo nacionalnih varuhov, ter varuhu priporoča, naj si še naprej prizadeva za večjo osveščenost državljanov;
Welcomes the European Ombudsman's initiatives to advertise widely both his own work and the work carried out by national ombudsmen, and recommends that the Ombudsman further pursue his efforts to raise citizens' awareness;
spodbuja varuha človekovih pravic, naj prireditvam, namenjenim državljanom in zato morebitnim pritožnikom, še naprej namenja veliko pozornost, saj sta razdelitev pristojnosti in potek postopkov odločanja na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni za mnoge državljane in podjetja očitno še vedno nepregledna;
Encourages the Ombudsman to continue to place great emphasis himself on events involving citizens and, hence, potential complainants, since it is clear that the demarcation of responsibilities and decision-making processes between the European, national and regional levels is still too hard to grasp for many citizens and businesses;
pozdravlja okrepljeno kampanjo obveščanja, ki jo spodbuja komunikacijska strategija varuha človekovih pravic, ki uporablja različne načine obveščanja državljanov in izboljševanja javne ozaveščenosti, kar vodi k večjemu zavedanju o pravicah državljanov in pristojnostih Skupnosti ter večjemu razumevanju področja pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic; vendar ga zaradi visokega števila pritožb, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti, poziva, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja, da bi pogosteje in obsežneje poročal o svojih pristojnostih;
Welcomes the enhanced information campaign promoted by the communications strategy adopted by the Ombudsman, which leads to greater awareness of citizens' rights and Community competences, as well as a greater understanding of the Ombudsman's sphere of competence; urges him, however, in the light of the still substantial number of complaints falling outside his terms of reference, to intensify his efforts to provide more comprehensive information about those terms of reference on a more regular basis;
ker ima vsaka institucija svojo spletno stran, na kateri je mogoče vložiti pritožbe ipd., in ker imajo državljani preglavice z razlikovanjem različnih institucij, pozdravlja oblikovanje interaktivnega priročnika za pomoč državljanom pri prepoznavanju najustreznejše institucije za reševanje njihovih težav;
Given that each institution has its own web site enabling complaints, petitions, etc. to be lodged, and given that this frustrates citizens in distinguishing between the various institutions, welcomes the development of an interactive manual designed to assist citizens in identifying the most suitable forum for resolving their problems;
da bi zmanjšali število nedopustnih pritožb, naslovljenih na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, predlaga, naj se ta zamisel še bolj razvije in se vzpostavi skupna spletna stran institucij EU, s katero bi pomagali državljanom in jih napotili neposredno na institucijo, pristojno za obravnavo njihove pritožbe;
In order to reduce the number of inadmissible complaints filed with the European Ombudsman, suggests that this idea be developed further and that a common web site of the European institutions be put in place to help citizens and refer them directly to the institution competent to handle their complaint;
predlaga, naj varuh človekovih pravic sprejme ukrepe za zmanjšanje števila pritožb v zadevah, ko ni možen noben ukrep;
Proposes that the Ombudsman take measures to reduce the number of complaints in such cases where no action is possible;
poziva evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, naj se zaveže, da bo neposredno posredoval vsako pritožbo, ki spada v pristojnost nacionalnega ali regionalnega varuha človekovih pravic, seveda s soglasjem pritožnika;
Calls on the European Ombudsman to commit himself to directly forwarding, after obtaining the consent of the petitioner concerned, each complaint that falls within the competence of a national or regional ombudsman;