natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da prenos sedeža družbe pomeni tudi prenos nadzora; opozarja, da je treba pri pripravi osnutka 14. direktive o pravu družb o čezmejnem prenosu registriranih sedežev družb zagotoviti ohranitev obstoječih pravic delničarjev, upnikov in delavcev ter obstoječe ravnotežje pri upravljanju družbe;
Notes that a transfer of a company seat implies a transfer of supervision; points out that, in the context of the drafting of the 14th Company Law Directive on the cross-border transfer of registered offices, the maintenance of the existing rights of shareholders, creditors and workers must be guaranteed and the existing equilibrium in the management of the company ("corporate governance") must be preserved;
predlaga, naj se nova direktiva sklicuje na Direktivo 94/45/ES in Direktivo 2005/56/ES, da se pri uporabi evropskih direktiv o pravu družb zagotovi skladnost in upoštevanje vsebine postopkov za udeležbo zaposlenih;
Proposes that reference be made in the new directive to Directive 94/45/EC and Directive 2005/56/EC, in order to guarantee the coherence and substantive nature of employee participation procedures in the application of EU company law directives;
meni, da je treba pred prenosom sedeža družbe predstaviti načrt prenosa in poročilo, v katerem so obrazloženi in utemeljeni pravni in ekonomski vidiki ter posledice prenosa za delničarje in zaposlene; opozarja, da je treba načrt prenosa in poročilo pravočasno posredovati vsem, ki so vpleteni;
Takes the view that a transfer of a company's seat must be preceded by the issuing of a transfer plan and a report explaining and justifying the legal and economic aspects and any consequences of the transfer for shareholders and employees; points out that the transfer plan and the report must be made available in good time to all those involved;
poudarja pozitivne učinke davčne konkurence na gospodarsko rast v okviru lizbonske strategije;
Emphasises the positive effects of tax competition on economic growth in the context of the Lisbon Strategy;
ugotavlja, da bi moral biti prenos sedeža družbe davčno nevtralen;
Notes that a transfer of a company seat should be tax-neutral;
predlaga izboljšavo izmenjave informacij in medsebojne pomoči med davčnimi organi;
Suggests that the exchange of information and mutual assistance between tax authorities be improved;
zahteva preglednost glede uporabe nove direktive v državah članicah, zato predlaga obveznost poročanja držav članic Komisiji, po kateri se v evropskem registru podjetij zabeležijo podjetja, ki preselijo svoj registrirani sedež v skladu z direktivo; poudarja, da se je treba zaradi boljše priprave zakonodaje pri prenosu zahtev glede poročanja v nacionalno zakonodajo izogibati pretiravanju z informacijami, pod pogojem, da se zagotovijo zadostne informacije;
Calls for transparency in the application of the new directive in the Member States and therefore proposes a reporting requirement for Member States vis-à-vis the Commission whereby undertakings transferring their registered office under the directive must be entered in a European companies register; points out that, in the interests of better law-making, excessive information ("overkill") must be avoided when the reporting requirement is transposed into national law, provided that sufficient information is guaranteed;
meni, da zahtevani predlog ne bo imel finančnih posledic;
Considers that the requested proposal does not have any financial implications;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in spremljajoča natančna priporočila posreduje Komisiji in Svetu ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations to the Commission and the Council and to the parliaments and governments of the Member States.
Priporočilo 1 (učinki čezmejnega prenosa registriranega sedeža)
Recommendation 1 (effects of a cross-border transfer of the registered office)
Čezmejni prenos registriranega sedeža družbe ne povzročijo prenehanja družbe ali drugačne prekinitve oziroma izgube statusa pravne osebe; družba ohrani svoj status pravne osebe, vsa njena sredstva, obveznosti in pogodbena razmerja pa ostanejo nespremenjena.
Cross-border transfers of registered offices shall not give rise to the winding-up of the company concerned or to any interruption or loss of its legal personality; consequently, the company shall retain its legal identity and all its assets, liabilities and contractual relations shall remain unaffected.
Nadalje se pri prenosu ne zaobide pravnih, socialnih in davčnih pogojev.
Furthermore, the transfer shall not circumvent legal, social and fiscal conditions.
Priporočilo 2 (postopek prenosa v družbi)
Recommendation 2 (transfer procedure within the company)
pravni status, firmo in registrirani sedež družbe v matični državi članici;
the legal form, name and registered office of the company in the home Member State;
predvideni pravni status, ime in registrirani sedež družbe v državi članici gostiteljici;
the envisaged legal form, name and registered office of the company in the host Member State;
memorandum in statut družbe v državi članici gostiteljici;
the memorandum and articles of association envisaged for the company in the host Member State;
predvideni časovni razpored prenosa;
the timetable envisaged for the transfer;
datum, od katerega se transakcije družbe, ki namerava prenesti svoj registrirani sedež, za računovodske namene obravnavajo, kot da je družba v državi članici gostiteljici;
the date from which the transactions of the company intending to transfer its registered office will be treated for accounting purposes as being located in the host Member State;
kjer je primerno, podrobne informacije o prenosu glavne uprave ali glavnega kraja poslovanja;
where appropriate, detailed information on the transfer of the central administration or principal place of business;
pravice, zagotovljene članom družbe, zaposlenim ali upnikom, oziroma predlagani ustrezni ukrepi;
the rights guaranteed to the company's members, employees and creditors or the relevant measures proposed;
če se družba upravlja na podlagi udeležbe zaposlenih in če nacionalna zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice ne določa takšne sheme, informacije o postopkih, pri čemer so določeni dogovori za udeležbo zaposlenih.
if the company is managed on the basis of employee participation and if the national legislation of the host Member States does not impose such a scheme, information on the procedures whereby the arrangements for employee participation are determined.
Družba, ki načrtuje prenos, mora v skladu z veljavno nacionalno zakonodajo in Direktivo 68/151/EGS Prva direktiva Sveta 68/151/EGS z dne 9. marca 1968 o uskladitvi zaščitnih ukrepov za varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb, ki jih države članice zahtevajo od gospodarskih družb v skladu z drugim odstavkom člena 58 Pogodbe, zato da se oblikujejo zaščitni ukrepi z enakim učinkom v vsej Skupnosti (UL L 65, 14.3.1968, str.
A company planning a transfer shall be required to publish at least the following particulars pursuant to the applicable national legislation, in accordance with Directive 68/151/EEC First Council Directive 68/151/EEC of 9 March 1968 on co-ordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and others, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 58 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent throughout the Community (OJ L 65, 14.3.1968, p.
pravni status, firmo in registrirani sedež družbe v matični državi članici, pa tudi podrobnosti, predvidene za družbo v državi članici gostiteljici;
the legal form, name and registered office of the company in the home Member State as well as those envisaged for the company in the host Member State;
register, pri katerem je za družbo vložena dokumentacija in podrobnosti iz člena 3(2) Direktive 68/151/EGS, ter številko vpisa v register;
the register in which the documents and particulars referred to in Article 3(2) of Directive 68/151/EEC have been entered in respect of the company and the entry number in that register;
navedbo dogovorov, da upniki in manjšinski delničarji družbe lahko uveljavijo svoje pravice, in navedbo naslova, na katerem so brezplačno na voljo popolne informacije o teh dogovorih.
an indication of the arrangements whereby creditors and minority shareholders of the company may exercise their rights and the address at which full information concerning those arrangements can be obtained free of charge.
Vodstvo ali uprava družbe, ki načrtuje prenos, mora pripraviti poročilo, v katerem pojasni in upraviči pravne in gospodarske vidike predloga ter opiše posledice za člane družbe, upnike in delavce, razen če ni dogovorjeno drugače.
The management or board of the company planning a transfer shall also draw up a report explaining and justifying the proposal's legal and economic aspects and indicating the consequences for the company's members, creditors and employees, unless agreed otherwise.
Priporočilo 3 (odločitev skupščine delničarjev o prenosu)
Recommendation 3 (transfer decision by meeting of the shareholders)
Skupščina delničarjev odobri predlog o prenosu v skladu z določenimi dogovori, pri čemer je potrebna večina glasov za spremembo memoranduma in statuta v skladu z zakonodajo, ki velja za družbo v njeni matični državi članici.
The shareholders' meeting shall approve the transfer proposal in accordance with the arrangements laid down and by the majority required to amend the memorandum and articles of association under the legislation applicable to the company in its home Member State.
Priporočilo 4 (postopek upravnega prenosa in preverjanje)
Recommendation 4 (administrative transfer procedure and verification)
Potrdilo, kopija memoranduma in statuta, predvidenih za družbo v državi članici gostiteljici, in kopija predloga o prenosu se v ustreznem času predložijo organu, odgovornemu za registracijo v državi članici gostiteljici.
The certificate, a copy of the memorandum and articles of association envisaged for the company in the host Member State and a copy of the transfer proposal shall be presented within an appropriate period of time to the body responsible for registration in the host Member State.
Organi, pristojni za registracijo v državi članici gostiteljici, preverijo, če so izpolnjeni vsebinski in formalni pogoji za prenos.
The competent authority responsible for registration in the host Member State shall verify that the substantive and formal conditions for the transfer are met.
datum registracije;
the date of registration;
nova in prejšnja številka vpisa v register matične države članice oziroma register države članice gostiteljice.
the new and former entry number in the respective registers of the home and host Member States.
Priporočilo 5 (udeležba zaposlenih)
Recommendation 5 (employee participation)
če država članica gostiteljica ne zagotovi vsaj enake ravni udeležbe, kot je v družbi v matični državi članici, ali
where the host Member State does not provide for at least the same level of participation as operated in the company in the home Member State, or
če zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice ne podeljuje zaposlenim v poslovalnicah družbe, ki se nahajajo v drugih državah članicah, enake pravice za izvrševanje pravic soodločanja, kot so jih ti zaposleni imeli pred prenosom.
where the legislation of the host Member State does not give employees of establishments of the company situated in other Member States the same entitlement to exercise participation rights as enjoyed by such employees before the transfer.
V teh primerih se ustrezno uporabljajo določbe člena 16 Direktive 2005/56/ES.
In these cases, the provisions of Article 16 of Directive 2005/56/EC should apply accordingly.
Priporočilo 6 (tretje strani, ki jih zadeva prenos)
Recommendation 6 (third parties concerned by the transfer)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 10. marca 2009 o prihodnosti skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema ( 2008/2305(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 10 March 2009 on the future of the Common European Asylum System ( 2008/2305(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 63(1) in (2) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 63(1) and (2) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Ženevske konvencije iz leta 1951 o statusu beguncev in dodatnega protokola iz leta 1967 k tej konvenciji,
having regard to the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, and the 1967 Additional Protocol thereto,
("Dublinska uredba"),
("the Dublin Regulation"),
("direktiva o sprejemu"),
("Reception Directive"),
("direktiva o azilu"),
("Asylum Directive"),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o uporabi Direktive 2003/9/ES z dne 27. januarja 2003 o minimalnih standardih za sprejem prosilcev za azil ( KOM(2007)0745 ),
having regard to the Commission report on the application of Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers ( COM(2007)0745 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. junija 2007 o azilu: sodelovanje v praksi in kakovost odločanja na področju skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema UL C 146 E, 12.6.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 21 June 2007 on entitled 'Asylum: practical cooperation, quality of decision-making in the common European asylum system' OJ C 146 E, 12.6.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 2. septembra 2008 o oceni dublinskega sistema Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0385 .
having regard to its resolution of 2 September 2008 on the evaluation of the Dublin system Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0385 .
ob upoštevanju poročil Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve o obiskih v različnih centrih za pridržanje, da bi se preverili pogoji sprejema,
having regard to the reports of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on the visits to various holding centres in order to monitor reception conditions,
ob upoštevanju sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 6. maja 2008 v zadevi C-133/06 Evropski parlament proti Svetu Evropske unije UL C 158, 21.6.2008, str.
having regard to the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 6 May 2008 in Case C-133/06 European Parliament v Council of the European Union OJ C 158, 21.6.2008, p.
, o tožbi za razveljavitev direktive o azilu, predvsem za razveljavitev določb direktive o postopku sprejetja in spremembi skupnih najosnovnejših seznamov varnih držav članic,
concerning an action for annulment of the Asylum Directive, seeking in particular annulment of the Directive's provisions on the procedure for adoption and amendment of minimum common lists of safe countries,
ob upoštevanju Evropskega pakta o priseljevanju in azilu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel 16. oktobra 2008 in katerega četrti cilj je "zgraditi Evropo azila",
having regard to the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum adopted by the European Council on 16 October 2008, whose fourth objective is to 'construct a Europe of Asylum',
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0050/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6-0050/2009 ),
ker so zakonodajni instrumenti prve faze vzpostavitve skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema omogočili sprejetje skupnih minimalnih standardov, ne pa tudi enakih pogojev dostopa do zaščite na celotnem ozemlju EU, zaradi česar še vedno prihaja do naknadnega gibanja in večkratnih prošenj,
whereas the legislative instruments relating to the first phase of the establishment of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) have allowed the introduction of common minimum standards but not of equal conditions of access to protection throughout the EU and, as a result, there are still problems such as secondary movements and multiple applications,
ker utegnejo biti zaradi meril o državi prvega vstopa v okviru dublinskega sistema nekatere države članice, zlasti tiste, ki so na zunanji meji EU, nesorazmerno obremenjene zgolj zaradi svoje izpostavljene geografske lege, in ker ima to škodljive posledice tako za države članice kot za prosilce za azil,
whereas the Dublin system's first country of entry criteria can result in a disproportionate burden being imposed on some Member States, in particular on those constituting the EU's external border, simply as a result of their exposed location, and whereas this has harmful consequences for both Member States and asylum seekers,
ker ocena dublinskega sistema Komisije razkriva, da je moralo leta 2005 trinajst mejnih držav članic obravnavati rastoče izzive, ki izhajajo iz dublinskega sistema,
whereas the Commission's evaluation of the Dublin system reveals that, in 2005, the 13 border Member States had to deal with increasing challenges raised by the Dublin system,
ker Komisija v svojem poročilu o oceni direktive o sprejemu navaja resne težave pri izvajanju direktive, zlasti v zaprtih centrih in na tranzitnih območjih, kar so lahko med svojimi številnimi obiski neposredno ugotovile parlamentarne delegacije,
whereas, in its above-mentioned report on the Reception Directive, the Commission noted serious problems in its implementation, in particular in closed centres and transit zones, as the Parliamentary delegations were able to note at first hand during their many visits,
ugotavlja, da je v zadnjem letu po vsem svetu število beguncev naraslo na več kot 12 milijonov, število notranje razseljenih oseb pa na 26 milijonov; v zvezi s tem podpira vzpostavitev skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema in pozdravlja načrt azilne politike, ki ga je pripravila Komisija in služi kot načrt za dokončanje skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema;
Notes that in the past year the number of refugees has grown to more than 12 million refugees and 26 million internally displaced people worldwide; in this context, supports the establishment of a CEAS and welcomes the Commission's Policy Plan on Asylum, serving as a roadmap for the completion of the CEAS;
obžaluje, da se zaradi spremembe pravne podlage, do katere bo prišlo z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, načrtuje odložitev roka za dokončanje druge faze skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema – ki naj bi odpravila neprimerne razlike med azilnimi sistemi držav članic – v leto 2012;
Regrets that, owing to the change of legal basis which will result from the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, there are plans to put back to 2012 the deadline for completion of the second phase of the CEAS, which is due to put an end to the unhealthy disparities between the asylum systems of Member States;
opozarja, da stopnje priznavanja kandidatov za status begunca za državljane nekaterih tretjih držav nihajo od približno 0 % do 90 % med državami članicami;
Draws attention to the fact that recognition rates of candidates to refugee status for certain third-country nationals vary from approximately 0% up to 90% between Member States;
poudarja, da mora uskladitev standardov za skupni azilni postopek in enoten azilni status privesti do visoke ravni zaščite v celotni EU ter ne sme temeljiti na najmanjšem skupnem imenovalcu, saj tako skupni azilni sistem ne bi imel dodane vrednosti;
Stresses that the harmonisation of standards leading to a common asylum procedure and uniform asylum status should result in a high level of protection throughout the EU and should not be based on the lowest common denominator, which would deprive the common asylum scheme of its added value;
obžaluje, da je bil koncept instituta azila, ki je pomemben del demokracije in zaščite človekovih pravic, v zadnjih letih resno spodkopan; ponovno poudarja potrebo po polnem spoštovanju pravic in potreb prosilcev za azil ter načela nevračanja;
Regrets that the concept of the institution of asylum, an essential part of democracy and protection of human rights, has been severely eroded in recent years; reiterates the need for full respect for the rights and needs of asylum seekers and the principle of non-refoulement;
opozarja, da bi morala EU na zunanjih mejah zagotoviti mehanizme za prepoznavanje prosilcev za azil in omogočiti osebam, ki imajo pravico do mednarodne zaščite, dostop do njenega ozemlja, tudi v okviru dejavnosti nadzora svojih zunanjih meja;
Draws attention to the fact that the EU should provide for mechanisms at the external borders to identify asylum seekers and ensure that persons entitled to international protection gain access to EU territory, including in the context of its external border control operations;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija opredelila dostop do zaščite osebam, ki jo potrebujejo, kot enega od poglavitnih ciljev skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission has identified access for those in need of protection to be one of the overarching objectives of the CEAS;
poziva Evropsko agencijo za upravljanje in operativno sodelovanje na zunanjih mejah držav članic Evropske Unije (Frontex), naj zagotovi natančne podatke o številu prosilcev za azil, ki so bili kot taki prepoznani med njenimi operacijami, in o usodi oseb, ki so bile med temi operacijami prestrežene in vrnjene v državo tranzita ali izvora; poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog za revizijo mandata agencije Frontex, da se izrecno navede, da so vprašanja zaščite in človekovih pravic sestavni del upravljanja zunanjih meja EU;
Calls on the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) to provide detailed data relating to the number of asylum seekers identified as such during its operations and the plight of persons intercepted and sent back to a country of transit or origin during its operations; calls on the Commission to table a proposal for a revision of Frontex' mandate in order to explicitly state that protection and human rights concerns are an integral part of the management of the EU external borders;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Sodišče v prej omenjeni sodbi C-133/06 razveljavilo odstavka 1 in 2 člena 29 ter odstavek 3 člena 36 direktive o azilu, ki sta obravnavala sprejetje in spremembo skupnega najosnovnejšega seznama varnih držav izvora ter skupnega seznama varnih tretjih držav;
Welcomes the fact that, in its above-mentioned judgment in Case C-133/06, the Court of Justice annulled paragraphs 1 and 2 of Article 29 and paragraph 3 of Article 36 of the Asylum Directive, which concerned the adoption or amendment of a minimum common list of safe countries of origin and a common list of safe third countries;
pozdravlja pozitivne izkušnje v nekaterih državah članicah, kjer se prosilce za azil – po predložitvi njihove prošnje za mednarodno zaščito – sprejme v ustanove, ki so odprte in v celoti vključene v lokalne skupnosti;
Welcomes the positive initiatives carried out in some Member States to welcome asylum seekers – on submission of their request for international protection – in facilities that are open and fully integrated with local communities;
meni, da so prosilci za azil ranljive osebe, za katere je treba zagotoviti primerne pogoje za sprejem; opozarja, da zaporniško okolje v nobenem primeru ne more pomagati pri premagovanju travmatičnih izkušenj, ki so jih preživeli v državah izvora ali med potjo v Evropo;
Considers that asylum seekers are vulnerable persons who require appropriate reception conditions; draws attention to the fact that a prison environment can under no circumstances help them to overcome the traumas experienced in their countries of origin or during their journey to Europe;
pozdravlja določbe, omenjene v zadnjih predlogih Komisije, da države članice osebe ne bodo pridržale samo zato, ker je zaprosila za mednarodno zaščito; meni, da se prosilcev za azil, glede na njihov izrazito ranljiv položaj, načeloma ne bi smelo pridržati;
Welcomes the provisions mentioned in the latest Commission proposals that Member States shall not hold a person in detention for the sole reason that he or she is an applicant for international protection; considers that asylum seekers should, as a matter of principle, not be placed in detention, in view of their particularly vulnerable position;