natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je SKP sprožila precejšen razvoj in znatne spremembe v kmetijstvu novih držav članic, in ker so se pojavile tudi nekatere težave in napetosti, in sicer predvsem zato, ker predpisi SKP ne podpirajo v zadostni meri razvoja uravnoteženega in trajnostnega kmetijskega sektorja, zlasti kar zadeva živinorejo, vrtnarstvo ter povezovanje različnih faz dejavnosti,
whereas the CAP triggered considerable development and significant changes in the agriculture of the new Member States, and whereas some problems and tensions have arisen mainly due to the fact that the CAP rules do not support sufficiently the development of a balanced, sustainable agricultural sector, especially as far as animal husbandry, horticulture and up- and downstream integrations are concerned,
ker je bilo z aktom o pristopu predvideno dolgo obdobje postopnega uvajanja (9 let) z nizko začetno stopnjo (25 % stopnje, ki velja za EU) neposrednih plačil za nove države članice, čeprav zanje v celoti veljajo predpisi notranjega trga in proračunskega prispevka; ker raven stroškov in prihodkov v novih državah članicah ne upravičuje takšne stopnje diferenciacije, ki povzroča neenake konkurenčne pogoje za kmete iz novih držav članic,
whereas the Act of Accession introduced a long phasing-in (nine years), with a low starting level (25 % of the level applicable in the EU) for the direct payments in the new Member States, though internal market and budgetary contribution rules fully apply to them; whereas cost and income levels in the new Member States do not justify this degree of differentiation, which results in unequal conditions for the new Member States" farmers in terms of competition,
ker težave, ki bi jih morale rešiti nove države članice, zahtevajo predvsem strukturne spremembe za povečanje konkurenčnosti; ker so ukrepi SKP v podporo prihodkom in zagotavljanju cen bistveno prispevali k takemu povečanju,
whereas the problems which should be tackled in the new Member States are, primarily, those requiring structural changes to strengthen competitiveness; whereas CAP measures supporting incomes and guaranteeing prices significantly contributed to such strengthening,
ker Komisija in Svet nista takoj pokazala razumevanja za posebne težave novih držav članic in jim ponudila potrebne pomoči (na primer težave na trgu sadja in zelenjave, zlasti pri jagodičju, češnjah in jabolkih, neupravičena prepoved Rusije in Ukrajine za uvoz iz Poljske, sprememba in predlagana odprava intervencijskih predpisov za koruzo in uvoz medu iz tretjih držav),
whereas the Commission and the Council have been late or reluctant in understanding the new Member States" special problems and offering the necessary help (for example problems on the fruit and vegetables market, especially as regards soft fruits, cherries and apples, the unjustified ban on Polish exports by Russia and Ukraine, the modification and proposed abolition of maize intervention rules, honey imports from third countries),
ker je v novih državah članicah premalo proizvajalcev tudi lastnikov v živilsko-predelovalnem sektorju in ker distribucijske verige zlorabljajo svoj položaj premoči, kar resno omejuje konkurenčnost kmetov ter njihovo sodelovanje in vključevanje,
whereas the clear shortage of producer-owners in the food-processing industry in the new Member States and abuse of the dominant position of distribution chains seriously limit the competitiveness of the farmers and their possibilities for cooperation and integration,
ker je osem od desetih novih držav članic za neposredna plačila izbralo shemo enotnega plačila na površino (SAPS),
whereas 8 out of 10 new Member States chose the single area payment scheme (SAPS) for the direct payments,
ker so bile potrebe po pomoči Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja v novih državah članicah precej večje od razpoložljivih proračunskih sredstev za obdobje 2004–2006, hkrati pa so izvedbeni predpisi programov za razvoj podeželja omejevali dinamično uporabo dodeljenih sredstev Skupnosti; ker so ti dejavniki precej zmanjšali vpliv drugega stebra SKP v novih državah članicah in se lahko zgodi, da tudi v obdobju novega finančnega okvira ne bodo odpravljeni,
whereas the Community budgetary assistance necessary for rural development in the new Member States was significantly higher than the available budgetary allocations for the 2004-2006 period, and at the same time implementation rules of the rural development programmes limited the dynamic utilisation of Community allocations; whereas those factors have considerably narrowed the impact of the CAP second pillar in the new Member States, and may persist also during the new financial framework,
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil živilsko-predelovalni sektor novih držav članic v celoti in brez zapletov vključen v skupni trg Evropske unije;
Welcomes the fact that the agricultural and food sector of the new Member States has been integrated thoroughly and smoothly into the common market of the European Union;
poudarja, da čeprav je širitev leta 2004 povzročila motnje na kmetijskih in živilskih trgih v določenih novih državah članicah, je pomembno prispevala k razvoju trajnih trgovinskih odnosov med 25 državami članicami;
Stresses that, although the 2004 enlargement caused disturbances on the agricultural and food markets of certain new Member States, it contributed significantly to the development of well-established market relations in the 25 Member States as a whole;
poudarja, da je širitev vsaj deloma koristila kmetijskemu in živilskemu sektorju v novih in starih državah članicah – zainteresirane strani v novih državah članicah so pridobile predvsem z visoko stopnjo kmetijske podpore ter s povečanjem trgovinskih možnosti, v starih državah članicah pa sta se okrepili živilsko-predelovalna industrija in mednarodna trgovina, povečale so se tudi naložbe ter promet v maloprodaji, zlasti v predpristopnem obdobju;
Points out that the agriculture and food sector in both the new and old Member States benefited at least partially from the enlargement – stakeholders in the new Member States benefited from the higher level of agricultural support and from the increase of trade possibilities, while the food-processing industry and international trade in the old Member States progressed, and there was a higher level of investment and a rise in turnover in the retail sector, in particular in the run-up to enlargement;
meni, da je bila na splošno integracija novih držav članic uspešna, vendar to ni vedno očitno, saj mnogo kmetij ni zabeležilo povečanja svojih prihodkov; poudarja, da se je z višjimi odkupnimi cenami in subvencijami deloma izravnalo bistveno povišanje proizvodnih stroškov (na primer zvišanje cen goriva, energije, gnojil, fitofarmacevtskih sredstev in strojev);
Considers that overall the integration of the new Member States has been successful but that the situation is not always clear cut, as not all farms have seen their incomes rise; points out that the increase in purchase prices and in subsidies were partially offset by the significant rises in production costs (for example rises in the cost of fuel, energy, fertiliser, plant protection products and machinery);
poudarja dejstvo, da se zaradi širitve ni povečala raven tveganja na področju varnosti hrane, zdravja živali in na fitosanitarnem področju, in v zvezi s tem ugotavlja, da so standardi in učinkovitost dela pristojnih organov v novih državah članicah v določenih vidikih nad povprečjem Evropske unije;
Stresses the fact that enlargement has not increased the risk level as regards food safety and animal and plant health, and notes in this respect that the standards and efficiency of the work of the competent authorities in the new Member States are above the EU average in certain aspects;
ugotavlja, da širitev leta 2004 proračunu SKP ni naložila prevelikega bremena in ni zahtevala velikih sprememb proračuna EU, vendar bo zaradi sklepov o zamrznitvi kmetijskega trga ter ohranitvi višine neposrednih plačil in finančnega okvira 2007–2013 potreben od leta 2007 dalje dodatni trud EU-15 na osnovi načela solidarnosti; poudarja, da so zaradi sklepov, ki jih je sprejel Evropski svet decembra 2005, proizvajalci v EU-15 poleg posledic sklepov o izvajanju politike krepitve drugega stebra in prostovoljnega prilagajanja občutili posledice znižanja proračuna zaradi pristopa Bolgarije in Romunije;
Observes that the 2004 enlargement has not imposed an unbearable burden on the CAP budget and has not demanded significant changes as far as the EU budget is concerned but that decisions on freezing the market and direct payment budget and the 2007-2013 financial framework require a sacrifice based on the principle of solidarity from the EU-15 from 2007 onwards; also notes that, further to the European Council's decisions of December 2005, EU-15 producers suffered further cutbacks because of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania, over and above the decisions to implement policies, such as voluntary modulation, to strengthen the second pillar;
obžaluje, ker ne leta 2004 ne 2007 niso bila dodeljena dodatna sredstva za širitev, niti tista, ki so bila prvotno predvidena;
Laments the fact that higher quotas were not allocated for either the 2004 or 2007 enlargement, if only at the level initially planned;
Izvajanje SKP v novih državah članicah
Application of the CAP in the new Member States
ugotavlja, da zaradi velikih razlik med kmetijskimi sektorji novih držav članic prihaja do različnega učinka izvajanja SKP ter različnega obsega in razsežnosti izzivov, s katerimi se soočajo nove države članice;
Notes that the considerable differences between the agricultural sectors of the new Member States result in differences in the impact of the application of the CAP and in the scope and vigour of the challenges the new Member States are facing;
ugotavlja, da po pristopu desetih novih držav članic v EU leta 2004 določbe Skupnosti niso bile ustrezno prilagojene novim pogojem na določenih trgih (na primer na trgu jagodičja in škroba);
Notes that Community rules were not adequately adapted to the new conditions in certain markets (e.g. the markets in soft fruit and in starch) following the enlargement of the EU by 10 countries in 2004;
ugotavlja, da prilagoditev pogojem in predpisom notranjega trga ter izvajanje SKP – zlasti glede veterinarskih in fitosanitarnih predpisov, predpisov v zvezi z varnostjo hrane in organizacijo skupnega trga ter drugih horizontalnih predpisov – zahtevata veliko truda od kmetov in uprave v novih državah članicah;
Notes that adaptation to the conditions and rules of the internal market and the application of the CAP – especially concerning veterinary, phytosanitary, food safety, common market organisation and other horizontal rules – have resulted in considerable efforts being required from farmers and administrations in the new Member States;
meni, da mnogo mesecev Komisija ni pripisovala zadostnega pomena trgovinski zapori na izvoz poljskih kmetijskih proizvodov v Ukrajino in Rusijo in ni sprejela učinkovitih ukrepov za njeno odpravo;
Considers that over a period of several months the Commission failed to attach adequate importance to the ban on the export of Polish agricultural products to Ukraine and Russia or to take effective action to bring it to an end;
ugotavlja, da kljub temu, da so predpristopni programi, ki jih je financirala EU, prispevali k pripravi na izvajanje SKP in da so se partnerski programi izkazali za uporabne, so bili prvotni cilji le delno doseženi in da so bili ukrepi Skupnosti le delno učinkoviti;
Notes that, although EU-financed pre-accession programmes contributed to the preparation for the application of the CAP and twinning programmes proved to be useful, the original goals were only partly achieved and the efficiency of the Community measures was limited;
opozarja, da se je Posebni pristopni program za razvoj kmetijstva in podeželja (SAPARD) začel s precejšnjo zamudo in da je bil njegov obseg omejen, predvsem zaradi zapletenih načinov izvajanja in pomanjkanja pravočasnih odločitev Komisije in organov v novih državah članicah;
Recalls that the Special Accession Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development (SAPARD) started with a considerable delay and the scope was also limited, mainly owing to the complicated requirements and lack of due-time decisions of the Commission and of authorities of the new Member States;
ugotavlja, da se nekatere nove države članice soočajo s precejšnjimi težavami pri izvajanju programov Skupnosti za razvoj podeželja zaradi zapletenosti njihovih pravil in upravnega bremena, ki ga povzroča njihovo upravljanje;
Observes that certain new Member States face considerable difficulties in implementing the Community rural development programmes due to the complexity of their rules and the administrative burden of their management;
ponavlja, da glede na to, da imajo neposredna plačila pomembno vlogo pri razvoju in prilagajanju kmetijskega sektorja novih držav članic, je njihova nizka raven v prvih letih postopnega uvajanja ne samo zavrla potrebno prilagajanje, ampak tudi ustvarila neenake konkurenčne pogoje na notranjem trgu, mnogo podjetnikov pa ni imelo sredstev, da bi se lahko odzvali na take razmere;
Reiterates that, as direct payments play a substantial role in the development and adaptation of the agricultural sector of the new Member States, their low level in the first years of the phasing-in period not only hindered the necessary adaptation but created unequal conditions for competition on the internal market as well, which many operators were economically unable to cope with;
poudarja pomembno vlogo programov za ureditev podeželja tako zaradi nove tržne usmerjenosti kmetij – denimo na področju predelave in trženja svojih izdelkov ali turizma – kot zaradi nadomeščanja prihodkov za tiste, ki zaradi gospodarskih razlogov opustijo primarno kmetijsko proizvodnjo;
Stresses the important role of the rural development programmes both in establishing a new, market-oriented approach for farms – e.g. in processing and marketing their own products or in tourism – and in creating alternative sources of income for those who abandon basic agricultural production for economic reasons;
ugotavlja, da različni ravni neposrednih plačil v EU-10 in EU-15 nista zagotovili enakih pogojev za vse ter so zato proizvajalci v več novih državah članicah celo izgubili svoj delež na domačih trgih, k čemur je prispevala tudi konkurenca zaradi povečanega uvoza in izvoza iz tretjih držav zaradi spremenjenega carinskega režima;
Notes that the different levels of the direct payments between the EU-10 and EU-15 have not ensured a level playing field, thus in several new Member States the producers lost ground even on their domestic markets, a situation to which, primarily, competition resulting from an increase in imports and exports from third countries due to the changed customs regime also contributed;
ugotavlja, da so bili pomisleki Komisije do novih držav članic zaradi domnevnih presežkov zalog ob pristopu in grožnje z visokimi denarnimi kaznimi v večini primerov neutemeljene in so temeljile na napačnih izračunih; nadalje ugotavlja, da na kmetijskih trgih ni bilo zaznati nikakršnega neravnovesja, ki bi se ga lahko pripisalo domnevno prevelikim zalogam;
Notes that the Commission's reservations towards the new Member States with regard to the alleged surplus of stock on the day of accession to the EU and its threats to impose large financial penalties were unjustified in most cases and based on erroneous calculations; further notes that no disruption of the balance was observed on any of the agricultural markets that could have been the result of this alleged supply surplus;
poudarja, da so bile nove države članice prisiljene uporabiti dopolnilna nacionalna neposredna plačila ("top-ups") (ki jih lahko obravnavamo kot obliko sofinanciranja in navidezne ponovne nacionalizacije neposrednih plačil Skupnosti), ki so v številnih novih državah članicah privedla do resnih političnih in gospodarskih težav, saj so nacionalnim proračunom naložila veliko breme in omejila možnosti za uporabo shem državne pomoči;
Emphasises that the new Member States were forced to apply complementary national direct payments (CNDP, 'top-ups'), which can be considered as a form of cofinancing and a quasi-renationalisation of Community direct payments, and that this led to serious political and economic difficulties in various new Member States as they imposed a serious burden on the national budgets and limited the possibility of applying state aid schemes;
poudarja, da je bila v nasprotju s splošnimi cilji in načeli SKP in v nasprotju s prilagajanjem v EU-15 večina novih držav članic zaradi proračunskih omejitev prisiljena del odobrenih sredstev Skupnosti, namenjenih za razvoj podeželja, prerazporediti za financiranje dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil, kot je predvideno v aktu o pristopu;
Points out that, due to budgetary constraints, contrary to the general objectives and principles of the CAP and contrary to the modulation in the EU-15, the majority of the new Member States were forced to regroup a part of their Community rural development allocations for CNDP purposes, as allowed by the Act of Accession;
opozarja na mnenje nekaterih novih držav članic, da plačila na površino, ki so popolnoma nevezana, ne prispevajo docela k uravnoteženemu razvoju in trajnostni naravnanosti njihovega kmetijstva, in da bi bile v nekaterih državah članicah do leta 2013 vsaj začasno lahko potrebne sektorske preference in/ali neobvezna vezana plačila, ki bi jih bilo treba obravnavati na zahtevo; opozarja na uspešno prakso popolnoma ali delno vezanih dopolnilnih nacionalnih neposrednih plačil ter začasnih ukrepov državne pomoči;
Refers to the opinion of some new Member States that fully decoupled, area-based payments do not contribute entirely to the balanced development and sustainability of their agriculture, and that sector preferences and/or optional coupled payments could be necessary at least temporarily in certain Member States until 2013, and should be considered if requested; refers to the successful practice of the fully or partially coupled CNDP and temporary state aid measures in this respect;
ugotavlja, da bi večina novih držav članic želela čim dlje nadaljevati z uporabo sheme enotnega plačila na površino (SAPS), saj prehod na shemo enotnega plačila (SPS) predstavlja izredno veliko upravno in tehnično breme, prav tako pa se SAPS popolnoma vključuje v bodočo politiko nevezanih plačil;
Observes that the majority of new Member States would like to continue the application of the single area payment scheme (SAPS) as long as possible, since the switch to the Single Payment Scheme (SPS) means extremely high administrative and technical burdens and the SAPS is completely compatible with a future policy of decoupled payments;
meni, da je treba izvajati pravila okoljske navzkrižne skladnosti ter zahteve za dobre kmetijske prakse in dobre okoljske razmere tako v starih kot v novih državah članicah; predlaga postopno uvajanje pravil okoljske navzkrižne skladnosti z zaključkom do konca obdobja postopnega uvajanja; predlaga, da se novim državam članicam nudi možnost odložitve izvajanja pravil okoljske navzkrižne skladnosti, dokler se ne konča obdobje postopnega uvajanja neposrednih plačil; nadalje predlaga, da ostanejo v veljavi zahteve za dobre kmetijske in okoljske razmere vsaj v času trajanja SAPS, saj ima lahko večina novih držav članic težave pri prilagajanju zapletenim in dragim predpisom o okoljski navzkrižni skladnosti;
Considers that it is necessary to implement cross-compliance rules and requirements concerning sound agricultural practices and environmental conditions both in the new and the old Member States; proposes to introduce the cross-compliance rules gradually, with full implementation by the end of the phasing-in period; also proposes that the new Member States be given the option of postponing the application of the cross-compliance rules until the end of the phasing-in of the direct payments; proposes further that the requirements concerning good agricultural and environmental conditions remain in force at least during the SAPS period as the majority of the new Member States may have difficulties in achieving conformity with the complex and costly cross-compliance rules;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Svet sprejel predlog Komisije o ohranitvi SAPS na površino do leta 2010 in udeležbi novih držav članic v shemi pomoči za energetske kulture;
Welcomes the fact that the Council has adopted the Commission's proposal on the extension of the SAPS until the end of 2010 and on the involvement of new Member States in the energy crop aid scheme;
zahteva, da Komisija v okviru poenostavitve in racionalizacije izvajanja SKP, neposrednih plačilnih shem in programov za razvoj podeželja upošteva težave, s katerimi se morajo soočati zlasti nove države članice, ter naj predlaga ustrezne rešitve, vendar brez oddaljevanja od predpisov za izvajanje SKP;
Calls on the Commission, in the context of simplifying and rationalising the implementation of the CAP, the direct payment schemes and the rural development programmes, to take account of the problems faced primarily by the new Member States and to propose appropriate solutions without departing from the implementing rules for the CAP;
poudarja, da bi morala Komisija v svojih sklepih v okviru SKP bolj upoštevati težave in pomisleke novih držav članic;
Stresses that the Commission should take the special problems and concerns of the new Member States more into account in its decisions within the framework of the CAP;
izraža svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi nedavnega predloga Komisije, da z letom 2007 popolnoma odpravi intervencijsko shemo za koruzo; ugotavlja, da je način, uporabljen za predstavitev predloga, v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli EU zaradi izbire trenutka, pomanjkanja zadovoljive ocene – zlasti kar zadeva posledice takšnega sklepa o skupni organizaciji trgov v sektorju žitaric in neposrednih plačil na površino – pomanjkanja alternativ ali prehodnih obdobij; meni, da bo prezgodna ukinitev intervencijske sheme za koruzo imela najbrž hude posledice;
Expresses its serious concern regarding the Commission's recent proposal to completely abolish the intervention system in respect of maize from 2007; notes that the way the proposal was presented is contrary to the fundamental principles of the EU given the timing, the lack of a proper evaluation – especially as regards implications for the common organisation of the market in cereals and the area-based direct payments – and the lack of alternatives or transitional periods; is of the opinion that premature abolition of the maize intervention system would probably have serious consequences;
meni, da je treba v duhu reforme SKP iz leta 2003 razmisliti o uvedbi plačil na površino za jagodičje, namenjeno predelavi, ki bi bila obvezno vezana na dejavnosti živilsko-predelovalnih podjetij ali organizacij proizvajalcev in na obvezno prodajo navedenih proizvodov v okviru trgovinskih sporazumov, kar bi lahko pripomoglo h krepitvi konkurence v sektorju jagodičja in k izboljšanju položaja kmetov v državah članicah, zlasti na Poljskem;
Believes that, in the spirit of the 2003 CAP reform, the introduction of area payments for soft fruit produced for processing should be considered along with the possibility of making them conditional on compulsory membership of food-processing groups or producers" organisations and the requirement to sell products under commercial contracts, which could contribute to increasing competitiveness in the soft fruit sector and improving the situation for growers in Member States, in particular Poland;