natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(g) pravice, zagotovljene delničarjem družbe, zaposlenim in upnikom, oziroma ustrezne predlagane ukrepe in naslov, na katerem so vse informacije o tem brezplačno na voljo;
(g) the rights guaranteed to the company’s shareholders, employees and creditors or the relevant measures proposed and the address where all the information thereon can be obtained, free of charge;
(h) če se družba upravlja na podlagi soodločanja zaposlenih in če nacionalna zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice ne določa takšne sheme, informacije o postopkih, ki urejajo soodločanje zaposlenih.
(h) if the company is managed on the basis of employee participation and if the national legislation of the host Member States does not impose such a scheme, information on the procedures whereby the arrangements for employee participation are determined.
Poročilo in načrt prenosa bi bilo treba delničarjem in zastopnikom zaposlenih v družbi predložiti, da ga preučijo v ustreznem času pred datumom skupščine delničarjev družbe.
The report and the transfer plan should be submitted to the shareholders and the employee representatives of the company for examination within an appropriate period prior to the date of the company's general meeting of shareholders.
Načrt prenosa bi moral biti objavljen v skladu z določbami Direktive 2009/101/ES
The transfer plan should be published in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2009/101/EC
Direktiva 2009/101/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o uskladitvi zaščitnih ukrepov za varovanje interesov družbenikov in tretjih oseb, ki jih države članice zahtevajo od gospodarskih družb v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 48 Pogodbe, zato da se oblikujejo zaščitni ukrepi z enakim učinkom v vsej Skupnosti (UL L 258, 1.10.2009, str.
Directive 2009/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on coordination of safeguards which, for the protection of the interests of members and third parties, are required by Member States of companies within the meaning of the second paragraph of Article 48 of the Treaty, with a view to making such safeguards equivalent (OJ L 258, 1.10.2009, p.
Priporočilo 4 (o odločitvi skupščine delničarjev)
Recommendation 4 ( on the decision by the meeting of shareholders )
Skupščina delničarjev bi morala odobriti predlog o prenosu v skladu s formalnimi zahtevami in večino, potrebno za spremembo memoranduma in akta o ustanovitvi, kot to predpisuje zakonodaja, ki velja za družbo v njeni matični državi članici.
The general meeting of shareholders should approve the transfer proposal in accordance with the formalities and by the majority required to amend the memorandum and articles of association under the legislation applicable to the company in its home Member State.
Države članice bi morale imeti možnost sprejeti predpise, ki bi bili oblikovani tako, da bi zagotavljali ustrezno zaščito manjšinskih delničarjev, ki nasprotujejo prenosu, na primer s pravico do izstopa iz družbe v skladu z zakonodajo, ki velja v matični državi članici.
Member States should be able to adopt provisions designed to ensure appropriate protection for minority shareholders who oppose a transfer, for example, the right to retire from the company, in accordance with the legislation applicable in its home Member State.
Priporočilo 5 (o preverjanju zakonitosti prenosa)
Recommendation 5 ( on the verification of the legality of the transfer )
Matična država članica bi morala v skladu s svojo zakonodajo preveriti zakonitost postopka.
The home Member State should verify the legality of the transfer procedure in accordance with its legislation.
Pristojni organi, ki jih določi matična država članica, bi morali izdati potrdilo, s katerim dokončno izjavijo, da so bili pred prenosom izpolnjeni vsi potrebni ukrepi in formalnosti.
The competent authority designated by the home Member State should issue a certificate conclusively declaring that all the acts and formalities required have been completed before the transfer.
Potrdilo, kopijo memoranduma in akta o ustanovitvi, ki sta predvidena za družbo v državi članici gostiteljici, ter kopijo predloga o prenosu bi bilo treba v ustreznem času predložiti organu, odgovornemu za registracijo v državi članici gostiteljici.
The certificate, a copy of the memorandum and articles of association envisaged for the company in the host Member State and a copy of the transfer proposal should be presented within an appropriate period of time to the body responsible for registration in the host Member State.
Ti dokumenti bi morali zadostovati, da se družbi omogoči registracija v državi članici gostiteljici.
Those documents should be sufficient to enable the company to be registered in the host Member State.
Organi, pristojni za registracijo v državi članici gostiteljici, bi morali preveriti, ali so izpolnjeni vsebinski in formalni pogoji za prenos, vključno z zahtevami, ki jih država članica gostiteljica predpisuje za oblikovanje takšne družbe.
The competent authority for registration in the host Member State should verify that the substantive and formal conditions for the transfer, including the requirements laid down in the host Member State for the formation of such company, are met.
Pristojni organ v državi članici gostiteljici bi moral o registraciji nemudoma obvestiti ustrezni organ v matični državi članici.
The competent authority in the host Member State should give immediate notification of the registration to the corresponding authority in the home Member State.
Organ v matični državi članici bi moral nato družbo odstraniti iz registra.
Thereupon, the home Member State authority should remove the company from the register.
Registracijo družbe v državi članici gostiteljici in njeno odstranitev iz registra v matični državi članici bi bilo treba ustrezno objaviti, da se zaščitijo tretje strani.
In order to protect third parties, the registration in the host Member State and the removal from the register in the home Member State should be adequately published.
Priporočilo 6 (o zaščitnih ukrepih)
Recommendation 6 ( on protective measures )
Družbi, zoper katero so bili vloženi postopki za prenehanje, likvidacijo, insolventnost ali odlog plačila ali drugi podobni postopki, se ne sme dovoliti, da bi svoj sedež prenesla čez mejo.
Any company against which proceedings for winding-up, liquidation, insolvency or suspension of payments or other similar proceedings have been brought should not be allowed to undertake a cross-border transfer of seat.
Za namene sodnih ali upravnih postopkov, ki še potekajo in so se začeli pred prenosom sedeža, bi moralo veljati, da ima družba registrirani sedež v matični državi članici.
For the purposes of ongoing judicial or administrative proceedings which commenced before the transfer of seat, the company should be regarded as having its registered office in the home Member State.
Obstoječi upniki bi morali imeti pravico do varščine.
Existing creditors should have the right to a security deposit.
Priporočilo 7 (o pravicah zaposlenih)
Recommendation 7 ( on employee s´ rights )
Skozi celoten prenos bi bilo treba ohranjati pravice zaposlenih do soodločanja.
The employees' participations rights should be preserved through the transfer.
Te pravice bi načeloma morala urejati zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice.
In principle, they should be governed by the legislation of the host Member State.
Zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice pa ne bi smela veljati v naslednjih primerih:
However, the legislation of the host Member State should not be applicable if:
(a) če ne zagotavlja vsaj enake ravni soodločanja, kot velja v matični državi članici, ali
(a) it does not provide for at least the same level of participation as that applicable in the home Member State, or
(b) če zaposlenim v poslovalnicah družbe, ki se nahajajo v drugih državah članicah, ne daje enakih pravic za izvrševanje pravice do soodločanja, kot so zanje veljale pred prenosom.
(b) it does not give employees of establishments of the company situated in other Member States the same entitlement to exercise participation rights as they enjoy before the transfer.
o štirinajsti direktivi na področju prava družb o prenosu sedeža družbe
on a 14th company law directive on the cross-border transfer of company seats
Pripravljavec mnenja: Philippe Boulland
Rapporteur: Philippe Boulland
Odbor za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve kot pristojni odbor:
The Committee on Employment and Social Affairs calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs, as the committee responsible:
– naj v predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
– to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
A. ker ocena vpliva Komisije iz leta 2007 razen soodločanja delavcev ne vključuje posledic za socialne politike in politike zaposlovanja;
A. whereas the Commission’s 2007 impact assessment does not cover the implications for social and employment policies, apart from the involvement of employees;
B. ker je v Statutu evropske družbe in Statutu evropske zadruge predviden prenos sedeža ob upoštevanju posebnih zavezujočih pravil glede udeležbe delavcev na podlagi Direktive 2001/86/ES in ker je v največji možni meri treba ohraniti skladnost in učinkovitost postopkov soodločanja delavcev iz evropskih direktiv o pravu družb;
B. whereas the Statute for a European Company and the Statute for a European Cooperative Society provide for the transfer of company seats in accordance with specific, binding rules on the involvement of employees, in line with Directive 2001/86/EC, and whereas the employee participation procedures laid down in European company law directives must be as coherent and effective as possible;
C. ker je Sodišče v primerih Daily Mail
C. whereas the Court of Justice has adopted certain approaches towards freedom of establishment of undertakings, in the Daily Mail
sodba z dne 27. septembra 1988, zadeva 81/87, Daily Mail, [1988] Recueil 5483 , Centros
Judgment of 27 September 1988 in Case 81/87 Daily Mail [1988] ECR 5483. , Centros
sodba z dne 9. marca 1999 v zadevi C-212/97 [1999] Recueil I-1459 , Überseering
Judgment of 9 March 1999 in Case C-212/97 Centros [1999] ECR I-1459. , Überseering
sodba z dne 5. novembra 2002 v zadevi C-208/00 [2002] Recueil I-9919 in Cartesio
Judgment of 5 November 2002 in Case C-208/00 Überseering [2002] ECR I-9919. and Cartesio
2. je naklonjen evropski zakonodaji o prenosu sedeža, če ne bo ogrozila uresničevanja ciljev člena 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije niti omejila pravice delavcev do soodločanja;
Is in favour of EU legislation on the transfer of company seats, provided that this does not jeopardise the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union or restrict the right of involvement of employees;
6. spodbuja države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bo zakonitost prenosov spremljal pristojni organ, ki še posebej razsoja o spoštovanju obveznosti vseh zainteresiranih strani;
Encourages Member States to arrange for the legality of transfers to be monitored by a competent authority which, in particular, adjudicates on compliance with the obligations of all stakeholders;
8. poziva, naj Direktiva 2001/86/ES postane glavna pravna podlaga za prenos sedeža ob upoštevanju določb delovnega prava;
Calls for Directive 2001/86/EC to become the main legal basis for transfers of seat, bearing in mind the provisions of labour law;
– da v svojo prilogo k predlogu resolucije vključi naslednja priporočila:
– to include the following recommendations in the annex to its motion for a resolution:
Priporočilo št. 1: Komisija naj najpozneje hkrati z objavo predloga štirinajste direktive o pravu družb objavi študijo učinka glede posledic direktive o prenosu sedeža z vidika uresničevanja ciljev člena 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Recommendation 1: the Commission should submit an impact assessment covering the implications of a directive on the transfer of company seats as regards the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 9 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; that impact assessment should be published, at the latest, at the same time as the proposal for a 14th company law directive;
Priporočilo št. 2: zakonodaja EU o prenosu statutarnega sedeža družb mora vključevati spodaj navedene elemente, da se tako zagotovi pravica do udeležbe in kohezija delavcev ter, zaradi učinkovitosti in pravne varnosti, ohranjanje varstva in jamstev, podeljenih njihovim zastopnikom med prenosom in po njem:
Recommendation 2: EU legislation on the transfer of the registered office of a company or firm must include the following elements in order to guarantee the right of participation and the cohesion of employees , and must retain the protection and guarantees afforded to their representatives, during and after the transfer, for reasons of efficiency and legal certainty:
– pravni sistem glede pravice delavcev do soodločanja, v skladu s tistim iz Direktive 2001/86/ES glede udeležbe delavcev, zlasti v primeru ustanovitve družbe s preoblikovanjem, da se pri uporabi evropskih direktiv o pravu družb zagotovi skladnost postopkov udeležbe delavcev;
- legislative provisions on the right of involvement of employees should be in line with those set out in Directive 2001/86/EC regarding the involvement of employees, particularly where a company or firm is established by means of transformation, in order to ensure the coherence of employee participation procedures in connection with the application of European company law directives;
– poleg tega se upravni organ z delničarji in delavci posvetuje o pravnih in gospodarskih posledicah prenosa, in sicer tako, da sestavi poročilo, v katerem celovito navede in utemelji posledice za delničarje in delavce in ki ga mora predložiti pravočasno in vsaj mesec dni, preden se skupščina delničarjev dokončno izreče o odobritvi predloga prenosa; podrobnosti o posvetovanju o poročilu, vključno z načrtom prenosa, morajo biti brezplačno dostopne vsem zaposlenim in njihovim zastopnikom;
- in addition, the management body should consult shareholders and employees about the legal and economic implications of the transfer by means of a report fully setting out and justifying the consequences for shareholders and employees, presented in good time and at least one month before the general meeting definitively decides whether or not to approve the proposed transfer; particulars of the consultation on the report, including the transfer plan, must be accessible free of charge for all workers and their representatives;
– pravice in obveznosti družbe glede pogojev zaposlovanja, ki izhajajo iz zakonodaje, prakse in individualnih pogodb o zaposlitvi ali zaposlitvenih razmerij v prvotni državi članici, pa tudi dejavnosti organov, ki zastopajo zaposlene, ostanejo v veljavi tudi med prenosom sedeža in po registraciji v državi članici gostiteljici;
- the company’s rights and obligations – deriving from legislation, accepted practice and individual employment contracts or employment relationships – in respect of working conditions in the home Member State , as well as the activities of the bodies representing workers, should continue to apply during the transfer of the seat and following its registration in the host Member State;
– če je treba zaradi prenosa spremeniti strukturo družbe, sprejeme glavno poslovodstvo na lastno pobudo ali pisno zahtevo določenega števila zaposlenih, ki ga določijo socialni partnerji, sklep, da se spremeni sestava organov, ki zastopajo zaposlene;
- if the transfer entails a change in the structure of the company or firm, central management should – on its own initiative or in response to a written request by a number of workers decided by the social partners – take a decision to alter the composition of the bodies representing workers;
– če so kolektivni odpusti zaradi prenosa sedeža neizogibni, se uporabijo določbe Direktive 98/59/ES;
- where collective redundancies are inevitable as a result of the transfer of a company’s seat, the provisions of Directive 98/59/EC should apply;
– podjetje mora pred prenosom sedeža dokazati, da upošteva določbe o pravicah delavcev;
- the transfer of a company’s seat should be subject to its ability to demonstrate compliance with the provisions on employees’ rights;
– države članice za delavce in njihove zastopnike predvidijo učinkovito pravno sredstvo z odložilnim učinkom glede prenosa sedeža, s čimer se zagotovi, da delodajalci, ki ne upoštevajo svojih obveznosti do delavcev na državni in evropski ravni, te izpolnijo;
- the Member States should provide for effective legal remedies, with suspensive effect in relation to the transfer of the seat, for employees and their representatives so that employers can be forced to discharge their obligations at national and European level towards employees should they fail to do so;
– uporablja se zakonodaja države članice gostiteljice, razen če je z njenimi zakoni določena nižja raven soodločanja delavcev.
- the legislation of the host Member State should apply, except where it specifically provides for a lower level of employee involvement and joint decision-making.
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, Milan Cabrnoch, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Tadeusz Cymański, Frédéric Daerden, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Richard Falbr, Ilda Figueiredo, Marian Harkin, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Patrick Le Hyaric, Veronica Lope Fontagné, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck, Traian Ungureanu
o sodnem sistemu za patentne spore
on jurisdictional system for patent disputes
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................11
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............11
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2011/167/EU z dne 10. marca 2011 o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva
– having regard to the Council Decision 2011/167/EU of 10 March 2011 authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection
UL L 76, 22.3.2011, str.
OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p.53. ,
– ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva v zvezi z veljavno ureditvijo prevajanja ( COM(2011)0216 ),
– having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements ( COM(2011)0216 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Sodišča EU št. 1/09 z dne 8. marca 2011
– having regard to Opinion 1/09 of the Court of Justice of 8 March 2011
UL L 211, 16.7.2011, str.
OJ L 211, 16.7.2011, p.2. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko in Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0009/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs( A7-0009/2012 ),
A. ker je učinkovit patentni sistem v Evropi nujen pogoj za spodbujanje rasti prek inovacij in za pomoč evropskim podjetjem, zlasti malim in srednjim podjetjem (MSP), pri soočanju z gospodarsko krizo in mednarodno konkurenco;
A. whereas an efficient patent system in Europe is a necessary prerequisite for boosting growth through innovation and to help European business, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), to face the economic crisis and global competition;
B. ker so bili v skladu s Sklepom Sveta 2011/167/EU o odobritvi okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva Belgija, Bolgarija, Češka, Danska, Nemčija, Estonija, Grčija, Francija, Irska, Ciper, Latvija, Litva, Luksemburg, Madžarska, Malta, Nizozemska, Avstrija, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija, Slovenija, Slovaška, Finska, Švedska in Združeno kraljestvo pooblaščeni, da med seboj vzpostavijo okrepljeno sodelovanje na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva z uporabo ustreznih določb iz Pogodb;
B. whereas pursuant to Council Decision 2011/167/EU authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Estonia, Ireland, Greece, France, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom were authorised to establish enhanced cooperation between themselves in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection, by applying the relevant provisions of the Treaties;
C. ker je 13. aprila 2011 na podlagi sklepa o odobritvi Sveta Komisija sprejela predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva in predlog uredbe Sveta o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva v zvezi z veljavno ureditvijo prevajanja;
C. whereas on 13 April 2011, on the basis of the Council’s authorising Decision, the Commission adopted a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection, and a proposal for a Council Regulation implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements;
D. ker je 8. marca 2011 Sodišče Evropske unije izdalo mnenje o predlogu Sodišča za evropske patente in patente Skupnosti in opozorilo na njegovo nezdružljivost z zakonodajo Unije;
D. whereas on 8 March 2011 the Court of Justice gave its opinion on the European and Community Patents Court proposal raising the point of its incompatibility with Union law;
E. ker je mogoče učinkovito enotno patentno varstvo zagotoviti samo z delujočim sistemom reševanja patentnih sporov;
E. whereas effective unitary patent protection can only be ensured through a functioning patent litigation system;
F. ker so se po objavi mnenja Sodišča Evropske unije države članice, ki sodelujejo v okrepljenem sodelovanju, zavzele za vzpostavitev enotnega sodišča za reševanje patentnih sporov z mednarodnim sporazumom;
F. whereas, following the opinion of the Court of Justice, the Member States participating in the enhanced cooperation engaged in the creation of a Unified Patent Litigation Court by means of an international agreement;