natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je svoboda opravljanja storitev eden od temeljev evropskega projekta; vendar meni, da bi bilo treba na eni strani upoštevati temeljne pravice in socialne cilje iz Pogodb ter na drugi pravico javnosti in socialnih partnerjev, da zagotovijo nediskriminacijo in enako obravnavanje ter izboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih pogojev; opozarja, da sta kolektivno pogajanje in ukrepanje temeljni pravici, ki sta priznani tudi v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, ter da je enako obravnavanje temeljno načelo Evropske unije;
Emphasises that freedom to provide services is one of the cornerstones of the European project; considers however, this should be balanced, on the one hand, against fundamental rights and the social objectives set out in the Treaties and on the other hand, against the right of the public and social partners to ensure non-discrimination, equal treatment, and the improvement of living and working conditions; recalls that collective bargaining and collective action are fundamental rights that are recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and that equal treatment is a fundamental principle of the European Union;
meni, da bi moral vsak državljan Unije imeti pravico, da dela kjer koli v Evropski uniji in s tem pravico do enakega obravnavanja; zato obžaluje, da se ta pravica ne uporablja enotno po vsej Uniji; meni, da mora prehodno ureditev, ki še velja, natančno pregledati Komisija, da oceni, ali je dejansko potrebna za preprečevanje izkrivljanja nacionalnih trgov dela, in jo čim prej odpraviti, če ugotovi, da za to ni potrebna;
Is of the opinion that any EU citizen should have the right to work anywhere in the European Union and thus should have a right to equal treatment; therefore regrets that this right is not applied uniformly across the EU; is of the view that transitional arrangements remaining in place should be subject to rigorous review by the Commission, to assess whether they are truly necessary to prevent distortions in national labour markets and, that where that is not found to be the case, they should be removed as quickly as possible;
poudarja, da svoboda opravljanja storitev ni v nasprotju s temeljnimi pravicami socialnih partnerjev do spodbujanja socialnega dialoga ter jim ni nadrejena, zlasti ker je to ustavna pravica v več državah članicah; poudarja, da je bil namen Montijeve klavzule zaščititi temeljne ustavne pravice v okviru notranjega trga; hkrati opozarja, da je prost pretok delavcev ena od štirih svoboščin notranjega trga;
Emphasises that freedom to provide services does not contradict and is not superior to the fundamental right of social partners to promote social dialogue and to take industrial action, in particular since this is a constitutional right in several Member States; stresses that the intention of the Monti clause was to protect fundamental constitutional rights in the context of the internal market; recalls at the same time that free movement of workers is one of the four freedoms of the internal market;
pozdravlja Lizbonsko pogodbo in dejstvo, da bo Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah postala pravno zavezujoča; ugotavlja, da bi to vključevalo pravico sindikatov, da se pogajajo in sklepajo kolektivne pogodbe na ustreznih ravneh, v primeru nasprotja interesov pa pravico do kolektivnih ukrepov (na primer stavke) za obrambo svojih interesov;
Welcomes the Lisbon Treaty and the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is to be made legally binding; notes that this would include the right of trade unions to negotiate and conclude collective agreements at the appropriate levels and, in the case of conflicts of interest, to take collective action (such as strike action) to defend their interests;
poudarja, da direktiva o napotitvi delavcev omogoča, da javni organi in socialni partnerji določijo za delavce ugodnejše pogoje za delo in zaposlitev v skladu z različnimi tradicijami držav članic;
Stresses that the PWD allows public authorities and social partners to lay down terms and conditions of employment which are more favourable to workers according to the different traditions in the Member States;
poudarja, da je v uvodni izjavi 22 direktive o napotitvi delavcev navedeno, da direktiva ne vpliva na zakonodajo držav članic v zvezi s kolektivnim ukrepanjem za obrambo poklicnih interesov, kar potrjuje člen 137(5) Pogodbe ES;
Stresses that recital 22 of the PWD states that the Directive is without prejudice to the law of the Member States concerning collective action to defend the interests of trades and professions which is confirmed by Article 137(5) of the EC Treaty;
zato poudarja potrebo po varstvu in krepitvi enakega obravnavanja, enakega plačila za enako delo za enako delovno mesto, kot je določeno v členih 39 in 12 Pogodbe ES; meni, da v okviru svobode opravljanja storitev ali svobode ustanavljanja z državljanstvom delodajalca, delavcev ali napotenih delavcev ni mogoče utemeljiti neenakosti glede delovnih pogojev, plače ali uveljavljanja temeljnih pravic, kot je pravica do stavke;
Emphasises therefore the need to safeguard and to strengthen equal treatment and equal pay for equal work in the same workplace as laid down in Articles 39 and 12 of the EC Treaty; considers that in the framework of freedom to provide services or freedom of establishment, the nationality of the employer, or of employees or posted workers cannot justify inequalities concerning working conditions, pay or the exercise of fundamental rights such as the right to strike;
poudarja, da je treba preprečiti negativen vpliv na modele trga dela, ki že lahko združujejo veliko stopnjo prožnosti na trgu dela z visoko ravnijo varnosti, ter nadalje spodbujati ta pristop;
Underlines the importance of preventing negative effects on labour market models that are already able to combine a high degree of flexibility in the labour market with a high level of security and, instead, of promoting this approach further;
ugotavlja, da je horizontalni učinek nekaterih določb Pogodbe ES odvisen od tega, ali so izpolnjeni natančni pogoji, med drugim, da take določbe dajejo pravice posamezniku, ki ima interes v skladu s tako določenimi obveznostmi; izraža zaskrbljenost nad tem, ali je bil horizontalni učinek člena 43 Pogodbe ES ustrezno opredeljen v posebnih okoliščinah sodbah, o katerih je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti nedavno razsodilo, in meni, da bi se zaradi tega lahko povečalo število zadev pred tem sodiščem;
Notes that the horizontal effect of certain provisions of the EC Treaty depends on precise conditions being fulfilled, inter alia the condition that those provisions confer rights on an individual who has an interest in compliance with the obligations concerned; expresses its concern that, in the specific circumstances of the judgements recently given by the ECJ, the horizontal effect of Article 43 of the EC Treaty was duly identified, and considers that this might result in more cases before the ECJ;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so po načelih in tradicijah Evropske unije mnoge države članice v sodelovanju s socialnimi partnerji uvedle visoke standarde za delovne pogoje, ki izboljšujejo dobrobit vseh delavcev in večajo gospodarsko rast in konkurenčnost;
Welcomes the fact that, according to the principles and traditions of the European Union, many Member States, in cooperation with social partners, have put in place high standards of working conditions that improve the well-being of all workers and enhance economic growth as well as competitiveness;
meni, da je namen zakonodajalca iz direktive o napotitvi delavcev in direktive o storitvah nezdružljiv z razlagami, ki bi spodbujale nelojalno konkurenco med podjetji; ugotavlja, da bi podjetja, ki podpišejo in izpolnjujejo kolektivne pogodbe, utegnila biti v primerjavi s tistimi, ki tega nočejo storiti, v manj ugodnem konkurenčnem položaju;
Believes that the intention of the legislator in the PWD and Services Directive is incompatible with interpretations which may invite unfair competition between undertakings; notes that undertakings that sign and follow collective agreements could have a competitive disadvantage over undertakings that refuse to do so;
meni, da sta pravilna uporaba in izvajanje določb direktive o napotitvi delavcev nujna, da se zagotovi doseganje njenih ciljev, zlasti za poenostavitev zagotavljanja storitev ob zagotavljanju ustreznega varstva delavcev, in da se v celoti spoštujejo veljavne ureditve kolektivnih pogajanj v državah članicah, v katere so napoteni delavci v okviru navedene direktive;
Considers that correct application and enforcement of the provisions of the PWD are essential to secure the attainment of its objectives, namely to facilitate the provision of services while guaranteeing the appropriate protection of workers, and to fully respect collective bargaining arrangements existing in the Member States to which workers are posted within the framework of that Directive;
meni tudi, da se svoboda zagotavljanja čezmejnih storitev na notranjem trgu poveča, če se zagotovi, da se domači in tuji ponudniki storitev pomerijo v enakih gospodarskih razmerah in pogojih na trgu dela na kraju opravljanja storitev;
Also takes the view that the freedom to provide cross border services in the internal market is further enhanced by ensuring that domestic and foreign service providers face similar economic and labour market conditions at the place of service delivery;
dejavno spodbuja konkurenčnost na podlagi znanja in inovacij, kot je določeno v Lizbonski strategiji;
Actively promotes competitiveness on the basis of knowledge and innovation as laid down in the Lisbon Strategy;
ima pomisleke o uvedbi načela sorazmernosti za ukrepe proti podjetjem, ki pri zanašanju na pravico do ustanavljanja ali opravljanja storitev v tujini namenoma spodkopavajo pogoje za delo in zaposlitev; meni, da o uporabi kolektivnih ukrepov za uveljavitev enakega obravnavanja in zagotovitev dostojnih delovnih pogojev ne bi smelo biti nobenega dvoma;
Questions the introduction of a proportionality principle for actions against undertakings which, by relying on the right of establishment or the right to provide services across borders, deliberately undercut terms and conditions of employment; considers that there should be no question as to the use of industrial action to uphold equal treatment and to secure decent working conditions;
poudarja, da podjetja temeljnih svoboščin Evropske unije ne morejo razlagati kot pravice podjetij, da se izognejo ali zaobidejo nacionalne zakone in prakse na področju sociale in zaposlovanja, kakor tudi ne za nelojalno konkuriranje glede plač in delovnih pogojev; zato meni, da morajo biti čezmejni ukrepi podjetij, ki lahko spodkopljejo pogoje za delo in zaposlitev v državi gostiteljici, sorazmerni in se ne smejo samodejno utemeljevati z določbami Pogodbe ES, na primer o prostem pretoku storitev ali svobodi ustanavljanja;
Emphasises that the EU's economic freedoms cannot be interpreted as granting undertakings the right to evade or circumvent national social and employment laws and practices, or to impose unfair competition on wages and working conditions; considers therefore that cross border actions of undertakings which may undercut terms and conditions of employment in the host country must be proportionate and cannot automatically be justified by the EC Treaty provisions on, for example, free movement of services or freedom of establishment;
poudarja, da mora pravo Skupnosti spoštovati načelo nediskriminacije; poleg tega še naprej poudarja, da mora zakonodajalec Skupnosti zagotoviti, da se ne ustvarjajo ovire za kolektivne sporazume, na primer za tiste o zagotavljanju enakega plačila za enako delo vseh delavcev na delovnem mestu, ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo ali državljanstvo njihovega delodajalca, v kraju, kjer se opravlja storitev, ali ovire za kolektivno ukrepanje v podporo takšnemu sporazumu, ki je v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo in prakso;
Emphasises that Community law has to respect the principle of non discrimination; emphasises further that the Community legislator has to ensure that no obstacles are created either to collective agreements, for example, those implementing the principle of equal pay for equal work for all workers in the workplace, regardless of their nationality or that of their employer, in the place where the service is provided, or to industrial action in support of such an agreement which is in accordance with national laws or practice;
ugotavlja, da socialni vidiki iz členov 26 in 27 direktive o javnih naročilih državam članicam omogočajo, da ustvarijo pravične konkurenčne pogoje z določitvijo pogojev za delo in zaposlitev, ki bi presegali obvezne predpise za minimalno varstvo;
Notes that the social considerations referred to in Articles 26 and 27 of the Public Procurement Directive enable the Member States to create fair competition conditions by laying down terms and conditions of employment which go beyond the mandatory rules for minimum protection;
meni, da se zaradi omejene pravne podlage za prost pretok v direktivi o napotitvi delavcev ta direktiva utegne razlagati kot jasno povabilo k nelojalni konkurenci glede plač in delovnih pogojev; zato meni, da bi se pravna podlaga direktive o napotitvi delavcev zato lahko razširila, da bi vključevala sklicevanje na prost pretok delavcev;
Is of the opinion that the limited legal basis of free movement of the PWD may lead to the PWD being interpreted as an express invitation to unfair competition concerning wages and working conditions; therefore considers that the legal basis of the PWD could be broadened to include a reference to the free movement of workers;
poudarja, da bi sedanje razmere lahko povzročile, da bi bili delavci v državi gostiteljici pod pritiskom zaradi konkurence za nizke plače; zato meni, da je treba zagotoviti dosledno izvajanje direktive o napotitvi delavcev v vseh državah članicah;
Emphasises that the current situation might as a result lead to workers in host countries feeling pressured by low wage competition; considers therefore that consistent implementation of the PWD must be ensured in all Member States;
opozarja, da je devet držav članic ratificiralo konvencijo št. 94 Mednarodne organizacije dela; obžaluje, da celo odločitve sodišč ne upoštevajo dovolj konvencije št. 94 Mednarodne organizacije dela ter je zaskrbljen, da bi bila uporaba te konvencije v zadevnih državah članicah lahko v nasprotju z uporabo direktive o napotitvi delavcev; poziva Komisijo, naj nujno pojasni te razmere in še naprej spodbuja ratifikacijo te konvencije, da bi še bolj spodbudila uvedbo socialnih določb v predpisih o javnem naročilih, kar je samo po sebi cilj direktive o javnih naročilih;
Recalls that nine Member States have ratified ILO Convention 94; regrets that even judicial rulings fail sufficiently to take into consideration ILO convention 94 and is worried that the application of this Convention in the Member States concerned might be in conflict with the application of the PWD; calls on the Commission to clarify this situation as a matter of urgency and to continue to promote the ratification of this Convention in order to enhance further the development of social clauses in public procurement regulations, which itself is an aim of the Public Procurement Directive;
ugotavlja, da ni bilo dokazano, da je mogoče v skladu s konvencijama Mednarodne organizacije dela št. 87 in 98 omejitve pravice do sindikalnega ukrepanja ter temeljnih pravic upravičiti le na podlagi zdravja, javnega reda in drugih podobnih dejavnikov;
Notes that it has not been recognised that, under the ILO conventions 87 and 98, restrictions on the right to industrial action and fundamental rights can only be justified on grounds of health, public order and other similar factors;
poziva vse države članice, naj pravilno izvajajo direktivo o napotitvi delavcev; poleg tega poudarja, da so države članice in socialni partnerji pristojni za zakonodajo za trg dela ter pravila v zvezi s pogajanji in kolektivnimi pogodbami; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je naloga držav članic izboljšati in v celoti uporabljati ukrepe za preprečevanje, spremljanje in izvrševanje, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti;
Calls on all Member States properly to enforce the PWD; further emphasises that labour market legislation and rules concerning negotiations and collective agreements are the competence of Member States and social partners; points out, in this respect, that it is the task of the Member States to improve and to make full use of prevention, monitoring and enforcement measures, in conformity with the subsidiarity principle;
meni, da v sedanji zakonodaji Skupnosti obstajajo tako vrzeli kot nedoslednosti ter je bila zato direktiva o napotitvi delavcev razlagana drugače, kot je bil namen zakonodajalca Skupnosti, ki je poskušal poiskati pravično ravnotežje med svobodo zagotavljanja storitev in varstvom pravic delavcev; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi potrebne zakonodajne predloge, ki bi pripomogli k temu, da si razlage v prihodnje ne bi nasprotovale;
Considers that current Community legislation has both loopholes and inconsistencies and therefore may have lent itself to interpretations of the PWD that were not the intention of the Community legislator, who was looking for a fair balance between the freedom to provide services and the protection of workers rights; calls on the Commission to prepare the necessary legislative proposals which would assist in preventing conflicting interpretation in the future;
zato pozdravlja izjavo Komisije z dne 3. aprila 2008, v kateri se je zavzela, da se bo še naprej spoprijemala s konkurenco na podlagi nizkega socialnega standarda, pa tudi poudarila, da svoboda zagotavljanja storitev ni v nasprotju in nikakor ni pomembnejša od temeljne pravice do stavke in včlanitve v sindikat; spodbuja nemudno izvajanje sklepov Sveta z 9. junija 2008 za odpravo pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju, preprečevanje prihodnjih težavnih razmer in zlorab ter ustvarjanje zaželenega vzdušja medsebojnega zaupanja; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo tesno sodelovanje med državami članicami, nacionalnimi organi in Komisijo v zvezi s spremljanjem in izmenjavo zgledov najboljše prakse; meni, da bi bil to učinkovit način za boj proti zlorabi;
Therefore welcomes the statement of 3 April 2008 in which the Commission committed itself not only to continue to tackle competition that is based on low social standards but also emphasised that freedom to provide services does not contradict and is not in any way superior to the fundamental right to strike, and to join a trade union; encourages the implementation of the Council Conclusions of 9 June 2008 without delay to remedy shortcomings in the implementation, to prevent further problematic situations and abuses and to create the desired climate of mutual trust and confidence; calls on the Commission and the Members States to foster closer cooperation between the Members States, national authorities and the Commission with regard to monitoring and the exchange of best practice; considers that this would be an effective way to combat misuse;
ugotavlja, kako pomembno je, da so pravila o trgu dela EU pregledna in enaka za vse, pa tudi, da različne politične tradicije zelo otežujejo dosego enotnega modela trga dela; zato meni, da bi bilo treba izvesti podrobno presojo vplivov zgoraj navedenih sodb na nacionalni ravni in ob posvetovanju s socialnimi partnerji, kadar posamezne države članice to posebej zadeva;
Notes that it is important that the rules on the EU labour market are transparent and equivalent for all, but also that different political traditions make it very difficult to achieve a single labour market model; therefore considers that, where certain Member States are particularly affected, a detailed impact assessment of the above-mentioned judgments should be carried out at national level in consultation with the social partners;
pozdravlja naznanitev Komisije, da je sedaj pripravljena ponovno pregledati vpliv notranjega trga na pravice delavcev in kolektivno pogajanje;
Welcomes the Commission's indication that it is now ready to re-examine the impact of the internal market on labour rights and collective bargaining;
predlaga, naj pri tem opravi tudi delni pregled direktive o napotitvi delavcev; meni, da bi bilo treba pregled te direktive opraviti po natančni analizi dejanskih izzivov različnih modelov kolektivnih pogodb na nacionalni ravni; meni tudi, da bi bilo treba pri pregledu, če se to šteje za koristno, še posebej obravnavati vprašanja, kot so veljavni delovni pogoji, višina plač, načelo enakega obravnavanja delavcev v okviru prostega pretoka storitev, spoštovanje različnih modelov dela in trajanje napotitve na delo;
Suggests that this should not exclude a partial review of the PWD; considers that any review of that Directive should be done after a thorough analysis at national level of the actual challenges to the different models of collective agreement, and that the review, if deemed useful, should deal in particular with issues such as applicable working conditions, pay levels, the principle of equal treatment of workers in the context of free movement of services, respect for different labour models and the duration of posting;
meni, da ne bi smeli ogroziti uveljavljanja temeljnih pravic, kot jih priznavajo države članice, konvencije Mednarodne organizacije dela in Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, vključno s pravico do pogajanja, sklepanja in izvajanja kolektivnih pogodb ter pravica do kolektivnih ukrepov;
Believes that the exercise of fundamental rights as recognised in the Member States, in ILO Conventions and in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, including the right to negotiate, conclude and enforce collective agreements and the right to take industrial action should not be put at risk;
poudarja, da mora biti povsem jasno, da direktiva o napotitvi delavcev in druge direktive ne prepovedujejo državam članicam in socialnim partnerjem, da bi zahtevali ugodnejše pogoje za enako obravnavanje delavcev, ter da obstajajo jamstva, da je zakonodajo Skupnosti mogoče izvajati na podlagi vseh obstoječih modelov trga dela;
Emphasises that it must be made absolutely clear that the PWD and other directives do not prohibit Member States and social partners from demanding more favourable conditions, aimed at equal treatment of workers, and that there are assurances that Community legislation can be implemented on the basis of all the existing labour market models;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja sklepe Sveta v zvezi za čimprejšnjo uvedbo elektronskega sistema za izmenjavo informacij, saj bi to državam članicam omogočilo, da bi se učinkoviteje borile proti zlorabam;
Calls on the Commission to implement the decisions of the Council regarding the establishment of an electronic system for exchange of information as a matter of urgency as it could enable Member States to combat abuses more effectively;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj sprejmejo ukrepe za boj proti zlorabam, zlasti v zvezi z dejavnostmi tistih "podjetij – poštnih nabiralnikov" (angl. letterbox companies), ki v resnici ne opravljajo pravih in učinkovitih dejavnosti v državi sedeža, ampak so bila ustanovljena – včasih jih celo neposredno ustanovi glavni izvajalec v državi gostiteljici – zgolj za poslovanje v državi gostiteljici, da bi zaobšla polno izpolnjevanje pravil in predpisov te države, zlasti kar zadeva plače in delovne pogoje; poziva Komisijo, naj v pravilniku za podjetja v okviru direktive o storitvah določi jasna pravila za boj proti "podjetjem – poštnim nabiralnikom";
Asks the Member States and the Commission to adopt measures to combat abuses, in particular regarding activities of those "letterbox-companies" which are not engaged in any genuine and effective business in the country of establishment but which have been created, sometimes even directly by the main contractor in the host country, for the sole purpose of carrying out business in the host country, in order to circumvent the full application of host country rules and regulations in particular with regard to wages and working conditions ; calls on the Commission to lay down clear rules to combat "letterbox companies" in its code of conduct for undertakings under the Services Directive;