natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
- sproženje osveščevalne kampanje, namenjene državljanom, o pojavu nasilja nad ženskami in širjenje ustreznih informacij za spoštovanje zdravja in fizične integritete žensk;
- an awareness-raising campaign be promoted on violence against women and appropriate information be disseminated to ensure respect for the health and physical integrity of women,
- vključitev v vseh državah članicah prakse spolnih pohabljanj žensk v kazensko zakonodajo kot obremenilne okoliščine kaznivega dejanja namernih osebnih poškodb.
- in all the Member States the practice of sexually mutilating women be included in criminal law as an aggravating factor in the offence of grievous bodily harm.
ki ga vlaga Stefano Zappalà
by Stefano Zappalà
v zvezi s preprečevanjem in bojem proti financiranju terorizma s pomočjo ukrepov za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij, krepitev preglednosti in povečanje sledljivosti finančnih transakcij
on preventing and combating the financing of terrorism through measures to improve exchanges of information, transparency and the traceability of financial transactions
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu v zvezi s preprečevanjem in bojem proti financiranju terorizma s pomočjo ukrepov za izboljšanje izmenjave informacij, krepitev preglednosti in povečanje sledljivosti finančnih transakcij
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on preventing and combating the financing of terrorism through measures to improve exchanges of information, transparency and the traceability of financial transactions
ob upoštevanju deklaracije o boju proti terorizmu, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju 24. in 25. marca 2004,
having regard to the declaration on combating terrorism, adopted at the European Council meeting of 24 and 25 March 2004,
ob upoštevanju spremenjenega akcijskega načrta Evropske unije proti terorizmu, ki ga je Evropski svet sprejel na zasedanju 17. in 18. junija 2004,
having regard to the European Union's revised plan of action against terrorism, adopted at the European Council meeting of 17 and 18 June 2004,
ob upoštevanju ukrepov za preprečevanje in zatiranje terorizma iz Haaškega programa, sprejetih na zasedanju Evropskega sveta 4. in 5. novembra 2004 in dopolnjenih s sklepi predsedstva Evropskega sveta z dne 16. in 17. decembra 2004, še posebej tistih o terorizmu,
having regard to the set of measures for the prevention and suppression of terrorism provided for in the Hague Programme, which was adopted at the European Council meeting of 4 and 5 November 2004, supplemented by the conclusions of the Presidency of the European Council of 16 and 17 December 2004, in particular those relating to terrorism,
ob upoštevanju direktive o uporabi finančnega sistema za pranje denarja, vključno z namenom financiranja terorizma,
having regard to the Directive on the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering, including terrorist financing,
ker je treba hitro izvesti tiste ukrepe iz Haaškega programa, ki zadevajo boj proti financiranju terorizma, še posebej posredovanje podatkov, da bi na ta način okrepili svobodo, varnost in pravico v Evropski uniji,
whereas the measures referred to in the Hague Programme which are relevant to the fight against terrorist financing, in particular as regards information, should be implemented rapidly, in order to strengthen freedom, security and justice in the European Union,
ker evropska varnostna strategija poziva k zoperstavljanju novim grožnjam s političnimi, diplomatskimi, človekoljubnimi, gospodarskimi in finančnimi ukrepi, dejavnostjo policije in sodstva ter vojaškim delovanjem,
whereas the European security strategy calls for action to be taken against threats through political, diplomatic, humanitarian, economic and financial measures and through police, judicial and military activities,
ker se je izkazalo, da so teroristi zelo iznajdljivi glede načinov pridobivanja denarja in uporabe novih sistemov za zbiranje sredstev, zlasti v zvezi tihotapskimi mrežami, posebnimi sistemi za prenos sredstev (npr. sistem hawala) in izrabo človekoljubnih združenj v ta namen,
whereas terrorists have shown considerable creativity in the way they transfer money and use new systems to collect money, in particular cash couriers, money remittance systems such as Hawala and transfers through charitable organisations,
ker v boju proti financiranju terorizma izmenjava podatkov predstavlja učinkovit način njegovega onemogočanja,
whereas the exchange of information is an effective means of combating terrorist financing,
a) potrebno je določiti merila izmenjave podatkov in imenovati odgovorno osebo, ki bo skrbela za evropski sistem informacijske tehnologije kot obliko pomoči obveščevalnim službam Unije pri izmenjavi podatkov in "vzpostavljanju mrež",
a) that it establish intelligence-sharing standards and a person responsible at European level for information technologies in order to help EU intelligence services to share information and 'establish networks',
b) potrebno je takojšnje sprejetje tretje direktive o pranju denarja,
b) that it adopt the third Directive on money laundering without delay,
d) oklevajoče države je potrebno pozvati, da ratificirajo protokol h konvenciji iz leta 2000 o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah in konvencijo Združenih narodov o zatiranju financiranja terorizma; poskrbeti je potrebno zato, da se v nacionalne zakonodaje preneseta sklep o boju proti terorizmu in sklep Eurojusta z dne 28. februarja 2002,
d) that it ask those countries with reservations to ratify the Protocol to the 2000 Convention on mutual assistance in criminal matters and the United Nations Convention on the suppression of the financing of terrorism, and to transpose the decision on combating terrorism and the Eurojust decision of 28 February 2002,
e) pripravi se študija o oceni prizadevanj za omejitev mednarodnega financiranja terorizma; tovrstna prizadevanja se stopnjujejo,
e) that it call for an evaluation study of efforts to reduce the international financing of terrorism and how to improve these efforts;
o opredelitvi pojma "odpadki"
on the definition of the concept of ‘waste’
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o opredelitvi pojma "odpadki"
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the definition of the concept of ‘waste’
ker se v splošnem pomenu označuje s pojmom odpadki vse, kar ostane v trdni, tekoči ali plinasti obliki po prvotni uporabi,
whereas the commonly accepted meaning of the term ‘waste’ is everything that remains as a solid, liquid or gas residue after the primary use of a material,
ker se lahko vsaka vrsta odpadkov ponovno uporabi za različne namene kot sestavni del novega proizvodnega postopka in se tako ponovno spremeni iz odpadkov v surovino,
whereas every kind of residue may subsequently be used for various purposes as the component of a new production process and hence waste can once again become a raw material,
ker kljub direktivi o odpadkih v Uniji dejansko ne obstaja uradna opredelitev odpadkov in je zato prisotnih več vrst "ovir" za ponovno uporabo tega, kar ostane po prvi predelavi,
whereas, despite the Directive on waste, there is in fact no official definition of waste in the Union, and hence there are various kinds of ‘barriers’ to reusing what is left over from the primary process,
poziva Komisijo, da predlaga direktivo, ki na nedvoumen način opredeljuje to, kar se pojmuje kot odpadki, kar je torej neuporabno, ter tisto, kar lahko kot preostanek prvotnega postopka predelave postane sestavni del drugega postopka predelave ter tako postane uporabna dobrina in kot takšna zaščitena;
Calls on the Commission to propose a directive unambiguously defining both what is to be considered as waste and hence unusable, and what, being left over from a primary production process, may become a component in a secondary production process, and thus a usable and hence protected material;
meni, da bi direktiva poleg tega morala opredeliti sredstva za podporo ponovni uporabi odpadkov ob spoštovanju okolja, da bi izboljšali razvoj proizvodnega procesa, izhajajoč iz predpostavke, da uporaba sekundarnih surovin po uporabi primarnih surovin preprečuje osiromašenje virov.
Considers that the directive should also identify means of support for the re-use of waste, whilst respecting the environment, in order to improve development of the production process, based on the assumption that, after raw materials are used, the secondary use of materials can prevent the impoverishment of resources.
Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli in Romano Maria La Russa
Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli and Romano Maria La Russa, on behalf of the UEN Group
v imenu skupine UEN
and Borghezio
o Lampedusi
on Lampedusa
ker je Lampedusa majhen otok s 5 500 prebivalci velikosti 20 kvadratnih kilometrov, ki se nahaja v sredini Sicilijanskega kanala in ima očitne omejitve glede zmogljivosti sprejemanja množice priseljencev ter iskalcev azila, ki se redno izkrcujejo na njeni obali, pogosto v obupnih pogojih;
whereas Lampedusa is a small 20 km 2 island located in the middle of the Sicilian Channel, with a population of 5 500, which has obvious limits to its capacity to receive and host the mass of immigrants and asylum seekers who regularly land on its coast, often in desperate conditions,
ker so kljub vsem očitnim težavam lokalno prebivalstvo in policija ter tudi nacionalne oblasti vedno ravnali z namenom olajšati položaj priseljencev z reševanjem številnih človeških življenj;
whereas, in spite of obvious difficulties, the local population and police force, as well as the national authorities, have always taken action to alleviate the conditions of the immigrants, saving many human lives,
ker se je 13. marca 2005 več kot 1 000 ljudi različnih narodnosti izkrcalo na Lampedusi in po prejetju prve pomoči bilo nemudoma premeščenih v začasni sprejemni center za tuje državljane, kjer je bil ustrezno obravnavan njihov položaj;
whereas on 13 March 2005 more than 1 000 people of various nationalities landed by boat in Lampedusa and were immediately transferred, after receiving first aid, to a temporary holding centre for foreign nationals, where their situations were duly examined,
ker so bili tisti, ki so prosili, da se jih obravnava kot begunce (več kot 500 priseljencev), premeščeni z Lampeduse v center v Crotoneju, ker ni bilo mogoče, da bi tako majhen otok sprejel takšen val priseljencev;
whereas those who asked to be regarded as refugees (over 500 immigrants) were transferred from Lampedusa to the Crotone centre, because of the impossibility for a small island to host such a wave of immigrants,
ker je 16. marca italijanski minister za notranje zadeve obvestil italijanski parlament, da je Italija ravnala v skladu z zakonom in je zatrdil, da so bili vsi priseljenci ustrezno obravnavani ter jih je bilo samo 494 od 1 235 vrnjenih v Libijo;
whereas on 16 March the Italian Home Affairs Minister informed the Italian Parliament that Italy was acting lawfully, stating that all the immigrants had been properly processed and that only 494 out of 1 235 had been returned to Libya,
ker je bila vrnitev v Libijo izvedena na podlagi sporazuma med Italijo in Libijo, ki ustreza sporazumom z drugimi južnimi sredozemskimi državami;
whereas the return to Libya was carried out on the basis of the agreement between Italy and Libya which has its counterpart in agreements with other southern Mediterranean countries,
ker je Libija ratificirala konvencijo Organizacije afriške enotnosti (OAE), ki priznava Konvencijo Združenih narodov o beguncih iz leta 1951;
whereas Libya has ratified the Organisation of African Unity (OAU) convention which recognises the 1951 United Nations Convention on refugees,
ker je isti minister ob tej priložnosti poročal, da je veliko priseljencev pobegnilo iz centra v Crotoneju in poškodovalo več policistov ter da je bilo le malo pobeglih ponovno ujetih;
whereas the same minister reported that on this occasion many immigrants had escaped from the Crotone centre and injured a number of policemen, and that afterwards only a few of them were recaptured,
ker vsi ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele italijanske nacionalne oblasti, temeljijo na členu 10 italijanskega zakona 286/98 (tako imenovani "zakon Turco-Napolitano"), ki ni bil spremenjen s tako imenovanim "zakonom Bossi-Fini" o priseljevanju;
whereas all the measures taken by the Italian national authorities are based on Article10 of Italian Law 286/98 (the ‘Turco-Napolitano law’), which has not been modified by the ‘Bossi-Fini law’ on immigration,
ker je bil primer vračanja teh priseljencev predložen Sodišču, vendar Sodišče do sedaj še ni sprejelo nobene odločitve o primeru in bo verjetno navezalo stik z italijanskimi oblastmi, da bi zahtevalo nadaljnje podatke;
whereas the matter or the return of these immigrants has been brought before the Court of Justice, but the Court has not so far taken any decision on the case and will probably contact the Italian authorities to ask for further information,
ugotavlja, da posebni primer Lampeduse dokazuje potrebo po obravnavanju nezakonitega priseljevanja na evropski ravni in zahteva primerna sredstva Skupnosti;
Notes that the special case of Lampedusa demonstrates the need to address illegal immigration at European level and requires appropriate Community funds;
priznava, da si italijanske oblasti na vse možne načine prizadevajo, da bi rešile vse priseljence, ki prihajajo na italijansko obalo in vedno od primera do primera preverijo položaj vsakega priseljenca;
Recognises that the Italian authorities are making every possible effort to rescue all immigrants arriving on Italian shores and that they always check the situation of each immigrant on a case-by-case basis;
poudarja, da Evropski parlament ne sme začeti "politične preiskave", ker se primer še vedno obravnava na Sodišču;
Stresses that the European Parliament should refrain from holding a ‘political trial’ since the case is still being discussed in the Court of Justice;
predlaga, da se v Lampeduso pošlje delegacijo poslancev Evropskega parlamenta, da bi preverila zakonitost ukrepov italijanskih oblasti;
Proposes to send a delegation of members of the European Parliament to Lampedusa to verify the legitimacy of the actions of the Italian authorities;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments of the Member States.
o izpolnjevanju dogovora o vlaganju 3% BDP v R&R
on complying with an agreement to invest 3% of GDP in R&D
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o izpolnjevanju dogovora o vlaganju 3% BDP v R&R
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on complying with an agreement to invest 3% of GDP in R&D
ker moramo doseči napredek pri izpolnjevanju lizbonske strategije, ki si prizadeva povečati povprečna evropska sredstva za raziskave od skoraj 2% BDP na 3% do leta 2010,
whereas progress needs to be made on complying with the Lisbon Strategy, which seeks to increase the European average research effort from almost 2% of GDP to 3% by 2010,
ob upoštevanju bližnjega začetka veljave sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave in razvoj,
having regard to the impending entry into force of the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Development,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je družba znanja temeljnega pomena in da si lahko Evropa zagotovi konkurenčen položaj na svetovnem prizorišču le, če bo njena celotna družbena, gospodarska in politična struktura na vseh ravneh vključevala družbo znanja,
having regard to the fact that the knowledge society is fundamental, and if Europe is to guarantee itself a competitive position on the world stage, its social, economic and political fabric needs to be informed by the knowledge society at every level,
ker je zato bistvenega pomena, da države članice izpolnijo prej omenjeni cilj 3%, o katerem so se vse države članice dogovorile na vrhu v Barceloni,
whereas it is therefore essential that the Member States comply with the 3% goal aforesaid, which was agreed on by all the Member States at the Barcelona Summit,
zahteva, da države članice storijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, da dosežejo željeno povprečje in da do leta 2010 dosežejo cilj;
Asks that in order to achieve the average desired, the Member States do everything in their power to reach the objective for 2010;
poziva, da se morajo vse države premikati k temu cilju, četudi ne bodo vse dosegle cilja 3% v istem časovnem okviru;
Asks that even if not all Member States achieve the 3% goal within the same timeframe, they should all be moving towards that goal;
priporoča, da je nujno potrebno opozoriti vse države članice na potrebo po izpolnitvi cilja 3 %, kot je bilo dogovorjeno na vrhu v Barceloni.
Recommends that all the Member States be urgently reminded of the need to comply with the 3% goal, as agreed at the Barcelona Summit.
ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije,
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0237/2005
ki ga v skladu s členom 103(2) Poslovnika
pursuant to Rule 108(5) of the Rules of Procedure
vlaga Karl-Heinz Florenz
by Karl-Heinz Florenz
o strategiji EU za konferenco v Almatiju o Arhuški konvenciji
on the EU strategy for the Almaty Conference on the Aarhus Convention
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU za konferenco v Almatiju o Arhuški konvenciji
European Parliament resolution on the EU strategy for the Almaty Conference on the Aarhus Convention
ob upoštevanju Arhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, sodelovanju javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah z dne 25. junija 1998 ter bližnjega drugega sestanka pogodbenic (MOP-2), ki bo potekalo v Almatiju, Kazahstan, od 25. do 27. maja 2005,
having regard to the Aarhus Convention on access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice in environmental matters of 25 June 1998 and the forthcoming second Meeting of the Parties (MOP-2) to be held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, from 25 to 27 May 2005,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor 0-0000/05 in 0-0000/05 v imenu Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano v skladu s členom 108 svojega Poslovnika in ob upoštevanju izjav Sveta in Komisije,
having regard to Oral Question B6-0237/2005 on behalf of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety,
ob upoštevanju člena 103(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 108(5) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker je Arhuška konvencija stopila v veljavo 30. oktobra 2001,
whereas the Aarhus Convention entered into force on 30 October 2001,
ker so Evropska skupnost in tudi večina njenih držav članic, vključno z novimi državami članicami, 17. februarja 2005 Sklep Sveta z dne 17. februarja 2005 o zaključku Aarhuške konvencije v imenu Evropske skupnosti (še neobjavljeno) ratificirale Arhuško konvencijo,
whereas the Aarhus Convention was ratified by the European Community on 17 February 2005 Council Decision of 17 February 2005 on the conclusion of the Aarhus Convention on behalf of the European Community (not yet published). as well as by a majority of its Member States, including the new Member States,
ker je trenutno 19 od 35 pogodbenic Arhuške konvencije držav članic Evropske unije,
whereas, at present, 19 out of 35 parties to the Aarhus Convention are Member States of the European Union,
ker sta Evropski parlament in Svet že delno sprejela zakonodajne instrumente za izvajanje Arhuške konvencije Direktiva 2003/4/ES o dostopu javnosti do okoljskih informacij in razveljavitvi Direktive Sveta 90/313/EGS (UL L 41 z dne 14.2.2003, str.
whereas Parliament and the Council have already partially adopted the legislative instruments to implement the Aarhus Convention Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (OJ L 41 of 14.02.2003, p.
26); Direktiva 2003/35/ES z dne 26. maja 2003 o sodelovanju javnosti pri sestavi nekaterih načrtov in programov v zvezi z okoljem in o spremembi direktiv Sveta 85/337/EGS in 96/61/ES glede sodelovanja javnosti in dostopa do sodišč (UL L 156, 25.6.2003, str.
26); Directive 2003/35/EC of 26 May 2003 providing for public participation in respect of the drawing up of certain plans and programmes relating to the environment and amending with regard to public participation and access to justice Council Directives 85/337EC and 96/61/EC (OJ L 156 pf 25.06.2003, p.
17) in ker se Parlament in Svet trenutno pogajata o nadaljnjih zakonodajnih instrumentih Predlog uredbe o uporabi določb Arhuške konvencije za institucije in organe ES ( KOM(2003)622 končno); Predlog direktive o dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah ( KOM(2003) 624 ). ,
17). and whereas further legislative instruments are currently being negotiated by Parliament and the Council Proposal for a regulation on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention to EC institutions and bodies ( COM(2003)622 final); proposal for a directive on access to justice in environmental matters ( COM(2003)624 ). ,
ker Arhuška konvencija omogoča organom javne oblasti in državljanom, da prevzamejo osebno in kolektivno odgovornost za zaščito ter izboljšanje okolja za blaginjo sedanjih in prihodnjih generacij,
whereas the Aarhus Convention serves to enable public authorities and citizens to assume their individual and collective responsibility to protect and improve the environment for the welfare and well-being of present and future generations,
ker Kijevski protokol o registrih izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal prispeva k povečanju odgovornosti podjetij, zmanjševanju onesnaževanja in spodbujanju trajnostnega razvoja,
whereas the Kiev Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers contributes to increasing corporate accountability, reducing pollution and promoting sustainable development,
poziva EU, da prevzame vodilno, pregledno in konstruktivno vlogo v pogajanjih;
Urges the EU to take a leading, transparent and constructive role in the negotiations;
meni, da bo MOP-2 nudil dobro priložnost tako za oceno do sedaj doseženega napredka kot za razmislek o bodočih izzivih;
Believes that MOP-2 will provide a good opportunity both to review the progress which has so far been achieved and to reflect on future challenges;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da se s sklepi, sprejetimi na MOP-2, nadalje izvaja in razvija Konvencija ter da se oblikujejo sinergije med Arhuško konvencijo in zadevnimi večstranskimi okoljskimi sporazumi;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the decisions taken at MOP-2 further implement and develop the Convention, and that synergies are created between the Aarhus Convention and the relevant multilateral environmental agreements;
poziva Komisijo in še posebej države članice, da si prizadevajo zagotoviti:
Urges the Commission and the Member States in particular to aim to ensure that
nadaljnje izboljšanje mehanizma privolitve na podlagi pridobljenih izkušenj;
– the compliance mechanism is further improved, based on the experience gained;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj nadaljujejo z zakonodajnim delom, da bi sprejele zakonodajni instrument, ki izvaja člen 9 Konvencije v okviru Evropske unije;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to continue legislative work with the aim of adopting a legislative instrument which implements Article 9 of the Convention within the European Union;
izraža podporo dejavnosti drugih pomembnih mednarodnih organizacij in konvencij, zlasti Kartagenskemu protokolu o biološki varnosti, vendar meni, da je Arhuška konvencija pristojni forum za odločanje o horizontalnih načelih dostopa javnosti do informacij, sodelovanja in dostopa do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah;
Expresses support for the work of other relevant international organisations and Conventions, in particular the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety; considers, however, that the Aarhus Convention is the competent forum for deliberating on horizontal principles of public access to information, participation and access to justice in environmental matters;