natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
je seznanjen z delovanjem splošnega sistem preferencialov (GSP+); vendar meni, da je treba ta sistem, ki nagrajuje države s precejšnjimi trgovinskimi ugodnosti, če izpolnjujejo mednarodne konvencije in standarde o človekovih in delovnopravnih pravicah, podrobneje in pregledneje spremljati, vključno z uporabo natančnih ocen učinka za človekove pravice, doslednega in poštenega primerjalnega sistema, in odprtih posvetovanj ob dodelitvi preferencialov, in da se trgovinski preferenciali odobravajo le za države, ki so ratificirale in dejansko izvajajo temeljne mednarodne konvencije o trajnostnem razvoju, človekovih pravicah – zlasti delu otrok – in dobrem upravljanju; poziva k okrepljenemu spremljanju izvajanja s civilno družbo, sindikati in skupnostmi, ob upoštevanju dosežkov pa tudi neuspehov v razvoju človekovih pravic, vključno s socialnimi, ekonomskimi, kulturnimi in okoljskimi pravicami; poudarja pomen podrobnega spremljanja izvajanja Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah v Pakistanu, ki je povabljen k sodelovanju v sistemu GSP+;
Notes the functioning of the GSP+ (Generalised System of Preferences) regime; considers, however, that this system which rewards countries with considerable trade benefits for compliance with international human rights and labour rights conventions and standards must be more closely and transparently monitored, including by the use of detailed Human Rights Impacts Assessments, a consistent and fair benchmarking system, and open consultations when the preference is being awarded, and that trade preferences must be granted only to countries that have ratified and effectively implemented key international conventions on sustainable development, human rights - particularly child labour - and good governance; calls for enhanced monitoring of implementation with civil society, trade unions and communities, taking account of the achievements as well as the setbacks in the development of human rights, including social, economic, cultural and environmental rights; stresses the importance of close monitoring of ICCPR implementation by Pakistan, which is invited to participate in the GSP+ system;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predlog uredbe o prepovedi uvoza blaga, proizvedenega s prisilnim delom in zlasti z delom otrok, pri čemer so kršeni temeljni standardi človekovih pravic, v EU; poudarja, da bi morala takšna uredba omogočati, da EU razišče posamezne primere;
Urges the Commission to table a proposal for a regulation banning importation into the EU of goods produced using forced labour, and in particular child labour, in violation of basic human rights standards; emphasises that such a regulation would have to enable the EU to investigate specific claims;
pozdravlja vključitev klavzule o človekovih pravicah v partnerski sporazum, ki sta ga podpisali EU in Indonezija in v stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum z Albanijo, ki sta začela veljati v poročevalnem obdobju, s čimer je več kot 120 držav sprejelo vključitev te klavzule v sporazume z EU;
Welcomes the inclusion of a human rights clause in the Partnership Agreement signed by the EU with Indonesia and in the Stabilisation and Association Agreement with Albania, which entered into force during the reporting period, which brings to more than 120 the number of countries accepting the inclusion of this clause in agreements with the EU;
obžaluje slabo spremljanje klavzul o človekovih pravicah, ki jih vsebuje sporazum iz Cotonouja, in poziva visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, Komisijo, Svet in države članice, naj v celoti uporabljajo navedene klavzule in se obširno zavzemajo za reševanje težav na področju človekovih pravic ter za spodbujanje človekovih pravic v dvostranskih in regionalnih dialogih s partnerskimi državami AKP;
Deplores the poor follow-up of human rights clauses inserted in the Cotonou Agreement, and urges the HR/VP, the Commission, the Council and the Member States to make full use of those clauses in order to take up extensively human rights problems and the promotion of human rights in bilateral and regional dialogues with ACP partner countries;
pozdravlja sklepe Sveta o podpiranju demokracije v zunanjih odnosih EU GAERC, 17.11.2009.
Welcomes the Council Conclusions on Democracy Support in EU External Relations GAERC 17 November 2009.
in sprejetje načrta EU za ukrepanje pri podpori demokraciji v zunanjih odnosih EU kot sredstvo za izboljšanje skladnosti in učinkovitosti podpore EU demokraciji;
and the adoption of the EU Agenda for Action on Democracy Support in EU External Relations as a means of improving the coherence and effectiveness of EU democracy support;
poziva Komisijo, naj končno, brez odlašanja ter s potrebnimi pobudami in finančnimi zavezami nadaljuje ukrepe na podlagi Poročila o človekovih pravicah za leto 2007, v katerem je Parlament izrazil mnenje, „da je nenasilje najprimernejši instrument za polno uživanje, uveljavljanje, spodbujanje in spoštovanje temeljnih človekovih pravic“ v prepričanju, da bi „moralo postati spodbujanje te ideje prednostna naloga politike EU na področju človekovih pravic in demokracije“;
Urges the Commission finally to follow up without delay, through the necessary initiatives and financial commitments, the 2007 Human Rights Report in which Parliament considered ‘non-violence as the most appropriate means of ensuring that fundamental human rights are enjoyed, upheld, promoted and respected’, believing that ‘its promotion should constitute a priority objective in EU human rights and democracy policy’;
poziva Komisijo, naj letne akcijske programe svojih zunanjih instrumentov, zlasti EIDHR, pa tudi v strateške dokumente regij in držav, bolj celostno vključi program spodbujanja demokracije, ob doslednem upoštevanju specifičnega položaja držav ter regionalne strategije EU;
Calls on the Commission to integrate the agenda for democracy support more fully in the annual action programmes of its external instruments, in particular that of the EIDHR, as well as in regional and country strategy papers, thereby consistently taking into account the country's specific situation and the EU's regional strategy;
je seznanjen s poročilom Amnesty International za leto 2010, ki opozarja na trenutno drugo sojenje nekdanjemu direktorju naftne družbe YUKOS Mihailu Hodorkovskemu in njegovemu družabniku Platonu Lebedevu kot primer nepravičnih sojenj v Rusiji; poziva Rusko federacijo, naj pri njunem pregonu in pregonu vseh drugih obtožencev v svojem pravosodnem sistemu zagotovi spoštovanje temeljnih standardov primernega sojenja in človekovih pravic;
Takes note of the Amnesty International Report 2010 which highlights the ongoing second trial of former YUKOS oil company chief Mikhail Khodorkovsky and his business associate Platon Lebedev as representative of unfair trials in Russia; calls upon the Russian Federation to ensure that fundamental norms of due process and human rights are respected in the prosecution of these and all other defendants in the country's justice system;
poziva ruske sodne organe, naj nadaljujejo preiskavo o smrti ruskega odvetnika Sergeya Magnitskya 16. novembra 2009; obžaluje, da je njegov primer še vedno očiten dokaz hudih pomanjkljivosti pravosodnega sistema te države; obžaluje tudi tamkajšnje razmere, ko so zagovorniki človekovih pravic pogosto žrtve neprizanesljive obravnave in sodnih postopkov, v katerih se ne spoštuje zakonika o kazenskem postopku Ruske federacije (na primer njegovega 72. člena v zadevi zoper Olega Orlova iz centra Memorial zaradi obrekovanja), krivci za nasilje in celo umore zagovornikov človekovih pravic, neodvisnih novinarjev in odvetnikov pa še vedno prepogosto ostajajo nekaznovani; poziva Svet, naj glede na to, da ruske oblasti niso dale nobenega pozitivnega znamenja, da nameravajo sodelovati in raziskati primer Sergeja Magnitskega, vztraja, da se odgovorne privede pred sodišče, in razmisli o tem, ali naj se ruskim uradnikom, vpletenim v ta primer, prepove vstop v EU, organe pregona EU pa poziva, naj sodelujejo pri zamrznitvi bančnih računov in drugega premoženja teh ruskih uradnikov v vseh državah članicah EU;
Urges the Russian judicial authorities to press ahead with the investigation of the death on 16 November 2009 of Russian lawyer Sergey Magnitsky; deplores that this case is still an outstanding example of the serious shortcomings within the country's judicial system; regrets the situation that, while human rights defenders are often subject to a harsh treatment and trials that ignore the Russian Federation's Code of Criminal Procedure (such as its Article 72 in the case against Oleg Orlov of Memorial for slander), those guilty of aggressions against and even murder of human rights defenders, independent journalists and lawyers still too often enjoy impunity; calls on the Council, in the absence of positive moves from the Russian authorities to cooperate and investigate the case of Sergey Magnitsky, to insist that the Russian authorities bring those responsible to justice and to consider imposing an EU entry ban for Russian officials involved in this case, and encourages EU law enforcement agencies to cooperate in freezing bank accounts and other assets of these Russian officials in all EU Member States;
poziva visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico Komisije naj poskrbi za to, da bodo človekove pravice in izgradnja demokracije učinkovito postale rdeča nit vseh področij zunanjih politik; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se Svet ni uradno seznanil z nobenim poročilom o nadaljnjem ukrepanju v zvezi s sklepi Sveta iz novembra 2009 o spodbujanju demokracije v zunanjih odnosih EU in programu za ukrepanje v podporo demokraciji, čeprav je v omenjenih sklepih Sveta navedeno nasprotno;
Calls on the HR/VP of the Commission to ensure that human rights and democracy-building effectively become ‘the silver thread running through all’ external policy areas; notes meanwhile with concern that the Council has not formally taken note of any follow-up report in relation to the Council conclusions of November 2009 on Democracy Support in the EU's External Relations and the Agenda for Action on Democracy Support, contrary to what is stipulated in the said Council conclusions;
pozdravlja sklepe, ki jih je Svet sprejel decembra 2009 o spodbujanju spoštovanja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava, v letu, ko se je praznovala 60. obletnica ženevskih konvencij;
Welcomes the conclusions adopted by the Council in December 2009 on promoting compliance with IHL, in the same year that the 60th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions was celebrated;
ugotavlja, da so bile leta 2009 sprejete posodobljene smernice EU o spodbujanju spoštovanja mednarodnega humanitarnega prava; poziva Svet, naj učinkoviteje povezuje uresničevanje smernic o mednarodnem humanitarnem pravu s preostalimi smernicami o človekovih pravicah in izboljša vključitev mednarodnega humanitarnega prava v celotno zunanje delovanje EU;
Notes the adoption of the Updated EU Guidelines on promoting compliance with IHL in 2009; calls on the Council to integrate the implementation of the IHL guidelines more effectively with the other EU human rights guidelines and to improve the mainstreaming of IHL throughout the external action of the EU;
pozdravlja Poročilo o neodvisni mednarodni preiskavi spora v Gruziji (IIFFMCG – CEIIG) (Tagliavinijino poročilo), ki je bilo objavljeno 30. septembra 2009, in potrjuje njegove glavne ugotovitve in sklepe na področju mednarodnega humanitarnega prava in prava na področju človekovih pravic, zlasti potrebo po zagotovitvi odgovornosti in odškodnine za vse kršitve, storjene avgusta 2008, ter pričakuje, da bo obsežne informacije o ozadju, ki se nahajajo v poročilu, mogoče uporabiti v sodnih postopkih na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni, da se nazadnje le zagotovi odgovornost za kazniva dejanja, storjena v konfliktu med Rusijo in Gruzijo avgusta 2008;
Welcomes the Report of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia (IIFFMCG – CEIIG) (the ‘Tagliavini Report’) issued on 30 September 2009, and supports its main observations and conclusions under international humanitarian law and human rights law, in particular the need to ensure accountability and reparation for all violations committed in August 2008, and expects that the extensive background information provided by the report can be used for legal proceedings at national and international level to finally ensure accountability for the crimes committed during the conflict between Russia and Georgia of August 2008;
globoko obžaluje, da so kršitve mednarodnega humanitarnega prava v oboroženem spopadu med Rusijo in Gruzijo zaradi Južne Osetije in Abhazije avgusta 2008 povzročile na stotine žrtev in na desettisoče razseljenih oseb; ponavlja, da je do današnjega dne Rusija izpolnila samo prvo od šestih točk svojega sporazuma z Gruzijo o prekinitvi sovražnosti; obžaluje namensko uničenje etničnih gruzinskih vasi v Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji med spopadom in po njem; poudarja, da te kršitve še dandanes ostajajo nekaznovane;
Deeply regrets that during the armed conflict between Russia and Georgia over South Ossetia and Abkhazia in August 2008 the violations of international humanitarian law resulted in hundreds of casualties and tens of thousands of displaced individuals; recalls that to this day Russia has fulfilled only the first point of its six-point ceasefire agreement with Georgia; deplores the deliberate destruction of ethnic Georgian villages in South Ossetia and Abkhazia during and after the conflict; stresses that impunity for these violations persists to this day;
Svoboda veroizpovedi ali prepričanja
Freedom of religion or belief
poudarja, da je svoboda veroizpovedi in prepričanja med vsemi človekovimi pravicami osnovno in temeljno pravico, ki jo je treba spoštovati, in da treba močneje in učinkoviteje uresničevati pogoje v zvezi s spoštovanjem človekovih pravic iz dvostranskih sporazumov z državami, ki niso članice EU;
Underlines that freedom of religion or belief constitutes, amongst all human rights, an essential and basic right which must be respected, and that conditionalities related to respect for human rights which feature in the bilateral agreements with non-EU countries need to be enforced more strongly and more effectively;
pozdravlja sklepe Sveta o svobodi veroizpovedi, sprejete novembra 2009; potrjuje pomen svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja za identiteto vernih in nevernih oseb, saj je prepričanje, ne glede na obliko nujni sestavni del osebnosti in družbene pripadnosti; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta in izvajata praktične ukrepe za boj proti verski nestrpnosti in diskriminaciji ter spodbujanje svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja po vsem svetu, kot je navedeno v zgoraj omenjenih sklepih; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v ta proces vključujeta tudi EP, organizacije civilne družbe in preostale zadevne akterje;
Welcomes the Council conclusions on freedom of religion or belief adopted in November 2009; acknowledges the importance of freedom of religion or belief for the identity of religious and non-religious individuals alike, given that belief, in whatever form it takes, is a vital component of personal and social belonging; calls on the Council and the Commission to adopt and implement practical measures to fight religious intolerance and discrimination and promote freedom of religion or belief worldwide as considered in the aforementioned conclusions; calls on the Council and the Commission to involve the EP, civil society organisations and other relevant actors in the process;
poziva visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, naj svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja vključi v politiko EU o človekovih pravicah in naj v letnem poročilu EU o človekovih pravicah pripravi izčrpno oceno razmer na področju svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja;
Calls on the HR/VP of the Commission to mainstream freedom of religion or belief in EU human rights policy and to give a thorough evaluation of the situation of freedom of religion or belief in the EU Annual Report on Human Rights;
poziva visoko predstavnico/podpredsednico, naj poveča število osebja, ki obravnava vprašanja v zvezi s svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja na področju zunanjega delovanja ter ustvari namenske strukture, zlasti v okviru ustanovitve ESZD; podpira opredelitev vprašanja spoštovanja svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja v svetu kot ene od prednostnih nalog ESZD glede na hude kršitve te svobode po svetu in glede na to, da preganjane verske manjšine na številnih področjih očitno potrebujejo pomoč;
Calls on the HR/VP to increase the number of staff working on issues concerning respect for freedom of religion or belief in external action and to create dedicated structures, especially in the context of the establishment of the European External Action Service; supports the identification of the issue of respect for freedom of religion or belief in the world as one of the priorities of the EEAS, given the grave violations of such freedom existing in the world and the obvious need to provide assistance for persecuted religious minorities in many areas of the globe;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj upoštevata vero in dialog z verskimi oblastmi in organi, ki v medverskem dialogu delujejo pri preprečevanju sporov, reševanju sporov in spravi;
Calls on the Council and Commission to take into account religion and the dialogue with religious authorities and bodies engaged in inter-faith dialogue in conflict prevention, conflict resolution and reconciliation;
poziva EU, naj pripravi priročnik za pospeševanje pravice do svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja v svojem zunanjem delovanju, naj svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja obravnava kot temeljno, naj vključi seznam potrebnih svobod, ki so del svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja, za preverjanje, ali se spoštujejo, in vključi mehanizme za ugotavljanje kršitev svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja, da bi okrepila spodbujanje svobode veroizpovedi ali prepričanja pri delu javnih uradnikov, zlasti v ESZD, ter v pripravo priročnika vključi organizacije civilne družbe;
Urges the EU to develop a toolkit on the advancement of the right to freedom of religion or belief in its external policy, to regard freedom of religion or belief as fundamental, to include a checklist on the necessary freedoms pertaining to the right of freedom of religion or belief in order to assess whether they are being respected and to include mechanisms to identify infringements of freedom of religion or belief, in order to enhance the promotion of freedom of religion or belief in the work of civil servants, especially in the European External Action Service, as well as to involve civil society organisations in the preparation of the toolkit;
pozdravlja stalno načelno naravnanost EU glede resolucij generalne skupščine OZN (in Sveta ZN za človekove pravice) o boju proti razžalitvi ver; pozdravlja resolucijo o odpravi vseh oblik nestrpnosti in diskriminacije na podlagi vere ali prepričanja, ki jo je predložila EU; spodbuja EU, naj si še naprej prizadeva za uravnotežen pristop med svobodo izražanja in prepovedjo spodbujanja k verski nestrpnosti; spodbuja EU, naj vzpostavi konstruktiven dialog z Organizacijo za islamsko konferenco in drugimi podporniki načela razžalitve ver;
Welcomes the EU's continuous stance of principle in relation to the UNGA and UNHRC resolutions on combating defamation of religions; welcomes the resolution on elimination of all forms of intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief tabled by the EU; encourages the EU to continue its striving for a balanced approach between freedom of expression and a prohibition of incitement to religious hatred; encourages the EU to engage in a constructive dialogue with the Organisation for Islamic Conference and other supporters of the principle of defamation of religions;
poudarja, da mednarodno pravo o človekovih pravicah svobodo veroizpovedi ali prepričanja priznava ne glede na registracijski status, zato registracija ne bi smela biti obvezen predpogoj za opravljanje veroizpovedi; poleg tega z zaskrbljenostjo poudarja, da se morajo verske skupine v Azerbajdžanu, Kazahstanu, Kirgizistanu, Tadžikistanu, Turkmenistanu, Uzbekistanu in Vietnamu registrirati pri vladi in delovati pod vodstvom upravnih organov, ki so pod nadzorom vlade in posegajo v njihovo versko avtonomijo ter omejujejo njihove dejavnosti;
Stresses that international human rights law recognises freedom of religion or belief regardless of registration status, so registration should not be a mandatory precondition for practising one's religion; points out with concern, furthermore, that in Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Vietnam religious groups need to register with the government and operate under government-controlled management boards, which interfere with their religious autonomy and restrict their activity;
poziva Rusijo, naj uvede moratorij na izvajanje zakona iz leta 2002 o boju proti dejavnostim skrajnežev, saj se uporablja in zlorablja za omejevanje verske svobode ter za zatiranje in pri poskusih prepovedi nenasilnih verskih skupin; poleg tega z veliko zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je bilo 265 verskih in konfesionalnih organizacij uvrščenih na črni seznam tako imenovanih organizacij skrajnežev;
Calls on Russia to put a moratorium on the implementation of the 2002 Law on Fighting Extremist Activity as it is used and abused to restrict religious freedom, and to repress and attempt to ban non-violent religious groups; notes furthermore with great concern that 265 religious and faith-based organisations are on a black list of so-called extremist organisations;
poleg tega poziva naslednje države, naj prenehajo omejevati svobodo združevanja in zbiranja verskih skupin in naj spoštujejo svobodo veroizpovedi in prepričanja: Savdsko Arabijo, Egipt, Eritrejo, Iran, Somalijo, Jemen, Belorusijo, Severna Korejo in Laos;
Urges, furthermore, the following countries to stop restrictions on freedom of association and assembly of religious groups and to respect freedom of religion or belief: Saudi Arabia, Egypt , Eritrea, Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Belarus, North Korea and Laos;
poudarja ovire za neovirano izpovedovanje vere, ki še vedno obstajajo v nekaterih delih sveta, kot so Savdska Arabija, Indonezija, Pakistan, Irak, Somalija in Sudan, tako na ravni posameznika kot skupin ter vedno večjo nestrpnost do verskih manjšin v državah z uveljavljenimi demokratičnimi tradicijami, kot je Indija, ter poziva Komisijo, naj ta vprašanja poudarja v okviru ustreznih političnih dialogov;
Underlines the obstacles still existing in parts of the world such as Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Iraq, Somalia and Sudan to the unhindered profession of faith, at both the individual and the collective level, as well as growing intolerance of religious minorities in countries with grounded democratic traditions such as India, and calls on the Commission to emphasise such issues in the context of its relevant political dialogues;
ostro obsoja vsako kriminalizacijo ali kaznovanje odpadništva v primeru spreobrnjenja iz ene vere v drugo ali iz ene verske podskupine v drugo, ki se še izvaja v večini bližnjevzhodnih in severnoafriških držav; poziva institucije EU, naj izvajajo pritisk na te države, da opustijo take prakse, zlasti kadar predvidevajo smrtno kazen; je globoko zaskrbljen zaradi praks prisilnega spreobračanja, ki še obstajajo v državah, kot sta Savdska Arabija in Egipt, ter zahteva jasno zavezo institucij EU za boj proti takim kršitvam človekovih pravic;
Firmly condemns any criminalisation or punishment for ‘apostasy’ in relation to cases of conversion from one religion to another or from one religious denomination (subgroup) to another, as still carried out in most of the countries of the Middle East and North Africa; calls on the EU institutions to exert pressure on these countries to reject such practices, in particular where capital punishment is the prescribed penalty; is deeply concerned about forced conversion practices still existing in countries such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt, and asks for a clear commitment on the part of the EU institutions to the fight against such human rights violations;