natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/21/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o skupnem regulativnem okviru za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve (Okvirna direktiva) UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive) OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/22/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o univerzalni storitvi in pravicah uporabnikov v zvezi z elektronskimi komunikacijskimi omrežji in storitvami (Direktiva o univerzalnih storitvah) UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive) OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva z Evropskega sveta v Lizboni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Komisije z dne 29. julija 2002 o ustanovitvi Evropske skupine regulatornih organov za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve UL L 200, 30.7.2002, str.
having regard to the Commission Decision of 29 July 2002 establishing the European Regulators Group for Electronic Communications Networks and Services OJ L 200, 30.7.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0305/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0305/2005 ),
ker se postopki za prenos in izvajanje zakonodaje Skupnosti med državami članicami razlikujejo, tak položaj pa ovira nastanek resnično enotnega trga elektronskih komunikacij,
whereas the procedures for transposing and implementing Community law vary from one Member State to the next, a situation which is jeopardising the completion of a genuine single market in electronic communications,
ker Komisija igra osrednjo vlogo pri izvajanju in pravilni uporabi regulativnega okvira,
whereas the Commission plays a central role in the implementation and proper application of the regulatory framework,
ker v primeru kršitev Komisija lahko sproži postopke proti državam članicam, ki ne izvajajo ustrezne zakonodaje ali jo izvajajo nepravilno,
whereas the Commission may initiate infringement proceedings against Member States which fail to apply the relevant legislation or do so incorrectly,
ker Komisija v skladu s postopkom iz člena 7 Okvirne direktive oceni ukrepe, ki jih nacionalni regulatorni organi nameravajo izvajati,
whereas, under the procedure described in Article 7 of the Framework Directive, the Commission assesses the measures which national regulatory authorities (NRAs) plan to take,
ker ta določba služi regulatornemu organu kot prožno sredstvo, ki mu omogoča, da poseže na trg, kadar je ogrožena svobodna konkurenca,
whereas this provision serves as a flexible instrument enabling the regulator to intervene in the market where free competition may be under threat,
ker so ti vidiki urejanja dragocena možnost, ki omogoča regulatornemu organu, da pravilno posega na razvijajoč se trg, kjer bodo najnovejše tehnološke inovacije omogočale zagotavljanje novih storitev za stranke,
whereas these aspects of regulation are valuable in enabling the regulator to intervene correctly in an evolving market where recent technological innovation will make it possible to provide new services for consumers,
ker ta regulativni sistem omogoča prilagajanje izvajanja izboljšav na podlagi načela sorazmernosti in zmanjšanje regulativnih obremenitev, ko konkurenčni trendi na trgu upravičujejo tako dejavnost,
whereas this regulatory system makes it possible to adjust the application of remedies on the basis of the principle of proportionality, and to scale down the regulatory burdens when competition trends in the market justify doing so,
ker se nacionalni regulatorni organi neodvisno odločajo za posege na trge in ker se pri tem ravnajo po merilu sorazmernosti glede na zastavljene cilje,
whereas NRAs decide quite independently to intervene in the markets and whereas the criterion on which such intervention is based is that it should be proportionate to the objectives pursued,
ker so pritožbeni postopki proti odločitvam nacionalnih regulatornih organov dolgotrajni in ker imajo v nekaterih državah članicah pritožbeni postopki zoper te odločitve redno suspenzivni učinek,
whereas the procedure for appeals against NRA decisions is a lengthy one, and whereas in some Member States such decisions are systematically suspended pending the outcome of the appeal,
ker zamude pri izvajanju in analizah trga predstavljajo veliko oviro pri vzpostavitvi enotnega trga elektronskih komunikacij in ustvarijo tako med podjetji v različnih državah članicah različne pogoje dela in negotovosti glede tega, kateri regulativni pristop uporabiti v prehodnem obdobju,
whereas the delays in implementation and market analysis are a serious obstacle to the creation of a single market in electronic communications, creating different operating conditions for companies in the various Member States and uncertainties as regards the regulatory approach adopted during the transitional period,
ker bo jasno opredeljen pravni okvir ustvaril take pogoje, ki vzpodbujajo operaterje k novim naložbam, in ker je to nujno, da bi lahko evropska industrija elektronskih komunikacij prevzela vodilno vlogo v mednarodnem prostoru,
whereas a clear regulatory framework will create the conditions to encourage operators to make further investments, and whereas this is vital to enable the European electronic communications industry to play a leadership role in the international arena,
ker lahko z razlago in izvajanjem predpisov o infrastrukturi za elektronske komunikacije Komisija znatno prispeva k varovanju in spodbujanju pluralnosti medijev,
whereas by interpreting and applying infrastructure regulations for electronic communications the Commission can make a substantial contribution to securing and promoting media pluralism,
ker kljub ukrepom, ki jih za zmanjšanje pretirano visokih stroškov mednarodnega gostovanja v EU izvajajo nacionalni regulatorni organi, cene klicev v ali iz druge države še vedno ostajajo previsoke ter zaradi obstoječega tveganja za protikonkurenčne dogovore in zlorabo prevladujočega položaja,
whereas, despite the measures taken by NRAs to reduce excessively high roaming charges in the EU, the rates for calls to or from abroad remain too high, and noting the existing risks of anti-competitive agreements and abuse of dominant positions,
ker lahko pravilno urejen enotni trg zagotavlja poštene pogoje za izvajanje storitev in cen za vse potrošnike, tako da jim omogoča zahtevano preglednost in varnost,
whereas a correctly regulated single market can safeguard fair service and price conditions for all consumers, by providing them with the necessary transparency and security,
ker pravni okvir pomaga določati nastanek in nadaljnji obstoj pluralnosti medijev,
whereas the legal framework helps to determine the emergence and continuance of media pluralism,
ker v Beli knjigi o storitvah splošnega pomena ( KOM(2004)0374 ) Komisija navaja, da je cilj ustvarjanja odprtega in konkurenčnega notranjega trga združljiv s ciljem razvoja storitev splošnega pomena, zato je nujno ohraniti pravične pogoje cen in storitev za potrošnike, ki bodo ustvarili enoten trg komunikacij, ki bo vključeval celotno evropsko ozemlje in tako zmanjšal digitalni razkorak, kar je prednostna naloga Evropske unije,
whereas the Commission states in its White Paper on services of general interest ( COM(2004)0374 ) that the aim of creating an open and competitive internal market is compatible with that of developing general interest services, and it is therefore essential to safeguard the fair price and service conditions for consumers, such as will create a single telecommunications market covering the entire European territory, so as to reduce the digital divide, a priority aim for the European Union,
se strinja s pomisleki, ki jih je Komisija izrazila v svojem, zgoraj navedenem, sporočilu; popolnoma podpira Komisijo v njeni vlogi glavnega pobudnika ureditve, tako glede pravilne razlage novih predpisov, kakor tudi glede potrebe po zagotovitvi njihove enotne uporabe na način, ki bo skladen s cilji predpisov o elektronskih komunikacijah, s pravočasnim in stalnim spremljanjem;
Shares the concerns expressed by the Commission in its abovementioned communication; fully supports the Commission in its role as a driving force for regulation, both as regards the correct interpretation of the new rules and the need to ensure their uniform application in a manner consistent with the objectives of electronic communications regulation, by means of timely and constant monitoring;
poudarja potrebo po začetku institucionalne razprave, katere cilj naj bo okrepitev in pojasnitev tako evropskega institucionalnega modela na področju elektronskih komunikacij, kakor tudi ustreznega regulativnega okvira, ter opredelitev najboljših poti za dosego tega cilja;
Stresses the need to open an institutional debate aimed at strengthening and clarifying both the European institutional model in the electronic communications sector and the relevant regulatory framework, and at identifying the best ways of achieving this goal;
poziva, da se okrepi vloga Komisije, in poudarja, da bi morala igrati osrednjo vlogo kot varuh zakonodaje Skupnosti, medtem ko je Evropska skupina regulatornih organov še naprej le posvetovalno in svetovalno telo Komisije v skladu s Sklepom 2002/627/ES s ciljem celovite in skladne uporabe regulativnega okvira v skladu s členom 7(2) Okvirne direktive;
Calls therefore for the Commission's role to be strengthened and stresses that it should play a central role as the guardian of Community legislation, whereas the European Regulators Group (ERG) should continue to act as a consultative and advisory body for the Commission in accordance with Decision 2002/627/EC, with the goal of consistent and coherent application of the regulatory framework under Article 7(2) of the Framework Directive;
popolnoma podpira dejavnosti Komisije tako pri postopkih zoper države članice, ki ne izpolnjujejo svojih obveznosti, kakor pri analizi ukrepov, ki jih nacionalni regulatorni organi sporočajo v skladu s členom 7 Okvirne direktive; poziva Komisijo, da pozorno spremlja ukrepe na nacionalnih trgih, tako da le-ti ne bi ogrožali uresničitve enotnega trga elektronskih komunikacij;
Fully supports the Commission's activities both in bringing proceedings against Member States failing to comply and in analysing the notifications from NRAs pursuant to Article 7 of the Framework Directive; calls on the Commission to remain vigilant so as to ensure that measures relating to national markets do not jeopardise the completion of the single market in electronic communications;
poudarja, da se sestava in naloge Evropske skupine regulatornih organov in skupine neodvisnih regulatornih organov močno prekrivajo, in da se je zato potrebno izogniti vsakemu podvojenemu delu in nepotrebni uporabi omejenih upravnih virov; zato priporoča, da se doseže dogovor o postopnem združevanju Evropske skupine regulatornih organov in skupine neodvisnih regulatornih organov;
Stresses that the composition and functions of the ERG and the Independent Regulators Group (IRG) overlap to a large extent and that it is therefore necessary to avoid any duplication of effort and unnecessary use of limited administrative resources; with this in mind, recommends that agreement be reached on the gradual merging of the ERG and IRG;
poudarja potrebo, da se mora Evropska skupina regulatornih organov omejiti na svoje svetovalne naloge, pri čemer čim bolj vsestransko in pregledno vključuje vse zainteresirane strani, in da nadaljuje dejavnosti, ki so ji bile izrecno dodeljene na osnovi regulativnega okvira;
Stresses the need for the ERG to confine itself to consultative activities, involving all parties concerned as fully and as transparently as possible, and to pursuing activities specifically entrusted to it under the regulatory framework;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži Parlamentu svoje letno poročilo o napredku pri izvajanju regulativnega okvira takoj, ko bo le-to sprejeto, kakor tudi druga poročila o analizi delovanja trga elektronskih komunikacij, tako da bo Parlament pravočasno vključen v postopek spremljanja;
Calls on the Commission to submit to Parliament its annual report on progress in implementing the regulatory framework as soon as it is adopted, together with any other reports concerning the analysis of the functioning of the electronic communications market, so that Parliament can be involved promptly in the monitoring process;
pozdravlja naglo povečanje gostote širokopasovnih priključkov; poziva Komisijo, naj obvesti Parlament o svojih dejavnostih spremljanja razvoja sektorja širokopasovnih storitev in ukrepov v zvezi s tem;
Welcomes the rapid increase in broadband penetration; asks the Commission to inform the Parliament of its activities in monitoring the development of the broadband sector and of the action taken in this respect;
Države članice in nacionalni regulatorni organi
Member States and NRAs
obžaluje, da nekatere države članice še niso v celoti sprejele regulativnega okvira ali pa ga niso pravilno uporabile, in poziva te države članice, naj se takoj uskladijo z zakonodajo Skupnosti o elektronskih komunikacijah;
Regrets the fact that some Member States have not yet fully transposed the regulatory framework or have not applied it properly, and calls on these Member States to comply immediately with Community law on electronic communications;
poziva države članice, naj ustrezno podprejo dejavnosti nacionalnih regulatornih organov, ki jim omejena sredstva ne omogočajo hitrega izvrševanja danih nalog; poziva države članice tudi, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe za hitrejše obravnavanje pritožb zoper odločitve nacionalnih regulatornih organov;
Calls on the Member States to provide adequate support for the activities of NRAs, whose limited resources do not enable them to complete the tasks assigned to them quickly; calls also on the Member States to introduce the measures needed to speed up the timescale for appeals procedures concerning NRA decisions;
nujno poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo popolno neodvisnost nacionalnih regulatornih organov in poziva Komisijo, naj to skrbno nadzoruje in o tem obvešča Parlament;
Urges the Member States to guarantee the total independence of NRAs and calls on the Commission to monitor the situation closely and keep Parliament informed;
spodbuja nacionalne regulatorne organe in Komisijo k izvajanju boljših presoj vpliva in primerjalnih analiz predlaganih obveznosti ter njihove učinkovitosti in uspešnosti za trge;
Encourages the NRAs and the Commission to carry out better impact assessments and benchmarking concerning the obligations proposed and their efficiency and effectiveness for the markets;
poziva države članice, naj upoštevajo načeli preglednosti in sorazmernosti ter utemeljijo vse upravne predpise v breme izvajalcev na področju dodeljevanja storitev, pri čemer upoštevajo zadeve splošnega pomena; poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma preveri stanje na tem področju;
Calls on the Member States to comply with the principles of transparency and proportionality and justify the administrative charges imposed on operators for authorisation of services, while respecting public interest concerns; and calls on the Commission to carry out checks in this area without delay;
poudarja pomen ustreznega dodeljevanja frekvenc za storitve splošnega pomena, odprtih, preglednih in nediskriminatornih postopkov, kakor tudi potrebno prožnost pri dodeljevanju radijskih frekvenc in pri izdaji licenc;
Stresses the importance of adequate frequency allocation for public-interest services, open, transparent and non-discriminatory procedures, and the need for sufficient flexibility when allocating radio frequencies and granting licences;
priporoča državam članicam, Komisiji in nacionalnim regulatornim organom, da upoštevajo, da mora regulativni okvir pritegniti in zaščiti naložbe; poudarja, da je treba spodbujati naložbe v infrastrukturo, zlasti v širokopasovna omrežja, v mobilno telefonijo tretje generacije in v druge nastajajoče trge, pri čemer upoštevajo storitve splošnega gospodarskega pomena;
Recommends that the Member States, the Commission and NRAs take account of the need for the regulatory framework to attract and safeguard investment; stresses the need to encourage investments in infrastructure, with particular reference to broadband, third generation mobile telephony and other emerging markets, while taking account of services of general economic interest;
poudarja potrebo po varovanju urejenih storitev tudi ob spreminjajoči se tehnologiji, posebno v zvezi z dostopnimi omrežji; zato meni, da je pomembno ohranjati možnost, da se nadomestnim operaterjem ponudi dostop do nove infrastrukture pod pravičnimi in razumnimi pogoji;
Stresses the need to safeguard regulated services even though technology is changing, especially when it comes to the access network; hence, considers it important to maintain the possibility to give alternative operators access to the new infrastructure on fair and reasonable terms;
poudarja, da se morajo regulativni ukrepi osredotočiti na odpravo izkrivljanj, ki onemogočajo pošteno konkurenco, zlasti pa je treba upoštevati potrebo po spodbujanju razvoja novih trgov in enakih možnosti za tržne udeležence;
Points out that regulatory intervention should focus on eliminating distortions that prevent fair competition, taking into account in particular the need to encourage the development of emerging markets and equal opportunities for market participants;
opozarja, da razvoj mobilne telefonije tretje generacije včasih ovirajo nacionalni in lokalni predpisi v zvezi z izdajo dovoljenj za gradnjo infrastruktur in s strogimi kriteriji pri izdaji licenc; zato poziva pristojne oblasti, naj ukrepajo in naj odpravijo vse ovire za čim večji napredek komunikacij tretje generacije;
Points out that the development of third generation mobile telephony is sometimes hampered by national and local provisions as regards authorisations to establish infrastructures and strict criteria for the granting of licences; calls therefore on the competent authorities to remedy the situation and remove obstacles to the full development of 3G communications;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo lokacije za postavitve naprav in objektov mobilnega omrežja izbrane ob upoštevanju načel varovanja zdravja in okolja ter da bodo določene v preglednih postopkih urbanističnega načrtovanja; poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja te dejavnosti in o njih redno poroča Evropskemu parlamentu; poudarja potrebo po javni objavi informacij o vrednostih sevanja;
Calls on the Member States to ensure that the sites for installations intended to support the mobile telephony network are selected with due regard for health and the environment and in accordance with transparent urban planning procedures; calls on the Commission to monitor these activities and report on them regularly to the European Parliament; stresses the need for information on radiation values to be made public;
pozdravlja uvedbo prostovoljnih kod za zaščito uporabnikov pred nenaročenimi reklamnimi sporočili in poziva k prenosu načel o prostovoljnem uvrščanju na elektronske poštne sezname ("opt-in rules") v okviru celotne EU;
Welcomes the voluntary codes to protect users from unsolicited commercial communications and calls for EU-wide transposition of the opt-in rules;
poudarja pomen zasebnosti podatkov v zvezi z naraščanjem števila prošenj za shranjevanje podatkov ter ugotavlja že dolgo vzpostavljeno sodelovanje operaterjev elektronskih komunikacij z organi kazenskega pregona v jasno določenem pravnem okviru in obravnavi od primera do primera; priznava, da bi bilo obvezno shranjevanje podatkov ovira za državljanske svoboščine in vir precejšnjih stroškov za operaterje; zaključuje, da bi kakršne koli določbe o shranjevanju podatkov morale biti sprejete v okviru postopka soodločanja z Evropskim parlamentom;
Stresses the importance of data privacy in relation to the growing number of requests for data retention, and notes the long-established cooperation by e-communications operators with law-enforcement authorities within a clear legal framework and on a case-by-case basis; recognises that mandatory data-retention obligations would be detrimental to civil liberties and give rise to significant costs for operators; concludes that the introduction of any data-retention rules should be by way of codecision with the European Parliament;
poudarja, da je sektor informacijskih in komunikacijskih tehnologij (IKT) gonilna sila evropskega gospodarstva, ki bistveno prispeva k rasti in odpiranju novih delovnih mest;
Stresses that the information and communications technology (ICT) sector serves as an engine for the European economy, contributing significantly to growth and job creation;
opozarja, da je namen evropske zakonodaje o elektronskih komunikacijah spodbujati konkurenco med podjetji in hkrati zagotavljati visoko stopnjo zaščite uporabnikov;
Points out that European legislation on electronic communications seeks to promote competition among firms, while at the same time ensuring a high level of protection for consumers;
poziva Komisijo, naj za zaščito pravic uporabnikov izvede in Parlamentu predstavi redne študije, ki vključujejo analizo najmanj naslednjih parametrov: preglednost izstavljanja računov, pogodbena jamstva ter trendi cen in trgov za širokopasovno, fiksno in mobilno telefonijo;
Calls on the Commission to carry out and present to Parliament, with the aim of protecting users" rights, studies on a regular basis, in which, as a minimum, the following parameters are analysed: transparency of invoicing, contract guarantees and trends in prices and markets, for broadband and fixed and mobile telephony;
pozdravlja povečanje razvezanih lokalnih zank, vendar poudarja, da je potreben nadaljnji razvoj za zagotavljanje konkurenčnega trga za potrošnike;
Welcomes the increase in unbundled local loops, but stresses that there must be further development in order to ensure competitive markets for customers;
poziva ponudnike telekomunikacijskih storitev, naj upoštevajo tudi interese invalidov, ko gre za izbiro, ceno in ugodnosti glede kakovosti in dostopnosti telekomunikacijskih storitev, in poziva regulatorne organe, naj se posvetujejo s predstavniki invalidov, ko ocenjujejo te storitve;
Calls on telecommunications services providers to take account of the interests of disabled users as regards choice, price and benefits in terms of quality and accessibility of telecommunications services, and calls on the regulatory authorities to consult disabled people's representatives when assessing service provision;
poziva ponudnike storitev tretje generacije, da načrtujejo razmerja cene in storitve, ki bi širokopasovno povezavo približalo čim več uporabnikom in krajem, kot je mogoče, in tako odpravilo geografske meje širokopasovnih povezav;
Calls on 3G service providers to devise price-to-service ratios permitting broadband to be received by as many people in as many places as possible, thus putting an end to geographical borders for broadband;