natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj v naslednje poročilo vključi glavno poglavje, namenjeno malim in srednjim podjetjem ter konkurenci; opozarja na visoke stroške patentnega sistema za mala in srednja podjetja, ki izhajajo zlasti iz nevarnosti sodnih postopkov, ki jih sprožajo subjekti brez prakse; opozarja na odprto inovativnost in načelo skupnega znanja; poziva mala in srednja podjetja, naj izkoristijo rezultate sedmega okvirnega programa za raziskave z odprtim dostopom;
Calls on the Commission, in the next report, to include a dedicated focus chapter on SMEs and competition; points to the high cost of the patent system for SMEs, due in particular to the threat of litigation from non-practising entities; draws attention to open innovation and knowledge commons; calls on SMEs to exploit FP7 results under open access;
poziva Komisijo, naj kot pravno podlago za prihodnjo zakonodajo o notranjem trgu uporabi člen 12 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 153(2) Pogodbe ES), ki jasno določa, da se „pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju drugih politik in dejavnosti Unije upoštevajo zahteve varstva potrošnikov“;
Calls on the Commission to make use of Article 12 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (ex Article 153(2) of the EC Treaty), which states clearly that ‘consumer protection requirements shall be taken into account in defining and implementing other Union policies and activities’, as a legal basis for future internal market legislation;
poziva Komisijo, naj si prizadeva za izvajanje telekomunikacijskega svežnja;
Asks the Commission to push for the implementation of the telecom package;
meni, da je objava sporočila Komisije „Navodila glede prednostnih nalog izvrševanja Komisije pri uporabi člena 82 Pogodbe ES za izključevalna ravnanja, s katerimi prevladujoča podjetja zlorabljajo svoj položaj“ pozitivna, meni, da so navodila korak naprej, saj pomenijo večjo preglednost in predvidljivost možnih intervencij Komisije, čeprav ne bi smela nikoli omejiti ali zmanjšati zmožnosti Komisije, da na tem področju ukrepa v skladu z določbami Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Regards positively the publication of the Commission Communication entitled ‘Guidance on the Commission's enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 of the EC Treaty to abusive exclusionary conduct by dominant undertakings’; believes that the Guidance is a step forward since it means more transparency and predictability regarding a possible intervention by the Commission but that it should never limit or restrict the capacity of the Commission to act in that field under what is now the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
opozarja, da je bilo leta 2008 prvič v zgodovini politike konkurence v EU izrečeno plačilo denarne kazni zaradi neupoštevanja predhodne odločbe Komisije;
Highlights that in 2008, for the first time in the history of EU competition policy, coercive fines have been imposed for failure to comply with a previous Commission decision;
poudarja, da mora Komisija pozorno nadzorovati uporabo državne pomoči in s tem zagotoviti, da se takšna ureditev podpore ne bi uporabila za zaščito državne industrije na škodo notranjega trga in evropskih potrošnikov;
Stresses that it is important for the Commission to monitor the use of State aid carefully in order to ensure that these support arrangements are not used to protect national industries in a manner detrimental to the internal market and European consumers;
zato meni, da je pri ugotavljanju združljivosti državne pomoči s Pogodbo bistveno, da se poišče ustrezno ravnotežje med negativnimi učinki državne pomoči na konkurenco in javne finance ter njenimi pozitivnimi učinki v smislu skupnega interesa;
Considers it essential, therefore, when assessing whether State aid is compatible with the Treaty, to find the right balance between the negative effects of State aid on competition and public finances and its positive effects in terms of common interests;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni zunanjo razsežnost posledic predvidene bančne regulacije, zlasti za konkurenčnost evropskih bank;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the external dimension of the effects of the types of bank regulation envisaged, particularly on the competitiveness of European banks;
meni, da so sprejete politike državne pomoči v zvezi s finančnimi ustanovami in oživljanjem gospodarstva pomagale pri stabilizaciji finančnega trga in odpravljanju posledic kreditne krize na realno gospodarstvo;
Takes the view that State aid policies taken in relation to financial institutions and the economic recovery process were helpful to stabilise financial market and to tackle the effects of the credit crunch on the real economy;
ugotavlja, da je politika državne pomoči sestavni del konkurenčne politike in da nadzor državne pomoči odraža potrebo po ohranjanju enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vsa podjetja, ki delujejo na enotnem evropskem trgu; v tej zvezi se sprašuje, v kolikšni meri je državna pomoč za finančni trg privedla do izkrivljanja konkurence; poziva, naj se pripravi neodvisno poročilo o morebitnem izkrivljanju državnih intervencij v finančnem sektorju; poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o napredku pri prestrukturiranju, ki so ga dosegli prejemniki državne pomoči, ter naj zagotovi večjo jasnost glede vračanja te pomoči in morebitnih sankcij v primeru nevračila; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni obvezne ukrepe za prestrukturiranje v zvezi z možnim izkrivljanjem, ki bi povzročilo razlike v plačilnih pogojih med državami članicami; poziva k jasnejšim merilom odprodaje in njihovega srednjeročnega učinka na ta podjetja;
Notes that State aid policy is an integral part of competition policy and that State aid control reflects the need to maintain a level playing field for all undertakings carrying out activities in the European single market; in this context, wonders to what extent State aid granted to the financial market has caused distortions of competition; calls for an independent report to be drawn up about the potential distortive effects of State intervention in the financial sector; asks the Commission to report on restructuring progress made by the beneficiaries of State aid and to provide more clarity concerning the repayment of State aid and possible sanctions for failure to repay; urges the Commission to clarify the binding restructuring measures related to potential distortive effects resulting in differences in repayment conditions between Member States; calls for greater clarity on the criteria for divestments and on their medium-term impact on the firms in question;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi subvencij in izkrivljanj, do katerih prihaja zaradi jamstev za bančna posojila, ki jih podeljujejo vlade držav članic; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni obseg subvencij za jamstva za bančna posojila in tako analizira njihovo skladnost s konkurenčnim pravom EU in potrebne ukrepe za odpravo izkrivljanj zaradi teh jamstev;
Is concerned about the subsidies and distortions generated by the guarantees on bank funding granted by Member State governments; urges the Commission to assess the extent of subsidies related to guarantees on bank funding and thus analyse their conformity with EU competition law and the measures needed to correct any distortions related to those guarantees;
poziva Komisijo, naj nujno nadalje preuči, zakaj se državna pomoč, ki so je bile deležne banke, ne pretaka v realno gospodarstvo, in naj ukrepa proti tistim bankam, ki ugodnosti državne pomoči očitno niso posredovale naprej oziroma so to zavrnile;
Calls on the Commission to investigate further, as a matter of urgency, why State aid granted to banks is not being passed on to the real economy, and to take measures against banks that demonstrably fail or refuse to pass on the benefits of State aid;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija že sprožila proces opuščanja državne podpore in obveznega prestrukturiranja in odprodajanja; se zaveda, da so ti procesi lahko uspešni le, če bodo prožni; vseeno poziva k vodilni vlogi Komisije v teh procesih; meni, da se državne intervencije ne bi smele po nepotrebnem podaljševati in da je treba čim prej izdelati izstopne strategije;
Notes that the Commission has already started the process of phasing out State support and mandating restructuring and divestitures; acknowledges that those processes must be flexible in order to be successful; calls, nevertheless, for guidance by the Commission concerning those processes; believes that State intervention should not be unduly prolonged and that exit strategies should be elaborated as soon as possible;
vztraja, da je treba izstopne strategije usklajevati, zlasti pri opuščanju podpore bančnemu sektorju; poudarja, da je usklajevanje osrednjega pomena, da se izognemo izkrivljanju konkurence kot posledici položaja, ko bi bile banke subvencionirane v državah, ki bodo obdržale programe podpore, v primerjavi z državami, kjer bodo ti programi opuščeni;
Insists upon the need to coordinate exit strategies, in particular as regards the phasing out of the support to the banking sector; underlines that such coordination is essential to avoid any distortion of competition resulting from a situation where banks could be subsidised to some extent in those countries where bank support programmes are retained in contrast to countries where such programmes are phased out;
meni, da je sistem pravil konkurence doslej že preživel vihar, toda kriza je pokazala, da je nujno potreben okvir EU za čezmejno krizno upravljanje v finančnem sektorju, vključno z rešitvijo za ustanove, ki so „prevelike, da bi propadle“, ter hitra in celovita izvedba priporočil iz poročila de Larosière, vključno s skupnim evropskim regulatorjem, sistemom za zajamčene vloge in skladom za dofinanciranje ali enakovrednim sistemom;
Believes that the system of competition rules has weathered the storm so far, but that the crisis has brought home the urgent need for an EU framework for cross-border crisis management in the financial sector, including a solution for the ‘too-big-to-fail’ institutions, a quick and full implementation of the recommendations of the de Larosière Report, including a single European regulator, a deposit guarantee system and a bail-out fund or equivalent system;
poziva Komisijo, naj poroča o nacionalnih ukrepih državne pomoči, razlikami med nacionalnimi shemami in njihovimi morebitnimi negativnimi učinki na konkurenco in gospodarsko raznolikost; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za skladnejši, enotni evropski pristop;
Requests that the Commission report on national State aid measures, the differences between the national schemes, their possible distortive effects on competition and the economic divergence that might result therefrom; calls on the Commission to prepare proposals for a more coherent, single European approach;
poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši svojo preiskavo o možnosti nezakonitega združevanja državne pomoči in instrumentov Skupnosti, kot so strukturni skladi in sklad za prilagajanje globalizaciji, da bi bilo s tem njeno delovanje skladnejše;
Calls on the Commission to step up its investigation of the scope for illegally combining State aid on the one hand and Community instruments such as the structural funds and the Globalisation Adjustment Fund on the other, so as to ensure the consistency of its action;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, katera merila se bodo uporabila pri odločanju o morebitnem podaljšanju začasnega okvira Skupnosti za ukrepe državnih pomoči;
Invites the Commission to explain what criteria will be used to decide on a possible extension of the Temporary Community Framework for State aid measures;
vztraja, da bi morala biti državna pomoč skladna s cilji lizbonske in göteborške strategije ter podnebno-energetskega svežnja; države članice poziva, naj umaknejo škodljive subvencije, ki med drugim vplivajo na večjo porabo fosilnih goriv oziroma spodbujajo proizvodnjo, zaradi katere se večajo izpusti toplogrednih plinov; bolj splošno poudarja, da je za predvidene projekte znotraj svežnja za oživitev gospodarstva treba opraviti strateške okoljske presoje politik (SEA) in presoje vplivov na okolje (EIA);
Insists that State aid should be compatible with the goals of the Lisbon-Göteborg Strategy and the climate-energy package; urges Member States to remove harmful subsidies which, inter alia, foster fossil fuel consumption or production that increase greenhouse gas emission; more broadly, emphasises the need to undertake Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs) of policies and Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) of projects foreseen in the ambit of the recovery package;
pozdravlja nove smernice o državni pomoči za varstvo okolja v okviru podnebno-energetskega svežnja, ki za manjša vprašanja uvajajo standardizirano, za pomembnejša pa podrobno ocenjevanje;
Welcomes the new guidelines on State aid for environmental protection within the framework of the climate-energy package introducing normalised evaluation for minor issues and detailed evaluation for significant issues;
poziva Komisijo, naj med letom 2010 objavi izčrpno poročilo o učinkovitosti državne pomoči, dodeljene za „zeleno oživitev“ (kar je povzročilo velik premik k trajnosti, zlasti v avtomobilskem sektorju), in državne pomoči za varstvo okolja;
Calls on the Commission to publish, during the course of 2010, a comprehensive report on the effectiveness of State aid granted for ‘green recovery’ (bringing about a substantial shift towards sustainability, in particular in the automotive sector) and State aid for environmental protection;
poziva, naj se podobno poroča tudi za državno pomoč malim in srednjim podjetjem, usposabljanju, raziskavam in razvoju ter inovacijam;
Calls for similar reporting on State aid granted for support to SMEs, training, R&D and innovation;
predlaga, naj se pri opuščanju začasnega okvira Skupnosti za ukrepe državnih pomoči v podporo dostopu do financiranja ob trenutni finančni in gospodarski krizi upošteva gospodarski položaj (kako dolgo je gospodarsko oživljanje in kolikšen je bil padec BDP) posamezne države članice;
Suggests that the phase-out of the Temporary Community Framework for State aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis should take into consideration the economic situation (the length of recovery and the size of the fall in GDP) of the Member State concerned;
poziva Komisijo, naj v sektorju telekomunikacij poveča prizadevanja za doseg večje preglednosti pri tarifah operaterjev fiksne in zlasti mobilne telefonije;
Calls on the Commission to sustain, within the telecom sector, its efforts to achieve greater transparency in the charge rates for fixed and especially mobile operators;
poudarja, da je treba učinkovito preučiti izziv, ki ga davčne oaze in središča z ugodnim davčnim sistemom med drugim predstavljajo v povezavi z nelojalno konkurenco in finančno stabilnostjo;
Emphasises the need to look into the challenge presented by tax havens and off-shore centres as regards, inter alia, unfair competition and financial stability;
ponovno poziva k uvedbi skupne konsolidirane davčne osnove za pravne osebe;
Reiterates its call for the introduction of a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvesti o pregledu svoje odločbe o državni pomoči za javne storitve, ki bi morala biti objavljena 19. decembra 2008 in ki mora sedaj upoštevati začetek veljave Lizbonske pogodbe;
Urges the Commission to inform Parliament about its review of the Commission Decision on State aid for public services, which has been due since 19 December 2008 and which should now take into consideration the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je vračanje nezakonite državne pomoči dolgotrajen in zapleten proces in da je manjše število držav članic odgovorno za vse odprte tovrstne primere; spodbuja Komisijo, naj postopke še bolj poostri in na države članice vztrajno izvaja pritisk, zlasti na večkratne kršiteljice;
Notes with concern that the recovery of illegal State aid is a lengthy and cumbersome process, and that a small number of Member States is responsible for nearly all pending cases; encourages the Commission to tighten up procedures further and to keep up the pressure on Member States, in particular on repeat offenders;
poziva Komisijo, naj temeljito razišče splošno škodljivo gospodarsko strategijo nekaterih evropskih podjetij, ki z visokokvalificiranimi delavci sklepajo poceni pogodbe za določen delovni čas oziroma jih sprejemajo na prakso, s tem pa zlorabljajo načela dostojnega dela in izkrivljajo konkurenco;
Asks the Commission for a thorough investigation into the generalised large-scale use, by some European firms, of low-cost highly skilled temporary labour contracts and internships, as an abusive economic strategy that is detrimental to the principles of decent work and a source of competition distortion;
poudarja, da je možnost financiranja tveganega kapitala za mala in srednja podjetja osrednjega pomena za spodbujanje poštene konkurence;
Underlines that facilitating risk capital financing for SMEs is essential to promote fair competition;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, če in kako različne sheme državne pomoči v avtomobilski industriji prispevajo k drugim ciljem Skupnosti, zlasti k trajnosti in okolju prijaznim tehnologijam, ter o tem poroča; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj oceni konkurenčnost na tem trgu, zlasti odnos med proizvajalci originalne opreme in dobavitelji prvega in drugega reda;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate and report on the degree to which, if at all, the different national support schemes in the automobile industry have contributed to other Community objectives, in particular sustainability and environmentally-friendly technologies; urges the Commission to assess competitiveness within this market, in particular the relationship between OEMs and first- and second-tier suppliers;
pozdravlja objavo svežnja za poenostavitev;
Welcomes the publication of the Simplification Package;
pozdravlja sprejetje bele knjige komisije o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil; meni, da je to zmaga za varstvo potrošnikov v Evropski uniji;
Welcomes the adoption by the Commission of the White Paper on damages actions for breach of antitrust rules; believes this is a victory for consumer protection within the European Union;
opozarja, da karteli škodujejo gospodarstvu in pomenijo eno najresnejših kršitev konkurenčnega prava; meni, da so takšne kršitve konkurenčnega prava v nasprotju z interesi državljanov Unije, saj prednosti nižjih cen zaradi konkurence ne morejo doseči potrošnikov; glede tega ponavlja, da morajo vsi prihodnji predlogi o kolektivnih pravnih sredstvih upoštevati stališče, ki ga je Parlament izrazil v resoluciji z dne 26. marca 2009 o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES, in vztraja, da mora Parlament pri sprejemanju takšnih aktov sodelovati v postopku soodločanja;
Recalls that cartels harm the economy and represent some of the most serious violation of competition law; believes that such infringements of competition law counteract the interests of citizens of the Union since they imply that the advantages of lower prices resulting from competition cannot be passed on to consumers; reiterates in this context that any forthcoming proposal on collective redress must respect Parliament's view expressed in its resolution of 26 March 2009 on damages actions for breach of the EU antitrust rules and insists that Parliament must be involved in the adoption of such act by means of the co-decision procedure;
poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za večjo usklajenost med pobudami, ki jih pripravlja na področju konkurenčnega prava na eni strani in zakonodaje o varstvu potrošnikov na drugi;
Calls on the Commission to improve coordination between the competition law approach and the consumer law approach in its initiatives;
pozdravlja trdno stališče, ki ga je Komisija zavzela glede nekonkurenčnega ravnanja v zadnjih letih, saj je povzročilo veliko škode potrošnikom in gospodarstvu; poudarja, da politika konkurence potrebuje široko podporo javnosti in demokratično legitimnost, ki jo zagotavlja udeležba Evropskega parlamenta; je zaskrbljen, ker je kot edini instrument uporaba vse višjih glob morda neučinkovita, tudi glede morebitnih izgub delovnih mest zaradi nezmožnosti izplačila, in poziva k razvoju širšega obsega bolj razvitih instrumentov, ki bodo obsegali vprašanja kot so individualna odgovornost, preglednost in odgovornost podjetij, krajši postopki, pravica do zagovora in pravilnega procesa, mehanizmi za zagotovitev učinkovite obravnave prošenj za prizanesljivost (zlasti, da bi odpravili motnje, ki so jih povzročili postopki odkrivanja v ZDA), podjetniški programi za zagotavljanje skladnosti in razvoj evropskih standardov; podpira pristop „korenčka in palice“, ki bi učinkovito odvračal zlasti večkratne kršitelje, hkrati pa bi spodbujal delovanje po predpisih;
Welcomes the very firm stance the Commission has taken on anti-competitive behaviour in recent years, as it causes great harm to consumers and to the economy; highlights the need for broad public support for competition policy, and democratic legitimacy ensured by involvement of the European Parliament; is concerned that the use of ever higher fines as the sole instrument may be too blunt, not least with a view to potential job losses as a result of the inability to pay, and calls for the development of a wider range of more sophisticated instruments, covering such issues as individual responsibility, transparency and accountability of firms, shorter procedures, the right of defence and due process, mechanisms to ensure the effective operation of leniency applications (in particular to overcome the interference caused by discovery processes in the US), corporate compliance programs and the development of European standards; favours a ‘carrot-and-stick’ approach with penalties that serve as an effective deterrent, in particular for repeat offenders, while encouraging compliance;
meni, da so v primerih, ko isto podjetje večkrat krši konkurenčno pravo, potrebni strožji svarilni ukrepi za uveljavitev protimonopolnih pravil v kartelnih zadevah ali za preprečevanje zlorabe prevladujočega položaja;
Takes the view that, when multiple infringements of competition law are committed by the same company, stronger deterrence measures are needed to implement antitrust rules in cartel cases or to combat abuses of dominant position;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj uvedejo načelo individualne odgovornosti;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to introduce the principle of individual liability;
poziva Komisijo, naj razmisli o vlogi programov za skladnost kot instrument v boju proti nekonkurenčnemu ravnanju;
Calls on the Commission to consider the role of compliance programmes as an instrument in the fight against anti-competitive behaviour;
poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli merila za ugotavljanje, ali so podjetja dejansko delovala namerno ali so kršila iz malomarnosti;
Calls on the Commission to define specific criteria pursuant to which undertakings should be considered to have acted intentionally or negligently;
poziva Komisijo, naj jasno opredeli merila za ugotavljanje, ali so matična podjetja solidarno odgovorna za kartelno obnašanje njihovih odvisnih družb;
Calls on the Commission to define specific criteria pursuant to which parent companies should be made jointly and severally liable for cartel-like behaviour on the part of their subsidiaries;
poudarja, da nesorazmerne denarne kazni dosti bolj prizadenejo mala in srednja podjetja kot velike družbe;
Points out that SMEs are comparatively harder hit by disproportionate fines than larger companies;
meni, da bi morale biti denarne kazni sorazmerne s kršitvijo; predlaga tudi, naj se glede na okoliščine ustrezni zneski, plačani kot nadomestilo, upoštevajo pri izračunu denarne kazni; poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda podlago za izračunavanje denarnih kazni in naj ta nova načela po potrebi vključi v Uredbo (ES) št. 1/2003;
Feels that fines should be proportionate to the breach; also proposes that, in appropriate circumstances, relevant amounts paid in compensation be taken into account when calculating the fine; asks the Commission to review the basis for calculating fines and, if appropriate, to incorporate the new fining principles in Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;