natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uredba št. 689/2008/ES (uredba o PIC) uveljavlja Rotterdamsko konvencijo v Evropski uniji.
The Regulation 689/2008/EC (PIC-regulation) implements the Rotterdam Convention in the European Union.
Namen Rotterdamske konvencije je spodbujati izmenjavo informacij o kemikalijah v trgovini med pogodbenicami konvencije ter izvajati postopek soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju, kadar pogodbenica konvencije v drugo državo pogodbenico izvaža kemikalije, za katere velja konvencija.
The aim of the Rotterdam Convention is to promote information exchange about chemicals being traded between the Parties of the convention and also to implement the prior informed consent procedure when a Party of the Convention exports chemicals subject to the Convention to another Party of the Convention.
Postopek soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju je mehanizem, po katerem države izvoznice kemikalij pred izvozom uradno pridobijo soglasje držav uvoznic.
The prior informed consent procedure is a mechanism that ensures that exporting countries of chemicals formally obtain consent from the importing countries before the export can take place.
Ta postopek velja za kemikalije iz priloge III Rotterdamske konvencije, ki vključuje pesticide in industrijske kemikalije, ki so jih pogodbenice iz zdravstvenih ali okoljskih razlogov prepovedale ali strogo omejile in so jih sporočile pogodbenicam za vključitev v postopek soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju.
This procedure applies to the chemicals listed in the Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention, which covers pesticides and industrial chemicals that have been banned or severely restricted for health or environmental reasons by Parties and which have been notified by Parties for inclusion in the PIC procedure.
Uredba Evropske unije št. 689/2008/ES presega Rotterdamsko konvencijo, in sicer je vanjo vključenih več kemikalij kot na seznam Rotterdamske konvencije.
The Regulation 689/2008/EC the EU goes beyond the Rotterdam convention in the sense that the regulation includes more chemicals than the ones listed in the Rotterdam convention.
Poleg tega uredba uvaja postopek PIC za vse države, ki uvažajo navedene kemikalije iz EU in ne le države pogodbenice konvencije.
Furthermore the regulation applies the PIC-procedure for all countries that import the listed chemicals from the EU and not just countries that are Parties to the convention.
Komisija predlaga prenovitev uredbe o PIC, da bi 1) pojasnila nekatere opredelitve in uredbo uskladila z nedavno sprejeto kemijsko zakonodajo; 2) v izvajanje uredbe vključila Evropsko agencijo za kemikalije (ECHA); 3) spremenila določbe o zunanjem zastopanju Unije, tako da bo pri Rotterdamski konvenciji Unijo zastopala le Komisija in ne države članice; ter 4) spremenila predpise o soglasju po predhodnem obveščanju, da bi izvoznikom kemikalij, za katere velja uredba o PIC, olajšala izvoz v primerih, ko ni odgovora.
The Commissions has proposed a recast of the PIC-regulation in order to 1) clarify certain definitions and align the regulation with recent chemical legislation adopted recently, 2) involve the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in the implementation of the regulation, 3) change the provisions related to external representation of the Union so that it is only the Commission and not the member states who represents the Union in the Rotterdam Convention, and 4) change the rules of prior informed consent in order to make easier for exporters of chemicals regulated by the PIC-regulation to export in the cases where no response is forthcoming.
Glede postopka soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju Komisija predlaga spremembo člena 14(7), ki določa možnost za odstopanja od postopka soglasja za kemikalije iz delov 2 in 3 priloge 1 k uredbi.
With regards to the changes to the PIC-procedure the Commission makes a change to article 14 point 7 which specifies the possibility for derogations from the PIC-procedure for the chemicals listed in Annex 1 part 2 and 3 of the regulation.
Po sedanjem besedilu lahko izvozniki, ki v 60 dneh niso prejeli odgovora, kemikalijo izvozijo, če je ta kemikalija dokazano licencirana, odobrena ali registrirana v državi uvoznici.
The current text allows for exporters that have not received a response within 60 days to export the chemical if there is prove that it is licensed, authorized or registered in the importing country.
Komisija pri prenovitvi predlaga, da se doda besedilo, ki izvoznikom dovoljuje izvoz, če se je kemikalija v zadnjih petih letih uporabljala v državi uvoznici ali se vanjo izvažala.
In the recast the Commission proposes to add text allowing exporters to export if the chemical has been used in or imported into the importing country within the last five years.
Komisija trdi, da je ta sprememba potrebna, saj v 30 % ni mogoče nadaljevati izvažanja kemikalij iz delov 2 in 3 Priloge I, saj ni bilo mogoče prejeti odgovora države uvoznice.
The Commission argues that this change is necessary as 30 % of the exports of the chemicals listed in Annex I part 2 and 3 cannot proceed because it has not been possible to obtain an answer from the importing country.
Po mnenju Komisije je pogost razlog za to dejstvo, da je Evropska unija v uredbo o PIC vključila več kemikalij, kot pa jih je na seznamu Rotterdamske konvencije, zaradi česar se države uvoznice ne odzovejo ali ne odgovorijo za kemikalije, ki niso navedene v konvenciji.
The Commission is of the opinion that this is often due to the fact that the EU has included more chemicals in the PIC-regulation than the ones listed in the Rotterdam Convention and thus importing countries do not react or respond to chemicals that are not listed in the Convention.
Poročevalec podpira predlog Komisije v delu, ki pojasnjuje nekatere opredelitve v uredbi in v njeno izvajanje vključuje Evropsko konvencijo za kemikalije (ECHA).
Your rapporteur can support the Commissions proposal in so far that it clarifies certain definitions in the regulation and involves the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in the implementation of the regulation.
Če imamo evropsko agencijo, potem jo je treba uporabiti in povsem logično je, da ECHA prevzame precej odgovornosti za izvajanje te uredbe.
When we have a European Agency we should make use of it and therefore it is only logical that ECHA takes over much of the responsibility for implementing the regulation.
Poročevalec se ne strinja s predlogom Komisije v delu, ki omogoča več odstopanj od postopka soglasja po predhodnem obveščanju pri izvozu kemikalij v tretje države.
Your rapporteur does not agree with the Commissions proposal in so far that it widens the possibility for derogations from the PIC-procedure when exporting chemicals to third countries.
Kemikalije iz delov 2 ali 3 Priloge I uredbe o PIC so v Evropski uniji prepovedane ali zelo omejene, za kar obstaja razlog.
The chemicals listed in Annex I part 2 or 3 in the PIC-regulation are either banned or very restricted in the European Union.
Komisija trdi, da se država morda zato ne odzove na prošnjo za uvoz, ker se organom v tej državi ne zdi potrebno odgovoriti na prošnje za kemikalije, ki niso navedene v Rotterdamski konvenciji, ampak le v zakonodaji Evropske unije.
The Commission argues that if a country does not respond to an export request it might be because the authorities in that country do not feel the need to respond to requests regarding chemicals that are not listed in the Rotterdam Convention but only in the EU-legislation.
To morda velja za nekatere primere.
This might sometimes be the case.
Lahko pa se zgodi, da ima država zelo šibko upravo, ki se ni sposobna pravočasno odzvati ali ne ve, kako obravnavati tako prošnjo.
But it might also be the case that the country has a very weak administration and is therefore not capable to respond in time or does not know how to deal with the request.
V tem primeru je zelo problematično dovoliti izvoz nevarnih kemikalij v te države.
If this is the case it seems very problematic to allow the export of dangerous chemicals to these countries.
Če se njihova uprava ni sposobna odzvati na prošnjo za izvoz, potem najverjetneje ne bo sposobna zaščititi državljanov ali okolja pred nevarnimi kemikalijami.
If their administration is not able to react to an export request it is not likely that the same administration is able to protect the citizens or the environment from dangerous chemicals.
Vendar ni naša naloga omogočati izvoz nevarnih kemikalij, da bi tem proizvajalcem zagotovili dohodek.
But it is not our role to facilitate this export of dangerous chemicals in order to secure revenue for these producers.
Cilj Rotterdamske konvencije je „varovati zdravje ljudi in okolje“(člen 1).
The objective of the Rotterdam Convention is to protect "human health and the environment" (article 1).
Z dodajanjem odstopanj v uredbi, ki izvaja konvencijo, ne bomo uresničili tega cilja.
We are not securing this objective by adding derogations to the regulation which implements the Convention.
Zato poročevalec predlaga omejitev odstopanj od postopka o soglasju po predhodnem obveščanju, saj je Evropska unija dolžna zagotoviti, da kemikalije, ki jih izvaža, ne povzročajo nepotrebne škode ljudem ali okolju.
Therefore your rapporteur suggests that we limit the derogations from the PIC-procedure, as it is the responsibility of the EU to ensure that the chemicals we export do not cause unnecessary harm to humans or the environment.
ODBOR ZA PRAVNE ZADEVE
COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRES
Predsednik Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane
Chair of the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
Zadeva : Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij (prenovitev)
Subject : Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals (recast)
Spoštovani predsednik
Dear Chairman,
V tem primeru so, poleg pogojev iz členov 156 57, v pristojnem odboru dopustni predlogi sprememb le, če zadevajo tiste dele predloga, ki vsebujejo spremembe.
In such a case, over and above the conditions laid down in Rules 156 and 157, amendments shall be admissible within the committee responsible only if they concern those parts of the proposal which contain changes.
Vendar, če namerava pristojni odbor predložiti tudi predloge sprememb za kodificirane dele predloga v skladu s točko 8 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, o tem nemudoma obvesti Svet in Komisijo, slednja pa še pred glasovanjem v skladu s členom 54 odbor obvesti o svojem stališču glede predlogov sprememb in o tem, ali namerava umakniti predlog za prenovitev.“
However, if in accordance with point 8 of the Interinstitutional Agreement , the committee responsible intends also to submit amendments to the codified parts of the proposal, it shall immediately notify its intention to the Council and to the Commission, and the latter should inform the committee, prior to the vote pursuant to Rule 54, of its position on the amendments and whether or not it intends to withdraw the recast proposal."
Odbor za pravne zadeve po razpravi na svoji seji 22. novembra 2011 z 19 glasovi za in nobenim vzdržanim
In conclusion, after discussing it at its meeting of 22 November 2011, the Committee on Legal Affairs, by 19 votes in favour and no abstention
Prisotni so bili naslednji poslanci: Klaus-Heiner Lehne (predsednik), Luigi Berlinguer (podpredsednik), Raffaele Baldassarre (podpredsednik), Evelyn Regner (podpredsednik), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (podpredsednik), Philippe Boulland, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland. priporoča vašemu odboru kot pristojnemu odboru, naj nadaljuje preučevanje omenjenega predloga v skladu s členom 87.
The following Members were present : Klaus-Heiner Lehne (Chair), Luigi Berlinguer (Vice-Chair), Raffaele Baldassarre (Vice-Chair), Evelyn Regner (Vice-Chair), Sebastian Valentin Bodu (Vice-Chair), Philippe Boulland, Christian Engström, Marielle Gallo, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland. , recommends that your Committee, as the committee responsible, proceed to examine the above proposal in accordance with Rule 87.
Bruselj, 18. julij 2011
Brussels, 18 July 2011
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals
COM(2011)0245 z dne 5. maja 2011 – 2011/0105(COD)
COM(2011)0245 of 5.5.2011 – 2011/0105(COD)
V skladu z Medinstitucionalnim sporazumom z dne 28. novembra 2001 o bolj sistematičnem ponovnem sprejemu pravnih aktov, še zlasti z odstavkom 9, se je posvetovalna skupina, ki jo sestavljajo pravne službe Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije, srečala 23. maja in 23. junija 2011, da bi med drugim proučila omenjeni predlog, ki ga je predstavila Komisija.
Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 23 May and 23 June 2011 for the purpose of examining, among others, the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
Posvetovalna delovna skupina je na teh srečanjih po proučitvi
At those meetings
Posvetovalna skupina je imela na voljo angleško, francosko in nemško jezikovno različico predloga, svoje delo pa je opravila na podlagi angleške različice, ki je izvirna različica obravnavanega besedila. predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta za prenovitev Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij soglasno ugotovila kot sledi.
The Consultative Working Party had at its disposal the English, French and German language versions of the proposal and worked on the basis of the English version, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council recasting Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1) Da bi bil obrazložitveni memorandum v celoti pripravljen v skladu z zadevnimi zahtevami iz medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, bi morali biti v tem dokumentu podani razlogi za vsako predlagano vsebinsko spremembo, kot je določeno v točki 6(a)(ii) navedenega sporazuma, ter navedene določbe predhodnega akta, ki ostajajo v predlogu nespremenjene, kot je določeno v točki 6(a)(iii) navedenega sporazuma.
1) As regards the explanatory memorandum, in order to be drafted in full compliance with the relevant requirements laid down by the Inter-institutional Agreement such a document should have stated the reasons for each proposed substantive amendment, as is provided for under point 6(a)(ii) of that agreement, and should have specified which provisions of the earlier act remain unchanged in the proposal, as is provided for under point 6(a)(iii).
2) Naslednje spremembe, predlagane v prenovljenem besedilu, bi morale biti označene s sivo osenčeno pisavo, ki se navadno uporablja za označevanje vsebinskih sprememb:
2) The following changes proposed in the recast text should have been identified by using the grey-shaded type generally used for marking substantive changes:
– v členu 1(2) črtanje besed „ Direktive Sveta 67/548/EGS “;
- in Article 1(2), the deletion of the words " of Council Directive 67/548/EEC ";
– v točki (1) člena 3 črtanje besed „ kakor je opredeljena v Direktivi 67/548/EGS “;
- in point (1) of Article 3, the deletion of the words " as defined in Directive 67/548/EEC ";
– v členu 4, drugi odstavek, zamenjava datuma 1. november 2008, ki se nahaja v trenutno veljavnem besedilu člena 4, drugi odstavek, Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008, z novim datumom po objavi prenovljenega akta;
- in Article 4, second paragraph, the replacement of the date of 1 November 2008, appearing in the currently applicable text of Article 4, second paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008, with a new date following the publication of the recast act;
– v členu 5(1), prvi pododstavek, črtanje besed „ in obveščanje o izvozu “, ki se trenutno nahajajo v členu 5(2), prvi pododstavek, Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008;
- in Article 5(1), first subparagraph, the deletion of the words " and the export notification " currently appearing in Article 5(2), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008;
– v členu 8(2), prvi pododstavek, zamenjava obstoječega roka 30 dni, ki se nahaja v členu 7(2), prvi pododstavek, Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008, z novim rokom 20 delovnih dni;
- in Article 8(2), first subparagraph, the replacement of the existing deadline of 30 days appearing in Article 7(2), first subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008, with a different deadline consisting of 20 working days;
– v členu 8(2), tretji pododstavek, zamenjava obstoječega roka 15 dni, ki se nahaja v členu 7(2), tretji pododstavek, Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008, z novim rokom 1 delovnih dni;
- in Article 8(2), third subparagraph, the replacement of the existing deadline of 15 days appearing in Article 7(2), third subparagraph, of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008, with a different deadline consisting of 10 working days;
– v členu 8(3) zamenjava obstoječega roka 30 dni, ki se nahaja v členu 7(3) Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008, z novim rokom 20 delovnih dni;
- in Article 8(3), the replacement of the existing deadline of 30 days appearing in Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008, with a different deadline consisting of 20 working days;
– v členu 31, prvi odstavek, zamenjava datuma 1. avgust 2009, ki se nahaja v členu 18, prvi odstavek, Uredbe (ES) št. 689/2008, z novim datumom po objavi prenovljenega akta.
- in Article 31, first paragraph, the replacement of the date of 1 August 2009, appearing in Article 18, first paragraph, of Regulation (EC) No 689/2008, with a new date following the publication of the recast act.
3) V prilogah I in V niso prevzete zadnje spremembe iz dveh uredb, ki jih je pred kratkim sprejela Komisija.
3) In Annexes I and V, the latest amendments originating from two regulations recently adopted by the Commission were not reproduced.
Te nedavne spremembe bi bilo treba vključiti v osnutek prenovljenega besedila.
Those recent amendments should be introduced into the draft recast text.
Dva zadevna akta o spremembah sta Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 186/2011 z dne 25. februarja 2011 o spremembi Priloge I k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij in Uredba Komisije (EU) št. 214/2011 z dne 3. marca 2011 o spremembi Prilog I in V k Uredbi (ES) št. 689/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvozu in uvozu nevarnih kemikalij.
The two amending acts concerned are Commission Regulation (EU) No 186/2011 of 25 February 2011 amending Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals and Commission Regulation (EU) No 214/2011 of 3 March 2011 amending Annexes I and V to Regulation (EC) No 689/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the export and import of dangerous chemicals.
Kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb predhodnega akta s temi vsebinskimi spremembami, je delovna skupina ugotovila, da je omenjena kodifikacija nepopolna, ker ne vključuje sprememb iz točke 3.
As regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, the Working Party concluded that the said codification is incomplete in so far as it does not incorporate the amendments referred to in point 3.
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Chris Davies, Esther de Lange, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Andres Perello Rodriguez, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Kārlis Šadurskis, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
János Áder, Elena Oana Antonescu, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Pilar Ayuso, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Chris Davies, Esther de Lange, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Karl-Heinz Florenz, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Julie Girling, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Peter Liese, Linda McAvan, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Antonyia Parvanova, Andres Perello Rodriguez, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Kārlis Šadurskis, Carl Schlyter, Horst Schnellhardt, Richard Seeber, Theodoros Skylakakis, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Sabine Wils, Marina Yannakoudakis
João Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Jutta Haug, Mairead McGuinness, Alojz Peterle, Christel Schaldemose, Mihalis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Peter van Dalen, Andrea Zanoni
João Ferreira, Matthias Groote, Jutta Haug, Mairead McGuinness, Alojz Peterle, Christel Schaldemose, Michail Tremopoulos, Peter van Dalen, Andrea Zanoni
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Protokola k Evro-sredozemskemu pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Kraljevine Maroko v programih Unije
on the Proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of a Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, on a framework agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the general principles for the participation of Kingdom of Morocco in Union programmes
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (12712/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (12712/2010),
– ob upoštevanju Protokola k Evro-sredozemskemu pridružitvenemu sporazumu med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani ter Kraljevino Maroko na drugi strani o Okvirnem sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Maroko o splošnih načelih za sodelovanje Kraljevine Maroko v programih Unije (12712/2010),
– having regard to the Protocol to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, on a framework agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the general principles for the participation of Morocco in Union programmes (12711/2010),
– ob upoštevanju prošnje za odobritev, ki jo je Svet podal v skladu s členom 217, v povezavi s točko (a) člena 218(6) ter drugim pododstavkom člena 218(8) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0430/2010 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 217, Article 218(6)(a) and Article 218(8), second subparagraph, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0430/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0016/2012 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0016/2012 ),