natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za preprečevanje različnih razlag držav članic glede pravil ESB in pozdravlja začetek seminarjev o dobri praksi, kjer so predstavljene izkušnje, ki so si jih nekatere države članice pridobile, zlasti novim državam članicam, ki so o ESB manj obveščene;
Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to prevent different interpretations of ERF rules by Member States, and welcomes the launch of seminars on good practice disseminating experience gained in some Member States to others, in particular to new Member States still less familiar with the ERF;
poziva Komisijo, naj na vse možne načine pospeši plačila državam članicam in poveča njihovo ozaveščenost glede potrebe po pravočasnem nakazovanju plačil, zlasti za manjše upravičence, da se tako ne ogrozi inovativnih projektov in se omogoči sodelovanje pri ESB III tudi nevladnim organizacijam z majhnim proračunom;
Invites the Commission to do everything possible to speed up payments to Member States and to raise awareness among Member States of the need to disburse payments, in particular for smaller beneficiaries, in time in order not to endanger innovative projects and to allow also NGOs with a smaller budget backing to participate in ERF III;
vztraja, naj nacionalne izjave o zanesljivosti zajamejo vsa področja, na katerih so države članice soodgovorne za porabo sredstev EU, na primer ESB;
Insists that national declarations of assurance should cover all areas where Member States are co-responsible for the spending of EU funds, e.g. the ERF;
poziva generalni direktorat za proračun, naj ponovno preuči svoje prakse izterjave, saj izterjava prek nesorodnih projektov zavira delovanje specifičnega programa (zlasti, kadar povzroči pozna plačila vnaprej financiranih zneskov); namesto samodejne izterjave iz katerega koli prihodnjega plačila zadevne države članice, so nalogi za izterjavo izdani ministrstvu za finance te države članice;
Invites the Directorate General for Budget to reconsider its practice of recoveries, as recovery via non-related projects is counterproductive to the functioning of specific programmes (in particular resulting in late payments of pre-financing amounts); recovery orders should be issued to the Ministry of Finance of the Member State concerned, rather than automatically recovering from any upcoming payment to that Member State;
poziva Komisijo, naj sredstva ESB uporablja na bolj proaktiven način, da se tako spodbudi napredek na področju skupne azilne politike;
Invites the Commission to use the ERF even more proactively, in order to enhance progress towards a Common Policy on Asylum;
poziva Komisijo, naj si še naprej prizadeva za zagotavljanje uskladitve statističnih podatkov, da tako prepreči izkrivljanja pri programih, kjer je pravilna dodelitev sredstev odvisna od statističnih podatkov, ki jih predloži Eurostat;
Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to ensure the harmonisation of statistical data in order to avoid distortions with programmes where the sound distribution of funds depends on statistical data provided by Eurostat;
pozdravlja objavo posebnega poročila št. 4/2007 in odločno poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva pomanjkljivosti, ki so opredeljene v njem, ter sprejme ukrepe v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča;
Welcomes the publication of Special Report 4/2007 and urges the Commission to take on board the shortcomings identified in the report, as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA;
soglaša s Komisijo, da mora do izplačila zadnjega izvoznega nadomestila "ostati v veljavi popolnoma delujoč kontrolni sistem"; zato od nje pričakuje, da v skladu s pristojnostjo dajanja pobud pripravi konkretne predloge za izboljšanje razmer;
Agrees with the Commission that until the last export refund is paid, "a fully operational control system must remain in place"; expects therefore the Commission to use its power of initiative to come up with concrete proposals in order to improve the situation;
s tem v zvezi pozdravlja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 14/2008 z dne 17. decembra 2007 o spremembi Uredbe (EGS) št. 386/90 o opravljanju nadzora pri izvozu kmetijskih proizvodov, za katere se dobijo izvozna nadomestila ali drugi zneski UL L 8, 11.1.2008, str.
Welcomes in this respect Council Regulation (EC) No 14/2008 of 17 December 2007 amending Regulation (EEC) No 386/90 on the monitoring carried out at the time of export of agricultural products receiving refunds or other amounts OJ L 8, 11.1.2008, p.
, ki državam članicam, ki uporabljajo analizo tveganja, omogoča, da določijo 5 % stopnjo pregledov na državo članico namesto na carinski urad; vendar obžaluje, da odgovori Komisije glede prihodnjih predlogov ne vključujejo jasnega časovnega okvira, zlasti glede na to, da je do odprave izvoznih nadomestil še zelo malo časa;
, which enables Member States which apply risk analysis to set the control rate to 5% per Member State instead of per customs office; regrets however the lack of a clear timeline in the Commission's replies regarding its future proposals, given the short time prior to the phasing-out of export refunds;
obžaluje številne pomanjkljivosti, ki zmanjšujejo učinkovitost fizičnih pregledov, zlasti predvidljivost pregledov, pogoste preglede izvoznega blaga z nizkim tveganjem in nizko vrednostjo ter metode, ki se uporabljajo pri pregledu pošiljk razsutega tovora;
Deplores the several weaknesses reducing the effectiveness of physical checks, in particular the predictability of checks, the high number of low value and low risk exports being checked as well as the method used to check bulk shipments of goods;
kar zadeva preglede zamenjave, obžaluje nenatančnost pregledov in različne ocene držav članic o tem, koliko pregledov je treba opraviti;
As far as substitution checks are concerned, regrets that the checks were not detailed enough and that the interpretation of the number of checks to be made varied between Member States;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija zagotovila ustrezen obseg ključnih kontrol pri spremljanju pregledov; vendar soglaša s pomisleki Računskega sodišča glede tega, da se Komisija ni odzvala s pripravo zakonodajnih sprememb ali pravočasnih finančnih popravkov, kljub temu, da je bila s pomanjkljivostmi seznanjena že precej časa;
Welcomes the adequate coverage of key controls by the Commission when monitoring the checks; however shares the ECA's concerns that the Commission has not reacted, with legislative changes or timely financial corrections, despite the fact that it was aware of the weaknesses for some considerable time;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da na vzhodnih mejah Evropske unije pristojni organi preverjajo neoporečnost oznak, in spodbuja druge države članice k enakemu ravnanju;
Notes and welcomes the fact that the integrity of seals is verified by the competent authorities at the Eastern borders of the EU, and encourages the other Member States to follow this example;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje prizadevanja za spremembo ustrezne zakonodaje in obravnavo vprašanja o pregledih "tail-gate" ter uvede obvezno uporabo analize tveganja za izvozne postopke v skladu z oceno Računskega sodišča;
Invites the Commission to continue its efforts to modify the relevant legislation with a view of addressing, among others, the issue of "tail-gate inspections", and to introduce the obligatory use of risk analysis for export procedures, in line with the ECA's assessment;
Del V: Posebno poročilo št. 5/2007 o upravljanju programa CARDS s strani Komisije
Part V: Special Report 5/2007 on the Commission's management of the CARDS programme
meni, da je program CARDS veliko prispeval k politiki stabilizacije in približevanja;
Considers that the CARDS programme has made an important contribution to the stabilisation and rapprochement policy;
obžaluje visoko stopnjo pomanjkanja preglednosti pri upravljanju, ki ga izvaja Komisija in njene delegacije, kar onemogoča ocenjevanje; meni, da je nedopustno, da Komisija nima pregleda nad projekti, financiranimi iz programa CARDS, medtem ko je Evropska agencija za obnovo (EAR) javnosti dala na razpolago seznam sklenjenih pogodb z navedbo programov in projektov;
Regrets the considerable lack of transparency in management by the Commission and its delegations, which renders an evaluation impossible; considers it unacceptable that the Commission has no overview of the projects funded under CARDS, whereas the European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR) has made available to the public the list of contracts it has signed, specifying programmes and projects;
opozarja na priporočila iz svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2007, ki spremlja sklep o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna agencije za obnovo za proračunsko leto 2005 UL L 187, 15.7.2008, str.
Recalls the recommendations set out in its resolution of 24 April 2007 accompanying the decision on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the EAR for the financial year 2005 OJ L 187, 15.7.2008, p.
in zlasti na točko 23;
, and in particular point 23 thereof;
je presenečen nad ugotovitvijo, da je bila v državah, kjer je bilo upravljanje CARDS pod okriljem agencije za obnovo, sama agencija zadolžena za načrtovanje instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA) v letih 2007 in 2008 ter za pripravo javnih razpisov, ki zahtevajo podpis Komisije; s tem v zvezi opozarja, da je to v nasprotju z mandatom agencije in da je zlasti postopek priprave javnih razpisov podoben praksi uradov za tehnično pomoč (TAO), ki jih je Parlament obsodil in so od takrat zaprti;
Is very surprised to learn that, in the countries where CARDS was under the auspices of the EAR, the Agency alone is responsible for the programming of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) for 2007 and 2008 and for the preparation of tenders requiring the Commission's signature; notes that this is contrary to the EAR's mandate and that, in particular, the procedure for the preparation of tenders resembles the practice of "TAOs" (Technical Assistance Offices), which were condemned by Parliament and have since been closed down;
s tem v zvezi meni, da Komisija v letu 2006 ni izpolnila obveznosti, ki izhajajo iz njenega sklepa iz leta 2005 o postopni ukinitvi agencije za obnovo, ki določa, da morajo delegacije Komisije v različnih balkanskih državah prevzeti polne pristojnosti od začetka izvajanja instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč;
Is of the opinion, in this context, that the Commission did not meet in 2006 the obligations arising from its own decision taken in 2005 on the phasing out of the EAR, which provided that the Commission delegations in the various Balkan countries should take full charge from the beginning of the IPA;
zahteva, naj Računsko sodišče izvede naknadno revizijo, ki bo osredotočena na primerjavo med upravljanjem programa CARDS s strani Komisije in upravljanjem tega programa, ki ga v imenu Komisije opravlja Evropska agencija za obnovo, ter njene rezultate predloži Parlamentu do septembra 2008;
Requests the ECA to carry out a follow up audit focusing on a comparison between the Commission's management of the CARDS programme and the EAR's management of this programme on behalf of the Commission, the results of which should be presented to Parliament by September 2008;
pozdravlja objavo poročila in čestita Računskemu sodišču za njegov dragocen doprinos pri obravnavanju tega zelo pomembnega vprašanja evropske politike;
Welcomes the publication of the report and congratulates the ECA for its most valuable contribution in addressing this very important issue of European policy;
strogo upošteva kritike Računskega sodišča in meni, da morajo pripeljati do dolgoročnih sprememb politike;
Takes a serious view of the ECA's criticisms and considers that they should result in far-reaching changes of policy;
pozdravlja izražen namen Komisije, da vključi pomanjkljivosti, opredeljene v poročilu, in da sprejme ukrepe v skladu s priporočili Računskega sodišča; obžaluje pa, da Komisija v svojih odgovorih ni jasno določila časovnega obdobja za prihodnje predloge;
Welcomes the Commission's declared intention to take on board those shortcomings identified in the report, as well as to take action in line with the recommendations of the ECA; regrets however the lack of a clear timeline in the Commission's replies as to its future proposals;
pozdravlja pobudo slovenskega predsedstva, da se za obravnavanje tega poročila18. februarja 2008 skliče izredno sejo Sveta za ribištvo o nadzoru ribištva;
Welcomes the Slovenian Presidency's initiative of calling an Extraordinary Fisheries Council at the Fisheries Control of 18 February 2008 to discuss this report;
ponovno potrjuje, da dobro upravljanje virov v skladu s previdnostnim načelom in načelom trajnostnega razvoja zahteva okrepitev obstoječih mehanizmov nadzora, da se državi zastave in obalni državi, kjer plovila izvajajo dejavnosti, omogoči dostop do informacij v realnem času o položaju plovila in ribolovnih dejavnostih, ki se izvajajo, kadar to želita;
Reaffirms that sound management of resources in line with the precautionary principle and the principle of sustainable development requires the strengthening of existing control mechanisms so that the flag State and the coastal State where vessels are operating can access information in real time on the vessel's location and the fishing operations being carried out whenever they wish;
ob pregledu Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2847/93 z dne 12. oktobra 1993 o oblikovanju nadzornega sistema na področju skupne ribiške politike (nadzorna uredba) UL L 261, 20.10.1993, str.
Calls on the Commission, at the same time, when revising Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (the Control Regulation) OJ L 261, 20.10.1993, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1098/2007 (UL L 248, 22.9.2007, str.
Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 (OJ L 248, 22.9.2007, p.
, poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ukrepe za zagotavljanje kakovosti in zanesljivosti podatkov o ulovu;
, to propose measures to guarantee the quality and reliability of catch data;
ugotavlja, da poleg kontrolnih mehanizmov obstaja temeljni problem, zlasti glede stopnje ribolovnih kvot, o katerih so se dogovorile države članice; poudarja, da je nesprejemljivo, da države članice vsako leto postavljajo višje kvote od tistih, ki jih priporočajo raziskave o trajnostnem ribolovu;
Observes that there is a fundamental problem in addition to control mechanisms, namely regarding the levels of fishing quotas negotiated by the Member States; stresses that it is unacceptable for Member States, year after year, to set quotas at a higher level than recommended by researchers for sustainable fisheries;
poudarja, da je sistem dogovorjenih kvot poleg kontrolnih mehanizmov temeljni problem; meni, da ni zadovoljivo, da se vsako leto določajo kvote, višje od tistih, ki jih priporočajo raziskovalci, da bi ohranili obnovljiv ribji stalež;
Stresses that, in addition to control mechanisms, the system of negotiated quotas is a fundamental problem; considers it unsatisfactory that, year after year, quotas are consistently set higher than researchers recommend in order to maintain viable fish stocks;
ECR 2005, str.I-6263.
[2005] ECR I-6263.
, ki je za Skupnost pomenila jasno potrditev vloge in obveznosti držav članic v zvezi z nadzorom in izvrševanjem pravil skupne ribiške politike;
, which has provided the Community with a clear confirmation of the role and obligations of Member States with regard to control and enforcement of common fisheries policy (CFP) rules;
vendar ugotavlja, da je od ugotovitve kršitev in sprejetja te odločitve preteklo 21 let in da trajnost evropskega ribištva ne more prenesti takšnih časovnih zamikov pri odpravljanju nepravilnosti;
Notes, however, that 21 years have elapsed between the time when the infringements were detected and the time of this decision, and that the sustainability of European fisheries cannot cope with such time lags in correcting wrongdoings;
poudarja pomen ukrepov Komisije proti posameznim državam članicam, ko obstaja sum, da kršijo ali ne upoštevajo sistemov kontrol, pregledov ali kazni skupne ribiške politike;
Stresses the importance of action by the Commission against individual Member States where there is a suspicion that they are violating or ignoring the control, inspection or sanctions systems of the CFP;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za preučitev možnosti, da bi se v predvidene nove pobude glede nezakonitega, nereguliranega in neprijavljenega ribolova vključile usklajene upravne sankcije, ki bi se uporabile za nekatere posebne kršitve takšnega ribolova;
Welcomes the Commission initiative to explore the possibility of including in the proposed new initiatives regarding illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU) fishing harmonised administrative sanctions to be applied for certain specific 'IUU-offences';
pozdravlja sporočilo, ki ga je pred kratkim sprejela Komisija in s katerim je sprožila razpravo o izboljšanju kazalnikov ribolovne zmogljivosti in napora na podlagi skupne ribiške politike ( KOM(2007)0039 ), ter zato od Komisije pričakuje, da bo uporabila svojo pristojnost dajanja pobud in pripravila konkretne predloge za resnično izboljšanje skupne ribiške politike;
Welcomes the communication from the Commission launching a debate on improving fishing capacity and effort indicators under the common fisheries ( COM(2007)0039 );
opaža in pozdravlja dejstvo, da je po objavi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št 1966/2006 z dne 21. decembra 2006 o elektronskem zapisovanju in poročanju podatkov o ribolovnih dejavnostih ter daljinskem zaznavanju UL L 409, 30.
Notes and welcomes the fact that after publication of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 of 21 December 2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing OJ L 409, 30.
Komisija nemudoma pripravila izvedbena pravila (Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 1566/2007 z dne 21. decembra 2007 o določitvi podrobnih pravil za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1966/2006 o elektronskem zapisovanju in poročanju podatkov o ribolovnih dejavnostih ter daljinskem zaznavanju UL L 340, 22.12.2007, str.
, the Commission immediately prepared its implementing rules (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1566/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1966/2006 on electronic recording and reporting of fishing activities and on means of remote sensing OJ L 340, 22.12.2007, p.
obžaluje, da čeprav Komisija predlaga razmeroma preproste ureditve napora, ki jih je mogoče nadzirati, je sistem postal precej bolj zapleten zaradi velikega števila odstopanj, ki so bila uvedena na zahtevo držav članic med razpravami v Svetu in ki so občutno zmanjšala zmožnost nadziranja celotnega sistema;
Regrets that, even if the Commission proposed rather simple and controllable effort regimes, the system was made considerably more complicated, due to a high number of derogations introduced on request by Member States during discussions in Council and which have reduced considerably the controllability of the whole system;
meni, da je veljavni zakonodajni okvir prezapleten in ni posodobljen, ter poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi svojo pristojnost dajanja pobud in pripravi konkretne predloge za izboljšanje razmer z namenom poenostavitve in uskladitve zakonodaje skupne ribiške politike;
Considers that the current legislative framework is too complex and not up to date and urges the Commission to use its power of initiative to come up with concrete proposals in order to improve the situation with the aim of simplification and harmonisation of CFP legislation;
obžaluje več pomanjkljivosti, ki zmanjšujejo učinkovitost fizičnih pregledov, in napake v sistemu prenosa podatkov kot celoti v državah članicah ter pomanjkanje evropske kulture nadzora v ribiškem sektorju;
Deplores the several weaknesses reducing the effectiveness of the physical checks, and the failures in the transmission data system as a whole in the Member States, as well as the lack of a European control culture in the fish sector;
pozdravlja prizadevanje Komisije za izboljšanje razmer v zvezi s podatki o ulovih in prodaji ter časovno razporeditvijo poročanja z uporabo novih tehnologij; meni, da bo uredba v zvezi z elektronskim zapisovanjem in poročanjem povečala učinkovitost sistemov potrjevanja, na primer s takojšnjim elektronskim prenosom kopije potrdila o prodaji organom države zastave in države iztovarjanja, ki se nato lahko navzkrižno preveri z deklaracijo o iztovarjanju;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts to improve the situation with regard to the data on catches and on sales, and the timing of reporting, by using the new technologies; considers that the regulation concerning the electronic recording and reporting will increase the efficiency of validation systems, for example by providing for immediate electronic transmission of a copy of the sales note to the flag State and landing State authorities so that it can be cross checked with the landing declaration;
poziva Komisijo, naj poveča medsebojno pomoč in upravno sodelovanje med organi držav članic ter izmenjavo informacij med pristojnimi nacionalnimi uradniki z vzpostavitvijo takšnega sistema, kot že obstaja za DDV;
Invites the Commission to increase mutual assistance and administrative cooperation between Member States' authorities and the exchange of information between competent national officials by creating a system like that already in place for the VAT community system;
meni, da je za nadzor in celotno skupno ribiško politiko zelo pomemben sistem, ki bi omogočal spremljanje ulova od začetka do končnega potrošnika, kot že obstaja na enotnem trgu EU za vsa druga živila, ter poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi takšen sistem;
Considers it of great importance for control and for the whole CFP to have a system which allows the follow-up of catches from origin to final consumer, as already exists in the internal market with respect to all other food products, and urges the Commission to put in place such a system;
poudarja, da je treba ribiške kvote upoštevati in podpirati; meni, da mora Komisija v primeru kakršnega koli suma kršitve ali goljufije glede sistema kvot sprejeti odločne in nepopustljive ukrepe;
Stresses that the fishing quotas set must be respected and upheld; considers that the Commission must take strong, resolute action in the event of any suspicion of breaches of, or fraud against, the quota system;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj povečajo pristojnosti Agencije Skupnosti za nadzor ribištva in spodbujajo, da bo imela pomembno izvršilno vlogo pri nadzoru in usklajevanju skupne ribiške politike, izboljšanju preglednosti in usklajenosti ter da bo v okviru načrtov skupne uporabe usklajevala uvedbo skupnih postopkov;
Invites the Commission and the Member States to increase the competences of the Community Fisheries Control Agency and to promote the Agency's important executive role in the control and harmonisation of the CFP and in improving transparency and coordination by the establishment of common practices under the scope of the joint deployment plans;
poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga povečanje pristojnosti nadzornikov Komisije, ki morajo imeti večja pooblastila, da lahko za skupno ribiško politiko vzpostavijo skupno evropsko strategijo nadzora, države članice pa naj ta predlog sprejmejo;
Invites the Commission to propose and the Member States to accept the increasing of the competences of the Commission's controllers, who should have greater powers in order to create a common European control strategy in the CFP;
v zvezi s tem meni, da mora biti razmerje med stroški in koristmi, ki obstaja med sredstvi, namenjenimi nadzornim dejavnostim v skupni ribiški politiki, in rezultati teh nadzornih dejavnosti (sorazmernost in stroškovna učinkovitost nadzora), ključni element, ki ga mora Komisija upoštevati pri svojih prihodnjih predlogih glede skupne ribiške politike;
Considers, in this context, that the cost-benefit ratio existing between the resources dedicated to control activities in the CFP and the results obtained by these controls (the proportionality and cost-effectiveness of controls) should be a key element to be taken into consideration by the Commission in its future proposals concerning the CFP;