natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Sveta Evrope o pranju, odkrivanju, zasegu in zaplembi premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivim dejanjem, ter o financiranju terorizma (CETS št. 198),
– having regard to the Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (CETS No 198),
– ob upoštevanju študije „Ocena učinkovitosti praks držav članic EU pri identifikaciji, sledenju, zamrznitvi in zaplembi premoženja, pridobljenega s kaznivim dejanjem“ (2009), ki jo je naročila Komisija,
– having regard to the study ‘Assessing the effectiveness of EU Member States’ practices in the identification, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets’ (2009), commissioned by the Commission,
– ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom „Vloga EU v boju proti mednarodnemu organiziranemu kriminalu“
– having regard to the European Parliament study entitled ‘The EU role in fighting transnational organised crime’
EP 410.678. ,
PE 410.678. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročil o evropski oceni ogroženosti zaradi organiziranega kriminala (OCTA), ki jih letno pripravlja Europol
– having regard to the OCTA (European Organised Crime Threat Assessment) reports drawn up each year by Europol
http://www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp?page=publications&language= , še zlasti poročila iz leta 2011,
http://www.europol.europa.eu/index.asp?page=publications&language= , in particular that of 2011,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega poročila Europola, Eurojusta in Frontexa o stanju notranje varnosti v EU (2010),
– having regard to the Joint Report by Europol, Eurojust and Frontex on the state of internal security in the EU (2010),
– ob upoštevanju letnih poročil Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami o stanju problema drog v Evropi,
– having regard to the annual reports of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction on the state of the drugs problem in Europe,
– ob upoštevanju letnih poročil italijanskega nacionalnega direktorata za boj proti mafiji ( Direzione Nazionale Antimafia ); ob upoštevanju poročil nemške zvezne kriminalistične policije ( Bundeskriminalamt , BKA) o prisotnosti mafijske organizacije 'ndrangheta v Nemčiji, zlasti najnovejšega izmed teh poročil, naslovljenega „Analiza dejavnosti klana San Luca v Nemčiji“,
– having regard to the annual reports of the Italian National Antimafia Directorate; having regard to the reports of the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA, German federal criminal investigation department) on the presence of the ’Ndrangheta in Germany, in particular the most recent of these reports entitled ‘Analysis of the activities of the San Luca clan in Germany’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila o oceni nevarnosti ruskega organiziranega kriminala (poročilo ROCTA), ki ga je pripravil Europol leta 2008,
– having regard to the ROCTA (Russian Organised Crime Threat Assessment) report, drawn up by Europol in 2008,
– ob upoštevanju splošnega poročila o dejavnostih Europola (2009),
– having regard to the General Report on Europol’s activities (2009),
– ob upoštevanju študije z naslovom „Izboljšanje usklajevanja med organi EU, pristojnimi na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja: evropskemu tožilcu naproti“, ki jo je naročil Evropski parlament,
– having regard to the EP-commissioned study entitled ‘Improving coordination between the EU bodies competent in the area of police and judicial cooperation: moving towards a European Prosecutor’,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2006/960/PNZ o poenostavitvi izmenjave informacij in obveščevalnih podatkov med organi kazenskega pregona držav članic Evropske unije,
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2006/960/JHA on simplifying the exchange of information and intelligence between law enforcement authorities of the Member States of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2009/426/PNZ z dne 16. decembra 2008 o okrepitvi Eurojusta in spremembi Okvirnega sklepa 2002/187/PNZ o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala
– having regard to Council Decision 2009/426/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime
UL L 138, 04.06.09, str.
OJ L 138, 4.6.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju letnih poročil Eurojusta (2002-2010)
– having regard to Eurojust’s annual activity reports (2002-2010)
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/976/PNZ z dne 16. decembra 2008 o Evropski pravosodni mreži
– having regard to Council Decision 2008/976/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the European Judicial Network
UL C 348, 24.12.08, str.
OJ C 348, 24.12.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Evropske komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o vlogi Eurojusta in Evropske pravosodne mreže v boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2007)0644 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the role of Eurojust and the European Judicial Network in the fight against organised crime and terrorism in the European Union ( COM(2007)0644 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2009/371/PNZ o ustanovitvi Evropskega policijskega urada (Europol)
– having regard to Council Decision 2009/371/JHA establishing the European Police Office (Europol)
UL L 121, 15.05.09, str.
OJ L 121, 15.05.09, p.
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/977/PNZ o varstvu osebnih podatkov, ki se obdelujejo v okviru policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters
UL L 350, 30.12.08, str.
OJ L 350, 30.12.08, p.
– ob upoštevanju konvencije z dne 29. maja 2000 o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije
– having regard to the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union
UL L 197, 12.07.00. in aktov Sveta z dne 16. oktobra 2001 o protokolu k tej konvenciji in z dne 18. decembra 1997 o Konvenciji o medsebojni pomoči in sodelovanju med carinskimi upravami (Neapelj II)
OJ L 197, 12.07.2000. and the Council Acts of 16 October 2001 establishing the protocol thereto and of 18 December 1997 concerning the Convention on mutual assistance and cooperation between customs administrations (Naples II)
UL L 24, 23.01.98. ,
OJ L 24, 23.01.1998. ,
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami ter poznejših aktov, ki ga spreminjajo
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States and subsequent amending acts
UL L 190, 18.07.02, str.
OJ L 190, 18.07.2002, p.
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Evropske komisije na podlagi člena 34 Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami ( KOM(2005)0063 in KOM(2006)0008 ),
– having regard to the Commission communications pursuant to Article 34 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States ( COM(2005)0063 and COM(2006)0008 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila o izvrševanju evropskega naloga za prijetje, ki ga je objavila Komisija 11. julija 2007, in obvestila generalnega sekretariata Sveta o odgovorih na vprašalnike, katerih namen je bil zbrati kvantitativne podatke o uporabi evropskega naloga za prijetje za leto 2007
– having regard to the report on the implementation of the European arrest warrant published by the Commission on 11 July 2007 and the information note from the General Secretariat of the Council concerning the ‘Replies to questionnaire on quantitative information on the practical operation of the European arrest warrant - Year 2007’
– ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu o oceni evropskega naloga za prijetje
– having regard to its recommendation to the Council on the evaluation of the European arrest warrant
UL C 291E, 30.10.06, str.
OJ C 291E, 30.10.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/465/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnih preiskovalnih enotah
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/465/GAI of 13 June 2002 on joint investigation teams
UL L 162, 20.06.02. in poročila Komisije o pravnem prenosu Okvirnega sklepa Sveta z dne 13. junija 2002 o skupnih preiskovalnih enotah ( KOM(2004)0858 ),
OJ L 162, 20.06.2002 , and the report from the Commission on national measures taken to comply with the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on Joint Investigation Teams ( COM(2004)0858 ),
– ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta iz leta 2009 o uporabi evropskega naloga za prijetje in skupnih preiskovalnih enot na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU
– having regard to the 2009 European Parliament study entitled ‘Implementation of the European Arrest Warrant and joint investigation teams at EU and national level’
EP 410.671. ,
PE 410.671. ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2011/36/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 5. aprila 2011
– having regard to Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011
– ob upoštevanju štiridesetih priporočil Projektne skupine za finančno ukrepanje (FATF) za boj proti pranju denarja,
– having regard to the 40 recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to combat money laundering,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2005/60/ES o preprečevanju uporabe finančnega sistema za pranje denarja in financiranje terorizma
– having regard to Directive 2005/60/EC on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing
UL l 309, 25.11.05, str.
OJ L 309, 25.11.05, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1889/2005 o kontroli gotovine ob vstopu v Skupnost ali izstopu iz nje
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community
UL C 309, 25.11.05, str.
OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p.
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1781/2006 o podatkih o plačniku, ki spremljajo prenose denarnih sredstev
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1781/2006 on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds
– ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/568/PNZ o boju proti korupciji v zasebnem sektorju
– having regard to Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA on combating corruption in the private sector
UL L 192, 31.07.03, str.
OJ L 192, 31.07.2003, p.
54. in poročila Komisije Svetu na podlagi člena 9 Okvirnega sklepa 2003/568/PNZ ( KOM(2007)0328 ),
54. and the report from the Commission to the Council based on Article 9 of Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA ( COM(2007)0328 ),
– ob upoštevanju konvencije ZN proti korupciji („konvencija iz Meride“),
– having regard to the UN Convention against Corruption (known as the ‘Merida Convention’),
– ob upoštevanju konvencij Sveta Evrope o korupciji s kazenskega in civilnopravnega področja; ob upoštevanju Konvencije o boju proti korupciji uradnikov Evropskih skupnosti ali uradnikov držav članic Evropske unije in konvencije OVSE o boju proti podkupovanju tujih uradnikov v mednarodnem poslovanju,
– having regard to the Council of Europe’s Criminal Law and Civil Law Conventions on Corruption; having regard to the Convention on the fight against corruption involving officials of the European Communities or officials of Member States of the European Union and the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004
– having regard to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004
– ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom „Finančne institucije in izvajanje strukturnih skladov v južni Italiji“ (2009),
– having regard to the European Parliament study entitled ‘Financial institutions and Structural Funds implementation in southern Italy’ (2009),
– ob upoštevanju strategije EU na področju drog (2005–2012) in akcijskega načrta EU na področju drog (2009–2012),
– having regard to the EU Drugs Strategy (2005-2012) and the EU Action Plan on Drugs (2009-2012),
– ob upoštevanju svetovnega poročila o drogah iz leta 2010, ki ga je pripravil Urad Združenih narodov za droge in kriminal (UNODC),
– having regard to the World Drug Report 2010 of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC),
– ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropskega centra za spremljanje drog in zasvojenosti z drogami za leto 2010 o stanju problema drog v Evropi,
– having regard to the 2010 annual report of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction on the state of the drugs problem in Europe,
– ob upoštevanju študije, ki jo je po naročilu Komisije opravil Center za preučevanje demokracije ( Center for the Study of Democracy ) z naslovom „Preučitev povezav med organiziranim kriminalom in korupcijo“ (2010),
– having regard to the study by the Centre for the Study of Democracy ordered by the Commission, entitled ‘Examining the Links between Organised Crime and Corruption’ (2010),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 338/97 o varstvu prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst z zakonsko ureditvijo trgovine z njimi ter priporočila Komisije z dne 13. junija 2007
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein and the Commission recommendation of 13 June 2007
– ob upoštevanju študije o oderuškem izsiljevanju in potrebi po instrumentu za boj proti dejavnostim organiziranega kriminala, ki jo je leta 2008 izvedel raziskovalni center Transcrime, financirala pa jo je Komisija,
– having regard to the ‘Study on extortion racketeering: the need for an instrument to combat activities of organised crime’, carried out by Transcrime in 2008 and financed by the Commission,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Sveta z dne 25. septembra 2008 o celovitem evropskem načrtu za preprečevanje ponarejanja in piratstva ter resolucije Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2009 o okrepljeni strategiji za carinsko sodelovanje,
– having regard to the Council resolution of 25 September 2008 on a comprehensive European anti-counterfeiting and anti-piracy plan and the Council resolution of 23 October 2009 on a reinforced strategy for customs cooperation,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/99/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 19. novembra 2008 o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja
– having regard to Directive 2008/99/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on the protection of the environment through criminal law
UL L 328, 06.12.08, str.
OJ L 328, 06.12.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju pisne izjave Evropskega parlamenta 2/2010 o prizadevanjih Unije za boj proti korupciji,
– having regard to Written Declaration 2/2010 of the European Parliament on the Union’s efforts in combating corruption,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 20. novembra 2008 – Premoženjske koristi, pridobljene z organiziranim kriminalom: Zagotovitev, da „se kriminal ne splača“ ( KOM(2008)0766 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 20 November 2008 – Proceeds of organised crime: ensuring that ‘crime does not pay’ ( COM(2008)0766 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za pravice žensk in enakost spolov ( A7-0333/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Women's Rights and Gender Equality ( A7-0333/2011 ),
A. ker si Evropska unija še posebej prizadeva za vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice brez notranjih meja, znotraj katerega poteka preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu (člen 3 PDEU), in za zagotavljanje visoke stopnje varnosti s pomočjo ukrepov za preprečevanje kriminala in boj proti njemu ter ukrepov za usklajevanje in sodelovanje med policijo, pravosodnimi organi ter ostalimi pristojnimi organi, pa tudi s pomočjo vzajemnega priznavanja sodnih odločb v kazenskih zadevah in, če je to potrebno, s približevanjem kazenske zakonodaje (člen 67 PDEU);
A. whereas it is one of the primary objectives of the European Union to create an area of freedom, security and justice without internal borders, in which crime is prevented and combated (Article 3 of the TFE), and to ensure a high level of security through measures to prevent and combat crime and measures for coordination and cooperation between police and judicial authorities and other competent authorities, as well as through the mutual recognition of judgements in criminal matters and, if necessary, through the approximation of criminal laws (Article 67 TFEU);
B. ker organizirani kriminal zahteva visoko socialno ceno, krši človekove pravice in omejuje pravno državo, odvzema in zapravlja vire (finančne, delovne itd.), izkrivlja enotni prosti trg, kontaminira podjetja in zakonito gospodarstvo, spodbuja korupcijo ter onesnažuje in uničuje okolje;
B. whereas organised crime has a substantial social cost, in that it violates human rights, undermines democratic principles, diverts and wastes financial, human and other resources, distorting the free internal market, contaminating businesses and legitimate economic activities, encouraging corruption and polluting and destroying the environment;
C. ker zaskrbljujoči sodni, preiskovalni in novinarski dokazi jasno kažejo, kako globoko je organizirani kriminal v nekaterih državah članicah prodrl in si utrdil položaj v političnem svetu, javni upravi in zakonitem gospodarstvu; ker je mogoče pričakovati, da se bo takšen prodor, ki dodatno povečuje moč organiziranega kriminala, razširil tudi na preostale dele Evropske unije;
C. whereas alarming evidence that has emerged from the courts and from investigations by police and journalists indicates that, in some Member States, organised crime has infiltrated, and become solidly entrenched in, political circles, the public sector and legitimate economic activities; whereas it is conceivable that similar inroads have also been made, thereby strengthening the position of organised crime, in the rest of the European Union;
D. ker si organizirani kriminal prizadeva za gospodarski dobiček in temelji na njegovem ustvarjanju, zaradi česar se morajo ukrepi za preprečevanje tovrstnih pojavov in boj proti njim osredotočiti na določitev, zamrznitev, zaseg in zaplembo premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s kaznivimi dejanji; ker se zdi, da obstoječi zakonodajni okvir na ravni Evropske unije ni ustrezna podlaga za resne ukrepe za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, in ker je treba sprejeti zakonodajo, ki bo, na primer, omogočila t.i. razširjeni zaseg in ukrepanje v zvezi s premoženjem, ki ga imajo v lastni slamnati možje; ker ponovna uporaba zaseženega premoženja v družbeno korist spodbuja pozitiven odnos do strategij za boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, saj se zaseg premoženja ne razume več zgolj kot sredstvo, s katerim se kriminalni združbi odvzamejo viri, ampak tudi kot dejavnik z dvojnim pozitivnim učinkom, saj na eni strani pomaga preprečevati organiziran kriminal, na drugi pa spodbudno deluje na gospodarski in socialni razvoj;
D. whereas the purpose and basis of organised crime is to make an economic profit and consequently if action to prevent and combat the problem is to be effective, it must focus on identifying, freezing, seizing and confiscating the proceeds of crime; whereas the legal framework which currently exists at EU level does not appear to be an adequate basis for serious action to tackle the problem and there is a need for legislation which would, for example, allow so-called ‘extended confiscation’ and action targeting assets registered in the name of front persons and organisations; whereas, moreover, the re-use of confiscated assets for social purposes fosters a positive attitude to strategies aimed at tackling organised crime, since confiscating an asset is no longer regarded solely as a means of depriving a criminal organisation of resources but is doubly constructive in that it both helps to prevent organised crime and has the effect of boosting economic and social development;
E. ker se dejavnosti hudodelskih združb osredotočajo na številna in vedno bolj široka področja, kot so na primer mednarodna trgovina s prepovedanimi drogami, trgovina z ljudmi in njihovo izkoriščanje, finančni kriminal, mednarodna trgovina z orožjem, ponarejanje proizvodov, kibernetska kriminaliteta, okoljski kriminal, prisvajanje javnega denarja, goljufije in izsiljevanje, in ker ima velika večina tovrstnih dejavnosti nadnacionalni in vseevropski značaj; ker pranje denarja zajema velik delež premoženjske koristi, pridobljene s temi kaznivimi dejanji;
E. whereas criminal organisations are concentrating their activities on a large number of ever-expanding fields including, for example, international drug trafficking, trafficking in and the exploitation of human beings, financial crime, international arms trafficking, counterfeiting, cybercrime, environmental crime, the diversion of public funds, fraud and extortion, most of which activities are trans-national and pan-European by nature; whereas a large proportion of the proceeds of these criminal activities is laundered;
F. ker so nezakonito priseljene ženske in deklice bolj ranljive za organizirani kriminal, na primer skozi prostitucijo in trgovino z ljudmi, kot ženske in deklice, ki so državljanke EU;
F. whereas illegal immigrant women and girls are more vulnerable to organised crime, for example through prostitution and trafficking, than women and girls who are EU nationals;
G. ker je, kljub pomanjkanju celovite raziskave na tem področju, obseg poslovanja hudodelskih združb mafijske narave, ki delujejo v Evropi, izjemno visok, kar še posebej velja za italijanske združbe, za katere je bilo v številnih študijah (vključno s študijo Inštituta za politične, ekonomske in družbene vede – Eurispes) in v skupnem poročilu, ki so ga leta 2010 objavile agencije Eurojust, Europol in Frontex, dokazano, da je njihove prihodke mogoče oceniti na približno 135 milijard EUR, kar znaša več kot seštevek bruto domačega proizvoda šestih držav članic EU; v tem okviru je posebej zgovoren primer ‘ndranghete, ki predstavlja najbolj zakoreninjeno mafijsko organizacijo v državah EU in na svetu, katere letni dobiček znaša najmanj okrog 44 milijard EUR;
G. whereas, although no comprehensive study exists, the mafia-style criminal organisations operating in Europe have an impressively large turnover, particularly in the case of Italian organised crime groups, which, as found by many studies (including the Eurispes study) and confirmed by the joint Eurojust, Europol and Frontex report in 2010, are conservatively estimated to have revenues of at least EUR 135 billion, a figure which is higher than the combined GDP of 6 EU Member States, the foremost example being the ’Ndrangheta, the most deeply entrenched mafia group in the EU countries and in the world, which has an estimated annual turnover of at least EUR 44 billion;
H. ker grožnje organiziranega kriminala v Evropski uniji presegajo njene meje, zaradi česar je treba pri boju proti tovrstnim grožnjam upoštevati potrebo po celovitem in mednarodnem pristopu ter vzpostaviti sodelovanje s tretjimi državami in mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot sta na primer Interpol in Urad ZN za droge in kriminal (UNDOC);
H. whereas the threat to the European Union from organised crime goes beyond the borders of the Union and must, therefore, be addressed with due regard to the need for a global and international approach requiring close cooperation with third countries and with international organisations such as, for example, Interpol and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC);