natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da tekoči proces liberalizacije trgov in privatizacije javnih služb ni obrodil vidnih sadov, kar zadeva cene, kakovost storitev ali zmanjšanje javne porabe; nasprotno ugotavlja, da potrošniške organizacije in organizacije uporabnikov javnih storitev poročajo o povišanju cen, znižanju kakovosti storitev in povečanju stroškov oskrbe; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je liberalizacija prispevala k zmanjšanju števila delovnih mest v prizadetih sektorjih in k ustvarjanju zasebnih monopolov, ki ogrožajo pravice delavcev, uporabnikov javnih storitev in potrošnikov;
Stresses that the ongoing process of liberalising markets and privatising public utilities has not brought any visible gains in terms of prices, service quality or a reduction in public expenditure; notes, on the contrary, that consumers' and public service users' associations have reported price increases, a drop in the level of service quality and increases in the costs of provision; notes, furthermore, that liberalisation has contributed to the destruction of jobs in the sectors affected and the creation of private monopolies that put the rights of workers, public service users and consumers at risk;
zato zavrača liberalizacijo javnega prevoza, energetskih in komunikacijskih sistemov in še posebej nedavne sporazume o liberalizaciji mednarodnih železnic za potniški promet in poštne storitve;
Rejects, therefore, the liberalisation of public transport, energy and communications systems and, in particular, the recent agreements on liberalisation of international passenger rail particular traffic and postal services;
poudarja pomen javnih storitev za spodbujanje družbene, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije v EU; poudarja, da javni strukturni sektorji ne bi smeli biti izpostavljeni konkurenci, temveč bi morali biti v lasti in upravljanju javnih organov, saj je to edini način za zagotavljanje kakovosti, razpoložljivosti in dostopnosti storitve ter s tem pravic uporabnikov;
Highlights the importance of public services for the promotion of social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU; stresses that public structural sectors should not be open to competition but, rather, should be owned and managed by public authorities, as the only way to ensure the quality, availability and affordability of the service provided and so guarantee the users' rights;
poudarja, da evropska strategija zaposlovanja ponuja orodja za deregulacijo trgov dela, prehod s stalnih na negotove oblike zaposlitve ter zmanjševanje pravic delavcev in pravice do kolektivnih pogajanj, saj spodbuja zaposljivost in prilagodljivost delavcev;
Stresses that the European Employment Strategy has provided the tools for the deregulation of labour markets, the transition from stable to insecure jobs and the weakening of workers' rights and collective bargaining as it promotes the employability and adaptability of workers;
meni, da nedavne sodbe Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v zadevah Vaxholm-Laval in Viking Line kažejo, kam vodi usmeritev sedanjih pogodb v okviru lizbonske pogodbe; močno obžaluje, da je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v EU dalo prednost pravilom konkurence pred vsem ostalim ter s tem upravičilo socialni damping ter spodkopalo delavske pravice;
Considers that the recent rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the Vaxholm-Laval and Viking Line cases show where the orientation of the current Treaties, which remains in the Treaty of Lisbon, leads to; deeply regrets the way the ECJ has prioritised competition rules in the EU above all else, legitimating social dumping and undermining workers' rights;
odločno zavrača novi koncept prožne varnosti in poskus, da bi to postal vsesplošni pristop v času naslednjega triletnega cikla evropske strategije zaposlovanja ter integriranih smernic za rast in delovna mesta;
Strongly rejects the new concept of 'flexicurity' and the attempt to make it the overarching approach for the next three-year cycle of the European Employment Strategy and the Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs;
meni, da takšen koncept spodbuja liberalizacijo odpuščanja, prilagajanje dela (in plač) gospodarskemu ciklu, pri čemer javne službe za zaposlovanje držav članic prevzemajo stroške recikliranja in rotacije pri delu ter deregulacijo delovnih pogodb, kar ogroža družbeno kohezijo in kakovost dela; opozarja, da je za to strategijo tudi namera, da se pregledajo sheme dajatev za brezposelnost s ciljem zmanjševanja nadomestil za brezposelnost in trajanja upravičenosti do njih;
Considers that this concept promotes the liberalisation of firing, the adjustment of labour (and wages) to the business cycle with the public employment services of the Member States assuming the costs of labour recycling and rotation, and the deregulation of work contracts, jeopardising social cohesion and the quality of work; warns that behind this strategy there also lies the purpose of reviewing unemployment benefit schemes with the aim of reducing benefits and their duration;
opozarja na še vedno visok delež osipa mladih v šolah, še posebej v nekaterih državah članicah;
Draws attention to the still high rate of early school leavers, particularly in some Member States;
meni, da je potrebno, če naj bi imela EU najbolj konkurenčno in dinamično ter na znanju temelječe gospodarstvo na svetu, prekiniti sedanjo politiko izobraževanja in usposabljanja, ki vlaganja v raziskave in razvoj ter izobraževanje podreja muham prostega trga in s tem upravičuje trgovanje z znanjem, izobraževanjem in raziskavami (bolonjski proces);
Considers that in order to make the EU 'the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world' a break is needed with the current education and training policies tying investment in research and development and education to the whims of the free market and thus justifying the commodification of knowledge, education and research (the Bologna process);
meni, da sta monetarna in davčna politika v EU omejevalni, z glavnim ciljem cenovne stabilnosti in konsolidacije proračuna v skladu s paktom stabilnosti in rasti; poudarja, da so proces nominalnega bližanja euru in njegove posledice neugodno vplivali na gospodarsko rast in rast zaposlovanja, družbeno in gospodarsko kohezijo, dejansko približevanje med državami članicami ter na javne naložbe, kar je ogrozilo sedanje šibko gospodarsko okrevanje in boj proti nezaposlenosti;
Considers that monetary and fiscal policy in the EU has been restrictive, with its overarching objectives of price stability and budget consolidation in line with the Stability and Growth Pact; stresses that the process of nominal convergence towards the euro and what followed has had a negative impact on economic and employment growth, on social and economic cohesion, on real convergence between the Member States, and on public investment, putting at risk the current meagre economic recovery and the fight against unemployment;
opozarja na nedaven zlom finančnih trgov, kar močno in vse bolj škoduje ne samo Združenim državam Amerike, temveč tudi EU in drugim gospodarstvom; poudarja povečano tveganje finančne krize zaradi deregulacije kapitalskih trgov in večje nestanovitnosti na teh trgih po vsem svetu, hkrati s povečanjem „igralniških” poslov, ki trajno ogrožajo resnično gospodarstvo; zavrača deregulacijo, predvideno v akcijskem načrtu za finančne storitve, ki je vključen v lizbonsko strategijo;
Draws attention to the recent rupture of financial markets, affecting deeply and more and more not only the US but the EU and other economies; stresses the increased risks of financial crisis due to the deregulation of capital markets and their increased volatility worldwide, with an increase in 'casino' economies that pose a permanent danger to the real economy; rejects the deregulation envisioned in the action plan for financial services included in the Lisbon Strategy;
opozarja na posledice monetarnih usmeritev Evropske centralne banke in njeno vztrajanje na stabilnosti cen kot prednostni nalogi v času, ko sistem federalnih rezerv znižuje obrestne mere in ko na razmere opozarja celo Mednarodni denarni sklad;
Draws attention to the consequences of the monetary orientations of the European Central Bank and its insistence on giving priority to price stability, at a time when the Federal Reserve System is lowering the interest rates and even the International Monetary Fund is issuing warnings on the situation;
opozarja na program zunanje politike EU, ki ga zaznamuje vse bolj agresivna zunanjetrgovinska in naložbena politika ter neoliberalno preoblikovanje odnosov z manj razvitimi državami;
Draws attention to the EU's external agenda, which is characterised by an increasingly aggressive external trade and investment policy and by a neo-liberal reshaping of relations with less developed countries;
močno nasprotuje dejstvu, da EU spodbuja tako imenovane sporazume o gospodarskem partnerstvu s tretjimi državami, s čimer jim nalaga liberalizacijo njihovih javnih storitev in zmogljivosti ter zagotavlja odprtje trgov evropskim podjetjem, da bi na ta način zaobšla prekinitev pogovorov v Dohi;
Strongly opposes the EU's promotion of the so-called Economic Partnership Agreements with third countries, imposing the liberalisation of their public services and utilities and guaranteeing the opening of markets to European business, in order to overcome the stalling of the Doha talks;
obžaluje, da je EU sprejela proračun za leto 2008, ki je utemeljen na prednostnih nalogah iz neratificirane „evropske ustave“, sedaj vključenih v projekt „lizbonske pogodbe“ o konkurenci/konkurenčnosti, varnosti in oboroževanju, namesto da bi obravnavala družbene, gospodarske in okoljske izzive, s katerimi se sooča razširjena EU, in njene potrebe po povezovanju;
Regrets that the EU adopted a budget for 2008 based on the priorities stated in the non-ratified 'European Constitution' and now present in the 'Treaty of Lisbon' project, i.e. on competition/competitiveness, security and militarisation, instead of addressing the social, economic and environmental challenges facing the enlarged EU and its cohesion needs;
Čas za spremembo – nova strategija za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj
Time for change - a new ' Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development '
poziva Svet, naj se zavzame za resnično spremembo in se usmeri v zagotavljanje blaginje in življenjskega standarda državljanov, se bori proti revščini in razvija družbeno in gospodarsko kohezijo ter trajnostno uporabo virov;
Calls on the Council to commit itself to real change and to focus on securing the welfare and living standards of citizens, fighting poverty, and developing social and economic cohesion and the sustainable use of resources,
poudarja, da je za določitev nove poti za Evropo potrebna nova strategija: pot polne zaposlenosti, dostojnih služb s pravicami, boljših plač, družbene in gospodarske kohezije in socialnega varstva za vse, kar bo zagotovilo najvišji standard življenjskega blagostanja; pot, ki upošteva razvojne potrebe vsake države članice, še zlasti manj razvitih, ki spodbuja dejansko zbliževanje in ki prispeva k zmanjšanju razvojnih razlik med državami članicami ter obstoječih gospodarskih, socialnih in regijskih neskladij;
Stresses that a new strategy is needed to set a new path for Europe: a path of full employment, decent jobs with rights, better wages, social and economic cohesion and social protection for all, guaranteeing the highest living standards; a path that pays heed to the development needs of each Member State, in particular the less developed, that promotes real convergence, and that helps reduce the development gap between Member States and the existing economic, social and regional disparities;
zato poziva k nadomestitvi lizbonske strategije z „evropsko strategijo za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj“, ki bo temeljila na zgoraj omenjenih načelih in vsebovala nove gospodarske, socialne in okoljske ukrepe, da se bodo spodbujale naložbe v:
Calls, therefore, for the Lisbon Strategy to be replaced by a ' European Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development ' based on the abovementioned principles, with a new set of economic, social and environmental policies to encourage investment:
i) kakovost dela v vseh pogledih (plače, stabilnost, delovne razmere in usposabljanje) ter izboljšanje izobraževanja za nastanek zelo usposobljene in kvalificirane delovne sile,
(i) in the quality of work in all its aspects (wages, stability, working conditions and training) and improving qualifications, in order to achieve a highly trained and skilled workforce,
(x) promocijo kulture, športa in udeležbe javnosti,
(x) in the promotion of culture, sports and civil participation,
vztraja pri razveljavitvi pakta stabilnosti in rasti vzporedno z uvedbo pakta zaposlovanja in rasti, ki bo spodbujal javne naložbe, povečal njihovo učinkovitost in določil konkretna gospodarska, socialna in okoljska merila, prirejena specifičnim potrebam vsake države članice, zlasti pa se bo osredotočil na zmanjšanje brezposelnosti;
Insists on the revocation of the Stability and Growth Pact, in parallel with the establishment of an Employment and Growth Pact which will foster public investment, improve efficiency, and set specific economic, social and environment criteria tailor-made to the particular needs of each Member State, in particular targeting unemployment reduction;
poudarja, da je potrebno podpreti razvoj regij z omejenimi možnostmi, območij, ki se nenehno soočajo s strukturnimi ovirami, najbolj oddaljenih regij in območij, ki jih je prizadelo nedavno krčenje proizvodnih dejavnosti ali industrijsko prestrukturiranje, da bi v teh območjih in regijah okrepili ekonomsko in socialno kohezijo ter vključevanje žensk;
Stresses the need to support the development of the less-favoured regions, areas with permanent structural disadvantages, the outermost regions, and areas affected by recent deindustrialisation or industrial restructuring, in order to strengthen economic and social cohesion and women's social inclusion in those areas and regions;
poudarja pomen vloge, ki jo ima država pri spodbujanju gospodarskega razvoja, podpori donosnim vlaganjem, ustvarjanju delovnih mest s pravicami, spodbujanju izvoza in podpiranju mikro podjetij ter malih in srednje velikih podjetij, zadružnega sektorja in družin;
Stresses the importance of the state's role in the promotion of economic development, support for productive investment, creation of jobs with rights, stimulation of exports, and support to micro-businesses and SMEs, the cooperative sector and families;
vztraja, da je treba povečati vlogo države pri zakonskem urejanju trga, udeležbi in posredovanju na njem, ter oblikovati boljši regulativni okvir, zlasti na finančnih trgih;
Insists on the strengthening of the state's role in regulation, participation and intervention as regards the market and on a better regulatory framework, in particular for financial markets;
poziva k uvajanju davka na pretok kapitala znotraj Evropske unije zaradi vse večjih nihanj in nestanovitnosti finančnih trgov, nevarnosti špekulacij na področju realnega gospodarstva ter potrebe po novih virih davčnih prilivov, da bi vzpostavili večje davčno ravnovesje med delom in kapitalom;
Calls for the implementation within the EU of a tax on capital movements, in view of the increasing volatility and instability of the financial markets, the danger posed to the real economy by speculation, and the need to obtain new sources of tax revenue with a view to redressing the tax balance as between labour and capital;
opaža problem utaje davkov in zniževanja davčne osnove ter njunih posledic na izgube dobičkov in proračunske izgube na nacionalni ravni; poziva države članice, naj se trdno zavežejo, da bodo odpravile davčne raje in eksteritorialne dejavnosti znotraj EU do leta 2010 ter poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, da se resno zavzamejo za odpravo davčnih rajev in eksteritorialnih dejavnosti po vsem svetu;
Notes the problem of tax evasion and erosion and its impact on revenue and budget losses at national level; calls for a firm commitment from the Member States to abolishing tax havens and offshore activities within the EU by 2010, and asks the Council, the Commission and the Member States to make a firm commitment to abolishing tax havens and offshore activities worldwide;
opozarja na vse večjo odvisnost EU od zunanjih virov, kar je neposredna posledica nenehnega krčenja industrijske dejavnosti in politike selitev proizvodnih dejavnosti v tretje države;
Draws attention to the increasing external dependency of the EU, which is a direct consequence of the continuous deindustrialisation and relocation policy of productive activities to third countries;
poziva k novi politiki industrijskega vlaganja, ki izkorišča naravne vire in proizvodno zmogljivost vsake države članice;
Calls for a new policy of industrial investment that takes advantage of the natural resources and productive capacity of each Member State;
znova zahteva, da je treba ustvariti regulativni okvir na ravni EU, ki bo kaznoval selitve podjetij znotraj in zunaj EU; meni, da bi morala biti javna pomoč podjetjem na nacionalni ravni in na ravni EU odvisna od tega, ali so pripravljena prevzeti dolgoročne obveznosti glede regionalnega razvoja in zaposlovanja, in da pomoči ne bi smeli dodeljevati, če bi bila lahko uporabljena kot spodbuda za selitve podjetij;
Recalls its request for the creation of a regulatory framework at EU level to penalise relocations of firms inside and outside the EU; considers that public aid to enterprises at national and EU level should be linked to long-term commitments by them in terms of regional development and employment, and that no aid should be granted that could be used to promote relocations;
je seznanjen z namero o reviziji direktive o Evropskem svetu delavcev (94/45/ES); poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj ustrezno upoštevata resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 17. januarja 2007, v kateri je ugotovljena potreba po zaščiti pravic delavcev v procesih prestrukturiranja, ki so jim izpostavljena industrijska podjetja, potrebo po zagotavljanju polnega dostopa do informacij in možnosti odločnega poseganja v proces, vključno z volilno pravico in potrebo po opredelitvi meril za nadomestila, do katerih bi imeli delavci pravico, če podjetje ne bi izpolnjevalo svojih pogodbenih obveznosti;
Notes the intention to revise the European Works Council Directive (94/45/EC); calls on the Commission and Council to take due account of Parliament's resolution of 17 January 2007 stating the need to protect workers' rights in restructuring processes affecting industrial undertakings, the need to guarantee full access to information and the possibility of decisive intervention throughout the process, including the right to vote, and the need to define the criteria for the compensation that would be owed to workers should the undertaking fail to comply with its contractual obligations;
poudarja, da pregled evropske strategije zaposlovanja in integriranih smernic za naslednji cikel (2008–2010) ne sme temeljiti na konceptu prožne varnosti, ki ga je uvedla Komisija, temveč na spodbujanju služb s pravicami; poziva države članice, Komisijo in Svet, naj sprejmejo učinkovite ukrepe za upoštevanje socialnih standardov in zagotavljanje dostojnih služb, da bi s tem delavcem, še zlasti ženskam, zagotovili dostojne prihodke, pa tudi pravice do varnosti in zdravja pri delu, socialnega varstva in svobode sindikalnega delovanja, ter naj spodbujajo odpravo vseh oblik neenake obravnave moških in žensk pri delu ter hkrati sledijo ambicioznemu cilju zmanjšanja števila revnih delavcev v Evropi;
Emphasises that the review of the European Employment Strategy (EES) and the Integrated Guidelines for the next cycle (2008–2010) must be based not on the Commission's flexicurity concept, but, instead, on the promotion of jobs with rights; calls on the Member States, the Commission and the Council to take effective measures with a view to complying with social standards and guaranteeing decent jobs, thereby ensuring decent incomes for workers, and in particular women, as well as the rights to safety and health at work, social protection and trade union freedom, and to promote the abolition of all forms of discrimination between men and women at work, while also pursuing the ambitious objective of reducing the number of working poor in Europe;
poudarja, da so potrebni ukrepi za doseganje enakopravnosti moških in žensk (npr. enaka plača, starševski dopust, dostop do zaposlitve, ki vključuje pravice), in za ustvarjanje boljših razmer za uskladitev dela in zasebnega življenja, kar bo zagotavljalo ekonomsko neodvisnosti žensk; ugotavlja, da je potrebna nova in izboljšana izobraževalna in družbena infrastruktura tako za mlade kot za starejše, vključno s povečanjem in izboljšanjem možnosti za učenje, cenovno ugodnim otroškim varstvom, zdravstveno nego in nego starejših; opozarja države članice na obvezo , ki so jo sprejele na vrhu v Barceloni leta 2002;
Stresses that policies are needed to achieve equality for women and men (e.g. equal pay, parental leave, access to employment with rights) and to create better conditions for reconciling employment and private life, guaranteeing the economic independence of women; notes the need for enhanced educational and social infrastructures for young and elderly people alike, including increased (and better) facilities for learning, (affordable) childcare, nursing care and care for the elderly; reminds the Member States of the commitment they entered into at the Barcelona Summit in 2002;
poziva, naj se EU odločno zavzame za skrajšanje delovnega časa brez znižanja plač, da bo ustvarila nova delovna mesta in povečala storilnost; zato poziva Komisijo, naj umakne predlog za revizijo direktive o delovnem času; poziva države članice, naj do leta 2010 uskladijo prizadevanja za postopno skrajšanje delovnega časa, in poudarja, da je kratkoročni cilj 35-urni delovni teden; meni, da bi moralo biti skrajšanje delovnega časa brez znižanja plač samo po sebi cilj in merilo družbene blaginje;
Calls on the EU to make a strong commitment to working-time reduction, without lowering wages, in order to create jobs and increase productivity; calls, therefore, on the Commission to withdraw its proposal for the revision of the Working Time Directive; calls on the Member States to coordinate efforts to gradually reduce working time by 2010, and stresses the short-term objective of a 35-hour week; considers that the reduction of working time without lowering wages should be seen as an aim in itself and a measure of societal wellbeing;
poudarja pomen zviševanja splošne ravni izobrazbe in usposobljenosti prebivalstva; opozarja, da je kakovost javnih sistemov izobraževanja ključnega pomena za razvoj, in meni, da je treba sisteme izobraževanja in usposabljanja na različnih stopnjah v življenju okrepiti z nadaljnimi vlaganji in visokošolskim izobraževanjem, ki bo dostopno vsem;
Stresses the importance of increasing the overall level of education and qualifications of the population; recalls that quality public education is fundamental to development, and considers that education and training systems must be reinforced at various stages in life, with further investment and access to higher education facilitated to all;
vabi države članice, naj se osredotočijo najprej in predvsem na problem osipa v osnovnih in srednjih šolah; meni, da je stopnja osipa v šolah EU nesprejemljivo visoka; poziva spomladanski Evropski svet, da okrepi svoje prejšnje obveze za prepolovitev te številke do leta 2010;
Invites the Member States to focus first and foremost on the school dropout problem at primary and secondary level; considers that the EU school dropout rate is unacceptably high; calls on the Spring European Council to improve its previous commitments to reduce this rate by half by 2010;