natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(2.) ocenjuje se, da sta v Egiptu Hosni Mubarak in njegova družina med 50 in 70 milijard USD osebnega premoženja naložila predvsem v EU in ZDA
(2.) in Egypt, Hosni Mubarak and his family were estimated to have a personal fortune of between $50 billion and $70 billion predominantly invested in the EU and US
Poročilo IHS Global Insight. ;
IHS Global Insight Report ;
(3.) direktor London School of Economics je odstopil, ker se je razkrilo, da je bila ta šola vpletena v posel, vreden 2,2 milijona GBP, za usposabljanje libijskih javnih uslužbencev
(3.) the Director of the London School of Economics resigned over revelations that LSE has been involved in a deal worth £2.2 million to train Libyan civil servants
The Guardian, 4. marec 2011. ;
The Guardian, 4 March 2011 ;
Resolucija Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 1970 z dne 26. februarja 2011. ;
UNSC Resolution 1970, 26th February 2011, ;
(5.) ocenjuje se, da ima Gadafijev režim milijarde premoženja po vsej EU, zlasti v Združenem kraljestvu (zasebna lastnina)
(5.) it is estimated that the Kaddafi regime is estimated to hold billions in assets across the EU, especially in the UK (private property)
CNBC, 22. avgust 2011. ;
CNBC, 22 August 2011 ;
Kim Il Jong ima v evropskih bankah približno 4 milijarde USD
Kim Il Jong keeps approximately $4 billion in European banks
„Kim Jong-il keeps $4bn ‘emergency fund’ in European banks“, The Daily Telegraph , 14. marec 2010. ;
‘Kim Jong-il keeps $4bn ‘emergency fund’ in European banks’, The Daily Telegraph , 14 March 2010 ;
PREDLOG PRIPOROČILA B7‑0235/2011
PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B7‑0235/2011
o dosledni politiki do avtoritarnih režimov, proti katerim veljajo omejevalni ukrepi EU, ko ti režimi izvršujejo svoje osebne in gospodarske interese znotraj meja EU
on a consistent policy towards authoritarian regimes, against whom the EU applies restrictive measures, when they exercise their personal and commercial interests within EU borders
– ob upoštevanju veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in ustanovitve Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje,
– having regard to the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the setting up of the EEAS,
– ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 21 Lizbonske pogodbe in prejšnjih resolucij Evropskega parlamenta o varovanju skupnih vrednot, temeljnih interesov in celovitosti Unije v skladu z načeli Ustanovne listine Združenih narodov,
– having regard to Articles 6 and 21 of the Lisbon Treaty and previous EP resolutions on safeguarding common values, fundamental interests and the integrity of the Union in conformity with the principles of the United Nations Charter,
– ob upoštevanju smernic Sveta o izvrševanju in oceni omejevalnih ukrepov (sankcij) v okviru skupne zunanje in varnostne politike EU
– having regard to Council Guidelines on implementation and evaluation of restrictive measures (sanctions) in the framework of the EU CFSP
Evropski svet, Bruselj, 2. december 2005, 6749/05 PESC 159 FIN 80. ,
European Council, Brussels, 2 December 2005, 6749/05 PESC 159 FIN 80. ,
A. ker so nedavni prevrati na Bližnjem vzhodu izpostavili potrebo po doslednejši in učinkovitejši strategiji do avtoritarnih režimov, proti katerim že veljajo omejevalni ukrepi EU,
A. having regard to the recent upheavals in the Middle East which have demonstrated the need for a more coherent and effective strategy towards authoritarian regimes already targeted by EU restrictive measures,
B. ker je osebno bogastvo avtoritarnih voditeljev pogosto pridobljeno s korupcijo in izkoriščanjem njihovega ljudstva in virov,
B. considering that the personal wealth of authoritarian leaders is often gained through corruption and exploitation of their peoples and resources,
C. ker ugotavlja, da avtoritarni voditelji pogosto uporabijo to bogastvo za povečanje moči in zatiranje ljudstva,
C. noting that authoritarian leaders frequently use this wealth to bolster their power and oppress their peoples,
D. ker se zaveda, da bi učinkovito sredstvo proti avtoritarnim voditeljem bilo to, da se jih odvrne od izkoriščanja prednosti, ki jih prinaša korupcija, in da se prizadene njihova sposobnost prenašanja denarja,
D. being aware that an effective tool against authoritarian leaders would be to deter them from benefiting from the rewards of corruption and to attack their ability to move money,
(a) naj poglobi in okrepi izbor omejevalnih ukrepov zoper priznane avtoritarne režime, tudi z osredotočanjem na njihovo osebno in gospodarsko delovanje znotraj EU,
(a) to deepen and strengthen its array of restrictive measures against recognised authoritarian regimes by also targeting their personal and commercial actions within the EU
• naj avtoritarnim voditeljem in njihovim najpomembnejšim partnerjem odreče pravico do tega, da imajo v lasti nepremičnine ali denar v državah EU,
• to deny authoritarian leaders and their prime associates the right to own property or hold money in EU countries
• naj avtoritarnim voditeljem in njihovim najpomembnejšim partnerjem prepreči, da svoje družinske člane šolajo v državah EU,
• to prevent authoritarian leaders and their prime associates from educating their families in EU countries
• naj avtoritarnim voditeljem in njihovim najpomembnejšim partnerjem onemogoči, da potujejo znotraj EU,
• to prevent authoritarian leaders and their prime associates from travelling within the EU
• naj avtoritarnim voditeljem in njihovim najpomembnejšim partnerjem prepove, da upravljajo svoje poslovne interese znotraj EU;
• to prohibit authoritarian leaders and their prime associates from operating business interests within the EU;
(b) naj v ta pristop dejavno vključi tretje države;
(b) to actively involve third countries in sharing in this approach;
Pino Arlacchi, Bastiaan Belder, Frieda Brepoels, Elmar Brok, Tarja Cronberg, Arnaud Danjean, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Richard Howitt, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Vytautas Landsbergis, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Kristiina Ojuland, Alojz Peterle, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Werner Schulz, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Sir Graham Watson
Pino Arlacchi, Bastiaan Belder, Frieda Brepoels, Elmar Brok, Tarja Cronberg, Arnaud Danjean, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Richard Howitt, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Ioannis Kasoulides, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Wolfgang Kreissl-Dörfler, Vytautas Landsbergis, Ryszard Antoni Legutko, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Kristiina Ojuland, Alojz Peterle, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, György Schöpflin, Werner Schulz, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Inese Vaidere, Geoffrey Van Orden, Kristian Vigenin, Sir Graham Watson
s priporočili Komisiji o 14. direktivi na področju prava družb o čezmejnih prenosih sedežev družb
with recommendations to the Commission on a 14th company law directive on the cross-border transfer of company seats
Poročevalka: Evelyn Regner
Rapporteur: Evelyn Regner
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE: PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA K VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA 6
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED 7
MNENJE Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ..................................10
OPINION of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ..............12
– ob upoštevanju členov 50 in 54 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 50 and 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 21. maja 2003 z naslovom „Posodabljanje prava gospodarskih družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji – načrt za napredek“ ( COM(2003)0284 ),
– having regard to Commission communication of 21 May 2003 entitled ‘Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union – A Plan to Move Forward’ ( COM(2003)0284 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. marca 2010 z naslovom „Evropa 2020 – Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 3 March 2010 entitled ‘Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ ( COM(2010)2020 ),
– ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z dne 27. oktobra 2010 z naslovom „K aktu za enotni trg – Za visokokonkurenčno socialno tržno gospodarstvo – 50 predlogov za izboljšanje skupnega dela, poslovanja in izmenjav“ ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 27 October 2010 entitled ‘Towards a Single Market Act – For a highly competitive social market economy – 50 proposals for improving our work, business and exchanges with one another’ ( COM(2010)0608 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. aprila 2011 z naslovom „Akt za enotni trg – Dvanajst pobud za okrepitev rasti in zaupanja – Skupaj za novo rast“ ( COM(2011)0206 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication of 13 April 2011 entitled ‘Single Market Act – Twelve levers to boost growth and strengthen confidence – Working together to create new growth’ ( COM(2011)0206 ),
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta 2005/56/ES z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o čezmejnih združitvah kapitalskih družb
– having regard to Directive 2005/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on cross-border mergers of limited liability companies
– ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča v zadevah Daily Mail
– having regard to the rulings of the Court of Justice in Daily Mail
Zadeva 81/87 Daily Mail [1988], ECR 5483. , Centros
Case 81/87 Daily Mail [1988] ECR 5483. , Centros
Zadeva C‑212/97 Centros [1999], ECR I‑1459. , Überseering
Case C‑212/97 Centros [1999] ECR I‑1459. , Überseering
Zadeva C‑208/00 Überseering [2002], ECR I‑9919. , Inspire Art
Case C‑208/00 Überseering [2002] ECR I‑9919. , Inspire Art
Zadeva C‑167/01 Inspire Art [2003], ECR I‑10155. , SEVIC Systems
Case C‑167/01 Inspire Art [2003] ECR I‑10155. , SEVIC Systems
Zadeva C‑411/03 SEVIC Systems [2005], ECR I‑10805. , Cadbury Schweppes
Case C‑411/03 SEVIC Systems [2005] ECR I‑10805. , Cadbury Schweppes
Zadeva C‑196/04 Cadbury Schweppes [2006], ECR I‑7995. in Cartesio
Case C‑196/04 Cadbury Schweppes [2006] ECR I‑7995. and Cartesio
Zadeva C‑210/06 Cartesio [2008], ECR I-9641. ,
Case C‑210/06 Cartesio [2008] ECR I-9641. ,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. julija 2006 o nedavnem razvoju dogodkov in nadaljnjih možnostih v zvezi s pravom družb
– having regard to its resolution of 4 July 2006 on recent developments and prospects in relation to company law
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o evropski družbi v zasebni lasti in o štirinajsti direktivi na področju prava družb o prenosu sedeža družbe
– having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2007 on the European Private Company and the Fourteenth Company Law Directive on the transfer of the company seat
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2009 s priporočili Komisiji o čezmejnih prenosih sedežev družb
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2009 with recommendations to the Commission on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of a company
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. novembra 2010 o vidikih civilnega, gospodarskega, družinskega in mednarodnega zasebnega prava v Akcijskem načrtu za uresničevanje Stockholmskega programa
– having regard to its resolution of 23 November 2010 on civil law, commercial law, family law and private international law aspects of the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0426 . ,
Texts Adopted, P7_TA(2010)0426 . ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A7-0008/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A7-0008/2012 ),
A. ker je s členoma 49 in 54 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji zagotovljena pravica do ustanavljanja za vse družbe; ker je čezmejna selitev družb eden od ključnih elementov pri vzpostavitvi notranjega trga; ker zakonodaja glede prenosa in pogojev prenosa statutarnega ali dejanskega sedeža obstoječe družbe po nacionalnem pravu iz ene države članice v drugo na enotnem trgu ni dovolj poenotena, zato obstaja tveganje za zaposlovanje, kot tudi administrativne težave, povzročeni stroški, posledice na socialnem področju in pomanjkanje pravne varnosti;
A. whereas Articles 49 and 54 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union guarantee freedom of establishment for all companies and firms; whereas cross-border company migration is one of the crucial elements in the completion of the internal market; whereas the lack of consistency in legislation on transfers and on procedures for transferring the registered office or real head office of an existing company or firm incorporated under national law from one Member State to another, within the single market, and the associated risks in terms of employment, as well as the administrative difficulties, the costs generated, the social implications and the lack of legal certainty should be noted;
B. ker je bila večina sodelujočih pri javnem posvetovanju, ki se je zaključilo 15. aprila 2004, naklonjena sprejetju direktive o pravu družb o čezmejnih prenosih sedežev družb;
B. whereas the majority of the participants in the public consultation closed on 15 April 2004 were in favour of the adoption of a company law directive on the cross-border transfer of company seats;
C. ker sodba Sodišča v zadevi Cartesio potrjuje, da je zaradi neenakosti zahtev, ki jih države članice nalagajo za preselitve družb, potrebna usklajena ureditev za urejanje čezmejnih prenosov sedežev družb;
C. whereas given the disparities between the requirements imposed by Member States for companies' migration, the Court of Justice ruling in Cartesio confirms the need for a harmonised regime governing the cross-border transfer of company seats;
D. ker Sodišče v sodbi v zadevi Cartesio ni dalo ustreznih pojasnil v zvezi s prenosi sedežev družb, kakor je Komisija pričakovala v oceni učinka iz leta 2007
D. whereas the Court of Justice, in its judgment in Cartesio , has not provided the necessary clarification with regard to the transfer of a company's seat as expected by the Commission in its 2007 impact assessment
E. ker mora zakonodajalec in ne Sodišče na podlagi Pogodbe določiti ustrezna merila za uresničevanje svobode prenosa sedeža družb;
E. whereas it is for the legislators and not for the Court to establish on the basis of the Treaty the relevant measures to accomplish the freedom of a company to transfer its seat;
F. ker mobilnost družb še vedno omejujejo visoko upravno breme, pa tudi družbeni in davčni stroški, ki so rezultat izjave Komisije v oceni učinka iz leta 2007, da se možnost neukrepanja zdi najbolj sorazmerna, saj nadaljnje ukrepanje EU ni potrebno
F. whereas, as a result of the Commission's statement in its 2007 impact assessment that the "'no action' option seems more proportional as no further EU action is required"
Delovni dokument Komisije: Ocena učinka direktive o čezmejnih prenosih sedežev družb, SEC(2007)1707 , točka 6.2.4, str.
Commission staff working document: Impact assessment on the Directive on the cross-border transfer of registered office, SEC (2007) 1707, point 6.2.4, p.
G. ker ocena vpliva Komisije iz leta 2007 razen soodločanja delavcev ne vključuje posledic za socialne politike in politike zaposlovanja;
G. whereas the Commission’s 2007 impact assessment does not cover the implications for social and employment policies, apart from the involvement of employees;
H. ker bi bilo treba odvračati od zlorab družb, ki imajo le poštni nabiralnik, oziroma navideznih družb, ki se poskušajo izogniti izpolnjevanju zakonskih, socialnih in davčnih pogojev;
H. whereas the misuse of post-box offices and shell companies with a view to circumventing legal, social and fiscal conditions should be prevented;
I. ker bi moral biti čezmejni prenos sedeža družbe davčno nevtralen;
I. whereas the cross-border transfer of a company seat should be tax-neutral;
J. ker je treba pri prenosu sedeža družbe ohraniti pravno osebnost družbe, da bi zagotovili njeno ustrezno delovanje;
J. whereas transfers of seat should maintain the continuity of the legal personality of the company or firm concerned, in order to ensure its proper functioning;
K. ker prenos ne bi smel vplivati na pravice zainteresiranih strani (manjšinskih delničarjev, zaposlenih in upnikov), ki izvirajo iz časa pred prenosom;
K. whereas the transfer should not affect the rights of stakeholders (minority shareholders, employees and creditors) originating before the transfer;
L. ker bi morala postopek prenosa urejati stroga pravila glede preglednosti in informiranja delničarjev pred izvedbo prenosa;
L. whereas the transfer procedure should be governed by strict rules as regards transparency and information to stakeholders prior to the transfer being carried out;
M. ker so pravice zaposlenih do soodločanja pri prenosu sedeža družbe zelo pomembne;
M. whereas employees' involvement rights are of high importance when the seat of a company is being transferred;
N. ker bi bilo treba zagotoviti skladnost postopkov soodločanja zaposlenih med različnimi pravnimi določbami, ki jih vsebujejo direktive o pravu družb;
N. whereas coherence of the employee involvement procedures between the different legislative provisions contained in the company law directives should be ensured;
PRILOGA K PREDLOGU RESOLUCIJE: PODROBNA PRIPOROČILA K VSEBINI ZAHTEVANEGA PREDLOGA
ANNEX TO THE MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS AS TO THE CONTENT OF THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED
Priporočilo 1 (o področju uporabe predlagane direktive)
Recommendation 1 ( on the scope of the d irective to be adopted)
Direktiva bi se morala uporabljati za kapitalske družbe v skladu s točko 1 člena 2 Direktive 2005/56/ES.
The directive should apply to limited liability companies within the meaning of Article 2, point 1, of Directive 2005/56/EC.
Področje uporabe direktive naj bi ustrezno reševalo vprašanje ločevanja med registriranim sedežem in upravnim sedežem družbe.
Its scope should provide for an appropriate solution to the question of separation between the registered office and the administrative seat of a company.
Priporočilo 2 (o učinkih čezmejnega prenosa)
Recommendation 2 ( on the effects of a cross-border transfer )
Direktiva bi morala družbam dovoljevati uresničevanje njihove pravice do ustanavljanja s selitvijo v državo članico gostiteljico, ne da pri tem izgubijo status pravne osebe, temveč da se preoblikujejo v družbo, katere delovanje ureja pravo države članice gostiteljice, ter zanje ni potrebna likvidacija.
The directive should allow companies to exercise their right of establishment by migrating to a host Member State without losing their legal personality but by being converted into a company governed by the law of the host Member State without having to be wound up.
S prenosom ne sme priti do izogibanja pravnim, socialnim in davčnim pogojem.
The transfer should not circumvent legal, social and fiscal conditions.
Prenos bi moral začeti veljati na dan registracije v državi članici gostiteljici.
The transfer should take effect on the date of registration in the host Member State.
Od dneva registracije v državi članici gostiteljici bi morala za družbo veljati zakonodaja te države.
From the date of registration in the host Member State, the company should be governed by the legislation of that State.
Prenos ne bi smel vplivati na pravna razmerja, ki jih ima družba s tretjimi stranmi.
The transfer should not affect the company's legal relationships with third parties.
Prenos bi moral biti davčno nevtralen v skladu z določbami Direktive 90/434/EGS
The transfer should be tax-neutral in accordance with the provisions of Directive 90/434/EEC
Direktiva Sveta 90/434/EGS z dne 23. julija 1990 o skupnem sistemu obdavčitve za združitve, delitve, prenose sredstev in zamenjave kapitalskih deležev družb iz različnih držav članic (UL L 225, 20.8.1990, str.
Council Directive 90/434/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different Member States (OJ L 225, 20.8.1990, p.
Priporočilo 3 (o pravilih o preglednosti in informiranju pred odločitvijo o prenosu)
Recommendation 3 ( on transparency and information rules prior to the transfer decision )
Vodstvo ali uprava podjetja, ki načrtuje prenos, bi moralo biti dolžno pripraviti poročilo in načrt prenosa.
The management or board of a company planning a transfer should be required to draw up a report and a transfer plan.
Preden se uprava odloči o poročilu in načrtu prenosa, bi bilo treba o tem obvestiti zastopnike zaposlenih oziroma, če takšnih zastopnikov ni, neposredno zaposlene in se z njimi posvetovati o predlaganem prenosu v skladu s členom 4 Direktive 2002/14/ES
Before the management decides on the report and the transfer plan, the representatives of the employees or, if there are no representatives, the employees themselves, should be informed and consulted on the proposed transfer within the meaning of Article 4 of Directive 2002/14/EC
Direktiva 2002/14/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 11. marca 2002 o določitvi splošnega okvira za obveščanje in posvetovanje z delavci v Evropski skupnosti (UL L 80, 23.3.2002, str.
Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p.
Poročilo bi bilo treba predložiti delničarjem in zastopnikom zaposlenih oziroma, če takšnih zastopnikov ni, neposredno zaposlenim.
The report should be submitted to the shareholders and to the representatives of the employees or, if there are no representatives, to the employees themselves.
V poročilu bi morali biti opisani in utemeljeni gospodarski, pravni in družbeni vidiki prenosa ter pojasnjene njegove posledice za delničarje, upnike in zaposlene, ki lahko pregledajo poročilo v določenem obdobju, in sicer najmanj en mesec in največ tri mesece pred datumom skupščine delničarjev, ki odobri prenos.
The report should describe and justify the economic, legal and social aspects of the transfer and explain its consequences for the shareholders, creditors and employees who may examine the report during a specified period which may be not less than one month or more than three months prior to the date of the meeting of shareholders approving the transfer.
Načrt prenosa bi moral vključevati:
The transfer plan should include:
(a) pravni status, ime in registrirani sedež družbe v matični državi članici;
(a) the legal form, name and registered office of the company in the home Member State;
(b) pravni status, ime in registrirani sedež družbe v državi članici gostiteljici;
(b) the legal form, name and registered office of the company in the host Member State;
(d) predvideni časovni načrt prenosa;
(d) the timetable envisaged for the transfer;
(e) datum, od katerega se transakcije družbe, ki namerava prenesti svoj sedež, za računovodske namene obravnavajo, kot da ima družba sedež v državi članici gostiteljici;
(e) the date from which the transactions of the company intending to transfer its seat will be treated for accounting purposes as being located in the host Member State;
(f) podrobne informacije o prenosu glavne uprave ali glavnega kraja poslovanja;
(f) detailed information on the transfer of the central administration or principal place of business;