natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Končno je treba osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo in invalidne osebe obvestiti o vseh njihovih pravicah v obliki, ki je zanje dostopna in ustreza njihovim potrebam.
Finally, information to PRMs and to people with disabilities must be fully accessible and in formats corresponding to their needs.
3. poudarja pomen odpravljanja obstoječih vrzeli pri izvajanju in zagotavljanju spoštovanja Uredbe (ES) št. 261/2004 in Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2006 o pravicah letalskih potnikov v državah članicah, saj te vrzeli prispevajo k pravni negotovosti in ovirajo učinkovito varstvo potrošnikov;
Emphasises the importance of addressing existing gaps in Member States’ implementation and enforcement of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 on air passengers’ rights, which contribute to legal uncertainties and constitute obstacles to efficient protection of consumers;
na primer združena primera C 402/07 in C 432/07 Sturgeon ter tako jasneje določiti pravice letalskih potnikov in okrepiti izvršilne ukrepe;
for example joint cases C 402/07 and C 432/07 Sturgeon , after evaluation of the probable consequences and benefits for passengers, in order to clarify air passengers’ rights and strengthen enforcement measures;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, da se lahko letalski prevoznik v primeru zamude ali odpovedi enega leta v povezavi zaradi izrednih razmer na te izredne razmere sklicuje za prvi naslednji let v isti povezavi;
Calls on the Commission to clarify that in case one flight within a rotation is delayed or cancelled due to an extraordinary circumstance, the airline can also refer to that extraordinary circumstance for the first succeeding flight within that same rotation;
15. predlaga, naj se dodatno raziščejo možnosti in priložnosti za uvedbo enega samega zakonodajnega instrumenta, ki bi vključeval vse določbe in načela v zvezi s pravicami potrošnikov v civilnem zračnem prometu, da bi bila ureditev manj razdrobljena in da bi odpravili nedoslednosti na različnih področjih pravic potnikov;
Suggests that further research could be carried out to examine the opportunity and feasibility of establishing one single legislative instrument comprising all provisions and principles on consumer rights in civil aviation in order to reduce fragmentation and reconcile inconsistencies across the different areas of passenger rights;
19. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi smernice za razlago Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2006 o pravicah letalskih potnikov z omejeno mobilnostjo, zlasti njenih določb o varnosti in spremljevalnih osebah;
Calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines on the interpretation of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2006 concerning the rights of air passengers with reduced mobility, notably on the provisions on security and accompanying persons;
22. poudarja, da je treba posebej zaščititi ranljive skupine potrošnikov, zlasti invalidne osebe in osebe z omejeno mobilnostjo; poudarja, da je treba tem ranljivim skupinam zagotoviti dodatna jamstva, kadar uveljavljajo svoje pravice kot potniki, in poziva Komisijo, države članice in letalske prevoznike, naj zagotovijo spoštovanje teh pravic;
Emphasises the need to provide special protection for vulnerable consumer groups, especially disabled persons and persons with reduced mobility; points out that these vulnerable groups need additional guarantees when exercising their rights as passengers and calls on the Commission, the Member States and the air carries to enforce those rights;
24. poudarja, da je usposabljanje osebja letalskih prevoznikov in letališč ključno za učinkovito izvajanje vseh delov Uredbe (ES) št. 1107/2006 ter je stroškovno najučinkovitejša metoda za preprečevanje diskriminacije; zato poudarja, da je treba v sodelovanju s predstavniškimi organizacijami oseb z omejeno mobilnostjo zagotoviti ustrezno usposabljanje osebja na letališčih in letalih;
Highlights the fact that the training of air carrier and airport personnel plays a key role for guaranteeing the effective implementation of all parts of Regulation 1107/2006 and is the most cost-efficient means for ensuring non-discrimination; therefore stresses that adequate training of personnel at airports and on board the aircraft must be provided in close cooperation with representative organisations of persons with reduced mobility;
29. zahteva ustrezno usklajenost zakonodaje o pravicah letalskih potnikov s pričakovanimi ukrepi EU za kolektivno pravno sredstvo, da bi učinkovito zaščitili pravice potnikov in se zoperstavili tistim podjetjem, ki sistematično zanemarjajo te pravice;
Calls to ensure proper consistency between the legislation on air passengers’ rights and the expected EU measures on collective redress in order to guarantee passengers’ rights in an efficient way and challenge those companies that systematically ignore these rights;
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Christian Engström, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Małgorzata Handzlik, Sandra Kalniete, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Róża grofica von Thun und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud
Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Christian Engström, Vicente Miguel Garcés Ramón, Małgorzata Handzlik, Sandra Kalniete, Kurt Lechner, Hans-Peter Mayer, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud
Simon Busuttil, Ashley Fox, Marielle Gallo, Constance Le Grip, Morten Løkkegaard, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Olga Sehnalová, Marc Tarabella, Rafał Trzaskowski, Wim van de Camp, Anja Weisgerber
Simon Busuttil, Ashley Fox, Marielle Gallo, Constance Le Grip, Morten Løkkegaard, Antonyia Parvanova, Sylvana Rapti, Olga Sehnalová, Marc Tarabella, Rafał Trzaskowski, Wim van de Camp, Anja Weisgerber
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Philip Bradbourn, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Joseph Cuschieri, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Werner Kuhn, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Mike Nattrass, Hubert Pirker, David-Maria Sassoli, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Magdi Cristiano Allam, Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Philip Bradbourn, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Joseph Cuschieri, Christine De Veyrac, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Jaromír Kohlíček, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Werner Kuhn, Bogusław Liberadzki, Eva Lichtenberger, Gesine Meissner, Mike Nattrass, Hubert Pirker, David-Maria Sassoli, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Olga Sehnalová, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Laurence J.A.J. Stassen, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Giommaria Uggias, Thomas Ulmer, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada, Roberts Zīle
Spiros Danelis (Spyros Danellis), Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Nathalie Griesbeck, Ádám Kósa, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks
Spyros Danellis, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Nathalie Griesbeck, Ádám Kósa, Dominique Riquet, Alfreds Rubiks
o učinku dekoncentracije upravljanja zunanje pomoči s sedeža Komisije na njene delegacije na dostavo pomoči
on the impact of devolution of the Commission’s management of external assistance from its headquarters to its delegations on aid delivery
MNENJE Odbora za zunanje zadeve ...........................................................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ...................................................9
MNENJE Odbora za proračunski nadzor .............................................................11
OPINION of the Committee on Budgetary Control ........................................12
– ob upoštevanju deklaracije tisočletja Združenih narodov iz leta 2000 s posebnim poudarkom na osmem razvojnem cilju tisočletja,
– having regard to the 2000 UN Millennium Declaration, with particular reference to the eighth Millennium Development Goal,
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom „Ocena postopka dekoncentracije – končno poročilo“ ( SEC(2004)0561 ),
– having regard to the Commission staff working paper entitled ‘Evaluation of the Devolution Process: Final Report’ ( SEC(2004)0561 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Povečanje učinka razvojne politike EU: agenda za spremembe“ ( COM(2011)0637 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Increasing the impact of the EU Development Policy: an Agenda for Change’ ( COM(2011)0637 ),
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 30. junija 2005 o dekoncentraciji
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 30 June 2005 on devolution
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 28. junija 2011 o posebnem poročilu št. 1/2011 z naslovom „Ali se je z dekoncentracijo upravljanja zunanje pomoči s sedeža Komisije na njene delegacije izboljšala dostava pomoči?“
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 28 June 2011 on Special Report No 1/2011: Has the devolution of the Commission’s management of external assistance from its headquarters to its delegations led to improved aid delivery?
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta o skupnem stališču EU za četrti forum na visoki ravni o učinkovitosti pomoči (HLF-4, Busan, od 29. novembra do 1. decembra 2011),
– having regard to the Council conclusions on the EU Common Position for the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4, Busan, 29 November – 1 December 2011),
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 1/2011 z naslovom „Ali se je z dekoncentracijo upravljanja zunanje pomoči s sedeža Komisije na njene delegacije izboljšala dostava pomoči?“,
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors (ECA) Special Report No1/2011 entitled ‘Has the devolution of the Commission’s management of external assistance from its headquarters to its delegations led to improved aid delivery?’,
– ob upoštevanju odstavkov 122 in 123 evropskega soglasja za razvoj o napredku reform na področju upravljanja zunanje pomoči EU,
– having regard to paragraphs 122 and 123 of the European Consensus for Development, on the progress of reforms relating to the management of EU external aid,
– ob upoštevanju kodeksa ravnanja EU o dopolnjevanju in delitvi dela v okviru razvojne politike,
– having regard to the EU Code of Conduct on Complementarity and Division of Labour in Development Policies,
– ob upoštevanju pariške deklaracije o učinkovitosti pomoči iz leta 2005, agende za ukrepanje iz Akre iz leta 2008 in partnerstva za učinkovito razvojno sodelovanje iz Busana iz leta 2011,
– having regard to the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, the 2008 Accra Agenda for Action and the 2011 Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation ,
– ob upoštevanju medsebojnega strokovnega pregleda Evropske skupnosti v odboru za razvojno pomoč pri OECD (OECD-DAC) iz leta 2007,
– having regard to the 2007 OECD Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) European Community Peer Review,
– ob upoštevanju poročila odbora za razvojno pomoč pri OECD iz leta 2008 z naslovom „Učinkovito upravljanje pomoči: 12 ugotovitev iz medsebojnega pregleda odbora za razvojno pomoč“,
– having regard to the 2008 OECD/DAC report entitled ‘Effective Aid Management: Twelve lessons from DAC Peer Reviews’,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0056/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0056/2012 ),
A. ker se z decentraliziranim pristopom k dostavi pomoči odločanje bolj približa dejanskemu stanju in samemu kraju, kjer s praktičnega vidika pride do učinkovitejše koordinacije in usklajevanja donatorjev, pri čemer se dosledno upošteva potreba po lokalni odgovornosti;
A. whereas a decentralised approach to aid delivery brings decision-making closer to delivery realities and to where more operationally efficient donor coordination and harmonisation take place, while taking due account of the need for local ownership;
B. ker je končni cilj dekoncentracije in širše reforme zunanje pomoči, ki jo upravlja Komisija, pospešiti in izpopolniti postopke finančnega poslovodenja ter povečati kakovost pomoči v partnerskih državah;
B. whereas the ultimate objective of devolution and the wider reform of external assistance managed by the Commission is to enhance speed, thoroughness of financial management procedures and the quality of aid in partner countries;
C. ker je mogoče glede na poročilo Evropskega računskega sodišča na splošno sklepati, da se je z dekoncentracijo izboljšala in pospešila dostava pomoči, finančni postopki pa so se izpopolnili, vendar so še vedno možne precejšnje izboljšave;
C. whereas the ECA report's overall conclusion is that devolution has contributed to better aid delivery and that speed of aid delivery has improved, as has the thoroughness of financial procedures, but there is still considerable room for improvement;
D. ker je treba v treh letih do roka za uresničitev razvojnih ciljev tisočletja bistveno povečati zmogljivost EU za dostavo pomoči ter zmogljivost držav prejemnic za črpanje;
D. whereas with three years remaining until the MDG deadline, a substantial increase in EU capacity to deliver aid as well as in recipient countries’ take-up capacity will be required;
E. ker se 74 % zunanje pomoči EU iz proračuna EU in Evropskega razvojnega sklada neposredno upravlja prek 136 delegacij EU;
E. whereas 74% of EU external assistance from the EU budget and the European Development Fund (EDF) is managed directly through 136 EU delegations;
F. ker se v agendi za spremembe priznava, da je treba okrepiti usklajevanje med EU, državami članicami in partnerskimi državami ter koordinirati in uskladiti razvojne dejavnosti ter povečati njihovo učinkovitost in uspešnost;
F. whereas the Agenda for Change acknowledged the need to enhance coordination among the EU, Member States and partner countries, as well as to coordinate and harmonise development activities and increase their efficiency and effectiveness;
G. ker se z nedavno reorganizacijo znotraj Komisije in ustanovitvijo Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe splošna učinkovitost in skladnost razvojne pomoči še nista povečali tako, kot bi pričakovali;
G. whereas the recent reorganisation within the Commission and the creation of the EEAS following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty have not yet generated the expected increase in the overall efficiency and coherence of EU development assistance;
H. ker so bile delegacije z vzpostavitvijo Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje prisiljene, da sprejmejo dodatne pristojnosti, kot so diplomacija, informacijske/komunikacijske politike ter politike na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice, poleg obstoječih izzivov na področju koordinacije, skladnosti in pomanjkanja virov;
H. whereas, with the creation of the EEAS, delegations have been forced to take on additional competencies such as diplomacy, information/communication and freedom, security and justice policies, while still having to deal with the existing challenges of coordination, coherence and resource shortages;
I. ker pomoč, ki jo upravljajo posamezne delegacije, še naprej pokriva mnogo področij, kar dodatno bremeni vire na ravni delegacij;
I. whereas the aid managed by individual delegations continues to cover a wide range of areas, which puts further pressure on the resources located at delegation level;
J. ker lahko obremenjujoča ureditev in postopki ogrozijo uporabo državnih sistemov in skupno načrtovanje in ker bi bilo pri mednarodnem razvojnem sodelovanju primerno uporabiti večletne programe;
J. whereas cumbersome regulations and procedures can undermine the use of country systems and joint programming, and whereas the use of multiannual programming frameworks would be advisable in international development cooperation;
K. ker je splošna in proračunska podpora po sektorjih najprimernejša oblika pomoči za zmanjšanje stroškov transakcij za partnerske države, saj je bolj osredotočena na kakovost pomoči, naravo partnerstva in potrebe teh držav;
K. whereas general and sectoral budget support is the aid modality best suited to reducing transaction costs for partner countries, since it places the focus more firmly on the quality of the aid, the nature of partnerships, and the partner countries’ needs;
L. ker bi moral biti postopek dekoncentracije povezan z mehanizmom na ravni države članice, da se zagotovijo potrebne informacije o tem, kje nameravajo agencije porabiti svoja proračunska sredstva, s čimer bo pomoč bolje usmerjena ter bo mogoče ugotavljati primere pomanjkanja sredstev in možnosti financiranja v posameznih državah članicah;
L. whereas the process of devolution should be coupled with a mechanism at Member State level to provide all relevant information on where agencies are planning to spend their budgets, therefore making aid more targeted and allowing resource gaps and funding opportunities in individual countries to be identified;
M. ker bi morali glede na vse večjo podporo evropskih državljanov uradni razvojni pomoči kot načinu za izkoreninjenje revščine in dosego razvojnih ciljev tisočletja in glede na dejstva, ki lahko preženejo dvome o učinkovitosti pomoči, z reformo zunanje pomoči EU pokazati, kako ta izboljšuje življenja revnih;
M. whereas the reform of EU external aid should be used to showcase how the impact of aid is improving the lives of poor people, both in response to the European public’s growing support for official development aid as a means of eradicating poverty and achieving the MDGs and in light of the facts, which refute scepticism about the effectiveness of aid;
2. pozdravlja zelo izčrpno in analitično poročilo, ki ga je pripravilo Evropsko računsko sodišče, ter odlično izbiro časa za oceno rezultatov dekoncentracije;
Welcomes the very comprehensive and analytical report prepared by the European Court of Auditors, as well as the excellent timing of the assessment of the results of the devolution process;
7. meni, da pogoste kadrovske menjave v delegacijah niso sprejemljive (40 % osebja Komisije so pogodbeni uslužbenci), saj to slabi institucionalni spomin in negativno vpliva na učinkovitost delovanja;
Considers the high turnover rate of staff in delegations to be unacceptable (40% of Commission staff are contract agents), as this weakens the institutional memory and negatively affects the efficiency of operations;
12. poudarja, da bi morali razmisliti o najemanju lokalnih strokovnjakov, zaposleni v delegacijah EU pa bi si morali prizadevati za boljšo vključenost v lokalne družbe, da se premosti vrzel v znanju in omogoči dobro poznavanje lokalnega okolja, v katerem delegacije delujejo;
Points out that consideration should be given to using local expertise and that the existing staff of the EU delegations should strive towards greater involvement in the local societies, in order to bridge the knowledge gap and to ensure an accurate understanding of the local environment in which they operate;
14. meni, da so naloge in pristojnosti Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje na področju razvojnega sodelovanja še vedno nejasne, ter poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta potrebne ukrepe za rešitev tega stanja; v zvezi s tem z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bi lahko zaradi ločitve med političnimi in upravnimi nalogami Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje ter nalogami Komisije v zvezi z upravljanjem pomoči prišlo do nedoslednosti pri izvajanju načel pariške deklaracije;
Believes that both the mandate and the competences of the EEAS in development cooperation are still unclear, and calls on the Council and the Commission to take the necessary steps to resolve this situation; notes with concern, in this connection, that the separation between the EEAS’s political and administrative tasks and the Commission’s aid management tasks might be a source of possible inconsistencies in the implementation of the principles of the Paris Declaration;
16. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj se še naprej zavzemata za zmanjšanje števila področij posredovanja v skladu s kodeksom ravnanja EU o dopolnjevanju in delitvi dela v okviru razvojne politike ter agendo za spremembe;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to continue to advocate a reduction in the number of areas of intervention, in line with the EU Code of Conduct on Complementarity and Division of Labour and the Agenda for Change;
18. pričakuje, da bo Komisija sprejela vse potrebne ukrepe za odpravo pomanjkljivosti v nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemih, zlasti na ravni delegacij, kot je navedlo Sodišče; poziva Komisijo, naj najpozneje do konca leta 2012 obvesti pristojne odbore Parlamenta o ukrepih, ki jih je uvedla;
Expects the Commission to take all the necessary measures to overcome the weaknesses of the supervisory and control systems, notably at delegation level, as indicated by the Court; asks the Commission to inform Parliament’s competent committees by the end of 2012 at the latest as to the measures it has taken;
20. spodbuja Komisijo, naj zahteva, da delegacije sistematično opravljajo obiske za tehnično in finančno spremljanje projektov ter da sistem notranjega poročanja bolj osredotočijo na rezultate, dosežene z intervencijami pomoči;
Encourages the Commission to require the delegations systematically to carry out technical and financial monitoring visits to projects and to focus the internal reporting system more on the results achieved by the aid interventions;
23. meni, da Komisija ali države članice s sedanjo gospodarsko in finančno krizo ne bi smele upravičevati pristopa „narediti več z manj“, po katerem bi omejevale ali zmanjševale število zaposlenih v dvostranskih agencijah za pomoč;
Stresses that neither the Commission nor the Member States should use the current economic and financial crisis to justify a ‘doing more with less’ approach involving containing or reducing staffing levels in bilateral aid agencies;
Pripravljavec mnenja: Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas)
Rapporteur: Kyriakos Mavronikolas
UL C 101, 1.4.2011, str.
OJ C 101, 1.4.2011, p.
2. ugotavlja, da so glede na poročilo Računskega sodišča potrebna nadaljnja prizadevanja Komisije za izboljšanje načina ocenjevanja kakovosti in rezultatov njenih posredovanj; meni, da bo to pripomoglo k večji odgovornosti za finančna posredovanja EU in zagotovilo večjo prepoznavnost njenih ukrepov;
Notes that, according to the Court’s report, further efforts are necessary on the part of the Commission in order improve the manner in which it evaluates the quality and the results of its interventions; takes the view that this will result in better accountability for the EU’s financial interventions and will ensure increased visibility for its actions;
4. meni, da bi bilo zmanjšanje števila področij posredovanja na ravni države za vsako donatorico EU pomemben prispevek k zagotavljanju večje učinkovitosti in izdatnosti pomoči za vse zainteresirane strani, ter podpira prizadevanja Komisije, da bi dobila večjo vlogo pri vodenju procesa na ravni države in dosegla skupno načrtovanje z državami članicami EU;
Believes that the reduction of the number of sectors of intervention at country level for each EU donor would be an important contribution to making aid delivery more effective and more efficient for all stakeholders, and supports the Commission’s efforts to play a stronger role in leading the process at country level and to achieve joint programming with EU Member States;