natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja pomen čvrste zakonodaje o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in potrebo po njej; pri tem opozarja na resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2010 o evropski politiki kakovosti živilskih proizvodov ter meni, da je treba za uvožene proizvode obvezno upoštevati vsa merila o kakovosti in proizvodnji, da bi se preprečila nepoštena konkurenca z evropskimi proizvodi;
Affirms the importance of, and need for, robust regulations on the quality of agricultural products; recalls, in this connection, the European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2010 on agricultural product quality policy, and affirms the imperative need for imported products to comply with all quality and manufacturing standards so as to guard against unfair competition with European products;
opozarja, da stabilnost prihodkov opredeljuje zmožnost kmetov vlagati v zelene tehnologije, blažitev podnebnih sprememb, obnovljive vire energije ter okoljevarstvene ukrepe za trajnostno kmetijstvo; poleg tega morajo kmetje izpolnjevati visoke okoljske standarde;
Recalls that the stability of farmers' income determines their capacity to invest in green technologies, climate mitigation and renewable energy sources, and environmental protection measures for sustainable agriculture, and in addition that farmers are required to meet high environmental standards;
meni, da je bistveno izboljšati organizacijo verige preskrbe s hrano in jo še bolj racionalizirati, da bi zmanjšali okoljski vpliv prevoza hrane (prehrambeni kilometri) in spodbujali trženje lokalnih živil;
Considers it essential to improve the organisation of and further rationalise the food supply chain in order to reduce the environmental impact of food transportation (food miles) and promote the marketing of local foodstuffs;
poudarja, da bi naložbe v objekte za skladiščenje in pakiranje kmetijskih proizvodov lahko pomembno prispevale k zagotavljanju poštenih cen teh proizvodov;
Stresses that investment in facilities for the conservation and packaging of farm products could make a significant contribution to ensuring fair prices for these products;
poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti trajnostni razvoj podeželskega gospodarstva s spodbujanjem predelave kmetijskih proizvodov na kmetijah ter nekmetijskih dejavnosti, da bi povečali število delovnih mest in ustvarili dodaten vir dohodkov;
Stresses the need to ensure sustainable development of the rural economy by encouraging the processing of agricultural products on farms, as well as non-agricultural activities, with a view to increasing the number of jobs and generating additional revenue;
poziva Komisijo, naj podpre lokalne in regionalne pobude za prodajo živil in jih ne obremeni preveč s pravnimi predpisi in birokracijo, ker pomembno prispevajo k dodani vrednosti kmetijskih gospodarstev;
Calls on the Commission to support local and regional food marketing initiatives and not to burden them unduly with regulations and red tape, because they contribute significantly to the generation of added value by agricultural enterprises;
zahteva naj Komisija pri pregledu standardov EU posveti ustrezno pozornost proizvajalcem živil na lokalni ravni, kot je na primer samooskrbna ali delno samooskrbna proizvodnja;
Calls on the Commission to pay due attention, when reviewing EU standards, also to locally based food producers such as those involved in subsistence production;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni, ali je potrebno spremeniti predpise o praksi javnega naročanja za obrate za javno prehrano, da bi okrepili prakso trajnostne kmetovanja in dobrega počutja živali ter spodbujali uporabo sezonskih in lokalnih živil;
Calls on the Commission to assess possible modifications to the rules on public procurement practices for catering services so as to enhance sustainable farming practices and animal welfare and develop seasonal and local food;
meni, da bi morala javna naročila npr. v okviru posebnih programov za mlečne izdelke, sadje in zelenjavo, ki se izvajajo v šolah, zagotavljati dostop malim lokalnim proizvajalcem in skupinam lokalnih proizvajalcev;
Considers that public procurement, for example in the context of specific programmes for dairy products, fruit and vegetables being implemented in schools, should guarantee access for small local producers and local producer groups;
meni, da bi bilo treba sprejeti ukrepe za spodbujanje kmetijskih trgov, ki jih neposredno upravljajo kmetje, vzpostavitve prodajnih možnosti za proizvajalce, da bi svoje proizvode neposredno ponudili potrošnikom, in uvedbe programov za spodbujanje prodaje proizvodov na lokalnih trgih;
Considers that measures should be taken to encourage agricultural markets directly administered by farmers, the creation of marketing outlets for producers to offer their products directly to consumers and the introduction of programmes to encourage the sale of products on local markets;
poziva Komisijo, naj v poročilu Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta preuči ogromne izgube hrane v verigi preskrbe s hrano, ki v večini držav članic zajema več kot 30 % proizvedene hrane in naj ukrepa prek informativnih kampanj o temeljni vrednosti hrane;
Urges the Commission to analyse, in a report to the European Parliament and the Council, the huge waste of food in the food chain, which in most Member States comprises up to 30% of produced food, and to take action via an awareness-raising campaign about the essential value of food;
opozarja na pomen razvoja prehrambenih programov, namenjenih evropskim državljanom, ki jih potrebujejo – zlasti najbolj ogroženim in ostarelim osebam ter mladim;
Affirms the need to develop food programmes for those EU citizens who need them, such as the most disadvantaged, the elderly and young people;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. septembra 2010 o financiranju in delovanju Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji ( 2010/2072(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 7 September 2010 on the funding and functioning of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund ( 2010/2072(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji UL L 406, 30.12.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (ES) št. 546/2009 z dne 18. junija 2009 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji UL L 167, 29.6.2009, str.
having regard to Regulation (EC) No 546/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund OJ L 167, 29.6.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o predlogih sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uporabi sredstev Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v skladu s točko 28 Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju, ki so bile sprejete od 23. oktobra 2007 do danes Sprejeta besedila, 25.3.2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0071 in P7_TA(2010)0070 ), 9.3.2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0044 , P7_TA(2010)0043 in P7_TA(2010)0042 ), 16.12.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0107 ), 25.11.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0087 ), 20.10.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0049 ), 15.9.2009 (UL C 224 E, 19.8.2010, str.
having regard to its resolutions on the proposals for decisions of the European Parliament and of the Council on mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund, in accordance with Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management, that have been adopted since 23 October 2007 Texts adopted of 25.3.2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0071 and P7_TA(2010)0070 ), 9.3.2010 ( P7_TA(2010)0044 , P7_TA(2010)0043 and P7_TA(2010)0042 ), 16.12.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0107 ), 25.11.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0087 ), 20.10.2009 ( P7_TA(2009)0049 ), 15.09.2009 (OJ C 224 E, 19.8.2010, p.
46), 5.5.2009 (UL C 212 E, 5.8.2010, str.
46), 5.5.2009 (OJ C 212 E, 5.8.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 2. julija 2008 ( KOM(2008)0421 ) in 28. julija 2009 ( KOM(2009)0394 ) o dejavnostih Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji v letih 2007 in 2008,
having regard to the Commission communications of 2 July 2008 ( COM(2008)0421 ) and 28 July 2009 ( COM(2009)0394 ) to the European Parliament and the Council on European Global Adjustment Fund activities in 2007 and 2008,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun in mnenj Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A7-0236/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets and the opinions of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0236/2010 ),
ker je za omilitev negativnih posledic globalizacije za delavce, ki so bili žrtve kolektivnega odpuščanja, in za izkazovanje solidarnosti do teh delavcev, poleg povečevanja njihovega ponovnega zaposlovanja, Evropska unija ustvarila Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji (v nadaljevanju ESPG) za nudenje finančne podpore za individualizirane programe za ponovno vključevanje odpuščenih delavcev na trg dela; ker je skladu dodeljen najvišji letni znesek 500 milijonov EUR, ki se črpa iz katere koli razpoložljive razlike do skupne zgornje meje odhodkov iz prejšnjega leta oziroma iz zapadlih odobritev za prevzem obveznosti iz prejšnjih dveh let, razen tistih, povezanih z razdelkom 1b finančnega okvira; ker je bil ESPG osnovan kot prožen in poseben instrument za podporo, ki je bil namenjen bolj hitremu in učinkovitemu ponovnemu vključevanju delavcev, ki so bili odpuščeni zaradi sprememb svetovnih trgovinskih tokov,
whereas, with a view to countering the adverse impact of globalisation on workers affected by collective redundancies and to showing its solidarity towards such workers, besides increasing their re-employment, the European Union set up a European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (hereinafter ‘EGF’) to provide financial support for personalised programmes to reintegrate redundant workers into the labour market; whereas the EGF has a maximum annual amount of EUR 500 million, drawn either from any margin existing under the global expenditure ceiling of the previous year or from cancelled commitment appropriations for the two previous years, excluding those relating to Heading 1b of the Financial Framework; whereas the EGF was established as a flexible, specific support instrument that was meant to respond more quickly and effectively to the reintegration of workers affected by redundancies resulting from changes in world trade patterns,
ker je, kot odziv na povečanje brezposelnosti, ki izhaja iz gospodarske in finančne krize, in zaradi izkušenj, ki so bile pridobljene v letih 2007 in 2008, Evropska unija junija 2009 spremenila pravila za uporabo ESPG; ker se je ta sprememba nanašala na vse vloge, ki jih je treba vložiti pred 31. decembrom 2011, in je zadevala razširitev področja uporabe ESPG, večjo prožnost in natančnost meril za pomoč, povečanje stopnje sofinanciranja in podaljšanje obdobja, v katerem lahko države članice uporabijo finančni prispevek,
whereas, in response to the increase in unemployment resulting from the economic and financial crisis and to the lessons learned from the experience gained in 2007 and 2008, the European Union amended the rules governing the use of the EGF in June 2009; whereas that amendment concerned all applications to be submitted before 31 December 2011 and consisted in broadening the scope of the EGF, relaxing and clarifying the intervention criteria, raising the cofinancing rate and extending the period during which Member States may use the financial contributions provided,
ker ocena sredstev, ki so bila uporabljena v okviru ESPG med letom 2007 in koncem prve polovice leta 2009, kaže na nizko raven uporabe dodeljenih sredstev, saj je bilo uporabljenih samo 80 milijonov EUR od 1,5 milijarde EUR za 18 vlog ter v korist 24.431 delavcem in 8 državam članicam za zelo omejeno število sektorjev (zlasti tekstilna in avtomobilska industrija); ker pa se te pomanjkljivosti odražajo tudi v razlikah med ravnijo zneskov, ki so bili sprva dodeljeni, in zneski, ki so bili v resnici uporabljeni, saj je bilo kasneje vrnjenih 24,8 milijonov EUR (39,4 % uporabljenih sredstev) v okviru prvih 11 vlog,
whereas an analysis of the funds mobilised under the EGF between 2007 and the end of the first half of 2009 highlights modest implementation of the allocated resources, with only EUR 80 million having being mobilised, out of a total of EUR 1.5 billion available, for 18 applications submitted on behalf of 24 431 workers by eight Member States for a very limited number of sectors (notably textiles and the car industry); whereas those shortcomings are also reflected in the differences between the amounts initially allocated and those finally implemented, with EUR 24.8 million (39,4% of the appropriations mobilised) having subsequently been paid back in the case of the first 11 applications,
ker, četudi še ni mogoče oceniti delovanja ESPG v odnosu do revidirane uredbe, pa vloge, predložene od maja 2009, ki še vedno čakajo na sklep, ali se že izvajajo, že omogočajo ugotavljanje bistvenega povečanja števila vlog za pomoč iz ESPG, kar potrjuje primernost uvedenih sprememb; ker se je med majem 2009 in aprilom 2010 število predloženih vlog z 18 povečalo na 46, celotni znesek zahtevanih prispevkov z 80 na 197 milijonov EUR, število držav prosilk z 8 na 18, število delavcev, ki jim je treba pomagati, pa se je skoraj podvojilo (36.712 dodatnih delavcev), vloge pa so zadevale večji obseg gospodarskih sektorjev,
whereas, although EGF operations under the revised regulation cannot as yet be assessed owing to the fact that the applications submitted since May 2009 are still awaiting a decision or being acted on, there can already be said to have been a marked increase in the number of applications for EGF support, which confirms the pertinence of the changes made; whereas between May 2009 and April 2010 the number of applications submitted rose from 18 to 46, the total contributions requested from EUR 80 million to EUR 197 million and the number of Member States submitting applications from 8 to 18, while the number of workers requiring support almost doubled (36 712 more workers than before) and the applications concerned a much broader range of economic sectors,
vendar meni, da 9 držav članic še nikoli ni uporabilo ESPG, in da uporabljeni zneski sploh ne presegajo razpoložljivih maksimalnih letnih zneskov v višini 500 milijonov EUR in da večina vlog zadeva regije, v katerih je BDP na prebivalca večji od povprečja Evropske unije in katerih stopnja brezposelnosti je zmerna; in ker posledično lahko povzamemo, da četudi so bile izboljšave prvotne uredbe pomembne, pa so skromne glede na povečanje števila kolektivnih odpuščanj, ki je bilo zabeleženo v zadnjih letih,
whereas, however, 9 Member States have yet to make use of the EGF, the amounts mobilised remain well below the maximum annual amount of EUR 500 million available and most applications are for regions in which per capita GDP is above the EU average and where the unemployment rate is relatively low; whereas, in view of this, it may be concluded that, although the improvements made to the original regulation were substantial, they remain limited when set against the increase in the number of collective redundancies recorded over recent years,
ker naj bi bilo povečanje praga sofinanciranje s 50 na 65 % ob reviziji z junija 2009 eden izmed razlogov za povečanje števila vlog,
whereas the raising of the cofinancing rate from 50% to 65% during the 2009 revision would appear to be one of the factors behind the increase in the number of applications,
ker je majhna uporaba ESPG v najrevnejših regijah Evropske unije povezana z nacionalnimi strategijami, ki so različne glede na težave, povezane z nadaljevanjem oblikovanja kandidatur preden se sprejme sklep na evropski ravni,
whereas the limited use made of the EGF for the EU's poorest regions stems from varying national strategies and from the difficulties involved in establishing the precise status of potential beneficiaries before a decision is taken at European level,
ker je, kljub skupni izjavi Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije z dne 17. julija 2008, v kateri se zahteva čim hitrejša in čimbolj učinkovita finančna podpora ESPG, trajanje postopka od trenutka kolektivnega odpuščanja in datuma, ko ESPG podpre državo članico prosilko, še vedno med 12 in 17 mesecev; in ker to trajanje delno razloži razliko med številom delavcev, za katere se zahteva financiranje iz ESPG, in številom delavcev, ki iz sklada dejansko prejmejo pomoč,
whereas, although the Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 July 2008 called for EGF financial support to be provided as swiftly and effectively as possible, some 12 to 17 months still elapse between the time when a collective redundancy takes place and the time when EGF funding is provided to the requesting Member State; whereas this is one of the reasons for the disparity between the number of workers for whom EGF funding is requested and the number of workers who actually receive support under the fund,
ker osnutek medinstitucionalnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o sodelovanju v proračunskih zadevah KOM(2010)0073 z dne 3. marca 2010.
whereas the draft interinstitutional agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on cooperation in budgetary matters COM(2010)0073 of 3 March 2010.
samo obrobno spreminja postopek za uporabo sredstev ESPG s tem, da v skladu s prakso vrača postopek fakultativnega trialoga; ker ta sprememba ne rešuje zapletenosti in počasnosti postopka,
alters the procedure for mobilising the EGF only slightly, by making the trilogue procedure optional, in line with standard practice; whereas this change is unlikely to make the procedure any less slow and cumbersome,
ker je, v skladu z vmesnim poročilom o delovanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma Komisije KOM(2010)0185 z dne 27. aprila 2010.
whereas, according to the Commission's interim report on the functioning of the IIA COM(2010)0185 of 27 April 2010.
, eden izmed dejavnikov, ki upočasnjujejo postopek, potreba po specifični odločitvi obeh vej proračunskega organa za uporabo sredstev ESPG; ker to ne bi smelo preprečiti pospeševanja in poenostavitve sprejemanja sklepov glede uporabe sredstev ESPG,
, the need for the two arms of the budgetary authority to take a specific decision to mobilise the EGF is one of the factors behind the slowness of the procedure; whereas this should not prevent speeding up and simplification of decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF,
ker zanesljivi in skladni podatki o izvajanju ESPG, vse od spremembe po letu 2009, še niso na voljo, in ob strogem upoštevanju dejstva, da je treba določiti obveznosti na področju preglednosti in rednega poročanja,
whereas reliable and consistent data on the implementation of the EGF since its modification after 2009 is not yet available and taking the strong view that transparency and regular reporting duties need to be established,
ker je bilo vseh 27 odločb, ki so bile sprejete med letom 2007 in aprilom 2010, v svojem znesku pozitivnih in skladnih s predlogi Komisije,
whereas the 27 decisions taken between 2007 and April 2010 were all favourable and the amounts authorised were the same as those proposed by the Commission,
ker bodo pojav globalizacije in učinki gospodarske krize na zaposlovanje obstajali tudi po letu 2013, in ker je posledično mogoče, da se tendenca povečanja števila vlog v naslednjih letih lahko še okrepi, in ker sklad ne želi biti nadomestek za pomanjkanje inovacij,
whereas the globalisation phenomenon and the effects of the economic crisis on employment will persist beyond 2013 and, as a consequence, it is probable that the tendency for the number of applications to rise will increase in the next years; whereas, however, the intention of the fund is not to be a substitute for lack of innovation,
meni, da se dodana vrednost ESPG, kot instrumenta socialne politike Evropske unije, nahaja v vidni, specifični, usmerjeni in začasni naravi njegove finančne podpore za prilagojene programe prekvalifikacije in ponovno vključevanje delavcev, ki so bili žrtve kolektivnega odpuščanja v sektorjih ali regijah, ki doživljajo težko gospodarsko ali socialno motnjo;
Takes the view that the EGF's added value as an EU social policy instrument lies in the fact that it provides visible, specific, targeted and temporary financial support for personalised programmes for the reskilling and reintegration into employment of workers affected by collective redundancies in sectors or regions undergoing severe economic and social disruption;
meni, da povečanje števila vlog za posredovanje ESPG in težave pri izvajanju postopka za uporabo sredstev ESPG in za izvajanje zahtevajo hitre spremembe postopkovnih in proračunskih določb; poudarja, da mora Komisija izboljšati informacije o ESPG in njegovo vidnost v državah članicah in pri morebitnih upravičencih; zato nemudoma poziva Komisijo, da preloži predstavitev svoje vmesne ocene na 30. junij 2011 in da ji priloži predlog za revizijo uredbe ESPG, da se omilijo najbolj očitne pomanjkljivosti sklada še pred koncem veljavnega večletnega finančnega okvira;
Takes the view that the increase in the number of applications for EGF funding and the difficulties experienced in implementing the EGF mobilisation and deployment procedure call for improvements to be made to the fund's procedural and budgetary arrangements at the earliest opportunity; underlines that the Commission should improve information about, and the visibility of, the EGF among the Member States and the potential beneficiaries of the fund; calls, accordingly, on the Commission to bring the submission of its mid-term evaluation forward to 30 June 2011 and to submit at the same time a proposal for the revision of the EGF Regulation, in order to remedy the fund's clearest shortcomings before the end of the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF);
poziva Komisijo, da v svojem vmesnem pregledu oceni dodeljene prispevke, zlasti glede naslednjih kakovostnih vidikov:
Calls on the Commission to evaluate in its interim review the contributions granted with reference to the following qualitative aspects:
stopnja uspeha ponovnega vključevanja in ocena strokovnega izpopolnjevanja upravičencev;
the rate of success in reintegration and assessment of the upgrading of the skills of the beneficiaries;
komparativna analiza financiranih ukrepov kot odziv na vsako vlogo za uporabo sredstev iz ESPG in rezultati na osnovi ponovnega vključevanja;
a comparative analysis of the measures financed in response to each EGF application and results on the basis of reintegration;
spoštovanje merila nediskriminacije glede na pogodbene razmere odpuščenih delavcev in delavcev, ki uveljavljajo svojo pravico do prostega gibanja znotraj EU;
compliance with the non-discrimination criterion with reference to the contractual position of the workers made redundant and to workers who make use of their right to free movement within the EU;
postopki posvetovanja s socialnimi partnerji, ki so bili, oziroma niso bili uporabljeni pri pripravi vlog, in pregledi glede njihovega izvajanja;
the procedures for consulting the social partners that were or were not used when preparing applications and the checks carried out on their implementation;
vpliv ESPG na mrežo njegovih upravičencev in na mala in srednja podjetja, ki bi jih lahko prizadel načrt odpuščanja presežnih delavcev, in delavci katerih bi lahko koristili sklad;
the impact of the EGF on its beneficiaries' network and on the small and medium-sized enterprises potentially affected by the redundancy plan and whose employees could profit from the fund;
analiza posledic različnih kandidatur za ESPG pri nacionalnih institucijah, ki so pristojne za njihovo upravljanje;
an analysis of the implications of the different EGF candidatures in terms of the national institution in charge of their management;