natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropska platforma proti revščini in socialni izključenosti (KOM(2010) 758 konč. , revščina pa je nesprejemljiv odraz neenake porazdelitve bogastva, dohodka in sredstev v Evropi z uspešnim gospodarstvom; ker je finančna, gospodarska in socialna kriza najbolj prizadela najbolj ogroženo prebivalstvo – starejše in invalide; ker varčevalni ukrepi, ki jih Evropske unija je ali bo sprejela, ne smejo ogrožati zaposlovanja in socialne zaščite, slabšati položaja najbolj prikrajšanih ter izpostavljati brezposelnosti, pomanjkanju ali revščini milijonov ljudi, ki bi se sicer še vedno lahko preživljali ali si privoščili osnovne dobrine s svojim delom ali pokojnino, zlasti zaradi proračunskih rezov pri javnih storitvah in socialni pomoči; ker vse večje pogojevanje in zaostrovanje sankcij v politikah socialnega aktiviranja kot odgovor na krizo povečuje težave najbolj ogroženih v družbi, saj jim je na voljo le malo dostojnih delovnih mest; ker se prepad med revnimi in bogatimi v času krize še poglablja;
Commission communication entitled ‘European Platform against Poverty and Social Exclusion’, ( COM(2010)0758 ). ; whereas poverty is the unacceptable reflection of an uneven distribution of wealth, income and resources in a prosperous European economy; whereas the most vulnerable groups, such as the elderly and people with disabilities, have been those most severely affected by the financial, economic and social crisis; whereas the austerity measures currently being taken in the EU, and those to be taken in the future, must not undermine employment and social protection, worsen the situation for the most disadvantaged or put at risk of unemployment, economic insecurity or poverty millions of people who were previously still managing to live on, and meet their basic needs from, their wages or retirement pensions, notably as a result of cuts in public service and social assistance budgets; whereas the application of tougher conditions and penalties as part of social activation policies designed to address the crisis is exacerbating the difficulties faced by the most vulnerable people at a time when few decent jobs are on offer; whereas the gap between rich and poor is continuing to widen as a result of the crisis;
Kršitve temeljnih pravic
Violations of fundamental rights
B. ker je cilj nove strategije Komisije za izvajanje Listine o temeljnih pravicah zlasti spodbujanje dostopa najbolj ogroženega prebivalstva do temeljnih pravic; ker je treba to listino dosledno upoštevati, revščina pa pomeni kršitev človekovih pravic in hud poseg v človekovo dostojanstvo, kar spodbuja stigmatizacijo in krivice; ker mora biti glavni cilj sistemov dohodkovne podpore rešiti ljudi iz revščine in jim omogočiti dostojno življenje;
B. whereas the Commission’s new strategy for implementing the Charter of Fundamental Rights aims, inter alia, to improve access to fundamental rights for the most disadvantaged; whereas the Charter must be respected in its entirety, and whereas severe poverty represents a violation of human rights and a serious erosion of human dignity and encourages stigmatisation and injustice; whereas the key objective of income support schemes must be to lift people out of poverty and enable them to live in dignity;
Neizpolnjene zaveze
Commitments not honoured
C. ker sta se revščina in socialna izključenost v obdobju med letoma 2000 in 2008 povečali in prizadeli nove družbene kategorije, navzlic prizadevanjem Unije za izkoreninjenje revščine v EU do leta 2010, cilj, sprejet 23. in 24. marca 2000 na vrhu v Lizboni, ali ciljev glede načrtovanega napredka, sprejetih 7. in 9. decembra 2000 na vrhu Evropskega sveta v Nici; ker se revščine in izključenosti ne da zmanjšati brez preprečevanja in odprave neenakosti in diskriminacije ali brez zagotovljenega razvoja nacionalnih gospodarstev in solidarnosti z najšibkejšimi družbenimi skupinami, torej brez pravične in ustrezno porazdeljene blaginje v državi, brez tega pa tudi ni mogoče zagotoviti vključujoče rasti;
C. whereas poverty and social exclusion increased and involved new social categories between 2000 and 2008 despite the undertakings given by the Union in relation to the target, set at the Lisbon summit of 23 and 24 March 2000, of eradicating poverty in the EU by 2010, and the progress which the Nice European Council of 7 and 9 December 2000 agreed should be made; whereas it is impossible to reduce poverty and social exclusion, or to boost inclusive growth, if nothing is done to combat inequality and discrimination, or if countries’ economies do not develop and there is no solidarity with the weakest groups in society, that is, if national wealth is not shared fairly;
D. ker so ljudje na podeželju, zlasti majhna kmetijska gospodarstva in mladi kmeti, ki jim grozijo posledice gospodarske krize in preveliko nihanje cen surovin, neposredno izpostavljeni revščini;
D. whereas the risk of poverty directly affects rural communities and especially small farms and young farmers threatened by the effects of the economic crisis and by excessive fluctuations in commodity prices;
20 milijonov manj
20 million people
E. ker je eden od petih poglavitnih ciljev strategije Evropa 2020, vendar nezavezujoč cilj brez možnosti sankcij, za 20 milijonov zmanjšati število ljudi, ki jih ogroža revščina, glede na tri kazalnike, ki so jih določile države članice (stopnja tveganja revščine po socialnih transferjih, indeks hudega materialnega pomanjkanja in delež ljudi, ki živijo v gospodinjstvih z zelo nizko intenzivnostjo dela ali v gospodinjstvih brez delovno aktivnih članov); ker je glede na 116 milijonov ljudi, ki jih ogroža revščina, in 42 milijonov, ki živijo v hudem materialnem pomanjkanju, pri tem cilju sicer priznana pomembnost boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti, vendar od vsega začetka niso upoštevani milijoni ljudi v Evropi, ki jih ogrožajo učinki praga, tako da so najšibkejši izključeni iz politik, usmerjenih v kvantitativne rezultate; ker z izvajanimi ukrepi ne bomo mogli reševati najtežjih razmer, če jih ne bomo že takoj uporabili kot izhodišče; ker je evropska platforma proti revščini ena od sedmih vodilnih pobud strategije Evropa 2020;
E. whereas one of the five major objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy is the soft target – i.e. not coupled with sanctions – of reducing the number of people at risk of poverty by 20 million, on the basis of three indicators agreed upon by the Member States (the at-risk-of-poverty rate after social transfers, the severe material deprivation index and the percentage of people living in jobless households or households with very low work intensity); whereas, although this target acknowledges the importance of combating poverty and social exclusion, the figures of 116 million people at risk of poverty and 42 million living in conditions of severe material deprivation mean that, from the outset, it reflects the abandonment of millions of people in Europe, with the associated risk of generating threshold effects which exclude the most vulnerable people from the scope of policies geared to measurable results; whereas, if the most intractable situations are not addressed from the outset, the policies implemented will have no impact on them; whereas the European Platform against Poverty is one of the seven flagship initiatives of the Europe 2020 strategy;
F. ker so socialne razlike v nekaterih državah članicah vse večje, kar je predvsem posledica gospodarskih razlik v razporeditvi dohodkov in bogastva, razlik na trgu delovne sile, pomanjkanja socialne varnosti in neenakega dostopa do socialnih funkcij države (socialnega varstva, zdravstva, šolstva, sodstva itd.);
F. whereas social inequality is increasing in some Member States, in particular as a result of economic inequality in terms of income and wealth distribution, labour market inequalities, social insecurity and unequal access to the social functions of the state, such as welfare, health, education and the legal system;
Razmerje med gospodarstvom in revščino
Relationship between the economy and poverty
G. ker revščina, ki v državah članicah EU že vrsto let dosega visoko stopnjo, čedalje močneje vpliva na gospodarstvo, ovira rast, povečuje javnofinančni primanjkljaj in zmanjšuje evropsko konkurenčnost, kar pa tudi povzroča revščino in brezposelnost, zlasti dolgotrajno (vsaka tretja brezposelna oseba je dolgotrajno brezposelna), te razmere pa so še slabše v državah z najšibkejšim gospodarstvom; ker je za boj proti revščini bistveno ohranjanje socialnih pravic v Uniji;
G. whereas poverty – which has been running at a high level in the EU Member States for many years – is having a steadily increasing impact on the economy, is detrimental to growth, increases public budget deficits and undermines the EU’s competitiveness, and whereas these factors in themselves create poverty and unemployment, particularly long-term unemployment, which affects one-third of the jobless, and whereas this situation that is worse in the more economically vulnerable countries; whereas the preservation of social rights in the European Union is crucial to any attempt to address poverty;
H. ker revščina, ki jo je mogoče enačiti s kršitvijo človekovih pravic, kaže, koliko prizadevanj bo še treba vložiti v uresničevanje ciljev iz člena 3(3) Pogodbe o EU;
H. whereas poverty can be classed as a human rights violation and is thus proof of the effort still needed to achieve the aims set out in Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union;
I. ker mora biti restriktivna politika vedno pametna in mora omogočati proticiklično vlaganje v najpomembnejše politične prednostne naloge;
I. whereas any stringent budgetary policy needs to be intelligent, with scope for counter-cyclical investment in major policy priorities;
J. ker je za zagotovitev evropske konkurenčnosti, ustvarjanje delovnih mest in boj proti revščini bistveno sprejetje strukturnih reform;
J. whereas structural reforms must be adopted in order to keep Europe competitive, create jobs and fight poverty;
Revščina kot večplasten pojav
Multidimensional poverty
K. ker je revščina večplasten pojav, ki zahteva celovito ukrepanje, upoštevaje življenjska obdobja in raznovrstne potrebe ljudi, ter mora temeljiti tudi na zagotavljanju dostopa do pravic, virov in storitev, kot je izraženo v skupnih ciljih odprte metode koordinacije na področju socialne zaščite in socialnega vključevanja (2006), da bi pokrili osnovne potrebe in preprečili socialno izključenost;
K. whereas poverty is a multi-faceted problem requiring an integrated response which is tailored to different stages of life and to people’s multidimensional needs, and which is also based on guaranteeing access to rights, resources and services, as reflected in the common objectives of the Open Method of Coordination for social protection and social inclusion (2006), in order to meet basic needs and prevent social exclusion;
L. ker je bilo evropsko leto boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti (2010) uspešno pri ozaveščanju javnosti in doseganju politične zavezanosti;
L. whereas the 2010 European Year against Poverty and Social Exclusion was successful in raising public awareness and encouraging political commitment;
Dostojno delo in revni zaposleni
Decent work/the working poor
M. ker zgolj rast in zaposlitev, tudi kakovostna, ljudem še ne omogočata rešitve iz revščine, saj se je povečala segmentacija trga dela, ker so se delovne in življenjske razmere, zlasti med finančno krizo, zelo poslabšale, ker se močno povečuje negotovost dela, proti čemur se je treba boriti, ker se v zadnjih letih priznava pojav revnih zaposlenih, vendar se ta problem ne rešuje skladno s tem, kakšen izziv je to za našo družbo: 8 % aktivnega prebivalstva se namreč kljub zaposlenosti spopada z revščino, kar 22 % tistih, ki jim grozi revščina, pa je zaposlenih
M. whereas growth and employment – even in a decent job – alone are not sufficient to lift people out of poverty, and whereas the labour market has become increasingly fragmented, working and living conditions have deteriorated considerably, particularly in the wake of the financial crisis, and work has become much less secure – a trend which must be combated; whereas the problem of the working poor has gained increasing recognition in recent years, but does not yet appear to be being addressed to an extent commensurate with the challenges it represents for our societies; whereas the number of working poor has grown considerably in recent years, with 8% of the working population living in poverty and 22% of those at risk of poverty holding jobs
EUROSTAT (2009), poročilo OSZ z naslovom Ocena OSZ o socialni razsežnosti strategije Evropa 2020 (10. februar 2011). ; ker je dostop do dostojnih in enakih delovnih razmer korak naprej za zajezitev revščine ter socialne izključenosti družin in osamljenih oseb;
EUROSTAT (2009), ‘SPC Assessment of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 Strategy’, 10 February 2011. ; whereas the availability of decent, egalitarian working conditions is a step towards reducing poverty and social exclusion among families and people living alone;
N. ker so nizkokvalificirane ali nekvalificirane osebe bolj izpostavljene tveganjem na trgu dela, negotovi in slabo plačani zaposlitvi ter revščini;
N. whereas, nevertheless, people with few or no qualifications are more exposed to labour market hazards, insecure and poorly paid employment, and poverty;
O. ker je brezdomstvo ena od najhujših oblik revščine in problem, ki v vseh državah članicah EU ostaja nerešen; ker je v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije zaradi različnih razlogov veliko število brezdomcev, kar zahteva posebno ukrepanje za njihovo socialno vključevanje; ker po Evrobarometru skoraj vsak četrti Evropejec kot glavni razlog za revščino navaja predraga dostojna stanovanja, skoraj devet od desetih jih pa meni, da revščina ovira dostop do dostojnega bivališča; ker izguba stika javnih organov z državljani, ki izgubijo stanovanje, ne otežuje le namenske pomoči, ampak kaže tudi na fazo zelo hitro napredujočega procesa izključevanja posameznika iz družbe;
O. whereas homelessness is one of the most extreme forms of poverty and deprivation, and a problem which remains unresolved in all the Member States; whereas, for various reasons, most of the Member States now have large numbers of homeless people, necessitating specific measures with a view to integrating them into society; whereas, according to Eurobarometer, almost one European in four regards the excessive cost of decent housing as one of the main causes of poverty, and almost nine Europeans in ten believe poverty makes it harder to gain access to decent housing; whereas public authorities may lose contact with their citizens if the latter lose their housing, and whereas this not only makes it much harder to help them, but is also indicative of an advanced stage in the process whereby an individual becomes excluded from society;
P. ker zaradi revščine trpita tudi dostopnost in kakovost socialnih storitev na zdravstvenem, kulturnem, stanovanjskem in izobraževalnem področju;
P. whereas the accessibility and quality of social services such as health care, cultural services, housing and education are additional factors that have an impact on poverty;
Q. ker so pomanjkanje stanovanj ali nedostojna bivališča zelo hud poseg v človeško dostojanstvo, ki ima hude posledice tudi za vse druge pravice;
Q. whereas homelessness – or not having a decent home – severely erodes human dignity and has major consequences in relation to all other rights;
Košarica osnovnih potreb in storitev
Basket of basic goods and services
R. ker je prag revščine, 60 % povprečnega nacionalnega dohodka, koristen in potreben kazalnik relativne revščine, za potrebe javne politike pa ga je treba dopolniti z drugimi kazalniki, na primer pojmom in izračunom „košarice“ osnovnih življenjskih potrebščin in storitev na nacionalni ravni (kar je takojšen odziv na poseben položaj ljudi, ki živijo v revščini), in kazalniki, sprejetimi na zasedanju Sveta za zaposlovanje, socialno politiko, zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov (EPSCO) junija 2010 (tveganje revščine, materialno pomanjkanje in gospodinjstva brez delovno aktivnih članov);
R. whereas the poverty threshold of 60% of median national income is a compelling, helpful and necessary indicator of relative poverty, but should be complemented by other indicators such as the concept and calculation of a ‘basket of basic goods and services’ at national level (which is merely a short-term response to the specific situation of people suffering from poverty) and those agreed by the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs Council (EPSCO) in June 2010 (risk of poverty, material deprivation and households with very low work intensity) in response to public policy needs;
S. ker je socialna zaščita, vključno s sistemi minimalnega dohodka, temeljni element sodobnih demokracij, saj zagotavlja osnovno pravico vsakega posameznika do vključenosti v družbeno, ekonomsko, politično in kulturno življenje in ima poglavitno vlogo pri gospodarski stabilizaciji, saj omejuje vpliv kriz, ter pri vseživljenjskem prerazporejanju sredstev, saj v različnih življenjskih obdobjih preprečuje in blaži socialna tveganja, revščino in socialno izključenost;
S. whereas social protection, including minimum income systems, is a basic element of modern democracies that substantially guarantees the human right to social, economic, political and cultural participation in society and plays a key role in stabilising the economy by limiting the impact of crises, and in redistributing resources at every stage of life, while also affording protection against social risks and preventing and alleviating poverty and social exclusion, throughout the life cycle;
T. ker po navedbah OECD od 20 do 40 % socialnih izdatkov ne porabi;
T. whereas, according to the OECD, the proportion of social benefits unclaimed ranges from 20% to 40%;
U. ker sta revščina in socialna izključenost še vedno ključna družbena determinanta zdravja
U. whereas poverty and social exclusion remain a key social determinant of health
V. ker revščina najbolj ogroža specifične družbene skupine, kot so enostarševske družine, starejše ženske, manjšine, invalidi in brezdomci;
V. whereas certain sectors of society, such as one-parent families, elderly women, minorities, people with disabilities and the homeless, are among the most vulnerable groups at risk of poverty;
W. ker je glavno izhodišče temeljnih pravic načelo nediskriminacije, upoštevaje tudi socialno diskriminacijo;
W. whereas the principle of non-discrimination, including the rejection of social discrimination, is a cornerstone of the system of fundamental rights;
X. ker se bo zaradi staranja naše družbe število vzdrževanih oseb v bližnji prihodnosti občutno povečalo; ker so starejši, zlasti ženske, ki jih revščina v mnogih državah v primerjavi z ostalim prebivalstvom mnogo bolj ogroža zaradi zmanjšanja dohodkov ob upokojitvi in drugih dejavnikov, na primer fizične odvisnosti, osamljenosti in socialne izključenosti, velik problem naše družbe pa je pretrganje medgeneracijskih družbenih vezi;
X. whereas, because our society is ageing, the number of dependent people will increase considerably in the near future; whereas, in a number of countries, elderly people – in particular women – are at greater risk of poverty than the general population as a result of their loss of income on retirement and other factors such as physical dependence, solitude and social exclusion; whereas the breakdown of intergenerational social bonds is a major problem facing our societies;
Y. ker je pokojninska politika bistvena za boj proti revščini;
Y. whereas pension policies are crucial to any attempt to address poverty;
Z. ker ženske zaradi različnih dejavnikov na splošno bolj ogroža revščina kot moške, na primer zaradi diskriminacije na podlagi spola v poklicnem okolju, posledica česar so trajne razlike v plačah med spoloma, pa tudi večkratna prekinitev poklicne dejavnosti zaradi oskrbe vzdrževanih oseb, ali zaradi diskriminacije pri zaposlovanju; ker v Evropi dela samo 63 % žensk v primerjavi s 76 % moških ter ni zadosti podpornih omrežij in konkretnih ukrepov, ki bi pomagali zaposlenim ženskam pri usklajevanju družinskega in poklicnega življenja, zlasti cenovno dostopnih podpornih storitev;
Z. whereas women are in general more vulnerable to poverty than men, owing to various factors such as gender discrimination at work (which results in a persistent gender pay gap and subsequent pension disparities), career breaks to care for dependants, and labour market discrimination; whereas only 63% of women work in Europe, compared with 76% of men, and whereas there is a lack of support networks and concrete measures to help working people achieve a work/life balance, such as affordable care services;
AA. ker revščina različno vpliva na revne ženske in moške ter dečke in dekleta, saj se revne ženske in dekleta pogosteje srečujejo s težavami pri dostopu do primernih socialnih storitev in dohodka;
AA. whereas poverty impacts differently on poor women and men, boys and girls, as poor women and girls often find it more difficult to access suitable social services and income;
AB. ker platforma ne upošteva posebnih, s spolom povezanih dejavnikov žensk in moških, poleg tega pa ne posveča dovolj pozornosti feminizaciji revščine;
AB. whereas the Platform does not take into consideration the specific gender-related factors that affect women and men, and insufficient attention is paid to the feminisation of poverty;
AC. ker učinek razlik v plači med spoloma na zaslužek v vsej življenjski dobi nakazuje, da bodo imele ženske nižje pokojnine, tako da so ženske bolj izpostavljene dolgotrajni in skrajni revščini kot moški: tveganju revščine je izpostavljenih 22 % žensk, starih 65 let ali več, v primerjavi s 16 % moških;
AC. whereas the effect of the gender pay gap on lifetime earning indicates that women will have lower pensions and whereas, as a result, women are more affected than men by persistent and extreme poverty: 22 % of women aged 65 and over are at risk of poverty as compared to 16 % of men;
AD. ker je v primerjavi s 17-odstotno izpostavljenostjo celotnega evropskega prebivalstva tveganju revščine izpostavljenih 20 % otrok in so družine z nizkimi dohodki med skupinami, ki jih revščina najbolj ogroža;
AD. whereas 20% of children are at risk of poverty, compared with 17% of the EU’s overall population, and whereas low-income families are one of the groups at greatest risk of poverty;
AE. ker so družinske politike bistvene v okviru politik boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti;
AE. whereas family policies are an essential part of policies to address poverty and social exclusion;
AF. ker so prvi znaki opuščanja šolanja pomembna znamenja cikličnega obnavljanja revščine;
AF. whereas the first indications that a young person is likely to drop out of school are an early warning sign of a recurring cycle of poverty;