natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
[Dopolniti po sprejetju uredbe iz člena 291(2) PDEU o pravilih nadzora, o kateri trenutno poteka razprava v Evropskem parlamentu in Svetu.]
[To be completed following the adoption of the regulation on control mechanisms, as referred to in Article 291(2) of the TFEU, currently the subject of discussion by the European Parliament and the Council].
Komisiji pomaga Upravljalni odbor za neposredna plačila, ustanovljen 29. septembra 2003 * v skladu s členom 144 Uredbe (ES) Sveta št. 1782/2003.
The Commission shall be assisted by the Management Committee for Direct Payments established by Article 144 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003*.
Ta odbor je odbor v smislu Uredbe (EU) št. 182/2011 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2011 ** .
That committee is a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011**.
* UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p.
** UL L 55, 28.2.2011, str.
OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p.
Člen 35 – alinea 2 a (novo)
Article 35 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Če bo nova uredba začela veljati 1. januarja 2012, države članice ne smejo 1. avgusta 2012 predstaviti novega programa, veljavnega za leto 2013, saj bi to otežilo pogajanja s službami Komisije.
Should the new Regulation enter into force on 1 January 2012, the Member States shall not be required to submit a new programme by 1 August 2012 for implementation in 2013, as this would complicate the negotiating process with the Commission services.
Stabilnost programov koristi vsem udeležencem, saj zagotavlja pravno varnost in dobro načrtovanje bodočih naložb.
The stability of programmes is beneficial for all stakeholders, since it safeguards the principle of legal certainty and guarantees sound planning with a view to future investment.
Programi posebnih možnosti za najbolj oddaljene regije (POSEI) so se začeli leta 1991, da bi nudili podporo francoskim čezmorskim departmajem, in so se leto za tem razširili na najbolj oddaljene regije Portugalske in Španije.
The programme of options specific to the remote and insular nature of the outermost regions (POSEI) was set up in 1991 to provide support for the French overseas departments and was extended the following year to cover the outermost Portuguese and Spanish regions.
Te ukrepe koristi devet regij: Guadaloupe, Francoska Gvajana, Martinik, Reunion, Saint-Barthélemy in Saint-Martin za Francijo, Azori, in Madeira za Portugalsko ter Kanarski otoki za Španijo.
Nine regions are currently covered by the programme, namely: Guadeloupe, French Guyana, Martinique, Réunion, Saint-Barthélemy and Saint-Martin in France; the Azores and Madeira in Portugal; and the Canary Islands in Spain.
Predvidena je še deseta regija, francoski departma Mayotte.
A tenth region, the French overseas department of Mayotte, is currently scheduled for inclusion under the scheme.
Programi so nepogrešljivi za ohranitev in razvoj kmetijske proizvodnje in predelovalnega sektorja v teh regijah.
POSEI measures play a crucial role in supporting and developing farming and the processing industry in these regions.
Če programi POSEI ne bi obstajali, bi bila vzdržnost sektorjev, ki jim pomagajo, danes ogrožena zaradi gospodarskih težav, s katerimi se te regije soočajo in ki so nastale zaradi njihove geografske lege in zaradi nizkih marž, ki jih imajo na voljo za svoje dejavnosti.
If the POSEI programme did not exist, it would be difficult for these sectors to remain viable, owing to the economic difficulties faced by outermost regions as a result of their geographical location and the limited scope that they have for diversification.
Programi POSEI delujejo na dveh ločenih področjih.
POSEI measures fall into two categories.
Na eni strani gre za posebni režim preskrbe, namenjen preskrbi teh področij s proizvodi za krmo, predelovalni industriji in neposredni potrošnji.
The first category comprises specific supply arrangements (SSA), which cover the supply to these regions of inputs for the livestock sector, the processing industry and human consumption.
Zgornjo mejo zneska pomoči v okviru posebnega režima preskrbe določijo države, da bi se izognile nelojalni konkurenci s proizvodi z otokov.
These arrangements are subject to an aid ceiling for each Member State, designed to avoid unfair competition with island products.
Po drugi strani pa druga veja projektov POSEI, ki je bolj dosledna, porabi kakih 80 % vseh sredstev pomoči in zadeva ukrepe v prid lokalnih kmetijskih proizvodov, ki so bistveni za zagotavljanje in ohranitev vzdržnosti teh dejavnosti.
The second POSEI category, which accounts for some 80% of the overall assistance provided under the programme, comprises measures to assist local agricultural products (MLAPs) and plays a vital role in ensuring the continued viability of farming in these regions.
Zakonodaja v zvezi s programi POSEI je bila dvakrat spremenjena.
There have been two POSEI reforms.
S to reformo so se prav tako uvedle bilance oskrbe.
The reform also introduced the concept of forecast supply balances.
Z drugo in doslej največjo reformo programov POSEI leta 2006 je prišlo do 180-stopenjskega obrata pri razvojnih programih, ki so v celoti prešli v pristojnost lokalnih oblasti.
The second POSEI reform – the most extensive to date – took place in 2006 and represented a U-turn in terms of the development of the measures, with the regional authorities being given full responsibility for their formulation.
Nato je bila večkrat spremenjena Uredba (ES) št. 247/2006, predvsem zaradi približevanja zadnje reforme sheme pomoči v sektorju banan in sektorju sladkorja, ki sta bila vključena v programe POSEI.
Since then, Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 has been amended several times, principally to incorporate the changes made as part of the latest reform of the banana support scheme, which was incorporated into the POSEI programme, and the sugar reform.
Po pregledu SKP je bil proračun za neposredno pomoč premeščen na programe POSEI, kar je danes enako prvemu stebru SKP za najbolj oddaljene regije.
Furthermore, following the CAP Health Check, the budget for direct support measures was transferred to POSEI, which is now the equivalent of the first pillar of the CAP for the outermost regions.
Predlog Komisije spreminja Uredbo (ES) št. 247/2006 o pomoči najbolj oddaljenim regijam predvsem zato, da bi jo prenovila v skladu z različnimi zakonodajnimi revizijami, opravljenimi v zadnjih letih.
The Commission proposal seeks to recast Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 laying down support measures for the outermost regions.
Ta predlog poskuša prilagoditi uredbo novim določbam o delegiranih aktih in izvedbenih aktih, predvidenih v Lizbonski pogodbi.
It also seeks to bring the regulation into line with the new provisions on delegated acts and implementing acts introduced under the Lisbon Treaty.
V predlogu Komisija poskuša med drugim poenostaviti in pojasniti razumevanje uredbe, ki pokriva celo vrsto posebnih ukrepov na področju kmetijstva v prid novih najbolj oddaljenih regij Evropske unije.
The proposal also seeks to simplify and clarify the regulation, which covers all specific agricultural measures in support of the nine outermost regions referred to above.
To poenostavitev želi izkoristiti, da bi uvedla nekatere zakonodajne spremembe ob upoštevanju nenehnih težav v zadnjih letih izvajanja tega režima.
The Commission is taking advantage of this simplification to make changes to a few provisions, in order to address a number of implementation problems that have been identified over recent years.
– povišanje 20-odstotne najvišje meje režima posebne preskrbe za Francijo in Portugalsko,
– increase by 20% the maximum ceilings established for the SSA in France and Portugal,
– pogojevanje posebnega režima preskrbe z odsotnostjo vseh ovir za razvoj lokalne proizvodnje,
– make the specific supply arrangements subject to the requirement that they should not restrict the development of local production,
– opredelitev izvedbe postopka predstavitve programov in njihovih sprememb, preden jih odobri Komisija, da bi se spodbudila prožnost, programi pa bolje prilagodili dejanskim razmeram;
– incorporate clarifications on the procedure for submitting programmes and amendments for approval by the Commission, with a view to promoting flexibility and more efficiently adapting programmes to actual needs,
– prav tako omogočiti čezmorskim francoskim departmajem, da prepošljejo predelane proizvode iz surovin, ki so bile deležne ugodnosti posebnega režima pomoči, ne da bi morali plačati te ugodnosti;
– extend to the French overseas departments the possibility of re-dispatching products processed using raw materials that have benefited from specific supply arrangements without the benefit being reimbursed,
– v programe vključiti sezname neposredne pomoči, da bi zagotovili dobro upravljanje proračuna;
– include in the programmes the list of aid constituting direct payments, to ensure sound budgetary management.
– Komisija meni tudi, da bi bilo dobro navesti, kako se določa znesek pomoči za ukrepe za podporo lokalni kmetijski proizvodnji, kar prej ni bilo navedeno v osnovnem aktu.
– The Commission also considers that it would be helpful to indicate how the aid amounts for measures to encourage local agricultural products are defined, given that this was not previously indicated in the basic act.
Mnenje poročevalca
Rapporteur ’ s assessment
Kot so priznali avtorji ocenjevalnega poročila, ki ga je naročila Komisija o režimu POSEI, je rentabilnost kmetijske proizvodnje in industrije v najbolj oddaljenih regijah odvisna od tega režima.
The profitability of agricultural and industrial production in the outermost regions depends on the POSEI programme, as the authors of the evaluation report on it carried out at the Commission’s request recognise.
V tem kriznem obdobju, med katerim se te regije soočajo z brezposelnostjo, ki običajno presega brezposelnost na državni ravni, je treba ta režim ohraniti, pa tudi kar se da okrepiti.
In periods of crisis like the present, when these regions have unemployment rates that are often higher than the national averages, this programme should not only be maintained, but reinforced as much as possible.
Poročevalec obžaluje, da je sklicevanje na pravne temelje posebnega sporazuma za najbolj oddaljene regije bilo umaknjeno iz predloga, in zato predlaga, naj se ponovno uvede.
Your rapporteur regrets that the reference to the legal basis of the Treaty specifically for the outermost regions has disappeared from the Commission proposal, and therefore proposes to reintroduce it.
Člen 349 Pogodbe je edini člen, namenjen tem regijam, in zagotavlja, da se z njimi ravna na drugačen način, na kar bi se lahko v prihodnosti lahko sklicevali, če te pravne podlage ne bo.
Article 349 of the Treaty is the only article devoted to these regions, and guarantees that they will continue to receive special treatment, which in future could be called into question without this reference to the law.
Komisija in Računsko sodišče v svojem poročilu iz leta 2010 o delovanju režima POSEI poudarjata, da je ta režim uporaben za lajšanje težav, s katerimi se te regije soočajo.
Both the Commission and the Court of Auditors, in its 2010 report on the functioning of the POSEI, note that this programme plays a useful role in mitigating the problems that these regions face.
Poleg tega je jasno, da finančni prispevek za te programe (653 milijonov EUR za vse nove regije) ne zadostuje, kot to dokazuje tudi dejstvo, da je kmetijstvo v upadu in da so bile sprejete na državni ravni odločitve za nadaljnjo podporo programom POSEI z državno podporo.
However, the funding allocated to these programmes (a total of € 653 million for the nine regions) is proving to be insufficient, as is shown by the fact that agriculture is in decline and in view of some decisions taken at national level to increase POSEI support with state aid.
Strukturne težave in naraščajoč pritisk zaradi konkurence, ki jo predstavlja uvoz iz tretjih držav, so prav tako razlog za upad v številnih sektorjih.
Structural problems, and the growing pressure of competition from imports from third countries, are contributory factors in the negative growth in many sectors.
Proizvodnja banan, ki je zelo pomemben del končne kmetijske proizvodnje v najbolj oddaljenih regijah, zlasti na Kanarskih otokih (25 % celotne proizvodnje v regiji), bo morala sprejeti tarifne koncesije, ki jih Unija daje izvozu banan, ki prihajajo iz držav Latinske Amerike.
Bananas, which account for a very significant slice of final agricultural output in the outermost regions and especially in the Canary Isles (up to 25 % of total output in that region), will have to contend with the European Union’s tariff concessions to Latin American banana exports.
Pomen tega sektorja, ki je poleg sektorja paradižnika in sladkorja edini na teh otokih, ki lahko izvaža, bi lahko opravičil revizijo dodeljenih finančnih sredstev programa POSEI, da se nadomestijo izgube, ki bi jih te koncesije lahko povzročile otokom.
The importance of this sector – one of the islands’ few real exports, along with tomatoes and sugar – would to a large extent justify a revision of the POSEI financial allocations to compensate for the losses the islands’ producers may well suffer as a result of these concessions.
Poleg sektorja banan tudi so sektor paradižnika, sladkorja in ruma pod močnim zunanjim pritiskom, katerega posledice bi Komisija morala pravilno oceniti.
But there are other products in the islands besides bananas – tomatoes, sugar and rum for example – that also have to contend with strong external pressures and the European Commission should analyse properly the impact of these pressures.
Zaradi posebnosti teh regij je njihova proizvodnja še bolj občutljiva na povečanje uvoza iz tretjih držav, saj je stroškom zaradi oddaljenosti in izoliranosti treba dodati še stroške zaradi strogih meril glede prehranske varnosti in varstva okolja.
The specific circumstances of these regions accentuates their products’ vulnerability in the face of rising imports from third countries, since alongside costs arising from their remoteness and isolation they also have costs arising from the need to comply with high food safety and environmental standards.
Zelo malo je alternativ za kulture in proizvodnjo na otokih, kar je argument v prid sprejetja najustreznejših ukrepov za preprečitev zmanjšanja donosnosti kmetijske proizvodnje in vzreje, tudi zato, ker si v zadnjih letih prizadevajo nuditi visokokakovostne proizvode.
The scarcity of alternatives to the islands’ crops and products is also a weighty argument for adopting measures that are the most appropriate to preventing farmers’ and stock-breeders’ profits deteriorating, bearing in mind in addition the efforts made in recent years to supply high-quality products.
Poročevalec meni, da morajo pristojne oblasti še naprej imeti velik manevrski prostor za upravljanje programov, saj se ukrepi najučinkovitejše prilagodijo dejanskim potrebam na regionalni ravni.
The rapporteur is in favour of the competent authorities continuing to have a wide margin of flexibility in managing programmes since it is at regional level that measures can be adapted most effectively to meet real needs.
To prožnost je treba zagotoviti in okrepiti udeležbo zadevnih sektorjev.
This flexibility should be guaranteed, as should increased consultation with the sectors concerned.
Poročevalec meni, da ni treba bistveno spreminjati dveh velikih poglavij programa POSEI: posebni režim pomoči in ukrepe v prid lokalnih kmetijskih proizvodov.
As regards the two main chapters of the POSEI programmes (SSA and the measures to support the local agricultural production), the rapporteur feels that these should not undergo substantial modifications.
Vendar poziva države članice, naj nemudoma (kolikor je mogoče) izboljšajo načrtovanje ukrepov za pomoč lokalni proizvodnji, da se poveča učinkovitost pomoči, dodeljene različnim sektorjem.
However, he urges the Member States to improve programming of support measures for local products as far as is possible, in order to make the aid to the various sectors more effective.
Države bi prav tako morale posebno pozornost nameniti morebitnim negativnim posledicam za lokalno proizvodnjo, do katerih bi lahko prišlo zaradi neustrezne uporabe posebnega režima pomoči.
Furthermore, Member States should pay particular attention to the possible negative impacts on local products that could arise from inappropriate use of SSA.
Kulture v najbolj oddaljenih regijah so v zadnjih letih čutile posledice množičnega prihoda škodljivih organizmov, do katerega je prišlo zaradi povečanja trgovinske izmenjave.
In recent years crops in the outermost regions have been affected by the arrival of harmful organisms in large numbers, as a consequence of more trade.
Proizvajalci se soočajo s številnimi paraziti, zaradi česar je treba okrepiti fitosanitarne programe in njihovo izvajanje na Kanarskih otokih ter na kulturi banan, ob tem pa upoštevati, da je treba krepiti trajnostne načine pridelave.
Producers are having to tackle a substantial rise in pest numbers, a fact that justifies stepping up phytosanitary programmes and extending them to the Canary Isles and to bananas, while bearing in mind the need to encourage sustainable practices.
Poročevalec meni, da mora Unija na mejah okrepiti nadzor nad uvozom iz tretjih držav, katerih proizvodnja bi morala izpolnjevati iste veterinarske in fitosanitarne zahteve, kot jih upoštevajo kmetje in živinorejci najbolj oddaljenih regij, da bi se tako lokalni proizvajalci izognili nelojalni konkurenci.
The rapporteur is of the opinion that it would furthermore be advisable for the European Union to step up border controls on imports from third countries, whose products should comply with the same veterinary and phytosanitary requirements as those of farmers and stock-breeders from the outermost regions in order to prevent unfair competition with local products.
Zadeva: Mnenje o pravni podlagi o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije ( KOM(2010)0498 )
Subject: Opinion on the legal basis of the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union [ COM(2010)0498 ]
v pismu z dne 8. junija 2011 ste Odbor za pravne zadeve v skladu s členom 37 poslovnika Parlamenta zaprosili za mnenje o dodatni pravni podlagi zgoraj omenjenega predloga uredbe.
By letter of 8 June 2011 you asked the Committee on Legal Affairs, pursuant to Rule 37 of the Rules of Procedure, to consider the addition of a legal basis to the above proposal for a regulation.
Komisija kot pravno podlago predlaga prvi pododstavek člena 42 in člen 43(2) PDEU, ki sodita v naslov III o kmetijstvu in ribištvu tretjega dela PDEU z naslovom „Notranje politike in ukrepi Unije“.
The legal bases proposed by the Commission are the first subparagraph of Article 42 and Article 43(2) TFEU, both of which fall under Title III on "Agriculture and Fisheries" of Part Three of the TFEU, entitled "Union Policies and Internal Actions".
Predlaga se, da se kot pravna podlaga doda člen 349 PDEU, ki sodi v sedmi del PDEU o splošnih in končnih določbah; ta člen določa postopek za sprejetje posebnih ukrepov, ki določajo zlasti pogoje za uporabo pogodb v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije.
The legal basis proposed to be added is Article 349 TFEU under Part Seven of the TFEU on "General and Final Provisions", which article sets out the procedure for adopting specific measures aimed, in particular, at laying down the conditions of application of the Treaties to the outermost regions of the Union.
Komisija je z obravnavanim predlogom začela postopek za prenovitev Uredbe (ES) št. 247/2006 z dne 30. januarja 2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije
With the proposal at hand the Commission has initiated the procedure for a recasting of Regulation (EC) 247/2006 of 30 January 2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union
1. za večjo jasnost in da bi jo uskladila z Lizbonsko pogodbo, zlasti glede delegiranih in izvedbenih aktov po členih 290 in 291 PDEU.
1. in the interest of clarity and in order to bring it into conformity with the Lisbon Treaty, notably concerning delegated and implementing acts according to Articles 290 and 291 TFEU.
Pravna podlaga za Uredbo (ES) št. 247/2006 so bili členi 36, 37 in 299(2) PES; kar ustreza členom 42, 43 in 349 PDEU.
The legal bases for Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 were Articles 36, 37 and 299(2) TEC, which correspond to Articles 42, 43 and 349 TFEU, respectively.
Uredbo (ES) št. 247/2006 spremlja uredba Komisije
Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 is accompanied by a Commission Regulation
Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 793/2006 z dne 12. aprila 2006 o nekaterih podrobnih pravilih za izvajanje Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 247/2006 o posebnih ukrepih za kmetijstvo v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Unije (UL L 145, 31.5.2006, str.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 793/2006 of 12 April 2006 laying down certain detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) 247/2006 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union (OJ L 145, 31.5.2006, p.
1). , sprejeta na podlagi člena 25 temeljnega akta, ki vsebuje natančne določbe o njegovem izvrševanju in ki je bila trikrat spremenjena, nazadnje leta 2009.
1). , adopted on the basis of Article 25 of the basic act, containing detailed rules on its application, which has been amended three times, the last time in 2009.
Odbor za regionalni razvoj in Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor sta v svojih mnenjih o predlogu predlagala, da se kot pravna podlaga doda člen 349 PDEU.
In their respective opinions on the proposal, the Committee on Regional Development and the European Economic and Social Committee have both recommended the addition of Article 349 TFEU to the legal basis.
II - Ustrezni členi PDEU
II - Relevant Articles of the TFEU
Kot pravna podlaga so v predlogu Komisije predstavljeni naslednji členi (dodani poudarki označujejo operativne določbe):
The following Articles are presented as the legal bases in the Commission proposal (the added emphasis indicates the operative provisions):
(a) povečati kmetijsko produktivnost s pospeševanjem tehničnega napredka in zagotavljanjem racionalnega razvoja kmetijske proizvodnje ter z optimalno uporabo proizvodnih dejavnikov, zlasti delovne sile;
(a) to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technical progress and by ensuring the rational development of agricultural production and the optimum utilisation of the factors of production, in particular labour;
(b) s tem zagotoviti primerno življenjsko raven kmetijske skupnosti, zlasti s povečanjem individualnega zaslužka oseb, ki se ukvarjajo s kmetijstvom;
(b) thus to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture;
(c) stabilizirati trge
(c) to stabilise markets;
(d) zagotoviti redno preskrbo;
(d) to assure the availability of supplies;
(e) zagotoviti, da je preskrba potrošnikom dostopna po primernih cenah.
(e) to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.
Pri oblikovanju skupne kmetijske politike in posebnih metod za njeno izvajanje se upošteva:
In working out the common agricultural policy and the special methods for its application, account shall be taken of:
(a) posebna narava kmetijske dejavnosti, ki je posledica socialne strukture kmetijstva ter strukturnih in naravnih neskladij med različnimi kmetijskimi regijami;
(a) the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions;
(b) potreba, da se ustrezne prilagoditve izvedejo postopno;
(b) the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees;
(c) dejstvo, da je kmetijstvo v državah članicah sektor, ki je tesno povezan s celotnim gospodarstvom.
(c) the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole.