natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Za člane osebja s prejšnjimi pogodbami, ki se odločijo, da ne bodo zaprosili za pogodbe za začasne uslužbence, ali ki jim niso ponujene pogodbe za začasne uslužbence v skladu z odstavkom 2, se še naprej uporabljajo ustrezna nacionalna zakonodaja v zvezi s pogodbami o zaposlitvi in drugi ustrezni instrumenti.
The relevant national law relating to labour contracts and other relevant instruments shall continue to apply to staff members with prior contracts who choose not to apply for temporary agent's contracts or who are not offered temporary agents contracts in accordance with paragraph 2.
Člen 63a
Article 63a
Države članice sprejmejo ustrezne določbe, ki zagotavljajo učinkovito uporabo te uredbe.
The Member States shall make such provision as is appropriate to ensure the effective application of this Regulation.
Člen 64 Spremembe
Article 64 Amendments
Sklep Sveta in Parlamenta
Council and Parliament Decision
se spremeni tako, da se Odbor evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje odstrani s seznama upravičencev iz oddelka B priloge k temu sklepu.
is hereby amended insofar as the Committee of European Securities Regulators is removed from the list of beneficiaries set out in Section B of the Annex to that Decision.
Člen 65 Razveljavitev
Article 65 Repeal
Sklep Komisije 2009/77/ES o ustanovitvi Odbora evropskih zakonodajalcev za vrednostne papirje se razveljavi
Commission Decision 2009/77/EC, establishing the Committee of European Securities Regulators, is hereby repealed
s 1. januarjem 2011
with effect from 1 January 2011
Šest mesecev od začetka veljavnosti te uredbe.
six months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži potrebne predloge za okrepitev nadzora nad institucijami, ki lahko pomenijo sistemsko tveganje iz člena 12b, in ustanovitev novega okvira za obvladovanje finančne krize, vključno z ureditvijo financiranja.
, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council the necessary proposals to strengthen supervision of institutions that may pose a systemic risk referred to in Article 12b and the establishment of a new framework for financial crisis management including funding arrangements.
in vsaka tri leta po tem
and every three years thereafter, the Commission shall
predloži Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu potrebne predloge za zagotavljanje vzpostavitve zanesljivega okvira za reševanje, vključno s sistemi prispevkov udeležencev na finančnem trgu za omejevanje sistemskih tveganj, in
submit to the European Parliament and the Council the necessary proposals to ensure the establishment of a credible resolution framework including systems of contributions by financial market participants to contain systemic risks and
med drugim ovrednoteno tudi
That report shall ▌ evaluate
konvergenca, ki so jo dosegli pristojni organi pri nadzornih praksah;
the convergence in supervisory practices reached by competent authorities;
delovanje kolegijev nadzornih organov,
the functioning of the colleges of supervisors;
napredek, dosežen pri konvergenci na področju preprečevanja, upravljanja in reševanja kriz, vključno z evropskimi mehanizmi financiranja;
progress achieved towards convergence in the fields of crisis prevention, management and resolution, including European funding mechanisms;
ali bi bilo treba, zlasti glede na napredek, dosežen v zvezi z vprašanji iz točke (c), okrepiti vlogo organa pri nadzoru nad udeleženci na finančnem trgu, ki pomenijo sistemsko tveganje, in ali bi moral imeti nad njimi večja nadzorna pooblastila;
whether, notably in light of the progress achieved with regard to the issues referred to in (c), the role of the Authority in the supervision of financial market participants posing a potential systemic risk should be strengthened and whether it should exercise enhanced supervisory powers over those market participants;
uporaba zaščitne klavzule, ki jo določa člen 23, in zlasti, ali ta klavzula neprimerno preprečuje organu, da bi izpolnil svojo vlogo, ki je določena v tej uredbi.
the application of the Safeguard clause established in Article 23 and in particular whether this clause may unduly prevent the Authority from fulfilling its role as set out in this Regulation.
Poročilo iz odstavka 1 ocenjuje tudi, ali:
The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall also examine whether:
je primerno organe prestaviti na en sam sedež, da bi dosegli boljše usklajevanje med njimi;
it is appropriate to move the Authorities to a single seat to enhance a better coordination between them;
je ustrezno nadaljevati z ločenim nadzorom nad bančništvom, zavarovalništvom, poklicnimi pokojninami ter trgi vrednostnih papirjev in finančnimi trgi;
it is appropriate to continue separate supervision of banking, insurance, occupational pensions, securities and financial markets;
je ustrezno opravljati nadzor nad bonitetnim nadzorom in poslovanjem ločeno ali pa je bolje, če to počne isti nadzornik,
it is appropriate to supervise prudential supervision and the conduct of business separately or by the same supervisor;
je primerno poenostaviti in okrepiti strukturo Evropskega sistema finančnih nadzornih organov zaradi večje povezanosti med makro in mikro ravnjo ter evropskimi nadzornimi organi;
it is appropriate to simplify and reinforce the architecture of the ESFS in order to increase the coherence between the macro and the micro levels and between the ESAs;
je razvoj Evropskega sistema finančnega nadzora skladen z globalnim razvojem;
the evolution of the ESFS is consistent with that of the global evolution;
je znotraj Evropskega sistema finančnega nadzora dovolj različnosti in odličnosti;
there is sufficient diversity and excellence within the ESFS;
sta odgovornost in preglednost, povezani z zahtevami objave, primerni;
accountability and transparency in relation to publication requirements are adequate;
ima organ primeren sedež;
the appropriateness of the seat of the Authority;
je ustanovitev sklada za stabilnost za vrednostne papirje in trge na ravni EU najboljša obramba pred izkrivljanjem konkurence ter najučinkovitejši način za spopadanje s neuspehom čezmejnih udeležencev na trgu.
to establish a Stability Fund for Securities and Markets at EU level as the best defence against competitive distortion and most efficient way to deal with the failure of a cross-border market participants.
Člen 67 Začetek veljavnosti
Article 67 Entry into force
Uporablja se od 1. januarja 2011
It shall apply from 1 January 2011
Organ se ustanovi na datum, ko se začne uporabljati ta uredba
The Authority shall be established on the date of application
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o makrobonitetnem nadzoru finančnega sistema v Skupnosti in o ustanovitvi Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja ( KOM(2009)0499 – C7-0166/2009 – 2009/0140(COD) )
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community macro prudential oversight of the financial system and establishing a European Systemic Risk Board ( COM(2009)0499 – C7-0166/2009 – 2009/0140(COD) )
Predlog je bil 7. julija 2010 spremenjen kot sledi Zadeva je bila v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 57(2) vrnjena v odbor ( A7-0168/2010 ).
The proposal was amended on 7 July 2010 as follows The matter was then referred back to committee pursuant to Rule 57(2), second subparagraph ( A7-0168/2010 ).
UREDBA EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA IN SVETA
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 114 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske centralne banke UL C 270, 11.11.2009, str.
Having regard to the opinion of the European Central Bank OJ C 270, 11.11.2009, p.
Finančna stabilnost je prvi pogoj za zagotavljanje delovnih mest, kreditov in rasti v realnem gospodarstvu.
Financial stability is a precondition for the real economy to provide jobs, credit and growth.
Finančna kriza je razkrila velike pomanjkljivosti na področju finančnega nadzora, ki ni preprečil kopičenja prevelikih tveganj v finančnem sistemu
The financial crisis has revealed important shortcomings in financial supervision, which has failed to prevent the accumulation of excessive risks within the financial system
Kriza ima zelo velike posledice za davkoplačevalce, številne državljane Unije, ki so zdaj brezposelni, ter številna mala in srednja podjetja.
The crisis has huge consequences for the tax payers, for many Union citizens who are now unemployed and for many small and medium size enterprises (SMEs).
Že dolgo pred finančno krizo je Evropski parlament redno pozival h krepitvi resnično enakih pogojev za vse udeležence na ravni Unije in obenem opozarjal na precejšnje pomanjkljivosti pri nadzoru Unije nad vedno bolj integriranimi finančnimi trgi (v svojih resolucijah z dne 13. aprila 2000 o sporočilu Komisije o izvajanju okvira za finančne trge: akcijski načrt
Long before the financial crisis, the European Parliament was already calling regularly for the reinforcement of a true level playing field for all actors at the Union level while pointing out significant failures in the Union's supervision of ever more integrated financial markets (in its resolutions of 13 April 2000 on the Commission communication on implementing the framework for financial markets: Action Plan
, z dne 22. aprila 2009 o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o začetku opravljanja in opravljanju dejavnosti zavarovanja in pozavarovanja (Solventnost II)
, of 22 April 2009 on the amended proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)
in z dne 23. aprila 2009 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o bonitetnih agencijah
and of 23 April 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Credit Rating Agencies
Novembra 2008 je Komisija pooblastila skupino na visoki ravni pod predsedstvom Jacquesa de Larosièra („de Larosièrova skupina“), da pripravi priporočila, kako okrepiti evropsko nadzorno ureditev, da bi se bolje zaščitili državljani in ponovno vzpostavilo zaupanje v finančni sistem.
In November 2008, the Commission mandated a High Level Group chaired by Mr Jacques de Larosière (the ‘de Larosière Group’) to make recommendations on how to strengthen European supervisory arrangements with a view to better protecting its citizens and rebuilding trust in the financial system.
De Larosièrova skupina je v končnem poročilu, ki ga je predstavila 25. februarja 2009
In its final report presented on 25 February 2009
(de Larosièrovo poročilo)
(the de Larosière Report)
Komisija je v sporočilu „Spodbujanje okrevanja evropskega gospodarstva“ z dne 4. marca 2009 pozdravila in podprla glavne usmeritve priporočil de Larosièrove skupine.
In its Communication entitled ‘Driving European Recovery’ of 4 March 2009, the Commission welcomed and broadly supported the recommendations of the de Larosière Group.
Evropski svet se je na seji 19. in 20. marca 2009 dogovoril o potrebi po izboljšanju regulacije in nadzora na področju finančnih institucij v EU ter da bo podlaga za ukrepanje de Larosièrovo poročilo.
At its meeting of 19 and 20 March 2009, the European Council agreed on the need to improve the regulation and supervision of financial institutions within the EU and to use the report from the de Larosière Group as a basis for action.
Komisija je v sporočilu z naslovom „Evropski finančni nadzor“ z dne 27. maja 2009 določila vrsto reform sedanjih ureditev za varovanje finančne stabilnosti na ravni
In its Communication entitled ‘European Financial Supervision’ of 27 May 2009, the Commission set out a series of reforms to the current arrangements for safeguarding financial stability at
, med katere zlasti spada tudi ustanovitev Evropskega odbora za sistemska tveganja (ESRB), odgovornega za makrobonitetni nadzor.
level, notably including the creation of a European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) responsible for macro-prudential oversight.
V skladu s stališči Komisije je Svet med drugim sklenil, da bi ECB „morala ESRB zagotavljati analitično, statistično, upravno in logistično podporo ter pri tem v tehničnem smislu uporabiti tudi nasvete nacionalnih centralnih bank in nadzornih organov“.
In line with the views of the Commission, it concluded inter alia that the ECB ‘should provide analytical, statistical, administrative and logistical support to the ESRB, also drawing on technical advice from national central banks and supervisors’.
Podpora, ki jo ECB zagotavlja ESRB, pa tudi naloge, prenesene na ESRB in njemu dodeljene, ne bi smele posegati v načelo neodvisnosti ECB pri izvajanju njenih nalog v skladu s Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije.
The support provided by the ECB to the ESRB as well as the tasks conferred upon and assigned to the ESRB should be without prejudice to the principle of the independence of the ECB in the performance of its tasks pursuant to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Zaradi povezovanja mednarodnih finančnih trgov mora biti Unija izredno dejavna na svetovni ravni.
Given the integration of international financial markets, there is a need for a strong commitment on the part of the Union at the global level.
ESRB bi moral uporabiti strokovno znanje znanstvenega odbora na visoki ravni ter prevzeti vse globalne odgovornosti, ki so potrebne za zagotovitev prepoznavnosti stališča Unije v zvezi z vprašanji finančne stabilnosti, zlasti s tesnim sodelovanjem z Mednarodnim denarnim skladom, Odborom za finančno stabilnost ter z vsemi partnerji skupine G-20.
The ESRB should draw expertise from a high-level scientific committee and take on all the global responsibilities required in order to ensure that the voice of the Union is heard on financial stability matters, in particular in cooperating closely with the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Financial Services Board (FSB) and all the partners of the Group of Twenty (G-20).
Evropski odbor za sistemska tveganja bi moral med drugim prispevati k izvajanju priporočil Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, Odbora za finančno stabilnost in Banke za mednarodne poravnave skupini G-20 pri začetni obravnavi njihovega poročila o smernicah za ocenjevanje sistemske pomembnosti finančnih institucij, trgov in instrumentov, objavljenega oktobra 2009, ki določa, da je treba sistemsko tveganje obravnavati dinamično, da bi se upošteval razvoj finančnega sektorja in svetovnega gospodarstva.
The ESRB should contribute, inter alia, towards implementing the recommendations of the IMF, the FSB and the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) to the G-20, in the initial consideration of their report on Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions, Markets and Instruments published in October 2009 which states that systemic risk must be dynamic to take into account the evolution of the financial sector and of the global economy.
Sistemsko tveganje se lahko pojmuje kot tveganje za razkroj finančnih storitev, ki ga povzročijo motnje v delovanju celotnega finančnega sistema ali njegovih delov in ki ima lahko resne negativne posledice za realno gospodarstvo.
Systemic risk may be seen as a risk of disruption to financial services that is caused by an impairment of all or parts of the financial system and has the potential to have serious negative consequences for the real economy.
Poročilo o smernicah za ocenjevanje sistemske pomembnosti finančnih institucij prav tako navaja, da se ocena sistemskega tveganja lahko razlikuje glede na gospodarsko okolje.
The report on Guidance to Assess the Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions also states that the assessment of systemic risk is likely to vary depending on the economic environment.
Ocene bodo prav tako odvisne od finančne infrastrukture in ukrepov kriznega upravljanja ter sposobnosti obvladovanja motenj, ko se te pojavijo.
It will also be conditioned by the financial infrastructure and crisis management arrangements, and the capacity to deal with failures when they occur.
Ocena, ki temelji na teh treh merilih, bi morala biti dopolnjena glede na šibke točke v finančnem sistemu in zmožnost institucionalnega okvira za obvladovanje finančnih motenj.
An assessment based on those three criteria should be complemented with reference to financial vulnerabilities and the capacity of the institutional framework to deal with financial failures.
Naloga ESRB bi moralo biti spremljanje in ocenjevanje sistemskega tveganja v običajnih razmerah, da se ublaži izpostavljenost sistema nevarnosti odpovedi sistemskih sestavnih delov ter okrepi odpornost finančnega sistema proti pretresom.
The ESRB's task should be to monitor and assess systemic risk in normal times for the purpose of mitigating the exposure of the system to the risk of failure of systemic components and enhancing the financial system's resilience to shocks.
V zvezi s tem bi moral ESRB zagotavljati finančno stabilnost ter ublažiti negativne posledice za notranji trg in realno gospodarstvo.
In this respect, the ESRB should ensure financial stability and mitigate the negative impacts on the internal market and the real economy.
Za uresničitev svojih ciljev bi moral ESRB analizirati vse zadevne informacije, zlasti zadevno zakonodajo, ki bi lahko vplivala na finančno stabilnost, kot so pravila o računovodstvu, stečaju in reševanju v primeru krize.
In order to accomplish its objectives, the ESRB should analyse all the relevant information, in particular relevant legislation with a potential impact on financial stability, such as accounting, bankruptcy and bail-out rules.
Pravilno delovanje Unije in globalnih finančnih sistemov ter blažitev nevarnostim, ki jim pretijo, zahteva večjo usklajenost med makro- in mikronadzorom.
A proper functioning of Union and global financial systems and the mitigation of threats thereto require enhanced consistency between macro and the micro supervision.
V Turnerjevem pregledu iz marca 2009 z naslovom „A regulatory response to the global banking crisis“ (Regulativni odziv na globalno bančno krizo) je navedeno, da „boljše ureditve zahtevajo večje nacionalne pristojnosti, kar pomeni manj odprt notranji trg, ali pa večjo stopnjo evropske integracije“.
As stated in the Turner review, ‘A regulatory response to the global banking crisis’, of March 2009, ‘Sounder arrangements require either increased national powers, implying a less open single market, or a greater degree of European integration’.
Novo oblikovani sistem nadzora na makroravni zahteva verodostojno in visoko strokovno usposobljeno vodstvo.
This newly designed system of macro supervision requires credible and high-profile leadership.
Glede na njegovo ključno vlogo ter mednarodno in notranjo verodostojnost in v duhu Larosièrovega poročila bi zato ESRB moral predsedovati predsednik ECB.
Therefore, given its key role and its international and internal credibility, and in the spirit of the de Larosière Report, the President of the ECB should be the Chair of the ESRB.
Poleg tega bi bilo treba poostriti zahteve glede odgovornosti ter razširiti sestavo organov ESRB, da bi zajeli širok spekter izkušenj, izobrazbe in mnenj.
In addition, the accountability requirements should be increased as well as the enlargement of the composition of the ERSB bodies to encompass a wide range of experience, backgrounds and opinions.
V Larosièrovem poročilu je tudi navedeno, da makrobonitetni nadzor ni smiseln, če nikakor ne more vplivati na nadzor na mikroravni, medtem ko mikrobonitetni nadzor ne more učinkovito varovati finančne stabilnosti brez ustreznega upoštevanja dogodkov na makroravni.
The de Larosière Report also states that macro-prudential supervision is not meaningful unless it can somehow impact on supervision at the micro-level whilst micro-prudential supervision cannot effectively safeguard financial stability without adequately taking account of macro-level developments.
Treba je vzpostaviti Evropski sistem finančnega nadzora (ESFS), ki bi združeval vršilce finančnega nadzora tako na nacionalni ravni kot na ravni Unije, da bi ti delovali kot mreža.
A European System of Financial Supervision (ESFS) should be established, gathering the actors of financial supervision both at a national and at the Union level, to act as a network.
V skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja iz člena 4(3) Pogodbe o EU bi si morali sodelujoči v ESFS zaupati in se medsebojno spoštovati, zlasti pri zagotavljanju ustreznih in zanesljivih tokov informacij med njimi.
Pursuant to the principle of sincere cooperation in accordance with Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the parties to the ESFS should cooperate with trust and full mutual respect, in particular to ensure that appropriate and reliable information flows between them.
Na ravni Unije bi morali mrežo sestavljati ESRB in trije nadzorni organi na mikroravni: Evropski nadzorni organ (bančništvo), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. .../2010, Evropski nadzorni organ (vrednostni papirji in trgi), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. .../2010, in Evropski nadzorni organ (zavarovanja in poklicne pokojnine), ustanovljen z Uredbo (EU) št. .../2010.
At the Union level, the network should comprise the ESRB and three micro-supervisory authorities: the European Supervisory Authority (Banking), established by Regulation (EU) No …/2010, the European Supervisory Authority (Securities and Markets), established by Regulation (EU) No …/2010, and the European Supervisory Authority (Insurance and Occupational Pensions) established by Regulation (EU) No …/2010.
ESBR bi morali imeti splošni odbor, pripravljalni odbor, sekretariat in svetovalni znanstveni odbor.
The ESRB should comprise a General Board, a Steering Committee, a Secretariat, and an Advisory Scientific Committee.
ESRB bi moral po potrebi izdajati
The ESRB should, where appropriate, issue
in objavljati
and make public
splošna opozorila in priporočila v zvezi s celotno
warnings and recommendations of a general nature concerning the
, posameznimi državami članicami ali skupinami držav članic, pri čemer bi določil rok za ustrezen politični odziv.
as a whole, individual Member States or groups of Member States, with a specified timeline for the relevant policy response.
Kadar so takšna opozorila ali priporočila naslovljena na posamezno državo članico ali skupino držav članic, ima ESRB lahko možnost, da predlaga ustrezne podporne ukrepe.
Where such warnings or recommendations are addressed to individual, or a group of, Member States, it may be possible for the ESRB to propose appropriate support measures.
Po potrebi lahko Komisija na lastno pobudo ali na zahtevo ESRB, enega od organov, Evropskega parlamenta ali Sveta sprejme odločbo, naslovljeno na enega od organov, v kateri ugotovi izredne razmere.
Where appropriate, the Commission on its own initiative or at the request of the ESRB, an Authority, the European Parliament or the Council, may adopt a decision addressed to an Authority, determining the existence of an emergency situation
ESRB bi se moral odločiti, ali naj priporočilo ostane zaupno ali naj se objavi, pri čemer se mora zavedati, da javno razkritje lahko v nekaterih okoliščinah prispeva k upoštevanju priporočil.
The ESRB should decide whether a recommendation should be kept confidential or made public, bearing in mind that public disclosure can help to foster compliance with the recommendations in certain circumstances.
ESRB bi moral izdelati barvno kodo, s katero bi zainteresiranim stranem omogočil boljše ocenjevanje narave tveganj.
A colour code should be elaborated by the ESRB, in order to allow interested parties better to assess the nature of the risk.
Pomen in legitimnost takšnih opozoril in priporočil bi povečali tako, da bi jih pošiljali prek
In order to increase their weight and legitimacy, such warnings and recommendations should be transmitted through
in, kadar bi bilo to primerno,
and, where appropriate, the
ESRB bi moral na podlagi poročil naslovnikov tudi spremljati upoštevanje svojih priporočil, s čimer bi zagotovil učinkovito upoštevanje svojih opozoril in priporočil.
The ESRB should also monitor compliance with its recommendations, based on reports from addressees, in order to ensure that its warnings and recommendations are effectively followed.