natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva države članice, naj več virov sredstev namenijo za Frontex in s tem omogočijo, da se poveča področje delovanja in učinkovitost začetih akcij;
Calls on Member States to make more resources available to Frontex, in order to allow it to increase the scope and effectiveness of the missions undertaken;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0430/2006
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0430/2006
ki ga vlagajo Etelka Barsi-Pataky v imenu skupine PPE-DE,
by Etelka Barsi-Pataky, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group,
Norbert Glante v imenu skupine PSE,
Norbert Glante, on behalf of the PSE Group,
Fiona Hall v imenu skupine ALDE,
Fiona Hall, on behalf of the ALDE Group,
Eva Lichtenberger v imenu skupine Verts/ALE,
Eva Lichtenberger, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group,
Jaromír Kohlíček, Vladimír Remek, Umberto Guidoni in Esko Seppänen v imenu skupine GUE/NGL,
Jaromír Kohlíček, Vladimír Remek, Umberto Guidoni and Esko Seppänen, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group,
Umberto Pirilli in Eugenijus Maldeikis v imenu skupine UEN
Umberto Pirilli and Eugenijus Maldeikis, on behalf of the UEN Group
o pregledu stanja programa Galileo
on taking stock of the Galileo programme
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o pregledu stanja programa Galileo (KOM(2006)272),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on taking stock of the Galileo programme (COM(2006) 272),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o izvajanju uvajalne in obratovalne faze Evropskega satelitskega radionavigacijskega programa (KOM(2004)477),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the deployment and commercial operating phases of the European programme of satellite radio navigation programme (COM(2004) 477),
ob upoštevanju poročila Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave ( A6-0212/2005 ) o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu (KOM(2004)477),
having regard to the report of the European Parliament at first reading ( A6-0212/2005 ) on the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004) 477),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta št. 876/2002 (ES) o ustanovitvi skupnega podjetja Galileo,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002 setting up the Galileo Joint Undertaking,
ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja statute o ustanovitvi skupnega podjetja Galileo, priloženega Uredbi Sveta (ES) št. 876/2002,
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation amending the Statutes of the Galileo Joint Undertaking annexed to Council Regulation (EC) No 876/2002,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1321/2004 o vzpostavitvi upravljavskih struktur Evropskega satelitskega radionavigacijskega sistema,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes,
ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Sveta, ki spreminja Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1321/2004 o vzpostavitvi upravljavskih struktur Evropskega satelitskega radionavigacijskega sistema,
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004 on the establishment of structures for the management of the European satellite radio-navigation programmes,
ob upoštevanju členov 108(5) in 103(2) svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 108(5) and 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker je Galileo prva evropska infrastruktura, ki jo upravlja Skupnost, in zato predstavlja nove izzive zakonodaji in financiranju; ker pravno in postopkovno ozadje ni projektno naravnano,
whereas Galileo is the first European infrastructure to be managed by the Community and therefore poses new challenges, both regulatory and financial; whereas the legal and procedural background is not project-oriented,
ker je Parlament s svojo zakonodajno in proračunsko pristojnostjo Zakonodajna resolucija EP z dne 5. septembra 2005. v celoti podprl program Galileo ter priznal, da je Galileo strateški projekt, eden najpomembnejših stebrov lizbonske strategije, in da ponuja velike priložnosti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem,
whereas Parliament has given its full support to the Galileo programme, through its legislative and budgetary responsibilities EP legislative resolution of 5 September 2005. , recognising that Galileo is a strategic project, one of the most important pillars of the Lisbon strategy, and offers great opportunities to SMEs,
ker so evropski inženirji in razvijalci, ki delajo v Evropski vesoljski agenciji, opravili pomembno delo, ugotavlja, da je prvi eksperimentalni satelit GIOVE-A že izpolnil svoje glavno poslanstvo, da so tehnični vidiki primerni ter da je zdaj najpomembnejši element za pripravo projekta dobro vodenje,
whereas European engineers and developers working within the European Space Agency and in the space industry have done a great job; noting that the first experimental satellite GIOVE-A has already fulfilled its main mission, that the technical aspects are in place and that now the most important element for bringing the project forward is good governance,
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj presodi, kako spremeniti pravno in postopkovno ureditev, da bo zagotovljen trajen napredek projekta; poudarja, da to ne pomeni zmanjšanja pristojnosti in odgovornosti institucij, ampak lahko pomeni uporabo ustvarjalnejših in ustreznejših rešitev za doseganje ciljev programa;
Calls on the Commission to assess what modifications in legal and procedural regulations could be made in order to ensure the continuous progress of the project; points out that this does not imply reducing the competences and responsibilities of institutions, but may mean the application of solutions that are more creative and more appropriate to the objectives of the programme;
priznava novi, posodobljeni časovni razpored in poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj ga upošteva in zagotovi skladnost z njim; skupaj z odobritvijo koncesijske pogodbe zahteva, naj se ga obvešča o dodatnih stroških zaradi zamude; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj Parlament obvešča o vsaki prihodnji večji spremembi, vendar pravočasno, ne z večletno zamudo;
Acknowledges the new updated timetable and calls on the Commission to comply with it and to enforce compliance; together with the approval of the concession contract, asks to be informed about the additional costs resulting from the delay; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to inform Parliament about any significant future alterations, but in a timely fashion, not with a delay of years;
pozdravlja napredek pri pogajanjih s koncesionarji; poziva vse, vpletene?strani evropske vesoljske industrije, ki sodelujejo v konzorciju, naj si konstruktivno prizadevajo za dosego sporazuma, tako da bo lahko ta projekt takoj, ko bo mogoče, udeležen pri izpolnjevanju lizbonskih ciljev;
Welcomes the progress made in negotiations with the concessionaries; calls on the parties concerned in the European space industry participating in the consortium to strive to reach agreement in a constructive manner, so that this common European project can play its part in fulfilling the Lisbon goals as soon as possible;
poziva nadzorni organ GNSS, naj Parlamentu poda polletno poročilo o napredku, s posebnim poudarkom na napredku pri nalogah, ki jih nadzornemu organu GNSS nalaga direktiva s 1. januarja 2007;
Calls on the GNSS Supervisory Authority to deliver semi-annual progress reports to Parliament, with special regard to progress in tasks to be imposed upon the GNSS Supervisory Authority by directive from 1 January 2007;
poziva nadzorni organ GNSS, naj povabi strokovnjaka, ki ga imenuje Evropski parlament, da nadaljuje status opazovalca v skladu s členom 5(5) Uredbe (ES) št. 1321/2004;
Calls on the GNSS Supervisory Authority to invite the expert nominated by the European Parliament in continuous observer status, in accordance with Article 5(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1321/2004;
priznava prihodnjo ureditev javno vodene službe, ki bi lahko dosegla skoraj 30 % dohodka projekta, podobno kot v zeleni knjigi o aplikaciji; Evropski parlament poziva Komisijo, naj dopolni manjkajoče predpise, ki bodo omogočili a na različnih področjih, tako da bodo mala in srednje velika podjetja imela dovolj časa za pripravo na sodelovanje;
Acknowledges the forthcoming regulation of the Public Regulated Service, which would account for approximately 30% of the project income, similarly to the Green Paper on applications; calls on the Commission to complete the missing regulations necessary for enabling applications in various areas, so that SMEs will be given sufficient time to prepare for participation;
poziva Komisijo, ob upoštevanju, da ima projekt značaj Skupnosti, naj zagotovi, da bo Parlament obveščen pred podpisom pogodb o institucionalnem sodelovanju tretjih držav;
Calls on the Commission, considering the Community character of the project, to ensure that Parliament is informed before the signing of any contract of institutional participation by third countries;
poziva Svet, naj zagotovi, da v tem projektu ne bo več prihajalo do zamud;
Calls on the Council to ensure that no further delay in this project occurs;
v skladu s členom 103(2) Poslovnika, ki ga vlagajo:
pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, by
– Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Giuseppe Gargani in Nicole Fontainev imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Giuseppe Gargani and Nicole Fontaine, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Maria Berger in Michel Rocardv imenu skupine PSE
– Maria Berger and Michel Rocard, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Sharon Bowles in Toine Mandersv imenu skupine ALDE
– Sharon Bowles and Toine Manders, on behalf of the ALDE Group
o prihodnji evropski patentni politiki
on future patent policy in Europe
Resolucija Evropskega o prihodnji evropski patentni politiki
European Parliament resolution on future patent policy in Europe
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije o patentih Skupnosti in evropskem patentnem sistemu - spodbujanje inovativnosti s patenti - z dne 24. junija 1997 (KOM(1997)314),
having regard to the Commission's Green Paper of 24 June 1997 on the Community patent and the patent system in Europe - Promoting Innovation through Patents (COM(1997) 314),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 98/44/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. julija 1998 o pravnem varstvu biotehnoloških izumov,
having regard to Directive 98/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 July 1998 on the legal protection of biotechnological inventions,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2005 o patentiranju biotehnoloških izumov,
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2005 on patents for biotechnological inventions,
ob upoštevanju posvetovanja, ki ga je 9. januarja 2006 začel Svet o prihodnji evropski patentni politiki,
having regard to the consultation launched by the Commission on 9 January 2006 on future patent policy in Europe,
ker pomanjkljivosti predlogov patentov Skupnosti verjetno v bližnji prihodnosti ne bodo odpravljene,
whereas the deficiencies of the Community Patent proposals are unlikely to be resolved in the foreseeable future,
ker je smotrn, konkurenčen in stroškovno učinkovit patentni sistem, ki je dostopen vsem, ključna zahteva lizbonske strategije za konkurenčno in na znanju temelječo družbo ter je pomemben za uspeh malih, srednje velikih in tudi velikih podjetij,
whereas an efficient, competitive and cost-effective patent system accessible to all is a key demand of the Lisbon Strategy for a competitive knowledge-based society and crucial for the thriving of small and medium-sized companies as well as large ones,
poziva Komisijo, naj prouči vse možne načine za izboljšanje patentov in patentnih pravdnih sistemov v EU, vključno s sodelovanjem v prihodnjih razpravah o evropskem sporazumu o patentnih pravdnih postopkih (EPLA), pristopom k münchenski konvenciji in pregledom predlogov patentov Skupnosti; glede EPLA pa meni, da bi bilo treba predlagano besedilo izboljšati in oblikovati zadovoljiv predlog za poslovnik sodišča EPLA;
Urges the Commission to explore all possible ways of improving the patent and patent litigation systems in the EU, including participation in further discussions on the European Patent Litigation Agreement (EPLA) and acceding to the Munich Convention as well as revising the Community Patent proposals; as regards the EPLA, considers that the proposed text needs significant improvements and a satisfactory proposal for the Rules of Procedure of the EPLA Court;
zahteva, da pravna služba Parlamenta, ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se EPLA in pravni red Skupnosti prekrivata, pripravi vmesno mnenje o z EU povezanih vidikih morebitne sklenitve EPLA med državami članicami;
Requests that Parliament's Legal Service be asked to provide an interim opinion on EU-related aspects of the possible conclusion of the EPLA by Member States in the light of overlaps between the EPLA and the acquis communautaire and to clarify legislative competences in this field;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0435/2006
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0435/2006
o razmerah v sektorju drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj, namenjenih predelavi
on the situation with regard to soft fruits and cherries intended for processing
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 28. junija 2006 o razmerah v sektorju drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj, namenjenih predelavi (KOM(2006) 345),
having regard to the report of 28 June 2006 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the situation of the sector of soft fruits and cherries intended for processing (COM(2006) 345),
9. , ki predstavljajo podlago skupni ureditvi trga za sadje in zelenjavo,
9. , which form the basis for the CMO in fruit and vegetables,
25. o podrobnih pravilih za uporabo Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2200/1996 glede operativnih skladov, operativnih programov in finančne pomoči,
25. on operational funds and programmes in that sector,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p.
52. o posebnih ukrepih podpore proizvajalcem oreškov,
52. on specific measures in support of nut producers,
ob upoštevanju dokumenta Komisije z naslovom "Širitev EU: posledice v sektorju sadja in zelenjave" (DG AGRI, C-4, april 2004),
having regard to the Commission document entitled 'The enlargement of the EU: implications for the fruit and vegetable sector' (DG AGRI, C-4, April 2004),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 10. avgusta 2004 o poenostavitvi skupne ureditve trga za sadje in zelenjavo (KOM(2004) 0549),
having regard to the report of 10 August 2004 from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the simplification of the common market organisation in fruit and vegetables (COM(2004) 549),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 3. septembra 2004, ki vsebuje analizo skupne ureditve trga za sadje in zelenjavo (SEC(2004) 1120),
having regard to the Commission staff working document of 3 September 2004 providing an analysis of the common market organisation in fruit and vegetables (SEC(2004) 1120),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. maja 2005 o poenostavitvi skupne ureditve trga za sadje in zelenjavo ( P6_TA(2005)0174 ),
having regard to its resolution of 11 May 2005 on the simplification of the common market organisation in fruit and vegetables ( P6_TA(2005)0174 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 28. junija 2006, ki vsebuje pregled sektorja drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj, namenjenih predelavi v EU (SEC(2006) 838),
having regard to the Commission staff working document of 28 June 2006 on a 'Review of the sector of soft fruits and cherries intended for processing in the EU' (SEC(2006) 838),
ker cilji skupne kmetijske politike vključujejo povečanje produktivnosti kmetijstva, zagotavljanje primernega življenjskega standarda kmetijskih skupnosti, stabiliziranje trgov ter zagotavljanje oskrbe in zmernih cen za potrošnike,
whereas the objectives of the common agricultural policy (CAP) include increasing agricultural productivity, ensuring a fair standard of living for the agricultural community, stabilising markets and ensuring the availability of supplies and reasonable prices for consumers,
ker Rimska pogodba predlaga, da se pri izvajanju SKP upošteva posebna narava kmetijske dejavnosti, ki izhaja iz socialne strukture kmetijstva ter strukturnih in naravnih razlik med različnimi kmetijskimi regijami, kakor tudi potreba po postopnem prilagajanju in dejstvo, da je v državah članicah kmetijstvo tesno povezano s celotnim gospodarstvom,
whereas the Treaty establishing the European Community suggests that, in working out the CAP, account should be taken of the particular nature of agricultural activity, which results from the social structure of agriculture and from structural and natural disparities between the various agricultural regions, of the need to effect the appropriate adjustments by degrees, and of the fact that in the Member States agriculture constitutes a sector closely linked with the economy as a whole,
ker so tri temeljna načela SKP enotnost skupnega trga, preferenciali Skupnosti in finančna solidarnost,
whereas the three fundamental CAP principles are: unity of the common market, Community preference and financial solidarity,
ker je po širitvi Evropske unije trg za drobno sadje in češnje doživel pomembne spremembe in se je celotno območje, kjer jih gojijo, povečalo z 69 000 hektarov na 237 000 hektarov,
whereas since the enlargement of the European Union the market for soft fruits and cherries has undergone significant change, with the overall area planted to such fruit increasing from 69 000 hectares to 237 000 hectares,
ker je Poljska v pristopni pogodbi opozorila na težave, ki se lahko pojavijo na trgu EU za sadje in zelenjavo po širitvi, ter na potrebo po izvajanju zaščitnih ukrepov na tem trgu,
whereas in the Accession Treaty Poland drew attention to predicted difficulties on the EU market for fruit and vegetables following the enlargement, and also to the need for protective measures to be applied on that market,
ker je po širitvi Unije leta 2004 drobno sadje postalo proizvod, ki predstavlja gospodarsko mano za Evropsko unijo, saj so nekatere nove države članice med najpomembnejšimi proizvajalci tega sadja v svetu,
whereas following enlargement in 2004 soft fruits have become a highly significant economic product for the EU, particularly in view of the fact that a number of new Member States remain world leaders in the production of these fruits,
ker pred širitvijo leta 2004 določbe prava Skupnosti niso štele drobnega sadja, ne višenj in češenj med občutljive tržne izdelke in niso zato predvidevale posebnih ukrepov v okviru pristojne politike Skupnosti (skupna organizacija trga za področje sadja in zelenjave, carinska politika), in ker se po širitvi določbe Skupnosti niso prilagodile novim značilnostim sektorja drobnega sadja v Skupnosti,
whereas under Community legislation prior to enlargement in 2004, soft fruits and cherries were not treated as highly sensitive market products and as a result no specific measures were included in the relevant Community policies (common organisation of the market in fruit and vegetables, customs policy); whereas since enlargement Community provisions have not been properly adjusted to the new situation prevailing in the Community soft fruits sector,
ker problem drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj najbolj zadeva nove države članice, zlasti Poljsko, ki zagotavlja dve tretjini celotne proizvodnje tega sadja, namenjenega predelavi, v Uniji; ker problem zadeva tudi nekatere regije starih držav članic, kjer ta proizvodnja predstavlja najpomembnejšo kmetijsko dejavnost,
whereas the problem of soft fruits and cherries first and foremost concerns the new Member States, particularly Poland, which accounts for two-thirds of overall EU production of soft fruits and cherries for processing; whereas it also concerns certain regions of the old Member States where such production is a major sector of agriculture,
ker se zaradi zviševanja cen surovin v Skupnosti v sektorju češenj predelovalna industrija vse pogosteje zateka k nadomeščanju proizvodov (višnje namesto češenj) in ker ta težnja povečuje nevarnost pritiska uvoza iz držav izven Skupnosti, kar bi ogrozilo preživetje tradicionalne proizvodnje v nekaterih državah članicah,
whereas because of the rise in the price of Community raw materials in the cherry sector, the processing industries are increasingly resorting to product substitution (sour cherries instead of sweet cherries), a trend which aggravates the threat to the survival of traditional production in certain Member States posed by imports from outside the Community,
ker je pridelovanje drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj skoncentrirano v nekaterih najrevnejših regijah EU, tako da je to vprašanje pomembno ne samo z družbenega, temveč tudi z gospodarskega vidika,
whereas production of soft fruits and cherries is concentrated in a few of the poorest EU regions, which makes it an issue of social, as well as economic, importance,
ker se velik del drobnega sadja ter češenj in višenj pridela na majhnih družinskih posestvih, ki so za svoje preživetje odvisna od njihovega gojenja,
whereas a significant amount of soft fruits and cherries are produced on small family holdings, which are dependent on soft fruit growing for their survival,
ker dolgotrajna kriza na trgu sadja in zelenjave ogroža prihodnost sektorja,
whereas the long-standing crisis in the fruit and vegetable market is threatening the sector's future,
ker so se leta 2004 in 2005 jagode za predelavo in zamrznjene jagode v Evropski uniji znatno pocenile zaradi večje konkurence iz tretjih držav in začasnega povečanja pridelave v Skupnosti,
whereas in 2004 and 2005, the price of strawberries for processing and frozen strawberries in the EU fell considerably, owing to increased competition from third countries and a temporary increase in EU production,
ker je uvoz malin in češenj v EU iz tretjih držav zelo visok in ker se je v zadnjih letih povečal uvoz zamrznjenih jagod; ker se je pri tem na trgu jagod za predelavo povečala konkurenčnost poceni zamrznjenih jagod, uvoženih iz tretjih držav, zlasti iz Kitajske in Maroka,
whereas the significance of imports from third countries into the EU 25 is high for raspberries and sweet cherries and has grown for frozen strawberries over recent years; whereas, in this connection, competition from imports of cheap frozen strawberries from third countries - particularly China and Morocco - has increased on the market for strawberries for processing,
ker ribez gojijo v severnoevropskih državah članicah in ker je Evropska unija njegov vodilni svetovni proizvajalec,
whereas blackcurrants are grown in the northern Member States and whereas the EU is the world's leading producer of such fruit,
ker je po širitvi leta 2004 pridelava ribeza v Uniji narasla z 28 000 ton na 87 000 ton (povprečje v obdobju 2002–2004) z dvema novima pomembnima proizvajalkama – Poljsko (48 000 ton) in Madžarsko (10 000 ton),
whereas since the enlargement in 2004, EU raspberry production has increased from 28 000 tonnes to 87 000 tonnes (averages in 2002–2004), with two new large producers, namely Poland (with 48 000 tonnes) and Hungary (10 000 tonnes),
ker so po širitvi nove države članice (zlasti Poljska s 190 000 tonami v obdobju 2002–2004 in Madžarska z 51 000 tonami) prispevale največji delež k proizvodnji češenj v Uniji,
whereas since the enlargement, new Member States (Poland, with 190 000 tonnes in 2002–2004, and Hungary, with 51 000 tonnes) have accounted for the bulk of EU cherry production,