natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Margrete Auken, Elena Băsescu, Victor Boştinaru, Philippe Boulland, Giles Chichester, Roger Helmer, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Peter Jahr, Lena Kolarska-Bobińska, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Erminia Mazzoni, Willy Meyer, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa, Angelika Werthmann, Rainer Wieland, Tatjana Ždanoka
Margrete Auken, Elena Băsescu, Victor Boştinaru, Philippe Boulland, Giles Chichester, Roger Helmer, Carlos José Iturgaiz Angulo, Peter Jahr, Lena Kolarska-Bobińska, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Erminia Mazzoni, Willy Meyer, Mariya Nedelcheva, Chrysoula Paliadeli, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa, Angelika Werthmann, Rainer Wieland, Tatjana Ždanoka
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 429/73 o posebnih določbah za uvoz v Skupnost nekaterega blaga iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 1059/69 in s poreklom iz Turčije ter Uredbe (ES) št. 215/2000 o obnovitvi ukrepov za leto 2000 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1416/95 o uvedbi nekaterih koncesij za leto 1995 v obliki tarifnih kvot Skupnosti za nekatere predelane kmetijske proizvode
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 making special provisions for imports into the Community of certain goods coming under Regulation (EEC) No 1059/69 and originating in Turkey and Regulation (EC) No 215/2000 renewing for 2000 the measures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1416/95 establishing certain concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas in 1995 for certain processed agricultural products
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0756 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0756 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 207(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7–0004/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 207(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0004/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0250/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0250/2011 ),
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 429/73 o posebnih določbah za uvoz v Skupnost nekaterega blaga iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 1059/69 in s poreklom iz Turčije ter Uredbe (ES) št. 215/2000 o obnovitvi ukrepov za leto 2000 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1416/95 o uvedbi nekaterih koncesij za leto 1995 v obliki tarifnih kvot Skupnosti za nekatere predelane kmetijske proizvode
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 making special provisions for imports into the Community of certain goods coming under Regulation (EEC) No 1059/69 and originating in Turkey and Regulation (EC) No 215/2000 renewing for 2000 the measures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1416/95 establishing certain concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas in 1995 for certain processed agricultural products
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o razveljavitvi Uredbe (EGS) št. 429/73 o posebnih določbah za uvoz v Skupnost nekaterega blaga iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 1059/69 in s poreklom iz Turčije
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council repealing Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 making special provisions for imports into the Community of certain goods coming under Regulation (EEC) No 1059/69 and originating in Turkey
(3) Ker je Sklep št. 1/95 Pridružitvenega sveta ES-Turčija z dne 22. decembra 1995 o izvedbi zaključne faze carinske unije odpravila carinske dajatve za blago s poreklom iz Turčije , je Uredba (EGS) št. 429/73 zastarela.
(3) Since Decision No 1/95 of the EC Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Custom Union eliminated Customs duties for goods originating in Turkey, Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 has become obsolete.
(3) Sklep št. 1/95 Pridružitvenega sveta ES-Turčija z dne 22. decembra 1995 o izvedbi zaključne faze carinske unije opredeljuje pravila za določanje carinskih dajatev za predelane kmetijske proizvode s poreklom iz Turčije, ki se uvozijo v Evropsko unijo.
(3) Decision No 1/95 of the EC Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Custom Union lays down the rules for determining the Customs duties for processed agricultural products originating in Turkey and imported into the European Union.
Zato je Uredba (EGS) št. 429/73 zastarela.
Therefore Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 has become obsolete.
Predlog uredbe
Proposal for a regulation regulation
(4) Uredba (ES) št. 215/2000 z dne 24. januarja 2000 o obnovitvi ukrepov za leto 2000 iz Uredbe (ES) št. 1416/95 o uvedbe nekaterih koncesij za leto 1995 v obliki tarifnih kvot za nekatere predelane kmetijske proizvode je bila začasna, uporabljala se je le leta 2000 in je zato postala brezpredmetna.
(4) Council Regulation (EC) No 215/2000 of 24 January 2000 renewing for 2000 the measures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1416/95 establishing certain concessions in the form of Community tariff quotas in 1995 for certain processed agricultural products had a temporary character, was only applicable in the year 2000 and has exhausted all its effects
(5) Zaradi pravne varnosti in jasnosti je treba uredbi (EGS) št. 429/73 in (ES) št. 215/2000 razveljaviti
(5) For reasons of legal certainty and clarity, Regulations (EEC) No 429/73 and ( EC) No 215/2000 should therefore be repealed,
(4) Zaradi pravne varnosti in jasnosti je treba Uredbo (EGS) št. 429/73 razveljaviti
(4) For reasons of legal certainty and clarity, Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 should therefore be repealed,
Uredbi (EGS) št. 429/73 in (ES) št. 215/2000 se razveljavita .
Regulations (EEC) No 429/73 and ( EC) No 215/2000 are repealed.
Uredba (EGS) št. 429/73 se razveljavi .
Regulation (EEC) No 429/73 is repealed .
Člen 1 – odstavek 2 (novo)
Article 1 - paragraph 2 new
Razveljavitev akta iz odstavka 1 ne posega v:
The repeal of the act referred to in paragraph 1 shall be without prejudice to:
(a) ohranitev veljavnosti aktov Unije, sprejetih na podlagi aktov iz odstavka 1; in
(a) the maintenance in force of Union acts adopted on the basis of the act referred to in paragraph 1; and
(b) nadaljevanje veljavnosti sprememb, sprejetih z aktom iz odstavka 1 k drugim aktom prava Unije, ki jih ta uredba ne razveljavlja.
(b) the continuing validity of amendments made by the act referred to in paragraph 1 to other acts of Union law that are not repealed by this Regulation.
Predlog Komisije za razveljavitev tega pravnega akta, kakor je bil predstavljen Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu v okviru običajnega zakonodajnega postopka, je v znamenju politične zaveze Evropske unije za izboljšanje kakovosti oblikovanja zakonodaje in poenostavitev veljavne zakonodaje z namenom oblikovati boljše in bolj jasno zakonodajno okolje za podjetja.
The Commission’s proposal to repeal this legal acts, as presented to the European Parliament and the Council under the ordinary legislative procedure is driven by the European Union’s policy commitment to improve the quality of law-making, and to simplify the legislation in force in view of creating a better and clearer legislative environment for businesses.
Njene določbe so zastarele, ker je Sklep št. 1/95 Pridružitvenega sveta ES-Turčija z dne 22. decembra 1995 o izvedbi zaključne faze carinske unije odpravil carinske dajatve za blago s poreklom iz Turčije.
Its provisions became obsolete because Decision No 1/95 of the EC Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Custom Union has eliminated Customs duties for goods originating in Turkey.
Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija so se v medinstitucionalnem sporazumu o boljši pripravi zakonodaje dogovorili, da je treba pravo Skupnosti posodobiti in strniti z razveljavitvijo aktov, ki se ne uporabljajo več
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed in their inter-institutional agreement on better law making that Community law should be updated and condensed by repealing acts which are no longer applied.
Akte, ki nimajo več nadaljnjega smotra, je zaradi izboljšanja preglednosti in pravne varnosti Unije treba umakniti iz pravnega reda Skupnosti.
Acts which have no continued relevance should be removed from the 'acquis communautaire ', in order to improve transparency and certainty of Union law.
Poročevalec pozdravlja predlog Komisije, v katerem Komisija jasno navaja, da ni v njeni pristojnosti, da bi akte, ki jih je sprejel Svet ali sta jih sprejela Evropski parlament in Svet, razglasila za zastarele.
The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission's proposal which clearly states that it is not within its powers to declare obsolete acts which were adopted by the Council or the European Parliament and the Council.
Zaradi pravne varnosti razveljavitev pravnih aktov odobri zakonodajalec Unije.
It is in the interest of legal certainty that the repeal of legal acts is authorised by the Union's legislator.
Namen predlaganih predlogov sprememb je vzpostaviti večjo jasnost in pravno varnost za državljane ter institucije Unije.
The proposed amendments are intended to establish more clarity and legal certainty for the Union's citizens and institutions.
Catherine Bearder, George Sabin Cutaş, Mário David, Syed Kamall, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Elisabeth Köstinger, Jörg Leichtfried, Inese Vaidere, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
Catherine Bearder, George Sabin Cutaş, Mário David, Syed Kamall, Maria Eleni Koppa, Elisabeth Köstinger, Jörg Leichtfried, Inese Vaidere, Jarosław Leszek Wałęsa
o boljši zakonodaji, subsidiarnosti, sorazmernosti in pametnih predpisih
on better legislation, subsidiarity and proportionality and smart regulation
MNENJE Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov .........................14
OPINION of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection 14
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................18
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................18
– ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje
– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement on better law-making
UL C 321 E, 31.12.2003, str.
OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 15. decembra 2010 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o državljanski pobudi
– having regard to its position of 15 December 2010 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the citizens’ initiative
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0480 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0480 . ,
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0009 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0009 . ,
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0311 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0311 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. novembra 2010 o 26. letnem poročilu o spremljanju uporabe prava Evropske unije
– having regard to its resolution of 25 November 2010 on the 26th annual report on monitoring the application of European Union Law
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0437 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0437 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. junija 2011 o zagotavljanju neodvisnih ocen učinka
– having regard to its resolution of 8 June 2011 on guaranteeing independent impact assessments
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0259 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0259 . ,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne X. julija 2011 o 27. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava EU
– having regard to its resolution of X July 2011 on the Commission’s 27th report on monitoring the application of EU Law
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0XXX. ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0XXX. ,
– ob upoštevanju političnih smernic za novo Komisijo, ki jih je 3. septembra 2009 predstavil predsednik Komisije,
– having regard to the ‘Political guidelines for the next Commission’ of 3 September 2009 by the President of the Commission,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o pametni pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2010)0543 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission on Smart Regulation in the European Union ( COM(2010)0543 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti (Sedemnajsto poročilo o boljši pripravi zakonodaje, 2009) ( KOM(2010)0547 ),
– having regard to the report from the Commission on subsidiarity and proportionality (17th report on Better Lawmaking covering the year 2009) ( COM(2010)0547 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Tretji strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji“ ( KOM(2009)0015 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Third Strategic Review of Better Regulation in the European Union’ ( COM(2009)0015 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom „Zmanjševanje administrativnih bremen v Evropski uniji – Priloga k 3. strateškemu pregledu boljše zakonodaje“ ( KOM(2009)0016 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union’ – 2008 progress report and 2009 outlook’ ( COM(2009)0016 ),
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z naslovom „Tretje poročilo o napredku strategije za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja“ ( KOM(2009)0017 ),
– having regard to the Commission working document entitled ‘Third progress report on the strategy for simplifying the regulatory environment’ ( COM(2009)0017 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Akcijski program za zmanjševanje upravnih obremenitev v Evropski uniji – Načrti za posamezna področja in ukrepi za leto 2009“ ( KOM(2009)0544 ),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission entitled ‘Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the EU – Sectoral Reduction Plans and 2009 Actions’ ( COM(2009)0544 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila skupine na visoki ravni neodvisnih zainteresiranih strani za upravna bremena z dne 17. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the report of 17 September 2009 of the High-Level Group of Independent Stakeholders on Administrative Burdens,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta EU za konkurenčnost z dne 30. maja 2011 o pametni pravni ureditvi,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 30 May 2011 on Smart Regulation,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov in Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0251/2011 ),
– having regard to the report by the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0251/2011 ),
A. ker je bil načrt za pametno pravno ureditev pripravljen v okviru strategije EU 2020, katere cilj je, da se do leta 2020 doseže „pametna, trajnostna in vključujoča rast“, prvenstveno tako, da bi se ob bolj kakovostni in poenostavljeni veljavni zakonodaji EU zmanjšala upravna bremena za podjetja,
A. whereas the smart regulation agenda was introduced as part of the EU2020 Strategy, which aims at achieving ‘smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’ by the year 2020, primarily through the reduction of administrative burdens for business by ensuring the improved quality and simplification of existing EU legislation,
B. ker je pravilno izvajanje načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti izredno pomembno za ustrezno delovanje Evropske unije in za to, da bodo njene institucije delovale v skladu s pričakovanji državljanov, podjetij na notranjem trgu ter nacionalnih in lokalnih vlad, pa tudi za to, da se odločitve sprejemajo kar najbliže državljanom,
B. whereas correct application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality is extremely important for the proper functioning of the European Union and to enable its institutions’ activities to meet the expectations of its citizens, companies operating in the internal market and national and local government, and to ensure that decisions are taken as closely as possible to the citizen,
C. ker je treba vprašanje boljše priprave zakonodaje obravnavati ne le v okviru zakonodajnega programa Komisije, ampak tudi širše glede na stalno izvajanje novih prvin Lizbonske pogodbe, ki vplivajo na zakonodajne postopke,
C. whereas the issue of smart regulation should be considered not only in the context of the Commission’s legislative programme, but also in a wider sense, in connection with the continued implementation of the new features of the Lisbon Treaty that affect legislative procedures,
D. ker Lizbonska pogodba na novo ureja razmerje moči med evropskimi institucijami in Parlament v procesu sprejemanja zakonodaje po rednem zakonodajnem postopku obravnava kot enakovreden Svetu,
D. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has sought to redress the balance of powers between the European institutions, and considers Parliament to be equal with the Council in lawmaking under the ordinary legislative procedure,
E. ker so nacionalni parlamenti po sprejetju Lizbonske pogodbe formalno vključeni v nadzor uporabe načela subsidiarnosti in so do zdaj poslali že več kot 300 prispevkov;
E. whereas, following the adoption of the Lisbon Treaty, national parliaments are now formally involved in monitoring the application of the principle of subsidiarity, with over 300 submissions received so far,
F. ker je bistvenega pomena, da se pri pripravi zakonodajnih aktov, vključno z ocenami učinka, opravijo posvetovanja z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti z malimi in srednjimi podjetji in ustreznimi interesnimi skupinami,
F. whereas consultations with all interested parties, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and other relevant stakeholders, are of fundamental importance in the preparation of draft legislation, including impact assessments,
G. ker se od leta 2005 izvaja poseben program za zmanjševanje upravnih bremen, izhajajočih iz zakonodaje Evropske unije, s ciljem zmanjšati bremena za 25 % do leta 2012, kar bi ustrezalo 1,4 % povečanju bruto domačega proizvoda,
G. whereas a programme aimed at reducing the administrative burdens arising from European Union legislation has been in place since 2005 and seeks to reduce those burdens by 25 % by 2012, which would be equivalent to a 1.4 % increase in the level of GDP,
H. ker je glede na letno poročilo odbora za oceno učinka za leto 2010 Komisija celovito izmerila le 27 % ocen učinka, opravljenih tega leta;
H. whereas, according to the 2010 Impact Assessment Board (IAB) Annual Report, the Commission comprehensively quantified only 27 % of the impact assessments undertaken in that year,
I. ker je Komisija predlagala ukrepe za zmanjšanje upravnih bremen, s katerimi bi bil zastavljeni cilj celo presežen, a morata Parlament in Svet prej še sprejeti predhodne ukrepe, ki ustrezajo približno četrtini cilja 25-odstotnega zmanjšanja;
I. whereas although the Commission has proposed measures to reduce administrative burdens exceeding the target figure, the Parliament and the Council have yet to adopt prior measures accounting for around a quarter of the 25 % target;
J. ker je eden od ključnih elementov programa referenčno merjenje upravnih stroškov, osnovano na metodi standardnih stroškov,
J. whereas one of the key elements of the programme is the baseline measurement of administrative costs based on a standard cost model,
K. ker uporaba tehnike prenovitve in kodifikacije za poenostavitev in kodifikacijo veljavne zakonodaje zagotavlja večjo jasnost in skladnost vnesenih sprememb,
K. whereas the use of recasting and codification to simplify and codify existing legislation ensures greater clarity and consistency as regards the changes made,
L. ker je bistvenega pomena, da države članice pravilno in pravočasno izvajajo direktive Evropske unije pa tudi, da obravnavajo še vedno nerešen problem prestrogih predpisov ( angl . „gold-plating“ ), ki uvajajo obveznosti, ki presegajo zahteve evropske zakonodaje,
L. whereas correct and timely implementation by Member States is of crucial importance as regards European Union directives, as is the ongoing problem of ‘gold-plating’ legislation, i.e. the inclusion of obligations going beyond the requirements of European law,
M. ker razlike pri izvajanju pomenijo velik izziv za učinkovito in uspešno delovanje enotnega trga, kar povzroča, da se države članice delijo na troje: na tiste, ki evropsko zakonodajo izvajajo nepravilno, na tiste, ki jo izvajajo nepopolno, in na take, ki jo izvajajo netočno, to pa evropska podjetja in potrošnike potiska v neenak položaj in zavira nadaljnjo rast;
M. whereas divergences due to differing implementation pose great challenges to the efficient and effective functioning of the Single Market, with the resulting three-tiered group of Member States, comprising those with incorrect implementation, incomplete implementation or inaccurate implementation, disadvantaging European businesses and consumers at the cost of further growth,
N. ker je bil z zakonom za mala podjetja uveden test MSP, ki pa je bil do zdaj uporabljen v zelo maloštevilnih primerih,
N. whereas the SME Test was introduced in the Small Business Act, but has only been applied in a minority of possible cases so far,
O. ker je podpredsednik Komisije Maroš Šefčovič na izmenjavi mnenj na seji Odbora za pravne zadeve 27. januarja 2011 izrazil trdno zavezanost načrtu za pametno pravno ureditev,
O. whereas the Vice-President of the Commission, Mr Maroš Šefčovič, expressed a strong commitment to the smart regulation agenda at the exchange of views held at the meeting of the Committee on Legal Affairs on 27 January 2011,
P. ker Lizbonska pogodba za delegirane in izvedbene akte iz členov 290 in 291 PDEU določa nov sistem, po katerem so delegirani akti predmet skupnega dogovora, izvedbeni akti pa uredbe,
P. whereas the new system under the Lisbon Treaty of delegated and implementing acts, in Articles 290 and 291 TFEU, is now subject to a common understanding and a regulation respectively,
2. poudarja, da morajo evropske institucije pri oblikovanju predlogov spoštovati načeli subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti ter upoštevati merila iz Protokola št. 2, priloženega PDEU;
Emphasises that European institutions must respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality when formulating proposals and observe the criteria laid down in Protocol No 2 annexed to the TFEU;
5. ob sklicevanju na Montijevo poročilo odločno poudarja, da bi se bilo treba pri zakonodajnih predlogih v večji meri zatekati k uredbam, da bi sprejemali manj zakonodaje, ki pa bi bila boljša;
Stresses that, pursuing the same approach as was adopted in the Monti report, greater use should be made of regulations in legislative proposals, as part of the move towards less and better legislation;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj se obveže glede rokov, v katerih bo izpolnila zahteve Parlamenta v skladu s členom 225 PDEU; pri tem se še posebej sklicuje na zavezo iz okvirnega sporazuma, da mora Komisija v treh mesecih po sprejetju poročila o zakonodajni pobudi na plenarnem zasedanju pripraviti poročilo o konkretnem izvajanju zahtev in najpozneje v enem letu predložiti zakonodajni predlog;
Calls on the Commission to give an undertaking regarding the deadlines by which it will meet requests made by Parliament pursuant to Article 225 TFEU, with specific reference to the commitment under the Framework Agreement to draw up a report on the concrete follow-up of any request within the three months following the adoption of a legislative initiative report in plenary and to submit a legislative proposal at the latest after one year;
Nacionalni parlamenti
National parliaments