natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se katero koli dohodninsko leto, ki se začne 6. aprila 1975 ali pozneje, ne šteje kot leto za upravičenost dajatve v smislu zakonodaje Združenega kraljestva za namene člena 52(1)(b)(i), se zavarovalne dobe, dobe zaposlitve ali dobe prebivanja, dopolnjene v tem letu, ne upoštevajo.
any income tax year starting on or after 6 April 1975 does not count as a qualifying year within the meaning of United Kingdom legislation for the purposes of Article 52(1)(b)(i), any periods of insurance, employment or residence completed in that year shall be disregarded.
Za pretvorbo faktorja zaslužka v zavarovalne dobe se faktor zaslužka, dosežen v ustreznem dohodninskem letu v smislu zakonodaje Združenega kraljestva, deli s spodnjo mejo zaslužka za navedeno leto.
For the purpose of converting an earnings factor into periods of insurance, the earnings factor achieved in the relevant income tax year within the meaning of United Kingdom legislation shall be divided by that year's lower earnings limit.
Rezultat je izražen kot celo število, preostanek se zanemari.
The result shall be expressed as a whole number, any remaining fraction being ignored.
Tako izračunano število se obravnava, kot da predstavlja število tednov zavarovanja, dopolnjenih po zakonodaji Združenega kraljestva v navedenem letu, pod pogojem, da takšno število ne presega števila tednov, v času katerih je v navedenem letu za osebo veljala navedena zakonodaja.
The figure so calculated shall be treated as representing the number of weeks of insurance completed under United Kingdom legislation during that year provided that such figure shall not exceed the number of weeks during which in that year the person was subject to that legislation.".
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. julija 2008 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o razširitvi določb Uredbe (ES) št. 883/2004 in Uredbe (ES) št. [...] na državljane tretjih držav, za katere navedene določbe ne veljajo le na podlagi njihovega državljanstva ( KOM(2007)0439 – C6-0289/2007 – 2007/0152(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 9 July 2008 on the proposal for a Council regulation extending the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 and Regulation (EC) No […] to nationals of third countries who are not already covered by these provisions solely on the ground of their nationality ( COM(2007)0439 – C6-0289/2007 – 2007/0152(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2007)0439 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2007)0439 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 63(4) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 63(4) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 67 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0289/2007 ),
having regard to Article 67 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0289/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ( A6-0209/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs ( A6-0209/2008 ),
Ta uredba spoštuje temeljne pravice in upošteva načela, priznana zlasti v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, še zlasti v členu 34(2) Listine
This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised, in particular, by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Article 34(2) thereof
Cilji Evropske unije so spodbujanje visoke ravni socialne zaščite ter zvišanje življenjskega standarda in izboljšanje kakovosti življenja v državah članicah.
Promoting a high level of social protection and raising the standard of living and the quality of life in the Member States are objectives of the European Union.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. julija 2008 o spremembi člena 29 Poslovnika Parlamenta – oblikovanje političnih skupin ( 2006/2201(REG) )
European Parliament decision of 9 July 2008 on amendment of Rule 29 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure - Formation of political groups ( 2006/2201(REG) )
ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe svojega Poslovnika ( B6-0420/2006 ),
having regard to the proposal for amendment of its Rules of Procedure ( B6-0420/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A6-0206/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A6-0206/2008 ),
je sklenil, da bo predlog spremembe začel veljati prvi dan naslednjega delnega zasedanja po evropskih volitvah leta 2009;
Decides that the amendment will enter into force on the first day of the first part-session following the European elections in the year 2009;
Člen 29 – odstavek 2
Rule 29 – paragraph 2
Politično skupino sestavljajo poslanci, izvoljeni v najmanj
A political group shall comprise Members elected in at least
držav članic.
of the Member States.
Najmanjše število poslancev, potrebno za oblikovanje politične skupine, je
The minimum number of Members required to form a political group shall be
Člen 29 − odstavek 2 a (novo)
Rule 29 − paragraph 2 a (new)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu ( 2007/2027(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system ( 2007/2027(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 61 Pogodbe ES, ki zagotavlja postopno vzpostavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, vključno z ukrepi na področju sodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah,
having regard to Article 61 of the EC Treaty, which provides for the progressive establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice including measures in the field of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters,
ob upoštevanju Haaškega programa za krepitev svobode, varnosti in pravice v Evropski uniji UL C 53, 3.3.2005, str.
having regard to the Hague Programme for strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union OJ C 53, 3.3.2005, p.
, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet v Bruslju 5. novembra 2004, in sporočila Komisije z dne 10. maja 2005 z naslovom "Haaški program: Deset prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let" ( KOM(2005)0184 ),
, adopted by the Brussels European Council on 5 November 2004, and to the Commission's communication of 10 May 2005 on "The Hague Programme: Ten priorities for the next five years" ( COM(2005)0184 ),
ob upoštevanju poziva z dne 14. in 15. decembra 2001 na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Laeknu za evropsko mrežo za spodbujanje hitre uvedbe usposabljanja za sodstvo, da se pomaga razviti zaupanje med vpletenimi v sodno sodelovanje,
having regard to the call, made on 14-15 December 2001 by the Laeken European Council, for the rapid setting-up of a European network to encourage training for the judiciary, with a view to helping to develop trust between those involved in judicial cooperation,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 10. septembra 1991 o financiranju Akademije za evropsko pravo za Evropsko skupnost UL C 267, 14.10.1991, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 10 September 1991 on the establishment of a European Law Academy OJ C 267, 14.10.1991, p.
in z dne 24. septembra 2002 o evropski mreži za usposabljanje pravosodja UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
and of 24 September 2002 on the European Judicial Training Network OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije z dne 29. junija 2006 o usposabljanju na področju pravosodja v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0356 ), z dne 5. septembra 2007 o Evropi rezultatov: uporaba prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2007)0502 ) in z dne 4. februarja 2008 o ustanovitvi foruma za razpravo o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja ( KOM(2008)0038 ),
having regard to the Commission's communications of 29 June 2006 on judicial training in the European Union ( COM(2006)0356 ), of 5 September 2007 on a Europe of results: applying Community law ( COM(2007)0502 ), and of 4 February 2008 on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice ( COM(2008)0038 ),
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/79/ES, Euratom, z dne 20. decembra 2007 o spremembi Protokola o statutu Sodišča UL L 24, 29.1.2008, str.
having regard to Council Decision 2008/79/EC, Euratom of 20 December 2007 amending the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p.
in naslednjih sprememb Poslovnika Sodišča, ki uvajajo obvezen postopek predhodnega odločanja,
, and the consequent modifications of the Court of Justice's Rules of Procedure introducing an urgent preliminary ruling procedure,
ob upoštevanju členov 81(2)(h) in 82(1)(c) prihodnje pogodbe o delovanju Unije, kot jo uvaja Lizbonska pogodba, ki bi zagotovila pravno podlago za ukrepe, namenjene podpori za usposabljanje pravosodja in sodnega osebja,
having regard to Articles 81(2)(h) and 82(1)(c) of the future Treaty on the Functioning of the Union, as inserted by the Treaty of Lisbon, which would provide a legal basis for measures aimed at providing support for the training of the judiciary and judicial staff,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0224/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0224/2008 ),
ker je raziskava, ki je bila za namene te resolucije opravljena v drugi polovici leta 2007, poudarila:
whereas a survey carried out for the purposes of this resolution during the second half of 2007 highlighted:
velike razlike med nacionalnimi sodniki glede poznavanja prava Skupnosti Za namene te resolucije se pri sklicevanjih na pravo Skupnosti razume, kot da vključuje tudi pravo Unije.
significant disparities in national judges' knowledge of Community law For the purposes of this resolution, references to Community law should be understood as also including Union law.
v Evropski uniji, pri čemer je to včasih zelo omejeno,
across the European Union, with awareness of it being sometimes very limited,
nujnost izboljšanja splošnega znanja tujih jezikov pri nacionalnih sodnikih,
the urgent need to enhance the overall foreign language skills of national judges,
težave nacionalnih sodnikov, s katerimi se srečujejo pri dostopanju do specifičnih in posodobljenih informacij o zakonodaji Skupnosti,
the difficulties experienced by national judges in accessing specific and up-to-date information on Community law,
potrebo po izboljšanju ter krepitvi začetnega in vseživljenjskega usposabljanja nacionalnih sodnikov o zakonodaji Skupnosti,
the need to improve and intensify the initial and life-long training of national judges in Community law,
sorazmerno pomanjkanje znanja sodnikov o postopku predhodnega odločanja ter potrebo po krepitvi dialoga med nacionalnimi sodniki in Sodiščem,
the judges' relative lack of familiarity with the preliminary ruling procedure, and the need to reinforce the dialogue between national judges and the Court of Justice,
dejstvo, da številni sodniki zakonodajo Skupnosti obravnavajo kot preveč zapleteno in nerazumljivo,
the fact that Community law is perceived by many judges as excessively complex and opaque,
potrebo po zagotavljanju, da je zakonodaja Skupnosti primernejša za uporabo nacionalnih sodnikov,
the need to ensure that Community law lends itself better to application by national judges,
ker so za usposabljanje sodstva, vključno z njegovo evropsko razsežnostjo, še vedno odgovorne države članice; ker zgoraj navedeni Haaški program vsebuje izjavo Evropskega sveta, da naj se "prispevek EU sistematsko vključi v usposabljanje pravosodnih organov" UL C 53, 3.3.2005, str.
whereas the primary responsibility for judicial training, including its European dimension, rests with the Member States; whereas the above-mentioned Hague programme contains a statement by the European Council that "an EU component should be systematically included in the training of judicial authorities" OJ C 53, 3.3.2005, p.
, in ker je usposabljanje sodstva v vsaki državi članici kljub vsemu skupno področje za institucije EU in vse države članice,
, and whereas the training of the judiciary in each Member State is nevertheless a matter of common concern for the EU institutions and every Member State,
ker se zakonodaje Skupnosti ne sme obravnavati kot področja, ki je rezervirano za elitni organ strokovnjakov, in ker priložnosti za usposabljanje na tem področju ne smejo biti omejene na sodnike višjih sodišč, temveč enakomerno razširjene za sodnike na vseh ravneh sodnega sistema,
whereas Community law must not be perceived as an area reserved for an elite body of specialists, and whereas training opportunities in this area must not be confined to judges of the higher courts, but rather extended equally to judges at all levels of the judicial system,
ker so nekateri organi, ki jih finančno podpira Skupnost, vse uspešnejši ter že usposabljajo večje število sodnikov in državnih tožilcev,
whereas certain bodies supported financially by the Community are increasingly successful, and already train judges and state prosecutors in large numbers,
ker je znanje tujih jezikov bistveno za zagotovitev ustreznega sodnega sodelovanja, zlasti v civilnih in komercialnih zadevah, na področjih, na katerih je poskrbljeno za neposreden stik med sodniki, in za zagotovitev dostopa do programov izmenjave za sodnike,
whereas knowledge of foreign languages is crucial in ensuring proper judicial cooperation, in particular in civil and commercial matters, in areas where direct contact between judges is provided for, and in ensuring access to exchange programmes for judges,
ker zdaj postopek predhodnega odločanja stalnemu prizadevanju Sodišča navkljub povprečno traja zelo dolgo in močno zmanjšuje privlačnost za nacionalne sodnike,
whereas the current average duration of the preliminary ruling procedure, despite constant efforts on the part of the Court of Justice, remains excessively long and considerably reduces the attractiveness of this procedure for national judges,
ker je Sodišče menilo, da morajo države članice oblikovati sistem pravnih sredstev in postopkov, ki zagotavljajo spoštovanje pravice do učinkovitega sodnega varstva pravic, ki izhajajo iz prava Skupnosti Zadeva C-50/00 P
whereas the Court of Justice has held that it is for the Member States to establish a system of legal remedies and procedures which ensure respect for the right to effective judicial protection of rights derived from Community law Case C-50/00 P
[2002] ECR I-6677, odstavek 41.
[2002] ECR I-6677, at paragraph 41.
ker se nič iz te resolucije ne sme obravnavati kot element, ki vpliva na neodvisnost sodnikov in nacionalnih pravnih sistemov v skladu s priporočilom št.
whereas nothing in this resolution should be taken as affecting the independence of judges and of the national legal systems, in accordance with Recommendation No.
Nacionalni sodnik kot prvi sodnik zakonodaje Skupnosti
The national judge as first judge of Community law
ugotavlja, da Evropska skupnost temelji na načelu pravne države Zadeva 294/83
Notes that the European Community is a community based on the rule of law Case 294/83 "
[1986] ECR 1339, odstavek 23.
[1986] ECR 1339, at paragraph 23.
; ugotavlja, da zakonodaja Skupnosti ostaja mrtva črka na papirju, če je države članice ne uporabljajo pravilno, vključno z nacionalnimi sodniki, ki so zato osnova sodnega sistema Evropske unije in ki imajo osrednjo in nepogrešljivo vlogo pri ustanavljanju enotnega evropskega pravnega reda, nenazadnje glede na nedavne dosežke zakonodajalcev Skupnosti Glej na primer Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003 z dne 16. decembra 2002 o izvajanju pravil konkurence iz členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe (UL L 1, 4.1.2003, str.
; notes that Community law remains a dead letter if it is not properly applied in the Member States, including by national judges, who are therefore the keystone of the European Union judicial system and who play a central and indispensable role in the establishment of a single European legal order, not least in the light of the recent achievements by the Community legislature See for example Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p.
, da se jih bolj dejavno vključi v izvajanje prava Skupnosti in se jim dodeli večja odgovornost;
to involve them more actively in, and accord them greater responsibility for, the implementation of Community law;
pozdravlja priznanje Komisije, da imajo nacionalni sodniki ključno vlogo pri zagotavljanju spoštovanja zakonodaje Skupnosti, na primer prek načel primarnosti zakonodaje Skupnosti, neposrednega učinka, usklajenosti razlage in odgovornosti države za kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj si poleg že obstoječih sektorskih pobud še naprej prizadeva za to; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, da nemudoma nadaljuje z objavo obvestila o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitev zakonodaje Skupnosti s strani nacionalnih organov;
Welcomes the Commission's acknowledgment that national judges play an essential role in ensuring respect for Community law, for example through the principles of the primacy of Community law, direct effect, consistency of interpretation and state liability for breaches of Community law; calls on the Commission to pursue its efforts in this direction in addition to sectoral initiatives already in place; furthermore, calls on the Commission to proceed without delay with the publication of an information note on actions for damages for breaches of Community law by national authorities;
opozarja, da je uporaba prava Skupnosti velik izziv za nacionalne sodnike, zlasti za tiste v državah članicah, ki so se Evropski uniji pridružile maja 2004 in pozneje, zaradi česar je bilo treba okrepiti ukrepe za spodbujanje poklicnega usposabljanja za sodnike v teh državah članicah;
Notes that the application of Community law by national judges is a complex challenge for national judges, particularly for those in the Member States which joined the European Union in May 2004 and subsequently, making it necessary to step up measures to promote professional training for judges in those Member States;
poleg tega meni, da je z uzakonitvijo vrste predpisov, ki vsebujejo kolizijska pravila, zakonodajno telo Skupnosti sprejelo politično odločitev, ki vključuje verjetno uporabo tuje zakonodaje pri nacionalnih sodnikih, po možnosti vključuje tudi uporabo primerjalnega pristopa; meni, da so ti elementi skupaj še dodaten razlog za obširnejše poučevanja tujega jezika;
Is, moreover, of the opinion that, by enacting a series of regulations containing conflict-of-law rules, the Community legislature has made a policy choice which involves the likely application of foreign law by national judges, possibly also entailing the use of a comparative approach; considers that these elements, taken together, further strengthen the case for increasing foreign language training;
meni, da je v javnem interesu izboljšati jezikovne sposobnosti sodstva v državah članicah; zato poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bo takšno usposabljanje brezplačno in lahko dostopno, ter naj preučijo možnost, da bi se sodniki lahko učili tujega jezika v državi članici, v kateri se govori, na primer v povezavi s sodelovanjem pri izmenjavi sodnikov;
Considers that it is in the public interest to enhance the language skills of the judiciary in the Member States; calls on the Member States, therefore, to ensure that such training is free of charge and easily accessible, and to explore the possibility of judges being able to study a foreign language in a Member State where it is spoken, for example in conjunction with participation in a judicial exchange;
meni, da je dostop do strokovne literature v maternem jeziku sodnika pomemben za boljše razumevanje zakonodaje Skupnosti, ter ugotavlja očitno pomanjkanje strokovne literature o zakonodaji Skupnosti v nekaterih uradnih jezikih EU, na primer v zvezi z vprašanji mednarodnega zasebnega prava, in možne resne posledice, ki jih ima to za pripravo skupnega pravnega reda, ki izraža raznolikost zakonodajnih tradicij; zato poziva Komisijo, naj podpre pripravo takšne literature, zlasti v uradnih jezikih z manj govorci;
Considers access to academic literature in the judge's mother tongue to be important for a better understanding of Community law, and notes the apparent scarcity of specialised literature on Community law in certain official languages of the EU, for example concerning private international law issues, and the grave potential consequences this has for the construction of a common legal order reflecting a diversity of legal traditions; therefore calls on the Commission to support the development of such literature, particularly in the less-spoken official languages;
ugotavlja, da popolne in posodobljene informacije o zakonodaji Skupnosti številnim sodnikom niso na voljo v sistematični in ustrezni obliki ter da je zakonodaja Skupnosti včasih slabo zastopana v domačih uradnih listih, zakonikih, pripombah, strokovnih revijah in učbenikih ter temelji na prevodih različne kakovosti; poziva države članice, naj obnovijo prizadevanje na tem področju;
Notes that complete and up-to-date information on Community law is not available in a systematic and proper manner to many national judges, and that Community law is sometimes poorly represented in domestic official journals, codes, commentaries, periodicals and textbooks and based on translations of uneven quality; calls on the Member States to renew efforts in this area;
meni, da dejanski evropski pravosodni prostor, v katerem lahko poteka učinkovito sodno sodelovanje, zahteva ne le poznavanje evropske zakonodaje, ampak tudi vzajemno splošno poznavanje pravnih sistemov drugih držav članic; poudarja neskladnost pri obravnavi tuje zakonodaje v Evropski uniji in meni, da je treba to pomembno vprašanje obravnavati v prihodnosti; v zvezi s tem upošteva napovedano horizontalno študijo Komisije o obravnavi tuje zakonodaje v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah ter potekajoče študije v okviru haaške konference o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu;
Is of the opinion that a true European judicial area in which effective judicial cooperation can take place requires not only knowledge of European law, but also mutual general knowledge of the legal systems of the other Member States; highlights the inconsistencies in the treatment of foreign law throughout the European Union and considers that this important issue should be addressed in the future; takes note in that respect of the Commission's forthcoming horizontal study on the treatment of foreign law in civil and commercial matters, and of the ongoing studies within the framework of the Hague Conference on Private International Law;
pozdravlja namen Komisije, da podpre izboljšano razpoložljivost nacionalnih zbirk podatkov o odločitvah nacionalnega sodišča v zvezi z zakonodajo Skupnosti; meni, da morajo biti te zbirke podatkov čim bolj popolne in uporabniku prijazne; poleg tega meni, da bi bile konvencije ter Uredba o pristojnosti in izvrševanju sodb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah pomembne za evropsko zbirko podatkov, ker jih državni sodniki pogosto uporabljajo;
Welcomes the Commission's intention to support the improved availability of national databases on national court rulings concerning Community law; considers that these databases should be as complete and user-friendly as possible; considers, moreover, that the Conventions and Regulation on jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters would be a case in point for a European database, given their frequent use by national judges;
11. meni, da morajo imeti nacionalni sodniki dostop do zbirk podatkov, ki vsebujejo tekoče predloge za sprejetje predhodnih odločb iz vseh držav članic; meni, da je prav tako koristno, da se sodbe predložitvenih sodišč, ki uporabljajo predhodno odločanje, nadalje objavljajo, kot že omenja obvestilo Sodišča o sklicih z nacionalnih sodišč za predhodno odločanje UL C 143, 11.6.2005, str.
11.Is of the opinion that all national judges should have access to databases containing pending references for preliminary rulings from all Member States; considers it equally useful for judgments of referring courts applying a preliminary ruling to be further publicised, as is already touched upon in the Court of Justice's information note on references from national courts for a preliminary ruling OJ C 143, 11.6.2005, p.
1, odstavek 31.
1, at paragraph 31.