natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da mora vlagatelj za izpolnitev zahteve, da morajo biti izčrpani vsi notranji pravni ukrepi iz člena 35 EKČP, izčrpati pravna sredstva zadevne države, pa tudi uporabiti postopek sprejetja predhodne odločbe pred sodiščem v Luksemburgu; ta postopek velja za izpeljanega tudi takrat, ko nacionalno sodišče po zahtevi pritožnika za vložitev predloga za predhodno odločbo presodi, da zahteva ni upravičena;
Considers that for the purposes of complying with the requirement set out in Article 35 ECHR for domestic remedies to have been exhausted, the applicant shall have exhausted the judicial remedies of the State concerned including a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court in Luxembourg; the latter procedure shall be regarded as having been complied with where following a request to that end by the applicant the national court does not consider it appropriate for a reference for a preliminary ruling to be made;
ugotavlja, da se po pristopu EU k EKČP lahko zgodi, da bosta za določene zadeve pristojni obe sodišči, Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice in Sodišče Evropske unije, ter poudarja, da se ni dopustno, da bi se takšna zadeva hkrati predložila obema sodiščema;
Notes that, following the EU's accession to the ECHR, it might occur that both the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union have jurisdiction in certain cases, and points out that simultaneous referrals to the two Courts will not be admissible;
meni, da je v interesu dobrega upravljanja in pravičnosti ustrezno, da brez poseganja v člen 36(2) EKČP, Unija lahko nastopi kot sotožena stranka v vsaki zadevi pred Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice, kjer se lahko pojavi vprašanje glede prava Unije in kjer je tožena stran država članica, v vsaki tožbi proti Uniji pa lahko pod enakimi pogoji kot sotožena stranka nastopi država članica; ta možnost mora biti opredeljena z določbami, vključenimi v pogodbo o pristopu, in sicer jasno, vendar dovolj široko;
Considers it appropriate that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice and without prejudice to Article 36(2) of the ECHR, in any case brought against a Member State before the European Court of Human Rights which may raise an issue concerning the law of the Union, the Union may be permitted to intervene as a co-defendant, and that in any case brought against the Union subject to the same conditions any Member State may be permitted to intervene as a co-defendant; this possibility must be defined in the provisions of the accession treaty in a manner which is both clear and sufficiently broad;
ocenjuje, da sprejetje statusa sotožene stranke ne preprečuje drugih posrednih možnosti, ki jih ponuja EKČP (člen 36, I), kot je na primer pravica Unije, da v vsaki pritožbi državljana Unije nastopi kot tretja stranka;
Considers that the adoption of the institution of co-defendant does not impede other indirect options provided by the ECHR (Article 36, I), such as the right of the Union to intervene as a third party in any application by an EU citizen;
meni, da si mora Evropska unija glede na dejstvo, da je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice potrdilo eksteritorialno veljavnost EKČP, prizadevati za popolno spoštovanje te obveznosti pri svojih zunanjih odnosih in dejavnostih;
Considers that, as the European Court of Human Rights has acknowledged the extra-territorial applicability of the ECHR, the Union must aim to respect this obligation fully in its external relations and activities;
meni, da odnosov med Sodiščem Evropske unije in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice ne bi bilo pametno formalizirati z uvedbo postopka predhodnega odločanja pred Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice ali z vzpostavitvijo organa ali odbora, ki bi sprejel odločitev takrat, kadar bi eno izmed dveh sodišče nameravalo sprejeti razlago EKČP, ki bi se razlikovala od razlage drugega; v zvezi s tem izpostavlja izjavo št. 2 o členu 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki ugotavlja obstoj rednega dialoga med Sodiščem Evropske unije in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice, ki bi ga bilo treba okrepiti s pristopom Unije k EKČP;
Considers that it would be unwise to formalise relations between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights by establishing a preliminary ruling procedure before the latter or by creating a body or panel which would take decisions when one of the two courts intended to adopt an interpretation of the ECHR which differed from that adopted by the other; recalls in this context Declaration No 2 concerning Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, which notes the existence of a regular dialogue between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, which should be reinforced when the Union accedes to the ECHR;
se jasno zaveda dejstva, da lahko Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice ugotovi kršitev v zadevi, o kateri je Sodišče Evropske unije že odločilo, in poudarja, da to nikakor ne bo zbudilo dvomov v verodostojnosti Sodišča Evropske unije kot najvišjega razsodnika v pravosodnem sistemu EU;
Is clearly aware of the fact that the European Court of Human Rights may find a violation in a case that has already been decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union and stresses that this would in no way cast a doubt on the credibility of the Court of Justice of the European Union as an ultimate umpire in the EU judicial system;
poudarja, da bo po pristopu k EKČP ta predstavljala minimalni standard varstva človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin v Evropi in da bo obvezno veljala zlasti v primerih, v katerih bo varstvo, ki ga zagotavlja Evropska unije, slabše od varstva, ki ga določa EKČP; poudarja, da je EKČP okrepila varstvo pravic, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah in področje njene uporabe, in da Listina priznava tudi druge pravice in načela, ki jih EKČP ne vsebuje, vendar pa jih vsebujejo njeni dodatni protokoli in z njo povezanimi instrumenti;
Stresses that, following the accession, the ECHR will constitute the minimum standard of protection for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe and will be crucial, in particular, in cases where the protection granted by the EU is inferior to that provided under the ECHR; points out that the ECHR reinforces protection of the rights recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights that come within its scope and that the Charter also recognises other rights and principles, which are not contained in the ECHR, but in the additional protocols and in instruments related to the ECHR;
opozarja, da je spodbujanje spoštovanja človekovih pravic, ki je kot temeljno načelo EU vključeno v ustanovno pogodbo, skupni temelj njenih odnosov s tretjimi državami; zato meni, da se bo s pristopom dodatno okrepilo zaupanje državljanov v Evropsko unijo in povečala verodostojnost EU v pogovorih o človekovih pravicah z državami nečlanicami; prav tako poudarja, da je za zagotovitev verodostojnosti v teh pogovorih v enaki meri pomembno tudi enotno in popolno izvajanje Listine o temeljnih pravicah na ravni EU;
Recalls that promotion of respect of human rights, a core value of the EU as enshrined in its founding treaty, constitutes common ground for its relations with third countries; takes the view, therefore, that accession will further enhance the confidence of citizens in the European Union and the EU's credibility in talks on human rights with non-member States; stresses, furthermore, that the uniform and full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights at EU level is equally essential to ensure the Union's credibility in this dialogue;
ugotavlja, da ima EKČP pomembno vlogo pri razlagi Listine o temeljnih pravicah, saj se morajo pravice, zajamčene z listino in ki se ujemajo s pravicami, priznanimi z EKČP, razlagati v skladu z EKČP in se v skladu s členom 6(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji Sodišče pri oblikovanju splošnih načel prava Unije zgleduje po EKČP; prav tako ugotavlja, da se EKČP, v skladu z njenim členom 53, ne sme razlagati kot da omejuje ali ogroža pravice, ki jih priznava Listina o temeljnih pravicah, ki ohranja vso svojo pravno veljavnost;
Notes that the ECHR has an important function in connection with the interpretation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as rights guaranteed by the Charter which correspond to rights recognised by the ECHR must be interpreted in accordance with the Convention and as, by virtue of Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the ECHR constitutes a source of inspiration for the Court of Justice of the European Union in the formulation of general principles of Union law; notes likewise that, pursuant to Article 53 of the ECHR, the Convention cannot be interpreted as limiting or adversely affecting the rights recognised by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, so that the latter retains its full legal force;
vztraja, da sta EKČP in sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice pomembna za vzpostavitev pravnega okvira in temeljnih načel za sedanje in prihodnje ukrepanje Evropske unije na področju državljanskih svoboščin, pravosodja in notranjih zadev, zlasti ob upoštevanju novih oblik vključevanja in usklajevanja državljanskih svoboščin, pravosodja in notranjih zadev, ki so bile uvedene z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in s sprejetjem stockholmskega programa;
Emphasises the significance of the ECHR and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights in providing a legal framework and guiding principles for current and future EU action in the domain of civil liberties, justice and home affairs, especially in the light of the new forms of integration and harmonisation in civil liberties, justice and home affairs initiated by the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon and the adoption of the Stockholm Programme;
poudarja, da bo tak pristop najprej in predvsem prispeval k skladnejšemu notranjemu sistemu človekovih pravic v Evropski uniji; meni, da bo okrepil kredibilnost Evropske unije v očeh njenih državljanov na področju varstva človekovih pravic, saj bo zagotovil polno in učinkovito spoštovanje temeljnih pravic vedno, ko gre za pravo EU;
Stresses that the accession will, first and foremost, contribute to a more coherent human rights system within the EU; takes the view that the accession will strengthen the EU's credibility in the eyes of its own citizens in the field of human rights protection, ensuring full and effective respect for fundamental rights whenever EU law is in play;
poudarja, da po tem pristopu ne bo več možno spodbijati pristojnosti Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice pri obravnavanju primerov iz področja EKČP na podlagi notranjih pravnih struktur EU; poudarja tudi, da pristojnosti Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ne smejo biti omejene na evropske državljane ali geografsko ozemlje Evropske unije (na primer v primerih misij ali delegacij);
Underlines that, after the accession, the competence of the European Court of Human Rights when judging matters coming under the ECHR may not be contested on the basis of the internal structure of EU law; underlines also that the competence of the European Court of Human Rights must not be limited to European citizens or to the geographical area of the European Union (for example in the case of missions or delegations);
ugotavlja, da bo pristop EU k EKČP zagotovil dodaten mehanizem za uveljavljanje človekovih pravic, predvsem možnost vložitve pritožbe pri Evropskem sodišču za človekove pravice v zvezi z ukrepanjem ali opustitvijo ukrepanja institucije EU ali države članice, ki izvaja pravo EU in hkrati spada pod pristojnost EKČP; vseeno poudarja, da to ne spreminja sedanje ureditve pristojnosti Sodišča Evropske unije ali pristojnosti Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in da zahteva, da so notranja pravna sredstva izčrpana, ostane pogoj za dopustnost zahteve; poziva, naj se zahteve in pritožbe državljanov obravnavajo v razumnem roku; Komisijo spodbuja, naj v sodelovanju s Sodiščem Evropske unije in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice pripravi nekaj smernic o notranjih pravni sredstvih v Uniji in o vprašanju predhodnega odločanja v pravu Unije; glede tega poudarja, da bo treba zagotoviti, da bodo v primeru obravnave spornega vprašanja v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami sodišča držav članic zadevo predložila Sodišču Evropske unije;
Notes that EU accession to the ECHR will provide an additional mechanism for enforcing human rights, namely the possibility of lodging a complaint with the European Court of Human Rights in relation to an act, or a failure to act, by an EU institution or a Member State implementing EU law and falling within the remit of the ECHR; stresses, however, that this does not alter the present system of jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union nor that of the European Court of Human Rights, and that the requirement that all domestic judicial remedies should have been exhausted will remain the condition for the admissibility of any application; calls for applications and complaints to be dealt with in a reasonable period of time; encourages the Commission to provide some guidance, in consultation with the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights, on what constitutes the appropriate domestic remedy within the Union and on preliminary rulings under EU law; stresses, in this context, that it will be necessary to ensure that Member State courts refer cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union when there is arguably a fundamental rights issue at hand;
poudarja, da bo pristop hkrati zahteval povečano sodelovanje med nacionalnimi sodišči, Sodiščem Evropske unije in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice na področju varstva temeljnih pravic. meni, da bo sodelovanje med dvema evropskima sodiščema pospešilo razvoj skladnega sistema sodne prakse na področju človekovih pravic;
Stresses that, at the same time, the accession will require enhanced cooperation between national courts, the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights in protecting fundamental rights; points out that cooperation between the two European courts will further the development of a coherent case-law system in the field of human rights;
poleg tega pozdravlja, da člen 1 EKČP zagotavlja varstvo ne le državljanom EU in drugim posameznikom na ozemlju Unije, ampak tudi vsem posameznikom, ki spadajo v njeno pristojnost tudi zunaj njenega ozemlja;
Welcomes, further, the fact that Article 1 of the ECHR would not only guarantee protection to EU citizens and other individuals within Union territory, but also outside Union territory to any individuals who come under its jurisdiction;
se zaveda dejstva, da pristop sam po sebi ne bo rešil zelo resnih težav, s katerimi se sooča sistem EKČP, in sicer s preveliko delovno obremenitvijo zaradi eksponentnega naraščanja števila pritožb posameznikov ter z reformo strukture in delovanja Sodišča za rešitev tega problema; ugotavlja, da Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice priznava dejstvo, da deluje v zapletenih sodnih in političnih razmerah, ter nadalje ugotavlja, da bi začetek veljavnosti protokola št. 14 s 1. junijem 2010 nedvomno pripomogel k zmanjšanju števila nezaključenih postopkov, vendar pa ne tudi k njihovi odpravi; poudarja, da je treba v okviru reforme Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice upoštevati pomen deklaracije iz Interlakna in zlasti njenega četrtega odstavka, ki poziva k enotnemu in strogemu izvajanju meril glede sprejemljivosti zahtevkov in pristojnosti sodišča;
Is aware that accession as such will not resolve the extremely serious problems facing the ECHR system, namely on the one hand the excessive workload due to an exponential increase in the number of individual requests and on the other hand the reform of the structure and functioning of the Court to cope with it; notes that the European Court of Human Rights recognises that it operates in a complex legal and political environment, and notes that the entry into force of Protocol No 14 on 1 June 2010 will certainly help to reduce the number of uncompleted procedures but will not eliminate them; stresses, in the context of the reform of the European Court of Human Rights, the importance of the Interlaken Declaration, with particular reference to paragraph 4 thereof, which rightly calls for a uniform and rigorous application of the criteria concerning admissibility and the Court's jurisdiction;
meni, da je nujno ohraniti neodvisnost osebja in proračunske politike Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;
Considers it essential to maintain the independence of the European Court of Human Rights in terms of personnel and budgetary policy;
opozarja na dejstvo, da Pogodba o delovanju Evropske unije ob upoštevanju ustavnega pomena pristopa Unije k EKČP za pristop določa stroga pravila, saj mora Svet po odobritvi Evropskega parlamenta odločitev o sklenitvi sporazuma sprejeti soglasno, sporazum pa ne bo začele veljati, dokler ga v skladu s svojimi ustavnimi predpisi ne bodo potrdile vse članice;
Draws attention to the fact that, in view of the constitutional importance of accession by the Union to the ECHR, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union lays down stringent conditions for this, the Council being required to adopt the decision concluding the agreement unanimously after approval has been given by the European Parliament, and the agreement entering into force only after its approval by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional rules;
spodbuja nacionalne parlamente držav članic EU, naj jasno izrazijo svojo voljo in pripravljenost za pospeševanje pristopnega procesa s tem, da vključijo nacionalna sodišča in ministrstva za pravosodje;
Encourages the national parliaments of the EU Member States to clearly express their will and readiness to facilitate the accession process by involving their national courts and ministries of justice;
ugotavlja, da Unija s pristopom k EKČP posredno priznava celotni sistem zaščite človekovih pravic, kot se je razvil in uzakonil s številnimi dokumenti in organi Sveta Evrope; v tem smislu predstavlja pristop Unije k EKČP prvo ključno dejanje, ki ga je med drugim treba dokončati s pristopom Unije k Evropski socialni listini, podpisani v Torinu 18. oktobra 1961 in revidirani v Strasbourgu 3. maja 1996, kar bi bilo skladno z napredkom, ki je že bil dosežen z Listino o temeljnih pravicah in s socialno zakonodajo Unije;
Notes that accession by the Union to the ECHR signifies the recognition by the EU of the entire system of protection of human rights, as developed and codified in numerous documents and bodies of the Council of Europe; in this sense, accession by the Union to the ECHR constitutes an essential first step which should subsequently be complemented by accession by the Union to, inter alia, the European Social Charter, signed in Turin on 18 October 1961 and revised in Strasbourg on 3 May 1996, which would be consistent with the progress already enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and in the social legislation of the Union;
poziva tudi, naj se Unija pridruži organom Sveta Evrope, kot so Odbor za preprečevanje mučenja, Evropska komisija proti rasizmu in nestrpnosti ter Evropska komisija za učinkovito pravosodje; prav tako poudarja, da mora biti Unija vključena v delo komisarja za človekove pravice, Evropskega odbora za socialne pravice, Vladnega odbora za Evropsko socialno listino in Evropskega odbora za migracije ter zahteva, da se ga ustrezno obvešča o zaključkih in sklepih teh organov;
Calls, further, for the Union to accede to Council of Europe bodies such as the Committee on the Prevention of Torture (CPT), the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) and the European Commission on the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ); stresses also the need for the Union to be involved in the work of the Commissioner for Human Rights, the European Committee of Social Rights (ECSR), the Governmental Social Committee and the European Committee on Migration, and asks to be duly informed of the conclusions and decisions of these bodies;
meni, da je treba v korist državljanov, demokracije in človekovih pravic v Evropi in EU ter za zagotovitev njihovega spoštovanja in zagotavljanja okrepiti sodelovanje med institucijami Evropske unije in posebnimi organi Sveta Evrope, da bi se na vseevropski ravni poskusilo prispevati k večji usklajenosti in dopolnjevanju na področju človekovih pravic;
Takes the view that, for the benefit of citizens, democracy and human rights in Europe and the EU, and to guarantee respect for and the safeguarding of human rights, cooperation between the institutions of the European Union and the specialised bodies of the Council of Europe should be strengthened in order to help bring about greater consistency and greater complementarity in the sphere of human rights at pan-European level;
predlaga, naj Svet Evrope in EU preučita razvoj smernic z jasnimi obrazložitvami vseh posledic in vplivov, ki jih bo prinesel pristop, da se državljane ozavesti o dodani vrednosti, ki jo prinaša; vztraja, da morajo Komisija in države članice zagotoviti informacije državljanom EU, da bodo ti lahko v celoti razumeli, kaj so novi mehanizmi in kako jih ustrezno uporabiti;
Suggests that, in order to raise awareness of the added value of the accession to citizens, the Council of Europe and the EU should develop guidelines with clear explanations of all the implications and effects of accession; maintains that the Commission and Member States should provide EU citizens with information ensuring that they are fully aware of what the additional mechanism means and how to use it adequately;
34poudarja pomen neformalnega organa za usklajevanje izmenjave informacij med Evropskim parlamentom in Parlamentarno skupščino Sveta Evrope; 35.
34.Stresses that it is important to have an informal body in order to coordinate information sharing between the European Parliament and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe; 35.
poudarja, da pristop k EKČP zadeva ne le institucije EU, temveč tudi državljane Unije, zato je treba pridobiti mnenje Evropskega parlamenta, ga vključiti v celoten postopek pogajanj in ga na vseh stopnjah pogajanj vključevati in takoj in v celoti obveščati, kot je določeno v členu 218(10) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji;
Stresses that, as accession to the ECHR affects not only the EU institutions, but also the Union's citizens, the European Parliament must be consulted and involved throughout the negotiation process, and must be associated and immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, as provided for in Article 218(10) of the Treaty on European Union;
pozdravlja zavezanost trenutnega španskega predsedstva, da pristop obravnava kot „nujno zadevo“ ter pozitiven in sodelovalen odnos Sveta Evrope v tem pogledu; poziva belgijsko in madžarsko predsedstvo, naj si čimbolj prizadevata pristop končati ob prvi ustrezni priložnosti ter na tem bolj enostaven in dostopen način, da bodo državljani Unije kar najhitreje lahko uživali koristi pristopa Unije k EKČP;
Welcomes the commitment shown by the current Spanish Presidency in treating the accession as a ‘matter of urgency’ and the positive and cooperative attitude of the Council of Europe in this respect; calls on the Belgian and Hungarian Presidencies to do their utmost to finalise the accession at the earliest suitable opportunity and in as simple and accessible a manner as possible, so that EU citizens may benefit as soon as possible from the Union's accession to the ECHR;