natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
sta Francija in Nizozemska po referendumih 29. maja in 1. junija 2005 zavrnili ratificiratiUstavo, zaradi česar se je postopek ratifikacije ustavil v večini preostalih desetih držav članic,
France and the Netherlands, following referendums held on 29 May and 1 June 2005 respectively, have declined to ratify the Constitution – with the result that the ratification process has subsequently stalled in most of the remaining ten Member States,
člen 48 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določa, da Ustava ne bo začela veljati, razen če in dokler je ne ratificirajo vse države članice,
under Article 48 of the Treaty on European Union, the Constitution will not enter into force unless and until it is ratified by all Member States,
Izjava 30, priložena k Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo, pravi, da "če v dveh letih po podpisu Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo štiri petine držav članic to pogodbo ratificira in ima ena ali več držav članic težave v postopku ratifikacije, se zadeva odstopi Evropskemu svetu",
declaration 30 annexed to the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, states that 'if 2 years after the signature of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, four fifth of the Member States have ratified and one or more Member States have encountered difficulties with proceeding with ratification, the matter will be referred to the European Council',
je treba spoštovati tiste države članice in njihovo prebivalstvo, ki so ratificirali Ustavo, kot tudi tiste, ki je niso, ter natančno analizirati razloge za negativna izida v Franciji in na Nizozemskem,
it is necessary to respect those Member States and their peoples which have ratified the Constitution as well as those which have not, and to analyse carefully the reasons for the negative results in France and the Netherlands,
se zdi, da je bilo glasovanje proti bolj izraz nezadovoljstva zaradi trenutnega stanja Unije kot izrecno nasprotovanje ustavnim reformam, vendar pa se zaradi izida tega glasovanja paradoksalno ohranja status quo in onemogočajo reforme,
the No votes appear to have been rather more an expression of dissent at the present state of the Union than a specific objection to the constitutional reforms, but, paradoxically, the result of the Noes is to maintain the status quo and block reform,
je Evropski svet v svoji izjavi z dne 18. junija 2005 to analizo potrdil in sprejel stališče, da "ti izidi ne postavljajo pod vprašaj prispevkov državljanov pri oblikovanju Evrope", temveč da "so državljani izrazili zaskrbljenost, ki jo je treba upoštevati"; Evropski svet se je zato odločil za "obdobje za razmislek, ... da bi omogočil široko razpravo, v katero bodo vključeni državljani, civilna družba, socialni partnerji, državni parlamenti in politične stranke"; voditelji vlad pa so se strinjali, da bodo v prvi polovici leta 2006 "ocenili vse razprave v državah članicah in se dogovorili o nadaljnjem postopanju",
the European Council confirmed this analysis by taking the view, in its Declaration of 18 June 2005, that 'these results do not call into question citizens" attachment to the construction of Europe' but that 'citizens have nevertheless expressed concerns and worries which need to be taken into account'; the European Council therefore decided on a 'period of reflection ... to enable a broad debate to take place in each of our countries, involving citizens, civil society, social partners, national parliaments and political parties'; the heads of government agreed that in the first half of 2006 they would 'make an overall assessment of the national debates and agree on how to proceed',
so v tej izjavi voditelji vlad izjavili, da se postopek ratifikacije lahko nadaljuje, in se tudi strinjali, da je treba podaljšati prvotni rok za začetek veljavnosti Ustave (1. november 2006),
in that Declaration, the heads of government declared that the ratification process could continue, and also agreed that the original timetable for the entry into force of the Constitution (1 November 2006) would be extended,
Evropski svet ni dovolj pojasnil ciljev obdobja za razmislek ali opredelil metod in okvira za oblikovanje zaključkov iz te razprave in je od takrat pri njem opaziti pomanjkanje politične volje in sposobnosti za spodbujanje in vodenje evropskega dialoga,
the European Council, however, failed to give a clear focus to the period of reflection or to define the methods and the framework for drawing conclusions from this debate, and has since been seen to lack both the political will and the capacity to stimulate and manage the European dialogue,
je Evropski svet decembra 2005 Komisiji naložil, naj pripravi "celovit in obsežen pregled, ki bo zajemal vse vidike porabe EU, vključno s skupno kmetijsko politiko (SKP), ter pregled sredstev, vključno z rabatom za Združeno kraljestvo" v letih 2008/2009,
the European Council in December 2005 charged the Commission with delivering a 'full, wide-ranging review covering all aspects of EU spending, including the CAP, and of resources, including the UK rebate' in 2008/2009,
ugotavlja, da se je obdobje za razmislek začelo z razpravo o kontekstu, ne o besedilu, z vprašanji, kot so prihodnost evropskega socialnega modela, evropske gospodarske možnosti, hitrost širitve, srednjeročni proračun in enotni trg na področju storitev - vprašanji, ki brez izjeme stojijo v ospredju,
the period of reflection has started with debates on the context rather than the text, with issues such as the future of the European social model, European economic prospects, the speed of enlargement, the medium term budget and the single market in services, all featuring prominently,
Komisija je objavila svoj prispevek k obdobju za razmislek s ciljem, da s podpiranjem nacionalnih razprav in spodbujanjem pobud na ravni Skupnosti ponovno vzpostavi zaupanje javnosti v Evropsko unijo, ki ne bi smela odvrniti vseh evropskih političnih institucij od skupnega prizadevanja ali vodenja, ki resno obravnava strateški pomen Ustave in politično realnost pogojev, od katerih je odvisen njen uspeh,
the Commission has published its contribution on the period of reflection with the aim of restoring public confidence in the European Union by supporting national debates and promoting initiatives at community level, but this should not prevent all of Europe's political institutions from making a combined effort or from exercising leadership which takes seriously the strategic importance of the Constitution and the political reality of the preconditions upon which its success depends,
potrjuje svoje prepričanje, da Pogodba iz Nice ni trajna osnova za nadaljevanje procesa evropske integracije;
Reaffirms its conviction that the Treaty of Nice is not a viable basis for the continuation of the European integration process;
potrjuje svojo zavezanost, da brez nepotrebnega odlašanja doseže ustavno ureditev, s katero se bodo okrepili parlamentarna demokracija, preglednost in načelo pravne države, utrdile temeljne pravice, razvilo državljanstvo in povečala sposobnost razširjene Unije za učinkovito ukrepanje doma in na tujem; se boji, da Unija brez ustavne ureditve ne bo mogla pričakovati podpore svojih državljanov, ohraniti zagona integracije in postati verodostojen partner v svetovnih zadevah; opozarja na svojo podporo Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo, da bi bili s tem doseženi ti cilji; poziva Evropski svet, da tudi junija 2006 svečano razglasi enako zavezanost za ustavno ureditev za prihodnost Evrope;
Confirms its commitment to achieving without undue delay a constitutional settlement which strengthens parliamentary democracy, transparency and the rule of law, anchors fundamental rights, develops citizenship, and enhances the capacity of the enlarged Union to act effectively at home and abroad; fears that without such a constitutional settlement it will not be possible for the Union to expect the support of its citizens, to maintain the momentum of integration and to become a credible partner in world affairs; recalls its endorsement of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe as achieving these objectives; calls also on the European Council of June 2006 solemnly to declare the same commitment to a constitutional settlement on the future of Europe;
priznava, da je pri ratifikaciji Ustave prišlo do težav, ki se lahko izkažejo za nepremostljive, če se ne sprejmejo ukrepi, s katerimi bi pomirili bojazni, izražene v Franciji, na Nizozemskem in drugod;
Acknowledges that the ratification of the Constitution has now encountered difficulties which may prove to be insurmountable unless measures can be taken to meet the concerns expressed in France, the Netherlands and elsewhere;
poudarja, da nadaljnja širitev Unije po pristopu Bolgarije in Romunije ni več možna na podlagi Pogodbe iz Nice;
Stresses that it is not possible to further enlarge the Union after the accession of Bulgaria and Romania on the basis of the Treaty of Nice;
opozarja, da politične težave ter institucionalne slabosti, ki jih je obravnavala Konvencija, ne bodo minile in se bodo celo večale, razen če in dokler ne bodo uveljavljene reforme, predvidene v Pogodbi o Ustavi za Evropo;
Recalls that the political problems and institutional weakness that the Convention was set up to address will persist – and, indeed, grow – unless and until the reforms enshrined in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe are brought into force;
ugotavlja, da se veliko izraženih pomislekov nanaša bolj na splošne in specifične probleme konteksta kot pa na samo besedilo; meni, da bi bilo lažje najti rešitev glede besedila, če bi v zvezi s temi problemi lahko dosegli napredek;
Notes that many of the concerns expressed relate more to general and specific problems of context than to the text itself; considers that if progress can be made in such issues, it will be easier to find a solution regarding the text;
nasprotuje predlogom za oblikovanje jedrnih skupin nekaterih držav članic, dokler je ustavni postopek še v teku; ostro obsoja kakršen koli predlog, da bi zunaj sistema EU oblikovali koalicije nekaterih držav; opozarja, da mora okrepljeno sodelovanje spodbujati uresničevanje ciljev Unije, zaščititi njene interese in krepiti njene integracijske procese ter da mora biti v vsakem trenutku odprto za vse države članice; med drugim opozarja, da se takega sodelovanja ne bi smelo vzpostaviti na račun prizadevanj za dosego Ustave za Evropo brez nepotrebnih zamud;
Resists proposals to establish core groups of certain Member States while the constitutional process is still in train; deplores any suggestion that coalitions of certain Member States could be formed outside the EU system; points out that forms of enhanced cooperation should promote the achievement of the Union's aims, preserve its interests and reinforce the process of integration, and be open to all the Member States at any time; also stresses that these possible forms of cooperation should not be implemented to the detriment of the efforts being made to arrive at a Constitution for Europe without undue delay;
opozarja, da lahko strategija, ki temelji na selektivnem izvajanju Ustave, uniči soglasje, s katerim je bilo doseženo ravnotežje med institucijami in državami članicami, s čimer bi se zaostrila kriza zaupanja;
Warns that a strategy based on the selective implementation of the Constitution risks destroying the consensus that achieved a balance between the institutions and among Member States, thereby aggravating the crisis of confidence;
ugotavlja, da obstaja zgolj omejeno število demokratičnih reform, ki se jih na tej stopnji lahko uvede brez spreminjanja pogodbe, vendar z revizijo poslovnika ali medinstitucionalnega sporazuma, kot so na primer preglednost sprejemanja zakonodaje v Svetu, uvedba oblike državljanske pobude, izboljšanje postopka komitologije, polna uporaba 'prehodnih' določb na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev ter strožji nadzor parlamentov držav članic nad zadevami EU;
Notes that there are only a limited number of democratic reforms that can be introduced at this stage without treaty change but by revision of rules of procedure or inter-institutional agreement – such as transparency of law-making in the Council, introduction of a form of citizens" initiative, improvements to the comitology procedure, full use of the 'passerelle' clauses in the field of justice and home affairs, and the more rigorous scrutiny by each national parliament of its government's conduct of EU affairs;
predlaga, da bi obdobje za razmislek uporabili za ponoven začetek projekta ustave na podlagi široke javne razprave o prihodnosti evropske integracije; meni, da bi moral biti cilj evropskega dialoga, o rezultatih katerega se ne bi smelo vnaprej soditi, pojasniti, poglobiti in demokratizirati soglasje o Ustavi in obravnavati kritike ter poiskati rešitve za primere, v katerih pričakovanja niso bila izpolnjena;
Proposes to use the current period of reflection to re-launch the constitutional project on the basis of a broad public debate about the future of European integration; resolves that this European dialogue – whose results should not be prejudged – should aim to clarify, deepen and democratise the consensus around the Constitution and address criticisms and find solutions where expectations have not been met;
pozdravlja začetke široke razprave o smeri politike Unije, vendar poudarja, da mora razprava potekati v okviru premagovanja ustavne krize in da morajo biti politične določbe na ravni EU neposredno povezane s pravili, pooblastili in postopki institucij EU ter s pristojnostmi, ki jih države članice prenesejo na EU, in morajo opredeliti vprašanja, ki so skupna vsej Evropi;
Welcomes the beginnings of a broad debate about the Union's policy direction but stresses that this must take place within the context of overcoming the constitutional crisis, and that policy prescriptions at EU level must relate directly to the rules, powers and procedures of the EU institutions as well as to the competences conferred on the EU by the Member States and should identify the issues that are common throughout Europe;
predlaga, da je novi demokratični dialog treba voditi in usklajevati po vsej Uniji, strukturiran pa mora biti po skupnih temah in realističnih stopnjah glede na dogovorjeni okvir za ocenjevanje, oblikovan pa tako, da vodi h ključnim političnim odločitvam;
Suggests that this new dialogue, which should be seen as a chance to promote European democracy, should be conducted and coordinated across the Union, structured by common themes and in realistic stages according to an agreed framework for evaluation, and designed to lead to decisive political choices;
vztraja, da mora javna razprava potekati tako v Evropskem kot tudi v nacionalnem okviru; opozarja, da ozko osredotočene nacionalne razprave ne doprinesejo veliko k spremembi nacionalnih stereotipov in da bi vsiljen dialog brez političnih ciljev postal nejasen, celo prazen, kar bi povečalo nezadovoljstvo evropskih državljanov;
Insists that the public debate be engaged within both the European and the national framework; warns that narrowly focused national debates will do little to change national stereotypes, and also that an imposed dialogue without political goals would become nebulous, even vacuous, thereby giving rise to increased disaffection on the part of European citizens;
predlaga, da bi morali Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti skupaj organizirati konference – "parlamentarne forume" – , da bi spodbudili razpravo in postopoma oblikovali potrebne politične zaključke; druge institucije EU bodo povabljene k sodelovanju na forumih;
Proposes that the European Parliament and national parliaments should jointly organise conferences – 'Parliamentary Forums' – in order to stimulate the debate and to shape, step by step, the necessary political conclusions; will invite the other EU institutions to contribute to the Forums;
priznava, kako zelo pomembno je, da Evropska unija, zlasti pa Parlament, prepreči ponovno zaustavitev ustavnega postopka; zato se zavezuje, da bo imel vodilno vlogo v evropskem dialogu, v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti, zlasti z objavo "evropskih dokumentov" o vsaki pomembni temi za Unijo, ki se lahko uporabijo kot skupni evropski model za nacionalne razprave in ki bi jih bilo treba skupaj s prispevki nacionalnih parlamentov uporabiti kot podlago za posvetovanja parlamentarnih forumov;
Recognises the critical importance for the European Union and in particular for Parliament of avoiding another setback in the constitutional process; commits itself therefore to playing a leading role in the European dialogue in association with the national parliaments, in particular by publishing 'European Papers' on each of the big issues facing the Union, which may be used as a common European template for the national debates and which, together with contributions from national parliaments, should be used as the basis for the deliberations of the Parliamentary Forums;
priznava, da je strateškega pomena, da politične institucije spodbujajo dejavni odnos medijev (zlasti televizije, tiska in lokalnih radijskih postaj) in da si zagotovijo njihovo sodelovanje pri oglaševanju in krepitvi razprave;
Recognises that it is strategically important for political institutions to encourage a pro-active attitude on the part of the media (in particular television, the press and local radio) and to enlist them for the purpose of publicising and intensifying the debate;
predlaga, da bi prvi medparlamentarni forum sklicali spomladi 2006, pred junijskim zasedanjem Evropskega sveta, da bi slišali tako nacionalne kot evropske poslance, s ciljem oblikovanja obsežna priporočila Evropskemu svetu o tem, kako naj Unija ravna, da bo našla pot iz krize;
Proposes that a first interparliamentary Forum be convened in the spring of 2006, in advance of the June meeting of the European Council, in order to hear parliamentarians, both national and European, the aim being to make comprehensive recommendations to the European Council about how the Union should proceed to find the way out of the crisis;
predlaga, da bi moral prvi parlamentarni forum določiti omejeno število prednostnih vprašanj o prihodnosti Evrope in upravljanju Unije, ki jih je treba obravnavati na naslednjih forumih in v široki javni razpravi, in sicer:
Proposes that the first Parliamentary Forum should identify a limited number of priority questions about the future of Europe and the governance of the Union which should be addressed in subsequent Forums and in the broader public debate, such as:
kaj je cilj evropske integracije?
what is the goal of European integration?
kakšno vlogo bi morala imeti Evropa v svetu?
what role should Europe have in the world?
kakšna je prihodnost evropskega socialnega in gospodarskega modela glede na globalizacijo?
in the light of globalisation, what is the future of the European social and economic model?
kako definirati meje Evropske unije?
how do we define the boundaries of the European Union?
kako povečati svobodo, varnost in pravičnost?
how do we enhance freedom, security and justice?
kako financirati Unijo?
how do we finance the Union?
meni, da se bodo z obširno razpravo o teh temeljnih vprašanjih odprle nove perspektive za evropsko integracijo in pripravil prostor za reforme skupnih politik na področjih, kjer obstajajo nesoglasja;
Believes that a rich debate on these fundamental issues will open up new perspectives for European integration and prepare the ground for reform of the common policies in those areas where dissension exists;
hkrati meni, da se lahko z evropskim dialogom ustavno krizo premaga le, če so vanj vključene vse institucije EU ter državni in regionalni parlamenti, lokalna oblast, politične stranke, socialni partnerji, civilna družba, akademska skupnost in mediji; v zvezi s tem poudarja posebno vrednost praktičnega prispevka Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora in Odbora regij;
Believes, moreover, that the European dialogue will only overcome the constitutional crisis if it engages not only each EU institution but also national and regional parliaments, local government, political parties, social partners, civil society, the academic community and the media; puts particular value in this regard upon practical contributions from the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions;
državam članicam naroča, naj s pomočjo Komisije na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni organizirajo številna javna srečanja in razprave v medijih o prihodnosti Evrope – državljanske forume, ki obravnavajo sporazumno dogovorjene teme; poziva socialne partnerje in organizacije civilne družbe, da sodelujejo v teh razpravah;
Requests Member States to organise a large number of public meetings and media debates on the future of Europe - 'Citizens" Forums' - at national, regional and local level, structured along the commonly agreed themes, with the assistance of the Commission; urges the social partners and civil society organisations to get engaged in these debates;
pričakuje, da bodo politične stranke dale večji poudarek evropski dimenziji tako v notranjih razpravah kot volilnih kampanjah;
Expects political parties to give much more prominence to the European dimension in both their internal debates and electoral campaigning;
bi z veseljem sprejel peticije državljanov, ki prispevajo k oblikovanju razprave;
Would welcome citizens" petitions that contribute to shaping the debate;
poziva Unijo, naj da precej večjo prednost politiki kulture in izobraževanja, da bi s tem udejanjila geslo Ustave "enotnost v različnosti";
Urges the Union to give much greater priority to cultural and educational policy in order to give life to the Constitution's formula of 'unity in diversity';
poudarja, da evropski dialog brez ustreznega financiranja ne bo mogoč;
Points out that a European dialogue will be impossible without adequate funding;
predlaga, da je zaključke v zvezi z obdobjem za razmislek treba oblikovati v drugi polovici leta 2007 in da se na tej stopnji sprejme jasna odločitev o tem, kako v prihodnje ravnati glede Ustave;
Suggests that the conclusions of the period of reflection should be drawn at the latest in the second half of 2007, and that a clear decision be reached at that stage about how to proceed with the Constitution;
pozdravlja izjavo nemške vlade, da namerava med svojim predsedovanjem Svetu v prvi polovici leta 2007 sprejeti pobude glede postopka ratifikacije Ustave;
Welcomes the declaration of the German government that it intends to take initiatives with regard to the constitutional ratification process during its Presidency of the Council in the first half of 2007;
ugotavlja, da ima Unija teoretično na voljo številne možnosti: lahko povsem opusti projekt ustave, nadaljuje s poskusi ratifikacije sedanjega besedila v nespremenjeni obliki, pojasni ali dopolni sedanje besedilo, na novo uredi in/ali spremeni sedanje besedilo, da bi ga izboljšala, ali pa ga napiše povsem na novo;
Notes that there is in theory a number of options available to the Union ranging from abandoning the constitutional project altogether, continuing to try to ratify the present text unamended, seeking to clarify or add to the present text, restructuring and/or modifying the present text with the aim of improving it, or embarking upon a complete re-write;
meni, da bi predstavljala pozitivni izid obdobja za razmislek ugotovitev, da se sedanje besedilo lahko ohrani, pri čemer bi to bilo možno le z znatnimi ukrepi, s katerimi bi pomirili in prepričali javno mnenje;
Considers that a positive outcome of the period of reflection would be that the current text can be maintained, although this would only be possible if accompanied by significant measures to reassure and convince public opinion;
pozdravlja načrte avstrijskega predsedovanja Svetu, da predstavi zemljevid poti za obdobje za razmislek ter za prihodnost ratifikacijskega procesa na splošno;
Welcomes the plans of the Austrian Presidency of the Council to present a roadmap for the reflection period as well as for the future of the ratification process in general;