natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vseeno se strinja s poročilom raziskave TEEB, da ima merjenje ekonomske vrednosti biotske raznovrstnosti metodološke omejitve in ne bi smelo zasenčiti etičnega in medgeneracijskega vidika ohranjanja biotske raznovrstnosti;
Agrees, nevertheless, with the TEEB study report that there are methodological limitations to measurement of the economic value of biodiversity and this should not overshadow the ethical and inter-generational aspects of biodiversity conservation;
je enako zaskrbljen, ker na mednarodni politični agendi ni zavesti o nujnosti ustavitve izgubljanja biotske raznovrstnosti;
Is deeply concerned about the absence of any sense of urgency in halting the loss of biodiversity in the international political agenda;
globoko obžaluje, da ni bil izpolnjen cilj EU, ki je bil zastavljen na evropskem vrhu v Gothenburgu leta 2001, da se do leta 2010 zaustavi izgubljanje biotske raznovrstnosti ter deli zaskrbljenost mnogih piscev peticij Evropskemu parlamentu;
Deeply regrets that the EU's objective, as agreed to at the European Summit in Gothenburg in 2001, to halt biodiversity loss by 2010 has not been met and shares the concern expressed by many petitioners to the European Parliament;
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije o „možnostih za vizijo in cilje EU glede biotske raznovrstnosti po letu 2010“,
Welcomes the Commission's communication on options for an EU vision and target for biodiversity beyond 2010;
poleg tega pozdravlja sklepe Sveta za okolje o biotski raznovrstnosti z dne 15. marca 2010, ki obsegajo nov glavni cilj, to je do leta 2020 zaustaviti izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemskih storitev v EU in jih, kolikor je mogoče, obnoviti brez poseganja v naravne spremembe biotske raznovrstnosti ter sklepe Evropskega sveta z dne 25. in 26. marca 2010, ki potrjujejo, da je treba nujno ustaviti sedanje trende izgube biotske raznovrstnosti in degradacije ekosistemov;
Welcomes furthermore the conclusions on biodiversity of the Environment Council of 15 March 2010, including the new headline target of halting the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the EU by 2020 and restoring them in so far as feasible, without prejudice to natural changes in biodiversity, as well as the European Council Conclusions of 25-26 March 2010 confirming the urgent need to reverse continuing trends of biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation;
meni, da je zaustavitev izgube biotske raznovrstnosti najnižja možna raven prizadevanj, ki jih je treba uresničiti do leta 2020;
Believes that halting biodiversity loss constitutes the absolute minimum level of ambition to be realised by 2020;
poudarja, da se že izvajajo dragocene pobude za obnovitev biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemskih storitev, in meni, da morajo biti tudi te dejavnosti del glavnega cilja za leto 2020;
Points to the valuable initiatives aimed at restoring biodiversity and ecosystem services already taking place and believes that such restoration activities must also be part of the 2020 headline target;
meni, da je v primerih, ko podatki niso popolni, pomembna podrobna okoljska, ekonomska in socialna presoja vplivov;
Considers that a thorough environmental, economical and social impact assessment is needed in cases where data are lacking;
glede na globalni značaj biotske raznovrstnosti in ekosistemov ter njihove pomembne vloge pri globalnih ciljih o trajnostnem razvoju in zmanjšanju revščine in lakote ter izboljšanju zdravja in dobrega počutja ljudi je prepričan, da mora tudi prihodnja strategija EU pospešiti mednarodna prizadevanja EU za preprečevanje izgube biotske raznovrstnosti, saj je v študijah, kot je TEEB, na voljo dovolj dokazov, da je takšno početje stroškovno učinkovito in izvedljivo, na ta način pa bi prispevali k uresničitvi razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015;
Given the global character of biodiversity and ecosystem services and their crucial role for the global objectives of sustainable development, reducing poverty and hunger and improving health and human well-being, is convinced that the future EU strategy must also step up EU international efforts to avert biodiversity loss, as studies such as TEEB have delivered sufficient evidence that doing this is cost effective and feasible, and thereby contribute more effectively to achieving the Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
poleg tega poudarja, da mora politika, namenjena varstvu in izboljšanju biotske raznovrstnosti, vključevati skupno politiko EU za obravnavanje problematike invazivnih tujih vrst ter poudarja tesno povezavo med prometnimi koridorji in obsežnim vnosom tujih vrst;
Underlines furthermore that, as a part of a policy aimed at protecting and improving biodiversity, a common EU policy to tackle the problem of invasive alien species is necessary, and points out the particularly close link between transport corridors and the large-scale introduction of alien species;
priznava, da ima celotno in ustrezno izvajanje zakonodaje Natura 2000 pomembno vlogo pri doseganju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo, podnebnimi spremembami in cilji trajnostnega razvoja; v zvezi s tem meni, da je nujno, da se v prihodnje izrazito okrepi sodelovanje z uporabniki zemljišč pri izvajanju Nature 2000; poudarja, da je pristop Natura 2000 že pokazal izredne uspehe;
Recognises that a full and correct implementation of Natura 2000 legislation plays a major role in achieving the EU's biodiversity, climate change, and sustainable development objectives; in this regard, considers it vital that future cooperation with land users in implementing Natura 2000 be thoroughly reinforced and cooperative; emphasises that the Natura 2000-approach has already shown some remarkable successes;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v celoti izvajajo člen 6 direktive o habitatih;
Calls on the Commission and Member States, to fully implement Article 6 of the Habitats Directive;
vendar je kljub pozitivnim in oprijemljivim rezultatom, ki so jih države članice dosegle na področju ohranjenosti nekaterih vrst zaskrbljen glede polnega in temeljitega izvajanja zakonodaje Natura 2000; poziva države članice, naj izvajanju omrežja Natura 2000 dajo večjo prednost;
Remains concerned, despite the positive and tangible results achieved by some Member States in the conservation status of several species, about the full and thorough implementation of Natura 2000 legislation; urges the Member States to give higher priority to the implementation of Natura 2000;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da omrežje Natura 2000 predstavlja 18 % ozemlja EU (na kopnem) in zgodnji napredek pri oblikovanju ukrepov za ohranjanje ali načrtov upravljanja; je osupel nad dejstvom, da državam članicam ni uspelo upoštevati rokov, določenih v direktivi; in jih zato poziva, naj takoj sprejmejo ukrepe za polno izvajanje direktiv o pticah in habitatih;
Welcomes the fact that the Natura 2000 network represents 18% of EU territory (on land) and the early progress made in the formulation of conservation measures or management plans; is dismayed at the failure of Member States to respect the deadlines laid down in the Directives; and therefore urges Member States to take prompt action to achieve full implementation of the Birds and Habitats Directives;
je zaskrbljen zaradi premajhnega napredka pri vzpostavljanju omrežja Natura 2000 v morskem okolju in poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj pospešijo potrebne postopke;
Expresses its concern about the lack of progress in the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment and asks the Commission and Member States to speed up the necessary procedures;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme model mreže zavarovanih morskih območij, ki bo omogočal usklajevanje med ohranjanjem okolja in trajnostnim ribolovom; poziva tudi, naj redno poroča o napredku držav članic pri izvajanju direktiv o pticah in habitatih, zlasti pri vzpostavljanju omrežja Natura 2000 v morskem okolju, saj morska območja trenutno predstavljajo manj kot 10 % zaščitenih območij, poroča pa naj tudi o obveznostih držav članic, da obveščajo o razmerah in jih spremljajo;
Calls on the Commission to adopt a model network of marine protected areas (MPAs) making it possible to reconcile preserving the environment and practising sustainable fishing; asks it to report regularly on the progress made by Member States in implementing the Habitats and Birds Directives, in particular the establishment of the Natura 2000 network in the marine environment, since currently less than 10% of protected areas are marine sites, as well as on the reporting and monitoring obligations of the Member States;
ugotavlja, da v zakonodaji EU o biotski raznovrstnosti morske vrste in habitati uživajo manjšo zaščito kakor kopenske vrste in habitati ter zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni pomanjkljivosti v tej zakonodaji in njenem izvajanju ter razvije mrežo zavarovanih morskih območij, v katerih bodo gospodarske dejavnosti, med katere spada tudi ribištvo, predmet okrepljenega ekosistemskega upravljanja;
Notes that marine species and habitats enjoy less protection than terrestrial species and habitats in EU biodiversity legislation, and therefore calls on the Commission to assess the weaknesses in the legislation and its implementation, and to develop MPAs in which economic activities, including fishing, are the subject of strengthened ecosystem-based management;
nadalje ugotavlja, da različne konvencije za regionalna morja okoli EU, kot so OSPAR, HELCOM in barcelonska konvencija, zagotavljajo pomemben okvir za zaščito morskih ekosistemov;
Further notes that the various conventions for the regional seas around the EU, such as OSPAR, HELCOM and Barcelona, provide an important framework for protecting marine ecosystems;
meni, da bi bilo treba državam članicam dovoliti, da sprejemajo pobude za zaščito biotske raznolikosti morij, ki presegajo ukrepe, določene v zakonodaji EU;
Considers that Member States must be allowed to take initiatives to protect marine biodiversity going beyond the action required under EU legislation;
opozarja, da je treba za vzpostavitev usklajenega omrežja Natura 2000 potrebno ohranjati tiste značilnosti pokrajine, ki so zelo pomembne za prosto živeče živalske in rastlinske vrste; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si dejavno prizadevajo za ohranjanje in razvoj povezanosti zaščitenih območij, bodisi kopenskih bodisi morskih, ter kmetijskih območij z visoko naravno vrednostjo;
Recalls that the establishment of a coherent NATURA 2000, requires the maintenance of those features of the landscape which are of major importance for wild flora and fauna; calls therefore on the Commission and Member States to actively engage in maintaining and developing the connectivity of protected areas, whether terrestrial or marine, as well as agricultural areas of high nature value;
se strinja z Evropsko agencijo za okolje, da so vzroki za zaskrbljenost o varstvenem stanju vrst in habitatov, ki so zaščiteni po direktivi Evropske unije o habitatih, in da ne smemo vsa prizadevanja usmeriti na ohranjanje otokov biotske raznovrstnosti, obenem pa izgubiti naravno okolje povsod drugje, kar odraža mnenje, ki ga evropski državljani pogosto izražajo v peticijah, poslanih Evropskemu parlamentu;
Supports the findings of the European Environment Agency when it states that the conservation status of species and habitats protected under the EU Habitats Directive is a cause for concern and that we should not ‘focus all our efforts on preserving islands of biodiversity, while losing nature everywhere else’, as this reflects the views very often expressed by European citizens in their petitions to the European Parliament;
opozarja Komisijo in države članice, da direktiva o morski strategiji ne omejuje uporabe zaščitenih morskih območij na Naturo 2000, in zato zahteva, da države članice in Komisija upoštevajo ter medsebojno povežejo vsa zaščitena morska območja, vključno s tistimi, ki jih določajo konvencije o regionalnih morjih, da bi ustvarile povezano in celovito omrežje;
Reminds the Commission and Member States that the Marine Strategy Directive does not limit the use of marine protected areas to Natura 2000, and therefore requests that Member States and the Commission take account of and create linkages between all marine protected areas, including those designated under regional seas conventions, with the aim of creating a coherent and comprehensive network;
ugotavlja, da se na področju okoljske zakonodaje EU ni mogoče popolnoma izogniti subsidiarnosti, a ga skrbi, da lahko ta stopnja prožnosti privede do zlorab pri njenem izvajanju s strani držav članic; obžaluje osupljive razlike med državami članicami, na primer v zvezi z „zunanjim učinkom“ območij Natura 2000, skupinskimi izjemami za nekatere „obstoječe dejavnosti“ ali uporabo načela previdnosti; v primeru takih izrazitih razlik poziva k ugotavljanju, ali zadevne države članice ne uporabljajo pravil na tak način, da bi ovirale uresničitev načrtovanih ciljev glede biotske raznovrstnosti;
Takes note of a certain unavoidable degree of subsidiarity in EU environmental legislation, but is concerned that this degree of flexibility can lead to abuses by Member States when implementing it; regrets the striking differences between Member States regarding, for example, the ‘external effect’ of Natura 2000 sites, block exemptions for certain ‘existing activities’ or the application of the precautionary principle; calls, in the event of such striking differences, for inquiries into whether the Member States in question are not applying the rules in such a way as to hamper the effective achievement of the intended biodiversity goals;
glede na razlike med državami članicami poziva Komisijo, naj dodatno pojasni direktive ali zagotovi potrebne smernice, pri čemer naj pojasnitev ali smernice po možnosti temeljijo na najboljših praksah in/ali naj jih te odražajo;
Given these differences between Member States, invites the Commission to provide further clarification of the Directives or guidance where necessary, with such clarification or guidance ideally being based on and/or illustrated by best practices;
poudarja pomen uporabe previdnostnega načela pri vprašanjih narave, povezanih z biotsko raznovrstnostjo, v skladu s sklepi Sodišča;
Emphasises the importance of implementing the precautionary principle on nature related to biodiversity in line with the decisions of the Court of Justice;
spodbuja države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo presoje vplivov na okolje in strateške okoljske ocene v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo dovolj kakovostne, da bo zagotovljeno zanesljivo izvajanje zakonodaje Natura 2000;
Encourages Member States to ensure that environmental impact assessments and strategic environmental assessments are of sufficient quality in relation to biodiversity, in order to guarantee a sound implementation of Natura 2000 legislation;
poziva k okrepitvi direktive o presoji vplivov na okolje in k veliko strožjemu tolmačenju njenih ciljev, da ne bi bilo neto izgub, da bi – kadar je mogoče – pridobili biotsko raznovrstnost ter da bi uvedli posebne zahteve za sedanje spremljanje učinkov projektov na biotsko raznovrstnost in učinkovitosti ukrepov za ublažitev, skupaj z ustreznimi določbami za dostop do teh informacij in izvrševanje;
Calls for a strengthening of the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive, and a much more rigorous interpretation of its objectives, in order to achieve no net loss, and, where possible, gains in biodiversity, and to introduce specific requirements for the ongoing monitoring of the biodiversity impacts of projects and the effectiveness of mitigation measures, with appropriate provisions for access to this information and for enforcement;
meni, da bi čezmejno sodelovanje lahko pomembno prispevalo k uresničitvi ciljev Natura 2000;
Believes that better cross-border cooperation could have significant benefits for meeting the Natura 2000 objectives;
je zaskrbljen tudi nad pomanjkanjem čezmejnega sodelovanja, kar lahko povzroči, da se ista območja obravnavajo različno, ter poudarja, da bi bilo v zvezi s tem obstoječe instrumente, kot je Evropsko združenje za teritorialno sodelovanje, koristno uporabiti kot sodno sredstvo;
Furthermore expresses its concern about the lack of cross-border cooperation, which can lead to identical areas being approached differently, and stresses the usefulness of harnessing existing instruments, such as the European Grouping for Territorial Cooperation (EGTC), a judicial tool;
poziva Komisijo, naj se v svoji prihodnji strategiji o biotski raznovrstnosti in v okviru programa Natura 2000 bolj osredotoči na ekosistemske storitve, hkrati pa nadaljuje in okrepi prizadevanja, da bi dosegli ugoden status ohranjanja za vrste in njihove habitate;
Urges the Commission to focus more on ecosystem services in its future biodiversity strategy and within the context of Natura 2000 while at the same time building on and strengthening efforts to achieve favourable conservation status for species and their habitats;
Povezovanje z drugimi političnimi področji
Integration into other policy areas
je prepričan, da kopensko in morsko omrežje Natura 2000 ni edini instrument EU za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti, ampak je za zagotovitev uspešnosti politike EU na področju biotske raznovrstnosti potreben celovitejši pristop;
Is convinced that the Natura 2000 land and marine network is not the only EU instrument for biodiversity conservation, but that a more integral approach is needed for the EU biodiversity policy to be successful;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj z namenom vzajemne krepitve zagotovi nadaljnje povezovanje biotske raznovrstnosti z drugimi političnimi področji EU, kot so kmetijstvo, gozdarstvo, ribištvo, regionalna politika in kohezija, promet, turizem, razvojno sodelovanje ter raziskave in inovacije ter naj bolje uskladi sektorske in proračunske politike EU; poudarja obstoj velikih priložnosti, zlasti v skupni kmetijski politiki, regionalni politiki in skupni ribiški politiki, da bi dali biotski raznovrstnosti večji pomen;
Therefore, calls on the Commission to ensure a further mainstreaming of biodiversity into other EU policy areas – such as agriculture, forestry, fisheries, regional policy and cohesion, energy, industry, transport tourism, development cooperation, research and innovation – in a mutually reinforcing way and to make the European Union's sectoral and budgetary policies more consistent; stresses the great opportunities that exist, particularly in the common agricultural policy, regional policy and the common fisheries policy, to give biodiversity a higher priority;
opozarja na povezavo med upravljanjem z vodnimi viri ter biotsko raznovrstnostjo kot ključni dejavnik pri podpiranju življenja in trajnostnega razvoja;
Highlights the link between water management and biodiversity as a key factor in supporting life and in sustainable development;
meni, da imajo kmetje pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo; poudarja, da je bila leta 1992 dana pobuda za vključitev zaščite biotske raznovrstnosti v skupno kmetijsko politiko in da so bili nato z reformo leta 2003 uvedeni ukrepi, kot so navzkrižna skladnost, enotno plačilo na kmetijo (nevezanost) in razvoj podeželja, ki koristijo biotski raznovrstnosti;
Takes the view that farmers play a vital role in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective; points out that in 1992 an initial impetus was given to integrating protection of biodiversity into the common agricultural policy (CAP), and that subsequently the 2003 reform has introduced measures such as cross compliance, the single farm payment (decoupling) and rural development which have benefits for biodiversity;
izraža pa zaskrbljenost glede tega, ali bodo kmetje EU lahko še naprej konkurenčno pridelovali kakovostno hrano; meni, da bi morala reforma skupne kmetijske politike ustrezno nagraditi kmete EU za njihova prizadevanja pri uresničevanju cilja EU v zvezi z biotsko raznovrstnostjo;
Expresses, however, its concerns about the EU farmers' ability to continue to produce high-quality food competitively; believes that the CAP reform should properly reward EU farmers for their efforts in achieving the EU's biodiversity objective;
poudarja, da je kmetijska in gozdarska dejavnost v Evropi bistveno prispevala k raznovrstnosti vrst in biotopov ter zelo raznoliki kmetijski krajini, ki zdaj veljajo za potrebne zaščite; zato poudarja, da je kmetijsko krajino in biotsko raznovrstnost v Evropi dolgoročno mogoče ohraniti le s kmetijsko in gozdarsko dejavnostjo;
Points out that agricultural and forestry-related activity in Europe has contributed substantially to a diversity of species and biotopes and a varied agricultural landscape now considered in need of protection; underlines, therefore, that in the long term it is only through agricultural and forestry-related activity that the agricultural landscape can be retained and biological diversity conserved in Europe;
pozdravlja predhodne poskuse, da bi okoljske vidike povezale s skupno kmetijsko politiko (SKP), kot je uvedba kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov ter dobrih kmetijskih in okoljskih pogojev; poziva Komisijo, naj izkoristi reformo SKP kot priložnost za nadaljnjo krepitev tega trenda in si prizadeva za trajnostno kmetijstvo v EU, pri čemer morajo biti koristi za naravo vodilno načelo, na primer z uvedbo nadomestil za ekološke storitve ali zagotavljanjem javnih dobrin, skupaj s trajnostnim kmetijstvom na ekološko občutljivih območjih, kot so Natura 2000, da bi zagotovili, da bodo v prihodnje financirani samo trajnostni vidiki kmetovanja, da bodo obstoječe dobre prakse ustrezno nagrajene in podpirane ter da kmetje ne bodo finančno ali kako drugače prikrajšani, na ta način pa se oblikujejo pogoji za kmetije, da lahko prispevajo k biotski raznovrstnosti tudi v prihodnje;
Welcomes the previous attempts to integrate environmental considerations as an integral part of the common agricultural policy (CAP), such as the introduction of agri-environment measures and good agricultural and environmental conditions; calls on the Commission to use the reform of the CAP as an opportunity to further enhance this trend, working towards fully sustainable farming in the EU, whereby the benefits to nature constitute a guiding principle, for example through the introduction of remuneration for eco-services or the delivery of well defined public goods, including sustainable farming in ecologically sensitive areas, such as Natura 2000 sites, so as to ensure that sustainable ways of farming are funded in the future, that where good practice exists it is properly rewarded and encouraged and that farmers are not financially or otherwise disadvantaged, thus creating the conditions for farms to be able to continue contributing to biodiversity in the future;
poziva Komisijo, naj večjo pozornost nameni zagotavljanju skladnosti z vsemi evropskimi predpisi in direktivami, ki obravnavajo ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti;
Calls on the Commission to pay greater attention to ensuring compliance with all European regulations and directives dealing in particular with maintaining biodiversity;
ugotavlja, da je Evropska unija v okviru svoje kmetijske politike določila pravila na podlagi navzkrižne skladnosti za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, vendar obžaluje, da pogosto ni enotnega izvajanja in spremljanja teh pravil po vsej EU;
Finds that the EU has, in the Union's agricultural policy, laid down regulations under cross compliance which conserve biodiversity, but regrets that they are often not implemented and monitored throughout the EU;
se zaveda, da je tudi politika rabe zemljišč bistven element pri ohranjanju narave, ter poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si še naprej prizadevajo za boljšo vključitev meril o biotski raznovrstnosti v proces odločanja na lokalni in regionalni ravni pri vprašanjih v zvezi z rabo zemljišč in ozemeljsko politiko, vključno z regionalno in kohezijsko politiko;
Is aware that land use policy is another key element in the conservation of nature and urges the Commission and Member States to continue to improve the integration of biodiversity criteria in decision-making processes at local and regional level in matters concerning land use and territorial policy, including in regional and cohesion policy;