natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zahteva nadaljnje podrobne informacije na ravni Komisije in držav članic, ter na ravni regij, če je potrebno, o ukrepih, ki se izvajajo, ukrepih, ki se ne izvajajo, razlogih za zamude, časovnih rokih, učinkovitosti izvajanja itd., da dobi popoln pregled nad doseženimi rezultati in odprtimi vprašanji, ki jih je še treba obravnavati; poziva Komisijo, da te informacije predloži kot del priprave na postopek razrešnice za leto 2005;
Requests further detailed information at Commission level and Member State level, and at regional level if needed, on measures implemented and not implemented, reasons for delays, deadlines, effectiveness of implementation and such like, so as to be allowed to have a complete overview of results obtained and outstanding issues still to be dealt with; calls on the Commission to submit to it this information as part of the preparation of the 2005 discharge procedure;
spremlja in pregleda izvajanje predlaganega akcijskega načrta na podlagi ocene pomanjkljivosti, ki jo predloži Komisija, ter preveri učinkovitost nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov pri obvladovanju tveganja napak na podlagi tekočega petletnega revizijskega programa,
follow and examine the implementation of the Action Plan proposed, based on the Commission's gap assessment, and test the effectiveness of the supervisory and control systems in managing the risk of error over a five year rolling audit programme,
oceni s tem povezano zagotovilo, ki ga vsako leto predložijo generalni direktorati glede delovanja nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov ter glede ustreznosti dopolnilnih ukrepov, ki se sprejmejo, kadar ti ne delujejo učinkovito, zlasti v državah članicah;
assess the related assurance which the Directorates-General give annually on the effective operation of the supervisory and control systems and the adequacy of the supplementary measures taken when they do not operate effectively, in particular in the Member States;
Izjava o zanesljivosti
on the results achieved;
ugotavlja, da sedanja enotna izjava o zanesljivosti ne pokriva dovolj dobro področij uspeha in neuspeha; ugotavlja, da se veliko nacionalnih revizijskih sistemov združuje na podlagi posameznih oddelkov; predlaga, da pregled sistema DAS izvede Računsko sodišče, da se oblikujejo posebne izjave o zanesljivosti za posamezne generalne direktorate v okviru Komisije in v okviru skupne DAS;
Notes that the current single declaration of assurance does not adequately describe areas of success and areas of failure; notes that many equivalent national audit systems are compiled on a department by department basis; suggests that a review of the DAS system be undertaken by the Court of Auditors in order to establish specific statements of assurance for individual Directorates-General within the Commission within an overall DAS;
ugotavlja, da bi tak sistem, skupaj z enakovrednim sistemom nacionalnih izjav oblikoval matrico, ki bi določala najbolj zaskrbljujoča področja tako horizontalno, v zvezi s programi Komisije, kakor tudi vertikalno, v zvezi z odgovornostmi držav članic;
Notes that such a system, coupled with an equivalent system of national statements, would create a matrix identifying areas of most concern both horizontally, regarding Commission programmes, and vertically, concerning Member State responsibilities;
poudarja, da sta preprostost in preglednost dve najpomembnejši orodji finančnega nadzora; vztraja, naj Komisija pri načrtovanju shem in programov upošteva povezavo med želenim rezultatom določene sheme, celovitostjo pravil, ki jo urejajo, ter verjetnostjo pojava napake;
Underlines that simplicity and transparency are two of the most important principles of financial control; insists that the Commission when designing schemes and programmes should consider the relationship between the desired outcomes of a particular scheme, the complexity of the rules governing it and the likelihood of an error occurring;
poziva Komisijo, da oblikuje poročilo o učinkovitosti obstoječega regulativnega okvira v zvezi s sistemi upravljanja, zanesljivosti in certificiranja izjav različnih organov držav članic, pri čemer naj upošteva:
Asks the Commission to produce a report on the effectiveness of the existing regulatory framework regarding management, assurance and certification systems of declarations of the Member States' various bodies, taking into consideration:
natančno stopnjo izvajanja obstoječe zakonodaje s strani držav članic in regulativnega mehanizma;
the precise degree of implementation of the existing legislation by Member States and the regulatory mechanism;
njegove birokratske in upravne stroške za evropske davkoplačevalce;
its bureaucratic and administrative cost to the European taxpayers;
njegovo dodano vrednost pri preprečevanju nepravilnega upravljanja in obnovitvi sredstev Skupnosti;
its value added in the prevention of misadministration and the recovery of Community funds;
njegov vpliv pri pravilni razdelitvi odgovornosti;
its influence in the correct attribution of responsibilities;
skladnost različnih obstoječih sistemov prijave;
the coherence of the various existing declaration systems;
prednosti uporabe enotnega postopka prijave držav članic v okviru finančne uredbe, namesto razpršene sektorske zakonodaje;
the advantages of instituting a single Member State declaration procedure in the context of the Financial Regulation instead of disperse sectoral legislation;
Izjave o upravljanju, zanesljivosti in certificiranju na nacionalni ravni
National management, assurance and certification declarations
Ob upoštevanju potrebe, da ni dvoma o obstoječem ravnotežju med Komisijo in državami članicami o tem, ali da sta ogroženi obveznost in odgovornost na operativni ravni, Svet meni, da lahko obstoječe deklaracije na operativni ravni priskrbijo pomembna zagotovila za Komisijo in končno za Računsko sodišče ter bi morala biti koristna in stroškovno učinkovita ter bi jih morala upoštevati Komisija in končno Računsko sodišče za dosego pozitivne DAS
Taking into account the need not to put into question the existing balance between the Commission and the Member States or to compromise responsibility and accountability at the operational level, the Council believes existing operational-level declarations can provide an important means of assurance for the Commission and ultimately the Court of Auditors and should be useful and cost effective and be taken into account by the Commission and ultimately the Court of Auditors to attain a positive DAS
zavrača zaključek Sveta, da bi instrumenti, ki jih predlaga Parlament, lahko "vzbudili dvome o obstoječem ravnotežju med Komisijo in državami članicami", ker poudarjo le odgovornost držav članic, kakor je določeno v drugem stavku prvega odstavka člena 274 Pogodbe;
Rejects the conclusion of the Council that the instruments proposed by Parliament would "put into question the existing balance between the Commission and the Member States" since they simply underline Member States' responsibility as stated in the second sentence of the first paragraph of Article 274 of the Treaty;
pozdravlja pobude Sveta o povečanju odgovornosti držav članic za izboljšanje nadzora nad dejavnostmi, opravljenimi v okviru deljenega upravljanja, katerega cilj je doseganje pozitivne DAS in predvsem obveze Sveta o pripravi letnega pregleda revizij in izjav na primerni nacionalni ravni;
Welcomes the initiatives taken by the Council to reinforce the responsibility of the Member States for improving the control of actions under shared management, with the aim of achieving a positive DAS, and especially the commitment by the Council to producing an annual summary at the appropriate national level of the available audits and declarations;
opozarja, da medtem ko je Komisija v skladu s členom 274 Pogodbe odgovorna za izvrševanje proračuna, so države članice odgovorne za nadzor nad sredstvi v deljenem upravljanju, ki so opredeljena v sektorskih predpisih in njihovih podrobnih pravilih;
Recalls that whilst the Commission is responsible under Article 274 of the Treaty for the implementation of the budget, the Member States have responsibility for the controls over funds in shared management which are defined in the sector regulations and in their detailed rules;
opozarja na dejstvo, da lahko države članice svobodno organizirajo te nadzore tako, kot menijo, da je najboljše glede na njihove institucionalne in upravne strukture ter veljavne mednarodne standarde in upošteva, da bi morale države članice, tako kot Komisija, upoštevati mednarodne standarde, in da so v praksi odgovornosti dodeljene veliko različnim organom, ki poročajo ministrstvom nacionalnih vlad ali regionalnim vladam;
Draws attention to the fact that Member States are free to organise these controls in the way each considers best, given their institutional and administrative structures and the international standards applying and taking into account that Member States, like the Commission, should respect international standards, and that in practice, responsibilities are allocated to a large number of different bodies reporting to ministries of the national government or to regional governments;
meni, da bi si morala Komisija prizadevati za enako umestitev v prostoru plačilnih agencij (Skupna kmetijska politika - SKP) in organov upravljanja (strukturni skladi), ter kadar je mogoče, obe združiti v vsaki državi članici, da se Komisiji omogoči dobro spremljanje, kdaj in kako se porabljajo sredstva EU v vsaki državi članici;
Believes that the Commission should strive for the same geographical location of paying agencies (Common Agricultural Policy - CAP) and managing authorities (Structural Funds) and whenever possible combine the two in each Member State in order to enable it to keep a good track of where, when and how EU funds are being spent in each Member State;
meni, da je treba zaradi obstoječega velikega števila odgovornih nadzornih organov pozdraviti in podpreti pobude za standardizacijo ureditve revizij;
Considers that, as responsibilities are entrusted to so many existing audit bodies, initiatives aimed at bringing about standardisation of audit arrangements should be welcomed and supported;
poudarja, da člen 274 Pogodbe zahteva tudi, da države članice sodelujejo s Komisijo za zagotovitev, da je poraba proračunskih sredstev v skladu z načeli dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Stresses that Article 274 of the Treaty also requires that Member States cooperate with the Commission to ensure that appropriations are used in accordance with the principles of sound financial management;
zato ugotavlja, da bi morala biti Komisija sposobna od vsake države članice zahtevati zagotovila, da so bile tovrstne odgovornosti za nadzor v celoti izpolnjene ter zlasti, da je tveganje napak pri poslovnih dogodkih dovolj obvladljivo;
Finds, therefore, that the Commission should be able to request assurance from each Member State that these control responsibilities have been fully met, and in particular that the risk of error in the underlying transactions is being sufficiently managed;
meni, da je izjava na politični ravni, ki zajema vsa sredstva Skupnosti v deljenem upravljanju, in ki jo podpišejo ministri za finance, kakor se predlaga v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji Parlamenta o razrešnici iz leta 2003, še vedno nujna in bi predstavljala velik korak naprej;
Believes that a declaration at political level covering all Community funds in shared management and signed by finance ministers, as proposed in its above mentioned 2003 discharge resolution, is still a necessity and would be a big step forward;
opozarja na dejstvo, da stopnja mogočega podpisa na ravni držav članic večinoma ni vprašanje oblike, ampak predvsem znak, ki kaže pričakovano kakovost nadzornih in kontrolnih sistemov, ki delujejo na podlagi podpisa; opzarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 2. februarja 2006 o izjavah o državnem upravljanju
Draws attention to the fact that the level of a possible signature at Member State level is not mainly a matter of form but first and foremost a signal showing the expected quality of the supervisory and control systems operating under the signature; recalls its resolution of 2 February 2006 on national management declarations
Sprejeta besedila,
Texts adopted
, ki upošteva, da bi omenjene nacionalne izjave morale v praksi vsebovati "več izjav znotraj nacionalnega okvira in ne le ene, da bi upoštevale federalne in decentralizirane politične sisteme v nekaterih državah članicah";
which recognised that in practice these national declarations might comprise "several declarations within a national framework, rather than one alone, in order to acknowledge the federal and decentralised political systems in existence in some Member States";
ugotavlja odpor držav članic ter želi biti pragmatičen in konstruktiven ter poudarja, da je pomembno poiskati način za prepoznavanje pomanjkljivosti v sedanjih kontrolnih in nadzornih sistemih ter za sprejemanje primernih sanacijskih ukrepov, da se doseže boljše finančno poslovodenje sredstev EU;
Notes Member States' resistance and wants to be pragmatic and constructive and stresses that the important thing is to find a way of identifying the weaknesses in the current control and supervisory systems and to undertake appropriate remedial action with a view to achieving better financial management of EU funds;
pozdravlja razpravo o tem, kateri organ bi bil za to najboljši, ter poziva Komisijo in Svet, da obravnavata alternativni pristop, ki izhaja iz interesov Sveta za izjave na sektorski ravni, kakor je izraženo v odstavku 9sklepov Ekonmosko-finančnega sveta "Komisija bi morala v sodelovanju z državami članicami zagotoviti oceno sedanjih nadzorov na sektorski in regionalni ravni ter vrednost obstoječih izjav in deklaracij."
Welcomes a discussion about which authority might be the best for the purpose and invites the Commission and the Council to consider the alternative approach inspired by the Council's interest in declarations at sector level as expressed in paragraph 9 of the ECOFIN Council conclusions "The Commission, working with the Member States, should provide an assessment of the present controls at sector and regional level and the value of existing statements and declarations."
Predhodne in naknadne deklaracije za vsako področje finančnih perspektiv
Ex ante and ex post declarations for each area of the financial perspectives
usmerja pozornost k naslednjim številkam:
Draws attention to the following figures:
za obdobje 1994 - 1999 je Komisija odobrila 1 104 programe Strukturnih skladov in 920 projektov Kohezijskega sklada (odstavek 5.4 letnega poročila Sodišča);
for the 1994 - 1999 period the Commission approved 1 104 Structural Funds programmes and 920 Cohesion Fund projects (paragraph 5.4 of the Court of Auditors' annual report);
za obdobje 2000 - 2006 obstaja 606 programov Strukturnih skladov, 1 163 projektov Kohezijskega sklada in 72 projektov ISPA (odstavek 5.4 letnega poročila Sodišča);
for the 2000 - 2006 period there are 606 Structural Funds programmes, 1 163 Cohesion Fund projects and 72 instruments for structural policy for pre-accession projects (paragraph 5.4 of the Court of Auditors' annual report);
vsak program lahko zajema več tisoč projektov (odstavek 5.10 letnega poročila Sodišča);
each programme may contain several thousand projects (paragraph 5.10 of the Court of Auditors' annual report);
v okviru SKP je 91 plačilnih agencij (glej tabelo 4.2 letnega poročila Sodišča);
under the CAP there are 91 Paying Agencies (table 4.2 in the Court of Auditors' annual report);
se v celoti strinja s Sodiščem, ko izjavlja, da "glavno pripadajoče tveganje v zvezi z zakonitostjo in pravilnostjo odhodkov za strukturne ukrepe izhaja iz številnosti različnih teles in organov oblasti, ki posegajo v postopek upravljanja, velikega števila programov in projektov, ki se izvajajo več let, ter možnosti za morebitne pomanjkljivosti v upravljavskih in kontrolnih sistemih"; se prav tako strinja z izjavo, da "za upravičenost odhodkov veljajo številni pogoji, ki niso vedno jasni in povzročajo tveganje, da bo prihajalo do različnih razlag" (odstavek 5.10 letnega poročila Sodišča);
Agrees fully with the Court when it states that the "main inherent risks to the legality and regularity of expenditure for structural measures arise from the variety of bodies and authorities which intervene in the management process, the large number of programmes and projects to be implemented over a period of years and the scope for potential weaknesses in the management and control systems"; also agrees with the statement that "there are a large number of conditions governing the eligibility of expenditure which are not always clear, giving rise to the risk of divergent interpretations" (paragraph 5.10 of the Court of Auditors' annual report);
poudarja, da niti Komisija končno niti Sodišče ne moreta pregledati vsakega posameznega potrdila in/ali revizijskega poročila, ki izhaja iz primarne ali sekundarne stopnje kontrole zaradi zelo velikega števila projektov, programov in plačilnih agencij;
Underlines that neither the Commission, nor, ultimately, the Court, is in a position to scrutinize every individual certificate and/or audit report emanating from primary or secondary control level due to the very high number of projects, programmes and paying agencies;
zato meni, da je treba obstoječe visoko število posameznih potrdil in/ali revizijskih poročil znotraj vsakega pomembnega sektorja konsolidirati na osrednji ravni držav članic, pri čemer je treba zagotoviti kakovost informacij v posameznih deklaracijah, izdanih na nižji stopnji; predlaga, da bi morale biti zato države članice dejavno udeležene pri okrepitvi uporabnosti rezultatov neodvisnih revizij v verigi nadzora; meni, da bi ta pristop pomembno pripomogel k poenostavitvi ter bi dal dragocen pregled zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov na nacionalni ravni ter bi temu ustrezno prispeval k pridobitvi zagotovila;
Takes the view therefore that the existing high number of individual certificates and/or audit reports within each major sector should be consolidated at central Member State level, whereby the quality of the information in the individual declarations issued at lower level should be guaranteed; suggests that Member States should thus participate actively in enhancing the usability of independent audit results in the chain of control; believes that this approach would aid simplification considerably and that it would give a valuable overview of the legality and regularity of the transactions at national level and accordingly contribute to the assurance to be drawn;
poziva Komisijo, da predstavi predloge v zvezi z obliko in vsebino teh dopolnilnih dogovorov v smislu izvajanja zgoraj navedenega Akcijskega načrta za integrirani okvir notranje kontrole, ter kot začasen ukrep poziva države članice, da določijo organ na osrednji ravni držav članic kot pristojen in odgovoren za izdajo deklaracij in obveščanje Komisije o tem;
Invites the Commission to present proposals as regards the form and content of these complementary arrangements in the context of the implementation of the above mentioned Action Plan towards an Integrated Internal Control Framework and as a temporary measure invites the Member States to identify the body at central Member State level to be responsible and accountable for issuing the declarations and to inform the Commission accordingly thereof;
Predhodna izjava o razkritju
Ex ante disclosure statement
Naknadne izjave o zanesljivosti
Ex post declaration of assurance
vztraja, da bi morala Komisija, dokler se takšna sektorska konsolidacija ne vzpostavi na osrednji ravni držav članic za vsako območje finančnih perspektiv in ob ugotovitvi nepripravljenosti držav članic, da bi Komisiji dale zagotovilo, ki ga potrebuje, v celoti uporabljati člen 53(5) Finančne uredbe, na podlagi katerega Komisija prevzame končno odgovornost za izvrševanje proračuna na podlagi člena 274 Pogodbe prek "postopka za potrditev obračuna ali mehanizma finančnih popravkov";
Insists that until such a sectoral consolidation at central Member State level for each area of the financial perspectives has been put in place and having noted Member States' unwillingness to give the Commission the assurance it needs, the Commission should fully apply Article 53(5) of the Financial Regulation under which it shall assume final responsibility for the implementation of the budget in accordance with Article 274 of the Treaty through "clearance-of-accounts procedures or financial correction mechanisms";
poziva države članice k izdaji prostovoljne izjave na nacionalni ravni v smislu iz odstavka 45; priporoča, da se za vsako državo članico, ki da takšno izjavo, uporablja skrajšan revizijski program, če Komisija meni, da dejansko predstavlja manjšo nevarnost napake kakor država članica, ki ni izdala takšne izjave;
Invites Member States to issue a voluntary declaration at national level in the sense described in paragraph 45; recommends that any Member State giving such a declaration be subject to a reduced audit programme if the Commission feels that it would present in fact a lower risk of error than a Member State not issuing such a declaration;
iskreno poziva nacionalne parlamente (zlasti nacionalne odbore za javne finance in odbore v okviru konference odborov za zadeve Evropske unije in Skupnosti - COSAC), da to vprašanje obravnavajo z nacionalnimi vladami;
Warmly invites national parliaments (in particular national public accounts committees and committees forming part of the Conference of Committees for European and Community Affairs of the European Union Parliaments - COSAC) to discuss this matter with their national governments;
poziva Komisijo in Sodišče, da na podlagi trdnih dokazov potrdita, da bo konsolidacija na osrednji ravni držav članic in za vsako področje finančne perspektive, za katerega se zagotovi kakovost posameznih poročil in/ali revizijskih poročil, učinkovit ukrep za podporo skupni izjavi na politični ravni, ki zajema vsa sredstva Skupnosti v deljenem upravljanju;
Invites the Commission and the Court to confirm on the basis of concrete evidence that consolidation at central Member State level and for each area of the financial perspective by which the quality of individual reports and/or audit reports is guaranteed will be an effective measure in support of an overall declaration at political level covering all Community funds in shared management;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za preglednost in pričakuje, da bo omogočila dejanske ukrepe in zakonodajne pobude, ki bodo omogočili preglednost v zvezi z načinom porabe in upravljanja sredstev EU;
Welcomes the Commission's transparency initiative and expects it to lead to concrete actions and legislative initiatives that will lead to transparency regarding the way EU funds are spent and managed;
poziva Komisijo, da stori vse, kar je v njeni pristojnosti, in države članice prepriča, da omogočijo javni dostop do informacij o projektih in upravičencih sredstev EU v deljenem upravljanju;
Invites the Commission to do everything in its power to induce Member States to give public access to information about the projects and beneficiaries of EU funds in shared management;
meni, da zdajšnje razmere, ko večina držav članic ni omogočila javnega dostopa do informacij o projektih in upravičencih sredstev EU v deljenem upravljanju, ne koristijo celotni preglednosti v EU; zato odločno poziva Komisijo in države članice, da odpravijo to nepravilnost;
Feels that the current situation where most Member States have not given the public access to information about projects and beneficiaries of EU funds in shared management does not benefit overall transparency in the EU; strongly urges therefore the Commission and the Member States to resolve this anomaly;
opozarja na potrebo po večji odprtosti v zvezi z različnimi vrstami strokovnih skupin, ki svetujejo Komisiji in odborom, ki delujejo v postopku komitologije;
Draws attention to the need for more openness with regard to the different types of expert groups advising the Commission and also the committees working within the comitology procedure;