natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je 1. decembra 2009 začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba, ki je v prizadevanjih za okrepitev legitimnosti in odgovornosti Evropske unije ustvarila potrebne pogoje za okrepljeno sodelovanje državljanov v postopkih odločanja,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon came into force on 1 December 2009, creating the necessary premises for increased participation by citizens in the EU decision-making process, in an effort to reinforce its legitimacy and accountability,
ker Parlament neposredno zastopa državljane Evropske unije, njihova pravica nasloviti peticijo, ki je zapisana v pogodbi, pa jim omogoča, da se obrnejo na svoje predstavnike, kadar koli menijo, da so bile njihove pravice kršene,
whereas citizens of the EU are directly represented by Parliament, and the right of petition as enshrined in the Treaty offers them the means to address their representatives whenever they consider that their rights have been infringed,
ker ima izvrševanje evropske zakonodaje neposredne posledice za državljane, ki lahko najbolje ocenijo njeno učinkovitost in pomanjkljivosti ter pokažejo na vrzeli, ki jih je treba zapolniti pri zagotavljanju skladnosti s cilji Unije,
whereas enforcement of European legislation has a direct impact on citizens, who are the best placed to assess its effectiveness and its shortcomings and to signal remaining gaps that need to be filled in order to ensure adherence to the Union's objectives,
ker se v primerih kršitve evropske zakonodaje evropski državljani posamezno in skupinsko obračajo na Parlament po pravna sredstva,
bearing in mind that European citizens, individually and collectively, turn to Parliament for redress when European law is broken,
ker je Parlament dolžan, da prek Odbora za peticije prouči take primere in stori vse, kar je v njegovi moči, da kršitve ustavi; ker Odbor za peticije pri iskanju kar najustreznejših in hitrih pravnih sredstev za državljane redno tesno sodeluje s Komisijo, drugimi parlamentarnimi odbori, evropskimi organi, agencijami in omrežji ter z državami članicami,
whereas Parliament, through its Committee on Petitions, has an obligation to investigate such concerns and to do its best to bring such breaches of the law to an end; whereas, in order to offer citizens the most appropriate and rapid remedies, the Committee on Petitions has continued to reinforce its cooperation with the Commission, other parliamentary committees, European bodies, agencies and networks, and Member States,
ker je Parlament leta 2009 prejel nekaj več peticij kot leta 2008 (1924 v primerjavi s 1849) in se je potrdil naraščajoči trend pošiljanja peticij po elektronski poti (v tej obliki je bilo v letu 2009 poslanih okoli 65 % peticij, v primerjavi s 60 % leto poprej),
whereas the number of petitions received by Parliament in 2009 was slightly higher than that recorded in 2008 (i.e. 1924 compared with 1849), and the growing trend for petitions to be submitted electronically was confirmed (about 65 % were received in this form in 2009 as against 60 % in 2008),
ker število nedopustnih peticij, prejetih v letu 2009, kaže, da bi bilo treba nameniti poseben poudarek obveščanju državljanov o pristojnostih Unije in vlogi njenih različnih institucij;
whereas the number of inadmissible petitions received in 2009 indicates that additional emphasis should be placed on informing citizens better about the competences of the Union and the role of its various institutions,
ker v mnogih primerih državljani peticije na Parlament naslovijo zaradi odločb pristojnih upravnih ali sodnih organov držav članic; ker državljani torej potrebujejo mehanizme, prek katerih lahko od državnih organov zahtevajo, naj v evropskem zakonodajnem procesu, pa tudi pri procesu izvrševanja zakonodaje, zastopajo njihove interese,
whereas, in many instances, citizens petition Parliament about decisions taken by the competent administrative or judicial authorities within Member States, and whereas citizens need mechanisms through which they can call national authorities to account for their part in both the European legislative process and in the legislative enforcement process,
ker bi morali državljane zlasti ozavestiti, da – kot je decembra 2009 ugotovil evropski varuh človekovih pravic v sklepu, s katerim je zaključil preiskavo pritožbe 822/2009/BU zoper Komisijo – so postopki pred nacionalnimi sodišči del izvajanja evropske zakonodaje v državah članicah in da Odbor za peticije ne more obravnavati zadev, ki so v postopku pred nacionalnimi sodišči, ali oceniti rezultat takega postopka,
whereas citizens should, in particular, be made aware that – as recognised by the European Ombudsman in the decision of December 2009 closing the inquiry into complaint 822/2009/BU against the Commission – national court proceedings are part of the process of implementing European legislation in the Member States, and that the Committee on Petitions cannot deal with issues subject to national court proceedings or review the outcome of such proceedings,
ker so lahko visoki stroški sodnih postopkov, še posebej v nekaterih državah članicah, ovira za državljane in jim dejansko utegnejo preprečiti, da bi začelo postopke pred pristojnimi nacionalnimi sodišči, če menijo, da nacionalni organi niso spoštovali njihovih pravic v skladu z zakonodajo EU,
whereas the high costs of court procedures, particularly in some Member States, can constitute an obstacle for citizens and might actually prevent them from bringing actions before the competent national courts when they consider that national authorities have not respected their rights under EU law,
ker se Parlament sooča s posebnim problemom, ko prejme peticijo o tem, da nacionalno sodstvo domnevno ni zahtevalo predhodne sodbe Sodišča, čeprav bi bilo to moralo storiti po členu 267 PDEU, zlasti če Komisija ne uporabi svojih pristojnosti v skladu s členom 258 in ne ukrepa proti določeni državi članici,
whereas Parliament faces a particular problem when petitioned on alleged failures by the national judiciary to request a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice in disregard of Article 267 TFEU, especially if the Commission does not use its powers under Article 258 to taken action against the Member State in question,
ker se postopek peticij – zaradi mehanizmov delovanja in ker je pravica naslavljanja peticij s pogodbo zagotovljena vsem državljanom in prebivalcem EU – razlikuje od drugih pravnih sredstev, ki so državljanom na voljo na ravni Unije, kot je na primer naslavljanje pritožb na evropskega varuha človekovih pravic ali na Komisijo,
whereas the petitions process – through its working mechanisms and because the right to petition is granted to all EU citizens and residents under the terms of the Treaty – differs from other remedies available to citizens at EU level, such as the submission of complaints to the European Ombudsman or to the Commission,
ker imajo državljani pravico, da od vseh evropskih institucij pričakujejo hitra in v rešitev usmerjena pravna sredstva ter visoko stopnjo preglednosti in jasnosti; ker je Parlament Komisijo večkrat zaprosil, naj kot varuhinja pogodb uporabi svojo posebno pravico ter ukrepa proti kršitvam evropske zakonodaje, na katere so opozorili vlagatelji peticij, zlasti če je do kršitev prišlo ob prenosu zakonodaje Unije,
whereas citizens are entitled to speedy and solution-oriented redress and to a high level of transparency and clarity from all European institutions and whereas Parliament has repeatedly requested the Commission to use its prerogatives as guardian of the Treaty to act against breaches of European legislation revealed by petitioners, especially where transposition of EU legislation at national level results in its infringement,
ker mnoge peticije še vedno opozarjajo na zaskrbljenost glede prenosa in izvajanja evropske zakonodaje o notranjem trgu in okolju ter ob upoštevanju prejšnjih pozivov Odbora za peticije Komisiji, naj na teh področjih okrepi učinkovit nadzor nad izvajanjem zakonodaje,
whereas many petitions continue to raise concerns about the transposition and implementation of European legislation on the internal market and the environment, and bearing in mind the previous calls made by the Committee on Petitions to the Commission to ensure that enforcement checks in these areas are strengthened and made more efficient,
ker sicer lahko Komisija skladnost z zakonodajo Unije v celoti preveri šele, ko so nacionalni organi že sprejeli končno odločitev, pa je vseeno zlasti pri okoljskih zadevah in v primerih, kjer je zelo pomemben čas, treba že v zgodnji fazi preveriti, ali lokalne, regionalne in nacionalne oblasti vse ustrezne postopkovne zahteve izvajajo pravilno in v skladu z zakonodajo Unije, po potrebi pa je treba opraviti podrobne študije o izvajanju in vplivu veljavne zakonodaje, da se pridobijo vse zahtevane informacije,
whereas, although the Commission can fully check compliance with EU law only when a final decision has been taken by national authorities, it is important, particularly in relation to environmental matters and all cases in which the time aspect is especially significant, to verify at an early stage that local, regional and national authorities correctly apply all relevant procedural requirements under EU law and, when necessary, to carry out detailed studies on the application and impact of the legislation in force, in order to obtain all the requisite information,
ker je treba preprečiti dodatne nepovratne izgube biotske raznolikosti, zlasti na zaščitenih območjih Natura 2000, in ker so se države članice zavezale zagotavljanju varovanja posebnih ohranitvenih območij iz direktive o habitatih (92/43/EGS) in direktive o pticah (79/409/EGS),
bearing in mind the importance of preventing further irreparable losses in biodiversity, especially inside Natura 2000 designated sites, and the commitment by Member States to ensure the protection of special conservation areas under the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) and the Birds Directive (79/409/EEC),
ker peticije opozarjajo na vpliv evropske zakonodaje na vsakdanje življenje državljanov Unije in ker priznava, da je treba sprejeti vse potrebne ukrepe za utrditev napredka pri krepitvi pravic državljanov Unije,
whereas petitions highlight the impact of European legislation on the everyday lives of EU citizens, and recognising the need to take all necessary steps to consolidate the progress achieved in reinforcing citizens’ EU rights,
ker je Odbor za peticije v prejšnjem poročilu o dejavnostih in mnenju o letnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti zaprosil Komisijo, naj ga redno obvešča o fazah, v katerih so postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev iz peticij,
whereas, in its previous activity report and its opinion on the Commission's annual report on monitoring the application of Community law, the Committee on Petitions requested to be kept informed regularly about the stages reached in infringement procedures the subject of which is also covered by petitions,
ker je osnovna odgovornost držav članic, da evropsko zakonodajo pravilno prenesejo in izvršujejo, in ker priznava, da so bile v letu 2009 mnoge med njimi tesno vključene v delo Odbora za peticije,
bearing in mind that Member States have the primary responsibility for correctly transposing and enforcing European legislation, and recognising that many of them have been increasingly involved in the work of the Committee on Petitions in 2009,
pozdravlja nemoten prehod na novo parlamentarno obdobje in ugotavlja, da je Odbor za peticije v primerjavi z drugimi odbori veliko dela prenesel v novo obdobje, saj številne peticije niso bile zaključene v preteklem parlamentarnem obdobju,
Welcomes the smooth transition to the new parliamentary term and notes that much of work of the Committee on Petitions, unlike that of other parliamentary committees, was carried over into the new term because examination of a considerable number of petitions had not been completed;
pozdravlja začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe in je prepričan, da bo Parlament tesno vključen v razvoj nove državljanske pobude, da bo ta instrument lahko v celoti dosegel zastavljeni cilj in bo v postopkih odločanja Unije zagotovljena preglednost in odgovornost, s čimer bo državljanom omogočeno, da predlagajo izboljšave ali dopolnila k zakonodaji Unije,
Welcomes the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and is confident that Parliament will be closely involved in the development of the new citizens’ initiative so that this instrument can fully achieve its purpose and ensure enhanced transparency and accountability in the EU decision-making process, allowing citizens to suggest improvements or additions to EU law;
pozdravlja Zeleno knjigo o evropski državljanski pobudi ( KOM(2009)0622 ), 11.11.2009.
Welcomes the Green Paper on a European Citizens’ Initiative ( COM(2009)0622 ) of 11.11.2009.
, ki jo je Komisija kot prvi ukrep pri uveljavljanju tega načela v praksi objavila konec leta 2009;
, published by the Commission at the end of 2009, as a first step towards translating the concept into practice;
poudarja, da je Parlament prejel peticije v smislu kampanje, ki jih je podpisalo več kot milijon ljudi, in vztraja, da je treba državljanom celovito predstaviti razliko med tovrstnimi peticijami in državljansko pobudo;
Points out that Parliament has received campaign-type petitions bearing more than one million signatures and insists on the need to ensure that citizens are made fully aware of the distinction between this type of petition and the citizens’ initiative;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo o državljanski pobudi Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. maja 2009 s pozivom Komisiji za predložitev predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju državljanske pobude ( P6_TA(2009)0389 ).
Recalls its resolution on the citizens’ initiative European Parliament Resolution of 7 May 2009 requesting the Commission to submit a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the citizens’ initiative ( P6_TA(2009)0389 ).
, h kateri je Odbor za peticije prispeval mnenje; poziva Komisijo, naj določi podrobne izvedbene predpise, ki bodo jasno opredelili vlogo in obveznosti institucij, ki sodelujejo pri obravnavi in odločanju;
, to which the Committee on Petitions contributed an opinion; urges the Commission establish comprehensible implementing rules which identify clearly the roles and obligations of the institutions involved in the examination and decision-making processes;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe postala Listina o temeljnih pravicah pravno zavezujoča, in poudarja njen pomen pri zagotavljanju večje jasnosti o temeljnih pravicah in njihove prepoznavnosti za vse državljane;
Welcomes the legally binding force acquired by the Charter of Fundamental Rights with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty and underlines the importance of the Charter in making fundamental rights clearer and more visible to all citizens;
meni, da morajo Unija in države članice zagotoviti polno spoštovanje temeljnih pravic iz listine, in verjame, da bo listina pripomogla k razvoju koncepta državljanstva Unije;
Considers that both the Union and its Member States have an obligation to ensure that the fundamental rights included in the Charter are fully observed, and trusts that the Charter will help to develop the concept of citizenship of the Union;
verjame, da bodo opravljena vsi potrebni postopki, da bodo institucionalni vidiki pristopa Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin hitro pojasnjeni; opozarja, da želi Odbor za peticije prispevati k delu Parlamenta pri tem vprašanju;
Trusts that all necessary procedural steps will be taken to ensure that the institutional aspects of EU accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms are rapidly clarified, and notes the intention of the Committee on Petitions to contribute to Parliament's work on this matter;
opozarja na svoje že izražene zahteve, naj pristojne službe Parlamenta in Komisije opravijo popolno revizijo pravnih sredstev, ki so na voljo državljanom Evropske unije, in poudarja pomen nadaljevanja pogajanj za revidirani okvirni sporazum med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo, ki bo v celoti upošteval večje pravice državljanov EU, zlasti v zvezi z evropsko državljansko pobudo;
Recalls its previous request that a full review of the redress procedures available to EU citizens should be carried out by the relevant services of Parliament and the Commission and underscores the importance of pursuing the negotiations on the revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission in order to take full account of the increased rights of EU citizens particularly with regard to the European citizens’ initiative;
pozdravlja prizadevanje Komisije za večjo preglednost med obstoječimi službami za javno pomoč, ko je zato, da bi državljane seznanila z njihovimi pravicami v Uniji in pravnimi sredstvi, ki so na voljo v primerih kršitev, na strani
Welcomes the steps taken by the Commission to streamline the existing public assistance services, in order to inform citizens about their EU rights and the means of redress available in case of infringement, by regrouping the various relevant webpages (such as those of SOLVIT and ECC-Net) under the
Vaše pravice v Evropski uniji,
Your EU Rights
na osrednjem portalu Evropske unije, v skupine prerazporedila različne spletne strani (kot sta na primer strani Solvit in Evropska mreža centrov za varstvo potrošnikov);
chapter on the main EU website;
poudarja, da je Parlament Komisijo že večkrat pozval, naj razvije sistem za jasno označevanje različnih pritožbenih mehanizmov, ki so na voljo državljanom, in meni, da so potrebni dodatni ukrepi s končnim ciljem, da postanejo spletne strani
Points out that Parliament has repeatedly called on the Commission to develop a system for clearly signposting the various complaints mechanisms available to citizens and believes that further steps are needed, with the ultimate aim of converting the
Vaše pravice v Evropski uniji
Your EU Rights
porabniku prijaznejše in na enem mestu nudijo vse potrebne informacije; pričakuje začetno oceno izvajanja akcijskega načrta za leto 2008 Akcijski načrt za integriran pristop k zagotavljanju podpornih storitev za notranji trg državljanom in podjetjem – delovni dokument služb Komisije SEC(2008)1882 .
webpage into a user-friendly, online one-stop shop; looks forward to initial assessments of the implementation of its 2008 Action Plan Action Plan on an integrated approach for providing Single Market Assistance Services to citizens and business – Commission Staff Working Paper SEC(2008)1882 .
, ki naj bi bila pripravljena leta 2010;
, which are expected in 2010;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo o delu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2008 in spodbuja novega varuha, naj še naprej povečuje odprtost in odgovornost evropske uprave in zagotavlja, da bodo odločitve sprejete na kar najbolj odprt način in v čim tesnejši povezavi z državljani;
Recalls its resolution on the activities of the European Ombudsman in 2008 and encourages the newly re-elected Ombudsman to keep working to enhance the openness and accountability of European administration and to ensure that decisions are taken as openly as possible and at the closest possible level to citizens;
ponovno potrjuje odločenost, da urad varuha človekovih pravic podpira pri njegovih naporih za večjo ozaveščenost javnosti o njegovem delu, odkrivanju nepravilnosti v ravnanju evropskih institucij in ukrepanju zoper njih; meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic dragocen vir podatkov v skupnih prizadevanjih za izboljšanje evropske uprave;
Reaffirms its determination to support the Ombudsman's office in its efforts to raise public awareness of its work and to identify and act against instances of maladministration by European institutions; believes that the Ombudsman represents a valuable source of information in the overall endeavour to improve European administration;
je seznanjen, da so se peticije v letu 2009 – skoraj 40 % jih je bilo nedopustnih – še naprej osredotočale na okolje, temeljne pravice, pravosodje in notranji trg; gledano zemljepisno, se je večina peticij nanašala na Unijo kot celoto, sledile so ji Nemčija, Španija, Italija in Romunija, kar kaže, da državljani budno spremljajo delo Unije in od nje zahtevajo, da ukrepa;
Notes that petitions received in 2009, almost 40 % of which were deemed inadmissible, continued to focus on environment, fundamental rights, justice and the internal market; in terms of geographical focus, most of the petitions concerned the Union as a whole – followed by Germany, Spain, Italy and Romania – demonstrating that citizens do keep a watchful eye on the Union's work and turn to it for action;
se zaveda, kako pomembno je delo vlagateljev peticij in Odbora za peticije pri varovanju okolja v Uniji; pozdravlja pobudo odbora, da pred mednarodnim letom biotske raznovrstnosti naroči študijo o izvajanju direktive o habitatih, saj meni, da gre za uporabno orodje pri oceni dosedanje in pripravi nove strategije EU o biotski raznovrstnosti;
Acknowledges the importance of the work of petitioners and of its Committee on Petitions for the protection of the Union's environment; welcomes the initiative of the committee in ordering a study on the application of the Habitats Directive, in anticipation of the International Year of Biodiversity, and considers it a useful tool for evaluating the EU biodiversity strategy to date and drafting a new strategy;
opaža, da vse več peticij opozarja na težave, ki jih imajo državljani pri uveljavljanju svoje pravice do prostega gibanja; iz teh peticij je razvidno, da države članice gostiteljice potrebujejo preveč časa za izdajo dovoljenj za prebivanje družinskim članom državljanov tretjih držav, da ostajajo težave pri uveljavljanju volilne pravice in pri priznavanju kvalifikacij;
Observes that more and more petitions are highlighting the problems encountered by citizens who exercise their right to free movement; such petitions refer to the excessive length of time taken by host Member States in delivering residence permits to third-country family members, and to difficulties in exercising voting rights and having qualifications recognised;
ponavlja svoje prejšnje pozive Komisiji, naj pripravi praktične predloge za to, da se varovanje potrošnikov pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami razširi na malo gospodarstvo, kot je pozval v svoji resoluciji o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta s 16. decembra 2008 o zavajajočih podjetjih za imeniške storitve (UL C 45E, 23.2.2010, str.
Reiterates its previous calls on the Commission to put forward practical proposals to extend consumer protection against unfair commercial practices to small businesses, as requested in its resolution on misleading directory companies European Parliament resolution of 16 December 2008 on misleading directory companies, (OJ C 45 E, 23.2.2010, p.
, saj odbor še vedno prejema peticije žrtev prevar podjetij za poslovne imeniške storitve;
, as the Committee continues to receive petitions from victims of business-directory scams;
se zaveda, da ima Komisija osrednjo vlogo pri delu Odbora za peticije, ki se še naprej zanaša na njeno strokovno znanje in izkušnje pri ocenjevanju peticij, odkrivanju kršitev evropske zakonodaje in iskanju pravnih sredstev, in priznava napore Komisije za krajši odzivni čas ob njegovih prošnjah po preiskavah, da je mogoče zadeve, na katere opozarjajo državljani, reševati kolikor je mogoče hitro;
Acknowledges the central role that the Commission plays in the work of the Committee on Petitions, which continues to rely on its expertise when assessing petitions, identifying breaches of European legislation and seeking redress, and recognises the efforts made by the Commission to improve its overall response time to the Committee's requests for investigations so that cases reported by citizens can be resolved as quickly as possible;