natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Z vse večjo standardizacijo postopkov dela se bo Računsko sodišče vse lažje oprlo na delo nacionalnih nadzornih organov ter izvajalo skupne ali usklajene revizije uporabe evropskih sredstev v različnih državah članicah.
As working procedures become more standardised, it will become easier for the Court of Auditors to rely on the work of national auditing bodies and for it to develop joint or coordinated audits to look at the ways in which European funds are used in the various Member States.
Menim, da je ravno Računsko sodišče s svojim neprestanim sodelovanjem in stiki pri načrtovanju svojih dejavnosti ter pri izvajanju odgovornosti do Evropskega parlamenta najučinkovitejši mehanizem za povezovanje dela nacionalnih nadzornih organov in Evropskega parlamenta.
I think that the Court of Auditors itself, through its permanent collaboration and contact, its planning of its activities and its accountability to Parliament, is the most efficient mechanism with which to link the work of the national audit bodies with Parliament.
Poleg tega menim, da je zelo pomembno okrepiti sodelovanje med Računskim sodiščem in nacionalnimi parlamenti, ki imajo prav tako ustavni interes za dobro upravljanje javnih financ in sredstev davkoplačevalcev.
Moreover, I think it is highly important to strengthen cooperation between the Court of Auditors and the national parliaments, which also have a constitutional interest in the good administration of public finances and taxpayers' resources.
Upam, da bom dobil polno zaupanje Parlamenta na podlagi mojih strokovnih izkušenj in zavezanosti k neodvisnosti v skladu s Pogodbo.
I hope that I will be able to count on Parliament's full confidence, based on my professional record and committed independence, in line with the Treaty.
Prav tako sem prepričan, da se morajo odnosi med Sodiščem in Parlamentom razvijati v duhu zaupanja, dialoga in neprestanega sodelovanja.
I am also convinced that relations between the Court and Parliament need to develop in an environment of trust, dialogue and permanent cooperation.
Zato bi v primeru, da bi Parlament izdal negativno mnenje glede mojih strokovnih sposobnosti, špansko vlado naprosil, da ponovno premisli o mojem imenovanju.
If, therefore, Parliament were to issue an unfavourable opinion of my professional ability, I would ask the Spanish Government to reconsider my appointment.
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Andrea Češková, Ryszard Czarnecki, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iliana Ivanova, Bogusław Liberadzki, Jan Mulder, Eva Ortiz Vilella, Crescenzio Rivellini, Paul Rübig, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Michael Theurer
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Inés Ayala Sender, Andrea Češková, Ryszard Czarnecki, Martin Ehrenhauser, Jens Geier, Ingeborg Gräßle, Iliana Ivanova, Bogusław Liberadzki, Jan Mulder, Eva Ortiz Vilella, Crescenzio Rivellini, Paul Rübig, Theodoros Skylakakis, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Michael Theurer
o vodenju kakovosti za evropsko statistiko
on quality management for European statistics
o vodenju kakovosti evropske statistike
on quality management for European statistics
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom K trdnemu vodenju kakovosti za evropsko statistiko ( COM(2011)0211 ),
– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Towards robust quality management for European Statistics’ ( COM(2011)0211 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0037/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0037/2012 ),
A. ker Eurostat obstaja od leta 1953 , potreba po ohranitvi njegove neodvisnosti pa je splošno priznana;
A. whereas Eurostat has existed since 1953 and the need for safeguarding its independence is widely recognised;
B. ker je zanesljiva in natančna statistika nujno potrebna, da se omogoči učinkovito oblikovanje gospodarske in proračunske politike v državah članicah in na ravni Unije;
B. whereas reliable and accurate statistics are essential to allow effective economic and budgetary policy making by Member States and at Union level;
C. ker je za uspeh strategije Evropa 2020 za rast in delovna mesta ter paketa za gospodarsko upravljanje, tudi evropskega semestra, potrebna visokokakovostna neodvisna statistika;
C. whereas the success of the Europe 2020 Strategy for Growth and Jobs and the economic governance package, including the European Semester, demands high-quality independent statistics;
D. ker je treba uporabnikom statistike zagotoviti ustrezne, pravočasne in natančne podatke, ki jih zbirajo in urejajo nacionalne agencije v skladu z načeli nepristranskosti, objektivnosti in strokovne neodvisnosti;
D. whereas users of statistics should be supplied with relevant, timely and accurate data which are collected and compiled by national agencies in accordance with the principles of impartiality, objectivity and professional independence;
E. ker bi morala biti statistika dostopna javnosti, lahko razumljiva tako za oblikovalce politik kot za državljane in primerna za medletno primerjavo;
E. whereas statistics should be publicly accessible, easily understandable to both policy‑makers and citizens and suitable for comparison on a year-to-year basis;
F. ker je kakovost evropske statistike odvisna od neoporečnosti celotnega procesa priprave; ker pomeni posodobitev metod priprave statistike, ki je v teku, temeljno javno naložbo za racionalizacijo celotne verige priprave in zahteva trajno zavezanost na nacionalni ravni in ravni EU;
F. whereas the quality of European statistics is dependent on the integrity of the entire production process; whereas the ongoing modernisation of statistical production methods represents a vital public investment in streamlining the entire production chain, and requires continued commitment at EU and national level;
G. ker se je ob dolžniški krizi v euroombočju izkazalo, kako nevarni sta netočnost ali ponarejanje statističnih podatkov, ki izhajata iz pomanjkljivih javnofinančnih podatkovnih virov in sedanje ureditve upravljanja statističnih podatkov;
G. whereas the debt crisis in the eurozone has highlighted the dangers of statistical inaccuracy and statistical fraud arising from weaknesses in both the quality of upstream public-accounting data and the current statistical governance arrangement;
H. ker ne le, da morajo biti statistični uradi zakonsko neodvisni, temveč morajo imeti vzpostavljene tudi mehanizme in „požarne zidove“, da bi zagotovili svojo ločenost od političnega procesa in s tem preprečili sistemske napake; vendar je hkrati treba poudariti, da je država odgovorna za pravilnost in pristnost statističnih podatkov;
H. whereas statistical offices should not only be statutorily independent, but should also have mechanisms and ‘firewalls’ in place to ensure that statistical offices are separated from the political process and thus avoid systemic failures; at the same time, however, it is to be emphasised that the State is responsible for the correctness and authenticity of statistical data;
I. ker je treba okrepiti odnose med Eurostatom in nacionalnimi računskimi sodišči;
I. whereas the relation between Eurostat and the national courts of auditors should be strengthened;
J. ker je treba nacionalne statistične urade v državah članicah reformirati, da bodo čim prej skladni z novo evropsko zakonodajo;
J. whereas national statistical institutes should be reformed in the Member States to comply with the new European legislation as soon as possible;
K. ker približno 350 statističnih uredb, ki veljajo za vse države članice, sorazmerno večje breme glede skladnosti statističnih podatkov nalaga manjšim državam članicam;
K. whereas the approximately 350 statistical regulations applying to all Member States impose a proportionately higher statistical compliance burden on the smaller Member States;
L. ker bo Eurostat zagotovil gospodarske kazalnike, potrebne za nadzor fiskalnih politik in preglednico o makroekonomskih neravnovesjih, poleg novih mehanizmov izvrševanja; ker so nedavne zakonodajne reforme, zlasti „šesterček“ o gospodarskem upravljanju, postavile trdno in zanesljivo statistiko v središče gospodarskega upravljanja na ravni EU;
L. whereas Eurostat will provide the economic indicators required for the surveillance of fiscal policies and for the scoreboard on macro-economic imbalances, together with new enforcement mechanisms; whereas recent legal reforms, most notably the economic governance 'six pack', have placed robust and reliable statistics at the core of economic governance at EU level;
4. odločno poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predlaga zakonodajo, s katero se bodo elementi revidiranega kodeksa ravnanja evropske statistike uvedli v pravo EU, da bi bila jasna razlika med pristojnostmi in odgovornostmi nacionalnih statističnih agencij ter vladnih statističnih agencij, ter zagotovi preglednejšo in bolj usklajeno odgovornost za kakovost podatkov;
Urges the Commission to propose to the European Parliament and the Council proposals for legislation aimed at introducing elements of the revised European Statistics Code of Practice into EU law, with a view to distinguishing clearly between the responsibilities and competences of national statistical agencies and those of Member State governments and ensure more transparent and coordinated accountability for data quality;
7. poudarja, da bi morale vse države članice zagotavljati natančne statistike na vseh ravneh upravljanja; spodbuja Eurostat, naj javno razkrije, ali ima pomisleke glede takšne natančnosti pri vseh vrstah statistik;
Emphasises that all Members States should make sure that statistics are accurate across all levels of government; encourages Eurostat to disclose publicly whether it has doubts concerning such accuracy across all types of statistics;
10. poudarja, da mora Eurostat zagotoviti preglednost v zvezi s svojim osebjem z objavo informacij o uslužbencih (ki so javni uslužbenci) in pogodbenem osebju ter informacije o načinu napotitve nacionalnih strokovnjakov;
Emphasises the need for Eurostat to ensure transparency with regards to its own staff by publishing information regarding its officials (who are civil servants) and contract agents, and to provide information about the way in which national experts are deployed;
13. poudarja, da so vodenje kakovosti državnih finančnih statistik in drugih nacionalnih statističnih podatkov ter natančnost in pravočasno sporočanje podatkov osnovni pogoji za pravilno delovanje evropskega semestra;
Underlines the fact that quality management of government financial statistics and other national statistical data, as well as precision and timely reporting of the data, is a prerequisite for the European Semester to function properly;
16. poudarja, da je zagotavljanje natančnih, ustreznih in visokokakovostnih statističnih podatkov ključnega pomena za trajnosten in uravnotežen regionalni razvoj; ugotavlja, da so točni, natančni podatki podlaga za pridobivanje podrobnih informacij o posameznih področjih, kot so demografija, gospodarstvo in okolje, ter imajo zato ključno vlogo pri sprejemanju odločitev v zvezi z regionalnim razvojem, zlasti pri izvajanju strategije Evropa 2020;
Emphasises that the provision of accurate, relevant, high-quality statistics is of key importance to sustainable and balanced regional development; notes that precise, accurate data constitute a basis for obtaining detailed information on individual areas such as demographics, the economy and the environment, and that they therefore play a key role in the regional development decision-making process, in particular in the context of Europe 2020 Strategy implementation;
Poročevalka: Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Rapporteur: Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hjusmenova (Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova), Vincenzo Iovine, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Ana Miranda, Jens Nilsson, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Younous Omarjee, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Mihalis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Salvatore Caronna, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Filiz Hakaeva Hyusmenova, Vincenzo Iovine, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Constanze Angela Krehl, Petru Constantin Luhan, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Ana Miranda, Jens Nilsson, Jan Olbrycht, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Younous Omarjee, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michail Tremopoulos, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Sampo Terho, Marianne Thyssen, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Pablo Zalba Bidegain
Burkhard Balz, Sharon Bowles, Udo Bullmann, Pascal Canfin, Nikolaos Chountis, George Sabin Cutaş, Leonardo Domenici, Markus Ferber, Elisa Ferreira, Ildikó Gáll-Pelcz, Jean-Paul Gauzès, Sven Giegold, Sylvie Goulard, Liem Hoang Ngoc, Wolf Klinz, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Philippe Lamberts, Werner Langen, Astrid Lulling, Arlene McCarthy, Juan Andrés Naranjo Escobar, Edward Scicluna, Peter Simon, Peter Skinner, Sampo Terho, Marianne Thyssen, Corien Wortmann-Kool, Pablo Zalba Bidegain
o spremembi Poslovnika zaradi sprememb v odnosih Evropskega parlamenta z institucijami, ki zastopajo nacionalne vlade, po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
on amending the Rules of Procedure to take into account the changing relationships between the European Parliament and the institutions representing the national governments following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty
– ob upoštevanju pisma svojega predsednika z dne 4. marca 2011,
– having regard to the letter from its President of 4 March 2011,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7–0039/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0039/2012 ),
Člen 116 – odstavek 1
Rule 116 – paragraph 1
Parlament na predlog konference predsednikov določi Komisiji na vsakem delnem zasedanju čas za vprašanja.
Question Time with the Commission shall be held at each part-session at times decided by Parliament on a proposal from the Conference of Presidents.
Parlament ima v rednem zakonodajnem postopku in v proračunskem postopku enaka pooblastila kot Svet.
Parliament and the Council have equal powers in the ordinary legislative procedure and in the budget procedure.
Glede na novo institucionalno ravnotežje ni več razloga, da bi se na dnevnem redu ohranjal čas za vprašanja Svetu v sedanji obliki.
Given the new balance between the institutions, there is no longer any reason for the agenda to continue to include Council Question Time in its present form.
Člen 116 – odstavek 2
Rule 116 – paragraph 2
Poslanec lahko na vsakem delnem zasedanju postavi eno vprašanje Komisiji.
No Member may put more than one question to the Commission at any given part-session.
Člen 116 – odstavek 5
Rule 116 – paragraph 5
V skladu s smernicami, ki jih določi konferenca predsednikov, se lahko nameni posebni čas za vprašanja predsedniku Komisije, podpredsedniku Komisije/visokemu predstavniku Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko in predsedniku Evroskupine .
In accordance with guidelines established by the Conference of Presidents, specific question hours may be held with the President of the Commission, with the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and with the President of the Eurogroup.
V skladu s smernicami, ki jih določi konferenca predsednikov, se lahko nameni posebni čas za vprašanja Svetu, predsedniku Komisije, podpredsedniku Komisije/visokemu predstavniku Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko in predsedniku Euroskupine .
In accordance with guidelines established by the Conference of Presidents, specific question hours may be held with the Council, with the President of the Commission, with the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and with the President of the Eurogroup.
Glede na druge pristojnosti Sveta, zlasti pri opredeljevanju politike, pri koordinaciji in izvrševanju, je prav, da se poseben čas nameni za vprašanja tej instituciji.
In view of the Council’s other responsibilities, in particular its policy-making, coordinating and implementing functions, it ought to be possible for specific question hours to be held with the Council.
Priloga II - Del A - odstavek 1 - alinea 2
Annex II – part A – point 1 – indent 2
– če spadajo v pristojnost in na področje odgovornosti Komisije in Sveta ter so splošnega interesa;
– fall within the competence and sphere of responsibility of the Commission and the Council and are of general interest;
– če sodijo v pristojnost in na področje odgovornosti naslovnika ter so splošnega interesa;
– fall within the competence and sphere of responsibility of the addressee and are of general interest;
Priloga II - Del A - odstavek 1 - alinea 2 a (novo)
Annex II – part A – point 1 – indent 2 a (new)
– če zadevajo, kadar gre za vprašanja posebej namenjena Svetu, zlasti izvajanje njegovih nalog opredeljevanja, usklajevanja in izvajanja politik Unije ali njegova pooblastila v postopkih imenovanja ali se nanašajo na delovanje institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije ali spremembo Pogodb.
- concern in particular, in the case of specific questions to the Council, the exercise of its functions in defining, coordinating and implementing EU policies, or concern its powers relating to appointment procedures or the operation of the institutions, agencies and bodies of the European Union or a revision of the Treaties,
Priloga II - Del A - odstavek 2
Annex II – part A – point 2
Vprašanje ni dopustno, če dnevni red že predvideva razpravo o enaki vsebini ob sodelovanju zadevne institucije ali če se nanaša na izvajanje zakonodajnih in proračunskih nalog Sveta iz prvega stavka člena 16(1) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji.
A question shall be inadmissible if the agenda already provides for the subject to be discussed with the participation of the institution concerned , or if it relates to the exercise of the Council’s legislative and budgetary functions referred to in Article 16(1), first sentence, of the Treaty on European Union .
V pismu z dne 4. marca 2011 je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta Odbor za ustavne zadeve zaprosil, naj glede na ugotovitve z razprave konference predsednikov 17. februarja 2011 prouči, ali je potrebno spremeniti poslovnik.
By letter of 4 March 2011, the President of the European Parliament referred to the Committee on Constitutional Affairs a proposal to amend the Rules of Procedure following discussions held in the Conference of Presidents on 17 February 2011.
Med razpravo je konferenca opozorila, da je z uveljavitvijo Lizbonske pogodbe Parlament postal sozakonodajalec Evropske unije z enakimi pooblastili v rednem zakonodajnem in proračunskem postopku, kot jih ima Svet.
During those discussions, the Conference of Presidents pointed out that, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament had become a co-legislator in the EU and that its powers were on a par with those of the Council in the ordinary legislative procedure and in the budget procedure.
Glede na novo institucionalno ravnotežje je konferenca menila, da ni več razloga, da bi na dnevnem redu plenarnega zasedanja ohranjali čas za vprašanja Svetu v sedanji obliki, to je na vsakem zasedanju.
Given this new balance between the institutions, the Conference of Presidents took the view that there was no longer any need for Council Question Time to be included on the agenda every part-session, as is the case at the moment.
Nasprotno pa je konferenca menila, da je treba ohraniti možnost, da se nameni čas za vprašanja ne le predsedniku Komisije, pač pa tudi podpredsednici/visoki predstavnici in predsedniku Euroskupine.
The Conference of Presidents does, however, take the view that question hours with the President of the Commission, the Vice-President/High Representative and the President of the Eurogroup should continue to be an option.
V želji, da bi vprašanje postavili v širši okvir in upoštevali njegovo ustavno razsežnost, je poročevalec za odbor AFCO pripravil delovni dokument, ki analizira, kako so se po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe razvijali odnosi Parlamenta z institucijami, ki zastopajo nacionalne vlade.
In order to place this issue into a broader context, and given its constitutional implications, your rapporteur drafted a working document for the AFCO Committee, analysing the changing relationships between Parliament and the institutions representing the national governments following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty.
Dokument navaja naslednje zaključke: „Z Lizbonsko pogodbo se je precej povečala zakonodajna vloga Parlamenta.
The following conclusions were set out in that document: ‘The Lisbon Treaty significantly increased Parliament’s legislative role.
Vendar so bile s tem dokumentom hkrati oblikovane nove institucije na strani vlad: Evropski svet s stalnim predsednikom, visoki predstavnik in Euroskupina.
At the same time, however, it created new institutions alongside governments: the European Council and its permanent President, the High Representative and the Eurogroup.
Ker so si v zadnjih letih druga za drugo sledile vedno nove krize, je odločanje o glavnih političnih vprašanjih pripadlo prav tem novim institucijam.
Moreover, given the successive crises of recent years, it is these new institutions that have been called on to take major political decisions.
Ob vsem tem pa ima Parlament kot edinega sogovornika le Svet ministrov.
Yet at the same time, the Council of Ministers is Parliament’s only point of contact.
Če se bo tak razvoj potrdil, bi se lahko politični vpliv Parlamenta zmanjšal ravno v trenutku, ko bi morala Unija dokončati svojo demokratično preobrazbo.“
If this trend continues then there is a real risk that Parliament’s political influence will wane at the very time when the Union needs to complete its democratic transformation’.
27. novembra lani se je ob predstavitvi delovnega dokumenta v odboru razvila razprava na to temo.
On 27 November 2011 the working document was submitted to the committee, which then held a debate on the issue.
Po vseh pripravah in razpravi je postalo jasno, da bo zaradi razvoja institucionalnih odnosov v teh zadnjih letih potrebna veliko obsežnejša revizija poslovnika Parlamenta, kot je bila zastavljena na začetku, ko se je omejevala zgolj na spremembo člena 116.
In the light of the preparatory work and the debate, it is clear that, in order for account to be taken of the ways in which the relationships between the institutions have changed over the last few years, any changes to Parliament’s Rules of Procedure will need to be much further reaching than those envisaged in the original referral, which were limited to Rule 116.