natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je sistematično krčenje teh programov druge veje proračunskega programa neupravičeno in da ima negativen učinek na razvoj Evrope za državljane;
Emphasises that the systematic cuts made to these programmes by the other branch of the budgetary authority are unjustified and have a counterproductive effect on the development of a ‘Europe for citizens’;
opozarja na stalen, skoraj neznosen pritisk na financiranje dejavnosti EU kot svetovnega akterja, ki ima omejen manevrski prostor, ujet med nizko postavljene finančne meje in stalno naraščajoče nepredvidene krize v tretjih državah, ter željo, da bi EU uveljavila svoje prednostne naloge in odgovornosti na svetovnem prizorišču; poudarja potrebo po tem, da se Unijo opremi s potrebnimi finančnimi sredstvi za stalen in ustrezen odziv na nepredvidene globalne izzive in zlasti poudarja, da se utegne načrtovan proračun v letu 2011 za politiko SZVOP pokazati za premajhnega; obžaluje, da bi vsako povečanje nad načrtovani okvir pomenilo še večji pritisk na razdelek 4;
Recalls the constant, almost unbearable pressure on the financing of the EU's activities as a global player, with its room for manoeuvre caught between low financial margins, unpredictable and ever increasing crises in third countries and a desire to affirm its priorities and responsibilities on the world stage; underlines the need to equip the Union with the necessary financial means for a consistent and adequate response to unforeseen global challenges and stresses in particular that the programmed CFSP budget for 2011might prove underestimated; regrets that any increase beyond the programmed annual envelope would put further pressure on heading 4;
opozarja na potrebo po reviziji medinstitucionalnega sporazuma iz leta 2006 o proračunski disciplini glede pristojnosti Parlamenta, povezanega s skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko in skupno varnostno in obrambno politiko po Lizbonski pogodbi, vključno s potrebo po novih pravilih za prožno porabo proračuna za skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko za civilne misije skupne varnostne in obrambne politike ter za popolno preglednost nad vojaškimi operacijami kriznega upravljanja, zlasti glede porabe začetnih sredstev;
Points to the need for a revision of the 2006 Inter-Institutional Agreement on budgetary discipline concerning Parliament's prerogatives regarding the CFSP/CSDP budget under the Lisbon Treaty, including the need for new rules on the flexible use of the CFSP budget for civilian CSDP missions and the full transparency over military crisis management operations, in particular the use of the start-up fund;
poudarja, da bo po spremenjenem proračunu za leto 2010, leto 2011 prvo v celoti operativno leto Evropske službe za zunanjepolitično delovanje (EEAS); namerava EEAS zagotoviti potrebna upravna sredstva za opravljanje njenih nalog, zlasti v povezavi z zmogljivostmi za civilno krizno upravljanje, vendar opozarja, da bo skladno s pogodbo in celoti v skladu s skupno namero povečati sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta pri oblikovanju in vodenju zunanjih odnosov EU, polno izvajal svoj nadzor nad proračunom in proračunski nadzor EEAS; spominja, da je treba zagotoviti popolno proračunsko preglednost, povezano s kadrovskim načrtom te službe; poudarja, da bi morala z odpravo nepotrebnih podvajanj nova služba povzročiti ekonomijo obsega; hkrati pa opozarja, da morajo imeti delegacije EU pri multilateralnih organizacijah zadostno število članov;
Points out that, following an amending budget for 2010, 2011 will be the first fully operational year for the European External Action Service (EEAS); intends to provide the EEAS with the necessary administrative means to fulfil its mission, especially with regard to the civil crisis management capabilities, but recalls that, under the treaty and in full accordance with the common intention to increase the EP's involvement in the shaping and management of the EU's external relations, it will fully exercise its scrutiny over the budget and budgetary control of EEAS; recalls that full budgetary transparency regarding the establishment plan of the Service needs to be ensured; emphasises that, via the abolition of unnecessary duplications, the new Service should result in economies of scale; points out, at the same time, that EU Delegations to multilateral organisations must be adequately staffed;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi pomanjkljivih informacij glede financiranja obveznosti EU v podporo državam v razvoju pri njihovem boju proti podnebnim spremembam in opozarja, da večletni finančni okvir ne predvideva teh obveznosti; močno poudarja, da bi morala biti sredstva za te ukrepe dodatek k že obstoječim sredstvom za razvojno pomoč;
Expresses its concerns over the scarcity of information regarding the financing of the EU's commitments to support developing countries in their fight against climate change, and recalls that this commitment was not foreseen in the MFF; strongly emphasises that the funding for these measures should be additional to the existing ODA funds;
ponovno poudarja, da je trdno odločen čim bolj pomagati prebivalcem Haitija pri odpravljanju posledic rušilnega potresa, ki je prizadel njihovo državo; prosi Komisijo, na naj podlagi obsežne analize potreb predloži čim bolj ambiciozen načrt za Haiti; opozarja, da ta načrt ne sme ogroziti obstoječih obvez do drugih držav v razvoju in manj razvitih držav, in da mora vsebovati nove finančne vire; v zvezi s tem še enkrat podaja mnenje Evropskega parlamenta o ustanovitvi stalnih sil civilne zaščite EU in še enkrat poziva Komisijo, naj glede na to oblikuje ustrezne konkretne predloge;
Reaffirms its firm commitment to assist the Haitian people to the largest possible extent in the aftermath of the devastating earthquake that has struck their country; asks the Commission to present, on the basis of an extensive needs assessment, the most ambitious assistance plan possible for Haiti; recalls that such a plan should not jeopardise existing commitments toward other developing and less advanced countries, and should consist of new funding sources; in that context, recalls EP's position on establishing a permanent EU civil protection force and calls once more on the Commission to make concrete proposals accordingly;
poudarja, da EU trenutno poleg obstoječih programov aktivira vse svoje vire, da bi podprla prizadevanja za izgradnjo miru in obnovo na konfliktnih območjih, kot so Gruzija, Afganistan, Bližnji vzhod in Podsaharska Afrika, in meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da bi veljavne prednostne naloge nadomestila z novimi;
Points out that the EU is currently mobilising all its resources, in addition to existing programmes, in order to support peace-building and reconstruction efforts in conflict zones, namely Georgia, Afghanistan, the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa, and that it considers it unacceptable to trade existing priorities for new ones;
spominja na pomen ustreznih finančnih sredstev za stabilizacijo Zahodnega Balkana in za njegovo postopno vključitev v Evropsko unijo;
Recalls the importance of appropriate funding for the stabilisation of the Western Balkans´ region, and for its gradual integration into the European Union;
poudarja, da je vzhodno partnerstvo kot del sosedske politike zelo pomembno za EU in ponovno izraža svojo podporo predlaganemu okviru; meni, da je prav tako pomembno zagotoviti ustrezen finančen okvir, ki bo odražal zavezo EU do svojih južnih sosed;
Emphasises that the Eastern Partnership, as a component of its neighbourhood policy, is of great significance for the EU, and reiterates its support for the proposed framework; considers it equally important to ensure an adequate financial envelope reflecting the EU's commitment vis-à-vis its southern neighbours;
opozarja, da se med usklajevanjem proračuna za leto 2010 ni obravnavalo vprašanje financiranja „spremljevalnih ukrepov za banane“, ki so sledili ženevskemu sporazumu o trgovanju z bananami; ostro nasprotuje predlogu, da bi uporabili omejitve iz razdelka 4 za tako financiranje (25 milijonov EUR letno), česar večletni finančni okvir ne predvideva in meni, da ta postavka zasluži ustrezno večletno rešitev glede financiranja;
Recalls that the issue of the financing of ‘banana accompanying measures’, following the Geneva Agreement on trade on bananas, was not dealt with during the conciliation for the 2010 budget; expresses its strong opposition to the proposal to use heading 4 margins for such financing (EUR 25 million per year), which was not foreseen in the MFF and believes that this item deserves an appropriate multiannual financing solution;
zaradi učinkovite in uspešne porabe sredstev EU želi podrobno oceniti položaj glede tega razdelka, potem ko bo na voljo več informacij o dejanskih zahtevah Komisije, nakazanih stopnjah rasti in celotnega manevrskega prostora v okviru omejitev večletnega finančnega okvirja;
Wishes, in the spirit of effective and efficient spending of EU funds, carefully to evaluate the situation as regards this heading once more information has been provided about the Commission's actual requests, implied growth rates and overall room for manoeuvre under the MFF ceiling;
poudarja potrebo po preglednem in v prihodnost naravnanem pristopu glede številnih zadev, ki imajo velike finančne posledice, kot so kadrovske potrebe, pokojnine, stroškovno in energetsko učinkovita politika stavb, politika zunanjega izvajanja in upravne funkcije in trendi v primerjavi z operativnimi funkcijami in trendi;
Stresses the need to be transparent and forward-looking on a number of issues with major financial implications, such as staffing needs, pensions, a cost and energy efficient building policy, outsourcing policy and administrative versus operational functions and trends;
poudarja, da so se plače in pokojnine po sklepu Sveta decembra 2009 povišale za 1, 85 %, kar pomeni samo polovico od stopnje, ki jo predvideva „metoda“, in da bi, odvisno od izida tožbe, ki sta jo vložila Komisija in Evropski parlament, razlika s povratnim učinkom za vse institucije lahko znašala do približno 135 milijonov EUR;
Points out that, with respect to salaries and pensions, the increase adopted by the Council in December 2009 was 1.85%, i.e. only half of the percentage resulting from the ‘method’, and that, depending on the outcome of the court case resulting from the challenge lodged by the Commission and the European Parliament, the difference, with retroactive effect, could amount to about EUR 135 million across all the institutions;
opozarja, da čeprav je bila napoved rasti Komisije za leto 2010 omejena na 0,9 %, ni zajela številnih upravnih področjih, ki se dejansko ne financirajo iz tega razdelka, kot so vrstice o tehnični in administrativni podpori (nekdanje vrstice BA), izvajalske agencije (izven raziskovalnih agencij) in upravni odhodki za decentralizirane agencije ter neposredne in posredne raziskave; poziva Komisijo, naj poda svoje mnenje o kriterijih, ki jih je treba upoštevati pri določitvi celotnih upravnih odhodkov, in naj še naprej zagotavlja jasne opise teh področij izven razdelka 5; zahteva, da se vsi upravni odhodki vključijo v razdelek 5;
Recalls that, although the Commission's growth forecast for 2010 was limited to 0.9%, it did not include a number of administrative areas that are in fact financed outside this heading, such as technical and administrative support lines (ex-BA lines), executive agencies (outside research agencies) and administrative expenditure on decentralised agencies and direct and indirect research; asks the Commission to state its view as to the criteria to be applied in order to define total administrative expenditure, and to continue to provide a clear description of those areas outside heading 5; requests that all administrative expenditure must be included in heading 5;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži posodobljeno različico „poročila o pregledu“, ki bo omogočila jasno analizo in nadaljnje ukrepanje glede kadrovskih potreb;
Calls on the Commission to present an update of the ‘screening report’ with a view to clear analysis and follow-up of staffing needs;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj za financiranje decentraliziranih agencij nadaljuje s politiko zadnjih proračunskih let, zlasti tako, da pri odločanju glede predloga za subvencije upošteva presežke, nastale zaradi izvrševanja njihovih proračunov; kljub temu znova poudarja, da je treba agencijam, ki so deloma odvisne od prihodkov od pristojbin, vseeno omogočiti široko uporabo namenskih prejemkov, kar jim bo dalo potrebno proračunsko prilagodljivost; pozdravlja pregledno predstavitev zahtevkov za letne subvencije v delovnem dokumentu za organe, ki jih navaja člen 185 Uredbe Sveta (EC Euratom) št. 1605/2002, ki se priloži predlogu proračuna Komisije;
Encourages the Commission to continue the policy followed in recent budgetary exercises as regards the financing of decentralised agencies, notably by taking into consideration the surpluses resulting from the implementation of their budgets when deciding on the subsidies to be proposed; insists, however, that those agencies which depend to some extent on revenue generated by fees should still be able to make extensive use of assigned revenues, so as to give them the budgetary flexibility they need; welcomes the transparent presentation of the annual subsidies requested in a working document on the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 to accompany the Commission's draft budget;
70. pričakuje, da bo medinstitucionalna delovna skupina za decentralizirane agencije brez odlašanja znova začela s svojimi aktivnostmi in ponovno poudarja, da od te skupine pričakuje, da ji bo uspelo sprejeti operativne sklepe, ki bodo institucijam omogočale dogovor o skupnem pristopu k ustanovitvi, vodenju in financiranju decentraliziranih agencij ter o njihovi umestitvi v institucionalno okolje Unije;
70.Expects the activities of the interinstitutional working group on decentralised agencies to be resumed promptly, and reaffirms its expectation that this group will manage to produce operative conclusions allowing the institutions to agree on a common approach to the establishment, management and financing of decentralised agencies, as well as their place in the institutional landscape of the Union;
poudarja, da bo proračunski postopek za sprejem proračuna za leto 2011 prvi, ki bo v celoti potekal po novih pravilih iz Lizbonske pogodbe; spominja, da so se Evropski parlament, Svet in Komisija dogovorili o prehodnih ukrepih za proračunske postopke po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe
Stresses that the budgetary procedure for the adoption of the 2011 budget will be the first one entirely run under the new rules defined in the Treaty of Lisbon; recalls that the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agreed on transitory measures applicable to the budgetary procedure after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty See Annex 5 to European Parliament resolution of 17 December 2009 on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010 as modified by the Council (all sections).
; naroča svojemu Odboru za proračun, naj se pogaja o teh načelih s Svetom in Komisijo;
; instructs its Committee on Budgets to negotiate these principles with the Council and the Commission;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu in Računskemu sodišču.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the Court of Auditors.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2010 o smernicah za proračunski postopek 2011, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov ( 2010/2003(BUD) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2010 on the guidelines for the 2011 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor ( 2010/2003(BUD) )
ob upoštevanju člena 314 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
having regard to Article 314 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
ob upoštevanju petega poročila generalnih sekretarjev institucij o razvojnih smernicah razdelka 5 finančne perspektive iz maja 2009,
having regard to the sixth report by the Secretaries-General of the institutions on trends in heading 5 of the financial perspective, as revised in autumn 2009,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2008, skupaj z odgovori institucij UL C 269, 10.11.2009, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget concerning the financial year 2008, together with the institutions‘ replies OJ C 269, 10.11.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0036/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0036/2010 ),
ker Evropski parlament na tej stopnji letnega postopka čaka na načrte odhodkov drugih institucij in predloge svojega predsedstva za proračun za leto 2011,
whereas, at this stage of the annual procedure, the European Parliament is awaiting the other institutions‘ estimates and its own Bureau's proposals for the 2011 budget,
ker je koristno, da se poskusni projekt okrepljenega sodelovanja in odnosov med predsedstvom in Odborom za proračun nadaljuje tudi v tretjem letu, med celotnim proračunskim postopkom za leto 2011,
whereas it is useful to continue the pilot exercise on enhanced cooperation and relations between the Bureau and the Committee on Budgets for a third year, throughout the 2011 budget procedure,
ker zgornja meja razdelka 5 za leto 2011 znaša 8.415.000.000 EUR (povečanje za 327.000.000 EUR ali 4 % v primerjavi z letom 2010, vključno z upoštevanjem dvoodstotne inflacije),
whereas the ceiling for heading 5 in 2011 is EUR 8 415 000 000 (representing an increase of EUR 327 000 000, or 4%, compared with 2010, including 2% for inflation),
ker proračun Evropskega parlamenta za leto 2010 znaša 1.607.363.235 EUR, kar pomeni 19,87 % razdelka 5 za to leto pred revizijo večletnega finančnega okvira 2007–2013, s katero je bila zgornja meja razdelka 5 znižana za 126.000.000 EUR, da bi prispevali k financiranju evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva, po tej reviziji pa znaša 20,19 %;
whereas the European Parliament's budget for 2010 amounts to EUR 1 607 363 235, representing 19.87% of heading 5 for this year before the revision of the 2007-2013 MFF (which lowered the ceiling of heading 5 by EUR 126 000 000 in order to contribute to the financing of the European Economic Recovery Plan), and 20.19% after that revision,
ker je treba upoštevati, kako so se razvijali deleži odhodkov institucij v razdelku 5, in različne razloge za občutne spremembe, kot so začetek veljavnosti nekaterih pogodb (s čimer se je povečalo število poslancev oziroma so se povečale naloge in pristojnosti institucij), širitev ter druge odločitve, ki imajo za posledico pomenljivo povečanje odhodkov, ki ni bilo predvideno ob sprejemanju finančnega okvira,
whereas account needs to be taken of how each institution's share of heading 5 expenditure has evolved, and of the various reasons for significant modifications, such as the entry into force of different treaties (increasing the number of Members and/or extending the different institutions‘ tasks and competences), enlargement and other decisions entailing significant expenditure increases not foreseen at the time the financial framework was adopted,
ker bo začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe v različnem obsegu imel finančne posledice za vse institucije, skupen obseg teh posledic pa je še vedno neznan,
whereas the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty will, to varying degrees, have financial implications for all the institutions, the overall magnitude of which is still unknown,
ker je bistvenega pomena, da se pozorno spremlja položaj v razdelku 5 med izvrševanjem proračuna za leto 2010 ter med pripravami na sprejetje proračuna za leto 2011,
whereas it is essential to monitor the situation with regard to heading 5 carefully throughout the implementation of the 2010 budget and in the run-up to the adoption of the 2011 budget,
ker je treba posebej upoštevati finančni učinek na pokojninske sisteme, demografska gibanja v zvezi s staranjem prebivalstva in upokojevanjem, zaposlovanje ter druga področja, povezana s statutarnimi določbami, in ker je treba zagotoviti dolgoročno stabilnost,
whereas particular account should be taken of the financial impact on pension systems, age-related trends and retirement, recruitment and other areas related to statutory provisions, and of the need to ensure long-term sustainability,
poudarja, da bo začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, namreč ena sama obravnava vsake od dveh vej proračunskega organa, ki ji sledi usklajevanje za pripravo dokončnega proračuna, zahteval še tesnejše sodelovanje in dialog med vsemi institucijami med celotnim postopkom, vključno s pravočasno predstavitvijo stvarnega načrta prihodkov in odhodkov;
Points out that the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, notably the single budget reading by each of the two arms of the budgetary authority, followed by a conciliation meeting with a view to arriving at a final budget, will require even closer cooperation and dialogue among all the institutions throughout the whole procedure, including the presentation of realistic estimates in due time;
poudarja, da so okoliščine, v katerih bosta sprejeta proračun za leto 2010 in proračun za leto 2011, precej izjemne in pomenijo izziv, saj je na eni strani uspešno izvajanje Lizbonske pogodbe glavna prednostna naloga, ki bo zahtevna tudi v finančnem smislu, medtem ko so na drugi strani učinki finančne krize v številnih državah članicah še vedno zelo močni, zaradi česar prihaja do politične dileme na ravni EU; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da proračun EU predstavlja manj kot 2,5 % vseh javnih izdatkov EU; ugotavlja tudi, da razdelek 5 proračuna EU tako ustreza 0,14 % javnih izdatkov celotne EU;
Points out that the circumstances under which the 2010 and 2011 budgets will be adopted are quite exceptional and challenging, since, on the one hand, successful implementation of the Lisbon Treaty is a major priority that will also be challenging financially, while, on the other hand, the effects of the financial crisis are still very present in many Member States, resulting in a political dilemma at EU level; recalls, in this context, that the EU budget represents less than 2.5% of total EU public expenditure; notes, furthermore, that heading 5 of the EU budget consequently corresponds to 0.14% of EU-wide public spending;
opozarja na težaven položaj v zvezi z zgornjo mejo odhodkov razdelka 5 za leto 2011 in se zaveda dejstva, da bodo institucije lahko naletele na težave pri usklajevanju financiranja vseh potreb in želje po ohranitvi proračunske discipline ter samodiscipline zaradi spoštovanja večletnega finančnega okvira; ugotavlja, da se veliko upravnih področij ne financira iz razdelka 5; zahteva, da se vsi upravni odhodki vključijo v ta razdelek in da se zgornja meja temu ustrezno prilagodi;
Underlines the difficult situation with respect to the heading 5 expenditure ceiling for 2011, and is aware that the institutions may encounter problems in reconciling the financing of all needs with their desire to maintain budgetary discipline and self-restraint in order to comply with the multiannual financial framework; notes that a number of administrative areas are financed outside heading 5; requests that all administrative expenditure be included in that heading, and that the ceiling be revised accordingly;
zato vztraja, da je treba pred dokončnim sprejetjem odločitev pozorno spremljati potek dogodkov; ponovno poudarja svoje prepričanje, da bo treba določiti prednostne naloge in dati prednost glavnim dejavnostim;
Insists, therefore, that developments be monitored closely before final decisions are taken; reiterates its belief that priorities will have to be set and that core activities should be prioritised;