natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Yannick Jadot, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Markus Pieper, Algirdas Saudargas
Matthias Groote, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Yannick Jadot, Oriol Junqueras Vies, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Markus Pieper, Algirdas Saudargas
A. ker direktiva o varstvu podatkov (95/46/ES) in direktiva EU o telekomunikacijskem svežnju (2009/140/ES) omogočata prost pretok osebnih podatkov na notranjem trgu;
A. whereas the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC and the EU Telecoms Package Directive 2009/140/EC make possible the free flow of personal data within the internal market;
B. ker je na internetu vedno več družabnih omrežij vseh vrst, ki jim predvsem mladi ljudje dajejo svoje osebne podatke;
B. whereas social networking sites of all types are spreading rapidly on the internet, and young people in particular divulge personal data on these,
C. ker temeljna načela Direktive 1995/46/ES ostajajo veljavna, globalizacija in hiter tehnološki razvoj pa prinašata nove izzive glede varstva osebnih podatkov, saj se je povečalo zaupanje v kompleksna informacijska orodja za obdelavo podatkov, povečala pa se je tudi spletna dejavnost, med drugim tudi e-trgovanje, e-zdravstvo, e-uprava, vse večja uporaba socialnih omrežij, razvoj spletnega vedenjskega oglaševanja ali računalništva v oblaku;
C. whereas the core principles of the 1995/46/EC Directive remain valid, globalisation and rapid technological developments have brought new challenges in terms of personal data protection as a result of the increased reliance on complex information technology tools for data processing as well as enhanced online activity, including e-commerce, e-health, e-government, the increasing use of social networks, the development of online behavioural advertising, or cloud computing,
D. ker je zaradi vse večje izmenjave osebnih podatkov posameznikov v kombinaciji s tehnološkim razvojem prišlo do porasta zbiranja, shranjevanja in uporabe osebnih podatkov ter se zastavlja vprašanje določitve prava, ki naj se uporablja, in opredelitve odgovornosti vseh zainteresiranih strani glede izvajanja zakonodaje EU o varstvu podatkov (npr. osebne podatke državljanov EU obdeluje podjetje s sedežem zunaj ozemlja Unije, zunaj ozemlja Unije pa so tudi njegovi pogodbeni podizvajalci);
D. whereas the increasing exchange of individuals’ personal data combined with new technological developments have led to a rise in personal data collection, storage and use, and raise the issue of determining the applicable law and defining the responsibilities of all interested parties in terms of implementation of EU data protection legislation (e.g. a firm dealing with EU citizens’ personal data, whose headquarters are located outside the EU territory, and which is subcontracting to firms also located outside the EU territory),
E. ker bi morala revizija Direktive 95/46/ES o varstvu podatkov zajeti celovito reformo okvira EU za pravo s področja varstva podatkov in določiti strožja pravila glede zbiranja podatkov, zlasti tako, da se posameznika obvesti, zakaj in kako dolgo se bodo njegovi podatki zbirali in uporabljali ter kdo jih bo zbiral in uporabljal, in sicer v spletnem okolju, pa tudi izven njega;
E. whereas the revision of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC should comprise an overarching reform of the EU framework for data protection law, laying out more stringent rules with regards to the collection of data, notably by informing the individual why, by whom and for how long his or her data will be collected and used, this both within the online as well as the offline environment,
F. ker državljani na spletu ne kupujejo enako varno kot zunaj spleta, to pa zaradi strahu pred krajo identitete in premajhne preglednosti nad tem, kako bodo njihovi osebni podatki obdelani in uporabljeni;
F. whereas citizens do not shop online with the same security as they do offline, due to fears of identity theft and lack of transparency as to how their personal information will be processed and used,
G. ker se vedno pogosteje uporabljajo kartice zvestobe (klubske kartice, kartice popustov oziroma kartice ugodnosti) podjetij in trgovin, ki se uporabljajo ali bi se lahko uporabljale za pripravo profilov strank;
G. whereas loyalty cards (e.g. club cards, discount cards or advantage cards) are being used more and more frequently by companies and in commerce, and are, or can be, used for customer profiling,
2. meni, da se pravila EU o varstvu podatkov po Uniji izvajajo neenotno in razdrobljeno, kar škodljivo vpliva na temeljne pravice in svoboščine posameznikov glede varovanja podatkov in zasebnosti, na pravno varnost in jasnost v pogodbenih razmerjih, razvoj e-trgovine in e-podjetništva, zaupanje potrošnikov v sistem, čezmejne transakcije in vzpostavitev resnično enakih pogojev za podjetja in MSP na enotnem trgu;
Believes that the implementation of EU data protection rules remains uneven and fragmented throughout the EU, consequently having an adverse effect on individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms with regards to data protection and privacy, legal security and clarity in contractual relations, the development of e-commerce and e-business, consumer trust in the system, cross border transactions and the realisation of a truly level playing field for businesses and SMEs within the Single Market;
5. poziva zlasti, naj se pravila o varstvu podatkov uskladijo s temeljnimi načeli direktive o e-zasebnosti na vseh področjih varstva podatkov, da bi s tem preprečili razdrobljen pristop;
Calls in particular for the alignment of the data protection rules to the basic principles of the e-privacy Directive in all areas of data protection in order to avoid a fragmented approach;
7. meni, da so vsi osebni podatki in informacije, ki krožijo med različnimi centri za stike in znotraj informacijskega sistema notranjega trga (IMI), obdelani, uporabljeni in zbrani zgolj v zakonite namene in da imamo potrebne zaščitne ukrepe proti njihovi zlorabi;
Is of the opinion that any personal data and information circulated among the different Points of Single Contact and within the Internal Market Information system (IMI) are solely processed, used and collected for legitimate purposes and that necessary safeguards against abuse are put into place;
14. poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni pravila v zvezi s pravom, ki se uporablja na področju varstva osebnih podatkov, saj je zaradi globalizacije izmenjav vse težje določiti odgovornost zainteresiranih strani; poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti pravno varnost za upravljavce podatkov in preprečiti vrzeli v varstvu osebnih podatkov iz Direktive 95/46/ES;
Calls on the Commission to clarify the rules related to applicable law in the field of personal data protection, as it has become increasingly difficult to determine interested parties’ responsibilities given the globalisation of exchanges; underlines that it is necessary to ensure legal certainty for data controllers and avoid loopholes in the protection of personal data provided by Directive 95/46/EC;
19. poudarja, da je za imetnike osebnih podatkov pomembno, da se imenuje upravljavec osebnih podatkov z jasno opredeljeno vlogo; meni, da bi morale biti organizacije, ki delujejo na enotnem trgu, sposobne imenovati upravljavca osebnih podatkov za svoje dejavnosti v EU;
Emphasises the importance, for the holders of personal data, to appoint one data protection controller with a clearly identified role; considers that organisations operating in the Single Market should be able to appoint a data protection controller for their EU activities;
22. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči načine dostopa, popravka in izbrisa podatkov, pa tudi uporabo alternativnega reševanja sporov na notranjem trgu, zlasti v spletnem okolju, in poudarja potrebo po primerni politiki glede kršitev;
Calls on the Commission to examine the modalities for access, rectification and deletion of data, as well as recourse to Alternative Dispute Resolution in the internal market; especially in the online environment; and, stresses the need for a proper infringement policy;
24. vztraja, da je treba spodbujati uporabo tehnologije za boljše varovanje zasebnosti in izvajati načelo vgrajene zasebnosti, da bodo vprašanja zasebnosti vključena v prihodnji tehnološki razvoj; poziva Komisijo, naj ponudnike tehnologij spodbuja, da bodo v razvoj in širjenje tehnologij vključili bistvena načela varovanja zasebnosti, med njimi manjšo količino podatkov, preglednost in nadzor uporabnikov, da bo na celotnem enotnem trgu zagotovljena visoka raven varstva osebnih podatkov;
Insists on the need to promote the use of Privacy Enhancing Technologies and to implement the principle of Privacy by Design to ensure that privacy issues are included in future technological developments; Calls on the Commission to encourage technology providers to integrate core privacy principles, including data minimisation, transparency and user control, into the development and deployment of technologies in order to guarantee a high level of protection of personal data throughout the Single Market ;
Sistem naj bi bil zasnovan tako, da podjetij, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij, ne bi po nepotrebnem obremenjeval z dragimi in birokratskimi obveznostmi, ki bi odvračale sodelovanje.
It should be structured in a way that avoids unduly burdening companies – and particularly SMEs – with costly and bureaucratic obligations which could discourage participation.
Biti bi moral nevtralen glede tehnologije in tak, da bi ga bilo možno prepoznavati globalno, ter cenovno sprejemljiv, da ne bi bilo ovir že pred vstopom vanj.
The scheme should be neutral to technology, capable of being recognised globally and affordable so as not to create barriers to entry;
31. meni, da razvoj in pospeševanje samoregulativne pobude lahko izboljša sedanji okvir o varstvu podatkov, čeprav pobuda ne more nadomestiti zakonodajnih ukrepov, zlasti ne glede dejanskega izvrševanja predpisov; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj tako pobudo spodbujajo in razvijejo ter podprejo instrumente, ki bodo naredili dogovore o samoregulaciji bolj privlačne za podjetja,
Considers that the development and promotion of self-regulatory initiatives can improve the current framework for data protection, though they cannot take the place of legislative measures, especially in terms of enforcement; calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage such initiative and to develop and support instruments that make it more attractive for business to agree on self-regulation;
36. poziva Komisijo, naj ohrani sedanje izjeme in odstopanja iz člena 9 Direktive 95/46/ES, ki veljajo za nekatera pravila o varstvu podatkov v novinarske namene, da se v EU ohranijo svobodni in neodvisni mediji, in za namen umetniškega in literarnega izražanja v podporo ustvarjalnosti;
Calls on the Commission to maintain the current exemptions and derogations provided by Article 9 of Directive 95/46/EC from certain data protection rules for journalistic purposes to safeguard free and independent media in the EU, and for the purpose of artistic or literary expression to support creativity;
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża, grofica Thun Und Hohenstein (Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein), Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Christian Engström, Evelyne Gebhardt, Louis Grech, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Philippe Juvin, Sandra Kalniete, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Kurt Lechner, Toine Manders, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Zuzana Roithová, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Eva-Britt Svensson, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Emilie Turunen, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Olle Schmidt
Ashley Fox, María Irigoyen Pérez, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Olle Schmidt
UL L 201, 31.07.2002, str.
OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p.
37. , da se zagotovi pravna varnost na digitalnem enotnem trgu in omogoči učinkovitejše varstvo podatkov;
37. , to ensure legal certainty in the digital single market, so as to facilitate more effective data protection;
5. poudarja, da osebni podatki o zaposlitvenem statusu uporabnika, ki se sporočijo delodajalcu, ne smejo biti objavljeni ali posredovani tretji stranki brez predhodnega dovoljenja zadevne osebe;
Stresses that personal data communicated to the employer and concerning the user’s professional situation should not be published or forwarded to third parties without the prior permission of the person concerned;
Varstvo podatkov za otroke in mladoletnike
Data protection for children and minors
9. zato države članice poziva, naj vzgojo o uporabi medijev vključijo kot obvezni predmet v učne načrte šol in izobraževalne programe drugih šolskih ustanov, tudi predšolskih, in naj učiteljem in vzgojiteljem ponudijo ustrezne možnosti izobraževanja in usposabljanja;
Therefore calls on the Member States to include instruction in media use as an integral part of the curriculum in schools and other educational establishments, including infant schools, and to offer teachers and educators appropriate opportunities for training and further training;
12. meni, da je treba pri zbiranju in obdelavi podatkov o učencih ali udeležencih izobraževanja v drugih izobraževalnih ustanovah ravnati skrbno, podatke pa širiti le po privolitvi in ob upoštevanju največjega interesa prizadetih otrok;
In collecting and processing data regarding school pupils or those attending other educational establishments, due care must be exercised and the data should only be shared after consent has been given, while respecting the paramount interests of the children concerned;
14. spodbuja Komisijo in države članice, naj organizirajo kampanje za ozaveščanje javnosti, ki bi bile namenjene mladoletnikom, zlasti otrokom in njihovim skrbnikom, in ki bi poudarjale tveganje, ki ga spletno okolje predstavlja za njihovo zasebnost, in kaj lahko storijo, da se zaščitijo in prevzamejo lastno odgovornost; opozarja, da morajo biti take informacije predstavljene na razumljiv in pregleden način; ta zahteva bi morala posebej veljati za formulacijo besedil, ki so podlaga za izrecno privolitev v uporabo podatkov;
Encourages the Commission and the Member States to organise public awareness campaigns aimed at minors, and in particular children and their carers, highlighting the risks to their privacy in the online environment, the steps they can take to protect themselves and the need to take their own responsibility; stresses that such information must be provided in a clear and comprehensible form; this requirement should apply in particular to the formulation of texts which provide the basis for specific consent to the use of data;
31. , ki je nujen pogoj za izvajanje novinarske dejavnosti v vse bolj celovitem tehnološkem medijskem okolju in za izpolnitev vloge medijev v demokratičnih družbah;
31. which is a necessary prerequisite for the exercise of journalistic activities in an increasingly complex technological media environment and for the fulfilment of the media’s role in democratic societies.
o celovitem pristopu k varstvu osebnih podatkov v Evropski uniji
on a comprehensive approach to personal data protection in the European Union
Odbor za pravne zadeve poziva Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve kot pristojni odbor, da v svoj predlog resolucije vključi naslednje pobude:
The Committee on Legal Affairs calls on the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, as the committee responsible, to incorporate the following suggestions in its motion for a resolution:
2. meni, da je zaradi vse večje zapletenosti vprašanja varstva podatkov in sedanje neusklajenosti med nacionalnimi predpisi držav članic treba sprejeti celostni pravni instrument na evropski ravni; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi sistem obveščanja o kršitvah varnosti podatkov, podobno kot ga za telekomunikacijski sektor uvaja direktiva o e-zasebnosti;
Considers that this increasing complexity of data protection issues and the current lack of harmonisation between Member States’ national laws call for the adoption of a comprehensive legal instrument at European level; calls, in this connection, on the Commission to establish a personal data breach notification system along the lines of that introduced by the ePrivacy Directive regarding the telecommunications sector;
4. poudarja, da pravica dostopa ne vključuje le popolnega dostopa posameznika do postopkov obdelave podatkov o njem, vključno z virom in prejemniki, temveč tudi razumljive informacije o poteku avtomatizirane obdelave; opozarja, da bo to postalo še bolj pomembno zaradi profiliranja in rudarjenja podatkov;
Stresses that the right of access covers not only full access to data processes affecting the data subject, including the source and recipients, but also intelligible information about the logic involved in any automatic processing; emphasises that the latter will become even more important with profiling and data-mining;
8. podpira uvedbo splošnega načela preglednosti za obdelavo osebnih podatkov, kar bo posamezniku olajšalo preverjanje podatkov o njem;
Maintains that transparency should be established as the general principle governing the processing of personal data, as this would make it easier for individual data subjects to check their own data;
11. pozdravlja odločitev Komisije, da bo preučila možnosti za uvedbo splošne obveznosti obveščanja o kršitvah varstva osebnih podatkov, ki je sedaj omejena na področje telekomunikacij;
Welcomes the Commission’s decision to consider how a personal data breach notification requirement might be established on a general basis, bearing in mind that such a requirement at present applies to the telecommunications sector only;
17. zelo podpira sporočilo Komisije in poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo nacionalni organi, pristojni za varstvo podatkov, ustrezno pooblaščeni in bodo imeli sredstva, ki jim bodo omogočala ustrezno izvajanje nalog na nacionalni ravni ter zagotavljala neodvisnost;
Strongly endorses the Commission communication and asks the Member States to ensure that national data protection authorities are provided with appropriate powers and own resources allowing them to properly perform their tasks at the national level and to guarantee their independence;
26. poziva Komisijo, naj vse zainteresirane strani na internetu ozavesti o vprašanju osebnih podatkov, in zlasti zahteva, da oglaševalska podjetja in izdajatelji spletnih strani pred kakršnim koli zbiranjem podatkov o uporabnikih interneta slednje o tem obvestijo.
Calls on the Commission to ensure that all internet operators assume their responsibilities with regard to data protection, and urges advertising space agencies and publishers to clearly inform internet users in advance about the collection of any data relating to them.
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Syed Kamall, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimiter Stojanov (Dimitar Stoyanov), Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Zbigniew Ziobro, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Raffaele Baldassarre, Luigi Berlinguer, Sebastian Valentin Bodu, Françoise Castex, Christian Engström, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Syed Kamall, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, Antonio Masip Hidalgo, Jiří Maštálka, Alajos Mészáros, Bernhard Rapkay, Evelyn Regner, Francesco Enrico Speroni, Dimitar Stoyanov, Alexandra Thein, Diana Wallis, Rainer Wieland, Cecilia Wikström, Zbigniew Ziobro, Tadeusz Zwiefka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, baronica Sarah Ludford, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolau (Georgios Papanikolaou), Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Jan Philipp Albrecht, Rita Borsellino, Simon Busuttil, Carlos Coelho, Rosario Crocetta, Cornelis de Jong, Agustín Díaz de Mera García Consuegra, Cornelia Ernst, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Kinga Göncz, Nathalie Griesbeck, Sylvie Guillaume, Ágnes Hankiss, Anna Hedh, Salvatore Iacolino, Sophia in ‘t Veld, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Timothy Kirkhope, Juan Fernando López Aguilar, Baroness Sarah Ludford, Clemente Mastella, Véronique Mathieu, Claude Moraes, Jan Mulder, Georgios Papanikolaou, Judith Sargentini, Birgit Sippel, Csaba Sógor, Rui Tavares, Wim van de Camp, Daniël van der Stoep, Axel Voss, Renate Weber, Tatjana Ždanoka
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Stavros Lambrinidis, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Norica Nicolai, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
Edit Bauer, Michael Cashman, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Ioan Enciu, Heidi Hautala, Stavros Lambrinidis, Mariya Nedelcheva, Norica Nicolai, Zuzana Roithová, Michèle Striffler, Cecilia Wikström
o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov (člen 104(7)) za leti 2009 in 2010
on public access to documents (Rule 104(7)) for the years 2009-2010
– ob upoštevanju členov 1, 10 in 16 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU) in členov 15 in 298 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to Articles 1, 10 and 16 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and to Articles 15 and 298 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 30. maja 2001 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1367/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. septembra 2006 o uporabi določb aarhuške konvencije o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah v institucijah in organih Skupnosti
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies
UL L 264, 25.9.2006, str.
OJ L 264, 25.9.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije in Splošnega sodišča o dostopu do dokumentov, še zlasti sodb Sodišča v zadevah Turco (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P)
– having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the General Court on access to documents, and notably to the judgments of the Court in the cases of Turco (joined cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P)
I-4723. , Bavarian Lager (zadeva C-28/08)
I-4723. , Bavarian Lager (case C-28/08)