natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je teritorialna kohezija poseben koncept, ki ekonomski in socialni koheziji daje izrazito oprijemljivo dodano vrednost ter omogoča odziv na čedalje večje izzive, s katerimi se soočajo regije EU; poudarja, da se morajo tri komponente kohezije (ekonomska, socialna in teritorialna) dopolnjevati in medsebojno krepiti, obenem pa ohraniti vsaka svojo nalogo v okviru enotne celovite zasnove; zato meni, da noben od teh ciljev ne sme biti pomembnejši od drugega oziroma da se med njimi ne sme izbirati; poudarja, da je treba teritorialno kohezijo vključiti v obstoječi okvir, ne da bi postala kohezijska politika EU zaradi tega sektorsko razdrobljena;
Believes that territorial cohesion is a distinct concept, which provides tangible added value to economic and social cohesion and a solution to the growing challenges of the EU regions; stresses that the three component parts of cohesion (economic, social and territorial) should be complementary and mutually reinforcing, while maintaining distinct objectives within a single integrated concept; considers, therefore, that there must be no hierarchy or trade-off between those component parts; stresses that territorial cohesion should be introduced into the existing framework without causing the sectoral fragmentation of the EU cohesion policy;
pozdravlja ugotovitve poročila ESPON o prihodnjih razvojnih scenarijih za evropsko ozemlje do leta 2030, kjer so predstavljeni otipljivi podatki, ki podpirajo politično razpravo o oblikovanju politike EU in nacionalnih politik, da bi ustvarili ustrezneinstrumente za sprejemanje novih izzivov, ki imajo velik lokalni ali regionalni vpliv, kot so demografske spremembe, koncentracija prebivalstva v mestih, migracije in podnebne spremembe, ter ustvarili optimalne razmere za kakovostno življenje državljanov;
Welcomes the conclusions of the ESPON report on future development scenarios for the European territory until 2030, which bring tangible data in support of the policy debate on the shape of EU and national policies, in orders to create the right instruments to meet new challenges having a major local or regional impact such as demographic change, urban concentration, migratory movements, and climate change, and to develop optimal conditions for a good quality of life for their citizens;
poudarja, da je eden glavnih ciljev teritorialne kohezije omogočiti, da bosta napredek in rast na posameznem ozemlju prinesla koristi za vso regijo in ozemlje Evropske unije; glede tega meni, da lahko centri odličnosti in grozdi za raziskave in inovacije omogočajo gospodarsko uspešnost, znanstvena odkritja, tehnološke inovacije, delovna mesta in regionalni razvoj, ter poziva h krepitvi sodelovanja in izmenjave znanja med temi centri, univerzami, poslovnimi združenji in posameznimi podjetji, tudi z najmanjšimi; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi presojo vplivov grozdov in centrov odličnosti na okolje;
Emphasises that one of the main objectives of territorial cohesion is to ensure that progress and growth generated in one specific territory should provide benefits for the whole region and across the territory of the European Union; considers, in this respect, that excellence centres and clusters of research and innovation may be one way of ensuring economic success, scientific discovery, technological innovation, jobs and regional development, and calls for the strengthening of interaction and knowledge transfer between those centres, universities, business organisations and individual businesses, including the smallest; calls on the Commission to present an impact assessment analysing the effect of clusters and excellence centres on surrounding areas;
poudarja, da koncept teritorialne kohezije zajema tudi kohezijo na posameznih ozemljih, ter predlaga, naj se prednost nameni vsem politikam, ki spodbujajo resnično policentričen razvoj območij, da bi se tako zmanjšal pritisk na glavna mesta in spodbudil nastanek novih zgostitvenih območij; ugotavlja, da je treba na ta način tudi kljubovati negativnemu vplivu koncentracije na mesta, kot so prometni zastoji, onesnaževanje, socialna izključenost ali revščina, ali posledične nenadzorovane urbanizacije na kakovost življenja njihovih prebivalcev; meni, da se pri tem ne sme spregledati podpore podeželju in pomembne vloge, ki jo tu imajo mala in srednje velika mesta;
Emphasises that the concept of territorial cohesion also embraces cohesion within territories and proposes that priority be given to any policies that promote a genuinely polycentric development of territories, in order to lessen the pressures on capital cities and encourage the emergence of secondary poles; notes that this should also be a way to counter the negative effects of concentration for cities, such as congestion, pollution, social exclusion and poverty, or the subsequent uncontrolled urbanisation that affect the quality of life of citizens living there; considers that support for rural areas and the important role played by small and medium-sized towns located in rural areas should not be overlooked in that regard;
poudarja, da notranji trg odločilno prispeva k ustvarjanju ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije; poudarja, da so javne storitve pomembne za trajnosten gospodarski in družbeni razvoj, pa tudi, da je potreben socialno in regionalno pravičen dostop do storitev splošnega pomena, zlasti javnega šolstva in zdravstvenih storitev; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da zagotavljanje pravičnega dostopa ni zgolj vprašanje geografske razdalje, temveč da sta pri tem pomembni tudi razpoložljivost in dostopnost teh storitev, ter meni, da bi morali biti v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti in konkurenčnim pravom Skupnosti za opredeljevanje, organizacijo, financiranje in spremljanje teh storitev pristojni nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi; obenem pa tudi meni, da je treba v razpravo o teritorialni koheziji vključiti pravičen dostop do storitev za državljane;
Emphasises the vital contribution of the internal market to economic, social and territorial cohesion; stresses the importance of public services in relation to sustainable economic and social development as well as the need for socially and regionally equitable access to services of general interest, in particular education and health services; emphasises, in this respect, that guaranteeing 'equitable access' does not simply involve geographical distance but also availability and accessibility of those services and takes the view, in light of the principle of subsidiarity and of EC competition law, that responsibility for defining, organising, financing and monitoring services of general interest should rest with the national, regional and local authorities; considers, however, that a reflection on the equitable access for citizens to services should be included in the debate on the territorial cohesion;
ugotavlja, da Komisija v zeleni knjigi priznava ogromne razvojne izzive treh vrst regij z geografskimi posebnostmi: gorskih, otoških in redko poseljenih regij; meni, da se politika teritorialne kohezije ne bi smela osredotočati le na regije z geografskimi omejitvami, ne da bi podcenjeval pomembno vlogo teritorialne kohezije pri odpravljanju težav, s katerimi se te regije soočajo; vendar meni, da je treba zlasti preučiti možnosti, kako te omejitve odpraviti in tem regijam omogočiti, da bodo svoj potencial spremenile v prostorske vrednosti in resnične priložnosti, ter s tem spodbuditi njihov razvoj, kar je izrednega pomena za Evropsko unijo kot celoto;
Notes that the Green Paper acknowledges the great development challenges of three particular types of regions with specific geographical features: mountainous regions, island regions and sparsely populated regions; without diminishing the significant role that territorial cohesion can play in addressing the problems of those regions, expresses the view that territorial cohesion should not be a policy exclusively directed towards regions with geographical handicaps; considers, however, that special consideration should be given on how to offset their handicaps and enable them to convert regional potential into assets and real opportunities and stimulate development, which is vital for the European Union as a whole;
ugotavlja tudi, da se druge regije soočajo s posebnimi izzivi za politiko v smislu gospodarskega in družbenega razvoja, dostopnosti in konkurenčnosti; ti izzivi zajemajo najbolj oddaljene regije, določene v skladu s členom 299(2) Pogodbe ES, obmejne, obrobne in obalne regije ter območja, na katerih število prebivalstva upada; zlasti meni, da mora oddaljenost veljati kot geografska posebnost, zato je treba za te regije sprejeti posebne politične ukrepe; ugotavlja, da se s posebnimi razvojnimi izzivi soočajo tudi majhne otoške države članice, na primer Ciper in Malta;
Notes also that other regions face specific policy challenges in terms of economic and social development, accessibility and competitiveness; those challenges include the outermost regions established in Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, border regions, peripheral regions, coastal regions, as well as regions experiencing depopulation; considers, in particular, that the specific feature of remoteness should be recognised as a particular geographical feature that calls for special policy considerations for those regions; notes the specific challenges that the small island Member States, Cyprus and Malta, also face in their development;
meni, da se teritorialne kohezije ne bi smelo omejiti zgolj na vplive regionalne politike Evropske unije na njenem ozemlju, pač pa bi se morala osredotočiti tudi na teritorialno razsežnost drugih sektorskih politik EU z močnim teritorialnim vplivom; v smislu teritorialne kohezije poudarja, da je treba izboljšati medsebojno dopolnjevanje različnih politik EU, da bi bil njihov teritorialni vpliv na terenu usklajen in čim večji; obenem tudi poudarja, da bodo politike EU vedno ostale avtonomne in da ta proces ne pomeni prevlade ene politike nad drugo;
Believes that territorial cohesion should not be limited to the effects of EU regional policy on the territory of the European Union, but should also focus on the territorial dimension of other sectoral EU policies with a strong territorial impact; stresses, in the context of territorial cohesion, the importance of improving synergies between the different EU policies in order to coordinate and maximise their territorial impact on the ground; notes, however, that all EU policies will always keep their autonomy, and that this process does not imply the subordination of one policy to another;
pričakuje, da bo rezultat javnega posvetovanja jasna in ustrezno odprta opredelitev teritorialne kohezije, glede katere bo dosežen skupen dogovor, ki ga bodo podprle in razumele vse prisotne zainteresirane strani, pa tudi jasnost in preglednost tega koncepta; je seznanjen s predlogom opredelitve, ki ga je podalo francosko predsedstvo Sveta; vendar meni, da mora za teritorialno kohezijo na vseh področjih veljati načelo subsidiarnosti ter da je za boljšo opredelitev in razumevanje teritorialne kohezije potrebna tudi enotna opredelitev pojmov, kot so "ozemlje", "mestno območje", "podeželje" in "gorsko območje";
Expects that a clear and sufficiently flexible definition of territorial cohesion should result from the public consultation, which will be commonly agreed, shared and understood by all stakeholders on the ground and provide clarity and transparency in regard to the concept; notes, in this respect, the proposal for a definition put forward by the French Council Presidency; considers, however, that territorial cohesion must be subject to the principle of subsidiarity in all areas; also believes that, in order better to define and understand territorial cohesion, common definitions of concepts such as 'territory', 'rural area' and 'mountain area' should also be established;
meni, da bi moral biti v prihodnji opredelitvi teritorialne kohezije poudarek na številnih elementih, med drugim to, da teritorialna kohezija zajema več kot gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo ter da njena horizontalnost in celoviti pristop spodbujata medregionalne in čezmejne aktivnosti; meni, da je cilj teritorialne kohezije zmanjševanje neenakosti med državami članicami in regijami ter zagotavljanje usklajenega in trajnostnega razvoja geografskih območij z različnimi značilnostmi in posebnostmi, in sicer z ocenjevanjem, kako je mogoče kohezijo EU ter druge sektorske politike oblikovati, da bodo čim bolj prilagojene tem posebnostim; poudarja, da je treba v prihodnje pri opredelitvi tega pojma tudi jasno določiti, da se mora teritorialna kohezija močno osredotočati na dobro upravljanje, tudi v smislu partnerstva med javnimi in zasebnimi akterji ter civilno družbo, ter državljanom Unije zagotavljati pravične možnosti glede življenjskih pogojev in kakovosti življenja;
Considers that a number of elements should be central to the future definition of territorial cohesion, including the notion that territorial cohesion extends beyond economic and social cohesion and that its horizontal nature and integrated approach encourages action across territories and boundaries; believes that territorial cohesion aims at reducing disparities between Member States and regions and should ensure the harmonious and sustainable development of geographical areas with different characteristics and specificities by assessing how EU cohesion and other sectoral policies can be best tailored to their situation; stresses that any future definition should also make clear that territorial cohesion should focus strongly on good governance, also with regard to partnership between public, private and civil society players, providing citizens of the Union with fair opportunities in terms of living conditions and quality of life;
odločno poziva Komisijo, naj po zaključku tega posvetovalnega postopka objavi belo knjigo o teritorialni koheziji, saj bi se s tem dokumentom teritorialno kohezijo jasno opredelilo in utrdilo, kot tudi njeno dodano vrednost za kohezijsko politiko, poleg tega pa bi se predlagale konkretne določbe in politični ukrepi, ki bi prispevali k rešitvi vse večjih težav, s katerimi se soočajo regije EU in ki bi jih morali nato vključiti v zakonodajni sveženj o strukturnih skladih za obdobje po letu 2013 ter s tem povezani finančni okvir; meni, da bi bilo treba v belo knjigo o teritorialni koheziji vključiti tudi osnovno izjavo o njenih proračunskih in finančnih posledicah;
Strongly urges the Commission to proceed with the publication of a White Paper on territorial cohesion, following the end of its consultation process; believes that a White Paper would be instrumental in clearly defining and consolidating the notion of territorial cohesion and its added value for cohesion policy, and would propose concrete provisions and policy actions in order to help solve the growing problems that EU regions are facing, which should subsequently be introduced in the post-2013 legislative package on Structural Funds and the related financial framework; believes that an initial statement on possible budgetary and financial implications of territorial cohesion should also be included in such a White Paper;
pozdravlja objavo poročila Komisije "Regije 2020"; poziva Komisijo, naj v belo knjigo o teritorialni koheziji vključi ugotovitve in rezultate analiz iz tega poročila, zlasti v zvezi z opisom ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije;
Welcomes the publication of the Commission Report on Regions 2020; calls on the Commission to incorporate the findings and analyses of that working document into its White Paper on Territorial Cohesion, in particular in connection with the description of economic, social and territorial cohesion;
meni, da bo treba koncepte koncentracije, povezovanja in sodelovanja, na katerih temelji analiza teritorialne kohezije iz zelene knjige, nadalje razviti in spremeniti v oprijemljive možnosti za politiko; odločno poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kako bodo ti koncepti vključeni v zakonodajni okvir za obdobje po letu 2013;
Considers that the three concepts of concentration, connection and cooperation, on which the Green Paper's analysis on territorial cohesion was based, need to be further developed and translated into concrete policy options; urges the Commission to explain how those concepts will be integrated into the post-2013 legislative framework;
poziva k precejšnji okrepitvi cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja v naslednjem programskem obdobju; je prepričan, da ta cilj vsebuje dodano vrednost EU, tudi zaradi neposrednega sodelovanja regionalnih in lokalnih organov pri načrtovanju in izvajanju ustreznih programov čezmejnega, nadnacionalnega in medregijskega sodelovanja; vendar tudi meni, da to ne sme ogrožati drugih dveh ciljev; v zvezi s tem tudi poudarja pomembnost celostnega razvoja morskih bazenov in čezmejne razsežnosti ter ustreznih operativnih programov evropske sosedske politike, ki je pomembna zlasti za širitve EU v prihodnosti;
Calls for a significant reinforcement of the European Territorial Cooperation Objective for the next programming period; is convinced of the added value to the European Union of that objective, not least because of the direct involvement of regional and local authorities in the planning and implementation of the relevant programmes of cross-border, trans-national and interregional cooperation; considers, however, that this should not be done to the detriment of the other two objectives; to that end, also stresses the importance of the integrated development of sea basins as well as the cross-border dimension and the relevant operational programmes of the European Neighbourhood Policy, which is particularly significant in view of future EU enlargements;
meni, da bi bilo treba teritorialno kohezijo razvijati kot horizontalno načelo, ki mora biti osnova za vse politike in ukrepe EU; meni, da bi moral biti zgled za to, kako vključiti teritorialno kohezijo v prihodnji razvoj vseh ustreznih politik EU, razvoj načel trajnostnega razvoja in varstva okolja, saj mora teritorialna kohezija nastopati na vseh področjih politik, povezanih s kohezijo; vendar meni, da ta horizontalna razsežnost teritorialne kohezije slednje ne sme omejiti na splošen, abstrakten paket vrednot; poziva EU, naj sprejme vse potrebne pobude za vložitev zakonodajnih in političnih predlogov o teritorialni koheziji;
Is of the opinion that territorial cohesion should develop as a horizontal principle and should underpin all EU policies and actions; believes that the evolution of the principles of sustainable development and environmental protection should serve as an example for how to integrate territorial cohesion in the future development of all relevant EU policies, as it must appear in all policy areas connected with cohesion; considers, however, that the horizontal dimension of territorial cohesion should not result in its limitation to a generalised, abstract framework of values; calls on the European Union to take all the necessary initiatives to translate territorial cohesion into legislative and policy proposals;
poudarja pomembnost vključevanja vidika spola, enakih možnosti in posebnih potreb invalidnih oseb ter starejših državljanov na vseh stopnjah izvajanja in ocenjevanja kohezijske politike EU;
Recalls the importance of mainstreaming the gender perspective, equal opportunities and the special needs of persons with disabilities and senior citizens at every stage in the implementation and assessment of the EU cohesion policy;
poudarja, da je treba za teritorialno kohezijo opredeliti dodatne kvalitativne kazalnike za boljše oblikovanje in izvajanje ustreznih politik na terenu, pri čemer bodo upoštevane tudi različne ozemeljske posebnosti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj brez odlašanja pripravi potrebne študije in razvije možnost opredelitve novih, zanesljivih kazalnikov in načina, na katerega jih je mogoče vključiti v sistem za oceno regionalnih razlik;
Stresses the need to elaborate, in the context of territorial cohesion, additional qualitative indicators with the purpose of better designing and implementing the corresponding policies on the ground, taking into account the different territorial specificities; calls on the Commission, therefore, to draw up, without delay, the necessary studies and to develop the possibility of defining new, reliable indicators and the way in which they are to be integrated into the system for assessing regional disparities;
ugotavlja, da je BDP edino merilo za določanje upravičenosti regij v okviru cilja 1 (konvergenca), za regije, ki so upravičene do sredstev v okviru cilja regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja, pa se lahko uporabljajo tudi drugi kazalniki; izraža zaskrbljenost nad tem, da nesporno povečanje konvergence med državami pogosto zakriva naraščajoče število razlik med regijami in znotraj njih, ter zaradi tega vztraja, da je treba nujno temeljito preučiti smotrnost uporabe BDP kot glavnega merila za dodelitev sredstev iz strukturnih skladov;
Notes that GDP has been the only criterion for determining the eligibility of regions under Objective 1 (Convergence), while other indicators can already be employed for regions eligible under the Regional Competitiveness and Employment Objective; stresses its concern at the fact that the undeniable increase in convergence between countries often masks the increasing number of differences between and within regions, and on that ground insists on the need for in-depth consideration of the merit of GDP as the main criterion regarding eligibility from the Structural Funds;
meni, da je mogoče razlike med regijami NUTS II bolje opazovati na ravni NUTS III; zato poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, v kolikšni meri je mogoče v prihodnje odpraviti težavo notranjih razlik med območji NUTS II tudi z določitvijo upravičenih območij na ravni NUTS III; poudarja, da morajo pri oblikovanju in izvajanju programov strukturnih skladov v zvezi s teritorialno kohezijo same države članice določiti, katere teritorialne enote spadajo v ustrezno raven ukrepov; zato priporoča, da se na začetku posameznega programskega obdobja izvede prostorska analiza celotnega ozemlja EU;
Considers that the problem of intra-regional disparities within NUTS II regions can be better observed at the NUTS III level; calls on the Commission, therefore, to examine the extent to which the problem of the internal disparities within NUTS II areas can be countered in the future by also defining assisted areas at the NUTS III level; stresses, in the context of territorial cohesion, the importance for the Member States to determine which territorial unit corresponds to the appropriate level of intervention during the designing and implementation of Structural Funds programmes; recommends, for this purpose, a spatial analysis of the entire EU territory at the beginning of each programming period;
meni, da je za boljše usklajevanje teritorialnega vpliva sektorskih politik EU potrebno boljše razumevanje in meritev tega vpliva; zato poziva Komisijo, naj oceni teritorialni vpliv teh politik, obstoječe mehanizme za oceno teritorialnega vpliva, kot je strateška okoljska presoja, pa razširi na teritorialne vidike; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi konkretne ukrepe za zagotovitev medsebojnega dopolnjevanja med temi teritorialnimi in sektorskimi politikami ter izvede oceno o prispevku lizbonske-göteborške strategije k teritorialni koheziji;
Believes that in order better to coordinate the territorial impact of sectoral EU policies, there needs to be a better understanding and measurement of those impacts; urges the Commission, therefore, to proceed with a territorial impact assessment of those policies, and to extend the existing impact assessment mechanisms, such as the Strategic Environmental Assessment, to territorial aspects; calls on the Commission also to present concrete ways of creating synergies between those territorial and sectoral policies and to proceed with an assessment of the contribution of Lisbon-Gothenburg strategies on territorial cohesion;