natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja na kronično premajhno financiranje postavke 4, zaradi česar EU primanjkuje sredstev za zunanjo politiko ter onemogoča njeno ambicijo, da bi imela pomembno vlogo na mednarodnem prizorišču na področju zunanjih zadev, varnostne politike in razvojnega sodelovanja; poziva Komisijo, naj izkoristi vse možnosti, ki jih ji omogoča veljavna Pogodba, da pospeši razvoj, določen v lizbonski pogodbi, na primer glede zunanjih zadev in večje usklajenosti med različnimi vidiki zunanje politike (trgovina, razvojna pomoč idr.); poudarja, da je zunanja razsežnost politik na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev postala pomemben sestavni del skupne zunanje in varnostne politike ter sosedske politike, ter poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj s Parlamentom opredeli skladen politični okvir za ukrepe EU v prihodnje;
Draws attention to the chronic ‘under-funding’ of Heading 4, which serves to deprive the EU of resources for its foreign policy and its ambition to play a major role on the international scene in the area of foreign affairs, security policy and development cooperation; calls on the Commission to use all the scope available under the current Treaty in order to push ahead with the developments laid out in the Lisbon Treaty, for example as regards foreign affairs and the strengthening of coherence between the various aspects of foreign policy (trade, development aid, etc); points out that the external dimension of JHA policies has become an important component of the CFSP and the neighbourhood policy and calls on the Commission to define jointly with Parliament a coherent political framework for future EU action;
poziva Komisijo, naj prispeva k izvajanju sklepov o Sredozemlju, sprejetih na pariškem vrhu julija 2007, naj prevzame dejavno vlogo pri oblikovanju nove institucionalne strukture ter naj zagotovi, da evro-sredozemska parlamentarna skupščina kot legitimna parlamentarna razsežnost postane sestavni del te strukture; meni, da bi morala Komisija ohraniti tudi element Skupnosti barcelonskega procesa, kar se odraža tudi v prispevku EU za financiranje tega procesa;
Calls on the Commission to contribute to the implementation of the decisions taken on the Mediterranean at the Paris Summit in July 2008, to play an active role in setting up the new institutional structure and to ensure that the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly, as a legitimate parliamentary dimension, becomes an integral part of that structure; considers that the Commission should also maintain the Community element of the Barcelona Process, which is also reflected in the EU contribution to financing this process;
obžaluje, da finančne zaveze za Kosovo v prihodnje niso natančneje določene; meni, da bi bilo treba pomoč uporabiti tudi za zagotavljanje enake obravnave manjšin na Kosovu, predvsem Srbov;
Deplores the fact that future financial commitments for Kosovo are not specified in greater detail; takes the view that the aid should also be used to ensure equal treatment of minorities in Kosovo, including in particular the Serbs;
poudarja, da je treba okrepiti sodelovanje s sosednjimi državami v črnomorski regiji, ter poziva Komisijo, naj zato pripravi poseben predlog Parlamentu in Svetu o vzpostavitvi večstranske institucionalne ureditve za črnomorsko regijo, ki naj vključuje Turčijo in Ukrajino; v interesu stabilnosti celotne regije in zanesljive oskrbe z energijo bi bilo treba vključiti tudi sosednje države, na primer Kazahstan;
Underlines the need to enhance cooperation with neighbouring countries in the Black Sea region, and calls on the Commission, therefore, to make a specific proposal to it and the Council on setting up a multilateral institutional arrangement for the Black Sea region, including Turkey and Ukraine; neighbouring countries such as Kazakhstan should be involved, in the interests of stability in the region and secure energy supplies;
Izvajanje, upravljanje in boljša pravna ureditev
Implementation, Management and Better Regulation
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi prizadevanja za hitrejši napredek pri splošnem izvajanju načela o pripravi proračuna z upoštevanjem enakopravnosti spolov; pozdravlja pripravljenost Komisije, da sistematično uveljavlja načelo enakosti med spoloma v proračunskem postopku, ter pričakuje izsledke študije o izvedljivosti upoštevanja enakosti spolov v proračunskem postopku EU;
Urges the Commission to step up its efforts to make more rapid progress towards the general implementation of the principle of gender budgeting; welcomes the Commission's willingness to systematically apply gender mainstreaming in the budgetary process, and awaits the outcome of the study on the feasibility of gender budgeting in the EU budgetary process;
poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe, da državam članicam zagotovi preprost, ustrezen in učinkovit okvir za smiselno in uspešno porabo strukturnih sredstev, skupaj s smernicami za izvajanje najboljše prakse in za jasno opredelitev območne kohezije;
Calls on the Commission to take the measures needed to provide the Member States with a simplified, approriate and efficient framework for the sound and productive use of structural funding, including guidelines leading towards the implementation of best practices and towards a clear definition of territorial cohesion;
graja počasno izvajanje programa Daphne III (boj proti nasilju) ter poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši ustrezne postopke;
Criticises the slow implementation of the Daphne III programme (Fight against Violence) and urges the Commission to speed up the relevant procedures;
poziva Komisijo, naj sodeluje z državami članicami za izboljšanje kakovosti nacionalnih izjav o financiranju EU (kot določata medinstitucionalni sporazum in finančna uredba), vključno z možnostjo, da jih pregledajo nacionalna računska sodišča ali Evropsko računsko sodišče; poleg tega kot ključni del razrešnice za finančno leto 2007 pričakuje nadaljnji napredek v sodelovanju z državami članicami pri izvajanju akcijskega načrta za strukturne sklade ter novega sistema poročanja o nepravilnostih in izterjavi; zahteva zgodnje poročilo o teh prizadevanjih, da bi Parlament imel uporabno informacijsko orodje;
Calls on the Commission to work with Member States in improving the quality of national declarations on EU funding (as provided for by the IIA and the Financial Regulation), including the possible auditing of these declarations by national courts of auditors or by the ECA; furthermore, expects, as a key factor in the discharge for the 2007 financial year, further progress in cooperation with Member States on the implementation of the action plan for the Structural Funds and the new reporting scheme on irregularities and recoveries; requests an early report on these efforts, so that it has a usable information tool;
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0006/2008 in B6‑0007/2008
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0006/2008 and B6‑0007/2008
o letni razpravi o napredku v letu 2007 v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 Pogodbe o EU)
on the annual debate on the progress made in 2007 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o letni razpravi o napredku v letu 2007 v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice (člena 2 in 39 Pogodbe o EU)
European Parliament resolution on the annual debate on the progress made in 2007 in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6 in 39 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji ter členov 13, 17–22, 61–69, 255 in 286 Pogodbe o Evropski skupnosti, ki so glavni pravni temelj za razvoj Evropske unije in Skupnosti kot območja svobode, varnosti in pravice,
having regard to Articles 2, 6 and 39 of the Treaty on European Union and Articles 13, 17 to 22, 61 to 69, 255 and 286 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which form the main legal basis for the development of the EU and the Community as an area of freedom, security and justice,
ob upoštevanju vprašanj za ustni odgovor B6-0006/2008 in B6-0007/2008 ,
having regard to Oral Questions B6-0006/2008 and B6-0007/2008 ,
ker je zagotavljanje svobode, varnosti in pravice za svoje državljane prvenstveno pristojnost držav članic; in ker mora Evropska unija od začetka veljavnosti maastrichtske pogodbe in še bolj od začetka veljavnosti amsterdamske pogodbe prispevati k uresničitvi istih ciljev, pri čemer mora upoštevati pričakovanja evropskih državljanov glede zaščite temeljnih pravic in uporabe načel pravne države v Uniji ter lojalnega in učinkovitega sodelovanja med njenimi državami članicami,
whereas Member States have prime responsibility for ensuring freedom, security and justice for their citizens; whereas, however, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Maastricht and, even more, that of the Treaty of Amsterdam, the European Union is required to contribute to the achievement of these same objectives, bearing in mind the expectations of European citizens as regards the protection of fundamental rights and the application within the Union of the principles of the rule of law and sincere and effective cooperation between its Member States;
ker je ratifikacija lizbonske pogodbe bistven in nujen pogoj za to, da Evropska unija postane območje svobode, varnosti in pravice, saj vsebuje temeljne izboljšave glede zakonitosti in učinkovitosti ukrepov EU,
whereas the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty is an essential and urgent condition for ensuring that the EU is an area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) as it contains fundamental improvements to the legitimacy and effectiveness of EU action,
ker je bil na pripravljalnem srečanju 26. novembra 2007 z nacionalnimi parlamenti http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/200801/20080117ATT19095/20080117ATT19095EN.pdf in med zadnjo razpravo na plenarnem zasedanju 31. januarja 2008 izpostavljen pomen dobre priprave na prehod na nov pravni okvir, ki bo temeljil na ratifikaciji pogodbe, podpisane v Lizboni 13. decembra 2007 Besedilo na voljo na: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.asp?id=1296&amp;lang=en , ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji in uvaja Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije,
whereas the comments made both at the preparatory meeting of 26 November 2007 with the national parliaments http://www.europarl.europa.eu/document/activities/cont/200801/20080117ATT19095/20080117ATT19095EN.pdf and during the most recent debate in plenary on 31 January 2008 underlined the importance of laying thorough groundwork for the transition to the new legal framework that will result from the ratification of the Treaty signed in Lisbon on 13 December 2007 Text available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/showPage.asp?id=1296&amp;lang=en , which amends the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and establishes a Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
vendar ker se zaveda, da pravo območje svobode, varnosti in pravice še zdaleč ni vzpostavljeno ter da so v zvezi s tem še vedno prisotne velike težave in ovire, kar je potrjeno v tretjem poročilu o izvajanju haaškega programa leta 2007 (KOM(2008) 373, SEC(2008) 2048, SEC(2008) 2049),
aware, however, that the establishment of a genuine AFSJ is far from having been completed and still faces major difficulties and obstacles, as confirmed in the Commission's third report on the implementation in 2007 of the Hague Programme (COM(2008) 373, SEC(2008) 2048, SEC(2008) 2049),
ker obžaluje, da, kot poudarja to poročilo in kljub sprejetju številnih pomembnih ukrepov, program, ki je bil določen na Evropskem svetu v Haagu leta 2004, hudo zamuja, in da zlasti
regretting that, as this report stresses and notwithstanding the adoption of a number of major measures, the programme established by the Hague European Council in 2004 is seriously behind schedule and, in particular, that
– še vedno obstaja resno pomanjkanje medsebojnega zaupanja in predvsem solidarnosti med državami članicami, zlasti kar zadeva politiko o zakonitem in nezakonitem priseljevanju ter policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah,
– there is still a serious lack of mutual trust and, above all, solidarity between Member States, especially as regards policies on legal and illegal immigration and judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters,
– te težave vplivajo tudi na prenos maloštevilnih sprejetih ukrepov, saj je bil napredek očitno nezadosten na naslednjih področjih: vizumska politika, izmenjava informacij med organi kazenskega pregona in sodnimi organi, preprečevanje in boj proti organiziranemu kriminalu, krizno upravljanje znotraj Evropske unije, policijsko in carinsko sodelovanje ter pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah;
– these problems also affect the phase of transposition of the few measures adopted since 'an insufficient level of achievement was evident in the following areas: Visa Policy, Sharing of Information among Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities, Prevention of and the Fight against Organised Crime, Management of Crises within the European Union, Police and Customs Cooperation and Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters',
ker države članice v okviru svojih pripravljalnih dejavnosti v zvezi s prihodnjim programom območja svobode, varnosti in pravice za obdobje 2010–2014 omenjajo enake težave (glej poročila skupin „Prihodnost“ – dokument 11657/08, „Notranje zadeve“ – dokument …./08, „Pravice“ in prispevke drugih držav članic, ki so bili predloženi Svetu in Komisiji), ob priznavanju, da je obstoječi pravni red na področju evropskih notranjih zadev, ki je bil razvit korak za korakom, nujno nestrukturiran in zato težko razložljiv evropskim državljanom; ker ga včasih težko razumejo celo strokovnjaki ker se nekateri instrumenti prekrivajo, pravna podlaga za nekatere ukrepe pa se nahaja v različnih aktih; in končno, ker postaja spremljanje pravilnega izvajanja direktiv Evropske unije v kar 27 državah članicah tudi vedno težje in dolgotrajno,
noting that the Member States themselves mention these problems in the context of their preparatory work for the future programme of the AFSJ for the period 2010-2014 (see the reports of the Future Group - Doc 11657/08, the Home Affairs Group - Doc. .../08 and the Justice Group, as well as the contributions of other Member States submitted to the Council and the Commission), recognising that the existing 'acquis' in the field of European Home Affairs which was developed step by step is necessarily unstructured and therefore difficult to explain to European citizens; noting that it is sometimes hard to understand even for specialists and that some of these instruments overlap and the legal basis for some actions can be found in different acts; noting, finally, that it is becoming increasingly difficult and time-consuming to monitor the proper implementation of European Union directives by as many as 27 Member States,
ker je podobno kot Svet prepričan, da Evropska unija nima druge izbire, kot da vztraja pri izvajanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, „ki zadeva bistvo nacionalnih ustavnih redov“, ter da „imajo države članice poseben interes za ohranjanje dialoga med seboj“, pa tudi z evropskimi institucijami,
convinced, however, like the Council, that the European Union has no other choice but to insist on implementing the AFSJ, 'which touches the core of the national constitutional orders', and that 'Member States have a special interest in maintaining a dialogue with each other' as much as with the European institutions,
ker pa je v tem obdobju tranzicije do zaključka ratifikacije nove pogodbe pred koncem leta 2009 treba sprejeti nekatere splošne ukrepe, ki bi, kljub zgledovanju po lizbonski pogodbi, še vedno lahko bili sprejeti v skladu z veljavnimi pogodbami ter v skladu s členom 18 Dunajske konvencije o pogodbenem pravu, in ki bi lahko zmanjšali negativni vpliv omenjenih težav; ker bi šlo predvsem za ukrepe v zvezi z:
convinced that, in this transitional phase towards the conclusion of the ratification of the new Treaty, it is necessary to adopt before the end of 2009 certain general measures which, while drawing their inspiration from the Lisbon Treaty, could still be adopted under the present Treaties in full compliance with Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and which could reduce the adverse effects of the problems mentioned above; whereas these would include measures to:
– upoštevanjem postopkov, struktur in odločitev institucij ter načel in ciljev iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki je bila razglašena 12. decembra 2007 v Strasbourgu Besedilo: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:SOM:EN:html ,
– take account of the institutions' procedures, structures and decisions, and of the principles and objectives set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights, proclaimed in Strasbourg on 12 December 2007 Text: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:SOM:EN:html ,
spodbujanjem preglednosti pri odločanju na evropski in nacionalni ravni, zlasti v zvezi z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, v skladu z nedavno sodbo Sodišča glede preglednosti zakonodaje (zadeva Turco),
– promote decision-making transparency at European and national level, in particular in connection with the AFSJ, in accordance with the recent judgment of the Court of Justice on legislative transparency (Turco case),
– učinkovitim sodelovanjem nacionalnih parlamentov pri vzpostavitvi in izvajanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice, vključno glede ocenjevanja teh politik v drugih državah članicah in s strani evropskih agencij,
– effectively involve the national parliaments in the establishment and implementation of the AFSJ, including as regards assessment of these policies in the other Member States and by European agencies,
– spoštovanjem dejstva, da ima pri sklepanju mednarodnih pogodb pravo Skupnosti prednost pred pravom EU (člen 47 Pogodbe o EU), zlasti ko gre za sankcije, ki zadevajo prebivalce tretjih držav ali ko obstaja nevarnost diskriminacije evropskih državljanov (odprava vizumov); Evropski parlament bi moral biti sistematično vključen v sklepanje mednarodnih pogodb Evropske unije, ki so povezane s pravosodnim in policijskim sodelovanjem v kazenskih zadevah,
– ensure respect for the primacy of Community law over EU law (Article 47 TEU) in the conclusion of international agreements, especially in the case of sanctions affecting nationals of third countries or where European citizens are liable to be discriminated against (visa waiver); the European Parliament should systematically be associated in the conclusion by the EU of international agreements relating to judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters,
– krepitvijo lojalnega sodelovanja in solidarnosti med državami članicami pri izvajanju politik in ukrepov, ki jih je sprejela Evropska unija, z okrepitvijo in demokratizacijo mehanizmov medsebojnega ocenjevanja, ki so že bili predvideni pri schengenskem sodelovanju in pri boju proti terorizmu;
– strengthen sincere cooperation and solidarity between Member States in implementing policies and measures taken by the EU by strengthening and democratising the mutual assessment mechanisms already provided for in Schengen cooperation and in the fight against terrorism,
– tesnejšim sodelovanjem v prvem stebru, če bi bilo potrebno soglasje nemogoče doseči (glej primer predloga v zvezi z razvezami),
– initiate enhanced cooperation under the first pillar where the required unanimity is impossible to achieve (see the case of the proposal on divorce),
– preseganjem začetne faze in negotovosti pri pobudah agencij, ki jih je ustanovila Evropska unija, ter sodelovanja med nacionalnimi upravami;
– go beyond the as yet embryonic and uncertain nature of initiatives conducted by the agencies set up by the European Union and cooperation with national administrations,
– izvajanjem prave komunikacijske politike, ki bo evropskim državljanom omogočila, da bodo bolje obveščeni o pobudah, ki nastanejo na evropski in nacionalni ravni, ter da bodo poznali odgovorne evropske in nacionalne organe, na katere se lahko (brez poseganja v pravico dostopa do sodišča) obrnejo glede zadev, ki bi lahko vplivale na njihove temeljne pravice,
– set up a genuine communication policy enabling European citizens to be better informed of initiatives established at European and national level and to become familiar with the relevant European and national authorities which they can contact without prejudice to court action with regard to aspects liable to affect citizens' fundamental rights,
ker je v tem prehodnem obdobju v interesu evropskih državljanov nujno treba upoštevati izboljšave, ki jih prinaša nova pogodba na področju:
whereas, during this transition period, it is all the more important, in the interests of European citizens, to take account of the improvements the new Treaty brings in terms of:
– varstva temeljnih pravic, kot so določene v Listini o temeljnih pravicah, razglašeni v Strasbourgu 12. decembra 2007 Besedilo: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:SOM:EN:html ,
– the protection of fundamental rights, as laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights proclaimed in CityplaceStrasbourg on 12 December 2007 Text: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2007:303:SOM:EN:html ,
– sodnega nadzora Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, vključno nad akti o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju,
– the judicial control exercised by the Court of Justice, including on legislation pertaining to police and judicial control,
– demokratičnega nadzora s širitvijo postopka soodločanja Evropskega parlamenta ter pridružitvijo nacionalnih parlamentov k evropskemu zakonodajnemu postopku in oceni njegovega vpliva zlasti na politiko, ki se nanaša na območje svobode, varnosti in pravice,
– the democratic control resulting from the extension of codecision by the European Parliament and from the involvement of national parliaments in the European lawmaking process and in the assessment of its impact, including with regard to policies linked to the area of freedom, security and justice,
ker obžaluje, da v skladu z veljavnimi pogodbami uporaba ukrepov, povezanih z območjem svobode, varnosti in pravice, s strani evropskih državljanov ostaja bolj omejena kot na drugih področjih dejavnosti EU, da so pooblastila Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti omejena, zlasti na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja na kazenskem področju, ter da določene države članice še naprej omejujejo dialog med evropskimi in nacionalnimi sodniki na tem področju; ker poziva Svet, da do obdobja po ratifikaciji lizbonske pogodbe preloži sprejetje vseh ukrepov, ki bi lahko vplivali na temeljne pravice;
regretting that, under the present Treaties, European citizens' means of redress vis-à-vis AFSJ measures are still more limited than in other areas of EU activity, that the Court of Justice's powers are limited, in particular in the area of judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters and that, in addition, some Member States still restrict dialogue between European and national courts in this area; calling on the Council to postpone the adoption of any measure which might affect fundamental rights until the period after the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty,
Evropski svet, Svet in Komisijo poziva:
Calls on the European Council, the Council and the Commission to:
(a) da nemudoma začnejo s postopkom opredelitve prednostnih nalog naslednjega večletnega programa za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice v obdobju 2010–2014, na temelju ambicioznega in skladnega pristopa, ki presega uradna razmišljanja posameznih vlad in se zgleduje po ciljih in načelih iz Listine o temeljnih pravicah, ki so jo institucije razglasile v Nici leta 2000 in nato ponovno v Lizboni 12. decembra 2007;
(a) initiate as from now the process of determining priorities for the forthcoming AFSJ multiannual programme for the period 2010-2014, on the basis of an ambitious and coherent approach, going far beyond ministerial thinking, and drawing its inspiration from the objectives and principles laid down by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which the institutions proclaimed in Nice in 2000 and again in Lisbon on 12 December 2007;