natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bo oblikovanje mešanice instrumentov prispevalo k optimalni uporabi tržnih instrumentov; s tem v zvezi meni, da lahko tržni instrumenti znatno prispevajo k doseganju ciljev Lizbonske strategije;
Stresses that the development of instrument mixes will help to optimise the use of MBIs; in this context, considers that MBIs can contribute greatly to achieving the goals of the Lisbon agenda;
meni, da morajo biti ukrepi v zvezi z energijsko in podnebno politiko, sprejeti v okviru splošnega koncepta na ravni EU in držav članic, skladni s cilji, ki so bili dogovorjeni v Lizboni in Göteborgu;
Takes the view that energy and climate measures adopted as part of a comprehensive concept at EU and national levels must be brought into line with the objectives agreed in Lisbon and Göteborg;
meni, da so tržni instrumenti ustrezno in učinkovito sredstvo za internalizacijo zunanjih učinkov, ki bi moralo biti pogosteje uporabljeno, ne bi pa moglo nadomestiti upravnih instrumentov, temveč bi jih lahko le dopolnjevalo;
Takes the view that MBIs represent an appropriate and effective means of internalising external effects which should be used much more frequently and which can complement, but not replace, administrative instruments;
poudarja, da mora izvajanje tržnih instrumentov za obravnavo onesnaženja in negativnih učinkov na okolje temeljiti na okoljski učinkovitosti; meni, da bi bilo treba družbene posledice izvajanja tržnih instrumentov ublažiti s posebnimi ukrepi, kot so minimalne cene, znižanje stopenj, subvencije in podobno v korist gospodinjstev z nizkimi prihodki; meni, da je potrebno sprejeti tudi ukrepe za kaznovanje prekomerne porabe;
Stresses that the implementation of MBIs to address pollution and negative environmental impacts needs to be based on environmental effectiveness; takes the view that social consequences resulting from the implementation of MBIs should be compensated for by specific policy measures such as floor prices, rate reductions, subsidies etc. for low-income households; considers it also necessary to adopt measures aimed at penalising excessive consumption;
opozarja, da Direktiva Sveta 2003/96/ES z dne 27. oktobra 2003 o prestrukturiranju okvira Skupnosti za obdavčitev energentov in električne energije UL L 283, 31.10.2003, str.
Recalls that Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p.
(direktiva o obdavčitvi energije) predvideva, da se lahko obdavčenje pod določenimi pogoji v celoti ali delno nadomesti z alternativnimi tržnimi instrumenti, vključno še posebej s sistemom EU za trgovanje z emisijami;
("the Energy Taxation Directive") foresees that, under certain conditions, taxation can be fully or partially replaced by alternative MBIs, including, in particular, the EU ETS;
poudarja pomembno vlogo okoljskega obdavčevanja za dosego okoljskih ciljev;
Emphasises the important role of environmental taxation in achieving environmental objectives;
meni, da se tržni instrumenti Skupnosti ne morejo omejevati na sistem za trgovanje s pravicami do emisij ali z emisijskimi kvotami ter da je treba predvideti druge možnosti, na primer uvedbo davka na premog v zameno za zmanjšanje subvencij za fosilno energijo;
Considers that Community market-based measures cannot be limited to emission permit or emission quota trading schemes and that other possible schemes need to be envisaged, such as the introduction of a carbon tax, as well as a reduction in subsidies for fossil fuels;
poudarja, da se na okoljske davke ne bi smelo gledati kot na možnost za povečanje davčnih prihodkov, ampak kot na sredstvo za preprečevanje škodljivega onesnaževanja ali degradacije okolja, ter posledično način, da se s sprejemljivimi stroški poveča družbena blaginja; poudarja, da bi bilo treba obdavčevanje negativnih dejavnikov, kot je onesnaževanje, izravnati z znižanjem davkov na pozitivne dejavnike, kot je delo;
Stresses that environmental taxes should not be seen primarily as a means to increase fiscal revenue, but rather as a way of avoiding harmful pollution and environmental degradation - and thus enhancing welfare in society - at reasonable cost; stresses that imposing taxes on negative factors, such as pollution, ought to be offset by lessening taxes on positive factors, such as labour;
poudarja, da dajejo pogodbe kljub zahtevam po enotnosti na davčnem področju možnost okrepljenega sodelovanja ter da obstaja odprt način usklajevanja; zato poziva države članice, naj na evropski ravni dosežejo napredek pri okoljskem obdavčevanju ter s tem preprečijo davčni damping;
Points out that, despite the unanimity requirement in the area of taxation, the treaties offer the possibility of enhanced cooperation, and draws attention to the existence of the open coordination method; calls on the Member States, therefore, to make progress on the issue of environmental taxation at European level in order to prevent all forms of fiscal dumping;
ugotavlja, da bo tesnejše sodelovanje EU glede okoljskih davkov in izmenjave najboljših praks olajšalo reformo; še posebej podpira predloge, da države članice znižajo stopnjo davka na dodano vrednost ali ponudijo davčne olajšave za energetsko učinkovite proizvode in energetsko varčne materiale; poudarja pa, da se morajo države članice same odločiti, kaj je primerno za njihove davčne sisteme;
Notes that greater EU coordination on environmental taxes and the exchange of best practices will facilitate reform; supports in particular proposals to allow Member States to reduce VAT rates or offer tax credits for energy efficient products and energy saving materials; stresses however that Member States should decide themselves on what is appropriate for their own tax systems;
ugotavlja koristi reform okoljskega davka; poziva države članice, naj izvedejo omenjene reforme, da med drugim ublažijo energetsko revščino in spodbujajo nizko ogljične tehnologije, prihranke energije, energetsko učinkovitost in obnovljive tehnologije;
Notes the benefits of environmental tax reforms; calls on Member States to implement such reforms to alleviate, inter alia, energy poverty and support low carbon technologies, energy savings, energy efficiency and renewables technologies;
podpira znižanje davka na delo na nacionalni ravni, vendar poudarja, da ni vezano le na reformo okoljskega davka;
Supports the reduction in taxes on labour at national level, but stresses that it is not linked solely to the reform of environmental taxation;
meni, da so različne ravni cen ena od možnosti kako vplivati na načine proizvodnje in porabe ter spodbujati uporabnike k izbiri ustreznih, okolju prijaznejših vrst prevoza (npr. z zmanjšanjem cen javnega prevoza); meni, da mora biti vsako zvišanje zaradi uporabe tržnih instrumentov predvidljivo in da je treba upoštevati posebne okoliščine v posamezni državi članici; vendar poudarja, da je lahko zaradi slabe prožnosti nekaterih sektorjev in kategorij potrošnikov učinek takega ukrepanja omejen;
Considers that price modulation is one way of influencing production and consumption patterns, and of stimulating users to select appropriate environmentally friendlier modes of transport (for instance by reducing prices in public transport); considers that any increase due to the use of MBIs must be predictable and take into account, if necessary, the particular circumstances of each Member State; stresses, nevertheless, that price measures can have a limited impact because of the weak elasticity in certain sectors and in certain categories of consumer;
poudarja potrebo po natančnih podatkih o okoljskih in socialnih stroških, vezanih na celoten življenjski cikel proizvodov in storitev; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga metode za ocenitev teh stroškov;
Stresses the need to obtain precise data on the environmental and social costs for the entire life cycle of products and services; calls on the Commission to put forward a methodology to assess such costs;
pozdravlja nedavno konferenco "Prek BDP", ki so jo organizirali Komisija, Evropski parlament, OECD, Svetovni sklad za naravo in Rimski klub, ter njene pomembne zaključke; poudarja, kako pomembno je dopolniti BDP z drugimi kazalci za merjenje blaginje in družbenega napredka, zlasti kar zadeva vpliv gospodarske rasti na ozračje in ekosisteme;
Welcomes the recent conference "Beyond GDP" organised by the Commission, the European Parliament, the OECD, the WWF and the Club of Rome, and the major conclusions drawn; stresses the importance of complementing GDP by other indicators so as to assess welfare and progress in society in a more balanced way, in particular with regard to the effects of economic growth on the atmosphere and ecosystems;
meni, da lahko tržni instrumenti prispevajo k spodbujanju raziskav in inovacij na področju okolja, ker so zaradi davkov na proizvode in storitve, ki niso prijazni do okolja ali ne upoštevajo okoljskih standardov, proizvajalci prisiljeni vlagati v raziskave o energetsko učinkovitejših proizvodih in storitvah;
Considers that MBIs can help promote research and eco-innovation since, through the taxation of non-environment-friendly products and services or the use of environmental standards, producers are induced to invest in research into more energy-efficient products and services;
priznava, da ima trenutna različica sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami glede na številne vire toplogrednih plinov in udeležene sektorje preozko področje uporabe in da bodo morali Komisija in države članice uvesti potrebne izboljšave za dosego njegove optimalnosti v tretji fazi projekta, ki se začne leta 2013;
Recognises that in its current version the EU ETS has too narrow a field of application, given the numerous greenhouse gas (GHG) sources and sectors involved, and that the improvements needed in order to optimise the EU ETS will have to be made by the Commission and the Member States in the third stage of the project, starting in 2013;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami z določitvijo zgornje meje, ki se bo postopno zniževala, in jo razširi na vse velike onesnaževalce kot glavno sredstvo za doseganje ciljev zmanjšanja emisij toplogrednih plinov do leta 2020;
Urges the Commission to strengthen the EU ETS by establishing a progressively tightening cap and extend it to all first-tier emitters as the main means of achieving the 2020 GHG reduction targets;
zato poudarja nujnost revizije sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami, da bi se učinkovito spoprijeli s pomanjkljivostmi iz poskusnega obdobja, vključno z nepričakovanimi dobički podjetij zaradi sredstev, pridobljenih iz dodeljevanja brezplačnih kvot CO2 (npr. veliki proizvajalci električne energije); poudarja, da močna podpora načelu "plača povzročitelj obremenitve" v strategiji trajnostnega razvoja EU med drugim pomeni, da mora sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami temeljiti predvsem na licitiranju dovoljenj za emisije in na splošni zgornji meji, usklajeni s ciljem 30-odstotnega zmanjšanja v EU do leta 2020, vključno s količinskimi omejitvami in zahtevami glede kakovosti pri uporabi sredstev za financiranje projektov mehanizma za čist razvoj/skupno izvajanje;
Stresses, therefore, the urgent need for a revision of the EU ETS in order to address effectively the shortcomings experienced during the trial period, including the windfall profits of companies due to the assets acquired from the allocation of CO2 quotas free of charge (for instance the large electricity producers); emphasises that the strong endorsement of the polluter pays principle in the EU Sustainable Development Strategy implies that the EU ETS should be primarily based on auctioning of the emission permits and on a total emissions cap that is consistent with the EU 2020 reduction target of 30%, including quantitative limits and qualitative requirements for the use of Clean Development Mechanism / Joint Implementation (CDM/JI) project credits;
s tem v zvezi poudarja pomen spodbujanja razvoja svetovnega trga ogljika, da bi dosegli potrebno občutno zmanjšanje emisij na stroškovno učinkovit način;
Emphasises, in this respect, the importance of encouraging the development of the global carbon market in order to achieve the extensive emission cuts needed in a cost-effective manner;
meni, da je za popolno internalizacijo okoljskih in socialnih stroškov pri vseh vrstah prevoza bistvenega pomena povečana uporaba tržnih instrumentov v prevoznem sektorju; meni, da ima nizka stopnja internalizacije cestnega prometa škodljive učinke na konkurenčnost drugih vrst prevoza, kot so železnice, ter na spodbujanje učinkovitejših in čistejših tehnologij;
Believes that an increased use of MBIs in the transport sector is particularly important in order to fully internalise the environmental and social cost of all transport modes; considers in particular the low degree of internalisation from road traffic as having adverse effects on the competitiveness of other modes of transport, such as rail, and in terms of promoting more efficient and clean technologies;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije, da se letalski sektor vključi v sistem Skupnosti za trgovanje s kvotami emisij CO2, vendar meni, da je obenem treba sprejeti dodatne ukrepe, kot je davek na kerozin in na emisije dušikovega oksida (NOx), za spopadanje s posledicami, ki jih imajo podnebne spremembe za sektor;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal to include aviation activities in the EU ETS, but considers that parallel and complementary measures, such as a kerosene tax and NOx emission charges, are necessary in order to address the climate change impacts of the sector;
zahteva, da Komisija pred letom 2009 predstavi zakonodajni predlog za zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov v pomorskem prometu, saj tega ne ureja še nobena mednarodna zakonodaja ali zakonodaja Skupnosti;
Calls urgently on the Commission to present by 2009 a legislative proposal for GHG reduction in the area of maritime transport, which is not currently subject to any Community or international legislation in this area;
meni, da bi morala obdavčitev energije ostati sekundarno in dopolnilno orodje za zmanjšanje le tistih emisij toplogrednih plinov, na katere sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami ne more posredno ali neposredno vplivati;
Is of the opinion that energy taxation should remain a secondary and complementary GHG reduction tool only for emissions that cannot be influenced by the EU ETS directly or indirectly;
opozarja, da prometni in stavbni sektor predstavljata velik delež pri povpraševanju po energiji in emisijah CO2, ki jih ne pokriva sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami;
Points out that the transport and building sectors account for a large share of energy demand and CO2 emissions not covered by the EU ETS;
meni, da bi morali reviziji direktive o obdavčitvi energije in direktive o težkih tovornih vozilih Direktiva Sveta 93/89/EGS z dne 25. oktobra 1993 o uporabi davkov s strani držav članic na nekatera vozila, ki se uporabljajo za prevoz blaga po cesti, ter cestnin in dajatev za uporabo nekatere infrastrukture (UL L 279, 12.11.1993, str.
Considers that the revision of the Energy Taxation Directive should be carried out rapidly and in conjunction with that on heavy goods vehicles Council Directive 93/89/EEC of 25 October 1993 on the application by Member States of taxes on certain vehicles used for the carriage of goods by road and tolls and charges for the use of certain infrastructures (OJ L 279, 12.11.1993, p.
(direktiva o evrovinjeti) potekati hitro in istočasno, da bi preprečili prekrivanje ukrepov, ki imajo isti cilj, ter da bi spremenili okoljsko zakonodajo tako, da bi različne ekonomske sektorje hitreje preusmerila na okolju naklonjeno vedenje, med drugim z internalizacijo zunanjih stroškov;
(Eurovignette Directive) in order to avoid an overlap in measures designed to achieve the same objective and to change environmental taxation to bring about a rapid reorientation towards environment conscious behaviour in the various sectors of the economy, inter alia through internalisation of external costs;
meni, da bi moralo izvajanje direktive o evrovinjeti biti obvezno v vseh državah članicah ter da bi jo bilo treba prilagoditi, da bi se omogočila internalizacija zunanjih stroškov z dajatvami na uporabo infrastrukture, še posebej na cestne prevoze; meni, da zato, da se prepreči preusmeritev prometa na ceste, ki so izključene iz direktive o evrovinjeti, bi ta morala pokrivati celotno cestno omrežje;
Believes that application of the Eurovignette Directive should be made compulsory in all Member States and adapted in order to allow internalisation of external costs by charging for the use of infrastructure, particularly in road transport; considers that the scope of the Eurovignette Directive should be extended to the entire road network to stop traffic transferring to roads which are currently excluded;
poudarja potrebo, da je pri tržnih instrumentih treba uporabljati načela boljše ureditve ter preprečiti prekrivajoče se in kompleksne instrumente; podpira predlog spremembe direktive o obdavčitvi energije na način, ki bo zagotovil, da udeleženi v sistemu EU za trgovanje z emisijami svojih emisij ne bodo plačali dvakrat, pri trgovanju in pri obdavčenju;
Stresses the need to apply better regulation principles to the use of MBIs and to avoid overlapping and complex instruments; supports the amendment of the Energy Taxation Directive in such a way as to ensure that participants in the EU ETS do not pay twice for their emissions, through both trading and taxation;
meni, da bi pri reviziji zakonodaje o obdavčevanju energetskih proizvodov treba zvišati najnižjo stopnjo davkov na področju prevozov za industrijske ali trgovinske namene; podpira delitev davka na energetski in okoljski del glede na stopnjo emisij CO2;
Considers that as part of the revision of the legislation on the taxation of energy products the minimum rate of taxes on transport for industrial or commercial purposes should be raised; supports the differentiation of taxation into an energy component and an environmental component based on the level of CO2 emissions;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj ocenijo odstopanja in oprostitve, ki so sedaj prisotne v direktivi o obdavčitvi energije, ter naj razmislijo o tem, katera vrsta energije iz fosilnih goriv bi bila v prihodnosti oproščena davkov, pri čemer je treba upoštevati področje izvajanja in duha direktive ter se izogibati podvajanju bremen za izvajalce zaradi uporabe drugih davčnih ali trgovinskih sistemov;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to evaluate the derogations and exemptions contained in the Energy Taxation Directive and to consider which fossil fuel energy source should be tax exempt in future while respecting the scope and the spirit of the directive and avoiding duplicative burdens for operators following from the application of other tax or trading schemes;
poziva, naj se tržni instrumenti za doseganje ciljev okoljske politike na splošno in posebej za internalizacijo zunanjih stroškov v državah članicah in na ravni EU uporabljajo pogosteje; s tem v zvezi bi bilo treba paziti, da suverenost držav članic pri davčnih zadevah ne bi povzročila izkrivljanja konkurence; predlaga na primer uporabo bolj tržno usmerjenih instrumentov za spodbujanje energetske učinkovitosti in toplotne izolacije stavb;
Calls for greater use to be made of MBIs with a view to achieving, in the individual Member States and the EU, environmental policy objectives in general and the internalisation of external costs in particular; in that connection, however, care should be taken to ensure that the Member States" sovereignty in fiscal matters does not give rise to distortions of competition; proposes, for example, the use of more closely market-based instruments to promote energy efficiency and thermal insulation of buildings;
poziva države članice, naj okrepijo svojo spodbujevalno politiko v prid gradbenega sektorja, da bi se zmanjšalo povpraševanje po energiji in emisije CO2; poudarja, da je pomembno podpirati razvoj pasivnih bivanjskih prostorov s pozitivno energijo;
Calls on the Member States to strengthen their incentive policies for the building sector to facilitate a reduction in demand for energy and CO2 emissions; stresses the importance of supporting the development of passive, positive energy housing;
predlaga, da se za financiranje posegov za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti v stanovanjskem sektorju ter uporabe ogljika v javnem prevozu oblikuje sistem nadomestil, podoben mehanizmom iz kjotskega protokola ter primeren za dajanje finančnih spodbud;
Suggests that the funding of energy efficiency improvements in the housing sector and urban transport carbon use should be eligible for compensation under plans modelled on the Kyoto Protocol mechanisms which can provide financial incentives;
meni, da se reforma okolju škodljivih subvencij ne sme omejiti na skupno kmetijsko politiko; meni, da prevozni sektor, zlasti cestni prevoz, potrebuje hitro in odločno posredovanje; poziva Komisijo, da takoj predlaga načrt za postopno, a hitro ukinitev okolju škodljivih subvencij v skladu s sklepom Evropskega sveta o reviziji strategije trajnostnega razvoja;
Considers that reform of EHS must not be limited to the CAP; takes the view that in this area the transport sector, particularly road transport, requires specific, determined action; calls on the Commission rapidly to propose a roadmap for the gradual, but rapid, abolition of EHS in accordance with the European Council's decision on the review of the sustainable development strategy;
se strinja s Komisijo, da je za odpravo okolju škodljivih subvencij nujen dopolnilni ukrep za doseganje trajnostnega razvoja in zlasti ciljev, ki so jih določili voditelji držav in vlad EU v zvezi z integrirano agendo za energijo in podnebne spremembe;
Agrees with the Commission that the removal of EHS constitutes an essential complementary measure for achieving sustainable development and, especially, the objectives endorsed by the EU Heads of State and Government as regards the integrated climate change and energy agenda;
pričakuje od Komisije, da bo pregled usmeritve Skupnosti v državno pomoč za varstvo okolja dejansko upoštevala dejstvo, da je treba spremeniti načine proizvajanja, prevažanja in porabe, ter da je treba zmanjšati količino odpadkov;
Looks to the Commission, when it revises the Community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection, to take proper account of the need to influence production, traffic, transport and consumption patterns and to reduce waste;
opozarja na določbe Skupnosti o odpadkih, vendar obžaluje, ker ne obravnavajo problema količine odpadkov v Evropski uniji; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj razmislijo o zakonodajnem okviru za obdavčevanje odpadkov, da bi se preprečila proizvodnja odpadkov in v srednjeročnem obdobju zmanjšala količina odpadkov, proizvedenih v EU;
Recalls the Community's waste legislation, but considers it regrettable that it fails to address the question of the volume of waste in the European Union; calls on the Commission and the Member States to think about a legislative framework for waste taxation designed to forestall the production of waste and reduce the level of waste generated in the EU in the medium term;
pozdravlja osredotočenost na tržne instrumente pri izvajanju okvirne direktive o vodah Direktiva 2000/60/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2000 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju vodne politike (UL L 327, 22.12.2000, str.
Welcomes the focus on MBIs for implementation of the Water Framework Directive (WFD) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p.