natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
11. poudarja, da bi morala močna, preoblikovana in prožna kohezijska politika, prilagojena trenutnim trendom, predstavljati ključni element strategije EU 2020; meni, da ima ta politika EU s svojim horizontalnim pristopom pomembno vlogo v odgovoru na osrednje izzive, s katerimi se spopada Unija, namreč: zmanjšanje strukturnih razlik med državami in regijami, izboljšanje konkurenčnosti regij EU v globaliziranem svetu, odpravljanje učinkov svetovne gospodarske krize z zagotavljanjem zaupanja in dinamike v evropskem gospodarstvu ter omejevanje vpliva demografskih in podnebnih sprememb;
Underlines that a strong, reformed and flexible cohesion policy, adapted to current needs, should represent a key element of the EU 2020 Strategy; considers that this EU policy, with its horizontal approach, plays a significant role in responding to the central challenges the Union is facing, namely: reducing structural differences between countries and regions, improving competitiveness of EU regions in a globalised world, counterbalancing the effects of the global economic crisis by bringing confidence and dynamism into the European economy, and limiting the effects of demographic change and climate change;
Trajnostni javni proračuni
Sustainable public budgets
16. meni, da nedavni dogodki kažejo, da institucionalni okvir, ki ureja EMU, ni bil uspešen pri ohranjanju javnih primanjkljajev pod nadzorom; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga pobude za reševanje teh pomanjkljivosti v EMU; opozarja na nevarnost Evrope dveh hitrosti;
Considers that recent developments demonstrate that the institutional framework governing the EMU has not been successful in keeping public deficits under control; asks the Commission to propose initiatives to tackle this weakness in the EMU; warns of the danger of a two-speed Europe;
Spodbujanje malih in srednjih podjetij ter delovnih mest
Promoting SMEs and Jobs
19. ponovno poziva k bolj vključujočemu in konkurenčnejšemu trgu dela; meni, da je prestrukturiranje sistemov socialne varnosti potrebno, da bi zagotovili, da sprememba poklica ne pomeni zmanjšanja socialnega varstva, da začasno preusposabljanje za drugo delo ne povzroči upada dohodka in da se pristop prožne varnosti ne osredotoča zgolj na prožnost trga dela;
Reiterates its demands for a more inclusive and competitive labour market; considers that restructuring of social security systems is needed so as to ensure that a change of occupation does not entail a reduction in social protection, that temporary retraining for a different job does not result in a drop in income and that the flexicurity approach is not unilaterally focused on labour market flexibility;
Za trajnostno socialno tržno gospodarstvo
Towards a sustainable social market economy
25. meni, da je prometni sektor pomemben dejavnik pri uresničevanju „zelene rasti“, predvidene v strategiji 2020, in da ta sektor izjemno prispeva h gospodarski rasti, potrebni za izvajanje te strategije; meni, da je za to potrebna mešanica različnih ukrepov, kot so raznovrstnost nabora energetskih virov, ukrepi oblikovanja cen in internalizacija zunanjih stroškov, ter da morajo te ukrepe spremljati jasnejši in realnejši cilji, ki jih je treba redno pregledovati;
Considers that the transport sector is an important actor in achieving the ‘green growth’ foreseen in the 2020 Strategy and that the sector contributes to a remarkable extent to the economic growth required for the implementation of EU 2020; considers that a mixture of different measures such as energy mix, price formation measures and internalisation of external costs are important in this context, and that these measures should be accompanied by clearer and more realistic targets that should regularly be reviewed;
Trajnostna na znanju temelječa rast
Sustainable knowledge - based growth
32. poziva Komisijo, naj tudi v novi strategiji ohrani cilj iz lizbonske strategije „3 % BDP za R&R“ za EU in nacionalne proračune; meni, da bi se morali raziskovalni in razvojni programi ter finančna sredstva osredotočati na strategijo EU 2020 in biti v skladu z njo; poziva države članice, naj bolje izkoristijo sinergijo potenciala sredstev kohezijske politike in sredstev za raziskave in razvoj;
Urges the Commission to preserve the ‘3% of GDP for R&D’ target of the Lisbon Strategy in the new strategy for both the EU and national budgets; considers that research and development programmes and financial means should be focused on, and be in accordance with, the EU 2020 Strategy; calls on the Member States to make better use of the synergy potential of the funds of the Cohesion Policy and the funds for R&D;
37. meni, da razvoj tehnologije in poenostavitev multimodalnih verig za prevoz oseb in blaga imata pomembno vlogo, zlasti v prometu; zato meni, da mora promet temeljiti na učinkoviti somodalnosti, ki jo je mogoče vrednotiti z gospodarskimi in okoljevarstvenimi in varnostnimi merili ter socialnimi pogoji in pogoji zaposlovanja;
Considers that, particularly in transport, the development of technology and the simplification of multimodal transport chains for persons and goods play an important role; believes, therefore, that transport should be based on an effective co-modality that is measured by criteria of economic aspects, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety;
39. je prepričan, da lahko kmetijstvo in gozdarstvo s pravim političnim okvirom in ustreznimi proračunskimi sredstvi igrata pomembno vlogo v celoviti evropski strategiji za zagotavljanje varnega gospodarskega okrevanja, hkrati pa pomembno prispevata k zanesljivi preskrbi s hrano v EU in na splošno v svetu, ohranjanju podeželske krajine, ki zajema 90 % ozemlja EU, zagotavljanju koristi za okolje, in zlasti k iskanju alternativnih virov energije,
Is convinced that, with the right policy framework and adequate budgetary resources, agriculture and forestry can play an important role in an overall European strategy designed to secure economic recovery, while at the same time contributing to EU and global food security, preserving the rural landscape which accounts for 90% of the EU's territory, securing environmental benefits and making an important contribution to the search for alternative energy sources;
4.3.2010 B7-0154/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0154/2010
4.3.2010 B7-0154/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0154/2010
o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA)
on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations
PE433.016v01-00 B7‑0154/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA)
PE433.016v01-00 B7‑0154/2010 European Parliament resolution on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations
– ob upoštevanju člena 218 Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 218 TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Parlamentom in Komisijo za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje ( B7‑0091/2010 ),
– having regard to its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a renewed Framework Agreement between the Parliament and the Commission for the next legislative term ( B7‑0091/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. marca 2009 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev) kot stališča Evropskega parlamenta v prvi obravnavi ( COM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) ,
– having regard to its resolution of 11 March 2009 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast), to be considered as Parliament’s position in first reading ( COM(2008)0229 – C6-0184/2008 – 2008/0090(COD) ),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. decembra 2008 o vplivu ponarejanja na mednarodno trgovino ( 2008/2133(INI) ),
– having regard to its resolution of 18 December 2008 on the impact of counterfeiting on international trade ( 2008/2133(INI) ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 22. februarja 2010 o potekajočih pogajanjih Evropske unije o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju (sporazum ACTA),
– having regard to the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 22 February 2010 on the current negotiations by the European Union of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA),
– ob upoštevanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in zlasti člena 8 te listine,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular Article 8 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij, kot je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009,
– having regard to Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju),
– having regard to Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic com merce, in the Internal Market ( D irective on Electronic Commerce ) ,
A. ker mora biti Evropski parlament v skladu s členom 218.10 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije nemudoma in izčrpno obveščen na vseh stopnjah postopka pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih,
A. whereas, according to Article 218.10 TFEU, the European Parliament must be immediately and fully informed at all stages of the procedure of negotiations on international agreements,
B. ker so leta 2008 Evropska unija in druge države OECD začele pogajanja o novem večstranskem sporazumu za okrepitev uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine ter boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu (trgovinski sporazum o boju proti ponarejanju – sporazum ACTA),
B. whereas in 2008 the European Union and other OECD countries opened negotiations on a new plurilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and combat counterfeiting and piracy (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - ACTA),
C. ker je Parlament v svojem poročilu z dne 11. marca 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj nemudoma omogoči javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu o boju proti ponarejanju,
C. whereas, in its report of 11 March 2009, Parliament called on the Commission to ‘immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available’,
D. ker se je Komisija 27. januarja 2010 zavezala, da bo okrepljeno sodelovala s Parlamentom na podlagi njegove resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu s Komisijo, v kateri zahteva neposredno in celovito zagotavljanje informacij na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih, zlasti o trgovinskih zadevah in drugih pogajanjih v okviru postopka odobritve, tako da se zagotovi polna učinkovitosti člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
D. whereas on 27 January 2010 the Commission made a commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament based on the terms of its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a renewed Framework Agreement with the Commission, demanding ‘immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements, in particular on trade matters and other negotiations involving the consent procedure, to give full effect to Article 218 TFEU’,
E. ker je Komisija kot varuhinja pogodb zavezana, da ščiti pravni red Skupnosti pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo v EU,
E. whereas the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, is obliged to uphold the acquis communau taire when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU,
F. ker se v skladu z dokumenti, ki so prišli v javnost, pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA med drugim dotikajo nastajajoče zakonodaje o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine (COD/2005/0127 – kazenski ukrepi za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine (IPRED-II)) in „paketu telekomunikacij“ ter obstoječe zakonodaje EU o elektronskem poslovanju in varstvu podatkov,
F. whereas, according to leaked documents, the ACTA negotiations touch, inter alia , on pending EU legislation regarding the enforcement of IPRs (COD/2005/0127, Criminal measures aimed at assuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED-II)) and the ‘Telecom Package’, and on existing EU legislation regarding e-commerce and data protection,
G. ker trgovinska pogajanja, ki ne sodijo med običajne postopke odločanja v EU, ne smejo zaobiti prizadevanj EU za uskladitev ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine,
G. whereas the ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures should not be circumvented by trade negotiations which are outside the scope of the normal EU decision-making processes,
H. ker je nujno treba zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine razvijejo na takšen način, da ne ovirajo inovacij ali konkurence, ne spodkopavajo omejitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, ne omejujejo prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjujejo zakonitega trgovanja; ker bi moral imeti Parlament pomembnejšo vlogo v boju proti ponarejanju,
H. whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade; whereas Parliament should be given a more central role in the fight against counterfeiting,
I. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu z zakonskimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima EU v zvezi zakonodajo o spoštovanju zasebnosti, svobodi izražanja in varstvu podatkov, kot določajo zlasti Direktiva 95/46/ES, Direktiva 2002/58/ES ter druga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
I. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy, freedom of expression and data protection law, as set forth, in particular, in Directive 95/46/EC, in Directive 2002/58/EC and in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
J. ker mora v skladu s členom 21 PEU Evropsko unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni voditi načelo univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravi in temeljnih svoboščin,
K. whereas, according to Article 21 TEU, the EU’s actions at international level should be guided by the principle of the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
2. meni, da v zvezi z mednarodnimi pogajanji o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine ali o podobnih vprašanjih, ki imajo zakonodajno naravo in vplivajo na temeljne pravice, ni legitimnih argumentov za nerazkritje; vztraja, da pogajalski položaj EU ali drugih pogajalskih strani ni omejen, če so informacije o pogajanjih na voljo Evropskemu parlamentu in javnosti;
Is of the opinion that legitimate arguments for non-disclosure do not exist with regard to international negotiations on the enforcement of intellectual property rights or similar issues, which are legislative in character and have an impact on fundamental rights; maintains that the negotiating position of the EU or other negotiating parties is not circumscribed if information about the negotiations is available to the European Parliament and the general public;
5. priznava, da bi poleg jasne pravne obveznosti obveščanja Parlamenta, dokumenti o sporazumu ACTA morali biti na voljo tudi splošni javnosti v EU in v drugih državah, ki sodelujejo pri pogajanjih; razume obsežne javne kritike glede tajnosti pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA kot jasen znak, da je izbrani pogajalski postopek politično neustrezen;
Acknowledges that, in addition to the clear legal obligation to inform Parliament, the ACTA documents should also be available to the general public in the EU and in the other countries participating in the negotiations; understands the wide public criticism of the secrecy of the ACTA negotiations as a clear signal of the political unsustainability of the negotiation procedure chosen;
7. opozarja Komisijo, da Parlament ne bo imel druge izbire, kot da v skladu s členom 263 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije pred Sodiščem Evropske unije vloži tožbo zaradi kršitve Pogodb, če ga pred naslednjim krogom pogajanj aprila ne bo nemudoma in izčrpno obveščala o pogajanjih v skladu s členom 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Reminds the Commission that if it does not provide Parliament with immediate and full information about the negotiations in accordance with Art. 218 TFEU before the next round of negotiations in April, Parliament will have no choice but to bring an action in accordance with Art. 263 TFEU for infringement of the Treaties to the Court of Justice of the European Union;
10. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo izvajanje določb sporazuma ACTA, zlasti tistih o postopkih uveljavljanja avtorskih pravic v digitalnem okolju, popolnoma v skladu z duhom in črko pravnega reda Skupnosti in da to ne bo pomenilo, da zasebna podjetja nalagajo „samoregulativne“ ukrepe izven področja demokratičnega postopka določanja; meni, da ponudniki internetnih storitev ne bi smeli nositi take odgovornosti za podatke, ki jih prenašajo ali gostijo s pomočjo svojih storitev, da bi morali podatke pred prenosom nadzirati ali filtrirati;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the enforcement of ACTA provisions – especially those on copyright enforcement procedures in the digital environment – are fully in line with the letter and the spirit of the acquis communautaire and do not imply ‘self-regulatory’ measures being imposed by private companies outside the scope of democratic decision-making processes; considers that Internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would imply prior surveillance or filtering of such data;
4.3.2010 B7-0155/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
4.3.2010 B7-0155/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
o hudih naravnih nesrečah v Avtonomni pokrajini Madeiri in v Franciji
on the major natural disasters in the autonomous region of Madeira and in France
PE433.017v01-00 B7‑0155/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o hudih naravnih nesrečah v Avtonomni pokrajini Madeiri in v Franciji
PE433.017v01-00 B7‑0155/2010 European Parliament resolution on the major natural disasters in the autonomous region of Madeira and in France
– ob upoštevanju člena 191 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (nekdanji člen 174 Pogodbe o ES)
– having regard to Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (formerly Article 174 TEC),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 7. septembra 2006 o gozdnih požarih in poplavah Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2006)0349 .
– having regard to its resolutions of 7 September 2006 on forest fires and floods Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0349 .
, resolucije z dne 5. septembra 2002 o poplavah v Evropi UL C 272 E, 13.11.03, str.
, 5 September 2002 on floods in Europe OJ C 272 E, 13.11.2003, p.
, resolucije z dne 8. septembra 2005 o naravnih nesrečah (požarih in poplavah) v Evropi UL C 193 E, 17.08.06, str.
, 8 September 2005 on natural disasters (fires and floods) in Europe OJ C 193 E, 17.8.2006, p.
in resolucij z dne 18. maja 2006 o naravnih nesrečah (gozdnih požarih, sušah in poplavah) – kmetijskih vidikih Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2006)0222 .
, and its resolutions of 18 May 2006 on natural disasters (forest fires, droughts and floods) – agricultural aspects Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0222 .
, vidikih regionalnega razvoja Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2006)0223 .
, regional development aspects Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0223 .
in okoljskih vidikih Besedila, sprejeta tega dne, P6_TA(2006)0224 .
and environmental aspects Texts adopted of that date, P6_TA(2006)0224 .
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 25. aprila 2007 o skupnem stališču Sveta o sprejetju direktive o ocenjevanju in obvladovanju poplav,
– having regard to its position of 25 April 2007 on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive on the assessment and management of floods,
– ob upoštevanju bele knjige "Prilagajanje podnebnim spremembam: evropskemu okviru za ukrepanje naproti" (KOM(2009)147),
– having regard to the white paper ‘Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action’ (COM(2009)147),
– ob upoštevanju obiska delegacije Odbora za regionalni razvoj na Madeiri od 26. do 28. oktobra 2009,
– having regard to the Committee on Regional Development’s delegation to Madeira which took place 26-28 October 2009,
A. ker so se 20. februarja 2010 v avtonomni pokrajini na otoku Madeira sprožili zemeljski plazovi, nastali zaradi obilnega deževja, ki so povzročili razdejanje v glavnem mestu, in ker so 27. februarja 2010 poplave v Franciji po prehodu atlantske nevihte Xynthia povzročile najmanj 50 človeških žrtev in hudo materialno škodo, mnogo ljudi še pogrešajo, na tisoče pa jih je ostalo brez domov,
A. whereas, on 20 February 2010, mudslides developed due to heavy rainfall on the autonomous Island of Madeira and caused the death of 48 people and destruction around the island’s capital, and on 27 February 2010, flooding in France after Atlantic storm Xynthia caused the loss of at least 50 lives and severe damage, with other people missing and thousands homeless,
B. ker so nesreče poškodovale javno infrastrukturo – tudi ceste, vodno in električno omrežje, kanalizacijo in telekomunikacije – ter zasebne in poslovne zgradbe, industrijska in kmetijska zemljišča, poškodbe vodnega in kanalizacijskega omrežja pa zlasti lahko ogrozijo javno zdravje,
B. whereas the disasters caused damage to public infrastructure – including roads, water supply, electricity, sanitation and telecommunications – as well to private buildings, commercial establishments, industry and agriculture land, and the damage to water supply and sanitation, in particular, could give rise to a public health threat,
C. ker je v zadnjih letih postalo jasno, da bodo težave s poplavami, nevihtami in drugimi skrajnimi vremenskimi pojavi postale čedalje pogostejše; ker so zato naložbe v boj proti podnebnim spremembam naložbe v preprečevanje hudih naravnih nesreč,
C. whereas it has become clear in recent years that problems with floods, storms and other extreme weather phenomena are likely to be increasingly frequent; whereas investment in combating climate change is therefore an investment in preventing catastrophes,
D. ker so bile zaradi velikega turističnega razvoja izgrajene ceste in tlakovane površine na mnogih obalnih območjih, zato odvodni sistemi niso bili kos nenavadno velikim količinam vode in so poplavili,
D. whereas the boom in tourism development led to the construction of roads and the paving-over of surfaces in many coastal areas and, as a consequence, drainage systems have been unable to cope with unusually large volumes of water and have overflowed,
E. ker so bila na nekaterih območjih naravna mokrišča izsušena in uporabljena kot zazidalna zemljišča, potem ko so bi zgrajeni nasipi,
E. whereas, in some areas, natural wetlands have been drained and used as construction sites following the building of dykes,