natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priporoča odobritev ustreznega proračuna za organiziranje srečanj posameznih odborov z sorodnimi odbori nacionalnih parlamentov ter poročevalcev Evropskega parlamenta s sogovorniki iz nacionalnih parlamentov in priporoča preučitev možnosti za vzpostavitev tehničnih pogojev za videokonference med poročevalci odborov nacionalnih parlamentov in Evropskega parlamenta;
Recommends granting an adequate budget to organise meetings of specialised committees with corresponding committees of the national parliaments and of European Parliament rapporteurs with their counterparts in the national parliaments, and recommends examining the possibility of establishing the technical facilities for holding videoconferences between the rapporteurs in the specialised committees of the national parliaments and the European Parliament;
meni, da bodo povečane pristojnosti nacionalnih parlamentov, kot jih glede skladnosti z načelom subsidiarnosti predvideva Lizbonska pogodba, omogočile, da bo evropska zakonodaja podvržena vplivu in nadzoru v zgodnji fazi, in bodo prispevale k boljši pripravi zakonodaje ter večji skladnosti zakonodaje na ravni Evropske unije;
Believes that increased powers of the national parliaments with regard to compliance with the principle of subsidiarity, as provided for in the Treaty of Lisbon, will allow European legislation to be influenced and scrutinised at an early stage and will contribute to better law-making as well as to improved coherence of legislation at EU level;
navaja, da je nacionalnim parlamentom pri zadevah Evropske unije prvič dana jasna vloga, ki se razlikuje od vloge njihovih nacionalnih vlad, prispeva k močnejšemu demokratičnemu nadzoru in Unijo približuje državljankam in državljanom;
States that national parliaments are for the first time being given a defined role in EU matters which is distinct from that of their national governments, contributes to stronger democratic control and brings the Union closer to the citizen;
ponovno opozarja, da morajo nacionalni parlamenti nadzor nad nacionalnimi vladami izvajati v prvi vrsti v skladu z ustreznimi ustavnimi pravili in zakoni;
Recalls that control over the national governments by the national parliaments must be exercised, first and foremost, in accordance with the relevant constitutional rules and laws;
poudarja dejstvo, na so nacionalni parlamenti pomembni akterji pri izvajanju zakonodaje EU in da bi bil na tem področju zelo pomemben mehanizem za izmenjavo najboljših praks;
Highlights the fact that the national parliaments are important players when it comes to the implementation of EU law and that a mechanism for the exchange of best practices in this field would be of great importance;
v tem smislu ugotavlja, da predstavlja oblikovanje elektronske platforme za izmenjavo informacij med parlamenti, spletne strani IPEX IPEX: Medparlamentarna izmenjava informacij o EU (Interparliamentary EU Information Exchange), uradno v uporabi od julija 2006.
Observes in this context that the creation of an electronic platform for the exchange of information between parliaments, the IPEX website IPEX: Interparliamentary EU Information Exchange, officially launched in July 2006.
, velik korak naprej, saj omogoča, da pregledovanje dokumentov Evropske unije poteka na ravni nacionalnih parlamentov in Evropskega parlamenta ter da jih po potrebi nacionalni parlamenti v realnem času prenesejo v nacionalno zakonodajo; zato meni, da je potrebna ustrezna finančna pomoč za ta sistem, ki ga je tehnično razvil in ga upravlja Evropski parlament;
, represents a great step forward inasmuch as it allows the monitoring of EU documents at the level of the national parliaments and at the level of the European Parliament, and where required, their transposition into national law by the national parliaments, to take place in real time; therefore considers appropriate financial support for this system, developed and managed by the European Parliament, to be essential;
predvideva bolj sistematično spremljanje predzakonodajnega dialoga med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Komisijo (tako imenovane "pobude Barroso"), da bi bil tako obveščen o stališču nacionalnih parlamentov v zgodnji fazi zakonodajnega postopka; poziva nacionalne parlamente, naj Evropskemu parlamentu hkrati omogočijo dostop do svojih mnenj, podanih v zvezi s tem;
Envisages more systematic monitoring of the pre-legislative dialogue between the national parliaments and the Commission (the so-called "Barroso initiative") in order to be informed about the national parliaments' position at an early stage of the legislative process; calls on the national parliaments to make the opinions they issue in this context available to the European Parliament at the same time;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad napredkom, ki je bil v zadnjih letih dosežen pri razvoju sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti na področju zunanjih zadev, varnosti in obrambe;
Welcomes the progress made in recent years in developing cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments in the field of foreign affairs, security and defence;
se zaveda, da morajo nacionalni parlamenti odigrati pomembno vlogo s prispevanjem informacij k nacionalni razpravi o skupni zunanji in varnostni politiki (SZVP) in evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki (EVOP);
Recognises that national parliaments have an important role to play in informing national debate about the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP);
ponovno z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da ni zadostne odgovornosti do parlamentov za finančne ukrepe v zvezi s SZVP in EVOP in je zato treba izboljšati sodelovanje med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, da bi dosegli demokratičen nadzor nad vsemi vidiki teh politik Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo o proračunski disciplini in dobrem finančnem poslovodenju (UL C 139, 14.06.06, str.
Notes again with concern that there is too little accountability to parliaments for the financial arrangements with regard to the CFSP and ESDP and that cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments must therefore be improved in order to ensure democratic control over all aspects of these policies Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (OJ C 139, 14 June 2006, p.
1) in člen 28 (3) Pogodbe EU.
1) and Article 28(3) of the Treaty on European Union.
zaradi skladnosti in učinkovitosti ter da se prepreči podvajanje, poziva k razpustitvi skupščine Zahodnoevropske unije (ZEU) po tem, ko bo z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe ZEU polno in dokončno postala del Evropske unije;
Calls, in the interests of coherence and efficiency and to avoid duplication of effort, for the Parliamentary Assembly of the Western European Union (WEU) to be dissolved as soon as the WEU has been absorbed fully and finally into the European Union with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty;
Vloga Konference odborov za zadeve Skupnosti in evropske zadeve parlamentov Evropske unije (COSAC)
The role of COSAC
meni, da bo morala biti politična vloga COSAC-a v prihodnosti opredeljena s tesnim sodelovanjem med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, ter da bi moral COSAC v skladu s Protokolom o vlogi nacionalnim parlamentov v Evropski uniji, ki je priložen Amsterdamski pogodbi, ostati predvsem forum za izmenjavo informacij in razpravo o splošnih političnih vprašanjih in najboljših praksah glede nadzorovanja nacionalnih vlad Glej smernice za odnose med vladami in parlamenti o vprašanjih Skupnosti (informativni minimalni standardi), omenjene zgoraj.
Is of the opinion that the political role of COSAC in the future will have to be defined by close cooperation between the European Parliament and the national parliaments, and that COSAC, in conformity with the Protocol on the role of national parliaments in the European Union annexed to the Treaty of Amsterdam, should remain primarily a forum for the exchange of information and debate on general political issues and best practices with regard to the scrutiny of national governments See the guidelines for relations between governments and Parliaments on Community issues (instructive minimum standards) referred to above.
; meni, da se morajo informacije in razprava osredotočati na zakonodajne dejavnosti, ki se nanašajo na področje svobode, varnosti in pravice, ter na spoštovanje načela subsidiarnosti na ravni Evropske unije;
; considers that information and debate should be focused, secondly, on legislative activities pertaining to the area of freedom, security and justice and on respect of the principle of subsidiarity at European Union level;
je odločen, da bo v celoti opravljal svojo vlogo, izpolnjeval svoje odgovornosti v zvezi z delovanjem COSAC-a ter še naprej zagotavljal tehnično podporo sekretariatu COSAC-a in predstavnikom nacionalnih parlamentov;
Is determined to play its role to the full, to discharge its responsibilities with regard to the functioning of COSAC and to continue to provide technical support to the secretariat of COSAC and the representatives of the national parliaments;
ponovno poudarja, da se morajo dejavnosti Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov v okviru COSAC-a dopolnjevati in se jih ne sme drobiti ali zlorabljati od zunaj;
Recalls that the activities of the European Parliament and of the national parliaments within COSAC must be complementary and must not be fragmented or abused from outside;
meni, da bi morali biti njegovi specializirani odbori bolj vključeni v pripravo srečanj COSAC-a, na njih pa biti bolje zastopani; meni, da bi moral njegovo delegacijo voditi predsednik Odbora za ustavne zadeve, sestavljena pa bi morala biti iz predsednikov in poročevalcev odborov, ki se ukvarjajo z vprašanji na dnevnem redu posameznega srečanja COSAC-a; meni, da je zelo pomembno, da se konferenco predsednikov in poslance po vsakem srečanju obvesti o poteku in ugotovitvah srečanj COSAC-a;
Believes that its specialised committees should be more strongly involved in the preparation of, and representation at, COSAC meetings; considers that its delegation should be led by the chair of its Committee on Constitutional Affairs and should comprise the chairs and rapporteurs of the specialised committees dealing with the items which are on the agenda of the COSAC meeting in question; considers it essential for the Conference of Presidents and Members, after each meeting, to be informed about the progress and results of COSAC meetings;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. maja 2009 s pozivom Komisiji za predložitev predloga Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju državljanske pobude ( 2008/2169(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 7 May 2009 requesting the Commission to submit a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the implementation of the citizens" initiative ( 2008/2169(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe, ki spreminja Pogodbo o Evropski uniji in Pogodbo o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, podpisane 13. decembra 2007,
having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed at Lisbon on 13 December 2007,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za peticije ( A6-0043/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0043/2009 ),
ker Lizbonska pogodba uvaja državljansko pobudo, s katero najmanj milijon državljanov Unije iz večjega števila držav članic lahko s svojo pobudo Komisijo pozove, da v okviru svojih pristojnosti predloži ustrezen predlog v zadevah, za katere državljani menijo, da je za izvajanje Pogodb treba sprejeti pravni akt Unije – člen 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji v različici Lizbonske pogodbe,
whereas the Treaty of Lisbon introduces the citizens" initiative, whereby citizens of the Union numbering not less than one million, who are nationals of a significant number of Member States, may take the initiative of inviting the Commission, within the framework of its powers, to submit any appropriate proposal on matters where citizens consider that a legal act of the Union is required for the purpose of implementing the Treaties – Article 11(4) of the EU Treaty in the Treaty of Lisbon version ("TEU"),
ker bo tako milijon državljanov Unije dobilo enako pravico do poziva Komisiji, naj predloži zakonodajni predlog, kot Svet že od ustanovitve Evropskih skupnosti leta 1957 (prvotno člen 152 Pogodbe EGS, zdaj člen 208 Pogodbe ES in prihodnji člen 241 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) in Parlament od začetka veljave Maastrichtske pogodbe leta 1993 (zdaj člen 192 Pogodbe ES in prihodnji člen 225 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije),
whereas one million citizens of the Union will thus obtain the same right to request the Commission to submit a legislative proposal as the Council has had since the establishment of the European Communities in 1957 (originally under Article 152 of the EEC Treaty, at present Article 208 of the EC Treaty, in future Article 241 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU")), and the European Parliament has had since the entry into force of the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 (at present Article 192 of the EC Treaty, in future Article 225 TFEU),
ker bodo tako državljani neposredno udeleženi pri uresničevanju suverenosti Evropske unije, tako da bodo prvič neposredno sodelovali pri sprožanju evropskih zakonodajnih predlogov,
whereas citizens will thus play a direct role in the exercise of the European Union's sovereign power by being, for the first time, directly involved in the initiation of European legislative proposals,
ker je namen člena 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določitev osebne pravice do sodelovanja pri državljanski pobudi kot posebne izpeljave pravice do sodelovanja v demokratičnem življenju Unije (člen 10(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji),
whereas Article 11(4) TEU aims to establish an individual right to participate in a citizens" initiative, as a special consequence of the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union under Article 10(3) TEU,
ker se pravica do pobude pogosto zamenja s pravico do peticije; ker je treba zagotoviti, da se državljani popolnoma zavedajo tega razlikovanja med njima, zlasti ker se pravica do peticije naslavlja na Parlament, državljanska pobuda pa na Komisijo,
whereas the right of initiative is often confused with the right to petition; whereas there is a need to ensure that citizens are fully aware of the distinction between both rights, particularly since a petition is directed to Parliament while a citizens' initiative is directed to the Commission,
ker morajo institucije Unije in države članice vzpostaviti pogoje za neovirano, pregledno in učinkovito izvajanje pravice do sodelovanja državljanov Unije,
whereas the Union's institutions and the Member States are required to establish the conditions for the smooth, transparent and effective exercise of the right of participation of the citizens of the Union,
ker postopke in pogoje državljanske pobude, vključno z najmanjšim številom držav članic, iz katerih morajo biti državljani, ki podajo pobudo, po rednem zakonodajnem postopku določita Parlament in Svet z uredbo (člen 24(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije),
whereas the procedures and conditions for a citizens" initiative, including the minimum number of Member States from which the citizens taking the initiative must come, shall be determined by Parliament and the Council in accordance with the proper legislative procedure by means of a regulation (Article 24(1) TFEU),
ker je ob sprejetju navedene uredbe in njenem izvajanju treba varovati zlasti temeljne pravice do enakosti, do dobrega upravljanja in do pravnega varstva,
whereas, when that regulation is adopted and implemented, the fundamental rights to equality, good administration and legal protection should be particularly safeguarded,
ker mora "najmanjše število držav članic, iz katerih so ti državljani" (člen 24(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije) pomeniti "večje število držav članic" (člen 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji),
whereas the "minimum number of Member States from which such citizens must come" (Article 24(1) TFEU) must be a "significant number of Member States" (Article 11(4) TEU),
ker določitev najmanjšega števila držav članic ne sme biti poljubna, temveč skladna z namenom uredbe, razlaga pa se v skladu z drugimi določbami Pogodbe, da bi preprečili morebitne protislovne razlage,
whereas the minimum number of Member States must not be determined arbitrarily but must be guided by the regulation's purpose and shall be interpreted with reference to other Treaty provisions, in order to avoid conflicting interpretations,
ker je namen uredbe zagotoviti, da izhodišče evropskega zakonodajnega postopka ni pod vplivom specifičnih interesov posameznih držav članic, ampak mora zadostiti skupnim evropskim interesom,
whereas the purpose of the regulation is to ensure that the starting point of the European legislative process is prompted, not by national vested interests, but by the European common interest,
ker je iz člena 76 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije mogoče sklepati, da zakonodajni predlog, ki ga podpira četrtina držav članic, načeloma v zadostni meri upošteva skupne evropske interese, ker zato takšno najmanjše število ni protislovno,
whereas Article 76 TFEU indicates that a legislative proposal supported by a quarter of the Member States may be presumed to take sufficient account of the European common interest; whereas, therefore, such a minimum number can be considered to be unchallengeable,
ker bo namen uredbe izpolnjen šele, ko bo povezan z najmanjšim številom podpornih izjav iz vsake od teh držav članic,
whereas the purpose of the regulation is fulfilled only if it is associated with a minimum number of statements of support from each of those Member States,
ker je iz člena 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki določa milijon državljanov Unije od približno 500 milijonov vseh državljanov, mogoče razbrati, da naj bi bila 1/500 prebivalstva dovolj reprezentativna,
whereas it can be concluded from Article 11(4) TEU, which specifies the figure of one million citizens of the Union, from a population of approximately 500 million citizens, that 1/500 of the population should be considered to be representative,
Najnižja starost udeležencev
Participants" minimum age
ker člen 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji velja za vse državljane Unije,
whereas Article 11(4) TEU applies to all citizens of the Union,
ker pa mora vsako omejevanje pravice do demokratičnega sodelovanja in vsako neenako obravnavanje na podlagi starosti vseeno biti v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti,
whereas, however, any restriction of the right to democratic participation and any unequal treatment on the grounds of age must satisfy the principle of proportionality,
ker bi bilo poleg tega zaželeno preprečiti protislovja, do katerih bi na primer lahko prišlo, če bi v državi članici najnižja starost za udeležbo na evropskih volitvah bila nižja od najnižje starosti za udeležbo pri državljanski pobudi,
whereas, moreover, it is desirable to avoid conflicting interpretations, of the kind that would arise, for instance, if the minimum age for participation in European elections in a Member State were lower than the minimum age for participation in a citizens" initiative,
ker je Komisija na podlagi uspešne državljanske pobude zavezana, da to zadevo obravnava in odloči, ali in v kolikšnem obsegu bo predložila ustrezen predlog pravnega akta,
whereas a successful citizens" initiative requires the Commission to look into the matters it raises and decide whether and to what extent it should accordingly submit a proposal for a legal act,
ker je zaželeno, da se pobude sklicujejo na eno ali več ustreznih pravnih podlag pri predložitvi predloga pravnega akta s strani Komisije,
whereas it would be advisable for initiatives to refer to one or more appropriate legal bases for the submission of the proposed legal act by the Commission,
ker je državljanska pobuda lahko uspešna samo, če je dopustna v smislu:
whereas a citizens" initiative may proceed only if it is admissible, in so far as:
da vključuje poziv Komisiji, naj predloži predlog pravnega akta Unije,
it contains a request to the Commission to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union,
da ima v zvezi s tem Unija zakonodajno pristojnost, Komisija pa pravico do podajanja predlogov, in
the Union has legislative competence, and the Commission has the right to submit a proposal in the matters concerned, and
da zahtevani pravni akt ni v očitnem nasprotju s splošnimi načeli zakonodaje, kot se uporablja v Uniji,
the requested legal act is not manifestly contrary to the general principles of law as applied in the Union;
ker je državljanska pobuda uspešna, če je dopustna v smislu, navedenem zgoraj, in reprezentativna v smislu, da jo podpira vsaj milijon državljank in državljanov velikega števila držav članic,
whereas a citizens' initiative is successful if it is admissible in the above sense and if it is representative, in the sense that it is supported by at least one million citizens who are nationals of a significant number of Member States,
ker je naloga Komisije, da preveri, ali so izpolnjeni pogoji za uspešno državljansko pobudo,
whereas it is the task of the Commission to verify whether the conditions for a successful citizens" initiative are fulfilled,
ker je za organizacijo državljanske pobude še pred začetkom zbiranja podpornih izjav zelo zaželena pridobitev pravne varnosti glede njene dopustnosti,
whereas for the organisation of a citizens" initiative it is highly desirable to have legal certainty as to the admissibility of the initiative before collecting statements of support,
ker pristnosti podpornih izjav ne more preverjati Komisija, temveč morajo to nalogo prevzeti države članice; ker s tem povezane obveznosti držav članic vendarle obsegajo le pobude v okviru člena 11(4) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in nikakor ne takšnih pobud, ki so v tem smislu nedopustne; ker je zato tudi za države članice še pred začetkom zbiranja podpornih izjav potrebna pridobitev pravne varnosti glede njene dopustnosti,
whereas the task of verifying the authenticity of statements of support cannot be carried out by the Commission and should therefore be fulfilled by the Member States; whereas, however, the obligations of the Member States in that regard extend only to initiatives within the framework of Article11(4) TEU and under no circumstances to initiatives that are inadmissible on the above-mentioned grounds whereas it is therefore necessary for the Member States, even before beginning to collect statements of support, to have legal certainty as regards the admissibility of the citizens" initiative,
ker je preverjanje dopustnosti državljanske pobude s strani Komisije vendarle omejeno izključno na omenjena pravna vprašanja in nikakor ne sme vključevati političnih razlogov; ker se s tem zagotovi, da ni prepuščeno Komisiji, da bi o tem, ali bo sprejela ali zavrnila dopustnost državljanske pobude, odločala na podlagi svojih političnih razlogov,
whereas verification of the admissibility of a citizens" initiative by the Commission is, however, restricted exclusively to the above-mentioned legal grounds and may on no account include considerations of political expediency; whereas this will ensure that the Commission is not free to decide, on the basis of political considerations of its own, whether a citizens" initiative is or is not to be declared admissible,
ker se zdi, da je postopke evropske državljanske pobude smotrno razčleniti na naslednjih pet stopenj:
whereas it would seem appropriate for the procedure for a citizens" initiative to be divided into the following five stages:
prijava pobude,
registering the initiative,
zbiranje podpornih izjav,
collecting statements of support,
vložitev pobude,
presenting the initiative,
izjava Komisije o njenem stališču,
a statement of its position by the Commission,
preverjanje, ali je zahtevani pravni akt v skladu s Pogodbami,
verifying that the requested legal act is consistent with the Treaties.