natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker bodo zaradi uporabe informacijske tehnologije pri reševanju in poravnavanju sporov dolgoročno potrebne temeljite spremembe procesnega prava ter načinov, kako se osnuje in oblikuje zakonodaja, za učinkovit dostop do zakonov in sodstva pa bo potrebno povezovanje registrov (trgovinskih registrov in registrov gospodarskih družb, zemljiških knjig, registrov oporok itd.); ker si je Parlament že prizadeval, da bi dostop do sodstva postal bolj skladen z uporabo informacijske tehnologije, ko je obravnaval zakonodajo o sporih majhne vrednosti, o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo in o posredovanju; ker je treba uporabo informacijske tehnologije spodbujati na vseh področjih, vključno s predložitvijo, razširjanjem in vročitvijo pisanj, predložitvijo dokazov in obravnavo vlog za pravno pomoč, ter bi se moralo to odražati v vseh prihodnjih zakonodajnih predlogih; ker bi bilo že sedaj mogoče razmišljati o ukrepih na področjih elektronskih aktov, preglednosti sredstev dolžnikov in dokazovanja,
whereas, in the longer term, the use of IT in dispute resolution and settlement will necessitate fundamental changes in procedural law and in the way legislation is conceived and drafted, and efficient access to the law and justice will require the linking of registers (commercial and companies registers, land registers, registers of wills, etc.); whereas Parliament has already been concerned to make access to justice more compatible with the use of IT in its treatment of legislation on small claims, the European enforcement order and mediation; whereas the use of IT is be encouraged in all areas, including the submission, distribution and service of documents, the giving of evidence and the treatment of legal aid applications, and hence reflected in all future legislative proposals; whereas action in the areas of electronic acts, transparency of debtors' assets and evidence could already be contemplated,
ker je zamisel o ustanovitvi portala/omrežja e-sodstva dobrodošla, vendar je treba paziti, da bo zagotavljal bodisi izpolnjevanje potreb državljanov bodisi pravosodnih delavcev EU ter da bo olajšal dostop do sodnega varstva s pomočjo preglednih in enostavnih načinov dostopanja do informacij; ker bi bilo zato treba poenostaviti odnose med državljani EU in nacionalnimi javnimi organi, koristi od orodij e-sodstva pa bi morali v vsakdanjem življenju občutiti žrtve kaznivih dejanj, osumljenci in "uporabniki sodnega sistema" na splošno. ker bi bilo treba portal/omrežje za njegovo dejansko učinkovitost obenem vključiti v pilotski projekt v okviru vseevropskih omrežij iz člena 154 pogodbe ES in ga oblikovati s pomočjo interoperabilnostnih rešitev za evropske javne uprave, kot je predvideno v sporočilu Komisije z dne 29. septembra 2008 ( KOM(2008)0583 ),
whereas the idea of creating an e-Justice portal/network is welcome, but care must be taken to ensure that the needs of both EU citizens and EU legal practitioners are addressed and to facilitate access to justice by offering transparent and easy means of accessing information; whereas the relationship between EU citizens and national public authorities should thereby be facilitated, and victims of crimes, suspects and "justice users" in general should be able to benefit from EU-justice tools in their daily lives; whereas, at the same time, in order to be really effective, the portal/network should be inserted as a pilot project within the framework of the trans-European networks adumbrated in Article 154 of the EC Treaty and developed by interoperability solutions for European public administrations (ISA) as referred to in the Commission's communication of 29 September 2008 ( COM(2008)0583 ),
ker je treba upoštevati dejstvo, da ima dostop do interneta le 50 % evropskih državljanov in bi se morale storitve e-pravosodja razvijati in izvajati ob popolnem spoštovanju načela preglednosti, enakosti pred zakonom in javnega nadzora ter bi morale biti vsaj v prehodnem obdobju zgolj dopolnilo in dodatna možnost glede na utečeno prakso v državah članicah,
whereas, since only 50% of European citizens have access to the Internet, the development and implementation of e-Justice services should go hand in hand with absolute observance of the principles of transparency, equality before the law and public scrutiny and should, at least during the transitional period, be supplementary and optional in nature in relation to the practices pursued hitherto in the Member States,
ker so obstoječi portali zelo nerazviti, neurejeni in neprijazni do uporabnikov in ker bi bilo treba zaposliti najboljše strokovnjake s področja informacijske tehnologije, da se izboljša dostop do informacij, elektronskih sistemov in registrov; ker bi moral biti enotni evropski pravosodni portal, ki bi imel različne ravni dostopa za sodne in javne uslužbence, zaposlene v pravni in drugih strokah, ter državljane, zasnovan tako, da bi prepoznaval uporabnike in bi na ta način ločeval med področji za državljane in področji za ljudi iz stroke; ker bi moral biti glavni poudarek, kot nikoli doslej, na dostopnosti pravosodja za državljane in podjetja, četudi je bistveno, da se nadgradi in izboljša evropska pravosodna mreža,
whereas existing portals are primitive, cluttered and not user-friendly, and whereas the best minds in IT should be deployed to improve access to information, electronic systems and registers; whereas a single European justice portal, with differential access for the judiciary and civil servants, legal and other professionals and citizens should provide an identity management system to separate the citizens" area from the professionals" area; whereas although it is essential to build on and improve the European Judicial Network, the main emphasis, as never before, should be on access to justice by citizens and businesses,
ker je doseganje cilja vzpostavitve evropskega območja pravice v določeni meri upočasnjeno zaradi majhnega števila sodnih organov, ki imajo dostop do izobraževanja o pravosodju EU, elektronska orodja pa bi lahko znatno prispevala k vsesplošnem razširjanju evropske pravosodne kulture, ki je temelj prihodnjega evropskega območja pravice,
whereas attainment of the objective of creating a European area of justice is to a certain extent slowed down by the small number of judicial authorities who can access EU judicial training, and whereas electronic tools could contribute significantly to the widespread dissemination of a European judicial culture which is the basis of the future European area of justice,
ker je treba upoštevati precejšnje razlike v tem, kako natančno nacionalni sodniki v različnih državah članicah poznajo pravo Skupnosti, na kar je Evropski parlament opozoril v resoluciji z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
whereas regard should be had to the significant disparities in national judges" knowledge of Community law across the Member States, as highlighted by Parliament in its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
ker je treba takoj začeti z odpravljanjem bistvenih težav na področju e-pravosodja, tudi v zvezi z vprašanjem jezika,
whereas a start must be made immediately in tackling key issues in the field of e-Justice, including that of language,
ker so pravosodni ministri podprli decentraliziran pristop k razvoju e-pravosodja na evropski ravni z določeno mero osrednjega usklajevanja, ki bi omogočalo izmenjavo informacij na evropski ravni ter obenem dopuščalo neodvisno delovanje nacionalnih sistemov in se izogibalo bremenom, povezanim z oblikovanjem novega, centraliziranega sistema e-pravosodja v EU, in ker nekatere države članice dvostransko že sodelujejo; ker je delovna skupina Sveta prišla do zaključka, da bi morale biti pobude glede e-pravosodja neobvezujoče za države članice in jih ne bi smele obvezovati k uvedbi novih nacionalnih sistemov ali h korenitim spremembam obstoječih sistemov,
whereas the Ministers of Justice have endorsed a decentralised approach to developing e-Justice at European level, with some central coordination, enabling information to be shared at European level, whilst allowing the independent operation of national systems and avoiding the burdens inherent in the creation of a new, centralised EU e-Justice system, and whereas certain Member States are engaged in bilateral cooperation; whereas the Council Working Party has concluded that e-Justice initiatives should be non-compulsory for Member States, rather than obliging them to introduce new national systems or fundamentally changing existing ones,
ker se je informacijska tehnologija izkazala za učinkovito orodje pri obravnavanju mednarodnega kriminala, kot so pokazali rezultati, ki so bili na primer doseženi v okviru schengenskega informacijskega sistema in njegove poznejše nadgradnje; ker bi bilo treba visoko tehnologijo v celoti izkoristiti za preprečevanje mednarodnega kriminala in boj proti njemu, projektom, kot je na primer Evropski informacijski sistem kazenskih evidenc, pa bi bilo treba nameniti najširšo podporo, tudi s finančnega vidika,
whereas information technology has proved to be an effective tool in tackling transnational crime, as highlighted by the results achieved for instance by the Schengen Information System and its further developments; whereas the use of high technology in preventing and fighting transnational crime should be fully exploited and projects such as the European Criminal Records Information System should receive the widest support, including in financial terms,
ker sedanji sistem zbiranja dokazov v kazenskih postopkih v drugih državah članicah še vedno temelji na počasnih in neučinkovitih orodjih, ki jih ponuja vzajemna pomoč v kazenskih zadevah, in ker bi bila uporaba tehnoloških orodij, kot je videokonferenca, velik korak naprej pri zbiranju dokazov na daljavo, kadar bi bilo to potrebno in le, če ne bi bilo v škodo pravnemu položaju osebe, ki podaja izjavo,
whereas the current system of gathering criminal evidence in other Member States is still based on slow and ineffective instruments offered by mutual assistance in criminal matters, and whereas, where appropriate and only where it would not be detrimental to the legal position of the person giving testimony, the use of technological tools such as video conferencing would be a great step forward in the taking of evidence at a distance,
ker vzpostavitev evropskega območja pravice vpliva tudi na povečanje temeljnih pravic in postopkovnih jamstev za državljane EU, izvajanje strategije pa bi moralo potekati ob doslednem spoštovanju najvišjih standardov varovanja podatkov,
whereas the creation of a European area of justice also entails enhancing the fundamental rights and procedural safeguards of EU citizens, and whereas the strategy should be implemented in full compliance with the highest standards of data protection,
ker bi bilo treba hkrati z zakonodajnimi ukrepi za povečanje poznavanja kazenske zakonodaje drugih držav članic omogočiti dostopnost takšnega znanja na svetovnem spletu;
whereas legislative measures aimed at increasing knowledge of the criminal justice systems of the other Member States should go hand in hand with making such knowledge available online,
podpira načrte Komisije, še posebej predlog spodbujanja evropskega okvira za interoperabilnost v programu za interoperabilno zagotavljanje vseevropskih e-vladnih storitev javnim upravam, podjetjem in državljanom (IDABC) ter pri delu na področju elektronskega podpisa in elektronske identitete;
Endorses the Commission's plans, in particular the proposal to promote a European Interoperability Framework (EIF) within the IDABC programme and ongoing work on e-Signature and e-Identity;
vabi Komisijo, da evropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice dopolni z območjem e-sodstva, pri čemer naj:
Invites the Commission to complement the European area of justice, freedom and security with an area of e-Justice by:
sprejme konkretne ukrepe za izvajanje evropskega območja e-pravosodja,
taking concrete action with a view to the implementation of the European area of e-Justice;
jasno določi zadeve, zajete v ukrepih EU, na primer tako, da uporabi drugačno poimenovanje ali uporabi kratico "EU" skupaj z izrazom "e-pravosodje", da bi tako ločevali med izrazoma "e-pravosodje" ali "e-pravosodje EU",
clearly identifying matters covered by EU action by, for instance, using a different definition or prefixing the term "e-Justice" with "EU" so as to refer to "EU e-Justice" or "EU-Justice";
vzpostavi portal/omrežje e-pravosodja, obenem pa obravnava potrebe državljanov in pravosodnih delavcev EU ter zagotovi dostopnost preglednih in enostavnih načinov dostopa do informacij, pri čemer naj izkoristi vseevropska omrežja iz člena 154 Pogodbe ES, ki so bila razvita v okviru interoperabilnostnih rešitev za evropske javne uprave,
implementing the e-Justice portal/network while addressing the needs of both EU citizens and EU legal practitioners and ensuring that transparent and easy means to access information are available by taking advantage of the trans-European networks adumbrated in Article 154 of the EC Treaty and developed by ISA;
na široko uporablja elektronska orodja pri oblikovanju evropske pravosodne kulture,
making wide use of electronic tools in the development of a European judicial culture;
v celoti izkoristi potencial novih tehnologij za preprečevanje mednarodnega kriminala in boj proti njemu,
fully exploiting the potential of new technologies for preventing and fighting transnational crime;
nemudoma okrepi in zagotovi orodja za boljše zbiranje dokazov v drugih državah članicah, na primer videokonferenco,
enhancing and providing, without delay, tools such as video-conferencing for improving the taking of evidence in other Member States;
okrepi temeljne pravice in postopkovna jamstva v kazenskih postopkih in pri varstvu podatkov kot sestavni del pri pripravi in uresničevanju akcijskega načrta o pravosodju EU;
enhancing fundamental rights, procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings and data protection as an integral part of the drafting and implementation of the Action Plan on EU-justice;
meni, da bi moralo biti delo institucij bolj osredotočeno na državljane;
Considers that the work of the Institutions should be more strongly citizen-focused;
pozdravlja zanos držav članic pri oblikovanju dvostranskih projektov, ki bi jih kasneje lahko razširili na vse države članice in s katerimi bi lahko prišli do najboljših rezultatov za celotno EU, vendar opozarja, da lahko takšen pristop privede do razdrobljenosti, ter upa, da se bo temu izognilo;
Whilst welcoming the enthusiasm of Member States for the setting-up of bilateral projects which could later be expanded to include all Member States and therefore hopefully provide the optimum outcome for the EU as a whole, warns against the possible fragmentary effect of such an approach and trusts that this will be guarded against;
poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru e-pravosodja nameni ustrezno pozornost razvoju orodij za e-učenje, namenjenih zaposlenim v sodstvu;
Calls on the Commission to give the necessary attention to developing e-learning tools for the judiciary in the context of e-Justice;
meni, da zahtevani predlog nima finančnih posledic;
Considers that the proposal requested does not have any financial implications;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo in natančna priporočila, ki jo spremljajo, posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the accompanying detailed recommendations to the Commission and the Council and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
Če Svet ne bo izglasoval posebne resolucije o akcijskem načrtu, kjer bi pri izvedbi sodelovala Komisija, se Komisijo zaprosi, naj pripravi akcijski načrt o e-pravosodju na evropski ravni.
In the absence of a resolution voted by the Council on an action plan involving the Commission in its realisation, the Commission is asked to prepare an Action Plan on e-Justice at European level.
(Jasna opredelitev področja uporabe e-sodstva) Da bi se izognili nesporazumom, bi bilo treba jasno določiti zadeve, ki jih zajemajo ukrepi EU, na primer tako, da bi uporabili drugačno poimenovanje ali uporabili kratico "EU" skupaj z izrazom "e-pravosodje", da bi tako ločevali med izrazoma "e-pravosodje" ali "e-pravosodje EU";
(Clearly identifying the scope of e-Justice) In order to avoid misunderstandings, it would be appropriate to clearly identify matters covered by EU action by, for instance, using a different definition or prefixing the term "e-Justice" with "EU", so as to refer to "EU e-Justice" or "EU-Justice".
Kljub temu, da je vsak ukrep, ki si prizadeva za boljše medsebojno razumevanje informacij, dobrodošel, je treba posvetiti posebno pozornost jasni opredelitvi in omejitvi uporabe avtomatskega prevajanja, saj so lahko avtomatski prevodi včasih zavajajoči.
At the same time, whilst any measure aimed at improving mutual understanding of the information is welcome, attention must be paid to clearly defining and circumscribing the use of automatic translation systems, inasmuch as these sometimes produce "translations" which prove to be misleading.
Ukrep za primernost zakonodaje tudi v prihodnosti
Action to "future-proof" legislation
Podobno bi bilo treba ponovno pregledati uredbo o vročanju listin Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1348/2000 z dne 29. maja 2000 o vročanju sodnih in izvensodnih spisov v civilnih in trgovinskih zadevah v državah članicah (UL L 160, 30.6.2000, str.
Similarly, the Service of Documents Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 of 29 May 2000 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p.
in uredbo o civilnem dokaznem gradivu Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1206/2001 z dne 28. maja 2001 o sodelovanju med sodišči držav članic pri pridobivanju dokazov v civilnih ali gospodarskih zadevah (UL L 174, 27.6.2001, str.
and the Civil Evidence Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p.
To bi elektronskim trgovcem omogočilo, da ponudijo "modri gumb", s katerim bi lahko potrošniki (ali seveda drugi trgovci) sprejeli uporabo standardnega evropskega pogodbenega prava za svoje transakcije.
Ultimately, this would allow electronic traders to offer a "blue button" whereby consumers (or indeed other traders) could accept the application of standard European contract law to their transactions.
Evropski portal e-pravosodja za državljane
The European e-Justice Portal for Citizens
Varen evropski portal e-pravosodja
The secure European e-Justice Portal
Da bi se širila evropska pravosodna kultura in da bi dosegli čim več sodnih uradnikov že v trenutku začetka njihovega delovanja, bi moral vsak novo imenovani sodni uradnik prejeti neke vrste "opremo za preživetje" v obliki CD-ja ali ključa USB, ki bi vseboval pogodbo o EU, pogodbo o ES, temeljna besedila o pravosodnem sodelovanju ter informacije o pravosodnih sistemih drugih držav članic.
In order to spread the European judicial culture and with a view to reaching as many members of the judiciary as possible from the very first moment they join the judiciary, a sort of "survivor" kit in the form of a CD or USB key containing the EU Treaty and the EC Treaty, as well as the basic texts on judicial cooperation and information on the other Member States' judicial systems, should be given to any newly appointed member of the judiciary.
To strukturo je treba vzpostaviti čim prej.
which should be put in place without delay.
Kot je razvidno iz stališča Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o pobudi Kraljevine Belgije, Češke republike, Republike Estonije, Kraljevine Španije, Republike Francije, Republike Italije, Velikega vojvodstva Luksemburg, Kraljevine Nizozemske, Republike Avstrije, Republike Poljske, Republike Portugalske, Republike Slovenije, Republike Slovaške in Kraljevine Švedske za sprejetje Sklepa Sveta o okrepitvi Eurojusta in spremembi Sklepa 2002/187/PNZ ( P6_TA(2008)0384 ).
As reflected in Parliament's position of 2 September 2008 European Parliament position of 2 September 2008 on the initiative of the Kingdom of Belgium, the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic, the Italian Republic, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Poland, the Portuguese Republic, the Republic of Slovenia, the Slovak Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden with a view to adopting a Council Decision on the strengthening of Eurojust and amending Decision 2002/187/JHA (Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0384 ).
, je Eurojust ključni akter v boju proti mednarodnem kriminalu na ravni EU.
, Eurojust is a key player in the fight against transnational crime at EU level.
Strategija e-pravosodja ne more delovati brez uskladitve postopkovnih jamstev in ustreznih varoval za varstvo podatkov v okviru kazenskopravnega sodelovanja.
A real e-justice strategy cannot function without harmonisation of procedural safeguards and adequate data-protection safeguards applying to cooperation in criminal justice matters.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. decembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o čezmejnih posledicah pravnega varstva odraslih oseb ( 2008/2123(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on cross-border implications of the legal protection of adults ( 2008/2123(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Haaške konvencije z dne 13. januarja 2000 o mednarodnem varstvu odraslih oseb,
having regard to the Hague Convention of 13 January 2000 on the international protection of adults,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov, sprejete dne 13. decembra 2006,
having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities of 13 December 2006,
ob upoštevanju predloga sklepa Sveta o potrditvi Konvencije Združenih narodov o pravicah invalidov s strani Evropske skupnosti ( KOM(2008)0530 ),
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion, by the European Community, of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities ( COM(2008)0530 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 10. maja 2005 z naslovom: "Haaški program: Deset prednostnih nalog za naslednjih pet let.
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament of 10 May 2005 entitled "The Hague Programme: Ten priorities for the next five years.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0460/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0460/2008 ),
ker je v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu o haaškem programu Komisija kot eno izmed prednostnih nalog navedla, da je treba zajamčiti resnični evropski prostor za civilno pravosodje, še zlasti kar zadeva priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih odločb,
whereas in its aforesaid Communication on the Hague Programme, the Commission singled out, as one of its priorities, the need to guarantee an effective European area of civil justice, not least as regards the recognition and enforcement of judicial decisions,
ker je treba pri pripravi novih zakonodajnih predlogov upoštevati dejavnosti in posvetovanja, ki so bila v tem okviru izvedena glede odločb v zvezi z družinskim premoženjem, dedovanjem in oporokami,
whereas work and consultations have been conducted in that context on decisions concerning family property issues, successions and wills, with a view to drawing up new legislative proposals,
ker je treba spodbujati tudi priznavanje in izvrševanje sodnih ali administrativnih odločb v zvezi z osebami, ki jim je potrebno nuditi varstvo,
whereas there is also a need to promote the recognition and enforcement of legal or administrative decisions regarding persons who are the subject of protection measures,