natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker člen 5(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES predvideva sprejetje sprememb, potrebnih za prilagoditev priloge znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku s postopkom komitologije; ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES predvideva možnost izvzetja nevarnih snovi iz prepovedi, če zamenjava z varnejšimi alternativami ni možna Člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES določa "izvzeti materiale in komponente električne in elektronske opreme iz člena 4(1), če je tehnično ali znanstveno neizvedljivo, da se jih odstrani ali nadomesti s spremembo konstrukcije ali z materiali in komponentami, ki ne zahtevajo katerega od materialov ali snovi iz tega člena, ali kadar bi negativni vplivi na okolje, zdravje in/ali varnost potrošnika, ki bi jih povzročila nadomestitev, utegnili prevladati nad prednostmi za okolje, zdravje in/ali varnostjo potrošnika".
whereas Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for the adoption of any amendments necessary to adapt the Annex to scientific and technical progress by means of comitology; whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for the possibility of exempting hazardous substances from the prohibition if the substitution with safer alternatives is not practicable Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC states "exempting materials and components of electrical and electronic equipment from Article 4(1) if their elimination or substitution via design changes or materials and components which do not require any of the materials or substances referred to therein is technically or scientifically impracticable, or where the negative environmental, health and/or consumer safety impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the environmental, health and/or consumer safety benefits thereof".
; ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES določa edino merilo, ki ga je mogoče upoštevati pri dodajanju izjem v Prilogo s postopkom komitologije,
; whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC lays down the only criteria that can be taken into consideration with a view to adding exemptions to the Annex by means of comitology,
ker se v uvodni izjavi 2 predlagane odločbe navaja, da so nekateri materiali in komponente, ki vsebujejo določene nevarne snovi, izvzeti iz prepovedi, ker je "izločitev ali nadomestitev teh nevarnih snovi v navedenih posebnih materialih in komponentah še vedno neizvedljiva"; ker so v nasprotju s tem številne študije pokazale, da so varnejše alternative k DecaBDE v smislu člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES na razpolago za večino, če ne za vse uporabe polimerov v električni in elektronski opremi,
whereas Recital 2 of the proposed decision asserts that certain materials and components containing certain hazardous substances should be exempt from the prohibition, since the "elimination or substitution of these hazardous substances in those specific materials and components is still impracticable"; whereas several studies have shown to the contrary that safer alternatives to DecaBDE, which come within the scope of Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are available for many, if not all, polymeric applications in electrical and electronic equipment,
ker se v uvodni izjavi 3 predlagane odločbe trdi, da "ker je v oceni tveganja za DecaBDE (...) navedeno, da trenutno ni potrebe po ukrepih za znižanje tveganja za potrošnike (...), se DecaBDE lahko izvzame iz zahtev člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES"; ker je treba za splošne zakonodajne ukrepe v EU upoštevati vse dele znanstvenih ocen tveganja kot tudi mnenje ustreznega znanstvenega odbora; ker upoštevanje tveganja pri snovi, navedeni v členu 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES, ni vključeno v člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES in zato ne more služiti kot obrazložitev za spremembo priloge s postopkom komitologije; ker bi takšen pregled zahteval zakonodajni predlog na podlagi člena 251 Pogodbe,
whereas Recital 3 of the proposed decision asserts that "since the risk assessment of DecaBDE (…) has concluded that there is at present no need for measures to reduce risks for consumers (…), DecaBDE can be exempted from the requirements of Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC"; whereas all parts of scientific risk assessments as well as the opinion of the relevant scientific committee should be taken into account for general legislative measures in the EU; whereas risk considerations as such of a substance listed in Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are, however, not included in Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC and can therefore not serve as a justification for amending the Annex by means of comitology; whereas such a revision would require a legislative proposal pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty,
ker ne glede na nedopustnost premislekov glede tveganja v postopku komitologije predlagana odločitev ne upošteva ugotovitev dodatne ocene tveganja za okolje iz maja 2004, ki so pokazale, da je DecaBDE zelo obstojen, in ki so predstavile podatke o razširjenosti med največjimi plenilci in na Arktiki, nevrotoksičnih učinkih, zaužitju snovi s strani sesalcev v laboratorijskih raziskavah ter morebitno oblikovanje še bolj strupenih in akumulativnih izdelkov, kot so med drugim nizko bromirani difenil etri; ker sta trženje in uporaba vsega na trgu razpoložljivega nizko bromiranega difenil etra prepovedana z Direktivo 2003/11/ES od 15. avgusta 2004 dalje,
whereas, without prejudice to the non-admissibility of risk considerations in comitology procedure, the proposed decision ignores findings from the additional environment risk assessment of May 2004, which found DecaBDE to be very persistent, and which presented data on widespread occurrence in top predators and the Arctic, neurotoxic effects, uptake of the substance by mammals in laboratory studies and possible formation of more toxic and accumulative products such as inter alia lower brominated diphenyl ether congeners; whereas the marketing and use of all commercially available lower brominated diphenyl ether congeners has been banned by Directive 2003/11/EC as from 15 August 2004,
ker predlagana odločba nasprotuje mnenju znanstvenega odbora Komisije za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja z dne 18. marca 2005, ki močno priporoča nadaljnje zmanjšanje tveganja na osnovi zgornje ocene tveganja,
whereas the proposed decision goes against the opinion of 18 March 2005 of the Commission's own Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks, which "strongly recommends further risk reduction" on the basis of the above risk assessment,
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o patentabilnosti računalniško izvedenih izumov (11979/1/2004 – C6-0058/2005 – 2002/0047(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (11979/1/2004 – C6-0058/2005 – 2002/0047(COD) )
ob upoštevanju skupnega stališča Sveta (11979/1/2004 – C6-0058/2005 ),
having regard to the Council common position (11979/1/2004 – C6-0058/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave UL C 77 E, 26.3.2004, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 77 E, 26.3.2004, p.
o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0092 ) UL C 151 E, 25.6.2002, str.
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0092 ) OJ C 151 E, 25.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 61 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 61 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za pravne zadeve za drugo obravnavo ( A6-0207/2005 ),
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0207/2005 ),
zavrne skupno stališče;
Rejects the common position;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj zakonodajni postopek razglasi za končan in stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to declare the legislative procedure closed and to forward its position to the Council and Commission.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o oblikovanju Evropskega registra izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal ter o spremembi Direktiv Sveta 91/689/EGS in 96/61/ES ( KOM(2004)0634 – C6-0130/2004 – 2004/0231(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC ( COM(2004)0634 – C6-0130/2004 – 2004/0231(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0634 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0634 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0130/2004 ),
having regard to Articles 251(2) and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0130/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju Protokola ZN/EKE o registrih izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal,
having regard to the UN/ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenja Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0169/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0169/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora
Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the
v skladu s postopkom iz člena 251 Pogodbe Mnenje Evropskega parlamenta z dne
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty
6. junija 2005
Position of the European Parliament of 6 July 2005
Šesti okoljski akcijski program Skupnosti, sprejet s Sklepom št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta
The Sixth Community Environment Action Programme adopted by Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
z dne 22. julija 2002
of 22 July 2002
, zahteva, da se državljanom omogoči dostop do informacij o stanju v zvezi z gibanji v okolju glede na družbena, gospodarska in zdravstvena gibanja kakor tudi povečanje splošne ozaveščenosti o okolju.
requires supporting the provision of accessible information to citizens on the state on trends of the environment in relation to social, economic and health trends as well as the general raising of environmental awareness.
Konvencije OZN-EKE o dostopu do informacij, udeležbi javnosti pri odločanju in dostopu do pravnega varstva v okoljskih zadevah iz leta 1998 (Aarhuška konvencija), ki jo je dne 25. junija 1998 podpisala Evropska skupnost, priznava, da večji dostop javnosti do okoljskih informacij in širjenje takih informacij prispevata k večji ozaveščenosti o okoljskih zadevah, svobodni izmenjavi stališč, bolj učinkovitem sodelovanju javnosti pri odločanju o okoljskih zadevah in končno k boljšemu okolju.
The UN-ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Århus Convention), signed by the European Community on 25 June 1998, recognises that increased public access to environmental information and the dissemination of such information contribute to a greater awareness of environmental matters, a free exchange of views, more effective participation by the public in environmental decision-making and, eventually, to a better environment.
Celovit in usklajen RIPO zagotavlja
An integrated and coherent PRTR gives
industriji, znanstvenikom, zavarovalnicam, lokalnim organom oblasti, nevladnim organizacijam in drugim, ki odločajo, dobro zbirko podatkov za primerjave in prihodnje odločanje o okoljskih zadevah.
industry, scientists, insurance companies, local authorities, non-governmental organisations and other decision-makers a solid database for comparisons and future decisions in environmental matters.
Odločba Komisije 2000/479/ES z dne 17. julija 2000 o izvajanju Evropskega registra emisij onesnaževal (EPER) skladno s členom 15 Direktive Sveta 96/61/ES o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja okolja (IPPC) (
of 17 July 2000 on the implementation of a European pollutant emission register (EPER) according to Article 15 of Council Directive 96/61/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC) (
UL L 192, 28.7.2000, str.
OJ L 192, 28.7.2000, p.
Protokol RIPO izhaja iz istih načel kakor EPER, vendar ga še razširi z vključitvijo poročanja o več onesnaževalih, več dejavnosti, izpustov v tla, izpustov iz razpršenih virov in prenosov izven kraja nastanka.
The PRTR Protocol builds on the same principles as EPER, but goes beyond, by including reporting on more pollutants, more activities, releases to land, releases from diffuse sources and off-site transfers.
Konkretni in splošni cilji, ki jim sledi Evropski RIPO, so lahko doseženi le na podlagi zanesljivih in primerljivih podatkov.
The objectives and goals pursued by a European PRTR can only be achieved if data are reliable and comparable.
Zato je za zagotovitev kakovosti in primerljivosti podatkov potrebna ustrezna uskladitev zbiranja podatkov in sistema prenosa.
An adequate harmonisation of the data collection and transfer system is therefore needed to ensure the quality and comparability of data.
V skladu s Protokolom RIPO bi moral biti Evropski RIPO oblikovan tako, da bi omogočal kar najlažji javni dostop prek spleta.
In accordance with the PRTR Protocol the European PRTR should be designed for maximum ease of public access through the internet.
Izpusti in prenosi morajo biti zlahka prepoznavni v različnih oblikah, skupaj in posamezno, da bi lahko v razumnem času prišli do kar največ informacij.
Releases and transfers should be easily identified in different aggregated and non-aggregated forms in order to access a maximum of information in a reasonable time.
Evropski RIPO bi moral za nadaljnje spodbujanje ciljev omogočanja dostopa državljanom do informacij o stanju v zvezi z gibanji v okolju kakor tudi povečanja splošne ozaveščenosti o okolju vsebovati povezave z drugimi podobnimi zbirkami podatkov v državah članicah, državah nečlanicah in mednarodnih organizacijah.
In order to further promote the objective of supporting the provision of accessible information to citizens on the state on trends of the environment as well as the general raising of environmental awareness, the European PRTR should contain links to other similar databases in Member States, non-Member States and international organisations.
V skladu s Protokolom RIPO bi moral Evropski RIPO vsebovati tudi informacije o posameznih postopkih odstranjevanja odpadkov, o katerih je treba poročati kot o izpustih v tla
In accordance with the PRTR Protocol, the European PRTR should also contain information on specific waste disposal operations, to be reported as releases to land
Da bi dosegli cilj Evropskega RIPO o zagotavljanju zanesljivih informacij javnosti in omogočili sprejemanje na znanju temelječih odločitev, je treba zagotoviti razumne, vendar stroge časovne okvire za zbiranje podatkov in poročanje; to še posebno velja za poročanje držav članic Komisiji.
In order to achieve the objective of the European PRTR to provide reliable information to the public and to allow for knowledge-based decisions it is necessary to provide for reasonable but strict timeframes for data collection and reporting; this is particularly relevant for reporting by Member States to the Commission.
Poročanje o izpustih iz industrijskih obratov, čeprav še ni vedno dosledno, popolno ali primerljivo, je v mnogih državah članicah že ustaljen postopek.
Reporting of releases from industrial facilities, although not yet always consistent, complete and comparable, is a well established procedure in many Member States.
Kjer je to primerno,
Where appropriate,
biti kakovostni zlasti kar zadeva
their completeness
Zelo pomembno je uskladiti prihodnja prizadevanja nosilcev dejavnosti in držav članic, da bi izboljšali kakovost sporočenih podatkov.
It is of great importance to coordinate future efforts of both operators and Member States to improve the quality of the reported data.
Komisija bo zato skupaj z državami članicami začela delati na področju zagotavljanja kakovosti.
The Commission will therefore initiate work, together with the Member States, on quality assurance.
V skladu z Aarhuško konvencijo bi bilo treba javnosti omogočiti dostop do informacij, ki jih vsebuje Evropski RIPO, brez izražanja interesa, predvsem z zagotovitvijo, da Evropski RIPO mogoči neposreden elektronski dostop prek spleta.
In accordance with the Århus Convention, the public should be granted access to the information contained in the European PRTR without an interest to be stated, primarily by ensuring that the European PRTR provides for direct electronic access through Internet.
Dostop do informacij v Evropskem RIPO bi moral biti neomejen, izjeme pri tem pravilu pa bi bile mogoče le, kadar to izrecno dovoli veljavna zakonodaja Skupnosti.
Access to information provided by the European PRTR should be unrestricted and exceptions from this rule should only be possible where explicitly granted by existing Community legislation.
Predlagatelji bi morali imeti možnost zahtevati sodno revizijo dejanj ali opustitev dejanj javnih organov v zvezi z zahtevo.
Applicants should be able to seek an administrative or judicial review of the acts or omissions of a public authority in relation to a request.
na ravni Skupnosti, lahko Skupnost sprejme ukrepe v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti, kakor je določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe.
of the action to be taken, namely to enhance public access to environmental information through the establishment of an integrated, coherent Community-wide electronic database, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States, since the need for comparability of data throughout the Member States argues for a high level of harmonisation, and can therefore be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty.
V skladu z načelom sorazmernosti, kakor je določeno v navedenem členu, ta uredba ne presega potrebnega okvira za dosego
In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve
navedenega cilja
that objective
treba spremeniti Direktivo Sveta 91/689/EGS z dne 12. decembra 1991 o nevarnih odpadkih UL L 377, 31.12.1991, str.
Council Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on hazardous waste OJ L 377, 31.12.1991, p.
Direktivo 94/31/ES
by Directive
(UL L 168, 2.7.1994, str.
94/31/EC (OJ L 168, 2.7.1994, p.
in Direktivo Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja UL L 257, 10.10.1996, str.
and Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control OJ L 257, 10.10.1996, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo (ES) št. 1882/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 284, 31.10.2003, str.
Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1882/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 284, 31.10.2003, p.
Cilji Evropskega RIPO so med drugim informiranje javnosti o močnih emisijah onesnaževal, ki so zlasti posledica dejavnosti, zajetih z Direktivo 96/61/ES.
The European PRTR aims, among other things, at informing the public about important pollutant emissions due, in particular, to activities covered by Directive 96/61/EC.
Posledično bi v skladu s to uredbo javnost morala biti informirana o emisijah enot, zajetih s Prilogo I k zgoraj navedeni direktivi.
Consequently, under this Regulation, information should be provided to the public on emissions from installations covered by Annex I of that Directive.
Da bi se izognili podvajanju poročil, se lahko sistemi registrov izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal v skladu s Protokolom RIPO vključijo v mejah izvedljivosti v obstoječe informacijske vire, kot so mehanizmi poročanja v okviru dovoljenj ali uporabna dovoljenja.
To reduce duplicate reporting, pollutant release and transfer register systems may, under the PRTR Protocol, be integrated to the degree practicable with existing information sources such as reporting mechanisms under licences or operating permits.
V skladu s Protokolom RIPO določbe te uredbe ne bi smele vplivati na pravico držav članic do ohranitve ali uvedbe bolj obsežnega ali javnosti bolj dostopnega registra izpustov in prenosov onesnaževal, kakor ga zahteva Protokol –
In accordance with the PRTR Protocol, the provisions of this Regulation should not affect the right of the Member States to maintain or introduce a more extensive or more publicly accessible pollutant release and transfer register than required under the Protocol,
SPREJELA NASLEDNJO UREDBO: Člen 1
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Subject Matter
"javnost" pomeni eno ali več fizičnih ali pravnih oseb in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ali prakso njihova združenja, organizacije ali skupine;
"The public" means one or more natural or legal persons, and, in accordance with national legislation or practice, their associations, organisations or groups;
"kraj" pomeni zemljepisno lego
"Site" means the geographical location of the
"nosilec dejavnosti" pomeni katero koli fizično ali pravno osebo, ki upravlja ali nadzira obrat kot kompleks ali, kadar je tako predvideno v nacionalni zakonodaji, na katero je bila prenesena ekonomska pristojnost za tehnično delovanje obrata;
"Operator" means any natural or legal person who operates or controls the facility or, where this is provided for in national legislation, to whom decisive economic power over the technical functioning of the facility has been delegated;
"leto poročanja" pomeni koledarsko leto, za katero je treba zbrati podatke o izpustih onesnaževal in njihovih prenosih izven kraja nastanka;
"Reporting year" means the calendar year for which data on releases of pollutants and off-site transfers must be gathered;
"snov" pomeni kateri koli kemijski element in njegove spojine, razen radioaktivnih snovi;
"Substance" means any chemical element and its compounds, with the exception of radioactive substances;
) "odpadki" pomenijo snovi ali predmete, kakor so opredeljeni v členu 1(a) Direktive
"Waste" means any substance or object as defined in Article 1(a) of
z dne 15. julija 1975 o odpadkih
of 15 July 1975 on waste
) "odpadna voda" pomeni komunalno odpadno vodo, odpadno vodo iz gospodinjstev in industrijsko odpadno vodo, kakor je opredeljena v členu 2 Direktive
"Waste water" means urban, domestic and industrial waste water, as defined in Article 2 of
91/271/EGS z dne 21. maja 1991 o čiščenju komunalne odpadne vode UL L 135, 30.5.1991, str.
Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p.
) "odstranjevanje" pomeni vsakega od postopkov, predvidenih v Prilogi
"Disposal" means any of the operations provided for in Annex II, A
k Direktivi 75/442/EGS.
Directive 75/442/EEC.
Evropski RIPO vključuje informacije o:
The European PRTR shall include information on:
člena 8(1), kadar so na voljo.
referred to in Article 8(1)
Člen 4 Oblika in struktura
Article 4 Design and Structure
, vključno z njegovim matičnim podjetjem, kadar je to primerno,
, including the facility's parent company where applicable,
in zemljepisno lego obrata
and its geographical location
, vključno z porečjem, kjer je to primerno
, including the river basin where applicable
onesnaževalo ali odpadke, kakor je ustrezno;
pollutant or waste, as appropriate;
posamezne okoljske medije, v katere se izpušča onesnaževalo, in
each environmental media into which the pollutant is released;
prenose odpadkov izven kraja nastanka in njihov namembni kraj, kakor je ustrezno;
off-site transfers of waste and their destination, as appropriate;
onesnaževal v
pollutants in
izven kraja nastanka;
waste water;
lastnika ali upravljavca obrata.
facility owner or operator.
zlahka dostopne
the Internet and