natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Od leta 2005 dalje za večja podjetja, ki proizvajajo ali porabljajo energijo, velja enotna evropska cena ogljikovega dioksida znotraj evropskega sistema trgovanja z emisijami (ETS).
Since 2005 a uniform European carbon price has applied under the Emissions Trading Scheme to large energy-producing and energy-consuming companies.
Zaprte nemške jedrske elektrarne bodo po predvidevanjih v prihodnosti nadomeščene z elektrarnami, ki bodo bazirale na premogu in plinu, pri čemer bo cena dovoljenih izpustov za okoli 11.000 podjetij po Evropi narasla.
The nuclear power stations that Germany intends to shut down are expected to be replaced in future by coal- and gas-fired power stations, leading to a rise in the cost of permitted emissions for around 11 000 companies across Europe.
Poleg tega moramo upoštevati tudi posredne učinke emisij ogljikovega dioksida na ceno elektrike.
In addition, we also have to take into account the indirect effects of carbon dioxide emissions on the price of electricity.
Ali ima Komisija oceno, kakšne bodo posledice zaprtja jedrskih elektrarn v Nemčiji za notranji evropski energetski trg? 2.
Does it have an estimate of the consequences for the European internal energy market of the closure of Germany’s nuclear power stations? 2.
Kakšne bodo širše posledice zaprtja jedrskih elektrarn v Nemčiji (za gospodarstvo, gospodinjstva, konkurenčnost, delovna mesta itd.)?
What will be the broader consequences of closing Germany’s nuclear power stations (for the economy, households, competition, jobs, etc.)?
Države članice so pristojne za mešanico energetskih virov in so neodvisne v svojih odločitvah.
Member States are responsible for the energy mix and sovereign in their decisions.
Komisija ne posega v posamezne odločitve držav članic, če so te v skladu z zakonodajo EU in Euratomom.
The Commission does not interfere with individual decisions of Member States as long as these are in line with EU and Euratom legislation.
Komisija trenutno v tesnem sodelovanju z ENTSO-E ocenjuje, ali obstaja kakršen koli vpliv na stabilnost omrežja in zanesljivost oskrbe.
In the short term, the Commission is assessing in close cooperation with ENTSO-E whether there is any impact on grid stability and security of supply.
Kot kaže, to ne velja za poletno sezono.
This appears not to be the case for this summer season.
Komisija z državami članicami, nacionalnimi regulativnimi organi in ENTSO-E trenutno tudi ocenjuje, kateri ukrepi so morda potrebni za srednje- in dolgoročno zagotovitev primernosti proizvodnje in omrežja, pri čemer upošteva nacionalne odločitve o proizvodni zmogljivosti v Nemčiji in drugod.
The Commission is also assessing with the Member States, national regulators and ENTSO-E what measures may be needed to ensure generation and grid adequacy in the medium and longer term taking into account national decisions on generation capacity in Germany and elsewhere.
Na splošno se Komisija in države članice strinjajo, da mora energetska politika zagotavljati trajnost, zanesljivost oskrbe in konkurenčnost.
Generally, the Commission and the Member States agree that energy policy needs to ensure sustainability, security of supply and competitiveness.
Za to so potrebni različni ukrepi, vključno s popolnim povezovanjem notranjega trga, ukrepi za energetsko učinkovitost in tehnološki razvoj.
For this, various measures are needed including the full integration of the internal market, energy efficiency measures and technology development.
Zlasti ukrepi za energetsko učinkovitost na ravni držav članic in evropski ravni lahko pripomorejo k zmanjšanju stroškov električne energije.
Especially energy efficiency measures, both at member states' level and on European level, can help to decrease energy costs.
Komisija bo še naprej razvijala ukrepe za okoljsko primerno zasnovo in energetsko označevanje ter je 22. junija 2011 predlagala nov pravni okvir za energetsko učinkovitost.
The Commission will continue to develop eco-design and energy labelling measures and has proposed a new legal framework for energy efficiency on 22 June 2011.
Tehnološki razvoj in nadaljnje povezovanje trgov lahko prav tako prispeva k ustvarjanju novih delovnih mest v energetskem sektorju.
Technology development and further market integration can also help the creation of new jobs in the energy sector.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006646/2011
Question for written answer E-006646/2011
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Norica Nicolai (ALDE) , Kristiina Ojuland (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Renate Weber (ALDE) in Barbara Lochbihler (Verts/ALE)
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Norica Nicolai (ALDE) , Kristiina Ojuland (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Renate Weber (ALDE) and Barbara Lochbihler (Verts/ALE)
(6. julij 2011)
(6 July 2011)
Zadeva: Sporazum o sodelovanju med Bosno in Hercegovino ter Iranom
Subject: Cooperation agreement between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iran
Dne 14. junija 2011 je bilo objavljeno http://www.neurope.eu/articles/Iran-Bosnia-Sign-Judiciary-agreement/107172.php , da je Bosna in Hercegovina z Iranom podpisala sporazum o medsebojnem sodelovanju v pravosodnih zadevah.
On 14 June 2011 it was reported http://www.neurope.eu/articles/Iran-Bosnia-Sign-Judiciary-agreement/107172.php that Bosnia and Herzegovina had signed an agreement with Iran concerning mutual cooperation on judicial matters (‘the Agreement’).
Sporazum, ki sta ga podpisala iranski minister za pravosodje Morteza Bakhtiari in njegov bosanski kolega Bariša Čolak, po poročanju vključuje sodelovanje med gospodarskima zbornicama obeh držav ter sodelovanje na področju prometa in komunikacij, bančništva in zavarovalništva, industrije, turizma ter znanosti in tehnologije.
The Agreement, signed by Iranian Justice Minister Morteza Bakhtiari and his Bosnian counterpart Barisa Colak, reportedly covers cooperation between the countries’ chambers of commerce and cooperation on transport and communication, banking and insurance, industry, tourism and science and technology.
Iranski režim je odgovoren za hude in sistematične kršitve človekovih pravic, kot dokazujejo številne zunajsodne usmrtitve, razširjena uporaba mučenja in drugih oblik krutega, nečloveškega in poniževalnega ravnanja v iranskih zaporih, ter sistematično nasilno zatiranje iranskih državljanov, ki udejanjajo svoji legitimni pravici do svobode izražanja in mirnega zbiranja.
The Iranian regime is guilty of grave and systematic violations of human rights, as evidenced by numerous extrajudicial executions, the widespread use of torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in Iranian prisons, and the systematic violent repression of Iranian citizens exercising their legitimate rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.
Ob upoštevanju številnih gospodarskih in trgovinskih sankcij, ki veljajo proti Iranu, iranskim uradnikom in iranskim državnim podjetjem – vključno s sankcijami OZN in drugimi mednarodnimi sankcijami ter usmerjenimi sankcijami EU – zaradi kršitev človekovih pravic in zaradi iranskega jedrskega programa ter ob upoštevanju, da je od zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Solunu junija 2003 Bosna in Hercegovina potencialna država kandidatka za pristop k EU, s katero je junija 2008 podpisala stabilizacijsko-pridružitveni sporazum, EU ne more sprejeti sporazuma in bi morala to glasno povedati ter ukrepati.
Given the host of economic and trade sanctions that have been imposed on Iran, Iranian officials and Iranian state companies — including UN and other international sanctions and targeted EU sanctions — in response to both human rights violations and the Iranian nuclear programme, and given that, since the Thessaloniki Council of June 2003, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been a potential candidate country for accession to the EU, with which it signed a stabilisation and association agreement in June 2008, the EU cannot accept the Agreement, and ought to speak out and take action.
Ali se komisar za širitev in evropsko sosedsko politiko strinja, da sporazum krši sankcije OZN, in če ne, zakaj ne?
Does the Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy (‘the Commissioner’) agree that the Agreement violates UN sanctions and, if not, why not?
Ali se komisar strinja, da podpis sporazuma spodkopava pozitivni učinek stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega sporazuma in bi lahko imel velik vpliv na status Bosne in Hercegovine kot potencialne države kandidatke?
Does the Commissioner agree that the signing of the Agreement undermines the positive influence of the stabilisation and association agreement and may have a significant impact on the potential candidate status of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Če ne, zakaj ne?
If not why not?
Ali se je vlada Bosne in Hercegovine posvetovala s komisarjem oziroma ga je obvestila o svoji nameri, da podpiše sporazum?
Did the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina consult the Commissioner about, or inform him of, its intention to sign the Agreement?
Ali bo komisar pritisnil na vlado Bosne in Hercegovine, naj prekliče sporazum, in če ne, zakaj ne?
Will the Commissioner push the Government of Bosnia and Herzegovina to cancel the Agreement and, if not, why not?
Ali se komisar strinja, da je sporazum škodljiv za prizadevanja Bosne in Hercegovine, da se pridruži EU, in če ne, zakaj ne?
Does the Commissioner agree that the Agreement is counterproductive with regard to Bosnia and Herzegovina’s ambition to join the EU and, if not why not?
(31. avgust 2011)
(31 August 2011)
Komisija je preučila sporazum med Bosno in Hercegovino ter Iranom o medsebojnem sodelovanju v pravosodnih zadevah, ki je enak prejšnjim sporazumom, ki jih je Bosna in Herzegovina podpisala z drugimi tretjimi državami.
The Commission has examined the agreement between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iran on judicial cooperation, identical to previous agreements signed by Bosnia and Herzegovina with other third states.
Službe Komisije so namenile posebno pozornost vprašanju izročitve, pri čemer je v členu 37 sporazuma navedeno, da če je v zakonodaji ene pogodbenice za določeno kaznivo dejanje predpisana smrtna kazen, v zakonodaji zaprošene pogodbenice pa ne, izročitev ni dovoljena, razen če se ne zagotovi, da se smrtna kazen ne bo izvršila.
Particular attention has been attached by Commission services to the issue of extradition, where Article 37 of the agreement states that, when the legislation of a party prescribes the death penalty for a given offence whereas the legislation of the requested party does not, extradition shall not be permitted unless assurances are provided that the capital punishment will not be carried out.
Kot članica Sveta Evrope Bosna in Hercegovina v skladu z Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah in njenimi ustreznimi dodatnimi protokoli ne sme izrekati smrtne kazni..
As a member of the Council of Europe, Bosnia and Herzegovina cannot apply the death penalty, in line with the European Convention on Human Rights and its relevant additional protocols.
Na splošno se od Bosne in Hercegovine kot potencialne države kandidatke za pristop k EU pričakuje, da svojo politiko do Irana uskladi s politiko Unije.
More generally, as a potential candidate country, Bosnia and Herzegovina would be expected to align itself to the policy of the European Union towards Iran.
Bosna in Hercegovina mora pri tem zagotoviti, da dejansko izvajanje sporazumov z Islamsko republiko Iran ne krši sankcij Združenih narodov (OZN) ali da ne nasprotuje zadevnim sklepom Sveta Evropske unije.
In this respect Bosnia and Herzegovina should ensure that the actual implementation of the agreements with the Islamic Republic of Iran does not breach relevant United Nations (UN) sanctions or contravene related Decisions by the Council of the European Union.
Komisija bo to vprašanje še naprej spremljala v okviru rednega dialoga z Bosno in Hercegovino na vseh ustreznih srečanjih, organiziranih v okviru stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa.
The Commission will continue to monitor the issue in the framework of the regular dialogue with Bosnia and Herzegovina, in all relevant meetings organised under the framework of the Association and Stabilisation Process.
Komisija poleg tega zahteva podroben pregled vseh obstoječih sporazumov in memorandumov o soglasju, ki trenutno veljajo med Bosno in Hercegovino ter Islamsko republiko Iran.
The Commission has also requested a detailed overview of all existing agreements and memoranda of understanding currently in place between Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Komisija bo po potrebi zahtevala dodatne informacije o stanju medsebojnega sodelovanja z Islamsko republiko Iran, še posebno na področjih, za katera veljajo sankcije OZN.
If necessary, the Commission will request additional information on the state of cooperation with the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly in areas affected by relevant UN sanctions.
Komisija bo še naprej pozorno spremljala napredek Bosne in Hercegovine v zvezi s københavnskimi političnimi merili, Listino Unije o temeljnih pravicah ter drugimi zadevnimi konvencijami in protokoli Sveta Evrope, vključno s pravosodnim sodelovanjem v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah s tretjimi državami.
In particular, the Commission will continue to monitor thoroughly progress by Bosnia and Herzegovina in relation to the Copenhagen political criteria, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights and other relevant Council of Europe conventions and protocols, including on judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters with third countries.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006694/2011
Question for written answer E-006694/2011
(13. julij 2011)
(13 July 2011)
Zadeva: Srbski kazenski zakonik in premoženjske pravice
Subject: The Serbian Criminal Code and property rights
Obstajajo zanesljivi znaki, da deli srbskega kazenskega zakonika – in sicer uporaba člena 359 (zloraba uradnega položaja) za upravljanje javnih podjetij in pravilnik o priporu v predkazenskem postopku – niso v skladu z načeli pravne države.
There are credible indications that parts of Serbia’s Criminal Code — namely the application of Article 359 (abuse of office) to the management of private companies, and the rules on pre‑trial detention — are not compatible with the principles of the rule of law.
Srbski državni sekretar za pravosodje Slobodan Homen je pred kratkim napovedal spremembe na tem področju na podlagi priporočil EU.
The Serbian State Secretary for Justice, Slobodan Homen, has recently stated that there will be changes in this area following recommendations from the EU.
Srbski organi prav tako le počasi pojasnjujejo nekatere postopke proti posameznikom – tak je primer Djordjević.
Furthermore, the Serbian authorities have been slow in clarifying certain cases brought against individuals — the Djordjević case being an example.
Potem ko je Djordjević za zaščito svojih premoženjskih pravic sprožil sodni postopek zoper srbsko agencijo za privatizacijo, je na podlagi obdolžitve, da je vodstvo podjetja nagovarjal k zlorabi uradnega položaja, devet mesecev ostal v priporu.
After taking legal action against the Serbian privatisation agency in an attempt to protect his property rights, Mr Djordjević was accused of inciting company management to abuse of office and detained for nine months.
Taki primeri kažejo na negotovost naložbenega okolja v Srbiji, zlasti glede privatizacije, in vzbujajo pomisleke o neodvisnosti pravosodnega sistema.
Cases such as these highlight the insecurity of the investment climate in Serbia, particularly with regard to privatisation, and raise concerns about the independence of the justice system.
Ali je Komisija nekatere določbe srbskega kazenskega zakonika opredelila kot problematične in nezdružljive z načeli pravne države?
Has the Commission identified certain provisions of the Serbian Criminal Code as problematic and incompatible with the principles of the rule of law?
Če da, katere?
If so, which provisions?
Kako in v kakšnem časovnem okviru namerava Komisija spremljati napredek, ki ga je napovedal državni sekretar za pravosodje, zlasti glede postopkov, ki potekajo na podlagi člena 359?
How and in what timeframe does the Commission intend to monitor the developments announced by the State Secretary for Justice, in particular in relation to ongoing cases based on Article 359?
Ali bodo ta področja obravnavana v mnenju Komisije o Srbiji, ki se pričakuje oktobra 2011?
Will these areas be addressed in the Commission opinion about Serbia expected in October 2011?
Kakšne ukrepe namerava Komisija sprejeti za zagotovitev, da bo varovanje premoženjskih pravic zasebnih vlagateljev v Srbiji usklajeno s standardi EU?
What steps is the Commission considering to ensure that implementation of the protection of private investors’ property rights in Serbia is brought into line with EU standards?
Komisija pozorno spremlja spoštovanje pravne države v Srbiji.
The Commission closely monitors the respect of the rule of law in Serbia.
Bila je opozorjena na domnevno neskladnost nekaterih določb v srbskem kazenskem zakoniku, zlasti člena 359, s standardi EU.
Allegations of certain provisions of the Serbian Criminal Code, in particular Article 359, violating EU standards were brought to the Commission's attention.
V členu 359 kazenskega zakonika je zloraba uradnega položaja tako v javnem kot v zasebnem sektorju opredeljena kot kaznivo dejanje.
Article 359 of the Criminal Code renders abuse of office in both the public and the private sector, a criminal offence.
Pravni red EU ne opredeljuje niti dodatno ne ureja pojma „zloraba uradnega položaja“, vendar imajo nekatere države članice zakonske določbe, ki so podobne členu 359 srbskega kazenskega zakonika.
While the term ‘abuse of office’ is neither defined nor further regulated in the EU acquis, there are Member States who have provisions similar to Serbian Article 359.
Ta vključuje širšo opredelitev pojma kaznivega dejanja in področje njegove uporabe v zasebnem sektorju.
This includes the broad definition of an offence and its coverage of the private sector.
Vsekakor pa delovna skupina, ki pripravlja osnutke sprememb srbskega kazenskega zakonika, trenutno pregleduje člen 359.
However, a working group preparing draft changes to the Serbian Criminal Code is currently reviewing Article 359.
Komisija bo v okviru stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa še naprej spremljala prihodnji razvoj na področju pravne države in zlasti morebitne spremembe kazenskega zakonika.
The Commission, within the framework of the Stabilisation and Association Process, will continue to monitor any future developments in the rule of law area and particularly possible changes to the Criminal Code.
Kakor je bilo napovedano v strateškem dokumentu o širitvi za leti 2010–2011, se je začel dialog o pravni državi.
As announced in the 2010‑11 Enlargement Strategy Paper, a dialogue on rule of law was launched.
Ta bo omogočil samodejno uporabljanje orodij za spremljanje, kot so strokovni pregledi.
This will automatically use monitoring tools such as peer assessment missions.
Novim državam pristopnicam bo omogočil ustrezno svetovanje glede vprašanj, ki zadevajo pravno državo.
It will ensure the provision of appropriate advice to enlargement countries on rule of law-related issues.
Komisija bo v svojem prihodnjem mnenju o prošnji Srbije za članstvo v EU poročala o vseh pomembnih vidikih københavnskih meril.
In its upcoming Opinion on the Serbian application for EU membership, the Commission will report on all relevant aspects of the Copenhagen criteria.
Ta vključujejo spoštovanje pravne države in premoženjskih pravic.
These include respect for rule of law and property rights.
Komisija je večkrat izpostavila nekatere pomanjkljivosti v srbskem pravnem okviru.
The Commission has repeatedly outlined certain shortcomings within the Serbian legislative framework.
Te ustvarjajo negotovost v zvezi s premoženjskimi pravicami in negativno vplivajo na naložbeno okolje.
This creates uncertainty in relation to property rights and affects the investment climate negatively.
Poleg tega ni jasnega odgovora na odprto vprašanje vračanja premoženja, ki je bilo nacionalizirano pod komunističnim režimom.
It also includes lacking a clear solution to the outstanding question of property restitution nationalised under the communist regime.
Komisija je srbske oblasti na to opozorila vsakič, ko je za to imela priložnost.
The Commission urged the Serbian authorities on every possible occasion.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-006908/2011
Question for written answer E-006908/2011
Nathalie Griesbeck (ALDE) , Cecilia Wikström (ALDE) , Marielle De Sarnez (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , baronica Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Jelko Kacin (ALDE) , Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE) , Kristiina Ojuland (ALDE) , Louis Michel (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) in Sir Graham Watson (ALDE)
Nathalie Griesbeck (ALDE) , Cecilia Wikström (ALDE) , Marielle De Sarnez (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Jelko Kacin (ALDE) , Ramon Tremosa i Balcells (ALDE) , Kristiina Ojuland (ALDE) , Louis Michel (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) and Sir Graham Watson (ALDE)
Zadeva: Podpora EU beguncem in procesu prehoda v demokracijo v Tuniziji
Subject: EU support to refugees and to the democratic transition process in Tunisia
EU je 14. januarja 2011 razglasila svojo zavezanost podpori demokratičnemu procesu v Tuniziji.
From 14 January 2011, the EU has announced its commitment to supporting the democratic process in Tunisia.
EU je dostavljala humanitarno pomoč, namenjeno več stotisočem beguncem, ki so v Tunizijo prispeli od začetka vstaje in spopadov v Libiji, ter prispevala k ustanavljanju begunskih taborišč in vračanju državljanov tretjih držav v njihove matične države.
The EU delivered humanitarian aid for the reception of hundreds of thousands of refugees arriving in Tunisia since the uprising and the fighting in Libya, and contributed to the creation of refugee camps and the repatriation of third‑country nationals to their country of origin.
Predstavnik Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje je 15. junija 2011 v Pododboru Evropskega parlamenta za človekove pravice poročal, da je v taboriščih še vedno 6 000 ljudi, obljubljeno pa je bilo, da bodo 780 beguncev preselili.
On 15 June 2011 in Parliament’s Subcommittee on Human Rights, the European External Action Service (EEAS) representative reported that 6 000 persons were still present in the camps, and that promises for the resettlement of 780 refugees had been made.
Ali lahko Komisija navede države, ki so se zavezale, da bodo sprejele begunce?
Can the Commission indicate which Member States pledged to take in refugees?
Ali lahko Komisija Parlament obvesti o trenutnem stanju razprav s Svetom in državami članicami o selitvi beguncev z odobrenim sprejemom?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the state of play of the discussions with the Council and the Member States on the reception of refugees whose case has been accepted?
EU je hkrati napovedala, da bo poleg humanitarne pomoči omogočila tudi finančno podporo za reševanje gospodarske krize, ki je posledica izpada prihodkov v turizmu in upada trgovine z Libijo.
The EU also announced that in addition to humanitarian aid, financial support would be made available to address the economic crisis resulting from the fall of resources generated by tourism and the decline in trade with Libya.
Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje je Pododboru za človekove pravice potrdila, da so bili finančni instrumenti opredeljeni.
The EEAS services confirmed to the Subcommittee on Human Rights that the financial instruments had been identified.
Vendar sredstva še vedno niso bila sproščena.
However, the funds have not yet been released.
Ali lahko Komisija Parlamentu sporoči datum sprostitve teh sredstev?
Can the Commission inform Parliament about the date for the release of the funds?
(30. avgust 2011)
(30 August 2011)
Komisija je 12. maja 2011 organizirala donatorsko ministrsko konferenco, na kateri so države članice in pridružene države za begunce, ki so ostali v severni Afriki, obljubile skupaj 718 mest za preselitev.
The Commission organised a Ministerial Pledging Conference on 12 May 2011, where 718 resettlement places were pledged in total by the Member States and Associated Countries in favour of stranded refugees in North Africa.