natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
izraža prepričanje, da bi edino okrepljen organ za človekove pravice v Parlamentu lahko spodbujal skladno, učinkovito, sistematično in prečno politiko človekovih pravic znotraj Parlamenta in v odnosu do Sveta in Komisije, zlasti glede na določbe Lizbonske pogodbe v zvezi z zunanjo politiko;
Is convinced that only a strengthened human rights body in Parliament would be able to promote a coherent, effective, systematic and cross-cutting human rights policy within Parliament and vis-à-vis the Council and Commission, in particular in the light of the foreign policy provisions of the Lisbon Treaty;
pozdravlja vzpostavitev Mreže Saharov, razglašene ob praznovanju 20. obletnice nagrade Saharova; meni, da bi morala hitro odločiti o načinu svojega delovanja in zagotoviti sredstva, potrebna za doseganje svojih ciljev; ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da se vsem dobitnikom nagrade Saharova, še zlasti Aung San Suu Kyi, Oswaldu Joséju Payi Sardiñasu, kubanski organizaciji Dame v belem in Hu Jiaju, omogoči obisk evropskih institucij; obžaluje, da se kitajske, burmanske in kubanske oblasti niso ustrezno odzvale na pozive Evropske unije k spoštovanju temeljnih svoboščin, še posebej svobode izražanja in političnega združevanja;
Welcomes the setting-up of the Sakharov Network, as announced on the 20th anniversary of the Sakharov Prize; believes that it should quickly decide on its operating arrangements and put in place the resources necessary to achieve its objectives; reiterates its demand that all winners of the Sakharov Prize and, in particular, Aung San Suu Kyi, Oswaldo José Payá Sardiñas, the Cuban collective Damas de Blanco and Hu Jia be given access to the European institutions; deplores the absence of any significant response to the EU's calls made to the Chinese, Burmese and Cuban authorities to respect fundamental freedoms, especially freedom of expression and political association;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in držav kandidatk, Združenim narodom, Svetu Evrope, Organizaciji za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter vladam držav in ozemelj, omenjenih v tej resoluciji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the candidate countries, to the United Nations, the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, and to the governments of the countries and territories mentioned in this resolution.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 7. maja 2009 Svetu o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU ( 2009/2012(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation of 7 May 2009 to the Council on development of an EU criminal justice area ( 2009/2012(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU, ki ga v imenu skupine PPE-DE podal Panayiotis Demetriou ( B6-0335/2008 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Panayiotis Demetriou on behalf of the PPE-DE Group on the development of an EU criminal justice area ( B6-0335/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 6, 29, 31(1)(c) ter 34(2)(a) in (b) Pogodbe EU, Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členov 47, 48, 49 in 50, ter Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zlasti členov 5, 6, 7 in 13,
having regard to Articles 6, 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(a) and (b)of the EU Treaty, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50, and to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, notably Articles 5, 6, 7 and 13,
ob upoštevanju zelenih knjig Komisije z dne 19. februarja 2003 o postopkovnem jamstvu za osumljence in obtožence v kazenskih postopkih po vsej Evropski uniji ( KOM(2003)0075 ) ter z dne 26. aprila 2006 o domnevi nedolžnosti ( KOM(2006)0174 ), predloga Komisije za Okvirni sklep Sveta o določenih procesnih pravicah pri kazenskih postopkih na celotnem območju Evropske unije ( KOM(2004)0328 ) in stališča Parlamenta z dne 12. aprila 2005 o tem UL C 33 E, 9.2.2006, str.
having regard to the Commission Green Papers of 19 February 2003 on Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union ( COM(2003)0075 ) and of 26 April 2006 on the Presumption of Innocence ( COM(2006)0174 ), to the Commission proposal for a Council framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union ( COM(2004)0328 ) and Parliament's position of 12 April 2005 thereon OJ C 33 E, 9.2.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila z dne 9. marca 2004 Svetu o pravicah zapornikov v Evropski uniji UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
having regard to its recommendation of 9 March 2004 to the Council on the rights of prisoners in the European Union OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/909/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji UL L 327, 5.12.2008, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p.
ter stališča Parlamenta z dne 2. septembra 2008 o tem Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0381 .
and to Parliament's position of 2 September 2008 thereon Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0381 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Evropske komisije Sveta Evrope za učinkovitost sodstva iz leta 2008 z naslovom "Evropski pravosodni sistemi: učinkovitost ali pravičnost",
having regard to the 2008 report of the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) of the Council of Europe entitled "European judicial systems: Efficiency of justice",
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 4. februarja 2008 o ustanovitvi foruma za razpravo o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja ( KOM(2008)0038 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 4 February 2008 on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice ( COM(2008)0038 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve z dne 27. in 28. novembra 2008 o vzpostavitvi mreže zakonodajnega sodelovanja med ministrstvi za pravosodje držav članic Evropske unije,
having regard to the Conclusions of the JHA Council of 27-28 November 2008 on the establishment of a Network for legislative cooperation between the Ministries of Justice of the Member States of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju pobude Francoske republike o sprejetju sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi evropske pravosodne mreže UL C 18, 19.1.2001, str.
having regard to the Initiative of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council Decision setting up a European judicial training network OJ C 18, 19.1.2001, p.
, stališča Parlamenta z dne 24. septembra 2002 v zvezi s tem UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
, to Parliament's position of 24 September 2002 thereon OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
, sporočila Komisije z dne 29. junija 2006 o usposabljanju na področju pravosodja v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2006)0356 ) in resolucije Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic, ki so se sestali v okviru Sveta, o usposabljanju sodnikov, tožilcev in pravosodnega osebja v Evropski uniji UL C 299, 22.11.2008, str.
, to the Commission Communication of 29 June 2006 on judicial training in the European Union ( COM(2006)0356 ) and to the Resolution of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on the training of judges, prosecutors and judicial staff in the European Union OJ C 299, 22.11.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. julija 2008 o vlogi nacionalnih sodnikov v evropskem sodnem sistemu Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
having regard to its resolution of 9 July 2008 on the role of the national judge in the European judicial system Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0352 .
, da bi se oblikovala pristna pravosodna kultura EU,
with a view to creating a genuine EU judicial culture,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 o vlogi Eurojusta in Evropske pravosodne mreže v okviru boja proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu v Evropski uniji ( KOM(2007)0644 ), prečiščene različice Sklepa Sveta 2002/187/PNZ o ustanovitvi Eurojusta za okrepitev boja proti težjim oblikam kriminala (5347/2009), Sklepa Sveta 2008/976/PNZ z dne 16. decembra 2008 o Evropski pravosodni mreži UL L 348, 24.12.2008, str.
having regard to the Commission Communication of 23 October 2007 on the role of Eurojust and the European Judicial Network in the fight against organised crime and terrorism in the European Union ( COM(2007)0644 ), to the consolidated version of Council Decision 2002/187/JHA on setting up Eurojust with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime (5347/2009), to Council Decision 2008/976/JHA of 16 December 2008 on the European Judicial Network OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p.
ter stališč Parlamenta z dne 2 septembra 2008 v zvezi s tem Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0384 in P6_TA(2008)0380 .
as well as to Parliament's positions of 2 September 2008 thereon Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0384 and P6_TA(2008)0380 .
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/978/PNZ z dne 18. decembra 2008 o evropskem dokaznem nalogu za namene pridobitve predmetov, dokumentov in podatkov za uporabo v kazenskih postopkih UL L 350, 30.12.2008, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2008/978/JHA of 18 December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, p.
ter stališča Parlamenta z dne 21. oktobra 2008 v zvezi s tem Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0486 .
and to Parliament's position of 21 October 2008 thereon Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0486 .
ob upoštevanju predloga Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb o nadzornih ukrepih med državami članicami Evropske unije kot alternativi začasnemu priporu (17506/2008),
having regard to the proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the application, between Member States of the European Union, of the principle of mutual recognition to decisions on supervision measures as an alternative to provisional detention (17506/2008),
ob upoštevanju ocenjevalnih poročil o izvajanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ o evropskem nalogu za prijetje in postopkih predaje med državami članicami KOM(2006)0008 ter dokumenti Sveta 8409/2008, 10330/1/2008, 7024/1/2008, 7301/2/2008, 9617/2/2008, 9927/2/2008, 13416/2/2008, 15691/2/2008, 17220/1/2008.
having regard to the evaluation reports on the application of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States COM(2006)0008 and Council documents 8409/2008, 10330/1/2008, 7024/1/2008, 7301/2/2008, 9617/2/2008, 9927/2/2008, 13416/2/2008, 15691/2/2008 and 17220/1/2008.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. novembra 2008 z naslovom "Izkupiček organiziranega hudodelstva - zagotavljanje da se zločin 'ne izplača'" ( KOM(2008)0766 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 November 2008 entitled "Proceeds of organised crime - ensuring that "crime does not pay'" ( COM(2008)0766 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 30. maja 2008 z naslovom "Za evropsko strategijo na področju e-pravosodja" ( KOM(2008)0329 ), sklepov Sveta o strategiji na področju e-pravosodja, resolucije Parlamenta z dne 18. decembra 2008 s priporočili Komisiji o e-pravosodju Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0637 .
having regard to the Commission Communication of 30 May 2008 entitled 'Towards a European e-Justice Strategy' ( COM(2008)0329 ), to the Council Conclusions on a strategy on e-Justice, to Parliament's resolution of 18 December 2008 with recommendations to the Commission on e-Justice Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0637 .
, stališča Parlamenta z dne 9. oktobra 2008 o predlogu sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi Evropskega informacijskega sistema kazenskih evidenc (ECRIS) na podlagi člena 11 Okvirnega sklepa 2008/XX/PNZ Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0465 .
, as well as to Parliament's position of 9 October 2008 on the proposal for a Council decision on the establishment of the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) in application of Article 11 of Framework Decision 2008/XX/JHA Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0465 .
ter sklepov Sveta o poročilu o napredku, doseženem med francoskim predsedovanjem na področju e-pravosodja, ki jih je sprejel Svet za pravosodje in notranje zadeve dne 27. in 28. novembra 2008,
and the Council Conclusions on a report on the progress made during the French Presidency in the area of e-Justice adopted at the JHA Council of 27-28 November 2008,
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih priporočil Priporočilo z dne 14. oktobra 2004 Svetu in Evropskemu svetu o prihodnosti območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter ukrepih za krepitev njegove legitimnosti in učinkovitosti (UL C 166 E, 7.7.2005, str.
having regard to its previous recommendations Recommendation of 14 October 2004 to the Council and to the European Council on the future of the area of freedom, security and justice as well as on the measures required to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness thereof (OJ C 166 E, 7.7.2005, p.
58) ter priporočilo z dne 22. februarja 2005 Svetu o kakovosti kazenskega pravosodja in usklajenosti kazenske zakonodaje v državah članicah (UL C 304 E, 1.12.2005, str.
58), and recommendation of 22 February 2005 to the Council on the quality of criminal justice and the harmonisation of criminal law in the Member States (OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe in zlasti členov 82 do 86 poglavja 4 (pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon and notably to Chapter 4, Articles 82 to 86 (judicial cooperation in criminal matters) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju potrebe po prepoznavanju najboljših načinov za razvoj kazenskopravnega območja EU,
having regard to the need to identify the best way of developing an EU criminal justice area,
ob upoštevanju priprave osnutka prihodnjega stockholmskega programa,
having regard to the drafting of the future Stockholm programme,
ob upoštevanju potrebe po povečanju dialoga o teh zadevah z nacionalnimi parlamenti, civilno družbo in sodnimi organi,
having regard to the need to step up the dialogue on these matters with national parliaments, civil society and judicial authorities,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0262/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0262/2009 ),
ker je delovanje sodstva v nacionalni pristojnosti držav članic,
whereas the administration of justice falls within the national competences of the Member States,
ker bi bilo treba ob upoštevanju Lizbonske pogodbe poudariti, da bi ta, ko bi začela veljati, razširila pristojnosti EU na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ter bi za to področje – z ukinitvijo sistema stebrov – uvedla zakonodajni postopek s soodločanjem,
whereas, with a view to the Treaty of Lisbon, it should be stressed that, once in force, it would widen EU competences in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and would introduce the co-decision law-making process in this area by abolishing the pillar system,
ker haaški program podobno kot program iz Tampereja določa vzpostavitev evropskega območja pravice kot prednostno nalogo in poudarja, da bi moralo priti do krepitve pravosodja prek ustvarjanja zaupanja in vzajemnega zaupanja, izvajanja programa vzajemnega priznavanja, razvoja enakovrednih standardov procesnih pravic v kazenskem postopku, približevanja zakonov – da se storilcem kaznivih dejanj prepreči izkoriščanje razlik v pravosodnih sistemih in državljanom zagotovi zaščita, ne glede na to, kje v EU so – ter zaradi pospeševanja razvoja Eurojusta,
whereas the Hague Programme, like the Tampere Programme, set the creation of a European Area for Justice as a priority and stressed that the strengthening of justice should pass through confidence-building and mutual trust, the implementation of mutual recognition programmes, the development of equivalent standards for procedural rights in criminal proceedings, the approximation of laws - in order to prevent criminals from benefiting from differences in judicial systems and in order to ensure that citizens are protected regardless of where they are in the EU - and with a view to furthering the development of Eurojust,
ker so bili po navedbah poročila Komisije z dne 2. julija 2008 o izvajanju haaškega programa za leto 2007 ( KOM(2008)0373 ) dosežki pri sodelovanju pravosodja v kazenskih zadevah razmeroma majhni, z oviranjem politike in zamudami, ki se odražajo v zmanjšanju števila sprejetih instrumentov, medtem ko je bil zabeležen zadovoljiv razvoj na drugih področjih, kot so sodelovanje v civilnih zadevah, upravljanje meja, zakonite in nezakonite migracije ter politike azila,
whereas, according to the Commission Report of 2 July 2008 on Implementation of the Hague Programme for 2007 ( COM(2008)0373 ), the level of achievement in judicial cooperation in criminal matters has been rather low, with policy blockage and delays which are reflected in the diminishing number of instruments adopted, while satisfactory developments have been registered in other fields, such as cooperation in civil matters, border management, legal and illegal migration, and asylum policies,
ker imajo kazenski postopki pomembne in številne posledice kar zadeva temeljne pravice tako žrtev kaznivih dejanj kot osumljencev in obtožencev,
whereas criminal proceedings have relevant and numerous implications in term of the fundamental freedoms of both victims of crime and suspects and defendants,
ker so varovanje pravic, na primer do pravičnega sojenja, domneva nedolžnosti, pravica do obrambe, pravice žrtev kaznivega dejanja, načelo
whereas the protection of rights such as the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence, the rights of the defence, the rights of victims of crime, the
in minimalni postopkovni zaščitni ukrepi med preiskovalnim priporom pred sojenjem bistveni v kazenskih postopkih,
principle and minimum procedural safeguards in pre-trial detention are primarily essential in criminal proceedings,
ker vsakodnevno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah še vedno temelji na instrumentih medsebojne pomoči, kot sta Konvencija o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 2000 in Konvencija Sveta Evrope o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959,
whereas day-to-day judicial cooperation in criminal matters is still based on mutual assistance instruments such as the 2000 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters and the 1959 Council of Europe Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters,
ker načelo vzajemnega priznavanja v okviru ciljev in načel evropskega prava pomeni, da kadar pristojni sodni organ v eni državi članici izda odločbo, postane ta odločba v celoti in neposredno veljavna na celotnem ozemlju Unije, sodni organi v državah članicah, na ozemlju katerih bi se odločba lahko izvršila, pa pomagajo pri njenem izvrševanju, kot da bi bila to odločba, ki jo je izdal pristojni sodni organ te države članice, razen če instrument, v okviru katerega se izvaja, predvideva omejitve za njeno izvrševanje,
whereas, within the boundaries of the aims and principles of European law, the mutual recognition principle implies that when a decision has been handed down by a competent judicial authority in one Member State, the decision becomes fully and directly effective throughout the territory of the Union, and the judicial authorities in the Member States in the territory of which the decision may be enforced assist in the enforcement of the decision as if it were a decision handed down by a competent authority in that Member State, unless the instrument under which it is implemented places limits on its execution,
ker uresničevanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja, ki je eden od temeljev pravosodnega sodelovanja od Evropskega sveta v Tampereju, nikakor ni zadovoljivo, in ga je treba pospremiti z enotnim nizom postopkovnih jamstev in zaščitnih ukrepov,
whereas the implementation of the mutual recognition principle, which has been the cornerstone of judicial cooperation since the Tampere European Council, is far from having been satisfactorily achieved, and needs to be accompanied by a uniform set of procedural guarantees and safeguards,
ker se je pri načelu vzajemnega priznavanja, kjer se izvaja, pokazalo, podobno kot v primeru evropskega naloga za prijetje, da ima veliko dodano vrednost za pravosodno sodelovanje v Evropski uniji,
whereas where it is implemented, as is the case with the European Arrest Warrant, the mutual recognition principle has proved to have a great added value for judicial cooperation in the European Union,
ker je načelo vzajemnega priznavanja, da bi bilo popolnoma učinkovito, v veliki meri odvisno od oblikovanja skupne evropske pravosodne kulture, ki temelji na medsebojnem zaupanju, skupnih načelih, sodelovanju in določeni ravni usklajevanja – na primer pri opredelitvi nekaterih kaznivih dejanj in sankcij – in od dejanskega varstva temeljnih pravic, zlasti kar zadeva procesne pravice, minimalne standarde pogojev in ponovnega pregleda pridržanja, pravice zapornikov ter dostopne mehanizme odškodnine za posameznike,
whereas, to be fully effective, the mutual recognition principle largely depends on the creation of a common European judicial culture based on mutual trust, common principles, cooperation and a certain level of harmonisation - for instance, in the definition of certain crimes and in the sanctions - and by a genuine protection of fundamental rights, notably with regard to procedural rights, minimum standards for conditions and review of detention, prisoners' rights and accessible mechanisms of redress for individuals,
ker je bil na področju pravosodnega usposabljanja dosežen napredek v več pogledih, zlasti zaradi prispevka Evropske mreže za izobraževanje v pravosodju in njenih dejavnosti,
whereas many steps forward have been taken in the area of judicial training, in particular thanks to the contribution offered by the European Judicial Training Network (EJTN) and its activities,
ker je bila vloga Evropske mreže za izobraževanje v pravosodju kljub pomembnim dosedanjim dosežkom omejena zaradi ovir, povezanih z njeno organizacijsko strukturo, ter zaradi pomanjkanja zadostnih sredstev,
whereas, despite the important results achieved so far, the role of the EJTN has been limited by constraints related to its organisational structure and by the lack of sufficient resources,
ker pravosodni organi zaradi omenjenih razmer sedaj nimajo orodij za usposabljanje, ki bi jih potrebovali za pravilno uporabo zakonodaje EU, in ker ima le majhen del sodstva dostop do sodnega usposabljanja, osredotočenega na EU,
whereas - given the above-mentioned situation - judicial authorities are not currently given the training tools they need to properly apply EU legislation, and only a very small part of the judiciary has access to EU-focused judicial training,
ker prihodnji ukrepi, usmerjeni v razvoj kazenskega pravosodja EU, lahko temeljijo le na objektivnem, nepristranskem, preglednem, natančnem in stalnem spremljanju izvajanja politik in pravnih instrumentov EU, kot tudi na kakovosti in učinkovitosti sodstva v državah članicah,
whereas future action towards the development of the EU criminal justice area cannot but be based on an objective, impartial, transparent, accurate and continuous monitoring of the implementation of EU policies and legal instruments as well as of the quality and efficiency of justice in the Member States,