natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker sta čebelarstvo in biotska raznovrstnost odvisna drug od drugega; ker čebelje kolonije z opraševanjem prispevajo pomembne okoljske, gospodarske in družbene javne dobrine ter tako zagotavljajo varnost preskrbe s hrano in ohranjajo biotsko raznovrstnost in ker čebelarji z vzrejo čebeljih družin opravljajo okoljsko storitev izrednega pomena ter ohranjajo trajnostni model proizvodnje na podeželskih območjih; ker dajejo čebelje paše, raznolika pasišča in nekatere kmetijske kulture (oljna repica, sončnice...) čebelam bogato hrano, potrebno za zdravje in ohranjanje imunske zaščite;
B. whereas beekeeping and biodiversity are mutually dependent; whereas, via pollination, bee colonies provide important environmental, economic and social public goods, thus ensuring food security and maintaining biodiversity, and whereas, by managing their bee colonies, beekeepers perform an environmental service of paramount importance, as well as safeguarding a sustainable production model in rural areas; whereas ‘bee pastures’, diverse foraging grounds and certain crops (rape, sunflowers, etc.) provide bees with the rich nutrition necessary in order to maintain their immune defences and stay healthy,
C. ker so bili izraženi pomisleki, da zaradi visokih stroškov ustanovitve čebelarskega podjetja manj ljudi vstopa v to panogo, zato je premalo panjev za opraševanje pomembnih kmetijskih poljščin;
C. whereas concerns have been raised that owing to the high cost of establishing a beekeeping enterprise, there are fewer people entering the sector, resulting in a shortfall in the hives needed to pollinate vital agricultural crops,
D. ker o zmanjševanju števila čebeljih družin poročajo tako iz EU kot tudi iz drugih delov sveta; ker upada število vrst opraševalcev, ki prispevajo h kmetijski produktivnosti; ker bi se morali kmetje v EU, pa tudi kmetje v drugih delih sveta, v primeru občutnega poslabšanja tega trenda zateči k umetnemu opraševanju, zaradi česar bi se stroški opraševanja povečali za dvakrat; ker znanost in veterinarska praksa trenutno komajda zagotavljata učinkovito preprečevanje ali nadzor bolezni, kar zadeva določene škodljivce in bolezni, zaradi premalo obsežnih raziskav in nezadostnega razvoja novih zdravil za zdravje čebel v zadnjih desetletjih, kar je posledica omejenega obsega trga in posledično majhnega interesa velikih farmacevtskih podjetij; ker omejeno število razpoložljivih zdravil za boj proti pršici Varroa destructor v številnih primerih ni več učinkovito,
D. whereas a decrease in the number of bee colonies has been reported in both the EU and other parts of the world; whereas pollinator species, which contribute to agricultural productivity, are in decline; whereas, in the event of a marked intensification of this trend, farmers in the EU, as well as those in other parts of the world, may have to resort to human‑assisted pollination, which would entail a twofold increase in expenditure on pollination; whereas science and veterinary practice currently provide little in the way of effective prevention or disease control against certain pests and diseases, owing to insufficient research and development of new bee-health medicines in the past decades, which is the result of the limited size of the market and the consequent low interest of big pharmaceutical companies; whereas the limited number of medicines available to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer effective,
E. ker na zdravje posameznih čebel in kolonij vplivajo številni letalni in subletalni dejavniki, mnogi izmed njih pa so povezani med seboj; ker omejeno število zdravil v prometu za boj proti pršici Varroa destructor v številnih primerih ni več dovolj učinkovito zaradi odpornosti nanje; ker strupene uporaba pesticidov, spreminjajoči se podnebni in okoljski pogoji, izguba biotske raznovrstnosti rastlin, sprememba namembnosti zemljišč, slabe čebelarske prakse in prisotnost invazivnih vrst šibijo imunske sisteme kolonij in spodbujajo oportunistične bolezni, ker so medonosne čebele lahko izpostavljene fitofarmacevtskim sredstvom po neposrednih ali posrednih poteh, kot so tok vetra, površinska voda, gutacija, nektar in cvetni prah;
E. whereas the health of individual bees and colonies is affected by numerous lethal and sub-lethal factors, many of them interconnected; whereas the limited number of marketed medicines to fight the Varroa destructor mite are in many cases no longer sufficiently efficient, owing to the emergence of resistance; whereas the use of pesticides, changing climatic and environmental conditions, loss of plant biodiversity, land use change, mismanaged beekeeping practices and the presence of invasive species may weaken colonies’ immune systems and favour opportunistic pathologies; whereas honeybees can be exposed to plant protection products via direct and indirect pathways such as wind drifting, surface water, droplet guttation, nectar and pollen,
F. ker lahko čebelarji prispevajo k ohranjanju zdravja in dobrobiti svojih čebel, čeprav ima pri njihovem uspehu pomembno vlogo kakovost okolja;
F. whereas beekeepers can contribute to, and help maintain, the health and well-being of their bees, although the quality of their environment plays a large role in determining how successful they are.
G. ker se zagovarja minimalna uporaba veterinarskih izdelkov in zdravilnih učinkovin pri ohranjanju zdravega imunskega sistema družine, vendar se pojavljajo težave z odpornostjo; ker čebele učinkovin in zdravil ne presnavljajo, temveč te končajo v medu, in ker so evropski proizvajalci odvisni od čistega, visokokakovostnega medu brez ostankov;
G. whereas minimal use of veterinary products and active substances is advocated, as is maintaining a healthy colony immune system, but whereas resistance problems exist; whereas active substances and medicines are not metabolised by bees, and European producers rely on clean, residue-free, high-quality honey,
H. ker je veliko evropskih čebelarjev amaterjev in ne poklicnih čebelarjev;
H. whereas a large number of European beekeepers are amateur and not professional apiarists,
Raziskave in širjenje znanstvenih spoznanj
Research and dissemination of scientific knowledge
2. meni, da je treba čim prej ukrepati, da bi zaščitili zdravje čebel, pri čemer je treba upoštevati posebnosti čebelarstva, raznolikost udeleženih akterjev ter načeli sorazmernosti in subsidiarnosti;
Considers it important to take urgent measures to protect bee health, taking into account the specificities of beekeeping, the diversity of actors involved and the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity;
6. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi triletne programe na osnovi izjavi vseh držav članic o številu dejansko popisanih čebeljih panjev in ne na osnovi ocen o tem številu;
Calls on the Commission to draw up three-year programmes based on a declaration by all Member States of the number of hives actually registered rather than on estimated figures;
9. poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj s predstavniki čebelarskega sektorja ustanovi usmerjevalni odbor, ki bo pomagal Komisiji pri pripravi letnega delovnega programa referenčnega laboratorija EU; obžaluje, ker je bil prvi letni delovni program referenčnega laboratorija EU predstavljen brez predhodnega posvetovanja z zainteresiranimi stranmi;
Calls on the Commission to set up a steering committee, together with representatives of the beekeeping sector, which will assist the Commission in establishing the annual work programme of the EU reference laboratory; deplores the fact that the first annual work programme of the EU’s reference laboratory was presented without prior consultation of stakeholders;
11. poziva Komisijo, naj izključi prekrivanje pri uporabi sredstev, da bi učinkoviteje zagotavljala gospodarsko in okoljsko dodano vrednost za čebelarje in kmete; poziva Komisijo, naj spodbudi države članice k povečanju sredstev za raziskave;
Calls on the Commission to rule out overlaps in the use of funds in order to increase their effectiveness in guaranteeing economic and ecological added value for both bee-keepers and farmers; calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to raise their level of funding for research;
14. pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za boljše usposabljanje za varnejšo hrano, vendar poziva k njenemu izvajanju tudi po letu 2011 in k povečanju števila udeležencev iz nacionalnih organov;
Welcomes the Commission’s ‘Better Training for Safer Food’ initiative, but calls for the exercise to be extended beyond 2011 and the number of participants from national authorities to be increased;
17. poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti ustrezno usposabljanje za veterinarje ter čebelarjem omogočiti veterinarsko svetovanje in vključiti čebelarske strokovnjake v nacionalne veterinarske organe;
Stresses the need to ensure adequate training for veterinarians, as well as the possibility for beekeepers to consult veterinarians and the involvement of apiculture specialists in national veterinary authorities;
18. priznava velik pomen razvoja novih in učinkovitih sredstev proti pršicam varojam, ki povzročijo približno 10-odstotne letne izgube; meni, da je treba za zmanjšanje negativnih učinkov bolezni in škodljivcev povečati podporo odobrenemu veterinarskemu zdravljenju; poziva Komisijo, naj uvede skupne smernice za veterinarsko zdravljenje na tem področju in poudari pomen njegove pravilne uporabe; zahteva, naj se uvedejo smernice o uporabi molekul in/ali formul, ki temeljijo na organskih kislinah in eteričnih oljih ter drugih učinkovinah, odobrenih za biološko zatiranje škodljivcev;
Recognises that the development of innovative and effective treatments against Varroa mites, which are implicated in some 10 % of annual losses, is of high importance; considers that there is a need to increase support for authorised veterinary treatments in order to reduce the negative effects of diseases and pests; asks the Commission to introduce common guidelines regarding veterinary treatment in the sector, stressing the need for it to be properly used; calls for guidelines to be introduced for the use of molecules and/or formulations with a base of organic acids and essential oils and other substances authorised for biological pest control;
22. podpira namero Komisije za uvedbo največje mejne vrednosti ostanka pri uporabi zdravil na podlagi „kaskadnega“ postopka, da bi odpravila sedanjo pravno negotovost, ki ovira zdravljenje bolnih čebel;
Welcomes the Commission’s intention to introduce maximum residue levels for the use of medicinal products through the ‘cascade’ procedure in order to eliminate the current legal uncertainty, which hinders the treatment of sick bees;
26. podpira programe razmnoževanja s poudarkom na odpornosti proti boleznim in zajedavcem, zlasti proti varozi;
Supports breeding programmes which concentrate on disease and pest tolerance, especially with reference to varroasis;
Vplivi sodobnega kmetijstva na čebele
Effects of modern agriculture on bees
28. vabi Komisijo, naj izboljša metodologijo ocene tveganja za pesticide, da bi zaščitila zdravje čebeljih družin in razvoj populacije, ter naj zagotovi primeren dostop do ugotovitev in metodologije ekotoksikoloških študij, vključenih v dokumentacijo za odobritev;
Invites the Commission to improve risk assessment methodology for pesticides in order to protect colony health and population development and to ensure appropriate access to the findings and methodology of ecotoxicological studies included in the authorisation dossiers;
Vidiki proizvodnje in varnosti hrane, zaščita porekla
Production and food safety aspects, protection of origin
36. poziva, naj se glede na različne metode pri analizah v različnih državah članicah določi začasna meja (referenčna točka za ukrepanje) 10 ppb za količino veterinarskih proizvodov, dovoljenih v Evropski uniji;
Calls for a provisional threshold limit (Reference Point for Action) of 10 ppb to be set for veterinary products authorised in the European Union, in view of the different analytical methods that are applied in the various Member States;
39. poziva Komisijo, naj uskladi predpise o označevanju z določbami Uredbe o shemah kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov in uvede obvezno označevanje države izvora za uvožene in v EU proizvedene čebelarske proizvode, v primerih mešanic proizvodov različnega izvora pa obvezno označevanje vseh držav izvora;
Calls on the Commission to harmonise rules on labelling with the provisions of the Regulation on Agricultural Quality Schemes and to introduce obligatory labelling with the country of origin for imported and EU-produced apicultural products or, in the case of mixtures of products with different origins, obligatory labelling with every country of origin;
41. poziva k ukrepom za pospešitev porabe evropskega medu in čebelarskih proizvodov, vključno s promocijo medu, katerega značilnosti so specifične za posamezno vrsto in geografsko območje;
Calls for action to boost consumption of European honey and apiculture products, including by promoting honeys with characteristics specific to certain varieties and geographical areas;
Ukrepi, povezani z ohranjanjem biotske raznovrstnosti in s prihajajočo reformo skupne kmetijske politike
Measures in connection with the conservation of biodiversity and the forthcoming reform of the Common Agricultural Policy
44. poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnji reformi SKP pojasni ukrepe podpore in pomoči za evropski čebelarski sektor ob upoštevanju okoljskih in družbenih javnih dobrin, ki jih zagotavljajo čebelje družine z opraševanjem, ter okoljske storitve, ki jih zagotavljajo čebelarji z vzrejo čebeljih družin;
Calls on the Commission to clarify, in the forthcoming reform of the CAP, the support measures and aid to be assigned to the European beekeeping sector, taking account of the environmental and social public goods that honeybee colonies provide via pollination and of the environmental service performed by beekeepers in managing their bee colonies;
46. poziva Komisijo, naj preuči možnost vzpostavitve posebne sheme za pomoč čebelarjem v okviru sheme neposredne pomoči, na primer prek plačil za čebelje družine, ki bi pomagala ohraniti čebelarski sektor v EU, zadržala čebelarje v čebelarstvu, k čebelarjenju spodbudila mlade ter zagotovila, da bodo čebele še naprej opravljale vlogo opraševalk;
Calls on the Commission to consider the possibility of creating a special scheme for assistance to beekeepers within the framework of the direct aid scheme, for example through bee colony payments, which will help safeguard the beekeeping sector in the EU, keep beekeepers in beekeeping, encourage young people to become beekeepers and ensure bees continue to act as pollinators;
49. poziva vse zainteresirane strani v čebelarskem sektorju, naj izkoristijo priložnosti, ki jih ponujata sedanja skupna kmetijska politika in njena prihajajoča reforma, ki ustrezno upoštevata organizacije proizvajalcev v kmetijskem sektorju;
Calls on all stakeholders in the beekeeping sector to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the current common agricultural policy and the upcoming reform thereof, which take proper account of producer organisations throughout the agricultural sector;
51. odločno poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru Direktive Sveta 92/65/EGS z dne 13. julija 1992 vsaj začasno prepove uvoz živih čebel in vrst roda Bombus iz tretjih držav, da bi preprečili vnos eksotičnih bolezni, zlasti ker v Evropski uniji ni pomanjkanja genskih virov za čebelarstvo ob upoštevanju glavnih podvrst, iz katerih izhajajo pasme in različice, ki se danes uporabljajo v čebelarstvu;
Urges the Commission, within the framework of Council Directive 92/65/EEC of 13 July 1992, to ban, at least temporarily, the import from third countries of live bees and species of the genus Bombus sp. in order to prevent the introduction of exotic diseases, particularly given that there is no shortage of genetic resources for apiculture in the European Union, bearing in mind the main subspecies from which the breeds and varieties currently used in apiculture originated;
Čebelarski sektor je sestavni del evropskega kmetijstva.
The beekeeping sector is an integral part of European agriculture.
Je vir primarnega ali dodatnega dohodka za več kot 600.000 državljanov Evropske unije.
It provides primary or additional income for more than 600.000 citizens of the European Union.
Prek opraševanja opravlja življenjsko pomembne naloge v kmetijstvu in prispeva k ohranjanju biotske raznovrstnosti.
It offers vital services for agriculture through pollination and contributes to the maintenance of biodiversity.
Po ocenah je 84 % rastlinskih vrst in 76 % proizvodnje hrane v Evropi odvisnih od opraševanja čebel, ekonomska vrednost tega pa je veliko višja od vrednosti proizvedenega medu in je v EU ocenjena na 15 milijard EUR letno.
It is estimated that 84% of the plant species and 76% of food production in Europe are dependent on pollination by bees, the economic value of which is much greater than the value of the honey produced and is estimated at € 15 billion per year in the EU.
Z opraševanjem, ki z ohranjanjem genske raznolikosti rastlin prispeva k izboljšanju biotske raznovrstnosti in ohranitvi ekološkega ravnovesja, zagotavlja čebelarstvo tudi pomembno ekosistemsko storitev.
Apiculture also provides an important ecosystem service via pollination, which contributes to the improvement of biodiversity by maintaining the genetic diversity of plants and the maintenance of the ecological balance.
Poleg tega je čebelarstvo del evropske kmetijske dediščine in nacionalnih tradicij.
In addition, beekeeping is part of the European agricultural heritage and of national traditions.
Čebelarstvo je edinstveno v primerjavi z drugimi sektorji živinoreje.
Beekeeping is unique compared to other animal husbandry sectors.
Goji žuželke, poldivje živali, ki jih ni moč udomačiti ali neposredno nadzirati kot druge vrste.
It breeds insects, semi-wild animals which cannot be domesticated or directly controlled like other species.
Čebelarstvo ne temelji na posamezni živali, ampak na vsej dejavni koloniji iz več tisoč žuželk, ki sodelujejo kot celice v drugih organizmih.
Beekeeping is based not on the individual animal, but on the entire functional colony, which consists of several thousand insects working together like cells in other organisms.
Zato morajo znanstvene raziskave in regulacija zadevati tako posamezno žival kot tudi vso kolonijo.
Therefore scientific research and regulation must be directed at both the individual animal and the entire colony levels.
Obstajajo pomembne razlike med značilnostmi čebelarstva v posameznih državah članicah, kot na primer v številu in izobrazbi čebelarjev (ljubiteljski v primerjavi s poklicnimi čebelarji), gostoti postavitve panjev ali metodi čebelarjenja (stacionarni ali mobilni čebelnjaki, sezonska paša).
There are significant differences between member states’ apicultural features, such as the number and the qualification of beekeepers (amateur versus professional), hive-density or the beekeeping operation method (stationary or mobile apiaries, transhumance).
Več držav članic ima še posebej ugodne okoljske in kmetijske pogoje za čebelarstvo, med njimi so Francija, Grčija, Italija, Madžarska, Poljska, Portugalska, Romunija in Španija.
Several member states have especially favourable environmental and agricultural conditions for apiculture, such as France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania and Spain.
Zaradi večje gostote postavitve panjev in števila poklicnih čebelarjev se te države pogosto pojmuje kot „poklicnočebelarske države članice“.
Due to higher hive density and number of professional beekeeper these countries are often referred to as the ‘professional beekeeper member states’.
Zmanjšanje vrzeli v znanju poklicnih in ljubiteljskih čebelarjev ter izboljšanje izmenjave informacij in znanstvenih spoznanj med njimi z učinkovitim usposabljanjem sta zelo pomembna.
Decreasing the knowledge gap between professional and amateur beekeepers and improving the spread of information and scientific knowledge among them with effective training is of great importance.
Natančni vzroki za nedavno povečanje pogina čebel so še vedno nejasni.
The exact reasons of the recent increases in bee mortality are still unclear.
Razvoj novih izdelkov za zdravje čebel ovira več preprek.
There are several obstacles stalling the development of novel bee-health product.
Trg s takšnimi izdelki je sorazmerno majhen v primerjavi z drugimi sektorji živinoreje, donosnost naložb pa je nizka.
The market of such products is relatively small compared to the other livestock sectors, and the return on investments is low.
Zato proizvajalcev zdravil za uporabo v veterinarski medicini ne zanima razvoj novih zdravil za zdravje čebel.
Therefore producers of veterinary products are not interested in the development of new bee-health medicines.
Sedanja uredba o sistemu mejnih vrednosti ostankov celo ne zagotavlja ustrezne zaščite pravic intelektualne lastnine in tako odvrača inovativne proizvajalce od razvoja.
Moreover, the current regulation of the MRL system does not ensure the proper protection of intellectual property rights, discouraging innovative producers from the development.
Komisija mora obravnavati ta problem v uravnoteženi novi uredbi.
The Commission should deal with this problem in a balanced new regulation.
Poleg razvijanja novih zdravil je treba dodatno preučiti preventivne ukrepe, programe gojenja čebel in gensko ohranitev, ki se osredotoča na odpornost na bolezni in škodljivce, pa je treba podpreti na nacionalni ravni.
Besides developing new medicines prevention measures should be further examined, bee-breeding programmes and gene conservation concentrating on disease and pest tolerance should be supported on national level.
Ena glavnih ovir za učinkovito ukrepanje proti prevelikim poginom čebel je pomanjkanje zanesljivih in primerljivih podatkov o številu panjev, čebelarjev in izgubi kolonij v EU.
One of the main barriers of effective action against excessive bee mortality is the lack of reliable and comparable data on the number of hives, beekeepers and colony losses in the EU.
Zato je resnično treba uporabiti učinkovit usklajen nadzorni sistem, da se oceni obseg poginov čebel, in natančneje proučiti obseg izgub kolonij ter vzroke zanje in za druge zdravstvene težave čebel.
There is strong need to apply effective harmonised surveillance system to estimate the extent of bee mortalities and to develop more accurate knowledge on the extent and the causes of colony losses and other bee health problems.
Na evropski ravni je potreben usklajen nadzorni sistem, vendar morajo ukrepati tudi države članice, da bi ublažile tveganja, ki vplivajo na zdravje čebel.
While a harmonised surveillance system is necessary on European level, member states also have to act in mitigating the risks affecting bee health.
Treba je uskladiti raziskave in izmenjati znanstvene rezultate na evropski ravni, da bi se izognili prekrivanju.
Research has to be harmonised and the scientific results have to be shared on European level in order to avoid overlaps.
Nacionalne oblasti in reprezentativne organizacije v državah članicah morajo podpirati širjenje ustreznih znanstvenih in tehničnih spoznanj o zdravju čebel med čebelarji.
National authorities and representative organisations in the member states have to support the spreading of appropriate scientific and technical knowledge about bee health among beekeepers.
Potreben je trajen in strukturiran dialog med čebelarji, kmeti in ustreznimi organi.
A permanent and structured dialogue is needed between beekeepers, farmers and the relevant authorities.
Komisija bi morala prispevati k uspehu dialoga s prevodom svojih ustreznih spletnih strani v vse uradne jezike tistih držav članic, v katerih ima čebelarstvo pomembno gospodarsko vlogo.
The Commission should contribute to the success of this dialogue by making available its relevant webpage on all official languages of those Member States’ where beekeeping plays an important economic role.