natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 4. septembra 2007 o boljši pravni ureditvi v Evropski uniji ( 2007/2095(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 4 September 2007 on Better Regulation in the European Union ( 2007/2095(INI) )
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. oktobra 2000 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1998 – skupna odgovornost (1998)" in "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 1999" UL C 197, 12.7.2001, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 October 2000 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 1998 – A shared responsibility (1998)" and "Better lawmaking 1999" OJ C 197, 12.7.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. novembra 2001 o Beli knjigi Komisije o evropskem javnem upravljanju UL C 153 E, 27.6.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 November 2001 on the Commission White Paper on European governance OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. aprila 2003 o poročilih Komisije Evropskemu svetu z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2000" in "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2001" UL C 64 E, 12.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 8 April 2003 on the Commission reports to the European Council entitled "Better lawmaking 2000" and "Better lawmaking 2001" OJ C 64 E, 12.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. februarja 2004 o poročilu Komisije z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2002" UL C 98 E, 23.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 February 2004 on the Commission report entitled "Better Lawmaking 2002" OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. marca 2004 o sporočilu Komisije o poenostavitvi in izboljšanju zakonodajne dejavnosti Skupnosti UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 9 March 2004 on the Commission communication on simplifying and improving the Community's regulatory activity OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o oceni učinka zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopkov posvetovanja UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on assessment of the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedures OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o strategiji poenostavitve zakonodajnega okolja UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on a strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje 2004: Uporaba načela subsidiarnosti - 12. letno poročilo UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on Better lawmaking 2004: application of the principle of subsidiarity – 12th annual report OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. maja 2006 o izidu pregleda zakonodajnih predlogov, ki čakajo na obravnavo zakonodajalca UL C 297 E, 7.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 16 May 2006 on the outcome of the screening of legislative proposals pending before the Legislator OJ C 297 E, 7.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z dne 14. novembra 2006 z naslovom "Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2006)0689 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 14 November 2006 entitled "A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union" ( COM(2006)0689 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0273/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0273/2007 ),
ker je uspeh pri uresničevanju cilja "boljše pravne ureditve" ena glavnih prednostnih nalog Evropske unije, saj bi povečanje koristi sodobne, razumne in učinkovite zakonodaje s čim manjšimi stroški zagotovilo najvišjo raven produktivnosti, rasti, sprejetosti in končno zaposlovanja v Evropi
whereas succeeding in attaining the objective of "Better Regulation" constitutes one of the main priorities for the European Union, as maximising the benefits of modern, rational and effective legislation whilst minimising its costs would ensure the highest level of productivity, growth
ker Komisija v svojem zgoraj navedenem sporočilu z dne 14. novembra 2006 analizira napredek, dosežen na področju boljše pravne ureditve, in navaja prihodnje glavne izzive, pri čemer poudarja napredek, ki je potreben na evropski ravni in na ravni držav članic, ter s tem razvija splošen pristop za enostavnejšo ter zato cenejšo uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti in nacionalne zakonodaje,
whereas the Commission, in its above-mentioned communication of 14 November 2006, analyses progress achieved in the area of better regulation and maps out the main challenges ahead, pointing out the progress to be made both at European level and at the level of the Member States and thus developing an overall approach aimed at making Community and national legislation easier to apply and hence less costly,
ker ta pristop, ki za Komisijo, Svet in Evropski parlament pomeni uporabno orodje za uresničevanje ciljev Lizbonske strategije, zahteva tesno partnerstvo na tem področju, najprej med evropskimi institucijami ter nato med evropskimi institucijami in nacionalnimi organi,
whereas this approach, constituting for the Commission, the Council and the European Parliament a useful tool for achieving the aims of the Lisbon strategy, requires a close partnership in this area, first between the European institutions and then between the latter and the national authorities,
ker v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisija predlaga povečano spremljanje ocen učinka z uvedbo neodvisnega odbora za oceno učinka pod vodstvom predsednika Komisije ter se zavezuje, da bo sprejela bolj preventivne ukrepe in države članice že od vsega začetka spremljala, da se omogoči pravilen prenos ključnih direktiv,
whereas, in the above-mentioned communication, the Commission proposes to reinforce the scrutiny of impact assessments through the creation of an independent Impact Assessment Board under the authority of the Commission's President, and commits itself to taking more preventive action, following up with Member States at an early stage so as to facilitate the correct transposition of key directives,
ker bi morala po mnenju Komisije Evropski parlament in Svet zagotoviti bolj sistematične ocene učinka glavnih predlogov sprememb k njenim predlogom ter dati večjo prednost predlogom za poenostavitev, ki so v obravnavi, kodifikaciji in razveljavitvi zastarele zakonodaje,
whereas, in the Commission's view, the European Parliament and the Council should provide more systematic impact assessments of major amendments to its proposals and give higher priority to pending simplification proposals, to codification and to the repeal of obsolete legislation,
ker Komisija predlaga, da bi morale države članice nato razviti in izvrševati mehanizme posvetovanja in programe poenostavitve, kjer jih ni, ter bi morale spodbujati bolj sistematično oceno gospodarskih, socialnih in okoljskih učinkov, skupaj z izboljšano uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti,
whereas the Commission proposes that Member States should in turn develop and enforce consultation mechanisms and simplification programmes, where these are missing, and should foster a more systematic assessment of economic, social and environmental impacts, along with an improved application of Community law,
ker boljša pravna ureditev ni izključno zmanjševanje birokracije, zmanjševanje upravnega bremena in poenostavljanje veljavne zakonodaje ali deregulacija, ampak tudi zagotavljanje, da v zakonodajnem postopku sodelujejo vsi pomembni vladni in nevladni akterji na vseh ravneh ter da se vzpostavi tesno partnerstvo med evropskimi institucijami ter nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi z namenom, da se zagotovi kakovostna pravna ureditev,
whereas better regulation is not exclusively about cutting red tape, reducing the administrative burden, simplifying existing legislation or deregulation but also involves ensuring that the legislative process is engaged with by all relevant governmental and non-governmental actors at all levels and that a close partnership is established between the European institutions and the national, regional and local authorities in order to deliver high-quality regulation,
ker mora biti vsaka raven upravljanja zavezana k boljši pravni ureditvi, da se zmanjša upravno breme,
whereas every level of governance must be committed to better regulation in order to achieve any reduction in the administrative burden,
ker se lokalni in regionalni organi pogosto srečujejo z nalogo izvajanja in zagotavljanja izvrševanja zakonodaje EU,
whereas local and regional authorities often face the task of implementing and enforcing EU law,
ker Komisija nazadnje predlaga, da Evropska unija in države članice začnejo ambiciozno strategijo za zmanjšanje upravnih obremenitev, ki izhajajo iz evropske in nacionalne zakonodaje, in da mora biti skupni cilj zmanjšanja v zvezi s tem dosežen do leta 2012,
whereas, finally, the Commission proposes that both the European Union and Member States should embark on an ambitious strategy for reducing administrative burdens originating in European and national legislation, and that the joint reduction target in this regard should be achieved by 2012,
odločno podpira postopek boljše pravne ureditve, namenjene izboljšanju uspešnosti, učinkovitosti, skladnosti, odgovornosti in preglednosti zakonodaje EU; vendar poudarja, da mora tak postopek temeljiti na nekaterih predpostavkah, kot so:
Strongly supports the process of Better Regulation with a view to strengthening the effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, accountability and transparency of EU law; stresses, however, that such a process needs to be based on a number of preconditions:
celovita in skupna vključenost Sveta, Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta;
full and joint involvement of the Council, the Commission and the European Parliament;
obširno in jasno posvetovanje z vsemi pomembnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, vključno z nevladnimi organizacijami;
wide and transparent consultation of all relevant stakeholders, including non-governmental organisations;
krepitev odgovornosti organov Skupnosti za zakonodajni proces in splošne preglednosti tega postopka, zlasti z odprtjem sej Sveta za javni pregled, kadar Svet deluje v svoji zakonodajni vlogi;
strengthening of the accountability of Community bodies for the regulatory process, and of the general transparency of that process, in particular by opening Council meetings to public scrutiny when the Council is acting in its legislative capacity;
vsaka ocena, namenjena poenostavitvi, mora enakovredno upoštevati gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in zdravstvene vidike ter ne sme biti omejena na kratkoročno presojo;
any assessment aimed at simplification must consider economic, social, environmental and health aspects on an equal footing and should not be limited to short-term considerations;
postopek poenostavitve ne sme pod nobenim pogojem pomeniti zniževanje meril, ki jih vsebuje veljavna zakonodaja;
the simplification process must under no circumstance entail lowering the standards contained in current legislation;
podpira cilj Komisije, da izboljša kakovost zakonodaje in da zmanjša upravno obremenitev; meni, da ukrepi, opisani v sporočilu Komisije, izkazujejo jasno in trajno zavezo temu cilju, vendar meni, da je na številnih področjih potrebno še večje prizadevanje, da se zagotovi, da bo zakonodaja o notranjem trgu prinesla največje možne gospodarske koristi;
Supports the Commission's aim of improving the quality of legislation and reducing the administrative burden; believes that the measures outlined in the Commission communication demonstrate a clear and ongoing commitment to that aim, but considers that still greater efforts are required in a number of areas to ensure that the maximum economic benefit is derived from internal market legislation;
poziva Komisijo, da si ustrezno prizadeva za poenostavitev in posodobitev obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti z ustrezno strategijo poenostavitve, ki bi morala ustrezno vključevati države članice in zainteresirane strani; kljub temu znova potrjuje, da čeprav mora cilj boljše pravne ureditve zadevati vse evropske institucije, ima Komisija bistveno vlogo pri pripravi visokokakovostnih zakonodajnih predlogov, ki so najboljše izhodišče za celoten postopek poenostavitve;
Urges the Commission to make all necessary efforts to streamline and modernise the stock of existing Community legislation through an adequate simplification strategy which should properly involve the Member States and interested parties; nevertheless, reaffirms that, although the goal of better regulation is to be shared among all European institutions, the Commission plays a crucial role in preparing high-quality legislative proposals, which constitute the best starting-point for the whole simplification process;
poziva Komisijo, da se bolj posveča izvajanju, zagotavljanju izvrševanja in ocenjevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti kot bistvenemu delu postopka za boljšo pravno ureditev;
Urges the Commission to place greater emphasis on the implementation, enforcement and evaluation of Community legislation, as an essential part of the Better Regulation process;
soglaša s Komisijo, da boljše priprave zakonodaje ni mogoče doseči brez celotne slike gospodarskega, socialnega, okoljskega, zdravstvenega in mednarodnega učinka vsakega zakonodajnega predloga; zato v celoti podpira vzpostavitev odbora za oceno učinka v okviru Komisije, ki bo v pristojnosti predsednika Komisije, da se nadzoruje izvrševanje teh načel pri sestavi ocen učinka s strani odgovornega osebja Komisije;
Agrees with the Commission that better lawmaking cannot be achieved without an overall picture of the economic, social, environmental, health and international impact of each legislative proposal; fully supports, therefore, the setting-up within the Commission of an Impact Assessment Board under the authority of the Commission's President in order to monitor the application of these principles in the drafting of impact assessments by the responsible staff of the Commission;
poudarja pa, da bi bilo treba, da se zagotovi minimalno raven neodvisnega pregleda pri sestavi ocen učinka, ustanoviti odbor neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki bi s pomočjo kontrol na kraju samem nadzoroval kakovost mnenj, ki bi jih podal odbor za oceno učinka, ter da bi moralo biti dovoljeno tudi, da predstavniki zainteresiranih strani nudijo pomoč pri njihovem izvajanju;
Stresses, nevertheless, that, in order to guarantee a minimum level of independent scrutiny in the drafting of impact assessments, an independent panel of experts should be set up to monitor, by means of spot checks, the quality of opinions delivered by the Impact Assessment Board, and that representatives of interested parties should also be allowed to assist in conducting them;
meni, da je potrebno, da odbor za oceno učinka jamči za izvrševanje skupne metodologije za vse ocene učinka, da se preprečijo protislovni pristopi in olajša primerljivost;
Considers it necessary that the Impact Assessment Board should guarantee the application of a common methodology for all impact assessments, so as to avoid contradictory approaches and to facilitate comparability;
vztraja, da mora biti Parlament redno obveščen o odločitvah, ki jih sprejme odbor za oceno učinka pod nadzorom predsednika Komisije, da se zagotovi pregleden dialog med tema dvema institucijama;
Insists that Parliament be informed periodically of the decisions adopted by the Impact Assessment Board under the supervision of the President of the Commission, with a view to ensuring transparent dialogue between the two institutions.
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi ocene učinka, ki navajajo zadostno število scenarijev in možnosti politike (vključno z možnostmi "ne stori ničesar", če je potrebno) kot podlago za cenovno učinkovite, trajnostne in družbeno sprejemljive rešitve;
Calls on the Commission to provide impact assessments presenting a sufficient number of scenarios and policy options (including "do-nothing" options as necessary) as a basis for cost-effective, sustainable and socially acceptable solutions;
meni, da je splošno pravilo, da vsaka ocena učinka ustrezno upošteva vse mogoče večje vplive političnega predloga na družbo, okolje in gospodarstvo ter da mora vedno, ko je to mogoče in v skladu z ustreznim zakonodajnim področjem, ocena učinka upoštevati vse mogoče večje vplive na ranljive skupine ali manjšine ter vidike vključevanja enakosti med spoloma in druge občutljive ciljne skupine, na primer etnične manjšine, starše, ki vzgajajo otroke, ostarele in neozdravljivo bolne ter invalidne osebe ("družbena primerjava");
Considers it a general rule that any impact assessment must take into due account all possible significant effects of a policy proposal on society, the environment and the economy, and furthermore that, whenever possible and consistent with the relevant area of legislation, impact assessments must also take into due account all possible significant effects on vulnerable or minority groups as well as gender mainstreaming aspects and other sensitive target groups, for example ethnic minorities, parents bringing up children, the aged and permanently ill and disabled people ("social benchmarking");
zahteva od Komisije, da se pri pripravi ocene učinka posvetuje z vsemi zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti z nacionalnimi, regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi, da se lahko ustrezno upoštevajo lokalne ali regionalne različice, ter da dovolj zgodaj obvesti Parlament, Odbor regij ter vse zadevne regionalne in lokalne vladne organe o rezultatih ocene učinka;
Requests the Commission to consult all relevant stakeholders, and in particular national, regional and local authorities, when preparing an impact assessment so that the local or regional variations can be properly taken into account, and to notify the results of the impact assessment in good time to Parliament, to the Committee of Regions and to all relevant regional and local governmental bodies;
meni, da se je treba v ta namen na vseh stopnjah posvetovati z vsemi zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi, po možnosti z večjim dostopom do spletnega mesta Komisije za potrebe javnih obravnav, sicer so lahko rezultati teh obravnav naključni, ter z novimi in bolj strukturiranimi načini posvetovanja, kot jih predvideva sporočilo Komisije z naslovom "Krepitev kulture posvetovanja in dialoga – splošna načela in minimalni standardi za posvetovanje Komisije z zainteresiranimi stranmi" ( KOM(2002)0704 ); meni, da mora v zvezi s tem Komisija omogočati največjo možno preglednost tako, da objavi odzive zainteresiranih strani;
Considers that, to this end, all relevant stakeholders must be consulted, at all stages, possibly by having greater recourse to the Commission's website for the purposes of public hearings, the outcome of which might otherwise be aleatory, and through new and more structured ways of consultation, as envisaged in the Commission's Communication entitled "Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue - General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission" ( COM(2002)0704 ); takes the view that, in this connection, the Commission must provide maximum transparency by publishing the reactions of interested parties;
poudarja, da bi morala Parlament in Svet priskrbeti bolj sistematične ocene učinka poglavitnih sprememb k predlogom Komisije;
Stresses that Parliament and the Council should provide more systematic impact assessments of major amendments to Commission proposals;
poziva Komisijo, da navede, na kateri stopnji postopka so še neobjavljene ocene učinka, tako da pojasni, ali so te ocene zdaj v postopku ali so bile umaknjene, odložene ali ponovno sprožene na drugačnih temeljih itd., in da se posvetuje z zainteresiranimi stranmi o tistih, ki so še v postopku;
Urges the Commission to specify the stage reached by impact assessments which have not yet been published, making it clear whether those assessments are still pending or have been withdrawn, postponed or restarted on different grounds, etc., and to consult interested parties on those still pending;
vztraja, da države članice zagotovijo oceno učinka za svoje pobude na področju policijskega in pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, v skladu s členom 34(2) Pogodbe EU; meni, da se morajo države članice zavezati k priznavanju resnične obveznosti v zvezi s tem;
Insists that Member States provide an impact assessment for their initiatives in the area of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, pursuant to Article 34(2) of the EU Treaty; considers that Member States should commit themselves to recognising a real obligation in this respect;
podpira redno pregledovanje predlogov, ki ga opravlja Komisija, in umik predlogov v obravnavi; kljub temu vztraja, da je to prakso treba obravnavati v smislu posebnih pravic, ki jih uživajo različne institucije Skupnosti v zakonodajnem postopku, kot so opredeljene v pogodbah, ter v skladu z načelom lojalnega sodelovanja med institucijami;
Supports the Commission's exercise of periodical screening and withdrawal of pending proposals; maintains, however, that this exercise must be viewed in the light of the prerogatives of the various Community institutions in the legislative process, as defined in the Treaties, and in compliance with the principle of loyal cooperation among the institutions;
soglaša s spodbujanjem zakonodaje, utemeljene na načelih, ter osredotočenostjo na kakovost in ne na količino; vidi razpravo o boljši pravni ureditvi kot priložnost za razmislek o zakonodaji kot procesu, ki je namenjen doseganju jasno določenih ciljev politik, tako da obvezuje in vključuje vse zainteresirane strani v vse faze postopka, od priprave do izvajanja;
Is in favour of promoting principles-based legislation and focusing on quality rather than quantity; sees the better regulation debate as an occasion to reflect on legislation as a process designed to achieve clearly defined policy goals by committing all stakeholders to all phases of the process, from preparation to enforcement, and involving them therein;
meni, da je izkušnja z Lamfalussyjevim postopkom na področju reguliranja finančnih trgov, zlasti dialog med regulatorji in udeleženci na trgu, dragocen primer v podporo dinamičnega zakonodajnega postopka;
Regards the experience of the Lamfalussy procedure in financial markets regulation, and the regulator-market participants dialogue in particular, as a valuable case for a dynamic legislative process;