natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Obveznost pristojnih organov pomagati ponudnikom in prejemnikom ne bi smela vključevati tudi pravnega svetovanja v posameznih primerih.
The obligation on competent authorities to assist providers and recipients should not include the provision of legal advice in individual cases.
Kljub temu je treba zagotoviti splošne informacije o tem, kako se zahteve običajno razlagajo ali uporabljajo.
Nevertheless, general information on the way in which requirements are usually interpreted or applied should be given.
Zadeve, kot je prevzemanje odgovornosti za posredovanje napačnih ali zavajajočih informacij, bi morale opredeliti države članice.
Issues such as liability for providing incorrect or misleading information should be determined by Member States.
V bližnji prihodnosti bo nujno treba vzpostaviti elektronske oblike opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti, kar bo omogočilo upravno poenostavitev na področju storitvenih dejavnosti, ki bo koristila ponudnikom, prejemnikom in pristojnim organom.
The setting up, in the reasonably near future, of electronic means of completing procedures and formalities will be vital for administrative simplification in the field of service activities, for the benefit of providers, recipients and competent authorities.
Da bi izpolnili obveznost glede doseganja rezultatov, bo morda treba prilagoditi nacionalne zakone in druge predpise o storitvah, ki se uporabljajo na področju storitev.
In order to meet that obligation as to results, national laws and other rules applicable to services may need to be adapted.
Ta obveznost ne preprečuje državam članicam, da poleg elektronskih zagotovijo še druga sredstva za opravljanje takih postopkov in formalnosti.
This obligation should not prevent Member States from providing other means of completing such procedures and formalities, in addition to electronic means.
Možnost opravljanja postopkov in formalnosti na daljavo pomeni predvsem to, da morajo države članice zagotoviti, da jih bo mogoče opravljati čezmejno.
The fact that it must be possible to complete those procedures and formalities at a distance means, in particular, that Member States must ensure that they may be completed across borders.
Obveznost glede doseganja rezultatov ne zajema postopkov ali formalnosti, ki jih zaradi njihove narave ni mogoče opravljati na daljavo.
The obligation as to results does not cover procedures or formalities which by their very nature are impossible to complete at a distance.
Hkrati ne posega v zakonodajo držav članic o rabi jezikov.
Furthermore, this does not interfere with Member States' legislation on the use of languages.
Pri izdaji dovoljenj za nekatere storitvene dejavnosti lahko pristojni organ zahteva pogovor s prosilcem, namenjen oceni prosilčeve osebne integritete in primernosti za izvajanje zadevne storitve.
The granting of licences for certain service activities may require an interview with the applicant by the competent authority in order to assess the applicant's personal integrity and suitability for carrying out the service in question.
V takšnih primerih za izpolnjevanje formalnosti ni primerna elektronska oblika.
In such cases, the completion of formalities by electronic means may not be appropriate.
Možnost začetka opravljanja storitvene dejavnosti bi morala biti predmet odobritve pristojnih organov le, če so pri tej odločitvi izpolnjena merila glede nediskriminacije, nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
The possibility of gaining access to a service activity should be made subject to authorisation by the competent authorities only if that decision satisfies the criteria of non-discrimination, necessity and proportionality.
To zlasti pomeni, da so sistemi dovoljenj dopustni le, če naknadni nadzor ne bi bil učinkovit, ker pomanjkljivosti zadevnih storitev ne bi bilo mogoče naknadno preveriti, pri čemer se upoštevajo tveganja in nevarnosti, do katerih lahko pride, ker predhodni nadzor ni bil opravljen.
That means, in particular, that authorisation schemes should be permissible only where an a posteriori inspection would not be effective because of the impossibility of ascertaining the defects of the services concerned a posteriori, due account being taken of the risks and dangers which could arise in the absence of a prior inspection.
Vendar se te določbe te direktive ne smejo uporabljati za upravičevanje sistemov dovoljenj, ki jih prepovedujejo drugi instrumenti Skupnosti, kot sta Direktiva 1999/93/ES z dne 13. decembra 1999 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o okviru Skupnosti za elektronski podpis UL L 13, 19.1.2000, str.
However, the provision to that effect made by this Directive cannot be relied upon in order to justify authorisation schemes which are prohibited by other Community instruments such as Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures OJ L 13, 19.1.2000, p.
ali Direktiva 2000/31/ES z dne 8. junija 2000 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju) UL L 178, 17.7.2000, str.
, or Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (Directive on electronic commerce) OJ L 178, 17.7.2000, p.
Na podlagi rezultatov medsebojnega ocenjevanja se bo na ravni Skupnosti lahko določilo, za katere vrste dejavnosti je treba sisteme dovoljenj odpraviti.
The results of the process of mutual evaluation will make it possible to determine, at Community level, the types of activity for which authorisation schemes should be eliminated.
Ta direktiva ne bi smela posegati v možnost držav članic, da prekličejo izdana dovoljenja, če niso več izpolnjeni pogoji za izdajo dovoljenja.
This Directive should be without prejudice to the possibility for Member States to withdraw authorisations after they have been issued, if the conditions for the granting of the authorisation are no longer fulfilled.
V skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča so javno zdravje, varstvo potrošnikov, zdravje živali in varstvo urbanega okolja pomembni razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
According to the case law of the Court of Justice, public health, consumer protection, animal health and the protection of the urban environment constitute overriding reasons relating to the public interest.
Ti pomembni razlogi lahko upravičujejo uporabo sistemov dovoljenj in drugih omejitev.
Such overriding reasons may justify the application of authorisation schemes and other restrictions.
Vendar sistemi dovoljenj in omejitve ne bi smeli biti diskriminatorni na podlagi državljanstva.
However, no such authorisation scheme or restriction should discriminate on grounds of nationality.
Hkrati bi bilo treba vedno spoštovati načeli nujnosti in sorazmernosti.
Further, the principles of necessity and proportionality should always be respected.
Določbe te direktive v zvezi s sistemi dovoljenj bi morale zadevati primere, v katerih glede začetka opravljanja ali opravljanju dejavnosti s strani gospodarskih subjektov odloči pristojni organ.
The provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes should concern cases where the access to or exercise of a service activity by operators requires a decision by a competent authority.
Ker ta direktiva ne zajema predpisov o javnih naročilih, to ne zadeva niti odločitev pristojnih organov o ustanovitvi javnega ali zasebnega subjekta za opravljanje določene storitve niti sklepanja pogodb s strani pristojnih organov o opravljanju določene storitve, ki jo urejajo predpisi o javnih naročilih.
This concerns neither decisions by competent authorities to set up a public or private entity for the provision of a particular service nor the conclusion of contracts by competent authorities for the provision of a particular service which is governed by rules on public procurement, since this Directive does not deal with rules on public procurement.
Za lažji začetek opravljanja in opravljanje storitvenih dejavnosti je treba oceniti sisteme dovoljenj in njihovo upravičenost ter poročati o njih.
In order to facilitate access to and exercise of service activities, it is important to evaluate and report on authorisation schemes and their justification.
Navedena obveznost poročanja se nanaša samo na obstoj sistemov dovoljenj, ne pa na merila in pogoje za izdajo dovoljenja.
This reporting obligation concerns only the existence of authorisation schemes and not the criteria and conditions for the granting of an authorisation.
Dovoljenje bi moralo ponudniku praviloma omogočiti začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti na celotnem nacionalnem ozemlju, razen v primeru, če je ozemeljsko omejevanje utemeljeno s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
The authorisation should as a general rule enable the provider to have access to the service activity, or to exercise that activity, throughout the national territory, unless a territorial limit is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Varstvo okolja na primer lahko upravičuje zahtevo za pridobitev posameznega dovoljenja za vsako tehnično nameščanje na nacionalnem ozemlju.
For example, environmental protection may justify the requirement to obtain an individual authorisation for each installation on the national territory.
Ta določba ne bi smela vplivati na regionalne ali lokalne pristojnosti za izdajo dovoljenj v državah članicah.
This provision should not affect regional or local competences for the granting of authorisations within the Member States.
Določba, ki se nanaša na nepodvajanje pogojev za izdajo dovoljenj, državam članicam ne bi smela preprečevati uporabe svojih pogojev, opredeljenih v sistemu dovoljenj.
The provision relating to the non-duplication of conditions for the granting of an authorisation should not prevent Member States from applying their own conditions as specified in the authorisation scheme.
Zahtevati bi morala le, da pristojni organi ob ugotavljanju, ali prosilec izpolnjuje pogoje, upoštevajo enakovredne pogoje, ki jih je prosilec že izpolnil v drugi državi članici.
It should only require that competent authorities, when considering whether these conditions are met by the applicant, take into account the equivalent conditions which have already been satisfied by the applicant in another Member State.
Ta določba ne bi smela predpisati uporabe pogojev za izdajo dovoljenj, ki so določeni v sistemu dovoljenj druge države članice.
This provision should not require the application of the conditions for the granting of an authorisation provided for in the authorisation scheme of another Member State.
Če je število razpoložljivih dovoljenj za določeno dejavnost omejeno zaradi pomanjkanja naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti, bi bilo treba sprejeti postopek za izbiranje med več možnimi kandidati, tako da se v okviru javnega natečaja dosežejo kakovost in pogoji za storitve, ki so prejemniku na voljo.
Where the number of authorisations available for an activity is limited because of scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity, a procedure for selection from among several potential candidates should be adopted with the aim of developing through open competition the quality and conditions for supply of services available to users.
Takšen postopek bi moral zagotavljati preglednost in nepristranskost ter omogočati, da odobreno dovoljenje nima predolgega obdobja veljavnosti, da se ne podaljšuje samodejno in da ponudniku, kateremu je dovoljenje pravkar poteklo, ne dodeljuje nobenih ugodnosti.
Such a procedure should provide guarantees of transparency and impartiality and the authorisation thus granted should not have an excessive duration, be subject to automatic renewal or confer any advantage on the provider whose authorisation has just expired.
Veljavnost izdanega dovoljenja bi morala biti določena zlasti tako, da svobodne konkurence ne omejuje bolj, kot je to potrebno za poplačilo stroška naložbe ponudniku in primeren donos na vloženi kapital.
In particular, the duration of the authorisation granted should be fixed in such a way that it does not restrict or limit free competition beyond what is necessary in order to enable the provider to recoup the cost of investment and to make a fair return on the capital invested.
Ta določba ne bi smela preprečevati državam članicam, da omejijo število dovoljenj zaradi drugih razlogov poleg omejenosti naravnih virov ali tehničnih zmogljivosti.
This provision should not prevent Member States from limiting the number of authorisations for reasons other than scarcity of natural resources or technical capacity.
Ta dovoljenja bi morala biti predmet tistih določb te direktive, ki se nanašajo na sisteme dovoljenj.
These authorisations should remain in any case subject to the other provisions of this Directive relating to authorisation schemes.
V primeru, da drugačne ureditve ne obstajajo in če v določenem roku ni odgovora, bi se moralo šteti, da je dovoljenje izdano.
In the absence of different arrangements, failing a response within a time period, an authorisation should be deemed to have been granted.
Vendar se za nekatere dejavnosti lahko sprejme drugačna ureditev, če je ta objektivno utemeljena s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, vključno z zakonitim interesom tretjih oseb.
However, different arrangements may be put in place in respect of certain activities, where objectively justified by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, including a legitimate interest of third parties.
Takšne drugačne ureditve lahko vključujejo nacionalne predpise, v skladu s katerimi se v primeru, če pristojni organ prosilcu ne odgovori, prošnja za izdajo dovoljenja šteje kot zavrnjena ter je takšno odločitev mogoče izpodbijati pred sodišči.
Such different arrangements could include national rules according to which, in the absence of a response of the competent authority, the application is deemed to have been rejected, this rejection being open to challenge before the courts.
Za vzpostavitev dejanskega notranjega trga storitev je treba odpraviti vse omejitve svobode ustanavljanja in prostega pretoka storitev, ki jih še vedno vsebujejo predpisi nekaterih držav članic in niso v skladu s členoma 43 in 49 Pogodbe.
In order to establish a genuine internal market for services, it is necessary to abolish any restrictions on the freedom of establishment and the free movement of services which are still enshrined in the laws of certain Member States and which are incompatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the Treaty respectively.
Omejitve, ki jih je treba prepovedati in ki zlasti vplivajo na notranji trg storitev, se morajo sistematično odpraviti v najkrajšem možnem času.
The restrictions to be prohibited particularly affect the internal market for services and should be systematically dismantled as soon as possible.
Svoboda ustanavljanja temelji zlasti na načelu enake obravnave, ki ne prepoveduje le diskriminacije na podlagi državljanstva, ampak tudi posredno diskriminacijo na drugih podlagah, ki imajo lahko enake posledice.
Freedom of establishment is predicated, in particular, upon the principle of equal treatment, which entails the prohibition not only of any discrimination on grounds of nationality but also of any indirect discrimination based on other grounds but capable of producing the same result.
Tako za začetek opravljanja ali za opravljanje storitvenih dejavnosti, bodisi kot glavnih bodisi kot sekundarnih dejavnosti, v državi članici ne bi smela veljati merila, kot so sedež, prebivališče, stalno bivališče ali glavno opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti.
Thus, access to a service activity or the exercise thereof in a Member State, either as a principal or secondary activity, should not be made subject to criteria such as place of establishment, residence, domicile or principal provision of the service activity.
Vendar ta merila ne bi smela zajemati zahtev, v skladu s katerimi mora biti ponudnik storitev ali eden izmed njegovih uslužbencev prisoten pri izvajanju dejavnosti, kadar je to utemeljeno s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes.
However, these criteria should not include requirements according to which a provider or one of his employees or a representative must be present during the exercise of the activity when this is justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest.
Poleg tega država članica ne bi smela omejevati pravne sposobnosti ali pravice do sprožitve pravnega postopka družbam, ustanovljenim v skladu s predpisi druge države članice, na ozemlju katere imajo glavni sedež.
Furthermore, a Member State should not restrict the legal capacity or the right of companies, incorporated in accordance with the law of another Member State on whose territory they have their primary establishment, to bring legal proceedings.
Država članica prav tako ne bi smela dajati nobene prednosti ponudnikom, ki imajo posebno nacionalno ali lokalno socialno-ekonomsko povezavo; niti ne bi smela na podlagi sedeža omejevati svobode ponudnika, da pridobiva ali izkorišča pravice in blago ali z njimi razpolaga ali da dostopa do različnih vrst posojil ali namestitve, če so te odločitve koristne za začetek opravljanja ali učinkovito upravljanje dejavnosti.
Moreover, a Member State should not be able to confer any advantages on providers having a particular national or local socio-economic link; nor should it be able to restrict, on grounds of place of establishment, the provider's freedom to acquire, exploit or dispose of rights and goods or to access different forms of credit or accommodation in so far as those choices are useful for access to his activity or for the effective exercise thereof.
Začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje storitvene dejavnosti ne bi smelo biti predmet kakršnega koli ekonomskega preskusa.
Access to or the exercise of a service activity in the territory of a Member State should not be subject to an economic test.
Prepoved ekonomskih preizkusov kot predpogoja za izdajo dovoljenja bi morala zadevati ekonomske preizkuse kot take, ne pa tudi zahtev, ki jih objektivno utemeljujejo pomembne razloge, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, kot so varstvo mestnega okolja, cilji socialne politike in javnega zdravja.
The prohibition of economic tests as a prerequisite for the grant of authorisation should cover economic tests as such, but not requirements which are objectively justified by overriding reasons relating to the public interest, such as the protection of the urban environment, social policy or public health.
Ta prepoved ne bi smela vplivati na izvajanje pristojnosti organov, odgovornih za uporabo konkurenčnega prava.
The prohibition should not affect the exercise of the powers of the authorities responsible for applying competition law.
V zvezi s finančnimi jamstvi in zavarovanji bi morala prepoved zahtev zadevati samo obveznost, da mora zahtevano finančno jamstvo ali zavarovanje dati finančna institucija s sedežem v zadevni državi članici.
With respect to financial guarantees or insurance, the prohibition of requirements should concern only the obligation that the requested financial guarantees or insurance must be obtained from a financial institution established in the Member State concerned.
V zvezi s predhodno registracijo bi morala prepoved zahtev zadevati samo obveznost, da je ponudnik pred ustanovitvijo sedeža za določen čas predhodno registriran v registru zadevne države članice.
With respect to pre-registration, the prohibition of requirements should concern only the obligation that the provider, prior to the establishment, be pre-registered for a given period in a register held in the Member State concerned.
Da bo posodabljanje nacionalnih predpisov skladno z zahtevami notranjega trga, je treba oceniti določene nediskriminatorne nacionalne zahteve, ki bi lahko po svoji naravi v okviru svobode ustanavljanja resno omejile ali celo preprečile začetek opravljanja ali opravljanje dejavnosti.
In order to coordinate the modernisation of national rules and regulations in a manner consistent with the requirements of the internal market, it is necessary to evaluate certain non-discriminatory national requirements which, by their very nature, could severely restrict or even prevent access to an activity or the exercise thereof under the freedom of establishment.
Ta postopek ocenjevanja bi moral biti omejen z združljivostjo teh zahtev z merili za svobodo ustanavljanja, ki jih je že določilo Sodišče.
This evaluation process should be limited to the compatibility of these requirements with the criteria already established by the Court of Justice on the freedom of establishment.
Ne bi smelo zadevati uporabe konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
It should not concern the application of Community competition law.
Če so takšne zahteve diskriminatorne, niso objektivno utemeljene s pomembnimi razlogi, ki se nanašajo na javni interes, ali so nesorazmerne, jih je treba odpraviti ali spremeniti.
Where such requirements are discriminatory or not objectively justified by an overriding reason relating to the public interest, or where they are disproportionate, they must be abolished or amended.
Rezultat tega ocenjevanja se bo razlikoval glede na vrsto dejavnosti in zadevni javni interes.
The outcome of this assessment will be different according to the nature of the activity and the public interest concerned.
Takšne zahteve bi bile lahko v celoti utemeljene zlasti takrat, kadar bi uveljavljale cilje socialne politike.
In particular, such requirements could be fully justified when they pursue social policy objectives.
Za namene te direktive in brez poseganja v člen 16 Pogodbe se lahko storitve obravnavajo kot storitve splošnega ekonomskega pomena samo, če se opravljajo pri izvajanju posebnih nalog javnega pomena, za katere je zadevna država članica zadolžila ponudnika.
For the purposes of this Directive, and without prejudice to Article 16 of the Treaty, services may be considered to be services of general economic interest only if they are provided in application of a special task in the public interest entrusted to the provider by the Member State concerned.
Ta zadolžitev bi morala biti določena v enem ali več aktih, katerih vrsto določi vsaka zadevna država članica, in bi morala natančno določiti naravo posebne naloge.
This assignment should be made by way of one or more acts, the form of which is determined by the Member State concerned, and should specify the precise nature of the special task.
Postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja, predviden v tej direktivi, ne bi smel vplivati na svobodo držav članic, da v zakonodaji določijo višjo raven zaščite javnih interesov, še zlasti za doseganje ciljev socialne politike.
The mutual evaluation process provided for in this Directive should not affect the freedom of Member States to set in their legislation a high level of protection of the public interest, in particular in relation to social policy objectives.
Nadalje mora postopek medsebojnega ocenjevanja v celoti upoštevati posebnosti storitev splošnega ekonomskega pomena in posebnih nalog, ki so jim dodeljene.
Furthermore, it is necessary that the mutual evaluation process take fully into account the specificity of services of general economic interest and of the particular tasks assigned to them.
Te lahko upravičijo določene omejitve svobode ustanavljanja, zlasti v primerih, ko takšne omejitve uveljavljajo cilje varovanja javnega zdravja in socialne politike ter ko izpolnjujejo pogoje iz člena 15(3)(a) do (c).
This may justify certain restrictions on the freedom of establishment, in particular where such restrictions pursue the protection of public health and social policy objectives and where they satisfy the conditions set out in Article 15(3)(a), (b) and (c).
Sodišče je na primer glede obveznosti za prevzem določene pravne oblike za izvedbo nekaterih storitev na socialnem področju že priznalo, da je zahteva, da ponudnik storitev deluje nepridobitno, utemeljena.
For example, with regard to the obligation to take a specific legal form in order to exercise certain services in the social field, the Court of Justice has already recognised that it may be justified to subject the provider to a requirement to be non-profit making.