natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da je februarja 2004 takratni poročevalec glede te zadeve pozval Evropski parlament, naj zoper Evropsko komisijo sproži postopek pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti zaradi neodgovarjanja na vprašanja, ki jih je zastavil Evropski parlament, glede izvajanja direktive v zadevnem obdobju, in priznava, da Parlament v tem primeru o tej zahtevi uradno ni glasoval,
recalling that in February 2004 the then rapporteur on this issue called for the European Parliament to initiate proceedings before the European Court of Justice against the European Commission for failure to answer the questions raised by the European Parliament concerning the implementation of the Directive during the period in question, and recognising that on this occasion Parliament did not vote formally on this request,
ker Parlament v svoji resoluciji z marca 2004 o dvajsetem letnem poročilu o spremljanju prava Skupnosti "močno obžaluje ravnanje Komisije v odnosu do Parlamenta, zlasti njenega pristojnega odbora v primeru Lloyd's iz Londona, v zvezi s katerim Komisija trdovratno zavrača celotno komunikacijo s Parlamentom o vseh vprašanjih, ki jih je ta zastavil",
whereas, in its resolution of 9 March 2004 on the 20th Annual Report on monitoring the application of Community law, Parliament ‘strongly deplores the conduct of the Commission towards Parliament and, in particular, its competent committee in the case concerning Lloyd’s of London, in relation to which there has been an obstinate refusal to communicate fully with Parliament on all questions it has raised’,
ob upoštevanju, da je pristojni odbor aprila 2004 priporočil, da je treba proti Komisiji sprožiti pravni postopek, ko bodo izpolnjene vse postopkovne zahteve, vendar pa je predsednik Evropskega parlamenta sedaj razsodil, da morajo biti zaenkrat takšne proceduralne zahteve šele izpolnjene,
considering that the competent committee recommended in April 2004 that legal proceedings should be initiated against the Commission once the full procedural requirements had been met, but that the President of Parliament has now ruled that such procedural requirements have yet to be fulfilled,
poziva Evropsko komisijo k pripravi konkretnega odgovora na vprašanja, zastavljena v poročilu iz septembra 2003 (Perryjevo poročilo), bodisi na tej razpravi bodisi v dveh mesecih v pisni obliki, ter namerava v skladu s členom 232 Pogodbe sprožiti postopek proti Komisiji, če ta ne bi dala odgovora;
Calls on the Commission to provide a specific response to the questions raised in the report of September 2003 (Perry report) either in this debate or within two months in writing and resolves to initiate proceedings pursuant to Article 232 of the Treaty against the Commission should the Commission fail to respond;
si pridržuje pravico do vpeljave nadaljnjih preiskovalnih ukrepov, če bodo ti potrebni, ob upoštevanju treh novih peticij, ki so jih drugi Lloydovi solastniki vložili leta 2005 glede iste direktive;
Reserves the right to initiate further investigatory measures should they be required, bearing in mind three new petitions which have been tabled in 2005 concerning the same Directive by other Lloyd’s Names;
o predlogu Komisije za Odločbo Sveta o spremembi Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku
on the Commission proposal for a Council Decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Komisije za Odločbo Sveta o spremembi Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku
European Parliament resolution on the Commission proposal for a Council Decision amending for the purposes of adapting to the technical progress the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment
Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi zaradi prilagoditve tehničnemu napredku (KOM-AC_DR(2005)CMT-2005-1948-2),
19. of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (COM-AC_DR(2005)CMT-2005-1948‑2),
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2003/11/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 6. februarja 2003 o štiriindvajseti spremembi Direktive Sveta 76/769/EGS v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov (pentabromodifenil etra, oktabromodifenil etra) UL L 42, 15.2.2003, str.
having regard to Directive 2003/11/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 6 February 2003 amending for the 24th time Council Directive 76/769/EEC relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of dangerous substances and preparations (pentabromodiphenyl ether, octabromodiphenylether) OJ L 42, 15.2.2003, p.
ker je eden od ciljev Direktive 2000/95/ES prispevati k zaščiti človekovega zdravja, okolju prijazni predelavi in odlaganju odpadne električne in elektronske opreme; ker člen 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES prepoveduje uporabo določenih nevarnih snovi v novi električni in elektronski opremi, ki bo dana na trg po 1. juliju 2006, razen če je v prilogi predvidena kot izjema,
whereas one of the objectives of Directive 2002/95/EC is to contribute to the protection of human health and the environmentally sound recovery and disposal of waste electrical and electronic equipment; whereas Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC restricts the use of certain hazardous substances in new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market from 1 July 2006 unless exempted under the Annex,
ker odbor, ustanovljen v skladu s členom 7 Direktive 2002/95/ES, 19. aprila 2005 ni sprejel pozitivnega mnenja glede osnutka odločbe Komisije o spremembi Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES, v kateri se prednostno ocenjevanje posameznih postavk črta, doda pa se dve novi izjemi (decabromodifenileter (DecaBDE) v uporabi polimerov, svinec v svinčeno-bronastih ležajnih skodelah in pušah); ker je 8. junija 2005 Parlament prejel predlog Komisije za Odločbo Sveta o spremembi Priloge k Direktivi 2002/95/ES na enak način,
whereas, on 19 April 2005, the committee established under Article 7 of Directive 2002/95/EC did not adopt a favourable opinion on a draft Commission Decision to amend the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC deleting a priority evaluation of certain items and adding two new exemptions to the Annex (DecaBDE in polymeric applications, lead in bronze-bearing shells and bushes); whereas, on 8 June 2005, Parliament received a Commission proposal for a Council Decision to amend the Annex to Directive 2002/95/EC in the same way,
ker člen 5(5) Sklepa 1999/468/ES daje Parlamentu pravico, da sprejme resolucijo z namenom obvestiti Svet, da predlog Komisije presega izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena v tem temeljnem aktu UL L 184, 17.7.1999, str.
whereas Article 5(5) of Decision 1999/468/EC lays down Parliament’s right to adopt a resolution to inform the Council that a proposal by the Commission ‘exceeds the implementing powers provided for in that basic instrument’ OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p.
ker člen 5(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES predvideva sprejetje sprememb, potrebnih za prilagoditev priloge znanstvenemu in tehničnemu napredku v komitologiji, ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES predvideva možnost izvzetja nevarnih snovi iz prepovedi, če zamenjava z varnejšimi alternativami ni možna "izvzetje materialov in komponent električne in elektronske opreme iz člena 4(1), če je tehnično ali znanstveno neizvedljivo, da se jih odstrani ali nadomesti s spremembo konstrukcije ali z materiali in komponentami, ki ne zahtevajo katerega od materialov ali snovi iz tega člena, ali kadar bi negativni vplivi na okolje, zdravje in/ali varnost potrošnika, ki bi jih povzročila nadomestitev, utegnili prevladati nad prednostmi za okolje, zdravje in/ali varnostjo potrošnika", ; ker člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES določa edino merilo, ki ga je mogoče upoštevati pri dodajanju izjem v prilogo v komitologiji,
whereas Article 5(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for the adoption of any amendments necessary to adapt the Annex to scientific and technical progress in comitology; whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC provides for the possibility of exempting hazardous substances from the prohibition if the substitution with safer alternatives is not practicable ‘ exempting materials and components of electrical and electronic equipment from Article 4(1) if their elimination or substitution via design changes or materials and components which do not require any of the materials or substances referred to therein is technically or scientifically impracticable, or where the negative environmental, health and/or consumer safety impacts caused by substitution are likely to outweigh the environmental, health and/or consumer safety benefits thereof’. ; whereas Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC lays down the only criteria that can be taken into consideration with a view to adding exemptions to the Annex in comitology,
ker Komisija v uvodni izjavi 2 predlagane odločbe trdi, da so nekateri materiali in komponente, ki vsebujejo določene nevarne snovi, izvzeti iz prepovedi, ker je "izločitev ali nadomestitev teh nevarnih snovi v navedenih posebnih materialih in komponentah še vedno neizvedljiva"; ker so v nasprotju s tem številne študije pokazale, da so varnejše alternative k DecaBDE v smislu člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES na razpolago za večino, če ne za vse, uporabe polimerov v električni in elektronski opremi,
whereas the Commission asserts in recital 2 of the proposed decision that certain materials and components containing certain hazardous substances should be exempt from the prohibition, since the ‘elimination or substitution of these hazardous substances in those specific materials and components is still impracticable’; whereas several studies have shown to the contrary that safer alternatives to DecaBDE covered by Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are available for many, if not all, polymeric applications in electrical and electronic equipment,
ker Komisija v uvodni izjavi 3 trdi, da "ker je v oceni tveganja za DecaBDE (...) navedeno, da trenutno ni potrebe po ukrepih za znižanje tveganja za potrošnike (...), se DecaBDE lahko izvzame iz zahtev člena 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES"; ker je treba za splošne zakonodajne ukrepe v EU upoštevati vse dele znanstvenih ocen tveganja kot tudi mnenje ustreznega znanstvenega odbora; ker upoštevanje tveganja pri snovi, navedeni v členu 4(1) Direktive 2002/95/ES, ni vključeno v člen 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES in zato ne more služiti kot obrazložitev za spremembo priloge v komitologiji; ker bi takšen pregled zahteval zakonodajni predlog na podlagi člena 251 Pogodbe,
whereas the Commission asserts in recital 3 that ‘since the risk assessment of DecaBDE (…) has concluded that there is at present no need for measures to reduce risks for consumers (…), DecaBDE can be exempted from the requirements of Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC’; whereas all parts of scientific risk assessments as well as the opinion of the relevant scientific committee should be taken into account for general legislative measures in the EU; whereas risk considerations as such of a substance listed in Article 4(1) of Directive 2002/95/EC are, however, not included in Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC and can therefore not serve as a justification for amending the Annex in comitology; whereas such a revision would require a legislative proposal pursuant to Article 251 of the Treaty,
ker ne glede na nedopustnost premislekov glede tveganja v komitologiji predlagana odločitev ne upošteva ugotovitev dodatne ocene tveganja za okolje iz maja 2004, ki so pokazale, da je DecaBDE zelo obstojen in ki so predstavile podatke o razširjenosti med največjimi plenilci in na Arktiki, nevrotoksičnih učinkih, zaužitju snovi s strani sesalcev, v laboratorijskih raziskavah, ter morebitno oblikovanje še bolj strupenih in akumulativnih izdelkov kot so med drugim nizko bromirani difenil etri; ker sta trženje in uporaba vsega na trgu razpoložljivega nizko bromiranega difenil etra prepovedana z Direktivo 2003/11/ES z dne 15. avgusta 2004,
whereas, without prejudice to the non-admissibility of risk considerations in comitology, the proposed decision ignores findings from the additional environment risk assessment of May 2004, which found DecaBDE to be very persistent, and which presented data on widespread occurrence in top predators and the Arctic, neurotoxic effects, uptake of the substance by mammals in laboratory studies and possible formation of more toxic and accumulative products such as inter alia lower brominated diphenyl ether congeners; whereas the marketing and use of all commercially available lower brominated diphenyl ether congeners has been banned by Directive 2003/11/EC as of 15 August 2004,
ker predlagana odločba nasprotuje mnenju znanstvenega odbora Komisije za zdravstvena in okoljska tveganja z dne 18. marca 2005, ki močno priporoča nadaljnje zmanjšanje tveganja na osnovi zgornje ocene tveganja,
whereas the proposed decision goes against the opinion of the Commission’s own Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks of 18 March 2005, which ‘strongly recommends further risk reduction’ on the basis of the above risk assessment,
ker predlagana odločba onemogoča enega od ciljev Direktive 2002/95/ES in nasprotuje izrecni želji sozakonodajalcev, kot je izražena v uvodni izjavi 6 Direktive 2003/11/ES, v kateri Parlament in Svet nemudoma zahtevata nadaljnje ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganja zaradi DecaBDE, razen če bi nadaljnja ocena tveganja pokazala, da DecaBDE ni razlog za skrb; ker dodatna ocena tveganja namesto tega dokazuje, da obstaja dodatni razlog za zaskrbljenost,
whereas the proposed decision frustrates one of the objectives of Directive 2002/95/EC and goes against the explicit will of the co-legislators as expressed in recital 6 of Directive 2003/11/EC, in which Parliament and Council demanded further risk reduction measures on DecaBDE without delay, unless the further risk assessment concluded that DecaBDE gave no cause for concern; whereas the additional risk assessment instead provides further evidence of concern,
meni, da Komisija ni ravnala v skladu s členom 5(1)(b) Direktive 2002/95/ES ter je zaradi tega prekoračila izvedbena pooblastila, predvidena v tej direktivi;
Considers that the Commission has not acted in accordance with Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/95/EC and has therefore exceeded the implementing powers provided for in that Directive;
poziva Svet, naj nasprotuje predlogu, če ga Komisija ne bi spremenila tako, da bi umaknila del v zvezi z DecaBDE;
Calls on the Council to oppose the proposal, should the Commission not amend it by withdrawing the part on DecaBDE;
ki ga v skladu s členom 113 Poslovnika
pursuant to Rule 113 of the Rules of Procedure
vlagajo Adriana Poli Bortone (UEN), Mario Mantovani (PPE) in Luciana Sbarbati (ELDR)
by Adriana Poli Bortone (UEN), Mario Mantovani (PPE) and Luciana Sbarbati (ELDR)
o uvozu obutve iz Kitajske
on footwear imports from China
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o uvozu obutve iz Kitajske
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on footwear imports from China
ker se je uvoz obutve iz Kitajske v letu 2005 povečal za približno 700 % v primerjavi z lanskim letom, cene pa so se znižale za 28 %;
whereas in the course of 2005, footwear imports from China have increased by approximately 700% over the 2004 figure and prices have fallen by 28%,
ker bodo po sporazumu, ki sta ga Evropska komisija in kitajska vlada podpisali v Šanghaju dne 10. junija 2005, stopile v veljavo nove izvozne kvote tekstilnih izdelkov;
whereas in the wake of the agreement signed in Shanghai on 10 June 2005 by the Commission and the Chinese Government, new textile-product export quotas will come into force,
ker je komisar Frattini izjavil, da bo Evropska komisija predstavila predlog direktive za boj proti ponarejanju in krepitev pravic do intelektualne lastnine;
whereas Mr Frattini (Commissioner) has stated that the Commission will submit a proposal for a directive designed to combat counterfeiting and to bolster intellectual-property rights,
ker je prepovedano dati na trg izdelke iz sestavnih delov, ki so škodljivi za zdravje ljudi, vendar je dovoljeno uvažati iz izvenevropskih držav čevlje, izdelane s kemičnimi izdelki, prepovedanimi v EU;
whereas products containing components which are harmful to human health may not be placed on the market, but whereas shoes manufactured from chemical products banned in the EU may be imported from countries outside Europe,
odobrava, da je Komisija začela preiskovalni postopek o uvozu obutve iz Kitajske, ki predvideva postopek spremljanja in nadzorovanja za 33 različnih izdelkov iz obutvenega sektorja;
welcoming the Commission's launch of an investigation into footwear imports from China, which involves a procedure for monitoring 33 different products (all from the footwear sector),
vendar poziva Komisijo, da:
Calls nonetheless on the Commission to:
- po ustreznih preiskavah v kratkem času sprejme ad hoc zaščitne ukrepe glede uvoza kitajske obutve;
- adopt - at an early opportunity, once appropriate inquiries have been carried out - ad hoc safeguard measures in respect of footwear imports from China;
- predvidi, da morajo izdelki, uvoženi v EU, imeti žig z navedbo izvora.
- make it mandatory for products imported into the EU to be stamped with their place of origin.
za zaključek razprave o izjavi Komisije
to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
- Anders Wijkman in John Bowis v imenu skupine PPE-DE
- Anders Wijkman and John Bowis, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
- Guido Sacconi, Linda McAvan, Glenys Kinnock in Marie-Arlette Carlotti, v imenu skupine PSE
- Guido Sacconi, Linda McAvan, Glenys Kinnock and Marie-Arlette Carlotti, on behalf of the PSE Group
- Chris Davies in Fiona Hall, v imenu skupine ALDE
- Chris Davies and Fiona Hall, on behalf of the ALDE Group
- Satu Hassi, Monica Frassoni in Alain Lipietz, v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
- Satu Hassi, Monica Frassoni and Alain Lipietz, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
- Jonas Sjöstedt in Ilda Figueiredo, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
- Jonas Sjöstedt and Ilda Figueiredo, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
- Brian Crowley, Cristiana Muscardini, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis in Inese Vaidere, v imenu skupine UEN
- Brian Crowley, Cristiana Muscardini, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis and Inese Vaidere, on behalf of the UEN Group
- in Johannes Blokland
- and Johannes Blokland
za pospešitev izvajanja akcijskega načrta EU za uveljavitev zakonodaje, upravljanja in trgovanja na področju gozdov (FLEGT)
on speeding up implementation of the EU action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o akcijskem načrtu EU glede uveljavitve zakonodaje, upravljanja in trgovanja na področju gozdov (FLEGT)
European Parliament resolution on speeding up implementation of the EU action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT)
ob upoštevanju sklepa 1600/2002 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o ustanovitvi 6. okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti,
having regard to Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 22 July 2002, establishing the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme,
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta EU za FLEGT ("Uveljavitev zakonodaje, upravljanje in trgovanje na področju gozdov" (FLEGT) - predlog akcijskega načrta EU") z dne 21. maja 2003, ki so ga podprli sklepi Sveta za kmetijstvo o FLEGT (2003/C 268/01) z dne 13. oktobra 20031 UL C 268, 7.11.2003, str.
having regard to the EU action plan on FLEGT ('Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) - Proposal for an EU Action Plan') of 21 May 2003, which was endorsed by the Agriculture Council conclusions of 13 October 2003 on FLEGT OJ C 268, 7.11.203, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za kmetijstvo o FLEGT z dne 21. in 22. decembra 2004,
having regard to the Agriculture Council conclusions of 21 and 22 December 2004 on FLEGT,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za okolje glede zaustavitve zmanjševanja biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 z dne 28. junija 2004,
having regard to the Environment Council conclusions of 28 June 2004 on halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010,
ob upoštevanju pisma z mnenjem Odbora za industrijo, zunanjo trgovino, raziskave in energetiko (ITRE) Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije v zvezi z uveljavitvijo zakonodaje, upravljanja in trgovanja na področju gozdov (FLEGT), predlog akcijskega načrta ( B5 - 0397/2003),
having regard to the opinion in letter form of 19 January 2004 of Parliament's Committee on Industry, Trade, Research and Energy (ITRE) on the Commission Communication on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT), Proposal for an Action Plan ( B5-0397/2003 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta o ustanovitvi prostovoljne sheme za izdajanje dovoljenj FLEGT za uvoz lesa v Evropsko skupnost2 KOM(2004)515 končno, 20.7.2004 ,
having regard to the proposal for a Council Regulation concerning the establishment of a voluntary FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community COM (2004) 515 final of 20 July 2004. ,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega sodišča C-2/2000 z dne 6. decembra 2001 glede Uredbe(ES) št. 1946/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. julija 2003 o čezmejnih gibanjih genetsko spremenjenih organizmov,
having regard to Opinion C-2/00 of 6 December 2001 of the European Court of Justice regarding Regulation (EC) No 1946/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2003 on transboundary movements of genetically modified organisms,
ker nezakonita sečnja pripomore k krčenju gozdov in zmanjševanju biotske raznovrstnosti ter vpliva na spremembe podnebja; podžiga državljanske vojne in ogroža mednarodno varnost prek podkupovanja, organiziranega kriminala in zlorabe človekovih pravic;
whereas illegal logging contributes to deforestation, loss of biodiversity and impacts on climate change; fuels civil wars and threatens international security through bribery, organised crime and human rights abuses,
ker Evropska unija kot ena od največjih uvoznic lesa in lesnih izdelkov nosi posebno odgovornost do mednarodne skupnosti in držav v razvoju,
whereas the European Union, as one of the major importers of timber and timber products, has a particular responsibility with regard to the international community and developing countries,
ker poceni uvoz nezakonitega lesa in lesnih proizvodov pa tudi neizpolnjevanje osnovnih socialnih in okoljskih standardov s strani nekaterih industrijskih akterjev destabilizira notranje trge, zmanjšuje davčne prihodke držav proizvajalk in ogroža delovna mesta v državah uvoznicah in izvoznicah;
whereas cheap imports of illegal timber and forest products, together with non-compliance by some industry players with basic social and environmental standards, destabilises international markets, cuts tax revenue of producer countries and threatens jobs in importing and exporting countries,
ker nelojalna konkurenca, ki temelji na razširjenosti nezakonitih praks škoduje tistim evropskim družbam, zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, ki se ravnajo odgovorno in spoštujejo obstoječe pravne predpise;
whereas unfair competition based on widespread illegal practices harms those European companies, particularly small and medium-sized businesses, which behave responsibly and respect the existing legal provisions,