natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
za odškodnino zaradi delne izgube, poškodovanja ali zamude pri izročitvi, od dneva izročitve;
for compensation for partial loss, damage or delay in delivery, from the day when delivery took place;
Za zadržanje in prekinitev zastaralnega roka sicer velja notranja zakonodaja.
Otherwise, the suspension and interruption of periods of limitation shall be governed by national law.
Medsebojni odnosi prevoznikov
Relations between Carriers
Vsak prevoznik, ki je dobil plačano ali bi moral zahtevati plačilo prevoznine, mora prevoznikom, ki sodelujejo pri prevozu, plačati delež prevoznine, ki jim pripada.
Any carrier who has collected or ought to have collected a carriage charge must pay to the carriers concerned their respective shares of such a charge.
Načine plačila določijo prevozniki z medsebojnimi sporazumi.
The methods of payment shall be fixed by agreement between the carriers.
Tretji odstavek 6. člena, tretji odstavek 16. člena in 25. člen veljajo tudi za odnose med zaporednimi prevozniki.
Article 6(3), Article 16(3) and Article 25 shall also apply to the relations between successive carriers.
Če je prevoznik po teh enotnih pravilih plačal odškodnino, mu pripada pravica do povrnitve stroškov do prevoznikov, ki so sodelovali pri prevozu, po teh določbah:
A carrier who has paid compensation pursuant to these Uniform Rules shall have a right of recourse against the carriers who have taken part in the carriage in accordance with the following provisions:
prevoznik, ki je povzročil škodo, je zanjo odgovoren sam;
the carrier who has caused the loss or damage shall be solely liable for it;
če je škodo povzročilo več prevoznikov, je vsak odgovoren za škodo, ki jo je povzročil; če taka razmejitev odgovornosti ni mogoča, se plačilo odškodnine razdeli med prevoznike v skladu s točko c);
when the loss or damage has been caused by several carriers, each shall be liable for the loss or damage he has caused; if such distinction is impossible, the compensation shall be apportioned between them in accordance with letter c);
če ni mogoče dokazati, kdo od prevoznikov je povzročil škodo, se plačilo odškodnine porazdeli med vse prevoznike, razen med tiste, ki dokažejo, da niso povzročili škode; razdeli se v razmerju deležev prevoznine, ki pripadajo posameznim prevoznikom.
if it cannot be proved which of the carriers has caused the loss or damage, the compensation shall be apportioned between all the carriers who have taken part in the carriage, except those who prove that the loss or damage was not caused by them; such apportionment shall be in proportion to their respective shares of the carriage charge.
Če je eden od teh prevoznikov plačilno nesposoben, se delež, ki bi ga moral plačati, pa ga ni, razdeli med vse druge prevoznike, ki so sodelovali pri prevozu, in sicer v razmerju deležev prevoznine, ki jim pripadajo.
In the case of insolvency of any one of these carriers, the unpaid share due from him shall be apportioned among all the other carriers who have taken part in the carriage, in proportion to their respective shares of the carriage charge.
Prevoznik, proti kateremu se v skladu z 62. členom uveljavlja pravica do povrnitve stroškov, ne more spodbijati zakonitosti plačila odškodnine, ki jo je plačal prevoznik, ki uveljavlja pravico za povrnitev stroškov, če je sodišče odškodnino določilo po tem, ko je prevoznik na podlagi pravilno vročenega obvestila o sodnem postopku dobil priložnost, da sodeluje v tem sodnem postopku.
The validity of the payment made by the carrier exercising a right of recourse pursuant to Article 62 may not be disputed by the carrier against whom the right to recourse is exercised, when compensation has been determined by a court or tribunal and when the latter carrier, duly served with notice of the proceedings, has been afforded an opportunity to intervene in the proceedings.
Sodišče, na katerem poteka glavna obravnava, določi roke za obveščanje o sodnem postopku in pristop k njemu.
The court or tribunal seized of the principal action shall determine what time shall be allowed for such notification of the proceedings and for intervention in the proceedings.
Prevoznik, ki uveljavlja pravico do povrnitve stroškov, mora proti vsem prevoznikom, s katerimi se ni mogel sporazumeti, vložiti tožbo v istem postopku; v nasprotnem primeru preneha njegova pravica do povrnitve stroškov do tistih prevoznikov, ki jih ne toži.
A carrier exercising his right of recourse must present his claim in one and the same proceedings against all the carriers with whom he has not reached a settlement, failing which he shall lose his right of recourse in the case of those against whom he has not taken proceedings.
Sodišče mora z eno samo sodbo odločiti o vseh zahtevkih za povrnitev stroškov, s katerimi se ukvarja.
The court or tribunal shall give its decision in one and the same judgment on all recourse claims brought before it.
Prevoznik, ki hoče uveljavljati svojo pravico do povrnitve stroškov na sodišču, lahko to stori na pristojnem sodišču države, v kateri ima eden od prevoznikov, ki so sodelovali pri prevozu, sedež podjetja, podružnico ali zastopstvo, ki je sklenilo prevozno pogodbo.
The carrier wishing to enforce his right of recourse may bring his action in the courts or tribunals of the State on the territory of which one of the carriers participating in the carriage has his principal place of business, or the branch or agency which concluded the contract of carriage.
Če tožeči prevoznik vloži tožbo proti več prevoznikom, lahko izbira med sodišči, pristojnimi po četrtem odstavku.
When the action must be brought against several carriers, the plaintiff carrier shall be entitled to choose the court or tribunal in which he will bring the proceedings from among those having competence pursuant to paragraph 4.
Postopki za povrnitev stroškov se ne smejo vključevati v sodni postopek za uveljavljanje odškodnine, ki ga je sprožila stranka, upravičena do nje na podlagi prevozne pogodbe.
Recourse proceedings may not be joined with proceedings for compensation taken by the person entitled under the contract of carriage.
Prevozniki imajo pravico med seboj sklepati sporazume, ki odstopajo od 61. in 62. člena.
The carriers may conclude agreements which derogate from Articles 61 and 62.
Del I: Informacije pred začetkom potovanja
Part I: Pre journey information
Splošni pogoji, ki veljajo za pogodbo;
General conditions applicable to the contract
vozni redi in pogoji najhitrejšega potovanja;
Time schedules and conditions for the fastest trip
vozni redi in pogoji potovanja po najugodnejših cenah;
Time schedules and conditions for the lowest fares
dostopnost, pogoji dostopa in razpoložljivost pripomočkov za
Accessibility, access conditions and availability on board of facilities for
osebe z omejeno sposobnostjo gibanja na vlaku;
persons with reduced mobility
dostopnost in pogoji dostopa s kolesom;
Accessibility and access conditions for bicycles
razpoložljivost sedežev v kadilskih in nekadilskih oddelkih, v prvem in drugem razredu ter v ležalnih in spalnih vagonih;
Availability of seats in smoking and non-smoking, first and second class as well as couchettes and sleeping carriages
vse dejavnosti, ki lahko privedejo do prekinitev ali zamud prevoznih storitev;
Any activities likely to disrupt or delay services
razpoložljivost storitev na vlaku;
Availability of on-board services
postopki za vračilo izgubljene prtljage;
Procedures for reclaiming lost luggage
postopki za vlaganje pritožb.
Procedures for the submission of complaints
Del II: Informacije med potovanjem
Part II: Information during the journey
Storitve na vlaku;
On-board services
naslednja postaja;
Next station
varnost in vprašanja o
Main connecting services
Veljavno pravo za nepogodbene obveznosti ("RIM II") ***II
Law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("ROME II") ***II
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravu, ki se uporablja za nepogodbene obveznosti ("RIM II") (9751/7/2006 – C6-0317/2006 – 2003/0168(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations ("ROME II") (9751/7/2006 – C6-0317/2006 – 2003/0168(COD) )
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (9751/7/2006 – C6-0317/2006 ) UL C 289 E, 28.11.2006, str.
having regard to the Council common position (9751/7/2006 – C6-0317/2006 ) OJ C 289 E, 28.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave UL C 157, 6.7.2006, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2003)0427 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2003)0427 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju spremenjenega predloga Komisije ( KOM(2006)0083 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the amended Commission proposal ( COM(2006)0083 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0481/2006 )
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0481/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti ter zlasti členov 61(c) in 67 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 61(c) and 67 thereof,
Evropskega parlamenta z dne 6. julija 2005 (UL C 157 E, 6.7.2006, str.
of the European Parliament of 6 July 2005 (OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
371), Skupno stališče Sveta z dne
371), Council Common Position of
Skupnost si je zadala cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
The Community has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
V skladu s členom 65(b) Pogodbe so med temi ukrepi tudi tisti, ki spodbujajo združljivost predpisov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah glede kolizije zakonov in sporov o pristojnosti.
According to Article 65(b) of the Treaty, these measures are to include those promoting the compatibility of the rules applicable in the Member States concerning the conflict of laws and of jurisdiction.
Na zasedanju v Tampereju dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 je Evropski svet potrdil načelo vzajemnega priznavanja sodb in drugih odločb pravosodnih organov kot temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih zadevah ter pozval Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta program ukrepov za izvajanje navedenega načela.
The European Council meeting in Tampere on 15 and 16 October 1999 endorsed the principle of mutual recognition of judgments and other decisions of judicial authorities as the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in civil matters and invited the Council and the Commission to adopt a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition.
Svet je dne 30. novembra 2000 sprejel skupni program ukrepov Komisije in Sveta za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah UL C 12, 15.1.2001, str.
On 30 November 2000, the Council adopted a joint Commission and Council programme of measures for implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in civil and commercial matters OJ C 12, 15.1.2001, p.
Program ukrepe za usklajevanje predpisov glede kolizije zakonov opredeljuje kot ukrepe, ki olajšujejo vzajemno priznavanje sodb.
The programme identifies measures relating to the harmonisation of conflict-of-law rules as those facilitating the mutual recognition of judgments.
S Haaškim programom UL C 53, 3.3.2005, str.
The Hague Programme OJ C 53, 3.3.2005, p.
Pravilno delovanje notranjega trga zaradi večje predvidljivosti izida pravde, pravne varnosti ter prostega pretoka sodnih odločb zahteva, da predpisi držav članic glede kolizije zakonov določajo uporabo istega nacionalnega zakona ne glede na državo sodišča, kjer je vložena tožba.
The proper functioning of the internal market creates a need, in order to improve the predictability of the outcome of litigation, certainty as to the law applicable and the free movement of judgments, for the conflict-of-law rules in the Member States to designate the same national law irrespective of the country of the court in which an action is brought.
področje uporabe in določbe te uredbe bi morale biti skladni z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
scope and the provisions of this Regulation should be consistent with Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
("Bruselj I")
("Brussels I")
Rimsko konvencijo o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti UL C 27, 26.1.1998, str.
the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations OJ C 27, 26.1.1998, p.
(Rimska konvencija)
("Rome Convention")
in s prihodnjo uredbo o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti ("RIM I")
and the future Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations ("Rome I")
Ta uredba bi se morala uporabljati ne glede na vrsto sodišča, ki obravnava postopek.
This Regulation should apply irrespective of the nature of the court or tribunal seised.
Zahtevki, nastali zaradi "acta iure imperii", bi morali vključevati zahtevke zoper uradnike, ki delujejo v imenu države in odgovornost za dejanja državnih organov, vključno z odgovornostjo javno imenovanih uslužbencev.
Claims arising out of "acta iure imperii" should include claims against officials who act on behalf of the State and liability for acts of public authorities, including liability of publicly appointed office-holders.
Zato bi bilo treba te zadeve izvzeti iz področja uporabe te uredbe.
Therefore, these matters should be excluded from the scope of this Regulation.
Družinska razmerja zajemajo starševstvo, zakonsko zvezo, svaštvo in sorodstvo v stranski vrsti.
Family relationships should cover parentage, marriage, affinity and collateral relatives.
Sklicevanje v členu 1(2) na razmerja, ki imajo primerljiv učinek kot zakonska zveza in druga družinska razmerja, naj se razlagajo v skladu s pravom države članice, v kateri je sodišče, ki obravnava postopek.
The reference in Article 1(2) to relationships having comparable effects to marriage and other family relationships should be interpreted in accordance with the law of the Member State in which the court is seised.
Pravila o koliziji zakonov, določena v tej uredbi, zajemajo tudi obveznosti, ki temeljijo na objektivni odgovornosti, usklajena pravila o dejavnikih povezave pa veljajo tudi za vprašanje sposobnosti prevzemanja odgovornosti za škodno dejanje.
The conflict-of-law rules set out in this Regulation also cover obligations based on strict liability and the harmonised rules on connecting factors also apply to the question of the capacity to incur liability in tort/delict.
Pojem nepogodbene obveznosti se v državah članicah razlikuje.
The concept of a non-contractual obligation varies from one Member State to another.
Zato bi se morala za namene te uredbe izraz nepogodbena obveznost razumeti kot avtonomen pojem.
Therefore for the purposes of this Regulation non-contractual obligation should be understood as an autonomous concept.
Enotna pravila, uporabljena ne glede na pravo, katerega uporabo določajo, lahko omogočijo preprečevanje izkrivljanja konkurence med pravdnima strankama Skupnosti.
Uniform rules applied irrespective of the law they designate may avert the risk of distortions of competition between Community litigants.
Potreba po tem, da se prepreči izkrivljanje konkurence, in zahteva po pravni varnosti morata biti podrejeni potrebi po pravičnem ravnanju v posameznih primerih, zato morajo sodišča imeti določeno mero diskrecijske pravice.
Nevertheless, the need to avoid distortions of competition and the requirement of legal certainty must be tempered by the need to do justice in individual cases, and consequently the courts must have a margin of discretion.
Načelo lex loci delicti commissi pomeni temeljno rešitev v zvezi z nepogodbenimi obveznostmi v skoraj vseh državah članicah, vendar je praktična uporaba tega načela v primeru razpršenosti dejavnikov primera na več držav lahko različna.
The principle of the lex loci delicti commissi is the basic solution for non-contractual obligations in virtually all the Member States, but the practical application of the principle where the component factors of the case are spread over several countries varies.
Takšno stanje ogroža pravno varnost.
This situation engenders uncertainty as to the law applicable.
Enotna pravila izboljšajo predvidljivost sodnih odločb in zagotovijo razumno ravnotežje med interesi osebe, za katero se zatrjuje, da nosi odgovornost in osebe, ki je utrpela škodo.
Uniform rules should enhance the foreseeability of court decisions and ensure a reasonable balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person who has sustained damage.
Povezava z državo, v kateri je neposredna škoda nastala (lex loci damni), vzpostavi pravično ravnotežje med interesi osebe, za katero se zatrjuje, da nosi odgovornost in osebe, ki je utrpela škodo, in tudi odraža sodoben pristop k civilnopravni odgovornosti in k razvoju sistemov objektivne odgovornosti.
A connection with the country where the direct damage occurred (lex loci damni) strikes a fair balance between the interests of the person claimed to be liable and the person sustaining the damage, and also reflects the modern approach to civil liability and the development of systems of strict liability.
Pravo, ki se uporablja, bi se moralo določiti na podlagi tega, kje je nastala škoda, ne glede na državo ali države, v katerih lahko pride do posrednih posledic.
The law applicable should be determined on the basis of where the damage occurs, regardless of the country or countries in which the indirect consequences could occur.
Zato bi morala biti v primerih telesne poškodbe ali materialne škode na premoženju, država, v kateri je nastala škoda, tista država, v kateri je prišlo do telesne poškodbe ali kjer je nastala materialna škoda na premoženju.
Accordingly, in cases of personal injury or damage to property, the country in which the damage occurs should be the country where the injury was sustained or the property was damaged respectively.
Splošno pravilo iz te uredbe je "lex loci damni" iz člena 4(1).
The general rule in this Regulation should be the "lex loci damni" provided for in Article 4(1).
Izjema od tega splošnega načela je člen 4(2), saj vzpostavlja posebno povezavo, kadar imata stranki običajno prebivališče v isti državi.
Article 4(2) should be seen as an exception to this general principle, creating a special connection where the parties have their habitual residence in the same country.
Določbo člena 4(3) bi bilo treba razumeti kot "odstopno klavzulo" glede na člen 4(1) in (2), kadar je iz vseh okoliščin primera razvidno, da je škodno dejanje očitno v tesnejši zvezi z drugo državo.
Article 4(3) should be understood as an "escape clause" from Article 4(1) and (2), where it is clear from all the circumstances of the case that the tort/delict is manifestly more closely connected with another country.
Treba bi bilo določiti posebna pravila za primere posebnih škodnih dejanj, kjer splošno pravilo ne omogoča razumnega ravnotežja med zadevnimi interesi.
Specific rules should be laid down for special torts/delicts where the general rule does not allow a reasonable balance to be struck between the interests at stake.
V zvezi z odgovornostjo za izdelke naj bi predpis glede kolizije zakonov upošteval cilje pravične razdelitve tveganja, ki je del sodobne družbe z visoko razvito tehnologijo, varovanja zdravja potrošnikov, spodbujanja inovacij, zagotavljanja neizkrivljene konkurence in poenostavitve trgovine.
The conflict rule in matters of product liability should meet the objectives of fairly spreading the risks inherent in a modern high-technology society, protecting consumers' health, stimulating innovation, securing undistorted competition and facilitating trade.
Uravnotežena rešitev v zvezi s temi cilji je vzpostavitev kaskadnega sistema povezovanja dejavnikov skupaj s klavzulo predvidljivosti.
Creation of a cascade system of connecting factors, together with a foreseeability clause, is a balanced solution in regard to these objectives.
Prvi dejavnik, ki ga je treba upoštevati, je pravo države, v kateri je imela oseba, ki je utrpela škodo, v času nastale škode običajno prebivališče, če se je izdelek tržil v tej državi.
The first element to be taken into account is the law of the country in which the person sustaining the damage had his or her habitual residence when the damage occurred, if the product was marketed in that country.
Drugi elementi v kaskadnem sistemu se sprožijo, če se izdelek ni tržil v tej državi, brez poseganja v člen 4(2) in v možnost izrazito tesnejše povezave z drugo državo.
The other elements of the cascade are triggered if the product was not marketed in that country, without prejudice to Article 4(2) and to the possibility of a manifestly closer connection to another country.
trgovinske prakse
trade practices
bi moral predpis glede kolizije zakonov varovati konkurente, potrošnike in splošno javnost ter zagotavljati pravilno delovanje tržnega gospodarstva.
, the conflict rule should protect competitors, consumers and the general public and ensure that the market economy functions properly.
Povezava s pravom države, v kateri
The connection to the law of the country where
je trg prizadet
the market is, or is
Nepogodbene obveznosti, nastale zaradi omejevanja
The non-contractual obligations arising out of restrictions of
morale zajemati kršitve tako nacionalnega konkurenčnega prava kot konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti.
cover infringements of both national and Community competition law.
Koncept nepoštenih trgovinskih praks
For the purposes of this Regulation, the concept of unfair trade practices
prepoved sporazumov med podjetji, sklepi podjetniških združenj in usklajena ravnanja, ki bi lahko vplivali na trgovino med državami članicami in katerih cilj ali posledica je preprečevanje, omejevanje ali izkrivljanje konkurence v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu, kakor tudi prepoved zlorabe prevladujočega položaja v državi članici ali na notranjem trgu
prohibitions on agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade between Member States and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition within a Member State or within the internal market, as well as prohibitions on the abuse of a dominant position within a Member State or within the internal market
, v smislu členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe
, within the meaning of Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty
"Okoljska škoda" bi morala vključevati škodo, povzročeno zavarovanim vrstam in naravnim habitatom, škodo na vodah in škodo, povzročeno tlom, kot je to opredeljeno v členu 2 Direktive 2004/35/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o okoljski odgovornosti v zvezi s preprečevanjem in sanacijo okoljske škode
"Environmental damage" should cover damage to protected species and natural habitats, water damage and land damage as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage