natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj se zaveže, da bo izvedla obsežen pregled izvajanja direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES ter izdala obrazložitvene smernice za njuno izvajanje, da bi zagotovila celovito in pravilno izvajanje s strani držav članic; zlasti poziva Komisijo, naj presodi, kako posamezne države članice razlagajo izjeme iz členov 6 in 8 ob prenosu Direktive 2000/78/ES v nacionalno zakonodajo; opozarja, da izvajanje obeh direktiv zahteva vrsto mehanizmov in strategij, med drugim tudi skladnost, dejavno udejstvovanje in uveljavljanje ter učinkovito izmenjavo najboljše prakse;
Calls for a commitment by the Commission to carry out a substantial review of the implementation of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC as well as issuing interpretive guidelines for their implementation to ensure full and correct implementation by Member States; calls on the Commission, in particular, to assess the way in which Member States have interpreted the exemptions provided for in Articles 6 and 8 when transposing Directive 2000/78/EC into national law; recalls that the implementation of both Directives requires a range of mechanisms and strategies including compliance, proactive engagement and enforcement as well as effective exchanges of best practices;
poziva k učinkovitemu, sorazmernemu in odvračalnemu kaznovanju kršenja nacionalnih določb, sprejetih ob prenosu direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES;
Urges that sanctions applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive;
poziva Komisijo, naj pozorno spremlja prenos direktiv 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES ter skladnost z zakonodajo, ki izhaja iz njunega prenosa, in preko postopkov zaradi kršitev in neizvrševanja še naprej izvaja pritisk na države članice, da bi izpolnjevale svoje pravne obveznosti in direktivi čim prej v celoti prenesle; meni, da bi moral pristojni odbor Parlamenta sodelovati pri spremljanju obveznosti držav članic, izhajajočih iz teh direktiv;
Urges the Commission to monitor carefully the transposition of Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC as well as compliance with legislation resulting from their transposition, and to continue to put pressure on the Member States, by way of infringement and non-compliance procedures, to respect their legal obligations in fully transposing those Directives as soon as possible; believes that Parliament's competent Committee should play a role in the ongoing monitoring of Member States" obligations under those Directives;
opominja Komisijo, da člen 4 direktive 2000/78/ES dovoljuje izjeme le, kadar so iz objektivnih razlogov nujno potrebne za dobro izvajanje poklicne dejavnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj strogo omeji razlago tega člena in vloži tožbo pri Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti proti državam članicam, kadar v svoji nacionalni zakonodaji dopustijo preširoko opredelitev;
Reminds the Commission that Article 4 of Directive 2000/78/EC permits exceptions only to the extent that they are genuinely objectively necessary for the satisfactory performance of occupational activities; calls on the Commission to interpret that article strictly and to bring actions against Member States before the Court of Justice if they permit too broad a definition in their national legislation;
želi, da letna presoja izvajanja direktiv s strani držav članic postane del odprte metode usklajevanja in da se izvede obsežen pregled izvajanja te zakonodaje vsakih pet let kot del socialne agende; meni, da bi morali pri tej presoji sodelovati neodvisni organi, ki se ukvarjajo z vprašanji nediskriminacije, vključno z mrežo pravnih strokovnjakov, ki jo je organizirala Komisija, in nevladnimi organizacijami, ki zastopajo potencialne žrtve diskriminacije, in da je treba sprejeti konkretne ukrepe za izboljšanje zmogljivosti nevladnih organizacij, da bi zagotavljale informacije in pomoč žrtvam ter konstruktivno prispevale k letni presoji;
Asks for an annual evaluation of Member State implementation as part of the open method of coordination and an extended review of the implementation of such legislation every five years as part of the Social Agenda; believes that independent bodies concerned with non-discrimination issues, including the Commission's network of legal experts and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) representing potential victims of discrimination, should be involved in that annual evaluation and that concrete measures should be taken to build the capacity of NGOs in order to enable them to provide information and support to victims and to contribute constructively to the annual evaluation;
meni, da zaradi odsotnosti določbe o potrebni široki opredelitvi invalidnosti v Direktivi 2000/78/ES nekatere kategorije invalidov po tej direktivi nimajo pravnega varstva; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj se nemudoma dogovorijo o tej široki opredelitvi invalidnosti, da bi omogočile uskladitev s protidiskriminacijsko zakonodajo, ki bi lahko temeljila na Konvenciji o pravicah invalidov;
Believes that the absence of a provision in Directive 2000/78/EC indicating the necessity for broad definitions of disability has excluded some categories of disabled people from the legal protection of that Directive; therefore invites the Commission and the Member States to agree such broad definitions of disability urgently, in order to facilitate the harmonisation of anti-discrimination legislation, which could be based on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities;
meni, da so zaradi neopredeljenega roka za vložitev tožbe zaradi diskriminacije v nekaterih državah roki zelo kratki, kar je lahko ovira za sprožitev tožbe;
Believes that the lack of a provision establishing a time limit for bringing proceedings to challenge discrimination has led some Member States to set very short time limits, which might be an obstacle to bringing such proceedings;
meni, da so izjeme, povezane z zakonskim stanom v Direktivi 2000/78/ES, omejile zaščito pred diskriminacijo na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti, ki jo nudi ta direktiva;
Believes that exceptions linked to marital status in Directive 2000/78/EC has limited the protection against discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation offered by that Directive;
poziva države članice, naj učinkoviteje spodbujajo uporabo pravic državljanov EU v skladu z direktivama 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES ter poziva Komisijo, države članice, sindikate, delodajalce ter vladne in nevladne akterje, naj storijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, za boljšo seznanjenost s pravicami, izhajajočimi iz teh direktiv, ter naj žrtvam diskriminacije zagotovijo dostop do celovite odvetniške podpore, ki bi jim omogočila učinkovito uveljavljanje teh pravic; ugotavlja, da breme ukrepanja zoper izvajalca diskriminacije pogosto nosi žrtev, pogosto brez podpore javnih organov ter dostopa do pravne pomoči; poziva države članice, naj pooblastijo ustrezne neodvisne organe, da zagotavljajo učinkovito pomoč žrtvam diskriminacije;
Urges the Member States to promote more effectively the application of the rights of EU citizens under Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, and urges the Commission, the Member States, trade unions, employers, as well as governmental and non-governmental stakeholders to do all in their power to improve awareness of rights under those Directives and to ensure that victims of discrimination have access to a range of advocacy support to enable them effective to exercise their rights thereunder; notes that the burden is often on the victim to challenge the alleged perpetrator of the discrimination, frequently with neither support from any public authority nor access to legal aid; urges Member States to empower concerned independent bodies to provide effective help to victims of discrimination;
je zaskrbljen zaradi nizke stopnje osveščenosti glede protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje med državljani v državah članicah in poziva Komisijo, države članice, sindikate in delodajalce, naj okrepijo prizadevanja za njeno povečanje; opozarja, da direktive državam članicam nalagajo obvezo širjenja informacij v javnosti o ustreznih določbah teh direktiv z vsemi ustreznimi sredstvi;
Is concerned about the low level of awareness of anti-discrimination legislation among citizens in the Member States and calls on the Commission, the Member States, trade unions and employers to step up their efforts to raise that level of awareness; recalls that the Directives impose an obligation on Member States to disseminate information to the public on the relevant provisions of the Directives by all appropriate means;
državam članicam priporoča, da izvedejo neodvisno presojo ukrepov za preprečevanje in povračilnih protidiskriminacijskih ukrepov ter učinkovitosti zaščite pred viktimizacijo in zagotovijo ustrezno financiranje organov, ki sodelujejo pri preprečevanju diskriminacije in nudijo pomoč žrtvam, ne glede na to, ali je njihov status zakonsko predpisan; priporoča tudi, da Komisija v svoje spremljanje vključi medsebojne preglede;
Recommends that Member States undertake independent reviews of preventive and restitutive anti-discriminatory measures and the effectiveness of protection against victimisation and ensure that statutory and non-statutory bodies that participate in the prevention of discrimination and that support the victims of discrimination are adequately resourced; recommends also that the Commission include peer reviews in its ongoing monitoring exercise;
državam članicam priporoča, da ustrezno financirajo in pooblastijo neodvisne organe, ki spodbujajo enakost, da bi le-ti lahko učinkovito in neodvisno opravljali svojo vlogo, med drugim nudenje kakovostnega strokovnega znanja glede vseh vrst diskriminacije in primerne pomoči žrtvam diskriminacije; spodbuja države članice, naj zagotovijo, da delovanje teh organov zajema vse vrste diskriminacije, in poziva Komisijo, naj določi standarde za spremljanje in zagotavljanje njihove učinkovitosti in neodvisnosti;
Recommends that Member States adequately resource and empower independent bodies that promote equality so that they can perform their role effectively and independently, including providing sound expertise on all forms of discrimination and appropriate assistance for victims of discrimination; encourages the Member States to ensure that the remit of those bodies covers all forms of discrimination, and calls on the Commission to establish standards against which to monitor and ensure the effectiveness and independence of those bodies;
državam članicam in Komisiji priporoča, naj financirajo in pooblastijo tiste nevladne organizacije, ki zastopajo diskriminirane skupine, in tiste, ki delujejo na področju obveščanja državljanov in nudenja pravne pomoči v primerih diskriminacije;
Recommends that Member States and the Commission resource and empower those NGOs that represent discriminated groups, and those that are active in informing citizens and providing legal aid, as regards matters of discrimination;
poziva države članice, naj pri spremljanju pravilnega izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti sodelujejo s pristojnimi socialnimi partnerji;
Calls on the Member States to work together with the relevant social partners to monitor the correct implementation of Community legislation;
poudarja, da bi morale države članice v vsakem primeru zagotoviti avtomatično pravno pomoč žrtvam diskriminacije, če je potrebno s financiranjem preko državnih sistemov pravne pomoči;
Stresses that in any event Member States should ensure that victims of discrimination are automatically assisted in legal proceedings, if necessary by public funding through legal aid schemes;
poziva Komisijo, naj praktično in dejansko podpira sprejetje ukrepov v državah članicah prek programa Progress in Evropskega socialnega sklada, da bi podprla programe, ki si prizadevajo za enake možnosti in izkoreninjenje diskriminacije;
Calls upon the Commission practically and effectively to support the adoption of measures by Member States through the Progress programme and the European Social Fund in order to support programmes promoting equal opportunities and the eradication of discrimination;
priporoča, naj države članice za zagotavljanje učinkovitejše stopnje zaščite pooblastijo združenja, organizacije in druge pravne subjekte za sodelovanje v sodnih postopkih, tudi v imenu katere koli žrtve ali v njeno podporo;
Recommends that, in order to provide a more effective level of protection, Member States should empower associations, organisations and other legal entities to engage in legal proceedings, including on behalf or in support of any victim;
poziva vlade držav članic, naj zagotovijo enako obravnavanje in priložnosti v okviru politike zaposlovanja in socialne vključenosti ter naj zlasti obravnavajo resne prepreke, ki so v postopkih zaposlovanja nastale zaradi diskriminacije;
Urges the Member State governments to ensure equal treatment and opportunities under employment and social inclusion policies, and, in particular, to address the serious barriers raised by discrimination in recruitment procedures;
predlaga, naj države članice zagotovijo, da lahko združenja, organizacije in drugi pravni subjekti v imenu enega ali več pritožnikov sodelujejo v vseh sodnih postopkih za izvajanje direktiv;
Recommends that Member States ensure that associations, organisations and other legal entities may engage on behalf of one or more complainants in any judicial proceedings for the enforcement of the Directives;
poziva države članice, naj v sodelovanju z Agencijo EU za temeljne pravice in Komisijo redno zbirajo, združujejo in objavljajo celostne, točne, primerljive, zanesljive in ločene statistične podatke o diskriminaciji in jih objavijo tako, da bodo javnosti lahko razumljivi in bodo omogočali učinkovitejšo izmenjavo najboljše prakse; poudarja, da morajo biti za to na voljo zadostna sredstva in da je pomembno razvijati mehanizme za zbiranje podatkov o diskriminaciji v skladu z zakonodajo o varstvu podatkov;
Calls on the Member States, in cooperation with the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Commission, to collect, compile and publish comprehensive, accurate, comparable, reliable and separate statistics on discrimination at regular intervals and to publish them in such a way that they can be easily understood by the public and enable a more effective exchanges of best practices; stresses the need for the availability of sufficient funds to achieve this and the importance of developing ways of gathering data on discrimination in line with data protection legislation;
poziva k pripravi celovitih nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za odpravo vseh oblik diskriminacije;
Calls for the establishment of national integrated action plans against all forms of discrimination;
pozdravlja zanimanje Komisije za zbiranje podatkov o enakosti in objavo evropskega priročnika s temi podatki; poziva Komisijo, naj natančno preuči različna pravna vprašanja in parametre glede zbiranja podatkov ter poda predloge za boljše beleženje primerov diskriminacije in preuči skupne standarde za zbiranje podatkov; priporoča, da Komisija še naprej zagotavlja pravno usposabljanje za sodnike, odvetnike, sindikate in nevladne organizacije, da bi povečala dolgoročni učinek direktiv, pa tudi, da opravi več raziskav in analiz učinka predpisov za prenos direktiv;
Welcomes the Commission's interest in collecting equality data, including the publishing of the European handbook on such data; asks the Commission to study carefully the various legal questions and parameters regarding the issue of data collection and to put forward proposals to improve the recording of cases of discrimination and look at common standards for data collection; recommends that the Commission continue to provide legal training for judges, lawyers, trade unions and NGOs in order to enhance the long-term impact of the Directives, and also conduct more research and analysis of the impact of legislation transposing the Directives;
pozdravlja zanimanje Komisije za problematiko večvrstne diskriminacije, vključno z začetkom študije na to temo; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme uravnoteženo širšo opredelitev večvrstne diskriminacije ter preuči in priskrbi podatke o njej in o zločinih iz sovraštva; poziva jo tudi, naj vključi določbe, oblikovane posebej za boj proti večvrstni diskriminaciji, do katere lahko pride iz enega ali kombinacije več razlogov, v celotno prihodnjo zakonodajo, sprejeto v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe ES;
Welcomes the Commission's interest in multiple discrimination, including its launch of a study on this subject; calls on the Commission to adopt a balanced broad concept of multiple discrimination and for the Commission to examine and supply data on multiple discrimination and hate crimes; calls on the Commission to include provisions explicitly designed to combat multiple discrimination in any future legislation adopted under Article 13 of the EC Treaty, which can be invoked on either one or a combination of more than one of the grounds;
poudarja, kako pomembno je povezovanje v mreže med skupinami, ki delujejo na področju boja proti diskriminaciji na evropski, nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni;
Stresses the importance of networking between groups active in combating discrimination at European, national, regional and local level;
poziva države članice, naj revidirajo svojo nacionalno zakonodajo in razmislijo o razveljavitvi aktov, ki niso skladni s členom 13 Pogodbe ES;
Calls on Member States to review their national legislation and consider repealing acts that are incompatible with Article 13 of the EC Treaty;
meni, da je Direktiva 2000/43/ES temelj za oblikovanje celostnega protidiskriminacijskega okvira za ukrepe, povezane s prepovedjo diskriminacije zaradi rase in narodnosti; vendar poudarja, da je treba upoštevati že ugotovljene vprašljive vidike in težave, s katerimi se srečujejo države članice pri dejanskem prenosu ter izvajanju določb te direktive;
Regards Directive 2000/43/EC as the foundation upon which to base a comprehensive anti-discrimination framework for measures relating to the prohibition against discrimination on the basis of race or ethnic origin; stresses, however, that account must be taken of problematic aspects which have already been identified and of the difficulties encountered by Member States in effectively transposing and implementing the provisions of that Directive;
poudarja, da mora Komisija oblikovati skupno stališče EU glede pomena pozitivnih ukrepov ali si mora vsaj prizadevati za soglasje o njih, s čimer bi prekinila mite o njihovem pomenu in izvajanju v nekaterih državah članicah, zlasti glede njihove učinkovitosti v boju proti diskriminaciji in vzpostavljanju enakosti rezultatov v nekaterih državah članicah;
Stresses that the Commission must produce a common, EU-wide definition of, or at least work towards a consensus about, the meaning of positive action, thereby dispelling the myths surrounding its meaning and its application in some Member States, particularly given its effectiveness for successfully tackling discrimination and producing equality of outcomes in some Member States;
ugotavlja, da bi lahko sedaj Komisija predlagala le zakonodajo za prepoved diskriminacije pri dostopu do blaga in storitev na nekaterih področjih, ne pa vseh; opominja Komisijo na njeno zavezo, da bo predlagala celovito direktivo, ki bo zajemala diskriminacijo zaradi invalidnosti, starosti, vere ali prepričanja in spolne usmerjenosti, da se dopolni paket protidiskriminacijske zakonodaje v skladu s členom 13 Pogodbe ES, kot je določeno v njenem delovnem programu za leto 2008; ponovno poudarja politično, socialno in pravno zaželenost odprave hierarhije varstva pred diskriminacijo iz različnih vzrokov; je trdno prepričan, da nima smisla prepovedati diskriminacijo na enem področju, hkrati pa jo dovoljevati na drugem;
Notes that the Commission may intend now to put forward only legislation to outlaw discrimination in access to goods and services on some, but not all grounds; reminds the Commission of its commitment to put forward a comprehensive directive covering disability, age, religion or belief and sexual orientation to complete the package of anti-discrimination legislation under Article 13 of the EC Treaty as provided in its 2008 work programme; reiterates the political, social and legal desirability of putting an end to the hierarchy of protection against the different grounds of discrimination; strongly believes that it does not make sense to prohibit discrimination in one area while allowing it in another;
z zanimanjem pričakuje razvoj opredelitve invalidnosti s strani Skupnosti, ki bo invalidom iz vse Evropske unije omogočila uživanje enakih pravic, ne glede na to, v katerem njenem delu bivajo;
Awaits with interest the development of the Community definition of disability which will allow disabled people from all over the European Union to enjoy the same rights wherever they are situated within the European Union;
meni, da bo morala nova predlagana direktiva o boju proti diskriminaciji na podlagi člena 13 Pogodbe ES prepovedati vse oblike diskriminacije, neposredne in posredne, na vseh področjih, že zajetih v direktivah 2000/43/ES in 2000/78/ES, diskriminacijo preko združenj in diskriminacijo na podlagi zaznane pripadnosti zaščiteni skupini ter nadlegovanje; meni, da bi morala navodila o diskriminaciji veljati za diskriminacijo in da se kot diskriminacija šteje tudi neupravičena nezmožnost zagotovitve primernega bivališča; meni, da bi morale direktive jasno pokazati, da ne obstaja hierarhija med različnimi razlogi za diskriminacijo in da se je proti vsem njenim oblikam treba boriti z enako ostrimi ukrepi; vztraja, da mora vsak nov predlog zakonodaje ustrezno odražati vse posebnosti različnih razlogov diskriminacije;
Believes that any new proposed directive designed to combat discrimination as referred to in Article 13 of the EC Treaty will have to prohibit all forms of discrimination, including direct and indirect discrimination, in all areas already covered by Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC, discrimination by association, discrimination linked to perceived membership of a protected group and harassment; believes that an instruction to discriminate should be deemed to constitute discrimination, and that an unjustified failure to make a reasonable accommodation should be regarded as a form of discrimination; believes that the Directives should make clear that there is no hierarchy between the different forms of discrimination and that they must all be combated in equally strong measure; insists that any new proposed legislation duly reflects all the specificities of the different respective grounds;