natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Uporaba navedene baze podatkov med državljani Unije se dejavno spodbuja.
That database shall be actively promoted to EU citizens.
doda se četrti pododstavek:
A fourth subparagraph is added:
Informacije, ki jih predložijo imetniki dovoljenja za dajanje v promet in jih odobrijo nacionalni organi, navedeni organi pošljejo Agenciji ter se vključijo v bazo podatkov iz prvega pododstavka, ki je dostopna javnosti.
The information submitted by marketing authorisation holders and approved by the national authorities shall be sent to the Agency by those authorities and included in the database referred to in the first subparagraph, which shall be available to the public.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. novembra 2010 o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 November 2010 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast) ( COM(2008)0809 – C6-0471/2008 – 2008/0240(COD) )
(Redni zakonodajni postopek: prva obravnava - prenovitev)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading - recast)
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0809 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0809 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0471/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0471/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu z naslovom Posledice začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe za še nedokončane medinstitucionalne postopke odločanja ( KOM(2009)0665 ),
having regard to the Commission communication to Parliament and the Council entitled: ‘Consequences of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon for ongoing interinstitutional decision-making procedures’ ( COM(2009)0665 ),
ob upoštevanju mnenja Ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 10 junija 2009 UL C 306, 16.12.2009, str.
having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 10 June 2009 OJ C 306, 16.12.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 4. decembra 2009 UL C 141, 29.5.2010, str.
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 4 December 2009 OJ C 141, 29.5.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju pisma z dne 11. novembra 2009 Odbora za pravne zadeve Odboru za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane, v skladu s členom 87(3) Poslovnika,
having regard to the letter of 11 November 2009 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety in accordance with Rule 87(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0196/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0196/2010 ),
ker po mnenju posvetovalne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije predlog ne vsebuje bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem opredeljene kot take, in ker je, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih aktov skupaj z omenjenimi spremembami, predlog zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb,
whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance,
sprejme v nadaljevanju podano mnenje iz prve obravnave, ob upoštevanju priporočil posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije;
Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out, taking into account the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
odobri svojo izjavo, priloženo tej resoluciji;
Approves its statement annexed to this resolution;
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Direktivi 2011/65/EU.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position corresponds to the final legislative act, Directive 2011/65/EU).
Izvaja Evropskega parlamenta
Statement by the European Parliament
Evropski parlament obžaluje, da Svet ni bil pripravljen sprejeti obvezno objavo korelacijskih tabel v okviru prenove Direktive 2002/95/ES.
The European Parliament regrets that the Council was not prepared to accept the mandatory publication of correlation tables in the context of the recast of Directive 2002/95/EC.
Da bi zagotovili horizontalno in medinstitucionalno rešitev tega vprašanja, Evropski parlament poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj šest mesecev po sprejetju tega sporazuma na plenarnem zasedanju poroča o praksi držav članic glede priprave korelacijskih tabel na področju okoljske zakonodaje EU in objave teh tabel, vključno z oceno, kako sedanja praksa vpliva na vlogo Komisije kot varuha Pogodbe pri nadzorovanju pravilnega prenosa direktive EU v nacionalno zakonodajo na področju varstva okolja.
With a view to advancing a horizontal and inter-institutional solution of this matter, the European Parliament calls on the European Commission to make a report within six months after adoption of this agreement in plenary on the practice of Member States to draw up correlation tables in the field of EU environmental legislation and to make them public, including an assessment of how current practice affects the Commission's role of ‘guardian of the Treaty’ in controlling correct transposition of EU directives into national legislation in the field of environment protection.
Izjava Komisije o področju uporabe (člen2(2))
Commission statement on the scope (Article 2(2))
Električna in elektronska oprema, ki ne spada v področje uporabe Direktive 2002/95/ES, vendar bi bila zajeta v novi direktivi, med drugim vključuje električno in elektronsko opremo, zajeto v:
EEE which was outside of the scope of Directive 2002/95/EC, but which would be covered by the new Directive, includes amongst others EEE covered by:
novo kategorijo 11 v Prilogi I;
the new category 11 in Annex I;
novo opredelitev izraza „odvisna“ iz člena 3(2);
the new definition of ‘dependent’ of Article 3(2);
'kable' iz člena 4 in povezane z opredelitvijo iz člena 3(5);
‘cables’ mentioned in article 4 and the related definition in Article 3(5);
dvokolesna vozila, ki niso homologirana (člen 2(4)(f)).
two-wheel vehicles which are not type-approved (Article 2(4)(f)).
Med osemletnim prehodnim obdobjem v skladu z razlago Komisije iz člena 2(2) izhaja, da morajo države članice za električno in elektronsko opremo, ki je bila zunaj področja uporabe Direktive 2002/95/ES, vendar bi bila zajeta v novi direktivi, dovoliti, da je še naprej na voljo na njihovih trgih.
During the transitional period of eight years, in the Commission's interpretation, it follows from Article 2(2) that Member States are obliged to allow electrical and electronic equipment that was outside the scope of Directive 2002/95/EC, but which would be covered by the new Directive, to continue to be made available on their market.
Izjava Komisije o pregledu (člen 24)
Commission statement on the review (Article 24)
Ta pregled, ki mu sledi poročilo Sveta in Evropskega parlamenta, lahko spremlja zakonodajni predlog, če se Komisiji to zdi primerno.
This review, followed by a report to the Council and the European Parliament, may be accompanied by a legislative proposal, if the Commission deems appropriate.
Obseg pregleda in zakonodajnega predloga bo določila Komisija v skladu z njeno pravico do zakonodajne pobude v skladu s pogodbami.
The extent of the review and of the legislative proposal remains to be determined by the Commission in accordance with its right of legislative initiative, in line with the Treaties.
Izjava Komisije o nanomaterialih (uvodna izjava 16 in člen 6)
Commission statement on nano-materials (recital 16 and Article 6)
Komisija ugotavlja, da so prizadevanja za enotno opredelitev nanomaterialov še vedno v teku in namerava v bližnji prihodnosti sprejeti priporočilo Komisije o enotni opredelitvi za vsa zakonodajna področja.
The Commission notes that work towards a common definition on nanomaterials is still on-going and intends to adopt a Commission Recommendation on a common definition for all legislative sectors in the near future.
Komisija meni, da določbe o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi (RoHS) zajemajo različne oblike (vključno z nanooblikami) snovi, ki so trenutno prepovedane, in tiste, ki bodo v prihodnosti predmet prednostnega pregleda v okviru RoHS.
The Commission considers that the RoHS provisions cover different forms (including nanoforms) of the substances which are currently banned and those which will be in the future subject to a priority review under RoHS.
Izjava Komisije o korelacijskih tabelah
Commission statement on correlation tables
Komisija znova poudarja svojo zavezo k zagotovitvi, da države članice oblikujejo korelacijske tabele, ki sprejete ukrepe prenosa povezujejo z direktivo EU, in jih sporočijo Komisiji v okviru prenosa zakonodaje EU; to sodi v željo po zaščiti interesa državljanov, boljši pripravi zakonodaje in povečanju pravne transparentnosti ter podpori pregleda skladnosti nacionalne zakonodaje z določbami EU.
The Commissions recalls its commitment towards ensuring that Member States establish correlation tables linking the transposition measures they adopt with the EU directive and communicate them to the Commission in the framework of transposing EU legislation, in the interest of citizens, better-law making and increasing legal transparency and to assist the examination of the conformity of national rules with EU provisions.
Komisija obžaluje pomanjkanje podpore za določbe, ki so vključene v predlog Komisije iz leta 2008 za Direktivo o omejevanju uporabe nekaterih nevarnih snovi v električni in elektronski opremi (prenova), s katero bi bilo oblikovanje korelacijskih tabel obvezno.
The Commission regrets the lack of support for the provision included in the 2008 Commission proposal on the Directive on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (recast), which aimed at rendering the establishment of correlation tables obligatory.
Komisija lahko v duhu iskanja kompromisa in za zagotovitev takojšnjega sprejetja predloga privoli, da se v besedilu obvezna določba o korelacijskih tabelah nadomesti s primerno uvodno izjavo, ki države članice spodbuja k takšni praksi.
The Commission, in a spirit of compromise and in order to ensure the immediate adoption of that proposal, can accept the substitution of the obligatory provision on correlation tables included in the text with a relevant recital encouraging Member States to follow this practice.
Vendar pa stališče Komisije v tem dokumentu ne sme veljati za precedens.
However, the position followed by the Commission in this file shall not be considered as a precedent.
ob upoštevanju členov 207 in 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to having regard to Articles 207 and 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the transparency and state of play of the ACTA [Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement] negotiations,
ob upoštevanju svojega sklepa z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o reviziji okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Evropsko komisijo,
having regard to its decision of 20 October 2010 on the revision of the framework agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission,
ob upoštevanju razprave na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
having regard to the plenary debate of 20 October 2010 on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
ob upoštevanju osnutka trgovinskega sporazuma za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA) z dne 2. oktobra 2010,
having regard to the 2 October 2010 draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement,
ob upoštevanju odločbe Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic o pritožbi št. 90/2009(JD)OV glede dostopa do dokumentov v zvezi s sporazumom ACTA,
having regard to the European Ombudsman's decision on complaint 90/2009/(JD)OV relating to access to ACTA documents,
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1383/2003,
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003,
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljši pripravi zakonodaje med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo (2003/C 321/01),
having regard to the Inter-Institutional Agreement on Better Law-Making between Parliament, the Council and the Commission (2003/C 321/01),
ob upoštevanju sporazuma Svetovne trgovinske organizacije o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS),
having regard to the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS),
ker je boj proti ponarejanju bistven del politične strategije EU za zagotavljanje pravice, enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vse proizvajalce, ohranjanje zaposlitev državljanov in spoštovanje pravne države,
whereas the fight against counterfeiting represents a key element in the EU political strategy with a view to ensuring justice, a level playing field for our producers, the maintenance of employment for citizens and respect for the rule of law,
ker je za učinkovitejši boj proti ponarejanju, ki je svetovni pojav, potrebno mednarodno sodelovanje največjih svetovnih akterjev,
whereas, in order to be more effective, the fight against counterfeiting – which is a worldwide phenomenon – requires stronger international cooperation among the major world players,
ker kljub številnim poskusom, da bi dosegli mnogostranski pristop, ki je še vedno glavni cilj strategije EU, to še vedno ni uspelo zaradi odpora in nasprotovanja svetovnih akterjev in ker se zato zdi, da je večstranski sporazum najboljši način za obravnavo posebnih vprašanj na mednarodni ravni,
whereas, despite several attempts to achieve a multilateral approach – which remains the main goal in the EU strategy – this could not be pursued because of resistance and opposition from other global players, and whereas the plurilateral agreement therefore seems to be the best way of addressing specific concerns at an international level,
ker sporazum ACTA presega področje uporabe sporazuma TRIPS pri številnih temah, tudi pri določbah za digitalni sektor in na področju uporabe obveznih obmejnih ukrepov, zato lahko lastnikom pravic ponudi boljšo zaščito,
whereas, in many areas, including provisions for the digital sector and the scope of compulsory border measures, ACTA goes beyond the scope of TRIPS and therefore affords right-holders better protection,
ker se je preglednost pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA po ostrem protestu Parlamenta bistveno izboljšala in je Parlament od kroga pogajanja v Novi Zelandiji dobival popolno poročilo o poteku pogajanj; ker se je seznanil s besedilom, doseženim s pogajanji, en teden po zaključku zadnjega kroga na Japonskem,
whereas, after strong representations by Parliament, the level of transparency of the ACTA negotiations was fundamentally improved and, since the negotiating round in New Zealand, Parliament has been fully informed of the course of the negotiations; and whereas it took cognisance of the negotiated text one week after the conclusion of the last round in Japan,
ker so iz besedila, doseženega s pogajanji, razvidni pomisleki Parlamenta iz preteklih mesecev, tudi glede vprašanj, kot so spoštovanje temeljnih pravic, zasebnosti in varovanja podatkov, spoštovanje pomembne vloge svobodnega svetovnega spleta, pomen zaščite vloge ponudnikov storitev in potreba po zaščiti dostopa do zdravil (sklicevanje na Deklaracijo iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, sprejete 14. novembra 2001 in vključene v preambulo sporazuma),
whereas the negotiated text reflects the main concerns expressed by Parliament over recent months, including on issues such as the observance of fundamental rights, privacy and data protection, respect for the important role of free Internet, the importance of safeguarding the role of service providers, and the need to safeguard access to medicines – a reference to the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on 14 November 2001, having been incorporated into the preamble to the agreement,
ker je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da je treba izvajati zaščito geografskih oznak; ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA dogovorile, da bodo geografske oznake uveljavljale,
whereas the Commission has repeatedly affirmed the importance of enforcing the protection of geographical indications (GIs); whereas it has been agreed by parties to the agreement that ACTA will provide for the enforcement of GIs,
ker je bistveno zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine razvijejo na takšen način, da ne bodo ovirali inovacij ali konkurence, ogrožali omejitev v zvezi s pravicami intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, omejevali prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjevali zakonitega trgovanja,
whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade,
ker bo moral Parlament zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe decembra 2009 dati privolitev za besedilo sporazuma ACTA, preden sporazum začne veljati v Evropski uniji,
whereas, as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty in December 2009, Parliament will have to give consent to the ACTA text prior to the agreement's entry into force in the EU,
pozdravlja objavo osnutka sporazuma za boj proti ponarejanju 2. oktobra 2010 po pogajanjih v Tokiu in pričakuje, da bo Komisija Parlamentu in javnosti predstavila dokončno besedilo ACTA po sestanku za tehnična pogajanja, ki bo v Sidneyu od 30. novembra do 3. decembra 2010;
Welcomes the release of the 2 October 2010 draft of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement following the Tokyo negotiating round and expects the Commission to release to Parliament and the public the finalised ACTA text following the technical negotiation meeting in Sydney from 30 November to 3 December 2010;
ponovno poudarja, da je boj proti ponarejanju prednostna naloga njene notranje in mednarodne politične strategije in da je mednarodno sodelovanje ključno za dosego tega cilja;
Reiterates that combating counterfeiting is a priority in its internal and international political strategy and that international cooperation is a key issue in the attainment of this goal;
se v celoti zaveda, da s pogajanji dosežen sporazum ne bo rešil zapletenega in večdimenzionalnega problema ponarejanja; vendar meni, da je korak v pravo smer;
Is fully aware that the agreement negotiated will not solve the complex and multi-dimensional problem of counterfeiting; considers, however, that it is a step in the right direction;
pozdravlja trditev iz preambule osnutka posvetovalnega besedila z dne 2. oktobra 2010, da je cilj sporazuma ACTA, da omogoči učinkovita in ustrezna sredstva za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine, pri čemer dopolnjuje sporazum TRIPS in upošteva razlike v posameznih pravnih sistemih in praksah podpisnic sporazuma ACTA; vztraja na načelih iz Deklaracije iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, ki jo je STO sprejela 14. novembra 2001 na svoji četrti ministrski konferenci v Dohi (Katar), ki so temelji osnutka posvetovalnega besedila sporazuma ACTA z dne 2. oktobra 2010 in jih zato mora vsako izvajanje sporazuma ACTA upoštevati;
Welcomes the fact that the deliberative draft text of 2 October 2010 confirms, in its preamble, ACTA's aim of providing effective and appropriate means of IPR enforcement, complementing the TRIPS agreement and taking into account differences in the respective legal systems and practices of the ACTA parties; and insists on the fact that the principles set out in the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on 14 November 2001 by the WTO at its Fourth Ministerial Conference, held in Doha, Qatar, are the building blocks underpinning the ACTA deliberative draft text of 2 October 2010 and that, therefore, any enforcement of ACTA should comply with these principles;
meni, da je sporazum ACTA orodje za izboljšanje učinkovitosti obstoječih standardov, kar bo zaščitilo izvoz EU in lastnike pravic na svetovnem trgu, na katerem so trenutno deležni sistematičnega kršenja avtorskih pravic, blagovnih znamk, patentov, oblikovanja in geografskih označb;
Considers ACTA as a tool for making the existing standards more effective, thus benefiting EU exports and protecting right-holders when they operate in the global market, where they currently suffer systematic and widespread infringement of their copyrights, trademarks, patents, designs and GIs;
poudarja, da je za evropska podjetja in za zaposlovanje v EU pomembno, da se geografske označbe varujejo; je seznanjen s prizadevanji Komisije, da bi vključila zaščito geografskih oznak v področje uporabe sporazuma ACTA;
Stresses the importance, for European companies and employment in the EU, of protecting GIs; acknowledges the efforts made by the Commission to include the protection of GIs within the scope of ACTA;
izraža obžalovanje, ker sporazum v svojem členu 1.X ne opredeljuje ponarejanja geografskih označb, kar bi lahko povzročilo zmedo ali vsaj zapletlo naloge upravnih in sodnih organov pri obrazložitvi in izvajanju sporazuma ACTA;
Finds it regrettable that, in its Article 1.X, the agreement does not define ‘counterfeit geographical indications’, as this omission could create confusion or at least complicate the tasks of administrative and judicial authorities in the interpretation and enforcement of ACTA;
pozdravlja vključitev besede „lahko“ v člen 2.14.3 (Vsaka stranka lahko predpiše kazenske postopke in kazni...);
Welcomes the inclusion of the word ‘may’ in Article 2.14.3 (‘Each party may provide criminal procedures and penalties [...]’);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so se strani po vztrajanju EU sporazumele, da je lahko kriminalizacija snemanja s kamero neobvezna (člena 2.14.3 in 2.15);
Welcomes the fact that the parties agreed, following EU insistence, that the criminalisation of ‘camcording’ should be merely optional (Articles 2.14.3 and 2.15);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da članstvo v sporazumu ACTA ni ekskluzivno in da se mu lahko pridružijo tudi države v razvoju in države v vzponu, s čimer se bo spodbujala širitev zaščite pravic intelektualne lastnine in okrepil boj proti ponarejanju po vsem svetu; meni, da bi sporazum ACTA v prihodnje lahko dosegel večstransko raven;
Welcomes the fact that ACTA membership is not exclusive and that additional developing and emerging countries may join, thus promoting widespread IPR protection and enhancing the fight against counterfeiting worldwide; considers that, in the future, ACTA could potentially attain a multilateral level;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da izvajanje sporazuma ACTA ne bo vplivalo na temeljne pravice in varstvo podatkov, na sedanja prizadevanja EU, da bi poenotila izvedbene ukrepe za pravice intelektualne lastnine, ter na elektronsko poslovanje;
Calls on the Commission to confirm that ACTA's implementation will have no impact on fundamental rights and data protection, on the ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures, or on e-commerce;