natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
močno priporoča, da se povečajo sredstev za instrumente, kot so STREP (ciljni raziskovalni projekti), kooperativno raziskovanje (prej CRAFT) in kolektivno raziskovanje, namenjene zlasti malim in srednje velikim podjetjem in za njihovo dostopnost, da so merila za vključitev projektov bolj prilagodljiva, projektom pa se omogoči večja in pravičnejša možnostjo za uspeh; spodbuja države članice k sprejetju fiskalnih in drugih pobud za pospeševanje industrijske inovativnosti, skupaj s povezavami z EUREKO, zlasti v zvezi z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji; priporoča dodelitev subvencij malim in srednje velikim podjetjem za pridobivanje licenc patentov; poziva Komisijo, da preuči možnost dodelitve deleža vsakega tematskega proračuna za določen znesek podpore mikro in malim podjetjem kot naložbo z majhnim tveganjem, za katero velja poenostavljen izbirni postopek in minimalno upravljanje;
Strongly recommends that resources for instruments such as STREP (specific targeted research projects) and cooperative research (formerly CRAFT) and collective research expressly addressed to SMEs, as well as their accessibility, should be increased, the criteria for the admission of projects rendered more flexible, and projects given a greater and fairer chance of success; encourages Member States to adopt fiscal and other incentives for promoting industrial innovation, including links with EUREKA, especially with reference to SMEs; recommends the provision of subsidies to SMEs for obtaining patent licences; calls on the Commission to consider allocating a proportion of each thematic budget for fixed-sum grants to micro- and small enterprises as seedcorn risk investment subject to simplified streamlined selection processes and minimal administration thereafter;
poziva Komisijo, da podpre razvoj tehničnih platform in "socialno podprtih raziskovalnih platform" za razvoj socialno podprtih raziskovalnih konzorcijev okoli velikih izzivov na socialnem področju v Evropi, tj. skupnih demografskih sprememb v Evropi in izzivov na področju okolja;
Calls on the Commission to support the development of technology platforms and "socially motivated research platforms" to develop socially motivated research consortia around major challenges in the societal sphere in Europe, i.e. common demographic changes in Europe and challenges in the environmental field;
podpira usmerjanje uradništva v tem programu, zlasti v povezavi z malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji;
Supports the streamlining of bureaucracy in this programme, particularly in relation to SMEs;
v interesu spodbujanja inovacij poziva k vnaprej določenemu, bistvenemu deležu sredstev za "skupne raziskave", ki sestavljajo najpomembnejši del sedmega okvirnega programa, z namenom sodelovanja med malimi in srednje velikimi podjetji in raziskovalnimi ustanovami;
Calls, in the interest of promoting innovation, for a pre-determined, substantial proportion of the funds for "collaborative research", which makes up the most important part of FP7, to be reserved for cooperation between SMEs and research institutions;
poziva evropske institucije in države članice, tudi z vključitvijo lokalnih in regionalnih oblasti ter drugih primernih institucij, k vzpostavitvi regionalnih tehnoloških inkubatorjev ter preko javnih finančnih instrumentov (EIB, strukturni skladi, regionalni skladi) k spodbujanju uporabe zasebnega rizičnega kapitala (učinek finančnega vzvoda) za ustanavljanje regionalnih skladov rizičnega kapitala (predvsem skladov tveganega kapitala), ki so, glede na to, da so kot javno-zasebni skladi upravljani ob tesnem sodelovanju s tehnološkimi inkubatorji, pomemben predpogoj za učinkovito financiranje novih projektov visoke tehnologije, ki si jih zamislijo novi podjetniki;
Calls on the European institutions and Member States to promote, including with the involvement of local and regional authorities and other appropriate institutions, the establishment of regional technology incubators and, by means of their public financial instruments (EIF, Structural Funds, regional funds), to encourage the use of private risk capital (leverage effect) for the purpose of establishing regional risk capital funds (primarily venture-capital funds), which - as public-private risk funds operated in close cooperation with technology incubators - are an essential prerequisite for the effective financing of new high-technology projects devised by start-up entrepreneurs;
poziva Komisijo, da nameni posebno pozornost položaju industrijskih raziskav, ker te raziskave utemeljujejo velik del vseh sredstev, porabljenih za raziskave;
Calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the situation of industrial research, because this research accounts for a large proportion of the total resources spent on research;
poziva Komisijo, da predlaga določbe o vzpostavitvi sistema za hitro odčitavanje za mala in srednje velika podjetja, ki bi jim omogočil hitro oceno verjetnosti financiranja raziskovalnih projektov;
Calls on the Commission to come forward with provisions on establishing a quick scanning system for SMEs which would enable them to rapidly assess the probability of funding for research projects;
močno priporoča, da mora okvirni program spodbujati oblikovanje znanstvenih skupin in regionalnih omrežij z udeležbo malih in srednje velikih podjetij in podpirati obstoječe pobude v državah članicah;
Strongly recommends that the FP should promote the formation of scientific clusters and regional networks, with the involvement of SMEs, and should support existing initiatives in the Member States;
meni, da je treba določiti učinkovitejšo in bolj usklajeno uporabo drugih mehanizmov financiranja in podpornih mehanizmov (EIB, strukturni skladi, javni nacionalni in zasebni skladi ter EUREKA) za spodbujanje raziskav in razvoja ter inovacij; zato predlaga, da države članice v sodelovanju z regijami ustvarijo povezave med nacionalnimi izvedbenimi programi za cilj 2 strukturne politike in projekti, v zvezi s katerimi je zaprošeno za financiranje v okviru okvirnega programa;
Firmly believes that there should be made a more efficient and coordinated use of other funding mechanisms and support mechanisms (EIB, Structural Funds, national public and private funds and EUREKA) to support R&D and innovation; therefore recommends that Member States, in cooperation with the regions, create a link between national operational programmes for Objective 2 of the Structural Policy and projects applying for funds from the FP;
poziva Komisijo, da pri predstavitvi sedmega okvirnega programa objasni pojem evropske dodane vrednosti ter zlasti nakaže področja raziskav, katerih cilji bi morali biti jasni vsem v državah članicah in ki so lahko doseženi predvsem preko skupnih evropskih projektov;
Calls on the Commission, in submitting FP7, to clarify the concept of European Added Value, and in particular to provide for research fields whose objectives - which should be evident to people in all Member States - can be achieved preferably through joint European projects;
strinja se s krepitvijo sodelovanja med nacionalnimi raziskovalnimi programi; poziva Komisijo, da prevzame pobude v skladu s členom 169 Pogodbe ES;
Advocates enhanced cooperation between national research programmes; calls on the Commission to take initiatives pursuant to Article 169 of the EC Treaty;
poziva Komisijo, da sklene dogovore z industrijo in tako spodbudi raziskave na strateških področjih;
Calls on the Commission to conclude agreements with industry so as to stimulate research in strategic areas;
meni, da mora opredelitev tematskih prednostnih nalog sedmega okvirnega programa, ki bo vključena v sklep Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o sedmem okvirnem programu, odražati strateške prednostne naloge Lizbonske strategije; biti mora tudi rezultat aktivne razprave med evropskimi, nacionalnimi in regionalnimi institucijami, znanstveno skupnostjo in interesne skupine civilne družbe, vključno s poslovnim sektorjem;
Believes that the definition of thematic priorities, to be included in the forthcoming decision of the European Parliament and the Council on FP7, should reflect the strategic priorities of the Lisbon agenda; moreover, it should be the result of an active debate among European, national and regional institutions, the scientific community and civil society stakeholders including the business sector;
znanosti o življenju (vključno z biotehnologijo, nevrologijo, preventivno medicino in javnim zdravjem),
life sciences (including biotechnology, neuroscience and preventive and public health),
vseh obstoječih in prihodnjih energetskih virov brez emisij CO2 (zlasti obnovljivih virov energije in učinkovite izrabe energije),
all existing and future non-CO2-emitting energy sources (particularly renewable energy and energy efficiency),
verjame, da je za spopadanje z vedno večjimi okoljskimi nevarnostmi po svetu nepogrešljivo, da evropska raziskovalna politika aktivnejše podpira raziskave in razvoj na področju naravnih nesreč;
Believes that, in order to cope with the growing worldwide environmental dangers, it is essential that European research policy strongly promotes R&D in the field of natural hazards;
meni, da bi morala EU zagotoviti financiranje trenutno premalo financiranih raziskav o boleznih, ki vplivajo na državljane držav v razvoju;
Considers that the EU should ensure financing of currently underfunded research on illnesses that affect citizens of developing countries;
meni, da mora sedmi okvirni program podpirati raziskave in razvoj tudi na izredno inovativnih področjih znanstvenih disciplin in gospodarskih sektorjev, ki počasneje rastejo;
Considers that FP7 should also support R&D in highly innovative areas of slower-growing scientific disciplines and economic sectors;
poudarja potrebo, da Evropska unija sprejme posebne ukrepe in tako znanost približa državljanu, na primer z začenjanjem javnih razprav o pomembnih znanstvenih in tehnoloških vprašanjih, kar se mora odražati v evropski razvojni politiki in v prihodnjem okvirnem programu;
Stresses the need for the European Union to take specific actions to bring science closer to the citizen, for example by opening public debates on important scientific and technological issues, which should be reflected in European research policy and in the forthcoming FP;
poziva Komisijo, da izkaže ustrezno skrb za zaščito živali, najprej s podpiranjem alternativ za poskuse na živalih in nato z zmanjševanjem števila poskusov na živalih na najnižjo možno raven pri projektih, ki jih financira;
Calls on the Commission to show a proper concern for animal protection firstly by supporting alternatives to animal testing and secondly by reducing to a minimum the number of animal tests in the projects it finances;
meni, da je treba več pozornosti v okvirnem programu nameniti interdisciplinarnim raziskavam ter tako zagotoviti nove spodbude in zasnove idej;
Considers that greater consideration should be given in the FP to inter-disciplinary research, in order to provide new impulses and lines of thought;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic in držav kandidatk.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, as well as to the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States and candidate countries.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu – financiranje Nature 2000 ( KOM(2004)0431 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament - Financing Natura 2000 ( COM(2004)0431 ),
ob upoštevanju Konvencije o biotski raznovrstnosti,
having regard to the Convention on Biological Diversity,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
having regard to Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
("direktiva o pticah"),
("the Birds Directive"),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 1998 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o strategiji Evropske skupnosti za biotsko raznovrstnost UL C 341, 9.11.1998, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 October 1998 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on a European Community biodiversity strategy OJ C 341, 9.11.1998, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2001 o izvajanju Direktive 92/43/EGS o habitatih UL C 262, 18.9.2001, str.
having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2001 on implementation of Directive 92/43/EEC on habitats OJ C 262, 18.9.2001, p.
ob upoštevanju Sklepa št. 1600/2002/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 22. julija 2002 o šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti UL L 242, 10.9.2002, str.
having regard to the Decision No 1600/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 laying down the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme OJ L 242, 10.9.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. marca 2002 o sporočilu Komisije Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o akcijskih načrtih biotske raznovrstnosti na območjih ohranjanja naravnih virov, kmetijstva in ribištva ter razvojnem in gospodarskem sodelovanju UL C 47 E, 27.2.2003, str.
having regard to its resolution of 14 March 2002 on the communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the biodiversity action plans in the areas of conservation of natural resources, agriculture, fisheries, and development and economic cooperation OJ C 47 E, 27.2.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenj Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja in Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0049/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0049/2005 ),
ker so se na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Gothenburgu junija 2001 Sklepi predsedstva na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Gothenburgu z dne 15. in 16. junija 2001.
whereas at the European Council meeting in Gothenburg in June 2001 Presidency Conclusions of the Gothenburg European Council 15 and 16 June 2001.
voditelji držav in vlad zavezali, da bodo zaustavili izgubo biotske raznovrstnosti v Evropski uniji do leta 2010,
, European Heads of State and Government made a commitment to reverse the decline of biodiversity in the European Union by the year 2010,
ker šesti okoljski akcijski program za cilj določa zaščito in kjer je to potrebno obnovo strukture in financiranja naravnih sistemov in zaustavitev izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010 v Evropski uniji in po svetu,
whereas the Sixth Community Environment Action Programme specifies the objective to protect and where necessary restore the structure and funding of natural systems and halt the loss of biodiversity, both in the European Union and on a global scale by 2010,
ker je svetovni vrh o trajnostnem razvoju v Johannesburgu leta 2002 uvidel, da ima biotska raznovrstnost odločilno vlogo v celotnem trajnostnem razvoju in odpravi revščine ter je bistvena za naš planet, zdravje in preživetje ter kulturno integriteto ljudi; in ker je načrt za izvajanje iz Johannesburga potrdil globalni cilj o doseganju znatnega znižanja sedanje stopnje izgube biotske raznovrstnosti do leta 2010,
whereas the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg in 2002 recognised that biodiversity plays a critical role in overall sustainable development and poverty eradication, and is essential to our planet, human well-being and the livelihood and cultural integrity of people; and whereas the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation confirmed the global objective of achieving a significant reduction in the current rate of loss of biological diversity by 2010,
ker je omrežje zaščitenih območij Natura 2000, sestavljeno iz področij, ki sta jih določili direktive o pticah in Direktiva Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
whereas the Natura 2000 network of protected areas, made up of sites designated under the Birds Directive and Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
("direktiva o habitatih"), glavna opora ukrepa Skupnosti za ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti,
("the Habitats Directive"), is a key pillar of Community action for the conservation of biodiversity,
ker je v preteklosti večina držav članic po sedanji uredbi o razvoju podeželja omejila izkoriščanje priložnosti za izvajanje Nature 2000; ker sta programa za regionalni razvoj in razvoj podeželja pogosto delovala proti prednostnim nalogam ohranjanja narave v EU,
whereas in the past most Member States have made limited use of the opportunities under the current rural development regulation to implement Natura 2000; whereas rural development and regional development programmes have often worked against EU nature conservation priorities,
ker lahko kmetje in lastniki gozdov s svojim načinom gospodarjenja znatno prispevajo k ohranitvi in trajnostni rabi biotske raznovrstnosti na kmetijskih površinah; mnogokrat je to povezano z dodatnimi stroški, ki jih je treba ustrezno kompenzirati,
whereas farmers and forest owners can make a significant contribution to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity on farmland through their management practices, and in many cases this results in additional spending which must be adequately compensated,
ker znaša leta 2004, od skupnega proračuna EU v vrednosti 111,3 milijarde EUR, pokrivanje stroškov za kmetijske trge in neposredna plačila s strani EU 40,2 milijarde EUR, v primerjavi s 6,5 milijarde EUR za politiko razvoja podeželja; ker je sedanja politika razvoja podeželja še vedno usmerjena k ciljem strukturne politike in ne k zagotovitvi varstva narave ter podpiranju okolju prijaznih in trajnostnih načinov kmetovanja,
whereas in 2004, out of a total EU budget of EUR 111.3 billion, EU funding for agricultural market expenditure and direct aid amounted to EUR 40.2 billion, compared to EUR 6.5 billion for rural development policy; whereas the present rural development policy is still geared towards structural policy objectives, rather than ensuring nature protection and supporting environmentally friendly and sustainable farming practices,
ker predlogi Komisije za finančno perspektivo za obdobje 2007-2013 spoštujejo odločitev, ki jo je sprejel Svet leta 2002 v Bruslju, o zamrznitvi kmetijskih stroškov na ravni iz leta 2006, z omogočeno letno prilagoditvijo stopnje inflacije za 1 %; ker ti predlogi predvidevajo znesek 301 milijard EUR za pokrivanje tržnih stroškov v kmetijstvu in izvajanje neposrednih plačil (povprečno 43 milijard EUR na leto) ter znesek 88,75 milijarde EUR za ukrepe za razvoj podeželja (povprečno 12,6 milijarde EUR); ker zneski za razvoj podeželja vključujejo ukrepe EKUJS, prej financirane iz strukturnih skladov,
whereas the Commission proposals for the financial perspective covering the period 2007-2013 respect the decision taken by the Council in 2002 in Brussels to freeze agricultural expenditure at the 2006 level, allowing for a yearly adaptation for inflation of 1%; whereas these proposals thus foresee an amount of EUR 301 billion for agricultural spending on market expenditure and direct payments (on average EUR 43 billion per year) and an amount of EUR 88.75 billion for rural development measures (on average EUR 12.6 billion); whereas the amounts for rural development include EAGGF measures formerly financed under Structural Funds,
ker je bil proračun za take ukrepe zamrznjen na ravni iz leta 2006, kljub dejstvu, da Evropski svet leta 2002 ni določil nobenih zgornjih meja ukrepov za razvoj podeželja, proračunska sredstva pa je namenil le Bolgariji in Romuniji, kar brez ustreznega povečanja proračuna ne bo omogočilo dodatne nove velike naloge, kot je sofinanciranje upravljanja Nature 2000,
whereas, despite the fact that in 2002 the European Council had not set any ceilings on rural development measures, the budget for such measures has also been frozen at the level of 2006, only adding appropriations for Bulgaria and Romania, which will not allow for the addition of a new major task such as co-financing the managing of the Natura 2000 network without a corresponding increase in the budget,
ker Komisija ocenjuje letne stroške upravljanja z omrežja Natura 2000 na 6,1 milijarde EUR na leto, brez upoštevanja zaščitenih morskih območij,
whereas the Commission estimates the annual costs of managing the Natura 2000 network at EUR 6.1 billion per year, without taking into account marine protected areas,
ker Komisija, v svojem sporočilu o finančnih perspektivah za leta 2007-2013 ( KOM(2004)0487 ), navaja, da "bo Komisija od držav članic zahtevala dokaz o tem, kako so pri razvoju svojih nacionalnih programov na podlagi strukturnih skladov upoštevale potrebe po financiranju okolja, vključno s pomembnimi vidiki Nature 2000 …",
whereas the Commission, in its communication on the Financial Perspectives for 2007-2013 ( COM(2004)0487 ), states that "the Commission will require Member States to show how they have taken the financing needs of the environment, including relevant aspects of Natura 2000, into account in developing their national programmes under the structural funds…",
ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu analizira tri različne scenarije za prihodnje financiranje omrežja Natura 2000,
whereas the Commission analyses three different scenarios for the future financing of the Natura 2000 network in its communication,
ker sta se Komisija in Svet s sprejetjem direktive o habitatih iz leta 1992 obvezala, da lastniki in uporabniki zemljišč ne bodo nosili finančnega bremena, ki bo nastal zaradi ukrepov iz te direktive; posebej zahteva;močno se zavzemajoč, da se ta obljuba spoštuje,
whereas the Commission and the Council, in adopting the Habitats Directive in 1992, made a clear commitment to ensure that landowners and landusers would not bear the financial burden of the measures in the directive; strongly urging that this promise be kept,
ugotavlja, da je omrežje Natura 2000, eden od glavnih stebrov ukrepov EU za ohranitev biotske raznovrstnosti in da se je biotska raznovrstnost v Evropi že močno zmanjšala;
Notes that the Natura 2000 network of protected areas across the EU is one of the main pillars of EU action on biodiversity and that much of Europe's biodiversity has already been lost;
se zaveda, da zdravi ekosistemi ne predstavljajo le pomembnih socialnih in gospodarskih virov, temveč ponujajo tudi rekreacijske možnosti ter podporo kmetijstvu in ribištvu;
Notes that healthy ecosystems provide important social and economic resources as well as recreation opportunities and support for farming and fisheries;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za predlog strateškega pristopa k sofinanciranju Nature 2000 in izjavo komisarja Dimasa na Mednarodni konferenci "Biotska raznovrstnost, znanost in upravljanje" 24. januarja 2005 v Parizu;
Welcomes the initiative of the Commission to propose a strategic approach to co-finance Natura 2000 and the statement made by Commissioner Dimas at the International Conference on "Biodiversity, Science and Governance" on 24 January 2005 in Paris;
pozdravlja izjavo Komisije, da morajo skladi EU za razvoj podeželja in strukturni skladi bistveno prispevati k sofinanciranju omrežja Natura 2000; pozdravlja tudi omogočanje financiranja Nature 2000 iz skladov za razvoj podeželja in strukturnih skladov; kljub temu, po proučitvi ustreznih predlogov (strukturnih, podeželskih in Life+), meni, da so nezadostni za ustrezno sofinanciranje omrežja Natura 2000, in zato vztraja, da se za ta namen predlaga ustrezen sklad;
Welcomes the Commission statement that the EU rural development and structural funds should make a substantial contribution towards co-financing the Natura 2000 network; further welcomes the enabling of financing for Natura 2000 from rural development and structural funds; nevertheless, having examined the relevant proposals (structural, rural and Life+), considers them insufficient for the adequate co-funding of the Natura 2000 network and therefore also insists that a dedicated fund be set up for this purpose;