natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Predlog direktive Sveta o ravnanju z izrabljenim gorivom in radioaktivnimi odpadki (KOM 2010/618) je pripravljen za vzpostavitev pravnega okvirja EU za ravnanje z izrabljenimi gorivi in radioaktivnimi odpadki in zagotovitev primernih nacionalnih ukrepov za visoko stopnjo varnosti za zaščito delavcev in širše javnosti pred nevarnostjo sevanja.
The proposal for a Council directive on the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (COM(2010)618) has been drafted with a view to establishing an EU legal framework for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste and ensuring that appropriate national measures are put in place to guarantee a high level of safety to protect workers and the general public from radiation risks.
To je odziv evropske politike na zaskrbljenost javnosti glede radioaktivnih odpadkov in ravnanja z njimi.
This is the EU’s political response to public concerns about radioactive waste and its management.
Evropski parlament je edina evropska institucija, v katero so njeni predstavniki izvoljeni na neposrednih evropskih volitvah.
The European Parliament is the only European institution whose representatives are directly elected at European elections.
To je predstavniška institucija javnosti, zato kot poročevalka za ta dokument sprašujem:
It is the institution which represents the people.
Ali bo Evropska komisija v postopku sprejemanja direktive upoštevala mnenje Evropskega parlamenta?
Therefore, as the rapporteur for this document, I would like to ask whether the Commission will take account of Parliament’s opinion in the procedure for the adoption of this directive.
(8. april 2011)
(8 April 2011)
Pogodba o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in zlasti člen 31 Pogodbe določa posebni zakonodajni postopek, v skladu s katerim Svet sprejme direktivo na predlog Komisije po posvetovanju z Evropskim parlamentom in Ekonomsko-socialnim odborom.
The Euratom Treaty, and in particular Article 31, sets out the special legislative procedure according to which the Council adopts a directive on a proposal from the Commission, after consultation of the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee.
Komisija bo v skladu z določbami Okvirnega sporazuma o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/relations/relations_other/docs/framework_agreement_ep-ec_en.pdf ter zlasti točke 33 Okvirnega sporazuma glede zakonodajnih postopkov, ki ne vključujejo soodločanja, upoštevala mnenje Evropskega parlamenta, tako kot je to storila v povezavi z direktivo o jedrski varnosti.
The Commission will, in line with the provisions of the framework agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/secretariat_general/relations/relations_other/docs/framework_agreement_ep-ec_en.pdf , and in particular its point 33 on the legislative procedures not entailing codecision, take into account the opinion of the EP as it did in the context of the Nuclear Safety Directive.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-002319/2011
Question for written answer E-002319/2011
Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE) , Ana Gomes (S&D) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Olle Schmidt (ALDE) in Eva‑Britt Svensson (GUE/NGL)
Judith Sargentini (Verts/ALE) , Ana Gomes (S&D) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Olle Schmidt (ALDE) and Eva-Britt Svensson (GUE/NGL)
(14. marec 2011)
(14 March 2011)
Zadeva: Utemeljitev pomoči Eritreji
Subject: Justification of aid to Eritrea
Kot dodatek k odgovorom na naše vprašanje za pisni odgovor z dne 9. novembra o dodelitvi 122 milijonov EUR pomoči Eritreji želimo dodatno pojasnilo glede utemeljitve te pomoči.
As a follow-up to the answers to our written question of 9 November on spending EUR 122 million in aid for Eritrea, we seek a further explanation about the justification for this aid.
V odgovorih piše, da Evropska komisija nudi Eritreji „ podporo pravosodnemu sektorju v Eritreji (usposabljanje in pomoč sodiščem) in podporo Nacionalni konfederaciji delavcev Eritreje (National Confederation of Eritrean Workers) za krepitev socialnega dialoga v Eritreji “.
The answers state that the EC is providing Eritrea with ‘support for the Justice Sector in Eritrea (training and support of magistrate courts) and support to the National Confederation of Eritrean Workers for the strengthening of the social dialogue in Eritrea’.
Kako si Komisija zamišlja socialni dialog med združenjem delavcev in represivnim režimom Isaiasa Afervekija?
How does the Commission envisage a social dialogue between a workers’ union and the oppressive regime of Isiajas Afewerki?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da lahko socialni dialog poteka le v okolju, kjer lahko obe strani govorita iskreno, in da okoliščine v Eritreji trenutno niso take?
Would the Commission agree that a social dialogue requires an atmosphere in which both sides must be able to speak openly, and that this is not the case in Eritrea at the moment?
Kako lahko Komisija zagotovi, da je denar dobro porabljen?
How can the Commission guarantee that the money is well spent?
In kako kaže v zvezi s tem?
And what are the indications for this?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da spodbujanje socialnega dialoga z nedemokratičnim režimom daje legitimnost temu režimu?
Does the Commission agree that facilitating a social dialogue with a non-democratic regime legitimises that same regime?
Ali se Komisija strinja, da razvojni projekti za obnovo države predvidevajo vključevanje eritrejskih oblasti?
Does the Commission agree that development projects in the field of rebuilding the country presume the involvement of the Eritrean authorities?
Kako Komisija ocenjuje stanje na področju človekovih pravic v Eritreji?
What is the Commission’s assessment of the human rights situation in Eritrea?
Ali ne bi morali glede na to, da so človekove pravice bistven element razvojnega sodelovanja v skladu s sporazumom iz Cotonouja, temu režimu začasno odreči vso finančno podporo razen humanitarne pomoči?
Taking into account that human rights are an essential element for development cooperation in the Cotonou Agreement, should not the financial support to this regime, other than humanitarian aid, be put on hold?
Ali ne bi morala EU glede na trenutne dogodke v državah, ki mejijo na Eritrejo, predsednika Afervekija opozoriti, da se bodo ljudje slej ko prej uprli nadaljnji represiji in kršitvam človekovih pravic?
Given the current developments in the countries neighbouring Eritrea, should not the EU convey to President Afewerki that continuing oppression and human rights violations will sooner or later turn the people against him?
Glede na omejitve za civilno družbo in organizacije ter neobstoj svobode govora v Eritreji se pričakuje, da bo projekt za podporo Nacionalni konfederaciji delavcev Eritreje (National Confederation of Eritrean Workers), ki ga financira EU, prispeval k oblikovanju strukture za tristranski socialno-ekonomski dialog na nacionalni ravni ter s tem tudi k spodbujanju učinkovitega socialnega dialoga.
In the context of the restrictions applied to civil society and organisations as well as the absence of freedom of speech in Eritrea, the EU‑funded project ‘Support to the National Confederation of Eritrean Workers’ (NCEW) is expected to support the creation of a structure for a tripartite-based socioeconomic dialogue on national level and thus to the promotion of effective social dialogue.
Eden od ciljev projekta Nacionalne konfederacije delavcev Eritreje je razvoj učinkovitega sistema odnosov med delodajalci in delojemalci za ploden socialni dialog z delodajalci in vlado, s katerim se bodo spodbujali in podpirali interesi delavcev.
One of NCEW’s project objectives is to develop a sound industrial relations system for meaningful social dialogue with employers and the government for promoting and furthering workers interests.
Evropska komisija pripravlja in izvršuje svoj proračun ter o njem poroča v skladu z načeli finančnega poslovodenja, ki temeljijo na najboljših mednarodnih praksah.
The European Commission prepares, executes and reports on its budget according to financial management principles based on the best international good practices.
Za proračun EU in posebna proračunska sredstva, s katerimi upravlja Komisija v imenu držav članic Evropske unije, kot je na primer Evropski razvojni sklad, mora Evropski parlament vsako leto dati razrešnico na osnovi priporočila Sveta in izjave o zanesljivosti Računskega sodišča.
The EU budget and the extra-budgetary funds that the Commission administers on behalf of the European Union Member States, such as the European Development Fund, are subject to annual discharges from the European Parliament, on the basis of the recommendation from the Council and the declaration of assurance provided by the Court of Auditors.
Računi EU temeljijo na modernem sistemu računovodstva na podlagi nastanka poslovnih dogodkov, ki vključuje tako proračun EU kot Evropski razvojni sklad.
The EU accounts are based on modern accrual-accounting systems integrating both the EU budget and the European Development Fund.
Poleg tega Komisija izvaja predhodne in naknadne kontrole svojih finančnih transakcij.
Furthermore the Commission applies ex-ante controls and ex-post controls to its financial transactions.
Natančneje se, kar zadeva upravljanje ERS, o programih odločajo skupaj država upravičenka, Evropska komisija in države članice EU v skladu s temeljno razvojno strategijo, kot je predvideno v Sporazumu iz Cotonouja.
More specifically, regarding the management of the EDF, programmes are decided jointly by the beneficiary country, the European Commission and EU Member States in compliance with the underpinning development strategy, as foreseen in the Cotonou Agreement.
Pri izvajanju programov se uporabljajo različni kontrolni mehanizmi: zunanje finančne revizije ter vmesne in finančne ocene, ki jih izvajajo zunanji svetovalci, so obvezne in predvidene v sporazumih o financiranju.
Implementation of programmes is subject to several control mechanisms: financial external audits and mid‑term and financial evaluations carried out by external consultants are compulsory and foreseen in the financing agreements.
EU uporablja tudi dodatne mehanizme za zagotavljanje kakovosti, kot so letne, v rezultate usmerjene spremljevalne misije za ocenjevanje učinkovitosti in uspešnosti projektov.
The EU also utilises additional quality-assurance mechanisms such as annual results-oriented monitoring missions to assess projects' efficiency and effectiveness.
Ne nazadnje so informacije o dejavnostih na področju javnih naročil javno dostopne, vključno z letnimi poročili o dejavnostih in tematskimi ocenjevanji.
Finally, information on public procurement activities is publicly available, including annual reports on activities and thematic evaluations.
Delegacija EU v Eritreji je posebno previdna in uporablja vse razpoložljive mehanizme spremljanja in revizije.
The EU Delegation in Eritrea is particularly cautious and implements all available monitoring and audit mechanisms at its disposal.
Na splošno lahko rečemo, da je denar, porabljen za Eritrejo, porabljen pravilno.
In general, one can say that money spent in Eritrea is correctly spent.
Socialni dialog je prvi pogoj za dobro upravljanje in demokratični razvoj ter tudi za doseganje nacionalnih ekonomskih in socialnih ciljev ter prispevanje k politikam zmanjševanja revščine.
Social dialogue is a prerequisite for good governance and democratic development, as well as a means to attain national economic and social objectives and to contribute to poverty reduction policies.
Spodbujanje socialnega dialoga v nedemokratični ureditvi ne pomeni priznavanja legitimnosti te ureditve (vlada je akter, ki ima dejansko moč), pač pa prej omogočanje nastanka kulture demokracije.
Facilitating a social dialogue within a non-democratic regime has little to do with its legitimisation (the government is the actor that holds effective power), but quite a lot with making room for democratic culture to emerge.
Omogočanje socialnega dialoga v družbi, kjer je malo prostora za razhajajoča se mnenja ali ga sploh ni, je že korak naprej.
Creating an opportunity for a social dialogue within a society where there is little or no space for divergent opinions is already a step forward.
Evropska komisija je še vedno zaskrbljena zaradi razmer na področju človekovih pravic v Eritreji.
The European Commission remains concerned about the human rights situation in Eritrea.
Neprekinjeno pridržanje zapornikov vesti brez sojenja in pravic do obiskov, neobstoj svobodnega tiska, hudo omejevanje svobode izražanja, kršitve verske svobode in neizvajanje bistvenih določb iz eritrejske ustave so med drugim zadeve, ki jih EU globoko obžaluje.
The continued detention without trial or visitation rights of prisoners of conscience, the absence of a free press, severe restrictions on freedom of expression, violations of religious freedoms and the non-implementation of key provisions of the Eritrean Constitution are some of the matters that the EU gravely deplores.
Komisija verjame, da bo Eritreja znatno napredovala pri ekonomskem in socialnem razvoju šele, ko se bo izboljšalo stanje na področju človekovih pravic.
The Commission believes that Eritrea will only make significant strides towards economic and social development when the human rights situation improves.
Odločitev o finančni podpori temelji na natančni oceni in se redno pregleduje.
The decision is based on a careful assessment and is reviewed on a regular basis.
EU trenutno meni, da morajo biti kljub izzivom in tveganjem prva skrb prebivalci Eritreje.
At the moment, the EU judges that, despite the challenges and risks, the primary concern should be the people of Eritrea.
Pomembno je tudi, da ima EU prek razvojnega sodelovanja priložnost za dialog z organi Eritreje, če želi vplivati na politične razmere.
It is also important to have an opportunity, through development cooperation, for dialogue with Eritrean authorities if the EU wishes to have a chance to influence the political situation.
Prek dejavnosti v okviru posameznih projektov lahko EU vpliva na nekatera občutljiva področja, kot so pravice delavcev in sodstvo, kjer lahko deluje prek svoje finančne pomoči.
Through certain project interventions, the EU can exert influence in some sensitive areas such as the rights of workers and justice where the EU can be active through EU financial assistance.
EU želi biti zmožna prispevati k reševanju zaskrbljujočih razmer v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in upravljanjem države, zato z eritrejsko vlado ohranja dialog na podlagi člena 8 Sporazuma iz Cotonouja.
The EU's desire to be in a position to address concerns over the human rights and governance situation is one of the reasons why the EU maintains Article 8 dialogue with the Eritrean Government.
S političnim dialogom z Eritrejo je EU lahko poudarila, da so vključujoč pristop, notranji dialog in socialna kohezija odločilni, da lahko dobro upravljanje pridobi pristno podporo za svoje politike in celo izboljša svojo verodostojnost v regiji.
Political dialogue with Eritrea gave the EU an opportunity to point out that an inclusive approach, internal dialogue and social cohesion are critical for a good government to gather genuine support for their policies and can also improve its regional credibility.
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-002994/2011
Question for written answer E-002994/2011
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , baronica Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Bill Newton Dunn (ALDE) , Vilja Savisaar-Toomast (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Renate Weber (ALDE) , Edward McMillan-Scott (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) in Jens Rohde (ALDE)
Marietje Schaake (ALDE) , Johannes Cornelis van Baalen (ALDE) , Baroness Sarah Ludford (ALDE) , Bill Newton Dunn (ALDE) , Vilja Savisaar-Toomast (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) , Renate Weber (ALDE) , Edward McMillan-Scott (ALDE) , Sophia in 't Veld (ALDE) and Jens Rohde (ALDE)
Zadeva: Oblikovanje depozitnega računa za zadržanje tekočih plačil libijski naftni industriji
Subject: Creation of escrow account to hold ongoing payments to Libya's oil industry
Dne 28. februarja 2011 je EU v skladu z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta ZN z dne 26. februarja 2011 sprejela sankcije proti Libiji, vključno z embargom na orožje, prepovedjo izvoza opreme za notranjo represijo, prepovedjo vizumov, omejitvami glede sprejema ter zamrznitvijo finančnih sredstev in ekonomskih virov, v odgovor na hude kršitve človekovih pravic s strani Gadafijevega režima proti prebivalcem Libije.
On 28 February 2011, following the UNSC resolution of 26 February 2011, the EU adopted, sanctions against Libya, including an arms embargo, a ban on internal repression equipment, visa bans, restrictions on the admission and the freezing of funds and economic resources, in response to the grave human rights violations by the Gaddafi regime against the Libyan people.
Ti ukrepi so bili razširjeni dne 10. marca 2011.
These measures were extended on 10 March 2011.
Vse do danes te sankcije niso uspele zajeziti brutalnega pokola prebivalcev Libije, ki ga izvaja Gadafijev režim.
To date these sanctions have not resulted in the halting of the brutal slaughter of the Libyan people by the Gaddafi regime.
Te sankcije tudi niso uspele preprečiti plačil libijski nacionalni naftni družbi (NOC).
Neither have these sanctions prevented payments to the Libyan National Oil Company (NOC).
Posledično ima Gadafijev režim še vedno na voljo veliko sredstev za izvajanje brutalnega nasilja in za kupovanje zaveznikov, zlasti z novačenjem vojakov iz podsaharske Afrike. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/africa/16mali.html?_r=1&smid=tw-nytimes&seid=auto
Consequently the significant funds still available enable the Gaddafi regime to exercise brutal force and to buy allies, in particular by recruiting sub-Saharan African soldiers http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/africa/16mali.html?_r=1&smid=tw-nytimes&seid=auto .
Naknadni pozivi začasnega prehodnega nacionalnega sveta Libijske republike (TNC), Organizacije islamske konference, Arabske lige, nekaterih držav članic EU in skupine ALDE za uvedbo prepovedi letenja nad Libijo niso privedli do dejanskega ukrepanja EU ali Varnostnega sveta ZN.
Subsequent calls by the Interim Transitional National Council of the Libyan Republic (TNC) the Organisation of the Islamic Conference, the Arab League, some EU Member States and the ALDE Group to impose a no-fly zone over Libya have not lead to concrete action by either the EU or the UNSC.
Ker EU in mednarodna skupnost nista uspeli obvladati in zaustaviti hudega nasilja v Libiji ter sta doslej uspeli demokratičnim silam v Libiji zagotoviti podporo le z besedami, ne pa tudi z dejanji, pozivamo Komisijo, naj preuči naslednje ukrepe in prevzame vodstvo pri pozivanju EU in mednarodne skupnosti k takojšnjemu ukrepanju: 1.
As the EU and the international community fail to address and stop the grave violence in Libya and until now are only capable of supporting the democratic forces in Libya in words but not in actions, we urge the Commission to consider the following measures and ask it to take the lead in urging the EU and the international community to act now: 1.
Ali je podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica pripravljena prevzeti vodstvo pri oblikovanju enotnega mednarodnega depozitnega računa pod okriljem ZN To zahteva med drugim tudi mreža za poseg proti genocidu/koalicija Save Darfur. – v skladu s poglavjema VII in VIII Listine Združenih narodov – na katerega bi bila preusmerjena vsa plačila mednarodne skupnosti NOC-u, centralni banki Libije in podobnim ustanovam?
Is the Vice President/High Representative willing to take the lead in the establishment of a UN-governed unified international escrow account As is also requested a.o. by the Genocide Intervention Network/Save Darfur Coalition. — under Chapters VII and VIII of the United Nations Charter — to which all payments by the international community to NOC, the Central Bank of Libya and similar entities can be diverted?
Če ne, zakaj ne? 2.
If not, why not? 2.
Če je podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica pripravljena prevzeti vodstvo pri oblikovanju takšnega računa, ali je pripravljena tudi imenovati Arabsko ligo, Afriško unijo in Organizacijo islamske konference za primarne odgovorne stranke za upravljanje mednarodnega depozitnega računa?
If the Vice President/High Representative is willing to take the lead in the establishment of such an account, is she also willing to appoint the Arab League, the African Union and the Organisation of the Islamic Conference as the primary responsible parties in governing the international escrow account?
Če ne, zakaj ne? 3.
If not, why not? 3.
Ali je podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica pripravljena pozvati države članice EU, naj sprostijo zamrznjena sredstva Gadafijevega režima v EU in jih zagotovijo upornikom, ki jih zastopa TNC, po vzoru podobne pobude ZDA? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-libya-usa-assets-idUSTRE72E79X20110315 Če ne, zakaj ne?
Is the Vice President/High Representative willing to call upon the EU Member States to free up frozen assets of the Gaddafi regime in the EU and provide these to the rebels, as represented by the TNC, following a similar initiative by the US? http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/15/us-libya-usa-assets-idUSTRE72E79X20110315 If not, why not?
Vprašanje za pisni odgovor E-003253/2011
Question for written answer E-003253/2011
Luigi de Magistris (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) in Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE)
Luigi de Magistris (ALDE) , Ivo Vajgl (ALDE) and Michèle Rivasi (Verts/ALE)
Zadeva: Zahteva po obveznih standardih za jedrsko varnost in neodvisnem evropskem organu
Subject: Request for mandatory nuclear safety standards and an independent European authority
Močan potres, ki je v petek, 11. marca, prizadel Japonsko in povzročil škodo na jedrski elektrarni Fukušima, je spodbudil EU, da si zastavi vprašanje o lastni jedrski varnosti.
Damage caused to Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power station after the strong earthquake ripped though the Asian country on Friday, 11 March prompted the EU to pose questions about its own nuclear safety.
Evropski komisar za energijo Günther Oettinger je po izrednem sestanku z nacionalnimi organi za jedrsko varnost ter dobavitelji in upravljavci jedrskih elektrarn, ki je potekal 13. marca, naznanil začetek „testov izjemnih situacij“, s katerimi bi preverili tveganje zaradi morebitnih potresov, cunamijev, terorističnih napadov, izpadov električne energije ipd.
After a special meeting on 13 March with national nuclear safety authorities and nuclear power plant vendors and operators, EU Energy Commissioner Günther Oettinger launched ‘stress tests’ in order to assess nuclear plant exposure to potential earthquakes, tsunamis, terror attacks and power cuts, amongst other variables.
Medtem so nekateri evropski voditelji potrdili, da ne želijo zapreti svojih jedrskih elektrarn.
Meanwhile some European leaders have affirmed that they are unwilling to shut down their nuclear plants.
Trenutno ima jedrske elektrarne 14 od 27 držav članic: Francija jih ima 58, Združeno kraljestvo 19, Nemčija 17, Švedska 10, Španija 8, Belgija 7, Češka 6, Slovaška in Finska 4, Bolgarija 2, Nizozemska in Slovenija pa po 1.
For the time being, 14 out of 27 Member States have nuclear plants: France 58, the UK 19, Germany 17, Sweden 10, Spain 8, Belgium 7, the Czech Republic 6, Slovakia and Finland 4, Bulgaria 2, the Netherlands and Slovenia 1.
Nekatere druge države, na primer Italija in Poljska, načrtujejo izgradnjo jedrskih elektrarn v kratkem.
Others, such as Italy and Poland, are planning to go for nuclear very soon.
Leta 2009 je italijanski predsednik vlade Silvio Berlusconi podpisal sporazum s francoskim predsednikom Nicolasom Sarkozyjem o izgradnji jedrskih elektrarn v Italiji s francosko tehnologijo.
In 2009 Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi signed an agreement with French President Nicolas Sarkozy to build nuclear plants in Italy using French technologies.
V skladu z Direktivo EU 2009/71/Euratom z dne 25.06.2009 o jedrski varnosti morajo države članice določiti in nenehno izboljševati nacionalne varnostne predpise.
According to EU Directive 2009/71/Euratom on Nuclear Safety of 25 June 2009, Member States have to lay down and continuously improve national safety rules.