natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da je v boju proti terorizmu kongres ZDA od administracije ZDA dolgo časa zahteval sprejetje bolj ciljno naravnanih ukrepov, ki bi bolje varovali zasebnost in nad katerimi bi se izvajal parlamentarni in sodni nadzor (enaka zahteva je bila postavljena, ko se je Kongres seznanil z obstojem programa Nacionalne varnostne agencije (NSA) za prisluškovanje telefonskim pogovorom);
Notes that in the fight against terrorism the US Congress has for some time asked the US administration to adopt more targeted measures that better ensure privacy and are subject to parliamentary and judicial control (as was demanded when Congress was made aware of the existence of the National Security Agency (NSA) programme of telephone tapping);
potrjuje svojo zadržanost, s katero je nedavno soglašal Kongres, do načina profiliranja in zbiranja podatkov, za katerega je značilno vsesplošno kopičenje vedno večjega obsega osebnih podatkov, kot se dogaja v primeru sistema ATS, ki ga uporablja administracija ZDA;
Confirms its reservations that have recently been shared by Congress as regards the method of profiling and data mining, which consists in accumulating in an indiscriminate manner larger and larger volumes of personal data, as in the case of the ATS used by the US administration;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se je administracija ZDA nedavno seznanila s temi zadržki in da bo poskušala izboljšati položaj z naslednjimi ukrepi:
Welcomes the fact that the US administration has recently taken note of these reservations and that it will seek to improve the situation by means of the following steps:
imenovanje uradnikov za zasebnost in/ali oblikovanje neodvisne agencije za zasebnost v okviru zvezne uprave, ki naj bi ocenjevali vpliv na zasebnost vseh pobud, katere bi utegnile kršiti zasebnost;
the establishment of privacy officers and/or an independent privacy agency within the federal administration, who are to undertake privacy assessments of all initiatives that could potentially impinge on privacy;
vzpostavitev mehanizma, da se državljanom ZDA zagotovi pravica do pritožbe v primeru nepravilne uporabe njihovih podatkov;
setting up a mechanism to guarantee US citizens a right of appeal in the event of incorrect use of their data;
vendar verjame, da so te izboljšave nezadostne, kar zadeva varstvo podatkov za državljane EU, in da bi bilo zelo dobrodošlo, če bi Zakon o zasebnosti iz leta 1974 na podlagi vzajemnosti lahko veljal tudi za državljane EU, da bi ti lahko dostopali do svojih podatkov, jih tudi popravljali in spreminjali, ter bi imeli dostop do pravnega mehanizma za odškodovanje in do neodvisnega organa za varstvo podatkov;
Believes, however, that these improvements are insufficient as regards data protection for EU citizens and that it would be warmly welcomed if the 1974 Privacy Act could also apply to EU citizens on a reciprocity basis in order for them to have access to their data, with a right of rectification and modification, as well as having access to a legal redress mechanism and to an independent data protection authority;
opozarja na svoje prepričanje, da bi takšna varnostna jamstva olajšala izmenjavo podatkov in obenem zagotavljala varstvo zasebnosti ter da bi morali takšni prenosi v vsakem primeru temeljiti na enem ali več mednarodnih sporazumih, ki bi bili po strukturi podobni sporazumu o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in izročitvah med ES in ZDA, katerega trenutno preučuje Kongres ZDA;
Recalls its belief that such data protection guarantees would facilitate data sharing while ensuring protection of privacy, and that such transfers would in any case need to be based on one or more international agreements similar in structure to that of the EC/US agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and extradition which is currently being examined by Congress;
verjame, da bi morali biti Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti držav članic ter Kongres ZDA pri tem celovito vključeni, saj se tovrstni mednarodni sporazumi nanašajo na temeljne pravice tako državljanov EU kot tudi ZDA;
Believes that since such international agreements concern the fundamental rights of EU as well as US citizens, the European Parliament and the national parliaments of the Member States should be fully involved, as should Congress;
poudarja potrebo po sprejetju okvirnega sklepa o varstvu osebnih podatkov v tretjem stebru; opozarja na dejstvo, da je v stališču, ki ga je soglasno sprejel dne 27. septembra 2006 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2006)0370 .
Stresses the need for the adoption of a framework decision on the protection of personal data in the third pillar; draws attention to the fact that, in the position it adopted unanimously on 27 September 2006 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2006)0370 .
, pozval k oblikovanju celovite in ambiciozne odločitve na področju uporabe, s kateri bi se poskrbelo za pravila o varstvu podatkov, ki bi urejala tudi izmenjavo osebnih podatkov s tretjimi državami;
, it called for such a decision to be comprehensive and ambitious in scope and to provide for data protection rules also covering the exchange of personal data with third countries;
pričakuje, da bo na naslednjem vrhunskem srečanju EU-ZDA dne 30. aprila 2007 prišlo do razprave o tej strategiji čezatlantskega partnerstva, in meni, da bi bilo treba v tej luči okrepiti stike med Parlamentom in Kongresom; zahteva, da:
Expects that this strategy of transatlantic partnership will be discussed at the next EU-US summit on 30 April 2007 and considers that, in this perspective, contacts should be strengthened between Parliament and Congress; requests that:
se poročevalcem Parlamenta dovoli, da so prisotni na predstavitvi o temah, ki so v skupnem interesu (sporazum o pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah in izročitvah med ES in ZDA, ATS, SWIFT), v Kongresu ZDA;
rapporteurs from Parliament be allowed to attend a hearing in Congress on themes that are of mutual interest (the EC-US agreement on judicial cooperation in criminal matters and extradition, ATS, SWIFT);
se predsednike pristojnih odborov Kongresa povabi pred naslednjim čezatlantskim dialogom (Bruselj-Berlin sredi aprila 2007) in v vsakem primeru pred naslednjim spomladanskim vrhunskim srečanjem EU-ZDA;
the chairs of the competent Congressional committees be invited with a view to the next transatlantic dialogue (Brussels-Berlin in mid-April 2007) and in any event before the next EU-US spring summit;
poudarja, da bi moral imeti prihodnji dolgoročni sporazum PNR, razen v točkah, ki jih je Parlament sprejel že v svojem zgoraj navedenem stališču dne 27. septembra 2006, podlago v naslednjih načelih:
Stresses that, in addition to the points already adopted by Parliament its above-mentioned position of 27 September 2006, a future long-term PNR agreement should be founded on the following principles:
oblikovanje politik, utemeljeno na dokazih: pred sklenitvijo novega sporazuma je treba pripraviti temeljito oceno; odgovoriti bi bilo treba na vprašanje učinkovitosti obstoječega sporazuma (in tistega prejšnjega), pa tudi na vprašanje stroškov in konkurenčnosti evropskih letalskih družb; ocena se mora nanašati na izvajanje obvez in na vprašanje podatkov iz PNR v ATS;
evidence-based policy-making: a thorough evaluation must be carried out before a new agreement is concluded; the question of the effectiveness of the current agreement (and the previous one) should be addressed, as should the issue of the costs and competitiveness of European airline companies; the evaluation must address the implementation of the undertakings and the matter of PNR data in ATS;
prenos PNR mora temeljiti na jasnem načelu omejevanja na podlagi namena;
transfers of PNR must be based on a clear purpose limitation principle;
in je zato v primerljivem režimu že mogoča njihova izmenjava z ZDA; kot kaže, imajo podatki o obnašanju v PNR le omejeno uporabnost, saj jih ni mogoče prepoznati, če niso povezani s sistemom APIS; utemeljitev za splošen prenos podatkov iz PNR torej ni zadovoljiva;
, and may therefore be exchanged with the US under a comparable regime; behaviour data in the PNR seem to be of limited use, as they cannot be identified if not linked to APIS; the justification for the general transfer of PNR data is therefore not satisfactory;
prihodnji sporazum mora temeljiti na ugotavljanju primernosti, kar zadeva varstvo osebnih podatkov; z strani EU je očitno, da so nujno potrebna pravila za varstvo osebnih podatkov v tretjem stebru, pa tudi svetovni standardi, ki bi urejali vse kategorije osebnih podatkov;
a future agreement must be based on an adequacy finding with regard to the protection of personal data; from the EU side, it is clear that rules for the protection of personal data in the third pillar are urgently needed, as well as global standards covering all categories of personal data;
obstajati mora redno ocenjevanje primernosti in učinkovitosti varstva podatkov v programu pri čemer sodeluje Parlament in po možnosti Kongres; letno ocenjevanje mora biti del vsakega prihodnjega sporazuma; poročilo o oceni je treba objaviti in predložiti Parlamentu;
there must be a regular evaluation of the programme's data protection adequacy and effectiveness, involving Parliament and, if possible, Congress; an annual evaluation must be part of any future agreement; the evaluation report must be made public, and must be submitted to Parliament;
pogoji, ki so trenutno določeni v obveznostih ZDA, morajo postati sestavni del sporazuma in morajo biti pravno obvezujoči; prihodnji sporazum mora imeti več demokratične legitimnosti s celovito udeležbo Evropskega parlamenta in/ali ratifikacijo v nacionalnih parlamentih;
the conditions currently laid down in the US undertakings must become an integral part of the agreement and must be legally binding; a future agreement must have more democratic legitimacy, with the full involvement of the European Parliament and/or ratification by national parliaments;
v vsakem primeru mora prihodnji sporazum temeljiti na sistemu PUSH, sistem PULL pa ne bi smel biti več sprejemljiv, saj bi moral že prejšnji sporazum uvesti sistem PUSH, takoj ko je bil tehnično izvedljiv;
in any event, a future agreement must be based on the PUSH system, and the PULL system should no longer be acceptable given that PUSH should already have been introduced under the previous agreement, as soon as it was technically feasible;
potniki bi morali biti obveščeni o prenosu evidenc iz PNR in imeti dostop do svojih podatkov z možnostjo njihovega popravljanja in spreminjanja, imeti pa bi morali tudi pravno sredstvo za dostop do pravnega postopka ali neodvisnega organa za varstvo podatkov;
passengers should be informed of the transfer of PNR records and have access to their data, with a right to rectify and modify them, as well as having legal recourse to a legal procedure or to an independent data protection authority;
pričakuje, da organi ZDA v primeru prepoznane teroristične grožnje o tem sumu nemudoma obvestijo organe EU;
expects that the US authorities in the case of an acknowledged terrorist threat are obliged immediately to inform the EU authorities about such suspicion;
ponovno izraža svojo zaskrbljenost zaradi dejstva, da je SWIFT štiri leta, do sodnih pozivov, administraciji ZDA posredoval niz podatkov, obdelanih v njegovem ameriškem sistemu, vključno s podatki, ki se niso nanašali na državljane ZDA, in podatki, ki niso nastali na ozemlju ZDA, saj je SWIFT na podlagi poslovnih in sistemskih razlogov sprejel odločitev o sistematičnem kopiranju podatkov na zrcalni informacijski sistem, ki se nahaja v ZDA, kar je bilo v nasprotju z EU in nacionalnimi zakonodajami o varstvu podatkov;
Reiterates its concern over the fact that for four years SWIFT, upon receipt of subpoenas, has been transferring to the US administration a subset of data treated in its US system, including data that did not concern US citizens and data not generated on US territory, based on commercial and systemic reasons, to have systematic duplication of the data onto a mirroring information system based in the US, in violation of EU and national data protection legislation;
šteje za zelo zaskrbljujoče, da bodisi ECB bodisi skupina 10 centralnih bank, ki nadzorujejo dejavnosti SWIFT, ni že prej ostro kritiziralo tega položaja, ki krši Konvencijo o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, Listino o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije ter pogodbe in sekundarno zakonodajo (Direktiva o varstvu podatkov in Uredba (ES) št. 45/2001 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2000 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov UL L 8, 12.1.2001, str.
Considers it very worrying that this situation, in breach of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, as well as of the Treaties and secondary legislation (Data Protection Directive and Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p.
), ter da so se evropske banke in njihove stranke prek poročanja medijev šele pred kratkim seznanile s tem;
), has not been strongly criticised at an earlier stage either by the ECB or by the Group of 10 Central Banks that oversee SWIFT's activities, and that it is only recently that European banks and their customers have been made aware of the situation through press reports;
močno obžaluje, da Svet še več mesecev po razkritju teh zadev ni izrazil stališča glede tega vprašanja, ki zadeva tako številne državljane, potrošnike in podjetja, ter da je le sedem od 27 držav članic odgovorilo na vprašalnik Komisije, s katerim je hotela pridobiti pojasnila o spoštovanju nacionalnih zakonov o varstvu podatkov in zakonov Skupnosti o varstvu podatkov;
Deeply regrets the fact that, several months after these matters came to light, the Council has not yet taken a stance on this subject affecting so many citizens, consumers and enterprises, and that only seven out of 27 Member States have responded to the questionnaire sent by the Commission to obtain clarification in relation to respect for national and Community data protection laws;
podpira stališče, ki ga je ENVP izrazil glede vloge ECB, in jo poziva, naj:
Endorses the opinion expressed by the EDPS on the role of the ECB and calls on the ECB:
kot nadzornik družbe SWIFT poišče rešitve za zagotavljanje izpolnjevanja pravil o varstvu podatkov in za zagotavljanje, da pravila o zaupnosti ustreznim organom ne bodo preprečevala pravočasnega pridobivanja informacij;
as SWIFT overseer, to explore solutions in order to ensure compliance with data protection rules and to ensure that rules on confidentiality do not prevent information from being supplied in good time to the relevant authorities;
kot uporabnik storitev SWIFT Net-FIN poišče rešitve, da bi se dejavnosti plačilnega prometa tega ponudnika uskladile z zakonodajo o varstvu podatkov, in najpozneje do aprila 2007 pripravi poročilo o sprejetih ukrepih;
as user of the SWIFT Net-FIN, to explore solutions to bring its payment operations into compliance with data protection legislation, and to prepare a report on the measures taken no later than April 2007;
kot oblikovalec politik v sodelovanju s centralnimi bankami in finančnimi institucijami zagotovi, da bodo evropski plačilni sistemi, vključno s posodobljenim sistemom za plačila velikih vrednosti "TARGET 2" in načrtovanim sistemom za "Target securities", če se uresniči, v celoti upoštevali evropsko zakonodajo ES o varstvu podatkov; poziva ECB, da zagotovi Evropskemu parlamentu oceno o tovrstni skladnosti;
as policymaker, to ensure, in cooperation with central banks and financial institutions, that European payment systems, including the updated 'TARGET2' system for wholesale payments, fully comply with EC data protection law; calls for the ECB to provide the Parliament with the assessment of such compliance;
ponovno izraža svoje prepričanje, da se lahko podatki, pridobljeni v finančnih transakcijah, pod jasno opredeljenimi pogoji uporabijo
Reiterates its belief that, under clearly defined conditions, data generated in financial transactions can be used
opozarja, da so v skladu s priporočilom VII skupine FATF od 31. decembra 2006 finančne institucije obvezane zbirati in hraniti evidenco določenih podatkov, ki se nanašajo na prenose sredstev v višini 1 000 USD ali več v Evropi (3 000 USD v ZDA); vse te evidence je treba na zahtevo predložiti ali dati na voljo oblastem (Glej nedavno objavljeno poročilo Mreže za pregon finančnega kriminala (FinCEN) z dne 17. januarja 2006 o poročanju o čezmejnih elektronskih prenosih sredstev: http://www.fincen.gov/news_release_cross_border.html )
Recalls that, as from 31 December 2006, under FATF Recommendation VII, financial institutions are bound to collect and retain records of certain specified data regarding fund transfers of USD 1 000 or more in Europe (USD 3 000 in the US); any of these records must be submitted or made available to the authorities upon request (See report published on 17 January 2006 by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on the reporting of cross-border wire transfer: http://www.fincen.gov/news_release_cross_border.html
opozarja na dejstvo, da SWIFT ponuja storitve tudi zunaj EU in v ZDA, ter zato meni, da bi moral vsak ukrep, ki bo sprejet, upoštevati svetovni vidik njegovih storitev;
Draws attention to the fact that SWIFT provides services outside the EU and the US and therefore considers that any measure adopted should take into account the global aspect of SWIFT's services;
poziva Komisijo, ki ima pristojnosti na področjih zakonodaje varstva podatkov in zakonodaje plačilnih sistemov, naj analizira možnosti za gospodarsko in poslovno vohunjenje, ki izhajajo iz obstoječe zasnove plačilnih sistemov v najširšem pomenu, torej še zlasti skupaj s ponudniki storitev sporočanja, in naj poroča o načinih za spopadanje s to težavo;
Calls on the Commission, which has competence both for data protection and for payment systems legislation, to analyse the potential for economic and business espionage stemming from the current design of payment systems in the broadest sense, thus including, in particular, messaging providers, and to report on ways of tackling the problem;
ugotavlja, da je mogoče finančne storitve izključiti iz sporazuma o varnem pristanu, kot v svojem mnenju 10/2006 navaja delovna skupina iz člena 29; je zaskrbljen zaradi dejstva, da je trenutno mogoče prisiliti EU podjetja in sektorje, ki poslujejo v ZDA in niso zajeti v sporazum o varnem pristanu, da dajo osebne podatke na voljo organom ZDA, zlasti ameriške podružnice evropskih bank, zavarovalnih družb, institucij socialne varnosti in ponudnike telekomunikacijskih storitev; poziva Komisijo, naj to nujno preuči;
Notes that financial services may be exempted from the Safe Harbour Agreement, as stated by the Article 29 Working Party in its Opinion 10/2006; is concerned over the fact that EU companies and sectors with operations in the US not covered by the Safe Harbour agreement may currently be forced to make personal data available to US authorities, in particular US branches of European banks, insurance companies, social security institutions and providers of telecoms services; calls on the Commission to investigate this as a matter of urgency;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter Kongresu ZDA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, as well as to the US Congress.
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije o Lizbonskem programu Skupnosti - poročilu o tehničnem izvajanju 2006 ( SEK(2006)1379 ),
having regard to Commission's Staff Work Document entitled "Community Lisbon Programme: Technical Implementation Report 2006 ( SEC(2006)1379 ),
ob upoštevanju petindvajsetih nacionalnih programov za rast in zaposlovanje, kot so jih predstavile države članice,
having regard to the 25 National Reform Programmes for Growth and Jobs as presented by the Member States (NRPs),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom "Strateški pregled boljše pravne ureditve v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2006)0689 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled "A strategic review of Better Regulation in the European Union" ( COM(2006)0689 ),
ob upoštevanju strateških smernic Komisije o ekonomski, socialni in teritorialni koheziji, 2007-2013, in smernic Komisije za izvajanje strukturnih skladov v skladu z Lizbonsko strategijo,
having regard to the Community strategic guidelines on economic, social and territorial cohesion, 2007-2013, the Commission's Guidelines for the implementation of the Structural Funds in line with the Lisbon Strategy,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru in Odboru regij z naslovom z naslovom "Globalna Evropa: konkurenca v svetu - Prispevek k strategiji EU za gospodarsko rast in delovna mesta" ( KOM(2006)0567 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission, the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions entitled "Global Europe: Competing in the World - A Contribution to the EU's Growth and Jobs Strategy" ( COM(2006)0567 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila predsednika Komisije v soglasju s podpredsednikom Verheugnom in komisarjema Almunijo in Spidlom o integriranih smernicah za rast in zaposlovanje (2005–2008) ( KOM(2005)0141 ),
having regard to the Communication from the President of the Commission in agreement with Vice-President Verheugen and Commissioners Almunia and Spidla on Integrated Guidelines for Growth and Jobs (2005-2008) ( COM(2005)0141 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Lizbpni z dne 23. in 24. marca 2000, Evropskega sveta v Stockholmu z dne 23. in 24. marca 2001 ter Evropskega sveta v Bruslju z dne 22. in 23. marca 2005 in 23. in 24. marca 2006,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council of 23 and 24 March 2000, of the Stockholm European Council of 23 and 24 March 2001, of the Brussels European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005 and of the Brussels European Council of 23 and 24 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za monetarno in ekonomsko politiko o makroekonomskem vplivu povišanja cen električne energije ( A6-0001/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs on the macro-economic impact of the increase in the price of energy ( A6-0001/2007 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu o energetski politiki za Evropo ( KOM(2007)0001 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament on an energy policy for Europe ( COM(2007)0001 ),
pozdravlja ukrepe, sprejete na spomladanskem Evropskem svetu za oživitev Lizbonske strategije, vključno z jasnejšo razdelitvijo odgovornosti za izvajanje posameznih ukrepov med države članice in Skupnost;
Welcomes the steps taken at the 2005 Spring European Council to revive the Lisbon Strategy, including a clarification of the division of responsibility for the implementation of individual measures between the Member States and the Community;