natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ponovno poudarja svojo podporo nadaljnji uporabi prožnih mehanizmov in dolgoročnemu cilju svetovnega trga z ogljikom, ki bo temeljil na sistemu trgovanja s pokrovom ( cap and trade system );
Recalls its support for the continuing use of flexible mechanisms, and for the long-term goal of a global carbon market based on cap and trade;
poziva pogodbenice COP12-COP/MOP2, naj se posvetijo vplivom, ki jih ima na podnebne spremembe letalstvo, in poziva k razpravi o globalnem davku na polete na bližnjih pogajanjih v okviru konference COP12-COP/MOP2 v Nairobiju;
Calls on the parties to COP 12-COP/MOP 2 to address the climate change impacts of international aviation and calls for a discussion on a global tax on flights at the upcoming negotiations at the COP 12-COP/MOP 2 Conference in Nairobi;
meni, da morajo industrializirane države tudi v prihodnje igrati pomembno vlogo pri reševanju težav, povezanih s podnebnimi spremembami na svetovni ravni; zato poziva stranke iz Priloge I, da izpolnijo sprejete zaveze in prevzamejo daljnosežne cilje za drugo ciljno obdobje po letu 2012; nadalje poziva tiste industrializirane države, ki niso ratificirale kjotskega protokola, naj ponovno pretehtajo svoja stališča, sprejmejo stroge notranje ukrepe in igrajo dejavno vlogo v prihodnjih mednarodnih pogajanjih s ciljem, da bodo dejavno sodelovale pri prihodnjem podnebnem režimu;
Considers that industrialised countries must continue to play a vital role in tackling climate change at world level; calls, therefore, on Annex I Parties to meet their existing commitments and to take on ambitious targets for a second commitment period after 2012; calls, moreover, on those industrialised countries that have not ratified the Kyoto Protocol to reconsider their position, to take vigorous domestic measures and to play an active role in future international negotiations, with a view to their participation in the future climate change regime;
poudarja, da je gospodarski razvoj pravica vseh držav v razvoju; vendar poudarja, naj te države ne ponovijo istih načinov onesnaževanja, kot jih poznajo industrializirane države, in zato poziva, naj se več pozornosti nameni tehnološkemu sodelovanju in vzpostavljanju zmogljivosti na področju trajnostne energije;
Stresses that economic development is a right for all developing countries; emphasises, however, that developing countries do not have to repeat the polluting practices of the industrialised countries, and calls therefore for increased attention to be paid to technology cooperation and capacity building in the field of sustainable energy;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj za prednostno nalogo razvojnega sodelovanja EU določita dostop do energetsko učinkovitih in nizkoogljičnih tehnologij;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to make access to efficient and low-carbon energy technologies a priority within EU development cooperation;
poudarja ključni pomen vključevanja držav v razvoju, ki se hitro industrializirajo, v prihodnji mednarodni podnebni režim, ob čemer je potrebno v celoti spoštovati njihove glavne interese v zvezi s spodbujanjem svojega gospodarskega razvoja in bojem proti revščini;
Emphasises the key importance of engaging the rapidly industrialising developing countries in a future international climate change regime, while fully respecting their vital concerns about promoting their economic development and fighting poverty;
pozdravlja delo delavnice okvirne konvencije za zmanjšanje emisij, ki jih povzroča krčenje gozdov v državah v razvoju, nazadnje na njenem srečanju v Rimu od 30. avgusta do 1. septembra 2006, in ugotavlja, da je bilo doseženo široko soglasje o potrebah po plačilu storitev s področja ekosistemov ter poziva k hitri vključitvi doslej izpuščenega krčenja gozdov v drugo ciljno obdobje po kjotskem protokolu, kar bo prispevalo k doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja;
Welcomes the work of the UNFCCC Workshop on reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries, most recently at its meeting in Rome from 30 August to 1 September 2006, and notes the broad agreement achieved on the need for payments for eco-system services and urges the rapid inclusion of avoided deforestation, as a contribution to achieving the Millennium Development Goals, in the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol;
ugotavlja, da bi morale biti Afrika in druge razvijajoče se regije zmožne sodelovati pri zmanjšanju globalnih emisij toplogrednih plinov in da bi morala mednarodna pogajanja vključevati spodbude, s pomočjo katerih bi se izognili krčenju gozdov; poleg tega poziva države članice, naj se zavzamejo za trajnostne gozdne projekte po načelih mehanizma čistega razvoja;
Notes that Africa and other developing regions should be able to participate in the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions and that international negotiations should include incentives to avoid deforestation; furthermore calls on Member States to engage in sustainable CDM forestry projects;
verjame, da mora globalna podnebna politika, da bi lahko učinkovito reševali vprašanja podnebnih sprememb, ustvariti enotne pogoje delovanja za industrijo in s tem spodbuditi inovacije in energetsko učinkovitost ter se izogniti uhajanju ogljika; zato predlaga, naj se za različne dejavnosti vzpostavijo globalni standardi delovanja in cilji, vključno s potrošniškimi izdelki in prevozi na globalni ravni;
Believes that in order to effectively tackle climate change global climate policy needs to create a level playing field for industry, thus encouraging innovations and energy efficiency and avoiding carbon leakage; suggests therefore, that global performance standards and targets be created for different activities, including consumer products and transportation at global level;
poudarja, da je treba vpliv podnebnih sprememb na družbo bolje razumeti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, kako bi – v Evropi in drugje – najbolje organizirali delavnice in vanje vključili interesne strani, npr. skupine državljanov, industrijo, kmetijske skupnosti, strokovnjake za varnost in ekonomiste, da bi na ta način bolje in podrobneje razumeli posledice podnebnih sprememb;
Stresses that the impact of climate change upon society must be better understood; calls on the Commission therefore to examine how to best organise workshops - in Europe and elsewhere with relevant stakeholders such as citizen groups, industry, farming communities, security experts and economists - to better understand the consequences of climate change in more detail;
vztraja, naj posamezne države EU in Evropska unija kot celota izpolnjujejo obveznosti iz kjotskega protokola in sporazuma o porazdelitvi bremena, saj bo v nasprotnem primeru to spodkopalo vodilni položaj EU v mednarodnih pogovorih;
Insists that individual EU countries, and the European Union as a whole, live up to their existing commitments under the Kyoto Protocol and the burden sharing agreement, since the EU’s leading position in international talks will be undermined if this cannot be achieved;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter sekretariatu okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja, s pozivom, naj se posreduje tudi vsem državam pogodbenicam, ki niso članice EU.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Secretariat of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, with the request that it be circulated to all non-EU contracting parties.
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0438/2006 in B6‑0439/2006
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0438/2006 and B6‑0439/2006
ki ga vlagata Karl-Heinz Florenz in Ria Oomen-Ruijten
by Karl-Heinz Florenz and Ria Oomen-Ruijten
o nadaljnjih postopkih v zvezi z mnenjem Parlamenta o varstvu okolja: boj proti kriminalu, kazniva dejanja in kazni
on the follow-up to Parliament's opinion on environmental protection: combating crime, criminal offences and penalties
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in potrošniško politiko o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja UL C 127 E, 29.5.2003, str.
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law OJ C 127 E, 29.5.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju zakonodajne resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu sklepa Sveta o vzpostavitvi okvirnega programa na podlagi naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji – Policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah (KOM(2001) 646 – C5-0694/2001 – 2001/0262(CNS) UL C 051 E, 26.2.2002, str.
having regard to the European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision establishing a framework programme on the basis of Title VI of the Treaty on European Union – Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (COM(2001) 646 – C5-0694/2001 – 2001/0262(CNS) OJ C 051 E, 26.2.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (Zadeva C-176/03, Komisija proti Svetu) (KOM (2005)0583) Še neobjavljeno v UL. ,
having regard to the communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03 Commission v. Council) (COM 2005)0583) Not yet published in the OJ. ,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (C-176/03 Komisija proti Svetu), (2006/2007(INI)) Sprejeta besedila , 14.6.2006, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0260 . ,
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the consequences of the judgment of the Court of 13 September 2005, (C-176/03 Commission/Council), (2006/2007(INI)) Texts adopted of 14.6.2006, P6_TA-PROV(2006)0260 ,
ker je Sodišče v sodbi z dne 13. septembra 2005 odločilo, da ima Evropska skupnost pravico sprejemati ukrepe v zvezi s kazenskim pravom držav članic, za katere meni, da so potrebni za zagotovitev polne učinkovitosti norm, ki jih določa na področju varstva okolja,
whereas the Court of Justice, in its judgment of 13 September 2005, ruled that the European Community is entitled to take measures which relate to the criminal law of the Member States which it considers necessary in order to ensure that the rules which it lays down on environmental protection are fully effective,
ker Sodišče meni, da določbe členov 132C in 280(4) Pogodbe o ES ne preprečujejo uskladitve kazenskega prava z namenom izvajanja okoljske politike,
whereas the Court of Justice considers that the provisions of Articles 132C and 280(4) EC do not prevent, for the purposes of the implementation of environmental policy, any harmonisation of criminal law,
ker Sodišče meni, da "okvirni sklep, s tem da posega v pristojnosti, ki jih člen 175 ES dodeljuje Skupnosti, v celoti, zaradi svoje nedeljivosti, krši člen 47 EU",
whereas the Court of Justice considers that, 'the entire framework decision, being indivisible, infringes Article 47 EU as it encroaches on the powers which Article 175 EC confers on the Community',
ker Evropska komisija v svojem sporočilu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 navaja, da določbe kazenskega prava, ki so potrebne za učinkovito izvajanje prava Skupnosti, izhajajo iz Pogodbe ES,
whereas the European Commission, in its communication on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005, stated that the provisions of criminal law required for the effective implementation of Community law are a matter for the TEC,
ker je treba pozdraviti stališče Sodišča, kot ga je Komisija ponovno obrazložila, saj podpira stališče, ki ga je zavzel Parlament v resoluciji o pravni podlagi in skladnosti s pravom Skupnosti (Koukiadisovo poročilo – resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pravni podlagi in skladnosti s pravom Skupnosti (2001/2151(INI)) UL C 76 E, 25.3.2004, str.
whereas the position taken by the Court of Justice, as re-interpreted by the Commission, is to be welcomed as it endorses the position already taken by the European Parliament in its resolution on legal bases and compliance with Community law (Koukiadis report - Resolution of the European Parliament on legal bases and compliance with Community law (2001/2151(INI)) OJ C 76 E, 25.3.2004, p.
pozdravlja sodbo Sodišča, ki je okvirni sklep o varstvu okolja, pomotoma sprejetega v okviru tretjega namesto v okviru prvega stebra, razglasila za ničnega;
Welcomes the judgment of the Court of Justice, which annulled the framework decision on environmental protection which had been adopted mistakenly under the third, rather than the first, pillar;
ugotavlja, da je sklep Sodišča povzročil pravno praznino, kar zadeva kazenskopravno varstvo okolja;
Notes that the Court of Justice decision leads to a legal vacuum regarding the protection of the environment through criminal law;
meni, da sprejetje okvirnega sklepa s strani Sveta kaže, da države članice priznavajo, da so kazenskopravni instrumenti potrebni za boljše uveljavljanje okoljevarstvene zakonodaje;
Considers that the adoption of the framework decision by the Council shows that the Member States recognise that criminal law instruments are necessary to strengthen the enforcement of environmental protection laws;
meni, da sprejetje okvirnega sklepa s strani Sveta kaže, da se države članice zavedajo potrebe po usklajevanju na področju kazenskopravnega varstva okolja;
Considers that the adoption of the framework decision by the Council shows that the Members States recognise the need for a certain harmonisation in the field of the protection of the environment through criminal law;
ugotavlja, da je Sodišče jasno opredelilo, da bi bili lahko členi 1 do 7 okvirnega sklepa pravilno sprejeti na podlagi člena 175 Pogodbe ES;
Notes that the Court clearly stated that articles 1 to 7 of the framework decision could have been properly adopted under Article 175 of the EC Treaty;
obžaluje, da Evropska komisija v svojem sporočilu o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 ni natančneje opredelila ukrepov, ki jih namerava sprejeti v zvezi s sedanjim predlogom direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja;
Regrets that the European Commission, in its communication on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005, is not more explicit on the action it intends to take in relation to the existing proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of the environment through criminal law;
poziva Svet, naj preuči prvotni predlog Komisije in ga ustrezno spremeni ali zagotovi smernice za nov predlog o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja na podlagi člena 175 Pogodbe ES;
Calls on the Council to examine the Commission's original proposal with a view to amending it or providing guidance for a new proposal on the protection of the environment through criminal law on the basis of Article 175 of the EC Treaty;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj, razen če je Svet odločen, da bo nadaljeval sprejemanje skupnega stališča o prvotnem predlogu Komisije, pripravi nov predlog o kazenskopravnem varstvu okolja na podlagi člena 175 Pogodbe ES ter pri tem upošteva sodbo Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti in vključi izid glasovanja na prvi obravnavi v Evropskem parlamentu o prvotnem predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta;
Requests that, unless the Council is determined to make progress in adopting a common position on the original Commission proposal, the European Commission draw up a new proposal on the protection of the environment through criminal law on the basis of Article 175 of the EC Treaty, taking into account the Court of Justice judgment and incorporating the result of the vote at first reading in the European Parliament on the original proposal for a European Parliament and Council directive;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the Governments and Parliaments of the Member States.
za zaključek razprave o izjavi predsednika Evropskega parlamenta in predsednikov političnih skupin
to wind up the debate on statements by the President of the European Parliament and the Chairmen of the Political Groups
v skladu s členom 103(2) Poslovnika, ki ga vlagajo:
pursuant to Rule 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure by
– Hans-Gert Poettering, József Szájer in Péter Olajos v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Hans-Gert Poettering, József Szájer and Péter Olajos, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group,
– Martin Schulz, Hannes Swoboda in Csaba Sándor Tabajdi v imenu skupine PSE
– Martin Schulz, Hannes Swoboda and Csaba Sándor Tabajdi, on behalf of the PSE Group,
– Graham Watson in István Szent-Iványi v imenu skupine ALDE
– Graham Watson and István Szent-Iványi, on behalf of the ALDE Group,
– Daniel Cohn-Bendit in Milan Horáček v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
– Daniel Cohn-Bendit and Milan Horáček, on behalf of the Verts-ALE Group,
– Brian Crowley, Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli, Wojciech Roszkowski, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis in Adam Jerzy Bielan v imenu skupine UEN
– Brian Crowley, Cristiana Muscardini, Roberta Angelilli, Wojciech Roszkowski, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Konrad Szymański, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis and Adam Jerzy Bielan, on behalf of the UEN Group,
o 50. obletnici madžarske vstaje leta 1956 in njenem zgodovinskem pomenu za Evropo
on the 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution and its historical meaning for Europe
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o 50. obletnici madžarske vstaje iz leta 1956 in njenem zgodovinskem pomenu za Evropo
European Parliament resolution on the 50th anniversary of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution and its historical meaning for Europe
ker Evropska unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, pravne države ter spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki so skupna vsem državam članicam,
whereas the European Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms – principles that are common to all Member States,
ker so bile države Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope z delitvijo z Jalte po drugi svetovni vojni za več kot štiri desetletja prikrajšane za suverenost in svobodo,
whereas the countries of Central and Eastern Europe were deprived of their sovereignty and freedom by the Yalta division of post-World War II Europe for more than four decades,
ker komunistični režimi Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope niso temeljili na soglasju ali volji ljudstva in sta jih vzdrževala sovjetska vojaška okupacija in sodelovanje komunističnih strank,
whereas the Communist regimes in Central and Eastern Europe were not based on the consent or will of the people, and were maintained by Soviet military occupation and through the collaboration of Communist parties,
ker se spominja poguma in odločnosti Madžarov, ki so 23. oktobra 1956 zavzeli ulice v protest proti diktatorski vladavini komunistične stranke,
recalling the courage and determination of Hungarians who took to the streets in protest against the dictatorial rule of the Communist Party on 23 October 1956,
ker izraža spoštovanje vztrajnosti Madžarov, ki so svoj boj za svobodo in nacionalno neodvisnost ter človekove pravice nadaljevali kljub pomanjkanju kakršnekoli vojaške pomoči Zahoda ter kljub posredovanju in veliki premoči Sovjetske zveze,
expressing its esteem for the perseverance of the Hungarians who continued their fight for freedom, national independence and civil rights in spite of the lack of any military help from the West and the intervention and overwhelming military preponderance of the Soviet Union,
ker pozdravlja človeški in politični pogum Imreja Nagyja, reformiranega komunista, predsednika madžarske vlade, ki je pravilno razumel izraz volje ljudstva in sprejel vlogo političnega vodje v ljudski vstaji za svobodo in demokracijo, pri tem pa žrtvoval svoje življenje in postal žrtev za svobodo, saj je bil leta 1958 usmrčen, ker se ni uklonil pritisku, naj se javno odreče vstaji,
saluting the human and political courage of Imre Nagy, the reform-communist prime minister of Hungary, who rightly understood the elementary expression of the will of the people and agreed to be the political leader of the popular revolution for freedom and democracy, eventually sacrificing his life and becoming a martyr for liberty as he was executed in 1958 for not bowing to pressure to publicly renounce the Revolution,
ker pozdravlja žrtve vstaje – 2170 ubitih v bojih ter žrtev krutega maščevanja – 228 usmrčenih med letoma 1956 in 1961, 20.000 priprtih in zaprtih med letoma 1956 in 1958 in tisoče, ki jih je komunistično vodstvo po vrnitvi na oblast desetletja diskriminiralo,
saluting the victims of the Revolution – 2170 killed in the fighting – and those of the cruel retaliation – 228 executed between 1956 and 1961, 20 000 taken into custody and imprisoned between 1956 and 1958, and thousands discriminated against for decades after the Revolution by the returning Communist leadership,
izraža hvaležnost za solidarnost, ki jo je ljudstvo številnih zahodnih držav pokazalo s sprejemom 194.000 madžarskih beguncev v letih 1956 in 1957,
expressing its gratitude for the solidarity shown by people in many countries of the West as they welcomed 194 000 Hungarian refugees in 1956 and 1957,
ker priznava bistveno vrednost solidarnosti med narodi na splošno in še posebej med različnimi narodi Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope v boju za svobodo – Madžari, Čehi, Slovaki, Nemci, Estonci, Latvijci in Litovci,
recognising the essential value of solidarity between nations in general and, in particular, between various nations of Central and Eastern Europe who have fought for their freedom – the Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Germans, Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians,
priznava zgodovinsko in politično vez med Madžarsko vstajo leta 1956 in raznimi drugimi uporniškimi oblikami in gibanji, na primer demonstracijami v Poznanju na Poljskem junija leta 1956, praško pomladjo leta 1968, rojstvom gibanja Solidarnost na Poljskem leta 1980 in demokratičnimi gibanji v nekdanji ZSSR, še posebej pri baltskih narodih,
recognising the historical and political link between the Hungarian Revolution in October 1956 and various other forms of resistance and resistance movements, such as the Poznan demonstrations in Poland in June 1956, the Prague Spring of 1968, the birth of the Solidarity Movement in Poland in 1980 and democracy movements in the former USSR, notably those of the Baltic peoples,
priznava, da je bila madžarska vstaja zgodovinski poskus ponovnega združenja razdeljene Evrope in kot taka ostaja mejnik v naši skupni evropski zgodovinski dediščini,
recognising that the Hungarian Revolution was a historic attempt at the reunification of a divided Europe, and as such remains a cornerstone of our common European historical heritage,
ker priznava prispevek madžarske vstaje k okrepitvi kohezije v demokratičnem svetu in k kasnejši ustanovitvi Evropskih skupnosti leta 1957 ter vlogo predhodnice političnih sprememb, ki so se odvijale v letih 1989 in 1990 v Srednji in Vzhodni Evropi ter preko evropskega integracijskega procesa omogočile mirno ponovno združitev Evrope,
recognising how the Hungarian Revolution contributed to the strengthening of cohesion in the democratic world and to the eventual founding of the European Communities in 1957, and was the antecedent to the democratic political changes that took place in 1989-1990 in Central and Eastern Europe, allowing the peaceful reunification of Europe through the European integration process,
priznava madžarsko vstajo kot simbolični izraz boja za svobodo in demokracijo v 20. stoletju, ki je kljuboval komunizmu in sovjetskemu bloku;
Recognises the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 as one of the emblematic manifestations in the 20th century of the pursuit of liberty and democracy that defied Communism in the Soviet bloc;