natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da mora biti delitev odgovornosti in finančnih bremen med državami članicami sestavni del politike priseljevanja EU ter skupnega evropskega azilnega sistema;
Believes that the sharing of responsibilities and financial burdens between Member States must be an integral part of EU immigration policy and the Common European Asylum System;
poziva k večji vlogi Evropske unije pri upravljanju humanitarnih kriz, ki so povezane z migracijskimi tokovi in iskalci azila;
Calls for a greater role for the European Union in the management of humanitarian emergencies linked to migratory flows and asylum seekers;
zato meni, da bi moral biti državam omogočen dostop do tehnične pomoči in sredstev iz programa ARGO, Evropskega sklada za begunce, Evropskega sklada za zunanje meje, Evropskega sklada za vključevanje in Evropskega sklada za vračanje za obdobje 2007–2013;
Believes, therefore, that countries should be given access to the technical assistance and funding provided under the ARGO programme, the European Refugee Fund, the European External Borders Fund, the European Integration Fund and the European Return Fund for the period 2007-2013;
meni, da je množično priseljevanje posledica neuspešnih gospodarstev, vse večje revščine prebivalstva, kršitev človekovih pravic, poslabšanja okolja, vse večjega razkoraka med bogatimi in revnimi državami, državljanskih vojn, vojn za nadzor nad naravnimi viri, političnega preganjanja, politične nestabilnosti, korupcije in diktature v številnih izvornih državah;
Believes that massive immigration is a result of failing economies, impoverishment of the population, human rights violations, environment degradation, the widening gap between rich and poor countries, civil war, wars for control of natural resources, political persecutions, political instability, corruption and dictatorships in many of the countries of origin;
poziva države članice, naj omogočijo dostop do postopka za obravnavanje prošenj za azil, naj dosledno in strogo izvršujejo določbe Direktive 2005/85/ES UL L 326, 13.12.2005, str.
Urges that the Member States establish access to the asylum application procedure, apply the provisions of Directive 2005/85/EC OJ L 326, 13.12.2005, p.
ter zagotovijo, da se prošnje za azil obravnavajo hitro in učinkovito;
in a consistent and rigorous manner and ensure that asylum applications are processed swiftly and efficiently;
priznava, da je treba sprejeti nepristransko direktivo EU o vračanju, in poziva Svet, naj si še bolj prizadeva za njeno sprejetje; obenem opaža, da Svetu v sedmih letih po zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Tampereju in kljub številnim pozivom Parlamenta ni uspelo pripraviti skupne opredelitve politike priseljevanja in je namesto tega ohranil soglasje ter postopek posvetovanja za vse zadeve, povezane z zakonitim priseljevanjem;
Recognises the need to adopt an equitable EU return directive, and calls on the Council to increase its efforts to ensure its adoption; notes at the same time the failure of the Council, seven years on from the Tampere European Council and despite numerous requests from Parliament, to define a common immigration policy, instead maintaining unanimity and the consultation procedure for all matters regarding legal immigration;
poziva države članice, naj okrepijo sodelovanje v okviru agencije Frontex in natančneje opredelijo njeno nalogo;
Urges the Member States to step up cooperation within the framework of FRONTEX and to better define its mission;
vendar meni, da so mejne kontrole in ukrepi za boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju le eden od vidikov politike EU do držav, ki niso članice Evropske unije in do katerih je treba izvajati dejavno razvojno politiko države izvora in tranzita, zato da bi zmanjšali škodljive posledice izseljevanja;
Believes, however, that border checks and action to combat illegal immigration can be only one aspect of the EU's policy towards third countries, to which an active country of origin and transit development policy must be applied with a view to minimising the damaging effects of emigration;
ugotavlja, da imajo države članice različen pristop do problematike v zvezi s sto tisoči nezakonitih priseljencev, ki delajo brez dovoljenj in vsakršnega socialnega varstva, saj ni skupne politike priseljevanja EU, vendar meni, da množična legalizacija statusa nezakonitih priseljencev ni dolgoročna rešitev, saj s takšnimi ukrepom ne bi odpravili resničnih osnovnih težav;
Realises that, in the absence of an EU common immigration policy, Member States have different approaches to the problem of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants working illegally and without any social protection; believes, however, that regularising illegal immigrants en masse is not a solution in the long term, since such a measure does not resolve the real underlying problems;
poudarja, da morajo biti vsi ukrepi za boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in za okrepitev nadzora na zunanjih mejah, tudi kadar potekajo v sodelovanju s tretjimi državami, skladni z zagotovili in temeljnimi pravicami posameznika, kot so določene v Listini o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije in Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP), zlasti s pravico do azila in pravico do nevračanja;
Stresses that any measures to combat illegal immigration and step up external border controls, even where in cooperation with third countries, must be compatible with the safeguards and the fundamental rights of the individual laid down in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, notably the right to asylum and the right of non-refoulement;
opozarja na nevarnosti eksternalizacije upravljanja zunanjih meja EU in si želi boljšega sodelovanja z državami izvora in tranzita, ki bi temeljilo predvsem na spoštovanju človekovih pravic, zlasti pravice do azila in nevračanja, ter na skupnih interesih EU in držav izvora in tranzita;
Warns against the dangers of externalising the management of the EU's external borders and hopes for better cooperation with countries of origin and transit countries founded above all on respect for fundamental rights, particularly the rights of asylum and of non-refoulement, and on the shared interests of the EU and of countries of origin and transit countries;
meni, da bi morala Evropska unija uporabiti vseobsegajoč pristop; meni, da njena politika priseljevanja ne bi smela obsegati le partnerstva s tretjimi državami, varovanja zunanjih meja zaradi boja proti trgovini z ljudmi in pravične politike vračanja, ampak obenem odpreti poti zakonitega priseljevanja, spodbujati vključevanje priseljencev v družbo gostiteljico in omogočiti skupni razvoj držav izvora, da bi odpravili osnovne vzroke za priseljevanje;
Considers that the European Union should take a cross-cutting approach; believes that its immigration policy should not only encompass partnership with third countries, the securing of external borders to combat human trafficking and an equitable return policy, but at the same time open up channels for legal immigration, encourage the integration of migrants into the host society and allow co-development of countries of origin in order to deal with the underlying causes of migration;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej da pobudo za revizijo Uredbe (ES) št. 343/2003 UL L 50, 25.2.2003, str.
Urges the Commission to take the initiative as soon as possible with a view to revising Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 OJ L 50, 25.2.2003, p.
,"Dublin II", in postavi pod vprašaj temeljno načelo te uredbe, da je država članica, ki je odgovorna za obravnavanje prošnje za azil, prva država, do katere pridejo prosilci, kar nevzdržno obremeni države na jugu in vzhodu EU, ter da uvede pravičen mehanizem za delitev odgovornosti med državami članicami;
, 'Dublin II', by calling into question its very principle, namely that the Member State responsible for dealing with an asylum application is the first country that applicants reach, which puts an intolerable burden on the countries situated in the south and the east of the EU, and by introducing a fair mechanism for sharing responsibilities among the Member States;
B6-0512 , 0513 , 0514 , 0515 , 0517 in 0519/2006
B6-0512 , 0513 , 0514 , 0515 , 0517 and 0519/2006
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razmerah v Sudanu in zlasti v Darfurju,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Sudan and Darfur in particular,
ob upoštevanju ustreznih resolucij Varnostnega sveta ZN in zlasti Resolucije Varnostnega sveta ZN 1706 z dne 31. avgusta 2006,
having regard to relevant UN Security Council Resolutions, and in particular UN Security Council Resolution 1706 of 31 August 2006,
ob upoštevanju sklepa Afriške unije (AU) iz aprila 2004 o ustanovitvi Afriške misije v Sudanu (AMIS),
having regard to the African Union (AU) decision of April 2004 to establish the African Mission in Sudan (AMIS),
ob upoštevanju svetovnega dneva za Darfur, ki je bil organiziran dne 17. septembra 2006,
having regard to the Global Day for Darfur, 17 September 2006,
ob upoštevanju darfurskega mirovnega sporazuma, podpisanega v Abudži v Nigeriji dne 5. maja 2006,
having regard to the Darfur Peace Agreement signed in Abuja, Nigeria, on 5 May 2006,
ker je darfurski regijski spor med vladnimi silami, provladnimi milicami in uporniki v zadnjih treh letih povzročil več kot 200.000 smrtnih žrtev in več kot 2 milijona notranje razseljenih oseb in beguncev, kljub podpisu darfurskega mirovnega sporazuma 5. maja 2006,
whereas the Darfur region conflict between government forces, pro-government militias and rebels has led to over 200 000 casualties and over 2 million internally displaced persons and refugees over the past three years, despite the signing of a Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA) on 5 May 2006,
ker darfurski mirovni sporazum ostaja osnova za stabilnost, mir in spravo v Darfurju, kljub izjavi posebnega predstavnika ZN Jana Pronka, da je navedeni sporazum "skoraj mrtev",
whereas the DPA remains the basis for stability, peace and reconciliation in Darfur, despite the statement by UN Special Representative Jan Pronk that the Agreement 'is nearly dead',
ker "odgovornost za zaščito" ZN zagotavlja, da se Varnostni svet ZN v skladu s poglavjem VII Ustanovne listine ZN lahko odloči za vojaški poseg, če "nacionalne oblasti očitno ne morejo zaščititi prebivalstva pred genocidom, vojnimi zločini, etničnim čiščenjem in zločini proti človeštvu",
whereas the UN 'Responsibility to Protect' provides that, where 'national authorities manifestly fail to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity,' the UN Security Council can agree to a Chapter VII military force,
ker je Varnostni svet ZN v svoji resoluciji 1706 odobril nove mirovne sile ZN z največ 22.500 vojaki in policisti, ki naj bi od Afriške misije v Sudanu (AMIS) prevzeli operacije v Darfurju, pri tem pa utrdili popolno spoštovanje suverenosti, enotnosti, neodvisnosti in ozemeljske celovitosti Sudana,
whereas the UN Security Council, in its Resolution 1706, has authorised a new UN peacekeeping force of up to 22 500 soldiers and police officers to take over Darfur operations from the African Mission in Sudan (AMIS), while reaffirming its full respect for Sudanese sovereignty, unity, independence and territorial integrity,
ker so se Združeni narodi v skladu s sklepom Afriške unije z dne 20. septembra 2006 o podaljšanju trenutnega mandata mirovnim silam v Darfurju do konca leta zavezali, da bodo zagotovili nadaljnjo logistično in materialno pomoč za AMIS,
whereas in view of the African Union decision of 20 September 2006 to extend the current mandate of its peacekeeping force in Darfur until the end of the year, the UN has committed itself to provide further logistical and material support to AMIS,
poudarja, da Sudan ni izpolnil "odgovornosti za zaščito" svojih prebivalcev in mora zato sprejeti sile ZN v skladu z Resolucijo Varnostnega sveta ZN 1706; poziva Varnostni svet ZN, naj na sudansko vlado izvaja pritisk, naj sprejme razporeditev že odobrene misije ZN v Darfurju, z jasnim mandatom v skladu s poglavjem VII in z okrepljenimi zmogljivostmi, zagotovljenimi z Resolucijo Varnostnega sveta ZN 1706;
Underlines that Sudan has failed in its 'responsibility to protect' its own people and is therefore obliged to accept a UN force in line with UN Security Council Resolution 1706; calls on the UN Security Council to bring pressure to bear on the Sudanese authorities to accept the deployment of the already authorised UN Mission to Darfur, with a clear Chapter VII mandate and enhanced capacities given to such a mission through UN Security Council Resolution 1706;
zahteva, naj sudanske oblasti ne ovirajo razporeditve in dejavnosti misije ZN v Darfurju in naj ustvarijo potrebne pogoje za učinkovito delovanje misije; poudarja, da bodo vse napake sudanskih oblasti v zvezi s tem sankcionirane;
Demands that the Sudanese authorities not only pose no obstacles to the deployment and activities of the UN Mission in Darfur but also create the conditions necessary for the effective functioning of that mission; stresses that any failings by the Sudanese authorities in this regard will be sanctioned;
v zvezi s tem poziva Kitajsko, naj izhaja iz skupne izjave Kitajske in EU z dne 9. septembra 2006, v kateri "voditelji poudarjajo, da bi bil prehod z operacije Afriške unije na operacijo ZN ugoden za mir v Darfurju"; poziva kitajsko vlado, naj na podlagi te izjave in z uporabo svojega vpliva v Sudanu sudansko vlado prepriča, naj sprejme mirovne sile ZN;
Calls, in this regard, on China to build on the joint statement made by China and the EU on 9 September 2006 in which 'leaders emphasized that transition from an AU to a UN led operation would be conducive to the peace in Darfur'; urges the Chinese Government to act on this statement by using its influence with Sudan to persuade the Government of Sudan to accept a UN peacekeeping force;
poziva EU, naj zahteva takojšnje izvajanje prepovedi letenja nad Darfurjem, ki ga uvaja Resolucija Varnostnega sveta ZN 1591 (2005); poziva mednarodno skupnost, naj se s Čadom dogovori o izvajanju prepovedi letenja iz vzhodnega Čada;
Calls on the EU to call for the urgent enforcement of the no-fly zone over Darfur established by UN Security Council Resolution 1591 (2005); urges the international community to liaise with Chad to discuss enforcing the no fly-zone from eastern Chad;
obsoja nadaljnje kršitve premirja vseh strani in še posebej nasilje nad civilnim prebivalstvom in ciljanje humanitarne pomoči;
Condemns the continuing violations of the ceasefire by all parties, and in particular the violence directed against the civilian population and the targeting of humanitarian assistance;
se je seznanil s podaljšanjem mandata misije AMIS do konca leta 2006; poudarja potrebo po okrepitvi mandata in nalog teh sil in zagotovitvi zadostnih finančnih sredstev, kakor tudi logistične in materialne podpore tem silam, kar jim bo omogočilo učinkovito podporo izvajanju darfurskega mirovnega sporazuma;
Notes the extension of the mandate of AMIS until the end of 2006; stresses the urgent need to reinforce the mandate and tasks of this force and to ensure sufficient financing as well as logistical and material support for it, allowing it to effectively assist in the implementation of the DPA;
poziva EU in druge mednarodne akterje, naj sodelujejo z ZN in Afriško unijo, da mirovnim silam zagotovijo možnost hitrega odziva na kršitve prekinitve ognja ali izzivanje katere koli strani;
Calls on the EU and other international actors to work specifically with the UN and the AU to ensure that peacekeeping forces in Darfur have the capability to react rapidly to ceasefire violations or provocations by any party;
poziva vse strani, še posebej sudansko vlado, naj zagotovijo popoln, varen in neoviran dostop reševalnega osebja do pomoči potrebnih v Darfurju in dostavo humanitarne pomoči, zlasti do notranje razseljenih oseb in beguncev;
Calls upon all parties, in particular the Government of Sudan, to ensure the full, safe and unhindered access of relief personnel to all those in need in Darfur as well as the delivery of humanitarian assistance, in particular to internally displaced persons and refugees;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu ministrov AKP-EU, sudanski vladi, Afriški uniji in generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the ACP-EU Council of Ministers, the Government of Sudan, the African Union and the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o gospodarskih in trgovinskih odnosih Evropske unije z Indijo ( 2006/2034(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the EU's economic and trade relations with India ( 2006/2034(INI) )
ob upoštevanju skupnega akcijskega načrta o strateškem partnerstvu med Indijo in EU z dne 7. septembra 2005 in zlasti poglavja o razvoju trgovine in naložb,
having regard to the India-EU Strategic Partnership Joint Action Plan of 7 September 2005 and in particular the section on developing trade and investment,
ob upoštevanju sklepov 9. okrogle mize med Indijo in EU, ki je potekala od 18. do 20. septembra 2005 v mestu Hyderabad,
having regard to the conclusions of the 9th meeting of the India-EU round table in Hyderabad on 18-20 September 2005,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 13. oktobra 2005 o obetih za trgovinske odnose med EU in Kitajsko UL C 233 E, 28.9.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 13 October 2005 on prospects for trade relations between the EU and China OJ C 233 E, 28.9.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 29. septembra 2005 o odnosih med EU in Indijo: strateško partnerstvo UL C 227 E, 21.9.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 29 September 2005 on EU-India relations: A Strategic Partnership OJ C 227 E, 21.9.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepa Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS) in javnemu zdravju, sprejetega dne 29. novembra 2005,
having regard to the WTO decision on TRIPS and Public Health adopted on 29 November 2005,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma iz leta 2004 med Indijo in ZDA z naslovom "Naslednji korak do strateškega partnerstva" in ob upoštevanju dogovora o uporabi jedrske energije v civilne namene, sprejetega med uradnim obiskom predsednika Busha v Indiji dne 2. marca 2006,
having regard to the 2004 India-US Agreement: "The Next Step Towards a Strategic Partnership" and the Civil Nuclear Deal negotiated during President George W. Bush's State Visit to India on 2 March 2006,
ob upoštevanju srečanja na vrhu med EU in Indijo, ki je potekalo dne 6. aprila 2006 v New Delhiju,
having regard to the EU-India Energy Summit held in New Delhi on 6 April 2006,
ob upoštevanju obiska delegacije Evropskega parlamenta za odnose z južnoazijskimi državami in z Združenjem držav južne Azije za regionalno sodelovanje (SAARC) aprila 2006 v New Delhiju in pokrajini Pandžab,
having regard to the visit to New Delhi and the Punjab by the European Parliament Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia and the South Asia Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) in April 2006,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ter mnenja Odbora za razvoj ( A6-0256/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development ( A6-0256/2006 ),
ker sta EU in Indija največji demokraciji na svetu in njuna ustavna zaveza k pluralizmu in pravni državi spodbuja doslednost v trgovinskih in gospodarskih odnosih, omogoča pravno varnost naložb ter prispeva k svetovni stabilnosti,
whereas the EU and India constitute the biggest democracies in the world and their constitutional commitment to pluralism and the rule of law promotes consistency in trade and economic relations, while providing legal certainty for investment and contributing to regional and global stability,
ker skupni akcijski načrt vsebuje širok razpon dejavnosti, ki jih je treba izvesti v okviru dialoga in sodelovanja na področju trgovinskih in gospodarskih ukrepov, vendar ne določa prednostnih nalog in rokov,
whereas the Joint Action Plan contains a comprehensive range of activities to be undertaken within the framework of trade and economic policy dialogue and cooperation, but whereas it fails to set priorities and deadlines,
ker je EU glavni vir indijskih tujih neposrednih naložb, pri čemer odlivi leta 2004 znašajo 1 100 milijonov EUR, in ker so se prilivi indijskih neposrednih tujih naložb v EU s 140 milijonov EUR v letu 2002 povečali na 600 milijonov EUR v letu 2003,
whereas the EU is India's largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) with outflows amounting to EUR 1 100 million in 2004, and whereas India's FDI inflows into the EU increased from EUR 140 million in 2002 to EUR 600 million in 2003,
ker indijski izvoz v države članice EU znaša 22,4 %, uvoz pa 20,8 % ter ker se je trgovinska menjava med EU in Indijo od leta 1980 do 2004 povečala s 4 400 milijonov EUR na 33 200 milijonov EUR oziroma za 16,9 % med letoma 2003 in 2004,
whereas EU Member States account for 22.4% of India's exports and 20.8% of imports and whereas EU-India trade grew from EUR 4 400 million to EUR 33 200 million between 1980 and 2004 and by 16.9% from 2003 to 2004,
ker je med relativnima ravnema trgovine med EU in Indijo veliko neravnovesje; ker Indija ustvari 21 % trgovinske menjave z EU, Indija pa manj kot 1 % trgovine EU; ker je EU največja indijska trgovinska partnerica, Indija pa je na seznamu EU le na 10. mestu,
whereas there is a stark imbalance in relative levels of trade between the EU and India; whereas the EU accounts for 21% of India's trade but India's share in EU trade is less than 1%; whereas the EU is India's largest trading partner but India ranks only 10th in the EU's comparable list,
ker je bila indijska gospodarska rast v zadnjem desetletju v povprečju višja za 6 % letno in ker lahko v naslednjem desetletju še naprej raste za 7 do 8 % letno,
whereas India's economy has grown by an average of 6% per annum in the last decade and whereas it could continue to grow by 7-8% in the next decade,
ker neučinkovit finančni sektor ovira ohranjanje 8 % gospodarske rasti v Indiji,
whereas an inefficient financial sector is an obstacle to India maintaining an 8% rate of economic growth,
ker je Indija zaradi svoje velikosti, prebivalstva in dinamične gospodarske rasti v zadnjih dveh desetletjih rastoča regionalna sila in ena od svetovnih jedrskih sil, ki lahko vpliva na svetovno gospodarstvo in varnost, kar daje Indiji večjo odgovornost v mednarodnih forumih, kot so Združeni narodi, Svetovna trgovinska organizacija ali Mednarodna agencija za jedrsko energijo, in v regionalnih organizacijah v Aziji, zlasti SAARC in ASEAN,
whereas, due to its size, population and dynamic economic growth in the past two decades, India is an emerging regional power and one of the world's nuclear powers able to influence the course of the global economy and security, giving India greater responsibility in multilateral fora such as the United Nations, the World Trade Organization or the International Atomic Energy Agency, and within regional organisations in Asia, notably SAARC and ASEAN,
ker je širitev Indije ugodna priložnost, ki kljub vsemu zbuja tudi upravičeno skrb za nekatere industrijske sektorje EU, kar povečuje potrebo po političnem upravljanju in sodelovanju pri gospodarskem in trgovinskem upravljanju njenega izvoza na ravni EU,
whereas Indian expansion brings beneficial opportunities but also raises legitimate concerns for some sectors of EU industry, raising the need for political management and cooperation for the economic and commercial management of its exports at the EU level,
ker bo imela Indija leta 2025 1,4 milijarde prebivalcev in bo dosegla Kitajsko kot državo z največ prebivalci na svetu, če se ohrani trenutna raven rasti prebivalstva, ki znaša 2 %,
whereas if the current population growth rate of 2% is maintained, in 2025 India will have a population of 1.4 billion and will challenge China as the most populated country in the world,