natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se sklicuje na pozitiven prispevek, ki ga lahko Evropski parlament kot proračunski organ ponudi pri obravnavanju vprašanj skupne varnosti o neširjenju orožja in razoroževanju, kar je očitno že iz njegove podpore za programe jedrske varnosti v skladu s projektom TACIS;
Recalls the positive contribution that can be made by the European Parliament in addressing common security concerns on non-proliferation and disarmament in its capacity as a budgetary authority, as already shown in its support for nuclear safety and nuclear security programmes under TACIS;
ponovno zahteva moratorij – z namenom uvedbe popolne prepovedi – na uporabo tako imenovanega "streliva iz osiromašenega urana";
Reiterates its call for a moratorium - with a view to the introduction of a total ban - on the use of so-called "depleted uranium munitions";
ponovno opozarja na pozitivni prispevek, ki ga Evropski parlament še naprej daje v primeru drugega pilotnega projekta (2005), pri čemer je bilo 1,5 milijona EUR dodeljenih v okviru Komisije za začetek pobude EU za sodelovanje pri nadzoru izvoza; opozarja na svojo odločitev, da bo še naprej podpiral takšne dejavnosti s financiranjem tretjega pripravljalnega ukrepa v letu 2006, ki omogoča Komisiji, da še naprej pripravlja pogoje za prihodnje programe, ki jih financira Skupnost, v skladu z novo finančno perspektivo 2007-2013;
Recalls equally the positive contribution that the European Parliament has continued to make in the case of the second Pilot Project (2005), whereby EUR 1.5 million has been allocated for use by the Commission to launch an EU Export Control Cooperation Initiative; recalls its decision to continue supporting such actions with the financing in 2006 of a third Preparatory Action enabling the Commission to further prepare the ground for future Community-funded programmes under the new Financial Perspectives 2007-2013;
opozarja na vlogo, ki jo ima Parlament v okviru svoje zakonodajne pristojnosti soodločanja in kot proračunski organ pri vprašanjih, kot je predlagan instrument stabilnosti, ki bi moral v skladu z instrumentom za jedrsko varnost vključevati nadzor izvoza in varnost na mejah, podporo uničevanju kemičnega orožja in odstranjevanje cepljivih snovi, ki se uporabljajo pri proizvodnji orožja, upravljanje in nadzor radioaktivnih in jedrskih snovi, biološko varnost, uporabo strokovnega znanja o orožju v druge namene itd.;
Recalls the role that Parliament plays in its codecision legislative capacity and as a budgetary authority in issues such as the proposed Stability Instrument, which should include export controls and border security, support for chemical weapons destruction and weapons-grade fissile material elimination, radioactive and nuclear material management and control, bio-security, conversion of former weapons expertise, etc., in coordination with a Nuclear Safety Instrument, export controls, etc.;
nadalje opozarja na svojo prisotnost prek privolitve pri najpomembnejših mednarodnih sporazumih Unije s tretjimi državami in zlasti tistih sporazumih, ki vključujejo klavzulo o neširjenju; v zvezi s tem opozarja na podporo, ki jo zahteva Parlament za vse tiste pobude, ki nasprotujejo širjenju v nekaterih državah in v zameno ponujajo sodelovanje ali kakršen koli mednarodni sporazum ali partnerstvo;
Further recalls its involvement via assent in the Union's most important international agreements with third countries, and in particular those agreements which include a non-proliferation clause; recalls in that connection the support required from Parliament for all those initiatives designed to counter proliferation in certain countries by offering cooperation in return, and for any other kind of international agreement or partnership;
zato zahteva, da Evropski parlament popolnoma sodeluje v vseh pobudah, katerih cilj je izvajanje strategije EU o OMU;
Asks therefore that the European Parliament be fully associated with all initiatives aimed at implementing the EU WMD Strategy;
priporoča, da se uradna delegacija Parlamenta udeleži naslednje konference o pregledu NPT in konference o pregledu BTWC;
Recommends that an official Parliament delegation attend the next NPT Review Conference as well as the BTWC Review Conference;
poziva države članice in Svet, naj v delegacijo Unije vključijo poslance Evropskega parlamenta na katerem koli prihodnjem vzajemnem pregledu nadzorov izvoza; poziva tudi Svet in Komisijo, naj redno obveščata Parlament o vlogi EU v Avstralski skupini, Režimu kontrole raketne tehnologije, Waasenaarskem sporazumu in Skupini držav dobaviteljic jedrskega blaga (NSG);
Calls on the Member States and the Council to include Members of the European Parliament in the Union's delegation at any future peer review on export controls; also calls on the Council and the Commission to keep Parliament regularly informed about the EU's role at the Australia Group, the MTCR, the Wassenaar Arrangement and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG);
predlaga, da se letno sprejme poročilo o statusu dejavnosti Evropske unije v zvezi z neširjenjem, ki vsebuje ustrezna politična priporočila;
Proposes to adopt annually a report on the status of non-proliferation activities of the European Union containing relevant policy recommendations;
Finančni vidiki strategije Evropske unije proti širjenju OMU
Financial aspects of the European Union strategy against the proliferation of WMD
poziva države članice, naj določijo ustrezna finančna sredstva za izvajanje prednostnih nalog, ki so navedene v poročilu o napredku Urada osebnega predstavnika;
Calls on the Member States to assign adequate financial resources to implement the priorities listed in the progress report by the OPR;
poziva Komisijo, naj na pregleden in jasen način določi sredstva, ki jih je že namenila "jedrski varnosti" in "neširjenju OMU";
Calls on the Commission to set out in a transparent and clear manner the resources it has already committed for both "nuclear safety" and "WMD non-proliferation";
poziva Komisijo, naj na pregleden in jasen način predstavi sredstva, potrebna za nujen prispevek Skupnosti k strategiji EU o OMU v letu 2006, in v skladu z novo finančno perspektivo 2007-2013, pri čemer jasno loči med poglavjema "jedrska varnost" in "neširjenje OMU";
Calls on the Commission to present in a transparent and clear manner the resources needed for the necessary Community contribution to the EU WMD Strategy during 2006 and under the new Financial Perspectives 2007-2013, making a clear distinction between "nuclear safety" and "WMD non-proliferation" headings;
v ta namen poziva Komisijo, naj določi seznam prednostnih nalog in oceni stroške za dejavnosti, potrebne za izpolnjevanje svoje obveznosti v okviru globalnega partnerstva G8, in za razširitev svojih dejavnosti zunaj držav SND za izpolnitev globalnih potreb;
To that end, calls on the Commission to set out a list of priorities and estimated costs for the actions necessary to meet its commitment in the framework of the G8 Global Partnership, and for extending its action beyond the CIS to meet global needs;
poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, naj podprejo posebne projekte, ki jih izvajajo večstranske institucije, kot sta IAEA in OPCW, ter po potrebi zagotovijo financiranje;
Calls on the Council, the Commission and the Member States to support specific projects conducted by multilateral institutions, such as the IAEA and the OPCW, and to provide financing where appropriate;
poziva zlasti države članice, naj zagotovijo finančna sredstva glede na seznam prednostnih nalog Urada osebnega predstavnika za nadzore izvoza in programe tehnične pomoči;
Calls in particular on the Member States to provide finance regarding the list of priorities of the OPR for export controls and technical assistance programmes;
meni, da se preprečevanje konfliktov in krizno upravljanje ne smeta financirati na račun proračuna za preprečevanje OMU in da visoki cilji, ki so izraženi v strategiji o OMU in jih podpirajo vse evropske institucije in države članice, zahtevajo ustrezno stopnjo financiranja; v zvezi s tem opozarja na naraščajoče težave pri financiranju nedavnih pobud (posebno podaljšanja skupnih ukrepov z OPCW in novega skupnega ukrepa v podporo BTWC) iz proračuna SZVP ali instrumentov Skupnosti;
Is of the view that conflict prevention and crisis management should not be financed at the expense of the WMD prevention budget, and that the high-level ambitions expressed in the WMD Strategy and supported by all the European institutions and Member States require an adequate level of financing; recalls in this connection the increasing difficulties in funding recent initiatives (specifically the renewal of the Joint Action with the OPCW and a new Joint Action in support of the BTWC) from the CFSP budget or Community instruments;
zato v okviru razprav o finančni perspektivi 2007-2013 predlaga pregled obstoječega Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 6. maja 1999 in vključitev posebne proračunske postavke v proračun Unije za financiranje vseh dejavnosti v zvezi z vprašanji OMU, ne glede na to, ali spadajo v okvir Skupnosti ali SZVP, ob upoštevanju posameznega procesa odločanja ter pristojnosti Sveta, Komisije in osebnega predstavnika;
In the framework of the discussions on the Financial Perspectives 2007-2013, proposes therefore a review of the existing Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 and the establishment of a specific budget line within the Union's budget to finance all activities regarding WMD issues, irrespective of whether they fall within the Community or CFSP framework, whilst respecting their respective decision-making processes as well as the competences of the Council, the Commission and the Personal Representative;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje sedanjemu predsedstvu Sveta, Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, generalnemu sekretarju Organizacije združenih narodov, vladam in parlamentom Združenih držav, Rusije, Kitajske, Izraela, Indije, Pakistana, Irana in Severne Koreje ter vsem drugim državam pogodbenicam NPT in članicam IAEA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Presidency-in-office of the Council, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Secretary-General, the governments and parliaments of the United States, Russia, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea, and all other States party to the NPT and members of the IAEA.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Zeleni knjigi o javnih naročilih za obrambo ( 2005/2030(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the Green Paper on defence procurement ( 2005/2030(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 95 in 296 Pogodbe,
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 95 and 296 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2004/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 31. marca 2004 o usklajevanju postopkov za oddajo javnih naročil gradenj, blaga in storitev UL L 134, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča Zlasti sodb v Zadevi C-222/84
having regard to the case law of the Court of Justice In particular the judgments in Case C-222/84
[1986] ECR 1651 in v Zadevi C-414/97
[1986] ECR 1651 and Case C-414/97
[1999] ECR I-5585.
[1999] ECR I-5585.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in zaščito potrošnikov in mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A6-0288/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A6-0288/2005 ),
ker člen 296 Pogodbe predvideva odstopanje za zaščito bistvenih interesov nacionalne varnosti v zvezi s proizvodnjo ali prodajo orožja, streliva in vojaškega materiala in ker je ta člen pogosto zlorabljen, čeprav določa, da ukrepi, sprejeti v skladu z odstopanjem, ne smejo negativno vplivati na konkurenčne pogoje na skupnem trgu v zvezi s proizvodi, ki niso izrecno predvideni v vojaške namene,
whereas Article 296 of the Treaty provides a derogation for the protection of the essential interests of national security which are connected with the production of or trade in arms, munitions and war material, and, although that Article also provides that measures taken pursuant to that derogation shall not adversely affect the conditions of competition in the common market regarding products which are not intended for specifically military purposes, it is often misused,
ker člen 10 Direktive 2004/18/ES predvideva, da se ob upoštevanju člena 296 ta direktiva uporablja za oddajanje javnih naročil na področju obrambe,
whereas Article 10 of Directive 2004/18/EC provides that, subject to Article 296, that Directive applies to contracts awarded in the field of defence,
ker Sodišče meni, da člen 296 ne predstavlja splošnega in samodejnega odstopanja, da mora biti njegova uporaba upravičena za vsak primer posebej, da je poseganje po tem členu upravičeno le, če je potrebno za doseganje cilja zaščite interesov varnosti in da mora dokazno breme nositi zadevna država članica,
whereas the Court of Justice has held that Article 296 does not amount to a general, automatic derogation, that its use must be justified on a case-by-case basis, that recourse to it is justified only if it is necessary for achieving the objective of safeguarding the relevant security interests involved and that the burden of proof must be discharged by the Member State concerned,
ob upoštevanju gospodarskega pomena javnih naročil za obrambo na evropskem notranjem trgu, proračunskih težav držav članic, omejitve proračunske porabe, ki jo morajo države članice uvesti, in precejšnje obremenitve davkoplačevalcev zaradi obrambnih izdatkov,
taking account of the economic importance of defence procurement within the internal market, the tight budgetary position in the Member States, the restriction in terms of budgetary expenditure imposed on the Member States and the considerable burden which defence expenditure places on taxpayers,
ob upoštevanju posebnosti trgov oboroževanja, zlasti odločilne vloge držav, pomena varnosti pri javnih naročilih za obrambno opremo in posebnosti nepopolnih tržnih struktur, na primer omejenega števila ponudnikov in povpraševanj ter celo monopolov,
conscious of the specific features of defence markets, in particular with regard to the dominant role of the state, the importance of armaments procurement in terms of security and the particularly fragmented structure of such markets, as evidenced for example by the very limited number of suppliers and purchasers, extending even to monopolies,
ker je razdrobljenost trga oboroževanja v Evropi tudi razlog za šibkost evropskih vojaških zmogljivosti,
whereas the fragmented nature of the armaments market in Europe is one of the causes of weakness of Europe's military capabilities,
ker je nepredušna segregacija trgov oboroževanja tudi razlog za pomanjkljivo standardizacijo, ki je povzročila pomanjkanje povezljivosti sistemov v Evropi in s tem otežila sodelovanje pri mednarodnih operacijah,
whereas the hermetic segregation of armaments markets is also the cause of a lack of standardisation and has led to a lack of interoperability between systems in Europe and made cooperation in international operations more difficult,
ker veljavnost 25 različnih sklopov predpisov o javnih naročilih predstavlja oviro za uresničitev evropskega akcijskega načrta o zmogljivostih,
whereas the fact that 25 different sets of rules on procurement are in force constitutes an obstacle to implementation of the European Capabilities Action Plan (ECAP),
ker v najpomembnejši krog kupcev vojaške opreme sodijo izključno vlade 25 držav članic, pri čemer jih šest od njih kupi 90 % opreme in so v nekaterih primerih tudi same udeležene v oboroževalni industriji,
whereas relevant armaments purchasers are solely the governments of the 25 Member States, six of which account for 90% of armaments purchases and in some cases even hold stakes in the armaments industry,
pozdravlja Zeleno knjigo, ki jo je Komisija predstavila dne 23. septembra 2004 ( KOM(2004)0608 ), in podpira Komisijo pri njenih prizadevanjih "za prispevek k postopni izgradnji evropskega obrambnega trga, ki bo med državami članicami bolj pregleden in odprt ter bo ob upoštevanju posebnosti tega področja povečal gospodarsko učinkovitost", kakor tudi konkurenčnost in skupno varnost vseh držav članic Evropske unije;
Welcomes the Green Paper presented by the Commission on 23 September 2004 ( COM(2004)0608 ) and encourages the Commission in its efforts to "contribute to the gradual creation of a European defence equipment market ... which is more transparent and open between Member States and which, whilst respecting the sector's specific nature, would increase economic efficiency", as well as competitiveness and common security in all Member States;
poziva države članice in industrijo, da opustijo desetletja trajajoče pridržke v zvezi z evropskim obrambnim trgom in vstopijo v novo fazo sodelovanja z inovativno strategijo;
Calls on the Member States and the industry to abandon the reservations which for decades have stood in the way of a European defence market and to set in train a new phase of cooperation based on an innovative strategy;
soglaša s Komisijo, da je evropski obrambni trg potreben zaradi zmanjšanja vojaških izdatkov in večje stroškovne učinkovitosti proizvodnje vojaške opreme v interesu evropskih davkoplačevalcev;
Agrees with the Commission that a European defence market is necessary for the reduction of military expenditure costs and in order to make the production of military goods more cost-effective, in the interests of the European taxpayer;
poudarja potrebo, da zlasti zaradi večje učinkovitosti evropske oboroževalne industrije ne gre postavljati pod vprašaj vlogo Unije kot "civilne moči";
Stresses the need, particularly in the context of a more efficient European armaments industry, not to bring into doubt the Union's role as a civil power;
poudarja, da mora biti večja storilnost industrije v prid zaščiti evropskih vojakov pri posredovanjih kot tudi evropskim državljanom;
Emphasises that the increased efficiency of the industry should serve to protect European soldiers in action and benefit European citizens;
opozarja, da je treba na ravni EU storiti vse za večjo usklajenost in standardizacijo s sprejetimi standardi povezljivosti in sodelovanja zveze NATO na področju javnih naročil za obrambo v skladu s specifičnimi potrebami evropske varnostne in obrambne politike ter da bi medtem moralo biti premagovanje pomanjkljivosti evropskega akcijskega načrta o zmogljivostih (ECAP) prednostna naloga vseh držav članic;
Points out that every effort must be made at EU level to increase harmonisation and standardisation in defence procurement matters in accordance with accepted NATO standards of interoperability and specific European Security and Defence Policy needs and that, in the process, overcoming ECAP shortfalls should be seen as a priority by all Member States;
soglaša s Komisijo glede izvajanja pritiska na nacionalne agencije za javna naročila za obrambo, da bi spremenile prakso splošnega odstopanja v skladu s členom 296, in glede sprejetja ukrepov, ki bodo zagotovili, da bodo javna naročila za obrambo v večji meri urejena s predpisi Evropske skupnosti in ne z nacionalno zakonodajo;
Agrees with the Commission that pressure should be placed on national defence procurement agencies to alter the general practice of taking advantage of the derogation contained in Article 296 and to take measures to ensure that defence procurement is covered to a larger extent by Community legislation rather than by national legislation;
meni, da bi morala Komisija sprejeti razlago, ki bi odražala njeno odločenost, da odpravi zlorabe člena 296, vzporedno s tem pa začeti s pripravo nove direktive, prilagojene posebnostim obrambe za namene javnih naročil za orožje, strelivo in vojaški material, ob upoštevanju člena 296;
Believes that the Commission should both adopt an interpretative Communication reflecting its determination to stop the misuse of Article 296 and start to develop, in parallel, a new directive, tailored to the specific features of defence, for the purposes of the procurement of arms, ammunition and war material subject to Article 296;
meni, da bi moralo razlagalno sporočilo razložiti uporabo člena 296 na podlagi ustrezne sodne prakse Sodišča, zlasti pa bi moralo jasno opredeliti skupine proizvodov in korake pri postopku javnega naročanja vojaške opreme, za katere velja odstopanje, in obseg bistvenih varnostnih interesov;
Considers that the interpretative Communication should explain the application of Article 296 on the basis of the relevant case law of the Court of Justice, and in particular should clarify the product groups and steps in the armaments procurement procedure that are covered by the derogation and the scope of essential security interests;
meni, da je spričo že obstoječe medsebojne odvisnosti držav članic na področjih, kot so monetarne zadeve ali energija, primerna restriktivna razlaga interesov nacionalne varnosti; se sprašuje, v kakšnem obsegu je danes sploh še mogoče smiselno razmejiti nacionalne od skupnih evropskih interesov varnosti;
Regards a restrictive interpretation of national security interests as appropriate, given that Member States are already mutually dependent in areas such as monetary affairs and energy; questions to what extent any meaningful distinction at all can still be drawn between national and common European security interests;
si lahko spričo dejstva, da je mogoče člen 296 spremeniti zgolj s spremembo Pogodbe, predstavlja, da bi imele države članice lastno dolžnost sklicevati se na odstopanje le v omejenih posameznih primerih; hkrati pozdravlja dejstvo, da je industrija privolila v sodelovanje pri pripravi pravil o ravnanju za javna naročila na področju obrambne opreme;
Could conceive, given that Article 296 can be revised only by amending the Treaty, of a self-imposed obligation on the part of Member States to invoke derogations in limited individual cases; at the same time welcomes the industry's commitment to playing a part in the development of a code of conduct for defence procurement;
se zaveda, da so konvencionalne direktive o javnih naročilih na področju obrambe primerne le v določeni meri;
Is aware of the limited suitability of conventional public procurement directives for armaments procurement because of that area's specific features;
glede nove direktive meni, da je treba pretehtati tako obvezne kot neobvezne instrumente v zvezi s postopkom javnega naročanja; meni, da je treba dati poudarek povečanju preglednosti in pravičnosti pri oddaji naročil; opozarja, da je treba poleg dejanske nabave blaga upoštevati tudi druge vidike, kot so raziskave in razvoj, sporazumi o nadomestilih, vzdrževanje, popravila, dodatno opremljanje in usposabljanje;
Believes that, with regard to a new directive, both mandatory and optional instruments could be considered in connection with procurement procedures; considers that the emphasis should be placed on creating greater transparency and fairness in the award of contracts; points out that, in addition to the actual acquisition of equipment, other aspects will need to be taken into account, such as research and development, offsetting agreements, maintenance, repair, retrofitting and training;
meni, da je v takih postopkih za oddajo javnih naročil bistvena možnost pogajanj, zlasti kadar ne gre za standardne izdelke;
Regards the possibility of negotiations in procurement procedures as essential, particularly where standard products are not involved;
meni, da se je treba pri pripravi direktive intenzivno posvetovati z vpletenimi stranmi in že zdaj opozarja na potrebo po študiji vpliva na podjetja ter študiji vpliva na zunanje odnose;
Believes that there must be intensive consultation with stakeholders in drawing up a directive, and stresses the need for a business impact study and a foreign-relations impact study;