natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi moralo biti usposabljanje na področju vključevanja okolja za uradnike na delovnih mestih v ključnih sektorjih obvezno; poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej zaključi s pripravo priročnika o vključevanju okolja;
Believes that training in environmental mainstreaming should be compulsory for key officials; urges the Commission to complete the preparation of a manual on environmental mainstreaming as soon as possible;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo ustrezno notranje znanje in izkušnje o okolju ter jasni postopki vključevanja okolja opredeljeni in se bodo upoštevali;
Asks the Commission to ensure that it has sufficient in-house environmental expertise and that clear environmental integration procedures are both defined and complied with;
poziva Komisijo, naj širše uporablja priznano znanje in izkušnje upravljanja nacionalnih pomoči držav članic in zasebnih podjetij, ki imajo vpeljane izkušnje kot partnerji upravljanja nacionalnih pomoči pri vodenju okoljskih projektov v okviru nacionalnih razvojnih programov;
Invites the Commission to make greater use of the recognised expertise of the national aid administrations of the Member States and of private companies that have an established experience as partners of the national aid administrations in managing environmental projects in the context of national development cooperation programmes;
vztraja, da se morajo projekti načrtovati na podlagi podrobnih specifikacij z jasno določenimi cilji, da se zaposli zunanje opazovalce za vrednotenje stopnje uspešnosti posameznega projekta in se jasno opredeli posamezne napake ali pomanjkljivosti;
Insists that projects must be planned on the basis of detailed specifications with clearly defined aims and that external monitors should be engaged to evaluate the success rate of each project and to identify clearly any failures or weaknesses;
pozdravlja objavo poročila in odločno poziva Komisijo, da zlasti pri odobravanju nacionalnih programov upošteva pomanjkljivosti, ki so opredeljene v poročilu in niso obravnavane v novi Uredbi za razvoj podeželja ali v podrobnih pravilih o uporabi;
Welcomes the publication of the report and urges the Commission to take on board those shortcomings identified in the report which are not addressed in the new Rural Development Regulation or its detailed implementation rules, in particular when approving national programmes;
meni, da bi nekoliko daljši časovni okvir Komisije za odobritev nacionalnih programov lahko prispeval k natančnejši analizi teh programov, saj bo kakovost nacionalnih programov pomembno vplivala na to, ali je dodeljevanje sredstev upravičencem in območjem, ki pomoč najbolj potrebujejo, nedvomno upravičeno, ter na merjenje učinkovitosti naložbenih ukrepov v prihodnje;
Believes that the time-frame for Commission approval of national programmes might have to be extended slightly in order to allow for thorough analysis, as the quality of national programmes will to a large extent determine whether the allocation of funds to the most needy areas and beneficiaries is clearly justified and the effectiveness of investment measures can be better measured in the future;
ponovno poudarja, da pripisuje velik pomen učinkoviti in odgovorni porabi proračuna EU ter spoštovanju načela, da se z javnimi sredstvi ne sme financirati pobud, ki jih ni mogoče ustrezno preveriti; meni, da je v tem okviru ključnega pomena, da se v nacionalnih programih določijo jasni cilji in oblikujejo jasne strategije;
Reiterates the importance it attaches to an efficient and responsible use of the EU budget and to the application of the principle that an initiative that is insufficiently verifiable should not be financed by public money; considers that setting clear objectives and defining clear strategies in national programmes are essential in this context;
meni, da bi se doseganje dvojne razsežnosti (strukturne in kmetijske) ciljev naložbenih ukrepov moralo izvajati z natančno uravnoteženim področnim (za kmetijstvo) in ozemeljskim pristopom (za gospodarsko in socialno kohezijo);
Believes that the achievement of the two-fold structural and agricultural objectives of investment measures should be implemented through a carefully balanced sectoral (for agriculture) and territorial (for economic and social cohesion) approach;
ker je drugi steber SKP nepogrešljivo orodje za nadaljnji razvoj podeželskih območij v EU, poziva Komisijo, da spodbudi države članice k preučitvi ključnih dejavnikov za uspeh naložbenih projektov in k razširjanju primerov dobre prakse;
Considers the second pillar of the CAP to be an indispensable tool in the further development of rural areas in the EU, and thus invites the Commission to encourage Member States to analyse key success factors in investment projects and to disseminate cases of good practice;
spodbuja Komisijo, da ob tesnem sodelovanju z državami članicami izboljša sisteme za spremljanje in ocenjevanje, na primer z razvojem ustreznih kazalcev kakovosti, ki bodo državam članicam in Komisiji omogočili, da ocenijo, ali so bili ukrepi učinkoviti in kateri cilji so bili doseženi;
Encourages the Commission, in close cooperation with Member States, to improve monitoring and evaluation systems, for example by developing relevant qualitative indicators that enable Member States and Commission to determine whether measures were effective and which objectives were achieved;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je razprava o tem posebnem poročilu potekala istočasno kot prva uvodna predstavitev predloga Komisije o reformi v sektorju sadja in zelenjave, ki naj bi začel veljati od leta 2008 dalje;
Welcomes the fact that the discussion of this special report took place at the same time as the first introductory presentation of the Commission's proposal for reform of the fruit and vegetable sector, to take effect from 2008;
Posebno poročilo št. 8/2006 "Uspešna rast?
Special Report No 8/2006 on: Growing Success?
Uspešnost podpore Evropske unije za proizvajalce sadja in zelenjave"
The effectiveness of the European Union support for fruit and vegetable producers
ponovno poudarja svojo zavezanost podpori Skupnosti za sektor sadja in zelenjave v EU, ki je potrebna, da bi postal bolj trajnostno usmerjen in konkurenčen;
Reiterates its commitment to Community support for the fruit and vegetables sector in the EU, which is needed to make the sector more sustainable and more competitive;
poudarja, da so organizacije proizvajalcev temelj skupne ureditve trga za sadje in zelenjavo, zato podpira Komisijo, ki spodbuja in podpira pridelovalce, da vzpostavijo organizacije proizvajalcev;
Stresses that producer organisations are the cornerstone of the CMO for fruit and vegetable products, and therefore supports the Commission when it encourages and supports growers to form producer organisations;
izraža svojo podporo odpravljanju intervencijskih ukrepov, kot sta npr. umik ali podpora predelanih proizvodov, ker meni, da nasprotujejo ciljem sektorja sadja in zelenjave;
Expresses its support for moving away from interventionist measures, such as withdrawals or support for processed products, which it considers to be counterproductive to the objectives set out for the fruit and vegetable sector;
meni, da so sistemi podpore za operativne programe za organizacije proizvajalcev sadja in zelenjave, ki so naravnani proti intervencijskim ukrepom, veliko obetavnejši;
Believes that support systems for operational programmes for fruit and vegetable producer organisations form a far more promising tool than interventionist measures;
je seznanjen z ocenjevalno študijo, predvideno v letu 2009, in jo pozdravlja ter poziva Komisijo, da za sektor sadja in zelenjave vzpostavi ustrezen mehanizem za spremljanje in nadzor, ki bo zagotavljal spoštovanje načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja;
Notes and welcomes the evaluation study foreseen for 2009 and calls for the Commission to set up an appropriate monitoring and control mechanism for the fruit and vegetable sector to ensure compliance with the principle of sound financial management;
pozdravlja izjavo Komisije, da bo izboljšala svoje zmožnosti za zbiranje podatkov in razvila ustrezne kazalnike kakovosti ter količinske kazalnike za opredelitev uspešnosti in učinkovitosti; meni, da bi ti kazalniki morali bolje obravnavati celovitejše koristi programov, ki bi jih morali spremljati na višji agregacijski ravni; nadalje predlaga, naj Komisija čim prej pregleda ustreznost in natančnost obstoječih kazalnikov in statistik;
Welcomes the Commission's statement that it will improve its capacity to collect data and to develop relevant qualitative and quantitative indicators in order to measure effectiveness and efficiency; believes that these indicators should better address a wider range of benefits of programmes, which should be monitored at a higher aggregation level; proposes, moreover, that the Commission review as soon as possible the relevance and accurateness of existing indicators and statistics;
se strinja s Sodiščem, da je treba obstoječi sistem natančno pregledati zaradi izboljšanja njegove učinkovitosti in uspešnosti; zato poziva Komisijo in države članice k natančnemu spremljanju ter povečanju učinkovitosti in uspešnosti sistema operativnih programov proizvajalcev, k preučevanju dejavnikov, ki so prispevali k uspešnejšim rezultatom, in na osnovi tega k pripravi zaključkov, ki bodo omogočili boljše izvajanje na ravni držav članic, zlasti v manj učinkovito organiziranih regijah;
Agrees with the Court that the current system needs close review in order to improve its efficiency and effectiveness; calls therefore on the Commission and the Member States to closely monitor and increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the system of producers' operational programmes and to study the success factors of the more promising results obtained and draw conclusions on that basis for better implementation at Member State level, especially in the less well organised regions;
zato zaradi povečanja preglednosti in zmanjšanja upravnih stroškov za plačilne programe podpira priporočila Sodišča, ki priporoča pojasnjevanje in poenostavljanje meril o upravičenosti;
Supports therefore the Court's recommendations to clarify and simplify eligibility criteria in order increase transparency and to reduce administrative costs incurred by payment schemes;
poziva Komisijo, da uskladi postopke za dodeljevanje pomoči in pravila s tistimi, ki veljajo za Sklad za razvoj podeželja, da bi razjasnili, kdaj se postopki in pravila lahko medsebojno dopolnjujejo in kdaj se izključujejo;
Asks the Commission to align the aid scheme's procedures and rules with those of the Rural Development Funds in order to clarify when they can complement each other and when they exclude each other;
poziva Komisijo, naj natančno spremlja in nadzira izvajanje programa v novih državah članicah;
Calls upon the Commission to closely monitor and control the implementation of the scheme in new Member States;
poudarja, da predstavljajo celotni stroški jezikovnih služb evropskih institucij za prevajanje in tolmačenje komaj 1 % celotnega proračuna EU;
Underlines the fact that the total cost of all the linguistic services of the EU institutions - translation and interpretation combined - represents merely 1% of the total EU budget;
je presenečen, da institucije do sedaj niso izračunale niti svojih celotnih stroškov prevajanja Sodišče je celotne stroške opredelilo kot vse stroške, povezane s prevajalci, tajniki, vodstvom, uslužbenci prevajalske službe, enoto za načrtovanje, poslopji, informacijsko tehnologijo in upravljanjem človeških virov (npr. usposabljanje).
Is surprised that institutions have so far calculated neither their total translation costs According to the Court these figures cover costs for translators, secretaries, management, service staff, planning, buildings, IT and human resource management (i.e. training).
niti svojih stroškov na stran; ugotavlja, da je v letu 2005 Komisija prevedla 1 324 000 strani (1 450 prevajalcev), Parlament 1 080 000 strani (550 prevajalcev) in Svet 475 000 strani (660 prevajalcev); nadalje ugotavlja, da je Sodišče izračunalo celotne stroške prevajanja v letu 2003 v višini 414 200 000 EUR, od tega 214 800 000 za Komisijo, 99 000 000 za Parlament in 100 400 000 za Svet; ugotavlja, da so v istem letu znašali povprečni stroški prevajanja na stran 166,37 EUR: 150,2 EUR za Komisijo, 149,7 EUR za Parlament in 251,8 EUR za Svet;
nor their costs per page; notes that, in 2005, the volume of translations was 1 324 000 pages at the Commission (1 450 translators), 1 080 000 pages at Parliament (550 translators) and 475 000 pages at the Council (660 translators); notes furthermore that the Court of Auditors estimated the full cost of translation, in 2003, at EUR 414 200 000, being EUR 214 800 000 for the Commission, EUR 99 000 000 for Parliament and EUR 100 400 000 for the Council; notes that for the same year the average cost per page stood at EUR 166,37: EUR 150,2 for the Commission, EUR 149,7 for Parliament, and EUR 251,8 for the Council;
meni, da bi morale institucije sprejeti ustrezne ukrepe za povečanje produktivnosti prevajalskih služb EU v primerjavi z zasebnim sektorjem;
Considers that the institutions should take appropriate measures to further improve the productivity of the EU translation services by comparison with the private sector;
zahteva pojasnilo, zakaj so cene svobodnih prevajalcev, ki opravljajo storitve za Parlament, v povprečju za 12 % višje od cen svobodnih prevajalcev Komisije;
Considers that clarifications are required as to why the prices that Parliament pays for freelance translators are on average 12% higher than the prices paid by the Commission;
pozdravlja, da sta po pridružitvi novih desetih držav članic Komisija in Svet uspela omejiti povečanje obsega prevajanja in tako preprečila povečanje stroškov;
Welcomes the fact that the Commission and the Council have managed to limit the increase in translation volume after the EU-10 enlargement, thereby curbing any cost increase;
meni, da bi morale vse tri institucije določiti stroške prevajanja na letni osnovi, pri čemer bi uporabile ista merila in načine izračuna; meni, da bilo treba tako izračunane podatke uporabiti ne le za proračunske namene, ampak tudi za osveščanje uporabnikov;
Considers that the three institutions should establish translation costs on an annual basis using the same criteria and calculation methods; takes the view that the figures obtained should be used not only for budgetary purposes, but also to raise cost awareness among users;
pozdravlja pripravljenost Komisije, da za leto 2006 preuči postopek odobritve in preverjanja zahtevkov za prevod; prav tako pozdravlja, da je Svet v letu 2003 uvedel seznam osrednjih dokumentov in tako omejil prevajanje drugih besedil;
Welcomes the Commission's readiness to address the authorisation procedure and the screening of translation requests in 2006; also welcomes the fact that, in 2003, the Council established a list of core documents, thereby limiting the translation of other texts;
priporoča, da se v večji meri omeji dolžina prevodov in pisnih povzetkov;
Recommends that greater use be made of limits on the length of documents and of written summaries;
spodbuja parlamentarne odbore in delegacije, da besedila zagotavljajo le v jezikih članov odbora in njihovih namestnikov; predlaga, da bi se lahko druge jezikovne različice zagotovile na posebno zahtevo;
Encourages parliamentary committees and delegations to provide texts only in the languages of committee members and their substitutes; suggests that additional language versions could be provided upon specific request;
na splošno meni, da morajo institucije sprejeti potrebne ukrepe za zagotavljanje visoke kakovosti prevodov; zato meni, da bi morali Svet, Parlament in Komisija pravočasno za postopek razrešnice za leto 2006 poročati Sodišču in Odboru za proračunski nadzor o ukrepih, ki so jih sprejeli za spremljanje in izboljšanje kakovosti prevodov;
Is generally of the opinion that the institutions must take the necessary measures to guarantee a high translation quality standard; takes the view, therefore, that the Council, Parliament and the Commission should report back to the Court and the Committee on Budgetary Control on measures taken to monitor and improve the quality of translations in time for the 2006 discharge procedure;
meni, da bi morale institucije še izboljšati informacije, ki so na voljo vodstvu za spremljanje prevajalskega procesa, in pri tem upoštevati kazalnike uspešnosti, ki jih predlaga Sodišče Glej točki 53 in 88 poročila Sodišča.
Considers that the institutions should improve further the information available to management for monitoring the translation process, taking into consideration the performance indicators proposed by the Court See paragraphs 53 and 88 of the Court's report.
meni, da bi morali Svet, Parlament in Komisija učinkovito in uspešno uporabljati notranje in zunanje vire, kot so podatkovne zbirke, računalniško podprto prevajanje, delo na daljavo in oddaja prevodov zunanjim izvajalcem;
Considers that the Council, Parliament and the Commission should make efficient and effective use of internal and external resources such as databases, computer-assisted translations, teleworking and outsourcing;
meni, da bi morala vsaka institucija pred oddajo prevodov zunanjim izvajalcem preveriti proste prevajalske zmogljivosti v drugih dveh institucijah;
Considers that each institution should verify spare translation capacities in the other two institutions before outsourcing translations;
predlaga, naj se glede skupnih točk metod vrednotenja poveča sodelovanje med GD REGIO in GD EMPL;
Suggests that cooperation between DG REGIO and DG EMPL be expanded with regard to the points which the evaluation methods have in common;
ugotavlja, da metodologija sedanje uporabe modela HERMIN povzroča velike težave; je zaskrbljen, ker sedanja metodologija za nekatera gospodarstva, na primer turizem, ne omogoča, da bi se dovolj upošteval pomen storitvenega sektorja; je zaskrbljen, da bodo zaradi posebnih okoliščin novih tržnih gospodarstev hude težave pri vrednotenju strukturnih skladov v državah, ki so postale članice Evropske unije v letu 2004; zahteva, naj Komisija pred začetkom vrednotenja proračunskega obdobja 2000–2006 dokaže, v kakšnem obsegu je spremenila metodologijo, da bi upoštevala to kritiko;
Notes that the methodology concerning the current use of the HERMIN model poses major problems; is concerned that the current methodology does not allow sufficient account to be taken of the importance of the tertiary sector for some economies, such as tourism; fears that there will be serious difficulties for Structural Fund evaluation in the countries which joined the European Union in 2004 because of the specific circumstances of their young market economies; calls on the Commission to demonstrate - before commencing the 2000-2006 evaluation - to what extent it has modified the methodology to take account of this criticism;
prav tako zahteva, naj se metodologiji dodajo dopolnila za merjenje mikroekonomskih učinkov; meni, da so zasebne naložbe pomembne za dolgoročni vpliv strukturnih skladov in za ustvarjanje delovnih mest; zahteva, naj se jih upošteva pri naknadnem izvajanju v obdobju 2000–2006;
Calls also for the methodology to be enlarged upon in order to gauge microeconomic effects; considers private investment important for Structural Fund impact in the long term and for job creation; insists that it be taken into consideration in the 2000-2006 ex post evaluation exercise;
v skrbi za zagotovitev skladnega pristopa zahteva, da se pri vrednotenju strukturnih skladov na splošno upoštevajo zaključki posebnega poročila Sodišča pri predhodnem, vmesnem in naknadnem vrednotenju programskih obdobij 2000–2006, 2007–2013 in naslednjih obdobij;
Calls, in the interests of ensuring a coherent approach to Structural Fund evaluation in general, for the conclusions of the Court's special report to be taken into account for future ex ante, mid-term and ex post evaluations for the 2000-2006, 2007-2013 and subsequent programming periods;
podpira zamisel, da bi bilo treba vrednotenje strukturnih skladov upoštevati kot stalen proces, ki se stalno oskrbuje z zaključki posameznih opravljenih predhodnih, vmesnih in naknadnih vrednotenj; zahteva, naj so pri vrednotenju v ta proces vključene države članice, in poziva Komisijo, naj v najkrajšem možnem času dokaže, kako bo te zamisli uresničila;
Backs the notion that Structural Fund evaluation ought to be viewed as an ongoing process with permanent input from the conclusions drawn from the various ex ante, mid-term and ex post exercises; calls for Member States to be involved in this process and for the Commission to demonstrate how it is going to put these notions into practice as soon as possible;
meni, da bi morala prihodnja ocenjevanja za ponazoritev evropske dodane vrednosti strukturnih skladov javnosti poudariti tudi posredne učinke strukturnih skladov;
Takes the view that, in the interests of demonstrating the European added value of the Structural Funds to the public, future evaluations should also highlight the indirect effects of the Structural Funds;
meni, da bi takšno sodelovanje omogočilo natančnejše ocenjevanje in v večji meri izkoristilo potencial strukturnih skladov; poziva Komisijo, da sledi temu pristopu in oblikuje model za ocenjevanje ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije, specifičen za Evropo, ki bi ga bilo mogoče uporabiti tudi v svetovnem merilu.
Is of the opinion that such cooperation would make it possible to refine the evaluation and exploit the potential of the Structural Funds to a greater extent; invites the Commission to follow this approach in order to establish a 'beacon' model for evaluation of economic, social and territorial cohesion measures which would be a specifically European model, but would have the potential to serve as an example at global level.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. aprila 2007 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005 ( C6-0465/2006 – 2006/2071(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section I – European Parliament ( C6-0465/2006 – 2006/2071(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2005 UL L 60, 8.3.2005.
having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005 OJ L 60, 8.3 2005.
ob upoštevanju letnih zaključnih računov evropskih skupnosti za proračunsko leto 2005 – Zvezek I ( SEK(2006)0915 − C6-0465/2006 ) UL C 264, 31.10.2006, str.
having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2005 - Volume I ( SEC(2006)0915 – C6-0465/2006 ) OJ C 264, 31.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila o upravljanju proračuna in finančnem poslovodenju za proračunsko leto 2005, oddelek 1 – Evropski parlament DV/614096EN.doc.
having regard to the Report on budgetary and financial management for the financial year 2005, Section I - European Parliament DV/614096EN.doc.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila notranjega revizorja za leto 2005,
having regard to the Internal Auditor's annual report for 2005,
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za proračunsko leto 2005, skupaj z odgovori institucij, UL C 263, 31.10.2006, str.
having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005, together with the institutions" replies OJ C 263, 31.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo predloži Računsko sodišče v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe o ES UL C 263, 31.10.2006, str.
having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty OJ C 263, 31.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 272(10) in 275 Pogodbe o ES ter člena 179a Pogodbe o Euratomu,
having regard to Articles 272(10) and 275 of the EC Treaty and Article 179a of the Euratom Treaty,