natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da bi bilo priporočljivo zahtevati informacije o sistemih drugih institucij za različne vrste prejemkov, nadomestil in potnih stroškov ter jih primerjati; poudarja, da sta preglednost in demokratična odgovornost očitno ključnega pomena;
Takes the view that it may be advisable to request information about, and to compare, the other institutions‘ systems for various types of remuneration, allowances and travel costs; points out that transparency and democratic accountability are obviously crucial;
želi nadaljnje ukrepanje v zvezi s prednostno nalogo iz preteklega leta, in sicer boljšo delitvijo razpoložljivih sredstev med institucijami, vključno s konkretnimi ukrepi, sprejetimi v zvezi s prevajanjem, in meni, da bi se v tej luči lahko ponovno obravnavalo tudi področje tolmačenja;
Wishes to follow up on last year's priority of better sharing of the available resources among all the institutions, including the concrete measures taken in the area of translation, and considers that the area of interpretation could also be looked at once again in this context;
poziva poročevalca za leto 2010, naj obišče Svet, Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti, Računsko sodišče, Ekonomsko-socialni odbor, Odbor regij, evropskega varuha človekovih pravic in evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov ter pridobi informacije še pred pripravo načrtov prihodkov in odhodkov, nato pa o tem poroča Odboru za proračun;
Invites its rapporteur for 2010 to carry out individual visits to the Council, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, in order to hear them before the estimates stage and to report back to its Committee on Budgets;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2010 o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: katera strategija je prava? ( 2009/2105(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2010 on Agricultural product quality policy: what strategy to follow? ( 2009/2105(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 28. maja 2009 o politiki kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov ( KOM(2009)0234 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission of 28 May 2009 on agricultural product quality policy ( COM(2009)0234 ),
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 15. oktobra 2008 o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov: proizvodni standardi, zahteve za kmetovanje in sheme kakovosti ( KOM(2008)0641 ),
having regard to the Commission's green paper of 15 October 2008 on agricultural product quality: product standards, farming requirements and quality schemes ( COM(2008)0641 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2009 o zagotavljanju kakovosti hrane, vključno z uskladitvijo ali vzajemnim priznavanjem standardov Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0098 .
having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2009 on ensuring food quality including harmonisation or mutual recognition of standards Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2009)0098 .
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije iz oktobra 2008 o shemah za potrjevanje kakovosti živil,
having regard to the Commission staff working document of October 2008 on food quality certification schemes,
ob upoštevanju sistematskega pregleda skupne kmetijske politike (SKP),
having regard to the health check for the common agricultural policy (CAP),
ob upoštevanju predloga uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zagotavljanju informacij o živilih potrošnikom ( KOM(2008)0040 ),
having regard to the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the provision of food information to consumers ( COM(2008)0040 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ter mnenj Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0029/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinions of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0029/2010 ),
ker ima Evropska unija najvišje standarde kakovosti živilskih proizvodov na svetu ter ker ti visoki standardi izpolnjujejo pričakovanja evropskih potrošnikov in so sredstvo za ustvarjanje večje dodane vrednosti,
whereas the European Union has the highest quality standards for food products in the world and these high standards are demanded by Europe's consumers and represent a means of maximising added value,
ker se s podpiranjem malih in srednjih kmetij, ki s svojo proizvodnjo in porabo zadovoljujejo lokalne potrebe, podpirajo tradicionalne in empirične metode pridelovanja ter zagotavlja njihovo izvajanje v skladu z najvišjimi standardi kakovosti in varnosti,
whereas support for small and medium-sized farms, whose production and consumption levels meet local requirements, sustains both traditional and empirical farming methods and ensures they are applied in accordance with the highest standards of quality and safety,
ker so kakovostni evropski proizvodi del žive kulturne in gastronomske dediščine Evropske unije in so zato pomemben sestavni del gospodarskega in družbenega življenja mnogih evropskih regij, saj omogočajo dejavnosti, ki so zlasti na podeželskih območjih neposredno povezane z realnim stanjem lokalnih skupnosti,
whereas European quality products constitute a living cultural and gastronomic heritage for the Union and are an essential component of economic and social activity in many of Europe's regions, bolstering activities directly linked to local realities, especially in rural areas,
ker obstoječa politika glede distribucijske verige vpliva na možnosti malih proizvajalcev za doseganje široke ciljne skupine,
whereas existing policy concerning the distribution chain affects small producers‘ chances of reaching a wide target group,
ker potrošnike poleg varnosti hrane vedno bolj zanimajo tudi poreklo in metode proizvodnje živil; ker se je EU že odzvala na ta trend ter uvedla štiri sheme kakovosti in porekla živil, in sicer zaščiteno označbo porekla (ZOP), zaščiteno geografsko označbo (ZGO), zajamčeno tradicionalno posebnost (ZTP) in ekološko pridelano živilo,
whereas there is ever-increasing consumer interest not only in food safety but also in the origins and production methods of food products; whereas the EU has already responded to this trend by introducing four food quality and origin schemes, namely Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI), Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) and Organic Farming,
ker potrošniki povezujejo te sheme potrjevanja z jamstvom za višjo kakovost,
whereas consumers associate these certification schemes with a guarantee of higher quality,
ker je nove tehnologije mogoče uporabiti za navedbo podrobnih informacij o poreklu in značilnostih kmetijskih in živilskih proizvodov,
whereas new technologies can be employed for providing detailed information on the origins and characteristics of agricultural and food products,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije in vključitev številnih priporočil Parlamenta vanj, kar je rezultat premisleka, ki ga je spodbudila zelena knjiga o kakovosti kmetijskih proizvodov; izraža željo po čimprejšnji izvršitvi ukrepov, ki jih Parlament predlaga v tej resoluciji, da bi v praksi učinkovito izkoristili povratne informacije kmetov in proizvajalcev, pridobljene med postopkom posvetovanja, z namenom oceniti zaželenost, nujnost in sorazmernost predlaganega zakonodajnega okvira, ob upoštevanju učinkov gospodarske krize in potrebe po izogibanju ustvarjanju dodatnih stroškov ali bremen za proizvajalce;
Welcomes the Commission's communication and the incorporation therein of several of Parliament's recommendations following the reflection process launched through the green paper on agricultural product quality; wishes to see the measures proposed by Parliament in this resolution implemented as soon as possible, so as to act effectively on the feedback received from farmers and producers during the consultation process and with a view to assessing the desirability, necessity and proportionality of the proposed regulatory framework, while taking account of the effects of the economic crisis and the need not to generate additional costs or burdens for producers;
obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije zaradi prizadevanja za poenostavitev, ki bi lahko delovala zaviralno, le deloma upošteva zahteve, ki so jih zainteresirani sektorji izrazili po objavi zelene knjige;
Regrets the fact that, on grounds of a simplification which could prove counterproductive, the Commission communication has only partially taken on board the requirements specified by the sectors concerned following the publication of the green paper;
poudarja, da je kakovost najpomembnejše vprašanje v celotni prehrambeni verigi in da je bistvena za podporo konkurenčnosti evropskih kmetijsko-živilskih proizvodov; meni, da je lahko kakovost temelj pomembnih poslovnih prednosti za evropske proizvajalce ter da lahko posredno prispeva k razvoju podeželja;
Emphasises that quality is a key issue for the entire food chain and an essential asset in supporting the competitiveness of European agrifood producers; considers that quality can constitute a foundation for important business advantages for European producers and can make an indirect contribution to rural development;
meni, da lahko politika kakovosti EU prinese večjo konkurenčnost in dodano vrednost v gospodarstvo evropskih regij ter da je kakovostna proizvodnja kmetijskih in kmetijsko-živilskih proizvodov pogosto edina možnost za številna podeželska območja z omejenimi možnostmi za druge vrste proizvodnje; meni tudi, da je kakovost gonilna sila raznolikosti proizvodov in razvoja usposobljenosti delovne sile;
Considers that the EU quality policy can bring about increased competitiveness and added value in the economy of Europe's regions and that quality agricultural and agri-food production is often the only chance for many rural areas with limited production alternatives; further considers quality as an engine for product diversity and a means of developing workforce skills;
poziva h krepitvi politike kakovosti EU, saj je ta za evropske proizvajalce pomembna spodbuda pri izboljšanju njihovih prizadevanj za kakovost, varnost hrane in varstvo okolja; meni, da lahko ta politika prispeva k bistvenemu povečanju dodane vrednosti evropske kmetijsko-živilske proizvodnje na vedno bolj globaliziranem trgu;
Calls for the strengthening of the EU quality policy, since it represents a significant incentive for producers in the Union to improve their efforts in terms of quality, food safety and respect for the environment; believes this policy can help to boost substantially the added value of the Union's agricultural and food production in an ever more globalised market;
je prepričan, da lahko politika kakovosti omogoči znaten razvoj v evropskem kmetijstvu, saj kakovostni proizvodi postajajo področje velike produktivnosti, kjer že samo vrednost proizvodov ZGO presega 14 milijard EUR;
Is confident that quality policy can bring about important developments in European agriculture, quality products being an area of high output, with PGI products alone already worth more than EUR 14 billion;
meni, da bi lahko uvedba različnih ravni zaščite evropskih označb kakovosti privedla do nepravičnih situacij, zlasti če bi se pri tem upoštevala predvsem ekonomska merila; zato meni, da morajo vse geografske označbe uživati enako stopnjo priznavanja;
Considers that introducing different levels of protection for European quality designations could create unfairness, especially if the main criteria employed are economic; believes, therefore, that all geographical indications should enjoy the same degree of recognition;
meni, da je na vedno bolj odprtem trgu nujno, da Unija pri pogajanjih v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) brani načelo o učinkoviti zaščiti kakovostnih proizvodov prek sistema varstva intelektualne lastnine;
Considers that, given the increasingly open market, it is essential that the EU uphold, in the WTO negotiations, the principle of quality products being protected effectively through the safeguard arrangements for intellectual property;
poudarja, da si mora Komisija na pogajanjih Svetovne trgovinske organizacije prizadevati za dogovor o netrgovinskih vprašanjih, s čimer bi zagotovili, da uvoženi kmetijski proizvodi ustrezajo zahtevam EU na področju varnosti hrane, dobrega počutja živali in varstva okolja, ki že veljajo za kmetijske proizvode, proizvedene v Uniji;
Emphasises that, in the WTO negotiations, the Commission must seek to secure an agreement on the ‘non-trade concerns’ which will ensure that imported agricultural products meet the same EU requirements, in the areas of food safety, animal welfare and environmental protection, that are imposed on agricultural products produced inside the Union;
meni, da bi morala biti nova politika kakovosti EU bolj odprta za proizvode iz novih držav članic, ki so šele pred nekaj leti pristopile k sistemu registriranja geografskih označb; meni, da bi morale biti zahteve, ki so pogoj za registracijo, pregledne in razumljive ne le vlagateljem (proizvajalcem), temveč tudi potrošnikom;
Takes the view that the new EU quality policy should be more open to products from the new Member States, which gained access to the system for registering geographical indications only a few years ago; believes that the requirements to be met in order to register a given product should be transparent and understandable not just to applicants (producers) but also to consumers;
meni, da je treba okrepiti nadzor ter izboljšati usklajenost med Komisijo in državami članicami ter s tem zagotoviti, da bodo uvoženi prehrambeni izdelki izpolnjevali standarde kakovosti in varnosti hrane ter okoljske in socialne standarde EU;
Advocates closer monitoring and more coordination between the Commission and the Member States so as to ensure that imported food products meet the EU's quality and food safety standards, as well as its environmental and social standards;
poudarja, da je treba določiti standarde kakovosti, ki zagotavljajo učinkovito komunikacijo s potrošniki o načinu pridobivanja proizvodov spodbujajo izboljšave teh standardov, s čimer prispevajo k doseganju širših ciljev politike EU;
Stresses the need for quality standards that ensure effective communication with consumers about the way that products have been produced and that offer incentives for improving these standards, thus contributing to wider EU policy objectives;
meni, da mora biti evropska politika kakovosti tesno povezana z reformo skupne kmetijske politike po letu 2013; meni tudi, da mora EU v okviru te politike ponuditi finančno podporo za vzpostavitev visoko kakovostne kmetijsko-živilske proizvodnje; meni, da bi se morala takšna podpora izraziti v razvoju, diverzifikaciji in spodbujanju dostopna do drugega stebra skupne kmetijske politike, zlasti kar zadeva posodobitev kmetij ter ustanavljanje in razvoj mikropodjetij na podeželju; poudarja, da lahko finančna podpora za razvoj kakovosti proizvodov pomaga delno samooskrbnim kmetom pri premiku k tržni usmeritvi; meni, da organizacije proizvajalcev potrebujejo več podpore, zlasti zato, da mali proizvajalci ne bi bili v slabšem položaju;
Believes that European quality policy must be closely linked to the reform of the CAP after 2013; takes the view that, in the context of that policy, the EU needs to offer financial support with a view to obtaining agri-food production of high quality; believes that such support should take the form of developing, diversifying and stimulating access to the second pillar of the CAP, especially as regards the modernisation of farms and the creation and development of micro-businesses in the countryside; stresses that financial support for product quality development can help produce a shift towards market orientation for semi-subsistence farmers; believes that producers‘ organisations need more support, especially so as not to disadvantage small producers;
poudarja, da mora raznolikost ostati bogastvo Evrope ter da je treba priznati in zaščititi vse kakovostne proizvode, ki ustrezajo merilom, ki jih opredeli Unija; meni, da mora da SKP po letu 2013 podpirati politiko kakovosti in zlasti prizadevanja proizvajalcev za spodbujanje okolju prijaznejših načinov proizvodnje; ugotavlja, da so regije partnerice SKP ter da tudi sofinancirajo in upravljajo razvoj podeželja; dodaja, da so zaradi svoje zemljepisne bližine regije tudi partnerice proizvajalcev, zlasti proizvajalcev tradicionalnih in ekoloških proizvodov; meni, da bi se regije morale vključiti v proces priznavanja in spodbujanja proizvodov z označbo ter tradicionalnih in ekoloških proizvodov;
Stresses that diversity should continue to be Europe's fundamental asset and that all quality products that meet the criteria laid down by the EU should be recognised and protected; considers that after 2013 the CAP should support the quality policy and, in particular, producers‘ efforts to promote more environment-friendly production methods; points out that regions are the CAP's partners and that they co-finance and manage rural development; adds that, by virtue of their geographical proximity, regions are the partners of producers and, in particular, producers of traditional and organic products; takes the view that regions should be involved in the recognition and promotion of products that carry an indication, traditional products and organic products;
poudarja, da je treba uradno priznati prizadevanja evropskih proizvajalcev pri izpolnjevanju zahtev EU za kmetovanje glede standardov kakovosti, varovanja okolja, dobrega počutja živali in zdravja;
Stresses the need for formal recognition of the efforts made by European producers in meeting EU farming requirements with regard to quality, environmental, animal welfare and health standards;
v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj izpelje študijo o različnih razpoložljivih možnostih, kako bi evropskim proizvajalcem omogočili, da bi na svojih proizvodih prikazali zavezanost h kakovosti, varnosti hrane in spoštovanju vseh evropskih proizvodnih standardov, zlasti z uporabo oznake kakovosti EU, ki bi morala biti na voljo izključno za kmetijske proizvode, ki v celoti izhajajo iz proizvodnje v EU, v nobenem primeru pa pri tem ne bi smeli nastati dodatni stroški za upravljavce ali finančna in upravna bremena za države članice, ki izvajajo nadzor, saj se z oznako potrjuje, da so izpolnjeni predpisi, ki se uradno nadzorujejo;
Calls on the Commission, in this respect, to conduct a study of the various options available for giving European producers the possibility of displaying on their products their commitment to quality, food safety and observance of all European standards of production, including the option of an EU quality logo, which should be made available exclusively to agricultural goods resulting entirely from production in the EU, and which, since it would certify compliance with the legislation subject to official controls, should in no circumstances involve any additional cost to operators or any financial or administrative burden on the Member States exercising the controls;
meni, da kmetijski proizvodi Evropske unije sami po sebi izpolnjujejo standard kakovosti, saj se proizvajajo v skladu z zakonodajnimi določbami EU za kakovost proizvodov, trajnostno proizvodnjo ter okoljska in sanitarna merila (navzkrižna skladnost); poleg tega meni, da se s pridelavo kmetijskih proizvodov ohranjajo evropske kulturne krajine; trdi, da bi morala glede na to obstajati možnost uporabe oznake kakovosti „pridelano [proizvedeno, izdelano] v Evropi“;
Considers that EU agricultural products meet a quality standard in themselves, since they are produced in accordance with EU legislative provisions concerning product quality, sustainable production and environmental and health criteria (cross-compliance); in addition, the cultural landscapes of Europe are preserved through the cultivation of agricultural products; given these requirements, a ‘grown [produced or made] in Europe’ quality label should be a possibility;
meni, da imajo sektorski standardi trženja pomembno vlogo v proizvodni verigi in da jih je zato treba ohraniti; ti standardi namreč zagotavljajo preglednost sprememb na trgu in kupcem omogočajo primerjavo cen, velikosti in kakovosti proizvodov ter tako zagotavljajo enake pogoje v evropski konkurenci;
Considers that sectoral marketing standards play an important role in the production chain, and that consequently they should be kept; they render changes on the market transparent, enable purchasers to compare product prices, sizes and quality, and ensure a level playing-field in European competition;
podpira uvedbo dodatnih neobveznih rezerviranih navedb in zlasti zagotovitev jasne opredelitve ter rabe navedb „hribovski“, „otoški “, „lokalni“ in „nizke emisije“ ter sprejetje EU za njihovo uporabo; prav tako izraža podporo temu, da se na ravni Skupnosti uskladi navedba „hribovski“, ki je zaenkrat zakonsko opredeljena le v nekaterih državah članicah; poziva Komisijo, naj opravi študijo o nadaljnjem razvoju označevanja emisij ogljika v smeri bolj celostnih meritev „ekološkega odtisa“, saj oznake, ki se nanašajo samo na ravni ogljika, zanemarjajo druge poglavitne okoljske vidike, kot so vpliv na vodne vire in biotska raznovrstnost;
Supports the introduction of additional optional reserved terms, and especially the provision of a clear definition and usage of the terms ‘mountain’, ‘island’, ‘local’ and ‘low carbon’, and the adoption of EU guidelines concerning their use; further expresses support for harmonisation at Community level of the term ‘mountain’, which is currently regulated in only a few Member States; calls on the Commission to conduct a study on further developing ‘carbon-footprint’ labelling towards a more comprehensive ‘ecological-footprint’ measurement, since labels or terms which refer only to carbon levels neglect other key environmental aspects, such as impact on water resources and biodiversity;
meni, da je treba spodbujati prostovoljno označevanje okolju in živalim prijaznih načinov proizvodnje, kot so „integrirana pridelava“, „pašna reja“ in „hribovsko kmetijstvo“;
Believes it is necessary to promote the voluntary labelling of other environment-friendly and animal-friendly production methods, such as ‘integrated production’, ‘outdoor grazing’ and ‘hill farming’;
meni, da je treba ohraniti proizvode iz gorskih območij in območij brez genetsko spremenjenih organizmov; zato zahteva od Komisije, da stori vse potrebno za zagotovitev primerne zaščite proizvodov s teh območij;
Considers that products of mountain areas and GMO-free areas should be protected; calls on the Commission, therefore, to make every possible effort to ensure that such areas are appropriately protected;
poziva Komisijo, naj začne preučevati možnost uvedbe kazalcev kakovosti v zvezi s socialnimi pogoji za proizvodnjo, npr. dohodki proizvajalcev in pogodbenimi obveznosti med proizvajalci, predelovalci in trgovci;
Calls on the Commission to launch a reflection process on the possibility of introducing quality indicators related to the social conditions of production, e.g. producers‘ incomes and contractual relations between producers, processors and marketers;
meni, da je pri svežih kmetijskih proizvodih treba navesti državo porekla, pri predelanih proizvodih z eno samo sestavino pa območje porekla osnovne kmetijske surovine, uporabljene v končnem proizvodu, da bi se zagotovili večja preglednost in sledljivost ter tako ozaveščena izbira potrošnika;
Considers that there should be an indication, in the case of fresh agricultural products, of the country of origin and, in the case of single-ingredient processed products, of the place of provenance of the agricultural raw material used in the finished product, with a view to guaranteeing greater transparency and traceability and thus enabling consumers to make informed purchasing decisions;
ugotavlja, da je bila takšna praksa uspešno uvedena v državah, kot sta Avstralija in Združene države, ter da je označevanje „območja kmetovanja“ v Evropski uniji že obvezno za številne kmetijske proizvode;
Notes that ‘place of farming’ labelling has been implemented with success in countries such as Australia and the USA and that it is already mandatory in the EU for a number of agricultural products;