natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
B. ker so preiskave o kršitvah človekovih pravic pogosto neučinkovite, pomanjkljive in zaradi njih ni nihče kaznovan; ker je pomanjkanje preglednosti javnih aktov omogočilo vsesplošne kršitve,
B. whereas investigations into human rights abuses are often ineffective, flawed and result in impunity; whereas lack of transparency of official acts enable widespread abuses,
C. ker nihče ni odgovarjal za smrt Ane Politkovske, Natalije Estemirove, Anastazije Barburove, Stanislava Markelova in Sergeja Magnickega in ker je bilo večkrat prijavljeno sodno ustrahovanje Mihaila Hodorkovskega, Platona Lebedjeva, Olega Orlova, Igorja Vladimiroviča Izmestjeva, Mihaila in Larise Čeprunov, Aleksanda Kalistratova, Alekseja Sokolova in Alekseja Nikiforova,
C. whereas the deaths of Anna Politkovskaya, Natalia Estemirova, Anastasia Barburova, Stanislav Markelov and Sergei Magnitsky remain unaccounted for and judicial harassment of Mikhael Khodorkovsky, Platon Lebedev, Oleg Orlov, Igor Vladimirovich Izmestiev, Mikhail and Larisa Cheprunov, Aleksandr Kalistratov, Alexey Sokolov and Alexey Nikiforov has been in many occasion reported,
D. ker sta bila Mihail Hodorkovski in njegov poslovni partner Platon Lebedjev 30. decembra 2010 obsojena goljufije na moskovskem hamovniškem okrožnem sodišču; ker so bili tožba, sojenje in sodba mednarodno predstavljeni kot politično motivirani; ker je mednarodna skupnost ostro obsojala posredovanje politike in pritiske,
D. whereas Mikhail Khordorkovsky and his business associate Platon Lebedev were given a guilty verdict for embezzlement by Moscow’s Khamovnichesky district court on 30 December 2010; whereas the prosecution, the trial and the verdict were internationally portrayed as politically motivated; whereas political interference and pressuring was criticised strongly by the international community,
F. ker vodenje sojenj proti Mihailu Hodorkovskem in Platonu Lebedjevu ter neuspešni poskusi odpiranja preiskav smrti Sergeja Magnickega, Ane Politkovske, Natalije Estemirove in Stanislava Makrelova kvarijo podobo Rusije na tujem,
F. whereas the conduct of the cases against Mikhail Khodorkovsky and Platon Lebedev, as well as failure to commence the investigations into the deaths of Sergey Magnitsky, Anna Politkovskaya, Natalya Estemirova and Stanislav Markelov, taint the perception of Russia abroad,
G. ker je Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji o človekovih pravicah po svetu v letu 2004 in politiki EU na tem področju z dne 21. oktobra 2010 pozval Svet EU, naj preuči uvedbo prepovedi in zamrznitve sredstev tistih ruskih uradnikov, ki so bili vpleteni v smrt Magnickega , če se preiskava o tem ne bo odprla; ker Evropski parlament v isti resoluciji menil, da je ta primer v nebo vpijoč primer resnih pomanjkljivosti v ruskem pravosodnem sistemu,
G. whereas the European Parliament resolution Human Rights in the World 2009 and EU policy on the matter of 21 October 2010 called the EU Council to consider an entry ban and asset freeze for those Russian officials involved in the death of Magnitsky should no investigation be opened; whereas in the same resolution the European Parliament considered that the case of Magnitsky is an outstanding example of the serious shortcomings of the judicial system in Russia,
H. ker je bila splošna uporaba ruske zakonodaje o ekstremističnih dejavnostih uporabljena za napade na aktiviste za človekove pravice, politične nasprotnike in verske skupine; ker je zakonodajna terminologija nenatančna in se lahko uporablja poljubno; ker so členi 280, 281 in 282 ruskega kazenskega zakonika v tem primeru najpomembnejši; ker v postopkih v zvezi z ekstremizmom in predhodno omenjenimi členi prihaja do pomanjkljivosti in zlorab sodnih postopkov; ker je bil zvezni seznam ekstremističnih gradiv v letu 2010 posodobljen 27-krat in zdaj obsega 748 vnosov, seznam ekstremističnih organizacij, ki je bil posodobljen v letu 2010, pa zajema 18 organizacij,
H. whereas the widespread use of Russian law on Extremist Activities has been used to target human rights activists, political opponents and religious groups; whereas the law is vague in its terminology and content and is used arbitrarily; whereas Articles 280, 281 and 282 of the Russian Criminal Code are of most concern in this regard; whereas trials concerning extremism and the aforementioned Articles contain shortcomings and manipulations of judicial procedure; whereas in 2010, the Federal List of Extremist Materials was updated 27 times, totalling now in 748 entries and the List of Extremist Organizations was updated in 2010, totalling now in 18 organisations,
I. ker je Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice Rusko federacijo obsodilo resnih kršitev človekovih pravic na Severnem Kavkazu v več kot 150 sodbah; ker je izvrševanje sodb še naprej daleč pod standardi; ker je odgovornost za neuspeh pri izvrševanju sodb še vedno večinoma na sodnih ustanovah in organih,
I. whereas the European Court of Human Rights has condemned the Russian Federation for serious human rights violations in the North Caucasus in over 150 judgments; whereas the implementation of the judgments remains drastically substandard; whereas responsibility for the failure to implement the judgments rests in considerable part with the judicial institutions and authorities,
J. ker sodne ustanove in organi pregona niso uspeli ustaviti splošne nekaznovanosti v zvezi s kršitvami človekovih pravic na Severnem Kavkazu; ker niso zagotovljena pravna sredstva za resne kršitve človekovih pravic, napade, umore, prisilna izginotja in primere slabega ravnanja in nedovoljenega zadrževanja v nekaterih območjih Severnega Kavkaza; ker normalizacija razmer na Severnem Kavkazu ne bo mogoča brez zagotovitve, da bodo kršitve človekovih pravic kaznovane in da bo uveljavljena pravna država,
J. whereas judicial and law enforcement institutions have failed to halt the pervasive impunity for human rights violations in North Caucasus; whereas no legal remedy has been guaranteed for the serious human rights violations, attacks, killings, forced disappearances and cases of ill-treatment and arbitrary detention in some areas of the North Caucasus; whereas the normalisation in the North Caucasus is impossible without ensuring accountability for human rights violations and the reinstatement of the rule of law,
K. ker so neodvisni novinarji, aktivisti civilne družbe, odvetniki in zagovorniki človekovih pravic v regiji pogosto žrtve groženj, nasilnih dejanj, nadlegovanja in ustrahovanja ter ker predstavniki organov pregona pogosto omejujejo ali ovirajo njihove dejavnosti,
K. whereas independent journalists, civil society activists, lawyers and human rights defenders in the region have often been the victims of threats and acts of violence, harassment and intimidation and their activities limited or restricted by members of law enforcement bodies,
L. ker je ruski predsednik Medvedjev večkrat zajamčil, da bo uvedel pravno državo, in zagotavljal, da je njegova naloga, da ustvari popolnoma neodvisna moderna sodišča, ki bodo v skladu z gospodarsko razvitostjo države,
L. whereas on many occasions Russian President Medvedev has pledged to reinforce the rule of law stating that his task is to create absolutely independent modern courts that comply with the country's economic development level,
M. ker partnerstvo med EU in Rusijo za modernizacijo, sklenjeno na vrhunskem srečanju med EU in Rusijo 7. decembra 2010, v svojem delovnem načrtu predvideva konkretne predloge in projekte za sodelovanje in pomoč na področju človekovih pravic in pravne države,
M. whereas the EU-Russia Partnership for Modernisation, concluded at the EU-Russia Summit of 7 December 2010, contains in its work plan concrete proposals and projects for cooperation and assistance in the field of human rights and rule of law,
N. ker bi EU lahko razvila pristno partnerstvo z Rusijo na področju trgovine, varnosti in sodstva samo, če bo zagotovljeno spoštovanje zakonov in neodvisnost ter učinkovitost sodišč,
N. whereas the EU can be able to develop a genuine partnership with Russia in areas of trade, security and justice only if the respect for the of law as well as independence and effectiveness of the judicial institutions is ensured,
O. ker države članice EU niso uspele oblikovati enotne politike na področju človekovih pravic do Rusije; ker je položaj EU pri varstvu in spodbujanju človekovih pravic v Rusiji šibkejši zaradi nedoslednosti in neusklajenosti politik držav članic na področju človekovih pravic,
O. whereas the EU Member States have failed to build a coherent human rights policy towards Russia; whereas inconsistencies and lack of coordination in the human rights policy of the EU Member States have resulted in weak EU position concerning protection and promotion of human rights in Russia,
3. poziva ruske sodne organe, naj obsodijo odgovorne za nadlegovanje in ustrahovanje novinarjev, pravnikov in aktivistov za človekove pravice, ter naj od organov zahtevajo odgovornost za neuspehe pri varovanju in zagotavljanju telesne celovitosti v skladu z ustreznimi mednarodnimi in regionalnimi instrumenti za človekove pravice;
Urges the Russian judicial authorities to bring to justice those responsible for harassment and intimidation of journalists, lawyers and human rights defenders and to hold authorities accountable for any failure to protect and guarantee their physical integrity in accordance with relevant international and regional human rights instruments;
7. izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi nepravilnosti v postopku in političnega vmešavanja, do katerih je prišlo v primeru Igorja Vladimiroviča Izmestjeva, in poziva varuha človekovih pravic Ruske federacije, naj ponovno odpre dokumentacijo in začne revizijo tožbe, sojenja in obsodbe;
Expresses concern over reported procedural irregularities and political interference that were raised at the case of Igor Vladimirovic Izmestiev and urges the Ombudsman of the Russian Federation to reopen the files in order to start the review of the prosecution, the trial and the sentencing;
11. poziva Svet, naj v celoti izvaja omenjeno resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta o človekovih pravicah v svetu v letu 2009 in politiki EU na tem področju z dne 21. oktobra 2010; poziva Svet, naj Parlamentu nemudoma predstavi načrt dejavnosti za izvajanje odstavka 120 tega poročila in mu redno poroča o napredku pri tem izvajanju;
Urges the Council to fully implement the aforementioned European Parliament resolution Human Rights in the World 2009 and EU policy on the matter, of 21 October 2010; invites the Council to promptly present to Parliament a plan of action with regards the implementation of Paragraph 120 of this report and regularly inform the Parliament of the progress of the implementation;
19. obžaluje odločitev ruskih oblasti, da poročevalcu Guardiana Luku Hardingu zavrnejo vstop v državo ob njegovi vrnitvi v Moskvo 5. februarja po obisku v Združenem kraljestvu, in da ga pošljejo nazaj z letom v London čeprav je zaprosil za akreditacijo in za vizo;
Deplores the decision of the Russian authorities to deny entry to Guardian’s correspondent Luke Harding on his return to Moscow on 5 February after a visit to the United Kingdom, and to put him on a flight back to London in spite of the fact that he had the required accreditation and visa;
21. ponovno poziva k okrepitvi posvetovanja na področju človekovih pravic, da bi bilo učinkovitejše in usmerjeno v rezultate, pri tem pa naj bi sodelovalo rusko ministrstvo za pravosodje in ministrstvi za zunanje zadeve v Bruslju in Moskvi, na vseh ravneh pa naj bi bil udeležen tudi Evropski parlament;
Reiterates its call for the stepping-up of the Human Rights consultations so as to make it more effective and result-oriented with the participation of Russian ministries of Justice and the Interior and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Brussels and Moscow and with the full involvement of the European Parliament at all levels;
23. poudarja, da mora biti pravna država v srži novega celostnega sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju z Rusko federacijo, zlasti kar zadeva vključevanje operativne klavzule o človekovih pravicah;
Stresses that rule of law must be at the core of the new comprehensive partnership and cooperation agreement with the Russian Federation, with regard, in particular, to the inclusion of an operational human rights clause;
o Evropi 2020
on Europe 2020
PE459.634v01-00 B7‑0102/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Evropi 2020
PE459.634v01-00 B7‑0102/2011 European Parliament resolution on Europe 2020
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „EU 2020: strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast“,
– having regard to the Commission’s communication ‘EU 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom „Letni pregled rasti: spodbujanje ukrepov EU za celovit odziv na krizo“,
– having regard to the Commission’s communication ‘Annual Growth Survey: advancing the EU’s comprehensive response to the crisis’,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva po zasedanju Evropskega sveta z dne 17. in 18. junija 2010,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions following the meeting of the European Council on 17/18 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva po srečanjih Evropskega sveta marca 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007 in decembra 2009,
– having regard to the Presidency conclusions following the meeting of the European Council in March 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007 and December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. junija 2010 o gospodarskem upravljanju in EU 2020,
– having regard to its resolution of 16 June 2010 on economic governance and EU 2020,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o finančni, gospodarski in socialni krizi,
– having regard to its resolution of 20 October 2010 on the financial, economic and social crisis,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 16. decembra 2010 o stalnem mehanizmu za reševanje krize,
– having regard to its resolution of 16 December 2010 on the permanent crisis mechanism,
– ob upoštevanju člena 3 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to article 3 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Sveta o širših smernicah ekonomskih politik držav članic in Unije, ki je bilo sprejeto 7. julija 2010,
– having regard to the Council recommendation on the Broad Economic Policy Guidelines of the Member States and of the Union adopted on 7 July 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta o smernicah za politike zaposlovanja držav članic,
– having regard to the Council decision on guidelines for employment policies of the Member States,
A. ker so nekateri mednarodni partnerji že na poti iz krize, Evropska unija pa se še vedno sooča s težavami, kljub nekaterim negotovim znakom okrevanja,
A. whereas some international partners are currently getting out of the crisis, the EU is still facing difficulties despite some tenuous signs of recovery,
B. ker je bilo 2010 prvo leto veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, ki je namenjena odpravi vrzeli med EU in njenimi državljani in omogoča novo vlogo EU na mednarodnem prizorišču,
B. whereas 2010 was the first year of entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, designed to close the gap between the EU and its citizens give the EU a new role on the international stage,
C. ker je bila strategija Evropa 2020, ki določa pet enako pomembnih krovnih ciljev za uresničitev pametne, trajnostne in vključujoče rasti, sprejeta kot odgovor na izzive, s katerimi se sooča EU,
C. whereas the EU 2020 Strategy, setting out five headline targets of equal importance were adopted to achieve ‘smart, inclusive and sustainable growth’, was seen as the response to challenges faced by the EU,
Splošne opombe – kontekst
General remarks – context
3. izraža globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi nevzdržne stopnje javnega in zasebnega dolga ter napovedi o njenem hitrem dvigu v prihodnjih letih, kar je posledica reševanja bank in nujne ekspanzivne davčne politike kot odziv na krizo, kar je še večje breme, če upoštevamo, da bodo prihodnje generacije podedovale naraščajoč ekološki in zasebni finančni dolg; opominja, da je v obdobju pred krizo prišlo v številnih državah članicah do nevzdržne rasti zasebnega dolga;
Expresses its deep concern over the unsustainable level of public and private debt and its predicted rapid increase in years to come, caused by bank bail-outs and the necessary expansionary fiscal policy in response to the crisis, which is an even larger burden bearing in mind that future generations will inherit both a growing ecological and a growing private financial debt; recalls that private debt experienced an unsustainable increase in many Member States during the period preceding the crisis;
Krovni cilji in upravljanje strategije Evropa 2020
Headline Targets and Governance of the 2020 Strategy
6. izraža zaskrbljenost, ker letni pregled rasti ne navaja, kako se bodo v prvem evropskem semestru obravnavale vodilne pobude in različni dogodki v podporo njihovem izvajanju;
Expresses its concern that the AGS does not give indications on the way the flagships and the various events supporting their implementation shall be dealt with in the framework of the first European Semester;
(b) premik od davčne konkurence med državami članicami k davčnemu sodelovanju, vključno s časovnim načrtom za uvedbo konsolidirane osnove za davek od dobička pravnih oseb in mehanizmom za zagotovitev minimalnega usklajevanja stopnje davka od dobička pravnih oseb na podoben način, kot se sedaj uporablja za DDV;
(b) Moving away from tax competition between Member States towards tax cooperation including a timetable for the introduction of a common consolidated tax base for corporate profits and a mechanism to ensure a minimum coordination of corporate tax rates on a similar basis to that which is currently in place for VAT;
(c) usklajena uvedba okoljskih davkov, da bi razbremenili davke na dohodke od dela in obremenili netrajnostne dejavnosti in proizvode;
(c) Coordinated introduction of environmental taxes in order to shift the burden away from labour taxes towards unsustainable activities and products;
(e) progresivni bančni davek glede na velikost institucije in obseg nezavarovanega kratkoročnega financiranja;
(e) A progressive bank levy regarding the size of the institution and the level of uninsured short-term funding;
(f) uvedba poročanja po posameznih državah o dobičku pravnih oseb in plačanih davkih na ta dobiček ter samodejna izmenjava informacij;
(f) Introducing country-by-country reporting on corporate income and taxes paid thereon, as well as an automatic exchange of information;
(g) zapiranje davčnih oaz, najprej tistih v EU;
(g) Closing down tax havens, starting with those within the EU;
(h) poseben krizni davek na nepričakovani dobiček energetskih družb in drugih zelo dobičkonosnih družb;
(h) Special crisis taxes on windfall profits of energy corporations and other highly profitable firms;
(i) projektne obveznice, uvedbo katerih je Komisija že nekajkrat odložila,
(i) Projects bonds whose creation has been postponed several times by the Commission;
9. poudarja, da javna in zasebna zadolženost povzročata težave za vzdržnost našega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega modela; meni, da je treba obe obliki dolga obravnavati na ustrezen način, ker bi lahko prenagljeno in neustrezno omejevanje javnih financ zadušilo okrevanje in rast zaposlovanja;
Stresses that public as well as private indebtedness trigger problems as to the sustainability of our economic, social and ecological model; believes that both should be addressed in an appropriate manner given that a hasty and inappropriate tightening of public finances could stifle the recovery and the increase of employment rate;
17. opominja, da je Evropski svet decembra 2009 priznal, da bo strategija za trajnostni razvoj še naprej zagotavljala dolgoročno vizijo in bo glavni politični okvir za vse politike in strategije Unije; poziva k boljšim sinergijam med strategijo Evropa 2020, svežnjem o gospodarskem upravljanju, vodilnimi pobudami in prihodnjo prenovljeno strategijo za trajnostni razvoj;
Recalls that the European Council of December 2009 recognised that the Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) will continue to provide a long term vision and constitute the overarching policy framework for all Union policies and strategies; calls for better synergies between the EU 2020 Strategy, the economic governance package, the flagships and the forthcoming revamped SDS;
20. poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi odločnejšo politiko na področju IKT, opominja na osrednjo vlogo standardizacije za omogočanje medobratovalnosti in preprečevanje blokiranja potrošnikov; posebej opominja, da so potrebni odprti standardi; obžaluje, da je potrošnikom v Evropi dostopno manj vsebin in zato poziva k oblikovanju novega spletnega poslovnega modela; opozarja, da je treba vzpostaviti evropski patentni sistem na način, ki bo uskladil dostop z inovacijami, ter proučiti gospodarske učinke evropskega patentnega sistema na mala in srednja podjetja;
Calls on the Commission to deliver a stronger policy in the field of ICT, reminds of the key role of standardisation to enable interoperability and to avoid consumers lock-in; reminds in particular of the importance of open standards; deplores that consumers in Europe can access less content and calls therefore for new online business models to be created; draws attention to the need to design the European patent system in a way as to reconcile access with innovation, and to study the economic impact of a European patent system on SMEs;
21. ugotavlja, da je cilj pobude Komisije, da poudari in uskladi ukrepe, ki spodbujajo inovacije, pozdravlja zamisel o vzpostavitvi inovacijskega partnerstva, ki bo obravnaval glavne družbene izzive in vključeval programe EU na ta področja; vendar poudarja, da bo ta proces uspešen samo, če bi vzpostavljeno učinkovito upravljanje, zlasti za določanje konkretnih ciljev;
Acknowledges that the Commission initiative aims at giving emphasis and coherence to measures promoting innovation; welcomes the idea of establishing Innovation Partnerships for addressing key societal challenges and streamlining EU programmes in these fields; stresses however that this process will only be successful if effective governance is established, in particular for the setting of concrete objectives;
24. pozdravlja vodilno pobudo „Mladi in mobilnost“; poziva države članice, naj ukrepajo v zvezi s predlogi vodilnih pobud; meni, da mora Komisija voditi pri izvajanju pobude in jo podrobno spremljati; vendar obžaluje, da vodilna pobuda ne obravnava osrednjih tem, kot so sodelovanje v družbi in revščina med mladimi; poziva k odločnejšim predlogom za vključevanje;
Welcomes the initiative of the flagship ‘Youth on the Move’; calls on Member States to take action with regards to the flagships proposals; believes the Commission must take the lead on its implementation and follow it closely; regrets however, that the flagship leaves core subjects, such as participation in society or youth poverty, unaddressed; calls for stronger proposals on inclusion;
Vodilna pobuda „Evropska platforma za boj proti revščini“
Flagship ‘ Platform against Poverty ’
Vodilna pobuda „Program za nova znanja in spretnosti in nova delovna mesta“
Flagship ‘ An agenda for new skills and jobs ’