natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker je cilj pogajalskih strani razširiti sporazum ACTA na države v razvoju in države v vzponu; ker so pomembne trgovinske partnerice, kot so Indija, Brazilija in Kitajska, na zasedanju sveta za TRIPS Svetovne trgovinske organizacije izjavile, da je lahko sporazum ACTA v nasprotju s sporazumom TRIPS in drugimi sporazumi te organizacije,
G. whereas the aim of the negotiating parties is to extend ACTA to developing and emerging countries; whereas important trading partners such as India, Brazil and China have asserted at the WTO TRIPS Council that ACTA may conflict with the TRIPS Agreement and other WTO agreements,
H. ker opredelitev ponarejanja v sporazumu TRIPS zajema le namerne kršitve blagovne znamke v trgovinsko pomembnem obsegu (sporazum TRIPS, III. del, oddelek 4, člen 51) http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm4_e.htm
H. whereas the definition of counterfeit in the TRIPS agreement is only related to wilful commercial scale trademark infringement (TRIPS, Part III, Section 4, Article 51) http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm4_e.htm
I. ker je Komisija kot varuhinja Pogodb zavezana, da pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo v Evropski uniji, zagovarja pravni red Skupnosti,
I. whereas the Commission as guardian of the Treaties is obliged to uphold the acquis communautaire when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU,
K. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, skladen s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima Evropska unija v zvezi z zakonodajo o zasebnosti in varstvu podatkov, kakor je opredeljeno zlasti v Direktivi 95/46/ES, Direktivi 2002/58/ES (kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009) in Direktivi 2009/136/ES in Direktivi 2009/140/ES o elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah ter v sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
K. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection law, as notably set forth in Directive 95/46/EC, in Directive 2002/58/EC (as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009), in Directive 2009/136/EC and Directive 2009/140/EC on Electronic communications networks and services, and in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
L. ker je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 19. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da mora Unija na področju temeljnih pravic delovati brezhibno in da mora biti v zvezi s tem za zgled; ker je Komisija na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da sporazum ACTA še ni parafiran in da je kot pogajalka pristojna, da določi, na kateri stopnji so pogajanja tehnično zaključena in se sporazum lahko parafira,
L. whereas the Commission stated in its Communication on 19 October 2010 that the ‘Union’s action must be above reproach when it comes to fundamental rights’ and that the ‘Union must be exemplary in this respect’; whereas the Commission stated in Plenary on 20 October 2010 that ACTA ‘is not yet initialled’ and that ‘it is the Commission’s prerogative, as a negotiator, to determine the point at which negotiations are technically finalised and at which the agreement can be initialled’;
M. ker se nobenih določb v sporazumu ACTA ne sme razlagati tako, kot da ustvarjajo precedens oziroma omogočajo sedanje ali prihodnje odstopanje od varstva temeljnih pravic, ki jih priznava zakonodaja EU, ali spremembo pravnega reda, ki bi njihov varstvo lahko oslabila, Komisija in Svet pa bi morala s tem načelom izrecno soglašati,
M. whereas no provision in the ACTA Agreement must be interpreted to create a precedent or to allow for the present or future derogation from, or the amendment of the acquis that could lead to the weakening of, the protection of fundamental rights under EU law, and the Commission and Council should explicitly state their agreement with this principle,
Geografske označbe
Geographical indications
N. ker je Komisija večkrat poudarila, da je treba izvajati zaščito geografskih oznak; ker so se podpisnice dogovorile, da bo sporazum ACTA zagotavljal izvajanje vseh kategorij intelektualne lastnine, navedene v II. delu sporazuma TRIPS, vključno z geografskimi označbami,
N. whereas the Commission has repeatedly affirmed the importance of enforcing the protection of geographical indications (GIs); whereas it has been agreed by parties that ACTA will provide for the enforcement of all categories of intellectual property recognised under Part II of the TRIPS Agreement, including GIs,
Kazenskopravni pregon in sankcije
Criminal enforcement and sanctions
O. ker je Komisija leta 2007 državam članicam naslovila anketo, da bi pripravila študijo, v kateri bi preverila, ali so kazenske sankcije pomembne za zagotovitev učinkovitega izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti na področju pravic intelektualne lastnine, kakor to zahteva člen 83(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
O. whereas in 2007, the Commission launched a questionnaire addressed to Member States in order to conduct a study to verify whether criminal sanctions are essential to ensure the effective implementation of community law in the area of intellectual property rights, as required by Art 83.2 TFEU,
P. ker poglavje sporazuma ACTA o kazenskopravnem pregonu obravnava določbe o kazenskih postopkih, kazenski odgovornosti, kaznivih dejanjih, kazenskopravnem pregonu in kaznih; ker se je o določbah v zvezi s kazenskopravnim pregonom v sporazumu ACTA pogajalo predsedstvo Sveta,
P. whereas the Criminal Enforcement section of ACTA concerns provisions on criminal procedures, criminal liability, criminal offenses, criminal enforcement and penalties; whereas the Presidency of the Council has negotiated the criminal enforcement provisions in ACTA,
Q. ker je v pisni izjavi 12/2010 poudarjeno, da je treba pred uvedbo kazenskih sankcij povsod, kjer se že izvajajo civilnopravni ukrepi, oceniti gospodarska in inovativna tveganja,
Q. whereas the written Declaration 12/2010 stressed that economic and innovation risks must be evaluated prior the introduction of criminal sanction where civil measures are already in place,
R. ker je v členu 2.14.1 sporazuma ACTA opredeljen trgovinski obseg: „za namene tega poglavja, med dejanja, izvedena v trgovinskem obsegu, spadajo vsaj tista dejanja, ki so bila izvedena kot trgovinske dejavnosti za neposredno ekonomsko ali komercialno korist“,
R. whereas ACTA article 2.14.1 contains a definition of commercial scale: ‘For the purpose of this section, acts carried out on a commercial scale include at least those carried out as commercial activities for direct economic or commercial advantage’,
S. ker je v opombi 9 v sporazumu navedeno: „Vsaka pogodbenica mora nameren uvoz ali izvoz blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk ali piratskega blaga v trgovinskem obsegu obravnavati kot nezakonito dejavnost, za katero so zagrožene kazenske sankcije iz tega člena.
S. whereas ACTA footnote 9 says: ‘Each Party shall treat wilful importation or exportation of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a commercial scale as unlawful activities subject to criminal penalties under this Article.
T. ker je besedilo člena 2.5.1 in 2.5.1a zelo zaskrbljujoče ter omogoča ukrepe, ki ogrožajo pravice državljanov do zasebnosti in varstva podatkov,
2.5 1 and 2.5.1a is extremely worrying and opens the door to measures that threaten the privacy and data protection rights of citizens,
Dostop do zdravil
Access to medicines
U. ker je komisar za trgovino med plenarnim zasedanjem 20. oktobra 2010 Parlament povabil, da izrazi svoje mnenje o odprtem vprašanju, ali naj se vprašanje patentov vključi v poglavja o civilnopravnem uveljavljanju; ker so pogajalci za sporazum ACTA mnenja, da ta ne bo oviral čezmejnega tranzita zakonitih generičnih zdravil; ker je Parlament v svoji resoluciji in pisni izjavi izrazil, da noben ukrep za krepitev pristojnosti čezmejnega nadzora in zaseg blaga ne sme ogrožati splošnega dostopa do zakonitih, cenovno sprejemljivih in varnih zdravil,
U. whereas the Trade Commissioner invited the Parliament during the 20 October 2010 plenary to express its opinion on the outstanding issue of whether to include patents in the Civil Enforcement sections; whereas ACTA negotiators have asserted that ‘ACTA will not hinder the cross-border transit of legitimate generic medicines’; whereas Parliament in its resolution and written declaration has declared that any measure aimed at strengthening powers of cross-border inspection and seizure of goods should not harm global access to legal, affordable and safe medicines,
Pravice intelektualne lastnine v digitalnem okolju
IPRs in the digital environment
V. ker meni, da po direktivi o elektronskem poslovanju ponudniki internetnih storitev za podatke, ki jih prenašajo ali gostijo s pomočjo svojih storitev, ne bi smeli nositi take odgovornosti, da bi morali te podatke pred prenosom nadzirati ali filtrirati; ker Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov v svojem mnenju o sporazumu ACTA opozarja, da utegnejo ponudniki internetnih storitev v pogodbe s svojimi strankami vključiti klavzule o spremljanju njihovih podatkov in ukinitvi njihovih naročnin,
V. whereas the e-commerce directive takes the view that internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would necessitate prior surveillance or filtering of such data; whereas EDPS’ opinion on ACTA warns that internet service providers (ISPs) might insert ‘clauses in their customer’s contracts allowing the monitoring of their data and the cutting of their subscriptions’,
W. ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA zavezale k ohranitvi obveznosti iz člena 7 sporazuma TRIPS, da bi prispevale k spodbujanju tehnoloških inovacij; ker se temeljne politike EU v zvezi z interoperabilnostjo opirajo na določbe pravnega reda Skupnosti (zlasti Direktive 91/250/EGS), ki podpirajo obratno inženirstvo in izogibanje,
W. whereas ACTA parties have committed to upholding obligations under Article 7 of the TRIPS Agreement to contribute to the promotion of technological innovation; whereas fundamental EU policies related to interoperability rely on provisions in the acquis communautaire (in particular in the Directive 91/250/EEC) supporting reverse engineering and circumvention,
X. ker so bili v besedilo ACTA (v preambulo in v vsebinske določbe) vključeni številni pomembni ukrepi; ker člen 1.2 sporazuma določa, da vsaka pogodbenica svobodno določi ustrezno metodo za izvajanje določb tega sporazuma v skladu s svojim pravnim sistemom in prakso,
X. whereas a number of important safeguards are included in the ACTA Text in both the preamble and substantive provisions of the text; whereas Article 1.2 of the agreement states that ‘[E]ach Party shall be free to determine the appropriate method of implementing the provisions of this Agreement within its own legal system and practice’,
Z. ker je podpredsednica Kroes nedavno v Avignonu izjavila: „Nekaterim pridobitnim interesom bi morda ustrezalo, da bi se izognili razpravi o avtorskih pravicah ali da bi jo omejili na moraliziranje, ki bi demoniziralo na milijone državljanov.
Z. whereas Vice-President Kroes recently declared in Avignon: ‘It may suit some vested interests to avoid a debate, or to frame the debate on copyright in moralistic terms that merely demonise millions of citizens.
Vendar ta pristop ni trajnosten. [...]
But that is not a sustainable approach. [...]
Odbor ACTA
ACTA Committee
1. je seznanjen s prizadevanji Komisije za boljšo preglednost in da se je zavezala zaščiti inovacije in konkurenčnost EU; poziva Komisijo, naj v duhu pregledanega okvirnega sporazuma pred parafiranjem sporazuma v celoti upošteva mnenje Evropskega parlamenta;
Takes note of the Commission’s efforts to improve transparency and its commitment towards protecting the EU’s innovation and competitiveness; urges the Commission, in the spirit of the revised framework agreement, to fully take into consideration the opinion of the European Parliament before initialling the Agreement;
4. poziva Komisijo, naj izrecno potrdi, da ne bo nikoli predlagala spremembe pravnega reda, da bi ga uskladila z neobvezujočimi določbami sporazuma ACTA tako, da bi se lahko zmanjšalo varstvo temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji;
Asks the Commission to explicitly confirm that it shall not, now or in the future, propose to alter the aquis in order to bring it in line with any of the non-mandatory provisions of the ACTA Agreement in any way that could result in the lowering of fundamental rights protections in the EU;
7. zato želi vedeti, na katerih pravnih argumentih temelji nesoglasje Sveta in Komisije o obliki pogodbe in katere pristojnosti so bile podeljene pogajalcu;
Asks therefore to know on which legal arguments the Council and the Commission disagree on the format of the Treaty and is to take knowledge of the mandate that has been given to the negotiator,
Obmejni ukrepi
Border Measures
9. je zaskrbljen zaradi vsebine člena 2.X oddelka 3, ki omenja, da je v sporazum vključena osebna prtljaga potnikov, tudi če prevažano blago nima trgovinske narave, razen če podpisnice sklenejo, da jo izključijo; meni, da ta člen podpisnice spodbuja k sprejetju strožjih pravil o kontroli osebne prtljage potnikov na mejnih prehodih, ko bi Komisija vendar morala na mednarodni ravni braniti večjo zaščito temeljnih pravic potnikov, zlasti pravico do zasebnosti;
Is concerned by the content of article 2.X of section 3, which mentions the fact that travellers’’ personal luggage, even when the goods carried are of non-commercial nature, are covered by the agreement unless parties decide to exclude them ; considers that this article constitutes an incitation to the adoption by parties of stricter rules regarding checks of travellers’ personal luggage at borders, while on the contrary the Commission should have defended at the international level a greater protection of people’s fundamental rights, in particular the right to privacy;
13. opaža, da opredelitev trgovinskega obsega v členu 2.14.1 ni v skladu z načelom sorazmernosti;
Observes the definition of commercial scale in Article 2.14.1 fails to meet the principle of proportionality;
16. zato poziva Komisijo, naj vztraja, da se „zagotovi“ nadomesti z „lahko zagotovi“ in da se za večjo jasnost besedilo „prepreči kršitev pravic intelektualne lastnine“ nadomesti s „prepreči ponarejanje“,
Asks, therefore, the Commission to insist on replacing "shall" by "may" and, for reasons of clarity, replace (as well) the words "infringements of any intellectual property rights from occurring" by "counterfeiting from occurring";
18. poudarja, da morajo kazenski ukrepi ostati v mejah področja uporabe iz sporazuma TRIPS in pravnega reda Skupnosti, saj v besedilu ACTA ni temeljite presoje vpliva in ad hoc zaščitnih ukrepov za zagotovitev njihove sorazmernosti;
Stresses that in the absence of a meaningful impact assessment and ad hoc safeguard ensuring their proportionality in the text of ACTA, criminal measures should remain within the scope provided by both TRIPS and of the acquis communautaire;
24. naroča Komisiji, naj Parlamentu pred parafiranjem sporazuma predloži pravno analizo pomena, zakonitosti in uveljavljanja želenih politik iz sporazuma ACTA v zvezi s sodelovanjem med ponudniki storitev in imetniki pravic, zlasti glede tega, v kakšni meri prizadevanja za sodelovanje v poslovnem svetu ne bodo omejevala temeljnih pravic državljanov, vključno s pravico do zasebnosti, pravico do svobode izražanja in pravico do zakonitega pravnega postopka; opozarja Komisijo, da v skladu z medinstitucionalnim sporazumom iz leta 2003 ne sme podpirati samoregulativnih ali koregulativnih mehanizmov, ko gre za temeljne pravice, kot je pravica do svobode izražanja;
Instructs the Commission to present to Parliament, before initialling the Agreement, a legal analysis of the meaning, legality and enforceability of ACTA’s desired policies regarding cooperation between service providers and right holders, particularly in reference to how cooperative efforts within the business community will not limit fundamental rights of citizens, including the right to privacy, the right to freedom of expression and the right to due process; reminds the Commission that it is precluded by the 2003 Inter-Institutional Agreement from supporting self- and co-regulatory mechanisms where fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of expression, are at stake;
32. je zelo zaskrbljen, ker lahko imetnikom pravic informacije razkrijejo (člen 2.18.4) tudi organi, ki niso nujno sodni organi („pristojni organi“);
Is deeply concerned about the disclosure of information to rights holders (Article 2.18.4) by not necessary judicial authorities (‘competent authorities’);
34. je zaskrbljen zaradi splošne neučinkovitosti opomina v opombi 14, ki navaja, da "brez poseganja v področje uporabe avtorskih ali povezanih pravic iz zakonodaje podpisnic...", ter opombe pogajalca, dodane k opombi 15, da podpisnice niso obvezane zahtevati interoperabilnosti, kar nasprotuje sporočilu iz nedavno sprejete Evropske digitalne agende;
Is concerned about the global ineffectiveness of the caveat inserted at footnote 14, which reads as follows: ‘without prejudice to the scope of copyright or related rights contained in a Party’s law...’, and about the Negotiator Note added to footnote 15, stating that there is no obligation for a Party to mandate interoperability, which seems to contradict the message stated in the recently adopted Digital Agenda;
36. meni, da bi se morala Komisija zavzemati za ustrezno prožnost postopkov in pogojev za pristop k sporazumu ACTA in v skladu s sklepi Sveta o usklajenosti politik za razvoj upoštevati stopnjo razvoja, potrebe in cilje držav pristopnic;
Takes the opinion that the Commission should advocate to that procedures and terms of accession to ACTA are appropriately flexible and shall take into account the development levels, needs and objectives of acceding countries, in line with the Council Conclusions on Policy Coherence for Development;
Večstranskost in mnogostranskost
Plurilateralism versus multilateralism
Pogoji EP za odobritev
EP ’ s Conditions to the Consent
o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
on ACTA
PE450.455v01-00 B7‑0621/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju
PE450.455v01-00 B7‑0621/2010 European Parliament resolution on ACTA
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations,
– ob upoštevanju svoje pisne izjave 0012/2010 o premajhni preglednosti postopka, povezanega s trgovinskim sporazumom za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to its Written Declaration 0012/2010 on the lack of transparent process for the Anti-counterfeiting trade agreement (ACTA),
– ob upoštevanju Deklaracije iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju, sprejete 4. novembra 2001,
– having regards to the Doha Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, adopted on November 14, 2001,
A. ker je bil sporazum ACTA sprva predložen kot sporazum proti ponarejanju, kasneje pa so ga razširili na varstvo patentov, blagovnih znamk in avtorskih pravic, Evropska komisija pa za pogajanje v zvezi s tem nima pooblastila,
A. whereas ACTA agreement was first presented as an agreement against counterfeiting, but has then moved to the defence of patents, trademarks and copyright, with the European commission negotiating with no mandate thereon,
B. ker je sporazum ACTA vzbudil resno zaskrbljenost v Evropskem parlamentu in med državljani v zvezi s vprašanji, kot so vprašanja spoštovanja temeljnih pravic, zasebnosti, varstva podatkov, spoštovanja pomembne vloge odprtega interneta, varovanja vloge ponudnikov storitev in zagotavljanja dostopa do zdravil,
B. whereas ACTA has raised serious concerns in the European Parliament and among citizens over issues such as the Respect for fundamental rights, privacy and data protection, the respect for the important role of free Internet and the safeguard of the role of service providers and the safeguard of access to medicines,
C. ker še ni bila vzpostavljena pravna podlaga sporazuma ACTA, kljub izrecni zahtevi Evropskega parlamenta,
C. whereas the legal basis of ACTA has not yet been established, despite the clear request of the EP,
D. ker je Komisija brez ustrezne pristojnosti, ki bi zagotavljala pravno podlago, ter kljub temu, da ni bilo obravnave o glavnih vprašanjih, ki jih je Evropski parlament izpostavil v svoji resoluciji z dne 10. marca 2010, nadaljevala pogajanje za sporazum ACTA,
D. whereas the Commission has continued to negotiate on the ACTA agreement without an adequate mandate giving a legal base and despite the resolution the fact that the main issues raised by the European Parliament in its resolution of March 10, 2010 have not been addressed,
E. ker se je 2. oktobra 2010 v Tokiu zaključil 11. in zadnji krog pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu za boj proti ponarejanju (ACTA), Komisija pa napoveduje morebiten zaključek pogajanj,
E. whereas the 11th and final round of the negotiations for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) was concluded in Tokyo, Japan on October 2,.2010 and the Commission is announcing the possible conclusion of negotiations,
F. ker poleg EU v pogajanjih sodeluje samo 10 držav, ki imajo največ patentov, blagovnih znamk, pravic intelektualne lastnine in geografskih označb na svetu, ter samo dve državi v razvoju (Maroko in Mehika),
F. whereas in addition to the EU only 10 countries owning most of the patents, trademark, intellectual property rights and geographical indications of the world, and only two developing countries (Morocco and Mexico) participated in the negotiations,
G. ker nameravajo pogajalske strani razvijajočim se državam in državam v razvoju očitno predrzno vsiliti sporazum ACTA, ki je že zaključen in sklenjen, verjetno z dvo- in večstranskimi trgovinskimi sporazumi, ne da bi jim omogočile, da k dogovorjenemu besedilu prispevajo svoja stališča,
G. whereas the clear pretension of the negotiating parties is to impose an already closed and settled ACTA agreement to emerging and developing and countries, probably through bilateral and multilateral trade agreements without giving them the chance to bring any input in the negotiated text,
H. ker niso bila vsa pogajalska besedila objavljena, kot je zahteval Evropski parlament v svoji resoluciji z dne 10. marca 2010, in sicer do 6. oktobra 2010, ko je bilo objavljeno besedilo, ki je bilo v veliki meri že izoblikovano, nato pa je Komisija obvestila Parlament,
H. whereas not all negotiation texts were made public as requested by the European Parliament in its resolution of March 10, 2010, until October 6 2010 when the largely finalised text was made public and thereafter, the Commission briefed Parliament,
J. ker mora Komisija kot varuh pogodb braniti pravni red Skupnosti, kar pomeni, da ga ne sme spreminjati, kadar se pogaja o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo EU,
J. whereas the Commission as guardian of the Treaties is obliged to uphold, this implies that it can not change, the acquis communautaire, when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU,
K. ker je Komisija na plenarnih zasedanjih večkrat ponovila, da sporazum za boj proti ponarejanju zadeva samo ukrepe uveljavljanja in ne vsebuje določb, ki bi vsebinsko spreminjale pravo varstva pravic intelektualne lastnine v EU,
K. whereas as the Commission repeatedly said in plenary debates that the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement only addresses enforcement measures and does not include provisions modifying substantive IPR law within the EU,