natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je treba jasno razlikovati med raziskavami in inovacijami kot med dvema različnima procesoma (raziskave spreminjajo naložbe v znanje, inovacije pa znanje v naložbe),
whereas research and innovation need to be clearly distinguished as two different processes (research is turning investment into knowledge and innovation is turning knowledge into investment),
ker sedanji postopek poenostavitve poteka v odločilnem trenutku in zagotavlja zagon za vmesni pregled sedmega okvirnega programa ter za priprave na naslednjega, osmega,
whereas the current simplification process comes at a crucial moment, providing impetus for the Midterm Review of FP7 and for the preparations of the forthcoming FP8,
ker morata oblika in izvajanje sedanjega sedmega okvirnega programa in prihodnjih okvirnih programov temeljiti na načelih enostavnosti, stabilnosti, preglednosti, pravne varnosti, doslednosti, odličnosti in zaupanja,
whereas the design and implementation of the current FP7 and future Framework Programmes must be based on the principles of simplicity, stability, transparency, legal certainty, consistency, excellence and trust,
podpira pobudo iz sporočila Komisije za poenostavitev izvajanja raziskovalnih okvirnih programov ter zagotovitev odločnih in ustvarjalnih ukrepov pri premagovanju ovir, s katerimi se spoprijemajo sodelujoči v njih;
Supports the Commission Communication's initiative in simplifying the implementation of the Research Framework Programmes, providing serious and creative measures in dealing with the bottlenecks faced by the FP participants;
opozarja, da je postopek poenostavite kljub svoji pomembnosti le eden od nujnih reform, ki so potrebne za izboljšanje financiranja raziskav EU;
Draws attention to the fact that, despite the importance of the simplification process, it is only one of the necessary reforms required to improve EU research funding;
poudarja, da je treba v primeru vsakega posameznega ukrepa za poenostavitev določiti, ali bo začel veljati v skladu s sedanjim pravnim okvirom ali pa so potrebne spremembe finančne uredbe, pravil o sodelovanju ali posebna pravila, ki bi veljala za okvirne programe;
Highlights the need to stipulate, in the case of each individual simplification measure, whether it enters into force under the current legal framework or whether changes to the rules of the Financial Regulation, Rules for Participation or the specific rules applying to FP programmes are required;
poudarja dejstvo, da je treba skupaj s poenostavitvami, ki jih je predlagala Komisija, sestaviti podroben načrt za razvoj raziskovalne infrastrukture v novih državah članicah, da bi se oblikovale enake priložnosti za vse države članice pri dostopanju do financiranja v skladu s sedmim okvirnim programom in prihodnjim osmim okvirnim programom;
Emphasises the fact that, alongside the simplifications the Commission has proposed, it should draw up a detailed plan for developing research infrastructure in the new Member States, in order to create equal opportunities for all Member States to access funding under FP7 and the future FP8;
ugotavlja, da zasebni sektor zaradi zapletenih in dolgotrajnih pravil o sodelovanju, visokih stroškov za osebje in pretirane birokracije le malo sodeluje v okvirnih programih;
Notes that the participation of the private sector in the FP remains low due to complex and time-consuming rules governing participation, high personnel costs and excessive red tape;
Pragmatični premik k upravni in finančni poenostavitvi
A pragmatic shift towards administrative and financial simplification
pozdravlja povečana prizadevanja za upravno in finančno poenostavitev pravil okvirnega programa v celotnem življenjskem ciklu programov in projektov (prijava, ocena in upravljanje), kar bi morali zlasti koristiti zainteresiranim stranem;
Welcomes the increasing efforts towards the administrative and financial simplification of FP rules throughout programme and project life cycles (application, evaluation and management), something that should be of primary benefit for stakeholders;
poudarja, da je treba kakršen koli postopek poenostavitve v sedanjem sedmem okvirnem programu izvajati skrbno, da bi se ohranile stabilnost, doslednost in pravna varnost in s tem medsebojno zaupanje vseh zainteresiranih strani; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da si je pri sedanjih pogodbah sicer treba prizadevati za enotno razlago veljavnih pravil, vendar se je treba izogibati uporabi naknadnih „smernic“;
Highlights that any simplification process should be carefully deployed within the current FP7 to maintain stability, consistency and legal certainty, providing mutual trust between all the stakeholders; in that regard stresses that, whereas uniform interpretation of existing rules should be pursued as a matter of urgency, for ongoing contracts the application of post-conclusion ‘guidelines’ should be avoided;
je zaskrbljen, da sta sedanji sistem in praksa upravljanja sedmega okvirnega programa preveč nadzorno usmerjena, zato povzročata zapravljanje virov, manjše sodelovanje in manj privlačne raziskovalne pokrajine; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da se sedanji sistem upravljanja z nično stopnjo dovoljenega tveganja izogiba tveganju, namesto da bi ga obvladoval; zato poziva k reviziji in/ali širši razlagi kadrovskih predpisov EU glede osebne odgovornosti in k predložitvi konkretnih predlogov v sedanji reformi finančne uredbe (npr. sistem zavarovanja ali združevanja tveganja);
Expresses its concern that the current system and the practice of FP7 management are excessively control-oriented, thus leading to waste of resources, lower participation and less attractive research landscapes; notes with concern that the current management system of ‘zero risk tolerance’ seems to avoid, rather than to manage, risks; calls therefore for the revision and/or extended interpretation of the EU Staff Regulation on the issue of personal liability, as well as for the presentation of concrete proposals in the ongoing reform of the Financial Regulation (e.g. insurance or risk-pooling system);
meni, da se morata spremljanje in finančni nadzor EU, ki ju izvajata Komisija in urad OLAF, usmeriti predvsem na varovanje javnih sredstev ter boj proti goljufijam, pri tem pa jasno razlikovati med goljufijo in napakami; v zvezi s tem meni, da je nujno treba oblikovati jasnejšo definicijo napak v vseh zavezujočih pravnih dokumentih, vključno z mehanizmi za ugotavljanje napak, da ne bi prihajalo do različnih razlag; zato poziva k podrobni analizi in sporočanju o napakah ter k ukrepom za odpravo slednjih;
Considers that EU monitoring and financial control carried out by the Commission and OLAF should be primarily aimed at safeguarding public funds and combating fraud, whilst distinguishing clearly between fraud and errors; in that regard considers it necessary to establish a clearer definition of ‘errors’ in all binding legal documents, including the mechanisms for the establishment of errors as opposed to differing interpretations; calls, therefore, for thorough analysis and communication of errors and remedial actions relating thereto;
meni, da mora upravljanje evropskega financiranja raziskav bolj temeljiti na zaupanju do sodelujočih in dopustiti večjo stopnjo tveganja v zvezi z njimi na vseh stopnjah projektov, obenem pa zagotoviti odgovornost s prilagodljivimi pravili EU, ki se lahko, kadar je to mogoče, bolje usklajujejo z različnimi veljavnimi nacionalnimi predpisi in uveljavljenimi računovodskimi praksami;
Believes that the management of European research funding should be more trust-based and risk-tolerant towards participants at all stages of the projects, while ensuring accountability, with flexible EU rules to align better, where possible, with existing different national regulations and recognised accounting practices;
v celoti podpira sprejetje višje stopnje dopustnega tveganja za napake, kar zmanjšuje kompleksnost in naknadna pregledovanja ter zagotavlja ustrezno ravnotežje med dobrim finančnim upravljanjem in ustreznimi kontrolami; poudarja, da je bistveno zagotoviti enako razlago in uporabo pravil, s čimer bi se zmanjšala stopnja napak;
Supports fully the adoption of a higher rate of tolerable risks of error (TRE), something that reduces both complexity and ex-post audits, ensuring a proper balance between sound financial management and appropriate controls; emphasises that it is crucial to ensure that the rules of participation are interpreted and applied in a uniform manner, leading to a decrease in the error rate;
zahteva, da se upravičence, ki prejmejo nepovratna sredstva v okviru OP, obvesti o zadevnih revizijskih strategijah Komisije; priporoča, da se te strategije razširjajo prek nacionalnih kontaktnih oseb in da vključijo v Cordis;
Requests that beneficiaries who receive grants under FP should be informed about the Commission's relevant audit strategies; recommends disseminating these strategies via the National Contact Points and including them in Cordis;
se strinja s širšim sprejemanjem običajnih računovodskih praks, ki so bile jasno opredeljene in dogovorjene, kar tudi podpira, za upravičene stroške sodelujočih, zlasti za metodologije za povprečne stroške za osebje, če so ti postopki v skladu z nacionalnimi pravili in jih potrdijo pristojni organi, in omogočajo vsakemu upravičencu dovolj prilagodljivosti, da lahko uporabijo bodisi metodologijo dejanskih stroškov za osebje ali povprečnih stroškov za osebje;
Agrees to, and recommends, broader acceptance of usual accounting practices for the eligible costs of participants once they have been clearly defined and agreed upon, especially for average personnel cost methodologies, provided that these procedures are in accordance with national rules and certified by competent authorities, leaving enough flexibility for each beneficiary to use either actual personnel costs methodology or average personnel costs methodology;
meni, da bi evropske institucije pri revizijah celotne metodologije stroškov za javne organe morale sprejeti izjave o zagotovitvi točnosti letnih računovodskih poročil organizacije in o zakonitosti in pravilnosti v njih navedenih transakcij, ki so jih izdali nacionalno računsko sodišče in/ali nacionalni javni revizorji;
Considers that in the case of public bodies the statements of assurance on the reliability of the organization's annual accounts and on the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions issued by the national Court of Auditors and/or the national Public Auditors should be accepted by the European institutions when auditing the whole methodology of costs;
podpira nadaljnje zmanjšanje kombinacij stopenj financiranja in metod za opredeljevanje posrednih stroškov za različne instrumente in med dejavnostmi (upravljanje, raziskave, predstavitve in razširjanje) ne da bi pri tem ogrozili sedanje stopnje financiranja; vendar priznava, da je treba ohraniti razlikovanje med univerzami/raziskovalnimi centri, industrijo, neprofitnimi organizacijami in malimi in srednjimi podjetji; Komisijo poziva, naj ohrani uporabo dejanskih stroškov kot metodo kombinacij stopenj financiranja in opredeljevanja posrednih stroškov;
Supports a further reduction in combinations of funding rates and methods for defining indirect costs across the different instruments and between activities (management, research, demonstration and dissemination) without jeopardising the current level of funding rates; acknowledges, however, that the current differentiation between universities/research centres, industry, non-profit organizations and SMEs should be maintained; calls on the Commission to retain the use of actual costs as one method of combining funding rates and defining indirect costs;
meni, da bi bilo treba pavšalne zneske in plačila s pavšalno stopnjo uporabljati prostovoljno in samo kadar je to primerno; poziva Komisijo, naj podrobneje pojasni terminologijo v zvezi z uporabo zneskov s pavšalno stopnjo in pavšalnih zneskov;
Is of the opinion that lump sums and flat rates should be used on a voluntary basis and only applied where appropriate; calls on the Commission to further clarify the terminology in use on flat rates and lump sums;
daje prednost uvedbi pavšalnih zneskov, ki pokrivajo „druge neposredne stroške“, če se bo ohranila možnost dejanskih stroškov; poziva Komisijo, naj strogo oceni uporabo pavšalnih zneskov za stroške za osebje; poudarja, da so ti najučinkovitejša alternativa za države partnerice v mednarodnem sodelovanju znotraj okvirnega programa;
Favours the introduction of lump sums covering ‘other direct costs’, provided that the option of real costs remains; calls on the Commission rigorously to assess the use of lump sums for personnel costs; highlights that lump sums are the most effective alternative for International Cooperation Partner Countries within the FP;
meni, da bi morala večdisciplinarnost dela, ki ga je treba opraviti, upravičiti večje ekipe;
Believes that larger teams should be justified by the multidisciplinary nature of the work to be performed;
predlaga, da bi na primer s postopkom tihe odobritve olajšali spremembo sporazuma o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev, zlasti zato, da bi upoštevali spremembe sestave konzorcija ali njegove upravne in finančne ureditve;
Proposes, for example, a tacit approval procedure in order to facilitate modification of the grant award agreement, particularly in order to take account of changes in the composition of consortia or their administrative and financial configuration;
daje prednost popolni ukinitvi mehanizmov za beleženje porabljenega časa, kot so preglednice prihodov in odhodov (ukinitev ne bi smela biti omejena na uporabo pavšalnih zneskov);
Favours the total abolition of time-recording mechanisms, such as time-sheets (this abolition should not be restricted to the use of lump sums);
pozdravlja takojšnjo ukinitev obveznosti izterjave obresti za vnaprejšnje financiranje;
Welcomes the immediate lifting of the obligation to recover interest fees on pre-financing;
meni, da je treba spodbujati uporabo nagrad, ki pa ne smejo nadomestiti ustrezno strukturiranega financiranja;
Agrees that the use of prizes is to be encouraged but not as a substitute for properly structured funding;
poziva Komisijo, naj dovoli povrnitev stroškov, nastalih po predložitvi predloga, potem, ko je bil izbran, da bi olajšali sodelovanje industrijskim partnerjem in zlasti malim in srednjim podjetjem;
Calls on the Commission to allow the reimbursement of costs incurred after the presentation of the proposal, once successfully selected, in order to ease the participation of industrial partners, and particularly of SMEs;
zahteva enostavnejšo razlago in podrobnejšo pojasnitev opredelitve upravičenih stroškov (kot so davki in dajatve v stroških za osebje, bolniški in porodniški dopust) in vprašanja, ali je mogoče zajeti DDV v upravičenih stroških; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči, ali bi lahko DDV, kadar se ne odbije, šteli kot upravičeno postavko stroškov; poziva, naj se podrobneje pojasnijo postopki v zvezi z menjalniškimi tečaji za partnerje, ki uporabljajo različne valute;
Requests simplified interpretation and further clarification on the definition of eligible costs (such as taxes and charges in personnel costs, sick leave and maternity leave), as well as on the question whether VAT can be covered under eligible costs; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of considering VAT an eligible cost item where non-deductible; requests further clarification on procedures related to exchange rates for partners using different currencies;
obžaluje, da uvedba identifikacijske kode za sodelovanje ni zmanjšala večkratnih prošenj za pravne in finančne informacije (in podporne dokumente), prejetja te kode v postopku prijave pa ne spremlja vedno postopek preverjanja; zato zadevne akterje poziva, naj izboljšajo identifikacijsko kodo za sodelovanje in povečajo učinkovitost njene uporabe;
Regrets that the introduction of the participation identification code (PIC) has not reduced repeated requests for legal and financial information (and supporting documents) and that the reception of PIC during the application process is not always followed by a validation process; calls, therefore, on relevant actors to improve the PIC and make its usage more efficient;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi natančnejši, skladnejši in preglednejši poslovnik za revizije, vključno s pravili in načeli za zagotovitev spoštovanja pravic pregledanih subjektov in mnenja vseh strani, in poroča o razmerju med stroški in koristmi pregledov;
Asks the Commission to present more precise, consistent and transparent rules of procedure for audits, including rules and principles ensuring that the rights of the audited body are respected and that all parties are heard, and to report on the cost/benefit ratio of the audits;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvaja „enoten pristop k reviziji“ in preide na pregledovanje v dejanskem času, ki ga opravi en subjekt, s čimer se omogoči, da upravičenci lahko popravijo vse sistemske napake in naslednje leto izročijo izboljšane izkaze stroškov; meni, da bi s tovrstnim enotnim revizijskim pristopom lahko še bolje zagotovili, da različni revizorji ne bi več kot enkrat pregledovali končanih projektov, tako da bi Komisija zaupala mnenju prvoimenovanega neodvisnega revizorja in da se dokumenti zagotavljajo le enkrat ne glede na število opravljenih revizij;
Urges the Commission to implement the ‘single audit approach’ and to switch to real-time auditing performed by a single entity, thereby allowing beneficiaries to correct any systemic errors and hand in improved cost statements the following year; believes that such a single audit approach should further ensure that finished projects will not be audited more than once by various auditors, so that the opinion of the first appointed independent auditor is trusted by the Commission and documents are provided only once, however many audits are carried out;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi pravno varnost, tako da ne uporablja strožje definicije pravil o sodelovanju za nazaj in da od sodelujočih ne zahteva ponovnega izračunavanja izkazov stroškov, ki so jih službe Komisije že odobrile, ter tako zmanjša potrebo po naknadnih pregledih in popravke za nazaj; poziva Komisijo, naj hitro in premišljeno razreši prejšnje situacije, ki so nastale pri potekajočih pregledih, ter pri tem spoštuje načela dobrega finančnega poslovodenja; priporoča, da bi spore glede prejšnjih situacij razrešili z dogovorom med vsemi stranmi, ki bi na primer temeljil na neodvisni ponovni reviziji in/ali s posredovanjem neodvisnega ad hoc posrednika;
Calls on the Commission to provide legal certainty by refraining from applying a stricter definition of the rules for participation retroactively and by refraining from asking recipients to recalculate financial statements already approved by Commission services, hence reducing the need for ex-post audits and retroactive corrections; asks the Commission rapidly to resolve prior situations arising from inspections in progress, acting with discernment and respect for the principles of sound financial management; recommends that disputes regarding such prior situations be resolved by agreement between all parties, based for example on an independent re-audit and/or with the intervention of an ad hoc independent mediator;
predlaga vzpostavitev odzivnega postopka, v skladu s katerim bi v primeru, da se Komisija ne bi odzvala na prejete informacije v določenem roku, štelo, kot da jih je potrdila;
Proposes the introduction of a response procedure under which, in the absence within a deadline to be established of any reaction from the Commission to information received, the latter shall be considered as validated by the Commission;
poziva Komisijo, naj redno poroča Parlamentu o upravnih stroških sedmega okvirnega programa, vključno s stroški upravljanja tako za Komisijo kot za sodelujoče, ter o sprejetih ali načrtovanih ukrepih za njihovo zmanjšanje;
Invites the Commission to report regularly to Parliament on the administrative cost of FP7, including the management costs for both the Commission and participants, as well as on measures taken or planned to reduce this cost;
Korenit premik k izboljšanju kakovosti, dostopnosti in preglednosti
A radical shift towards improving quality, accessibility and transparency
Premik k „pristopu, ki temelji na znanosti“
Moving to a ‘science-based’ approach
opozarja Komisijo, da se od upravičencev do programov EU pričakuje izvajanje financirane dejavnosti v dobri veri in kar največje prizadevanje, da dosežejo pričakovane rezultate;
Reminds the Commission that beneficiaries of EU programmes are assumed to carry out funded activities in good faith and making their best effort to achieve the results expected;
je zato zaskrbljen zaradi sedanje splošne težnje Komisije k financiranju na podlagi rezultatov (v bistvu utemeljenem na načelu finančne odgovornosti) in posebno zaradi možnega vpliva tako utemeljenega financiranja na kakovost in vrsto raziskav in možnih ovir za znanstveno raziskovanje in negativnega vpliva na projekte z nemerljivimi cilji ali merljivimi cilji z uporabo parametrov, ki nimajo neposredne koristi, je prav tako zaskrbljen zaradi morebitnega izida nadaljnjih predhodnih in naknadnih ocen učinkov/rezultatov projektov in določevanja meril, potrebnih za njihovo določitev;
Is therefore concerned about the current Commission's overall trend towards result-based funding (essentially justified by the principles of sound accountability) and is deeply concerned about the possible impact of result-based funding on the quality and nature of research, with possible constraints on scientific research and a negative impact on projects with non-measurable objectives or with an objective measurable using parameters other than that of immediate utility; is equally concerned about the potential outcome in terms of further ex-ante and ex-post evaluation of project output/results and about the pinpointing of the criteria necessary to define them;
meni, da je razen v izjemnih in ustrezno utemeljenih primerih neprimerna splošna uporaba pavšalnih zneskov, kot so dogovorjeni pavšalni zneski, specifični za posamezen projekt, in vnaprej opredeljeni pavšalni zneski; namesto tega daje prednost pristopu z „velikim zaupanjem“, posebej prilagojenim za pionirske raziskave; priporoča zagon pilotnih testov za financiranje, ki temelji na rezultatih, s pavšalnimi zneski, specifičnimi za posamezen projekt, ki se izplačajo glede na dogovorjene učinke/rezultate za raziskave in predstavitvene projekte na posebej zahtevnih področjih;
Regards as inadequate, save in exceptional and duly justified circumstances, the general use of lump sums such as negotiated project-specific lump sums or pre-defined lump sums per project; favours instead the ‘high-trust’ approach tailor-made for frontier research; recommends launching pilot tests of the ‘result-based funding’ with project-specific lump sums paid against agreed output/results for research and demonstration projects in specifically challenging areas;
namesto tega daje prednost sistemu financiranja, temelječem na znanosti, s poudarkom na znanstvenih/tehničnih merilih in medsebojnim pregledom na podlagi odličnosti, ustreznosti in vpliva ob poenostavljenem in učinkovitem finančnem nadzoru, ki spoštuje pravico do nasprotovanja; meni, da bo posledica pristopa na podlagi znanosti pri nadzornih mehanizmih velik premik od finančne k znanstveni/tehnični plati; meni, da ta pristop omogoča zainteresiranim stranem, da usmerijo prizadevanje na svoje temeljne pristojnosti, na znanstvena/tehnična vprašanja in razvoj Evropskega raziskovalnega prostora;
Favours instead a ‘science-based’ funding system, with emphasis on scientific/technical criteria and peer review based on excellence, relevance and impact, with simplified and efficient financial control, respecting the right of all sides to be heard; believes that this science-based approach will entail a major shift from the financial to the scientific/technical side with regard to control mechanisms; considers that this approach allows stakeholders to focus their efforts on their core competences, on scientific/technical matters and on the construction of the ERA;
Optimalna izraba časa
Optimising time