natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– analizo stroškov in koristi priseljevanja v Evropi od leta 1974 naprej,
– a cost-benefit analysis of immigration into Europe since 1974,
– sredstva in možnosti za znatno povečanje števila rojstev z otrokom in družini prijazno politiko (zvišanje otroških dodatkov, uvedba starševskega dohodka, izboljšanje otroškega varstva, prilagojen delovni čas itd.),
– ways and means of raising the birth rate significantly through a child and family friendly policy (increase in child allowance, introduction of a parental income, better child care, flexible working hours and so on),
– dolgoročne posledice te politike za sisteme socialne varnosti v državah članicah v primerjavi s posledicami priseljevanja kot druge možnosti.
– the implications of such a policy for social security systems in EU Member States in the longer term, in comparison with the impact of the immigration option.
o predlogih turškega premierja Erdogana in o pravici do svobode izražanja
on proposals by the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and freedom of expression
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o predlogih turškega premierja Erdogana in o pravici do svobode izražanja
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on proposals by the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and freedom of expression
ker je turški premier Erdogan junija 2006 na zasedanju parlamentarne skupščine Sveta Evrope izjavil, da "svoboda do izražanja ne pomeni pravice žaliti", in je obenem predlagal, da bi "spodbujanje sovraštva do islama" obravnavali kot zločin proti človeštvu;
whereas the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan stated at the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in June 2006 that freedom of expression ‘does not include the right to offend’ and proposed that what he referred to as ‘inciting hostility towards Islam’ should be viewed as a crime against humanity,
ker je Erdoganov predlog uperjen proti svobodi izražanja in z njo povezani svobodi tiska, saj velja pravica do svobodnega izražanja predvsem za izjave, ki lahko šokirajo ali prizadenejo dele prebivalstva,
whereas, given that freedom of expression applies above all to statements that can shock or disturb sections of the population, Mr Erdogan’s proposal goes against freedom of expression and the related freedom of the press,
ker je treba na ta predlog gledati ob upoštevanju vedno večje islamizacije Turčije, ki jo dejavno usmerja sedanja vladajoča Stranka za pravico in razvoj pod vodstvom Erdogana,
whereas this proposal must be viewed against the background of a steadily increasing Islamisation of Turkey, actively led by the current AKP Government of Mr Erdogan,
meni, da Erdoganov predlog predstavlja kršitev pravice do svobode izražanja in je v nasprotju s temeljnimi načeli demokratične pravne države;
Considers that Mr Erdogan’s proposal constitutes a violation of freedom of expression and runs counter to the fundamental principles of a democratic, constitutional state;
meni, da ta spodbuda k samocenzuri samo še potrjuje, da islamska Turčija ni le država, ki je ni moč vključiti v evropski javni prostor, ampak predstavlja tudi nevarnost za temeljna pravna načela Evropske skupnosti.
Considers that this attempt to introduce self-censorship again highlights not only that Islamic Turkey cannot be integrated into the European public area but that it poses a threat to Europe’s common legal principles.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0326/06
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0326/06
o evropskem pogodbenem pravu
on European contract law
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. marca 2006 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti: pot naprej ( P6-TA-PROV(2006)0109 ),
having regard to its resolution of 23 March 2006 on European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward ( P6_TA(2006)0109 ),
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 26. maja 1989, 6. maja 1994, 15. novembra 2001 in 2. septembra 2003,
having regard to its resolutions of 26 May 1989, 6 May 1994, 15 November 2001 and 2 September 2003,
ob upoštevanju prvega letnega poročila Komisije o napredku z dne 23. septembra 2005 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti (KOM(2005)456 končno), v katerem Komisija ugotavlja, da bo pregled pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov 'prispeval k razvoju širšega skupnega referenčnega okvira',
having regard to the Commission's First Annual Progress Report of 23 September 2005 on European contract law and the acquis review (COM(2005)456 final), in which the Commission states that the review of the consumer acquis 'will in turn feed into the development of the broader CFR',
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 11. oktobra 2004 o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in spremembi pravnega reda Skupnosti: pot naprej (KOM(2004)651 končno), v katerem Komisija ugotavlja, da 'bo po potrebi skupni referenčni okvir pri predložitvi predlogov uporabila kot orodje za izboljšanje kakovosti in skladnosti obstoječega pravnega reda in prihodnjih pravnih instrumentov na področju pogodbenega prava',
having regard to the Communication of 11 October 2004 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on European contract law and the revision of the acquis: the way forward (COM(2004)651 final), in which the Commission states that it 'will use the CFR as a toolbox, where appropriate, when presenting proposals to improve the quality and coherence of the existing acquis and future legal instruments in the area of contract law',
ker v resoluciji z dne 23. marca 2006 Parlament poudarja, da ni jasno, kakšni bodo praktični rezultati pobude o evropskem pogodbenem pravu in na kateri pravni osnovi bodo sprejeti morebitni zavezujoči instrumenti,
whereas its resolution of 23 March 2006 pointed out that it is not clear what the European contract law initiative will lead to in terms of practical outcomes or on what legal basis any binding instrument will be adopted,
ker v svoji resoluciji z dne 23. marca 2006 med drugim zahteva, da Komisija poda izjavo tem, na kakšen način namerava pri svojem nadaljnjem delu upoštevati rezultate delavnic skupnega referenčnega okvira in raziskovalnih skupin,
whereas its resolution of 23 March 2006 required, among other information, a statement by the Commission on the way in which it proposes to take account of the results of the CFR Workshops and the research groups in its subsequent work,
ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da enoten notranji trg ne more brezhibno delovati brez nadaljnjih korakov k uskladitvi civilnega prava;
Reiterates its conviction that a uniform internal market cannot be fully functional without further steps towards the harmonisation of civil law;
opozarja, da je pobuda o evropskem pogodbenem pravu najpomembnejša pobuda, ki poteka na področju civilnega prava;
Recalls that the initiative on European contract law is the most important initiative under way in the field of civil law;
močno podpira pristop širšega skupnega referenčnega okvira o vprašanjih splošnega pogodbenega prava, ki presegajo področje varstva potrošnikov;
Strongly supports an approach for a wider CFR on general contract law issues going beyond the consumer protection field;
poudarja, da se mora poleg dela na pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov delo na širšem skupnem referenčnem okviru nadaljevati; poziva Komisijo, naj poleg dela na pregledu pravnega reda Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov nadaljuje delo na širšem skupnem referenčnem okviru;
Underlines the fact that, besides the work on revision of the consumer acquis, the work on a wider CFR should go on; calls on the Commission to proceed, in parallel with the work on revision of the consumer acquis, with the project for a wider CFR;
poudarja, da mora biti, kljub temu, da končni cilj in pravna oblika skupnega referenčnega okvira še nista jasna, delo na projektu dobro opravljeno, ob upoštevanju, da je lahko dolgoročni rezultat zavezujoč instrument; razne možnosti s ciljem in pravno obliko prihodnjega instrumenta morajo biti še naprej odprte;
Underlines the fact that - even though the final purpose and legal form of the CFR is not yet clear - the work on the project should be done well, taking into account that the final long-term outcome could be a binding instrument; all the various possible options for the purpose and legal form of a future instrument should be kept open;
poziva Komisijo, naj pred zaključkom dela na širšem skupnem referenčnem okviru ne predloži nobenega novega zakonodajnega predloga s področja pogodbenega prava;
Calls on the Commission not to submit any further legislative proposals on contract law issues until the work on a wider CFR has been completed;
poziva še naprej Komisijo, naj v delo na skupnem referenčnem okviru vključi Parlament.
Calls on the Commission continuously to involve Parliament in the work on the CFR.
Naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission..
v skladu s členom 115 poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlaga Vittorio Agnoletto
by Vittorio Agnoletto
o človekovih pravicah v Zimbabveju
on human rights in Zimbabwe
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o človekovih pravicah v Zimbabveju
European Parliament resolution on human rights in Zimbabwe
ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o razmerah v Zimbabveju;
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Zimbabwe,
ob upoštevanju člena 115 svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 115 of its Rules of Procedure,
v zaskrbljenosti zaradi gospodarske krize v Zimbabveju, ki je tri do pet milijonov Zimbabvejcev prisilila k temu, da zapustijo državo in se večidel odpravijo v Južno Afriko;
concerned about the economic crisis in Zimbabwe, which has obliged three to five million Zimbabweans to leave the country, most of them for South Africa,
ker ta kriza izvira iz zelo neenake razdelitve zemlje, ki ima korenine v prihodu naseljencev v času kolonializma, in ker Združeno kraljestvo še ni izpolnilo obveznosti in obljub glede financiranja zemljiške reforme po dekolonizaciji države;
whereas this crisis comes from the very unequal distribution of land, which has its roots in the establishment of settlers during the colonial period, and whereas the United Kingdom has not yet complied with its obligations and promises to finance land reform after the decolonisation of the country,
v zaskrbljenosti zaradi trajajoče politične krize in kršitev človekovih pravic v Zimbabveju,
concerned by the ongoing political crisis and human rights violations in Zimbabwe,
ker je zimbabvejska vlada predlagala zakon o prestrezanju sporočil, ki bo vojaški obveščevalni službi, policiji in uradu predsednika omogočal nadzor nad elektronsko pošto, dostopom do interneta in telefonskimi pogovori,
whereas the Government of Zimbabwe is proposing an Interception of Communications Bill, which will allow the military intelligence services, police and the Office the President to monitor e-mail correspondence, internet access and telephone conversations,
v zaskrbljenosti zaradi poročil organizacij za človekove pravice, da so migranti iz Zimbabveja v Južni Afriki izpostavljeni slabemu ravnanju in zlorabam, in zaradi odločitve britanske vlade, da 7 000 prosilcev za azil izžene v Zimbabve;
concerned at reports from human rights organisations that migrants from Zimbabwe are vulnerable to mistreatment and abuse in South Africa, and at the British Government's decision to deport 7 000 asylum seekers to Zimbabwe; ,
izraža zaskrbljenost nad gospodarskimi razmerami v Zimbabveju in poziva vlado, naj podpre resnično zemljiško reformo, Združeno kraljestvo pa, naj izpolni obljubo glede financiranja te reforme;
Expresses concern about the economic situation in Zimbabwe and urges the government to promote genuine land reform and the UK to comply with its promises to finance land reform;
obsoja kršitve človekovih pravic in poziva zimbabvejsko vlado, naj ukrene vse potrebno, da ustavi šikaniranje političnih nasprotnikov, sindikalnih aktivistov, kmetov, organizacij za človekove pravice, neodvisnih sredstev javnega obveščanja in sodstva ter umakne predlagani zakon o prestrezanju sporočil;
Condemns the human rights violations and urges the Government of Zimbabwe to take necessary measures to stop harassment of political opponents, trade union activists, farmers, human rights organisations, the independent media and the judiciary, and to withdraw the proposed law on the interception of communications;
poziva zimbabvejsko vlado, naj spoštuje mednarodne konvencije o človekovih pravicah in svobodi mnenja ter zagotovi neodvisnost sodstva;
Calls on the Government of Zimbabwe to respect international conventions on human rights and freedom of opinion and to guarantee the independence of the judiciary;
poziva vlado, naj skliče konferenco narodne sprave, da z opozicijskimi strankami in predstavniki civilne družbe doseže soglasje, zato da reši politično krizo ter tlakuje pot pravičnemu in demokratičnemu prehodu po letu 2008;
Calls on the government to convene a national reconciliation conference in order to reach an agreement with opposition parties and civil society representatives with a view to addressing the political crisis and paving the way for a fair and democratic transition after 2008;
poziva Južno Afriko, naj poseben položaj zimbabvejskih migrantov rešuje s celovitimi ukrepi v skladu z določbami v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami;
Calls on South Africa to address the specific situation of Zimbabwean migrants through comprehensive measures in compliance with human rights provisions;
poziva EU, naj ponudi pomoč državam Zimbabveja, ki se soočajo s problemom beguncev, vse evropske države, vključno z Združenim kraljestvom, pa poziva k polnemu spoštovanju pravic zimbabvejskih prosilcev za azil;
Calls on the EU to help neighbouring countries of Zimbabwe which are confronted with refugee problems, and asks all European countries including the UK to fully respect the right of Zimbabwean asylum seekers;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, zimbabvejski in južnoafriški vladi.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Government of Zimbabwe and the Government of South Africa.
o legalizaciji statusa oseb, ki nezakonito prebivajo v državah Evropske unije
on legalisation of the status of illegal immigrants in European Union countries
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o legalizaciji statusa oseb, ki nezakonito prebivajo v državah Evropske unije
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on legalisation of the status of illegal immigrants in European Union countries
ker po tem, ko je socialistična španska vlada januarja in februarja 2005 legalizirala status na sto tisoče oseb, ki so nezakonito prebivale v državi, zdaj tudi nova leva vlada Romana Prodija načrtuje legalizacijo za osebe, ki nezakonito prebivajo na italijanskem ozemlju,
whereas, following the legalisation of the status of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants by the Spanish socialist Government in January/February 2005, the legalisation of the status of illegal immigrants in Italy has also begun under the new left‑wing Prodi II Government,
ker lahko teh več sto tisoč oseb z legaliziranim statusom zaradi prostega pretoka oseb neovirano prečka notranje meje Evropske unije, kar bo imelo škodljive posledice za številne države članice EU,
whereas, thanks to the free movement of persons, these hundreds and thousands of legalised immigrants can cross Europe’s internal borders unhindered, with damaging consequences for many EU Member States,
ker je raziskava Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj pokazala, da politika legalizacije učinkuje kot vaba in ker prvi legalizaciji sledijo druge,
whereas among other things OECD studies indicate that a policy of legalisation creates a suction effect and that one legalisation leads to another,
poudarja, da je zunanja politika načeloma v pristojnosti posameznih držav članic in da mora tako tudi ostati;
Emphasises that aliens policy is and must remain a national responsibility;
vendar opozarja, da politika legalizacije v posameznih državah članicah spodkopava nujno potrebno skupno evropsko politiko za boj proti nezakonitemu priseljevanju in ima škodljive posledice za vso Evropo;
Points out furthermore that the policy of legalisation pursued by individual EU Member States undermines the creation of an urgently-needed common European policy to combat illegal immigration and has damaging Europe-wide consequences;
meni, da s postopkom medsebojnega obveščanja na področju azila in priseljevanja, o katerem je bil pred kratkim sprejet sklep, nikakor ni mogoče preprečiti takšnih škodljivih političnih odločitev in so te z njim dejansko institucionalizirane;
Considers that the recently-agreed mutual information procedure on asylum and immigration can in no way prevent such damaging policy decisions from being taken and indeed formalises them de facto;
zato zahteva, da države članice Evropske unije sprejmejo dogovor, s katerim legalizacija oseb, ki nezakonito prebivajo v eni od držav, v prihodnje ne bo več mogoča.
Calls, therefore, for agreements to be reached between the EU Member States making it impossible to legalise the status of illegal immigrants in future.
ki ga vlagata Ewa Klamt in Patrick Gaubert
by Ewa Klamt and Patrick Gaubert
o skupni politiki priseljevanja
on the common immigration policy
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupni politiki priseljevanja
European Parliament resolution on the common immigration policy
ob upoštevanju člena 6 Pogodbe o EU in člena 63 Pogodbe o ES,
having regard to Article 6 of the EU Treaty and Article 63 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju programa iz Tampereja iz leta 1999 in haaškega programa iz leta 2004 o območju svobode, varnosti in pravice;
having regard to the 1999 Tampere and the 2004 Hague Programmes on the Area of Freedom Security and Justice,
ob upoštevanju srečanja Sveta za pravosodje in notranje zadeve med 20. in 22. septembrom 2006 v Tampereju,
having regard to the JHA Council meeting in Tampere on 20-22 September 2006,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. aprila 2006 o položaju begunskih taborišč na Malti ( P6_TA(2006)0136 ),
having regard to its resolution on the situation with refugee camps in Malta of 6 April 2006 ( P6_TA(2006)0136 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 103(2) svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker bo vmesni pregled haaškega programa opravljen do konca tega leta,
whereas the mid-term review of the Hague Programme will be completed by the end of this year,
ker se je število priseljencev, ki poskušajo nezakonito vstopiti v EU, v zadnjih dveh letih izjemno povečalo, na škodo varnosti in zdravja nezakonitih priseljencev in javnega reda v državah članicah EU,
whereas the number of immigrants seeking to enter the EU in an irregular manner has increased exponentially over the last two years, to the detriment of the safety and health of irregular immigrants and of public policy in EU Member States,
je trdno prepričan, da morajo države članice EU, kar zadeva prosilce za azil in nelegalne priseljence, spoštovati svoje obveznosti po mednarodnem pravu;
Firmly believes that EU Member States must respect their obligations under international law as regards asylum seekers and illegal immigrants;
priznava težave, s katerimi se zadnja leta pri uravnavanju zelo obsežnih migracijskih tokov spopadajo nekatere države članice EU, predvsem Malta, Italija in Španija; zlasti ugotavlja, da skrb zbujajoče število mladoletnikov med zadnjimi prišleki povzroča težave;
Recognises the difficulties encountered by a number of EU Member States, notably Malta, Italy and Spain, in managing the very large migration flows of recent years; notes particularly the problems caused by the worryingly large number of minors among recent arrivals;
meni, da množična legalizacija nezakonitih priseljencev ni rešitev, ravno nasprotno, dejansko poslabša težavo nezakonitega priseljevanja, saj taki ukrepi priseljence dodatno pritegnejo;
Believes that not only is the mass regularisation of illegal immigrants not a solution but that it also in fact exacerbates the problem of illegal immigration since such measures have clearly been shown to act as a 'pull-factor';
ponavlja, da vsaka odločitev o popuščanju pri pravilih o priseljevanju vpliva na položaj drugih držav članic in da so se države članice dolžne, v duhu lojalnega sodelovanja, posvetovati z drugimi državami članicami in jih obveščati o ukrepih, ki utegnejo vplivati na položaj priseljevanja, kot je opredeljeno v poročilu o vzpostavitvi vzajemnega informacijska postopka v zvezi z ukrepi držav članic na področju azila in priseljevanja, ki ga je sprejel Evropski parlament;
Reiterates that any decisions on relaxing rules on immigration in one Member State has a knock-on effect on the situation faced by other Member States, and that Member States have the obligation in a spirit of loyal cooperation to consult and inform other Member States of measures likely to have an impact on the immigration situation, as was stated in the report adopted by the EP on the decision on the establishment of a mutual information procedure concerning Member States' measures in the areas of asylum and immigration;
meni, da bi morala vsaka evropska strategija, ki zadeva nezakonito priseljevanje, zajemati naslednje štiri vidike: razvoj partnerstva v državah izvora in z njimi, s posebnim poudarkom na vlogi tamkajšnjih evropskih delegacij in veleposlaništev; varovanje zunanjih meja in boj proti trgovanju z ljudmi; stroga politika vračanja; vključevanje priseljencev v družbo gostiteljico;
Believes that any European strategy to address immigration should encompass the following four aspects: development of partnership in and with countries of origin, with special emphasis on the role of European delegations and embassies in countries of origin; securing external borders and the fight against human trafficking; a robust return policy; integration of migrants into the host society;
poudarja potrebo po pospeševanju razvoja ustreznih instrumentov, kot je denimo vizumski informacijski sistem (VIS);
Stresses the need to speed up the development of appropriate instruments, such as the Visa Information System (VIS);
meni, da mora biti delitev odgovornosti in finančnih bremen med državami članici sestavni del vsakega evropskega pristopa;
Believes that the sharing of responsibilities and financial burdens between Member States must be an integral part of any European approach;
zato meni, da bi moral biti državam omogočen dostop do tehnične pomoči in sredstev iz programa ARGO, Evropskega sklada za begunce, Evropskega sklada za zunanje meje, Evropskega sklada za vključevanje in Evropskega sklada za vračanje za obdobje 2007-2013;
Believes, therefore, that countries should be given access to the technical assistance and funding provided for under the ARGO programme, the European Refugee Fund, the European External Borders Fund, the European Integration Fund and the European Return Fund for the period 2007-2013;
poziva države članice, naj vzpostavijo dostop do postopka za obravnavanje prošenj za azil in naj dosledno in strogo izvršujejo določbe direktive o minimalnih standardih za pridobitev in prenehanje statusa begunca ter naj zagotovijo, da so prošnje za azil obravnavane hitro in učinkovito; meni, da je treba sprejeti minimalni skupni seznam varnih držav izvora;
Urges the Member States to establish access to the asylum application procedure and apply the provisions of the Directive on minimum standards for granting and withdrawing refugee status in a consistent and rigorous manner, and to ensure that asylum applications are processed swiftly and efficiently; believes it is important to adopt a minimum common list of safe countries of origin;
priznava, da je nujno treba sprejeti direktivo EU o vračanju, in poziva Svet, naj si še bolj prizadeva zagotoviti hitro sprejetje;
Recognises the pressing need to adopt the EU return directive, and calls on the Council to increase its efforts to ensure a swift adoption;