natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
izraža globoko zaskrbljenost ob tem, da si Ruska federacija prizadeva po diplomatski poti okrniti dejavnosti Urada za demokratične institucije in človekove pravice, in sicer s predlogi OVSE, naj zmanjša misije za opazovanje volitev, in da želi doseči prepoved za objavo njihovih poročil neposredno po volitvah; poudarja, da je imela ta organizacija pri prehodu iz totalitarnih režimov v demokratične nenadomestljivo in bistveno vlogo; poudarja, da je svoboden in pošten volilni postopek bistvo resnične in celovito delujoče demokracije in da lahko misije OVSE za opazovanje volitev bistveno prispevajo v tej smeri;
Expresses its deep concern at the diplomatic efforts by the Russian Federation to curtail the activities of the ODHIR by submitting proposals to the OSCE to cut the size of election observation missions and by prohibiting the publication of their reports immediately after an election; highlights the irreplaceable key role played by this organisation in the transition from totalitarian regimes to democratic systems; stresses that a free and fair electoral process is at the core of a genuine, fully fledged functioning democracy and that OSCE observation missions can make a decisive contribution in this direction;
poleg tega ponovno poudarja pomen vzpostavitve zgoraj omenjenega skupnega gospodarskega prostora ter nadaljnjega razvijanja ciljev, o katerih je bil dosežen dogovor v časovnem načrtu za ta prostor, zlasti kar zadeva oblikovanje odprtega trga med EU in Rusijo;
Reiterates, moreover, the importance of setting up the above-mentioned Common Economic Space (CES) and further developing the objectives agreed on in the CES road map, especially as regards the creation of an open market between the EU and Russia;
pozdravlja okrepljen dialog med EU in Rusijo o energetskih vprašanjih; poudarja pomen uvoza energije za evropska gospodarstva, saj bi to lahko bila priložnost za nadaljnje trgovinsko in gospodarsko sodelovanje med EU in Rusijo; poudarja, da bi morali biti načeli soodvisnosti in preglednosti osnova takšnega sodelovanja, prav tako kot tudi enak dostop do trgov, infrastrukture in naložb; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj zagotovita, da bodo načela Pogodbe o energetski listini, ki je po členu 45 za Rusijo zavezujoča še pred ratifikacijo v dumi Ruske federacije, in pogodbi priloženega prehodnega protokola ter sklepov G8 vključena v novi sporazum o partnerskem sodelovanju med EU in Rusijo, in da se bo nadaljevalo sodelovanje na področju energetske učinkovitosti, varčevanja z energijo in obnovljivih virov energije; poudarja, da bi ta načela morala veljati za vse večje projekte energetske infrastrukture, kot je baltski plinovod; poziva EU, naj v pogovorih z Rusijo o teh občutljivih energetskih vprašanjih nastopa enotno;
Welcomes the intensified EU-Russia dialogue on energy issues; underlines the importance of energy imports for European economies, representing as they do a potential opportunity for further trade and economic cooperation between the EU and Russia; stresses that the principles of interdependence and transparency should be the basis of such cooperation, together with equal access to markets, infrastructure and investment; calls on the Council and the Commission to ensure that the principles of the Energy Charter Treaty, which, pursuant to Article 45 thereof, is binding on Russia even prior to its ratification by the Russian State Duma, the Transit Protocol annexed thereto and the G8 conclusions are incorporated in a new PCA between the EU and Russia, including further cooperation on energy efficiency, energy saving and renewable energy; points out that these principles should be applied to major energy infrastructure projects, such as the Baltic gas pipeline; calls for the EU to speak to Russia with one voice on these sensitive energy matters;
poziva Rusko federacijo, naj veliko vlaga v ukrepe za energetsko učinkovitost, saj je treba nujno rešiti problem podnebnih sprememb in družbene koristi teh naložb; glede na to opozarja, da bi lahko z mehanizmom prilagodljivosti, določenim v Kjotskem protokolu, privabili naložbe za posodobitev ruskega energetskega sektorja in sektorja končne rabe energije;
Calls on the Russian Federation to invest heavily in energy efficiency measures, given the urgent need to address the problem of climate change and the social benefits that such investment will bring; recalls in this connection that the flexibility mechanism provided for in the Kyoto Protocol could attract investment to modernise the Russian energy and energy end-uses sector;
pozdravlja okrepljeno sodelovanje med EU in Rusijo na področju vesoljskih raziskav v okviru tristranskega dialoga, ki se je marca 2006 začel med Komisijo, Evropsko vesoljsko agencijo in rusko vesoljsko agencijo Roscosmos ter obsega vesoljske aplikacije (satelitsko navigacijo, opazovanje zemlje in satelitsko komunikacijo), dostop do vesolja (naprave za izstrelitev in prihodnje sisteme vesoljskega prometa), znanost o vesolju in razvoj vesoljske tehnologije; ugotavlja, da je bilo sodelovanje na področju vesoljskih raziskav v okviru skupnega gospodarskega prostora opredeljeno kot eden prednostnih sektorjev;
Welcomes the strengthening of EU-Russia cooperation in space in the framework of the Tripartite Space Dialogue set up in March 2006 between the Commission, the European Space Agency and Roscosmos, encompassing space applications (satellite navigation, earth observation and satellite communications), access to space (launchers and future space transportation systems), space science and space technology development; notes that within the CES, cooperation in space has been identified as a priority sector;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bil na vrhu v Mafri podpisan sporazuma o trgovini z nekaterimi izdelki iz jekla, s katerim so se povečale kvote za ploščate in dolge izdelke iz jekla, ki zdaj upoštevajo, da se je EU razširila za Bolgarijo in Romunijo, in krijejo dobavo storitvenim centrom za jeklo v državah članicah EU;
Welcomes the signing at the Mafra Summit of an agreement on trade in certain steel products, increasing the quotas for flat steel and long steel products to take into account the enlargement of the EU to include Bulgaria and Romania and to cover deliveries to steel service centres in EU Member States;
poziva obe strani, naj poiščeta rešitev za težave z izvoznimi dajatvami za les, ki bo v skladu s pravili STO;
Calls on both sides to find a solution to the timber export duty problem in accordance with WTO rules;
pozdravlja napredek, ki je bil dosežen pri izvajanju čezmejnih programov sodelovanja na osnovi načela sofinanciranja in enakega statusa pri izboru prednostnih projektov; pozdravlja zlasti napoved ruske strani na vrhu v Mafri, da je pripravljena dodeliti za te programe vsa potrebna sredstva, začenši s prvo tranšo v višini 122 000 000 EUR;
Welcomes the progress achieved in terms of the implementation of cross-border cooperation programmes based on the principle of co-financing and equal status in the selection of priority projects; welcomes in particular the announcement made by the Russian side at the Mafra Summit that it is ready to allocate the necessary funds to these programmes, starting with a first tranche of EUR 122 000 000;
poudarja, da kolone tovornjakov na evropski strani meje, dolge tudi do 50 kilometrov, niso sprejemljive in zato poziva Rusijo, naj racionalizira svoje postopke na mejah in izvaja ukrepe, za katere se je sporazumela z EU, da omili te zastoje;
Underlines that queues of trucks up to 50 km long on the EU side of the border are unacceptable and therefore calls on Russia to streamline its procedures at the borders and to implement the measures agreed with the EU to reduce these bottlenecks;
zato poziva Svet in Komisijo, da okrepita prizadevanja za odpravo težav pri prečkanju meja med EU in Rusijo, pripravita konkretne načrte in v celoti uporabita novi sosedski in partnerski instrument ter sredstva programa Interreg za čezmejno sodelovanje;
Calls, therefore, on the Council and the Commission to redouble their efforts to resolve the problems in crossing EU-Russian borders, to engage in concrete projects and to make full use of the new Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the INTERREG funds for cross-border cooperation;
obžaluje, da Rusija ni izpolnila obveznosti postopne ukinitve plačila za sibirske prelete, in jo poziva, naj podpiše sporazum, ki je bil glede tega dosežen na zadnjem vrhu, in poudarja, da bi pozitiven korak Rusije EU omogočil, da nadaljuje s pripravami na vrh o letalstvu, ki naj bi potekal v Moskvi spomladi leta 2008, in je namenjen opredelitvi neštetih možnosti za sodelovanje v tem pomembnem sektorju;
Regrets the fact that Russia did not honour its commitment to phase out Siberian overflight payments, calls on Russia to sign the agreement reached on this issue at the last summit and underlines that a positive move by Russia would allow the EU to go ahead with the Aviation Summit that is planned to take place in Moscow in spring 2008 to identify the enormous potential for cooperation in this key sector;
poziva vladi Rusije in Združenih držav Amerike, naj okrepita razprave o vprašanjih obrambe in varnosti, v katera so neposredno ali posredno vključene države članice Evropske unije; poziva vladi obeh držav, naj EU in njene države članice polno vključita v te razprave in naj se vzdržita sprejemanja korakov ali odločitev, ki bi se lahko zdeli kot grožnja miru in stabilnosti na evropski celini;
Appeals to the Governments of Russia and the United States to intensify the discussions on defence and security issues directly or indirectly involving the Member States of the European Union; urges the Governments of both States to involve the EUand its Member States fully in these discussions and to refrain from taking any steps or decisions which might be considered a threat to peace and stability on the European continent;
poziva Rusijo, naj ponovno razmisli o svojem načrtu, da začasno opusti izpolnjevanje Pogodbe o konvencionalnih oboroženih silah v Evropi, in ubere pot pogajanj, da zaščiti svoje legitimne interese in prepreči spodkopavanje te pogodbe, kar bi lahko privedlo do nove oborožitvene tekme in novih črt spopadov;
Urges Russia to reconsider plans to suspend compliance with the CFE Treaty () and to use the path of negotiations in order to protect its legitimate interests and avoid an erosion of the CFE Treaty, which could lead to a new arms race and new lines of confrontation;
poziva rusko vlado, naj pozitivno prispeva k prizadevanjem kontaktne skupine za Kosovo in EU, da bi se našla trajnostna politična rešitev za prihodnji status Kosova, ki bi bila sprejemljiva za obe strani, vpleteni v spor;
Calls on the Russian Government to make a positive contribution to the efforts of the Contact Group for Kosovo and the EU to find a sustainable, political solution for the future status of Kosovo which can be accepted by the parties involved in the conflict;
pozdravlja pobude za odpravo vizumov med EU in Rusijo; poziva k nadaljnjemu sodelovanju na področju nezakonitega priseljevanja, boljšega nadzora nad osebnimi dokumenti in boljše izmenjave informacij o terorizmu in organiziranem kriminalu; poudarja, da morata Svet in Komisija zagotoviti, da bo Rusija izpolnjevala vse pogoje, določene v sporazumih, doseženih s pogajanji o odpravi vizumov med obema stranema, da bi se izognili vsakršni kršitvi varnosti in demokracije v Evropi;
Welcomes the initiatives to achieve visa-free travel between the EU and Russia; calls for further cooperation on illegal immigration, improved checks on identity documents and better information exchange on terrorism and organised crime; emphasises that the Council and the Commission must ensure that Russia complies with all the conditions set in any negotiated agreement on the elimination of visas between the two sides, so as to prevent any breach of security and democracy in Europe;
poudarja pomen stalnega boja proti korupciji; pozdravlja sodelovanje Ruske federacije v skupini držav Sveta Evrope proti korupciji, vendar poudarja, da mednarodni sporazumi, nacionalna zakonodaja in kodeksi ravnanja brez njihovega učinkovitega izvajanja ne zadostujejo;
Stresses the importance of the continued fight against corruption; welcomes the participation of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe's Group of States against Corruption, but underlines that international conventions, national legislation and codes of conduct are not sufficient if they are not followed by effective implementation;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 14. novembra 2007 o razpravah Odbora za peticije v letu 2006 ( 2007/2132(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 14 November 2007 on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions during the year 2006 ( 2007/2132(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0392/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0392/2007 ),
ker je pravica do peticije temeljna pravica, ki je neločljivo povezana z državljanstvom Evropske unije,
whereas the right to petition is a fundamental right inextricably linked to citizenship of the European Union,
ker je pravica do peticije od leta 1992 zapisana v Pogodbi ES in je potrjena tudi v členu 44 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in členu 191 Poslovnika Evropskega parlamenta,
whereas the right to petition has been enshrined in the EC Treaty since 1992 and is confirmed in Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Rule 191 of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament,
ker Parlament, Svet in Komisijo zavezujejo določbe o pravici do peticije, zapisane v Pogodbah, in ker so se dogovorili, da bodo zagotovili nadaljnje medinstitucionalno obravnavanje peticij,
whereas Parliament, the Council and the Commission are all bound by the provisions in the Treaties on the right to petition and have agreed to guarantee the inter-institutional follow-up on petitions,
ker uresničevanje te pravice pomembno prispeva k prizadevanjem Evropske unije, da vzpostavi stik s svojimi državljani, in daje vpogled v pričakovanja evropske javnosti,
whereas the exercise of that right significantly contributes to the efforts of the European Union to reconnect with its citizens and offer an insight into the expectations of the European public,
ker so peticije sredstvo, s katerim državljani spremljajo, kako nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni organi prenašajo in izvajajo zakonodajo Skupnosti,
whereas petitions constitute a means by which citizens can contribute to the monitoring of the transposition and implementation of Community legislation by national, regional and local authorities,
ker so peticije sredstvo za ocenjevanje, kako evropska zakonodaja in politika vplivata na posameznike, ter za opozarjanje Evropskega parlamenta na dvoumnosti in nepravilno izvajanje teh zakonov in politik, kar neposredno vpliva na njihove cilje,
whereas petitions represent a tool for assessing the impact of European laws and policies on individuals and alerting the European Parliament as to the ambiguities and misapplications of those laws and policies which have a direct impact on their very goals,
ker je število nedopustnih peticij leta 2006 ostalo nespremenjeno (približno tretjina vseh peticij), kar kaže, da je treba državljane EU stalno in ustrezno obveščati o pristojnostih Evropske unije in njenih institucij,
whereas the number of petitions declared inadmissible remained constant in 2006, at about one-third of the total, reflecting a continuous need to ensure that EU citizens are properly informed about the competencies of the European Union and those of its institutions,
ker je treba priznati, da državljani EU seveda niso bili vedno zadovoljni z rezultati vloženih peticij, ki so bile označene za dopustne in obravnavane, vendar razumno število peticij vendarle prispeva k rešitvi določenega problema ali izpostavlja nekatere bojazni, ki utegnejo kasneje Parlamentu koristiti pri pogajanju o novi zakonodaji Skupnosti,
whereas it must be recorded that, naturally, not all admissible petitions received and investigated provide EU citizens with satisfaction but that a reasonable proportion of petitions do lead to the resolution of a particular problem, or highlight a particular concern, which may later serve Parliament when negotiating new Community legislation,
ker je bilo pri obravnavanju peticij pogosto ugotovljeno, da izvajanje zakonodaje Skupnosti v državah članicah ne poteka gladko, in ker obstajajo strukturne težave, povezane z izvajanjem nekaterih okoljskih standardov, zlasti člena 6 Direktive Sveta 92/43/EGS z dne 21. maja 1992 o ohranjanju naravnih habitatov ter prosto živečih živalskih in rastlinskih vrst UL L 206, 22.7.1992, str.
whereas the examination of petitions has continued to reveal persistent weaknesses in the implementation by Member States of Community law, and whereas there appear to be structural problems related to the implementation of certain environmental norms, notably Article 6 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p.
(direktiva o habitatih) ter člena 4 Direktive 85/337/EGS z dne 27. junija 1985 o presoji vplivov nekaterih javnih in zasebnih projektov na okolje UL L 175, 5.7.1985, str.
(the Habitats Directive) and Article 4 of Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment OJ L 175, 5.7.1985, p.
, kot je bila spremenjena z Direktivo Sveta 97/11/ES z dne 3. marca 1997 UL L 73, 14.3.1997, str.
, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997 OJ L 73, 14.3.1997, p.
ker se je pri nadaljnjem spremljanju peticij proti nekaterim glavnim infrastrukturnim projektom izkazalo, da bi morala Komisija dosledneje nadzorovati, kako države članice izpolnjujejo direktivo o habitatih, zlasti kadar ne izvajajo člena 6(4) te direktive in ne ohranjajo zaščitenih območij, kadar obstajajo druge možnosti za projekte, ki bi po mnenju priznanih strokovnjakov verjetno zelo negativno vplivali na celovitost območja, zaščitenega z direktivo o habitatih ali Direktivo Sveta 79/409/EGS z dne 2. aprila 1979 o ohranjanju prosto živečih ptic UL L 103, 25.4.1979, str.
whereas the follow-up to petitions against certain major infrastructure projects have shown the need for greater consistency in the Commission's monitoring of Member States' compliance with the Habitats Directive, particularly in cases of failure to apply Article 6(4) of that directive and to safeguard protected areas when alternatives exist to projects which, according to the best available scientific advice, are likely to have significant negative effects on the integrity of a site protected by the Habitats Directive or by Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p.
ker je treba v drugih primerih pohvaliti ukrepe, ki jih je Komisija sprejela pri izvajanju svojih obveznosti iz člena 211 Pogodbe ES kot "varuh Pogodb", na primer hitro odločitev za sprožitev postopka proti Španiji zaradi kršitve določb zakonodaje Skupnosti o javnih naročilih in pravočasno ukrepanje za preprečitev nepopravljive škode za okolje na Poljskem,
whereas, in other cases, the steps taken by the Commission in carrying out its duties under Article 211 of the EC Treaty as 'guardian of the Treaties' – such as the prompt decision to initiate proceedings against Spain for infringement of the rules of Community law on public procurement and the timely action taken to prevent irreversible damage to the environment in Poland – have been commendable,
ker je sodelovanje med odborom Evropskega parlamenta za peticije in Komisijo še vedno odločilno za učinkovito obravnavanje peticij in zagotavljanje najboljših rešitev za težave vlagateljev peticij,
whereas the cooperation between the Committee on Petitions and the Commission remains critical in dealing effectively with petitions and providing petitioners with the best redress to their problems,
ker je hiter odziv v primeru nepravilnega izvajanja zakonodaje Skupnosti zelo pomemben in ker je treba pri priporočanju rešitev upoštevati posebne okoliščine posameznih primerov,
whereas the promptness of the redress in cases of misapplication of Community legislation is highly important, and whereas the specific circumstances of each case should be taken into account when recommending solutions,
ker ima po členu 230 Pogodbe ES Parlament pravico, da se obrne na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet in Komisija, in ker Parlament v skladu s členom 201 te pogodbe izvaja nadzor nad dejavnostmi Komisije in ima zato na voljo tako pravna kot politična sredstva za učinkovitejši odgovor na legitimna vprašanja državljanov,
whereas, under Article 230 of the EC Treaty, Parliament has the right to bring actions before the Court of Justice of the European Communities under the same conditions as the Council and the Commission, and whereas, pursuant to Article 201 of that Treaty, Parliament is empowered to exercise control over the activities of the Commission and thus has at its disposal both the legal and the political instruments needed to respond more effectively to citizens' legitimate concerns,
ker je Parlament kljub vsemu vedno spodbujal zvesto sodelovanje, predvsem s Komisijo kot varuhom Pogodb, kot učinkovito sredstvo za odpravo težav, zaradi katerih ga državljani prosijo za pomoč,
whereas Parliament has nevertheless constantly promoted loyal cooperation, notably with the Commission as the guardian of the Treaties, as an effective means to remedy problems that have led citizens to seek its assistance,
ker Parlament še vedno prejema peticije z obtožbami, da države članice kršijo človekove in temeljne pravice vlagateljev peticij, ker člen 6(1) Pogodbe EU določa, da Unija temelji na načelih svobode, demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pravne države, in ker ima Parlament v skladu s členom 7(1) Pogodbe EU pravico, da sproži postopek za ugotavljanje, ali obstaja očitno tveganje, da država članica huje krši načela iz člena 6(1),
whereas Parliament has continued to receive petitions alleging persistent breaches by Member States of the petitioners' human and fundamental rights, whereas under Article 6(1) of the EU Treaty the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, and whereas Article 7(1) of the EU Treaty gives Parliament the right to initiate a procedure to determine whether there is a clear risk of a serious breach by a Member State of principles mentioned in Article 6(1),
ker se Parlament zaveda občutljivosti nekaterih primerov in je odločen narediti vse potrebno za zaščito pravic vlagateljev peticij in zaupnost njihovih osebnih podatkov, ne da bi bila pri tem ogrožena preglednost samega postopka obravnavanja peticij,
whereas Parliament recognises the sensitivity of certain cases and is determined to take all necessary steps to protect the rights of petitioners and the confidentiality of their personal data without undermining the transparency of the petitions process itself,
poudarja, da je postopek vlaganja peticij pomemben za zagotavljanje ustreznega odziva in rešitev za bojazni evropskih državljanov glede spoštovanja njihovih pravic v skladu s Pogodbo in zakonodajo Skupnosti;
Emphasises the significance of the petitions process in ensuring that European citizens' individual concerns about respect for their rights under the Treaty and Community legislation receive appropriate responses and solutions;
poudarja, da je Odbor za peticije bistveno prispeval k prizadevanjem Evropskega parlamenta za ponovno vzpostavitev stika z državljani EU ter za povečanje legitimnosti, preglednosti in odgovornosti v postopku odločanja v EU;
Emphasises the major contribution made by the Committee on Petitions to the work of the European Parliament aimed at reconnecting with the citizens of the EU and reinforcing the legitimacy, transparency and accountability of the EU decision-making process;