natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker šteje Uredba (ES) št. 44/2001 skupaj s svojo predhodnico Bruseljsko konvencijo za enega najuspešnejših delov zakonodaje EU; ker je postavila temelje za evropsko pravosodno območje in zadovoljevala potrebe državljanov in podjetij, saj z enotnimi evropskimi pravili pospešuje pravno varnost in predvidljivost odločitev, k čemur je prispevala obsežna sodna praksa, hkrati pa omogoča izogibanje vzporednim postopkom, zato se uporablja kot referenca in kot orodje za druge instrumente,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, with its predecessor the Brussels Convention, is one of the most successful pieces of EU legislation; whereas it laid the foundations for a European judicial area, has served citizens and business well by promoting legal certainty and predictability of decisions through uniform European rules – supplemented by a substantial body of case-law – and avoiding parallel proceedings, and is used as a reference and a tool for other instruments,
ker je bila kljub temu po nekaterih sodbah Sodišča kritizirana in bi jo bilo treba posodobiti,
whereas, notwithstanding this, it has been criticised following a number of rulings of the Court of Justice and is in need of modernisation,
ker bi odprava postopka eksekvature – glavni cilj Komisije – pospešila prosti pretok sodnih odločb in bila temelj za izgradnjo evropskega pravosodnega prostora,
whereas abolition of exequatur – the Commission's main objective – would expedite the free movement of judicial decisions and form a key milestone in the building of a European judicial area,
ker se eksekvatura redko zavrne: pravna sredstva se vložijo le zoper 1 do 5 % vlog in so le redkokdaj uspešna; ker je na enotnem trgu težko upravičiti izgubo časa in stroške, ki so povezani s priznavanjem tuje sodbe, še zlasti neprijetno pa je, ko si tožnik prizadeva za izvršbo na premoženje dolžnika po sodbi na več pristojnih sodiščih,
whereas exequatur is seldom refused: only 1 to 5% of applications are appealed and those appeals are rarely successful; whereas, nonetheless, the time and expense of getting a foreign judgment recognised are hard to justify in the single market and this may be particularly vexatious where a claimant wishes to seek enforcement against a judgment debtor's assets in several jurisdictions,
ker v več instrumentih EU ni zahteve po eksekvaturi: uredba o evropskem nalogu za izvršbo, uredba o evropskem plačilnem nalogu, uredba o evropskem postopku v sporih majhne vrednosti in uredba o preživninskih obveznostih Glej uvodno izjavo 9 v preambuli.
whereas there is no requirement for exequatur in several EU instruments: the European enforcement order, the European payment order, the European small claims procedure and the maintenance obligations regulation See the 9th recital in the preamble.
ker bi bilo treba odpravo eksekvature izpeljati pod pogojem, da je sodna odločba, ki je ustrezna, da se jo prizna in izvrši v skladu z Uredbo in je izvršljiva v državi članici, v kateri je bila izdana, izvršljiva v vsej EU; to mora spremljati izredni postopek, ki je na voljo stranki, zoper katero se zahteva izvršba, da bi ji zagotovili ustrezno pravico do ugovora na sodiščih države izvršbe, če bi ta stranka želela izpodbijati izvršbo iz razlogov iz te uredbe; ker bo treba zagotoviti, da ukrepi za izvršbo, ki so bili sprejeti pred potekom časovnega roka za vložitev zahtevka za preverjanje, ne bodo nepopravljivi,
whereas abolition of exequatur should be effected by providing that a judicial decision qualifying for recognition and enforcement under the Regulation which is enforceable in the Member State in which it was given is enforceable throughout the EU; whereas this should be coupled with an exceptional procedure available to the party against whom enforcement is sought so as to guarantee an adequate right of recourse to the courts of the State of enforcement in the event that that party wishes to contest enforcement on the grounds set out in the Regulation; whereas it will be necessary to ensure that steps taken for enforcement before the expiry of the time-limit for applying for review are not irreversible,
ker je treba ohraniti minimalne zaščitne ukrepe iz Uredbe (ES) št. 44/2001,
whereas the minimum safeguards provided for in Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 must be maintained,
ker morajo biti uradniki in rubežniki v državi članici prejemnici sposobni prepoznati, ali je dokument, na podlagi katerega se zahteva izvršba, verodostojna, pravnomočna sodba nacionalnega sodišča,
whereas officials and bailiffs in the receiving Member State must be able to tell that the document of which enforcement is sought is an authentic, final judgment from a national court,
ker arbitražo zadovoljivo obravnavata Newyorška konvencija iz leta 1958 in Ženevska konvencija o mednarodni trgovinski arbitraži iz leta 1961, ki so ju podpisale vse države članice, zato je treba ohraniti izločitev arbitraže iz področja uporabe Uredbe,
whereas arbitration is satisfactorily dealt with by the 1958 New York Convention and the 1961 Geneva Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, to which all Member States are parties, and the exclusion of arbitration from the scope of the Regulation must remain in place,
ker so določbe newyorške konvencije minimalni standardi in je pravo države pogodbenice lahko bolj naklonjeno arbitražni pristojnosti in arbitražam,
whereas the rules of the New York Convention are minimum rules and the law of the Contracting States may be more favourable to arbitral competence and arbitration awards,
ker bi poleg tega določba, ki določa, da bi sodišča države članice, v kateri je sedež arbitraže, morala biti izključno pristojna, lahko povzročila znatne motnje,
whereas, moreover, a rule providing that the courts of the Member State of the seat of the arbitration should have exclusive jurisdiction could give rise to considerable perturbations,
ker se zaradi intenzivne debate, ki jo je sprožil predlog vzpostavitve izključne sodne pristojnosti civilnih sodišč držav članic za sodne postopke, ki podpirajo arbitražo, zdi, da države članice niso dosegle skupnega stališča o tem vprašanju in da bi bilo ob upoštevanju svetovne konkurence na tem področju vsako siljenje škodljivo,
whereas it appears from the intense debate raised by the proposal to create an exclusive head of jurisdiction for court proceedings supporting arbitration in the civil courts of the Member States that the Member States have not reached a common position thereon and that it would be counterproductive, having regard to world competition in this area, to try to force their hand,
ker vsebuje zelena knjiga nasvet, da bi lahko mnoge težave v zvezi z Uredbo ublažili z boljšo komunikacijo med sodišči; ker bi bilo skoraj nemogoče sprejemati zakonodajo o boljši komunikaciji med sodniki v okviru instrumenta mednarodnega zasebnega prava, lahko pa bi jo spodbujali prek oblikovanja programa evropske pravosodne kulture z usposabljanjem in uporabo mrež (Evropska mreža za usposabljanje sodstva, Evropska mreža svetov za pravosodje, Mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč Evropske unije, Evropska pravosodna mreža v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah),
whereas the Green Paper suggests that many problems encountered with the Regulation could be alleviated by improved communications between courts; whereas it would be virtually impossible to legislate on better communication between judges in a private international law instrument, but it can be promoted as part of the creation of a European judicial culture though training and recourse to networks (European Judicial Training Network, European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, Network of the Presidents of the Supreme Courts of the EU, European Judicial Network in Civil and Commercial Matters),
ker obstaja v zvezi z osebnostnimi pravicami potreba po omejitvi možnosti izbire najugodnejšega sodišča s poudarjanjem, da smejo sodišča načeloma sprejeti pristojnost le, kadar obstaja zadostna, bistvena ali pomembna povezava z državo, v kateri je vložena tožba, saj bi s tem dosegli boljše ravnovesje med različnimi interesi, zlasti med svobodo izražanja ter pravico do dobrega imena in zasebnega življenja; ker bo problem o pravu, ki se uporablja, obravnavan posebej v zakonodajni pobudi glede Uredbe Rim II; ker bi bilo treba v spremenjeno uredbo vseeno vključiti nekaj napotkov za nacionalna sodišča,
whereas, as regards rights of the personality, there is a need to restrict the possibility for forum shopping by emphasising that, in principle, courts should accept jurisdiction only where a sufficient, substantial or significant link exists with the country in which the action is brought, since this would help strike a better balance between the interests at stake, in particular, between the right to freedom of expression and the rights to reputation and private life; whereas the problem of the applicable law will be considered specifically in a legislative initiative on the Rome II Regulation; whereas, nevertheless, some guidance should be given to national courts in the amended regulation,
spodbuja Komisijo, naj začne javno razpravo o vprašanju javne politike v povezavi z instrumenti mednarodnega zasebnega prava;
Encourages the Commission to initiate a public debate on the question of public policy in connection with private international law instruments;
meni, da mora izredni postopek iz odstavka 2 potekati v usklajenem postopkovnem časovnem okviru, s čimer bi zagotovili, da bo izveden čim hitreje; treba je tudi zagotoviti, da ukrepi za izvršbo, ki bi bili morebiti sprejeti pred potekom časovnega roka za vložitev zahtevka za izredni postopek ali pred zaključkom izrednega postopka, ne bodo nepopravljivi; je še zlasti zaskrbljen, ker tuje sodbe ne bi smeli izvršiti, če ni bila ustrezno vročena dolžniku po sodbi;
Considers that there must be a harmonised procedural time-frame for the exceptional procedure referred to in paragraph 2 so as to ensure that it is conducted as expeditiously as possible, and that it must be ensured that the steps which may be taken by way of enforcement until the time-limit for applying for the exceptional procedure has expired or the exceptional procedure has been concluded are not irreversible; is particularly concerned that a foreign judgment should not be enforced if it has not been properly served on the judgment debtor;
trdi, da je treba kot postopkovno pomoč določiti ne le zahtevo po potrdilu o verodostojnosti, da se zagotovi priznanje, pač pa da je treba določiti tudi standardno obliko potrdila; v zvezi s tem meni, da je treba izboljšati potrdilo iz Priloge V, obenem pa se, če je le mogoče, poskušati izogniti potrebi po prevodu;
Argues not only that there must be a requirement for a certificate of authenticity as a procedural aid so as to guarantee recognition, but also that there should be a standard form for that certificate; considers, to this end, that the certificate provided for in Annex V should be refined, while obviating as far as possible any need for translation;
meni, da je treba zaradi zmanjšanja stroškov prevajanje odločbe, ki jo je treba izvršiti, omejiti le na končno odločbo (izrek in povzetek obrazložitve), celotni prevod pa se zahteva le v primeru vložitve vloge za izredni postopek;
Believes that, in order to save costs, the translation of the decision to be enforced could be limited to the final order (operative part and summary grounds), but that a full translation should be required in the event that an application is made for the exceptional procedure;
meni, da bi bilo treba preživninske obveznosti s področja uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 4/2009 izločiti iz področja uporabe Uredbe, toda ponovno poudarja, da bi končni cilj moral biti izčrpen korpus predpisov, ki bi obsegal vse obravnavane zadeve;
Considers that maintenance obligations within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 4/2009/EC should be excluded from the scope of the Regulation, but reiterates that the final aim should be a comprehensive body of law encompassing all subject-matters;
je odločno proti (tudi delni) odpravi izločitve arbitraže iz področja uporabe;
Strongly opposes the (even partial) abolition of the exclusion of arbitration from the scope;
meni, da bi člen 1(2)(d) Uredbe moral jasno določati, da so iz področja uporabe Uredbe izvzeti ne le postopki arbitraže, temveč tudi sodni postopki, ki kot glavno ali stransko stvar ali predhodno vprašanje obravnavajo veljavnost ali obseg pristojnosti arbitraže; nadalje meni, da bi bilo treba členu 31 dodati odstavek, ki bi določal, da se sodba ne prizna, če je sodišče države članice izvora pri odločanju o vprašanju v zvezi z veljavnostjo ali obsegom klavzule o arbitraži spregledalo določbo arbitražnega prava države članice, v kateri se zahteva izvršba, razen če ima sodba tiste države članice enak izid kot v primeru, če bi se uporabila določba arbitražnega prava države članice, v kateri se zahteva izvršba;
Considers that Article 1(2)(d) of the Regulation should make it clear that not only arbitration proceedings, but also judicial procedures ruling on the validity or extent of arbitral competence as a principal issue or as an incidental or preliminary question, are excluded from the scope of the Regulation; further considers that a paragraph should be added to Article 31 providing that a judgment shall not be recognised if, in giving its decision, the court in the Member State of origin has, in deciding a question relating to the validity or extent of an arbitration clause, disregarded a rule of the law of arbitration in the Member State in which enforcement is sought, unless the judgment of that Member State produces the same result as if the law of arbitration of the Member State in which enforcement is sought had been applied;
meni, da bi bilo treba tudi to pojasniti v uvodni izjavi;
Considers that this should also be clarified in a recital;
meni, da bi Uredba morala vsebovati novo določbo, ki bi obravnavala možnost, da tretja stran ugovarja sporazumom o izbiri sodišča; meni, da bi taka določba lahko določala, da osebo, ki ni stranka pogodbe, zavezuje izključni sporazum o izbiri sodišča, sklenjen v skladu z Uredbo, le, če: (a) je ta sporazum vsebovan v pisnem dokumentu ali elektronskem zapisu; (b) je ta oseba pravočasno in ustrezno obveščena o sodišču, na katerega je treba vložiti tožbo; (c) pri pogodbah o prevozu blaga, je izbrano sodišče (i) v kraju prebivališča prevoznika; (ii) v kraju sprejema, dogovorjenem v pogodbi o prevozu; (iii) v kraju dostave, dogovorjenem v pogodbi o prevozu, ali (iv) v pristanišču, kjer je blago najprej naloženo na ladjo, ali v pristanišču, kjer je blago dokončno raztovorjeno z ladje; meni, da bi moralo biti prav tako določeno, da lahko v vseh drugih primerih tretja stran vloži tožbo na sodišču, ki je sicer pristojno v skladu z Uredbo, če je očitno, da bi bilo vztrajanje pri tem, da se tretja stran drži izbranega sodišča, očitno nepravično;
Considers that the Regulation should contain a new provision dealing with the opposability of choice-of-court agreements against third parties; takes the view that such provision could provide that a person who is not a party to the contract will be bound by an exclusive choice-of-court agreement concluded in accordance with the Regulation only if: (a) that agreement is contained in a written document or electronic record; (b) that person is given timely and adequate notice of the court where the action is to be brought; (c) in contracts for carriage of goods, the chosen court is (i) the domicile of the carrier; (ii) the place of receipt agreed in the contract of carriage; (iii) the place of delivery agreed in the contract of carriage, or (iv) the port where the goods are initially loaded on a ship or the port where the goods are finally discharged from a ship; considers that it should further be provided that, in all other cases, the third party may bring an action before the court otherwise competent under the Regulation if it appears that holding that party to the chosen forum would be blatantly unfair;
po eni strani meni, da vprašanje, ali dati določbam Uredbe vzajemni učinek, ni bilo izčrpno obravnavano, in da bi bilo prenagljeno sprejeti tak ukrep brez temeljite preučitve, obširnih posvetovanj in politične razprave, v kateri bi moral imeti Parlament vodilno vlogo, ter poziva Komisijo, naj sproži ta proces; po drugi strani pa meni, da je zaradi obstoja velikega števila dvostranskih sporazumov med državami članicami in tretjimi državami ter vprašanj vzajemnosti in mednarodnih prijateljskih odnosov problem globalen, rešitev pa bi bilo treba sočasno poiskati v okviru Haaške konference, in sicer z nadaljevanjem pogajanj o konvenciji o mednarodnih sodbah; pooblašča Komisijo, da si po najboljših močeh prizadeva za oživitev tega projekta, ki bi ga lahko imenovali sveti Graal mednarodnega zasebnega prava; poziva Komisijo, naj razišče, do kolikšne mere bi lahko lugansko konvencijo UL L 147, 10.6.2009, str.
Considers, on the one hand, that the question whether the rules of the Regulation should be given reflexive effect has not been sufficiently considered and that it would be premature to take this step without much study, wide-ranging consultations and political debate, in which Parliament should play a leading role, and encourages the Commission to initiate this process; considers, on the other hand, that, in view of the existence of large numbers of bilateral agreements between Member States and third countries, questions of reciprocity and international comity, the problem is a global one and a solution should also be sought in parallel in the Hague Conference through the resumption of negotiations on an international judgments convention; mandates the Commission to use its best endeavours to revive this project, the Holy Grail of private international law; urges the Commission to explore the extent to which the 2007 Lugano Convention OJ L 147, 10.6.2009, p.
iz leta 2007 uporabili kot model in navdih za takšno konvencijo o mednarodnih sodbah;
could serve as a model and inspiration for such an international judgments convention;
zagovarja spremembo Uredbe, s čimer bi omogočili, da bi izključna izbira določb sodišča delovala vzajemno v korist sodišč tretjih držav;
Advocates amending the Regulation to allow reflexive effect to be given to exclusive choice-of-court clauses in favour of third States' courts;
Opredelitev kraja prebivališča fizičnih in pravnih oseb
Definition of domicile of natural and legal persons
meni, da bi bila neodvisna evropska opredelitev (ki bi jo bilo mogoče uporabiti v vseh evropskih pravnih instrumentih) kraja prebivališča fizičnih oseb zaželena, zlasti zato, da bi se izognili situacijam, ko imajo lahko ljudje več kot en kraj prebivališča;
Takes the view that an autonomous European definition (ultimately applicable to all European legal instruments) of the domicile of natural persons would be desirable, in order in particular to avoid situations in which persons may have more than one domicile;
zavrača enotno opredelitev sedeža podjetij v okviru uredbe Bruselj I, saj bi bilo treba o opredelitvi s tako daljnosežnimi posledicami razpravljati in se o njej dogovoriti v okviru razvoja evropskega prava družb;
Rejects a uniform definition of the domicile of companies within the Brussels I Regulation, since a definition with such far-reaching consequences should be discussed and decided within the scope of a developing European company law;
meni, da bi morali z Uredbo določiti pravilo, ki bi preprečevalo, da bi sodišče, ki izda sklep o razglasitvi izvršljivosti, zavrnilo uveljavitev samodejnih pravil sodišča države izvora glede obrestnih mer in namesto tega uporabilo nacionalne obrestne mere zgolj od datuma odobritve zahtevka za izvršitev v okviru izrednega postopka;
Considers that the Regulation should lay down a rule so as to preclude an enforcing court from declining to give effect to the automatic rules on interest rates of the court of the State of origin and applying instead its national interest rate only from the date of the order authorising enforcement under the exceptional procedure;
meni, da bi bilo treba odpraviti terminološko neskladje med Uredbo (ES) št. 593/2008 (Rim I) Uredba (ES) št. 593/2008 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbene obveznosti („Rim I“) (UL L 177, 4.7.2008, str.
Considers that the terminological inconsistencies between Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 (‘Rome I’) Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (OJ L 177, 4.7.2008, p.
in Uredbo (ES) št. 44/2001, tako da bi v člen 15(1) uredbe Bruselj I vključili opredelitev „strokovnjaka“, vsebovano v členu 6(1) uredbe Rim I, ter zamenjali izraz „pogodbe, po katerih cena vključuje kombinacijo prevoza in namestitve“ v členu 15(3) uredbe Bruselj I s sklicevanjem na Direktivo 90/314/EGS o paketnem potovanju Direktiva Sveta 90/314/EGS z dne 13. junija 1990 o paketnem potovanju, organiziranih počitnicah in izletih (UL L 158, 23.6.1990, str.
and Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 should be eliminated by including in Article 15(1) of the Brussels I Regulation the definition of ‘professional’ incorporated in Article 6(1) of the Rome I Regulation and by replacing the expression ‘contract which, for an inclusive price, provides for a combination of travel and accommodation’ in Article 15(3) of the Brussels I Regulation by a reference to the Package Travel Directive 90/314/EEC Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ L 158, 23.6.1990, p.
, kot je to urejeno v točki 6(4)(b) uredbe Rim I;
as in Article 6(4)(b) of the Rome I Regulation;
poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju sodne prakse Sodišča razmisli o tem, ali ni mogoče poiskati rešitve, s katero bi tistim zaposlenim, ki ne opravljajo dela v zgolj eni državi članici (npr. vozniki tovornjakov na dolge razdalje, stevardi in stevardese) zagotovili večjo pravno varnost in ustrezno zaščito bolj ranljivi stranki;
Calls on the Commission to consider, having regard to the case-law of the Court of Justice, whether a solution affording greater legal certainty and suitable protection for the more vulnerable party might not be found for employees who do not carry out their work in a single Member State (e.g. long distance lorry drivers, flight attendants);
meni, da je treba za zagotovitev boljšega dostopa do sodnega varstva, odredbe, katerih namen je pridobitev informacij in dokazov ali zavarovanje dokazov, vključiti v pojem začasnih in zaščitnih ukrepov;
Considers that, in order to ensure better access to justice, orders aimed at obtaining information and evidence or at preserving evidence should be covered by the notion of provisional and protective measures;
meni, da bi Uredba za take ukrepe morala določati pristojnost države članice, kjer se nahajajo zahtevane informacije ali dokazi, poleg pristojnosti sodišč, ki so pristojna za vsebinsko odločanje;
Believes that the Regulation should establish jurisdiction for such measures at the courts of the Member State where the information or evidence sought is located, in addition to the jurisdiction of the courts having jurisdiction with respect to the substance;
zavrača zamisel Komisije, da bi sodišče, pred katerim poteka glavni postopke, lahko zavrnilo, spremenilo ali prilagodilo začasni ukrep, ki ga je izdalo sodišče druge države članice, saj to ne bi bilo skladno z duhom načela vzajemnega zaupanja iz Uredbe; poleg tega meni, da ni jasno, na kakšni podlagi bi sodišče lahko ponovno preverilo odločitev sodišča drugega območja, in katero pravo bi se v teh okoliščinah uporabilo, to bi pa lahko povzročilo dejanske praktične težave, denimo v zvezi s stroški;
Rejects the Commission's idea that the court seised of the main proceedings should be able to discharge, modify or adapt provisional measures granted by a court from another Member State since this would not be in the spirit of the principle of mutual trust established by the Regulation; considers, moreover, that it is unclear on what basis a court could review a decision made by a court in a different jurisdiction and which law would apply in these circumstances, and that this could give rise to real practical problems, for example with regard to costs;
Kolektivne odškodnine
Collective redress