natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je treba v zvezi z vročitvijo naloga za zaplembo zagotoviti oblikovanje enotnih standardov (npr. uporaba standardnih obrazcev) za komunikacijo med sodišči in bankami v Evropski uniji;
Maintains, as regards the service of attachment orders, that uniform standards need to be laid down within the EU to govern communication between courts and banks (for example by using standard forms);
meni, da je treba naloge za zaplembo prenesti tako, da se zagotovi vročitev naloga banki na dan po prenosu in jih obdelati jih v 24 urah po identifikaciji računa; banka mora pristojni organ in upnika uradno obvestiti o tem, ali je bil določen znesek zavarovan; banka mora uradno obvestiti tudi dolžnika o začetku veljavnosti naloga za zaplembo; zaželena so standardizirana formalna obvestila, ki naj so na voljo v vseh jezikih Evropske unije s čimer se i odstrani ali zmanjša potrebo po posebnem prevajanju;
Is of the opinion that attachment orders should be transmitted by means that guarantee service upon the bank by the first day after transmission and processed within 24 hours of identification of the account; believes that the bank should be required formally to notify the enforcement authority and the creditor as to whether the amount liable has been secured; believes that the bank should also be required formally to notify the debtor when the attachment order becomes effective; considers that it would be desirable for standardised formal notices to be available in all official languages of the European Union, thereby eliminating or reducing the need for customised translations;
meni, da je treba za izvedbo zgoraj navedenega oblikovati ustrezen pravni akt, po možnosti v obliki uredbe;
Considers that the legal act required for the above purposes might need to take the form of a regulation;
poziva Komisijo, da pojasni odprta in delno zapletena vprašanja pred predložitvijo predloga s temeljito in obsežno študijo ter izvede zlasti oceno učinka;
Calls on the Commission, before it submits any proposal, to clear up the – in some cases thorny – unresolved issues by conducting detailed, wide-ranging studies, and in particular to carry out a legislative impact assessment;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. oktobra 2007 o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2006 ( 2007/2131(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 October 2007 on the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2006 ( 2007/2131(INI) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2006,
having regard to the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2006,
ob upoštevanju členov 195, 230 in 232 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 195, 230 and 232 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 43 Listine o temeljnih človekovih pravicah Evropske Unije,
having regard to Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 6. septembra 2001 o spremembi člena 3 prepisov in splošnih pogojev, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic UL C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
having regard to its resolution of 6 September 2001 amending Article 3 of the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju okvirnega sporazuma o sodelovanju, ki sta ga sklenila Evropski parlament in varuh človekovih pravic dne 15. marca 2006 in je začel veljati dne 1. aprila 2006,
having regard to the framework agreement on cooperation concluded between the European Parliament and the Ombudsman on 15 March 2006, which entered into force on 1 April 2006,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2005 v zvezi s pooblastilom za sprejetje in posredovanje sporočil Evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in za nastop javnih uradnikov pred njim ( SEK(2005)1227 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 5 October 2005 on 'Empowerment to adopt and transmit communications to the European Ombudsman and authorise civil servants to appear before the European Ombudsman' ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
ob upoštevanju pisma Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta z dne 11. julija 2006, katerega namen je bila revizija statuta,
having regard to the letter of 11 July 2006 sent by the European Ombudsman to the President of the European Parliament with a view to initiating the procedure for the revision of the Ombudsman's Statute,
ob upoštevanju druge in tretje povedi člena 195(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 195(2), second and third sentences, of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A6-0301/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0301/2007 ),
ker je bilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2006 uradno posredovano predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta dne 12. marca 2007 in ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamandouros predstavil svoje poročilo Odboru za peticije dne 2. maja 2007 v Bruslju,
whereas the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2006 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 12 March 2007 and whereas the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 2 May 2007,
ker ima po členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah "vsakdo ... pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku",
whereas, under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, 'every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union',
ker ima po členu 195(1) Pogodbe ES in po členu 43 Listine o temeljnih pravicah "vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic…pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij in organov Skupnosti obrne na varuha človekovih pravic Unije, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji'',
whereas, under Article 195(1) of the EC Treaty and Article 43 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role,
ker je zaradi vedno bolj participativne demokracije v Evropi in boljšega informiranja državljanov Evropske unije o njej nujno, da državljani dobijo od institucij in evropskih organov hitre in konkretne odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije in ker je bistveno, da imajo te institucije in organi na voljo potrebna proračunska sredstva in človeške vire, da se zagotovi, da državljani dejansko prejmejo hitre in konkretne odgovore,
whereas it is essential, in the context of increasing participatory democracy in Europe and of better communicating the European Union to its citizens, that citizens receive from the European institutions and bodies prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions, and whereas it is essential that those institutions and bodies be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive such prompt and substantive responses,
ker se druge glavne institucije Unije kljub temu, da je minilo že poldrugo mandatno obdobje od sprejetja resolucije, s katero je Parlament dne 6. septembra 2001 sprejel Evropski kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, še niso odzvale na nujen poziv, da svojo prakso uskladijo z določbami omenjenega kodeksa,
whereas, although one parliamentary term has come to an end since the adoption of the resolution of 6 September 2001 in which Parliament approved the European Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Practice, and the next parliamentary term has run half its course, the other main Union institutions have not yet complied with Parliament's urgent request to bring their practice into line with the provisions of that code,
ker več kot tri četrtine pritožb v letu 2006 ni sodilo v obseg pooblastil varuha človekovih pravic, v glavnem zato, ker niso bile usmerjene zoper institucijo ali organ Skupnosti, čeprav se je število pritožb ustalilo na že prej visoki stopnji iz leta 2004,
whereas in 2006, although the number of complaints stabilised at the high level reached in 2004, over three-quarters of them still fell outside the Ombudsman's remit, mainly because they did not concern a Community institution or body,
ker iz opravljenih preiskav izhaja, da v 95 primerih (oziroma v 26 % obravnavanih primerov) ni bilo mogoče ugotoviti nepravilnosti,
whereas, in 95 cases (or 26% of the cases examined) the Ombudsman's enquiries revealed no maladministration,
ker morajo ostati dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije ločene in bi si morala z namenom, da se preprečijo spori v zvezi s pristojnostjo, vzajemno posredovati zadevne primere,
whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions must remain separate and as a general rule, to avoid conflicts as regards their respective prerogatives, should include reciprocal definitive referral of their respective files,
ker je leta 2006 znatno upadlo število primerov nepravilnosti, ki so bile rešene sporazumno, po drugi strani pa se je precej povečalo število preiskav, ki so se končale s kritičnimi pripombami, in znižalo število s strani institucij sprejetih priporočil,
whereas the year 2006 saw a significant decline in the number of cases of maladministration in which an amicable settlement was reached, accompanied by an equally striking rise in the number of enquiries closed with a critical remark, and a lower rate of acceptance of the Ombudsman's draft recommendations by the institutions,
ker niti kritične pripombe, ki jih vsebujejo sklepi ob nerazrešljivih primerih nepravilnosti, niti priporočila ali morebitna posebna poročila niso zavezujoča, saj pooblastila varuha človekovih pravic obsegajo zgolj področje spodbujanja samonadzora institucij in organov Evropske unije, ne sežejo pa na neposredno odpravljanje primerov nepravilnosti,
whereas neither the critical remarks contained in decisions closing irremediable cases of maladministration, nor recommendations or special reports by the Ombudsman have binding effect, as his powers do not extend to directly remedying instances of maladministration, but are intended to encourage self-regulation on the part of the European Union's institutions and bodies,
ker je predstavitev posebnega poročila v Evropskem parlamentu edina možnost posredovanja v primeru, ko institucija noče upoštevati priporočil varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas submitting a special report to the European Parliament remains the Ombudsman's ultimate means of taking action when an institution refuses to comply with a recommendation by the Ombudsman,
ker ima od začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe iz Nice Parlament enako pravico kot države članice, Svet in Komisija, da se obrne na Sodišče evropskih skupnosti zaradi nepristojnosti, bistvene kršitve postopka, kršitev Pogodbe ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila, ki se nanaša na njeno uporabo, ali zaradi zlorabe pooblastil,
whereas since the entry into force of the Treaty of Nice Parliament has enjoyed the same right as the Member States, the Council and the Commission to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers,
ker je leta 2006 varuh človekovih pravic s tem, ko je Parlamentu predstavil dve posebni poročili Posebno poročilo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu, ki je sledilo osnutku priporočila Svetu Evropske unije v zvezi s pritožbo 1487/2005/GG in Posebno poročilo Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu, ki je sledilo osnutku priporočila Evropski komisiji v zvezi s pritožbo 289/2005/(WP)GG
whereas in 2006 the Ombudsman, by submitting two special reports Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the Council of the European Union in complaint 1487/2005/GG and Special Report from the European Ombudsman to the European Parliament following the draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 289/2005/(WP)GG.
po tem, ko sta Svet in Komisija zavrnila pomemben osnutek priporočila, svoja pooblastila uporabljal premišljeno,
to Parliament after the rejection of the relevant draft recommendation by the Council and the Commission, made judicious use of his powers,
ker je potrebno nov pristop varuha človekovih pravic do Komisije, katerega del je spodbujanje storitvene kulture kot sestavnega dela dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev in je nepogrešljivo sredstvo za spreminjanje nepravilnega dejanja ali ravnanja v ustrezno, treba izvajati soglasno in od spodaj navzgor,
whereas the Ombudsman's new approach to the Commission, which consists of promoting a culture of service as an integral component of good administrative practice and a key means of remedying flawed actions or conduct, must be implemented from the bottom up on a consensual basis,
ker lahko kritične pripombe Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v 41 primerih slabega upravljanja iz poročila za leto 2006 (kritične pripombe, osnutki priporočil in posebna poročila) služijo tudi za to, da se v prihodnosti ne bi ponovile napake in nepravilnosti, tako da institucije in druge organizacije EU sprejmejo in izvajajo potrebne ukrepe,
whereas the critical comments voiced by the European Ombudsman in respect of 41 cases of maladministration contained in the 2006 report (critical observations, draft recommendations and special reports) may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future by the taking and implementation of appropriate measures by the institutional and other bodies of the EU,
ker prostovoljno sodelovanje, ki ga je uvedel varuh človekovih pravic pod okriljem evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, že več kot deset let deluje kot prožen sistem izmenjave informacij, izkušenj o najboljših upravnih praksah in za usmerjanje prijaviteljev k varuhu človekovih pravic ter k drugim podobnim organizacijam, ki jim lahko najbolje pomagajo,
whereas the voluntary cooperation established by the Ombudsman in the European Network of Ombudsmen has functioned for over ten years as a flexible system for exchanging information and best practice and as a means of directing complainants to the Ombudsmen or other similar bodies most able to assist them,
ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic, to je varovanje evropskih državljanov, tako zaradi njegove neodvisnosti kot zaradi demokratičnega nadzora nad preglednostjo njegovega delovanja, ki ga izvaja Parlament, po več kot desetletju od začetka delovanja nadalje razvila,
whereas the role of Ombudsman charged with protecting European citizens has evolved in the decade or more since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and Parliament's democratic scrutiny of the transparency of his activities,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic izjavil, da je pripravljen uporabiti svojo pristojnost izvajanja preiskave na lastno pobudo, kadar državljani tretjih držav izven Evropske unije pri varuhu človekovih pravic vložijo pritožbo, ki sicer sodi v okvir njegovih pooblastil,
whereas the Ombudsman has declared that he is willing to use his powers of own-initiative inquiries when third-country citizens resident outside the EU address a complaint to the Ombudsman which in other respects falls within his mandate,
ker sta varuh človekovih pravic in Evropski nadzornik za varstvo osebnih podatkov dne 30. novembra 2006 podpisala Memorandum o soglasju v zvezi s sodelovanjem in načinom izvajanja svojih pooblastil,
whereas on 30 November 2006 the Ombudsman and the Data Protection Supervisor signed a Memorandum of Understanding concerning cooperation and the modalities of the exercise of their respective powers,
ker je med vodilnimi načeli evropskega vključevanja tudi načelo demokratične enakosti vseh evropskih državljanov brez narodnostne ali jezikovne diskriminacije in ker državljani, organizacije in podjetja še vedno vlagajo številne pritožbe, ker v postopkih za oddajo javnega naročila oziroma razpisnih postopkih Skupnosti niso dobili zahtevanih informacij v svojem jeziku,
whereas one of the fundamental principles of European integration is the democratic equality of all European citizens, without any discrimination on the grounds of nationality or language, and whereas there are still numerous complaints from citizens, associations or firms about their failure to receive the information they requested in their own language in connection with Community tender or competition procedures,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic julija 2006 ponovno vložil zahtevo za revizijo svojega statuta in ker je Evropski parlament na podlagi omenjene resolucije z dne 6. septembra 2001 že sprejel del njegovih zahtev, ki zadevajo spremembo člena 3 tega statuta,
whereas the Ombudsman reiterated, in July 2006, his call for the Statute of the Ombudsman to be amended and whereas one of his requests, for the amendment of Article 3 of the Statute, has already been approved by the European Parliament on the basis of its abovementioned resolution of 6 September 2001,
odobri letno poročilo za leto 2006, ki ga je predstavil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, ceni predstavitev konsolidiranega modela povzetka ocene opravljenih dejavnosti in tematske analize odločitev in težav, ki nastajajo v različnih fazah postopka; vendar poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj uporabi tehnične rešitve, ki bodo olajšale branje različnih poglavij, kot so statistične preglednice in povzetki analitičnega dela;
Approves the annual report for 2006 submitted by the European Ombudsman, and approves the form in which it is presented, combining a summary of the year's activities and a thematic analysis of the Ombudsman's decisions and the problems raised at various stages of the procedure; calls on the Ombudsman, however, to introduce technical changes to make it easier to read the various chapters, such as tables for the statistics and summaries for the analytical section;
poziva, naj se vsem evropskim institucijam in organom namenijo potrebna proračunska sredstva in človeški viri, da se zagotovi, da državljani dobijo hitre in konkretne odgovore v zvezi s svojimi poizvedovanji, pritožbami in peticijami;
Calls for all European institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic opravljal dejavnosti v okviru svojih pooblastil uravnoteženo in dinamično, kar velja za pregled in obravnavo pritožb, potek in zaključek preiskav, ohranjanje konstruktivnih odnosov z institucijami in organi Evropske unije ter osveščanje državljanov, da od teh institucij in organizacij zahtevajo spoštovanje svojih pravic;
Considers that the Ombudsman has continued to exercise his powers in a balanced and energetic way both with regard to examining and handling complaints, and conducting and concluding enquiries, and with regard to maintaining constructive relations with the European Union's institutions and bodies and encouraging citizens to avail themselves of their rights in relation to those institutions and bodies;
spodbuja Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, naj nadaljuje s svojimi prizadevanji ter organizira svoje dejavnosti učinkovito in prilagodljivo, da bo v očeh državljanov veljal za varuha dobrega upravljanja v institucijah Skupnosti;
Encourages the European Ombudsman to pursue his efforts and to promote his activities effectively and flexibly so that, in the eyes of citizens, he represents the custodian of sound administration in the Community institutions;
poudarja, da je glavni namen posredovanja varuha človekovih pravic, da poišče sporazumno spravo med pritožnikom in institucijo in tako prepreči spor pred sodiščem;
Stresses that a key purpose of any intervention by the Ombudsman is to seek an amicable settlement between the complainant and the institution and to prevent a dispute before the courts;
se strinja s širšim pojmovanjem izraza ''nepravilnosti pri dejavnostih institucij ali organov Skupnosti'', ki se ne nanaša samo na nezakonite dejavnosti pri upravljanju ali kršitve zavezujočih pravnih predpisov ali načel, temveč na primer tudi na primere nedejavnega, malomarnega ali nepreglednega upravljanja in na kršitve drugih načel dobrega upravljanja;
Agrees that the term 'maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies' should be broadly interpreted so as to include not only unlawful administrative acts or infringements of binding legal rules or principles but also, for example, cases where the administrative authorities have been slothful, negligent or lacking in transparency or have infringed other principles of good administration;
spodbuja varuha človekovih pravic, naj si še naprej prizadeva za pristno storitveno kulturo kot sestavni del dobre upravne prakse, da se zagotovi pripravljenost javne uprave Evropske unije na odprtost in dialog z državljani-uporabniki, na priznavanje napak, na opravičilo zanje in na iskanje zadovoljivih rešitev za pritožnika;
Encourages the Ombudsman to continue to promote a genuine culture of service as an integral component of good administrative practice in order to ensure that the European Union's public administration is geared towards openness and dialogue with members of the public using their services, recognising and apologising for mistakes and seeking satisfactory solutions for complainants;
meni, da ni zadovoljivo, da so nekatere druge institucije in organi skupnosti, predvsem Komisija in Svet, sprejeli ločene kodekse dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev (Komisija je 13. septembra 2000 sprejela kodeks za odnose svojega osebja z javnostjo, Svet pa 25. junija 2001 kodeks za profesionalne odnose svojega osebja z javnostjo);
Considers that it is not enough that some of the other institutions and Community bodies, primarily the Commission and the Council, have adopted separate codes of good administrative conduct (in the case of the Commission, the code of 13 September 2000 covering its staff's relations with the public, and in the case of the Council, the code of 25 June 2001 on its staff's professional relations with the public);
poudarja, da se ''Evropski kodeks dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev'', ki ga je predložil Evropski varuh človekovih pravic in ga je Parlament odobril 6. septembra 2001, nanaša na osebje vseh institucij in organov Skupnosti in da se ga za razliko od drugih kodeksov redno posodablja in objavlja na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic;
Notes that the 'European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour' proposed by the European Ombudsman, and approved by the European Parliament on 6 September 2001, covers the staff of all Community institutions and bodies and, unlike the other codes, has been regularly updated and published on the Ombudsman's website;
spodbuja institucije h konstruktivnemu sodelovanju z varuhom človekovih pravic na vseh stopnjah postopka, k sprejemanju sporazumnih rešitev, k nadaljnjemu ukrepanju na podlagi varuhovih kritičnih pripomb in k izvajanju varuhovih osnutkov priporočil;
Urges all the institutions to cooperate constructively with the Ombudsman at all stages of the procedure, to abide by amicable settlements, to follow up his critical remarks and to apply his draft recommendations;
spodbuja varuha človekovih pravic, naj vsako leto pripravi seznam najboljše upravne prakse in seznam upravnih praks, ki niso skladne z njegovimi sklepi, in naj predstavi raziskavo o rezultatih nadaljnjega ukrepanja na podlagi njegovih kritičnih pripomb;
Encourages the Ombudsman to draw up a list every year of best administrative practices and a list of practices which are not consonant with his decisions, and to present a study of the outcome of his critical comments;