natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
H. ker sporazum o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju omogoča plovilom iz 12 držav članic ribolov v mavretanskih vodah in je za EU gospodarsko in finančno najpomembnejši sporazum o ribištvu,
H. whereas the FPA allows community vessels from 12 Member States to fish in Mauritanian waters and is economically as well as financially the most important fisheries agreement for the EU,
I. ker je ribolov eden od najpomembnejših virov prihodka za mavretansko gospodarstvo, saj predstavlja približno 10 % nacionalnega BDP ter med 35 % in 50 % mavretanskega izvoza, hkrati pa zagotavlja 29 % prihodkov za nacionalni proračun;
I. whereas fishing is one of the most important sources of income to the Mauritanian economy accounting for about 10% of national GDP and between 35% and 50 % of Mauritanian exports while providing 29 % of the income for the national budget,
3. poziva Komisijo, naj v letnih znanstvenih poročilih, ki jih skladno z določbami člena 3(4)a veljavnega protokola pripravlja skupni znanstveni odbor, zagotovi povzetek ugotovitev;
Calls on the Commission to provide a summary of the findings in the annual scientific reports prepared by the Joint Scientific Committee as foreseen by the current Protocol in Article 3(4)a;
13. priporoča Komisiji, naj v novi protokol vključi možnost zagotavljanja usposabljanja mavretanskih strokovnjakov, s čimer bi podprli razvoj strukturne ribiške politike in nacionalne infrastrukture;
Recommends to the Commission - as part of the new Protocol - to include the option of offering training to Mauritanian experts so as to support the development of structural fisheries policy and national infrastructure;
16. priporoča Komisiji, naj si na naslednjih pogajanjih prizadeva za vzpostavitev sistema prenosljivih kvot, ki bi temeljil na znanstvenih ocenah in nadomestil sedanji sistem dovoljenj, s čimer bi vzpostavili boljši nadzor nad čezmernim izkoriščanjem virov;
Recommends that in the upcoming negotiations the Commission strive for the instalment of a system of transferable quotas based on scientific assessments replacing the current licence-based system so as to gain better control over the overexploitation of resources;
o sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Mavretanijo
on the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Mauritania
PE459.743v01-00 B7‑0197/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju med Evropsko unijo in Mavretanijo
PE459.743v02-00 B7‑0197/2011/rev. European Parliament resolution on the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Mauritania
A. ker morajo sporazumi o partnerstvu v ribiškem sektorju temeljiti na doseganju gospodarskih in družbenih ciljev v ribištvu, prek tesnega sodelovanja na znanstvenem in tehničnem področju in v razmerah, ki zagotavljajo trajnostno izkoriščanje ribolovnih virov,
A. whereas fisheries partnership agreements must be based on the achievement of economic and social objectives in fishing-related areas through close scientific and technical cooperation, under conditions that safeguard the sustainable exploitation of fish stocks,
B. ker mora za zagotovitev politične usklajenosti sodelovanje temeljiti na vzajemnem interesu in dopolnjevanju pobud in ukrepov, tako skupnih kot tistih, ki jih izvaja vsaka posamezna stran,
B. whereas cooperation must be based on mutual interest and take the form of initiatives and measures which, whether taken jointly or separately, are complementary and ensure consistent policies,
C. ker igra ribiški sektor skupaj s povezano industrijo pomembno vlogo v gospodarskem in družbenem razvoju tretjih držav in držav članic,
C. whereas the fisheries sector and related industries play an important role in the economic and social development of both third countries and the Member States,
D. ker je ribiški sektor izjemno pomemben za mavretansko gospodarstvo, saj predstavlja 10 % BDP in 35-50 % izvoza iz te države, prispevki v nacionalni proračun pa znašajo 29 %,
D. whereas the fisheries sector is extremely important to Mauritania's economy, representing 10% of the country's GDP and between 35 and 50% of its exports, and contributing 29% of national budget revenue,
E. ker je v ribiškem sektorju v Mavretaniji neposredno in posredno zaposlenih okrog 45.000 ljudi, kar je 36 % vseh delovnih mest v državi, pri čemer je 31 % teh delovnih mest v malem ribolovu, 12 % pa v industrijskem ribolovu,
E. whereas the fisheries sector in Mauritania generates around 45 000 jobs, directly and indirectly, and accounts for 36% of the country's total employment, with 31% of these jobs stemming from artisanal fishing and 12% from industrial fishing,
F. ker ima EU že od leta 1987 z Mavretanijo sklenjene sporazume na področju ribištva in ker so ti sporazumi po letu 1996 s sporazumom o sodelovanju pridobili pomembno sodelovalno razsežnost, ki vključuje izrecne cilje glede sodelovanja na področju trajnostnega razvoja ribištva v Mavretaniji,
F. whereas the EU has had fisheries agreements with Mauritania since 1987 and from 1996 onwards, under the Cooperation Agreement, these agreements have taken on a significant dimension of cooperation, including explicit objectives in the area of cooperation for the sustainable development of the fisheries sector in Mauritania,
G. ker je sporazum o ribištvu med EU in Mavretanijo v finančnem smislu najpomembnejši ribiški sporazum, ki ga je podpisala EU,
G. whereas in financial terms the Fisheries Agreement between the EU and Mauritania is the most important of all the fisheries agreements signed by the EU,
H. ker različni načini podpore, določeni v različnih sporazumih o ribištvu med EU in Mavretanijo, niso bili v zadostni meri uresničeni,
H. whereas the various lines of support provided for in the various fisheries agreements between the EU and Mauritania have been very inadequately implemented,
I. ker razen Nouadhibouja na severu države ni na več kot 700 kilometrov dolgem odseku atlantske obale nobenega drugega ribiškega pristanišča,
I. whereas, apart from the port of Nouadhibou, in the north of the country, there is not one fishing port in over 700 km of Atlantic coastline,
J. ker zaradi počasnega razvoja ribiškega sektorja v Mavretaniji država ni deležna dodane vrednosti, ki bi jo pridobila, če bi sama izkoriščala ribolovne vire (vključno s predelavo in prodajo rib),
J. whereas, owing to the scant development of the fisheries sector in Mauritania, the country is deprived of the value added that it would obtain if it were exploiting its fishery resources itself (including processing and sales),
K. ker bi razvoj ribiškega sektorja v Mavretaniji pripeljal do gospodarskega in družbenega razvoja, kar bi pomenilo odprtje delovnih mest in večjo samostojnost, suverenost in neodvisnost,
K. whereas securing the development of the fisheries sector would result in economic and social development for Mauritania, creating more jobs, autonomy, sovereignty and independence,
L. ker Evropska komisija še ni predložila naknadne ocene sporazuma na področju ribištva z Mavretanijo,
L. whereas the Commission has not yet submitted the ex-post evaluation of the fisheries agreement with Mauritania,
M. ker lahko odsotnost sredstev za nadzor in spremljanje na morju privede do prevelikega izkoriščanja ribolovnih virov in zmanjšanja biotske raznovrstnosti,
M. whereas the lack of means for carrying out monitoring and surveillance at sea makes it more likely that fishery resources will be overexploited and biodiversity will decline,
4. poziva k podpori EU pri čimprejšnji izgradnji ustreznih zmogljivosti za iztovarjanje rib na osrednjem in južnem delu mavretanske obale, tako da bo ribe, ujete v mavretanskih vodah, mogoče iztovoriti v nacionalnih pristaniščih, ne pa zunaj države, kot se sedaj redno dogaja;
Believes that the EU should support the fastest possible construction of adequate facilities for landing fish along Mauritania's central and southern coastline, so that the fish caught in Mauritanian waters can be landed at national ports rather than outside the country, as is currently often the case;
8. meni, da se morajo tuji lastniki, tudi tisti, ki prihajajo iz EU, pri izkoriščanju virov v tretjih državah omejiti na vire, ki jih tamkajšnje prebivalstvo ne uporablja;
Takes the view that the exploitation of a third country's resources by foreign shipowners, including those from the EU, should be restricted to resources that are not used by the country's own population;
13. poudarja pravico držav, da dajejo prednost razvoju lastnega ribiškega sektorja in trga z nadzorom uvoženega blaga, z uvedbo minimalnih meril kakovosti in tehničnih meril ter z bojem proti dampingu;
Stresses countries' right to give priority to the development of their fisheries sector and market, taxing imported goods, imposing minimum quality criteria and technical criteria and combating dumping;
o pregledu evropske sosedske politike – vzhodna dimenzija
on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension
PE459.744v01-00 B7‑0198/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pregledu evropske sosedske politike – vzhodna dimenzija
PE459.744v01-00 B7‑0198/2011 European Parliament resolution on the review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension
– ob upoštevanju sklepov s seje zunanjih ministrov vzhodnega partnerstva z dne 13. decembra 2010,
– having regard to the conclusions of the Eastern Partnership Foreign Ministers meeting of 13 December 2010,
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij z dne 19. januarja 2006 o evropski sosedski politiki UL C 287E, 19.1.2006, str.
– having regard to its previous resolutions of 19 January 2006 on the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) OJ C 287E, 19.1.2006, p.
, z dne 15. novembra 2007 o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike UL C 282E, 6.11.2008, str.
, 15 November 2007 on strengthening the ENP OJ C 282E, 6.11.2008, p.
, z dne 6. julija 2006 o Evropskem sosedskem in partnerskem instrumentu UL C 303E, 13.12.2006, str.
, 6 July 2006 on the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) OJ C 303E, 13.12.2006, p.
, z dne 5. junija 2008 o letnem poročilu Sveta Evropskemu parlamentu o glavnih vidikih in osnovnih odločitvah skupne zunanje in varnostne politike UL C 285E, 26.11.2009, str.
, 5 June 2008 on the annual report from the Council to the European Parliament on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP OJ C 285E, 26.11.2009, p.
, z dne 19. februarja 2009 o pregledu Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva UL C 76E, 25.3.2010, str.
, 19 February 2009 on the review of the ENPI OJ C 76E, 25.3.2010, p.
, z dne 17. januarja 2008 o pristopu k regionalni politiki za Črno morje UL C 41E, 19.2.2009, str.
, 17 January 2008 on a Black Sea Regional Policy Approach OJ C 41E, 19.2.2009, p.
in z dne 20. januarja 2011 o strategiji EU za Črno morje Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0025 .
and 20 January 2011 on an EU Strategy for the Black Sea Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0025 .
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 20. maja 2010 o nujnosti evropske strategije za južni Kavkaz Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0193 .
– having regard to its resolution of 20 May 2010 on the Need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0193 .
– ob upoštevanju razvoja evropske sosedske politike od leta 2004, zlasti poročil Komisije o napredku pri njenem izvajanju,
– having regard to the development of the ENP since 2004, and in particular to the Commission’s progress reports on its implementation,
– ob upoštevanju svojih preteklih resolucij o Armeniji, Azerbajdžanu, Belorusiji, Gruziji, Republiki Moldaviji in Ukrajini ter priporočil odborov za parlamentarno sodelovanje s temi državami, z izjemo Belorusije,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, the Republic of Moldova and Ukraine, as well as to the recommendations of the parliamentary cooperation committees for those countries, with the exception of Belarus,
– ob upoštevanju odstavka 41 zgornje resolucije z dne 15. novembra 2007, ki poziva k vzpostavitvi parlamentarne skupščine evropske sosedske politike za vzhod (EURONEST),
– having regard to paragraph 41 of the above resolution of 15 November 2007, which calls for the setting-up of an EU-Neighbourhood East Parliamentary Assembly (EURONEST),
– ob upoštevanju akcijskih načrtov, sprejetih z Armenijo, Azerbajdžanom, Gruzijo in Moldavijo ter pridružitvenega načrta, sprejetega z Ukrajino,
– having regard to the Action Plans adopted jointly with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Moldova, and to the Association Agenda with Ukraine,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za zunanjo politiko z dne 26. julija 2010 o evropski sosedski politiki,
– having regard to the Foreign Affairs Council conclusions of 26 July 2010 on the ENP,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave z vrhunskega srečanja o vzhodnem partnerstvu v Pragi z dne 7. maja 2009,
– having regard to the Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit of 7 May 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 12. maja 2010 z naslovom Pregled evropske sosedske politike KOM(2010)0207 .
– having regard to the Commission communication of 12 May 2010 entitled ‘Taking Stock of the European Neighbourhood Policy COM(2010)0207 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 3. decembra 2008 o vzhodnem partnerstvu KOM(2008)0823 .
– having regard to the Commission communication of 3 December 2008 on Eastern Partnership COM(2008)0823 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočil Komisije z dne 5. decembra 2007 z naslovom Močna evropska sosedska politika KOM(2007) 0774.
– having regard to the Commission communications of 5 December 2007 entitled ‘A Strong European Neighbourhood Policy’ COM(2007)0774 .
, z dne 4. decembra 2006 o krepitvi evropske sosedske politike KOM(2006) 0726.
, 4 December 2006 on strengthening the ENP COM(2006)0726 .
, z dne 12. maja 2004 z naslovom Evropska sosedska politika – strateški dokument KOM(2004) 0373.
, 12 May 2004 entitled ‘European Neighbourhood Policy - Strategy Paper’ COM(2004)0373 .
in z dne 1. marca 2003 z naslovom Širša Evropa – sosedstvo: nov okvir za odnose EU z njenimi vzhodnimi in južnimi sosedami KOM(2003)0104 .
and 1 March 2003 entitled ‘Wider Europe - Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours’ COM(2003)0104 .
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1638/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 2006 o splošnih določbah o ustanovitvi Evropskega instrumenta sosedstva in partnerstva UL L 310, 09.11.06, str.
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1638/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 laying down general provisions establishing a European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p.
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Računskega sodišča št. 13/2010 z naslovom Ali se je novi evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva na Južnem Kavkazu (Armenija, Azerbajdžan, Gruzija) začel uspešno izvajati in ali prinaša rezultate?,
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors Special Report No 13/2010, entitled ‘Is the new European Neighbourhood Policy Instrument successfully launched and achieving results in the South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia)?’,
A. ker je Lizbonska pogodba ustvarila potrebne razmere, v katerih lahko EU izboljša učinkovitost in enotnost svojih odnosov z vsemi akterji in državami partnericami, zlasti s svojimi sosedami,
A. whereas the Lisbon Treaty has created the conditions required for the EU to improve the effectiveness and coherence of its relations with all actors and partners, particularly its neighbours,
B. ker je v členu 8 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji določeno, da Unija razvija posebne odnose z državami v svojem sosedstvu, da ustvarja območje blaginje in dobrega sosedstva, ki temelji na vrednotah Unije in za katero so značilni tesni in miroljubni odnosi na podlagi sodelovanja,
B. whereas under Article 8 of the Treaty on European Union the Union must develop a special relationship with neighbouring countries, aiming to establish an area of prosperity and good neighbourliness, founded on the values of the Union and characterised by close and peaceful relations based on cooperation,
C. ker so se z evropsko sosedsko politiko od njene vzpostavitve leta 2004 okrepili odnosi z državami partnericami in je ta politika prinesla več vidnih koristnih rezultatov; ker izzivi ostajajo in ker se treba zdaj osredotočiti na izvajanje, pri tem pa jasno opredeliti prednostne naloge za ukrepanje, jasna merila in razlikovanje na osnovi uspešnosti,
C. whereas, since it was launched, the ENP has led to a strengthening of relations with partner countries and brought some tangible benefits; whereas challenges still remain and the focus should now be on implementation, with clearly defined priorities for action, clear benchmarking and performance-based differentiation,
D. ker je vzhodno partnerstvo pomemben politični okvir za poglabljanje odnosov z državami partnericami in med njimi, ki temelji na načelu skupnega lastništva in odgovornosti ter pozitivnega pogojevanja; ker poglobljeni odnosi zahtevajo večjo skupno predanost in viden napredek, povezan z dobrim upravljanjem in demokratičnimi standardi,
D. whereas the Eastern Partnership (EaP) is a meaningful political framework for deepening relations with and among partner countries, based on principles of shared ownership and responsibility, as well as conditionality; whereas strengthened relations require an enhanced joint commitment and tangible progress towards good governance and democratic standards,
E. ker se vzhodno partnerstvo osredotoča na štiri tematske platforme sodelovanja, in sicer: demokracijo, dobro upravljanje in stabilnost; gospodarsko sodelovanje in približevanje politikam EU; okolje, podnebne spremembe in energetska varnost; ter medsebojne stike,
E. whereas the EaP focuses on four thematic cooperation platforms, namely: democracy, good governance and stability; economic integration and convergence with EU policies; environment, climate change and energy security; and contacts between people,
F. ker je sodelovanje v okviru parlamentarne skupščine EURONEST, ki deluje kot platforma za izmenjavo mnenj, namenjeno doseganju pozitivnih učinkov, iskanju skupnih stališč glede svetovnih izzivov našega časa, povezanih z demokracijo, politiko, gospodarstvom, energetsko varnostjo in socialnimi zadevami, in krepitvi vezi med državami v regiji in EU ter med samimi državami vzhodnega partnerstva,
F. whereas cooperation within the framework of the EURONEST Parliamentary Assembly seeks to bring positive effects by serving as a platform for exchanging views, finding common positions on global challenges of our times with respect to democracy, politics, economics, energy security and social affairs, and strengthening ties between the countries of the region and the EU and among the EaP countries themselves,
G. ker bi EU morala spodbujati in znatno okrepiti pristop od spodaj navzgor z večjo ekonomsko podporo civilnim družbam ter spodbujanjem svobode tiska in svobode zbiranja,d a se ohranja proces demokratizacije, ki je temeljni pogoj za dolgoročno stabilizacijo,
G. whereas the EU should promote and significantly strengthen a bottom-up approach, increasing its economic support to civil societies and promoting freedom of the press and freedom of assembly in order to sustain the democratisation processes, which are a precondition for long-term stabilisation,
H. ker nerešeni regionalni konflikti v sosedstvu EU ogrožajo trajnostni gospodarski, družbeni in politični razvoj zadevnih držav in resno ovirajo regionalno sodelovanje, stabilnost in varnost, ker tudi resno ovirajo razvoj vsega potenciala in prednosti evropske sosedske politike; ker ti konflikti preprečujejo, da bi se kot razsežnost evropske sosedske politike razvili pravi in učinkoviti večstranski odnosi; ker se še vedno podcenjuje vloga, ki bi jo lahko v zadevnih državah imela civilna družba,
H. whereas unresolved regional conflicts in the EU’s neighbourhood undermine the sustainable economic, social and political development of the countries concerned and present a serious obstacle to regional cooperation, stability and security; whereas they are also a serious impediment to the development of the ENP’s full potential and priorities; whereas these conflicts are undermining the development of a genuine and effective multilateral dimension to the ENP; whereas the role that civil society could play in the countries concerned continues to be underestimated,
I. ker so se pri nedavnih demonstracijah proti represivnim režimom v Belorusiji, Tuniziji in Egiptu jasno pokazale legitimne želje ljudi po demokraciji,
I. whereas the recent demonstrations by people in Belarus, Tunisia and Egypt against repressive regimes clearly expressed their legitimate aspirations to democracy,
J. ker EU in države članici v svoji politiki podpore nedemokratičnih režimov v Tuniziji in Egiptu in sodelovanja z njima niso bile uspešne in bi morale to upoštevati v odnosih med EU in Belorusijo, in ker bi morala celotna evropska sosedska politika EU temeljiti na vrednotah,
J. whereas the EU’s and Member States’ policy of supporting and cooperating with undemocratic regimes in Tunisia and Egypt failed and should prove a lesson learned for EU relations with Belarus, and whereas the EU’s overall ENP policy should be value-based,
K. ker je Evropski instrument sosedstva in partnerstva pripomogel k poenostavitvi financiranja evropske sosedske politike; ker bi moral proces vzpostavitve njegovega naslednika odražati sklepe strateškega pregleda evropske sosedske politike in vključevati obširno posvetovanje,
K. whereas the ENPI has helped to simplify the financing of the ENP; whereas the process of designing its successor instrument should reflect the conclusions of the ENP strategic review and should involve wide-ranging consultations,
Pregle d evropske sosedske politike – S plošno
ENP r eview – General
2. pozdravlja tekoči pregled evropske sosedske politike in poudarja, da bi se morale s tem postopkom nadalje okrepiti vezi med EU in sosednjimi državami; poudarja tudi, da lahko te države, kljub temu da se njihove težnje in cilji razlikujejo, postanejo najtesnejše politične zaveznice EU;
Welcomes the ongoing review of the ENP and stresses that this process should lead to a further enhancement of the EU’s ties with neighbouring countries and that, while the aspirations and goals of those countries may differ, all of them have the potential to be the closest of political allies for the EU;
4. poudarja, da bi moral strateški pregled evropske sosedske politike odražati močnejšo politično zavezo vseh partneric in okrepiti razlikovanje na osnovi uspešnosti in jasno določenih meril;
Emphasises that the strategic review of the ENP should reflect an increased political commitment from all partners and should strengthen performance-based differentiation based on clearly defined benchmarks;
7. poziva Evropsko službo za zunanje delovanje in delegacije EU po vsem svetu, naj čim bolj prispevajo k zagotavljanju močnejšega vključevanja človekovih pravic in političnih načel v preučitev političnih razmer v tretjih državah in prenosa v politike „preoblikovanja“ prek projektov pomoči;
Calls on the EEAS and the EU delegations around the world to contribute greatly to ensuring that human rights and political principles are more strongly integrated into the analysis of the political situation in third countries and fed into possible ‘transformation’ policies via aid projects;