natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bi moral portal upoštevati tudi potrebe invalidov, ki bi morali dobiti popoln dostop do kolektivnega evropskega znanja; zato založnike spodbuja, naj zagotovijo več del v formatih, dostopnih invalidom; priporoča Komisiji, naj za čim več digitalnih vsebin zagotovi posebne digitalne različice za invalide, kot so avdio vsebine;
Points out that the portal should take into account the needs of disabled people, who should be able to get full access to Europe's collective knowledge; therefore encourages publishers to make more works available in formats accessible to disabled persons; recommends to the Commission that it ensure the provision of special digital versions for people with disabilities, such as audio reading, for as much of the digital content as possible;
poudarja, da je enak dostop do skupne evropske kulturne dediščine izjemno pomemben, zato poziva države članice, naj znotraj EU odstranijo ovire za dostop do nekaterih delov vsebine Europeane;
Stresses the importance of equal access to the common European cultural heritage and therefore asks the Member States to remove intra-EU barriers to access to some parts of Europeana content;
poudarja, da morata biti dostop do portala Europeana in ogled dokumentov brez prenosa brezplačna za posameznike in javne ustanove; poudarja, da bi moral imeti portal Europeana možnost zaračunavanja nalaganja in tiskanja vseh materialov, zaščitenih z avtorsko pravico, ti stroški pa bi morali biti sprejemljivi s socialnega vidika;
Stresses that access to the Europeana portal and viewing documents, without downloading must be free of charge for private individuals and public institutions; stresses that Europeana should have the possibility to charge for downloads and printouts of all materials under copyright, and that such charges should be socially acceptable;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe, da bi se izognili vrzeli v znanju med Evropo in državami zunaj EU ter Evropejcem zagotovili popoln dostop do lastne kulturne dediščine v vsej njeni raznolikosti in olajšali dostop do nje vsemu svetu;
Urges the Commission and Member States to take all necessary steps to avoid a knowledge gap between Europe and non-EU countries and to ensure full access for Europeans to their own cultural heritage in all its diversity, as well as facilitating access thereto for the whole world;
poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje delo, ki ga je začela skupina strokovnjakov na visoki ravni, saj s tem prispeva k skupni viziji evropskih digitalnih knjižnic in podpira praktične rešitve za ključna vprašanja pri spletni dostopnosti kulturnih dobrin;
Asks the Commission to continue the work started by the High Level Expert Group, as it contributes to a shared vision for European digital libraries, and supports practical solutions for key issues affecting online accessibility of cultural assets;
poudarja, da bi morala Europeana narediti vse potrebno, na spletu in drugače, za svojo promocijo pri evropskih državljanih, zlasti tistih, ki se ukvarjajo s kulturnimi dejavnostmi v zasebnem, javnem in izobraževalnem sektorju;
Stresses that Europeana should take all necessary steps online and offline to promote itself among citizens of Europe, in particular those involved in cultural activities in the private, public and educational sectors;
spodbuja tiste, ki zagotavljajo vsebine, da povečajo raznolikost vrst vsebin na Europeani, zlasti avdio in video vsebin, ter namenijo posebno pozornost tistim oblikam izražanja, ki pripadajo ustnemu izročilu, in delom, ki hitreje propadajo, ob hkratnem spoštovanju pravic intelektualne lastnine, zlasti pravic avtorjev in izvajalcev; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da je pomembno spoštovati moralne pravice, da se zaščiti neokrnjenost dela in se izogne morebitnim spremembam (cenzura, sprememba dela itd.);
Encourages content providers to increase the diversity of the types of content for Europeana, especially audio and video content, paying special attention to those forms of expression belonging to oral cultures and to those works which deteriorate easily, while respecting intellectual property rights, especially authors and performers‘ rights; stresses, in this regard, the importance of respecting moral rights in order to protect the integrity of the work, and avoid any possible changes (censorship, alterations to works, etc.);
meni, da sta svobodno in umetniško izražanje temeljni vrednoti; meni, da kulturne ustanove ali povezovalci ne smejo biti izpostavljeni pregledovanju ali cenzuriranju v zvezi z evropskimi kulturnimi, literarnimi ali znanstvenimi vsebinami, ki jih prispevajo Europeani;
Believes that free and artistic expression are fundamental values; considers that cultural institutions or aggregators shall not be the subject of scrutiny or censorship with regard to the European cultural, literary or scientific content provided to Europeana;
Javne vsebine in dostop do njih
Public domain content and access
je prepričan, da morajo prosto dostopne vsebine v analognem svetu ostati proste tudi v digitalnem okolju po spremembi formata;
Is convinced that public domain content in the analogue world should remain in the public domain in the digital environment even after the format shift;
poudarja, da mora biti glavni cilj evropske politike digitalizacije zaščita evropske kulturne dediščine in da je treba pri tem zagotoviti, da pravice do digitalizacije ne bodo izključne, saj bi v nasprotnem primeru lahko prišlo do pojava „novih pravic“, ki bi izhajale iz postopka digitalizacije, kot na primer obvezno plačilo za ponovno uporabo javno dostopnih del;
Recalls that the main objective of European digitisation policy must be the protection of Europe's cultural heritage, and that guarantees must be given in this regard to ensure that digitisation activities have a non-exclusive status, so that these activities do not lead to the appearance of ‘new rights’ derived from the digitisation process, such as, for example, an obligation to pay for the reuse of works in the public domain;
poudarja, da morajo pretekli sporazumi o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih z drugimi knjižnicami veljati tudi za Europeano in da morajo te knjižnice prejeti fizične kopije že digitaliziranega gradiva;
Recalls that Europeana must be able to benefit from agreements signed with other libraries under public-private partnerships and that said libraries must therefore be provided with a physical copy of the files already digitised;
poudarja, da morajo fizične kopije javno dostopnega gradiva, ki je bilo digitalizirano v okviru javno-zasebnih partnerstev, ostati v lasti partnerske javne ustanove, če pa to ni mogoče in če so morale kulturne ustanove iz držav članic, ki sodelujejo v javno-zasebnih partnerstvih, skleniti sporazume o digitalizaciji del iz svoje nacionalne dediščine, ki vsebujejo določbe o izključnih pravicah, je treba pred objavo na portalu Europeana zagotoviti, da bo gradivo po preteku teh določb postalo last omenjenih ustanov;
States that physical files of works in the public domain which have been digitised by public-private partnerships must remain the property of the public partner institution, and that, should this prove impossible and cultural institutions from Member States are led, under a public-private partnership, to conclude agreements with exclusivity clauses for the digitisation of works from their national heritage, then assurances must be obtained before accessing the Europeana portal that the digitised files will become the property of the institutions upon the expiry of said clauses;
poudarja, da se ne sme spremeniti prvotnega namena digitalne knjižnice ter prepustiti širjenja znanja prek interneta zasebnim in tržnim podjetjem, da digitalizacija del ne bi privedla do prisvojitve javne evropske dediščine in nove privatizacije javne domene;
Stresses that the digital library must not depart from its prime objective, namely to ensure that the dissemination of knowledge on the Internet is not left to private commercial firms, in order that the digitisation of works does not equate to a stranglehold on Europe's public heritage that results in the public domain being privatised;
priporoča Komisiji, naj ponudnike digitalnih vsebin spodbudi k certificiranju spletnih strani, ki so navedene v Europeani;
Recommends to the Commission that it asks digital content providers to certify websites referenced by Europeana;
poziva evropske kulturne ustanove, ki se ukvarjajo z digitalizacijo svojih prostih vsebin, naj omogočijo njihovo dostopnost prek Europeane in je ne omejujejo zgolj na ozemlje lastne države.
Calls on those European cultural institutions which take up the digitisation of their public domain works‘ content to make it available via Europeana and not to restrict availability to the territory of their country;
Vprašanja avtorskih pravic, vključno z deli, za katera imetniki pravic niso znani
Copyright issues, including orphan works
poudarja, da je treba najti takšno rešitev, da bi Europeana poleg avtorsko zaščitenih del po sektorskem pristopu ponujala zlasti razprodana dela in dela, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, ob hkratnem upoštevanju zakonov o intelektualni lastnini in ohranjanju legitimnih interesov imetnikov pravic; meni, da bi lahko spodbujali rešitve, kot so razširjeno kolektivno licenciranje ali druge prakse kolektivnega upravljanja;
Stresses that solutions should be found for Europeana also to offer in-copyright works, particularly out-of-print and orphan works, taking a sector-by-sector approach, while complying with laws governing intellectual property and preserving the legitimate interests of rightholders; believes that solutions such as extended collective licensing or other collective management practices could be favoured;
pozdravlja razpravo o avtorskem pravu EU, ki jo je začela Komisija z namenom, da bi uravnotežili pravice imetnikov avtorskih pravic in potrošnikov v globalno povezanem svetu glede na hitro spreminjanje spletne resničnosti z novimi tehnologijami ter družbenih in kulturnih praks;
Welcomes the Commission's launch of the debate on EU copyright law, which seeks to strike a balance between rightsholders and consumer rights in a globally connected world, in the context of the rapidly changing online reality of new technologies and social and cultural practices;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v okviru nadaljnjega razvoja pravnega varstva avtorskih pravic v Evropi sprejmejo kar najbolj enotne in celostne predpise, da bi preprečili nastanek avtorskih pravic sui generis zaradi same digitalizacije vsebin; meni, da je treba v okviru teh pogovorov odpreti tudi vprašanje, ali bi bilo treba uvesti pravne izjeme za dela, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, ki pa jih digitalizirajo javne ustanove;
Urges the Commission and the Member States, in the context of the further development of copyright protection in Europe, to adopt legal provisions which are as uniform and comprehensive as possible, designed to ensure that digitisation processes by themselves do not bring about any ‘sui generis’ copyright; takes the view that these discussions should also address the issue of whether legal derogations should be introduced for the digitisation of orphan works by public institutions;
poudarja pomen del, ki so zaščitena z avtorskimi pravicami, vendar pa imetniki teh pravic niso znani, ker jih kljub vztrajnemu iskanju ni mogoče izslediti, ter da je treba za vsak posamezni sektor natančno določiti število in zvrst tovrstnih del, da bi lahko našli ustrezne rešitve;
Stresses the importance of orphan works – works which are covered under copyright, but whose rights-holders cannot be determined despite a diligent search – and the need to ascertain precisely, on a sector-by-sector basis, the number and type of such works in order to find appropriate solutions;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj v skladu s svojim sporočilom o avtorskih pravicah v družbi znanja z dne 19. oktobra 2009 poda zakonodajni predlog o digitalizaciji, varstvu in širjenju del, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, s katerim bi ob upoštevanju zahteve za vztrajno iskanje imetnikov pravic in njihovemu plačilu odpravili sedanjo pravno negotovost;
Calls on the Commission, in regard to its Communication on Copyright in the Knowledge Economy of 19 October 2009, to submit a legislative proposal on the digitisation, preservation and dissemination of orphan works which would put an end to the current legal uncertainty, in accordance with the requirement for diligent search for, and remuneration of, rights-holders;
podpira namero Komisije o vzpostavitvi preprostih in stroškovno učinkovitih sistemov za podeljevanje in plačevanje pravic za digitalizacijo objavljenih del in njihovo dostopnost na internetu, v tesnem sodelovanju z vsemi, ki jih to zadeva;
Endorses the Commission's intention to establish a simple and cost-efficient rights clearance system for the digitisation of published works and their availability on the Internet, working in close cooperation with all the stakeholders involved;
zato pozdravlja in podpira pobude, kot je projekt ARROW Dosegljivi registri informacij o pravicah in delih, katerih imetnik avtorskih pravic ni znan.
Therefore, welcomes and supports initiatives, such as the ARROW project Accessible Registries of Rights Information and Orphan Works.
, v katerem sodelujejo imetniki pravic in predstavniki knjižnic, zlasti zato, ker si prizadevajo opredeliti imetnike in njihove pravice ter razjasniti status pravic, ne glede na to, ali gre za dela, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, ali razprodana dela;
, partnered by both rights-holders and library representatives, in particular since these seek to identify rights-holders and their rights, and to clarify the rights‘ status of works including whether these are orphan or out of print;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj vzpostavi evropsko bazo podatkov o delih, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani ali jih kljub dokumentiranemu in resnemu iskanju ni mogoče najti, ki bo omogočala izmenjavo informacij o lastništvu teh pravic in zmanjšala stroške pri podrobnem iskanju imetnikov;
Calls on the Commission to develop a European database of orphan works understood to be protected works whose rightholders are unknown or cannot be located, despite documented serious searches being made which would make it possible to exchange information on the ownership of rights and thereby reduce costs incurred in making diligent searches for rights-holders;
podpira uravnoteženo vseevropsko rešitev za digitalizacijo in širjenje del, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, sprva z njihovo opredelitvijo, oblikovanjem skupnih standardov (vključno s potrebno skrbnostjo pri iskanju njihovih avtorjev) in reševanjem vprašanja morebitnih kršitev avtorskih pravic pri uporabi takih del;
Favours a balanced Europe-wide solution for digitising and disseminating orphan works, starting by clearly defining them, establishing common standards (including that of due diligence applied in searching for their owners), and resolving the issue of potential copyright infringement when orphan works are used;
poudarja, da je treba najti rešitev za dokumente zasebne narave (pisma, beležke, fotografije, filmi), ki jih hranijo kulturne institucije, vendar niso bili nikoli objavljeni ali dostopni javnosti in se pri njih pojavljajo težave zaradi varovanja zasebnosti in moralnih pravic;
Emphasises that a solution must be found for personal documents (correspondence, notes, photos, films) which are held by cultural institutions, but have never been published or made available to the public, and which raise privacy-protection and moral-rights issues;
poudarja, da je treba razviti tehnologije za zagotovitev dolgoročne in trajne digitalne hrambe, interoperabilnosti sistemov dostopa do vsebin, večjezične navigacije in dostopnosti vsebine ter sklopa standardov za poenotenje; pozdravlja nadaljnjo uporabo odprtokodne programske opreme pri pripravi gradiv za Europeano;
Points out the need to develop technologies to ensure long-term and sustainable digital preservation, interoperability of access systems to content, multilingual navigation and availability of content and a set of unifying standards; welcomes the continued use of open source software in building the Europeana collection;
priporoča Komisiji, da se varnostne kopije digitaliziranega gradiva, ki ga dajo na razpolago nacionalne ustanove ali zasebni partnerji, shranjujejo na strojni opremi, ki je v lasti teh ustanov ali partnerjev;
Recommends to the Commission that backups of digitised material provided by national institutions or private partners be kept on hardware belonging to those institutions or partners;
priporoča, naj Komisija in partnerske ustanove v zasebnem sektorju poiščejo informacijske rešitve, kot so formati samo za branje in taki, ki so zaščiteni pred kopiranjem, za digitalizirano gradivo na spletišču Europeane, za katerega veljajo avtorske pravice, in da bo na strani, kjer se datoteka pojavi, povezava na spletišče ponudnika vsebine, kjer bo mogoče naložiti dokument z interneta pod pogoji, ki jih bo določil ponudnik;
Recommends that the Commission and partner institutions in the private sector find IT solutions – such as read-only and copy protect formats – for digitised material available on the Europeana website that is subject to copyright, and that the file's presentation page include a link to a page on the content provider's website where the document can be downloaded under the conditions stipulated by the provider;
priporoča Komisiji, naj vztraja pri standardnem elektronskem formatu digitaliziranih del, da zagotovi združljivost digitaliziranih dokumentov s spletnim vmesnikom in podatkovno bazo;
Recommends to the Commission that it insist on a standard electronic format for the digitised works, so as to ensure that the digitised documents are compatible with the online interface and the database;
poziva skupino strokovnjakov na visoki ravni, naj preuči možnost uporabe aplikacij Web 2.0 v ločenem spletnem prostoru;
Asks the High Level Expert Group to examine the possibility of using Web 2.0 applications in a separate online space;
poudarja, da je vzpostavitev trajnostnega modela financiranja in upravljanja ključna za dolgoročni obstoj Europeane ter da je vloga neposrednih udeležencev pri postopku oblikovanja tovrstnega modela upravljanja bistvena;
Emphasises that creating a sustainable financing and governance model is crucial to Europeana's long-term existence and that the role of the immediate stakeholders in the process of establishing such a governance model is crucial;
Pokroviteljstvo in javno-zasebna partnerstva
Sponsorship and public - private partnerships
poudarja, da moramo, če želimo biti uspešni pri kritju visokih stroškov digitalizacije in premagovanju časovne stiske, razviti nove metode financiranja, kot so javno-zasebna partnerstva, če ta upoštevajo pravila intelektualne lastnine in konkurence ter hkrati lajšajo dostop do del prek kulturnih ustanov, s čimer knjižnicam zagotovijo prosto in časovno neomejeno uporabo digitaliziranega gradiva;
Stresses that, in order to meet the high costs of digitisation and time pressures, new methods of financing must be developed, such as public-private partnerships, provided that the latter comply with rules on intellectual property and competition while furthering access to works via cultural institutions, ensuring digitised files will be freely available to libraries with no time limits;
poudarja pomen enotnega pristopa na evropski ravni k pogojem za partnerstvo med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem; meni, da je treba natančno preučiti partnerske sporazume z zasebniki o načrtih za digitalizacijo, zlasti glede trajanja klavzul o izključnih pravicah, indeksiranja in poizvedovanja po referencah prek iskalnikov knjižnic z digitalnimi kartotekami za lastno uporabo, stalnega dostopa do ponujene storitve, nezaupnosti takih sporazumov in kakovosti digitalizacije;
Stresses the importance of a concerted approach at European level to the issue of the terms and conditions governing public-private partnerships and the need for an in-depth examination of partnership agreements with private stakeholders on digitisation plans, notably as regards the duration of exclusivity clauses, the indexing and referencing via search engine by libraries of digitised files held for their own use, service continuity, the non-confidential nature of such agreements and digitisation quality;
poudarja, da je digitalizacija del iz nacionalnih knjižnic plod finančnih naložb davkoplačevalcev in njihovih davčnih prispevkov; zato poudarja, da morajo sporazumi o javno-zasebnih partnerstvih vključevati določbo, da mora biti kopija dela, ki ga za knjižnico digitalizira zasebni partner, na voljo na vseh iskalnikih, s čimer se omogoči pregled tega gradiva tudi na spletni strani knjižnice in ne samo na strani partnerskega zasebnega podjetja;
Points out that the digitisation of works in national libraries is the fruit of the financial investment of taxpayers via payment of their taxes; stresses, therefore, that public-private partnership contracts must stipulate that the copy of the work digitised by the private half of the partnership on behalf of the library may be indexed by all search engines, so that it may be consulted on the library's website and not solely on the website of the partner private company;
poudarja, da vključevanje zasebnih partnerjev v postopek digitalizacije ne sme pripeljati do nastanka zasebnih monopolov, ki bi ogrozili kulturno raznolikost in pluralizem, in da je spoštovanje konkurenčnih pravil osnovni pogoj za vključitev zasebnih podjetij;
Recalls that the involvement of private partners in the digitisation process must not lead to the creation of private monopolies, which would threaten cultural diversity and pluralism, and that compliance with the rules of competition is a prerequisite to the involvement of private companies;
poudarja, da je mecenstvo zanimiva možnost za Europeano, če omogoča hkratno financiranje digitalizacije in kritje stroškov avtorskih pravic pri delih, ki se ne tiskajo več, delih, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, in zaščitenih delih, ter tudi kritje stroškov objavljanja teh vsebin na spletu;
Stresses that sponsorship is an interesting alternative for Europeana insofar as it offers an opportunity to fund not just digitisation activities but also the management of copyright payments for out-of-print, orphan and copyrighted works, as well as putting them online;
EU in javna finančna podpora
EU and public financial support
poudarja, da bi bilo treba znaten delež financiranja zagotoviti iz javnih sredstev, kot so prispevki EU, držav članic in kulturnih organizacij ter predlaga, naj se proces digitalizacije v okviru Europeane upošteva kot del lizbonske strategije ter naj se za ta proces nameni ločena proračunska postavka v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru;
Stresses that a substantial part of the financing should come from public contributions, such as contributions from the EU, Member States and cultural organisations and proposes that Europeana's digitisation process be interpreted as part of the Lisbon strategy and that a separate budget line be established in the next Multiannual Financial Framework;
poudarja, da bo zgolj z ločeno proračunsko postavko mogoče doseči pregledno, stroškovno učinkovito in namensko ustrezno porabo razpoložljivih finančnih sredstev;
Stresses that only a separate budget line can create the conditions to ensure that the funding available is spent transparently, cost-efficiently and in accordance with the objectives set;
ugotavlja, da je bilo doslej v okviru programa eContentplus predvidenih zgolj 6,2 milijona EUR za Europeano za obdobje 2009–2011;
Notes that only € 6.2 million has been earmarked to date for Europeana for 2009 to 2011 under the eContentplus programme;
zahteva, naj bo v naslednjem večletnem finančnem okviru za Europeano predviden večkratnik dosedanjih sredstev;
Calls for the next Multiannual Financial Framework to provide for several times more funding than that available to Europeana hitherto;