natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vztraja, da je orientacijski večletni okvir (MIF), ki ga bo za tri instrumente zunanjih odnosov (DCECI, ENI, SI) Komisija predložila v soodločanje, takoj ko bo sprejet finančni načrt za 2007–2013, bistveni del teh instrumentov in bi ga morala Parlament in Svet sprejeti v skladu s členom 251 (soodločanje), ter opozarja na stališče, ki ga podpira Odbor za zunanje zadeve, da Parlament ne more sprejeti zadevnih predpisov brez poprejšnjega poznavanja orientacijskega večletnega okvira;
Insists that the Multiannual Indicative Framework (MIF), which the Commission will introduce for the three external relations instruments (DCECI, ENI, SI) under co-decision as soon as the financial perspective 2007-2013 has been adopted, represents an essential part of the instruments and should be adopted by Parliament and the Council under Article 251 (codecision), and draws attention to the position endorsed by the Foreign Affairs Committee that, without prior knowledge of the Multiannual Indicative Framework, Parliament cannot adopt the respective regulations;
glede Bolgarije in Romunije ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da je v luči poročila o napredku, ki bo predvidoma objavljeno spomladi, popolnoma udeležen v postopkih nadzora ter da se stališče Parlamenta upošteva ob pripravi priporočila Komisije Svetu glede časovnega okvira pristopa obeh držav;
Reiterates its request, as concerns Bulgaria and Romania, that it be fully associated in the monitoring process with a view to the progress report due to be released in Spring, and for Parliament's position to be taken into account issuing the Commission’s recommendation to the Council on the timing of accession of both countries;
meni, da je treba storiti, kar je mogoče, da se zaključijo pogajanja o preostalih akcijskih načrtih; pričakuje pozorno spremljanje in ovrednotenje meril ter poziva, da se v tem pogledu dejavno vključi tudi Parlament;
Takes the view that all efforts should be made to conclude negotiations on the remaining Action Plans; expects close monitoring and assessment of the benchmarks and calls, in this respect, for the close involvement of Parliament;
poziva k oblikovanju pododborov za človekove pravice v kontekstu pridružitvenih sporazumov ter sporazumov o partnerstvu in sodelovanju z državami ESP, da bi se tako razvijal strukturiran dialog o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji;
Calls for the creation of human rights subcommittees in the context of the association and partnership and cooperation agreements with ENP countries, with a view to developing a structured dialogue on human rights and democracy;
poziva Komisijo, da skupaj s takšnimi pododbori pripravi letno poročilo o spoštovanju klavzule o človekovih pravicah in demokraciji iz sporazumov, to pa naj spremljajo podrobna ocena in priporočila o učinkovitosti in usklajenosti uveljavljenih ukrepov;
Calls on the Commission, together with such subcommittees, to draw up an annual report on compliance with the human rights and democracy clause of the agreements, accompanied by a detailed evaluation and recommendations dealing with the effectiveness and coherence of the action taken;
pričakuje jasnejšo opredelitev koncepta strateškega partnerstva, zlasti v povezavi s partnerstvi z Rusijo in Kitajsko; meni, da bi moral biti povezan z oprijemljivim napredkom na področju demokracije in človekovih pravic;
Expects a clearer definition of the concept of strategic partnership with regard, in particular, to those with Russia and China; takes the view that it ought to be linked to concrete progress in the field of democracy and human rights;
poziva k učinkovitejši in boljši opredelitvi vloge Komisije in Unije na splošno v jugovzhodni Evropi, pri čemer poudarja, da ima Unija zaradi postopnega zmanjševanja mednarodne navzočnosti v Bosni in Hercegovini ter števila pripadnikov UNMIK-a na Kosovu večjo odgovornost za do držav te regije, za katere mora evropska perspektiva postati oprijemljiva;
Urges a more effective and better definition of the role of the Commission and the Union in general in South East Europe, pointing out that the phasing-out of the international presence in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the gradual downsizing of UNMIK in Kosovo imply more responsibilities for the Union vis-à-vis the countries of this region whose European perspective needs to be made concrete;
verjame, da pogajanja o gospodarskem partnerstvu ne bi smela temeljiti na vzajemni sprostitvi trgovine z državami AKP, ki imajo znatno šibkejša gospodarstva, temveč bi morala v ospredje postaviti njihovo pravico do razvoja, priznati njihovo pravico do zaščite svojih lokalnih in regionalnih trgov ter slednje odpreti za izdelke in storitve iz industrijskih držav samo na območjih, kjer je gospodarstvo dovolj močno, da je lahko konkurenčno;
Believes that the Economic Partnership negotiations should not be based on trade liberalisation reciprocity with ACP countries, whose economies are considerably weaker, but on the contrary should assert their rights to development and acknowledge their right to protect their local and regional markets and only to open these up to products and services from industrialised countries in areas in which their economies are sufficiently strong to compete;
pozdravlja trud v podporo sposobnostim držav v razvoju, da dejavno sodelujejo pri trgovinskih pogajanjih in izvajanju trgovinskih pravil, dokler programi upoštevajo dejstvo, da morajo trgovinske strategije izhajati iz nacionalnih razvojnih strategij; opozarja, da 33. odstavek agende iz Dohe izrecno priznava pomen tehnične pomoči in krepitve zmogljivosti za države v razvoju na področjih trgovine in okolja; poudarja, da so programi „pomoči za trgovino“ dopolnilo pravičnejšim trgovinskim pravilom. in ne njihovo nadomestilo; zato zahteva, da programi „pomoči za trgovino“ ne bi bili vezani na trgovinska pogajanja ter da bi bili nenehno del tuje pomoči in tako postali bolj predvidljivo, dolgoročno sredstvo podpore razvoju;
Welcomes efforts to support the ability of developing countries to actively participate in trade negotiations and the implementation of trade rules, as long as programmes respect the fact that trade strategies must stem from national development strategies; recalls that paragraph 33 of the Doha Agenda explicitly recognises the importance of technical assistance and capacity building in the field of trade and the environment to developing countries; stresses that 'aid for trade' programmes are a complement to and not a substitute for fairer trade rules; demands therefore that 'aid for trade' programmes be uncoupled from trade negotiations, and that such programmes form an ongoing part of foreign assistance in order to make them a more predictable, long-term means of support for development;
poudarja, da bi morala Komisija v letu 2006 na področju javnih naročil za obrambo slediti željam Parlamenta in predložiti zakonodajni predlog, s katerim se na ravni Skupnosti ureja javno naročanje tako imenovanih nebistvenih obrambnih postavk in trgovanje z njimi, ne pa da zgolj objavi sporočilo s pojasnili o obsegu in uporabi člena 296; poudarja, da bi morala Komisija storiti vse, kar je v njeni pristojnosti, da preseže škodljive učinke člena 296 in s ciljem ukinitve tega člena;
Stresses that in the field of defence procurement the Commission in 2006 should follow the wishes of Parliament, not only publish an interpretative communication on the scope and application of Article 296, but also come forward with a legislative proposal to regulate the trade and procurement of so-called ‘non-essential’ defence items at Community level; points out that the Commission should do everything within its power to overcome the harmful effects of Article 296 with a view to abolishing this article;
poudarja tudi, da si mora Komisija po svojih najboljših močeh prizadevati za čim večjo učinkovitost pri uveljavljanju pravil Evropske unije o ravnanju pri izvozu orožja v njihovi novi obliki pravno zavezujočega skupnega stališča in naj nujno sprejme ukrepe, s katerimi se pravila nadomestijo s predpisi in se tako zagotovi, da ne bo več prihajalo do neodgovornega izvažanja orožja; spodbuja Komisijo, naj pripravi predloge za znatno izboljšanje režima Skupnosti za nadzor izvoza blaga in tehnologije z dvojno rabo; poudarja, da bi prihodnja pravna ureditev morala zajemati konvencionalne tehnologije in pa tehnologije, ki jih je mogoče uporabiti za vse vrste orožja za množično uničevanje;
Stresses also that the Commission should make every effort to ensure the highest possible efficiency in the application of the Code of Conduct on Arms Exports in its new format of a legally binding Common Position, and to take measures, as a matter of urgency, to supplement the code by establishing regulations to ensure that no irresponsible arms exports can take place any longer; encourages the Commission to come forward with proposals to substantially improve the Community regime for the control of exports of dual-use items and technology; stresses that future regulation should include both conventional technologies and technologies which can be used for all types of weapons of mass destruction;
pozdravlja napoved Komisije glede sporočila o „konvencionalni razorožitvi kot prispevku za človeško varnost“; vendar poudarja, da to sporočilo ne sme zajemati zgolj protipehotnih min, temveč vse vrste min, vključno s protioklepnimi minami, kot tudi vse vrste neeksplodiranih ubojnih sredstev, drobljiva streliva, orožja na osnovi (osiromašenega) urana in granate z belim fosforjem; Komisijo nujno poziva, naj da prednost študijam o okoljskem vplivu sodobnih vojaških tehnologij (kot so sistemi nizkofrekvenčnih podvodnih sonarjev) in o tem, kako preprečiti razvoj in rabo tovrstnih tehnologij;
Welcomes the announcement by the Commission of a communication on 'conventional disarmament as a contribution to human security'; points out, however, that this communication should not only cover anti-personnel landmines, but all types of mines, including anti-vehicle mines, as well as all varieties of unexploded ordnance, fragmentation munitions, (depleted) uranium weapons and white phosphorous shells; urges the commission to give priority to studies on the environmental impact of modern military technologies (such as underwater low-frequency sonar systems) and how to prevent further development and use of such technologies;
s tem v zvezi poudarja, da bi morala Komisija pripraviti sporočilo o novi strategiji EU o orožju malega kalibra in lahkem strelnem orožju ter predloge o tem, kako izboljšati učinkovitost njenih programov razorožitve, demobilizacije in ponovnega vključevanja;
Emphasises in this respect that the commission should come forward with a communication on the new EU strategy on small arms and light weapons (SALW) and with proposals on how to improve the efficiency of its programmes on Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR);
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Komisiji, Svetu ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.
ki ga vlaga Francis Wurtz
by Francis Wurtz
zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2006
on the Commission legislative and work programme 2006
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta zakonodajnem in delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2006
European Parliament resolution on the Commission legislative and work programme 2006
ob upoštevanju zakonodajnega in delovnega programa Komisije za leto 2006,
having regard to the Commission legislative and work programme 2006,
ker je program Komisije zelo pristranski do deregulacijske politike in ne vsebuje predlogov za socialno politiko,
whereas the Commission’s programme has a strong bias towards deregulation policies and a total lack of social policy proposals,
ker je bila lizbonska strategija glavni instrument, s katerim se v EU spodbujata liberalizacija javnih podjetij in zmanjševanje pravic delavcev,
whereas the Lisbon Strategy has been the main instrument within the EU to promote the liberalisation of public utilities and the deterioration of workers’ rights,
ker v delovnem programu Komisija predlaga samo štiri nezakonodajne dejavnosti za vprašanja socialne politike in niti ene zakonodajne pobude,
whereas the Commission proposes only four non-legislative actions on social policy issues in its work programme, and not a single legislative initiative,
ker je „načrt D“ Komisije predvsem poskus, da bi obnovila postopek sprejetja Ustave in ne odraža pričakovanj državljanov,
whereas the Commission’s ‘Plan D’ is mostly an attempt to restart the process of approval of the Constitution and does not reflect the expectations of the citizens,
ob upoštevanju učinkov pakta stabilnosti, zaradi katerih so socialni problemi vse večji, zlasti stanje zaposlenosti, socialne izključenosti in neenakosti v razvoju,
having regard to the effects of the stability pact, which make social problems worse, in particular the situation with regard to employment, social exclusion and inequalities in development,
ob upoštevanju predlogov britanskega predsedstva za finančno perspektivo 2007-2013, ki še poslabšujejo prvotne predloge Komisije, že tako pomanjkljive glede na socialne, gospodarske in okoljske izzive razširjene Evrope,
having regard to the UK Presidency’s proposals on the 2007-2013 financial perspective, which worsen still further the Commission’s initial proposals, that were already seriously lacking in the face of the social, economic and environmental challenges in an enlarged Europe,
meni, da so nacionalni programi reform v okviru revidirane lizbonske strategije instrument, s katerim se bodo spodbujale in upravičevale take reforme trga dela in socialne varnosti v državah članicah, ki bodo imele škodljive gospodarske in socialne posledice;
Considers the national reform programmes in the framework of the revised Lisbon Strategy to be an instrument to push forward and justify the same labour market and social security reforms in the Member States that will have damaging economic and social consequences;
poziva k pravilni oceni socialnih, okoljskih in gospodarskih učinkov liberalizacijskih direktiv; zavzema kritično stališče do namere Komisije, da bo predložila dodatne projekte liberalizacije (npr. popoln notranji trg poštnih storitev, prost pretok blaga na področju, ki še ni usklajeno, finančne storitve);
Calls for a proper evaluation of the social, environmental and economic effects of the liberalisation directives; takes a critical view of the Commission’s intention to put forward further liberalisation projects (e.g. a full internal market for postal services, free movement of goods in the non-harmonised area, financial services);
močno obžaluje, da Komisija predloga direktive o storitvah na notranjem trgu ali predloga direktive o pristaniških storitvah ni uvrstila na nedavni seznam predlogov, ki jih namerava umakniti; poziva Komisijo, naj izjemno sporna in zapletena osnutka direktiv umakne ter tako prispeva k resnično„boljši zakonski ureditvi“;
Deeply regrets that the Commission did not include the proposal for a directive on services in the internal market or the proposal for a directive on port services in its recent list of pending proposals to be withdrawn; urges the Commission to withdraw these highly contradictory and complex drafts as a contribution to true ‘better regulation’;
je zaskrbljen zaradi načina, kako želi Komisija izvajati nadzor državne pomoči; vztraja, da politika Komisije na tem področju ne sme ogrožati nalog, povezanih s splošnim interesom in s splošnim gospodarskim interesom držav članic;
Is concerned about the way in which the Commission wants to go ahead with the surveillance on state aid; insists that the Commission’s policy in this area must not jeopardise duties relating to the general interest and the general economic interest in the Member States;
poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga preprečiti davčno tekmovanje med državami članicami; svari, da bo ta proces spodkopal davčne osnove v vseh državah članicah, za posledico pa bo imel nezadostne državne investicije;
Calls on the Commission to help avoid a tax race between Member States; warns that this process will undermine the tax bases of all Member States with the consequence of insufficient state investments;
opominja Komisijo, da so močna MSP nujna za ustvarjanje delovnih mest ter morajo biti obvezno vključena v napredek na področju raziskav in tehnologije; je zaskrbljen nad dejstvom, da se Komisija osredotoča na velike družbe; odločno zavrača stališče Komisije, da je treba posebno pozornost nameniti obrambni industriji;
Reminds the Commission that strong SMEs are vital for job creation and that they are also inalienable for research and technological progress; is concerned that the Commission is focusing on big companies; strongly rejects the Commission’s view that particular attention should be paid to the defence industry;
izraža odločno nasprotovanje do oblikovanja evropskega trga za obrambne proizvode in do napovedanega predloga o javnih naročilih na področju obrambe; poudarja, da namesto tega Evropa potrebuje odločno politiko razoroževanja in preobrazbo orožne industrije;
States its fierce opposition to the creation of a European market for defence products and the announced proposal on defence procurement; points out that Europe instead needs a strong policy for disarmament and a conversion of the armaments industry;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija obravnavala predloge za zakonodajne ukrepe, ki jih je podal Parlament v svoji resoluciji o socialni agendi za obdobje 2006-2010 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0210. ;
Expects the Commission to take up the proposals for legislative action made by Parliament in its resolution on the Social Agenda for the period 2006-2010 Texts Adopted , P6_TA(2005)0210. ;
izraža zaskrbljenost nad namero Komisije, da pripravi zeleno knjigo o razvoju delovnega prava za njegovo„poenostavitev in modernizacijo“; meni, da bi se morala zelena knjiga raje osredotočiti na boljšo zaščito pravic delavcev in urediti pogodbe o zaposlitvi, ki niso poenotene (npr. projektno, občasno, začasno delo, delo za določen čas);
Expresses its concern about the Commission’s intention to draft a Green Paper on the evolution of labour law aiming at its ‘simplification and modernisation’; considers it more appropriate that the Green Paper should focus on how better to protect the rights of workers and to remedy the destandardisation of employment contracts (e.g. project, contingent, precarious, fixed-term employment);
izraža zaskrbljenost glede predvidene „racionalizacije, poenostavitve in uskladitve“ odprte metode usklajevanja socialnega vključevanja, pokojnin in zdravstvenega varstva, saj to lahko še zmanjša pomen boja za izkoreninjenje revščine in socialne izključenosti ter odvrne od usmeritve k „dolgoročni finančni stabilnosti“ (kar pomeni spodbudo za znižanja in privatizacijo tveganj) v pokojninskih shemah socialne varnosti in pri zdravstvenem varstvu, kar je v nasprotju z načelom splošnega dostopa in kakovosti,
Is concerned about the intended ‘rationalisation, simplification and synchronisation’ of the open methods of coordination on social inclusion, pensions and healthcare, as this could imply an even weaker role for the fight to eradicate poverty and social exclusion and a strengthened bias towards ‘financial sustainability’ (meaning promotion of cuts and privatising risks) in social security pension schemes and healthcare as opposed to universal accessibility and quality;
poziva Komisijo, da umakne predlog o reviziji direktive o delovnem času; pričakuje od Komisije, da bo pripravila nov predlog, ki bo polno upošteval sodbo Evropskega sodišča o dežurni službi kot delovnem času, odpravil možnosti zavrnitve, zmanjšal število odstopanj in se osredotočil na uskladitev delovnega in zasebnega življenja ter zniževanje najvišjega tedenskega števila delovnih ur;
Calls on the Commission to withdraw its proposal on the revision of the Working Time Directive; expects the Commission to draft a new proposal which fully respects the European Court of Justice’s ruling on on-call time as working time, abolishes the opt-outs, diminishes the number of derogations and focuses on reconciling employment and private life and on lowering the maximum weekly working hours;
poziva Komisijo, naj ob določanju strateških smernic v kmetijski politiki podpira načelo suverenosti in varnosti hrane v državah članicah; zavzema stališče, da je reforma v sektorjih vina, sadja in zelenjave, banan in sladkorja, nesprejemljiva, saj temelji izključno na proračunskih prihrankih in na perspektivi pogajanj STO;
Calls on the Commission, when establishing its strategic guidelines on agriculture policy, to uphold the principle of food sovereignty and security in the Member States; takes the view that the reform of the wine, fruit and vegetable, banana and sugar sectors is unacceptable as it is based exclusively on budgetary savings and the perspective of the WTO negotiations;
ugotavlja, da bo leta 2006 Komisija opravila oceno gospodarskih razmer v ribiškem sektorju in izvajanja skupne ribiške politike od njene reforme leta 2002; izraža globoko zaskrbljenost nad gospodarsko krizo v ribiškem sektorju in poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi oceno iz leta 2006, da bo predlagala konkretne ukrepe za podporo in spodbujanje obalnega ribištva in obalnih regij z omejenimi možnostmi, ki so odvisne od tega sektorja; ponavlja svoj poziv Komisiji, naj čim prej predstavi ukrepe, s katerimi bo nadomestila vedno višje operativne stroške za ladjevje, ki so posledica dvigovanja cen nafte; obžaluje, da se niso sprejeli nikakršni ukrepi, s katerimi bi ublažili gospodarske in socialne učinke, ki jih je imela zamrznitev dejavnosti ladjevja v okviru obnovitvenih načrtov;
Notes that in 2006 the Commission will carry out an evaluation of the economic situation of the fisheries sector and the implementation of the common fisheries policy since its 2002 reform; is deeply concerned about the economic crisis in the fisheries sector and asks the Commission to use this 2006 evaluation to propose concrete measures to support and boost inshore fisheries and less-favoured coastal regions dependent on this sector; reiterates its call for the Commission to present as soon as possible measures to compensate for the rising operational costs of fleets as a result of the increase in oil prices; regrets that no measures have been proposed to compensate for the economic and social impacts of the freezing of fleet activity in the context of recovery plans;
opozarja na namero Komisije, po zahtevi spomladanskega Evropskega sveta, da bo predstavila predlog za novo, bolj celovito in ambiciozno strategijo trajnostnega razvoja;
Recalls the Commission’s intention, following the request from the Spring European Council, to present a proposal for a new, more comprehensive and ambitious sustainable development strategy;
meni, da je za strategijo trajnostnega razvoja bistven boljši izkoristek sinergije med dopolnilnimi ukrepi in politikami in poudarja, da se morajo ustrezno obravnavati tudi podnebne spremembe in zaviranje izgube biotske raznovrstnosti; zavzema stališče, da mora strategija zajemati dolgoročne usmeritve, jasne cilje in učinkovite nadzorne mehanizme;
Considers it essential that the sustainable development strategy make better use of the synergies between complementary actions and policies, and stresses that climate change and halting biodiversity loss must also be adequately addressed; takes the view that the strategy must contain long-term orientations, clear objectives, targets and effective monitoring mechanisms;
poudarja, kako pomembna sta vprašanje podnebnih sprememb in zadostitev obvezam iz Kjotskega protokola; poudarja, da je za obdobje po 2012 transportnemu sektorju treba predpisati obveze za občutno zmanjšanje emisij CO2;
Reaffirms the significance of the climate change issue and the importance of meeting the obligation of the Kyoto protocol; emphasises that, for the period after 2012, obligations must be imposed on the transport sector in order to reduce its CO2 emissions drastically;