natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je na podlagi teh členov Komisija zahtevala uporabo sredstev ESPG za kritje svojih upravnih potreb v zvezi s pripravljalnimi dejavnostmi za vmesno oceno delovanja ESPG, kar vključuje študije o izvajanju, ponovno vključevanje delavcev na trg dela, razvoj omrežij med službami držav članic, pristojnimi za ESPG, in izmenjavo dobre prakse, prav tako za posodobitev in razvoj spletne strani, vlog in dokumentov v vseh jezikih ter avdiovizualnih dejavnosti, kar je v skladu z željo Parlamenta po večji ozaveščenosti državljanov o dejavnostih EU,
whereas on the basis of these Articles the Commission requested mobilisation of the EGF in order to cover its administrative needs for the preparatory work in view of the mid-term evaluation of the functioning of the EGF, covering studies on implementation, reintegration of workers into the labour market, development of networks between Member State services in charge of the EGF, exchange of good practices and also for the update and development of the website, of applications and documents in all languages and audiovisual activities, which is in line with Parliament's will to raise citizens’ awareness with regard to EU actions,
opozarja institucije, da so zavezane k zagotavljanju tekočega in hitrega postopka glede sprejemanja sklepov o uporabi sredstev ESPG;
Recalls the institutions’ commitment to ensure a smooth and rapid procedure for the adoption of the decisions on the mobilisation of the EGF;
ter zlasti člena 8(2) te uredbe,
, and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,
Evropski sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) je bil ustanovljen za zagotavljanje dodatne podpore presežnim delavcem, ki so jih prizadele posledice velikih strukturnih sprememb v svetovnih trgovinskih tokovih, ter za pomoč pri njihovi ponovni vključitvi na trg dela,
The European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support to redundant workers who suffer from the consequences of major structural changes in world trade patterns and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour market.
Za vloge, predložene po 1. maju 2009, je bilo področje uporabe ESPG razširjeno na podporo delavcem, ki so postali presežni neposredno zaradi svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize,
The scope of the EGF was broadened for applications submitted from 1 May 2009 to include support for workers made redundant as a direct result of the global financial and economic crisis.
Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 17. maja 2006 omogoča uporabo sredstev ESPG do letne zgornje meje v višini 500 milijonov EUR,
The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million.
Uredba (ES) št. 1927/2006 določa, da je 0,35 % največjega letnega zneska lahko vsako leto na voljo za tehnično pomoč na pobudo Komisije.
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 provides that 0,35 % of the annual maximum amount can be made available each year for technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission.
Zato bi bilo treba uporabiti sredstva ESPG, da se zagotovi tehnična pomoč na pobudo Komisije.
The EGF should, therefore, be mobilised in order to provide technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission.
V okviru splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2010 se iz Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji (ESPG) uporabi vsota 1 110 000 EUR za sredstva za prevzem obveznosti in sredstva za plačila.
For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 1 110 000 in commitment and payment appropriations.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. junija 2010 o preglednosti regionalne politike in njenem financiranju ( 2009/2232(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 15 June 2010 on transparency in regional policy and its funding ( 2009/2232(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zlasti členov 174 do 178 Pogodbe,
having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 174-178 thereof,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. februarja 2008 o preglednosti pri finančnih zadevah UL C 184 E, 6.8.2009, str.
having regard to its resolution of 19 February 2008 on transparency in financial matters OJ C 184 E, 6.8.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. marca 2009 o izvajanju Uredbe o strukturnih skladih 2007–2013: rezultati pogajanj glede nacionalnih strategij in operativnih programov kohezijske politike Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0165 .
having regard to its resolution of 24 March 2009 on the implementation of the Structural Funds Regulation 2007-2013: the results of the negotiations on the national cohesion strategies and the operational programmes Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0165 .
ob upoštevanju študije Evropskega parlamenta z naslovom Pobuda za preglednost podatkov in njen vpliv na kohezijsko politiko,
having regard to the study published by the European Parliament entitled ’The Data Transparency Initiative and its Impact on Cohesion Policy’,
ob upoštevanju zelene knjige Komisije z dne 3. maja 2006 o Pobudi za preglednost v Evropi ( KOM(2006)0194 ),
having regard to the Commission Green Paper of 3 May 2006 on the European Transparency Initiative ( COM(2006)0194 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 21. decembra 2009 z naslovom 20. letno poročilo o izvajanju strukturnih skladov (2008) ( KOM(2009)0617 /2),
having regard to the Commission's communication of 21 December 2009 entitled ’20th annual report on implementation of the structural funds (2008)’ ( COM(2009)0617 /2),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A7-0139/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A7-0139/2010 ),
ker je Komisija leta 2005 sprejela pobudo za preglednost v Evropi (ETI), leta 2006 pa objavila zeleno knjigo, da bi izboljšali preglednost, odprtost in odgovornost upravljanja EU, in ker pobuda za preglednost v Evropi temelji na zagotavljanju javnih podatkov o prejemnikih sredstev EU,
whereas the European Transparency Initiative (ETI) was adopted by the Commission in 2005, followed by the publication of the Green Paper in 2006 with the aim of improving the transparency, openness and accountability of EU governance, and whereas providing public information on the recipients of EU funds is a cornerstone of the ETI,
ker se v skupnem sistemu upravljanja z informacijami o prejemnikih sredstev EU upravlja na ravni držav članic, ker na ravni EU ni posebne obveznosti, ker ni strogega ’usmerjanja’ s strani Komisije in ker se stopnja javne dostopnosti do podatkov bistveno razlikuje v posameznih državah članicah, zaradi česar je primerjava na ravni EU zelo težka,
whereas, under the shared management system, information on beneficiaries of EU funds is managed at Member State level, and whereas, in the absence of a specific EU obligation or a strong ’steer’ from the Commission, the level to which such information is made public differs substantially from Member State to Member State, making an EU-wide comparison difficult,
ker razkritje prejemnikov sredstev EU omogoča sodelovanje javnosti v pomembni razpravi o porabi javnega denarja, kar je bistvenega pomena za delujočo demokracijo,
whereas the disclosure of EU fund recipients enables public participation in a meaningful debate about how public money is spent, which is essential for functioning democracies,
ker ni bila vzpostavljena povezava med pobudo za preglednost v Evropi in finančnim nadzorom in revizijo, ki sta bolj določena in zavezujoča,
whereas no link has been established between the ETI and the more regulated and binding issue of financial controls and auditing,
ker bi morala pobuda za preglednost v Evropi pomembno vplivati na zagotavljanje preglednega partnerstva v predhodnih in nadaljnjih stopnjah kohezijskega programskega cikla; ker pa uredbe ne določajo natančno, v kolikšni meri naj bi bili partnerji vključeni v različne postopke načrtovanja programov, pa tudi ne opredeljujejo ureditve takega sodelovanja,
whereas the ETI should have a significant effect in terms of ensuring transparent partnerships in the upstream and downstream phases of the cohesion programming cycle; whereas, however, the regulations do not spell out the specific extent to which partners should be involved in the different programming processes or specify arrangements for such involvement,
ker ni dovolj predhodnih informacij o sklepih Komisije o financiranju velikih projektov, zato tudi ni preglednosti, in ker bi bilo to treba odpraviti,
whereas there is insufficient prior information about Commission decisions on the funding of major projects, and thus a lack of transparency, and whereas this should be remedied,
ker bi moralo biti načelo preglednosti povezano s procesom poenostavljanja postopkov za pridobivanje strukturnih sredstev,
whereas the logic of transparency should go hand in hand with the process of simplifying the procedures for obtaining Structural Funds;
meni, da so preglednost pri kohezijski politiki in njenem programskem ciklu, dodelitev sredstev ter dostop do informacij za morebitne prejemnike strukturnih sredstev temeljni pogoji za uresničevanje splošnih ciljev kohezijske politike ter da bi morala preglednost postati vodilno medsektorsko načelo pri načrtovanju kohezijskih programov in odločanju o tem;
Considers that transparency in respect of cohesion policy and its programming cycle, allocation of expenditure and access to information for potential beneficiaries of the Structural Funds are key prerequisites for achieving the overall objectives of cohesion policy, and that transparency should therefore be introduced as a guiding cross-sectoral principle in the cohesion programming and decision-making processes;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj poskrbijo, da bo po teh zbirkah podatkov držav članic mogoče v celoti iskati podatke in da bodo te zbirke medsebojno skladne, s čimer se omogoči pregled nad predstavljenimi podatki na ravni celotne EU in obenem ohrani njihov lokalni pomen; meni, da je pri tem nujno treba uvesti dvojezične različice (lokalni jezik ali jeziki – eden od delovnih jezikov Komisije);
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make these Member State databases fully searchable and compatible, so as to facilitate an EU-wide overview of the data presented, while preserving their local relevance; is of the view that, in this respect, there is an urgent need for dual-language versions (local language(s)- one of the Commission working languages);
poudarja, da je treba izboljšati uporabnost posredovanih podatkov o prejemnikih po vsebini in predstavitvi; zato poziva Komisijo, naj natančno opredeli strukturo, obliko in vsebino posredovanih informacij ter s tem določi natančno in obvezno obliko; meni, da bi moralo zagotavljanje potrebnih informacij olajšati tudi iskanje po merilih, da bi takoj dobili pregled nad iskanimi elementi;
Stresses that the usefulness of the data provided on beneficiaries needs to be improved in terms of both content and presentation; calls, therefore, on the Commission to define a more detailed and prescriptive format specifying the structure, form and content of the information to be provided; believes that providing the necessary information should also facilitate a criterion-based search with a view to obtaining an immediate picture of the elements sought;
poziva, naj se zagotovijo dodatne bistvene informacije, ki jih je treba zagotoviti ob objavi seznamov prejemnikov in po potrebi seznamov zainteresiranih strani; zato priporoča, da se poleg sedanjih minimalnih zahtev preuči možnost, da se kot elementi pri razkritju prejemnikov vključijo tudi lokacija, povzetki odobrenih projektov, vrsta podpore in opis projektnih partnerjev; zahteva, da se zbrani podatki prikažejo ter da se z njimi upravlja strukturirano in primerljivo, da bodo v celoti uporabni in se omogoči dejanska preglednost; meni, da je to mogoče doseči brez dodatnih izdatkov;
Calls for additional essential information to be provided when publishing the lists of beneficiaries and where needed the lists of stakeholders; recommends, therefore, that besides the current minimum requirements, consideration be given to including location , summaries of approved projects, types of support and a description of the project partners as elements of the disclosure of beneficiaries; asks that the data collected should appear and should be managed in a structured, comparable way to ensure its full usability and in the interest of genuine transparency; considers that this can be done without giving rise to additional expenditure;
poziva, naj se za programe v okviru cilja evropskega teritorialnega sodelovanja navedejo vsi prejemniki in ne le glavni;
Asks that, for programmes under the European Territorial Cooperation objective, all beneficiaries – and not only the lead beneficiaries – be listed;
poudarja, da so za popolno skladnost z zahtevami v pobudi za večjo preglednost v Evropi potrebni ustrezni predpisi, boljša navodila, opozorilni mehanizem in kot skrajni ukrep sankcije za kršitve;
Underlines that full compliance with the ETI requirements is necessary by means of appropriate regulations, better guidance, a warning mechanism and sanctions in cases of non-compliance as a last resort;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni, kako bi bilo treba v praksi izvajati načela v pobudi za preglednost v Evropi na ravni operativnih programov in njihovih komunikacijskih načrtov; zato poudarja, da je treba uvesti jasnejša pravila o razkritju informacij o prejemnikih sredstev v skupnem upravljanju;
Calls on the Commission to clarify how the ETI principles should be put into practice in operational terms at the level of operational programmes and their communication plans; stresses therefore the need to introduce clearer rules regarding the disclosure of information on the beneficiaries of funds under shared management;
poudarja, da je treba besedila uredb in izvedbenih predpisov oblikovati tako, da bodo postopki pregledni, da bodo imeli morebitni prejemniki boljši dostop do strukturnih skladov in se bodo zmanjšala upravna bremena za sodelujoče, zlasti s številnimi glavnimi ukrepi, kot je javna objava navodil o izvajanju, o katerih so se dogovorile Komisija in države članice; poziva organe upravljanja v državah članicah, naj na pregleden način predstavijo vse stopnje projektov, ki se financirajo iz strukturnih skladov; ponovno izraža mnenje, da so dejavniki dobrega upravljanja pregledni in jasni postopki, in v pri tem pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije, da predstavi predloge za poenostavitev;
Underlines the need to formulate regulations and implementing rules in such a way that procedures are transparent, provide better access to the Structural Funds for potential beneficiaries and reduce administrative burdens for participants, particularly via a number of key measures such as making public the guidance notes on implementation agreed upon between the Commission and the Member States; calls on the managing authorities in the Member States to present, in transparent fashion, all stages of projects financed by the Structural Funds; reiterates its view that transparent and clear procedures are factors of good governance, and welcomes in this context the efforts made by the Commission to present simplification proposals;
ugotavlja, da se čezmejni in nadnacionalni programi soočajo s posebnimi težavami zaradi različnih upravnih kultur, nacionalnih predpisov in jezikov, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah, kar vpliva ne samo na količinske, ampak tudi na kakovostne vidike takih pobud; zato meni, da je zelo pomembno, da se oblikujejo posebna pravila o preglednosti pri usklajevanju in sodelovanju različnih organov upravljanja;
Notes that cross-border and transnational programmes face specific difficulties due to the different administrative culture, national regulations and languages being used in Member States, that affect not just the quantitative, but also the qualitative aspects of such initiatives; considers therefore that development of specific rules regarding transparency in coordination and cooperation among different managing authorities would be most important;
poudarja, da je sodeč po študiji Evropskega parlamenta o pobudi za preglednost v Evropi in njenem vplivu na kohezijsko politiko neizpolnjevanje minimalnih zahtev v pobudi povezano s pomanjkljivimi upravnimi zmogljivostmi pri organih za upravljanje in ne z nepripravljenostjo posredovati take podatke; glede na to poudarja, da je treba zagotoviti, da posredovanje dodatnih podatkov in informacij ne povzroči dodatnega upravnega bremena za morebitne prejemnike sredstev, še posebej ne za tiste, ki že zdaj s težavo izpolnjujejo upravne in finančne zahteve za nepovratna sredstva in javna naročila;
Underlines that, according to the EP's study on the ETI and its impact on Cohesion Policy, non-compliance with ETI minimum requirements relates to a lack of administrative capacity on the part of Managing Authorities rather than reluctance to provide such data; in that framework points out the need to assure that the provision of additional data and information does not result in an additional administrative burden for potential beneficiaries, especially for those already having difficulty in complying with the existing administrative and financial requirements for grants and public contracts;
poudarja, da mora Evropska komisija zahtevo za dodatne informacije in podatke povezati z dodatno tehnično podporo (delavnice s sodelovanjem uradnikov Komisije in lokalnega/regionalnega osebja, ki je odgovorno za upravljanje strukturnih skladov, izmenjava najboljših praks med organi upravljanja, objava konkretnih smernic) za morebitne prejemnike brez potrebnih tehničnih možnosti; meni, da je mogoče samo tako zagotoviti, da zaradi prizadevanj udeležencev za izpolnitev dodatnih zahtev o posredovanih podatkih in informacijah ne bo prišlo do preusmerjanja sredstev od samih dejavnosti pri izvajanju projekta;
Points out that the requirement for additional information and data has to be matched, on the part of the European Commission, by the provision of additional technical support (workshops with the participation of Commission's officials and local/regional staff responsible for the management of structural funds, exchange of best practices between Managing Authorities, publication of concrete guidelines) to potential beneficiaries which do not have the necessary technical capacity; considers this the only way to ensure that the participants’ efforts to comply with the additional requirements in terms of data and information provided will not result in a distortion of funds from the project implementation activities as such;
poudarja, kako pomembno v povezavi z nadzornim sistemom je, da države članice pravočasno posredujejo točne informacije, in da je zato treba povezati pobudo za preglednost v Evropi ter finančni nadzor in revizijo; ponovno izraža mnenje, da mora sistem zgodnjega opozarjanja delovati tudi v tesni povezavi s centralno podatkovno zbirko o izključitvah;
Stresses the importance of accurate and timely information delivery by the Member States in the context of the control system, and thus the need to establish a link between the ETI and financial controls and auditing; reiterates its view that the early warning system (EWS) should also work closely with the Central Exclusion Database;
poziva Komisijo, naj spremlja uporabo večjih predplačil, ki jih države članice prejmejo v skladu s poenostavitvami iz leta 2009 v povezavi z Uredbo (ES) št. 1083/2006;
Requests the Commission to monitor the utilisation of increased advance payments received by the Member States in accordance with the 2009 simplifications related to Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006;
ponovno zahteva posredovanje informacij o izterjavah in preklicih sredstev v okviru pobude za preglednost v Evropi; poziva države članice, naj te informacije posredujejo v celoti, ter Komisijo, naj jih skupaj z informacijami o finančnih popravkih po ugotovljenih kršitvah da na voljo proračunskemu organu in javnosti ter tako zagotovi visok standard verodostojnosti in odgovornosti v odnosu do evropske javnosti;
Reiterates its request for the provision of information regarding recoveries and withdrawals under the ETI; urges the Member States to provide this information in full, and the Commission to make it available to the budgetary authority and the public along with information on financial corrections following a confirmed case of fraud, thus ensuring high standards of credibility and responsibility vis-à-vis the European public;
poziva revizorje, naj zahteve za obveščanje in informacije obravnavajo strožje, tudi s ’poimenovanjem in izpostavitvijo kršiteljev’, zlasti če gre za vladnega akterja, ter k izvajanju finančnih popravkov pri ugotovljenih kršitvah;
Urges auditors to take a tougher line on communication and information requirements, including ’naming and shaming’ - particularly if a governmental actor is involved - and the use of financial corrections in confirmed cases of fraud;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije in Računskega sodišča pri usklajevanju njunih revizijskih metodologij;
Welcomes the efforts made by the Commission and the Court of Auditors to harmonise their auditing methodologies;
poudarja, da so minimalni standardi posvetovanja sestavni del pobude za preglednost v Evropi, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da Komisija te standarde spodbuja in uporablja pri kohezijski politiki; Komisijo kljub temu poziva, naj zainteresiranim stranem omogoči posredovati povratne informacije o kakovosti samega posvetovalnega procesa; poziva regije in države članice, naj pri posvetovanju z zainteresiranimi stranmi upoštevajo dosedanje izkušnje EU;
Highlights the fact that minimum standards of consultation are a component of the ETI, and welcomes the fact that these standards have been promoted and applied by the Commission in respect of cohesion policy; calls, however, on the Commission to allow stakeholders to give appropriate feedback on the quality of the consultation process itself; calls on regions and Member States to draw on existing EU experience in consulting interested parties;
ponavlja, da je partnerstvo temeljni pogoj za preglednost, odzivnost, učinkovitost in zakonitost na vseh stopnjah kohezijskega načrtovanja in izvajanja ter lahko poveča zavezanost rezultatom programov in njihovo javno lastništvo; zato poziva države članice in organe upravljanja, naj v celoti na vseh stopnjah kohezijskega načrtovanja in izvajanja tesneje vključijo regionalne in lokalne organe ter druge ustrezne partnerje, tudi z vzpostavitvijo internetnih platform na nacionalni ravni, ki bodo zagotavljale preglednost nad obstoječimi sredstvi in operativnimi programi, in s spodbujanjem dobre prakse na druge načine; poleg tega naj jim omogočijo popoln dostop do celotne projektne dokumentacije, da bi lahko bolje uporabili njihove izkušnje, znanje in dobro prakso;
Reiterates its view that partnership is a prerequisite for transparency, responsiveness, efficiency and legitimacy in all the phases of cohesion programming and implementation, and can increase commitment to, and public ownership of, programme outputs; calls, therefore, on the Member States and managing authorities fully to involve regional and local authorities and other relevant partners more closely in all the phases of cohesion programming and implementation, including through an internet platform at national level providing visibility for existing funds and operational programmes and through good-practice promotion by other means, and to give them full access to all project documentation, with a view to making better use of their experience, knowledge and best practices;