natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker evropski pomorski promet predstavlja sektor, ki se stalno razvija in deluje na posebno globaliziranem in konkurenčnem trgu, za katerega so značilne nove oblike sodelovanja, združevanja in povezovanja, ki nenehno spreminjajo tudi razmere in pogoje na trgu pomorskega prometa, in ker številne velike ladjarske družbe težijo h koncentraciji,
whereas European shipping is a sector which is constantly developing and operates in a particularly globalised and competitive market characterised by new forms of cooperation, mergers and alliances which are constantly transforming the circumstances and conditions of the market in maritime transport, and whereas there is a tendency towards concentrations in a number of large shipping companies,
ker je bil pomorski promet do sedaj razdeljen v dve glavni kategoriji: (a) na trg linijskih prevoznih storitev, t.j. rednih storitev in (b) na trg storitev mednarodnega izrednega ladijskega prometa, t.j. izrednih storitev, in ker so linijski prevozi od leta 1875 organizirani po sistemu linijskih konferenc, medtem ko se storitve druge kategorije izvajajo na način, ki ni reden, in so prevozne tarife predmet prostih pogajanj glede na ponudbo in povpraševanje,
whereas maritime transport has so far fallen into two major categories: (a) the liner services market, i.e. scheduled services and (b) the market in international tramp vessel services, i.e. non-scheduled services, and whereas the first category of liner services has since 1875 been organised according to the system of liner conferences, while the second category operates in a non-scheduled manner and freight rates are freely negotiated according to supply and demand,
ker je stabilizacijsko vlogo konferenc priznal tudi Kodeks vedenja linijskih konferenc Konference Združenih narodov o trgovini in razvoju,
whereas the stabilising role of conferences was recognised in the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development,
ker so bile z Uredbo (EGS) št. 4056/86 linijske konference izvzete iz pravil o politiki konkurence (člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe) in hkrati dovoljena prosta trgovina, kar pomeni, da je pomembna konkurenca zagotovljena od zunaj, medtem ko so storitve v mednarodnem izrednem ladijskem prometu in storitve pomorske kabotaže (storitve pomorskega prometa izključno med pristanišči ene in iste države članice) izključene iz pravil za izvajanje konkurence Skupnosti (Uredba (ES) št. 1/2003),
whereas Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 exempted conferences from the rules of competition policy (Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty), but allowed free trade, which means that substantive competition from outsiders is ensured, while international tramp vessel services and cabotage services (maritime transport services that take place exclusively between ports in one and the same Member State) are excluded from the Community competition implementing rules (Regulation (EC) No 1/2003),
ker se že pojavljajo druge oblike sodelovanja, kot so konzorciji družb linijskih prevozov, za katere prav tako velja skupinska izjema (Uredba (ES) št. 823/2000, ki je bila spremenjena, med drugim z Uredbo (ES) št. 611/2005 Uredba Komisije (ES) št. 611/2005 z dne 20. aprila 2005 o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 823/2000 o uporabi člena 81(3) Pogodbe za nekatere vrste sporazumov, sklepov in usklajenih ravnanj med ladjarskimi družbami za linijske prevoze (konzorciji) (UL L 101, 21.4.2005, str.
whereas other forms of cooperation are already appearing, such as consortia of liner shipping companies, which are also the subject of a block exemption (Regulation (EC) No 823/2000, which has been amended, inter alia by Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 Commission Regulation (EC) No 611/2005 of 20 April 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 823/2000 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to certain categories of agreements, decisions and concerted practices between liner shipping companies (consortia) (OJ L 101, 21.4.2005, p.
); ker je njihov obseg različen, saj uredba ne more določiti priporočenih cen,
); whereas, however, their scope is different because reference rates cannot be set under the regulation,
ker ima izjema za linijske konference, ki velja zadnjih devetnajst let, pomembno regulatorno vlogo pri razvoju mednarodne trgovine in ker se zdi sedanja ureditev konferenc veliko bolj "liberalna" kot v preteklosti, pri čemer pa ohranja prednosti zagotavljanja zanesljivih storitev linijskih prevozov po konkurenčnih cenah,
whereas the exemption for liner conferences which has been in effect for the last nineteen years has played a significant regulatory role in the development of international trade, and the present conference regime appears much more "liberal" than in the past, while retaining the advantages of providing reliable liner services at competitive rates,
ker se je v obdobju 1997 - 2004 obseg mednarodne trgovine, ki so jo upravljali glavni sistemi linijskih konferenc, izredno povečal, znatno (z nekaj nihanji) pa se je povečal tudi obseg tovrstne trgovine manjših sistemov konferenc,
whereas over the period 1997 - 2004 there was a remarkable increase in the volume of international trade handled by major liner conference systems and a significant increase in the volume of such trade handled by minor conference systems (with some fluctuations),
ker je Komisija v zvezi s pregledom Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 sklenila, da:
whereas, as regards the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, the Commission concludes that:
izvzetost konferenc linijskih prevozov ni več upravičena,
there is no further justification for exempting liner shipping conferences,
ni več upravičenega razloga za izključitev storitev izrednega ladijskega prometa in pomorske kabotaže iz pravil za izvajanje konkurence,
there is no justification for the exclusion of tramp services and cabotage from the competition implementing rules,
ni več utemeljenega razloga za ohranjanjanje določb o tehničnih sporazumih ali koliziji zakonov in zato predlaga, da se odpravijo;
there is no valid reason for maintaining the provisions for technical agreements or the conflict of laws provision and proposes that they be abolished;
ker večina vpletenih strani podpira revizijo obstoječe ureditve z namenom doseganja stabilnosti cen, učinkovitih in visoko kakovostnih storitev ter nadaljnje konkurenčnosti družb linijskih prevozov ter malih in srednje velikih ladjarskih družb,
whereas a majority of the parties involved is in favour of a review of the existing regime with a view to achieving price stability, effective, high-quality services and the continued competitiveness of liner shipping companies and small and medium-sized shipping companies,
ker je izvedlo svetovalno podjetje Global Insight na pobudo Komisije študijo vplivov, za oceno posledic, ki bi jih lahko povzročila preklic in nadomestitev skupinske izjeme za linijske konference, določene v Uredbi (EGS) št. 4056/86, s sistemom, ki temelji na alternativnem predlogu ELAA;
whereas an impact study was carried out by consulting firm Global Insight, on the Commission's initiative, with a view to assessing the consequences which might ensue if the block exemption for liner conferences provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 were to be repealed and replaced with a system based on the alternative proposal put forward by the ELAA;
poziva Komisijo in vse vpletene strani k razumevanju, da naj bi bilnamen pregleda Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 ohraniti in spodbuditi širitev samozadostnega in konkurenčnega evropskega sektorja pomorskega prometa znotraj okvira lizbonske strategije v povezavi s strategijo prometne politike, kakor je povzeta v Beli knjigi ter programih Marco Polo I in Marco Polo II, in kar je bistvenega pomena predvsem zaradi pojava novih pomorskih sil, zlasti Kitajske, Južne Koreje in Tajvana;
Calls upon the Commission and all parties concerned to understand that the purpose of the review of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 should be to preserve, and promote the expansion of, a viable and competitive European shipping sector within the framework of the Lisbon Strategy in conjunction with transport policy strategy, as summarised in the White Paper and the Marco Polo I and the Marco Polo II programmes, and that it is vital to do so especially in view of the fact that new maritime powers have emerged, namely China, South Korea, and Taiwan;
poziva Komisijo, da natančno preuči posledice morebitnega alternativnega sistema za celoten sektor pomorskega prometa, in sicer za člane in nečlane linijskih konferenc ter njihovo konkurenco (neodvisne subjekte), njihove stranke (vkrcevalce) in končne potrošnike;
Calls upon the Commission carefully to consider the consequences of a possible alternative system for the entire marine transport sector, namely members and non-members of liner conferences and their competitors (independent bodies) their customers (shippers) and the final consumers;
ugotavlja, da zaključki študije Global Insight ne zagotavljajo trdne osnove za odpravo skupinske izjeme za pomorske konference, saj se tudi ta zadnja študija ni zares ukvarjala s pomanjkljivostmi glede obsega in podatkov, izpostavljenimi v predhodnih študijah; poziva Komisijo, da navedeno upošteva v okviru svojega novega predloga (črtano) ter se o tem posvetuje z zadevnimi subjekti, Parlamentom in Svetom;
Notes that the conclusions of the study by Global Insight do not provide a solid basis for abolishing the block exemption for maritime conferences, as the shortcomings outlined in previous studies in terms of scope and data were not really dealt with in this latest study either; calls upon the Commission to take this into consideration in the framework of its new proposal and to discuss it with the circles concerned, with Parliament and with the Council;
poziva Komisijo, naj v primeru spreminjanja Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 upošteva obstoječe pravne in postopkovne ureditve v drugih državah (ZDA, Avstralija, Japonska in Kanada), saj bi vsako neujemanje evropskega sistema v povezavi s temi ureditvami lahko negativno vplivalo na socialno-ekonomsko stabilnost po vsem svetu in pripeljalo do zaščitnih ukrepov;
Calls upon the Commission, in the event of amendment of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86, to bear in mind existing legal and operating regimes in other countries (USA, Australia, Japan and Canada), since any misalignment of the European system in relation to those regimes might create destabilising socio-economic effects worldwide and lead to protectionist measures;
poudarja verjetnost negativih posledic v primeru splošne obnove sistema, ne toliko za velike trgovske družbe linijskih prevozov, kakor za male in srednje velike, ter poudarja, da ni dokazov o tem, da bi odprava linijskih konferenc povzročila padec cen;
Emphasises the likelihood of adverse consequences in the event of a general overhaul of the system, not so much for large merchant shipping lines, but rather for small and medium-sized ones, and emphasises also that there is no evidence that the abolition of liner conferences will bring about a fall in prices;
ugotavlja, da bo popolna liberalizacija z odpravo izjem za linijske konference iz Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 sprožila potrebo po ustreznih spremembah Uredbe (ES) št. 823/2000, ki je bila že spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 611/2005, ki določa skupinsko izjemo za konzorcije ladijskih družb za linijske prevoze;
Notes that full liberalisation involving the abolition of the exemptions for liner conferences provided for in Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 will necessitate corresponding changes to Regulation (EC) No 823/2000, which was itself amended by Regulation (EC) No 611/2005, which provides for block exemptions for consortia of liner shipping companies;·
vztraja, da bo morala kakršna koli uredba za sektor upoštevati naravo regij, ki so na poseben način omejene, kakor na primer tip regij, opisanih v členu 299(2) Pogodbe, ki so odvisne od nadaljnjega zagotavljanja posebnih storitev;
Maintains that any regulation in the sector will need to allow for the nature of regions affected by specific constraints, for example regions of the type described in Article 299(2) of the Treaty, which depend on the continued provision of services with special characteristics;
poudarja pomen naraščajočega števila oblik sodelovanja, če so ta v skladu s konkurenčnim pravom Skupnosti, kakor so na primer okvirni dogovori, na podlagi katerih lahko prevozniki, ne glede na to ali so člani konference ali ne, lažje usklajujejo svoje konkurenčno ravnanje na trgu v zvezi s prevoznimi tarifami in drugimi pogoji storitev;
Underscores, as far as they comply with Community competition law, the importance of an increasing number of forms of cooperation, such as framework agreements, by virtue of which carriers, whether or not they are members of conferences, are able flexibly to coordinate their competitive conduct on the market in relation to freight rates and other service conditions;
na osnovi sodne prakse Sodišča prve stopnje (združeni primeri T-191/98, T-212/98 do T-214/98 Atlantic Container Line AB in drugi
Concludes, on the basis of the case-law of the Court of First Instance (Joined Cases T-191/98, T-212/98 to T-214/98 Atlantic Container Line AB and Others
, "primer TACA") sklepa, da je reguliranje zmogljivosti plovil dovoljeno le, kadar vzporedno s povečanjem prevoznih tarif povpraševanje ni umetno ustvarjeno in kadar je pristojnost konferenc za določanje prevoznih tarif močno omejena ter so s tem izpolnjeni štirje kumulativni pogoji iz člena 81(3) Pogodbe, čeprav le delno;
"the TACA case"), that the regulation of vessel capacity is permissible only if no artificial demand is created along with increases in freight rates and only if the power of conferences to fix freight rates has been significantly limited, the four cumulative conditions laid down in Article 81(3) of the Treaty thus being fulfilled, if only partially;
poudarja, da čeprav Uredba (EGS) št. 4056/86 potrjuje sistem zaprtih konferenc, hkrati omogoča prosto trgovino, kar pomeni, da zagotavlja pomembno konkurenco zunanjih družb in ne dovoljuje dodatnih omejitev konkurence s strani linijskih konferenc;
Points out that while Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 endorses the system of closed conferences, it also allows free trade, which means that substantive competition from outsiders is ensured and that no further restrictions on competition from liner conferences is permitted;
podpira namero Komisije o pregledu - ne pa razveljavitvi - Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 z namenom zagotoviti skladnost s pravili konkurence, predvsem z izključitvijo možnosti neposrednega določanja cen prevozov in z dovoljenjem konferencam za določanje priporočenih cen ali indeksa cen v okviru nadomestnega sistema, v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, in ob zagotavljanju, da se dodatne tarife in z njimi povezani stroški izračunajo na pregleden način in po posvetovanju z vkrcevalci, ter poudarja, da mora vsak takšen pregled ščititi stabilnost prevoznih tarif, visoko kakovost storitev in lojalno konkurenco za podjetja vseh velikosti;
Supports the Commission's intention to review - rather than repeal - Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 with a view to ensuring compatibility with the rules of competition, chiefly by excluding the possibility of a direct fixing of freight prices and by authorising the fixing by the conferences of a reference price or a price index under an alternative system, in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Justice, and by ensuring that surcharges and associated costs are calculated transparently and after dialogue with shippers, and stresses that any such review must safeguard the stability of freight rates, the high quality of services and sound competition for all enterprises, whatever their size;
meni, da predlog ELAA vsebuje zanimive postavke, vključno z uvedbo indeksa cen in ustanovitve foruma za razpravo za prevoznike, vkrcevalce in druge sodelujoče v sektorju, ki bi jih Komisija v skladu s pravili konkurence morala uporabiti pri pripravi katere koli uredbe, ki kaj spreminja, in da bi katera koli takšna nova uredba lahko začela veljati za omejeno obdobje petih let, po izteku katerega pa bi sledila njena ocena; meni, da bi morala Komisija preučiti skladnost teh točk s štirimi kumulativni pogoji, določenimi v členu 81(3) Pogodbe;
Takes the view that the proposal of the ELAA contains interesting points, including the introduction of a price index and the creation of discussion forums for carriers, shippers and other industry players, which should be taken up by the Commission, pursuant to competition rules, in drafting any amending regulation, and that any such new regulation might be made to come into force for a limited period of five years after the expiry of which an assessment would be carried out; takes the view that the Commission should examine the compliance of these points with the four cumulative conditions laid down in Article 81(3) of the Treaty;
meni, da je treba ne glede na izbrano alternativno rešitev predvideti prehodno obdobje, kar bo vsem izvajalcem (prevoznikom, vkrcevalcem in drugim sodelujočim v sektorju) omogočilo prilagoditev na nov ureditveni okvir;
Considers that, whichever alternative solution is chosen, a transitional period should be envisaged to enable all operators (carriers, shippers and other industry players) to adapt to the new regulatory framework;
poziva Komisijo, da se v skladu s svojimi pooblastili in na osnovi obvez, izhajajočih iz Kodeksa vedenja linijskih konferenc, pred predlaganjem spreminjanja ali razveljavitve Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86 posvetuje z ostalimi pogodbenimi strankami; meni, da bi se na teh posvetovanjih moralo poiskati državam članicam (ki imajo v skladu s Kodeksom vedenja še vedno dvostranske obveznosti) najustreznejšo metodo za prilagoditev možnega novega pravnega položaja, da bi se s tem izognili kakršnim koli škodljivim posledicam;
Calls upon the Commission, within its terms of reference and on the basis of undertakings under the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences to hold discussions with the other contracting parties before proposing amendment or repeal of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86; believes that those discussions should seek to find the most appropriate method of adaptation for Member States (those than still have bilateral commitments under the Code of Conduct) to the possible new legal status, with a view to avoiding any adverse consequences;
Mednarodni izredni ladijski promet in storitve pomorske kabotaže
International tramp vessel and cabotage services
poudarja, da sektor izrednega ladijskega prometa ostaja v veliki meri liberaliziran in deluje po pravilih lojalne konkurence; podpira predlog Komisije, da se te storitve vključijo v področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) 1/2003;
Points out that the tramp sector remains overwhelmingly deregulated and operates on the basis of the rules of fair competition; supports the Commission proposal for these services to be brought within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;
meni, da je v interesu pravne varnosti in jasnosti, da Komisija določi smernice v zvezi z združljivostjo velikih združenj (bulk pools) in specializiranih storitev (specialised trades) s pravili konkurence, vendar ob upoštevanju pogoja, da tega ne sme storiti pred objavo predlogov in zaključkom posvetovanj z zadevnimi subjekti;
Considers it to be in the interests of legal certainty and clarity that the Commission should establish, in a single process, guidelines as regards the compatibility of bulk pools and specialised trades with the rules of competition, subject to the proviso, however, that it should not do so until the proposals have been published and consultations held with the circles concerned;
poudarja, da je bil sektor storitev pomorske kabotaže že liberaliziran z Uredbo (EGS) št. 3577/92; meni, da ker se te storitve izvajajo med pristanišči ene in iste države članice, to ne vpliva na trgovino med državami članicami v okviru Skupnosti (člena 81 in 82 Pogodbe), zato ni potrebe ali zakonske obveznosti za vključitev tega sektorja v področje uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 1/2003;
Points out that the cabotage services sector has already been deregulated pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92; takes the view that given that these services are carried out between ports in one and the same Member State, intra-Community trade between the Member States is not affected (Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty) and consequently there is no need or legal obligation for this sector to be brought within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003;
poziva Komisijo, da ne nadaljuje s predlogom za odpravo ukrepov iz člena 2 Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86, ki urejajo pravno veljavnost tehničnih sporazumov, saj meni, da bo ohranitev jasnega pravnega okvira za tehnične sporazume prispevala k pravni varnosti in boljši orientaciji ponudnikov storitev;
Calls upon the Commission not to continue with the proposal to abolish the arrangements contained in Article 2 of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 governing the legality of technical agreements, since it believes that retaining a purely legal framework governing technical agreements will contribute to legal certainty and a better orientation for service providers;
poziva Komisijo, da ne nadaljuje z predlogom razveljavitve člena 9 Uredbe (EGS) št. 4056/86, v skladu s katerim se v primeru kolizije med zakoni Skupnosti in zakoni tretjih držav začnejo pogajanja, predvsem glede namena Komisije, da spremeni pravila o konkurenci v zvezi s pomorskim prometom;
Calls upon the Commission not to continue with the proposal to repeal Article 9 of Regulation (EEC) No 4056/86 which provides for negotiations to be held in the event of a conflict between Community law and the law of third countries, especially in view of the Commission's intention to revise competition law relating to maritime transport;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o pravni ureditvi in trgih evropskih elektronskih komunikacij 2004 ( 2005/2052(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on European electronic communications regulation and markets 2004 ( 2005/2052(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Pravna ureditev in trgi evropskih elektronskih komunikacij 2004" ( KOM(2004)0759 ),
having regard to the communication from the Commission, entitled 'European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004' ( COM(2004)0759 ),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva z Evropskega sveta z dne 22. in 23. marca 2005,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Brussels European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005,
ob upoštevanju poročila skupine na visoki ravni o lizbonski strategiji iz novembra 2004,
having regard to the High-Level Group report of November 2004 on the Lisbon Strategy,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 18. novembra 2003 o osmem poročilu Komisije o izvajanju regulativnega okvira za telekomunikacije UL C 87 E, 7.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 18 November 2003 on the eighth report from the Commission on the implementation of the telecommunications regulatory package OJ C 87 E, 7.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 12. februarja 2003 o načinih splošnega uvajanja mobilnih komunikacij tretje generacije UL C 43 E, 19.2.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 12 February 2003 on the full roll-out of third generation mobile communications OJ C 43 E, 19.2.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/19/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o dostopu do elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in pripadajočih naprav ter o njihovem medomrežnem povezovanju (Direktiva o dostopu) UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (Access Directive) OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju Direktive 2002/20/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 7. marca 2002 o odobritvi elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in storitev (Direktiva o odobritvi) UL L 108, 24.4.2002, str.
having regard to Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (Authorisation Directive) OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p.