natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da se je vrednost eura v obdobju močnega nihanja deviznih tečajev povečala, še zlasti v razmerju do ameriškega dolarja in renminbija, ter je zaskrbljen, da bi to lahko negativno vplivalo na konkurenčnost euroobmočja;
Points out that, during a period of high-level exchange rate volatility, the euro has increased its strength, particularly against the US dollar and the renminbi, and expresses concern that this could have a detrimental effect on the competitiveness of the euro area;
priznava, da se je euro okrepil deloma zaradi šibke gospodarske dejavnosti v ZDA, kjer se je primanjkljaj tekočega računa močno zmanjšal na manj kot 3 % BDP leta 2009 in primanjkljaj zveznega proračuna povečal na približno 10 % BDP v proračunskem letu 2009, medtem ko je bil padec eura povezan tudi s pomanjkanjem zaupanja na globalnih trgih v nekaterih zelo zadolženih državah članicah EU; je zaskrbljen zaradi povečanja denarja v obtoku v ZDA in v manjši meri v EU;
Acknowledges that the strength of the euro was partly due to weak economic activity in the US, where the current account deficit narrowed sharply to below 3% of GDP in 2009 and the federal budget deficit widened to about 10% of GDP in the fiscal year 2009, while the decline of the euro was, among other things, also connected to the lack of trust in global markets in some highly-indebted EU Member States; shares concerns about the expansion of the volume of money in the US and, to a lesser extent, in the EU;
je zaskrbljen zaradi vpliva nihanja menjalnih tečajev in operacij špekulativnega najemanja posojil carry trade na globalno finančno stabilnost in realno gospodarstvo;
Is concerned about the impact of exchange rate volatility and carry trade operations on both global financial stability and the real economy;
poudarja, da se mora euroobmočje ne glede na sedanjo globalno finančno in gospodarsko krizo, širiti naprej, a opozarja, da je izpolnjevanje maastrichtskih meril pogoj za članstvo v tem območju; odobrava hitro sprejetje eura v vseh državah članicah, ki ta merila izpolnjujejo;
Underlines that, regardless of the current global financial and economic crisis, the euro area should be further enlarged, but points out that meeting the Maastricht criteria is regarded as a precondition for euro membership; welcomes the quick adoption of the euro by all Member States which comply with these criteria;
meni, da sprejetje eura v Estoniji odraža njegov status kljub krizi javnega dolga; je prepričan, da bo navedeni status spodbudil države članice, da bodo zaprosile za članstvo v euroobmočju;
Believes that the adoption of the euro by Estonia shows the status of the euro, despite the public debt crisis; believes that this status will encourage Member States to seek membership of the euro area;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. novembra 2010 o civilno-vojaškem sodelovanju in razvoju civilno-vojaških zmogljivosti ( 2010/2071(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 23 November 2010 on civilian-military cooperation and the development of civilian-military capabilities ( 2010/2071(INI) )
ob upoštevanju evropske varnostne strategije z naslovom „Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu“, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2003, in poročila o njenem izvajanju z naslovom „Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu“, ki ga je Evropski svet podprl 11. in 12. decembra 2008,
having regard to the European Security Strategy entitled ‘A secure Europe in a better world’, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2003, and to the report on its implementation entitled ‘Providing security in a changing world’, endorsed by the European Council on 11-12 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju strategije o notranji varnosti za Evropsko unijo, ki jo je Evropski svet podprl 25. in 26. marca 2010,
having regard to the Internal Security Strategy for the European Union, endorsed by the European Council on 25-26 March 2010,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 26. aprila 2010 o skupni varnostni in obrambni politiki,
having regard to the Council conclusions on CSDP adopted on 26 April 2010,
ob upoštevanju zaključkov o evropski varnostni in obrambni politiki in izjave z naslovom „Deset let EVOP – izzivi in priložnosti“, ki jo je Svet sprejel 17. novembra 2009,
having regard to the ESDP conclusions and the declaration entitled ‘ESDP Ten Years – Challenges and Opportunities’, adopted by the Council on 17 November 2009,
ob upoštevanju izjave o okrepitvi EVOP, ki jo je Evropski svet sprejel 12. decembra 2008, in izjave o krepitvi zmogljivosti, ko jo je Svet sprejel 11. decembra 2008,
having regard to the declaration on the enhancement of the European Security and Defence Policy, adopted by the European Council on 12 December 2008, and to the declaration on strengthening capabilities, adopted by the Council on 11 December 2008,
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki jih je Evropski svet sprejel v Santi Marii de Feira 20. junija 2000 in v Göteborgu 16. junija 2001, programa EU za preprečevanje nasilnih konfliktov, ki je bil prav tako sprejet v Göteborgu 16. junija 2001, civilnega globalnega cilja 2008, ki ga je Evropski svet potrdil 17. decembra 2004, in civilnega globalnega cilja 2010, ki ga je Evropski svet potrdil 19. novembra 2007,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions adopted by the European Council at Santa Maria de Feira on 20 June 2000 and at Göteborg on 16 June 2001, to the EU Programme for the Prevention of Violent Conflicts also adopted at Göteborg on 16 June 2001, to the Civilian Headline Goal 2008, approved by the European Council on 17 December 2004, and to the Civilian Headline Goal 2010, approved by the Council on 19 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva, ki jih je Evropski svet sprejel v Helsinkih 11. decembra 1999 (globalni cilj 2003), in globalnega cilja 2010, ki ga je Svet potrdil 17. maja 2004,
having regard to the Presidency conclusions adopted by the European Council at Helsinki on 11 December 1999 (Headline Goal 2003) and to the Headline Goal 2010, approved by the Council on 17 May 2004,
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 30. novembra 2009 o krepitvi kemične, biološke, radiološke in jedrske (KBRJ) varnosti v Evropski uniji in odobritvi akcijskega načrta EU na področju KBRJ,
having regard to the Council conclusions of 30 November 2009 on strengthening chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) security in the European Union and approving an EU CBRN Action Plan,
ob upoštevanju dokumenta Sveta z naslovom „Izvajanje RVSZN 1325, okrepljene z RVSZN 1820, v okviru EVOP“ z dne 3. decembra 2008 in dokumenta Sveta z naslovom „Vključevanje človekovih pravic v EVOP“ z dne 14. septembra 2006,
having regard to the Council paper ‘Implementation of UNSCR 1325 as reinforced by UNSCR 1820 in the context of ESDP’ of 3 December 2008, and to the Council document on ‘Mainstreaming of Human Rights into ESDP’ of 14 September 2006,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. februarja 2010 o nedavnem potresu na Haitiju, v kateri poziva k ustanovitvi enote civilne zaščite EU Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0015 .
having regard to its resolution of 10 February 2010 on the recent earthquake in Haiti, which calls for the establishment of an EU Civil Protection Force Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0015 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 10. marca 2010 o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije ter skupne varnostne in obrambne politike Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0061 .
having regard to its resolution of 10 March 2010 on the implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0061 .
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta o organizaciji in delovanju Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje UL L 201, 3.8.2010, str.
having regard to the Council Decision of 26 July 2010 establishing the organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service OJ L 201, 3.8.2010, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0308/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0308/2010 ),
ponovno opozarja, da se je EU zavezala, da bo opredelila in zasledovala skupno politiko in dejavnosti za ohranjanje miru, preprečevanje konfliktov, podporo obnovi po konfliktih in krepitev mednarodne varnosti v skladu z načeli Ustanovne listine OZN, pa tudi za podporo in zaščito demokracije, pravne države, človekovih pravic in načel mednarodnega prava, ter da bo pomagala prebivalcem, ki se spopadajo z naravnimi nesrečami ali nesrečami, ki jih povzroči človek;
Recalls that the EU has committed itself to defining and pursuing common policies and actions to preserve peace, prevent conflicts, consolidate post-conflict rehabilitation and strengthen international security in accordance with the principles of the UN Charter, as well as to consolidate and support democracy, the rule of law, human rights and the principles of international law, and to assist populations facing natural or man-made disasters;
poudarja, da EU predvsem prek svojega civilnega kriznega upravljanja ponuja občuten prispevek k svetovni varnosti, saj posreduje svoje temeljne vrednote in načela;
Underlines that the EU, mainly through its civilian crisis management, offers a distinct contribution to global security, reflecting its core values and principles;
poudarja, da je današnje krize in varnostne grožnje, vključno z naravnimi nesrečami, pogosto treba obravnavati s civilnimi in z vojaškimi zmogljivosti, zahtevajo pa tudi tesnejše sodelovanje med njimi; ponovno opozarja, da sta razvoj celovitega pristopa Evropske unije in njenih kombiniranih vojaških in civilnih zmogljivosti kriznega upravljanja specifični značilnosti SVOP in predstavljata njeno ključno dodano vrednost; obenem opozarja, da SVOP ni edino razpoložljivo orodje in da je treba misije SVOP uporabljati kot del širše strategije EU;
Stresses that effective responses to present-day crises and security threats, including natural disasters, often need to be able to draw on both civilian and military capabilities and require closer cooperation between them; recalls that the development of the EU's comprehensive approach and of its combined military and civilian crisis management capabilities have been distinctive features of the CSDP and represent its core added value; recalls at the same time that the CSDP is not the only tool available and that CSDP missions should be used as part of a broader EU strategy;
ponovno poudarja, da je treba sprejeti belo knjigo EU o varnosti in obrambi, ki bi temeljila na sistematičnih in strogih pregledih varnosti in obrambe, ki bi jih izvajale države v skladu s skupnimi merili in časovnim razporedom, in bi jasneje opredelila varnostne in obrambne cilje, interese in potrebe Unije v povezavi s sredstvi in viri, ki so na voljo; poudarja, da bi morala bela knjiga tudi opredeliti področja, na katerih, in pogoje, pod katerimi je zaželeno večje civilno-vojaško sodelovanje, da pripomore k uresničitvi teh ciljev; meni, da bi morala bela knjiga EU jasno opredeliti možnosti za združevanje virov na ravni EU ter nacionalne specializacije in uskladitve zmogljivosti, da bi se dosegle ekonomije velikega obsega;
Recalls the need for an EU White Paper on security and defence, based on systematic and rigorous security and defence reviews conducted by the States according to common criteria and a common timetable, which would define the Union's security and defence objectives, interests and needs more clearly in relation to the means and resources available; emphasises that the White Paper should also define areas in which, and conditions under which, greater civilian-military cooperation is desirable to help achieve those objectives; takes the view that the EU White Paper should identify explicitly opportunities for the pooling of resources at EU level, as well as national specialisation and capability harmonisation, in order to achieve large economies of scale;
poudarja, da bi morala ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) dodatno prispevati k razvoju res celovitega evropskega pristopa k civilnemu in vojaškemu kriznemu upravljanju, preprečevanju konfliktov in vzpostavljanju miru tako, da bi EU opremila z ustreznimi strukturami, različnimi kadri in finančnimi viri za izpolnjevanje njene globalne odgovornosti v skladu z Ustanovno listino OZN;
Emphasises that the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS) should contribute further to the development of a truly comprehensive European approach to civilian and military crisis management, conflict prevention and peace-building and provide the EU with adequate structures, staffing levels and financial resources to meet its global responsibilities in line with the UN Charter;
popolnoma podpira premestitev struktur SVOP, vključno z direktoratom za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje, civilno zmogljivostjo za načrtovanje in izvajanje operacij, vojaškim osebjem EU in situacijskim centrom, v ESZD, pod neposredno oblast in pristojnost podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko; ponovno opozarja na obljubo podpredsednice/visoke predstavnice, da bo zagotovila, da bodo delovali v tesnem sodelovanju in sinergiji s pristojnimi enotami Komisije, premeščenimi v ESZD, ki se ukvarjajo z načrtovanjem in programiranje odzivanja na krizne razmere, preprečevanjem konfliktov in izgradnjo miru; poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj zagotovi, da bodo te enote delovale na enakovredni ravni s strukturami SVOP; poudarja, da ni sprejemljivo, da bi strukture SVOP uradno ali neuradno izvajale nadzor nad načrtovanjem in programiranjem ukrepov, ki se financirajo iz instrumenta za stabilnost, in vztraja pri tem, da se ne sme ukiniti premeščenih struktur Komisije;
Fully supports the transfer of the CSDP structures, including the Crisis Management Planning Directorate, the Civilian Planning and Conduct Capability, the EU Military Staff and the Situation Centre, to the EEAS, under the direct authority and responsibility of the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy; recalls the pledge made by the Vice-President/High Representative to ensure that they work in close cooperation and synergy with the relevant Commission units transferred to the EEAS which deal with the planning and programming of crisis response, conflict prevention and peace-building; urges the Vice-President/High Representative to ensure that these units work on an equal footing with the CSDP structures; stresses that no formal or informal control by the CSDP structures of the planning and programming of measures financed from the Instrument for Stability is acceptable and insists that the transferred Commission structures must not be dismantled;
zaradi razvoja celovitega pristopa EU spodbuja tudi tesno usklajevanje med ESZD in vsemi drugimi zadevnimi enotami Komisije, zlasti tistimi, ki se ukvarjajo z razvojem, humanitarno pomočjo, civilno zaščito in javnim zdravjem; poudarja potrebo po neposredni povezavi med ESZD in agencijami SVOP, in sicer Evropsko obrambno agencijo, Inštitutom EU za varnostne študije, Evropsko akademijo za varnost in obrambo ter Satelitskim centrom EU;
For the sake of the development of the EU's comprehensive approach, also encourages close coordination between the EEAS and all relevant units remaining within the Commission, in particular those dealing with development, humanitarian aid, civil protection and public health; stresses the need for direct links between the EEAS and CSDP agencies, namely the European Defence Agency, the EU Institute for Security Studies, the European Security and Defence College and the EU Satellite Centre;
spominja na vlogo centra Komisije za spremljanje in informiranje pri olajševanju usklajevanja pomoči pri elementarnih nesrečah v okviru mehanizma civilne zaščite in poudarja, da mora podpredsednica/visoka predstavnica v svoji vlogi podpredsednice Komisije zagotoviti tesno sodelovanje med centrom in ESZD; na podlagi izkušenj s Haitija in ob upoštevanju predvsem civilne narave operacij za reševanje ob elementarnih nesrečah poziva k večji usklajenosti in hitrejši razmestitvi vojaških virov v okviru pomoči pri elementarnih nesrečah, zlasti zmogljivosti letalskega prevoza; ponovno poziva k dodatnim izboljšavam mehanizma civilne zaščite, da bi vzpostavili prostovoljni sklad sredstev držav članic, ki bi ga imeli v pripravljenosti, v primeru operacij odzivanja na nesreče pa bi ga bilo mogoče nemudoma uporabiti; predlaga, da bi usklajevanje in uporaba potekali pod okriljem civilne zaščite EU, da bi povečali preglednost dejanj EU; obenem opozarja na individualno odgovornost držav članic za civilno zaščito in ukrepe nadzora nad elementarnimi nesrečami;
Draws attention to the role of the Commission's Monitoring and Information Centre (MIC) in facilitating disaster relief coordination under the Civil Protection Mechanism and highlights the need for close cooperation between the centre and the EEAS to be ensured by the Vice-President/High Representative in her capacity as Vice-President of the Commission; calls for improved coordination and faster deployment of military assets in the context of disaster relief, in particular air transport capabilities, based on the lessons learned in Haiti and while respecting the primarily civilian nature of disaster relief operations; reiterates its call for further improvement of the Civil Protection Mechanism to establish a voluntary pool of Member States' assets on stand-by for immediate deployment in disaster response operations; suggests that these assets be coordinated and deployed under the designation of an EU Civil Protection Force to increase the visibility of EU action; recalls at the same time the individual responsibility of the Member States for civil protection and disaster control measures;
zagovarja tudi boljše usklajevanje med človekoljubnimi organizacijami držav članic in GD ECHO pri izvajanju reševalnih akcij po naravnih nesrečah ali nesrečah, ki jih povzroči človek;
Advocates also improved coordination between the Member State humanitarian agencies and DG ECHO for relief operations following natural or man-made disasters;
poziva Svet, naj nemudoma sprejme potrebne sklepe za uveljavitev klavzule za vzajemno pomoč iz člena 42(7) PEU in solidarnostne klavzule iz člena 222 PDEU, ki bi odražali celostni pristop EU in gradili na civilno-vojaških virih;
Calls on the Council to promptly adopt the necessary decisions to give effect to the mutual assistance clause as outlined in Article 42(7) TEU as well as the solidarity clause as outlined in Article 222 TFEU, which should reflect the EU's comprehensive approach and build on civil-military resources;
opominja na uspešen razvoj partnerstva za vzpostavljanje miru med Komisijo in nevladnimi organizacijami ter opozarja, da je dobro sodelovanje med nevladnimi organizacijami, organizacijami civilne družbe in prihodnjo ESZD bistvenega pomena; poziva Komisijo, naj nadalje razvija okvir za sodelovanje z nevladnimi organizacijami ter spodbuja sodelovanje nedržavnih akterjev pri dejavnostih Unije za preprečevanje in obvladovanje konfliktov, tudi tako, da jih vključi v dejavnosti EU na področju usposabljanja;
Recalls the successful development of the Peace-building Partnership between the Commission and non-governmental organisations, and that good cooperation between non-governmental, civil-society organisations and the future EEAS is of crucial importance; calls on the Commission to further develop the framework for cooperation with NGOs and to promote the use of non-state actors in the Union's conflict prevention and conflict management activities, also by including them in EU training activities;
na politično-strateški ravni pozdravlja vključitev civilnih in vojaških elementov v direktorat za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje, saj gre za korak v pravi smeri; vseeno poudarja, da je treba doseči primerno ravnotežje med civilnimi in vojaškimi zmogljivostmi za strateško načrtovanje, ne le v smislu številk, pač pa tudi glede na hierarhijo, da se v celoti izkoristijo sinergije, ki so na voljo; hkrati poudarja, da je treba dosledno upoštevati razlike med civilnimi in vojaškimi vlogami ter njihovimi značilnimi cilji in zagotoviti, da bo vsaki operaciji od primera do primera dodeljena ustrezna mešanica človeških virov;
On the political-strategic level, welcomes the integration of civilian and military elements within the Crisis Management Planning Directorate (CMPD) as a step in the right direction; emphasises, however, the need to strike a proper balance between civilian and military strategic planning capabilities, not only in terms of numbers, but also with regard to hierarchy, in order to exploit to the full the synergies available; highlights at the same time the need to duly respect the differences between civilian and military roles and their distinctive objectives and to make sure that an appropriate mixture of human resources is allocated to each operation on a case-by-case basis;
zlasti poziva podpredsednico/visoko predstavnico, naj ukrepa v zvezi s pomanjkanjem osebja, kar zadeva strokovnjake o razvijanju civilnih zmogljivosti in načrtovanju misij, in naj zagotovi, da bo v direktoratu za krizno upravljanje in načrtovanje dovolj strokovnjakov z vseh prednostnih področij civilnih zmogljivosti, in sicer policije, pravosodja, civilne uprave, civilne zaščite in nadzora, pa tudi s področja človekovih pravic;
In particular, urges the Vice-President/High Representative to address the shortage of staff as regards experts on civilian mission planning and capability development and to make sure that the CMPD includes a sufficient number of experts from all the priority civilian capability areas, namely police, justice, civilian administration, civil protection and monitoring, as well as in the area of human rights;
poudarja, da je treba v običajnih razmerah vzpostaviti skupno zavedanje o razmerah pri vseh zainteresiranih straneh iz EU (ESZD, pa tudi pri vseh ustreznih enotah Komisije: GD DEV, GD ECHO, GD SANCO – s podporo vseh njihovih zmogljivosti za ocenjevanje krize), kar mora biti razvidno iz vseh regionalnih ali državnih strateških dokumentov EU; poudarja, da imajo preoblikovane delegacije EU bistveno vlogo v tem procesu;
Emphasises the need, in routine phases, to develop a common situation awareness shared by all EU stakeholders (EEAS, but also all relevant units from the Commission: DG DEV, DG ECHO, DG SANCO, with the support of each of their crisis assessment capabilities), which should be reflected in all EU regional or country strategic papers; stresses that the reshaped EU delegations have a key role to play in this process;
poziva, naj se – kadar so prisotni na kriznem področju – izboljša vloga vodij delegacij EU in/ali posebnih predstavnikov EU v prizadevanjih za civilno-vojaško usklajevanje, tudi z namenom zagotavljanja natančnejšega političnega nadzora na terenu;
Calls for an improved role for the Heads of EU Delegations and/or EU Special Representatives - when present in the area of crisis - in the civilian-military coordination efforts, also with a view to securing closer political oversight on the ground;