natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
2) Posebne pravice za zaposlene ter njihove izvoljene predstavniške organe in organizacije so zmanjšane na minimum.
2) The powers granted to workers and their elected representative bodies and organisations have been reduced to a bare minimum.
To je sicer pomembno, vendar pri tem niso omenjeni skupni organi ali sindikati.
However, no reference is made to either joint bodies or trade union organisations.
Zaposleni so le bežno omenjeni v členu 11, ki govori o načrtih ukrepov ob nesrečah.
Staff are only mentioned in a passing reference in Article 11 on emergency plans.
To pomanjkljivost je treba odpraviti vsaj iz dveh razlogov: zaposleni so najbolj izpostavljeni vprašanjem glede varnosti in dejansko poznajo delovanje naprav, ki bi lahko bile nevarne, kar je nujno za učinkovito politiko preprečevanja.
This oversight should be rectified for at least two reasons: staff are the group most concerned by safety issues and have ‘shop-floor’ knowledge of how potentially dangerous installations work – an indispensible element in any effective prevention policy.
3) V direktivi niso omenjena tveganja, povezana z oddajanjem naročil podizvajalcem .
3) The directive fails to mention any risks related to subcontracting .
Brez ponovnega navajanja vzrokov eksplozije v tovarni AZF Total v Toulousu, je treba izpostaviti, da direktiva sploh ne obravnava vprašanja učinkovitosti takšnih pogodbenih razmerij pri preprečevanju tveganj.
Without restating the underlying causes of the explosion at the AZF Total factory in Toulouse, it has to be said that the directive completely fails to address the question of the effectiveness of such contractual arrangements in preventing risks.
V členu 11(4) je omenjeno le posvetovanje z dolgoročno zaposlenim podizvajalskim osebjem pri izdelavi načrtov ukrepov ob nesrečah.
The only provisions it contains, in Article 11(4), concern the consultation of relevant long-term subcontracted personnel in drawing up emergency plans.
4) V osnutku besedila je omenjeno usklajevanje s pristojnimi organi , ni pa razloženo, kaj se zgodi na primer, če inšpektorat za delo izda poročilo, v katerem kritizira organizacijo dela ali pa sisteme za upravljanje varovanja?
4) The proposal for a directive does provide for coordination with the competent authorities , but what happens, for example, if the labour inspection authorities issue a report criticising working arrangements or security management systems?
Poleg tega ugotavljamo, da izredni in nadzorni ukrepi (kadrovski in finančni viri) niso zadosti poudarjeni.
Furthermore, insufficient reference is made to emergency and supervisory arrangements (both human and financial resources).
5) Nevarnost naravnih nesreč: nedavna nesreča v Fukušimi je jasno pokazala, da za zagotovitev varnosti naprav, zaposlenih in prebivalstva ne zadostuje zgolj upoštevanje tehnoloških tveganj, če se pri tem ne upoštevajo tudi vse vrste nevarnosti naravnih nesreč.
5) With regard to natural hazards: the recent catastrophic accident in Fukushima has categorically shown that systems to address technological risks are insufficient to ensure the safety of installations, workers and the population if they fail to take account of all kinds of natural hazards.
6) V prihodnji direktivi Seveso III je treba omeniti prevoz nevarnih snovi .
6) The future Seveso III Directive must include provisions on the transport of dangerous materials .
Ta prevoz je žal včasih namenjen zmanjšanju stalnih zalog v obratih Seveso, kar omogoča izogibanje varnostnim predpisom, povezanim z zgornjimi mejami zalog.
Dangerous materials are, unfortunately, sometimes transported to locations other than Seveso installations, in order to reduce the amount permanently stocked at such installations and therefore get round safety rules linked to storage thresholds.
Zato je treba nevarne snovi, ki se s tem namenom prevažajo, prišteti k stalnim zalogam in upoštevati pri izvajanju ustreznih predpisov.
For the purposes of the relevant regulations, dangerous materials removed from facilities in this way must therefore be included in the amount permanently stored there.
Ta ukrep bi prispeval k večji odgovornosti upravljavcev obratov in okrepitvi prometne varnosti.
Such a measure would encourage installation managers to act in a more responsible manner and help make our roads safer.
Zato je treba zagotoviti ohranjanje in po možnosti dodatno izboljšanje obstoječih ravni varstva.
There is therefore a need to ensure that existing high levels of protection are maintained and if possible further improved.
(2a) Podizvajalci so pogosto povzročitelji ali sopovzročitelji večjih nesreč.
(2a) Major accidents have often been caused by sub ‑contractors or have seen their involvement.
(4) Zato je primerno nadomestiti Direktivo 96/82/ES, da se z večjo uspešnostjo in učinkovitostjo določb zagotovita ohranitev in dodatno izboljšanje obstoječih ravni varstva, in da se, kjer je mogoče, zmanjša nepotrebna upravna obremenitev s poenostavitvijo ali uskladitvijo določb brez ogrožanja varnosti.
(4) It is therefore appropriate to replace Directive 96/82/EC to ensure that that existing levels of protection are maintained and further improved, by making the provisions more effective and efficient, and where possible reducing unnecessary administrative burdens by streamlining or simplification without compromising safety.
Hkrati morajo biti nove določbe jasne, skladne in lahko razumljive, da bi prispevale k izboljšanju izvajanja in izvršljivosti , raven varovanja zdravja ljudi in okolja pa mora biti enaka ali celo višja .
At the same time, the new provisions should be clear, coherent and easy to understand to help improve implementation and enforceability , and the level of health and environmental protection should be maintained or even increased .
Zato je treba uvesti in izvajati varnostne ukrepe in ukrepe za zmanjšanje tveganj, s katerimi bi preprečili morebitne nesreče, zmanjšali tveganje nesreč in ublažili morebitne posledice nastalih nesreč ter s tem omogočili zagotavljanje visoke ravni varstva v vsej Uniji.
It is therefore necessary to establish and apply safety and risk-reduction measures with a view to preventing possible accidents, reducing the risks of accidents occurring and minimising the effects if they do occur, thereby making it possible to ensure a high level of protection throughout the Union.
Države članice bi si morale prizadevati za izmenjavo najboljših praks.
The Member States should make every effort to exchange best practices.
Poleg tega mora upravljavec pripraviti in predložiti pristojnemu organu načrt ukrepov za preprečevanje večjih nesreč, v katerem navede podizvajalska podjetja in opredeli splošne pristope in ukrepe upravljavca, vključno z ustreznimi sistemi upravljanja varnosti za obvladovanje večjih nesreč.
The operator should also draw up and send to the competent authority a major-accident prevention policy setting out , besides the names of any sub ‑contractors, the operator's overall approach and measures, including appropriate safety management systems, for controlling major-accident hazards.
(11a) Upravljavci bi morali biti zmožni dokazati svojo zmogljivost obvladovanja posledic nesreče, v katero so vključene nevarne snovi, na primer s predložitvijo pogodbe o posebnem zavarovanju, sklenjene s podjetjem, za katerega je ugotovljeno, da je solventen, ali z ustreznim lastnim kapitalom.
(11a) Operators should be able to provide evidence that they would be able deal with the consequences of an accident involving dangerous substances, for example by demonstrating that they have taken out a specific insurance policy with a company of acknowledged solvency or that they have a sufficient level of equity.
To določbo bi bilo treba upoštevati, zato da stroškov posledic nesreče, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi, ne bi bilo treba kriti iz državnega proračuna, temveč bi bili vključeni kot del stroškov operaterja.
This is important in order to ensure that dealing with the consequences of an accident involving dangerous substances does not put a strain on the public purse and is included as part of an operator’s costs.
(12a) Za omejitev tveganja večjih nesreč in verižnega učinka je treba ustrezno upoštevati medsebojno vplivanje naravnih virov nevarnosti v povezavi z lokacijo podjetja ali obrata in virov nevarnosti v povezavi z uporabljenimi tehnologijami.
(12a) In order to reduce the risk of major accidents and of domino effects, due consideration should be given to the interaction between natural sources of danger associated with the location of the undertaking or facility and sources of danger associated with the technologies it uses.
(15) Za zagotovitev boljšega varstva bivalnih območij, območij za pretežno javno uporabo in okolja, vključno z območji posebnega pomena za ohranjanje narave ali posebej občutljivih območij, je treba pri rabi prostora in/ali pri drugih ustreznih politikah držav članic dolgoročno upoštevati potrebo po ohranjanju primerne razdalje med takšnimi območji in organizacijami, ki pomenijo navedene nevarnosti, ter v primeru obstoječih organizacij upoštevati dodatne tehnične ukrepe, da se ne povečajo tveganja za ljudi.
(15) In order to provide greater protection for residential areas, areas of substantial public use and the environment, including areas of particular natural interest or sensitivity, it is necessary for land-use or other relevant policies applied in the Member States to take account of the need, in the long term, to keep a suitable distance between such areas and establishments presenting such hazards and, where existing establishments are concerned, to take account of additional technical measures so that the risk to persons is not increased.
Za zmanjšanje upravne obremenitve , zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, je treba, kadar je to mogoče, postopke in ukrepe združiti s postopki in ukrepi v skladu z zakonodajo Unije na tem področju .
Where possible, to reduce administrative burdens , especially for small and medium-sized enterprises , procedures and measures should be integrated with those under other relevant Union legislation.
(19) Upravljavec mora za zagotovitev ustreznega odziva ob večji nesreči takoj obvestiti pristojne organe in jim sporočiti potrebne podatke, da lahko ocenijo vpliv take nesreče.
(19) In order to ensure that adequate response measures are taken if a major accident occurs, the operator should immediately inform the competent authorities and communicate the information necessary for them to assess the impact of that accident.
(19) Upravljavec mora za zagotovitev ustreznega odziva ob večji nesreči takoj obvestiti pristojne ter lokalne organe in jim sporočiti potrebne podatke, da lahko ocenijo vpliv take nesreče na zdravje ljudi, njihovo lastnino in okolje ter da se prepreči ponovni nastanek tovrstne nesreče .
(19) In order to ensure that adequate response measures are taken if a major accident occurs, the operator should immediately inform the competent authorities and local authorities and communicate the information necessary for them to assess the impact of that accident on people’s health, on their property and on the environment and to prevent such an accident from happening again .
(22a) Vsaki prilagoditvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1272/2008 tehničnemu napredku bi morala slediti ocena potrebe po prilagoditvi Priloge I tej direktivi.
(22a) Each adaptation of Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 to technical progress should be followed by an assessment of the need to adapt Annex I to this Directive.
S tem bi zagotovili funkcionalno povezavo med zakonodajnima aktoma in ohranjanje visoke stopnje varovanja človekovega zdravja in okolja.
This would establish a functional link between the two pieces of legislation and ensure that a high level of protection for human health and the environment is maintained.
(23) Za prilagoditev te direktive tehničnemu in znanstvenemu napredku bi morali Komisiji podeliti pristojnost za sprejemanje aktov v skladu s členom 290 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije v zvezi s spremembami Dela 3 Priloge I in prilog II do VI k tej direktivi.
(23) In order to adapt this Directive to technical and scientific progress, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to Part 3 of Annex I, and Annexes II to VI to this Directive.
Komisija bi morala pri pripravi in sestavi delegiranih aktov zagotoviti hkratno, hitro ter ustrezno posredovanje zadevnih dokumentov Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu.
The Commission, when preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and the Council.
Poleg tega se tako pojasni, da bi moralo biti z delegiranimi akti mogoče spreminjati Del 3 Priloge I (ki spreminja področje uporabe, vendar samo v posebnih okoliščinah) in prilog II do VI.
It furthermore clarifies that it should be possible to amend part 3 of Annex I (which changes the scope, but only for very specific situations) and the Annexes II to VI by delegated acts.
4. „nova organizacija“ pomeni organizacijo, ki je zgrajena na novo ali še ni začela obratovati;
4. ‘new establishment’ means an establishment that is newly constructed or has yet to enter into operation;
4. „nova organizacija“ pomeni organizacijo, ki začne obratovati po 31. maju 2015 ;
4. ‘new establishment’ means an establishment that enters into operation after 31 May 2015 ;
18a. „ustrezna varnostna razdalja“ pomeni najmanjšo razdaljo, na kateri v primeru večje nesreče ni mogoče zaslediti nikakršnih negativnih posledic za človeško zdravje ali okolje;
18a. “appropriate safety distance” means the minimum distance at which no possible negative effects can be registered on human health or the environment in the event of a major accident;
Člen 3 – točka 18 b (novo)
Article 3 – point 18 b (new)
18b. „verižni učinek“ pomeni možnost večje nesreče, do katere pride v organizaciji zaradi druge nesreče v bližnji okolici te organizacije, bodisi v drugi organizaciji ali na območju, ki ga ta direktiva ne zajema.
18b. “domino effect” means the possibility of a major accident occurring in an establishment caused by another accident in the vicinity of the establishment, either in another establishment or on a site that falls outside the scope of this Directive.
Kadar se na podlagi meril iz odstavka 4 tega člena dokaže, da posamezne snovi iz delov 1 ali 2 Priloge I ne pomenijo nevarnosti večje nesreče , zlasti zaradi njihove fizikalne oblike, lastnosti, razvrstitve, koncentracije ali običajnega pakiranja, lahko Komisija z delegiranimi akti navede te snovi v delu 3 Priloge I v skladu s členom 24 .
Where it is demonstrated, on the basis of the criteria referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article , that particular substances covered by Parts 1 or 2 of Annex I are incapable of creating a major accident hazard, in particular due to their physical form, properties, classification, concentration or generic packaging, the Commission may list those substances in Part 3 of Annex I by delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 .
Kadar se na podlagi meril iz Priloge VII k tej direktivi dokaže, da posamezne snovi ali zmesi iz delov 1 ali 2 Priloge I pod posebnimi pogoji ne pomenijo nevarnosti večje nesreče zaradi njihove fizikalne oblike, lastnosti, razvrstitve, koncentracije ali običajnega pakiranja, in bi zato zanje veljalo odstopanje, lahko Komisija sprejme delegirane akte v skladu s členom 24, v katerih navede te snovi in zmesi skupaj z veljavnimi pogoji iz dela 3 Priloge I.
Where it is demonstrated, on the basis of the criteria set out in Annex VII to this Directive , that particular substances or mixtures covered by Parts 1 or 2 of Annex I are , under specific conditions, incapable of creating a major accident hazard, due to their physical form, properties, classification, concentration or generic packaging, and should thus benefit from a derogation, the Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 in order to list those substances and mixtures together with the applicable conditions in Part 3 of Annex I.
Pojasniti bi bilo treba, da namen odstavka 1 ni popolna izključitev snovi in zmesi iz področja uporabe ampak samo v primerih, ko snovi in zmesi pod jasno opredeljenimi pogoji ne pomenijo nevarnosti večje nesreče zaradi njihove fizikalne oblike, lastnosti, razvrstitve, koncentracije ali običajnega pakiranja.
It should be clarified that paragraph 1 is not meant to completely exclude substances and mixtures from the scope, but that it is meant for those cases where substances and mixtures are under clearly specified conditions incapable of creating a major accident hazard, due to their physical form, properties, classification, concentration or generic packaging.
Za snovi in zmesi velja odstopanje samo, če so izpolnjeni pogoji, določeni v delu 3 Priloge I.
The substances and mixtures are only subject to derogation as far as the conditions as specified in Annex I Part 3 are met.
Ker bo to zadevalo samo zelo posebne primere, je sprejemljiva uporaba delegiranih aktov.
As this will concern very specific situations, it would be acceptable to use delegated acts.
Kadar se na podlagi meril iz odstavka 4 tega člena pristojnemu organu zadovoljivo dokaže, da posamezne snovi, ki so prisotne v posamezni organizaciji ali katerem od njenih delov in so navedene v delih 1 ali 2 Priloge I, ne pomenijo nevarnosti večje nesreče zaradi posebnih pogojev v organizaciji , kot so vrsta pakiranja in zadrževanje snovi ali zadevna lokacija in količine , se lahko država članica pristojnega organa odloči, da zadevni organizaciji ni treba izpolnjevati zahtev iz členov 7 do 19 .
Where it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of a competent authority, on the basis of the criteria referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article , that particular substances present at an individual establishment or any part thereof and listed in Parts 1 or 2 of Annex I are incapable of creating a major accident hazard, due to the specific conditions pertaining in the establishment such as the nature of the packaging and containment of the substance or the location and quantities involved, the Member State of the competent authority may decide not to apply the requirements set out in Articles 7 to 19 of this Directive to the establishment concerned.
Kadar se na podlagi meril iz Priloge VII dokaže, da posamezne snovi, ki so prisotne v posamezni organizaciji ali katerem od njenih delov in so navedene v delih 1 ali 2 Priloge I, ne pomenijo nevarnosti večje nesreče zaradi posebnih pogojev v organizaciji v zvezi z vrsto pakiranja in zadrževanjem snovi ali zadevno lokacijo in količinami , se lahko pristojni organ države članice brez poseganja v odstavek 1 odloči, da zadevni organizaciji ni treba izpolnjevati zahtev iz členov 9, 10(b), 11 in 13(2) te direktive .
Without prejudice to paragraph 1, where it is demonstrated , on the basis of the criteria referred to in Annex VII , that particular substances present at an individual establishment or any part thereof and listed in Parts 1 or 2 of Annex I are incapable of creating a major accident hazard, due to the specific conditions pertaining in the establishment regarding the nature of the packaging and containment of the substance or the location and quantities involved, the competent authority of the Member State concerned may decide not to apply the requirements set out in Article 9, point (b) of Article 10, Article 11 and Article 13(2) of this Directive to the establishment concerned.
Medtem ko odstavek 1 omogoča odstopanja na ravni EU za nekatere snovi in samo v posebnih okoliščinah, pa člen 4(3) omogoča, da pristojni organ države članice odobri odstopanja na ravni posamezne organizacije.
While paragraph 1 allows for derogations at EU level for specific substances and only under specific circumstances, Article 4.3 allows the competent authority of the Member State to authorize derogations at the level of individual establishments.
Ker se ne bi smela zmanjšati raven varstva, se predlaga, da se v vseh primerih ohranijo vsaj zahteve za organizacije nižje stopnje in se odstopanja dovolijo samo za informacijske zahteve za organizacije višje stopnje.
As the level of protection should not decrease, it is proposed to maintain in all cases at least the lower-tier requirements and to only allow for derogations for the information requirements for upper-tier establishments.
Komisija redno posreduje sezname iz drugega pododstavka tega odstavka v vednost forumu iz člena 17(2).
The Commission shall regularly forward the lists referred to in the second subparagraph of this paragraph to the forum referred to in Article 17(2) for information.
Merila iz Priloge VII predstavljajo bistveni del te direktive, saj določajo področje odstopanj iz členov 4(1) in 4(3).
As the criteria in Annex VII define the scope of the derogations in Article 4.1 and 4.3 they form an essential part of this Directive.
Ta predlog spremembe k Prilogi VII vključuje veljavna merila, kakor so opredeljena z Odločbo Komisije 98/433/ES z dne 26. junija 1998.
The proposed amendment to Annex VII includes the existing criteria as specified in Commission decision 98/433/EC of 26 June 2008.
Komisija lahko po potrebi navede snovi iz prvega pododstavka tega odstavka v delu 1 ali delu 2 Priloge I z delegiranimi akti v skladu s členom 24 .
Where appropriate, the Commission may list the substances referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in Part 1 or Part 2 of Annex I by delegated acts in accordance with Article 24 .
Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predloži zakonodajni predlog, če meni, da bi morala biti nevarna snov, ki ni na seznamu in ki je izzvala ukrep iz prvega pododstavka tega odstavka , na seznamu v delu 1 ali 2 Priloge I .
In the event that the Commission considers that the non-listed dangerous substance which has prompted a measure as referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph should be listed in Part 1 or Part 2 of Annex I , it shall present a legislative proposal to that effect to the European Parliament and to the Council .
V nasprotju z odstavkom 1, ki zadeva zelo specifične dobro opredeljene primere, lahko dodajanje snovi v del 1 ali 2 povzroči bistveno razširitev področja uporabe, kar lahko zelo vpliva na gospodarstvo.
Contrary to paragraph 1, where it concerns very specific well defined cases, the addition of substances to Part 1 or 2 could result in a substantial extension of the scope, with potentially large economic impacts.
Države članice bodo lahko po potrebi kljub temu ukrepale, saj bodo lahko sprejele ustrezne ukrepe, če bodo menile, da nevarna snov predstavlja nevarnost večje nesreče.
As Member States may take appropriate measures if they consider that a dangerous substance presents a major-accident hazard, they will be able to act anyhow if necessary.
Komisija bo obvestila druge države članice.
The Commission will notify the other Member States.
Spreminjanje področja uporabe za celotno EU pa bi se moralo posledično izvajati po rednem zakonodajnem postopku.
Changing the scope for the EU as a whole should however subsequently take place trough the ordinary legislative procedure.
(aa) ime, trgovsko ime in naslov podizvajalskih podjetij;
(aa) the name, trade name and address of any sub ‑contractors;
(ga) certifikat vodstva organizacije, ki potrjuje, da bi bil operater zmožen obvladovati posledice nesreče, v katere so vključene nevarne snovi.
(ga) a certificate from the management of the establishment to the effect that the operator would be able to deal with the consequences of an accident involving dangerous substances.
(a) za nove organizacije najmanj šest mesecev pred začetkom gradnje ali obratovanja;
(a) for new establishments, at least six months prior to the start of construction or operation,
Tukaj gre za pojasnitev zakonodajnega besedila.
Clarity of the legislative text.
Vključuje splošne cilje in načela ukrepanja upravljavca , vlogo in odgovornost upravljanja ter obravnava varnostno kulturo ob upoštevanju nadzora nad nevarnostmi večjih nesreč.
It shall include the operator's overall aims and principles of action , the role and responsibility of management and shall address safety culture with respect to the control of major-accident hazards.