natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so sodelovanju Švice v sporazumu EGP nasprotovali njeni državljani na referendumu leta 1992 ter zato odnose med Švico in EU trenutno ureja več kot 120 dvostranskih in sektorskih sporazumov, ki zagotavljajo visoko stopnjo povezanosti, ne pa polnega sodelovanja na notranjem trgu,
whereas Switzerland's participation in the EEA agreement was contested by a popular vote in 1992 and therefore relations between Switzerland and the EU are currently based on more than 120 bilateral and sectoral agreements that provide for a far-reaching degree of integration but not full participation in the internal market,
meni, da je sporazum EGP ključno gonilo gospodarske rasti; pozdravlja splošno dobre rezultate držav EGP/Efte pri izvajanju zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga, ki jih izkazuje pregled notranjega trga; ugotavlja, da odnosi med EU in Švico pomenijo veliko več izzivov pri izvajanju sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb;
Considers the EEA agreement as a key driver for economic growth; welcomes the overall good track record of the EEA EFTA States in implementing internal market legislation, as demonstrated by the EEA EFTA States Internal Market Scoreboard; notes that relations between the EU and Switzerland pose far more challenges as far as the implementation of the Free Movement of Persons Agreement (FMPA) is concerned;
Izvajanje predpisov na področju notranjega trga: države EGP/Efte
Implementation of internal market rules: EEA EFTA countries
pozdravlja vključitev izboljšanih podatkov o državah EGP/Efte v letni pregled potrošniških trgov; spodbuja nadzorni organ Efte, naj s pomočjo Komisije in v sodelovanju z njo nadalje razvije sistematično spremljanje izvajanja zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga;
Welcomes the inclusion of improved data on the EEA EFTA countries in the annual Consumer Markets scoreboard; encourages the EFTA Surveillance Authority, with the assistance of, and in cooperation with, the Commission, to develop further the systematic monitoring of the implementation of internal market legislation;
ugotavlja, da se je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe pojavila negotovost, katera zakonodaja je veljavna za EGP; meni, da bi to lahko povzročilo počasnejše izvajanje zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga v državah EGP/Efte; poziva Komisijo, naj poda oceno stanja;
Notes that with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty uncertainty exists as to which EU legislation is EEA relevant; considers that this might lead to slower implementation of the internal market legislation in the EEA EFTA States; urges the Commission to provide an assessment of the situation;
ugotavlja, da Lizbonska pogodba povečuje vlogo nacionalnih parlamentov v odločanju v EU; meni, da bi podobno tudi parlamenti držav EGP/Efte morali biti tesneje povezani z zakonodajnimi postopki EU pri predlogih, ki veljajo za EGP; poziva Komisijo, naj nacionalnim parlamentom držav EGP/Efte z namenom posvetovanja pošilja zakonodajne predloge, ki jih pošilja nacionalnim parlamentom držav članic EU;
Notes that the Lisbon Treaty enhances the role of national parliaments in EU decision-making; considers that, by analogy, parliaments in the EEA EFTA States should be more closely associated with the EU legislative process as regards EEA-relevant proposals; calls on the Commission to provide the national parliaments of the EEA EFTA States with the legislative proposals that are sent to the national parliaments in the EU Member States for consultation;
poziva Komisijo, naj formalizira postopek priglasitve novih predpisov in zakonodaje EU, ki sodijo v področje sporazuma EGP, ter tako skrajša obdobje med sprejemom nove zakonodaje in njenim morebitnim prevzemom v državah EGP/Efte;
Calls on the Commission to formalise the notification process of new EU rules and legislation that fall within the scope of the EEA Agreement in order to decrease the gap between the adoption of new legislation and potential take-up by EEA EFTA States;
spodbuja države EGP/Efte, da dodelijo ustrezna sredstva za izvajanje zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga; meni, da je v zvezi s tem bistveno izvajanje direktive o storitvah, zlasti pa vzpostavitev enotnih kontaktnih točk;
Encourages the EEA EFTA States to allocate adequate resources for implementing internal market legislation; considers the implementation of the Services Directive and in particular the setting-up of single points of contact to be of crucial importance in this connection;
priznava, da uveljavljanje zakonodaje zaradi institucionalnih razlogov nujno poteka počasneje v državah EGP/Efte kot v EU; ugotavlja, da so kljub različnim razmeram in v glavnem pozitivnim rezultatom še možnosti za nadaljnje odpravljanje pomanjkljivega izvajanja tudi v državah EGP/Efte;
Recognises that, for institutional reasons, the implementation of internal market legislation is necessarily proceeding more slowly in EEA EFTA countries than in the EU; notes that, despite these differing conditions and the broadly positive results, there is still potential for further reducing the implementation deficit in the EEA EFTA States as well;
ugotavlja, da so trenutno v razpravi drugi pomembni predlogi zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga, vključno s predlogom direktive o pravicah potrošnikov, ki ga je pripravila Komisija; poziva Komisijo, naj poveča vključenost držav članic EGP/Efte v te razprave;
Notes that other important Internal Market legislation proposals are currently under discussion, including the Commission's proposal for a Directive on Consumer Rights; calls on the Commission to increase the involvement of EEA EFTA Member States in those discussions;
pozdravlja napredek na poti k liberalizaciji čezmejnega opravljanja storitev med EU in Švico in zlasti pozitivne učinke sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb, o katerih priča stalno naraščanje števila napotenih delavcev in samozaposlenih ponudnikov storitev iz EU, ki delujejo v Švici, med letoma 2005 in 2009; ugotavlja, da je tak trend koristen za obe strani;
Welcomes the progress made towards liberalisation of cross-border service provision between the EU and Switzerland and, in particular, the positive effects of the FMPA, as witnessed by constant increases in the numbers of posted workers and self-employed service providers from the EU operating in Switzerland from 2005 to 2009; notes that this trend has been mutually beneficial;
ugotavlja, da je Švica sprejela številne podporne ukrepe, ki spremljajo sporazum o prostem pretoku oseb in so namenjeni zaščiti delavcev pred plačnim in socialnim dampingom, zagotavljanju enake obravnave ponudnikov storitev iz Švice in EU ter zagotavljanju javne podpore za sporazum; ugotavlja, da bi ti ukrepi lahko ovirali opravljanje storitev podjetij iz EU, zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij, v Švici; ugotavlja, da bi bili v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije mnogi izmed teh podpornih ukrepov sprejemljivi le, če sorazmerno ščitijo splošni interes, ki ni zaščiten že v matični državi ponudnikov storitev;
Notes that Switzerland has adopted a number of supporting measures accompanying the FMPA aimed at protecting workers against wage and social dumping, providing equal treatment for Swiss and EU services providers and safeguarding public support for the agreement; observes that these measures can hinder the provision of services by EU businesses, notably by small and medium-sized businesses in Switzerland; notes that according to Court of Justice case-law a number of these supporting measures would be acceptable only if they protect, in a proportional manner, a general interest that is not already protected in the state of origin of the service providers;
poudarja, da so zlasti naslednji podporni ukrepi nesorazmerni, kar zadeva sporazum o prostem gibanju, in otežujejo malim in srednjim podjetjem opravljanje storitev v Švici; obveznost zagotavljanja predhodnega obvestila z osemdnevno čakalno dobo, zahteva o prispevku za stroške delovanja tristranskih komisij ter prestrogo izvrševanje; v zvezi s tem tudi poziva švicarske organe, naj razveljavijo predpise, ki tuja podjetja, ki zagotavljajo čezmejne storitve, obvezujejo k vložitvi jamstva o finančni integriteti;
Points out that the following supporting measures in particular are disproportionate as regards the agreement on freedom of movement and make it difficult for SMEs to provide services in Switzerland: the obligation in force in Switzerland to provide prior notification with an 8-day waiting period, the requirement to contribute to the enforcement costs of tripartite commissions, and excessively strict enforcement; in this context, also urges the Swiss authorities to repeal regulations which oblige foreign enterprises providing cross-border services to place a guarantee of financial probity;
je zaskrbljen zaradi nedavnega razvoja dogodkov na letališču Zürich-Kloten, ko švicarski organi nemškim in avstrijskim taksijem niso dovolili sprejeti potnikov, ter globoko dvomi, da je ta ukrep v skladu s sporazumom o prostem pretoku oseb; poziva Komisijo, naj to vprašanje natančno preuči;
Is concerned about the recent developments at Zürich-Kloten Airport where the Swiss authorities refused to allow German and Austrian taxis to take passengers, and expresses serious doubts as to whether this measure complies with the FMPA; urges the Commission to examine this issue thoroughly;
poziva Komisijo, naj preuči ukrepe, ki ovirajo delovanje notranjega trga v EU in povzročajo težave švicarskim ponudnikom storitev, ter po potrebi ukrepa;
Calls on the Commission to examine measures obstructing the functioning of the internal market within the EU which also pose problems for Swiss service providers, and to take measures, if appropriate;
spodbuja švicarsko vlado in kantone, naj si pomagajo z izkušnjami EU in EGP o odpiranju sektorja storitev prek izvajanja direktive o storitvah; poudarja, da direktiva o storitvah v gospodarskem pogledu kaže učinek liberalizacije ne samo med državami članicami, temveč tudi znotraj njih, prek postopka pregledovanja nacionalne zakonodaje za zmanjšanje nepotrebnih ovir za ustanavljanje in medsebojni pregled, s čimer države članice opravičujejo vse nadaljnje omejitve v javnem interesu; zato meni, da bi podobno izvajanje utegnilo biti v pomoč pri utiranju poti za bolje zagotavljanje čezmejnih storitev med EU in Švico;
Encourages the Swiss Government, and the Cantons, to draw on the EU and EEA's experiences of opening up the services sector through the implementation of the Services Directive; emphasises that, in economic terms, the Services Directive is proving to have a liberalisation affect not only across but also within Member States, through the process of screening national legislation to remove unnecessary barriers to establishment, and peer review, whereby Member States have been justifying any further restrictions in the public interest; considers therefore that a similar exercise might prove helpful in paving the way for increased cross-border service provision between the EU and Switzerland;
pozdravlja prizadevanja švicarske vlade za boljšo dostopnost informacij podjetjem iz EU;
Welcomes the efforts made by the Swiss government to improve the availability of information for businesses from the EU;
pozdravlja odločitev švicarskega parlamenta, da prenese Direktivo 2005/36/ES o priznavanju poklicnih kvalifikacij, ter poziva Švico in Komisijo, naj čim prej dosežeta sporazum o izvajanju direktive;
Welcomes the Swiss Parliament's decision to transpose Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and calls on Switzerland and the Commission to reach an agreement on the implementation of the Directive as soon as possible;
ugotavlja, da sporazum o prostem pretoku oseb v splošnem ne obsega celovitega sporazuma o prostem pretoku storitev in je ta zajet v posebnih dvostranskih sporazumih le v omejenem obsegu; poudarja, da bo splošni sporazum o prostem pretoku storitev prinesel znatne gospodarske koristi za obe strani; zato poziva Komisijo in Švico, naj preučita možnosti za začetek pogajanj z namenom sklenitve sporazuma, ki bi zajemal tako prost pretok oseb kot tudi storitev;
Observes that in general the FMPA does not contain a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services, with the latter only being very selectively covered by specific bilateral agreements; stresses that a comprehensive agreement on the free movement of services would bring significant economic benefits for both sides; calls on the Commission and Switzerland, therefore, to explore the possibility of launching negotiations with the aim of concluding an all-encompassing agreement on the free movement of services;
ob polnem spoštovanju razlogov za posebno naravo odnosov med Švico in EU meni, da bi si bilo treba na vse načine prizadevati, da bi se enaki ali vzporedni predpisi na področju notranjega trga – med drugim na področju prostega pretoka storitev – v EU in Švici razlagali in uporabljali na enak način, da bi tako zagotovili enakopravno sodelovanje Švice na notranjem trgu;
While fully respecting the causes of the specific nature of the relations between Switzerland and the EU, considers that every effort should be made so that identical or parallel internal market rules, inter alia in the area of free movement of services, are interpreted and applied in the same manner in the EU and Switzerland, in order to ensure Switzerland's equal participation in the internal market;
poudarja obojestranski interes EU in Švice za večjo enotnost pri uporabi sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb ter hitrejše zbliževanje zakonodaje na področju notranjega trga v Švici in EU, ki bi gospodarskim subjektom na obeh straneh zagotovila preglednejše in predvidljivejše okolje;
Stresses the mutual interest of the EU and Switzerland in enhanced uniformity in the application of the FMPA and a more timely convergence of Swiss and EU internal market legislation which would provide economic operators from both sides with a more transparent and predictable environment;
pozdravlja neodvisni trend švicarskih organov, da upoštevajo sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije po podpisu sporazuma o prostem pretoku oseb; pozdravlja nedavni sprejem švicarske zakonodaje, ki upošteva načelo iz zadeve „Cassis de Dijon“;
Welcomes the independent trend for Swiss authorities to consider EU Court of Justice case-law that has been handed down after the signing of the FMPA; welcomes the recent adoption of the Swiss legislation to take into account the Cassis de Dijon principle;
spodbuja Komisijo in Švico, naj nemudoma dosežeta dogovor v potekajočih pogajanjih o dvostranskih sporazumih, tudi v sporazumu o varnosti proizvodov; poziva Komisijo in Švico, naj sestavita tega in prihodnje sporazume kolikor je mogoče jasno, pri tem pa upoštevata možnosti prihodnjega razvoja, tako da bodo možnosti neenakega izvajanja že od začetka strogo omejene;
Encourages the Commission and Switzerland to reach a prompt understanding in the ongoing negotiations on bilateral agreements, including the one on product safety; calls on the Commission and Switzerland to formulate these and future agreements as clearly as possible, taking account of future developments, so that the possibilities for uneven application are strictly limited from the outset;
poziva Komisijo in Švico, naj v kratkem roku poskusita poiskati horizontalne rešitve nekaterih institucionalnih težav, tako da bi se zmanjšala razdrobljenost in povečala preglednost v sistemu odločanja, izboljšala komunikacija med skupnimi odbori, ter pretehtata uvedbo učinkovitega mehanizma reševanja sporov;
Calls on the Commission and Switzerland in the short run to look into ways of finding horizontal solutions to certain institutional issues, to decrease fragmentation and enhance transparency in the decision-making system, to enhance communication between the Joint Committees and to consider the introduction of an effective dispute settlement mechanism;
poziva k izboljšanju komunikacije med Evropskim parlamentom in Švico ter k vključitvi predstavnikov Švice v delo Evropskega parlamenta in njegovih ustreznih organov;
Calls for enhanced communication between the European Parliament and Switzerland and for Swiss representatives to be more involved in the work of the European Parliament and its respective bodies;
Predlog uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju dvostranske zaščitne klavzule sporazuma o prosti trgovini med EU in Korejo ( KOM(2010)0049 – C7-0025/2010 – 2010/0032(COD) )
Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement ( COM(2010)0049 – C7-0025/2010 – 2010/0032(COD) )
Predlog je bil 7. septembra 2010 spremenjen kot sledi Zadeva je bila v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 57(2) vrnjena v odbor ( A7-0210/2010 ).
The proposal was amended on 7 September 2010 as follows The matter was then referred back to committee pursuant to Rule 57(2), second subparagraph ( A7-0210/2010 ).
Trgovinske ovire na domačem trgu trgovinske partnerice so v podporo izvozu iz tega trga na tuje, in kadar je ta izvoz namenjen v EU, bi lahko te ovire ustvarile pogoje za uporabo zaščitne klavzule.
Trade barriers in the home market of a trading partner tend to support exports from that market abroad and if it is to the EU they might thereby generate conditions for the application of the safeguard clause.
Poglavja 3 Sporazuma lahko uporabijo le, kadar se zadevni izdelek uvaža v Unijo v tako povečanem obsegu, in pod takimi pogoji, da povzroča
Chapter 3 of the Agreement;
Zaščitni ukrepi se v skladu s
or the economic activity in question is increased in such a measure,
členom 3.1
as laid down in Article 3.1.
Poglavja 3 Sporazuma lahko uporabijo le, kadar se zadevni izdelek uvaža v Unijo v tako povečanem obsegu
Chapter 3 of the Agreement;
Neizpolnjevanje specifičnih zahtev iz člena 13 Sporazuma – zlasti v zvezi s socialnimi in okoljskimi standardi, ki jih določa – lahko prav tako povzroči resno škodo ali nevarnost resne škode za proizvajalce Unije, ter tako zahteva sprejetje zaščitnih ukrepov.
Serious injury or the threat of serious injury to Union producers may also be caused by the non-fulfilment of specific obligations under Chapter 13 of the Agreement – particularly in respect of the social and environmental standards laid down therein – thus necessitating the imposition of safeguard measures.
Resna škoda ali nevarnost resne škode za proizvajalce ali posamezne sektorje gospodarstva Unije je odvisna tudi od spoštovanja predpisov o netarifnih trgovinskih ovirah iz Sporazuma.
Whether there is serious injury or the threat of serious injury to producers or specific sectors of the economy in the Union also depends on whether the Agreement's rules on non-tariff barriers to trade are observed.
Naloge v zvezi s spremljanjem in pregledom Sporazuma ter po potrebi sprejetje zaščitnih ukrepov bi bilo treba izpeljati na kar najbolj pregleden način in z udeležbo civilne družbe.
The tasks of following up and reviewing the Agreement and, if necessary, imposing safeguard measures should be carried out in the most transparent manner possible and with the involvement of civil society.
Komisija bi morala enkrat letno predložiti poročilo o uporabi in izvajanju Sporazuma ter o uporabi zaščitnih ukrepov.
The Commission should submit a report once a year on the application and implementation of the Agreement and the application of the safeguard measures.
Zanesljivost statističnih podatkov o vsem uvozu iz Republike Koreje v EU je tako ključna za ugotavljanje obstoja nevarnosti resne škode za celotno industrijo Unije ali njene različne sektorje vse od začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma.
The reliability of statistics on all imports from Republic of Korea to the EU is therefore crucial to determine the existence of a threat of serious injury to Union industry as a whole or its different sectors from the day of entry into force of the Agreement.
Pozorno spremljanje in redna ocenjevanja bodo olajšala in skrajšala začetek postopkov in fazo preiskovanja.
Close monitoring and regular assessments will facilitate and shorten the initiation of proceedings and the investigation phase.
Zato bi Komisija morala redno spremljati statistične podatke o uvozu in izvozu in ocenjevati vpliv Sporazuma na različne sektorje od dneva začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma.
Therefore the Commission should regularly monitor import and export statistics and assess the impact of the Agreement on different sectors from the day of its entry into force.
Komisija, države članice in proizvajalci Unije bi morali od dneva začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma stalno spremljati in ocenjevati statistične podatke o občutljivih proizvodnih linijah, ki jih zajema, da bo mogoče pravočasno ugotoviti vsako resno škodo ali nevarnost resne škode za proizvajalce Unije.
The Commission, the Member States and the Union producers should monitor and evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the import and export statistics on sensitive product lines covered by the Agreement from the day that it comes into force, so that any serious injury or threat of serious injury to Union producers can be identified in good time.
Treba je določiti nekatere postopke v zvezi z uporabo člena 14 (povračilo ali oprostitev carinskih dajatev) Protokola o opredelitvi „izdelkov s poreklom“ in o načinih upravnega sodelovanja v Sporazumu (v nadaljevanju „protokol o pravilih o poreklu“), da bi zagotovili učinkovito delovanje mehanizmov, predvidenih v tem protokolu, ter celovito izmenjavo informacij z zainteresiranimi stranmi.
It is necessary to lay down certain procedures relating to the application of Article 14 (Drawback of, or exemption from, customs duties) of the Protocol concerning the definition of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative co-operation of the Agreement (hereinafter the ‘Rules of Origin Protocol’) in order to ensure the effective operation of the mechanisms provided for therein and to provide for a comprehensive exchange of information with relevant stakeholders.
Ker bo šele pet let po začetku veljavnosti Sporazuma mogoče omejiti povračilo carinskih dajatev, bi bilo lahko na podlagi te Uredbe treba sprejeti zaščitne ukrepe v odziv na resno škodo ali nevarnost resne škode za proizvajalce Unije zaradi povračila ali oprostitve dajatev.
Because it will not be possible to limit customs duty drawback until five years after the Agreement comes into force, it may be necessary, on the basis of this Regulation, to impose safeguard measures in response to a serious injury or threat of serious injury to Union producers that is caused by duty drawback or exemption from duty.
Zato bi morala Komisija od dneva začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma posebej pozorno spremljati stopnjo vsebnosti komponent ali materialov iz tretjih držav v proizvodih, uvoženih iz Republike Koreje, vse spremembe v tej stopnji in vpliv takšnih sprememb na stanje na trgu, zlasti v občutljivih sektorjih.
Therefore, from the day of the Agreement's entry into force, the Commission should monitor particularly closely, in particular in sensitive sectors, the rate of inclusion in products imported from the Republic of Korea of components or materials from third countries, any changes in that rate and the impact of such changes on the market situation.
Zato bi morala Komisija od dneva začetka veljavnosti Sporazuma spremljati statistične podatke za Korejo in tretje strani ter navesti vrsto izdelkov, na katere bi lahko vplivalo povračilo dajatev.
Therefore the Commission should monitor Korean and third party statistics and list the range of products potentially affected by duty drawback from the day of entry into force of the Agreement.
Če preiskava Komisije ugotovi, da je bila zaradi Sporazuma povzročena škoda industriji Unije, se zgolj za namene Uredbe (ES) št. 1927/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. decembra 2006 o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za prilagoditev globalizaciji
If a Commission's investigation concludes that damage occurred in the Union's industry as a result of the Agreement, then only for the purposes of the Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
(„uredba ESPG“) šteje, da:
(‘EGAF Regulation’), it shall be understood that: