natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Avstralijo o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) Evropske unije s strani letalskih prevoznikov avstralski carinski službi ( 2008/2187(INI) )
European Parliament recommendation of 22 October 2008 to the Council concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of European Union-sourced passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian customs service ( 2008/2187(INI) )
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Sophie in't Veld v imenu skupine ALDE Svetu o sporazumu med Evropsko unijo in Avstralijo o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov iz podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) Evropske unije s strani letalskih prevoznikov avstralski Carinski službi ( B6-0383/2008 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by Sophia in't Veld on behalf of the ALDE Group on the Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of European Union-sourced passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian customs service ( B6-0383/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 2, 6, 24, 29 in 38 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, ki so pravna podlaga za evropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice in za mednarodna pogajanja s tretjimi državami in organizacijami o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah,
having regard to Articles 2, 6, 24, 29 and 38 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) which are the legal foundation for a European area of freedom, security and justice and for international negotiations with third countries and organisations as far as police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters are concerned,
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2008/651/SVZP/PNZ z dne 30. junija 2008 o podpisu Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Avstralijo o obdelavi in posredovanju podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) Evropske unije s strani letalskih prevoznikov avstralski Carinski službi v imenu Evropske unije UL L 213, 8.8.2008, str.
having regard to Council Decision 2008/651/CFSP/JHA of 30 June 2008 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and Australia on the processing and transfer of European Union-sourced passenger name record (PNR) data by air carriers to the Australian Customs Service OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p.
, ter ob upoštevanju samega Sporazuma,
and to the Agreement itself,
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je skladno s členom 25 Pogodbe EU navedeni sporazum sedaj začasno zavezujoč le za tiste države članice, ki niso dale izjave, da morajo ravnati v skladu z lastnimi notranjepravnimi postopki, kot so to storile Belgija, Češka republika, Nemčija, Irska, Latvija, Madžarska, Malta, Nizozemska, Poljska in Finska Nekatere države članice so sprejele posebne izjave, ki so objavljene v zapisniku Sveta in dostopne na naslednjem naslovu: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st10/st10439.en08.pdf
having regard to the fact that according to TEU Article 24(5), that Agreement is currently binding on a provisional basis only on those Member States which did not issue statements to the effect that they had to comply with their own constitutional procedure, as did Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Ireland, Latvia, Hungary, Malta, the Netherlands, Poland and Finland Some of the Member States adopted specific declarations published in the Council Minutes and accessible at the following address: http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/08/st10/st10439.en08.pdf
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bi se zaradi pravne podlage, izbrane za zgoraj omenjeni Sklep Sveta, namreč člena 38 in 24 Pogodbe EU (slednji se nanaša na zunanje odnose), s členom 21 Pogodbe EU zahtevalo, da se predsedstvo posvetuje s Parlamentom v zvezi z glavnimi vidiki in temeljnimi odločitvami skupne zunanje in varnostne politike,
having regard to the fact that, in view of the legal base chosen for the above-mentioned Council Decision, namely TEU Articles 38 and 24 (the latter of which refers to external relations), TEU Article 21 would require the Presidency to consult Parliament on the main aspects and the basic choices of the common foreign and security policy,
665), priporočilo Svetu z dne 7. septembra 2006 o pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazuma z Združenimi državami Amerike o uporabi evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) za boj proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ter za njihovo preprečevanje (UL C 305 E, 14.12.2006, str.
665), recommendation of 7 September 2006 to the Council on the negotiations for an agreement with the United States of America on the use of passenger name records (PNR) data to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime (OJ C 305 E, 14.12.2006, p.
250), in stališče Parlamenta z dne 7. julija 2005 o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in vlado Kanade o obdelavi izpopolnjenih informacij o potnikih (API)/podatkov iz evidence imen letalskih potnikov (PNR) (OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
250) and position of 7 July 2005 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Canada on the processing of Advance Passenger Information (API)/Passenger Name Record (PNR) data (OJ C 157 E, 6.7.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 8(2) Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter členov 3(2) in 6(1) Direktive 2004/82/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o obveznosti prevoznikov, da sporočajo podatke o potnikih UL L 261, 6.8.2004, str.
having regard to Article 8(2) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and Article 3(2) and Article 6 (1) of Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju dejstva, da bi moral Parlament kljub nepripravljenosti ostalih institucij zavzeti stališče o zadevi, ki vpliva na temeljne pravice državljanov in o kateri trenutno poteka razprava, ali naj se jo uredi z zakonodajo EU,
having regard to the fact that notwithstanding the unwillingness of the other institutions, Parliament should take a position on a matter which affects the fundamental rights of citizens and which is also currently under discussion as a possible subject for EU legislation,
ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 83(5) ter 94 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 114(3) and Rules 83(5) and 94 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0403/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0403/2008 ),
na Svet naslovi naslednja priporočila in opažanja:
Addresses the following recommendations and observations to the Council:
O postopkovnih vidikih
Procedural aspects
meni, da postopku, ki je bil uporabljen pri sklenitvi Sporazuma, primanjkuje demokratične legitimnosti, saj v nobeni fazi ni bilo omembe vrednega demokratičnega pregleda ali odobritve s strani Parlamenta; opaža, da Svet rutinsko izbira ta postopek za sklepanje mednarodnih sporazumov, ki vplivajo na temeljne pravice državljanov Evropske unije;
considers that the procedure followed for the conclusion of the Agreement lacks democratic legitimacy, as at no stage there was any meaningful democratic scrutiny or Parliamentary approval; notes that the Council routinely chooses this procedure for the conclusion of international agreements that affect the fundamental rights of European Union citizens;
ugotavlja, da se kljub večkratnim zahtevam Parlament v nobeni fazi ni bil obveščen niti se ni z njim posvetovalo glede sprejetja mandata, vodenja pogajanj ali sklenitve Sporazuma; zato meni, da postopek, ki ga uporablja Svet, ne upošteva načel o lojalnem sodelovanju;
notes that despite its repeated requests, Parliament has at no point been informed or consulted on the adoption of the mandate, conduct of the negotiations or the conclusion of the Agreement; and accordingly considers that the procedure followed by the Council does not comply with the principles of loyal cooperation;
ugotavlja, da se le v desetih od 27 držav članic zahteva odobritev nacionalnega parlamenta, sprememb pa sploh ni mogoče predlagati; meni, da je ta postopek popolnoma neustrezen; poleg tega ugotavlja, da bodo prihodnje spremembe pogojev Sporazuma izvedene brez odobritve nacionalnega parlamenta;
notes that national parliamentary approval is required in only ten out of the 27 EU Member States, without there being any possibility of proposing any modifications; considers this procedure to be totally inadequate; and notes that future modifications of the terms of the Agreement will be made without national parliamentary approval;
še vedno dvomi o pravni podlagi, ki jo je Svet izbral za mednarodni sporazum, ki je osredotočen izključno na notranje potrebe neke tretje države po varnosti in nima nobene dodane vrednosti za varnost EU, njenih držav članic ali državljanov EU; zato si pridržuje pravico, da poseže v postopek pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti, v primeru da bi tretja stran postavila pod vprašaj legitimnost Sporazuma;
remains in doubt as to the legal basis chosen by the Council for an international agreement which is focused purely on the internal security needs of a third State and which has no added value as far as the security of the EU, of its Member States or of EU citizens is concerned; therefore reserves its right to intervene before the Court of Justice of the European Communities in the event of the legitimacy of the Agreement being called into question by a third party;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da pri sprejemanju mandata za pogajanja in sklenitev morebitnih prihodnjih sporazumov o prenosu osebnih podatkov, zlasti pri najnovejših pogovorih z Južno Korejo o prenosu osebnih podatkov, v celoti vključita Parlament in nacionalne parlamente;
calls on the Council and the Commission to fully involve Parliament and national parliaments in the adoption of a mandate for negotiations and the conclusion of any future agreements on the transfer of personal data, particularly the current talks with South Korea on the transfer of PNR data;
O področju uporabe in namenu
Scope and purpose
opaža, da se v celotnem besedilu Sporazuma omenja širok izbor ciljev ter da se drug ob drugem uporabljajo različni termini:
notes that throughout the text of the Agreement a wide range of purposes is mentioned, and different terms are used side by side:
preprečevanje "terorizma in z njim povezanih kaznivih dejanj in drugih hudih kaznivih dejanj, ki so po naravi mednarodna, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom (uvod),
the fight against 'terrorism and related crimes and other serious crimes, including organised crime, that are transnational in nature' (introduction),
"strogo za namen preprečevanja in boja proti" terorizmu in z njim povezanimi kaznivimi dejanji (člen 5(1)(i)) ter hudim kaznivim dejanjem, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ki so po naravi mednarodna (člen 5(1)(ii)),
"strictly for the purpose of preventing and combating' terrorism and related crimes (Article 5(1)(i)) and other serious crimes, including organised crime, that are transnational in nature (Article 5(1)(ii)),
izogibanje sodnim nalogom ali prijetju zaradi zgoraj navedenih kaznivih dejanj (člen 5(1)(iii)),
flight from warrants or custody for the crimes described above (Article 5(1)(iii)),
za zaščito javne varnosti ter za namene kazenskega pregona (uvod),
to safeguard public security and law enforcement (introduction),
carina, priseljevanje in kriminal (sklicevanja na zadevne akte v uvodu),
customs, immigration and crime (references to respective Acts in introduction),
"tudi v posameznem primeru", kadar je to potrebno za zaščito ključnih interesov posameznika, na katerega se podatki nanašajo, ali drugih oseb, zlasti, če so ti posamezniki ali druge osebe v življenjski nevarnosti oziroma jim grozi huda poškodba (člen 5(2)),
"on a case by case basis' where necessary for the protection of the vital interest of the data subject or other persons, in particular as regards the risk of death or serious injury to the data subject or others (Article 5(2)),
veliko tveganje za javno zdravje (člen 5(2)),
a significant public health risk (Article 5(2)),
nadzor in odgovornost javne uprave, vključno z zahtevami v okviru Zakona o svobodi informiranja, Zakona o Komisiji za človekove pravice in enake možnosti, Zakona o zasebnosti, Zakona o vrhovnem revizorju ali Zakona o varuhu človekovih pravic (člen 5(3));
supervision and accountability of public administration, including requirements under the Freedom of Information Act, the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission Act, the Privacy Act, the Auditor General Act, or the Ombudsman Act (Article 5(3));
zato meni, da je omejitev namena popolnoma neustrezna ter da je zaradi tega nemogoče ugotoviti, ali so ukrepi upravičeni in sorazmerni; meni, da zaradi naštetih razlogov Sporazum morda ne ustreza standardom EU niti mednarodnim standardom o varstvu podatkov, prav tako pa ni skladen s členom 8 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki zahteva natančno omejitev namena; na podlagi tega ocenjuje, da bi bilo mogoče Sporazum pravno izpodbijati;
considers therefore that the purpose limitation is totally inadequate, making it impossible to establish whether the measures are justified and proportional; and that as a result, the Agreement may not conform to EU and international data protection standards, or comply with Article 8 of the ECHR, which requires a precise purpose limitation; considers that this might leave the Agreement open to legal challenge;
O varstvu podatkov
Data protection
pozdravlja dejstvo, da se bo avstralski Zakon o zasebnosti v celoti uporabljal za državljane EU, je pa zaskrbljen zaradi izjem in izvzetij, zaradi katerih bi lahko bili državljani EU deležni nepopolnega pravnega varstva; meni, da bi moral Sporazum poleg avstralskih zakonov o varstvu podatkov v celoti upoštevati tudi in predvsem zakone EU; vztraja, da zgolj upoštevanje sporazuma ne more nadomestiti formalne ugotovitve o primernosti, in da ni dovolj, da imajo zakoni, politike in načela Evropske unije in Avstralije o zaščiti podatkov skupne temelje;
welcomes the fact that the Australian Privacy Act will apply unabridged to EU citizens, but is concerned about any exceptions and exemptions that may leave EU citizens with incomplete legal protection; believes that the Agreement should be fully compliant not only with Australian data protection laws, but also and primarily with EU laws; insists that mere compliance with the Agreement cannot replace a formal adequacy finding, and that it is not sufficient that European Union and Australian data protection laws, policies and principles share a common base;
pozdravlja odločitev, da se skupine podatkov razkrijejo le, če so anonimne;
welcomes the decision to disclose data in bulk only when anonymised;
glede pravic posameznikov, na katere se podatki nanašajo, Sporazum določa, da bo Avstralija zagotovila sistem, ki bo dostopen posameznikom ne glede na njihovo državljanstvo ali državo prebivališča, da bodo lahko uresničevali svoje pravice; kar se tiče informiranja potnikov bi bilo dobrodošlo, če bi bili v avstralski Carinski službi pripravljeni informirati javnost o obdelavi podatkov iz PNR;
notes, with regard to the rights of the data subjects, that the Agreement provides that Australia shall provide a system, accessible by individuals regardless of their nationality or country of residence, for individuals to exercise their rights; with a view to informing passengers, the willingness of the Australian Customs Service to inform the public regarding the processing of PNR data should be welcome;
z razliko od Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in prenosu podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih (PNR) s strani letalskih prevoznikov ministrstvu Združenih držav za domovinsko varnost (MDV) (Sporazum PNR iz leta 2007) UL L 204, 4.8.2007, str.
remarks that, unlike the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of Passenger Name Record (PNR) data by air carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) (2007 PNR Agreement) OJ L 204, 4.8.2007, p.
obstaja določba o mehanizmu za reševanje sporov v primeru, da se pojavi spor med državami podpisnicami avstralskega sporazuma, kadar obstaja precejšnja verjetnost kršenja določb Sporazuma, pa organi EU za varstvo podatkov lahko uporabijo obstoječa pooblastila in prekinejo prenos podatkov, da bi s tem zavarovali posameznike, katerih osebni podatki se obdelujejo;
, in the event of a dispute arising between the parties to the Australian Agreement there is provision for a conflict resolution mechanism, and the EU data protection authorities may exercise their existing powers to suspend data flows to protect individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data where there is a substantial likelihood that the provisions of the Agreement are being infringed;
odobrava udeležbo organov za varstvo podatkov pri skupnem pregledu, vendar obžaluje, da ni bil trdno določen rok za takšen pregled; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zahtevata pregled pred junijem 2010 ter naj ugotovitve tega pregleda predstavita Parlamentu;
welcomes the participation of the data protection authorities in the joint review, but regrets that no firm deadline has been set for such a review; calls on the Commission and the Council to request a review before June 2010, and to present the findings of that review to Parliament;
glede nadaljnjega posredovanja podatkov pozdravlja dejstvo, da so možnosti za nadaljnje posredovanje podatkov omejene, zlasti zato, ker nadaljnje posredovanje podatkov poteka za vsak primer posebej, avstralska Carinska služba pa vodi evidenco o vseh razkritjih;
welcomes, in relation to onward transfers, the fact that there are limited possibilities for onward transfers, in particular since onward transfers take place only on a case-by-case basis and the Australian Customs Service maintains a log of all disclosures;
ugotavlja, da se skladno s členom 2(2) ne sme shraniti nobenih podatkov, v točki 12 priloge pa je omenjeno obdobje hrambe 5,5 let; čeprav je to obdobje krajše kot v sporazumih z Združenimi državami, Parlament meni, da je nemogoče potrditi sorazmernost obdobja hrambe 5,5 let, saj nameni hranjenja podatkov potnikov niso dovolj jasno opredeljeni;
notes that according to Article 2(2) no data will be stored, but that a retention period of 5,5 years is mentioned in the Annex, point 12; though shorter than in the agreements with the US, Parliament considers that the proportionality of a retention period of 5,5 years cannot be established, as the purposes for which passenger data are being stored are insufficiently specified;
glede občutljivih podatkov ugotavlja, da so pri avstralski Carinski službi izrecno izjavili, da ne želijo in ne potrebujejo občutljivih podatkov, kar sproža vprašanje, zakaj jih druge jurisdikcije, na primer kanadska in ameriška, potrebujejo, ter daje večja zagotovila, da bodo pri avstralski Carinski službi dejansko izločili vse občutljive podatke, ki jih bodo morebiti prejeli; dejstvo, da odgovornost upravljavca podatkov za "prečiščenje" občutljivih podatkov EU nosi prejemnik podatkov, to je avstralska Carinska služba, je skladno s sprejetimi standardi o varstvu podatkov, kot so tisti, ki jih vsebujeta konvencija Sveta Evrope št. 108 z dne 28. januarja 1981 Konvencija Sveta Evrope z dne 28. januarja 1981 o zaščiti posameznikov glede na avtomatsko obdelavo osebnih podatkov in njene kasnejše spremembe.
remarks, with regard to sensitive data, that the Australian Customs Service have specifically stated they do not want or need sensitive data, which begs the question of why other jurisdictions such as Canada and US need them and gives greater assurance that the Australian Customs Service will actually filter out and delete any sensitive data which they may receive; however, the fact that the responsibility of the data controller for filtering sensitive EU-sourced data is given to the recipient of the data, i.e. the Australian Customs Service, is consistent with accepted data protection standards, such as those of Convention 108 of 28 January 1981 of the Council of Europe Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data and subsequent amendments thereto.
vztraja, da je izmenjava diplomatskih not nesprejemljiv način dopolnjevanja seznama služb in agencij, ki lahko dostopajo do podatkov iz PNR;
insists that an exchange of diplomatic notes is an unacceptable method for amending the list of departments and agencies that may have access to PNR data;
glede kategorij podatkov, ki se jih posreduje avstralski Carinski službi, obžaluje, da spadajo zahtevani podatki v iste kategorije podatkov kot tisti v omenjenem sporazumu z ZDA iz leta 2007 (34 podatkovnih polj je bilo razvrščenih v 19 kategorij podatkov, zaradi česar je nastal vtis, da se je število prenosljivih podatkov bistveno zmanjšalo, vendar to ne drži); tako široka zbirka podatkov ni upravičena in jo je treba šteti za nesorazmerno;
deplores the fact that, taking into account the categories of data transferred to the Australian Customs Service, the data requested are the same categories of data as in the above mentioned 2007 US Agreement (the 34 data fields were grouped in 19 categories of data, giving the impression that the amount of transferable data had been markedly reduced, which was actually not the case); such a wide collection of data is not justified and must be considered disproportionate;
vabi države članice in nacionalne parlamente, ki trenutno pregledujejo navedeni sporazum in/ali sporazum z ZDA (Belgija, Češka republika, Španija, Madžarska, Nizozemska, Poljska), naj upoštevajo zgornja opažanja/priporočila;
Invites the Member States and the national parliaments which are currently examining this Agreement and/or the one with the US (Belgium, the Czech Republic, Spain, Hungary, the Netherlands and Poland) to take in account the observations/recommendations raised above;
opozarja Svet, da bi moral biti Parlament v primeru začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe primerno udeležen pri pregledu vseh sporazumov o PNR;
Reminds the Council that in the event of the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, Parliament should be associated on a fair basis with the review of all the PNR agreements;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter vladi in parlamentu Avstralije.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission and to the governments and parliaments of the Member States and to the government and parliament of Australia.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. oktobra 2008 o izzivih kolektivnih pogodb v EU ( 2008/2085(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 22 October 2008 on challenges to collective agreements in the EU ( 2008/2085(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 2, zlasti prve alinee, Pogodbe EU in člena 3(1)(j) Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 2, in particular the first indent, of the Treaty on European Union and Article 3(1)(j) of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 136, 137, 138, 139 in 140 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 136, 137, 138, 139 and 140 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju členov 12, 39 in 49 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 12, 39 and 49 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe EU, kakor je bila spremenjena z Lizbonsko pogodbo z dne 13. decembra 2007, zlasti člena 3 Pogodbe,
having regard to the Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon of 13 December 2007, in particular Article 3 thereof,
ob upoštevanju člena 152 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki priznava pomen socialnega dialoga in kolektivnih pogajanj za razvoj,
having regard to Article 152 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union which recognises the importance of social dialogue and collective bargaining for development,