natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
, in vedno večje število posameznikov kupuje izdelke v drugih državah članicah za osebno rabo in zanje upravičeno plačujejo trošarine v državi članici nakupa
, and a growing number of private individuals are buying products in another Member State for their personal use and legitimately paying excise duty for them in the Member State of purchase
z namenom uskladitve ustreznih nacionalnih zakonodaj, ki veljajo v državah članicah
, with a view to harmonising the relevant national laws in force in the Member States
Sprememba 4 UVODNA IZJAVA 7 (7)
Amendment 4 RECITAL 7 (7)
Sprememba 5 UVODNA IZJAVA 13 (13)
Amendment 5 RECITAL 13 (13)
Sprememba 6 UVODNA IZJAVA 14
Amendment 6 RECITAL 14
Odstavek 3 člena 9 je treba črtati, saj ni primerno obdržati davčno določbo, ki državam članicam omogoča, da kršijo načelo iz člena 8 zaradi varnostnih razlogov na področju prevoza mineralnih olj.
Article 9(3) should be deleted since it is not appropriate to retain a tax provision allowing Member States to derogate from the principle laid down in Article 8 in respect of the transport of mineral oils for safety reasons.
Sprememba 7 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 3, TOČKA B Člen 9, odstavek 2, uvodni del (Direktiva 92/12/EGS) 2.
Amendment 7 ΑRTICLE 1, POINT 3, POINT Β Article 9, paragraph 2, introductory wording (Directive 92/12/EEC) 2.
Pri določanju, ali so
To determine whether
proizvodi iz člena 8 predvideni za komercialne namene,
the products referred to in Article 8 are intended for commercial purposes,
države članice upoštevajo
Member States shall take
Proizvodi iz člena 8
The products referred to in Article 8
se štejejo za kupljene s strani posameznika za osebno rabo, razen če ni dokazano, da so
shall be deemed to have been purchased by private individuals for personal use unless it can be proven that they
predvideni za komercialne namene,
are intended for commercial purposes
ob upoštevanju svojih nedavno sprejetih resolucij z dne 11. marca 2004 UL C 102 E, 28.4.2004, str.
having regard to its recent resolutions of 11 March 2004 OJ C 102 E, 28.4.2004, p.
in 14. oktobra 2004 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2004)0022 .
and 14 October 2004 Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2004)0022 .
, v katerih je že povzel rezultate izvajanja programa iz Tampereja in oblikoval svoja izhodiščna priporočila Evropskemu svetu, ki je 5. novembra 2004 sprejel haaški program za prihodnjih pet let, v katerem so določene smernice za območje svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP),
taking stock of the implementation of the Tampere programme and formulating its initial recommendations to the European Council, which adopted, on 5 November 2004, the Hague Programme laying down the guidelines for the area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) for the following five years,
ker je v minulem letu, z izjemo prehoda na soodločanje za načrtovane ukrepe s področja nezakonitega priseljevanja, ni bilo želenega napredka glede OSVP, občutnemu napredku, doseženem na drugih področjih dejavnosti Skupnosti ali celo pri medvladnem sodelovanju na področju obrambne in varnostne politike, navkljub,
whereas last year, apart from the changeover to codecision for some planned measures on illegal immigration, the desired progress on the AFSJ did not take place in spite of significant developments in other areas of Community activity or even intergovernmental cooperation on defence and security policy,
ker je do postopne blokade prišlo tudi v Evropskem svetu, ki se je v letu 2004 trikrat moral seznaniti s težavami pri izvajanju sklepov Unije, predvsem na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja na kazenskem področju in bolj podrobno pri boju proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu,
whereas matters have gradually become deadlocked in the European Council, too, which in 2004, on three occasions, was obliged to acknowledge difficulties in implementing Union decisions on, in particular, police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters and, more specifically, in combating terrorism and international crime,
je zaskrbljen, ker mora kljub ponovljenim pozivom devet starih in šest novih držav članic še vedno ratificirati Konvencijo o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije, sprejeto 29. maja 2000, medtem ko enajst držav še vedno ni ratificiralo Protokola k Konvenciji Europol z dne 27. novembra 2003,
concerned that, in spite of repeated calls to do so, nine old Member States and six new Member States still have to ratify the Convention of 29 May 2000 on mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Member States of the European Union and that 11 countries have still not ratified the Protocol of 27 November 2003 to the Europol Convention,
je vznemirjen zaradi zamud in težav, s katerimi se srečujejo države članice, pri uporabi evropskega pripornega naloga, kot tudi zaradi zadržanosti, ki jo kažejo do pobud s področja pravosodnega sodelovanja ali mediacij v civilnih zadevah, ki jih nekatere države omejujejo zgolj na čezmejne primere; vse našteto odseva pomanjkanje zaupanja v odnosih med državami članicami,
alarmed at the delays, and the difficulties cited by Member States, in putting the European arrest warrant into practice, and at the timidity exhibited in initiatives on judicial assistance or mediation in civil matters, which some prefer to confine to cross-border cases only, all of which demonstrates the lack of trust characterising relations between Member States,
je prepričan, da vsi ti dejavniki vplivajo na verodostojnost politike Unije in legitimnost njenega delovanja v trenutku, ko se sooča z izzivom velikih razsežnosti v povezavi s politikami priseljevanja, nadzora meja, širjenja svoboščin ali pa za boja proti čezmejnemu kriminalu in terorizmu, in da je treba za vsako ceno nujno ponovno sprožiti oblikovanje skupnega območja in okrepiti vzajemno zaupanje med 25 državami članicami ter se pripraviti na širitev in pristop držav kandidatk,
convinced that all these factors are affecting the political credibility of the Union, and the legitimacy of its actions, at a time when it faces major challenges in connection with policies on migration, border controls, promoting freedoms and combating transnational crime and terrorism, and that, at all costs, there must be urgent action to relaunch the process of building a common area and boost mutual confidence between the 25 Member States and prepare for the accession and candidate countries' accession,
Nujno odpravljanje demokratičnega primanjkljaja in zavzemanje za enovit pravni okvir na OSVP
Doing away with the democratic deficit as a matter of urgency and promoting a uniform legal framework within the AFSJ
ponovno poziva Svet, naj vzpostavi enovit pravni okvir za politike, povezane z OSVP, in naj nujno prenese pravosodno in policijsko sodelovanje v okvir Skupnosti na podlagi člena 42 Pogodbe EU ter v skladu s členom 67 Pogodbe ES posploši uporabo kvalificirane večine v Svetu in uporabo postopka soodločanja za vsa področja politike, povezana z OSVP;
Repeats its call on the Council to establish a uniform legal framework for AFSJ-related policies, to move judicial and police cooperation into the Community sphere, pursuant to Article 42 of the EU Treaty, as a matter of urgency, and, in accordance with Article 67 of the EC Treaty, to use, as a matter of course, qualified-majority voting within the Council plus the codecision procedure for all AFSJ-related policies;
želi pritegniti pozornost Sveta na dejstvo, da ohranjanje trenutnih razmer v pričakovanju ratificiranja Ustavne pogodbe ne samo povečuje obstoječ demokratični primanjkljaj, ampak tudi onemogoča sprejemanje odločitev petindvajseterice ter praktično onemogoča preverjanje njihovega izvajanja (kakor kaže lastna presoja Evropskega sveta);
Draws the Council's attention to the fact that maintaining the status quo pending ratification of the Constitutional Treaty not only is worsening the democratic deficit, but also will make it impossible for the 25 to take decisions and virtually impossible for the implementation of those decisions to be verified (as the European Council's own assessments show);
zato poziva Komisijo, naj pred septembrom 2005 oblikuje predlog sklepa na podlagi člena 42 Pogodbe EU, v katerem bodo predvideni ukrepi na področjih, naštetih v členu 29 sodili pod naslov IV Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti, ob hkratni določitvi uporabe postopka odločanja s kvalificirano večino za njihovo sprejetje; poziva Svet, naj na podlagi člena 67 Pogodbe ES sprejme nov sklep, ki bo določil prehod na uporabo postopka soodločanja o ukrepih Skupnosti, predvidenih v naslovu IV, ter tudi odpravo omejitev glede pristojnosti Sodišča;
Calls therefore on the Commission to draw up before September 2005 a proposal for a decision, on the basis of Article 42 of the EU Treaty, providing that action in areas referred to in Article 29 is to fall under Title IV of the Treaty establishing the European Community and, at the same time, requiring such action to be decided on by qualified majority; calls on the Council to adopt a fresh decision, based on Article 67 of the EC Treaty, laying down a changeover to codecision for the Community measures provided for by Title IV and the removal of the limits on the Court's powers;
poziva Svet, naj v najkrajšem možnem času spremeni svoj poslovnik tako, da bo omogočen dostop do pripravljalnih besedil zakonodajnih aktov s tem v zvezi, vključno s pravnimi mnenji, pripravljenimi s tem v zvezi, kakor je EP ponovno zahteval v primerih C-52/05 P in C-32/05 P, kot tudi stališč držav članic, ki bo omogočalo, da bodo razprave in odločitve o teh vprašanjih javne, predvsem v času razprav odločanja o vprašanjih v zvezi z OSVP; prosi pristojni odbor, da preveri, če bi bilo v teh primerih primerno posredovati tako, da bi zagotovili preglednost ob sprejetju ukrepov, ki zadevajo evropske državljane;
Calls on the Council to amend its rules of procedure as soon as possible so as to disclose all preparatory legislative acts including legal opinions drafted in this context, as repeatedly requested by Parliament and in Cases C-52/05 P and C-39/05 P, and the positions taken by Member States, and to conduct its discussions and deliberations in public, particularly on AFSJ matters; asks its competent committee to check whether it would be appropriate to intervene in these cases so as to ensure transparency in the adoption of measures affecting European citizens;
želi pritegniti pozornost Sveta na potrebo, da se vsa napredovanja pri uresničevanju področja svobode, varnosti in pravice izvedejo glede na resno sodelovanje z EP in v skladu z načelom demokratičnosti, po katerem mora biti EP vključen v pripravo evropske zakonodaje od začetka, in ne šele takrat, ko je bil sklenjen politični sporazum;
Draws the Council's attention to the need to ensure that any progress in creating an area of freedom, security and justice is made in the context of sincere cooperation with the European Parliament and in compliance with the principle of democracy, according to which the European Parliament must be involved in the elaboration of European legislation from the outset and not merely once a political agreement has already been reached;
predlaga Komisiji, naj vzpostavi postopek rednega obveščanja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve o zunanjih vidikih OSVP, predvsem o pogajanjih za sklenitev sporazumov ter o političnem dialogu s tretjimi državami članicami in mednarodnimi organizacijami; poziva Komisijo, da konča pilotni projekt "TRANS-PNZ", ki mora omogočiti dnevno spremljanje dogodkov in dokumentov, povezanih z zakonodajnimi postopki v zvezi z OSVP, če bodo ti podatki in dokumenti dostopni v registru organov; poziva nacionalne parlamente, da se seznanijo s pilotnim projektom z usklajevanjem pripravljalnih del za vsak zakonodajni postopek v zvezi s sprejetjem ali prenosom ukrepov EU, povezanih z OSVP;
Proposes that the Commission establish a procedure for regular notification of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs about external aspects of the AFSJ, in particular negotiations on agreements plus political dialogue with non-member countries and international organisations; calls on the Commission to finalise the "TRANS-JHA" pilot project, which should make it possible to monitor events and documents relating to AFSJ legislative procedures on a day-to-day basis, provided that such information and documents are accessible on the institutions" registers; calls on the national parliaments to take part in this pilot project by making available on-line the preparatory work for each legislative procedure concerning the adoption or transposition of EU measures relating to the AFSJ;
poziva države članice, da ne prejudicirajo pristojnosti Evropske skupnosti in Evropske unije v zvezi z mednarodnimi sporazumi in da se zavzamejo za uvedbo "klavzul povezanosti" v mednarodne konvencije, ki omogočajo Uniji in Skupnosti, da pristopijo k takim konvencijam, ali najmanj "klavzul o prekinitvi", ki lahko zavarujejo pravni red Unije v odnosih med državami članicami, na področjih teh konvencij;
Calls on the Member States not to prejudice the powers of the European Community and the European Union in relation to international agreements and to seek to introduce in international conventions "connection clauses" enabling the Union and the Community to accede to such conventions or, at the very least, "disconnection clauses" to safeguard the EU acquis in relations between Member States within the areas covered by the conventions;
spodbuja vse institucije Unije, da vzdržujejo odprt, pregleden in reden dialog s predstavniškimi združenji in civilno družbo ter da pospešujejo in olajšajo sodelovanje državljanov v javnem življenju; prosi Komisijo, da čimprej predstavi predlog za sprejetje dejanskih ukrepov v tem smislu;
Encourages all the Union's institutions to maintain an open, transparent and regular dialogue with representative associations and civil society and to promote and facilitate citizens' participation in public life; asks the Commission to table as soon as possible a proposal aiming to take concrete steps in this direction;
Svoboda, varnost, pravica in solidarnost
Freedom, security, justice and solidarity
meni, da bi morali ukrepe za razvoj OSVP, vključiti v okvir Skupnosti, ne samo s pravnega vidika, ampak tudi z vidika političnih ciljev, s čimer bi se udejanjil duh solidarnosti med državami članicami in državljani; meni, da bi moral v ta namen Svet PNZ odpreti svoje postopke in odločati zlasti ob sodelovanju s:
Considers that AFSJ development measures should be incorporated into the Community sphere, not only from a legal point of view but also in terms of the political objectives to be realised in a spirit of solidarity between Member States and citizens; takes the view that, to that end, the JHA Council ought to open up its proceedings and deliberate with, in particular, the:
Svetom za razvoj, splošne zadeve in socialne zadeve pri oblikovanju politike priseljevanja, vključevanja in ponovnega sprejema,
Development, General Affairs and Social Affairs Councils when laying down immigration, integration and readmission policies,
Svetom za proračun in splošne zadeve pri določitvi ukrepov za finančno solidarnost ob izvajanju sistemov nadzora meja, azilne politike in politike vračanja ter glede uporabe infrastrukture in virov, potrebnih za civilno zaščito in preprečevanje katastrof in terorističnih napadov;
Budget and General Affairs Councils when laying down measures for financial solidarity as regards both the implementation of border control arrangements and asylum and return policies and the provision of infrastructure and resources needed for civil protection and for preventing disasters and terrorist attacks;
ponovno izraža trdno prepričanje, da oblikovanje OSVP zahteva še bolj dejavno udejstvovanje evropskih in nacionalnih institucij pri zavzemanju za čim višjo stopnjo zaščite temeljnih pravic, kar je tako v interesu posameznikov kakor tudi v izogib zamudam ali zavračanju prenosa sprejetih ukrepov v nacionalne zakonodaje; v ta namen predlaga, da:
Restates its firmly held view that establishment of the AFSJ demands an even greater commitment on the part of European and national institutions to promote the highest level of protection of fundamental rights, both in the interests of individuals and in order to prevent any subsequent delay in transposing measures adopted or any refusal to transpose them; proposes to that end that:
vse nove zakonodajne predloge, predvsem glede OSVP, spremlja presoja z utemeljitvijo njihovega vpliva na temeljne pravice; ob tem poziva delovno skupino komisarjev, zadolženo za temeljne pravice, da Odbor za državljanske svoboščine redno obvešča o delu in zagotovi dobro usklajenost svojega dela,
all new legislative proposals, in particular concerning ASFJ, be accompanied by a reasoned assessment of their impact on fundamental rights; calls furthermore on the group of Commissioners with responsibility for fundamental rights to notify the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs periodically about its proceedings and to ensure proper coordination of their respective work;
bi EP moral imeti enake pravice kot Svet, ko Komisija sprejme ukrepe za izvajanje zakonodajnih aktov Skupnosti in Unije, kadar bi ti akti lahko ogrozili temeljne pravice, kot je to pogosto na področjih OSVP,
Parliament should have the same rights as the Council in connection with Commission adoption of implementing measures for Community and Union legislative acts where those acts might affect fundamental rights, as is often the case in AFSJ-related fields;
prihodnje letne razprave EP o OSVP postanejo tudi priložnost za oceno varstva temeljnih pravic v Uniji, ki naj bo izvedena na podlagi specifičnih tematskih poročil, ki jih pripravi Komisija v povezavi s poročilom, predvidenim v členu 212 Pogodbe ES, skupaj z Agencijo za temeljne pravice, kakor je predlagal v svoji resolucija z dne 26. maja 2005 o promociji in varstvu temeljnih pravic: vloga nacionalnih in evropskih institucij, vključno z Agencijo za temeljne pravice Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0208 .
Parliament's future annual debates on the ASFJ also be an occasion for an assessment of the protection of fundamental rights within the Union on the basis of specific thematic reports drawn up both by the Commission, in connection with the report provided for in Article 212 of the EC Treaty, and by the Fundamental Rights Agency, as suggested in its resolution of 26 May 2005 on promotion and protection of fundamental rights: the role of national and European institutions, including the Fundamental Rights Agency Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0208 .
ocenjuje, da je za varstvo temeljnih pravic nujno naslednje:
Regards, in order to protect fundamental rights, the following action as urgent:
sprejetje ustreznih ukrepov za širjenje vključevanja manjšin in boj proti vsem oblikam diskriminacije (člen 13 Pogodbe ES), vključno s sprejetjem, po ponovnem posvetovanju z EP, okvirnega sklepa o rasizmu in ksenofobiji,
adoption of appropriate measures to foster integration of minorities and combat any form of discrimination (Article 13 of the EC Treaty), including adoption, after reconsultation of Parliament, of the framework decision on racism and xenophobia,
oblikovanje programa o kakovosti sodstva v Evropi ob soglasju držav članic in v skladu s svojim priporočilom Svetu z dne 22. februarja 2005 o kakovosti sodstva in usklajevanju kazenskega prava v državah članicah Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2005)0030 .
development, in agreement with the Member States, of a programme for quality justice in Europe in accordance with its recommendation to the Council of 22 February 2005 on the quality of justice and the harmonisation of criminal law in the Member States Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2005)0030 .
sprejetje skupnih ukrepov za dostop do sodnega varstva v kazenskih in civilnih zadevah v Evropi (preprečevanje dvojnih meril za čezmejne primere),
adoption of common measures on access to civil and criminal justice in Europe (preventing double standards for cross-border cases),
krepitev jamstev v postopkom; poziva Svet, da sprejme, kakor hitro je to mogoče, okvirni sklep o tem predmetu s primernim upoštevanjem mnenja EP; poziva Komisijo, da pred koncem leta 2005 predloži napovedane zakonodajne predloge v zvezi z:
strengthening procedural guarantees during trials; calls on the Council to adopt as soon as possible the framework decision on this subject, with due consideration for Parliament's opinion; calls on the Commission to submit before the end of 2005 the announced legislative proposals on:
– medsebojnim priznavanjem v predhodni fazi postopka,
- mutual recognition during the pre-trial phase,
– nadzornimi ukrepi, ki ne povzročajo izgube svobode,
- control measures which do not involve deprivation of freedom,
– načelom, da med odsotnostjo ne sme biti nihče dvakrat kaznovan za isto dejanje (ne bis in idem in absentia),
- "ne bis in idem in absentia" principle,
– pravičnim obravnavanjem pri pridobivanju in uporabi dokazov,
- fair treatment in obtaining and using evidence,
– pravicami, ki izhajajo iz domneve nedolžnosti,
- rights deriving from presumption of innocence;
sprejetjem ukrepov za solidarnost z žrtvami še posebej, če se nanašajo na otroke,
adoption of solidarity measures to aid victims, with special consideration for the situation of children,
uradna vključitev Evropskega kodeksa policijske etike Evropski kodeks policijske etike, Priporočilo REC (2001) 10, ki ga je sprejel Odbor ministrov Sveta Evrope 19. septembra 2001.
formal EU incorporation of the European Code of Police Ethics European Code of Police Ethics, Recommendation REC (2001) 10 adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 19 September 2001.
, ki ga je Svet PNZ neuradno že potrdil Svet Evropske unije, osnutek sklepov Sveta glede policijskih poklicnih standardov v zvezi z mednarodnim policijskim sodelovanjem, Bruselj, 28. oktobra 2004, 11977/2/04.
, already informally endorsed by the JHA Council (on 28 October 2004) Council of the European Union, Draft Conclusions of the Council regarding police professional standards concerning international police cooperation, Brussels, 28 October 2004, 11977/2/04.
28. oktobra 2004 in okrepitev vlogo Evropske policijske akademije (CEPOL);
, and strengthening the role of CEPOL;
Določitev natančnih ciljev EU in njenih držav članic
Defining the specific objectives of the EU and its Member States
navaja natančne cilje, ki se morajo uresničiti v dogovoru z državami članicami v prihodnjih petih letih, v zvezi z zmanjševanjem kriminalnih dejanj, zaščito posameznikov in krepitvijo svoboščin,
indicate the specific objectives to be achieved in agreement with the Member States during the next five years with regard to reducing crime, protecting individuals and strengthening freedoms,
predvideva pregleden mehanizem spremljanja na evropski in nacionalni ravni za izvajanje teh ciljev ter primerno analizo morebitnih pomanjkljivosti;
provide for a transparent monitoring mechanism at European and national level for the implementation of these objectives and an adequate assessment of any weaknesses;
opozarja, da kazensko pravosodno sodelovanje temelji na načelih vzajemnega zaupanja med sodnimi organi in državljani ter med samimi sodnimi organi in na medsebojnem priznavanju; ti cilji bodo doseženi z oblikovanjem skupnih pravil in boljšo izmenjavo podatkov med zadevnimi stranmi ter tudi z izobraževanjem sodnih uradnikov o evropskih vprašanjih; na tem področju je krepitev Eurojusta kot cilja uresničitve evropskega javnega tožilstva nujna;
Recalls that judicial cooperation in criminal matters rests on the principles of mutual trust between judicial authorities and citizens and between the judicial authorities themselves and mutual recognition; considers that these objectives will be achieved through the establishment of joint rules, more effective exchange of information between the parties concerned and the provision of training for magistrates on European issues; in this connection, it is essential to strengthen Eurojust, with the aim of establishing a European Prosecutor's Office;