natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Oddelek VIII (A) – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic
Section VIII (A) - Ombudsman
ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic zahteval le 10 uvrstitev v višji razred in da jih je Svet odobril;
Notes that only 10 upgradings have been requested by the Ombudsman and that these upgradings have been agreed to by the Council;
se je odločil omejiti dodeljena sredstva za organizacijo bienalnega seminarja nacionalnih varuhov, ki je letos v pristojnosti evropskega varuha človekovih pravic, na 45 000 EUR;
Has decided to limit the appropriation allocated to the organisation of the National Ombudsman Biennial Seminar for which the Ombudsman is responsible this year to EUR 45 000;
je za 150 000 EUR zvišal proračunska sredstva, ki jih je v predlogu poračuna odobril Svet, da bi povečal sredstva za prevajanje;
Has increased the appropriations made available by the Council in the draft budget by EUR 150 000 to top up the appropriation for translation;
Oddelek VIII (B) – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov
Section VIII (B) - European Data Protection Supervisor
meni, da bi moral biti načrt prihodkov in odhodkov natančnejši, zlasti glede zaposlenih in novih zahtev; poziva upravo evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov in Komisijo, da v okviru medinstitucionalnega sporazuma zagotovita ustrezno podporo za pripravo načrta prihodkov in odhodkov za naslednje proračunsko leto;
Considers that the Estimates should be more precise, particularly in terms of staff and new requirements; requests its Administration and the Commission, in the context of the interinstitutional agreement, to provide adequate support for the drawing up of the estimates for the next financial year;
odprtje 2 novih stalnih delovnih mest (1 AD9 in 1 AST5) poleg 3 novih (1 AD9, 1 AD8 in 1 AD7), ki jih je Svet v predlogu proračuna že odobril;
creation of 2 new permanent posts (1 AD9 and 1 AST5) in addition to the 3 new posts (1AD9, 1 AD8 and 1 AD7) already agreed to by Council in its draft budget;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo skupaj z osnutki dopolnil za oddelke I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) in VIII (B) predloga splošnega proračuna posreduje Svetu, Komisiji ter drugim zadevnim institucijam in organom.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution together with the amendments to Sections I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII (A) and VIII (B) of the draft general budget to the Council, the Commission and the other institutions and bodies concerned.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlog Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 639/2004 o upravljanju ribiških flot, registriranih v najbolj oddaljenih regijah Skupnosti ( KOM(2006)0433 - C6-0295/2006 - 2006/0148(CNS)
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Council Regulation (EC) No 639/2004 on the management of fishing fleets registered in the Community outermost regions ( COM(2006)0433 – C6-0295/2006 – 2006/0148(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0433 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0433 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 37 in 299(2) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0295/2006 ),
having regard to Articles 37 and 299(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0295/2006 ),
ker se spominja poguma in odločnosti Madžarov, ki so 23. oktobra 1956 zavzeli ulice v protest proti diktatorski vladavini Komunistične partije,
recalling the courage and determination of Hungarians who took to the streets in protest against the dictatorial rule of the Communist Party on 23 October 1956,
ker izraža spoštovanje vztrajnosti Madžarov, ki so svoj boj za svobodo in nacionalno neodvisnost ter človekove pravice nadaljevali kljub pomanjkanju kakršne koli vojaške pomoči Zahoda ter kljub posredovanju in veliki premoči Sovjetske zveze,
expressing its esteem for the perseverance of the Hungarians who continued their fight for freedom, national independence and civil rights in spite of the lack of any military help from the West and the intervention and overwhelming military preponderance of the Soviet Union,
ker pozdravlja žrtve vstaje – 2 170 ubitih v bojih ter žrtev krutega maščevanja – 228 usmrčenih med letoma 1956 in 1961, 20 000 priprtih in zaprtih med letoma 1956 in 1958 ter tisoče, ki jih je komunistično vodstvo po vrnitvi na oblast desetletja diskriminiralo,
saluting the victims of the Revolution – 2170 killed in the fighting – and those of the cruel retaliation – 228 executed between 1956 and 1961, 20 000 taken into custody and imprisoned between 1956 and 1958, and thousands discriminated against for decades after the Revolution by the returning Communist leadership,
izraža hvaležnost za solidarnost, ki jo je ljudstvo številnih zahodnih držav pokazalo s sprejemom 194 000 madžarskih beguncev v letih 1956 in 1957,
expressing its gratitude for the solidarity shown by people in many countries of the West as they welcomed 194 000 Hungarian refugees in 1956 and 1957,
ker priznava bistveno vrednost solidarnosti med narodi na splošno in še posebej med različnimi narodi Srednje in Vzhodne Evrope v boju za svobodo – Madžari, Čehi, Slovaki, Poljaki, Nemci, Estonci, Latvijci in Litovci,
recognising the essential value of solidarity between nations in general and, in particular, between the various nations of Central and Eastern Europe who have fought for their freedom – the Hungarians, Czechs, Slovaks, Poles, Germans, Estonians, Latvians and Lithuanians,
priznava zgodovinsko in politično vez med Madžarsko vstajo leta 1956 in raznimi drugimi uporniškimi oblikami in gibanji, na primer množičnimi demonstracijami v Vzhodni Nemčiji junija 1953, demonstracijami v Poznanju na Poljskem junija leta 1956, praško pomladjo leta 1968, rojstvom gibanja Solidarnost na Poljskem leta 1980 in demokratičnimi gibanji v nekdanji ZSSR, še posebej pri baltskih narodih,
recognising the historical and political link between the Hungarian Revolution in October 1956 and various other forms of resistance and resistance movements, such as the mass demonstrations in East Germany in June 1953, the Poznan demonstrations in Poland in June 1956, the Prague Spring of 1968, the birth of the Solidarity Movement in Poland in 1980 and democracy movements in the former USSR, notably those of the Baltic peoples,
priznava madžarsko vstajo kot simbolični izraz boja za svobodo in demokracijo v 20. stoletju, ki je kljuboval komunizmu in sovjetskemu bloku;
Recognises the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 as one of the 20th century's emblematic manifestations of the pursuit of liberty and democracy that defied Communism in the Soviet bloc;
pozdravlja hrabre madžarske može in ženske, ki so s svojim žrtvovanjem dali upanje drugim narodom pod komunistično vladavino;
Salutes the brave men and women of Hungary who, by their self-sacrifice, lit a beacon of hope for other nations under the stranglehold of Communist rule;
poudarja, da mora demokratična skupnost nedvoumno zavrniti represivno in nedemokratično komunistično ideologijo ter braniti načela svobode, demokracije, človekovih pravic in pravne države ter jasno obsoditi vse kršitve teh načel;
Underlines the fact that the democratic community must unequivocally reject the repressive and undemocratic Communist ideology and uphold the principles of liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and take a clear stand whenever they are violated;
B6-0539 , 0540 , 0541 , 0546 , 0551 in 0552/2006
B6-0539 , 0540 , 0541 , 0546 , 0551 and 0552/2006
ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta evropske sosedske politike za Moldavijo, sprejetega 22. februarja 2005, ki določa usmeritev za strateško sodelovanje med Republiko Moldavijo in Evropsko unijo,
having regard to the European Neighbourhood Policy Action Plan for Moldova, adopted on 22 February 2005, which sets the direction for strategic cooperation between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union,
ob upoštevanju izjav Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE) na vrhu v Istanbulu leta 1999 in zasedanja ministrskega sveta v Oportu leta 2002,
having regard to the statements of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) at the 1999 Summit in Istanbul and the 2002 Ministerial Council meeting in Oporto,
ob upoštevanju ukrajinske pobude "Z demokracijo do rešitve", ki jo je dne 22. aprila 2005 predstavil ukrajinski predsednik Viktor Juščenko,
having regard to the Ukrainian initiative 'Towards a Resolution through Democracy', launched by the President of Ukraine, Viktor Yushchenko, on 22 April 2005,
ob upoštevanju izjave predsedstva v imenu Evropske unije z dne 18. septembra 2006 o "referendumu" v pridnestrski regiji Republike Moldavije,
having regard to the Declaration by the Presidency on behalf of the European Union of 18 September 2006 on the 'referendum' in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova,
ker je v pridnestrski regiji Moldavije dne 17. septembra 2006 potekal "referendum" za popolno neodvisnost regije ter morebitno združitev z Rusko federacijo;
whereas a 'referendum' took place in the Transnistrian region of Moldova on 17 September 2006, aimed at full independence for the region and its possible unification with the Russian Federation,
ker mednarodna skupnost ni priznala "referenduma" niti njegovih izidov, saj ga je povsem enostransko izvedel represivni režim v Pridnestrju ter s tem onemogočil možnosti za dogovor o politični rešitvi spora v Moldaviji, in ker so bili zavajajoči ton vprašanj ter neizpolnjevanje osnovnih zahtev za svobodne in poštene volitve, kot so svoboda medijev, svoboda zbiranja in politični pluralizem, ocenjeni, da vnaprej določajo izid referenduma,
whereas neither this 'referendum' nor its outcome were accepted by the international community, as it was organised in a completely unilateral manner by the repressive regime of Transnistria, thus blocking the possibilities for a negotiated political solution to the conflict in Moldova, and as the suggestive character of the questions and the failure to meet basic requirements for free and fair elections such as freedom of the media, freedom of assembly and political pluralism were considered as predetermining the outcome of the referendum,
ker od leta 1992 potekajo pogajanja o statusu Pridnestrja v tako imenovani obliki 5+2, kjer sodelujejo Moldavija, pridnestrska regija Moldavije, Rusija, Ukrajina in OVSE ter EU in ZDA kot opazovalki; ker so bila pogajanja aprila 2006 prekinjena,
whereas negotiations concerning the status of Transnistria have been ongoing since 1992, in the so called 5+2 Format', in which Moldova, the Transnistrian region of Moldova, Russia, Ukraine and the OSCE are participating, with the EU and the USA as observers; whereas in April 2006 the negotiations broke down,
ker je EU pred nedavnim naredila pomembne korake, da bi okrepila svoje delovanje v Republiki Moldaviji in pospešila iskanje rešitve spora v Pridnestrju, in sicer z odprtjem stalne delegacije Komisije v Kišinjovu, z imenovanjem posebnega predstavnika EU za Moldavijo, ki naj bi prispeval k trajni rešitvi spora v Pridnestrju, in z ustanovitvijo misije EU za pomoč na mejah (EUBAM) v Moldaviji in Ukrajini,
whereas the European Union took important steps recently to enhance its engagement with the Republic of Moldova and the search for a resolution of the Transnistrian conflict by opening a permanent Commission delegation in Chisinau, appointing an EU Special Representative (EUSR) for Moldova with a mandate to contribute to a sustainable settlement of the Transnistrian conflict and establishing an EU Border Assistance Mission (EUBAM) to Moldova and Ukraine,
ker enostranskih gibanj za neodvisnost v Pridnestrju, Južni Osetiji in Abhaziji ne podpira nobena mednarodna organizacija in ker pod okriljem Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi in Združenih narodov še naprej potekajo prizadevanja za obnovo suverenosti in ozemeljske celovitosti Moldavije in Gruzije,
whereas the unilateral movements for independence in Transnistria, South Ossetia and Abkhazia are not being supported by any international organisation, and continuing efforts are being made under the auspices of the OSCE and the United Nations to restore the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Moldova and Georgia,
močno obsoja poskus pridnestrske regije Moldavije, da z izvedbo tako imenovanega referenduma enostransko doseže samostojnost;
Strongly denounces the attempt in the Transnistrian region of Moldova to establish its independence in a unilateral way by organising a so-called referendum;
poziva vlado Ruske federacije, naj odreče svojo podporo temu početju, zlasti izvedbi tako imenovanih referendumov o neodvisnosti regije; poziva vlado Ruske federacije, naj v celoti podpre večstranska prizadevanja za iskanje rešitve sporov v svoji soseščini; poziva vlado Ruske federacije, naj poleg tega izpolni zaveze, dane v Svetu Evrope leta 1996 in ki jih odražajo sklepi vrha OVSE (Istanbul 1999) in ministrskega sveta (Oporto 2002), o umiku ruskih vojakov in orožja z ozemlja Moldavije; izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi pomanjkanja napredka pri tem vprašanju;
Calls on the government of the Russian Federation to withhold its support from this move and in particular from the holding of so-called referenda on the independence of the region; calls on the government of the Russian Federation to give its fullest support to the multilateral efforts to find a solution to the conflicts in its neighbourhood; calls on the government of the Russian Federation, furthermore, to fulfil the commitments made in 1996 in the Council of Europe and reflected in OSCE Summit (Istanbul, 1999) and Council of Ministers (Oporto, 2002) decisions concerning the withdrawal of Russian troops and arms from the territory of Moldova; expresses concern over the lack of progress on this issue;
v celoti zavrača izvedbo in izid "referenduma" o neodvisnosti pridnestrske regije Moldavije ter njenega morebitnega pristopa k Ruski federaciji, ker je to v ostrem nasprotju z mednarodno priznano suverenostjo in ozemeljsko celovitostjo Republike Moldavije in ker represivni režim v Pridnestrju ne dovoljuje svobodnega izražanja volje ljudi;
Fully rejects the organisation and outcome of the 'referendum' on independence for the Transnistrian region of Moldova and its possible accession to the Russian Federation, as this is in sharp contradiction with the internationally recognised sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova and as the repressive regime in Transnistria does not allow for the free expression of the popular will;
poudarja, da je rešitev pridnestrskega vprašanja bistveni element za spodbujanje politične stabilnosti in gospodarske blaginje v Republiki Moldaviji in vsej regiji; poudarja, da je treba najti mirno rešitev spora, ki bo v skladu z Ustanovno listino in konvencijami Združenih narodov ter deklaracijami OVSE in ki bo v celoti spoštovala suverenost in ozemeljsko celovitost Republike Moldavije v okviru njenih mednarodno priznanih meja;
Stresses that the resolution of the Transnistrian issue constitutes a crucial element for promoting political stability and economic prosperity in the Republic of Moldova and in the whole region; stresses the need for a peaceful solution to the conflict, in line with the UN Charter and Conventions and OSCE declarations and with full respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova within its internationally recognised borders;
poziva vse strani v sporu, naj se vzdržijo ukrepov, ki bi še poslabšali položaj, ter naj se nemudoma vrnejo za pogajalsko mizo v okviru 5+2 in si prizadevajo za hitro in pregledno rešitev spora;
Calls on all parties to the conflict to refrain from any measures that would lead to a further escalation of the situation and to return immediately to the negotiating table in the 5+2 format and work towards a speedy and transparent solution of the conflict;
poziva Svet, države članice in Komisijo, naj še naprej v celoti podpirajo politično in mirno rešitev regionalnih sporov v soseščini, ki jo EU deli z Rusko federacijo, ter jih poziva, naj o teh vprašanjih razpravljajo na naslednjih srečanjih s predsednikom in vlado Ruske federacije;
Calls on the Council, the Member States and the Commission to continue to give their fullest support to a political and peaceful solution of the regional conflicts in the neighbourhood which the EU shares with the Russian Federation, and urges them to discuss these matters at their next meetings with the President and government of the Russian Federation;
poziva vlado Moldavije, naj sprejme ukrepe za krepitev zaupanja ter prebivalcem Pridnestrja predloži nove predloge s pozitivnimi spodbudami, da bi sami v celoti podprli mirno ponovno združitev države ob varstvu pravic manjšinskega jezika in lokalne avtonomije;
Calls on the government of Moldova to undertake confidence-building measures and put forward new proposals for the inhabitants of Transnistria, providing positive incentives in order for them fully to support a peaceful reunification of the state, with minority language rights and local autonomy being safeguarded;
obžaluje, da ni bistvenega napredka v pogovorih EU z Moldavijo o vizumskih olajšavah in sporazumu o ponovnem sprejemu; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj pospešita postopek za sklenitev sporazuma o vizumskih olajšavah z Moldavijo ter zagotovita njegovo izvajanje; meni, da je nepošteno in diskriminatorno, da pridnestrski državljani z ruskimi potnimi listi lažje potujejo v EU kot pa Moldavijci, kar še povečuje napetosti v pridnestrski regiji in ne spodbuja rešitve spora;
Regrets the lack of significant progress in the EU talks on visa facilitation and a readmission agreement with Moldova; calls on the Council and the Commission to speed up the procedure leading to the conclusion of a visa facilitation agreement with Moldova and to ensure its implementation; considers it unfair and discriminatory that Transnistrian citizens holding Russian passports are benefiting from the possibility of travelling to the EU more easily than Moldovans, which is contributing to increased tensions over the Transnistrian region and acting as a disincentive to settlement of the dispute;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad odločitvijo Ukrajine marca 2006, da na svoji meji s Pridnestrjem uvede nove carinske predpise v skladu z mednarodnim pravom;
Expresses its satisfaction with Ukraine's decision of March 2006 to impose new customs regulations on its border with Transnistria, in line with international law;
pozdravlja dobre rezultate misije EUBAM na meji med Moldavijo in Ukrajino, ki je bila ustanovljena marca 2005 ter igra pomembno vlogo v boju proti korupciji, nezakoniti trgovini in tihotapljenju, in sicer s povečevanjem preglednosti in vzpostavljanjem ustreznih operativnih in institucionalnih zmogljivosti v Moldaviji, da se zagotovi učinkovit nadzor na mejah, kar bo prispevalo h končni rešitvi pridnestrskega spora;
Welcomes the good results achieved by the EUBAM on the border between Moldova and Ukraine, which was established in March 2005 and is playing an important role in fighting corruption, illegal trade and trafficking by improving transparency and building up appropriate operational and institutional capacities in Moldova to ensure effective border control, thus contributing to the eventual settlement of the Transnistrian conflict;
odločno in trajno podpira prizadevanja Moldavcev za vzpostavitev delujoče demokracije, pravne države in spoštovanja človekovih pravic, kar je nujno za zagotavljanje napredka pri reformah;
Expresses its strong and continuing support for the efforts of the Moldovan people to establish a fully functioning democracy, the rule of law and respect for human rights, which are essential for ensuring the progress of reforms;
B6-0537 , 0538 , 0542 , 0547 , 0550 in 0553/2006
B6-0537 , 0538 , 0542 , 0547 , 0550 and 0553/2006
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Gruziji in zlasti tiste z dne 14. oktobra 2004 UL C 166 E, 7.7.2005, str.
having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia, in particular that of 14 October 2004 OJ C 166 E, 7.7.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju svojega priporočila Svetu z dne 26. februarja 2004 o politiki EU do južnega Kavkaza UL C 98 E, 23.4.2004, str.
having regard to its recommendation to the Council of 26 February 2004 on EU policy towards the South Caucasus OJ C 98 E, 23.4.2004, p.
in svoje resolucije z dne 26. maja 2005 o odnosih med EU in Rusijo UL C 117 E, 18.5.2006, str.
and to its resolution of 26 May 2005 on EU-Russia relations OJ C 117 E, 18.5.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med Evropskimi skupnostmi in njihovimi državami članicami na eni strani in Gruzijo na drugi, ki je začel veljati 1. julija 1999,
having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part, which entered into force on 1 July 1999,
ob upoštevanju izjave predsedstva z dne 20. julija 2006 o nedavnih dogodkih v Gruziji – Abhaziji in Južni Osetiji,
having regard to the Presidency declaration of 20 July 2006 on recent developments in Georgia - Abkhazia and South Ossetia,
ker se razmere v Južni Osetiji slabšajo in prihaja v zadnjih mesecih do incidentov, streljanj in vsakodnevnih spopadov med gruzijskimi in osetskimi silami ter policijo, kar povzroča žrtve in poškodbe,
whereas the situation in South Ossetia is deteriorating, with incidents, shootouts and clashes between Georgian and Ossetian forces and police units in recent months causing deaths and injuries,
ker sta obe strani predstavili dva ločena mirovna načrta z veliko skupnimi točkami, ki bi lahko bile oziroma bi morale biti podlaga za uspešna pogajanja; ker se je skupna komisija za nadzor nedavno izkazala kot neprimerna za doseganje bistvenega izida,
whereas the two sides have put forward two separate peace plans which contain many common elements that could and should be used as a basis for fruitful negotiations; whereas the Joint Control Commission (JCC) has lately proved incapable of producing significant results,
ker se je Južna Osetija odločila, da se za 12. november 2006 vzporedno s predsedniškimi volitvami razpiše tudi referendum o samoodločbi,
whereas South Ossetia decided to hold a referendum on self-determination together with the presidential election on 12 November 2006,
ker je Gruzija začela poglobljen dialog z Natom o polnopravnem članstvu v tej organizaciji,
whereas Georgia has moved to the stage of "Intensified Dialogue" with NATO with a view to becoming a full member of that organisation,
je močno zaskrbljen zaradi diplomatskih težav Gruzije in Rusije, do katerih je prišlo, ker je gruzijska protiobveščevalna služba zaradi domnevnega vohunjenja nedavno priprla štiri častnike ruske vojaške obveščevalne službe in ker je Moskva po tem dogodku ruskega veleposlanika odpoklicala na posvet,
deeply worried at the diplomatic crisis between Georgia and Russia following the recent arrests of four officers from Russia's military intelligence service by the Georgian counterintelligence services on allegations of espionage and the subsequent recall of the Russian ambassador to Moscow for consultations,
ker so ruske oblasti 2. oktobra 2006 prekinile vse cestne, zračne in morske povezave z Gruzijo, med drugim tudi poštno povezavo, čeprav je Gruzija štiri oficirje izročila Organizaciji za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE) in so zdaj že v Rusiji,
whereas on 2 October 2006 the Russian authorities interrupted all land, air and sea links with Georgia, including mail communications, although the four officers had been released to the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and are now back in Russia,