natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je bistveno, da institucije in organi EU v celoti izkoristijo potrebna sredstva za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in izčrpne odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies make full use of the necessary resources in order to fulfil their obligation to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
ker kljub temu, da je preteklo že osem let od sprejetja resolucije Parlamenta z dne 6. septembra 2001 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o posebnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic Evropskemu parlamentu po preiskavi na lastno pobudo o obstoju kodeksa dobrega ravnanja javnih uslužbencev v institucijah in organih Skupnosti in njegovi javni dostopnosti (UL C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
whereas, although eight years have passed since the adoption of Parliament's resolution of 6 September 2001 European Parliament resolution on the European Ombudsman's Special Report to the European Parliament following the own-initiative inquiry into the existence and the public accessibility, in the different Community institutions and bodies, of a Code of Good Administrative Behaviour (OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
, s katero je bil potrjen kodeks dobrega upravnega ravnanja, ki ga je pripravil varuh človekovih pravic, druge glavne institucije še vedno niso v celoti upoštevale poziva Parlamenta, naj delujejo v skladu z določbami tega kodeksa,
approving the Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, the other main institutions have not yet fully complied with Parliament's request that they bring their practice into line with the provisions of that code,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2008 zabeležil 3406 pritožb v primerjavi s 3211 pritožbami leta 2007 in ker je bilo za 802 pritožbi v primerjavi z 870 pritožbami v letu 2007 ugotovljeno, da so v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas the Ombudsman registered 3 406 complaints in 2008, compared to 3 211 in 2007, and whereas 802 complaints, compared to 870 in 2007, were found to be within the Ombudsman's mandate,
ker rezultati 355 opravljenih preiskav, od katerih jih je bilo 352 povezanih s pritožbami, tri pa so bile opravljene na pobudo varuha človekovih pravic, kažejo, da v 110 primerih (kar je 31 % obravnavanih pritožb) ni bilo ugotovljenih nepravilnosti,
whereas the findings of the 355 completed inquiries, of which 352 were linked to complaints and three were own-initiative investigations, show that in 110 cases (corresponding to 31% of the complaints investigated) no maladministration was ascertained,
ker so v 129 primerih (36 % vseh zadev), zaključenih leta 2008, zadevne institucije sprejele sporazumno rešitev ali zadevo rešile, kar kaže na veliko pripravljenost institucij in organov, da pritožbe varuhu vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelovanje z njim v korist državljanov,
whereas in 129 cases (36% of the total) closed in 2008, the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter, which shows a strong willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to remedy mistakes that have occurred and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens,
ker so bili leta 2008 štirje primeri zaključeni, potem ko je bila dosežena sporazumna rešitev, in ker je bilo konec leta 2008 v obravnavi še 25 predlogov za sporazumno rešitev,
whereas four cases were closed in 2008 after an amicable resolution had been achieved and whereas, at the end of 2008, 25 proposals for amicable solutions were still under consideration,
ker je bilo v letu 2008 največ pritožb o slabem upravljanju, ki jih je obravnaval varuh človekovih pravic, povezanih s pomanjkljivo preglednostjo (36 % začetih preiskav),
whereas the most common allegation of maladministration dealt with by the Ombudsman in 2008 was lack of transparency (in 36% of inquiries opened),
ker je leta 2008 varuh človekovih pravic pogosteje uporabil neformalne postopke za hitro reševanje pritožb, kar dokazuje, da je zelo spoštovan in da so institucije pripravljene pomagati državljanom,
whereas in 2008 the Ombudsman increasingly made use of more informal procedures aimed at the prompt resolution of complaints, which proves the extent to which the Ombudsman is respected and demonstrates the institutions" readiness to help citizens,
ker je leta 2008 varuh človekovih pravic 44 preiskav zaključil s kritično oceno in ker ta ocena pritožniku oziroma pritožnici potrdi, da je pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji ali organu pa nakaže, kje je storil napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje,
whereas in 2008 the Ombudsman closed 44 inquiries with critical remarks, and whereas a critical remark confirms to the complainant that his or her complaint is justified and indicates to the institution or body concerned what it has done wrong, so as to help it avoid maladministration in the future,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic večkrat uporabil dodatne ocene, s katerimi odkriva priložnosti za povečanje kakovosti upravnih storitev, da bi izboljšal delovanje institucij EU v prihodnje, in ker je bila dodatna ocena v letu 2008 podana v skupno 41 primerih,
whereas it is with a view to improving the EU institutions" performance in the future that the Ombudsman has made increasing use of further remarks by which he identifies an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration, and whereas further remarks were made in a total of 41 cases in 2008,
ker je bilo leta 2008 izdanih 23 osnutkov priporočil, od katerih so jih osem sprejele zadevne institucije, za štiri iz leta 2007 pa je bil leta 2008 sprejet sklep,
whereas 23 draft recommendations were issued in 2008, of which eight were accepted by the institution concerned, and whereas four draft recommendations from 2007 led to a decision in 2008,
ker je bilo za en primer slabega upravljanja leta 2008 Evropskemu parlamentu predloženo posebno poročilo in ker je predložitev tega poročila pomembno sredstvo, s katerim varuh človekovih pravic zaprosi za politično podporo Parlamenta in njegovega odbora za peticije, kadar gre za zagotovitev zadoščenja državljanov, katerih pravice so bile kršene, in izboljšanje upravnih standardov v Evropski uniji,
whereas one case of maladministration led to a special report to the European Parliament in 2008, and whereas submitting a special report to Parliament represents a valuable means by which the Ombudsman can seek the political support of Parliament and its Committee on Petitions in order to bring satisfaction to citizens whose rights have been infringed, as well as promoting the improvement of standards of EU administration,
ker niti kritične ocene v odločbah, s katerimi se zaključijo nerazrešljivi primeri nepravilnosti, niti priporočila ali posebna poročila varuha človekovih pravic niso zavezujoči, saj mu pooblastila ne omogočajo, da bi neposredno rešil tovrstne primere, ampak so namenjena spodbujanju samoregulacije v institucijah in organih Evropske unije,
whereas neither the critical remarks contained in decisions closing irremediable cases of maladministration, nor recommendations or special reports by the Ombudsman, have binding effect, as his powers do not extend to directly remedying instances of maladministration but are intended to encourage self-regulation on the part of the European Union's institutions and bodies,
ker ima Parlament od začetka veljavnosti Pogodbe iz Nice enake pravice kot države članice, Svet in Komisija, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti zaradi nepristojnosti, bistvene kršitve postopka, kršitve Pogodbe ES ali katerega koli pravnega pravila, ki se nanaša na njeno uporabo, ali zaradi zlorabe pooblastil,
whereas, since the entry into force of the Treaty of Nice, Parliament has enjoyed the same right as the Member States, the Council and the Commission to bring an action before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on grounds of lack of competence, infringement of an essential procedural requirement, infringement of the EC Treaty or of any rule of law relating to its application, or misuse of powers,
ker lahko institucionalni in drugi organi Evropske unije na podlagi kritičnih pripomb glede slabega upravljanja, ki jih je varuh človekovih pravic navedel v svojem poročilu za leto 2008 (kritične ocene, osnutki priporočil in posebno poročilo), izvajajo ustrezne ukrepe, da se napake in slabo delovanje v prihodnosti ne bi ponavljali,
whereas the critical comments regarding maladministration voiced by the Ombudsman in the 2008 report (critical remarks, draft recommendations and special report) may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future by the implementation of appropriate measures by the institutions and other bodies of the European Union,
ker sodelovanje, ki ga je vzpostavil varuh človekovih pravic v okviru evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, že več kot deset let deluje kot prožen sistem za izmenjavo informacij in dobre prakse ter kot sredstvo za preusmerjanje pritožnikov na varuhe človekovih pravic ali podobne organe, ki jim lahko najbolje pomagajo,
whereas the cooperation established by the Ombudsman within the European Network of Ombudsmen has functioned for over ten years as a flexible system for exchanging information and best practice and as a means of re-directing complainants to the ombudsmen or other similar bodies most able to assist them,
ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri zaščiti interesov državljanov EU v odnosih z institucijami in organi Evropske unije v štirinajstih letih od ustanovitve njegove funkcije okrepila, zahvaljujoč njegovi neodvisnosti in demokratičnemu nadzoru njegovih dejavnosti, ki ga izvaja Parlament,
whereas the role of the Ombudsman in protecting the interests of EU citizens in the face of the institutions and bodies of the European Union has evolved in the 14 years since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and Parliament's democratic scrutiny of the transparency of his activities,
ker morajo dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in odbora za peticije ostati ločene in ker morata zadeve, ki jih obravnavata, praviloma predložiti drug drugemu, da preprečita morebitne spore glede svojih pooblastil,
whereas the activities of the Ombudsman and of the Committee on Petitions must remain separate and – as a general rule aimed at avoiding potential conflicts as regards their respective prerogatives – should include reciprocal referral of their respective files,
odobri letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2008 in njegovo strukturo, kjer je povzetek dejavnosti v tem letu združen s pregledom pritožb in preiskav ter vsebinsko analizo sklepov varuha človekovih pravic, ki zajema najpomembnejše izsledke iz zakonov in dejstev iz sklepov varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2008, pa tudi probleme, ki so se pojavili v različnih fazah postopka;
Approves the annual report for the year 2008 presented by the European Ombudsman and its structure, combining a summary of the year's activities with an overview of the complaints and inquiries and a thematic analysis of the Ombudsman's decisions, covering the most significant findings of law and fact contained in the Ombudsman's decisions in 2008, as well as the problems raised at various stages of the procedure;
poziva, naj vse institucije in organi EU prejmejo proračunska sredstva in kadre, ki jih potrebujejo, da bi lahko državljanom dali hitre in vsebinske odgovore na vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije;
Calls for all EU institutions and bodies to be given the necessary budgetary and human resources to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions;
meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic še naprej dejavno in uravnoteženo izvajal svoja pooblastila v zvezi s preučevanjem in obravnavanjem pritožb ter vodenjem in sklepanjem preiskav, pa tudi glede ohranjanja konstruktivnih odnosov z institucijami in organi Evropske unije ter spodbujanja državljanov, da v odnosu do teh institucij in organov uveljavljajo svoje pravice;
Considers that the Ombudsman has continued to exercise his powers in an active and balanced way, both with regard to examining and handling complaints and conducting and concluding enquiries and with regard to maintaining constructive relations with the European Union's institutions and bodies and encouraging citizens to make use of their rights in relation to those institutions and bodies;
poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj nadaljuje prizadevanja za večjo ozaveščenost o svojem delu ter zagotovi učinkovito in pregledno izvajanje svojih dejavnosti;
Calls on the Ombudsman to pursue his efforts in raising awareness of his work and to promote his activities effectively and transparently;
meni, da je treba izraz "slabo upravljanje" še naprej obravnavati širše, tako da bo zajemal ne le kršitve zakonitih predpisov ali splošnih načel evropskega upravnega prava, kakršna so objektivnost, sorazmernost in enakost, nediskriminacija ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, temveč tudi primere, ko institucije ne delujejo dosledno in v dobri veri ali ne upoštevajo upravičenih pričakovanj državljanov, kar velja tudi za institucije, ki so se zavezale, da bodo spoštovale nekatera pravila in standarde, ne da bi jih k temu obvezovale pogodbe ali sekundarna zakonodaja;
Considers that the term "maladministration" should continue to be broadly interpreted so as to include not only infringements of legal rules or general principles of European administrative law, such as objectivity, proportionality and equality, non-discrimination, and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, but also instances where an institution fails to act consistently and in good faith, or to take into account the legitimate expectations of citizens, including when an institution has itself undertaken to respect certain norms and standards without being obliged to do so by the Treaties or secondary legislation;
meni, da vloga varuha človekovih pravic pri spodbujanju preglednosti in odgovornosti v postopku odločanja in upravljanja v Evropski uniji pomembno prispeva k oblikovanju Unije, v kateri se odločitve sprejemajo "v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani", kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji;
Regards the role of the Ombudsman in enhancing openness and accountability in the decision-making processes and administration of the European Union as an essential contribution towards a Union in which decisions are taken "as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen", as provided for in Article 1(2) of the Treaty on European Union;
ponavlja svojo zahtevo iz prejšnjih resolucij, da morajo vse institucije in organi EU sprejeti skupen pristop v zvezi z evropskim kodeksom dobrega upravnega ravnanja;
Repeats its call, expressed in previous resolutions, for all EU institutions and bodies to adopt a common approach with regard to the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour;
opozarja, da kodeks dobrega upravnega ravnanja, ki ga je pripravil varuh človekovih pravic in ga je odobril Parlament 6. septembra 2001, služi kot vodilo in vir za zaposlene v vseh institucijah in organih Skupnosti ter je objavljen in se redno posodablja na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic;
Notes that the Code of Good Administrative Behaviour proposed by the Ombudsman, as approved by Parliament on 6 September 2001, serves as a guide and resource for the staff of all Community institutions and bodies and has been regularly updated and published on the Ombudsman's website;
pozdravlja revizijo statuta varuha človekovih pravic, zlasti večja pooblastila za preiskavo, s čimer bi pomagali zagotoviti, da bodo državljani popolnoma zaupali v njegovo zmožnost, da brez omejitev temeljito razišče njihove pritožbe;
Welcomes the revision of the Ombudsman's Statute, in particular the Ombudsman's strengthened powers of investigation which will help to ensure that citizens can have full confidence in his ability to conduct a thorough investigation of their complaints without restrictions;
poudarja, da je treba z obveščanjem državljanov, podjetij, nevladnih organizacij in drugih prispevati k boljšemu javnemu razumevanju nalog varuha človekovih pravic, ter meni, da bi lahko s preprosto razumljivimi, natančnimi in kakovostnimi informacijami zmanjšali število pritožb, ki niso v njegovi pristojnosti;
Stresses the need to contribute to the public understanding of the duties of the Ombudsman by providing citizens, companies, non-governmental organisations and other entities with information, and considers that easily understood, accurate and high-quality information may help to reduce the number of complaints which do not fall within the Ombudsman's mandate;
meni, da je delež nedopustnih pritožb še vedno previsok, čeprav ga je mogoče razumeti, in priporoča izvedbo stalne kampanje obveščanja evropskih državljanov, ki naj bo namenjena osveščanju o funkciji in pristojnostih članov evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic;
Considers that the figure in respect of inadmissible complaints remains unsatisfactory although understandable, and recommends in view of this that a continued information campaign be conducted amongst European citizens designed to raise their awareness of the functions and competence of the members of the European Network of Ombudsmen;
priznava trud varuha človekovih pravic za boljše delovanje institucij ter njegova prizadevanja, da bi dodatno skrajšali obravnave, ki sedaj trajajo povprečno trinajst mesecev;
Recognises the Ombudsman's efforts to improve the institutions" performance and his endeavours aimed at further shortening the current average length of inquiry of 13 months;
pozdravlja konstruktivno sodelovanje varuha človekovih pravic z institucijami in organi EU ter potrjuje njegovo vlogo zunanjega nadzornega mehanizma, pa tudi dragocenega vira za nenehno izboljševanje evropske uprave;
Welcomes the constructive cooperation between the Ombudsman and the EU institutions and bodies and endorses him in his role of external control mechanism and, in addition, as a valuable source of ongoing improvement to European administration;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da sta bila 9. julija 2008 podpisana memorandum o soglasju med varuhom človekovih pravic in predsednikom Evropske investicijske banke ter sporazum agencij Evropske unije, da bodo sprejele Evropski kodeks dobrega upravnega ravnanja v svojih odnosih z državljani;
Welcomes the signing on 9 July 2008 of a Memorandum of Understanding between the Ombudsman and the European Investment Bank and the agreement by the Union's agencies to adopt the European Code of Good Administrative Behaviour in their relations with citizens;
poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj še naprej spremlja dogajanje in zagotovi, da bo Komisija ustrezno uporabila svoje diskrecijske pravice za začetek postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev po členu 226 Pogodbe ES ali predlog denarne kazni po členu 228 Pogodbe ES, pri tem pa naj dosledno skrbi, da ne bo zamujala ali neupravičeno na hitro sprejemala ukrepov, kar ni v skladu z njenimi pooblastili za nadzor nad izvajanjem prava EU, ter zahteva, da v zvezi s tem še naprej sodeluje z odborom za peticije;
Calls on the Ombudsman to maintain a watching brief and ensure that the Commission makes proper use of its discretionary powers to initiate infringement proceedings under Article 226 of the EC Treaty or to propose penalties under Article 228 of the EC Treaty, while taking scrupulous care to avoid delays or unjustifiable failure to take prompt action, which are incompatible with the Commission's powers to oversee the application of EU law, and requests that he continue to liaise with the Committee on Petitions in this connection;
ponovno poudarja svoje mnenje, da če katera institucija noče ravnati v skladu s priporočilom iz posebnega poročila varuha človekovih pravic, čeprav ga je odobril Parlament, slednji lahko legitimno uporabi svoja pooblastila, da vloži tožbo pri Sodišču zaradi dejanja ali opustitve, ki je predmet varuhovega priporočila; poziva odbor, pristojen za poslovnik, naj predlaga ustrezne določbe, ki bi se vanj vključile, da bi bilo mogoče začeti ta postopek;
Reiterates its view that, if an institution refuses to follow a recommendation contained in a special report by the Ombudsman despite Parliament having approved that recommendation, Parliament could legitimately use its powers to bring an action before the Court of Justice in respect of the act or omission which was the subject of the Ombudsman's recommendation; invites the committee responsible for the Rules of Procedure to propose appropriate provisions, to be introduced into the Rules, for the initiation of such an action;
ugotavlja, da je varuh človekovih pravic predložil posebno poročilo, v katerem je kritično opozoril Komisijo, da ni ustrezno upravičila svojega obravnavanja zunanjih pomožnih konferenčnih tolmačev, starejših od 65 let, o čemer je Parlament 5. maja 2009 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0340 .
Notes that the Ombudsman has presented a special report criticising the Commission for having failed adequately to justify its treatment of freelance auxiliary conference interpreters over 65 years of age, on which Parliament adopted a resolution on 5 May 2009 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0340 .
meni, da bi lahko varuh človekovih pravic in odbor za peticije, kadar v okviru svojih nalog in pristojnosti preiskujeta vprašanja, ki se prekrivajo – npr. na eni strani način, kako Komisija obravnava kršitve, in na drugi strani kršitve same –, s tesnim sodelovanjem dosegla veliko koristnejšo sinergijo;
Considers that, when the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions, acting within their respective mandates and competences, investigate overlapping issues, such as, respectively, the manner in which the Commission has conducted infringement proceedings and the alleged infringement itself, they can achieve a much more useful synergy through close cooperation;
pozdravlja izredno sodelovanje med varuhom človekovih in odborom za peticije v institucionalnih okvirih v zvezi z medsebojnim spoštovanjem pristojnosti in posebnih pravic;
Welcomes the excellent relationship between the Ombudsman and the Committee on Petitions within the institutional frameworks as regards reciprocal respect of competences and prerogatives;
priznava, da je prispevek evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, katere član je tudi odbor za peticije, v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti koristen pri zagotavljanju izvensodnih rešitev; pozdravlja sodelovanje evropskega varuha človekovih pravic z varuhi človekovih pravic in podobnimi organi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni v posameznih državah članicah ter poziva k nadaljnji krepitvi izmenjave najboljše prakse, kar bo omogočilo hitro širjenje dobre prakse med državami članicami;
Recognises the useful contribution made by the European Network of Ombudsmen, of which the Committee on Petitions is a member, in line with the principle of subsidiarity, in securing extra-judicial remedies; welcomes the collaboration between the European Ombudsman and ombudsmen and similar bodies at national, regional and local levels in the Member States, and urges further strengthening of the exchange of best practice, thereby allowing for the rapid spread of best practices among Member States;
pozdravlja objavo dveh študij iz leta 2008 o nadaljnjih postopkih zadevnih institucij v zvezi s kritičnimi in dodatnimi ocenami, podanimi v letih 2006 in 2007, na spletni strani varuha človekovih pravic;
Welcomes the publication on the Ombudsman's website in 2008 of two studies regarding the follow-up given by the institutions concerned to critical and further remarks made in 2006 and 2007;