natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje, da je glede na končni uspeh pri postopku prijave le 53 do 86 % vseh zadevnih strani v celoti razumelo naravo instrumenta, ki se uporablja v šestem okvirnem programu; obžaluje, da je bila v nekaterih primerih izbira instrumenta očitno usmerjena k davčnim in ne materialnim posledicam; opaža, da je veliko število partnerjev v mrežah odličnosti in tudi močan poudarek Komisije na pravni integraciji poseben izziv, ter da je skupina strokovnjakov o prihodnosti mrež odličnosti priporočila, naj se širša partnerstva oblikujejo le v izrednih in primerno upravičenih primerih Končno poročilo skupine strokovnjakov o prihodnosti mrež odličnosti (september 2008 - „ER“), str.
Considers it unfortunate that, depending on their eventual success in the application procedure, only 53 % to 86 % of all parties concerned fully understood the nature of the instruments applied in the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6); regrets the fact that in some cases the choice of instrument was apparently geared to fiscal rather than material considerations; notes that the existence of a high number of partners in the Networks of Excellence (NoEs), as well as the Commission's strong focus on legal integration, constitutes a specific challenge, and that the expert group on the future of NoEs has recommended that larger partnerships should be formed only in exceptional, duly justified cases Final Report of the expert group on the future of networks of excellence (September 2008 – ‘ER’), p.
obžaluje, da je bil kljub zahtevam Parlamenta po bolj storitveno naravnanemu in strankam namenjenemu izvajanju raziskovalnih programov dosežen le omejen napredek pri oblikovanju storitev „vse na enem mestu“, kar bi vključevalo vse generalne direktorate v raziskovalni skupnosti, standardizacijo postopkov prijave, potrebno dokumentacijo in dosledno informiranje; poudarja, da je Komisija za javnost en sam subjekt;
Regrets that, notwithstanding Parliament's demands for a more service- and customer-oriented implementation of research programmes, only limited progress has been achieved in the formation of ‘one-stop shops’ covering the full range of Directorates-General within the research family, standardisation in terms of application procedures, prerequisite documentation and consistent communication; highlights the fact that the public regards the Commission as a single entity;
glede tega zahteva, naj Komisija končno sprejme potrebne ukrepe za proaktiven pristop na področju pomoči uporabnikom, notranjega nadzora kakovosti, vključno s standardizacijo na drugi stopnji, in skladnega upravljanja; poziva Komisijo, naj na spletu omogoči dostop do vseh pravnih besedil, na katerih so zasnovane pogodbe o nepovratnih sredstvih, po potrebi tudi s sklicevanjem na belgijsko zakonodajo;
Demands in that respect that the Commission finally take the appropriate steps towards a pro-active approach in terms of customer support, internal quality control, including second-level standardisation, and coherent management; asks the Commission to make available on-line all legal texts on which the grants contracts are based including, where appropriate, references to Belgian law;
opozarja na neprestane zahteve Parlamenta po zmanjšanju upravnega bremena, zlasti v postopkih dodeljevanja nepovratnih sredstev SEK(2006)0866 – C6-0231/2006 – 2006/0900(CNS) .
Recalls Parliament's constant demands for a reduction of the administrative burden, in particular in grants procedures SEC(2006)0866 – C6-0231/2006 – 2006/0900(CNS) .
; obžaluje, da je povprečno obdobje za sklenitev pogodbe 13 mesecev, kar je daljše od obdobja štirih mesecev pod petim okvirnim programom; glede na sedmi okvirni program poziva Komisijo, naj izkoristi obstoječa upravna orodja (na primer osebne identifikacijske kode in pooblaščene zastopnike pravnih subjektov (LEAR));
; deplores the fact that the time to contract averages 13 months, representing an increase of four months compared to the FP5; with a view to the FP7, demands that the Commission make use of existing administrative tools (e.g. Personal Identification Codes (PICs) and Legal Entity Appointed Representatives (LEARs));
je nezadovoljen, da šesti okvirni program ni dosegel cilja močnejšega sodelovanja z zasebnimi udeleženci, zlasti z malimi in srednjimi podjetji; se strinja s Sodiščem, da so nekatere določbe dejansko odvračale njihovo sodelovanje; na splošno meni, da so pravne določbe in pravila (tudi modeli pogodb in smernice) prezapleteni in sami ovirajo učinkovito in uspešno izvajanje raziskovalnih politik;
Is dissatisfied that the FP6 did not attain the objective of stronger participation of private participants, in particular SMEs; shares the Court's view that some provisions actively discouraged their participation; on the whole, takes the view that the legal provisions and rules (including model contracts and guidelines) are excessively complex and in themselves clog up the effective and efficient implementation of research policies;
opaža, da se ocenjevanje osredotoča na pregled vnosa in ne na oceno rezultatov; se strinja z mnenjem Sodišča, da je bistveni element za določanje napredka in morebitnega uspeha ustrezna opredelitev posebnih, merljivih, dosegljivih, ustreznih in časovno določenih ciljev (cilji SMART); poudarja, da morajo biti zahteve o poročanju oblikovane kot namerno orodje za spremljanje in ocenjevanje napredka glede integracije in vsebine Ocenjevalno poročilo, str.
Observes that the focus of evaluations is placed on ‘input’ checks rather than output assessments; shares the Court's view that the proper definition of specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed (SMART) objectives at the outset of the project is a key element for the purposes of determining its progress and eventual success; stresses that reporting requirements have to be designed as a purposeful tool for monitoring and assessing progress in the integration and material progress ER, p.
, ne smejo pa biti uporabljene za sankcioniranje drugih diskrecijskih poslovodnih dejavnosti koordinatorjev ali za vmešavanje vanje, če so te v skladu s pravnimi določbami;
and must not be used as a means of sanctioning or interfering with the coordinator's other discretionary managerial activities as long as they are in line with the legal provisions;
obžaluje, da v večini primerov trajnostna integracija po začetnem obdobju financiranja ni bila dosežena in da Sodišče ocenjuje, da se je začetno obdobje financiranja petih let izkazalo za neuresničljivo; podpira predlog za uporabo konkurenčnih in izbirnih meril za podaljšano financiranje mrež odličnosti, ki naj bi bile zmožne doseči samostojnost Ocenjevalno poročilo, str.
Regrets that in most cases sustainable integration extending beyond the initial funding period could not be achieved and that, in the Court's assessment, the initial funding period of five years proved to be unrealistic; supports the proposal to apply highly competitive and selective criteria to the prolonged funding of NoEs that claim to be able to achieve self-sustainability ER, p.
se je z zanimanjem seznanil s predlogom skupine strokovnjakov o preučitvi možnosti koordiniranih razpisov med shemo ERA-NET in sedmim okvirnim programom z združevanjem nacionalnih sredstev in sredstev Skupnosti Ocenjevalno poročilo, str.
Notes with interest the expert group's proposal to explore the possibility of coordinated calls between ERA-NETs and the FP7 combining national and Community funds ER, p.
, pa tudi z vsemi ukrepi za povečanje preglednosti in dostopnosti baze podatkov CORDIS, da bi zagotovili izmenjavo rezultatov raziskav v evropskem raziskovalnem prostoru (izmenjava najboljših praks);
as well as all measures to enhance the transparency and accessibility of the CORDIS database so as to ensure an exchange of research results in the ERA (exchange of best practice examples);
je zelo zaskrbljen, ker je uporaba revizijske strategije Komisije za šesti okvirni program pripeljala do dveh postopkov na sodišču, ki sta jih sprožila nekdanja udeleženca; poudarja, da je zanesljivost podlaga za dolgoročno sodelovanje, in zopet poziva Komisijo, naj za zagotovitev pravne gotovosti ne izvede ponovnega izračunavanja računovodskih izkazov za projekte iz šestega okvirnega programa, ki jih je že odobrila in poravnala z uporabo novih tolmačenj meril upravičenosti za stroške, določene v splošnih pogojih (Priloga II) vzorca pogodbe iz šestega okvirnega programa Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 23. aprila 2009 s pripombami, ki je sestavni del sklepov o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007, Oddelek III – Komisija in izvajalske agencije (UL L 255, 26.9.2009, str.
Is deeply concerned by the fact that the application of the Commission's audit strategy for the FP6 has already resulted in two court cases initiated by former participants; stresses that reliability is the basis for any long-term cooperation and calls once again on the Commission, with a view to ensuring legal certainty, to refrain from recalculating the financial statements of projects under the FP6 that it has already approved and settled, by applying new interpretations to the eligibility criteria for costs established in the General Conditions (Annex II) of the FP6 model contract Resolution of the European Parliament of 23 April 2009 with observations forming an integral part of the Decision on discharge in respect of the implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2007, Section III – Commission and executive agencies (JO L 255, 26.9.2009, p.
; poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi svoja prizadevanja za rešitev, zlasti s poenostavitvijo postopkov izterjave z uporabo primernih pavšalnih postopkov in z upoštevanjem dobre vere in upravičenih pričakovanj upravičencev; si želi dialog, ki bo temeljil na iskanju rešitve;
; urges the Commission to reinforce its efforts to find a solution, in particular by simplifying the recovery procedures through the use of appropriate flat-rate procedures and taking into account the good faith and legitimate expectations of beneficiaries, and expresses its desire for a solution-based dialogue;
poziva Komisijo, naj poišče rešitev za zagotovitev zanesljivosti in srednjeročno trajnost pri izvajanju in načrtovanju okvirnih programov, predvsem v povezavi z osmim okvirnim programom, predvsem pa naj se enotno uporabi določene roke in stroge poslovnike;
Asks the Commission to find solutions that ensure reliability and mid-term continuity in the implementation and planning of framework programmes, notably with a view to the FP8, and, in particular, to homogeneously apply fixed deadlines and firm rules of procedure;
Posebno poročilo št. 9/2009 o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti dejavnosti Evropskega urada za izbor osebja v zvezi z izbiranjem osebja
Special report No 9/2009 on the efficiency and effectiveness of the personnel selection activities carried out by the European Personnel Selection Office
poziva Evropski urad za izbor osebja (EPSO), naj v svojem razvojnem programu upošteva priporočila Sodišča;
Encourages the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) to take into account the Court's recommendations in its Development Programme (EDP);
meni, da bi morali urad EPSO in vse institucije EU izboljšati svojo komunikacijo z državljani o pojmu nepristranske evropske javne službe in izboljšati podobo EU kot delodajalke;
Takes the view that EPSO and all EU institutions should improve their communication to citizens about the concept of an impartial European civil service and should enhance the image of the EU as an employer;
glede tega poudarja, da mora urad EPSO stremeti k izboljšanju komuniciranja z javnimi upravami v državah članicah za izmenjavo najboljših praks na področju zagotavljanja informacij javnosti in oglaševanja ter ciljnega promoviranja možnosti zaposlitve tako, da bodo zanje izvedeli poklicni strokovnjaki; meni, da bi bilo podobno komuniciranje potrebno tudi s pomembnimi mednarodnimi organizacijami;
Points out in this context that EPSO should also aim at improving its communication with the public administrations in the Member States in order to exchange best practices in the areas of the provision of information/advertising to the public and of promoting job opportunities in a targeted manner so as to bring them to the attention of professionals; considers that similar communication should be undertaken with relevant international organisations;
je prepričan, da bi boljše sodelovanje z univerzami dolgoročno koristilo, saj bi institucije EU dobile zaželeno osebje, diplomirani študentje pa bi imeli več možnih poklicnih poti;
Is convinced that improving cooperation with universities could be beneficial in the long term by, on the one hand, providing the EU institutions with desirable employees and, on the other hand, by assisting graduates in enhancing their career options;
spodbuja urad EPSO, naj si še naprej prizadeva za analizo in preprečevanje geografskih neravnovesij med kandidati in posledično med uspešnimi kandidati;
Encourages EPSO to continue its efforts to diagnose and prevent the geographical imbalances amongst candidates and subsequently among the laureates;
obžaluje, da Sodišče v svojem poročilu in tudi urad EPSO nista dovolj analizirala procesa zaposlovanja srednjega in višjega vodstvenega osebja in zlasti geografskih neravnovesij na tem področju; predlaga, naj Sodišče v svojem naslednjem posebnem poročilu (ali poročilu o nadaljnjih ukrepih) analizira to področje;
Regrets that neither the Courts‘ report nor EPSO sufficiently analyses the process of recruitment of middle and higher-management personnel, and in particular the geographical imbalances in this field; suggests that in its next special report (or follow-up report) the Court should analyse this issue;
meni, da mora urad EPSO izboljšati upravljanje čakalnih list uspešnih kandidatov, tako da jim zagotovi informacije o prostih mestih, da bi jim omogočil njihovo končno zaposlitev; hkrati meni, da je treba skrajšati obdobje, ko uspešni kandidati čakajo na zaposlitev;
Takes the view that EPSO should improve the administration of the laureates‘ waiting lists by providing them with information on current vacancies in order to facilitate their final recruitment; at the same time, considers that efforts should be made to reduce the time spent by successful candidates waiting for employment;
ni prepričan, da je napotitev uradnikov iz institucij EU na urad EPSO, kjer sodelujejo kot stalni člani izbirne komisije, realistična in stroškovno učinkovita izbira;
Is not convinced that secondment of officials from the EU institutions to EPSO to serve as full-time selection board members is a realistic and cost-efficient option;
poziva urad EPSO, naj prepreči vse nejasnosti v obvestilih o razpisu in naj pregleda svoje postopke za preverjanje skladnosti s pogoji za upravičenost;
Calls on EPSO to avoid any ambiguity in competition notices and encourages EPSO to review its procedures for verifying compliance with eligibility requirements;
prav tako poziva urad EPSO, naj izboljša svoje postopke za pritožbo, na primer z določitvijo različnih žirij za prvo in drugo stopnjo;
Also calls on EPSO to improve its appeal procedures, e.g. by assigning different panels in the first and second instance;
je seznanjen s tem, da je na Sodišču za uslužbence več odprtih zadev proti uradu EPSO v povezavi z neuspešnimi izbirnimi postopki (predvsem na področju jezikov); meni, da se mora urad EPSO po zaključku teh zadev iz njih naučiti in jih vključiti v razvojni program;
Notes that there are several cases pending against EPSO before the Civil Service Tribunal in connection with failures in the selection procedure (in particular on the issue of languages); takes the view that, once these cases are concluded, they should provide lessons to be learned and should be incorporated into the EDP by EPSO;
obžaluje, da veljavni sistem ne omogoča ocene učinkovitosti ukrepov in da je, tudi če se bo izkazalo, da ima politika pozitivni učinek, to težko izmerljivo zaradi pomanjkanja posebnih ciljev, izrecne strategije in primernih kazalnikov;
Regrets that the system in place does not make it possible to gauge the effectiveness of the measures and that, even if the impact of the policy proves to be positive, it is very difficult to measure it due to the lack of specific objectives, explicit strategy and appropriate indicators;
poziva Komisijo, naj opredeli politične cilje ob upoštevanju potrebe po doslednosti med navedenimi ambicijami in predvidenim proračunom; ti cilji morajo biti posebni, merljivi, dosegljivi, ustrezni in časovno določeni, hkrati pa naj tudi opredeli in spremlja primerne kazalce uspešnosti;
Urges the Commission to specify the policy objectives, bearing in mind the need for consistency between stated ambitions and the committed budget, and to express these objectives in a SMART way, as well as to define and monitor suitable performance indicators;
poziva Komisijo na še izboljša izbirni postopek, zlasti z ohranitvijo zahteve po vključitvi informacij o pričakovanem učinku zadevnih ukrepov in kako se bo ta učinek meril;
Calls on the Commission to continue the improvements to the selection procedure, in particular by maintaining the requirement to include in proposals information concerning the expected impact of the measures in question and on the manner in which that impact will be gauged;
poziva države članice, naj prispevajo k izboljšanju izbirnega postopka, tako da preverjajo ustreznost predlogov in povečajo selektivnost; države članice tudi spodbuja, naj Komisiji posredujejo informacije o svoji nacionalni pomoči in ukrepih za promocijo;
Calls on the Member States to contribute to improvement of the selection procedure by verifying the relevance of the proposals and by increasing selectivity; also encourages the Member States to communicate to the Commission information on their national promotion aids and measures;
poziva države članice, naj izboljšajo postopke javnih razpisov, ki jih uporabljajo pri izbiri izvedbenih organov, za preprečitev zelo kratkih rokov pa naj predvsem sistematično uporabljajo uradne postopke in zagotovijo, da organizacije predlagateljice upoštevajo izbirne pogoje;
Calls on the Members States to improve the public procurement procedures used by them when selecting the implementing bodies and, in particular, to avoid very tight deadlines, to apply formal procedures systematically and to ensure that proposing organisations comply with the terms of selection;
ugotavlja, da je nadzor in upravljanje projektov LIFE-Nature zapleten proces in da vključuje različne interesne skupine iz držav članic; vendar kljub temu ugotavlja, da obseg dodeljenih finančnih sredstev zahteva zagotovilo, da so naložbe stroškovno učinkovite in trajnostne;
Notes that the supervision and management of LIFE-Nature is a complex process and involves various stakeholders from the Member States; however, notes that the amount of financial resources allocated requires assurance that the investments made are cost-efficient and sustainable;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno pregleda svoj model izbire, da bi oblikovala predloge prednostnih projektov LIFE-Nature, za katere je možno zagotoviti kontinuiteto rezultatov; poleg tega Komisiji predlaga, naj razmisli o ločitvi upravljanja sklopov „narava“ in „okolje“;
Invites the Commission to review its selection model in order to prioritise LIFE-Nature project proposals which can provide an assurance as to the continuity of results; also suggests to the Commission that it consider separating the management of the ‘Nature’ and ‘Environment’ strands;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri določanju ustreznih meril in kazalnikov za izbor predlogov, kar zadeva njihovo trajnost, tesno sodeluje z Evropsko agencijo za okolje in Evropskim tematskim centrom za biotsko raznovrstnost in naj prevzame potrebno pobudo za izboljšanje spremljanja projektov v povezavi z doseženimi rezultati ter oblikuje ustrezne kazalnike in merila za spremljanje rezultatov projektov;
Urges the Commission to cooperate closely with the European Environmental Agency and the European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity in defining the appropriate criteria and indicators for the selection of proposals as regards their sustainability as well as to take the necessary initiatives to improve project monitoring in respect of the results achieved, and to develop appropriate indicators and criteria for monitoring project outcomes;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno pregleda svojo strategijo komuniciranja in se pri tem posveti zlasti razširjanju ustreznih informacij in pridobljenih izkušenj ter zagotovi, da bodo upravičenci morali predložiti več tehničnih podrobnosti o uporabljenih metodah, pridobljenih izkušnjah in najboljših praksah;
Invites the Commission to review its communication strategy, paying particular attention to the dissemination of relevant information and lessons learned, and to ensure that beneficiaries are required to provide more technical details concerning the methods used, lessons learned and best practices identified;
poziva države članice, ki so same odgovorne za trajnostno ohranjanje narave, naj tesno sodelujejo s Komisijo in preostalimi državami članicami ter poskusijo izmenjevati najboljšo prakso pri upravljanju projektov LIFE-Nature;
Calls on Member States, being themselves responsible for sustainable nature conservation, to cooperate closely with the Commission and with other Member States with a view to exchanging best practices for the management of LIFE-Nature projects;
poziva Komisijo, naj uvede shemo za nadaljnje spremljanje financiranja LIFE, da bi ocenila učinkovitost financiranih projektov in zagotovila trajnostni učinek financiranja EU tudi po zaključku projektov;
Calls on the Commission to introduce a follow-up scheme for post-LIFE funding in order to assess the effectiveness of the projects financed and to ensure the sustainability impact of the EU funding after the closure of the projects;
poziva Komisijo, naj razvije ustrezne ukrepe za rešitev obstoječih pravnih vprašanj in ovir pri izvajanju, povezanih z dolgoročnim spremljanjem projektov;
Calls on the Commission to develop appropriate measures to resolve the existing legal issues and implementation constraints regarding the long-term follow-up of the projects;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je Komisija za razliko od prejšnjih pristopnih programov začela ukvarjati s pomembnimi strukturnimi reformami na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev v zgodnejši fazi procesa širitve, in meni, da je taka prednostna obravnava zelo pozitivna; v povezavi s tem vztraja, da mora Komisija svojo pomoč na Zahodnem Balkanu še naprej usmerjati na pravosodje in notranje zadeve in nadaljevati s svojimi prizadevanji;
Notices with satisfaction that, unlike in previous accession programmes, the Commission attempted to tackle important structural reforms in the area of justice and home affairs earlier in the enlargement process, and finds this prioritisation very positive; insists in this context that the Commission must continue to focus its assistance for the Western Balkans on the justice and home affairs sector, so as to carry on with those efforts;
poudarja, da Komisija zagotavlja upravljanje projektov na področju pravosodja in notranjih zadev v težkem političnem in institucionalnem ozračju; ob upoštevanju zaključkov Računskega sodišča, ki kažejo, da so bili naložbeni projekti uspešnejši od projektov vzpostavljanja institucij, od Komisije pričakuje znatno okrepitev povezave med projekti, namenjenimi okrepitvi institucionalnih zmogljivosti, in naložbenimi projekti v tej regiji;
Recalls that the Commission ensures the management of projects in the field of justice and home affairs in a difficult political and institutional environment; taking into consideration the Court's conclusions showing that the investment projects were more successful than the institution-building projects, expects from the Commission a significant strengthening of the link between projects aimed at the reinforcement of institutional capacities and investment projects in the region concerned;