natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu redno in ves čas nevarnosti pandemije poroča o epidemiološkem razvoju aviarne gripe, znanstvenem napredku pri zdravilih in cepivih ter o ravni pripravljenosti Unije in držav članic;
Calls on the Commission to submit to the European Parliament and the Council, at regular intervals and for as long as the risk of a pandemic lasts, a report on the epidemiological developments of the avian pandemic, new scientific advances in drugs and vaccines, and the level of preparedness in the Union and the Member States;
poudarja, da ima Evropska unija utemeljen razlog, da priskrbi tehnično, znanstveno in gospodarsko pomoč že prizadetim državam, zlasti pa, da prispeva k večji vsesplošni ozaveščenosti ter k izdelavi splošnega svetovnega načrta, ki bi bil usklajen na mednarodni, regionalni, podregionalni in nacionalni ravni z ustreznim načrtom in časovnim razporedom, ki ga podprejo mednarodne in regionalne organizacije, pa tudi nacionalne vlade;
Points out that the European Union has a legitimate reason to provide technical, scientific and economic assistance to countries already affected and in particular to contribute to raising global awareness and to a global master plan coordinated at international, regional, sub-regional and national levels, with a proper road map and timetable, to be endorsed by international and regional organisations as well as by national governments;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v tesnem sodelovanju s sosednjimi državami in Svetovno zdravstveno organizacijo v Evropi zagotovijo, da so nadzorni sistemi in sistemi za ukrepanje v nujnih primerih v državah članicah polno razviti in da jih učinkovito izvajajo;
Urges the Commission and the Member States to work closely with neighbouring states and WHO Europe to ensure that neighbouring states' monitoring and emergency response systems are fully developed and effectively implemented;
poziva Evropsko unijo, naj si v mednarodnih telesih prizadeva za podelitev resničnih pooblastil Svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji za preiskavo in nadzor pri epizootijah in pandemijah v vseh državah sveta;
Calls on the European Union to seek, through international bodies, the conferral of a genuine power of inquiry and monitoring on WHO regarding epizootics and pandemics in all countries in the world;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic in Svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji.
Instructs it President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Member States' governments and the WHO.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (C-176/03 Komisija proti Svetu) ( 2006/2007(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the consequences of the judgment of the Court of 13 September 2005 (C-176/03 Commission v Council) ( 2006/2007(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 10 Pogodbe ES in člena 47 Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Article 10 of the EC Treaty and Article 47 of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 5 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 5 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 3. septembra 2003 z naslovom "Pravne podlage in upoštevanje prava Skupnosti" UL C 76 E, 25.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 3 September 2003 on legal bases and compliance with Community law OJ C 76 E, 25.3.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu z dne 23. novembra 2005 o posledicah sodbe Sodišča z dne 13. septembra 2005 (C-176/03 Komisija/Svet), ( KOM(2005)0583 ),
having regard to the communication of 23 November 2005 from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implications of the Court's judgment of 13 September 2005 (Case C-176/03 Commission v Council) (COM 2005)0583),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0172/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0172/2006 ),
ker organi Skupnosti skrbijo predvsem za učinkovito izvajanje predpisov prava Skupnosti, kar predstavlja temeljno obveznost držav članic, določeno s členom 10 Pogodbe ES,
whereas the effective implementation of Community law is one of the main concerns of the Community institutions and a fundamental obligation of the Member States, as laid down in Article 10 of the EC Treaty,
ker je v teku desetletij izgradnja Evrope pripomogla k vzpostavitvi skupnega pravnega prostora, znotraj katerega so se nacionalni pravni redi in evropski pravni red postopoma prepletli v novo in neodvisno tvorbo, ki ne temelji le na skupnih vrednotah, temveč tudi na načelih, ki dajejo prednost pravu Skupnosti in sodelovanju v dobri veri med državami članicami in evropskimi institucijami (člen 10 Pogodbe ES),
whereas over the decades the construction of Europe has brought with it the establishment of a common judicial area, within which the national and European legal systems have gradually become intertwined, forming an independent structure based not only on shared values, but also on the principles of the primacy of Community law and cooperation in good faith between the Member States and the Community institutions (Article 10 of the EC Treaty),
ker za vsak ukrep Skupnosti velja načelo subsidiarnosti, določeno v členu 5 Pogodbe ES,
whereas any action taken by the Community must accord with the subsidiarity principle laid down in Article 5 of the EC Treaty,
ker je sodna praksa Sodišča večkrat določila, da lahko ukrepi, potrebni za zagotovitev učinkovite uporabe prava Skupnosti, vključujejo kazenske sankcije,
whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice has repeatedly established that the measures required to ensure the effective implementation of Community law may involve criminal penalties,
ker lahko načeli primarnosti prava Skupnosti in sodelovanja v dobri veri vplivata na nacionalno kazensko zakonodajo držav članic, če so te dolžne v skladu s sodno prakso Sodišča:
whereas the principles of the primacy of Community law and sincere cooperation can affect the national criminal legislation of the Member States in so far as the latter are obliged, in accordance with the case-law of the Court of Justice:
, odstavek 36: "določbe, ki jih morajo države članice sprejeti [...], da se izognejo [...] morajo predvideti, da takšna oblika oglaševanja pomeni kršenje zakonodaje, ki je kaznivo dejanje, to pa narekuje sankcije, ki bodo imele odvračilen učinek"),
, paragraph 36: "the measures which the Member States are required to take […] in order to prevent […] must provide that such advertisements constitute a breach of the law and, in particular, a criminal offence punishable by penalties having a deterrent effect"),
ker je sodna praksa Sodišča razjasnila predvsem pravni osnovi, ki se uporabljata za prvi in tretji steber, vendar je bila v bistvu zanikana pristojnost evropskega zakonodajalca na kazenskem področju in na področju kazenskega postopka,
whereas the case-law of the Court of Justice has primarily served to clarify which legal bases applied under the first and the third pillar while establishing that, in fact, the European legislature had no competence in relation to criminal matters or criminal procedural law,
zlasti, ker je v zadevi C-176/03, kljub izključitvi splošne pristojnosti Evropske skupnosti na kazenskem področju, Sodišče potrdilo, da to ne more ovirati zakonodajalca Skupnosti, ko dejanske, sorazmerne in odvračilne kazenske sankcije pristojnih nacionalnih organov pomenijo potreben ukrep za boj proti hudim okoljskim kršitvam, da sprejme ukrepe v povezavi s kazenskim pravom držav članic, za katere meni, da so potrebni za zagotavljanje polne učinkovitosti norm, ki jih določa na področju varstva okolja,
whereas, in particular, in Case C-176/03, the Court of Justice, while finding that, as a general rule, criminal matters did not fall within the Community's competence, stated that that did not prevent the Community legislature, when the application of effective, proportionate and dissuasive criminal penalties by the competent national authorities was an essential measure for combating serious environmental offences, from taking measures which related to the criminal law of the Member States which it considered necessary in order to ensure that the rules which it laid down on environmental protection were fully effective,
ker se je treba, glede na stalno prakso sodišča, za pravilno določitev pravne podlage akta Skupnosti, nanašati na cilj in vsebino samega akta, in ker so posledično, v skladu s členi Pogodbe EU od vključno 29 dalje, akti, sprejeti v okviru naslova VI Pogodbe EU, nezakoniti, če bi lahko, zaradi svojega cilja in vsebine, temeljili na Pogodbi ES,
whereas, in accordance with settled case-law, in order to ensure that a Community act is adopted on the correct legal basis, the aim and content of the act itself must be taken into account and consequently, pursuant to Articles 29 et seq. of the EU Treaty, acts adopted under Title VI of the EU Treaty are unlawful if, by virtue of their aim and content, they could instead have been based on the EC Treaty,
ker je predmet sodbe v zadevi C-176/03 omejen na kazenske zadeve, povezane z varstvom okolja, ki je ena glavnih nalog Skupnosti, kakor določata člena 2 in 3 Pogodbe ES,
whereas the subject of the judgment in Case C-176/03 is limited to criminal matters relating to protection of the environment, which is one of the main tasks of the Community, as specified in Articles 2 and 3 of the EC Treaty,
ker bi bilo treba zato sodbo v zadevi C-176/03 obravnavati previdno ter jo uporabiti od primera do primera na področjih, ki sodijo v okvir glavnih načel, ciljev in pristojnosti Skupnosti,
whereas the judgement in Case C-176/03 should therefore be considered with caution and applied on a case-by-case basis to those fields that are among the main principles, objectives and competences of the Community,
ker je v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu Komisija želela razširiti sklepe Sodišča in šteti za nezakonite kazenske določbe, sprejete v okviru naslova VI Pogodbe EU tudi v odnosu do drugih področij pristojnosti Skupnosti in ne le tistih, povezanih z okoljsko politiko,
whereas, in the abovementioned communication, the Commission sought to extend the conclusions of the Court of Justice, also regarding as unlawful criminal provisions adopted under Title VI of the EU Treaty relating to other areas of Community competence, and not just those relating to environmental policy,
ker ekstenzivna razlaga področja uporabe sodbe v zadevi C-176/03 ni avtomatična,
whereas there appear to be no grounds for an automatic presumption in favour of a broad interpretation of the judgment,
ker Komisija meni tudi, da v veljavni zakonodaji morda obstajajo akti, ki temeljijo na naslovu VI Pogodbe EU, katerih pravna podlaga se v luči sodbe v zadevi C-176/03, kakor si jo v razširjeni obliki razlaga sama Komisija, šteje za napačno,
whereas furthermore, according to the Commission, current legislation may include acts based on Title VI of the EU Treaty whose legal basis should be regarded as incorrect in the light of the judgment in Case C-176/03, according to the broad interpretation of that judgment adopted by the Commission,
ker Komisija namerava, da bi preprečila razveljavitev zadevne zakonodaje in zagotovila pravno varnost, na različne načine poseči v veljavno zakonodajo in v še ne izvajane pobude,
whereas, in order to avert the need to annul the legislation in question and in order to ensure legal certainty, the Commission proposes to take various measures in relation to existing legislation and pending proposals,
ker je vprašanje zakonite vključitve kazenskih določb v zakonodajo, sprejeto na podlagi prvega stebra EU, pomembno in predstavlja nadaljnji korak v razvoju zakonodaje Skupnosti,
having regard to the importance of the question of the legitimacy of including criminal provisions in legislation adopted under the first pillar of the EU, as a further stage in the development of Community law,
ker ima Parlament vlogo vodilne sile v okviru razvoja prava Skupnosti in je tisti, ki skupaj z drugimi evropskimi institucijami opravlja zakonodajno funkcijo, ki jo ima na podlagi demokratične izvolitve kot predstavnik ljudi Evrope, zlasti kadar se sprejema zakonodaja, ki bi lahko vplivala na temeljne svoboščine državljanov,
having regard to Parliament's role as the driving force behind the development of Community law, one it carries out, together with the other European institutions, as the legislative body invested with democratic authority as the representative of the peoples of Europe, in particular when laws which could affect citizens' fundamental freedoms are to be adopted,
ker tudi v okviru pravnega sistema Evropske unije načelo zakonitosti kaznivih dejanj in kazni predstavlja neodtujljivo zagotovilo za varovanje osebne svobode in izvajanje vseh pooblastil veže na zakon, tudi pri izbiri dejanj, ki jih je treba kaznovati, in predvidenih kazni,
whereas, in the context of the European Union's legal system also, the principle of the supremacy of the rule of law in criminal matters is an irremovable safeguard designed to protect individual liberty and make any exercise of power subject to the law, for example when determining which actions are punishable and what penalties should be imposed,
pozdravlja sodbo v zadevi C-176/03, ker je razjasnila, da se je za natančno določitev pravne podlage nekega akta treba nanašati na cilj in vsebino samega akta, kar posledično razveljavi okvirni sklep na področju varstva okolja, ki je bil napačno utemeljen na podlagi tretjega namesto prvega stebra;
Welcomes the judgment in Case C-176/03, which made it clear that the legal basis on which acts are adopted must be selected by reference to the aim and content of the act itself, and consequently annulled a framework decision on environmental protection which had been mistakenly adopted under the third, rather than the first, pillar;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da na osnovi tega vodila Sodišče poudarja možnost, da na področju varstva okolja evropski zakonodajalec v okviru prvega stebra sprejme kazenske določbe, potrebne za zagotovitev polne učinkovitosti norm, ki izhajajo iz istega stebra;
Is pleased that the Court of Justice, on the basis of that finding, confirms that the European legislature may adopt, under the first pillar, any criminal provisions necessary to ensure that the rules laid down under that pillar - in this instance, on environmental protection - are fully effective;
poziva Komisijo, naj ne razširi avtomatično sklepov Sodišča na vsa ostala možna področja iz prvega stebra;
Urges the Commission not to automatically extend the conclusions of the Court of Justice to every other field falling within the scope of the first pillar;
ponovno opozarja na nujno potrebo, da se v skladu s členom 42 Pogodbe EU začne postopek za vključitev pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah v steber Skupnosti, ki edini zagotavlja pogoje za sprejem evropskih določb ob polnem spoštovanju demokratičnih načel in učinkovitega odločanja ter ob ustreznem sodnem nadzoru;
Reiterates, yet again, the urgent need to start the procedure, using Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union, for inclusion of judicial and police cooperation on criminal matters in the Community pillar, which alone provides the conditions for adopting European provisions in full compliance with the principles of democracy and efficient decision-making and under appropriate judicial control;
meni, da je v pričakovanju te spremembe nujno določiti usklajeno politično strategijo pri uporabi kazenskih sankcij v evropski zakonodaji; ponovno opozarja, da morajo biti sprejete kazenske določbe med seboj usklajene ne glede na njihovo pravno podlago ali "steber", v katerega spadajo; poleg tega obžaluje, da so na koncu prav evropski državljani žrtev ločevanja na Skupnost in Unijo, ki smo mu priča na tem področju;
Takes the view that, pending this measure, there is an urgent need to define a coherent political strategy with regard to the application of criminal sanctions in European law; recalls that the criminal-law provisions adopted must also be internally coherent, whatever the legal basis or "pillar" on which they are based; considers it regrettable, moreover, that European citizens are, in the final analysis, the victims of the prevailing dichotomy between the Community and the Union in this sphere;
meni, da na tem področju strategija znotraj obstoječih stebrov zahteva:
Takes the view that an inter-pillar strategy in this area calls for:
zelo tesno sodelovanje med institucijami Unije ter med njimi in državami članicami,
very close cooperation between the Union's institutions and between the latter and the Member States,
določeno prožnost pri določitvi narave in področja uporabe sankcij v izogib kazenskemu "dumpingu" in za spodbujanje sodelovanja med sodnimi organi,
a certain flexibility in the definition of the nature and scope of the sanctions, in order to avoid penal "dumping" and to foster cooperation between the judicial authorities,
uvedbo strukturiranih oblik sodelovanja med sodnimi organi, medsebojnega ocenjevanja in zbiranja zanesljivih in primerljivih informacij o vplivu določb kazenskega prava, temelječih na evropskih zakonih;
the introduction of structured forms of cooperation between judicial authorities, of mutual evaluation and of the collection of reliable, comparable information on the impact of criminal-law provisions based on European laws;
poudarja, da je prav tako pomembno, da se spoštuje pravno ravnovesje, doseženo v kazenskih zadevah na nacionalni ravni, poziva k razvoju uravnoteženega pristopa k vključevanju kazenskih določb, ki bi zagotavljale učinkovitost prava Skupnosti, v besedila Skupnosti ne glede na naravo teh določb in ob tem poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju z nacionalnimi parlamenti; poziva Komisijo, da v sodelovanju z Eurojustom in Evropsko pravosodno mrežo vzpostavi sisteme povratnega informiranja o uporabi kazenskih sankcij, predvidenih z evropskimi ukrepi, v državah članicah; pozdravlja pobudo vrhovnih sodišč držav članic, da vzpostavijo spletno povezavo, prek katere bi razpravljala o temah skupnega interesa, povezanih z dejavnostmi Evropske unije, vključno o soobstoju evropskih in nacionalnih določb kazenskega prava;
stresses that it is important also to respect the judicial balance achieved at the national level in penal matters; calls for the development of a measured approach to incorporating into Community texts the penal provisions necessary to ensure the effectiveness of Community law, whatever their nature, and calls in this context for closer cooperation with the national parliaments; invites the Commission, in collaboration with Eurojust and the European Judicial Network, to put in place feed-back systems on the application in the Member States of the criminal-law sanctions provided for in European measures; welcomes the initiative taken by the supreme courts of the Member States in meeting on-line to discuss subjects of common interest linked to the activities of the European Union, including the coexistence of European and national criminal-law provisions;
se strinja s Komisijo, da je treba umakniti ali spremeniti še ne izvajane zakonodajne ukrepe, osnovane na pravni podlagi, ki se v luči sodbe v zadevi C-176/03 šteje za napačno;
Agrees with the Commission on the need to withdraw or amend pending legislative proposals whose legal basis is to be regarded as incorrect in the light of the Court's judgment in Case C-176/03;
se strinja s Komisijo glede možnosti, da se določijo nove pravne podlage, osnovane na Pogodbi ES, za dele zakonodajo, ki so bili sprejeti v okviru tretjega stebra in ki se mora v luči sodbe v zadevi C-176/03 šteti kot nezakonita, kakor tudi glede možnosti, da se v ta namen ponovno sproži zakonodajni proces o takih novih pravnih podlagah;
Agrees with the Commission that it is necessary to find a new legal basis in the EC Treaty for pieces of legislation that have already been adopted under the third pillar and that, in the light of the judgment in Case C-176/03, must be regarded as unlawful, and to remedy the situation by reopening the legislative procedure on the new legal basis;
poziva Komisijo, naj za pregled ne uporabi splošnega in nedoločenega načina, ampak naj ponovno obravnava vsak posamezni akt, ki ga je sama opredelila, od primera do primera, da bi tako zagotovila poglobljeno analizo in pravilno določitev pravne podlage za uporabo v konkretnem primeru;
Calls on the Commission to review on a case-by-case basis the acts it has identified , instead of adopting an undifferentiated, across-the-board approach, in order to ensure that, after careful consideration, the correct legal basis is chosen in each individual case;
poziva Komisijo, da uporabi sodbo Sodišča na področjih, ki sodijo v okvir glavnih načel, ciljev in pristojnosti Skupnosti, in da jo uporabi previdno od primera do primera in vedno v sodelovanju s Svetom in Parlamentom;
Asks the Commission to apply the judgment of the Court of Justice to those fields that are among the main principles, objectives and competences of the Community and to apply it with caution on a case-by-case basis and always in cooperation with the Council and the European Parliament;
opozarja Komisijo, da ponovno obravnavanje veljavnih zakonodajnih aktov, da bi po potrebi z neposrednimi predlogi popravili njihovo pravno podlago, pri čemer vsebina ostane nespremenjena, ne more odvzeti Parlamentu pravice do izvajanja svoje neodtujljive vloge so-zakonodajalca, in s tem žrtvovati demokratični prispevek, ki ga evropski integraciji zagotavlja Parlament kot predstavniški dom, ki ga neposredno izvolijo državljani;
11 Reminds the Commission that reviewing the legislation in force, and possibly submitting proposals designed to rectify the legal basis while leaving the substance of the legislation unchanged, must not involve depriving Parliament of its inalienable role as co-legislator and thus sacrificing the democratic input provided by Parliament, the elected body representing European citizens, in the process of European integration;
nasprotuje medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu, zaradi katerega bi se moral Parlament odpovedati ščitenju svojih pravic;
Opposes any interinstitutional agreement that would oblige Parliament to abdicate the exercise of its rights;
I-651, odstavek 61, in citirana sodna praksa.
[2004] ECR I-651, paragraph 61, and the case-law cited therein.
se strinja s Komisijo, ki meni, da je treba vsako uporabo ukrepov v zvezi s kazenskim pravom utemeljiti s potrebo po učinkoviti zadevni politiki Skupnosti in mora spoštovati medsebojno skladnost celotnega kazenskega sistema; meni namreč, da načeloma odgovornost za pravilno uporabo zakonodaje Skupnosti dejansko nosijo države članice;
Shares the Commission's view that any recourse to measures relating to the criminal law must be motivated by the need to give effect to the Community policy in question and must respect the internal consistency of the criminal law; considers that, as a general principle, it is the Member States which are responsible for the due application of Community law;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva, da morajo biti predpostavke o vključitvi kazenskih določb v pri steber jasne in določujoče; da se take predpostavke pojavljajo samo, če spoštovanja predpisov Skupnosti ni možno zagotoviti drugače kot s kazenskimi sankcijami; zlasti se je treba prepričati, da je bilo veliko kršitev predpisov Skupnosti, ki so se ponavljale in jih ni bilo možno preprečiti z veljavno zakonodajo, tudi z uporabo zakonodaje posameznih držav članic;
Asks the Commission to bear in mind that the requisite conditions for including criminal provisions under the first pillar must be clear and determined in advance; that those requisite conditions are fulfilled only where it is not possible to ensure compliance with Community law except by recourse to criminal penalties; in particular, it is necessary to ascertain that there have been frequent and repeated infringements of Community law which it has not proved possible to stop by means of the legislation in force, even by invoking the law of individual Member States;