natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/other-resources/mind-the-gap-an-analysis-of-the-mediterranean-bluefin-trade-85899364820 , kjer so bili uporabljeni trgovinski dokumenti, kaže, da je trgovina z modroplavutim tunom v letu 2010 obsegala več kot 32.000 ton, medtem ko je bil celotni dovoljeni ulov v letu 2010 13.500 ton.
http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/other-resources/mind-the-gap-an-analysis-of-the-mediterranean-bluefin-trade-85899364820 uses trade documents to estimate that over 32.000 tonnes of bluefin were traded in 2010, compared to a TAC in 2010 of 13.500 tonnes.
Čeprav obseg trgovine s tunom ne pomeni nujno, da je bil tun ulovljen v istem letu, pa je vendar zaradi tako velikega razkoraka potrebna temeljita preiskava, saj bi ulov preko kvote vplival na možnosti in časovni okvir za obnovo staleža.
Though the tuna traded would not necessarily only include tuna caught that same year, such a large discrepency merits an in-depth investigation as catches over the quota would affect the probability and time-frame of the recovery.
Zaskrbljenost se poraja tudi zaradi ocen, ki jih uporablja znanstveni odbor ICCAT, o potrebnem zmanjšanju zmogljivosti
Other concerns relate to the estimates used by the SCRS on the amount of capacity that should be removed
Tako je načrt ICCAT za obnovo staleža manj ambiciozen kot zakonodaja EU, oba pa sta precej manj ambiciozna kot Johannesburška deklaracija izpred skoraj desetletja, katere cilj je doseči največji trajnostni donos do leta 2015.
The ICCAT recovery plan is thus less ambitious than EU legislation, and both of them are far less ambitious than the Johannesburg Declaration of almost a decade ago, which sought to achieve B MSY by 2015.
Načrt ICCAT za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna je bil pogosto spremenjen in ojačan.
The ICCAT bluefin recovery plan has been frequently amended and strengthened.
Spremembe v tem poročilu so iz novembra 2010 in se nanašajo na naslednje:
The amendments in the present report date from November 2010 and concern the following:
· zmanjšanje skupnega dovoljenega ulova s 13.500 ton na 12.900 ton (čeprav skupni dovoljeni ulov ni vključen v to uredbo);
· a reduction of the TAC from 13.500 to 12.900 tonnes (though the TAC is not included in this regulation);
· zaostritev različnih vidikov nadzora, zlasti pri prenosu tuna iz mreže v kletko;
· tightening up of various aspects of control, especially relating to transfer of tuna from the net to the cages;
· potrebne so dodatne podrobnosti o letnih ribolovnih načrtih, načrtih za upravljanje zmogljivosti in inšpekcijskih načrtih držav članic;
· further details required in the annual fishing plans, the capacity management plans and the inspection plans of the Member States;
· zaostritev ukrepov za zmanjšanje zmogljivosti;
· strengthening measures for the reduction of capacity;
· podaljšanje lovopusta za ladje z zaporno plavarico v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju;
· extending the closed season for purse seines in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean;
· prepoved skupnih ribolovnih dejavnosti s plovili, ki niso pod zastavo EU;
· prohibition of joint fishing operations with non-EU-flagged vessels;
· raznične določbe za povečanje zmogljivosti nadzora in opazovanja;
· various provisions to increase inspection and observer capacities;
· ustrezne spremembe prilog.
· corresponding changes to the Annexes.
Evropska unija mora sprejeti te spremembe, saj se je o njih dogovorila mednarodna organizacija, EU pa jim ni nasprotovala.
The EU has no choice but to adopt these amendments as they have been agreed by an international organisation and the EU has not tabled an objection.
Zato jih poročevalec v celoti podpira.
Therefore, your rapporteur fully endorses them, as far as they go.
Ali ukrepi ICCAT za upravljanje zadoščajo?
Are ICCAT Management Measures Sufficient?
Ribolov modroplavutega tuna je v nekaterih pogledih nenavaden.
The bluefin tuna fishery is an unusual one in some ways.
Pri številnih ribolovih se uporablja veliko opreme, lovi se na velikem geografskem območju in pod različnim zastavami (med njimi držav v razvoju, razvitih držav in držav, ki ne spoštujejo zahtev).
Many fisheries also use a large number of gears, operate over a wide geographical range and under many different flags (including developing and developed countries as well as flags of non-compliance).
Pri ribolovu modroplavutega tuna je nenavadno to, da te ribe na trgu dosegajo izredno visoko ceno ter da je trg skoncentriran v eni državi, na Japonskem.
What makes the bluefin fishery unusual though is the extraordinary price that the fish obtain on the market and the degree of concentration of the market in one country, Japan.
Zato ima v ribištvu vodilno vlogo združevanje ribolova z zaporno plavarico in dejavnosti za pitanje tuna, kar pojasni veliko dosedanjih težav.
This led to the dominant role in the fishery played by the combined purse seining – tuna fattening operations, which explains many of the past problems.
Finančni donos pri ribolovu je tako velik, da dejavno spodbuja nezakonit, neprijavljen in nereguliran ribolov ter druge nezakonite dejavnosti, ker pa je velik odstotek rib namenjen v eno državo, bi moral biti nadzor trga vsaj teoretično manj težaven.
While the financial returns on fishing are so high that they actively encourage IUU fishing and other illegal activities, the high percentage of fish that goes to one country should, in theory, make the market less problematic to control.
To prinaša obsežne upravljavske in nadzorne ukrepe pri načrtu obnove, pa tudi sistem natančne dokumentacije o ulovu za spremljanje mednarodne trgovine.
This accounts for the extensive management and control measures in the recovery plan, as well as the detailed catch documentation scheme for monitoring international trade.
Spremljanje sej ICCAT ter preučevanje sprejetih ukrepov za upravljanje pa daje vtis, da ICCAT pri prilagajanju sedanjemu ribolovu vedno zaostaja vsaj za korak.
Attending ICCAT meetings, and examining the management measures that are adopted, though, gives the impression that ICCAT is always at least a step behind in terms of adapting to the current fishery.
Industrija ima precej več sredstev za razvoj novega, ne nujno manj učinkovitega ribolovnega orodja ter metod, za razvijanje načinov za izogibanje nadzornim ukrepom ter za iskanje novih načinov za pošiljanje tune zunaj zelo zapletenih veljavnih postopkov spremljanja, kontrole in nadzora.
The industry has far deeper pockets for developing new, but not necessarily lower impact, fishing gears and practices, developing ways to avoid the control measures, and finding new ways to ship tuna outside the scope of the very complex MCS procedures in place.
Člani ICCAT pogosto preprosto nimajo sredstev (ekonomskih, upravnih, tehnoloških), da bi nadzorovali ribolov.
ICCAT members, in many cases, simply do not have the means (economic, administrative, technological) to control the fishery.
Pogosto jim manjka tudi politične volje.
In many cases, they also lack the political will.
Posledica je letno spreminjanje načrta za obnovo ter sistema dokumentacije o ulovu.
The result is the annual amendments to both the recovery plan and the catch documentation scheme.
Poleg tega je, kot je že zapisano, načrt ICCAT za obnovo manj ambiciozen kot notranja zakonodaja EU.
In addition, as noted above, the ICCAT recovery plan is less ambitious that EU domestic legislation.
Glede na povedano poročevalec predlaga, da je čas, da ICCAT končno spremeni svoj pristop in skuša prehiteti in ne kot vedno le dohitevati.
The above considerations lead your rapporteur to suggest that it is time for ICCAT to finally change its approach and to try to jump ahead, instead of always scrambling to catch up.
Evropska komisija je pogosto poskusila spodbuditi ICCAT k daljnosežnejšemu in hitrejšemu ravnanju, vendar doslej z zelo malo uspeha.
The European Commission has frequently tried to push ICCAT to move further and faster but with very limited success.
Čas je, da Evropska unija sprejme trdne previdnostne ukrepe, kot jih zahteva sporazum ZN o ribjih staležih, namesto da jo ICCAT nenehno ovira.
It is time for the EU to take firm, precautionary action as required by the UN Fish Stocks Agreement, rather than being continually held back by ICCAT.
EU lahko nemudoma sprejme dva ukrepa.
Two measures could be taken by the EU immediately.
Znanstveni odbor ICCAT je moral po reviziji načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna leta 2008 opredeliti najpomembnejša drstišča modroplavutega tuna v Sredozemskem morju, da bi lahko vzpostavili zavarovana območja.
The 2008 revision of the bluefin recovery plan requested the SCRS to identify the major spawning zones of bluefin in the Mediterranean, with a view to creating sanctuaries.
Znanstveni odbor je leta 2010 opredelil šest območij:
In 2010 the SCRS identified the following six zones:
Ta območja so deloma v pristojnosti EU in deloma v mednarodnih vodah.
Parts of these six zones lie within EU jurisdiction and parts are in international waters.
Evropska unija lahko neovirano razglasi ta območja za zaprta ali zavarovana območja za modroplavutega tuna in v njih prepove ribolov v obdobju drstenja.
There is nothing to prevent the EU from declaring these zones to be closed areas, or sanctuaries, for bluefin tuna and closing them to fishing during the spawning season.
Tak korak bi bil v skladu z okoljsko zakonodajo EU (okvirno strategijo o pomorski strategiji, Naturo 2000 itd).
Such a step would also be coherent with EU environmental legislation (MSFD, Natura 2000, etc.)
Z eno drzno potezo bi Evropska unija veliko prispevala k ohranitvi modroplavutega tuna in bistveno povečala možnosti za obnovo staleža.
In one bold move, the EU could make a major contribution to bluefin tuna conservation and dramatically increase the probability of the recovery of the stock.
Enostranska izjava EU o zaprtih območjih v obdobju drstenja bi veljala za plovila pod zastavo EU na celotni površini vseh šestih območij ter za plovila pod zastavo tretjih držav v vodah v pristojnosti EU (na območjih 1, 2 in 3).
A unilateral EU declaration of spawning closures would apply to EU-flagged vessels throughout all six zones and vessels flying third country flags only to waters under EU jurisdiction (in areas 1, 2 and 3).
Ker ima Evropska unija dovoljenje za 56 % celotnega dovoljenega ulova, bi bila skušnjava za izpis iz registra EU za ribolov v teh vodah minimalna.
The fact that the EU has 56% of the TAC for bluefin means that the temptation to leave the EU register in order to fish in those waters would be minimal.
Načrt za obnovo staleža določa velikost 30 kg kot minimalno velikost za modroplavutega tuna.
The recovery plan imposes a minimum size of 30 kg for bluefin tuna.
Vendar veljajo za to velikost tri izjeme.
However, there are three derogations from this size.
Modroplavutega tuna od 8 kg naprej lahko iztovorijo plovila za prevoz vabe in plovila za ribolov s panulo v Atlantiku, mala obalna ribištva v Sredozemlju ter za gojenje v Jadranskem morju.
Bluefin as small as 8 kg can be landed by baitboats and trollers in the Atlantic, by coastal artisanal fisheries in the Mediterranean and for farming purposes in the Adriatic Sea.
Tovrstni ribolov poteka z industrijsko zaporno plavarico, kar je težko opravičljivo.
This latter fishery is conducted by industrial purse seiners and is difficult to justify.
Evropska unija bi lahko odpravila izjemo za svoja plovila.
The EU could remove that derogation for its own vessels.
Vloženi so bili predlogi sprememb za izvajanje teh ukrepov.
Amendments to implement these measures have been tabled.
S tema ukrepoma upravljanja bi bistveno izboljšali možnosti za obnovitev staleža modroplavutega tuna v Sredozemskem morju.
These two management actions would significantly improve the prospects for recovery of bluefin in the Mediterranean.
Vse skupaj bi pomenilo večjo verjetnost za uspeh načrta za obnovo staleža in po možnosti uresničitev tega cilja pred letom 2022, kar bi bilo v skladu z notranjo zakonodajo EU.
They would, together, result in a higher probability of success of the recovery plan and possibly the achievement of its objective at an earlier date than 2022, which would then be consistent with EU domestic legislation.
Zato je bil vložen tretji predlog spremembe glede ciljev načrta.
For this reason a third amendment has been tabled to the objectives of the plan.
Stalež modroplavutega tuna se je z leti izrazito zmanjšal, zato so potrebni nujni ukrepi za njegovo zaščito.
Stocks of Atlantic bluefin tuna have been drastically reduced over the years and urgent action is required to protect them.
Zato je Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev atlantskega tuna (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna – ICCAT), s katero je EU pogodbenica, na svojem letnem srečanju leta 2010 sprejela novo priporočilo.
In this context, the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), to which the EU is a contracting party (CPC), agreed a new recommendation at its annual meeting in 2010.
Namen priporočila 10-04 je, da se s spremembo predhodno dogovorjenega večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna povečajo ukrepi za zaščito modroplavutega tuna.
Recommendation 10-04 seeks to increase the measures to protect bluefin tuna by amending the previously agreed multiannual recovery plan.
Spremembe vključujejo zmanjšanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova in krepitev nadzornih ukrepov za izvajanje načrta za obnovo staleža, zlasti ukrepov v zvezi s postopki reje v mrežasti kletki in prenosa.
The changes include a reduction of the Total Allowable Catch and a strengthening of the control measures used to implement the recovery plan, specifically those control measures relating to caging and transfer operations.
Namen predloga Komisije je prenesti to novo priporočilo ICCAT v zakonodajo EU.
The purpose of the Commission's proposal is to transpose this new ICCAT recommendation into EU law.
Ker je bilo priporočilo ICCAT že sprejeto na mednarodni ravni, je malo manevrskega prostora za spreminjanje prevzetega besedila.
Given that the ICCAT recommendation has already been adopted at international level, there is limited scope for amending the text of the transposition.
Pa vendarle bi bilo dobro za izboljšanje predloga sprejeti nekaj sprememb.
However, there are some modifications which could be made in order to improve the proposal.
Usklajenost z drugimi pravnimi obveznostmi
Consistency with other legal obligations
Poleg priporočila ICCAT EU zavezujejo tudi druge pravne obveznosti, ki zadevajo ribje staleže in morsko okolje.
In addition to the ICCAT recommendation, the EU is also bound by other legal obligations regarding fish stocks and the marine environment.
Med temi je najbrž najpomembnejša Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji, ki države članice obvezuje, da najkasneje do leta 2020 vzpostavijo „dobro okoljsko stanje“.
The most significant of these is perhaps the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, which obliges Member States to achieve 'good environmental status' by 2020 at the latest.
Sklep Komisije 2010/477, ki določa merila in metodološke standarde za dobro okoljsko stanje morskih voda, določa tudi, da morajo biti staleži vseh rib, ki se izkoriščajo za komercialne namene, „v varnih bioloških mejah“.
Commission Decision 2010/477, which sets out criteria and methodological standards concerning good environmental status of marine waters, states that populations of all commercially exploited fish should be "within safe biological limits".
Ker je v členu 7 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določeno, da EU skrbi za notranjo usklajenost svojih politik in dejavnosti, se morajo obveze iz Okvirne direktive o morski strategiji odražati tudi v večletnem načrtu za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna.
Given that under Article 7 TFEU the EU must ensure consistency between its legislation and policies, it is necessary to reflect the obligations contained in the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in the multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna.
Postopek reje v mrežasti kletki se nanaša na prenos modroplavutega tuna v kletke za pitanje in gojenje Del besedila ICCAT, ki se nanaša na določanje odgovornosti pogodbenice v primeru, ko se gojenje izvaja zunaj njene jurisdikcije, je izpuščen iz prevzetega besedila.
A section of the ICCAT text, which refers to determining the responsible CPC in cases where a farm is located outside the jurisdiction of a CPC, has been omitted from the text of the transposition.
Ta del besedila je treba vstaviti, da se pojasni odgovornost pogodbenice v takih primerih.
This should be inserted in order to clarify the responsible CPC in this specific context.
Besedilo ICCAT poudarja pomen odkrivanja in varovanja drstišč.
The ICCAT text highlights the importance of the identification and protection of spawning grounds.
Odbor za okolje mora ponovno izpostaviti njihov pomen, saj so bistven element vsakega uspešnega načrta za obnovo staleža.
The Environment Committee should reiterate the significance of this, as it is likely to be an essential element of any successful recovery plan.
Da bi se stalež obnovil, so v priporočilu določeni dodatno zmanjšanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova (total allowable catch – TAC) ter strožji ukrepi za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti in strožji nadzorni ukrepi, zlasti v zvezi s postopki prenosa in reje v mrežasti kletki.
In order to rebuild the stock, the recommendation provides for a further reduction of the total allowable catch, for strengthening measures to reduce the fishing capacity and for reinforcing the control measures, in particular as regards the transfer and the caging operations , and
Predvideni so tudi dodatni nasveti za odkrivanje drstišč in ustvarjanje zaščitenih območij do leta 2012 .
foresees additional advice on the identification of spawning grounds and creation of sanctuaries to be developed by 2012 .
Priporočilo ICCAT poudarja, da je nujno pravilno odkrivanje drstišč.
The ICCAT recommendation highlights the need to properly identify spawning grounds as a matter of urgency.
(3a) Čeprav je namen Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2371/2002 z dne 20. decembra 2002 zagotoviti ohranitev in trajnostno izkoriščanje ribolovnih virov v okviru skupne ribiške politike, je stanje glede trajnosti modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemlju zaradi visoke stopnje ribolovne smrtnosti in nizke biomase drstilnega staleža precej skrb zbujajoče.
(3a) Although Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 aims to ensure the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy, the situation with regard to the sustainability of the bluefin tuna in the Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean is a matter of considerable concern, due to the high fishing mortality rate and the low spawning stock biomass.
(3a) Politika in zakonodaja Unije bi morali biti skladni s ciljem, da je treba zagotoviti takšno izkoriščanje živih morskih bioloških virov, da se obnavljajo in ohranjajo zdrave populacije lovljenih vrst na ravneh, ki bodo, kjer je to mogoče, do leta 2015 privedle do največjega trajnostnega donosa, kakor je bilo dogovorjeno na svetovnem vrhu o trajnostnem razvoju leta 2002.
(3a) Union policy and legislation in relation to bluefin tuna should be consistent with the objective of ensuring an exploitation of living marine biological resources that restores and maintains healthy populations of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield by 2015, where possible, as was - adopted at the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development;
(3a) Politika in zakonodaja Unije, povezana z modroplavutim tunom, bi morala biti skladna z Direktivo 2008/56/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 17. junija 2008 o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji) 1 ter Sklepa Komisije 2010/477/EU z dne 1. septembra 2010 o merilih in metodoloških standardih na področju dobrega okoljskega stanja morskih voda 2 , ki od držav članic zahtevata ukrepanje za zagotovitev, da bo najpozneje leta 2020 biomasa drstilnega staleža vseh populacij rib, ki se izkoriščajo za komercialne namene, vključno z modroplavutim tunom, vsaj na takšni ravni, ki omogoča največji trajnostni donos.
(3a) Union policy and legislation in relation to bluefin tuna should be consistent with Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive) 1 and Commission Decision 2010/477/EU of 1 September 2010 on criteria and methodological standards on good environmental status of marine waters 2 , which require Member States to take action to ensure that, by 2020, at the latest, the spawning stock biomass of all populations of commercially exploited fish, including bluefin tuna, is at or above the spawning stock biomass associated with maximum sustainable yield.
1 UL L 164, 25.6.2008, str.
1 OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p.
2 UL L 232, 2.9.2010, str.
2 OJ L 232, 2.9.2010, p.
Poleg priporočila ICCAT EU zavezuje tudi Okvirna direktiva o morski strategiji, ki države članice zavezuje, da do leta 2020 dosežejo dobro okoljsko stanje.
In addition to the ICCAT recommendation, the EU is also bound by the Marine Framework Strategy Directive, which obliges the Member States to 'achieve good environmental status' by 2020.
Dobro okoljsko stanje pomeni zagotovilo, da so staleži vseh rib, ki se izkoriščajo za komercialne namene, v varnih bioloških mejah.
Good environmental status means ensuring that commercially exploited fish stocks are within safe biological limits.
EU mora zagotoviti notranjo usklajenost politik in dejavnosti, kot je določeno v členu 7 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, zato se morajo obveze iz Okvirne direktive o morski strategiji odražati tudi v večletnem načrtu za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna.
To ensure consistency between policies and legislation, which the EU is required to do by Art 7 TFEU, it is necessary to reflect the relevant obligations of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive in the recovery plan for bluefin tuna.
(3a) Večletni načrti obnovitve iz člena 5 Uredbe (ES) št. 2371/2002, na primer načrt obnovitve modroplavutega tuna, morajo vsebovati previdnostni pristop k upravljanju ribištva iz iste uredbe in previdnostnega pristopa iz člena 191 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ter morajo biti skladni s Sporazumom ZN o staležu rib, zaradi česar mora biti Unija previdnejša, kadar nima gotovih, zanesljivih in zadostnih informacij, ter mora preprečiti zlorabo pomanjkanja znanstvenih informacij kot izgovor za neukrepanje ali odlašanje z ukrepi za upravljanje in ohranitev modroplavutega tuna.
(3a) Multi-annual recovery plans drawn up under Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002, such as the recovery plan for bluefin tuna, must apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management set out in that Regulation and the precautionary principle laid down in Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and be in accordance with the UN Fish Stocks Agreement, thereby resulting in the need for more caution to be exercised on the part of the Union when information is uncertain, unreliable or inadequate and making it imperative that the absence of adequate scientific information is not used as a reason for postponing or failing to take management measures to conserve bluefin tuna and their environment.
Cilj tega načrta za obnovo staleža je doseganje biomase, ki ustreza največjemu trajnostnemu donosu z več kot 60-odstotno verjetnostjo.
The objective of that recovery plan shall be to achieve a biomass corresponding to the maximum sustainable yield with greater than 60 % probability.
Cilj tega načrta za obnovo staleža je doseganje biomase, ki ustreza največjemu trajnostnemu donosu z več kot 75-odstotno verjetnostjo , do leta 2015 .
The objective of that recovery plan shall be to achieve, by 2015, a biomass corresponding to the maximum sustainable yield with greater than 75 % probability.
Ribolov modroplavutega tuna z zaporno plavarico se v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju prepove v obdobju od 15. junija do 15. maja .
Purse seine fishing for bluefin tuna shall be prohibited in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean during the period from 15 June to 15 May.