natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
19. zagotoviti bi bilo treba, da bo sodelovanje med EU in Ukrajino obravnavalo tudi spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, in sicer s spodbujanjem in izvajanjem mednarodnih standardov človekovih pravic, spoštovanjem manjšin ter bojem proti nečloveškemu in ponižujočemu ravnanju;
19. to ensure that the cooperation between the EU and the Ukraine also addresses respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms through the promotion and implementation of international human rights standards, respect for minorities and the fight against inhuman and degrading treatment;
20. poudariti je treba, da Ukrajina ne bi smela zmanjšati zaščite delovnih standardov, da bi pritegnila tuje naložbe ;
20. to stress that Ukraine should not relax protection of labour standards in order to attract foreign investment ;
21. zagotoviti je treba, da bo EU dosledno skrbela za podoben napredek v odnosih z drugimi vzhodnimi partnericami, ki so pripravljene spoštovati demokratične vrednote in odprto trgovino; Ukrajino je treba pozivati, naj spodbuja sodelovanje s strokovnjaki iz celotne EU, ki dnevno sodelujejo s partnerji iz partnerskih držav, jim pomagajo pospešiti reforme ter delijo svoje praktične izkušnje in zglede, pridobljene na različnih področjih v EU;
21. to ensure that the EU consistently makes similar progress with the other Eastern Partners willing to comply with democratic values and trade openness; to encourage Ukraine to promote cooperation with experts from all over the EU who cooperate with partners from the partner states on a daily basis, help them speed up reforms and share their EU practical experience and the best practices acquired in various fields;
22. sprejeti je treba odprt in razumen pristop v postopku vizumske liberalizacije, ko se bo začela faza izvajanja, na podlagi odločitve EU o pošteni oceni prizadevanj Ukrajine za izpolnitev obveznosti;
22. to adopt an open and rational approach to the visa liberalisation process when it comes to its implementation phase, basing EU decisions on fair assessments of efforts by Ukraine to fulfil its commitments;
23. na podlagi določb člena 218(5) Pogodbe je treba pozvati k sprejetju sklepa, ki dovoljuje začasno uporabo predpisov iz sporazuma o prosti trgovini, ki je temeljni del pridružitvenega sporazuma, preden ta začne veljati;
23. to call – pursuant to the provisions of Article 218(5) of the Treaty – for a decision to be taken authorising provisional application of the regulations of the Free Trade Agreement, which is a fundamental part of the Association Agreement, before it enters into effect;
24. ukrajinske organe je treba pozvati, naj vzpostavijo učinkovit sistem za uveljavitev določb sporazuma o prosti trgovini in stalno sodelujejo z evropskimi institucijami pri izvajanju tega sporazuma.
24. to call on the Ukrainian authorities to set up an effective system for putting the provisions of the Free Trade Agreement into effect and to cooperate on an ongoing basis with the European institutions in implementing this agreement;
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Elmar Brok, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Marietta Gianaku (Marietta Giannakou), Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadzigeorgiu (Takis Hadjigeorgiou), Anna Ibrisagic, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Othmar Karas, Ioanis Kasulidis (Ioannis Kasoulides), Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Evgeni Kirilov, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Paweł Robert Kowal, Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kiriakos Mavronikolas (Kyriakos Mavronikolas), Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Gabriele Albertini, Pino Arlacchi, Elmar Brok, Mário David, Michael Gahler, Marietta Giannakou, Ana Gomes, Andrzej Grzyb, Takis Hadjigeorgiou, Anna Ibrisagic, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Jelko Kacin, Othmar Karas, Ioannis Kasoulides, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Evgeni Kirilov, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Paweł Robert Kowal, Eduard Kukan, Alexander Graf Lambsdorff, Vytautas Landsbergis, Krzysztof Lisek, Sabine Lösing, Ulrike Lunacek, Mario Mauro, Kyriakos Mavronikolas, Francisco José Millán Mon, Alexander Mirsky, María Muñiz De Urquiza, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Raimon Obiols, Pier Antonio Panzeri, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Alojz Peterle, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, Cristian Dan Preda, Tokia Saïfi, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, Werner Schulz, Adrian Severin, Marek Siwiec, Hannes Swoboda, Kristian Vigenin, Boris Zala
Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Adam Bielan, Véronique De Keyser, Göran Färm, Hélène Flautre, Roberto Gualtieri, Elisabeth Jeggle, Doris Pack, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Helmut Scholz, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Traian Ungureanu, Ivo Vajgl
Charalampos Angourakis, Adam Bielan, Véronique De Keyser, Göran Färm, Hélène Flautre, Roberto Gualtieri, Elisabeth Jeggle, Doris Pack, Tomasz Piotr Poręba, Helmut Scholz, György Schöpflin, Alf Svensson, Traian Ungureanu, Ivo Vajgl
Poročevalec: Jens Geier
Rapporteur: Jens Geier
o proračunskem nadzoru finančne pomoči EU v Afganistanu
on b udgetary control of EU financial assistance to Afghanistan
UL C 294E, 31.12.2009, str.
OJ C 294E, 31.12.2009, p.
87. , z dne 24. aprila 2009 o pravicah žensk v Afganistanu
87. , of 24 April 2009 on women’s rights in Afghanistan
UL C 184E, 8.7.2010, str.
OJ C 184E, 8.7.2010, p.
57. in z dne 16. decembra 2010 o novi strategiji za Afganistan
57. , and of 16 December 2010 on a new strategy for Afghanistan
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0490 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0490 . ,
– o upoštevanju svojih resolucij o razrešnici glede izvrševanja splošnega proračuna Evropske unije za proračunsko leto 2007 z dne 23. aprila 2009
– having regard to its resolution on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2007 of 23 April 2009
1. in za proračunsko leto 2008 z dne 5. maja 2010
1. and for the financial year 2008 of 5 May 2010
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. julija 2011 o prihodnosti proračunske podpore EU državam v razvoju
– having regard to its resolution of 5 July 2011 on the future of EU budget support to developing countries
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0317 . ,
Texts adopted, P7_TA-PROV(2011)0317 . ,
– ob upoštevanju konference v Kabulu dne 20. julija 2010, na kateri so se donatorji dogovorili, da bodo bolje uskladili svoje programe in se zavezali načelom učinkovitosti pomoči, ter konference v Londonu dne 28. januarja 2010, na kateri so se donatorji dogovorili, da bodo ustanovili neodvisen urad za visoki nadzor in usmerjali več razvojne pomoči prek vlade Islamske republike Afganistan, ob podpori reform struktur in proračuna,
– having regard to the Kabul Conference of 20 July 2010, at which the donors agreed to better align their programmes and commit to the principles of aid effectiveness, as well as the London Conference of 28 January 2010 at which the donors agreed to establish an independent Office of High Oversight and to channel more development assistance through the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA), supported by reforms to structures and budgets,
– ob upoštevanju odgovorov Komisije na vprašanja Odbora za proračunski nadzor z dne 7. septembra 2010 in 22. junija 2011,
– having regard to the Commission’s replies to questions by the Committee on Budgetary Control dated 7 September 2010 and 22 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju posebnega poročila Evropskega računskega sodišča št. 3/2011 o učinkovitosti in uspešnosti prispevkov EU, usmerjenih prek organizacij Združenih narodov v državah, ki so bile prizadete v konfliktih,
– having regard to the European Court of Auditors’ Special Report No 3/2011 on ‘The Efficiency and Effectiveness of EU Contributions Channelled through United Nations Organisations in Conflict-Affected Countries’,
– ob upoštevanju revizijskih poročil posebnega generalnega inšpektorja za afganistansko obnovo (SIGAR),
– having regard to the audit reports of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR),
– ob upoštevanju revizijskih poročil urada ZDA za vladno odgovornost (GAO) o Afganistanu,
– having regard to the audit reports of the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Afghanistan,
– ob upoštevanju revizijskih poročil generalnega inšpektorja Agencije ZDA za mednarodni razvoj (USAID) o Afganistanu,
– having regard to the audit reports of the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) on Afghanistan,
– ob upoštevanju končnega poročila komisije za sklepanje pogodb v vojnem času v Iraku in Afganistanu za kongres ZDA z naslovom Preoblikovanje sklepanja pogodb v vojnem času,
– having regard to the final report of the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan to US Congress, entitled 'Transforming Wartime Contracting',
– ob upoštevanju osnutka afganistanskega zakona o vrhovni revizijski službi,
– having regard to the draft Afghan ‘Supreme Audit Office Law’,
– ob upoštevanju mehiške deklaracije Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI) o neodvisnosti vrhovnih revizijskih institucij, sprejete leta 2007,
– having regard to the Mexico Declaration of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) on the Independence of Supreme Audit Institutions, as endorsed in 2007,
– ob upoštevanju akcijskega načrta EU za Afganistan in Pakistan, ki ga je Svet sprejel 27. oktobra 2009, in njegovih poročil o izvajanju, ki se objavljajo dvakrat letno,
– having regard to ‘EU Action Plan for Afghanistan and Pakistan’, as adopted by the Council on 27 October 2009, and to its biannually published implementing reports ,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa 2011/23 izvršilnega odbora Programa ZN za razvoj, Sklada ZN za prebivalstvo in Urada ZN za projektne storitve, sprejetega na letnem zasedanju leta 2011 (od 6. do 17. junija 2011),
– having regard to Decision 2011/23 of the Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme, the United Nations Population Fund and the United Nations Office for Project Services adopted at its annual session 2011 (6 to 17 June 2011),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za razvoj ( A7–0388/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and of the Committee on Development ( A7-0388/2011 ),
A. ker je resolucija Parlamenta z dne 16. decembra 2010 o novi strategiji za Afganistan opredelila številna pomembna vprašanja v zvezi s proračunskim nadzorom finančne pomoči EU v Afganistanu,
A. whereas Parliament’s resolution of 16 December 2010 on a new strategy for Afghanistan identified several issues of concern in relation to the budgetary control of EU financial assistance to Afghanistan,
B. ker je organizacija Integrity Watch obvestila, da se je leta 2009 v Afganistanu plačala več kot milijarda dolarjev za podkupnine,
B. whereas, according to the Integrity Watch organisation, bribes of over $1billion were paid in Afghanistan in 2009,
C. ker je Odbor za proračunski nadzor odgovoren za spremljanje stroškovne učinkovitosti izvajanja splošnega proračuna EU,
C. whereas the Committee on Budgetary Control is responsible for monitoring the cost‑effectiveness of the implementation of the EU General Budget,
D. ker so načela odgovornosti in preglednosti javnega denarja temelj demokracije,
D. whereas the principles of accountability and transparency of public money are fundamental to democracy,
E. ker je Afganistan ena od držav prejemnic, ki prejmejo največ civilne pomoči iz splošnega proračuna EU,
E. whereas Afghanistan is amongst the recipient countries receiving the most civilian aid from the EU General Budget,
F. ker je Evropska komisija Afganistanu od leta 2002 namenila več kakor 2 milijardi EUR in izplačala več kakor 1,8 milijarde EUR razvojne in humanitarne pomoči,
F. whereas the European Commission has committed over EUR 2 billion and disbursed over EUR 1.8 billion in development and humanitarian aid to Afghanistan since 2002,
2. ugotavlja, da ima vsaka od poti financiranja, kot so prikazane v tabeli v obrazložitvi, svoje prednosti in pomanjkljivosti glede specifičnih ciljev porabe;
Notes that each of the funding channels carries its own specific benefits and drawbacks with regard to specific spending objectives as displayed in the table in the explanatory statement;
7. ponavlja, da ima Parlament vlogo nadzornika, zato zahteva, naj Komisija te korake uvede na pregleden način, tako da javnosti da na razpolago:
Reiterates the oversight role of Parliament and therefore demands of the Commission that it introduce these steps in a transparent way by making publicly available:
– dogovore, sklenjene z vlado Islamske republike Afganistan;
– the agreements reached with the GIRoA;
– izhodišče, kazalnike, cilje, metode izračuna in vire preverjanja za ocenjevanje napredka in sprejemanje odločitev o izplačilu spremenljivih obrokov morebitne prihodnje proračunske podpore na podlagi uspešnosti;
– the baseline, indicators, targets, calculation methods and verification sources to assess progress and to determine decisions to disburse performance-based and variable tranches of potential future budget support;
– jasna in standardizirana poročila, ki na objektiven in pregleden način ocenjujejo napredek na podlagi opredeljenih meril in, po potrebi, razloge, zakaj napredek morda ni bil dosežen tako, kakor je bilo sprva načrtovano;
– clear and standardised reports which assess – in an objective and transparent way – progress on the basis of the criteria defined and – if necessary – the reasons why progress may not have been achieved as initially planned;
Odgovornost in nadzor nad sredstvi EU v Afganistanu
Accountability and oversight of EU funds in Afghanistan
Pomanjkljivosti, o katerih poročajo revizorji
Weaknesses as reported by auditors
– pomanjkljivosti pri zasnovi projektov, zaradi katere so projekti nevzdržni in neučinkoviti;
– weaknesses in project design leading to unsustainable and ineffective projects;
– poročanje agencij Združenih narodov Komisiji, ki zaostaja, je presplošno, usmerjeno v dejavnosti in ne v rezultate ter Komisiji ne omogoča primernega pregleda učinkovitosti določenega projekta;
– reporting by the United Nations Agencies to the Commission which is behindhand, too general and activities rather than results oriented and does not allow the Commission to check adequately the efficiency of a given project;
9. je zaskrbljen zaradi poročil drugih revizorjev, kot so posebni generalni inšpektor ZDA za afganistansko obnovo (SIGAR), urad ZDA za vladno odgovornost (GAO), komisija za sklepanje pogodb v vojnem času in generalni inšpektor Agencije ZDA za mednarodni razvoj (USAID), ki so ugotovili naslednje pomanjkljivosti:
Is concerned about reports by other audit entities such as the United States Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) , the Commission on Wartime Contracting and the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which have identified the following weaknesses:
– visoko tveganje korupcije in goljufij v državi, kot je nedavno pokazal škandal na Kabulski banki in kot je razvidno iz končnega poročila komisije za sklepanje pogodb v vojnem času, ki ocenjuje, da je bilo 5 do 9 odstotkov celotne pomoči ZDA, porabljene v Iraku in Afganistanu, podvrženih goljufiji; tudi poročilo organizacije Integrity Watch, v katerem se poroča, da se je od več kot milijarde dolarjev, ki jo je leta 2009 Afganistan plačal za podkupnine, tretjina porabila za plačevanje različnih javnih storitev (dokumentacija, izobraževanje, zdravstveno varstvo), policija pa naj bi bila najbolj podkupljiv organ;
– high risk of corruption and fraud in the country as evidenced by the Kabul Bank scandal in the recent past and by the final report of the Commission on Wartime Contracting, which has estimated that 5 to 9 per cent of total US aid spent in Iraq and Afghanistan was subject to fraud; according to the Integrity Watch report also, of the over $ 1 billion in bribes paid by Afghanistan in 2009, one-third was used as payment for various public services (documentation, education, health), the police service being the most corrupt;
– pomanjkanje sposobnosti večine afganistanskih ministrstev za pripravo razpisov in upravljanje s pogodbami, kar je posledica visoke stopnje nepismenosti in slabe usposobljenosti osebja;
– lack of ability on the part of most Afghan ministries to tender and manage contracts owing to a high rate of illiteracy and poorly trained staff;
– nezanesljive podatkovne zbirke afganistanske nacionalne policije (ANP), saj podatki nihajo od 111 774 do 125 218 policistov, kar sproža dvom o zakonitosti in pravilnosti plač, izplačanih afganistanskim policistom, ki je glavni cilj največjega posamičnega projekta, ki ga financira EU, skrbniškega sklada za javni red in mir (LOTFA);
– unreliable databases of the Afghan National Police (ANP), as figures range from 111 774 to 125 218 policemen, which raises doubt as to the legality and regularity of the salaries paid to the Afghan policemen, which is the main objective of the single largest project funded by the EU, the Law and Order Trust Fund (LOTFA);
– visoko tveganje izgube sredstev, kot je razvidno iz končnega poročila komisije za sklepanje pogodb v vojnem času, ki ocenjuje, da je bilo 10 do 20 odstotkov celotne pomoči ZDA, porabljene v Iraku in Afganistanu, izgubljenih;
– high risk of waste of funds as evidenced by the final report of the Commission on Wartime Contracting, which has estimated that 10 to 20 per cent of total US aid spent in Iraq and Afghanistan was wasted;
– številni zaporedni podizvajalci, kar povzroča kopičenje zamud in splošnih stroškov ter omejuje izvajanje nadzora nad glavnim izvajalcem, pa tudi zmanjšuje delež afganistanskih prebivalcev, ki imajo koristi od projektov;
– cascades of sub-contractors which lead to delays and overhead costs adding up, and also limit the exercise of oversight over the prime contractor, as well as limiting the proportion of Afghan locals benefiting from these projects;
– financirajo se kratkoročni projekti, katerih možnosti za dolgoročno vzdržnost so omejene;
– short-term projects being funded with limited chances of being sustainable in the long run;
– neobstoj popolne neodvisnosti afganistanskega nadzornega in revizijskega urada od vlade Islamske republike Afganistan;
– lack of full independence of the Control and Audit Office of Afghanistan from the GIRoA;
11. priznava težke okoliščine, v katerih mora Komisija izplačevati pomoč državi, ki je že več desetletij prizadeta zaradi vojne; poudarja, da je treba tudi preglede na kraju samem opravljati v zelo težkih varnostnih razmerah; poziva Komisijo, naj uporabi alternativne revizijske in kontrolne preglede, ki se še lahko izvajajo na kraju samem v sedanjih varnostnih razmerah; nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj obravnava ugotovljene pomanjkljivosti in financira projekte, če ustrezajo naslednjim merilom:
Acknowledges the difficult circumstances under which the Commission has to deliver aid in a country which has been affected by war for decades; underlines that on-the-spot checks have to be also carried out under difficult security conditions; calls on the Commission to apply alternative audit and control checks which can still be carried out on the spot under current security conditions; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to address the weaknesses identified and to fund projects if they meet the following criteria:
– finančna in operativna dolgoročna vzdržnost;
– financial and operational long-term sustainability;
– spodbujanje afganistanske zavezanosti projektu v največji možni meri;
– encouragement of Afghan ownership of the project to the highest possible extent;
– odprava dejavnika tveganja goljufije in korupcije v največji možni meri;
– fraud and corruption risk factor eliminated to the highest possible extent;
14. je zaskrbljen zaradi poročil iz različnih zanesljivih in neodvisnih virov, da afganistanski organi na najvišji ravni ovirajo protikorupcijske preiskave afganistanskih tožilcev proti uradnikom, kot so guvernerji;
Is concerned about reports from various reliable and independent sources that Afghan authorities at the highest level obstruct anti-corruption investigations by Afghan prosecutors against officials such as governors;
Izboljšanje odgovornosti glede pomoči, usmerjene prek agencij ZN v Afganistanu
Improving the accountability of aid channelled via UN Agencies in Afghanistan
22. opozarja na tekoča prizadevanja delovne skupine za odgovornost za pomoč ob nesrečah in za revidiranje te pomoči, ustanovljene v okviru Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI), ki jo vodi član Evropskega računskega sodišča
Draws attention to the current efforts of the Working Group on ‘Accountability for and Audit of Disaster-related Aid’ established in the context of the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) and led by a Member of the European Court of Auditors
http://eca.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/intosai-aada/home ; podpira njega dva glavna cilja:
http://eca.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/intosai-aada/home ; supports its two main objectives:
– opredelitev smernic in dobre prakse na področju odgovornosti z zagotavljanjem jasnih, preglednih in standardiziranih informacij vsem interesnim skupinam (donatorjem, upravičencem, mednarodnim organizacijam, nevladnim organizacijam) z namenom doseči enoten celovit model poročanja;
– establishing guidance and good practice in the area of accountability by providing clear, transparent and standardised information to all stakeholders (donors, beneficiaries, international organisations, NGOs) with a view to ultimately arriving at a single integrated reporting model;
– opredelitev smernic in dobre prakse na področju revizije z namenom doseči enoten koncept revizije, ki bi pomenil, da se vsak euro revidira samo enkrat, revizijo pa opravi zunanji revizor, ki zadosti potrebam po odgovornosti vseh interesnih skupin;
– establishing guidance and good practice in the area of audit with a view to ultimately arriving at a single audit concept, which would mean that every euro was only audited once, by an external auditor who would cover the assurance needs of all stakeholders;
Usklajevanje pomoči donatorske skupnosti
Coordination of aid efforts by the donor community
29. pričakuje, da bo ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanje delovanje (ESZD) izboljšala koordinacijo in vzajemno delovanje ter povečala preglednost pri izvajanju projektov EU, prav tako pa zagotovila bolj trajnostno in učinkovitejšo uporabo sredstev EU v Afganistanu; pričakuje tudi, da bodo odgovornosti v delegaciji EU jasno določene;
Anticipates that the creation of the EEAS (European External Action Service) will result in better coordination and interaction, as well as greater transparency in the implementation of EU projects and the more sustainable and efficient use of EU funding in Afghanistan; expects also that responsibilities within the EU Delegation will be clearly established;
Izboljšanje poročanja
Improvements to reporting