natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Ribolov modroplavutega tuna z zaporno plavarico v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju se prepove.
Purse seine fishing for bluefin tuna shall be prohibited in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean .
Petim od osmih vrst tune grozi izumrtje zaradi prekomernega ribolova.
Five out of the eight tuna species are at risk of extinction due to over-fishing.
Najnovejša ocena po naročilu Mednarodne zveze za ohranjanje narave in naravnih virov ugotavlja, da je južni in atlantski modroplavuti tun mogoče rešiti edino z ukinitvijo ribolova, dokler se staleži ne obnovijo.
The latest assessment for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) concludes that the only way to save southern and Atlantic bluefin tuna was to shut down the fisheries until stocks were rebuilt.
(Če se predlog spremembe sprejme, se člena 30 in 31 ustrezno spremenita zaradi skladnosti.)
(If adopted, articles 30 and 31 are adapted to be consistent).
Člen 1 – točka 5a (novo)
Article 1 – point 5a (new)
(5a) Vstavi se naslednji člen:
(5a) The following article shall be inserted:
Komisija na podlagi razpoložljivih znanstvenih raziskav Stalnega odbora za raziskave in statistiko glede šestih največjih drstišč v Sredozemskem morju popiše drstišča v Uniji in v skladu s previdnostnim načelom določi zavarovana območja.“
The Commission, based on the available scientific research provided by the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics concerning the six dominant spawning areas in the Mediterranean, shall identify the spawning grounds within the Union and shall create sanctuaries pursuant to the precautionary principle."
Če so ribogojnice, ki imajo dovoljenje za gojenje modroplavutega tuna, ulovljenega na območju konvencije, zunaj voda v jurisdikciji pogodbenic, ta odstavek smiselno velja za pogodbenice tam, kjer se nahajajo fizične ali pravne osebe, odgovorne za takšne ribogojnice.
When the farming facilities authorised to operate for farming of bluefin tuna caught in the Convention area ("FFBs") are located beyond waters that are under the jurisdiction of CPCs, this paragraph shall apply, mutatis mutandis , to the CPCs where the natural or legal persons responsible for FFBs are located.
Ribogojnice zunaj jurisdikcije pogodbenic so omenjene v priporočilu ICCAT, a so izključene iz predloga Komisije.
The reference to farms located outside a CPC's jurisdiction is included in the ICCAT recommendation but has been excluded from the Commission's proposal.
V ključiti jih je treba , da bo jasno, katera pogodbenica je odgovorna.
It should be included in order to clarify which CPC is responsible.
Člen 1 – točka 16a (novo)
Article 1 – point 16a (new)
(16a) Člen 33 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(16a) Article 33 is replaced by the following :
„Člen 33
"Article 33
Države članice sprejmejo izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z ribiškim plovilom, ki pluje pod njihovo zastavo in za katero je bilo v skladu z njihovo zakonodajo ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjuje določb iz členov 4, 7, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 in 23 te uredbe .
Member States shall take enforcement measures with respect to a fishing vessel flying their flag, where it has been established, in accordance with their law that the vessel does not comply with Articles 4, 7, 8, 9, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 23 of this Regulation .
Odvisno od resnosti kršitve in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ukrepi vključujejo zlasti:
The measures shall include, depending on the gravity of the offence and in accordance with their national law:
(a) kazni , ki odražajo vrednost ulova in ohranitveno stanje vrst ;
(a) fines reflecting the value of the catches and the conservation status of the species ;
(b) zaseg nezakonitega ribiškega orodja in ulovov;
(b) seizure of illegal fishing gear and catches;
(c) sekvestracijo plovila;
(c) sequestration of the vessel;
(d) začasni ali trajni odvzem dovoljenja za ribolov;
(d) suspension or withdrawal of authorisation to fish;
(e) zmanjšanje ali odvzem ribolovne kvote, če je primerno.
(e) reduction or withdrawal of the fishing quota, if applicable.
Kazni predstavljajo najmanj petkratno vrednost ulova, pridobljenega s kršitvijo.
Fines shall represent at least five times the value of the catches obtained through infringement.
Če se huda kršitev ponovi v obdobju petih let, se finančne kazni povišajo na najmanj osemkratno vrednost ulova, pridobljenega s kršitvijo.
In the case of a repeated serious infringement within a five-year period, the financial penalties shall be increased to an amount that is at least eight times the value of the catches obtained through infringement.
Vsaka država članica, ki je pristojna za območje, na katerem je ribogojnica za modroplavutega tuna, sprejme izvršilne ukrepe v zvezi z ribogojnico, za katero je bilo v skladu z njeno zakonodajo ugotovljeno, da ne izpolnjuje določb iz členov 24 in 31(2) te uredbe ter členov 4a, 4b in 4c Uredbe (ES) št. 1936/2001.
Each Member State within the jurisdiction of which the bluefin tuna farm is located shall take enforcement measures with respect to that farm, where it has been established, in accordance with its law, that the farm does not comply with Articles 24 and 31(2) of this Regulation and Article 4a, 4b and 4c of Regulation (EC) No 1936/2001.
Odvisno od resnosti kršitve in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo ukrepi vključujejo zlasti:
The measures shall include, depending on the gravity of the offence and in accordance with the national law:
(a) kazni , ki odražajo vrednost rib in ohranitveno stanje vrst ;
(a) fines reflecting the value of the fish and the conservation status of the species ;
(b) začasno ali trajno črtanje iz registra ribogojnic za pitanje;
(b) suspension or withdrawal from the fattening farms record;
(c) prepoved reje količin modroplavutega tuna v mrežasti kletki ali dajanja količin modroplavutega tuna na trg.“
(c) prohibition of caging or marketing quantities of bluefin tuna."
Člen 33 se spremeni tako, da se iz drugega stavka v prvem in drugem odstavku črta „lahko“, vključi se sklic na vrednost in ohranitveno stanje vrst ter vstavijo najnižje ravni kazni (enake finančnim kaznim, ki jih je Parlament sprejel v prvi obravnavi uredbe o lesu).
Amending article 33 in order to change ‘may’ into ‘shall’ in the second sentence of paragraph 1 and 2; to include reference to value and conservation status of species to fines; and to insert minimum level for fines (equal to financial penalties adopted by EP in the first reading on Timber Regulation).
Predlog uredbe – akt o spremembi
Proposal for a regulation-amending act
Člen 1 – točka 18a (novo)
Article 1 – point 18a (new)
Člen 34 – odstavek 3a (novo)
Article 34 – paragraph 3a (new)
(18a) V členu 34 se doda naslednji odstavek:
(18a) In Article 34, the following paragraph is added:
Države članice predpišejo kazni, ki se uporabljajo v primeru trženja tune, ki krši določbe te uredbe, in sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe za zagotovitev, da se te kazni izvajajo.
Member States shall lay down rules on the penalties applicable to trade in tuna that infringes the provisions of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented.
Določene kazni morajo biti učinkovite, sorazmerne in odvračilne ter med drugim vključujejo takojšnji začasni odvzem dovoljenja za trženje.“
The penalties provided for must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and shall include, inter alia, immediate suspension of the authorisation to trade.’
Treba je zagotoviti, da se bo ukrepalo tudi proti trgovcem.
It is necessary to ensure that traders are also subject to enforcement action.
János Áder, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Milan Cabrnoch, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panajotov (Vladko Todorov Panayotov), Gilles Pargneaux, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Carl Schlyter, Teodoros Skilakakis (Theodoros Skylakakis), Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Sabine Wils
János Áder, Kriton Arsenis, Sophie Auconie, Paolo Bartolozzi, Sandrine Bélier, Sergio Berlato, Milan Cabrnoch, Nessa Childers, Chris Davies, Bairbre de Brún, Esther de Lange, Anne Delvaux, Bas Eickhout, Edite Estrela, Jill Evans, Elisabetta Gardini, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Françoise Grossetête, Satu Hassi, Jolanta Emilia Hibner, Dan Jørgensen, Karin Kadenbach, Christa Klaß, Holger Krahmer, Jo Leinen, Corinne Lepage, Peter Liese, Kartika Tamara Liotard, Radvilė Morkūnaitė-Mikulėnienė, Miroslav Ouzký, Vladko Todorov Panayotov, Gilles Pargneaux, Antonyia Parvanova, Mario Pirillo, Pavel Poc, Vittorio Prodi, Frédérique Ries, Anna Rosbach, Oreste Rossi, Carl Schlyter, Theodoros Skylakakis, Claudiu Ciprian Tănăsescu, Salvatore Tatarella, Anja Weisgerber, Åsa Westlund, Sabine Wils
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o zaščiti geografskih označb za kmetijske proizvode in živila
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (09737/2011),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (09737/2011),
– ob upoštevanju Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in Gruzijo o zaščiti geografskih označb za kmetijske proizvode in živila (09738/2011),
– having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (09738/2011),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve po soglasju, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 207(4), prvi pododstavek, členom 218(6), drugi pododstavek, točka (a)(v), in členom 218(7) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7–0202/2011 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Articles 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7‑ 0202/2011),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za mednarodno trgovino ( A7-0450/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade ( A7-0450/2011 ),
Evropska unija (EU) in Gruzija sta sklenili sporazum, katerega cilj je vzajemna zaščita geografskih označb (GO), ki zajema številne kmetijske proizvode, kot so siri, olja in masti, kruh in pecivo, sadje, zelenjava, žita, sveže meso in mesni izdelki, sveže ribe in morski sadeži, vina, žgane pijače in pivo.
The European Union (EU) and Georgia have concluded an agreement aiming at mutually protecting the geographical indications (GIs) covering a wide range of agricultural products such as cheeses, oils and fats, bread and pastry, fruit, vegetables, cereals, fresh meats and meat products, fresh fish and seafood, wines, spirits and beers.
Ta sporazum je ukrep, ki sta ga sprejela oba partnerja, kot je predvideno v Sporazumu o partnerstvu in sodelovanju, ki je začel veljati 1. julija 1999.
This Agreement is a step taken by both partners as foreseen in the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement which entered into force on 1 July 1999.
Omogočil ga je pristop Gruzije k Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji (STO) leta 2000.
It has been made possible by the accession of Georgia to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2000.
Velja za prvi tovrstni dvostranski sporazum o zaščiti GO, ki je bil sklenjen s partnerjem iz evropske soseščine.
It has been described as a bilateral agreement for the protection of GIs which is the first of this kind with a partner from the European Neighbourhood.
Gruzija je kot članica STO podpisnica Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine (TRIPS) že od svojega pristopa.
Indeed, Georgia, as a Member of the WTO, has been a party to the Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) since its accession.
Zato priznava pojem GO kot krajevna imena, ki se uporabljajo za prepoznavanje izvora, kakovosti, slovesa ali drugih značilnosti proizvodov.
So it recognizes the notion of GIs as place names used to identify the origin and quality, reputation or other characteristics of products.
Tako sta EU in Gruzija imeli možnost poiskati skupno stališče za sklenitev sporazuma, ki bi spodbujal trgovanje s kmetijskimi proizvodi in živili, ki izvirajo iz Gruzije in EU, obenem pa upošteval značilnosti izvora in kakovosti proizvodov, ki prihajajo iz obeh podpisnic.
Thereby, the EU and Georgia have had the possibility of building of this common understanding to establish an agreement that should foster trade in agricultural products and foodstuffs originating in the territories of both Georgia and the EU, while respecting the characteristics of quality and origin of products coming from both partners.
Sporazum je celosten in združljiv z obveznostmi, ki izhajajo iz Sporazuma o trgovinskih vidikih pravic intelektualne lastnine.
The Agreement is comprehensive and compatible with commitments taken under the TRIPS agreement.
Sporazum obema partnerjema prinaša posebne prednosti:
The Agreement presents specifics assets for both partners:
· Na strani EU bi ta dvostranski sporazum moral zagotoviti, da bo v Gruziji zaščitenih okrog 820 prehranskih GO, 1930 vin in 320 žganih pijač (iz 23 držav članic), ki jih je registrirala EU, to pa zaradi upoštevanja njenih posebnosti in kakovosti zelo pomirjujoče vpliva na kmetijsko proizvodnjo EU.
· On the EU side, this bilateral agreement should ensure that around 820 food GIs, 1,930 wines and 320 spirits (from 23 Member states) registered by the EU will be protected in Georgia, which is very reassuring for EU agricultural production through the respect of its characteristics and of its quality.
Ta sporazum je mogoče razumeti tudi kot pozitiven korak v smeri širjenja trgovinskih odnosov med EU in Gruzijo.
This Agreement can also be seen as a positive step for the wider EU-Georgia trade relations.
EU je julija 2010 z Gruzijo začela pogajanja o pridružitvenem sporazumu, ki bi moral vključevati tudi trgovinsko komponento, tj. o poglobljenem in celovitem sporazumu o prosti trgovini (DCFTA).
Indeed the EU started in July 2010 negotiating with Georgia a bilateral Association Agreement, which should have a trade component, ie a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement (DCFTA).
Pred začetkom pogajanj o sporazumu DCFTA Evropska komisija pričakuje ključna priporočila (ki so določena kot del vzhodnega partnerstva in ki jih je potrdil Svet), ki jih mora Gruzija izpolniti, da bi zagotovili, da ima ta vzhodni partner pravne in institucionalne zmogljivosti za izvajanje sporazuma DCFTA.
Before entering into negotiations of a DCFTA, the European Commission expects a set of Key Recommendations (set as part of the Eastern Partnership and endorsed by the Council) to be fulfilled by Georgia to ensure that this Eastern Partner has the legal and institutional capacity to implement a DCFTA.
Sporazum o GO tako Gruziji omogoča, da se pogaja z EU in da z njo sklene pomemben sporazum o ključnem vprašanju, povezanem s trgovino, vključno s tehničnimi obveznostmi.
This Agreement on GIs therefore establishes the capacity of Georgia to negotiate and conclude with the EU a substantial agreement on a key trade-related issue, including technical commitments.
· Kar zadeva Gruzijo, pa v tej državi v času pogajanj ni bilo registriranih prehranskih GO.
· On the Georgian side, this country did not have any registered food GIs at the time of the negotiations at the time of the negotiations.
GO so imela samo vina.
Its only GIs regarded wines.
Zato je v Prilogah k Sporazumu, v katerih je seznam prehrambenih proizvodov, vin in žganih pijač iz EU in Gruzije, katerih geografske označbe morajo biti zaščitene v Gruziji oziroma v EU, za Gruzijo navedenih samo 18 GO, vse pa so za vina.
Thus the Annexes of the Agreement, in which appears the list of EU and Georgian food products, wines and spirits, whose geographic indications must be protected respectively in Georgia and the EU, hold only 18 GIs for Georgia, all in wines.
Vinski sektor je izjemno pomemben, saj je ta dejavnost ena najstarejših strok v Gruziji.
The wine sector is particularly important as this activity gathers one of the oldest fields of expertise in Georgia.
Ta vina so navadno namenjena ruskemu trgu, danes pa jih proizvajajo nekatere družbe iz EU, ki so investirale v gruzijsko industrijo vin in žganih pijač.
Usually destined for the Russian market, these wines are now manufactured by some EU groups which have invested in the Georgian wine and spirit industry.
Priznavanje gruzijskih GO in vin bo vsekakor pozitivno vplivalo na gospodarsko dejavnost tega sektorja.
The recognition of Georgian GIs in wines will certainly affect positively the economy of that sector.
Ker je gruzijsko kmetijstvo tipičen samooskrbni sektor, od katerega je odvisno preživetje polovice gruzijskega prebivalstva, je dobrodošel vsak ukrep, ki povečuje možnosti za izvoz kmetijskih proizvodov, če lokalnih proizvajalcev ne obremeni pretirano z nepotrebnimi dodatnimi stroški.
Besides, given that the Georgian agriculture is a typical subsistence sector, on which the livelihood of half of the Georgian population depends, every step to enhance export prospects of agricultural products is welcome, if it does not overburden local producers with unnecessary additional costs.
Glavni kraji namembnosti izvoza gruzijskih kmetijskih proizvodov ostajajo trgi Skupnosti neodvisnih držav (SND), predvsem Rusija.
The main export destinations of agricultural exports from Georgia remain the CIS (Community of Independent States) markets, above all Russia.
Toda v zadnjih 10 letih so vedno več vina, lešnikov in mineralne vode izvažali v EU.
But, over the last 10 years, an increasing amount of wine, hazelnuts and mineral water has been exported to the EU.
Posledično se je delež EU kot izvoznega trga za gruzijske kmetijske proizvode štirikrat povečal, z 10 % v letu 1997 na 40 % leta 2007, in sporazum bi moral ta trend še okrepiti.
Consequently, the share of the EU as an export market for Georgia's agricultural products has been multiplied by four, from 10% in 1997 to 40% in 2007, and this agreement should reinforce this trend.
Z ozirom na zgoraj navedeno poročevalec priporoča, da Parlament poda soglasje k sklenitvi Sporazuma.
For these reasons, your rapporteur recommends Parliament to give its consent to this agreement.
William (grof) Dartmouthski (William (The Earl of) Dartmouth), Laima Liucija Andrikienė, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Franck Proust, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Keith Taylor, Iuliu Winkler, Pablo Zalba Bidegain
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Yannick Jadot, Metin Kazak, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Franck Proust, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Keith Taylor, Iuliu Winkler, Pablo Zalba Bidegain
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o izvajanju okrepljenega sodelovanja na področju uvedbe enotnega patentnega varstva
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitary patent protection
MNENJE Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko .............................27
OPINION of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ...............29
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2011)0215 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0215 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 118 (1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7‑0099/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 118(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0099/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ( A7-0001/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ( A7-0001/2012 ),
(7) Uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva mora temeljiti na zagotavljanju enotnega učinka evropskih patentov po njihovi podelitvi na podlagi te uredbe v sodelujočih državah članicah.
(7) The creation of unitary patent protection should be achieved by giving unitary effect to European patents in the post-grant phase by virtue of this Regulation and in respect of the participating Member States.
Glavna značilnost evropskih patentov z enotnim učinkom mora biti njihov enoten značaj, tj. morajo zagotavljati enotno varstvo in imeti enakovreden učinek v vseh sodelujočih državah članicah.
The main feature of European patents with unitary effect should be their unitary character, i.e. providing uniform protection and having equal effect in all participating Member States.
Zato se lahko evropski patent z enotnim učinkom omeji, licencira, prenese, razveljavi ali izteče le v vseh sodelujočih državah članicah.
Consequently, a European patent with unitary effect should only be limited, licensed, transferred, revoked or lapse in respect of all the participating Member States.
Za zagotovitev enotnega vsebinskega obsega varstva, ki ga zagotavlja enotno patentno varstvo, imajo lahko enotni učinek le evropski patenti, ki so bili podeljeni za vse sodelujoče države članice na podlagi enakih zahtevkov.
To ensure the uniform substantive scope of protection conferred by unitary patent protection, only European patents that have been granted for all the participating Member States with the same set of claims should benefit from unitary effect.
Vendar mora v primeru omejitve ali razveljavitve na podlagi tega, da ne gre za novost v skladu s členom 54(3) EPK, omejitev ali razveljavitev evropskega patenta z enotnim učinkom zaradi zagotovitve pravne varnosti veljati le v sodelujoči(-h) državi(-ah) članici(-ah), imenovani(-h) v prejšnji prijavi za evropski patent , kot je bila objavljena .
However, to ensure legal certainty in the event of a limitation or revocation on the ground of lack of novelty pursuant to Article 54(3) EPC, the limitation or revocation of a European patent with unitary effect should take effect only in respect of the participating Member State(s) designated in the earlier European patent application as published.
Poleg tega mora biti enotni učinek evropskega patenta dodaten, zato mora prenehati obstajati ali se mora omejiti, če je osnovni evropski patent razveljavljen ali omejen.
Finally, the unitary effect attributed to a European patent should have an accessory nature and should cease to exist or be limited to the extent that the basic European patent has been revoked or limited.
(7) Uvedba enotnega patentnega varstva mora temeljiti na zagotavljanju enotnega učinka evropskih patentov po njihovi podelitvi na podlagi te uredbe v vseh sodelujočih državah članicah.
(7) The creation of unitary patent protection should be achieved by giving unitary effect to European patents in the post-grant phase by virtue of this Regulation and in respect of all the participating Member States.
Zato se lahko evropski patent z enotnim učinkom omeji, prenese, razveljavi ali izteče le v vseh sodelujočih državah članicah.
Consequently, a European patent with unitary effect should only be limited, transferred, revoked or lapse in respect of all the participating Member States.
Evropski patent z enotnim učinkom bi moralo biti možno licencirati za celotno ozemlje ali del ozemlja sodelujočih držav članic.
It should be possible for a European patent with unitary effect to be licensed in respect of the whole or part of the territories of the participating Member States.
(9a) Ta uredba ne ureja vprašanja obveznih licenc.
(9a) The matter of compulsory licences is not covered by this Regulation.