natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
(6b) Člen 6 Listine in člen 5 EKČP zagotavljata pravico do svobode in varnosti, omejitve te pravice pa ne smejo presegati tistih, ki so dovoljene v členu 5 EKČP in izhajajo iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
(6b) Article 6 of the Charter and Article 5 ECHR enshrine the rights to liberty and security, the limitations to which may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR in the wording of its Article 5 and inferred from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
(7) Čeprav so vse države članice pogodbenice EKČP ▌, izkušnje kažejo, da to samo po sebi vedno ne zagotavlja zadostne stopnje zaupanja v sisteme kazenskega pravosodja drugih držav članic.
(7) Although Member States are parties to the ECHR ▌, experience has shown that this in itself does not always provide a sufficient degree of trust in the criminal justice systems of other Member States.
(8) Krepitev medsebojnega zaupanja zahteva podrobna pravila o varovanju procesnih pravic in jamstev, ki izhajajo iz Listine in iz EKČP ▌.
(8) Strengthening mutual trust requires detailed rules on the protection of the procedural rights and guarantees stemming from the Charter and from the ECHR ▌.
(9) Člen 82(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije določa, da se določijo minimalna pravila, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah in ki olajšajo vzajemno priznavanje sodb in sodnih odločb ter policijsko in pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah s čezmejnimi posledicami.
(9) Article 82(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union provides for the establishment of minimum rules applicable in the Member States so as to facilitate mutual recognition of judgments and judicial decisions and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters having a cross-border dimension.
Točka (b) člena 82(2) določa, da so „pravice posameznikov v kazenskem postopku“ eno izmed področij, na katerih se lahko določijo minimalna pravila.
Point (b) of Article 82(2) refers to "the rights of individuals in criminal procedure" as one of the areas in which minimum rules may be established.
(10) Skupna minimalna pravila morajo voditi do okrepljenega zaupanja v sisteme kazenskega pravosodja vseh držav članic, kar mora po drugi strani voditi do učinkovitejšega pravosodnega sodelovanja v duhu medsebojnega zaupanja ▌.
(10) Common minimum rules should lead to increased confidence in the criminal justice systems of all Member States, which in turn should lead to more efficient judicial cooperation in a climate of mutual trust ▌.
Taka skupna minimalna pravila se morajo uporabljati za obveščanje v kazenskem postopku.
Such common minimum rules should apply to information in criminal proceedings.
(11) Svet je 30. novembra 2009 sprejel Načrt za krepitev procesnih pravic osumljenih ali obtoženih oseb v kazenskem postopku (v nadaljnjem besedilu „načrt“)
(11) On 30 November 2009, the Council adopted the Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected and accused persons in criminal proceedings ("the Roadmap")
UL C 295, 4.12.2009, str.
OJ C 295, 4.12.2009, p.
Na podlagi pristopa "korak za korakom" je v načrtu predvideno sprejetje ukrepov glede pravice do prevajanja in tolmačenja, pravice do obveščenosti o pravicah in obtožbah, pravice do pravnega svetovanja in pravne pomoči, pravice do komuniciranja s sorodniki, delodajalci in konzularnimi organi ter glede posebnega varstva za osumljence ali obtožence, ki spadajo v skupino ranljivih oseb.
Taking a step-by-step approach, the Roadmap calls for the adoption of measures regarding the right to translation and interpretation, the right to information on rights and information about the accusation , the right to legal advice and legal aid, the right to communication with relatives, employers and consular authorities, and regarding special safeguards for suspected or accused persons who are vulnerable.
V načrtu je poudarjeno, da je vrstni red pravic samo okviren, kar pomeni, da se lahko spreminja glede na prednostne naloge.
The Roadmap emphasises that the order of the rights is indicative only and thus implies that it may be changed according to priorities.
Zasnovan je tako, da deluje kot celota; njegove koristi bodo v celoti opazne šele, ko bodo izvedeni vsi ukrepi.
It is designed to operate as a whole; only when all its component parts have been implemented will its benefits be felt in full.
(12) Evropski svet je ▌11. decembra 2009 pozdravil načrt in ga vključil v stockholmski program (točka 2.4)
(12) ▌ On 11 December 2009, the European Council welcomed the Roadmap and made it part of the Stockholm Programme (point 2.4.)
UL C 115, 4.5.10, str.
OJ C 115, 4.5.2010, p.
Poudaril je, da načrt še ni končan, ter pozval Komisijo, naj prouči še druge vidike minimalnih procesnih pravic osumljencev ali obtožencev in oceni, ali je treba za boljše sodelovanje na tem področju proučiti tudi druga vprašanja, na primer domnevo nedolžnosti.
The European Council underlined the non-exhaustive character of the Roadmap, by inviting the Commission to examine further aspects of minimum procedural rights for suspected and accused persons, and to assess whether other issues, for instance the presumption of innocence, need to be addressed, in order to promote better cooperation in this area.
(13) Prvi ukrep v načrtu je Direktiva 2010/64/EU Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 20. oktobra 2010 o pravici do tolmačenja in prevajanja v kazenskih postopkih
(13) The first measure on the Roadmap is Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and to translation in criminal proceedings
UL L 280, 26.10.2010 .
OJ L 280, 26.10.2010. .
(14) Ta direktiva se nanaša na ukrep B načrta.
(14) This Directive relates to measure B of the Roadmap.
Z namenom krepitve medsebojnega zaupanja med državami članicami določa skupne minimalne standarde na področju obveščanja o pravicah in obtožbi, ki se zagotovijo osebam, osumljenim ali obtoženim storitve kaznivega dejanja.
It lays down common minimum standards to be applied in the field of information about rights and about the accusation to be given to persons suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence, with a view to enhancing mutual trust among Member States.
Direktiva izhaja iz pravic, določenih v Listini o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členih 6, 47 in 48, ter nadgrajuje člena 5 in 6 EKČP, kakor ju razlaga Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice.
The Directive builds on the rights laid down in the Charter, and in particular its Articles 6, 47 and 48 by building upon Articles 5 and 6 ECHR as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights.
Komisija je v svojem sporočilu z naslovom Zagotavljanje območja svobode, varnosti in pravice za državljane Evrope – Akcijski načrt izvajanja stockholmskega programa
In its Communication "Delivering an area of freedom, security and justice for Europe's citizens", the Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme
KOM (2010)0171, 20.4.2010. , za leto 2010 napovedala predložitev predloga o pravici do obveščenosti.
COM(2010)0171 , 20.4.2010. , the Commission announced the presentation of a proposal on the right to information in 2010.
(14a) Direktiva bi se morala uporabljati za osumljence in obtožence na ozemlju EU, ne glede na njihov pravni status, državljanstvo ali nacionalnost.
(14a) This Directive should apply to suspected and accused persons regardless of their legal status, citizenship or nationality.
(15) V nekaterih državah članicah je organ, ki ni sodišče, pristojno za kazenske zadeve, pristojen naložiti sankcije za relativno manjše kršitve.
(15) In some Member States an authority other than a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters has competence for imposing sanctions in relation to relatively minor offences.
To se na primer lahko zgodi pri ponavljajočih se prometnih prekrških, ki se lahko ugotovijo pri opravljanju kontrol v prometu.
That may be the case, for example, in relation to traffic offences which are committed on a large scale and which might be established following a traffic control.
V takih okoliščinah bi bilo od pristojnega organa nerazumno zahtevati, da zagotovi spoštovanje vseh pravic iz te direktive.
In such situations, it would be unreasonable to require that the competent authority ensure all the rights under this Directive.
Kadar pravo države članice določa, da sankcije za manjše prekrške naloži tak organ in bodisi obstaja pravica do pritožbe ali pa je možna predložitev zadeve sodišču, pristojnemu za kazenske zadeve, bi se ta direktiva morala zato uporabljati le za postopke pred tem sodiščem po vložitvi pritožbe ali predložitvi zadeve.
Where the law of a Member State provides for the imposition of a sanction regarding minor offences by such an authority and there is either a right of appeal or the possibility for the case to be otherwise referred to a court having jurisdiction in criminal matters, this Directive should therefore apply only to the proceedings before that court following such an appeal or referral .
(16) Pravica do obveščenosti o procesnih pravicah (ki izhaja iz sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice) bi morala biti izrecno zagotovljena v Direktivi. ▌
(16) The right to information about procedural rights (which is inferred from the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights) should be explicitly established by this Directive. ▌
(17) Osumljenca ali obtoženca bi morali pristojni organi brez odlašanja obvestiti o pravicah po nacionalnem pravu, ki so bistvenega pomena za zagotovitev pravičnega postopka, in sicer ustno ali v pisni obliki, kot določa ta direktiva.
(17) The suspected or accused person should be ▌informed promptly by the competent authorities of those rights, as they apply under national law, which are essential to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings, be it orally or in writing as provided for by this Directive.
O teh pravicah bi morale biti osumljene ali obtožene osebe obveščene pravočasno med postopkom, najkasneje pred prvim uradnim zaslišanjem pred policijo ali drugim pristojnim organom, s čimer bi se zagotovilo njihovo praktično in učinkovito izvajanje.
In order to allow a practical and effective exercise of these rights of the suspected or accused person, the information should be provided promptly in the course of the proceedings and at the latest before the first official interview of the suspected or the accused person by the police or another competent authority .
(18) Ta direktiva določa minimalna pravila o obveščenosti o pravicah osumljene ali obtožene osebe.
(18) This Directive lays down minimum rules with respect to the information on rights of the suspected or accused person.
To ne posega v obveščanje o drugih procesnih pravicah, ki izhajajo iz Listine, EKČP, nacionalnega prava in veljavne zakonodaje EU, kakor jo razlagajo pristojna sodišča in tribunali.
This is without prejudice to information to be given on other procedural rights stemming from the Charter, the ECHR, national law and applicable EU legislation as interpreted by the relevant courts and tribunals.
Kadar se oseba obvesti o posamezni pravici, je pristojnim organom ni treba ponovno poudarjati, razen če bi to zahtevale posebne okoliščine zadeve ali posebna pravila nacionalnega prava.
Once the information about a particular right has been provided, it is understood that the competent authorities should not be required to reiterate it, unless the specific circumstances of the case or the specific rules laid down in national law so require .
(18a) Ko ta direktiva podeljuje pravice osumljenim ali obtoženim osebam, ki so prijete ali pridržane, bi bilo treba to razumeti kot vsako situacijo, v kateri je osebi tekom kazenskega postopka odvzeta prostost v smislu člena 5(1)(c) EKČP, kakor to razlaga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
(18a) Where this Directive confers rights on suspected and accused persons who are arrested or detained, this should be understood as any situation where, in the course of criminal proceedings, the person is deprived of his liberty within the meaning of Article 5(1)(c) ECHR as interpreted by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
(19) Kadar je osumljenec ali obtoženec prijet ali pridržan , ga je treba o veljavnih procesnih pravicah ▌obvestiti s pisnim obvestilom o pravicah, napisanim na lahko razumljiv način, da se pripomore k temu , da svoje pravice dejansko razume.
(19) Where a suspected or accused person is arrested or detained , information about applicable procedural rights should be given by means of a written Letter of Rights drafted in an easily comprehensible manner so as to assist the actual understanding of his rights.
Pisno obvestilo o pravicah je treba takoj izročiti vsaki prijeti osebi, ko ji je med kazenskim postopkom in s posegom organov kazenskega pregona odvzeta prostost.
Such a Letter of Rights should be provided promptly to each arrested person when he is deprived of liberty by the intervention of law enforcement authorities in the context of criminal proceedings.
Moralo bi vsebovati temeljne informacije o možnostih izpodbijanja zakonitosti prijetja, ponovnega pregleda pridržanja ali možnostih, da se zaprosi za začasni izpust, če in kolikor te pravice obstajajo v nacionalnem pravu.
It should include basic information concerning any possibility to challenge the lawfulness of the arrest, to obtain a review of the detention, or to ask for provisional release, where, and to the extent that, such a right exists in national law.
V pomoč državam članicam pri pripravi takega obvestila o pravicah ▌je v Prilogi I k Direktivi vzorec obvestila o pravicah, ki ga lahko uporabijo države članice.
To help Member States design such a Letter of Rights ▌ , a model of the Letter of Rights, which Member States may use, is provided in Annex I to this Directive.
Vzorec je primer in se ga lahko spreminja v okviru poročila o izvajanju, ki ga Evropska komisija predloži v skladu s členom 12 Direktive, ko bodo začeli veljati vsi načrtovani ukrepi.
This model is indicative and may be subject to review in the context of the report on implementation to be presented by the Commission pursuant to Article 12 of this Directive and also once all the Roadmap measures have come into force.
Dejansko obvestilo lahko vključuje tudi druge zadevne procesne pravice, ki se uporabljajo v državah članicah.
The actual Letter may also include other relevant procedural rights that apply in Member States.
(19a) Države članice v nacionalnem pravu določijo posebne pogoje in pravila za obveščanje drugih oseb o prijetju ali pridržanju, pri čemer se razume, kar določa tudi načrt, in sicer, da izvrševanje te pravice ne bi smelo posegati v potek kazenskega postopka.
(19a) The specific conditions and rules for informing one other person about the arrest or detention are to be determined by the Member States in their national law, it being understood, as set out in the Roadmap, that the exercise of this right should not prejudice the due course of the criminal proceedings.
(19b) Ta direktiva ne posega v določbe nacionalnega prava o varnosti oseb, ki se nahajajo v prostorih za izvrševanje ukrepa odvzema prostosti.
(19b) This Directive is without prejudice to the provisions of national law concerning safety of persons remaining in detention facilities.
(19c) Države članice bi morale zagotoviti, da se pri obveščanju osumljene ali obtožene osebe v skladu s to direktivo tej osebi po potrebi nudi prevajanje in tolmačenje v jezik, ki ga razume, v skladu z merili iz direktive 2010/64/EU.
(19c) Member States should ensure that, when providing information in accordance with this Directive, the suspected or accused person should be provided, where necessary, with translation and interpretation in a language he understands, in accordance with the standards set out in Directive 2010/64/EU.
(19d) Pristojni organi bi morali pri obveščanju osumljenca ali obtoženca v skladu s to direktivo posebno pozornost nameniti osumljencem ali obtožencem, ki ne morejo razumeti vsebine ali pomenu informacij ali jima slediti, na primer zaradi mladosti ter psihičnega ali fizičnega stanja.
(19d) When providing the suspected or accused person with information in accordance with this Directive, competent authorities should pay particular attention to suspected or accused person who cannot understand or follow the content or the meaning of the information, owing, for example, to their young age, mental or physical condition.
(20) Osebo, obtoženo storitve kaznivega dejanja, je treba obvestiti o vseh informacijah v zvezi z obtožbo, da lahko pripravi svojo obrambo in da je zajamčena poštenost postopka.
(20) A person accused of having committed a criminal offence should be given all the information on the accusation necessary to enable him to prepare his defence and to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings.
Člen 6(1) EKČP uporablja besedo „obtožba“.
Article 6(1) ECHR employs the term "charge".
V tej direktivi se zaradi skladnosti za ponazoritev tega pojma skozi vse besedilo uporablja beseda „obtožba“.
In this Directive, for reasons of consistency of the text, the term "accusation" is used throughout the text to describe the same concept.
(21) Osumljeno ali obtoženo osebo bi bilo treba nemudoma obvestiti o kaznivem dejanju, za katerega je osumljena, najkasneje pred prvim uradnim zaslišanjem osumljene ali obtožene osebe pred policijo ali drugim pristojnim organom, in brez poseganja v potek preiskave.
(21) The information to the suspected or accused person about the criminal act he is suspected of having committed should be given promptly, and at the latest before the first official interview of the suspected or the accused person by the police or another competent authority, and without prejudicing the course of ongoing investigations.
Treba je podati dovolj podroben opis dejanj, katerih je oseba osumljena ali obtožena, vključno s časom in krajem, če sta znana, pa tudi po možnosti s pravno kvalifikacijo domnevnega kaznivega dejanja, pri čemer je treba upoštevati fazo postopka, da se zaščiti poštenost postopka in omogoči učinkovito izvrševanje pravic obrambe.
A description of the facts the person is suspected or accused of having committed including, where known, the time and place, as well as the possible legal classification of the alleged offence should be given in enough detail, in relation to the phase of the proceedings when it is given to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings and allow for an effective exercise of the right of defence .
(22) Če se tekom kazenskega postopka posamezni elementi obtožbe spremenijo do te mere, da to bistveno vpliva na položaj osumljene ali obtožene osebe, je treba to osebo o tem obvestiti, če je to potrebno, da se zaščiti poštenost postopka, ter pravočasno, da se omogoči učinkovito izvrševanje pravic obrambe.
(22) When in the course of the criminal proceedings the details of the accusation change to the extent that the position of the suspected or accused person is substantially affected, this should be communicated to him when necessary to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings and in due time to allow for an effective exercise of the right of defence .
(23) Listine in, kjer je to ustrezno, fotografije ter avdio in videoposnetki, ki so v skladu z nacionalnim pravom bistveni za učinkovito izpodbijanje zakonitosti prijetja ali pridržanja osumljene ali obtožene osebe, bi morali biti na voljo tej osebi ali njenemu odvetniku najkasneje pred trenutkom, ko bo pristojni sodni organ odločal o zakonitosti prijetja ali pridržanja v skladu s členom 5(4) EKČP, ter pravočasno, da se omogoči učinkovito izvrševanje pravice do izpodbijanja zakonitosti prijetja ali pridržanja.
(23) Documents and, where appropriate, photographs, audio and videorecordings, which in accordance with national law are essential to effectively challenge the lawfulness of an arrest or detention of the suspected or accused person, should be made available to him or to his lawyer at the latest before the moment when a competent judicial authority will be called to decide upon the lawfulness of the arrest or detention in accordance with Article 5(4) ECHR, and in due time to allow the effective exercise of the right to challange the lawfullness of arrest or detention .
(24) Za namene te direktive bi moral dostop do materialnih dokazov, kot so opredeljeni v nacionalnem pravu, s katerimi razpolagajo pristojni organi v zvezi s posamezno kazensko zadevo in so bodisi v prid ali škodo osumljencu ali obtožencu, vključevati dostop do gradiva, kot so listine in, kjer je to ustrezno, fotografije ter avdio in videoposnetki.
(24) For the purpose of this Directive, access to the material evidence, as defined in national law, which is for or against the suspected or accused person and in the possession of the competent authorities in relation to the specific criminal case, should include access to materials such as documents, and where appropriate photographs, audio and video recordings.
Takšne informacije so bodisi zajete v spisu ali pa jih pristojni organi hranijo na kakšen drugačen način v skladu z nacionalnim pravom.
Such information may be contained in a case file or otherwise held by competent authorities in any appropriate way in accordance with national law .
(24a) Dostop do materialnih dokazov, v prid ali proti obtoženemu, ki so v posesti pristojnih organov, kakor to določa ta direktiva, se lahko zavrne v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo, če bi to lahko povzročilo resno nevarnost za temeljne pravice druge osebe ali če je to nujno potrebno za zaščito pomembnega javnega interesa.
(24a) Access to the material evidence for or against the accused in the possession of the competent authorities, as provided for under this Directive, may be refused, according to national law, if this may lead to the serious risk for the fundamental rights of another person or if strictly necessary to safeguard an important public interest.
To je treba pretehtati glede na pravico do obrambe osumljenca ali obtoženca ob upoštevanju različnih stopenj postopka.
This must be weighed against the right of defence of the suspected or accused person, taking into account the different phases of the proceedings.
Te omejitve bi bilo treba razlagati dosledno in v skladu z načelom pravice do poštenega sojenja, kot jo določa EKČP in razlaga sodna praksa Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.
These limitations should be interpreted strictly and in accordance with the principle of the right to a fair trial as provided by the ECHR and interpreted by case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.
(24b) Pravica do dostopa do gradiva zadeve ne bi smela posegati v določbe nacionalnega prava o varstvu osebnih podatkov in podatkov o tem, kje se nahajajo zaščitene priče.
(24b) The right to access to the materials of the case should be without prejudice to the provisions of national law concerning the protection of personal data and whereabouts of protected witnesses.
(24c) Vpogled v gradivo o zadevi bi moral biti v skladu s to direktivo brezplačen.
(24c) Consultation of the materials of the case, as provided for by this Directive, should be provided free of charge.
To ne posega v določbe nacionalnega prava držav članic, ki določajo plačilo pristojbin za izdajo dvojnikov iz spisa ali stroške pošiljanja gradiva zadevni osebi oziroma njenemu odvetniku.
This is without prejudice to provisions of the national laws of the Member States requiring payment of any fees for copies to be extracted from the case file or for the sending costs to the person concerned or his lawyer.
(24d) Obveščanje v skladu s to direktivo bi bilo treba zabeležiti v skladu z obstoječimi postopki evidentiranja po nacionalnem pravu držav članic, brez obveznosti, da se uvedejo novi mehanizmi ali dodatna upravna bremena.
(24d) The provision of information in accordance with this Directive should be noted in accordance with existing recording procedures under the national law of the Member States, without any additional obligation to introduce new mechanisms or additional administrative burden.