natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker pri Svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji zatrjujejo, da je na svetovni ravni eden od desetih farmacevtskih izdelkov ponarejen, in ker je so se v Parizu srečali voditelji Evropske zveze združenj farmacevtske industrije, da bi poiskali protiukrepe za zajezitev tega pojava, ki je zlasti prisoten na svetovnem spletu,
whereas the WHO states that, worldwide, one pharmaceutical product in ten is counterfeit and whereas in Paris leaders of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) have met to consider counter-measures to check the phenomenon, which is particularly common on the Internet,
ker 28% ponaredkov zadeva antibiotike, 11% hormone, 8% zdravila proti alergiji in 7% zdravila proti malariji,
whereas 28% of counterfeit drugs are presented as antibiotics, 11% as hormones, 8% as antiallergy drugs and 7% as antimalarials,
ker je med državami, kjer se proizvajajo ponarejeni farmacevtski izdelki, vodilna Kitajska, od koder prihajajo številne necertificirane zdravilne učinkovine, ki naj bi jih vsebovalo več kot 75% generičnih zdravil v Evropi,
whereas the list of countries where counterfeit pharmaceuticals are produced is headed by China, from where many uncertified active principles are derived, and whereas more than 75% of generic pharmaceuticals circulating in Europe are said to use such principles,
zahteva, da Komisija sprejme ukrepe za pomoč delovni skupini IMPACT ter za zagotovitev, da bi testi za odkrivanje ponarejenih farmacevtskih izdelkov s pomočjo identifikacijskih sistemov postali v Evropi obvezni;
Calls on the Commission to take measures to assist the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting Taskforce (IMPACT) and render compulsory in Europe tests which have been developed to unmask counterfeit pharmaceuticals by means of identification systems;
ki ga predlagajo Marian Zlotea, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu in Dragoş Florin David
by Marian Zlotea, Rareş-Lucian Niculescu and Dragoş Florin David
o ustanovitvi urada evropskega varuha otrokovih pravic
on creating the office of a European ombudsman for the rights of the child
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o ustanovitvi urada evropskega varuha otrokovih pravic
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on creating the office of a European ombudsman for the rights of the child
ob upoštevanju zakonodaje Skupnosti o pravicah otrok,
having regard to Community legislation on children's rights,
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah iz leta 1989,
having regard to the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije A5-0223/2001 z dne 5. julija 2001,
having regard to its resolution A5-0223/2001 of 5 July 2001,
ob upoštevanju člena 113(2) svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 113 of its Rules of Procedure,
ker so razmere, ki vključujejo kršitev otrokovih pravic, pogosto zelo hude in lahko ogrožajo otrokovo duševno in telesno zdravje,
whereas situations involving violations of the rights of the child are often particularly serious and may affect children's mental and physical health,
ker je spoštovanje otrokovih pravic temeljnega pomena, še posebej v primerih posilstev ali zlorab,
whereas respect for the rights of the child is crucial, especially in cases of rape or abuse,
ker take razmere zahtevajo hiter odziv, ki temelji na varovanju koristi otroka;
whereas such situations require a rapid response based on safeguarding the child's best interests,
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj sprejmeta ukrepe za ustanovitev urada evropskega varuha otrokovih pravic, katerega naloga je spodbujanje in uporaba konvencij o otrokovih pravicah ter varovanje koristi otrok;
Calls on the Council and Commission to take steps with a view to creating the office of a European ombudsman for the rights of the child, whose role would be to promote and apply the conventions on the rights of the child and safeguard children's best interests;
spodbuja države članice, naj imenujejo nacionalne varuhe otrokovih pravic, če tega doslej še niso storile.
Encourages the Member States to appoint national ombudsmen for the rights of the child, if they have not done so already.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0155/2008
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0155/2008
o sporih med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike pri Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji zaradi domnevnih subvencij Airbusu in Boeingu
on the World Trade Organisation disputes between the European Union and the United States on alleged subsidies to Airbus and Boeing
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporih med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike pri Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji zaradi domnevnih subvencij Airbusu in Boeingu
European Parliament resolution on the World Trade Organisation disputes between the European Union and the United States on alleged subsidies to Airbus and Boeing
ob upoštevanju sporov Svetovne trgovinske organizacije med Evropsko unijo in Združenimi državami Amerike zaradi domnevnih subvencij Airbusu in Boeingu,
having regard to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) disputes between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) on alleged subsidies to Airbus and Boeing,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 1. junija 2006 o transatlantskih gospodarskih odnosih EU–ZDA UL C 298E, 8.12.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 1 June 2006 on EU-US transatlantic economic relations OJ C 298E, 8.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju vrhunskega srečanja EU–ZDA 30. aprila 2007,
having regard to the EU-US Summit of 30 April 2007,
ker ceni transatlantsko partnerstvo med EU in ZDA in na splošno podpira pravične in uravnotežene trgovinske politike,
valuing the transatlantic partnership between the EU and the US and supporting fair and balanced trade policies in general,
ker so v zadnjem desetletju transatlantski gospodarski odnosi doživeli obdobje povezovanja, kakršnega še ni bilo, saj so evropske naložbe v ZDA predstavljale 75 % celotnega ameriškega priliva naložb v letu 2006, naložbe ZDA v Evropi pa so se povečale na rekordnih 128 milijard USD, kar je 59 % celotnega ameriškega tujega neposrednega odliva naložb v letu 2006,
whereas, over the past decade, the transatlantic economic relationship has experienced an unprecedented period of integration, with European investment in the US representing 75% of total US investment inflows in 2006 and US investment in Europe rising to a record USD 128 billion, or 59% of total US foreign direct investment (FDI) outflows, in 2006,
ker je letalska industrija izjemno pomembna za zaposlovanje in ustvarjanje delovnih mest, zlasti v sektorjih, kjer je potrebna visoka usposobljenost delavcev, ter tudi za številne druge sektorje, za regionalni razvoj in za najsodobnejše nadnacionalno industrijsko sodelovanje,
whereas the importance of the aircraft industry for employment and job creation, particularly in high-skilled sectors, as well as in a broad range of other industries, for regional development and for state-of-the-art transnational industrial cooperation is of particular relevance,
ker imata v civilni letalski industriji tako Airbus kot Boeing zmožnost, da oblikujeta in gradita velika komercialna letala, in ker je v interesu letalskih družb in njihovih uporabnikov, da se ohrani visoka stopnja zdrave konkurence,
whereas, in the civil aircraft industry, both Airbus and Boeing presently have the capability to design and integrate large commercial aircraft and it is in the interest of airlines and their customers to maintain a high level of healthy competition,
ker so leta 1992 EU in ZDA podpisale dvostranski sporazum o trgovini velikih civilnih letal (sporazum iz leta 1992), s katerim so bili ustvarjeni enakopravni pogoji s pravili, ki urejajo vladno podporo,
whereas, in 1992, the EU and the US signed a bilateral agreement on trade in large civil aircraft (the 1992 Agreement) that created a balanced playing field with rules governing government support,
ker se je EU strogo držala celotnega sporazuma iz leta 1992 in je redno zagotavljala dokaze, da ga je upoštevala,
whereas the EU has consistently adhered to the spirit and letter of the 1992 Agreement and has regularly provided documented evidence of compliance,
ker so ZDA v veliki meri prezrle svoje dolžnosti iz tega sporazuma, saj niso poročale o subvencioniranju Boeinga, podelile pa so mu tudi subvencije, ki so presegale dogovorjene meje, in nedovoljene subvencije,
whereas the US has largely ignored its obligations under the 1992 Agreement by not reporting its subsidies to Boeing as well as by providing subsidies in excess of agreed limits and by granting prohibited subsidies to Boeing,
ker je bila zaradi sporazuma iz leta 1992 v tem sektorju stabilnost ohranjena do leta 2004, ko so se ZDA enostransko odločile odstopiti od sporazuma in predložiti zadevo Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji zoper EU zaradi evropskega vračljivega financiranja, ki je v celoti v skladu s sporazumom iz leta 1992 in je podobno financiranju Boeinga, namenjeno za razvoj in proizvodnjo velikih delov modela 787 na Japonskem in v drugih državah, ki si delijo tveganje,
whereas the 1992 Agreement maintained stability in the sector until 2004, when the US unilaterally purported to withdraw from it and brought a WTO case against the EU, citing European repayable financing which fully complied with the 1992 Agreement and which is similar to that benefiting Boeing for development and production of large parts of its 787 in Japan and other risk-sharing countries,
ker EU kljub številnim poštenim prizadevanjem doslej ni uspela oblikovati poštene in uravnotežene podlage za sporazumno rešitev,
whereas, despite numerous efforts by the EU in good faith, it has hitherto not been possible to establish a fair and balanced basis for a negotiated settlement,
ponovno izraža svojo podporo Komisiji, ki je bila vedno naklonjena uravnoteženi in sporazumni rešitvi brez pogojevanja,
reaffirming its support for the Commission’s consistent openness to a balanced, negotiated solution without preconditions,
ker je uravnotežena in pravična vladna podpora na letalskem in vesoljskem področju na obeh straneh Atlantika privedla do raziskav in inovacij, večje varnosti, boljše okoljske učinkovitosti ter uspešnosti zračnega prevoza,
whereas balanced and fair government support for aerospace on both sides of the Atlantic has resulted in research and innovation, increased safety, improved environmental performance, and efficiencies in air transportation,
ker je evropsko financiranje Airbusa strogo omejeno, vračljivo z obrestmi in nima nobenega vpliva na konkurenčnost Boeinga, saj je Airbus povrnil 40 %, več kot je prejel od vlad EU od leta 1992, ter je doslej preplačal 7 milijard EUR,
whereas European financing for Airbus is strictly limited, repayable with interest and clearly has no impact on Boeing’s ability to compete, as Airbus repaid 40 % more than it has received from EU governments since 1992 and has repaid in excess of EUR 7 billion so far,
Na Komisijo naslavlja naslednja priporočila v imenu EU za zaščito interesov držav članic in obsežne civilne letalske industrije:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Commission, acting on behalf of the EU in defending the interests of the Member States and the EU large civil aircraft industry:
(a) Parlament ponavlja svoje prepričanje o pomembnosti pravične in odprte konkurence pri javnih razpisih ter je seznanjen s pogodbo, ki je bila dodeljena skupini Northrop Grumman Corporation EADS za program dokapitalizacije zračnih tankerjev na podlagi nepristranskih meril za opredelitev in določitev najboljše in najprimernejše opreme za ameriško letalstvo;
(a) Parliament reaffirms its belief in the importance of fair and open competition in public procurement competitions and notes favorably the contract award to the Northrop Grumman Corporation EADS team for the US aerial tanker recapitalization program based on neutral criteria designed to identify and place the best and most suitable equipment in the hands of the US Air Force (USAF);
(b) vendar Parlament zaskrbljeno opaža ostre napade Boeinga in ameriškega kongresa, ki želita vodstvo EADS in nekatere države članice prikazati kot nezanesljive partnerje na letalskem in vesoljskem področju ter kot varnostno grožnjo za ameriško vojaško pripravljenost;
(b) Parliament, however, notes with deep concern, however, the bitter attacks of Boeing and the US Congress in an attempt to portray EADS operations and certain Member States as unreliable aerospace partners and a security risk to US military readiness;
(c) Parlament prav tako ponavlja svoje prepričanje, da mora biti neoporečnost postopka javnih razpisov ameriškega ministrstva za obrambo, vključno z revizijo GAO, zaščitena za vse konkurente;
(c) Parliament also reaffirms its belief that the integrity of the US Department of Defence procurement process, including the GAO review, must be protected for all competitors;
(d) Parlament poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se bodo EU in države članice primerno odzvale na vse protikonkurenčne ukrepe v zakonodaji ali izvajanih politikah, ki bi neustrezno omejevali konkurenčnost podjetij EU pri civilnih ali vojaških programih, po potrebi za vsak primer posebej;
(d) Parliament calls on the Commission to ensure that any anti-competitive actions in legislation or executive policy that would improperly restrict the ability of EU companies to compete in either civil or military programmes should be met with the appropriate response by the EU and its Member States, if necessary on a case-by-case basis;
(e) Parlament podpira zaščito interesov EU v sedanjem postopku reševanja spora pri Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji in poziva Komisijo, naj si za to še naprej prizadeva; vendar dvomi, da bo odločitev Svetovne trgovinske organizacije zagotovila potrebno dolgoročno rešitev, ki je potrebna za trg kot osnova za prihodnjo mirno in pravično konkurenco v tem sektorju, do česar pa bi lahko privedla sporazumna rešitev;
(e) Parliament supports the defence of EU interests in the pending dispute settlement proceedings before the WTO and urges the Commission to continue its efforts in this regard: it doubts, however, whether WTO rulings in themselves will provide the necessary long-term solution the market requires as a basis for future peaceful and fair competition in this sector which, by contrast, a negotiated solution could deliver;
(f) Parlament meni, da mora biti izhodiščna točka za vse pogovore razprava brez postavljanja pogojev za pogajanja, s čimer bi bila dokazana resnična namera obeh strani glede dosege pragmatičnega ravnotežja med evropsko civilno podporo in ameriško vojaško-industrijsko shemo, kar bi uredilo tiste vidike vladnega posredovanja, ki se dejansko vtikajo v vzpostavitev resnične enakopravnosti.
(f) Parliament considers that the starting point for any talks would need to be a discussion without preconditions on terms of negotiation, demonstrating the genuine intent by both sides to arrive at a pragmatic balance between European civil support and the US military-industrial scheme, which disciplines those aspects of government involvement genuinely impinging on the establishment of a truly level playing field.
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o razvoju kazenskopravnega območja EU
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the development of an EU criminal justice area
ob upoštevanju členov 6, 29, 31(1) ter 34(2)(a) in (b) Pogodbe o EU, listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti členov 47, 48, 49 in 50, ter evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, zlasti členov 5, 6, 7 in 13,
having regard to Articles 6, 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(a) and (b)of the TEU, to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, notably Articles 47, 48, 49 and 50, and to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, notably Articles 5, 6, 7 and 13,
ker je trdno odločen, da je treba spodbuditi dialog o teh zadevah z nacionalnimi parlamenti, civilno družbo in sodnimi organi,
firmly convinced of the need to step up the dialogue on these matters with national Parliaments, civil society and the judicial authorities,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o ustanovitvi foruma za razpravo o politikah in praksah EU na področju pravosodja KOM(2008) 38 konč. in sporočila Komisije o usposabljanju na področju pravosodja v Evropski uniji KOM(2006) 356 konč. ,
having regard to the Communication from the Commission on the creation of a Forum for discussing EU justice policies and practice COM(2008) 38 final. and to the Communication from the Commission on Judicial Training in the EU COM(2006) 356 final. ,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom Za evropsko strategijo na področju e-pravosodja KOM(2008) 329 konč. ,
having regard to the Communication from the Commission 'Towards a European e-Justice Strategy' COM(2008) 329 final. ,
ob upoštevanju prejšnjih priporočil Evropskega parlamenta Priporočilo Svetu in Evropskemu svetu o prihodnosti območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter ukrepih za krepitev njegove legitimnosti in učinkovitosti OJ C 166 E, 7.7.2005, p.
having regard to previous Recommendations by the European Parliament Recommendation to the Council and the European Council on the future of the area of freedom, security and justice as well as on the measures required to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness thereof, OJ C 166 E, 7.7.2005, p.
58-63; priporočilo Svetu o kakovosti kazenskega pravosodja in usklajenosti kazenske zakonodaje v državah članicah, OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
58-63; recommendation to the Council on the quality of criminal justice and the harmonisation of criminal law in the Member States, OJ C 304 E, 1.12.2005, p.
ker želi odkriti najboljši način za razvoj kazenskopravnega območja EU,
with a view to identifying the best way to develop an EU criminal justice area,
ker so za sodstvo jasno pristojne države članice EU na nacionalni ravni,
whereas judicial competences fall clearly within the national domain of the EU Member States,
ker vsakodnevno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah še vedno temelji na instrumentih vzajemnega priznavanja, kot je Konvencija o vzajemni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:197:0001:0023:EN:PDF in Konvencije Sveta Evrope o pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah iz leta 1959 http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/030.htm ,
whereas day-to-day judicial cooperation in criminal matters is still based on mutual assistance instruments such as the 2000 Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2000:197:0001:0023:EN:PDF and the 1959 Council of Europe Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/030.htm ,
ker izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja še zdaleč ni bilo v celoti doseženo, zlasti kar zadeva pridobivanje dokazov v kazenskih postopkih ter postopke za priznavanje ukrepov pred kazenskim postopkom in po njem,
whereas the implementation of the mutual recognition principle is far from having been completely achieved, notably as regards obtaining evidence in criminal proceedings and procedures for recognition of pre-trial and post-trial measures,
ker mora – če želi biti učinkovito – kazenskopravno območje EU izkoristiti nove tehnologije in uporabiti spletna orodja pri izvajanju politik EU,
whereas, in order to be effective, an EU criminal justice area must take advantage of new technologies and use Internet tools in the implementation of EU policies,
ker so varovanje pravic, na primer do pravičnega sojenja, domneva nedolžnosti, pravica do obrambe, pravice žrtev kaznivega dejanja in načelo ne bis in idem bistveni v kazenskih postopkih, pri katerih so ogrožene temeljne pravice,
whereas the protection of rights such as the right to a fair trial, the presumption of innocence, the right of defence, the rights of victims of crime and the ne bis in idem principle is primarily essential in criminal proceedings in which fundamental freedoms are at stake,
ker je učinkovito uveljavljanje teh pravic v veliki meri odvisno od oblikovanja evropske skupne pravosodne kulture, ki bi temeljila na skupnih načelih in medsebojnem zaupanju med pravosodnimi sistemi,
whereas effective implementation of these rights largely depends on the creation of a European judicial common culture based on common principles and on mutual judicial trust,
ker je za ustvarjanje medsebojnega zaupanja in oblikovanje evropske skupne pravosodne kulture bistven učinkovit postopek za ocenjevanje pravosodnih sistemov,
whereas with a view to building mutual trust and creating a European judicial culture an effective procedure for the evaluation of justice is essential,
ker je vloga nacionalnih sodišč vse pomembnejša v boju proti mednarodnemu kriminalu in hkrati pri varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
whereas the role of national courts is becoming more and more relevant in fighting transnational crime and, at the same time, protecting fundamental rights and freedoms,
ker ima usposabljanje na področju pravosodja ključno vlogo pri ustvarjanju medsebojnega zaupanja in razvoju evropske skupne pravosodne kulture,
whereas judicial training plays a key role in building mutual trust and developing a common European judicial culture,
na Svet naslavlja priporočila:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
naj nameni ustrezno pozornost prednostim, ki jih nudijo nove tehnologije;
(e) that it pay due attention to advantages offered by new technologies;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji (ter [vladam …]).
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission (and the governments of …).
v skladu s členom 81 poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 81 of the Rules of Procedure
o osnutkih sklepov o pripravi letnih akcijskih programov za Brazilijo in Argentino za leto 2008 (CMTD–2008-0263 – D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 – D000421-01)
on the draft Commission decisions establishing Annual Action Programmes for Brazil for 2008 and for Argentina for 2008 (CMTD‑2008-0263 - D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 - D000421-01)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o osnutkih sklepov o pripravi letnih akcijskih programov za Brazilijo in Argentino za leto 2008 (C6‑2008-0263 – D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 – D000421-01)
European Parliament resolution on the draft Commission decision establishing Annual Action Programmes for Brazil for 2008 and for Argentina for 2008 (C6‑2008-0263 - D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 - D000421-01)
ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja UL L 378, 27.12.2006, str.
having regard to Regulation 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 18 December 2006, establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Komisije o pripravi letnih akcijskih programov za Brazilijo in Argentino za leto 2008 (CMTD6‑2008-0263 - D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 - D000421-01),
having regard to the draft Commission decision establishing Annual Action Programmes for Brazil and for Argentina for 2008 (CMTD6‑2008-0263 - D000422-01, CMTD-2008-0263 - D000421-01),
ob upoštevanju mnenja, ki ga je 10. junija 2008 predložil odbor iz člena 35(1) navedene uredbe (v nadaljevanju „odbor za upravljanje instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje“),
having regard to the opinion delivered on 10 June 2008 by the committee referred to in Article 35(1) of the above regulation (hereinafter referred to as 'the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) Management Committee'),
ob upoštevanju sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo z dne 3. junija 2008 o določitvi postopkov za izvajanje Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil, kakor je bil spremenjen s Sklepom 2006/512/ES,
having regard to the Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission of 3 June 2008 on procedures for implementing Council Decision 1999/468/EC laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission, as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC,