natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker peto azijsko-evropsko srečanje - vrh ASEM V - v Hanoju od 7. do 9. oktobra 2004 in sedmo srečanje zunanjih ministrov držav ASEM od 6. do 7. maja 2005 v Kyotu vzbujata upanje, da se bo proces ASAM še nadalje krepil na vseh ravneh, vključno z azijsko-evropskim partnerstvom za utrjevanje miru in stabilnosti na Daljnem vzhodu,
whereas the fifth Asia-Europe meeting – the ASEM 5 Summit – in Hanoi on 7‑9 October 2004 and the seventh meeting of Foreign Ministers of the ASEM countries on 6‑7 May 2005 in Kyoto raise hopes that the ASEM process will be further strengthened on all levels, including the Asia-Europe Parliamentary Partnership, with a view to fostering peace and stability in the Far East,
ugotavlja, da so naraščajoči gospodarski in trgovinski odnosi med Evropo in Daljnim vzhodom, mir in varnost regije za EU vedno bolj pomembni,
noting that, with the burgeoning economic and trade relationship between Europe and the Far East, peace and security in the region are increasingly vital for the EU,
obžaluje napetosti med posameznimi državami Daljnega vzhoda in izraža svojo pripravljenost za podporo vsem prizadevanjem za pospeševanje miru in stabilnosti na Daljnem vzhodu;
Deplores the tensions among various countries in the Far East and expresses its willingness to support all endeavours to support peace and stability in the Far East;
poudarja osnovna načela večstrankarske demokracije, pravne države in spoštovanje splošnih človekovih pravic kot predpogojev trajnega miru in stabilnosti na Daljnem vzhodu;
Underlines the basic principles of multi-party democracy, the rule of law and compliance with universal human rights as preconditions for lasting peace and stability in the Far East;
poziva Kitajsko in Tajvan k vzpostavitvi medsebojnega zaupanja in spoštovanja ter iskanju skupne podlage pri odpravljanju razlik, k vzpostavitvi potrebne politične podlage za miren in nemoten razvoj odnosov v Tajvanski ožini in k ponovnemu dialogu o teh odnosih, h krepitvi gospodarske izmenjave in sodelovanja, še posebej k spodbujanju 'treh neposrednih povezav' preko Tajvanske ožine (pošta, transport in trgovina);
Calls on China and Taiwan to establish mutual trust and respect and to seek common ground while setting aside differences, to put in place the necessary political basis for a peaceful and steady development of cross-Straits relations and to resume dialogue on those relations, to strengthen economic exchange and cooperation, particularly pushing forward the 'three direct links' across the Taiwan Strait (mail, transport and trade);
poudarja, da se kateri koli sporazum med Kitajsko in Tajvanom lahko doseže le na podlagi, ki je sprejemljiva za obe strani; izraža stališče, da je prihodnost odnosov v Tajvanski ožini odvisna od prilagodljivosti, ki sta jo obe strani pripravljeni pokazati; podpira tajvanske dosežke pri vzpostavitvi popolnega demokratičnega sistema, socialnega pluralizma, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in pravne države ter meni, da je treba spoštovati voljo in mnenje 23 milijonov ljudi na Tajvanu ter upoštevati v luči, upajmo, mirne rešitve med obema stranema;
Points out that any arrangement between China and Taiwan can only be achieved on a mutually acceptable basis; expresses the view that the future of cross-Straits relations will depend on both sides' willingness to demonstrate flexibility; supports Taiwan's achievements as regards the establishment of a fully-fledged democratic system, social pluralism, and respect for human rights and the rule of law, and takes the view that the will and approval of the 23 million people in Taiwan must be respected and taken into account with a view to a hopefully peaceful solution between the parties;
nasprotuje zakonu proti odcepitvi, ker ni v skladu z mednarodnim pravom in je orodje, ki ne more uspešno voditi k 'mirni nacionalni združitvi', ki je bila razglašen cilj in zato to slabi krhko varnostno ravnotežje na Daljnem vzhodu;
Objects to the anti-secession law because it does not comply with international law and is a tool that cannot successfully lead to 'peaceful national reunification', which was its declared goal, and it therefore undermines the fragile security balance in the Far East;
Močno priporoča Svetu in Komisiji, da se ohrani embargo na orožje, dokler na Kitajskem in pri odnosih v Tajvanski ožini ne bo storjen večji napredek na področju človekovih pravic ter dokler kodeks EU o ravnanja pri prodaji orožja ne bo pravno zavezujoč;
Strongly recommends to the Council and the Commission that the arms embargo remain intact until greater progress is made on human rights issues in China and on cross-Straits relations, as well as until the EU makes its code of conduct on arms sales legally binding;
poziva Kitajsko, da postopno uresničuje splošne človekove pravice ter še zlasti nemudoma ratificira Mednarodni pakt o državljanskih in političnih pravicah;
Calls on China gradually to implement universal human rights and especially to ratify promptly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights;
pozdravlja ponovitev prve seje četrtega kroga razprav v okviru sino-tibetanskega dialoga, ki je potekal v Bernu (Švica) od 30. junija do 1. julija, ter poziva k nadaljevanju tega.
Welcomes the resumption of the first session of the fourth round of talks in the framework of the Sino-Tibetan dialogue which took place in Bern (Switzerland) from 30 June to 1 July, and calls for it to continue;
poziva k večji zastopanosti Tajvana v mednarodnih organizacijah in ponovno poziva Komisijo in države članice k podpori tajvanske vloge za status opazovalca v Svetovni zdravstveni organizaciji;
Calls for a better representation of Taiwan in international organisations and reiterates its call on the Commission and the Member States to support Taiwan's application for observer status in the World Health Organisation;
je zelo zaskrbljen zaradi izjave Severne Koreje z dne 10. februarja 2005 o tem, da poseduje jedrsko orožje ter da za nedoločeno obdobje ne namerava sodelovati v šeststranskih pogovorih o njenem jedrskem programu;
Is deeply concerned that North Korea declared on 10 February 2005 that it possesses nuclear weapons and suspended its participation in the six-party talks on its nuclear programme for an indefinite period of time;
poziva Severno Korejo, da ponovno pristopi k Pogodbi o neširjenju jedrskega orožja ter da prekliče svojo odločitev o nesodelovanju v šeststranskih pogovorih in omogoči nadaljevanje pogajanj za mirno rešitev krize na korejskem polotoku;
Urges North Korea to rejoin the NPT, to revoke its decision to withdraw from the six-party talks and to allow the resumption of negotiations in order to find a peaceful solution to the crisis in the Korean peninsula;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da ponudita finančno podporo za dobavo mazuta Severni Koreji, s čimer bo ta lahko pokrila svoje primarne energetske potrebe, vendar ob potrditvi zaustavitve jedrske elektrarne v Yongbyonu; pozdravlja sodelovanje EU v Organizaciji Korejskega polotoka za energetski razvoj (KEDO); obžaluje oviranje ponovnega imenovanja Charlesa Kartmana za vodjo KEDO; poziva Komisijo in Svet, da storita potrebne korake za polno sodelovanje EU v prihodnjih šeststranskih pogovorih;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to offer financial support for heavy fuel oil supplies to remedy North Korea's primary energy needs, subject to a verified freezing of the Yongbyon plant; welcomes the EU participation in the Korean Energy Development Organisation (KEDO); regrets the blocking of Charles Kartman's reappointment as head of KEDO; asks the Commission and the Council to make the necessary approaches regarding full EU participation in future six-party talks;
poziva vlado Japonske, Kitajske in korejskega polotoka, da ustavijo vsako sovražno dejanje med seboj za omogočanje dialoga med narodi na uradni in neuradni ravni za skupno razumevanje zgodovine in za dosego končne sprave med svojimi vladami in narodi kot pomembne podlage miru in stabilnosti na Daljnem vzhodu;
Calls on the governments of Japan, China and the Korean peninsula to stop any adversary action against each other, to facilitate dialogue among the nations at official and unofficial level with a view to reaching a common understanding of history, and to come to a final reconciliation between their governments and peoples as an important basis for peace and stability in the Far East;
ugotavlja japonsko razumljivo željo po spremembi svoje ustave, ki je bila pripravljena po drugi svetovni vojni in ugotavlja simboličen pomen ohranjanja zavezanosti, da se vzdrži vodenja vojaških akcij;
Notes Japan's understandable wish to revise its constitution drafted in the aftermath of World War II and notes the symbolic importance of retaining a commitment to refraining from aggressive military action;
poziva vse države Daljnega vzhoda, da skušajo z dvostranskimi sporazumi rešiti nerešene ozemeljske spore v regiji, še zlasti:
Urges all countries in the Far East to seek bilateral agreements to resolve the outstanding territorial disputes in the region, in particular:
(a) vrnitev Japonski 'severnih ozemelj', ki jih je zavzela Sovjetska zveza ob koncu druge svetovne vojne in jih sedaj zaseda Rusija;
(a) the return to Japan of the 'Northern territories' that were occupied by the then Soviet Union at the end of World War II and are currently occupied by Russia;
(b) spor glede lastništva otokov Dokdo/Takeshima med Južno Korejo in Japonsko;
(b) the dispute over the ownership of the Dokdo/Takeshima Islands between South Korea and Japan;
(c) spor glede lastništva Senkaku–Daioyutai med Japonsko in Tajvanom;
(c) the dispute over the ownership of Senkaku–Daioyutai between Japan and Taiwan;
poziva vse države Daljnega vzhoda k medsebojni spravi šestdeset let po koncu druge svetovne vojne najdejo ter da vzpostavijo sistem medsebojnega razumevanja in sodelovanja za zagotavljanje trajnega miru in stabilnosti na Daljnem vzhodu, ter izraža pripravljenost za podporo tem prizadevanjem;
Calls on all countries in the Far East to seek reconciliation among themselves sixty years after the end of World War II and to establish a system of mutual understanding and cooperation in order to secure lasting peace and stability in the Far East, and declares its willingness to support these endeavours;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, generalnemu sekretarju Združenih narodov ter vladam in parlamentom držav, omenjenih v tej resoluciji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the governments and parliaments of the countries mentioned in this resolution.
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Doris Pack, Elmar Brok in Anna Ibrisagic, v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Doris Pack, Elmar Brok and Anna Ibrisagic, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Hannes Swoboda, Panagiotis Beglitis, Borut Pahor in Jan Marinus Wiersma, v imenu skupine PSE
– Hannes Swoboda, Panagiotis Beglitis, Borut Pahor and Jan Marinus Wiersma, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Jelko Kacin, v imenu skupine ALDE
– Jelko Kacin, on behalf of the ALDE Group
– Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, Monica Frassoni, Angelika Beer, Joost Lagendijk, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Gisela Kallenbach in Sepp Kusstatscher, v imenu skupine Verts/ALE
– Daniel Marc Cohn-Bendit, Monica Frassoni, Angelika Beer, Joost Lagendijk, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Gisela Kallenbach and Sepp Kusstatscher, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
– Francis Wurtz, André Brie, Erik Meijer in Jonas Sjöstedt, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
– Francis Wurtz, André Brie, Erik Meijer and Jonas Sjöstedt, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
– Brian Crowley, Adriana Poli Bortone in Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, v imenu skupine UEN
– Brian Crowley, Adriana Poli Bortone, Ģirts Valdis Kristovskis, on behalf of the UEN Group
ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o Bosni in Hercegovini in zahodnem Balkanu, zlasti tiste o regionalni integraciji na zahodnem Balkanu, ki je bila sprejeta 14. aprila 2005,
having regard to its previous resolutions on Bosnia-Herzegovina and the western Balkans, in particular that on the state of regional integration in the western Balkans adopted on 14 April 2005,
ob upoštevanju Stabilizacijsko-pridružitvenega procesa za države zahodnega Balkana, ki je nastal na pobudo EU leta 1999 v prizadevanju za pospešitev demokratizacije, pravičnosti, sprave in miru v regiji,
having regard to the Stabilisation and Association Process (SAP) for the countries of the western Balkans initiated by the EU in 1999 in an effort to promote democratisation, justice, reconciliation and peace in the region,
ob upoštevanju sklepov vrha EU v Solunu z dne 21. junija 2003, ki izpostavlja evropsko perspektivo držav zahodnega Balkana, ki bodo postale sestavni del EU, ko bodo izpolnjevale postavljena merila,
having regard to the conclusions of the EU Thessaloniki summit of 21 June 2003 highlighting the European perspective of the western Balkan countries, which will become an integral part of the EU once they meet the established criteria,
ob upoštevanju sklepov zadnjega zasedanja Evropskega sveta v Bruslju 16. in 17. junija 2005, ki je znova potrdil svojo zavezanost celovitemu izvajanju solunskega načrta,
having regard to the conclusions of the last European Council meeting held in Brussels on 16-17 June 2005 reaffirming its commitment to full implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda,
ob upoštevanju resolucij Varnostnega sveta ZN št. 827 z dne 25. maja 1993, št. 1244 z dne 10. junija 1999, št. 1551 z dne 9. julija 2004 in št. 1575 z dne 22. novembra 2004,
having regard to UN Security Council Resolutions 827 of 25 May 1993, 1244 of 10 June 1999, 1551 of 9 July 2004 and 1575 of 22 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju poročila glavne tožilke Mednarodnega sodišča za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije (ICTY) Carle del Ponte Varnostnemu svetu ZN z dne 13. junija 2005
having regard to the report by the Chief Prosecutor of the ICTY, Carla del Ponte, to the UN Security Council on 13 June 2005,
ob upoštevanju člena 103(4) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker je Srebrenica, mesto, ki leži v vzhodni Bosni in je bilo z resolucijo Varnostnega sveta ZN z dne 16. aprila 1993 razglašeno za varno območje, 11. julija 1995 padla v roke silam bosanskih Srbov pod vodstvom generala Ratka Mladića in tedanjega predsednika Republike Srpske Radovana Karadžića;
whereas on 11 July 1995 the eastern Bosnian town of Srebrenica, which was proclaimed a safe area by the UN Security Council resolution of 16 April 1993, fell to the Bosnian Serb forces led by General Ratko Mladic and under the direction of the then president of the Republika Srpska, Radovan Karadzic,
ker so med več dni trajajočim pokolom po padcu Srebrenice sile bosanskih Srbov pod poveljstvom generala Mladića in paravojaške enote, vključno s srbskimi neuradnimi policijskimi enotami, ki so na območje Bosne vstopile iz Srbije, po hitrem postopku usmrtile 8000 muslimanskih moških in dečkov, ki so se zatekli na to območje, ki je bilo pod varstvom varnostnih sil Združenih narodov (UNPROFOR);
whereas during several days of carnage after the fall of Srebrenica more than 8000 Muslim men and boys, who had sought safety in this area under the protection of the United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR), were summarily executed by Bosnian Serb forces commanded by General Mladic and by paramilitary units, including Serbian irregular police units which had entered Bosnian territory from Serbia,
ker se je ta tragedija, ki jo je Mednarodno sodišče za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije razglasilo za genocid, zgodila na območju, ki so ga ZN razglasili za varno zatočišče, in tako predstavlja simbol nemoči mednarodne skupnosti, da bi posredovala v konfliktu in zaščitila nedolžne;
whereas this tragedy, declared an act of genocide by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY), took place in a UN-proclaimed safe haven, and therefore stands as a symbol of the impotence of the international community to intervene in the conflict and protect the innocent,
glede na množične kršitve Ženevske konvencije, ki so jih zagrešile čete bosanskih Srbov proti muslimanskim civilnim prebivalcem Srebrenice, vključno z deportacijami tisočev žensk, otrok in starejših ljudi ter posilstvi velikega števila žensk;
having regard to the multiple violations of the Geneva Convention perpetrated by Bosnian Serb troops against Srebrenica's Muslim civilians, including deportations of thousands of women, children and elderly and the rape of a large number of women,
ker kljub dosedanjim izjemnim naporom, da bi odkrili in odkopali množična grobišča in posamezne grobove ter identificirali trupla žrtev, dosedanje raziskave ne omogočajo popolne rekonstrukcije dogodkov v Srebrenici in njeni okolici;
whereas in spite of the enormous efforts made to date to discover and exhume mass and individual graves and identify the bodies of the victims, the researches conducted until now do not offer a complete reconstruction of the events in and around Srebrenica,
ker ne more biti resničnega miru brez pravice in ker celovito in neomejeno sodelovanje z Mednarodnim sodiščem za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije ostaja temeljni pogoj za nadaljevanje procesa integracije držav zahodnega Balkana v EU;
whereas there cannot be a real peace without justice, and full and unrestricted cooperation with the ICTY remains a basic requirement for further continuation of the process of integration into the EU for the countries of the Western Balkans,
ker je bil general vojske bosanskih Srbov Radislav Krstić sicer prva oseba, ki jo je Mednarodno sodišče za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije spoznalo za krivo dejanj pomoči in napeljevanja h genocidu v Srebrenici, a sta osebi, ki ju najbolj očitno bremenijo obtožbe, Ratko Mladić in Radovan Karadžić, deset let po tragičnih dogodkih še vedno na prostosti;
whereas General Radislav Krstic of the Bosnian Serb army is the first person found guilty by the ICTY of aiding and abetting the Srebrenica genocide, but the two most prominently indicted persons, Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic, are still at large ten years after the tragic events,
ker so pomanjkljivosti mehanizmov procesa odločanja EU in pomanjkanje prave skupne zunanje in varnostne politike prav tako igrale negativno vlogo pri določanju poteka teh dogodkov;
whereas the shortfalls in the EU decision-making mechanisms and the lack of a genuine common foreign and security policy also played a negative role in the determination of the events,
ker so se proračunska sredstva za odnose z zahodnim Balkanom po letu 2002 neprestano in občutno zmanjševala; ker je treba temu območju nameniti ustrezna sredstva, da bi se upošteval postopni prehod od fizične obnove do institucionalne izgradnje in predpristopne pomoči pa tudi strateškega pomena za EU;
whereas the EU budgetary allocations for relations with the western Balkans have been constantly and significantly reduced every year since 2002; whereas the region must be allocated adequate funding to take into account the gradual shift from physical reconstruction to institution-building and pre-accession assistance, as well as its strategic importance to the EU,
ker je Bosna in Hercegovina svojo pogajalsko mizo preselila iz Daytona v Bruselj in ker projekt EU v državi uživa veliko podporo javnosti;
whereas Bosnia-Herzegovina has moved its negotiating table from Dayton to Brussels, and the project of an EU future enjoys great popular support in the country,
obsoja, v največji možni meri, pokol v Srebrenici; se spominja žrtev okrutnih dejanj in jim izkazuje spoštovanje; izreka sožalje in izraža solidarnost z družinami žrtev, med katerimi jih mnogo živi brez dokončne potrditve glede usodi svojih očetov, sinov, mož ali bratov; priznava, da to trajajočo bolečino poglabljajo neuspeli poskusi, da bi odgovorne za ta dejanja privedli pred sodišče;
Condemns in the strongest possible terms the Srebrenica massacre; commemorates and honours the victims of the atrocities; expresses its condolences to and solidarity with the families of the victims, many of whom are living without final confirmation of the fate of their fathers, sons, husbands or brothers; recognising that this continuing pain is aggravated by the failure to bring those responsible for these acts to justice;
poziva Svet in Komisijo k primerni obeležitvi spomina na deseto obletnico genocida v Srebrenici in kraju Potočari, ob poudarjanju, da mora ta neznosna sramota v Evropi za vedno obveljati kot zadnji pokol, ki je bil izveden v imenu etnične ideologije; izjavlja, da bo storil vse, kar je v njegovi moči, da v Evropi nikoli več ne bi prišlo do takšnih okrutnih barbarstev;
Calls on the Council and Commission to pay adequate remembrance to the tenth anniversary of the Srebrenica-Potocari act of genocide, stressing that this unbearable shame in Europe should be considered forever the last massacre carried out in the name of ethnic ideology; states that it will do everything in its power to prevent such acts of monstrous barbarism from happening in Europe ever again;
izraža svojo globoko zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da sta Radovan Karadžić in Ratko Mladić še vedno na prostosti in poziva Republiko Srpsko ter Srbijo in Črno Goro, da sprejmeta nujne ukrepe za odkritje Karadžića in Mladića ter ju privedeta pred sodišče; meni, da očitna podpora javnosti, ki jo v nekaterih delih te regije uživata Karadžić in Mladić, predstavlja žalitev spomina na žrtve in veliko oviro na poti k spravi;
Expresses its deepest concern that Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic are still at large in the region, and calls on the Republika Srpska and on Serbia-Montenegro to take urgent action in order to locate Karadzic and Mladic and bring them to justice; considers the apparent popular support enjoyed by Karadzic and Mladic in some parts of the region to be an insult to the memory of the victims and a major obstacle to reconciliation;
izraža iskreno podporo dragocenemu in težavnemu delu Mednarodnega sodišča za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije in ponavlja, da je sodelovanje s tem sodiščem predpogoj za tesnejše sodelovanje z EU; vse države v tej regiji morajo izpolnjevati svoje obveznosti glede polnega in nenehnega sodelovanja z Mednarodnim sodiščem za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije; prijetje, privedba in obsodba krivcev za vojne zločine je najmanj kar dolgujemo tisočem žrtev vojnih zločinov v Srebrenici in drugod;
Expresses its wholehearted support for the valuable and difficult work of the ICTY, and reiterates that full cooperation with the Tribunal is a precondition for closer cooperation with the EU; all countries in the region should meet their obligations to cooperate fully with the ICTY at all times; the capture, transfer and condemnation of those guilty of war crimes is a minimum act of recognition for the thousands of war crimes victims in Srebrenica and elsewhere;
poudarja pomen miru in varnosti na zahodnem Balkanu in vlogo polne izvedbe solunskega načrta pri doseganju ciljev procesa stabilizacije in pridružitvenega procesa; poudarja, da ostaja celovito in neomejeno sodelovanje z Mednarodnim sodiščem za vojne zločine na območju nekdanje Jugoslavije temeljni pogoj za nadaljevanje procesa integracije v Evropsko unijo;
Stresses the importance of securing peace and stability in the western Balkans and the role that full implementation of the Thessaloniki agenda plays in achieving the objectives of the stabilisation and association process; emphasises that full and unrestricted cooperation with the ICTY remains an essential requirement for further continuation of the process of integration with the EU;
opozarja, da mandatu in mirovnim silam ZN ni uspelo zaščititi dodeljenih varnih območij; poziva ZN in ustrezne mednarodne ustanove, da v praksi uporabijo izkušnje, ki izhajajo iz tega neuspeha in da se dejansko pripravijo za prihodnje mirovne misije;
Recalls that the UN peacekeeping mandate and force failed to protect the assigned safe areas; calls on the UN and the relevant international institutions to put into practice the lessons learned from this failure and to be truly prepared for future peacekeeping missions;