natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vlagatelji, katerim se predloge zavrne na kateri koli stopnji, se
The applicants whose proposals are rejected at any stage shall
po zaključku zadevne stopnje
upon completion of that stage
obvestijo v skladu s členom 116(3) finančne uredbe.
be informed in accordance with Article 116 (3) of the Financial Regulation.
Sprememba 53 ČLEN 1, TOČKA 91 A (novo) Člen 183, odstavek 2 (Uredba (ES, Euratom) št. 2342/2002)
Amendment 53 ARTICLE 1, POINT 91 A (new) Article 183, paragraph 2 (Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002)
(91a) Člen 183(2) se nadomesti z naslednjim:
(91a) Article 183(2) is replaced by the following:
Plačila se lahko ustavijo tudi na podlagi domnevne kršitve drugih klavzul v sporazumu.
Payments may also be suspended following presumed infringements of other clauses in the agreement.
Namen take začasne ustavitve je, da se zagotovi čas za preverjanje, ali je bila domnevna kršitev dejansko storjena in za njeno odpravo, kjer je to primerno.
The purpose of such suspension shall be to give time to check, whether the presumed infringements have in fact occurred and, where appropriate, to rectify them.
V tem primeru odgovorni odredbodajalec nemudoma preveri, ali obstaja domnevna kršitev in čim prej sprejme odločitev o nadaljnjih postopkih.
In this case, the authorising officer responsible shall immediately verify the existence or non-existence of the alleged infringement, and shall make a decision on further proceedings as soon as possible.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupnem besedilu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o vzpostavitvi infrastrukture za prostorske informacije v Evropski skupnosti (INSPIRE), ki ga je potrdil Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6-0445/2006 – 2004/0175(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6-0445/2006 – 2004/0175(COD) )
ob upoštevanju skupnega besedila, ki ga je odobril Spravni odbor (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6-0445/2006 ),
having regard to the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee (PE-CONS 3685/2006 – C6-0445/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave UL C 124 E, 25.5.2006, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 124 E, 25.5.2006, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2004)0516 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2004)0516 ) Not yet published in OJ.
o skupnem stališču Sveta UL C 126 E, 30.5.2006, str.
on the Council common position OJ C 126 E, 30.5.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila svoje delegacije v Spravnem odboru ( A6-0021/2007 ),
having regard to the report of its delegation to the Conciliation Committee ( A6-0021/2007 ),
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Tematski strategiji o recikliranju odpadkov ( 2006/2175(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on a Thematic Strategy on the recycling of waste ( 2006/2175(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij z naslovom "Nadaljevanje trajnostne uporabe virov: Tematska strategija o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov" ( KOM(2005)0666 ),
having regard to the Commission communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on 'Taking sustainable use of resources forward: A thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste' ( COM(2005)0666 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 2 in 6 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je treba zahteve varstva okolja vključiti v različne sektorje politike Skupnosti, s ciljem pospeševanja okoljsko trajnostnega razvoja gospodarskih dejavnosti,
having regard to Articles 2 and 6 of the EC Treaty, by virtue of which environmental protection requirements must be integrated into the various sectors of Community policy with the aim of promoting an environmentally sustainable development of economic activities,
ob upoštevanju člena 175 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Article 175 of the EC Treaty,
, zlasti člena 8 Sklepa,
(6th EAP), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Tematska strategija o trajnostni rabi naravnih virov" ( KOM(2005)0670 ) (Strategija o virih),
having regard to the Commission's communication on 'A thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources" ( COM(2005)0670 ) (the Resources Strategy),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o sporočilu Komisije z naslovom "Na poti k tematski strategiji za preprečevanje nastajanja in recikliranje odpadkov" UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the communication from the Commission: 'Towards a thematic strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste' OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 19. novembra 2003 o poročilu o nadaljnjem spremljanju o Direktivi Sveta 75/442/EGS (Okvirna direktiva o odpadkih) UL C 87 E, 7.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 19 November 2003 on the follow-up report on Council Directive 75/442/EEC (Waste Framework Directive) OJ C 87 E, 7.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. novembra 1996 o sporočilu Komisije o reviziji strategije Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki ter osnutku resolucije Sveta o politiki ravnanja z odpadki UL C 362, 2.12.1996, str.
having regard to its resolution of 14 November 1996 on the communication from the Commission on the review of the Community strategy for waste management and the draft Council resolution on waste policy OJ C 362, 2.12.1996, p.
in resolucije Sveta z dne 24. februarja 1997 o strategiji Skupnosti za ravnanje z odpadki UL C 76, 11.3.1997, str.
and to the Council Resolution of 24 February 1997 on a Community strategy for waste management OJ C 76, 11.3.1997, p.
ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti, zlasti v zadevah C-203/96, C-365/97, C-209/98, C-418/99, C-419/99, C-9/00, C-228/00, C-458/00, C-416/02 in C-121/03,
having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, particularly in Cases C-203/96, C-365/97, C-209/98, C-418/99, C-419/99, C-9/00, C-228/00, C-458/00, C-416/02 and C-121/03,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A6-0438/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A6-0438/2006 ),
ker so v členu 8 šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti zelo jasno opredeljeni cilji in načela politike EU glede ravnanja z odpadki,
whereas Article 8 of the 6th EAP has set very clear objectives, targets and principles for EU waste policy,
ker sta v točki (iv) člena 8(2) šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa Skupnosti predvidena razvoj ali revizija direktiv o gradbenih odpadkih in odpadkih pri rušenju objektov, blatu iz čistilnih naprav in biorazgradljivih odpadkih,
B whereas Article 8(2), point (iv) of the 6th EAP provides for the development or revision of the directives on construction and demolition waste, sewage sludge and biodegradable wastes,
ker kljub nekaterim uspehom, ki so bili doseženi s politiko EU glede ravnanja z odpadki v preteklih 30 letih, ostajajo nerešeni naslednji problemi:
whereas, despite some successes achieved by the waste policy of the EU in the past 30 years, the following problems remain:
ker je gospodarstvo kot ekosistem: oba sistema koristita energijo in surovine ter jih spreminjata v proizvode in postopke, s to razliko, da gospodarstvo sledi linearnim tokovom virov, medtem ko je narava ciklična; in ker ekosistemi delujejo tako, da odpadke s prenosom energije sončne svetlobe spreminjajo v vire, medtem ko to z industrijskimi postopki ni mogoče; ker so zaradi hitro rastočega gospodarstva in prebivalstva proizvodnja in izdelki, zaradi katerih nastajajo tokovi odpadkov, ki jih narava ni sposobna absorbirati in spremeniti v nove vire, z vidika trajnosti vse bolj problematični,
whereas economies are like ecosystems: both systems take in energy and materials and turn them into products and processes, the difference being that our economy follows linear resource flows whereas nature is cyclic; and whereas ecosystems perform functions which convert waste into resources, by transferring energy from the sunlight, and whereas industrial processes are not able to do this; whereas, against the backdrop of rapidly growing economies and populations, production and products that lead to waste streams which nature cannot absorb and turn into new resources are increasingly problematic from the point of view of sustainability,
ker je nujno treba spremeniti sedanji ustroj proizvodnje in potrošnje; ker je glavni cilj usmerjati potrošnjo v trajnost, postopke pridobivanja surovin, proizvodnje in načrtovanja izdelkov pa čim bolj uskladiti z naravnimi procesi in vzorci,
whereas a transformation of the present system of production and consumption is urgently needed; whereas the main objective is to change consumption in a sustainable direction and bring the processes of raw material extraction, production and product design as much into line with natural processes and designs as possible,
ker lahko boljše razumevanje delovanja naravnih sistemov in strukturiranje gospodarstva po bioloških načelih koristita okolju in hkrati predstavljata osnovno izhodišče,
whereas an enhanced understanding of how natural systems work and of structuring business along biological lines can both improve the environment and establish the bottom line,
ker je pospeševanje bolj celostnih in sistematičnih praks, kot so na primer povezovanje proizvodnje, funkcionalno mišljenje (spreminjanje proizvodov v storitve), dematerializacija in tehnološki razvoj na osnovi posnemanja narave sredstvo za preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov,
whereas promotion of more integrated and systems-based practices, such as for instance the clustering of production, functional thinking (turning products into services), dematerialisation and technology development based on imitating nature is a means to prevent waste generation,
ker je odlaganje, zlasti na odlagališča, v večini držav članic še vedno najbolj pogost način ravnanja z odpadki,
whereas in most Member States disposal, in particular landfill, is still the most common form of waste treatment,
ker lahko preprečevanje, ponovna uporaba, recikliranje in energetska predelava odpadkov – ta vrstni red odraža njihovo ustreznost – ohranja naravne vire,
whereas prevention, re-use, recycling and energy recovery of waste - with the order reflecting the degree of relevance – can save natural resources,
ker cilji Skupnosti in nacionalni cilji na področju preprečevanja niso bili nikoli doseženi, čeprav je preprečevanje še vedno najpomembnejši cilj,
whereas Community and national prevention targets have never been achieved, although prevention is still the most important objective;
ker ne obstajajo ustrezni minimalni standardi Skupnosti, ki bi veljali za veliko število naprav za predelavo in recikliranje, kar povzroča različne ravni varstva okolja v državah članicah, "ekodamping" in izkrivljanje konkurence,
whereas there are no adequate Community minimum standards applying to many recovery and recycling facilities, which results in different levels of environmental protection in the Member States, eco-dumping and distortions of competition,
priznava sporočilo Komisije z naslovom "Nadaljevanje trajnostne uporabe virov: Tematska strategija o preprečevanju in recikliranju odpadkov" kot osnovo za razpravo o prihodnosti politike ravnanja z odpadki;
Recognises the Commission's Communication on 'Taking sustainable use of resources forward: A Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste' as a basis for the discussion on future waste policy;
poudarja, da je odločilni cilj ravnanja z odpadki doseganje visoke ravni varstva okolja in zdravja ljudi, ne pa pospeševanje delovanja notranjega trga za predelavo odpadkov;
Stresses the substantial aim for waste management of achieving a high level of protection of the environment and human health rather than facilitating the functioning of the internal market for waste recovery;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba poleg okoljskih vplivov v EU upoštevati tudi vplive zunaj EU;
Points out that account should be taken not only of the environmental impact in the EU but also of the impact outside the EU;
poudarja pomen splošnih načel ravnanja z odpadki, kot so previdnostno načelo in načelo, da plača povzročitelj obremenitve, načelo odgovornosti tistega, ki povzroča odpadke, ter pri tokovih posebnih odpadkov načelo odgovornosti posameznega proizvajalca kot tudi načeli bližine samozadostnosti;
Underlines the importance of the general principles of waste management, such as the precautionary principle and the polluter pays principle, the principle of the waste generator's responsibility and, for specific waste flows, the principle of individual producer responsibility, as well as the principles of proximity and self-sufficiency;
poudarja, da polno izvajanje veljavne zakonodaje Skupnosti o ravnanju z odpadki in enako uresničevanje v vseh državah članicah predstavlja ključno prednostno nalogo;
Emphasises that full implementation of existing Community waste legislation and equal enforcement across all Member States is a key priority;
ne more razumeti, zakaj kljub predlogu za revizijo Okvirne direktive o odpadkih manjka še veliko konkretnih izvedbenih ukrepov in instrumentov (predvidenih v šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti);
Fails to understand why, despite a proposal for the revision of the Waste Framework Directive, many concrete implementing measures and instruments (which were foreseen in the 6th EAP) are missing;
Poenostavitev in posodobitev veljavne zakonodaje
Simplification and modernisation of existing legislation
poudarja, da bi moralo do sprememb opredelitev priti zgolj zaradi večje jasnosti in ne zaradi omilitve pravil glede varstva okolja ali zaradi spodbujanja odobravanja nekega koncepta v javnosti (npr. z omilitvijo negativne konotacije besed "odpadki" ali "odlaganje");
Stresses that the changing of definitions should only be undertaken for reasons of clarification, and not to weaken environmental protection rules or encourage public acceptance of a concept (for instance by softening the negative connotation of "waste" or "disposal");
poudarja, da morajo biti politične odločitve, kot je opredelitev odpadkov, predelave in odlaganja, sprejete s postopkom soodločanja in ne s postopkom komitologije;
Stresses that political decisions, such as the definitions of waste, recovery and disposal, must not be taken in comitology, but by codecision;
poudarja, da bi morala biti uporaba postopka komitologije omejena zgolj na nepolitične odločitve, zlasti tiste, ki so tehnične in znanstvene narave;
Emphasises that use of the comitology procedure should be limited to non-political decisions, especially those of a technical and scientific nature;
poudarja, da bi moral biti status "okolja brez odpadkov" dosežen šele potem, ko bi zadevni tok odpadkov ponovno uporabili, reciklirali ali bi šel skozi postopek predelave –kar ne izključuje možnosti nastanka novih odpadkov – in bi izpolnjeval dogovorjene evropske standarde, tako da bi bil primeren za uporabo, ter po sprejetju in začetku uporabe pravil o sledljivosti;
Emphasises that the end-of-waste status should only be achieved after the waste stream in question has been re-used or recycled or has undergone a recovery operation - which does not exclude the possibility that a recovery operation may generate new waste - and meets agreed European standards, making it fit for a purpose, and after traceability rules have been adopted and are being applied;
zahteva, da bi morali vsi odpadki, namenjeni energetski predelavi ali sežiganju, ostati odpadki, pri čemer se uporablja Direktiva 2000/76/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 4. decembra 2000 o sežiganju odpadkov UL L 332, 28.12.2000, str.
Demands that all waste intended for energy recovery or incineration should remain waste, in respect of which Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste OJ L 332, 28.12.2000, p.
(direktiva o sežiganju odpadkov);
(the Waste Incineration Directive) should apply;
poudarja, da bi bila potrebna revizija seznamov odpadkov za predelavo in odlaganje iz prilog okvirne direktive o odpadkih in da bi bilo treba te sezname prilagoditi sedanji praksi ravnanja z odpadki v skladu s postopkom soodločanja;
Emphasises that the lists of recovery and disposal operations contained in the annexes to the Waste Framework Directive should be revised and adapted to current waste management practices in accordance with the codecision procedure;
je zelo zadržan do predlagane metode za izračun energetske učinkovitosti in dejstva, da se jo uporablja le za sežigalnice komunalnih odpadkov; poziva Komisijo k reviziji direktive o sežiganju odpadkov, da bi se vzpostavili enaki okoljski standardi (za emisije in energetsko učinkovitost) tako za sežiganje kot za sosežiganje;
Expresses strong reservations on the proposed energy efficiency calculation method, and the fact that it is to apply to municipal waste incinerators only; calls on the Commission to revise the Waste Incineration Directive, in order to set equal environmental standards (for emissions and energy efficiency) for both incineration and co-incineration of waste;
Uvedba koncepta življenjskega cikla v politiki ravnanja z odpadki
Introducing life-cycle thinking in waste policy
poudarja ključni pomen hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki, ki ukrepe razvršča po pomembnosti:
Emphasises the key importance of the waste hierarchy, which sets out priorities for action in descending order:
recikliranje materialov;
material recycling;
drugi postopki predelave, npr. energetska predelava;
other recovery operations, for example energy recovery;
meni, da je koncept življenjskega cikla uporaben za oceno vplivov odpadkov na okolje in zdravje ljudi; poudarja, da sama hierarhija temelji na tem konceptu, a priznava, da je analizo življenjskega cikla in druge analize v izjemnih primerih možno uporabiti kot odklon od hierarhije ravnanja z odpadki, vendar le če obstajajo jasni dokazi za to, da je druga možnost iz okoljskih ali zdravstvenih razlogov dejansko boljša, ali da se izogne pretirano visokim stroškom;
Regards life-cycle thinking as a useful concept to evaluate the environmental and human health impacts of waste; stresses that the hierarchy itself is based on this concept, but acknowledges that life-cycle and other analyses can be used in exceptional cases to deviate from the waste hierarchy, though only when there is clear evidence that another option is actually better on environmental or health grounds or to avoid unreasonably high costs;
Izboljšanje temeljnega znanja
Improving the knowledge base
podpira izboljšanje temeljnega znanja v zvezi s politiko EU glede ravnanja z odpadki, a poudarja, da je bolj pomembno izvajanje konkretnih ukrepov;
Supports the improvement of the knowledge base with regard to EU waste policy, but stresses that the implementation of concrete actions is more important;
Preprečevanje nastajanja odpadkov
Waste prevention
obžaluje pomanjkanje ciljev na področju kvantitativnega in kvalitativnega zmanjševanja odpadkov, ki bi zajemali vse zadevne odpadke in ki so bili v šestem okoljskem akcijskem programu Skupnosti označeni za enega izmed prednostnih ukrepov; poziva Komisijo, naj v končni oceni šestega okoljskega akcijskega programa predstavi predlog ciljev;
Regrets the lack of quantitative and qualitative reduction targets covering all relevant waste, which were indicated as one of the priority actions in the 6th EAP; calls on the Commission to come forward with a proposal for targets in its final assessment of the 6th EAP;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi konkretne ukrepe za preprečevanje odpadkov na področju politike proizvodov, kemikalij in ekološkega oblikovanja, da bi se s tem zmanjšalo nastajanje odpadkov in prisotnost nevarnih snovi v odpadkih, kar bi pospešilo varno in okolju prijazno ravnanje z odpadki; poudarja pomen pospeševanja proizvodov in tehnologij, ki manj škodujejo okolju, kot tudi proizvodov, ki so primernejši za ponovno uporabo in recikliranje;
Calls on the Commission to come forward with concrete waste prevention measures in the fields of product policy, chemicals policy and eco-design, to minimise both the generation of waste and the presence of hazardous substances in waste, and thereby foster the safe and environmentally sound treatment of waste; emphasises the importance of promoting products and technologies which are less harmful to the environment as well as products which are more suitable for re-use and recycling;
opozarja na medsebojno vplivanje strategij za ravnanje z odpadki in drugih strategij, zlasti trajnostne uporabe naravnih virov, trajnostnega razvoja in integrirane politike do proizvodov;
Draws attention to the interaction between waste strategies and other strategies, particularly the sustainable use of natural resources, sustainable development and integrated product policy;
poziva Komisijo, naj do leta 2008 razvije nabor kazalcev, kot je bilo napovedano v strategiji o virih;
Calls on the Commission to develop a set of indicators by 2008, as announced in the Resources Strategy;
poudarja, da ustrezno izvajanje koncepta odgovornosti proizvajalca predstavlja močan instrument za preprečevanje odpadkov;
Emphasises that proper implementation of the concept of producer responsibility is a strong instrument to prevent waste;
opozarja na vlogo kampanj obveščanja o politiki odpadkov, zlasti o preprečevanju, ter osveščanja javnosti o prednostih trajnostnega ravnanja z odpadki;
Draws attention to the role of information campaigns on waste policy, particularly on prevention and raising public awareness of the benefits of sustainable waste management;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi vidike preprečevanja odpadkov iz referenčnih dokumentov o najboljših razpoložljivih tehnologijah, razvitih v skladu z Direktivo Sveta 96/61/ES z dne 24. septembra 1996 o celovitem preprečevanju in nadzorovanju onesnaževanja UL L 257, 10.10.1996, str.
Calls on the Commission to reinforce the waste prevention aspects of the Best Available Technique Reference Documents (BREFs) developed under Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control OJ L 257, 10.10.1996, p.
(Direktiva IPPC), in v te dokumente vključi ustrezna navodila;
(the IPPC Directive) and to include relevant guidance in these documents;
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi konkretne ukrepe za spodbujanje ponovne uporabe in popravil z:
Calls on the Commission to come forward with concrete measures to promote re-use and repair activities:
vzpostavitvijo akreditacije centrov za ponovno uporabo odpadkov;
setting up an accreditation for re-use centres;
uvedbo znižane stopnje DDV za izdelke, prodane v centrih za ponovno uporabo;
introducing a reduced VAT rate on products sold by accredited re-use centres;
pripravo načrta za izdelavo standardov ponovne uporabe na ravni EU;
development of a road-map to elaborate re-use standards at EU level;
zagotavljanjem nadzora nad dejavnostmi ponovne uporabe in poročanja o njih;
ensuring monitoring and reporting on re-use activities;
K evropski družbi recikliranja
Towards a European recycling society
poudarja pomen doseganja skupnih minimalnih standardov za predelavo in recikliranje na ravni EU in poudarja, da bodo enaki pogoji delovanja vzpostavljeni le, ko bo prišlo do približanja uporabe ekonomskih instrumentov v celotni EU;
Underlines the importance of achieving common minimum standards for recovery and recycling at EU level, and stresses that a level playing field will only be established when the use of economic instruments is approximated throughout the EU;
poudarja pomen, ki ga ima ločevanje odpadkov po izvoru kot tudi cilji glede recikliranja in odgovornost proizvajalca za povečanje stopnje recikliranja določenih tokov odpadkov;
Emphasises the importance of source separation of waste, as well as recycling targets and producer responsibility in order to increase the recycling rate of certain waste streams;