natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker družba Union Carbide pri konstrukciji ali dejavnostih v Bhopalu očitno ni uporabljala enakih standardov varnosti kot jih je uporabljala v ZDA, predvsem kakršnegakoli obširnega načrta ali sistema za ukrepanje v primeru nesreče, ki bi opozoril lokalne skupnosti v Bhopalu o uhajanju plina in to kljub že leta 1982 izraženim skrbem glede varnosti tovarne v Bhopalu,
whereas Union Carbide clearly did not apply the same standards of safety in design or operations to Bhopal as it had in place in the USA, notably any comprehensive emergency plan or system in Bhopal to warn local communities about leaks, despite warnings as early as 1982 of major safety concerns regarding the Bhopal plant,
ker kemikalije, ki jih je družba Union Carbide pustila na območju, še danes zastrupljajo zajetja pitne vode ter povzročajo raka in okvare ob rojstvu,
whereas, even today, the chemicals that Union Carbide left behind continue to poison the water supply, causing cancer and birth defects,
ker je v letu 1999 testiranje kakovosti podtalnice in vode v vodnjakih v bližini mesta nesreče pokazalo, da je raven živega srebra v vodi od 20 000-krat do 6 000 000-krat večja od pričakovane; ker je bilo v vodi prav tako možno zaslediti kemikalije, ki povzročajo raka, poškodbe možganov in okvare ob rojstvu; in ker je bila raven trikloroetena (kemikalija za katero je dokazano, da škodljivo vpliva na razvoj zarodka) 50-krat višja kot jo predvidevajo varnostni standardi ameriške Agencije za zaščito okolja,
whereas, in 1999, local groundwater and well-water testing near the site of the accident revealed mercury at levels between 20 000 and 6 million times those expected; whereas chemicals causing cancer, brain-damage and birth-defects were also found in the water; and whereas trichloroethene (a chemical that has been shown to impair foetal development) was found at levels 50 times higher than U.S. Environmental Protection Agency safety limits,
ker je v letu 2001 družba Dow Chemicals kupila družbo Union Carbide za več kot 10 milijard dolarjev in novi lastniki od takrat dalje a) niso pripravljeni očistiti območja Bophala, ki še naprej onesnažuje okolico in b) zavračajo zahteve, da bi financirali zdravniško oskrbo za prizadete,
whereas, since the purchase of Union Carbide by Dow Chemicals in 2001, for more than $ 10 billion, the new owners have refused to clean up the Bophal site, which continues to contaminate, and to fund medical care for those affected,
ker dvajset let kasneje preživeli še vedno čakajo pravično odškodnino, ustrezno zdravniško oskrbo in celovito ekonomsko in družbeno rehabilitacijo,
whereas, 20 years later, the survivors still await just compensation, adequate medical assistance and treatment, and comprehensive economic and social rehabilitation,
ker sta leta 1989 družba Union Carbide in njena indijska hčerinska družba dosegli dogovor o sodni poravnavi z indijsko vlado, da za kritje vseh zahtevkov izplača 470 milijonov dolarjev odškodnine, kar je potrdilo indijsko vrhovno sodišče, na podlagi česar je bila odškodnina v celoti izplačana indijski vladi takoj po odločitvi sodišča,
whereas, in 1989, Union Carbide and its Indian subsidiary entered into a legal settlement with the Government of India in the sum of $ 470 million to cover all claims, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of India and pursuant to which that sum was paid out in full to the Government of India immediately after the Supreme Court decision,
ker se je znesek 470 milijonov dolarjev po plačilu odvetniških stroškov in domnevnih podkupnin podkupljivim indijskim uradnikom zmanjšal na posmehljivih 300 dolarjev za vsako žrtev nesreče, znesek, ki ne pokriva niti stroškov zdravstvene oskrbe,
whereas the amount of $ 470 million, after payment of lawyers' fees and alleged bribes to corrupt Indian officials, was reduced to a derisory sum of $ 300 for each victim of the catastrophe, an amount which did not even cover medical expenses,
ker je julija 2004 indijsko vrhovno sodišče odredilo indijski vladi, da sprosti vse dodatne odškodninske sklade, namenjene žrtvam nesreče,
whereas in July 2004 the Supreme Court of India ordered the Government of India to release all additional settlement funds to the victims,
ker je bil v preteklosti denar, namenjen za 105 000 žrtev, razdeljen med več kot 5-kratno število mrtvih, poškodovanih ali invalidnih oseb kot jih je za izračun poravnave uporabilo vrhovno sodišče, rezultat česar je velika krivica do žrtev; in ker so se že tako majhni zneski začeli izplačevati šele leta 1992,
whereas over the years the money meant for 105 000 victims has been distributed amongst more than five times the number of dead, injured and disabled used by the Supreme Court to calculate the settlement, which has resulted in grave injustice to victims, and whereas payments of whatever little money was finally distributed only started in 1992,
ker je indijska vlada storila bore malo za zaščito ljudi, ki so bili dodatno izpostavljeni in poškodovani, in še vedno ni ocenila škode ali naredila sanacijskega načrta,
whereas the Indian Government has done little to protect people from additional exposure and injury and there has still been no assessment of the damage or plan for remediation,
ker je indijska vlada v skladu s poravnavo prevzela odgovornost za zagotavljanje zdravniške oskrbe državljanov Bhopala v primeru bodočih bolezni,
whereas, pursuant to the settlement, the Government of India assumed responsibility for providing medical coverage to citizens of Bhopal in the event of future illnesses,
ker je slaba kakovost sistema zdravstvenega varstva imela za posledico, da je večina preživelih morala večji del denarnega nadomestila porabiti za zasebno zdravniško oskrbo,
whereas the poor quality of the health care system has meant that most survivors have had to spend most of their compensation money on private medical treatment,
ker kljub odredbi vrhovnega sodišča maja 2004, da mora vlada zagotoviti čisto pitno vodo skupnostim z onesnaženimi vodnimi viri, vlada zvezne države Madhya Pradesh še vedno ni v celoti izvedla odredbe sodišča,
whereas despite a Supreme Court order in May 2004 to provide clean drinking water to communities affected by the contaminated water the Government of Madhya Pradesh has not yet implemented the order in full,
ker ugotavlja, da tako UCC/Dow kot vladi Indije in zvezne države Madhya Pradesh niso izpolnili svojih obveznosti in odgovornosti glede preprečevanja uhajanja plina in celotnega obravnavanja posledic le-tega, kakor tudi glede preprečevanja in zaustavitve nenehnega onesnaževanja okolja in vode zaradi razpršenosti strupenih in nevarnih snovi,
acknowledging that both UCC/Dow and the Indian and Madhya Pradesh Governments failed to comply with their respective obligations and responsibilities to prevent the gas leak and fully address its consequences, as well as to prevent and stop the continuing pollution of the environment and water through the dispersal of toxic and hazardous substances,
izraža svoje resnično sočutje sorodnikom umrlih in tistim, ki še vedno trpijo zaradi kasnejših učinkov izpostavljenosti plinu ter poziva k boljšim odškodninam in ravnanju z žrtvami;
Expresses its sincerest sympathy to the relatives of the deceased and those still suffering from the after-effects of exposure to the gas, and calls for better compensation and treatment for the victims;
zagotovita učinkovito in takojšnjo dekontaminacijo ter temeljito očiščenje predela Bhopal,
ensure the effective and prompt decontamination and clean-up of the Bhopal site,
zagotovita redno dobavo ustrezne zdrave vode za domačo porabo v prizadetih skupnostih v skladu z odredbo vrhovnega sodišča ter zagotovita primerno in dostopno zdravstveno oskrbo za vse preživele,
ensure regular supplies of adequate safe water for domestic use by the affected communities, in line with the order issued by the Supreme Court, and ensure adequate and accessible health care for all survivors,
ponovno ocenita odškodnine, ki so jih prejele žrtve, ob upoštevanju poravnave iz leta 1989, in odpravita vsako pomanjkljivost v skladu z odredbo vrhovnega sodišča iz leta 1991;
reassess the compensation received by victims, following the 1989 settlement, and make up any shortfall, in line with the Supreme Court's 1991 order;
globoko obžaluje, da poravnava iz leta 1989 med Union Carbide in indijsko vlado ni imel nobenega pozitivnega učinka za tiste, ki so bili izpostavljeni plinu, niti ni v nikakršni meri upoštevan učinek na okolje;
Deeply regrets that the 1989 settlement between Union Carbide and the Indian Government has never had any positive impact on those exposed to the gas, or indeed paid any attention to the environmental impact thereof;
poudarja, da so bila vsa prizadevanja preživelih, da bi dosegli pravico tako na sodiščih ZDA kot na indijskih sodiščih, do sedaj neuspešna;
Stresses that the overall efforts by survivors to get proper justice through both the US and Indian courts have so far been unsuccessful;
poziva k neodvisni preiskavi trenutnih razmer v Bhopalu, če je mogoče, pod okriljem Odbora za človekove pravice OZN, v kateri bi sodelovali posebni poročevalci, ki bi obiskali Indijo ter preučili učinek dejavnosti UCIL/UCC in nesreče v Bhopalu na onesnaženost podtalnice in okolja ter posledično na človekove pravice prizadetih skupnosti;
Calls for an independent inquiry into the current situation in Bhopal, possibly under the auspices of the UN Commission on Human Rights, engaging the relevant Special Rapporteurs to visit India in order to examine the effect of UCIL/UCC activities and the Bhopal disaster on contamination of the groundwater and the environment, and consequently on the human rights of affected communities;
podpira pobudo Svetovne zdravstvene organizacije, ki je bila sprožena decembra 2001 v okviru Mednarodnega programa kemijske varnosti za izboljšanje tako nacionalne kot globalne pripravljenosti in odziva na kemijske nesreče s pomočjo razvoja sistema zgodnjega opozarjanja ter programa krepitve zmogljivosti v državah članicah;
Supports the World Health Organization initiative launched in December 2001, through the International Programme on Chemical Safety, for improving both national and global chemical incident preparedness and response through the development of an early warning system and a programme of capacity strengthening in Member States;
poudarja, da so bili glavni razlogi za nesrečo slabe delovne razmere, pomanjkanje kakršnihkoli varnostnih sistemov in popolnoma neprimerna ocenitev tveganj v tovarni v Bhopalu, dejstva, ki so bila dobro poznana izvršilnemu vodstvu tovarne kakor tudi indijskim oblastem;
Underlines that bad working conditions, the lack of any proper security systems and totally inadequate risk assessment in the plant in Bhopal, elements which were well known to the executive management of the plant as well to the Indian authorities, were the main causes of the disaster;
meni, da morata biti zagotavljanje zdravja in varnosti na delovnem mestu predpogoj za vse družbe, ki investirajo v državah v razvoju, če hočemo v prihodnosti preprečiti takšne nesreče;
Considers that ensuring health and safety in the workplace should be a prerequisite for all corporations investing in developing countries, if such a disaster is to be avoided in the future;
zahteva od Komisije, da preuči načine, kako bi lahko Evropska unija pripomogla k popolni in dokončni dekontaminaciji predela in v vmesnem času k zagotavljanju oskrbe s pitno vodo;
Calls on the Commission to look into ways in which the European Union could assist in the comprehensive and definitive decontamination of the site and, in the meantime, in ensuring the supply of drinking water;
pozdravlja zakonodajne predloge Komisije ( KOM(2003)0644 ) za večjo razpoložljivost podatkov o približno 30 000 kemičnih snoveh trenutno v rabi;
Welcomes the Commission's legislative proposals ( COM(2003)0644 ) to make more information available about some 30 000 chemical substances currently in use;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Odboru za človekove pravice OZN, indijski vladi, vladi zvezne države Madhya Pradesh in družbi Dow Chemical Company.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the UN Commission on Human Rights, the Governments of India and Madhya Pradesh and the Dow Chemical Company.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1260/1999 o splošnih določbah o strukturnih skladih v zvezi s podaljšanjem trajanja programa PEACE in v zvezi z novimi odobritvami za prevzem obveznosti ( KOM(2004)0631 – 16064/2004 – C6-0252/2004 – 2004/0224(AVC) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds concerning the extension of the duration of the PEACE programme and the granting of new commitment appropriations ( COM(2004)0631 – 16064/2004 - C6-0252/2004 – 2004/0224(AVC) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Uredbe Sveta ( KOM(2004)0631 – 16064/2004) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation ( COM(2004)0631 - 16064/2004) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju zahteve Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta na podlagi člena 161 Pogodbe ES ( C6-0252/2004 ),
having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 161 of the EC Treaty ( C6-0252/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za regionalni razvoj in mnenja Odbora za proračun ( A6-0001/2005 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Regional Development and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0001/2005 ),
da privolitev k predlogu Uredbe Sveta;
Gives its assent to the proposal for a Council regulation;
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in še zlasti členov 21(2) in 195 Pogodbe,
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 21, second paragraph, and 195 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in še zlasti člena 107d Pogodbe,
having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 107d thereof,
ob upoštevanju svojega Sklepa z dne 9. marca 1994 o pravilih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje funkcije varuha človekovih pravic UL L 113, 4.5.1994, str.
having regard to its decision of 9 March 1994 on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties OJ L 113, 4.5.1994, p.
, kakor je bil spremenjen s sklepom z dne 14. marca 2002 UL L 92, 9.4.2002, str.
, as amended by its decision of 14 March 2002 OJ L 92, 9.4.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju člena 194 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 194 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju javnega razpisa UL C 213, 25.8.2004, str.
having regard to the call for applications OJ C 213, 25.8.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju glasovanja z dne 11. januarja 2005,
having regard to its vote of 11 January 2005,
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj poskrbi za objavo priloženega sklepa v Uradnem listu Evropske unije;
Instructs its President to have the annexed decision published in the Official Journal of the European Union;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje ta sklep Svetu, Komisiji in Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti.
Instructs its President to forward this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Justice.
SKLEP EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
z dne 11. januarja 2005 o imenovanju Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic
of 11 January 2005 appointing the European Ombudsman
ob upoštevanju pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in še zlasti členov 21(2) in 195 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 21, second paragraph, and 195 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti za atomsko energijo in še zlasti člena 107d Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 107d thereof,
ob upoštevanju člena 194 svojega Poslovnika,
Having regard to Rule 194 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju glasovanja z dne 11. januarja 2005,
Having regard to its vote of 11 January 2005,
JE SKLENIL:
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS je bil imenovan za Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic.
Mr Nikiforos DIAMANDOUROS has been appointed European Ombudsman.
V Strasbourgu, 11. januarja 2005
Done at Strasbourg, 11 January 2005
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o Skupnem stališču Sveta z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Direktiv Sveta 72/166/EGS, 84/5/EGS, 88/357/EGS in 90/232/EGS ter Direktive 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti (16182/2/2003 – C6-0112/2004 – 2002/0124(COD))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position for adopting a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directives 72/166/EEC, 84/5/EEC, 88/357/EEC and 90/232/EEC and Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (16182/2/2003 – C6-0112/2004 – 2002/0124(COD) )
ob upoštevanju Skupnega stališča Sveta (16182/2/2003 – C6-0112/2004 ),
having regard to the Council common position (16182/2/2003 – C6-0112/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju svojega stališča iz prve obravnave UL C 82 E, 1.4.2004, str.
having regard to its position at first reading OJ C 82 E, 1.4.2004, p.
o predlogu Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2002)0244 ) UL C 227 E, 24.9.2002, str.
on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2002)0244 ) OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0073/2004 )
having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0073/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti prvega in tretjega stavka člena 47(2), člena 55 in člena 95(1) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the first and third sentences of Article 47(2), Article 55 and Article 95(1) thereof,
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije UL C 227 E, 24.9.2002, str.
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission OJ C 227 E, 24.9.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C 95, 23.4.2003, str.
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C 95, 23.4.2003, p.
Evropskega parlamenta z dne 22. oktobra 2003 (
of the European Parliament of 22 October 2003 (
), skupno stališče Sveta z dne
), Council Common Position of
26. aprila 2004 (še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu) in Stališče
26 April 2004
Evropskega parlamenta z dne
(not yet published in the Official Journal) and Position of the European Parliament of
12. januarja 2005
12 January 2005
Zavarovanje civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil (avtomobilsko zavarovanje) je posebnega pomena za evropske državljane, bodisi kot zavarovance ali kot oškodovance nesreče.
Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (motor insurance) is of special importance for European citizens, whether they are policyholders or victims of an accident.
Izjemnega pomena je tudi za zavarovalnice, saj predstavlja pomemben del neživljenjskega zavarovalniškega poslovanja Skupnosti.
It is also a major concern for insurance undertakings as it constitutes an important part of non-life insurance business in the Community.
Avtomobilsko zavarovanje ima tudi vpliv na prosto gibanje ljudi in vozil.
Motor insurance also has an impact on the free movement of persons and vehicles.
Zelo pomemben napredek v tej smeri je bil dosežen že z Direktivo Sveta 72/166/EGS z dne 24. aprila 1972 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil in o izvajanju obveznosti zavarovanja takšne odgovornosti UL L 103, 2.5.1972, str.
Very significant advances in this direction have already been achieved by Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability OJ L 103, 2.5.1972, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 84/5/EGS (UL L 8, 11.1.1984, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 84/5/EEC (OJ L 8, 11.1.1984, p.
, z Drugo direktivo Sveta 84/5/EGS z dne 30. decembra 1983 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil UL L 8, 11.1.1984, str.
, by Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles OJ L 8, 11.1.1984, p.
Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 90/232/EGS (UL L 129, 19.5.1990, str.
Directive as last amended by Directive 90/232/EEC (OJ L 129, 19.5.1990, p.
, s Tretjo direktivo Sveta z dne 14. maja 1990 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju civilne odgovornosti pri uporabi motornih vozil UL L 129, 19.5.1990, str.
, by Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles OJ L 129, 19.5.1990, p.
in z Direktivo 2000/26/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. maja 2000 o približevanju zakonodaje držav članic o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti (Četrta direktiva o zavarovanju avtomobilske odgovornosti) UL L 181, 20.7.2000, str.
and by Directive 2000/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 May 2000 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (Fourth motor insurance Directive) OJ L 181, 20.7.2000, p.
Sistem avtomobilskega zavarovanja Skupnosti je treba posodobiti in izboljšati.
The Community system of motor insurance needs to be updated and improved.
Da se izključi morebitna napačna razlaga določb Direktive 72/166/EGS in da se olajša pridobitev zavarovalnega kritja za vozila, opremljena z začasnimi tablicami, naj se opredelitev ozemlja, kjer se vozilo običajno nahaja, nanaša na ozemlje države, katere registrsko tablico ima to vozilo, ne glede na to, ali je tablica stalna ali začasna.
In order to exclude any possible misinterpretation of the provisions of Directive 72/166/EEC and to make it easier to obtain insurance cover for vehicles bearing temporary plates, the definition of the territory in which the vehicle is normally based should refer to the territory of the State of which the vehicle bears a registration plate, irrespective of whether such a plate is permanent or temporary.
V skladu z Direktivo 72/166/EGS se za vozila, ki so opremljena z napačnimi ali nezakonitimi tablicami, šteje, da izvirajo iz ozemlja države članice, ki je izdala originalne tablice.
In accordance with Directive 72/166/EEC, vehicles bearing false or illegal plates are considered to be normally based in the territory of the Member State that issued the original plates.
To pravilo pogosto pomeni, da morajo nacionalni zavarovalni biroji obravnavati ekonomske posledice nesreč, ki nimajo nikakršne povezave z državo članico, kjer imajo sedež.
This rule often means that national insurers' bureaux are obliged to deal with the economic consequences of accidents which do not have any connection with the Member State where they are established.
Z namenom olajšati razlago in uporabo izraza "naključno preverjanje" v Direktivi 72/166/ES je treba podrobneje pojasniti ustrezne določbe.
In order to facilitate the interpretation and application of the term "random checks" in Directive 72/166/EEC, the relevant provision should be clarified.