natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
globoko obžaluje, da vse do danes Parlament še ni prejel informacij glede analize stroškov in koristi kontrolnih sistemov za sredstva EU, kot je bilo zahtevano resoluciji, priloženi k sklepu o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2005;
Deeply regrets the fact that so far it has not received any information about the cost-benefit analysis of the control system for EU funds, as it had requested in the resolution accompanying the decision on discharge in respect of the financial year 2005;
meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da Komisija zmanjšuje revizijske rezultate Računskega sodišča, ki temeljijo na široko sprejetih mednarodnih revizijskih standardih zaradi "razlik v mnenju o vrsti in vplivu napak ter o ocenjevanju sistemskih pomanjkljivosti, prav tako pa deloma različnih mnenj glede delovanja mehanizmov za finančne popravke" (stran 2, zadnji odstavek);
Finds it unacceptable that the Commission reduces the ECA's audit results, which are based on widely accepted international audit standards, to "differences of opinion on the typology and impact of error and on the evaluation of systems deficiencies, and partly the different perceptions regarding the operation of financial correction mechanisms" (page 2, last paragraph);
meni, da se morajo vse rezervacije glede pomanjkanja zagotovila o zakonitosti in pravilnosti porabe Skupnosti, odražati v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih pa tudi v sinteznem poročilu; zato je zelo presenečen, da so se trije generalni direktorati šele leta 2006 odločili, da vključijo rezervacije glede upravljanja in kontrole INTERREG, ki po njihovih besedah obstajajo že več let (stran 4, zadnji odstavek);
Is of the opinion that all reservations concerning a lack of assurance as to the legality and regularity of Community spending should be reflected in the annual activity reports, as well as in the Synthesis Report; finds it therefore highly surprising that three Directors-General decided only in 2006 to insert a reservation concerning the management and control of INTERREG, which, as noted by them, had already existed for some years (page 4, last paragraph);
je zaskrbljen zaradi izjav notranjega revizorja v svojem prvem preglednem poročilu, v katerem navaja, da polovica kritičnih in zelo pomembnih priporočil kljub napredku ni bila izvedena pred določenimi ciljnimi datumi (stran 8, pred zadnjim odstavkom); poziva Komisijo, naj bolj poudari izvajanje teh priporočil;
Is concerned about the statements of the Internal Auditor in his first Overview Report which indicate that, despite some progress, half of the critical and very important recommendations have not been implemented before the target dates set (page 8, before the last paragraph); asks the Commission to put more emphasis on implementation of these recommendations;
Letna poročila o dejavnostih
Annual activity reports
z obžalovanjem ugotavlja, da je v skladu z Računskim sodiščem: "(...) pri pomembnih delih proračuna EU mnenje generalnih direktorjev o zakonitosti in pravilnosti porabe EU pozitivnejše, kot bi bilo skladno z revizijo Sodišča" (točka 2.13 letnega poročila);
Notes with regret that according to the ECA:"(...) in significant parts of the EU budget, the Directors-General give a more positive account on the legality and regularity of the EU spending than is consistent with the ECA's audit" (point 2.13 of the Annual Report);
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče v svojem letnem poročilu ponovno poudarilo, da nekatera letna poročila o dejavnostih še vedno ne vključujejo zadostnih dokazov za izjavo o zanesljivosti (točke 2.14 do 2.18 letnega poročila);
Regrets the fact that in its Annual Report the ECA emphasised once again that some of the annual activity reports still do not include sufficient evidence for its statement of assurance (points 2.14 to 2.18 of the Annual Report);
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je bilo v zbirnem poročilu poudarjeno, da "v vseh primerih, v katerih se mnenji Evropskega računskega sodišča in generalnega direktorja razlikujeta, mora slednji svoje mnenje predstaviti v naslednjem letnem poročilu o delu" (točka 2), in upa, da bodo izboljšave vidne v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih za leto 2007 in prihodnja leta;
Welcomes the fact that the Synthesis Report stresses that "[i]n all instances where there is a difference between the European Court of Auditors' opinion and that of the Director-General, the latter will have to explain it in his/her next year's annual activity report" (point 2), and hopes that improvements will be visible in the 2007 annual activity reports and onwards;
poziva Komisijo, naj z vzpostavitvijo skupnih meril za pripravo rezervacij in večjo formalizacijo letnih poročil o dejavnostih izboljša ta poročila, da omogoči boljšo primerjavo med letnimi poročili o dejavnostih generalnih direktoratov in skozi čas; poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva pripombe Računskega sodišča o letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, in naj izboljšave pripravi v tesnem sodelovanju z Računskim sodiščem;
Asks the Commission to improve the annual activity reports through the establishment of common criteria for the making of reservations and their stronger formalisation so as to allow greater comparability between the annual activity reports of different Directorate-Generals and over time; asks the Commission to take account of the observations made by the ECA on the annual activity reports and to make improvements in close consultation with it;
pozdravlja objavo sporočila Nadaljnji ukrepi po objavi Zelene knjige "Pobuda za preglednost v Evropi" ( KOM(2007)0127 ), v kateri Komisija v skladu s členom 30(3) Finančne uredbe navaja, da bodo podatki o upravičencih do sredstev EU javno dostopni od leta 2008 naprej (oddelek 2.3.2.) in izjavlja, da bo "spomladi leta 2008" odprt register zastopnikov interesov (lobistov);
Welcomes the publication of the Follow Up to the Green Paper on ETI ( COM(2007)0127 ), in which the Commission states, in accordance with Article 30(3) of the Financial Regulation, that information on beneficiaries of EU funds will be publicly available as of 2008 (section 2.3.2) and declares that it will "in spring 2008" launch a register for interest representatives (lobbyists);
opozarja na potrebo po novemu kodeksu ravnanja za člane Komisije, da se izboljša skupna politična pristojnost in odgovornost za politične sklepe, pa tudi za izvajanje politike s strani njihovih služb;
Recalls the need for a new code of conduct for Members of the Commission so as to improve and define more clearly their individual and collective political responsibility and accountability for their decisions and for the implementation of their policies by their services;
vztraja pri odgovornosti Komisije za zagotavljanje popolnosti, možnosti iskanja in primerljivosti podatkov, ki jih posredujejo upravičenci do sredstev EU, in opozarja na pisni odgovor Komisije Parlamentu, v katerem je določena namera, da se pred aprilom 2008 dokonča in doseže dogovor z državami članicami o skupnih standardih za takšne nize informacije;
Insists on the Commission's responsibility for ensuring the completeness, searchability and comparability of data provided on the beneficiaries of EU funding, and recalls the Commission's written answer to Parliament in which the intention to finalise and reach agreement with Member States before April 2008 on common standards for such data is set out;
opozarja na svoje pripombe iz točke 85 v resoluciji o razrešnici za proračunsko leto 2005, v katerih se je zahteval enostaven dostop do informacij o tem, kdo je zastopan v različnih strokovnih skupinah in kakšne so njihove naloge, ter iz točke 86, v kateri je bila Komisija pozvana, da objavi imena oseb, ki sodelujejo v teh skupinah, in imena posebnih svetovalcev, ki so jih zaposlili posamezni člani Komisije, generalni direktorji ali kabineti; poziva, da je treba javno objaviti imena vseh strokovnjakov in svetovalcev v delovnih skupinah Komisije;
Recalls its observation at paragraph 85 of the resolution accompanying the discharge decision in respect of the financial year 2005 to request easy access to information on who is represented in the various forms of expert groups and what their tasks are, and its observation at paragraph 86 to call on the Commission to publish the names of the people who take part in these groups, and the names of the special advisers which the individual Members of the Commission, Directors-General or cabinets engage; asks that the names of all experts and counsellors in the Commission's working groups be made public;
opozarja na odgovore, ki so jih je Komisija podala Parlamentu med predstavitvijo članov Komisije, pristojnih za razrešnico, ki je potekala 21. januarja 2008, iz katerih izhaja, da bodo registri strokovnih skupin vsebovali vse takšne skupine, vključno z informacijami o članih komitoloških odborov, posameznih strokovnjakih, skupnih subjektih in odborih za socialni dialog;
Recalls the answers given by the Member of the Commission responsible for the discharge at the hearing of the Committee on Budgetary Control of 21 January 2008 to the effect that the register of expert groups will contain all such groups, including information on members of comitology committees, individual experts, joint entities and social dialogue committees;
opozarja na zahtevo v odstavku 76 svoje resolucije o razrešnici za leto 2005, da v zavezujoč kodeks ravnanja komisarjev vključi temeljne etične standarde in vodilna načela, ki jih morajo komisarji spoštovati pri opravljanju svoje funkcije, predvsem pri imenovanju sodelavcev, zlasti v svojem kabinetu;
Also recalls the request made at paragraph 76 of its resolution accompanying the discharge decision in respect of the financial year 2005 "to ensure that the Commissioners' binding code of conduct incorporates the necessary ethical rules and the principal guidelines to be observed by Members of the Commission in the conduct of their office, in particular when appointing colleagues, especially to their 'cabinets'";
obžaluje odgovor, ki ga je Komisija podala v prilogi k svojemu zgoraj navedenemu poročilu o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi postopka razrešnice za leto 2005, saj ta pravila še ne obstajajo in poziva Komisijo, naj jih sprejme;
Regrets the answer given by the Commission in the annex to its above-mentioned report on the follow-up to the 2005 discharge procedure (page 18) to the effect that these rules do not yet exist, and urges the Commission to adopt them;
opozarja na pomen popolne preglednosti in obveščanja glede osebja v kabinetih članov Komisije, ki ni bilo zaposleno v skladu s Kadrovskimi predpisi;
Recalls the importance of complete transparency and publicity with regard to staff of cabinets of Members of the Commission not recruited in accordance with the Staff Regulations;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so po mnenju Računskega sodišča vsi pomembni vidiki sistemov za carinski nadzor zadovoljivi, da so izkazi glede tradicionalnih lastnih sredstev zanesljivi in da so poslovni dogodki zakoniti in pravilni, čeprav so še vedno prisotne določene pomanjkljivosti;
Welcomes the fact that the ECA considered that in all material respects the systems for customs supervision were satisfactory, that the accounts regarding traditional own resources were reliable and that the underlying transactions were legal and regular, even if some weaknesses persisted;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da je Komisija sredstva iz naslova DDV in BND po oceni Računskega sodišča pravilno izračunala, zbrala in vknjižila na račune Skupnosti;
Welcomes also the fact that the ECA found the VAT and GNI resources to be correctly calculated, collected and entered in the Community accounts by the Commission;
glede sredstev iz DDV z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da je Komisija ohranila pogostost in kakovost svojih inšpekcijskih pregledov; vendar pa je zaskrbljen zaradi števila neporavnanih rezerv in zato Komisijo poziva, da si v sodelovanju z državami članicami še naprej prizadeva zagotoviti odpravo rezerv v razumnem časovnem okviru;
Notes with satisfaction, regarding the VAT resource, that the Commission maintained the frequency and quality of its inspections; is concerned, however, at the number of outstanding reservations, and therefore calls on the Commission, in co-operation with the Member States, to continue its efforts to ensure that reservations are lifted within reasonable time frames;
poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu sporoči, kaj namerava storiti v primeru držav članic s stalnimi rezervami;
Asks the Commission to communicate to it what action it intends to take in the case of Member States with continued reservations;
pozdravlja splošno izboljšanje na področju izdatkov za SKP in izjavo Računskega sodišča, da je integrirani administrativni in kontrolni sistem (IAKS), ki je glavno orodje za kontroliranje pomoči na površino, premij za živali in sheme enotnega plačila na površino, učinkovit sistem za omejevanje tveganja za nepravilne odhodke, če se pravilno uporablja;
Welcomes the general improvement in CAP expenditure in 2006 and the ECA's statement that the IACS, which is the main control tool for area aid, animal premiums and the single area payment scheme, is an effective system in limiting the risk of irregular expenditure, if properly applied;
ceni prizadevanja Komisije za razširitev uporabe IAKS-a in pričakuje, da bo Komisija v skladu z načrti in odgovori, ki jih je predstavila Parlamentu, zagotovila, da bo odstotek odhodkov za kmetijstvo, ki ga pokriva IAKS, vsaj 89 % do konca leta 2010 in 91,3 % do konca leta 2013;
Appreciates the efforts of the Commission to broaden the application of the IACS and expects the Commission to ensure, in accordance with the plans and answers presented to Parliament, that the percentage of agricultural expenditure covered by the IACS will be at least 89 % by 2010 and 91,3 % by 2013;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da so napake še vedno pomembno vplivale na odhodke za SKP, in obžaluje dejstvo, da se kontrole in preverjanja v okviru IAKS-a še vedno ne izvršujejo učinkovito oziroma še niso popolnoma zanesljivi v nekaterih državah članicah, in zato poziva Komisijo, naj z državami članicami dvojno preveri, da se IAKS v celoti izvaja v vseh državah članicah EU-15 in da se pomanjkljivosti, ki so bile odkrite v državah članicah EU-10 odpravijo;
Regrets the ECA's finding that CAP expenditure was still materially affected by errors and the fact that controls and checks implemented under the IACS are still not effectively enforced or are not yet completely reliable in some Member States, and thus urges the Commission to double-check with the Member States that the IACS is fully implemented in all EU-15 Member States and that the weaknesses found in the EU-10 Member States are remedied;
obžaluje, da je Računsko sodišče ponovno ugotovilo težave pri izvajanju IAKS-a v Grčiji; popolnoma podpira namen Komisije (kot je bil naveden v Odboru za proračunski nadzor), da strogo uveljavlja obstoječo zakonodajo glede začasne ustavitve plačil, če grška vlada v določenem roku ne odpravi trenutnih težav;
Regrets the fact that the ECA once again detected problems in the implementation of the IACS in Greece; fully supports the Commission's intention (as stated to its Committee on Budgetary Control) to ensure that current legislation on the suspension of payments is strictly enforced if the Greek Government does not remedy the existing problems within the time-limits set;
obžaluje dejstvo, da je pri kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepih na področju razvoja podeželja stopnja napak običajno visoka, saj kmetje ne izpolnjujejo pogosto zapletenih pogojev za upravičenost; meni, da bi morala Komisija pri teh ukrepih ustrezno preučiti primernost pogojev za upravičenost in preučiti možnosti za njihovo poenostavitev;
Regrets the fact that in rural development, agri-environmental measures are prone to a high incidence of errors because farmers do not meet the often complex eligibility conditions; considers that the Commission should give due consideration to the pertinence of eligibility conditions for such measures and study the possibility of simplifying those conditions;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija navedla morebitno potrebo po uporabi različne ravni dopustnega tveganja na kmetijskem in okoljskem področju, da se tako vzpostavi pravilno ravnovesje med izboljšanjem in zaščito okolja ter odhodki za kontrolo uporabljenih ukrepov; vendar vztraja pri zagotavljanju pravilnega izvajanja in zadostne kontrole nad porabo Skupnosti in poziva Komisijo, da izvede temeljito preiskavo in preuči možne stroške in koristi na področju kmetijsko-okoljskih ukrepov, kakor tudi povezavo z drugimi področji porabe, ter predstavi analizo Svetu, Parlamentu in Računskemu sodišču kot minimalno podlago za razpravo o potrebi po reformi, ki jo je nakazala Komisija;
Notes the Commission's reference to the possible need to apply a different level of tolerable risk to the agro-environmental area in order to strike the right balance between improving and protecting the environment and the costs of controlling the measures applied; insists, however, on the correct application and sufficient control of Community spending, and invites the Commission to thoroughly investigate and assess the possible costs and benefits in the area of agro-environmental measures, as well as the connection to other areas of spending, and to present this analysis to the Council, Parliament and the ECA as a minimum basis for discussing the need for reform, as indicated by the Commission;
ugotavlja, da odkar novi postopek potrditve obračunov skrbi za nepravilnosti, ki jih imajo države članice za nepopravljive, in zneski bremenijo Skupnost na podlagi informacij iz držav članic, mora Komisija sedaj izvesti podrobno spremljanje, da zagotovi, da dolgovi pravilno in ustrezno bremenijo proračun Skupnosti;
Notes that, since the new financial clearance procedure provides for irregularities which Member States consider to be irrecoverable, and amounts are charged to the Community on the basis of information from the Member States, the Commission must now carry out a detailed follow-up to ensure that the debts are correct and properly charged to the Community budget;
opozarja tudi, da stroške finančnih popravkov nosijo države članice, običajno davkoplačevalci, namesto da bi jih nosili upravičenci nepravilno izplačane pomoči;
Recalls also that the cost of financial corrections is borne by the Member States, usually by the taxpayer, rather than by the beneficiaries of the aid irregularly paid;
v skladu z navedbami Računskega sodišča ugotavlja, da Komisija pri reviziji sheme enotnega plačila (prvič leta 2006) ni opredelila obsega in intenzivnosti dela za certifikacijske organe in so tako nekateri organi (na primer v Italiji) izvzeli iz svojega dela preverjanje pravic in to le omenili v svojih potrdilih, Komisija pa je to sprejela brez pripomb;
Notes that, according to the ECA, when auditing the single payment scheme (for the first time in 2006), the Commission did not specify the scope and depth of the work of the certifying bodies, and some certifying bodies (in Italy for example) excluded verification of entitlements, only mentioning it in their certificates, and the Commission accepted this without comment;
obžaluje, da Komisija stopnje nepravilnih plačil, ki jih financira SKP, ne pozna ali je še ni ocenila na način, ki bi bil po mnenju Računskega sodišča ustrezen; ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da popravkov za nepravilna plačila, za katera je najvišji ocenjeni znesek 100 milijonov EUR, ni bilo mogoče opraviti, ker so bila odkrita po izteku roka; poziva Komisijo, naj za revizije skladnosti nameni ustrezna sredstva, da izvede popravke za nepravilna plačila v časovnem roku;
Regrets that the level of irregular payments financed by the CAP is not yet known or estimated by the Commission in a way considered appropriate by the ECA; notes that the ECA found that corrections for irregular payments with an estimated maximum amount of EUR 100 million could not be made, as they were discovered after the two-year time limit; invites the Commission to allocate adequate resources for conformity audits in order to execute corrections for irregular payments within the time limit;
meni, da bi morala Komisija vse pomanjkljivosti, ki jih je Računsko sodišče navedlo v letnem poročilu, odpraviti, da se ponudi višja stopnja zagotovila, ki ga je mogoče pridobiti iz dela certifikacijskih organov;
Considers that all the weaknesses referred to by the ECA in its Annual Report should be resolved by the Commission in order to ensure a higher level of assurance concerning the work of the certification bodies;
je seznanjen z zaključki iz točk 5.20 in 5.21 letnega poročila Računskega sodišča za leto 2006 in zato poziva Komisijo, da izboljša preglede v Združenem kraljestvu, ki ni ravnalo v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, ko je lastnikom zemljišč dodelilo pravice ter jim izplačalo shemo enotnih plačil (SEP) in pomoč za razvoj podeželja za zemljišča, ki so jih dali v najem in jih obdelujejo kmetje najemniki, ter tudi nekatere države članice (Avstrija, Irska in Združeno kraljestvo), ki niso pravilno uporabljale nekaterih ključnih elementov SEP in so konsolidacijo pravic razširile tako, da presega določbe Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1782/2003 z dne 29. septembra 2003 o skupnih pravilih za sheme neposrednih podpor v okviru skupne kmetijske politike in o uvedbi nekaterih shem podpor za kmete UL L 270, 21.10.2003, str.
Takes note of the conclusions set out at points 5.20 and 5.21of the ECA's Annual Report, and urges the Commission to improve checks in the UK, which did not comply with Community legislation when allocating entitlements and paying Single Payment Scheme (SPS) and rural development aid to landlords for land let to and farmed by lessee farmers, and in those Member States (Austria, Ireland and the UK) which failed to correctly apply certain key elements of the SPS and extended consolidation of entitlements beyond the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p.
Uredba, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo Komisije (ES) št. 293/2008 (UL L 90, 2.4.2008, str.
Regulation as last amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 293/2008 (OJ L 90, 2.4.2008, p.
je seznanjen z zelo jasno izjavo Komisije, tako v odgovorih Računskemu sodišču (točka 5.27 letnega poročila) kot pred Odborom za proračunski nadzor Parlamenta, da nihče ni upravičen do kmetijske pomoči, če ne opravlja kmetijske dejavnosti; pričakuje, da bo Komisija spremljala primere, ki jih je identificiralo Računsko sodišče, in bo zagotovila, da ne bodo opravljena plačila – v primeru, da so že bila opravljena, pa bodo izterjana – lastnikom zemljišč, ki ne opravljajo kmetijske dejavnosti;
Takes note of the very clear affirmation of the Commission, both in answer to the ECA (point 5.27 of the Annual Report) and its Committee on Budgetary Control, that no beneficiary is eligible for agricultural support unless that person exercises an agricultural activity; expects the Commission to follow up on the cases identified by the ECA, and to make sure that no payments will be made, and will be recovered where they have been made, to landowners who do not exercise an agricultural activity;
v luči izjave Računskega sodišča, iz katere izhaja, da so med več kot 700 novimi upravičenci golf klubi, kriket klubi, prostočasni klubi/živalski vrtovi, jahalni klubi, železniške družbe in mestni sveti, poziva Komisijo, da pripravi splošni pregled in oceno razvoja na področju dodeljevanja kmetijske pomoči takšnim upravičencem, ki so upravičeni do sredstev v okviru veljavnih pravil;
Invites the Commission, in light of the statement by the ECA that more than 700 new beneficiaries belong to categories such as golf clubs, cricket clubs, leisure parks/zoos, horse riding establishments, railway companies and city councils, to provide an overview and an assessment of the development of allocation of agricultural support to such beneficiaries, who are eligible for funding under the current rules;