natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker s tem v zvezi obstaja znatna vsebinska razlika med običajnimi mednarodnimi sporazumi in ustanovitvenimi pogodbami Evropske unije, saj so slednje vzpostavile nov pravni red in imajo svoje institucije, v korist katerih so države članice omejile svoje suverene pravice na vedno širših področjih, in katerim niso podrejene le države članice, temveč tudi njihovi državljani, varuhi tega pravnega reda pa so Sodišče Evropske unije in redna sodišča držav članic;
G. whereas, in this context, there is a substantial difference between ordinary international agreements and the founding treaties of the European Union, the latter having established a new legal order, possessing its own institutions, for the benefit of which the States have limited their sovereign rights in ever wider fields, to which not only Member States but also their nationals are subject, with the guardians of that legal order being the Court of Justice of the European Union and the ordinary courts and tribunals of the Member States;
H. ker mora enotno patentno sodišče tako kot vsa nacionalna sodišča v celoti spoštovati in uporabljati pravo Unije, v sodelovanju s Sodiščem Evropske unije;
H. whereas the Unified Patent Court must fully respect and apply Union law, in cooperation with the Court of Justice of the European Union as is the case for any national court;
I. ker bi moralo enotno patentno sodišče izhajati iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unija in nanj naslavljati prošnje za predhodno odločanje v skladu s členom 267 PDEU;
I. whereas the Unified Patent Court should rely on the case-law of the Court of Justice by requesting preliminary rulings in accordance with Article 267 TFEU;
J. ker bi bilo na podlagi členov 258, 259 in 260 PDEU treba zagotoviti spoštovanje primarnosti in ustrezno uporabo prava Unije;
J. whereas respect for the primacy and proper application of Union law should be ensured on the basis of Articles 258, 259 and 260 TFEU;
K. ker bi moralo biti enotno patentno sodišče del sodnih sistemov držav pogodbenic in imeti izključno pristojnost za evropske patente z enotno veljavnostjo in za evropske patente, v katerih je imenovana ena ali več držav pogodbenic;
K. whereas the Unified Patent Court should be part of the judicial systems of the Contracting Member States, with exclusive competence for European patents with unitary effect and for European patents designating one or more Contracting Member States;
L. ker je za učinkovit sodni sistem potrebna decentralizirana prva stopnja;
L. whereas an efficient court system needs a decentralised first instance;
M. ker je učinkovitost sistema reševanja sporov odvisna od kakovosti in izkušenj sodnikov;
M. whereas the efficiency of the litigation system depends on the quality and experience of the judges;
N. ker bi morala obstajati enotna postopkovna pravila za vse postopke na vseh oddelkih in stopnjah sodišča;
N. whereas there should be one set of procedural rules applicable to proceedings before all divisions and instances of the court;
O. ker bi si moralo enotno patentno sodišče prizadevati za kakovostne odločbe brez nepotrebno dolgotrajnih postopkov in bi moralo pomagati zlasti malim in srednjim podjetjem, da zavarujejo svoje pravice ali se branijo pred neutemeljenimi zahtevki ali patenti, ki bi jih bilo treba preklicati;
O. whereas the Unified Patent Court should strive to provide high quality decisions without undue procedural delays, and should help, in particular, SMEs to protect their rights or to defend themselves against unsubstantiated claims or patents which merit revocation;
3. vztraja, da mora Sodišče Evropske unije kot varuh prava Unije zagotoviti enakost pravnega reda v Uniji in primarnost evropskega prava na tem področju;
Insists that the Court of Justice, as guardian of Union law, must ensure uniformity of the Union legal order and the primacy of European law in this context;
5. poudarja, da bi morala biti prednostna naloga enotnega patentnega sodišča okrepitev pravne varnosti in boljše uveljavljanje patentov s poštenim ravnotežjem med interesi imetnikov pravic in vpletenih strani;
Stresses that the Unified Patent Court’s priority should be to enhance legal certainty and to improve the enforcement of patents while striking a fair balance between the interests of right holders and parties concerned;
(i) države pogodbenice so lahko samo države članice Evropske unije;
(i) the Contracting Member States can only be Member States of the European Union;
(ii) sporazum naj začne veljati, ko ga ratificira najmanj trinajst držav članic pogodbenic, vključno s tremi državami članicami, v katerih je v letu pred letom, v katerem je potekala diplomatska konferenca za podpis sporazuma, veljalo največ evropskih patentov;
(ii) the Agreement should come into force when a minimum of thirteen Contracting Member States, including the three Member States in which the highest number of European patents was in force in the year preceding the year in which the Diplomatic Conference for the signature of the Agreement takes place, have ratified the Agreement;
(iii) sodišče bi moralo biti skupno sodišče za vse države pogodbenice, zanj pa bi morale veljati enake obveznosti spoštovanja prava Unije kot za vsako nacionalno sodišče; tako bi na primer ob uporabi člena 267 PDEU sodelovalo s Sodiščem Evropske unije;
(iii) the Court should be a Court common to the Contracting Member States and subject to the same obligations as any national court with regard to compliance with Union law; thus, for example, the Court shall cooperate with the Court of Justice by applying Article 267 TFEU;
(iv) sodišče bi moralo delovati v skladu s pravom Unije in spoštovati njegovo primarnost; če bi prizivno sodišče kršilo pravo Unije, bi bile države pogodbenice skupaj odgovorne za škodo, ki bi jo stranke utrpele v postopku; za vse pogodbenice bi se uporabljali postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev na podlagi členov 258, 259 in 260 PDEU;
(iv) the Court should act in line with the body of Union law and respect its primacy; in the event that the Court of Appeal infringes Union law, Contracting Member States should be jointly liable for damages incurred by the parties to the respective procedure; infringement proceedings pursuant to Articles 258, 259 and 260 TFEU against all Contracting Member States should apply;
Ustroj sistema za reševanje patentnih sporov
Structure of the Patent Litigation System
(i) sistem sodišča za reševanje sporov morala sestavljati prva stopnja (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „sodišče prve stopnje“) in stopnja za pritožbe (v nadaljnjem besedilu: „prizivno sodišče“); da bi se izognili neučinkovitosti in dolgotrajnim postopkom, dodatnih stopenj ne bi smelo biti;
(i) the litigation system of the Court should consist of a first instance (‘Court of First Instance’) and an instance for appeal (‘Court of Appeal’); in order to avoid inefficiencies and lengthy proceedings, no further instances should be added;
(ii) decentralizirano prvo stopnjo bi morali poleg osrednjega oddelka sestavljati tudi lokalni in regionalni oddelki;
(ii) a decentralised first instance should consist, in addition to a central division, also of local and regional divisions;
(iii) dodatni lokalni oddelki na prvi stopnji bi se v državi pogodbenici vzpostavili na njeno zahtevo, če se je v tej državi pogodbenici v treh zaporednih letih pred začetkom veljavnosti sporazuma ali po njem začelo več kot sto zadev na koledarsko leto; predlaga tudi, naj država pogodbenica ne bi imela več kot štiri oddelke;
(iii) additional local divisions of the first instance should be set up in a Contracting Member State upon its request when more than 100 cases per calendar year have been commenced in that Contracting Member State during three successive years prior to or subsequent to the date of entry into force of the Agreement; further proposes that the number of divisions in one Contracting Member State should not exceed four;
(iv) regionalni oddelek bi se vzpostavil za dve ali več pogodbenic na njihovo zahtevo;
(iv) a regional division should be set up for two or more Contracting Member States upon their request;
Sestava sodišča in usposobljenost sodnikov
Composition of the Court and qualification of the Judges
(i) priznava, da bi morala prizivno sodišče in sodišče prve stopnje imeti večnacionalno sestavo; poudarja, da mora njihova sestava upoštevati obstoječi ustroj sodišč, hkrati pa se zaveda, da je najvišji cilj ustanovitev novih, resnično enotnih sodišč; zato predlaga, naj sestava lokalnih oddelkov postane večnacionalna čim prej, pri čemer so morebitna odstopanja od tega temeljnega načela možna na podlagi odobritve upravnega odbora za največ petletno prehodno obdobje, hkrati pa je treba zagotoviti, da se standarda kakovosti in učinkovitosti obstoječega ustroja ne znižata; meni, da bi bilo treba to petletno obdobje izkoristiti za intenzivno usposabljanje in pripravo sodnikov;
(i) acknowledges that the composition of the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance should be multinational; considers as regards their composition that account should be taken of the existing court structures, while bearing in mind that the overriding objective is to ensure that the new court is genuinely unified; proposes, therefore, that the composition of the local divisions should become multinational as soon as possible but that reasoned exceptions to this general principle may be made after approval from the Administrative Committee during a transitional period of no more than five years, while it has to be ensured that the standard of quality and efficiency of the existing structures is not reduced; considers that the period of five years should be used for intensive training and preparation for the judges;
(ii) meni, da bi morali sodišče sestavljati tako pravno kot tehnično usposobljeni sodniki; ti bi morali zagotoviti najvišje standarde znanja in dokazano usposobljenost na področju patentnih sporov in protimonopolnega prava; to usposobljenost bi morali med drugim izkazati z ustreznimi poklicnimi izkušnjami in poklicnim usposabljanjem; pravno usposobljeni sodniki bi morali biti ustrezno usposobljeni za imenovanje v sodniško službo v državi pogodbenici; tehnično usposobljeni sodniki bi morali imeti univerzitetno diplomo in strokovno znanje z nekega tehnološkega področja poleg znanja civilnega in civilnega procesnega prava;
(ii) believes that the Court should be composed of both legally qualified and technically qualified judges; the judges should ensure the highest standards of competence and proven capacity in the field of patent litigation and antitrust law; this qualification should be proven inter alia by relevant work experience and professional training; legally qualified judges should possess the qualifications required for judicial offices in a Contracting Member State; technically qualified judges should have a university degree and expertise in a field of technology as well as knowledge of civil and civil procedural law;
(iii) predlaga, da se določbe sporazuma o sestavi sodišča po njegovi uveljavitvi ne bi smele spremeniti, razen če zaradi teh določb ne bodo izpolnjeni cilji sistema reševanja sporov, tj. najvišja kakovost in učinkovitost; predlaga, da bi moral sklepe v zvezi s sestavo sodišča pristojni organ sprejemati soglasno;
(iii) proposes that the provisions of the Agreement on the composition of the Court, once in force, should not be amended unless the objectives of the litigation system, i.e. highest quality and efficiency, are not fulfilled because of these provisions; proposes that decisions regarding the composition of the Court should be taken by the competent body acting unanimously;
(iv) meni, da bi moral sporazum vsebovati varnostne ukrepe, ki bi zagotavljali, da so primerni zgolj sodniki v katerih nevtralnost ni dvoma, zlasti če so bili člani odborov za pritožbe pri nacionalnih patentnih uradih ali Evropskem patentnem uradu;
(iv) is of the opinion that the Agreement should contain safeguards ensuring that judges are only eligible if their neutrality is not in question, especially if they have served as Members of boards of appeal of a national patent office or the EPO;
(i) bi morala enotna postopkovna pravila veljati za postopke na vseh oddelkih in stopnjah sodišča;
(i) one set of procedural rules should be applicable to proceedings before all divisions and instances of the Court;
(ii) bodo sodni postopki pred sodiščem, ki so sestavljeni iz pisnega, začasnega in ustnega postopka, uvedli elemente prilagodljivosti, kot se zdijo primerni, ob upoštevanju ciljev glede hitrosti in učinkovitosti postopka;
(ii) the proceedings before the Court, consisting of a written, interim and oral procedure, shall incorporate the appropriate elements of flexibility, taking into account the objectives of speed and efficiency of proceedings;
(iii) bi moral biti jezik postopkov na katerim koli lokalnem ali regionalnem oddelku uradni jezik države pogodbenice, ki gosti oddelek, ali uradni jezik, ki ga določijo države pogodbenice, ki si delijo regionalni oddelek; stranke bi se lahko dogovorile, da se za jezik postopka uporabi jezik, v katerem je podeljen patent, kar mora odobriti pristojni oddelek; jezik postopka na osrednjem oddelku bi moral biti jezik, v katerem je podeljen patent; jezik postopka na prizivnem sodišču bi moral biti jezik postopka na sodišču prve stopnje;
(iii)the language of proceedings before any local or regional division should be the official language of the Contracting Member State hosting the division or the official language designated by the Contracting Member States sharing a regional division; the parties should be free to chose the language in which the patent was granted as language of proceedings subject to the approval of the competent division; the language of proceedings before the central division should be the language in which the patent concerned was granted; the language of proceedings before the Court of Appeal should be the language of proceedings before the Court of First Instance;
(iv) sodišče bi moralo imeti pristojnost izrekanja predhodnih odredb, s katerimi bi preprečilo možne kršitve in prepovedalo nadaljevanje domnevne kršitve; taka pristojnost pa ne sme voditi v nepravično izbiranje najugodnejšega sodišča; ter
(iv) the Court should have the power to grant preliminary injunctions to prevent any impending infringement and to forbid the continuation of the alleged infringement; such power must, however, not lead to inequitable forum shopping; and
(v) stranke bi morali zastopati samo odvetniki, pooblaščeni za opravljanje tega dela pred sodiščem ene od držav pogodbenic; zastopnikom strank bi lahko pomagali patentni odvetniki, ki bi imeli pravico do besede na zaslišanjih pred sodiščem;
(v) the parties should be represented only by lawyers authorised to practise before a court in any of the Contracting Member States; the representatives of the parties might be assisted by patent attorneys who should be allowed to speak at hearings before the Court;
Pristojnost in učinek odločb sodišča
Jurisdiction and effect of the Court decisions
(i) bi moralo sodišče imeti izključno pristojnost v zvezi z evropskimi patenti z enotno veljavnostjo in evropskimi patenti, v katerih je imenovana ena ali več držav pogodbenic; v ta namen bo treba spremeniti uredbo (ES) št. 44/2001
(i) the Court should have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of European patents with unitary effect and European patents designating one or more Contracting Member States; this will necessitate the amendment of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
UL L 307, 24.11.2001, str.
OJ L 307, 24.11.2001, p.
(ii) bi moral tožnik postopek začeti na lokalnem oddelku, ki ga gosti država pogodbenica, v kateri je kršitev nastala oziroma bi lahko nastala ali v kateri ima sam sedež ali poslovalnico, ali na regionalnem oddelku, v katerem ta država pogodbenica sodeluje; če zadevna država pogodbenica ne gosti lokalnega oddelka in ne sodeluje v regionalnem oddelku, bi moral tožnik postopek začeti na osrednjem oddelku; stranke bi se lahko dogovorile, na katerem oddelku sodišča prve stopnje (lokalnem, regionalnem ali osrednjem) bo uveden postopek;
(ii) the plaintiff should bring the action before the local division hosted by a Contracting Member State where the infringement has occurred or may occur, or where the defendant is domiciled or established, or to the regional division in which this Contracting Member State participates; if the Contracting Member State concerned does not host a local division and does not participate in a regional division, the plaintiff shall bring the action before the central division; the parties should be free to agree before which division of the Court of First Instance (local, regional or central) an action may be brought;
(iii) bi moral imeti v primeru nasprotne tožbe za preklic lokalni ali regionalni oddelek diskrecijsko pravico, da postopek v primeru kršitve nadaljuje neodvisno od tega, ali oddelek prevzame tudi nasprotno tožbo ali jo odstopi osrednjemu oddelku;
(iii) in the event of a counterclaim for revocation, the local or regional division should have the discretion to proceed with the infringement proceeding independently of whether the division proceeds as well with the counterclaim or whether it refers the counterclaim to the central division;
(iv) se pravila o pristojnosti sodišča po uveljavitvi ne bi smela spremeniti, razen če zaradi teh pravil ne bodo izpolnjeni cilji sistema reševanja sporov, tj. najvišja kakovost in učinkovitost; predlaga, da bi moral sklepe v zvezi s pristojnostjo sodišča pristojni organ sprejemati soglasno;
(iv) rules on the jurisdiction of the Court, once in force, should not be amended unless the objectives of the litigation system, i.e. highest quality and efficiency, are not fulfilled because of these rules on jurisdiction; proposes that decisions regarding the jurisdiction of the Court should be taken by the competent body acting unanimously;
(v) bi morale biti odločbe vseh oddelkov sodišča prve stopnje in odločbe prizivnega sodišča izvršljive v kateri koli državi pogodbenici brez potrdila o izvršljivosti;
(v) decisions of all divisions of the Court of First Instance as well as decisions of the Court of Appeal should be enforceable in any Contracting Member State without the need for a declaration of enforceability;
(vi) bi moral biti v sporazumu opredeljen odnos med sporazumom in Uredbo (ES) št. 44/2001
(vi) the relationship between the Agreement and Regulation (EC) No 44/2001
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in trgovinskih zadevah (Bruselj I). ;
Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (Brussels I) should be clarified in the Agreement;
Materialno pravo
Substantive law
Poročevalec meni, da lahko učinkovit sistem patentov v Evropi precej prispeva k rasti prek inovacij.
The rapporteur is of the view that an efficient patent system in Europe can majorly contribute to achieving growth through innovation.
Evropska podjetja, zlasti mala in srednja, potrebujejo taka sredstva za spopadanje s trenutno gospodarsko krizo in ohranitev konkurenčnosti v svetovnem merilu.
European businesses, in particular SMEs, need such tools to face the current economic crisis and remain globally competitive.
Obstoječi patentni sistem v Evropi predvideva nacionalne patente, ki jih podeljujejo uradi za industrijsko lastnino držav članic, ali evropski patent, ki ga podeli Evropski patentni urad.
The existing patent system in Europe provides for national patents granted by Member States’ industrial property offices or for a European patent granted by the European Patent Office (EPO).
Ko urad podeli evropski patent, se ta razdeli na številne nacionalne patente, za katere velja nacionalna zakonodaja.
When a patent is granted, the European patent splits it into a bundle of national patents, covered by national legislation.
Ta sistem je zelo drag in zanj se uporablja drago in tvegano reševanje sporov pred različnimi institucijami, ki pogosto privede do nasprotujočih si sodb.
This system is very costly and is subject to very expensive and risky multi-forum litigation, often resulting in contradictory judgments.
Predlogi glede enotne patentne zaščite in jezikovne ureditve, ki so trenutno pod drobnogledom Parlamenta in Sveta, nameravajo ta razdrobljeni patentni sistem odpraviti.
The proposals regarding the unitary patent protection and the language regime, currently under the legislative scrutiny of the Parliament and the Council, intend to do away with the existing fragmented patent system.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da je predvideno oblikovanje enotnega patentnega varstva neločljivo povezano z ustanovitvijo enotnega patentnega sodišča.
The rapporteur is convinced that the envisaged creation of a unitary patent protection is inseparably linked to the establishment of a unified patent court.
Zdi se primerno, da Parlament kot sozakonodajalec pri obeh zakonodajnih predlogih izrazi svoja stališča o predvidenem sporazumu.
It seems appropriate that the Parliament as co-legislator on the two legislative proposals should express its views on the envisaged agreement.
Poročevalec zelo odobrava prizadevanja Sveta za vzpostavitev enotnega sistema reševanja patentnih sporov med sodelujočimi državami članicami.
The rapporteur strongly welcomes the efforts undertaken by the Council to create a unified patent litigation system between the participating Member States.
Vzpostavitev sodišča z mednarodnim sporazumom je – zlasti ob upoštevanju Mnenja št. 1/09 Sodišča EU – izvedljiv in obetaven način oblikovanja doslednega sistema reševanja patentnih sporov.
The creation of the Court by international agreement is - particularly in light of the Opinion 1/09 of the Court of Justice - a viable and promising way to establish a coherent patent litigation system.
Spoštovanje primarnosti prava Skupnosti in njegovo ustrezno uporabo na sodišču bi bilo treba zagotoviti s tem, da se predvidi možnost predhodnega odločanja na podlagi člena 267 PDEU in postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev v skladu s členi 258, 259 in 260 PDEU, ter s pojasnilom, da bi morale biti države pogodbenice odgovorne za morebitno škodo zaradi kršitev prava Unije na sodišču.
The respect of the primacy and proper application of Union law by the Court should be ensured by providing for the possibility of preliminary rulings pursuant to Article 267 of the TFEU, infringement proceedings in accordance with Articles 258, 259 and 260 of the TFEU and by clarifying that the Contracting Member States should be liable for damages caused as a result of breaches of Union law by the Court.
Poleg tega bi bil predlagani sistem umeščen v pravosodni sistem Unije, saj so lahko pogodbenice samo države članice EU.
Furthermore, the proposed system would be situated within the judicial system of the Union, since Contracting Member States may only be EU Member States.
Z opiranjem na obstoječi ustroj sistema patentnih sodišč držav pogodbenic je mogoče doseči karseda kakovostne in učinkovite postopke.
By relying on the existing structures of the patent court system of the Contracting Member States, a maximum of both quality and efficiency of proceedings can be achieved.
Enotno patentno sodišče bo pomagalo tudi občutno zmanjšati stroške reševanja sporov, ker jih strankam ne bo treba vzporedno reševati v različnih državah.
The Unified Patent Court will also help to cut drastically the litigation costs because parties will no longer have to litigate in parallel in different countries.
Študije kažejo, da bi predlagani sistem reševanja sporov evropskim podjetjem prinesel precejšnje prihranke.
Studies show that the proposed litigation system would allow for substantial savings for European businesses.
Pri odločanju o sestavi sodišča in potrebni usposobljenosti sodnikov je treba upoštevati tudi osrednja cilja glede kakovosti in učinkovitosti.
The overriding objectives of quality and efficiency also have to be taken into account when considering the composition of the court and the necessary qualification of the judges.
Zaželeno je oblikovanje večnacionalnih senatov, če je le poskrbljeno za standarda učinkovitosti in kakovosti.
The creation of multinational panels is desirable, as far as the standards of efficiency and quality are ensured.