natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da izvajanje kohezijske politike tudi po letu 2013 ponuja ustrezen odgovor na te nove izzive, da se morajo te politike uporabljati na različne načine po celotnem ozemlju Unije; meni, da mora kohezijska politika ostati politika Skupnosti v skladu s Pogodbo in načelom solidarnosti ter zato zavrača vse poskuse ponovne nacionalizacije te politike;
Takes the view that retaining cohesion policy after 2013 is an appropriate response to these new challenges, that this policy must be applied in a differentiated way to the whole of the Union's territory; takes the view that cohesion policy should remain a Community policy in accordance with the Treaty and the solidarity principle, and rejects, therefore all attempts to renationalise this policy;
meni, da je treba v prihodnosti dodatno okrepiti kohezijsko politiko in bolj poudariti njeno dodano vrednost; zato poziva, da se ji na ravni Skupnosti dodelijo zadostna finančna sredstva; zahteva, da se revizija finančnega okvira izkoristi kot priložnost za določitev proračunskih sredstev, ki so potrebna za odzivanje na vse izzive kohezijske politike Unije;
Takes the view that cohesion policy needs to be further reinforced in the future, and that its added value should be more strongly highlighted; calls, therefore, for sufficient financial resources to be allocated to cohesion policy at Community level; calls for the revision of the financial framework to be used as an opportunity to define the budgetary resources needed to meet all of the Union's cohesion policy challenges;
ob upoštevanju Teritorialne agende EU (Teritorialna agenda) in Leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih (Leipziška listina), ki sta bili sprejeti na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, odgovornega za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj mest, v Leipzigu dne 24. in 25. maja 2007, pa tudi Prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje Teritorialne agende Evropske unije, sprejetega na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, odgovornega za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj mest, v Ponti Delgadi (Azori) dne 23. in 24. novembra 2007 (Prvi akcijski program),
having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU ('the Territorial Agenda') and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities ('the Leipzig Charter'), which were both adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and urban development held in Leipzig on 24 and 25 May 2007, and the First Action Programme for the Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union, adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and development held in Ponta Delgada (Azores) on 23 and 24 November 2007 ('the First Action Programme'),
ob upoštevanju Četrtega poročila o gospodarski in socialni koheziji ( KOM(2007)0273 ) (Četrto kohezijsko poročilo),
having regard to the Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion ( COM(2007)0273 ) ('the Fourth Cohesion Report'),
ob upoštevanju evropske perspektive prostorskega razvoja, sprejete na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, odgovornega za prostorsko načrtovanje, v Potsdamu dne 11. maja 1999,
having regard to the European Spatial Development Perspective, adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning held in Potsdam on 11 May 1999,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov programa evropskega omrežja za opazovanje prostorskega razvoja (ESPON) 2006,
having regard to the results of the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) 2006 Programme,
ob upoštevanju predloga programa ESPON 2013,
having regard to the proposed ESPON 2013 Programme,
ob upoštevanju členov 158 in 159 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti,
having regard to Articles 158 and 159 of the Treaty establishing the European Community,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0028/2008 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0028/2008 ),
ker so ozemeljska raznolikost, policentrizem in kompaktna mesta bistvene strukturne lastnosti ozemlja Evropske unije,
whereas territorial diversity, polycentrism and compact cities are essential structural characteristics of the territory of the European Union,
ker živi večina državljank in državljanov Unije danes v mestih,
whereas the majority of Union citizens now live in cities,
ker sedanji izzivi, s katerimi se sooča prostorski razvoj v Evropski uniji, vključujejo podnebne spremembe, širjenje urbanih območij in razvoj površin, porabo energije, prometno infrastrukturo, demografske spremembe, vključno z odseljevanjem s podeželja in drugih regij v EU, vpliv širitve na socialno, gospodarsko in ozemeljsko kohezijo, ter neenake vplive globalizacije na ozemlje, vključno z vedno večjo vrzeljo med bogatimi in manj uspešnimi regijami, pa tudi neenakomeren razvoj mestnih in podeželskih območij, povezani s strukturnimi spremembami,
whereas the current challenges facing spactial development in the European Union include climate change, urban sprawl and land development, energy consumption, transport infrastructures, demographic change, including the depopulation of rural areas and other regions of the EU, the impact of enlargement on social, economic and territorial cohesion and the uneven regional effects of globalisation, including the widening gap between rich and less prosperous regions, as well as the unequal development of urban and rural areas combined with structural change;
ker cilji iz Teritorialne agende vključujejo razvoj uravnoteženega in policentričnega mestnega sistema ter novo partnerstvo med mestom in podeželjem, oblikovanje inovativnih regionalnih grozdov, zagotavljanje enakovrednega dostopa do infrastrukture in znanja, spodbujanje vseevropskega obvladovanja tveganja, trajnostnega razvoja, v prihodnost usmerjenega upravljanja ter varstva narave in kulturne dediščine,
whereas the objectives set out in the Territorial Agenda are the establishment of a polycentric, balanced urban system and the creation of a new urban-rural relationship, the formation of innovative regional clusters, ensuring parity of access to infrastructures and knowledge, the promotion of trans-European risk management, sustainable development, forward-looking management and conservation of the natural and cultural heritage,
ker cilji iz Leipziške listine v večji meri uporabljajo pristope integrirane politike razvoja mest z vzpostavljanjem in zagotavljanjem kakovostnih javnih prostorov, posodobitev infrastrukturnih omrežij in večanje energetske učinkovitosti, dejavno spodbujajo inovacije in izobraževanje ter – zlasti v zapostavljenih mestnih četrtih – spodbujajo okolju prijazen, zmogljiv in cenovno ugoden mestni prevoz, stabilnost strategij za izboljšanje okolja v mestih, krepitev lokalnega gospodarstva in lokalne politike trga delovne sile, dejavno politiko izobraževanja in usposabljanja za otroke in mladostnike,
whereas the objectives set out in the Leipzig Charter are making greater use of integrated urban development policy approaches by creating and ensuring high-quality public spaces, modernising infrastructure networks and improving energy efficiency, promoting proactive innovation and educational policies and – particularly in deprived neighbourhoods – promoting sustainable, efficient and affordable urban transport, pursuing strategies for upgrading the physical environment, strengthening the local economy and local labour market policy, and proactive education and training policies for children and young people,
ker je prostorsko načrtovanje ustrezen instrument za upravljanje uporabe površin in poselitvene strukture v državah članicah, njihovih regijah in mestih ter za opredelitev kakovosti življenja in razvojnih možnosti na kraju samem,
whereas spatial planning is the proper instrument for the guidance of land use and settlement structure in the Member States and their regions and cities, and for determining quality of life and development opportunities on the ground,
ker so poleg kohezijske politike kot instrumenta za strateško upravljanje potrebni dodatni ukrepi, da se dosežejo cilji Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine, zlasti ocenjevanje prostorske ustreznosti, celovit pristop ter nadziranje prostora,
whereas, in addition to cohesion policy as an instrument for strategic governance, other measures are needed to achieve the objectives of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter, particularly spatial impact assessments, the integrated approach and spatial planning observation,
ker ima poleg kohezijske politike velik vpliv na prostor tudi politika za razvoj podeželja, ker je integracija obeh politik pomanjkljiva in so zato potrebne boljše strategije, ki bodo razkrile dejanske razvojne možnosti in povečale privlačnost in konkurenčnost podeželja, kar bi pripomoglo k boju proti odseljevanju s podeželja,
whereas, in addition to cohesion policy, rural development policy has significant spatial impact; whereas there is insufficient integration of these two policy areas and therefore a need for enhanced synergies that will reveal real development potential and boost the attractiveness and competitiveness of rural areas, something which would help in combating rural depopulation,
ker kakovost javnih prostorov, naravna in kulturna krajina ter arhitektura pomembno vplivajo na življenjske pogoje mestnega in podeželskega prebivalstva ter so pomembni lokacijski dejavniki,
whereas the quality of public space and of the natural, cultural and architectural environment plays an important role in the quality of life of people living in urban and rural areas and are crucial "soft" location factors,
ker sta ustvarjalnost in inovativnost odločilni sredstvi pri prehodu h globalizirani družbi znanja; ker je zato uspešnost trajnostnega prostorskega razvoja in razvoja mest odvisna zlasti od razvoja potenciala ustvarjalnosti na kraju samem,
whereas creativity and innovation are crucial resources in the transition to a globalised knowledge society; whereas, therefore, the development of creativity potential on the ground is key to the success of sustainable spatial and urban planning,
ker je gradbena kultura (kultura visoko kakovostnega urbanega okolja), to je vsota kulturnih, gospodarskih, tehnoloških in ekoloških vidikov, ki vplivajo na kakovost ter postopek načrtovanja in gradnje, ključen sestavni del celostnega razvoja mest,
whereas "Baukultur" (the culture of a high quality built environment), that is to say the sum of cultural, economic, technological and environmental aspects influencing the quality and process of planning and building, is an essential component of integrated urban development,
ker celostni pristop pomeni, da bi morali razviti projekti predstavljati usklajen dolgoročen načrt, ki vsebuje gospodarsko, socialno in okoljsko razsežnost ter popolnoma vključuje ključne partnerje v načrtovanje, izvajanje in ocenjevanje programov razvoja mest,
whereas the integrated approach implies that the projects developed should constitute a coherent long-term plan incorporating the economic, social and environmental dimensions and fully involving key partners in the planning, execution and evaluation of urban development programmes;
ker celostni pristop k ozemeljski razsežnosti kohezije ne vključuje le ukrepov in politik o načrtovanju rabe zemljišč in razvoju mest, ker je končni cilj zagotoviti ravnovesje med državljani Unije ne glede na to, kje živijo, kar je cilj, ki ga ni mogoče doseči le z načrtovanjem rabe zemljišč,
whereas an integrated approach to the territorial dimension of cohesion does not consist only of land planning and urban development actions and policies, because the ultimate objective is to ensure a balance between Union citizens wherever they live, an aim which cannot be achieved solely through land planning,
meni, da je cilje Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine mogoče doseči le, če se izvaja obsežno zastavljena, medsektorska in celostna razvojna strategija, s katero se uresničuje celosten pristop;
Considers that the objectives of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter can only be achieved by pursuing a comprehensive, cross-sector, holistic development strategy to put the integrated approach into practice;
v zvezi z vmesnim pregledom kohezijske politike in ob upoštevanju kohezijske politike po letu 2013 predlaga, da bi moralo biti izvajanje celovitega pristopa obvezen pogoj za načrtovanje programa in izbiro projektov strukturnega sklada; zato poziva nosilce odločanja, da se prostovoljno zavežejo k izvajanju novih metod sodelovanja;
Proposes, in the context of the mid-term review of cohesion policy, and with an eye to post-2013 cohesion policy, that the implementation of an integrated approach should be a binding requirement for programme planning and project selection under the Structural Funds; to that end, calls on decision-makers to undertake voluntarily to implement new cooperation methods;
pozdravlja sklep evropskih ministrov za razvoj mest, ki so ga sprejeli na neuradnem srečanju v Leipzigu dne 24. in 25. maja 2007, da se ustanovi medvladna delovna skupina, ki ji bo predsedovala Nemčija ter bo namenjena določitvi in pojasnjevanju različnih vprašanj v zvezi z izvajanjem pobude JESSICA;
Welcomes the decision of the EU ministers responsible for urban development, taken at their informal meeting in Leipzig on 24 and 25 May 2007, to set up an intergovernmental working party, chaired by Germany, to identify and elucidate various issues relating to the implementation of the JESSICA initiative;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja vzpostavitev medslužbene delovne skupine Komisije, ki oblikuje predloge za izvajanje celostnega pristopa, in Komisijo poziva, naj tesno sodeluje z vsemi socialnimi, okoljskimi in gospodarskimi partnerji ter naj zagotovi njihovo vključenost v vseh odločitvah v zvezi z ozemeljsko kohezijo; poziva Komisijo k obveščanju Parlamenta o poteku teh del;
Welcomes the creation of a Commission inter-service group dealing with suggestions for the implementation of the integrated approach and calls on the Commission to work in close cooperation with all social, environmental and economic partners and to ensure their involvement in all decisions relating to territorial cohesion; asks the Commission to keep Parliament informed about the progress of this work;
poziva, da se pri oblikovanju kohezijske politike po letu 2013 upoštevajo zlasti prostorske posebnosti in potrebe ter posebno obravnavanje regij, ki temelji na teh dejavnikih; priporoča, da se uporabijo orodja za načrtovanje, usmerjeno v izvajanje, kakor je navedeno v Leipziški listini, ki temeljijo na raziskavah in stalnem spremljanju;
Calls for particular attention to be paid, in the shaping of post-2013 cohesion policy, to spatial characteristics and needs and to region-specific treatment based on these factors; recommends the use of implementation-oriented planning tools, as mentioned in the Leipzig Chapter, based on research and permanent monitoring;
poziva Komisijo in Svet v okviru vmesnega pregleda kohezijske politike, da za razvoj celotnega ozemlja bolje izkoristita sinergije z Evropskim kmetijskim skladom za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP); ob upoštevanju kohezijske politike po letu 2013 priporoča tesno povezanost med kohezijsko politiko in politiko za razvoj podeželja, da se povečajo možnosti za bolj kakovostno življenje na podeželju;
Calls on the Commission and Council, in the context of the mid-term review of cohesion policy, to make better use of synergies with the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development for the development of the territory as a whole; recommends, with an eye to post-2013 cohesion policy, close coordination between cohesion policy and rural development policy, in order to enhance the opportunities for improving the quality of life in rural areas;
opozarja, da zmožnost inovacij ni značilna samo za velemestne regije, ampak da lahko k uresničevanju ciljev lizbonske strategije znatno prispevajo tudi nekateri relativno oddaljeni in podeželski predeli; poziva Komisijo, naj se bolj osredotoči na dejavnike uspeha teh predelov, da na podlagi tega pripravi razvojni model za majhna in srednje velika mesta na podeželju;
Notes that it is not only metropolitan regions that have innovation potential, and that some relatively remote and rural areas are in the forefront of achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy; urges the Commission to look more closely at the success factors of these areas with a view to creating a development model for small and medium-sized towns in rural areas;
poudarja, da so partnerstva in delitev funkcij med urbanimi območji in podeželjem pomembni za uravnotežen in trajnostni razvoj celotnega ozemlja; poziva mestne in podeželske oblasti, naj v sodelovanju z vsemi javnimi in zasebnimi interesnimi skupinami določi skupna sredstva in pripravi skupne regionalne in podregionalne razvojne strategije, da zagotovijo boljše življenjske pogoje in kakovost življenja za vse državljanke in državljane Unije; poziva prihodnja predsedstva, naj organizirajo neuradna srečanja ministrov za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj mest, da rešijo ta vprašanja;
Stresses the importance of partnership and of the sharing of functions between urban and rural areas for the balanced and sustainable development of the territory as a whole; calls on urban and rural authorities in cooperation with all public and private stakeholders to identify their common assets and produce joint regional and sub-regional development strategies in order to secure better living conditions and quality of life for all citizens of the Union; calls on the forthcoming presidencies to hold informal meetings of the ministers responsible for territorial planning and urban development to address these issues;
v okviru revizije splošnega proračuna Evropske unije poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj upoštevata Teritorialno agendo in Leipziško listino ter izvedeta kakovostne prilagoditve, ki omogočajo, da se cilji ozemeljske kohezije v politiki EU bolj upoštevajo; meni, da je treba za uresničitev tega v naslednjih nekaj letih sprejeti zakonodajne ukrepe;
Calls on the Commission and Council to take the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter into account in their review of the general budget of the European Union, and to make qualitative adjustments to enable territorial cohesion targets to be incorporated more effectively into EU policies; considers that legislative measures need to be taken in the next few years to achieve this;
poziva Svet, da pri pregledu lizbonske in göteborške strategije (trajnostna razvojna strategija) na pomladnem vrhovnem zasedanju leta 2008 vprašanja o ozemlju in mestih opredeli kot cilj;
Calls on the Council, on reviewing the Lisbon and Göteborg strategies (sustainable development strategy) at the 2008 Spring summit, to define territorial and urban policy interests as objectives;
poziva države članice k hitremu ukrepanju za izpolnjevanje ciljev Teritorialne agende in izvajanje Leipziške listine;
Urges the Member States to take swift action to achieve the goals of the Territorial Agenda and implement the Leipzig Charter;
na podlagi upravljanja na več ravneh, ki upošteva ozemeljsko raznolikost Evropske unije in spoštuje načelo subsidiarnosti, poziva Svet in države članice, naj v celoti vključijo regionalne in lokalne oblasti, vključno s čezmejnimi javnimi oblastmi, ter pri doseganju načela partnerstva v akcijske programe za izvajanje Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine vključijo gospodarske in socialne partnerje, zadevne nevladne organizacije ter zasebne interesne skupine, ter to prizadevanje dejavno podpira; poudarja, da morajo potrebo po skupnem delovanju vsi vključeni akterji obravnavati kot pozitivno, saj je dokazano, da je usklajeno sodelovanje učinkovito;
Calls on the Council and the Member States, in a spirit of true multi-level governance that both takes account of the territorial diversity of the European Union and respects the subsidiarity principle, to fully involve local and regional governments, including cross-border public authorities, and, in pursuit of the partnership principle, to involve the economic and social partners, relevant NGOs and private stakeholders in the action programmes for implementing the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter, and gives its wholehearted support to these efforts; stresses that this need to work together should be regarded positively by all actors involved, as it has been proved that coherent collaboration is effective;
opozarja, da je dostop do informacijske in komunikacijske tehnologije ključen za prihodnje razvojne možnosti regij, in zato priporoča, kakor je navedeno v Teritorialni agendi, da se infrastruktura, kot so širokopasovni kabli, združi z novimi prometnimi in komunikacijskimi programi;
Recalls the key role that access to information and communication technologies plays for the future development prospects of the regions, and thus recommends, as mentioned in the Territorial Agenda, integrating infrastructure such as broadband cables into new transport and communication programmes;
poziva Komisijo, naj po dogovoru z državami članicami v okviru vrste ukrepa 2 prvega akcijskega programa izvede sistematično analizo ustreznih ključnih politik EU, pa tudi prostorsko presojo vpliva nove zakonodaje; v zvezi s tem opozarja na potencial metod za ocenjevanje, ki jih je razvil ESPON;
Calls on the Commission to undertake a systematic analysis of the territorial impact of relevant key EU policies, as agreed by the Member States under line of action 2 of the First Action Programme, and also to undertake a spatial impact assessment of relevant new legislation; points in this connection, to the potential of the evaluation methods developed by ESPON;
priznava, da so visoko kakovostno predšolsko in šolsko izobraževanje, vseživljenjsko učenje, univerze in drugi raziskovalni inštituti bistveni za prihodnji razvoj mest in regij;
Acknowledges that high quality pre-school and school education, lifelong learning, universities and other research institutes are fundamental for the future development of cities and regions;
opozarja, da je Natura 2000 pomemben instrument za evropski prostorski razvoj; podpira popolno izvajanje zahtev Nature 2000 ter oblikovanje krajinskih koridorjev in omrežij odprtega prostora med zavarovanimi območji, da se rastline lahko širijo, živali pa svobodno gibljejo ter se tako ohrani biološka raznovrstnost;
Recalls that Natura 2000 is an important instrument for European spatial development; insists that the requirements of Natura 2000 be fully implemented and that landscape corridors and open space networks between protected areas be created so that flora can disperse and fauna can move freely, thus preserving biodiversity;
poziva, naj se politika o ustvarjalnosti v gospodarskih sektorjih vključi v prostorski razvoj in razvoj mest, da se s pomočjo razpoložljivih instrumentov (kohezijska politika, prostorsko in urbanistično načrtovanje) in ob upoštevanju kakovosti prostora oblikuje okvir za izboljšanje možnosti za ustvarjalno in inovativno delovanje;
Calls for a policy on creative economic sectors to be incorporated into spatial and urban development with the aim of creating a framework, using the instruments available (cohesion policy, spatial and urban planning) and taking into account the quality of space, for improving opportunities for creative and innovative action;
meni, da je treba z vidika demografskega razvoja nujno izboljšati sposobnost mest in regij, da se prilagodijo, pri čemer je treba poudariti samostojen razvoj in krepitev prostovoljnega dela;
Considers it necessary, in the light of demographic trends, to improve the adaptability of cities and regions, prioritising self-development and the promotion of voluntary work;