natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
27. poziva Komisijo, naj ob upoštevanju sedanjega pregleda objavi praktičen in jasen priročnik za naročnike, ki bo zajemal študije o uspešnem javnem naročanju na socialnem področju;
Calls on the Commission in light of the ongoing review to publish a practical and clear user manual for contracting authorities which includes case studies of where social procurement has been successful;
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Frédéric Daerden, Karima Delli, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Stephen Hughes, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Patrick Le Hyaric, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck
Regina Bastos, Edit Bauer, Pervenche Berès, Mara Bizzotto, Philippe Boulland, David Casa, Alejandro Cercas, Ole Christensen, Derek Roland Clark, Sergio Gaetano Cofferati, Frédéric Daerden, Karima Delli, Proinsias De Rossa, Frank Engel, Sari Essayah, Ilda Figueiredo, Thomas Händel, Roger Helmer, Nadja Hirsch, Stephen Hughes, Danuta Jazłowiecka, Martin Kastler, Ádám Kósa, Jean Lambert, Patrick Le Hyaric, Olle Ludvigsson, Elizabeth Lynne, Thomas Mann, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Csaba Őry, Siiri Oviir, Rovana Plumb, Sylvana Rapti, Licia Ronzulli, Elisabeth Schroedter, Joanna Katarzyna Skrzydlewska, Jutta Steinruck
4. vztraja, da morajo direktive naročnike spodbujati in jim izrecno dovoljevati, da se pri vsebini razpisov sklicujejo na horizontalne cilje politik, kot so merila trajnostnega razvoja;
Maintains that the Directives should encourage and explicitly allow contracting authorities to refer to horizontal policy objectives, such as sustainable development criteria, in the subject matters of tenders;
– uvedejo okoljske pogoje v tehnične specifikacije in v fazi dodelitve upoštevajo okoljski vpliv,
– impose environmental conditions in the technical specifications and take account of environmental impact at the award stage,
– uveljavijo socialne standarde, na primer za spodbujanje vključevanja invalidov na trg dela, in standarde za varnost pri delu,
– impose social standards, for example in order to promote the integration of people with disabilities into the labour market, and safety at work standards,
– uveljavijo pogoje glede dobrega počutja rejnih živali, in kjer je to ustrezno tudi glede prevoza živih živali,
– impose welfare conditions for farm animals, as well as conditions for transport of live animals where relevant,
– zahtevajo, da morajo navedeni pogoji prav tako veljati za oddajo del podizvajalcem;
– stipulate that the above conditions must likewise apply to subcontracting;
8. se zavzema za spodbujanje in podpiranje trajnostnih javnih naročil pri javnih izvajalcih, ne pa za določanje obveznih kvot; še vedno meni, da največja ovira za okolju prijaznejša javna naročila ni toliko pomanjkanje pripravljenosti ali nezavedanje možnosti kot nejasna in toga zakonodaja;
Prefers to encourage and facilitate sustainable procurement by public operators rather than setting mandatory quotas; still considers that the greatest obstacle to more environmentally friendly public procurement is not so much a lack of willingness as unawareness of the possibilities and unclear and inflexible legislation;
11. trdno verjame, da je potrebna sprememba direktive za pojasnitev, da je zaželeno in tudi izvedljivo, da se vpliv predmeta naročila na okolje upošteva skozi celoten življenjski cikel, vključno s proizvodnjo in njenimi pogoji vse do porabe, glede na statistike o odpadkih, povezanih z dejavnostmi pred porabo; da bi naročniki imeli ustrezne informacije o uporabi okoljskih in/ali drugih trajnostnih vidikov, naj jim Komisija zagotovi tehnologijo za izračun stroškov življenjskega cikla;
Firmly believes that the directive should be amended to make it clearer that it is both possible and desirable to take account of the environmental impact of the subject of the contract throughout its entire life cycle, including the whole production process and its conditions all through to consumption, in view of the statistics on wastage associated to upstream activities; in order to provide contracting authorities with appropriate information concerning the application of environmental and/or other sustainable aspects, the Commission should provide them with a methodology to calculate life-cycle costs;
Odnosi s podjetji
Relations with business
18. poudarja, da je mogoče z javnimi naročili in subvencioniranjem okolju prijaznih logističnih rešitev zmanjšati število voženj, potrebo po prevozu z avtomobilom in emisije CO 2 ;
Stresses that it is possible, through public procurement and by subsidising environmentally friendly logistics solutions, to reduce the number of journeys, the need for transport by car, and CO 2 emissions;
20. poudarja povezavo med okolju prijaznimi naročili in spodbujanjem inovacij; poudarja, da je to še bolj očitno, kadar so pri dodeljevanju naročil okoljski pogoji v tehničnih specifikacijah povezani z dajanjem višjih točk ponudbam, ki izpolnjujejo najsodobnejše pogoje glede varovanja okolja in zelenih rešitev;
Stresses the link between environmentally friendly procurement and the promotion of innovations; stresses that this is even clearer when one combines environmental conditions in technical specifications with giving higher scores at the award stage to tenders which meet certain cutting-edge environmental conditions and green solutions;
24. meni, da bi morali merilo dodeljevanja po najnižji ceni uporabiti samo, kadar ga je mogoče utemeljiti s tem, da okoljske in/ali druge trajnostne zahteve pri tem posebnem primeru niso pomembne ali da so bili v tehničnih specifikacijah določeni strogi okoljski in/ali socialni pogoji; vendar opozarja, da mora za končno odločitev ostati odgovoren naročnik.
Considers that the ‘lowest price’ award criterion should only be used if it can be justified on the grounds that environmental and/or other sustainability requirements are irrelevant to this specific case, or that strict environmental and/or social conditions have been imposed in the technical specifications; notes, however, that responsibility for the final decision should remain with the contracting entity;
A. ker je učinkovit trg javnih naročil bistvenega pomena za spodbujanje enotnega trga, inovacij, visoke ravni varovanja okolja in podnebja ter tudi socialne vključenosti po vsej EU in za doseganje optimalne vrednosti za javne organe, državljane, podjetja in davkoplačevalce;
A. whereas a well functioning procurement market is of essential importance in order to foster the single market, stimulate innovation, promote a high level of environmental and climate protection, as well as social inclusion, throughout the EU and achieve optimal value for public authorities, citizens, business and taxpayers,
3. meni, da bi moral biti cilj tega pregleda vrnitev k prvotnemu namenu javnih naročil, torej zagotavljanje učinkovite porabe sredstev v državah članicah in konkurence na trgu, s čimer bi dosegli optimalne rezultate; meni, da bi morala veljati bolj jasna, preprosta, prilagodljiva in pregledna merila, s čimer bi mala in srednja podjetja spodbujali k prijavi na razpise za javna naročila; Komisijo pa poziva, naj preuči možnosti za okrepitev dialoga med javnimi naročniki in potencialnimi ponudniki, tako da bi ga vključila v postopek javnih naročil;
Notes that the objective of this revision should be to return to the original purpose of public procurement, i.e. ensuring effective use of funds by the Member States and competition in the market, in order to achieve optimum results; believes that criteria should be applied which are clearer, simpler and more flexible and transparent, in order to encourage SMEs to participate in public procurement; calls, furthermore, on the Commission to explore options for strengthening the dialogue between public procurers and potential bidders, thus making this part of the procurement process;
5. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne ukrepe in med drugim uvedejo posebne predpise v prihodnji direktivi o javnih naročilih, s katerimi bi zagotovile, da bo vsaj 50 % postopkov javnih naročil, ki jih izvedejo institucije EU in države članice, opravljenih po elektronski poti, skladno z zavezo, ki so jo vlade držav članic leta 2005 sprejele na ministrski konferenci o e-upravi v Manchestru;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary measures, including the introduction of specific provisions in the future public procurement directive, to ensure that at least 50% of both the EU institutions’ and the Member States’ public procurement operations are carried out electronically, in line with the commitment made by the Member State governments at the ministerial conference on e-government in Manchester in 2005;
7. ugotavlja, da je večina javnih naročil dodeljena podjetjem iz države članice, iz katere tudi prihaja naročnik, in poziva k vzpostavitvi resničnega trga javnih naročil na ravni EU;
Notes that the majority of public contracts are granted to companies from the same Member States as the contracting authorities, and calls for the establishment of a truly EU-wide public procurement market;
Komisijo tudi poziva, naj izvede raziskavo v vseh 27 državah članicah, s katero bo ocenila stopnjo čezmejnih ponudb in na podlagi tega ovrednotila primernost trenutnih pragov ter jih morebiti zvišala, s čimer bi čezmejne ponudbe postale bolj zanimive;
Urges the Commission, furthermore, to conduct a survey across the 27 Member States to assess the rate of cross-border bids, with a view to evaluating the pertinence of current thresholds and potentially raising them to make cross-border bidding more attractive;
11. ugotavlja, da bi lahko z uvedbo zahtev za inovacije ali preveč podrobnih tehničnih specifikacij, na primer energetske učinkovitosti predmeta javnega naročila, omejili konkurenco in možnost izbire naročnikov;
Notes that introducing mandatory prescriptions for innovation, or excessively detailed technical specifications on, for example, the energy performance of the subject of a public contract, carries the risk of restricting competition and limiting choice for contracting authorities;
13. meni, da bi morala prihodnja zakonodaja EU o javnem naročanju okrepiti veljavne določbe o obvezni uporabi merila energetske učinkovitosti pri dodeljevanju javnih naročil, ne da bi s tem ovirali pravila svobodne konkurence; poudarja, da bo takšen pristop spodbudil inovacije in diverzifikacijo ponudbe na trgu;
Believes that future EU public procurement legislation should reinforce existing provisions which require the mandatory use of energy efficiency criteria when deciding on the award of a public contract, without hampering the rules on free competition; insists that such an approach will stimulate innovation and the diversification of supply;
17. pozdravlja pobudo nekaterih držav članic za podpiranje inovacij v predkomercialnih naročilih za pogodbe o razvoju rešitev za posebne izzive, s katerimi se soočajo javne službe; ugotavlja, da lahko pretirane zahteve in tehnični predpisi v postopku javnega naročanja vodijo v pretirano birokracijo in tako ovirajo inovativnost; meni, da bi moralo biti javno naročanje namesto tega osredotočeno na delovanje in končne rezultate;
Welcomes the initiative taken by some Member States to support innovation through pre‑commercial procurement, where contracts are offered that develop solutions to specific challenges identified by public services; notes that excessive demands and technical prescriptions in the public procurement process may produce excessive administration, thus hampering innovation; believes public procurement should focus instead on function and end results;
2. meni, da bi morala Komisija za uskladitev pravnega okvira javnega naročanja državam članicam predlagati enoten in standardiziran model;
Takes the view that in order to harmonise the legal framework on public procurement, the Commission needs to propose to the Member States a single standardised model;
7. meni, da je bistveno oblikovati orodja za povečanje čezmejnega sodelovanja na ravni javnih naročil in pri tem malim in srednjim podjetjem omogočiti ustrezen dostop do čezmejnih postopkov, da bi pripomogli k izboljšanju stopnje zaposlenost in na primer povečali učinkovitost porabe pri izvajanju programov, ki se financirajo z instrumenti kohezijske politike; meni, da je v okviru čezmejnih javnih naročil treba tudi pojasniti vidike prava intelektualne lastnine;
Considers it essential to create tools to increase cross-border cooperation at the level of public procurement, on a basis of appropriate access for SMEs to cross-border procedures with a view to maintaining employment levels and so as, for example, to increase spending efficiency in the implementation of programmes funded by cohesion policy instruments; believes that in the context of cross-border public procurement it is also necessary to clarify the aspects relating to intellectual property law;
12. meni, da so javno-zasebna partnerstva izredno pomembna, da lahko Evropska unija na specifičnih področjih izpelje potrebne naložbe; poziva Komisijo, naj uvede ukrepe, potrebne za premostitev ovir, ter naj na podlagi predpisov za javna naročila in strukturne sklade ustvari skladen okvir za uporabo javno-zasebnih partnerstev; priporoča državam članicam, naj svoje pravne predpise oblikujejo prožneje ter zagotovijo skladnost zakonskih določb tako, da bodo javno-zasebna partnerstva učinkoviteje zasnovana;
Believes that public-private partnerships (PPPs) are vital if the EU is to make the necessary investments in certain fields; calls on the Commission to take all necessary steps to remove the obstacles and establish a consistent framework for the use of PPPs, on the basis of rules that can apply to both public procurement procedures and the Structural Funds; recommends that the Member States introduce greater flexibility into their legislative framework and ensure consistency of legislation, so that PPPs can operate with maximum efficiency;
15. poziva Komisijo, naj poenostavi postopkovni okvir v celoti in se izogne izjemam in odstopanjem, ki jih lahko uporabijo pogodbeni organi, ter pojasni negotovosti, ki so jih ti izrazili glede dodelitev pod mejnim pragom iz direktiv, zlasti z zagotavljanjem nadaljnjih smernic, ki jim bodo pomagale oceniti, ali v posebnih primerih obstaja čezmejni interes ali ne; meni, da je v zvezi z javnimi naročili in prizadevanji za najboljše rezultate treba vzpostaviti ravnovesje med željo po poenostavitvi postopkov ter potrebo po zagotovitvi lojalne konkurence; meni, da je treba zvišati mejne vrednosti za javne pogodbe o izvajanju storitev in dobavi;
Asks the Commission to simplify the procedural framework as a whole by avoiding exceptions and derogations to be applied by contracting authorities and to clarify the uncertainties expressed by the latter on awards below the thresholds of the directives, especially by providing further guidance to help contracting authorities in assessing the existence or not of a certain cross-border interest in specific cases; believes it is necessary to strike a balance between the desire to simplify procedures and the need to ensure fair competition in public contracts and obtain the best possible results; takes the view that the threshold values for public service and supply contracts should be raised;
18. ugotavlja, da javni pogodbeni organi zaradi zapletenosti ne uporabljajo dovolj konkurenčnega dialoga ter dinamičnih sistemov naročanja, zato poziva Komisijo, naj preveri, kako bi lahko spodbudila uporabo teh postopkov v praksi in v kolikšni meri bi lahko postopek dialoga uporabili tudi za redne postopke naročanja, ne le za zelo zapletena naročila;
Notes that public contracting authorities make insufficient use of the competitive dialogue and dynamic purchasing systems because of the complexity involved, and consequently calls on the Commission to examine to what extent these types of procedure could be made more pragmatic and to what extent the dialogue procedure could be used not only for particularly complex contracts but also for regular procurement procedures;
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Haralampos Angurakis (Charalampos Angourakis), Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Elie Hoarau, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Mojca Kleva, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Franz Obermayr, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Mihailis Tremopulos (Michail Tremopoulos), Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
François Alfonsi, Luís Paulo Alves, Charalampos Angourakis, Catherine Bearder, Victor Boştinaru, Zuzana Brzobohatá, John Bufton, Alain Cadec, Francesco De Angelis, Tamás Deutsch, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Elie Hoarau, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Juozas Imbrasas, María Irigoyen Pérez, Seán Kelly, Mojca Kleva, Petru Constantin Luhan, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Riikka Manner, Iosif Matula, Erminia Mazzoni, Miroslav Mikolášik, Lambert van Nistelrooij, Franz Obermayr, Jan Olbrycht, Markus Pieper, Monika Smolková, Georgios Stavrakakis, Nuno Teixeira, Michael Theurer, Michail Tremopoulos, Oldřich Vlasák, Kerstin Westphal, Hermann Winkler, Joachim Zeller
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odobritvi jamstva EU Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri posojilih in jamstvih za posojila za projekte zunaj Unije in o razveljavitvi Sklepa št. 633/2009/ES
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and loan guarantees for projects outside the Union and repealing Decision No 633/2009/EC
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta iz prve obravnave (12443/1/2011 – C7‑0270/2011 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (12443/1/2011 – C7-0270/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za proračun ( A7-0327/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0327/2011 ),
Evropska investicijska bank (EIB), katere delničarke so države članice, je eden najpomembnejših finančnih instrumentov EU.
The European Investment Bank (EIB), whose shareholders are the Member states, is one of the most important EU financial instruments.
Posojila zunaj EU (9 milijard EUR) predstavljajo več kot 12 % vseh njenih posojil v letu 2010.
Its lending outside the EU (EUR 9bln) represented above 12% of its total 2010 lending.
O zunanjem mandatu EIB, to je proračunskem jamstvu EU za kritje državnih in političnih tveganj v zvezi s posojili in jamstvi za posojila EIB zunaj EU, od sprejetja Sklepa 633/2009/ES z dne 13. julija 2009, potem ko je Evropski parlament
The external mandate of the EIB, i.e. the EU budgetary guarantee covering sovereign and political risks of EIB loan and loan guarantee operations outside the EU, is codecided between Parliament and Council since Decision 633/2009/EC of 13 July 2009, following a challenge of the legal basis by the European Parliament (EP)
Jamstveni sklad ščiti proračun EU pred šoki, do katerih bi prišlo zaradi neplačila posojil, za katera jamči EU.
A Guarantee Fund protects the EU budget from shocks that might otherwise occur in case of defaults on loans that are guaranteed by the EU.
Trenutno se 9 % celotnega neporavnanega zneska odobrenih posojil plačuje v sklad iz proračuna.
Currently, 9% of the total outstanding amount of loans granted is paid into the Fund from the budget.
Oblikovanje rezervacij sklada poteka v letu N+2 po izplačilu posojila. spodbijal pravno podlago, soodločata Parlament in Svet.
The provisioning of the Fund occurs in year N+2 of loan disbursement. .
Evropska komisija je 21. aprila 2010 Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu predložila predlog sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o odobritvi jamstva EU Evropski investicijski banki za izgube pri posojilih in jamstvih za projekte zunaj EU
On 21 April 2010, the Commission submitted to the EP and the Council a proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under loans and guarantees for projects outside the European Union
Ta pregled je bil predstavljen v sporočilu Komisije
This review was presented in a Communication from the Commission
KOM(2010)0173 , SEC(2010)442. o zunanjem ocenjevanju, ki ga nadzoruje in vodi upravljalni odbor modrih oseb, ocenjevanju, ki ga izvede zunanji svetovalni organ
COM(2010)0173 , SEC(2010)442. which drew on an external evaluation supervised and managed by a Steering committee of wise persons, on an evaluation carried out by an external consultancy
Na ravni odbora je bilo na prvi obravnavi predlaganih več sprememb, vključno s kompromisi, ki izhajajo iz številnih neformalnih stikov in mnenj, prejetih od petih odborov.
At committee level, a number of amendments were tabled at first reading, including compromises which emerged from multiple informal contacts and opinions received from five committees.
Odbor za proračun je 27. januarja 2011 sprejel priporočilo k plenarnemu zasedanju, ki vsebuje globalni sporazumni predlog spremembe v obliki prečiščenega besedila.
On 27 January 2011 the committee on budgets (BUDG) adopted its recommendation to plenary incorporating a global compromise amendment in the form of a consolidated text.
Evropski parlament je na zasedanju 17. februarja 2011 v prvi obravnavi sprejel zakonodajno resolucijo
During its sitting of 17 February 2011 the EP adopted at first reading a legislative resolution
P7_TA-PROV(2011)0062 . , ki spreminja predlog Komisije.
P7_TA-PROV(2011)0062 . amending the Commission’s proposal.
Odbor za proračun je 3. marca 2011 pooblastil poročevalca, naj začne pogajanja s Svetom in Komisijo za sporazum v drugi obravnavi v skladu s skupno izjavo o praktičnih dogovorih za postopek soodločanja
On 3 March 2011, a mandate was given by BUDG to the rapporteur, to enter negotiations with Council and Commission with a view to a second reading agreement, in accordance with the Joint declaration on practical arrangements for the codecision procedure
5. in s členom 70.
5. and with Rule 70.
Med Evropskim parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo so potekali številni neuradni trialogi (glej prilogo).
A number of informal trilogues took place between the EP, Council and Commission (see Annex).
EIB je bila povabljena, naj predstavi svoje pomisleke na ločenih srečanjih, in je prejemala redna poročila o napredovanju.
The EIB was invited to raise issues of concern in separate meetings, and regularly informed of progress made.
V tem okviru je bil 21. junija dosežen dogovor, ki sta ga potrdila Odbor za proračun s pismom njegovega predsednika z dne 27. junija 2011 in odbor COREPER 14. septembra 2011.
In this context, an agreement was reached on 21 June, which was confirmed by BUDG through a letter by its Chairman dated 27 June 2011, and by COREPER on 14 September 2011.
Svet je 20. septembra 2011 sprejel svoje stališče v prvi obravnavi v skladu s členom 294 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), ki vključuje sporazum.
On 20 September 2011, the Council adopted its position at first reading in accordance with Article 294 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), incorporating the agreement.
Predlog Komisije: cilj in bistveni elementi
The Commission's proposal: objective and main elements