natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Skupnost in države članice, naj vse določbe konvencije vključijo v zakonodajo, sprejmejo ukrepe in zagotovijo finančna sredstva, potrebna za njihovo izvajanje v določenih časovnih okvirih, ter določijo količinske cilje v zvezi s tem; spodbuja države članice, naj med seboj izmenjujejo informacije in najboljše prakse o izvajanju;
Calls on the Community and the Member States to incorporate all the provisions of the Convention into law, to take the measures and provide financial means necessary for their application within specific deadlines and to set quantitative objectives for this; encourages the Member States to exchange information and best practices on the implementation;
poziva države članice, naj uporabijo načelo enakosti med spoloma pri odločitvah o politikah in ukrepih v zvezi z invalidnimi ženskami in moškimi ter invalidnimi dekleti in fanti ter pri njihovem izvajanju na vseh področjih, zlasti v zvezi z vključevanjem na delovnem mestu, izobraževanjem in bojem proti diskriminaciji; prav tako poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo zakonodajo za zaščito pravic invalidnih žensk in deklet v primerih spolnih zlorab ter psihološkega in fizičnega nasilja v javnosti in v njihovem domačem okolju, ter naj podprejo okrevanje invalidnih žensk in deklet, ki so bile izpostavljene takšnemu nasilju;
Calls on the Member States to apply gender mainstreaming in decisions about policies and measures for women and men, girls and boys with disabilities and in their implementation in all areas, especially regarding integration in the workplace, education and anti-discrimination, and to introduce legislation to protect the rights of women and girls with disabilities in cases of sexual abuse and psychological and physical violence in public and within their home environments and to support the recovery of women and girls with disabilities who have been subjected to such violence;
poziva države članice in institucije Skupnosti, naj državljanom Unije in organizacijam invalidnih oseb zagotovijo prost dostop do informacij o njihovih pravicah v okviru konvencije in izbirnega protokola ter zagotovijo njihovo razširjanje, in sicer v obliki, ki je dostopna državljanom Unije;
Calls on the Member States and the Community institutions to ensure free access for citizens of the Union and for organisations of persons with disabilities to information about their rights under the Convention and the Optional Protocol, and to ensure dissemination of that information to such citizens and organisations in a form that is accessible to citizens;
poudarja, da je pomembno Komisiji dati na voljo vse potrebne finančne in človeške vire, kar ji bo omogočilo, da bo služila kot osrednja točka v zvezi z zadevami v pristojnosti Skupnosti, ki se nanašajo na izvajanje konvencije; poziva k določitvi postopka, ki bi omogočil zadosten pregled nad vsemi evropskimi in nacionalnimi politikami, ki vplivajo na izvajanje konvencije; zahteva od Komisije, naj Parlamentu in Svetu redno poroča o napredku pri izvajanju;
Underlines the importance of equipping the Commission with all the necessary financial and human resources to enable it to serve as a focal point in respect of matters falling within the Community's competence relating to the implementation of the Convention; calls for the establishment of a procedure that would enable an adequate overview of all European and national policies that have an impact on the implementation of the Convention; requests the Commission to regularly report to Parliament and the Council on the progress of the implementation;
poziva države članice, naj v skladu s svojimi sistemi organizacije določijo po eno ali več stičnih točk v okviru svojih vlad za zadeve v zvezi z nacionalnim izvajanjem konvencije in njenim nadzorom ter naj preučijo možnost vzpostavitve ali določitve usklajevalnega mehanizma v okviru vlad, ki bi olajšal dejavnosti v različnih sektorjih na različnih ravneh v skladu s členom 33(1) konvencije; zahteva, da se posebna pozornost nameni vzpostavitvi ustreznega neodvisnega nadzornega mehanizma v skladu s členom 33(2) konvencije in v skladu z načeli glede statusa nacionalnih institucij (pariška načela), kot so bila sprejeta v resoluciji Generalne skupščine ZN 48/134 z dne 20. decembra 1993;
Calls on the Member States, in accordance with their system of organisation, to designate one or more focal points within their respective governments for matters relating to the national implementation and monitoring of the Convention and to consider the establishment or designation of a coordination mechanism within the government to facilitate action in different sectors and at different levels, in accordance with Article 33(1) of the Convention; requests that special attention be paid to the establishment of an appropriate independent monitoring mechanism pursuant to Article 33(2) of the Convention and in accordance with the principles relating to the status of national institutions – the Paris Principles – as adopted in UN General Assembly resolution 48/134 of 20 December 1993;
poziva Skupnost in države članice, naj spodbujajo dobro usklajen socialni dialog med zainteresiranimi partnerji ter naj v nadzor in izvajanjem konvencije v skladu s členoma 4 in 33(2) konvencije dejavno vključijo organizacije invalidnih oseb;
Urges the Community and the Member States to promote a well coordinated social dialogue between the interested partners and to actively involve organisations of persons with disabilities in monitoring and implementing the Convention, pursuant to Articles 4 and 33(2) of the Convention;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. aprila 2009 o 25. letnem poročilu Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti (2007) ( 2008/2337(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 April 2009 on the 25th annual report from the Commission on monitoring the application of Community law (2007) ( 2008/2337(INI) )
ob upoštevanju 25. letnega poročila Komisije o spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti (2007) ( KOM(2008)0777 ),
having regard to the 25th annual report from the Commission on monitoring the application of Community law (2007) ( COM(2008)0777 ),
ob upoštevanju delovnih dokumentov služb Komisije ( SEK(2008)2854 in SEK(2008)2855 ),
having regard to the Commission staff working documents ( SEC(2008)2854 and SEC(2008)2855 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. septembra 2007 z naslovom "Evropa rezultatov - uporaba prava skupnosti" ( KOM(2007)0502 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 5 September 2007 entitled "A Europe of results – applying Community law" ( COM(2007)0502 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 20. marca 2002 o odnosih s pritožnikom v zvezi s kršitvami prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0141 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 20 March 2002 on relations with the complainant in respect of infringements of Community law ( COM(2002)0141 ),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o 23. letnem poročilu Komisije o nadzoru uporabe prava Skupnosti (2005) Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0060 .
having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on the Commission's 23rd annual report on monitoring the application of Community law (2005) Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0060 .
ob upoštevanju člena 45 in člena 112(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 45 and Rule 112(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve in mnenja Odbora za peticije ( A6-0245/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Petitions ( A6-0245/2009 ),
obžaluje, da v nasprotju z dosedanjo prakso Komisija ni odgovorila na vprašanja, ki jih je postavil Parlament v prejšnjih resolucijah, zlasti v zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji z dne 21. februarja 2008; ugotavlja pomanjkanje znatnih izboljšav glede treh temeljnih vprašanj, povezanih s preglednostjo, viri in trajanjem postopkov;
Regrets that, unlike in the past, the Commission has not responded in any way to the issues raised by Parliament in its previous resolutions, in particular the above-mentioned resolution of 21 February 2008; notes the lack of significant improvement with regard to the three fundamental issues of transparency, resources and the length of procedures;
naj nujno preveri možnost vzpostavitve sistema, ki bi ponudil jasen prikaz mehanizmov pritožb, ki so na voljo državljanom; da bi bil sistem v čim večjo pomoč državljanom, bi lahko imel obliko skupnega portala EU ali spletne točke "vse na enem mestu";
to investigate urgently the possibility of a system clearly signposting the various complaints mechanisms available to citizens, which could take the form of a common EU portal or the creation of an on-line one-stop-shop in order to assist citizens;
naj sprejme sporočilo, v katerem razloži načelo odgovornosti države za kršitve zakonodaje Skupnosti, vključno s kršitvami, ki jih je mogoče pripisati sodni veji, tako da bi državljani imeli možnost učinkoviteje prispevati k uporabi prava Skupnosti;
to adopt a communication setting out its interpretation of the principle of State liability for breach of Community law, including infringements attributable to the judicial branch, thus enabling citizens to contribute more effectively to the application of Community law;
zato poziva Komisijo:
Calls on the Commission, therefore:
naj upošteva zaveze, sprejete v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu z dne 20. marca 2002, da bodo vse njene odločitve glede kršitev objavljene Točka 12: Odločitve Komisije o primerih kršitve se objavijo v enem tednu od njihovega sprejetja na internetni stani generalnega sekretariata, katere naslov je: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/droit_com/index_en.htm#infractions.
to abide by the commitment made in its above-mentioned Communication of 20 March 2002 to publish all its infringement decisions Point 12: "Commission decisions on infringement cases are published within one week of their adoption on the Secretariat-General's Internet site at the following address: http://europa.eu.int/comm/secretariat_general/sgb/droit_com/index_en.htm#infractions.
Odločitve, da se poda obrazloženo mnenje ali da se zadevo preda v odločanje Sodišču Evropskih skupnosti, se prav tako objavijo v obliki sporočila za javnost, razen če Komisija ne odloči drugače.
Decisions to deliver a reasoned opinion to a Member State or to refer a case to the Court of Justice will also be publicised by means of a press release, unless the Commission decides otherwise."
, saj je objava njenih odločitev, začenši z registracijo pritožbe in vseh aktov, ki temu sledijo, nujno potreben instrument v boju proti politični samovolji pri ravnanju v primeru kršitev;
, given that the publication of those decisions, starting with the registration of a complaint and followed by all subsequent acts, is a vital tool with which to curb political interference in the management of infringements;
naj zagotovi Parlamentu, kot je ta že večkrat zahteval, jasne in izčrpne podatke o virih, namenjenih obravnavi primerov kršitve v različnih generalnih direktoratih;
to provide Parliament, as repeatedly requested, with clear, exhaustive data on the resources earmarked for the processing of infringement cases in the various Directorates-General;
naj razmisli o poenostavljenem in manj birokratskem postopku oblikovanja uradnih opominov državam članicam, ki ne izpolnjujejo obveznosti, ter s tem omogoči, da bi lahko hitro izkoristili ta učinkoviti ukrep;
to consider introducing a simplified, less bureaucratic procedure for the issuing of formal notice against a Member State which has failed to fulfil its obligations, in order to take swift advantage of the effectiveness of this measure;
Komisijo tudi prosi, naj odločno uporabi člen 228 Pogodbe ES, da zagotovi pravilno izvrševanje sodb, ki jih izreče Sodišče;
calls on the Commission, moreover, to apply Article 228 of the EC Treaty decisively, in order to ensure that judgments delivered by the Court of Justice are properly enforced;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija v skladu z napovedjo v zgoraj navedenem sporočilu z dne 5. septembra 2007 Točka 3: Komisija bo svoje ukrepanje glede teh prednostnih nalog po letu 2008 opisala in pojasnila v svojih letnih poročilih.
Notes that the Commission, as announced in its above-mentioned Communication of 5 September 2007 Point 3: "The Commission will describe and explain its action on these priorities in its annual reports, from 2008."
v zadevnem letnem poročilu predstavila prednostne ukrepe, ki jih namerava izvesti na nekaterih področjih ravnanja v primeru pritožb in kršitev; odobrava izjave, v skladu s katerimi "se bo [prednost] še naprej dajala problemom z obsežnim vplivom na temeljne pravice, prosto gibanje oseb" KOM(2008)0777 , str.
, has, in the annual report under review, described the priority actions it intends to pursue in certain areas of complaint and infringement management; welcomes the statements according to which priority will continue to be given to "problems having a wide-ranging impact on fundamental rights and free movement" COM(2008)0777 , p.
; poudarja pomen nujnih in odločnih ukrepov na teh področjih, saj so nasilna dejanja, povezana z rasizmom in ksenofobijo, v nekaterih državah članicah pogost pojav; prav tako odobrava prednost, ki se namenja kršitvam, pri katerih so državljani v velikem obsegu ali večkrat zaporedoma neposredno oškodovani ali izpostavljeni resnemu zmanjšanju kakovosti življenja" Isti dokument.
; stresses the importance of urgent and determined action in these fields, as acts of violence related to racism and xenophobia have become frequent in certain Member States; equally welcomes the priority given to "infringements where citizens are on a significant scale or repeatedly exposed to direct harm or serious detriment to their quality of life" Ibid.
; poziva Komisijo, naj pospeši rešitev in po potrebi zaključek tistih postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki državam članicam preprečujejo, da bi vlagale v infrastrukturne projekte, ki bi lahko vplivali na uresničevanje evropskega načrta za oživitev gospodarstva; poziva Komisijo, naj pristojnim parlamentarnim odborom predloži natančen načrt s pravili in roki specifičnih ukrepov, ki jih namerava izvajati na teh področjih;
; calls on the Commission to speed up the resolution and, where appropriate, closure of those infringement procedures that prevent Member States from investing in infrastructures that could affect the implementation of the European Economic Recovery Plan; calls on the Commission to provide the parliamentary committees responsible with a detailed plan setting out the time-limits and deadlines for the specific actions it intends to launch in these areas;
je seznanjen s tem, da se 1 196 od novih primerov kršitve v letu 2007 nanaša na neobveščanje o nacionalnih ukrepih za prenos direktiv Skupnosti; meni, da je nesprejemljivo, da si Komisija vzame dvanajst mesecev "Cilj primerov v zvezi z nesporočanjem ukrepov prenosa naj bi bil, da od pošiljanja uradnega opomina do rešitve zadeve ali postopka
Notes that, of the new cases of infringement in 2007, 1 196 concerned a failure to notify national measures relating to the transposition of Community directives; considers it unacceptable that the Commission should grant itself twelve months "For cases concerning the non-communication of transposition measures transposing directives, the target should be that no more than 12 months elapses from the sending of the letter of formal notice to the resolution of the case or seizure
na Sodišču ne mine več kot 12 mesecev" ( KOM(2007)0502 ).
of the Court of Justice" ( COM(2007)0502 ).
za obravnavo navadnih primerov nesporočanja države članice o ukrepih prenosa in poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme avtomatske in takojšnje ukrepe za tovrstne primere, ki ne zahtevajo analize ali ocene;
to deal with simple cases of non-communication of transposition measures by a Member State, and calls on the Commission to take automatic and immediate action in respect of cases of this kind which do not require any analysis or assessment;
meni, da še vedno ni jasnih postopkov, s katerimi bi državo članico zaradi kršitve prava Skupnosti, ki je bila sicer že odpravljena, lahko učinkovito privedli pred sodišče in dosegli povrnitev škode za vse, kar je bilo zamujeno ali opuščeno v preteklosti; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi nove predloge (do konca leta 2010), da bi trenutni postopek za ugotavljanje kršitev dopolnili tako, da bo upoštevano tudi to nepravično stanje;
Considers that there are still no clear procedures in place to effectively pursue a Member State before the Court of Justice for an infringement of Community law which has since been remedied and to obtain reparation for previous failures and omissions; urges the Commission to come forward with new proposals (by the end of 2010) to complete the current infringement procedure in such a way as to take account of this inequitable situation;
ugotavlja, da je Komisija začela pilotski projekt EU Pilot, da bi preverila novo delovno metodo v nekaterih državah članicah, da pri projektu, ki se je začel aprila 2008, sodeluje 15 držav članic, po oceni prvega leta delovanja pa bi ga lahko razširili še na druge države članice;
Notes that the Commission has launched the "EU Pilot" project to test the new working method in several Member States, that 15 Member States are taking part in the project, which began in April 2008, and that, once its first year of operation has been assessed, the project could be extended to the other Member States;
opaža, da gre vendarle za projekt, ki deluje na prostovoljni osnovi, katerega potek je že povzročil negotovost in sprožil specifična vprašanja (kot navedeno v zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji Parlamenta z dne 21. februarja 2008);
Points out that it is nevertheless a project operating on a voluntary basis, the features of which have already raised some doubts and specific questions (as mentioned in Parliament's above-mentioned resolution of 21 February 2008);
zlasti sprašuje Komisijo, ali pomanjkanje virov v državah članicah ne kaže na zaskrbljujoče probleme pri dejanskem nadzoru nad izvrševanjem prava Skupnosti; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj pri oceni projekta preveri naslednja vprašanja ter o njih poroča Parlamentu:
Asks the Commission in particular whether the lack of resources in the Member States is not a worrying sign that there may be genuine problems in monitoring the application of Community law; calls on the Commission, moreover, in its assessment of the project, to check the following issues and report to Parliament on them:
ali so pritožniki od Komisije prejeli jasno in izčrpno razlago v zvezi z obravnavo njihovih pritožb; ali je nova metoda dejansko prispevala k rešitvi njihovih primerov in ali ni vendar prispevala k temu, da je bila Komisijo razrešena odgovornosti, ki izhaja iz njene vloge varuhinje Pogodbe;
that complainants have received from the Commission clear, exhaustive explanations concerning the processing of their complaint; that the new method has genuinely helped to resolve their cases and that it has not removed all responsibility from the Commission in its role as "guardian of the Treaty";
ali nova metoda ne odloži še dodatno začetka postopka za ugotavljanje kršitev, katerega trajanje je že tako izredno dolgo in nedoločeno;
that the new method has not further delayed the launch of an infringement process the duration of which is already extremely long and indefinite;
ali je bila Komisija res neprizanesljiva do držav članic glede spoštovanja rokov, ki jih je določila (10 tednov), in ali je Komisija po izteku tega časa zadevnim državam članicam zagotovila jasne informacije in časovne okvire glede njenih prihodnjih ukrepov zato, da bi čim prej našla dokončno rešitev za državljane;
that the Commission has not shown any indulgence towards Member States as regards compliance with the deadlines set by the Commission (10 weeks) and that, on expiry of that period, the Commission has provided the Member State concerned with clear-cut information and time-frames regarding its future action in order to find an early definitive solution for the citizen;
ali se zaradi tega, ker so projekt EU Pilot izvajali le v 15 državah prostovoljkah, ni namenjalo manj pozornosti obravnavi kršitev pri tistih državah članicah, ki niso sodelovale pri projektu;
that the fact that the "EU Pilot" has been implemented in only 15 volunteer States does not mean that less attention has been paid to dealing with infringements in respect of those countries that have not participated in the project;
sprašuje, ali Komisija zaradi izvajanja projekta EU Pilot in posledičnega zmanjšanja delovne obremenitve v zvezi z obravnavo kršitev sedaj bolj sistematično in izčrpno nadzira prenos direktiv v nacionalne pravosodne sisteme;
Asks whether, thanks to the implementation of the EU Pilot project and the subsequent reduction of the workload in relation to dealing with infringements, the Commission is carrying out more systematic and exhaustive checks on the transposition of directives in the national legislative systems;
sprašuje Komisijo, če je projekt EU Pilot vplival na potek sestankov, ki jih ima Komisija z državami članicami, udeleženimi v projektu, ter z drugimi državami članicami, ki niso udeležene, ob upoštevanju, da naj bi bili ti sestanki poglavitni način obravnavanja in reševanja postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev;
Asks the Commission whether the "EU Pilot" project has affected the conduct of the package meetings that it holds for Member States involved in the project and for the other non-participating Member States, bearing in mind that such meetings are considered to be the main means of dealing with and resolving infringement procedures;
meni, da bi državljani EU od Komisije morali pričakovati enako raven preglednosti, ne glede na to, ali vložijo uradno pritožbo ali uveljavljajo pravico do peticije v skladu s pogodbo; zato zahteva, da mora biti Odbor za peticije stalno in podrobno obveščen o tem, na kateri stopnji so postopki za ugotavljanje kršitev, za katere so bile vložene peticije, ki še potekajo, v nasprotnem primeru pa mora odbor imeti dostop do ustreznih baz podatkov Komisije, in sicer pod enakimi pogoji kot Svet;
Considers that EU citizens should expect the same level of transparency from the Commission, whether they make a formal complaint or whether they exercise their right to petition under the Treaty; consequently, requests that the Committee on Petitions be provided with regular and clear information on the stages reached in infringement procedures also covered by an open petition, or failing this, that the committee be given access to the relevant Commission database on an equal footing with the Council;
opozarja Komisijo, da mora biti vsa korespondenca, za katero se lahko izkaže, da vsebuje pritožbo glede dejanske kršitve prava Skupnosti, registrirana kot pritožba, razen v izjemnih okoliščinah iz točke 3 priloge navedenega sporočila z dne 20. marca 2002;
Reminds the Commission that any correspondence which may contain a complaint about a genuine breach of Community law must be registered as a complaint unless it is covered by the exceptional circumstances referred to in point 3 of the annex to the above-mentioned communication of 20 March 2002;
opozarja, da je Komisija izjavila, da temeljna direktiva, kot je Direktiva 2004/38/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 29. aprila 2004 o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic UL L 158, 30.4.2004, str.
Notes that the Commission has declared that a fundamental directive such as Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p.