natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker terorizem ni nov pojav; ker se v zadnjih desetletjih terorizem pojavlja v novih oblikah, kot je recimo kibernetski terorizem, teroristične mreže pa so postale bolj zapletene, kar zadeva njihovo strukturo, sredstva in financiranje, zaradi česa je sama teroristična grožnja bolj zapletena; ker je boj proti terorizmu od vedno del področja pristojnosti držav članic in sodi med redne dejavnosti organov odkrivanja in pregona; ker so napadi 11. septembra ter v Madridu in Londonu prinesli korenite spremembe v dojemanju pojava terorizma ter v metodah in instrumentih za boj proti terorizmu; ker je zaradi teh napadov terorizem postal pojav, ki vpliva na varnost vse Evropske unije in ne le nacionalne varnosti držav članic z zelo različnimi pravnimi okviri,
F. whereas terrorism is not a recent phenomenon; whereas in recent decades terrorism has taken new forms such as cyber–terrorism, and terrorist networks have become more complex in structure, means and financing, thus making the terrorist threat all the more complex; whereas counter-terrorism has always been part of the sphere of competence of the Member States and of regular law enforcement action; whereas the 9/11, Madrid and London attacks led to a fundamental change in perception of the terrorist phenomenon and in the methods and instruments used to fight terrorism; and whereas as a result of those attacks terrorism became a matter affecting the security of the whole European Union and not just the national security of the Member States, with a very different legal framework,
G. ker ni nedvoumne in splošno sprejete opredelitve terorizma, kar ovira razpravo o terorizmu in boju proti njemu;
G. whereas there is no unambiguous and universally accepted definition of terrorism, which hampers discussion concerning terrorism and how to combat it,
H. ker je mednarodno sodelovanje bistveno, če želimo terorizmu odvzeti finančne, logistične in operativne temelje,
H. whereas international cooperation is essential to deprive terrorism of its financial, logistical and operational bases,
I. ker je kljub temu, da se izkušnje s terorizmom pa tudi raven ogroženosti med državami članicami razlikujejo, treba imeti skupen evropski pristop, saj teroristične operacije pogosto zajamejo vso Evropo, teroristi pa pri svoji dejavnosti izkoriščajo različnost evropskih zakonov, različne sposobnosti za boj proti terorizmu in odpravo mejnih kontrol,
I. whereas although experiences of terrorism, as well as threat levels, vary across the EU Member States, a common EU approach is needed since terrorist operations are often pan-European and terrorists make use of European diversity in laws and anti-terrorism capabilities and the abolition of border controls when committing their acts,
J. ker državljani EU in druge osebe prav tako želijo, da bi bili njihova varnost in zaščita v EU in drugod zagotovljeni, ter ima EU v zvezi s tem pomembno vlogo,
J. whereas EU citizens and other persons also want their safety and security guaranteed within the EU and elsewhere and the EU has an important role to play in this regard,
K. ker teroristična dejanja resno ogrožajo človekove pravice in demokracijo ter si prizadevajo omajati legitimno imenovane vlade, spodkopati pluralistične civilne družbe in ogroziti ideal vseh, ki je živeti življenje brez strahu,
K. whereas terrorist acts seriously jeopardise human rights, threaten democracy, aim to destabilise legitimately constituted governments, undermine pluralistic civil societies and challenge everyone’s ideal of leading a life free from fear,
L. ker bi moral biti namen protiterorističnih politik, da se borijo proti ciljem terorizma in izvrševanju terorističnih dejanj, katerih namen je, da uničijo strukturo naših svobodnih, odprtih in demokratičnih družb; ker morajo biti glavni cilji protiteroristične politike zaščita in okrepitev strukture demokratične družbe z okrepitvijo državljanskih svoboščin in demokratičnega nadzora, zagotavljanjem zaščite in varnosti evropskih državljanov, identifikacijo in preganjanjem subjektov, odgovornih za terorizem, ter z odzivom na posledice terorizma s pomočjo politike vključevanja, čezmejnega pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja ter učinkovite in usklajene strategije na ravni EU; ker je njeno uspešnost treba izmeriti glede na izpolnjevanje teh ciljev; ker je najuspešnejši način boja proti terorizmu osredotočanje na preprečevanje nasilnega ekstremizma in stopnjevanja nasilja,
L. whereas the aim of counter-terrorism policies should be to combat the objectives of terrorism and the execution of terrorist acts, which seek to destroy the fabric of free, open and democratic societies; whereas the prime objective of counter-terrorism must be to protect and strengthen that fabric of democratic societies by strengthening civil liberties and democratic scrutiny, by ensuring the security and safety of European citizens, by identifying the parties responsible for perpetrating terrorism and prosecuting them, and by responding to the consequences of a terrorist attack through inclusion policies, cross-border judicial and police cooperation and an effective and coordinated strategy at EU level; whereas the effectiveness of counter-terrorism policies must be measured against these aims; and whereas the counter-terrorism approach most likely to succeed is that of focusing on prevention of violent extremism and escalation,
M. ker strategija Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu ne sme obravnavati le posledic terorizma, temveč tudi njegove vzroke,
M. whereas the European Union’s counter-terrorism strategy should therefore address not only the consequences of terrorism but also its causes,
N. ker je boj proti nasilnemu ekstremizmu bistveni dejavnik preprečevanja in odprave terorizma,
N. whereas the fight against violent extremism is an essential element in the prevention and suppression of terrorism,
O. ker pomeni boj proti terorizmu boj proti vsem oblikam terorizma, vključno s kibernetskim terorizmom in terorizmom, povezanim s trgovino z drogami, proti povezanosti terorističnih skupin s številnimi kriminalnimi operacijami in znotraj njih ter taktikam, ki se uporabljajo za delovanje, kot so nezakonito financiranje, finančno izsiljevanje, pranje denarja in prikrivanje skupinskih terorističnih operacij s pomočjo lažnih pravnih oseb ali institucij,
O. whereas counter-terrorism means countering all forms of terrorism, including cyber‑terrorism, narco-terrorism and the interconnectability of terrorist groups with and within multiple criminal operations, as well as the tactics it uses to be operational such as illegal funding, financial extortion, money laundering and disguising terrorist groups operations under assumed legal entities or institutions,
P. ker je terorizem državni problem in je zato naloga demokratičnih institucij, da ob iskanju najširšega političnega in družbenega konsenza pripravijo in ohranijo glavne značilnosti protiteroristične politike; ker je demokratični boj proti terorizmu, neizogibno v okviru ustavne in pravne države, stvar vseh političnih strank, ki so zastopane v demokratičnih institucijah, ne glede na to, ali so v vladi ali v opoziciji; in ker je zaradi tega priporočljivo ohraniti opredelitev protiteroristične politike, po kateri je le-ta v vsaki demokratični družbi v pristojnosti vlade, ki se oblikuje po zakonitem soočenju političnih strank in s tem po volilnem tekmovanju,
P. whereas terrorism is a State problem and it is therefore the task of democratic institutions to draw up and preserve the main lines of counter-terrorism policy in a search for the widest possible political and social consensus; whereas the democratic fight against terrorism, necessarily within the bounds of the constitutional state and the rule of law, is a matter for all the political parties represented in democratic institutions, whether they be in government or opposition; and whereas this makes it advisable to preserve the definition of the counter-terrorism policy, according to which it is in any democratic society a matter for governments, arising from the lawful confrontation between political parties and thus from electoral competition,
Q. ker je razumno meriti stroške in koristi politike boja proti terorizmu , saj morajo snovalci politike vedeti, ali imajo njihove odločitve želeni uspeh, državljani pa imajo pravico, da izvoljene predstavnike pokličejo na odgovornost,
Q. whereas it is reasonable to measure the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism policies, as policy-makers should know if their decisions are having the desired impact and citizens have a right to hold their elected representatives to account,
R. ker je deset let po napadih, ki so pretresli svet, čas, da preučimo dosežek, ki je bil zabeležen v boju proti terorizmu; ker ovrednotenje omogoča bolj učinkovito in uspešno snovanje politike, za vsako moderno demokracijo pa morata biti značilna pogosto preučevanje in ocena političnih odločitev,
R. whereas ten years after the attacks that shook the world it is time to take stock of achievements in fighting terrorism; whereas evaluation allows for more efficient and effective policy-making and in any modern democracy policy decisions must be subject to frequent evaluation and review,
S. ker je bilo na področju politike boja proti terorizmu presenetljivo malo storjenega za oceno, do kolikšne mere je ta politika dosegla zadane cilje; ker je Parlament večkrat pozval k celoviti oceni politike EU za boj proti terorizmu, saj sta ovrednotenje in ocena predpogoja za preglednost in odgovornost snovalcev politike; in ker gre pomanjkanje ustrezne ocene politike EU za boj proti terorizmu v glavnem pripisati dejstvu, da se velik del te politike izvaja na področju obveščevalnih in varnostnih politik, za katere je že od nekdaj značilna tajnost,
S. whereas remarkably little has been done to assess to what degree EU counter-terrorism policies have achieved the stated objectives; whereas Parliament has repeatedly called for a thorough evaluation of EU counter-terrorism policies, as evaluation and assessment are preconditions for the transparency and accountability of policy-makers; and whereas the absence of proper evaluation of EU counter-terrorism policies is mainly due to the fact that a large part of it is conducted in the area of intelligence and security policies, where there is a tradition of secrecy,
T. ker je vsakič znova namen terorističnih napadov povzročiti masovne žrtve, s čimer se izzivajo razpoložljive institucionalne zmogljivosti,
T. whereas terrorist attacks have repeatedly aimed at causing mass causalities, challenging available institutional capacities,
U. ker so tarča teroristov nedolžni državljani, da se tako doseže cilj uničenja demokracije; ker imajo tisti, ki so bili poškodovani ali ki so izgubili bližnje v terorističnih napadih oziroma so bili z njimi oškodovani, pravico do podpore, solidarnosti, odškodnine, nadomestila in pomoči,
U. whereas terrorists target innocent civilians in order to achieve their objective of destroying democracy; whereas those who have suffered injury, damage or loss of their loved ones in terrorist attacks are entitled to our support and solidarity, and to receive reparation, compensation and assistance,
V. ker je bistveno, da se zadosti pravici, da se sodi odgovornim in da se kaznujejo teroristična dejanja, in ker je treba posebno pozornost posvetiti položaju žrtev kot prič v sodnih postopkih,
V. whereas it is vital that justice be done, that the guilty ones are brought to trial and that terrorist crimes do not go unpunished, whereas the position of victims as witnesses in judicial proceedings needs special attention,
W. ker sta odgovornost in obveznost bistvena dejavnika demokratične legitimnosti protiterorističnih politik in ker je treba preiskati in sodno preganjati nezakonito delovanje, kršitve mednarodnega prava in prava človekovih pravic,
W. whereas accountability and responsibility are essential factors for the democratic legitimacy of counter-terrorism policies, whereas mistakes, unlawful actions and violations of international law and human rights law must be investigated and judicially prosecuted,
X. ker morajo protiteroristični ukrepi spoštovati pravice, ki jih določa Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, vsi ukrepi, sprejeti na tem področju, pa vplivajo na državljanske svoboščine,
X. whereas counter-terrorism measures must respect the rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and any measure adopted in this field has a reciprocal impact on civil liberties,
Y. ker je množičen nadzor postal osrednja značilnost protiteroristične politike, za preprečevanje terorizma pa se uporablja obsežno zbiranje osebnih podatkov, tehnologije za odkrivanje in prepoznavanje, zasledovanje in sledenje, podatkovno rudarjenje in profiliranje, ocenjevanje tveganja in analize vedenja ali podobne tehnike; ker ta sredstva prinašajo tveganje, da se bo dokazno breme prevalilo na državljane; ker sta stopnja učinkovitosti in uspeha teh instrumentov pri preprečevanju terorizma vprašljiva; in ker je izmenjava informacij med agencijami neustrezna,
Y. whereas mass surveillance has become a key feature of counter-terrorism policies and whereas the large-scale collection of personal data, detection and identification technologies, tracking and tracing, data mining and profiling, risk assessment and behavioural analysis are all used for the purpose of preventing terrorism; whereas these instruments entail the risk of shifting the burden of proof to the citizen; whereas the effectiveness and success rates of these instruments for the prevention of terrorism are dubious; and whereas the sharing of information between agencies is inadequate,
Z. ker javni organi vse pogosteje uporabljajo podatke, ki so bili zbrani v poslovne ali zasebne namene; ker so podjetja v različnih sektorjih dolžna hraniti osebne podatke o svojih strankah in jih posredovati; ker so stroški, povezani s hrambo in obnovo podatkov (tako naložbe v infrastrukturo kot operativni stroški), veliki,
Z. whereas public authorities are making more and more use of data collected for commercial or private purposes; whereas private companies in various sectors are obliged to retain and provide personal data from their customer databases; whereas the costs connected with the storage and retrieval of data (both infrastructure investments and operational costs) are considerable,
AA. ker je pereča potreba po enotni pravni opredelitvi pojma profiliranja, ki bi temeljila na ustreznih standardih o temeljnih pravicah in varstvu podatkov, s čimer bi se zmanjšala negotovost o tem, katere dejavnosti so prepovedane in katere niso,
AA. whereas there is an urgent need for a uniform legal definition of the concept of ‘profiling’ based on the relevant fundamental rights and data protection standards in order to reduce uncertainty as to which activities are prohibited and which are not,
4. meni, da bi Listina o temeljnih pravicah vedno morala biti usmerjevalnik za politiko EU na tem področju ter za izvrševanje te politike v državah članicah, pa tudi za sodelovanje s tretjimi stranmi in tretjimi državami;
Believes that the Charter of Fundamental Rights should always be the compass for EU policies in this field and for Member States in the implementation thereof, as well as in cooperation with third parties and third countries;
9. poudarja dejstvo, da bi morali biti rezultat ocene desetih let protiteroristične politike EU jasno opredeljeni politični cilji;
Underlines the fact that the evaluation of ten years of EU counter-terrorism policies should result in clearly defined policy objectives;
17. meni, da morajo biti protiteroristični ukrepi sorazmerni ravni ogroženosti in da se morajo prilagoditi tako njenemu povečanju kot njenemu zmanjšanju; ugotavlja, da morajo biti protiteroristični ukrepi, tako v obliki novih vladnih pooblastil kot tudi agencij, načrtovani tako, da jih je mogoče okrepiti ali zmanjšati, odvisno od situacije;
Takes the view that counter-terrorism measures must be commensurate with the threat level and that they must be adjusted in response to both an increase and a decrease in threat level; notes that counter-terrorism measures, in terms of both new government powers and agencies, must be designed in such a way that they can be scaled up as well as down, depending on the situation;
20. poziva k vzpostavitvi celovite strategije o medsebojni povezanosti mednarodnega organiziranega kriminala, trgovine z drogami in terorizma; spodbuja stalno analizo novih teženj in značilnosti pri diverzifikaciji, radikalizaciji in novačenju ter teženj in značilnosti, povezanih z vlogo mednarodnih nevladnih organizacij pri financiranju terorizma;
Calls for the creation of a comprehensive strategy on the interconnection between international organised crime, drug trafficking and terrorism; and encourages continuous analysis of new trends and traits in diversification, radicalisation and recruitment, and those related to the role of international non-governmental organisations in terrorism financing;
24. poziva Komisijo, visoko predstavnico Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko in Svet, naj hitro storijo vse potrebno za izvajanje solidarnostne klavzule, ki je bila uvedena z Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Calls on the Commission, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the Council to quickly implement arrangements for the solidarity clause introduced by the Lisbon Treaty;
26. poudarja, da se mora ustrezna ocena desetletne protiteroristične politike osredotočiti na ugotavljanje, ali ukrepi EU za preprečevanje terorizma in boj proti njemu, temeljijo na dokazih (namesto na domnevah) in potrebah, ter ali so dosledni in del celovite protiteroristične strategije EU; ta ocena pa naj temelji na poglobljenem in celostnem ovrednotenju, opravljenem v skladu s členom 70 PDEU, Komisija pa naj o tem poroča na skupnemu parlamentarnemu srečanju odborov Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov, odgovornih za nadzor nad protiterorističnimi dejavnostmi, in sicer v šestih mesecih od naročila izvedbe študije; skupina naj za svoje delo uporablja poročila, ki jih pridobi od pomembnih organizacij in agencij, kot so Europol, Eurojust, Agencija za temeljne pravice, evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, Svet Evrope in Združeni narodi;
Stresses that a proper evaluation of ten years of counter-terrorism policies should focus on examining whether the measures taken to prevent and combat terrorism in the EU have been evidence-based (and not based on assumptions), needs-driven, coherent and part of a comprehensive EU counter-terrorism strategy , based on an in-depth and complete appraisal, to be carried out in line with Article 70 of the TFEU, with the Commission reporting back to a Joint Parliamentary Meeting of the European Parliament and national parliamentary committees responsible for overseeing counter-terrorism activities within six months of the study being commissioned, drawing upon reports to be requested from relevant organisations and agencies such as Europol, Eurojust, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the European Data Protection Supervisor, the Council of Europe and the United Nations;
(a) nudi jasno analizo vložkov in učinkov protiteroristične grožnje, ki temelji na jasni in podrobni opredelitvi, dogovorjeni na ravni EU, pa tudi okvira protiterorističnih politik v Evropi v zadnjem desetletju, in jasno opredli dosežke politik v smislu učinkovitosti, preprečevanja, sodnega pregona in povečane varnosti v Evropi;
(a) Provide a clear input and output analysis of the terrorist threat based on an agreed definition at EU level, as well as of the framework of counter-terrorism policies in Europe in the past decade to address this threat, and set out clearly the results of the policies in terms of effectiveness, prevention, prosecution and increased security in Europe;
(b) opredeli dejstva in podatke v zvezi s teroristično dejavnostjo (število uspešnih, ponesrečenih in preprečenih napadov) in protiteroristično dejavnostjo (priprtja in obsodbe), kolikor to omogočajo podatki, ki so na voljo Komisiji, in kolikor mogoče natančno; poudarja, da morajo biti podatki dokazljivi in navzkrižno preverljivi;
(b) Set out the facts and figures, including the budget funding allocated, relating to terrorist activity (successful, failed and prevented attacks) and counter-terrorism activity (arrests and convictions), to the extent that the data are available to the Commission, and in as much detail as possible; stresses that such figures must be verifiable and subject to cross‑examination;
(c) vključi celovit pregled vseh učinkov protiterorističnih ukrepov na državljanske svoboščine in temeljne pravice, vključno s politikami držav članic in ukrepi tretjih držav z neposrednim učinkom v EU in vsemi ukrepi, ki so v zvezi s tem sprejeti v okviru sosedske politike, s kvantitativnim prikazom vsaj v smislu statistik o diskriminaciji in kršitev državljanskih svoboščin, ki jih je mogoče najti v sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, Sodišča Evropske unije in nacionalnih sodišč;
(c) Include a full overview of the accumulated impact of counter-terrorism measures on civil liberties and fundamental rights, including Member State policies, measures by third countries with a direct impact in the EU and all measures taken in this field under the neighbourhood policy, quantified at least in terms of discrimination statistics and violations of civil liberties found in the relevant case law of the ECHR, the Court of Justice of the European Union and national courts;
(d) prouči, ali so sedanji instrumenti za ocenjevanje učinkov na zasebnost in državljanske svoboščine zadovoljivi in utemeljeni na mednarodnih primerjalnih analizah, ki jih uporabljajo demokratične države, ob upoštevanju medinstitucionalnih sporazumov in drugih dejavnosti, povezanih z boljšo pripravo zakonodaje;
(d) Examine whether the current instruments for assessing the impact on privacy and civil liberties are adequate and based on international benchmarking practices implemented by democratic countries, taking into account the interinstitutional agreements and further activities on better lawmaking;
(e) preuči učinkovitost in sorazmernost pooblastil, podeljenih agencijam in službam EU, pri boju proti terorizmu;
(e) Examine how effective and proportionate the powers entrusted to EU agencies and services are in the fight against terrorism;
(f) ugotovi, kako bi lahko protiteroristične ukrepe izboljšali v primeru varnostnih vrzeli, ki bi lahko bile zlorabljene za izvajanje terorističnih dejanj;
(f) Identify how counter-terrorism measures can be improved in cases where there are gaps in security which can be abused for the purposes of carrying out terrorist acts;
– izdatke, izrecno namenjene protiterorističnim ukrepom
- expenditure specifically labelled as being for counter-terrorism measures,
– izdatke za politike, ki vključujejo protiteroristične dejavnosti
- expenditure for policies that include counter-terrorism activities,
– izdatke za osebje in agencije EU, ki izvajajo protiteroristične dejavnosti
- expenditure for EU staff and agencies carrying out counter-terrorism tasks,
– izdatke za informacijske sisteme in podatkovne zbirke, povezane z bojem proti terorizmu
- expenditure for counter–terrorism-related IT systems and databases,
– izdatke za raziskovalne projekte, ki jih EU (so)financira na področju boja proti terorizmu ali z njim povezanih področjih
- expenditure for research projects (co-)funded by the European Union in the area of counter-terrorism or related areas,
– izdatke za zaščito temeljnih pravic in varstva podatkov v okviru boja proti terorizmu
- expenditure for protection of fundamental rights and data protection in the context of counter-terrorism,
– izdatke za krepitev demokracije in pravne države
- expenditure for strengthening democracy and the rule of law,
– analizo razvoja omenjenih proračunskih vrstic v proračunu EU po letu 2001
- an analysis of the development of the above EU budget lines since 2001;
Demokratični nadzor in odgovornost
Democratic scrutiny and accountability