natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
G. ker finančna kriza in recesija „dejanskega gospodarstva“, povezani z drugimi strukturnimi dejavniki (podnebne spremembe in onesnaževanje okolja, kriza zaradi pomanjkanja hrane in energetska kriza, trgovina itd.), kažeta, da je to sistemska kriza sodobnega kapitalizma,
G. whereas the financial crisis and the downturn in the ‘real economy’, entangled together with other structural factors (climate change and environmental degradation, food and energy crisis, trade, etc.), reveal this to be a systemic crisis of contemporary capitalism,
H. ker so vlade po vsem svetu namenile ogromne zneske za pomoč bankam in finančnim ustanovam, pri čemer so samo države članice EU za ukrepe državne pomoči ali jamstva odobrile sredstva v skupni višini 363,1 milijarde EUR (kar je enako 30,5 % BDP EU); ker takšne politike vodijo k podružbljanju izgub finančnega sektorja, namesto da bi pripeljale k trajnostni nacionalizaciji zdravega bančnega premoženja;
H. whereas huge amounts of aid were granted by governments worldwide to banks and financial institutions, only the EU Member States approved a total of € 363.1 billion (equivalent to 30.5 % of EU GDP) of State aid measures or guarantees in that respect; whereas such policies result in the financial sectors’ losses being socialised instead of steps being taken towards a sustainable nationalisation of the banks’ healthy assets,
I. ker je treba zaradi sedanje krize še toliko bolj združiti gospodarske in politične moči po vsem svetu, da bi z usklajeno fiskalno politiko odpravili krizo in obvladali finančne trge; ker najbolj razvite države, zlasti ZDA, Japonska in EU, ne morejo več same reševati problemov;
I. whereas the current crisis underlines the need to combine the economic and political power of the entire world in order to tackle the crisis by means of coordinated fiscal policies and to curb the financial markets; whereas the most developed countries, especially the US, Japan and the EU, are no longer able to solve the problems single-handed,
2. kljub temu poudarja, da tudi skupina G20 zastopa le del svetovnega gospodarstva; zato vztraja, da ZN ohranijo pomembno vlogo pri reševanju gospodarske krize, zlasti pri zadostitvi nujnih potreb najrevnejših držav na svetu;
Stresses, however, that even the G20 is only a part of the global economy; insists therefore on the important role of the UN in tackling the economic crisis, especially in meeting the urgent requirements of the poorest countries in the world;
4. obsoja dejstvo, da še ni bila opredeljena struktura tovrstne nove ureditve; obžaluje, da se standardi ureditve finančnega sektorja v različnih sodnih oblasteh še vedno zelo razlikujejo; ostro kritizira vsesplošno razširjeno prepričanje, ki vlada med evropskimi in ameriškimi politiki, češ da bi obširnejša ureditev, ki bi bila sprejeta hitro, le pretresla finančne trge oziroma jim celo škodila;
Criticises the fact that the architecture of such a new order has not been laid down in the meantime; regrets that financial regulatory standards, furthermore, vary to a high degree amongst different jurisdictions; criticises strongly the widespread attitude among European and American politicians that a higher speed and broader scope of financial regulation would only disturb or harm the ‘markets’;
6. je prepričan, da za krizo ne gre kriviti le pohlepnih menedžerjev iz finančnega sektorja, pač pa v enaki meri tudi vlado ZDA, vlade skoraj vseh držav članic EU ter institucije EU, saj so vse spodbujale liberalizacijo finančnih trgov; meni, da so bila tako ohlapna „zavezujoča pravila“ o izplačilu nagrad predlagana tudi zato, da bo javnost pomirjena, češ da se ukrepa v tej smeri;
Is convinced that the blame for the crisis lies not only with greedy managers in the financial industry, but, equally, with the governments of the US and of nearly all the EU Member States, as well as with the EU institutions, all of which have promoted the liberalisation of financial markets; considers that such vaguely defined ‘binding rules’ for bonus pay are also proposed to demonstrate action to reassure the public;
Usmerjanje trgov, boj proti depresiji ter zagotovitev delovnih mest in pravic
Guide the markets, fight depression and secure jobs and rights
12. glede na razmere v Evropski uniji poudarja svoj poziv Komisiji in Svetu, naj pripravita dodatni „evropski investicijski program za trajnostni razvoj, zaposlovanje in socialno vključenost“, ki bo znašal vsaj 1 % BDP EU in ki bi ga dopolnili s podobnimi javnimi investicijskimi programi držav članic;
Underlines, with a view to the situation in the European Union, its call on the Commission and the Council to draw up an additional ‘European Investment Programme for Sustainable Development, Employment and Social Inclusion’ of at least 1 % of EU GDP, which should be complemented by similar public investment programmes in the Member States;
14. poudarja, da mora strategija izhoda na podlagi načrtov za oživitev, kakršna koli že bo, temeljiti na prerazporeditvi bogastva in prihodka od zgoraj navzdol; meni, da moramo, če želimo zmanjšati primanjkljaj, takoj po prvem močnejšem okrevanju spodbujati obdavčenje po načelu „največje breme naj nosijo najmočnejši“, da bi lahko dosegli pravično porazdelitev davčnih obveznosti in hkrati zagotovili obsežne pravice delavcev, močno socialno državo, širitev javnih služb in izboljšano socialno in ozemeljsko kohezijo.
Points out that any exit strategy from economic stimulus programmes must be based on a policy of re-distribution of wealth and income from top to bottom; considers that, in order to bring down deficits as soon as there is a robust recovery, progressive taxation according to the principle ‘the strongest shoulders carry the strongest burden’ must be promoted in order to achieve distributive justice with robust workers’ rights, a strong welfare state, an expansion of public services and improved social and territorial cohesion;
16. pozdravlja izjemen napredek, ki je dosežen v zvezi z upravljanjem mednarodnih finančnih institucij, kjer se zdaj upošteva naraščajoča moč držav v razvoju; poudarja, da je prenos vsaj petih odstotkov glasovalnih pravic v Mednarodnem denarnem skladu in treh odstotkov v Svetovni banki z držav, ki so doslej imele prevelik vpliv, na tiste, ki so imele premajhnega, zgolj prvi korak v pravo smer. podpira predloge voditeljev Brazilije, Rusije in Indije, da se sedem odstotkov kvot Mednarodnega denarnega sklada prenese v korist držav v razvoju; pozdravlja zavezo skupine G20 o zaščiti deleža glasovalnih pravic najrevnejših držav v Mednarodnem denarnem skladu; poziva predsedstvo in Komisijo, naj potrdita analizo in predloge sprememb odbora strokovnjakov ZN za reformo mednarodnega monetarnega sistema pod vodstvom Josepha Stiglitza;
Welcomes the breakthrough which has been made in international financial institutions’ governance reform recognising the developing countries’ rising strength; underlines that a shift of at least five percent of voting power at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and three percent at the World Bank from over-represented countries to under-represented countries can only be seen as a first step in the right direction; supports the proposal of the leaders of Brazil, Russia and India for a seven percent shift in IMF quotas in favour of developing countries; welcomes the commitment of the G20 to protect the voting share of the poorest in the IMF; appeals to the Presidency and the Commission to endorse the analysis and the reform proposals of the United Nations Commission of Experts on Reforms on the International Monetary System, chaired by Joseph Stiglitz;
19. pozdravlja dejstvo, da izjava potrjuje cilje, določbe in načela okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja; podarja, da je v Københavnu treba doseči ambiciozen sporazum skozi pogajanja o okvirni konvenciji o spremembi podnebja;
Welcomes the fact that the Statement reaffirms the objective, provisions and principles of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); underlines the need to reach an ambitious agreement in Copenhagen through the UNFCCC negotiations;
22. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje voditeljem držav skupine G20, Svetu, euroskupini, Komisiji, Evropski centralni banki, parlamentom držav članic, Odboru regij in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the G20 leaders, the Council, the Eurogroup, the Commission, the European Central Bank, the parliaments of the Member States, the Committee of the Regions and the European Economic and Social Committee.
30.9.2009 B7-0086/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavah Sveta in Komisije
30.9.2009 B7-0086/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on statements by the Council and Commission
o vrhu skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu
on the Pittsburgh G20 Summit of 24/25 September 2009
PE428.690v01-00 B7‑0086/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o vrhu skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu
PE428.690v01-00 B7‑0086/2009 European Parliament resolution on the Pittsburgh G20 Summit of 24/25 September 2009
– ob upoštevanju izjave voditeljev, podane ob koncu vrha skupine G20 v Pittsburghu 25. septembra 2009,
– having regard to the Leaders' Statement issued at the end of the Pittsburgh Group of Twenty (G20) Summit of 25 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2009 o vrhu skupine G20 2. aprila 2009 v Londonu,
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2009 on the London G20 Summit of 2 April 2009,
A. ker proces oživljanja gospodarstva še ni končan, ker imajo številne države nesprejemljivo visoko brezposelnost in ker se ta lahko v prihodnjih mesecih še poveča,
A. whereas the process of economic recovery remains incomplete, with unemployment at an unacceptably high level in many countries and the possibility that it may increase even more in the months to come,
B. ker je glavni izziv, s katerim se je treba spopasti, da bi zagotovili ponovno gospodarsko rast, uresničitev prehoda od javnega vira povpraševanja k zasebnemu; ker je za močno, uravnoteženo in trajnostno gospodarsko rast zelo pomemben odločilen napredek na področju strukturnih reform,
B. whereas the main challenge to be met in assuring a return to economic growth is achieving a shift from public to private source of demand; whereas decisive progress on structural reforms is essential in order to achieve strong economic growth which is balanced and sustainable,
C. ker bi morali sedanje gospodarske težave izkoristiti kot priložnost za spodbujanje lizbonskih in göteborških ciljev, za ponovne zaveze za boj proti brezposelnosti in podnebnim spremembam ter za zmanjšanje porabe energije,
C. whereas the present economic difficulties should be used as an opportunity to promote the Lisbon-Göteborg goals and to reiterate the commitment to fight unemployment and climate change and to reduce energy consumption,
D. ker so večje pomanjkljivosti v regulaciji in nadzoru poleg nepremišljenega in neodgovornega tveganja nekaterih finančnih institucij ter prekomernega zagotavljanja likvidnosti zaradi ohlapne monetarne politike v nekaterih delih sveta pomembno prispevali k sedanji krizi,
D. whereas major failures in regulation and supervision, added to reckless and irresponsible risk‑taking by some financial institutions and the oversupply of liquidity due to a lax monetary policy in some parts of the world, have contributed significantly to the current crisis,
E. ker je za obnovitev gospodarske rasti zelo pomembno mednarodno usklajevanje,
E. whereas international coordination is essential to restoring economic growth,
F. ker je za preprečitev protekcionističnih teženj potrebno intenzivno večstransko sodelovanje,
F. whereas strong multilateral cooperation is needed to avoid any protectionist tendencies,
Splošne pripombe.
General remarks.
Obnovitev rasti in zaposlovanja
Restoring growth and jobs
2. poudarja, da je najprej treba nameniti prednost močni rasti realnega gospodarstva, zagotovitvi delovanja kapitalskih trgov in posojil, podpori in spodbujanju zaposlenosti ter obvarovanju ljudi pred negativnimi posledicami krize, pri tem pa posebno skrb posvetiti najrevnejšim in najranljivejšim;
Stresses that the immediate priority must be to get strong growth in the real economy, to ensure that the capital markets and lending function properly, to sustain and promote employment, and to protect people from the adverse impact of the crisis, paying special attention to the poorest and most vulnerable;
Krepitev finančnega nadzora in reguliranja
Strengthening financial supervision and regulation
– ustvarjanje kakovostnega kapitala in zmanjševanje procikličnosti,
– building high‑quality capital and mitigating pro-cyclicality,
– preoblikovanje prakse nadomestil, da bi okrepili finančno stabilnost,
– reforming compensation practices to support financial stability,
– izboljšanje trgov z izvedenimi finančnimi instrumenti,
– improving over-the-counter derivatives markets,
– obravnava čezmejnih rešitev in sistemsko pomembnih finančnih institucij;
– addressing cross-border resolutions and systemically important financial institutions;
Krepitev svetovnih finančnih institucij
Strengthening our global financial institutions
13. poudarja, da je treba vse prevzete obveznosti spoštovati v celoti, jih izvesti hitro ter podrobneje določiti na nacionalni in mednarodni ravni, da bi ponovno vzpostavili zaupanje in čim bolj oživili gospodarstvo;
Stresses the fact that all the commitments entered into must be respected in full, put in place rapidly and fleshed out, at national and international level, in order to rebuild confidence and maximise the economic recovery;
5.10.2009 B7-0087/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
5.10.2009 B7-0087/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o varstvu ozemlja, nadzoru nad območji s tveganimi hidrogeološkimi razmerami in evropskem centru za zbiranje podatkov
on land protection, monitoring the situation in areas subject to hydrogeological hazards and a European data collection centre
PE428.692v01-00 B7‑0087/2009 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o varstvu ozemlja, nadzoru nad območji s tveganimi hidrogeološkimi razmerami in evropskem centru za zbiranje podatkov
PE428.692v01-00 B7‑0087/2009 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on land protection, monitoring the situation in areas subject to hydrogeological hazards and a European data collection centre
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o varstvu ozemlja, s posebno navedbo hidrogeološkega vidika,
– having regard to its previous resolutions on land protection, with particular reference to the hydrogeological aspect,
A. ker so zaporedne pogoste okoljske katastrofe terjale številna človeška življenja in povzročile velikansko okoljsko škodo,
A. whereas a rapid succession of environmental disasters has caused the tragic loss of many human lives as well as extensive environmental damage,
B. ker so zaradi tega prebivalci območij, ki so jih prizadele tovrstne katastrofe – na primer sedaj v pokrajini Messina –utrpeli tudi hudo gospodarsko škodo,
B. whereas this results in serious economic damage to the inhabitants of areas struck by disasters of this kind, as is the case at present in the province of Messina,
C. ker je treba spremljati razmere na teh območjih, da bi preprečili gradnjo hiš in tovarn na površinah, ki zaradi geoloških značilnosti za to niso primerne, ter ukrepali proti tistim, ki teh predpisov ne upoštevajo,
C. whereas these areas must be monitored to prevent the construction of houses or other buildings on land whose geological characteristics make it unsuitable for that purpose and to take action against anyone breaking the rules,
3. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj poskrbita za ustanovitev evropskega centra, ki bo zbiral podatke o zadevnih nevarnostih in redno nadzoroval upoštevanje veljavnih prepovedi.
Calls on the Commission and the Council to set up a European centre to collect data relating to the hazards in question and check at regular intervals for compliance with the restrictions imposed.
14.10.2009 B7-0088/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.10.2009 B7-0088/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
on freedom of information in Italy
PE428.694v01-00 B7‑0088/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
PE428.694v01-00 B7‑0088/2009 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy
– ob upoštevanju evropskih in mednarodnih obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic, med drugim tistih, ki so zapisane v konvencijah Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah in v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to European and international obligations in the field of human rights, such as those set out in the United Nations conventions on human rights and the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
– ob upoštevanju določb Evropske unije o človekovih pravicah in temeljnih svoboščinah, zlasti Evropske listine o temeljnih pravicah,
– having regard to European Union provisions concerning human rights and fundamental freedoms, in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
A. ker izjava, da v Italiji ni svobode obveščanja, žali Italijo in njene državljane ter milijone ljudi, ki tam živijo in se svobodno izražajo v svojem vsakdanjem življenju, kot so novinarji, zgodovinarji, filozofi, strokovnjaki, pisatelji in učitelji,
A. whereas to claim that freedom of information is being flouted in Italy is an affront to the country as a whole, its citizens and the millions of individuals, including journalists, historians, philosophers, scholars, writers and teachers, who live there and avail themselves of freedom of expression in their everyday lives,
B. ker je pomanjkanje svobode obveščanja tipično za družbe, kjer diktature in totalitarni režimi odrekajo ali so v preteklosti odrekali ljudem njihove pravice in temeljne svoboščine,
B. whereas the lack of freedom of information is typical of life under dictatorships and totalitarian regimes which have deprived or are continuing to deprive people of their fundamental rights and freedoms,
C. ker je Italija parlamentarna demokracija in ena od šestih ustanovnih držav Evropske unije,
C. whereas Italy is a true parliamentary democracy and one of the six founder members of the European Union,
D. ker je v Italiji svoboda tiska zajamčena z ustavno listino, ki uzakonja pravico do svobodnega izražanja svojega prepričanja,
D. whereas in Italy freedom of the press is guaranteed by the Constitution, in which the right to full freedom of thought and expression is enshrined,
E. ker v Italiji obstaja pluralizem svobodnih in neodvisnih sredstev obveščanja, časopisov, radijev in televizij na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni, ki imajo popolno svobodo obveščanja in izražanja mnenj,
E. whereas Italy has a wide range of free and independent media, including newspapers, radio and television operating at national, regional and local level and enjoying full freedom of information and expression,
F. ker mora biti Evropski parlament mesto srečanja in predlogov za izboljšanje življenjskih razmer v vseh državah članicah Evropske unije,
F. whereas the European Parliament must be a forum in which to discuss and propose ways of improving living conditions in each of the Member States,
G. ker je prav v preteklih dneh predsednik Italijanske republike Giorgio Napolitano na srečanju z evropskimi parlamentarci, izvoljenimi v Italiji, namenjenemu temu vprašanju, dejal, da Evropski parlament ne more biti prizivna instanca proti sklepom nacionalnih parlamentov in obnašanju nacionalnih vlad in da za reševanje takšnih vprašanj obstajajo ustrezni sedeži,
G. whereas over the last few days the President of the Italian Republic, Mr Giorgio Napolitano, observed – during discussions on this matter with Members of the European Parliament elected in Italy – that the European Parliament 'cannot act as a court of appeal in respect of decisions by national parliaments and national government policies' and that appropriate fora exist for this purpose,
H. ker se vsak človek v primeru domnevnega klevetanja lahko zateče po sodno pomoč, saj je to pravica, ki jo italijanski zakon priznava vsakemu državljanu, v preteklosti pa so to pravico uveljavili politični vodje vseh političnih prepričanj, uveljavljanje pravice pa ne more v nobenem primeru šteti kot ustrahovalno dejanje,
H. whereas in Italy legal redress in cases of alleged defamation is available to every individual, this being a statutory right enjoyed by every individual and one that had been exercised by political leaders of every hue in the past; whereas the exercise of a right may in no case be considered as an act of intimidation,
14.10.2009 B7-0089/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.10.2009 B7-0089/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE428.695v01-00 B7‑0089/2009 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o svobodi obveščanja v Italiji
PE428.695v01-00 B7‑0089/2009 European Parliament resolution on freedom of information in Italy
– ob upoštevanju mednarodnih in evropskih obveznosti na področju človekovih pravic, med drugimi tistih, ki so zapisane v konvencijah Združenih narodov o človekovih pravicah in v Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter v členih 6 in 7 Pogodbe,
– having regard to international and European human rights obligations, such as those contained in the UN conventions on human rights, in the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and in Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty,
A. ker so trditve o kratenju svobode obveščanja v Italiji žalitev za celo državo, njene državljane in za milijone tam živečih ljudi, ki v vsakdanjem življenju uveljavljajo svobodo izražanja, vključno z novinarji, zgodovinarji, filozofi, akademiki, pisatelji in učitelji, obenem pa je to tudi žalitev zdravega razuma,
A. whereas the allegation that freedom of information is denied in Italy is an affront to the whole country, to its citizens and the millions of people living there and exercising freedom of expression in their daily lives, including journalists, historians, philosophers, scholars, writers and teachers, and to common sense,
B. ker je pomanjkanje svobode obveščanja značilno za države, kjer diktatorski ali totalitarni režimi ljudem kratijo temeljne pravice in svoboščine,
B. whereas the lack of freedom of information is typical of those countries where dictatorships or totalitarian regimes have denied people their fundamental rights and freedoms,
C. ker v Italiji svobodo tiska zagotavlja člen 21 italijanske ustave, ki zagotavlja pravico do svobodnega izražanja osebnega mnenja,
C. whereas in Italy press freedom is ensured by Article 21 of the Italian Constitution, which establishes the right to freely express one's thinking,
D. ker v Italiji deluje veliko različnih javnih in zasebnih sredstev javnega obveščanja, kar vključuje časopise, radijske in televizijske postaje, ki so številnejša kot v mnogih državah EU in imajo popolno svobodo obveščanja in izražanja,
D. whereas in Italy there is a large variety of public and private mass media, including newspapers, radio and television stations, which are more numerous than in several EU countries and which enjoy complete freedom of information and expression,
E. ker je uporaba pravnih sredstev v primeru domnevnega obrekovanja (to možnost so v preteklosti uporabili politični voditelji različne strankarske pripadnosti) pravica, ki jo italijanska zakonodaja priznava in zagotavlja vsakemu državljanu, zato se njena uporaba v nobenem primeru ne sme obravnavati kot dejanje zastraševanja drugih,
E. whereas seeking legal redress in a case of alleged defamation - a possibility that has been used by political leaders regardless of party affiliation - is a right enshrined in Italian law and granted to each citizen, and exercising this right cannot in any way be considered as an intimidatory act,
14.10.2009 B7-0090/2009 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.10.2009 B7-0090/2009 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission