natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
z vedno večjo zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bi lahko nekateri kratkoročni ukrepi, ki so jih države članice sprejele na nacionalni ravni, izkrivili konkurenco na notranjem trgu in ogrozili dolgoročno konkurenčnost, ter zato poziva države članice, naj bodo nadaljnji ukrepi dosledni, učinkoviti in usklajeni;
Notes with increasing concern that some short-term measures adopted at national level by Member States could contribute to the distortion of competition within the single market, damaging long-term competitiveness, and calls therefore on Member States to ensure that further measures are coherent, efficient and coordinated;
pozdravlja prizadevanja Komisije za zagotovitev učinkovitega političnega odziva na težave podjetja General Motors Europe in njegovih dobaviteljev z usklajevanjem prizadevanj ustreznih držav članic, vključno z organizacijo srečanja ministrov 13. marca 2009 in iskanjem poštene in pravične rešitve za vprašanje pravic intelektualne lastnine;
Welcomes the Commission's efforts to provide an effective political response to the difficulties of General Motors Europe and its suppliers by coordinating the efforts of the Member States concerned, including the organisation of the ministerial meeting held on 13 March 2009 and the search for an equitable and fair solution to the issue of intellectual property rights;
poziva Svet in Komisijo naj pospešita, poenostavita in povečata finančno podporo avtomobilski industriji, predvsem prek Evropske investicijske banke in z odobritvijo državnih jamstev za nizkoobrestna posojila; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj zahtevata poenostavitev upravnega postopka za zahtevke za posojilo; meni, da bi morala finančna podpora v obliki posojil oživiti povpraševanje po novih vozilih v korist gospodarske rasti, okolja in varnosti v cestnem prometu;
Calls on the Council and Commission to accelerate, simplify and increase financial support for the automotive industry, notably through the European Investment Bank (EIB), and by allowing State guarantees for low-interest loans; urges the Council and Commission to ask for a simplification of the administrative procedure for loan applications; considers that this financial support, notably via loans, should help to stimulate demand for new vehicles, to the benefit of economic growth, the environment and road safety;
vztraja, naj Evropska investicijska banka v zadostni meri upošteva mala in srednje velika podjetja, ki so povezana z avtomobilskim sektorjem, da bi ohranila dostop do posojil, in poziva države članice, naj povečajo posojilno zmožnost Evropske investicijske banke, da bi zadostili srednjeročnim finančnim potrebam avtomobilske industrije;
Insists that the EIB give sufficient attention to the SMEs connected to the automotive sector so that they maintain access to credit and urges Member States to increase the EIB's lending capacity in order to match the mid-term financial needs of the automotive industry;
poudarja potrebo po popolnem sodelovanju sindikatov pri potekajoči razpravi in prosi Komisijo, naj podpre pristen evropski socialni dialog za to industrijo, zlasti v okviru sedanje krize;
Underlines the need to fully include trade unions in the discussions in progress and asks the Commission to support a real European social dialogue for this industry, especially within the context of the current crises;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi uporabo razpoložljivih evropskih sredstev za delovna mesta (Kohezijski sklad, strukturni skladi, Socialni sklad ali Sklad za prilagoditev globalizaciji) v okviru uravnoteženega izvajanja vseh tako imenovanih prednostnih nalog lizbonske strategije ter omogoči, izboljša in pospeši dostop do teh skladov; meni, da bi ti skladi morali prispevati k programom zgodnjega usposabljanja in prekvalifikacije delavcev, kjer koli in kadar koli se uporablja omejitev delovnega časa;
Asks the Commission to ensure best use of the European Funds available in support of jobs, such as the Cohesion Fund, Structural Funds, Social Fund and Globalisation Adjustment Fund, within the context of the balanced implementation of all the 'Lisbon priorities' and to facilitate, improve and speed up access to such Funds; considers that those Funds should contribute to training and retraining schemes for workers at an early stage, wherever and whenever working-time restrictions are to be applied;
ponovno opozarja, da potrebuje avtomobilska industrija stalna vlaganja v programe raziskav in razvoja, ki dajejo najboljše rezultate na področju kakovosti, varnosti in prijaznosti do okolja za doseganje trajno konkurenčnega okvira, ter zato poziva Komisijo, naj olajša, izboljša in pospeši dostop do instrumentov pomoči EU za raziskave in razvoj ter inovacije, kot je Sedmi okvirni program za raziskave in tehnološki razvoj;
Reaffirms that the automotive industry needs continuous investment in R&D programmes delivering the best possible solutions for quality, safety and environmental performance to achieve a sustainable competitive framework, and therefore invites the Commission in that context to facilitate, improve and speed up the access to EU support instruments for R&D and innovation, such as the Seventh Framework Programme for research and technological development;
potrjuje potrebo po poglobitvi dialoga in potekajočih razprav s tretjimi državami in glavnimi trgovinskimi partnerji EU o prihodnosti avtomobilske panoge ter zato poziva Komisijo, naj skrbno spremlja razmere v državah, ki niso članice EU, namreč v Združenih državah Amerike in Aziji, da bi zagotovila enake pogoje delovanja na mednarodni ravni, pri čemer se vse strani vzdržijo protekcionističnih in diskriminatornih ukrepov na svetovnem avtomobilskem trgu;
Confirms the need to deepen the dialogue and on-going discussions with third countries and the main EU trading partners on the future of the automotive sector, and calls therefore on the Commission to monitor closely developments in non-EU countries, notably in the United States and Asia, to guarantee a level playing-field at international level, refraining from protectionism and discriminatory measures in the global automotive market;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi uravnotežen in pošten dogovor med Evropsko unijo in Južno Korejo še pred sprejetjem prostotrgovinskega sporazuma;
Calls on the Commission to secure a balanced and fair deal between the European Union and South Korea before the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement;
pozdravlja proces CARS 21, ki določa dolgoročno industrijsko politiko na evropski ravni; poziva Komisijo, naj neprekinjeno izvaja, nadzoruje in pregleduje ta dolgoročni strateški načrt, da bi zagotovili konkurenčnost evropske avtomobilske industrije v prihodnosti in trajnostno zaposlovanje;
Welcomes the CARS 21 process, which sets out a long-term industrial policy at European level; calls on the Commission to continually implement, monitor and review this long-term strategy plan with a view to ensuring the future competitiveness of and sustainable employment in the European automotive industry;
poziva Komisijo, naj v celoti upošteva načela o boljši pravni ureditvi in izvede podrobno oceno vpliva prihodnje zakonodaje Skupnosti na motorna vozila v skladu s priporočili CARS 21 ter avtomobilski panogi zagotovi pravno varnost in predvidljivost;
Calls on the Commission to fully apply better regulation principles and therefore to carry out a thorough assessment of the impact of future Community legislation on motor vehicles, in line with the recommendations of CARS 21, thus ensuring legal certainty and predictability in the automotive sector;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 26. marca 2009 o Beli knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ( 2008/2154(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 26 March 2009 on the White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules ( 2008/2154(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Bele knjige Komisije z dne 2. aprila 2008 o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES ( KOM(2008)0165 ) (Bela knjiga),
having regard to the Commission White Paper of 2 April 2008 on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules ( COM(2008)0165 ) (White Paper),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 25. aprila 2007 o Zeleni knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. marca 2007 z naslovom "Strategija potrošniške politike EU 2007–2013: Usposabljanje potrošnikov, izboljševanje blaginje potrošnikov, učinkovito varstvo potrošnikov" ( KOM(2007)0099 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 13 March 2007 on EU Consumer Policy strategy 2007-2013: empowering consumers, enhancing their welfare, effectively protecting them ( COM(2007)0099 ),
ter Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 139/2004 z dne 20. januarja 2004 o nadzoru koncentracij podjetij (Uredba ES o združitvah) UL L 24, 29.1.2004, str.
and Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju obvestila Komisije o imuniteti pred globami in znižanju glob v kartelnih zadevah UL C 298, 8.12.2006, str.
having regard to the Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases OJ C 298, 8.12.2006, p.
in Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. 622/2008 z dne 30. junija 2008 UL L 171, 1.7.2008, str.
and Commission Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 of 30 June 2008 OJ L 171, 1.7.2008, p.
glede vodenja postopkov poravnave v kartelnih zadevah,
on the conduct of settlement procedures in cartel cases,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve in mnenj Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0123/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0123/2009 ),
ker konkurenčna politika izboljšuje gospodarsko storilnost Evropske unije in pomembno prispeva k doseganju ciljev lizbonske strategije,
whereas competition policy enhances the European Union's economic performance and makes a decisive contribution towards the achievement of the Lisbon Strategy goals,
ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti odločilo, da posamezniki in podjetja lahko sprožijo postopke za odškodnino zaradi škode, ki so jo utrpeli zaradi kršitev konkurenčnih pravil ES, s čimer bo zagotovljena popolna učinkovitost člena 81 Pogodbe,
whereas the Court of Justice of the European Communities has ruled, with a view to guaranteeing the full effectiveness of Article 81 of the Treaty, that individuals and undertakings may bring proceedings for damages for a breach of the EC competition rules,
ker so odškodninske tožbe le del učinkovitega sistema zasebnega izvrševanja in ker so mehanizmi alternativnega reševanja sporov v primernih okoliščinah učinkovita alternativa kolektivnim pravnim sredstvom ter ponujajo pravično in hitro izvensodno poravnavo in jih je treba spodbujati,
whereas actions for damages are only one element of an effective system of private enforcement and whereas alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are, in appropriate circumstances, an efficient alternative to collective redress mechanisms, offer fair and quick out-of-court settlements, and should be encouraged,
ker vprašanja iz bele knjige zajemajo vse vrste žrtev, vse vrste kršitev členov 81 in 82 Pogodbe ES ter vse gospodarske sektorje,
whereas the issues addressed in the White Paper concern all categories of victim, all types of breach of Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty, and all sectors of the economy,
ker bi morali vsi predlogi za uvedbo mehanizmov kolektivnih pravnih sredstev za kršitve pravil o konkurenci ES spremljati in ne nadomestiti alternativne oblike zaščite, ki že obstaja v nekaterih državah članicah (kot so reprezentativne tožbe in testni primeri),
whereas any proposal to introduce collective redress mechanisms for breaches of the EC competition rules should accompany, and not replace, the alternative forms of protection which already exist in some Member States (such as representative actions and test cases);
ker mora biti namen zasebnih odškodninskih tožb popolno nadomestilo žrtvi za utrpelo škodo in ker je treba spoštovati načela nepogodbene odgovornosti, ki prepovedujejo nepošteno bogatenje in večkratno povračilo škode na eni strani ter preprečujejo kazensko odškodnino na drugi strani,
whereas the aim of private-law actions for damages must be to compensate the victim fully for the harm suffered and whereas the principles of non-contractual liability that prohibit unjust enrichment and multiple recovery of compensation on the one hand, and that avoid punitive damages on the other must be respected,
čeprav je izvajanje konkurenčnega prava s strani Komisije in nacionalnih organov za konkurenco držav članic urejeno javnopravno in čeprav so zasebne odškodninske tožbe pred nacionalnimi sodnimi organi redke, so nekatere države članice že oziroma še bodo sprejele ukrepe, s katerimi bodo posameznikom olajšale uveljavljanje odškodninskih tožb v primeru kršitev konkurenčnih pravil ES,
whereas the enforcement of competition law by the Commission and Member States' competition authorities falls within the scope of public law and whereas relatively few private actions for damages are brought before national courts although several Member States have taken, or will take, measures to facilitate the prosecution of actions for damages by private individuals in the event of a breach of the EC competition rules,
ker lahko odškodninske tožbe dopolnjuje in podpirajo javno izvrševanje konkurenčnega prava, ne morejo pa ga nadomestiti, in je treba povečati zmogljivosti organov za varstvo konkurence glede osebja in finančnih sredstev, da bi bilo mogoče učinkoviteje spremljati kršitve konkurenčnega prava ES,
whereas bringing private actions for damages should complement and support, but not replace, the enforcement of competition law by the competition authorities and whereas the staffing and funding of the competition authorities must be boosted, so that breaches of the EC competition rules can be prosecuted more effectively,
ne glede na to, kako je rešen spor, je bistveno, da so vzpostavljeni postopki in nadzorni ukrepi za zagotovitev, da sta obe strani pošteno obravnavani, hkrati pa je treba preprečiti zlorabe sistema, kakršne so se pojavile v drugih pravnih sistemih, zlasti v Združenih državah,
whereas no matter how a dispute is resolved, it is essential that procedures and safeguards are put in place to ensure that all parties receive fair treatment and that, at the same time, there is no abuse of that system, such as has occurred in other legal systems, in particular in the United States;
ker mora v povezavi s kakršnim koli predlogom, ki ne spada pod izključno pristojnost Skupnosti, Komisija spoštovati načela subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti,
whereas with regard to any proposal that does not fall within the exclusive competence of the Community, the Commission must respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality,
pozdravlja belo knjigo in poudarja, da konkurenčna pravila ES in zlasti njihovo uspešno izvrševanje zahtevajo, da morajo imeti žrtve kršitev konkurenčnega prava ES možnost zahtevati povračilo za utrpelo škodo;
Welcomes the White Paper and stresses that the EC competition rules and, in particular, their effective enforcement, require that victims of breaches of the EC competition rules must be able to claim compensation for the damage suffered;
ugotavlja, da Komisija še ni opredelila pravne podlage za predlagane ukrepe in da je potrebna nadaljnja obravnava o opredelitvi pravne podlage za načrtovano posredovanje v nacionalne postopke za nepogodbene odškodnine in v nacionalno procesno pravo;
Notes that the Commission has not so far specified a legal basis for its proposed measures, and that further consideration must be given to identifying a legal basis for the proposed interventions into national proceedings for non-contractual damages and national procedural law;
meni, da do nekaterih ovir za učinkovita pravna sredstva za žrtve kršitev konkurenčnega prava ES, kot so množične in razpršene škode, asimetrije informacij in drugih težav pri uveljavljanju odškodninskih tožb, ne prihaja le v postopkih glede konkurenčnega prava ES, pač pa tudi na področjih, kot je na primer odgovornost za izdelke in druge s potrošniki povezane zadeve;
Takes the view that several obstacles to effective redress for victims of breaches of the EC competition rules, such as mass and dispersed damage, information asymmetries and other problems encountered in prosecuting actions for damages, occur not only in proceedings relating to EC competition law, but also in areas such as product liability and other consumer-related actions;
opozarja, da so posamezni potrošniki, pa tudi mala podjetja, zlasti tisti, ki so utrpeli razpršeno škodo in škodo v relativno nizki vrednosti, pogosto odvrnjeni od vložitve individualnih odškodninskih tožb zaradi z njimi povezanih stroškov, zamud, negotovosti, tveganj in ovir; glede tega poudarja, da so kolektivna pravna sredstva, ki omogočajo združitev posameznih odškodninskih tožb za kršitev konkurenčnega prava ES in povečujejo možnost žrtev do dostopa do pravne varnosti, pomembno orodje za odvračanje; zato pozdravlja predlog Komisije, naj se uvedejo mehanizmi za izboljšanje kolektivnih pravnih sredstev in za preprečevanje preštevilnih sodnih procesov;
Recalls that individual consumers but also small businesses, especially those who have suffered dispersed and relatively low-value damage, are often deterred from bringing individual actions for damages by the costs, delays, uncertainties, risks and burdens involved; stresses, in this context, that collective redress, which allows the aggregation of individual actions for damages for breaches of the EC competition rules and enhances victims' ability to obtain access to justice, is an important deterrent; welcomes, in this respect, the Commission's proposals that mechanisms be set up to improve collective redress while avoiding excessive litigation;
opozarja, da je generalni direktorat za zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov konec leta 2008 objavil rezultate dveh študij o mehanizmih kolektivnih pravnih sredstev v državah članicah in morebitnih ovirah za notranji trg, ki so posledica razlik v zakonodaji držav članic; hkrati poudarja, da je Komisija objavila zeleno knjigo o morebitnih možnostih Skupnosti za tožbe na področju zakonodaje za varstvo potrošnikov in napovedala objavo naslednjega strateškega dokumenta za leto 2009; poudarja, da ukrepi na ravni Skupnosti ne smejo neomejeno ali nepotrebno razdrobiti nacionalnega procesnega prava ter da je treba zato skrbno proučiti, ali naj se izbere horizontalen ali enoten pristop, pa tudi v kolikšni meri, da bi olajšali izvensodne poravnave in uveljavljanje odškodninskih tožb; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, naj se loti preverjanja možne pravne podlage in načina ukrepanja po horizontalnem ali enotnem pristopu, čeprav ne nujno z enim samim horizontalnim instrumentom, ter naj medtem ne oblikuje mehanizma kolektivnih pravnih sredstev za žrtve kršitev konkurenčnega prava ES, ne da bi Parlamentu dopustila, da sodeluje pri sprejemanju tega mehanizma v postopku soodločanja;
Points out that at the end of 2008 the Commission's Directorate General on Health and Consumers published the results of two studies on collective redress mechanisms in the Member States and possible barriers to the internal market resulting from Member States' differing legislation; points out also that the Commission published a green paper on the Community's possible options for action in the field of consumer protection law and has announced the publication of another policy paper in 2009; stresses that measures at Community level must not lead to arbitrary or unnecessary fragmentation of procedural national laws and that, therefore, careful consideration should be given to whether, and if so to what extent, a horizontal or integrated approach should be chosen to facilitate out-of-court settlements and the prosecution of actions for damages; calls on the Commission, therefore, to undertake an examination of the possible legal bases and how to proceed in a horizontal or integrated way though not necessarily with a single horizontal instrument, and to refrain, in the meantime, from presenting any collective redress mechanism for victims of breaches of the EC competition rules without allowing Parliament to participate in the adoption of such a mechanism in the course of the codecision procedure;
ugotavlja, da je treba odškodninske tožbe za kršitve konkurenčnega prava ES obravnavati kolikor je mogoče v skladu z drugimi nepogodbenimi zahtevki; meni, da bi horizontalni ali enotni pristop lahko vključeval postopkovna pravila, ki so skupna mehanizmom kolektivnih pravnih sredstev na različnih zakonskih področjih, ter poudarja, da ta pristop ne sme ovirati ali preprečevati razvoja predlogov in ukrepov, ki so potrebni za polno izvrševanje konkurenčnega prava ES; je nadalje seznanjen z naprednejšo analizo civilnih sredstev na področju konkurenčnega prava ter naprednim okvirom organov za konkurenco, vključno z evropsko mrežo za konkurenco, ter meni, da to vsaj za nekatera vprašanja upravičuje hitro napredovanje ob upoštevanju, da se lahko nekateri predvideni ukrepi razširijo na nekonkurenčna področja; meni, da bi se tovrstni sektorski ukrepi lahko že predlagala glede na posebne zapletenosti in težave, s katerimi se soočajo žrtve kršitev konkurenčnega prava ES;
Notes that actions for damages for breaches of the EC competition rules should be treated consistently with other non-contractual claims in so far as possible, is of the opinion that a horizontal or integrated approach could cover procedural rules that are common to collective redress mechanisms in different areas of law, and stresses that this approach must not delay or avoid the development of proposals and measures identified as necessary for the full enforcement of EC competition law; notes, furthermore, the more advanced analysis of civil competition law redress and the advanced framework for competition authorities, including the European Competition Network, and that, at least in regard to some issues, this justifies moving forward rapidly, taking into account that some of the measures envisaged could be extended to non-competition law sectors; takes the view that such sectoral measures could already be proposed with regard to the particular complexities and difficulties encountered by victims of breaches of the EC competition rules;