natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Spodbujanje uravnotežene zastopanosti spolov v politiki v zunanjih odnosih je eden od ciljev tega poročila, saj je pogoj za stabilnost in preglednost demokracije.
Promotion of gender balanced representation in politics in external relations is one of the aims of this report, as a condition for stable and transparent democracies.
Boj proti socialni izključenosti žensk iz političnega življenja bi moral biti eden od vidikov, ki ga je treba upoštevati v zunanjih odnosih EU, pri čemer je treba sodelovati z drugimi mednarodnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi na tem področju ter zagotoviti dovolj finančne in tehnične podpore.
Fighting against marginalisation of women in political life should be one of the aspects to be taken into account in the external relations of the EU, in cooperation with other international stakeholders operating in this field and complemented by an adequate financial and technical support.
Regina Bastos, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Iratxe García Pérez, Mikael Gustafsson, Mary Honeyball, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Rodi Kraca-Cagaropulu (Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou), Constance Le Grip, Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Antonija Prvanova (Antonyia Parvanova), Raül Romeva i Rueda, Joanna Senyszyn, Marc Tarabella, Angelika Werthmann, Marina Yannakoudakis
Regina Bastos, Emine Bozkurt, Andrea Češková, Marije Cornelissen, Iratxe García Pérez, Mikael Gustafsson, Mary Honeyball, Lívia Járóka, Teresa Jiménez-Becerril Barrio, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Silvana Koch-Mehrin, Rodi Kratsa-Tsagaropoulou, Constance Le Grip, Astrid Lulling, Barbara Matera, Elisabeth Morin-Chartier, Antonyia Parvanova, Raül Romeva i Rueda, Joanna Senyszyn, Marc Tarabella, Angelika Werthmann, Marina Yannakoudakis
Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Anne Delvaux, Christa Klaß, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Katarína Neveďalová, Antigoni Papadopulu (Antigoni Papadopoulou), Sirpa Pietikäinen, Rovana Plumb
Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Anne Delvaux, Christa Klaß, Mariya Nedelcheva, Katarína Neveďalová, Antigoni Papadopoulou, Sirpa Pietikäinen, Rovana Plumb
o smernicah za proračunski postopek za leto 2013, oddelek I – Evropski parlament, oddelek II – Svet, oddelek IV – Sodišče, oddelek V – Računsko sodišče, oddelek VI – Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor, oddelek VII – Odbor regij, oddelek VIII – Evropski varuh človekovih pravic, oddelek IX – Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov, oddelek X – Evropska služba za zunanje delovanje
on the guidelines for the 2013 budget procedure, Section I – European Parliament, Section II – Council, Section IV – Court of Justice, Section V – Court of Auditors, Section VI – European Economic and Social Committee, Section VII – Committee of the Regions, Section VIII – European Ombudsman, Section IX – European Data Protection Supervisor, Section X – European External Action Service
Poročevalec: Derek Vaughan
Rapporteur: Derek Vaughan
UL L 4, 7.1.2012, str.
OJ L 4, 7.1.2012, p.12. ,
UL C 326, 10.11.2011. ,
OJ C 326, 10.11.2011. ,
– ob upoštevanju členov 23 in 79 svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rules 23 and 79 of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0030/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0030/2012 ),
A. ker zgornja meja za razdelek 5 večletnega finančnega okvira (VFO) za proračun EU v letu 2013 znaša 9.181 milijonov EUR v tekočih cenah
A. whereas the ceiling for Heading 5 of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) for the EU’s budget in 2013 is EUR 9 181 million in current prices
Zgornja meja razdelka 5 vključuje prispevek zaposlenih za pokojninsko shemo. ;
The Heading 5 ceiling includes the staff contribution to the retirement scheme ;
B. ker bo pristop Hrvaške vplival na proračun za leto 2013, zlasti glede sredstev za nove poslance in zaposlovanja osebja v institucijah;
B. whereas Croatia’s accession will have an impact on the 2013 budget, namely as regards resources for new Members and staff recruitment across the institutions;
C. ker bi morali Evropski parlament in vse institucije ob upoštevanju težkega bremena javnega dolga in omejevanja v času nacionalnih prizadevanj za proračunsko konsolidacijo, ki so v teku, pokazati proračunsko odgovornost in samodisciplino; ob upoštevanju pisma, ki ga je 23. januarja 2012 predsednikom evropskih institucij poslal komisar Lewandowski;
C. whereas in a context of a heavy burden of public debt and of restraint in times of ongoing national budgetary consolidation efforts the European Parliament, and all institutions, should show budgetary responsibility and self-restraint; noting the letter dated 23 January 2012 from Commissioner Lewandowski to the Presidents of the European Institutions;
D. ker Parlament v tej fazi letnega postopka čaka na načrte prihodkov in odhodkov drugih institucij in na predloge svojega predsedstva glede proračuna za leto 2013;
D. whereas at this stage of the annual procedure, Parliament is awaiting the other institutions’ estimates and its own Bureau’s proposals for the 2013 budget;
1. meni, da bi morale institucije ob nadaljevanju gospodarskih razmer, ki so velik izziv, zamrzniti svoje upravne proračune; vendar poudarja, da je treba spoštovati pravno zavezujoče obveznosti in morebitno povečanje sredstev, ki je s tem povezano;
Believes that the institutions, in the context of continued challenging economic circumstances, should freeze their administrative budgets; emphasises, however, the need to respect legally binding obligations and possible subsequent increases;
7. meni, da bi bilo treba upoštevati neodvisno oceno proračuna EP, da bi dosegli občutne dolgoročne prihranke; meni, da bi bilo smiselno razmisliti o ustanovitvi delovne skupine; poziva generalnega sekretarja in predsedstvo, naj pripravita konkretne predloge za čimprejšnje oblikovanje tovrstne skupine ter najpozneje do konca leta 2012 predlagata prihranke, ki jih je mogoče ustvariti; prav tako zahteva, da se vsi zaključki skupine hitro prenesejo v prakso;
Believes that, in order to make significant long-term savings, an independent evaluation of the EP budget should be considered; believes the setting up of a working group should be considered; calls on the Secretary-General and the Bureau to come forward with concrete proposals on the establishment of such a group as soon as possible and to propose possible savings by no later than the end of 2012; also calls for the speedy impleme n tation of any conclusions reached by the group.
10. meni, da varčevanje ne bi smelo ogroziti zakonodajne dejavnosti EP; prepričan je, da se zakonodajne dejavnosti poslancev lahko okrepijo z dokončanjem sistema za upravljanje znanja; pozdravlja informacije, ki jih je podala uprava, zahteva posodobljene informacije o trenutnem stanju projektov in pričakuje, da bo sistem v celoti deloval in da bo dostopen državljanom EU; zahteva, da se okrepijo prizadevanja za pospešitev izvedbe tega projekta; ponavlja svojo zahtevo po informacijah o tem, kako bo mogoče ustvariti prihranke po začetku izvajanju sistema za upravljanje znanja;
Believes that savings should not jeopardise the legislative activity of the EP; is convinced that Members’ legislative activities can be enhanced by the completion of the knowledge management system (KMS); welcomes the information provided by the Administration, requests updated information on the state of play of the project and expects the system to be fully operational and accessible to EU citizens ;calls for increased efforts to speed up the implementation of this project; recalls its request for information regarding how savings can be made following the implementation of the KMS;
13. je seznanjen z zahtevo Evropskega sodišča (oddelek IV) po spremembi njegovega statuta na način, ki bo neposredno vplival na proračun; meni, da bi bilo treba zagotoviti potrebno financiranje za zagotavljanje nemotenega delovanja institucije in torej ustreznega sodnega varstva državljanov EU;
Takes note of the European Court of Justice’s (Section IV) request to amend its Statute in a way which will have a direct impact on the budget; considers that the necessary financing shall be ensured in order to guarantee the smooth running of the institution and consequently a proper judicial protection of EU citizens;
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembah Direktive 2000/75/ES glede cepljenja proti bolezni modrikastega jezika
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2000/75/EC as regards vaccination against bluetongue
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta v prvi obravnavi (16696/1/2011 – C7‑0011/2012 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (16696/1/2011 – C7‑0011/2012 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 15. marca 2011
– having regard to the opinion of European Economic and Social Committee of 15 March 2011
Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2011)0147 . o predlogu Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2010)0666 ),
Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0147 . on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0666 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0031/2012 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0031/2012 ),
Liam Aylward, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Paolo De Castro, Albert Deß, Herbert Dorfmann, Hynek Fajmon, Martin Häusling, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Jarosław Kalinowski, Elisabeth Köstinger, Stéphane Le Foll, George Lyon, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Marija Nedelčeva (Mariya Nedelcheva), Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Georgios Papastamkos, Marit Paulsen, Britta Reimers, Ulrike Rodust, Giancarlo Scottà, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
Liam Aylward, Luis Manuel Capoulas Santos, Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă, Paolo De Castro, Albert Deß, Herbert Dorfmann, Hynek Fajmon, Martin Häusling, Esther Herranz García, Elisabeth Jeggle, Jarosław Kalinowski, Elisabeth Köstinger, Stéphane Le Foll, George Lyon, Gabriel Mato Adrover, Mariya Nedelcheva, Wojciech Michał Olejniczak, Georgios Papastamkos, Marit Paulsen, Britta Reimers, Ulrike Rodust, Giancarlo Scottà, Czesław Adam Siekierski, Marc Tarabella, Janusz Wojciechowski
o stališču Sveta iz prve obravnave z namenom sprejetja Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi uredb Sveta (ES) št. 1290/2005 in (ES) št. 1234/2007 glede razdeljevanja prehrambnih proizvodov najbolj ogroženim osebam v Uniji
on the Council position at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards distribution of food products to the most deprived persons in the Union
– ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta v prvi obravnavi (18733/1/2011 – C7‑0022/2012 ),
– having regard to the Council position at first reading (18733/1/2011 – C7‑0022/2012 ),
– ob upoštevanju obrazloženih mnenj danskega parlamenta, švedskega parlamenta in lordske zbornice Združenega kraljestva v okviru Protokola (št. 2) o uporabi načel subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti, v katerem izjavljajo, da osnutek zakonodajnega akta ni v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti,
– having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of the Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Danish Parliament, Swedish Parliament and the United Kingdom House of Lords, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity,
– ob upoštevanju mnenj Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 20. januarja 2011
– having regard to the opinions of the European Economic and Social Committee of 20 January 2011
UL C 84, 17.3.2011, str 49. in 8. decembra 2011
OJ C 84, 17.3.2011, p.49 and 8 December 2011
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Odbora regij z dne 27. januarja 2011
– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 27 January 2011
– ob upoštevanju svojega stališča z dne 26. marca 2009
– having regard to its position of 26 March 2009
UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.258. ,
– ob upoštevanju spremenjenih predlogov Komisije ( COM(2010)0486 in COM(2011)0634 ),
– having regard to the amended Commission proposals ( COM(2010)0486 ) and COM(2011)0634 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila za drugo obravnavo Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0032/2012 )
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0032/2012 ),
Poročevalec Parlamentu predlaga, naj brez predlogov sprememb sprejme stališče Sveta iz prve obravnave, sprejetega 23. januarja 2012.
Your rapporteur suggests that the Parliament should accept without amendments the Council position at first reading adopted on 23 January 2012.
Glede na nujnost zadeve zaradi dveletnega blokiranja predloga v Svetu poročevalec meni, da bi vsako zavlačevanje zaradi vlaganja predlogov sprememb in s tem morebitnega dolgotrajnega postopka druge obravnave le še podaljšalo stisko najbolj prikrajšanih državljanov EU, ki bi jim program razdeljevanja hrane koristil.
Given the urgent situation created by the blocking of the proposal at the Council for two years, your rapporteur considers that any delay linked to the tabling of amendments and, as a consequence, a possible lengthy second reading procedure would only cause longer suffering to the most deprived EU citizens who could benefit from the food distribution programme.
Poleg tega je treba upoštevati, da so vsi bistveni predlogi sprememb Evropskega parlamenta iz prve obravnave že zajeti v spremenjenem predlogu Komisije z dne 3. oktobra 2011 in obravnavanem stališču Sveta.
Moreover, it has to be taken into account that the amended Commission proposal of 3 October 2011 and the Council position under consideration have taken over all substantial EP amendments at first reading.
In sicer:
In particular:
– Program bo še naprej v celoti financirala Unija.
- full Union's funding for the programme is maintained.
Sedanja stopnja 100-odstotnega financiranja programa s sredstvi EU se ohrani, predvidena pa je letna zgornja meja finančnega prispevka Unije v višini 500 milijonov EUR, da se zagotovi proračunska stabilnost.
The current rate of 100% EU funding is retained for the future but, in order to ensure its budgetary stability, an annual ceiling of € 500 million for the Union's financial contribution is foreseen;
– Druge bistvene spremembe, ki jih je predlagal Parlament, so bile vsebinsko sprejete: pojem hrane s poreklom iz Unije; obveznost, da se na razdelilnih mestih jasno navede sodelovanje Unije v načrtu; obveznost nakupa prehrambnih proizvodov na podlagi konkurenčnih postopkov; povračilo stroškov skladiščenja, ki nastanejo dobrodelnim organizacijam.
- other substantial changes suggested by EP amendments have been accepted in their essence, namely: the notion of the Union origin of the foods; the obligation for distribution points to clearly display the participation of the Union in the plan; purchase of food products to be made on the basis of competitive procedures; reimbursement of storage costs incurred by charitable organisations.
Kratek opis okoliščin
Short background information
Prvotni predlog Komisije je bil sprejet 17. septembra 2008.
The original Commission proposal was adopted on 17 September 2008.
Parlament ga je sprejel v prvi obravnavi 26. marca 2009 (po takrat veljavnem postopku posvetovanja) na podlagi poročila Czesława Adama Siekierskega, ki je zajemal 20 predlogov sprememb.
Parliament adopted its first reading on 26 March 2009 (under the consultation procedure applying at that time) on the basis of the report by Mr. Siekierski containing 20 amendments.
Komisija je nato v prvem spremenjenem predlogu vključila pomembne predloge sprememb Evropskega parlamenta, kot je na primer popolno financiranje s sredstvi EU.
The Commission has subsequently taken over, in a first amended proposal, important EP amendments, such as the full financing by the EU.
Vendar je Svet z manjšino, ki lahko prepreči sprejetje odločitve, dve leti blokiral predlog.
However, the proposal has remained blocked at the Council for two years, due to a blocking minority.
Zato je Komisija 3. oktobra 2011 po rednem zakonodajnem postopku sprejela drugi spremenjeni predlog, ki je zdaj v obravnavi.
For that reason, the Commission adopted on 3 October 2011, under the ordinary legislative procedure, its second amended proposal which is now under consideration.
Svet je 14. novembra 2011 ponovno razpravljal o zadevi in ugotovil, da ni manjšine, ki lahko prepreči sprejetje odločitve.
On 14 November 2011, the Council discussed the matter again and noted the absence of a blocking minority.
V posebnem odboru za kmetijstvo se je 12. decembra 2011 dogovoril o kompromisnem stališču, katerega glavni elementi so:
In the Special Committee for Agriculture (SCA) of 12 December 2011, the Council agreed on a compromise position whose main elements were:
– sedanja shema naj se ohrani le v letih 2012 in 2013 ter se po zaključku letnega načrta 2013 postopoma odpravi;
- the current scheme should be continued only in 2012 and 2013 and should be phased out after the completion of the 2013 annual plan;
– retroaktivnost: uredba bi se morala uporabljati od 1. januarja 2012 do dokončanja letnega načrta za leto 2013;
- retroactivity: the Regulation should apply already since 1 January 2012 until the completion of the 2013 annual plan;
– izjemoma naj ne bi bilo prilagoditev Lizbonski pogodbi (na primer člena 290 in 291 PDEU o delegiranih in izvedbenih aktih se ne uporabljata);
- exceptionally, there should be no Lisbon alignment (i.e. non application of Articles 290, 291 TFEU on delegated and implementing acts);
– dodatno pravno podlago o socialni koheziji (člen 175(3) PDEU), ki jo je vključila Komisija v svoj spremenjen predlog, bi bilo treba črtati.
- the additional legal base on social cohesion (Article 175 (3) TFEU), which had been inserted by the Commission in its amended proposal, should be deleted.
Ta kompromis je Svet potrdil z uradnim sprejetjem svojega stališča v prvi obravnavi 23. januarja 2012.
This compromise was confirmed by the formal adoption by the Council of its position at first reading on 23 January 2012.
Sprejeto stališče Sveta v celoti odraža omenjeni kompromis, o katerem se je dogovoril 12. decembra 2011.
The adopted Council position fully reflects the above-stated Council compromise agreed on 12 December 2011.
Sklepni predlogi
Final suggestions
Poročevalec poudarja, da Parlament nima dejanskega manevrskega prostora za obsežna pogajanja za spremembe stališča Sveta, saj je zadeva zaradi dveletnega blokiranja predloga v Svetu precej nujna.
The rapporteur would like to underline that Parliament has no real margin for an extensive negotiation in order to amend the Council position, given the particularly urgent situation created by the blocking of the proposal at the Council for two years.
Spomniti je tudi treba, da je Evropski parlament v resoluciji z dne 7. julija 2011 Komisijo in Svet pozval, naj pripravita prehodno rešitev za preostala leta tekočega večletnega finančnega okvira ter tako preprečita drastično zmanjšanje pomoči v hrani zaradi zmanjšanja sredstev s 500 milijonov EUR na 133 milijonov EUR in zagotovita, da se ljudje, odvisni od te pomoči, ne bodo znašli na robu preživetja.
It should also be reminded that Parliament, in its resolution of 7 July 2011, had called on the Commission and the Council to ''develop a transitional solution for the remaining years of the current MFF so as to avoid a sharp cutback in food aid as a result of the reduction in funding from € 500 million to € 113 million and ensure that people dependent on food aid do not suffer from food poverty''.
Pogajalska skupina Evropskega parlamenta je v tristranskih pogovorih 6. decembra 2011 v večini ugotovila, da mora glede na pojasnila predsedstva in predstavnikov Komisije v zvezi s pomanjkanjem boljše rešitve v teh posebej težkih razmerah privoliti v kompromis Sveta, saj je le tako mogoče doseči prehodno rešitev za preostala leta sedanjega večletnega finančnega okvira.
At a trilogue organised on 6 December 2011, the EP negotiating team recognised, in its majority, that in view of the explanations given by the Presidency and Commission representatives on the absence of a better solution in this particularly difficult situation, it saw itself obliged to agree to the Council compromise as the only means for achieving a transitional solution for the remaining years of the current MFF.
Poročevalec glede na te argumente, s katerimi se je 12. decembra 2011 na izredni seji odbora AGRI strinjala večina poslancev, predlaga, naj se stališče Sveta sprejme brez predlogov sprememb, da ga bo mogoče v tej obliki dokončno sprejeti na plenarnem zasedanju Evropskega parlamenta (v tako imenovani zgodnji drugi obravnavi).
In view of those arguments, also shared by the majority of Members at the AGRI special meeting of 12 December 2011, your rapporteur suggests that the Council position should be accepted without amendments, so that it can finally be adopted in its current form at the EP Plenary (as a so-called early second reading).
o načrtu za prehod na konkurenčno gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika do leta 2050
on a Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Pripravljavec mnenja(*):
Rapporteur for the opinion (*):
Mario Pirillo, Odbor za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko
Mario Pirillo, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy
(*) Postopek s pridruženimi odbori – člen 50 Poslovnika
(*) Associated committee - Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure
MNENJE Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja .......................................29
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ...28
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije „Načrt za prehod na konkurenčno gospodarstvo z nizkimi emisijami ogljika do leta 2050“ (COM(2011)112) ter priloženih delovnih dokumentov ( SEC(2011)0288 ) in ( SEC(2011)0289 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication ‘A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’ ( COM(2011)0112 ) and the accompanying working documents ( SEC(2011)0288 ) and ( SEC(2011)0289 ),
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 26. maja 2010 o analizi možnosti, da se preseže 20-odstotno zmanjšanje emisij toplogrednih plinov, ter oceni tveganja selitve industrijskih virov toplogrednih plinov izven EU ( COM(2010)0265 ) in spremnega dokumenta ( SEC(2010)0650 ),
– having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Analysis of options to move beyond 20% greenhouse gas emission reductions and assessing the risk of carbon leakage’ ( COM(2010)0265 ) and the accompanying document ( SEC(2010)0650 ),
– ob upoštevanju predlogov za prenovitev ( COM(2011)0656 ) in spremembo direktive o trgih finančnih instrumentov ( COM(2011)0652 ) ter direktive o zlorabi trga ( COM(2011)0651 ) v zvezi s pravicami do emisij v okviru sistema EU za trgovanje z emisijami,
– having regard to the proposals to recast ( COM(2011)0656 ) and amend the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) ( COM(2011)0652 ) and the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) ( COM(2011)0651 ) with regard to emission allowances under the EU’s ETS,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 23. oktobra 2011,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council meeting of 23 October 2011,
– ob upoštevanju člena 9 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (socialna klavzula),
– having regard to Article 9 TFEU (the 'social clause’),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varstvo hrane ter mnenj Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A7-0033/2012 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinions of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A7-0033/2012 ),