natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se strinja z Računskim sodiščem, da je dodeljevanje lokalnih dejavnosti in projektov odločilen dejavnik uspeha pri krepitvi pravne države in prav tako meni, da pomanjkanje predanosti in odgovornosti na lokalni ravni slabi trajnost projektov; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo pomoč pospremila močna volja upravičencev za spodbujanje institucionalnih reform, ter poveča sodelovanje upravičencev v projektih;
Agrees with the Court that the appropriation of local actions and projects represents a determining factor for success in strengthening the rule of law, and also considers that the lack of commitment and ownership at local level weakens the sustainability of the projects; calls on the Commission to ensure that the assistance provided is accompanied by a strong will on the part of the beneficiaries actively to encourage the institutional reforms and to increase the involvement of the beneficiaries in the projects;
enako kot Računsko sodišče meni, da je pomoč EU na Zahodnem Balkanu na splošno učinkovita, da pa je resnično tveganje povezano s trajnostjo projektov; z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da bi se morala v okviru instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč izboljšati trajnost in odgovornost, povezana s projekti zaradi pogojev projekta in sofinanciranja upravičencev; meni, da bi načrti za vzdrževanje še bolj povečali trajnost projektov, in prosi Komisijo, naj razmisli, da bi jih uvedla kot temeljni pogoj za pridobitev finančne podpore EU;
Considers, like the Court, that EU aid in the Western Balkans is generally effective, but that real risks exist regarding the sustainability of projects; notes with satisfaction that the sustainability and ownership of projects should improve under the IPA programme due to project conditionalities and co-financing by the beneficiaries; is of the opinion that maintenance plans would further increase the durability of projects, and asks the Commission to consider introducing them as a prerequisite for obtaining EU financial support;
od Komisije pričakuje, da bo dosledno zagotavljala, da bodo posegi, povezani z infrastrukturo na področju integriranega upravljanja na mejah, pripravljeni in izvedeni tako, da bodo spodbujali regionalno sodelovanje;
Expects the Commission to ensure scrupulously that interventions related to infrastructure in the field of the integrated management of the borders are now designed and implemented in such a way as to encourage regional cooperation;
poziva Komisijo, naj naredi vse, kar je v njeni moči, da bi zagotovila boljše sodelovanje med različnimi donatorji na kraju samem in učinkovitejše usklajevanje njihovih dejavnosti;
Calls on the Commission to do its utmost to ensure better cooperation between the various donors on the spot and more efficient coordination of their actions;
meni, da je treba znatno izboljšati prepoznavnost EU kot največjega donatorja v tej regiji, da bo ta sorazmerna z njenimi prispevki; čaka na predlog Komisije v zvezi s tem;
Considers that the visibility of the EU as the largest donor in the region needs to be significantly improved so as to match its share of contributions; awaits a proposal from the Commission in that regard;
poudarja, da je skladno z načeli prenosa Komisija še naprej odgovorna za politiko in nadzor dejavnosti;
Stresses that, in accordance with the principles of delegation, responsibility for policy and the supervision of activities remains with the Commission;
vendar obžaluje, da je revizija pokazala, da kontrola Komisije nad dejavnostmi agencij ni v celoti učinkovita, in poudarja, da je treba razviti nove kazalnike, s katerimi bodo nadzorni generalni direktorati lahko bolje merili uspešnost agencij;
Regrets, however, that according to the audit the Commission's control over the agencies‘ activities is not fully effective, and stresses the need to develop new indicators enabling the measurement of the Agencies’ performance by the supervisory DGs to be enhanced;
meni, da bi morale izvajalske agencije nastati ne samo zaradi kadrovskih omejitev, ampak zlasti zaradi izboljšanja storitev v programih, v katerih bi jasna razmejitev med politiko in izvajalskimi nalogami Komisiji omogočila, da svoja prizadevanja usmeri na strateška vprašanja;
Considers that the establishment of executive agencies should be motivated not only by staff constraints but mainly by the aim of improving service in programmes where a clear separation between policy and implementing tasks would enable the Commission to concentrate its efforts on strategic issues;
podpira namen Komisije, da do leta 2013 ne bo ustanavljala novih izvajalskih agencij, razen če ne bi dobila novih pristojnosti, ter da bo namesto tega raje uporabila možnost, da razširi obseg pristojnosti obstoječih agencij;
Supports the intention of the Commission not to set up additional executive agencies unless there are new Commission competencies up to 2013, and instead to make use of the possibility of extending the mandate of existing agencies;
ugotavlja, da je po poročilu Računskega sodišča praksa zaposlovanja v izvajalskih agencijah taka, da se zaposluje na nižjih stopnjah na začasnih delovnih mestih in da se od pogodbenega osebja pričakuje, da bo imelo več let delovnih izkušenj, kot velja za pogodbeno osebje, ki opravlja podobne naloge v Komisiji; opaža, da bi lahko bila delovna mesta zaradi tega manj privlačna kljub možnosti podaljšanja pogodb, medtem ko lahko osebje Komisije sklene pogodbe za največ tri leta, ter opaža, da bi lahko to posledično ogrozilo kakovost delovanja zadevnih izvajalskih agencij;
Notes that, according to the Court's report, the recruitment practice in the executive agencies is to hire at lower grades for temporary posts, and to require contract staff to have more years of experience, than is the case as regards contract staff with similar tasks in the Commission; notes that this might reduce the attractiveness of the job positions, despite the offer of renewable contracts in contrast to the maximum contract term of three years applicable to Commission contract staff, and notes that this could result in compromises in the quality of the operations of the executive agencies concerned;
zahteva od Komisije, da zagotovi informacije o različnih pogodbeno določenih rokih, ki se uporabljajo za različne pogodbene naloge in trajanje različnega pogodbenega zaposlovanja v izvajalskih agencijah;
Requests the Commission to provide information on the different contractual time periods applicable for the different contractual tasks and the duration of the different contractual employments in the executive agencies;
meni, da je ena glavnih morebitnih prednosti izvajalske agencije zaposlovanje specializiranega osebja, zato od Komisije zahteva, naj sprejme ukrepe za izboljšanje in poenostavljanje zaposlovanja osebja izvajalskih agencij; poleg tega zahteva od Komisije, da upošteva specifične potrebe pri zaposlovanju v izvajalskih agencijah;
Considers that one of the major potential benefits of an executive agency is the recruitment of specialised staff, and therefore requests the Commission to take measures to improve and simplify the recruitment of the agencies‘ staff; moreover, requests the Commission to take the specific recruitment needs of the executive agencies into consideration;
od Komisije zahteva, da predloži podrobne informacije o številu pogodbeno zaposlenega osebja v izvajalskih agencijah in nalogah, ki so jim bile dodeljene, ter o ustreznih ravneh plač, pa tudi pregled o tem, koliko izkušenj je potrebnih za posamezno zaposlitveno stopnjo; prav tako zahteva, da Komisija predloži informacije o različnih primerih, v katerih ni bilo mogoče hitro najti ustreznega osebja, in o tem, koliko zamud se je pojavilo pri zaposlovanju osebja, pa tudi analizo razlogov za zamudo;
Requests the Commission to present detailed information on the number of contract staff employed in the executive agencies and the tasks assigned to them and the salary levels corresponding thereto, as well as an overview on how much experience is required for each employment grade; moreover, requests the Commission to present information on the different cases in which suitable staff could not be rapidly found and on how much delay occurred in the staff recruitment, as well as an analysis of the reasons for the delay;
poziva Komisijo, naj upošteva priporočila Računskega sodišča in:
Invites the Commission to follow the recommendations of the Court and:
pridobi in uporabi zanesljive podatke o delovnem bremenu in učinkovitosti, ki sta povezana z dodelitvijo nalog, da bi izdelala oceno učinka pred eksternalizacijo in po njej;
to collect and use reliable data on workload and productivity related to the delegation of tasks with a view to carrying out an impact assessment, both before and after externalisation;
opredeli dejavnike uspeha in odločitev, ki so vodili do boljših rezultatov v najuspešnejših izvajalskih agencijah, ter uporabi pridobljene izkušnje v vseh programih, ki jih bodo upravljale službe Komisije;
to identify the success factors and conclusions which led to better results at the executive agencies and to apply the lessons learned to all programmes which continue to be managed by the Commission services;
izboljša nadzor nad agencijami z določitvijo ciljno usmerjenih rezultatov s pomočjo omejenega števila ustreznih kazalnikov uspešnosti, ki naj bodo podlaga za cilje v prihodnjih letih;
to improve the supervision of the agencies by setting results-oriented and targeted objectives, using a limited number of relevant performance indicators, which should form the basis for objectives in respect of coming years;
Posebno poročilo št. 14/2009 „Ali so instrumenti za upravljanje trga mleka in mlečnih izdelkov dosegli svoje glavne cilje?“
Special report No 14/2009 entitled ‘Have the management instruments applied to the market in milk and milk products achieved their main objectives?’
pričakuje, da bo Komisija glede na masivna nihanja in neskladnosti na svetovnem trgu sprejela učinkovite preventivne in izravnalne ukrepe za krepitev malih in srednje velikih podjetij in spodbudila oskrbo z živili z raznolikimi podjetji znotraj Evropske unije;
Expects the Commission, in view of the massive fluctuations and disparities on the world market, to take effective precautionary and compensatory measures to strengthen small and medium-sized businesses and to promote security of food supply through a wide range of businesses within the European Union;
opaža, da je Računsko sodišče zaskrbljeno zlasti zaradi posledic na gorskih območjih in območjih z omejenimi možnostmi; poudarja, da se tej skrbi pridružuje Parlament, saj so učinkovite kmetije sestavni del razvoja številnih podeželskih regij; meni, da imajo kmetije v številnih državah članicah ključni vpliv na razvoj, stabilnost in ohranitev kulturne krajine podeželskih območij;
Notes that the Court is particularly concerned about the consequences in mountain areas and less favoured areas; stresses that this concern is shared by Parliament, as efficient farms are an integral part of development in many rural regions; considers that farms in many Member States have a considerable impact on the development, stability and conservation of the countryside in rural areas;
se ne strinja z mnenjem, da bi se moral trg mleka EU v prvi vrsti osredotočiti na notranji trg; deli stališče Računskega sodišča, da bi se evropski sektor mleka v globalnem izvozu moral usmeriti v proizvodnjo mlečnih proizvodov z visoko dodano vrednostjo; poudarja tudi, da bi morala Komisija nameniti visoko pozornost pošteni konkurenci na svetovnem trgu brez dumpinga, da bi se s tem zoperstavila zapostavljanju in ekonomskemu uničevanju podjetij zaradi nenadnih nihanj v svetovni trgovini; zahteva financiranje primernih tržnih ukrepov in študij o tržnih raziskavah v neevropskih državah in opozarja, da se z izvozom kmetijskih proizvodov in spremljajočih tržnih ukrepov ne smejo uničiti kmetijske strukture ali njihova vzpostavitev v državah v razvoju;
Does not agree that the EU milk market should focus primarily on the internal market; but shares the Court of Auditors‘ view that in worldwide exports the European milk sector should be focused on the manufacture of milk products with high added value; also points out that the Commission should give a high priority to fair competition on the world market without dumping, so as to counteract the disadvantaging and financial annihilation of businesses by sudden fluctuations in world trade; calls for the funding of appropriate marketing measures and market research studies in countries outside Europe, and points out that agricultural structures or their creation in developing countries must not be destroyed by the export of agricultural goods and accompanying market measures;
se strinja z mnenjem Računskega sodišča, da je treba stalno nadzirati razvoj trga mleka, in zahteva upoštevanje priporočil Računskega sodišča, da se prepozna neustrezen razvoj, kadar se pojavi, in da se čim prej sprejme primerne protiukrepe;
Agrees with the Court that there is a need for continuing supervision of the development of the milk market, and calls for the Court's recommendations to be acted on, so as to identify inappropriate developments as they arise and counteract them with suitable measures at an early stage;
nadalje opozarja, da je treba izčrpno in temeljito razpravljati o ciljih SKP.
Points out, moreover, that a detailed and exhaustive debate is necessary on the objectives of the CAP.
Posebno poročilo št. 16/2009 o Komisijinem upravljanju predpristopne pomoči Turčiji
Special report No 16/2009 on the European Commission's management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey
pozdravlja uravnoteženo oceno Računskega sodišča o tem, kako Evropska komisija upravlja predpristopno pomoč Turčiji;
Welcomes the Court's sound assessment regarding the administration by the Commission of pre-accession assistance to Turkey;
ugotavlja, da Računsko sodišče kritizira, ker ni jasno določene metode izbire, ki bi zagotavljala, da izbrani projekti ustrezajo prednostnim nalogam partnerstva za pristop in pozdravlja ugotovitev Računskega sodišča, da čeprav je bilo v obdobju predpristopne pomoči Turčiji (2002–2006) nekaj slabosti pri tem, kako je Komisija upravljala to predpristopno pomoč, je od tedaj Komisija ukrepala za izboljšanje postopkov izvajanja instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, čeprav bo možno oceniti učinkovitost sprememb šele v prihodnosti;
Notes that the Court criticises the absence of a clear selection method which would ensure that the projects selected correspond to the priorities of the Accession Partnership, and welcomes the Court's conclusion that, while there were indeed some weaknesses in the Commission's management of pre-accession assistance to Turkey in the TPA period (i.e. 2002-2006), the Commission has since then taken action to improve procedures for the IPA, although the effectiveness of the changes can only be assessed in the future;
je pretresen zaradi zaključkov iz posebnega poročila, v katerem Računsko sodišče kritizira dejstvo, da Komisija ni zagotovila učinkovitega sistema ocenjevanja posameznih projektov v obdobju 2002–2008 in da zato ni lahko oceniti, kako so bila sredstva upravljana ter ali je bila dosežena stroškovna učinkovitost;
Is shocked at the conclusions of the special report, in which the Court of Auditors criticises the fact that the Commission did not ensure that there was an effective system for assessing individual projects in the period 2002-2008 and that it is therefore not easy to assess how the funds were managed, including whether value for money was obtained;
meni, da je zaskrbljujoče, da niti strateško načrtovanje 2002–2004 niti 236 „prednostnih nalog“ partnerstva za pristop ni vključevalo razvrstitve po pomembnosti, prav tako niso bili upoštevani ravni/ukrepi, potrebni za dosego napredka pri pristopu; kritizira očitno pomanjkanje učinkovite rabe evropske finančne pomoči; je razočaran, da med letoma 2006 in 2008 številne prednostne naloge, ki so bile označene kot „kratkoročne,“ niso dosegle pomembnejšega napredka;
Considers it worrying that the strategic planning for 2002-2004 as well as the 236 ‘priorities’ of the accession partnership in 2006 did not include any ranking in terms of importance or any consideration of the level/measures required concerning progress towards accession; criticises the obvious lack of efficient use of European financial aid; is disappointed that between 2006 and 2008 many priorities which were marked as ‘short-term’ did not achieve any significant progress;
poudarja, da je Sodišče pozvalo k odločnejši metodologiji, s katero se bodo določili strateški cilji, za katere je finančna pomoč EU najbolj nujna; meni, da je treba jasno opredeliti posamezne ukrepe za dosego vsakega strateškega cilja; od Komisije zahteva, da zagotovi, da bodo različni projektni predlogi vsebovali specifične, izmerljive, realistične in primerne cilje, tako da bo njihov prispevek vidno dosegal strateške cilje;
Underlines the Court's call for a robust methodology with which to determine the strategic objectives for which EU financial assistance is most needed; considers that the designated measures for achieving each strategic objective need to be clearly defined; requests the Commission to ensure that the various project proposals include specific, quantifiable, realistic and relevant objectives so that their contribution demonstrably achieves strategic objectives;
kritizira dejstvo, da so bila sredstva predpristopne pomoči dodeljena Turčiji kljub dejstvu, da so manjkali kazalniki in da napredka v zvezi z izpolnjevanjem predpristopnih meril ni bilo mogoče izmeriti; zato zahteva, da se sredstva usmeri v projekte, ki so pomembni za pristop, so dejansko izmerljivi in jih je mogoče izvesti;
Criticises the fact that pre-accession assistance funds were allocated to Turkey despite the fact that there were missing indicators and that progress towards fulfilment of the accession criteria could not be measured; therefore calls for funds to be concentrated on projects which are relevant to accession, actually measurable and capable of being implemented;
poudarja, da mora Komisija, čeprav je sprejela ukrepe, katerih namen je reševanje mnogih pomanjkljivosti v decentraliziranem izvajalskem sistemu, še zlasti od uvedbe novega instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč (IPA 2007–2013) dalje, še vedno reševati pomanjkljivosti, ki ostajajo v celotnem programiranju in učinkovitem upravljanju, kot je to priporočilo Računsko sodišče; prav tako pričakuje, da bo Komisija turške oblasti seznanila s tem dejstvom tako, da bodo oblikovani projektni predlogi, ki bodo omogočali doseganje strateških ciljev, povezanih s financiranjem Evropske unije, znotraj realnih časovnih okvirov; meni, da bi se morala Komisija lotiti novih pobud za izboljšanje namena in izvajanja projektov s strani institucij decentraliziranega izvajalskega sistema (ukrepi kot je denimo ocenjevanje obveznih potreb in boljše časovno načrtovanje pogodbenih dogovorov);
Points out that, even though the Commission has introduced measures aimed at addressing many of the weaknesses in the Decentralised Implementation System, in particular since the introduction of the new Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA 2007-2013), the Commission still has to address the remaining weaknesses in overall programming and performance management, as recommended by the Court; also expects the Commission to make the Turkish authorities aware of this fact so that project proposals are drawn up which would allow the strategic objectives relating to the financing of the European Union to be achieved within a realistic timescale; considers that the Commission should undertake new initiatives in order to improve the design and implementation of the projects by the institutions of the Decentralised Implementation System (measures such as compulsory needs assessments and better scheduling of contracting arrangements);
glede na nezmožnost merjenja napredka k pristopnim ciljem meni poziva Komisijo, naj opravi natančnejšo analizo ciljev in učinkovitosti instrumenta za predpristopno pomoč, temelječo na pripombah Evropskega računskega sodišča, ter jo predstavi do 15. septembra 2010;
Given the inability to measure progress towards accession goals; asks the Commission to carry out a more precise analysis of the goals and the efficiency of the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, based on the remarks of the Court of Auditors, and to present this by 15 September 2010;
opozarja, kako pomembno je, da Komisija oceni celoten program predpristopne pomoči Turčiji;
Recalls the importance of an evaluation by the Commission of the entirety of the programme for pre-accession assistance to Turkey.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta z dne 5. maja 2010 o razrešnici glede izvrševanja proračuna sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za proračunsko leto 2008 ( KOM(2009)0397 – C7-0171/2009 – 2009/2077(DEC) )
European Parliament decision of 5 May 2010 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds for the financial year 2008 ( COM(2009)0397 – C7-0171/2009 – 2009/2077(DEC) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o nadaljnjem ukrepanju na podlagi sklepov o razrešnicah za leto 2007 ( KOM(2009)0526 ) in njegove priloge ( SEK(2009)1427 ),
having regard to the Commission report on the follow-up to the 2007 discharge decisions ( COM(2009)0526 and its annex SEC(2009)1427 ),
ob upoštevanju letnih računovodskih izkazov in bilance odhodkov in prihodkov sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za proračunsko leto 2008 ( KOM(2009)0397 – C7-0171/2009 ),
having regard to the financial statements and revenue and expenditure accounts for the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds for the financial year 2008 ( COM(2009)0397 – C7-0171/2009 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila o finančnem poslovodenju sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za finančno leto 2008,
having regard to the report on the financial management of the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds for the financial year 2008,
ob upoštevanju finančnih informacij o Evropskih razvojnih skladih ( KOM(2009)0310 ),
having regard to the financial information on the European Development Funds ( COM(2009)0310 ),
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Računskega sodišča o dejavnostih sedmega, osmega, devetega in desetega Evropskega razvojnega sklada za proračunsko leto 2008 skupaj z odgovori Komisije UL C 269, 10.11.2009, str.
having regard to the Court of Auditors‘ annual report on the activities funded by the Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Tenth European Development Funds for the financial year 2008, together with the Commission's replies OJ C 269, 10.11.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju izjave o zanesljivosti poslovnih knjig ter zakonitosti in pravilnosti poslovnih dogodkov, ki jo predloži Računsko sodišče v skladu s členom 248 Pogodbe ES UL C 274, 13.11.2009, str.
having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty OJ C 274, 13.11.2009, p.
ob upoštevanju priporočil Sveta z dne 16. februarja 2010 o podelitvi razrešnice Komisiji glede izvajanja dejavnosti Evropskih razvojnih skladov za proračunsko leto 2008 (5082/2010 – C7-0056/2010 , 5084/2010 – C7-0057/2010 , 5085/2010 – C7-0058/2010 , 5086/2010 – C7-0059/2010 ),
having regard to the Council's recommendations of 16 February 2010 concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Funds for the financial year 2008 (5082/2010 – C7-0056/2010 , 5084/2010 – C7-0057/2010 , 5085/2010 – C7-0058/2010 , 5086/2010 – C7-0059/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju 23. junija 2000 UL L 317, 15.12.2000, str.
having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 OJ L 317, 15.12.2000, p.