natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
zato poudarja potrebo po ponovnih pogajanjih o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, da - če je to sprejemljivo z vidika obstoječe pogodbe - se premisli o splošnem priznanju, da mora biti trgovinska pogodba EU vsebina strožjega demokratičnega pregleda, kar se odraža v trgovinskih določbah okvirne lizbonske pogodbe; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pregledata in pojasnita medinstitucionalni sporazum, da se zagotovi celovito sodelovanje Parlamenta pri mednarodnih trgovinskih pogajanjih EU, ter se tako zlasti v skladu s členom 83 poslovnika Parlamenta zagotovi, da:
Draws attention, therefore, to the need to renegotiate the Interinstitutional Treaty in order to reflect, insofar as is compatible with the existing Treaty, the widespread recognition - reflected in the trade provisions of the draft Lisbon Treaty - that EU trade policy must be subject to more rigorous democratic scrutiny; calls on the Commission and Council to revise and clarify the IIA in order to establish full participation of Parliament in the EU's international trade negotiations, ensuring, in particular and in accordance with Rule 83 of Parliament's Rules of Procedure, that:
ii. v primeru uradne zahteve Parlamenta Svet ne dovoli začetka pogajanj, dokler Parlament na podlagi poročila pristojnega odbora ne zavzame svojega stališča v zvezi s predlaganim pogajalskim mandatom;
ii. in the event of a formal request from Parliament, the Council shall agree not to authorise the opening of negotiations until Parliament has stated its position on the proposed negotiating mandate on the basis of a report from the committee responsible;
vi. se ob zaključku pogajanj in pred podpisom sporazuma Parlamentu posreduje okvirni sporazum, o katerem Parlament izreče mnenje ali soglasje;
vi. when the negotiations are completed, but before any agreement is signed, the draft agreement shall be submitted to Parliament for its opinion or assent;
ki ga predlagajo Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Janusz Onyszkiewicz in Marian Harkin
by Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert, Janusz Onyszkiewicz and Marian Harkin
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o razmerah v Belorusiji, zlasti resolucij z dne 21. februarja in 22. maja 2008,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in placeplaceBelarus, in particular those of 21 February 2008 and 22 May 2008,
ob upoštevanju izjave Evropske komisije z dne 21. novembra 2006 o pripravljenosti Evropske unije za obnovo odnosov z Belorusijo in njenim ljudstvom v okviru evropske sosedske politike,
having regard to the Commission’s declaration of 21 November 2006 on the European Union’s readiness to renew its relationship with Belarus and its people within the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP),
ob upoštevanju predhodnih ugotovitev misije OVSE za spremljanje volitev v Belorusiji z dne 29. septembra 2008,
having regard to the preliminary findings, of 29 September 2008, of the OSCE election monitoring mission in placeplaceBelarus,
ker na parlamentarnih volitvah v Belorusiji niso bila spoštovana merila OVSE za demokratične volitve in opozicijske stranke niso dobile niti enega sedeža v parlamentu,
whereas the 28 September parliamentary elections in Belarus fell short of OSCE standards for democratic elections and failed to secure at least a single parliamentary seat for the opposition parties,
ker so opazovalci volitev OVSE ugotovili, da niso bile upoštevane spodbude za izboljšanje demokratične kulture, prav tako ni bil dosežen težko pričakovani napredek,
whereas the OSCE election observers stated that the signals for an improvement in democratic culture had not been implemented and that the much hoped for progress had failed to materialise,
ker je demokratična opozicija v Belorusiji volitve označila za ponarejene in nepoštene,
whereas the democratic opposition in placeplaceBelarus has denounced the elections as fraudulent and unfair,
izraža globoko obžalovanje, da volitve v Belorusiji znova niso izpolnile mednarodnih demokratičnih meril, kar je povzročilo, da v parlamentu ni predstavnikov opozicije, pač pa so vsi poslanci podporniki Lukašenkovega režima;
Deeply regrets that, once again, elections in placeplaceBelarus have failed to meet international democratic standards, resulting in a parliament without representatives of the opposition and made up entirely of supporters of the Lukashenka regime;
globoko obžaluje, da so neuspešne volitve v nasprotju z nedavno retoriko beloruske vlade, ki je izrazila željo po izboljšanju odnosov z Evropsko unijo ter okrepitvi demokracije, spoštovanja človekovih pravic in pravne države v Belorusiji;
Deeply regrets that these failed elections contradict the recent rhetoric of the Belarusian Government concerning its wish to improve relations with the European Union and strengthen democracy and respect for human rights and the rule of law in placeplaceBelarus;
poudarja, da je bila EU seznanjena z nedavno izpustitvijo aktivistov demokratične opozicije in je upala na boljšo organizacijo volitev, vendar bo nenehen neuspeh pri organizaciji svobodnih in poštenih volitev dodatna ovira za Belorusijo, ki bo še naprej vplivala na njene odnose z Evropsko unijo;
Points out that, while the EU has taken note of the recent release of several democratic opposition activists and harboured hope of an improvement in the organisation of the elections, the persistent failure to organise free and fair elections will be a further set-back for Belarus and will continue to affect its relations with the European Union;
opozarja, da je Evropska unija 21. novembra 2006 izjavila, da je pripravljena v okviru evropske sosedske politike obnoviti odnose z Belorusijo in njenim narodom takoj, ko bo beloruska vlada začela spoštovati demokratične vrednote in temeljne pravice beloruskega naroda;
Recalls that on 21 November 2006 the Europe Union declared its readiness to renew its relationship with placeplaceBelarus and its people within the framework of the European Neighbourhood Policy as soon as the Belarusian Government demonstrates respect for democratic values and for the basic rights of the Belarusian people;
poudarja, da mora Belorusija za začetek obsežnega dialoga z EU uresničiti preostale pogoje, navedene v delovnem dokumentu „Kaj bi lahko EU prinesla Belorusiji“, ki vključujejo izpustitev vseh političnih zapornikov, odpravo smrtne kazni, zagotovitev svobode medijev in svobode izražanja, neodvisnost sodnega sistema ter spoštovanje demokratičnih vrednot in temeljnih pravic beloruskega naroda;
Emphasises that, in order to engage in any substantial dialogue with the EU, Belarus needs to fulfil the remaining conditions laid down in the 'non-paper' entitled 'What the European Union could bring to Belarus', which include release of all political prisoners, the abolition of the death penalty, an assurance of a free media and freedom of expression, the independence of the judiciary, and respect for democratic values and the basic rights of the Belarusian people;
obžaluje, da neuspešne parlamentarne volitve 28. septembra pomenijo, da je Belorusija še vedno daleč od izpolnitve postavljenih pogojev, ki bi omogočili boljše in tesnejše odnose z Evropsko unijo, in poziva Svet, Komisijo in države članice, naj še naprej pritiskajo na beloruske oblasti glede spoštovanja demokratičnih načel in temeljnih pravic beloruskih državljanov ter naj bodo zelo previdni pri vsakem koraku, ki bi ga lahko nasprotna stran razumela kot normalizacijo odnosov, dokler Belorusija ne bo dosegla vidnega napredka;
Regrets that the failed parliamentary election of 28 September means that Belarus is still far from meeting the conditions set for improved and strengthened relations with the European Union, and calls on the Council, the Commission and the Member States to maintain pressure on the Belarusian authorities to respect democratic principles and the fundamental rights of their own citizens, and to be very prudent with any move which could be interpreted as a normalisation of relations, as long as tangible progress in Belarus is missing;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj sprejmeta dodatne ukrepe za lažje in liberalnejše vizumske postopke za beloruske državljane, saj to lahko prepreči čedalje večjo osamitev državljanov Belorusije; prav tako poziva k odpravi prepovedi potovanja za vse beloruske otroke, ki se udeležujejo različnih mladinskih programov v EU;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to take further steps towards the facilitation and liberalisation of visa procedures for Belarusian citizens as this can prevent the citizens of Belarus from becoming increasingly isolated, and also calls for the lifting of the travel ban on all children travelling from Belarus who are taking part in different youth programmes within the EU;
poziva k nadaljnji prepovedi izdajanja vizumov za visoke predstavnike Lukašenkovega režima;
Calls for a continued visa-ban policy for key officials in the Lukashenka regime;
od Sveta in Komisije pričakuje, da bosta ohranila stik z demokratično opozicijo in povečala pomoč beloruski civilni družbi, zlasti finančno pomoč neodvisnim medijem, nevladnim organizacijam in beloruskim študentom, ki študirajo v tujini; pozdravlja finančno pomoč Komisije Evropski univerzi za humanistične vede v Vilni (Litva);
Expects the Council and the Commission to stay in touch with the democratic opposition and to extend more support to the civil society in Belarus and, in particular, to increase financial aid to the independent media, non-governmental organisations and Belarusian students studying abroad; welcomes the financial support given by the Commission to the European Humanities University in Vilnius (Lithuania);
obžaluje odločitev beloruskih oblasti, ki zadnjih nekaj let poslancem Evropskega parlamenta in nacionalnih parlamentov vztrajno zavračajo vstopne vize; poziva beloruske oblasti, naj za delegacijo Evropskega parlamenta za odnose z Belorusijo ne ustvarjajo dodatnih ovir, ki bi ji preprečevale obisk države;
Deplores the decision of the Belarusian authorities to repeatedly refuse entrance visas to Members of the European Parliament and national parliamentarians in the last couple of years; calls on the Belarusian authorities not to create any further obstacles preventing the European Parliament delegation for relations with Belarus from visiting the country;
izraža solidarnost z demokratično opozicijo v Belorusiji in z vsemi beloruskimi državljani, ki si prizadevajo za neodvisno, odprto in demokratično Belorusijo, temelječo na načelih pravne države;
Expresses solidarity with the democratic opposition of placeBelarusplace and all Belarusian citizens who strive for an independent, open and democratic placeBelarus based on the rule of law;
naroči predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posredujejo Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, organizaciji OVSE, Svetu Evrope ter beloruskim oblastem.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the parliaments and governments of the Member States, the OSCE, the Council of Europe and the Belarusian authorities.
ki ga predlagajo Helmuth Markov, Jens Holm, Vittorio Agnoletto, Pedro Guerreiro in Jacky Hénin,
by Helmuth Markov, Jens Holm, Vittorio Agnoletto, Pedro Guerreiro and Jacky Hénin
ob upoštevanju ministrske deklaracije iz Dohe v okviru Svetovne trgovinske organizacije (STO) z dne 14. novembra 2001,
having regard to the Doha Ministerial Declaration of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) of 14 November 2001,
ob upoštevanju končnega dokumenta letnega zasedanja parlamentarne konference 2008 o Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji, ki je bila s soglasjem sprejeta 12. septembra 2008 v Ženevi,
having regard to the Outcome Document of the Annual 2008 Session of the Parliamentary Conference on the WTO, adopted by consensus on 12 September 2008 in Geneva,
ker so pogovori na ministrski ravni v okviru STO julija 2008 propadli zaradi razlik med EU in ZDA na eni strani ter glavnimi državami v razvoju na drugi, in sicer glede bistvenega vprašanja o posebnem zaščitnem mehanizmu za zaščito kmetov in zagotavljanje zanesljive oskrbe s hrano v državah v razvoju, hkrati pa ni bil dosežen dogovor o drugih poglavitnih odprtih vprašanjih, kot so t. i. zelena škatla, uskladitev tarif, subvencije za bombaž, ukinjanje preferencialov, geografske označbe ter uvedba novih pravil glede razkritja porekla, predhodnega dovoljenja in porazdelitve koristi pri pravicah intelektualne lastnine,
whereas the WTO Ministerial talks held in July 2008 collapsed because of the differences between the EU and the US, on one hand, and major developing countries on the other hand, on the essential issue of the special safeguard mechanism (SSM) to protect farmers and to ensure food security of developing countries, and also failed to reach conclusions on such other main outstanding issues as the green box, tariff harmonisation, cotton subsidies, preference erosion, geographical indications and the introduction of new rules with regard to disclosure of origin, prior consent and benefit sharing in intellectual property rights,
ker je razlog za ponoven neuspeh STO po sedmih letih pogajanj dejstvo, da so se pogajanja, čeprav označena kot krog za razvoj, večinoma osredotočila na nadaljnjo liberalizacijo, deregulacijo in dostop do trga za korporacije, čeprav so večstranska pogajanja potrebna za ureditev in vzpostavitev poštene trgovine, da bi obravnavali probleme revščine, epidemij, brezposelnosti, uničevanja okolja in druga vprašanja, ki sedaj jasneje stopajo v ospredje, kot so podnebne spremembe, kriza zaradi pomanjkanja hrane in finančna kriza,
whereas this new failure of the WTO, after 7 years of negotiations, is due to the fact that the negotiations, although described as a 'Round for Development', have mainly focused on further liberalisation, deregulation and market access for corporations, while multilateral negotiations are necessary to regulate and build fair trade in order to address problems of poverty, epidemics, joblessness, destruction of the environment and other issues which are now emerging more clearly, such as climate change, the food crisis and the financial crisis,
ker je osredotočanje predvsem na dostop do trga, deregulacijo in liberalizacijo privedlo do zastoja v večstranskih pogajanjih in pripravo dvostranskih sporazumov, pri čemer vodi Evropa, ki je na podlagi prostotrgovinskega načrta v sporočilu Komisije "Globalna Evropa" začela dvostranska pogajanja o prostotrgovinskih sporazumih z vsemi državami AKP, večino južnoameriških držav in azijskimi državami,
whereas focusing mainly on market access, deregulation and liberalisation has led to the impasse in the multilateral negotiations and the development of bilateral agreements, Europe being the leader in launching bilateral FTA negotiations with all ACP countries, most South American countries and Asian countries, based on the Commission's free trade agenda laid down in its 'Global Europe' Communication,
je seznanjen z novim neuspehom pogajanj v STO v Ženevi po Seattlu in Cancunu ter po sedmih letih zavajajočega koncepta o skupnem svežnju in soglaša s stališčem držav v razvoju, da je nesklenitev dogovora boljša kot slab dogovor, ki bi še poslabšal položaj revnih po svetu;
Takes note of this new failure of the negotiations at the WTO in Geneva, after Seattle and Cancun and after 7 years of the misleading single undertaking concept, and shares the view of developing countries that no deal is better than a bad deal that would further aggravate the situation of the poor worldwide;
meni, da nov neuspeh trgovinskih pogajanj v okviru STO kaže, da mora Evropska unija pregledati svojo politiko o mednarodnih trgovinskih pogajanjih, ter jo poziva, naj predloži nove predloge za večstranska trgovinska pogajanja v prihodnje, da bi oblikovali regulativne in stabilizacijske mehanizme za pravičen mednarodni trgovinski sistem, namenjen reševanju svetovnih problemov, kot so revščina, pomanjkanje razvoja in neodvisnosti glede hrane, epidemije, brezposelnost in selitve podjetij, uničevanje okolja in podnebne spremembe, vrtoglava rast cen hrane in negotovost pri oskrbi s hrano ter finančna kriza; meni, da bi morala Evropska unija Komisiji izdati nov mandat;
Considers that the new failure of the trade negotiations at the WTO indicates that the European Union must review its policy on international trade negotiations, and urges it to bring forward new proposals for future multilateral trade negotiations with a view to adopting regulative and stabilising mechanisms for a fair international trading system, aimed at tackling global problems such as poverty, lack of development and food sovereignty, epidemics, joblessness and relocations, destruction of the environment and climate change, soaring food prices and food insecurity, and the financial crisis; considers that this requires the EU to issue a new mandate to the Commission;
poziva EU, naj ne uveljavlja novih sporazumov o prosti trgovini, naj opusti svojo strategijo Globalna Evropa ter temeljito pregleda izključno usmeritev svoje trgovinske politike v konkurenčnost in svojo enostransko strateško povezavo z Združenimi državami; ponovno izraža svojo zavezanost razvojnim ciljem tisočletja, ki bi morali biti osnovni cilj večstranskega trgovinskega sistema ter dvostranskih trgovinskih odnosov;
Urges the EU to refrain from imposing new FTAs, to abandon its Global Europe strategy, and to thoroughly review the exclusive orientation of its trade policy towards competitiveness and its one-sided strategic alignment with the United States; reiterates its commitment to the Millennium Development Goals, which should be taken as the basic aim of the multilateral trading system as well as bilateral trade relations;
meni, da težave pri pogajanjih kažejo tudi potrebo po nujni obravnavi vprašanja reforme STO, da bi postala učinkovitejša, bolj demokratična in preglednejša ter da bi okrepili njeno odgovornost; predlaga, da se oblikuje pravo in široko zavezništvo, osnovano na temeljnih vrednotah, kot so človekove pravice, socialne pravice, delovni standardi in varstvo okolja, tudi v skladu s konvencijami ZN, da bi dosegli večjo usklajenost med cilji in pravili STO ter zavezami po drugih mednarodnih konvencijah in sporazumih;
Believes that the difficulties encountered in the negotiations also reveal the need to urgently address the question of WTO reform in order to make the organisation more effective, democratic and transparent and increase its accountability; proposes that a real and broad alliance be built which is based on the core values of human rights, social rights, labour standards and environmental protection, among others, in accordance with the UN Conventions, in order to establish greater coherence between the objectives and rules of the WTO and the commitments given under other international conventions and agreements;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj skleneta dogovor, da bi zagotovila celovito sodelovanje Evropskega parlamenta pri vseh mednarodnih trgovinskih pogajanjih EU;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to conclude an agreement to ensure full participation by the European Parliament in all the EU's international trade negotiations;
poziva nacionalne parlamente, naj čim bolj dejavno in skrbno spremljajo razvoj teh pomembnih pogajanj v skladu s svojim pravnim in ustavnim okvirom;
Calls on the national Parliaments to follow the development of these important negotiations as actively and closely as possible, in accordance with their legal and constitutional frameworks;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter generalnemu direktorju Svetovne trgovinske organizacije.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and the parliaments of the PlaceNameplaceMemberPlaceType States and the Director General of the WTO.
o izidu parlamentarnih volitev v Belorusiji
on the results of the parliamentary elections in Belarus
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izidu parlamentarnih volitev v Belorusiji
European Parliament resolution on the results of the parliamentary elections in Belarus
ob upoštevanju predhodnih in sklepnih ugotovitev misije OVSE za opazovanje parlamentarnih volitev v Belorusiji 28. septembra 2008,
having regard to the preliminary findings and conclusions of the OSCE Election Observation Mission to the Parliamentary Elections in country-regioncountry-regionBelarus on 28 September 2008,
ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o Belorusiji, zlasti resolucije z 22. maja 2008 o aretacijah političnih nasprotnikov v Belorusiji,
having regard to its previous resolutions on country-regionBelarus, in particular that of 22 May 2008 on the arrest of political opponents in country-regioncountry-regionBelarus,
ker je OVSE napotil približno 450 mednarodnih opazovalcev iz 43 držav, vključno z več kot 320 opazovalci za krajši čas in 58 strokovnjaki ter opazovalci za daljši čas, pa tudi 66 poslancev in osebja parlamentarne skupščine OVSE,
whereas the OSCE deployed some 450 international observers from 43 countries, including more than 320 short-term observers and 58 experts and long-term observers, as well as 66 parliamentarians and staff from the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly,
ker so opazovalne misije OVSE potrdile izboljšave v postopku volitev, kot so denimo večja vključitev predstavnikov opozicije v volilne komisije, odločitev o ponovnem oddajanju petminutnih reklamnih spotov kandidatov v času največje gledanosti televizije, več možnosti za kandidate, da brez preferenc sestankujejo na odobrenih krajih; ker se je sodelovanje oblasti z opazovalnimi misijami OVSE znatno izboljšalo; ker je bilo glasovanje dobro izpeljano,
whereas the OSCE election observation missions confirmed improvements in the election process, such as increased access of opposition representatives to election commissions, the decision to rebroadcast once the five-minute candidate spots during prime time, and improved possibilities for the candidates to conduct meetings in authorised locations without preference; whereas cooperation extended to the OSCE observation mission by the authorities was considerably improved; whereas voting was well conducted,
ker volilno okolje v Belorusiji vseeno ni dovolilo pristne politične tekme in enakega obravnavanja volilnih tekmecev s strani oblasti; ker še vedno obstaja resna skrb v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami svobode zbiranja in izražanja; ker zakonodajni okvir še vedno otežuje volitve v skladu z obveznostmi OVSE; ker je sestava volilne komisije zmanjšala zaupanje zainteresiranih strani v postopek volitev; ker so bile v zvezi s preglednostjo preštevanja glasov ugotovljene resne pomanjkljivosti,
whereas, nevertheless, the election environment in Belarus still failed to allow genuine political competition and equal treatment of election competitors by the authorities; whereas serious concerns remain with regard to the fundamental rights of freedom of assembly and expression; whereas the legislative framework continues to present obstacles for elections in line with OSCE commitments; whereas the composition of the election commission diminished stakeholders' confidence in the election process; whereas there were serious shortcomings concerning transparency of the vote count,
ker se je beloruska vlada pred parlamentarnimi volitvami zavezala, da bo ustvarila pogoje za svobodne, pravične in pregledne volitve; ker znaki dobre volje niso bili pravilno izkazani ali jih oblasti niso pravilno sprejele,
whereas, prior to the parliamentary elections, the Belarusian Government committed itself to creating the conditions for free, fair and transparent elections; whereas the repeated signals of good will did not seem to have been correctly given or received by the authorities,
ker je misija OVSE za opazovanje volitev zaključila, da "te volitve niso izpolnile obveznosti organizacije OVSE za demokratične volitve",
whereas the OSCE Election Observation Mission concluded that ‘these elections ultimately fell short of OSCE commitments for democratic elections’,