natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da bi morala vsak zakonodajni predlog spremljati presoja vplivov, ki je v zgoraj navedeni resoluciji z dne 20. aprila 2004 opredeljena kot kratek in jasen pregled vplivov po družbeni, gospodarski in okoljski plati ter kot pregled alternativnih politik, ki so zakonodaji na voljo v danih okoliščinah;
Notes the need for every legislative proposal to be accompanied by an impact assessment, which is defined in its above-mentioned resolution of 20 April 2004 as a straightforward mapping-out of the consequences in social, economic and environmental terms, as well as a mapping-out of the policy alternatives that are available to the legislature in that scenario;
meni, da je treba, kadar je osnutek predloga predstavljen Komisiji na zahtevo ene ali več držav članic, to omeniti;
Is of the opinion that, when a draft proposal is presented by the Commission at the request of one or more Member States, this should be mentioned;
poudarja, da je treba v vseh generalnih direktoratih nemudoma in enotno začeti izvajati jasne smernice in strukture za presojo vplivov, ki jih je Komisija objavila junija 2005;
Stresses the need for the clear guidelines and structures for impact assessment, published by the Commission in June 2005, to be implemented uniformly in all DGs without delay;
pozdravlja razvoj presoj vplivov v pripravljalni fazi, vendar opozarja, da ne morejo nadomestiti političnih razprav o prednostih in slabostih zakonov; poudarja, da interesov potrošnikov, podjetij in državljanov ni mogoče skrčiti zgolj na analizo stroškov in koristi; meni, da bi bilo treba zakone izvajati z vso odgovornostjo samih institucij skladno z njihovimi političnimi prednostnimi nalogami; zahteva popolno preglednost med pripravljalno fazo in obrazložitve, ki temeljijo na iskanih rezultatih ter večjo natančnost pri podrobnostih, če je to potrebno; vztraja, da so skupne smernice ob spoštovanju treh lizbonskih stebrov zelo pomembne; vztraja, da je potreben ustrezen proračun;
Welcomes the development of impact assessments in the preparatory phase but warns that they cannot replace political debates about the advantages and disadvantages of laws; emphasises that the interests of consumers, companies and citizens cannot be reduced to a mere cost-benefit analysis; is of the opinion that laws should be executed under the full responsibility of the institutions themselves, in accordance with their political priorities; asks for full transparency during the preparatory phase, for justifications based on the results sought, and for further precision where necessary; insists on the importance of common guidelines in full respect of the three Lisbon pillars; and insists on a proper budget;
poudarja, da bi Komisija morala v presojo vplivov natančneje in skladno z natančnimi smernicami vključiti posledice pomanjkanja zakonodaje glede na izgubo ugodnosti, zlasti v povezavi z zdravjem, blaginjo in trajnostjo; vztraja, da mora kot del presoje vplivov tudi čim prej uvesti metodo, ki jo je razvila za kvantitativno izračunavanje upravnih bremen; ugotavlja, da je taka metoda potrebna zaradi boljšega pregleda stroškov, povezanih z uporabo in izvajanjem zakonodaje; meni, da mora biti dokončna metodologija vključena v presojo vplivov najpozneje do leta 2006;
Stresses that the Commission should include in the impact assessment, in a more precise way and in accordance with precise guidelines, the consequences of an absence of legislation in terms of lost benefits, notably as regards health, welfare and sustainability; insists that it must also put into operation as quickly as possible the method it has developed for calculating administrative burdens in quantitative terms as part of the impact assessment; notes that such a method is needed in order to gain an understanding of the costs associated with applying and implementing legislation; considers that a definitive methodology must be incorporated into the impact assessment by 2006 at the latest;
meni, da je za enotno uporabo presoje vplivov s strani Komisije bistveno, da kakovost presoje vplivov preverja neodvisno nadzorno telo; ne bo upošteval predlogov, če jih ne bo spremljala presoja vplivov, ki jo je preverilo neodvisno nadzorno telo, razen izjemoma, če Parlament te zahteve v posameznih primerih ne opusti;
Considers it essential, in the interests of a uniform application by the Commission of the impact assessment, that the quality of the latter be submitted to independent scrutiny; will not consider any proposals without their being accompanied by an independently scrutinised impact assessment, unless, exceptionally, this requirement is waived by Parliament in individual cases;
želi, da bi "boljšo pravno ureditev" usmerjal globalni pristop, ki bi v celoti vključeval Parlament, Svet in Komisijo ter države članice ter se posvetoval z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, da bi s tem vključil državljane, ki so v nekaterih državah članicah pred nedavnim izrazili pomanjkanje zaupanja v evropski projekt; priporoča, da se v postopkih posvetovanja poveča prispevek in sodelovanje predstavnikov potrošnikov in delavcev;
Wants "better regulation" to follow a global approach, fully involving the Parliament, the Council and the Commission as well as the Member States, and consulting all stakeholders in order to involve citizens who have recently shown, in some Member States, their lack of trust in the European project; recommends an increase in the input and involvement of consumers and workers' representatives in the consultation processes;
poudarja, da se posvetovanje z zainteresiranimi stranmi v pripravljalni fazi razlikuje od pogajanj z njimi med zakonodajnim procesom, ter izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi težnje Komisije, da se dvostransko pogaja s posameznimi državami članicami, preden predstavi zakonodajne predloge, kar včasih pripelje do nenavadnih, neskladnih ali nasprotujočih si določb, možnosti neudeležbe ali izjem za določene države članice, ki izkrivljajo enake konkurenčne pogoje;
Stresses that consulting stakeholders during the preparatory phase is distinct from negotiating with stakeholders during the legislative process, and expresses its concern about the Commission's tendency to hold bilateral negotiations with individual Member States before presenting legislative proposals, which sometimes leads to odd, inconsistent or contradictory provisions, opt-outs or exemptions in favour of particular Member States, distorting the level playing-field;
meni, da je treba med pripravo zakonodaje in presoje vplivov zainteresiranim stranem dati možnost in dovolj časa, da sporočijo svoje odzive, ter da bi jih morala Komisija obvestiti, na kakšen način so bili njihovi odzivi uporabljeni v predlogu; meni, da mora Komisija v zvezi s tem zagotoviti največjo možno preglednost tako, da odzive zainteresiranih strani in presojo vplivov objavi v javno dostopnem registru;
Considers it necessary that, during the preparation of legislation and the impact assessment, interested parties should be given the opportunity, and adequate time, to make their reactions known, and that the Commission should inform interested parties in what way their reactions have been processed in the proposal; takes the view that, in this connection, the Commission must observe maximum transparency by publishing the reactions of interested parties and the impact assessment in a publicly accessible register;
ugotavlja, da veliko izvedbene zakonodaje nastane s postopkom komitologije; meni, da mora takšna zakonodaja zadostiti enakim kakovostnim zahtevam kot izvajana zakonodaja in je torej predmet presoje vplivov, potem ko se razvijejo potrebna znanja in orodja;
Notes that much implementing legislation comes into being via the comitology procedure; considers that such legislation must meet the same quality requirements as implemented legislation and will therefore be subject to impact assessment, once the necessary know-how and tools have been developed;
je prepričan, da se bo Parlament, če bodo njegove zakonodajne pristojnosti v okviru postopka komitologije upoštevane, bolj pripravljen osredotočiti na splošna načela in podpreti poenostavitev zakonodaje in inovacije;
Is convinced that, if the Parliament's legislative powers are respected in the context of comitology, it will be more willing to focus on general principles and support legislative simplification and innovation;
ponovno opozarja, da se lahko presoja vplivov uporablja tudi za predloge bistvenih sprememb Parlamenta in Sveta na predloge Komisije, ter poudarja, da je taka presoja vplivov smiselna samo, če se uporablja enaka metodologija kot pri Komisiji;
Reiterates that Parliament and the Council may also make their significant amendments to Commission proposals subject to an impact assessment and stresses that such an impact assessment makes sense only if the same methodology is used as in the case of the Commission;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da v okviru medinstitucionalnega posvetovanja v bližnji prihodnosti razvijeta metodo in postopek Skupnosti za uporabo presoje vplivov v evropskem političnem procesu in da do septembra 2006 dosežeta konkretne sporazume;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, in the context of interinstitutional consultation, to develop in the near future a Community method and procedure for the application of impact assessment within the European policy process, and to arrive at concrete agreements by September 2006;
opozarja, da morajo metode "boljše pravne ureditve" upoštevati ravnovesje moči med Parlamentom, Svetom in Komisijo ter njihove posamezne vloge; želi, da je prispevek Parlamenta preudaren in celovit ter da gradi na pridobljenih izkušnjah; poudarja potrebo po politični podpori inovacijam v zakonodajnem postopku;
Warns that "better regulation" methods should respect the balance of power between and the respective roles of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission; wants the Parliament to make a wise and integrated contribution, building on previous experience; stresses the need for the political endorsement of innovations in the legislative process;
meni, da zakonodaja na izrazito tehnični ravni ne sme voditi k umiku sozakonodajalcev iz demokratičnega zakonodajnega procesa, temveč jih mora spodbujati, da se posvetijo osrednjim političnim načelom in ciljem ter načinu, kako jih udejanjiti ob spremembi iz predpisovalnega pristopa v odziven in sodelovalen pristop ob uporabi tehničnega znanja in zmogljivosti zakonodajnih organov, ki zakone izvajajo;
Opines that highly technical legislation should not lead to the disengagement of co-legislators from the democratic process of lawmaking but should rather encourage them to concentrate on core political principles and objectives and on how to apply the process of putting them into practice, changing from a prescriptive to a responsive and participative approach and making use of the technical know-how and capacities of the regulatory authorities that have to apply the law;
poziva države članice, da med seboj izmenjajo izkušnje o uporabi presoje vplivov in da to presojo uporabijo tudi za nacionalno zakonodajo;
Calls on the Member States to exchange experiences in the use of impact assessment, and also to apply such assessments to national legislation;
pozdravlja povečano vključevanje nacionalnih parlamentov v delovni program Komisije, vendar pa svari pred metodo naključne izbire predlogov na osnovi subsidiarnosti in sorazmernosti; zahteva, da vsi novi predlogi vsebujejo povzetek obstoječe zakonodaje na zadevnem področju in razlago o skladnosti novega predloga z njo; zahteva, da se po veljavni analizi posameznih posledic glede na pričakovanja državljanov, tri lizbonske stebre, stroške in administrativne obremenitve, zlasti za MSP, Svetu in Parlamentu predlagajo različne možnosti;
Welcomes the increased involvement of national parliaments in the work programme of the Commission, but warns against random cherry-picking of proposals on the basis of subsidiarity and proportionality; asks that all new proposals contain a summary of existing legislation in the relevant field and an explanation as to how the new legislation is to fit into the scheme; asks for different options to be proposed to the Council and Parliament, with a sound analysis of their respective implications as regards citizens' expectations, the three Lisbon pillars, costs, and the administrative burden, especially for SMEs;
da se zagotovi enoten vseevropski zakonodajni okvir, poziva Komisijo, naj se prepriča, da Svet ne spodkopava tega okvira z množico razveljavitvenih določb, ugodnih za posamezne države članice;
In order to guarantee an EU-wide uniform lawmaking framework, urges the Commission to ensure that this framework is not undermined by the Council through a proliferation of derogatory provisions in favour of individual Member States;
poziva Komisijo, da Parlamentu najpozneje v treh letih po začetku veljavnosti nove zakonodaje poroča o njenih učinkih v praksi; pri tem ga predvsem zanima, ali je zakonodaja izpolnila prvotni namen, kakšne učinke ima na mednarodno konkurenčnost v zadevnih sektorjih, nenazadnje tudi z vidika različnih ureditev (ali pomanjkanja ureditve) v konkurenčnih državah in kako se uporablja v praksi; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, da za kvantitativne rezultate presoje vplivov opravlja redne kritične analize zaradi ugotavljanja, ali uporabljena metodologija omogoča zanesljive napovedi, in da o rezultatih poroča Parlamentu;
Calls on the Commission to report to Parliament, no later than three years after the entry into force of new legislation, on the impact of the legislation in practice; is above all interested in the question whether the legislation has fulfilled the original purpose, what effects it has had on the international competitiveness of the relevant sector, not least in the light of different regulations (or the absence of regulation) in competing countries, and how the legislation is complied with in practice; also calls on the Commission to subject the quantitative results of the impact assessment to a regular critical analysis with a view to ascertaining whether the methodology used produces reliable predictions, and to report to Parliament on the results;
poudarja, kako nujno je, da imata Parlament in še posebej odgovorni poročevalec dejavnejšo vlogo pri nadzorovanju izvajanja evropske zakonodaje v državah članicah, pri čemer uporabita mrežo med Evropskim parlamentom in nacionalnimi in/ali regionalnimi parlamenti;
Stresses the need for Parliament, and in particular the rapporteur responsible, to play a more active role in monitoring the implementation of European legislation in the Member States, and to make use of the network between the European Parliament and the national and/or regional parliaments;
meni, da bi bilo treba prenos zakonodaje ES spremljati resno in proaktivno, da bi se izognili razhajajočim se razlagam in "prenatrpanosti"; želi, da ima Komisija skupaj z nadzorniki in skupinami strokovnjakov dejavno vlogo pri prenosu, tako na ravni EU kot na nacionalni ravni, saj lahko zgodnja analiza potencialnih težav prepreči nastanek zamud in nepotrebnih stroškov za podjetja; predlaga, da bi Parlament moral sprejeti ustrezen postopek prehoda in spremljanja ob tesnem sodelovanju s svojimi nacionalnimi partnerji;
Is of the opinion that transposition of EC legislation should be monitored seriously and proactively in order to avoid diverging interpretations and gold-plating; wants the Commission to play an active role in transposition, together with supervisors and expert groups, at both EU and national level, since early analysis of potential pitfalls may prevent delays and unnecessary burdens on companies; suggests that Parliament should set up a proper transposition-monitoring procedure in close cooperation with its national partners;
priznava, da je odprta metoda usklajevanja pomembno politično sredstvo v okviru Lizbonske strategije; vendar poudarja, da ta metoda vseeno ne more vsesplošno nadomeščati bolj formalnega usklajevanja in skupnih ukrepov v zvezi s tem; vztraja, da mora biti Evropski parlament v celoti obveščen o razvoju prakse odprte metode usklajevanja in poziva Komisijo, naj predloži poročilo o oceni te metode; vztraja, da se odprta metoda usklajevanja ne sme razviti v vzporeden in nepregleden zakonodajni postopek, ki bi spodkopaval postopke iz Pogodbe ES in ogrožal parlamentarni nadzor;
Acknowledges that the "open method of coordination" is an important policy tool in the context of the Lisbon Strategy; stresses, however, that this method cannot be seen as a general substitute for more formal coordination and common policy measures in this context; insists that the European Parliament be fully informed on the development of OMC practices and calls on the Commission to submit an evaluationreport on this method; insists that the open method of coordination must not evolve into a parallel, non-transparent legislative procedure which undermines the procedures laid down in the EC Treaty and compromises parliamentary scrutiny;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izvajanju, posledicah in vplivu veljavne zakonodaje notranjega trga ( 2004/2224(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the implementation, consequences and impact of the internal market legislation in force ( 2004/2224(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. junija 2002 o presoji vplivov ( KOM(2002)0276 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 on impact assessment ( COM(2002)0276 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. junija 2002 o z naslovom "Akcijskem načrtu – Poenostavitev in izboljšanje zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2002)0278 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 5 June 2002 entitled "Action plan 'Simplifying and improving the regulatory environment'" ( COM(2002)0278 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 11. decembra 2002 o bolšem spremljanju uporabe prava Skupnosti ( KOM(2002)0725 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 11 December 2002 on better monitoring of the application of Community law ( COM(2002)0725 ),
ob upoštevanju Medinstitucionalnega sporazuma z dne 16. decembra 2003 o boljši pripravi zakonodaje UL C 321, 31.12.2003, str.
having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2003 on better law-making OJ C 321, 31.12.2003, p.
, ki so ga sprejeli Parlament, Svet in Komisija,
concluded between Parliament, the Council and the Commission,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o vplivu zakonodaje Skupnosti in postopku posvetovanja UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 20 April 2004 on the impact of Community legislation and the consultation procedure OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta za konkurenčnost z dne 25. in 26. novembra 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the Competitiveness Council of 25 and 26 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 16. marca 2005 z naslovom "Bolje oblikovani predpisi za rast in delovna mesta v Evropski uniji" ( KOM(2005)0097 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 16 March 2005 entitled "Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union" ( COM(2005)0097 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 21. marca 2005 z naslovom "Boljša priprava zakonodaje 2004" ( KOM(2005)0098 ),
having regard to the Commission report of 21 March 2005 entitled "Better lawmaking 2004" ( COM(2005)0098 ),
ob upoštevanju smernic Komisije za presojo vplivov z dne 15. junija 2005 in prilog k temi smernicam ( SEK(2005)0791 ),
having regard to the Commission's Impact Assessment Guidelines of 15 June 2005, and the annexes thereto ( SEC(2005)0791 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 27. januarja 2005 z naslovom "Drugo poročilo o izvajanju Strategije notranjega trga za obdobje 2003-2006" ( KOM(2005)0011 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 27 January 2005 entitled "Second Implementation Report of the Internal Market Strategy 2003-2006" ( COM(2005)0011 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2005 z naslovom "Izvajanje Lizbonskega programa Skupnosti: Strategija za poenostavitev zakonodajnega okolja" ( KOM(2005)0535 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 25 October 2005 entitled "Implementing the Community Lisbon programme: A strategy for the simplification of the regulatory environment" ( COM(2005)0535 ),
ob upoštevanju ponovne sprožitve Lizbonske strategije 22. in 23. marca 2005,
having regard to the relaunching of the Lisbon Strategy on 22 and 23 March 2005,
ob upoštevanju poročil o dosežkih na področju notranjega trga,
having regard to the internal market scoreboard reports,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ter mnenja Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0083/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0083/2006 ),
ker so Parlament, Svet in Komisija v navedenem Medinstitucionalnem sporazumu zdne 16. decembra 2003 prevzeli obvezo za agendo za boljšo pravno ureditev,
whereas in the above mentioned Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2003 Parliament, the Council and the Commission gave a commitment to the better regulation agenda,
ker je Komisija boljšo pravno ureditev v ponovno sproženem programu lizbonske strategije postavila v središče prizadevanj za delovna mesta in rast v Evropski uniji,
whereas in the relaunched Lisbon Agenda the Commission put better regulation at the heart of the drive for jobs and growth in the European Union,
ker sta deregulacija in zmanjšanje birokracije, ki izvira iz zakonodaje EU, temeljni predpostavki za dosego lizbonskih ciljev,
whereas deregulation and reducing the amount of red tape arising from EU legislation are vital preconditions for attaining the Lisbon objectives,
ker bi izboljšana priprava evropske zakonodaje morala pripomoči k večji konkurenčnosti v svetovnem gospodarstvu, pravičnim konkurenčnim pogojem med podjetji, spodbujanju rasti in krepitvi socialne kohezije,
whereas improved European lawmaking should lead to a more competitive edge in the global economy, fair competitive conditions between companies, the stimulation of growth and the strengthening of social cohesion,
ker zasledovanje cilja boljše pravne ureditve ne sme pripeljati do razvrednotenja okoljskih, socialnih ali potrošniških standardov,
whereas pursuit of the objective of better regulation must not lead to the undermining of environmental, social or consumer standards,
ker bodo državljani in podjetja imeli koristi od dobrih, jasnih in preprostih zakonov notranjega trga, ki bodo olajšali izvajanje in uveljavljanje,
whereas citizens and businesses will benefit from good, clear and simple internal market laws, which will facilitate implementation and enforcement,
ker so zainteresirane strani izrazile zaskrbljenost glede težav, ki so nastale kot posledica nejasnih ali nepopolnih pojmov, opredelitev ali določb v zakonodaji Skupnosti,
whereas stakeholders have raised concerns regarding difficulties experienced as a result of unclear or incomplete concepts, definitions or provisions in Community legislation,
ker so težave pri prenosu in izvajanju pogosto posledica slabo osnovanih zakonodajnih besedil; ker imajo evropski zakonodajni organi veliko odgovornost na tem področju in bi se torej pri pogajanjem morali izogibati zapletenim in nejasnim kompromisom,
whereas problems of transposition and implementation often result from poorly drafted legislative texts; whereas the European legislative bodies have an important responsibility in this matter and should therefore avoid complicated and unclear compromises in negotiations,
ker dvoumnosti v besedilu pri prenosu v nacionalno zakonodajo ustvarijo pravne nejasnosti in neskladnosti, kar lahko privede do izkrivljanja konkurence in drobitve notranjega trga,
whereas textual ambiguities generate legal uncertainties and discrepancies when texts are transposed into national law, with the potential for distortion of competition and fragmentation of the internal market,