natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je vrh ASEM V del procesa ASEM, ki omogoča državam članicam EU in azijskim državam, da vzpostavijo enakopravno azijsko-evropsko partnerstvo, ki temelji na treh stebrih političnega, gospodarskega in kulturnega dialoga;
whereas the ASEM V Summit is part of the ASEM process enabling EU Member States and Asian countries to build an equal Asia-Europe partnership based on the three pillars of political, economic and cultural dialogue,
ker je bilo poročano, da so voditelji držav ASEAN naznanili, da bi Burma morala biti upravičena do udeležbe na vrhu ASEM V;
whereas it is reported that leaders of the ASEAN states have indicated that Burma should be entitled to take part in the ASEM V Summit,
ker Državni svet za mir in razvoj (DSMR) ni spoštoval izidov zadnjih volitev v Burmi leta 1990, ko je Nacionalna zveza za demokracijo (NZD) zmagala z 82% glasov in ji je bilo preprečeno, da bi nastopila funkcijo, čeprav je do tega imela pravico;
whereas the SPDC has failed to respect the results of the last elections held in Burma in 1990, when the National League for Democracy (NLD) won 82% of the vote, and the NLD has been prevented from taking office regardless of its legal right to do so,
ker je prebivalstvo Burme žrtev kršenja človekovih pravic, vključno s prisilnim delom, preganjanjem drugače mislečih, mučenjem, vključevanjem v vojsko otrok vojakov, hudim zlorabljanjem s strani vladnih čet žensk in otrok iz narodnostnih manjšin ter prisilnim razseljevanjem;
whereas the people of Burma are subject to human rights abuses including forced labour, persecution of dissidents, torture, conscription of child soldiers, serious abuse of ethnic minority women and children by government troops, and forced relocation,
ker Daw Aung San Suu Kyi ostaja v hišnem priporu brez dostopa do telefonske zveze in morajo obiskovalci dobiti dovoljenje od vlade, da bi jo lahko videli, ker se Nacionalna zveza za demokracijo (NZD) sooča s stalnim nadlegovanjem in nacionalna konvencija ni omogočila resnične odprte razprave;
whereas Daw Aung San Suu Kyi remains under house arrest without access to telephone communication and with visitors requiring government permission to see her, the National League for Democracy (NLD) has faced continued harassment, and the National Convention has not allowed genuine open debate,
ker je izpustitev na svobodo Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in drugih zaprtih voditeljev NZD bistveni predpogoj za kateri koli pomemben dialog z režimom,
whereas the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other detained NLD leaders is an essential precondition for any meaningful dialogue with the regime,
ker več kot tisoč političnih zapornikov ostaja v zaporih v Burmi in jim vlada Burme še naprej odreka primerno zdravstveno oskrbo v času bivanja v zaporu;
whereas over a thousand political prisoners remain in jail in Burma, and the Burmese government continues to deny prisoners adequate medical care whilst imprisoned,
ker pridružitev 10 novih držav članic EU narekuje širitev ASEM in ker so Kambodža, Laos in Burma zaprosile za članstvo v ASEM;
whereas the accession of 10 new Member States to the EU necessitates enlargement of ASEM, and Cambodia, Laos and Burma have applied to become members of ASEM,
ker so bila na srečanju ASEM v Kildaru aprila 2004 jasno določeni pogoji za včlanitev Burme v ASEM, med drugim izpustitev na svobodo Aung San Suu Kyi kot minimalni pogoj, omogočanje svobodnega delovanja NLD in začetek resničnega političnega dialoga s pro-demokratičnimi in etničnimi skupinami v Burmi,
whereas the ASEM meeting in Kildare in April 2004 laid down clear conditions for Burma's entry into ASEM, including the release of Aung San Suu Kyi as a minimum condition, allowing the NLD to operate freely, and starting genuine political dialogue with pro-democracy and ethnic groups in Burma,
ker režim v Burmi ni izpolnil nobenega od teh pogojev,
whereas none of these conditions have been fulfilled by the Burmese regime,
ker je NZD pozvala k investicijskim sankcijam proti Burmi;
whereas the NLD has called for investment sanctions against Burma,
ker spadajo države članice med največje vlagatelje v Burmo in med njene največje trgovske partnerje;
whereas Member States remain among Burma's biggest investors and trading partners,
ker je Svet sklenil, da v primeru, če vlada Burme ne bo izpolnila naslednjih treh pogojev v času do začetka vrhovnega srečanja ASEM V: izpustitev na svobodo Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in drugih voditeljev NZD; omogočanje svobodnega delovanja NZD; poziv NZD in drugim političnim strankam, naj se svobodno udeležijo Nacionalne konvencije, bo na naslednjem zasedanju dne 11. oktobra sprejel nadaljnje ukrepe.
whereas the Council decided that if the Burmese government had not fulfilled the following three conditions by the time of the ASEM V Summit: the release of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other NLD leaders; allowing the NLD to operate freely; and an invitation to the NLD and other political parties to participate freely in the National Convention, it would take further action at its subsequent session on 11 October,
Obžaluje sklep ministrov za zunanje zadeve EU, s katerim se omogoči udeležbo Burme na vrhu ASEM V in odloži uvedbo nadaljnjih ukrepov do konca vrhovnega srečanja;
Deplores the decision of the EU Ministers of Foreign Affairs to allow the participation of Burma at the ASEM V Summit and to delay the imposition of further actions until after that summit has taken place;
Meni, da bi lahko ta sklep dal znak režimu v Burmi, da EU pripisuje manjši pomen izpustitvi na svobodo Aung San Suu Kyi in s tem vzpodbuja režim, da sprejme nadaljnje ostrejše ukrepe proti NZD in njenim voditeljem;
Considers that this decision could give a signal to the Burmese regime that the EU attaches a lessening priority to the release of Aung San Suu Kyi, thereby encouraging it to take further harsh measures against the NLD and its leaders;
Še vedno vztraja pri tem, da bi se Burma ne smela udeležiti vrha ASEM V in da bi ne smela postati članica ASEM, dokler se v tej državi ne zgodijo trajne politične spremembe v smeri demokracije.
Continues to insist that Burma should not attend the ASEM V Summit, and that Burma should not become a member of ASEM, until irreversible political change towards democracy takes place in that country;
Zahteva takojšnjo izpustitev ter popolno svobodo gibanja in izražanja za Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in druge vodilne člane NZD, kot tudi za druge politične zapornike, ki jih zadržuje Državni svet za mir in razvoj (DSMR).
Demands the immediate release of and full freedom of movement and expression for Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and other leading NLD members as well as other political prisoners held by the State Peace and Development Council;
Poziva, naj se omogoči ponovno odprtje vseh uradov NZD, ki so trenutno zaprti; poziva DSMR, naj nemudoma začne pomemben dialog z NZD in etničnimi skupinami, da bi dosegli vrnitev demokracije in spoštovanje človekovih pravic, vključno s pravicami narodnostnih manjšin v Burmi;
Calls for all NLD offices currently closed to be allowed to reopen; calls on the SPDC to initiate immediately a meaningful dialogue with the NLD and ethnic groups to bring about a return to democracy and respect for human rights, including ethnic minorities' rights in Burma;
Vztraja pri zahtevi, da se DSMR odreče oblasti in da se v celoti spoštujejo izidi zadnjih volitev, da se spremenijo postopki nacionalne konvencije in da se določi časovni okvir za njihovo dovršitev;
Insists that the SPDC relinquish its grip on power and that the results of the last elections be fully respected, that the National Convention procedures be modified and that a time- frame for its completion be established;
Vztraja, da se nemudoma okrepi skupno politiko EU glede Burme in, poleg ukrepov, ki jih je predlagal Svet, tudi prepove uvoz blaga in storitev iz podjetij, ki so v lasti vojske, vojaškega osebja in njihovih družabnikov, da se prepove uvoz strateško pomembnih dobrin iz monopolističnih gospodarskih sektorjev, kot so dragi kamni in les, ter poziva potovalne agencije in neodvisne organizatorje potovanj, naj prenehajo promovirati in prodajati turistična potovanja v Burmo;
Insists that the EU's Common Policy on Burma should be strengthened immediately, and, in addition to the measures proposed by the Council, should also ban the import of goods and services from enterprises owned by the military, military personnel and their associates, ban the import of strategically important goods from sectors of the economy under monopoly, such as gems and timber, and calls on travel agencies and independent tour operators in the EU to stop promoting and selling tourist visits to Burma;
Poziva k imenovanju odposlanca EU, ki bi si prizadeval za zagotovitev izpustitve na svobodo Aung San Suu Kyi ter za svobodno delovanje NZD;
Calls for an EU envoy to be appointed to work towards securing the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and freedom for the NLD;
Poziva ZN, naj uvedejo ciljne sankcije za Burmo, Varnostni svet ZN pa, naj obravnava razmere v Burmi kot nujno zadevo in odposlanika ZN Razalija, da se omogoči neomejen dostop do Aung San Suu Kyi;
Calls on the UN to impose targeted sanctions on Burma, on the UN Security Council to address the situation in Burma as a matter of urgency, and on UN Envoy Razali to be given unrestricted access to Aung San Suu Kyi;
Vztraja pri zahtevi, da se izvajajo priporočila, vsebovana v poročilu posebnega poročevalca ZN iz januarja 2004 ;
Insists that the recommendations of the UN Special Rapporteur's report of January 2004 be implemented;
Poziva države ASEAN, naj se pridružijo EU pri izvajanju večjega pritiska na DSMR, da bi nemudoma izpustil na svobodo Aung San Suu Kyi in druge zaprte člane NZD ter naj naredijo pomembne korake za izvrševanje svojega vpliva na režim v Burmi, da bi tako pripomogli k izboljšanju razmer v tej državi;
Calls on the ASEAN states to join the EU in exerting greater pressure on the SPDC to release Aung San Suu Kyi and other detained NLD members immediately, and to take meaningful steps to exercise their influence over the Burmese regime so as to bring about change for the better in Burma;
Naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam držav članic ASEAN in ASEM, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, NZD, DSMR in generalnemu sekretarju ZN.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Governments of the ASEAN and ASEM Member States, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the NLD, the SPDC and the UN Secretary-General.
– Maria Martens, Robert William Sturdy in Nirj Deva, v imenu skupine PPE-DE
– Maria Martens, Robert William Sturdy and Nirj Deva, on behalf of the PPE-DE Group
– Erika Mann, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Margrietus J. van den Berg in Glenys Kinnock, v imenu skupine PSE
– Erika Mann, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Margrietus J. van den Berg and Glenys Kinnock, on behalf of the PSE Group
– Johan Van Hecke in Thierry Cornillet, v imenu skupine ALDE/ADLE
– Johan Van Hecke and Thierry Cornillet, on behalf of the ALDE/ADLE Group
– Caroline Lucas in Frithjof Schmidt, v imenu skupine Zeleni/ALE
– Caroline Lucas and Frithjof Schmidt, on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
– Luisa Morgantini in Helmuth Markov, v imenu skupine GUE/NGL
– Luisa Morgantini and Helmuth Markov, on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group
– Cristiana Muscardini, v imenu skupine UEN
– Cristiana Muscardini, on behalf of the UEN Group
o sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu svetu z naslovom 'Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od leta 2006 do leta 2015' ( KOM(2004) 461 )
on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee 'Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015' ( COM(2004) 461 )
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu in Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu svetu z naslovom 'Države v razvoju, mednarodna trgovina in trajnostni razvoj: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od leta 2006 do leta 2015' ( KOM(2004) 461 )
European Parliament resolution on the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee 'Developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015' ( COM(2004) 461 )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o državah v razvoju, mednarodni trgovini in trajnostnemu razvoju: funkcija splošnega sistema preferencialov Skupnosti (GSP) za desetletno obdobje od 2006 do 2015 ( KOM(2004) 461 ) UL C ... . ,
having regard to the Commission communication on developing countries, international trade and sustainable development: the function of the Community's generalised system of preferences (GSP) for the ten-year period from 2006 to 2015 ( COM(2004) 461 ) OJ C ... . ,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov svetovnega vrha o trajnostnem razvoju (WSSD) v Johannesburgu (Južna Afrika) od 26. avgusta do 4. septembra 2002,
having regard to the outcome of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), held in Johannesburg (South Africa) from 26 August to 4 September 2002,
ker je bil splošni sistem preferencialov (GSP) vse od njegove uvedbe leta 1971 naprej ključno orodje razvojne politike EU kot tudi trgovinske politike ES,
whereas, since its creation in 1971, the Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) has been a key instrument of the EU's development policy as well as EC trade policy,
ker Komisija v svojem sporočilu določa nove desetletne smernice za splošni sistem preferencialov kot osnovo za serijo triletnih uredb,
whereas the Commission's Communication sets out new ten-year guidelines for the Generalised System of Preferences, on the basis of which a series of three-year regulations will ensue,
ker se je EU zavezala, da bo opravljala resne predhodne presoje vplivov večjih političnih pobud na trajnostni razvoj, vendar mora pri predlogu spremenjenega sistema GSP to šele storiti,
whereas the EU has committed itself to undertake meaningful Sustainability Impact Assessments of the major political initiatives ex ante, but still has to do so in the case of the proposed reformed GSP scheme,
ker je izkoristek GSP (definiran kot tisti delež uvoza iz celotnega obsega trgovine, upravičene do GSP, ki je dejansko izkoristil carinske preferenciale) v zadnjih letih narasel le na 52,5% (v letu 2002), kar je treba izboljšati, še posebej v državah AKP,
whereas the GSP utilisation rate, defined as the volume of imports actually benefiting from tariff preferences as a percentage of the total volume of trade eligible under the GSP, has increased in recent years to not more than 52.5% in 2002, which has to be improved, particularly in the ACP countries;
ker je prizivno telo WTO v svojem sklepu o shemi splošnega sistema preferencialov (GSP) ES z dne 7. aprila 2004 navedlo, da lahko razvite države določijo različne tarife za izdelke iz različnih držav upravičenk do GSP, če so te diferencialne tarife v skladu z ostalimi določbami klavzule o upravičenosti in tako ne zapostavljajo držav z enakimi razvojnimi, finančnimi in trgovskimi potrebami, ki so jim ugodnosti namenjene,
whereas the WTO India Appellate Body, in its ruling of 7 April 2004 on the EC's Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) scheme, stated that developed countries may grant different tariffs to products originating from different GSP beneficiaries, provided that such differential tariff treatment meets the remaining conditions in the Enabling Clause and thus ensures non-discrimination against countries with the same development, financial and trade needs which the benefits are intended to address,
ker je GSP najširši preferenčni sistem, ki ga ponujajo razvite države, in ker bo to vodilno mesto v naslednjih letih s pristopom desetih novih držav članic še okrepljeno,
whereas the GSP is the broadest preferential system offered by the developed countries and whereas, moreover, this leading position will be consolidated over the coming years, following the accession of the ten new Member States,
ugotavlja, da Komisija za dosego teh ciljev predlaga daljnosežne reforme sedanjega sistema GSP, kot recimo zmanjšanje števila določb s petih na tri, nov ocenjevalni sistem, osnovan samo na merilih tržnega deleža, ter poenostavitev pravil o izvoru;
Notes that, in order to achieve its declared objectives, the Commission proposes far-reaching reforms of the current GSP system, such as a reduction in the arrangements from five to three, a new graduation system based only on market share criteria and the simplification of rules of origin;
obžaluje, da se to pomembno sporočilo, ki določa nove desetletne smernice za GSP, ne nanaša na nobeno prejšnjo temeljito oceno delovanja in vplivov sedanjega GSP, in od Komisije zahteva, naj oblikovalcem politike zagotovi dostop do zanesljivih informacij tako o potrebnosti reform kot o možnostih za izboljšanje;
Regrets that this important Communication, which sets out new ten-year guidelines for the GSP, does not refer to any prior thorough evaluation of the functioning and impact of the current GSP, and requests the Commission to provide decision-makers with solid elements of information on both the need for reform and the potential for improvement;
obžaluje, da sporočilo Komisije ni rezultat ustreznega posvetovanja zainteresiranih strani in da prihaja prepozno za kakršna koli konkretna posvetovanja v pričakovanju objave predloga za naslednjo uredbo;
Regrets that the Commission’s Communication was not the result of a proper stakeholder consultation and does not come sufficiently in advance to allow for meaningful consultations in anticipation of the expected release of the proposal for the next regulation;
opozarja, da carine še nikoli niso bile tako nizke in da bi morala biti nadaljnja zniževanja tarif predmet sporazuma na pogajanjih WTO o razvojni agendi iz Dohe, ter ugotavlja, da bi moral novi sistem GSP obravnavati učinke teh zniževanj, še posebej na najmanj razvite države;
Recalls that customs duties have steadily fallen to an all-time low and that further tariff reductions should be agreed upon as a result of WTO negotiations on the Doha Development Agenda, and notes that the effects of these reductions notably on the Least Developed Countries should be addressed by the new GSP system;
a) določati preferenciale v skladu s primerjalnimi prednostmi in izvoznimi interesi samih držav v razvoju, še posebej upoštevajoč najbolj izpostavljene dele družbe;
a) grant preferences in conformity with the comparative advantage and export interests of developing countries themselves, especially taking account of the most vulnerable sectors of society;
c) upoštevati pomembnost suverenosti hrane in pravice zadevnih držav, da pri izvajanju GSP zaščitijo svoje kmetijstvo;
c) consider the importance of food sovereignty and the right of the countries concerned to protect their agriculture in the implementation of the GSP;
d) zagotoviti, da izvajanje novega ocenjevalnega sistema ne bo imelo znatnih negativnih vplivov na zadevne države v razvoju;
d) ensure that the new graduation system applied does not have a significant negative impact on the developing countries concerned;
pozdravlja splošno težnjo po poenostavitvi ocenjevalnega mehanizma, vendar z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da novi ocenjevalni sistem, kot ga je zastavila Komisija, temelji samo na merilih tržnega deleža, ne upošteva pa kazalcev razvoja in revščine, ter verjame, da bi takšen sistem lahko zapostavljal velike, toda revne izvoznike;
Welcomes the overall objective of simplifying the graduation mechanism, but notes with concern that the new graduation system outlined by the Commission is based solely on market share criteria, disregarding development and poverty indicators, and believes that such a system could discriminate against large yet poor exporters;
podpira spodbujanje trajnostnega razvoja kot ključnega dela GSP; opozarja, da mora biti enotni sistem dodatnih koncesij (GSP plus) nujno preprost in predvidljiv ter združljiv s klavzulo WTO o upravičenosti, tako da vključuje objektivna merila za izbor in ocenjevanje držav upravičenk;
Endorses the promotion of sustainable development as a key component of the GSP; insists on the fundamental importance of a single system of additional concessions (GSP plus) being a simple and predictable arrangement that is compatible with the WTO Enabling Clause and thus provides for objective criteria for the selection and evaluation of beneficiary countries;
vztraja, da morajo države upravičenke za izpolnitev sprejemnih meril za 'GSP Plus' nujno tako ratificirati kot izvajati ustrezne mednarodne konvencije in da mora bodoča uredba določiti zanesljive ocenjevalne postopke za preverjanje dosežkov teh držav, vključujoč Evropski parlament in druge zainteresirane strani, recimo socialne partnerje, in da bodo ti postopki za primere nezadostnega izvajanja določali možnost uvedbe preiskave; poudarja, da mora raven izvajanja človekovih pravic v zadevnih državah postati odločujoče merilo pri sprejemanju odločitev;
Insists that it is crucial that, to qualify for "GSP Plus", beneficiary countries must have both ratified and implemented the relevant international conventions, and that the forthcoming Regulation must specify credible procedures by which this can be assessed, involving the European Parliament and other stakeholders, e.g. social partners, and by which investigations can be initiated in case of evidence of inadequate implementation; stresses that the implementation level of human rights within the addressed countries must become a decision-making criterion;
predlaga, naj omenjena uredba predvidi možnost odvzema preferencialov 'GSP Plus' za določene sektorje v primeru resnih in stalnih kršitev sprejemnih meril;
Suggests that the Regulation should provide for the possibility of withdrawing 'GSP Plus' preferences in respect of specific sectors in the event of serious and persistent violations of the eligibility criteria;
vztraja, naj se EU zaveže k razvojni pomoči za vzpostavljanje novih zmogljivosti, ki bodo državam v razvoju pomagale izpolniti sprejemna merila za 'GSP Plus', drugače bi lahko standardi postali netarifne ovire (NTB) in veliko držav ne bi bilo deležnih morebitnih prednosti sistema;
Insists that the EU commit itself to providing development assistance towards capacity building in order to help developing countries to qualify for 'GSP Plus', failing which the standards set could act as NTBs and a large number of countries could miss out on the potential benefits of the system;
pozdravlja poudarek, ki ga Komisija daje poenostavitvi, hkrati pa opozarja na zapletenost uveljavitve predlagane formule ('klavzula o izvzetju PTS' (prostotrgovinskih sporazumov));
Welcomes the Communication's emphasis on simplification, but draws attention to the complexity of implementing the proposed formula ('FTA-exclusion clause');
ugotavlja, da so pravila o izvoru in podobni upravni postopki dokazano eden od glavnih razlogov za premajhno uporabo trgovinskih preferencialov GSP, še posebej v primeru najmanj razvitih držav;
Notes that rules of origin and related administrative procedures have been demonstrated to be one of the main reasons for the under-utilisation of GSP trade preferences, particularly by Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
poziva Komisijo, naj prouči, še posebej z ozirom na najmanj razvite države, prednosti širjenja delne regionalne kumulacije porekla na medregionalno kumulacijo in celovito oziroma svetovno kumulacijo;
Calls on the Commission to explore the merits, particularly with regards to LDCs, of the expansion of partial regional cumulation of origin to cross-regional cumulation and full or global cumulation;