natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Vprašanja glede področja uporabe obveznosti univerzalne storitve bodo v celoti obravnavana v ločenem postopku, saj ta direktiva obravnava samo druge vidike Direktive 2002/22/ES.
As questions relating to the scope of the universal service obligation will therefore be fully dealt with in that separate procedure, this Directive only deals with other aspects of Directive 2002/22/EC.
Brez poseganja v Direktivo 1999/5/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 9. marca 1999 o radijski opremi in telekomunikacijski terminalski opremi ter medsebojnem priznavanju skladnosti te opreme
Without prejudice to Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity
in zlasti zahtev glede invalidnosti na podlagi člena 3(3)(f) navedene direktive, bi morali biti nekateri vidiki terminalske opreme, vključno z opremo za uporabnike invalide, preneseni v področje uporabe Direktive 2002/22/ES, da se omogoči dostop do omrežij in do uporabe storitev.
, and in particular the disability requirements laid down in Article 3(3)(f) thereof, certain aspects of terminal equipment, including equipment intended for disabled users, should be brought within the scope of Directive 2002/22/EC in order to facilitate access to networks and the use of services.
Takšna oprema vključuje sprejemno radijsko in televizijsko terminalsko opremo ter posebne terminalske naprave za slušno prizadete uporabnike.
Such equipment currently includes receive-only radio and television terminal equipment as well as special terminal devices for hearing-impaired users.
Države članice bi morale uvesti ukrepe za spodbujanje oblikovanja trga za široko razpoložljive proizvode in storitve, ki vsebujejo naprave za uporabnike invalide.
Member States should introduce measures to promote the creation of a market for widely available products and services incorporating facilities for disabled users.
To se lahko med drugim doseže s sklicevanjem na evropske standarde, z uveljavitvijo zahtev elektronske dostopnosti (e-dostopnost) za postopke javnih naročil in storitev v zvezi z javnimi razpisi ter z izvajanjem zakonodaje, ki vključuje pravice invalidov.
This can be achieved inter alia by referring to European standards, by introducing electronic accessibility (eAccessibility) requirements for public procurement procedures and the provision of services relating to calls for tender, and by implementing legislation upholding the rights of the disabled.
elektronsko komunikacijske storitve
an electronic communications
, ki je na voljo javnosti za odpravljanje in sprejemanje, neposredno ali posredno prek izbire ali predizbire operaterja ali nadaljnje prodaje, medkrajevnih in/ali mednarodnih klicev
service available to the public for originating and receiving, directly or indirectly via carrier selection or pre-selection or resale, national and/or international calls
in komunikacijsih sredstev, zlasti namenjenih uporabnikom invalidom, ki uporabljajo storitve prenosa besedil ali celotnega pogovora
and means of communication specifically intended for disabled users using text relay or total conversation services
z uporabo številke ali številk iz državnega ali mednarodnega načrta telefonskega oštevilčenja
through a number or numbers in a national or international telephone numbering plan
, če je ta storitev zasnovana na vodovno komutirani ali paketno komutirani tehnologiji
, whether such a service is based on circuit switching or packet switching technology
Narava take storitve je, da je dvosmerna, kar omogoča, da lahko komunicirata obe strani
It is the nature of such a service that it is bidirectional, enabling both parties to communicate
Storitev, ki ne izpolnjuje vseh teh pogojev
A service which does not fulfil all these conditions
, kot je aplikacija "na klik" na spletni strani za pomoč strankam
, such as for example a "click-through" application on a customer service website,
, ni javno dostopna telefonska storitev.
is not a publicly available telephone service.
Treba je pojasniti uporabo nekaterih določb, da se upoštevajo primeri, ko ponudnik storitev preprodaja ali spreminja blagovno znamko javno dostopnih telefonskih storitev, ki jih opravlja drugo podjetje.
It is necessary to clarify the application of certain provisions to take account of situations where a service provider resells or re-brands publicly available telephone services provided by another undertaking.
Tako ločevanje ne sme vplivati na obseg obveznosti univerzalne storitve, opredeljenih in preučenih na ravni Skupnosti.
Such separation should not affect the scope of universal service obligations defined and reviewed at Community level.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost spremljati razvoj in višino maloprodajnih tarif storitev, ki spadajo v okvir obveznosti univerzalne storitve, tudi če država članica še ni določila podjetja za zagotavljanje univerzalne storitve.
National regulatory authorities should be able to monitor the evolution and the level of retail tariffs for services that fall under the scope of universal service obligations even when a Member State has not yet designated an undertaking to provide universal service.
Odvečne obveznosti, katerih namen je bil olajšati prehod iz starega regulativnega okvira iz leta 1998 na okvir iz leta 2002, se, skupaj z drugimi določbami, ki se prekrivajo ali podvajajo z določbami iz Direktive 2002/21/ES, črtajo.
Redundant obligations designed to facilitate the transition from the old regulatory framework of 1998 to the one of 2002 should be deleted, together with other provisions that overlap with and duplicate those laid down in Directive 2002/21/EC.
Nadaljnje izvajanje izbire ali predizbire operaterja neposredno z zakonodajo Skupnosti bi lahko oviralo tehnološki napredek.
Continuing to impose carrier selection and carrier pre-selection directly by Community legislation could hamper technological progress.
Ta pravna sredstva bi moral izvajati nacionalni regulativni organ kot posledico analize trga v skladu s postopki iz Direktive 2002/21/ES.
These remedies should rather be imposed by national regulatory authorities as a result of market analysis in accordance with the procedures in Directive 2002/21/EC.
Določbe o pogodbah se ne smejo nanašati samo na potrošnike, ampak tudi na končne uporabnike, predvsem na mikro podjetja ter mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP), ki se zavzemajo za pogodbo, ki je prilagojena potrebam potrošnika.
The provisions on contracts should apply not only to consumers but also to other end-users, primarily micro enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which may prefer a contract adapted to consumer needs.
V izogib nepotrebnim upravnim bremenom za ponudnike in zahtevnosti, povezani z opredelitvijo MSP, se določbe o pogodbah ne bi smele samodejno uporabljati za tiste ostale končne uporabnike, ampak samo, kadar le-ti tako zahtevajo.
To avoid unnecessary administrative burdens on providers and complexity related to the definition of SMEs, the provisions on contracts should not apply automatically to those other end-users, but only where they so request.
in informacije o lokaciji kličočega
and caller location information
, ter da dobijo jasne in pregledne informacije v prvotni potrošniški pogodbi ter nato v rednih intervalih, na primer v informacijah o izdanih računih.
is provided, and are given clear and transparent information in the initial customer contract and at regular intervals thereafter, for example in customer billing information.
Te informacije bi morale vključevati vse omejitve glede ozemeljske pokritosti, na podlagi načrtovanih tehničnih operativnih parametrov storitve in razpoložljive infrastrukture.
This information should include any limitations as to territorial coverage, on the basis of the planned technical operating parameters of the service and the available infrastructure.
Države članice pa bi morale imeti možnost, če se jim zdi primerno, spodbujati razvoj in izvajanje drugih sredstev dostopa do storitev v sili, ki bi bila zmožna zagotoviti dostop, enakovreden glasovnim klicem.
Member States should however, if they deem it appropriate, be free to promote the development and implementation of other means of access to emergency services which are capable of ensuring access equivalent to voice calls.
Potrošniki morajo biti tudi dobro obveščeni o možnih
Customers should also be kept well informed of possible
vrstah ukrepov
types of action
ponudnika elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev glede ogrožanja varnosti ali kot odziv na incident glede varnosti ali integritete, ker imajo taki ukrepi lahko posreden ali neposreden vpliv na podatke ali zasebnost potrošnika ali na druge vidike opravljene storitve.
that the provider of electronic communications service may take to address security threats or in response to a security or integrity incident, since such actions could have a direct or indirect impact on the customer's data, privacy or other aspects of the service provided.
Glede terminalske opreme, bi morale biti v potrošniški pogodbi podrobno navedene vse omejitve, ki jih ponudnik nalaga za potrošnikovo rabo takšne opreme, kot je na primer mobilni telefon zaklenjen s SIM kartico, in vse stroške, povezane s prekinitvijo pogodbe prej oziroma na dogovorjeni dan izteka pogodbe, vključno z vsemi stroški, ki nastanejo v primeru, da se oprema obdrži.
With respect to terminal equipment, the customer contract should specify any restrictions imposed by the provider on the customer's use of such equipment, such as by way of "SIM-locking" mobile devices, and any charges due on termination of the contract, whether before or on the agreed expiry date, including any cost imposed in order to retain the equipment.
Brez nalaganja obveznosti ponudniku, da ukrepa prek zahtev iz prava Skupnosti, bi morale potrošniške pogodbe podrobno navesti tudi vrsto ukrepa, če obstaja, ki ga lahko ponudnik uporabi v primeru incidentov v zvezi z varnostjo in celovitostjo ali v primeru groženj in ranljivosti, kakor tudi ukrepe, ki jih ponudnik izvaja za zagotovitev nadomestila, v primeru takšnih razmer.
Without imposing any obligation on the provider to take action over and above what is required under Community law, the customer contract should also specify the type of action, if any, the provider might take in case of security or integrity incidents, threats or vulnerabilities, as well as any arrangements implemented by the provider to provide compensation if such events occur.
Da bo mogoče obravnavati vprašanja javnega interesa v zvezi z uporabo komunikacijskih storitev ter spodbuditi varstvo pravic in svoboščin drugih, bi morali imeti zadevni nacionalni organi možnost, da ob pomoči ponudnikov oblikujejo in razširjajo informacije javnega interesa glede uporabe komunikacijskih storitev.
In order to address public interest issues with respect to the use of communications services, and to encourage protection of the rights and freedoms of others, the relevant national authorities should be able to produce and have disseminated, with the aid of providers, public interest information related to the use of communications services.
Te informacije zajemajo opozorila javnega interesa glede kršitev avtorskih pravic, drugih nezakonitih oblik uporabe in razširjanja škodljivih vsebin ter nasvete in možnosti zaščite pred grožnjami osebni varnosti (ki na primer izhajajo iz razkritja osebnih podatkov v določenih okoliščinah), zasebnosti in osebnim podatkom.
This information should include public interest warnings regarding copyright infringement, other unlawful uses and dissemination of harmful content, and advice and means of protection against risks to personal security, which may for example arise from disclosure of personal information in certain circumstances, privacy and personal data.
Informacije bi bilo mogoče usklajevati s postopkom sodelovanja iz člena 33(2a) Direktive 2002/22/ES.
The information could be coordinated by way of the cooperation procedure established by Article 33(2a) of Directive 2002/22/EC.
Takšne informacije javnega interesa bi bilo treba po potrebi posodabljati ter jih predstaviti v lahko razumljivi natisnjeni in elektronski obliki, kot določi posamezna država članica, ter na spletnih straneh nacionalnih javnih organov.
Such public interest information should be updated whenever necessary and should be presented in easily comprehensible printed and electronic formats, as determined by each Member State, and on the websites of the national public authorities.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti pristojnost, da ponudnikom naložijo obveznost, naj te informacije posredujejo svojim uporabnikom na način, ki se zdi nacionalnim regulativnim organom primeren.
National regulatory authorities should be able to oblige providers to disseminate this standardised information to all their customers in a manner deemed appropriate by the national regulatory authorities.
Ponudniki storitev in ustrezni organi bi se morali dogovoriti o večjih dodatnih stroških, ki bi jih ponudniki imeli zaradi razširjanja teh informacij, stroške pa bi morali poravnati ti organi.
Significant additional costs incurred by service providers for dissemination of such information should be agreed between the providers and the relevant authorities and met by those authorities.
Te informacije bi bilo treba vključiti tudi v pogodbe.
The information should also be included in contracts.
Pravica naročnikov, da odstopijo od svojih pogodb brez pogodbene kazni, se nanaša na spremembe pogodbenih pogojev, ki jih naložijo ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij in/ali storitev.
The right of subscribers to withdraw from their contracts without penalty refers to modifications in contractual conditions which are imposed by the providers of electronic communications networks and/or services.
Predpisi Skupnosti o varstvu potrošnikov in nacionalni predpisi, ki so v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti, se za Direktivo 2002/22/ES uporabljajo brez izjeme.
Community rules on consumer protection and national rules in conformity with Community law should apply to Directive 2002/22/EC without exception.
Končni uporabniki bi morali imeti možnost odločiti se, kakšno zakonito vsebino bi želeli pošiljati in sprejemati ter katere storitve, aplikacije, strojno in programsko opremo želijo v ta namen uporabljati, brez poseganja v potrebo po ohranjanju celovitosti in varnosti omrežij in storitev.
End-users should decide what lawful content they want to be able to send and receive, and which services, applications, hardware and software they want to use for such purposes, without prejudice to the need to preserve the integrity and security of networks and services.
Konkurenčni trg
A competitive market
s preglednimi ponudbami, kot je predvideno v Direktivi 2002/22/ES,
with transparent offerings as provided for in Directive 2002/22/EC
Glede na uporabljeno tehnologijo in na vrsto omejitve takšne omejitve lahko zadevajo privolitev uporabnika v okviru Direktive 2002/58/ES.
Depending on the technology used and the type of restriction and/or limitation, such restrictions and/or limitations may require user consent under Directive 2002/58/EC.
Konkurenčni trg bi moral zagotoviti, da uporabniki lahko dobijo tako kakovost storitve, kot jo zahtevajo, v nekaterih primerih pa bo morda treba zagotoviti, da javna komunikacijska omrežja dosegajo najnižje ravni kakovosti, da se prepreči poslabšanje storitve, omejitve uporabe ter upočasnitev prometa.
A competitive market should also ensure that users are able to have the quality of service they require, but in particular cases it may be necessary to ensure that public communications networks attain minimum quality levels so as to prevent degradation of service, usage restrictions and/or limitations and the slowing of traffic.
Če ni učinkovite konkurence, bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi uporabiti pravna sredstva, ki so jim na voljo v okviru direktiv, ki določajo regulativni okvir za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve, da zagotovijo, da dostop uporabnikov do določenih vrst vsebin ali aplikacij ni neupravičeno omejen.
Where there is a lack of effective competition, national regulatory authorities should use the remedies available to them under the directives establishing the regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services to ensure that users" access to particular types of content or applications is not unreasonably restricted.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost izdajanja smernic, ki določajo minimalne zahteve glede kakovosti storitev v okviru Direktive 2002/22/ES, in sprejemanja ukrepov, kjer po njihovem mnenju te druge rešitve niso bile učinkovite glede interesov uporabnikov in vseh ostalih zadevnih okoliščin.
It should also be possible for national regulatory authorities to issue guidelines setting minimum quality of service requirements under Directive 2002/22/EC and to take other measures where such other remedies have, in their judgement, not been effective with regard to the interests of users and all other relevant circumstances.
Takšne smernice ali ukrepi lahko vključujejo nudenje osnovne vrste neomejenih storitev.
Such guidelines or measures could include the provision of a basic tier of unrestricted services.
Če ni ustreznih pravil prava Skupnosti, bi se moralo šteti, da so vsebina, aplikacije in storitve zakonite ali škodljive v skladu z nacionalnim materialnim in procesnim pravom.
In the absence of relevant rules of Community law, content, applications and services should be deemed lawful or harmful in accordance with national substantive and procedural law.
Ustrezni organi držav članic, ne ponudniki elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij ali storitev, imajo nalogo, da v skladu s postopkom odločijo, ali so vsebina, aplikacije ali storitve zakonite ali škodljive.
It is the task of the relevant authorities of the Member States, not of providers of electronic communications networks or services, to decide, in accordance with due process, whether or not content, applications and services are lawful or harmful.
Direktiva 2002/22/ES ne posega v Direktivo 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju)
Directive 2002/22/EC is without prejudice to Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on electronic commerce)
, ki med drugim vključuje določilo o izključnem prenosu podatkov za posredne ponudnike storitev.
, which inter alia contains a "mere conduit" rule for intermediary service providers.
Direktiva 2002/22/ES od ponudnikov ne zahteva, da spremljajo informacije, prenesene prek njihovih omrežij, ali da začnejo sodni postopek zoper svoje uporabnike na podlagi takšnih informacij, niti ponudniki ne jamčijo za navedene informacije.
Directive 2002/22/EC does not require providers to monitor information transmitted over their networks or to bring legal proceedings against their customers on grounds of such information, nor does it make providers liable for that information.
Za takšne kazenske ukrepe ali kazenske postopke ostajajo odgovorni ustrezni organi sodnega pregona.
Responsibility for punitive action or criminal prosecution remains with the relevant law enforcement authorities.
Direktiva 2002/22/ES ne posega v razumno in nediskriminacijsko upravljanje omrežja, ki ga izvajajo ponudniki.
Directive 2002/22/EC is without prejudice to reasonable and non-discriminatory network management by providers.
Ker bodo neskladne rešitve znatno škodile dokončanju notranjega trga, bi morala Komisija oceniti vse smernice ali druge ukrepe, ki so jih sprejeli nacionalni regulativni organi za morebitno regulativno ukrepanje v Skupnosti in, če se zdi potrebno, sprejeti tehnične izvedbene ukrepe, da se doseže skladno izvajanje na vsem območju Skupnosti.
Since inconsistent remedies will significantly impair the achievement of the internal market, the Commission should assess any guidelines or other measures adopted by national regulatory authorities for possible regulatory intervention across the Community and, if necessary, adopt technical implementing measures in order to achieve consistent application throughout the Community.
Razpoložljivost preglednih, najnovejših in primerljivih tarif je ključnega pomena za potrošnike na konkurenčnih trgih, kjer je veliko ponudnikov storitev.
The availability of transparent, up-to-date and comparable tariffs is a key element for consumers in competitive markets with several providers offering services.
, sami ali prek tretjih strani, brezplačno ali po primerni ceni,
, themselves or through third parties,
Operaterji niso upravičeni do nadomestila za tako uporabo tarif,
free of charge or at a reasonable price
so že bile objavljene in so tako v javni uporabi.
already been published and thus belong to the public domain.
Nacionalni regulativni organi bi morali imeti možnost zahtevati, da so takšne informacije na splošno na voljo in obstajajo za nekatere vrste storitev, ki jih opredelijo sami, pred priključitvijo klica.
National regulatory authorities should be able to require that such information is provided generally, and, for certain categories of services determined by them, prior to connecting the call.
Pri opredeljevanju kategorij klica za zahtevanje informacij o oblikovanju cen pred priključitvijo bi morali nacionalni regulativni organi upoštevati vrsto storitve, pogoje oblikovanja cen, ki se uporabljajo, in če storitve ponudi ponudnik, ki ni ponudnik elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev.
When determining the categories of call requiring pricing information prior to connection, national regulatory authorities should take due account of the nature of the service, the pricing conditions which apply to it and whether it is offered by a provider who is not a provider of electronic communications services.
Uporabniki bi morali biti obveščeni o svojih pravicah glede uporabe svojih osebnih podatkov v imeniku naročnikov, in zlasti o namenu ozirom namenih takšnih imenikov, kakor tudi brezplačno o svoji pravici, da niso vključeni v javni imenik naročnikov, kot je predvideno v Direktivi 2002/58/ES.
Customers should be informed of their rights with respect to the use of their personal information in directories of subscribers, and in particular of the purpose or purposes of such directories, as well as their right, free of charge, not to be included in a public subscriber directory, as provided for in Directive 2002/58/EC.
Kjer obstajajo sistemi, ki omogočajo, da so informacije vključene v zbirko podatkov imenika, vendar niso razkrite uporabnikom imenika, bi bilo treba uporabnike storitve obvestiti tudi o tej možnosti.
Where systems exist allowing information to be included in the directory database but not disclosed to users of directory services customers should also be informed of that possibility.
Države članice bi morale uvesti skupna informativna mesta za vsa vprašanja uporabnikov.
The Member States should introduce single information points for all user queries.
Ta informativna mesta, ki jih lahko upravljajo nacionalni regulativni organi skupaj s potrošniškimi združenji, bi morali imeti možnosti zagotavljati tudi pravno pomoč v primeru sporov s ponudniki.
These information points, which could be administered by the national regulatory authorities together with consumer associations, should also be able to provide legal assistance in case of disputes with operators.
Dostop do teh informacijskih mest bi moral biti brezplačen, uporabniki pa biti obveščeni o njihovem obstoju z rednimi informacijskimi kampanjami.
Access to these information points should be free of charge and users should be informed of their existence by regular information campaigns.
Storitve pomoči operaterja uporabnikom vključujejo različne storitve za končne uporabnike.
Operator assistance services cover a range of different services for end-users.