natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
obžaluje, da pismo DHS ne vsebuje jasno izraženega namena, pač pa navaja, da se podatki PNR lahko uporabijo za boj proti terorizmu in podobna kazniva dejanja, kot tudi za številne druge, neopredeljene namene, npr. za zaščito bistvenih interesov posameznika, na katerega se osebni podatki nanašajo, ali drugih oseb, ali v katerem koli kazenskem postopku, oziroma v drugem zakonsko določenem primeru;
Regrets the lack of clear purpose-limitation given in the DHS letter, which notes that the PNR data may be used for the fight against terrorism and related crimes, but also for a range of unspecified additional purposes, notably 'for the protection of the vital interests of the data subject or other persons, or in any criminal judicial proceedings, or as otherwise required by law';
vztraja, da so skupni redni pregledi DHS in EU izčrpni, da se izvajajo vsakoletno in da so njihove ugotovitve objavljene; vztraja, da morajo pregledi vsebovati oceno učinkovitosti ukrepov, kar zadeva večjo varnost; obžaluje dejstvo, da pri pregledih ni predvideno sodelovanje evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov oziroma njegovih nacionalnih kolegov, kar je določal prejšnji sporazum PNR;
Insists that the joint periodic review by the DHS and the EU must be comprehensive and take place annually and that the results must be published; insists that the review must include an assessment of the effectiveness of the measures in terms of greater security; regrets the fact that the review does not provide for any involvement of national or European data protection supervisors, which was provided for under the previous PNR agreement;
vztraja, da morajo biti potniki ustrezno obveščeni o uporabi njihovih podatkov in o njihovih pravicah, zlasti o pravici do pravnega sredstva in pravici, da so obveščeni, na kakšni osnovi so lahko zadržani, ter da je obveščanje naloga prevoznikov; meni, da morata DHS in Komisija prevzeti odgovornost za obveščanje potnikov, ter predlaga, da bi si potniki lahko prebrali "Kratko obvestilo o potovanju med Evropsko unijo in ZDA", kar je predlagala delovna skupina iz člena 29 (WP 132);
Insists that passengers must be properly informed of the use of their data and their rights, especially the right to redress and the right to be informed on what basis a traveller is stopped, and that this obligation rests with the airlines; believes that the DHS and the Commission must take responsibility for the information provided to passengers and proposes that the 'Short notice for travel between the European Union and the United States' suggested by the Article 29 Working Party (WP 132) be made available to all passengers;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se pri pogajanjih Unije z ZDA niso upoštevali ne Direktiva 2004/82/ES niti sporazuma PNR med EU in Avstralijo ter Kanado, s katerima je zagotovljena višja raven varstva osebnih podatkov;
Regrets the fact that the EU negotiations with the US took no account of Directive 2004/82/EC or of the EU's PNR agreements with Australia and Canada, which ensure higher standards of protection of personal data;
obžaluje, da novi sporazum PNR ne določa natančnih meril, po katerih bi lahko opredelitev varovanja osebnih podatkov DHS ocenili kot ustrezno glede na standarde EU;
Regrets the failure of the new PNR agreement to lay down precise criteria for the definition of the protection of personal data transferred to the DHS which could be considered adequate according to EU standards;
obžaluje dejstvo, da se bo obdobje hrambe podatkov PNR s 3 in pol let podaljšalo na 15 let, kar bo retroaktivno veljalo tudi za podatke, zbrane po prejšnjih sporazumih o PNR; izreka odločno kritiko nad dejstvom, da po 15-letnem obdobju hrambe, sestavljenem iz 7-letnega "aktivnega" obdobja in 8-letnega "obdobja mirovanja", ni nobenih jamstev, da bodo podatki dokončno izbrisani;
Deplores the fact that the length of retention of PNR data will be extended from 3.5 years to 15 years, as well as this being retroactively applied to data collected under the previous PNR agreements; strongly criticises the fact that after the 15-year retention period, consisting of a 7-year 'active' and an 8-year 'dormant' period, there is no guarantee that the data will be definitively deleted;
je seznanjen s tem, da se je število podatkovnih polj s 34 zmanjšalo na 19, a poudarja, da je zmanjšanje v veliki meri zgolj kozmetično, saj so bila podatkovna polja združena in preimenovana, ne pa črtana;
Takes note of the reduction in data fields from 34 to 19, but points out that the reduction is largely cosmetic due to the merging and renaming of data fields instead of actual deletions;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da bo DHS razpolagal z občutljivimi podatki (tj. osebnimi podatki, ki kažejo na rasno ali narodnostno poreklo, politične nazore, verska ali filozofska prepričanja, članstvo v sindikatu, ter podatki v zvezi z zdravstvenim stanjem ali spolnim življenjem posameznikov) in da jih bo DHS lahko uporabljal v izjemnih primerih;
Notes with concern that sensitive data (i.e. personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, and data concerning the health or sex life of individuals), will be made available to the DHS and that these data may be used by the DHS in exceptional cases;
je zaskrbljen nad dejstvom, da bodo podatki v "aktivnih analitičnih zbirkah podatkov" shranjeni sedem let, kar vodi v precejšnjo nevarnost množičnega profiliranja in pridobivanja podatkov, kar je nezdružljivo s temeljnimi evropskimi načeli, poleg tega pa gre za prakso, o kateri še vedno poteka razprava v kongresu ZDA;
Is concerned that data will be kept for seven years in 'active analytical databases', leading to a significant risk of massive profiling and data mining, which is incompatible with basic European principles and is a practice still under discussion in the US Congress;
obžaluje, da v novem sporazumu PNR ni natančno opredeljeno, kateri organi ZDA lahko dostopajo do podatkov PNR;
Regrets the failure of the new PNR agreement to define precisely which US authorities may access the PNR data;
je zaskrbljen zaradi predvidenega prenosa analitičnih podatkov iz podatkov PNR od organov ZDA k policijskim in pravosodnim organom v državah članicah ter morebiti k Europolu in Eurojustu zunaj konkretnih pravosodnih postopkov ali policijskih preiskav, kot je omenjeno v pismu DHS, saj bi moralo biti to dovoljeno le v skladu z obstoječimi sporazumi med EU in ZDA o medsebojni pravni pomoči in izročitvah;
Is concerned at the envisaged transfer of analytical information flowing from PNR data from the US authorities to police and judicial authorities in the Member States, and possibly to Europol and Eurojust, outside the framework of specific judicial procedures or police investigations, as mentioned in the DHS letter, since this should only be allowed in accordance with the existing EU-US agreements on mutual legal assistance and extradition;
odločno nasprotuje določbi, da bi do podatkov PNR lahko dostopale vse tretje države, ki bi izpolnjevale specifične pogoje DHS, ter da bi te države izjemoma, v neopredeljenih izrednih primerih, lahko dostopale do podatkov PNR in to brez zagotovil, da bodo z njimi ravnale v skladu z ravnjo varstva podatkov DHS;
Strongly opposes the provision that third countries in general may be given access to PNR data if adhering to DHS-specified conditions, and that third countries may exceptionally, in unspecified emergency cases, be given access to PNR data without assurances that the data will be handled according to the DHS level of data protection;
obžaluje, da se je EU strinjala, da se ne vmešava glede varstva osebnih podatkov državljanov EU v primerih, ko bi ZDA podatke izmenjale s tretjimi državami;
Regrets the fact that the EU has accepted 'not to interfere' with regard to the protection of EU citizens' PNR data that may be shared by the US with third countries;
ugotavlja, da novi sporazum PNR omogoča, da DHS drugim vladnim organom ZDA posreduje podatke PNR v zvezi s konkretnimi primeri in v skladu z naravo primera; obžaluje, da v novem sporazumu PNR ni natančno navedeno, kateri organi ZDA lahko dostopajo do podatkov PNR, in da so cilji, predvideni v členu I pisma DHS, zelo široki;
Notes that the new PNR agreement allows the DHS to provide PNR data to other US domestic governmental authorities in relation to specific cases and in proportion to the nature of the case; regrets that the new PNR agreement lacks any indication as to which US authorities may access the PNR data and that the purposes set out in Article I of the DHS letter are very broad;
ugotavlja, da se novi sporazum PNR sklicuje na možni prihodnji sistem PNR na ravni EU oziroma ene ali več držav članic, in da navaja, da bi bili vsi podatki PNR iz takšnega sistema lahko na voljo DHS;
Notes that the new PNR agreement makes reference to a possible future PNR system at the level of the EU or in one or more of its Member States, and the provision that any PNR data in such a system may be made available to the DHS;
zahteva, da Komisija pojasni, ali se dejansko pripravlja evropski sistem PNR, vključno s predstavitvijo študije izvedljivosti, katere izvedbo je zagotovila;
Demands that the Commission clarify the state of play with regard to an EU PNR system, including making available the feasibility study it has pledged to undertake;
se pridružuje zaskrbljenosti, ki jo je delovna skupina iz člena 29 izrazila v zvezi z uporabo podatkov PNR za namene kazenskega pregona, in Komisijo poziva, da utemelji:
Repeats the concerns expressed by the Article 29 Working Party as regards the use of PNR data for law enforcement purposes, notably calling on the Commission to substantiate:
operativno potrebo in namen zbiranja podatkov PNR na točki vstopa na ozemlje EU;
the operational need and purpose of collecting PNR data at the point of entry into EU territory;
dodano vrednost zbiranja podatkov PNR v primerjavi z že obstoječimi kontrolnimi ukrepi na točki vstopa v EU za namene varnosti (schengenski sistem, vizumski informacijski sistem, sistem API);
the added value of collecting PNR data in the light of the already existing control measures at the point of entry into the EU for security purposes, such as the Schengen system, the Visa Information System, and the API system;
predvideno uporabo podatkov PNR, zlasti če bodo uporabljeni za identifikacijo oseb za namene zagotavljanja varnosti v letalskem prometu, za identifikacijo oseb, ki vstopajo na ozemlje EU, ali za splošno negativno ali pozitivno profiliranje potnikov;
the use that is envisaged for PNR data, in particular whether it is for identifying individuals in order to ensure air security, for identifying who enters the territory of the EU, or for general negative or positive profiling of passengers;
vztraja pri zahtevi, da pri vseh teh vprašanjih v skladu s členoma 71(1)(c) in 251 Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti sodeluje tudi Parlament;
Insists that Parliament be involved, pursuant to Articles 71(1)(c) and 251 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, in all relevant developments;
opozarja, da bo novi sporazum o PNR sčasoma treba pregledati glede na prihodnje institucionalne reforme EU, nakazane v sklepih Evropskega sveta junija 2007, in v skladu z mandatom prihodnje medvladne konference;
Recalls that the new PNR agreement will eventually have to be reviewed in the light of future EU institutional reforms, as outlined in the conclusions of the European Council of June 2007 and in the mandate for the next IGC;
namerava prositi za pravno oceno novega sporazuma PNR glede skladnosti z nacionalno zakonodajo in zakonodajo EU ter poziva delovno skupino iz člena 29 ter evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov, da pripravita izčrpni poročili v zvezi s tem;
Intends to seek a legal appraisal of the new PNR agreement for conformity with national and EU legislation, and invites the Article 29 Working Party and the European Data Protection Supervisor to present comprehensive opinions in this respect;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter kongresu ZDA.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and the US Congress.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. julija 2007 o letnem poročilu o euroobmočju za leto 2007 ( 2007/2143(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 12 July 2007 on the 2007 annual report on the eurozone ( 2007/2143(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije o letni izjavi o euroobmočju za leto 2007 ( KOM(2007)0231 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication on the Annual Statement on the Euro Area 2007 ( COM(2007)0231 ),
ob upoštevanju spomladanske gospodarske napovedi Komisije z dne 7. maja 2007,
having regard to the Commission's spring economic forecasts of 7 May 2007,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 14. marca 2006 o strateški reviziji Mednarodnega denarnega sklada, UL C 291 E, 30.11.2006, str.
having regard to its resolution of 14 March 2006 on the strategic review of the International Monetary Fund OJ C 291 E, 30.11.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila Evropske centralne banke (ECB) za leto 2006,
having regard to the 2006 Annual Report of the European Central Bank (ECB),
ob upoštevanju poročil ECB o finančnem povezovanju v Evropi iz marca 2007,
having regard to the ECB's reports on Financial Integration in Europe of March 2007,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0264/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0264/2007 ),
ker je BDP v euroobmočju leta 2006 v primerjavi z 1,4 % povečanjem leta 2005 narasel za 2,7 %, kar je najboljši dosežek po letu 2000, inflacija pa je ostala na ravni 2,2 % iz leta 2005,
whereas the GDP of the eurozone increased by 2,7 % in 2006, up from 1,4 % in 2005, which represents the best performance since 2000, whilst the inflation rate was 2,2 %, unchanged from 2005,
ker se je proračunski primanjkljaj v letu 2006 znižal z 2,5 % v letu 2005 na 1,6 % BDP,
whereas the fiscal deficit declined to 1,6 % of GDP in 2006 from 2,5 % of GDP in 2005,
ker se je stopnja brezposelnosti do konca leta 2006 znižala na 7,6 %, kar je najnižja raven v zadnjih 15 letih,
whereas the unemployment rate fell to 7,6 % by the end of 2006, its lowest level in 15 years,
ker članstvo v euroobmočju krepi stopnjo gospodarske soodvisnosti med državami članicami, zahteva tesnejše usklajevanje gospodarskih politik zaradi odpravljanja strukturnih pomanjkljivosti, kar bi omogočilo reševanje prihodnjih izzivov in prilagoditev euroobmočja na vedno bolj globalizirano gospodarstvo,
whereas membership of the eurozone strengthens the degree of economic interdependence between Member States and calls for a closer coordination of economic policies in order to correct structural weaknesses, to face future challenges and to assimilate the eurozone with an increasingly globalised economy,
ker euroobmočje predstavlja ključni element stabilnosti v svetovnem gospodarstvu,
whereas the eurozone represents a core element of stability in the global economy,
pozdravlja ugodna gospodarska gibanja v letu 2006 na področju gospodarske rasti in zaposlenosti, kar je omogočilo nastanek 2 milijonov novih delovnih mest in zmanjšalo proračunski primanjkljaj; vendar poudarja, da visoka stopnja nezaposlenosti in nizka udeležba na trgu dela Evropi ne omogočata uspešnega reševanja trenutnih in bodočih izzivov svetovnega gospodarstva;
Welcomes the favourable economic developments achieved in 2006 in terms of growth and employment, resulting in the creation of 2 million new jobs and lower fiscal deficits; points out however that high unemployment levels and low participation in labour markets do not allow Europe to respond successfully to current and future challenges in a global economy;
v zvezi s tem opozarja, da člen 111 Pogodbe pooblašča Svet za oblikovanje politike deviznih tečajev, ne da bi natančno določal sredstva za izvajanje te pristojnosti; poziva Euroskupino, Svet in ECB, da v celoti izvajajo svoje pristojnosti;
Recalls in this connection that Article 111 of the Treaty confers responsibility for exchange rate policy on the Council, without specifying the means by which this power should be exercised; calls on the Euro Group, the Council and the ECB to exercise their respective powers to the full;
ugotavlja, da je ponovna gospodarska rast deloma rezultat strukturnih izboljšav, in pozdravlja dejstvo, da produktivnost faktorja dela hitreje narašča; vendar meni, da je še prezgodaj, da bi lahko z gotovostjo trdili, ali je okrevanje gospodarstva bolj ciklične ali bolj strukturne narave; s tem v zvezi meni, da je treba biti previden;
Notes that part of the recovery is driven by structural improvements and welcomes the fact that labour productivity is increasing at a higher rate; considers, however, that it is too early to draw firm conclusions as to whether the recovery is more cyclical or more structural in nature; calls for a cautious stance in this regard;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so si članice euroobmočja močno prizadevale za odpravo čezmernih proračunskih primanjkljajev v skladu s prenovljenim Paktom stabilnosti in rasti; poudarja, da Komisija meni, da se je v celotnem euroobmočju kakovost prilagoditve povečala, ob tem pa je bila odvisnosti od enkratnih ukrepov manjša, zmanjšali so se tudi javni izdatki; zlasti poudarja, da so prizadevanja za konsolidacijo, zlasti v državah s čezmernimi primanjkljaji, in izboljšanje gospodarskega položaja, znižala proračunski primanjkljaj v euroobmočju z 2,5 % BDP v letu 2005 na 1,6 % BDP v letu 2006;
Welcomes the fact that eurozone members have made a concerted effort to correct excessive budget deficits in accordance with the reformed Stability and Growth Pact; highlights the fact that the Commission considers that in the eurozone as a whole the quality of the adjustment has increased, with less reliance on one-off measures and a decrease in public expenditure; stresses, in particular, that the combination of consolidation efforts, notably in countries with excessive deficits, and improved economic developments have reduced the budget deficit of the eurozone to 1,6 % of GDP in 2006, down from 2,5 % of GDP in 2005;
vztraja, da je dobra fiskalna politika predpogoj za trajnostno rast in ustvarjanje novih delovnih mest, saj nizki proračunski primanjkljaji in javni dolgovi spodbujajo nizko in stabilno stopnjo inflacije ter prispevajo k ohranjanju nizkih obrestnih mer; opozarja, da se napake, do katerih je prišlo pri ukrepih iz obdobja 1999–2001, ne smejo ponoviti; zato poziva, da se izkoristi trenutni gospodarski razmah na dva načina, da se tako doseže sledeče: odpravi primanjkljaje in kopičenje presežkov, s katerimi bi zmanjšali raven zadolženosti in izboljšali javno financiranje s tem, da se vlaga več v izobraževanje, poklicno usposabljanje, infrastrukturo, raziskave in inovacije, kar bo pomagalo pri soočanju z izzivi glede staranja prebivalstva; s tem v zvezi pozdravlja dejstvo, da je dne 20. aprila 2007 Euroskupina sprejela smernice za fiskalno politiko v državah članicah iz euroobmočja, in opozarja na obvezo za aktivno in pravočasno konsolidiranje javnih ter za uporabo nepredvidenih dodatnih prihodkov za zmanjševanje primanjkljaja in dolga;
Insists that sound fiscal policy is a pre-condition for sustained growth and job creation since low budget deficits and government debt foster low and stable inflationary expectations and help maintain low interest rates; warns against repeating the policy mistakes of 1999-2001; calls, therefore, for the current upswing to be used in two ways in order to achieve the following: the elimination of deficits and the accumulation of surpluses, which would reduce debt levels, and the improvement of the quality of public finance by investing more in education, vocational training, infrastructure, and research and innovation, which would assist in helping to meet the challenges posed by an ageing population; welcomes in this respect the fact that on 20 April 2007 the Eurogroup adopted orientations for fiscal policies in eurozone Member States, recalling the commitment to actively consolidate public finances in good times and to use unexpected extra revenues for deficit and debt reduction;
poudarja tveganja, ki ga prociklične politike lahko imajo v nekaterih državah članicah; je seznanjen s prizadevanji za konsolidacija javnih financ v celotnem euroobmočju; vendar poudarja, da obveza za doseganje srednjeročnega cilja, kot je bila opredeljena v reformiranem Paktu stabilnosti in rasti, od držav članic zahteva, da imajo v času dobrih gospodarskih razmer presežke; meni, da je treba prizadevanja za konsolidacijo še okrepiti zaradi, med drugim, prihodnjih demografskih izzivov; ugotavlja, da reformirani pakt stabilnosti in rasti izrecno zahteva fiskalno konsolidacijo gospodarskega cikla; ugotavlja, da postopkovna in numerična proračunska pravila in neodvisne davčne institucije podpirajo konsolidacijo javnih financ in pomagajo preprečevati prociklično politiko;
Stresses the risks posed by pro-cyclical policies in some Member States; takes note of the fiscal consolidation effort observed in the eurozone as a whole; insists, however, that the obligation to achieve the medium-term objective, as specified in the reformed Stability and Growth Pact, requires Member States to run surpluses during good times; believes that the consolidation effort needs to be strengthened in light of, inter alia, the demographic challenge to come; notes that the reformed Stability and Growth Pact explicitly requires fiscal consolidation over the economic cycle; notes that procedural or numerical fiscal rules and independent fiscal institutions support fiscal consolidation and help avoid pro-cyclical policies;
seznanja se s Sklepom ECB iz leta 2006 o nadaljnjem povečevanju obrestnih mer; ugotavlja, da je stopnja rasti monetarnega agregata M3 od leta 2001 dosledno močno presegala referenčno vrednost 4,5 % odstotkov, čeprav je bila inflacija nespremenjena kljub dvigu cen električne energije; poziva ECB, da bolje pojasni, kakšni so razlogi za to neskladje in ali je to znak rastoče likvidnosti, ki bi v prihodnosti lahko pospešila rast inflacije, ali posledica drugih dejavnikov, kot so poglabljanje finančnih trgov, finančne inovacije in vse večja vloga evra v mednarodnem merilu;
Takes note of the ECB's decision in 2006 to further increase interest rates; observes that, although inflation remained contained despite a surge in energy prices, the growth rate of monetary aggregate M3 has systematically exceeded the reference value of 4,5 % by large margins ever since 2001 without accelerating inflation; calls on the ECB to explain better the reasons for this discrepancy and whether it is a symptom of growing liquidity with the potential to fuel inflation in future or a result of other factors, such as the deepening of financial markets, financial innovations and the increasingly international role of the euro;