natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da se lahko občutljivi podatki uporabijo le pri redni preiskavi ali kazenskem pregonu na podlagi sodnega naloga in za vsak primer posebej; se zaveda zaskrbljenosti letalskih prevoznikov, da občutljivih podatkov ne bo mogoče ločiti od splošnih informacij; zato poziva k opredelitvi strogih pogojev za obdelavo teh podatkov v enotah za informacije o potnikih, kakor je v svojem mnenju zapisala Agencija za temeljne pravice;
Emphasises that sensitive data may be used only on a case-by-case basis in the context of a regular investigation or prosecution, obtained under a warrant; notes the concern of airlines that sensitive data cannot be filtered from general remarks; calls, therefore, for the definition of strict conditions for the processing of these data by PIUs, as defined by the FRA in its opinion;
glede dolžine hranjenja podatkov poudarja, da Komisija ni zadovoljivo utemeljila predlaganega obdobja hrambe; meni pa, da bi morali za oblikovanje kazalnikov tveganja in vzpostavljanje potovalnih in vedenjskih vzorcev zadostovati anonimni podatki; meni tudi, da če se področje uporabe sistema za evidenco PNR razširi, je treba obdobja hrambe utemeljiti za vsak cilj posebej;
Stresses that, as regards storage periods, the Commission fails to justify the proposed retention period; considers, however, that for the purpose of developing risk indicators and establishing patterns of travel and behaviour, anonymised data should be sufficient; considers also that, if the scope of the PNR scheme is extended, retention periods must be justified for each separate purpose;
ponovno poudarja, da bi morali podatke prenašati zgolj z metodo PUSH in da tretje države ne bi smele imeti neposrednega dostopa do evidence PNR v EU sistemih za rezervacije;
Reiterates that data transfers should be made using the PUSH method alone and that third countries should not have direct access to PNR data in EU reservation systems;
pozdravlja, da je glede dostopa do podatkov iz evidence PNR v predlogu zapisano, da morajo biti vsi subjekti z dostopom do teh podatkov navedeni na podrobnem seznamu;
Welcomes the fact that, as regards access to PNR data, the proposal states that all entities having access to PNR data should be named in an exhaustive list;
poudarja, da se glede prenosov v tretje države podatki ne smejo posredovati v tretje države, razen če zadevne tretje države (v skladu s Konvencijo št. 108) ne zagotovijo ustrezne ravni varstva (kot je opredeljeno v Direktivi 95/46/ES in pravnih instrumentih za ustanovitev Europola in Eurojusta) ali ustreznih varoval, in da se lahko ti prenosi izvedejo samo za vsak primer posebej;
Stresses, as regards transfers to third countries, that data may not be transferred to third countries unless an adequate level of protection (as specified in Directive 95/46/EC and the legal instruments establishing Europol and Eurojust) or appropriate safeguards are provided by the third countries concerned (in accordance with Convention 108), and that transfers should be made only on a case-by-case basis;
ponovno poudarja, da morajo biti potniki celovito in na dostopen način obveščeni o podrobnostih tega sistema in o svojih pravicah ter da so za zagotovitev teh informacij odgovorni organi držav članic; predlaga, naj se za to uporabi zgled informacij o zavrnitvi vkrcanja na letališčih; meni, da je bistveno, da se za potnike opredeli pravica do dostopa, popravka in pritožbe;
Reiterates that passengers must be informed in full and in an accessible manner of the details of the scheme and of their rights, and that Member State authorities are responsible for providing this information; suggests that the example of the 'denied boarding' information in airports should be used; considers it essential to define a right of access, rectification and appeal for passengers;
poziva, naj se opredelijo natančna in usklajena pravila za zaščito podatkov iz evidenc PNR, tako glede IT rešitev kot glede pravil o pooblastilih in dostopanju;
Requests that detailed and harmonised rules be laid down on the security of PNR data, in terms of both IT solutions and authorisation and access rules;
ugotavlja, da letalski prevozniki zbirajo podatke o letalskih potnikih za komercialne namene, ki pa se ne zbirajo sistematično in ne zajemajo vseh področij evidence PNR; vztraja, da se od letalskih družb ne bi smelo zahtevati, da zbirajo dodatne podatke poleg tistih, ki jih že zbirajo za svoje komercialne namene; meni, da letalski prevozniki ne bi smeli biti odgovorni za preverjanje, ali so evidence popolne in točne, niti ne bi smelo biti sankcij za nepopolne ali nepravilne podatke; poziva, naj se jasno ovrednotijo stroški, povezani z vzpostavljanjem EU PNR sitema; meni, da bi morale dodatne stroške kriti tisti, ki so jih zahtevali;
33 Notes that air carriers collect PNR data for commercial purposes and that data are not systematically collected to complete all PNR fields; insists that airlines should not be required to collect any data additional to those which they are collecting for their commercial purposes; considers that air carriers should not be made responsible for verifying whether records are complete and accurate, nor should any sanctions be applied in respect of incomplete or incorrect data; calls for a clear evaluation of the costs involved in an EU PNR scheme; considers that any additional costs should be borne by the requesting parties;
poziva k jasni opredelitvi vloge in pristojnosti enot za informacije o potnikih, zlasti glede preglednosti in demokratične odgovornosti, zato da bi postavili ustrezna pravila za varstvo podatkov; poziva, naj se vloga teh enot omeji na prenos podatkov pristojnim organom, zato da se zagotovi, da bodo ocene tveganja izvajali zgolj pristojni organi in zgolj v okviru preiskave; prosi za pojasnitev, katero pravo bo veljalo za ocene tveganja, ki jih bodo izvajale te enote, in za odgovornost organov za varstvo podatkov, kadar bodo države članice sodelovale in vzpostavile skupne enote za informacije o potnikih;
Calls for a clear definition of the role and powers of the PIUs, in particular in terms of transparency and democratic accountability and in order to lay down appropriate data protection rules; requests that the role of PIUs be limited to the transfer of data to competent authorities, in order to ensure that risk assessments may only be carried out by competent authorities and in the context of an inquiry; asks for clarification of the law which will govern the risk assessment conducted by the PIUs, and the responsibility of data protection authorities in cases where Member States cooperate to set up a joint PIU;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Evropskemu nadzorniku za varstvo podatkov, Agenciji za temeljne pravice ter delovni skupini iz člena 29 in delovni skupini za policijo in pravosodje.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the European Data Protection Supervisor, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the Article 29 Working Party and the Working Party on Police and Justice.
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z dne 31. oktobra 2008 za Uredbo Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 332/2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic ( KOM(2008)0717 ),
having regard to the Commission's proposal of 31 October 2008 for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States" balances of payments ( COM(2008)0717 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije z 31. oktobra 2008 za Odločbo Sveta o zagotavljanju vzajemne pomoči Madžarski in predloga Odločbe Sveta o zagotavljanju srednjeročne pomoči EU za Madžarsko ( KOM(2008)0716 ),
having regard to the Commission's recommendation of 31 October 2008 for a Council decision granting mutual assistance for Hungary and proposal for a Council decision providing EU medium-term assistance for Hungary ( COM(2008)0716 ),
ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 332/2002 z 18. februarja 2002 o ustanovitvi aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic UL L 53, 23.2.2002, str.
having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States" balances of payments OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p.
in resolucije Parlamenta z dne 6. septembra 2001 o srednjeročni finančni pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic UL C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
and Parliament's resolution of 6 September 2001 on medium-term financial assistance for Member States" balances of payments OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 100 in 119 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 100 and 119 of the EC Treaty,
ker Komisija priporoča dodelitev srednjeročne finančne pomoči Madžarski v višini do 6 500 000 000 EUR na podlagi člena 119 Pogodbe, v povezavi z dogovorom z Mednarodnim denarnim skladom,
whereas the Commission recommends granting medium-term financial assistance to Hungary of up to EUR 6 500 000 000 on the basis of Article 119 of the Treaty, in conjunction with an IMF arrangement,
ker so bile valute teh držav članic nedavno predmet silovitih špekulativnih dejavnosti in ker je razlog za velikost sedanjih zunanjih neravnovesij zlasti velik porast nevladnih kreditov,
whereas the currencies of those Member States have recently been subjected to powerful speculative action and the magnitude of the current external imbalances has been driven primarily by a strong expansion of non-governmental credit,
ker mora politika obravnavati posebne probleme gospodarstev teh držav članic v luči svetovne finančne krize in širjenja recesije v Evropi,
whereas there is a need for policies to address the specific problems of those Member States" economies against the backdrop of the global financial crisis and a spreading recession in Europe,
ker je morda manevrski prostor, ki ga za spopad z velikim zunanjim neravnovesjem in za preprečevanje finančne nestabilnosti dovoljuje proračunska politika, dokaj omejen glede na gospodarsko recesijo, ki se širi po Evropski uniji,
whereas the budget policy room for manoeuvre in addressing large external imbalances and preventing financial instability may be quite limited against the backdrop of the current economic recession spreading across the European Union,
meni, da je treba države članice, ki niso v euroobmočju, spodbuditi, da pred iskanjem pomoči na mednarodni ravni možno srednjeročno finančno pomoč pri primanjkljaju v plačilni bilanci poiščejo znotraj Skupnosti;
Believes that Member States outside the euro area should be encouraged to look for potential medium-term financial assistance in respect of their balance of payments deficits within the Community before seeking assistance at international level;
meni, da so sedanje razmere še en dokaz za pomembnost eura pri varovanju držav članic v euroobmočju in poziva države članice, ki niso v tem območju, naj se mu pridružijo takoj, ko bodo izpolnjevale maastrichtska merila;
Considers the current situation to be further proof of the relevance of the euro in protecting the Member States in the euro area and invites the Member States outside the euro area to join it as soon as they fulfil the Maastricht criteria;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno analizira, kako je na madžarsko plačilno bilanco vplivalo vedenje posameznih bank, ki so prenesle svoja sredstva z Madžarske po sprejetju načrtov za reševanje v drugih državah članicah;
Invites the Commission to analyse in detail in what way the behaviour of individual banks that moved their assets from Hungary after adoption of rescue plans by other Member States has impacted on Hungary's balance of payments;
poziva Komisijo, naj natančno preuči špekulativne dejavnosti (kratkoročno prodajo) na valute držav članic, ki so pristopile nedavno, in kaj je mogoče storiti, da se prepreči izrazit upad zaupanja v njihove valute in lokalni bančni sistem;
Invites the Commission to examine carefully the speculative action (short-selling) on the currencies of the more recently acceded Member States and what might be done to prevent a drastic erosion of confidence in their currencies and the local banking systems;
poziva Komisijo, naj rezultate teh analiz sporoči skupini de Larosière in pristojnemu odboru Parlamenta;
Invites the Commission to communicate the results of those analyses to the de Larosière group and to Parliament's responsible committee;
priznava, da je treba znatno povečati zgornjo mejo za neporavnane zneske iz posojil, ki se odobrijo državam članicam, določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 332/2002, saj je od njenega sprejetja število držav članic zunaj euroobmočja znatno naraslo; poudarja, da bi to povečanje prav tako izboljšalo prožnost Skupnosti pri odzivanju na nove zahteve za srednjeročno finančno pomoč, na primer zaradi sedanje svetovne finančne krize;
Recognises that it is necessary to increase significantly the ceiling for the outstanding amount in loans to be granted to Member States laid down in Regulation (EC) No 332/2002, given that, since its adoption, the number of Member States outside the euro area has increased substantially; underlines that such an increase would also enhance the Community's flexibility in responding to further requests for medium-term financial assistance such as in the context of the current global financial crisis;
ugotavlja, da takšno povečanje zgornje meje za posojila ne bi vplivalo na proračun, saj bi posojila vzela Komisija na finančnih trgih, države članice upravičenke pa bi jih morale povrniti; poudarja, da bi samo v primeru, če bi država članica ustavila plačilo dolga, to imelo posledice za proračun;
Notes that there would be no budgetary impact of such an increase of the loan ceiling because the loans would be borrowed by the Commission on the financial markets and the beneficiary Member States would have to repay them; stresses that the only possible budgetary impact would be that arising from a Member State defaulting on its debt;
opozarja, da se pred sedanjimi finančnimi težavami Madžarske Uredba (ES) št. 332/2002 od sprejetja leta 2002 še ni uporabila, njena predhodnica Uredba (EGS) št. 1969/88 UL L 178, 8.7.1988, str.
Recalls that, before Hungary's current financial difficulties Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 had not been applied since its adoption in 2002, and that its predecessor, Regulation (EEC) No 1969/88 OJ L 178, 8.7.1988, p.
o izvajanju mehanizma iz člena 119 Pogodbe pa je bila uporabljena dvakrat, enkrat za Grčijo leta 1991 in enkrat za Italijo leta 1993, tako Grčija kot Italija pa sta v celoti spoštovali svoje obveznosti do Komisije;
implementing the mechanism foreseen by the Article 119 of the Treaty, was applied twice, once for Greece in 1991 and once for Italy in 1993, and that Greece and Italy have fully respected their commitments to the Commission;
spominja, da je Parlament pozval, naj Svet vsaki dve leti na podlagi poročila Komisije, po posvetovanju s Parlamentom in po predložitvi mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora pregleda, ali ustanovljeni aranžma zadovoljuje potrebe, zaradi katerih je bil ustanovljen; sprašuje, ali so bila ta poročila pripravljena od sprejetja Uredbe (ES) št. 332/2002;
Recalls that Parliament requested that the Council examine, every two years, on the basis of a report from the Commission, after consulting Parliament and after the delivery of the Economic and Financial Committee's opinion, whether the facility established still meets the needs which led to its creation; asks whether such reports have been drawn up since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 332/2002;
B6-0590 , 0592 , 0593 , 0594 in 0595/2008
B6-0590 , 0592 , 0593 , 0594 and 0595/2008
ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta Evropske unije o razmerah v Demokratični republiki Kongo(Kongo) z dne 11. novembra 2008,
having regard to the Conclusions of the Council of the European Union on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) of 11 November 2008,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. oktobra 2008 z naslovom "Demokratična republika Kongo: spopadi na območju vzhodne meje Demokratične republike Kongo" Sprejeta besedila P6_TA(2008)0526 .
having regard to its resolution of 23 October 2008 on the Democratic Republic of Congo: clashes in the eastern border areas of the DRC Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0526 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o Severnem Kivuju Sprejeta besedila P6_TA(2008)0072 .
having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on North Kivu Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0072 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. januarja 2008 o razmerah v Demokratični republiki Kongo ter o posilstvu kot vojnem zločinu Sprejeta besedila P6_TA(2008)0022 .
having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2008 on the situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo and rape as a war crime Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2008)0022 .
in svojih prejšnjih resolucij o kršenju človekovih pravic v Kongu,
and its previous resolutions on violations of human rights in the DRC,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. novembra 2007 o odzivu Evropske unije na občutljive razmere v državah v razvoju UL C 282 E, 6.11.2008, str.
having regard to its resolution of 15 November 2007 on the European Union's response to situations of fragility in developing countries OJ C 282 E, 6.11.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 25. oktobra 2007 z naslovom "Korak k odzivu EU na primere ranljivosti – zavzemanje za trajnostni razvoj, stabilnost in mir v težkih razmerah" ( KOM(2007)0643 ) in priloženega delovnega dokumenta služb Komisije ( SEK(2007)1417 ),
having regard to the Commission communication of 25 October 2007 entitled "Towards an EU response to situations of fragility – engaging in difficult environments for sustainable development, stability and peace" ( COM(2007)0643 ) and the Commission staff working document annexed thereto ( SEC(2007)1417 ),
ob upoštevanju Resolucije 60/1 generalne skupščine Združenih narodov z dne 24. oktobra 2005 o sklepih svetovnega vrha iz leta 2005, zlasti njenih odstavkov 138–140 o odgovornosti za zaščito prebivalstva,
having regard to Resolution 60/1 of the United Nations General Assembly of 24 October 2005 on the 2005 World Summit Outcome, and in particular paragraphs 138 to 140 on the responsibility to protect populations,
ob upoštevanju sklepov vrha Južnoafriške skupnosti za razvoj, ki je izrazila pripravljenost, da, če bo potrebno, v Severni Kivu pošlje pripadnike mirovnih sil,
having regard to the conclusions of the Southern African Development Community summit, which stated that it was prepared to send peace-keeping troops to North Kivu "if necessary",
ob upoštevanju Izjave Sveta glede razmer v vzhodnem delu Demokratične republike Kongo z dne 10. oktobra 2008,
having regard to the Council statement of 10 October 2008 on the situation in the eastern part of the DRC,
ob upoštevanju poročila misije svojega Odbora za razvoj v Severnem Kivuju leta 2008,
having regard to the report of the mission by its Committee on Development to North Kivu in 2008,
ob upoštevanju evropskega soglasja o humanitarni pomoči, ki je bilo podpisano dne 18. decembra 2007,
having regard to the European Consensus on Humanitarian Aid signed on 18 December 2007,
ker se boji med kongovsko vojsko, milico Mai Mai, uporniškimi četami(Nacionalni kongres ljudsko obrambo) odstavljenega generala Laurenta Nkunde, borci Demokratičnih sil za osvoboditev Ruande in borci Gospodove odporniške vojske Ugande zaostrujejo in še vedno povzročajo izjemno stisko za civilno prebivalstvo Severnega Kivuja,
whereas the fighting between the DRC army, the Mai Mai militia, the rebel troops (National Congress for the Defence of the People (CNDP)) of ousted General Laurent Nkunda and the fighters of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) as well as troops of Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army has been escalating and continues to cause tremendous hardship to the civilian populations of North Kivu,
ker je misija pod vodstvom nekdanjega nigerijskega predsednika Oluseguna Obasanja, odposlanca Organizacije združenih narodov, v nedeljo 16. novembra 2008 dosegla dogovor z vodjem upornikov Laurentom Nkundo, da se oblikuje tristranski odbor za spoštovanje premirja med vojsko in uporniki, in ker ta misija nujno potrebuje podporo partnerskih sil zadevnih držav, da se določi rešitev,
whereas on Sunday, 16 November 2008, the UN envoy, former Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, met with the rebel leader Laurent Nkunda and reached an agreement with him on the creation of a tripartite committee to monitor a ceasefire between the army and the rebels, and whereas there is an urgent need for support from the powers which are partners of the countries involved, with a view to ensuring a solution,
ker potekajo intenzivna mednarodna diplomatska prizadevanja, v katera so vključeni regionalni in evropski posredniki, njihov cilj pa je preprečiti, da bi se spopadi v Severnem Kivuju stopnjevali in bi se ponovila obsežnejša vojna v DR Kongo med leti 1998 in 2003, v kateri je bilo udeleženih šest sosednjih držav; ker je bil dne 7. novembra 2008 v Nairobiju organiziran regionalni vrh o krizi v vzhodnem delu države,
whereas intense international diplomatic efforts involving regional and European facilitators are under way, with the aim of preventing the fighting in North Kivu from escalating into a repeat of the wider 1998-2003 Congo war, which involved six neighbouring states; whereas a regional summit on the crisis in the east of the DRC was organised on 7 November 2008 in Nairobi,
ker je bilo od začetka nasilja ubitih in razseljenih na milijone ljudi in ker je bilo – odkar je general Laurent Nkunda avgusta ponovno sprožil spopade Kongu, ki so povzročili humanitarno katastrofo v vzhodnem delu Konga – po ocenah razseljenih 250 000 oseb,
whereas since the beginning of the violence millions of people have been killed and displaced and whereas an estimated 250 000 have been displaced since the resumption of fighting in the DRC by General Laurent Nkunda in August 2008, causing a humanitarian catastrophe in the east of the country,
ker kljub svojemu mandatu v skladu s poglavjem VII Listine Združenih narodov, ki jo pooblašča, da uporabi vsa potreba sredstva, da bi preprečila vse poskuse uporabe sile in zaščitila civilno prebivalstvo, misija Združenih narodov za Demokratično republiko Kongo(MONUC):
whereas in spite of its mandate by virtue of Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, authorising the use of all necessary means to discourage all attempts to use force, and to protect civilians, the United Nations Mission in the DRC (MONUC):
ni imela potrebnih sredstev, da zaščiti civiliste odkar so se ponovno začeli spopadi v vzhodnem delu Demokratične republike Kongo ter razoroži in prisilno vrne hutujske borce iz Ruande, ki se nahajajo v Kongu;
has not had the necessary means to protect civilians since the recent resumption of fighting in the east of the DRC and to disarm and repatriate the Hutu fighters from Rwanda who are present on DRC territory,
je bila prisiljena, da čaka na pristanek Indije in Pakistana, da bi v boj poslali indijske in pakistanske vojake, kar ni v skladu z določbami mandata, zaradi česar je bila napotena;
has been forced to wait for the green light from India and Pakistan to send Indian and Pakistani soldiers into combat, contrary to the provisions of the mandate on the basis of which MONUC has been deployed in the DRC,
ni posredovala, da bi zaustavila pokol več kot 200 ljudi dne 5. novembra 2008 v kraju Kiwandja, kljub temu, da se tam nahaja ena njenih vojaških baz,
did not intervene to stop the massacre of more than 200 people which took place on 5 November 2008 in Kiwanja despite the fact that one of its military bases is located there,
ker je varnostni svet Združenih narodov o razmerah na vzhodu DR Kongo še enkrat razpravljal dne 11. novembra 2008, vendar se ni sporazumel o okrepitvi misije Združenih narodov v Demokratični republiki Kongo (MONUC) z dodatnimi 3000 vojaki, kot je ta misija zahtevala,
whereas the UN Security Council discussed the situation in eastern DRC once again on 11 November 2008 without agreeing to reinforce MONUC with an additional 3 000 troops as requested by MONUC,