natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja, da evropska pobuda na področju nepravilnega trgovanja ni potrebna, saj v državah članicah že obstajajo zadevna pravila; čeprav se ta pravila v državah članicah lahko razlikujejo, nacionalne razlike ne predstavljajo nobene ovire za notranji trg;
States that there is no need for a European initiative in the field of wrongful trading since there are already relevant regulations in the Member States; although those regulations in the Members States may vary, the national differences constitute no obstacle to the internal market;
poziva Komisijo, da pripravi predlog za razslojitev obveznosti razkritja lastniških deležev; bi pozdravil razdelitev na naslednje odstotne stopnje: 3 %, 5 %, 10 %, 15 % in 20 %, skupaj z obvezno prijavo za vsako odstotno točko nad 20 %; ugotavlja, da bo razdelitev obveznosti razkritja na stopnje posledično pripomogla tudi k večji preglednosti lastništva delnic;
Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for the differentiation of obligations to disclose share-holding levels; would welcome a differentiation which provided for the following percentage steps: 3%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%, plus a notification obligation for every percentage point above 20%; notes that the differentiation of disclosure obligations would necessarily improve transparency concerning shareholding;
poziva Komisijo, da določi jasna pravila, ki bodo urejala prehodna obdobja, tj. "dostojne intervale", po katerih aktivni člani upravnega odbora, ki želijo biti ob odhodu iz upravnega odbora premeščeni v nadzorni odbor (v dualističnem sistemu) ali v neizvršni odbor (v monističnem sistemu), to lahko storijo; ugotavlja, da morajo ta prehodna obdobja trajati vsaj dve leti; poudarja pomen takšnih prehodnih obdobij pri ohranjanju neodvisnosti nadzornih odborov;
Calls on the Commission to lay down clear rules governing transitional periods, i.e. the "decent interval" after which active members of the management board who wish, on leaving the board, to transfer to the supervisory board (in the dualistic system) or the non-executive board (in the monistic system), may do so; notes that these transitional periods must be at least two years; stresses the importance of such transitional periods in preserving the independence of supervisory boards;
poziva Komisijo, naj zakonodajna vprašanja, kot je neodvisnost direktorjev, raje rešuje s pomočjo zakonodajnih sredstev (direktiv), kot pa s priporočili, saj so na ta način vključeni tudi javnost in zakonodajni organi, sprejeta pravila pa odražajo dejansko prakso;
Calls on the Commission to resolve legislative issues, such as the independence of directors, by legislative means (directives) rather than by recommendations, so that the public and the legislature are involved and the resulting rules reflect actual practice;
poziva Komisijo, naj bo pozorna na navzkrižje interesov ter nesorazmerno kopičenje informacij in vpliva nekaterih velikih udeležencev iz verige posrednikov in svetovalcev, ki sodelujejo pri uveljavljanju glasovalnih pravic delničarjev v podjetjih, ter poudarja, da je za obrambo izdajateljev pred nepotrebno koncentracijo in usklajenim delovanjem delničarskih strank potrebna preglednost in poštene možnosti;
Urges the Commission to be alert to conflicts of interests and the disproportional accumulation of information and influence by some large players in the chain of intermediaries and advisors involved in the exercise of shareholders' voting rights in companies, and stresses the need for transparency and fair opportunities for issuers to defend themselves against the undue concentration and coordinated action of shareholder parties;
poziva k jasnemu regulativnemu režimu za razkritja in primerljivost podatkov o posameznih plačah direktorjev in plačnih politikah za direktorje, vključno z elementi, kot so pokojninsko zavarovanje in nagrajevanje z delniškimi opcijami;
Asks for a clear regulatory regime for the disclosure and comparability of information on the individual remuneration of, and remuneration policy for, directors, including elements such as pension schemes and stock-option plans;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da lahko družbe izbirajo med različnimi sistemi upravljanja, vključno z enotirnim in dvotirnim sistemom, brez potrebe po sprejetju določil o pristojnostih in obveznostih upravnih organov družbe;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that companies are given the choice between different governance systems, including the one-tier and two-tier systems, without there being any need to adopt provisions defining the powers and obligations of a company's governing bodies;
poziva Komisijo, da pregleda možnosti za revizijo pravil v statutu evropskega podjetja o ustanavljanju takšnih družb za poenostavljanje teh pravil in njihovo prilagajanje zahtevam trga;
Calls on the Commission to examine the possibilities for revision of the rules in the Statute for a European company on the formation of such companies, with a view to simplifying those rules and adjusting them in line with market requirements;
poziva Komisijo, da predloži predlog o evropski zasebni družbi, da se izpolnijo potrebe MSP;
Calls on the Commission to present a proposal on the European private company in order to meet the needs of SMEs;
močno obžaluje dejstvo, da se je Komisija že odločila, da umakne dva predloga Uredbe o statutu evropskega združenja ( 1991/0386(COD) ) in Uredbe o statutu evropske vzajemne družbe ( 1991/0390(COD) ) ter dva predloga direktiv o dopolnitvi teh statutov glede udeležbe delavcev ( 1991/0387(COD) in 1991/0391(COD) );
Strongly deplores the fact that the Commission has already decided to withdraw the two proposals for a regulation on a Statute for a European association ( 1991/0386(COD) ) and for a regulation on a Statute for a European mutual society ( 1991/0390(COD) ) and the two proposals for directives supplementing those Statutes with regard to the involvement of employees ( 1991/0387(COD) and 1991/0391(COD) );
vendar ugotavlja, da je Komisija v svojem akcijskem načrtu 2003 izrazila namero, da bo dejavno podpirala zakonodajni postopek, ki se izvaja v zvezi s temi statuti, kot odziv na željo, ki jo je izrazil Parlament, da naj se posebna pozornost nameni razvoju novih pravnih oblik podjetij; meni, da so ti predlogi koristni instrumenti za razvoj gospodarske dejavnosti v vsej Evropi s strani združenj in vzajemnih družb;
Notes, however, that, in its 2003 Action Plan, the Commission announced its intention actively to support the legislative process undertaken in relation to those statutes, in response to the desire expressed by Parliament for significant attention to be given to the development of new legal forms of enterprises; regards those proposals as useful instruments for the development of economic activity throughout Europe by associations and mutual societies;
poziva Komisijo, da predloži nove predloge za statute evropskih vzajemnih družb in evropskih združenj;
Calls on the Commission to submit new proposals for statutes for European mutual societies and European associations;
poudarja, da je prenos registriranega sedeža pravne ali fizične osebe danes nemogoč ali oviran zaradi zahtev, določenih na nacionalni ravni, da je direktiva na tem področju bistvena za svobodo ustanavljanja in da bi dolgo pričakovana štirinajsta direktiva na področju prava družb zapolnila vrzel v sistemu notranjega trga za družbe;
Stresses that the transfer of a registered office is today either impossible or hindered by the requirements imposed at national level, that a directive in this area is crucial for freedom of establishment, and that the long-awaited Fourteenth Company Law Directive would fill a lacuna in the system of the internal market for companies;
zato poziva Komisijo, da v bližnji prihodnosti predloži predlog v zvezi s štirinajsto direktivo na področju prava družb o čezmejnem prenosu registriranega sedeža družb z omejeno odgovornostjo; poudarja, da se prenos registriranih sedežev ne sme uporabljati napačno, recimo za omejevanje pravic delavcev, zlasti v zvezi z udeležbo delavcev pri odločitvah družbe, ali za zmanjševanje zaščite upnikov; še zlasti meni, da mora biti varovanje pridobljenih pravic delavcev v zvezi z njihovo udeležbo pri odločitvah družbe jasen cilj direktive;
Therefore calls on the Commission to present in the near future a proposal concerning the Fourteenth Company Law Directive on the cross-border transfer of the registered office of limited companies; stresses that the transfer of registered offices must not be wrongly used, for example to restrict workers' rights, in particular as regards employee participation in company decisions, or to reduce the protection of creditors; considers, in particular, that safeguarding employees' acquired rights as regards participation in company decisions must be a declared aim of the directive;
priporoča, da bi morala Komisija nadalje preučiti, ali obstaja potreba po obravnavanju težav skupin in piramid, zlasti v zvezi z okvirom za preglednost struktur skupin in posebnih težav, povezanih s piramidnimi strukturami;
Recommends that the Commission should further examine whether there is a need to address the problems concerning groups and pyramids, especially with regard to the framework for the transparency of group structures and the special problems relating to pyramid structures;
poziva Komisijo, da posveti več pozornosti vprašanju izločitve iz trgovanja na borzi in da pripravi zakonodajni predlog za prihodnje usklajevanje na ravni EU; ugotavlja, da izločitev podjetja iz trgovanja na borzi, čeprav je mogoča v državah članicah, vključuje izjemne upravne in pravne stroške za vpletena podjetja; še enkrat poziva, da se v prihodnosti omogoči možnost preoblikovanja podjetja v zasebno podjetje z minimalnimi upravnimi napori, zlasti upoštevajoč varovanje finančnih interesov delničarjev;
Calls on the Commission to pay greater attention to the issue of delisting and to submit a legislative proposal for future harmonisation at EU level; notes that, while delisting is possible in the Member States, it involves enormous bureaucratic and legal cost for the businesses concerned; calls, therefore, for "going private" to be made possible in future with the minimum of bureaucratic effort, with particular consideration being given to safeguarding the financial interests of the shareholders;
poziva Komisijo, da učinkoviteje vključi Parlament v razprave o mednarodnih in evropskih računovodskih standardih ter da spodbudi opredelitev evropskega pristopa, ki bo temeljil na najboljših praksah in tradicijah v državah članicah, namesto slepega sledenja tradicijam revizije v ZDA; ponovno poudarja, da v mednarodnih organizacijah za postavljanje standardov potrebujemo več predstavnikov z evropskim ozadjem, da bi tako utemeljili pravi mednarodni pristop; poudarja, da pravila o računovodskih standardih vplivajo na davčno zakonodajo in poslovne strukture;
Calls on the Commission to involve Parliament more effectively in discussions concerning international and European accounting standards and to reinforce the definition of a European approach based on the best practices and traditions in the Member States, instead of blindly following the traditions of US auditing; stresses again the need for more representatives with a European background in the international standard-setting bodies, in order to legitimate a true international approach; emphasises that regulations on accounting standards have an impact on tax law and business structures;
obžaluje, da Svet za mednarodne računovodske standarde (IASB) ne premore demokratičnega nadzora in zato sprejema odločitve, ki ne odražajo ustrezno realnosti, v kateri so se znašla evropska podjetja – te odločitve se recimo ne uspejo odzvati na potrebe MSP; kot primer navaja zahtevo iz IAS 32, da je v bilanci stanja treba razlikovati med kapitalom in dolgovi, kar je v primeru partnerstev pripeljalo do znatnih materialnih problemov, npr. izkrivljenega prikaza njihove kreditne sposobnosti; zato poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi, da bodo sklepi Evropskega parlamenta v IASB dobili večjo težo;
Deplores the fact that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) lacks democratic control and thus comes to decisions that do not adequately reflect the reality of European companies and fail, for example, to respond to the needs of SMEs; cites by way of example the requirement, laid down in IAS 32, to distinguish in balance sheets between equity and liability, which, in the case of partnerships, has led to significant material problems, such as a distorted portrayal of their creditworthiness; calls on the Commission, therefore, to ensure that greater weight is attached to Parliament's decisions within the IASB;
želi pojasniti, da ni v pristojnosti Komisije podpirati mednarodne standarde računovodskega poročanja za MSP;
Wishes to make it clear that the Commission has no authority to endorse International Financial Reporting Standards for SMEs;
pričakuje rezultate zunanje študije o sorazmernosti med lastništvom in nadzorom v podjetjih, ki kotirajo na borzi v EU, ki jo je naročila Komisija, če bo v tej študiji opravljena ne samo nepristranska analiza empiričnih in teoretičnih dokazov o učinkih, ki jih imajo različni lastniški modeli v državah članicah na gospodarsko učinkovitost, lastniški nadzor podjetij in možnosti za čezmejne transakcije, pač pa tudi temeljita analiza prava družb, kar zadeva širši gospodarski in pravni položaj v državah članicah ter različne modele upravljanja podjetij; poudarja, da je treba ustrezno upoštevati potrebo po preglednosti strukture nadzornih pravic;
Looks forward to the results of the external study commissioned by the Commission on proportionality between ownership and control in EU listed companies, provided that it delivers not only an objective analysis of the empirical and theoretical evidence regarding the effects of the different ownership models in the Member States on economic efficiency, owner-control of companies and the possibilities for cross-border transactions, but also a sound analysis of corporate law as regards the wider economic and legal context in Member States and different models of corporate governance; stresses that due account should be taken of the need for transparency in the structure of control rights;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija po potrebi pripravila zakonodajni predlog o načelu "ena delnica – en glas" šele po končanem pregledu Direktive 2004/25/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. aprila 2004 o ponudbah za prevzem UL L 142, 30.4.2004, str.
Expects that the Commission will, if appropriate make a legislative proposal concerning the principle "one share one vote" only after the outcome of the revision of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids OJ L 142, 30.4.2004, p.
, kakor je predvideno v členu 20 te direktive, in oceni te direktive;
, as provided for in Article 20 of that directive, and an evaluation of that directive;
poziva Komisijo, da predlaga ukrepe za večjo preglednost na področju institucionalnih vlagateljev; opozarja, da je potrebna preglednost pri naložbeni politiki, glasovalni politiki in lastništvu delnic, ter da takšna preglednost ne sme biti omejena na odnos med skladi in posameznimi vlagatelji; opozarja, da bi morale za institucionalne vlagatelje veljati tudi določene obveznosti razkritja, ki jih imajo do podjetij, v katerih so dejavni, npr. glede njihovih namenov in predvidenega trajanja njihove dejavnosti;
Asks the Commission to propose measures for greater transparency regarding institutional investors; recalls that transparency is needed with regard to investment policy, voting policy and share ownership, and that such transparency must not be confined to the relationship between funds and single investors; recalls that there should also be certain disclosure obligations incumbent on institutional investors towards the companies in which they are engaged, e.g., with regard to their intentions and the proposed duration of their engagement;
poziva Komisijo, da obvesti Parlament o rezultatih posvetovanja o prihodnjih prednostnih nalogah za akcijski načrt 2003, ki ga je začela Komisija decembra 2005, ter da podrobno razloži odločitve, ki jih je sprejela kot posledico rezultata tega posvetovanja;
Calls on the Commission to inform Parliament about the results of the consultation on the future priorities for the 2003 Action Plan, launched by the Commission in December 2005, and to explain in detail the decisions taken by it as a result of the outcome of that consultation;
poziva Komisijo, da analizira težave, povezane z izvajanjem obstoječe zakonodaje, zato da se rezultati te analize upoštevajo pri razmišljanju o novih zakonodajnih predlogih;
Calls on the Commission to analyse the problems relating to the implementation of the existing legislation in order to take the results of that analysis into consideration when considering new legislative proposals;
poziva Odbor za pravne zadeve in Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve, da spremljata delo Komisije;
Calls on the Committee on Legal Affairs and the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs to follow the work of the Commission;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zmanjševanju vpliva letalstva na podnebne spremembe ( 2005/2249(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on reducing the climate change impact of aviation ( 2005/2249(INI) )
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Svetu, Evropskemu parlamentu, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij z naslovom "Zmanjševanje vpliva letalstva na podnebne spremembe" ( KOM(2005)0459 ),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Reducing the Climate Change Impact of Aviation ( COM(2005)0459 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varno hrano ter mnenja Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6-0201/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0201/2006 ),
ker je EU sprejela obveznost, da bo reševala težave v zvezi s podnebnimi spremembami, in je predlagala globalni cilj, da se segrevanje podnebja omeji na +2 °C v primerjavi z vrednostmi iz predindustrijskega obdobja,
whereas the EU is committed to the objective of tackling climate change and has put forward a global goal of limiting global temperature increase to +2°C compared to pre-industrialised levels,
ker je Evropski parlament v svoji zgoraj omenjeni resoluciji z dne 16. novembra 2005 navedel, da morajo razvite države močno zmanjšati emisije, in sicer za 30 % do leta 2020 in od 60 % do 80 % do leta 2050,
whereas in its abovementioned resolution of 16 November 2005 the European Parliament stated that strong emission reductions - 30% by 2020 and 60-80% by 2050 - are to be undertaken by developed countries,
ker je prispevek letalstva k podnebnim spremembam velik in naglo narašča,
whereas the contribution of aviation to climate change is substantial and growing rapidly,
ker za mednarodno letalstvo ne velja nobena obveznost iz Okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC) in njenega Kjotskega protokola niti nobena mednarodna obveznost glede podnebnih sprememb,
whereas international aviation is subject to no commitment arising from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol or from any other international commitment in the area of climate change,
ker bi morala EU prevzeti vodstvo v boju proti podnebnim spremembam ter z regionalnimi in vnaprejšnjimi ukrepi pokazati, kako se obvladuje vplive letalstva na podnebje,
whereas the EU should show leadership in the fight against climate change and, by taking regional and early action, lay down an example of how to tackle aviation's impact on the climate,
pozdravlja sporočilo Komisije in njeno priznanje, da je potreben celovit sveženj ukrepov, ki vključuje zakonodajne, gospodarske, tehnološke in operativne instrumente za obravnavanje vseh vplivov letalstva na podnebje ob uveljavitvi načela "onesnaževalec plača" ter zagotovitvi popolne internalizacijo stroškov;
Welcomes the Commission Communication and its recognition that a comprehensive package of measures including regulatory, economic, technological and operational instruments is needed to address all impacts of aviation on the climate, applying the "polluter pays" principle and ensuring full cost internalisation;
poudarja, da mora stroškovno učinkovito zmanjšanje vpliva letalstva na podnebne spremembe biti splošni cilj izbranih instrumentov politike; meni, da je treba te instrumente politike izbrati tako, da se čim bolj zmanjšajo emisije toplogrednih plinov, pri čemer je izkrivljanje konkurence med letalskimi prevozniki iz Evrope in tistimi zunaj nje minimalno, zmanjšati pa se mora tudi nelojalna konkurenca med sektorjem zračnega prevoza in drugimi prevoznimi sektorji v EU;
Stresses that the overall objective of the policy instruments chosen must be to reduce, in a cost-effective way, the climate change impact of aviation; these policy instruments must be chosen in such a way as to ensure that the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is as high as possible while the distortion of competition between Europe based air carriers and carriers from outside the EU is minimised and the unfair competition between the air transport sector and other transport sectors within the EU is reduced;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba v zvezi s tem izključiti vsako nepotrebno birokratsko breme, še posebej zaradi malih letalskih prevoznikov na trgu;
Stresses that in this respect every kind of unnecessary bureaucratic burden should be excluded, especially in light of the small air carriers that exist on the market;
v celoti podpira namero Komisije, da si bo prizadevala za uvedbo davka na kerozin in jo poziva, naj s tem nemudoma začne, tako da uvede davek na vse domače lete in lete znotraj EU (z možnostjo izvzetja vseh prevoznikov na relacijah, kjer opravljajo storitve prevozniki iz tretjih držav); poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga ureditev za uvedbo tega davka po vsem svetu;
Fully endorses the Commission's intention to pursue the introduction of kerosene taxes, and urges it to begin immediately by requiring a tax on all domestic and intra-EU flights (with the possibility to exempt all carriers on routes on which non-EU carriers operate); calls on the Commission to propose arrangements for their worldwide introduction;
poudarja nujnost doseganja rezultatov v sedanjem krogu ponovnih pogajanjih o sporazumih o zračnem prevozu, zlasti sporazumu z ZDA, ki bodo omogočili brezpogojno in nediskriminacijsko obdavčenje goriva tako za prevoznike iz EU kot za prevoznike iz tretjih držav;
Stresses the urgency of achieving results in the ongoing re-negotiations of air service agreements – in particular the agreement with the US - to unconditionally allow for the taxing of fuel supplied to EU and non-EU carriers on an equal basis;
poudarja, da oprostitev davka na zračni prevoz in druga neravnovesja vodijo k zelo nelojalni konkurenci med sektorjem letalskega prevoza in drugimi prevoznimi sektorji;
Underlines that the tax exemptions on air transport and other imbalances lead to very unfair competition between aviation and other transport sectors;
poudarja, da je to breme zlasti za železniški sektor, saj zanj ne veljajo le davki, ampak tudi evropski sistem za trgovanje z emisijami, kar znatno povečuje stroške tega okolju prijaznega prevoznega sistema;
Stresses that this is particularly a burden for the railway sector, because the railway sector is not only covered by taxes but also by the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), which significantly raises the cost for this environmentally friendly transport system;
poudarja, da izkrivljanje konkurence med prevoznimi sektorji povzroča tudi izkrivljanje konkurence med turističnimi regijami, kar škoduje zlasti regijam, ki so dostopne predvsem z avtom, avtobusom ali vlakom;
Underlines that this distortion of competition between transport sectors also leads to distortion of competition between tourist regions, to the disadvantage of those regions which are reached mainly by car, bus or railway;