natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so se predstavniki obeh konstitutivnih enot dogovorili, da bi predlagana reforma policijskih sil pomenila prenos vseh proračunskih pristojnosti na raven države, odpravo vsakršnega političnega poseganja v delovanje teh sil in razmejitev teritorialnih enot po izključno funkcionalnih merilih;
whereas the representatives of the two entities had agreed that the proposed police force reform would envisage the transfer to state level of all budgetary competencies, the elimination of all political interference in the operation of such forces and the delimitation of territorial units along purely functional lines,
ker je sporazum predvidel vzpostavitev direktorata za izvajanje prestrukturiranja policijskih sil s predstavniki vseh ravni odločanja (države, enot in kantonov), katerih naloga bi bila predstaviti predlog za izvajanje reforme, vključno z razmejitvijo novih teritorialnih enot;
whereas the agreement foresaw the setting up of a directorate for the implementation of police force restructuring, with representatives from all levels of authority (state, entity and cantons), whose task would be to submit a proposal for the implementation of the reform, including the demarcation of the new territorial units,
ker bi moral direktorat predloge predstaviti do 30. septembra 2006, kar se ni zgodilo, ker predstavniki Republike Srpske niso hoteli še naprej sodelovati pri tem vprašanju;
whereas the directorate should have submitted its proposals by 30 September 2006, a deadline which it failed to respect, given that the representatives of the Republika Srpska refused to cooperate further on this issue,
ker je med kampanjo vodstvo Republike Srpske večkrat podalo izjave, ki so izražale dvom v predlagano reformo policije in v sporazum, dosežen oktobra lani;
whereas during the campaign the Republika Srpska leadership repeatedly issued statements which questioned the proposed police reform and the agreement reached by the parties in October last year,
ker sta parlamentu Bosne in Hercegovine manjkala samo dva glasova, da bi dosegel potrebno kvalificirano večino za sprejetje predlogov ustavnih sprememb, o katerih so se sporazumele glavne politične stranke;
whereas the Parliament of Bosnia and Herzegovina failed by only two votes to reach the qualified majority required for the adoption of the constitutional amendments agreed by the main political parties,
ker je bil glavni nasprotnik "ne"-ja izvoljen za predsednika BiH;
whereas the main opponent of the 'no' vote was elected President of Bosnia and Herzegovina,
ker so med volilno kampanjo predstavniki Republike Srpske pozvali k referendumu o neodvisnosti, če bi pogajanja o prihodnosti Kosova privedla do pravne in teritorialne odcepitve od Srbije;
whereas during the election campaign representatives of the Republika Srpska called for an independence referendum, should the negotiations on the future status of Kosovo result in a legal and territorial separation from Serbia,
ker bi lahko odločitev o zaprtju urada visokega predstavnika vplivala na potek upravnih in ustavnih reform, ki so nujen predpogoj za postopno integracijo te države v Evropo;
whereas the decision to close down the Office of the High Representative could have an impact on the pace of the administrative and constitutional reforms, which are an essential prerequisite for the country's European integration process,
ker je volilna kampanja potrdila še vedno močno etnično delitev znotraj Bosne in Hercegovine ter potrebo po bolj celovitem, nesegregacijskem, sodobnem izobraževalnem sistemu v državi;
whereas the election campaign confirmed the persistence of strong ethnic divisions within Bosnia and Herzegovina and the need for a more integrated, non-segregationist, modern education system in the country,
naslavlja na Svet naslednja priporočila:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu za splošne zadeve, Komisiji, posebnemu predstavniku/visokemu predstavniku EU za Bosno in Hercegovino ter vladama Bosne in Hercegovine, to je Republike Srpske in Federacije Bosne in Hercegovine.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the General Affairs Council and, for information, to the Commission, the EU Special Representative/High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina and the governments of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republika Srpska and the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
o onesnaževanju v Afriki z izpušnimi plini iz motornih vozil
on pollution from motor-vehicle emissions in Africa
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o onesnaževanju v Afriki z izpušnimi plini iz motornih vozil
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on pollution from motor-vehicle emissions in Africa
ker v največjih afriških mestih in na velikih tranzitnih cestah po vsej celini nenehno raste stopnja onesnaženosti, ki jo povzroča vsakodnevni promet vozil z zastarelimi in visoko onesnažujočimi motorji,
whereas pollution levels are rising in Africa's large urban areas and on the continent's main road links, owing to the use of obsolete - and thus highly polluting - motor vehicles,
ker je cestni prevoz v Afriki velik vir emisij dušikovega oksida, ogljikovega monoksida in organskih nemetanskih spojin,
whereas in Africa road transport is a major source of nitrogen oxide, carbon monoxide and non-methane organic compound emissions,
ker sta za Evropsko unijo varstvo okolja in spodbujanje v to usmerjene politike zelo pomembna na svetovni ravni, zlasti pa državah tretjega in četrtega sveta,
whereas the European Union attaches great importance to environmental protection and to promoting environmental policy at international level, particularly in third and fourth world countries,
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi zakonodajni predlog z namenom, da se uzakoni prepoved izvoza vozil iz Evropske unije, ki ne spadajo v kategorijo "evro 4" oziroma ki niso novejše izdelave in opremljene z najnaprednejšimi napravami za zniževanje onesnažujočih emisij v Afriko in v druge države v razvoju.
Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal seeking to ban exports from the European Union to developing countries in Africa and elsewhere of vehicles which do not meet the Euro 4 standard (covering up-to-date vehicles fitted with the most advanced pollutant-emission control systems);
o potrebi po ponovni zasaditvi božičnih dreves po novoletnem obdobju
on the need to replant Christmas trees after Christmas
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o potrebi po ponovni zasaditvi božičnih dreves po novoletnem obdobju
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the need to replant Christmas trees after Christmas
ker se vsako leto zaradi božičnega okraševanja poseka in nato odvrže v smeti na milijone dreves,
whereas every year millions of trees are cut down, covered with Christmas decorations and then thrown away,
ker je večina dreves, ki so na prodaj v času božičnih praznikov, posekanih in brez korenin ter jih zato ni mogoče ponovno uporabiti ali zasaditi,
whereas most of the trees on sale during the Christmas period have had their roots cut off and therefore cannot be reused or replanted,
ker se vsako leto zaradi božičnih praznikov s sekanjem milijonov jelk in borov povzroči ogromna škoda okolju,
whereas the felling of millions of pine and fir trees for Christmas every year causes an enormous amount of damage to the environment,
poziva Komisijo, naj predstavi zakonodajni predlog, da bi se v Evropski uniji prepovedala prodaja božičnih dreves brez korenin in visokih nad 90 cm;
Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal seeking to ban the sale in the European Union of rootless Christmas trees over 90 centimetres high;
zahteva, da ta zakonodajni predlog predvidi dejansko sodelovanje lokalnih uprav, ki bi bile zadolžene za ponovno zasaditev božičnih dreves po prazničnem obdobju, ter da se spodbudi prodaja božičnih dreves iz razgradljivih snovi.
Calls for the proposal to provide for the active involvement of local authorities in making arrangements to replant trees after the Christmas period and for incentives to sell Christmas trees manufactured from biodegradable materials.
ki ga vlaga Martine Roure
by Martine Roure
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu o varstvu osebnih podatkov v okviru policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on data protection in the context of police cooperation in criminal matters
ob upoštevanju svojega poročila, sprejetega 27. septembra 2006 P6_TA(2006)0370 . ,
having regard to its report adopted on 27 September 2006 P6_TA(2006)0370 . ,
ob upoštevanju mnenja delovne skupine nacionalnih organov za varstvo osebnih podatkov (direktiva 95/46/ES, člen 29) in mnenja evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov UL C 47, 25.2.2006, str.
having regard to the opinions of the national authorities’ Data Protection Working Party (Directive 95/46/EC, Article 29) and the European Data Protection Supervisor OJ C 47, 25.2.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju konvencije št. 108 Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov,
having regard to Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data,
ob upoštevanju konvencije o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma z dne 14. junija 1985 med vladami držav Gospodarske unije Beneluks, Zvezne republike Nemčije in Francoske republike o postopni odpravi kontrol na skupnih mejah UL C 239, 22.9.2000, str.
having regard to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, p.
ker se je Svet držal obveze, sprejete 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, in pospešil potek razprav o predlogu okvirnega sklepa o varstvu podatkov pri policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah ter je tik pred dosego soglasja o tem besedilu,
whereas the Council has fulfilled an undertaking made before Parliament on 27 September 2006 by stepping up the pace of discussions on the proposal for a framework decision on data protection in the context of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters, and whereas it is apparently close to reaching an agreement on that text,
ker kaže, da kljub obvezi predsedstva, sprejeti 27. septembra 2006 v Evropskem parlamentu, Svet v okviru svojih pogajanj ni upošteval mnenja Evropskega parlamenta, čeprav je bilo to soglasno sprejeto,
whereas, despite the undertaking given by the Presidency in Parliament on 27 September 2006, it does not appear that Parliament’s opinion – unanimously adopted – has been taken into account in the negotiations taking place in the Council,
ker Evropski parlament in nacionalni parlamenti niso bili redno obveščeni o stanju pogajanj v Svetu,
whereas the European Parliament and the national parliaments have not been kept informed of the progress of negotiations in the Council,
ker so nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov podali zadržana mnenja in ker v izjavi, ki so jo podpisali 2. novembra 2006 v Londonu, zahtevajo vzpostavitev skladnega okvira za varstvo podatkov, ki se izmenjujejo bodisi na nacionalni ravni bodisi med državami članicami ali s tretjimi državami,
having regard to the reserved opinions expressed by the national data protection authorities and to their declaration issued in London on 2 November 2006, in which they called for the establishment of a coherent framework for protecting data exchanged at national level, between Member States or with non-EU countries,
ker je izjemno zaskrbljen nad potekom razprave v Svetu,
having regard to its extreme concern at the direction of the debate in the Council,
daje Svetu naslednja priporočila:
Addresses the following recommendations to the Council:
a) obžaluje, da se države članice na področju varstva podatkov nagibajo k sporazumu, ki bo temeljil na najnižjem skupnem imenovalcu; izraža zaskrbljenost, da bo v državah članicah Evropske unije izvajanje sporazuma imelo nasprotne, negativne posledice na splošno načelo varstva podatkov, pri tem pa ne bo vzpostavil zadostnega varstva na evropski ravni;
(a) regrets that Member States are moving towards a data protection agreement based on the lowest common denominator; fears, moreover, that the implementation of that agreement will have a negative impact on the general principle of data protection in EU Member States without establishing a satisfactory level of protection at European level;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission and the Parliaments and Governments of the Member States.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0428/2006
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0428/2006
o doseženem napredku EU pri oblikovanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) (člen 2 in člen 39 Pogodbe EU)
on the progress made in the EU towards the Area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o doseženem napredku EU pri oblikovanju območja svobode, varnosti in pravice (OSVP) (člen 2 in člen 39 Pogodbe EU)
European Parliament resolution on the progress made in the EU towards the Area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ) (Articles 2 and 39 of the EU Treaty)
ob upoštevanju člena 2 Pogodbe EU, ki nalaga EU za cilj, da se razvije kot območje svobode, varnosti in pravice,
having regard to Article 2 of the EU Treaty which sets the Union the objective of maintaining and developing itself as an area of freedom, security and justice,
ob upoštevanju člena 39 iste pogodbe, ki nalaga Evropskemu parlamentu, da vsako leto pripravi razpravo o doseženih napredkih na tem področju,
having regard to Article 39 of the EU Treaty which instructs Parliament to hold a debate on the progress made in this area,
ob upoštevanju odgovorov Sveta, ki so bili podani 27. septembra 2006 med razpravo o vprašanju za ustni odgovor ( B6-0428/2006 ), kot tudi ob upoštevanju predstavitev sporočil Komisije o izvajanju haaškega programa in prihodnjih obetov na tem področju,
having regard to the answers given by the Council at the debate of 27 September 2006 to Oral Question B6-0428/2006 , and to the Commission’s presentation of its communications reporting on the implementation of the Hague programme and future prospects,
ob upoštevanju razprav na parlamentarnem srečanju 2. in 3. oktobra 2006, ki je bilo organizirano skupaj s finskim parlamentom,
having regard to the debates held at the parliamentary meeting of 2 and 3 October 2006, organised in conjunction with the Finnish Parliament,
ker so v vedno bolj globaliziranemu svetu, ki mu pretijo krize in stalne napetosti, gospodarske neenakosti in stalno naraščajoči tokovi priseljencev, ideološka in kulturna soočenja, ki zadevajo vedno večje število oseb, in teroristične grožnje z neznanimi razsežnostmi, zahteve evropskih državljanov, da bi v Uniji uživali več svobode, varnosti in pravice, vedno bolj glasne,
whereas in a world which is more and more globalised and subject to crises and persistent tensions, economic inequalities and constantly growing migratory flows, ideological and cultural confrontations which affect a growing number of individuals, and terrorist threats whose scope can only be guessed at, the demand of European citizens for the right to enjoy greater freedom, security and justice within the Union is constantly increasing,
ker sedem let po sklepih Evropskega sveta v Tempereju, Evropska unija še nima skladne politike na področju priseljevanja, ter ji primanjkuje zlasti politika, ki zadeva zakonito priseljevanje,
whereas seven years after Tampere conclusions, the European Union does not have a coherent immigration policy, and in particular lacks a legal-migration policy,
je seznanjen, da dejavnikov zunanjega pritiska
noting that these external pressure factors
- Evropski Svet ni mogel upoštevati leta 1999 pri sprejemanju prvega programa iz Tampereja in so bili nezadostni upoštevani pri definiranju haaškega programa novembra 2004,
- could not have been taken into account in 1999 by the European Council when it adopted the first Tampere Programme, and that these factors have not been adequately taken into account since the establishment of the Hague Programme in November 2004,
- že vsaka država članica ne more nadzorovati in da jih bo sama Unija težko nadzorovala, če si ne bo priskrbela primernih sredstev za svoje ambicije in se ne bo uveljavila kot zaupanja vreden sogovornik na področju politik, povezanih z OSVP z drugimi mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot so Združeni narodi ( Zlasti Varnostni svet in njegovi odbori, ki so pristojni za boj proti terorizmu, Svet za temeljne pravice in specializirane agencije, ki lahko na različen način vplivajo na ukrepe EU na področju OSVP. ) ali kot je na regionalni ravni Afriška unija (za migracijske politike in razvoj) ali na evropski celini, brez bolj strukturiranega sodelovanja s Svetom Evrope in njegovimi organi, ki so pristojni za spodbujanje pravne države in zaščite temeljnih pravic ( Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice, Generalni sekretar Sveta Evrope, Komisar za človekove pravice. ),
- are already something that Member States cannot control, and which will become very difficult for the Union itself to control, unless the latter rapidly equips itself with the wherewithal to realise its ambitions, and becomes a credible spokesman for the policies linked to the AFSJ vis-à-vis other international organisations such as the United Nations Particularly the Security Council and its committees in charge of the fight against terrorism, the Council for Fundamental Rights and the specialist agencies which, in their different ways, may influence EU measures on FSJ. or, at regional level, the African Union with regard to migration and development policies or, on the European continent itself, without more structured cooperation with the Council of Europe and its bodies responsible for promoting the rule of law and the protection of fundamental rights European Court of Human Rights, Secretary-General of the COE, Commissioner for Human Rights. ,
opozarja, da v primeru pomanjkanja skladnega pravnega reda in stališč, s katerimi se strinjajo države članice, EU na področju OVSP ne bo mogla resno vplivati na stališča tretjih držav, vključno svojih zaveznikov, kot so Združene države, in da to lahko ogrozi njen ugled in jo prisili k temu, da se podredi političnim in strateškim pobudam teh držav,
whereas, given the absence of a consistent acquis and shared positions amongst its Member States, the EU is not in a position to exercise any serious influence, in the fields of AFSJ, on the position of third countries, including its allies such as the USA, and that this could affect its credibility, in addition to forcing it to yield political and strategic initiative to those countries,
ker ta strateška šibkost na ravni EU ne izhaja samo iz dejstva, da so se te politike prenesle na reven EU šele pred kratkim ( Čeprav prvi poskusi oblikovanja evropskega pravosodnega območja segajo že v leta '75 zaradi prvega vala terorističnih napadov v Evropi. ), ampak predvsem zaradi tega, ker je prenos potekal ob priložnosti Maastrichtske in Amsterdamske pogodbe, pri tem pa je bil velik del držav članic zadržan in ker je prehod na običajen zakonodajni režim, predviden že leta 1993, potekal postopoma leta 1999, 2001, 2004 in nazadnje leta 2005 s haaškim programom, z (delnim) aktiviranjem "premostitvene klavzule", predvidene v členu 67 Pogodbe ES,
whereas this strategic weakness at EU level is not only due to the fact that these politics have only recently been moved to EU level Even if the first attempts to create the European judicial area go back as far as 1975, when the continent first suffered a wave of terrorist attacks. but, above all, to the fact that this move was made in the Maastricht and Amsterdam Treaties, with many reservations on the part of the Member States, and whereas the move to the ordinary legislative regime provided for as early as 1993 has taken place only by limited progress in 1999, 2001, 2004 and finally 2005 with the (partial) activation, thanks to the Hague Plan, of the ‘passerelle’ provided for by Article 67 of the TEC,
opozarja, da se tudi danes število pravnih podlag veča zaradi istega političnega cilja, neprestano novih konfliktov in zatekanja k sodnim postopkom, da bi se razmejilo obseg pristojnosti institucij, pravila soglasja in predvsem zaradi pomanjkanja resničnega demokratskega in sodnega nadzora, kar povzroča, da so trenutne razmere na področju politik tretjega stebra zaradi dejstva, ali EU spoštuje načela na katerih oznanja, da temelji (člen 6 Pogodbe EU), zelo občutljive,
recalling that even today the proliferation of legal bases for a single political objective, the proliferation of jurisdictional conflicts and appeals to define the scope of the institutions’ powers, the unanimity rule and, above all, the absence of genuine democratic and jurisdictional control all make the current situation of the third pillar policies extremely fragile from the point of view of EU respect for the principles on which it claims to be founded (Article 6 TEU),
opozarja pred tveganjem, da se izven evropskih pogodb razvijajo teme, ki so že predmet predlogov evropskih institucij; želi začeti odprto razpravo, ki temelji na lojalnem sodelovanju med evropskimi institucijami in z nacionalnimi parlamenti glede vključitve Pogodbe iz Prüma v Pogodbo Skupnosti, da bi omogočili Parlamentu izvajanje demokratičnega nadzora,
warning against the risks of pursuing outside the European Treaties the development of topics which are already the subject of proposals put forward by the EU institutions; wishing to launch an open debate based on fair cooperation amongst the EU institutions and with the Member States’ parliaments concerning the incorporation of the Prüm Treaty into the Community Treaty, in order to enable Parliament to exercise democratic control,
je seznanjen z dejstvom, da so države članice prve, ki bi se morale zavedati tega pomanjkljivega položaja glede stališča demokracije, prava in delovanja ter dejstva, da so se s podpisom ustavne pogodbe zavezali k temu, da bo od novembra 2006 postalo obvezno to, kar je bilo z Maastrichtsko pogodbo samo Svetu priznana zmožnost,
noting that the Member States are more aware than anyone of the deficiencies of this situation from a democratic, jurisdictional and indeed operational point of view and that, by signing the Constitutional Treaty, they have committed themselves to making obligatory from November 2006 what was in the Maastricht Treaty merely an acknowledged option open to the Council,
je prepričan, da je aktiviranje "premostitvenih klavzul", predvidenih v členu 67 Pogodbe ES in členu 42 Pogodbe EU, ne samo v skladu s trenutnimi ustavnimi razmerami, ampak v skladu s prihodnjimi ustavnimi razmerami in da bi jih moral posledično aktivirati Svet tudi v skladu s členom 18 Dunajske konvencije, ki strani zavezuje k lojalnemu sodelovanju, da bi se tako oblikovali bolj ugodni pogoji za bodočo ratifikacijo,
convinced that activating the ‘passerelles’ provided for by Articles 67 TEC and 42 TEU is not only appropriate to the current constitutional situation but also compatible with the constitutional situation of the future, and that in consequence, the Council should also be activating it under the aegis of Article 18 of the Vienna Convention, which commits its signatories to cooperating sincerely to create the most favourable conditions with a view to future ratification,