natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da je proizvodna učinkovitost bistvena za trajnostnejše upravljanje omejenih virov in da morajo biti kmetje inovativni pri svojih pridelovalnih tehnikah ter uporabljati najučinkovitejša finančna, znanstvena in tehnična orodja upravljanja, da bodo lahko zadovoljili večje povpraševanje po hrani in obnovljivih kmetijskih materialih na gospodarsko, družbeno in okoljsko trajnostnejši način;
Considers that production efficiency is fundamental to more sustainable management of scarce resources and that farmers should innovate in their technical production methods by using the most efficient financial, scientific and technical management tools to help meet the growing demand for food and for renewable agricultural materials in a more economically, socially and environmentally sustainable manner;
v okviru strategije EU 2020 poudarja, da so raziskave in razvoj, uporaba novih tehnologij in dobrih praks v kmetijstvu pomembni za izboljšanje konkurenčnosti in povečanje proizvodnje ob hkratnem zmanjšanju uporabe pesticidov, gnojil in omejenih virov, kot sta voda in energija; meni, da je za spopadanje z novimi izzivi treba še naprej spodbujati naložbe v inovacije v kmetijstvu, med drugim prek programov za raziskave in razvoj v okviru SKP in EU;
Emphasises in the context of the EU 2020 Strategy that research and development, the use of new technologies and good agricultural practices are important in order to improve competitiveness and increase production while reducing the use of pesticides, fertilisers and scarce resources such as water and energy; takes the view that investment in agricultural innovation should be further encouraged, inter alia through the CAP and EU research and development framework programmes, in order to address new challenges;
v ta namen priporoča aktivno navzočnost kmetijskih svetovalcev v regijah, ki bi vodili kmete pri njihovih poskusih zagotavljanja okoljskih javnih dobrin;
Recommends to this end the active presence of agronomic advisors in the regions to guide farmers in their attempts to deliver environmental public goods;
meni, da je treba uvesti zaščitne ukrepe, da se zagotovi nadaljnja uporaba biotehnologije v kmetijstvu brez vpliva na obstoječe načine pridelave;
Believes that safeguards need to be introduced to ensure that biotechnology can continue to be used in agriculture without impacting on existing production methods.
ugotavlja, da trg doslej še ni nagrajeval kmetov za varstvo okolja in drugih javnih dobrin; zato meni, da se mora SKP bolj posvetiti trajnosti z omogočanjem pravih ekonomskih spodbud za kmete, da bi optimizirali zagotavljanje storitev ekosistemov za nadaljnje izboljšanje upravljanja okoljskih virov na kmetijskih zemljiščih v EU; poudarja, da je to treba doseči brez dodatne finančne ali birokratske obremenitve kmetov;
Notes that the market has failed, to date, to properly reward farmers for protecting the environment and other public goods; therefore believes that the CAP must place a greater emphasis on sustainability by providing proper economic incentives for farmers to optimise the delivery of eco-system services and further improve the sound environmental resource management of EU farmland; emphasises that this should be achieved without creating an extra financial or bureaucratic burden for farmers;
meni, da zaradi izboljšanja proizvodnih dejavnikov, do katerega je prišlo zaradi večjega znanja, kmetje lahko odločilno prispevajo k zeleni rasti in se odzivajo na energetsko krizo z razvojem zelene energije v oblikah, kot so biomasa, biološki odpadki, bioplin, biogoriva druge generacije ter izraba energije vetra, sonca in vode omejenega obsega, ki bodo pomagale ustvariti tudi nove zelene zaposlitvene priložnosti;
Believes that, thanks to improvements in production factors linked to advances in knowledge, farmers are well placed to contribute to green growth and respond to the energy crisis through the development of green energy in such forms as biomass, biowaste, biogas, second-generation biofuels and small-scale wind, solar and hydro energy, which will also help create new green job opportunities;
Skupna in enostavna politika
A common and simple policy
vztraja, da je bolj kot kdaj koli prej pomembno, da skupna kmetijska politika zagotovi čezmejno razsežnost preskrbe s hrano, podnebnih sprememb, visokih enotnih standardov varstva okolja, varnosti in kakovosti proizvodov ter dobrega počutja živali na ustrezno delujočem enotnem trgu;
Insists that a common agricultural policy is more relevant than ever before to ensure that the cross-border dimension of food supply, climate change, high common standards of environmental protection, product safety and quality and animal welfare is guaranteed in a properly functioning Single Market;
meni, da mora biti nova SKP prek poenostavljenega sistema pomoči enostavna za upravljanje, pregledna, ter da mora zmanjšati birokracijo in upravna bremena za kmete, zlasti za manjše proizvajalce, ter omogočati kmetom, da se osredotočijo na svojo glavno nalogo, namreč zagotavljanje kakovostnih kmetijskih proizvodov; meni, da je to mogoče doseči med drugim s prehodom na uporabo izvedbenih orodij, kot so dogovori o učinkih, enostavne pogodbe in večletna plačila, ki določajo cilje in kmete pooblaščajo, da izberejo primeren sistem kmetovanja za njihovo uresničitev;
Believes that the new CAP, through a simplified support system, must be easy to administer, transparent, and reduce red tape and administrative burdens on farmers, particularly for smaller producers, in order to allow farmers to concentrate on their main task of providing high-quality agricultural products; believes that this could be achieved inter alia by moving towards the use of delivery tools that set the goals and empower farmers to choose their own farming systems to meet these objectives, such as outcome agreements, simple contracts and multiannual payments;
poziva k sprejetju ustreznih ukrepov, s katerimi bo mogoče ne samo kmetom ampak tudi vsem evropskim državljanom pojasniti, iz česa je sestavljena SKP, ter hkrati jasno predstaviti cilje, razpoložljiva sredstva in pričakovane pozitivne učinke izvajanja SKP;
Calls for appropriate measures to be taken to explain what the CAP consists of, not only to farmers but to all Europe's citizens, while providing transparently clear information about the objectives being pursued, the means available and the anticipated beneficial effects of implementing the CAP;
meni, da mora biti pristop Komisije k izvajanju regulativnega nadzora, opravljanju revizij skladnosti in uvedbi finančnih popravkov bolj sorazmeren in mora temeljiti na tveganju;
Considers that there needs to be a more proportionate and risk-based approach by the Commission to the application of regulatory controls, the conduct of compliance audits and the imposition of financial corrections;
zahteva, naj se Evropskemu parlamentu pravočasno posredujejo posodobljeni podatki o tekočem stanju proračuna za kmetijstvo;
Calls for the European Parliament to be provided with prompt, up-to-date information on the current state of the agriculture budget;
Zagotavljanje pravične, zelene in trajnostne SKP
Delivering a fair, green and sustainable CAP
pričakuje, da bo SKP v skladu s sklepi spomladanskega Evropskega sveta o Evropi 2020 preoblikovana tako, da bo ponujala instrumente za pametno, vključujočo in zeleno rast;
Expects the re-design of the CAP in line with the spring European Council conclusion on Europe 2020, with a view to providing instruments that deliver smart, inclusive, green growth;
priznava širok razpon obstoječih in novih prednostnih nalog za SKP in ugotavlja, da so nove države članice, ko so se priključile Evropski uniji, upravičeno pričakovale, da bo pomoč v okviru SKP sčasoma primerljiva s starimi državami članicami; poziva, naj se za popoln odziv na nove izzive in uresničitev prednostnih nalog reformirane SKP zneski, dodeljeni SKP v proračunu za leto 2013, vsaj ohranijo na isti ravni tudi v naslednjem finančnem programskem obdobju;
Recognises the wide range of existing and new priorities for the CAP and notes that the new Member States' justified expectation when they joined the European Union was that CAP support would, over time, be comparable with old Member States; in order to fully respond to the new challenges and deliver the priorities of a reformed CAP, calls for the amounts allocated to the CAP in the 2013 budget to be at least maintained during the next financial programming period;
poziva k oblikovanju mehanizma prilagodljivosti proračuna SKP, da se lahko neporabljena sredstva ob koncu leta prenesejo in prerazporedijo v naslednje leto;
Calls for the CAP budget to have an end-of-year flexibility mechanism in order to carry over and reallocate under-spends in the following year;
vztraja, da se SKP ne sme ponovno prenesti v nacionalni okvir, zato meni, da se mora neposredna pomoč še naprej v celoti financirati iz proračuna EU in zavrača kakršno koli dodatno sofinanciranje, ki bi lahko škodilo pošteni konkurenci na enotnem trgu EU;
Insists that the CAP should not be renationalised and therefore believes that direct support should remain fully financed by the EU budget, hence rejecting any further co-financing which could harm fair competition within the EU Single Market;
poziva k pošteni porazdelitvi sredstev SKP med kmete v EU; ponovno poudarja, da je treba ob upoštevanju raznolikosti kmetijske dejavnosti v EU oblikovati objektivna merila, da se opredeli pošten sistem razdeljevanja; poudarja, da neposredna plačila prispevajo k zagotavljanju javnih dobrin, stabilizaciji dohodkov kmetov in zavarovanju pred tveganji, deloma izravnavajo družbeno zaželene visoke standarde v EU, nenehno zmanjšujejo tarifne ovire ter predstavljajo plačilo za zagotavljanje osnovnih javnih dobrin, česar trg sam ne nagrajuje;
Calls for a fair distribution of CAP funds to farmers across the EU; recalls that to respect the diversity of farming in the EU, objective criteria must be found in order to define a fair system of distribution; points out that direct payments contribute to the provision of public goods, help stabilise farmers' incomes and ensure against risks, partially offsetting the socially desirable high standards in the EU and the continuing reduction in tariff barriers, as well as rewarding basic public goods provision, which receives no market compensation;
meni, da za zmanjšanje razlik v porazdelitvi neposrednih sredstev podpore med državami članicami in odsevanje izjemne raznolikosti, ki je značilna za evropsko kmetijstvo, ne bo zadostovala hektarska osnova, zato poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga dodatna objektivna merila in oceni njihov potencialni vpliv ob upoštevanju zapletenosti kmetijskega sektorja in razlik med državami članicami, da bi se dosegla bolj uravnotežena porazdelitev;
Believes that in order to reduce the disparities in the distribution of direct support funds between Member States and to reflect the wide diversity characterising European agriculture, the hectare basis alone will not be sufficient, and therefore calls on the Commission to propose additional objective criteria and to evaluate their potential impact, taking into account the complexity of the agricultural sector and the differences between Member States, in order to achieve a more balanced distribution;
poziva, naj se jasno opredelijo poštena in objektivna merila za razporeditev sredstev z namenom razvoja podeželja,
Calls for fair and objective criteria to be clearly defined for the allocation of funds for rural development objectives;
meni, da se mora v naslednjem obdobju finančnega načrtovanja neposredna podpora v vseh državah članicah začeti izplačevati na osnovi površine; to bi bilo zadostno prehodno obdobje, ki bi kmetom in kmetijskim strukturam, ki še vedno uporabljajo sistem preteklih plačil, zagotovilo prožnost, da se prilagodijo spremembam in se izognejo preveč radikalni prerazporeditvi podpore, ne glede na hitro doseganje uravnotežene porazdelitve podpore med državami članicami; ugotavlja, da lahko prehod s preteklih plačil kot osnove pomeni posebne izzive za države članice ali regije s sorazmerno velikim obsegom golega zemljišča (upravičeno zemljišče, za katerega lastnik ni zahteval plačil); poziva k celovitemu upoštevanju posebnih potreb takih območij pri oblikovanju prihodnje podpore; meni tudi, da morajo države članice in regije ohraniti prožnost glede regionalizacije sistema plačil na osnovi površine, tako da bo odražal njihove posebne prednostne naloge, hkrati pa upošteval pošteno konkurenco in notranji trg;
Believes that direct support should move to an area basis in all Member States within the next financial programming period; this would constitute a sufficient transition period allowing farmers and agricultural structures that are still using the historical payments system the flexibility to adapt to the changes, and to avoid too radical a redistribution of support, without prejudice to promptly achieving a balanced distribution of support amongst Member States; notes that the move away from the historical basis may create particular challenges for Member States or regions with a relatively large amount of ‘naked land’ (unclaimed eligible land); calls for the specific needs of such regions to be given full consideration when designing future support; also believes that Member States and regions must continue to have the flexibility to regionalise their area payments system in such a way as to reflect their specific priorities while respecting fair competition in the internal market;
meni, da vrnitev na vezana plačila kot vodilno načelo SKP ni dopustna; vendar meni, glede na prehod s sistema preteklih plačil na model pomoči na osnovi površine v skladu s sklepi iz pregleda SKP, da mora biti državam članicam zagotovljena ustrezna stopnja prožnosti; meni, da bo ta prožnost državam članicam omogočila, da bi se lahko odzivale na posebne potrebe njihovega ozemlja in preprečile popolno zaustavitev pridelave ali zmanjšanje raznolikosti kmetijskih dejavnosti; meni, da bi ta manevrski prostor moral biti v obliki omejenih vezanih plačil za ranljive sektorje kmetijstva in ozemlja ter okoljsko občutljiva območja, v skladu z zahtevami WTO in ob hkratnem zagotavljanju poštenih tržnih razmer za kmete v vsej EU;
Considers that there should be no return to coupled payments as a guiding principle of the CAP; takes the view, however, given the move from a historical to an area support model in the wake of the decisions following the Health Check, that an adequate margin for flexibility should be left to Member States; believes that this flexibility will enable Member States to respond to the specific needs of their territory and to prevent production from stopping completely or the diversity of farming from being reduced; takes the view that this margin for manoeuvre would take the form of capped coupled payments for vulnerable agriculture sectors and territories and environmentally sensitive areas, in compliance with WTO requirements, whilst ensuring fair market conditions for farmers across the EU;
opredeljuje potrebo po osrednjih ključnih gradnikih – varnost preskrbe s hrano in poštena trgovina, trajnost, kmetijstvo v vsej Evropi, kakovost živil, biotska raznovrstnost in varstvo okolja ter zelena rast – da se zagotovi pravična in trajnostnejša SKP; meni, da je treba ohraniti strukturo dveh stebrov, vendar se je pri tem treba izogniti podvajanju ciljev in instrumentov politike in upoštevati vsebino tukaj opredeljenih gradnikov;
Identifies the need for central key building blocks – Food Security and Fair Trade, Sustainability, Agriculture across Europe, Food Quality, Biodiversity and Environmental Protection, and Green Growth – to achieve a fair and more sustainable CAP; considers that the two-pillar structure should be maintained, but that it should avoid duplication of policy objectives and instruments as well as reflecting the content of the building blocks identified here;
meni, da je treba zaradi poenostavitve, jasnosti in skupnega pristopa že na začetku reforme določiti financiranje vseh prednostnih nalog SKP;
Believes that, in the interest of simplification, clarity and a common approach, funding for each of the priorities of the CAP must be agreed from the start of the reform;
meni, da sta vzdržnost kmetij in kakovost življenja kmetov nujen pogoj za nadaljevanje kmetijske dejavnosti; zato meni, da je treba vsem kmetom v EU zagotoviti osnovna neposredna plačila na površino, ki jih financira EU, da se zagotovi socialna in ekonomska trajnost evropskega modela kmetijske proizvodnje, ki bi moral zagotavljati varnost osnovne preskrbe s hrano za evropske potrošnike, kmetom omogočiti konkurenčno proizvodnjo visokokakovostne hrane, zagotoviti spodbujanje kmetijske dejavnosti in zaposlovanja na podeželju v celotni EU ter osnovne javne dobrine na podlagi zahtev navzkrižne skladnosti za dobre kmetijske in okoljske pogoje ter v skladu s standardi visoke kakovosti in dobrega počutja živali;
Maintains that farm viability and quality of life for farmers are a sine qua non if farming activity is to continue; believes therefore that there should be a basic EU-funded direct area payment to all EU farmers in order to ensure the social and economic sustainability of the European agricultural production model, which should provide basic food security for European consumers, allow farmers to produce high-quality food competitively, ensure that farming activity and jobs in rural areas are encouraged across the EU and provide baseline public goods through cross-compliance requirements for Good Agricultural and Environmental Conditions, as well as high quality and animal welfare standards;
poziva k absolutni zahtevi, da se nagrajuje samo aktivno kmetijsko proizvodnjo tako, da se v pravila o navzkrižni skladnosti vključi minimalna dejavnost v zameno za plačilo in da postane sorazmernost ključno načelo pri izvrševanju pravil;
Calls for an absolute requirement that only active agricultural production be rewarded, whereby minimum activity requirements would be included in the cross-compliance rules as a precondition for payments, and for proportionality to be the key principle applied when enforcing the rules;
meni, da je treba kmetom zagotoviti dodatna plačila, ki bi jih financirala EU, z enostavnimi večletnimi pogodbami, ki jih bodo nagrajevale za zmanjševanje emisij ogljika na enoto proizvodnje in/ali povečevanje skladiščenja ogljika v tleh s pomočjo trajnostnih proizvodnih metod in s proizvodnjo biomase, ki jo je mogoče uporabiti pri proizvodnji trajnih kmetijskih materialov;
Believes that an EU-funded top-up payment should be made available to farmers through simple multiannual contracts rewarding them for reducing their carbon emissions per unit of production and/or increasing their sequestration of carbon in the soil through sustainable production methods and through the production of biomass that can be used in the production of long-lasting agro-materials;
meni, da bi to imelo dvojno korist, saj bi kmetijstvo EU postalo okoljsko in gospodarsko trajnostnejše na podlagi manjših emisij ogljika in/ali izboljšane učinkovitosti, kmetom pa bi zagotovilo finančno korist od povečanega skladiščenja ogljika na njihovem zemljišču in jih izenačilo z drugimi panogami, ki so vključene v sistem EU za trgovanje z emisijami; poziva, naj se ustrezno opredelijo jasna in merljiva merila ter cilji za čim hitrejšo izvedbo teh plačil v vseh državah članicah;
Notes that this would have the double benefit of making EU agriculture more environmentally and economically sustainable through lower carbon emissions and/or improved efficiency and would also ensure that farmers can financially benefit from increased carbon sequestration on their land and put them on the same footing as other industries which are in the EU ETS; calls for clear and measurable criteria and targets to be defined appropriately to allow these payments to be implemented as soon as possible in every Member State;
poziva k nadaljnjemu izvajanju posebnih ukrepov za zagotovitev nadomestila kmetom, ki proizvajajo na prikrajšanih območjih, kot so območja z naravnimi omejitvami, vključno npr. z gorskimi regijami, okoljsko občutljivimi območji in/ali regijami, ki so najbolj prizadete zaradi podnebnih sprememb ter najbolj oddaljenimi regijami, da se zagotovi takšna kmetijska dejavnost, ki bo omogočila nadaljnje upravljanje zemljišč in lokalno proizvodnjo hrane po vsej EU, kar bo zmanjšalo grožnjo opuščanja zemljišč, zagotovilo uravnoteženo upravljanje ozemelj v vsej EU ter racionalen razvoj kmetijske proizvodnje;
Calls for the continuation of specific measures to compensate farmers producing in disadvantaged areas such as areas with natural handicaps, including e.g. mountainous regions, environmentally sensitive areas and/or regions which are the most affected by climate change, and outermost regions, in order to ensure that agricultural activity takes place so that land continues to be managed and local food is produced across the EU, reducing the threat of land abandonment and ensuring balanced territorial management across the EU and a rational development of agricultural production;
meni, da je treba pri kakršni koli reformi sheme za območja z omejenimi možnostmi, zlasti pri določanju in razvrščanju teh območij, upoštevati težave, s katerimi se spopadajo kmetje v različnih delih EU, saj se te razlikujejo glede na različne biofizične in podnebne pogoje; meni, da je treba območjem, ki bi bila po novih pravilih izključena, zagotoviti ustrezno obdobje opuščanja;
Believes that any reform to the less-favoured areas (LFA) scheme, particularly regarding how LFAs are designated and classified, should take into consideration the difficulties experienced by farmers in all parts of the EU, as these vary greatly with different biophysical and climatic conditions; takes the view that areas which may be excluded under any new rules should be granted an adequate phasing-out period.
opozarja na posebno vlogo kmetov na obmestnih območjih, kjer je pritisk na podeželske in kmetijske vire lahko precejšnji; poudarja, da je treba ohraniti to proizvodnjo hrane in javnih dobrin blizu mestnega prebivalstva;
Draws attention to the particular role played by farmers in peri-urban areas, where there can be intensive pressures on rural and agricultural resources; stresses that this production of food and public goods near urban populations should be maintained;
poudarja, da mora razvoj politike kakovosti živil, zlasti kar zadeva geografsko označbo (ZOP/ZGO/ZTP), postati prednostna naloga SKP ter ga je treba spodbujati in krepiti tako, da se EU omogoči ohranjanje njene vodilne vloge na tem področju; meni, da je za te kakovostne proizvode treba omogočiti oblikovanje izvirnih instrumentov upravljanja, varovanja in spodbujanja, ki naj zagotovijo njihov skladen razvoj in pomemben prispevek k trajnostnemu razvoju in konkurenčnosti evropskega kmetijstva;
Stresses that the development of food quality policy, including in terms of geographical indication (PDO/PGI/TSG), must be a priority aspect of the CAP and be deepened and strengthened so that the EU can maintain its leadership position in this area; takes the view that, in the case of these high-quality products, the use of original management, protection and promotion instruments should be allowed, enabling them to develop in a harmonious fashion and to continue to make their major contribution to the sustainable growth and competitiveness of European agriculture;