natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
potrjuje svojo pripravljenost, da se s Svetom sporazume o novem medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, ki bi zagotovil količinske, strukturne in kakovostne elemente;
Confirms its will to achieve an agreement with the Council on a new Interinstitutional Agreement which guarantees quantitative, structural and qualitative elements;
opominja Svet, da je na pogajanja pripravljen že od 8. junija 2005;
Reminds the Council of its readiness to negotiate since 8 June 2005;
meni, da se veljavnosti sedanjega medinstitucionalnega sporazuma ne sme podaljšati v okviru določb člena 26;
Considers that the current Interinstitutional Agreement should not be extended under the provisions of Article 26;
opozarja, da Pogodba ES (člen 272) določa sprejem letnih proračunov;
Recalls that the EC Treaty (Article 272) provides for the adoption of annual budgets;
zato se odpoveduje veljavni finančni perspektivi in medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu z dne 6. maja 1999 o proračunski disciplini in izboljšanju proračunskega postopka;
Therefore decides to denounce the existing financial perspective and Interinstitutional Agreement of 6 May 1999 on budgetary discipline and improvement of the budgetary procedure;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in drugim zadevnim institucijam in organom, pa tudi nacionalnim vladam in parlamentom držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the other institutions and bodies concerned, as well as to the national governments and parliaments of the Member States.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑0002/2006
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0002/2006
v skladu s členom 108(5) poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 108(5) of the Rules of Procedure
o spremembi protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah
on modification of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o spremembi protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah
European Parliament resolution on modification of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities
ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 23. junija 2005 o spremembi sklepa z dne 4. junija 2003 o sprejetju statuta za poslance Evropskega parlamenta,
having regard to its resolution of 23 June 2005 on the amendment of its decision of 4 June 2003 on the adoption of the Statute for the Members of the European Parliament,
ob upoštevanju izjave predstavnikov držav članic v Svetu z dne 6. junija 2005, v kateri so soglašali, da "ko bo v skladu s členom 190(5) Pogodbe sprejet akt, ki bo določal pravila in splošne pogoje za opravljanje funkcije člana Evropskega parlamenta, bodo obravnavali zahtevo Parlamenta o ponovnem pregledu določil protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1965, kolikor zadevajo člane Evropskega parlamenta, z namenom, da se v najkrajšem možnem času sprejme ustrezen sklep",
having regard to the Declaration of 6 June 2005 by Representatives of the Member States, meeting within Council, in which they agreed that 'when an instrument laying down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of duties of Members of the European Parliament is adopted pursuant to the terms of Article 190(5) of the Treaty, they will examine the request of Parliament to revise the relevant provisions of the Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 1965 insofar as it concerns the Members of the European Parliament with a view to reach a conclusion as soon as possible',
ker je bilo v resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2005 izraženo mnenje, da je bila izjava z dne 3. junija bistveni element za sklenitev dogovora s Svetom o statutu poslancev,
whereas its resolution of 23 June 2005 considered the Declaration of 3 June to be an essential element for a compromise with the Council on the Statute,
ker je bilo v resoluciji z dne 23. junija 2005 poudarjeno, da "je splošni dogovor o statutu poslancev Evropskega parlamenta sestavljen iz naslednji elementov:
whereas its resolution of 23 June 2005 insisted 'that the overall compromise on the Statute for Members of the European Parliament should consist of:
a) jasna in neodvisna obravnava tistega dela statuta, ki spada v sekundarno zakonodajo, in tistega, ki je del primarne zakonodaje, in sprejetje obeh delov v skladu z izvedbenimi instuticionalnimi določili za vsak del;
(a) a separate and independent examination of that part of the Statute which falls under secondary law and of that part which falls under primary law, and approval of both parts in accordance with the institutional provisions applicable to each of them;
b) kar zadeva del, ki spada v primarno pravo, so države članice vabljene, da ponovno obravnavajo protokol o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti z dne 8. aprila 1965, ker gre za določila o poslancih Evropskega parlamenta, in da se zgledujejo po modelu statuta, sprejetega 3. in 4. junija 2003",
(b) with regard to that part which falls under primary law, the Member States are called upon to review the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 in respect of the provisions relating to Members of the European Parliament, taking the Statute approved on 3 and 4 June 2003 as a model',
opozarja na obvezo Sveta, da obravnava zahtevo Evropskega parlamenta po ponovnem pregledu določil protokola o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti iz leta 1965, ki se nanaša na poslance Evropskega parlamenta, z namenom, da v najkrajšem možnem času sprejme ustrezen sklep; poleg tega upa, da bo ob pregledu vključena klavzula, ki bo omogočala Evropskemu parlamentu, da se za varstvo privilegijev in imunitet, ki jih zagotavlja protokol, obrne na Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti;
Recalls the Council's undertaking to consider Parliament's request for a review of those provisions of the 1965 Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities relating to Members of the European Parliament, the aim being to reach a conclusion as swiftly as possible; hopes also that, when the revision is carried out, a clause will be inserted to enable the European Parliament to bring actions before the Court of Justice for the purpose of safeguarding the privileges and immunities guaranteed by the Protocol;
ponovno poudarja, da mora biti osnova za ponovni pregled statut, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel 3. in 4. junija 2003;
Confirms that the basis for that review must be the Statute approved by the European Parliament on 3 and 4 June 2003;
poziva Svet, naj zagotovi ustrezno sodelovanje Parlamenta pri tem ponovnem pregledu;
Calls on the Council to ensure the appropriate European Parliament involvement in that review;
o zasedanjih Evropskega parlamenta v Bruslju in sejah Evropskega sveta v Strasbourgu
on European Parliament sessions in Brussels and European Council meetings in Strasbourg
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o zasedanjih Evropskega parlamenta v Bruslju in sejah Evropskega sveta v Strasbourgu
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on European Parliament sessions in Brussels and European Council meetings in Strasbourg
ker Parlament dela tri tedne od štirih v Bruslju, kjer ima vse potrebne zmogljivosti in kjer se nahajata tudi Komisija in Svet, s katerima ima Parlament dnevne stike,
whereas Parliament works three weeks out of four in Brussels, where it has all the necessary facilities and where the Commission and the Council, with which Parliament interacts daily, are also located,
ker se mesečna pot v Strasbourg po javnem mnenju razume kot občutno razsipavanje, škoduje ugledu Evropske unije in je glede stroškov in neprijetnosti za Parlament, druge institucije, veleposlaništva, NVO in novinarje vedno bolj problematična,
whereas the monthly trip to Strasbourg is perceived as a considerable waste by public opinion, causing damage to the reputation of the European Union, and is increasingly problematic for Parliament, other institutions, embassies, NGOs and journalists who all incur cost and inconvenience,
ker imajo pristojnost odločanja o sedežu države članice,
whereas the decision on the seat lies with the Member States,
ker je Evropski svet strateški organ za oblikovanje politike EU ter nima dnevnih in stalnih stikov z drugimi institucijami; ker je zato primerno, da ima določeno distanco do tekočih postopkov Unije,
whereas the European Council is the strategic policy-making body of the EU and does not interact daily and continuously with the other institutions; whereas it is therefore appropriate that it should have a certain distance from the day-to-day procedures of the Union,
ker bi Evropski svet lahko imel seje v Strasbourgu, kar bi temu mestu dajalo prav toliko veljave in drugih ugodnosti in bi nadomestilo izgubo zasedanj Parlamenta,
whereas the European Council could meet in Strasbourg, which would confer just as much prestige and other benefits on Strasbourg, and compensate it for the loss of Parliament sittings,
ker se stavba Parlamenta v Strasbourgu lahko brez težav prilagodi in že vsebuje potrebne zmogljivosti za tisk in varnost,
whereas the Parliament building in Strasbourg can be easily adapted and already contains the necessary press and security facilities,
zahteva, da se za naslednjo medvladno konferenco dodeli zasedanje Evropskega parlamenta v Bruselj in Evropskega sveta v Strasbourg.
Calls for the next IGC to attribute the sessions of the European Parliament to Brussels and the European Council to Strasbourg.
ki ga vlagata Graham Booth in Vladimír Železný
by Graham Booth and Vladimír Železný
Sprememba členov 159, 161, 185
Amendment of Rules 159, 161 and 185
Glasovanje, elektronsko glasovanje in glasovanje v odboru
Voting, electronic voting and voting in committee
Člen 159
Rule 159
Pred glaso vanjem o katerem koli celotnem zakonodajnem dokumentu, predsednik vsakokrat preveri sklepčnost z uporabo elektronskega sistema glasovanja.
Before voting takes place on any entire piece of legislation the President shall take a fresh vote using the electronic voting system to verify that the quorum is present .
Ker trenutno veljavni člen 159, po katerem je običajni način glasovanja Parlamenta dvigovanje rok, vodi k številnim in ponavljajočim se napakam pri štetju, katerih posledica je nezakonito sprejetje ali zavrnitev predlogov sprememb in celotnih zakonodajnih dokumentov na plenarnem zasedanju in sejah odborov, skušata avtorja s tem predlogom spremembe zaustaviti nenehne motnje demokratičnega postopka odločanja Parlamenta in kot takojšnjo rešitev tega problema predlagata, da začne Parlament uporabljati elektronski sistem glasovanja kot običajni postopek.
As the current Rule 159, whereby Parliament’s normal method of voting is by show of hands, leads to numerous and repeated counting errors, which result in the unlawful adoption or rejection of amendments and entire pieces of legislation in plenary and committee, the authors aim with this amendment to stop the ongoing disruptions of Parliament’s democratic decision making, and propose as an immediate remedy to this that Parliament use the electronic voting system as standard procedure.
Rutinska uporaba elektronskega sistema glasovanja v Parlamentu bi povečala nespornost in legitimnost izidov glasovanja in hkrati znatno povečala verodostojnost Parlamenta v očeh državljanov držav članic EU in po svetu.
Routine use by Parliament of the electronic voting system would increase the validity and legitimacy of the results of votes cast, while substantially boosting Parliament’s credibility in the eyes of citizens of EU Member States and worldwide.
Rutinska uporaba elektronskega sistema glasovanja je dejansko najboljši način za preprečevanje napačnih ocen izida glasovanja in edini objektivni način za ugotavljanje prisotnosti večine ali kvalificirane večine, oziroma za ugotavljanje sklepčnosti na plenarnem zasedanju in sejah odborov.
The routine use of electronic voting is in fact the best way to prevent flawed estimates of the result of the vote and the only objective way of establishing whether a majority, or a qualified majority, exists or whether the quorum is present in plenary and in committee.
Člen 161
Rule 161
Predsednik lahko kadar koli sklene , da bo glasovanje, navedeno v členih 159, 160 in 162, potekalo s pomočjo elektronskega sistema glasovanja.
The President may at any time decide that the voting operations indicated in Rules 159, 160 and 162 shall be carried out by means of the electronic voting system.
Predsednik mora zagotoviti , da glasovanje, navedeno v členih 159, 160 in 162, poteka s pomočjo elektronskega sistema glasovanja.
The President must ensure that the voting operations indicated in Rules 159, 160 and 162 are carried out by means of the electronic voting system.
Za ohranitev notranje skladnosti Poslovnika EP avtorja predlagata, da se člen 161 spremeni v skladu s predlaganimi spremembami člena 159.
To preserve the internal coherence of the EP’s Rules of Procedure, the authors suggest amending Rule 161 in line with the proposed modifications to Rule 159.
Člen 185
Rule 185
Vsak poslanec lahko vloži predloge sprememb v obravnavo pristojnemu odboru.2.
Any Member may table amendments for consideration in the committee responsible.
V odboru se običajno glasuje z elektronskim sistemom glasovan ja.
In this case the vote shall be taken in accordance with Rule 160(2).
Ko slednjega iz tehničnih razlogov ni mogoče uporabiti, se glasuje z dvigovanjem rok ali z usedanjem in vstajanjem.
If the lat t er cannot be used for technical reasons, the vote may be taken by show of hands or by sitting and standing.
Poimensko glasovanje se izvede, če ga zahteva četrtina članov odbora.
A roll call vote shall be taken if a quarter of the committee’s members so request.
Za ohranitev notranje skladnosti Poslovnika EP avtorja predlagata, da se člen 185 spremeni v skladu s predlaganimi spremembami člena 159.
To preserve the internal coherence of the EP’s Rules of Procedure, the authors suggest amending Rule 185 in line with the proposed modifications to Rule 159.
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0020/2006 in B6‑0206/2006
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0020/2006 and B6-0206/2006
ki ga vlaga Giles Chichester
by Giles Chichester
o sklenitvi Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti s strani Evropske skupnosti
on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije o sklenitvi Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti s strani Evropske skupnosti (13886/1/2005, KOM (2005)0435 končno, 14. september 2005),
having regard to the Commission proposal on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty (13886/1/2005, COM (2005)0435 final, 14 September 2005),
ob upoštevanju besedila Sveta v zvezi s Sklepom Sveta o sklenitvi Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti s strani Evropske skupnosti ( C6-0435/2005 - 2005/0178 (AVC)),
having regard to the Council's text concerning a Council Decision on the conclusion by the European Community of the Energy Community Treaty ( C6-0435/2005 - 2005/0178 (AVC)),
ob upoštevanju pravne podlage za sklenitev Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti, ki dejansko omejuje vlogo Evropskega parlamenta, da poda ali odreče svojo privolitev za sklenitev pogodbe, in onemogoča njegovo učinkovito sodelovanje pri postopku odločanja,
having regard to the legal basis chosen for the conclusion of the Energy Community Treaty, which effectively limits the role of the European Parliament to giving its assent or withholding its assent to the conclusion of the Treaty, without effective participation by the European Parliament in the decision-making procedure,
ob upoštevanju zakonodajne resolucije na to temo z dne 17. maja 2006, v kateri je podal privolitev za sklenitev pogodbe,
having regard to its legislative resolution of 17 May 2006 giving its assent to the conclusion of the Treaty,
ugotavlja, da Evropska skupnost s sklenitvijo Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti v nekem smislu ustvarja precedenčni primer, saj pravni red Skupnosti za notranji trg na področju elektrike in zemeljskega plina razširja na devet pogodbenic omenjene pogodbe;
Notes that the EC, by means of the conclusion of this Energy Community Treaty (ECT), in a sense creates a precedent by extending the 'acquis communautaire' of the EC internal market in the field of electricity and gas to the nine contracting parties to the ECT;
zahteva, da se države udeleženke Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti jasno zavežejo k spoštovanju in izvajanju Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije;
Demands an unequivocal commitment by the ECT signatories to respect and implement the European Union Charter of Fundamental Rights;
ugotavlja tudi, da so med temi devetimi pogodbenicami tri države kandidatke (Bolgarija, Romunija in Hrvaška), ena je zaprosila za članstvo (Nekdanja jugoslovanska republika Makedonija), štiri so potencialne kandidatke (Albanija, Bosna in Hercegovina, Srbija in Črna gora), ena pa je pod začasno upravo Združenih narodov (Kosovo);
Notes also that, of the nine contracting parties to the Treaty, three are candidate countries (Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia), one has applied for membership (FYROM), four are potential candidates (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Montenegro) and one is under UN Interim Administration (Kosovo);
opozarja, da so bili za notranji trg ES sprejeti dodatni ukrepi, ki so bili oblikovani kot instrument podpore notranjemu trgu ali pa so bili potrebni za ublažitev morebitnih negativnih učinkov, medtem ko jih za Pogodbo o Energetski skupnosti Svet ne predvideva , kar lahko pripelje do resnega izkrivljanja konkurence med akterji EU zaradi zniževanja standardov na notranjem trgu EU; ugotavlja, da bodo zato vprašanja, povezana z zaposlovanjem, družbenimi vplivi in prestrukturiranjem, delovnimi pogoji, enakostjo, zdravjem in varnostjo, obveščenostjo in posvetovanjem ter socialnim dialogom, obravnavna v ločenem memorandumu o soglasju, katerega pravni status ni natančno določen; zahteva, da bi morali memorandum o soglasju podpisati Komisija, Svet in zadevne vlade, postati pa bi moral pravno zavezujoč instrument;
Points to the fact that whereas in the case of the EC internal market, additional measures conceived as instruments to support the internal market or considered necessary in order to mitigate any negative effects have been adopted, in the case of the ECT, the Council Decision foresees none and that this could lead to serious distortions of competition with EU players by undermining the standards applied in the EU internal market; notes that, therefore, matters relating to employment, social impact and restructuring, working conditions, equality, health and safety, information and consultation and social dialogue will be treated in a separate Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), whose legal status is not specified; demands that the MoU should be signed by the Commission, Council and governments concerned and should be developed to become a legally binding instrument;
podpira sodelovanje predstavnikov socialnih partnerjev iz držav podpisnic Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti v obstoječih evropskih odborih za sektorski socialni dialog, Evropska komisija pa mora to omogočiti;
Supports the participation of representatives of the social partners from the ECT signatory countries in the European sectoral social dialogue committees where established, which the Commission is to enable;
naroča Svetu in Komisiji, naj pojasnita vključitev določb in programov za povečanje energetske učinkovitosti, spodbujanje povpraševanja, obnovo energetske infrastrukture in podporo obnovljivim virom energije, predvsem da bi zmanjšali vsesplošno pomanjkanje energije, odvisnost od uvoza energije/ogljikovodikov ter škodljive učinke proizvodnje, prenosa in rabe energije na okolje; zlasti zahteva pojasnilo, kako države udeleženke Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti učinkovito izvajajo pravni red Skupnosti s področja energetske učinkovitosti, emisij plinskih, tekočih in trdnih onesnaževal ter podnebnih sprememb, kar je zelo pomembno za preprečevanje izkrivljanja konkurence med akterji EU;
Seeks clarification by the Council and the Commission of the inclusion of provisions and programmes to increase energy efficiency, prioritise the demand side, replace energy infrastructure and support renewable energy, notably to reduce widespread energy poverty, energy/hydrocarbon import dependence and the harmful environmental impact of energy production, transport and use; in particular, seeks clarification of the effective implementation by the ECT participants of the acquis regarding energy efficiency, gaseous, liquid and solid pollutant emissions and climate change as matters of the utmost importance to avoid distortion of competition with EU players;
svari pred privatizacijo javnih služb in nadomeščanjem javnih monopolov z zasebnimi, če še niso določena vsa pravila in predpisi za zagotavljanje obveznosti javnih storitev, zmernih cen in demokratičnega nadzora;
Calls for caution to be exercised in the privatisation of utilities and replacing public monopolies with private ones when not all rules and regulations are in place to ensure public service obligations, reasonable prices and democratic control;
poziva Komisijo, naj vse dopolnilne dokumente, ki so po mnenju Komisije ali Sveta sestavni del notranjega trga v povezavi s Pogodbo o Energetski skupnosti, še preden jih sprejme Svet ali Komisija, predloži v vednost Evropskemu parlamentu;
Calls upon the Commission, prior to their adoption by the Council or Commission, to submit to the EP for information all the complementary documents considered by the Commission or the Council to be integral to the internal market in connection with the ECT;
je zaskrbljen zaradi sprememb, ki jih je Svet vnesel v besedilo v zvezi s Sklepom Sveta o sklenitvi Pogodbe o Energetski skupnosti in s katerimi je obvezno posvetovanje z Evropskim parlamentom, predvideno v predlogu Komisije, spremenil v "obveščanje", kot je določeno v členu 5 sklepa Sveta;
Is concerned about changes made by the Council in the text relating to the Council Decision on the conclusion of the Energy Community Treaty, which transform the obligatory consultation with the European Parliament - as proposed in the Commission proposal - into an 'information exercise', as stipulated in Article 5 of the Council Decision;
zahteva, da se predstavnike Odbora za industrijo, raziskave in energetiko ter parlamentarne predstavnike zadevnih držav obvesti o sklepih Komisije in ministrskega sveta in se z njimi posvetuje ter da naj dobijo pristojnost, da predloge spremenijo; ugotavlja, da se morajo Evropski parlament, Komisija in Svet dogovoriti o ustreznem postopku;
Demands that representatives of its ITRE Committee, together with parliamentary representatives of the countries concerned, be informed and consulted on decisions of the Commission and Ministerial Council and that this group should have the power to amend proposals; notes that a procedure to this end needs to be discussed between the EP, Commission and Council;
meni, da je zaželeno, da se pravni predpis o medsebojni pomoči pogodbenic v primeru resnih motenj pri oskrbi z energijo lahko razširi tudi na druge sosednje države, "kadar gre za posebne okoliščine"; vseeno poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj pojasnita "posebne okoliščine" v ločenem izvedbenem ukrepu, ki bi se moral predložiti Evropskemu parlamentu za mnenje;
Considers it desirable that the legal provision of mutual assistance to the contracting parties in the event of serious disruptions of energy supply may be extended to other neighbouring countries 'in the event of special circumstances'; calls upon the Council and the Commission, nonetheless, to clarify the 'special circumstances' in a separate implementing measure that should be forwarded to Parliament for its opinion;