natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja na zaveze držav članic iz leta 2005 za doseganje cilja 0,7 % BND Evropske unije za uradno razvojno pomoč (ODA) leta 2015; meni, da je lahko podpora proračuna EU koristna spodbuda za pomoč državam članicam pri spoštovanju tega cilja; ponavlja svojo željo, da se Evropski razvojni sklad vključi zaradi povečanja preglednosti v splošni proračun skupaj s postopki odločanja, ki so spremljani in nadzorovani s strani Parlamenta;
Recalls the commitments made by the Member States in 2005 in view of reaching the target of 0,7 % of EU GNI for the official development assistance (ODA) in 2015; believes that the support of the EU budget can be a useful incentive to help the Member States to keep to this goal; reiterates its will to integrate the European Development Fund into the general budget so as to enhance transparency with its parliament-accompanied and -controlled decision-making procedures;
poziva novi Parlament, izvoljen v letu 2009, da zaradi preglednosti, vključi sredstva, ki se trenutno upravljajo izven proračuna v običajno proračunsko strukturo;
Invites the Parliament elected in 2009, for reasons of transparency, to incorporate funds currently operating outside the budget into the regular budget structure;
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 25. septembra 2003 o peti ministrski konferenci Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Cancunu UL C 77 E, 26.3.2004, str.
having regard to its resolutions of 25 September 2003 on the Fifth Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in Cancún OJ C 77 E, 26.3.2004, p.
, z dne 23. marca 2006 o vplivih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu na razvoj UL C 292 E, 1.12.2006, str.
, of 23 March 2006 on the development impact of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) OJ C 292 E, 1.12.2006, p.
, z dne 4. aprila 2006 o oceni pogajalskega kroga iz Dohe po ministrski konferenci Svetovne trgovinske organizacije v Hongkongu UL C 293 E, 2.12.2006, str.
, of 4 April 2006 on the assessment of the Doha Round following the WTO Ministerial Conference in Hong Kong OJ C 293 E, 2.12.2006, p.
, z dne 1. junija 2006 o trgovini in revščini: oblikovanje trgovinske politike, ki bo povečala prispevek trgovine k odpravi revščine UL C 298 E, 8.12.2006, str.
, of 1 June 2006 on trade and poverty: designing trade policies to maximise trade's contribution to poverty relief OJ C 298 E, 8.12.2006, p.
, z dne 23. maja 2007 o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu UL C 102 E, 24.4.2008, str.
(DDA), of 23 May 2007 on Economic Partnership Agreements OJ C 102 E, 24.4.2008, p.
, z dne 12. julija 2007 o sporazumu TRIPS in dostopu do zdravil UL C 175 E, 10.7.2008, str.
, of 12 July 2007 on the TRIPS Agreement and access to medicines OJ C 175 E, 10.7.2008, p.
ter svojega stališča z dne 5. junija 2008 o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 in spremembi uredb (ES) št. 552/97, (ES) št. 1933/2006 in uredb Komisije (ES) št. 964/2007 in (ES) št. 1100/2006 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0252 .
and its position of 5 June 2008 on the proposal for a Council regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 964/2007 and (EC) No 1100/2006 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0252 .
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2002 o priporočilu Komisiji v zvezi s pogajanji o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu z afriškimi, karibskimi in pacifiškimi (AKP) državami in regijami UL C 273 E, 14.11.2003, str.
having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2002 on its recommendation to the Commission concerning the negotiation of Economic Partnership Agreements with the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries and regions OJ C 273 E, 14.11.2003, p.
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. februarja 2009 o vplivih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu na razvoj Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0051 .
having regard to its resolution of 5 February 2009 on the development impact of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0051 .
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu in sodelovanju med državami Cariforuma na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi strani,
having regard to the Economic Partnership Agreement between the Cariforum States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part,
ob upoštevanju sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških držav (AKP) na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega v Cotonouju dne 23. junija 2000 (Sporazum iz Cotonouja),
having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000 (the Cotonou Agreement),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 23. oktobra 2007 z naslovom "Sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu" ( KOM(2007)0635 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 23 October 2007 on Economic Partnership Agreements ( COM(2007)0635 ),
ob upoštevanju Splošnega sporazuma o tarifah in trgovini, zlasti člena XXIV,
having regard to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), in particular Article XXIV thereof,
ob upoštevanju poročila in priporočil delovne skupine o pomoči za trgovino, ki jih je generalni svet Svetovne trgovinske organizacije sprejel dne 10. oktobra 2006,
having regard to the report and recommendations of the Task Force on Aid for Trade, adopted by the WTO General Council on 10 October 2006,
ob upoštevanju sporočila iz Gleneaglesa, ki ga je dne 8. julija 2005 sprejela skupina G8,
having regard to the Gleneagles Communiqué, adopted by the G8 on 8 July 2005,
ob upoštevanju člena 108(5) v povezavi s členom 103(2) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 108(5) in conjunction with Rule 103(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker od 1. januarja 2008 predhodni trgovinski odnosi EU z državami AKP, ki so jim omogočali prednostni dostop do trgov EU na nevzajemni podlagi, niso več v skladu s pravili Svetovne trgovinske organizacije,
whereas from 1 January 2008 the EU's previous trade relationship with the ACP countries – which gave the latter preferential access to EU markets on a non-reciprocal basis – no longer complied with the rules of the WTO,
ker sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu nedvomno pogojuje cilje in vsebino prihodnjih sporazumov med državami Cariforuma in drugimi trgovinskimi partnerji ter položaj regij pri pogajanjih,
whereas the EPA will inevitably condition the scope and content of future agreements made between Cariforum and other trading partners and the region's stance in the negotiations,
ker imajo države Cariforuma ločene načrte liberalizacije, ki se delno prekrivajo in se bodo sčasoma združili ter razvili v regionalni načrt; ker je cilj Karibske skupnosti (Caricom) vzpostaviti enotni trg do leta 2015,
whereas each of the Cariforum States has a separate liberalisation schedule, with a certain level of overlap between countries which converges over time, evolving into a regional schedule; whereas the Caribbean Community (Caricom) aims to establish a Single Market by 2015,
ker mora boljša pravila trgovanja spremljati večja podpora za pomoč, povezana s trgovino,
whereas improved trade rules must be accompanied by an increase in support for trade-related assistance,
ker je cilj strategije EU za pomoč trgovini podpreti zmožnost držav v razvoju, da izkoristijo nove trgovinske možnosti,
whereas the aim of the EU Strategy on Aid for Trade is to support developing countries' capacity to take advantage of new trade opportunities,
ker se zadnji stavek člena 139(2) sporazuma glasi: "Nobena določba tega sporazuma se ne razlaga tako, da zmanjšuje sposobnost pogodbenic in držav podpisnic Cariforuma za spodbujanje dostopa do zdravil",
whereas the last sentence of Article 139(2) of the Agreement states that 'Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as to impair the capacity of the Parties and the Signatory Cariforum States to promote access to medicines',
poudarja, da sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu ni mogoče šteti za zadovoljive, če ne dosegajo naslednjih ciljev: zagotovitve sredstev državam AKP za trajnostni razvoj, spodbujanja uspešnejšega vključevanja v svetovno trgovino in okrepitve procesa regionalizacije, oživitve trgovine med Evropsko unijo in državami AKP ter promocije gospodarske raznolikosti držav AKP;
Stresses that EPAs cannot be regarded as satisfactory unless they achieve the following objectives: offering the ACP countries support for sustainable development, promoting their participation in world trade, strengthening the regionalisation process, revitalising trade between the European Union and ACP countries and promoting the economic diversification of ACP countries;
opozarja, da mora sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu podpirati sestavo in vsebino ter duh razvojnih ciljev, politike in prednostnih nalog držav Cariforuma;
Recalls that the EPA must be supportive of the development objectives, policies and priorities of the Cariforum States, not only in its structure and content, but also in the manner and spirit of its implementation;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni svoje stališče o cilju EU, da bo onemogočala davčne oaze; v zvezi s tem opozarja, da je osem od štirinajstih držav Cariforuma, ki so podpisale sporazum o gospodarskem sodelovanju, na seznamu davčnih oaz Organizacije za gospodarsko sodelovanje in razvoj ter da sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu z državami Cariforuma omogoča liberalizacijo tekočih računov za vse prebivalce (člen 122), sprostitev kapitala za investitorje (člen 123) ter skoraj neomejene čezmejne dejavnosti finančnih storitev, vključno z delovanjem skrbniških storitev in trgovanje z izvedenimi finančni instrumenti na prostem trgu;
Calls on the Commission to clarify its stance on the stated EU objective of discouraging existing tax havens; recalls in this regard that eight out of the 14 Cariforum signatory states of the EPA are listed as tax havens by the OECD and that the Cariforum EPA provides for current account liberalisation for all residents (Article 122), capital account liberalisation for investors (Article 123), and almost unlimited cross-border activity of financial services, including the operation of "trust services" and "over-the-counter" trading of derivatives (Article 103, B-6);
poudarja, da je glavni cilj Sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu ES/Cariforum prispevati k uresničitvi razvojnih ciljev tisočletja z razvojnimi cilji, zmanjšanjem revščine in spoštovanjem temeljnih človekovih pravic;
Stresses that the principal aim of the EC-Cariforum EPA is to contribute, through development goals, poverty reduction and respect for fundamental human rights, to the achievement of the MDGs;
izraža zaskrbljenost, ker je kljub mandatu Komisije za pogajanje o sporazumih o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ki ga je Svet odobril dne 17. junija 2002, pri čemer se je poudarilo, naj se med pogajanji upoštevajo interesi najbolj oddaljenih regij Skupnosti, ter da bi v zvezi s tem sporazumi o gospodarskem sodelovanju vsebovali posebne ukrepe za pomoč proizvodom iz teh regij za njihovo kratkoročno vključitev v medregionalno trgovino, saj se v določbah Svetovne trgovinske organizacije interesi najbolj oddaljenih regij niso dovolj upoštevali v mnogi pogledih, ki so jih regionalni sveti posredovali Komisiji, kar je imelo za posledico, da se je vključitev najbolj oddaljenih regij v medregionalno trgovino zanemarila;
Is concerned that, despite the Commission's EPA negotiating mandate, approved by the Council on17 June 2002, which stated that during negotiations, account would be taken of the particular interests of the Community's outermost regions, and that in this respect, EPAs could in particular make provision for specific measures to assist products from these regions, with a view to their inclusion in the short term in interregional trade, pursuant to WTO provisions, the interests of the outermost regions have not been sufficiently taken into account in respect of many aspects that were communicated to the Commission by the regional councils, and that in consequence short-term inclusion of the outermost regions in interregional trade has been neglected;
opozarja, da je vzpostavitev resničnega regionalnega trga bistvena podlaga za uspešno izvajanje sporazumov o gospodarskem sodelovanju in da sta regionalno vključevanje in sodelovanje bistvena za družbeni in gospodarski razvoj držav Cariforuma;
Recalls that a genuine regional market is an essential basis for successfully implementing the EPA and that regional integration and cooperation are essential for the social and economic development of the Cariforum States;
poudarja, da je treba med izvajanjem sporazuma posvetiti ustrezno pozornost postopkom vključevanja v Cariforum in ciljem njegovega enotnega trga in gospodarstva, kot je predvideno v revidirani pogodbi iz Chataguaramasa;
Stresses that the implementation of the Agreement must pay due regard to the integration processes in Cariforum, including the aims and objectives of the Caricom Single Market and Economy (CSME) as outlined in the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas;
priznava, da so se države Cariforuma, ki so članice Karibske skupnosti, obvezale na tematskih področjih, ki še niso bila obravnavana ali v celoti izpeljana v enotnem trgu in gospodarstvu, vključno s finančnimi in drugimi storitvami, investicijami, konkurenčnostjo, javnimi naročili, elektronskim trgovanjem, intelektualnimi pravicami, prostim pretokom blaga in okoljem; poziva, naj se pri izvajanju teh določb ustrezno upošteva enotni trg in gospodarstvo na teh tematskih področjih, v skladu s členom 4(3) sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu ES/Cariforum;
Recognises that the Cariforum States that are members of Caricom have made commitments in subject areas not yet settled under the CSME or fully implemented, including financial services, other services, investment, competition, public procurement, e-commerce, intellectual property, free circulation of goods, and the environment; calls for due regard to the CSME in the implementation of provisions in these subject areas, in accordance with Article 4(3) of the EC-Cariforum EPA;
vztraja, da mora biti ob upoštevanju pariških načel o učinkovitosti pomoči pomoč med drugim usmerjena na potrebe, ter poziva države AKP, naj zato predlagajo dodatna sredstva, povezana s sporazumi o gospodarskem partnerstvu, zlasti glede regulativnih okvirov, zaščitnih ukrepov, spodbujanja trgovine, podpore pri izpolnjevanju mednarodnih sanitarnih in fitosanitarnih standardov ter standardov intelektualne lastnine in sestave nadzornega mehanizma sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu;
Insists that, in keeping with the Paris Principles on Aid Effectiveness, aid must inter alia be demand-driven, and therefore calls on the ACP to propose the necessary additional EPA-related funds, particularly with regard to regulatory frameworks, safeguard measures, trade facilitation, support in meeting international sanitary and phytosanitary and intellectual property standards and the composition of the EPA monitoring mechanism;
opozarja na sprejetje strategije EU za pomoč trgovini oktobra 2007 z obvezo k povečanju skupne pomoči EU, povezane s trgovino, na 2 milijardi EUR (2 000 000 000 EUR) letno do leta 2010 (1 milijardo EUR prispeva Skupnost in 1 milijardo EUR države članice); vztraja, da države Cariforuma prejmejo ustrezen in pravičen delež;
Recalls the adoption, in October 2007, of the EU Strategy on Aid for Trade, with the commitment to increase the collective EU trade-related assistance to EUR 2 billion (2 000 000 000) annually by 2010 (EUR 1 billion from the Community, EUR 1 billion from the Member States); insists that the Cariforum States receive an appropriate and equitable share;
poziva, naj se kmalu opredeli in priskrbi pravičen delež virov pomoči za trgovino; poudarja, da bi morale Komisija in države članice EU zagotoviti, da so ta sredstva dodatni viri in ne viri evropskega razvojnega sklada, ki jim je bila spremenjena namembnost, da so prilagojeni prednostnim nalogam Cariforuma ter da je njihovo posredovanje kar v največji meri usmerjeno prek sklada za regionalni razvoj in je pravočasno, predvidljivo in v skladu z načrti izvajanja nacionalnih in regionalnih strategij; priporoča Komisiji in državam Cariforuma, naj ta sredstva učinkovito uporabijo, da bi pripomogle k nadomestitvi morebitne izgube carinskih prihodkov ter se soočile s konkurenčnostjo in potrebami za krepitev razvoja;
Calls for an early determination and provision of an equitable share of the Aid for Trade resources; stresses that the Commission and the EU Members States should ensure that these funds represent additional resources and are not merely a repackaging of the European Development Fund (EDF) funding, that they conform to Cariforum priorities and that their disbursement is channelled through the Regional Development Fund to the greatest extent possible and is timely, predictable and in harmony with the execution schedules of national and regional strategic development plans; recommends to the Commission and the Cariforum States that they make efficient use of these funds in order to help compensate for the possible loss of customs revenues and to address competitiveness and development-enhancing needs;
opaža, da je za Bahame, Antigvo in Barbados verjetna izguba dohodka zaradi liberalizacije trgovine; sprejema dejstvo, da je za druge države Cariforuma večina izvoza EU v Cariforum že oproščena trgovinskih ovir ali pa bo večji del liberalizacije potekal med desetim in petnajstim letom po časovnem razporedu izvajanja;
Notes that for Bahamas, Antigua and Barbados, customs revenue loss through trade liberalisation is frontloaded; accepts that for other Cariforum States a substantial proportion of EU exports is either already free of trade barriers or the bulk of the liberalisation will occur in years 10-15 of the implementation timetable;
poudarja, da morajo po potrebi brezcarinske in brezkvotne pobude spremljati veilke spremembe pravil glede izvora, da bi se povzročil občuten porast izvoza blaga; s tem v zvezi pozdravlja nedavne izjave Komisije, da bi lahko v skladu z načelom kumulacije v členu 10 nadgradili pravila glede izvora;
Stresses that, if necessary, substantial changes to rules of origin should accompany the duty-free, quota-free (DFQF) initiative to produce a significant increase in goods exports; in this regard welcomes the recent statements by the Commission that the Rules of Origin could be upgraded under Article 10 in line with the accumulation principle;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu redno poroča o razsežnostih izkoriščanja patentov in sporov iz Pogodbe o sodelovanju na področju patentov; poziva Komisijo, naj redno predstavlja poročila o izvajanju obvez glede prenosa tehnologij iz sporazuma; poziva Komisijo, naj ne poskuša usklajevati standardov za pravice intelektualne lastnine bolj, kot je primerno za stopnjo razvoja v državah Cariforuma; poudarja, da je pomembno, da se državam Cariforuma pomaga pri spremljanju protikonkurečnega ravnanja v farmacevtskem sektorju;
Calls on the Commission to report regularly to Parliament on the extent of patent applications and litigation under the Patent cooperation Treaty; calls on the Commission to provide regular reports on the implementation of the technology transfer commitments in the Agreement; urges the Commission not to seek to harmonise intellectual property rights standards upwards beyond what is appropriate for the level of development of the Cariforum States; stresses the importance of assisting Cariforum countries in monitoring anti-competitive behaviour in the pharmaceutical sector;
poziva pogajalce končnih sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, naj prevzamejo polno odgovornost nad preglednostjo upravljanja z naravnimi viri ter opišejo zglede najboljše prakse, ki so potrebni, da lahko države AKP kar najbolje izkoristijo te vire;
Urges the negotiators of any full EPA to account fully for the transparent management of natural resources and to outline the best practices necessary for the ACP countries to make the maximum gains from such resources;
poudarja, da bi sporazum o gospodarskem partnerstvu moral upoštevati posebne interese malih in srednjih podjetij obeh strani;
Stresses that the EPA should take into account the specific interests of small and medium-sized enterprises of both parties;
poziva Evropsko unijo, naj pri vseh subregionalnih skupinah AKP uporabi načelo države z največjimi ugodnostmi;
Calls on the application by the European Union of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) principle among all the ACP sub-regional groups;
priznava, da države Cariforuma in druge podregionalne skupine v razmerju do Evropske unije izvajajo načelo države z največjimi ugodnostmi;
Recognises the selective application of MFN treatment to the European Union by Cariforum and other sub-regional groups;
meni, da bi morali ob upoštevanju določb za posebno in diferencirano obravnavo, vključenih v člen 5 sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ustrezni kazalci razvoja v tem sporazumu služiti trem ključnim namenom, da bi dosegli cilj zmanjšanja revščine: spodbuditi države Cariforuma k izvajanju zavez sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu ali jih usposobiti v primeru odstopanj; spremljanje učinkov izvajanja sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu na trajnostni razvoj in zmanjšanje revščine; ter spremljanje izvajanja obvez ES, zlasti izplačevanja in učinkovitega zagotavljanja obljubljene finančne in tehnične pomoči;
Considers that taking into account the special and differential treatment provisions included in Article 5 of the EPA and, in view of achieving the goal of poverty reduction, suitable EPA development indicators should serve three key purposes: to trigger implementation of EPA commitments by Cariforum States or to qualify them for exemptions; to monitor the impact of EPA implementation on sustainable development and poverty reduction; and to monitor the implementation of EC commitments, in particular disbursement and effective delivery of pledged financial and technical assistance;
poziva Komisijo, naj podpre vzpostavljanje neodvisnih mehanizmov nadzora znotraj držav Cariforuma z zadostnimi sredstvi za izvajanje potrebnih analiz, s katerimi bi ugotovili, do katere mere se uresničujejo cilji sporazuma o gospodarskem partnerstvu;
Requests the Commission to support the establishment of an independent monitoring mechanism within the Cariforum States endowed with the necessary resources to undertake the analysis necessary to determine the extent to which the EPA is achieving its objectives;
meni, da je za izvajanje sporazuma o gospodarskem sodelovanju bistveno vzpostaviti primeren sistem nadzora, ki ga bo usklajeval zadevni parlamentarni odbor, v katerem bodo sodelovali člani Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in Odbora za razvoj, in bo zagotavljal ustrezno ravnotežje med ohranjanjem vodilne vloge Odbora za mednarodno trgovino in splošno usklajenostjo glede trgovinskih in razvojnih politik; meni, da bi moral ta parlamentarni odbor delovati prilagodljivo in svoje delo dejavno usklajevati z delom Skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU;
Considers it important that implementation of the EPAs should involve the establishment of an appropriate monitoring system coordinated by the relevant parliamentary committee and involving members of the Committee on International Trade and of the Committee on Development, ensuring an adequate balance between the maintenance of the leading role of the Committee on International Trade and overall consistency on trade and development policies; considers that this parliamentary committee should operate in a flexible manner and actively coordinate its work with the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (JPA);