natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
vztraja, da je treba pripraviti celovito strategijo EU za regije z geografskimi posebnostmi, da bi se lahko bolje soočale s težavami in izzivi; meni, da bi bilo treba v tej strategiji poudariti teritorialno razsežnost kohezijske politike in se osredotočiti na prilagajanje politike EU posebnim potrebam in prostorskim vrednostim teh regij; poudarja, da je izvajanje takšne strategije bistveno za gospodarski in družbeni razvoj teh ozemelj; meni, da je zelo pomembno oblikovati nove kazalnike za boljši opis razmer in težav na terenu, da bi bilo izvajanje tovrstne strategije EU uspešno;
Reiterates its long-standing request for the development of a comprehensive EU strategy for regions with specific geographical features, which will enable them better to address the problems and challenges that they are facing; believes that an EU strategy should emphasise the territorial dimension of cohesion policy and be concerned on how to adapt EU policies to the specific needs and assets of those territories; stresses that the implementation of such a strategy is an essential condition for the economic and social development of those territories; believes that the elaboration of new indicators for the purpose of better describing the situation and problems on the ground is very important for the successful implementation of an EU strategy in this field;
obenem poudarja, da opredelitev dodatnih kazalnikov in izvedba teritorialnih ocen ne sme povzročiti več birokracije ali zamud pri izvajanju novih politik in ukrepov, ki podpirajo teritorialno kohezijo; poudarja, da so zaradi vključitve teritorialne kohezije v naslednji sklop programov iz strukturnih skladov potrebni neposredni rezultati;
Stresses, however, that the elaboration of additional indicators and the conduct of territorial assessments should not lead to more bureaucracy or further delays in the implementation of new policies and actions in support of territorial cohesion; stresses the need for direct results resulting from the incorporation of territorial cohesion in the next set of Structural Funds programmes;
opominja, da imajo mikro ter mala in srednje velika podjetja (MSP), kot tudi obrtna podjetja, pomembno vlogo pri uresničevanju ekonomske, socialne in teritorialne kohezije ter pri povečevanju konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja v regijah; zato poziva Komisijo, naj izvede posebno študijo vplivov in učinkovitosti strukturnih skladov in politik EU za mala in srednje velika podjetja v regijah ter analizo upravnih in finančnih težav, s katerim se ta podjetja srečujejo;
Recalls the important role played by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and micro enterprises as well as craft businesses in economic, social and territorial cohesion and points to their importance for enhancing competitiveness and employment in the regions; therefore, invites the Commission to carry out a specific analysis of the impact and effectiveness of the Structural Funds and EU policies aimed at SMEs in the regions, as well as of the administrative and financial difficulties encountered by those SMEs;
poziva Komisijo, države članice in regije, naj izvajajo aktivno politiko, ki bo podpirala inovativnost in konkurenčnost podjetij ter omogočala vzajemno sodelovanje med podjetji, javnim sektorjem, šolami in univerzami, ter naj zagotovijo, da bodo lahko organizacije, ki zastopajo mala in srednja podjetja, neposredno sodelovale pri opredelitvi prostorske politike;
Calls on the Commission, the Member States and the regions, furthermore, to pursue an active policy that supports innovation and competitiveness of enterprises and allows for mutual cooperation between businesses, the public sector, schools and universities, and to ensure that organisations representing SMEs can participate directly in defining territorial policies;
odločno poziva države članice, naj si bolj prizadevajo, da bi izpolnile cilje iz naslova 4 prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje Teritorialne agende Evropske unije, in sicer z ustvarjanjem znanja o teritorialni koheziji in trajnostnem prostorskem načrtovanju, vzpostavljanjem možnosti ter študijo vplivov, ter priznava, da ima v tem procesu osrednjo vlogo ESPON;
Urges the Members States to intensify their efforts to meet the objectives of the heading 4 of the First Action Programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union in creating knowledge on territorial cohesion and sustainable spatial planning, building perspectives and analysing impacts and acknowledges the central role played by ESPON in this process;
ugotavlja, da bodo podnebne spremembe močno vplivale na teritorialno kohezijo; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede študijo o negativnih vplivih podnebnih sprememb v posameznih regijah, saj se vplivi po pričakovanjih na različnih območjih v Evropski uniji razlikujejo; meni, da je treba pri politiki teritorialne kohezije ustrezno upoštevati cilje proti podnebnim spremembam ter spodbujati vzorce trajnostnega razvoja na ozemljih EU; vendar priznava, da bi bilo treba o boju proti podnebnim spremembam obsežno razpravljati tudi na drugih področjih politike EU;
Notes that climate change will have significant repercussions for territorial cohesion; requests that the Commission proceed with an analysis of the negative effects of climate change in different regions, given that the impact is expected to vary across the European Union; considers that territorial cohesion should take due account of climate change objectives and stimulate sustainable development patterns in EU territories; acknowledges, however, that the fight against climate change should also largely be addressed in other EU policies;
z velikim zanimanjem ugotavlja, da so v petem poročilu o napredku prvič izrecno omenjene regije v prehodnem obdobju, ki so umeščene med konvergenčne regije in regije s ciljem regionalne konkurenčnosti in zaposlovanja; priznava, da je treba ločeno obravnavati te regije, ki so zdaj v obdobju uvajanja ali v obdobju postopnega izločanja in razpete med obema ciljema; poziva Komisijo, naj v smislu teritorialne kohezije vzpostavi obsežnejši sistem pomoči za postopen prehod za regije, ki bodo kmalu presegle prag 75 % BDP, da bi jim omogočila jasnejši položaj in več varnosti pri razvoju; meni, da bi bilo treba uvesti tudi prehodni mehanizem za države članice, ki niso več upravičene do prejemanja sredstev iz Kohezijskega sklada;
Notes with great interest that the Fifth Progress Report, for the first time, makes specific reference to 'transition regions', which are situated between 'convergence regions' and 'competitiveness and employment regions'; acknowledges the need to deal separately with those regions that are now scattered as 'phasing in' or 'phasing out' regions between the two Objectives; calls on the Commission, in the context of territorial cohesion, to establish a more comprehensive system of gradual transitional assistance to regions that will soon be above the 75 % GDP threshold, in order to provide them with a clearer status and more security in their development; considers that a transitional system also needs to be established for Member States dropping out of the Cohesion Fund;
meni, da bo imel celovit pristop več možnosti za uspeh, če bodo regionalni in lokalni organi ter druge zainteresirane strani, vključno z ekonomskimi, socialnimi in drugimi partnerji v skladu s členom 11 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1083/2006 z dne 11. julija 2006 o splošnih določbah o Evropskem skladu za regionalni razvoj, Evropskem socialnem skladu in Kohezijskem skladu UL L 210, 31.7.2006, str.
Considers that taking an integrated approach will have a greater chance of success if the regional and local authorities, as well as stakeholders, including economic, social and other partners in accordance with Article 11 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p.
, ki imajo splošen pregled ter razumejo potrebe in posebnosti posameznih območij, že od začetka sodelovali pri oblikovanju in izvajanju razvojnih strategij za posamezna območja; poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi smernice, ki bodo državam članicam ter regionalnim in lokalnim organom v pomoč, da bodo celovit pristop izvajale čim učinkoviteje in vzpostavile učinkovita partnerstva pri razvoju strategij za zadevna ozemlja v prihodnje;
, who can provide an overall view and understanding of the needs and specificities of a given territory, are involved from the beginning in the designing and implementation of the development strategies of each territory; calls on the Commission to draw up guidelines to help Member States, as well as regional and local authorities to implement the integrated approach in the most efficient way and to establish effective partnerships in the development of future strategies for the territories concerned;
priznava, da mora teritorialna kohezija privesti do izboljšanja upravljanja kohezijske politike; soglaša s stališčem, da je treba različne težave obravnavati na različnih teritorialnih ravneh in da je zato prvi pogoj v procesu snovanja teritorialne kohezije vzpostavitev resničnega partnerstva med vsemi stranmi regionalnega in lokalnega razvoja na ravni EU ter nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj si čim bolj prizadevajo razviti takšno teritorialno upravljanje na več ravneh; meni, da bi bilo treba teritorialno kohezijo usmeriti v prepoznavanje ustrezne teritorialne ravni za obravnavanje posamezne politike ali ukrepa na način, ki bo čim bližji državljanu;
Recognises that territorial cohesion should lead to improved governance of cohesion policy; agrees with the view that different territorial scales are needed for different problems and that, therefore, the establishment of real partnerships between all the parties involved in regional and local development at EU, national, regional and local level, is a precondition for the process of designing territorial cohesion and calls on the Commission and the Member States to make all efforts to develop such a multi-level territorial governance; considers that territorial cohesion should focus on identifying the appropriate territorial level for addressing each policy or measure in a way that is as close as possible to the citizen;
poudarja, da se upravljanje s pomočjo politik EU, zlasti kohezijske politike, spreminja iz sistema, ki je bil pogosto centraliziran, v vse bolj celovit sistem na več ravneh; poziva vse akterje, javne organe in državljane, naj vzpostavijo formalen sistem teritorialnega upravljanja, ki bo temeljil na večsektorskem, teritorialnem celovitem pristopu od spodaj navzgor, da bi se usklajeno in učinkovito odzvale na prav vsako potrebo državljanov oziroma uporabnikov na področju, ki ustreza tej potrebi; pri tem opozarja na uspešnost pobud EU, kot so Urban I in II za mestna območja ter Leader za podeželja;
Emphasises that EU policies, and more particularly the EU cohesion policy, have transformed governance from an often centralised system into an increasingly integrated, multi-level system; calls on stakeholders, public authorities and citizens to establish a formal system of territorial governance, based on a multi-sectoral, territorial and bottom-up integrated approach, in order to respond in a coherent and effective way to a single need of its citizens or users, in an area corresponding to this need; recalls, in this respect, the successful experiences of EU initiatives, such as Urban I and Urban II for urban areas and Leader in rural areas;
poudarja, da so težave pri izvajanju strukturne politike delno nastale zaradi preveč togih in zapletenih postopkov in bi zato bilo treba razmisliti o njihovi poenostavitvi ter jasni razdelitvi odgovornosti in pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo, državami članicami ter regionalnimi in lokalnimi organi; meni, da bo teritorialno upravljanje močno odvisno od vzpostavitve takšnih jasnih pravil, ter ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj v zvezi s tem nemudoma pripravi sveženj konkretnih predlogov;
Recalls that problems in implementing structural policy are due in part to the excessive rigidity and complexity of procedures and that, consequently, consideration should be given to simplifying those procedures and clearly dividing responsibilities and competences between the European Union, the Member States and regional and local authorities; considers that territorial governance will depend strongly on the establishment of such clear rules; reiterates its call to the Commission to come forward without delay with a set of concrete proposals to that effect;
priporoča, da se zaradi vse večjega pomena teritorialne kohezije ne samo v okviru regionalne politike, temveč tudi drugih sektorskih politik Skupnosti, neformalne strukture, ki so dolgo urejale teritorialno kohezijo in prostorsko načrtovanje v Svetu, nadomestijo s formalnimi ministrskimi sestanki, na katerih naj se srečujejo ministri, ki so v Evropski uniji pristojni za regionalno politiko; meni, da bi takšen institucionalni razvoj v Svetu zagotovil boljšo izmenjavo informacij ter hiter razvoj teritorialne kohezijske politike;
Recommends that, in light of the increasing importance that territorial cohesion has acquired in the context not only of regional but also of other sectoral EU policies, the informal structures that have long been governing territorial cohesion and spatial planning in the Council should be replaced by formal ministerial meetings, which should convene the Ministers responsible for regional policy in the European Union; believes that such an institutional development in the Council would ensure a better flow of information as well as the rapid development of the territorial cohesion policy;
poziva države članice, naj začnejo proučevati možnosti, kako bi lahko bolje utrdile in izvajale pojem teritorialne kohezije v svojih nacionalnih programih in politikah; v zvezi s tem meni, da bi morale v prostorsko načrtovanje že vključiti osnovni načeli policentričnega razvoja in partnerstva med mesti in podeželjem ter dosledno izvajanje omrežja Natura 2000;
Urges the Member States to start reflecting now on how better to consolidate and implement the notion of territorial cohesion in their national programmes and policies; considers, in this context, that the basic principles of polycentric development and urban-rural partnership, as well as the full implementation of Natura 2000 should already be integrated in their regional planning;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009 o urbani razsežnosti kohezijske politike v novem programskem obdobju ( 2008/2130(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 on the urban dimension of cohesion policy in the new programming period ( 2008/2130(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 158 in člena 159 Pogodbe ES,
having regard to Articles 158 and 159 of the EC Treaty,
ob upoštevanju prvega akcijskega programa za izvajanje teritorialne agende Evropske unije ("prvi akcijski program"), sprejetega na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, pristojnih za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj, v Ponta Delgadi (Azori) 23. in 24. novembra 2007,
having regard to the First Action Programme for the Implementation of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union ('the First Action Programme'), adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and development held in Ponta Delgada (Azores) on 23-24 November 2007,
ob upoštevanju teritorialne agende Evropske unije - K bolj konkurenčni in trajnostni Evropi različnih regij ("teritorialna agenda") ter leipziške listine o trajnostnih evropskih mestih ("leipziška listina"), ki sta bili sprejeti na neuradnem zasedanju sveta ministrov, pristojnih za prostorsko načrtovanje in razvoj mest, v Leipzigu 24. in 25. maja 2007,
having regard to the Territorial Agenda of the EU - Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions ('the Territorial Agenda') and the Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities ('the Leipzig Charter'), which were both adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning and urban development held in Leipzig on 24-25 May 2007,
ob upoštevanju bristolskega sporazuma, sprejetega na neuradnem zasedanju Sveta ministrov na temo trajnostnih skupnosti v Bristolu 6. in 7. decembra 2005,
having regard to the "Bristol Accord" adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers on sustainable communities held in Bristol on 6-7 December 2005,
ob upoštevanju nove atenske listine, ki je bila razglašena 20. novembra 2003 na zasedanju evropskega sveta urbanistov,
having regard to the New Charter of Athens 2003, proclaimed at the European Council of Town Planners in Lisbon on 20 November 2003 and its vision for the future of European cities,
ob upoštevanju akcijskega programa iz Lilla, sprejetega na neuradnem zasedanju Sveta ministrov, pristojnih za urbanizem, v Lillu 3. novembra 2000,
having regard to the "Lille Action Programme" adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for urban affairs held in Lille on 3 November 2000,
ob upoštevanju evropske perspektive prostorskega razvoja, sprejete na neuradnem zasedanju Sveta ministrov, pristojnih za prostorsko načrtovanje, v Potsdamu 11. maja 1999,
having regard to the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP), adopted at the Informal Council of Ministers responsible for spatial planning held in Potsdam on 11 May 1999,
ob upoštevanju listine o velemestih in mestih, ki si prizadevajo za trajnostni razvoj, sprejete na evropski konferenci trajnostnih velemest in mest v Aalborgu na Danskem 27. maja 1994,
having regard to the Charter of European Cities and Towns towards Sustainability as approved at the European Conference on Sustainable Cities and Towns in Aalborg, Denmark on 27 May 1994,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 19. junija 2008 z naslovom "Peto poročilo o napredku na področju gospodarske in socialne kohezije: rastoče regije, rastoča Evropa" ( KOM(2008)0371 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 19 June 2008 entitled "Fifth progress report on economic and social cohesion: Growing regions, growing Europe" ( COM(2008)0371 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 14. maja 2008 z naslovom "Rezultati pogajanj glede strategij in programov kohezijske politike za programsko obdobje 2007–2013" ( KOM(2008)0301 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 14 May 2008 entitled "The results of the negotiations concerning cohesion policy strategies and programmes for the programming period 2007-2013" ( COM(2008)0301 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 30. maja 2007 z naslovom "Četrto poročilo o gospodarski in socialni koheziji" ( KOM(2007)0273 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 30 May 2007 entitled "Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion" ( COM(2007)0273 ),
ob upoštevanju priročnika Komisije o urbani razsežnosti v politikah Skupnosti za obdobje 2007–2013, sprejetega 24. maja 2007,
having regard to the Guide from the Commission on "The urban dimension in Community policies for the period 2007 – 2013" adopted on 24 May 2007,
ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije o teritorialni in urbani razsežnosti v nacionalnih strateških referenčnih okvirih in operativnih programih v obdobju 2007–2013 (prva ocena) iz maja 2007,
having regard to the Working Paper of the Commission on "The territorial and urban dimension in the national strategic reference frameworks and operational programmes (2007 – 2013): A first assessment" from May 2007,
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 13. julija 2006 z naslovom "Kohezijska politika in mesta: prispevek mest in naselij k rasti in zaposlovanju v regijah" ( KOM(2006)0385 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 13 July 2006 entitled "Cohesion Policy and cities: the urban contribution to growth and jobs in the regions" ( COM(2006)0385 ),
ob upoštevanju Sklepa Sveta 2006/702/ES z dne 6. oktobra 2006 o strateških smernicah Skupnosti o koheziji UL L 291, 21.10.2006, str.
having regard to the Council Decision 2006/702/EC of 6 October 2006 on Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion OJ L 291, 21.10.2006, p.
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. julija 2005 z naslovom "Kohezijska politika za podporo rasti in novim delovnim mestom: strateške smernice skupnosti, 2007–2013" ( KOM(2005)0299 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 5 July 2005 entitled "Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013" ( COM(2005)0299 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 14. junija 2002 o načrtovanju strukturnih skladov za obdobje 2000–2006: začetna ocena pobude Urban ( KOM(2002)0308 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 14 June 2002 entitled "The programming of the Structural Funds 2000-2006: an initial assessment of the Urban Initiative" ( COM(2002)0308 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 6. maja 1997 z naslovom "Urbani agendi v Evropski uniji naproti" ( KOM(1997)0197 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication of 6 May 1997 entitled "Towards an urban agenda in the European Union" ( COM(1997)0197 ),
ob upoštevanju rezultatov programa evropskega omrežja za spremljanje prostorskega načrtovanja (ESPON) iz leta 2006 ter njegovega programa za leto 2013,
having regard to the results of the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network (ESPON) 2006 Programme and the adopted ESPON 2013 Programme,
ob upoštevanju rezultatov urbanih pilotnih projektov (1989–1999) ter pobud Skupnosti URBAN I (1994–1999) in URBAN II (2000–2006),
having regard to the results of the Urban Pilot Projects (1989-1999), Community initiative URBAN I (1994-1999) and URBAN II (2000-2006),
ob upoštevanju podatkov iz projektne zbirke podatkov Urban Audit, ki vsebuje statistične podatke s 330 kazalniki o 358 evropskih mestih,
having regard to the information from the database of the Urban Audit that provides statistics with 330 indicators on 358 European cities,
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 21. februarja 2008 o spremljanju izvajanja Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine: Evropskemu akcijskemu programu za prostorski razvoj in ozemeljsko kohezijo naproti Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2008)0069 .
having regard to its resolution of 21 February 2008 on the follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter : Towards a European Action Programme for Spatial Development and Territorial Cohesion Texts adopted, P6_TA(2008)0069 .
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za regionalni razvoj ( A6-0031/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Development ( A6-0031/2009 ),
ker sicer velja, da urbanizem spada v pristojnost nacionalnih, regionalnih in lokalnih organov, vendar ima ključno vlogo pri učinkovitem izvajanju lizbonske in göteborške strategije ter zaseda zelo pomembno mesto v kohezijski politiki, za katero so pristojne institucije Evropske unije,
whereas it is recognised that whilst urban issues fall under the responsibility of national, regional, and local authorities, urban areas nevertheless play a key role in the effective implementation of the Lisbon and Gothenburg Strategies and are therefore viewed as a high priority in cohesion policy, for which the EU institutions have a responsibility,
ker je med cilji Evropske unije, ki so navedeni v leipziški listini, zagotovitev celovitega pristopa k izvajanju politike razvoja mest, da se ustvarijo kakovostna urbana območja, posodobijo javne službe, transportno, energetsko in informacijsko omrežje ter spodbudijo vseživljenjsko učenje, izobraževanje in inovacije zlasti v prikrajšanih mestnih središčih,
whereas the EU's objectives as set out in the Leipzig Charter are to ensure an integrated approach to urban development policy implementation in order to create high quality urban spaces, to modernise transport, energy, public utilities and information networks, and to encourage life-long learning, education and innovation particularly in deprived inner cities and areas,