natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja določbe Sveta, da obstoj dvostranskih dialogov ali posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah ne sme zmanjšati mednarodnega pritiska, ki ga izvaja EU, kadar v dani državi pride do kršitev človekovih pravic, ter poudarja, da je bistveno, da se dialog in posvetovanje podpre z ustreznim diplomatskim in političnim pritiskom na vseh ravneh, tudi na organe Združenih narodov in zlasti na njihov Svet za človekove pravice;
Welcomes the Council's stipulation that the existence of bilateral human rights dialogues or consultations should not have the effect of reducing the international pressure exerted by the EU when human rights violations occur in a given country, and points out that it is essential for dialogue or consultation to be backed up by appropriate diplomatic and political pressure at every level, extending to United Nations bodies and its Human Rights Council, in particular;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da analizirata, podpirata in usklajujeta določanje meril uspešnosti za dialog in posvetovanje EU o človekovih pravicah z ukrepi drugih donatorjev in mednarodnih organizacij, s posebnim poudarkom na sedanjih mehanizmih ZN (poročila posebnih poročevalcev, strokovni odbori, generalni sekretar, Svet za človekove pravice, visoki komisar za človekove pravice itd.); meni, da se morata Svet in Komisija pri svojem splošnem pristopu k obravnavanju vprašanj človekovih pravic v okviru političnega dialoga sistematično sklicevati na obljube, ki so jih na volitvah sprejele države članice Sveta za človekove pravice Združenih narodov;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to analyse, support and coordinate the setting of benchmarks for EU human rights dialogue or consultation with actions of other donors and international organisations, with a special focus on the UN mechanisms in place (reports of the Special Rapporteurs, expert committees, the Secretary-General, the Human Rights Council, the High Commissioner for Human Rights, etc.); considers that, in their overall approach to raising human rights issues in the context of political dialogue, the Council and the Commission should systematically refer to the pledges made upon election by the Member States of the UN Human Rights Council;
priporoča uporabo ustreznih ureditev, da se omogoči uskladitev kazalnikov in ciljev s kazalniki in cilji tretjih držav ter mednarodnih organov, ki sodelujejo v dialogu in posvetovanjih o človekovih pravicah z isto državo ali skupino držav; priporoča, da se takšne ureditve oblikujejo na podlagi bernskega postopka, ki ga je oblikovala Švica za odnose s Kitajsko, ter da se za ta namen ustanovijo neuradni forumi, v katerih se izmenjujejo informacije in dobra praksa;
Recommends that appropriate arrangements be put in place to enable indicators and objectives to be harmonised with other third countries and international bodies carrying on a human rights dialogue or consultation with the same given country or group of countries; recommends that such arrangements be modelled on the Berne Process, established by Switzerland for relations with China, and that, to that end, informal forums be set up in which to exchange information and good practice;
Večja preglednost dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah ter zanimanje javnosti zanje
Increasing the transparency of, and publicity given to, human rights dialogues and consultations
meni, da je treba dialog in posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah izvajati na bolj pregleden in usklajen način, ter poziva k ustreznim ukrepom za uresničitev tega cilja, ne da bi se pri tem ogrozila učinkovitost dialoga in posvetovanj;
Considers that the human rights dialogue and consultations should be conducted in a more transparent and coordinated way, and calls for appropriate means to be sought to achieve this aim without jeopardising the effectiveness of the dialogue and consultation;
razume potrebo po spoštovanju določene ravni zaupnosti v dialogih in posvetovanjih ter poziva k pozitivnemu odgovoru na zahtevo za vzpostavitev sistema v sodelovanju s Parlamentom, pri čemer je izbranim poslancem mogoče zagotoviti informacije o zaupnih dejavnostih v zvezi z dialogom in posvetovanji o človekovih pravicah ter s tem povezanimi postopki; ponovno predlaga, da se takšen sistem oblikuje na merilih, ki jih je že opredelil Medinstitucionalni sporazum z dne 20. novembra 2002 med Evropskim parlamentom in Svetom o dostopu Evropskega parlamenta do občutljivih podatkov Sveta na področju a varnostne in obrambne politike UL C 298, 30.11.2002, str.
Understands the need to respect a certain level of confidentiality in the dialogues and consultations and calls for a favourable response to the request to set up a system, in collaboration with Parliament, whereby selected Members of Parliament could be supplied with information about confidential activities connected with the human rights dialogue or consultation and related procedures; proposes once again that such a system be modelled on the criteria already established by the inter-institutional agreement of 20 November 2002 between the European Parliament and the Council concerning access by the European Parliament to sensitive information of the Council in the field of security and defence policy OJ C 298, 30.11.2002, p.
poziva Svet, naj zagotovi posvetovanje z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi, zlasti s Parlamentom in nevladnimi organizacijami, preden EU določi posebne cilje, ki jih je treba doseči z dialogom ali posvetovanji z zadevno državo, ali določi merila za analizo napredka, ki je bil dosežen glede na vnaprej določena merila uspešnosti, ter merila glede morebitne izhodne strategije;
Calls on the Council to ensure that, before the EU sets the specific goals to be attained by entering into a dialogue or consultation with the country in question, or lays down the criteria for analysing the progress achieved in the light of the predetermined benchmarks, and the criteria regarding a possible exit strategy, consultations are first held with all interested parties, especially with Parliament and with NGOs;
meni, da je treba določiti posebne cilje za vsak dialog in posvetovanje z uporabo vseh dokumentov, ki so jih pripravili Svet, države članice, Komisija in Parlament, ter poročil mednarodnih in lokalnih organizacij za človekove pravice, da se določijo cilji dialoga ali posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah s tretjo državo, ter poziva k najboljšemu postopanju, da se pridobijo oprijemljivi rezultati, katere se analizira; meni, da bi bilo treba dialoge in posvetovanja voditi na način, s katerim se zagotovi uspešno izpolnjevanje teh ciljev;
Believes that specific objectives need to be laid down for each dialogue and consultation, using all the documents drawn up by the Council, the Member States, the Commission and Parliament, and reports from international and local human rights organisations, to identify the objectives of a human rights dialogue or consultation with a third country, and calls for the best courses of action to obtain concrete results to be analysed; believes that dialogues and consultations should be conducted in such a way as to ensure that those objectives are effectively met;
vztraja, da bi morali cilji dialoga in posvetovanj temeljiti na načelu, da so človekove pravice univerzalne, nedeljive in medsebojno odvisne, ter priporoča, da bi morala merila, ki bodo vzpostavljena, poleg državljanskih in političnih pravic zajemati tudi gospodarske, socialne, okoljske in kulturne pravice;
Maintains that dialogue and consultation objectives should be based on the principle that human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent, and recommends that the criteria to be established should encompass not only civil and political rights but also economic, social, environmental and cultural rights;
poudarja potrebo po tem, da se delegacija trojke EU, ki vključuje strokovnjake na visoki ravni, pošlje v zadevno državo, da poskuša začeti dialog in posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah, sledi pa naj ji predstavitev poročila delegacije delovni skupini Sveta za človekove pravice in Parlamentu;
Stresses the need to send a delegation of the EU Troika, comprising high-level experts, to a country under consideration with a view to the possible initiation of a human rights dialogue and consultation, to be followed by a presentation of the delegation's report to COHOM and to Parliament;
poziva Svet, naj postavi jasna merila za začetek, prekinitev ali končanje dialoga ali posvetovanj, naj opravi presojo vpliva preden predloži razloge za njihov začetek ali končanje (pri tem naj obravnava pričakovano obdobje in ukrepe, ki jih je treba sprejeti za ponovni začetek dialoga ali posvetovanj), ter naj zagotovi, da si delegacija zadevne države ne ustvari mnenja, da EU razume dialog ali posvetovanja kot namenjena samim sebi, ki jih je treba ohranjati za vsako ceno;
Calls on the Council to set clear criteria for the initiation, suspension or termination of a dialogue or consultation, to conduct an impact assessment before giving the reasons for its initiation or suspension (dealing with its expected period and the steps to be taken in order to restart the dialogue and consultation) and to make sure that the delegation of the country in question does not perceive the EU as viewing the dialogue or consultation as an end in itself that must be maintained at all costs;
poziva Svet, naj v primerih, ko tretja država zavrne začetek ali nadaljevanje dialoga ali posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah, obravnava posebne ukrepe v zvezi s človekovimi pravicami in demokratizacijo, zlasti s podporo civilni družbi;
Calls on the Council, in cases where a third country rejects the initiation or continuation of a human rights dialogue or consultation, to consider specific action with regard to human rights and democratisation, in particular through support to civil society;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v korist vseh zainteresiranih strani, zlasti Parlamenta in nevladnih organizacij, dovolj zgodaj objavita dnevni red dialogov in posvetovanj, s čimer zagotovita, da lahko k tem prispevajo;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to publish dialogue and consultation agendas sufficiently in advance for the benefit of all interested stakeholders, especially for Parliament and NGOs, so as to ensure that they are able to make a contribution;
meni, da mora biti izbor tem za dnevni red dialogov in posvetovanj zaradi večje učinkovitosti jasnejši in usmerjen v vsebino, v opredeljevanje teh tem pa morata biti vključeni obe strani; opozarja Komisijo in Svet, da razvoj dialogov in posvetovanj temelji na vzajemnosti in je v okviru medsebojnega spoštovanja;
Believes that, in the interests of effectiveness, the selection of dialogue and consultation topics on the agenda should be more clear-cut and substance-oriented, involving both sides in their formulation; reminds the Commission and the Council that the development of the dialogues and consultations is based on reciprocity and within the framework of mutual respect;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj izvajata pritisk na oblasti tretjih držav, da bi dovolile udeležbo predstavnikom ministrstev in drugih javnih institucij, ki jih zadevajo teme, izbrane za dnevni red dialoga ali posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah;
Urges the Council and the Commission to press third-country authorities to allow the participation of representatives of the ministries and other public institutions concerned by the topics selected for the agenda of the human rights dialogue or consultation;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju s Parlamentom in nevladnimi organizacijami oblikujeta kazalnike za vsak zadani cilj/merilo uspešnosti; meni, da morajo biti ti kazalniki realistični in osredotočeni na doseganje praktičnih rezultatov, ki bi se lahko podpirali na podlagi drugih orodij zunanje politike EU; je trdno prepričan, da je treba priznati potrebo po dolgoročnem ocenjevanju rezultatov dialogov in posvetovanj;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, with the involvement of Parliament and NGOs, to draw up indicators for each given objective/benchmark; considers that such indicators must be realistic and aimed at achieving practical results that could be supported through other EU foreign policy tools; strongly believes that it is important to recognise that results of dialogues and consultations should be evaluated in the long term;
upošteva prizadevanje Sveta za uskladitev interesnih področij, ki so ključna za dialoge in posvetovanja EU o človekovih pravicah, da se lahko ta interesna področja uporabijo kot podlaga za določitev meril uspešnosti za merjenje napredka, s ciljem povečanja skladnosti in doslednosti med dialogi in posvetovanji o človekovih pravicah ter vsemi instrumenti politike EU o človekovih pravicah;
Takes note of the efforts made by the Council to harmonise key areas of concern regarding EU human rights dialogues and consultations so that those areas of concern may be used as a basis for setting up benchmarks to measure progress, with the aim of enhancing coherence and consistency between human rights dialogues and consultations and all instruments of EU human rights policy;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj objavita cilje in merila uspešnosti, določene v dialogih in posvetovanjih, da jih bodo lahko analizirale tako institucije, ki so organizirale dialoge in posvetovanja, kot tudi akterji – bodisi institucionalni bodisi nevladni –, ki se teh niso udeležili, s čimer s zagotovi, da EU postane javno odgovorna za rezultate in razvoj dialogov in posvetovanj;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to publish the objectives and benchmarks laid down in the dialogues and consultations, in order to enable them to be analysed not just by the institutions organising the dialogue and consultation but also by actors – whether institutional or non-governmental – not taking part, thus ensuring that the EU can be made publicly accountable for the outcome of, and developments in, the dialogues and consultations;
poudarja potrebo po vzpostavitvi učinkovitih mehanizmov za nadgradnjo, s katerimi se obravnavajo vprašanja, ki so bila odprta v dialogih in posvetovanjih ter v končnih priporočilih; poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj izkoristita rezultate dialogov in posvetovanj z oblikovanjem in izvajanjem programov in projektov, oblikovanih za izboljšanje položaja človekovih pravic na terenu;
Stresses the need to establish effective follow-up mechanisms to deal with the points raised in the dialogues and consultations and in the final recommendations; calls on the Council and the Commission to follow up the outcome of the dialogues and consultations by devising and implementing programmes and projects designed to improve the human rights situation on the ground;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj objavita sklepe vsakega dialoga in posvetovanj ali v vsakem primeru njihove povzetke, če je treba zaradi učinkovitosti nekatere postopke obravnavati kot zaupne;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to publish the conclusions of each dialogue and consultation, or at any rate a summary thereof if certain procedures have to be treated as confidential in the interests of effectiveness;
meni, da bi bilo treba skupna javna sporočila, ki veljajo za oba partnerja, objaviti po vsakem krogu dialoga ali posvetovanj, da se zagotovi večji učinek in poveča doslednost;
Believes that joint public communiqués, applying to both partners, should be issued after every round of dialogue or consultation in order to ensure that there is a greater impact and increased coherence;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj povečata preglednost in prepoznavnost sporočil EU na področju ukrepov za človekove pravice in jih s tem izboljšata ter v zvezi s tem povečata obseg informacij o delu delovne skupine o človekovih pravicah pri Svetu, ki so na voljo na spletni strani Evropske unije;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to increase the transparency and visibility of, and thus to improve, the EU's communications in the field of human rights actions, and in this regard to broaden the scope of the information on COHOM's work that can be accessed via the European Union's website;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zagotovita dejavno sodelovanje civilne družbe na različnih stopnjah, ki vključuje pripravo, nadaljnje spremljanje ter oceno dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah; v zvezi s tem podpira odločitev Sveta o vključitvi zagovornikov človekovih pravic v pripravo srečanj za dialoge in posvetovanja ter o upoštevanju mnenj lokalnih zagovornikov človekovih pravic in nevladnih organizacij pri določanju prednostnih nalog na področju človekovih pravic v zvezi s političnimi dialogi in posvetovanji; priporoča, da je treba strokovne seminarje, ki se uporabljajo za strukturirane dialoge in posvetovanja, organizirati tudi za druge oblike in vrste dialogov in posvetovanj;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to ensure the active participation of civil society in the various phases involved in preparing, following up and assessing the human rights dialogues and consultations; supports, in this respect, the decision of the Council to involve human rights defenders in the preparation of dialogue and consultation meetings and to consult local human rights defenders and NGOs when establishing human rights priorities in the context of political dialogues and consultations; recommends that experts" seminars, an arrangement employed for structured dialogues and consultations, should likewise be organised for other forms and types of dialogue and consultation;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj spodbujata sodelovanje zagovornikov človekovih pravic v zadevni državi, ki so vključeni v dialog ali posvetovanja o človekovih pravicah, da jim omogoči sodelovanje in vpliv v postopku, pri uporabi smernic Sveta in ob upoštevanju kampanje za spodbujanje žensk, ki zagovarjajo človekove pravice;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to promote cooperation by the human rights defenders of the country concerned by the human rights dialogue or consultations, in order to allow them a place and a voice in the procedure, in application of the Council guidelines and following the campaign to promote women who defend human rights;
poudarja, da sodelujočih nevladnih organizacij zaradi zagotavljanja svobode govora ne smejo izbrati organi zadevne države;
Stresses that, in order to guarantee their freedom of expression, participating NGOs should not be chosen by the authorities of the country concerned;
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi evropskega instrumenta za demokracijo in človekove pravice zagotovi financiranje stroškov predstavnikov civilne družbe na strokovnih seminarjih, vključno z nevladnimi organizacijami;
Calls on the Commission to provide, within the framework of the EIDHR, for the financing of the costs of participants from civil society, including NGOs, in experts" seminars;
Okrepitev vloge Evropskega parlamenta
Enhancing the role of the European Parliament
poziva Svet, naj vzdržuje ter posreduje Parlamentu in njegovemu pristojnemu odboru zbirke podatkov o človekovih pravicah, ki se nanašajo na tretje države, pa tudi dveletne ocene vsakega dialoga in posvetovanja; poziva Svet, naj vsako ocenjevanje pojasni, tako da razloži uporabo meril uspešnosti, določi časovne roke za njihovo uresničitev in namesto posameznih rezultatov poudari trende; poudarja, da bi bilo treba te informacije, v primeru, ko vsebujejo zaupno gradivo, posredovati Parlamentu v skladu s sistemom iz odstavka 26 te resolucije;
Calls on the Council to conduct and forward to Parliament and its competent committee the human rights fact sheets regarding third countries, as well as bi-annual assessments of each dialogue and consultation; calls on the Council to clarify the evaluation by explaining how the benchmarks are to be applied, setting time limits for attaining them and placing the emphasis on trends rather than on isolated results; stresses that, should this information include confidential material, it should be forwarded to Parliament in accordance with the system described in paragraph 26 of this resolution;
poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu posreduje občasne ocene položaja človekovih pravic v tretjih državah ter redne informacije o položaju v zvezi s političnimi dialogi in posvetovanji o človekovih pravicah s tretjimi državami ali regijami, vključno z njihovim časovnim razporedom in vprašanji, ki so bila postavljena na pogajanjih, ter soglaša, da je treba v primeru, ko te informacije vključujejo zaupno gradivo, te posredovati Parlamentu v skladu s sistemom iz odstavka 26 te resolucije;
Calls on the Commission to forward to Parliament periodic assessments of the human rights situation in respect of third countries and regular information on the situation regarding political dialogues and consultations on human rights with third countries or regions, including their timetable and the points raised in the negotiations, and agrees that, if this information includes confidential material, it should be forwarded to Parliament in accordance with the system described in paragraph 26 of this resolution;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj se po vsakem krogu dialoga ali posvetovanj srečata in posvetujeta s Parlamentom in poročata poslancem Parlamenta, ter ponavlja poziv, da se Parlament vključi v odločanje o nadaljevanju ali prekinitvi dialoga in posvetovanj;
Calls on the Council and the Commission, as a matter of course whenever a round of dialogue or consultation has taken place, to hold a consultation session and a debriefing with Members of Parliament, and repeats its call for Parliament to be involved in decisions to continue or suspend a dialogue and consultation;
poudarja potrebo po vključitvi Parlamenta v odločanje o tem, ali naj se začne nov dialog in posvetovanje, in da se mu zagotovi vse za to potrebne informacije; poziva k upoštevanju njegovega mnenja v zvezi z mandati, cilji, obliko, postopki itd. načrtovanih dialogov in posvetovanj;
Points to the need for Parliament to be involved in the decision to start a new dialogue and consultation and to be provided with all the information required for that purpose; calls for its opinion to be taken into account as regards the mandate, objectives, format, procedures, etc. of the projected dialogue and consultation;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj omogočita poslancem Parlamenta udeležbo na strokovnih seminarjih v zvezi s strukturiranimi dialogi in posvetovanji;
Urges the Council and the Commission to allow Members of Parliament to attend the experts" seminars held in connection with structured dialogues and consultations;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj uporabita svoj vpliv za zagotovitev sodelovanja poslancev nacionalnega parlamenta zadevne tretje države v uradnem dialogu ali posvetovanjih; meni, da bi to povečalo legitimnost dialoga ali posvetovanj kot takšnih ter omogočilo poslancem Parlamenta, da se ga udeležijo z večjo pripravljenostjo;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to use their influence to ensure that members of the national parliament of the third country concerned are involved in the official dialogue or consultation; believes that this would confer greater legitimacy on the dialogue or consultation as such and enable Members of Parliament to take part in it more readily;
meni, da je bistvenega pomena povečati vlogo medparlamentarnih skupščin in medparlamentarnih delegacij v dialogih in posvetovanjih o človekovih pravicah;
Considers it essential to increase the role of interparliamentary assemblies and interparliamentary delegations in the human rights dialogues and consultations;
Delovanje različnih oblik dialogov in posvetovanj o človekovih pravicah
Functioning of the various forms of human rights dialogues and consultations
Strukturiran dialog s Kitajsko:
Structured dialogue with China
poudarja potrebo po tem, da se dialog o človekovih pravicah med EU in Kitajsko znatno okrepi in izboljša; poudarja, da je spoštovanje človekovih pravic na Kitajskem še vedno zelo skrb zbujajoče;
Emphasises the need to considerably strengthen and improve the EU-China human rights dialogue; stresses that China's human rights record remains a matter of serious concern;