natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS HENRIKA OTBOJA
ANNEX 1: CURRICULUM VITÆ OF Henrik Otbo
PRILOGA 2: ODGOVORI HENRIKA OTBOJA NA VPRAŠALNIK
ANNEX 2: answers BY henrik otbo to the questionnaire
– ob upoštevanju člena 286(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, v skladu s katerim se je posvetoval s Svetom ( C7-0345/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C7-0345/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju dejstva, da se je Odboru za proračunski nadzor na seji dne 23. novembra 2011 predstavil kandidat, ki ga Svet predlaga za člana Računskega sodišča,
– having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A7-0416/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A7-0416/2011 ),
A. ker Henrik Otbo izpolnjuje pogoje, ki jih določa člen 286(1) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
A. whereas Henrik Otbo fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,
PRILOGA 1: ŽIVLJENJEPIS HENRIKA OTBOJA
ANNEX 1 : CURRICULUM VITÆ OF Henrik Otbo
Ime: Henrik Otbo
Na me : Henrik Otbo
Datum in kraj rojstva: 14. november 1949 v Københavnu
Date and place of birth : 14 November 1949 in Copenhagen
Trenutni položaj: generalni državni revizor Danske
Current position : Auditor-General of Denmark
Izobrazba: magisterij iz ekonomije, 1976, Univerza v Københavnu
Education : Master’s degree in economics, 1976, University of Copenhagen
1995– : generalni državni revizor Danske
1995 - : Auditor-General of Denmark
1991–1995: predavatelj državljanske vzgoje, poslovna šola v Københavnu
1991-1995: Lecturer in civics, Copenhagen Business School
1989–1995: direktor danskega državnega urada za revizijo
1989-1995: Director, Danish National Audit Office
1988–1991: predavatelj teoretične statistike, poslovna šola v Københavnu
1988-1991: Lecturer in theoretical statistics, Copenhagen Business School
1988–1989: vodja oddelka na danskem državnem uradu za revizijo
1988-1989: Head of section, Danish National Audit Office
1985–1988: vodja kabineta danskega člana Evropskega računskega sodišča
1985-1988: Head of Private Office for the Danish Member of the European Court of Auditors
1984–1985: ataše danskega člana Evropskega računskega sodišča
1984-1985: Attaché to the Danish Member of the European Court of Auditors
1980–1983: predavatelj državljanske vzgoje, leta 1983 pa tudi teoretične statistike, poslovna šola v Københavnu
1980-1983: Lecturer in civics and also, in 1983, theoretical statistics, Copenhagen Business School
1976-1984: vodja oddelka na danskem državnem uradu za revizijo
1976-1984: Head of section, Danish National Audit Office
Od leta 2004 je predsednik odbora za poklicne standarde Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij (INTOSAI).
Chairman of the INTOSAI Professional Standards Committee (PSC) since 2004.
INTOSAI je mednarodna organizacija vrhovnih revizijskih institucij.
INTOSAI is the International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions.
Odbor za poklicne standarde Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij je zadolžen za oblikovanje poklicnih standardov revizije, ki jih uporabljajo vrhovne revizijske institucije.
The PSC is responsible for developing professional audit standards for use by supreme audit institutions.
Jeziki: danski, angleški, francoski in nemški.
Languages : Danish, English, French and German.
Navedite svoje najpomembnejše poklicne izkušnje s področja javnih financ, upravljanja ali revizije upravljanja.
Please highlight the main aspects of your professional experience in public finance, management or management auditing
Po izobrazbi sem magister ekonomije.
My educational background is a master degree in economics.
Rdeča nit moje poklicne poti je revizija javnih financ.
The red thread in my career is public audit.
Že v mladih letih sem se pridružil danskemu državnemu uradu za revizijo.
I joined the National Audit Office of Denmark in my young years.
Poleg tega sem vrsto let poučeval statistiko in državljansko vzgojo na københavnski poslovni šoli in na københavnski univerzi.
For many years during my career I also taught statistics and civics at Copenhagen Business School and at the University of Copenhagen.
Med letoma 1984 in 1988 sem imel to srečo, da so me napotili v Luksemburg, kjer sem delal v kabinetu danskega člana Evropskega računskega sodišča.
From 1984-1988, I had the fortune to be seconded to Luxembourg to work in the Cabinet of the Danish Member at the European Court of Auditors.
Tako sem se iz prve roke seznanil s sistemom EU.
Here I learned about the EU system from the inside.
Prav tako sem spoznal pomen mednarodnega sodelovanja.
I also experienced the importance of international cooperation.
Ko sem po vrnitvi postal direktor danskega državnega urada za revizijo, je bila ena od mojih glavnih nalog revizija finančnih sredstev EU.
When promoted as Director back in the National Audit Office of Denmark one of my main responsibilities was the audit of EU Funds.
Moja enota je pripravila več posebnih poročil o porabi finančnih sredstev EU na Danskem.
My unit did several special reports on the Danish spending of EU Funds.
Poleg tega sem bil imenovan za danskega uradnika za zvezo z EU in za mednarodno osebo za stike danskega državnega urada za revizijo z INTOSAI (Mednarodna organizacija vrhovnih revizijskih institucij) in EUROSAI (Evropsko združenje vrhovnih revizijskih institucij).
In addition, I was appointed as the Danish EU Liaison Officer and also as the Office’s international contact person for INTOSAI (International Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions) and EUROSAI (European Organisation of Supreme Audit Institutions).
Na teh položajih sem dobil pregled nad mednarodnim dogajanjem in navdih za revizijsko delo v danskem državnem uradu za revizijo.
These positions gave me both an international perspective and also inspiration to the audit work in the National Audit Office of Denmark.
Leta 1995 sem postal generalni državni revizor Danske in to funkcijo opravljam še sedaj.
I was appointed Auditor General of Denmark in 1995 and have held this position till now.
Kot generalni državni revizor sem poskrbel za strokovni napredek danskega državnega urada za revizijo.
As an Auditor General, I have ensured the professional development of the National Audit Office of Denmark.
V času mojega dela je urad za odbor za javne finance, danski parlament in upravo opravljal visokokakovostne, pravočasne in ustrezne revizije.
In my time, the Office has delivered timely and relevant audits of high quality to the Danish Public Accounts Committee, the Danish Parliament and to the administration.
Z vsemi zainteresiranimi stranmi urada sem vzpostavil dobre delovne odnose, ob tem pa ohranil neodvisnost.
I have established good working relations with all stakeholders of the Office while maintaining independence.
Danski državni urad za revizijo od leta 2004 predseduje odboru za strokovne standarde Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij.
Since 2004, the National Audit Office of Denmark has chaired INTOSAI’s Professional Standards Committee.
V odbor je včlanjenih 68 vrhovnih revizijskih institucij.
The Committee has 68 Supreme Audit Institutions as members.
Leta 2010 je ta odbor na kongresu Mednarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucij INCOSAI predložil celoten sklop strokovnih standardov, ki so jih dolžne izvajati vse vrhovne revizijske institucije.
In 2010 at INTOSAI’s Congress, INCOSAI, the Committee delivered a full set of professional standards for all Supreme Audit Institutions to implement.
Navedite tri najpomembnejše odločitve, pri katerih ste bili udeleženi v svoji karieri.
What are the three most important decisions to which you have been party in your professional life?
Na splošno sem si na položaju danskega generalnega državnega revizorja prizadeval za to, da bi s predložitvijo dobrih revizijskih rezultatov prispeval k razvoju danske družbe.
Overall, in my years as the Danish Auditor General I have worked to contribute to the development of the Danish society by delivering sound audit results.
Glede na to, da ima urad za revizijo medsektorski dostop, se mi je zdelo pomembno ta dostop uporabiti za zagotavljanje preglednosti in odgovornosti ter spodbujanje najboljše prakse po celotni upravi.
As the Audit Office has a cross-sectorial access it has also been important to me to use this access to ensure transparency and accountability – and to promote best practice – across the administration.
Pri pripravljanju pravih revizij ob pravem času sem svojo pozornost usmerjal v odločitve na naslednjih treh glavnih področjih:
My focus on delivering the right audit at the right time involved decisions in three main areas:
Poglobitev dialoga :
Enhancing the dialogue :
· z danskim odborom za javne finance, da bi zagotovil, da danski državni urad za revizijo izpolnjuje zahteve in pričakovanja odbora za javne finance in zagotavlja visokokakovostne revizije.
· with the Danish Public Accounts Committee to ensure that the National Audit Office of Denmark is meeting the requirements and expectations of the Public Accounts Committee and providing high quality audits.
V praski je to pomenilo, da sem za odbor za javne finance organiziral letne obiske, ga seznanjal z načrti revizij in izdajal obvestila o potekajočih revizijah.
I have done this e.g. by arranging annual visits for the PAC to the Office, by sharing the audit planning and by issuing memos on on-going audits.
· z upravo, in sicer z izmenjavo znanja in ocen tveganja ter z dajanjem predlogov za zagotavljanje, da revizije upravi prinesejo dodano vrednost.
· with the administration by sharing knowledge, sharing risk assessments and by providing recommendations to ensure that the audits add value to the administration.
Tako je državni urad za revizijo na primer organiziral državne konference o reviziji javnih financ.
One example might be that the National Audit Office has arranged national conferences on public audit.
Tema zadnje konference, ki je potekala oktobra letos, je bila, kako lahko revizija javnih financ prinese dodano vrednost.
The theme of last conference held this October was how public audit adds value.
Razvoj znanja in revizijskih standardov za revizorje javnih financ – na državni in mednarodni ravni.
Developing competencies and audit standards for public auditors – both on a national and international level.
Danski državni urad za revizijo je s preostalimi revizorji javnih financ oblikoval sistem za certificiranje revizorjev javnih financ.
The National Audit Office of Denmark has together with other public auditors established a certification scheme for public auditors.
Ta sistem tvori skupni okvir za vse revizorje javnih financ in je osnova za visokokakovostne revizije.
This scheme forms a common framework for all public auditors and gives the foundation for high quality audits.
Poleg tega naj ponovno omenim predsedovanje odboru za strokovne standarde organizacije INTOSAI.
I would also again mention the chairing of INTOSAI’s Professional Standards Committee.
S tem so vse članice organizacije INTOSAI dobile celoten sklop strokovnih standardov posebej za revizorje javnih financ.
This work has given all the Members of INTOSAI a full set of professional standards especially for public auditors.
V letih 1999, 2001 in 2009 so bile opravljene ankete o zadovoljstvu strank z delom danskega državnega urada za revizijo , leta 2006 pa je bil opravljen medsebojni strokovni pregled, da bi zagotovili, da urad pripravlja ustrezne revizije.
Exposing the National Audit Office of Denmark to client surveys in 1999, 2001 and 2009 and to a peer review in 2006 to make sure that the National Audit Office of Denmark delivers relevant audits.
Kako bi to delovali v skladu s to obveznostjo pri opravljanju svojih prihodnjih nalog?
How would you apply this obligation to your prospective duties?
Pravila o neodvisnosti iz Pogodbe so podobna tistim, ki so veljala za moj položaj danskega generalnega državnega revizorja, zato sem jih navajen izpolnjevati.
The Treaty’s rules on independence are similar to those of my position as Auditor General of Denmark so I am accustomed to applying such rules.
Prvič, na Danskem ima le danski odbor za javne finance pravico od generalnega državnega revizorja zahtevati izvedbo revizij.
Firstly, in Denmark, only the Danish Public Accounts Committee has a right to ask the Auditor General to perform audits.
Vendar sem v 16 letih izkušenj spoznal, da imajo tudi mnoge druge zainteresirane strani dobre zamisli glede načrtov dela urada za revizijo.
However, it has been my experience during my 16 years of service that many other stakeholders have good ideas on the work plans of the audit office.
Drugič, mediji se vse bolj zanimajo za revizijsko delo.
Secondly, media takes a growing interest in the audit work.
Vložiti je bilo treba veliko truda, da smo dosegli ravnovesje med odprtostjo do tiska in hkratnim zagotavljanjem nemotenega dela revizorjev.
It has been quite an act of balance to be open to the press but at the same time to make sure that auditors can work undisturbed.
Tretjič, po mojih izkušnjah lahko temeljne revizije smotrnosti poslovanja, povezane z najpomembnejšimi vprašanji, vodijo v težke razprave z zadevnimi institucijami in do njihovih bistvenih odgovorov.
Thirdly, it is my experience that critical performance audits on core issues may result in tough discussions with and critical answers from the institutions involved.
Menim, da so vsa tri vprašanja večna in da treba najti pravo ravnovesje v vsakem primeru posebej.
I think that these three dilemmas are here to stay and it is important to find the right balance in each situation.
Da bi ohranil popolno neodvisnost seveda ne bom prosil za navodila niti jih ne bom sprejemal od tretjih strani, bodisi vlade bodisi katerega koli drugega organa.
Naturally to ensure complete independency, I will therefore not seek or take instructions from third parties, be it government or any other body.
Z revizijskimi dokumenti bom delal strokovno v skladu z mednarodnimi revizijskimi standardi.
I will deal with audit files in a professional manner in accordance with international auditing standards.
Poleg tega bom spoštoval določbe Pogodbe, poslovnika Računskega sodišča, njegovega kodeksa ravnanja in etičnih smernic.
In addition, I will follow the provisions of the Treaty and the Court’s rules of procedure, code of conduct and ethical guidelines.
Vendar pa neodvisnost ne pomeni, da se ne bom pogovarjal z zadevnimi zainteresiranimi stranmi Računskega sodišča.
However, being independent will not prevent me from engaging in dialogues with relevant stakeholders of the Court.
Računsko sodišče ima pomembno vlogo pri zagotavljanju ustreznih revizijskih rezultatov in pri tem, da se o njih jasno poroča.
The Court has an important role to play in providing relevant audit results and to communicate these in a clear manner.
Ali ste dobili razrešnico za naloge upravljanja, ki ste jih predhodno opravljali, če se takšen postopek uporablja?
Have you received a discharge for the management duties you carried out previously, if such a procedure applies?
Takšen postopek se na Danskem ne uporablja.
Such a procedure does not apply in Denmark.
Ali imate poslovne interese oziroma kakšne druge obveznosti, ki bi lahko bile v nasprotju z vašimi poklicnimi dolžnostmi?
Do you have any business holdings or any other commitments, which might conflict with your professional duties?
Če ste trenutno udeleženi v kakršnem koli sodnem postopku, ga lahko, prosim opišete?
In case you are involved in any current legal proceedings, would you please give details?
Poslovnih interesov, ki bi lahko bili v nasprotju z mojimi poklicnimi dolžnostmi, nimam.
I do not have any business holdings which might conflict with my professional duties.
Predsednika Računskega sodišča sem v celoti pripravljen seznaniti s svojimi finančnimi interesi in drugimi obveznostmi ter podatke dati na voljo javnosti.
I am fully prepared to disclose my financial interests and other commitments to the President of the Court and to make them public.
Nimam nobene izvoljene funkcije niti aktivne funkcije z obveznostmi v politični stranki.
I do not hold any elected office or any active function with responsibilities in a political party.
Kako bi obravnavali primer večje nepravilnosti ali celo goljufije in/ali korupcije, v katerem bi bili udeleženi državljani vaše države članice?
How would you deal with a major irregularity or even fraud and/or corruption case involving actors in the Member State of your origin?
Tak primer bi obravnaval skladno s postopki Računskega sodišča, ki veljajo v takih primerih.
I would deal with such cases by applying the Court’s procedures governing that type of case.
Tako bi poskrbel za to, da se taki primeri obravnavajo enako in pravilno, ne glede na državo izvora akterjev.
This would ensure that such cases were treated equally and correctly irrespective of the origin of the actors.
V primeru suma ali znakov goljufije in/ali korupcije se zadeva nujno izroči uradu OLAF.
Handing over the case to OLAF is mandatory if fraud and/or corruption is suspected or indicated.
Na Danskem sem obravnaval le malo primerov goljufije.
I have only dealt with a limited number of cases of fraud in Denmark.
Vendar pa je urad za revizijo vsak posamezen primer vzel zelo resno in tesno sodeloval z udeleženimi organi.
But in each and every case the Audit Office has taken it very seriously and has worked closely with the authorities involved.
Zame je najpomembneje, da delo Računskega sodišča prispeva k pregledni in odgovorni Evropski uniji.
To me it is of utmost importance that the work of the Court contributes to a transparent and accountable European Union.
Računsko sodišče s tesnim sodelovanjem z uradom OLAF pri preprečevanju nepravilnosti in goljufij prispeva k osredotočenosti na dobro finančno poslovodenje finančnih sredstev EU.
By working closely together with OLAF on prevention of irregularity and fraud the Court helps to focus on sound financial management of EU Funds.
Dobro finančno poslovodenje temelji na načelih gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
Sound financial management is built around the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
To pomeni, da si morajo institucije zastaviti cilje, uporabljati ustrezne kazalnike uspešnosti in vzpostaviti ustrezne sisteme notranje kontrole in revizije, da bi zagotovile visoko stopnjo uspešnosti in skladnosti.
This means that the institutions need to set objectives, use relevant performance indicators and establish adequate internal control and audit systems to ensure a high degree of accomplishment and compliance.
Za dobro kulturo finančnega poslovodenja je nujno, da se najvišje vodstvo usmerja na upravljanje in spremljanje ciljev.
Top management’s focus on managing and following up on the targets is essential for a sound financial management culture.
Institucije, v katerih vlada kultura dobrega finančnega poslovodenja, štejejo za odgovorne in pregledne ter svojim "lastnikom" in evropski javnosti na splošno jasno izkazujejo svojo učinkovitost.
Institutions with a sound financial management culture are seen to be accountable and transparent, clearly demonstrating their effectiveness to their ‘owners’ and to the European public in general.
Nadzor Parlamenta nad tem, kako Komisija izvršuje proračun, je bistvenega pomena.
The Parliament’s oversight of the Commission’s implementation of the budget is essential.
Državljanom Unije zagotavlja, da se njihov denar troši modro, v prave namene, zakonito, skladno s predpisi in čim bolj učinkovito.
It provides assurance to the citizens of the Union that the money they provide is spent wisely, on the purposes intended, legally and in accordance with the rules and as effective as possible.
Po mojem mnenju ta proces krepi demokratični dialog, dolgoročno pa prispeva tudi h krepitvi zaupanja državljanov in posledično večji koheziji v Uniji.
This process, in my view, strengthens the democratic dialogue and also in the long term contributes to increasing the citizens’ trust and thereby more cohesion in the Union.
Pri tem ima Računsko sodišče pomembno vlogo, saj je eden od glavnih virov informacij o tem, kako se izpolnjujejo namere proračunskega organa.
The Court has an important role to play in this, being one of the main providers of information on how the intentions of the budgetary authorities are carried out.
Te informacije so objavljene v letnem poročilu, ki obravnava predvsem revizijo računovodskih izkazov in revizijo skladnosti, in v posebnih poročilih, ki obravnavajo predvsem revizijo smotrnosti poslovanja.
This information is communicated in the Annual Report, which is dealing mainly with financial and compliance audit and in the Special Reports that are dealing primarily with performance audits.
Naloge Računskega sodišča pa niso omejene na pošiljanje poročil Parlamentu, saj je dolžno pomagati Odboru za proračunski nadzor, kadar koli je to mogoče.
The Court’s responsibility, however, stretches beyond sending the reports to the Parliament, as it has a duty to assist the Committee on Budgetary Control whenever it is possible.
Menim, da je Parlament, zlasti Odbor za proračunski nadzor, glavna stranka Računskega sodišča, in da morata zato Odbor za proračunski nadzor in Računsko sodišče tesno sodelovati, da bi bil nadzor Parlamenta nad finančnimi sredstvi EU čim bolj učinkovit.
I believe that the Parliament and in particular the Committee on Budgetary Control is the Court’s primary client and that the relationship between the Committee on Budgetary Control and the Court therefore needs to be close to make the Parliament’s oversight of EU finances as effective as possible.
Računsko sodišče in Odbor za proračunski nadzor morata ohranjati neprekinjen in učinkovit dialog, Računsko sodišče pa mora upoštevati želje in pričakovanja Parlamenta, pri tem pa zagotavljati lastno neodvisnost.
The Court and the Committee on Budgetary Control need to have a continuous and effective dialogue and the Court needs to be attentive to the Parliament’s wishes and expectations while ensuring its own independence.
Prepričan sem da bi morali revizija računovodskih izkazov in revizija smotrnosti poslovanja upravljanju dati dodano vrednost.
It is my conviction that both financial audit and performance audit should add value to the administration.
Vendar pa si revizija smotrnosti poslovanja prizadeva za zagotavljanje cenovne primernosti in mora v okviru EU izboljšati finančno poslovodenje EU.
However, performance audit aims at ensuring value for money and should in the EU context improve the financial management of the EU.
Revizija smotrnosti poslovanja mora zagotoviti, da se proračun izvršuje skladno z načeli gospodarnosti, učinkovitosti in uspešnosti.
Performance audit should ensure that the budget is implemented in line with the principles of economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
Pravilna poraba finančnih sredstev EU je pomembna za vse državljane EU, zato ima Računsko sodišče pomembno vlogo pri opravljanju ustreznih revizij smotrnosti poslovanja glede finančnih sredstev EU.
Proper use of EU funds is of importance to all EU citizens and therefore the Court has an important role to play in delivering relevant performance audits of EU funds.
Z opravljanjem pravočasnih in ustreznih visokokakovostnih revizij smotrnosti poslovanja se Računsko sodišče osredotoča na dobro finančno poslovodenje finančnih sredstev EU.
By delivering timely and relevant high quality performance audits, the Court focuses on sound financial management of EU funds.
Seveda je cilj teh revizij doseganje boljših rezultatov z istimi stroški.
Getting better results for the money is of course the aim of such audits.
Žal nimajo vse dejavnosti Unije ustreznih ciljev in potrebnih kazalnikov, ki bi Računskemu sodišču omogočili revizijo dosežene uspešnosti.
Unfortunately, not all activities of the Union have adequate goals and the requisite indicators that would enable the Court to audit the effectiveness achieved.