natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
4. poziva Komisijo, naj se pri pripravi letnega poročila o izvajanju Listine EU o temeljnih pravicah ne osredotoča le na izvajanje Listine, ampak tudi na uporabo vseh členov Pogodbe EU v zvezi s temeljnimi pravicami in na položaj temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji; poziva Komisijo, naj v to poročilo vključi podrobnejše informacije o tem, kako države članice Listino izvajajo pri uveljavljanju evropskega prava, ter o vprašanjih, ki so jih zastavili državljani, o njihovem reševanju in o tem, katere konkretne nadaljnje ukrepe je sprejela;
Calls on the Commission, when preparing its annual report on the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, to focus not only on the application of the Charter, but also on all EU Treaty articles relating to fundamental rights and on the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union; calls on the Commission to include in that report more detailed information on the implementation of the Charter by Member States when applying European law and on the issues raised with it by citizens, how it dealt with them and what concrete follow-up measures it took;
43). , ene najpomembnejših pravic, ki jih uživajo državljani EU, povečajo preglednost in zagotovijo enostaven in uporabniku prijazen in celosten dostop do dokumentov in informacij – vključno z zagotavljanjem tehnologij brez ovir –, da bi lahko državljani še tesneje sodelovali v procesu sprejemanja odločitev; v zvezi s tem opozarja na osrednji pomen dela evropskega varuha človekovih pravic pri uveljavljanju pravice dostopa do dokumentov institucij Unije;
43. – an important right enjoyed by EU citizens – is guaranteed by improving transparency and making access to documents and information easy, user-friendly and comprehensible, including through the provision of barrier-free technologies, so as to enable citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process; points in this context to the central importance of the work of the European Ombudsman in upholding the right of access to Union institutions’ documents;
11. države članice, ki so se v skladu s pristopno pogodbo za Romunijo in Bolgarijo odločile za sedemletni moratorij, do 1. januarja 2014, opozarja na pravico do prostega gibanja znotraj EU za delavce iz teh dveh držav, oziroma, če so se odločile, da bodo še naprej uporabljale prehodne ureditve, ki romunskim in bolgarskim državljanom omejujejo dostop do njihovih trgov dela
Calls on those Member States which have decided, under the EU Accession Treaty for Romania and Bulgaria, to introduce a seven-year moratorium, until 1 January 2014, on the right to free movement within the EU for workers from those two countries, or to continue applying transitional arrangements restricting access by Romanian and Bulgarian nationals to their labour markets
Glej med drugim peticiji 0810/2011 in 0900/2011. , jih poziva, naj svoje odločitve ponovno pretehtajo v najkrajšem možnem času, pri tem pa upoštevajo načelo enakosti, prepoved diskriminacije, neupravičenost teh odločitev in načelo solidarnosti, da pravice iz državljanstva EU na področju zaposlovanja za romunske in bolgarske državljane ne bodo več dolgo omejene;
See, inter alia, Petitions 0810/2011 and 0900/2011. , to review their decisions as soon as possible, taking into consideration the principle of equality, the prohibition of discrimination, the unjustified nature of those decisions and the principle of solidarity, so that the employment rights associated with EU citizenship are no longer restricted for Romanian and Bulgarian citizens;
Glej med drugim peticijo 0632/2008. ter naj nanje odgovarja bolj natančno; poudarja, da je treba za te listin čim prej zagotoviti vzajemno priznavanje in njihov prost pretok, brez diskriminacije, v skladu s členom 21 Listine o temeljnih pravicah;
See, inter alia , Petition 0632/2008. ; highlights the importance of making progress as quickly as possible towards mutual recognition and ensuring the free circulation of civil-status documents, without discrimination, in the light of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
14. poziva države članice, naj odpravijo politike in razveljavijo zakone, ki neposredno ali posredno diskriminirajo Rome in druge manjšine na podlagi rase in etnične pripadnosti, ter jih poziva, naj ustavijo vse primere preganjanja, izseljevanja in izganjanja ali zaplembe premoženja manjšinskih skupin; poziva vse države članice in EU, naj prevzamejo skupno odgovornost za spodbujanje in pospeševanje vključevanja romskih skupnosti in jim v skladu z resolucijo Evropskega parlamenta z dne 9. marca 2011 o strategiji EU o vključevanju Romov
Urges Member States to abolish policies and to annul and repeal laws that discriminate, either directly or indirectly, against the Roma and other minority groups on the grounds of race and ethnicity, and calls on them to stop all instances of persecution, eviction and expulsion, or of confiscation of the assets of any minority group; calls on all Member States and the EU to take joint responsibility for promoting and facilitating the integration of Roma communities, giving them the same rights and obligations as other EU citizens, in line with Parliament’s resolution of 9 March 2011 on the EU strategy on Roma inclusion
15. poziva Komisijo, naj prednostne naloge v zvezi s socialnim vključevanjem poveže v jasen niz ciljev, ki bodo vključevali varstvo državljanov pred diskriminacijo na vseh področjih življenja in spodbujanje socialnega dialoga med Romi in Neromi, da bi odpravili rasizem in ksenofobijo; poziva Komisijo, naj kot varuhinja Pogodb zagotovi celovito izvajanje ustrezne zakonodaje in nalaganje ustreznih sankcij za rasno motivirana kazniva dejanja
Calls on the Commission to link social inclusion priorities to a clear set of objectives that include protection of citizens against discrimination in all areas of life and the promotion of social dialogue between Roma and non-Roma people in order to combat racism and xenophobia; calls on the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, to ensure that the relevant legislation is implemented in full and that appropriate penalties are imposed for racially motivated crimes
Glej med drugim peticije 1351/2008, 0945/2010 in 1300/2010. ;
See, inter alia, Petitions 1351/2008, 0945/2010 and 1300/2010. ;
P7_TA(2011)0453 . storiti čim hitreje; v zvezi s tem prav tako opozarja na nesorazmerno veliko število starejših z omejeno mobilnostjo; poziva k pripravi programa, kakršen je Erasmus, za invalide;
P7_TA(2011)0453 . ; also draws attention to the disproportionately high number of older people with restricted mobility; calls for the establishment of an Erasmus-type programme for people with disabilities;
20. priznava, da sta največji oviri za to, da bi državljani izkoristili priložnosti ob številnejših izdelkih po konkurenčnih cenah, ki so na voljo na enotnem trgu, slabo poznavanje pravic potrošnikov v drugih državah EU in pomanjkljiva obveščenost potrošnikov o spletnih nakupih v drugih državah članicah; meni, da so informacije za potrošnike včasih zapletene in da je potrebna poenostavitev, na primer pri oznakah;
Notes that the greatest obstacles preventing citizens from benefiting from the larger product range and competitive prices available in the single market are a lack of knowledge of consumer rights in other EU countries and a lack of information for consumers making online purchases in other Member States; believes that information intended for consumers is sometimes complex and that simplification is required, for example in labelling;
22. meni, da je treba še olajšati dostop državljanov EU do bančnih storitev v drugi državi članici; poziva Komisijo, naj z ustreznimi zakonodajnimi ukrepi zagotovi dostop vseh državljanov EU do osnovnega plačilnega računa; poudarja, da je treba povečati preglednost bančnih provizij;
Takes the view that access to banking services for EU citizens who establish themselves in another Member State should be further facilitated; urges the Commission to take the necessary legislative measures to ensure access for all EU citizens to a basic payment account; stresses the need to improve the transparency of banking fees;
24. obsoja prakso vezane prodaje; želi, da bi na evropsko leto državljanov gledali kot na priložnost, da državljane opozorimo na ukrepe, ki jih ščitijo kot potrošnike in s pomočjo katerih so v obdobju krize ohranili kupno moč;
Condemns tie-in sales practices; calls for the European Year of Citizens to be used as an opportunity to draw citizens’ attention to the measures that have protected them as consumers and helped to maintain their purchasing power in times of crisis;
Glej med drugim peticiji 0401/2009 in 1119/2009. ; namenja posebno pozornost dejstvu, da takšna zahteva pomeni neposredno diskriminacijo na podlagi državljanstva, kar je v nasprotju s členom 4 Uredbe št. 883/2004; poziva Združeno kraljestvo, naj svojo zakonodajo uskladi z zakonodajo EU;
See, inter alia, Petitions 0401/2009 and 1119/2009. ; draws particular attention to the fact that this requirement introduces indirect discrimination on the grounds of nationality, contravening Article 4 of Regulation 883/2004; urges the United Kingdom to bring its legislation into line with EU law;
Zadeva C-299/05 z dne 18. oktobra 2007 in novejša Zadeva C-503/09 z dne 21. julija 2011. in naj ne uporablja „preskusa pretekle prisotnosti“, če je mogoče za vzpostavitev dejanske povezave s sistemom socialnega varstva Združenega kraljestva uporabiti druge reprezentativne elemente;
Case C-299/05 of 18 October 2007 and, more recently, Case C-503/09 of 21 July 2011. and not to apply its so-called ‘Past Presence Test’ when other representative elements can be used to establish a genuine link with the United Kingdom social security system;
29. poziva države članice, ki tega še niso storile, naj v okviru splošnega sistema, v skladu s členom 10 direktive o poklicih kvalifikacijah, vzpostavijo sistem dopolnilnih ukrepov , saj v nasprotnem primeru prihaja do diskriminacije na podlagi nacionalnosti; ob tem poudarja, da so državljani držav članic, ki so se EU pridružile leta 2004 in 2007, zlasti zdravstveno osebje (zdravniki, babice in medicinske sestre), poročali o težavah, povezanih s priznavanjem kvalifikacij ali pridobljenih pravic v državi članici, ki ni njihova matična država članica
Urges those Member States which have not yet done so to set up the system of compensation measures required under Article 10 of the Qualifications Directive, in the framework of the General System, as their failure to do so appears to create discrimination on the basis of nationality; points out, in that connection, that citizens of the Member States having joined the EU in 2004 and 2007 respectively, in particular healthcare professionals (doctors, midwives and nurses), reported encountering problems relating to the recognition of their qualifications or of their acquired rights in a Member State other than their own
Glej med drugim peticijo 112/2009. ;
See, inter alia, Petition 112/2009. ;
Glej med drugim peticiji 511/1998 in 689/1998. ; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje preučevanje obstoječe „reforme Gelmini“, ki je začela veljati decembra 2010; poziva italijanske oblasti in tamkajšnje univerze, naj to vprašanje čim prej rešijo; vseeno meni, da ne gre za osamljen primer in da bi se zato lahko varuhi človekovih pravic držav članic srečali, da bi razpravljali o rešitvah, ki so potrebne v Evropi;
See, inter alia, Petitions 511/1998 and 689/1998. ; calls on the Commission to investigate further the current so-called ‘Gelmini reform’, which entered into force in December 2010; calls on the Italian authorities and the respective universities to resolve this case as a matter of urgency; takes the view, however, that this is not an isolated case and that the Member States’ ombudsmen could therefore meet to exchange views on solutions to be introduced in Europe;
32. opozarja, da Uredba (ES) št. 2201/2003
Recalls that Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003
Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo ter o razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 1347/2000, UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
1. določa načelo, da mora biti otrokom po razvezi staršev omogočeno vzdrževanje odnosa z obema staršema, čeprav živita v različnih državah članicah; poudarja, da čeprav je priprava in izvajanje konkretnih pravil o pravicah do dostopa trenutno v pristojnosti držav članic, pa morajo te pri izvajanju svojih pristojnosti spoštovati zakonodajo Skupnosti, zlasti določbe Pogodbe o svobodi vseh državljanov EU do potovanja in prebivanja v drugi državi članici
1. lays down the principle that children should be able to maintain their relationships with both parents after the latter have separated, even if they live in different Member States; points out that, although the introduction and application of substantive rules on access rights is currently a Member State matter, the Member States must respect Union law when exercising their powers, in particular the Treaty provisions concerning the freedom of all EU citizens to travel and reside in another Member State
33. opozarja na pomen upravnega sodelovanja pri vprašanjih osebnega stanja; poudarja, na primer, da mora vsaka država, ki želi spremeniti listine o osebnem stanju otroka, priznane v državi članici Unije, to državo članico o tem obvestiti, zato da listin, kot so potrdila o rojstvu, ne bi bilo mogoče spremeniti tako, da bi izbrisali izvor otroka;
Points out the importance of administrative cooperation on civil-status issues; notes, for example, that any Member State intending to modify a child’s civil-status documents recognised in another Member State of the Union must inform the Member State in question of its intention to do so, so that documents such as birth certificates cannot be modified in such a way as to erase the origin of the child’s identity;
35. poziva, naj se v vsaki državi članici imenuje mediator ali vsaj mediator za otroke, ki bi imel zadostna sredstva, da bi lahko dostopal do vseh dokumentov in vplival na sodne odločbe, in to z namenom usklajevanja pritožb in pravnih težav staršev, ki se razhajajo, da bi tem preprečili odločanje za nezakonita dejanja, s katerimi bi uveljavljali to, kar je po njihovem mnenju njihova pravica in pravica njihovih otrok; dodaja, da lahko državljani predložijo zadevo mediatorju v svoji matični državi ali državi, kjer menijo, da je prišlo do kršitve njegovih pravic;
Calls for the appointment of a mediator or, at the very least, a children’s mediator in every Member State, who would have sufficient powers to access any documents and review court decisions, with the aim of reconciling the claims and legal difficulties of parents who are separating, in order to prevent them from opting for unlawful conduct in order to enforce what they regard as their right and that of their children; adds that any citizen may bring a matter before the mediator in their home country or in the country in which, in his or her opinion, his or her rights have not been respected;
41. predlaga, da se ob včlanitvi v nacionalno stranko pogosteje predlaga še včlanitev v evropsko politično stranko, saj bi s tem spodbudili politično udejstvovanje državljanov v Evropi;
Proposes that membership of a European political party could be suggested more often when someone joins a national party, as a way of promoting citizens’ political involvement in Europe;
47. želi, da bi se lahko vsak državljan EU, ki meni, da je žrtev pretirane vneme ali zlorabe prevladujočega položaja s strani upravnih ali policijskih organov druge države članice, zlahka obrnil na nacionalni ali lokalni organ, pristojen za pritožbe proti tem organom;
Calls for it to be easy for any EU citizen claiming to have been the victim of overzealous treatment or of an abuse of dominant position by the administrative or police authorities of another Member State to approach the national or local authority responsible for complaints against those bodies;
50. meni, da mora komuniciranje Unije bolj redno potekati prek televizije, ki je pomembno informacijsko sredstvo; zato pozdravlja dodatna proračunska sredstva, dodeljena kanalu Euronews;
Believes that the Union should communicate more regularly via television, which is an important vehicle for the provision of information; welcomes, therefore, the additional budget funds allocated to Euronews;
56. poziva Parlament in Evropski svet, naj zagotovita, da bodo države članice imele zadostna proračunska sredstva za dobro izvedbo evropskega leta državljanov 2013 in z njim povezanih dejavnosti, zlasti z vidika medijev, če želimo, da bodo zastavljeni cilji doseženi;
Calls on Parliament and the Council to ensure that the Member States have sufficient budget funds to ensure that the European Year of Citizens in 2013 and the associated activities, particularly those involving the media, run smoothly, so that the objectives set can be attained;
COM(2010)0603 je Evropska komisija objavila oktobra 2010.
COM(2010)0603 final. ‘ was published by the European Commission in October 2010.
Na podlagi predloga iz poročila Evropskega parlamenta „Težave in perspektive v zvezi z državljanstvom Unije“ z dne 20. marca 2009
Starting from the suggestion included in the European Parliament’s report on ‘Problems and prospects concerning European citizenship’ of 20 March 2009
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2009-0204&language=EN&ring=A6-2009-0182 . se je Komisija posvetovala s civilno družbo in pripravila pregled najpomembnejših ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo državljani pri uveljavljanju svojih pravic prek nacionalnih meja.
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2009-0204&language=EN&ring=A6-2009-0182 . , the Commission consulted civil society and drew up a scoreboard of the most important obstacles that the citizens face in the exercise of their rights across borders.
Poročilo o državljanstvu EU iz leta 2010 je celovitejše od predhodnih poročil, ki so v skladu s členom 25 PDEU vsebovali predvsem opisni povzetek najpomembnejših dosežkov na področju državljanstva EU v ustreznem triletnem obdobju.
The ‘EU Citizenship Report 2010’ is also more comprehensive than its predecessors, which mainly provided a descriptive summary, required by Article 25 TFEU, of the major developments regarding EU citizenship in the relevant three-year period.
Navaja 25 ovir, s katerimi se srečujejo državljani v različnih vlogah (kot fizične osebe, potrošniki, prebivalci, študenti, turisti in kot poklicni strokovnjaki ali politični akterji), in predlaga rešitve za njihovo odpravljanje.
It identifies 25 obstacles that citizens face in different roles (as private individuals, consumers, residents, students, tourists and professionals or political actors) and puts forward solutions for overcoming them.
Ta osnutek poročila preučuje ukrepe, ki jih je predlagala Evropska komisija, in sicer na podlagi peticij, ki jih je prejel Odbor za peticije v referenčnem obdobju 2008-2011, zato je bilo mogoče upoštevati tudi nedavna dogajanja.
This draft report scrutinises the actions proposed by the European Commission from the perspective of petitions received by the Committee on Petitions during the reference period 2008-2011 which allowed taking into account the most recent developments.
V ta namen je bilo analiziranih več kot 300 prejetih peticij.
For this purpose, more than 300 relevant petitions received were analysed.
Peticije so pristna povratna informacija o izvajanju različnih politik in izražajo stopnjo zadovoljstva z Evropsko unijo.
Petitions provide first-hand feedback from citizens on the implementation of different policies and gauge the degree of satisfaction with the European Union.
Predlagatelji peticije se udeležujejo sej odbora PETI in imajo priložnost sodelovati v preglednem in neposrednem dialogu s poslanci Evropskega parlamenta.
Petitioners attend committee meetings and are given the opportunity to engage in a transparent, direct dialogue with Members of the European Parliament.
V zadnjih letih je bilo registriranih veliko peticij, ki so zadevale težave, s katerimi se srečujejo državljani EU pri uveljavljanju pravice do prostega gibanja.
Over the last years, an increasing number of petitions have been registered with respect to problems encountered by EU citizens who exercise their right to free movement.
Statistični podatki, vključeni v letna poročila Odbora za peticije, kažejo, da vprašanja v zvezi s prostim gibanjem zajemajo približno 25 % skupnega števila prejetih peticij.
Statistics included in the annual reports of the Committee on Petitions show that issues related to free movement account for approximately 25% of the total number of petitions received.
Sodna praksa Sodišča Evropske unije je evropskemu državljanstvu dala večjo vsebino, prosto gibanje pa je postavila v ospredje kot temeljno pravico, ki omogoča uživanje široke palete drugih temeljnih pravic.
The case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union has given increasing substance to European citizenship and placed free movement at the forefront, as the basic right which gives rise to a wide array of other essential rights.
Prosto gibanje je eden od najdragocenejših dosežkov EU.
Free movement is one of the EU’s most cherished achievements.
Na podlagi najnovejše raziskave Eurobarometra je bilo ugotovljeno, da „je pravica, ki jo državljani EU najbolje poznajo, še vedno pravica do prostega gibanja in bivanja“, saj to pravico prepozna kar 88 % ljudi
A recent Eurobarometer survey found ‘the right most familiar to EU citizens continues to be the right to free movement and residence’, with 88% of people recognising this right
Eurobarometer, Državljanstvo Evropske unije – analitično poročilo , (Serija Flash EB #294, oktober 2010). .
Eurobarometer, European Union citizenship – analytical report, (Flash EB Series #294, October 2010). .
Čeprav je bil na tem področju dosežen velik napredek, številne peticije, predložene po začetku veljavnosti direktive o pravicah državljanov
Although considerable progress has been achieved in this respect, following the entry into force of the ‘Citizenship Directive’
Direktiva 2004/38/ES o pravici državljanov Unije in njihovih družinskih članov do prostega gibanja in prebivanja na ozemlju držav članic ([2004] UL L 158/77). , kažejo, da so v zvezi z izvajanjem te direktive še vedno prisotne težave.
Directive 2004/38/EC on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States ([2004] OJ L158/77). , numerous petitions bear witness to the fact that there are still many problems related to the implementation of the directive.
Nekatere države članice ne priznavajo v celoti pravic družinskih članov iz tretjih držav.
Some Member States do not fully recognise the rights of third country family members.
Tako je bilo na podlagi več peticij ugotovljeno, da Združeno kraljestvo ni dovolilo družinskim članom, ki niso iz držav EU, vstopa brez vizuma, čeprav so imeli dovoljenje za prebivanje, izdano v drugi državi članici.
For instance, several petitions showed that the United Kingdom did not allow non-EU family members to enter without a visa, even though they had residence cards issued by another Member State.
Oblasti Združenega kraljestva so zahtevale prekomerno število dokumentov, prošnje so obravnavale z velikimi zamudami, prav tako pa so zadržale izvirnike dokumentov.
The UK authorities asked for an excessive number of documents, processed applications with excessive delays and retained the original documents.
Po posredovanju Evropske komisije se je na podlagi številnih prejetih pritožb in peticij upravna praksa nekoliko izboljšala.
Following the intervention of the European Commission, based on many complaints and petitions received, some improvements in the administrative practices have been initiated.