natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
se strinja, da je radijski spekter ključni vir za številne dejavnosti in da je pomemben za dobro delovanje notranjega trga; poudarja, da bi morala uporaba tržnih mehanizmov ščititi interese potrošnikov in spodbujati sprejemanje inovativnih izdelkov in storitev; se tudi strinja, da je treba v skladu s členom 151(4) Pogodbe ES upoštevati tudi družbene, kulturne in politične vidike; nadalje meni, da lahko avdiovizualna politika, spodbujanje kulturne in jezikovne raznolikosti ter pluralizem medijev upravičijo odstopanje od načela nevtralnosti storitev;
Agrees that radio spectrum is a key resource for many activities and important for the proper functioning of the internal market; emphasises that the use of market mechanisms should safeguard the interests of consumers and encourage the take up of innovative products and services; agrees also that social, cultural and political considerations must also be taken into account in line with Article 151(4) of the EC Treaty; considers, furthermore, that audiovisual policy, the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and the pluralism of the media may justify exceptions from the principle of service neutrality;
meni, da bi lahko na ravni držav članic upravni način dodeljevanja pravic do spektra dopolnili tako, da se več frekvenc nameni uporabi brez licenc, torej možni skupni uporabi, ter da se dovoli trgovanje s spektrom pod pogojem, da ta širitev ne ogroža kontinuitete in kakovosti storitev, povezanih z obveščanjem javnosti in njeno zaščito; meni, da je treba pojasniti pojav in standardne pogoje trgovanja s spektrom;
Considers that the administrative method of allocating spectrum rights could be supplemented by Member States opening up more frequencies to unlicensed, and therefore possibly shared use, and by allowing spectrum trading on condition that this opening up does not harm the continuity and quality of services concerned with public information and safety; takes the view that the phenomenon and the standard conditions of spectrum trading should be clarified;
poudarja, kako so komunikacije pomembne za podeželske in manj razvite regije, kjer bi lahko razširjanje širokopasovnosti, mobilnih komunikacij na nižjih frekvencah in novih brezžičnih tehnologij pomenilo učinkovite rešitve, ki bi v vseh 27 državah članicah EU zagotovile pokritost v celoti in s tem omogočile trajnostni razvoj vseh področij; meni, da se pri uresničevanju celotne pokritosti vseh področij breme ne sme prenesti na vpletene regije;
Emphasises the importance of communication for rural and less developed regions, for which the diffusion of broadband, of lower frequency mobile communications and of new wireless technologies could provide efficient solutions to achieving universal coverage of the 27 EU Member States with a view to the sustainable development of all areas; believes that complete coverage of all areas must not be achieved by transferring the burden to the regions concerned;
poudarja nevarnost pomanjkanja frekvence in težav zaradi motenj, ki jih povzroča vzporedno analogno-digitalno oddajanje med državami članicami in sosednjimi tretjimi državami, ter poudarja, da bi morale vse države in regije EU imeti koristi od digitalne dividende;
Emphasises the risk of frequency shortage and of interference problems due to analogue-digital simulcasting between Member States and bordering third countries and emphasises also that all EU countries and regions should benefit from the digital dividend;
ugotavlja, da je treba zaradi pomanjkanja virov ustrezen del spektra dodeliti tako, da bo zadovoljil potrebe potrošnikov ter potrebe po storitvah javnega in splošnega interesa, vključno z radiodifuzijo; poleg tega poudarja, da je treba v primeru nespoštovanja obveznosti pri dodeljevanju frekvenc vključiti klavzulo o ponovnem dodeljevanju frekvenc;
Notes that, given the scarcity of the resource, adequate amounts of spectrum should be allocated to meet the needs of consumers and of services of public and general interest, including broadcasting services; stresses also the need to include a clause on reallocating frequencies where the commitments made when frequencies are assigned are not fulfilled;
poziva države članice, naj opredelijo prednost, ki jo bo imela zaščita javnega interesa in frekvenc strateškega pomena, kar je ključno načelo pri razvoju politike upravljanja spektra;
Urges Member States to take a decision on the priority to be given to the protection of the public interest and of frequencies of strategic importance as a key principle in developing spectrum management policies;
priznava, da je učinkovitost pri upravljanju spektra skupna naloga držav članic, nacionalnih regulatorjev in industrije; vztraja pri tem, da je potrebno zagotoviti stabilnost in kontinuiteto medijskih storitev, ki jih nudijo izdajatelji radijskega in televizijskega programa, vendar hkrati poudarja pomen enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za nove udeležence in tehnologije; meni, da je treba v korist potrošnikov, podjetij in zaposlovanja na splošno zagotoviti prostor inovacijam; poziva Komisijo, naj razjasni posebna tveganja, povezana z motnjami, in pogoje uporabe novih pravil v državah članicah ter predlaga prilagojene rešitve;
Recognises spectrum efficiency as a common duty of Member States, national regulators and industry; insists on the necessity of securing the stability and continuity of the media services provided by broadcasters, but emphasises the importance of a level playing field for new entrants and for new technologies; believes that room for innovation must be guaranteed, in the interest of consumers, enterprises and employment generally; calls on the Commission to clarify the specific risks relating to interferences and conditions of applications of new rules in the new Member States and to propose adapted solutions;
poziva Komisijo, naj pri pregledu pravnega okvira za elektronska komunikacijska omrežja in storitve zagotovi, da se pri dodeljevanju zmogljivosti prenosa na evropski ravni dovolj upošteva pomen radiodifuzije za svobodno oblikovanje mnenja posameznikov in javnosti ter za raznolikost mnenj;
Calls on the Commission to ensure, when reviewing the legal framework for electronic communications networks and services, that sufficient account is taken of the significance of broadcasting, with regard to the freedom of opinion of individuals, and of diversity of opinion, when transmission capacities are allocated at European level;
ugotavlja, da se morajo storitve javnega in splošnega interesa prilagajati spremembam v tehnologiji, da bi se ohranila njihova visoka kakovost;
Notes that, in order to preserve their high quality, services of public and general interest need to adapt to changing technology;
ugotavlja, da je za razvoj novih storitev in novih oblik brezžičnih tehnologij bistven dostop do usklajenih frekvenčnih pasov, saj si industrija prizadeva za skupne pogoje uporabe, ki omogočajo fleksibilnost in učinkovito uporabo spektra, zato da bi se preprečile hude omejitve rasti v sektorju IKT v EU v primeru, če frekvence, ki naj bi novim potrebam ustrezale, ne bi bile dodeljene;
Notes that access to harmonised frequency bands is essential for the development of new services and new types of wireless technology, as industry seeks common conditions of use that provide flexibility and efficient use of the spectrum, in order to prevent severe constraints on the growth of the ICT sector in the EU, if the frequencies intended to meet these new needs are not allocated;
pozdravlja predlog Komisije o uvedbi tržno usmerjenega pristopa k spektru in priznava, da se bo običajni model še naprej uporabljal, zlasti tam, kjer gre za pomembne javne interese;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal to introduce a market-based approach to spectrum, and acknowledges that the traditional model will continue to be relevant, in particular where important public interests are at stake;
meni, da bo uvedba tržnega pristopa k spektru najbolj učinkovita, če bo temeljila na soglasnem dogovoru, ki ga bodo podprli regulativni organi, operaterji in drugi akterji; v zvezi s tem opozarja na delo Skupine evropskih regulatorjev (SER) in Skupine za politiko radijskega spektra;
Considers that the introduction of a market-based approach to spectrum will be most effective if based on a consensual agreement backed by regulators, operators and other actors; draws attention, in this regard, to the work of the European Regulatory Group (ERG) and the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG);
zahteva, naj se predlogi Evropske komisije o upravljanju in trgovanju s spektrom natančno preučijo ter se na politični ravni doseže skupni dogovor o njihovem izvajanju;
Asks that the proposals of the European Commission on spectrum management and tradability be carefully considered and that a common agreement at political level be reached for their implementation;
ugotavlja, da se s sprostitvijo spektra obstoječim uporabnikom porajajo številna vprašanja, in zato poziva k jasnemu pravnemu okviru, ki bo zagotavljal na konkurenčnosti temelječe rešitve in med drugim opredelil tudi pogoje za vstop in izstop, ohranjanje pravic do spektra, odgovornosti glede motenj in mehanizme za reševanje sporov;
Notes that the freeing-up of spectrum raises a number of issues for existing users and calls, therefore, for a clear legal framework providing for competition-based solutions and defining, inter alia, conditions for entry and exit, the maintenance of spectrum rights, responsibilities with regard to interference and dispute resolution mechanisms;
predlaga naj se, da bi dosegli tehnološko usklajenost, oblikujejo minimalni skupni tehnični in ureditveni pogoji za zagotovitev tehničnega soobstoja in v izogib motnjam, posebna pozornost pa naj se nameni preprečevanju negativnega vpliva na uporabo že dodeljenih frekvenčnih pasov in ureditvi čezmejnih vprašanj;
Suggests that in order to achieve technological harmonisation, minimal common technical and regulatory conditions be developed with a view to ensuring technical co-existence and the avoidance of interference, with particular attention being paid to ensuring that the utilisation of frequency bands already assigned cannot be adversely affected and that cross border issues are settled;
je prepričan, da bodo v prihodnosti na voljo še bolj dovršeni paketi, kot so že obstoječi paketi trojnih storitev, ki ponujajo govorno tehnologijo, dostop do interneta in televizijo, in da se bodo na ta način meje med izdelki in storitvami na področju elektronskih komunikacij v prihodnje še bolj zabrisale;
Is convinced that we will see in the future even more sophisticated packages on offer than the already existing triple play packages, offering voice telephony, internet access and television and that, as a result, the borders between products and services in the area of electronic communications will in the future become even more blurred;
meni, da je treba poleg tržnega pristopa pozornost nameniti tudi temu, da se dostop do trga za spekter zagotovi vsem; ugotavlja, da se tak dostop lahko omogoči le, če se z izobraževanjem ali alternativnimi možnostmi usposabljanja zagotovijo informacije, znanje in tehnološka infrastruktura;
Considers that, besides the market-based approach, attention should also be given to ensuring access to the spectrum market for everyone; notes that, in order to guarantee such access, information, knowledge and technological infrastructure should be provided via education or alternative training opportunities;
ugotavlja, da so ureditve za dodeljevanje in izkoriščanje spektra v državah članicah zelo različne, kar predstavlja resno oviro za doseganje dobro delujočega enotnega trga;
Notes that the divergence in Member State regimes for spectrum allocation and exploitation differ widely and that these differences represent serious obstacles to the achievement of a well-functioning single market;
države članice poziva, naj podprejo ukrepe okrepljenega sodelovanja med organi, ki upravljajo s spektrom, ugotovijo, ali obstajajo področja, kjer bi skupno dodeljevanje spektra omogočilo uveljavljanje novih tehnologij in storitev, pospešijo izmenjavo informacij ter odstranijo omejitve zaradi prestrogih predpisov in ureditev;
Calls on Member States to support enhanced cooperation measures between spectrum management authorities, to consider areas where common spectrum allocation would allow new technologies and services to emerge, to step up their information exchanges and to remove over-prescriptive regulatory constraints;
poudarja, da je za prehod treba zagotoviti dovolj časa in zato poziva k uporabi načela postopnosti na tem področju; meni, da je treba upoštevati vpliv na manjša omrežja, zlasti lokalna brezžična omrežja, za katera sedaj dovoljenja niso potrebna, in da je treba spodbujati univerzalni širokopasovni dostop, zlasti na podeželju;
Emphasises the need for sufficient time for transition and calls, therefore, for a step-by-step approach in this field; is of the opinion that effects for smaller networks - especially local wireless networks - for which no license requirements currently apply must be taken into account and that universal access to broadband, especially in rural areas, should be promoted;
poudarja potencialno vrednost spektra, sproščenega ob digitalnem preklopu (digitalna dividenda), ki lahko poveča splošno razpoložljivost cenovno sprejemljivega mobilnega/brezžičnega širokopasovnega dostopa, tudi na podeželju;
Emphasises the potential value of the spectrum released by the digital switchover (digital dividend) which could increase the widespread availability of affordable mobile/wireless broadband, including in rural areas;
poziva, naj se za spodbujanje pravne varnosti oblikujejo jasne opredelitve pravic in obveznosti; poudarja, da je pomembno ločevati ponudnike infrastrukture od ponudnikov elektronskih komunikacijskih storitev ter preprečevati nastajanje monopolov;
Urges the establishment of clear definitions of rights and obligations to promote legal certainty; underlines the importance of separation between providers of infrastructure and providers of electronic communications services and the importance of avoiding the creation of monopolies;
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o uveljavljanju glasovalnih pravic delničarjev družb, ki imajo sedež v državi članici in katerih delnice so sprejete v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu, ter o spremembi Direktive 2004/109/ES ( KOM(2005)0685 – C6-0003/2006 – 2005/0265(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the exercise of voting rights by shareholders of companies having their registered office in a Member State and whose shares are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2004/109/EC ( COM(2005)0685 – C6-0003/2006 – 2005/0265(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0685 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0685 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 251(2) ter 44 in 95 Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0003/2006 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 44 and 95 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0003/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ter mnenja Odbor za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve ( A6-0024/2007 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A6-0024/2007 ),
poziva Komisijo, naj se posvetuje s Parlamentom pred dokončnim oblikovanjem priporočila v zvezi z vprašanji in temami, ki so povezani s predlagano direktivo;
Asks the Commission to consult Parliament before finalising a Recommendation related to issues and topics in the context of the proposed Directive;
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o ustanovitvi Evropske skupnosti in zlasti členov 44 in 95 Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 44 and 95 thereof,
ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora UL C 318, 23.12.2006, str.
Having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee OJ C 318, 23.12.2006, p.
v skladu s postopkom, določenim v členu 251 Pogodbe Stališče Evropskega parlamenta z dne 15. februarja 2007.
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty Position of the European Parliament of 15 February 2007.
V svojem sporočilu Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z dne 21. maja 2003 z naslovom "Posodobitev prava gospodarskih družb in izboljšanje upravljanja podjetij v Evropski uniji– načrt za korak naprej" je Komisija navedla, da bi bilo treba uvesti nove prilagojene pobude z namenom okrepitve pravic delničarjev v družbah, ki kotirajo na borzi, in da bi bilo treba čim hitreje rešiti probleme, povezane s čezmejnim glasovanjem.
In its Communication to the Council and the European Parliament of 21 May 2003, entitled "Modernising Company Law and enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union – A Plan to Move Forward", the Commission indicated that new tailored initiatives should be taken with a view to enhancing shareholders' rights in listed companies and that problems relating to cross-border voting should be solved as a matter of urgency.
V svoji resoluciji z dne 21. aprila 2004 UL C 104 E, 30.4.2004, str.
In its Resolution of 21 April 2004 OJ C 104 E, 30.4.2004, p.
je Evropski parlament izrazil svojo podporo namenu Komisije o okrepitvi pravic delničarjev, zlasti preko razširitve pravil o preglednosti, glasovalnih pravic pooblaščenca, možnosti udeležbe na skupščinah delničarjev z elektronskimi sredstvi in zagotavljanja, da se lahko uveljavlja čezmejne glasovalne pravice.
, the European Parliament expressed its support for the Commission's intention to strengthen shareholders' rights, in particular through the extension of the rules on transparency, proxy voting rights, the possibility of participating in general meetings via electronic means and ensuring that cross-border voting rights are able to be exercised.
Imetniki delnic z glasovalnimi pravicami bi morali imeti možnost uveljavljati te pravice glede na to, da se te odražajo v ceni, ki se plača ob nakupu delnic.
Holders of shares carrying voting rights should be able to exercise those rights given that they are reflected in the price that has to be paid at the acquisition of the shares.
Hkrati je uspešen delničarski nadzor pogoj za dobro upravljanje družb in bi ga bilo zato treba olajšati in spodbujati.
Furthermore, effective shareholder control is a pre-requisite to sound corporate governance and should, therefore, be facilitated and encouraged.
V ta namen je zato treba sprejeti ukrepe za približevanje zakonodaje držav članic.
It is therefore necessary to adopt measures to approximate the laws of the Member States to this end.
Treba bi bilo odstraniti ovire, ki delničarje odvračajo od glasovanja, na primer pogoj začasne zaustavitve trgovanja z delnicami v določenem obdobju pred skupščino delničarjev, če hoče delničar uveljavljati glasovalne pravice.
Obstacles which deter shareholders from voting, such as making the exercise of voting rights subject to the blocking of shares during a certain period before the general meeting, should be removed.
Vendar pa ta direktiva ne vpliva na obstoječo zakonodajo Skupnosti glede enot, ki jih izdajajo kolektivni naložbeni podjemi, ali glede enot, ki se pridobijo ali odsvojijo v takšnih podjemih.
However, this Directive does not affect existing Community legislation on units issued by collective investment undertakings or on units acquired or disposed of in such undertakings.
Obstoječa zakonodaja Skupnosti ne zadostuje za doseganje tega cilja.
The existing Community legislation is not sufficient to achieve this objective.
Direktiva 2001/34/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 28. maja 2001 o sprejemu vrednostnih papirjev v uradno kotacijo na borzi in o informacijah, ki jih je treba objaviti v zvezi s temi vrednostnimi papirji UL L 184, 6.7.2001, str.
Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 May 2001 on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities OJ L 184, 6.7.2001, p.
, se osredotoča na informacije, ki jih morajo izdajatelji razkriti trgu, in zato ne obravnava samega procesa glasovanja delničarjev.
focuses on the information issuers have to disclose to the market and accordingly does not deal with the shareholder voting process itself.
Hkrati Direktiva 2004/109/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 15. decembra 2004 o uskladitvi zahtev v zvezi s preglednostjo informacij o izdajateljih, katerih vrednostni papirji so sprejeti v trgovanje na reguliranem trgu UL L 390, 31.12.2004, str.
Moreover, Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market OJ L 390, 31.12.2004, p.
, nalaga izdajateljem obveznost, da morajo dati na razpolago nekatere informacije in listine, pomembne za skupščine delničarjev, vendar pa je treba dati te informacije in listine na razpolago v matični državi članici izdajatelja.
imposes on issuers an obligation to make available certain information and documents relevant to general meetings, but such information and documents are to be made available in the issuer's home Member State.
V primeru ostalih pravic, razen glasovalne pravice, lahko države članice uporabo minimalnih standardov razširijo na delnice brez glasovalne pravice, če se za te delnice teh standardov že ne uporablja.
As regards rights other than the right to vote, Member States are free to extend the application of these minimum standards also to non-voting shares, to the extent that those shares do not enjoy such standards already.
Pomembni deleži delnic v družbah, ki kotirajo na borzi, so v rokah delničarjev, ki ne prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri ima družba registriran sedež.
Significant proportions of shares in listed companies are held by shareholders who do not reside in the Member State in which the company has its registered office.
Delničarji, ki prebivajo v drugi državi, bi morali imeti možnost uveljavljati svoje pravice na skupščinah delničarjev tako preprosto kot delničarji, ki prebivajo v državi članici, v kateri ima družba registriran sedež.
Non-resident shareholders should be able to exercise their rights in relation to the general meeting as easily as shareholders who reside in the Member State in which the company has its registered office.
Odprava teh ovir bi prav tako koristila delničarjem, ki prebivajo v dani državi članici in se ne morejo ali se ne udeležijo skupščine delničarjev.
The removal of these obstacles should also benefit resident shareholders who do not or cannot attend the general meeting.
Delničarji bi morali imeti možnost, da premišljeno glasujejo na skupščini delničarjev ali pred njo, ne glede na to, kje prebivajo.
Shareholders should be able to cast informed votes at, or in advance of, the general meeting, no matter where they reside.
Vsi delničarji bi morali imeti dovolj časa, da premislijo o listinah, ki naj bi bile predložene skupščini delničarjev, in se odločijo, kako bodo glasovali s svojimi delnicami.
All shareholders should have sufficient time to consider the documents intended to be submitted to the general meeting and determine how they will vote their shares.
V ta namen bi bilo treba delničarje pravočasno obvestiti o skupščini delničarjev in jim zagotoviti popolne informacije, ki se predložijo skupščini delničarjev.
To this end, timely notice should be given of the general meeting, and shareholders should be provided with the complete information intended to be submitted to the general meeting.
Treba bi bilo uporabiti možnosti, ki jih ponujajo moderne tehnologije, s katerimi se omogoči takojšen dostop do informacij.
The possibilities which modern technologies offer to make information instantly accessible should be exploited.