natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker je v sporazumu, doseženem na usklajevanju, ki je potekalo 25. novembra 2004, zapisano, da "celotni znesek odobritev plačil, ki je bil določen na koncu decembrskega proračunskega postopka za leto 2005, ne sme preseči 106.3 milijarde evrov", oziroma 1.004% BND Skupnosti, kar je pod ravnjo, določeno v prvi obravnavi (1.05% ali 111 milijard evrov), v predhodnem predlogu proračuna Komisije (1.035% ali 109 milijard evrov) ter v zgornjih mejah finančnega načrta (1.08% ali 114 milijard evrov),
whereas the compromise reached at the Conciliation of 25 November 2004 states that the ‘total amount for payment appropriations decided at the end of the 2005 budgetary procedure in December shall not exceed EUR 106.3 billion’, that is 1.004% of Community GNI, which is below its level at first reading (1.05% or €111 billion), the Commission’s Preliminary Draft Budget (1,035% or €109 billion) and the ceilings of the financial perspectives (1.08% or €114 billion),
ker je ta sporazum skladen s predlogom podpisnikov tako imenovanega "pisma šestih" ter s predlogom proračuna Sveta (0.99% ali 105 milijard evrov), ki je bil potrjen na drugi obravnavi,
whereas this agreement is in accordance with the proposal of the signatories of the so‑called ‘Letter of the Six’ and with the Council’s Draft Budget (0,99% or €105 Bn), which was confirmed at its second reading,
ker dopolnitev in sprememba proračuna (DSP) št. 10/2004 (prej 11) kaže na potrebo dodatnih izplačil za strukturne sklade, ko se približujemo koncu obdobja trenutnega finančnega načrta,
whereas Supplementary and Amending Budget (SAB) No 10/2004 (ex-11) shows the need for extra payments in connection with the Structural Funds as we are approaching the end of the period of the current financial perspectives,
ker vse od leta 1997 velja trend vsakoletnega relativnega zniževanja proračuna, kar zmanjšuje manevrski prostor Parlamenta med uporabo najvišje stopnje povišanja in odpovedovanjem medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu,
whereas, since 1997, the trend is to have lower budgets each year in relative terms, which reduces Parliament’s margin for manoeuvre between employing the maximum rate of increase or denouncing the IIA,
ker obstaja jasna povezava med tem trendom in potrebo po kritju stroškov širitve z istimi finančnimi sredstvi, ter odzivanje na omejitve pakta stabilnosti in rasti,
whereas there is a clear connection between this trend and the need to accommodate the cost of enlargement with the same financial resources, as well to respond to the constraints of the Stability and Growth Pact,
ker težava ni samo pri izplačilih, ampak tudi pri (nizki) ravni obveznosti,
whereas the problem is not just the payments but also the (low) level of commitments,
ker je bil od leta 2000 instrument prilagodljivosti uporabljen že petkrat za kritje dodatnih proračunskih potreb, še posebno v rubriki 4 - zunanja politika, kar kaže na potrebo po ponovni preučitvi zgornjih mej nekaterih rubrik finančnega načrta, še posebno rubrike 4, za katere ni namenjenih dovolj finančnih sredstev,
whereas, since 2000, the flexibility instrument has already been used five times to cover extra budgetary needs, particularly under Heading 4, External Policy, which shows the need to revise the ceilings of some headings in the financial perspective, in particular Heading 4, which are clearly underfinanced,
ker je rubrika 4 rubrika, ki je najbolj prizadeta zaradi politike stalnih prerazporejanj in zmanjševanj finančnih sredstev vsled soočanja z novimi prednostnimi nalogami, kot so povojna obnova v nekdanji Jugoslaviji, Afganistanu in Iraku, ki zmanjšuje znesek za tradicionalne prednostne naloge Parlamenta, namenjen manj razvitim državam in državam v razvoju po vsem svetu,
whereas Heading 4 has been the heading that suffers most under a policy of constant redeployments and cuts in appropriations to face new priorities, namely reconstruction after the wars in Former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq, reducing the amount available for Parliament’s traditional priorities of assisting the less developed and developing countries worldwide,
ker je za leto 2005 sklenjeni globalni sporazum v okviru uporabe instrumenta prilagodljivosti, namenjenega decentraliziranim agencijam in Iraku, pod ravnjo zneska, izglasovanega na prvi obravnavi (100 milijonov evrov za Irak namesto 190 milijonov, ter 40 milijonov za decentralizirane agencije, namesto 54 milijonov ), kar bo povzročilo dodatna zmanjšanja in prerazporeditve, ki se nanašajo na glasovanje iz prve obravnave v rubriki 3 (notranja politika) ter 4, ki je že utrpela znižanje v primerjavi s proračunom iz leta 2004,
whereas the global agreement reached for 2005 in terms of the use of the flexibility instrument for decentralised agencies and Iraq is below the amounts voted in its first reading (€100 million for Iraq instead €190 million and €40 million for decentralised agencies instead of €54 million), which will imply further cuts and redeployments relative to its first reading vote in Headings 3 (Internal Policies) and 4, where some cuts had already been made in comparison with the 2004 budget,
ker ostajajo finančne težave tudi pri proračunu za leto 2006 pri rubrikah 3 in 4, še posebno v povezavi s sočasnim pojavom predhodno sklenjenih programov soodločanja, povečanih stroškov agencij ter skupne zunanje in varnostne politike,
whereas the financing problems remain for the 2006 budget in the case of both Heading 3 and Heading 4, in particular because of the simultaneous occurrence of the pre-agreed codecision programmes, the increasing cost of agencies and the Common Foreign and Security Policy,
ker bi morali posvetiti pozornost vsakoletnemu povečanju pomanjkanja preglednosti proračunskega postopka, zaradi česar je proračun za leto 2004 dober primer za to, saj se decembrska politična odločitev ne upošteva na koncu leta, zaradi številnih zmanjšanj, prerazporeditev ter prenosov med poglavji in rubrikami (za leto 2004 je bilo že 10 dopolnitev in sprememb proračuna ter več kot 70 proračunskih prenosov, vključno s splošnim prenosom, ki znaša 753 milijonov evrov,
whereas attention should be drawn to the increasing lack of transparency of the budget procedure in each succeeding year, the 2004 budget being a good example in that the political decision taken in December is not being respected at the end of the year because of the number of cuts, redeployments and transfers between chapters and headings (for 2004, there were already 10 SABs and more than 70 budget transfers, including a global transfer of €753 million),
ker se zaradi tega nekatere postavke od začetka ne bodo izvajale, ker se ve, da bo denar potreben drugje,
whereas this generates a policy whereby some lines will not be implemented from the start because it is a known fact that the money will be needed elsewhere,
ker proračun za leto 2005 označuje za najpomembnejše prednostne naloge najbolj liberalne vidike lizbonske strategije, vprašanja varnosti (boj proti terorizmu ter nadzor priseljevanja) ter kampanje za informiranje, kar je primer stalnega vsakoletnega spreminjanja proračunskih prednostnih nalog za približevanje tako imenovanim glavnim osem Evropske ustave, vključenih v predlogu Komisije za politični in finančni okvir 2007 - 2013,
whereas the 2005 budget identifies as the major priorities the most liberal aspects of the Lisbon Agenda, the security issues (fight against terrorism and migration control) and the information campaigns, which is an example of the continuing shift in budget priorities year by year towards the so-called main axes of the European Constitution, enshrined in the Commission proposal for the political and financial framework for 2007-2013,
ker je bilo za bistvene prednostne naloge, ki se nanašajo na gospodarsko rast, zaposlovanje, družbena vprašanja, trajnostni razvoj, varovanje okolja ter sodelovanje s tretjimi državami namenjeno bistveno premalo sredstev, te naloge pa tudi nimajo proračunskih instrumentov, ki bi jih spodbujali,
whereas essential priorities regarding economic growth, employment and social issues, sustainable development and environmental protection, and cooperation with third countries have been clearly underfinanced and lack the budgetary instruments they need to be promoted,
zavrača predlog proračuna za leto 2005 ter zahteva, naj Svet predloži proračun, ki bo upošteval dodatne kohezijske potrebe razširjene EU ter skrbi državljanov zaradi gospodarskih in okoljskih izzivov, s katerimi se sooča EU, vključno z obnovo gospodarstva in bojem proti brezposelnosti;
Rejects the Draft Budget for 2005 and asks the Council to forward a budget that responds to the extra Cohesion needs of an enlarged EU and the citizens’ concerns regarding the social, economic and environmental challenges facing the EU, including economic recovery and the fight against unemployment;
nasprotuje strategiji podpisnikov "pisma šestih", s katero želijo omejiti razpravo o proračunu ter bodočem finančnem načrtu na predlog proračuna, ki bi v prihodnje obsegal največ 1 % BND Skupnosti;
Opposes the strategy of the signatories of the ‘Letter of the Six’ of restricting the debate on the budget and on the future financial perspectives by proposing a budget of a maximum of 1% of Community GNI for the upcoming period;
obžaluje podporo, ki jo Svet nudi tej strategiji;
Considers it regrettable that the Council should support this strategy;
izraža pripravljenost za popolno uporabo svojih proračunskih pooblastil, če ne bo mogel biti dosežen primeren proračun za leto 2005; v tem oziru izraža svojo zavezanost k dobremu proračunskemu upravljanju;
Recalls its willingness to use the full extent of its budgetary powers if a reasonable budget for 2005 cannot be achieved; recalls, in this context, its commitment to sound budgetary management;
opozarja, da proračun ni edini instrument za doseganje gospodarske in družbene kohezije, polne zaposlenosti in trajnostnega razvoja; prekiniti bi bilo treba s trenutnimi gospodarskimi, monetarnimi in zaposlitvenimi politikami ter strukturami, ki jih podpirajo na ravni EU.
Recalls that the budget is not the only instrument for achieving economic and social cohesion, full employment and sustainable development; a rupture should be made with the current economic, monetary and employment policies and the structures that support it at EU level.
ki ga predlaga António Costa
by António Costa
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu glede kazenskega sodišča Evropske unije
on the quality of criminal justice in the European Union
Priporočilo Evropskega parlamenta Svetu glede kazenskega sodišča Evropske unije
European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the quality of criminal justice in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju, da členi 47-50 Listine o temeljnih pravicah ter člena 6 in 13 Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah določajo področje 'pravice do sodnega varstva', ki jih morajo Unija in njene države članice v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi zagotavljati evropskim državljanom,
whereas Articles 47 to 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Articles 6 to 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights define the scope of the 'right to justice' which the Union and its Member States, each within its jurisdiction, must guarantee EU citizens,
ob upoštevanju, da 'pravica do sodnega varstva' vsebuje še zlasti pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, do nepristranskega sojenja, do pravičnega sojenja, do sojenja v razumnem roku, pravico do pravne pomoči ter da je zaščita teh pravic še pomembnejša v kazenskem postopku,
whereas this 'right to justice' includes, in particular, the right to an effective remedy, the right of access to an impartial tribunal, the right to a fair trial, the right to be tried within a reasonable time and the right of access to legal aid, and whereas protection of these rights is all the more important in respect of criminal proceedings,
ob prepričanju, da je varstvo v prvi vrsti odvisno od pristojnosti vsake države članice, ki ga ta zagotavlja v skladu s svojo ustavno ureditvijo in pravno tradicijo; pristop k Uniji pa po eni strani pomeni, da je treba svojim državljanom zagotoviti podobno obravnavo kot je v Uniji ter po drugi strani krepiti medsebojno zaupanje med državami članicami, da bodo vzajemno priznavale sodbe ter tudi prepuščale svoje državljane sodnikom druge države članice,
convinced that responsibility for protecting these rights lies first and foremost with each Member States which does so in accordance with its own constitutional set-up and legal traditions, but that membership of the Union means that European citizens should be guaranteed comparable treatment throughout the Union and that there should be greater trust between Member States with a view to mutual recognition of judicial decisions, including even the surrender of their own citizens to the courts of another Member State,
ob upoštevanju, da osnutek Ustavne pogodbe (člen III-260) in Haški program (odstavek 3.2) službi kazenskega sodišča Evrope priznavata pomen vzajemnega ocenjevanja med državami članicami za krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja, ki zahteva določitev ustreznejših orodij in postopkov vrednotenja in pospeševanja izmenjave informacij ter možnosti usposabljanja,
recalling that the draft Constitutional Treaty (Article III-260) and the Hague programme (paragraph 3.2) recognise the importance of mutual evaluation between Member States in order to strengthen mutual trust, and that more appropriate tools and procedures need to be defined for the purposes of this evaluation and in order to step up exchanges of information and training opportunities in support of the quality of criminal justice in Europe,
naslavlja naslednje priporočilo na Svet:
Addresses the following recommendation to the Council:
- da ob upoštevanju vzajemnega vrednotenja, ki se že izvaja v okviru ukrepov, povezanih z bojem proti terorizmu in s sodelovanjem v okviru Schengena, določi kazalce in postopke, ki bodo omogočili vzpostavitev vzajemnega sistema vrednotenja kakovosti kazenskega sodišča držav članic;
– that it define indicators and procedures, taking due account of mutual evaluations already existing as part of measures to combat terrorism and in connection with Schengen cooperation, for the establishment of a mutual evaluation system on the quality of criminal justice in the Member States;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to priporočilo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this recommendation to the Council and, for information, to the Commission.
ki ga predlaga Andreas Mölzer
by Andreas Mölzer
o omejitvi gibanja oseb in preprečevanju množičnega priseljevanja v primeru morebitnega pristopa Turčije k EU
on measures to restrict the free movement of persons and to prevent mass immigration in the event of Turkey's accession to the EU
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o omejitvi gibanja oseb in preprečevanju množičnega priseljevanja v primeru morebitnega pristopa Turčije k EU
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on measures to restrict the free movement of persons and to prevent mass immigration in the event of Turkey's accession to the EU
ker je prebivalstvo Turčije podvrženo hitri rasti, ker bo Turčija v primeru pristopa država z največjim številom prebivalcev v EU in ker bo istočasno zelo velika brezposelnost mladih spodbudila mlade Turke v množična izseljevanja v EU,
whereas Turkey's population is increasing dramatically, whereas Turkey, should it join the Union, would become the most populous Member State, and whereas, at the same time, the country's very high youth unemployment rate would encourage mass immigration to the EU by young Turks,
ker je v številnih držav EU, zlasti v Nemčiji in Avstriji, že veliko Turkov, ki se niso pripravljeni integrirati in ker z vzpostavljanjem vzporedne družbe predstavljajo vedno večji potencial za konflikte,
whereas a number of EU Member States, in particular Germany and Austria, already have large Turkish communities which are reluctant to integrate, thereby forming parallel societies which offer increasing potential for conflict,
ker kulturni in duhovni identiteti Evrope v primeru masovnega priseljevanja muslimanov grozijo revolucionarne spremembe,
whereas the cultural and intellectual identity of Europe might undergo revolutionary changes in the event of mass Muslim immigration,
ob upoštevanju problemov na trgu delovne sile v državah EU in že sedaj obstoječe visoke brezposelnosti,
having regard to the labour market problems already facing the EU Member States and the existing high levels of unemployment,
meni, da je treba prosto gibanje oseb, v primeru morebitnega članstva Turčije v EU, odložiti za nedoločen čas, da bi preprečili množično priseljevanje; meni, da se pravica do prostega in neomejenega gibanja oseb, kot je določena v temeljnih pravicah EU, lahko Turčiji da šele, ko bodo dohodki, življenjski standard in dodana vrednost dosegli približno povprečje EU, meni, da prehodna obdobja, ki so bila določena za širitev proti vzhodu, v primeru Turčije ne bodo zadostna.
Takes the view that, in connection with the possible accession of Turkey to the EU, the free movement of persons must be suspended indefinitely in order to prevent mass immigration; takes the view, further, that the right to free, unrestricted movement of persons, as enshrined in the fundamental rights underpinning the EU, should be granted to Turkey only once income levels, living standards and real economic output in that country have reached something akin to the EU average; takes the view, finally, that the transitional periods employed in connection with the enlargement of the EU to take in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe would not be adequate in the case of Turkey.
Guido Sacconi in Dorette Corbey v imenu skupine PSE,
Guido Sacconi and Dorette Corbey on behalf of the PSE Group,
Chris Davies v imenu skupine ALDE,
Chris Davies on behalf of the ALDE Group,
Satu Hassi v imenu skupine Verts/ALE,
Satu Hassi on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group,
Jonas Sjöstedt v imenu skupine GUE/NGL,
Jonas Sjöstedt on behalf of the GUE/NGL Group,
Johannes Blokland v imenu skupine IND/DEM,
Johannes Blokland on behalf of the IND/DEM Group,
Liam Aylward, Brian Crowley in Cristiana Muscardini v imenu skupine UEN
Liam Aylward, Brian Crowley and Cristiana Muscardini on behalf of the UEN Group,
o izidu Konference o podnebnih spremembah v Buenos Airesu
on the outcome of the Buenos Aires Conference on climate change
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o izidu Konference o podnebnih spremembah v Buenos Airesu
European Parliament resolution on the outcome of the Buenos Aires Conference on climate change
ob upoštevanju Kjotskega protokola k okvirni konvenciji Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC) z dne 11. decembra 1997, izvedbenih postopkov za njegovo izvajanje, sprejetih na konferencah v Bonnu (julija 2001), Marakešu (novembra 2001), New Delhiju (novembra 2002) in Milanu (decembra 2003), ter desete konference pogodbenic (COP-10) v Buenos Airesu v Argentini od 6. do 17. decembra 2004,
having regard to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) of 11 December 1997, the application procedures for its implementation adopted at the conferences in Bonn (July 2001), Marrakech (November 2001), New Delhi (November 2002) and Milan (December 2003), and the Tenth Conference of the Parties (COP-10) in Buenos Aires, Argentina, between 6 and 17 December 2004,
ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij o spremembi podnebja, še posebej resolucije z dne 17. novembra 2004 o strategiji EU na konferenci v Buenos Airesu (COP-10) P6_TA-PROV(2004)0060. ,
having regard to its resolutions relating to climate change, notably that of 17 November 2004 on the European Union's strategy for the Buenos Aires Conference (COP-10) P6_TA-PROV(2004)0060. ,
ker so podnebne spremembe eden glavnih izzivov 21. stoletja, ker imajo negativne globalne posledice na okolje, gospodarstvo in družbo in ker se pričakuje, da bodo negativno vplivale na trajnosten razvoj in preživljanje milijonov ljudi po svetu; ker so leta 2004 prebivalstvo po vsem svetu, še posebej v najrevnejših državah, ponovno hudo prizadeli orkani, tajfuni in druge naravne nesreče, povezane z vremenom; ker se ekonomska izguba v letu 2004, poleg trpljenja ljudi in številnih žrtev, ocenjuje na rekordnih 90 milijard dolarjev;
whereas climate change is one of the major challenges of the 21st century, having significant negative global environmental, economic and social consequences, and is expected to impinge negatively on sustainable development and the livelihoods of millions of people all over the world; whereas in 2004 again, hurricanes, typhoons and other weather-related natural disasters hit populations hard throughout the world and notably in the poorest countries; whereas, besides the human suffering and the numerous casualties, the economic losses are estimated at a record level of $90 billion for 2004,
B. ker je popolno izvajanje okvirne konvencije Združenih narodov o spremembi podnebja (UNFCCC) in Kjotskega protokola temeljnega pomena pri reševanju ključnega problema podnebnih sprememb in za prihodnost svetovnega okolja;
whereas full implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol is of fundamental importance in tackling the key problem of climate change and for the future of the world's environment,
ker je UNFCCC, da bi se izognila 'nevarnemu antropogenemu poseganju' v podnebni sistem, pripravila okvir delovanja, ki temelji na stabilizaciji koncentracije toplogrednih plinov v ozračju; ker je UNFCCC stopila v veljavo 21. marca 1994 in sedaj šteje 189 pogodbenic;
whereas the UNFCCC sets out a framework for action aimed at stabilising atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases in order to avoid 'dangerous anthropogenic interference' with the climate system; whereas the UNFCCC entered into force on 21 March 1994, and now has 189 parties,
ker je do sedaj Kjotski protokol ratificiralo 132 držav in organizacij za regionalno gospodarsko povezovanje, vključno s 37 pogodbenicami iz Priloge I (kar predstavlja 61,6% emisije toplogrednih plinov Priloge 1 v letu 1990), so zato izpolnjeni pogoji, da Protokol stopi v veljavo, kar se bo zgodilo 16. februarja 2005;
whereas to date 132 countries and regional economic integration organisations have ratified the Kyoto Protocol, including 37 Annex I parties, representing 61.6% of 1990 Annex 1 greenhouse gas emissions, thereby meeting the requirements for entry into force of the Protocol, which will take place on 16 February 2005,
ker so razvite države najbolj odgovorne za emisijo toplogrednih plinov, morajo zato imeti vodilno vlogo pri procesu zmanjševanja emisije; ker Evropski parlament stalno poziva EU, da ohranja vodilno vlogo;
whereas developed countries have a major responsibility for greenhouse gas emissions and should therefore play a leading role in the process to reduce emissions; whereas the European Parliament has consistently called for the EU to maintain such a leading role,
ker so cilji Kjotskega protokola bistven pogoj globalne strategije o podnebnih spremembah, je potrebno določiti nadaljnje cilje za obdobje po letu 2012; ker se morajo globalne emisije do leta 2050 zmanjšati za polovico, da globalno segrevanje ne bo preseglo višin pred industrializacijo za več kot 2°C;
whereas the objectives of the Kyoto Protocol are an essential condition for a global strategy on climate change, but further targets need to be set for the period after 2012; whereas global emissions should be reduced by half by 2050 in order to contain global warming so that it peaks below 2°C above pre-industrialisation levels,
ker se hitro približuje leto 2012, je potrebna strategija po letu 2012 za soočanje z dolgoročnim izzivom za spodbujanje maloogljičnih virov energije, tehnologij z nizko emisijo toplogrednih plinov in obnovljivih virov energije;
whereas the year 2012 is approaching very soon, and a strategy beyond 2012 is needed to address the longer-term challenge to promote low-carbon energy sources, low greenhouse-gas-emitting technologies and renewable energy,