natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o boju proti boleznim, ki nastanejo zaradi nepravilnega prehranjevanja
on combating diseases caused by a poor diet
PE465.700v01-00 B7‑0378/2011 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o boju proti boleznim, ki nastanejo zaradi nepravilnega prehranjevanja
PE465.700v01-00 B7‑0378/2011 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on combating diseases caused by a poor diet
A. ker mediji in zdravstveni delavci vse pogosteje poročajo o porastu problema debelosti,
A. whereas attention is increasingly being drawn to the growing problem of obesity, both by the media and by the health authorities,
B. ker se danes, za razliko od preteklosti, ta bolezen pojavlja tudi pri najmlajših,
B. whereas, unlike in the past, this disease now also affects young children,
C. ker ta bolezen vpliva na življenjske pogoje in zmanjšuje obrambno sposobnost organizma pred povzročitelji bolezni,
C. whereas this disease has an adverse impact on the quality of life of sufferers and on the body's ability to defend itself against pathogens,
D. ker je treba upoštevati tudi druge bolezni, ki nastajajo zaradi nepravilnega prehranjevanja, neuravnoteženega glede maščob in sladkorja,
D. whereas a number of other diseases are caused by an unbalanced diet high in fats and sugars,
E. ker je treba upoštevati vlogo Evropske agencije za varnost hrane in Evropske fundacije za zboljšanje življenjskih in delovnih razmer,
E. having regard to the roles of the European Food Safety Authority and the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions,
1. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj spodbujata nastanek evropskega šolskega projekta o prehrambni vzgoji in uravnoteženi prehrani, ki naj prepreči nastanek bolezni zaradi nepravilnega prehranjevanja.
Calls on the Council and the Commission to support the introduction of an EU-wide programme for the provision of nutrition education in schools, promoting the benefits of a balanced diet as a means of preventing diseases caused by poor eating habits.
2011 B7-0379/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0316/2011
29.6.2011 B7-0379/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0316/2011
o prenovi madžarske ustave
on the revised Hungarian Constitution
PE465.702v01-00 B7‑0379/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o prenovi madžarske ustave
PE465.702v01-00 B7‑0379/2011 European Parliament resolution on the revised Hungarian Constitution
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 3, 4, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah v zvezi s spoštovanjem in spodbujanjem temeljnih pravic,
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), relating to the respect for, the protection and the promotion of fundamental rights,
– ob upoštevanju nove madžarske ustave, ki jo je 18. aprila 2001 sprejel državni zbor Republike Madžarske in 25. aprila podpisal madžarski predsednik, veljati pa bo začela 1. januarja 2012 (v nadaljnjem besedilu „ustava“),
– having regard to the New constitution of Hungary, adopted on 18 April 2011 by the National Assembly of the Hungarian Republic and signed by the President of Hungary on 25 April 2011, that will enter into force on 1 January 2012 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Constitution’),
– ob upoštevanju mnenj Beneške komisije za demokracijo skozi pravo Sveta Evrope št.
– having regard to the Opinions no.
CDL (2011)001 o treh pravnih vprašanjih v zvezi s procesom priprave nove madžarske ustave in CDL(2011)016 o novi madžarski ustavi,
CDL(2011)001 and CDL(2011)016 of the Venice Commission for Democracy through Law of the Council of Europe, respectively on the three legal questions arising in the process of drafting the new constitution of Hungary and on the new constitution of Hungary,
– ob upoštevanju ustnih vprašanj Evropskega parlamenta o novi madžarski ustavi ter izjav Sveta in Komisije o prenovi madžarske ustave in nadaljnje razprave, ki je potekala 8. junija,
– having regard to the Oral Questions tabled in the European Parliament on the new Hungarian Constitution and to the Council and Commission statements on the revised Hungarian constitution and following debate held on 8 June,
A. ker Evropska unija v skladu s členom 2 PEU temelji na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države ter na jasnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, kot je zapisano v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, ter na priznavanju pravne vrednosti teh pravic, svoboščin in načel, kar bo Evropska unija še dodatno podkrepila s prihodnjim pristopom k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU, and the unequivocal respect of fundamental rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the European Convention on Human Rights, and the recognition of the legal value of said rights, freedoms and principles, which is further affirmed by the upcoming accession of the EU to the ECHR,
B. ker priprava in sprejetje nove ustave sicer sodi med pristojnosti držav članic, vendar imajo države članice in države pristopnice ter Evropska unija dolžnost zagotoviti, da so vsebina in postopki v skladu z vrednotami EU, Listino temeljnih pravic, Evropsko konvencijo o človekovih pravicah ter da črka in duh sprejetih ustav nista v nasprotju s temi vrednotami in instrumenti; ker se to jasno kaže v dejstvu, da so morale številne sedanje države članice EU svoje ustave pred pristopom k EU pregledati in spremeniti ali jih prilagoditi kasnejšim zahtevam pogodb EU, zlasti na zahtevo Komisije;
B. whereas while the drafting and the adoption of a new constitution falls in the remit of Member States' competences, Member States, current and acceding, and the EU, have a duty to ensure that the contents and the processes are in conformity with EU values, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, the ECHR, and that the word and the spirit of the adopted constitutions do not contradict these values and instruments; whereas this is clearly demonstrated by the fact that a number of current EU Member States had to review and amend their constitutions to ensure accession into the EU or adapt their constitutions to subsequent EU Treaties requirements, notably upon EU Commission request,
C. ker Beneška komisija obžaluje, da so „proces oblikovanja ustave, tudi snovanje in končno sprejetje nove ustave, zaznamovali pomanjkljiva preglednost, pomanjkljiv dialog med večino in opozicijo, premalo možnosti za ustrezno javno razpravo ter zelo kratek časovni okvir Točka 144.
C. whereas, as the Venice Commission has regretted, the ‘constitution-making process, including the drafting and the final adoption of the new Constitution, has been affected by a lack of transparency, shortcomings in the dialogue between the majority and the opposition, the insufficient opportunities for an adequate public debate, and a very tight timeframe Point 144
“ ter da je „ustava splošno sprejet okvir za redne demokratične postopke ... (kar je) predpogoj za popolnoma uspešen in legitimen proces oblikovanja ustave Točka 12.
’ and that the constitution is ‘a commonly accepted framework for ordinary democratic processes…(which is) a precondition for fully successful and legitimate constitution-making process’ Point 12
, ki „mora temeljiti na čim večjem soglasju madžarske družbe“ Točka 21.
that ‘should be based on the largest consensus possible within the Hungarian society’ Point 21
D. ker so ustavo močno kritizirale domače, evropske in mednarodne nevladne organizacije ter druge organizacije, pa tudi predstavniki vlad držav članic, sprejeta pa je bila izključno na podlagi glasov poslancev iz vladajočih strank, kar pomeni, da ni bilo omenjenega političnega in družbenega soglasja,
D. whereas the Constitution has been widely criticised by national, European and international NGOs and organisations, including by representatives of Member States’ governments, and has been adopted exclusively with the votes of the deputies from the governing parties, therefore lacking the above-mentioned political and societal consensus,
E. ker je tako kot Beneška komisija zaskrbljen zaradi oslabitve sistema medsebojnega nadzora vej oblasti, zlasti določb o pooblastilih parlamentarne večine, pa tudi ustavnega sodišča ter sodišč in sodnikov kot neodvisnih garantov pravnega reda, kar bi lahko ogrozilo neodvisnost madžarskega sodstva,
E. whereas the European Parliament shares the concerns voiced by the Venice Commission, about the weakening of the system of checks and balances, particularly the provisions concerning the parliamentary majority powers and the undermining of the Constitutional Court and the courts and judges as independent guarantors of the legal order, that may put the independence of Hungarian judiciary at risk,
F. ker ustava ne določa izrecno številnih pravic in nalog, ki jih mora Madžarska spoštovati in spodbujati na podlagi svojih mednarodnih obveznosti, kot so prepoved smrtne kazni, prepoved diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmeritve, dosmrtna zaporna kazen brez možnosti pogojne izpustitve ter opustitev ali omejevanje temeljnih pravic v posebni pravni ureditvi;
F. whereas the Constitution fails to explicitly declare a number of rights and duties, which Hungary, stemming from its international obligations, is obliged to respect and promote, such as the prohibition of death penalty, the prohibition of discrimination based on sexual orientation, life imprisonment without parole and the suspension or restriction of fundamental rights in a special legal order,
G. ker ustava preko vrednot, ki so v njej zapisane, in z nejasnim izražanjem pri opredeljevanju osnovnih pojmov, kot so družina in pravica do življenja od trenutka spočetja, vzpostavlja tveganje za diskriminacijo nekaterih skupin v družbi, t.j. etničnih, verskih in spolnih manjšin, enostarševskih družin, oseb, ki živijo v registriranem partnerstvu, in žensk,
G. whereas the Constitution, through the values set out in it as well as unclear wording when defining basic notions such as "family" and the right to life from the moment of conception, carries the risk of discrimination against certain groups in the society, namely ethnic, religious and sexual minorities, single-parent families, people living in civil union and women,
H. ker ustava ne vsebuje izrecnih jamstev, da Madžarska spoštuje ozemeljsko celovitost drugih držav, pomanjkanje teh določb in hkrati nejasno besedilo preambule, zlasti tistih delov o obveznosti Madžarske kot države do madžarskih etničnih pripadnikov v tujini, pa bi lahko ustvarilo pravno podlago za ukrepe, ki bi jih sosednje države opredelile kot poseg v njihove notranje zadeve, kar bi lahko vodilo k naraščanju napetosti v tem delu Evrope,
H. whereas the Constitution does not explicitly guarantee that Hungary respects the territorial integrity of other countries, and the lack of this provision together with the unclear wording of the preamble, particularly the parts concerning the Hungarian state's obligations towards ethnic Hungarians living abroad may create a legal basis for actions that neighbouring countries would consider as meddling into their internal matters, which may lead to tensions in the region,
I. ker ustava določa, da je njena preambula pravno veljavna, kar bi lahko imelo pravne in politične posledice ter vzpostavilo pravno negotovost, vključitev Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah pa lahko privede do prekrivanja pristojnosti med madžarskimi in mednarodnimi sodišči, na kar je v svojem mnenju opozorila Beneška komisija,
I. whereas the Constitution provides its Preamble with legal significance, which may have legal and political implications and may lead to legal uncertainty and whereas the incorporation of the European Charter of Fundamental rights may cause overlapping competences between Hungarian and international courts, as pointed out in the opinion issued by the Venice Commission,
J. ker ustava poziva k sprejetju več kot 30 t. i. temeljnih zakonov, za katere je tudi potrebna ustavna dvotretjinska večina, kar bo povzročilo vrsto pomislekov v zvezi z institucionalnim sistemov Madžarske, izvajanjem temeljnih pravic ter kulturne, verske, družbenoekonomske in finančne politike, saj se politika na teh področjih tako dejansko sprejema v okviru ustavnega procesa; ker ustava določa, da je njena preambula pravno veljavna, kar bi lahko imelo pravne in politične posledice ter povzročilo pravno negotovost,
J. whereas the Constitution calls for the adoption of over 30 of so-called cardinal laws, also subject to constitutional majority of 2/3, which will stipulate a great range of issues concerning the institutional system of Hungary, the application of fundamental rights, as well as cultural, religious, socio-economic and financial policies, which practically makes their adoption a part of the constitutional process, and whereas the Constitution provides its Preamble with legal significance, which may have legal and political implications and may lead to legal uncertainty,
K. ker bodo po ustavi številna vprašanja, kot so posebne določbe družinskega prava ter osnovne določbe davčnega in pokojninskega sistema, ki običajno spadajo v področje vladne pristojnosti ali pa so zajete v rednih pooblastilih zakonodajnega organa za odločanje, prav tako urejali temeljni zakoni, kar pomeni, da bodo v prihodnosti volitve manj pomembne, dvotretjinska večina pa bo lahko utrdila svoje politične težnje, zato lahko urejanje specifičnih in podrobnih določb s temeljnimi zakonodajnimi dokumenti ogrozi načelo demokratičnosti,
K. whereas, according to the Constitution a number of issues, such as specific rules of family legislation and the basic rules of the tax and pension systems, which normally fall under the competence of the government or the regular decision of the legislative body, will also have to be regulated by cardinal laws, tying the hands of any future government not having a two-third majority and diminishing the significance of future elections and more possibilities for a two-third majority to cement their political preferences, thus regulating specific and detailed rules by cardinal acts can put the principle of democracy at risk,
L. ker kulturna, verska, družbenoekonomska in finančna politika ne bi smela biti uzakonjena s temeljnim zakonom, kot je poudarila Beneška komisija,
L. whereas, as underlined by the Venice Commission, cultural, religious, socio-economic and financial policies should not be cemented in a cardinal law,
M. ker bo imel proračunski svet, neparlamentarni organ z omejeno demokratično legitimnostjo, pravico veta na sprejetje splošnega proračuna v državnem zboru, pri čemer lahko predsednik države razpusti državni zbor in s tem močno omeji delovanje demokratično izvoljenega zakonodajnega organa; ker bo učinkoviti sistem štirih parlamentarnih komisarjev zmanjšan na enega splošnega varuha človekovih pravic in dva namestnika, s čimer morda ne bo zagotovljena enaka raven varstva pravic in ne bodo zajeta pooblastila nekdanjega komisarja za varstvo osebnih podatkov in svobodo obveščanja, katerega pristojnosti bodo prenesene na organ, čigar delovanje ni podrobno opredeljeno,
M. whereas a non-parliamentary body, the Budget Council, with limited democratic legitimacy, will have the power to veto the adoption of the general budget by the National Assembly, in which case the Head of State can dissolve it, severely restricting the action of the democratically elected legislature; whereas the well-functioning system of four parliamentary commissioners will be reduced to one general ombudsman and two deputies, which may not provide the same level of protection of rights and will not include the competencies of the former Commissioner for Personal Data and Freedom of Information; the competencies of the latter will be transferred to an authority whose functioning is not specified,
N. ker so madžarska vlada in vladajoče stranke vzporedno s sprejetjem nove ustave izvedle obsežne zamenjave na ključnih pozicijah ter tako na primer imenovale novega generalnega pravobranilca, predsednika državnega revizijskega urada in predsednika proračunskega sveta; ker bo v skladu z novo ustavo sedanji mandat predsednika vrhovnega sodišča potekel, novega predsednika pa bo neposredno izvolil madžarski parlament, v katerem imajo vladajoče stranke dvotretjinsko večino; poleg tega so vodilne stranke pravkar predlagale in izvolile pet članov ustavnega sodišča,
N. whereas in parallel with the adoption of the new Constitution the government of Hungary and the governing parties carried out large scale replacements in key positions, such as the new attorney general, the President of the State Audit Office, the president of the Budget Council; whereas according to the new constitution, the current term of the President of the Supreme Court will cease and the new President of the Curia, will be elected directly by the Hungarian Parliament, in which the governing parties have a two-third majority, and whereas five members of the Constitutional Court have just been proposed and elected by the governing parties,
O. ker je parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope sklenila, da bo pripravila poročilo o ustavi, pri čemer bo upoštevala tudi mnenje Beneške komisije,
O. whereas the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe has decided to prepare a report on the Constitution, including on the basis of the opinion of the Venice Commission,
P. ker vladajoče stranke v svojem volilnem programu niso omenjale priprave in sprejetja nove ustave,
P. whereas the drafting and the adoption of a new constitution was not mentioned in the electoral program of the governing parties,
Q. ker je generalni sekretar Organizacije združenih narodov Ban Ki Moon izrazil željo, da bi madžarska vlada zaprosila za nasvet in priporočila madžarskih strokovnjakov in Sveta Evrope ali Združenih narodov, ter meni, da bi morala Madžarska kot država članica Evropske unije evropske institucije zaprositi za nasvet v zvezi z ustavo in za njen pregled,
Q. whereas the Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr Ban-ki Moon stated that ‘he would appreciate if the Hungarian government sought advice and recommendations from within the country and from the Council of Europe or the United Nations’ and thinks that Hungary, as a member state of the European Union, should address the European institutions for advices and a review of the Constitution,
R. ker je madžarski predsednik vlade Viktor Orbán izrazil pripravljenost za predložitev nove ustave v pregled;
R. whereas the Prime Minister of Hungary, Viktor Orbán has declared his readiness to submit the Constitution for such a review,
5. poziva madžarske oblasti, naj ustavo spremenijo, vključno s preambulo, tako da bo izrecno jamčila, da Madžarska v povezavi z madžarskimi etničnimi pripadniki, ki živijo v tujini, spoštuje ozemeljsko celovitost drugih držav;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to amend the Constitution, including its preamble, so that it explicitly guarantees that Hungary respects the territorial integrity of other countries in relation to ethnic Hungarians living abroad;
8. poziva madžarske oblasti, naj zagotovijo, da vključitev Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah ne bo povzročila težav pri razlagi in prekrivanja pristojnosti domačih sodišč, ustavnega sodišča in Sodišča Evropske unije;
Calls on the Hungarian authorities to make sure that the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights does not cause problems of interpretation and overlapping competences between domestic courts, the Constitutional Court and the European Court of Justice;
11. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, Svetu Evrope, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, Agenciji za temeljne pravice, OVSE in Organizaciji združenih narodov.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Council of Europe, the governments and parliaments of Member States, the Fundamental Rights Agency, the OSCE and the United Nations Organisation.
2011 B7-0380/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0316/2011
29.6.2011 B7-0380/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0316/2011
PE465.705v01-00 B7‑0380/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o prenovi madžarske ustave
PE465.705v01-00 B7‑0380/2011 European Parliament resolution on the revised Hungarian Constitution
– ob upoštevanju členov 2, 3, 4, 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), členov 49, 56, 114, 167 in 258 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropske konvencije o človekovih pravicah, ki obravnavajo spoštovanje in spodbujanje temeljnih pravic,
– having regard to Articles 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Articles 49, 56, 114, 167 and 258 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which deal with respect for and the promotion and protection of fundamental rights,
– ob upoštevanju madžarskega temeljnega zakona, ki ga je 18. aprila 2011 sprejel državni zbor Republike Madžarske (v nadaljevanju „nova ustava“),
– having regard to the Basic Law of Hungary, adopted on 18 April 2011 by the National Assembly of the Hungarian Republic (hereinafter referred to as ‘the new Constitution’),
– ob upoštevanju predloga resolucije št. 12490 o resnem nazadovanju na področju pravne države in človekovih pravic na Madžarskem, ki je bila 25. januarja 2011 vložena v Parlamentarni skupščini Sveta Evrope,
– having regard to motion for resolution No 12490 on serious setbacks in the fields of the rule of law and human rights in Hungary tabled on 25 January 2011 in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe,
– ob upoštevanju sodbe št. 30141/04 Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice (Schalk in Kopf proti Avstriji), zlasti njenih postranskih razlogov,
– having regard to ruling No 30141/04 of the European Court of Human Rights (Schalk and Kopf v Austria), and in particular its obiter dicta ,
A. ker Evropska unija temelji na vrednotah demokracije in pravne države, kot je določeno v členu 2 PEU, na jasnem spoštovanju temeljnih pravic in svoboščin, kot je zapisano v Listini Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah in Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah, ter na priznavanju pravne vrednosti teh pravic, svoboščin in načel, kar bo Evropska unija še dodatno podkrepila z bližnjim pristopom k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah,
A. whereas the European Union is founded on the values of democracy and the rule of law, as stipulated in Article 2 TEU, on unequivocal respect for fundamental rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in the ECHR, and on the recognition of the legal value of said rights, freedoms and principles, which is further demonstrated by the EU’s forthcoming accession to the ECHR,
B. ker je neobičajno, da se novo ustavo pripravi in sprejme po pristopu k EU, in ker je treba kljub temu, da imajo države članice izključno pravico priprave in sprejetja nove ustave, na ravni Evropske unije nameniti posebno pozornost obliki teh dokumentov in postopkom, ki se uporabljajo, da sprejeta ustava ne bi bila v nasprotju s črko in duhom pravnega reda Evropske unije.
B. whereas the drafting and the adoption of a new constitution after EU accession is an unusual phenomenon, and whereas, although Member States have the exclusive right to draft and adopt new constitutions, particular attention should be paid at EU level to the form of the documents concerned and to the processes involved, so as to ensure that the letter and spirit of the adopted constitutions do not contradict the letter and spirit of the acquis communautaire ,