natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Evropska unija je v tem procesu sodelovala že od samega začetka in je v njem odigrala zelo aktivno vlogo ter dosegla, da so bile v konvencijo vključene nekatere obveznosti, ki so sicer še vedno skromne, vendar pomenijo izboljšavo v primerjavi z drugimi regionalnimi organizacijami za upravljanje ribištva, zlasti WCPFC.
It has played a very active role, thanks to which some obligations have been included in the text of the Convention which, though modest, are still an improvement on other RFMOs, and more specifically the WCPFC.
Dogovor o končnem besedilu te konvencije je bil dosežen novembra 2009 in konvencija je bila pripravljena za podpis 1. februarja 2010.
The text of the Convention was finally agreed in November 2009 and opened for signature on 1 February 2010.
EU jo je v skladu s sklepom Sveta o tem z dne 24. julija 2010 podpisala 26. julija 2010.
The EU signed on 26 July 2010 in accordance with the Council Decision thereon of 24 July 2010.
Konvencijo morajo zdaj vse podpisnice ratificirati in namen tega zakonodajnega akta je omogočiti ratifikacijo v EU prek osnutka sklepa Sveta.
The Convention is now in the process of ratification by the parties and the purpose of this legislative act is to allow ratification by the EU through a draft Council Decision.
Da bo lahko začela veljati, jo mora ratificirati 8 zainteresiranih strani, od tega tri države s tihomorsko obalo in tri države brez nje.
8 ratifications by interested parties, including 3 from coastal States and 3 from non-coastal States, are required for the Convention to enter fully into force.
Med pripravo tega osnutka priporočila so konvencijo že ratificirale tri države, ki nimajo tihomorske obale, namreč Belize, Kuba in Danska (v imenu Ferskih otokov), in ena država s takšno obalo, Cookovi otoki.
At the time of writing this draft recommendation, it had already been ratified by three non-coastal States: Belize, Cuba and Denmark (on behalf of the Faroe Islands), and by one coastal State, the Cook Islands.
Proces oblikovanja SPRFMO je povzet v predlogu Sveta, zato se mu poročevalka ne bo več posvečala, čeprav samo branje o tem procesu ne ustvari prave slike o štiriletnih prizadevanjih pogajalcev EU, da bi dosegli nekoliko strožje zahteve, kot jih vsebuje Konvencija ZN o ohranjanju in upravljanju čezconskih staležev rib in izrazito selitvenih staležev rib iz leta 1982.
The process of shaping the SPRFMO is summarised in the Council proposal, and the rapporteur will spend no more time on it, although reading the process gives no idea of the four years of struggles that the EU negotiators went through to go a little bit further than the strict terms of the 1982 UN Convention on Straddling and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks.
Poročevalka želi najprej poudariti, da večina držav v svojih vodah še vedno ni pripravljena uvesti ukrepov za upravljanje v skladu z mednarodnim pravom.
The first thought that comes to the rapporteur is to highlight to what extent the majority of States are still unwilling to accept management measures in line with international law in their waters.
Pravo razočaranje je tudi, da se ta odpor pojavlja v regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva pod vodstvom držav, ki veljajo za zglede dobre ribolovne prakse ali pa vsaj želijo narediti tak vtis – kot so Avstralija, Nova Zelandija in Čile – in ki so tudi gonilne sile nove regionalne organizacije za upravljanje ribištva.
And it is totally demoralising to find this resistance exemplified in RFMOs headed by countries that are supposedly – or so they would have you believe – champions of good fishing practice, such as Australia, New Zealand or Chile, the driving forces behind this new RFMO.
Dejstvo, da nobena od teh držav konvencije še ni ratificirala (čeprav so bile njene pobudnice) in da v splošnem ratifikacija traja dlje v državah, ki imajo obale na območju, ki ga konvencija zadeva, je še toliko bolj skrb zbujajoče.
The fact that none of these three countries have yet ratified the Convention (despite having taken the initiative) and that ratification in general is taking longest in the countries with coasts in the area covered by the Convention gives further cause for concern.
Vse to tudi kaže, kako resno je EU – kljub nenehnim samokritikam – posvojila zamisel o odgovornem svetovnem upravljanju in se v tem stališču še nadalje oddaljuje od držav, kot sta Avstralija in Nova Zelandija.
This also shows to what extent, despite our repeated self-criticism, the EU has already taken on board the idea of responsible global management, a viewpoint where it seems that Europe is starting to move further apart from countries like Australia and New Zealand.
Poročevalka meni, da je to treba poudariti.
The rapporteur considers this a point that needs to be made.
Na območju južnega Tihega oceana so poleg ladij EU dejansko navzoča ribiška plovila devetih držav (Belize, Čile, Kitajska, Cookovi otoki, Ferski otoki, Koreja, Peru, Vanuatu in Ruska federacija).
Fishing fleets from nine countries (Belize, Chile, China, Cook Islands, Faroe Islands, Korea, Peru, Vanuatu and the Russian Federation), in addition to the EU, are currently present in the area.
Dokler konvencija ne bo začela v celoti veljati, so pogodbenice sprejele začasni sporazum o ukrepih v zvezi z ribolovom pelagičnih vrst, ki določa celoten dovoljeni ulov za vsako posamezno stranko in ribolovni napor omejuje na določeno raven.
Up until the full entry into force of the Convention, the Contracting Parties have adopted an interim agreement on measures for fishing pelagic species which sets the total allowable catch (TAC) for each party and freezes fishing effort within specified limits.
Glede na znanstvena poročila je bilo zmanjšanje staležev šura v zadnjih letih skrb zbujajoče, kar je vplivalo na raven dodeljenih ribolovnih možnosti.
According to scientific reports, the horse mackerel population has fallen alarmingly in recent years, and this has determined the level of fishing opportunities allocated.
V skladu z znanstvenim poročilom za leto 2011 je celoten dovoljeni ulov za EU 40.000 ton, največji dovoljeni ribolovni napor pa 78.600 GT.
In accordance with the scientific report for 2011, the EU has a TAC of 40 000 tonnes and a maximum fishing effort of 78 600 GT.
Podatki o biomasi bodo znova revidirani oktobra, toda po napovedih naj bi ribolovne možnosti v najboljšem primeru ostale nespremenjene.
The biomass data will be reviewed again in October, but it is forecast that fishing opportunities will, at best, remain unchanged.
Ribolovne možnosti EU bi slednji dopuščale, da lovi s kakimi desetimi ladjami, poleg dveh do štirih, ki ponavadi lovijo v tej regiji, vendar se v vsakem primeru ocenjuje, da bi bilo takšno navzočnost zaradi oddaljenosti od domačih pristanišč zelo težko ohranjati, čeprav bi vseh deset ladij prejelo ribiško dovoljenje.
Whilst the EU’s fishing opportunities would allow fishing by about 10 vessels, on top of the 2-4 Community vessels that usually fish in the region, it is in any case considered that, even if fishing applications were received up to this maximum limit of 10 vessels, it would be difficult to maintain a simultaneous presence in view of the distance from their ports of origin.
Ker se konvencija nanaša na ribolov čezconskih staležev na tem območju, kot je šur, ima poročevalka pomisleke zaradi člena 20(4)(a), zlasti alinee (iii).
Given that the Convention covers the fishing of straddling stocks in the area, such as horse mackerel, the rapporteur is concerned about Article 20(4)(a), and in particular indent (iii).
Konvencija načeloma določa, da bo njena komisija za vse ribolovne vire opredelila celoten dovoljeni ulov oziroma največji dovoljeni ribolovni napor.
In principle, the Convention stipulates that its Commission will establish TACs or total allowable fishing effort for a given resource throughout the range of the fishery resource.
Alinea (iii) pa kljub temu dopušča, da lahko pogodbenica, ki ima obalo na zadevnem območju, v svojih vodah določi drugi celotni dovoljeni ulov, če se ne strinja z opredeljenim.
However, under indent (iii) if a coastal State Contracting Party does not agree with this TAC, it is free to establish another TAC in its waters.
V primeru čezconskih staležev bi ta možnost izogibanja obveznostim lahko takoj izničila smisel zadevnega upravljavskega ukrepa.
In the case of straddling stocks, this ability to escape from the obligation could immediately defeat the point of the management measure in question.
Kljub vsemu je bil dosežen določen uspeh s tem, da je bil v člen 20 vključen odstavek 5, ki konvencijo pooblašča za sprejetje izrednih ukrepov, če oceni, da bi utegnila določena ribolovna dejavnost močno ogroziti staleže.
There was, however, some success in the inclusion in Article 20 of paragraph 5 which allows the Convention to apply emergency measures if the Convention considers that fishing activity may present a serious threat to the resource.
Kakšne rezultate lahko ta rešitev prinese, se bo šele izkazalo, saj so izredni ukrepi samo začasni, nedvomno pa gre za korak naprej, ki je zelo dobrodošel.
It remains to be seen what the outcome of this solution may be since the emergency measures can only be of a temporary nature, but it is undoubtedly a step in the right direction which is very welcome.
Med pogajanji o besedilu je EU uspelo zagotoviti tudi dodatna jamstva glede postopka ugovora.
When negotiating the text, the EU also managed to obtain additional guarantees regarding the objection procedure.
Drugače kot pri drugih regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva pri tej konvenciji ne zadostuje, da pogodbenica preprosto ugovarja ukrepu, da bi se izognila njegovemu izvajanju, ampak je postopek ugovora veliko strožji in omejuje razloge za ugovor; še bolj pomembno pa je, da mora država, ki vloži ugovor, sprejeti nadomestne ukrepe z enakim učinkom.
Unlike in other RFMOs, it is not enough for a Party simply to object to a measure in order to circumvent its application, and the objection procedure in this case is much more stringent, limiting the reasons that may give rise to an objection and, more importantly, obliging the State presenting an objection to adopt alternative measures that are equivalent in effect to the decision to which it has objected.
Besedilo tudi zagotavlja dostop plovil ene od pogodbenic do pristanišč drugih pogodbenic konvencije, kar bi vsaj odprlo vrata čilskih pristanišč za pelagično floto Unije.
The text also seems to guarantee access for the vessels of one Contracting Party to the ports of other States that are party to the Convention, which would at least open up access to Chile’s ports for the Community pelagic fleet.
Glede na velik odpor obalnih držav na tem območju do uporabe mednarodnih ukrepov v izključnih ekonomskih conah poročevalka meni, da prednosti konvencije odtehtajo njene pomanjkljivosti.
Finally, given the huge resistance by coastal States in this part of the world to applying international management measures inside their EEZ, the rapporteur considers that the points in favour of the Convention outweigh those against.
V vsakem primeru vztraja pri stališču, da bi morala biti EU navzoča v vseh regionalnih organizacijah za upravljanje ribištva, tako zato, da bi branila svoje prednostne naloge v zvezi s trajnostnim upravljanjem ribolova, kakršnega si zamišlja, kot zato, da bi branila interese svoje flote, po potrebi pa bi delovala kot protiutež in zagotovila, da ne bo prihajalo do izogibanja boju proti nezakonitemu, nereguliranemu in neprijavljenemu ribolovu.
In any case, she stands by her position that the EU should have a presence within all RFMOs, both to defend its priorities concerning its views on what sustainable fisheries management should entail, and to defend the interests of its fishing fleet, acting, if necessary, as a counterweight to ensure that there are no possible attempts to circumvent efforts to combat IUU fishing.
Datum sprejetja
Date a dopted
o izvajanju direktive o mediaciji v državah članicah, njenem vplivu na mediacijo in sprejetju s strani sodišč
on the implementation of the directive on mediation in the Member States, its impact on mediation and its take-up by the courts
– ob upoštevanju členov 67 in 81(2)(g) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Articles 67 and 81(2)(g) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 23. aprila 2008 o skupnem stališču Sveta za sprejetje direktive o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
– having regard to its resolution of 23 April 2008 on the Council common position for adopting a directive on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
UL C 259E, 29.10.2009, str.
OJ C 259E, 29.10.2009, p.122. ,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2008/52/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 21. maja 2008 o nekaterih vidikih mediacije v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah
– having regard to Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters
UL L 136, 24.5.2008, str.
OJ L 136 24.05.2008, p.3. ,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0275/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0275/2011 ),
A. ker je zagotavljanje boljšega dostopa do sodnega varstva eden od ključnih ciljev politike Evropske unije za vzpostavitev območja svobode, varnosti in pravice; ker bi pojem dostopa do sodnega varstva v tem kontekstu moral vključevati tudi dostop do ustreznih postopkov za reševanje sporov za fizične osebe in podjetja,
A. whereas securing better access to justice is one of the key objectives of the European Union’s policy to establish an area of freedom, security and justice; whereas the concept of access to justice should, in this context, include access to adequate dispute resolution processes for individuals and businesses,
B. ker je cilj Direktive 2008/52/ES spodbujanje mirnega reševanja sporov s spodbujanjem uporabe mediacije in z zagotavljanjem uravnoteženega odnosa med mediacijo in sodnimi postopki,
B. whereas the objective of Directive 2008/52/EC is to promote the amicable settlement of disputes by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings,
C. ker direktiva za olajšanje dostopa do mediacije kot ustrezne alternative tradicionalnemu kontradiktornemu pristopu in za zagotovitev, da lahko stranke, ki izkoristijo možnost mediacije, v Evropski uniji računajo na predvidljiv zakonodajni okvir, uvaja skupna načela zlasti v zvezi z vidiki civilnopravnega postopka,
C. whereas in order to facilitate access to mediation as a viable alternative to the traditional adversarial approach and to ensure that parties having recourse to mediation in the European Union benefit from predictable framework legislation, the Directive introduces common principles addressing, in particular, aspects of civil procedure,
D. ker je poleg predvidljivosti namen direktive oblikovati okvir, ki bi ohranil prilagodljivost kot glavno prednost mediacije; ker naj bi države članice pri oblikovanju nacionalnih zakonov za izvajanje direktive izhajale iz teh dveh zahtev,
D. whereas, besides predictability, the Directive aims to establish a framework that preserves the main advantage of mediation, flexibility; whereas these two requirements should guide Member States when drawing up national laws implementing the Directive,
E. ker je Direktiva 2008/52/ES zanimiva tudi za sosednje države in je dokazljivo vplivala na uvedbo podobne zakonodaje v nekaterih od teh držav,
E. whereas Directive 2008/52/EC has also been of interest to neighbouring States and has had a demonstrable influence on the introduction of similar legislation in some of these countries,
F. ker se morajo države članice uskladiti s to direktivo do 21. maja 2011, z izjemo člena 10, s katerim se je bilo treba uskladiti že do 21. novembra 2010; ker je doslej večina držav članic poročala o tem, da je opravila postopek prenosa ali ga bo do postavljenega roka, in ker le nekaj držav članic še ni poročalo o uskladitvi z določbami direktive: Republika Češka, Avstrija, Finska in Švedska,
F. whereas the Member States are required to comply with this Directive before 21 May 2011, with the exception of Article 10, for which the date of compliance was 21 November 2010; whereas so far the majority of Member States have reported that they have completed the implementation process or will complete it by the deadline, and only a few Member States have not yet reported compliance with the Directive’s provisions: the Czech Republic, Austria, Finland and Sweden,
G. ker Evropski parlament meni, da je pomembno preučiti, kako se ta zakonodajni akt izvaja v državah članicah, kaj pravniki in uporabniki mediacije o njej mislijo ter ali bi jo bilo mogoče izboljšati in kako,
G. whereas the European Parliament considers it important to examine how this piece of legislation has been implemented by the Member States, to see what practitioners and users of mediation think of it and to identify whether and how it could be improved,
H. ker bi bilo treba s tem namenom opraviti temeljito analizo glavnih regulativnih pristopov držav članic, da se opredelijo dobre prakse in dosežejo zaključki o nadaljnjih ukrepih na evropski ravni,
H. whereas, for this purpose, a thorough analysis of the main regulatory approaches of the Member States should be conducted in order to identify good practices and draw conclusions about any further action at European level,
I. ker Akcijski načrt Komisije za uresničevanje Stockholmskega programa (KOM (2010) 171 konč.) predvideva sporočilo o izvajanju direktive o mediaciji v letu 2013,
I. whereas the Commission’s Action Plan for implementing the Stockholm Programme (COM(2010)171 final) foresees a Communication on the implementation of the mediation directive in 2013,
J. ker je vredno preučiti, kako so države članice prenesle glavne določbe direktive o mediaciji v zvezi z možnostjo sodišč, da predlagajo mediacijo neposredno strankam (člen 5), jamstvom zaupnosti (člen 7), izvršljivostjo sporazumov, ki so rezultat mediacije (člen 6) in učinkom mediacije na roke in zastaranje (člen 8),
J. whereas it is worth considering how Member States have implemented the main provisions of the Mediation Directive regarding the possibility for the courts to suggest mediation directly to the parties (Article 5), the guarantee of confidentiality (Article 7), the enforceability of agreements resulting from mediation (Article 6) and the effect of mediation on limitation and prescription periods (Article 8),
K. ker je Komisija v svoj delovni program za leto 2011 vključila zakonodajni predlog o alternativnem reševanju sporov,
K. whereas the Commission has included in its Work Programme for 2011 a legislative proposal on Alternative Dispute Resolution,
3. meni, da je člen 8, ki obravnava učinke mediacije na roke in zastaranje, bistvena določba, saj zagotavlja, da strankam, ki se odločijo, da bodo poskušale z mediacijo rešiti spor, ni zaradi tega kasneje preprečeno, da poiščejo sodno varstvo; ugotavlja, da države članice v zvezi s tem niso odprle nobenega vprašanja;
Takes the view that Article 8, which deals with the effects of mediation on limitation and prescription periods, is an essential provision in that it ensures that parties who choose mediation in an attempt to settle a dispute are not subsequently prevented from having their day in court as a result of the time spent in mediation; notes that no particular issue seems to have been raised by Member States in relation to this point;
5. priznava, da člen 5(2) državam članicam dovoljuje, da predpišejo obvezno mediacijo oziroma da zanjo predpišejo spodbude ali sankcije, bodisi med sodnim postopkom ali pred njegovim začetkom, pod pogojem, da to strankam ne preprečuje dostopa do sodnega varstva;
Acknowledges that Article 5(2) allows Member States to make the use of mediation compulsory or subject to incentives or sanctions, whether before or after judicial proceedings have started, provided that this does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the courts;
7. ugotavlja, da so se poleg finančnih spodbud nekatere države članice s preobremenjenim sodstvom zatekle k določbam, po katerih je mediacija obvezna; ugotavlja, da v teh primerih ni mogoče vložiti tožbe pred sodiščem, če stranki najprej ne poskusita zadeve rešiti z mediacijo;
Observes that, alongside the financial incentives, certain Member States whose judicial systems are overburdened have resorted to rules making recourse to mediation compulsory; notes that in such cases disputes cannot be filed in court until the parties have first attempted to resolve the issues by mediation;
10. ugotavlja, da se zdi, da mediacija v italijanskem pravnem sistemu dosega cilj zmanjšanja obremenjenosti sodišč; kljub temu poudarja, da bi bilo treba mediacijo spodbujati kot sprejemljivo, poceni in hitrejšo alternativno obliko zagotavljanja pravičnosti, ne pa kot obvezen vidik sodnega postopka;
Observes that compulsory mediation appears to be achieving the objective in the Italian legal system by relieving congestion in the courts; nevertheless stresses that mediation should be promoted as a viable, low-cost and quicker alternative form of justice rather than a compulsory aspect of the judicial procedure;
13. ob upoštevanju zgoraj povedanega meni, da so države članice večinoma na pravi poti za prenos direktive 2008/52/ES do 21. maja 2011 in da kljub temu, da imajo države članice različne regulativne pristope ter da nekatere države nekoliko zaostajajo, ostaja dejstvo, da države članice ne delujejo le v skladu z direktivo, temveč presegajo njene zahteve;
Believes that, in the light of all of the foregoing, the Member States are, as a whole, largely on track to implement Directive 2008/52/EC by 21 May 2011 and that, while Member States are using varied regulatory approaches and some states are a little behind, the fact remains that most Member States are not only compliant, but are in fact ahead of the Directive’s requirements;
15. spodbuja Komisijo, naj v svojem prihodnjem sporočilu o izvajanju Direktive 2008/52/ES preuči tudi tista področja, na katera so države članice razširile njene ukrepe, čeprav jih direktiva ni nameravala zajeti;
Encourages the Commission, in its forthcoming Communication on the implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC, also to examine those areas where Member States have chosen to extend the measures of the Directive beyond its intended scope;
18. verjame, da sta potrebna večja ozaveščenost in razumevanje mediacije, zato poziva k nadaljnjim ukrepom za izobraževanje in ozaveščanje o mediaciji, spodbujanje njene uporabe pri podjetjih in določitev zahtev za pridobitev poklica mediatorja;
Believes that there is a need for increased awareness and understanding of mediation, and calls for further action relating to education, growing awareness of mediation, enhancing mediation uptake by businesses and requirements for access to the profession of mediator;
20. priznava pomen oblikovanja skupnih standardov za pridobitev poklica mediatorja, s čimer bi prispevali h kakovosti mediacije ter zagotovili visoke standarde poklicnega usposabljanja in akreditacije v vsej Uniji;
Acknowledges the importance of establishing common standards for accessing the profession of mediator in order to promote a better quality of mediation and to ensure high standards of professional training and accreditation across the Union;
o predlogu sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma v obliki izmenjave pisem med Evropsko unijo in Kraljevino Norveško o dodatnih trgovinskih preferencialih za kmetijske proizvode, doseženega na podlagi člena 19 Sporazuma o Evropskem gospodarskem prostoru
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products reached on the basis of Article 19 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area
MNENJE ODBORA ZA KMETIJSTVO IN RAZVOJ PODEŽELJA .........................................8
OPINION of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development .....8
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (14206/2010),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (14206/2010),