natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Kot kažejo nedavni incidenti (na primer eksplozivna kartuša za računalnik v Jemnu oktobra 2010 in radiološka bomba v Genovi februarja 2011), morajo ostati carinski organi budni, saj vedno prihaja do ogrožanja varnosti.
As the latest incidents show (e.g. Yemen cartridge bomb (October 2010) and dirty bomb fears in Genoa (February 2011)) customs authorities have to remain vigilant as threats to security are imminent.
Poročevalec je prepričan, da so carinski organi najbolj primerni za zagotavljanje, da na trg EU vstopajo samo varni izdelki in blago, ki je skladno z zakonodajo EU o skladnosti ter ki izpolnjuje zahteve o dokumentaciji in označevanju.
The Rapporteur is persuaded that customs administrations are best placed to ensure that only safe goods and goods complying with EU harmonisation legislation and fulfilling documentation and marking requirements enter the EU.
Zato meni, da imajo ti organi poglavitno vlogo pri zagotavljanju varnosti izdelkov.
Therefore the Rapporteur trusts that there is a crucial role for customs to play in ensuring product safety.
Slednje je 8. marca 2011 posebej poudaril tudi Parlament v svoji resoluciji o reviziji direktive o splošni varnosti proizvodov in nadzoru trga.
The latter point has also been highlighted in European Parliament resolution of 8 March 2011 on the revision of the General Product Safety Directive and market surveillance.
Zaščita finančnih interesov EU
Protection of financial interests of the EU
Bistveno je zaščititi finančne interese EU in preprečiti izgubo prihodkov.
It is also crucial to safeguard the financial interests of the EU and to prevent losses in revenue.
Poleg tega plačevanje prenizkih carin in podcenjevanje uvoženega blaga ogroža delovanje notranjega trga.
Moreover, underpayment of customs duties and undervaluation of imported goods jeopardise the functioning of the internal market.
Varstvo pravic intelektualne lastnine
Protection of intellectual property rights
Poročevalec pozdravlja nedavni predlog Komisije za osnutek uredbe o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine s strani carinskih organov ter za uredbo, s katero bi nekatere naloge v zvezi z varstvom pravic intelektualne lastnine prepustili Uradu za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli).
The Rapporteur welcomes recent Commission’s proposals for a draft regulation concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and for a draft regulation on entrusting the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) with certain tasks related to the protection of intellectual property rights.
Poročevalec poudarja, da je potrebno sodelovanje med carinskimi organi, pa tudi njihovo sodelovanje s trgovci in drugimi državnimi organi, zato močno podpira usklajeno upravljanje meja, načelo enotnega okenca, koncept vse na enem mestu in centralizirano carinjenje.
The Rapporteur stresses the need to ensure cooperation among customs authorities, as well as between customs authorities and traders, customs authorities and other governmental authorities and in that respect strongly supports the coordinated border management, single window principle, one-stop-shop concept and centralised customs clearance.
Poročevalec predlaga ustanovitev evropske carinske agencije, da bi obravnavala vprašanja s tega področja.
The Rapporteur also proposes to establish European Customs Agency to deal with customs issues.
o posodobitvi carine
on the modernisation of customs
2. poziva Komisijo, naj ohrani člen 24 carinskega zakonika Skupnosti, da se bo izvor blaga še naprej določal po kraju, kjer je potekala zadnja pomembna, gospodarsko upravičena predelava ali obdelava; hkrati poudarja, da mora EU tudi v prihodnje priznavati potrdila o izvozu ustreznih organov tretjih držav o nepreferencialnem izvoru; poudarja, da bi spremembe sedanjega stanja obremenile podjetja z upravnimi postopki in ovirale prizadevanja za uskladitev, ki potekajo na ravni Svetovne trgovinske organizacije;
Calls on the Commission to maintain Article 24 of the Community Customs Code, so that the origin of goods continues to be determined according to the place where their last substantial economically justified processing occurred; at the same time stresses that export certificates on non-preferential origin of the relevant authorities of third countries must also in future be recognised by the EU; stresses that changes to the status quo would burden businesses with administrative procedures and undermine ongoing harmonisation efforts at WTO level;
4. pozdravlja poenostavljeni sistem carinskega nadzora, ki je bil uveden leta 2009, in priznava njegov pomen pri poenostavljanju mednarodne trgovine; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče razkrilo nezadosten nadzor in revidiranje teh poenostavljenih postopkov v državah članicah; zato poudarja, kako pomembno je primerno izvajanje tega nadzornega sistema, in spodbuja Komisijo, naj skrbno spremlja ta postopek, da prepreči izgube v proračunu EU in kršitve določb trgovinske politike;
Welcomes the simplified customs control system that was introduced in 2009 and recognises its importance in facilitating international trade; notes with concern that the Court of Auditors has revealed an insufficient control and audit of these simplified procedures in Member States; therefore emphasises the importance of suitable implementation of this control system and encourages the Commission to closely follow this process in order to avoid losses to the EU budget as well as breaches of trade policy provisions;
7. opozarja, da je pri enotnem nadzoru in vzajemnem priznavanju pomembno zagotoviti enako obravnavanje pooblaščenih gospodarskih subjektov na vsem carinskem ozemlju Skupnosti;
Reiterates the importance of ensuring equal treatment for authorised economic operators (AEO) throughout the Community customs territory as regards uniformity of the controls and mutual recognition;
10. spodbuja Komisijo, naj razvije večstranske načrte za sodelovanje in usklajevanje znotraj Svetovne carinske organizacije, da se oblikujejo skupni standardi ter pravila, ki bi izboljšali varnost in učinkovitost carinskih postopkov ter postopkov na meji in z uporabo istih standardov ter izmenjavo zgledov dobre prakse zmanjšali stroške;
Encourages the Commission to develop multilateral cooperation and coordination plans within the World Customs Organisation (WCO), in order to lay down joint standards and rules that will improve the security and effectiveness of customs and border procedures and reduce costs through the sharing of standards and the exchange of good practices;
William (grof) Dartmouthski, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Kader Arif, Martin Callanan, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Christofer Fjellner, Yannick Jadot, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Iuliu Winkler, Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Paweł Zalewski
William (The Earl of) Dartmouth, Laima Liucija Andrikienė, Kader Arif, Martin Callanan, David Campbell Bannerman, Daniel Caspary, Marielle De Sarnez, Christofer Fjellner, Yannick Jadot, Bernd Lange, David Martin, Emilio Menéndez del Valle, Vital Moreira, Paul Murphy, Franck Proust, Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl, Niccolò Rinaldi, Helmut Scholz, Peter Šťastný, Robert Sturdy, Gianluca Susta, Iuliu Winkler, Pablo Zalba Bidegain, Paweł Zalewski
Odločba št. 624/2007/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 23. maja 2007 o vzpostavitvi akcijskega programa za carino v Skupnosti (Carina 2013), UL L 154, 14.6.2007, str.
Decision No 624/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing an action programme for customs in the Community (Customs 2013), OJ L 154, 14.6.2007, p.
4. poziva k tesnejšemu sodelovanju in dejavni izmenjavi informacij in potrjenih postopkov s carinskimi organi sosednjih držav EU pri posodobitvi carine ter boju proti tihotapljenju in korupciji na področju carine;
Calls for closer cooperation, and the active exchange of information and proven procedures, with the customs authorities of the EU’s neighbouring countries with regard to customs modernisation and efforts to combat smuggling and corruption in the customs system;
7. poudarja, da v številnih državah članicah možnost t. i. ustne carinske deklaracije, ki je predvidena v carinskem zakoniku, za uvoz in izvoz do vrednosti 1000 EUR, uporabljajo zlasti mala in srednja podjetja; poudarja, da bi odprava tega postopka povzročila znatno dodatno administrativno in finančno obremenitev zlasti za mala in srednja podjetja, zato ne bi bila v skladu s ciljem EU glede zmanjšanja upravnih postopkov; vztraja, da je treba pri izvedbenih določbah za posodobljeni carinski kodeks ohraniti možnost t. i. ustne carinske deklaracije;
Points out that, in a number of Member States, small and medium-sized companies in particular use the option that is available under the Customs Code of ‘oral’ customs declarations for the import and export of consignments under the value of EUR 1 000; stresses that abolishing this simplified procedure would considerably increase the administrative and financial burden on SMEs in particular, and would therefore be at odds with the Union’s aim of reducing red tape; insists that the option of ‘oral’ customs declarations should be retained in the implementing rules for the modernised Customs Code;
Uredba (ES) št. 648/2005 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 13. aprila 2005 o spremembah Uredbe Sveta (EGS) št. 2913/92 o Carinskem zakoniku Skupnosti, UL L 117, 4.5.2005, str.
Recalls that customs control should be based on risk analysis using, amongst others, automated data processing techniques
13. , in poudarja, da lahko po mnenju Evropskega računskega sodišča samo avtomatizirani profili tveganja, vključeni v obdelavo carinskih deklaracij, zadostno varujejo interese finančne in trgovinske politike EU; obžaluje, da ima zelo malo držav članic vzpostavljene avtomatizirane profile tveganja za tradicionalna lastna sredstva in skupno trgovinsko politiko; poziva Komisijo, naj sprejme potrebne ukrepe za izboljšanje tega stanja;
Regulation (EC) No 648/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, OJ L 117, 4.5.2005, p.13. and points out that, in the European Court of Auditors’ view, only automated risk profiles integrated into the processing of customs declarations can sufficiently protect the financial and trade policy interests of the EU; deplores that very few Member States have automated risk profiles for TOR and common trade policy issues in place; urges the Commission to take the necessary measures in order to address this situation;
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Jorgocc Chatzimarkakis, Tamás Deutsch, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Jan Mulder, Jan Olbrycht, Crescenzio Rivellini, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
Marta Andreasen, Jean-Pierre Audy, Jorgo Chatzimarkakis, Tamás Deutsch, Jens Geier, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Ingeborg Gräßle, Ville Itälä, Jan Mulder, Jan Olbrycht, Crescenzio Rivellini, Bart Staes, Georgios Stavrakakis, Søren Bo Søndergaard
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Róża, grofica Thun Und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Pablo Arias Echeverría, Adam Bielan, Lara Comi, Anna Maria Corazza Bildt, António Fernando Correia De Campos, Jürgen Creutzmann, Cornelis de Jong, Evelyne Gebhardt, Małgorzata Handzlik, Iliana Ivanova, Eija-Riitta Korhola, Edvard Kožušník, Hans-Peter Mayer, Phil Prendergast, Mitro Repo, Robert Rochefort, Heide Rühle, Matteo Salvini, Christel Schaldemose, Andreas Schwab, Róża Gräfin von Thun und Hohenstein, Bernadette Vergnaud, Barbara Weiler
Regina Bastos, María Irigoyen Pérez, George Lyon, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Emma McClarkin, Konstantinos Pupakis (Konstantinos Poupakis), Silvana Rapti (Sylvana Rapti), Marc Tarabella, Kiriakos Triantafilidis (Kyriacos Triantaphyllides), Wim van de Camp
Regina Bastos, María Irigoyen Pérez, George Lyon, Ramona Nicole Mănescu, Emma McClarkin, Konstantinos Poupakis, Sylvana Rapti, Marc Tarabella, Kyriacos Triantaphyllides, Wim van de Camp
o stališču Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2011 za proračunsko leto 2011, Oddelek III – Evropska komisija
on the Council position on Draft amending budget No 6/2011 of the European Union for the financial year 2011, Section III – Commission
1. , zlasti členov 37 in 38 Uredbe,
1. , and particularly Articles 37 and 38 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju predloga spremembe proračuna Evropske unije št. 6/2011 za proračunsko leto 2011, ki ga je Komisija predložila dne 18. oktobra 2011 ( KOM(2011)0674 ),
– having regard to Draft amending budget No 6/2011 of the European Union for the financial year 2011, which the Commission presented on 18 October 2011 ( COM(2011)0674 ),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A7-0407/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A7-0407/2011 ),
A. ker predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6/2011 k splošnemu proračunu za leto 2011 med drugim zajema povečanje sredstev za prevzem obveznosti v razdelkih 1 in 4, in sicer za 3,25 milijona EUR oziroma 113,4 milijona EUR, povečanje sredstev za plačila za razdelek 1 za 550,3 milijona EUR ter popravek v napovedi prihodkov;
A. whereas Draft amending budget No 6/2011 to the general budget 2011 covers, inter alia, reinforcements in commitment appropriations in headings 1 and 4 for a respective amount of EUR 3,25 million and EUR 113,4 million, an increase of payment appropriations to cover needs in heading 1 for an amount of EUR 550,3 million, and an update in the forecast of the revenue;
B. ker je Svet spremenil predlog spremembe proračuna št. 6/2011, tako da je zmanjšal skupno neto povečanje sredstev za plačila na 200 milijonov EUR;
B. whereas the Council has modified Draft amending budget No 6/2011 by decreasing to EUR 200 million the total net reinforcement in payment appropriations;
C. ker je Parlament v celotnem proračunskem postopku za leto 2011 vztrajno poudarjal, da je skupna raven plačil, ki jo zagovarja Svet in je bila sprejeta za proračunsko leto 2011, nezadostna in ne bo omogočila izpolnitve vseh jasno dogovorjenih potreb;
C. whereas Parliament has persistently stressed, throughout the entire 2011 budgetary procedure, that the overall level of payments advocated by the Council and adopted for the financial year 2011 was insufficient and would not enable all clearly agreed needs to be met;
D. ker sta se obe veji proračunskega organa med spravnim postopkom v okviru proračuna za proračunsko leto 2011 dogovorili o skupni izjavi o sredstvih za plačila, s katero sta se Parlament in Svet zavezala, da „se bosta izogibala morebitnemu izpadu odobritev plačil“;
D. whereas both branches of the budgetary authority had agreed, during conciliation on the budget for the financial year 2011, on a Joint Statement on payment appropriations committing Parliament and the Council to "avoid any shortfall in payment appropriations";
F. ker bi predlagano povečanje sredstev za plačila za 200 milijonov EUR le delno pokrilo ugotovljene dodatne potrebe do konca leta 2011, ki dne 18. novembra 2011 znašajo 1.642 milijonov EUR;
F. whereas the proposed increase in payment appropriations by EUR 200 million represents only a limited part of the identified supplementary needs until the end of 2011, amounting to EUR 1 642 million as of 18 November 2011;
G. ker je povečanje sredstev v razdelku 4 za finančno pomoč Palestini, mirovni proces in UNRWA ter za spremljevalne ukrepe glede banan posledica prerazporeditve neporabljenih sredstev v okviru makrofinančne pomoči in je del dogovora, ki ga je Spravni odbor dosegel za proračun za proračunsko leto 2012;
G. whereas reinforcements under heading 4 for financial assistance to Palestine, the peace process and UNRWA, and for Banana Accompanying Measures are redeployed from unused appropriations under the Macro-Financial Assistance, and are part of the agreement reached by the conciliation committee on the budget for the financial year 2012;
H. ker del povečanja prihodkov izhaja iz glob in zamudnih obresti v skupnem znesku 435 milijonov EUR, torej iz izvajanja konkurenčne politike;
H. whereas part of the revenue increase stems from fines and interest on late payments totalling EUR 435 million, i.e. from the enforcement of competition policy;
5. izraža pripravljenost za sodelovanje s Svetom in Komisijo pri pregledu stanja, da bi obravnavali morebitne slabosti in pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju sedanjih večletnih programov, zlasti tistih iz razdelkov 1a in 1b;
Expresses its willingness to take part, together with the Council and the Commission, in a stocktaking exercise in order to address potential shortcomings and shortfalls in the implementation of the current multiannual programmes, particularly those under headings 1a and 1b.
7. brez sprememb odobri stališče Sveta o predlogu spremembe proračuna št. 6/2011 in naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj razglasi, da je sprememba proračuna št. 6/2011 dokončno sprejeta, in poskrbi za njeno objavo v Uradnem listu Evropske unije ;
Approves, without amendment, the Council position on Draft amending budget No 6/2011 and instructs its President to declare that Amending budget No 6/2011 has been definitively adopted and to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union ;
o predlogu direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o pravici do obveščenosti v kazenskem postopku
on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the right to information in criminal proceedings
Poročevalka: Birgit Sippel
Rapporteur: Birgit Sippel
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2010)0392 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2010)0392 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 82(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C7-0189/2010 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 82(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7-0189/2010 ),
– ob upoštevanju prispevkov, ki so jih glede osnutka zakonodajnega akta predložili grški parlament, španski kongres poslancev, italijanski senat in portugalski parlament,
– having regard to the contributions submitted by the Greek Parliament, the Spanish Congress of Deputies, the Italian Senate and the Portuguese Parliament on the draft legislative act,
– ob upoštevanju zaveze predstavnika Sveta v pismu z dne ..., da bo odobril stališče Evropskega parlamenta v skladu s členom 294(4) PDEU,
– having regard to the undertaking given by the Council representative by letter of … to approve Parliament's position, in accordance with Article 294(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0408/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0408/2011 ),
PREDLOGI SPREMEMB EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA
AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
o pravici do obveščenosti v kazenskem postopku
on the right to information in criminal proceedings
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in zlasti člena 82(2) Pogodbe,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 82(2) thereof,
(3) Evropska unija si je zastavila cilj ohranjati in razvijati območje svobode, varnosti in pravice.
(3) The European Union has set itself the objective of maintaining and developing an area of freedom, security and justice.
V skladu z zaključki Evropskega sveta iz Tampereja z dne 15. in 16. oktobra 1999 ter zlasti s točko 33 teh zaključkov mora načelo vzajemnega priznavanja v Uniji postati temelj pravosodnega sodelovanja v civilnih in kazenskih zadevah, saj bi okrepljeno vzajemno priznavanje sodnih odločb in sodb ter potrebno približevanje zakonodaje olajšalo sodelovanje med organi in sodno varstvo pravic posameznikov.
According to the conclusions of the European Council in Tampere of 15 and 16 October 1999, and in particular point 33 thereof, the principle of mutual recognition should become the cornerstone of judicial cooperation in both civil and criminal matters within the Union, since enhanced mutual recognition of judicial decisions and judgments and the necessary approximation of legislation would facilitate cooperation between authorities and the judicial protection of individual rights.
(4) Svet je 29. novembra 2000 v skladu s sklepi iz Tampereja sprejel program ukrepov za izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah
(4) On 29 November 2000 the Council, in accordance with the Tampere Conclusions, adopted a programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters
UL C 12, 15.1.2001, str.
OJ C 12, 15.1.2001, p.
V uvodu programa ukrepov je zapisano, da je namen vzajemnega priznavanja „okrepiti sodelovanje med državami članicami“ in „povečati varstvo pravic posameznika“.
The introduction to the programme of measures states that mutual recognition is "designed to strengthen cooperation between Member States" and "to enhance the protection of individual rights".
(5) Izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja odločb v kazenskih zadevah temelji na predpostavki, da države članice zaupajo v kazenskopravne sisteme drugih držav članic.
(5) Implementation of the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters presupposes that Member States have trust in each other's criminal justice systems.
Obseg izvajanja vzajemnega priznavanja je v veliki meri odvisen od vrste parametrov, ki vključujejo mehanizme za varovanje pravic osumljencev ali obtožencev in skupne minimalne standarde, potrebne za lažje izvajanje načela vzajemnega priznavanja.
The extent of the mutual recognition exercise is very much dependent on a number of parameters, which include mechanisms for safeguarding the rights of suspected or accused persons and common minimum standards necessary to facilitate the application of the principle of mutual recognition.
(6) Vzajemno priznavanje lahko deluje učinkovito le v duhu zaupanja, kjer ne le sodni organi, temveč vsi udeleženci kazenskega postopka priznavajo odločbe sodnih organov drugih držav članic kot enakovredne svojim lastnim, kar pomeni ne le zaupanje v ustreznost pravil partnerjev, ampak tudi zaupanje v pravilno uporabo teh pravil.
(6) Mutual recognition can only operate effectively in a spirit of confidence, whereby not only judicial authorities, but all actors in the criminal process see decisions of the judicial authorities of other Member States as equivalent to their own, implying not only trust in the adequacy of one's partners' rules, but also trust that those rules are correctly applied.
(6a) Člen 47 Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah (v nadaljnjem besedilu: Listina) in člen 6 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (v nadaljnjem besedilu: EKČP) zagotavljata pravico do poštenega sojenja.
(6a) Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the Charter) and Article 6 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) enshrine the right to a fair trial.
Člen 48 Listine zagotavlja spoštovanje pravice do obrambe.
Article 48 of the Charter guarantees respect for the rights of the defence.