natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da je zaradi sedanje svetovne finančne in gospodarske krize treba znatno povečati zgornjo mejo za neporavnane zneske iz posojil, ki se odobrijo državam članicam, določeno v Uredbi (ES) št. 332/2002, in upoštevati časovni razpored Parlamenta; poudarja, da bi to povečanje prav tako izboljšalo prožnost Skupnosti pri odzivanju na nove zahteve za srednjeročno finančno pomoč;
Recognises that, owing to the current global financial and economic crisis, the ceiling for the outstanding amount of loans to be granted to Member States as laid down in Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 should be significantly increased, taking due account of Parliament's calendar; underlines that such an increase would also enhance the Community's flexibility in responding to further requests for medium-term financial assistance;
pozdravlja prostovoljne sporazume med bankami in državami članicami, ki so nedavno pristopile k Evropski uniji, v okviru katerih se banke vzdržijo omejevanja kreditnih linij (na primer v zvezi z Romunijo in dunajskim sporazumom) ter nadalje spodbuja te pobude;
Welcomes the voluntary agreements between banks and the Member States that more recently acceded to the European Union under which the former refrain from cutting credit lines (for example, as regards Romania and the Vienna Accord), and encourages further such initiatives;
ugotavlja, da to znatno povečanje omogoča Komisiji čim bolj povečati možnosti najemanja posojil na kapitalskih trgih ali pri finančnih institucijah; poleg tega ugotavlja, da Skupnost nima pravne podlage za izdajo obveznic na svetovnem trgu, vendar pa Komisija izvaja pripravljalne dejavnosti, da bi dvema ali več državam članicam omogočili skupno izdajo obveznic, ki se glasijo na euro;
Notes that this significant increase makes it possible to maximise the Commission's borrowing potential on capital markets or from financial institutions; notes, furthermore, that there is no legal basis for the Community to issue bonds on the global market, but that the Commission is undertaking preparatory work with a view to allowing two or more Member States to jointly issue euro-denominated bonds;
poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj z Evropsko investicijsko banko preuči možnost, kako premagati kreditno krizo v dejanskem gospodarstvu z novimi inovativnimi finančnimi instrumenti; poudarja, da se lahko uporabi različne finančne instrumente za zagotavljanje prilagodljivosti aranžmaja za zagotavljanje srednjeročne finančne pomoči za plačilne bilance držav članic;
Calls on the Commission to investigate, together with the European Investment Bank, how the credit crunch in the real economy can be overcome with the help of new innovative financial instruments; points out that a variety of financial instruments could be used to ensure the flexibility of the facility providing medium-term financial assistance for Member States' balances of payments;
ugotavlja, da takšno povečanje zgornje meje za posojila ne bi vplivalo na proračun, ker bi Komisija vzela posojila na finančnih trgih in države članice upravičenke bi jih morale povrniti; poudarja, da bi povečanje zgornje meje za posojila imelo posledice za proračun samo v primeru, če bi država članica ustavila plačilo dolga;
Notes that there would be no budgetary impact in the event that the loan ceiling were raised because the Commission would acquire the loans on the financial markets and the beneficiary Member States would be required to reimburse them; stresses that the only possible budgetary impact of raising the loan ceiling would be in the event that a Member State were to default on its debt;
pozdravlja vlogo, ki jo omenjeni predlog Komisije namenja Računskemu sodišču, ko je to potrebno;
Welcomes the role attributed by the above-mentioned Commission proposal to the Court of Auditors in case of need;
meni, da bi morali biti pogoji, povezani z dodelitvijo te finančne pomoči, v skladu s cilji Skupnosti - in jih spodbujati - glede kakovosti javne porabe, trajnostne rasti in sistemov socialnega varstva, polne zaposlenosti, boja proti podnebnim spremembam in glede energetske učinkovitosti;
Believes that the conditions attached to the granting of this financial assistance should be in line with, and foster the promotion of, the Community's objectives in terms of quality of public spending, sustainable growth and social security systems, full employment, the fight against climate change and energy efficiency;
opozarja, da se člen 100 Pogodbe uporablja za vse države članice, in poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog za uredbo o opredelitvi pogojev za izvajanje te določbe; opozarja, da člen 103 Pogodbe poudarja, da države članice 'niso odgovorne in ne prevzemajo odgovornosti enot centralne, regionalne ali lokalne ravni države ali drugih oseb javnega prava ali javnih podjetij druge države članice, kar pa ne vpliva na vzajemna finančna jamstva za skupno izvedbo določenega projekta' ter lahko Svet po potrebi v skladu s postopkom iz člena 252 opredeli pojme v zvezi z uporabo prepovedi, ki so navedene v členu 101 in v tem členu';
Recalls that Article 100 of the Treaty is applicable to all Member States and invites the Commission to put forward a proposal for a regulation to define the conditions of implementation of that provision; recalls that Article 103 of the Treaty states that Member States 'shall not be liable for or assume the commitments of central governments, regional, local or other public authorities, other bodies governed by public law, or public undertakings of another Member State, without prejudice to mutual financial guarantees for the joint execution of a specific project', and that, 'if necessary, the Council, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 252, may specify definitions for the application of the prohibition referred to in Article 101 and in this Article';
zahteva, da je Parlament obveščen o memorandumih o soglasju, sklenjenih med Komisijo in zadevnimi državami članicami, s podrobnejšo opredelitvijo pogojev glede posojil;
Requests that Parliament be informed of the memorandums of understanding concluded between the Commission and the Member States concerned, detailing the conditions of the loans;
poziva Komisijo, naj med recesijo zagotovi usklajevanje gospodarske politike na ravni Skupnosti ter skupaj s Parlamentom ustanovi skupino strokovnjakov ter pripravi okvir in smernice memorandumov o soglasju, sklenjenih med Komisijo in zadevnimi državami članicami, z določitvijo pogojev glede posojil;
Asks the Commission to ensure the coordination of economic policy at Community level during downturns and to set up a group of experts together with Parliament and prepare a framework and guidelines for the memorandums of understanding concluded between the Commission and the Member States concerned, setting out the conditions of the loans;
opozarja, da je Parlament v omenjenih stališčih z dne 6. septembra 2001 in 20. novembra 2008 zahteval, naj Svet vsaki dve leti na podlagi poročila Komisije, po posvetovanju s Parlamentom in po predložitvi mnenja Ekonomsko-finančnega odbora pregleda, ali vpeljani aranžma še vedno zadovoljuje potrebe, zaradi katerih je bil uveden; sprašuje Svet in Komisijo, ali so bila ta poročila pripravljena od sprejetja uredbe (ES) št. 332/2002;
Recalls that Parliament requested, in its above-mentioned positions of 6 September 2001 and 20 November 2008, that the Council examine, every two years, on the basis of a report from the Commission, after consulting Parliament and after the delivery of the Economic and Financial Committee's opinion, whether the facility established continues to meet the needs which led to its creation; asks the Council and the Commission whether such reports have been drawn up since the adoption of Regulation (EC) No 332/2002;
ki ga predlaga Salvador Garriga Polledo
by country-regionCityplaceSalvador Garriga Polledo
o evropskemu letu samozaposlitve
on the European Year of the Self-Employed
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o evropskemu letu samozaposlitve
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the European Year of the Self-Employed
ker imajo sedaj evropska podjetja precej manj razlogov za zaposlovanje delavcev,
whereas European business as a whole has considerably less reason now to hire workers,
zahteva, da se leto 2010 v Evropski uniji razglasi za evropsko leto samozaposlitve;
Calls for the year 2010 to be declared throughout the European Union as the Year of the Self-Employed;
zaradi tega zahteva, da različne institucije Skupnosti oblikujejo novo razsežnost samozaposlitve v vseh državah članicah;
Calls, for this reason, on the various Community institutions to shape a new dimension to self-employment in all the Member States;
zahteva, da nova ureditev samozaposlitve v Evropski uniji pripomore k rešitvi njene visoke stopnje brezposelnosti in ponudi nova pričakovanja in upanja številnim milijonom brezposelnih.
Calls for the new rules on self-employment to help overcome the high level of unemployment in the European Union and to open up new horizons and offer new hope to the many millions of unemployed workers.
k vprašanjema za ustni odgovor B6‑0230/2009 in B6‑0071/2009
further to Question for Oral Answer B6‑0230/2009
o osnutku Uredbe Komisije (ES) št..... z dne .... , ki spreminja prilogo XVII Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH)
on draft Commission Regulation (EC) No .... of .... amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), as regards Annex XVII
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o osnutku Uredbe Komisije (ES) št..... z dne .... , ki spreminja prilogo XVII Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH)
European Parliament resolution on draft Commission Regulation (EC) No .... of .... amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), as regards Annex XVII
ob upoštevanju osnutka Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja prilogo XVII Uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH),
having regard to draft Commission Regulation (EC) No ....of .... amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), as regards Annex XVII,
ob upoštevanju mnenja, ki ga je podal odbor iz člena 133 omenjene uredbe,
having regard to the opinion delivered by the committee referred to in Article 133 of the above regulation,
ob upoštevanju člena 5a.3(b) Sklepa Sveta 1999/468/ES z dne 28. junija 1999 o določitvi postopkov za uresničevanje Komisiji podeljenih izvedbenih pooblastil,
having regard to Article 5a(3)(b) of Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the Commission,
ker se z Uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o registraciji, evalvaciji, avtorizaciji in omejevanju kemikalij (REACH) s 1. junijem 2009 razveljavi in nadomesti Direktiva Sveta 76/769/EGS z dne 27. julija 1976 o približevanju zakonov in drugih predpisov držav članic v zvezi z omejitvami pri trženju in uporabi nekaterih nevarnih snovi in pripravkov,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) repeals and replaces Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparations with effect from 1 June 2009,
ker naj bi priloga XVII osnutka Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ... , ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH) nadomestila prilogo I k direktivi 76/769/EGS, ki uvaja omejitve za nekatere nevarne snovi in pripravke,
whereas Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, as amended by the annex to the above-mentioned draft Commission regulation, is intended to replace Annex I to Directive 76/769/EEC establishing restrictions for certain dangerous substances and preparations,
ker člen 67 uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 določa, da se snovi, pripravkov ali izdelkov ne sme proizvajati, dajati v promet ali uporabljati, če ne izpolnjujejo pogojev iz omejitev, ki so zanje določene v prilogi XVII,
whereas Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that substances, mixtures or articles may not be manufactured, placed on the market or used unless they comply with the conditions of any restrictions laid down in their regard in Annex XVII,
ker je namen točke 6 priloge XVII osnutka uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH), razširiti trenutno prepoved dajanja azbestnih vlaken in izdelkov, ki ta vlakna vsebujejo, v promet na proizvodnjo teh vlaken in izdelkov, ki ta vlakna vsebujejo,
whereas point 2, item 6 of the above-mentioned annex to the draft Commission regulation is aimed at extending the current ban regarding the placing on the market and use of asbestos fibres and of products containing these fibres to the manufacture of these fibres and articles containing asbestos fibres,
ker so v točki 6 priloge XVII osnutka uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH), ohranjena izvzetja od prepovedi za azbestna vlakna, npr.
whereas point 2, item 6 of the above-mentioned annex to the draft Commission regulation maintains exemptions from the ban on asbestos fibres
∙ za izdelke, ki vsebujejo azbestna vlakna in so bila vgrajena, ali so bila v uporabi že pred 1. januarjem 2005, in sicer pod posebnimi pogoji, ki zagotavljajo visoko stopnjo varovanja zdravja ljudi,
∙ for articles containing asbestos fibres which were already installed or in service before 1 January 2005 under specific conditions ensuring a high level of protection of human health
∙ in za diafragme, ki vsebujejo krizotil in obstoječe naprave za elektrolizo,
∙ and for diaphragms containing chrysolite in existing electrolysis installations,
ker na trg Skupnosti ni dovoljeno vnašati novega azbesta, z izjemo diafragem za elektrolizo, in ker v Skupnosti obstajajo posebne določbe o zaščiti delavcev pred nevarnostmi zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu, ko se ta odstranjuje, in ker na žalost ni določb Skupnosti o dekontaminaciji izdelkov, ki vsebujejo azbest, in se ta odgovornost prepušča državam članicam,
whereas no new asbestos may be put onto the Community market, with the exception of diaphragms for electrolysis, and whereas there are specific Community provisions for the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work when removing asbestos, and there are unfortunately no Community provisions on the decontamination of articles containing asbestos, leaving this to the competence of Member States,
ker še vedno velja, da je azbest kriv za precejšnje število bolezni, ki so posledica izpostavljenosti azbestnim vlaknom,
whereas asbestos remains responsible for a substantial number of diseases due to exposure to asbestos fibres,
ker je bila z direktivo 96/59/ES določena obveznost za države članice, da dekontaminirajo ali odstranijo opremo, ki vsebuje PCB-je in/ali odstranijo odpadne PCB- je, da se jih popolnoma izloči; ker bi morala Skupnost sprejeti podobne ukrepe glede azbestnih vlaken,
whereas Directive 96/59/EC has established obligations on Member States for the decontamination or disposal of equipment containing PCBs and/or the disposal of used PCBs in order to eliminate them completely; whereas the Community should take similar action on asbestos fibres,
ker zakonodaja Skupnosti obsega šest azbestnih mineralov (krokidolit, amozit, antofilit, aktinolit, tremolit in krizotil), vendar še ne zajema azbestu podobnih mineralov, kot sta rihterit in vinhit, čeprav bi ju lahko obravnavali kot minerala, ki nista nič manj nevarna od tremolita, amozita ali krokidolita in podobnih, ki se uporabljajo v izolacijskih materialih,
whereas Community legislation covers six asbestos minerals (crocidolite, amosite, anthophyllite, actinolite, tremolite and chrysotile), but does not yet cover asbestiform minerals such as richterite and winchite, even though they could be considered as being no less harmful than tremolite, amosite or crocidolite and similarly used in insulation materials,
ker bo Komisija, potem ko bo prejela poročila držav članic, ki uporabljajo izvzetje za diafragme, to izvzetje pregledala in prosila agencijo, naj v skladu s členom 69 uredbe (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH) pripravi dokumentacijo, da prepove uporabo in dajanje diafragem, ki vsebujejo krizolit, na trg,
whereas, following receipt of the reports of Member States which are making use of the diaphragm exemption, the Commission will review the exemption and request the Agency to prepare a dossier in accordance with Article 69 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) with a view to prohibiting the placing on the market and use of diaphragms containing chrysolite,
ker nekatere interesne skupine trdijo, da mora izvzetje zdaj, ko že obstajajo nadomestne tehnologije (membrane brez azbesta) in jih večina evropskih proizvajalcev kemičnih izdelkov uporablja, prenehati veljati,
whereas some stakeholders argue that the derogation must end now because substitute technologies (asbestos-free membranes) already exist and are being used by most European chemical manufacturers,
ker bi z brezpogojno prepovedjo uporabe krizotilnih azbestnih vlaken in izdelkov, ki ta vlakna vsebujejo, dejansko najbolj učinkovito zaščitili zdravje ljudi,
whereas the most effective way of protecting human health would indeed be to prohibit the use of chrysotile asbestos fibres and products containing them, without any exemption,
ker so zdaj za večino področij uporabe krizotilnega azbesta na voljo nadomestki ali druge možnosti, ki niso opredeljene kot rakotvorne in veljajo za manj nevarne,
whereas there are now available for most remaining uses of chrysotile asbestos substitutes or alternatives which are not classified as carcinogens and are regarded as less dangerous,
ker so bile pri reviziji izvzetja krizotilnih azbestnih diafragem, izvedeni v skladu z direktivo 76/769/EGS http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/markrestr/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/markrestr/index_en.htm , preverjene zdravstvene in gospodarske posledice in jih je Komisija upoštevala ob predložitvi predloga o drugačnem pristopu, določenega v osnutku Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH), ki ga podpira velika večina držav članic,
whereas, in the review concerning the derogation for chrysotile asbestos diaphragms conducted under Directive 76/769/EEC http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/markrestr/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/chemicals/legislation/markrestr/index_en.htm , both health and economic impacts have been examined and taken into account when the Commission forwarded its differentiated approach as laid down in the draft Commission Regulation (EC) No....of .... amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), supported by a large majority of Member States,
ob upoštevanju
In the light of
∙ pristopa iz osnutka uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH), ki določa postopno odpravo azbestnih vlaken v srednjeročnem obdobju,
∙ the approach taken by draft Commission Regulation (EC) No....of....amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH) to phase out asbestos fibres in the medium term,
∙ revizije izvzetja, ki velja za krizotilne azbestne diafragme po direktivi Komisije 1999/77/ES, in
∙ the review of the derogation of chrysotile asbestos diaphragms conducted under Commission Directive 1999/77/EC, and
∙ izjave, ki jo je dala Komisija ob sprejetju osnutka uredbe Komisije v odboru držav članic REACH-a dne 20. februarja 2008,
∙ the statement made by the Commission on the occasion of the adoption of the draft Commission Regulation in the REACH Member State Committee on 20 February 2008,
ne bo nasprotoval sprejetju osnutka uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH),
refrains from opposing the adoption of draft Commission Regulation (EC) No.... of .... amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH);
je seznanjen z revizijo izvzetja, ki velja za krizotilne azbestne diafragme, in poudarja, da visokonapetostni postroji delujejo uspešno tudi z nadomestnimi materiali in so v EU nekatere izmed njih že prilagodili;
Notes the review concerning the derogation for chrysotile asbestos diaphragms and stresses that high-voltage installations can be successfully operated with substitute materials, and that some such installations in the EU have been converted;
poudarja, da se azbestne diafragme uporabljajo še v štirih državah članicah v nizkonapetostnih postrojih, za katere kljub obsežnemu raziskovalnemu programu, ki so ga izvedle družbe, ki jih upravljajo, ni na voljo nadomestnih materialov za diafragme;
Underlines that currently four Member States still use asbestos diaphragms in installations of the low-voltage type for which no substitute diaphragm materials are available despite a considerable programme of research that has been carried out by the companies concerned;
poudarja, da iz revizije izvzetja, ki velja za krizotilne azbestne diafragme, izhaja, da nevarnost za izpostavljenost delavcev obstaja le ob izmenjavi diafragem (z življenjsko dobo do 10 let), saj so elektrolitske celice med delovanjem hermetično zaprte, da zadržijo klorov plin, in ker industrijski sektor poroča, da se v celoti spoštujejo omejitve, ki veljajo za izpostavljenost delavcev krizotilu;
Stresses that, according to the review concerning the derogation for chrysotile asbestos diaphragms, the potential for worker exposure exists only when diaphragms need replacing (lifetime up to 10 years) because the electrolysis cells are hermetically sealed during operation to contain the chlorine gas, and industry reports that worker exposure limits for chrysotile are fully respected;
poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj zagotovijo dosledno izvajanje direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o varstvu delavcev pred tveganji zaradi izpostavljenosti azbestu pri delu;
Calls on the PlaceNameplaceMembercountry-region PlaceTypeStates and the Commission to ensure strict implementation of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to asbestos at work;
obžaluje, da doslej ni bilo mogoče sestaviti evropskega seznama izdelkov, ki so izvzeti iz prepovedi v skladu s prilogo VXII, točko 6.2 osnutka Uredbe Komisije (ES) št. ... z dne ..., ki spreminja uredbo (ES) št. 1907/2006 (REACH);
Regrets that it has so far been impossible to establish a European list of articles exempted from the ban under point 2, item 6 of the above-mentioned annex to the draft Commission regulation amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006;
poziva Komisijo, naj takoj po seznanitvi z ustreznimi nacionalnimi ukrepi, najkasneje pa do 1. januarja 2012, oblikuje tak seznam;
Calls on the Commission to establish such a list immediately after communication of the relevant national measures, and no later than 1 January 2012;
poziva Komisijo, naj do konca leta 2009 izdela zakonodajni predlog o nadzorovani odstranitvi azbestnih vlaken ter dekontaminaciji ali odstranitvi opreme, ki vsebuje azbestna vlaka, zaradi njihovega popolnega umika;
Urges the Commission to make a legislative proposal by the end of 2009 on the controlled disposal of asbestos fibres and the decontamination or disposal of equipment containing asbestos fibres in order to eliminate them completely;