natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Do leta 2014 naj bi bile afganistanske oborožene sile same odgovorne za varnost v državi.
By 2014, Afghan forces are supposed to be solely responsible for the security in the country.
Ob upoštevanju trenutnih proračunskih omejitev je negotova tudi prihodnost financiranja razvojne pomoči ZDA Afganistanu.
Taking current budget constraints into account the future of funding of US development aid to Afghanistan is also uncertain.
Hkrati se afganistansko gospodarstvo v ogromni meri opira na civilno pomoč in vojaške izdatke.
At the same time, the Afghan economy relies to an enormous extent on civilian aid and military expenditure.
Te izzive bo očitno treba obravnavati na konferenci v Bonnu decembra 2011.
These challenges will clearly need to be addressed at the Bonn conference in December 2011.
V številnih razpravah o Afganistanu je bil poročevalec obveščen, da količina civilne pomoči dejansko ni glavni razlog za skrb.
In many of the discussions led on Afghanistan, your rapporteur has been informed that the volume of civilian aid is actually not the utmost cause of concern.
Bolj vprašljiv je način porabe civilne pomoči, zlasti to, ali se porabi z dolgoročnim ciljem podpirati vzdržne projekte.
The more pertinent question is how civilian aid is spent, especially whether it is spent with a long-term view to support sustainable projects.
Dejansko je videti, da velika količina pomoči povzroča pritisk, naj se sredstva porabijo čim prej, to pa ogroža vzdržnost in učinkovitost projektov.
In fact, the large volume of aid appears to create a pressure to utilise the funds as quickly as possible which puts at risk the sustainability and effectiveness of projects.
Poročevalec zato meni, da bi lahko bili izzivi tudi priložnost za donatorsko skupnost, da bolje prerazporedi omejene vire in se osredotoči na vzdržne projekte, ki bodo najverjetneje dosegli dolgoročne rezultate.
Your rapporteur, therefore, takes the view that the challenges could also be an opportunity for the donor community to better allocate the scarce resources and to focus on sustainable projects which are likely to achieve long-term results.
o proračunskem nadzoru finančne pomoči EU v Afganistanu
on budgetary control of EU financial assistance to Afghanistan
4. meni, da ima Evropska unija kot ena od največjih donatorjev uradne razvojne in humanitarne pomoči Afganistanu (več kot 2 milijardi EUR med letom 2002 in koncem leta 2010) posebno odgovornost, da oceni, ali ta sredstva dosežejo prejemnike in izboljšajo njihove življenjske razmere;
Takes the view that the European Union, as one of the major donors of official development and humanitarian assistance to Afghanistan (more than EUR 2 billion between 2002 and the end of 2010), has a particular responsibility to evaluate whether those funds reach the intended recipients and improve their living conditions;
7. meni, da bi morala Komisija razmisliti o uvedbi sektorske proračunske podpore; vendar poudarja, da bi morala biti taka pomoč strogo pogojena z merljivimi kazalniki učinka in bi se lahko uporabljala samo skupaj z ukrepi za gradnjo zmogljivosti ter v upravah, katerih organizacijske strukture in zmožnosti finančnega upravljanja so se na podlagi ustrezne ocene izkazale za primerne in pregledne.
Is of the opinion that the Commission should consider introducing sectoral budget support; stresses, however, that such aid should be strictly conditional, with measurable impact indicators, and can only be used together with capacity-building measures and in administrations whose organisational structures and financial management capabilities have been properly assessed and considered adequate and transparent;
Pino Arlacchi, Elmar Brok, Andrzej Grzyb, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Kopa (Maria Eleni Koppa), Andrej Kovačev (Andrey Kovatchev), Krzysztof Lisek, Mario Mauro, Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Vincent Peillon, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Boris Zala
Pino Arlacchi, Elmar Brok, Andrzej Grzyb, Anneli Jäätteenmäki, Tunne Kelam, Nicole Kiil-Nielsen, Maria Eleni Koppa, Andrey Kovatchev, Krzysztof Lisek, Mario Mauro, Francisco José Millán Mon, Annemie Neyts-Uyttebroeck, Norica Nicolai, Ioan Mircea Paşcu, Vincent Peillon, Bernd Posselt, Hans-Gert Pöttering, José Ignacio Salafranca Sánchez-Neyra, Nikolaos Salavrakos, Charles Tannock, Inese Vaidere, Boris Zala
Nikolaos Huntis (Nikolaos Chountis), Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Elisabeth Jeggle, Barbara Lochbihler, Monica Luisa Macovei, Konrad Szymański, Indrek Tarand, Janusz Władysław Zemke
Nikolaos Chountis, Tanja Fajon, Kinga Gál, Liisa Jaakonsaari, Elisabeth Jeggle, Barbara Lochbihler, Monica Luisa Macovei, Konrad Szymański, Indrek Tarand, Janusz Władysław Zemke
6. se obrača posebej na afganistansko vlado, naj se usmeri v vzpostavitev institucionalnih zmogljivosti v javnem sektorju in pripravi enoten državni program reforme javne uprave; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj se v dialogih z vlado o politikah skupno zavzemajo za reformo javne uprave in usklajeno podprejo cilje vladne reforme javne uprave;
Calls, in particular, on the Afghan Government to focus on institutional capacity development in the public sector and to develop a single national programme for public administration reform (PAR); calls on the Commission and the Member States to advocate PAR collectively in their policy dialogue with the government, and to support the government’s PAR objectives in a coordinated manner;
10. meni, da sedanja razdrobljenost pomoči, ki jo zagotavljajo donatorji, negativno vpliva na njeno učinkovitost in povzroča podvajanje strategij; poziva Komisijo, države članice in mednarodno skupnost k boljšemu usklajevanju pomoči;
Argues that the current fragmentation of donor assistance is having a negative impact on aid effectiveness and resulting in duplicated strategies; calls on the Commission, the Member States and the international community to coordinate their aid efforts better;
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Teoharus (Eleni Theocharous), Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
Thijs Berman, Michael Cashman, Véronique De Keyser, Nirj Deva, Leonidas Donskis, Catherine Grèze, András Gyürk, Filip Kaczmarek, Michał Tomasz Kamiński, Franziska Keller, Miguel Angel Martínez Martínez, Maurice Ponga, Birgit Schnieber-Jastram, Michèle Striffler, Alf Svensson, Eleni Theocharous, Patrice Tirolien, Ivo Vajgl, Anna Záborská, Iva Zanicchi, Gabriele Zimmer
o prošnji Hrvaške za članstvo v Evropski uniji
on the application of Croatia to become a member of the European Union
MNENJE Odbora za ustavne zadeve ........................................................................14
OPINION of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ................................14
o prošnji Hrvaške za članstvo v Evropski uniji
on the application of Croatia to become a Member of the European Union
– ob upoštevanju osnutka pogodbe o pristopu Republike Hrvaške k Evropski uniji ter protokola in sklepne listine,
– having regard to the draft Treaty concerning the Accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, the Protocol and the Final Act,
– ob upoštevanju prošnje za članstvo v Evropski uniji, ki jo je Republika Hrvaška vložila 21. februarja 2003,
– having regard to the application for accession to the European Union submitted by the Republic of Croatia on 21 February 2003,
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Komisije z dne 20. aprila 2004 o prošnji Republike Hrvaške za članstvo v Evropski uniji,
– having regard to the Commission’s opinion of 20 April 2004 on the application by the Republic of Croatia to become a member of the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju sklepa Sveta z dne 3. oktobra 2005, da z Republiko Hrvaško začne pristopna pogajanja,
– having regard to the decision by the Council on 3 October 2005 to open accession negotiations with the Republic of Croatia,
– ob upoštevanju rednih poročil Komisije o napredku Hrvaške na poti do pristopa, ki zajemajo obdobje 2005–2011,
– having regard to the Commission’s regular reports on Croatia’s progress towards accession covering the period 2005-2011,
– ob upoštevanju vmesnega poročila Komisije o reformah na Hrvaškem na področju pravosodja in temeljnih pravic z dne 2. marca 2011,
– having regard to the Commission’s interim report on reforms in Croatia in the field of judiciary and fundamental rights dated 2 March 2011,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Solunu 19. in 20. junija 2003 o državah zahodnega Balkana,
– having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the Thessaloniki European Council of 19‑20 June 2003 on the Western Balkan countries,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Evropskega sveta z dne 23. in 24. junija 2011,
– having regard to the conclusions of the European Council of 23 and 24 June 2011,
– ob upoštevanju vseh svojih prejšnjih resolucij in poročil o napredku Hrvaške in procesu širitve,
– having regard to all its previous resolutions and reports on Croatia’s progress and the enlargement process,
– ob upoštevanju vseh prejšnjih priporočil skupnega parlamentarnega odbora EU in Hrvaške,
– having regard to all previous recommendations of the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za proračun in Odbora za ustavne zadeve ( A7-0389/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Constitutional Affairs ( A7-0389/2011 ),
A. ker je Hrvaška dvajset let po razglasitvi svoje neodvisnosti in približno osem let po vložitvi prošnje za članstvo v EU dosegla zgodovinski mejnik v procesu vključevanja v EU, saj je uspešno zaključila pristopna pogajanja; ker dosežki Hrvaške zaslužijo brezpogojno priznanje;
A. whereas, twenty years after the declaration of its independence and some eight years after submitting its application for EU membership, Croatia has reached a historic milestone in its EU integration process by successfully closing accession negotiations; whereas Croatia’s achievements deserve unqualified recognition;
B. ker je pristopni proces znatno prispeval k preobrazbi Hrvaške v trdno in zrelo demokracijo, temelječo na evropskih vrednotah; ker obeti za pristop delujejo kot močna spodbuda za reforme, saj mobilizirajo različne akterje iz političnega, gospodarskega, socialnega in kulturnega življenja; ker se morajo reformna prizadevanja nadaljevati tudi po koncu pristopnih pogajanj in po pristopu, da bodo lahko država in državljani v celoti izkoristili prednosti članstva v EU;
B. whereas the accession process has significantly contributed to Croatia’s transformation into a solid and mature democracy based on European values; whereas the prospect of accession acts as a powerful catalyst for reform by mobilising the various actors in political, economic, social and cultural life; whereas reform efforts also need to be sustained beyond the completion of the negotiations and accession in order for the country and its citizens to benefit fully from EU membership;
C. ker bo članstvo Hrvaške okrepilo EU, obogatilo evropsko kulturo in dediščino ter pomembno prispevalo k ohranjanju verodostojnosti procesa širitve, hkrati pa bo dober primer, kako je mogoče z vestnim izvajanjem vseh sprejetih obveznosti doseči vse vnaprej opredeljene cilje;
C. whereas Croatian membership will make the EU stronger, enrich its European culture and heritage and make an important contribution to maintaining the credibility of the enlargement process, while at the same time being a good example of how the conscientious implementation of all commitments given can lead to the achievement of all predefined goals;
D. ker je v procesu pristopa bistveno, da se o vsaki državi odloča glede na njene dosežke, da hitrost pristopnih pogajanj narekuje dejansko izpolnjevanje københavnskih meril ter da se tudi dokončen datum pristopa določi glede na stopnjo izpolnjevanja teh meril;
D. whereas it is essential in the accession process that each country should be judged on its own merits, that the pace of accession negotiations should be dictated by effective compliance with the Copenhagen criteria and that the degree of compliance with those criteria should also determine the final date of accession;
E. ker nenehne reforme in njihovo celovito izvajanje, med drugim na področjih sodstva in temeljnih pravic ter boja proti korupciji, ostajajo izjemno pomembne za krepitev pravne države v korist vseh hrvaških državljanov;
E. whereas continued reforms, and their full implementation, in the fields of, inter alia, the judiciary and fundamental rights and the fight against corruption remain essential to the strengthening of the rule of law for the benefit of all Croatian citizens;
F. ker dejanska sprava med različnimi narodi in vzpostavitev dobrososedskih odnosov veliko prispevata k pristnemu procesu evropske integracije; ker sta pregon vojnih zločinov ter ponovno vključevanje beguncev in razseljenih oseb temeljna elementa spravnega procesa;
F. whereas true reconciliation between different peoples and the establishment of good-neighbourly relations contribute substantially to a genuine European integration process; whereas prosecutions for war crimes and the reintegration of refugees and displaced persons are fundamental elements of the reconciliation process;
G. ker bo imel uspešen pristop Hrvaške širše evropske in regionalne posledice ter bo pozitivno spodbudil proces evropske integracije tako v EU kot v regiji zahodnega Balkana; ker je obet članstva v EU močna spodbuda za države kandidatke in potencialne kandidatke v regiji, ki so na poti k evropski integraciji, da bi si prizadevale za potrebne politične, gospodarske in zakonodajne reforme ter krepile mir, stabilnost in spravo na temelju dobrososedskih odnosov; ker bi morala EU utrditi evropske obete za sosede Hrvaške in te države nenehno spodbujati k izpolnjevanju njihovih obveznosti na poti k polnopravnemu članstvu v EU;
G. whereas Croatia’s successful accession will have wider European and regional implications and will give positive impetus to the process of European integration in both the EU and the Western Balkan region; whereas the prospect of EU membership is a powerful incentive for candidate and potential candidate countries in the region, on the path to European integration, to pursue the necessary political, economic and legislative reforms and the strengthening of peace, stability and reconciliation based on good-neighbourly relations; whereas the EU should reinforce the European perspective for Croatia’s neighbouring countries and constantly encourage those countries to fulfil their obligations on their own route to full EU membership;
3. poudarja, da imata postopka za sprejetje pristopne pogodbe z Republiko Hrvaško in za sprejetje protokolov, ki jih zahtevata Irska in Češka republika, različni podlagi v pogodbah, in sicer člen 49 PEU za prvo oziroma člen 48 PEU za druge, zato jih pravno ni mogoče vključiti v en sam akt;
Points out that the procedures for the adoption of, on the one hand, the Accession Treaty with the Republic of Croatia and, on the other, the protocols requested by Ireland and the Czech Republic have different treaty bases – Articles 49 TEU and 48 TEU respectively – and therefore that they could not be legally incorporated into a single act;
7. bo sledil postopku spremljanja in poziva Komisijo, naj ga še naprej redno obvešča o tem, v kakšnem obsegu hrvaške oblasti spoštujejo zaveze iz pristopne pogodbe, da bodo lahko s pristopom 1. julija 2013 v celoti prevzele vse obveznosti članstva; poziva hrvaške oblasti, naj pregledno in vključujoče izvajajo obveznosti in k temu pritegnejo hrvaški parlament in civilno družbo ter naj redno ocenjujejo napredovanje reform; si pridržuje pravico, da na Komisijo in hrvaške oblasti naslavlja priporočila skozi celotni postopek spremljanja;
Will follow the monitoring process, and calls on the Commission to keep it regularly informed of the extent to which the Croatian authorities honour the commitments given in the Accession Treaty so as to assume their membership obligations fully upon accession on 1 July 2013; calls on the Croatian authorities to implement the commitments in a transparent and inclusive manner, involving the Croatian Parliament and civil society, and to evaluate the progress of reforms regularly; reserves the right to address recommendations to the Commission and the Croatian authorities throughout the monitoring process;
10. poziva hrvaške oblasti, naj dodatno okrepijo upravne zmogljivosti organov za boj proti korupciji, tudi z zgledovanjem po najboljši praksi EU, ter spodbujajo kulturo odgovornosti v politiki, javnem sektorju in sodstvu kot pogoj za izgradnjo in krepitev pravne države; poudarja, da so potrebna nenehna prizadevanja, da bi se izboljšali rezultati pri učinkovitem obravnavanju primerov organiziranega kriminala in korupcije ter da bi se okrepila zakonodaja, ki podjetjem, povezanim s kriminalnimi združbami, prepoveduje sodelovanje pri javnih naročilih; meni, da je pomembno nadaljnje reformiranje organov kazenskega pregona, da bi postali učinkoviti, uspešni, depolitizirani in spoštljivi do državljanskih pravic in svoboščin;
Calls on the Croatian authorities further to strengthen the administrative capacities of anti-corruption bodies, including by following EU best practice, and to foster a culture of political, public sector and judicial accountability as a prerequisite for building and strengthening the rule of law; stresses that continued efforts are needed to develop further the track record on handling organised-crime and corruption cases effectively and to strengthen legislation that prohibits companies with links to criminal organisations from participating in public procurement; considers it important to continue reforming law-enforcement agencies with the goal of making them efficient, effective, depoliticised and respectful of civil rights and freedoms;
13. pozdravlja dosežen napredek na področju pravic žensk in enakosti spolov; kljub temu je zaskrbljen, ker so ženske še naprej daleč premalo zastopane v organih odločanja na gospodarskem in političnem področju; poziva hrvaške oblasti, naj nemudoma zagotovijo dokončno izvajanje zakona o enakosti spolov, bolj aktivno spodbujajo udeležbo žensk v politiki, okrepijo položaj žensk na trgu dela in uvedejo načelo enakega plačila;
Welcomes the progress made in the area of women’s rights and gender equality; is concerned, however, that women continue to be severely under-represented in economic and political decision-making bodies; calls on the Croatian authorities swiftly to finalise implementation of the Gender Equality Act, to promote the participation of women in politics more actively, to strengthen the position of women on the labour market and to introduce the principle of equal pay;
20. poziva države članice, naj uporabijo sklepe o prehodnih določbah glede dostopa hrvaških delavcev do njihovih trgov dela na podlagi dejanskih informacij in zgolj v razmerah resnih motenj na nacionalnem trgu dela;
Calls on Member States to apply decisions on transitional provisions concerning Croatian workers’ access to their labour markets on the basis of factual information and only in the situation of serious disturbance of the national labour market;
27. spodbuja hrvaške oblasti, glede na še vedno prisotne slabosti v upravni zmogljivosti ustreznih hrvaških institucij, naj dodatno okrepijo upravne strukture in institucionalne zmogljivosti, potrebne za dobro izvajanje skupnega pravnega reda, da bo država po pristopu kar najbolje izkoristila prednosti članstva v EU;
Encourages the Croatian authorities – given that weaknesses remain in the administrative capacities of relevant Croatian institutions – further to reinforce the administrative structures and institutional capacities necessary for proper implementation of the acquis , so that the country can maximise the benefits of EU membership after accession;
29. poziva, naj se po celotnem zahodnem Balkanu v okviru programov, ki imajo več upravičencev, poveča uporaba finančnih instrumentov v podporo malim in srednjim podjetjem, razvoju infrastrukture in poslovnega okolja; ugotavlja, da je regionalno sodelovanje izjemnega pomena za gospodarski razvoj sosednjih držav Hrvaške in za plodovito sodelovanje z njimi;
Calls for increased use of the financial instruments that support SMEs, infrastructure development and the business environment as part of the multi-beneficiary programmes throughout the Western Balkans; notes that regional cooperation is of the utmost importance for the economic development of, and fruitful cooperation with, Croatia’s neighbouring countries;
31. meni, da je uspeh pristopa v veliki meri odvisen od podpore in predanosti državljanov, spodbuja hrvaške oblasti in civilno družbo, naj s pomočjo Komisije sprožijo obsežno in objektivno kampanjo obveščanja o obveznostih, posledicah in prednostih, ki izhajajo iz pristopa k EU, da bodo hrvaški državljani v celoti seznanjeni s svojo izbiro na referendumu ter da bodo lahko evropski projekt prepoznali tudi kot svoj projekt;
Considering that the success of accession depends to a large extent on the support and commitment of citizens, encourages the Croatian authorities and civil society to conduct, with the help of the Commission, a wide-ranging and objective information campaign on the obligations, consequences and advantages arising from EU accession so that the Croatian people will be fully aware of their choice in the referendum and that they see the European project as belonging to them too;
5. podpira ugotovitve Komisije, predstavljene v poročilu o napredku Hrvaške; pozdravlja dober splošen napredek Hrvaške, zlasti na področjih pravosodja in temeljnih pravic, konkurence ter tudi pravice, svobode in varnosti;
Endorses the Commission’s conclusions presented in the Progress Report on Croatia; welcomes the good overall progress that Croatia has made, particularly in the fields of judiciary and fundamental rights, competition, and justice, freedom and security;
7. s tem v zvezi podpira oblikovanje začasnega mehanizma finančne pomoči, prehodni vir, ki je namenjen krepitvi hrvaških upravnih in pravosodnih zmogljivosti za izvajanje in uveljavljanje zakonodaje EU;
Supports, in that connection, the creation of a temporary financial assistance mechanism, the Transition Facility, designed to strengthen Croatia’s administrative and judicial capacity to implement and enforce EU legislation;
11. pozdravlja oblikovanje posebnega začasnega schengenskega vira, ki bo podprl potrebne naložbe, ki jih bo morala Hrvaška opraviti za ohranjanje in krepitev zunanjih meja EU in za morebiten vstop v schengenski sistem;
Welcomes the creation of a special temporary Schengen facility supporting the necessary investments to be made by Croatia for the maintenance and reinforcement of the EU’s external borders and its eventual entry into the Schengen system;
14. ugotavlja, da se stališče Coreperja glede celotne ravni odhodkov za proračunsko leto 2013 ne bo spremenilo, vendar pa opozarja, da se med predstavljanjem, pogajanjem in sprejemanjem veljavnega večletnega finančnega okvira leta 2006 ni upoštevalo morebitnega pristopa Hrvaške v času njegove veljavnosti;
Notes Coreper’s position whereby the overall level of expenditure should not be changed for the financial year 2013, but recalls nevertheless that the current MFF did not take into account, when presented, negotiated and adopted in 2006, the potential accession of Croatia during the lifetime of this Multiannual Financial Framework;