natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2011
on the Commission Work Programme 2011
PE450.518v01-00 B7‑0690/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o delovnem programu Komisije za leto 2011
PE450.518v01-00 B7‑0690/2010 European Parliament resolution on the Commission Work Programme 2011
– ob upoštevanju delovnega programa Komisije za leto 2011 (COM (2010)623)), ki je bil sprejet 27. oktobra 2010, predsednik Evropske komisije pa ga je predstavil Parlamentu na drugem novembrskem delnem zasedanju,
– having regard to the Commission Work Programme 2011 (COM (2010 623) adopted on 27 October 2010, and presented by the President of the European Commission at Parliaments November II part-session,
– ob upoštevanju člena 110(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 110 (2) of its Rules of Procedure,
– ob upoštevanju strategije EU 2020,
– having regard to the “EU-2020 Strategy",
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU 2020,
– having regard to the EP’s resolution on “EU-2020 Strategy”,
– ob upoštevanju novega okvirnega sporazuma med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo, ki je bil sprejet 20. oktobra 2010,
– having regard to the new Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission adopted on 20 October 2010,
A. ker sedanja gospodarska, socialna in okoljska kriza bolj kot kdajkoli zahteva močno evropsko vodstvo in okrepljeno sodelovanje na ravni EU,
A. whereas the current economic, social and environmental crisis more than ever demands strong European leadership and enhanced cooperation at EU level,
B. ker trajnostnega izhoda iz krize ne moremo zagotoviti z uporabo politik, ki so to krizo povzročile; ker je zdaj pravi čas za ponovni razmislek o našem modelu za oblikovanje širšega političnega koncepta, kjer je treba ljudi in zaščito okolja postaviti v osredje oblikovanja politik ter si prizadevati za blaginjo in zagotovitev najboljših priložnosti za vse,
B. whereas there cannot be any sustainable exit from this crisis in resorting to the policies that led to it; whereas it would be timely to rethink our model towards a broader political concept, putting people and the protection of the environment at the centre of policy-making and aiming at creating wellbeing and the best opportunities for all,
C. ker je treba delovanje Evropske komisije meriti glede na izzive premagovanja te trojne krize, opredelitve vloge Evropske unije na svetovni revni s političnim delovanjem na področju človekovih pravic, razvoja, trgovine in zunanje politike ter oblikovanja Evropske unije, ki bo bolj demokratična in dostopna državljanom, kjer bodo zagotovljene njihove državljanske pravice, preglednost in demokratični nadzor, za vse to pa so potrebne nove ideje in odločno delovanje,
C. whereas the European Commission’s performance must be measured against the challenges of overcoming this triple crisis, as well as defining the role of the European Union on global level through policy action in the fields of human rights, development, trade and foreign policy, and in making the European Union a more democratic area, accessible to its citizens and guaranteeing their civil rights, assuring transparency and democratic scrutiny, all of which necessitates new ideas and firm action,
D. ker je sedanji zastoj pri pogajanjih o proračunu slabo znamenje za prihodnje pobude Komisije in poudarja potrebo po odločnejšemu vodenju Komisije,
D. whereas the current stalemate situation in the Budget negotiation is an ominous sign for the forthcoming Commission’s initiatives, thus emphasizing the need for a stronger Commission leadership,
E. ker je delovanje ekonomske in monetarne unije močno pod pritiskom zaradi nezmožnosti spoštovanja osnovnih pravil in dejstva, da obstoječi postopki za nadzor in usklajevanje niso dovolj izčrpni,
E. whereas the functioning of the Economic and Monetary Union has been under particular stress due to earlier failures to comply with the underlying rules and the fact that existing surveillance and coordination procedures have not been comprehensive enough,
F. ker je kriza poudarila potrebo po temeljitih, daljnosežnih in celovitih reformah na področju finančne regulacije in nadzora, da bi povečali nadzor in preglednost, omejili izpostavljenost tveganjem, preprečili finančne balone, da bi sredstva namenili resničnemu gospodarstvu ter spodbudili odgovorne in trajnostne finančne storitve,
F. whereas the crisis has highlighted the need of strong, far reaching and comprehensive reforms in the field of financial regulation and supervision in order to increase oversight, transparency, to limit risk exposure, to avoid financial bubbles, to streamline resources into the real economy and to promote responsible and sustainable financial services,
2. meni, da je svetovna gospodarska kriza izzvala sedanje mehanizme nadzora in usklajevanja ekonomske politike v EU in razkrila nekaj pomanjkljivosti na tem področju;
Deems that the global economic crisis has challenged the current mechanisms of economic policy surveillance and coordination in the EU and revealed several of its weaknesses;
4. pozdravlja sveženj predlogov o gospodarskem vodenju kot pogajalsko izhodišče za sozakonodajalce v EU; meni, da je treba večji poudarek dati fiskalni zdržnosti in strožjemu izpolnjevanju obveznosti, poleg tega pa je treba razširiti okvir usklajevanja gospodarske politike, da bi ustrezno upoštevali razvoj na širšem makroekonomskem področju, kot so na primer sedanja bilančna neravnovesja in kopičenje zasebnega dolga; glede na to meni, da je treba obravnavati problem čezmernega primanjkljaja in tudi presežka;
Welcomes the package of proposals on economic governance as a starting point for negotiations between EU co-legislators; is of the view that in addition to the need to strengthening the focus on fiscal sustainability and stricter compliance it is crucial to enlarge the scope of economic policy coordination in order to take proper account of broader macroeconomic developments such as current account imbalances and private debt accumulation; deems in this perspective that it is necessary to tackle excessive deficits as well as excessive surpluses;
7. je seznanjen z zakonodajnimi predlogi za revizijo direktive o trgih finančnih instrumentov in direktive o zlorabi trga; meni, da bi morali biti predlogi namenjeni krepitvi preglednosti na trgu, odločnemu zmanjšanju tržnega deleža zunajborznih transakcij in ustreznemu obravnavanju vprašanja špekulativnega trgovanja s surovinami;
Takes note on legislative proposals foreseen on the review of the Market in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) and the review of the Market Abuse Directive; deems that these proposals should strive towards enhanced market transparency, a drastic reduction of the market share of OTC transactions; as well as to tackle properly the issue of commodities speculation;
12. ugotavlja, da je večina strateških pobud o energiji za leto 2011 nezakonodajne narave, vendar pozdravlja zakonodajne predloge o energetski učinkovitosti in prihranku energije, ki naj vodijo v zmanjšanje porabe energije na svetovni ravni za vsaj 20 % do leta 2020; poziva Komisijo, naj takšna zakonodajna besedila sprejme dosti pred poletjem 2011, da bi zagotovili razpoložljivo zmanjšanje stroškov za potrošnike, da bi priznali, da je energetska učinkovitost najbolj gospodaren način za zmanjšanje odvisnosti od uvoza, ter da bi zagotovili konkurenčnost EU;
12. notes that most of the 2011 strategic initiatives on energy are of non-legislative nature, welcomes nevertheless the legislative proposals on energy efficiency and savings which must lead to a reduction of our global energy consumption by at least 20% by 2020; urges the Commission to adopt such legislative texts well before Summer 2011 in order to realise the available cost reductions for consumers, to recognise that energy efficiency is the most economic way to reduce import dependency and to insure EU competitiveness;
16. pozdravlja zakonodajno pobudo v podporo izvajanju inteligentnih omrežij; meni, da povečanje energetske učinkovitosti in uporabe obnovljivih virov energije EU zahteva nadgradnjo njene sedanje infrastrukture omrežij; poziva Komisijo, naj to zakonodajo sprejme leta 2011;
Welcomes the legislative initiative to support the implementation of smart grids; is of the opinion that the increase of energy efficiency and the uptake of renewable energy sources make it necessary that the EU upgrades its current grids infrastructure; urges the Commission to adopt this legislation in 2011;
18. je zelo razočaran zaradi zavlačevanja pri označevanju energetske učinkovitosti avtomobilov in zato poziva Komisijo, naj nemudoma poišče nove načine za boj proti učinkom prometa na podnebje;
Is very disappointed by the persistent delays in coming forward with car energy efficiency labelling, thus calls for the Commission to urgently to find new ways to tackle climate impact of transport;
22. je seznanjen z zavezo krepitvi gospodarskega vodenja in finančne regulacije, vendar opozarja, da sta gospodarska in finančna kriza povzročili tudi resno socialno krizo in visoko stopnjo brezposelnosti, zato poziva Komisijo, naj oblikuje konkretne predloge in zakonodajo za boj proti socialnim razsežnostim te krize;
Notes the commitment to strengthen economic governance and financial regulation, but recalls that the economic and financial crisis has also given rise to a serious social crisis and high level of unemployment, therefore calls on the Commission to come forward with concrete proposals and legislation to tackle the social side of the crisis as well;
25. pozdravlja dejstvo, da namerava Komisija oblikovati predlog za skupno konsolidirano davčno osnovo za podjetja, in opozarja da je treba to bazo dopolniti z minimalno davčno stopnjo;
Welcomes that the Commission intends to come forward with a proposal for a Common Consolidated Companies Tax Base (CCCTB), and recalls the need to complement the CCCTB with a minimum tax rate;
32. meni, da so glede na sedanjo revizijo mandata obstoječe agencije za upravljanje meja FRONTEX, ki zajema operativne in tehnične namene nadzora meja, predlagani instrumenti za kontrolo in nadzor meja odveč;
Deems excessive the proposed instruments on border control and surveillance, considering the ongoing revision of the mandate of existing FRONTEX border management Agency, consisting of both operational and technical purposes on border control;
Evropa v svetu
Europe in the world
42. podpira načela vključevanja, diferenciacije in pogojevanja, ki so temelj evropske sosedske politike; kljub temu pa poudarja, da bi morala biti vsa ta načela v tej politiki enako pomembna; zato obžaluje, da je pri odnosih z državami evropske sosedske politike pogojevanje vedno bolj v ozadju;
Supports the principals of inclusiveness, differentiation and conditionality that are at the base of the European Neighbourhood policy; points out, nevertheless, that all of them should be part of this policy with the same degree of importance; regrets, in this respect, that conditionality is more and more overshadowed when dealing with ENP countries;
44. obžaluje, da kljub obljubam ni bilo napredka pri odpravi osamitve turške skupnosti na Cipru; poziva Komisijo, naj podvoji svoja prizadevanja za sprejetje uredbe o neposredni trgovini in omogočanje gospodarskega razvoja severnega dela otoka, da bi zmanjšali sedanjo gospodarsko vrzel in položili temelje za celovito in trajnostno mirovno rešitev;
Regrets that in spite of the promises made, no progress was achieved as regards the end of the isolation of the Turkish Cypriot community; calls on the Commission to redouble its efforts in order to adopt the Direct Trade Regulation and facilitate the economic development of the northern part of the island with a view to alleviating the present economic gap and pave the way for a comprehensive and sustainable peace settlement;
46. poziva Komisijo, naj svojo trgovinsko politiko v prihodnosti oblikuje tako, da bo v celoti dosledna in skladna z najpomembnejšimi cilji na področju zmanjšanje revščine in doseganja razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; Komisijo poziva predvsem, naj pri trgovini ne uporablja enakega pristopa za vse, ampak naj uporabi načelo lastništva razvojnih strategij;
Urges the Commission to shape its future trade policy to ensure that it is fully consistent and coherent with the overriding objective of poverty alleviation and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals; in particular, calls on the Commission to refrain from a one-size-fits-all approach on trade, but to commit to the principle of ownership of development strategies;
48. opozarja, da davčne oaze, manipulacija tržnih cen in nezakonit beg kapitala močno ogrožajo razvoj revnih držav; obžaluje, ker Komisija ni pripravila novih pobud za ustrezno obravnavanje teh vprašanj; Komisijo poziva predvsem, naj razmisli o širšem nizu kazalcev in metod za obravnavanje manipulacije tržnih cen, med drugim tudi metode primerljivega donosa, ki so v uporabi v ZDA, in naj uvede mehanizme sankcioniranja za nekooperativne jurisdikcije po zgledu zakona ZDA o preprečevanju zlorabe davčnih oaz in za finančne institucije, ki poslujejo z davčnimi oazami;
Recalls that tax havens, trade mispricing and illicit capital flights represent a huge hindrance to development in poor countries; regrets that the Commission does not come up with new initiatives to address properly these issues; in particular, urges the Commission to consider a broader set of indicators and methods for tackling trade mispricing, among which the US "comparable profit methods"; to introduce a mechanism of sanctions both for non-cooperative jurisdictions, on the line of the US "Stop Tax Havens Abuse Act", and for financial institutions that operate with tax havens;
Izvajanje politik EU
Implementing EU policies
54. je prepričan, da je struktura proračuna EU in način financiranja zastarel in ni več primeren za odgovor na velike izzive, s katerimi se sooča EU, kot na primer podnebne spremembe, niti za izvajanje strategije EU 2020, ki so jo sprejele vse institucije; poudarja, da bi bila že zdavnaj potrebna temeljita reforma odhodkovne in prihodkovne strani proračuna EU, da bi se lahko celovito odzvali na sedanjo gospodarsko, socialno in okoljsko krizo in da bi preprečili kratkovidno razpravo o neto plačnikih, ki ne upošteva širših koristi izdatkov EU in s tem povezanih politik;
Is convinced that the structure of the EU budget and its way of financing is outdated and no longer fit neither to respond properly to the major challenges that the EU faces, such as climate change, nor to implement the EU 2020 strategy adopted by all institutions; points to the long overdue need of a thorough reform of both the spending and revenue side of the EU budget to give a comprehensive response to the current economic, social and environmental crisis and to end the short-sighted "net contributors" debate which fails to recognise the wider benefits of EU expenditure and underlying policies;
56. poudarja, da razprava o reformi odhodkovne in prihodkovne strani proračuna EU ne more biti ločena ter poziva k odprtemu in iskrenemu dialogu med institucijami o finančnem okviru po letu 2013 in novem sklepu o lastnih sredstvih; celoten postopek, vse do sprejetja teh instrumentov, naj bo brez tabujev in vnaprej določenih stališč;
Underlines that the discussion on reform of the spending and revenue side of the EU budget cannot be separated and calls for an open and frank dialogue between the institutions on both the post 2013 financial framework and the new own resources decision without taboo subjects and without pre-fixing of positions throughout the process leading to the adoption of these instruments;
o skupni strategiji EU-Afrika pred tretjim vrhunskim srečanjem Afrika-EU
on Joint Africa-EU Strategy before the 3rd Africa-EU Summit
PE450.522v01-00 B7‑0693/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupni strategiji EU-Afrika pred tretjim vrhunskim srečanjem Afrika-EU
PE450.522v01-00 B7‑0693/2010 European Parliament resolution on Joint Africa-EU Strategy before the 3rd Africa-EU Summit
– ob upoštevanju skupne strategije Afrike in EU („skupna strategija“) in prvega akcijskega načrta (2008–2010) za izvajanje strateškega partnerstva Afrike in EU, ki so ga sprejeli voditelji držav in vlad EU in Afrike na srečanju v Lizboni 8. in 9. decembra 2007,
- having regard to the Joint Africa-EU Strategy (‘Joint Strategy’) and the first Action Plan (2008-2010) for the implementation of the Africa-EU Strategic Partnership, adopted by EU and African heads of state and government meeting in Lisbon on 8 and 9 December 2007,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov s tretjega vrhunskega srečanja EU-Afrika v Tripoliju 29. in 30. novembra 2010,
- having regard to the conclusion of the 3rd EU-Africa Summit, held in Tripoli on 29-30 November 2010 ,
A. ker lahko skupna strategija EU-Afrika doseže visoko zastavljene cilje samo, če bodo ustrezno obravnavana odločilna vprašanja, ki so pogoj za razvoj te celine,
A. whereas the Joint Africa-EU strategy can only achieve its declared ambitions if crucial issues underpinning Africa’s development are properly addressed,
B. ker skupne strategije Afrika-EU minula desetletja sodelovanja med obema celinama niso izučila, pač pa je osredinjena samo na evropske gospodarske interese, kar kaže tudi evropski strateški dokument o trgovini z naslovom „Globalna Evropa: konkuriranje v svetu“,
B. whereas the Joint Africa-EU Strategy has not drawn lessons from past decades of cooperation between the two continents, mainly focused on European economic interest as the EU trade strategy document, entitled the ‘Global Europe: competing in the World’, shows,
C. ker evropska trgovinska strategija teži k zagotavljanju dostopa EU do surovin, ki jih posedujejo države v razvoju, in njihovih kmetijskih proizvodov, velikim evropskim podjetjem pa odpira trg teh držav na njihovo škodo,
C. whereas as the EU trade strategy foster to ensure EU’s access to developing countries’ raw materials including agricultural commodities by opening developing countries market to EU large companies at the expense of developing countries,
D. ker je dostop do trga EU za države v razvoju dejansko omejen samo na izvoz surovin, ki so manj obdavčene kot predelani izdelki, zaradi takšnega ravnanja pa se te države ujete v zanki večnega dobavitelja surovin za evropsko industrijo,
D. whereas EU market access for developing countries are in practice relegated to raw material export, which is less taxed compared to processed goods, and this policy is locking developing countries in a permanent provider of raw material status for EU industry,
E. ker nezakoniti beg kapitala in izogibanje davkom afriškim državam odteguje krvavo potrebna finančna sredstva, s katerimi bi lahko razvile socialno in gospodarsko infrastrukturo v zdravstvu, izobraževanju, zaposlovanju itd.,
E. whereas illicit capital flight and tax evasion continue depriving African countries from the badly needed financial resources to develop their social and economic infrastructures in the field of health, education, employment...etc,
1. obžaluje, da skupne strategije Afrika-EU minula desetletja sodelovanja med obema celinama niso izučila in da ni zmogla ustvariti novega odnosa, ki bi temeljil na dolgoročni viziji trajnostnega razvoja s pravičnimi, skladnimi, participativnimi ter socialno in okoljsko usmerjenimi področji politike;
Regrets that the Joint Africa-EU Strategy has not drawn lessons from past decades of cooperation between the two continents and failed to put forward a new relationship, based on long-term sustainable development vision, which implies fair, equitable, coherent, participatory, socially and environmentally sound policies;
4. poudarja, da pravična trgovina med EU in državami v razvoju pomeni pravično ceno za vire in kmetijske proizvode teh držav, torej ceno, ki bi odražala notranje in zunanje stroške, obenem pa bi morali biti zagotovljeni temeljni delovni standardi ILO ter varstvo okolja;
Points out that fair trade between EU and developing countries entails paying a fair price for the resources and agricultural products of the developing countries, i.e. a price which reflects the internal and external costs, while guaranteeing ILO core labour standard for working conditions as well as ensuring environment protection;
9. z obžalovanjem opaža, da EU še naprej sili v sprejetje sporazumov o gospodarskem partnerstvu, ne da bi pri tem upoštevala odpor afriških držav;
Observes with regret that the EU continues pushing for the conclusion of Economic Partnership Agreement with out taking into account African countries reluctance;
o skupni strategiji Afrike-EU po 3. vrhunskem srečanju Afrika-EU
on the Joint Africa-EU Strategy after the 3rd Africa-EU Summit
PE450.523v01-00 B7‑0694/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o skupni strategiji Afrike-EU po 3. vrhunskem srečanju Afrika-EU
PE450.523v01-00 B7‑0694/2010 European Parliament resolution on the Joint Africa-EU Strategy after the 3rd Africa-EU Summit
– ob upoštevanju skupne strategije Afrike in EU (skupna strategija) in drugega akcijskega načrta (2011–2013) za izvajanje strateškega partnerstva Afrike in EU ter skupne deklaracije o podnebnih spremembah, ki so ju sprejeli voditelji držav ter vlad EU in Afrike na srečanju v Tripoliju 29. in 30. novembra 2010,
– having regard to the Joint Africa-EU Strategy ("Joint Strategy") and the second Action Plan (2011 - 2013) for the implementation of the Africa-EU Strategic Partnership and the Joint Declaration on Climate Change, adopted by EU and African heads of state and government meeting in Tripoli, 29 - 30 November 2010,
– ob upoštevanju Sporazuma o partnerstvu med članicami skupine afriških, karibskih in pacifiških (AKP) držav na eni strani ter Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na drugi, podpisanega 23. junija 2000(3) v Cotonouju, in spremenjenega s sporazumom o spremembi Sporazuma o partnerstvu, podpisanim v Luxembourgu 25. junija 2005 (sporazum iz Cotonouja),
– having regard to the Partnership Agreement between the members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000(3), as amended by the Agreement amending the Partnership Agreement, signed in Luxembourg on 25 June 2005(4) (the "Cotonou Agreement"),
– ob upoštevanju obvestila z dne 16. februarja 2009 ad hoc odbora vseafriškega parlamenta za odnose z Evropskim parlamentom in ad hoc delegacije Evropskega parlamenta za odnose z vseafriškim parlamentom predsedstvoma Afriške unije in EU, Evropski komisiji in komisiji AU o vlogi vseafriškega in Evropskega parlamenta pri izvajanju in spremljanju skupne strategije,
– having regard to the note of 16 February 2009 from the Pan-African Parliament's ad-hoc committee for relations with the European Parliament and the European Parliament's ad-hoc delegation for relations with the Pan-African Parliament to the Presidencies-in-office of the African Union (AU) and EU, the European Commission and the Commission of the AU on the role of the Pan-African and European Parliaments in the implementation and monitoring of the Joint Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 24. marca 2009 z naslovom Eno leto po Lizboni uresničevanje partnerstva med Afriko in EU,
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 24 March 2009 "One year after Lisbon: The Africa-EU partnership at work",
– ob upoštevanju skupnega sporočila o poročilu s 15. srečanja ministrske trojke Afrika-EU v Adis Abebi, v Etiopiji,
– having regard to the Joint Communiqué of the 15th Africa-EU Ministerial Troika Report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,
– ob upoštevanju skupnem vmesnem pregledu skupne strategije Afrike in EU,
– having regard to the Joint Mid-Term Review of the Joint Africa-EU Strategy,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega sporočila o poročilu s 12. srečanja ministrske trojke Afrika-EU dne 28. aprila 2009,
– having regard to the Joint Communiqué of the 12th Africa-EU Ministerial Troika Meeting, 28.04.09,
– ob upoštevanju strateškega načrta AU za obdobje 2009–2012,
– having regard to the AU Strategic Plan 2009-2012,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za razvoj o drugem pregledu partnerskega sporazuma AKP-ES (2009/2165),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Development "on the second revision of the Partnership Agreement ACP-EC" (2009/2165),