natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da so potrebne jasnejše in strožje omejitve izmenjave informacij med državami članicami in uporabe skupnih registrov EU; je mnenja, da bi v nasprotnem primeru z oblikovanjem obsežnih registrov na ravni EU lahko ogrozili osebno nedotakljivost in da bi registri lahko postali neuporabni, hkrati pa bi se povečalo tveganje uhajanja informacij in korupcije;
Stresses the need for clearer and tighter limits on exchanges of information between Member States and the use of common EU registers; takes the view that, otherwise, building up large registers at EU level is liable to threaten personal integrity and registers may become ineffective whilst the risk of leaks and corruption will increase;
države članice poziva, naj okrepijo medsebojno spoštovanje in zaupanje v sposobnost drugih krepiti varnost; meni, da je medsebojno zaupanje odvisno od učinkovitega in strogega ter nenehnega ocenjevanja učinkovitosti in rezultatov dejavnosti različnih držav članic;
Calls on Member States to reinforce mutual trust and confidence in each other's capability to strengthen security; considers that mutual trust also depends upon an efficient and rigorous ongoing evaluation of the effectiveness and results of the actions of various Member States;
meni, da morajo prednostne naloge na področju civilnega pravosodja predvsem zadovoljiti potrebe, ki jih izražajo posamezni državljani in podjetja, ob hkratnem nenehnem poenostavljanju pravosodnih mehanizmov in oblikovanju enostavnejših, jasnejših in dostopnejših postopkov, da se zagotovita ustrezno spoštovanje temeljnih pravic in varstvo potrošnikov; zato – četudi pozdravlja odločitev Komisije, da predstavi predlog o oporokah in dedovanju ter Zeleno knjigo o ureditvah skupnega premoženja zakoncev v povezavi s prenehanjem življenjske skupnosti in razvezo – poziva k:
Considers that the priorities in the field of civil justice must first and foremost meet the needs expressed by individual citizens and business whilst constantly simplifying the machinery of justice and creating simpler, clearer and more accessible procedures in order to guarantee the proper enforcement of fundamental rights and consumer protection; to this end, while commending the Commission's decisions to present a proposal on wills and successions and a Green Paper on matrimonial property regimes in connection with separation and divorce, calls for:
nadaljnjim prizadevanjem za spodbujanje alternativnega reševanja sporov, ki bodo usmerjena zlasti v izboljšanje dostopa do pravosodja za potrošnike; uvedbi ukrepov za kolektivna pravna sredstva na ravni Skupnosti, da se državljanom in podjetjem zagotovi boljši dostop do sodnega varstva, hkrati pa ugotavlja, da ti ukrepi ne smejo privesti do nepotrebne drobitve nacionalnega procesnega prava;
further efforts to promote alternative dispute resolution aiming in particular at improving access to justice for consumers; the introduction of collective redress mechanisms at Community level so as to grant citizens and businesses greater access to justice, whilst noting that this must not lead to unnecessary fragmentation of national procedural law;
podrobnemu razmisleku o obliki začasnega ukrepa Skupnosti, ki bi dopolnjeval ukrepe, ki jih lahko naložijo nacionalna sodišča, o različnih nacionalnih pravnih pristopih do pridržanja lastninske pravice in drugih podobnih mehanizmov, o priznavanju mednarodnih posvojitev in o celotnem vprašanju medsebojnega priznavanja nacionalnih listin o osebnem stanju;
detailed consideration to be given to a form of Community provisional measure additional to those which may be ordered by national courts, to the divergent national legal approaches to retention of title and other similar mechanisms, to the recognition of international adoptions, and to the whole question of the mutual recognition of national civil status documents;
kodeksu Skupnosti o koluzijskih pravilih, ki bi v enem instrumentu združeval vse predpise, ki bi jih zakonodajalec Skupnosti na tem področju sprejel do leta 2013, kar bi obeležilo 45. obletnico bruseljske konvencije, sprejetje katere je bil mejnik za mednarodno zasebno pravo;
a Community Conflicts Code bringing together in one instrument all the regulations adopted in this area by the Community legislator by 2013 to mark the 45th anniversary of the Brussels Convention, the conclusion of which was a milestone in private international law;
preučevanju praktične uporabe velike količine nove zakonodaje, ki je bila doslej sprejeta na področju evropskih civilnih postopkov, da se jo poenostavi, kjer je to mogoče, in kodificira v en sam instrument, ki bo združeval celotno zakonodajo Skupnosti na tem področju;
the practical application of the large amount of innovative legislation adopted to date in the field of European civil procedure, to be studied with a view to simplifying it where possible and codifying it into a single instrument bringing together all the Community legislation adopted in this area;
vztraja, da se z odpravo postopka za priznanje sodnih odločb v povezavi uredbo Bruselj I Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 44/2001 z dne 22. decembra 2000 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v civilnih in gospodarskih zadevah, (UL L 12, 16.1.2001, str.
Insists that the abolition of exequatur in the context of the Brussels I Regulation Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p.
ne bi smelo hiteti in da bi jo morala spremljati ustrezna varovala;
should not be rushed and should be accompanied by appropriate safeguards;
bi želel pregledati predloge o vzpostavitvi izbirne 28. sheme za zadeve civilnega prava s čezmejnimi razsežnostmi na področju družinskega prava, pravic posameznika in prava intelektualne lastnine;
Would be keen to examine proposals to draw up an optional 28th scheme for civil-law issues with cross-border aspects in areas affecting family law, the rights of individuals and property law;
poudarja, da je treba še naprej spodbujati mednarodno prisotnost EU na pravnem področju prek globalnih rešitev in večstranskih instrumentov; meni, da je še posebej pomembno tesno sodelovanje z mednarodnimi organizacijami, kot sta Haaška konferenca o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu in Svet Evrope; nadalje meni, da bi morala EU spodbujati in podpirati pristop tretjih držav, zlasti iz soseščine EU, k mednarodnim pravosodnim sporazumom, in da je to izjemnega pomena predvsem na področju družinskega prava in zaščite otrok;
Underlines the need to further promote the international presence of the EU in the legal field by way of global solutions and multilateral instruments; believes that close cooperation with international organisations, such as the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the Council of Europe, is of particular importance; believes further that the EU should encourage and support the accession of third countries, especially those neighbouring the EU, to international judicial agreements, and that this is of key importance, especially in the field of family law and child protection;
ponovno poudarja, da bi Komisija morala dati na razpolago osnutek skupnega referenčnega okvira v čim večjem številu ustreznih jezikov, skupaj z drugimi znanstvenimi deli, da bi zagotovila njihovo dostopnost za vse zainteresirane strani, treba bi jih bilo pa tudi uporabiti kot neobvezne instrumente za evropskega in nacionalne zakonodajalce; vztraja, da se ustrezne določbe osnutka skupnega referenčnega okvira že sedaj sistematično in natančno upoštevajo pri vseh nadaljnjih predlogih Komisije in ocenah učinka, ki vplivajo na pogodbeno pravo;
Reiterates that the DCFR should be made available by the Commission in the greatest possible number of relevant languages along with other scientific works in order to ensure their accessibility for all interested stakeholders and should already be used as a non-binding legal tool for European and national legislators; insists that already now the relevant provisions of the DCFR be given systematic and detailed consideration in all forthcoming Commission proposals and impact assessments affecting contract law;
spodbuja Komisijo, naj vztraja pri svoji nedavni zamisli o predlaganju standardnih pogodb, ki naj se prostovoljno uporabijo v specifičnih sektorjih na temelju skupnega referenčnega okvira;
Encourages the Commission to pursue its recent idea of proposing standard contracts for voluntary use in specific sectors on the basis of the CFR;
poudarja, da mora biti evropska zakonodaja na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja najvišje možne kakovosti in da mora temeljiti na ustrezno opravljeni oceni učinka, da se državljanom in podjetjem dajo na voljo učinkovita sredstva; obžaluje dejstvo, da v preteklosti na tem področju niso bile izvedene ustrezne ocene; je seznanjen z napredkom, ki je bil nedavno dosežen, in se zavezuje, da bo v kratkem natančno preučil eno izmed ocen učinkov, ki jih je izvedla Komisija;
Stresses the need for European legislation in the area of judicial cooperation to be of the highest possible quality and based on properly conducted impact assessments, in order to provide citizens and business with effective instruments; deplores the fact that, in the past, proper impact assessments were not conducted in this area; notes a recent improvement and undertakes to subject one Commission impact assessment to critical analysis in the coming period;
je trdno prepričan, da bi bilo treba za zagotovitev minimalne ravni neodvisnega pregleda pri sestavi ocen učinka ustanoviti odbor neodvisnih strokovnjakov, ki bi s pomočjo naključnih kontrol nadzoroval kakovost mnenj, ki bi jih podal odbor za oceno učinka, ter da bi moralo biti predstavnikom zainteresiranih strani omogočeno, da pri izvajanju ocen nudijo pomoč;
Strongly believes that, in order to guarantee a minimum level of independent scrutiny in the drafting of impact assessments, an independent panel of experts should be set up to monitor, by means of spot checks, the quality of opinions delivered by the Impact Assessment Board, and that representatives of interested parties should also be allowed to assist in conducting them;
meni, da je pravno sodelovanje ključno za medsebojno približevanje ne le civilnih, temveč tudi kazenskih postopkov različnih držav članic; zato meni, da bi bilo treba enako spodbujati približevanje postopkovnih pravic državljanov v različnih državah članicah, tako v civilnih kot v kazenskih postopkih;
Considers that legal cooperation is the key to bringing not only the civil, but also the criminal procedures of different Member States closer to each other; considers therefore, that the approximation of procedural rights of citizens between the Member States should be promoted equally in civil and criminal proceedings;
poziva k oblikovanju evropske pravosodne kulture, ki bo zajemala vse vidike prava; s tem namenom poudarja, da:
Calls for the creation of a European judicial culture embracing all aspects of the law; to this end, points out that:
lahko mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč, evropska mreža svetov za pravosodje, združenje državnih svetov in vrhovnega upravnega sodstva ter mreža evropskih generalnih državnih tožilcev Eurojustice, pravosodni delavci in odvetniki ponudijo zelo veliko z usklajevanjem in spodbujanjem poklicnega usposabljanja za pravosodje ter medsebojnim razumevanjem pravnih sistemov drugih držav članic ter z omogočanjem lažjega reševanja čezmejnih sporov in težav, njihove dejavnosti pa je treba spodbujati in zadostno financirati; to mora pripeljati do načrta za evropsko pravosodno usposabljanje, ki bo financirano v celoti in oblikovano v povezavi z omenjenimi pravosodnimi mrežami, ne da bi pri tem po nepotrebnem podvajali programe in strukture, in ki bo vodilo v oblikovanje evropske akademije za pravosodje, ki bo vključevala evropsko mrežo za sodniško usposabljanje in evropsko pravno akademijo;
the Network of the Presidents of the Supreme Judicial Courts, the European Network of the Councils for the Judiciary, the Association of the Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions and the Eurojustice network of European Prosecutors-General, court officers and legal practitioners have a huge amount to offer by coordinating and promoting professional training for the judiciary and mutual understanding of other Member States" legal systems and making it easier to resolve cross-border disputes and problems, and their activities must be facilitated and receive sufficient funding; this must lead to a fully-funded plan for European judicial training drawn up in liaison with the above-mentioned judicial networks, avoiding unnecessary duplication of programmes and structures and leading to the creation of a European Judicial Academy composed of the European Judicial Training Network and the Academy of European Law;
treba je oblikovati aktivne politike za pospeševanje medsebojnega znanja in razumevanja tujega prava in tako doseči večjo pravno varnost in gojiti vzajemno zaupanje, ki je bistveno za medsebojno priznavanje; te politike morajo zagotavljati izmenjavo izkušenj, izmenjave oseb, obiske in informacije ter učne programe za odvetnike in sodnike, pa tudi usklajevanje obstoječih nacionalnih sistemov za omogočanje pravosodnega usposabljanja po EU in organizacijo tečajev za odvetnike in sodnike za seznanitev z nacionalnim pravom;
there must be active policies designed to foster mutual knowledge and understanding of foreign law and so achieve greater legal certainty and foster the mutual trust essential for mutual recognition; these policies must provide for exchanges of experiences, exchanges, visits and information and courses for practitioners and the judiciary, as well as coordination of existing national regimes for legal training across the EU and provision of familiarisation courses in national law for legal practitioners and judges;
poziva Komisijo, naj univerze ter druge visokošolske inštitute in strokovna združenja spodbuja k vzpostavitvi skupnega sistema točk/kreditnih točk pri usposabljanju pravosodnih delavcev in sodnikov; Komisijo nadalje poziva, naj po Evropski uniji vzpostavi mrežo organov za usposabljanje na področju pravosodja, ki bodo pristojni za redno organizacijo tečajev za odvetnike in sodnike za seznanitev z nacionalnim, primerjalnim in evropskim pravom;
Calls on the Commission, therefore, to promote the creation by universities, other specialised institutes of higher education and competent professional organisations of a common system of training points/credits for judges and legal practitioners; calls on the Commission to create a network of legal training bodies across the Union accredited to provide familiarisation courses in national, comparative and European law for practitioners and judges on a stable, ongoing basis;
poziva k povečanju prizadevanj za spodbujanje in razvoj e-pravosodja na ravni Skupnosti zaradi dostopnosti sodnega varstva za državljane in podjetja in meni, da:
Calls for a greater effort to promote and develop e-justice at Community level, in the interests of access to justice for citizens and business, and considers that:
bi morale države članice, ki sodelujejo pri dvostranskih projektih, zagotoviti, da bo njihovo delo zasnovano tako, da ga bo mogoče prenesti na raven Skupnosti, da se prepreči nepotrebno podvajanje;
Member States cooperating on bilateral projects should ensure that their work is designed in a way that is transferable to the Community level, in order to avoid unnecessary duplication;
in alternativno reševanje sporov, sprejeti pa bi bilo treba tudi ukrepe na področjih elektronskih aktov in preglednosti sredstev dolžnikov; cilj bi moral biti, da se dosežejo enostavnejši, cenejši in hitrejši civilni postopki v čezmejnih zadevah;
and alternative dispute resolution, and action should be taken in the areas of electronic acts and transparency of debtors" assets; the aim should be to bring about simpler, cheaper and faster civil proceedings in cross-border cases;
bi bilo treba nadalje razvijati elektronska orodja, kot sta evropski informacijski sistem kazenskih evidenc in schengenski informacijski sistem;
electronic tools such as the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) and the Schengen Information System should be further developed;
meni, da bi moralo e-pravosodje olajšati dostop državljanov do pravne pomoči, skrajšati sodne postopke in povečal njihovo učinkovitost in zato zahteva, da bodoči večjezični portal e-pravosodja vključuje dostop do podatkovnih zbirk, elektronskih sodnih in izvensodnih sredstev, inteligentnih sistemov, ki bodo državljanom pomagali pri soočanju s pravnimi vprašanji, ter dostop do obsežnih registrov, imenikov odvetnikov ter enostavnih vodnikov po pravnih sistemih vseh držav članic;
Considers that e-justice should simplify citizens" access to legal assistance, shorten judicial procedures and improve the efficiency of the judicial process, and therefore calls on the future multilingual e-justice portal to incorporate access to legal databases, electronic judicial and non-judicial remedies, intelligent systems designed to help citizens find out how to deal with legal problems, and comprehensive registers, directories of legal professionals and plain guides to the legal system of each Member State;
meni, da bi moral biti portal oblikovan tudi kot orodje za sodnike, sodne uradnike, uradnike nacionalnih ministrstev za pravosodje in odvetnike, ki bi jim bilo treba zagotoviti varen dostop do dela portala, ki jih zadeva; poziva, da se na tem delu portala omogoči varno komuniciranje, uporaba video konferenc in izmenjava dokumentacije med sodišči ter med sodišči in strankami v postopkih (dematerializacija postopkov), da se omogoči preverjanje elektronskih podpisov ter da se zagotovi ustrezne sisteme preverjanja in sredstva za izmenjavo podatkov;
Considers that the portal should also be designed for use as a tool by judges, court officials, officials of the national Ministries of Justice and practising lawyers, all of whom would be entitled to secure access to the relevant part of the portal; calls on this part of the portal to permit secure communication, video-conferencing and document exchange between courts and between courts and parties to proceedings (dematerialisation of proceedings), to allow for verification of electronic signatures and make provision for appropriate verification systems, and to afford a means of exchanging information;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo vsa bodoča zakonodaja na področju civilnega prava oblikovana na način, da se bo lahko uporabljala v spletnih aplikacijah, v katerih bo treba vnesti karseda malo prostega besedila; poziva k sprejetju ukrepov, namenjenih temu, da bodo, kjer je to potrebno, na voljo pomoč preko spleta v vseh uradnih jezikih ter spletne prevajalske storitve; enako bi morali biti v primerih, ko je potrebno vročanje listin, predvideni ukrepi za to, da bi bilo mogoče vročati listine in obveščati prek elektronske pošte ter da bi bilo omogočeno elektronsko podpisovanje, kjer je potrebno ustno pričanje, pa bi bilo treba spodbujati uporabo video konferenc; nadalje meni, da bi morali vsi prihodnji predlogi vključevati obrazloženo izjavo Komisije, da je bil opravljen pregled o tem, kako prijazno je e-pravosodje do uporabnika.
Calls on the Commission to ensure that all future legislation in the field of civil law is designed in such a way that it can be used in on-line applications requiring a minimal amount of free text to be filled in; calls on action to ensure that, where necessary, on-line help is provided in all official languages and on-line electronic translation services are available; by the same token, where there is a need to provide for service of documents, provision should be made to ensure that documents can be served and communications effected by electronic mail and signatures provided electronically and, where there is a need for oral testimony, the use of video-conferencing should be encouraged; considers, furthermore, that all future proposals should include a reasoned statement by the Commission that an audit of e-justice-friendliness has been carried out;
poziva k temu, da se v Evropskem informacijskem sistemu kazenskih evidenc nameni pomembno mesto evidencam o nasilju, vezanemu na spol;
Calls for the ECRIS to give a prominent place to records of gender violence;
Prednostne naloge v kazenskem pravosodju
Priorities in criminal justice
poziva k vzpostavitvi območja kazenskega pravosodja EU, ki bo temeljilo na spoštovanju temeljnih pravic, načelu vzajemnega priznavanja in potrebi po ohranitvi doslednosti nacionalnih kazenskopravnih sistemov, razvije pa se z:
Calls for the construction of an EU criminal justice area based on respect for fundamental rights, the principle of mutual recognition, and the need to maintain the coherence of national systems of criminal law, to be developed through:
ambicioznim pravnim instrumentom za procesna jamstva v kazenskih postopkih, ki temelji na domnevi nedolžnosti, s katero se v celoti upoštevajo pravice obrambe,
an ambitious legal instrument on procedural safeguards in criminal proceedings, based on the presumption of innocence, which gives full effect to the rights of the defence,
trdnim pravnim okvirom, da se zagotovi spoštovanje temeljnega načela
a sound legal framework ensuring the basic principle of
in da se olajšajo prenos kazenskih postopkov med državami članicam in rešitev sporov o pristojnosti ter hkrati visoka raven jamstev in pravic obrambe, ter da se zagotovi učinkovit dostop do teh pravic in do sredstev za uveljavljanje pravic,
and facilitating the transfer of criminal proceedings between Member States and the resolution of conflicts of jurisdiction, with a high level of guarantees and defence rights, and ensuring effective access to these rights and to legal redress mechanisms,
celovitim pravnim okvirom, ki bo žrtvam kaznivih dejanj, zlasti žrtvam terorizma, organiziranega kriminala, trgovine z ljudmi in nasilja, vezanega na spol, ponujal najširše mogoče varstvo, vključno z ustreznim nadomestilom, ki naj bo zagotovljeno na ravni držav članic,
a comprehensive legal framework offering victims of crime and in particular victims of terrorism, organised crime, trafficking in human beings and gender violence, the widest possible protection, including adequate compensation, to be provided for at Member State level,
skupnim pravnim okvirom, ki bo pričam ponujal najširše mogoče varstvo,
a common legal framework offering witnesses the widest protection,
minimalnimi standardi za pogoje v zaporu in priporu ter skupen niz pravic zapornikov v EU, vključno z ustrezno odškodnino za neupravičeno priprte ali obsojene osebe, ki jih podpirajo sklenitev sporazumov med EU in tretjimi državami o vrnitvi njihovih državljanov, ki so bili obsojeni, popolno izvrševanje Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2008/909/PNZ z dne 27. novembra 2008 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja sodb v kazenskih zadevah, s katerimi so izrečene zaporne kazni ali ukrepi, ki vključujejo odvzem prostosti, za namen njihovega izvrševanja v Evropski uniji UL L 327, 5.12.2008, str.
minimum standards for prison and detention conditions and a common set of prisoners" rights in the EU, including appropriate compensation rules for persons unjustly detained or convicted, bolstered by the conclusion of agreements between the EU and third countries for the return of their convicted nationals, the full implementation of Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union OJ L 327, 5.12.2008, p.
in dodelitev zadostnih sredstev EU tako za izgradnjo novih prostorov za odvzem prostosti v državah članicah, ki imajo prepolne zapore (v zvezi z regionalnimi varnostnimi načrti), kot tudi za izvrševanje programov resocializacije,
and the provision of sufficient EU funding for both the construction, in the context of regional security plans, of new detention facilities in Member States affected by prison overcrowding and the implementation of social resettlement programmes,