natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je treba socialni sveženj za spodbujanje socialnega napredka, ki bo res nekaj pomenil, dopolniti s podpornimi ekonomskimi in strukturnimi ukrepi; meni, da je treba razveljaviti pakt stabilnosti in rasti ter da mora Evropska centralna banka omiliti svojo politiko, da bi se zoperstavila učinkom gospodarskega upočasnjevanja v Evropi; poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pripravita evropski investicijski program za trajnostni razvoj, zaposlovanje in socialno vključenost, ki bo znašal vsaj 1% BDP EU in ki bi ga dopolnili s podobnimi javnimi investicijskimi programi držav članic, da bi utrdili gospodarstvo in ukrepali proti podnebnim spremembam ter spodbujali polno zaposlenost s kakovostnimi delovnimi mesti in socialnimi pravicami; predlaga, da bi poleg tega države članice uvedle ukrepe za stabilizacijo in izboljšanje kupne moči tistih z nizkimi dohodki (naraščanje cen hrane, energije, prevoza), npr. z uvedbo socialnih tarif za plin, elektriko, telekomunikacije, javni prevoz itd.;
Points out that any meaningful 'Social Package' promoting social progress must be complemented by supportive economic and structural policy measures; considers that the Stability and Growth Pact must be revoked and that the monetary policy of the ECB must be relaxed in order to counter the effects of the current economic slowdown in Europe; calls on the Commission and the Council to draw up a 'European Investment Programme for Sustainable Development, Employment and Social Inclusion' to which at least 1% of EU GDP should be allocated, which should be complemented by similar public investment programmes of the Member States in order to stabilise the economy, counter climate change and promote full employment with quality jobs and social rights; proposes that Member States also introduce measures to stabilise and enhance the purchasing power of people on low incomes (faced with rising prices of food, energy and transport), for example by introducing social default tariffs for gas, electricity, telecommunications, public transport, etc.;
opozarja, da se bo sedanja lizbonska strategija Evropske unije iztekla leta 2010; meni, da je treba zdaj začeti resno razmišljati o prihodnji strategiji za obdobje po letu 2010; poudarja, da je treba opustiti osredotočenost na liberalizacijo trga in konkurenčnost in jo nadomestiti z novo celovito evropsko strategijo za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj, ki bo temeljila na štirih enako pomembnih stebrih (gospodarstvo, okolje, zaposlovanje, socialna zaščita in socialna vključenost);
Notes that the current Lisbon Strategy of the European Union is due to expire in 2010; considers that a thorough reflection must start now on the future strategy for the period after 2010; emphasises that the current focus on market liberalisation and 'competitiveness' must be abandoned and replaced by a new integrated European Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development which is based on four pillars assigned equal weight (the economy, the environment, employment, social protection and social inclusion);
ki ga predlagajo Esko Seppänen, Bairbre de Brún, Roberto Musacchio in Miloslav Ransdorf
by Esko Seppänen, Bairbre de Brún, Roberto Musacchio and Miloslav Ransdorf
ker cena energije vpliva na ceno večine blaga in izdelkov;
whereas the price of energy affects the cost of most commodities and goods,
ker bo po napovedih cena zemeljskega plina v prihodnji kurilni sezoni bistveno višja kot v prejšnjih kurilnih sezonah,
whereas the price of natural gas is forecast to increase significantly in the coming heating season relative to the previous heating season,
ker se bo v prihodnjih letih energetska kriza zaostrila in poglobila; ker viri niso neizčrpni in ker je treba najti rešitev za to težavo,
whereas, in the years to come, the energy crisis will worsen and become increasingly acute, whereas resources are not inexhaustible and whereas a solution to this problem needs to be found,
ker smo priča dvigu cen goriv, kakršnega še ni bilo, ta nezaslišana porast pa uničujoče vpliva na gospodarsko dejavnost v različnih sektorjih: promet in druge storitve, industrija, kmetijstvo in ribištvo,
whereas we are witnessing an unprecedented rise in fuel prices, and this scandalous surge is having a devastating effect on economic activity in various sectors: transport and other services, industry, agriculture and fisheries,
ugotavlja, da se svet približuje vrhu svetovnega pridobivanja nafte, kar pomeni, da oskrba z nafto ne sledi povpraševanju ter da so cene nafte in ostalih fosilnih goriv trajno visoke;
Notes that the world is approaching the so called oil-peak situation, which means that the supply of oil does not match the demand and the prices of oil and other fossil fuels are permanently high;
opozarja, da so izpeljani finančni instrumenti v zvezi z nafto, katerih vrednost je kar šestkrat višja od dejanskega trgovanja z nafto, zelo špekulativni in ustvarjajo pretrese na trgu;
Points out that the oil price derivatives, the turnover of which has been as much as six times higher than real trade, are highly speculative and create market turbulences;
ugotavlja, da je usklajevanje trgov z električno energijo in plinom sestavni del procesa liberalizacije evropskih energetskih trgov;
Notes that the harmonisation of the electricity and gas markets is an integral part of the liberalisation process of the European energy markets;
ugotavlja, da je glavno orodje pri liberalizaciji in usklajevanju energetskih trgov oblikovanje veleprodajnih cen električne energije in plina; ugotavlja, da se bo največ trgovanja z energijo odvijalo na borzah energije; ugotavlja, da je pri takšnih izmenjavah cena električne energije neodvisna od splošnih ali povprečnih stroškov proizvodnje ter je odvisna od ponudbe in povpraševanja z mnogimi špekulativnimi dejavniki;
Notes that the main tool in liberalising and harmonising the energy markets is the price formation of wholesale electricity and gas; notes that the main trading places in the electricity markets will be the energy exchanges; notes that in such exchanges the price of electricity is independent of the general or average production costs and dependent on supply and demand with many speculative elements;
ugotavlja, da je cilj usklajevanja doseči podoben način oblikovanja cen električne energije in plina v vseh državah EU; ugotavlja, da to ne prinaša nižjih cen v vseh državah članicah, temveč prinaša povečanje cen v tistih državah, kjer je energija zaenkrat cenejša od povprečja EU;
Notes that the aim of the harmonisation is to have electricity and gas priced in a similar way in all EU countries; notes that it does not result in lower prices in all Member States but results in price increases in those countries where energy is currently cheaper than in the EU on average;
poudarja, da na veleprodajnem promptnem trgu vsak akter da ponudbo, ki vključuje ceno in količino električne energijo, ki jo je mogoče dobaviti po tej ceni, ter da borza potem ponudnikom podeljuje pogodbe o oskrbi, začenši z najnižjo ponudbo, dokler ni zadoščeno predvidenemu povpraševanju; ugotavlja, da ponudba zadnje elektrarne, ki ji je podeljena pogodba, določi ceno vseh pogodb in torej isto ceno za vso električno energijo; poudarja, da elektrarne niso plačane glede na svojo ponudbo, temveč glede na ponudbo obrobnega proizvajalca z najvišjimi spremenljivimi stroški;
Points out that in the wholesale spot market each operator submits a bid that comprises a price and the amount of electricity which can be supplied at that price, and the exchange then rewards the bidders with supply contracts, starting with the lowest bid, until the predicted demand is satisfied; notes that the bid of the last plant that receives a contract determines the price of all contracts, creating the same price for all electricity; points out that the power plants are not paid according to their own bid but according to the bid of the marginal producer with the highest variable costs;
ugotavlja, da ta sistem oblikovanja cen, ki je glavni dejavnik usklajenega trga z električno energijo, daje neupravičeno prednost hidroelektrarnam in jedrskim elektrarnam z nizkimi spremenljivimi stroški, saj prodajo električno energijo po isti ceni kot elektrarne, ki jo proizvajajo z dražjima nafto in premogom;
Notes that this price formation system, which is the key element of the harmonised electricity market, unduly favours hydro and nuclear power plants with their low variable costs, as they get the same price for electricity as those generating electricity by more expensive oil and coal;
poziva Komisijo, naj uvede alternativne možnosti takšnemu oblikovanju cen, ki zaradi svoje avtomatičnosti omogoča ogromne izredne dobičke energetskim gigantom;
Calls on the Commission to introduce alternatives for this kind of price formation, the automatic nature of which is the source of huge windfall profits for the energy giants;
ugotavlja, da so v sistemu trgovanja z emisijami temeljne težave; ugotavlja, da sistem licitiranja povzroča listinjenje dovoljenj za emisije; ugotavlja, da lahko pri licitiranju sodelujejo vse zainteresirane strani, tudi finančni špekulanti;
Notes the built-in problems in the Emission Trading Scheme, notes that the auctioning system creates the securitisation of the emission allowances; notes that in auctions all the interested parties, including the financial speculators, are allowed to participate in the bidding;
opozarja, da visoke in špekulativne cene licitiranih dovoljenj za emisije proizvajalcem energije ne povzročajo nobenih težav, temveč ravno nasprotno, saj jim sistem oblikovanja cen omogoča vključevanje cene dovoljenj za emisije v ceno vse električne energije neodvisno od emisij, ustvarjenih pri proizvodnji električne energije;
Points out that the high and speculative price of the auctioned emission allowance does not create any problems for the energy generators, rather the contrary, because the price formation system allows them to include the price of emission allowances in the price of all electricity, independently of the emissions created in the generation of electricity;
ugotavlja, da se po licitiranju z dovoljenji za emisije trguje na borzah energije; ugotavlja, da takšen sekundarni trg vnaša špekulativne dejavnike v sistem oblikovanja cen; opozarja, da listinjenje dovoljenj za emisije ustvarja tudi možnost trgovanja z njimi kot izpeljanimi finančnimi instrumenti;
Notes that, after auctioning, emission allowances are traded in the energy exchanges; notes that this kind of secondary market also brings the speculative element inside the price formation system; points out that the securitisation of emission allowances also creates a possibility of trading them as financial derivatives;
opozarja na mnoge dokazane špekulativne nepravilnosti na borzah energije, zlasti pri prostem trgovanju;
Points out the many proven speculative wrongdoings in energy exchanges, especially in the over-the-counter trade;
poziva Komisijo, naj uvede strog javni nadzor nad prostim trgovanjem, nad katerim zaenkrat ni nobenega nadzora;
Calls on the Commission to introduce strict public control over OTC trading, which is currently totally free of any control;
poziva Komisijo, naj reagira na težave določanja veleprodajnih cen električne energije na liberaliziranem in usklajenem trgu ter vzpostavi pravila, ki bodo izločila špekulativne dejavnike licitiranja; meni, da je predlagani sekundarni trg za razdeljevanje dovoljenj za emisije neučinkovit in špekulativen;
Requests the Commission to react to the problems of the wholesale pricing of electricity in a liberalised and harmonised market and to create rules to eliminate the speculative elements of auctioning; considers the proposed secondary market for distributing emission allowances ineffective and speculative;
poziva Komisijo, naj poda predloge za preprečitev pomanjkanja energije pri evropskih potrošnikih kot posledica neupravičenih podražitev električne energije in plina;
Requests the Commission to put forward proposals preventing energy poverty among the European consumers as a result of the undue price increases for electricity and gas;
poziva Komisijo, naj z ukrepi podpre konkurenčnost evropskih podjetij v primerjavi z njihovimi tekmeci na svetovnem trgu;
Requests the Commission to act to uphold the competitiveness of European industries in relation to their counterparts in the global market;
zahteva, da se načelo odgovornosti povzročitelja obremenitve vključi v vse vidike energetskih trgov, vendar meni, da je nedopustno, da bi morala gospodinjstva in podjetja plačati za finančne špekulacije pri ceni energije namesto zgolj za onesnaževanje podnebja;
Requests that the ‘polluter-pays’ principle should be adopted in all aspects of the energy markets but considers it intolerable that households and industries should pay for financial speculation in the price of energy and not only for climate pollution;
meni, da bi morale države članice uvesti fiskalne ukrepe za boj proti špekulacijam pri cenah goriv, zlasti z uvedbo davka na dobiček naftnih podjetij, ki izhaja iz „učinka zalog“, na ravni posamezne države članice;
Believes that the Member States should introduce fiscal measures to combat speculation in fuel prices, notably by creating, at individual Member-State level, a tax on oil companies’ profits arising from the ‘stock effect’;
poudarja, da tekoči proces liberalizacije trgov in privatizacije javnih služb, med drugim v energetskem sektorju, ni obrodil vidnih sadov, kar zadeva cene, kakovost storitev ali zmanjšanje javne porabe; nasprotno ugotavlja, da potrošniške organizacije in organizacije uporabnikov javnih storitev poročajo o povišanju cen, znižanju kakovosti storitev in povečanju stroškov oskrbe; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je liberalizacija prispevala k zmanjšanju števila delovnih mest in k ustvarjanju zasebnih monopolov, ki ogrožajo pravice delavcev, uporabnikov javnih storitev in potrošnikov;
Stresses that the ongoing process of liberalising markets and privatising public utilities such as the energy sector has not brought any visible gains in terms of prices, service quality or a reduction in public expenditure; notes on the contrary that consumers’ and public service users’ associations have reported price increases, a drop in the level of service quality and increases in the costs of provision; notes, furthermore, that liberalisation has contributed to the destruction of jobs and the creation of private monopolies that put the rights of workers, public service users and consumers at risk;
zato zavrača liberalizacijo energetskega sektorja in poudarja pomen javnih storitev za spodbujanje družbene, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije v EU; poudarja, da javni strukturni sektorji, kot je energetski, ne bi smeli biti izpostavljeni konkurenci, temveč bi morali biti v lasti in upravljanju javnih organov, saj je to edini način za zagotavljanje kakovosti, razpoložljivosti in dostopnosti storitve ter s tem pravic uporabnikov;
Rejects, therefore, the liberalisation of the energy sector and highlights the importance of public services for the promotion of social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU; stresses that public structural sectors, like energy, should not be open to competition but rather should be owned and managed by public authorities, as the only way to ensure the quality, availability and affordability of the service provided and so guarantee the users’ rights;
poudarja, da mora biti ekološka in družbena trajnost osrednja točka v programih javnih naložb EU in držav članic; meni, da bi bilo treba več pozornosti nameniti razvoju ukrepov za energetsko učinkovitost, uporabo obnovljivih virov energije in spodbujanje tehnologij soproizvodnje; poziva k oblikovanju programa Skupnosti, ki bo podprl ukrepe za večjo energetsko učinkovitost in s tem manjšo porabo energije v državah članicah;
Stresses that ecological and social sustainability must be at the heart of the EU’s and the Member States’ public investment programmes; considers that more emphasis should be put on developing energy-efficiency measures, the use of renewable energy sources and the promotion of co-generation technologies; calls for a Community programme to support measures to improve energy efficiency in the Member States and thus reduce energy consumption;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in državam članicam.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission and the placePlaceNameMemberPlaceType States.
k izjavi Sveta in Komisije
further to Questions for Oral Answer B6‑0460/2008 and B6-0461/2008
ki ga predlagata Hannes Swoboda in Robert Goebbels
by Hannes Swoboda and Robert Goebbels
o rastočih cenah energije
on rising energy prices
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o rastočih cenah energije
European Parliament resolution on rising energy prices
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije Evropskemu svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu z naslovom Energetska politika za Evropo (KOM(2007)0001),
having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament entitled ‘An Energy Policy for placeEurope’ (COM(2007)0001),
ob upoštevanju sklepov predsedstva Evropskega sveta z zasedanja 8. in 9. marca 2007 in akcijskega načrta Evropskega sveta (2007–2009) za energetsko politiko za Evropo,
having regard to the Presidency Conclusions of the European Council of 8-9 March 2007 and the European Council’s Action Plan (2007-2009) for an Energy Policy for Europe (EPE),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 26. septembra 2007 z naslovom: "Naproti skupni zunanji politiki na področju energetike",
having regard to its resolution of 26 September 2007 entitled ‘towards a common European foreign policy on energy’ of 26 September 2007,
ob upoštevanju člena 103(2) svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 108(5) of its Rules of Procedure,
ker se je cena nafte v zadnjih treh letih potrojila in ker je delež nafte v porabi energije EU 37 %, kar je uničujoče vplivalo na gospodarstva in gospodinjstva EU,
whereas over the last three years oil prices have more than tripled and, with a 37% share of EU energy consumption coming from oil, this has had a devastating impact on EU economies and households,
ker je rast cen energije med glavnimi razlogi za to, da je obrestna mera Evropske centralne banke od junija 2007 ostala 4-odstotna in v bližnji prihodnosti ne gre pričakovati, da bi se spremenila,
whereas energy price inflation is one of the main reasons the ECB has left its main interest rate unchanged at 4% since June 2007 and is not expected to announce any change in the near future,
ker na ceno nafte vpliva več dejavnikov, vključno s: pomanjkanjem naložb v zmogljivosti raziskovanja in rafiniranja; precejšnjim povečanjem povpraševanja po nafti v zadnjih letih in porastom svetovnega povpraševanja po energiji za več kot 50 % do leta 2030 (po ocenah Mednarodne agencije za energijo) ter strmim naraščanjem porabe energije v razvijajočih se gospodarstvih; politično nestabilnostjo na Bližnjem vzhodu; izčrpavanjem naftnih rezerv; vremenskimi dogodki in špekulacijami s cenami,
whereas the price of oil is affected by several factors, including: lack of investment in exploration and refining capacity; the considerable increase in demand for oil in recent years, with global energy demand growing – according to IEA estimates – by more than 50% by 2030 and the rapid increase in energy consumption by emerging economies; political instability in the Middle East; depletion of oil reserves; weather incidents; and price speculation,
ker je potreba po energiji osnovna človekova potreba, kljub temu pa vedno več državljanov EU ne zmore poravnavati računov za energijo, in ker so najbolj prizadeti ranljivi odjemalci, vključno s starejšimi, invalidi in družinami z nizkimi dohodki,
whereas energy is a basic human need, and yet a growing number of EU citizens are unable to afford their energy bills, and whereas vulnerable customers, including the elderly and disabled and low income families, are those most affected,
ker bi skupna evropska zunanja energetska politika, temelječa na solidarnosti in raznovrstnosti ter spodbujanju trajnosti, ustvarila sinergije, ki bi zagotovile varnost oskrbe za Evropsko unijo, hkrati pa povečale moč, sposobnost ukrepanja na področju zunanje politike in verodostojnost EU kot svetovnega akterja,
whereas a common European foreign policy on energy, based on solidarity and diversification and on the promotion of sustainability, would create synergies ensuring security of supply for the European Union and would enhance the EU’s strength, capacity for action in foreign policy matters and credibility as a global actor,
poudarja, da je treba kratkoročno omiliti posledice za najranljivejše skupine, s socialnimi ukrepi, če je treba; poziva Komisijo, naj se zoperstavi tveganju povečanega socialnega izključevanja zaradi višjih cen nafte; potrjuje, da je treba pri odzivu na brezposelnost, izhajajočo iz podražitve nafte, uporabiti Evropski socialni sklad;
Stresses that the effects on the most vulnerable groups must be mitigated in the short term, where necessary through social measures; calls on the Commission to counter the risk of increased social exclusion resulting from higher oil prices; affirms the need to use the European Social Fund in addressing unemployment stemming from the rise in oil prices;
izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi socialnih posledic povečanih stroškov za stanovanje, ogrevanje in prevoz, zlasti za revne in ranljive skupine, ter poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo ustrezne ukrepe za zagotovitev cenovne dostopnosti teh storitev in dostopa do njih, vključno s ciljno usmerjeno dohodkovno podporo ter pobudami za izboljšanje energetske učinkovitosti gospodinjstev, da bi zagotovili mobilnost in preprečili socialno izključenost ter zniževanje življenjskega standarda; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja nedavni predlog predsednika evroskupine, naj države članice EU določijo nacionalne minimalne dohodke, da bi vse Evropejce dvignili nad prag revščine;
Expresses its concern over the social consequences of increased housing, heating and transport costs, in particular for low-income, poor and vulnerable groups, and urges Member States to adopt appropriate measures to ensure affordability and access to these services, including both targeted income support and incentives to improve household energy efficiency, in order to ensure mobility and avoid social exclusion and pauperisation; welcomes in this context the recent proposal by the President of the Eurogroup that EU Member States should establish national minimum incomes, to lift all Europeans above the poverty threshold;
meni, da bi morala Komisija predložiti sporočilo o reševanju težav zaradi pomanjkanja energije v Evropski uniji; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo nacionalne opredelitve pomanjkanja energije in razvijejo nacionalne akcijske načrte za njegovo odpravo; poziva Komisijo, naj nadzoruje in usklajuje podatke, ki jih zagotavljajo države članice, poleg tega pa zagotovi spoštovanje obveznosti univerzalne storitve in obveznosti javnih služb;
Considers that the Commission should bring forward a communication on tackling energy poverty in the European Union; calls on Member States to provide national definitions of energy poverty and to develop national action plans to eradicate energy poverty; calls on the Commission to monitor and coordinate the data provided by Member States, in addition to ensuring that universal and public service obligations are respected;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo predlagana listina o pravicah potrošnikov energije pravno zavezujoča in da bo jasno določala pravice potrošnikov; poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo nacionalni regulativni organi uporabljali pooblastila, ki so jim na voljo, za pomoč potrošnikom;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that the proposed Consumer Charter for Energy is legally binding and clearly sets out consumers’ rights; calls on the Member States to ensure that the national regulatory authorities use the powers at their disposal to help consumers;