natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
meni, da ponoven razpis za ustanovitev javno-zasebnega podjetja ni potreben, če je bil prvi razpis natančen in obširen;
Takes the view that, if the first invitation to tender for the establishment of a public-private undertaking has been precise and comprehensive, a further tendering procedure is unnecessary;
zahteva natančno opredelitev pojma "podoben nadzor", ki ga izvaja naročnik nad ponudnikom storitev, zlasti kadar javno-zasebna podjetja opravljajo storitve za račun in v okviru javnih naročil naročnika, ki jih ta financira ali zanje jamči;
Calls for a more precise definition of the concept of "similar control", which the organising public authority exercises over the service provider, particularly in cases where public-private undertakings provide, on behalf of the organising public authority and in connection with the performance of its tasks, services that are mainly funded or underwritten by the organising public authority;
Sodelovanje med javnimi organi
Cooperation between public authorities
pozdravlja v interesu lokalne samouprave in učinkovite uprave kot splošno načelo nekatere oblike sodelovanja na ravni lokalnih organov, ki bodo omogočile predvsem učinke sinergije, dokler to ne bo povzročilo zlorabe, ki bi vodila v zaprtje trga;
Welcomes as a general principle, in the interests of local self-government and efficient administration, some form of cooperation at local authority level, not least to bring about synergies, as long as this does not enable abuse leading to market closure;
meni, da mora Komisija pojasniti pravno negotovost na področju sodelovanja med javnimi organi, ki je nastala kot posledica sodne prakse Sodišča;
Considers it necessary that the Commission clarify the legal uncertainty regarding cooperation between public authorities which has arisen as a result of the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice;
, da sporazumi o sodelovanju med javnimi organi ne morejo biti v celoti izvzeti iz zakonodaje o javnih naročilih na podlagi uporabe pravne oblike v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo; meni, da je treba potegniti mejo med ukrepi, ki so čisto upravne in/ali organizacijske narave ter javnimi naročili med upravnimi organi;
that cooperation agreements between public authorities cannot be exempted from procurement law across the board by means of the use of a legal form under national law; takes the view that there is a need for demarcation between measures which are purely administrative and/or organisational in nature and procurement contracts between administrative authorities;
meni, da zakonodaja o javnih naročilih ne velja za primere sodelovanja med javnimi organi, če:
Considers that cases of cooperation between public authorities are not relevant with regard to procurement law if:
gre za sodelovanje med lokalnimi organi,
the cooperation is between local authorities,
če so naloge, prenesene na lokalne organe, povezane z reorganizacijo uprave ali če so pravice do nadzora zadevnih lokalnih organov podobne tistim, s katerimi razpolagajo nad lastnimi službami, in
the tasks, the performance of which was assigned to these local authorities, are to be considered a matter of administrative reorganisation or if the supervisory powers of the local authorities concerned are similar to those which they exercise with regard to their own departments, and
če se dejavnosti v glavnem opravljajo za zadevne lokalne organe;
the activities are essentially performed for the local authorities concerned;
zavrača uporabo zakonodaje o javnih naročilih v primerih, v katerih želijo javni organi na svojem ozemlju izpolniti naloge skupaj z drugimi javnimi organi kot ukrep upravne reorganizacije, ne da bi izvajanje zadevnih storitev ponudili tretji osebi na trgu;
Rejects the application of procurement law in cases where public authorities plan to carry out tasks within their territory in conjunction with other public authorities as a measure of administrative reorganisation, without offering the provision of the services concerned to third parties on the open market;
meni, da prenos pristojnosti v zvezi z opravljanjem nalog javnega sektorja z enega javnega organa na drugega ne spada v področje uporabe zakonodaje Skupnosti o javnih naročilih;
Considers that the transfer of responsibilities for public sector tasks from one public authority to another does not come within the scope of Community procurement law;
vseeno meni, da je treba zakonodajo o javnih naročilih uporabiti vedno, kadar javni organi ponujajo storitve na trgu kot privatna podjetja v okviru sodelovanja med takšnimi javnimi organi, ali se dogovorijo, da javne naloge opravijo zasebniki ali drugi javni organi, izven obsega tega sodelovanja;
Considers, however, that procurement law always needs to be applied when public authorities offer services on the market as private undertakings in the context of cooperation between such public authorities or arrange for public tasks to be carried out by private undertakings or other public authorities outside the scope of this cooperation;
naroča svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in Komisiji, Evropskemu ekonomsko-socialnemu odboru ter Odboru regij.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o uporabi Direktive 96/71/ES o napotitvi delavcev ( 2006/2038(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the application of Directive 96/71/EC on the posting of workers ( 2006/2038(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Direktive 96/71/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. decembra 1996 o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev UL L 18, 21.1.1997, str.
having regard to Directive 96/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1996 concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services OJ L 18, 21.1.1997, p.
(Direktiva o napotitvi delavcev),
(the Posting of Workers Directive),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije o izvajanju Direktive 96/71/ES v državah članicah ( KOM(2003)0458 ),
having regard to the Commission communication on the implementation of Directive 96/71/EC in the Member States ( COM(2003)0458 ),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z naslovom "Smernice o napotitvi delavcev na delo v okviru opravljanja storitev" ( KOM(2006)0159 ) (Smernice),
having regard to the Commission communication entitled, Guidance on the posting of workers within the framework of the provision of services ( COM(2006)0159 ) (Guidance),
ob upoštevanju poročila služb Komisije o izvajanju Direktive 96/71/ES ( SEK(2006)0439 ) (poročilo služb Komisije),
having regard to the Commission's services report on the implementation of Directive 96/71/EC ( SEC(2006)0439 ) (Services Report),
ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 15. januarja 2004 o izvajanju Direktive 96/71/ES v državah članicah UL C 92 E, 16.4.2004, str.
having regard to its resolution of 15 January 2004 on the implementation of Directive 96/71/EC in the Member States OJ C 92 E, 16.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju členov 27 in 34 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
having regard to Articles 27 and 34 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2005/214/PNZ z dne 24. februarja 2005 o uporabi načela vzajemnega priznavanja denarnih kazni UL L 76, 22.3.2005, str.
having regard to Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties OJ L 76, 22.3.2005, p.
ob upoštevanju sodb Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti z dne 9. avgusta 1994 v zadevi C-43/93
having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Communities of 9 August 1994 in Case C-43/93,
, z dne 23. novembra 1999 v združenih zadevah C-369/96 in 376/96,
, of 23 November 1999 Joined cases C-369/96 and 376/96,
, z dne 25. oktobra 2001 v združenih zadevah C-49/98, C-50/98, C-52/98, C-54/98, C-68/98 in C-71/98,
, of 25 October 2001 in Joined cases C-49/98, C-50/98, C-52/98, C-54/98, C-68/98 and C-71/98,
, z dne 7. februarja 2002 v zadevi C-279/00,
, of 7 February 2002 in Case C-279/00,
, z dne 12. oktobra 2004 v zadevi C-60/03, W
, of 12 October 2004 in Case-C-60/03,
olff & Müller GmbH
Wolff & Müller GmbH
, z dne 21. oktobra 2004 v zadevi C-445/03,
, of 21 October 2004 in Case C-445/03,
ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 91/533/EGS z dne 14. oktobra 1991 o obveznosti delodajalca, da zaposlene obvesti o pogojih, ki se nanašajo na pogodbo o zaposlitvi ali delovno razmerje UL L 288, 18.10.1991, str.
having regard to Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform the employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship OJ L 288, 18.10.1991, p.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za zaposlovanje in socialne zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za notranji trg in varstvo potrošnikov ( A6-0308/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection ( A6-0308/2006 ),
ker ima Direktiva o napotitvi delavcev dva pomembna cilja, in sicer zagotavljanje prostega pretoka oseb in storitev ob zagotavljanju, da veljajo v zvezi z minimalnimi plačami, pogoji dela, zdravjem in varstvom za napotene delavce določila in pogoji države članice gostiteljice, v skladu s členom 3 Direktive o napotitvi delavcev; ker je to pomembno orodje za zagotavljanje pravične obravnave,
whereas the Posting of Workers Directive has two important objectives, which are to guarantee the free movement of persons and services whilst ensuring that posted employees are subject to the terms and conditions related to minimum rates of pay, working conditions and health and safety of the host Member State, pursuant to Article 3 of the Posting of Workers Directive; whereas this is an important tool for ensuring fair treatment,
ker bi morala merila in pogoji, navedeni v členu 3 Direktive o napotitvi delavcev, veljati le kot minimalni standardi; ker člen 3(7) Direktive o napotitvi delavcev navaja, da pogoji iz člena 3(1) do (6) ne onemogočajo uporabe ne onemogočajo uporabe za delavce ugodnejših meril in pogojev zaposlitve,
whereas the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of the Posting of Workers Directive should be regarded as minimum standards only; whereas Article 3(7) of the Posting of Workers Directive provides that the conditions set out in paragraphs 1 to 6 of Article 3 do not prevent the application of terms and conditions of employment which are more favourable to workers,
ker mora država gostiteljica v skladu s členom 2(2) Direktive o napotitvi delavcev določiti opredelitev delavca; ker zgoraj navedeno poročilo služb Komisije potrjuje, da so pri tem odločilne dejanske razmere dela v državi gostiteljici,
whereas under Article 2(2) of the Posting of Workers Directive, it is incumbent on the host country to define what constitutes a worker; whereas the above-mentioned Commission's Services Report confirms that the de facto labour situation in the host country is the decisive criterion in this connection,
ker je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti v zadevi
whereas in the
razsodilo, da se ukrepi države gostiteljice za preprečevanje nelojalne konkurence, ki zagotavljajo, da se delavcem, napotenim na njeno ozemlje, zagotovijo minimalni standardi, določeni v členu 3 Direktive o napotitvi delavcev, štejejo za upravičene ter da so taki zaščitni ukrepi upravičeni kot omejitev svobode izvajanja storitev,
case, the Court of Justice held that the host country's measures to prevent unfair competition, which guarantee that posted employees benefit from the minimum standards set out in Article 3 of the Posting of Workers Directive, are justified, and that such targeted protection measures constitute a justified restriction on the freedom to provide services,
ker je v zadevi
whereas in
Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti razsodilo, da si svoboda izvajanja storitev in ohranjanje lojalne konkurence na eni strani ter na drugi zagotavljanje varstva delavcev niso nujno v nasprotju,
the Court of Justice held that there is not necessarily a contradiction between the freedom to provide services and the upholding of fair competition on the one hand and ensuring workers' protection on the other,
ker načelo enakega obravnavanja Direktive o napotitvi delavcev deluje na dva načina, po eni strani zagotavlja enako obravnavanje podjetij v okviru svobode izvajanja storitev, po drugi strani pa v skladu s členom 3 enako obravnavanje napotenih zaposlenih v zvezi z minimalnimi predpisi o določbah in pogojih zaposlitve,
whereas the equal treatment principle in the Posting of Workers Directive cuts both ways, guaranteeing, on the one hand, the equal treatment of undertakings in the context of the freedom to provide services, and, on the other, under Article 3, the equal treatment of posted employees under the locally applicable minimum terms and conditions of employment,
ker Komisija v Smernicah zahteva ukrepe, ki bi preprečili, da bi se izognili minimalnim varnostnim predpisom in pravicam do varstva v škodo napotenim delavcem,
whereas the Commission's Guidance calls for measures to prevent the minimum protection standards and rights from being circumvented to the disadvantage of the posted workers,
ob upoštevanju, da je Komisija prejela zelo malo pritožb v zvezi z izvajanjem Direktive o napotitvi delavcev in glede na omejeno število postopkov za ugotavljanje kršitev, ki jih je sprožila Komisija, je očitno, da se ljudje ne zavedajo svojih pravic v okviru te direktive in zato ne dosega svojega cilja,
whereas the very small number of complaints received by the Commission relating to the implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive and the limited number of infringement procedures brought by the Commission highlight the fact that people are unaware of their rights under the directive and that it is therefore failing to achieve its aims,
ker so stranke kolektivne pogodbe o plačah lahko bistvene za uspešno izvajanje Direktive o napotitvi delavcev in bi zato krepitev vloge socialnih partnerjev ter boljše čezmejno sodelovanje bistveno prispevala k doseganju želenega načela enakosti; ker pa v številnih državah večina delavcev niso člani sindikatov in ravno ti delavci pogosto dobijo najmanj informacij glede svojih pravic in obveznosti,
whereas the parties to collective wage agreements may have a major role to play in the successful implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive, and whereas boosting the role of the social partners and greater cross-border cooperation would accordingly represent a decisive step towards achieving the desired equality; whereas, however, in many countries the majority of workers are not members of trade unions and it is often this group of non-affiliated workers that receives the least information about its rights and obligations,
ker bi bilo primerno, da imajo v tistih državah članicah, v katerih se ta direktiva izvaja prek kolektivnih pogodb, socialni partnerji neposreden dostop do informacij v zvezi s podjetji, ki napotijo delavce, zato da lahko izvajajo nadzor, ki ga v drugih državah članicah opravljajo organi oblasti, ki imajo dostop do informacij podjetja,
whereas it would be appropriate for the social partners in those Member States where the directive is implemented through collective agreements to gain direct access to information about the posting companies so that they can exercise the supervision which in other Member States is subject to authorities that have such access to company information,
ker je v primerih, v katerih dvostranske in tristranske pogodbe med državami članicami in strankami kolektivne pogodbe priznavajo zadevne nacionalne predpise v zvezi z varnostjo pri delu in pogoje zaposlitve, mogoče uspešno preprečevati neupoštevanje nacionalnih standardov in s tem izboljšati tudi sodelovanje uradov za zvezo ali izmenjavo informacij med sindikati,
whereas, in cases where bilateral or trilateral agreements between or among Member States, and between or among the parties to collective agreements, accord mutual recognition to national industrial safety standards and working conditions, the circumvention of national standards has successfully been prevented, and whereas this situation has also been improved thanks to cooperation between liaison offices and the exchange of information between trade unions,
ker je Direktiva o napotitvi delavcev še vedno nujna za zagotavljanje pravne varnosti napotenim delavcem in zadevnim podjetjem in ker mora biti Komisija dejavnejša pri spodbujanju učinkovitejšega sodelovanja med državami članicami, njihovimi uradi za zvezo in inšpektorati za delo, zlasti zaradi preprečevanja nelojalne konkurence in socialnega dampinga,
whereas the Posted Workers Directive is still needed to provide legal certainty for posted workers and the businesses concerned, and whereas the Commission needs to take an active position to make cooperation between the Member States, their liaison offices and employment inspectorates more effective and efficient, particularly to counteract unfair competition and social dumping,
ker so se države članice EU-15 v preferenčni klavzuli pristopne pogodbe obvezale k temu, da priseljencev iz desetih novih držav članic glede prostega pretoka ne bodo obravnavale slabše kot priseljence iz tretjih držav; ker je to mogoče le, če je pristojnim organom znano prebivališče priseljencev iz tretjih držav; ker država gostiteljica ne sme postavljati dodatnih pogojev za napotene delavce iz tretjih držav, če so jih zakonito zaposlili ponudniki storitev z registrirano dejavnostjo v državi članici,
whereas the EU-15 Member States undertook, in a preferential clause in the Accession Treaty, not to treat the nationals of the ten new Member States less favourably, as regards free movement, than third-country nationals; whereas this is only possible if the residence of the third-country nationals is known to the relevant authorities; whereas host Member States may not impose additional conditions on posted workers from third countries if they have been lawfully employed by a service provider established in a Member State,
ugotavlja, da Komisija v Smernicah priznava socialni cilj Direktive o napotitvi delavcev in izključno odgovornost države gostiteljice za izvajanje tega cilja, tako da vsem zaposlenim, začasno napotenih na delo v tujino, zagotovi varstvo in pravice; ugotavlja, da Komisija poziva države članice, naj prevzamejo odgovornost ter hkrati zagotovijo pravico podjetij iz člena 49 Pogodbe ES, da zagotavljajo čezmejne storitve;
Notes that the Commission, in its Guidance, recognises both the social objective of the Posting of Workers Directive and the full responsibility of the host country to put that objective into practice by guaranteeing the protection and rights of all employees temporarily posted abroad; notes that the Commission calls on Member States to assume this responsibility while guaranteeing the company rights under Article 49 of the EC Treaty to provide cross-border services;
poudarja, da so za težave pri uporabi Direktive o napotitvi delavcev delno krive države članice, ker je niso vse prenesle v svojo zakonodajo, in zato v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, da obvešča Parlament o napredku postopkov proti državam članicam za ugotavljanje kršitev; razen tega želi opozoriti na težave pri izvajanju Direktive o napotitvi delavcev, ki so jih povzročile razlike v razlagi nekaterih ključnih konceptov, kot so delavec, minimalna plača in podizvajalci, na težave delavcev in malih podjetij pri pridobivanju informacij ter težave pri nadzorovanju skladnosti s to direktivo;
Points out that the difficulties raised by the application of the Posting of Workers Directive are related partly to the fact that it has not been transposed by all the Member States, and calls on the Commission to keep Parliament informed of the progress of infringement proceedings against defaulting Member States; and also draws attention to the difficulties of implementing the Posting of Workers Directive as a result of differences of interpretation of certain key concepts, such as worker, minimum salary, and subcontracting, the difficulty of both workers and small businesses in obtaining information, and the difficulty of monitoring compliance with the directive;
ugotavlja, da si Komisija v Smernicah prizadeva za boljše izvajanje Direktive o napotitvi delavcev, zato da se zmanjšajo obstoječe ovire v državah članicah, ki resno ovirajo učinkovite napotitve delavcev; vseeno ugotavlja, da Komisija v pravnih razlagah v nekaterih primerih presega sodno prakso Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti; ugotavlja, da Komisija v sklepnih ugotovitvah svojih Smernic priznava, da je treba jasneje opredeliti nadzorne ukrepe in izboljšati dostop do informacij; vendar pričakuje sprejetje ustreznih ukrepov obvezujočega značaja za krepitev direktive;
Notes that the Commission's Guidance strives towards the better implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive with the aim of reducing the existing barriers in the Members States, which severely obstruct the effective posting of workers; notes however, that the Commission's legal interpretation in some cases goes beyond that established by the case law of Court of Justice; notes that the Commission, in the conclusions of its Guidance, recognises the need for inspection measures to be more clearly defined and access to information to be improved; expects appropriate mandatory remedies for the enforcement of the directive to be adopted, however;
poziva Komisijo, naj predloži predlog direktive o zahtevanih pogojih za posadke plovil, ki redno izvajajo potniške ali tovorne trajektne storitve med državami članicami;
Calls on the Commission to submit a proposal for a directive on the conditions required for the crews of vessels providing regular passenger and freight ferry services between Member States;
ugotavlja, da je ena od ključnih težav uspešnega izvajanja Direktive o napotitvi delavcev vprašanje dvojne napotitve, ki se lahko prepreči z zagotavljanjem boljše koordinacije med državami članicami ter okrepljenim postopkom obveščanja;
Notes that one of the key practical difficulties in the successful implementation of the Posting of Workers Directive is the issue of double posting and that better coordination between Member States and enhanced notification procedures are required to counter this;
opozarja na pripombo Komisije iz Smernic, da se Direktiva o napotitvi delavcev v nekaterih državah članicah v praksi ne izvaja, in poziva Komisijo, da v zvezi s tem sprejme ustrezne ukrepe;
Notes the observation in the Commission's Guidance that the Posting of Workers Directive is not enforced in practice in some Member States, and calls on the Commission to take appropriate measures in this connection;
Delovna razmerja in opredelitev izraza "delavec"
Employment relationships and the definition of "employee"
podpira analizo v Smernicah Komisije, da v okviru Direktive o napotitvi delavcev ni primerno obravnavati vprašanj v zvezi s pravnim položajem samozaposlenih delavcev; glede na poročila iz dejanske prakse ugotavlja, da je "navidezna samozaposlitev" najpogosteje uporabljena strategija za izogibanje minimalnim standardom iz člena 3(1) Direktive o napotitvi delavcev;
Supports the analysis in the Commission's Guidance that the Posting of Workers Directive is not the appropriate context within which to address concerns with regard to the legal situation of self-employed workers; concludes from reports based on actual practice that sham self-employment is a strategy commonly used to circumvent the minimum standards of Article 3(1) of the Posting of Workers Directive;