natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
PE455.856/rev./v02-00 B7‑0029/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o mednarodnih posvojitvah v Evropski uniji
PE455.856/rev./v02-00 B7‑0029/2011 European Parliament resolution on international adoption in the European Union
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah, ki jo je generalna skupščina Združenih narodov sprejela 20. novembra 1989, zlasti njenega člena 21,
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted by the UN General Assembly on 20 November 1989, in particular Article 21,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o varstvu otrok in sodelovanju pri meddržavnih posvojitvah, podpisane v Haagu leta 1993, in Evropske konvencije o uresničevanju otrokovih pravic z dne 25. januarja 1996 (ETS št. 160),
– having regard to the Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption (signed at The Hague in 1993) and to the European Convention 25 January 1996 on the Exercise of Children's Rights (ETS No 160),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o izboljšanju zakonodaje in sodelovanja med državami pri posvojitvah otrok ( A4-0392/1996 ),
– having regard to the European Parliament Resolution on improving legislation and cooperation among member states on adoption of children ( A4-0392/1996 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU na področju otrokovih pravic z dne 16. januarja 2008 (2007/2093 (INI)),
– having regard to the European Parliament Resolution 16 January 2008 on an EU strategy on children's rights (2007/2093 (INI)),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja Komisiji z dne 16. decembra 2010 o mednarodnih posvojitvah v Evropski uniji ( O-0193/2010 – B7 0670/2010),
– having regard to the question of 16 December 2010 to the Commission on international adoption in the European Union ( O-0193/2010 – B7 0670/2010),
A. ker se mnenja med državami članicami o načelih, ki naj bi urejala posvojitve otrok, postopke posvojitve in pravne posledice posvojitev, razlikujejo,
A. whereas the views differ throughout the Member States as to the principles which should govern child adoption, the adoption procedures and the legal consequences of adoption,
B. ker bi sprejetje skupnih revidiranih načel in praks v zvezi s posvojitvijo otrok pripomoglo k zmanjševanju težav, ki jih povzročajo razlike v nacionalnih zakonodajah in hkrati podprlo interese posvojenih otrok,
B. whereas the acceptance of common revised principles and practices with respect to the adoption of children would help to reduce the difficulties caused by the differences in national legislations and at the same time promote the interests of children who are adopted,
C. ker postaja vprašanje zapuščenih otrok v Evropi vse resnejše in nujno in je za reševanje teh nujnih razmer pomembno, da se zaščiti pravica otrok do posvojitve tudi na mednarodni ravni, ter tako prepreči, da bi otroci morali živeti v sirotišnicah,
C. whereas in Europe the problem of abandoned children is becoming more serious and urgent and to meet this emergency it is important to protect the right of a child to be adopted also at international level to prevent children from being forced to live in orphanages,
D. ker obstajajo veljavne konvencije o varstvu otrok in starševskih odgovornostih, zlasti evropska konvencija o posvojitvah mladoletnih oseb iz leta 1967, katere namen je približati pravo držav članic v primerih, kjer se zaradi posvojitve otrok preseli iz ene države v drugo, in konvencija o varstvu otrok in sodelovanju pri meddržavnih posvojitvah iz leta 1993;
D. whereas there are conventions in force on child protection and parental responsibilities, notably: the European Convention of 1967 on the adoption of minors, aiming to approach the laws of Member States where adoption involves moving the child from one country to another, and the 1993 Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Inter-Country Adoption,
E. ker je z začetkom veljave Lizbonske pogodbe Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah postala zavezujoča in imajo v skladu z njenim členom 24 otroci pravico do potrebnega varstva in skrbi za zagotovitev njihove dobrobiti.
E. whereas, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights has become binding: according to Article 24, 'Children shall have the right to such protection and care as is necessary for their well-being'.
Poleg tega člen 3 Lizbonske pogodbe določa, da je varstvo otrokovih pravic eden od ciljev Unije,
Furthermore, Article 3 of the Lisbon Treaty states that the 'protection of the rights of the child' falls within the objectives of the Union,
F. ker v EU kršitve otrokovih pravic, nasilje nad otroci, trgovina z njimi za namene nezakonite posvojite, prostitucije, nezakonitega dela, prisilne poroke, prosjačenja na ulici ali kateri koli drug nezakonit namen ostajajo težava,
F. whereas the violation of the rights of children, violence against them and child trafficking for illegal adoption, prostitution, illegal labour, forced marriage, and begging on the streets or for any other illegal purpose, remain a problem in the EU,
G. ker so otrokove koristi najpomembnejše,
G. whereas the best interests of the children are of paramount importance,
4. poziva države članice in Komisijo, naj v sodelovanju s Haaško konferenco, Svetom Evrope in organizacijami, ki skrbijo za otroke, razvijejo okvir za zagotavljanje preglednosti in učinkovitega spremljanja razvoja zapuščenih in posvojenih otrok, ter naj svoje ukrepe usklajujejo, da bi preprečevale trgovino z otroki;
Urges Member States and the Commission, in cooperation with the Hague Conference, the Council of Europe, and children’s organisations to develop a framework to ensure transparency and effective monitoring of the development of the abandoned and the adopted children and to coordinate their actions so as to prevent child trafficking;
12.1.2011 B7-0030/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0670/2010
12.1.2011 B7-0030/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0670/2010
o zapuščenih otrocih in mednarodni posvojitvi v EU
on abandoned children and international adoption in the EU
PE455.857v01-00 B7‑0030/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o zapuščenih otrocih in mednarodni posvojitvi v EU
PE455.857 B7‑0030/2011 European Parliament resolution on Abandoned Children and International Adoption in the EU
– ob upoštevanju Haaške konvencije iz leta 1993 o varstvu otrok in sodelovanju pri meddržavnih posvojitvah,
– having regard to the 1993 Hague Convention on Protection of Children and Respect of Inter-Country Adoptions,
– ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o posvojitvi otrok iz leta 1967,
– having regard for the 1967 European Convention on the Adoption of Children,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah,
– having regard for the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child,
– ob upoštevanju stališča Unicefa o meddržavnih posvojitvah iz januarja 2004,
– having regard for the UNICEF position on inter-country adoption of January 2004,
– ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije 1996 o uresničevanju otrokovih pravic, ki jo je leta 1996 sprejel Svet Evrope,
– having regard for the 1996 Council of Europe’s European Convention on the Exercise of Children’s Rights,
– ob upoštevanju nacionalnega prava v 27 državah članicah Evropske unije, ki ureja področje družine in posvojitev;
– having regard for national law regarding the family and adoption in the European Union’s 27 Member States,
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o izboljšanju zakonodaje in sodelovanja med državami pri posvojitvah otrok ( A4-0392/96 ),
– having regard to the European Parliament Resolution on improving legislation and cooperation among member states on adoption of children ( A4–0392/96 ),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o strategiji EU na področju otrokovih pravic z dne 16. januarja 2008 (2007/2093 (INI)),
– having regard to the European Parliament Resolution 16 January 2008 on an EU strategy on children’s rights (2007/2093 (INI)),
A. ker do mednarodne posvojitve pride, kadar posvojitelji živijo v drugi državi in se otrok preseli tja,
A. whereas international adoption takes place when the adoptive parents live in another country and the child is moved to the country,
B. ker se število mednarodnih posvojitev v svetovnem merilu vsako leto skoraj podvoji, pri čemer gre v veliki večini primerov za otroke, ki iz držav v razvoju pridejo v razvite države,
B. whereas the number of international adoptions, globally, has nearly doubled each year with the vast majority of international adoptions currently involve children moving from developing to developed countries,
C. ker je glavni instrument mednarodnega prava za urejanje mednarodnih posvojitev Haaška konvencija o posvojitvah iz leta 1993, pri čemer je 81 držav pogodbenic te konvencije,
C. whereas the primary instrument in international law which aims to regulate international adoption is the 1993 Hague Convention on Adoption of which 81 countries are parties to the Convention,
D. ker se v državah, kjer praksa mednarodnih posvojitev ni regulirana, tveganje za trgovino z otroki in ugrabitve bistveno poveča,
D. whereas that in those countries where the practice of international adoption is not regulated, the risks of child trafficking and abduction increase significantly,
E. ker je dobrobit zapuščenih otrok osrednja vrednota Evropske unije,
E. whereas the welfare of abandoned children is a core value of the European Union,
F. ker mednarodna posvojitev v EU pomeni zelo zapleten pravni postopek, ki ga v posamezni državi članici ureja njeno nacionalno pravo o posvojitvah,
F. whereas international adoption is within the EU is a highly complex legal process governed by each Member State’s national law on adoption,
G. ker Listina temeljnih svoboščin Evropske unije obravnava vprašanje o pravicah otrok in določa, da je pri vseh ukrepih v zvezi z otroci treba najprej upoštevati, ali so v njihovem najboljšem interesu,
G. whereas the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union addresses the issue on the rights of children and states that ‘the best interest of the child must be the primary consideration on all actions relating to children’,
2. izjavlja, da mednarodne posvojitve ustvarjajo tveganje zlorab in malomarnega ravnanja, ki ogrožajo koristi otroka, ter da je lahko ločitev od bioloških staršev in prvotnega okolja stresna za otroka;
States that international adoption does create a risk of abuse and malpractice that undermine the best interests of the child and that separation from birth parents and place of origin can be distressful for a child;
5. poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo, da bodo brez izjeme vse odločitve o posvojitvi otroka sprejete v najboljšem interesu otroka;
Calls on Member States to ensure that all decisions relating to the adoption of a child are made exclusively in the best interests of the child;
7. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje predsedniku Evropskega sveta, Svetu, Komisiji ter parlamentom in vladam držav članic.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the President of the European Council, the Council, the Commission and the parliaments and governments of the Member States.
12.1.2011 B7-0031/2011 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanjem za ustni odgovor B7‑0669/2010 in B7‑0803/2010 , B7‑0804/2010 ter O-0216/2010
12.1.2011 B7-0031/2011 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Questions for Oral Answer B7‑0669/2010 , B7-0803/2010 , B7-0804/2010 and O-0216/2010
– ob upoštevanju mednarodnih instrumentov, ki zagotavljajo človekove pravice in temeljne svoboščine in prepovedujejo diskriminacijo, zlasti Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to international instruments guaranteeing human rights and fundamental freedoms and prohibiting discrimination, notably the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR),
– ob upoštevanju členov 6 in 7 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in člena 19 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki EU in njene države članice zavezujejo k spoštovanju človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin in zagotavljajo evropska sredstva za boj proti diskriminaciji in kršenju človekovih pravic,
– having regard to Articles 6 and 7 of the Treaty on European Union and Article 19 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which commit the EU and its Member States to upholding human rights and fundamental freedoms and provide European means to fight discrimination and human rights violations,
– ob upoštevanju Listine temeljnih pravic Evropske unije, zlasti člena 11, ki zagotavlja pravico do svobode izražanja, ter člena 21, ki prepoveduje diskriminacijo na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, especially Article 11 thereof, which guarantees the right to freedom of expression, and Article 21 thereof, which prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation,
– ob upoštevanju osnutka mnenja Ministrstva za pravosodje Republike Litve (št. 11-30-01),
– having regard to the draft opinion of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania (No 11-30-01),
– ob upoštevanju dejavnosti Evropske unije za boj proti diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in homofobije;
– having regard to European Union activities to fight discrimination based on sexual orientation and homophobia,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Agencije za temeljne pravice iz novembra 2010 z naslovom Homofobija, transfobija in diskriminacija na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in spolne identitete,
– having regard to the November 2010 Fundamental Rights Agency report ‘ Homophobia, transphobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity ’,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 17. septembra 2009 o razmerah v Litvi po sprejetju zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov P7_TA(2009)0019
– having regard to its Resolution of 17 September 2009 on the Situation in Lithuania following the adoption of the law on protection of minors P7_TA(2009)0019
– ob upoštevanju svojih prejšnjih resolucij o homofobiji, zaščiti manjšin in protdiskriminacijskih politikah, zlasti tistih o homofobiji v Evropi P6_TA(2006)0018 , P6_TA(2006)0273 , P6_TA(2007)0167
– having regard to its previous resolutions on homophobia, protection of minorities and anti‑discrimination policies, and notably to those on homophobia in Europe P6_TA(2006)0018 , P6_TA(2006)0273 , P6_TA(2007)0167
A. ker je seimas 16. decembra 2010 odložil glasovanje o zakonodajnem predlogu za spremembo zakona o upravnih prekrških, na podlagi katerega bi se javna promocija homoseksualnih odnosov kaznovala z denarno kaznijo od 2.000 do 10.000 LTL (580–2.900EUR),
A. whereas on 16 December 2010, the Seimas postponed a vote on draft legislation that would amend the Code of Administrative Offences to punish the ‘ public promotion of homosexual relations ’ with a fine of between LTL 2 000 and 10 000 (€580–2 900) ,
B . ker je odbor za šolstvo, znanost in kulturo seimasa 8. decembra 2010 spolno usmerjenost umaknil s seznama razlogov za zaščito v določbah o enakih možnosti zakona o izobraževanju (člen 5(1)),
B. whereas on 8 December 2010 the Committee on Education, Science and Culture of the Seimas also deleted sexual orientation from the list of grounds deserving protection in the equal opportuniti es provisions of the Law on Education (Article 5(1)),
C. ker so predlogi spremembe zakona o upravnih prekrških v nasprotju s členom 25 ustave Republike Litve, ki določa, da se oseb ne sme ovirati pri iskanju, prejemanju in dajanju informacij in idej, ter s členom 29, v katerem je zapisano, da so vsi ljudje enaki pred zakonom, sodiščem ter drugimi državnimi institucijami in uradniki.
C. whereas the draft amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences are contrary to Article 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, which stipulates that ‘the human being must not be hindered from seeking, receiving and imparting information and ideas’, and Article 29, which states ‘all persons shall be equal before the law, the court, and other State institutions and officials.
Človekovih pravic se ne sme omejevati, prav tako pa se ne sme podeljevati privilegijev na podlagi spola, rase, državljanstva, jezika, izvora, družbenega položaja, vere, prepričanja ali mnenja,
The rights of the human being may not be restricted, nor may he be granted any privileges on the ground of gender, race, nationality, language, origin, social status, belief, convictions or views’,
D. ker je minister za pravosodje Republike Litve izrazil mnenje, da so predlogi spremembe zakona o upravnih prekrških v nasprotju z zavezami Litve v okviru njene ustave, Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah,
D. whereas the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania has expressed the opinion that the draft amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences contravene Lithuania’s obligations under its Constitution, the European Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
E. ker zadnje poročilo Agencije za temeljne pravice iz novembra 2010 o homofobiji, transfobiji in diskriminaciji na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti in spolne identitete vsebuje sklep, da bi spremembe lahko potencialno kriminalizirale skoraj vsak javen izraz, prikaz ali informacijo o homoseksualnosti,
E. whereas the latest report from the Fundamental Rights Agency on ‘ Homophobia, transphobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity’ of November 2010 concludes that ‘ The amendments could potentially criminalise almost any public expression or portrayal of, or information about, homosexuality’,
F. ker se je junija 2009 seimas z veliko večino odločil za spremembo zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja ter s tem mladoletnikom prepovedal dostop do informacij o homoseksualnosti,
F. whereas in June 2009 the Seimas overwhelmingly voted to amend the ‘Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effects of Public Information’, banning minors from accessing information about homosexuality,
G. ker ostaja nepojasnjeno, kaj v zakonu o oglaševanju pomeni izkazovanje ali promocija spolne usmerjenosti,
G. whereas the meaning of ‘manifestation or promotion of sexual orientation’ in the Law on Advertising remains unclear,
H. ker je to resolucijo spodbudil niz zaskrbljujočih dogodkov, na primer sprejetje zakona o zaščiti mladoletnikov pred škodljivimi učinki javnega obveščanja, poskus lokalnih oblasti, da bi prepovedale organizacijo pohodov za enakost in gejevskih parad, ter podžigajoč, grozilen in sovražen govor vodilnih politikov in poslancev,
H. whereas this resolution was triggered by a series of worrying events such as the adoption of the Law on the Protection of Minors against the Detrimental Effects of Public Information, the attempted prohibition by local authorities on holding equality and gay pride marches, and the use by leading politicians and parliamentarians of inflammatory or threatening language and hate speech,
I. ker so 17. maja 2010, na mednarodni dan proti homofobiji, vse vrste homofobije in diskriminacije na podlagi spolne usmerjenosti soglasno obsodili podpredsednica Komisije Viviane Reding, visoka predstavnica Evropske unije Catherine Ashton, predsednik Evropskega sveta Herman van Rompuy in predsednik Evropskega parlamenta Jerzy Buzek,
I. whereas Commission Vice-President Viviane Reding, High Representative of the European Union Catherine Ashton , President of the European Council Herman van Rompuy and President of the European Parliament Jerzy Buzek unanimously condemned any kind of homophobia and discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation on 17 May 2010, International Day against Homophobia,
J. ker je Svetovna zdravstvena organizacija leta 1990 homoseksualnost umaknila s seznama duševnih bolezni; ker ni nobena verodostojna raziskava pokazala, da bi spolna vzgoja otrok in mladostnikov lahko vplivala na njihovo spolno usmerjenost, in ker vzgoja o spolni različnosti spodbuja strpnost in sprejemanje razlik,
J. whereas homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness by the World Health Organization in 1990, whereas no credible research indicates that educating children and young people about sexuality may affect their sexual orientation and whereas education about sexual diversity encourages tolerance and acceptance of differences,
2. poziva seimas, naj zavrne predlog spremembe zakona o upravnih prekrških, vključi spolno usmerjenost na seznam razlogov za zaščito v zakonu o izobraževanju, omogoči mladoletnikom, da prosto dostopajo do informacij o spolni usmerjenosti, in pojasni pomen prepovedi v zakonu o oglaševanju;
Calls on the Seimas to reject the draft amendments to the Code of Administrative Offences, include sexual orientation in the list of protected grounds in the Law on Education, enable minors to freely access information on sexual orientation, and clarify the meaning of the ban in the Law on Advertising;
6. naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic in držav kandidatk, predsedniku in parlamentu Republike Litve, Agenciji EU za temeljne pravice in komisarju Sveta Evrope za človekove pravice.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and candidate countries, the President and Parliament of the Republic of Lithuania, the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights and the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights.
PE455.859v01-00 B7‑0032/2011 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o obnovi Haitija leto po potresu
PE455.859v01-00 B7‑0032/2011 European Parliament resolution on Haiti's reconstruction one year after the earthquake
– ob upoštevanju prejšnje resolucije z dne 10. februarja 2010 o potresu na Haitiju,
– having regard to its previous resolution of 10 February 2010 on the earthquake in Haiti,
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave podpredsednice in visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko Catherine Ashton, komisarja EU za razvoj Andrisa Pielbagsa in komisarke EU za humanitarno pomoč Kristaline Georgieve o razmerah na Haitiju eno leto dni po potresu v Bruslju, 11. januarja 2011,
– having regard to the Joint Statement of Vice-President and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Catherine Ashton, EU Commissioner for Development, Andris Piebalgs, and the EU Commissioner for Humanitarian aid, Kristalina Georgieva, on the situation in Haiti, 1 year after the earthquake, Brussels, 11 January 2011,
– ob upoštevanju misije Skupne parlamentarne skupščine AKP-EU o misiji za ugotavljanje dejstev na Haitiju in v Dominikanski republiki z dne 30. avgusta 2010;
– having regard to the ACP-EU Joint parliamentary assembly’s report on the fact finding mission to Haiti and the Dominican Republic, 30 August 2010,
– ob upoštevanju misije Odbora za razvoj za ugotavljanje dejstev na Haitiju in v Dominikanski republiki (25.-27. junij 2010) in njenega poročila,
– having regard to the Committee for Development fact finding mission in Haiti and its report, 25-27 June 2010,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Evropske komisije o evropskih zmogljivostih za odzivanje v izrednih razmerah z dne 26. oktobra 2010,
– having regard to the European Commission communication on the European Emergency Response Capacity of 26 October 2010,
– ob upoštevanju skupnega dokumenta podpredsednice Komisije/visoke predstavnice Unije za zunanje zadeve in varnostno politiko ter komisarke Kristaline Georgieve o pridobljenih izkušnjah iz odziva EU med nesrečo na Haitiju iz junija 2010,
– having regard to the joint document by Catherine Ashton, Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and Kristalina Georguieva, Member of the Commission, on the lessons to be learned from the EU response to the disaster in Haiti, June 2010,