natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da so med državami pri sredstvih, ki se vlagajo v raziskovanje in razvoj, velikanske razlike, in ugotavlja, da so med regijami precejšnje razlike na področju inovacij, ki so v četrtem kohezijskem poročilu izmerjene s koristnim pokazateljem regionalne učinkovitosti na področju inovacij;
Points to the enormous differences between countries in terms of the sums invested in research and development, and notes great regional disparities in terms of innovation, which in the Fourth Cohesion Report are measured by a useful indicator of regional performance in terms of innovation;
se strinja s stališčem Komisije, da kohezijska politika z usmerjanjem javnih naložb v projekte za oblikovanje bolj dinamičnega gospodarskega tkiva, ki ustvarja rast in spodbuja inovacije, na podlagi sinergije, ki nastaja zaradi učinkovitejšega usklajevanja politike in programov, pozitivno vpliva na Lizbonsko strategijo;
Shares the opinion of the Commission on the leverage effect of cohesion policy vis-à-vis the Lisbon Strategy, which is achieved by virtue of the directing of public investments towards projects that favour the creation of a more dynamic, growth-generating, innovation-stimulating economic fabric based on synergy created by more efficient harmonisation of policies and programmes;
obžaluje, da se inovacijski potencial malih, mikro in obrtniških podjetij kljub zagotovitvi ni ustrezno upošteval pri izvajanju kohezijske politike; zato zahteva izvajanje dejavne politike v podporo vsem oblikam inovacij v teh podjetjih ter tudi poziva Komisijo, da oblikuje možnosti medsebojnega sodelovanja med podjetji, javnim sektorjem, šolami in univerzami, da se v duhu Lizbonske strategije ustvarijo regionalni inovacijski grozdi;
Regrets that the innovation potential of small, micro and craft businesses has not been adequately taken into account in implementing cohesion policy, despite earmarking; therefore calls for the implementation of an active policy to support all forms of innovation in these enterprises and also invites the Commission to create opportunities for mutual co-operation between businesses, the public sector, schools and universities, in order to create regional innovation clusters, in the spirit of the Lisbon Strategy;
poudarja, da se pozitiven vpliv strukturne podpore lahko poveča z uporabo zasebnega sofinanciranja; zahteva nemoteno uvajanje preglednih predpisov in standardnih rešitev za javno-zasebna partnerstva, s čimer bo regijam omogočena uporaba zasebnega kapitala pri doseganju javnih ciljev;
Points out that the leverage effect of structural support can be increased through the use of private co-financing; calls for the swift introduction of transparent rules and standard solutions for public-private partnerships that will enable regions to bring private capital to bear in pursuit of public objectives;
opozarja, da je spoštovanje načela pravila o samodejnem prenehanju pravic za prevzem obveznosti bistvenega pomena za spodbujanje financiranja in hitrega izvajanja projektov s strani organov upravljanja; vztraja, da je treba upoštevati načelo N+2 (in N+3 v novih državah članicah v prvih treh letih finančnega okvira 2007–2013);
Points out that compliance with the automatic decommitment principle is essential in order to encourage the financing and rapid implementation of projects by management authorities; insists that the principle of the N+2 rule (and N+3 in the new Member States during the first three years of the 2007-2013 financial framework) should be adhered to;
opozarja, da so zamude pri izvajanju strukturne politike deloma nastale zaradi prestrogih postopkov in bi zato bilo treba razmisliti o njihovi poenostavitvi ter o jasni razdelitvi odgovornosti in pristojnosti med Evropsko unijo in državami članicami;
Points out that the delays in implementing structural policy are due in part to the excessive rigidity of procedures and that, consequently, consideration should be given to simplifying those procedures and clearly dividing responsibilities and competences between the EU and the Member States;
ugotavlja, da bo v programskem obdobju 2007–2013 s sistemom usmerjanja proračunskih sredstev inovacijam namenjenih 64 % sredstev iz cilja 1 (konvergenca) in 80 % sredstev iz cilja 2 (regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje), kar pomeni 55 000 milijonov EUR več kot v prejšnjem obdobju; ugotavlja, da je stopnja porabe namenskih sredstev odvisna od tega, ali so najmanj razvite regije številčno in kakovostno sposobne izpeljati raziskovalne, razvojne in inovativne projekte in tako ustrezno porabiti sredstva, ne da bi jih preusmerile v naložbe z nizko vrednostjo;
Notes, with reference to the programming period 2007-2013, that the system of earmarking appropriations will direct 64% of Objective 1 (convergence) resources and 80% of Objective 2 (regional competitiveness and employment) resources towards innovation, representing EUR 55 000 million more than in the previous period; observes that making use of those appropriations hinges on the capacity of the less developed regions to manage research, development and innovation projects in sufficient number and of such quality as will ensure that they are utilised and not diverted towards investments of little value;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni sistem usmerjanja proračunskih sredstev in njegov vpliv na regionalna neskladja in njihov razvoj ter naj presodi, ali pri opredelitvi prednostnih nalog ta sistem spodbuja preveliko centralizacijo ali pristop'od zgoraj navzdol"; upa, da se bo to ocenjevanje začelo, ko bo Komisija leta 2008 objavila peto poročilo o napredku o koheziji, ki se bo po pričakovanjih osredotočilo na odnos med kohezijsko politiko in prednostnimi nalogami Lizbonske strategije glede rasti in zaposlovanja za vse regije;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the earmarking system and its impact on the evolution of regional disparities and to ascertain whether, in the definition of priorities, this system does not encourage too centralised or 'top-down' an approach; hopes that this evaluation will begin with the publication in 2008 by the Commission of the Fifth Progress Report on Cohesion which, it is anticipated, will concentrate on the relation between cohesion policy and the Lisbon Strategy growth and employment priorities for all regions;
poudarja, da kohezijska politika ne more dajati prednosti že tako dinamičnim regijam, do česar bi lahko prišlo zaradi strogega določanja proračunskih sredstev; opozarja, da bo kohezijska politika z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe vključevala tri cilje gospodarske, socialne in ozemeljske kohezije, ki presegajo Lizbonsko strategijo;
Stresses that cohesion policy must not favour already dynamic regions, which would happen if there were strict earmarking of appropriations; recalls that, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, cohesion policy will embrace the three objectives of economic, social and territorial cohesion, which go beyond the Lisbon Strategy;
zahteva, da se v Lizbonsko strategijo vključi tudi ozemeljska razsežnost, kar bo omogočilo upoštevanje značilnosti posameznih regij, spodbudilo vseevropsko sinergijo in sodelovanje, s posebno podporo oblikovanju in izvajanju široko zasnovanih inovativnih dejavnosti;
Calls for the Lisbon Strategy to be broadened to include the territorial dimension, allowing characteristics specific to the regions to be taken into account, while encouraging trans-European synergies and cooperation, with special support for the creation and implementation of broad-based innovative activities;
poudarja, da obseg kohezijske politike ne more biti omejen na izpolnjevanje ciljev Lizbonske strategije; meni, da je doseganje ozemeljske kohezije z ukrepom v okviru konvergenčnega cilja predpogoj za dolgoročno konkurenčnost regij; zato meni, da je treba cilj 1 (konvergenca) in cilj 2 (regionalna konkurenčnost in zaposlovanje) v prihodnosti obravnavati kot dopolnilo, vsekakor tudi kot dopolnilo cilju 3 (evropsko teritorialno sodelovanje);
Emphasises that the scope of cohesion policy cannot be confined to meeting the Lisbon Strategy objectives; takes the view that achieving territorial cohesion by means of actions under the convergence objective is a precondition for the long-term competitiveness of regions; considers, therefore, that Objective 1 (convergence), Objective 2 (regional competitiveness and employment) should be treated as complementary in the future, and indeed complementary also with Objective 3 (European territorial cooperation);
poziva Komisijo, naj v prihodnjo zeleno knjigo o zemeljski koheziji (predvideno za september 2008) vključi opredelitev ozemeljske kohezije, da bi dosegli napredek v tej politiki Skupnosti;
Calls on the Commission to include a definition of 'territorial cohesion' in the forthcoming Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion (scheduled for September 2008) in order to make further progress in this Community policy;
poudarja pomen pravega partnerstva in dejanskega upravljanja na več ravneh, ki vključuje tako raven Skupnosti kot nacionalno, regionalno in lokalno raven, v posvetovanju z gospodarskimi in socialnimi partnerji – pri opredelitvi in izvajanju ciljev regionalnega razvoja, s čimer se zagotovi, da se področje uporabe prednostnih nalog, opredeljenih na evropski ravni, ne zmanjša, kadar se izvajajo na nacionalni, regionalni ali lokalni ravni ("pristop od spodaj navzgor") in da se izogne tveganju izključitve udeležencev, ki sodelujejo pri lokalnem razvoju in koheziji, kar je pogost primer v urbanistični politiki;
Stresses the importance of real partnership and the implementation of genuinely multi-level governance involving every level – Community, national, regional and local, in consultation with economic and social partners – in defining and implementing regional development objectives, ensuring that the scope of action priorities defined at European level is not narrowed down when they are implemented at national, regional or local level ("bottom-up approach") and in order to avoid any risk of excluding players involved in local development and cohesion, as is often the case with urban policy;
predlaga, da se prednost nameni politikam za resnični policentrični razvoj ozemlja, s čimer bi se zmanjšal pritisk na glavna mesta in spodbudil nastanek drugotnih polov; meni, da se v tej zvezi ne sme spregledati podpore podeželju in pomembne vloge, ki jo imajo tam mala in srednje velika mesta na podeželskih območjih;
Proposes that priority be given to policies that serve a genuinely polycentric development of territories, such that the pressures on capital cities are lessened and the emergence of secondary poles is encouraged; considers that support for rural areas and the important role played by small and medium-sized towns located in rural areas should not be overlooked in this connection;
poziva k sprejetju praktičnih ukrepov za zmanjšanje razlik med ozemeljsko dostopnimi regijami in regijami s strukturnimi pomanjkljivostmi, in sicer otoki, gorskimi območji, redko naseljenimi območji ter obrobnimi mejnimi regijami, pri čemer se priznava njihov slabši položaj ter sprejmejo posebni in trajni ukrepi za podporo tem regijam; ponovno potrjuje svojo zavezanost upoštevanju posebnih omejitev najbolj oddaljenih regij;
Calls also for practical steps to be taken to reduce the disparities between territorially accessible regions and regions with structural disadvantages, namely islands, mountain areas, sparsely populated areas and peripheral and border regions, recognising the disadvantaged position of the latter and taking special and permanent measures to support them; reaffirms its attachment to taking account of the specific handicaps of the outermost regions;
priporoča boljše povezovanje vprašanj mestnega okolja in podeželja; poudarja, da je treba razvoj podeželja usklajevati z ukrepi, ki se izvajajo v okviru regionalne politike; v zvezi s tem je zaskrbljen glede koristnosti ločenega pristopa h koheziji in razvoju podeželja (prek Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja); poziva k študiji posledic vedno večjega financiranja razvoja podeželja z obvezno modulacijo;
Recommends better interlinking of urban and rural issues; emphasises that the development of rural areas should be coordinated with actions implemented in the framework of regional policy; is concerned, in this connection, about the usefulness of a separate approach to cohesion and rural development (via the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development); calls for a study on the consequences of increasing funding for rural development by means of the mechanisms of compulsory modulation;
opozarja na nevarnost razdelitve politik na sektorje in podpira oblikovanje celovitega pristopa, opredeljuje možno sinergijo med kohezijsko politiko in osrednjimi sektorskimi politikami, kot so promet, kmetijstvo, ribištvo, razvoj podeželja, okolje in energetika ter raziskave in tehnologija;
Warns against the dangers of the sectorisation of policies and favours the development of an integrated approach that identifies the synergies that are possible between cohesion policy and major sectoral policies such as transport, agriculture, fisheries, rural development, environment and energy, research and technology;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svojih prihodnjih poročilih preuči, do kolikšne mere so posamezni instrumenti in politike, vključno s kohezijsko politiko, prispevali k napredku na področju ekonomske in socialne kohezije; meni, da je treba preučiti dosežke in težave na vseh pomembnih področjih, še posebej na področju Lizbonske strategije;
Calls on the Commission to analyse in its future reports the extent to which different instruments and policies, including cohesion policy, have contributed to the progress achieved in the field of economic and social cohesion; considers that achievements and problems need to be analysed in all important fields, in particular that of the Lisbon Strategy.
pričakuje, da bo rezultat razprav o kohezijski politiki po letu 2013 dodelitev posebnega pomena regijam na zunanjih mejah Skupnosti, da se zagotovi čezmejna stabilnost in blaginja, ki bo končno privedla do razvoja obmejnih regij EU ter večje kohezije in konkurenčnosti celotne Skupnosti;
Expects the discussions on post-2013 cohesion policy to result in regions located on external borders of the Community being given special importance in order to ensure stability and prosperity across borders that will ultimately result in not only the development of EU border regions but also greater cohesion and competitiveness for the Community as a whole.
poudarja, da mora boj proti prostorskemu ločevanju in socialni izključenosti, katerega cilj je doseganje trajnostne in uravnotežene rasti, temeljiti na previdni stanovanjski politiki, ki spada na področje širšega lokalnega razvoja, urbanističnega načrtovanja in strategije za upravljanje lokalnih javnih storitev;
Points out that combating 'spatial segregation' and social exclusion, with a view to achieving sustainable and balanced growth, requires the support of a careful housing policy, coming under a broader local development, urban planning and local public service management strategy;
v zvezi s tem pozdravlja sprejetje akcijskega programa za izvajanje Teritorialne agende in Leipziške listine za zagotovitev, da se ozemeljsko razsežnost bolje vključi v vse javne politike na ravni Skupnosti, držav članic in na lokalni ravni, ter pričakuje uresničitev tega v praksi; ob upoštevanju nameravanega razširjanja ekonomske in socialne kohezije v skladu z Lizbonsko pogodbo glede vključitve ozemeljskega vidika je treba razviti ustrezne kazalnike za opredelitev vsebine ozemeljske kohezije;
Welcomes, in this connection, the adoption of an action programme for the implementation of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter to ensure that the territorial dimension is better integrated into all public policies at Community, national and local levels and awaits the practical manifestation thereof; in view of the intended expansion of economic and social cohesion under the Lisbon Treaty to include a territorial component, suitable indicators need to be developed to define the content of territorial cohesion;
izraža zadovoljstvo nad tem, da je Komisija napovedala objavo zelene knjige o ozemeljski koheziji, ki naj bi bila sprejeta septembra 2008, in se zavzema, da bi zelena knjiga obsegala konkretne rešitve za celovit pristop;
Welcomes the announcement by the Commission of its forthcoming Green Paper on territorial cohesion, which is expected to be adopted in September 2008, and asks that it include concrete guidelines for the implementation of the integrated approach;
se zaveda pomena rednega sodelovanja med Evropskim parlamentom, ki ga predstavlja Odbor za regionalni razvoj, in Odborom regij na temo prihodnosti regionalne politike;
Is aware of the importance of regular cooperation between Parliament, represented by its Committee on Regional Development, and the Committee of the Regions on the subject of the future of regional policy;
meni, da bo Unija v prihodnosti vse bolj soočena z novimi izzivi, ki bodo močno zaznamovali njeno ozemlje, ki bodo še povečali ovire za regionalni razvoj, kot so demografske spremembe, koncentracija prebivalstva v mestih, migracije (ki so zlasti težavne za podeželje in obrobna območja), energetska oskrba in podnebna vprašanja ter prilagajanje na spremembe zaradi globalizacije, kakor tudi širitev in sosedska politika; v zvezi s tem poudarja pomen pilotnih projektov, povezanih s prilagajanjem regij novim izzivom;
Takes the view that, in the future, the Union will be increasingly faced with new challenges with a strong territorial impact exacerbating existing obstacles to regional development, such as demographic change, urban concentration, migratory movements (which are particularly problematic for rural and peripheral areas), energy supply and climate issues and adjustment to the changes arising from globalisation, as well as enlargement and neighbourhood policies; stresses in this context the importance of pilot projects relating to the adaptation of regions to these new challenges;
poziva k rednim analizam stroškov in posledic mogočih bodočih širitev na strukturno politiko pred začetkom vseh pristopnih pogajanj ter upa, da bo lahko prevzel večjo vlogo pri širitvi in sosedski politiki ter sodeloval pri oblikovanju predpristopnih instrumentov, ki bodo zavezujoči;
Calls for regular analyses of the costs and structural-policy implications of possible future enlargements before the start of any new accession negotiations and hopes that it can play a greater part in the enlargement and neighbourhood policies, with its participation in the shaping of pre-accession instruments to be made binding;
poudarja resnost težave odseljevanja v več delih EU, ki vključuje staranje prebivalstva, izgubo človeškega kapitala, beg kapitala, dražje storitve itd.;
Emphasises the seriousness of the problem of depopulation in many parts of the EU, involving as it does the ageing of the population, the loss of human capital, capital flight, more expensive services, and so on;
meni, da imajo lahko demografske spremembe velik ozemeljski vpliv, kot so odseljevanje na nekaterih območjih, zlasti manj razvitih podeželskih območjih, kar spremlja koncentracija prebivalstva v mestih in starajoča se družba, ali razvoj rezidenčne gospodarske dejavnosti v drugih, ki zahteva razvoj posebnih inovativnih strategij za reševanje njihovih težav, kar pa zahteva posebno prizadevanje za ohranitev storitev splošnega gospodarskega pomena in zagotovitev visokega standarda univerzalnih storitev;
Takes the view that demographic trends can have a major territorial impact, such as the depopulation of certain areas, especially the less developed rural areas, accompanied by urban concentration and an ageing society, or the development of the residential economy in others, which requires the development of specific innovative strategies to resolve their problems, necessitating a particular effort to maintain services of general economic interest and ensure a high standard of universal services;
ugotavlja, da bo učinek podnebnih sprememb različen, zlasti z vidika pogostejših in hujših naravnih nesreč, kot so gozdni požari, suše in poplave, ki bodo zahtevale različne odzive v posameznih regijah EU in s katerimi se bodo morale spoprijeti tako, da bodo pregledale in prilagodile svoje strategije trajnostnega razvoja za doseganje ciljev EU za zmanjšanje emisij CO2; verjame, da mora biti kohezijska politika EU podnebju prijazna, vendar opozarja, da so možnosti, ki so na voljo za kohezijsko politiko na tem področju, omejene; meni, da bi morale boj proti podnebnim spremembam obravnavati tudi druge politike Skupnosti;
Notes that climate change will have variable repercussions, in particular in terms of more frequent and severe natural disasters, such as forest fires, droughts and floods, which will call for responses that differ from one region of the EU to another and which the regions must tackle by reviewing and adapting their sustainable development strategies for achieving the EU's objective of cutting CO2 emissions; believes that EU cohesion policy should be 'climate-friendly', but recalls that the possibilities open to cohesion policy in this area are limited; takes the view that fighting climate change should also be addressed under other Community policies;
opozarja tudi, da je v okviru oblikovanja učinkovite svetovne politike za zagotovitev zaščite pred naravnimi nesrečami pomembno sprejeti predlog Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o ustanovitvi Solidarnostnega sklada Evropske unije ( KOM(2005)0108 ), ki na regionalni ravni zagotavlja pravočasen in ustrezen odziv na naravne nesreče, ki določene regije pogosto hudo prizadenejo zaradi njihove zemljepisne lege;
Recalls also within the framework of the formulation of an effective global policy to provide protection from natural disasters the importance of adopting the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund ( COM(2005)0108 ), which provides a more timely and adequate response to natural disasters of regional scale, which are often devastating in certain regions because of their geographical situation;
meni, da lahko vprašanje energetske oskrbe in zviševanja cen energije zaradi močne energetske odvisnosti večine držav članic EU sproži bistvene prostorske posledice v regijah, zlasti na podeželju ter v gorskih, otoških, zelo oddaljenih in obrobnih regijah, ki so odvisne od prometnih povezav in torej cene energije; poudarja, da lahko razvoj obnovljivih virov energije ter naložbe v energetsko učinkovitost in v decentralizirane napajalne enote ponujajo velike možnosti za regionalni in lokalni razvoj v prihodnosti;
Takes the view that the issues of energy supply and increasing energy prices can have major spatial implications for territories as a result of the strong energy dependence of most Member States, particularly in rural, mountain, island, very remote as well as outermost regions because of their dependence on transport, which is highly sensitive to energy costs; points out that the development of renewable energy sources and investment in energy efficiency and in decentralised supply units could offer local and regional development opportunities;
vztraja pri zahtevi, da se neporabljena sredstva po pravilu n+2 ali n+3 ponovno namenijo za kohezijsko politiko in se tako kar najboljše izkoristijo nizki razpoložljivi viri;
Reiterates its request relating to the reutilisation of unspent appropriations, under the N+2 or N+3 rule applicable to cohesion policy, with a view to maximising the scarce resources available;