natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
– Poleg ukrepov, ki državam članicam omogočajo višjo stopnjo črpanja sredstev iz Evropskega sklada za ribištvo, je nujna preusmeritev prednostnih nalog Evropskega sklada za ribištvo, ki se mora osredotočiti zlasti na pomoč proizvodnim dejavnostim (prenovitev in posodobitev flot, s čimer bi se izboljšala njihova trajnost, večja selektivnost ribolovnih orodij, zamenjava motorjev itd.) in na razvoj obalnih skupnosti.
– Alongside measures designed to encourage greater take-up of EFF appropriations by the Member States, the priorities of the EFF itself also need to be reconfigured so that they are primarily focused on supporting productive activity (fleet renewal and modernisation, increased sustainability, improved selectivity of fishing gear, engine replacement, etc.) and the development of coastal communities.
– Uredba (ES) št. 861/2006 o vzpostavitvi finančnih ukrepov Unije za izvajanje skupne ribiške politike in na področju pomorskega prava je drugi pomemben finančni instrument Unije v ribištvu, ki ga ta predlog Komisije ne zadeva.
– Regulation (EC) No 861/2006 establishing Community financial measures for the implementation of the common fisheries policy and in the area of the Law of the Sea, another important EU financial instrument in the field of fisheries, is not concerned by the Commission proposal under review.
V tej uredbi so predvidene naložbe v pomembna področja, in sicer v mednarodne odnose, upravljanje, zbiranje podatkov in znanstveno svetovanje ter nadzor in izvajanje skupne ribiške politike, kjer so prav tako opazne težave pri nacionalnem sofinanciranju.
This regulation makes provision for financing in key areas - international relations, governance, data collection and scientific advice, and control and enforcement of the CFP - which are also being affected by national co-financing difficulties.
Nekatera od teh področij so odločilna za zagotavljanje trajnega upravljanja ribištva, temelječega na znanju.
Some of these areas are crucial for sustainable, knowledge-based fisheries management.
Odstotki sofinanciranja Unije so na splošno dokaj nizki (največ 50 %), zato ne razumemo, zakaj predlog Komisije ne obravnava tudi te uredbe.
Given that the percentages of Community co-financing are generally relatively low (a maximum of 50% in most cases), it is difficult to understand why this regulation is not also covered by the present Commission proposal.
Sprememba Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1198/2006 o Evropskem skladu za ribištvo
Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 on the European Fisheries Fund.
o osnutku sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in vlado Republike Indonezije o nekaterih vidikih zračnih prevozov
on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on certain aspects of air services
– ob upoštevanju osnutka sklepa Sveta (13238/2011),
– having regard to the draft Council decision (13238/2011),
– ob upoštevanju osnutka Sporazuma med Evropsko unijo in vlado Republike Indonezije o nekaterih vidikih zračnih prevozov (10843/3/2010),
– having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia on certain aspects of air services (10843/3/2010),
– ob upoštevanju zahteve za odobritev, ki jo je Svet vložil v skladu s členom 100(2) in točko (a) drugega pododstavka člena 218(6) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije ( C7-0242/2011 ),
– having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 100(2) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( C7-0242/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A7–448/2011 ),
– having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A7-0448/2011 ),
Evropsko sodišče je leta 2002 razsodilo, da so nacionalne klavzule o določitvi v bilateralnih sporazumih v nasprotju s pravnim redom EU.
The EU Court of Justice ruled in 2002 that national designation clauses in the bilateral agreements infringe EU law.
Tretji državi omogočajo, da zavrne, odvzame ali začasno prekliče dovoljenja ali pooblastila letalskega prevoznika, ki ga je sicer določila država članica, vendar ni v pretežni lasti in pod dejanskim nadzorom navedene države članice ali oseb z njenim državljanstvom.
They allow a third country to reject, withdraw or suspend the permissions or authorisations of an air carrier that has been designated by a Member State but that is not substantially owned and effectively controlled by that Member State or its nationals.
Zato je Komisija s pogajanji uskladila sporazum, ki nadomešča nekatere določbe obstoječih 19 dvostranskih sporazumov o zračnem prevozu, ki so jih države članice EU sklenile z Indonezijo.
Thus, the Commission has negotiated the Agreement that replaces certain provisions in the existing 19 bilateral air services agreements concluded between EU Member States and Indonesia.
Člen 2 (klavzula o določitvi): da bi preprečili diskriminacijo med letalskimi prevozniki EU, se nacionalne klavzule o določitvi, ki veljajo za letalske prevoznike države članice, ki so pogodbenice dvostranskega sporazuma, nadomestijo s klavzulo EU o določitvi, ki se nanaša na vse letalske prevoznike EU.
Article 2 (Designation clause): To avoid discrimination between EU air carriers, the national designation clauses, referring to air carriers of the Member State party to the bilateral agreement, are replaced by an EU designation clause, referring to all EU carriers.
Cilj je omogočiti vsem letalskimi prevoznikom EU nediskriminacijski dostop do zračnih poti med državami članicami EU in Indonezijo.
The objective is to give all EU air carriers non-discriminatory access to routes between the EU Member States concerned and Indonesia.
Člen 3 (varnost): ta določba zagotavlja, da določbe o varnosti iz dvostranskih sporazumov veljajo tudi za primere, ko predpisanega nadzora nad letalskim prevoznikom ne izvaja država članica, ki je letalskega prevoznika določila.
Article 3 (Safety): This provision ensures that safety provisions in bilateral agreements are applicable to situations when regulatory control over an air carrier is exercised by Member State other than Member State that designated that air carrier.
Člen 4 (obdavčitev letalskega goriva): medtem ko običajni dvostranski sporazumi večinoma omogočajo oprostitev obdavčitve goriva za mednarodne lete, Direktiva Sveta 2003/96/ES dovoljuje tako obdavčitev za dejavnosti v Evropski uniji, če so izpolnjeni določeni pogoji.
Article 4 (Taxation of aviation fuel): Whereas traditional bilateral agreements tend to exempt international flights from fuel taxation, Council Directive 2003/96/EC permits such taxation for operations within the EU, provided that certain conditions are met.
Namen sporazuma je razširiti pravico držav članic na indonezijske letalske prevoznike, ki želijo izvajati lete znotraj Unije.
The aim of the Agreement is to expand that right of Member States to Indonesian airlines wishing to operate intra-Union flights.
Člen 5 (skladnost s pravili o konkurenci): Člen prepoveduje protikonkurenčno prakso.
Article 5 (Compatibility with competition rules): This Article prohibits anti-competitive practices.
Sporazum je bil podpisan 29. junija 2011 in pogodbenici sta se dogovorili, da bosta v času od podpisa do začetka veljavnosti ravnali v skladu s sporazumom.
The Agreement was signed on 29 June 2011 and the two parties have agreed to act in accordance with the agreement from the time of signature until it comes into force.
V skladu s členom 81 svojega poslovnika Parlament sprejme sklep z enim glasovanjem, predlogov sprememb sporazuma pa ni mogoče vložiti.
In accordance with Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure the Parliament shall take a decision by means of a single vote, and no amendments to the agreement itself may be tabled.
Poročevalec predlaga, naj odbor TRAN poda pozitivno mnenje za sklenitev tega sporazuma.
Your Rapporteur suggests that the TRAN committee should give a favourable opinion on the conclusion of the Agreement.
Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Philippe De Backer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Kumucakos (Georgios Koumoutsakos), Werner Kuhn, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gesine Meissner, Hubert Pirker, David-Maria Sassoli, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada
Inés Ayala Sender, Georges Bach, Izaskun Bilbao Barandica, Antonio Cancian, Michael Cramer, Philippe De Backer, Luis de Grandes Pascual, Saïd El Khadraoui, Ismail Ertug, Carlo Fidanza, Knut Fleckenstein, Jacqueline Foster, Mathieu Grosch, Jim Higgins, Juozas Imbrasas, Ville Itälä, Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Georgios Koumoutsakos, Werner Kuhn, Jörg Leichtfried, Eva Lichtenberger, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Gesine Meissner, Hubert Pirker, David-Maria Sassoli, Vilja Savisaar-Toomast, Debora Serracchiani, Brian Simpson, Keith Taylor, Silvia-Adriana Ţicău, Peter van Dalen, Dominique Vlasto, Artur Zasada
o predlogu uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 302/2009 o vzpostavitvi večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju
on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 302/2009 concerning a multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean
MNENJE Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ...................12
OPINION of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety 13
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( COM(2011)0330 ),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2011)0330 ),
– ob upoštevanju člena 294(2) in člena 43(2) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, na podlagi katerih je Komisija podala predlog Parlamentu ( C7–0154/2011 ),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C7‑0154/2011 ),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora z dne 26. oktobra 2011
– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 26 October 2011
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ribištvo in mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ( A7-0449/2011 ),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ( A7-0449/2011 ),
(1) Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev atlantskega tuna (International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna – ICCAT) je sprejela Priporočilo 10-04 o spremembi večletnega načrta za obnovo staleža modroplavutega tuna.
(1) The International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT) has adopted a Recommendation 10-04 amending the multiannual recovery plan for bluefin tuna.
Da bi se stalež obnovil, so v priporočilu določeni dodatno zmanjšanje celotnega dovoljenega ulova (total allowable catch – TAC) ter strožji ukrepi za zmanjšanje ribolovne zmogljivosti in strožji nadzorni ukrepi, zlasti v zvezi s postopki prenosa in reje v mrežasti kletki.
In order to rebuild the stock, the recommendation provides for a further reduction of the total allowable catch, for strengthening measures to reduce the fishing capacity and for reinforcing the control measures, in particular as regards the transfer and the caging operations.
Priporočilo ICCAT poudarja, da je treba hitro ugotoviti, kje točno se nahajajo drstišča.
The ICCAT recommendation highlights the need to properly identify spawning grounds as a matter of urgency.
Njihova zaščita je temeljnega pomena za končni uspeh načrta za obnovo staleža in tega se morajo zavedati vse pogodbenice.
The protection of spawning grounds will be central to the ultimate success of the recovery plan and this should be borne in mind by all CPCs.
Člen 24 – odstavek 8 – pododstavek 2
Article 24 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
Če se preiskava ne konča v 10 delovnih dneh ali izsledki preiskave kažejo, da število ali povprečna teža modroplavutega tuna za 10 % presega število ali povprečno težo, ki jo je navedel upravljavec ribogojnice, država pogodbenica zastave ali država članica, pristojna za plovilo za ulov, izda nalog za izpust presežnih količin .
If the investigation is not concluded within 10 working days or if the outcome of the investigation indicates that the number and /or average weight of bluefin tuna is in excess of 10 % of that declared by the farm operator, the flag CPC or Member State responsible for the catching vessel shall issue a release order for the quantities in excess.
Če se preiskava ne konča v 10 delovnih dneh ali izsledki preiskave kažejo, da število in/ali povprečna teža modroplavutega tuna za 10 % presega število in/ali povprečno težo, ki jo je navedel upravljavec ribogojnice, država pogodbenica zastave ali država članica, pristojna za plovilo za ulov, izda nalog za izpust presežnega števila in/ali teže .
If the investigation is not concluded within 10 working days or if the outcome of the investigation indicates that the number and / or average weight of bluefin tuna is in excess of 10 % of that declared by the farm operator, the flag CPC or Member State responsible for the catching vessel shall issue a release order for the number and /or weight in excess.
V odstavku se stalno navajata število in teža, zato naj se to ne spreminja.
The specific references to number and weight have been used throughout the same paragraph and should not be changed.
Ista izraza sta uporabljena tudi v priporočilu ICCAT.
This is also the wording used in the ICCAT recommendation.
Izraz „količina“ je manj natančen.
The word 'quantities' is less precise.
Mednarodna komisija za ohranitev atlantskega tuna (ICCAT) je novembra 2010 spremenila večletni načrt za obnovo vzhodnega staleža modroplavutega tuna.
In November 2010, in Paris, the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tuna (ICCAT) amended its multiannual recovery plan for the eastern stock of bluefin tuna.
Ker je Evropska unija pogodbenica ICCAT, je dolžna te spremembe prenesti v svojo zakonodajo.
As the EU is a contracting party to ICCAT it is obliged to transpose those amendments into EU law.
V tem poročilu je obravnavan predlog Komisije v ta namen.
It is the Commission's proposal to that end that is the subject of the present report.
Zgodovina upravljanja ulova modroplavutega tuna je dolga, zapletena in ima vsaj doslej malo uspehov.
The history of management of the bluefin tuna fishery is long, complicated and, thus far at least, not crowned with success.
Čeprav ribolov modroplavutega tuna poteka že tisočletja, so se resne težave začele v 90-ih letih, ko se je začela uporabljati praksa gojenja modroplavutega tuna v kletkah, da bi jih spitali za japonski trg.
Though the stock has been fished for millenia, the problems began in earnest in the 1990s when the practice of caging bluefin in order to fatten them up for the Japanese market was introduced.
Povpraševanju japonskega trga se je zadostilo z nenadzorovanim in v Evropski uniji močno subvencioniranim povečanjem flote z zaporno plavarico, ki je lovila stalež v Sredozemskem morju.
Japanese market demand was met through an uncontrolled – and heavily subsidized in the case of the EU – expansion in the size of the purse seine fleet targeting the Mediterranean stock.
Obseg regulacije kaže na kompleksnost ribištva in potrebo po nenehni pozornosti ICCAT.
The complexity of the fishery and the need for constant vigilence on the part of ICCAT is demonstrated by the volume of regulation.
V zadnjih 20 letih je bilo sprejetih 64 ukrepov za upravljanje, med katerimi jih je 13 še vedno v veljavi.
During the past 20 years, 64 management measures have been adopted, of which 13 are still in effect.
Zlasti pomembna sta dva.
Two are of particular importance.
Prvi načrt za obnove staleža je bil sprejet leta 2006 na 14 straneh skupaj s prilogami.
The recovery plan was first adopted in 2006, when it was 14 pages long, including annexes.
Spremenjen je bil leta 2008, nato 2009 in ponovno leta 2010, ko se je povečal na 30 strani.
It was amended in 2008, 2009 and again in 2010, by which time it had swollen to 30 pages.
Leta 2007 je bil sprejet tudi sistem dokumentacije o ulovu, ki je bil nato spremenjen leta 2008 in 2009.
There is also a catch documentation scheme, adopted in 2007 and amended in 2008 and 2009.
Ta dokument je precej krajši, ima 18 strani.
This document rather shorter, at 18 pages.
Tudi zakonodaja Evropske unije ni nič manj obsežna.
The EU legislation is no less voluminous.
Tako je ribolov vzhodnega modroplavutega tuna najstrožje reguliran ribolov v Evropski uniji in verjetno eden najbolj reguliranih na svetu.
Consequently, the fishery for the eastern bluefin is the most tightly regulated fishery in the EU and probably among the most regulated in the world.
Glede na to, da je po mnenju ICCAT treba sprejemati tako podrobne in stroge ukrepe za upravljanje ter jih ojačati skoraj vsako leto, ICCAT očitno težko sledi razvoju ribištva z vidika spremljanja in nadzorovanja njegovih dejavnosti ter omejevanja njegovega vpliva na stalež.
However, the fact that ICCAT considers it necessary to adopt such detailed and stringent management measures and to strengthen them almost on an annual basis suggests that ICCAT is having difficulty in keeping up with the evolving fishery in terms of both monitoring and controlling its activities and limiting its impact on the stock.
Večina določb v teh uredbah je odziv na zapletenost gojenja tuna v kletkah in pitanja, zaradi česar nastajajo številne vrzeli v zakonodaji.
Most of the provisions in these regulations are responses to the complexity of the tuna caging and fattening operations, which create numerous loopholes in the legislation.
V letu 2008 so bili nezakonit ribolov, ki je presegal nacionalne kvote, napačno poročanje in druge težave (pri Evropski uniji in drugih državah) tako razširjeni, da je neodvisni odbor, ki je ocenjeval uspešnost ICCAT, upravljanje ribolova modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju imenoval „mednarodna sramota“.
The extent of illegal fishing, exceeding national quotas, misreporting and other problems (by the EU as well as other countries) was so prevalent in 2008 that an independent panel reviewing ICCAT's performance referred to management of the bluefin fishery in the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean as "an international disgrace".
Evropska unija in države članice so porabile veliko denarja v poskusu, da bi zagotovile spoštovanje teh predpisov.
The EU and its Member States spend large amounts of money in an attempt to ensure compliance with these rules.
Tako so na primer leta 2010 Agencija za nadzor ribištva in države članice uporabljale 27 inšpekcijskih plovil ter 11 letal in helikopterjev.
For 2010 for example, there were 27 inspection vessels and 11 airplanes and helicopters deployed by the Fisheries Control Agency and the Member States.
S tako velikimi naložbami v nadzor se je nedvomno izboljšalo delovanje v skladu s predpisi, vsaj kar zadeva ribolov EU, vendar še vedno zbujajo skrb zgodovinski prelov (EU in drugih), obseg nezakonitega, neprijavljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter raven delovanja v skladu s predpisi drugih pogodbenic.
While such massive investment in control has doubtless led to much better compliance, at least as far as the EU fishery is concerned, many concerns remain about the historical over-fishing (by the EU and others), the extent of current IUU catches and the degree of compliance by other Contracting Parties.
Sedanje stanje
The Current Situation
Stanje staleža modroplavutega tuna v vzhodnem Atlantiku in Sredozemskem morju je sporen že vrsto let.
The status of the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean stock of bluefin tuna has been controversial for many years.
Najnovejšo podrobno oceno je leta 2010 izvedel znanstveni odbor ICCAT (statistični podatki so bili posodobljeni v letu 2011).
The most recent detailed assessment was conducted by the ICCAT scientific committee (SCRS) in 2010 (the statistics were updated in 2011).
Ocena navaja naslednje:
The assessment makes the following points:
· v letih 2008 in 2009 se je „ulov bistveno zmanjšal“ (podatki za leto 2010 niso popolni, saj nekatere države niso sporočile ulova);
· there has been a " substantial decrease in catch " during 2008 and 2009 (2010 data are incomplete since some countries have not reported catches);
· na posameznih območjih je opaziti večje število mladičev;
· there are indications of increasing numbers of juveniles in parts of the range;
· najnovejša gibanja biomase kažejo porast na nekaterih področjih, a upad na drugih;
· recent biomass trends show increases in some scenarios but decreases in others;
· ribolovna umrljivost pri mladih ribah se očitno še naprej povečuje, pri starejših ribah pa v zadnjih letih upada;
· fishing mortality appears to have continued to increase for younger fish while that for older fish has declined in recent years;
· stalež bi lahko obnovili do leta 2019 brez ribolova in do leta 2022 ob sedanjem obsegu ulova.
· rebuilding could be accomplished by 2019 with zero catch and by 2022 with current catch.
Vendar so se te splošno pozitivne točke izkazale za precej relativne glede na naslednje:
However, these generally positive points were heavily qualified:
· potrebni so kazalniki, neodvisni od ribištva, ki bi omogočili bolj zanesljivo oceno;
· indicators independent from the fishery are needed to provide a more reliable assessment;
· kljub boljši kakovosti podatkov še vedno ostajajo „precejšnje omejitve pri podatkih za oceno za leto 2010“;
· despite improvements in data there remain " considerable data limitations for the 2010 assessment ";
· današnja ribolovna umrljivost je previsoka in biomasa prenizka, da bi bila v skladu s cilji ICCAT;
· recent fishing mortality is too high, and biomass too low, to be consistent with ICCAT's objectives;
· za analize „je znano, da so nepopolne zaradi različnih nejasnosti, ki še niso količinsko ovrednotene“, na primer stanje staleža v letu 2009, stopnja nezakonitega, nedovoljenega in nereguliranega ribolova ter plodnost modroplavutega tuna;
· the analyses " are known to be impaired by various sources of uncertainties that have not yet been quantified " including stock status in 2009, level of IUU catches and bluefin productivity;
· še vedno zbujajo skrb „precejšnje presežne zmogljivosti“, ki se ne spreminjajo in s katerimi bi lahko ujeli precej več rib, kot pa jih določajo kvote.
· concerns remain about the " substantial excess capacity " that remains and could easily catch far more fish than the quotas.
Skratka, razmere so precej boljše kot še pred nekaj leti, vendar se lahko močno spremenijo, saj se pri prihodnjih ocenah skuša rešiti sedanje probleme.
In short, the situation is much better than it was even a few years ago but that could change quite dramatically as future assessments attempt to deal with these current problems.
Ravno tako je treba opozoriti, da zbuja skrb vprašanje nespornosti nekaterih podatkov o ribolovu.
It should also be noted that concerns have been raised about the validity of certain data on the fishery.
Ena od novejših analiz
One recent analysis
“Mind the Gap, an Analysis of the Mediterranean Bluefin Trade”, (Pazi, vrzel: analiza trgovine s sredozemskim modroplavutim tunom), dostopno na
“Mind the Gap, an Analysis of the Mediterranean Bluefin Trade”, available at