natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
o domnevah o uporabi evropskih držav za prevoz in nezakonito pridržanje ujetnikov s strani obveščevalne agencije CIA;
on the alleged use of European countries by the CIA for the transportation and illegal detention of prisoners;
24.2.2010 B7-0129/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
24.2.2010 B7-0129/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o ustanovitvi centralnega organa za družinsko pravo v okviru evropskega pravnega prostora
on the establishment of a central family law agency within the European judicial area
PE432.987v01-00 B7‑0129/2009 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o ustanovitvi centralnega organa za družinsko pravo v okviru evropskega pravnega prostora
PE432.987v01-00 B7‑0129/2010 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the establishment of a central family law agency within the European judicial area
– ob upoštevanju Haaške konvencije o mednarodni ugrabitvi otrok z dne 25. oktobra 1980,
– having regard to the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2201/2003 z dne 27. novembra 2003 o pristojnosti in priznavanju ter izvrševanju sodnih odločb v zakonskih sporih in sporih v zvezi s starševsko odgovornostjo UL L 338, 23.12.2003, str.
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p.
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
– having regard to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
– ob upoštevanju Konvencije Združenih narodov o otrokovih pravicah, zlasti člena 29 te konvencije,
– having regard to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and in particular Article 29 thereof,
A. ker obstaja evropski pravni prostor,
A. bearing in mind the existence of the European judicial area,
B. ker so spori za dodelitev otrok v varstvo in vzgojo med zakonci z različnim državljanstvom vedno pogostejši,
B. whereas instances of spouses of different nationalities arguing over child custody arrangements are rising constantly,
C. zaradi neskladnosti družinskega prava držav članic Unije,
C. whereas family law differs from one EU Member State to another,
D. ker se teh razlik ne bi smelo reševati na račun dejanskih interesov mladoletnih otrok,
D. whereas the true interests of minor children must not be sacrificed in resolving these differences,
1. poziva Svet in Komisijo, naj preučita, če bi bilo treba ustanoviti centralni organ za družinsko pravo v okviru evropskega pravnega prostora;
Calls on the Council and the Commission to consider whether a central family law agency should be established within the European Judicial Area;
23.2.2010 B7-0130/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
23.3.2010 B7-0130/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o uvedbi vizualnega sistema za prikaz porabe goriva v avtomobilih
on introducing graphic means of reporting motor vehicle fuel consumption
PE432.988v01-00 B7‑0130/2010 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o uvedbi vizualnega sistema za prikaz porabe goriva v avtomobilih
PE432.988 B7‑0130/2010 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on introducing graphic means of recording motor vehicle fuel consumption
– ob upoštevanju množice tehničnih informacij o porabi goriva v avtomobilih in povezave med porabo in zmogljivostmi oziroma med porabo in ravnjo onesnaževanja,
– having regard to the multiplicity of technical data related to motor vehicle consumption and the links between consumption and performance and between consumption and pollution levels,
– ob upoštevanju zaveze Evropske unije, da do leta 2020 svoje emisije toplogrednih plinov zmanjša za 20 % (sveženj „Energija“),
– having regard to the EU's commitment to a 20% reduction by 2010 in greenhouse gas emissions (the 'Energy Package')
A. ker potrošnik, zlasti v teh časih, posveča najmanj toliko pozornosti porabi goriva v vozilu kot porabi električne energije gospodinjskega aparata,
A. whereas, and especially at the present time, motor vehicle fuel consumption is of at least as much interest to the consumer as the energy consumption of domestic electrical appliances,
1. poziva Komisijo, naj za avtomobile prouči možnost uvedbe obveznega sistema označevanja porabe goriva (npr. energetski razred A bi označeval vozila z najmanjšo porabo, razred G pa vozila, ki so s tega stališča najbolj požrešna);
Calls on the Commission to examine the possibility of introducing a compulsory system of fuel consumption labelling for the motor vehicle sector (for instance, energy category 'A' would be the most consumer-friendly while 'G' would be the least so);
3.3.2010 B7-0131/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 120 poslovnika
1.3.2010 B7-0131/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 120 of the Rules of Procedure
o boju proti borovi ogorčici
on fighting pine nematode disease
PE432.989v01-00 B7‑0131/2010 Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o boju proti borovi ogorčici
PE432.989 B7‑0131/2010 Motion for a European Parliament resolution on fighting pine nematode disease
– ob upoštevanju člena 120 svojega Poslovnika,
– having regard to Rule 120 of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker je borova ogorčica ( Bursaphelenchus xylophilus ) ena najnevarnejših bolezni iglavcev na svetu,
A. whereas pine nematode disease (PND) or Bursaphelenchus xylophilus is one of the most severe diseases to which conifers are liable worldwide,
B. ker se je bolezen, ki je bila najprej omejena na eno od južnih portugalskih regij, pred nedavnim razširila v druge regije EU,
B. whereas this disease, which was initially confined to part of southern Portugal, has now spread to other regions of the EU,
C. ker bolezen pomeni stroge omejitve na področju trženja lesa in stranskih proizvodov ter zahteva vrsto ukrepov za nadzor in zatiranje,
C. whereas it brings in its wake severe restrictions on the marketing of wood and by-products and necessitates a series of control and eradication measures,
D. ker ima bolezen na Portugalskem glede na pomen gozda in gozdarstva, s katerim je povezanih 38 % ozemlja, okrog 400.000 lastnikov gozdov, 14 % industrijskega BDP, 9 % delovnih mest v industriji in 12 % izvoza, hude gospodarske, družbene in okoljske posledice,
D. whereas it has had severe economic, social and environmental consequences in Portugal, given the importance of forestry there and the fact that forests occupy 38% of national territory, in a country with 400 000 owners of forest land where the sector accounts for 14% of industrial GDP, 9% of industrial employment and 12% of exports,
E. ker so v tem primeru evropski gozdovi in z njimi povezane dejavnosti resno ogroženi,
E. whereas severe risks now exist for the EU's forests and related activity,
F. ker sta nujno potrebna zatrtje in nadzor borove ogorčice,
F. whereas the eradication and control of PND is now a matter of urgency,
3.3.2010 B7-0132/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor O‑0027/2010
3.3.2010 B7-0132/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0000/2010‑ O-0027/2010
PE432.991v01-00 B7‑0132/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o uresničevanju enotnega območja plačil v eurih (območja SEPA)
PE432.991v01-00 B7‑0132/2010 European Parliament resolution on the implementation of the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA)
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Komisije in Evropske centralne banke z dne 4. maja 2006 o enotnem območju plačil v eurih,
– having regard to the joint statement from the Commission and the European Central Bank of 4 May 2006 on the Single Euro Payments Area,
– ob upoštevanju priložnostnega dokumenta Evropske centralne banke št. 71 iz avgusta 2007 o gospodarskem vplivu enotnega območja plačil v eurih,
– having regard to the European Central Bank Occasional Paper No 71 of August 2007 on the economic impact of the Single Euro Payments Area,
(direktiva o plačilnih storitvah),
(Payment Services Directive),
– ob upoštevanju resolucije Evropskega parlamenta z dne 12. marca 2009 o uresničevanju enotnega območja plačil v eurih P6_TA(2009)0139
– having regard to the European Parliament resolution of 12 March 2009 on the implementation of the Single Euro Payments Area P6_TA(2009)0139
– ob upoštevanju skupne izjave Evropske komisije in Evropske centralne banke, v kateri so pojasnjena določena načela prihodnjega poslovnega modela SEPA za neposredne bremenitve z dne 24. marca 2009,
– having regard to the joint statement by the European Commission and the European Central Bank clarifying certain principles underlying a future SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) business model of 24 March 2009,
– ob upoštevanju druge študije Komisije o pripravljenosti javne uprave in prehoda na enotno območje plačil v eurih z dne 22. julija 2009,
– having regard to the Commission’s second survey on public administrations’ preparedness and migration to SEPA of 22 July 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 10. septembra 2009 – Dokončanje enotnega območja plačil v evrih: načrt za obdobje 2009-2012 (KOM(2009)471),
– having regard to the Communication from the Commission of 10 September 2009: Completing SEPA: a Roadmap for 2009-2012 (COM(2009)471),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe (ES) št. 924/2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 16. septembra 2009 o čezmejnih plačilih v Skupnosti in razveljavitvi Uredbe (ES) št. 2560/2001 UL L 266, 9.10.2009, str.
– having regard to Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on cross-border payments in the Community and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2560/2001 OJ L 266, 9.10.2009, p.
– ob upoštevanju delovnega dokumenta Komisije z dne 30. oktobra 2009: Uporaba člena 81 Pogodbe ES pri večstranskih medbančnih plačilih v enotnem območju plačil v eurih ( SEC(2009)1472 ),
– having regard to the Working Document of the Commission of 30 October 2009: Applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to multilateral interbank-payments in SEPA Direct Debit ( SEC(2009)1472 ),
– ob upoštevanju drugega letnega poročila Komisije o napredku pri prehodu na enotno območje plačil v eurih v letu 2009 z dne 9. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the Commission’s second annual Progress Report on the State of SEPA Migration in 2009 of 9 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov Sveta z dne 2. decembra 2009 o enotnem območju plačil v eurih,
– having regard to the Council conclusions of 2 December 2009 on SEPA,
A. ker je enotno območje plačil v eurih (območje SEPA) zamišljeno kot integriran trg za plačilne storitve, na katerem vlada učinkovita konkurenca in na katerem ni razlike med čezmejnimi in nacionalnimi plačili v eurih,
A. whereas the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA) is to be an integrated market for payment services, which is subject to effective competition and in which there is no distinction between cross-border and national payments in euros,
B. ker območje SEPA ni le samoregulativna pobuda Evropskega sveta za plačila, ampak tudi pomembna javna politična pobuda za krepitev ekonomske in monetarne unije ter prihodnje strategije EU 2020; ker je območje SEPA podprto z direktivo o plačilnih storitvah, s čimer je zagotovljen potreben usklajen pravni okvir; ker zato uspeh območja SEPA vzbuja posebno pozornost Parlamenta;
B. whereas SEPA should be not only a self-regulatory initiative by the European Payments Council (EPC), but also a major public policy initiative reinforcing the Economic and Monetary Union and the future EU 2020 Strategy; whereas SEPA is supported by the Payment Services Directive, which provides the necessary harmonised legal framework; and whereas the success of SEPA is, therefore, a matter of particular interest to Parliament,
C. ker je proces sprejemanja odločitev v območju SEPA sedaj v pristojnosti Evropskega sveta za plačila, v katerem samo banke sprejemajo odločitve glede proizvodov SEPA, ne da bi upoštevale zahteve končnih uporabnikov,
C. whereas the SEPA decision-making process is currently at the discretion of the European Payments Council (EPC), where only banks take decisions on SEPA products neglecting end-users’ requests,
D. ker se je prehod na območje SEPA uradno začel 28. januarja 2008 z uvedbo plačilnega instrumenta SEPA za nakazila, medtem ko je okvir SEPA za uporabo kartic v veljavi od 1. januarja 2008, sistem SEPA za neposredne bremenitve pa se je začel uporabljati 2. novembra 2009,
D. whereas SEPA officially started on 28 January 2008 with the launch of the SEPA payment instrument for credit transfer (SCT), while the SEPA Cards Framework has been in force since 1 January 2008, and the SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) scheme started on 2 November 2009,
E. ker so potrošniki izrazili zaskrbljenost, da morajo lastnosti proizvodov SEPA zadovoljiti dejanske potrebe končnih uporabnikov, zlasti kar zadeva preverjanje pooblastil za neposredne bremenitve, in ker je zaželeno, da se doseže napredek pri reševanju tega vprašanja,
E. whereas consumers have expressed concern that the features of SEPA products should meet existing end-users’ needs, notably in relation to the checking of mandates for direct debits, and whereas it is desirable that progress is made towards addressing this issue,
F. ker ni bil določen pravno zavezujoč rok za prehod na instrumente SEPA in ker je velika večina, ki se je odzvala na javno posvetovanje Komisije, podprla zamisel o določitvi roka, da bi se spodbudil prehod na enotno območje plačil v eurih,
F. whereas no legally binding end-date for migration to SEPA instruments has been set, and whereas a large majority responding to a public consultation by the Commission supported the idea of setting such an end-date to stimulate SEPA migration,
G. ker je kandidat za komisarja za notranji trg in storitve v svojih pisnih odgovorih na vprašalnik Parlamenta izjavil, da je Komisiji nameraval predlagati sprejetje zakonodajne pobude, ki bi določila enega ali več rokov za prehod na proizvode SEPA za neposredne bremenitve in bančna nakazila, in pobudo za boljše upravljanje,
G. whereas the Commissioner-designate for the Internal Market and Services stated in his written answers to Parliament’s questionnaire that he intended to propose a legislative initiative for adoption by the Commission with the objective of setting one or more deadlines for migration to SEPA products for direct debits and credit transfers, as well as an initiative to improve governance,
H. ker je prehod na območje SEPA počasen – v avgustu 2009 je bilo opravljenih samo 4,5 % vseh transakcij v obliki nakazil SEPA – in ker je postal rok, prvotno predviden za prehod kritične mase za sistem bančnih nakazil, sistem za neposredno bremenitev in plačila s kartico do konca leta 2010, nerealističen,
H. whereas migration to SEPA has been sluggish: in August 2009, only 4.5 % of total transactions had been made by way of the SEPA Credit Transfer format, and whereas the deadline originally foreseen, namely the migration of a critical mass for SCT, SDD and card payments by end-2010, has become unrealistic,
I. ker javne uprave v večini držav članic pri prehodu na instrumente SEPA zaostajajo za pričakovanji, čeprav bi morali imeti ti organi vlogo katalizatorja pri zagotavljanju kritične mase, potrebne za pospešitev prehoda na območje SEPA,
I. whereas migration to SEPA instruments by public administrations is lagging behind expectations in most Member States, though these bodies should play a catalytic role in creating the critical mass needed to accelerate migration towards SEPA,
J. ker je pomembno, da pri uresničevanju območja SEPA sodelujejo vse zainteresirane strani: zakonodajalci, bančna industrija in uporabniki plačilnih storitev,
J. whereas it is important that all relevant stakeholders – legislators, the banking industry and payment services users – are involved in the achievement of SEPA,
K. ker uporaba instrumentov SEPA zgolj za čezmejne plačilne transakcije projektu SEPA ne bi prinesla uspeha, saj bi se ohranila razdrobljenost, pričakovane koristi bančne industrije ter njenih strank pa ne bi bile uresničene,
K. whereas the use of SEPA instruments merely for cross-border payment transactions would not result in the success of the SEPA project, as fragmentation would persist and anticipated benefits for the banking industry as well as for its customers could not be realised,
L. ker Uredba (ES) št. 924/2009 zagotavlja pravno varnost pri uporabi večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo v prehodnem obdobju do 31. oktobra 2012, v katerem mora industrija oblikovati in se sporazumeti o skupnem, dolgoročnem poslovnem modelu za delovanje sistema SEPA za neposredne bremenitve, ki mora biti v skladu z zakonodajo ES o konkurenci in regulativnim okvirom Skupnosti,
L. whereas Regulation (EC) No 924/2009 provides for legal certainty as regards the application of multilateral interchange fees (MIF) during a transitional period until 31 October 2012, in which industry should develop and agree a common, long-term business model for the operation of the SEPA Direct Debit which should be in line with EC competition law and the Community regulatory framework,
M. ker sta Komisija in Evropska centralna banka marca 2009 naznanili, da se zdi, da ni jasnega in prepričljivega razloga za obstoj večstranskih pristojbin za izmenjavo po 31. oktobru 2012, in ker je Komisija organizirala javno posvetovanje o uporabi člena 81 Pogodbe ES pri večstranskih medbančnih plačilih v enotnem območju plačil v eurih,
M. whereas in March 2009, the Commission and the European Central Bank indicated that there appeared to be no clear and convincing reason for a per transaction MIF to exist after 31 October 2012, and whereas the Commission conducted a public consultation on the applicability of Article 81 of the EC Treaty to multilateral interbank-payments in SEPA Direct Debit,
N. ker bi bilo treba prav tako rešiti uporabo večstranske pristojbine za izmenjavo nedvomno v zvezi z rešitvijo kartice EU na podlagi okvira SEPA za uporabo kartic,
N. whereas the application of a MIF should also be resolved definitely with regard to an EU card solution based on the SEPA Cards Framework,
1. poudarja, da še naprej podpira vzpostavitev območja SEPA, kjer vlada učinkovita konkurenca in na katerem ni razlike med čezmejnimi in nacionalnimi plačili v eurih;
Emphasises its continued support for the creation of SEPA, which is subject to effective competition and in which there is no distinction between cross-border and national payments in euros;
4. ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj določi jasen, ustrezen in zavezujoč rok za prehod na proizvode SEPA, ki se lahko določi za najkasneje 31. december 2012, po tem datumu pa bi morala biti vsa plačila v eurih izvedena po standardih SEPA;
Calls again on the Commission to set a clear, appropriate and binding end-date, which should be no later than 31 December 2012, for migrating to SEPA instruments, after which all payments in euros must be made using the SEPA standards;
3.3.2010 B7-0133/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0000/2010 – O-0025/2010
3.3.2010 B7-0133/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0000/2010 – O-0025/2010
o davkih na finančne transakcije – izvajanje v praksi
on financial transaction taxes – making them work
PE432.992v01-00 B7‑0133/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o davkih na finančne transakcije – izvajanje v praksi
PE432.992v01-00 B7‑0133/2010 European Parliament resolution on financial transaction taxes – making them work
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 24. aprila 2009 o vrhunskem srečanju skupine G 20 2. aprila 2009 v Londonu Sprejeta besedila , P6_TA(2009)0330 .
– having regard to its resolution of 24 April 2009 on the London G20 Summit of 2 April 2009 Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0330 .
– ob upoštevanju izjave voditeljev, podane po vrhunskem srečanju skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu,
– having regard to the Leaders' Statement issued following the Pittsburgh Group of Twenty (G20) Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009,
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 8. oktobra 2009 o vrhunskem srečanju skupine G20 24. in 25. septembra 2009 v Pittsburghu Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2009)0028 .
– having regard to its resolution of 8 October 2009 on the Pittsburgh G20 Summit of 24 and 25 September 2009 Texts adopted, P7_TA(2009)0028 .
– ob upoštevanju sporočila s srečanja finančnih ministrov in guvernerjev centralnih bank skupine G20 7. novembra 2009,
– having regard to the communiqué of the St Andrews G20 meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors of 7 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju sklepov z zasedanja Evropskega sveta 10. in 11. decembra 2009, zlasti odstavka 15,
– having regard to the Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 10-11 December 2009, and in particular paragraph 15 thereof,
– ob upoštevanju izjave predsednika Barrosa, ki jo je 15. decembra 2009 podal Evropskemu parlamentu,
– having regard to President Barroso's statement of 15 December 2009 to the European Parliament,
– ob upoštevanju pisma švedskega finančnega ministra predsedstvu sveta z dne 18. januarja 2010 o uvedbi pristojbine za stabilnost v državah članicah,
– having regard to the letter of 18 January 2010 from the Swedish Finance Minister to the Presidency of the Council on the introduction of a stability fee in the Member States,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive Sveta 2008/7/ES z dne 12. februarja 2008 o posrednih davkih na zbiranje kapitala UL L 46, 21.2.2008, str.
– having regard to Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital OJ L 46, 21.2.2008, p.
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije za direktivo o spremembi Direktive 2006/112/ES o skupnem sistemu davka na dodano vrednost v zvezi z obravnavo zavarovalnih in finančnih storitev (KOM(2007)747),
– having regard to the Commission proposal for a directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services (COM(2007)747),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja Komisiji z dne 24. februarja 2010 o davkih na finančne transakcije – izvajanje v praksi ( O-0025/2010 – B7‑0000/2010),
– having regard to the question of 24 February 2010 to the Commission on financial transaction taxes – making them work ( O-0025/2010 – B7‑0000/2010),
A. ker je Parlament pozdravil raziskovalno delo, vpeljano na ravni G20 po vrhunskem srečanju v Pittsburghu septembra 2009 in usmerjeno proti mednarodnemu okviru za obdavčitev finančnih transakcij,
A. whereas Parliament has welcomed the investigative work initiated at G20 level, following the Pittsburgh Summit in September 2009 towards an international framework for financial transaction taxation,
B. ker je Parlament zahteval hiter napredek, s čimer bi se zagotovilo, da tudi finančni sektor prispeva svoj del h gospodarskemu okrevanju in razvoju, saj je sedaj precejšen delež stroškov in posledic finančne krize na ramenih realnega gospodarstva, davkoplačevalcev, potrošnikov, javnih storitev in družbe na splošno,
B. whereas Parliament has called for speedy progress to ensure that the financial sector contributes fairly towards economic recovery and development since substantial costs and consequences of the financial crisis are being borne by the real economy, taxpayers, consumers, public services and society in general,