natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da so precejšnje razlike v dodelitvah tako med državami članicami kot med cilji; poudarja, da vseh področij ni mogoče urejati z enako politiko in da bi tovrstno ravnanje privedlo do slabše pripadnosti in poistovetenja s katero koli strategijo za rast, pa tudi izvajanje takšne strategije bi bilo posledično pomanjkljivo;
Notes that the allocations vary significantly across Member States and among Objectives; stresses that there is no one-size-fits-all policy for all areas and that such an attempt would lead to a lack of ownership and identification with any strategy for growth and result in its poor implementation;
opozarja, da je bila kljub odsotnosti mehanizma za namensko dodeljevanje povezava med programi kohezijske politike in lizbonsko strategijo že v obdobju 2000–2006 zelo močna, saj je bilo v raziskave in inovacije vloženih 10,2 milijarde EUR;
Recalls that already in the 2000-2006 period, despite the absence of an earmarking mechanism, the link between cohesion policy programmes and the Lisbon Strategy was strong with €10.2 billion invested in research and innovation;
meni, da izvirna lizbonska strategija, ki temelji le na odprti metodi usklajevanja, strukturno ni mogla izpolniti ciljev, navedenih v njej, resnični rezultati pa so bili doseženi šele, ko je bila povezana s kohezijsko politiko; poudarja, da se je treba pri strategiji EU2020 tej napaki izogniti;
Takes the view that the original Lisbon Strategy, based solely on the open method of coordination, was structurally unable to obtain its stated goals and that it was only when it was linked to the Cohesion policy that true results were reached; stresses that this error should be avoided in the proposed EU2020 strategy;
obžaluje, da zaradi poznejšega začetka programov in posledičnega pomanjkanja podatkov o porabi trenutno ni mogoče preveriti, ali dejanski izdatki ustrezajo dodeljenim programskim sredstvom, in tudi ne oceniti ustreznosti lizbonskih naložb, zlasti glede načrtovanja v manj naprednih državah; pozdravlja objavo strateškega poročila Komisije in poziva, naj se na podlagi poročila izvede medinstitucionalna razprava na visoki ravni, da se analizira prispevek kohezijske politike k doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in ocenijo prihodnje medsebojne povezave;
Regrets that due to the delayed start-up of the programmes and the subsequent lack of data on expenditure, the correspondence between programme allocations and actual expenditure cannot be verified at this stage, nor is it possible to assess the soundness of the Lisbon investments, particularly as regards programming in less advanced countries; welcomes the publication of the Commission's strategic report and asks that a high level inter-institutional debate is carried out on this basis to analyse the contribution of the cohesion policy to the Lisbon objectives and to assess the future interrelations;
kritično ocenjuje pomanjkanje splošne ocene učinka kohezijskih izdatkov na regionalni razvoj; poziva Komisijo, naj oceni ozemeljski učinek dodelitve strukturnih skladov za lizbonsko strategijo, in oceni, ali sistem dejansko prispeva k uravnoteženemu in usklajenemu regionalnemu razvoju;
Criticises the lack of an overall assessment of the impact of cohesion expenditure on regional development; calls upon the Commission to assess the territorial impact of earmarking Structural Funds to the Lisbon Strategy and to evaluate whether this system is actually contributing to balanced and coherent regional development;
priznava, da mora učinkovito ocenjevanje temeljiti na kazalnikih, ki omogočajo primerjavo in povezovanje podatkov po regijah; poziva Komisijo, naj predlog za kazalnike za ocenjevanje pripravi pred letom 2012, da se zagotovi način za merjenje doseženega učinka (tudi glede količine in kakovosti) in za potrebne popravke za naslednje programsko obdobje;
Recognises that an effective evaluation must be based on indicators allowing data comparison and aggregation among regions; urges the Commission to come up with a proposal for evaluation indicators before 2012 in order to provide the means to measure the impact produced, also as regards quantity and quality, and to make the necessary adjustments for the next programming period;
obžaluje, da je prenovljena strategija iz leta 2005 prinesla manj ambiciozen program, čeprav so cilji lizbonske agende v začetku vključevali tako gospodarsko rast kot zaposlovanje in družbeno kohezijo;
Regrets that, while the main objectives of the Lisbon Agenda initially included economic growth, employment and social cohesion, the re-launch of the Strategy in 2005 presented a less ambitious programme;
meni, da je ena od glavnih omejitev lizbonske strategije šibko upravljanje na več ravneh, ki se kaže v nezadostni vključitvi regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter civilne družbe v zasnovo, izvajanje in ocenjevanje strategije ter obveščanje o njej; priporoča, da se ti akterji v prihodnje vključijo v večji meri;
Considers weak multi-level governance one of the main limits of the Lisbon Strategy, with the insufficient involvement of regional and local authorities and civil society in the design, implementation, communication and evaluation of the strategy; recommends their stronger integration in the future at all stages;
poudarja, da je vključitev načela partnerstva v lizbonsko strategijo privedla do močnejšega občutka zavezanosti ciljem strategije pri lokalnih in regionalnih organih oblasti, pa tudi pri zainteresiranih skupinah z gospodarskega in socialnega področja, ter zagotovila večjo trajnost njihovih ukrepov; poziva Komisijo, naj bolj učinkovito spremlja izvajanje načela partnerstva v državah članicah;
Highlights that when the partnership principle has been applied in the Lisbon Strategy, it has increased the sense of ownership of the objectives by the local and regional authorities, as well as by the economic and social stakeholders, and ensured higher sustainability of the interventions; calls on the Commission to monitor the implementation of the partnership principle in the Member States more effectively;
opozarja, da imajo evropske regije in mesta temeljno vlogo pri izvajanju lizbonske strategije, saj so ključni akterji politik na področju inovacij, raziskav in izobraževanja; poudarja, da izvajajo več kot eno tretjino vseh javnih naložb v EU in porabo strukturnih skladov vedno bolj usmerjajo v cilje, povezane z rastjo in delovnimi mesti;
Notes that Europe's regions and cities play a fundamental part in implementing the Lisbon Strategy, being key players in the field of innovation, research and education policy; points out that they implement more than one third of all public investment in the EU and are increasingly focusing Structural Fund spending on growth- and job-related objectives;
poudarja, da imata zlasti regionalna in lokalna raven ključno vlogo pri vzpostavljanju stika s številnimi gospodarskimi in družbenimi akterji, ki živijo in delujejo v Evropi, zlasti malimi in srednjimi podjetji (MSP), ter pri spodbujanju izobraževanja in poklicnega usposabljanja, raziskav, inovacij in razvoja;
Points out that the regional and local level in particular has a crucial role to play as the vehicle to reach the countless economic and social actors living and producing in Europe, especially SMEs, and to foster education and vocational training, research, innovation and development;
obžaluje borne sinergije, ki so bile dosežene med nacionalnimi strateškimi referenčnimi okviri in nacionalnimi programi reform v okviru strategije; priporoča močnejši in reden dialog med upravami, ki so odgovorne za kohezijsko politiko in lizbonsko strategijo/strategijo EU2020, in tematsko ustreznimi partnerji iz nadzornega odbora na vseh ravneh, vključno z ravnjo Skupnosti;
Regrets the weak synergies that existed between National Strategic Reference Frameworks and the National Reform Programmes under the strategy; recommends a stronger and regular dialogue at all levels, including the Community level, between administrations responsible for the cohesion policy and the Lisbon/EU2020 Strategies and the relevant partners from the monitoring committee;
pozdravlja rezultate, ki so bili doslej doseženi z instrumenti finančnega inženirstva, in sodelovanje z Evropsko investicijsko banko pri spodbujanju inovacij in raziskav z obnovljivimi oblikami financiranja ter poudarja, da je treba okrepiti povezave med finančnimi instrumenti EU in finančnimi instrumenti EIB; priznava njihovo zmožnost doseči učinek vzvoda pri naložbah in poziva k njihovi okrepitvi, zlasti kar zadeva instrumenta JEREMIE in JESSICA, da se zagotovi boljša podpora gospodarskim družbam in MSP; priporoča poenostavitev pravil za upravljanje teh instrumentov, da bi jih upravičenci lahko izkoriščali v večji meri;
Appreciates the results produced so far through the financial engineering instruments and the cooperation with the EIB in fostering innovation and research through renewable forms of funding and stresses the need to strengthen the links between EU financing instruments and EIB financing instruments; recognises their leverage potential for investments and asks for their strengthening especially as regards JEREMIE and JESSICA to ensure better support to business and SMEs; recommends that the rules governing these instruments be simplified to allow their greater use by beneficiaries;
Kohezijska politika in EU2010
Cohesion policy and EU2020
pozdravlja razpravo o strategiji EU2020; poudarja dolgoročnost strategije, katere cilj je ustvariti okvirne pogoje za stabilno rast in ustvarjanje delovnih mest v Evropi ter prehod v trajnostno gospodarstvo, in se strinja z opredeljenimi prednostnimi nalogami; poudarja, da je treba nato razviti pristop upravljanja na več ravneh za ozemeljsko kohezijo, ki jo Evropa močno potrebuje;
Welcomes the debate on the EU2020 strategy; stresses the long-term nature of this strategy that aims to create framework conditions for stable growth and jobs creation in Europe and a transition to a sustainable economy, and agrees with the identified priorities; stresses that there is a need to subsequently develop a multilevel governance approach to the territorial cohesion so much needed in Europe;
obžaluje, da je bila ta strategija predlagana pred koncem revizije veljavne lizbonske strategije; močno priporoča Komisiji, naj pripravi odkrito oceno pomanjkljivosti pri izvajanju lizbonske strategije; poudarja, da bi bilo treba priporočila iz tega parlamentarnega poročila vključiti v končno različico nove strategije;
Regrets that this strategy has been proposed before the completion of the review of the current Lisbon Strategy; strongly recommends the Commission to prepare a forthright evaluation of the shortcomings in the Lisbon strategy implementation; stresses that the recommendations of this parliamentary report should be included in the final version of the new strategy;
poziva, da je treba zagotoviti učinkovito in obsežno infrastrukturo, in sicer s posodobitvijo prometnih sistemov, z uvedbo ureditev prevoza, ki ne povzroča onesnaževanja, izboljšanjem dostopa do pitne vode, kanalizacijskih sistemov in sistemov ravnanja z odpadki, z uvedbo učinkovitejšega upravljanja okolja ter z zagotavljanjem trajnostne uporabe naravnih virov in obnovljivih virov energije za gospodarski razvoj in boljšo socialno kohezijo;
Calls for the need to ensure an efficient and extensive infrastructure by modernising transport systems, introducing non-polluting transport arrangements, improving access to drinking water and drainage and waste management systems, introducing more effective environmental management, and ensuring the sustainable use of natural resources and renewable energies, with a view to economic development and improved cohesion;
poziva EU, naj sprejme posebne določbe in se ustrezno odzove na potrebe regij, za katere so značilne hude in stalne naravne ali demografske ovire, kot so obalne regije, otoki, gorate, čezmejne in najbolj oddaljene regije, ob upoštevanju pravne podlage za ozemeljsko kohezijo, določene z novo Lizbonsko pogodbo;
Urges the EU to adopt specific provisions and take appropriate action to meet the special needs of regions characterised by natural or demographic handicaps of a serious and permanent nature, such as coastal regions, islands, mountain regions, cross-border and outermost regions, in the light of the legal basis for territorial cohesion that the new Lisbon Treaty provides;
pozdravlja, da je bila v predlogu upoštevana socialna razsežnost, vendar poudarja, da ima gospodarski steber osrednjo vlogo v smislu ustvarjanja delovnih mest in je zato ključno, da se vzpostavi svoboden, odprt in funkcionalen notranji trg, ki podjetjem omogoča prilagodljiv odziv na makroekonomske trende; poudarja, da je nedavna kriza pokazala, da strategija za rast nikakor ne sme zanemarjati ciljev socialne zaščite, dostopa do storitev, boja proti revščini in socialni izključenosti ter ustvarjanja kakovostnih delovnih mest;
Appreciates that the social dimension is taken into account in the proposal, but stresses that the economic pillar has the central role in terms of job creation and therefore it is vital to complete the free, open and functional Internal Market enabling businesses to react with flexibility to macro-economic trends; stresses that the recent crisis has demonstrated that no strategy for growth can neglect the objectives of social protection, access to services, the fight against poverty and social exclusion and the creation of quality jobs;
pozdravlja poziv za več trajnostnih in pametnih delovnih mest, vendar priznava, da bi lahko nov gospodarski model privedel do neenake porazdelitve stroškov in koristi med posameznimi državami članicami in regijami, zato za preprečitev tega poziva Unijo, naj prevzame odgovornost in opredeli ključna področja ukrepanja, na katerih je v skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti ukrep na evropski ravni najustreznejši za doseganje najboljših rezultatov za vse;
Welcomes the call for more sustainable, smart jobs, but acknowledges that a new economic model might lead to an uneven distribution of costs and benefits among individual Member States and regions, and thus in order to prevent this happening, calls on the Union to take responsibility and identify key areas of action where, according to the principle of subsidiarity, European level intervention is the most appropriate to achieve the best results for all;
poudarja, da so raziskave in inovacije ključni instrumenti za razvoj EU in lahko povečajo njeno konkurenčnost glede na globalne izzive; meni, da ta področja potrebujejo redne naložbe in redno ocenjevanje napredka na podlagi doseženih rezultatov; v zvezi s tem poziva k boljšemu usklajevanju strukturnih skladov in okvirnega programa, da se čim bolj povečajo koristi financiranja za raziskave in razvoj v prihodnosti ter za razvoj regionalnih inovativnih grozdov v državah članicah in med njimi;
Stresses that research and innovation are key instruments for the development of the EU and can make it more competitive in the face of global challenges; is of the opinion that there must be regular investment in these fields as well as a regular assessment of the progress made on the basis of the results achieved; calls in this regard for a better coordination of the Structural Funds and the Framework Programme to maximise the benefits of the funding for research and innovation in the future and for the development of regional innovative clusters within and between Member States;
je prepričan, da sta izobraževanje in usposabljanje temeljna pogoja za razvoj EU in lahko povečata njeno konkurenčnost glede na globalne izzive; meni, da je treba redno zagotavljati naložbe na tem področju in redno ocenjevati napredek pri dosežkih;
Is convinced that education and training are the fundamental preconditions for the development of the EU and can make it more competitive in the face of global challenges; believes that investment has to be regularly ensured in this domain and that progress on achievements must be regularly assessed;
priznava, da se je vzpostavljena struktura ciljev v strukturni politiki v svojem prvem letu izkazala za uspešno; zaradi zanesljivosti načrtovanja poziva k ohranitvi te strukture in načela deljenega upravljanja; priznava, da je za prilagoditev ciljem strategije EU2020 lahko potrebna prilagoditev objektivne vsebine;
Acknowledges that the established structure of objectives in the structural policies has proven a success during its first years; calls for the sake of planning reliability for the perpetuation of this structure as well as for the perpetuation of the principle of shared management; acknowledges that an adjustment of the objective contents might be necessary for an adaption to the 2020 goals;
ugotavlja, da se infrastrukturne pomanjkljivosti, zlasti v podeželskih regijah, po Evropi še vedno precej razlikujejo, kar ovira izrabo njenega potenciala rasti in nemoteno delovanje notranjega trga; v zvezi s tem poudarja pomen čezmejnega sodelovanja in meni, da je treba vzpostaviti resnično enake pogoje na področju prometne, energetske in telekomunikacijske infrastrukture ter infrastrukture informacijske tehnologije, kar je treba vključiti tudi v strategijo in mora še naprej ostati osrednji del kohezijske politike;
Notes that infrastructural deficiencies, particularly in rural regions, still vary considerably across Europe, blocking its growth potential and the smooth functioning of the Internal Market; stresses the importance of cross-border cooperation in this respect and believes that a true level playing field in transport, energy, telecommunications and IT infrastructure needs to be created, should be included in the strategy and continue to be a vital part of the cohesion policy;
meni, da mora imeti proračun EU osrednjo vlogo pri doseganju ciljev strategije EU2020; meni, da je kohezijska politika zaradi svoje strateške usmerjenosti, trdnega in zavezujočega pogojevanja, prilagojenih ukrepov ter spremljanja in tehnične pomoči uspešen in učinkovit mehanizem za izvajanje strategije EU2020;
Recognises that the EU Budget must play a central role in achieving the EU 2020 targets; considers that cohesion policy due to its strategic focus, strong and binding conditionality, tailor-made interventions, and monitoring and technical assistance, is an efficient and effective mechanism for EU2020 strategy delivery;
ugotavlja, da zlasti glede širokopasovnega dostopa obstajajo veliki zaostanki na podeželju, ki jih je treba odpraviti v skladu s ciljem iz evropskega programa za digitalne tehnologije, da se podpre trajnostni gospodarski razvoj teh regij;
Notes that, particularly with regard to access to broadband, major deficits exist in rural areas, which must be overcome, in accordance with the objective stated in the Digital Agenda, in order to support the sustainable economic development of these regions;
pozdravlja priznanje vloge strukturnih skladov pri uresničevanju ciljev EU2020; vendar poudarja, da kohezijska politika ni zgolj vir stabilnih finančnih sredstev, temveč tudi močan instrument za gospodarski razvoj vse evropskih regij.
Welcomes the recognition of the role of the Structural Funds in the delivery of the EU2020 goals; stresses, however, that the cohesion policy is not just the source of stable financial allocations but is also a powerful instrument for the economic development of all of Europe's regions.
poudarja, da mora biti ključni element strategije EU2020 močna in dobro financirana kohezijska politika, ki bo zajemala vse evropske regije; meni, da je ta politika s svojim horizontalnim pristopom predpogoj za uspešno uresničevanje ciljev EU2020, pa tudi za doseganje družbene, gospodarske in ozemeljske kohezije v EU; zavrača vse poskuse ponovne nacionalizacije kohezijske politike in zahteva, naj se v pregledu proračuna EU v celoti podpre regionalna razsežnost te politike;
Emphasises that a strong and well-financed cohesion policy, embracing all European regions, must be a key element of the EU2020 Strategy; believes that this policy, with its horizontal approach, is a pre-condition for the successful delivery of the EU2020 goals, as well as for achieving social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU; rejects all attempts to renationalise the cohesion policy and asks for the regional dimension to be fully supported in the review of the EU budget;
poudarja, da je pravočasna opredelitev mehanizmov za izvajanje ključnega pomena za uspeh strategije EU2020;
Stresses that the timely definition of delivery mechanisms is of pivotal importance for the success of the EU 2020 Strategy;
opozarja, da kohezijska politika ni podrejena strategiji EU2020; izpostavlja, da morajo biti prednostne naloge kohezijske politike sicer usklajene s cilji EU2020, vendar je treba omogočiti tudi zadostno mero prožnosti za prilagoditev regionalnim posebnostim ter podporo šibkejšim in najrevnejšim regijam pri reševanju socialno-ekonomskih težav, preseganju naravnih ovir in zmanjševanju razlik;
Stresses that the cohesion policy is not subordinated to the EU2020 Strategy; highlights that whilst the cohesion policy's priorities should be aligned with the EU2020 objectives, sufficient flexibility should be allowed to accommodate regional specificities and support the weaker and neediest regions to overcome their socio-economic difficulties, natural handicaps and reduce disparities;
poziva, naj se v strategiji EU2020 v primerjavi z lizbonsko strategijo izboljša sistem upravljanja; priporoča, da se ga ob siceršnji uporabi sredstev iz kohezijskega sklada in strukturnih skladov zasnuje in izvaja skladno z načelom upravljanja na več ravneh, da se zagotovi večja vključenost lokalnih in regionalnih organov oblasti ter zainteresiranih skupin civilne družbe; poudarja, da bi ta udeležba lahko vključevala sprejetje sporazumov o upravljanju na več ravneh;
Asks for an improved governance system in the EU2020 Strategy compared to the Lisbon Strategy; recommends its design and implementation, while using Cohesion and structural funds, according to the multi-level governance principle so as to ensure the greater involvement of local and regional authorities and civil society stakeholders; stresses that this involvement could include the adoption of multi-level governance agreements;
meni, da mora strategija EU2020 prispevati k uresničevanju ozemeljske kohezije, ki je kot nov cilj vključena v Lizbonsko pogodbo; meni, da lokalne pobude za čezmejno sodelovanje nudijo možnost za ozemeljsko kohezijo, ki do zdaj še ni bila dovolj izkoriščena; poziva Komisijo, naj v svojih predlogih za ureditev prihodnjega teritorialnega sodelovanja podrobneje določi vlogo strategij makroregij;
Considers that the EU2020 strategy must be an integral part in the achievement of the goal of territorial cohesion, included as a new objective in the Lisbon Treaty; believes that local initiatives for cross-border cooperation offer a potential for territorial cohesion which has as yet not been sufficiently exploited; invites the Commission to set out the role of the macro-regions strategies in greater detail in its proposals for the future territorial cooperation arrangements;
poudarja, da bo močnejša ozemeljska razsežnost strategije ob upoštevanju posebnosti in različnih razvojnih ravni evropskih regij in z neposredno vključitvijo regionalnih in lokalnih organov oblasti ter partnerjev, kot je navedeno v uredbi o strukturnih skladih, v načrtovanje in izvajanje ustreznih programov privedla do močnejšega občutka zavezanosti ciljem na vseh ravneh in zagotovila boljše zavedanje ciljev in dosežkov na terenu; meni tudi, da je treba regije stalno podpirati z razvojem inovativnih finančnih instrumentov, da se lahko ohrani njihova vloga pri doseganju ciljev lizbonske strategije;
Points out that a stronger territorial dimension of the strategy, considering the specificities and different development levels of the European regions, with the direct involvement of regional and local authorities and partners as referred to in the Regulation on the Structural Funds in the planning and implementation of the relevant programmes, will lead to a greater sense of ownership of its goals at all levels and ensure a better awareness of objectives and outputs on the ground; believes, in addition, that the regions need to be continuously supported by developing innovative financial instruments so that their role in achieving the objectives of the Lisbon Strategy can be maintained;