natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
L . ker Direktiva 2001/29/ES zagotavlja usklajen pravni okvir o avtorskih in sorodnih pravicah ter strog in učinkovit sistem za njihovo varstvo; ker so v členu 5 direktive izčrpno naštete vse izjeme in omejitve, kar države članice omejuje, da bi uvajale nove izjeme in omejitve; ker je namen sporazuma ACTA povečati raven varstva nosilcev pravic, saj zagotavlja obsežnejše pristojnosti za uveljavljanje avtorskih pravic, vendar ne obravnava možnosti širjenja obstoječih izjem in omejitev ter lahko omeji diskrecijsko pravico nacionalnih sodišč do prožne razlage obstoječih izjem; ker so se s tehnološkim napredkom povečale možnosti za ustvarjanje, izdelavo in izkoriščanje ustvarjalnih del ter postale bolj raznolike, za vzpostavitev poštenega ravnovesja med interesi nosilcev pravic in uporabnikov pa so potrebni novi pristopi k liberalizaciji dostopa do teh del z uporabo digitalne tehnologije; ker Komisija pripravlja zakonodajni predlog za dela, za katera imetniki avtorskih pravic niso znani, da se omogoči digitalizacija in širjenje kulturnih del v Evropi,
L . whereas the Directive 2001/29/EC provides for a harmonised legal framework on copyright and related rights and a rigorous, effective system for their protection; whereas Article 5 of the Directive presents an exhaustive enumeration of exceptions and limitations, thereby limiting Member States from providing new exceptions and limitations; whereas ACTA seeks to further extend the level of protection for right holders by catering for more extensive copyright enforcement competencies, but does not address the possibility of expanding existing exceptions and limitations and may constrain discretion of national courts to flexibly interpret existing exceptions; whereas technological advances have multiplied and diversified the vectors for creation, production and exploitation of creative works and a fair balance of interests between right holders and users requires new approaches to liberalising access to these works through digital technologies; whereas the Commission is preparing a legislative proposal on orphan works to facilitate the digitisation and dissemination of culture works in Europe,
M. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima EU v zvezi z zakonodajo o zasebnosti, svobodi izražanja in varstvu podatkov, kakor je določeno zlasti v Direktivi 95/46/ES, Direktivi 2002/58/ES ter sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
M. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection law, as notably set forth in Directive 95/46/EC, in Directive 2002/58/EC and in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
N. ker so se pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA zavezale k ohranitvi obveznosti iz člena 7 sporazuma TRIPS, da bi prispevale k spodbujanju tehnoloških inovacij; ker se temeljne politike EU v zvezi z medobratovalnostjo opirajo na določbe pravnega reda Skupnosti, ki v nekaterih primerih dopuščajo obratno inženirstvo,
N. whereas ACTA parties have committed to upholding obligations under Article 7 of the TRIPS Agreement to contribute to the promotion of technological innovation; whereas fundamental EU policies related to interoperability rely on provisions in the acquis communautaire which permit in some cases reverse engineering,
O. ker je med plenarnim zasedanjem 20. oktobra 2010 komisar za trgovino Parlament povabil, da izrazi svoje stališče o odprtem vprašanju, ali naj se področje patentov vključi v poglavja o civilnopravnem uveljavljanju; ker po mnenju pogajalcev sporazum ACTA ne bo oviral čezmejnega tranzita zakonitih generičnih zdravil; ker je Parlament v svoji resoluciji in pisni izjavi izrazil, da noben ukrep za krepitev pristojnosti čezmejnega nadzora in zaseg blaga ne sme ogrožati globalnega dostopa do zakonitih, cenovno sprejemljivih in varnih zdravil; ker Uredba Sveta (ES) št. 1383/2003 določa ukrepe za obmejni nadzor blaga v tranzitu, določbe te uredbe pa se obravnavajo v sporu Svetovne trgovinske organizacije; ker nekateri akterji, kot so podjetja v farmacevtskem sektorju, proizvajalci generičnih zdravil in zagovorniki svetovnega zdravja, svarijo pred vključitvijo patentov v sporazum ACTA in opozarjajo, da bi to lahko imelo škodljive učinke na tehnološke inovacije, dostop do zdravil in konkurenco generičnih zdravil,
O. whereas the Trade Commissioner invited the opinion of the Parliament during the 20 October 2010 plenary on the outstanding issue of whether to include patents in the Civil Enforcement sections; whereas ACTA negotiators have asserted that "ACTA will not hinder the cross-border transit of legitimate generic medicines"; whereas Parliament in its resolution and written declaration has declared that any measure aimed at strengthening powers of cross-border inspection and seizure of goods should not harm global access to legal, affordable and safe medicines; whereas EU Council Regulation 1383/2003, the provisions of which are being discussed in a WTO dispute case, provides border enforcement measures for in-transit goods; whereas some actors such as businesses in the pharmaceutical sector, manufacturers of generic medicines and global health advocates alert against the inclusion of patents in ACTA and warn of potential detrimental effects on technological innovation, access to medicine and generic competition,
P. ker ni zakonodaje EU o patentih,
P. whereas there is no EU legislation on patents,
Q. ker se z bojem proti namerni kršitvi blagovne znamke v trgovinskem obsegu ne sme spodkopati trgovanja zakonitih, kakovostnih generičnih zdravil; ker lahko uporaba ukrepov za civilnopravno uveljavljanje iz sporazuma ACTA pri patentih ogrozi dostop do zakonitih cenovno sprejemljivih zdravil; trdi, da bodo izrazita povišanja odškodnin in drugih pravnih sredstev za morebitne kršitve intelektualne lastnine odvrnila proizvajalce in tretje osebe, ki sodelujejo pri proizvodnji, prodaji ali distribuciji cenovno sprejemljivih generičnih zdravil, zlasti če bodo veljala za blago v tranzitu; je zaskrbljen, da lahko uporaba določb o civilnopravnem uveljavljanju iz sporazuma ACTA pri patentih nasprotuje javnemu interesu ter lahko poveča naložbena tveganja in tržno negotovost ter ogrozi tehnološke inovacije, zlasti v sektorjih, kjer se kršitve težko določijo, ali za uveljavljanje patentov za žive organizme, domače proizvode in tradicionalna zdravila; zato meni, da bi morala Komisija podpreti jasno in popolno izključitev patentov s področja uporabe poglavja o civilnopravnem uveljavljanju iz tega sporazuma,
Q. whereas the trade of legitimated quality generic medicines must not be undermined by the fight against willful trademark infringement on commercial scale; whereas the application of civil enforcement measures in ACTA to patents could hamper access to legal, affordable medicines; asserts that marked increases in damages and in other remedies for possible IP violations will deter manufacturers and third parties involved in the production, sale or distribution of affordable generic medicines, particularly if these provisions are applied to in-transit goods; is concerned that applying civil enforcement provisions to patents in ACTA could go against the public interest, and may increase investment risk, market uncertainty and threaten technological innovation, particularly in sectors where infringement is difficult to determine, or in enforcing patents on living things, indigenous products and traditional medicines; is therefore of the opinion that the Commission support the explicit and absolute exclusion of patents from the scope of the Civil Enforcement section of the agreement,
R. ker so nekatere pomembne trgovinske partnerice, ki trenutno niso pogodbenice sporazuma ACTA (na primer Brazilija, Indija in Kitajska), v svetu STO TRIPS izjavile, da bi lahko bil sporazum ACTA v navzkrižju s sporazumom TRIPS in drugimi sporazumi STO, ter bi lahko predstavljal tveganje za zakonodajo in proces STO, saj deluje izven njenega pravnega okvira, spodkopal ravnovesje pravic, dolžnosti in prožnosti, ki so bile skrbno izpogajane v različnih sporazumih STO, izkrivljal trgovino ali ustvaril trgovinske ovire ter spodkopal prožnosti, vključene v sporazum TRIPS ter Deklaracijo iz Dohe o sporazumu TRIPS in javnem zdravju iz leta 2001, za področja kot je javno zdravje in trgovina generičnih zdravil,
R. whereas some important trading partners not currently parties to ACTA (e.g. Brazil, India, China) have asserted at the WTO TRIPS Council that ACTA may conflict with the TRIPS Agreement and other WTO agreements, pose a risk to WTO law and process by operating outside the WTO legal framework, undermine the balance of rights, obligations and flexibilities that were carefully negotiated in various WTO agreements, distort trade or create trade barriers, and undermine flexibilities built into TRIPS and the Doha declaration on TRIPS and public health of 2001, such as for public health and trade in generic medicines,
Temeljne pravice
Fundamental r ights
S. ker je Komisija v svojem sporočilu z dne 19. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da mora Unija na področju temeljnih pravic delovati brezhibno in da mora biti v zvezi s tem za zgled; ker je Komisija na plenarnem zasedanju 20. oktobra 2010 izjavila, da sporazum ACTA še ni parafiran in da ima Komisija kot pogajalec pristojnost, da določi, na kateri stopnji so pogajanja tehnično zaključena in se sporazum lahko parafira,
S. whereas the Commission stated in its Communication on 19 October 2010 that the "Union’s action must be above reproach when it comes to fundamental rights" and that the "Union must be exemplary in this respect"; whereas the Commission stated in Plenary on 20 October 2010 that ACTA "is not yet initialled" and that "it is the Commission’s prerogative, as a negotiator, to determine the point at which negotiations are technically finalised and at which the agreement can be initialled",
T. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima EU v zvezi z zakonodajo o zasebnosti, svobodi izražanja in varstvu podatkov, kakor je določeno zlasti v Direktivi 95/46/ES, Direktivi 2002/58/ES (nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009), Direktivi 2009/136/ES in Direktivi 2009/140/ES o elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežjih in storitvah ter sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
T. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy and data protection law, as notably set forth in Directive 95/46/EC, in Directive 2002/58/EC (as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009), in Directive 2009/136/EC and Directive 2009/140/EC on Electronic communications networks and services, and in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
U. ker je Komisija zavezana k medinstitucionalnemu sporazumu iz leta 2010 in zato ne bi smela podpirati samoregulativnih ali koregulativnih mehanizmov, ko gre za temeljne pravice, kot je pravica do svobodnega izražanja,
U. whereas the Commission is bound by the 2010 Inter-Institutional Agreement and therefore shall not support self- and co-regulatory mechanisms where fundamental rights, such as the right to freedom of expression, are at stake,
V. ker je komisija 19. oktobra 2010 izdala sporočilo o oceni učinka,
V. whereas the Commission issued a communication on impact assessment on 19 October 2010,
Trgovinski obseg
Commercial s cale
W. ker je v členu 2.14.1 sporazuma ACTA opredeljen trgovinski obseg: „za namene tega poglavja, med dejanja, izvedena v trgovinskem obsegu spadajo vsaj tista dejanja, ki so bila izvedena kot trgovinske dejavnosti za neposredno ekonomsko ali komercialno korist“,
W. whereas ACTA article 2.14.1 contains a definition of commercial scale: " For the purpose of this section, acts carried out on a commercial scale include at least those carried out as commercial activities for direct economic or commercial advantage",
X. ker je v opombi 9 v sporazumu navedeno: „Vsaka pogodbenica mora nameren uvoz ali izvoz blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk ali piratskega blaga v trgovinskem obsegu obravnavati kot nezakonito dejavnost, za katero so zagrožene kazenske sankcije iz tega člena.
X. whereas ACTA footnote 9 says: "Each Party shall treat wilful importation or exportation of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a commercial scale as unlawful activities subject to criminal penalties under this Article.
Pogodbenica lahko svoje dolžnosti v zvezi z izvozom in uvozom piratskega blaga ali blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk izpolni tako, da distribucijo, prodajo ali ponudbo za prodajo blaga ponarejenih blagovnih znamk ali piratskega blaga v trgovinskem obsegu opredeli kot nezakonite dejavnosti, za katere so zagrožene kazenske sankcije“,
A Party may comply with its obligation relating to exportation and importation of pirated copyright or counterfeit trademark goods by providing for distribution, sale or offer for sale of counterfeit trademark goods or pirated copyright goods on a commercial scale as unlawful activities subject to criminal penalties",
Y. ker poglavje sporazuma ACTA o kazenskopravnem pregonu obravnava določbe o kazenskih postopkih, kazenski odgovornosti, kaznivih dejanjih, kazenskopravnem pregonu in kaznih; ker se je o določbah v zvezi s kazenskopravnim pregonom v sporazumu ACTA pogajalo predsedstvo Sveta v imenu držav članic,
Y. whereas the Criminal Enforcement section of ACTA concerns provisions on criminal procedures, criminal liability, criminal offenses, criminal enforcement and penalties; whereas the Presidency of the Council has negotiated the criminal enforcement provisions in ACTA on behalf of Member States,
Z. ker meni, da glede na Direktivo o elektronskem poslovanju in pisno izjavo 0012/2010 ponudniki internetnih storitev za podatke, ki jih prenašajo ali gostijo s pomočjo svojih storitev, ne bi smeli nositi take odgovornosti, da bi morali te podatke pred prenosom nadzirati ali filtrirati; ker Evropski nadzornik za varstvo podatkov v svojem mnenju opozarja, da utegnejo ponudniki internetnih storitev v pogodbe s svojimi strankami vključiti klavzule o spremljanju njihovih podatkov in ukinitvi njihovih naročnin,
Z. whereas the e-commerce directive and written declaration 0012/2010 takes the view that internet service providers should not bear liability for the data they transmit or host through their services to an extent that would necessitate prior surveillance or filtering of such data; whereas EDPS' opinion on ACTA warns that internet service providers (ISPs) might insert "clauses in their customer's contracts allowing the monitoring of their data and the cutting of their subscriptions",
AA. ker člen 1.2 sporazuma določa, da vsaka pogodbenica svobodno določi ustrezno metodo za izvajanje določb tega sporazuma v skladu s svojim pravnim sistemom in prakso,
AA. whereas Article 1.2 of the agreement states that “Each Party shall be free to determine the appropriate method of implementing the provisions of this Agreement within its own legal system and practice.",
BB. ker nacionalni sodni organi obravnavajo kršitve intelektualne lastnine v digitalnem okolju,
BB. whereas the infringement of IPRs in the digital environment is dealt by the national judicial authorities,
CC. ker je odbor ACTA v skladu z institucionalno ureditvijo iz sporazuma ACTA med drugim pristojen za uveljavljanje, izvajanje in spreminjanje sporazuma ter za nevladno sodelovanje in odločitve o poslovniku odbora; ker Unijo v skladu s členom 21 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropski unije vodi tudi spodbujanje demokracije,
CC. whereas the Institutional Arrangements in ACTA confer the ACTA Committee with authority related to, inter alia, the implementation and operation of the Agreement, the amending of the Agreement, non-governmental participation and decisions regarding the Committee's rules and procedures; whereas Article 21 TFEU guides the Union to seek the advancement of democracy,
5. meni, da trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju, celo v zadnji javno objavljeni konsolidirani različici, še vedno resno ogroža državljanske svoboščine in temeljne pravice, razvoj in dostop do generičnih zdravil in da Komisija EP še zdaleč ne posreduje potrebnih odgovorov na izražene pomisleke;
Considers that ACTA, even in the version of the last consolidated text made public continues to be a serious threat against civil liberties and fundamental rights, for development and for access to generic medicines, and that the Commission is far from providing to the EP the necessary answers to the concerns raised;
8. se seznanja s ponovljenimi izjavami Komisije, da je uveljavljanje določb trgovinskega sporazuma proti ponarejanju – zlasti tistih o postopkih uveljavljanja avtorskih pravic v digitalnem okolju – popolnoma v skladu z zakonodajo Skupnosti in da sporazum ne bo uvedel osebnih pregledov ali t.i. postopka treh opominov.
Takes note of the Commission's repeated statements that the enforcement of ACTA provisions – especially those on copyright enforcement procedures in the digital environment – are fully in line with the acquis communautaire and that neither personal searches nor the so-called 'three strikes' procedure will be introduced by this agreement.
Vsaka podpisnica trgovinskega sporazuma proti ponarejanju in zlasti EU morda ne bo imela pristojnosti, da na podlagi sporazuma predloži tri opomine ali podobne režime;
Any ACTA signatory and in particular the EU may not be mandated to introduce three strikes or similar regimes by the agreement;
16. naroča Komisiji, naj Parlamentu pred parafiranjem sporazuma predloži pravno analizo pomena, zakonitosti in izvršljivosti želenih politik iz sporazuma ACTA v zvezi s sodelovanjem med ponudniki storitev in imetniki pravic, zlasti glede tega, v kakšni meri prizadevanja za sodelovanje v poslovnem svetu ne bodo omejevala temeljnih pravic državljanov, vključno s pravico do zasebnosti, pravico do svobode izražanja in pravico do zakonitega pravnega postopka;
Instructs the Commission to present to Parliament, -before initialling the Agreement-, a legal analysis of the meaning, legality and enforceability of ACTA's desired policies regarding cooperation between service providers and right holders, particularly in reference to how cooperative efforts within the business community will not limit fundamental rights of citizens, including the right to privacy, the right to freedom of expression and the right to due process;
Pogoji EP za odobritev
EP's conditions to the c onsent
18.11.2010 B7-0622/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0564/2010
18.11.2010 B7-0622/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0564/2010
o razmerah v čebelarstvu
on the situation in the beekeeping sector
, ki vsebuje posebne določbe za sektor čebelarstva,
, which lays out special provisions for the apiculture sector in the European Union,
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije z dne 28. maja 2010 o uporabi člena 105 in naslednjih Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1234/2007, ki se nanašajo na ukrepe za izboljšanje pogojev za proizvodnjo in trženje čebelarskih proizvodov ( KOM(2010)0267 ),
– having regard to the Commission report of 28 May 2010 on the implementation of Articles 105 et seq. of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 on measures improving the general conditions for the production and marketing of apiculture products (COM (2010)0267),
– ob upoštevanju znanstvenega poročila EFSA z dne 11. avgusta 2008 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/154r.pdf
– having regard to the EFSA scientific report of 11 August 2008 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/doc/154r.pdf
in znanstvenega poročila, katerega naročnica je bila EFSA in ga je sprejela 3. decembra 2009 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/27e.htm
, as well as the scientific report commissioned and adopted by EFSA on 3 December 2009 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/27e.htm
, ki obe obravnavata umrljivost in nadzor čebel v Evropi,
, both of them on Bee Mortality and Bee Surveillance in Europe,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja za ustni odgovor ( O–119/2010 – B7–0564/2010 ) z dne 1. septembra 2010 o razmerah v čebelarstvu,
– having regard to Oral Question ( O-119/2010 – B7-0564/2010 ) of 1 September 2010 on the situation in the beekeeping sector,
– ob upoštevanju členov 115(5) in 110(2) svojega poslovnika,
– having regard to the Rules 115(5) and 110(2) of its Rules of Procedure,
A. ker vseh 27 držav članic EU v povprečju uporablja 90 % nacionalnih programov za evropsko čebelarstvo, ki so jih oblikovale države članice za dobo treh let; ker Komisija v omenjenem poročilu z dne 28. maja 2010 navaja, da so nacionalni čebelarski programi v zadnjih letih prinesli pozitivne rezultate,
A. whereas the national programmes for the European beekeeping sector, drawn up by Member States for a period of three years, have been used by all 27 EU Member States, with an average usage rate of 90%; whereas the Commission stated, in its abovementioned report of 28 May 2010, that the national beekeeping programmes have been beneficial over recent years,
B. ker se je treba ravno v mednarodnem letu biotske raznovrstnosti zavedati, da je čebelarstvo po vsem svetu zelo ogroženo, saj ima izgube, ki so 100 do 1000-krat večje kot običajno; ker ima čebelarstvo glede na javni in okoljski prispevek čebelarjev strateško vlogo v družbi, saj nazorno predstavlja primer okolju prijazne dejavnosti (izboljšanje in ohranjanje biotske raznovrstnosti, vzdrževanje ekološkega ravnotežja in ohranjanje rastlinstva) in modela trajnostnega pridelovanja v podeželskem okolju,
B. whereas in 2010, the European Year of Biodiversity, the beekeeping sector throughout the world is gravely threatened, registering losses 100 to 1 000 times worse than normal; whereas the sector plays a strategic role in society, providing a public service of environmental value, and whereas beekeeping is a valuable example of a ‘green occupation’ (improving and preserving biodiversity and the ecological balance and conserving plant life) and a model of sustainable production in a rural environment,
C. ker se bodo veljavni programi končali leta 2013; ker je sedanja podpora EU čebelarskemu sektorju odvisna od obstoječih modalitet Skupne kmetijske politike; ker morajo čebelarji načrtovati za obdobje po letu 2013; ker namerava Komisija do novembra 2010 objaviti svoje sporočilo o prihodnji skupni kmetijski politiki,
C. whereas the current programmes come to an end in 2013; whereas the current EU support for the beekeeping sector depends on existing modalities of the CAP; whereas operators need to plan for the time after 2013; whereas the Commission intends to publish its Communication on the future CAP by November 2010,
D. ker se v kmetijstvu zelo zavzemajo, da bi ohranili čebele kot opraševalke, ker je Organizacija za prehrano in kmetijstvo opozorila mednarodno skupnost na zaskrbljujoč upad števila žuželk opraševalk, vključno s čebelami delavkami; ker je gospodarski pomen čebel veliko večji od vrednosti medu, ki ga proizvedejo, saj je 84 % rastlinskih vrst in 76 % proizvodnje hrane v Evropi odvisnih od čebeljega opraševanja,
D. whereas agriculture has a major interest in maintaining bees as pollinators; whereas the FAO has alerted the international community to the alarming reduction in numbers of pollinating insects, including honey bees; whereas 84% of the plant species and 76% of food production in Europe are dependent on pollination by bees, the economic importance of which is much greater than the value of the honey produced,