natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
F. ker je sedma ministrska konferenca WTO, ki je potekala v od 30. novembra do 2. decembra 2009 Ženevi, poudarila velik pomen trgovine in pogajalskega kroga iz Dohe za gospodarsko okrevanje in zmanjševanje revščine v državah v razvoju,
F. whereas the Seventh WTO Ministerial Conference, which took place in Geneva from 30 November to 2 December 2009, underlined the great importance of trade and the Doha Round for economic recovery and poverty alleviation in developing countries,
G. ker je bilo 1. decembra 2009 na delovni seji sedme ministrske konference prvič po uveljavitvi Lizbonske pogodbe v Svetovni trgovinski organizaciji uporabljeno ime Evropska unija,
G. whereas the name ‘European Union’ was used for the first time in the WTO in the 1 December 2009 working session at the Seventh Ministerial Conference, following the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon,
2. meni, da so v sedanji gospodarski krizi pravila in zaveze WTO članicam v veliki meri omogočile, da jim ni bilo treba poseči po ukrepih za omejevanje trgovine, hkrati pa tudi prožnost pri sprejemanju ukrepov za okrevanje gospodarstva;
Takes the view that, in the current economic crisis, WTO rules and commitments have to a great extent prevented Members from having recourse to trade-restrictive measures, while allowing for flexibility in adopting economic recovery measures;
Razvojna agenda iz Dohe
DDA (Doha Development Agenda)
7. poziva države z gospodarstvi v vzponu, naj prevzamejo odgovornost kot svetovni gospodarski akterji ter se prilagajajo v skladu s svojo ravnjo razvoja in (sektorske) konkurenčnosti; poudarja pomen trgovine sever–jug in jug–jug;
Urges the emerging economies to assume their responsibility as global economic players and to make concessions commensurate with their level of development and (sectoral) competitiveness; emphasises the importance of North-South, as well as South-South, trade;
14. poziva k intenzivnejšim pogovorom na področju storitev, da bi dosegli večjo liberalizacijo storitev na splošno ter hkrati ohranili nacionalne politične cilje članic WTO ter njihovo pravico do urejanja javnih storitev;
Calls for an intensification of talks in the area of services with a view to further liberalisation of services in general, while preserving WTO Members’ national policy objectives and their right to regulate public services;
Reforma Svetovne trgovinske organizacije
Reform of the WTO
16. meni, da mora WTO bolje obravnavati povezave med trgovino in novimi globalnimi izzivi, kot so podnebne spremembe, zanesljivost in neodvisnost preskrbe s hrano in dostojne razmere za delo;
Believes that the WTO needs to address more effectively the links between trade and new global challenges such as climate change, food security and sovereignty, and decent working conditions;
19. poziva Komisijo, naj se pri potekajočih pogajanjih tesno poveže s Parlamentom; zato opozarja na potrebo po ponovnih pogajanjih o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, da bi odražal določbe o trgovini iz Lizbonske pogodbe, v skladu s katerimi za evropsko trgovinsko politiko velja strožji demokratični nadzor; glede na Lizbonsko pogodbo namerava revidirati medinstitucionalni sporazum, da se vzpostavi polno sodelovanje Parlamenta pri mednarodnih trgovinskih pogajanjih EU ter da se zagotovi zlasti:
Urges the Commission to associate Parliament closely in the ongoing negotiations; points out, therefore, the need to renegotiate the Interinstitutional Treaty in order to reflect the trade provisions of the Lisbon Treaty whereby European trade policy must be subject to more rigorous democratic scrutiny; intends, in the light of the Lisbon Treaty, to revise the Interinstitutional Agreement (IIA) in order to establish full participation by Parliament in the EU’s international trade negotiations, ensuring in particular:
(a) da bo Parlament obveščen o izbrani pravni podlagi pred začetkom pogajanj;
(a) that Parliament is informed, before the negotiations open, of the chosen legal basis,
(b) da Svet v primeru uradne zahteve Parlamenta ne dovoli začetka pogajanj, dokler Parlament na podlagi poročila pristojnega odbora ne sprejme stališča o predlaganem pogajalskem mandatu,
(b) that, in the event of a formal request from Parliament, the Council will agree not to authorise the opening of negotiations until Parliament has stated its position on the proposed negotiating mandate on the basis of a report from the committee responsible,
(c) da je Parlament redno, pravočasno in v celoti obveščen o poteku vseh dvostranskih in večstranskih trgovinskih pogajanj,
(c) that Parliament is provided with regular, full and timely information over the course of all bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations,
16.12.2009 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 115(5) poslovnika,
16.12.2009 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 115(5) of the Rules of Procedure
PE432.812v01-00 } PE432.815v01-00 } PE432.819v01-00 } PE432.820v01-00 } RC1 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001
PE432.812v01-00 } PE432.815v01-00 } PE432.819v01-00 } PE432.820v01-00 } RC1 European Parliament resolution on improvements needed to the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001
– ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU), Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU), Listine Unije o temeljnih pravicah ter njihovih določb, ki so začele veljati 1. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the articles thereof which entered into force on 1 December 2009,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanj Komisiji in Svetu z dne 9. novembra 2009 o potrebnem izboljšanju pravnega okvira o dostopu do dokumentov po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, uredba (ES) št. 1049/2001 ( O–0123/2009 – B7–0231/2009 , O–0122/2009 – B7–0230/2009 ), ter razprave na plenarnem zasedanju 15. decembra 2009,
– having regard to the questions of 9 November 2009 to the Commission and Council on the improvement needed in the legal framework for access to documents following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 ( O-0123/2009 - B7 0231/2009, O-0122/2009 - B7-0230/2009 ) and to the debate in plenary on 15 December 2009,
A. ker Unija „posameznika postavlja v središče svojih dejavnosti z vzpostavitvijo državljanstva Unije in oblikovanjem območja svobode, varnosti in pravice“ (preambula Listine o temeljnih pravicah) in ker ima „vsak državljan Unije in vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic [...] pravico dostopa do dokumentov institucij, organov, uradov in agencij Unije, ne glede na nosilec dokumenta“ (člen 42 Listine o temeljnih pravicah),
A. whereas the Union 'places the individual at the heart of its activities, by establishing the citizenship of the Union and by creating an area of freedom, security and justice' (Preamble to the Charter of Fundamental Rights), and whereas 'any citizen of the Union, and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State, has a right of access to documents of the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union, whatever their medium' (Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights),
C. ker bi moral ta odnos odslej temeljiti na demokratičnih načelih, očrtanih v novem naslovu II Pogodbe EU, kjer je navedeno, da „Unija [...] spoštuje načelo enakosti svojih državljanov, ki so deležni enake obravnave s strani njenih institucij“ (člen 9), ter da ima „vsak državljan [...] pravico sodelovati v demokratičnem življenju Unije.
C. whereas this relationship should from now on be framed by the democratic principles outlined in the new Title II of the TEU, which stipulates that 'the Union shall observe the principle of equality of its citizens, who shall receive equal attention from its institutions' (Article 9) and that 'every citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union.
D. ker je gonilo popolne integracije Evropske skupnosti v Evropsko unijo ter odprave medvladne ureditve, ki je vse doslej veljala na področju pravosodnega in policijskega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah, pripravljenost držav članic „okrepiti demokratično in učinkovito delovanje institucij“ (preambula PEU),
D. whereas the full integration of the European Community into the EU, as well as the abolition of the intergovernmental regime which still applied to judicial and police cooperation in criminal matters, was driven by the Member States' willingness 'to enhance further the democratic and efficient functioning of the institutions' (Preamble to the TEU),
E. ker morajo vse institucije, organi, uradi in agencije EU, ne le Parlament, Svet in Komisija (ki jih že zavezuje člen 255 predhodne Pogodbe ES), v skladu s tem novim pravnim okvirom odslej „pri svojem delu kar najbolj upoštevati načelo javnosti delovanja“ (člen 15(1) PDEU),
E. whereas, in keeping with this new legal framework, all the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies, and not just Parliament, the Council or the Commission (which were already bound by Article 255 of the former EC Treaty), are now required to conduct their work as openly as possible (Article 15(1) TFEU),
F. ker sta v skladu z novo Pogodbo EU in sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije Kot je zapisano v sodbi v zadevi Turco (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P), pomeni preglednost tesnejše sodelovanje državljanov v postopku odločanja in večjo zakonitost v upravi ter njeno učinkovitejše in odgovornejše ravnanje v razmerju do državljanov v demokratičnem sistemu.
F. whereas according to the new TEU and the case-law of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) As stated by the ECJ in the Turco judgment (Joined Cases C-39/05 P and C-52/05 P), 'openness (...) enables citizens to participate more closely in the decision-making process and guarantees that the administration enjoys greater legitimacy and is more effective and more accountable to the citizen in a democratic system'.
javnost delovanja in udeležba civilne družbe nujna pogoja za spodbujanje dobrega upravljanja institucij EU ter posledično učinkovitosti postopka odločanja,
openness and the participation of civil society are essential conditions for promoting good governance of the EU institutions and with it 'the effectiveness of (the) decision-making process',
G. ker imajo državljani v skladu s temeljnimi načeli demokracije pravico poznati in spremljati postopek odločanja, ter ker bi morale institucije EU in predstavniki držav članic, kadar nastopajo kot člani Sveta pred zakonodajnim in nezakonodajnim postopkom odločanja, med njim in po njem, zagotoviti večjo preglednost, da bi državljanom EU in nacionalnim parlamentom omogočili celosten vpogled v to, kdo kaj počne in zakaj, ter spremljanje dejavnosti svojih predstavnikov,
G. whereas, in accordance with the basic principles of democracy, citizens have a right to know and to follow the decision-making process, and whereas enhanced transparency should be guaranteed by the EU Institutions and the Member States' representatives when acting as members of the Council before, during and after the legislative and non-legislative decision-making process in order to allow EU citizens and national parliaments to gain a comprehensive insight into who is doing what and why and to monitor the activities of their representatives,
I. ker Lizbonska pogodba zahteva nadaljnje izboljšave v preglednosti in javnem dostopu do dokumentov; ker so v sodni praksi Sodišča Evropske unije že razjasnjene nekatere določbe Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, ki jih je tako treba sedaj razlagati v smeri lažjega dostopa, kakor jih je razlagal tudi Parlament, ko je bila uredba sprejeta; ker Parlament ne bo sprejel nobenih zakonodajnih predlogov Komisije ali Sveta o zmanjševanju dostopa javnosti do dokumentov ali o krnjenju pravice državljanov do informiranosti,
I. whereas the Lisbon Treaty calls for further improvements to transparency and public access to documents; and whereas the case-law of the ECJ has already been most helpful in clarifying some of the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, so that these must now be interpreted in line with the access-friendly understanding of these provisions espoused by Parliament when the regulation was adopted; whereas Parliament will not allow any legislative attempts by the Commission or the Council to reduce public access to documents or roll back citizens' right to information,
K. ker je Sodišče Evropske unije potrdilo, da preglednost in dostop do informacij „omogoča[ta] javno razpravo o razhajanjih med različnimi mnenji ter daje[ta] institucijam večjo legitimnost v očeh evropskih državljanov in povečuje[ta] njihovo zaupanje.
K. whereas the ECJ has confirmed that openness and access to information 'contribute to conferring greater legitimacy on the institutions in the eyes of European citizens and increasing their confidence in them by allowing divergences between various points of view to be openly debated.
Pomanjkanje informacij in razprav lahko namreč pri državljanih vzbudi dvome o zakonitosti posameznega akta in legitimnosti celotnega postopka odločanja“ (združeni zadevi C-39/05 P in C-52/05 P, odstavek 59),
It is in fact rather a lack of information and debate which is capable of giving rise to doubts in the minds of citizens, not only as regards the lawfulness of an isolated act, but also as regards the legitimacy of the decision-making process as a whole' (Joined Cases C-39/05 and C-52/05, paragraph 59),
L. ker bi bilo treba sprejeti dolgo pričakovane pravne, finančne in operativne ukrepe, da bi zagotovili jasen in pravočasen dostop do vseh dokumentov, povezanih s posameznim zakonodajnim postopkom, najsi pripadajo notranjim službam ali zunanjim interesnim skupinam; ker bi lahko dostop do teh informacij omogočiti na medinstitucionalnem spletnem mestu, kjer bi bili povezani notranji registri institucij (kot je prenovljeno spletno mesto EUR-LEX, ki ga upravlja OPOCE); ker bi bilo treba ustrezno spremeniti notranja pravila, treba pa bi bilo tudi hitro skleniti zavezujoče medinstitucionalne sporazume na podlagi člena 295 PDEU,
L. whereas long-awaited legal, financial and operational measures should be taken in order to ensure that all the documents relating to a specific legislative procedure are made accessible in a clear and timely manner, whether they originate from internal services or from outside interest groups; whereas this information could be made available on an interinstitutional Internet site linking the institutions' internal registers (such as OPOCE's revamped EUR-LEX site); and whereas internal rules should be amended accordingly and binding interinstitutional agreements negotiated expeditiously on the basis of Article 295 TFEU,
M. ker v skladu s členoma 4 in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001 obstaja jasna razlika med dostopom do dokumentov ter informiranjem in udeležbo državljanov na eni strani ter komunikacijo med institucijami na drugi,
M. whereas, in accordance with Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, there is also a clear distinction between ‘access to documents’ and ‘information and participation of citizens’ on the one hand and interinstitutional communication on the other hand,
N. ker bi bilo treba jasno razlikovati med dostopom do dokumentov in informiranjem in udeležbo državljanov na eni strani ter nekaterimi oblikami komunikacije v institucijah, ki so opredeljene v notranjih pravilih institucij, na drugi,
N. whereas there should be a clear distinction between 'access to documents' and 'information and participation of citizens', on the one hand, and certain types of intra-institutional communication to be defined by the internal rules of the institutions, on the other,
O. ker nove pristojnosti Evropske unije, zlasti Evropskega parlamenta, na področjih, kot so mednarodni sporazumi o policijskem in pravosodnem sodelovanju v kazenskih zadevah, zahtevajo okrepitev pravnega okvira v zvezi s členoma 4 in 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001, tako da bo ustrezno zagotovljena varnost EU, hkrati pa bo Evropskemu parlamentu kot predstavniku evropskih državljanov omogočen popoln nadzor,
O. whereas the new powers of the European Union and, in particular, of the European Parliament in areas such as international agreements on police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters require a stronger legal framework to be laid down in Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 so that EU security can be properly safeguarded whilst at the same time granting full oversight to the European Parliament as the representative of European citizens,
P. ker je več držav članic EU že sprejelo svoj zakon o prostem dostopu do informacij ali splošna pravila o dostopu do informacij in dokumentov javnih institucij,
P. whereas several EU Member States have already adopted either 'freedom of information acts' or general rules governing access to the information and documents held by public institutions,
(b) spremenijo določbe, ki se nanašajo na zakonodajne in nezakonodajne postopke, v skladu z novimi opredelitvami v temeljnih pogodbah;
(b) amending the provisions dealing with legislative and non-legislative procedures in accordance with the new definitions contained in the Treaties;
(c) na podlagi nedavne sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije posodobijo pravila, ki urejajo zlasti ravnanje z notranjimi dokumenti, informacijami in podatki, da bi zagotovili širši dostop do mnenj pravnih služb, podanih v okviru postopka odločanja, dokumenti in informacijami, ki se nanašajo na delo predstavnikov držav članic v vlogi članov Sveta – vključno z vloženimi zakoni, predlogi in spremembami, zapisniki sej, njihovimi stališči in glasovanji v Svetu, tudi v delovnih skupinah in strokovnih skupinah – , dokumenti v zvezi z mednarodnimi sporazumi, varstvom osebnih podatkov in tržnimi interesi, vsebino registrov institucij itd.;
(c) updating, on the basis of recent ECJ case-law, the rules which deal in particular with the treatment of internal documents, information and data, to ensure wider access to Legal Service opinions drafted in the framework of the decision-making process, documents and information relating to the work of Member State representatives when acting as members of the Council - including the acts, proposals and amendments tabled, transcripts of meetings, their positions and votes cast in the Council, including in its working groups and expert groups - documents relating to international agreements, the protection of personal data and commercial interests, the content of the institutions' registers, etc.;
(d) odobri dostop do razpoložljivih informacij v institucijah EU, ki bo omogočil objektivno oceno izvajanja pravil, zakonov, ukrepov in programov EU v državah članicah; zagotovi večja finančna preglednost z zagotavljanjem podrobnih informacij o proračunu EU, njegovem izvajanju ter upravičenci do skladov in subvencij EU;
(d) granting access to the information available in the EU institutions which makes it possible to evaluate objectively the implementation of EU rules, acts, measures and programmes in the Member States; ensuring greater financial transparency by providing detailed information concerning the EU budget, its implementation and the beneficiaries of EU funds and grants;
(e) s preglednim postopkom ter ob doslednem upoštevanju demokratičnih načel in pravne države ter javnega in zasebnega interesa določijo splošna načela in omejitve v zvezi z dostopom do tajnih dokumentov, ki se jim izjemoma dodeli oznaka „strogo tajno“, „tajno“ ali „zaupno“ („Top Secret“, „Secret“ ali „Confidential“), da bi zaščitili najpomembnejše interese EU (člen 9 Uredbe (ES) št. 1049/2001);
(e) establishing, by means of a transparent procedure and in full compliance with democratic principles and the rule of law, the general principles and restrictions on grounds of public or private interest limiting access to documents which are exceptionally to be classified as 'Top Secret', 'Secret' or 'Confidential' in order to protect the EU's essential interests (Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001);
(f) opredelijo načela, ki bi jih lahko oblikovali z medinstitucionalnimi sporazumi v skladu s členom 295 Pogodbe o delovanju EU z namenom usklajenega izvajanja nove uredbe o boljši pripravi zakonodaje;
(f) defining the principles which could be developed by means of interinstitutional agreements under Article 295 TFEU with a view to implementing in a coordinated way the new regulation on better lawmaking;
(g) olajša dostop do dokumentov EU z vzpostavitvijo sistemov, ki bodo prijaznejši do uporabnikov;
(g) making EU documents more accessible by creating more user-friendly systems;
3. obžaluje, da kljub jasnim pozivom z dne 11. marca 2009:
Deplores the fact that, in spite of the clear requests it made on 11 March 2009:
– Komisija ni pripravila spremenjene različice svojega zakonodajnega predloga KOM(2008)0090 in je 2. decembra 2009, dan po začetku veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, odobrila sporočilo ( KOM(2009)0665 ), s katerim je zgolj posodobila pravno podlago prvotnega predloga brez vsebinskih sprememb;
– the Commission did not prepare a modified version of its legislative proposal COM(2008)0090 and, on 2 December 2009, following the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, approved a communication ( COM(2009)0665 ) which updated only the legal basis for the original proposal, avoiding any modification of its content;
4. poziva sedanje in prihodnje predsedstvo Sveta, naj nemudoma začne medinstitucionalni dialog na politični ravni z namenom najpozneje do 30. junija 2010 pripraviti novo ureditev dostopa do dokumentov;
Calls on the current and the incoming Council Presidencies to launch an immediate interinstitutional dialogue at political level with a view to drawing up the new regulation on access to documents by 30 June 2010 at the very latest;
(a) rednega organiziranja sestankov na politični ravni, prvič maja 2010, nato pa vsaj enkrat letno;
(a) holding regular meetings at political level, in the first instance in May 2010 and thereafter at least once a year;
(b) vzpostavitvi tehničnih delovnih skupin, ki jih sestavlja zlasti IT-osebje, da bi preučili možnost zbiranja povezav na spletna mesta, ki spodbujajo dostop državljanov do dokumentov na eni sami spletni strani, s čimer bi zagotovili komplementarnost javnih registrov institucij, sčasoma približali obstoječa iskalna orodja in izboljšali dostop do vseh dokumentov, povezanih s posameznim zakonodajnim dosjejem, tako da se na enem mestu zberejo vsi dokumenti treh institucij iz posameznega dosjeja;
(b) setting up technical working groups, comprising IT staff in particular, to examine the possibility of gathering the links to websites that promote citizens' access to documents on one single web page, ensuring the complementarity of the institutions' public registers, gradually approximating the existing search tools, and improving access to all documents linked to a specific legislative file by grouping together all documents of the three institutions belonging to that file;
16.12.2009 PREDLOG SKUPNE RESOLUCIJE v skladu s členom 122(5) poslovnika,
16.12.2009 JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION pursuant to Rule 122(5) of the Rules of Procedure
o Zahodni Sahari: primer Aminatou Haidar
on Western Sahara: the case of Aminatou Haidar
– ob upoštevanju resolucij varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov (št. 1204, 1215, 1282, 1292, 1495, 1541, 1570, 1589, 1754, 1783, 1813 in 1871) in zadnjega poročila visokega komisarja Združenih narodov za človekove pravice,
– having regard to United Nations Security Council resolutions 1204, 1215, 1282, 1292, 1495, 1541, 1570, 1589, 1754, 1783, 1813 and 1871 and to the latest report by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights,
– ob upoštevanju zadnjega poročila generalnega sekretarja varnostnemu svetu o Zahodni Sahari z dne 14. aprila 2008,
– having regard to the UN Secretary-General's latest report to the Security Council on Western Sahara (14 April 2008),