natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pozdravlja predlog Komisije o prednostnih projektih TEN-T; vendar ugotavlja, da sredstva, dodeljena za 30 prometnih prednostnih projektov in program Marco Polo, predstavljajo najmanjši znesek, ki mora biti podvržen reviziji navzgor; poudarja strateški pomen prometnih omrežij za končno konsolidacijo enotnega trga EU in zbližanje EU odnosov z državami kandidatkami, državami, ki so zaprosile za članstvo in državami, ki spadajo v "krog prijateljev"; opaža, da medsebojno povezovanje prometnih omrežij lahko krepi razvoj trgovine in naložb ter na ta način lahko spodbuja trajnost in stabilnost ter tudi socialno, gospodarsko in geografsko kohezijo; poziva k primernemu financiranju razvoja prometnih medsebojnih povezav in skupne infrastrukture, ki jo delijo države; vztraja, da bi moralo to financiranje biti pogojeno z jamstvi držav članic za primerno sofinanciranje z njihove strani in z ustreznim dostopom zadevnih regij do mreže, in je pripravljen preučiti inovativne finančne instrumente, kot so jamstva za posojila, evropske koncesije, evropsko najemanje posojil in sklad za financiranje obrestne mere, ki bi kril naložbe javnega in zasebnega sektorja samo v raziskave, inovacije, vesoljsko tehnologijo in glavna materialna ter nematerialna omrežja ali sredstva EIB;
Welcomes the Commission proposal on TEN-T priority projects; notes however that the resources allocated for 30 transport priority projects as well as for the Marco Polo programme constitute a minimum amount which must be regarded as subject to upward revision; underlines the strategic importance of transport networks for final consolidation of the EU single market and for closer EU relations with candidate, pre-candidate and 'ring of friends' countries; notes that the interconnection of transport networks can underpin the development of trade and investment, thereby promoting sustainability and stability as well as social, economic and geographical cohesion; calls for adequate funding for the development of transport interconnections and common infrastructure shared by the countries; insists that this funding should be conditional on guarantees by the Member States of adequate counterpart funding and adequate access to the network for the regions concerned, and is willing to examine innovative financing instruments such as loan guarantees, European concessions, European loans and an interest relief fund, to cover public and private-sector investment only in research, innovation, space and major physical and non-physical networks, or EIB facilities;
ugotavlja, da bi nova uredba omogočila tudi financiranje infrastrukture v programu TEN-E, kar ni bilo mogoče v prejšnjem okviru 2000-2006; meni, da bi se morala podpora tega programa osredotočiti predvsem na študije;
Notes that the new regulation would also allow financing infrastructure in the TEN-E programme, which was not the case in the previous framework 2000-2006; is of the opinion that studies should be the main focus of support under this programme;
Program socialne politike
The Social Policy Agenda
meni, da so skromna finančna sredstva, namenjena izvajanju programa socialne politike, najmanj, kar je potrebno, da se omogoči prispevanje k Lizbonski strategiji za trajnostni razvoj z več in boljšimi delovnimi mesti; meni, da ustrezna stopnja izdatkov Skupnosti na področju socialne politike ostaja ključna, zlasti glede zaposlovanja in socialnega varstva, vendar poudarja dejstvo, da je glavna odgovornost in pristojnost v zadevah socialne politike na strani držav članic; meni, da je potrebno povečanje v višini 200 milijard EUR, da bi izpolnili cilje programa socialne politike;
Considers that the modest financial means earmarked for the implementation of the Social Policy Agenda constitute the minimum needed to enable a contribution to be made to the Lisbon strategy for sustainable growth with more and better jobs; considers that an adequate level of Community expenditure in the social policy area remains crucial, in particular in terms of employment and social protection; stresses however that primary responsibility and competence in social policy matters lies with the Member States; believes that an increase of EUR 200 million is necessary in order to attain the goals of the Social Policy Agenda;
; meni, da je potrebno povečanje v višini 670 milijonov EUR, da bi izpolni cilje programa;
elcomes the consolidation into a single instrument; believes that an increase of EUR 670 million is necessary in order to attain its goals;
meni, da mora prestrukturiranje skupne kmetijske politike (SKP) spremljati znatno povečanje skladov za razvoj podeželja zaradi reševanja težav zaposlovanja in konkurenčnosti na podeželju, zlasti v novih državah članicah; meni, da naložbe v razvoj podeželja zahtevajo tudi povečano podporo podjetjem, ki spodbujajo diverzifikacijo podeželja; meni, da je predlog Komisije glede proračuna novega sklada za razvoj podeželja izredno omejen in zato predstavlja absolutno najnižji znesek;
Considers that the restructuring of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) needs to be accompanied by a substantial increase in rural development funds to address the problems of employment and competitiveness in rural areas, in particular in the new Member States; considers that investment in rural development also requires support for enterprises which promote diversification of the countryside; is of the opinion that the Commission's proposal for the budget of the new Rural Development Fund is extremely tight and therefore constitutes an absolute minimum;
pozdravlja pristop Komisije, da Natura 2000 vključi v sklad za razvoj podeželja in strukturne sklade, ki bi morali ob bistveno okrepljenem programu Life+ biti glavni viri finančnih sredstev; v zvezi s tem vztraja na pravno zavezujočem mehanizmu, ki zagotavlja pravilno izvajanje in financiranje Nature 2000 s strani EU na ravni ocenjenega prispevka EU k predvidenemu skupnemu znesku, ki znaša približno 6,1 milijard EUR na leto za EU-25; vztraja, da bi moral biti znesek 21 milijard EUR za Naturo 2000 namensko dodeljen ("označen") v finančni perspektivi 2007-2013 znotraj ustreznih področij; poziva k uvrstitvi financiranja ukrepov za izvajanje Nature 2000 v razdelku 2 finančne perspektive; poziva k financiranju dejavnosti in vodenja Nature 2000, ki jih ni mogoče financirati iz drugih instrumentov programa Life+; v zvezi s tem poziva Komisijo, da preuči morebitno vključitev Nature 2000 v druge sklade;
Welcomes the Commission's proposal that Natura 2000 be integrated into the Rural Development Fund and the structural funds which should be the main sources of financial resources alongside a significantly strengthened Life+ programme; insists in this context on a legally binding mechanism which guarantees proper implementation and EU funding for Natura 2000 at the level of the EU's estimated contribution to the envisaged overall amount, which is approximately EUR 6.1 billion for the EU-25 per year; insists that an amount of EUR 21 billion for Natura 2000 should therefore be earmarked ("ring-fenced") in the Financial Perspective within the respective areas; calls for the funding of measures to implement Natura 2000 under Heading 2 of the Financial Perspective; calls for the funding of Natura 2000 activities and management which cannot be financed by other instruments within the Life+ programme; calls on the Commission in this context to examine the possible integration of Natura 2000 in other funds;
Področje svobode, varnosti in pravice
An Area of Freedom, Security and Justice
opredeli dokončanje področja svobode, varnosti in pravice za eno od svojih političnih prednostnih nalog naslednjega finančnega okvira in ugotavlja, da je Komisija predlagala znatno povečanje sredstev, ki so mu dodeljena; meni, da predlagana dodelitev približno dveh tretjin sredstev, predvidenih v predlaganem razdelku 3, temu področju morda ne bo zadostna za kritje potreb in ambicij Evropske unije na tem področju, kot sta določila Evropski parlament in Svet; meni, da je potrebno povečanje v višini 1 milijarde EUR, da bi izpolnili cilje programa; poleg tega meni, da je treba pustiti zadostno rezervo v razdelku 3 za nepredvidene potrebe in nov razvoj;
Singles out the completion of the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice as one of its political priorities for the period of the next financial framework and notes that the Commission has proposed a substantial increase in the funds allocated to it; considers that the proposed allocation to this area of around two thirds of the funds provided for in the proposed Heading 3 may not be sufficient to cover the needs and the ambitions of the European Union in this area as defined by the European Parliament and the Council; believes that an increase of EUR 1 billion is necessary in order to attain its goals; moreover, believes that a sufficient margin must be left under Heading 3 to allow for unforeseen needs and new developments;
v luči prednosti, ki je dana boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu, vključno s terorizmom, in krepitvi pravosodnega sodelovanja, poziva k povečanju proračunskih sredstev za Europol in Eurojust; poziva tudi, naj ukrepe spremlja okrepljen demokratični nadzor nad Europolom;
In the light of the priority given to the fight against organised crime, including terrorism, and the strengthening of judicial cooperation, calls for a consolidation of the budgetary resources made available to Europol and Eurojust; calls, further, for that measure to be accompanied by a strengthening of the democratic scrutiny of Europol;
Evropa, bližja državljanu
A Europe closer to the citizen
Spodbujanje evropskega državljanstva, kulture in raznolikosti
Fostering European citizenship, culture and diversity
meni, da je program Mladi v akciji prednostna naloga; meni, da je sedanji program za mlade nazorno prikazal evropsko dodano vrednost ukrepov Skupnosti pri organiziranju večstranskih izmenjav mladih, Evropske prostovoljne službe, povezovanja projektov v mrežo in evropskega usposabljanja za mlade delavce; pozdravlja predlagano racionalizacijo instrumentov Skupnosti na tem področju; meni, da je potrebno povečanje sredstev z 811 na 1 000 milijonov EUR, da bi izpolni cilje programa;
Considers the Youth in Action Programme a priority; believes that the current Youth programme has clearly demonstrated the added European value of Community action in organising multilateral youth exchanges, a European voluntary service, the networking of projects, and European training for youth workers; welcomes the proposed rationalisation of Community instruments in this field; believes that an increase from EUR 811 million to EUR 1 000 million is necessary in order to attain its goals;
pozdravlja racionalizacijo instrumentov Skupnosti na področju kulture, predvidenih v predlogu Komisije za program "Kultura 2007" (KOM (2004)0469); obžaluje dejstvo, da se zdaj iz proračuna EU za umetnost porabi le 7 centov na državljana; meni, da je potrebno povečanje sredstev s 360 na 500 milijonov EUR, da bi izboljšali financiranje predloga Komisije;
Welcomes the rationalisation of Community instruments in the field of culture envisaged in the Commission's proposal for a Culture 2007 programme ( COM(2004)0469 ); deplores the fact that, at present, only 7 cents per head out of the EU budget is spent on the arts; believes that an increase from EUR 360 million to EUR 500 million is necessary to improve the financing of the Commission proposal;
je zaskrbljen, ker velika večina evropskih državljanov pravi, da o Evropski uniji, njenih institucijah, njenih politikah ali njenih dosežkih ve malo ali nič; poudarja, da mora Unija dati na razpolago zadostna sredstva za podporo učinkovite strategije obveščanja in komuniciranja, da bi tako pojasnila državljanom, kako delujejo obstoječe institucije, ki služijo državljanom, in zakaj sledijo nekaterim političnim ciljem; poziva k povečanju odvisnosti med finančno perspektivo in novimi določbami Ustave tudi glede participativne demokracije in zlasti razvoja civilnega dialoga ter izvajanja državljanske pobude; pozdravlja predložitev zakonodajnega predloga za program, ki bo nasledil program sodelovanja državljanov, ki ostaja prednostna naloga za spodbujanje dejavne in živahne civilne družbe ter približevanje Evrope državljanom s procesom "od spodaj navzgor";
Is concerned that a large majority of European citizens say that they know little or nothing about the European Union, its institutions, its policies, or its achievements; stresses that the Union must make available the means necessary to support an effective information and communication strategy to explain to citizens how the institutions which exist to serve them work and why they pursue the policy goals they do; calls for increased coherence between the financial perspectives and the new provisions of the Constitution, also with regard to participatory democracy and, in particular, to the development of civil dialogue and the implementation of citizens' initiatives; welcomes the submission of a legislative proposal for the successor programme to the Civic Participation Programme that remains a priority in order to promote an active and vibrant civil society and bring Europe closer to its citizens through a bottom-up process;
Močnejša Evropa v varnejšem in solidarnejšem svetu
A stronger Europe in a safer world of greater solidarity
vztraja na ravni financiranja zunanjih ukrepov, ki je zadostna, da omogoči EU postati pravi "globalni partner" v svetu in ji zagotovi sredstva za njene politične cilje in mednarodne obveznosti; poudarja, da ni pripravljen ohranjati stanja stalnega pritiska v razdelku 4, kot se je zgodilo v okviru sedanje finančne perspektive, in poudarja zlasti potrebo po visoki ravni prilagodljivosti in zadostni rezervi za nepredvidene dogodke; poudarja potrebo po zagotovitvi zadostnih finančnih sredstev za zagotovitev izvajanja pristopa, ki ga na tem področju določa Ustava, zlasti novo sosedsko politiko na osnovi posebnega partnerstva, predvidenega v členu I-57 Ustave;
Insists on a level of funding for external actions sufficient to enable the EU to become a real "global partner" in the world and to provide it with the means for its political ambitions and its international commitments; stresses its unwillingness to perpetuate a situation of constant pressure under Heading 4 as occurred under the current Financial Perspective and points particularly to the need for a high level of flexibility and sufficient margin to allow for unforeseen events; points out the need to provide sufficient funding to ensure the implementation of the approach indicated by the Constitution in this area, in particular the new Neighbourhood Policy on the basis of the special partnership provided for in Article I-57 thereof;
poudarja potrebo po nadaljnji diverzifikaciji evropske sosedske strategije, kar zagotavlja zanimivo možnost za tiste države, ki bi lahko postale članice Evropske unije, vendar bodo na koncu ostale tesne partnerice Unije; vztraja, da mora Evropski parlament, ki je del proračunskega organa, v prihodnje sodelovati kot enakovredni partner, kakršen je zdaj, pri vsakršni odločitvi v zvezi s prehodom potencialne kandidatke na predpristopno kandidatko, zaradi znatnih proračunskih posledic; meni, da je povečanje sredstev potrebno za poglobitev odnosov s sosednjimi državami in za zagotavljanje ustrezne ravni sredstev za možne države kandidatke in države kandidatke, kar jim zagotavlja pošteno in enako obravnavo; opozarja zlasti na dejstvo, da je treba sredstva, ki so na voljo za financiranje odnosov EU z državami v razvoju, razumeti kot najnižjo vrednost z vidika izpolnjevanja evropske zaveze za pomoč tem državam pri doseganju razvojnih ciljev tisočletja do leta 2015;
Underlines the need to further diversify the European Neighbourhood strategy providing also an attractive alternative for those countries which potentially could become Member States of the European Union but which will ultimately remain close partners of the Union; insists that the European Parliament, being part of the budgetary authority, must in the future be involved as an equal partner, as it is today, in any decision concerning the transition of a potential candidate to a pre-accession candidate, owing to the significant budgetary implications; is of the strong opinion that an increase of funds is necessary in order to deepen relations with its neighbouring countries and to provide an adequate level of funds for potential candidate and candidate countries that guarantees them fair and equal treatment; draws attention, in particular, to the fact that the resources available to fund EU relations with the developing countries must be considered as a minimum with a view to honouring the European commitment to help those countries achieve the Millennium Development Goals by 2015;
pozdravlja skorajšnjo ustanovitev Evropske službe za zunanjepolitično delovanje in vztraja, da njeni upravni stroški v celoti sodijo v okvir proračuna EU;
Welcomes the impending creation of the European External Action Service and insists that its administrative costs will fall in their entirety to the EU budget;
pozdravlja ponovno odločnost evropskega in ameriškega vodstva o oblikovanju skupnega programa, vključno s skupnimi ukrepi glede zunanjepolitičnih vprašanj; ugotavlja, da se ta pristop ne odraža v predlogu Komisije in vztraja, da bi moral Evropski parlament sodelovati pri odločanju o teh zadevah, ki imajo proračunske posledice;
Welcomes the renewed determination of the EU and the US leaderships with a view to shaping a common agenda, including joint actions on foreign policy issues; notes that this approach is not reflected in the Commission proposals and insists that the European Parliament should participate in decisions on these matters if they have budgetary implications;
Del II Organizacija in zgradba finančnega okvira
Part II Organisation and structure of the financial framework
ugotavlja, da je Komisija predlagala finančni okvir za sedemletno obdobje; zaradi demokratične odgovornosti ponovno poudarja svojo podporo vzporednosti med trajanjem finančne perspektive ter petletnima mandatoma Evropskega parlamenta in Komisije ter opozarja, da Ustava predvideva, da bo prihodnji večletni finančni okvir trajal najmanj pet let, kar bi omogočilo usklajevanje mandatov Komisije in Evropskega parlamenta; poudarja, da bi trajanje zakonodajnih predlogov lahko ostalo neodvisno od časovnega okvira finančne perspektive; zato zahteva od svoje delegacije, ki se pogaja o medinstitucionalnem sporazumu, da vztraja, da prihodnji medinstitucionalni sporazum vključuje določbe, ki zagotavljajo daljše (do sedemletno) trajanje večletnih programov, primerljivo s trajanjem prihodnje finančne perspektive, zlasti za glavne politike, kot so kmetijska politika, strukturna in kohezijska politika ter raziskave;
Notes that the Commission has proposed a financial framework of 7 years' duration; reiterates, for reasons of democratic responsibility and accountability, its position in favour of a parallelism between the duration of the Financial Perspective and the five-year mandates of the European Parliament and of the Commission, and recalls that the Constitution provides for a duration for the future MFF of a minimum of five years, which would allow for co-ordination with the terms of office of the Commission and of the European Parliament; points out that the duration of the legislative proposals could remain independent from the timeframe of the Financial Perspective; therefore requests its delegation negotiating the Interinstitutional Agreement to insist that the future Interinstitutional Agreement include provisions guaranteeing a longer (up to 7 years) duration for multi-annual programmes, compared to the duration of the future Financial Perspective, in particular for major policies such as agricultural policy, structural and cohesion policy and research;
podpira predlog Komisije za finančni okvir za sedemletno obdobje; meni, da bi bil krajši časovni okvir tehnično in politično neuporaben ter da bo daljša finančna perspektiva prispevala k stabilnosti sistema in olajšala načrtovanje kohezijske politike ter drugih finančnih instrumentov skupnega proračuna;
Supports the Commission's proposal for a financial framework of 7 years' duration; considers that a shorter time framework would be technically and politically impractical, and that a longer financial perspective will contribute to the stability of the system and facilitate the programming of the cohesion policy and of other financial instruments of the common budget;
upošteva predlog Komisije za preoblikovanje naslednjega finančnega okvira, da bi bolje odražal široke politične cilje, okrepil socialno in ekonomsko kohezijo, državljanom pa zagotovil večjo preglednost nad večletno porabo EU, vendar pa meni, da to v nekaterih primerih privede do nepotrebne okornosti;
Takes note of the Commission's proposal to restructure the next financial framework, with the aim of better reflecting the broad policy goals, strengthening social and economic cohesion and making the EU's multi-annual spending more visible to its citizens, but considers that in some cases this introduces unnecessary rigidity;
meni, da bi bilo mogoče dvomiti v ustreznost razdelka 3 (Državljanstvo, svoboda, varnost in pravosodje) glede na obseg sredstev v primerjavi z vsemi drugimi razdelki, vendar pa je v političnem smislu kljub temu sprejemljiv; zavzema pozitivno stališče do vzpostavitve samostojnega podrazdelka za področje svobode, varnosti in pravosodja znotraj tega razdelka, da bi se zagotovila večja preglednost za to pomembno politično prednostno nalogo EU, hkrati pa želi zagotoviti, da se ne bi zmanjšalo financiranje drugih delov razdelka;
Considers that the relevance of Heading 3 (Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice) may be questioned in terms of the volume of appropriations compared with all the other headings, but that it is nevertheless acceptable in political terms; is in favour of the creation of an autonomous sub-heading for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice within this heading, in order to ensure greater visibility for this important political priority of the EU, and at the same time wishes to ensure that funding of the other parts of the heading is not reduced;
opozarja, da po začetku veljavnosti Ustave, ko ne bo več razlikovanja med obveznimi in neobveznimi izdatki, ločene obračunske enote sredstev za izdatke, povezane s trgom, in neposredna plačila iz razdelka 2 ne bodo več obstajala;
Recalls that once the Constitution is in force and the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure is abolished, the ring-fencing of resources for market-related expenditure and direct payments under Heading 2 will no longer exist;
je pripravljen ohraniti zgradbo, ki spodbuja nadzor s strani proračunskega organa nad upravnimi izdatki Komisije in je zato proti predlogu odstranitve tega izdatka iz razdelka 5; vendar pa kljub temu meni, da bi bilo treba ohraniti sistem upravljanja proračuna po dejavnostih, vzpostavljen zaradi proračunske nomenklature, in ga nadalje razvijati; zato podpira opustitev upravnih izdatkov Komisije s področja vsake politike, podpira pa vzpostavitev obvezujoče zgornje meje zunaj preglednice finančne perspektive z možnostjo zvišanja te zgornje meje, kar lahko stori le proračunski organ, ob uporabi kateregakoli drugega sredstva, ki ga bo ponudil prihodnji medinstitucionalni sporazum; poudarja, da bi morale strogost proračuna podpirati vse institucije EU;
Is willing to maintain a structure which facilitates control by the budgetary authority over the Commission's administrative expenditure and is therefore against the proposal to remove this expenditure from Heading 5; considers nevertheless that the Activity-Based Budgeting (ABB) system introduced for the budgetary nomenclature should be preserved and further developed; is therefore in favour of leaving the Commission's administrative expenditure within each policy area but of establishing a binding ceiling outside the Financial Perspective table, with the possibility for this ceiling to be increased only by a decision of the budgetary authority, using any means offered by the future Interinstitutional Agreement; stresses that budgetary rigour should be upheld by all the EU institutions;