natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Spremembi Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Člen1, odstavek 2
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Article 1, paragraph 2
Sprememba 2 Člen 2, odstavek 1, pododstavek 2
Amendment 2 Article 2, paragraph 1, subparagraph 2
Komisija posreduje vse ustrezne informacije Računskemu sodišču
The Commission shall forward all relevant information to the Court of Auditors and shall
in od EBOR zahteva
request from the EBRD
vse dodatne informacije, ki bi jih
any supplementary information that
glede vidikov delovanja Sklada za zaščitno zgradbo černobilskega reaktorja, ki se nanašajo na prispevek Skupnosti.
may wish to receive, as regards the aspects of the operation of the Chernobyl Shelter Fund that relate to the Community's contribution.
Komisija posreduje vse ustrezne informacije
The Commission shall forward all relevant information to
proračunskemu organu in
the budgetary authority and
Računskemu sodišču
the Court of Auditors and shall
vse dodatne informacije, ki bi jih lahko
any supplementary information that
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o sklenitvi v imenu Evropske skupnosti Konvencije Združenih narodov proti korupciji ( KOM(2006)0082 – C6-0105/2006 – 2006/0023(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the United Nations Convention against Corruption ( COM(2006)0082 – C6-0105/2006 – 2006/0023(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2006)0082 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2006)0082 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju Konvencije ZN proti korupciji z dne 31. oktobra 2003,
having regard to the UN Convention against Corruption of 31 October 2003,
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe ES, zlasti členov 47(2), 57(2), 95, 107(5), 179, 181a, 190(5), 195(4), 199, 207(3), 218(2), 223 zadnji odstavek, 224 predzadnji odstavek, 225a predzadnji odstavek, 245(2), 248(4) zadnji odstavek, 255(2), 255(3), 260 drugi odstavek, 264 drugi odstavek, 266 zadnji odstavek, 279, 280, 283 in prvega pododstavka člena 300(2) Pogodbe,
having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Articles 47(2), 57(2), 95, 107(5), 179, 181a, 190(5), 195(4), 199, 207(3), 218(2), 223 final paragraph, 224 penultimate paragraph, 225a penultimate paragraph, 245(2), 248(4) final paragraph, 255(2), 255(3), 260 second paragraph, 264 second paragraph, 266 final paragraph, 279, 280, 283 and 300(2) first subparagraph thereof,
ob upoštevanju prvega pododstavka člena 300(3) Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0105/2006 ),
having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0105/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenja Odbora za proračunski nadzor ( A6-0380/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Budgetary Control ( A6-0380/2006 ),
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Sprememba Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Uvodna izjava 4 a (novo)
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Recital 4 a (new)
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Uredbe Sveta o spremembi Uredbe (ES) št. 1698/2005 o podpori za razvoj podeželja iz Evropskega kmetijskega sklada za razvoj podeželja (EKSRP) ( KOM(2006)0237 – C6-0237/2006 – 2006/0082(CNS) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) ( COM(2006)0237 – C6-0237/2006 – 2006/0082(CNS) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2006)0237 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2006)0237 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 37 Pogodbe ES, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0237/2006 ),
having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0237/2006 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kmetijstvo in razvoj podeželja ( A6-0319/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ( A6-0319/2006 ),
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Gabriela Albertinija ( 2006/2099(IMM) )
European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Gabriele Albertini ( 2006/2099(IMM) )
ob upoštevanju zahteve Gabriela Albertinija za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s kazenskim postopkom, ki je bil sprožen proti njemu pred okrožnim sodiščem v Milanu, in je bila vložena 25. aprila 2006, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 27. aprila 2006,
having regard to the request by Gabriele Albertini for defence of his immunity in connection with the criminal proceedings brought against him before the District Court of Milan, made on 25 April 2006, announced in plenary sitting on 27 April 2006,
po zaslišanju Gabriela Albertinija v skladu s členom 7(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having heard Gabriele Albertini in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju členov 9 in 10 Protokola z dne 8. aprila 1965 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti in člena 6(2) Akta z dne 20. septembra 1976 o volitvah poslancev Evropskega parlamenta s splošnimi neposrednimi volitvami,
having regard to Articles 9 and 10 of the Protocol of 8 April 1965 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0378/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0378/2006 ),
sklene, da zaščiti imuniteto in privilegije Gabriela Albertinija;
Decides to defend the immunity and privileges of Gabriele Albertini;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje ustreznim organom Republike Italije.
Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the appropriate authorities of the Italian Republic.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o zahtevi za zaščito imunitete in privilegijev Gabriela Albertinija ( 2006/2122(IMM) )
European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Gabriele Albertini ( 2006/2122(IMM) )
ob upoštevanju zahteve Gabriela Albertinija za zaščito njegove imunitete v zvezi s kazenskim postopkom pred okrožnim sodiščem v Milanu, ki jo je poslanec vložil 28. aprila 2006, na plenarnem zasedanju pa je bila razglašena 15. maja 2006,
having regard to the request by Gabriele Albertini for defence of his immunity in connection with the criminal proceedings brought against him before the District Court of Milan, made on 28 April 2006, announced in plenary sitting on 15 May 2006,
[1964] ECR 195 in Zadeva 149/85
[1964] ECR 195, and Case 149/85
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0383/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0383/2006 ),
ker je Gabriele Albertini poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, v katerega je bil izvoljen na šestih neposrednih volitvah, ki so potekale med 10. in 13. junijem 2004, in ker je Parlament veljavnost njegovega mandata preveril 14. decembra 2004 Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev (UL C 226 E, 15.9.2005, str.
whereas Gabriele Albertini is a Member of the European Parliament who was elected in the sixth direct elections of 10 to 13 June 2004 and whereas his credentials were verified by Parliament on 14 December 2004 European Parliament Decision on the verification of credentials (OJ C 226 E, 15.9.2005, p.
ker poslanci med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države, in ker se na imuniteto ni mogoče sklicevati, kadar se poslanca zaloti pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja; ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje, da bi uveljavljal pravico do nepriznanja imunitete kateremu izmed svojih poslancev Člen 10 Protokola z dne 8. aprila 1965 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
whereas during the sessions of the European Parliament its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament and whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members Article 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965.
ker je določba, ki se jo uporablja v zadevnem primeru, člen 68, 2. pododstavek italijanske ustave, ki dovoljuje uvedbo kazenskih postopkov proti poslancem parlamenta brez kakšnih posebnih formalnosti, saj določa, da se brez predhodne odobritve zbornice, kateri poslanec pripada, proti njemu ne sme uvesti osebne ali hišne preiskave ter da se ga ne sme aretirati ali mu na kakšen drug način odvzeti prostosti ali zadržati v priporu, razen če gre za izvršitev pravnomočne obsodbe ali če je bil zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja, za katerega je v primeru
whereas the provision applicable to the case in question is Article 68, second subparagraph, of the Italian Constitution, which allows criminal proceedings to be brought against Members of Parliament without any special formalities, given that it provides that, without the leave of the Chamber to which the Member belongs, a search may not be carried out on either the person or the domicile of a Member of Parliament and a Member may not be arrested or otherwise deprived of his or her personal freedom or kept in detention, except to enforce a final conviction or where the Member is caught in the act of committing a crime for which arrest is mandatory in case of
ker je urad javnega tožilca pri okrožnem sodišču v Milanu proti Gabrielu Albertiniju vložil obtožnico v zvezi z vlaganjem predlogov sprememb brez vsebine v proračunskem postopku v milanskem mestnem svetu z namenom, da bi vsebino vnesli kasneje glede na predloge opozicije, da bi se tako izognili vložitvi predlogov sprememb po roku za vložitev, kar bi bilo nesprejemljivo,
whereas the charges brought against Gabriele Albertini by the Public Prosecutor's Office of the District Court of Milan relate to the tabling of blank amendments under the budgetary procedure of the Milan City Council with a view to filling them in later in the light of the amendments tabled by the opposition, so as to avoid tabling amendments after the deadline, which would be inadmissible,
ker se vlaganje predlogov sprememb brez vsebine lahko obravnava kot del politike in političnega življenja in so predlogi sprememb, vse dokler ni sprejetega končnega zakona, na katerega se nanašajo, le del notranjega postopka brez zunanjih učinkov, zlasti in predvsem s stališča kazenske zakonodaje, se omenjeno dejanje obravnava kot nemogoče ali vsaj neobstoječe kaznivo dejanje,
whereas tabling blank amendments may be regarded as being an aspect of politics and political life and whereas, so long as the final act to which they refer has not been adopted, such amendments are simply acts of internal procedure with no external effect, in particular and above all from the point of view of criminal law, since the tabling of such amendments amounts to an impossible crime and in any case to a nonexistent crime,
ker je milansko okrožno sodišče v drugem sodnem postopku (zadeva št. 9384/03 R.G.N.R.), v katerem je preučevalo obtožbe, podobne tistim proti Gabrielu Albertiniju, ki pa jih je vložil sam Albertini proti svojim političnim nasprotnikom, odločilo, da je primer brezpredmeten in ga je zavrglo,
whereas, in other proceedings (Case No 9384/03 R.G.N.R.), the same District Court of Milan, called upon to consider allegations similar to those made against Gabriele Albertini but then made by Gabriele Albertini himself against his political opponents, held that there was no case to answer and dismissed the case,
ker je vsak primer političnega preganjanja poslancev Evropskega parlamenta napad na integriteto politične ustanove, ki so jo na demokratičen način izvolili evropski narodi, in kaže na zaničevanje Parlamenta,
whereas any case of political persecution of one of its Members is an attack on the integrity of the European Parliament as a political institution democratically elected by the peoples of Europe, and amounts to a contempt of Parliament,
ker neenakopraven odnos italijanskega sodišča škodi Gabrielu Albertiniju,
whereas the discriminatory attitude of the Italian court is damaging to Gabriele Albertini,
ker bi postopek proti Gabrielu Albertiniju lahko prekinili, če bi že veljal Statut poslancev Evropskega Parlamenta, ki pa še ni stopil v veljavo, čeprav ga je Evropski parlament dvakrat potrdil, in sicer v resolucijah z dne 5. decembra 2002 UL C 27 E, 30.1.2004, str.
whereas, if the Statute for Members of the European Parliament had already entered into force, which it has not yet, although the European Parliament has endorsed it twice, in its resolutions of 5 December 2002 OJ C 27 E, 30.1.2004, p.
in 17. decembra 2003 UL C 91 E, 15.4.2004, str.
and 17 December 2003 OJ C 91 E, 15.4.2004, p.
obžaluje dejstvo, da Protokol z dne 8. aprila 1965 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti v sedanji obliki Evropskemu parlamentu ne omogoča sprejetja zavezujočih ukrepov za zaščito Gabriela Albertinija, in se zato odloči ne zaščititi njegove imunitete;
Regrets that, as it stands, the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 does not afford the European Parliament the means of taking binding action in order to protect Gabriele Albertini, and therefore decides not to defend his immunity;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj ta sklep in poročilo pristojnega odbora nemudoma posreduje uradu javnega tožilca pri milanskem okrožnem sodišču v zvezi s kazensko zadevo št. 8629/05 R.G.
Instructs its President to forward this decision, and the report of the committee responsible, immediately to the Public Prosecutor's Office at the District Court of Milan in connection with criminal case No 8629/05 R.G.
Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o zahtevi za zaščito poslanske imunitete Gérarda Oneste ( 2006/2121(IMM) )
European Parliament decision on the request for defence of the immunity and privileges of Gérard Onesta ( 2006/2121(IMM) )
ob upoštevanju zahteve Monice Frassoni za zaščito poslanske imunitete Gérarda Oneste v zvezi s kazenskim postopkom, sproženim proti njemu pred tretjim senatom kazenskega pritožbenega sodišča v Toulouseu v Franciji, ki je bila vložena 17. maja 2006 in razglašena na plenarnem zasedanju 31. maja 2006,
having regard to the request by Monica Frassoni for defence of the immunity of Gérard Onesta in connection with the criminal proceedings brought against the latter before the Third Chamber of the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse, France, made on 17 May 2006, announced in plenary sitting on 31 May 2006,
po zaslišanju Gérarda Oneste v skladu s členom 7(3) svojega Poslovnika,
having heard Gérard Onesta in accordance with Rule 7(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju člena 26 Ustave Republike Francije,
having regard to Article 26 of the Constitution of the French Republic,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0386/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0386/2006 ),
ker je Gérard Onesta poslanec Evropskega parlamenta, v katerega je bil izvoljen na šestih neposrednih volitvah, ki so potekale med 10. in 13. junijem 2004, in ker je Parlament veljavnost njegovega mandata preveril 14. decembra 2004 Sklep Evropskega parlamenta o preverjanju veljavnosti mandatov poslancev (UL C 226 E, 15.9.2005, str.
whereas Gérard Onesta is a Member of the European Parliament who was elected in the sixth direct elections of 10 to 13 June 2004 and whereas his credentials were verified by Parliament on 14 December 2004 European Parliament Decision on the verification of credentials (OJ C 226 E, 15.9.2005, p.
ker poslanci med zasedanjem Evropskega parlamenta uživajo na ozemlju svoje države imunitete, priznane poslancem parlamenta te države, in ker sklicevanje na imuniteto ni mogoče, kadar je poslanec zaloten pri storitvi kaznivega dejanja; ker to Evropskemu parlamentu ne preprečuje uresničevanje pravice do odvzema imunitete svojemu članu Člen 10 Protokola z dne 8. aprila 1965 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti.
whereas, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members enjoy in the territory of their own State the immunities accorded to members of their parliament and whereas immunity cannot be claimed when a Member is caught in the act of committing an offence; whereas this does not prevent the European Parliament from exercising its right to waive the immunity of one of its Members Article 10 of the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965.
ker je kazensko pritožbeno sodišče v Toulouseu obsodilo Gérarda Onesto na tri mesece zaporne kazni in torej izreklo strožjo kazen, kot je bila tista, ki je bila izrečena drugemu obtožencu, in ker je isto sodišče svoji različni sodbi utemeljilo s trditvijo, da je imel Gérard Onesta v svoji vlogi poslanca Parlamenta bolj kot kateri koli drugi državljan na voljo sredstva, da pride do besede na političnih forumih, zlasti ob podpori ostalih izvoljenih članov njegove stranke, njegove poslanske skupine v skupščini in po potrebi tudi medijev, saj je – po navedbah francoskega sodišča – strokovnjak na področju umetnosti komunikacije,
whereas the Court of Criminal Appeals of Toulouse sentenced Gérard Onesta to three months' imprisonment, thus applying a stricter sanction than the one reserved to the other accused and whereas the self same court justified this different decision by stating that, in his capacity as a parliamentarian, Gérard Onesta had, more so than any other citizen, the means available to make his voice heard in political fora, in particular with the support of other elected members of his party, his group in the Assembly and, if necessary, the media, as he is, according to the French court, an expert in the art of communication,
ker strožje kaznovanje Gérarda Oneste zgolj zaradi njegovega položaja poslanca Parlamenta predstavlja očitno diskriminacijo do izvoljenih politikov, saj se zdi, da slednjim ni dovoljeno sodelovati na javnih protestih enako kot ostalim državljanom, ker imajo na voljo druga, bolj učinkovita sredstva izražanja; ker bi to lahko pripeljalo do nesprejemljivega zaključka, da lahko poslanci Parlamenta delujejo le v okvirih političnih skupščin ter da zunaj teh forumov uživajo manj pravic in imajo na voljo manj sredstev izražanja kot drugi državljani,
whereas punishing Gérard Onesta more severely only in view of his status as a parliamentarian constitutes a clear case of discrimination against elected politicians, in so far as it seems that, since they have other and more effective means of expression, they are not permitted to engage in public demonstrations in the same way as other citizens and whereas this would therefore entail the unacceptable conclusion that Members of a Parliament are only allowed to act in political assemblies and that, outside those fora, they enjoy fewer rights and means of expression than any other citizen,
ker Gérard Onesta trdi, da je bil njegov namen usmeriti pozornost na dejstvo, da je Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti spoznalo Francijo za krivo, ker v svojo zakonodajo ni prenesla Direktive 2001/18/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 12. marca 2001 o namernem sproščanju gensko spremenjenih organizmov v okolje UL L 106, 17.4.2001, str.
whereas Gérard Onesta maintains that his intention was to draw attention to the fact that the Court of Justice of the European Communities found against France for failing to transpose Directive 2001/18/CE of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms OJ L 106, 17.4.2001, p.
ker je ta zadeva izredno občutljiva in so njene posledice glede pooblastil in pristojnosti Evropskega parlament nesprejemljive, saj je treba odločno obsoditi diskriminatorni odnos francoskega sodišča in posledično politično oškodovanje državljanskih pravic Gérarda Oneste,
whereas the issue at stake is extremely delicate and its consequences for the prerogatives of the European Parliament are unacceptable, as the discriminatory attitude of the French court and the resulting political prejudice to Gérard Onesta's civil rights are to be strongly deplored,
ker je vsak primer političnega preganjanja poslancev Evropskega parlamenta napad na integriteto te politične ustanove, ki so jo na demokratičen način izvolili evropski narodi, ter je to mogoče razumeti kot zaničevanje Parlamenta, in ker je Evropski parlament kot demokratična ustanova dolžan braniti svoja pooblastila in pristojnosti z vsemi sredstvi, ki jih ima na voljo,
whereas any case of political persecution of one of its Members is an attack on the integrity of the European Parliament as a political institution, democratically elected by the peoples of Europe, and amounts to a contempt of Parliament and whereas, as a democratic institution, the European Parliament is bound to defend its prerogatives using all the means at its disposal,
obžaluje dejstvo, da Protokol z dne 8. aprila 1965 o privilegijih in imunitetah Evropskih skupnosti v sedanji obliki Evropskemu parlamentu ne omogoča sprejetja zavezujočih ukrepov za zaščito Gérarda Oneste, in se zato odloči, da ne zaščiti njegove imunitete.
Regrets that, as it stands, the Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities of 8 April 1965 does not afford the European Parliament the means of taking binding action in order to protect Gérard Onesta and therefore decides not to defend his immunity.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Direktive Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o določitvi okvira za ukrepe Skupnosti na področju politike morskega okolja (Direktiva o morski strategiji) ( KOM(2005)0505 – C6-0346/2005 – 2005/0211(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Framework for Community Action in the field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Directive) ( COM(2005)0505 – C6-0346/2005 – 2005/0211(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2005)0505 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2005)0505 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) in člena 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0346/2005 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0346/2005 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane ter mnenja Odbora za ribištvo ( A6-0373/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Fisheries ( A6-0373/2006 ),
Morsko okolje je dragocena dediščina, ki jo je treba kot tako varovati, obnavljati in obravnavati s končnim ciljem zagotavljanja biološko raznolikih in dinamičnih oceanov ter morij, ki so varni, čisti, zdravi in produktivni.
The marine environment is a precious heritage that must be protected, restored and treated as such with the ultimate aim of providing biologically diverse and dynamic oceans and seas that are safe, clean, healthy and productive.
Evropo obdajajo štiri morja: Sredozemsko, Baltsko, Severno in Črno, ter dva oceana: Atlantski in Arktični.
Europe is surrounded by four seas - the Mediterranean, the Baltic, the North Sea and the Black Sea - and by two oceans - the Atlantic and the Arctic.