natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je v preteklih obdobjih poročanja prihajalo do velikih zamud, zaradi česar so na primer v sedanjem poročilu z dne 3. avgusta 2009 (24. poročilo Komisije o analizi kazni, določenih za resne kršitve socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu) obravnavani šele podatki za leti 2005 in 2006, zaradi česar skoraj ni mogoče oblikovati zaključkov o sedanjem stanju usklajenosti socialnih predpisov za uporabnike cestnega prometa;
Points out that in past reporting periods there have been significant delays, so that, for example, the current report of 3 August 2009 (the 24th report from the Commission analysing the penalties for serious infringements against the social rules in road transport) deals only with data from 2005 and 2006, and hence can draw hardly any conclusions about the current state of harmonisation of the social rules for road transport users;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj naredijo vse, kar je v njihovi moči, za zagotovitev hitrejše izpolnitve ciljev iz člena 17 Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006, da bodo za prihodnje ukrepe usklajevanja na voljo novejši statistični podatki;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to do their utmost to ensure that the objectives set out in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 are fulfilled more quickly, so that more recent statistics are available for future harmonisation measures;
opozarja, da so tudi v prilogi IV k Uredbi (ES) št. 1071/2009 navedene resne kršitve v smislu te uredbe; zato meni, da je usklajena kategorizacija resnih kršitev socialnih predpisov zelo pomembna;
Points out that Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 also contains a list of serious infringements within the meaning of this Regulation; therefore considers that a harmonised categorisation of serious infringements against the social rules is extremely necessary;
ugotavlja, da se razlike v kaznih za resne kršitve socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu v skladu z zakonodajo držav članic ne kažejo le v višini glob, ampak tudi v vrstah in kategorizaciji kazni;
Notes that the differences in penalties for serious infringements against the social rules in road transport as provided for in the legislation of the Member States concern not only the level of fines, but also the types and the categorisation of the penalties;
poudarja, da je te razlike mogoče pripisati gospodarskim in geografskim dejavnikom ter različnim pravnim sistemom držav članic v kazenskih postopkih in različnim političnim pristopom k vprašanjem varnosti v cestnem prometu;
Points out that these differences can be explained by economic and geographical factors, as well as the Member States' differing legal systems in criminal matters and their differing policy approaches to road safety;
ugotavlja, da socialni predpisi v cestnem prometu, zlasti Uredba (EGS) št. 3821/85 in Uredba (ES) št. 561/2006 ter Direktiva 2006/22/ES, omogočajo državam članicam zelo različne razlage; obžaluje, da številne nenatančne ubeseditve evropskih predpisov neizogibno povzročajo neenotno izvajanje v državah članicah; meni, da je za doseganje nadaljnje usklajenosti najprej potrebna enotna in zavezujoča razlaga teh uredb in direktive;
Notes that the social rules in road transport, in particular Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 and Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, together with Directive 2006/22/EC, afford the Member States a great deal of scope for interpretation; regrets that the many imprecise formulations in the European rules necessarily result in a failure to achieve uniform transposition into national law in the Member States; takes the view that to achieve further harmonisation we first need uniform and binding interpretation of these Regulations and the Directive;
obžaluje, da nekatere države članice ne poznajo razlikovanja kazni glede na resnost kršitve; poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo nacionalne predpise, ki bodo imeli dejanski, sorazmeren in odvračilen učinek in bodo upoštevali resnost kršitve;
Regrets that some Member States do not provide for differentiation of penalties according to the seriousness of the infringement; calls on the Member States to adopt national legislation that has an effective, proportionate and dissuasive effect and that takes due account of how serious an infringement is;
poudarja, da lahko učinkovit, uravnotežen in odvračilen kazenski sistem temelji le na jasnih in preglednih kaznih, primerljivih med državami članicami; poziva države članice, naj poiščejo zakonodajne in praktične rešitve za zmanjšanje deloma zelo velikih razlik v vrsti in višini kazni;
Emphasises that an effective, balanced and dissuasive penalty system can only be based on clear, transparent and comparable penalties across the Member States; calls on the Member States to find legislative and practical ways of reducing the in some cases very substantial differences in the type and level of penalties applied;
poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj po posvetovanju z nadzornimi organi in predstavniki prevoznega sektorja vzpostavi enotno in zavezujočo razlago uredbe o časih vožnje in počitka.
Calls on the European Commission, after consulting inspection bodies and representatives of the transport sector, to come up with a uniform and binding interpretation of the Regulation on driving and resting hours.
meni, da je treba za nadaljnjo uskladitev vrst kazni in višine glob določiti kategorizacijo glob v povezavi s kategorizacijo kazni ter najnižje in najvišje kazni za posamezne kršitve socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu; poudarja, da je treba pri racionalizaciji kazni potrebo po pošteni globi, ki bo sorazmerna v različnih državah članicah v skladu z objektivnimi merili (na primer BNP ali geografski dejavniki), uravnotežiti z učinkovitim odvračanjem od resnih kršitev;
Takes the view that to achieve further approximation of the types of penalties and of the levels of fines, a categorization of fines linked to a categorization of penalties is needed, and minimum and maximum penalties for each infringement against the social rules in road transport should be laid down; stresses that in streamlining penalties the need for fair fines to be proportionate in the different Member States in accordance with objective criteria (such as GNP or geographical factors) must be balanced by an effective deterrent against serious infringements;
poudarja, da je treba novo prilogo III k Direktivi 2006/22/ES, uvedeno z Direktivo Komisije 2009/5/ES, obravnavati kot temelj enotnega pristopa k razvrstitvi kršitev socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu v skladu z zakonodajo držav članic; odločno poziva države članice, naj sprejmejo potrebne pravne in upravne predpise za hiter prenos Direktive Komisije 2009/5/ES v zakonodajo;
Points out that the new Annex III to Directive 2006/22/EC introduced by Commission Directive 2009/5/EC should be evaluated as the foundation for a uniform approach to categorising infringements against the social rules in road transport as laid down in the legislation of the Member States; urges the Member States to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary for rapid transposition of Commission Directive 2009/5/EC;
poleg tega poudarja, da je bil z Lizbonsko pogodbo v Pogodbo o delovanju Evropske unije vstavljen nov člen 83(2) o približevanju določb kazenske zakonodaje in drugih predpisov držav članic; poziva Komisijo, naj preuči ta nova zakonodajna sredstva na področju pravosodnega sodelovanja v kazenskih zadevah ter v dvanajstih mesecih predloži Svetu in Evropskemu parlamentu poročilo o možnih uskladitvenih ukrepih, vključno z vidiki, povezanimi z varnostjo cestnega prometa in čezmejno uporabo glob, če tega še ni storila;
Also recalls that the Treaty of Lisbon has inserted in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union a new Article 83(2) on the approximation of criminal laws and regulations of the Member States; calls on the Commission to examine these new legislative means in the field of judicial cooperation in criminal matters and to submit, within twelve months, a report to the Council and the European Parliament on the possible harmonisation measures, including aspects relating to road safety and the cross-border application of fines, if it has not already done so;
pozdravlja, da je Komisija v skladu s členom 22(4) Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 pripravila „smernice“ kot pomoč posameznim državam članicam pri razlagi in uporabi te uredbe; vseeno ugotavlja, da te smernice niso pravno zavezujoče, zato niso dosegle svojega namena – enotnega izvajanja v državah članicah;
Welcomes the fact that pursuant to Article 22(4) of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 the Commission has prepared ‘guidelines’ to support the Member States in the national interpretation and application of this Regulation; notes, however, that the guidelines are not legally binding and have therefore not achieved their aim of uniform transposition in the Member States;
meni, da je treba za doseganje notranjega trga na področju prometa ter povečanje pravne varnosti voznikov in prevoznikov uskladiti razlago uporabe socialne zakonodaje; ob upoštevanju tega poziva Komisijo, naj skupaj s konfederacijo organizacij za nadzor cestnega prometa (Corte), evropsko mrežo prometnih policij (Tispol) in organizacijo Euro Contrôle Route predloži predloge za končanje diskriminatorne uporabe socialne zakonodaje v cestnem prometu; v zvezi s tem poudarja potrebo po skupni razlagi uporabe Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006 in Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85, in sicer vsakega posameznega člena;
Considers that, in order to achieve an internal market in transport and to increase legal certainty for drivers and hauliers, the interpretation of the application of social legislation should be harmonised; with this in mind calls on the Commission, in cooperation with Corte, Tispol and Euro Contrôle Route, to submit proposals seeking to put an end to the discriminatory application of social legislation in road transport; highlights in this connection the need for a common, article-by-article interpretation of the application of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 and Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85;
poziva države članice, naj uporabljajo te smernice pri izvajanju socialnih predpisov, da bodo zagotovile usklajeno izvajanje;
Calls on the Member States to take account of these guidelines in implementing the social rules so as to ensure that harmonised transposition is achieved;
poudarja, da je nelojalno konkurenco mogoče preprečiti ter varnost v cestnem prometu zagotoviti le z doslednim in nediskriminatornim izvajanjem veljavne zakonodaje; odločno poudarja, da je za izvajanje socialnih predpisov v cestnem prometu potrebna usklajena in učinkovita zasnova kontrolnih pregledov;
Stresses that unfair competition can be avoided and road transport safety guaranteed only by consistent and non-discriminatory enforcement of the applicable legislation; emphasises that a harmonised and effective approach to checks is essential for the transposition of the social rules in road transport;
opozarja, da je stanje v prometu glede na infrastrukturo, obseg prometa in prometne zastoje zelo različno v posameznih državah članicah, zato meni, da je te dejavnike med drugim mogoče upoštevati pri določanju pogostosti pregledov, ob dejstvu, da je eden izmed glavnih namenov zagotoviti skladnost s socialnimi predpisi;
Points out that the traffic situation, in terms of infrastructure, volume of traffic and congestion, varies widely between the Member States and therefore considers that these factors, inter alia, could be taken into account in determining the frequency of checks, bearing in mind that one of their main purposes is to ensure compliance with social welfare rules;
je prepričan, da bi lahko za odpravo ovir za evropski notranji trg in izboljšanje varnosti cestnega prometa Komisija spodbujala take usklajene zasnove kontrolnih pregledov in sprejemala regulativne ukrepe; poziva Komisijo, naj za dosego teh ciljev oblikuje učinkovit in ustrezen instrument usklajevanja na evropski ravni;
Believes that the Commission should develop and promote such harmonised approaches to checks and take regulatory action so as to remove obstacles to the European single market and improve road safety; calls on the Commission, in order to achieve these objectives, to create an effective and appropriate coordination instrument at the European level;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi priporočila in evropske minimalne standarde za usposabljanje nadzornih organov in za usklajevanje njihovega sodelovanja; poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša zbiranje statističnih podatkov za bolj sporočilno analizo učinkovitega izvajanja in spodbuja usklajeno ravnanje držav članic v zvezi z izvajanjem;
Calls on the Commission to draw up recommendations and European minimum standards for the training of inspection bodies and for coordinating cooperation between the inspection bodies; asks the Commission to improve the collection of statistical information so as to enable more meaningful analysis of the effectiveness of enforcement and promote a harmonised approach by the Member States to enforcement issues;
poziva države članice, naj svoje izvršilno osebje vedno usposabljajo v skladu z najnovejšimi razvojnimi dosežki glede zbiranja podatkov, pri izvajanju skupnih standardov pa naj tesno sodelujejo z Evropsko komisijo z namenom spodbujanja usklajenega pristopa k preverjanjem, s čimer se ustvarja pravna varnost;
Calls on the Member States always to train their enforcement staff in the latest developments in data collection and, in implementing common standards, to work closely with the European Commission in order to promote a harmonised approach to checks, thus creating legal certainty;
meni, da je treba izvajati pogostejše in temeljitejše kontrolne preglede na cestah in v prostorih podjetij; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da države članice upoštevajo število preverjanj, ki jih je treba organizirati, kot določa člen 2(3) Direktive 2006/22/ES; poziva Komisijo, naj Evropski parlament obvesti o nadaljnjih ukrepih, ki jih namerava sprejeti glede teh preverjanj;
Takes the view that more frequent and thorough checks must be made both at the roadside and at the premises of undertakings; calls on the Commission to ensure that the Member States respect the amount of checks to be organised, as referred to in Article 2(3) of Directive 2006/22/EC; calls on the Commission to inform the European Parliament of the further steps it intends to take with regard to these checks;
poziva Komisijo, naj čim prej predloži poročilo o preverjanjih pomanjkljivosti, ki vplivajo na digitalne tahografe, in ukrepih za odpravljanje njihovih pomanjkljivosti;
Calls on the Commission to submit, as soon as possible, a report on the checks made on the shortcomings affecting digital tachographs and the steps taken to prevent their vulnerability;
poudarja, da je treba digitalni tahograf na podlagi Uredbe (EGS) št. 3821/85 kot instrument za preverjanje izboljšati: Komisija mora preučiti, kako naj nadzorni organi dosežejo hitrejši prenos podatkov iz digitalnega tahografa;
Underlines that the digital tachograph, based on Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85, should be improved as an instrument for checking: the Commission should investigate how to achieve faster downloading of data from the digital tachograph by the controlling authorities;
opozarja na pritožbeni oddelek za nesorazmerne kazni, ki ga je vzpostavila organizacija Euro Contrôle Route, voznike in prevoznike pa poziva, naj se v primeru nesorazmerne uporabe socialne zakonodaje za cestni promet obrnejo na ta pritožbeni oddelek;
Draws attention to the Disproportionate Fines Complaint Desk set up by Euro Contrôle Route, and calls on drivers and hauliers to apply to this complaint desk in the event of disproportionate application of social legislation for road transport;
meni, da bi bila razumljiva brošura v vseh uradnih jezikih Evropske unije koristna za podjetja in voznike tovornih vozil; poudarja, da bi morala ta brošura bolje obveščati zadevne voznike in podjetja o veljavnih socialnih predpisih in z njimi povezanih kaznih v posameznih državah članicah; meni, da morajo biti tovrstne informacije na voljo tudi podjetjem in voznikom iz tretjih držav; opozarja na pomen uporabe inteligentnih prevoznih sistemov, ki voznike v realnem času obveščajo o takšnih informacijah;
Considers that an easily understandable brochure in all official languages of the European Union would be useful for undertakings and for lorry drivers; stresses that this brochure should give the drivers and undertakings concerned more information about the relevant social rules and the penalties applicable to infringements in the various Member States; considers that such information should also be made available to undertakings and drivers from third countries; draws attention to the value of using intelligent transport systems to provide drivers with such information in real time;
je prepričan, da mora v okviru uporabe sodobnih sistemov informacijsko-komunikacijskih tehnologij in inteligentnih prevoznih sistemov obstajati možnost, da podjetja in vozniki pridobijo informacije o veljavnih socialnih predpisih in kaznih za njihovo kršitev;
Is convinced that in the context of using modern information and communication technologies and intelligent transport systems, the possibility should exist for businesses and drivers to obtain information on the social rules in force and the penalties for infringing them;
poziva vse države članice, naj okrepijo sodelovanje na podlagi obstoječih struktur, kot je organizacija Euro Contrôle Route, ter s tem izboljšajo usklajevanje skupnih preverjanj, izmenjavo najboljše prakse in skupno organizacijo programov usposabljanja nadzornih organov;
Calls on all the Member States to reinforce cooperation on the basis of existing structures such as Euro Contrôle Route and in this way to improve coordination of common checks, exchange of best practice and joint organisation of training programmes for control bodies;
meni, da je treba za obveščanje voznikov tovornih vozil, tudi tistih iz sosednjih držav, v realnem času o ustreznih socialnih predpisih in kaznih, ki veljajo za kršitve v različnih državah članicah, uporabiti vso razpoložljivo tehnologijo, na primer z uporabo sistema GPS ali drugih razpoložljivih orodij;
Considers that all available technology should be used to inform lorry drivers, including those coming from neighbouring countries, in real time about the relevant social rules and the penalties applicable to infringements in the various Member States, for example with the use of GPS or other tools available;
poziva države članice, naj zagotovijo ustrezno infrastrukturo, vključno z zadostnim številom varnih parkirnih površin ter storitev, v evropskem cestnem omrežju, da bodo lahko vozniki dejansko upoštevali predpise o časih vožnje in počitka ter se bodo lahko učinkovito izvajali kontrolni pregledi; poudarja, da je treba pri tej infrastrukturi nameniti posebno pozornost vidiku varnosti; poziva Komisijo, naj v najustreznejši obliki redno objavlja podatke o javni in zasebni infrastrukturi, ki je na voljo v evropskem cestnem omrežju, in zagotovi informacije o storitvah, ki so na voljo delavcem v cestnem sektorju;
Calls on the Member States to establish an appropriate infrastructure, including a sufficient number of safe parking spaces and services, on the European road network so that drivers can in fact comply with the provisions on driving times and rest periods and so that checks can be carried out efficiently; points out that the security aspect must be of particular importance in the case of these facilities; calls on the Commission periodically to publish, in the most appropriate format, the facilities available, both public and private, across the European road network, providing information on the services on offer for road sector professionals;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj spodbujajo in financirajo sheme za gradnjo varnih parkirišč, ki so nujna, da bi vozniki lahko upoštevali določbe iz Uredbe (ES) št. 561/2006;
Calls on the Commission and the Member States to encourage and finance schemes for the construction of secure parking areas, since these are indispensable if drivers are to respect the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006;
je zaskrbljen, ker korupcija ogroža pravno državo, vodi do zlorabe sredstev EU, ki jih zagotavljajo davkoplačevalci, in izkrivlja trg ter ima tudi vlogo v sedanji gospodarski krizi,
concerned that corruption undermines the rule of law, leads to the misuse of EU funds provided by the taxpayer, and distorts the market, having played a role in the current economic crisis,
ker je Unija ratificirala Konvencijo ZN proti korupciji in se 78 % državljanov Unije strinja, da je korupcija glavna skrb v njihovi državi (Eurobarometer, december 2009),
whereas the Union has ratified the UN Convention against Corruption, and 78% of Union citizens agree that corruption is a major concern in their country (Eurobarometer, December 2009),
ob upoštevanju poudarka, ki ga Parlament namenja boju proti korupciji v svoji resoluciji o stockholmskem programu v zvezi s svobodo, varnostjo in pravico,
having regard to the emphasis placed by Parliament on combating corruption in its resolution on the Stockholm Programme regarding freedom, security and justice,
ob upoštevanju mednarodnega dne proti korupciji (9. december), ko je bila oblikovana ta izjava,
noting the International Day against Corruption (9 December), on which this declaration is launched,
poziva evropske institucije, da sprejmejo celovito protikorupcijsko politiko in oblikujejo jasen mehanizem za redno spremljanje razmer v državah članicah;
Urges the European institutions to adopt a comprehensive anti-corruption policy and create a clear mechanism for monitoring the situation in the Member States on a regular basis;
poziva Komisijo, da zagotovi vsa potrebna sredstva za izvedbo tega mehanizma za spremljanje ter zagotovi, da se vsi njeni sklepi in ugotovitve dejansko upoštevajo;
Calls on the Commission to provide all necessary resources to implement this monitoring mechanism and ensure that its conclusions and findings are followed up effectively;
poziva Komisijo in vse ustrezne agencije Unije, da sprejmejo vse potrebne ukrepe in dajo na voljo zadostna sredstva, da bi zagotovili, da sredstva EU ne bodo predmet korupcije, ter sprejmejo odvračilne sankcije, če ugotovijo korupcijo in goljufijo;
Calls on the Commission and the relevant Union agencies to take all necessary measures and provide sufficient resources to ensure that EU funds are not subject to corruption, and to adopt dissuasive sanctions where corruption and fraud are found;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to izjavo skupaj z imeni podpisnikov Seznam podpisnikov je objavljen v Prilogi 1 k zapisniku z dne 18. maja 2010 ( P7_PV(2010)05-18(ANN1) ).
Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories The list of signatories is published in Annex 1 to the Minutes of 18 May 2010 ( P7_PV(2010)05-18(ANN1) ).
posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in državam članicam.
, to the Council, the Commission, and the Member States.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. maja 2010 o skupnem stališču Sveta v prvi obravnavi z namenom sprejetja Sklepa Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o spremembi Odločbe št. 573/2007/ES o ustanovitvi Evropskega sklada za begunce za obdobje 2008–2013 glede ukinitve financiranja nekaterih ukrepov Skupnosti ter spremembe omejitve njihovega financiranja (16627/1/2009 – C7-0051/2010 – 2009/0026(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 May 2010 on the Council position at first reading for adopting a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 by removing funding for certain Community actions and altering the limit for funding such actions (16627/1/2009 – C7-0051/2010 – 2009/0026(COD) )
ob upoštevanju stališča Sveta v prvi obravnavi (16627/1/2009 – C7-0051/2010 ),
having regard to the Council position at first reading (16627/1/2009 – C7-0051/2010 ),
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2009)0067 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council ( COM(2009)0067 ),