natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker so obrazci, ki se uporabljajo pri takem početju, navadno dvoumni in težko razumljivi ter napeljujejo na zmotno prepričanje o brezplačnem vpisu v poslovni imenik, v resnici pa podjetja zavežejo k neželenim pogodbam za oglaševanje v tovrstnih imenikih,
whereas the forms used in such practices are usually ambiguous and difficult to understand, inducing the erroneous idea of a free listing in a business directory but in fact entrapping businesses into unwanted contracts for advertising in business directories,
ker v državah članicah ne obstaja posebna zakonodaja EU niti nacionalna zakonodaja v zvezi s podjetji za imeniške storitve in odnosi med podjetji, ter ker so države članice pristojne, da uvedejo celovitejšo in daljnosežnejšo zakonodajo,
whereas neither specific EU legislation nor national legislation exists in Member States concerning directory companies in business-to-business relationships, and whereas Member States have a discretion to introduce more comprehensive and far-reaching legislation,
ker se Direktiva 2006/114/ES uporablja tudi za poslovanje med podjetji in "zavajajoče oglaševanje" opredeljuje kot "vsako oglaševanje, ki na kateri koli način, vključno s predstavitvijo, zavaja ali bi utegnilo zavajati osebe, ki jim je namenjeno, ali osebe, ki jih doseže, in ki bi zaradi svoje zavajajoče narave verjetno vplivalo na ekonomsko obnašanje oseb ali ki iz enakih razlogov škodi ali bi utegnilo škoditi konkurentom"; ker pa so različne razlage tega, kaj je zavajajoče, očitno največja praktična ovira v boju proti takemu ravnanju podjetij za imeniške storitve v odnosih med podjetji,
whereas Directive 2006/114/EC also applies to business-to-business transactions and defines "misleading advertising" as "any advertising which in any way, including its presentation, deceives or is likely to deceive the persons to whom it is addressed or whom it reaches and which, by reason of its deceptive nature, is likely to affect their economic behaviour or which, for those reasons, injures or is likely to injure a competitor"; whereas, however, different interpretations of what is "misleading" seem to be a major practical impediment in combating such practices of directory companies in business-to-business relationships,
ker Direktiva 2005/29/ES prepoveduje "v tržno gradivo vključiti račun ali podoben zahtevek za plačilo, ki daje potrošniku vtis, da je že naročil izdelek, ki se oglašuje, čeprav tega ni storil"; ker pa se ta direktiva ne uporablja za zavajajoče prakse med podjetji in se zato nanjo v sedanji obliki ni mogoče sklicevati za pomoč vlagateljem peticije; ker pa ta direktiva ne izključuje sistema nacionalnih pravil o nepoštenih trgovskih praksah, ki bi v vseh okoliščinah veljala za potrošnike in podjetja,
whereas Directive 2005/29/EC prohibits the practice of "including in marketing material an invoice or similar document seeking payment which gives the consumer the impression that he has already ordered the marketed product when he has not"; whereas, however, that Directive does not apply to business-to-business misleading practices and therefore, in its current form, cannot be relied upon to help the petitioners; whereas, however, that Directive does not preclude a system of national rules on unfair commercial practices that is equally applicable under all circumstances to consumers and enterprises,
ker Direktiva 2005/29/ES državam članicam ne preprečuje, da njene uporabe ne bi z nacionalno zakonodajo razširile tudi na podjetja, vendar bi to privedlo do različne ravni zaščite podjetij, ki so žrtve zavajajočega ravnanja podjetij za poslovne imenike v različnih državah članicah,
whereas Directive 2005/29/EC does not preclude Member States from extending its application also to businesses through national law; whereas, however, this leads to differing levels of protection for businesses which are victims of misleading practices by business-directory companies in different Member States,
ker po Uredbi (ES) št. 2006/2004 "kršitev znotraj Skupnosti" pomeni "vsakršno dejanje ali opustitev v nasprotju z zakonodajo o varstvu interesov potrošnikov ..., ki škoduje ali bi utegnila škodovati kolektivnim interesom potrošnikov, ki prebivajo v drugi državi članici ali drugih državah članicah, kot je tista, iz katere izvira ali v kateri je prišlo do storitve dejanja ali opustitve, ali v kateri ima odgovorni prodajalec ali dobavitelj svoj sedež; ali v kateri so na voljo dokazi ali sredstva, ki se nanašajo na dejanje ali opustitev"; ker pa se ta direktiva ne uporablja za zavajajoče prakse med podjetji in se zato nanjo v tej obliki ni mogoče sklicevati niti z njo pomagati vlagateljem peticije,
whereas Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 defines "intra-Community infringement" as "any act or omission contrary to the laws that protect consumers' interests … that harms, or is likely to harm, the collective interests of consumers residing in a Member State or Member States other than the Member State where the act or omission originated or took place; or where the responsible seller or supplier is established; or where evidence or assets pertaining to the act or omission are to be found"; whereas, however, that Directive does not apply to business-to-business misleading practices and therefore, in its current form, cannot be relied upon either to help the petitioners,
ker so te zavajajoče poslovne prakse v glavnem usmerjene na mala podjetja, vendar so med njimi tudi posamezniki in celo nepridobitni subjekti, kot so nevladne in dobrodelne organizacije, šole, knjižnice in krajevna društva, denimo klubi v društvenih prostorih,
whereas the targets of these misleading business practices are, in the main, small businesses but also include professionals and even non-profit making entities such as non-governmental organisations, charities, schools and libraries and local social clubs such as band clubs,
ker imajo podjetja za imeniške storitve pogosto sedež v drugi državi članici kot žrtve, zaradi česar te težje poiščejo zaščito nacionalnih organov zaradi različnih razlag tega, kaj je zavajajoče; ker žrtvam pogosto ne pomagajo niti nacionalni zakonodajni okviri in organi za varstvo potrošnikov, češ da je zakon namenjen varstvu potrošnikov, ne podjetij; ker so žrtve večinoma mala podjetja, ki nimajo zadostnih sredstev za uporabo učinkovitih pravnih sredstev s sodnimi postopki, mehanizmi samoregulacije za imenike pa niso pomembni, ker jih tisti, ki so udeleženi v zavajajočem oglaševanju, ne upoštevajo,
whereas the business-directory companies are often established in a Member State other than the victim's, making it difficult for victims to turn to national authorities for protection due to the existence of different interpretations in Member States of what is considered misleading; whereas victims also often find no redress from national legislative frameworks and consumer protection authorities because they are told that the law is intended to protect consumers and not businesses; whereas, being small businesses, most victims often lack the resources to pursue an effective remedy through litigation, and whereas self-regulatory mechanisms for directories are of little relevance as they are disregarded by those that engage in misleading advertising,
ker podjetja za imeniške storitve ali njihovi izterjevalci dosledno terjajo plačilo od žrtev takšnega ravnanja; ker se žrtve pritožujejo nad stisko in ogroženostjo zaradi takega pristopa in mnogi pa nazadnje proti svoji volji plačajo, da bi se izognili nadaljnjemu nadlegovanju,
whereas victims of these practices are rigorously pursued to pay up by the business-directory companies themselves or even by debt-collection agencies engaged by them; whereas victims complain that they feel distressed and threatened by these approaches and many of them often end up paying unwillingly in order to avoid further harassment,
ker so se žrtve, ki zavrnejo plačilo – z nekaj izjemami – redko znašle pred sodiščem,
whereas victims who refuse to pay have – with a few exceptions – seldom been pursued in court,
ker je več držav članic sprejelo pobude za obravnavo tega problema, predvsem v povezavi z osveščanjem v podjetjih, ki bi lahko bila prizadeta, in ker to vsebuje izmenjavo informacij, svetovanje, obveščanje organov kazenskega pregona in v nekaterih primerih vodenje registra pritožb,
whereas a number of Member States have adopted initiatives, notably of an awareness-raising nature, among potentially affected companies and whereas this includes information-sharing, advice, alerting state enforcement authorities and in some cases maintaining a complaints register in order to tackle this problem,
ker je Avstrija po letu 2000 spremenila nacionalni zakon o nepoštenih trgovskih praksah, ki zdaj v členu 28a navaja, da je "v okviru poslovanja in z namenom konkurence prepovedano oglaševati vpis v imenike, kot so rumene strani, telefonski imenik ali podobni seznami, s plačilnim nalogom, nakazilom, fakturo, ponudbo za popravek ali na drug podoben način ali neposredno ponujati tak vpis, ne da bi nedvoumno in tudi z jasnimi grafičnimi sredstvi poudarili, da je tak oglas le ponudba za sklenitev pogodbe",
whereas Austria has since 2000 changed its national Unfair Commercial Practices Law, and whereas Section 28a thereof now states: "It shall be prohibited to advertise, in the scope of business and for the purpose of competition, for registration in directories, such as yellow pages, telephone directory or similar lists, by way of payment form, money order form, invoice, offer of correction or similar manner or to offer such registrations directly without unequivocally and also by clear and graphic means pointing out that such advertisement is solely an offer for a contract",
ker se take prakse uporabljajo že vrsto let in so zato povzročile veliko število žrtev ter bistveno oškodovale in izkrivile notranji trg,
whereas such practices have been applied for a number of years, creating numerous victims and significantly damaging and distorting the internal market,
izraža zaskrbljenost nad tem problemom, na katerega so opozorili vlagatelji peticij, saj je očitno široko razširjen, čezmejne narave in ima velik finančni vpliv, še zlasti na mala podjetja;
Expresses its concern at the problem raised by the petitioners, which appears to be widespread and of a cross-border nature and which has a significant financial impact, notably on small businesses;
meni, da so institucije Skupnosti zaradi čezmejne narave tega problema dolžne žrtvam zagotoviti ustrezno pravno varstvo, tako da bi bilo mogoče veljavnost pogodb, sklenjenih na podlagi zavajajočega oglaševanja, učinkovito izpodbijati in jih razveljaviti ter bi lahko žrtve plačani denar dobile povrnjen;
Considers that the cross-border nature of this problem imposes a duty on the Community institutions to provide an adequate remedy to victims, such that the validity of contracts concluded on the basis of misleading advertising can be effectively contested, annulled or terminated, and such that victims may obtain reimbursement of the money paid by them;
poziva žrtve, naj primere poslovnih goljufij prijavijo nacionalnim organom, ter poziva države članice, naj malim in srednjim podjetjem zagotovijo znanje, ki jim bo omogočilo vlaganje pritožb pri vladnih in nevladnih organizacijah, pri tem pa zagotovijo, da bodo komunikacijske poti odprte in da se bodo žrtve zavedale, da je na razpolago svetovanje, tako da se lahko ustrezno posvetujejo, preden poravnajo plačila, ki jih od njih zahtevajo zavajajoča podjetja za imeniške storitve; poziva države članice, naj oblikujejo in vzdržujejo centralizirano zbirko podatkov teh pritožb;
Urges victims to report cases of business scams to national authorities, and calls on Member States to provide small and medium-sized enterprises with the know-how needed in order to enable them to file complaints with governmental and non-governmental authorities, by ensuring that communication pathways are open and that victims are aware that advice is available so that they can seek appropriate guidance before they settle fees demanded from them by misleading business-directory companies; urges Member States to set up and maintain a centralised database of these complaints;
obžaluje, da kljub razširjenosti teh praks zakonodaja EU in nacionalna zakonodaja očitno ne zagotavljata ustrezne zaščite in učinkovitega pravnega varstva ali pa se na nacionalni ravni ne izvajata ustrezno; obžaluje, da očitno tudi nacionalni organi ne morejo zagotoviti pravnega varstva;
Regrets that, despite the widespread nature of these practices, EU and national legislation does not appear to be adequate when it comes to providing a significant means of protection and an effective remedy, or is not being adequately enforced at national level; regrets that national authorities also seem unable to provide a remedy;
z odobravanjem spremlja prizadevanja evropskih in nacionalnih poslovnih združenj za osveščanje njihovih članov in jih poziva, naj ta prizadevanja v sodelovanju z lokalnimi organizacijami okrepijo, da bo žrtev zavajajočih poslovnih imenikov postalo čim manj ljudi; je zaskrbljen, da so zavajajoča podjetja za imeniške storitve nekatere od teh organizacij posledično preganjala na sodišču zaradi domnevnega obrekovanja ali podobnih obtožb, ker so bila navedena v njihovih dejavnostih osveščanja;
Welcomes the efforts made by European and national business organisations to raise awareness among their members, and calls on them to intensify their efforts in collaboration with grass-roots organisations so that fewer people become victims of misleading business-directory practices in the first place; expresses concern that some of these organisations have consequently been pursued through the courts by the misleading business-directory companies specified in their awareness-raising activities on the basis of alleged defamation or similar accusations;
odobrava ukrepe nekaterih držav članic, kot so Italija, Španija, Nizozemska, Belgija in Združeno kraljestvo, zlasti pa Avstrija, pri poskusih odvračanja podjetij za imeniške storitve od zavajajočih praks; vendar meni, da so ta prizadevanja nezadostna in da je še vedno treba usklajevati nadzor na mednarodni ravni;
Welcomes the action taken by certain Member States such as Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom, but most notably by Austria, in trying to prevent business-directory companies from engaging in misleading practices; considers, however, that these efforts remain insufficient and that there is still a need for the coordination of control at an international level;
poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi in evropskimi predstavniškimi združenji podjetij okrepijo prizadevanja za osveščanje o tem problemu, tako da bo s tem seznanjenih več ljudi in se bodo lahko izognili zavajajočemu oglaševanju, ki bi jih utegnilo premamiti v neželene oglaševalske pogodbe;
Calls on the Commission and on Member States to step up their efforts, in full cooperation with national and European business representative organisations, to raise awareness of this problem so that more people are informed and empowered to avoid misleading advertising which can lure them into unwanted advertising contracts;
poziva Komisijo, naj problem poslovnih goljufij obravnava v okviru svoje pobude "Akt za mala podjetja v Evropi", kot je predlagala v svojem sporočilu z naslovom "Enotni trg za Evropo 21. stoletja", ter naj sodeluje z evropsko podjetniško mrežo, mrežo SOLVIT in ustreznimi generalnimi direktorati, ki so lahko dodatno sredstvo za obveščanje in pomoč v zvezi s temi vprašanji,
Calls on the Commission to address the problem of business scams in the context of its "Small Business Act for Europe" initiative, as proposed in its communication entitled "A Single Market for 21st Century Europe", and to engage with the Enterprise Europe Network, the SOLVIT network and the relevant DG portals as a further means of delivering information and assistance regarding these problems;
obžaluje, da Direktiva 2006/114/ES o zavajajočem in primerjalnem oglaševanju, ki se nanaša na poslovanja med podjetji, kot so navedena v zgornjem primeru, očitno ni dovolj, da bi zagotovila učinkovito pravno varstvo, ali pa je države članice ustrezno ne uveljavljajo; poziva Komisijo, naj do decembra 2009 pripravi poročilo o izvedljivosti in mogočih posledicah spremembe Direktive 2006/114/ES, v katero bi vključili "črni" in "sivi" seznam praks, ki veljajo za zavajajoče;
Regrets that Directive 2006/114/EC, which applies to business-to-business transactions such as the one at issue in this case, appears to be either insufficient in terms of providing an effective remedy or inadequately enforced by Member States; requests the Commission to report by December 2009 on the feasibility and possible consequences of amending Directive 2006/114/EC in such a way as to include a "black" or "grey" list of practices that are to be regarded as misleading;
opozarja, da čeprav Komisija nima pristojnosti za neposredno izvajanje Direktive 2006/114/ES proti posameznikom ali podjetjem, pa je njena dolžnost kot varuhinja Pogodbe, da zagotovi primerno in učinkovito izvajanje te direktive v državah članicah; zato Komisijo poziva, naj zagotovi, da bodo države članice v celoti in učinkovito prenesle Direktivo 2005/29/ES, da bo zaščita zagotovljena v vseh državah članicah, ter naj vpliva na obliko razpoložljivih pravnih in postopkovnih orodij kot v primeru Direktive 84/450/EGS, ki je omogočila ustrezna sredstva Avstriji, Španiji in Nizozemski, ter tako izpolni svojo dolžnost varuhinje Pogodbe v smislu zaščite podjetij, pri tem pa zagotovi, da pravica do ustanavljanja in svoboda opravljanja storitev ne bosta prizadeti;
Recalls that, whereas the Commission has no power to enforce Directive 2006/114/EC directly against individuals or companies, it does have the duty, as the guardian of the Treaty, to ensure that that Directive is adequately and effectively implemented by Member States; therefore calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States fully and effectively transpose Directive 2005/29/EC so that protection is guaranteed in all Member States, and to influence the shape of the legal and procedural tools available, as in the case of Directive 84/450/EEC, which provided tools to Austria, Spain and the Netherlands, thereby fulfilling its duty as guardian of the Treaty in terms of protection for businesses whilst ensuring that the right of establishment and freedom to provide services are not impaired;
poziva Komisijo, naj okrepi spremljanje izvajanja Direktive 2006/114/ES, še zlasti v tistih državah članicah, ki so znane kot sedež zavajajočih podjetij za imeniške storitve, predvsem pa v Španiji, kjer ima sedež v peticijah najpogosteje omenjeno podjetje za imeniške storitve, ter na Češkem in Slovaškem, kjer je bila proti žrtvam izrečena sodba, ki zbuja dvom o izvajanju Direktive 2006/114/ES v teh državah; poziva Komisijo, naj Parlamentu poroča o svojih ugotovitvah;
Calls on the Commission to step up its monitoring of the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC, most notably in those Member States where misleading business-directory companies are known to be based, but in particular in Spain, where the business-directory company that is most often named by petitioners is established, and in the Czech Republic and Slovakia where a court judgment has been delivered against victims in a manner which calls into question the implementation of Directive 2006/114/EC in those countries; calls on the Commission to report back to Parliament on its findings;
obžaluje, da Direktiva 2005/29/ES ne zajema poslovanja med podjetji in da se države članice obotavljajo razširiti njeno področje delovanja; vendar pripominja, da lahko države članice enostransko razširijo področje delovanja svoje nacionalne potrošniške zakonodaje na poslovanje med podjetji, ter jih spodbuja, naj to storijo, poleg tega pa naj zagotovijo sodelovanje med organi držav članic, kot je predvideno v Uredbi (ES) št. 2006/2004, da bi omogočili sledenje tovrstnim čezmejnim dejavnostim podjetij za imeniške storitve s sedežem v EU ali v tretjih državah; poleg tega poziva Komisijo, naj do decembra 2009 pripravi poročilo o izvedljivosti in morebitnih posledicah razširitve področja uporabe Direktive 2005/29/ES na pogodbe o poslovanju med podjetji, zlasti, kar zadeva točko 21 njene Priloge I;
Regrets that Directive 2005/29/EC does not cover business-to-business transactions and that Member States appear reluctant to extend its scope; notes, however, that Member States may unilaterally extend the scope of their national consumer legislation to cover business-to-business transactions, and actively encourages them to do so and also to ensure cooperation between Member States' authorities as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 in order to make it possible to track down cross-border activities of this kind engaged in by business-directory companies established within the EU or in a third country; moreover, requests the Commission to report by December 2009 on the feasibility and possible consequences of extending the scope of Directive 2005/29/EC to cover business-to-business contracts with specific regard to point 21 of Annex I thereto;
pozdravlja zgled Avstrije, ki je v nacionalno zakonodajo uvedla posebno prepoved o zavajajočih poslovnih imenikih, in Komisijo poziva, naj zaradi čezmejne narave te težave predloži zakonodajo za razširitev področja uporabe Direktive 2005/29/ES po avstrijskem zgledu, tako da bo izrecno prepovedovala oglaševanje v poslovnih imenikih, če morebitne stranke niso nedvoumno in z jasnimi grafičnimi sredstvi seznanjene, da je tak oglas le ponudba za sklenitev pogodbe o plačljivi storitvi;
Welcomes the example set by Austria, which has introduced a specific prohibition in its national legislation on misleading business directories, and calls on the Commission, in the light of the cross-border nature of this problem, to propose legislation to extend the scope of Directive 2005/29/EC, based on the Austrian model, in a way that specifically prohibits advertising in business directories unless prospective clients are unequivocally and by clear and graphic means informed that such advertisement is solely an offer for a contract against payment;
opaža, da je nacionalna zakonodaja pogosto nezadostna za uporabo pravnih sredstev proti podjetjem za imeniške storitve s sedežem v drugi državi članici, zato Komisijo poziva, naj olajša tesnejše čezmejno sodelovanje med nacionalnimi organi ter jim omogoči, da bodo žrtvam lahko zagotovili učinkovitejše pravno varstvo;
Notes that national legislation is often inadequate to pursue remedies against business-directory companies that are based in other Member States, and therefore urges the Commission to facilitate more active cross-border cooperation among national authorities in order to enable them to provide a more effective remedy to victims;
obžaluje, da se Uredba (ES) št. 2006/2004 ne uporablja za poslovanje med podjetji in se zato nanjo ni mogoče sklicevati kot na sredstvo za boj proti zavajajočim poslovnim imenikom; poziva Komisijo, naj predlaga zakonodajo, da se njena uporaba ustrezno razširi;
Regrets that Regulation (EC) 2006/2004 is not applicable to business-to-business transactions and therefore cannot be relied upon as a means of combating misleading business directories; calls on the Commission to propose legislation to extend its application accordingly;
odobrava zgled Belgije, kjer lahko vsi prizadeti zaradi zavajajočih praks sprožijo sodni postopek v svoji državi bivanja;
Welcomes the example of Belgium, where all those affected by misleading practices are able to take legal action in their country of residence;