natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da bolnikov, ki so organ prejeli nezakonito, ni mogoče izključiti iz sistema zdravstvenega varstva v Evropski uniji; opozarja, da je treba tako kot v drugih primerih kazen za nezakonito ravnanje strogo ločiti od potrebe po zdravljenju;
Emphasises that patients who have received an organ under illegal circumstances cannot be excluded from healthcare in the European Union; points out that as in any other case a distinction should be drawn between the punishment for illegal activity and the need for treatment;
poudarja, da bi države članice morale okrepiti sodelovanje pod okriljem Interpola, da bi se učinkoviteje odzivale na trgovino z organi;
Stresses that the Member States should intensify their cooperation under the auspices of Interpol and Europol in order to address the problem of trafficking in organs more effectively;
priznava, da je zelo pomembno izboljšati kakovost in varnost darovanja ter presajanja organov; poudarja, da bo to vplivalo na zmanjšanje tveganja pri presajanju in zato zmanjšalo škodljive učinke; priznava, da lahko ukrepi v zvezi s kakovostjo in varnostjo vplivajo na razpoložljivost organov in obratno; poziva Komisijo, naj pomaga državam članicam razviti zmogljivosti za vzpostavitev in oblikovanje regulativnih okvirov za izboljšanje kakovosti in varnosti;
Recognises that it is vitally important to improve the quality and safety of organ donation and transplantation; points out that this will have an impact on reducing transplant risks and will consequently reduce adverse effects; acknowledges that actions on quality and safety could have an effect on organ availability and vice versa; asks the Commission to help Member States to develop their capacity in creating and developing regulatory frameworks to enhance quality and safety;
poudarja, da je dobro sodelovanje med zdravstvenimi delavci in nacionalnimi organi ali drugimi zakonitimi organizacijami nujno ter zagotavlja dodano vrednost;
Emphasises that good cooperation between health professionals and national authorities or other legitimised organisations is necessary and provides added value;
priznava, da ima pri uspehu presaditve pomembno vlogo nega bolnika po presaditvi, vključno z ustreznim zdravljenjem proti zavrnitvi organov; priznava, da lahko optimalno zdravljenje proti zavrnitvi prispeva k boljšemu dolgoročnemu zdravju bolnikov, preživetju presadkov in s tem boljši razpoložljivosti organov, saj bi se potreba po ponovnih presaditvah zmanjšala, ter ugotavlja, da morajo države članice bolnikom omogočiti dostop do najboljšega možnega zdravljenja;
Recognises the important role of post-transplantation care, including the appropriate use of anti-rejection therapies, in the success of transplants; acknowledges that optimum use of anti-rejection therapies can lead to improved long-term health for patients, graft survival and, hence, wider availability of organs owing to the reduced need for retransplantation, and asserts that Member States should ensure that patients have access to the best available therapies;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. maja 2010 o institucionalnih vidikih pristopa Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ( 2009/2241(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 19 May 2010 on the institutional aspects of the accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ( 2009/2241(INI) )
ob upoštevanju člena 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, členov 216(2), 218(6), 218(8) in 218(10) Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije in protokola o členu 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji o pristopu Unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (v nadaljevanju EKČP),
having regard to Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union, Articles 216(2), 218(6), 218(8) and 218(10) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Protocol on Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union concerning the accession of the Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereafter referred to as the ECHR),
ob upoštevanju sklepa konference predsednikov z dne 14. januarja 2010, s katero je odobril uporabo člena 50 poslovnika (postopek s pridruženimi odbori) Zapisnik seje konference predsednikov, PE 432.390/CPG, točka 9.1.
having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 14 January 2010 authorising the application of Rule 50 of the Rules of Procedure (procedure with associated committees) Minutes of the meeting of the Conference of Presidents, PE432.390/CPG, point 9.1.
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ustavne zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za civilne svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve in Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A7-0144/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A7-0144/2010 ),
ker Sodišče Evropske unije v svoji sodni praksi že od sodb v zadevi 11-70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft z dne 17. decembra 1970 Sodna praksa 1970, str.
whereas, in case law which has remained consistent since the judgments in Case 11-70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH of 17 December 1970 ECR 1970, p.
in zadevi 4-73 Nold z dne 14. maja 1974 Sodna praksa 1974, str.
and in Case 4-73 Nold of 14 May 1974 ECR 1974, p.
ugotavlja, da tvorijo temeljne pravice bistveni del splošnih načel prava, ki jih Sodišče ščiti,
, the Court of Justice of the European Union has held that fundamental rights form an integral part of the general legal principles which the Court enforces,
ker se Sodišče Evropske unije pri tem opira na skupne ustavne tradicije držav članic in na mednarodne instrumente za zaščito človekovih pravic, h katerim morajo države članice pristopiti, kot na primer EKČP,
whereas in so doing the Court of Justice of the European Union draws its inspiration from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States and from international instruments concerning the protection of human rights to which the Member States have acceded, such as the ECHR,
ker je bilo bistvo te sodne prakse s Pogodbo o Evropski uniji iz Maastrichta leta 1993 vključeno v primarno zakonodajo,
whereas the essence of this case law was incorporated into primary law by the Maastricht Treaty on European Union of 1993,
ker Sodišče Evropske unije namenja posebno pozornost razvoju sodne prakse Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, o čemer priča vse večje število sodb, ki se sklicujejo na določbe EKČP,
whereas the Court of Justice of the European Union devotes particular attention to the development of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, as demonstrated by the growing number of judgments which refer to provisions of the ECHR,
ker Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice načeloma domneva, da je ravnanje države članice skladno z EKČP, kadar ta država le izvaja pravo Unije,
whereas in principle the European Court of Human Rights makes a ‘presumption of compatibility’ of the conduct of a Member State of the Union with the ECHR when the State is merely implementing Union law,
ker je Sodišče Evropske unije v mnenju z dne 28. marca 1996 ugotovilo, da Evropska skupnost ne more pristopiti k EKČP, dokler ne bo spremenjena pogodba in ne bo EU imela eksplicitno ali implicitno pristojnost, da to stori,
whereas, in an opinion of 28 March 1996, the Court of Justice of the European Union found that the European Community could not accede to the ECHR without a previous amendment to the Treaty because the Community did not have an explicit or implicit competence to do so,
ker je treba pri pristopu spoštovati omejitve, ki jih postavlja Lizbonska pogodba in k njej priloženi protokoli, še zlasti člen 6(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in protokol št. 8 k Lizbonski pogodbi; ker te določbe Uniji ne le omogočajo pristop, temveč institucije Unije k temu obvezujejo, ob upoštevanju, da mora sporazum o pristopu Unije k EKČP odražati, da je treba ohraniti posebne značilnosti Unije in njene zakonodaje,
whereas the limits set by the Lisbon Treaty and the Protocols thereto must be upheld at the time of accession and, more specifically, Article 6(2) of the Treaty on European Union and Protocol No 8 to the Lisbon Treaty; whereas these provisions do not merely constitute an option allowing the Union to accede but require the Union institutions to act accordingly, and whereas the agreement on the accession of the Union to the ECHR must reflect the need to retain the specific features of the Union and of Union law,
ker lahko Unija po sklenitvi protokola št. 14 o spremembi EKČP k tej pristopi, kar zadeva države podpisnice EKČP, o pogojih in načinih pristopa pa se morajo dogovoriti Unija na eni strani in države podpisnice EKČP na drugi,
whereas, due to the conclusion of Protocol No 14 amending the ECHR, it is now possible for the Union to accede on behalf of the signatory states to the ECHR and whereas the accession terms and conditions must be agreed at the time of accession between the Union, of the one part, and the signatory states to the ECHR of the other part,
ker bi moral takšen dogovor obravnavati tudi administrativna in tehnična vprašanja, kot je načelo o prispevku Unije k pokrivanju stroškov delovanja Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, ker je treba v tem okviru predvideti vzpostavitev samostojnega proračuna Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice, da se olajša ocenjevanje posameznih prispevkov,
whereas such an agreement should also deal with administrative and technical issues, such as the principle of a contribution from the Union to the operating costs of the European Court of Human Rights; whereas in that context plans should be made to establish an autonomous budget for the European Court of Human Rights to facilitate assessment of the various contributions,
ker bi bila Unija s pristopom k EKČP vključena v njen sistem varovanja temeljnih pravic in bi imela poleg notranje zaščite teh pravic s sodno prakso Sodišča Evropske unije na voljo tudi zunanji organ za zunanjo zaščito, ki je mednarodnega značaja,
whereas, as a result of acceding to the ECHR, the Union will be integrated into its fundamental rights protection system and, in addition to the internal protection of these rights by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, will have the benefit of an external protection body which is international in character,
ker EKČP ni bila razvita le z dodatnimi protokoli, temveč tudi z uporabo drugih konvencij, listin in sporazumov, s katerimi se je vzpostavil sistem varovanja človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, ki se stalno razvija,
whereas the ECHR has been developed not only through the additional Protocols, but also through other Conventions, Charters and Agreements, resulting into a continuously evolving system of protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms,
poudarja glavne utemeljitve v prid pristopa Unije k EKČP, ki jih je mogoče povzeti sledeče:
Stresses the main arguments in favour of accession of the Union to the ECHR, which may be summarised as follows:
pristop predstavlja napredek v procesu evropskega povezovanja in hkrati korak naprej k uresničitvi politične Unije,
accession constitutes a move forward in the process of European integration and involves one further step towards political Union
medtem ko je Unija svoj sistem zaščite temeljnih pravic dokončno oblikovala in okrepila z vključitvijo Listine o temeljnih pravicah v svojo primarno zakonodajo, pa bi bil njen pristop k EKČP vidno znamenje njene povezanosti z državami, ki so članice Sveta Evrope, in z njegovim vseevropskim sistemom na področju človekovih pravic; ta pristop bi okrepil tudi verodostojnost Unije v njenem odnosu do tretjih držav, ki jih na dvostranski ravni vedno poziva k spoštovanju EKČP,
while the Union's system for the protection of fundamental rights will be supplemented and enhanced by the incorporation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into its primary law, its accession to the ECHR will send a strong signal concerning the coherence between the Union and the countries belonging to the Council of Europe and its pan-European human rights system; this accession will also enhance the credibility of the Union in the eyes of third countries which it regularly calls upon in its bilateral reports to respect the ECHR,
uskladitev pravnih redov Unije in EKČP na področju človekovih pravic v zakonodaji in sodni praksi bo prispevala k skladnemu razvoju dveh evropskih sodišč na področju človekovih pravic, še zlasti ker bosta dialog in sodelovanje postala še bolj potrebna, ter se bo tako vzpostavil celovit sistem, v katerem bosta sodišči usklajeno delovali,
legislative and case law harmonisation in the field of human rights of the rule of law of the EU and the ECHR will contribute to the harmonious development of the two European courts in the field of human rights, particularly because of the increased need for dialogue and cooperation, and thus will create an integral system, in which the two courts will function in synchrony,
pristop bo do neke mere tudi nadomestilo za to, da je pristojnost Sodišča Evropske unije v zadevah s področja zunanje in varnostne politike ter policijskega sodelovanja in varnostne politike nekoliko omejena, saj bo zagotovil koristen zunanji sodni nadzor nad vsemi dejavnostmi EU,
accession will also compensate to some extent for the fact that the scope of the Court of Justice of the European Union is somewhat constrained in the matters of foreign and security policy and police and security policy by providing useful external judicial supervision of all EU activities,
pristop ne bo v nobenem primeru ogrozil avtonomnosti prava Unije, saj bo Sodišče Evropske unije ostalo vrhovni sodnik za vprašanja v zvezi s pravom Unije in veljavnostjo njenih aktov; Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice je treba obravnavati le kot organ, ki bo izvajal zunanji nadzor nad tem, kako Unija izvršuje obveznosti mednarodnega prava, ki izhajajo iz njenega pristopa k EKČP; pri odnosu med dvema evropskima sodnima prisojnostma ne gre za hierarhijo, temveč specializacijo; Sodišče Evropske unije bo tako imeli enak položaj, kot ga imajo sedaj v odnosu do Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice vrhovna sodišča držav članic;
accession will not in any way call into question the principle of the autonomy of the Union's law, as the Court of Justice of the European Union will remain the sole supreme court adjudicating on issues relating to EU law and the validity of the Union's acts, as the European Court of Human Rights must be regarded not only as a superior authority but rather as a specialised court exercising external supervision over the Union's compliance with obligations under international law arising from its accession to the ECHR; the relationship between the two European courts shall not be hierarchical but rather a relationship of specialisation; thus the Court of Justice of the European Union will have a status analogous to that currently enjoyed by the supreme courts of the Member States in relation to the European Court of Human Rights;
opozarja, da skladno s členom 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in protokolom št. 8 pristop ne prinaša razširitve pristojnosti Unije, ne uvaja njene splošne pristojnosti na področju človekovih pravic ter ne vpliva na pristojnosti institucij Unije, in da je v skladu s členoma 4(2) in 6(3) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji treba ohranjati spoštovanje ustavne tradicije in identitete držav članic;
Recalls that, pursuant to Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union and Protocol No 8, accession does not entail any extension of the powers of the Union and in particular does not create a general human rights competence for the Union, and that, pursuant to Article 4(2) and Article 6(3) of the Treaty on European Union, the Member States' traditions and constitutional identities must be respected;
potrjuje, da mora sporazum o pristopu Unije k EKČP v skladu s členom 2 protokola št. 8 k Lizbonski pogodbi zagotoviti, da pristop ne bo vplival na posebni položaj držav članic v odnosu do EKČP in na njene protokole na splošno ter na morebitna odstopanja in zadržke držav članic ter da nadalje takšne okoliščine ne smejo vplivati na položaj Unije v odnosu do EKČP;
Notes that, pursuant to Article 2 of Protocol No 8 to the Lisbon Treaty, the agreement on the accession of the Union to the ECHR must ensure that accession will not affect the particular internal situation of the Member States in relation to the ECHR and its protocols in general and with regard to any derogations and reservations made by Member States in particular, and that such circumstances should not influence the position taken by the Union in relation to the ECHR;
ugotavlja, da je bil sistem EKČP dopolnjen z nizom dodatnih protokolov v zvezi z varovanjem pravic, ki niso predmet EKČP, in priporoča, da se Komisiji podeli mandat za pogajanje o pristopu k vsem protokolom, ki se nanašajo na pravice, ki se ujemajo z Listino o temeljnih pravicah, in to neodvisno od njihove ratifikacije s strani držav članic Unije;
Observes that the ECHR system has been supplemented by a series of additional protocols concerning the protection of rights which are not covered by the ECHR and recommends that the Commission be mandated also to negotiate accession to all the protocols concerning rights corresponding to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, regardless of whether they have been ratified by the Member States of the Union;
poudarja, da je treba pristop EU k EKČP z ozirom na dejstvo, da gre za pristop nedržavne strani k pravnemu instrumentu, ustanovljenemu za države, izpeljati brez spreminjanja lastnosti EKČP in s čim manj spremembami pravnega sistema; meni, da je pomembno in v interesu strank iz Evropske unije in tretjih držav, ki iščejo pravico pred sodiščem, da se da prednost tistim pristopnim ureditvam, ki bodo najmanj obremenile Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;
Stresses that, as the accession of EU to the ECHR is an accession of a non-State Party to a legal instrument created for States, it should be completed without altering the features of the ECHR and modifications to its judicial system should be kept to a minimum; considers it important, in the interests of those in both the Union and third countries who are seeking justice, to give preference to accession arrangements that will have the least impact on the workload of the European Court of Human Rights;
poudarja, da je vzporedno s politično zavezanostjo, ključno, da se najdejo ustrezni odgovori in rešitve za glavna tehnična vprašanja, tako da bo lahko pristop EU k EKČP uporabljen v korist državljanov; opaža, da lahko nerešene in nejasne podrobnosti povzročijo zmedo in ogrozijo sam cilj pristopa; vseeno poudarja, da tehnične ovire ne semjo upočasniti procesa;
Emphasises that, in tandem with the necessary political commitment, it is of the utmost importance that adequate answers and solutions be found to the main technical questions in order to enable the EU's accession to the ECHR to be used for the benefit of citizens; points out that unresolved and unclear details may create confusion and endanger the very purpose of the accession; stresses, however, that technical impediments should not be allowed to delay the process;
poudarja, da Unija s pristopom k EKČP ne postaja članica Sveta Evrope, vendar je njena udeležba pri organih konvencije v določeni meri potrebna, da bi zagotovili njeno uspešno vključitev v sistem EKČP in da bi Unija s tem pridobila določene pravice, še zlasti:
Stresses that accession to the ECHR does not make the Union a member of the Council of Europe but that a degree of participation by the Union in the ECHR bodies is necessary in order to ensure proper integration of the Union into the ECHR system and that, therefore, the Union should have certain rights in this domain, particularly:
pravico do predložitve seznama treh kandidatov za mesto sodnika, izmed katerih enega kot predstavnika Unije izvoli parlamentarna skupščina Sveta Evrope; ta sodnik ima v skladu s členom 27(2) EKČP pri delu Sodišča enakopravno vlogo kot drugi sodniki; Evropski parlament se vključi v pripravo seznama kandidatov, skladno s podobnim postopkom, kot ga predvideva člen 255 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije za kandidate za sodnike Sodišča EU,
the right to submit a list of three candidates for the post of judge, one of whom is elected by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on behalf of the Union and participates in the work of the Court on a footing of equality with the other judges, pursuant to Article 27(2) of the ECHR; the European Parliament being involved either in drawing up the list of candidates in line with a procedure similar to that provided for in Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for candidates for the position of judge at the Court of Justice of the European Union,
pravico, da se z volilno pravico v imenu Evropske unije prek Evropske komisije udeležuje sej Odbora ministrov, kadar ta opravlja funkcijo organa za nadzor nad izvrševanjem sodb Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice ali kadar odloča o primernosti naslovitve prošnje za mnenje na Sodišče, ter da je zastopana v Odboru direktorjev za človekove pravice (podorgan Odbora ministrov),
the right to attend via the European Commission, with voting rights on behalf of the EU, meetings of the Committee of Ministers when it performs its task of monitoring the execution of judgments given by the European Court of Human Rights or when it decides on the desirability of seeking an opinion from the Court and the right to be represented on the Steering Committee for Human Rights (a subsidiary body of the Committee of Ministers),
pravico Evropskega parlamenta, da imenuje/pošlje določeno število svojih predstavnikov v generalno skupščino Sveta Evrope, kadar ta voli sodnike Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice;
the right of the European Parliament to appoint/send a certain number of representatives to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe when the latter elects judges to the European Court of Human Rights;
meni, da bi si morale države članice v medsebojnih odnosih in v odnosih z Unijo po pristopu k EKČP prizadevati, da se ne bi zatekale k meddržavnim pritožbam zaradi domnevnega neizpolnjevanja obveznosti po členu 33 EKČP, kadar bi dejanje ali opustitev dejanja, ki je predmet spora, sodilo v področje uporabe zakonodaje Unije, saj to ne bi bilo v skladu s členom 344 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije;
Considers that the Member States should undertake, at the time of accession to the ECHR, with respect to one another and in their mutual relations with the Union, not to bring interstate applications concerning an alleged failure of compliance pursuant to Article 33 of the ECHR when the act or omission in dispute falls within the scope of Union law, as this would be contrary to Article 344 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
ocenjuje, da je poglavitna dodana vrednost pristopa EU k EKČP možnost pritožbe posameznika zoper dejanja institucij in držav članic pri izvajanju zakonodaje Unije in da bi posledično morala biti vsaka pritožba pravne ali fizične osebe glede določenega dejanja ali njegove opustitve s strani institucije ali organa Unije uperjena izključno proti Uniji; enako bi morala biti vsaka pritožba, katere predmet je akt države članice, s katerim ta izvaja pravo Unije, uperjena samo proti tej državi članici, je pa lahko uperjena proti Uniji in državi članici hkrati, kadar obstaja dvom glede delitve odgovornosti med njima;
Considers that the principal added value of the accession of the EU to the ECHR lies in recourse for individuals against acts by means of which the law of the Union is implemented by its institutions or the Member States and that consequently any application by a natural or legal person concerning an act or failure to act by an institution or body of the Union should be directed solely against the latter and that similarly any application concerning a measure by means of which a Member State implements the law of the Union should be directed solely against the Member State, without prejudice to the principle that, where there might be any doubt about the way in which responsibility is shared, an application may be brought simultaneously against the Union and the Member State;