je seznanjen z različnimi možnostmi upravljanja dodatnih prihodkov iz naslova obdavčitve finančnega sektorja na nacionalni in evropski ravni; poudarja, da je treba rešiti vprašanje, v kakšen namen bi se uporabljali prihodki, ustvarjeni z davkom na finančne transakcije, in da je treba ovrednotenje različnih možnosti in prednostno izbiro med njimi obravnavati kot bistven element v splošni razpravi o inovativnem financiranju, da bi davkoplačevalcem primerno predstavili logiko dodatne obdavčitve finančnega sektorja; poudarja, da bi se glede na njegovo globalno naravo moral prihodek, ustvarjen z globalnim davkom na finančne transakcije, uporabljati za financiranje ciljev globalne politike, kot so razvoj in zmanjšanje revščine v državah v razvoju ter boj proti podnebnim spremembam; je seznanjen s prizadevanji Komisije za povečanje proračuna EU z inovativnimi finančnimi instrumenti; je prepričan, da bi lahko za zagotovitev evropske dodane vrednosti omenjenih inovativnih finančnih instrumentov del teh prihodkov dodelili za financiranje projektov in politik EU; opozarja, da je v nedavnem sporočilu Komisije o pregledu proračuna EU obdavčitev finančnega sektorja v EU obravnavana kot možen vir lastnih sredstev; poziva institucije EU, nacionalne parlamente, deležnike EU in predstavnike civilne družbe k obsežni razpravi o izbiri glede teh politik, določitvi deleža prihodkov, ki bo dodeljen na ravni EU in nacionalni ravni, in o različnih načinih izvedbe; ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba glede upravljanja z deleži prihodkov, dodeljenih na nacionalni ravni, oceniti vse možnosti, vključno z dodeljevanjem prihodkov za utrditev javnih financ;
Is aware of different options for the management of the additional revenues generated by the taxation of the financial sector at both national and European level; stresses that, the question regarding the purpose for which the revenues raised by an FTT should be used needs to be resolved and that, in order to give taxpayers a proper picture of the rationale behind additional financial sector taxation, the assessment of and prioritisation among different options should be seen as an essential element in the overall debate on innovative financing; stresses that, owing to its global nature, the revenue raised by a global FTT should be used to provide financing for global policy goals, such as development and poverty reduction in developing countries and the fight against climate change; notes the Commission's aim to increase the volume of the EU budget through the use of innovative financial instruments; is convinced that in order to safeguard the European added value of the aforementioned innovative financing tools a part of those revenues could be allocated to finance EU projects and policies; recalls that the Commission's recent Communication on a review of the EU budget regards EU taxation of the financial sector as a possible source of own resources; calls for a broad debate involving the EU institutions, national parliaments, EU stakeholders and civil society representatives on the choices available regarding those policies, the shares of revenue to be allocated at EU and national level and the various ways of achieving this; notes, with regard to the management of the share of the revenue allocated at national level, that all possible options should be evaluated, including the allocation of revenue to consolidate public finances;