natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračunski nadzor in mnenja Odbora za svoboščine in pravice državljanov, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0013/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0013/2005 ),
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu, Komisiji in vladam ter parlamentom držav članic in Švicarske konfederacije.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Swiss Confederation.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o podpisu in sklenitvi Sporazuma o sodelovanju s Kneževino Andoro v imenu Evropske skupnosti ( KOM(2004)0456 – C6-0214/2004 – 2004/0136(AVC))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the signature and conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of a Cooperation Agreement with the Principality of Andorra ( COM(2004)0456 – C6-0214/2004 – 2004/0136(AVC))
ob upoštevanju predloga Sklepa Sveta ( KOM(2004)0456 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the proposal for a Council decision ( COM(2004)0456 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju osnutka sporazuma o sodelovanju med Evropsko skupnostjo in Kneževino Andoro,
having regard to the draft Cooperation Agreement between the European Community and the Principality of Andorra,
ob upoštevanju prošnje Sveta za privolitev Parlamenta v skladu z drugim pododstavkom člena 300(3) skupaj s členom 310 Pogodbe ES ( C6-0214/2004 ),
having regard to the request for assent submitted by the Council pursuant to Article 300(3), second subparagraph, in conjunction with Article 310 of the EC Treaty ( C6-0214/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju členov 75 in 83(7) svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 75 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju priporočila Odbora za zunanje zadeve ( A6-0014/2005 ),
having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( A6-0014/2005 ),
da privolitev k sklenitvi sporazuma;
Gives its assent to conclusion of the agreement;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj stališče Parlamenta posreduje Svetu in Komisiji ter vladam in parlamentom držav članic ter Kneževine Andore.
Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Principality of Andorra.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o predlogu Sklepa Sveta o izmenjavi podatkov, izpisanih iz kazenske evidence ( KOM(2004)0664 – C6-0163/2004 – 2004/0238(CNS))
European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the exchange of information extracted from the criminal record ( COM(2004)0664 – C6-0163/2004 – 2004/0238(CNS))
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije ( KOM(2004)0664 ) Še ni objavljeno v Uradnem listu.
having regard to the Commission proposal ( COM(2004)0664 ) Not yet published in OJ.
ob upoštevanju členov 31 in 34(2)(c) Pogodbe EU,
having regard to Articles 31 and 34(2)(c) of the EU Treaty,
ob upoštevanju člena 39(1) Pogodbe EU, v skladu s katerim se je Svet posvetoval s Parlamentom ( C6-0163/2004 ),
having regard to Article 39(1) of the EU Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament ( C6-0163/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0020/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0020/2005 ),
poziva Komisijo, naj na podlagi člena 250(2) Pogodbe ES ustrezno spremeni svoj predlog;
Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;
Besedilo, ki ga predlaga Komisija Spremembe Parlamenta Sprememba 1 Člen 3
Text proposed by the Commission Amendments by Parliament Amendment 1 Article 3
Vsak osrednji organ
Each central authority shall
držav članic, evidentiranih v nacionalni kazenski evidenci
and of relevant subsequent entries in the criminal record
Sprememba 2 Člen 4, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 2 Article 4, paragraph 2 2.
delovnih dni od prejema zahtevka pod pogoji, ki jih določa nacionalna zakonodaja, na temelju obrazca za odgovor B, ki je priložen temu sklepu.
from the receipt of the request, under the conditions provided for by national law, by the central authority of the requested Member State to the central authority of the requesting Member State on the basis of reply form B annexed hereto.
v 48 urah v nujnih primerih, drugače pa
48 hours in urgent cases and otherwise within
v roku, ki ne presega
a period not exceeding
Sprememba 3 Člen 4, odstavek 3 3.
Amendment 3 Article 4, paragraph 3 3.
vpisanih v kazenski evidenci
entered in the criminal record
Sprememba 4 Člen 5, odstavek 1, točka (b)
Amendment 4 Article 5, paragraph 1, point (b)
(b) za druge namene v mejah, ki jih določi
(b) for other purposes within the limits specified by the
država, in v skladu z nacionalno zakonodajo države prosilke.
Member State and in accordance with national law of the requesting Member State.
(b) za druge namene v mejah, ki jih
(b) for other purposes within the limits specified
na obrazcu
on the form
prosilka in jih potrdi zaprošena država članica
and approved by the requested Member State
Sprememba 5 Člen 5, odstavek 2 2.
Amendment 5 Article 5, paragraph 2 2.
lahko zaprosi
may ask
da jo obvesti o
to inform it of
uporabi teh podatkov.
the use made of it.
Kadar so osebni podatki posredovani v skladu z odstavkom 1(b) tega člena, država članica
Where personal data is transmitted under paragraph 1(b) of this Article, the requested Member State
prosilka obvesti zaprošeno
shall be informed by
državo članico
the requesting Member State
uporabe teh podatkov.
the use made of it.
Sprememba 6 Člen 5, odstavek 3a (novo)
Amendment 6 Article 5, paragraph 3a (new)
Konvencija Sveta Evrope o varstvu posameznikov glede avtomatske obdelave osebnih podatkov z dne 28. januarja 1981 in člen 23 Konvencije o medsebojni pravni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije
The Council of Europe Convention of 28 January 1981 on the protection of individuals with regard to the automatic processing of personal data and Article 23 of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on mutual assistance in criminal matters between the Member States of the European Union
z dne 29. maja 2000 se uporabita za ta člen.
shall apply to this Article.
UL C 197, 12.7.2000, str.
OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p.
najpozneje 30. junija 2005
no later than 30 June 2005
Sprememba 8 Obrazec A, točka (a), tretja alinea
Amendment 8 Form A, point (a), item 3
ob upoštevanju predloga priporočila Svetu, ki ga predlaga António Costa v imenu Skupine PSE o kakovosti kazenskega pravosodja v Evropski uniji ( B6-0234/2004 ),
having regard to the proposal for a recommendation to the Council by António Costa, on behalf of the PSE Group, on the quality of criminal justice in the European Union ( B6-0234/2004 ),
ob upoštevanju Mednarodnega pakta o državljanskih in političnih pravicah, ki ga je tudi sprejela Generalna skupščina v svoji resoluciji 2200 A (XXI) dne 16. decembra 1966 in je začel veljati 23. marca 1976, zlasti členov 2, 7, 9, 10 in 14 Pakta,
having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights adopted by the United Nations General Assembly in its resolution 2200 A (XXI) of 16 December 1966, which entered into force on 23 March 1976, and in particular Articles 2, 7, 9, 10 and 14 thereof,
ob upoštevanju Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin z dne 4. novembra 1950 (EKČP), ki je začela veljati 3. septembra 1953, in zlasti členov 6 in 13 Konvencije,
having regard to the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 (ECHR), which entered into force on 3 September 1953, and in particular Articles 6 and 13 thereof,
ob upoštevanju naslova VI Pogodbe o Evropski uniji, in zlasti členov 29, 31(1)(c) ter 34(2)(a) in (b) Pogodbe,
having regard to Title VI of the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 29, 31(1)(c) and 34(2)(a) and (b),
ob upoštevanju Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo, ki so jo države članice podpisale v Rimu dne 29. oktobra 2004, še zlasti njenih členov I-42 in III-260 (mehanizmi ocenjevanja), III-270 in III-271 (pravosodno sodelovanje v kazenskih zadevah) ter od II-107 do II-110, ki povzemajo člene od 47 do 50 Listine o temeljnih pravicah Evropske unije,
having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed by the Member States in Rome on 29 October 2004, and in particular Articles I-42 and III-260 (evaluation mechanisms), III-270 and III-271 (judicial cooperation in criminal matters), and II-107 to II-110, which take over the provisions of Articles 47 to 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
ob upoštevanju pravnega reda Skupnosti na področju kazenskega pravosodja, še zlasti Konvencije o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah Akt Sveta z dne 29. maja 2000 o sklenitvi - v skladu s členom 34 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji - Konvencije o medsebojni pomoči v kazenskih zadevah med državami članicami Evropske unije (UL C 197, 12.7.2000, str.
having regard to the Community "acquis" in the field of criminal justice, in particular the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Council Act of 29 May 2000 establishing in accordance with Article 34 of the Treaty on European Union the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union (OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, p.
, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/584/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o evropskem pripornem nalogu in postopkih izročitve med državami članicami UL L 190, 18.7.2002, str.
, the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.
, Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2003/577/PNZ z dne 22. julija 2003 o o izvrševanju sklepov o zasegu premoženja ali dokazov v Evropski uniji UL L 196, 2.8.2003, str.
, Council Framework Decision 2003/577/JHA of 22 July 2003 on the execution in the European Union of orders freezing property or evidence OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, p.
, predloga Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o evropskem dokaznem nalogu za pridobivanje predmetov, listin in podatkov za uporabo v kazenskih postopkih ( KOM(2003)0688 ) in predloga Okvirnega sklepa Sveta o določenih procesnih pravicah v kazenskih postopkih na celotnem območju Evropske unije ( KOM(2004)0328 ),
, the proposal for a Council framework decision on the European Evidence Warrant for obtaining objects, documents and data for use in proceedings in criminal matters ( COM(2003)0688 ) and the proposal for a Council framework decision on certain procedural rights in criminal proceedings throughout the European Union ( COM(2004)0328 ),
ob upoštevanju členov Pristopne pogodbe, ki predvidevajo možnost prekinitve izvajanja nekaterih določb na področju svobode, varnosti in pravice v primeru neupoštevanja nekaterih norm (norme morajo biti vnaprej določene),
having regard to the relevant articles of the Treaty of Accession providing for the possibility of suspending the application of certain provisions of the area of freedom, security and justice in the event of failure to comply with certain rules (which requires that such rules are defined beforehand),
ob upoštevanju Priporočila o prihodnosti območja svobode, varnosti in pravice ter o pogojih za krepitev njegove legitimnosti in učinkovitosti, ki ga je Evropski parlament sprejel 14. oktobra 2004 Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2004)0022.
having regard to its recommendation of 14 October 2004 to the Council and to the European Council on the future of the area of freedom, security and justice as well as on the measures required to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness thereof Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2004)0022.
ob upoštevanju Haaškega programa, ki ga je sprejel Evropski svet na zasedanju v Bruslju dne 4. in 5. novembra 2004,
having regard to the Hague Programme adopted by the European Council at its meeting in Brussels on 4-5 November 2004,
ob upoštevanju členov 114(3) in 83(5) svojega Poslovnika
having regard to Rules 114(3) and 83(5) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ( A6-0036/2005 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs ( A6-0036/2005 ),
ker členi od II-107 do II-110 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo ter člena 6 in 13 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin določajo obseg "pravice do sodnega varstva", ki jo mora Unija in njene države članice v skladu s svojimi pristojnostmi zagotavljati evropskim državljanom,
whereas Articles II-107 to II-110 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe and Articles 6 and 13 of the ECHR define the scope of the "right to justice" which the Union and its Member States, each within its jurisdiction, must guarantee EU citizens,
ker pravica do sodnega varstva vsebuje še zlasti pravico do učinkovitega pravnega sredstva, do nepristranskega sojenja, do pravičnega sojenja, do sojenja v razumnem roku, pravico do pravne pomoči ter vključuje tudi upoštevanju temeljnih pravic osumljenih oseb pred začetkom kazenskega postopka kot tudi pravico do dostojne in humane obravnave obsojenih oseb ob koncu postopka v skladu z mednarodnimi standardi OZN in standardi Evropske konvencije o preprečevanju mučenja in nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja,
whereas this right to justice includes, in particular, the right to an effective remedy, the right of access to an impartial tribunal, the right to a fair trial, the right to be tried within a reasonable time and the right to access to legal aid, as well as full respect for the fundamental rights of persons suspected of an offence prior to criminal proceedings and the right to respectful and humane treatment, pursuant to the international standards of the UN and of the European Convention on the prevention of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, for convicted persons following such proceedings,
ker je zaščita teh pravic še pomembnejša v kazenskih postopkih, ki zadevajo temeljne pravice,
whereas protection of these rights is all the more essential in criminal proceedings, in which fundamental freedoms are at stake,
ker je to varstvo v prvi vrsti odvisno od pristojnosti vsake države članice, ki ga ta zagotavlja v skladu s svojo ustavno ureditvijo in pravno tradicijo; ker morajo države članice poiskati rešitve za težave, ki obstajajo v njihovih pravnih sistemih, predvsem za tiste, na katere je opozorilo Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice; ker resnično evropsko območje svobode, varnosti in pravice zahteva, da je treba svojim državljanom zagotoviti podobno obravnavo po vsej Uniji ter krepiti medsebojno zaupanje med državami članicami, da bodo vzajemno priznavale sodbe ter tudi izročale svoje državljane sodiščem druge države,
whereas responsibility for protecting these rights lies first and foremost with each Member State, which does so in accordance with its own constitutional set-up and legal traditions; whereas Member States need to deal with the problems existing in their own legal systems, especially those identified by the European Court of Human Rights; whereas, however, a genuine European area of freedom, security and justice must guarantee European citizens comparable treatment throughout the Union and requires greater mutual trust between Member States with a view to mutual recognition of judicial decisions, including even the surrender of their own citizens to the courts of another Member State,
ob upoštevanju tako sodne prakse Sodišča Evropskih skupnosti v Luksemburgu kakor tudi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice v Strasbourgu in dejstva, da morata biti sodni praksi obeh sodišč skladni;
E having regard to the case law of the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg and of the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and the fact that the case law of both courts should be consistent,
ker je po sprejemu programa iz Tampereja (odstavek 33) načelo medsebojnega priznavanja sodb sodišč postalo temeljni kamen pravosodnega sodelovanja v Uniji,
F whereas, since the adoption of the Tampere programme (paragraph 33), the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions has become a cornerstone of judicial cooperation within the Union,
ker Pogodba o Ustavi za Evropo (člen III-260) in Haaški program (še posebej njegov odstavek 3.2) priznavata pomen vzajemnega ocenjevanja med državami članicami za krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja, ki je potrebno za vzajemno priznavanje, kot to velja za sprejetje minimalnih vsebinskih in postopkovnih standardov in postavljanje razumnih časovnih rokov;
whereas the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (Article III-260) and the Hague Programme (in particular paragraph 3.2 thereof) recognise the importance of mutual evaluation between Member States in order to strengthen mutual trust, which is a precondition for mutual recognition, as is the adoption of minimum substantive and procedural standards and the setting of reasonable time-limits,
ker mora ocenjevanje kakovosti sodstva v EU zadevati tudi metode dela sodnikov in različne pravosodne sisteme v državah članicah; s čimer se ne sme spodbijati primernega spoštovanju neodvisnosti pravosodnih oblasti,
whereas the evaluation of the quality of justice in the EU should also concern the working methods of the judges and the different systems of administration of justice in the Member States; whereas this does not contradict the notion of due respect for the principle of the independence of the judiciary,
ker mora to ocenjevanje temeljiti na skupnem referenčnem okvirju, ki zagotavlja njegovo skladnost in objektivnost,
whereas this evaluation needs to be grounded in a common framework of reference which can guarantee its coherence and objectivity,
ker je za kakovost kazenskega pravosodja v Evropi treba določiti najustreznejša orodja in postopke takega ocenjevanja in pospeševati izmenjavo informacij ter možnosti usposabljanja,
whereas the most appropriate tools and procedures need to be defined for the purposes of this evaluation and in order to step up exchanges of information and training opportunities in support of the quality of criminal justice in Europe,
ker so bile v zadnjih letih v EU ustanovljene različne evropske mreže, kot so Združenje državnih svetov in vrhovnih upravnih enot, Mreža predsednikov vrhovnih sodišč, Mreža vrhovnih sodišč in Evropska mreža višjih upravnih sodišč, kar priča o rastočem zavedanju potrebe za skupno delovanje pri izboljšanju kakovosti sodstva, ki je na razpolago državljanom Unije,
whereas the creation within the EU in recent years of European networks, such as the Association of Councils of State and Supreme Administrative Jurisdictions, the Network of Supreme Court Presidents, the Network of Supreme Courts and the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, testifies to the growing awareness of the need to work together in order to improve the quality of the justice offered to the Union's citizens,
ob upoštevanju ključne vloge, ki jo ima pri razvoju skupne pravne kulture in kulture temeljnih pravic v Uniji usposabljanje, predvsem preko delovanja Evropske mreže za pravno usposabljanje,
having regard to the key role played by training in developing a common legal culture and a culture of fundamental rights within the Union, in particular via the actions of the European judicial training network,
ker mora izboljšanje kakovosti pravosodja na podlagi ocenjevanja po eni strani voditi h krepitvi kakovosti kazenskih in postopkovnih norm ter po drugi strani h krepitvi kakovosti njihove uporabe, s čimer se ne sme spodbijati pojma primernega spoštovanju neodvisnosti pravosodnih oblasti,
whereas the improvement of the quality standards of justice and of its efficiency on the basis of the evaluation must enhance both the quality of substantive and procedural criminal provisions and the quality of their implementation, which is not in contradiction with due respect for the principle of the independence of the judiciary,
ker je za vzajemno ocenjevanje potrebna specifična metodologija, ki upošteva zapletenost tega procesa,
whereas mutual evaluation requires a specific methodology, taking into account the complexity of the process,
ker Haaški program priznava, da je potrebno sprejeti Pogodbo o Ustavi za Evropo kot referenčni okvir in začeti s pripravljalnimi deli, da se bodo v Ustavni pogodbi predvideni ukrepi lahko izvajali, ko bo stopila v veljavo,
whereas the Hague Programme acknowledges the need to adopt the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe as a reference framework and to begin the preparatory work to ensure that the measures provided for in the Constitutional Treaty can be implemented as soon as it enters into force,
ker upošteva javni seminar, ki ga je organiziral Odbor za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve dne 18. januarja 2005 o spodbujanju kakovostnejšega pravosodja v Evropi,
having regard to the public seminar held by its Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on 18 January 2005 on promoting enhanced quality of justice in Europe,
ob odobritvi smernic Haaškega programa za krepitev vzajemnega zaupanja (odstavek 3.2), predvsem preko izboljšanja kakovosti pravosodja, razvoja ocenjevanja ter preko neprecenljivih prispevkov pravosodnih institucij in organizacij,
approving the guidelines of the Hague Programme concerning the strengthening of mutual trust (paragraph 3.2.), especially by improving the quality of justice, by developing evaluation and by means of the invaluable contribution of the networks of legal institutions and organisations,
naslovi na Evropski svet in Svet naslednja priporočila:
Addresses the following recommendations to the European Council and the Council:
da takoj začneta z akcijo Evropske unije, da bodo evropski državljani v Uniji ne glede na pravni in ustavni okvir države, v kateri se nahajajo, lahko deležni pravice do sodnega varstva v pogojih, ki so primerljivi in ustrezajo visokim standardom kakovosti, s čimer bi pridobili večje zaupanje v pravosodje;
immediately initiate a European Union action to enable European citizens throughout the Union, whatever the legal and constitutional set-up of the Member State in which they find themselves, to enjoy the right to justice in both comparable conditions and on the basis of ever-higher quality standards, thus acquiring greater trust in the administration of justice,
meni, da je v tem pogledu pomembno, da Evropska unija z državami članicami opredeli "Listino o kakovosti kazenskega pravosodja v Evropi ", ki bo predstavljala skupni referenčni okvir za vse države članice in bo zagotavljala skladno in objektivno ocenjevanje; pri pripravi te listine bo potrebno upoštevati izkušnje in že opravljeno delo na nacionalni ravni kot tudi delo Sveta Evrope in Združenih narodov na mednarodni ravni;
define with the Member States a 'Quality Charter for Criminal Justice in Europe' to serve as a common reference framework for all the Member States and ensure consistent and objective evaluation; this Charter should be drawn up taking due account of the experiences acquired and work done at national level, as well as at international level by the Council of Europe and the United Nations,