natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
D. ker EU v svoji zunanji politiki sledi splošnemu pristopu, ki temelji na dialogu in podpori, ne pa na osamitvi, na Kubi pa delujejo številne evropske razvojne agencije in ustanove,
D. whereas in its external policy the EU follows a general approach based on dialogue and support, rather than isolation, and whereas numerous European development agencies and foundations are active in Cuba,
3. ponavlja, da je svoboda izražanja in obveščanja temeljna pravica, v zadnjih skoraj dveh desetletjih pa je internet postal eno najpomembnejših orodij za njeno zagotovitev; poziva Komisijo, naj ponudi svojo finančno in tehnično pomoč, da bi zagotovila, da bodo imeli državljani Kube dostop do interneta;
Reiterates that freedom of expression and information is a fundamental right and that over almost two decades the Internet has become one of the most important tools to guarantee freedom of expression and information; calls on the Commission to offer its financial and technical support with a view to ensuring that all Cuban citizens have access to the Internet;
5. meni, da sedanji embargo nikakor ne prispeva k takemu napredku in poziva vse udeležene strani, naj se vzdržijo uvajanja takih embargov, tudi ekonomskih;
Considers that the existing embargo is anything but conducive to achieving such progress, and urges all the parties involved to refrain from imposing such embargoes, including economic embargoes;
8.3.2010 B7-0179/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0020/2010 – O-0026/2010
8.3.2010 B7-0179/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0020/2010 – O-0026/2010
PE439.695v01-00 B7‑0179/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
PE439.695v01-00 B7‑0179/2010 European Parliament resolution on the transparency and state of play of the ACTA negotiations
B. ker so leta 2008 Evropska unija in druge države OECD začele pogajanja o novem večstranskem sporazumu za okrepitev uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine ter boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu (trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju – ACTA),
B. whereas in 2008 the European Union and other OECD countries opened negotiations on a new plurilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRs) and combat counterfeiting and piracy (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement – ACTA),
C. ker bo moral Evropski parlament zaradi začetka veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe dati odobritev za besedilo sporazuma ACTA, preden bo sporazum začel veljati v Evropski uniji,
C. whereas, as a result of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, Parliament will have to give its consent to the ACTA Treaty text, prior to its entry into force in the European Union,
D. ker je Parlament v svojem poročilu z dne 11. marca 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj „nemudoma omogoči javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju“,
D. whereas in its report of 11 March 2009 Parliament called on the Commission to 'immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available',
E. ker je Komisija 27. januarja 2010 zagotovila, da je zavezana okrepljenemu sodelovanju s Parlamentom v skladu z resolucijo Parlamenta z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu s Komisijo, v kateri poziva k „neposrednem in celovitem zagotavljanju informacij Parlamentu na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih [...], zlasti o trgovinskih zadevah in drugih pogajanjih v okviru postopka odobritve, tako da se zagotovi polna učinkovitosti člena 218 PDEU“,
E. whereas on 27 January 2010 the Commission provided assurances as to its commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament, in line with Parliament's resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement with the Commission calling for 'immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements (...), in particular on trade matters and other negotiations involving the consent procedure, (...) to give full effect to Article 218 of the TFEU',
F. ker so se predstavniki Sveta udeležili krogov pogajanj skupaj s predstavniki Komisije,
F. whereas Council representatives have attended rounds of negotiations alongside Commission representatives,
G. ker je Komisija kot varuhinja pogodb zavezana, da pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo v EU, zagovarja pravni red Skupnosti,
G. whereas the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, is obliged to uphold the acquis commun au taire when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU,
H. ker na podlagi dokumentov, ki so prišli v javnost, pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA med drugim obravnavajo nastajajočo zakonodajo EU o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine (COD/2005/0127 – kazenski ukrepi za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine (IPRED-II)) in veljavno zakonodajo EU o elektronskem poslovanju in varstvu podatkov,
H. whereas, according to documents leaked, the ACTA negotiations touch on, among other things, pending EU legislation regarding the enforcement of IPRs (COD/2005/0127 – Criminal measures aimed at assuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights (IPRED-II)) and on existing EU legislation regarding e-Commerce and data protection,
I. ker trgovinska pogajanja, ki ne sodijo med običajne postopke odločanja v EU, ne bi smela zaobiti prizadevanj EU za uskladitev ukrepov za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine,
I. whereas the ongoing EU efforts to harmonise IPR enforcement measures should not be circumvented by trade negotiations which are outside the scope of normal EU decision-making processes,
J. ker je treba nujno zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine razvijejo na takšen način, da ne ovirajo inovacij ali konkurence, ne ogrožajo omejitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, ne omejujejo prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjujejo zakonitega trgovanja,
J. whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or competition, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade,
5. poudarja, da si pridržuje pravico do vložitve tožbe na Sodišču Evropske unije, da bi tako zaščitil svoje pristojnosti, če ne bo takoj in v celoti obveščen na vseh stopnjah pogajanj;
Stresses that, unless it is immediately and fully informed at all stages of the negotiations, it reserves the right to bring an action before the CJEU in order to safeguard its prerogatives;
8. poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj zagotovi, da bo izvajanje določb sporazuma ACTA, zlasti tistih o postopkih uveljavljanja avtorskih pravic v digitalnem okolju, popolnoma v skladu s črko in z duhom pravnega reda Skupnosti;
Urges the Commission and the Council to ensure that the enforcement of ACTA provisions - especially those on copyright enforcement procedures in the digital environment - is fully in line with the letter and spirit of the acquis commun au taire ;
8.3.2010 B7-0180/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0020/2010
8.3.2010 B7-0180/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0020/2010
o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations
PE439.696v01-00 B7‑0180/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA)
PE439.696v01-00 B7‑0180/2010 European Parliament resolution on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo za naslednje zakonodajno obdobje Sprejeta besedila, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
– having regard to its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a revised Framework Agreement between the European Parliament and the Commission for the next legislative term' Texts adopted, P7_TA(2010)0009 .
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 11. marca 2009 o dostopu javnosti do dokumentov Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije (prenovitev) kot stališča Evropskega parlamenta v prvi obravnavi Sprejeta besedila, P6_TA(2009)0114 .
– having regard to its resolution of 11 March 2009 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (recast), to be considered as Parliament's position at first reading Texts adopted, P6_TA(2009)0114 .
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo podatkov z dne 22. februarja 2010 o potekajočih pogajanjih Evropske unije o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju (ACTA),
– having regard to the opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 22 February 2010 on the current negotiations by the European Union on an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA),
– ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, zlasti člena 8 te listine,
– having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and in particular its Article 8,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 95/46/ES in Direktive 2002/58/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o obdelavi osebnih podatkov in varstvu zasebnosti na področju elektronskih komunikacij, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Direktivo 2009/136/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 25. novembra 2009,
– having regard to Directive 95/46/EC and Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector, as last amended by Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009,
– ob upoštevanju Direktive 2000/31/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 8. junija 2000 o nekaterih pravnih vidikih storitev informacijske družbe, zlasti elektronskega poslovanja na notranjem trgu (Direktiva o elektronskem poslovanju),
– having regard to Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (Directive on Electronic Commerce),
– ob upoštevanju člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije,
– having regard to Article 218 of the TFEU,
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja Komisiji z dne 24. februarja 2010 o preglednosti in stanju pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA ( O-0026/2010 – B7‑0020/2010 ),
– having regard to the question of 24 February 2010 to the Commission on transparency and the state of play of ACTA negotiations ( O-0026/2010 – B7‑0020/2010 ),
A. ker so leta 2008 ZDA, Evropska unija in nekatere druge države začele pogajanja o novem večstranskem sporazumu za okrepitev uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine ter boj proti ponarejanju in piratstvu (trgovinski sporazum proti ponarejanju – ACTA),
A. whereas in 2008 the US, Japan, the EU and a few other countries opened negotiations on a new multilateral agreement designed to strengthen the enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) and combat counterfeiting and piracy (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement - ACTA),
B. ob upoštevanju potrebe po boju proti ponarejanju in zaščiti nekaterih pravic, ki pa ne morejo imeti prednosti pred človekovimi pravicami in temeljnimi svoboščinami, torej temeljih naših družb in demokracije; ob upoštevanju različnih domen, ki jih skušajo v svojih dogovorih zajeti pogajalci, in dejstva, da pogajanja potekajo v tajnosti,
B. having regard to the necessity to fight counterfeiting and to protect certain rights which, however, cannot take precedence over human rights and fundamental freedoms that are the keystone of our societies and of democracy; considering the various domains that the negotiators aim to cover in their agreements and the fact that they negotiate secretly,
C. ker je Parlament v svojem poročilu z dne 11. marca 2009 pozval Komisijo, naj „nemudoma omogoči javno dostopnost vseh dokumentov, povezanih s potekajočimi mednarodnimi pogajanji o trgovinskem sporazumu proti ponarejanju“,
C. whereas, in its report of 11 March 2009, Parliament called on the Commission to 'immediately make all documents related to the ongoing international negotiations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) publicly available',
D. ker se je Komisija 27. januarja 2010 zavezala, da bo okrepljeno sodelovala s Parlamentom na podlagi pogojev iz njegove resolucije z dne 9. februarja 2010 o revidiranem okvirnem sporazumu s Komisijo, v kateri zahteva neposredno in celovito zagotavljanje informacij na vseh stopnjah pogajanj o mednarodnih sporazumih, zlasti o trgovinskih zadevah in drugih pogajanjih v okviru postopka odobritve, tako da se zagotovi polna učinkovitost člena 218 Pogodbe o delovanju EU,
D. whereas the Commission on 27 January 2010 made a commitment to a reinforced association with Parliament based on the terms of its resolution of 9 February 2010 on a renewed Framework Agreement with the Commission, demanding 'immediate and full information at every stage of negotiations on international agreements, in particular on trade matters and other negotiations involving the consent procedure, to give full effect to Article 218 TFEU',
E. ker je Komisija kot varuhinja pogodb zavezana, da pri pogajanjih o mednarodnih sporazumih, ki vplivajo na zakonodajo v EU, zagovarja pravni red Skupnosti,
E. whereas the Commission, as guardian of the Treaties, is obliged to uphold the acquis communau taire when negotiating international agreements affecting legislation in the EU,
F. ker pogajanja o sporazumu ACTA sodeč po dokumentih, ki so prišli v javnost, med drugim obravnavajo nastajajočo zakonodajo EU o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine (COD/2005/0127 – kazenski ukrepi za zagotavljanje uveljavljanja pravic intelektualne lastnine (IPRED-II)) in t.i. paket telekomunikacij, ne spoštujejo pa veljavne zakonodaje EU o elektronskem poslovanju in varstvu podatkov,
F. whereas, according to documents leaked, the ACTA negotiations touch, among other considerations, on pending EU legislation regarding the enforcement of IPRs (COD/2005/0127, Criminal measures aimed at assuring the enforcement of intellectual property rights, (IPRED-II)) and the so-called 'Telecom Package', and do not respect the existing EU legislation regarding e-commerce and data protection,
H. ker je treba nujno zagotoviti, da se ukrepi za uveljavljanje pravic intelektualne lastnine razvijejo na takšen način, da ne ovirajo inovacij ali prenosa tehnologij, ne ogrožajo omejitev pravic intelektualne lastnine in varstva osebnih podatkov, ne omejujejo prostega pretoka informacij ali po nepotrebnem obremenjujejo zakonitega trgovanja,
H. whereas it is crucial to ensure that the development of IPR enforcement measures is accomplished in a manner that does not impede innovation or transfer of technology, undermine IPR limitations and personal data protection, restrict the free flow of information or unduly burden legitimate trade,
I. ker mora biti vsak dogovor, ki ga Evropska unija sklene o sporazumu ACTA, v skladu s pravnimi obveznostmi, ki jih ima EU v zvezi z zakonodajo o zasebnosti, svobodi izražanja in varstvu podatkov, kakor je določeno zlasti v Direktivi 95/46/ES, Direktivi 2002/58/ES ter sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in Sodišča Evropske unije,
I. whereas any agreement reached by the European Union on ACTA must comply with the legal obligations imposed on the EU with respect to privacy, freedom of expression and data protection law, as notably set forth in Directive 95/46/EC, in Directive 2002/58/EC and in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and of the Court of Justice,
J. ker mora Evropsko unijo pri delovanju na mednarodni ravni voditi načelo univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin,
J. whereas the EU's actions at international level should be guided by the principle of the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms,
2. obsoja uporabljeni postopek, ki ni demokratičen, ter vedenje Sveta in Komisije do Evropskega parlamenta in državljanov Evropske unije;
Condemns the procedure used, which is not democratic, and the behaviour of the Council and the Commission towards the European Parliament and the citizens of the European Union;
5. meni, da ni legitimnih argumentov za nerazkritje, kadar gre za mednarodna pogajanja o uveljavljanju pravic intelektualne lastnine ali podobna vprašanja, ki so zakonodajne narave in ki vplivajo na temeljne pravice;
Is of the opinion that no legitimate arguments for non-disclosure exist with regard to international negotiations on the enforcement of intellectual property rights or similar issues which are legislative in character and which have an impact on fundamental rights;
7. priznava, da bi zraven jasne pravne obveznosti obveščanja Parlamenta, dokumenti o sporazumu ACTA morali biti na voljo tudi širši javnosti v EU in v drugih državah, ki sodelujejo pri pogajanjih; razume obsežne javne kritike na račun tajnosti pogajanj o sporazumu ACTA kot jasen znak, da je izbrani pogajalski postopek politično nevzdržen;
Acknowledges that in addition to the clear legal obligation to inform Parliament, the ACTA documents should also be available to the general public in the EU and in the other countries participating in the negotiations; understands the wide public criticism of the secrecy of the ACTA negotiations as a clear signal of the political unsustainability of the negotiating procedure chosen;
19. poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bo izvajanje določb sporazuma ACTA, zlasti tistih o postopkih uveljavljanja avtorskih pravic v digitalnem okolju, povsem v skladu z duhom in črko pravnega reda Skupnosti in da to ne bo pomenilo, da zasebna podjetja nalagajo ‘samoregulativne’ ukrepe izven področja demokratičnega postopka določanja;
Urges the Commission to ensure that the enforcement of ACTA provisions - especially its provisions on copyright enforcement procedures in the digital environment - is fully in line with the letter and the spirit of the acquis communautaire and does not imply 'self-regulatory' measures being imposed by private companies outside the scope of democratic decision-making processes;
21. izraža globoko zaskrbljenost nad dejstvom, da se EU s pomembnimi trgovinskimi partnerji že več let pogaja o mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih, ki vključujejo tudi vrsto ukrepov, ki so v nasprotju z načeli demokracije; bo z vsemi sredstvi in postopki izsilil njihovo spoštovanje;
Expresses its deepest concern about the fact that the EU has for years been negotiating international trade agreements with important trade partners, including numerous measures contrary to the principles of democracy; will use all means and procedures to compel due respect for them;
8.3.2010 B7-0181/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0018/2010
8.3.2010 B7-0181/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0018/2010
o uredbi o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov
on the regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences (GSP)
PE439.697v01-00 B7‑0181/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o uredbi o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov
PE439.697v01-00 B7‑0181/2010 European Parliament resolution on the regulation applying a scheme of Generalised Tariff Preferences (GSP)
– ob upoštevanju Splošnega sporazuma o carinah in trgovini (GATT), zlasti "razvojne klavzule" iz leta 1979,
– having regard to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), and in particular the 1979 'enabling clause',
– ob upoštevanju zakonodajne resolucije z dne 5. junija 2008 o predlogu uredbe Sveta o uporabi sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov v obdobju od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 ( 2007/0289(CNS) ),
– having regard to the legislative resolution of 5 June 2008 on the proposal for a Council regulation applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 ( 2007/0289(CNS) ),
– ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 732/2008 z dne 22. julija 2008,
– having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008,
– ob upoštevanju poglavja 1 naslova V Pogodbe o Evropski uniji (PEU),
– having regard to Chapter 1 of Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),
– ob upoštevanju člena 207 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
– having regard to Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
A. ker je "razvojna klavzula" pravna podlaga Svetovne trgovinske organizacije za splošni sistem preferencialov (GSP),
A. whereas the 'enabling clause' is the WTO legal basis for the generalised system of preferences (GSP),
B. ker od leta 1971 Skupnost dodeljuje državam v razvoju trgovinske preferenciale v okviru svoje sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov,
B. whereas, since 1971, the Community has granted trade preferences to developing countries, within its scheme of generalised tariff preferences,
C. ker je bilo s Parlamentom opravljeno posvetovanje o predlogu Komisije za uredbo Sveta o splošnih tarifnih preferencialih za obdobje od 1. januarja 2009 do 31. decembra 2011 ( KOM(2007)0857 ),
C. whereas Parliament was consulted on the Commission proposal for a Council regulation on GSP for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2011 ( COM(2007)0857 ),
D. ker je 1. decembra 2009 začela veljati Lizbonska pogodba,
D. whereas the Lisbon Treaty entered into force on 1 December 2009,
E. ker morajo v skladu s poglavjem 1 naslova V PEU Unijo pri njenem delovanju na mednarodni ravni voditi načela demokracije, pravne države, univerzalnosti in nedeljivosti človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin ter pospeševanja trajnostnega gospodarskega, socialnega in okoljskega razvoja držav v razvoju s prednostnim ciljem izkoreninjenja revščine,
E. whereas, pursuant to Chapter 1 of Title V TEU, the Union's action on the international scene must be guided by the principles of democracy, the rule of law and the universality and indivisibility of human rights and fundamental freedoms, and must foster the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of developing countries, with the primary aim of eradicating poverty,
1. priznava pomen sheme splošnih tarifnih preferencialov, ki razvitim državam omogoča, da državam v razvoju ponudijo prednostno obravnavo njihovih izdelkov;
Recognises the importance of the GSP, which allows developed countries to offer non-reciprocal preferential treatment in respect of products originating in developing countries;
6. poudarja, da je treba povečati preglednost in demokratično odgovornost pri tem, kako se začnejo in vodijo preiskovalni procesi; zato poziva, naj ga Komisija v celoti obvešča in ustrezno vključi v vse ravni postopkov GSP in GSP+, vključno s predlogom Sveta o seznamu držav upravičenk;
Stresses the need for more transparency and democratic accountability on how the investigation processes are initiated and conducted; therefore asks to be fully informed and adequately involved by the Commission at all the various stages of GSP and GSP+ procedures, including with regard to the Council proposal on the lists of beneficiary countries;
8. poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru svoje revidirane uredbe o splošnem sistemu preferencialov zagotovi redno presojo skladnosti vsake države upravičenke glede njenih obveznosti v okviru GSP+ in tako zagotovi, da ne bodo uporabljeni razlogi iz člena 15(1) in (2) ter člena 16(1) in (2) v zvezi z začasnim preklicem preferencialnih režimov; poziva, naj se to letno poročilo pošlje Parlamentu in Svetu;
Asks the Commission to make provision in its revised GSP regulation for a regular assessment of compliance by each beneficiary country with its commitments under GSP+, and thus ensure that none of the reasons set out in Article 15(1) and (2) and Article 16(1) and (2) for the temporary withdrawal of preferential arrangements applies; calls for that annual report to be sent to Parliament and the Council;
8.3.2010 B7-0182/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0018/2010
8.3.2010 B7-0182/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0018/2010