natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je treba vključiti državljane v vse faze pogajanj in izvajanja sporazuma ter za ta namen vzpostaviti forume o trajnostnem razvoju ali posvetovalne skupine socialnih partnerjev in predstavnikov neodvisne civilne družbe;
underlines the importance of public involvement at all stages of the negotiations and follow-up to the agreement, and to this end calls for sustainable development fora or advisory groups to be set up to allow the social partners and representatives of independent civil society to be consulted;
poziva, naj trgovinski sporazumi EU učinkovito zagotavljajo najvišjo raven preglednosti, stroge standarde javnega naročanja in pripravo poročil, kjer podjetja v razvitih državah in državah v razvoju poročajo za vsako državo, da se prepreči nezakonit beg kapitala;
Calls for EU trade agreements effectively to provide for the highest levels of transparency, stringent public procurement standards and country-by-country reporting by businesses in both developed and developing countries, with a view to combating illicit capital flight;
poziva Unijo, naj uveljavi pravico dostopa do naravnih virov pri pogajanjih o trgovinskih sporazumih in pravice avtohtonih in domorodnih prebivalcev glede dostopa do osnovnih naravnih virov; poziva Komisijo, naj v pogajanja in mednarodne trgovinske sporazume vključi problematiko nakupa in lastništva zemljišč v tretjih državah, zlasti v najmanj razvitih državah in državah v razvoju;
Urges the Union to assert the right of access to natural resources in negotiations of trade agreements and the rights of native and indigenous peoples with regard to access to essential natural resources; calls on the Commission to incorporate the problem of the purchase and ownership of land in third countries, in particular in the least-developed and developing countries, into international trade negotiations and agreements;
priznava, da je poglavje o trajnostnemu razvoju v dvostranskih sporazumih, o katerih se trenutno pogaja, zavezujoče, ampak ga je treba okrepiti, če predvideva:
Recognises that the chapter on sustainable development in the bilateral agreements currently under negotiation is binding but could be strengthened by providing for:
pritožni postopek, odprt za socialne partnerje;
a complaints procedure open to the social partners,
vložitev pritožbe pri neodvisnem organu za hitro in učinkovito reševanje sporov, povezanih s socialnimi ali okoljskimi težavami, kot so skupine izvedencev, ki jih obe strani izbereta na podlagi strokovnega znanja s področja človekovih pravic, delovnega in okoljskega prava, priporočila katerih bodo morala biti, skupaj z določbami za njihovo izvajanje, vključena v dobro opredeljen postopek;
appeals to an independent body to settle disputes relating to social and environmental problems speedily and effectively, such as panels of experts selected by both parties on the basis of their expertise in human rights, labour law and environmental law, and whose recommendations would have to form part of a well-defined process, with implementing provisions,
pritožbe v mehanizmu za reševanje sporov, na enakovredni ravni z drugimi stranmi iz sporazuma, pri čemer se predvidijo kazni za izboljšanje razmer v zadevnih sektorjih, ali vsaj začasna prekinitev nekaterih trgovinskih prednosti, predvidenih v sporazumu, v primeru poslabšanega kršenja zgoraj omenjenih standardov;
recourse to a dispute settlement mechanism on an equal footing with the other parts of the agreement, with provision for fines to improve the situation in the sectors concerned, or at least a temporary suspension of certain trade benefits provided for under the agreement, in the event of an aggravated breach of these standards;
poudarja pomen dodajanja spremljajočih ukrepov k tem sporazumom, vključno z ukrepi tehnične pomoči in programi sodelovanja, ki so namenjeni izboljšanju izvedbene zmogljivosti, zlasti temeljnih konvencij na področju človekovih pravic ter socialnih in okoljskih standardov;
Underlines the importance of adding accompanying measures to these agreements, including technical assistance measures and cooperation programmes, aiming to improve implementation capacity, in particular of the fundamental conventions in the area of human rights and social and environmental standards;
meni, da 27 konvencij, za katere se zahteva ratifikacija in učinkovito izvajanje, da bodo lahko koristile GSP +, predstavlja edinstveno mešanico konvencij o človekovih pravicah, delovnega prava, okoljskih standardov in standardov dobrega upravljanja; poudarja, da je do sedaj GSP + imel pozitiven in viden učinek na ratifikacijo teh konvencij, manj pa na njihovo izvajanje, in zato želi dati večji poudarek spremljevalnim ukrepom za izboljšanje izvedbenih zmožnosti; prav tako meni, da mora Komisija za zagotovitev verodostojnosti GSP+ sistematično izvajati preiskave in v nasprotnem primeru ukiniti preferenciale, če skladni elementi kažejo, da nekatere države ne izvajajo 27 konvencij;
Considers that the 27 conventions for which ratification and effective implementation are requested so that they can benefit from GSP+ represent a unique mixture of conventions on human rights, labour law, environment and good governance standards; underlines that to date, GSP+ has had a positive and visible impact with regard to ratification of these conventions, but less so with regard to their implementation, and therefore hopes to place more emphasis on accompanying measures to improve implementation capacity; also considers that, to ensure the credibility of GSP+, the Commission must launch investigations if consistent evidence indicates that some countries are not implementing the 27 conventions, and where appropriate withdraw the preferences;
meni, da bi morala v sporazumih Evropske unije s tretjimi državami obstajati tesnejša vez med določbami o človekovih pravicah in GSP +, zlasti glede spremljanja;
Considers that a closer link could be established between human rights clauses and GSP+ in European Union agreements with non-member states, particularly with regard to monitoring;
poziva Komisijo, da si med postopkom revizije sistema GSP prizadeva, da bo ta koristil predvsem državam, ki to najbolj potrebujejo, in poenostavi pravila o poreklu, da bodo tako države upravičenke pobude „Vse razen orožja“ in režima GSP+ lahko najbolje izkoristile preferenciale, ki so jim bili dodeljeni; zahteva, da se določijo pregledne primerjave, mehanizmi in merila za dodeljevanje in preklic preferencialov v okviru tega sistema; poziva k popolnemu sodelovanju Evropskega parlamenta pri celotnem postopku, zlasti glede predloga Sveta o seznamih držav upravičenk, začetka preiskav ali začasne prekinitve GSP+;
Encourages the Commission, during the process of reviewing the GSP system, to ensure that the countries that benefit from it most are those that are most in need, and to simplify the rules of origin so that countries that benefit from the Everything But Arms initiative and the GSP+ system may derive maximum benefit from the preferences granted; calls for the establishment of points of comparison, mechanisms and transparent criteria for granting and withdrawing preferences under this system; also calls for the full participation of the European Parliament throughout this process, particularly with regard to the Council proposal on the lists of beneficiary countries, the launch of investigations and the temporary suspension of GSP+;
poziva Komisijo, naj hitro vloži predlog uredbe o prepovedi uvoza blaga v EU, ki se proizvaja z uporabo sodobnih oblik suženjstva, prisilnega dela, zlasti posebno ranljivih skupin, s kršenjem temeljnih standardov človekovih pravic;
Urges the Commission to swiftly table a proposal for a regulation banning the import into the EU of goods produced using modern forms of slavery, forced labour, especially forced labour of particularly vulnerable groups, in violation of basic human rights standards;
poziva Komisijo, naj med pogajanji o mednarodnih trgovinskih sporazumih, v skladu z okvirnim sporazumom o odnosih med Evropskim parlamentom in Komisijo, redno in izčrpno poroča Parlamentu o vseh pomembnih tematskih področjih;
Calls on the Commission, in accordance with the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the Commission, to provide Parliament at all times with comprehensive information on all relevant topics during negotiations on international trade agreements;
poziva Komisijo, naj glede na razširjena pooblastila Evropskega parlamenta, določena z Lizbonsko pogodbo, zagotovi učinkovit pretok informacij ter predstavnikom Parlamenta vedno podeli status opazovalca ter jim s tem omogoči dostop do vseh pomembnih zasedanj in dokumentov;
Calls on the Commission, in the light of Parliament's extended powers under the Lisbon Treaty, to guarantee the efficient flow of information and to accord Parliament, in the persons of its delegates, observer status, and thus access to all relevant meetings and documents, at all times;
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. novembra 2010 o letnem poročilu o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2009 ( 2010/2059(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 November 2010 on the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2009 ( 2010/2059(INI) )
ob upoštevanju letnega poročila o dejavnostih evropskega varuha človekovih pravic za leto 2009,
having regard to the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2009,
ob upoštevanju tretjega odstavka člena 24 in člena 228 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
having regard to Article 24, third paragraph, and Article 228 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije z dne 5. oktobra 2005 z naslovom „Pooblastilo za sprejetje in posredovanje sporočil evropskemu varuhu človekovih pravic in za nastop javnih uradnikov pred njim“ ( SEK(2005)1227 ),
having regard to the Commission's communication of 5 October 2005 entitled ‘Empowerment to adopt and transmit communications to the European Ombudsman and authorise civil servants to appear before the European Ombudsman’ ( SEC(2005)1227 ),
ob upoštevanju Sklepa 2008/587/ES, Euratom Evropskega parlamenta z dne 18. junija 2008, ki spreminja Sklep 94/262/ESPJ, ES, Euratom o predpisih in splošnih pogojih, ki urejajo opravljanje nalog varuha človekovih pravic UL L 189, 17.7.2008, str.
having regard to Decision 2008/587/EC, Euratom of the European Parliament of 18 June 2008 amending Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom on the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman's duties OJ L 189, 17.7.2008, p.
ob upoštevanju revizije izvedbenih določb, ki jo je varuh človekovih pravic opravil, da bi vključevale spremembe pravil, in je začela veljati 1. januarja 2009,
having regard to the revision by the Ombudsman of his implementing provisions in order to reflect the changes to the Statute, which revision came into force on 1 January 2009,
ob upoštevanju drugega in tretjega stavka člena 205(2) svojega poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 205(2), second and third sentences, of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za peticije ( A7-0275/2010 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions ( A7-0275/2010 ),
ker je bilo letno poročilo o dejavnostih Evropskega varuha človekovih pravic v letu 2009 uradno posredovano predsedniku Evropskega parlamenta dne 19. aprila 2010 in ker je Evropski varuh človekovih pravic Nikiforos Diamanduros predstavil svoje poročilo Odboru za peticije 4. maja 2010 v Bruslju,
whereas the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2009 was formally submitted to the President of Parliament on 19 April 2010 and the Ombudsman, Mr Nikiforos Diamandouros, presented the report to the Committee on Petitions in Brussels on 4 May 2010,
ker člen 24 PDEU določa, da se ima vsak državljan Unije „pravico pritožiti pri varuhu človekovih pravic, imenovanem v skladu s členom 228“,
whereas Article 24 of the TFEU lays down that ‘every citizen of the Union may apply to the Ombudsman established in accordance with Article 228’,
ker ima po členu 41 Listine o temeljnih pravicah „vsakdo ... pravico, da institucije in organi Unije njegove zadeve obravnavajo nepristransko, pravično in v razumnem roku“,
whereas, under Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, ‘every person has the right to have his or her affairs handled impartially, fairly and within a reasonable time by the institutions and bodies of the Union’,
ker člen 43 listine določa, da ima vsaka državljanka in vsak državljan Unije ter vsaka fizična ali pravna oseba s prebivališčem ali statutarnim sedežem v eni od držav članic pravico, da se glede nepravilnosti pri delovanju institucij ali organov Skupnosti obrne na varuha človekovih pravic, razen glede Sodišča in Sodišča prve stopnje v njuni pravosodni funkciji,
whereas Article 43 of the Charter states that ‘any citizen of the Union and any natural or legal person residing or having its registered office in a Member State has the right to refer to the Ombudsman of the Union cases of maladministration in the activities of the Community institutions or bodies, with the exception of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance acting in their judicial role’,
ker skupna zunanja in varnostna politika in dejavnosti Evropskega sveta z začetkom veljavnosti PDEU sodijo med pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas, since the TFEU entered into force, the common foreign and security policy and the activities of the European Council have fallen within the remit of the Ombudsman,
ker po členu 228 PDEU Evropski parlament varuha človekovih pravic ne imenuje, temveč ga izvoli „po vsakih volitvah v Evropski parlament za mandatno dobo parlamenta“,
whereas pursuant to Article 228 of the TFEU the Ombudsman is now ‘elected after each election of the European Parliament for the duration of its term of office’ and no longer ‘appointed’ by the Parliament,
ker delo varuha človekovih pravic prispeva k oblikovanju Unije, v kateri se odločitve sprejemajo „v kar najtesnejši povezavi z državljani“, kot je opredeljeno v členu 1(2) Pogodbe o Evropski uniji,
whereas the work of the Ombudsman contributes towards a Union ‘in which decisions are taken as openly as possible and as closely as possible to the citizen’, as provided for in Article 1, second paragraph, of the Treaty on European Union,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2009 zabeležil 3098 pritožb v primerjavi s 3406 pritožbami leta 2008, za 727 pritožb (23 %) v primerjavi s 802 pritožbami v letu 2008 pa je bilo ugotovljeno, da so bile v pristojnosti varuha človekovih pravic,
whereas the Ombudsman registered 3098 complaints in 2009 compared to 3406 in 2008, and whereas 727 complaints (23 %) compared to 802 in 2008 were found to be within his mandate,
ker so v 179 primerih, zaključenih leta 2009 (56 % vseh primerov), zadevne institucije sprejele sporazumno rešitev ali zadevo rešile, kar kaže na veliko pripravljenost institucij in organov Evropske unije, da pritožbe, naslovljene na varuha, vidijo kot priložnost za popravo storjenih napak in sodelovanje z njim v korist državljanov,
whereas in 179 cases (56 % of the total) closed in 2009, the institution concerned accepted a friendly solution or settled the matter, which shows a strong willingness on the part of the institutions and bodies to see complaints to the Ombudsman as an opportunity to remedy mistakes that have occurred and to cooperate with the Ombudsman for the benefit of citizens,
ker je varuh človekovih pravic leta 2009 ugotovil nepravilnosti v 12 % primerov (37 preiskav) in izrekel kritično oceno v 35 primerih,
whereas in 2009 the Ombudsman found maladministration to have been committed in 12 % of cases (37 inquiries), giving rise to critical remarks in 35 cases,
ker je bilo leta 2009 izdanih 15 osnutkov priporočil,
whereas 15 draft recommendations were issued in 2009,
ker se obtožbe o nepravilnostih najpogosteje nanašajo na pomanjkanje preglednosti, vključno z zavračanjem posredovanja informacij (36 % preiskav), nepravičnost ali zlorabo pooblastil (14 %), nepotrebne zamude (13 %), kršitve postopka (13 %), malomarnost (6 %), neizpolnjevanje dolžnosti Komisije v njeni vlogi varuha pogodb (6 %), pravne napake (6 %) in diskriminacijo (5 %),
whereas the most common types of alleged maladministration were lack of transparency, including refusal of information (36 % of inquiries), injustice or abuse of power (14 %), avoidable delays (13 %), procedural errors (13 %), negligence (6 %), failure by the Commission to fulfil its duty to act as the guardian of the Treaties (6 %), legal errors (6 %) and discrimination (5 %),
ker se je povprečni čas obravnavanja pritožb skrajšal s 13 mesecev v letu 2008 na 9 mesecev v letu 2009, kar priča o prizadevanjih varuha človekovih pravic za skrajšanje časa preiskav in o duhu sodelovanja med institucijami,
whereas the average time taken to consider complaints fell from 13 months in 2008 to 9 months in 2009, which bears witness to the Ombudsman's efforts to shorten the average length of his inquiries and the spirit of cooperation of the institutions concerned,
ker ni bilo v letu 2009 za noben primer nepravilnosti napisano posebno poročilo za Evropski parlament,
whereas no case of maladministration led to a special report to the European Parliament in 2009,
ker kritične ocene in priporočila varuha človekovih pravic niso pravno zavezujoča, vendar naj bi spodbujala samonadzor institucij in organov Unije, da bi se izognili napakam in neustreznemu delovanju v prihodnje,
whereas the critical remarks and recommendations of the Ombudsman are not legally binding but have the aim of encouraging self-monitoring by the institutions and bodies of the European Union and may serve as a basis for avoiding a repetition of errors and malfunctions in future,
ker se je vloga varuha človekovih pravic od njegove ustanovitve do danes razvila zahvaljujoč njegovi neodvisnosti in demokratičnemu nadzoru, ki ga nad njegovimi dejavnostmi izvajata Parlament in Odbor za peticije,
whereas the role of the Ombudsman has evolved since the office was created, thanks to the Ombudsman's independence and the democratic scrutiny of his activities performed by Parliament and the Committee on Petitions,
ker je bistveno, da institucije in organi EU v celoti izkoristijo sredstva, potrebna za izpolnitev svojih obveznosti, zato da dobijo državljani hitre in izčrpne odgovore na svoja vprašanja, pritožbe in peticije,
whereas it is essential that the European institutions and bodies make full use of the necessary resources in order to fulfil their obligation to ensure that citizens receive prompt and substantive responses to their enquiries, complaints and petitions,
ker je Parlament z resolucijo dne 6. septembra 2001 UL C 72 E, 21.3.2002, str.
whereas Parliament adopted the Ombudsman's Code of Good Administrative Behaviour in its resolution of 6 September 2001 OJ C 72 E, 21.3.2002, p.
ker evropska mreža varuhov človekovih pravic omogoča, da se pritožnike napoti na druge varuhe človekovih pravic ali podobne organe, ki bodo lahko na svoji ravni nudili ustreznejšo pomoč, ter omogoča izmenjavo informacij in dobrih praks,
whereas the European Network of Ombudsmen makes it possible to redirect complainants to the ombudsmen or other similar bodies which are expected to provide the assistance most appropriate to their level and to exchange information and good practices,
ker se dejavnosti varuha človekovih pravic in Odbora za peticije dopolnjujejo, s čimer se krepi učinkovitost posameznih nalog,
whereas the work of the Ombudsman and that of the Committee on Petitions are complementary and promote greater effectiveness of their respective work,
odobri letno poročilo za leto 2009, ki ga je predložil evropski varuh človekovih pravic;
Approves the annual report on the European Ombudsman's activities in 2009;
izpostavlja, da se je z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe okrepila demokratična legitimnost varuha človekovih pravic, saj ga Parlament sedaj izvoli, hkrati pa so bile njegove pristojnosti razširjene na skupno zunanjo in varnostno politiko in na dejavnosti Evropskega sveta;
Points out that the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty increases the democratic legitimacy of the Ombudsman thanks to his election by Parliament and extends his remit to include the common foreign and security policy and the activities of the European Council;
je zadovoljen, da Listina o človekovih pravicah, ki je odslej pravno zavezujoča, z začetkom veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe uvršča pravico do dobrega upravljanja med temeljne pravice, ki izhajajo iz državljanstva Unije; zato poziva varuha človekovih pravic, naj bo pri vsakodnevni obravnavi pritožb pozoren na spoštovanje te listine;
Welcomes the fact that, with the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is now legally binding, defines the right to good administration as one of the fundamental rights vested in citizens of the Union; calls therefore on the Ombudsman, in his everyday consideration of complaints, to enforce the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
ocenjuje, da so preglednost, dostop do informacij in spoštovanje pravice do dobrega upravljanja nujni predpogoji za zaupanje, ki ga imajo državljani v zmogljivosti institucije, ko gre za uveljavljanje njihovih pravic;
Considers that transparency, access to information and respect for the right to good administration are vital preconditions for maintaining citizens' confidence in the institutions' ability to assert their rights;
meni, da je treba izraz „slabo upravljanje“ še naprej obravnavati širše, tako da bo zajemal ne le kršitve zakonitih predpisov ali splošnih načel evropskega upravnega prava, kakršna so objektivnost, sorazmernost in enakost, nediskriminacija ter spoštovanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin, temveč tudi primere, ko institucije ne delujejo dosledno in v dobri veri ali ne upoštevajo upravičenih pričakovanj državljanov, kar velja tudi za institucije, ki so se zavezale, da bodo spoštovale nekatera pravila in standarde, ne da bi jih k temu obvezovale pogodbe ali sekundarna zakonodaja;
Considers, therefore, that the term ‘maladministration’ should continue to be broadly interpreted so as to include not only infringements of legal rules or general principles of European administrative law, such as objectivity, proportionality and equality, non-discrimination and respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, but also instances where an institution fails to act consistently and in good faith, or to take into account the legitimate expectations of citizens, including when an institution has itself undertaken to respect certain norms and standards without being obliged to do so by the Treaties or secondary legislation;
čestita varuhu človekovih pravic za jasno in obsežno predstavitev svojih dejavnosti; vendarle predlaga, da naj bo v prihodnjih poročilih v povzetku dejavnosti in vsebinski analizi več poudarka na strukturnih problemih in transverzalnih težnjah;
Congratulates the Ombudsman on the clear and comprehensive presentation of his work; suggests, nonetheless, that in future reports the summary of activities and thematic analysis should place greater emphasis on structural problems and general trends;
meni, da je varuh človekovih pravic v obdobju, ki ga zajema poročilo, dejavno in uravnoteženo izvajal svoja pooblastila v zvezi s preučevanjem in obravnavo pritožb ter vodenjem in sklepanjem preiskav, pa tudi glede ohranjanja konstruktivnih odnosov z institucijami in organi Evropske unije ter spodbujanja državljanov, da v odnosu do teh institucij in organov uveljavljajo svoje pravice;
Considers that the Ombudsman has exercised his powers in an active and balanced way during the reporting period, both with regard to examining and handling complaints and conducting and concluding inquiries and with regard to maintaining constructive relations with the European Union's institutions and bodies and encouraging citizens to avail themselves of their rights in relation to those institutions and bodies;