natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
H. ker je v poročilu generalnega sekretariata Sveta za leto 2008 o ukrepih EU za pospeševanje zavez za boj proti mučenju in drugemu slabemu ravnanju v tretjih državah navedeno, da je bila „z uredbo o opremi za mučenje sprejeta prva uredba EU v skladu s smernicami o človekovih pravicah.
H. whereas the 2008 report of the Council General Secretariat on EU actions in furtherance of commitments to combat torture and other ill-treatment in third countries, states that “The adoption of the regulation on torture instruments is the first example of an EU regulation adopted in line with Human Rights guidelines.
To za EU pomeni, da mora oceniti izvajanje te uredbe,“
This entails for the EU the need to assess the implementation of the regulation.”,
I. ker naj bi na podlagi nemškega parlamentarnega predloga Drucksache 16/4446 nemški carinski uradniki leta 2007 potrdili, da so odkrili nedovoljene pošiljke naprav za onesposobitev z elektrošokom iz Nemčije v Gruzijo, Bangladeš, Romunijo in Iran,
I. whereas German customs officials reportedly confirmed in 2007 that they had uncovered unauthorised shipments of electric-shock stun devices from Germany to Georgia, Bangladesh, Romania and Iran, according to German parliamentary motion Drucksache 16/4446 ,
J. ker naj bi na podlagi poročil Amnesty International, Omega Research Foundation in Inter-Press Service podjetja s sedežem v Evropi v nekatere države članice uvažala prisilna sredstva za zadajanje elektrošokov, ki se nosijo na telesu in katerih učinek je zelo podoben pasovom za onesposobitev z elektrošokom, katerih uvoz v Evropsko unijo je prepovedan z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005,
J. whereas European-based companies have reportedly imported electric-shock body-worn restraint into some member states, essentially similar in effect to electric-shock stun belts prohibited for import into the European Union by Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005, according to reports by Amnesty International, the Omega Research Foundation, and Inter-Press Service,
K. ker je odbor Sveta Evrope za preprečevanje mučenja leta 2005 poročal, da bodo v vseh madžarskih zaporih in policijskih ustanovah do konca leta 2005 uvedeni pasovi za onesposobitev z elektrošokom pri napetosti 50.000 V, čeprav v skladu z Uredbo Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005 spadajo med naprave, ki so praktično uporabne zgolj za mučenje in drugo kruto, nečloveško ali poniževalno ravnanje ali kaznovanje, in ker madžarska vlada javno ni predložila nobenih nadaljnjih informacij, ki bi potrdile ali zanikale uvedbo takšnih naprav,
K. whereas the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) of the Council of Europe reported in 2005 that 50,000V electric-shock stun belts were to be introduced in all Hungarian prisons and police establishments by the end of 2005, despite their classification under Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005 as a device which has no practical use other than for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”, and whereas the Hungarian government has provided no further information publicly either confirming or denying the introduction of such devices,
L. ker nekatere države članice Evropske unije, vključno s Češko in Nemčijo, od začetka veljavnosti Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005 dovoljujejo izvoz izdelkov, med katerimi so sredstva vklepanje nog, kemična dražila in naprave za onesposobitev z elektrošokom, ki jih ureja uredba, v države s slabo prakso na področju človekovih pravic,
L. whereas some European Union member states, including the Czech Republic and Germany, have since the entry into force of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005 licensed exports of items including leg restraints, chemical irritants and electric-shock stun devices, controlled under the Regulation, to countries with a poor human rights record,
M. ker je do 29. avgusta 2006 le dvanajst držav članic uvedlo zakonodajo v zvezi s kaznimi, kakor je zahtevano v členu 17 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005,
M. whereas only twelve Member States introduced penalty legislation by 29 August 2006 as required by Article 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005,
N. ker je le sedem držav članic pripravilo enega ali več javnih letnih poročil o dejavnosti s podrobnostmi glede njihovih odločitev v zvezi z dovoljenji, kakor je zahtevano v členu 13 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005, in ker nekatera objavljena poročila niso dovolj podrobna, da bi omogočala smiseln pregled nad temi odločitvami v zvezi z dovoljenji,
N. whereas only seven Member States have produced one or more of the public, annual activity reports giving details of their licensing decisions as required under Article 13 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005, and that some such reports which have been published have been insufficiently detailed to allow meaningful oversight of these licensing decisions,
O. ker seznam predmetov in opreme, za katere velja prepoved trgovine na podlagi Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005, ne vključuje nekatere policijske in varnostne opreme, s katero se zdaj mednarodno trguje in ki je praktično uporabna le za mučenje ali drugo slabo ravnanje, vključno z bodičastimi gumijevkami, nekaterimi sredstvi za vklepanje ob steno ali tla, nekaterimi sredstvi za vklepanje nog, lisicami za prste, lisicami za palce, vijaki za stiskanje palcev in napravami za onesposobitev z elektrošokom, ki se nosijo na telesu, razen „pasov za onesposobitev“,
O. whereas the list of items and equipment whose trade is prohibited by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005 does not include some policing and security equipment, currently traded internationally, which either have no practical use than for torture or other ill-treatment, including spiked batons, certain wall or floor restraints, certain leg restraints, finger-cuffs, thumb cuffs, thumbscrews, and body-worn electric-shock stun devices other than ‘stun belts’,
P. ker seznam predmetov in opreme – trgovina z njimi je pod nadzorom Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005 – ne vključuje nekatere policijske in varnostne opreme, s katero se zdaj mednarodno trguje in ki se sicer lahko zakonito uporablja za kazenski pregon ali kaznovanje, kadar je njena uporaba urejena v skladu z mednarodnimi obveznostmi glede človekovih pravic in standardi dobre prakse s področja kazenskega pregona, a se v veliki meri zlorablja za mučenje ali drugo slabo ravnanje, vključno z lisicami, gumijevkami in drugimi ročnimi napravami za zadajanje udarcev, orožjem za onesposobitev z elektrošokom z napetostjo pod 10.000 voltov ter s posebej zasnovanimi sestavnimi deli in priborom za opremo, ki je pod nadzorom, in prepovedano opremo,
P. whereas the list of items and equipment whose trade is controlled by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1236/2005 does not include some policing and security equipment, currently traded internationally, which may have legitimate law enforcement or penal uses when their use is regulated in accordance with international human rights obligations and law enforcement best practice standards, but which are widely misused for torture or other ill-treatment, including handcuffs, batons and other hand-held impact devices, high-voltage electric-shock stun weapons operating below 10,000 volts, as well as specially designed components and accessories for controlled and prohibited equipment,
Q. ker se bo Odbor za skupna pravila za izvoz izdelkov ponovno sestal 29. junija 2010,
Q. whereas the Committee on Common Rules for Exports of Products is due to meet again on 29 June 2010,
5. poziva Evropsko komisijo in Odbor za skupna pravila za izvoz izdelkov, naj državam članicam zagotovita vodenje in pomoč za okrepitev teh kazni, kjer niso zadostne ali niso uvedene;
Calls on the European Commission and the Committee on Common Rules for Exports of Products to provide guidance and assistance to Member States to strengthen such penalties where they are insufficient or have not been introduced;
8. poziva Evropsko komisijo, naj razvije predlogo za letna poročila držav članic, da bi jim olajšala pripravo teh poročil in zagotovila njihovo doslednost;
Urges the European Commission to develop a model template for Member States’ annual activity reports in order to facilitate the compilation of such reports by all Member States and to ensure their consistency;
13. poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj zagotovijo, da se Odbor za skupna pravila za izvoz izdelkov redno sestaja, naj pripravijo jasen časovni razpored za formalno revizijo uredbe ter oblikujejo postopek za pravočasne preiskave morebitnih kršitev uredbe;
Urges the Commission and Member States to ensure that the Committee on Common Rules for Exports of Products meet on a regular basis, produce a clear timetable for a formal review of the Regulation, and establish a procedure for timely investigations into possible breaches of the Regulation;
15. poziva države članice, naj z nadzorom tehnične pomoči tretjim državam prispevajo k preprečevanju mučenja in drugega krutega, nečloveškega ali ponižujočega ravnanja ali kaznovanja, da se ne bi neustrezno uporabljala za proizvodnjo blaga, ki ima za namen smrtno kazen, mučenje ali drugo kruto, nečloveško ali ponižujoče ravnanje ali kaznovanje;
Calls on all Member States in order to contribute to the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, to monitor technical assistance to third countries in order to avoid to be misused for the production of goods with purpose of capital punishment for the purpose of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;
18. nadalje poziva Komisijo, naj vzpostavi poseben postopek za redno pregledovanje seznamov predmetov v Prilogi II in Prilogi III, kot je predvideno v odstavku 23 Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1236/2005;
Further calls on the Commission to establish a specific procedure to regularly review the lists of items in Annex II and Annex III as mandated in Paragraph 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1236/2005;
22. poziva Odbor za skupna pravila za izvoz izdelkov, naj preuči, kako bi se odstranila izjema od zahteve za dovoljenje za uvoz ali izvoz predmetov iz Priloge III, ki so v tranzitu čez Evropsko unijo;
Urges the Committee on Common Rules for Exports of Products to consider means for removing the exemption for the requirement of import or export authorisations for Annex III items transiting through the European Union;
14.6.2010 B7-0370/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0370/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
on the EU-US air agreement
PE441.952v01-00 B7‑0370/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
PE441.952v01-00 B7‑0370/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU-US air agreement
– ob upoštevanju besedila protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi, ki je bil parafiran dne 25. marca 2010 (sporazum na drugi stopnji),
– having regard to the text of the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand, initialled on 25 March 2010 (‘the second stage Agreement’),
– ob upoštevanju svoje resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010 o začetku pogajanj o sporazumih o evidencah imen letalskih potnikov z Združenimi državami Amerike, Avstralijo in Kanado P7_TA(2010)0144 .
– having regard to its resolution of 5 May 2010 on the launch of negotiations for Passenger Name Record (PNR) agreements with the United States, Australia and Canada P7_TA(2010)0144 .
– ob upoštevanju resolucije z dne 13. januarja 2009 o sodelovanju pri ureditvi varnosti civilnega letalstva P6_TA(2009)0001 .
– having regard to its resolution of 13 January 2009 on cooperation in the regulation of civil aviation safety P6_TA(2009)0001 .
– ob upoštevanju svojih resolucij z dne 14. marca in 11. oktobra 2007 o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu P6_TA(2007)0071 in P6_TA(2007)0428 .
– having regard to its resolutions of 14 March and 11 October 2007 on the EC-US Air Transport Agreement P6_TA(2007)0071 and P6_TA(2007)0428 .
(sporazum na prvi stopnji),
(‘the first stage Agreement’),
A. ker je sporazum na prvi stopnji, ki se je začel začasno uporabljati 30. marca 2008, vseboval določbo o začasnem odlogu, ki bi se jo začelo uporabljati, če do novembra 2010 sporazum na drugi stopnji ne bi bil sprejet,
A. whereas the first stage Agreement, which entered into provisional application on 30 March 2008, contained a suspension clause that could be triggered if there was no second stage Agreement by November 2010,
B. ker je sporazum na prvi stopnji le prvi ukrep v odpiranju trgov letalskega prometa EU in ZDA, ki obe strani trdno zavezuje k nadaljnjim pogajanjem o odprtem dostopu do trgov in večjim koristim za potrošnike, letalske družbe, delovno silo in skupnosti, pa tudi k reševanju vprašanj, vključno z omogočanjem vlaganj za boljši odziv na dejansko stanje v svetovni letalski industriji, z okrepitvijo čezatlantskih zračnih prometnih sistemov in z vzpostavitvijo okvira, ki bo druge države spodbujal k odpiranju njihovih trgov letalskih storitev,
B. whereas the first stage agreement was only a first step in opening up the EU-US aviation markets, firmly committing both sides to further negotiations on continuing to open access to markets and to maximising benefits for consumers, airlines, labour and communities, and to addressing issues including the facilitation of investment so as to better reflect the realities of a global aviation industry, the strengthening of the transatlantic air transportation system and the establishment of a framework that will encourage other countries to open their own air services market,
C. ker so pogajanja, ki so se začela maja 2008, privedla do podpisa predhodnega sporazuma 25. marca 2010,
C. whereas negotiations launched in May 2008 led to a preliminary Agreement on 25 March 2010,
D. ker bi odpiranje trgov zračnega prometa EU in ZDA, ki skupno znašata približno 60 % svetovnega zračnega prometa, koristilo potrošnikom na obeh straneh Atlantika, zagotovilo znatne gospodarske koristi in ustvarilo nova delovna mesta,
D. whereas opening the EU-US aviation markets that, taken together, account for about 60% of world air traffic, would benefit consumers on both sides of the Atlantic, provide substantial economic benefits and create jobs,
Regulativna konvergenca, varnost in varovanje
Regulatory convergence, safety and security
11. poudarja, da je treba pri izmenjavi osebnih podatkov potnikov med EU in ZDA spoštovati zasebnost evropskih državljanov in državljanov ZDA v skladu z merili Evropskega parlamenta iz njegove resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010; glede tega poudarja nujnost oblikovanja standardov o varstvu podatkov in zasebnosti na svetovni ravni;
Emphasises that the privacy of European and US citizens should be respected when personal passenger data are exchanged between the EU and the US, in accordance with the criteria called for by the European Parliament in its resolution of 5 May 2010; stresses in this connection the urgency of arriving at worldwide standards on data protection and privacy;
15. ponovno poziva Komisijo in ZDA, da preverita učinkovitost dodatnih varnostnih ukrepov, veljavnih od leta 2001, ter odstranita prekrivajoče se in šibke člene v varnostni verigi;
Renews its call on the Commission and the US to review the efficiency of the additional security measures adopted since 2001 so as to eliminate overlapping and weak links in the security chain;
20. pozdravlja, da sporazum priznava pomembnost socialne razsežnosti in odgovornost skupnega odbora za nadzorovanje družbenih učinkov sporazuma ter da po potrebi ustrezno ukrepa;
Welcomes the agreement’s recognition of the importance of the social dimension and the responsibility given to the Joint Committee to monitor the social effects of the Agreement and develop appropriate responses as necessary;
21 poziva Komisijo, naj sporazum uporabi za spodbujanje skladnosti z ustrezno mednarodno zakonodajo o socialnih pravicah, zlasti delovnih standardov, vsebovanih v temeljnih konvencijah Mednarodne organizacije dela (ILO 1930–1999), smernic OECD za večnacionalna podjetja (1976, dopolnjenih 2000) in Rimske konvencije o pravu, ki se uporablja za pogodbena obligacijska razmerja (1980);
21 Calls upon the Commission to use the Agreement to promote compliance with relevant international legislation on social rights, in particular the labour standards embodied in the fundamental conventions of the International Labour Organization (ILO 1930-1999), the OECD guidelines for Multinational Enterprises (1976, revised 2000) and the Rome Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations of 1980;
Delovanje sporazuma
Operation of the Agreement
1. nadaljnja liberalizacija prometnih pravic;
1. further liberalisation of traffic rights;
2. dodatne možnosti za tuje naložbe;
2. additional foreign investment opportunities;
3. vpliv okoljskih ukrepov in omejitev infrastrukture na uveljavljanje prometnih pravic;
3. effect of environmental measures and infrastructure constraints on the exercise of traffic rights;
4. boljša uskladitev pravic potnikov za zagotavljanje najvišje možne ravni zaščite za potnike;
4. better coordination of passenger rights policies in order to ensure the highest possible level of protection for passengers;
14.6.2010 B7-0371/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0371/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
on the EU-US air transport agreement
PE441.953v01-00 B7‑0371/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
PE441.953v01-00 B7‑0371/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU-US air transport agreement
– ob upoštevanju besedila protokola o spremembi Sporazuma o zračnem prometu med Evropsko skupnostjo in njenimi državami članicami na eni strani in Združenimi državami Amerike na drugi, ki je bil parafiran dne 25. marca 2010 (sporazum na drugi stopnji),
– having regard to the text of the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the United States of America, on the other hand, initialled on 25 March 2010 (“the second stage Agreement”),
(sporazum na prvi stopnji),
(“the first stage Agreement”),
Regulativna konvergenca, varnost in varovanje
Regulatory convergence , s afety and security
2. dodatne možnosti za tuje naložbe,
2. additional foreign investment opportunities;
3. vpliv okoljskih ukrepov in omejitev infrastrukture na uveljavljanje prometnih pravic,
3. effect of environmental measures and infrastructure constraints on the exercise of traffic rights;
14.6.2010 B7-0372/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0372/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE441.954v01-00 B7‑0372/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
PE441.954v01-00 B7‑0372/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU-US air transport agreement
14.6.2010 B7-0373/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0373/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE441.955v01-00 B7‑0373/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
PE441.955v01-00 B7‑0373/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU-US air agreement
B. ker je cilj sporazuma na prvi stopnji odprt dostop do trgov in večje koristi za potrošnike, letalske družbe, delovno silo in skupnosti, pa tudi reševanje vprašanj, vključno z omogočanjem vlaganj za boljši odziv na dejansko stanje v svetovni letalski industriji, okrepitev čezatlantskih zračnih prometnih sistemov in vzpostavitev okvira, ki bo druge države spodbujal k odpiranju njihovih trgov letalskih storitev,
B. whereas the first stage agreement stated the goal of continuing to open access to markets and to maximise benefits for consumers, airlines, labour, and communities on both sides of the Atlantic, including the facilitation of investment so as to better reflect the realities of a global aviation industry, the strengthening of the transatlantic air transportation system and the establishment of a framework that will encourage other countries to open their own air services markets,
14.6.2010 B7-0374/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE ob zaključku razprave o izjavi Komisije
14.6.2010 B7-0374/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION to wind up the debate on the statement by the Commission
PE441.956v01-00 B7‑0374/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o sporazumu med EU in ZDA o zračnem prometu
PE441.956v01-00 B7‑0374/2010 European Parliament resolution on the EU-US air transport agreement
11. poudarja, da je treba pri izmenjavi osebnih podatkov potnikov med EU in ZDA spoštovati zasebnost evropskih državljanov in državljanov ZDA v skladu z merili Evropskega parlamenta iz njegove resolucije z dne 5. maja 2010; glede tega poudarja nujnost oblikovanja standardov o varstvu podatkov in zasebnosti na svetovni ravni;
Emphasises that the privacy of European and US citizens should be respected when personal passenger data is exchanged between the EU and the US, in accordance with the criteria called for by the European Parliament in its resolution of 5 May 2010; stresses in this connection the urgency of arriving at worldwide standards on data protection and privacy;
18. pozdravlja, da sporazum priznava pomembnost socialne razsežnosti in odgovornost skupnega odbora za nadzorovanje družbenih učinkov sporazuma ter da po potrebi ustrezno ukrepa;
Welcomes the agreement’s recognition of the importance of the social dimension and the responsibility given to the Joint Committee to monitor the social effects of the Agreement and develop appropriate responses as necessary;
3. učinek okoljskih ukrepov in infrastrukturne omejitve na uveljavljanje prometnih pravic;
3. effect of environmental measures and infrastructure constraints on the exercise of traffic rights.
4.6.2010 B7-0375/2010 PREDLOG RESOLUCIJE k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B7‑0314/2010 – O-0080/2010
4.6.2010 B7-0375/2010 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION further to Question for Oral Answer B7‑0314/2010 – O-0080/2010
o kakovosti statističnih podatkov Unije in okrepljeni revizijski pristojnosti Komisije (Eurostat)
on the quality of statistical data in the Union and enhanced auditing powers by the Commission (Eurostat)
PE441.957v01-00 B7‑0375/2010 Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o kakovosti statističnih podatkov Unije in okrepljeni revizijski pristojnosti Komisije (Eurostat)
PE441.957v01-00 B7‑0375/2010 European Parliament resolution on the quality of statistical data in the Union and enhanced auditing powers by the Commission (Eurostat)
– ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Svetu ( KOM(2010)0053 konč.),
– having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council ( COM(2010)0053 final),
– ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropske centralne banke z dne 31. marca 2010 (CON/2010/28),
– having regard to the opinion issued by the European Central Bank (ECB) on 31 March 2010 (CON/2010/28),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Komisije o statističnih podatkih o grškem javnofinančnem primanjkljaju in dolgu ( KOM(2010)0001 konč.),
– having regard to the report by the Commission on Greek Government Deficit and Debt Statistics ( COM(2010)0001 final),
– ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za ekonomske in monetarne zadeve (A7-0000/2009),
– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs ( A7-0227/2009 ),
– ob upoštevanju vprašanja Komisiji z dne 4. junija 2010 o kakovosti statističnih podatkov Unije in okrepljeni revizijski pristojnosti Komisije (Eurostat) ( O-0080/2010 – B7-0314/2010 ),
– having regard to the question of 4 June 2010 to the Commission on the quality of statistical data in the Union and enhanced auditing powers by the Commission (Eurostat) ( O-0080/2010 – B7-0314/2010 ),
A. ker Komisija (Eurostat) doslej ni imela preiskovalnih pristojnosti, ki jih potrebuje, da bi izboljšala kakovost evropskih statističnih podatkov,
A. whereas the Commission (Eurostat) has so far lacked the necessary investigative powers to improve the quality of European statistics,