natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
priznava, da sta varnost in razvoj medsebojno odvisna ter da ne obstaja jasno zaporedje dogodkov za doseganje trajnostnega razvoja na konfliktnih območjih; poudarja, da se v praksi sočasno uporabljajo vsi instrumenti; zato poziva Komisijo, naj opravi dodatne raziskave o pomenu zaporedja vojaških in civilnih posredovanj na konfliktnih območjih ter ugotovitve teh raziskav vključi v svoje varnostne in razvojne politike;
Recognises that security and development are mutually dependent and that there is no clear sequence of events to achieve sustainable development in conflict areas; points out that, in practice, all instruments are deployed in parallel; therefore calls on the Commission to carry out further research into the importance of the sequencing of military and civil interventions in conflict areas and to integrate their findings into its security and development policies;
ugotavlja, da varnostna tveganja v sodobnem svetu vedno bolj zaznamujejo pojavi, kot so mednarodni terorizem, širjenje orožja za množično uničevanje, propadle države, zapleteni konflikti, organizirani kriminal, računalniške grožnje, propadanje okolja in s tem povezana varnostna tveganja, naravne in druge nesreče, ter da ti zahtevajo še tesnejše partnerstvo in osredotočanje na krepitev osrednjih zmogljivosti EU in Nata, pa tudi tesnejše sodelovanje na področjih načrtovanja, tehnologije, opreme in usposabljanja;
Notes that security risks in the modern world are increasingly characterised by phenomena such as international terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, failed states, intractable conflicts, organised crime, cyber threats, environmental deterioration and associated security risks, natural disasters and other disasters, and that these require still closer partnership and concentration on strengthening the core capabilities of the EU and NATO, and closer coordination in the areas of planning, technology, equipment and training;
poudarja vse večji pomen EVOP, s katero se bo izboljšala sposobnost EU za soočanje z varnostnimi grožnjami 21. stoletja, zlasti s skupnimi civilno-vojaškimi operacijami in ukrepi za krizno upravljanje – od preprečevanja kriz na podlagi obveščevalnih dejavnosti do reforme varnostnega sektorja, torej reform policije, pravosodja in vojaških akcij;
Emphasises the increasing importance of the ESDP, which will help to improve the EU's ability to confront 21st-century security threats, particularly in joint civilian-military operations and crisis-management measures ranging from intelligence-driven crisis-prevention actions to security-sector reform, reform of the police and judiciary and military action;
meni, da bi se EU in Nato lahko medsebojno krepila z izogibanjem tekmovanju in razvijanjem tesnejšega sodelovanja pri operacijah kriznega upravljanja, ki temelji na praktični delitvi dela; meni, da bi morale odločitve o tem, katera organizacija naj napoti sile, temeljiti na politični volji, ki jo izrazita obe organizaciji, na operativnih potrebah in politični legitimnosti na terenu ter na njuni sposobnosti, da zagotovita mir in stabilnost; meni, da je sodelovanje pri oblikovanju nove evropske varnostne strategije in novega strateškega koncepta Nata bistveno za izpolnitev tega cilja;
Is of the view that the EU and NATO could strengthen each other by avoiding competition and developing greater cooperation in crisis-management operations based on a practical division of labour; considers that a decision on which organisation should deploy forces should be based on the political will expressed by both organisations, on operational needs and political legitimacy on the ground, and on their ability to deliver peace and stability; notes that cooperation in elaborating the new ESS and the new NATO Strategic Concept is crucial to the attainment of that objective;
meni, da mora EU razviti svoje varnostne in obrambne zmogljivosti, ki ji bodo omogočale boljšo porazdelitev bremena z neevropskimi zavezniki in ustrezno odzivanje na tiste varnostne izzive in grožnje, ki zadevajo le države članice EU;
Is of the view that the EU must develop its own security and defence capabilities, which will allow improved burden-sharing with the non-European allies and an appropriate response to those security challenges and threats which concern the EU Member States only;
poziva EU, naj razvije instrumente svoje varnostne strategije, od diplomatskega preprečevanja kriz ter gospodarske in razvojne pomoči do civilnih zmogljivosti na področju stabilizacije in obnove, pa tudi vojaška sredstva; poleg tega meni, da bi bilo treba v soseščini EU strateško uporabiti instrumente "mehke moči";
Calls on the EU to develop the instruments of its security strategy, ranging from diplomatic crisis-prevention and economic and development assistance to civilian capabilities in the field of stabilisation and reconstruction, as well as military means; moreover, considers that strategic use should be made of the "soft power" instruments in the EU's neighbourhood;
ugotavlja, da bi bilo treba izboljšati dogovore "Berlin plus", ki EU omogočajo uporabo virov in zmogljivosti Nata, da bi obema organizacijama omogočili posredovanje in učinkovito zagotavljanje pomoči v sedanjih krizah, ki zahtevajo civilno-vojaški odziv, s katerim je mogoče opravljati več nalog obenem; meni, da je treba zato dodatno razvijati odnose med Natom in EU z oblikovanjem stalnih struktur sodelovanja ter brez vplivanja na neodvisni in avtonomni značaj obeh organizacij in brez izključevanja udeležbe vseh članic Nata in vseh držav članic EU, ki želijo sodelovati;
Notes that the "Berlin plus" arrangements, which allow the EU to have recourse to NATO assets and capabilities, need to be improved in order to allow the two organisations to intervene and effectively deliver relief in current crises which demand a multi-task civilian-military response; regards it as necessary, therefore, to further develop the relationship between NATO and the EU, by creating permanent structures of cooperation, while respecting the independent and autonomous nature of both organisations and not excluding the participation of all NATO members and all EU Member States that wish to be involved;
poziva Turčijo, naj preneha ovirati sodelovanje med EU in Natom;
Calls on Turkey to cease hindering the cooperation between the EU and NATO;
poziva EU, naj v procesu razvoja bele knjige o evropski varnosti in obrambi oceni tudi skladnost evropskih zunanjih operacij, zlasti kar zadeva sodelovanje z drugimi mednarodnimi partnerji na kriznih območjih;
Calls on the EU, in the process of developing a White Book on European security and defence, to also evaluate the coherence of Europe's external operations, especially as regards cooperation with other international partners in crisis areas;
izraža veliko zadovoljstvo nad francosko pobudo za formalno vrnitev v vojaške strukture Nata in nad prizadevanji francoskega predsedstva Svetu EU, da bi se EU in Nato v odziv na nove varnostne izzive še tesneje zbližali; pozdravlja prizadevanja francoskega predsedstva za sprejem konkretnih pobud v zvezi z združevanjem evropskih obrambnih zmogljivosti; zadovoljstvo izraža tudi nad novim pozitivnim odnosom ZDA do utrjevanja obrambnih zmogljivosti EU;
Strongly welcomes the French initiative of a formal return to the military structures of NATO, and the efforts by the French Presidency within the EU Council to bring the EU and NATO further together in response to the new security challenges; welcomes the efforts of the French Presidency aimed at the adoption of concrete initiatives for the pooling of European defence capabilities; also welcomes the newly positive approach of the United States of America towards the consolidation of EU defence capabilities;
poziva države članice obeh organizacij k večji prožnosti, ciljni usmerjenosti in pragmatičnosti pri izvajanju partnerstva EU-Nato; zato podpira predlog francoske vlade o vzpostavitvi sistematičnih stikov med generalnima sekretarjema Nata in Sveta EU, zlasti, da se prepreči nejasnosti o tem, kje EU in Nato nastopata skupaj v različnih misijah za dosego istega cilja na istem bojišču, na primer na Kosovu ali v Afganistanu;
Urges the member states of both organisations to be more flexible, goal-oriented and pragmatic in the implementation of the EU-NATO partnership; supports, therefore, the French Government's proposal for the establishment of systematic contacts between the Secretaries-General of NATO and the EU Council, in particular so as to avoid confusion where the EU and NATO operate side by side in different missions towards the same common purpose in the same theatre, as in Kosovo and Afghanistan;
poudarja, da je EU, zaradi specifične kombinacije instrumentov, s katerimi razpolaga – civilne operacije, sankcije, človekoljubna pomoč, razvojne in trgovinske politike ter politični dialog – ključni partner Nata; zato poziva EU in Nato, naj okrepita svoja prizadevanja za oblikovanje okvira za celovito sodelovanje pred ratifikacijo Lizbonske pogodbe;
Emphasises that the EU is a crucial NATO partner on account of its specific combination of available instruments: civil operations, sanctions, humanitarian aid, development and trade policies, and political dialogue; therefore calls on the EU and NATO to redouble their efforts towards the establishment of a framework for integrated cooperation in anticipation of the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon;
priznava bistven pomen izboljšanja izmenjave obveščevalnih podatkov med zaveznicami Nata in partnericami EU;
Recognises the vital importance of improving the pooling of intelligence among NATO allies and EU partners;
ugotavlja, da državljani EU podpirajo misije, katerih cilj je blažiti človeško trpljenje na konfliktnih območjih; ugotavlja, da državljani niso dovolj obveščeni o misijah EU in Nata in njihovemu namenu; zato EU in Nato poziva k boljšemu obveščanju ljudi glede njunih misij in glede vloge, ki jo imajo te misije pri vzpostavljanju varnosti in stabilnosti po svetu;
Notes that EU citizens support missions aimed at alleviating human suffering in conflict zones; notes that citizens are insufficiently informed about EU and NATO missions and their purpose; therefore calls on the EU and NATO to better inform people of their missions and of the role those missions play in creating security and stability around the world;
ugotavlja, da bi se morala Nato in EU za utrditev njunega sodelovanja osredotočiti na krepitev svojih osnovnih zmogljivosti, izboljšanje interoperabilnosti ter usklajevanje njunih doktrin, načrtovanja, tehnologije, opreme in metod usposabljanja;
Notes that, in order to consolidate their cooperation, both NATO and the European Union should concentrate on strengthening their basic capabilities, improving interoperability and coordinating their doctrines, planning, technologies, equipment and training methods;
podpira ustanovitev stalnega operativnega štaba EU pod pristojnostjo podpredsednika Komisije/visokega predstavnika, katerega pristojnost bo med drugim tudi načrtovanje in izvedba vojaških operacij EVOP;
Supports the establishment of a permanent EU Operational Headquarters, under the authority of the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative, having as part of its mandate the planning and conduct of military ESDP operations;
poudarja, da so dosedanje operacije EU opozorile na dejstvo, da bi stalno načrtovanje in poveljniške zmogljivosti pri operacijah EU povečale njihovo učinkovitost in verodostojnost;; opozarja, da so misije EU v prvi vrsti civilno-vojaškega značaja, zato takšna struktura ne bi pomenila podvajanja že obstoječih struktur; opozarja še, da je glavno poveljstvo Nata prvenstveno namenjeno vojaškemu načrtovanju, medtem ko ima EU strokovno znanje za načrtovanje in vodenje civilnih, vojaških in civilno-vojaških operacij, ki jih trenutno ne more uspešno izpeljati nobena druga svetovna sila;
Underlines that the experience of EU operations demonstrates that a permanent planning and command capability for EU operations would increase the effectiveness and credibility of EU operations; recalls that, given the civilian-military focus of the EU, such a structure would not duplicate anything that exists elsewhere; further recalls that the NATO Headquarters is primarily intended for military planning whereas the EU possesses expertise in planning and conducting civilian, military and civilian-military operations which no other global actor is currently able to conduct successfully;
poudarja, da bi moral operativni štab EU dopolnjevati sedanje poveljniške strukture Nata in naj ne bi slabil čezatlantske celovitosti Nata;
Stresses that an EU Operational Headquarters should complement the current NATO command structures and would not undermine NATO's transatlantic integrity;
predlaga, da bi morale v dogovoru z Natom vse države članice EU, ki so tudi članice Nata, razmejiti tiste sile, ki se lahko uporabljajo le za operacije EU, da se prepreči blokiranje takšne uporabe s strani členic Nata, ki niso države članice EU; meni, da bi se bilo treba izogniti podvajanju pri uporabi teh sil;
Proposes that, in agreement with NATO, each EU Member State which is a member of NATO should demarcate those forces that can be deployed only for EU operations, so as to prevent such deployment being blocked by NATO members which are not EU Member States; considers that duplication in the use of these forces should be avoided;
izraža stališče, da je medsebojni izziv za EU in Nato ta, da bi sredstva za kadre in zmogljivosti črpala iz enega in istega nacionalnega fonda; poziva EU in Nato, naj zagotovita, da se ti omejeni viri namenijo za najprimernejše zmogljivosti glede na izzive današnjega sveta, da bi se delo ne podvajalo in bi bilo delovanje čim bolj usklajeno; izraža stališče, da bi moral biti strateški zračni most kot primer sorazmerno redkih in dragih operativnih zmogljivosti priložnost za sodelovanje med državami članicami EU in Nata; poziva države članice EU, naj združujejo ter skupaj uporabljajo in razvijajo vojaške zmogljivosti, da bi se izognile razsipnosti, ustvarile ekonomijo obsega ter okrepile tehnološke in industrijske temelje evropske obrambe;
Is of the view that the mutual challenge for the EU and NATO is to make use of the same national pool of resources in terms of personnel and capabilities; calls on the EU and NATO to ensure that these limited resources are spent on the most appropriate capabilities for facing the difficult challenges of today, avoiding duplication of work and fostering coherence; is of the view that strategic airlift, a particular example of a relatively scarce and expensive operational asset, should represent an opportunity for cooperation between EU and NATO member countries; calls on EU Member States to pool, share and jointly develop military capabilities in order to avoid waste, create economies of scale and strengthen the European defence technological and industrial base;
meni, da je za evropsko varnost, poleg potrebe po veliko bolj učinkoviti uporabi vojaških sredstev za doseganje sinergije, bistvenega pomena boljše in učinkovito usklajevanje naložb držav članic, EU v obrambo; poziva k znatnemu povečanju v razmerju skupnih stroškov v vsaki vojaški operaciji Nata in EU; opaža precejšnje razlike v obsegu in v učinkovitosti porabe izdatkov v obrambne namene med evropskimi članicami Nata na eni strani in ZDA na drugi strani; poziva EU, naj poskrbi za bolj pošteno globalno porazdelitev bremena; poziva tudi ZDA, naj pokažejo večjo pripravljenost, da se s svojimi evropskimi zavezniki posvetujejo o vprašanjih, povezanih z mirom in varnostjo;
Is of the view that, in addition to the need for the much more efficient use of military resources, a better and more efficient coordination of investments in defence, in the interest of synergy, by EU Member States is essential in the interests of European security; calls for a significant increase in the proportion of common costs in every NATO and EU military operation; notes the significant difference in scale as well as effectiveness between the defence spending of European members of NATO, on the one hand, and the USA, on the other; calls on the EU to commit itself to fairer global burden-sharing; also calls on the USA to show a greater willingness to consult its European allies on issues related to peace and security;
priznava, da utegne Evropska obrambna agencija, ki se okrepi z Lizbonsko pogodbo, pomembno prispevati v smeri stroškovno učinkovitega javnega naročanja in večje medobratovalnosti oborožitve;
Recognises the important potential contribution of the European Defence Agency, strengthened by the Treaty of Lisbon, towards cost-effective procurement and enhanced interoperability of armaments;
Združljivost članstva v Natu in Evropski uniji
Compatibility between NATO and EU membership
vztraja, da se morajo srečanj EU-Nato brez diskriminacije udeleževati vse države članice EU; poudarja, da je enotnost vrednot in varnostnih dogovorov osrednji faktor, ki zagotavlja evropski mir, stabilnost in blaginjo;
Insists that all the EU Member States must be present at the joint EU-NATO meetings, without discrimination; stresses that unity of values and security arrangements is a vital factor guaranteeing European peace, stability and prosperity;
predlaga, da bi bilo treba članice Nata, ki so kandidatke za pristop k EU, tesneje vključiti v delo EVOP in Evropske obrambne agencije;
Proposes that those NATO allies that are candidates for EU accession should be more closely involved in the work of the ESDP and the European Defence Agency;
ugotavlja, da je bistvenega pomena, da se ustrezno obravnava problem združljivosti med nečlanstvom v EU in članstvom v Natu oziroma nečlanstvom v Natu in članstvom v EU, da se prepreči negativni vpliv na konkretno sodelovanje med EU in Natom;
Notes that it is essential that the problem of the compatibility between non-membership of the EU and membership of NATO, as well as non-membership of NATO and membership of the EU, be addressed and tackled so as not to harm the functioning of EU-NATO cooperation;
še posebej obžaluje dejstvo, da turško-ciprski spor še naprej zelo ovira razvoj sodelovanja med EU in Natom, glede na to, da Turčija ne dopušča sodelovanja Cipra v misijah EVOP, ki vključujejo obveščevalne podatke in sredstva Nata, Ciper pa zato ne dopušča Turčiji, da bi sodelovala pri celovitem razvoju EVOP v obsegu, ki bi bil sorazmeren z njenim vojaškim in strateškim pomenom za Evropo in čezatlantsko zavezništvo;
Deplores, in particular, the fact that the Turkish-Cypriot dispute continues to badly impair the development of EU-NATO cooperation, given that, on the one hand, Turkey refuses to allow Cyprus to participate in ESDP missions involving NATO intelligence and resources and that, on the other hand, in response, Cyprus refuses to allow Turkey to engage in the overall development of ESDP to an extent commensurate with Turkey's military weight and strategic importance to Europe and transatlantic alliance;
spodbuja Ciper, naj kot država članica EU revidira svoje politično stališče o svojem članstvu v Partnerstvu za mir, in poziva države članice Nata, naj se vzdržijo uporabe veta, da bi preprečile državam članicam EU, da postanejo članice Nata;
Encourages Cyprus, as an EU Member State, to review its political position on its membership of the Partnership for Peace, and calls on NATO member states to refrain from using their veto to prevent EU Member States from becoming members of NATO;
pozdravlja dejstvo, da so na vrhu Nata v Bukarešti članice zavezništva priznale prispevek, ki ga lahko ponudi močnejša in zmogljivejša Evropa, in da je zavezništvo še naprej pripravljeno, da se v prihodnosti širi; ugotavlja, da je za države evropske sosedske politike na vzhodu ter za njihov demokratični razvoj in razvoj pravne države nadvse pomembna politika evropske perspektive in torej projekt vzhodnega partnerstva;
Welcomes the fact that, at the NATO summit held in Bucharest, the Allies recognised the contribution made by a stronger and more capable Europe, and that the Alliance remains open to future enlargement; notes that for the European Neighbourhood Policy countries in the east, and with a view to their democratic development and development of the rule of law, the policy of a European perspective and therefore of the Eastern Partnership project is of the utmost importance;
meni, da bi bilo treba, kar zadeva prihodnje širitve Nata, o vsakem primeru presojati posebej; bi vseeno, zaradi evropskih varnostnih interesov, nasprotoval širitvi organizacije na katero koli državo, v kateri prebivalstvo ne podpira članstva ali ima ta država resne nerešene ozemeljske spore s svojimi sosedami;
Is of the view that, as regards future enlargements of NATO, each case should be judged on its own merits; nevertheless, on the grounds of European security interests, would be opposed to enlarging the organisation to include any country where membership does not have the support of the population or where there are serious unresolved territorial disputes with its neighbours;
ugotavlja, da sta za številne sosede EU članstvo v Natu in članstvo v EU realistična in skladna cilja, četudi zgolj na dolgi rok;
Notes that, for many of the EU's neighbours, membership of NATO and membership of the EU are realistic and compatible goals, if only in the long term;
meni, da bi si EU in Nato morala prizadevati za odkrit in stvaren dialog z Rusijo o temah, kot so človekove pravice in pravna država, regionalna varnost, energija, protiraketna obramba, neširjenje orožja za množično uničevanje, zmanjšanje vojaških sil in vesoljska politika; zato meni, da če in ko bo Rusija postala resnična demokracija, ki zavrača vojaške grožnje kot sredstvo pritiska na svoje sosede, bi lahko obseg sodelovanja med EU in Rusijo dosegel raven brez primere, vključno z možnostjo članstva Rusije v vseh evroatlanstkih strukturah;
Considers that the EU and NATO must maintain a realistic and frank dialogue with Russia, including on human rights and the rule of law, regional security, energy, missile defence, non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the limitation of armed forces and space policy; is of the view that, if and when Russia becomes a genuine democracy, and refuses military threats as a means of political pressure on its neighbours, the depth of cooperation between it and the EU could reach unprecedented levels, including the prospect of Russia's membership in all Euro-Atlantic structures;
z veseljem pričakuje priložnosti, ki jih bo ponudil prihajajoče vrhunsko srečanje ob 60. obletnici Nata v Strasbourgu in Kehlu, in sicer za pomladitev zavezništva in okrepitev njegovih odnosov z Evropsko unijo;
Looks forward to the opportunities afforded by NATO's forthcoming 60th anniversary summit in Strasbourg and Kehl for the rejuvenation of the Alliance and the strengthening of its relations with the European Union;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, parlamentom držav članic EU in držav Nata, parlamentarni skupščini Nata ter generalnim sekretarjem Združenih narodov, Nata, Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi ter Sveta Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Parliaments of the EU Member States and of NATO countries, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and the Secretaries-General of the United Nations, NATO, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the Council of Europe.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 19. februarja 2009 o Barcelonskem procesu: Unija za Sredozemlje ( 2008/2231(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 19 February 2009 on the Barcelona Process: Union for the Mediterranean ( 2008/2231(INI) )
ob upoštevanju barcelonske izjave, sprejete na evro-sredozemski konferenci ministrov za zunanje zadeve, ki je potekala v Barceloni dne 27. in 28. novembra 1995, o ustanovitvi evro-sredozemskega partnerstva,
having regard to the Barcelona Declaration establishing a Euro-Mediterranean partnership, which was adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs held in Barcelona on 27-28 November 1995,