natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
in glede na pridobljene izkušnje Komisija pošlje Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu poročilo o izvajanju te uredbe in zlasti
and in the light of experience gained, the Commission shall forward to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on the implementation of this Regulation and in particular of
in 15
and 15
, po potrebi skupaj s kakršnimi koli predlogi.
, accompanied, where appropriate, by any proposals.
Komisija najpozneje
No later than
Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu pošlje poročilo o vseh vidikih živil, proizvedenih iz živali, pridobljenih s tehniko kloniranja, ali iz njihovih potomcev, temu poročilu pa po potrebi sledijo zakonodajni predlogi.
the Commission shall forward to the European Parliament and to the Council a report on all aspects of food produced from animals obtained by using a cloning technique and from their descendants followed, where appropriate, by any legislative proposals.
Uredba (ES) št. 258/97 se razveljavi z dnem začetka uporabe te uredbe.
Regulation (EC) No 258/97 shall be repealed with effect from the date of application of this Regulation.
Vzpostavitev seznama Skupnosti
Establishment of the Community list
Šest mesecev po datumu začetku veljavnosti te uredbe.
Six months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation.
* vzpostavi seznam Skupnosti z vnosom
* at the latest, the Commission shall establish the Community list by entering
na seznam
in this list
novih živil
novel foods
, ki so odobrena
which are
na podlagi Uredbe (ES) št. 258/97
authorised under Regulation (EC) No 258/97
in ki sodijo na področje uporabe te uredbe v skladu s členi 2 in 3
and which fall within the scope of this Regulation pursuant to Articles 2 and 3 thereof
, v ta seznam Skupnosti, vključno s po potrebi vsemi obstoječimi pogoji odobritve.
, including any existing authorisation conditions, as appropriate.
Kakršna koli zahteva za dajanje na trg novega živila ki jo predloži država članica na podlagi člena 4 Uredbe (ES) št. 258/97
║ Any request for placing a novel food on the market submitted to a Member State under Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 258/97
in za katero poročilo o začetni presoji na podlagi člena 6(3) navedene uredbe ni bilo posredovano Komisiji
in relation to which the initial assessment report provided for under Article 6(3) of that Regulation has not yet been forwarded to the Commission
Spremembe Uredbe (ES) št.
Amendments to Regulation (EC) No
se spremeni:
is amended as follows:
o vzpostavitvi enotnega postopka odobritve za aditive za živila, živilske encime in arome za živila
establishing a common authorisation procedure for food additives, food enzymes, food flavourings and novel foods
V členu 1 odstavek 1 se prvi
In Article 1, paragraph 1, first
nadomesti z naslednjim: 1.
is replaced by the following: 1.
V členu 1 se odstavek 2 nadomesti z naslednjim: 2.
In Article 1, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 2.
Enotni postopek določa ureditev postopkov za posodobitev seznamov snovi in proizvodov, katerih trženje je odobreno v Skupnosti v skladu z Uredbo (ES) št.
The common procedure shall set the procedural arrangements for updating the lists of substances and products the marketing of which is authorised in the Community pursuant to Regulation (EC) No
.../2009 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne ... o novih živilih
.../2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of ... on novel foods
Naslov člena 2 se nadomesti z naslednjim:
The title of Article 2 is replaced by the following:
Seznam Skupnosti snovi ali proizvodov
Community list of substances or products
Členu 4 se doda naslednji
In Article 4 the following
Za posodobitev različnih seznamov Skupnosti, reguliranih pod različnimi sektorskimi živilskimi zakonodajami se lahko predloži en sam zahtevek v zvezi s snovjo ali proizvodom, kolikor je zahtevek v skladu z zahtevami vsake sektorske živilske zakonodaje.
A single application relating to a substance or product may be made to update the different Community lists regulated under the different sectoral food laws in so far as the application complies with the requirements of each of the sectoral food laws.
Naslednji stavek se
The following sentence is
na začetku člena 6, odstavek 1:
at the beginning of Article 6, paragraph 1:
V primeru znanstvenih razlogov za pomisleke glede varnosti, se od vložnika zahtevka zahtevajo dodatne informacije glede ocene tveganja.
In the case of scientific grounds for safety concerns, additional information concerning risk assessment, shall be identified and requested from the applicant.
Šest mesecev po datumu objave te uredbe.
Six months after the date of publication of this Regulation.
Zakonodajna resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2009 o predlogu Uredbe Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta o snoveh, ki tanjšajo ozonski plašč (prenovitev) ( KOM(2008)0505 – C6-0297/2008 – 2008/0165(COD) )
European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 March 2009 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on substances that deplete the ozone layer (recast) ( COM(2008)0505 – C6-0297/2008 – 2008/0165(COD) )
ob upoštevanju predloga Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu ( KOM(2008)0505 ),
having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council ( COM(2008)0505 ),
ob upoštevanju člena 251(2) ter členov 133 in 175(1) Pogodbe ES, na podlagi katerih je Komisija Parlamentu podala predlog ( C6-0297/2008 ),
having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 133 and 175(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament ( C6-0297/2008 ),
ob upoštevanju pisma Odbora za pravne zadeve z dne 17. decembra 2008, naslovljenega na Odbor za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane v skladu s členom 80a(3) Poslovnika,
having regard to the letter of 17 December 2008 from the Committee on Legal Affairs to the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety in accordance with Rule 80a(3) of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju členov 88, 51 in 35 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rules 80a, 51 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varnost hrane in mnenja Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A6-0045/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A6-0045/2009 ),
ker po mnenju posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Evropskega parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije predlog ne predvideva bistvenih sprememb, razen tistih, ki so v njem opredeljene kot take, in ker je ta predlog, kar zadeva kodifikacijo nespremenjenih določb prejšnjih obstoječih besedil skupaj z njihovimi spremembami, zgolj kodifikacija obstoječih besedil brez vsebinskih sprememb,
whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance,
odobri predlog Komisije, kakor je bil prilagojen v skladu s predlogi posvetovalne delovne skupine pravnih služb Parlamenta, Sveta in Komisije in kakor je spremenjen v nadaljevanju;
Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission and as amended below;
(Ker je bil dosežen sporazum med Parlamentom in Svetom, je stališče Parlamenta iz prve obravnave enako končnemu zakonodajnemu aktu, Uredbi (ES) št. 1005/2009.)
(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No 1005/2009.)
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta z dne 25. marca 2009 o metodi ABB-ABM kot orodju za upravljanje dodeljevanja proračunskih sredstev ( 2008/2053(INI) )
European Parliament resolution of 25 March 2009 on the ABB-ABM method as a management tool for allocating budgetary resources ( 2008/2053(INI) )
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za proračun ( A6-0104/2009 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets ( A6-0104/2009 ),
ker so institucije EU v okviru spodbujanja k učinkovitosti usmerjenega upravljanja programov Komisije in na splošno Evropske unije v skladu z belo knjigo o reformi leta 2000 ("Kinnockove reforme") sprejele upravljanje na podlagi dejavnosti (ABM), načrtovanje proračuna po dejavnostih (ABB) ter cikel strateškega načrtovanja in programiranja (SPP),
whereas Activity Based Management (ABM), Activity Based Budgeting (ABB), and the Strategic Planning and Programming (SPP) cycle were adopted by the EU institutions following the White Paper on reform in 2000 ( 'Kinnock reforms'), as part of a new drive towards a more performance-oriented management of the Commission and of EU programmes in general,
ker so bili ti pojmi v prakso uvedeni v času Prodijeve Komisije in njenih petletnih strateških ciljev za obdobje 2000–2005, ki vsebujejo tako letni cikel SPP kot tudi ustrezni cikel ABM/ABB na strani virov,
whereas these concepts, in practice, were thus introduced during the Prodi Commission and its five-year strategic objectives for 2000-2005, comprising both an annual SPP cycle and a corresponding ABM-ABB cycle on the resource side,
ker je bil končni cilj nedvomno zagotoviti kar najboljšo uporabo omejenih virov davkoplačevalcev za uresničevanje dogovorjenih političnih prednostnih nalog, tako da se bolje povežejo politike in postopek dodeljevanja sredstev, kar je pomenilo, da bi morale institucije EU vzpostaviti mehanizme, ki bi dosegli namen na nebirokratski in učinkovit način,
whereas the ultimate goal of all this was undoubtedly to make sure that scarce resources emanating from the tax-payer would be used in the best way possible to reach a set of agreed political priorities by better linking policies and the resource allocation process, which meant that the EU institutions would have to put mechanisms in place to achieve this in an unbureaucratic and efficient way,
ker je bila reforma hkrati namenjena učinkovitejšemu upravljanju in izvajanju, večji svobodi delovanja ter jasnejši opredelitvi osebne obveznosti in odgovornosti,
whereas at the same time the reform aimed at more efficient management and implementation, greater freedom to act, and a clearer definition of personal accountability and responsibility,
ker je proračunski organ največjo pozornost namenil najboljši uporabi omejenih virov in zdaj meni, da je prišel čas za oceno dosedanjega razvoja in spodbujanje nadaljnjih izboljšav, ki bi lahko institucijam EU zagotovile visokokakovostne, v učinkovitost usmerjene sisteme,
whereas the budgetary authority naturally attached the highest importance to best use of scarce resources and now considers that the time has come to take stock of developments so far and to give new impetus to some further improvements that could endow the EU institutions with performance-oriented systems of high quality,
ker je v zvezi s splošnim pristopom in razmišljanjem o teh vprašanjih že prišlo do bistvenih pozitivnih sprememb, vendar še vedno obstaja veliko možnosti za nadaljnje izboljšanje upravljanja obstoječih sredstev,
whereas considerable positive changes have already taken place in terms of the overall approach and 'mind-set' concerning these issues but, at the same time, considerable scope for further improvements in the management of existing resources still exists,
meni, da je bilo izvajanje ABM/ABB uspešno in je povzročilo pomembno kulturno spremembo v Komisiji, pri čemer je hkrati pomagalo razjasniti osebno odgovornost in obveznost ter spremeniti upravljanje tako, da je to postalo učinkovitejše, bolj usmerjeno k rezultatom in preglednejše;
Considers that the implementation of ABM-ABB has been a success and has brought about an important cultural change in the Commission whilst at the same time helping to clarify personal responsibilities and accountability, and making management more effective, result oriented and transparent;
meni, da bi morali petletne strateške cilje Komisije – navsezadnje gre za politično podlago splošnega načrtovanja – in njihovo letno pretvorbo v letno strategijo politik (APS) bolje povezati z večletnimi finančnimi okviri, da bi tako poenostavili njihov časovni razpored in vključitev v skladno strategijo z ustreznimi sredstvi, zato meni, da bi moral sam večletni finančni okvir trajati pet let;
Considers that the five-year strategic objectives of the Commission - ultimately the political base for its overall programming - and their annual translation into the Annual Policy Strategy (APS), should be much better linked to the multiannual financial framework (MFF), with a view to streamlining the timing and adoption of these into one coherent strategy with the corresponding resources and therefore believes that the MFF should itself be of five years' duration;
meni, da se programi EU sedaj obširno preverjajo glede nadzora in zakonitosti, vendar pa se dejanskim rezultatom, doseženim v dogovorjenem obdobju, na žalost ne posveča toliko pozornosti; meni, da bi več pozornosti morali nameniti rezultatom, doseženim pri ocenjevanju splošnih letnih dosežkov Komisije, vključno z rezultati v postopku razrešnice;
Is of the opinion that currently, EU programmes are being scrutinised extensively with regard to controls and legality, but, unfortunately, that the same amount of attention is not given to the actual results achieved over their agreed period; considers that much greater attention should be paid to results achieved when evaluating the overall annual performance of the Commission, including in the discharge procedure;
poudarja, da sta jasna opredelitev in razdelitev odgovornosti odločilnega pomena za doseganje rezultatov pri politikah EU in učinkovite porabe v proračunu; poudarja, da so komisarji politično odgovorni; poudarja tudi, da so v odnosu do Parlamenta prav tako v celoti odgovorni za izvajanje preudarnega in učinkovitega vodenja v svojih oddelkih in v Komisiji kot celoti; poudarja, da so dobri odnosi med institucijami v duhu medsebojnega zaupanja in odprtosti ključni element za uspeh;
Emphasises that a clear identification and division of responsibilities are of crucial importance for achieving results in EU policies and good value for money in the budget; stresses that political responsibility lies with the Commissioners; also stresses that vis-à-vis the Parliament, they are also fully responsible for the implementation of sound and effective management in their respective departments and in the Commission as a whole; stresses that good relations between the institutions in a spirit of mutual confidence and openness are crucial elements for success;
meni, da je izjemnega pomena, da ima Komisija kot izvršilni organ, odgovoren za izvajanje, na voljo dovolj sredstev in manevrskega prostora, vendar mora jasno poročati o doseženih ciljih ter uporabi dodeljenih finančnih in človeških virov; meni, da je z vidika proračunskega organa manj pomembno, natančno vedeti, kako so bili cilji doseženi in kako je Komisija notranje delovala; zato v zvezi s tem zagovarja ustrezno višjo stopnjo svobode; poziva Komisijo, naj analizira trenutni cikel ABB/SPP z namenom zagotoviti njegovo skladnost v tem oziru ter predstavi ustrezne predloge za spremembe;
Considers it of utmost importance that, as the Executive responsible for implementation, the Commission has enough means and room for manoeuvre, but that it should report very clearly on the objectives achieved and the use of allocated financial and human resources; considers less important - from the point of view of a budgetary authority - exactly how the goals were achieved and how the Commission worked internally; therefore advocates a correspondingly greater degree of freedom in that regard; calls on the Commission to analyse the current ABB-SPP cycle in order to ensure that it is consistent in this regard and to present any relevant proposals for change;
meni, da bi Komisija morala opredeliti jasne kazalnike kakovosti ter količinske kazalnike za merjenje doseganja političnih in upravnih ciljev ter doseči njihovo primerljivost v času;
Considers that the Commission should establish clear quantitative and qualitative indicators to measure the achievement of policy and administrative objectives and should make them comparable over time;
opozarja, da imajo tudi generalni direktorji generalnih direktoratov Komisije (pooblaščeni odredbodajalci) določeno stopnjo upravljavske in upravne odgovornosti, kot je opredeljena v ustreznih določbah kadrovskih predpisov in z načelom dobrega finančnega upravljanja v finančni uredbi, v smislu učinkovitega, uspešnega ter seveda pravno pravilnega izvajanja programov in politik;
Recalls that a level of management and administrative responsibility, as defined through the relevant provisions in the Staff Regulations and through the principle of sound financial management in the Financial Regulation, also lies with Directors General of Commission DGs (delegated authorising officers), in terms of efficient, effective and, of course, legally correct implementation of programmes and policies;
meni, da je vprašanje jasne verige odgovornosti, ki ni niti preveč razčlenjena niti preveč birokratska, na večini področij še vedno lahko vzrok za pomanjkanje "lastništva" določenih vprašanj v Komisiji, ter si v zvezi s tem želi nekaj jasnih smernic glede izvajanja programov/izvrševanja proračuna ter vpliva ABM in ABB na to tematiko;
Considers that, in most areas, the issue of a clear chain of responsibility, which has neither too many levels nor is too bureaucratic, can still be the cause of a lack of "ownership" for specific issues in the Commission and would like some clear guidelines in this respect as concerns the implementation of programmes/budget and how the question of ABM and ABB influences this topic;
s tem v zvezi pozdravlja nadaljnja prizadevanja, ki bi razjasnila odgovornost posameznih akterjev in okrepila občutek odgovornosti znotraj organizacije; prav tako meni, da je učinkovita uporaba in vključitev ABM/ABB kot orodja za uspeh – in ne kot upravne obremenitve – lahko odločilnega pomena; poziva Komisijo, naj nadaljuje ta proces in predstavi ustrezne predloge za njegovo nadaljevanje;
In this respect, welcomes further work to clarify the responsibility of individual actors and enhance the sense of responsibility within the organisation; also considers, in this respect, that the effective use and integration of ABM-ABB as a "tool for success", rather than an administrative burden, can be of crucial importance; calls on the Commission to continue this process and present any relevant proposals to take it forward;
meni, da sta praktična predstavitev ter sinteza rezultatov in dodeljenih sredstev, uporabljeni v letnih poročilih o dejavnostih, še vedno v zaostanku glede na čas, porabljen za upravne naloge, ki predstavljajo cilje in zahtevana sredstva v pripravljalnih fazah, tj. letna strategija politik, letni načrti upravljanja in poročila o dejavnostih; v zvezi s tem meni, da so potrebni nadaljnji koraki, s katerimi bodo skupne službe Komisije na pozitiven način prevzele lastništvo nad postopkom;
Considers that the practical presentation and synthesis of results and allocated resources used in Annual Activity Reports (AARs) is still lagging behind when compared to the time spent on administrative tasks presenting the goals and requested resources in the preparatory stages, i.e. APS, Annual Management Plans and Activity Statements; in this respect, considers that further development is necessary in which the Commission's collective services take "ownership" of this process in a positive way;
poudarja resnično potrebo po izboljšanih, uporabnikom prijaznih poročilih o rezultatih za Parlament, da bi ta lahko opravljal proračunske, zakonodajne in revizijske naloge; meni, da bi Parlamentu in Svetu pri letnem proračunskem postopku morala biti na voljo bolj zgoščena različica letnih poročil o dejavnostih in njihovo zbirno poročilo, vključno z rezultati in stroški;
Underlines the real need to obtain improved, user-friendly reports on results for the Parliament to execute its budgetary, legislative and auditing tasks; considers that a more concise version of the relevant AARs and their Synthesis Report including results and costs should be made available to Parliament and Council in the annual budgetary procedure;
meni, da je resna pomanjkljivost, da sta letna strategija politik in vzporedne proračunske informacije, ki se vključujejo v predhodni predlog proračuna, do zdaj oblikovala nove prednostne naloge, ne da bi prepoznavala "negativne prednostne naloge", in da posledično ves cikel dodaja eno prednostno nalogo za drugo, ne da bi bile sprejete politične odločitve glede zadev, ki jih je spričo omejenih davkoplačevalskih virov treba skrčiti, da bi tako omogočili izvajanje pomembnejših prednostnih nalog; poudarja, da je to v očitnem nasprotju z osnovnimi načeli reforme; z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da stroge omejitve večletnega finančnega okvira puščajo zelo malo manevrskega prostora;
Considers that it is a serious shortcoming that, until now, the APS, and the parallel budgetary information feeding into the preliminary draft budget (PDB), have introduced new priorities without identifying any "negative priorities" and that, in consequence, the whole cycle tends to add one priority after another without taking any political decision as to issues that, given the limited resources available from the tax-payer, need to be scaled down in order to give way to the most crucial priorities; stresses that this is in clear contradiction of the basic principles of the reform; notes with concern that the strict limits of the MFF leave very little room for manoeuvre;
je seznanjen s predlogi za izboljšanje skladnosti letnih načrtov upravljanja in poročil o dejavnostih, ki se objavljajo s predhodnim predlogom proračuna, a čimer bi se zmanjšala upravna obremenitev procesa SPP, hkrati pa ohranila povezava med cilji in izmerjenimi učinki; meni, da je treba letni načrt upravljanja preoblikovati in poziva Komisijo, naj hitro ukrepa;
Takes note of the proposals to improve the coherence between Annual Management Plans and the Activity Statements published with the PDB so that the administrative burden of the SPP process is reduced while maintaining the link between objectives and measured "outputs"; believes that the Annual Management Plan needs to be reformed and asks the Commission to act swiftly;
še vedno ni prepričan, ali proces SPP/ABM v zadostni meri upošteva pretekle izkušnje in rezultate ter kako se ti v naslednjih letih vključujejo nazaj v sistem; poudarja, da je to povezano tudi s tem, kako se upošteva veliko število študij in vrednotenj, ki jih opravlja Komisija, in ali te študije in vrednotenja, kot bi bilo pravilno, vplivajo na postopek dodeljevanja sredstev; zato predlaga, da se jasneje zahteva povezava z revizijami programa in proračunskim postopkom v formalnih pogojih ocenjevanja; nadalje predlaga, da se v letno poročilo o dejavnostih vključi poglavje o pridobljenih izkušnjah;
Is thus still not convinced that the SPP-ABM process sufficiently takes into account 'lessons learned' and previous results and how these are fed back into the system for the coming years; points out that this is also linked to how the vast array of studies and evaluations carried out by the Commission are taken into account and influence, as they rightly should, the resource allocation process; proposes therefore to more clearly demand a link to programme reviews and the budgetary process in the terms of reference of the evaluations; proposes further to include in the AAR a chapter on the lessons learned;
meni, da mora proces SPP/ABM vključevati tudi oceno tveganj, ki so povezana z doseganjem političnih ciljev;
Believes the SPP-ABM cycle should also include an assessment of risks related to the achievement of set policy objectives;