natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
381), z dne 9. oktobra 2003 o prenosu osebnih podatkov s strani letalskih družb v primerih čezoceanskih letov: stanje pogajanj z ZDA (UL C 81 E, 31.3.2004, str.
381), of 9 October 2003 on transfer of personal data by airlines in the case of transatlantic flights: state of negotiations with the USA (OJ C 81 E, 31.3.2004, p.
105) in z dne 31. marca 2004 o osnutku odločbe Komisije, ki ugotavlja ustrezno raven zaščite, ki je zagotovljena za osebne podatke, vključene v evidenco imen letalskih potnikov (PNR), ki je bila posredovana Uradu ZDA za carine in zaščito meja (UL C 103 E, 29.4.2004, str.
105) and of 31 March 2004 on the draft Commission decision noting the adequate level of protection provided for personal data contained in the Passenger Name Records (PNRs) transferred to the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (OJ C 103 E, 29.4.2004, p.
, v katerih je Parlament že takoj izrazil:
, in which Parliament expressed from the outset:
svojo pripravljenost, da javnim organom iz varnostnih namenov dovoli dostop do osebnih podatkov potnikov, ko je to potrebno za ugotavljanje istovetnosti in za navzkrižno primerjanje z "opazovalno listo" nevarnih ljudi ali znanih zločincev in teroristov (kot se to dela v EU v zvezi s Konvencijo o izvajanju schengenskega sporazuma ali v skladu z Direktivo 2004/82/ES Direktiva Sveta 2004/82/ES z dne 29. aprila 2004 o obveznosti prevoznikov, da sporočajo podatke o potnikih (UL L 261, 6.8.2004, str.
its readiness to authorise access by public authorities to passengers" personal data for security purposes when necessary for the purposes of identifying them and cross-checking them against a "watch list" of dangerous persons or known criminals and terrorists (as is done in the EU in connection with Schengen Implementing Convention or under Directive 2004/82/EC Council Directive 2004/82/EC of 29 April 2004 on the obligation of carriers to communicate passenger data (OJ L 261, 6.8.2004, p.
, ki omogočata dostop do podatkov o istovetnosti, s katerimi upravljajo letalske družbe, prek sistema APIS (Advance Passenger Information System)), in
, which give access to identification data managed by airlines through the Advanced Passenger Information System (APIS), and
svojo globoko zaskrbljenost zaradi sistematičnega dostopa javnih organov do podatkov, kot so številka kreditne kartice, elektronski naslov, povezanost z določenimi skupinami in podatki o stalnih potnikih, ki so vezani na vedenje običajnih potnikov (to je oseb, ki v državi sprejemnici niso zabeležene kot nevarne ali zločinske), zato da se le s teoretičnim vzorcem preveri, ali tak potnik lahko predstavlja možno nevarnost za let, svojo ciljno državo ali državo, skozi katero bo potoval/a,
its deep concerns about the systematic access by the public authorities to data, such as the credit card number, the e-mail address, any affiliation to a particular group, frequent-flyer information, linked to the behaviour of ordinary passengers (i.e. people not recorded in the receiving country as dangerous or criminal) in order to check only against a theoretical pattern whether such a passenger might constitute a potential threat to the flight, his or her country of destination or a country through which he or she will transit;
ob zavedanju, da sistematični dostop do "vedenjskih" podatkov, čeprav v EU ni sprejemljiv, trenutno zahtevajo nekatere države, med drugimi ZDA, Kanada in Avstralija, za zaščito svoje notranje varnosti, vendar poudarja, da:
being aware that systematic access to "behaviour" data, even if not acceptable in the EU, is currently required by countries including the USA, Canada and Australia for the protection of their internal security, but pointing out that:
v primeru Kanade in Avstralije domača zakonodaja predvideva vsebinsko, časovno in količinsko omejen dostop do podatkov, ta dostop pa je pod nadzorom sodnega organa, zaradi česar so Parlament in nacionalni organi za varstvo podatkov v EU presodili, da so ti sistemi ustrezni,
in the case of Canada and Australia, domestic legislation provides for access to data which is limited in scope and time and as regards the amount of data covered and is under the control of a judicial authority, on account of which those systems have been considered adequate by Parliament and by the national data protection authorities in the EU,
v primeru ZDA, tudi po dolgotrajnih pogajanjih s Komisijo in kljub dobri volji, izraženi v "zavezah", še vedno ni pravne zaščite podatkov na področju letalskega prometa; torej je možen dostop do vseh podatkov PNR, z izjemo "občutljivih" podatkov, in jih je možno obdržati leta potem, ko je bila varnostna kontrola opravljena; poleg tega za osebe, ki niso državljani ZDA, ni sodnega varstva,
in the case of the US, even after long negotiations with the Commission and some goodwill stated in the "undertakings", there is still no legal US data protection in the field of air transport; therefore, all PNR data can be accessed, with the sole exception of "sensitive" data, and the data can be retained for years after the security check has been carried out; furthermore, there is no judicial protection for non-US citizens,
ob ponovnem opozorilu, da je Parlament pred Sodiščem Evropskih skupnosti sprožil postopek za ugotovitev ničnosti Sklepa Sveta 2004/496/ES Sklep Sveta 2004/496/ES z dne 17. maja 2004 o sklenitvi Sporazuma med Evropsko skupnostjo in Združenimi državami Amerike o obdelavi in prenosu podatkov iz PNR s strani letalskih prevoznikov Uradu za carine in zaščito meja pri Ministrstvu Združenih držav za domovinsko varnost (UL L 183, 20.5.2004, str.
recalling that Parliament brought proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Communities seeking the annulment of Council Decision 2004/496/EC Council Decision 2004/496/ECof 17 May 2004 on the conclusion of an Agreement between the European Community and the United States of America on the processing and transfer of PNR data by Air Carriers to the United States Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (OJ L 183, 20.5.2004, p.
o sklenitvi sporazuma z ZDA, sprejetem na podlagi Odločbe Komisije 2004/535/ES Odločba Komisije 2004/535/ES z dne 14. maja 2004 o ustreznem varstvu osebnih podatkov, vsebovanih v Evidenci imen letalskih potnikov, posredovani Uradu za carinsko in mejno zaščito Združenih držav Amerike (UL L 235, 6.7.2004, str.
on the conclusion of an agreement with the USA, negotiated on the basis of Commission Decision 2004/535/EC Commission Decision 2004/535/EC of 14 May 2004 on the adequate protection of personal data contained in the Passenger Name Record of air passengers transferred to the United States" Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (OJ L 235, 6.7.2004, p.
, ker sklep ne premore ne pravne podlage ne pravne jasnosti in ker je bilo zbiranje osebnih podatkov, ki ga je dovoljeval sporazum, pretirano v primerjavi s potrebo po boju proti organiziranemu kriminalu in terorizmu,
, on the grounds that the decision lacked both a legal basis and legal clarity and because the collection of personal data authorised under the agreement was excessive when weighed against the need to combat organised crime and terrorism,
ob obžalovanju, da Sodišče Evropskih skupnosti se ni odzvalo na skrbi Parlamenta o pravni zgradbi sporazuma in o skladnosti njegove vsebine z načeli varovanja osebnih podatkov, zapisanimi v členu 8 Evropske konvencije o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin (EKČP),
regretting that the Court of Justice did not respond to Parliament's concerns about the legal structure of the agreement and the congruency of its content with the data protection principles laid down in Article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR);
ob upoštevanju stališča Sodišča, da Sklep Sveta 2004/496/ES ne more biti veljavno sprejet na osnovi člena 95 Pogodbe ES v povezavi z Direktivo 95/46/ES Direktiva 95/46/ES Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 24. oktobra 1995 o varstvu posameznikov pri obdelavi osebnih podatkov in o prostem pretoku takih podatkov (UL L 281, 23.11.1995, str.
taking into account the fact that the Court of Justice held that Council Decision 2004/496/EC could not be adopted validly on the basis of Article 95 of the EC Treaty in conjunction with Directive 95/46/EC Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p.
, ker se prenos PNR podatkov ameriškemu Uradu za carino in zaščito meja (CBP) in uporaba teh podatkov s strani urada nanašata na postopke obdelovanja podatkov, povezane z javno varnostjo in državnimi dejavnostmi na področju kazenskega prava, kar ne sodi v področje uporabe Direktive 95/46/ES in prvega stebra,
, because the transfer to and the use of PNR data by the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) relates to data processing operations concerning public security and state activities in areas of criminal law, which fall outside the scope of Directive 95/46/EC and the first pillar;
ob upoštevanju pripravljenosti, ki sta jo izrazili Komisija in Svet, za tesno sodelovanje s Parlamentom, da se zagotovi popolno upoštevanje sodbe Sodišča; vendar obžalujoč, da Svet ni mogel vključiti Parlamenta v sedanja pogajanja,
taking into account the expressed willingness of the Commission and the Council to cooperate closely with the Parliament in order to ensure full compliance with the Court's judgment; however, regretting that the Council has failed to involve the Parliament in the ongoing negotiations;
ob strinjanju z mnenjem delovne skupine iz člena 29 z dne 14. junija 2006 o potrebnem spremljanju izvajanja sodbe Sodišča Mnenje 5/2006 o odločitvi Sodišča evropskih skupnosti z dne 30. maja 2006 v združenih zadevah C-317/04 in C-318/04 o prenosu evidence imen letalskih potnikov Združenim državam (glej: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2006_en.htm)
sharing the opinion adopted on 14 June 2006 by the Article 29 Working Party on the necessary follow-up to the Court's judgment Opinion 5/2006 on the ruling by the European Court of Justice of 30 May 2006 in Joined Cases C-317/04 and C-318/04 on the transmission of Passenger Name Records to the United States (see: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2006_en.htm)
ob upoštevanju, da je to vprašanje tako pomembno, da bi EU v vsakem primeru morala doseči dogovor z ZDA o primernem mednarodnem sporazumu, ki bi, z ustreznim spoštovanjem temeljnih pravic, določal:
considering the importance of the issue to be such that the EU should, in any event, come to an arrangement with the USA on a proper international agreement which, with due respect for fundamental rights, would lay down:
kateri podatki so potrebni za ugotavljanje istovetnosti in bi morali biti sistematično preneseni na avtomatiziran način (APIS) in katere podatke v zvezi z "vedenjem" potnikov bi se lahko preneslo le v določenih primerih, glede ljudi, ki so v "opazovalnih listah" javne varnosti zavedeni kot "nevarni" zaradi kriminalne ali teroristične dejavnosti,
which data are necessary for identification purposes and should be transferred systematically in an automated way (APIS) and which data relating to passenger "behaviour" could be transferred on a case-by-case basis in respect of people recorded on public security "watch lists" as "dangerous" on account of criminal or terrorist activity,
obdobje hranjenja za obe vrsti podatkov, pri čemer je jasno, da je treba podatke v zvezi s preprečevanjem hudih kaznivih dejanj izmenjati v skladu s sporazumom med EU in ZDA o medsebojni pravni pomoči UL L 181, 19.7.2003, str.
the data-retention period for the two kinds of data, it being clear that data relating to the prevention of serious crimes must be exchanged in accordance with the EU-US agreement on mutual legal assistance OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p.
in izročitvah UL L 181, 19.7.2003, str.
and extradition OJ L 181, 19.7.2003, p.
vlogo, ki naj jo imajo letalski prevozniki, računalniški sistemi rezervacij ali zasebne organizacije (kot denimo SITA in AMADEUS) pri prenosu podatkov potnikov in predvidena sredstva (APIS, PNR itd.) za namene javne varnosti,
the role to be played by airlines, the Computerized Reservation Systems or private organisations (such as the SITA and AMADEUS) in transferring passengers' data and the means envisaged (APIS, PNR, etc.) for public-security purposes,
nujnost doslednega upoštevanja člena 6(d) Uredbe Sveta (EGS) 2299/89 z dne 24. julija 1989 o kodeksu poslovanja računalniških sistemov rezervacij UL L 220, 29.7.1989, str.
the need to strictly comply with Article 6(d) of Regulation (EEC) No 2299/89 of 24 July 1989 on a code of conduct for computerized reservation systems OJ L 220, 29.7.1989, p.
, ki za vsak prenos osebnih podatkov zahteva predhodno soglasje potnika;
, which requires the previous consent of the passenger for any transfer of personal information;
da se izognemo pravnim prazninam na evropski ravni od 1. oktobra 2006 dalje za prenos podatkov potnikov in da se zagotovi, da bodo pravice in svoboščine potnikov varovane celo še bolj kot sedaj, na podlagi enostranskih zavez, ki jih je predložila administracija ZDA,
to avoid a legal lacuna at European level from 1 October 2006 for the transfer of passenger data and to ensure that the rights and freedoms of passengers are protected to an even greater extent than they are at present under the unilateral undertakings submitted by the US administration;
da se vsak nov sporazum na tem področju utemelji na načelih ES o varstvu podatkov, kot to izhaja iz člena 8 EKČP,
to base any new agreements in this field on the EC principles on data protection as drawn from Article 8 ECHR;
Kar zadeva postopek pogajanja
As regards the negotiation procedure:
da se, ob upoštevanju kratkih rokov, doseže dogovor o:
to negotiate, subject to calendar constraints,
novem kratkoročnem mednarodnem sporazumu, ki bo pokrival obdobje med 1. oktobrom 2006 in novembrom 2007 (obdobje, ki ga je prvotno pokrival sporazum med ZDA in ES, ki ga je Sodišče razglasilo za nično),
a new short-term international agreement to cover the period between 1 October 2006 and November 2007 (the period originally covered by the US/EC agreement that was the subject of the Court's judgment),
na srednji in dolgi rok, o bolj skladnem pristopu na ravni Mednarodne organizacije civilnega letalstva (ICAO) k izmenjavi podatkov o potnikih, da se zagotovi tako varnost zračnega prometa kot tudi spoštovanje človekovih pravic na svetovni ravni;
for the medium to long term, a more coherent approach at International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) level towards the exchange of passenger data in order to ensure both air-traffic security and respect of human rights at global level;
da se pooblasti predsedstvo, da s podporo Komisije obvešča Parlament o pogajanjih o sporazumu in da vključi predstavnike ustreznega odbora kot opazovalce v pogovore z administracijo ZDA;
to mandate the Presidency, assisted by the Commission, to inform Parliament of the negotiations on the agreement and to involve representatives of the relevant committee as observers in the dialogue with the US administration;
Kar zadeva vsebino kratkoročnega sporazuma
As regards the content of the short-term agreement
da se premaga pomanjkljivosti, opisane v prvem skupnem pregledu sporazuma (EU in ZDA) Skupni pregled izvajanja zavez Urada za carine in zaščito meja, določenih v Odločbi Komisije 2004/535/ES z dne 14. maja 2004 (Redigirana verzija z dne 12.12.2005).
to overcome, in the first instance, the shortcomings outlined in the first joint EU/US review of the agreement Joint Review of the implementation by the US Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the Undertakings set out in Commission Decision 2004/535/EC of 14 May 2004 (Redacted version of 12.12.2005).
in da se upošteva priporočila Evropskega nadzornika za varstvo osebnih podatkov in delovne skupine iz člena 29 (glej: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2006_en.htm)
and to take into account the recommendations of the European Data Protection Supervisor and the Article 29 Working Party (see: http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/workinggroup/wpdocs/2006_en.htm)
da se vsebino zavez vključi v besedilo sporazuma, da lahko postanejo pravno zavezujoče, zaradi česar bosta morali obe strani vzpostaviti novo ali spremeniti obstoječo zakonodajo, sodstvo pa bo moralo zaščititi osebe, ki jih zadeva sporazum;
to include the content of the undertakings in the body of the agreement so that they may become legally binding, thereby making it necessary for the two parties to establish or modify any existing legislation and for the judiciary to protect persons covered by the agreement;
da se kot dokaz dobre vere na strani administracije ZDA nemudoma v nov sporazum vključi naslednje zaveze, ki se jih po dveh letih od začetka veljavnosti sporazuma še vedno v celoti ne izvaja:
to incorporate immediately, as proof of good faith on the part of the US administration, into the new agreement the commitments, which are still not fully implemented over two years after the entry into force of the agreement, as follows:
strogo omejitev namena, kot je to določala zaveza 3, zato da vedenjskih podatkov ni možno uporabiti za preverjanje finančnih kaznivih dejanj ali za preprečitev ptičje gripe; to omejitev bi bilo treba določiti tudi za nadaljnji prenos teh podatkov;
the strict purpose limitation, as formerly provided for in Undertaking 3, so that behaviour data may not be used for checking financial crimes or to prevent avian flu; such a limitation should also be laid down for the onward transfer of such data;
prehod na sistem "PUSH" (kot to določa zaveza 13), kot v primerih sporazumov ES s Kanado in Avstralijo, saj so vse tehnične zahteve izpolnjene in se to že izvaja, npr. s strani Site;
the shift to a PUSH system (as provided for in Undertaking 13), as in the case of EC agreements with Canada and Australia, since all the technical requirements are in place and this is already done, for instance by SITA;
seznanjanje potnikov o pravilih PNR in uvedba ustreznih sodnih postopkov za pritožbo, kot to določajo zaveze 36-42 in sporazumi o PNR s Kanado in Avstralijo;
provision of information to passengers on the PNR rules, and the introduction of proper judicial complaint procedures, as provided for in Undertakings 36-42 and by the PNR agreements with Canada and Australia;
potrebo po ustreznih navodilih in ustreznemu usposabljanja osebja, ki obravnava podatke, in potrebo po zavarovanju informacijskih tehnoloških sistemov;
the need to ensure adequate instructions and training of the staff who handle the data, and the need to secure the IT systems;
letni skupni pregled, kot je predviden v zavezi 43; ta bi se moral zares opraviti vsako leto, v sodelovanju z nacionalnimi oblastmi za varstvo podatkov in bi moral biti objavljen v celoti, v njem pa mora biti podana ocena, ne le o izvrševanju zavez, temveč tudi o rezultatih sporazuma v smislu odpravljanja terorizma in kriminala;
the annual joint review, as provided for in Undertaking 43, which should indeed take place annually, be conducted in cooperation with the national data protection authorities and be published in full and must assess not only the implementation of the undertakings but also the results of the agreement in terms of eliminating terrorism and crime;
Kar zadeva vsebino srednjeročnega sporazuma
As regards the content of the medium-term agreement
da se Evropski uniji zagotovi jasen pravni okvir, zlasti tako, da se nemudoma sprejme osnutek okvirnega sklepa o varovanju podatkov,
to provide the EU with a clear legal framework, namely by adopting, as a matter of urgency, the Draft Data Protection Framework Decision;
da se omeji količina podatkov, ki se jih lahko zahteva in da se že pri viru filtrira občutljive podatke, kot to zahteva člen 8 Direktive 95/46/ES; ugotavlja, da so prevozniki dolžni posredovati le podatke, ki so jim na voljo, tako da Urad za carino in zaščito meja (CBP) redkokdaj dobi vseh 34 kategorij zahtevanih podatkov; zaključuje, da bi za namen sporazuma, to je boj proti terorizmu in mednarodnemu kriminalu, vključno z organiziranim kriminalom, ter njihovo preprečevanje, zadostovali že podatki APIS; poziva predsedstvo Sveta in Komisijo, da med pogajanji načneta to vprašanje;
to limit the amount of data that may be requested and to filter at source sensitive data as required by Article 8 of Directive 95/46/EC; notes that carriers are required to submit only the data available to them, so that, in practice, the CBP rarely receives all 34 categories of data requested; concludes that for the purposes of the agreement, namely to prevent and combat terrorism and transnational crime, including organised crime, even APIS data would be sufficient; calls on the Council Presidency and the Commission to raise this matter in the negotiations;
ponavlja svojo zahtevo, da nov sporazum evropskim potnikom zagotavlja enako raven zaščite podatkov kot jo imajo državljani ZDA;
Reiterates its previous demand that the new agreement should grant to European passengers the same level of data protection as is enjoyed by US citizens;
poudarja svoje staro stališče, da bi se morala EU izogniti posredni vzpostavitvi evropskega sistema PNR prek prenosa ustreznih podatkov s strani CBP policiji in sodnim oblastem v državah članicah; meni, da bi načrtno zbiranje podatkov običajnih državljanov zunaj okvira sodnega postopka ali policijske preiskave moralo biti v EU še naprej prepovedano in da bi si bilo treba podatke izmenjati, ko je to potrebno, v skladu z obstoječim sporazumom med ZDA in Evropsko unijo o medsebojni pravni pomoči in izročitvah;
Stresses its previous position that the EU should avoid the indirect creation of a European PNR system through the transfer of the relevant data by the CBP to police and judicial authorities in the Member States; considers that the systematic collection of the data of ordinary citizens outside the framework of a judicial procedure or police investigation should remain forbidden in the EU and that data should be exchanged where necessary in accordance with the existing EU/US agreement on mutual legal assistance and extradition;
predlaga, da se pred koncem leta 2006 začne razprava med EU, ZDA, Kanado in Avstralijo, v kateri bi sodelovali parlamentarni predstavniki, da se skupaj pripravi pregled za leto 2007 in da se vzpostavi svetovni standard za prenos PNR, če bo to potrebno;
Proposes that a dialogue in which parliamentary representatives would take part be launched before the end of 2006 between the EU, the US, Canada and Australia with a view to preparing jointly the 2007 review and establishing a global standard for the transmission of PNR, if that is deemed necessary;
odločno priporoča, da Parlament v zvezi s tem organizira skupno sejo s kongresom ZDA, da v vlogi demokratičnih predstavniških institucij prizadetih državljanov začneta dialog o boju proti terorizmu in njegovih posledicah za državljanske svoboščine in človekove pravice;
Strongly recommends that Parliament organise a joint session in this respect with the US Congress, being the democratically representative institutions of the citizens concerned, so as to start a dialogue on the fight against terrorism and its consequences for civil liberties and human rights;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, da to resolucijo posreduje Svetu in v vednost Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and, for information, to the Commission.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o varstvu evropske naravne, arhitekturne in kulturne dediščine na podeželskih in otoških območjih ( 2006/2050(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on the protection of the European natural, architectural and cultural heritage in rural and island regions ( 2006/2050(INI) )
ob upoštevanju Konvencije Unesca z dne 16. novembra 1972 v zvezi z varstvom svetovne kulturne in naravne dediščine,
having regard to the UNESCO Convention of 16 November 1972 concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage,