natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poziva Komisijo, naj za prihodnjo zakonodajo o notranjem trgu zagotovi upoštevanje člena 12 Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije, ki določa, da se „pri opredeljevanju in izvajanju drugih politik in dejavnosti Unije upoštevajo zahteve varstva potrošnikov“;
Asks the Commission to ensure that Article 12 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which stipulates that ‘consumer protection requirements shall be taken into account in defining and implementing other Union policies and activities’, is implemented under future internal market legislation;
poziva Komisijo, naj v svojem letnem poročilu o politiki konkurence bolj poudari prednosti konkurence za potrošnike;
Calls on the Commission, in its annual report on competition policy, to give greater emphasis to the advantages of competition for consumers;
z zanimanjem pozdravlja poročilo o delovanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 1/2003, ki ga je Komisija predstavila pet let po začetku njene veljavnosti in poudarja, da je treba za bolj učinkovito izvajanje uredbe preseči razhajanja pri določanju prednostnih nalog, pri pomembnih vidikih oblikovanja politike konkurence in pri delovanju mehanizmov sodelovanja, čeprav se strinja, da uredba predstavlja temelj postopka modernizacije pravil o konkurenci ter usklajuje delovanje Skupnosti in državnih organov;
Welcomes with interest the Report on the functioning of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 submitted by the Commission five years after its entry into force and, while agreeing that it constitutes a keystone in the process of modernising competition rules and coordinating action by the EU and national authorities, notes the need to overcome differences of opinion concerning the establishment of priorities, important aspects of the development of competition policy and the functioning of cooperation systems in order to ensure more effective implementation;
opozarja na svojo resolucijo z dne 25. aprila 2007 o zeleni knjigi o tožbah za denarne odškodnine zaradi kršenja protimonopolnih pravil ES UL C 74 E, 20.3.2008, str.
Recalls its resolution of 25 April 2007 on the Green Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules OJ C 74 E, 20.3.2008, p.
in vztraja, da mora sedanji zakonodajni predlog v zvezi s tem zajeti vsebino resolucije Parlamenta z dne 26. marca 2009 o beli knjigi o odškodninskih tožbah zaradi kršitve protimonopolnih pravil ES UL C 117 E, 6.5.2010, str.
and stresses that the pending legislative proposal in relation thereto should include the content of Parliament's resolution of 26 March 2009 on the White Paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules OJ C 117 E, 6.5.2010, p.
; ponovno poudarja, da mora Komisija brez nepotrebnih zamud oblikovati zakonodajno pobudo, da bi omogočila lažje izvajanje posamičnih in skupinskih odškodninskih tožb zaradi kršitev konkurenčnega prava Skupnosti, in zagotoviti, da bo ustrezala horizontalnemu pristopu, preprečevala prekoračenja iz severnoameriškega sistema in bo sprejeta s postopkom soodločanja;
; stresses the need for the Commission to propose legislation, without watering it down unnecessarily, to facilitate individual and class-action claims for effective compensation for damages resulting from breaches of EU antitrust law; such legalisation must be cross-cutting in nature, avoid the excesses of the North American system and be adopted using the ordinary legislative procedure (codecision);
poudarja, da podpira zahtevo Komisije, naj se v proračunu 2011 dodeli več sredstev njenemu osebju na področju konkurence; poziva, da se ga obvesti o tem, kako se porabljajo dodatna sredstva; ponovno poziva, naj se sedanje osebje Komisije ponovno prerazporedi na glavna področja pristojnosti Komisije;
Underlines that it has supported the Commission's request for more resources to be allocated to Commission staff in the area of competition in the 2011 budget; asks to be informed about how the additional resources have been used; recalls its request to reassign current Commission staff to the core competences of the Commission;
poudarja, da sta izvajanje uspešne politike konkurence in delovanje brez omejitev notranjega trga bistvena pogoja za trajnostno gospodarsko rast v Evropski uniji;
Stresses that the implementation of a successful competition policy and the unrestricted functioning of the internal market are essential preconditions for sustainable economic growth in the European Union;
poudarja, da bi države članice morale sedanja prizadevanja za davčno konsolidacijo in trajnostno obnovo uporabiti za napredek k bolj enakim konkurenčnim pogojem na davčnem področju;
Underlines that the current drive for fiscal consolidation and sustainable recovery should be used by Member States in order to progress towards a more level fiscal playing field;
meni, da bi politika konkurence morala prispevati k spodbujanju in krepitvi odprtih standardov ter interoperabilnosti, s čimer bi preprečili, da bi manjšina akterjev na trgu tehnološko blokirala potrošnike in stranke;
Considers that competition policy should contribute to promoting and enforcing open standards and interoperability in order to prevent technological lock-in of consumers and clients by a minority of market players;
pozdravlja začasna pravila države pomoči, vzpostavljena kot odziv na finančno in gospodarsko krizo, in sicer vsa štiri sporočila za finančni sektor in začasni okvir, namenjen drugim sektorjem; je seznanjen s podaljšanjem uporabe začasnih ukrepov o državni pomoči za dodatno leto;
Welcomes the temporary State aid rules established in response to the financial and economic crisis, namely the four Communications for the financial sector and the Temporary Framework directed at the other sectors; notes the extension for one additional year of the application of the temporary State aid measures;
je zaskrbljen, da se bodo ti ukrepi, ki so začasni, naposled izkazali za stalne; poudarja, da je treba čim prej prekiniti začasne ukrepe in izjeme, zlasti v avtomobilskem sektorju; poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni merila glede postopnega opuščanja državne podpore, ki se bodo uporabila pri odločanju o morebitnem podaljšanju;
Is concerned that these measures, which are temporary in nature, might ultimately not be that temporary; emphasises the need to discontinue temporary measures and exemptions as soon as possible, particularly in the automotive sector; urges the Commission to provide clarity on the phasing out criteria that will be used to decide on their possible extension;
poziva Komisijo, naj ponovno premisli, če sedanji začasni okvir učinkovito prispeva k enakim konkurenčnim pogojem po vsej Uniji, poleg tega pa, ali diskrecijska uporaba okvira v tem primeru vodi do optimalnega izida;
Calls on the Commission to reconsider whether the existing temporary framework is making an effective contribution to ensuring a level playing field throughout the Union and whether discretionary application of the framework produces an optimal outcome in this respect;
poziva Komisijo, naj pripravi podrobno oceno sklepov, sprejetih v okviru uporabe začasnih ukrepov o državni pomoči kot odziv na gospodarsko in finančno krizo, ob tem pa upošteva obseg, raven preglednosti in skladnosti različnih ukrepov, ki temeljijo na okviru ter to oceno priloži naslednjemu letnemu poročilu o konkurenci;
Urges the Commission to prepare a detailed evaluation of decisions adopted within the framework of the application of the temporary State aid measures in response to the economic and financial crisis, taking into account the scope, degree of transparency and consistency of the different measures which are based on the framework, and to annex that evaluation to its next annual competition report;
ponavlja svoj poziv Komisiji, naj med letom 2010 objavi izčrpno poročilo o učinkovitosti državne pomoči, dodeljene za „zeleno oživitev“, in državne pomoči za varstvo okolja;
Reiterates its request to the Commission to publish, during the course of 2010, a comprehensive report on the effectiveness of State aid granted for ‘green recovery’ and State aid for environmental protection;
poudarja potrebo po ponovni zagotovitvi konkurenčnosti finančnih institucij, za katere niso veljala začasna pravila finančne pomoči;
Stresses the need to restore the competitive position of financial institutions which did not have recourse to the temporary rules on State aid;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da bodo banke poplačale državno pomoč takoj, ko si finančni sektor opomore, s čimer bi zagotovili pošteno konkurenco na notranjem trgu in enake konkurenčne pogoje glede pogojev izstopa;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that banks reimburse State aid as soon as the financial sector has recovered, ensuring fair competition within the internal market and a level playing field with regard to exit conditions;
poziva Komisijo, naj pojasni obvezne ukrepe za prestrukturiranje v zvezi z morebitnim izkrivljanjem, ki bi povzročilo razlike v plačilnih pogojih med državami članicami;
Urges the Commission to clarify the binding restructuring measures related to potential distortive effects resulting in differences in repayment conditions between Member States;
poudarja pa, da je sedanja konsolidacija v bančnem sektorju dejansko povečala tržni delež več pomembnejših finančnih institucij, in zato poziva Komisijo, naj še naprej dobro nadzira ta sektor, da bi povečala konkurenco na evropskih bančnih trgih, tudi z načrti za prestrukturiranje, za katere je potrebna ločitev bančnih dejavnosti v primerih, ko so bile vloge fizičnih oseb uporabljene za navzkrižno subvencioniranje bolj tveganih dejavnosti investicijskega bančništva;
Stresses, however, that the ongoing consolidation in the banking sector has actually increased the market share of several major financial institutions and therefore urges the Commission to maintain a close watch on the sector in order to enhance competition in European banking markets, including restructuring plans that require the separation of banking activities in cases where retail deposits have been used to cross-subsidise riskier investment banking activities;
poziva Komisijo, naj izdela študijo, ki bo pokazala vpliv ukrepov državne pomoči na gospodarstvo;
Urges the Commission to produce a study which demonstrates the impact of the State aid measures on the economy;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi Parlamentu temeljito analizo vplivov državne pomoči na konkurenco med krizo;
Urges the Commission to provide Parliament with a thorough analysis of the impacts on competition of State aid during the crisis;
poziva Komisijo, naj po taki obsežni presoji vplivov izvede korektivne ukrepe, kadarkoli je potrebno, da bi zagotovila enake konkurenčne pogoje na enotnem trgu;
Urges the Commission, following such a comprehensive impact assessment, to implement corrective measures whenever required in order to ensure a level playing field within the single market;
poziva Komisijo, naj izvede temeljito analizo posledic prenovljenih mehanizmov državne pomoči, sprejetih kot odziv na krizo, in ob upoštevanju konkurence ter vzdrževanja enakih konkurenčnih pogojev v EU, finančne reforme in ustvarjanja delovnih mest;
Calls on the Commission to undertake a thorough analysis of the consequences of the revised State aid mechanisms adopted in response to the crisis, as regards competition and maintaining a level playing field in the EU, financial reform and job creation;
poziva države članice, naj dejavno sodelujejo s Komisijo pri oblikovanju in vrednotenju začasnih pravil v odgovor na finančno in gospodarsko krizo, tako da natančno in podrobno poročajo o stopnji njihove uporabe in učinkovitosti; poziva Komisijo, naj izvede oceno o njihovem delovanju in preuči, kako ukrepi, ki so jih sprejele tretje države, vplivajo na EU;
Calls on the Member States to cooperate actively with the Commission in developing and evaluating the temporary rules established in response to the financial and economic crisis by providing timely, detailed reports on their implementation and effectiveness; urges the Commission to conduct an assessment of how they work and to draw up a study on the impact of measures taken by third countries on the European Union;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi kar največjo preglednosti in se strogo drži načela nediskriminacije pri odobritvi državne pomoči in predpisovanju ukrepov odprodaje;
Calls on the Commission to ensure maximum transparency and adhere strictly to the non-discrimination principle in approving State aid and prescribing divestment measures;
poziva Komisijo, naj izdela študijo, ki bo raziskala morebitni vpliv likvidnostne podpore ECB, kar zadeva izkrivljenje konkurence;
Asks the Commission to produce a study looking into ECB liquidity support's possible impact in terms of distortion of competition;
poziva Komisijo, naj tesno spremlja denarno maso M3 glede na državno pomoč, ki je bila odobrena, da bi preprečila nenamerno prekapitalizacijo podjetij, ki bi posledično izkrivila konkurenco;
Calls on the Commission to closely monitor the M3 money supply with regard to State aid that has been approved in order to prevent an unintended overcapitalisation of companies which would subsequently distort competition;
Nadzor državnih pomoči
State aid control
ugotavlja, da je politika državnih pomoči sestavni del politike konkurence in da nadzor državnih pomoči odraža potrebo po ohranitvi enakih konkurenčnih pogojev za vsa podjetja, ki delujejo na notranjem trgu;
Notes that State aid policy is an integral part of competition policy and that State aid control reflects the need to maintain a level playing field for all undertakings carrying out activities in the single market;
zato meni, da je pri ugotavljanju združljivosti državne pomoči s Pogodbo bistveno, da se poišče ustrezno ravnotežje med negativnimi učinki državne pomoči na konkurenco in javne finance ter njenimi pozitivnimi učinki v smislu skupnega interesa;
Considers it essential, when assessing whether State aid is compatible with the Treaty, to find the right balance between the negative effects of State aid on competition and public finances and its positive effects in terms of common interests;
poziva, naj se določijo jasna merila odprodaje ob upoštevanju njihovega srednjeročnega učinka na zadevna podjetja, predvsem na področju rasti, inovacij in zaposlovanja ter upadanja vloge teh podjetij na globalnem trgu;
Calls for the establishment of clear criteria for divestments, taking into account the medium-term impact of divestments on the firms involved, namely on growth, innovation and employment as well as in terms of the reduction of those firms' role in the global market;
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobno spremlja veljavne sisteme državne pomoči v nekaterih državah članicah, da bo preverila, ali so nediskriminatorni in pregledni;
Urges the Commission to carefully inspect fiscal State aid regimes in force in certain Member States to check their non-discriminatory and transparent nature;
poziva Komisijo, naj obnovi in okrepi svojo enoto za davčno državno pomoč;
Calls on the Commission to re-establish and enhance its fiscal State aid unit;
z zaskrbljenostjo ugotavlja, da je vračanje nezakonite državne pomoči dolgotrajen in zapleten proces; spodbuja Komisijo, naj postopke še bolj poostri in vztrajno izvaja pritisk na države članice, zlasti na večkratne kršiteljice;
Notes with concern that the recovery of illegal State aid remains a lengthy and cumbersome process; encourages the Commission to tighten up procedures further and to keep up the pressure on Member States, in particular on repeat offenders;
poziva Komisijo, naj pregleda, v kakšni meri prevelikodušno dodeljevanje brezplačnih dovoljenj EUA (European Union Allowances) v nekaterih sektorjih lahko povzroči izkrivljenje konkurence, saj so ta dovoljenja, katerih učinkovitost se je zmanjšala z upočasnitvijo gospodarske dejavnosti, ustvarila nepričakovane dobičke za nekatera podjetja, hkrati pa zmanjšala njihove pobude, da bi odigrali svojo vlogo v prehodu na okoljsko učinkovito gospodarstvo;
Urges the Commission to examine the extent to which a too generous allocation of free EUA (European Union Allowances) permits in certain sectors may distort competition, given that these permits, whose efficiency has diminished since the slowdown of economic activity, have generated windfall profits for certain companies while reducing their incentives to play their part in the transition to an eco-efficient economy;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba državno pomoč usmeriti tako, da bi spodbujala projekte skupnega interesa v Uniji, na primer postavitve širokopasovnih omrežij in energetske infrastrukture;
Underlines that State aid should be channelled primarily into promoting common-interest projects within the Union, such as the deployment of broadband and energy infrastructures;
pozdravlja sprejetje smernic za osnovna širokopasovna omrežja, ki pokrivajo državno pomoč za osnovna širokopasovna omrežja (ADSL, kabelske, mobilne, brezžične in satelitske širokopasovne storitve) in podporo zelo hitrim dostopovnim omrežjem nove generacije (NGA; v sedanji fazi gre za omrežja optičnih vlaken ali napredna kabelska omrežja), Komisijo in države članice pa poziva, naj razširjajo in spodbujajo najboljše prakse ter povečujejo konkurenco;
Welcomes the adoption of the Guidelines for broadband networks which cover State aid for basic broadband networks (ADSL, cable, mobile, wireless or satellite broadband services) and support for very high speed NGA networks (fibre-based or advanced upgraded cable networks at the current stage), and asks the Commission and Member States to disseminate and promote best practices and increase competition;
ob upoštevanju, da je potrebno dokončanje notranjega trga za vse vrste prometa, poziva Komisijo, naj objavi poročilo s splošnim pregledom vseh državnih pomoči, ponujenih sektorju javnega prometa;
Calls on the Commission – bearing in mind that completion of the internal market for all transport modes is needed – to publish a report with an overview of all State aid offered to the public transport sector;
ponovno izraža svojo podporo smernicam Komisije na področju državne pomoči za varovanje okolja v prometnem sektorju, da bi povečali trajnost evropskega prometnega sektorja; spodbuja Komisijo, naj poveča spodbujevalno naravo državne pomoči, dodeljene sektorju prometa;
Reiterates its support for the Commission guidelines on State aid for environmental protection in the field of transport, with a view to bolstering sustainability in the European transport sector; encourages the Commission to enhance the incentive-based nature of the State aid authorised in the field of transport;
pozdravlja trdno stališče, ki ga je Komisija zavzela glede nekonkurenčnega ravnanja v zadnjih letih;
Welcomes the firm stance the Commission has taken on anti-competitive behaviour in recent years;
pozdravlja podaljšanje vertikalne uredbe o skupinskih izjemah, saj vzpostavlja ravnotežje med proizvajalci in distributerji; vendar opozarja, da Komisija ni dovolj upoštevala posebnih okoliščin prodaje na spletu, zlasti glede na digitalno agendo in ob upoštevanju svojih sedanjih prizadevanj za dokončanje notranjega trga na področju e-trgovine;
Welcomes the extension of the Vertical Block Exemption Regulation, since this ensures a balance between manufacturers and distributors; points out, however that the Commission has failed to take sufficient account of the specific circumstances relating to online sales, particularly with regard to the Digital Agenda and in view of its current efforts to complete the internal market for e-commerce;
glede na to, da Komisija sedaj izvaja spremljanje trga, opozarja zlasti na spornost glede dopustnosti skupnih nakupov velikih distributerjev, ki delujejo na mednarodni ravni;
Points out in particular that, in the light of the market monitoring measures currently being followed by the Commission, the admissibility under antitrust legislation of joint purchases by large distributors operating at international level is debatable;
vendar opozarja, da v praksi nespoštovanje časovnih omejitev ni neobičajno, ter poziva Komisijo, naj bo posebej pozorna na tako nedopustno ravnanje;
Points out, however, that non-compliance with the binding duration of competition clauses is in fact not at all uncommon, and calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to such inadmissible practices;
poziva Komisijo, naj v okviru integriranega regulativnega okvira o varstvu pravic intelektualne lastnine preuči konkurenčno zakonodajo kot orodje, s katerim bi preprečil zlorabo teh pravic;
Invites the Commission to consider, within the integrated regulatory framework on the protection of intellectual property rights, the use of competition legislation as a tool for preventing any abuse of IPRs;
poziva Komisijo, naj, da bi zagotovila pravilno delovanje notranjega trga in enotno uporabo pravil o konkurenci v EU, ustrezno upošteva sodne odločbe nacionalnih sodišč pri uporabi konkurenčnega prava ter v ta namen sprejme vse ukrepe, ki so potrebni za dosego tega cilja;
Urges the Commission, in order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and the uniform application of competition rules in the EU, to take due notice of the rulings of the national courts in the application of competition law and to this end to adopt any measures necessary to achieve this objective;
opozarja, da so karteli ena najhujših kršitev konkurenčnega prava; meni, da so takšne kršitve v nasprotju z interesi državljanov Unije, saj potrošnikom ne omogočajo, da bi jim nizke cene koristile;
Recalls that cartels represent some of the most serious violations of competition law; believes that such infringements of competition law run counter to the interests of EU citizens since they do not allow consumers to benefit from lower prices;
ponovno poziva Komisijo, naj poskrbi za večjo usklajenost med pobudami, ki jih pripravlja na področju konkurenčnega prava, na eni strani in zakonodajo o varstvu potrošnikov na drugi;
Reiterates its call on the Commission to improve coordination between the competition law approach and the consumer law approach in its initiatives;
poziva Komisijo, naj oceni učinek ukrepov glede ravnanja na konkurenco in njihove posledice ukrepov za stranke in potrošnike;
Calls on the Commission to evaluate the impact of behavioural measures on competition and the consequences of these measures for customers and consumers;
poziva Komisijo, naj natančneje pregleda „ekonomijo kapljanja“ (trickle-down economics) pri analiziranju morebitnih zlorab vodilnih položajev, če ugotovi, da niso bili zlorabljeni;
Urges the Commission to take a closer look at trickle-down economics when analysing possible abuses of dominant positions, when it discovers that the dominant position has not been abused;
meni, da je uporaba vse višjih glob kot edini protimonopolni instrument morda neučinkovita glede na izgube delovnih mest, ki bi jih utegnila povzročiti nezmožnost izplačil, in poziva k razvoju širšega obsega bolj razvitih instrumentov, ki bodo obsegali vprašanja, kot so individualna odgovornost, preglednost in odgovornost podjetij, krajši postopki, pravica do zagovora in predpisanega postopka, mehanizmi za zagotovitev učinkovite obravnave prošenj za prizanesljivost (zlasti, da bi odpravili motnje, ki so jih povzročili postopki odkrivanja v ZDA), podjetniški programi za zagotavljanje skladnosti ter razvoj evropskih standardov; podpira pristop nagrajevanja in kaznovanja, ki bi učinkovito odvračal zlasti večkratne kršitelje, hkrati pa bi spodbujal delovanje po predpisih;
Believes that the use of ever higher fines as the sole antitrust instrument may be too blunt, not least in view of the job losses that may result from an inability to make payments, and calls for the development of a wider range of more sophisticated instruments covering such issues as individual responsibility, transparency and accountability of firms, shorter procedures, the right of defence and due process, mechanisms to ensure the effective operation of leniency applications (in particular to overcome the interference caused by discovery processes in the US), corporate compliance programmes and the development of European standards; favours a ‘carrot-and-stick’ approach with penalties that serve as an effective deterrent, in particular for repeat offenders, while encouraging compliance;