natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
Varuh človekovih pravic lahko pripravi kritično oceno tudi, če meni, da osnutek priporočila ne bi bil učinkovit ali kadar zadevna institucija ne sprejme osnutka priporočila, vendar nepravilnost ne upravičuje priprave posebnega poročila za Parlament.
The Ombudsman can also make a critical remark when he considers that a draft recommendation would not be effective or in cases where the institution concerned does not accept a draft recommendation but the instance of maladministration does not justify drawing up a special report for Parliament.
Vseeno kritična ocena služi kot potrdilo pritožniku, da je njegova pritožba upravičena, zadevni instituciji pa nakaže, kje je storila napako, kar pripomore k preprečevanju nepravilnosti v prihodnje.
A critical remark nevertheless functions as confirmation for the complainant that his complaint was justified and it clearly indicates to the institution concerned where it has acted wrongly, so that it can avoid such action in the future.
Leta 2010 je varuh človekovih pravic pripravil le 33 kritičnih ocen za institucije v primerjavi s 35 leta 2009 in 44 leta 2008.
In 2010 the Ombudsman made critical remarks to the institutions in only 33 cases, down from 35 in 2009 and 44 in 2008.
Vendar meni, da še vedno obstaja možnost izboljšanja.
Still he considers there is room for improvement.
Dodatne pripombe, ki jih varuh človekovih pravic uporablja v primerih, kjer je priložnost za izboljšanje kakovosti uprave, so bile pripravljene v 14 zadevah (28 leta 2009).
Further remarks, an instrument the Ombudsman uses when in dealing with a case he identifies an opportunity to enhance the quality of the administration, were made in 14 cases (28 in 2009).
Dodatne pripombe varuha človekovih pravic niso namenjene kritiziranju zadevne institucije, ampak jih je treba obravnavati kot usmeritev in nasvet, kako bi lahko institucija izboljšala kakovost storitev.
Further remarks by the Ombudsman are not intended to criticise the institution concerned but should be taken as guidance and advice on how the institution could improve the quality of its service.
Da bi bila javnost obveščena in da bi se institucije učile iz svojih napak, varuh človekovih pravic vsako leto na svoji spletni strani objavi študijo o nadaljnjih ukrepih institucij na podlagi njegovih kritičnih ocen in dodatnih pripomb ter pozove institucije k odzivu.
To inform the public and to ensure that the institutions learn from their mistakes the Ombudsman each year publishes on his website a study on the institutions' follow-up to his critical and further remarks and he also invites the institutions to react.
Najnovejša študija za leto 2009 je pokazala, da znaša splošna stopnja zadovoljivih nadaljnjih ukrepov 81 % (94 % v primeru dodatnih pripomb in 70 % pri kritičnih ocenah).
The latest study, covering 2009, showed that the overall rate of satisfactory follow-up was 81% (94% in the case of further remarks and 70% for the critical remarks).
Čeprav je ta delež v celoti spodbuden, bi se lahko zlasti pri kritičnih ocenah dodatno izboljšal.
Although the overall rate is encouraging the rate for critical remarks in particular leaves room for improvement.
Varuh človekovih pravic je leta 2010 ugotovil nepravilnosti v 12 % zaključenih zadev (40).
The Ombudsman identified instances of maladministration in 12% of cases closed (40) in 2010.
Pozitiven rezultat za pritožnika je dosegel v sedmih zadevah, in sicer s pripravo osnutkov priporočil, ki so bili sprejeti.
He obtained a positive outcome for the complainant in seven cases by making draft recommendations that were accepted.
Varuh človekovih pravic je leta 2010 izdal 16 novih osnutkov priporočil.
The Ombudsman issued 16 new draft recommendations in 2010.
Osnutek priporočila se izda, če zadevna institucija lahko odpravi nepravilnosti ali kadar so izjemno hude ali imajo splošne posledice.
A draft recommendation is issued in cases where it is possible for the institution concerned to eliminate an instance of maladministration or in cases where the maladministration is serious or has general implications.
Če zadevna institucija prejme osnutek priporočila, mora v skladu s Pogodbo v treh mesecih poslati varuhu človekovih pravic podrobno mnenje.
In the event of a draft recommendation the institution concerned is obliged under the Treaty to send a detailed opinion to the Ombudsman within three months.
Če se institucija EU na osnutek priporočila ne odzove zadovoljivo, lahko varuh človekovih pravic pripravi posebno poročilo in ga posreduje Evropskemu parlamentu.
If an EU institution fails to respond satisfactorily to a draft recommendation the Ombudsman can draw up and send a special report for the European Parliament.
Posebno poročilo je skrajni ukrep in zadnji korak varuha človekovih pravic, ki ga stori pri obravnavi pritožbe.
A special report is the Ombudsman's instrument of last resort and constitutes the last step the Ombudsman takes in dealing with a complaint case.
Nato se Parlament odloči o sprejetju morebitnih dodatnih ukrepov, na primer pripravi resolucije.
From this point it is for the Parliament to decide on any further steps, such as drawing up a resolution.
Posebna poročila se predložijo Odboru za peticije, ki je pristojni odbor za odnose z varuhom človekovih pravic.
Special reports are submitted to the Committee on Petitions, which is the Committee responsible for the relations with the Ombudsman.
Varuh človekovih pravic je leta 2010 predložil Parlamentu eno posebno poročilo, in sicer po izvedeni preiskavi pritožbe o dostopu do dokumentov v zvezi z emisijami CO2 iz avtomobilov.
The Ombudsman submitted one special report to Parliament in 2010, following an inquiry into a complaint about access to documents relating to CO 2 emissions from cars.
V posebnem poročilu je poudaril, da Komisija skoraj 15 mesecev ni odgovorila na osnutek poročila, čeprav je po Pogodbi rok za odgovor tri mesece.
The special report pointed out that the Commission failed to reply to a draft recommendation for almost 15 months, although the deadline established by the Treaty is three months.
Prav tako ni izpolnila svoje zaveze do varuha človekovih pravic.
The Commission also failed to implement an undertaking it had made to the Ombudsman.
S temi nepravilnostmi je kršila svojo dolžnost lojalnega sodelovanja z varuhom človekovih pravic.
These failures constituted a breach of the Commission's duty of sincere co-operation with the Ombudsman.
Odbor za peticije je o tem posebnem poročilu varuha človekovih pravic pripravil poročilo
The Committee on Petitions drafted a report
Poročilo o posebnem poročilu evropskega varuha človekovih pravic po osnutku priporočila Evropski komisiji v pritožbi št. 676/2008/RT ( 2010/2086(INI) ).
Report on the Special Report by the European Ombudsman following his draft recommendation to the European Commission in complaint 676/2008RT ( 2010/2086(INI) ).
Sprejeta besedila: A7-0293/2010 (poročevalka: Hrisula Paliadeli (Chrysoula Paliadeli), podpredsednica odbora), ki ga je Parlament sprejel 27. oktobra 2010.
Adopted text: A7-0293/2010 on the Ombudsman's special report (rapporteur: Chrysoula Paliadeli, Vice-Chair), which was adopted by Parliament on 27 October 2010.
V zvezi s tematiko pritožb očitno izstopa vprašanje dostopa javnosti do dokumentov institucij EU, ki je bilo vključeno v letno poročilo varuha človekovih pravic in je sprožilo veliko pritožb.
As regards the themes of complaints the Ombudsman's Annual Report public access to documents of EU institutions stands out clearly and triggered a large amount of complaints.
Dostop do dokumentov je namreč zadevalo 33 % vseh preiskav, zaključenih leta 2010.
33% of all inquiries closed in 2010 concerned access to documents.
Institucije morajo v skladu s Pogodbo zaradi spodbujanja dobrega upravljanja in zagotovitve sodelovanja civilne družbe opravljati svoje delo čim bolj odprto.
Institutions are bound by the Treaty to conduct their work as openly as possible in order to promote good governance and ensure the participation of civil society.
Pravico dostopa do dokumentov institucij določata člen 15(3) PDEU in člen 42 Listine o temeljnih pravicah.
Article 15(3) TFEU and Article 42 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights provide for a right of access to documents of the institutions.
To pravico je uveljavila Uredba št. 1049/2001.
This right is implemented in Regulation 1049/2001.
Varuh človekovih pravic je vedno neomajno zagovarjal pravico do dostopa do dokumentov EU in je večkrat bistveno prispeval k razpravi o pregledu Uredbe št. 1049/2001.
The Ombudsman has always been a staunch defender of the right of access to EU documents and he has on various occasions made important contributions to the discussion concerning the review of Regulation 1049/2001.
Leta 2010 je zaključil 22 preiskav pritožb v zvezi z uporabo te uredbe.
In 2010 the Ombudsman completed 22 inquiries into complaints concerning the application of Regulation 1049/2001.
Posebno poročilo, ki ga je leta 2010 prejel Parlament, je dejansko izhajalo iz pritožbe o zavrnitvi zagotavljanja dostopa do dokumentov.
In fact the special report sent to the Parliament in 2010 resulted from a case that started off with a complaint on refusal to give access to documents.
Varuh človekovih pravic ima tudi pravico, da pregleda vsebino analiz in sklepov, ki jih pripravi Komisija pri preiskavi pritožb o kršitvah.
The Ombudsman also has the right to review the substance of the analyses and conclusions reached by the Commission when investigating infringement complaints.
Preveri lahko na primer, ali so smiselne, dobro argumentirane ter pritožnikom v celoti in jasno obrazložene.
He may check for example whether they are reasonable, well argued and explained fully and clearly to complainants.
V 70 % vseh zadev, obravnavanih leta 2010, je lahko varuh človekovih pravic pomagal pritožnikom tako, da je sam začel preiskavo, posredoval pritožbo pristojnemu organu EU ali nacionalnemu organu ali svetoval pritožniku, na koga naj jo naslovi.
In 70% of all cases processed in 2010 the Ombudsman was able to help complainants by opening an inquiry himself, by transferring the complaint to a competent EU or national body or by advising the complainant where to turn.
Pritožbe, ki ne sodijo v mandat varuha človekovih pravic, lahko v večini primerov najbolje obravnava nacionalni ali regionalni varuh.
Complaints which are not within the Ombudsman's mandate can in many cases best be handled by a national or a regional ombudsman.
1435 pritožb, vloženih leta 2010, je sodilo v pristojnost člana evropske mreže varuhov človekovih pravic, katerega polnopravni član je tudi Odbor za peticije.
In 2010 1 435 complaints were within the mandate of a member of the European Network of Ombudsmen of which the Committee on Petitions is a full member.
Leta 2010 je varuh človekovih pravic prenesel 145 pritožb na Odbor za peticije, druge pritožbe (601) pa so bile prenesene na Komisijo (176) ter na druge institucije in organe, vključno z mrežo SOLVIT.
In 2010 the Ombudsman transferred 145 complaints to the Committee on Petitions, while other complaints (601) were transferred to the Commission (176) and other institutions and bodies, including SOLVIT.
V letnem poročilu za leto 2010 je posebna pozornost posvečena novi strategiji, ki sta jo pripravila varuh človekovih pravic in njegovo osebje za mandat 2009–2014.
In the Annual Report 2010 special attention is drawn to the new strategy the Ombudsman and his staff have formulated for his mandate 2009-2014.
Cilji te strategije so:
The objectives are:
• prisluhniti zainteresiranim stranem s pridobitvijo povratnih informacij od pritožnikov, širjenjem in poglabljanjem stikov z institucijami EU in civilno družbo ter opredeljevanjem najboljših praks;
• To listen to stakeholders by obtaining feedback from complainants, broadening and deepening contacts with the EU institutions and civil society, and identifying best practices.
• hitreje dosegati rezultate s skrajšanjem časa, potrebnega za zaključek preiskav, ter poenostavljanjem postopkov za spodbujanje hitrega razreševanja pritožb;
• To deliver results faster by reducing the time needed to close inquiries and by developing simplified procedures to promote rapid resolutions of complaints.
• pozitivno vplivati na upravno kulturo institucij EU s prispevanjem k izboljšanju upravnih praks in osredotočanjem na sistemske težave;
• To impact positively on EU institutions' administrative culture by helping to improve administrative practices and focusing on systemic problems.
• z boljšo komunikacijo zagotavljati pravočasne in koristne informacije zainteresiranim stranem in javnosti;
• To provide timely and useful information to stakeholders and the public by communicating better.
• ponovno preučiti uporabo sredstev in uveljaviti najvišje standarde uprave v institucijah.
• To rethink how resources are being used and applying the highest standards of administration in the institution.
Institucija varuha človekovih pravic, katere kadrovski načrt zajema 64 delovnih mest (20 uradnikov in 44 začasnih uslužbencev) in katere proračun znaša približno 9 milijonov EUR, bo uporabila to novo strategijo kot podporo in usmeritev za svoje ukrepe, ki so namenjeni omogočanju državljanom EU, da v celoti uveljavijo svoje pravice, in izboljševanju kakovosti uprave EU.
The Ombudsman institution, which currently has an establishment plan of 64 posts (20 officials and 44 temporary agents) and a budget of around 9 million euros, will use this new strategy to underpin and guide its actions, which are aimed at ensuring that EU citizens enjoy their rights fully and at enhancing the quality of the EU administration.
o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost
on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges
MNENJE Odbora za pravne zadeve ...........................................................................19
OPINION of the Committee on Legal Affairs ......................................................20
- ob upoštevanju Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah, členov 2, 3 in 6 Pogodbe o Evropski uniji in ustreznih členov Pogodbe o delovanju Evropske unije (PDEU),
- having regard to the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to Articles 2, 3 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, and to the relevant Articles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU),
- ob upoštevanju Evropske varnostne strategije
- having regard to the 2003 European Security Strategy
Varna Evropa v boljšem svetu - Evropska varnostna strategija, ki jo je 12. decembra 2003 v Bruslju odobril Evropski svet in ki je bila sestavljena v skladu s pristojnostmi visokega predstavnika EU Javierja Solane iz leta 2003 in poročila o njenem izvajanju
A Secure Europe in a Better World - The European Security Strategy, Approved by the European Council held in Brussels on 12 December 2003 and drafted under the responsibilities of the EU High Representative Javier Solana and its implementation report of 2008
Poročilo o izvajanju evropske varnostne strategije – Zagotavljanje varnosti v spreminjajočem se svetu S 407/08 iz leta 2008,
Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy - Providing Security in a Changing World, S 407/08 ,
- ob upoštevanju Okvirnega sklepa Sveta 2002/475/PNZ z dne 13. junija 2002 o boju proti terorizmu
- having regard to Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism
3. , kakor je spremenjen z Okvirnim sklepom Sveta 2008/919/PNZ
3. as amended by Framework Decision 2008/919/JHA
- ob upoštevanju strategije Evropske unije za boj proti terorizmu
- having regard to the 2005 EU Counter-Terrorism Strategy
Dokument Sveta 14469/4/05. iz leta 2005,
Council Document 14469/4/05. ,
- ob upoštevanju strategije Evropske unije za boj proti radikalizaciji in novačenju za terorizem
- having regard to the EU Strategy for Combating Radicalisation and Recruitment to Terrorism
Dokument Sveta 14781/1/05.
Council Document 14781/1/05.
Strategija je bila revidirana novembra 2008.
The Strategy was revised in November 2008.
Dokument Sveta 15175/08. ,
Council Document 15175/08. ,
- ob upoštevanju stockholmskega programa – odprta in varna Evropa, ki služi državljanom in jih varuje
- having regard to the Stockholm Programme - An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens
- ob upoštevanju poročila Europola o stanju in trendih na področju terorizma v EU za leto 2011 (TE-SAT 2011);
- having regard to the Europol EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report for 2011 (TE‑SAT 2011),
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in Sveta z dne 20. julija 2010 o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost ( KOM(2010)0386 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council of 20 July 2010 on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges ( COM(2010)0386 ),
- ob upoštevanju mnenja evropskega varuha osebnih podatkov z dne 24. novembra 2010 o sporočilu o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost
- having regard to the Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor of 24 November 2010 on the Communication on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges
UL C 56, 22.2.2011, str.
OJ C 56, 22.2.2011, p.
- ob upoštevanju mnenja Evropskega ekonomsko-socialnega odbora o sporočilu o politiki EU za boj proti terorizmu: glavni dosežki in izzivi za prihodnost
- having regard to the Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication on the EU Counter-Terrorism Policy: main achievements and future challenges
- ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije Evropskemu parlamentu in Svetu za naslovom „Izvajanje strategije notranje varnosti EU: pet korakov k varnejši Evropi“ ( KOM(2010)0673 ),
- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the EU Internal Security Strategy in Action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe ( COM(2010)0673 ),
- ob upoštevanju Konvencije Sveta Evrope iz leta 1983 o odškodnini žrtvam nasilnih kaznivih dejanj (CETS št. 116), Konvencije Sveta Evrope iz leta 2005 o preprečevanju terorizma (CETS št. 196), smernic Sveta Evrope iz leta 2005 o zaščiti žrtev terorističnih dejanj, priporočila Sveta Evrope št. 8 iz leta 2006 o pomoči žrtvam kaznivih dejanj in predloga Komisija iz leta 2011 za direktivo o določitvi minimalnih standardov na področju pravic, podpore in zaščite žrtev kaznivih dejanj ( KOM(2011)0275 ),
- having regard to the 1983 Council of Europe Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes (CETS No. 116), the 2005 Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 196), the 2005 Council of Europe Guidelines on the Protection of Victims of Terrorist Acts, the 2006 Council of Europe Recommendation (2006)8 on Assistance to Crime Victims, and the 2011 Commission proposal for a Directive establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime ( COM(2011)0275 ),
- ob upoštevanju vmesnega pregleda 7. okvirnega programa za raziskave in zelene knjige z naslovom „Spremeniti izzive v priložnosti: na poti k skupnemu, strateškemu okviru za financiranje raziskav in inovacij v EU“,
- having regard to the mid-term review of the 7th Framework Programme for Research and to the Green Paper entitled "From challenges to opportunities: towards a common strategic framework for EU research and innovation funding",
- ob upoštevanju svojih številnih resolucij o boju proti terorizmu,
- having regard to its various resolutions related to counter-terrorism,
- ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (ES) št. 2580/2001 o posebnih omejevalnih ukrepih za nekatere osebe in subjekte zaradi boja proti terorizmu
- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism
70. in Skupnega stališča Sveta 2001/931/SZVP z dne 27. decembra 2001 o uporabi posebnih ukrepov za boj proti terorizmu
70. , and to Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism
- ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za državljanske svoboščine, pravosodje in notranje zadeve ter mnenj Odbora za zunanje zadeve in Odbora za pravne zadeve ( A7-0286/2011 ),
- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Legal Affairs ( A7-0286/2011 ),
A. ker je prvo desetletje 21. stoletja, ki je sledilo okrutnim napadom 11. septembra 2001, zaznamovala „vojna proti terorizmu“, zlasti kar zadeva pristop ZDA; čeprav se ti in drugi napadi podobnega obsega niso zgodili na evropskih tleh, so načrtovanje in priprave teh napadov potekali deloma v Evropi in smo jih vsi Evropejci občutili kot napad na naše vrednote in naš način življenja,
A. whereas after the atrocious attacks of 11 September 2001 the first decade of the 21st century has been marked by the ‘War on Terrorism’, especially with regard to the U.S. approach; whereas, although these attacks or other attacks of similar magnitude did not take place on European soil, the planning and preparation of the attacks took place partially in Europe, and many Europeans felt them to be an attack on their values and their way of life,
B. ker je Evropska unija v 21. stoletju vse pomembnejša tarča in žrtev terorizma in se sooča s stalno grožnjo,
B. whereas the European Union has been a greater target for, and victim of, terrorism in the 21st century and faces an ever present threat,
C. ker so imeli hudi teroristični napadi na ozemlju EU po napadih v ZDA 11. septembra, vključno s terorističnim napadom leta 2004 v Madridu in napadom leta 2005 v Londonu, velik vpliv na občutek splošne varnosti med državljani EU,
C . whereas severe terrorist attacks on EU soil since the 9/11 attacks in the United States, including the 2004 terrorist attacks in Madrid and the 2005 attacks in London, have had a significant impact on the sense of common security among EU citizens ,
D. ker poročilo Europola o stanju in trendih na področju terorizma v EU za leto 2011 (TE-SAT 2011) kaže na dejstvo, da ostaja tveganje terorističnih napadov v EU veliko in da se krepi povezava med terorizmom in organizirano kriminaliteto, ter na trend zmanjševanja terorističnih napadov, za katere sprejmejo odgovornost separatistične teroristične organizacije ali so njim pripisani, v primerjavi z letom 2006, kljub temu, da je tovrstna še vedno večina vseh terorističnih napadov v Evropi;
D . w hereas the Europol 2011 EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TE-SAT 2011) indicates that the threat of terrorist attacks in the EU remains serious, and that the links between terrorism and organised crime appear to be growing, and points to the fact that there is a decreasing trend of terrorist attacks claimed or attributed to separatist terrorist organisations as compared with 2006, although they still account for the majority of overall terrorist attacks in the EU ,
E. ker stockholmski program opredeljuje dve grožnji notranji varnosti, mednarodni terorizem in organizirani kriminal, in ker sta v mnogih primerih ti dve grožnji prisotni na istih področjih dejavnosti, na primer v trgovini z orožjem in trgovini z mamili,
E. whereas the Stockholm Programme identifies two threats to internal security – international terrorism and organised crime – which, in many cases, operate in the same areas of activity, such as arms and drugs trafficking for example,