natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ugotavlja z veliko zaskrbljenostjo, da EU od leta 2000 naprej pestijo počasna gospodarska rast in rast zaposlovanja, prenos dobičkov iz višje storilnosti z delavcev na delodajalce, pa tudi vztrajno visoka stopnja brezposelnosti, revščine, socialne izključenosti, nestalnih delovnih mest in razlik v dohodkih; ugotavlja, da je dobiček kot delež BDP na območju eura trenutno blizu najvišji stopnji vsaj v zadnjih 25 letih, medtem ko je delež plač iz desetletja v desetletje nižji;
Notes with deep concern that since 2000 the EU has been plagued by sluggish economic and employment growth, a transfer of productivity gains from workers to employers and the persistence of high levels of unemployment, poverty, social exclusion, precarious work and income inequality; notes that, in contrast, the profit share as a proportion of GDP in the Euro area is currently close to its highest for at least 25 years, whilst the wage share has been declining decade by decade;
ugotavlja, da je povprečna gospodarska rast v EU-15 iz desetletja v desetletje počasnejša; opozarja, da je od leta 2000 povprečna gospodarska rast v EU znašala 1,4%, kar je manj od 2,6-odstotne rasti v obdobju 1991-2000; ugotavlja, da napovedi kažejo na novo upočasnitev gospodarske rasti po letu 2006, tako da okrevanje ne bi smelo biti samoumevno;
Notes that the average economic growth in EU-15 has decelerated decade after decade; recalls that since 2000 average economic growth in the EU has been 1.4%, below the 2.6% of the period 1991-2000; notes that forecasts point to a new deceleration of economic growth after 2006, showing that the recovery should not be taken for granted;
ugotavlja, da se je v obdobju 2000-2005 število brezposelnih v EU povečalo za en milijon, vzporedno z velikanskim porastom obsega nestalnega dela, več kot 4,7 milijona delavcev ima pogodbe za določen čas, vsaj še 1,1 milijon pa jih neprostovoljno dela s krajšim delovnim časom; poudarja, da bo stopnja nezaposlenosti še vedno znašala nesprejemljivih 17 milijonov brezposelnih v EU, tudi če se uresničijo napovedi, ki kažejo na zmanjšanje stopnje nezaposlenosti; ugotavlja, da ima 25 % delovne sile atipične pogodbe (za določen čas, za krajši delovni čas, pogodba brez zagotovitve dela (zero-hour), delo preko agencije, ki posreduje delo, ali pa samozaposlitev), oziroma celo 41 %, če upoštevamo še samozaposlene, kar kaže, kako nestalni so danes delovni pogoji v EU;
Notes that from 2000 to 2005 the EU's number of unemployed increased by one million, in parallel with a huge increase in precarious work, more than 4.7 million workers with fixed-term contracts and at least 1.1 million more in involuntary part-time jobs; stresses that, even if forecasts that point to a reduction in the unemployment rate are confirmed, it will still persist at an unacceptable level of 17 million unemployed in the EU; notes that 25% of the workforce are under atypical types of contract (fixed-term, part-time, on-call, zero-hour, temporary agencies and freelance), 41% if the self-employed are taken into account, which shows how precarious labour conditions have now become in the EU;
opozarja, da so se razlike v dohodkih od leta 2000 še povečale, količnik med 20 % najbogatejših in 20 % najrevnejših pa je narasel s 4,5:1 na 4,8:1; opozarja, da je po letu 2000 povprečna realna rast plač v EU padla na 0,7 % z 1,2 %, kolikor je znašala povprečna rast v obdobju 1995-2000; poudarja, da delavci od leta 2000 33 % svojih dobičkov iz višje storilnosti prenašajo k delodajalcem;
Points out that income inequalities have risen since 2000, the ratio between the 20% richest and the 20% poorest increased from 4.5:1 to 4.8:1; recalls that after 2000 average real wage growth in the EU dropped to 0.7% in comparison with the 1.2% average growth of the period 1995-2000; stresses that since 2000 workers have transferred 33% of their productivity gains to employers;
ugotavlja z globoko zaskrbljenostjo, da je stopnja prebivalstva na pragu revščine za EU-15 narasla s 15 % v letu 2000 na 17 % v letu 2004, kar pomeni skoraj 9 milijonov več revnih v bogatejših državah EU; poudarja, da je v EU okoli 72 milijonov ljudi pod pragom revščine, skoraj polovica njih pa je na robu trajne revščine, z nesprejemljivo visokim deležem revnih otrok in ostarelih;
Notes with deep concern that at-risk-of-poverty rates have increased from 15% in 2000 to 17% in 2004 for EU-15, which means an increase of almost 9 million poor in the richer countries of the EU; points out that in the EU there are about 72 million people below the poverty line and almost half of them at risk of persistent poverty, with an unacceptably high number of poor being children and elderly people;
Posledice neoliberalizma – potreben je prelom s trenutnimi ekonomskimi in monetarnimi politikami
The consequences of neoliberalism - a break is need ed with current economic and monetary policies
poudarja, da je lizbonska strategija, opredeljena na Evropskem svetu marca 2000 z jasno podporo večjih evropskih organizacij delodajalcev UNICE in ERT, v EU glavno orodje za spodbujanje liberalizacije in privatizacije javnih služb in storitev, prožnosti in prilagodljivosti trga dela, omejevanja rasti plač in odpiranja večjega dela storitev socialnega varstva, vključno s pokojninami in zdravstvom, zasebnim interesom; obžaluje, da je tako imenovana oživitev lizbonske strategije leta 2005 še bolj poudarila neoliberalno vsebino in opozarja, da so to vsebino vse države članice prenesle v konkretne nacionalne programe reform, s tem pa ogrozile socialno razsežnost in prezrle gospodarske, družbene in okoljske težave, s katerimi se soočajo različne države članice v EU;
Stresses that the Lisbon Strategy defined by the European Council of March 2000 – which had the clear support of the major European employers' organisations, UNICE and ERT – has been the main tool within the EU to promote the liberalisation and privatisation of public utilities and services, the flexibility and adaptability of labour markets, wage moderation and the opening-up to private interests of the bulk of social security provisions, including pensions and health; regrets that the so-called revival of the Lisbon Strategy in 2005 accentuates even more the neo-liberal content and recalls that this content has been translated into concrete national reform programmes by all Member States, putting at risk the social dimension and disregarding the economic, social and environmental problems faced by the different Member States in the EU;
poudarja, da so lizbonski program Skupnosti in nacionalni programi reform v okviru prenovljene lizbonske strategije instrumenti, s katerimi se bodo spodbujale in upravičevale iste strukturne reforme v vseh državah članicah, zlasti glede trga dela in socialnega varstva, kar bo imelo resne gospodarske in socialne posledice, ki jih bodo integrirane smernice in pakt stabilnosti in rasti še okrepili; meni, da bodo te reforme ogrozile pravice delavcev, upokojencev, uporabnikov javnih storitev in potrošnikov;
Stresses that the Community's Lisbon Programme and the national reform programmes in the framework of the revised Lisbon Strategy are a tool to provide national justification for and push forward the same structural reforms in all the Member States, in particular as regards the labour market and social security, which will have serious economic and social consequences, strengthened even more by the integrated guidelines and the Stability and Growth Pact; considers that these reforms will jeopardise the rights of workers, pensioners, public-service users and consumers;
je seznanjen z letnim poročilom Komisije o napredku in obžaluje njeno pristranskost pri glavnih prednostnih nalogah za sprostitev poslovnega potenciala in zasebnih vlaganj, ki jo kaže zlasti z:
Notes the Commission’s Annual Progress Report and regrets the bias that the Commission shows in its fundamental priorities towards unlocking business potential and private investment, in particular by:
(i) upravičevanjem nadaljnje privatizacije socialnega varstva, zmanjševanja socialnih ugodnosti in zviševanja zakonske in dejanske upokojitvene starosti,
(i) providing justification for further privatising social security, reducing social benefits and increasing the statutory and effective retirement age,
(ii) vztrajanjem pri povečevanju prožnosti trga dela z novim konceptom "prilagodljive varnosti" na enaki ravni z "zaposljivostjo", v skladu s priporočili zelene knjige Komisije o delovnem pravu,
(ii) insisting on further flexibility in the labour market with the new concept of ‘flexicurity’ on a par with ‘employability’, in line with the recommendations of the Commission's Green Paper on Labour Law,
(iii) vezavo naložb v raziskave, razvoj in izobraževanje na muhe prostega trga in s tem upravičevanjem pridobitnega izkoriščanja znanja, izobraževanja in raziskav (bolonjski proces),
(iii) connecting investment in research and development and education to the whims of the free market and thus justifying the commoditisation of knowledge, education and research (Bologna process),
(iv) vztrajanjem pri liberalizaciji energetskih trgov in dajanjem prevelike prednosti dokončanju notranjega trga storitev;
(iv) insisting on the liberalisation of the energy markets and giving overarching priority to the conclusion of the internal market in services;
poudarja, da je bila lizbonska strategija pri doseganju napovedanih ciljev triodstotne povprečne gospodarske rasti, polne zaposlenosti z ustvaritvijo 20 milijonov novih delovnih mest in globalnih izdatkov za raziskave in razvoj v višini 3 % BDP Skupnosti v precejšnji meri neuspešna; ugotavlja, da po podatkih Komisije povprečna gospodarska rast znaša skoraj polovico ciljne, da je bila od načrtovanega števila delovnih mest ustvarjena približno četrtina (brez upoštevanja kakovosti ustvarjenih delovnih mest, porasta delovne sile in velikega števila brezposelnih) in da so izdatki za raziskave in razvoj pri manj kot 2 % BDP ostali na enaki ravni kot leta 2000;
Stresses that the Lisbon Strategy has been largely unsuccessful in achieving its proclaimed goals of average economic growth of 3%, full employment by creating 20 million new jobs and achieving an overall R&D expenditure of 3% of Community GDP; notes that, according to Commission data, the average economic growth has been almost half the target rate, the number of jobs created have been about a quarter of the target (without taking into account the quality of the jobs created, the growth of the labour force and the existing high unemployment figure) and R&D expenditure has been below 2% of GDP at the same level as in 2000;
poudarja, da tekoči proces liberalizacije trgov in privatizacije javnih služb ni obrodil vidnih sadov, kar zadeva cene, kakovost storitev ali zmanjšanje javne porabe; nasprotno ugotavlja, da potrošniške organizacije in organizacije uporabnikov javnih storitev poročajo o povišanju cen, znižanju kakovosti storitev in povečanju stroškov oskrbe; poleg tega ugotavlja, da je liberalizacija prispevala k zmanjšanju števila delovnih mest v prizadetih sektorjih in k ustvarjanju zasebnih monopolov, ki ogrožajo pravice delavcev, uporabnikov javnih storitev in potrošnikov;
Stresses that the ongoing process of liberalising markets and privatising public utilities has not brought any visible gains in terms of prices, service quality or a reduction in public expenditure; notes, on the contrary, that consumers’ and public-service users’ associations have reported price increases, a drop in the level of service quality and increases in the cost of provision; notes, furthermore, that liberalisation has contributed to the destruction of jobs in the sectors affected and the creation of private monopolies that put the rights of workers, public-service users and consumers at risk;
meni, da sta bili monetarna in davčna politika v EU omejevalni, z glavnim ciljem cenovne stabilnosti in konsolidacije proračuna v skladu s paktom stabilnosti in rasti; poudarja, da je proces nominalnega bližanja tekom priprav na euro in kasneje negativno vplival na gospodarsko rast in rast zaposlovanja, socialno in gospodarsko kohezijo in realno bližanje med državami članicami EU ter na javne naložbe, kar je ogrozilo trenutno šibko gospodarsko okrevanje in boj proti nezaposlenosti;
Considers that monetary and fiscal policy in the EU has been restrictive, with its overarching objective of price stability and budget consolidation in line with the Stability and Growth Pact; stresses that the process of nominal convergence towards the Euro and what followed has had a negative impact on economic and employment growth, on social and economic cohesion and real convergence between the Member States of the EU, on public investment, putting at risk the current meagre economic recovery and the fight against unemployment;
opozarja na globoko zakoreninjen boj in odpor delavcev, potrošnikov in uporabnikov javnih storitev proti trenutnemu procesu liberalizacije in reformam dela in socialnega varstva, ter poziva spomladanski Evropski svet, naj to upošteva in uporabi predloge sindikatov, zvez uporabnikov javnih storitev in organizacij potrošnikov;
Draws attention to the deep-rooted struggle and resistance of workers, consumers and public-service users against the ongoing process of liberalisation and labour and social security reforms, and calls on the Spring European Council to take this into account and incorporate the proposals being put forward by trade unions, public-service users’ associations and consumer organisations;
obžaluje dogovor, sklenjen na Evropskem svetu decembra 2005 o finančni perspektivi za obdobje 2007-2013, zlasti glede omejitev za strukturne sklade (z 0,41 % BND EU na 0,37 %) in za socialne, okoljske, raziskovalne, kulturne in izobraževalne programe; obžaluje, da so se cilji spremenili v skladu s prednostnimi nalogami iz neratificirane "Evropske ustave" na področju konkurence, varnosti in militarizacije, zlasti namenitev vsaj 2/3 zneskov iz kohezijske politike za financiranje lizbonskih ciljev; meni, da je povprečna raven izdatkov 1,045 % BND EU bistveno premalo za reševanje socialnih, gospodarskih in okoljskih izzivov, s katerimi se sooča razširjena EU, in njenih potreb po povezovanju;
Regrets the agreement reached by the December 2005 European Council on the financial perspective for 2007-2013, in particular the reductions in the structural funds (from 0.41% of EU GNI to 0.37%) and in the social, environment, research, culture and education programmes; regrets the shift of objectives in line with the priorities stated in the non-ratified 'European Constitution' on competition/competitiveness, security and militarisation, in particular the earmarking of at least 2/3 of the amounts of cohesion policy to finance the Lisbon objectives; considers that an average expenditure level 1.045% of EU GNI is far from sufficient to cope with the social, economic and environmental challenges facing the enlarged EU and its cohesion needs;
opozarja na zmanjšanje proračuna EU, kot je bilo že vidno v zadnji finančni perspektivi za obdobje 2000-2006 (Agenda 2000), kjer se zgornja meja za lastna sredstva ohranila kljub pristopu 10 novih članic z dohodki na prebivalca pri približno 40 % te vrednosti na ravni EU; obžaluje, da je proračun za leto 2007 sledil enakemu trendu kot proračuni od leta 1997, in sicer da znižuje višino proračunskih izdatkov EU na približno 1 % BND EU ter pod zgornje mejne vrednosti finančnih perspektiv; opozarja, da je zvezni proračun ZDA približno 18 do 20 % njihovega BND, različni ekonomisti pa kažejo na dvakrat ali celo štirikrat višje vrednosti za proračun EU, če naj opazno prispeva k naložbam in prerazporeditvi v EU;
Points out that the reduction in the weight of the EU budget, as already started in the last financial perspectives for 2000-2006 (Agenda 2000), where the own resource ceiling was maintained for the first time in spite of the enlargement to 10 new countries with an income per inhabitant of about 40% of the EU level; regrets that the 2007 budget has followed the same trend as the budgets since 1997 of reducing the level of EU budget expenditure to a value near 1% of EU GNI and below the ceilings of the financial perspectives; recalls that the US federal budget is about 18/20% of its GNI and that various economists point to levels two- and fourfold higher for the EU budget if it is to make a meaningful contribution to investment and redistribution inside the EU;
Nova strategija, nova pot za Evropo – polna zaposlenost, dostojne službe in plače, socialna in gospodarska kohezija ter socialna zaščita za vse
A new strategy, a new path for Europe - full employment, decent jobs, living wages, social and economic cohesion and social protection for all
meni, da je potreben prelom s sedanjimi politikami EU, če želimo res rešiti težave trajnostne gospodarske rasti, nezaposlenosti, revščine, socialnega izključevanja in razlik (v dohodkih); poudarja, da je potrebna nova strategija za novo evropsko pot, pot polne zaposlenosti, dostojnih služb in plač, socialne in gospodarske kohezije ter socialne zaščite za vse, kar zagotavlja najvišje življenjske standarde; pot, ki upošteva razvojne potrebe vsake države članice, še zlasti manj razvitih, ki spodbuja dejansko bližanje, in ki prispeva k zmanjšanju razvojnih razlik med državami članicami in obstoječih gospodarskih, socialnih in regijskih neskladij;
Considers that a break is needed with current EU polices if we wish effectively to address the problems of sustainable economic growth, unemployment, poverty, social exclusion and (income) inequalities; stresses that a new strategy is needed to set a new path for Europe, a path of full employment, decent jobs, living wages, social and economic cohesion and social protection for all that guarantees the highest living standards; a path that pays heed to the development needs of each Member State, in particular the less developed, that promotes real convergence and helps reduce the development gap between Member States and existing economic, social and regional disparities;
meni, da mora EU na vrh svoje politične liste postaviti vprašanja ustvarjanja bogastva (večja storilnost), prerazporeditve (boj proti razlikam v dohodkih) in izključevanja (boj proti nezaposlenosti); ugotavlja, da je za rešitev vseh teh težav osrednje vprašanje "dela";
Considers that the EU must place at the top of its political agenda the questions of wealth creation (increased productivity), redistribution (the fight against income inequalities) and exclusion (the fight against unemployment); notes the key role of 'work' in addressing all these questions;
zato poziva k nadomestitvi lizbonske strategije z "evropsko strategijo za solidarnost in trajnostni razvoj", ki bo temeljila na zgoraj omenjenih načelih in vsebovala nove gospodarske, socialne in okoljske ukrepe, ki bodo spodbujali naložbe v:
Calls, therefore, for the Lisbon Strategy to be replaced by a ‘ European Strategy for Solidarity and Sustainable Development ’ based on the abovementioned principles, with a new set of economic, social and environmental policies that encourages investment:
(i) kakovost dela v vseh pogledih (plače, stabilnost, delovni pogoji in usposabljanje) ter izboljšanje izobraževanja za pridobivanje zelo usposobljene in kvalificirane delovne sile,
(i) in the quality of work in all its aspects (wages, stability, working conditions and training) and improving qualifications, in order to achieve a highly trained and skilled workforce,
(ii) osnovno infrastrukturo in infrastrukturo, ki podpira industrijske dejavnosti,
(ii) in basic and industry-supportive infrastructure,
(iii) javne storitve za izboljšanje njihove kakovosti,
(iii) in public services, in order to improve their quality,
(iv) močno kohezijsko politiko, da bi spodbujali socialno in gospodarsko kohezijo,
(iv) in a strong cohesion policy, in order to promote social and economic cohesion,
(v) varstvo okolja in ekološke tehnologije,
(v) in the protection of the environment and in eco-technologies,
(vi) izboljšanje delovnih, socialnih, okoljskih in varnostnih standardov, ki bodo omogočali usklajevanje z najvišjimi standardi,
(vi) in improving labour, social, environmental and safety standards, in order to achieve harmonisation to meet the highest standards,
(vii) socialno gospodarstvo,
(vii) in the social economy,
(viii) socialno zaščito za izkoreninjenje revščine in boj proti socialni izključenosti,
(viii) in social protection, in order to eradicate poverty and fight against social exclusion,
(ix) (javne) raziskave in inovacije, da bi bile vsem zagotovljene koristi, ki izhajajo iz tega,
(ix) in (public) research and innovation, in order to guarantee its benefits to all,
(x) promocijo kulture in udeležbe javnosti,
(x) in the promotion of culture and civil participation,
poudarja, da ta nova strategija za EU potrebuje makroekonomski okvir, ki bo podpiral trajnostni razvoj, krepil okolju prijazno notranje povpraševanje, temelječe na napredni plačni politiki, podpiral polno zaposlovanje s pravicami ter socialno in gospodarsko kohezijo; v zvezi s tem terja denarne in davčne ukrepe, ki bodo podpirali rast in zaposlovanje in ki bodo pripeljali do kombinirane, prožne in usklajene ekspanzivne davčne politike EU in njenih držav članic, na temelju:
Stresses that this new strategy for the EU requires a macro-economic framework that is supportive of sustainable development, strengthened environment-friendly internal demand based on progressive wages, full employment with rights and social and economic cohesion; asks, in this context, for growth- and employment-supportive monetary and fiscal policies that lead to a combined, flexible and coordinated expansionary fiscal policy for the EU and its Member States, based on:
(i) sprostitve denarne politike ECB in njene institucionalne reforme, na podlagi demokratične odgovornosti, političnega nadzora in gospodarskih ter socialnih vidikov, ki se bo odražala v specifičnih ciljih rasti in zaposlovanja, ki jih je treba uvesti vzporedno s spremembo njenega splošnega cilja stabilnosti cen,
(i) a relaxation of monetary policy by the ECB and its institutional reform, based on democratic accountability, political control and economic and social concerns, translated in specific growth and employment-targeting to be introduced in parallel with a change in its overarching objective of price stability,
(ii) razveljavitve pakta stabilnosti in rasti vzporedno z uvedbo pakta zaposlovanja in rasti, ki bo spodbujal javne naložbe, povečal njihovo učinkovitost in določil konkretna gospodarska, socialna in okoljska merila, prirejena specifičnim potrebam vsake države članice, zlasti pa se bo osredotočil na zmanjšanje brezposelnosti,
(ii) the revocation of the Stability and Growth Pact in parallel with the establishment of an Employment and Growth Pact which will foster public investment, improve efficiency and set specific economic, social and environment criteria tailor-made to the particular needs of each Member State, in particular targeting unemployment reduction,
(iii) skladne evropske naložbene strategije z uvedbo "naložbenega programa EU za trajnostni razvoj in zaposlovanje", ki bo znašal vsaj 1 % BDP EU in ki naj bi dopolnil podobna prizadevanja držav članic na področju javnih naložb; poudarja, da mora finančna perspektiva za obdobje 2007-2013 voditi k dejanskemu porastu proračuna EU, da bi lahko prispevali k temu programu, ter poziva k njeni reviziji,
(iii) a coherent European investment strategy by creating an ‘EU investment programme for sustainable development and employment’ of at least 1% of EU GDP, which should complement Member States' similar public investment efforts; stresses that the financial perspectives for 2007-2013 must lead to a genuine increase in the EU budget in order to contribute to this programme and asks for its revision,
(iv) uvedbe sklada za finančna nadomestila v območju eura za odzivanje na asimetrične gospodarske krize;
(iv) the creation of a monetary compensation fund in the Euro area to react to asymmetric economic shocks;
poziva k novemu programu socialne politike z naslednjimi cilji:
Calls for a new social policy agenda whose objectives should be the following: