natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
poudarja, da je treba ustrezno zaščititi pravice intelektualne lastnine, in podpira pobudo za dostopen, varen in učinkovit patentni sistem, s katerim bi spodbujali naložbe in raziskovalna prizadevanja ter okrepili inovativne sposobnosti zlasti malih in srednjih podjetij; poziva vse tri institucije, naj si skupaj prizadevajo za dosego političnega soglasja o dejanskem izboljšanju patentnega sistema, ki bi državljanom omogočal korist od novih izdelkov in storitev po dostopnih cenah;
Underlines the need for an adequate level of protection of intellectual property rights and supports the initiative towards an affordable, secure and efficient patents system which would give incentives for investment and research efforts and foster capacity for innovation, in particular for SMEs; urges all three institutions to work together towards a political consensus on a real improvement of the patents system, whereby citizens can profit from new products and services at affordable prices;
ugotavlja, da tržni instrumenti vključujejo široko paleto političnih orodij, ki se vse bolj uporabljajo za doseganje okoljskih ciljev; meni, da tržni instrumenti, kot so na primer davki, dajatve in trgovanje z emisijami lahko pospešujejo uspešno razporejanje naravnih virov in v tem kontekstu prispevajo k uresničevanju ciljev lizbonskega programa;
Notes that market-based instruments (MBIs) include a wide range of policy tools that are increasingly being used to achieve environmental objectives; takes the view that MBIs such as taxes, charges and emissions trading can foster an efficient allocation of natural resources and can contribute, in this context, to achieving the goals of the Lisbon agenda;
ponavlja svoje stališče o prednostih preložitve davčnega bremena z dela na onesnaževanje okolja, saj bi bil to učinkovit način reševanja vprašanj v zvezi z okoljem, pa tudi z zaposlovanjem, ter meni, da je treba zmanjšati obremenitev dela, da bi ustvarili več delovnih mest in preprečili sivo ekonomijo;
Reiterates its view on the benefits of shifting the tax burden from labour to environmental degradation as an effective way to address both environmental and employment issues, and is of the opinion that the burden on labour must be diminished in order to create more jobs and fight the black economy;
ugotavlja, da je cilje varnosti oskrbe z energijo, zagotavljanja trajnostne mobilnosti in energije za evropske državljane po razumni ceni ter ohranjanja poštenih cen mogoče doseči z isto strategijo kot za ambiciozno zastavljeno varstvo podnebja;
Notes that the objectives of energy supply security and providing Europe’s citizens with reasonably priced, sustainable mobility and energy and maintaining fair prices can be achieved via the same strategy as ambitious climate protection;
zato poziva Komisijo, naj dosledno in hitro izvede sklepe s spomladanskega vrhunskega srečanja leta 2007 ter obnovljive vire energije in energetsko učinkovitost v resnici določi za prednostno nalogo skupne energetske politike;
Calls on the Commission, in consequence, to implement consistently and rapidly the decisions of the 2007 Spring Summit and to make renewable energy and energy efficiency the priorities in reality of a common energy policy;
poudarja, da je prehod na gospodarstvo z nizko porabo energije, ki bo temeljila na obnovljivih virih energije, pomembna naloga Evropske unije in drugih industrializiranih držav, in da je učinkovit način, kako se tega lotiti, uporaba tehnologij, ki so že na voljo, a je za njihovo uveljavljanje potrebno pogumno politično delovanje, vključno s spodbudami in z večstransko dogovorjenimi sankcijami za države, ki niso pripravljene prevzeti svojega dela bremena; poudarja, da se bodo Evropski uniji z nujnim prehodom v trajnostno gospodarstvo z nizko porabo energije in z nizkimi emisijami ogljika prek razvoja in uporabe nove tehnologije ponudile različne priložnosti;
Point out that a major task of the EU and the other industrialised countries is to switch to a low-energy-intensive economy based on renewable sources of energy, and that an efficient way of approaching this is the application of technologies which are already at hand, but for which we need bold policy action in order to implement them, including incentives and multilaterally agreed sanctions applying to those countries which are not ready to bear their share of the burden; emphasises that the necessary shift towards a sustainable, low-energy-intensive and low-carbon economy by means of the development and implementation of new technologies will create various opportunities for the EU;
poudarja pomen prometne politike pri premagovanju podnebnih sprememb in pri obravnavi širšega sklopa okoljskih vprašanj; poziva k politikam, ki z različnimi ukrepi zmanjšujejo nepotrebni prevoz, in priporoča, da se opravi ustrezna strateška okoljska ocena o vplivu vseevropskih prometnih omrežij;
Emphasises the importance of transport policy in fighting climate change and addressing a broader set of environmental concerns, advocates policies which reduce unnecessary transport through a variety of measures and calls for Trans-European Transport Networks to be subject to a proper strategic environmental impact assessment;
poziva države članice, naj v okviru učinkovite, trajnostne in okolju prijazne prometne politike hitro razširijo medsebojno povezana, interoperabilna vseevropska prometna omrežja, zlasti ob upoštevanju potreb novih držav članic; poziva Komisijo in države članice, naj uporabijo ustrezno kombinacijo politik, da bi v celoti izkoristile potencial okolju prijaznih, inteligentnih prevoznih sistemov in tehnoloških inovacij;
Calls on the Member States rapidly to expand the interconnected, interoperable Trans‑European Transport Networks with particular regard to the needs in the new Member States within an efficient, sustainable and environmentally friendly transport policy; calls on the Commission and the Member States to apply the appropriate policy mix in order fully to exploit the potential of environmentally friendly, intelligent transport systems and technological innovations;
poudarja, da je zato bistveno zagotoviti, da bo v prihodnje povpraševanje po logističnih storitvah združljivo z manjšim vplivom na okolje in nižjimi emisijami toplogrednih plinov; meni, da trajnostni prevoz temelji na zmožnosti političnih nosilcev odločanja na evropski, nacionalni in regionalni ravni, da zagotovijo učinkovite spodbude, na podlagi katerih si lahko kupci prevoza, prevozniki in proizvajalci vozil še naprej prizadevajo za ustvarjanje okolju prijaznejšega logističnega trga;
Points out that it is, therefore, crucial to ensure that future demand for logistics services is compatible with a smaller environmental impact and reduced greenhouse gas emissions; takes the view that sustainable transport relies on the ability of political decision-makers at the European, national and regional levels to provide efficient incentives for transport buyers, transporters and vehicle manufacturers to continue their efforts to create a more environmentally friendly logistics market;
Trg dela in vlaganje v ljudi
The labour market and investment in people
priznava, da se sicer kažejo koristi strategije Evropske unije za rast in zaposlovanje, vendar opozarja, da jih niso občutili vsi državljani Evropske unije; poudarja, da je pri obravnavanju globalizacije in demografskih sprememb nadvse pomembno, da se ljudem zagotovijo potrebne veščine in priložnosti, zato da se v večjem številu vključijo na trg dela in delo postane realna možnost za vse, zlasti prek ukrepov, usmerjenih na tiste, ki so najbolj oddaljeni od trga dela;
Recognises that the EU Strategy for Growth and Jobs is showing benefits, but stresses at the same time that not all EU citizens have benefited from these results; stresses that in order to face globalisation and the demographic challenge it is of the utmost importance to provide people with the necessary skills and opportunities in order attract more people into the labour market and make work a real option for everyone, especially through measures targeting people who are furthest away from the labour market;
poudarja, da mora za zagotovitev prostega pretoka in mobilnosti na trgu dela Svet nemudoma sprejeti direktive o organizaciji delovnega časa, delovnih pogojih za začasne delavce in prenosljivosti pokojninskih pravic ter revidirati direktivo o Evropskem svetu delavcev; poudarja, da je z odstranitvijo ovir za mobilnost na evropskem trgu dela omogočena večja zaščita evropske delovne sile; ugotavlja, da se mora EU potruditi in državljanom razložiti koristi pristopa, v katerem so učinkovito združene širitev, povezovanje, solidarnost in mobilnost delovne sile;
Stresses that in order to ensure free movement and mobility on the labour market the Council needs to adopt the directives on the organisation of working time, working conditions for temporary workers and portability of pension rights and to revise the European Work Council directive without delay; stresses that the removal of barriers to mobility on the European labour market allows greater protection for the European workforce; notes that the EU must make an effort to explain to citizens the benefits of an approach that effectively combines enlargement, integration, solidarity and labour mobility;
poudarja, da tako delodajalci kot delavci pogosteje zahtevajo prožne oblike dela, ki so glede na izziv demografskih sprememb dokazan način, kako povečati vključenost žensk v trg dela in podaljšati delovno življenje starejših; opozarja, da so izobraževanje, kvalifikacije in usposabljanje sestavni del najboljših visokokakovostnih zaposlovalnih politik in da je treba nameniti pozornost socialnim spodbudam za družine, vključno z infrastrukturo za varstvo otrok, ki je poleg ostalih pogojev nujna za povečanje vključenosti žensk v delo; podpira sprejetje uravnoteženih skupnih načel o prožni varnosti, v katerih bosta združena prožnost in varnost delavcev in delodajalcev na trgu dela; spodbuja države članice, naj ta skupna načela vključijo v posvetovanja o nacionalnih programih reform s socialnimi partnerji, in poudarja ključno vlogo ukrepov za uskladitev poklicnega in zasebnega življenja, spodbujanja enakih možnosti za vse, usposabljanja in prekvalifikacije, aktivne politike na trgu dela, ustrezne socialne zaščite in premagovanja segmentacije trga dela z zagotavljanjem pravice do zaposlitve za vse delavce;
Stresses that flexible working is increasingly demanded by both employers and employees, and that, in the face of the challenge of demographic change, it is a proven way to increase female participation, as well as to extend the working lives of older people; recalls that education, qualifications and training form part of high-quality employment and that attention needs to be paid to social incentives for families, including childcare infrastructure, which is one of the preconditions for increasing the labour participation of women; supports the adoption of a balanced set of common principles regarding flexicurity, combining flexibility and security for employees and employers on the labour market; encourages the Member States to mainstream these common principles in their NRP consultation with the social partners, and highlights the central role of work-life balance measures, the promotion of equal opportunities for all, training and retraining, active labour market policies, adequate social protection and the breakdown of labour market segmentation by ensuring employment rights for all workers;
priznava, da prožen in učinkovito delujoč trga dela prispeva k socialni vključenosti, saj ustvarja priložnosti za zaposlovanje vseh družbenih skupin; zato poziva države članice, naj liberalizirajo predpise o delovnih razmerjih in vlagajo v usposabljanje in aktivne politike trga dela ter tako ustvarijo najboljše možne pogoje za visoko zaposlenost in mobilnost dela;
Acknowledges the contribution of flexible and efficiently functioning labour markets to social inclusion through the creation of employment opportunities for all groups in society; urges the Member States, therefore, to liberalise employment regulations and invest in training and active labour market policies so as to create the best possible conditions for high employment and labour mobility;
z zaskrbljenostjo opaža trend povečevanja neenakosti porazdelitve dohodka in premoženja v državah članicah; meni, da bi lahko ta trend obrnili z ustreznimi nacionalnimi in evropskimi ukrepi, s katerimi bi dosegli, da bi bila družba bolj kohezivna in da bi se državljani zavedali, da imajo koristi od rasti;
Notes with concern the trend towards widening inequality of income and wealth in the Member States; believes that such a trend should be reversed by appropriate national and European action to achieve a more cohesive society and to ensure that citizens perceive that they are benefiting from growth;
ugotavlja, da so nekatere države članice uvedle koncept minimalne plače; meni, da bi drugim državam članicam lahko koristilo, če bi se seznanile z njihovimi izkušnjami;
Notes that some Member States have introduced the concept of a minimum wage; suggests that other Member States might benefit from studying their experience;
pozdravlja lizbonski program Skupnosti za obdobje 2008–2010, v katerem Komisija predlaga bolj prednosten program z zgolj desetimi ključnimi cilji, ki jih je mogoče doseči med letoma 2008 in 2010; vendar poudarja, da je glavna priložnost lizbonske strategije medsebojno povezati različne reformne zahteve ter gospodarske, okoljske in zaposlovalne instrumente v enem reformnem programu; zato poziva Komisijo, naj se drži tega skladnega in povezovalnega pristopa kombinacije politik ter ga naj ne razgradi v ločene politične ukrepe;
Welcomes the Commission Community Lisbon Programme 2008-2010 in that it proposes a more prioritised programme with only ten key objectives, which can be delivered during the period 2008-2010; underlines, however, that the major opportunity offered by the Lisbon Strategy is that of interconnecting different reform necessities and economic, environmental and employment instruments into one reform agenda; calls on the Commission, therefore, to stick to this coherent and integrative policy-mix approach and not to dismantle it by a move towards isolated policy measures;
Merjenje napredka in spremljanje lizbonske strategije
Measuring progress and monitoring Lisbon
odobrava prizadevanja Evropske komisije, da zmanjša birokracijo, s čemer želi zlasti pomagati malim in srednjim podjetjem in izboljšati oceno učinkov zakonodaje; obenem obžaluje, da Parlament in Komisija še nista dosegla dogovora glede vrste zahtevane presoje učinka; s tem v zvezi ponavlja poziv k neodvisnemu zunanjemu pregledu presoje učinka;
Welcomes the European Commission’s efforts to reduce bureaucracy, in particular with a view to helping small and medium-sized undertakings, and to improve legislative impact assessment; at the same time, deplores the fact that Parliament and the Commission have still not reached agreement on the type of impact assessment required; in that connection, reiterates its call for independent, external scrutiny of impact assessment;
odobrava cilj Komisije, da zmanjša upravno breme za podjetja; se veseli prejetja konkretnih podatkov o tem, kako poteka doseganje tega cilja ob zagotovljenih pogojih za dobro upravljanje; poudarja, da lahko k doseganju tega cilja prispevajo vse vladne službe, zato bi morale sodelovati pri ustreznih političnih odločitvah; v zvezi zmanjšanjem birokracije in poenostavitvijo zakonodaje poziva k jasnemu nadzoru, da se ugotovi, v kolikšni meri države članice dejansko izkoriščajo odstopanja, ki jih omogočajo evropski zakonodajni akti, ko gre za to, da se pri prenosu teh aktov upoštevajo nacionalne posebnosti in zastoji pri inovacijah;
Welcomes the Commission’s target of reducing the administrative burden on business; looks forward to receiving concrete indications of how this target is being achieved while ensuring conditions of good governance; stresses that all levels of government can contribute to achieving this target and should therefore be involved in related policy decisions; calls, in connection with reducing bureaucracy and simplifying European legislation, for clear monitoring with a view to determining to what extent the leeway offered by European legislative acts is actually exploited by the Member States to take account of national specificities and innovation bottlenecks when transposing them;
meni, da imajo države članice skupaj z zainteresiranimi stranmi na nacionalni, regionalni in lokalni ravni glavno vlogo pri doseganju lizbonskih ciljev; poudarja, da so največjo rast in največ delovnih mest ustvarile države, ki so odprte za zunanjo konkurenčnost, izvajajo reforme in si prizadevajo za proračunsko ravnovesje ter visokokakovostne javne in zasebne naložbe; obžaluje še vedno majhno prepoznavnost lizbonske strategije v nacionalnih politikah številnih članic EU; meni, da je za zagotovitev njenega učinkovitega izvajanja treba mobilizirati vse zainteresirane strani v gospodarstvu; še posebej meni, da se bodo z večjo udeležbo socialnih partnerjev, nacionalnih parlamentov, regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti ter civilne družbe izboljšali rezultati lizbonske strategije in okrepila javna razprava o ustreznih reformah; podpira predlog Komisije državam članicam, naj poglobijo sodelovanje z nacionalnimi in regionalnimi parlamenti, obenem pa predvidijo letne razprave o izvajanju njihovih nacionalnih programov reform;
Considers that Member States, together with stakeholders at national, regional and local level, are the main actors in delivering the Lisbon goals; points out that those countries which are open to external competition, implementing reforms and pursuing budgetary balance, as well as high-quality public and private investment, are the ones that have grown the most and have created the most employment; regrets the still weak visibility of the Lisbon Strategy in the national politics of many EU countries; takes the view that the mobilisation of all economic stakeholders is essential to ensuring its effective implementation; in particular, believes that a better involvement of social partners, national parliaments, regional and local authorities, and civil society will improve the results of the Lisbon Strategy and enhance the public debate on appropriate reforms; supports the Commission’s proposal to the Member States to deepen the collaboration with national and regional parliaments, while providing for annual debates on the implementation of their NRPs;
poudarja, kako pomembno je, da so regionalni in lokalni organi ter zainteresirane strani zavezani tako obsegu kot inovativnemu značaju dosežkov; v zvezi s tem pozdravlja močno zanimanje, ki ga Evropski ekonomsko-socialni odbor in Odbor regij kažeta pri spremljanju lizbonske strategije;
Stresses the importance of the commitment of regional and local authorities and stakeholders to both the range and the innovative character of achievements; welcomes in this context the strong interest of the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions in monitoring the Lisbon Strategy;
opozarja, da so integrirane smernice pomembno usklajevalno orodje in da predstavljajo skupen okvir, v katerem države članice izpolnjujejo načrtovane nacionalne reforme; meni, da analize in povratne informacije iz držav članic kažejo, da smernice delujejo, vendar bi bilo vseeno treba izboljšati prilagajanje novim gospodarskim in zaposlitvenim pogojem ter nadalje spremljanje oz. primerjalne analize držav članic; poziva k obsežnejši uporabi in izvajanju kazalcev in ciljev;
Recalls that the Integrated Guidelines provide an important instrument of coordination and a common framework for diverse Member States to pursue their own national reform agendas; considers that analysis and feedback from Member States show that the guidelines are working, but that improvement is nevertheless needed when it comes to adapting to new economic and employment conditions as well as following up (benchmarking) the Member States; calls for more comprehensive application and implementation of indicators and targets;
pozdravlja poročila o državah, ki jih je pripravila Evropska komisija; vendar poziva k bolj sistematičnemu pristopu, ki bi pokazal tako dosežke kot pomanjkljivosti; podpira predlog Komisije, da uvede posebne opazovalne točke kot del večstranskega spremljanja, s čimer bi bila dana tudi možnost za izboljšanje odziva nacionalnih politik;
Welcomes the country reports drawn up by the European Commission; calls, however, for a more systematic approach which highlights successes as well as shortcomings; supports the Commission’s proposal to introduce particular ‘points to watch’ as part of multilateral surveillance, also providing a chance to improve national policy responses;
meni, da pomanjkanje ustreznega spremljanja onemogoča osveščene politične izbire; v zvezi s tem poudarja, da bi lahko veliko bolje uporabili strokovno znanje in znanje, ki je na voljo v evropskih decentraliziranih agencijah na področjih, za katera so pristojne;
Regards the lack of proper monitoring as a major obstacle to well-informed policy choices; underlines in this respect that much better use could be made of the expertise and knowledge available within the European decentralised agencies in the fields of their competencies;
odobrava sklep z Evropskega sveta 2006, da ukrepa glede pomanjkanja podatkov, pridobljenih s spremljanjem, in naroči Odboru regij, naj pripravi študijo o strategiji za rast in delovna mesta, ki bo zajemala 104 regije in mesta Evropske unije, ki si izmenjujejo stališča o izvajanju lizbonske politike, njeni rezultati pa bodo predstavljeni na spomladanskem Evropskem svetu leta 2008; poudarja, da bo študija pokazala, ali je določba o namembnosti strukturnih skladov prispevala k temu, da je bilo v inovacije in okoljske cilje usmerjenih več sredstev iz strukturnih skladov; pričakuje, da bo v študiji tudi ocena dodane vrednosti regionalizacije lizbonske strategije;
Welcomes, therefore, the 2006 Council’s decision to remedy the lack of monitoring data and to have the Committee of the Regions draft its ‘Growth and Jobs Strategy’ monitoring exercise, which involved 104 regions and cities of the EU sharing their views on the implementation of the Lisbon policy – a study to be presented to the 2008 Spring Council; underlines that this study shows whether the Structural Funds’ earmarking provision helps channel a greater share of Structural Fund expenditure towards innovation and environmental goals; awaits the evaluation in this study of the added value of the regionalisation of the Lisbon Strategy;
meni, da način merjenja uspešnosti lizbonske strategije nikakor ni samoumeven, ali, bolj splošno povedano, ni samoumevno, kateri kazalci so primerni za merjenje „napredka“; je pa popolnoma prepričan, da spremljanje uspehov in neuspehov ne more biti omejeno na gospodarske kazalce, kot je BND, saj je BND v najboljšem primeru kazalec ustvarjenega bogastva v določenem obdobju, ne da pa zanesljivega podatka o ravni bogastva v neki družbi, še zdaleč pa ne pokaže, kolikšno ceno za ustvarjanje dodatnega bogastva plačujeta družba in okolje;
Believes that it is not at all self-evident how to measure the success of the Lisbon agenda or, more generally speaking, which indicators would be appropriate ways to measure ‘progress’; takes the definite view, however, that monitoring successes and failures cannot be restricted to economic indicators such as GNI alone, since GNI is – at best – an indicator of wealth creation over a given period, but does not even give reliable information about the level of wealth in a society, and is far from giving any hint of the social and environmental costs at which additional wealth creation comes;