natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
opozarja, da v nekaterih državah članicah ženske predstavljajo največjo skupino med izključenimi delavci in da je za mnoge med njimi odločitev, sprejeti plačano delo, odvisna od razpoložljivosti in privlačnosti zaposlitve; zato evropski spomladanski vrh poziva, naj znotraj lizbonskih ciljev ustrezno opredeli potrebo po enakih možnostih za oba spola, vključno z ukrepi za spodbujanje družini prijaznih modelov zaposlovanja in delovnega časa, varne zaposlitve in enake obravnave, za širši dostop do usposabljanja in odpravo razlik med spoloma na področju plač ter razširitev ponudbe za varstvo otrok in nego starejših družinskih članov;
Recalls that, in some Member States, the largest group of excluded workers is women, for many of whom the decision whether to take paid work depends on the availability and attractiveness of employment; therefore invites the European Spring Council to address the need for gender mainstreaming in the context of the Lisbon objectives, including measures to promote family-friendly patterns of employment and working time, secure employment and equal treatment, to improve access to training and to close the gender gap in pay and extend childcare and support for care of the elderly;
podpira idejo integrirane raziskovalne in industrijske politike in njene finančne dostopnosti s posebnim poudarkom na MSP; meni tudi, da potrebuje Evropa trdne industrijske temelje ter da je treba njeno konkurenčnost okrepiti z vzpostavitvijo obširnih tehnoloških pobud na podlagi zasebnih pobud in/ali javnih in zasebnih partnerstev;
Supports the idea of an integrated research and industrial policy with special focus on SMEs, and its financial accessibility; considers also that Europe needs a sound industrial base and that its competitiveness must be enhanced by setting up major technological initiatives on the basis of private initiatives and/or public-private partnerships;
poziva vse države članice, naj se na pomladanskem vrhu EU obvežejo, da bodo sprejele ukrepe, potrebne za povišanje deleža izdatkov za R&R na najmanj 3 % nacionalnega dohodka (2% za zasebni in 1% za javni sektor), obenem zagotavljajoč, da se preveri ustreznost vseh spodbujevalnih ukrepov glede na lizbonske cilje; poudarja, da je treba prav tako podvojiti evropska sredstva za R&R v skladu z lizbonskimi cilji, vključno z odobritvijo ustanovitve Evropskega raziskovalnega sveta kot neodvisnega svetovalnega telesa za področje raziskav;
Calls on all Member States to commit themselves at the Spring Summit to the measures needed in order to raise R&D spending to at least 3% of national income (2% for the private and 1% for the public sector), while assuring that any promoting measures are checked against the Lisbon goals; emphasises that this must be matched by doubling the European funding for R&D in line with the Lisbon goals, including the approval of the establishment of an European Research Council, as an independent advisory board on research matters;
poziva Svet in Komisijo, da povečata svoja prizadevanja, namenjena oblikovanju predloga za stroškovno učinkovit, donosen in učinkovit patent EU, ki bo nudil zakonsko gotovost, nove priložnosti za majhna in srednja podjetja ter ki bo resnično spodbudil raziskave in razvoj v Evropi;
Asks the Council and the Commission to increase their efforts to propose a cost-efficient, least burdensome and well functioning EU Patent that provides legal certainty, fosters opportunities for SMEs and gives a real boost to European research and development;
podpira Komisijo pri prizadevanjih, da skupaj s Parlamentom opredelita zanesljiv načrt z jasnimi zakonodajnimi in proračunskimi prednostmi na treh stebrih v okviru lizbonske strategije, vztraja pri obširnem posvetovanju s Parlamentom o vsebini načrta in o vzpostavitvi učinkovitega mehanizma med Komisijo in Parlamentom za skupno načrtovanje;
Supports the Commission in defining, together with Parliament, a reliable road-map with clear legislative and budgetary priorities on the three pillars within the Lisbon Strategy; insists on detailed consultation with Parliament on its content and on the creation of an effective Commission-Parliament mechanism for joint programming;
zahteva, da se Komisija bolj dosledno poslužuje analiz učinka na gospodarstvo, družbo, zdravje in okolje, z namenom sodelovanja z Evropskim parlamentom pri nadzoru in izboljševanju obstoječe zakonodaje, učinkovitega in prednostnega izvajanja medinstitucionalnega sporazuma o boljšem sprejemanju zakonov, vključno z ustreznimi mehanizmi za učinkovito posvetovanje z vsemi interesnimi skupinami; vseeno pa vztraja, da mora presoja vplivov vedno upoštevati stroške neaktivnosti ter dolgoročnejše stroške in koristi v monetarnem in kakovostnem smislu; poziva tudi k boljšemu naknadnemu ocenjevanju sprejetih in izvršenih ukrepov;
Requests the Commission to use economic, social, health and environmental impact assessments more coherently, to cooperate with the European Parliament in monitoring and improving existing legislation, and thereby implement effectively the interinstitutional agreement on Better Law-Making as a matter of priority, including appropriate mechanisms for effective consultation of all stakeholders; insists, however, that impact assessment must always take account of the costs of not taking action and of longer-terms costs and benefits in monetary and qualitative terms; calls also for better ex-post evaluation of adopted and implemented measures;
poziva Komisijo, da preveri, če so vsi osnutki zakonodajnih predlogov v skladu s cilji lizbonske strategije in tako zagotovi popolno ustreznost prihodnje zakonodaje s potrebnimi demokratičnimi postopki, tudi če se uporabijo instrumenti komitologije, da okrepi svoje načrte za poenostavitev obstoječega pravnega reda, s tem pa zmanjša stroške usklajevanja ter sprosti sredstva za spodbujanje inovativnosti ter odpiranje delovnih mest;
Requests the Commission to check all draft legislative proposals for their consistency with the Lisbon Strategy objectives, to guarantee that future legislation, even if comitology instruments are used, is fully in line with the necessary democratic procedures, to enhance its plans to simplify and streamline the existing "acquis", thus reducing compliance costs and releasing resources to stimulate innovation and create jobs;
podpira idejo nacionalnih akcijskih načrtov za izvajanje lizbonske strategije, ki predvidevajo, da vsaka vlada imenuje ministra, zadolženega za usklajevanje ukrepov;
Supports the idea of national action plans to implement the Lisbon strategy, with every government nominating a minister to coordinate action;
pozdravlja idejo o pripravi konsolidiranih poročil in poziva k uporabi manjšega števila kakovostnejših kazalcev, ki naj omogočijo preglednejše merjenje napredka gospodarskih, družbenih in okoljskih elementov lizbonske strategije ter vključujejo javno dostopno bazo podatkov s seznamom stopenj prenosa za vsako državo članico, kot tudi s kazalci ter najboljšo prakso za sofinancirane programe; poziva, da začne Evropska komisija Evropskemu parlamentu in nacionalnim parlamentom redno sporočati oceno, kako države članice izvajajo lizbonsko strategijo;
Welcomes a consolidated reporting and calls for fewer but better indicators to provide more transparent measurement of progress on the economic, social and environmental elements of the Lisbon strategy, including a publicly accessible database listing the transposition quota per Member State, as well as bench-marking and best practice for co-financed programmes; calls for a communication presented by the European Commission on a regular basis to the attention of both the European and national parliaments which evaluates the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy by Members States;
zahteva, da se letna poročila Komisije o napredku kakor tudi njene gospodarske strateške smernice pošljejo Evropskemu parlamentu, še preden se predložijo Svetu, da bi omogočili Parlamentu, da poda svoje mnenje;
Demands that the Commission's annual progress reports as well as its economic strategic guidelines be sent to the European Parliament prior to their transmission to the Council, to enable Parliament to give its opinion;
poziva pomladanski vrh EU, da oblikuje preprostejše in doslednejše sisteme upravljanja, z namenom poenostaviti javni in parlamentarni nadzor;
Calls on the Spring Summit to create simpler and more coherent governance systems, to create a single focus for public and parliamentary scrutiny;
predlaga organizacijo tristranskega srečanja med tremi institucijami, da bi opredelili pomembne politične prednostne naloge pred letnim pomladanskim Evropskim svetom;
Proposes a tripartite meeting between the three Institutions to identify key political priorities prior to the annual Spring Council;
poudarja, da je treba s Parlamentom razviti izvirno kulturo dialoga, da bi ustvarili čut skupne udeležbe; meni, da je komunikacija in budno izvajanje prav tako pomembno za Parlament; zato meni, da je močno partnerstvo med Parlamentom in Komisijo ter med Parlamentom in nacionalnimi parlamenti, skupaj s širšim sodelovanjem regionalnih in lokalnih oblasti, bistvenega pomena za uspeh;
Insists that a real culture of dialogue should be developed with the Parliament in order to build a sense of shared ownership, communication and vigilant implementation being equally of major concern to Parliament; therefore, believes that a strong partnership between the Parliament and the Commission, and the Parliament and the national parliaments, together with increased involvement of regional and local authorities, is key to achieving success;
opozarja na medparlamentarno konferenco, ki se bo odvijala v Bruslju 16. in 17. marca 2005 z namenom spodbujati sodelovanje v tem smislu med nacionalnimi parlamenti in Evropskim parlamentom; poziva pomladanski vrh EU, da predstavi predloge, usmerjene v okrepitev parlamentarne dimenzije in vloge civilnega dialoga v lizbonski strategiji;
Calls attention to the interparliamentary conference to be held in Brussels on 16-17 March 2005 to promote cooperation to this end between national parliaments and the European Parliament; calls on the Spring Summit to make proposals to strengthen both the parliamentary dimension and the role of public debate in the Lisbon Strategy;
zahteva, da nacionalni in evropski proračuni ter tudi bodoča finančna perspektiva 2007-2013 odražajo cilje, zastavljene v okviru lizbonskega procesa;
Requests that the National and European budgets, including the future Financial Perspectives 2007-2013, should be an expression of the goals pursued in the framework of the Lisbon process;
ugotavlja enkratno dodano vrednost regionalne politike pri doseganju lizbonskih ciljev ter ponovno opozarja, da so za učinkovit in uravnotežen odgovor na ta izziv potrebna ustrezna finančna sredstva; opozarja, da so preoblikovani strukturni skladi sedaj osredotočeni na lizbonske cilje ter vztraja, da mora to vlogo odražati tudi finančna perspektiva;
Recognises a unique added value of the Regional Policy in the implementation of the Lisbon objectives and recalls that adequate financial means are necessary to respond efficiently and in a balanced way to this challenge; calls attention to the fact that the redesigned structural funds are now focused strongly on the Lisbon objectives and insists that the Financial Perspectives must reflect this role;
priznava pomen projektov TEN ter njihove pospešene gradnje pri doseganju lizbonskih ciljev in zato podpira Komisijo pri njenih prizadevanjih prepričati države članice, da morajo biti ti projekti načrtovani in financirani s podporo proračuna EU in preko javnih in zasebnih partnerstev;
Recognises the importance of the TENs projects and their rapid construction in reinforcing the achievement of the Lisbon goals, therefore supports the Commission in its endeavours to persuade the Member States that these projects must be planned and financed with the support of the EU budget and via public-private partnerships;
meni, da je potrebno uvesti novo pobudo za informacijsko družbo, ki bo obravnavala izzive vse do leta 2010, da bi morala ta pobuda vzpostaviti stabilno okolje za razvoj elektronskih komunikacij in digitalnih storitev ter se osredotočiti na razvoj raziskav, inovativnosti ter uporabe IKT v EU;
Believes that it is necessary to launch a new information society initiative addressing the challenges up to 2010 and that this initiative should set a stable environment for the development of electronic communications and digital services and focus on developing EU efforts in research, innovation and deployment of ICT;
poziva pomladanski vrh EU, da ugotovi, da so naložbe bistvene za posodobitev Evrope in da sprejme skupne ukrepe za spodbuditev javnih ter zasebnih naložb, s posebnim poudarkom na naložbah, ki so najbolj nujne za lizbonski proces,
Asks the Spring Summit to recognise that investment will be a crucial agent of Europe's modernisation and to agree on common action to boost public and private investment, with special emphasis on those forms of investment most crucial to Lisbon;
poziva pomladanski vrh EU, da okrepi vlogo Evropske investicijske banke s poudarkom na boljši osredotočenosti posojil na naložbe, ki podpirajo lizbonski proces, ter povečanju posojil v zvezi s tveganim kapitalom in boljši podpori MSP, še posebej tistih, ki jih kapitalski trg zanemarja;
Calls on the Summit to reinforce the role of the European Investment Bank, with an emphasis on better focusing lending activities to Lisbon-supporting investments and expanding respective risk-capital lending and its support for SMEs, in particular those neglected by the capital market;
z zahtevo za vključitev razprave o primerih kršitev človekovih pravic, demokracije in načela pravne države v dnevni red
with request for inclusion in the agenda for the debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
v skladu s členom 115 Poslovnika,
pursuant to Rule 115 of the Rules of Procedure
ki ga vlagata Jonas Sjöstedt in Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto
by Jonas Sjöstedt and Vittorio Emanuele Agnoletto
o položaju človekovih pravic v Belorusiji
on the human rights situation in Belarus
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o položaju človekovih pravic v Belorusiji
European Parliament resolution on the human rights situation in Belarus
ob upoštevanju svojih predhodnih resolucij o razmerah v Belorusiji,
having regard to its previous resolutions on the situation in Belarus,
ob upoštevanju člena 115 svojega Poslovnika,
having regard to Rule 115 of its Rules of Procedure,
ker je EU že večkrat obsodila aretacije vodilnih članov opozicije s strani Lukašenkove vlade in ker ni nikakršnega napredka v nerešenih primerih številnih izginulih oseb,
whereas the EU has repeatedly condemned the arrest of prominent opposition leaders by the Lukashenko government, and whereas no progress has been made in the unsolved cases of a number of disappeared persons,
ker, čeprav je bila decembra 2004 zmanjšana nepravična kazen, na katero je bil obsojen Mihail Marinič, bivši minister za zunanje gospodarske odnose, je le-ta še vedno na seznamu Amnesty International kot "zapornik vesti" in še vedno prestaja triinpolletno zaporno kazen kljub pozivom k takojšnji in brezpogojni izpustitvi iz njegovega sedanjega zapora v Minsku,
whereas, although the unjust sentence imposed on the former Minister of Foreign Economic Relations, Mikhail Marynich, in December 2004 was reduced, he is still listed as a 'prisoner of conscience' by Amnesty International and is still serving a three-and-a-half-year sentence, despite calls for his immediate and unconditional release from his current imprisonment in Minsk,
ker je v zadnjih nekaj letih prišlo do ukinitve več kot 50 pro-demokratičnih NVO na različnih ravneh in različnih političnih usmeritev ter 25 neodvisnih množičnih medijev in ker je bilo zaprtih več izobraževalnih ustanov,
whereas over the past few years several political parties and more than 50 pro-democracy NGOs at different levels and of different political orientations, 25 independent mass media entities and several educational establishments have been closed,
ker so aretacije in sodni procesi iz političnih razlogov aktivistov demokratičnega gibanja in neodvisnih novinarjev v Belorusiji redna praksa in ker sta bila septembra 2004 dva člana beloruske opozicije, Valerij Levonevski in Aleksander Vasiljev, obsojena na dve leti zapora zaradi obrekovanja beloruskega predsednika,
whereas politically motivated arrests and trials of activists in the pro-democracy movement and independent journalists are continually taking place in Belarus, and whereas in September 2004 two members of the Belarus opposition, Valery Levonevsky and Alexander Vasilyev, were sentenced to two years’ imprisonment on a charge of defaming the President of Belarus,
obsoja napade beloruske vlade na medije, novinarje, pripadnike opozicije, borce za človekove pravice in vse ljudi, ki skušajo svobodno izraziti kritiko na račun predsednika in režima;
Condemns the Belarus Government's attacks on the media, journalists, members of the opposition, human rights activists and any person who attempts freely to voice criticism of the President and the regime;
obsoja samovoljne aretacije, slabo ravnanje z zaporniki, izginotja, preganjanje iz političnih razlogov in druga dejanja represije v Belorusiji;
Condemns the arbitrary arrests, ill‑treatment of detainees, disappearances, politically motivated persecution and other acts of repression in Belarus;
poziva beloruske oblasti, naj nemudoma in brezpogojno izpustijo Valerija Levonevskega, Aleksandra Vasiljeva in Mihaila Mariniča ter vse druge zaprte politične nasprotnike režima;
Calls on the Belarus authorities for the immediate and unconditional release of Mikhail Marynich, Valery Levonevsky, Alexander Vasilyev and all other imprisoned political opponents;
poziva k odprtju neodvisne preiskave, ki bi jo vodil nepristranski preiskovalec, o primerih v zvezi z izginotjem Jurija Zakarenka, bivšega ministra za notranje zadeve, Viktorja Gončarja, bivšega podpredsednika beloruskega parlamenta, Anatolija Krasovskega, poslovneža in Dimitrija Zavadskega, snemalca ruske televizijske postaje ORT;
Calls for an independent investigation to be opened, under a neutral investigator, of the cases involving the disappearance of Yuri Zakharenko, the former Minister of the Interior; Victor Gonchar, the former Vice-President of the Parliament of Belarus; Anatoly Krasovsky, a businessman; and Dmitry Zavadski, a cameraman for the Russian TV channel ORT;
ponovno poudarja, da je potrebno v Belorusiji storiti napredek v smeri demokratizacije in reform v državi;
Emphasises once again that progress must be made towards democratisation and reform in Belarus;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj to resolucijo posreduje Svetu, Komisiji, vladam in parlamentom držav članic, vladi ter parlamentu Belorusije in parlamentarnim skupščinam OVSE ter Svetu Evrope.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Government and Parliament of Belarus and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe.
o prihodnosti evropskih šol
on the future of the European Schools
Predlog resolucije Evropskega parlamenta o prihodnosti evropskih šol
Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the future of the European Schools
ob upoštevanju sporočila Komisije "Posvetovanje o možnostih razvijanja sistema evropskih šol" ( KOM(2004) 519 končno),
having regard to the Commission Communication ‘Consultation on options for developing the European Schools system’ ( COM(2004) 519 final),
ob upoštevanju odločitve o zaprtju več jezikovnih oddelkov v štirih evropskih šolah (Bergen, Culham, Mol in Karlsruhe),
having regard to the decision to close down a number of language sections in four European Schools (Bergen, Culham, Mol and Karlsruhe),
ker imajo evropske šole še naprej pomemben izobraževalni in kulturni cilj osveščanja novih generacij o evropskem državljanstvu,
whereas the European Schools continue to serve an important educational and cultural purpose, with a view to creating awareness of European citizenship in the new generations,
ob upoštevanju negativnega učinka nesorazmernega povečanja vpisnine za učence tretje kategorije,
having regard to the negative impact of the disproportionate increase in the tuition fee for Category 3 pupils,
v upanju, da se bodo države članice lotile ohranjanja oziroma ustvarjanja novih jezikovnih oddelkov,
hoping to see the Member States involved in safeguarding or creating new language sections,
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pretehtata, ali naj se države članice v prihodnosti ukvarjajo z razvijanjem evropskih šol z namenom, da zagotovijo delovanje obstoječih jezikovnih oddelkov, obenem pa omogočijo njihovo dostopnost učencem, ki naj bi sodili v tretjo kategorijo, saj meni, da bi spreminjanje šol v evropsko javno službo, dostopno vsem državljanom držav članic, pri novih generacijah pomagalo izoblikovati zavest o evropskem državljanstvu;
Calls on the Commission and the Council to consider whether the Member States should be involved in the future prospect of developing the European Schools, in order to both ensure the operation of the existing language sections and allow them to be opened up to pupils considered as belonging to Category 3, since it is convinced that turning the Schools into a European public service, potentially open to all Member State citizens, would help to create awareness of European citizenship in the new generations;
poziva Komisijo in Svet, naj pripravita predloge za pogajanja s 25 vladami držav članic.
Calls on the Commission and the Council to put forward proposals to be negotiated with the 25 governments of the Member States.
k vprašanju za ustni odgovor B6‑xxxx
further to Question for Oral Answer O-0036/05
ki ga vlaga Nikolaos Sifunakis
by Nikolaos Sifunakis
v imenu Odbora za kulturo in izobraževanje
on behalf of the Committee on Culture and Education
o boju proti uporabi nedovoljenih poživil v športu
on combating doping in sport
ob upoštevanju Deklaracije o športu št. 29 iz priloge Amsterdamske pogodbe in člena III-282 Pogodbe o Ustavi za Evropo,
having regard to Declaration No 29 on sport, appended to the Amsterdam Treaty, and Article III-282 of the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe,
ob upoštevanju resolucije Parlamenta o sporočilu Komisije o načrtu podpore Skupnosti za boj proti uporabi nedovoljenih poživil v športu z dne 7. septembra 2000 ( KOM (1999) 643 - C5-0087/2000 -2000/2056(COS)),
having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2000 on the Commission communication on a Community support plan to combat doping in sport ( COM(1999) 643 - C5‑087/2000 - 2000/2056(COS)),
ob upoštevanju sklepov srečanja Sveta in predstavnikov vlad držav članic o boju proti uporabi nedovoljenih poživil, ki je potekalo 4. decembra 2004,
having regard to the conclusions of the Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, of 4 December 2000 on combating doping,
ob upoštevanju resolucije o poročilu Komisije Evropskemu svetu o ohranitvi sedanjih športnih struktur in varstvu družbene vloge športa v okviru Skupnosti z dne 7. septembra 2000 - Helsinško poročilo o športu ( KOM (1999) 644 - 2000/2055(COS)),
having regard to its resolution of 7 September 2000 on the Commission report to the European Council with a view to safeguarding current sports structures and maintaining the social function of sport within the Community framework - the Helsinki report on sport ( COM(1999) 644 - 2000/2055(COS)),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za kulturo, mladino, izobraževanje, medije in šport ter mnenja Odbora za okolje, javno zdravje in varstvo potrošnikov ( A5-0203/2000 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy ( A5-0203/2000 ),
ob upoštevanju Svetovnega kodeksa proti dopingu, sprejetega 5. marca 2004 v Kopenhagnu,
having regard to the World Anti-Doping Code, adopted on 5 March 2003 in Copenhagen,