natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
ker bi v skladu z zaključki predsedstva Evropskega sveta v Luksemburgu 22. in 23. marca 2005 državna pomoč morala imeti vlogo vzvoda pri razvoju raziskovanja, izobraževanja in inovacij in bi morala omogočati pristen dialog med zainteresiranimi skupinami javnega in zasebnega sektorja,
whereas, in line with the Presidency conclusions of the Luxembourg European Council of 22 and 23 March 2005, State aid should act as a lever for developing research, education and innovation, and should permit a genuine dialogue to take place between interested parties in the public and private sectors,
ker je zelo pomembno, da se jasno opredeli pojem R&R, da se prepreči zlorabe državnih pomoči na ta račun,
whereas it is very important to define clearly what is meant by R&D in order to prevent the abuse of the State aid rules,
ponovno opozarja, da bi državna pomoč morala biti izjema: sredstvo za popravo neravnovesij, ki se jih ni možno lotiti z običajnimi političnimi instrumenti; poudarja pomen zagotavljanja skladnosti med temi ukrepi in tistimi, katerih namen je zmanjšanje nepotrebne regulacije in uvedba nadaljnjih deregulativnih ukrepov, naložbe v izobraževanje in usposabljanje, zagotavljanje ustrezne infrastrukture, zagotovitev patentnega režima, ki je naklonjen inovacijam, zagotovitev poštene konkurence, olajšanje dostopa do rizičnega kapitala, spodbujanje podjetniškega duha, odstranjevanje ovir za svobodo gibanja delavcev in raziskovalcev v EU ter sprejetje skupne politike zakonitega priseljevanja, ki EU omogoča pritegniti najboljše in najpametnejše;
Recalls that State aid should remain the exception: an instrument to correct imbalances that cannot be addressed by regular policy instruments; underlines the importance of guaranteeing coherence between such measures and those aimed at reducing unnecessary regulation and introducing further deregulation measures, investing in education and training, providing adequate infrastructure, ensuring that the patent regime is conducive to innovation, ensuring fair competition, facilitating access to risk capital, encouraging an entrepreneurial spirit, removing obstacles to the freedom of movement for workers and researchers within the EU, and adopting a common policy for legal immigration, which enables the EU to attract the best and the brightest;
poudarja, da so potrebna dodatna pojasnila glede uporabe določb o državni pomoči pri mednarodnih čezmejnih gospodarskih dejavnostih podjetij ter raziskovalnih in akademskih ustanov;
Stresses that further clarification is needed of how the State aid rules will apply to international cross-border economic activities of companies, research establishments, and academic institutions;
meni, da bi državna pomoč za inovacije morala biti dopolnilo k ustrezni enotni politiki Skupnosti in bi morala imeti tako jasno in preverljivo dodano vrednost za neposredne koristnike, kakor tudi sekundarni učinek na širšo lokalno, regionalno in nacionalno gospodarstvo;
Considers that State aid for innovation should be complementary to the corresponding uniform Community policies and should import clear, measurable added value for the immediate beneficiaries as well as a secondary impact on the broader local, regional and national economy;
poudarja, da je treba iz preteklih primerov, v katerih državna pomoč ni dosegla svojega cilja, kakor tudi iz tistih, v katerih se je izkazala za učinkovito sredstvo za doseganje želenih rezultatov, potegniti ustrezne zaključke,
Stresses the need to draw conclusions from past cases in which State aid failed to achieve its aims, as well as from those cases in which it proved to be an effective instrument for attaining the desired objectives;
pozdravlja odprto posvetovanje Komisije in spodbuja nadaljevanje dialoga, katerega namen je razjasnitev vseh točk pred dokončnim oblikovanjem novega okvira, ki ga je treba čim prej začeti izvajati; meni, da se je zaradi večrazsežnosti in zapletenosti ciljev na področju inovacij treba izogniti zelo omejevalnim opredelitvam in ureditvam; priporoča, da se predvidi začasni datum za revizijo okvira v primeru, da bodo potrebne izboljšave; ugotavlja tudi, da je treba razmisliti o reviziji priročnika iz Osla, ki določa metodološki okvir za merjenje inovativnosti;
Welcomes the Commission's open consultation and encourages the continuation of dialogue in order to clarify all points before finalisation of the new framework, which should be implemented as soon as possible; considers, that the objective of innovation is multidimensional and complex and that very restrictive definitions and arrangements should be avoided; recommends an interim deadline for revising the framework in the event of the need for improvement; notes, moreover, that the revision of the Oslo Manual, which lays down the methodological framework for measuring innovation, should be taken into account;
poziva Komisijo, naj priskrbi podrobnejše podatke o možnih učinkih izkrivljanja, ko jih povzročijo državne pomoči, ter naj upošteva državne pomoči, ki jih dodeljujejo mednarodni konkurenti EU, tako na sektorski kot na vodoravni ravni in njihove možne učinke izkrivljanja in spodbude na svetovni ravni; poudarja, da so učinkovito vodenje inovacijske politike, primerjalna merila na mednarodni ravni, nadnacionalno učenje politike, nadzor ter izvajanje presoje vplivov najustreznejši odgovori na izzive svetovne konkurenčnosti;
Asks the Commission to provide more detailed information about the possible distortional effects of State aid and to take into account State aid granted by the EU's international competitors, both at sectoral and horizontal level and its possible distortional and incentive effects on a global scale; points out that the effective governance of innovation policy, international benchmarking, trans-national policy learning, monitoring, and conducting impact assessments are the most appropriate responses to the challenges of global competition;
vztraja, da bi morali biti spodbujanje čezmejnega sodelovanja in partnerstva med javnim in zasebnim sektorjem na področju raziskovanja, razširitve rezultatov raziskovanja ter večjih raziskovalnih programov glavne prednostne naloge državne pomoči na področju R&R;
Insists that the promotion of cross-border cooperation and public-private partnerships in research, the dissemination of the results of the research, and major research programmes, should be fundamental priorities of State aid for R&D;
ocenjuje, da je izraz "neučinkovitost na trgu" bolj primeren kot "neuspeh na trgu" ter zahteva podrobnejšo in bolj uporabno opredelitev; predlaga, naj bo prepoznavanje ovir, ki omejujejo inovacije, kakor tudi količinska opredelitev njihove dejanske vrednosti, predmet dodatnega pregleda;
Considers the term 'market inefficiency' more appropriate than 'market failure', and asks for a more detailed and operational definition; suggests that the identification of obstacles limiting innovation, as well as the quantification of its effective value, should be subject to further scrutiny;
poudarja potrebo po zanesljivih statističnih podatkih o trgu in neučinkovitosti državne pomoči na področju inovacij ter o učinkovitosti državne pomoči za inovacije;
Stresses the need for reliable statistical data both on market and on State aid inefficiencies in the field of innovation, as well as on the effectiveness of State aid for innovation;
priznava, da neučinkovitosti na trgu najbolj vplivajo na mala in srednja podjetja ter novoustanovljena podjetja; hkrati opaža, da je vpliv državne pomoči manj izkrivljajoč, ko je dodeljena v korist dejavnosti, oddaljenih od trga, ali malih in srednjih podjetij ter novoustanovljenih podjetij;
Recognises that SMEs and start-ups are most affected by market inefficiencies; notes, at the same time, that the effect of State aid is less distorting when granted in favour of activities at a distance from the market or to SMEs and start-ups;
poudarja, da je treba za mala in srednja podjetja ustvariti inovacijam prijazno okolje, da se spodbuja njihove neizkoriščene inovacijske možnosti;
Stresses the need to create an innovation-friendly environment for SMEs in order to stimulate their untapped innovation potential;
poudarja, da je treba malim in srednje velikim podjetjem, ki po svoji naravi razpolagajo z omejenimi finančnimi sredstvi, glede na njihov sedanji pomen dodeliti večji delež pomoči; za to pa je treba posrednikom za inovacije nameniti pomembnejšo vlogo, takoj ko bosta njihova narava in vloga bolje pojasnjeni in takoj ko bo infrastruktura, ki jo morajo zagotoviti, vključevala tudi infrastrukturo informacijske tehnologije, povezovanje in povezave z mednarodnimi podatkovnimi bazami;
Stresses that the importance in this connection of SMEs, which, by their nature, have only limited funds at their disposal, makes it necessary for them to be allocated a higher proportion of the aid available; to make this possible, a greater role needs to be played by innovation intermediaries once their nature and role has been clarified further and the necessary infrastructure which they should provide has been extended to include IT infrastructure, and networking and link-up to international databases;
opozarja, da se MSP pogosto ne odločijo za velika tveganja, povezana s tehnološkimi inovacijami, ki lahko prinašajo koristi ne le posameznim podjetjem, ampak tudi celotni družbi; meni, da je nujno potrebno usmeriti državno pomoč v podporne ukrepe, ki motivirajo MSP in zmanjšujejo tveganja, povezana z inovacijskimi tehnološkimi procesi, ter da je treba izboljšati splošne razmere v poslovnem okolju;
Points out that SMEs are often not willing to take the high risks associated with technological innovation, even though this could not only bring individual benefits, but could also potentially benefit society as a whole; stresses the need urgently to target State aid at supportive actions that motivate SMEs and diminish the risks linked with technological innovation processes, as well as the need to improve the overall conditions of the business environment;
se zaveda, da je državna pomoč lahko nujna za sprožitev inovativnih projektov ali znanstvenih ali tehnoloških raziskovalnih projektov, ki so oddaljeni od trga;
Is aware that State aid may be necessary in order to set in motion innovative projects or scientific or technological research projects which are distant from the marketplace;
opozarja, da je spodbudni vpliv različnih instrumentov državne pomoči težko dokazati, vendar ga je možno olajšati s standardiziranim nizom vprašanj; meni, da je treba nepovratna sredstva čim manj uporabiti;
Notes that the incentive effect of different State aid instruments is difficult to demonstrate but may be facilitated by a standardised set of questions; considers that as little use as possible should be made of direct grants;
dvomi o razliki med tehnološkimi in netehnološkimi inovacijami; opaža pomen netehnoloških inovacij, predvsem pridobitev konkurenčnih prednosti s strani majhnih in srednjih podjetij; namesto tega podpira opredelitev inovacij, ki razlikuje med običajnimi vsakodnevnimi dejavnostmi podjetij in njihovimi dejavnostmi v zvezi z inovacijami; predlaga, da morajo biti do državne pomoči upravičeni tisti projekti, ki nudijo dodatne ali nove koristi za stranke, povzročajo tveganja, so namerni, imajo prenosljive koristi in ustvarjajo pozitivne zunanje učinke;
Questions the distinction between technological and non-technological innovation; notes the importance of non-technological innovation, particularly in the acquisition of competitive advantages by SMEs; favours, instead, a definition of innovation distinguishing between the regular day-to-day operations of companies and their activities relating to innovation; proposes that projects eligible for State aid should be those that provide additional or new client benefits, entail risk, are intentional, have transferable benefits, and create positive externalities;
meni, da se regionalna in državna pomoč za inovacije dopolnjujeta in da bi se morali osredotočiti na manj razvite regije, da bi v njih spodbujali gospodarsko in družbeno kohezijo; meni, da bo sicer takšna pomoč spodbudila le rast bolj razvitih regij in držav; meni, da regionalni programi pomoči, če so dodani državni pomoči za inovacije, morajo biti združljivi s predpisi o notranjem trgu in konkurenci; nadalje meni, da je treba pripisati poseben pomen opredelitvi državne pomoči za inovacije in dostopa do nje v zvezi z regionalnimi majhnimi in srednjimi podjetji, za katera je bistveno, da imajo dostop do inovacij;
Considers that regional aid and State aid for innovation are complementary and should focus on less-developed regions in order to promote economic and social cohesion; considers that otherwise such aid will only promote the growth of more developed regions and countries; considers that regional aid schemes, whenever additional to State aid for innovation, must be compatible with the internal market and the competition rules; considers, moreover, that particular importance should be attached to the definition of and eligibility for State aid for innovation in relation to regional SMEs for which it is vitally important to have access to innovation;
poziva Komisijo, da programe regionalne pomoči bolj usmeri v prihodnost ter predvsem dovoli podporo nematerialnim vlaganjem;
Calls on the Commission to make the regional aid schemes more forward-looking, allowing, in particular, support for intangible investments;
poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi, da se strukturno financiranje EU ne obravnava kot nezakonito državno pomoč, kadar je združeno s sofinanciranjem iz drugih virov; prosi tudi, da se ustrezni postopki spremenijo, s čimer bi se izognili dvojnemu obveščanju Komisije o takem financiranju;
Calls on the Commission to ensure that EU structural funding will not be regarded as unlawful State aid when combined with co-funding from other sources; further asks that the relevant procedures be modified so that dual notification to the Commission of such funding is avoided;
predlaga zahtevo po obdobju obstoja, ki ga je treba podaljšati do 8 let za podjetja z daljšim ciklom R&R;
Proposes that the existence period requirement for companies with a longer R&D cycle be extended to eight years;
podpira predlog, da se finančna pomoč dodeli s sredstvi rizičnega kapitala ne le za najzgodnejšo fazo in začetno fazo, ampak tudi za fazo po zagonu; vendar poudarja, da ta rešitev ni najboljša in da bi vsaka pomoč morala biti kratkotrajna in bi predvsem morala dopolnjevati zasebne naložbe;
Supports the proposal that financial support is given by means of risk capital not only for the seed and start-up phase, but also for the post-seed phase; stresses, however, that this solution is not optimal and that any aid should be of a short-term character and complementary to primarily private investments;
poudarja, da bi bilo treba pazljivo nadzorovati omejitev stroškov za R&R;
Emphasises that the limits on R&D costs should be carefully monitored;
ugotavlja, da je v tistih regijah in državah, kjer je okolje za inovacije posebno neugodno, lahko zaznavanje višjega tveganja zasebnih vlagateljev in finančnih ustanov pomemben zaviralec inovacij;
Notes that in regions and countries in which the innovation environment is particularly disadvantaged, a perception by private investors and financial institutions of higher risk may work as a major innovation-inhibiting factor;
se zaveda, da je dostop do rizičnega kapitala za inovativna MSP trenutno precej omejen, zlasti v začetnih fazah njihovega razvoja; zato podpira zamisel o uporabi državne pomoči za privabljanje zasebnih naložb v regionalne sklade rizičnega kapitala, ki delujejo kot javno-zasebna partnerstva z večjo prožnostjo investicijskih tranš za javne vire;
Realises that innovative SMEs' access to risk capital is currently considerably limited, primarily in the first phases of their development; supports, therefore, the idea of using State aid to attract private capital investment to regional risk-capital funds working as public-private partnerships with higher flexibility of investment tranches for public resources;
poziva k nadaljnji pojasnitvi pravnega položaja posrednikov glede na področje uporabe storitev, ki jih zagotavljajo; podpira sistem bonov, vendar predlaga uvedbo elementa sofinanciranja za pridobitev zasebnejših naložb; vseeno meni, da bi 100-odstotno povračilo stroškov lahko povzročilo izkrivljanje konkurence;
Calls for the further clarification of the legal status of intermediaries in regard to the scope of the services that they provide; supports the voucher system but proposes introducing an element of co-financing, in order to attract more private investment; believes, however, that the reimbursement of 100% might lead to the distortion of competition;
priporoča, da univerze in njihovi raziskovalni centri sodelujejo pri regionalnih javno-zasebnih partnerstvih kot "posredniki za inovacije" ali da z njimi tesno sodelujejo; meni, da bi to ustvarilo velik sinergijski učinek z boljšo medsebojno povezavo med raziskovalnimi in inovativnimi dejavnostmi univerz in potrebami posameznih inovativnih MSP ter inovativnih podjetniških skupin;
Recommends that universities and their research centres should take part in or cooperate closely with regional public-private partnerships as 'innovation intermediaries'; considers that this would create a large synergy effect with better interconnection between the research and innovation activities of universities and the needs of individual innovative SMEs and innovative business clusters;
zahteva nadaljnjo pojasnitev o tem, kako se pravila državne pomoči uporabljajo za univerze in raziskovalne ustanove, kadar se ukvarjajo z gospodarskimi dejavnostmi;
Asks for further clarification on how the State aid rules apply to universities and research establishments when they are engaged in economic activities;
dvomi o primernosti tega, da se državna pomoč dovoli malim in srednjim podjetjem za najemanje visoko usposobljenega osebja, ker imajo mala in srednja podjetja lahko dostop do strokovnega znanja in spretnosti prek storitev posrednikov in strokovnjakov;
Questions the appropriateness of allowing State aid to SMEs for hiring highly qualified staff, since SMEs may have access to specialist knowledge and skills through the services of intermediaries and experts;
meni, da imajo skupine organski izvor in morajo zato biti le kratkoročno upravičene do državne pomoči, med začetno fazo, da premagajo upravne težave in ovire, povezane s sodelovanjem;
Believes that clusters develop organically and should therefore be eligible for State aid only on a temporary basis, during the start-up phase, in order to meet administrative problems and obstacles linked with cooperation;
meni, da mora državna pomoč za infrastrukturo izpolnjevati zahteve tehnološke nevtralnosti in odprtega dostopa, obravnavati ugotovljen neuspeh na trgu in okrepiti inovativni potencial;
Believes that State aid for infrastructure should fulfil the requirement of technical neutrality and open access, address identified market failures, and enhance innovative potential;
naroči svojemu predsedniku, naj posreduje to resolucijo Svetu in Komisiji.
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.
Resolucija Evropskega parlamenta o varnosti v cestnem prometu: sistem "eCall" za vse ( 2005/2211(INI) )
European Parliament resolution on Road safety: bringing eCall to citizens ( 2005/2211(INI) )
ob upoštevanju bele knjige Komisije "Evropska prometna politika za leto 2010: čas odločitve" ( KOM(2001)0370 ) in svoje resolucije z dne 12. februarja 2003 UL C 43 E, 19.2.2004, str.
having regard to the Commission White Paper 'European transport policy for 2010: time to decide' ( COM(2001)0370 ), and its resolution of 12 February 2003 thereon OJ C 43 E, 19.2.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "Informacijska in komunikacijska tehnologija za varna in inteligentna vozila" ( KOM(2003)0542 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication 'Information and Communications Technologies for Safe and Intelligent Vehicles' ( COM(2003)0542 ),
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "Evropski akcijski program za varnost v cestnem prometu - Prepolovitev števila žrtev prometnih nesreč v Evropski uniji do leta 2010: soodgovornost" ( KOM(2003)0311 ) in njene publikacije "Rešimo 20 000 življenj na cestah" iz oktobra 2004,
having regard to the Commission Communication 'European Road Safety Action Programme – Halving the number of road accident victims in the European Union by 2010: A shared responsibility' ( COM(2003)0311 ) and its publication 'Saving 20 000 lives on our roads' of October 2004,
ob upoštevanju Priporočila Komisije 2004/345/ES z dne 6. aprila 2004 o krepitvi varnosti v cestnem prometu UL L 111, 17.4.2004, str.
having regard to Commission Recommendation 2004/345/EC of 6 April 2004 on enforcement in the field of road safety OJ L 111, 17.4.2004, p.
ob upoštevanju veronske izjave o varnosti v cestnem prometu z dne 5. decembra 2003, zaključkov drugega veronskega srečanja ministrov za promet EU leta 2004 in za tem podanih obvez teh ministrov glede varnosti v cestnem prometu kot prednostne naloge,
having regard to the Verona Declaration on Road Safety of 5 December 2003 as well as the conclusions of the Second Verona meeting of EU transport ministers of 2004 and the subsequent commitment given by those ministers to regard road safety as a priority,
ob upoštevanju Sporočila Komisije "i2010 - Evropska informacijska družba za rast in zaposlovanje" ( KOM(2005)0229 ),
having regard to the Commission Communication 'i2010 – A European Information Society for growth and employment' ( COM(2005)0229 ),
ob upoštevanju Drugega sporočila Komisije o varnosti vozil (eSafety) "Zagotovitev sistema za klic v sili (eCall) državljanom" ( KOM(2005)0431 ),
having regard to the Commission's 2nd eSafety Communication 'Bringing eCall to citizens' ( COM(2005)0431 ),
ob upoštevanju poročila Odbora za promet in turizem ( A6–0072/2006 ),
having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism ( A6-0072/2006 ),
ker je leta 2004 v EU 25-ih držav članic v prometnih nesrečah umrlo 43 000 ljudi ter ker bi s storitvijo vseevropskega avtomobilskega klica v sili (eCall) rešili do 2 500 življenj letno in tako za 15 % zmanjšal resnost poškodb,
whereas, in 2004, 43 000 people died in road accidents in the EU-25 Member States and a pan-European in-vehicle emergency call service/function, eCall, could save up to 2 500 lives a year and bring about a reduction of up to 15% in the gravity of injuries,
ker bi uvedba eCall sistema za klic v sili zmanjšala letne zunanje stroške cestnega prometa za okrog 26 milijard EUR in tako državljanom prihranila breme v višini 26 milijard EUR; ker bi si bilo treba namesto za internalizacijo prizadevati za zmanjšanje zunanjih stroškov,
whereas the introduction of the eCall system would reduce the annual external costs of road traffic by up to EUR 26 billion, thus relieving citizens of a burden of up to EUR 26 billion; whereas efforts should be made to reduce, not internalise, external costs,
ker sistem eCall prinaša možnost skrajšanja časa ukrepanja ob nesrečah za približno 40 % v mestnih območjih in za približno 50 % na podeželskih območjih,
whereas the eCall system has the potential to reduce the response time to accidents by approximately 40% in urban areas and approximately 50% in rural areas,
ker je potrebno pozdraviti storitev eCall kot prvi korak v okviru pobude "inteligentni avtomobil", kot je opredeljena v Sporočilu Komisije KOM(2005)0229 ,
whereas the eCall system is to be welcomed as the first building block of the intelligent car initiative as set out in Commission Communication COM(2005)0229 ,
ker je obsežna uvedba sistema eCall do leta 2009 prednostni cilj pobude eSafety,
whereas the large-scale roll-out of eCall by 2009 is a priority of the eSafety initiative,
ker je bil dosežen velik napredek na področju tehnologije, sistemov in storitev eSafety in ker razvoj programa Galileo prav tako ponuja možnosti za prihodnost,
whereas considerable progress has been made in the field of eSafety technologies, systems and services, and the development of Galileo also offers potential for the future,