natgillin/translations-raw huggingface dataset:
pričakuje, da bodo predložena letna poročila o pogodbah za izvrševanje proračuna, letni seznami projektov in njihove lokacije ter seznami končnih upravičencev; meni, da mora imeti poročevalec za razrešnice dostop do informacij, ki so zaradi varnostnih razlogov zaupne; pozdravlja zavezo Komisije o ponovnem pogajanju z Združenimi narodi o ustreznih sporazumih o skrbniških skladih, da doseže skupne smernice o poročanju in razkritju končnih upravičencev; pozdravlja tudi zavezo Komisije o organizaciji letnih zasedanj med Parlamentom in višjimi uradniki Združenih narodov, odgovornimi za upravljanje večdonatorskih skrbniških skladov, ter meni, da bi to zagotovilo okvir Združenim narodom za zagotavljanje dodatnih informacij o skladih EU;
Expects to receive annual reports on budget implementation contracts, an annual list of projects and their location and lists of final beneficiaries; considers that its rapporteur for the discharge should have access to information declared confidential for security reasons; welcomes the Commission's commitment to re-negotiate relevant agreements on trust funds with the UN in order to achieve joint reporting guidelines and disclosure of final beneficiaries; welcomes the Commission's commitment to organise annual meetings between Parliament and senior UN staff responsible for the management of multi-donor trust funds, and is of the opinion that this would provide a framework for the provision by the UN of additional information regarding EU funds;
obžaluje, da je ocena, ki jo je o notranjih revizijah v GD ECHO podalo Računsko sodišče, le "delno zadovoljiva" (priloga 8.2 letnega poročila);
Regrets that the ECA's assessment of internal audits in DG ECHO is only "partially satisfactory" (Annex 8.2 to the Annual Report);
v celoti podpira zaključke Računskega sodišča glede GD ECHO v letnim poročilu, in sicer: "GD ECHO mora razjasniti pravila o upravičenosti odhodkov, da prepreči dvoumne opredelitve in ravnotežje med revizijami, opravljenimi na sedežu GD ECHO in revizijami izvajalskih partnerjev na terenu, da se pridobi boljši pregled nad resničnostjo odhodkov za projekte" (točki 8.11 in 8.18 letnega poročila);
Fully supports the ECA's conclusions concerning DG ECHO in the Annual Report as follows: "DG ECHO should clarify the rules on eligibility of expenditure to prevent varying interpretations and the balance between DG ECHO's headquarters and field audits of implementing partners should be reviewed, in order to obtain a better view of the reality of project expenditure" (points 8.11 and 8.18 of the Annual Report);
obžaluje ugotovitev v točki 2.1 letnega poročila o dejavnostih generalnega direktorata za razvoj (GD DEV), da je "zagotavljanje skladnosti politik Skupnosti z vplivom na države v razvoju pomemben vir tveganja.
Regrets the finding set out at point 2.1 of the annual activity report of the Directorate-General for Development (DG DEV) to the effect that "Ensuring the coherence of Community policies with an impact on developing countries, is a major source of risk.
poziva Komisijo, naj Odboru za proračunski nadzor posreduje svoje predloge o reševanju teh razmer in o ukrepih, sprejetih v letu 2008, za izboljšanje delovanja notranjega kontrolnega sistema v GD DEV glede na raven izvajanja standardov notranje kontrole;
Asks the Commission to present to its Committee on Budgetary Control its ideas on how to confront this situation and the measures to be taken in 2008 to improve the functioning of the internal control system in DG DEV with regard to the level of implementation of internal control standards;
z zadovoljstvom ugotavlja, da se je po posebnem poročilu Računskega sodišča št. 5/2006 glede programa MEDA "upravljanje programa MEDA s strani Komisije od prvih let vidno izboljšalo in ga je mogoče šteti za zadovoljivo";
Notes with satisfaction that, according to the ECA Special Report No 5/2006 concerning the MEDA programme, "the Commission's management of the MEDA programme has clearly improved since the early years and can be considered as satisfactory";
poleg tega ugotavlja, da je Računsko sodišče ugotovilo, da so zaradi prenosa nalog delegacije Komisije igrale pomembno vlogo pri izvajanju programa, tako da so pomagale partnerskim državam pri odpravljanju težav postopkovnih vidikov javnih naročil;
Notes furthermore, as concluded by the ECA, that, as a result of devolution, Commission delegations have played an important role in the implementation of the programme by helping partner countries to deal with the procedural aspects of procurement;
poziva Komisijo, naj redno obvešča o izvajanju pregledov na kraju samem, ugotavljanju omembe vrednih primerov suma goljufij ali drugih finančnih nepravilnosti med zadnjim letom izvajanja programa MEDA;
Asks the Commission to regularly inform it of the carrying out of on-the-spot checks and inspections, identifying notable cases of suspected fraud or other financial irregularities during the last year of implementation of the MEDA programme;
pričakuje izboljšanje vidnosti ukrepov, ki jih EU financira z mednarodnimi skrbniškimi skladi, zlasti glede vsot, ki so večje od 1 milijarde EUR in so bile prenesene iz proračuna EU v sklade Združenih narodov in Svetovne banke; poziva Komisijo, naj zagotovi okrepitev političnega vodstva, vidnosti EU in nadzora nad skladi;
Looks forward to an increase in the visibility of actions financed by the EU via international trust funds, in particular in the context of the sums totalling more than EUR 1 billion which have been transferred from the EU budget to UN and World Bank funds; urges the Commission to ensure that political guidance, visibility and control of the funds are improved;
poziva Komisijo, naj redno predloži posebne ukrepe za še večji nadzor EU nad svojimi zunanjimi ukrep v geografskem okviru, v skladu z načeli učinkovitosti, odgovornosti in vidnosti;
Invites the Commission regularly to present to it specific measures to further increase EU ownership of its external actions in their geographical contexts, in accordance with the principles of efficiency, accountability and visibility;
poziva Komisijo, naj učinkovito in hitro obvešča o uporabi sredstev EU preko mednarodnih skrbniških skladov za Irak; poziva Komisijo, naj posodobi in vsebinsko dopolni informacije ter predlaga sistem, ki bi Parlamentu omogočil jasen in čitljiv vpogled v to, kaj je bilo dejansko financirano iz skladov EU preko mednarodnih skrbniških skladov po svetu;
Calls on the Commission to inform it efficiently and rapidly about the use of EU funds via international trust funds in Iraq; invites the Commission to update and give substance to this information, and to propose a system which enables Parliament to see in a clear and readable way what exactly has been co-financed by EU funds via international trust funds anywhere in the world;
v primerjavi z letom 2005 pozdravlja znatno povečanje stopnje izvajanja pri odobritvah za prevzem obveznosti in pri odobritvah za plačila za leto 2006 za predpristopno strategijo;
Welcomes the significant increase in the implementation rate of commitment and payment appropriations for pre-accession strategy in 2006, as compared to 2005;
čestita Komisiji za njeno pobudo o izboljšanju poročanja o napredku glede posegov razvojne politike na doseganje razvojnih ciljev tisočletja; je prepričan, da bo to zelo pripomoglo k izboljšanju odgovornosti na tem področju; z veseljem pričakuje podrobnosti o oceni pilotne faze, ki je bila uvedena leta 2007;
Congratulates the Commission on its initiative to improve reporting of the progress made by development policy interventions towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals; trusts that this will make a real contribution to improving accountability in this area; looks forward to receiving details of the evaluation of the pilot phase introduced in 2007;
opozarja na merilo, ki ga je določila Komisija, da je treba 20 % sredstev iz instrumenta za razvojno sodelovanje razporediti na osnovno in srednješolsko izobraževanje ter osnovno zdravstvo; z veseljem pričakuje podrobnosti o izvajanju merila v letu 2007;
Draws attention to the benchmark, agreed by the Commission, of 20% of funding under the Development Cooperation Instrument being allocated to basic and secondary education and basic health; looks forward to receiving details of the implementation of this benchmark in 2007;
pozdravlja pobudo Komisije za razvoj strukturiranega pristopa za podporo vrhovnih revizijskih institucij v državah, ki prejemajo proračunsko pomoč; vendar ugotavlja, da demokratična odgovornost na ravni partnerskih držav ne more biti dosežena, ne da bi okrepili tudi parlamentarne organe za proračunski nadzor, kot to določa člen 25(1b) Uredbe (ES) št. 1905/2006 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta z dne 18. decembra 2006 o vzpostavitvi instrumenta za financiranje razvojnega sodelovanja UL L 378, 27.12.2006, str.
Welcomes the Commission's initiative to develop a structured approach to support supreme audit institutions in countries receiving budget support; notes however that democratic accountability at the level of partner countries cannot be achieved without strengthening parliamentary budget control bodies, as required by Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p.
ugotavlja, da je bilo v letu 2006 91 % proračunske pomoči podeljene v obliki sektorske proračunske podpore, ki je bolje usmerjena kot splošna proračunska pomoč in zato vodi do nižjega tveganja; dvomi v "dinamično razlago" meril o upravičenosti za proračunsko pomoč, za katero je Računsko sodišče dejalo, da povečuje tveganje; meni, da je treba proračunsko pomoč namenjati le državam, ki že dosegajo najnižje standarde za verodostojno upravljanje javnih financ;
Notes that in 2006, 91% of budget support from the Community budget was delivered in the form of sector budget support, which is better targeted than general budget support and therefore leads to lower risks; questions the Commission's "dynamic interpretation" of the eligibility criteria for budget support, which, according to the ECA, increases risk; believes that budget support should only be undertaken in countries that already meet a minimum standard of credible management of public finances;
poziva Komisijo, naj izboljša preglednost in dostop do dokumentacije o ukrepih proračunske pomoči, zlasti z uvedbo sporazumov z državami upravičenkami, podobnih okvirnemu finančnemu in upravnemu sporazumu (FAFA), ki določa okvir za upravljanje finančnih prispevkov, ki jih Komisija namenja Združenim narodom;
Invites the Commission to improve transparency and access to documentation relating to budget support actions, particularly by establishing agreements with beneficiary countries analogous to FAFA and setting out a framework for managing the financial contributions made by the Commission to the UN;
upošteva kritike, ki jih je glede projektov tehnične pomoči Komisije podalo Računsko sodišče v posebnem poročilu št. 6/2007; nadalje ugotavlja, da bo Komisija ta vprašanja obravnavala pri svoji strategiji za dosego ciljev učinkovitosti pomoči EU za tehnično sodelovanje in enote za izvajanje projekta, ki naj bi bila končana do junija 2008; z veseljem pričakuje pravočasno oceno rezultatov izvajanja te strategije;
Notes the criticisms of Commission Technical Assistance projects made by the ECA in its Special Report No 6/2007; notes further that the Commission will address these questions in its Strategy to meet EU aid effectiveness targets on Technical Cooperation and Project Implementation Units, due by June 2008; looks forward to receiving, in due course, an assessment of the results of the implementation of this strategy;
pozdravlja ukrepe, ki jih je Komisija sprejela za spodbujanje usklajevanja med donatorji na področju tehnične pomoči; poudarja pomen usklajenega pristopa, ne le na ravni EU, temveč med vsemi donatorji, ter z veseljem pričakuje podrobnosti o napredku te pobude;
Welcomes the measures implemented by the Commission to promote donor coordination in the area of Technical Assistance; emphasises the importance of a coordinated approach, not only at EU level but among all donors, and looks forward to receiving details of the progress of this initiative;
ugotavlja, da je bilo leta 2006 24 delujočih agencij (vključno 2 izvajalski agenciji), v primerjavi s 16 agencijami v letu 2005, ki so tako krile obsežno vrsto funkcij na različnih lokacijah po EU;
Notes that in 2006, there were 24 agencies in operation (including 2 executive agencies), compared with 16 in 2005, covering an extensive range of functions in various locations in the EU;
ugotavlja, da je tako kot leta 2003, 2004 in 2005 notranji revizor Komisije tudi v letnem poročilu o dejavnostih za leto 2006 izrazil pridržek glede revizij regulativnih agencij: "Medtem, ko so bila službi za notranjo revizijo dodeljena mesta za revizijo regulativnih agencij, pa je istočasno povečanje števila agencij na sedaj 23 še vedno nezadostno, da bi službi za notranjo revizijo omogočilo pravilno izpolnjevanje dolžnosti, ki so ji bile dodeljene s členom 185 Finančne uredbe.
Notes that, as in 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Internal Auditor of the Commission expressed in its annual activity report for 2006 a reservation about the audits of the regulatory agencies: "While the IAS received posts for the audit of regulatory agencies, the parallel increase in the number of the agencies, now 23, still does not enable the IAS to properly fulfil its obligation assigned by article 185 of the Financial Regulation.
Na koncu leta 2006 je bila opravljena revizija za vse agencije vsaj enkrat v triletnem obdobju, namesto enkrat vsako leto, kot določa finančna uredba" (točka 3.b);
At the end of 2006, all the agencies were audited at least once over a three-year period instead of once every year as provided for by the Financial Regulation" (point 3.b);
poziva k analizi decentralizacije in njenega vpliva na osebje Komisije; poziva Komisijo, naj zaradi decentralizacije predloži časovni razpored za pregled svoje notranje organizacije;
Calls for an analysis of decentralisation and its effects on Commission staff; asks the Commission to present a timetable for a review of its internal organisation in light of decentralisation;
po treh letih obstoja zahteva medsebojni pregled vsake izvajalske agencije, da se oceni dodana vrednost programa, ki so ga izvajale te agencije, v primerjavi z zadevnim generalnim direktoratom;
Requests a peer review after 3 years of existence of each executive agency to asses the added value of programme implementation by executive agencies in comparison with the relevant Directorate-General;
opozarja na ugotovitve Računskega sodišča v točki 10.29 letnega poročila, da "izplačevanje subvencij, ki jih iz proračuna Skupnosti plača Komisija, ni osnovano na dovolj utemeljenih ocenah finančnih potreb agencij.
Notes the finding of the ECA at point 10.29 of its Annual Report that "the disbursement of subsidies paid by the Commission from the Community budget is not based on sufficiently justified estimates of the agencies cash requirements.
Zaradi tega in zaradi velikosti prenosov imajo agencije na bančnih računih veliko denarnih sredstev Znesek sredstev v gotovini, ki so ga agencije imele ob koncu leta 2006 (brez Urada za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu, Urada Skupnosti za rastlinske sorte, Prevajalskega centra za organe Evropske unije in Evropskega nadzornega organa za GNSS): 213 milijonov EUR v primerjavi z 810 milijoni EUR odobrenih sredstev.
This, combined with the size of carry-overs, leads them to hold sizeable cash balances Amount of cash held by the agencies at the end of 2006 (excluding the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, the Community Plant Variety Office, the Translation Centre for the bodies of the European Union and the European GNSS Supervisory Authority): EUR 213 million, compared to EUR 810 million in appropriations.
Sodišče priporoča, da je raven subvencij, izplačanih agencijam, v skladu z njihovimi resničnimi finančnimi potrebami";
The ECA recommends that the level of subsidies paid to the agencies is in line with their real cash requirements";
poziva Komisijo, naj podrobneje spremlja sredstva na računih agencij in jim naloži bolj stroge obveze, da v svojih zahtevkih za plačila predložijo natančno napoved resničnih finančnih potreb, da se izogne nepotrebnim denarnim tokovom in da pripravi boljša predvidevanja;
Asks the Commission to follow more closely the cash balances of the agencies and to impose more stringent obligations on them as regards the submission , in payment requests, of rigorous forecasts of real cash requirements in order to avoid unnecessary cash movements and to have better future estimates;
poziva k subkonsolidaciji računovodskih izkazov agencij;
Calls for subconsolidation of agencies' accounts;
Nepremičninska politika Skupnosti
Community buildings policy
je zaskrbljen zaradi splošnega strukturnega primanjkljaja za leto 2006, ki je ponovno dosegel znaten znesek v višini 5 milijonov EUR za vzdrževanje in obnovo vseh stavb, ki so v lasti Komisije (med drugimi stavba Berlaymont); pozdravlja študijo glede premoženja, ki jo je leta 2007 naročil Urad za infrastrukturo in logistiko v Bruslju (OIB) in ki naj bi ponudila prvo obrazloženo oceno potrebnih sredstev in časovni razpored za izvedbo potrebnih del, da se tako zagotovi najboljše možno upravljanje z naložbami Komisije v nepremičnine;
Is concerned at the 2006 global structural deficit, which again reached the significant amount of EUR 5 million for maintenance and refurbishment of all buildings owned by the Commission (including the Berlaymont); welcomes the patrimonial study commissioned by the Office for Infrastructures and Logistics – Brussels (OIB) in 2007, which should provide a first reasoned estimate of the amount required and a timetable for the work necessary to ensure the best possible management of the Commission's property investments;
pričakuje, da bo Komisija pristojni odbor obveščala o rezultatih te študije in o napovedi načrtovanja, s posebnim poudarkom na podrobnostih za stavbo Berlaymont;
Expects the Commission to keep its competent committees informed of the outcome of this study and of the planning forecast, with special emphasis on details of the Berlaymont building;
poziva Komisijo, naj vključi rezultate analize kadrovskih potreb in svojega sporočila o politiki namestitve služb Komisije v Bruslju in Luxembourgu ( KOM(2007)0501 ), preuči v njem omenjene prostorske potrebe in do septembra 2008 poroča o rezultatih izvajanja te naloge;
Requests the Commission to integrate the results of staff screening and of its Communication on policy for the accommodation of commission services in Brussels and Luxembourg ( COM(2007)0501 ), to revise the space need set out therein accordingly and to report on the results of this exercise by September 2008;
predlaga, da mora biti v konsolidiranih računovodskih izkazih EU določba o večjih vzdrževalnih delih na stavbah;
Suggests that there should be a provision in the EU's consolidated accounts for major building maintenance work;
ponavlja svoje stališče, da je treba opraviti študijo o izvedljivosti oblikovanja evropskega organa za nepremičnine, ki bo odgovoren za izgradnjo in vzdrževanje stavb institucij in organov EU;
Reiterates its view that a study should be made of the feasibility of establishing a European property authority with responsibility for the construction and maintenance of the buildings of the EU institutions and bodies;
ugotavlja, da je bil marca 1999 na zasedanju Evropskega sveta v Berlinu sklenjen dogovor, da bi bilo treba iz strukturnih skladov Namen strukturnih skladov je financirati programe trajnostnega socialno-ekonomskega in okoljskega razvoja v državah članicah.
Notes that the European Council agreed at its meeting in Berlin in March 1999 that EUR 195 billion (EUR 219 billion in 2005 prices) should be made available from the Structural Funds Structural Funds aim at financing sustainable socio-economic and environmental development programmes in the Member States.
V novem programskem obdobju se je želelo doseči večjo stopnjo koncentracije, večjo avtonomnost upravnih struktur, večjo učinkovitost in strogi proračunski nadzor (zasedanje Evropskega sveta v Lizboni, marec 2000).
The new programming period tried to achieve a greater degree of concentration, more devolved management structures, greater efficiency and tighter budgetary control (Lisbon European Council meeting - March 2000).
za obdobje 2000–2006 omogočiti 195 milijard EUR (219 milijard EUR pri cenah v letu 2005), ter da bi se dodatnih 16 milijard EUR za obdobje 2004–2006 namenilo za približno 200 programov v novih državah članicah V obdobju 2000–2006 je bilo za strukturne ukrepe porabljenih približno 260 milijard EUR.
for the period 2000-2006, and that an additional EUR 16 billion for the years 2004-2006 should be allocated to around 200 programmes in the new Member States; For the period 2000-2006 approximately EUR 260 billion was spent on structural measures.
ugotavlja, da je pri izvajanju programov iz obdobja 1994–1999 prišlo do zamude, ki je imela kot eno izmed posledic pozno načrtovanje za obdobje 2000–2006;
Notes that the implementation of programmes from the period 1994 - 1999 encountered a delay, which had as one consequence the late programming for the period 2000 - 2006;
posledično je zaskrbljen, da bi podatkovna zbirka za vmesno oceno ne bila zadostno obširna, da bi se lahko prišlo do konkretnih zaključkov;
As a consequence, is concerned that the database for the mid-term evaluation processes may not have been sufficiently large to arrive at robust conclusions;
poleg tega upošteva ugotovitve iz posebnih poročil 7/2003 in 10/2006 Računskega sodišča o predhodnem in naknadnem vrednotenju odhodkov za strukturne sklade, v katerih je Računsko sodišče poudarilo, da:
Notes furthermore the findings of ECA's special reports 7/2003 and 10/2006 on the ex-ante and ex-post evaluation of Structural Funds expenditure respectively, in which the ECA highlighted that:
so bila proračunska sredstva določena z maksimalno možno absorpcijo sredstev;
budgetary allocations were determined by maximising likely absorption of funding,
je imelo predhodno vrednotenje le majhen vpliv na postopek načrtovanja;
ex-ante evaluations had little impact on the programming process;
so bile v naknadnem vrednotenju odkrite znatne pomanjkljivosti in nadzor Komisije nad njimi;
significant weaknesses were found in the ex-post evaluations and the Commission's oversight of them;
poudarja, da je Komisija v svojem delovnem dokumentu št. 8 opisala splošni cilj vmesnega vrednotenja kot sledi:
Highlights that the Commission described the overall aim of the mid-term evaluation in its working document n° 8 as follows:
oceniti, ali različne oblike pomoči ostajajo ustrezno sredstvo za reševanje težav, s katerimi se sooča regija ali sektor;
to assess whether the various forms of assistance remain the appropriate means to address the issues confronting the region or sector;
pregledati, ali so strateške osi, prednostne naloge in cilji še skladni, primerni in še vedno relevantni;
to review whether the strategic axes, priorities and objectives are coherent, appropriate and still relevant;
oceniti kolikšen napredek je bil dosežen pri doseganju teh ciljev in v kolikšni meri jih je dejansko možno doseči;
to appraise how far progress has been made towards the achievement of these objectives and the extent to which they can actually be achieved;
oceniti količinsko opredelitev ciljev še zlasti pa, v kolikšni meri so olajšali spremljanje in vrednotenje; oceniti, v kolikšni meri so bile horizontalne prednostne naloge - zlasti enake možnosti in okolje - vključene v oblike pomoči;
to assess the quantification of objectives, specifically the extent to which they have facilitated monitoring and evaluation; to assess the extent to which horizontal priorities - equal opportunities and the environment in particular - have been integrated into the forms of assistance;